r/EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Errergency &
Remedial Response
Washington, DC 20460
540HW1010
HW-lO.iO
.September 1989
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
NATIONAL PRIORITIES IIST, FINAL RULES
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is adding 93 proposed sites
^including 11 Federal facility sites) to the National Priorities list (NPL) and
dropping 31 proposed sites from further consideration. Of the States and
"territories, 26 are adding sites to the NPL iri two final rules published in the
^Federal Register in early October. Pennsylvania leads with 17 new final sites
followed by California with 9. Ihe number of final sites now totals 981
-'including 52 in the Federal facility section.
Of the States and Territories, seven have no sites on the new final NPL:
American Samoa, Ccranonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the District of
Columbia, Hawaii, Nevada, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the
Virgin Islands. New Jersey has the largest number of final sites (103),
followed by Pennsylvania (87), New York (74), Michigan (68), and California
(61).
Proposed sites now total 213 including 63 in the Federal facility section.
Final and proposed sites total 1,194. New Jersey has the largest number of
final and proposed sites (108), followed by Pennsylvania (95) and California
(88).
Ihe NPL identifies abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if long-term "remedial action" is
necessary. Sites on the NPL are eligible for such action under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERdA),
enacted on December 11, 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA), enacted on October 17, 1986. SARA authorizes a
"Hazardous Substances Superfund" totaling $8.5 billion over 5 years to pay
costs for overseeing work by those responsible for cleaning up waste sites, and
to pay costs not assumed by responsible parties. EPA has the primary
responsibility for managing cleanup and enforcement activities under Superfund.
This document provides background information on the final rules and the
following lists:
o Ihe 93 proposed sites being added to the final NPL arranged alpha-
betically by State.
o The distribution of all sites by States arranged by the number of
new final sites.
Deletion of Final Site
On September 22, 1989 (54 FR 38994), the following site was deleted:
o Cecil Lindsey, Newport, AR
-------
When the first finaj. NPUwas promulgated in September 1983, EPA announced
certain listing policies relating to sites that night qualify for the NFL. One
of these policies involved facilities subject to Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) . EPA's policy was generally to defer from
the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (that is, land dly^nRal units that received
hazardous waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
regulations) because EPA can require the owner/operator to clean them up under
RCRA. The RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to those under
CERCXA, ensuring that all actions taken will protect human health and the
environment. Dropping such sites from the NPL also preserves CERCXA resources
for sites where no other cleanup authority is available.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSHA) were
enacted, expanding EPA's authority to require corrective measures under
Subtitle C. As a result of this broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its
policy for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the NPL, and on June 10,
1986 (54 ER 21109) announced three major components of the NPL/RCRA policy.
Specifically, EPA announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on the NPL if one or more of
these conditions exist:
o The facilities are owned by persons who have demonstrated an inability
to finance appropriate corrective action by invoking bankruptcy laws.
o The facilities have lost authorization to operate (also known as the
Loss of Interim Status, or LOIS provision) , and there are additional
indications that the owner or operator is unwilling to undertake
corrective action.
o The facilities have not lost authorization to operate but have a clear
history of unwillingness to undertake corrective action. These
situations are determined on a case-by-case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 ER 23978), EPA announced additional components of the
NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter of policy, EPA will list four additional
categories of RCRA-related sites:
o Facilities that were treating, storing, or disposing Subtitle C
hazardous waste after November 19, 1980, but that did not file a Part A
permit application by that date as required and have little or no
history of compliance with RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or late
filers, although they are technically subject to RCRA, are not likely
to be cleaned up expediticusly under RCRA and so should be on the NPL.
o Facilities with permits for the treatment, storage, or diisprifinl of
hazardous waste issued before enactment of HSWA, and whose
owners/operators will not voluntarily modify the permit. Pre-HSWA
permittees are not required to take corrective action for releases from
solid waste management units. Under RCRA Section 3004 (u) , EPA does not
have the authority to modify a pre-HSWA permit for corrective action
until the permit is reissued. Many pre-HSWA permits are for 10 years.
Since the last pre-HSWA permit was issued prior to November 8, 1984, it
-------
could be 1994 before EPA could modify some permits to include
corrective action. In these cases, EPA believes CERCXA authorities
will result in the most expeditious cleanup.
o Facilities that filed a Part A permit application for treatment,
storage, or disposal of Subtitle C hazardous waste as a precautionary
measure only. Such facilities — for example, generators,
transporters, or recyclers or hazardous waste — are not subject to
Subtitle C corrective action authorities. These are referred to as
protective filers.
o Facilities that at one time treated or stored Subtitle C hazardous
waste but have since converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90 days or less) or any
other hazardous waste activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Part A permit applications have been withdrawn with
EPA or State approval, are referred to as converters. EPA believes it
has the authority under PCRA Section 3008 (u) to compel corrective
action at such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective action program
currently focuses primarily on treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (due to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore, this
category should be on the NPL to ensure expeditious cleanup.
At the same time it announced these four new categories for listing RCRA-
related sites, EPA proposed to act on 43 RCRA-related sites proposed in the
first four updates to the NPL before the expanded 1986 policy. EPA proposed to
place 13 sites to the NPL because they are either 1) in one of the four
categories, or 2) involve special site-specific issues. EPA also proposed to
remove 30 sites from the NPL because they are subject to the corrective action
authorities of PCRA Subtitle C. Cleanup activities are underway at most of the
sites lander RCRA and in some cases under CERCXA or joint RCRA/CERCIA
authorities.
Contents of Rules
The 93 sites are being added to the NPL because they have scores of 28.50
or above on the Hazard Ranking System, a numerically based system designed to
evaluate the relative risks posed by a site to human health or the environment.
Of the 93 sites, 23 are included in one final rule consisting exclusively of
sites involving RCRA Subtitle C; this rule also drops 27 sites on the basis of
the NPL/RCRA policy. The remaining 70 new final sites (including 4 sites
subject to RCRA Subtitle C authority) are covered in a separate rule.
Pending completion of review of comments or resolution of technical or
policy issues, 213 sites remain proposed. They will be considered for listing
in future final rules.
-------
In the Federal Register notice consisting exclusively of RCRA-related
sites, the 13 sites reproposed in June 1988 (Table 1) are being added to the
NFL. This rule adds another 10 RCRA sites, originally proposed in Updates #7
and #8, which subsequently received no public ooiinent. The 10 RCRA sites and
their NPL categories are:
o Bream & Bryant, Inc. (Arvin Plant), Arvin, California, nan- or late
filer
o ttarzone, Inc./Qievron Chemical Co., Tifton, GA, nan- or late filer
o Ilada Energy Co., East Cape Girardeau, IL, non- or late filer
o Electro-Coatings, Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA, protective filer
o Benfield Industries Inc., Hazelwood, NC, protective filer
o Brook Industrial Park, Bound Brook, NT, non- or late filer
o Tri-Cities Barrel Co., Inc., Port Crane, NY, converter
o Rectican/Allied Steel Corp., East Coventry Township, PA, protective
filer
o Dixie Oil Processors, Inc., Friendswood, TX, protective filer
o American Crossarm & Conduit Co., Chehalis, NA, protective filer
The RCRA Federal Register notice also drops 26 of 30 sites involved in the
June 1988 proposed rule (Table 2). The following sites continue to be
prx
o Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. (formerly known as Fairchild Camera &
Instrument Corp.) (Mountain View Plant), Mountain View, CA
o Chemplex Co., dinton/Camanche, IA
o Findett Corp., St. Charles, MO
o Burlington Northern Railroad (Somers Tie-Treating Plant), Somers, MT
In addition, the following RCRA site, proposed because the owner was then
bankrupt, is being dropped in the RCRA rule because the owner is no longer
bankrupt:
o Kaiser Steel Corp. (Fontana Plant), Fontana, CA
The second Federal Register notice adds to the NPL two RCRA sites whose
owners have invoked bankruptcy laws. They are:
o Lenz Oil Service, Inc., Lament, IL
o Tonolli Corp., Nesguehoning, PA
Additionally, this rule adds two sites classified as RCRA converters:
o Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (Albany Plant), Albany, GA
o AMP, Inc. (Glen Rock Facility), Glen Rock, PA
-------
Table 1 Reproposed RCRA Sites Added to NPL
AZ: Motorola, me.
(52nd Street
Plant)
Phoenix
Converter
10/15/84
CA:
CA:
CA:
PL:
IN:
ME:
MI:
MO:
NE:
NC:
VA:
VA:
Fairchild Semi- South San
(formerly Fairchild
Camera & Instrment
Corp.)
(South San Jose
Plant)
J. H. Baxter Co. Weed
Lorentz Barrel San Jose
& Dru& Co.
City Industries Orlando
Inc.
Prestolite Battery Vincennes
Division
Union Chemical South Hope
Co. Inc.
ipuBBMr Trrfmrh T*i Ji 1 ^adi 1 1 j»r»
Corp.
»
Conservation Kansas City
Chemical Co.
Lindsay Manuf ac- Lindsay
turing Co.
National Starch Salisbury
& Chemical Corp.
Oilpaper MnrH m1p«p*i-
Preservers, Inc.
Buckingham County Budcinoham
Converter
Unwilling
Non-filer
LOISAawilling
action may not
apply to all
LOIS/Unwilling
Onnvjaw^Ai*
^Us>IW^ wsj*
unwilling
Anendment to
i^iffte listing
Converter
HCRA 3008(a)
order
LOIS/unuilling
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
09/18/85
04/10/85
09/18/85
04/10/85
10/15/84
04/10/85
10/15/84
10/15/84
Landfill (formerly
Love's Container
Service Landfill)
-------
2 Reorooosed RCRA Sites Dropped from NPL
Oft: nc Oocp. (ftaaano
Plant)
CH: HMlatt-Packard
A: IBM Corp. (Sen JOM
Plant)
A: hferlay Cooling
Go.
Ok: flhona-Poulanc, Hoe./
A:
ci, Inc.
Ok: Southern pacific
Tkmporation Oo.
A: Van Natani 4 Rogm
Inc.
00: Martin Ifcrlatta
(
PL: Pratt & tfcitnay
Aixenft/Uhitad
Oocp.
Oi: Olin Corp.
1,2 & 4)
IA: A.Y.
mAwtdH, me.
IA: Frit Ir&Mtrtm
(Hutoldt Plant)
Palo Alto
Palo Alto
Wataitcn
Auguata
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
09/18/85
09/18/85
09/08/83
09/18/85
04/10/85
-------
Tabla2 (oont'd)
ZA: Joan Oaax*
(Dubuqu* Works)
09/18/85
IA:
IL:
IN:
KB:
MI:
MI:
NB:
NT:
OH:
PA:
VA:
W:
U.S. Nanaplata Co.
Sbaffiald (U.S.
*nr?lOTV TOP )
Firaatcoa Industrial
Products Co.
National Industrial
Hookar (Mantagua
Plant)
Lacks mduatrlaa,
Inc.
Monzoa Auto Bquip-
nant Co.
Mttlacfc, Inc.
Qanaral Zlactric Co.
Rote & KM! Co.
Landfill
IBM Corp. (Mftnasaas
Plant SpiU)
Mdbay Chamlnnl Corp.
Mount Vtenon
Sbaffiald
Noblaavilla
Furlay
Mantagua
Grand Rapida
Cozad
Ttfccahip
Bristol ItMnahip
Manaaaas
Naw Mtrtinavilla
10/15/84
10/15/84
09/18/85
10/15/84
09/18/85
10/15/84
09/18/85
09/18/85
10/15/84
04/10/85
10/15/84
10/15/84
(Naw Martinavilla
Plant)
-------
Federal Facility Sites
Section 120 (a) of SARA requires that Federal facilities be subject to and
comply with CERQA in the sane manner as any nongovernmental entity. CERCXA
Section lll(e) (3), however, generally prohibits use of the Superfund for
remedial actions at Federally owned facilities.
Prior to the current action, 41 sites were on the Federal section of the
final NFL and 74 were proposed, for a total of 115. EPA is adding 11 sites to
the Federal section of the final NPL. Thus, 52 sites are on the Federal
section of the NPL and 63 are prc
RCR& Policy. In its June 1986 announcement, EPA stated that it would
consider at a later date whether its revised policy for deferring non-Federal
RCRA-regulated sites from the NPL should apply to Federal facilities.
Because most Federal facilities nave RCRA-regulated units within their
boundaries, EPA determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should be adopted
for Federal facilities. As a result, on May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991), EPA
published a policy proposing that Federal facilities should be considered for
the NPL regardless of the existence on the facility of units subject to the
Subtitle C corrective action authorities of RCRA. The proposed policy was
based on several considerations:
o Congress clearly intended that Federal facility sites should be on the
NPL.
o Strict application of the non-Federal NPL/RCRA policy would exclude
virtually all Federal facility sites from the NPL because they would
not likely meet any of the criteria necessary for listing (inability to
pay as evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or demonstrated
unwillingness to comply with RCRA).
o Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the NPL serves the primary
purpose of listing Federal facility sites: to advise the public of the
status of Federal government cleanup efforts.
o Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set priorities and focus
cleanup efforts on those sites that present the most serious problem.
The policy notice published on March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520) describes EPA's
decision to include Federal facility sites on the NPL even if they may be
subject to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action authorities. The notice also
explains the process whereby EPA, the Federal facility, and the State can enter
into an Interagency Agreement to define corrective action responsibilities at a
site.
Special study Waste Sites
Section 105 (g) of CERCLA, as amended by SARA, requires EPA to consider
certain factors (waste characteristics, extent of release, potential exposure,
and degree of hazard) before proposing sites with "special study wastes," as
-------
defined under RCRA Section 3001 (b) (2) [drilling fluids], 3001(b) (3) (A) (ii)
[mining wastes], and 3001 (b) (3) (A) (iii) [cement kiln dust]. Five sites
containing or possibly containing special study wastes are being added to the
final NPL. The sites and their special study wastes are:
o Dover Gas Light Co., Dover, DE (coal tar)
o Kerr-MoGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant), Soda Springs, ID
(mining wastes)
o D. L. Mud, Inc., Abbeville, IA (oil drilling mud and produced waters)
o Ciramaron Mining Corp., Carrizozo, NM (mining wastes)
o Jacks Creek/Sitkin Smelting & Refining, Inc., Maitland, PA (mining
wastes)
Mining Sites
EPA's position is that mining wastes may be hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants under CERCLA and, therefore, mining waste sites are
eligible for the NPL. This position was affirmed in 1985 by the United States
Court of Appeals.
Prior to listing mining sites, EPA has considered whether they might be
satisfactorily addressed using State-share monies from the Abandoned Mine land
Reclamation (AMLR) Fund under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA). AMLR funds are primarily intended for reclamation and
restoration of land and water resources adversely affected by past coal mining.
Three noncoal mining sites are being added to the NFL in this final rule:
o Kerr-MoGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant), Soda Springs, ID
o Cimarron Mining Corp., Carrizozo, NM
o Jacks Creek/Sitkin Smelting & Refining, Inc., Maitland, PA
The first two are not eligible for funding under SMCRA. The third was
abandoned prior to the enactment date of SMCRA. Since Pennsylvania has an
approved AMLR program, the site is potentially eligible for SMCRA funds.
However, available information suggests the site will not be addressed under
SMCRA in the foreseeable future.
Score Revisions
EPA has revised the HRS scores for 24 sites based on its review of comments
and additional information developed by EPA and the States. For four of these
sites, the public comments and/or additional information have resulted in
scores below the cut-off of 28.50. Accordingly, these four sites are being
dropped from the proposed NPL at this time:
o GBF, Inc., Dump, Antioch, CA
o Pigeon Point land fill, New Castle, DE
o Stauffer Chemical Co. (Chicago Heights Plant), Chicago Heights, XL
o Mccarty's Bold Knob Landfill, Mt Vernon, IN
-------
Name Revisions
The names of two sites have been changed in response to information
received during the eminent period. The changes are intended to reflect more
accurately the location, nature, or potential sources of contamination at the
site:
o Carp Lejeune Marine Corps Base, Onslow County, NC,
Camp Lejeune Military Reservaton
o Ametek, Inc. (Hunter Spring Division), Batfield, PA,
North Perm - Area 2
HRS Effective Date
On Decentoer 23, 1988 (53 JR 51962), EPA proposed revisions to the HRS in
response to CERdA Section 105 (c) (1), added by SARA, which provides that EPA
should revise the HRS by October 17, 1988 (24 months after the enactment of
SARA).
Cdonenters on NFL rules have argued that the October 17, 1988 date is the
effective date for all purposes of Section 105 (c) (1), and EPA cannot use the
current HRS after that date to propose or promulgate sites to the NFL. The
ccranenters believe that EPA may not resume listing sites until the HRS
revisions are proposed and made effective. EPA does not agree and provided its
rationale for its position on March 31, 1989 (54 PR 13299). EPA intends to
issue the revise HRS as soon as possible. However, until the proposed
revisions have been subject to public cannent and put into effect, EPA will
continue to propose and promulgate sites using the current HRS, in accordance
with CERCXA Section 105 (c) (1) and Congressional intent.
10
-------
Additional Publications
An additional publication is available on the final rules:
o "Descriptions of 93 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities List in
September 1989." Publication HW-10.19. For a single free copy, contact
EPA's Public Information Center (PIC), PM-211B, 401 M St. SW, Washington,
DC 20460, telephone 202-382-2080.
Descriptions of all proposed and final NFL sites are now contained in
eight documents: HW-8.19 (just issued) plus these seven previously issued
documents:
o Addendum to "Background Information, National Priorities List, Special
Proposed Update." August 1989. Available from PIC.
o "Descriptions of 52 Federal Facility Sites in Proposed Update |9 to the
National Priorities List." July 1989. Publication HW-8.18. Available
from PIC.
o "Descriptions of 10 Sites in Proposed Update #8 to the National Priorities
List." May 1989. Publication HW-8.17. Available from PIC.
o "Descriptions of 101 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities List
in March 1989." Publication HW-8.15. Available from PIC.
o "Descriptions of 273 Sites Proposed for the National Priorities List as
of March 1989." Ihe descriptions have been compiled into one document
as a convenience. Publication HW-8.16. Available from PIC.
o "Descriptions of 272 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities List,
1985-87." Previously, these descriptions were available in two documents.
Ihey have been compiled into one document as a convenience. Publication
HW-8.10/8.11. Available from PIC.
o Descriptions of 538 sites placed on the final NPL in 1983-84:
"Hazardous Waste Sites: Descriptions of Sites on Current National
Priorities List, October 1984." Publication HS^-8.5. Available from the
National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, telephone
703-487-4650. Accession No. PB85-224756. Cost is $49.95 per copy,
$6.95 in microfiche, plus $3 handling fee per order.
Publication HW-10.8 is obsolete and may be discarded.
11
-------
National Priorities List,
New Final Sites (by State)
September 1989
St Site Name
City/County
AZ Motorola, Inc.(52nd Street Plant)
CA Brown & Bryant, Inc.(Arvin Plant)
CA Fairchild Semiconduct(S San Jose)
CA Fresno Municipal Sanitary Lndfll
CA J.H. Baxter & Co.
CA Jasco Chemical Corp.
CA Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.
CA Montrose Chemical Corp.
CA Pacific Coast Pipe Lines
CA Synertek, Inc. (Building 1)
CT Barkhamsted-New Hartford Landfill
CT Durham Meadows
CT Gallup's Quarry
CT Precision Plating Corp.
DE Dover Gas Light Co.
DE Sussex County Landfill No. 5
FL Agrico Chemical Co.
FL Chemform, Inc.
FL City Industries, Inc.
FL Standard Auto Bumper Corp.
FL Sydney Mine Sludge Ponds
FL Vingate Road Munic Incinerat Dump
GA Firestone Tire (Albany Plant)
GA Marzone Inc./Chevron Chemical Co.
IA Electro-Coatings, Inc.
ID Kerr-McGee Chemical(Soda Springs)
IL Ilada Energy Co.
IL Lenz Oil Service, Inc.
IL Woodstock Municipal Landfill
IN Prestolite Battery Division
Phoenix
Arvin
South San Jose
Fresno
Weed
Mountain View
San Jose
Torrance
Fillmore
Santa Clara
Barkhamsted
Durham
Plainfield
Vernon
Dover
Laurel
Pensacola
Pompano Beach
Orlando
Hialeah
Brandon
Fort Lauderdale
Albany
Tifton
Cedar Rapids
Soda Springs
East Cape Girardeau
Lemont
Woodstock
Vincennes
12
-------
National Priorities List,
New Final Sites (by State)
September 1989
St Site Name
City/County
LA D.L. Mud, Inc.
HE Union Chemical Co., Inc.
MI Albion-Sheridan Township Landfill
MI Barrels, Inc.
MI Kysor Industrial Corp.
MO Conservation Chemical Co.
MO Kern-Pest Laboratories
MO St Louis Airport/HIS/Fut Coatings
MO Wheeling Disposal Service Co. Lf
NC Benfield Industries, Inc.
NC Geigy Chemical Corp(Aberdeen Pit)
NC JFD Electronics/Channel Master
NC National Starch & Chemical Corp.
NE Lindsay Manufacturing Co.
NJ Brook Industrial Park
NJ South Jersey Clothing Co.
NJ Witco Chemical Corp.(Oakland Pit)
NM Cimarron Mining Corp.
NM Pagano Salvage
NY Tri-Cities Barrel Co., Inc.
PA A.I.W. Frank/Mid-County Mustang
PA AMP, Inc. (Glen Rock Facility)
PA Bell Landfill
PA Berks Landfill
PA Commodore Semiconductor Group
PA CryoChem, Inc.
PA Eastern Diversified Metals
PA Jacks Creek/Sitkin Smelting & Ref
PA North Penn - Area 2
PA Novak Sanitary Landfill
PA Occidental Chem/Firestone Tire
PA Publicker Industries Inc.
PA Raymark
PA Recticon/Allied Steel Corp.
PA River Road Lf/Waste Mngmnt, Inc.
PA Tonolli Corp.
Abbeville
South Hope
Albion
Lansing
Cadillac
Kansas City
Cape Girardeau
St. Louis County
Amazonia
Hazelwood
Aberdeen
Oxford
Salisbury
Lindsay
Bound Brook
Minotola
Oakland
Carrizozo
Los Lunas
Port Crane
Exton
Glen Rock
Terry Township
Spring Township
Lower Providence Twp
Worman
Hometown
Maitland
Hatfield
South Whitehall Twp
Lower Pottsgrove Twp
Philadephia
Hatboro •
East Coventry Twp
Hermitage
Nesquehoning
13
-------
National Priorities List,
New Final Sites (by State)
September 1989
St Site Name
City/County
RI
SC
SC
TN
TX
UT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VT
VT
VT
WA
UA
Rose Hill Regional Landfill
Lexington County Landfill Area
Rochester Property
Mai lory Capacitor Co.
Dixie Oil Processors, Inc.
Utah Power&Light/ American Barrel
Buckingham County Landfill
Culpeper Wood Preservers, Inc.
Dixie Caverns County Landfill
Saunders Supply Co.
BFI Sanitary Landfill (Rockingham)
Darling Hill Dump
Tans i tor Electronics, Inc.
American Crossarm & Conduit Co.
General Electric (Spokane Shop)
South Kingstown
Cayce
Travelers Rest
Waynesboro
Friendswood
Salt Lake City
Buckingham
Culpeper
Salem
Chuckatuck
Rockingham
Lyndon
Bennington
Chehalis
Spokane
WI Sauk County Landfill
Excelsior
Number of New Final Sites: 82
14
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facility Sites, New Final (by State)
September 1989
St Site Name
City/County
CO Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE)
MD Aber Prov Ground-Michaelsville Lf
NC Camp Lejeune Military Reservation
OH Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
PA Naval Air Develop Center(8 Areas)
PR Naval Security Group Activity
WA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
WA Naval Undersea Warf Sta (4 Areas)
Number of New Final Federal Facility Sites: 11
Golden
Aberdeen
Onslow County
Dayton
Warminster Township
Sabana Seca
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Keyport
15
-------
Final
National Priorities List,
Proposed Sitts Per State/Territory
(by New Final Sitas)
September 1969
New Final
State/Territory
Pennsylvania
California
Washington
Florida
North Carolina
Connecticut
Missouri
Virginia
Illinois
Michigan
New Jersey
Vermont
Delaware
Georgia
New Mexico
South Carolina
Arizona
Colorado
Idaho
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Nebraska
New York
Ohio
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Wisconsin
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arkansas
Commonwealth of Marianas
District of Columbia
Guam
Hawai i
Kansas
Kentucky
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Mississippi
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Oregon
South Dakota
Trust Territories
Virgin Islands
West Virginia
Wyoming
Non-Fed
16
9
2
6
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fed
1
0
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Final
Non-Fed
84
53
23
38
19
12
16
15
22
68
100
7
13
8
7
16
6
12
5
31
10
9
6
7
3
73
29
8
9
10
24
4
36
8
1
0
9-
0
0
1
0
9
12
21
39
2
8
0
15
2
7
5
1
0
0
5
1
Fed
3
8
9
0
1
0
2
1
4
0
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed
Non-Fed
7
14
8
8
2
2
4
4
11
11
2
1
5
3
1
5
2
1
2
4
10
1
1
1
0
5
1
0
0
2
2
4
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
5
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
Fed
1
13
5
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
3
2
0
2
1
2
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Total
95
88
45
50
22
14
23
20
37
79
108
8
19
13
10
22
11
16
9
35
21
11
9
10
4
82
33
9
11
14
29
12
39
12
5
0
9
0
0
1
7
11
17
25
41
3
10
0
16
2
11
7
1
0
0
5
3
Total
82
11
929
52
150
63 1194
-------
•I
'
:ed States
ironmental Protection
ncy
For further information, call the
Superfund Hotline, toll-free
at 1-800-424-9346 or
382-3000 m Washington.
DC. metropolitan area, or the
U. S. EPA Superfund Offices
listed below
For publications, contact:
Public Information Center
401 M Street SW
Washington DC 20460
CMU202) 382-2080
FTS: 382-2080
Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response (OS-230)
401 M Street. SW
Washington, DC 20460
CML: (202)475-8103
S: 475-8103
*
Jon 1
ste Management Division,
HAA-CAN 2
John F Kennedy Building
Boston. MA 02203
CML: (617) 573-5700
FTS: 833-1700
Region 2
Emergency & Remedial Response
Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
CML: (212)264-8672
FTS: 264-8672
Region 3
Hazardous Waste Management
Division. 3HWOO
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia. PA 19107
CML: (215)597-8131
FTS: 597-8131
Region 4
Waste Management Division
345 Courtland Street. NE
Atlanta. GA 30365
CML: (404)347-3454
FTS: 257-3454
Region 5
Waste Management Division,
5HR-12
230 South Dearborn Street, 12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
CML: (312)886-7579
FTS: 88c-7579
Regioi ;
HazaracuS Waste Management
Division. 6H
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas. TX 75202-2733
CML: (214) 655-6700
FTS: 255-6700
Region 7
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS66101
CML: (913) 236-2850
FTS: 757-2850
Region 8
Hazardous Waste Management
Division, 8HWM
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2405
CML: (303)293-1720
FTS: 564-1720
Region 9
Hazardous Waste Management
Division, T-1
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA94105
CML: (415)974-7460
FTS: 454-7460
Region 10
Hazardous Waste Division. HW-111
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle. WA 98101
CML: (206)442-1906
FTS: 399-1906
------- |