PB95-963702
EPA/ROD/R01-95/102
March 1996
EPA Superfund
Record of Decision:
Pease Air Force Base,
Zone 3, NH
9/26/1995
-------
Record of Decision
For Zone 3
Pease Air Force Base, NH
September 1995
Prepared for:
Air Force Base Conversion Agency (AFBCA)
The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330
Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
Base Closure Division (AFCEE/ESB)
Brooks Air Force Base, TX 78235-5328
Prepared by:
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1 Weston Way
West Chester, PA 19380-1499
-------
Record of Decision
Zone3
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
September 1995
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page No.
DECLARATION viii
I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION 1
II. ZONE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES 10
A- Zone Use and Response History 10
B. Enforcement History 17
III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 18
IV. SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE
ACTION 19
V. SUMMARY OF ZONE CHARACTERISTICS 21
A. Zone Geology 21
B. Zone Hydrogeology 27
C. Zone Surface Water Hydrology 30
D. Zone Source Area General Characteristics 32
E. Zone Groundwater Characteristics 38
F. Groundwater Conceptual Model 43
G. Zone Surface Water/Sediment Sources 51
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 57
A. Data Evaluation and Reduction 58
B. Human Health Risk Assessment 59
C. Ecological Risk Assessment 62
»
VII. DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES 67
A. Statutory Requirements/Response Objectives 67
B. Technology and Alternative Development 72
VIII. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 76
IX. SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
OF ALTERNATIVES 85
A, Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment .... 87
B. Compliance with ARARs 88
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod,fm iti 09/15/95
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Title Page No.
C. Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence 88
D. Reduction in Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume of
Contaminants 90
E. Short-Term Effectiveness 90
F. Implementability 92
G. Cost 93
H. State Acceptance 94
I. Community Acceptance 94
X. THE SELECTED REMEDY 95
A Methodology for Cleanup Goal Determination 95
B. Groundwater Cleanup Goals 97
C. Soil Cleanup Goals 97
D. Sediment Cleanup Goals 98
E. Description of Remedial Components 99
XL STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS 107
A The Selected Remedy is Protective of Human Health
and the Environment 107
B. The Selected Remedy Attains ARARs 108
C. The Selected Remedial Action is Cost Effective 109
D. The Selected Remedy Utilizes Permanent Solutions and
Alternative Treatment or Resource Recovery Technologies
to the Maximum Extent Practicable 112
E. The Selected Remedy Satisfies the Preference for Treatment
Which Permanently and Significantly Reduces the Toxicity,
Mobility, or Volume of the Hazardous Substances as a
Principal Element 112
XII. DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 114
XIII. STATE ROLE 115
XTV. REFERENCES/GLOSSARY R-l/ACR-1
APPENDICES
A, Tables
B. Declaration of Concurrence
C. Responsiveness Summary
D. Administrative Record Index
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3iwl.fm IV 09/15/95
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page No.
1 Investigation Report Summary A-l
2 Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds
and Metals Soil Sample Results — Site 31 A-4
3 Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds
and Metals Soil Sample Results — Site 33 A-6
4 Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds
and Metals Soil Sample Results — Site 35 A-8
5 Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds
and Metals Soil Sample Results — Site 38 A-10
6 Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds
and Metals Soil Sample Results — Site 39 A-12
7 Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds
Composite Groundwater Sample Results — Sites 32 and 36 A-14
8 Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds
Composite Groundwater Sample Results — Sites 34 and 39 A-15
9 Conceptual Model Data Summary A-17
10 Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics
and Total Metals Surface Water Analytical Results — Upper '
Newfields Ditch A-19
11 Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and
Metals Sediment Analytical Results — Upper Newfields Ditch A-21
12 Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics
and Total Metals Surface Water Analytical Results — Upper
Grafton Ditch A-23
13 Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics
and Metals Sediment Analytical Results — Upper Grafton
Ditch A-24
14 Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium A-26
15 Most Reasonable Maximally Exposed Receptor
(RME)/Other Primary Potential Receptors and Potential
Exposure Routes '.. . . A-34
16 Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices A-35
17 Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
Short-tailed Shrew — Site 33 A-42
18 Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
Short-tailed Shrew — Site 34 A-43
19 Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
Short-tailed Shrew — Site 39 A-44
20 Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
Robin — Site 33 A-45
21 Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for. the
Robin — Site 34 '. A-46
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.fm V 09/15/95
-------
LIST OF TABLES
(Continued)
Table No. Title Page No.
22 Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
Robin — Site 39 A-48
23 Summary of Hazard Quotients for Surface Water and
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Upper Newfields Ditch A-49
24 Summary of Hazard Quotients for Surface Water and
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Upper Grafton Ditch A-50
25 Comparison of Sediment Concentrations to NOAA Biological
* Effect Levels for Upper Newfields Ditch A-51
26 Comparison of Interstitial Water Concentrations for Upper
Newfields Ditch Sediment and Toxicity Values A-52
27 Comparison of Sediment Concentrations to NOAA Biological Effect
Levels for Upper Grafton Ditch A-53
28 Comparison of Interstitial Water Concentrations Upper for
Grafton Ditch Sediment and Toxicity Values A-54
29 Alternatives Retained for Detailed Analysis — Stage 4 A-55
30 Alternatives Retained for Detailed Analysis A-56
31 Selection of Groundwater Cleanup Goals — Organics A-57
32 Selection of Groundwater Cleanup Goals — Inorganics A-58
33 Soil Cleanup Goals A-59
34 Ecological-Based Remedial Objectives for Upper Newfields Ditch
Sediment A-60
35 Ecological-Based Remedial Objectives for Upper Grafton Ditch
Sediment A-61
36 ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment
With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal; Source Area and GMZ
Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal
Treatment Using Greensand Filtration, Air Stripping, and Carbon
Adsorption at Two Treatment Faculties; Subsurface Groundwater
Recharge; and Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to
Prohibit Future Residential Use A-62
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title Page No.
1 General Locations of IRP Zones and Sites 3
2 Areas of Investigation 5
3 Delineated Wetlands 7
4 Lower Sand and Glacial Till Fades 25
5 Geomorphic Features of the Newington Peninsula 28
6 Potential Source Area Map 33
7 Composite Groundwater Plume and Conceptual Model
Cross Section Map 45
8 Site 32/36 Conceptual Model 47
9 Site 39 Conceptual Model Illustration 49
10 Haven Well Conceptual Model Illustration 53
11 Surface Water Organics — Upper Newfields and Upper
Grafton Ditches 55
12 Areas Requiring Remediation 73
13 Remedial Process Flow Sheet — The Selected Remedy
(SC-4/MM-2A) 101
14 Collection and Treatment System for The Selected Remedy 105
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.fm vii 09/15/95
-------
DECLARATION
SITE NAME AND LOCATION
Zone 3, Pease Air Force Base (Pease AFB), Rockingham County, New Hampshire
STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE
This Record of Decision (ROD) presents a selected remedial action designed to protect
human .and ecological receptors in Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH. Zone 3 sites included in this
document are as follows: Sites 19 (Upper Newfields Ditch), 20 (Upper Grafton Ditch), 31
(Building 244), 32 ( Building 113), 33 (Building 229), 34 (Building 222), 35 (Building 226),
36 (Building 119), 38 (Building 120), 39 (Building 227), and 42 (Building 123). This ROD
was developed in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 USC Section 9601 et seq.) as amended by
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, and the National
Contingency Plan (NCP) (40 CFR Part 300). Through this document, the Air Force plans
to remedy the threat to human health, public welfare, or the environment posed by
contaminated media (soil, groundwater, sediment) in Zone 3. This decision is based on the
Administrative Record for the zone. The Administrative Record for Pease AFB is located
at Building 43 at Pease AFB (61 International Drive). The Administrative Record Index
as it applies to Zone 3 is provided in Appendix D.
The State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) concurs
with the selected remedy.
ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE
Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from Zone 3 soils, groundwater, and
sediment, if not addressed by implementing the response action selected in this ROD, may
present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the
environment.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.fm viii 09/15/95
-------
DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY
The selected remedy for Zone 3 will protect human health, welfare, and the environment
by minimizing the leaching of contaminants from soil and sediment to groundwater; reducing
contaminant concentrations in source area groundwater; and controlling the flow of
contaminant plumes to prevent them from migrating outside the zone.
The selected remedy includes the excavation of soil and sediment associated with Sites 33,
38,39, Upper Newfields Ditch, and Upper Grafton Ditch. The excavated soil and sediment
will be treated and/or disposed of off-base at an asphalt batching facility, a Subtitle D
landfill, or a RCRA Treatment, Storage, and/or Disposal (TSD) facility, as deemed
appropriate based upon waste characterization.
The selected remedy also includes groundwater extraction at Sites 34,35,39, and the aircraft
parking apron area for source area remediation as well as migration control. Contaminated
groundwater will be extracted via recovery well and collection trench systems and will be
treated at two groundwater treatment plants (GWTPs) in Zone 3. Existing GWTPs will be
upgraded to include inorganics pretreatment and organics treatment. Treated groundwater
will be discharged at Pease AFB via subsurface recharge and/or surface application. The
dissolved-phase contaminant plume emanating from the Site 32/36 source area will be
allowed to naturally attenuate and biodegrade. In the event that natural attenuation does
not meet expectations, additional remedial measures will be implemented.
»
The Air Force has determined that no action is necessary under CERCLA to ensure the
protection of human health and the environment at Sites 31 and 42.
STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with
federal and state requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the
remedial action, and is cost-effective. This remedy uses permanent solutions and alternative
treatment technologies to the maximum extent practicable. The determination will reflect
MK01\WT:00628026.004\zone3iod.fm IX 09/13/95
-------
the requirement of CERCLA 120(b)(i) that states "Remedial actions, in which treatment
which permanently and significantly reduces the volume, toxicity or mobility of hazardous
•substances, pollutants, or contaminants is a principal element, are to be preferred over
remedial alternatives not involving such treatment." A review will be conducted by the Air
Force, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the NHDES every 5 years
after completion of the remedial action until such time that the groundwater in Zone 3
meets cleanup standards. No actions are necessary under CERCLA to ensure the protection
of human health and the environment at Sites 31 and 42, and no 5-year reviews are
necessary for those sites.
The foregoing represents the selection of a remedial action by the Air Force and EPA New
England, with concurrence of NHDES.
EPA New England,
Concur and recommend for immediate implementation:
Date:
Director, Air Force Base Conversion Agency '
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
. Itltodi. _ Date: Qti ^
•Xinda M. Murphy / A /
Director, Waste Management Division
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.fm X 09/15/95
-------
RECORD OF DECISION SUMMARY
I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION
Pease Air Force Base (AFB) is a National Priorities List (NPL) site consisting of numerous
areas of contamination. The former base is located in the Town of Newington and the City
of Portsmouth, both of which are in Rockingham County, New Hampshire. As shown in
Figure 1, Pease AFB occupies approximately 4,365 acres and is located on a peninsula in
southeastern New Hampshire. The peninsula is bounded on the west and southwest by
Great Bay, on the northwest by Little Bay, and on the north and northeast by the Piscataqua
River.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses sources of contamination and management-of-
migration control in Zone 3. Zone 3 is located in the central portion of the former Pease
AFB, and occupies approximately 440 acres. The zone contains approximately 30 buildings
with adjacent paved parking areas and network of roads, and the flightline area. A large
section of Zone 3 covers the flightline area of the base, which includes portions of the
runway, aircraft parking apron, and the grassy infield between the aircraft parking apron and
the runway. The aircraft parking apron is a major feature of the base, covering nearly one
third of the zone. The primary base water supply well (Haven well) is located within Zone
3 on the grassy infield area.
Zone 3 contains nine sites and three surface water drainages that have been investigated
under the Installation Restoration Program (IRP): Site 19 (Upper Newfields Ditch), Site
20 (Upper Grafton Ditch), Site 21 (Mclntyre Brook), Site 31 (Building 244), Site 32
(Building 113), Site 33 (Building 229), Site 34 (Bunding 222), Site 35 (Building 226), Site
36 (Building 119), Site 38 (Building 120), Site 39 (Building 227), and Site 42 (Building 123).
' Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch (east of Portsmouth Avenue) will be addressed
under a separate decision document. The source areas at Sites 34 and 32/36 are also being
addressed under separate RODs. Zone 3 also contains 12 sites that have been managed
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 1 09/15/95
-------
under the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Program and will not be addressed in this
ROD. All IRP and UST sites located within Zone 3 are shown in Figure 2.
At the beginning of World War II, an airport at the present Pease AFB location was used
by the U.S. Navy. The Air Force assumed control of the site in 1951, and construction of
the facility was completed in 1956. Various quantities of fuels, oils, solvents, lubricants, and
protective coatings were used at the base, and releases of contaminants into the environment
occurred.
*
In December 1988, Pease AFB was selected as one of 86 military installations to be closed
by the Secretary of Defense's Commission on Base Realignment and Closure. The base was
closed as an active military reservation on 31 March 1991. The New Hampshire Air
National Guard (NHANG) remains at the airfield and uses some of the existing facilities.
The remainder of the reservation has been divided among the Department of the Interior
through an intergovernmental conveyance, the State of New Hampshire's Pease
Development Authority (PDA) in the form of a long-term lease (in anticipation of a deeded
transfer in the future), and the Air Force.
The current land uses at the former Pease AFB are institutional, woodland, agricultural,
abandoned land, and residential (currently unoccupied). Commercial and residential areas
are located off-base along Spaulding Turnpike, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the
Pease AFB eastern boundary, and Interstate 1-95, which is located along the southeastern
base boundary. The largest commercial complex is a shopping mall located on the eastern
side of Spaulding Turnpike.
Five areas of wooded wetlands are scattered throughout Zone 3, separated by buildings and
roadways: between Building 222 and Dover Avenue; east of Building 123; northwest of
Building 229; east of Building 249; and the area east of Portsmouth Avenue where it meets
Newfields Ditch. Delineated wetlands for Zone 3 are presented in Figure 3. Because Pease
AFB was a U.S. military installation, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\iooe3KXt»« 2 09/15/95
-------
E7 PEASE tn
BOUNDARY_, .<*
LISTING OF CURRENT IRP SITES
SITE NAME • (ABBREVIATION)
SITE HAVE - (ABBREVIATION)
SITE NAME - (ABBREVIATION)
Landlilll (IF-1)
LandliD 2 . (tF-2)
Landfill 3 (LF-3)
Landtill 4 (LF-4)
Undlilt 5 (LF.5I
Landfill 6 |LF-E)
Fire Oepsrvnenl Training Area 1 (FDTA-1)
Fira Department Training Area 2 (FDTA-2)
Construction RuWte Dunp I (CRD>1)
Leaded Fuel Tank Sludge Disposal Area (LFTSl
FMS Equipment Ctoarxng Sile (FM5)
Munigora Mainlenanace Area
Building 410 • PCB Sf*
Construction RuM* Dump 2
Munitions Residue Burial Area
Burn Area 1
ButWng244
Building 229
Bulking 222 Jel Engine Tesl Cell
Building 226
(MMA)
(CRD-2)
(MRBA)
(8A-I)
(JETC)
Bum Area 2 (BA<2)
BuilnglJO
Building 227
Auto HoMy Snop (AHS)
GtJI Course Maintenance Area (GCMA)
Mclntyre Road Drum Disposal Area (MP.OOA)
Paint Can Disposal Area (PCOA)
OWJet En^ne Tesl Sland IOJETSI
RR Tracks Herbicides (RRTH)
Goll Course Pesticide Area (Minng/Skxage) jGCPA)
EOD Burn Detonation Area
uo tooo
SCALE IN FEET
Bala Mm Source.
D*lan «•• ol prioioortfnnMtrc complition of
PAFB from ••nn pTTOtogfiohy daad t V23&7.
LEGEND:
Areal oiient ot IRP Zone
IRP Site
Zone 3
Stage 4, Record of Decision
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
FIGURE 1
GENERAL LOCATIONS OF THE IRP
ZONES AND SITES
-------
. _. .
LISTINO OF ZONE 3 IBP AND UST PROGRAM SITES
iflPMtnumbw
UST Program M* nurttar
IRP«M
UST Program sin mvMtQMiOfW
2on»S
Stag* 4, Record o( Dcctaton
PMW AkFora* taM. New HwiptMra
FIGURE 2
AREAS OF INVESTIGATION
:-: UnpMdnxa ,_;.
-------
Roads( asphalt/paved)
Unpaved roads and trails
Buildings
Fence
PORTSMOUTH AVENUE
•V'. DOVER AVENUE S ,-
SCALE M FEET
Mtp Sourc*.
D«uil VM oJ pnotogi
PAF8 trom Mn« oho
Zone3
St*Q» 4, Record ol Decision
Peace Air Force Base, New Hampshire
FIGURE 3
DEUNEATED WETLANDS
-------
did not delineate floodplains at the base. Therefore, it is not known whether Zone 3 is
within a 100-year floodplain. There are no records indicating that flooding has occurred at
Pease AFB. Zone 3 surface water runoff is almost entirely collected by and routed through
the base storm drain system and a series of manmade ditches, which are directed to natural
drainages outside of Zone 3. Much of the runoff from the flightline is guided through the
storm drain system into Mclntyre Brook, southwest of the flightline, which ultimately
discharges into Great Bay. A series of three east-northeast-trending ditches drains the area
east of Building 222 into Newfields Ditch and Grafton Ditch. The Site 34 (Building 222)
Test Cell Ditch (Upper Grafton Ditch) drains into the Dover Avenue storm sewer and
discharges into Grafton Ditch southeast of Zone 3.
Newfields Ditch drains the area between Buildings 113 and 119 and directs surface water
out of Zone 3 to the east, discharging to Hodgsons Brook, and ultimately discharging into
the Piscataqua River. Surface drainageways at Pease AFB flow radially away from the
center of the peninsula, toward Great Bay to the west, Little Bay to the northwest and
north, and the Piscataqua River to the east. Great Bay, Little Bay, and the Piscataqua River
are all tidally influenced and, consequently, are subjected to semidiurnal variation in water
levels.
A more detailed description of the zone, including zone geology and hydrogeology, is
presented in the Zone 3 Draft Final Remedial Investigation (RI) Report (G-629).
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3roA*» 9 09/15/95
-------
II. ZONE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
A. Zone Use and Response History
Most of the repair and maintenance of aircraft and related equipment occurred at facilities
along the flightline in Zone 3. As a result, Zone 3 has been an area of numerous small fuel
spills, spent solvent and waste oil spills, discharges of shop-generated wastes into storm
drains, and suspected UST leaks. Fuels such as gasoline, diesel fuel, and JP-4, and solvents
such as trichloroethene (TCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), tetrachloroethene (PCE),
carbon tetrachloride, and stoddard solvent (PD-680) were commonly used at Zone 3 sites.
IRP investigations in Zone 3 have focused on the areas around eight buildings (Buildings
113, 119, 120, 222, 226, 227, 229, and 244), in addition to investigations along the aircraft
parking apron. The principal surface drainages, Upper Grafton Ditch, Mclntyre Brook, and
Newfields Ditch, also have been investigated.
The following is a brief summary of the history of each site within Zone 3. More detailed
information may be found in Section 2 of the Zone 3 Draft Final RI Report (G-629). All
tables for this report are presented in Appendix A.
Aircraft Parking Apron
The aircraft parking apron encompasses much of Zone 3 not otherwise designated as a
particular IRP site. The aircraft parking apron includes the aircraft parking area, the
refueling area, and the areas used for maintenance activities. A fuel hydrant system extends
beneath the aircraft parking apron from pump houses located between the runway and
aircraft parking apron. Periodic spills of fewer than 100 gallons were reported to have
occurred, and one significant spill of more than 3,000 gallons of JP-4 was reported to have
occurred in the early 1970s. Low levels of contamination have been found, primarily in the
soil and groundwater beneath the flightline; the contamination consists of petroleum
products and chlorinated solvents believed to be present as a result of routine operations
performed on the flightline.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 10 09/15/95
-------
Sites 19/21 (Newfields Ditch/Mclntyre Brook)
Newfields Ditch is a manmade drainage ditch that extends from Building 222 eastward to
Hodgsons Brook. The ditch receives surface runoff from areas east of the aircraft parking
apron. Mclnfyre Brook is a natural stream, altered during base airfield construction, which
flows westward from the runway out to Great Bay. The brook receives outflow from the
storm drain system, which collects most of the runoff from the flightline. Until 1974, when
a bypass line was constructed, wastewater from the Building 227 floor drains also flowed
into the flightline storm drain system that fed into Mclntyre Brook.
The section of Newfields Ditch west of Portsmouth Avenue (Upper Newfields Ditch) is
addressed in this document. Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch (east of
Portsmouth Avenue) are being addressed in a separate ROD.
Sites 20/34 (Upper Grafton Ditch/Building 222)
The Jet Engine Test Cell (JETC, Building 222) was constructed in the late 1960s and had
been in operation from 1970 until closure of the facility in 1992. The JETC was used to test
the performance of jet engines over complete power ranges, including engine idle, military
power, and afterburner. Coolant water flow rates generated during a test could range from
10 to 100 gpm, with a single test using 3,000 gallons or more of water. Prior to 1989, all
liquid generated from activities at the JETC, which potentially contained polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), fuel, hydraulic fluid, and solvents, drained to Upper Grafton
Ditch (also referred to as the Test Cell Ditch). The test cell bay effluent was'discharged
to an oil/water separator prior to its discharge into the Test Cell Ditch, while the effluent
from the exhaust stack was discharged directly to the Test Cell Ditch. After modification
of the test cell in December 1989, only the effluent from the washdown of the intake stack
and the building stormwater drains discharged to the Test Cell Ditch. The rest of the
effluent was placed in containers for disposal. The other areas of interest at Site 34 are the
sites of the former 5,000-gallon UST (used to store jet fuel), the two No. 2 heating fuel
USTs, and the oil/water separator. All the USTs at Site 34 were removed in September 1992.
MKOI\RPT:00628026.004\zone3«xU« 11 09/15/95
-------
Several Interim Remedial Measures (IRMs) have been performed at Site 34. These
measures include sediment removal from the Test Cell Ditch and installation and operation
of groundwater extraction wells and a pilot groundwater treatment plant (GWTP). The
purpose of the groundwater extraction system is to provide management of migration of the
Site 34 dissolved contaminant plume.
The Site 34 source area, which consists of contaminated soils, has been addressed in a
separate ROD. The management of Site 34 contaminated groundwater is addressed in this
document.*
Site 31 (Building 244, Consolidated Aircraft Maintenance Squadron)
Building 244 is located east of the aircraft parking apron and is known as the Consolidated
Aircraft Maintenance Squadron (CAMS) building. The site was used for jet engine
maintenance and repair from 1955 to 1965. The primary area of interest is a former 1,200-
gallon concrete UST, located adjacent to the building, which received discharge from the
building floor drains. The tank, which was removed in 1991, held waste solvents
(predominantly TCE) that were used as degreasers for aircraft engine parts.
Site 32/36 (Buildings 113/119)
Building 113 (Site 32) was formerly used for aircraft maintenance activities. A 1,200-gallon
concrete UST was formerly located near the northeastern corner of the building. The UST
received waste solvents, including TCE, from engine degreasing operations from 1955 to
1965. Sometime after 1977, the UST was filled with sand; the tank was excavated and
removed by the Air Force in 1988. During tank removal activities, an underground overflow
discharge pipe associated with the tank was discovered. The pipe and 441 tons of
contaminated soil from the area surrounding the tank and discharge pipe were removed in
1990 as part of an IRM. In addition, a pilot GWTP and groundwater extraction system was
designed and constructed to provide some control of the migration of contaminated
groundwater at the site.
MK01\RFT:00«8026.004\zone3rod.sa 12 09/15/95
-------
Building 119 (Site 36) was used for jet engine and engine accessory maintenance from 1956
to 1990. A hazardous materials storage area (HMSA) and an oil rack were located on the
southern side of the building, and surface soils in this area are stained. An area of stressed
vegetation and stained soil was noted close to the rear door at the eastern corner of
Building 119. The area (source 36b), covering approximately 60 ft2, is relatively flat and
consists of grass lawn bordered by the building's concrete sidewalk. Conversations with
personnel at the building indicated that some waste solvent products from Building 119 may
have been discharged to the ground in this area.
Wastewater generated at Building 119 was conveyed from the floor drainage system to the
Building 226 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant (IWTP) (1956 to 1974) or the Building
226 oil/water separator (1974 to 1991) via a buried pipeline. The wastewater potentially
contained TCE wastes. Between 1981 and 1982, during construction activities on Dover
Avenue, the pipeline ruptured, releasing an estimated 5,000 to 10,000 gallons of untreated
wastewater into the construction trench (source 36a). The wastewater was pumped out of
the excavation for treatment, and the trench was backfilled with native soil.
The source areas at Sites 32 and 36, which consist of residual dense nonaqueous-phase
liquid (DNAPL) and volatile organic compound (VOC)-contaminated soils at Site 32 and
metals- and VOC-contaminated soils at Site 36, are the subject of a separate ROD.
Contaminated groundwater that has migrated from these source areas is addressed in this
document.
Site 33 (Building 229)
Building 229 (Site 33) consists of the Aircraft Maintenance Squadron (AMS) hangar.
Operations in the building involved the cleaning and repair of aircraft fuel systems and
tanks. In 1964, an oil/water separator was installed to receive wastes from the building
floor drains. Activities of concern at the site included past use of TCE and a possible fuel/
oil spill near the building. The principal area of concern is the oil/water separator and
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxLsa 13 09/15/95
-------
associated sump at the southwestern comer of the building, which was removed in October
1991.
Site 35 (Building 226)
Building 226 (Site 35), referred to as the IWTP, was built in 1956 to house a dissolved air
flotation (DAF) water treatment system. The system operated from 1956 to 1975,
processing aircraft washwater and wastewater from Buildings 119 and 227. During this
period, treated water was discharged to the sanitary sewer system. In 1973, an oil/water
separator was installed next to Building 226 to receive the wastewater from Buildings 119
and 227 (replacing the DAF treatment system). Beginning in 1974, wastewater that passed
through the oil/water separator was discharged into the storm sewer system. In 1989, the
oil/water separator discharge was rerouted to the base sanitary sewer system. During 1992,
Building 226 was demolished, including its foundation, and the grassy area surrounding the
foundation, between Dover Avenue and Building 227, was graded and covered with an
asphalt parking lot. A concrete recovery extraction well was installed in the southeastern
corner of the foundation excavation to allow for potential free product recovery.
Other areas investigated at Site 35 include the former 15,000-gallon UST and the HMSA.
The UST was used to store solvents and was located next to the oil/water separator
between Buildings 226 and 227. The UST was removed, along with the oil/water separator,
in October 1991. The HMSA was used for temporary drum storage between 1982 and 1990
and was located on the asphalt area between Building 226 and Dover Avenue.
Site 38 (Building 120)
Building 120 (Site 38) consists of several maintenance shops that were used for a variety of
purposes when the base was in operation. The shops include a sheet metal shop, paint shop,
welding shop, battery shop, and a nondestructive testing area. Of interest at Site 38 are the
drum storage area and the floor drain pipeline adjacent to the eastern corner of the
building.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod^a 14 09/15/95
-------
Site 39 (Building 227)
Building 227 (Site 39) includes the largest hangar at Pease AFB, which served as a major
maintenance area for aircraft. The hangar was used for a variety of general maintenance
activities, including degreasing, paint stripping, minor repairs, and washdown of aircraft.
The northern quarter of the hangar housed a wash rack area and an HWSA for 55-gallon
drums. The floor drams in that area were connected into the Building 226IWTP (1956 to
1974), and, later, the oil/water separator (1974 to 1991). From 1956 to 1974, the floor
drains for the other sections of the building (along with the roof drains) connected directly
into the flightiine storm sewer system, which discharges into Mclntyre Brook. In 1974, a
low-flow bypass line was constructed to connect these drains with the Building 226 oil/water
separator. From 1974 to 1991, wastewater from Building 227 floor drains emptied into the
flightiine storm sewers only during rainstorms, when the wastewater was highly diluted. In
October 1991, the floor drainage system in the building was cleaned and sealed with
concrete and hydraulic cement. Of concern at this site are the soil and groundwater
adjacent to and beneath the building. Contaminant sources are suspected to be solvent, oil,
and fuel spills on the floor or outside of the building, and wastewater discharged to the
flightiine storm sewers from the building floor drainage system.
Installation of a dual-phase groundwater and soil vapor extraction and treatment system at
Building 227 was completed in September 1992. The system operated from December 1992
through June 1993, as discussed in the Earth Technology Corporation (ETC) Hangar 227
Treatability Test Final Report (G-648).
»
Site 42 (Building 123, Refuse-to-Energy Plant)
Building 123 [Refuse-to-Energy Plant (RTE)] was constructed in 1981 by the City of
Portsmouth, and was operated at the base from July 1982 to April 1987 incinerating refuse
collected from the City of Portsmouth, Pease AFB, the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, and
several surrounding communities and private companies. The heat generated at the RTE
MK01\WT:00628026.004\ion«3io«»i« 15 . 09/15/95
-------
was used to generate steam for the heating system at the base. Of interest at Site 42 are
a petroleum UST, the incinerator ash storage area, and an oil/water separator.
The results of an investigation focused on Site 42 were presented in the Final Portsmouth
Refuse-to-Energy Plant Site Inspection Report, by ICF Kaiser Engineering, Inc. (ICF-KE)
(G-310). A 20,000-gallon fuel oil UST was removed by the City of Portsmouth in August
1991. A 1,000-gallon oil/water separator is still in place.
Installation Restoration Program
In 1976, the Department of Defense (DOD) developed a comprehensive IRP to assess and
control the migration of environmental contamination that may have resulted from past
operations at DOD facilities. In 1983, an IRP Phase I Problem Identification/Records
Search (G-84) was conducted at Pease AFB to assess whether potential hazardous waste
sites warranted further investigation. Based on the results of that investigation, further study
was deemed necessary at several facilities adjacent to the flightline parking apron. A Phase
II pre-survey was conducted to obtain sufficient information to develop a scope of work and
cost estimate for a more detailed study. The pre-survey was submitted to the Air Force in
1984. With the passage of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
in 1986 and its inclusion of requirements specific to federal facilities, the Air Force revised
its program to parallel the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) approach
required under Comprehensive Environmental Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).
RIs were conducted in accordance with CERCLA, as amended by SARA, and all relevant
guidance, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Guidance for
Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies under CERCLA (Interim Final,
October 1988, OSWER Directive 9355.3-01) and other EPA guidance for conducting RI/FSs
under CERCLA, at 19 IRP sites at Pease AFB. The investigations in Zone 3 were
conducted in four stages between June 1984 and July 1993. A summary of investigation
reports for sites within Zone 3 is included in Table 1. Data collection during the latter part
of Stage 4 was performed to complete the baseline risk assessment and Zone 3 FS. A more
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodja 16 09/15/95
-------
detailed description of Zone 3 history is presented in Subsections 133 and 2.1 through 2.4
of the Zone 3 Draft Final RI Report (G-629).
B. Enforcement History
The enforcement history relative to Pease AFB, including Zone 3, is summarized as follows:
• In 1976, DOD devised a comprehensive IRP to assess and control
environmental contamination that may have resulted from past operations and
disposal practices at DOD facilities.
• In June 1980, DOD issued a Defense Environmental Quality Program Policy
Memorandum (DEQPPM) requiring identification of past hazardous waste
disposal sites on DOD agency installations. The DEQPPM was issued in
response to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976,
and in anticipation of CERCLA.
• On 14 July 1989, Pease AFB was proposed for addition to the NPL. The
effective date of addition was 21 February 1990.
• On 24 April 1991, the Air Force, EPA, and New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services (NHDES) signed a Federal Facility Agreement (FFA)
establishing the protocol and timetable for conducting the RI/FS and
remedial design/remedial action processes at Pease AFB.
As part of the timetable established in the FFA, the Air Force, in an effort to streamline
activities, designed a Basewide Strategy Plan for conducting an RI/FS investigation. This
Strategy Plan grouped the sites at Pease AFB into seven zones or operable units based on
geographic location, potential receptors, and potential future uses. RI/FS reports were
prepared for each zone.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3KXlM 17 09/15/95
-------
HI. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Throughout the history of IRP activities at Pease AFB, the local community has been
actively involved and informed. EPA, NHDES, and the Air Force have kept the community
and other interested parties apprised of zone activities through informational meetings, fact
sheets, press releases, and public meetings.
In January 1991, the Air Force released a community relations plan that outlined a program
to address community concerns and keep citizens informed about and involved in remedial
activities at the base. This plan was updated and reissued in November 1994.
Numerous fact sheets have been released by the Air Force throughout the IRP at Pease
AFB. These fact sheets are intended to keep public and other concerned parties apprised
,of developments and milestones in the Pease IRP. The Zone 3 fact sheets released to date
are:
Fact Sheet
Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Update
Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Update
Interim Groundwater Treatment — Sites 8, 32/36, and 34
Proposed Plan for Site 32/36 Source Area
Proposed Plan for Site 34 Source Area
Summary of Zone 3 Proposed Plan
Release Date
October 1991
December 1992
January 1993
March 1993
March 1993
May 1995
A complete information repository containing documents relating to the Pease AFB IRP is
maintained at Pease AFB in Building 43. The Administrative Record, containing all
documents that support the remedies selected for Pease AFB, also is located at Pease AFB
in Building 43. An index of the Administrative Record is maintained at EPA New England
in Boston, Massachusetts.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa
18
09/15/95
-------
IV. SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE ACTION
This ROD addresses both source control and management-of-migration measures at Zone
3. The actions being taken in the Zone 3 area at Pease AFB are compatible with other
actions being taken or planned at other zones or areas of Pease AFB. The remedial
alternative developed for Zone 3 was designed to reduce potential human health and
environmental risks identified in the risk assessment .for Zone 3. The results of the risk
assessment, which are presented in the Zone 3 Draft Final RI Report (G-629) and are
summarized in Section VI of this ROD, form the basis for concluding that contaminants in
soil and groundwater associated with activities at Site 31 do not pose unacceptable risk
(current or future) to human and ecological receptors and remedial actions under CERCLA
are not required. Consequently, no further action is proposed for Site 31 under CERCLA.
In addition, the results of the investigation performed by ICF-KE at Site 42 indicated that
no release from Site 42 occurred, and no further action was warranted under the CERCLA
process (G-310). Therefore, Site 42 is not discussed further in this ROD.
The remedial alternative developed for Zone 3 addresses potential human health and
environmental risks associated with soil, groundwater, and sediment at various sites in Zone
3. Source control activities involve remediation of contaminated soil at Sites 33, 38, and
39, groundwater at Sites 34, 35, and 39, and sediment at Upper Newfields and Upper
Grafton Ditches. Management-of-migration activities via groundwater extraction and
treatment or institutional controls address dissolved-phase groundwater contamination south
of Sites 34 and 39, in the aircraft parking apron area, and outside hydraulic and physical
•
containment area at Sites 32 and 36.
The selected remedy was developed to reduce potential leaching of contaminants from
source area soil and sediment to groundwater and surface water, respectively, and to control
migration of dissolved-phase contamination in groundwater. In summary, the remedy
provides for the following tasks:
NDC01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxU« 19 09/15/95
-------
• Excavation of sediment exceeding cleanup goals from Upper Newfields Ditch
and Upper Grafton Ditch and off-base disposal.
• Sediment and erosion control during sediment excavation.
• Excavation of soil exceeding cleanup goals from Sites 33, 38, and 39 and off-
base treatment and/or disposal.
• Backfilling and compaction of soil and sediment excavations with clean fill.
• Land use restrictions on Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
*.
• Establishment of land use restrictions beneath Building 227; remediation of
soil would be required if the building is removed.
• Establishment of a Groundwater Management Zone (GMZ) in Zone 3 and
implementation of institutional controls to restrict future use of groundwater
in Zone 3 and limit pumping of the Haven well to prevent the interference
with contamination migration control to be implemented under the Zone 3
remedial action.
• Groundwater extraction in source areas to reduce contaminant mass and
facilitate groundwater restoration.
• Groundwater extraction to control contaminant migration and maintain the
GMZ.
• Groundwater treatment at two treatment facilities at Sites 32/36 and 34,
followed by subsurface groundwater recharge or surface application at Pease
AFB.
• Construction of recharge trenches southwest of the runway for discharge of
treated groundwater.
• Natural attenuation and biodegradation of the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating from outside of the Site 32/36 Technical Impracticability
(TI) containment area. In the event that long-term monitoring suggests that
natural attenuation is not performing according to expectations, the Air Force
would implement additional remedial measures.
• Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.
• Long-term environmental monitoring.
• No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 20 09/15/95
-------
V. SUMMARY OF ZONE CHARACTERISTICS
Table 1 presents a summary of RI activity conducted in Zone 3. Based on the results of the
RI, a working conceptual model was developed that incorporates all known data concerning
Zone 3 and its vicinity, including geological, hydrogeological, and analytical data; field
measurements; and visual observations. The significant findings of the RI are presented in
this subsection.
A. Zone Geology
The bedrock geology of Zone 3 consists of the Kittery and Eliot Formations. Zone 3 is
underlain primarily by the Kittery Formation with the contact between the Kittery
Formation and the younger Eliot Formation mapped at the northwestern edge of Zone 3,
between Sites 31 and 33. The Kittery Formation is primarily massive to banded quartzite
with phyllitic quartzite interbeds. Bedding in the Kittery Formation strikes northeast and
is generally steeply dipping (60 to 80 degrees) to the northwest, but also is known to be
folded. Fractures are abundant in the shallow bedrock throughout the zone and are
predominantly oriented parallel and at high angles to the northeast-striking bedding in the
Kittery Formation.
The Eliot Formation is composed primarily of interbedded phyllite and metagraywacke.
Bedding in the Eliot Formation is typically folded, and strikes northeast with variable, but
generally steep dips to the northwest (SO to 90 degrees). The Eliot Formation is typically
moderately to strongly foliated, with foliation commonly subparallel to the bedding. Natural
fractures are typically planar or stepped, moderately rough, and commonly iron-stained
(limonite) where open.
Diabase dikes are ubiquitous throughout the region, and occur frequently across Zone 3,
especially under Site 32. Diabase dikes at Pease AFB are typically 5- to 25-foot-thick,
steeply dipping, tabular bodies and strike to the northeast Diabase dikes are commonly
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod4i . 21 09/15/95
-------
oriented at a low angle to the bedding and the dominant structural grain of the bedrock.
The spacing of the dikes is random, but ranges from a few feet, to several hundred feet.
Analysis of outcrop exposures in Zone 3 and rock core illustrates that the dominant fracture
set (N53°E, 74° NW) is oriented parallel or subparallel to planar bedding in the quartzite.
A comparison of outcrop fracture data and core fracture data indicates that trends are
consistent between the two data sets. A second, less prominent set of fractures is oriented
with a strike perpendicular to bedding and steeply dipping.
Abundant brittle fracturing is indicated in the upper 10 to 20 feet of the Kittery Formation
by the occurrence of fresh, thin quartz, calcite, and pyrite veins (filled fractures) and open
fractures in core samples. These fractures are typically smooth, planar, and variable in
orientation. Filled fractures commonly occur parallel to bedding and foliation.
The surficial materials observed across Zone 3 are subdivided into five stratigraphic units:
fill, Upper Sand (US), Marine Clay and Silt (MCS), Lower Sand (LS), and Glacial Till
(GT). Contact relations between lithologic units are variable; locally they may be either
sharp, gradational, or interbedded. The laterally discontinuous nature of lithologies suggests
facies equivalency between adjacent units, rather than simple layer-cake stratigraphy. As a
result, correlations between boreholes and contact relations are schematic and interpretive,
depending on the local distribution of borehole data. In general, the overburden thickness
varies widely across the zone, and is thinnest around areas of bedrock highs, and thickest
in areas of bedrock lows, such as near the Haven well and Site 31, where a maximum
overburden thickness of 80 feet was encountered at the western margin of the aircraft
parking apron. The overburden is absent in locations where bedrock is exposed, including
Site 34 and along Portsmouth Avenue near Building 115.
Fill deposits in Zone 3 are typically dominated by sand and gravel; however, silty and clayey
soils were locally incorporated into fill. The fill matrix has a composition identical to the
US from which it was typically derived. This material appears to be locally compacted for
engineering purposes during runway and aircraft parking apron construction, based on its
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
use for structural fill. Areas where fill deposits dominate the overburden are between
Buildings 227 and 229, on the aircraft parking apron south of Building 227, and along the
center of the runway, nearly the full length of Zone 3. An approximate 6- to 10-foot-thick
deposit of fill occurs relatively uniformly spread beneath the length of the aircraft parking
apron.
The thickness of the US unit typically varies between 5 and 10 feet throughout Zone 3. In
most areas, it is difficult to distinguish between undisturbed US deposits and fill consisting
of reworked US.
Across Zone 3, the MCS unit is widespread, but laterally discontinuous. In general, the
MCS is thickest in an area northeast of Building 116 and north of Newfields Ditch, where
the MCS is estimated to be 27 feet thick. The thickness of the MCS varies considerably.
Some of the areas of thicker MCS exist at Site 36 (20 feet), Sites 33 and 39 (15 feet), and
north of Site 38 (20 feet). The areas where the MCS is also absent are significant, as shown
in Figure 4. The MCS is absent in a relatively extensive area from the Haven well
extending northward to Site 31 and then north and northeast of Site 72. The MCS is also
absent in several areas (e.g., Site 34) where the bedrock is shallow or actually outcrops.
Many of the thicker occurrences of the MCS coincide with bedrock lows.
Several different fades of MCS are present: sandy gravelly, silty with sand, silty, clayey,
clayey with silt, and clayey with sand. The variability of the MCS fades and the distribution
of sites across Zone 3 are such that some sites (e.g., Site 31) have no MCS present, whereas
*
others (e.g., Site 32/36) have thick (20 feet) MCS units consisting of predominantly dayey
fades. The potential hydrogeological significance of the variable fades is that the MCS
fades vary in-their potential to restrict vertical migration of groundwater and, hence,
dissolved contaminants. The areas where the MCS is thin, laterally discontinuous, or not
present at all have a significant bearing on the potential movement of contaminants between
the saturated US deposits and deeper hydrostratigraphic units. In areas where the MCS
fades are predominantly sandy and gravelly, the potential for the MCS unit to act as an
aquitard is minimal, whereas at locations where the MCS unit is thick and the fades are
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 23 09/15/95
-------
predominantly clayey and silly, the potential for the MCS unit to act as an aquitard is
substantial.
The LS and GT units have been combined for the purposes of this discussion. Evaluation
of lithologic logs and grain size data throughout the zone suggests that the LS and GT may
be treated as a single unit texturally and hydrologically. In this report, they are combined
as the LS/GT unit. In Zone 3, the LS/GT unit is typically thicker and more laterally
continuous than the overlying units. It has a maximum observed thickness of 80 feet near
the Haven well. The US and LS cannot be differentiated easily when no MCS is present.
Thus, in the area of the Haven well and to the north the material is mapped as US/LS
undifferentiated.
The isopach map of LS/GT indicates three other areas of notable thickness: around Site 31
(60 feet), south of Site 34 (40 feet), and south of Newfields Ditch on the eastern side of
Portsmouth Avenue (45 feet). Generally, LS/GT thickness ranges from approximately 55
to 10 feet eastward across the zone.
Three fades have been delineated with the LS/GT in Zone 3: outwash (OW), stratified
recessional moraine (SRM), and GT. Figure 4 presents the distribution of the LS/GT fades
across Zone 3. The OW consists primarily of thick, relatively homogeneous sands and
gravels that are known to be highly transmissive. OW covers a broad area beneath the
Haven well and to the north and west of Site 31. Another band of potential OW material
is delineated fr,om Site 34 through Site 35, encompassing Building 229 (Site 33), then
sweeping north of Building 120 under Building 122 and directly across Site 32/36. This is
a subgladal channel that cuts through the SRM. The SRM fades is finer grained and less
homogeneous than tfie OW fades and is generally less transmissive than the OW.
The GT fades consists of nonstratified gravelly sands and silts, with a fine-grained matrix.
The GT is considerably more compact and probably less transmissive than the other two
fades. The GT fades appears in several narrow bands across Zone 3. One runs from west
of Site 34 beneath Buildings 227 (Site 39) and 229 (Site 33), beneath Site 81, then to the
MK01\RPT:Od628026.004\zone3rod^a 24 09/15/95
-------
dMV 01WM MMtV VM IIMVlM ttff
tlliMlllAMrt
•-
i' j STRATIFIED SAND ft
Ml ' I ,*J"l ' '
J V IT^J-V ^;, .-
FIGURE 4
LOWER SAND AND GUfilM. TBJ. FACC8
-------
northeast beneath Site 72. Another band of GT runs under Building 119 (Site 34) and
Building 113 (Site 32). Textural differences suggest that the GT is less permeable than the
LS/GT fades, thus the GT may act as an aquitard.
Based on the geologic model for the Newington Peninsula (see Figure 5), the Zone 3
geomorphic features were formed and the sediments deposited in a glacial-marine
environment. The critical aspects of the Zone 3 geombrphology include the subaqueous fan
along the southwestern edge of the zone, which includes the Haven well aquifer; the glacial
delta located at the northwest corner of Zone 3 where Site 31 is located; and the SRM near
the center of the zone where most of the IRP sites (e.g., Sites 32, 33, 36, and 39) are
located. The distribution of these three features and their associated sediment facies play
a major role in the Zone 3 hydrogeology and contaminant transport.
B. Zone Hydrogeology
Glacial deposits and bedrock occurring on the Newington Peninsula have been subdivided
into seven hydrostratigraphic units. In this document, the term hydrostratigraphic unit is
used to describe geologic materials of significant lateral extent that are characterized by
similar porosity and permeability, and that form the framework for a reasonably distinct
hydrologic system. The units are, in ascending order: deep bedrock; shallow bedrock;
LS/GT; MCS; US; and fill.
Within the framework of the seven hydrostratigraphic units, two hydrologic regimes or
water-bearing zones have been identified at Zone 3: the unconfined water table and the
deeper, semiconfined water-bearing unit. Although both of these hydrologic regimes may
occur in more~than one hydrostratigraphic unit, the majority of water table wells across
Zone 3 are screened in the US. Most of the wells that monitor the LS/GT or bedrock are
classified hydrologically as semiconfined. Near Sites 34, 72, and 81, the unconfined water
table is encountered within the MCS, LS/GT, or bedrock. For the purpose of this report,
wells that monitor the water table are classified as water table wells. Wells that monitor
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodia 27 09/15/95
-------
NEW
HAMPSHIRE
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
City of
Portsmouth
i
I
2000 4000
Scale in Feet
95P-4IIO
Zone 3
Stage 4, Record of Decirton
PMM Air Force Base, New Hampshire
FIGURES
GEOMORPHIC FEATURES OF THE
NEWINGTON PENINSULA
28
-------
overburden zones below the water table (even in areas where the MCS is absent) are
classified as LS/GT wells.
Most of the bedrock wells in Zone 3 monitor the semiconfined water-bearing unit below the
water table, except for places where the bedrock extends into the water table, as at Sites 34
and 65. Bedrock wells are divided into two types for the purpose of characterizing
groundwater flow in bedrock:
• Shallow bedrock — Those bedrock wells that monitor the upper 15 feet of
bedrock.
• Deep bedrock — Those bedrock wells that monitor zones below the upper 15
feet of bedrock.
Depth to water ranges between 0 and 9.5 feet below ground surface (BGS) across Zone 3.
The saturated thickness of the overburden in Zone 3 ranges from 0 to approximately 60
feet. A predominantly southeast to east flow is indicated, except in the vicinity of Building
227 and Site 34. In these areas, groundwater flow diverges eastward toward Site 32 and
westward toward Great Bay.
Zone 3 hydrographs for 1992 and 1993 show that the highest water table elevations occur
in March through April and that the lowest water table elevations occur during July through
September. Water table elevation fluctuations of 1 to 3 feet were typical during 1992 and
1993.
The groundwater contour maps for the water table and LS/GT (semiconfined overburden)
flow regimes are very similar. Because the two flow regimes have similar flow patterns and
because pumping tests suggest a high degree of hydrologic interconnection, the overburden
in Zone 3 effectively acts as a single water-bearing unit, with the MCS acting as a confining
unit only locally.
The bedrock in Zone 3 is divided into shallow and deep bedrock hydrostratigrapbic units.
The groundwater flow direction in the shallow bedrock unit is predominantly east to
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxl.sa 29 09/15/95
-------
southeast. Because of the extensive brittle fracturing and the orientation of the major
fracture sets in Zone 3, the shallow bedrock unit appears to be only slightly anisotropic
(based on pumping test data) and groundwater flow through the unit does not appear to be
controlled by the major fracture orientation.
The underlying deep bedrock is the basal hydrostratigraphic unit The predominant
direction of groundwater flow in the deep bedrock is toward the southeast. Fractures in the
bedrock decrease with depth within the deep bedrock unit and the localized movement of
groundwater is likely controlled by the northeasterly orientation of the fractures and the
formation bedding.
The area! distribution of vertical hydraulic gradients across Zone 3 indicates that, with some
exceptions, most of the zone is a recharge area (downward gradients), and Newfields Ditch
is a zonewide discharge area.
The hydraulic properties of the hydrostratigraphic units vary significantly vertically between
units and horizontally within individual units. Excluding the fine-grained fades of the MCS,
the hydrostratigraphic units with the lowest hydraulic conductivities appear to be the SRM
fades of the LS/GT (0.1 to 4.8 ft/day) and the deep bedrock (0.029 to 2.75 ft/day). The
undifferentiated sand and gravel in the OW fades near the Haven well exhibited the highest
hydraulic conductivities in Zone 3 (mean of 442 ft/day). The shallow bedrock hydraulic
conductivities ranged from 6.15 to 82.2 ft/day, making the shallow bedrock unit the primary
groundwater flow unit across most of Zone 3 (the LS/GT unit is the most transmissive unit
at Site 31 and the Haven well).
C. Zone Surface Water Hydrology
Pease AFB is located on a peninsula within the Piscataqua River drainage basin. Drainage
is radially away from the peninsula, toward Great Bay to the west, Little Bay to the
northwest and north, and the Piscataqua River to the east Great Bay, Little Bay, and the
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3ro(Ltt 30 09/15/95
-------
Piscataqua River are all tidally influenced, and are, consequently, subjected to semidiurnal
water-level variation.
The peninsula is of relatively low relief, with the runway and aircraft parking apron in Zone
3 located along the high point of the peninsula. A surface drainage divide is located along
the northeastern side of the aircraft parking apron, with runoff to the northeast of the divide
draining toward the Piscataqua River and runoff southwest of the divide draining
toward Great Bay.
The surface hydrology of Zone 3 may be characterized as consisting of general settings or
areas, each with different surface hydrology: the paved and storm-drained aircraft parking
apron and other paved areas where runoff predominates; the relatively well-drained areas
immediately adjacent to the aircraft parking apron; the poorly drained wetlands; and three
major surface drainage ditches: Mclntyre Brook, Grafton Ditch, and Newfields Ditch.
Mclntyre Brook, a channelized drainage, is located on the southwestern side of Zone 3. It
begins at a runway culvert that flows through an oil/water separator before discharging into
and forming the main channel of Mclntyre Brook. Mclntyre Brook carries most of the
surface water from the runway and aircraft parking apron and, ultimately, discharges into
Great Bay.
The headwaters of Grafton Ditch are at the JETC Ditch (see Figure 3). The JETC Ditch
discharges into a stormwater pipe that runs parallel to Dover Avenue to its point of
discharge east of the intersection of Dover Avenue and Grafton Road. Additional surface
runoff is collected in a series of stormwater drains that discharge to Grafton Ditch east of
Grafton Roadr Beyond this point, Grafton Ditch is linear and channelized as it flows
through a forested area before intersecting the natural channels of a stream that was
formerly referred to as Harveys Creek. Grafton Ditch crosses under Interstate 95 and joins
Hodgsons Brook and flows to North Mill Pond, eventually discharging into the Piscataqua
River.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 31 09/15/95
-------
Newfields Ditch originates north of Building 222 (JETC) near the edge of the aircraft
parking apron and flows in a northeasterly direction toward Dover Avenue, as shown in
Figure 3. The ditch passes through a culvert under Dover Avenue and subsequently
converges with flow from an unnamed channel that drains the central and eastern portions
of Site 32/36 near Station 805. Downstream of the confluence of these two channels,
Newfields Ditch passes near the Building 119 parking lot and eventually enters another
underground culvert. Flow in Newfields Ditch then emerges northeast of Portsmouth
Avenue, where it flows through a wooded area, then enters another underground storm
*
sewer system. After emerging from that sewer system east of Concord Avenue, the stream
borders a former residential section of the base. As the stream passes the former residential
area, the channel is narrow, with steep embankments. Curving south, Newfields Ditch joins
Hodgsons Brook near the recreational baseball fields, flows through a wet meadow area,
and eventually leaves the base, passing under Spaulding Turnpike.
D. Zone Source Area General Characteristics
Figure 6 shows the location and probable extent of IRP-related and UST Program source
areas identified in Zone 3. The UST Program source areas located in Zone 3 will not be
addressed in this ROD. Additionally, the Site 32/36 source areas are addressed in the Site
32/36 ROD and only the dissolved-phase groundwater plume emanating from these areas
is addressed in this document.
Of the IRP-related identified source areas in Zone 3 (excluding Sites 32 and 36, which are
addressed in a separate ROD), only 39b appears to have an associated groundwater plume
where dissolved contaminants have migrated away from the general area of the source.
Contamination in source area soil and groundwater and relatively limited groundwater
contaminant plumes were observed at five IRP Sites (excluding Sites 32 and 36, which are
addressed in a separate ROD) (31, 33,35b, 38a, and 39a).
Three identified source areas (excluding Sites 32 and 36, which are addressed in a separate
ROD) do not appear to be significant contaminant sources for various reasons:
MK01\RPT:00628026.0M\zoBe3ioiLa 32 09/12/95
-------
LEGEND
Potential source area
Potential area ol sod/sediment
contamination
39a Potential source area listed
11 In TaWe 2 ol Appendii A
Roads/rurnvaysjasphalt/concrata)
: = = Unpaved roads and trails
rfl Buildings
-*~«~ Fence
Surface water drainage
f* * / Marshy area
o Uap Souic*
Dated */•• of pnotogfunnwbic ajmpd«ton of
PAFB from Mntf photography datad 11/23/87
Zone 3
Stage 4, Record of Decision
Pease Air Fora* Base, New Hampshire
FIGURE 6
POTENTIAL SOURCE AREA MAP
-------
• The former HMSA at Site 35 (source 35a) was located on an asphalt driveway
in an area where surface spills would not likely migrate to the site soils and
groundwater. No contamination associated with the former HMSA was
detected at the site.
• The storm sewer line (source ISa) between Building 227 and the Haven well
and the 6-inch industrial wastewater line from Building 227 to the former
Building 226 oil/water separator were investigated to determine whether they
were contaminant sources. Based on the results of the storm sewer
investigation and tightness testing of the 6-inch industrial wastewater line
southeast of the building, the two sewer lines do not appear to represent
current contaminant SOUTCCS.
• Potential contaminant sources at Site 42 (source 42) including the fuel UST,
oil/water separator, and the incinerator ash storage area were investigated by
ICF-KE between November 1991 and May 1992. The results of the site
investigation (G-310) sampling analyses showed only low levels of total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) in the subsurface soils and no VOC or PAH
compounds were detected. Groundwater contamination detected at Site 42
is attributed to plumes originating from UST Sites 72 and 81, so there appears
to be no source area contamination at Site 42.
Light, non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) was observed at the water table at only one of
the Zone 3 IRP source areas. At Site 35, the LNAPL was detected in only one well or
piezometer, suggesting the extent of LNAPL of in the subsurface is limited. No LNAPL was
detected in nearby soil borings and wells.
Soil contaminant source areas evaluated in the Zone 3 Draft Final FS include the UST that
was removed from Site 31 (Building 244); the oil/water separator removed from Site 33
(Building 229); the UST and oil/water separator that were removed from Site 35 (Building
226); the HMSA and a possible surface spill at Site 38 (Building 120); several sources at Site
39 associated with the waste storage and wash rack areas; and the floor drains, sumps, and
drainage lines*under Building 227. These sources were characterized through a combination
of surface soil, soil boring, and test pit samples. Chemical analyses of soil samples revealed
the presence of the following contaminant groups at the aforementioned sites:
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3nxltt 35 09/15/95
-------
Aromatic hydrocarbons (AHCs).
Halogenated hydrocarbons (HHCs).
Oxygenated hydrocarbons (OHCs).
PAHs.
Phthalates (PHTs).
Oxygenated semivolatiles (OSVs).
Nitrogenated semivolatiles.
TPHs.
Polychlorinated biphenyls.
PCBs.
Metals.
Site 31 (Building 244)
The soil contaminants at Site 31 are predominantly organic compounds of the following
three groups: AHCs, aliphatic HHCs, and PAHs. AHCs detected include the fuel-related
contaminants benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes. AHC contamination
concentrations in soil at ground surface to 10 feet BGS were low. Most of the
contamination found at Site 31 is in the immediate vicinity of the former waste solvent UST,
which was considered the source of contamination at Site 31. The extent of contamination
at Site 31 was evaluated based on surface soil, soil boring, and test pit samples. Site 31
maximum detected concentrations for both organics and inorganics are presented in Table
2.
Site 33 (Building 229)
The extent and nature of the organic contamination at Site 33 was based on the collection
and analysis of 7 surface soil samples and 85 soil boring samples. The primary organic
contaminants detected~at Site 33 were AHCs, PAHs, PCBs (Aroclor-1254), and PHTs. Most
of the organic contamination is thought to be fuel-related and most was located near the
oil/water separator on-site.
A total of 8 surface soil samples and 59 soil boring samples were analyzed for total metals.
Concentrations for 17 of the metals analyzed exceeded the basewide background values, and
included antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper,
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
magnesium, mercury, nickel, potassium, silicon, sodium, thallium, vanadium, and zinc. Site
33 maximum detected concentrations are presented in Table 3.
Site 35 (Building 226)
The nature and extent of soil contamination at Site 35, resulting from historic use of the
solvent UST and the oil/water separator, both removed in 1991, were evaluated on the
analysis of 5 surface samples and 57 soil boring samples. The primary organic
contamination detected in the site soils includes AHCs, HHCs, PAHs, and PHTs. All the
detected contamination at the site was collected near the former solvent UST. Free-phase
product, identified as PD-680, was detected between the former solvent UST and Building
226.
The extent of metals-contaminated soil also was determined based on 5 surface soil samples
and 28 soil boring samples. Concentrations of 14 metals exceeded background values,
including antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, magnesium, manganese,
mercury, molybdenum, nickel, sodium, thallium, and vanadium. Maximum detected
concentrations for Site 35 soils are presented in Table 4.
Site 38 (Building 120)
The primary source of soil contamination at Site 38 was the HMSA near the southeastern
corner of Building 120. However, an area of PAH contamination was detected in the
surface soil along the northeast side of the building as well. A total of 35 soil boring
samples were collected and analyzed to evaluate the nature and extent of organic soil
contamination at Site 38. The primary organic contamination at Site 38 includes HHCs,
PAHs, PHTs, and AHCs. PAHs were the only contaminants found in high concentrations
at the northeastern corner of Building 120. The source of the PAHs is unknown.
A total of 34 soil boring samples from Site 38 were analyzed for total metals. A total of 14
metals exceeded base background values: aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, calcium, chromium,
i
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 37 09/15/95
-------
iron, magnesium, manganese, mercury, nickel, potassium, sodium, thallium, and vanadium.
Table 5 presents the maximum detected concentrations for Site 38 soil.
Site 39 (Building 227)
Two principal areas of contamination were identified at Site 39; the soil beneath the former
wash rack and the HMSAs in Building 227, and the soil beneath and immediately outside
the southwestern corner of the building. Soil contamination at both of the areas consists
of AHCs/HHCs, PAHs, and TPHs. PAHs also were detected beneath and at the edge of
the paved areas at the site. The PAHs are thought to be ubiquitous in surface soils along
the flightline because of the high vehicular and aircraft activity. HHCs and AHCs were
detected primarily at depths 14 to 30 feet in soils at the southwestern corner of the building.
HHCs and PAHs were also detected under the former wash rack area.
A total of 101 soil boring samples were collected and analyzed for metals. Concentrations
for 18 of the metals exceed base background values, consisting of antimony, arsenic, barium,
boron, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, manganese, mercury,
molybdenum, nickel, sodium, thallium, vanadium, and zinc. Both organic and inorganic
maximum detected soil concentrations for Site 39 are presented in Table 6.
E. Zone Groundwater Characteristics
For ease of presentation in evaluating and describing the distribution of contaminants in
groundwater at Zone 3, the zone was divided into three sectors, each containing one or
more of the sites previously identified. The sectors were further divided by
hydrostratigraphic units into four layers: water table, LS/GT, shallow bedrock, and deep
bedrock. The groundwater sampling locations at each site were assigned to one of the four
layers, depending on the geologic unit(s) in which the well or piezometer was screened and
the specific hydrogeologic conditions at each sampling location.
The groundwater analytical data were divided into the following analytical categories:
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodja 38 09/15/95
-------
AHCs.
HHCs.
PAHs.
PHTs.
Phenols (PHEs).
Metals.
The organic analytes were classified into chemical groups based on the physical properties
of the contaminant A hit in the metals category was considered to be any value above the
maximum basewide background concentration for that metal.
Both filtered and unfiltered groundwater samples were collected to characterize potential
metals contamination of Zone 3 groundwater. All of these samples were collected in
accordance with groundwater sampling protocols as presented in the approved Work Plans,
QAPP, and SAPs (G-534; G-535; G-563; G-564; G-565; and G-596), and during some
sampling events, the actions were observed in the field by EPA and NHDES oversight
personnel.
Sites 32 and 36
Sites 32 and 36 were combined to simplify the plume descriptions because of the similarity
of contaminants in groundwater at the two source areas, and because the plumes coalesce
as they move downgradient. The source areas at Sites 32 and 36 are addressed in the Site
32/36 ROD, but are briefly discussed herein to present background information on the
dissolved-phase plume emanating from the source areas and located outside of the physical
and hydraulic containment system at Site 32. The primary known sources are a former
waste TCE tank and associated overflow pipe at the northern corner of Building 113, a
former drum storage area (HMSA) and wash rack at the edge of the southern parking area
of Building 119, and an area of possible past waste solvent discharge and stressed
vegetation at the northeastern edge of Building 119. A potential source area identified in
the unsaturated overburden at soil boring 7092 does not appear to affect the groundwater.
Source area and groundwater contaminants at Site 32/36 primarily consist of HHCs,
specifically TCE and its associated degradation compounds 1,2-dichloroethene (DCE) and
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rodja 39 09/15/95
-------
vinyl chloride. A relatively minor occurrence of AHCs was observed in Site 32/36
groundwater, mostly at the Building 119 drum storage/wash rack source area. A summary
of the highest concentrations of organic compounds detected in the Site 32/36 groundwater
is presented in Table 7.
The extent of HHC and AHC groundwater contamination in the US at the water table is
relatively limited to the general vicinity of the source areas. There has been little horizontal
migration because the saturated thickness of the US is minimal and the source areas are in
recharge areas where the predominant flow direction is downward.
The HHC groundwater contamination in the LS is highest directly under the source areas
where residual DNAPL is potentially present. The HHC groundwater plume in the LS
extends approximately 1,200 feet downgradient and crosses under Portsmouth Avenue. The
extent of the HHC plume in the LS groundwater is less than the extent of the plume hi the
shallow bedrock.
In the shallow bedrock, the HHC plume extends to the east across Portsmouth Avenue
under Newfields Ditch. The farthest downgradient migration of VOCs [above maximum
contaminant levels (MCLs)] has been in the shallow bedrock. The high concentrations of
HHCs in the shallow bedrock at the source areas .suggest that DNAPL has moved downward
into bedrock at Site 32/36. AHCs were detected at low levels in source area monitor wells
6013 and 6073.
The number of sampling points in deep bedrock in the Site 32/36 area is significantly
smaller than the number for the overlying units. Sampling of the existing points indicated
an overall pattern in the deep bedrock similar to that in the shallow bedrock. The general
shape of the plume contours has been projected downward from the overlying shallow
bedrock layer. The data from well 616 suggest that the relatively high concentrations
detected in the center of the plume in the overburden and shallow bedrock decrease with
depth in the deep bedrock water-bearing unit.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3iod.sa 40 09/15/95
-------
Sites 34 and 39
The primary source areas for Site 34 are the USTs associated with the Jet Engine Test Cell.
Two source areas were identified at Site 39; one at the northern and a second at the
southern corner of Building 227. A summary of the highest concentrations of organic
compounds detected in groundwater for Sites 34 and 39 is presented in Appendix A
In the water table unit, a groundwater divide bisects Building 227 with groundwater flowing
both southward and eastward from under the building. At the divide, shallow groundwater
flows east from the northeastern end of the building and south from the southwestern end.
These flow directions are reflected in the shape of the HHC plumes. AHCs were detected
in the water table beneath the source at the northern corner of the building.
The total HHC contour map for the LS shows an expanded contaminant plume relative to
the water table. The expansion is caused, in part, by a change in groundwater flow direction
with depth at the water table to southeast in the LS.
AHCs and HHCs in the LS appear to be migrating southward from the southern end of the
building. The plume appears to be preferentially flowing to the south near Site 34 within
a channel of permeable sand and gravel in the LS. Because of the groundwater divide,
HHC groundwater contamination also extends eastward in the LS from the Site 39 source
areas.
»
In the bedrock, HHC plume migration is to the southeast The plume is influenced by the
Site 34 groundwater recovery wells that are completed in the deep bedrock. The HHC
concentration contours for deep bedrock at Sites 34 and 39 are based on a limited number
of data points.
HHCs were detected in monitor wells located on the aircraft parking apron that were
completed in the water table. The HHCs are believed to be associated with the sources
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod,s» 41 09/15/95
-------
responsible for the Site 39 plume. The two lobes associated with the plume are believed
to be attributable to the presence of a bedrock high centered at Building 222.
AHCs detected at Site 34 in the LS appear to originate at the source USTs near Building
222, and at a source associated with the aircraft refueling hydrant system located beneath
the aircraft parking apron. The delineated plumes indicate a groundwater flow direction
from the source areas toward the Site 34 recovery wells and/or Newfields Ditch.
The recovery wells at Site 34 draw the HHC plume from Site 39 into Site 34. The southern
end of the HHC plume in the shallow bedrock appears to be drawn eastward toward
groundwater recovery wells 634 and 635 at Site 34.
The source of AHCs at Site 34 is a former UST installed within the bedrock. AHCs in the
bedrock are concentrated at the source at well 6041, and the delineated extent of
downgradient migration is approximately 600 feet.
Sites 33, 35, and 38
Sites 33, 35, and 38 are combined in this discussion because of their similarity and proximity
to each other. The various groundwater contaminant plumes for Sites 33, 35, and 38 all
appear to converge and coalesce in the LS unit, forming a composite groundwater plume.
Samples from wells monitoring the water table contained HHCs at Sites 35 and 38, but not
at Site 33. The sources were as follows:
Site 33 — Drains and nonpoint sources.
Site 35 — A former UST and an oil/water separator.
Site 38 - A former HMSA.
Site 35 also contains a water table well that encountered free-phase product. The product
was identified as paint thinner or PD-680.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod^a 42 09/15/95
-------
A low-level HHC has been delineated in the LS, encompassing all three sites. The plume
extends eastward from Site 33, following the groundwater flow gradient, with areas of higher
HHC concentrations below the three identified source areas.
AHC plumes were detected in the US water table unit at Sites 33 and 35. The two plumes
are not extensive and are predominantly located in the Site 33 and 35 source areas.
F. Groundwater Conceptual Model
This subsection presents the working conceptual model for Zone 3 sites. Because the zone
contains a relatively large number of sites, the conceptual model discussion centers on the
major groundwater contaminant plumes identified during the investigations. Figure 7
presents Zone 3 with the composite (all hydrostratigraphic units combined) groundwater
contaminant plumes delineated, along with the conceptual model cross-section lines. Table
9 presents a summary of the conceptual model data for each of the Zone 3 ERF sites.
Sites 32 and 36
TCE released from the waste solvent UST and overflow pipe at Site 32 would have likely
migrated downward through the US as a DNAPL to the water table and farther downward
to the MCS, LS, and top of bedrock. Based on the analytical results from samples collected
from bedrock wells in the source area, DNAPL has reached the shallow bedrock at Site 32.
*
The model of DNAPL movement at Site 32 suggests that waste solvent remains within the
MCS below the area where DNAPL spread laterally, in the LS as fingers of residual
DNAPL, and in the bedrock fractures. At Sites 32 and 36, the shallow bedrock is the most
transmissive water-bearing zone and the downgradient plume extent (approximately 1,500
feet) is greatest within the shallow bedrock, as would be expected. Figure 8 shows the
conceptual illustration of the Site 32 groundwater plume.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rcxLM 43 09/15/95
-------
Flightline Area - Sites 34 and 39
The central portion of the Pease AFB flightline area contains the Haven well, sections of
the aircraft fuel distribution system (including pump houses, USTs, and underground
hydrants/piping), the main storm sewer system lines draining the flightline, two IRP Sites
(Sites 34 and 39), recovery wells at Site 34 associated with the IRM discussed in Section n,
and the extensive concrete aircraft parking apron. Many of these features or i tivities
related to these features are interrelated in terms of environmental impact.
A limited AHC groundwater contaminant plume associated with fuel releases from USTs
and JETC efflu t discharges has been delineated at Site 34. Because Site 34 is in a
recharge area where groundwater movement is downward and the depth to bedrock is
minimal (some of the USTs were set into bedrock), the AHC contaminant plume is
primarily contained within the bedrock.
At Site 39, there is _:i HHC groundwater contaminant plume originating from the suspected
source area identified at the southeast corner of Building 227. The plume has three lobes
(see Figure 7); one extending to the south under the aircraft parking apron near Site 34, one
to the east-southeast in the Site 34 wetland area, and one extending westward to the Haven
well. The first two lobes appear to follow the natural groundwater flow directions at Site
39 where groundwater flow diverges along a groundwater divide. The lobe extending toward
the Haven well may be the result of pumping at the Haven well. Figure 9 illustrates the
conceptual model for the Site 39 groundwater contaminant plume. As with Site 32, there
appears to have been a DNAPL release at the southeastern corner of Building 227. The
mass of solvent released appears to be considerably less, but the distribution seems to follow
the model presented for Site 32.
The surface runoff, groundwater recharge, and groundwater flow in the flightline area has
been altered by the construction of the aircraft parking apron, the storm sewer system, and
the pumping of both the Haven well and the Site 34 bedrock groundwater recovery wells.
Pumping of both the Haven well and the Site 34 recovery wells has influenced the direction
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 44 09/15/95
-------
En*m ol AHC graundwaMr pknM
I ^ Extort d HHC graundmMr pkjnw
AA AA' Conc«ptMl rmM cms wcton
D»»nMI«J «it*nt riDnMnU • CttnpoM* ol dWKMd
in (A
•Ml bo»i AHC and HHC oooummwwi M
pradomlnani dni
-^T-V-V ? • ;'\; ,"•
.> : - - „ • s V 'i_. _i_ I
Alrcran Parking Apron
Don* I
9M0t 4. HMord of OKWM
Air Fore*
FIGURE 7
COMPOSITE QROUNDWATER PLUME AND
CONCEPTUAL MODEL CROSS SECTION MAP
-------
LEGEND
I | Upper Sand Unit
I I Marine Clay and
Silt Unit
] Lower Sand Unit
I I Bedrock Unit
_V_ Measured Water
Table Elevation.
Dashed where
Approximate
Well Number
FloAwUne
Total HHCs in Groundwalei (ug/L)
ZoM3
Stags 4. Record ol Decision
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
RGUREB
STTH 32/38 CONCEPTUAL MODEL
-------
BB
(NNW)
(SSE)
I Upper Sand Unit
I _ I Marine Clay
and
SMUiM
I I Lower Sand Unit
I I Bedrock Un*
I iGlaoalTa
_T_ Measured Water TaMe Elevation.
Dashed where Approximate
WeN Nurnber
Total Halogenated Hydrocarbon
Concentration in Groundwater (ug/L)
Flow Line
Vertical
exaggeration
to>
1 10,"
* ••• I
0 IOO
Zo«e3
Stage 4. ReoonJ of Dec Won
Peaae Air Force taee. New HumpMn
PVQUHE9
SHE 39 OONC011ML MOOB.
LLU5TIU110N
-------
of groundwater flow under the aircraft parking apron and apparently has pulled dissolved
phase contamination from the Site 39 HHC plume toward the Haven well and Site 34. The
design of the storm sewer pipeline joints allows both the discharge of storm sewer water to
groundwater (where the pipeline is above the water table) and the inflow of groundwater
into the storm sewers (where the pipeline is below the water table). This would allow
contaminants in the groundwater plumes to enter into the storm sewer and be discharged
into Mclntyre Brook and contaminants in the storm sewer to leak out near the Haven well
where the water table was depressed during periods of high-volume pumping.
The relationships of the Haven well, the Building 227 floor drains, and the groundwater
contaminants beneath the aircraft parking apron in the US to the storm sewer system are
important. Prior to their being sealed in 1991, the Building 227 floor drains served as a
potential collection point for waste solvents used for aircraft maintenance inside Building
227. These floor drains connected directly into the storm sewer pipeline that passes within
75 feet of the Haven well; this conduit probably served as the migration pathway for the
TCE contamination that was detected in the Haven well during 1977. This conceptual
model for the Haven well/storm sewer system relationship is illustrated in Figure 10.
G. Zone Surface Water/Sediment Sources
This subsection identifies potential sources of the organic and inorganic compounds detected
in the surface water and sediment of Upper Newfields Ditch and Upper Grafton Ditch.
Tables 10 through 13 present a summary of the highest concentrations of organic compounds
and metals detected in the surface water and sediment samples collected from Upper
Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches. Potential sources of the detected organic and
inorganic compounds include:
• Pesticide spraying in the wetland areas.
• Groundwater baseflow into the surface water drainages.
• Runoff from storms.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rcxJia 51 09/15/95
-------
Leaching of compounds from sediment into surface water.
Aerial fallout of combustion products from aircraft engines and local heating
and industrial operations.
"roundwater table elevations during August 1991 and January 1993 in the area of Sites 34
and 32/36, as well as field observations, indicate that Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton
Ditches are gaining streams during part of the year.
A comparison of the plume maps for HHCs in the water table aquifer for the southern
sector of Zone 3 with the results of sediment and surface water sample analyses indicates
a probable groundwater source for the HHCs observed in some surface water and sediment
samples.
Several plumes in the area of the ditches exist, including a shallow HHC plume upgradient
of Upper Newfields Ditch and two separate shallow HHC plumes adjacent to Newfields
Ditch in the area of Site 32/36. The plume upgradient of the head of Newfields Ditch is
the likely source of the trace concentrations of TCE and ICE breakdown products detected
in surface water and sediment in Upper Newfields Ditch. The relatively high concentrations
at the most upstream sampling points in Newfields Ditch (8045 and 8066) support this
conclusion. Concentrations of HHCs decrease downstream from the head of the ditch,
probably because of natural attenuation processes. Similar decreases in TCE concentrations
in surface water are observed downstream of the Site 32/36 plumes. Figure 11 presents the
distribution of organic surface water contamination in Upper Grafton and Upper Newfields
Ditches.
To determine -whether groundwater was contributing metals to surface water, the
concentrations of soluble metals in four water table monitor wells adjacent to Upper
Newfields Ditch were compared to concentrations in surface water from the ditch. None
of the wells exhibit metals concentrations exceeding background concentrations for
groundwater. Of all the metals detected in the local groundwater, none exceeded
concentrations detected in the surface water. This' comparison indicates that the
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonc3ro
-------
f
Legend
r~1 S0ww Pip» Etolow
| __ ] Groundwatw Tabto
f
Leaking
Wastowater
Flow Direction
r Groundwatvr
Tabto
: llMtf«on r«pf»wnis condiiorn D"O' to ifl74 «vh*x> wwTiwnt)
flow *»M routM to I1»> boiWmg 226 ori-w«»*>i i«pw>IOi
Zone 3
Stage 4, Record ot Decision
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
FIGURE 10
HAVEN WELL CONCEPTUAL MODEL
ILLUSTRATION
-------
AIRCRAFT PARKMO. AERO*
COCE-eto-t^OlcNafQ«rHm iaXL -1.2-Xytam
TOCC-nm-i^DicMararatMiw «M»-M«eiy»m
— -Bramafonn
TOE - TrichtoreMwm
AUB 4 ilaii ^iriannl
BW* • cMMy^nonDi
CHSZ • CNorobtnunt
VCL -VhytcHorid*
nw --
XL -Xyfcnt
4MP - 4-mMhyl plwnol
Benzm
•ui *»*--—'
rTIk • rnflmf
TOt -TokJMW
30 100
200
SCALE IN FEET
Bas* Mip Sourot:
Detail VM of phoMgrwnmMric oompilrton of
PAFB from Mriti photography dil»d 11/23/87.
.JS^ti
^V
3SX
ZOM3
ire
FIGURE 11
SURFACE WATER ORGANICS • UPPER
NEWFIELDS AND UPPER GRAFTON DITCHES
55
-------
concentrations of inorganics found in the Newfields Ditch surface water are not solely the
result of metals contributed by groundwater baseflow.
Runoff does not appear to be an important contaminant source for Upper Newfields and
Upper Grafton Ditches based on the limited area that drains into the ditches. Because of
the westward slope of the aircraft parking apron toward the storm sewer system, no runoff
from the apron reaches the ditches.
In addition to the contribution of metals and PAHs that may come from Site 34 (JETC) to
Upper Grafton Ditch, a potential source of the PAHs and some of the metals detected in
the surface sediments is aerial fallout of fuel combustion byproducts. Trace metals such as
vanadium tend to accumulate in the clay-rich soils and organic matter found in wetlands (G-
762).
To evaluate the leachability of contaminants from sediment, two samples were collected
from Upper Newfields Ditch for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)
leachability analysis. These two samples represent two of the most contaminated sediment
sampling locations in Upper Newfields Ditch.
The two samples were analyzed for leachability of VOCs, semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOCs), herbicides/pesticides, PCBs, and metals. The TCLP analyses of samples from
locations 19-8045 and 19-8064 detected only one metal (barium) at concentrations of 1.2 and
0.8 mg/L, respectively. One VOC (chloroform) was reported for sample 19-8045. Because
no chloroform was detected hi the original sediment analysis, this TCLP VOC analysis result
probably represents laboratory contamination. No SVOCs, herbicides/pesticides, or PCBs
were detected in the leachability testing.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\rone3uxJ^a 56 09/15/95
-------
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS
A baseline risk assessment was performed for the various sites and media in Zone 3, and
is presented in Section 6 of the Zone 3 Draft Final RI Report (G-629). The risk assessment
was performed to evaluate the potential health risks posed to human and ecological
receptors by exposure to zone-related contaminants. The risk assessment is intended to
provide information that can be used to determine the need for remedial action in Zone 3.
The risk assessment was performed for all media associated with the IRP sites in Zone 3,
with the exception of soil at Sites 32/36 and 34. The baseline risk assessments for Sites
32/36 and 34 soil are presented in the Site 32/36 Draft Final RI Report (G-583) and the
Site 34 Draft Final RI Report (G-579), respectively. In addition, human health and
ecological risk assessments for surface water and sediment in Mclntyre Brook and Lower
Newfields Ditch will be presented in the RI/FS Report prepared for these surface water
bodies.
The approach and methodology for preparing the risk assessment were originally presented
in a protocols document submitted to EPA New England and NHDES (G-568). This
document was subsequently amended based on a meeting among WESTON, the Air Force,
EPA New England, and NHDES (G-217), and a revised version was submitted (G-601).
The baseline risk assessment is divided into three main subsections:
• Data Evaluation and Reduction.
• Human Health Risk Assessment.
• Ecological Risk Assessment.
These subsections are presented in the RI Report and are described briefly in the
subsections that follow.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxJj« 57 09/15/95
-------
A. Data Evaluation and Reduction
The objectives of the data evaluation and reduction are to review and summarize the
analytical data for each medium and to select the chemicals of concern to be evaluated in
the risk assessment. The reviewed data include sampling results for soil, groundwater,
surface water, and sediment collected during Stages 2, 3, and 4 of the IRP, and the ETC
data. The chemicals analyzed in each medium consist of SVOCs, pesticides/PCBs, VOCs,
and inorganics (metals).
A preliminary data summary was performed on all media data sets. The guidelines followed
in preparation of the data summary are explained in detail in Subsection 6.2.1 of the Zone
3 Draft Final RI Report (G-629).
Based on the preliminary data summary, a maximum of approximately 25 to 30 chemicals
of concern were selected for each data set (G-217) using the following criteria. A chemical
was eliminated as a chemical of concern when:
• The chemical was detected in fewer than 5% of the samples and was not
reported at high concentrations based on professional judgment (G-189; G-
217).
• The chemical was not detected at a concentration above background
concentrations. Only inorganic chemicals were eliminated as chemicals of
concern based on a comparison with background. Although no organic
chemicals were eliminated based on a background comparison, those organics
that were not reported at concentrations above background are identified in
the relevant Section 6 and Appendix K tables of the Zone 3 Draft Final RI
Report (G-629).
Final summary tables were prepared for the chemicals of concern in each data set. Unless
otherwise indicated, the final summary tables contain the following information for each
chemical: frequency of detection, range of sample quantitation limits, range of averaged and
detected concentrations, mean concentration (based on the averaged values), and upper
95% confidence limit of the mean concentration. These summary tables are presented in
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
Section 6 of the Zone 3 Draft Final RI Report (G-629). Table 14 presents a summary of
chemicals of concern by medium for all media considered.
B. Human Health Risk Assessment
The objective of the exposure assessment is to develop exposure scenarios for each of the
applicable media and to calculate exposure doses to potential receptors. A most reasonable
maximally exposed individual (RME) was selected for each medium based on both current
and future land and water uses. The current use for Zone 3 is industrial. Many of the
buildings and industrial shops within the zone are not in use, but several are used at least
intermittently. It was assumed that the Zone 3 sites, which are currently or have previously
been used for industrial purposes, will have an industrial use in the future. With the
exception of the Haven well, groundwater is currently not used in Zone 3, but could
potentially be used for drinking or other purposes in the future. The current and future
RMEs that were selected for each medium are presented in Table 15.
A brief discussion of evaluated exposure pathways follows. A more thorough description
is presented in the risk assessment (Subsection 6.3.1 of the Zone 3 Draft Final RI Report)
(G-629). The current use exposure pathways evaluated are summarized below:
• Soil — A maintenance worker was selected as the current RME for each site
being evaluated through the soil pathway. Exposure was assumed to occur via
incidental ingestion and dermal contact, and frequency of exposure varied
depending on the site. For Site 31, a current maintenance worker was
assumed to be exposed for 50 days/year; for Sites 33, 35, and 38, 12
days/year; and for Site 39, 100 days/year.
• Groundwater — A current on-base maintenance worker was selected as the
RME for the groundwater pathway associated with the Haven well and
exposure duration was assumed to be 250 days/year. Because groundwater
use within Zone 3 is limited to the Haven well, a current RME was not
selected for groundwater elsewhere within the zone.
• Surface Water and Sediment — A maintenance worker was selected as the
current RME. For surface water, dermal contact was assumed, and for
sediment, incidental ingestion and dermal contact were assumed. Exposure
was limited to 12 days/year.
MK01\RPT:00628026.0M\zone3rod.*i 59 09/15/95
-------
Future use scenarios were as follows:
• Soil — Future receptors for Sites 31, 33, 35, 38, and 39 were assumed to be
maintenance workers. Exposure frequency of the maintenance worker at Sites
31 and 39 were the same as the current worker. A future exposure frequency
of 50 days/year was assumed for Sites 33 and 38. A future exposure
frequency of 12 days/year was assumed for Site 35.
• Groundwater — An off-base resident was selected as the future RME for the
groundwater pathway for each of the evaluated groundwater data sets. The
off-base resident is considered to be exposed for 350 days/year for 30 years.
• Surface Water and Sediment — A maintenance worker was selected as the
future RME for surface water and sediment pathways associated with Upper
Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches. Contact was assumed to continue to
be minimal. An exposure frequency of 1 hour/day, 12 days/year was assumed
for each water body.
For each pathway evaluated, average and reasonable maximum exposure estimates were
generated corresponding to exposure to the average and maximum concentrations detected
in that particular medium.
Excess cancer risks were determined for each exposure pathway by multiplying the exposure
level by the chemical-specific cancer factor. Cancer potency factors have been developed
by EPA from epidemiological or animal studies to reflect a conservative upper bound of the
risk posed by potentially carcinogenic compounds (i.e., the actual risk is unlikely to be
greater than the risk predicted). The resulting risk estimates arfe expressed .exponentially
(e.g., 1 x 10"6 for 1/1,000,000) and indicate (using this example) that an average individual
is likely to have 1-in-l-million chance of developing cancer over 70 years as a result of site-
related exposure as defined for the compound at the stated concentration. Current EPA
practice considers cancer risk to be additive when assessing exposure to a mixture of
hazardous substances.
A hazard index was also calculated for each pathway as EPA's measure of the potential for
noncancer health effects. A hazard quotient is calculated by dividing the exposure level by
the reference dose (RfD) or other suitable benchmark for noncancer health effects for an
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod^a 60 09/15/95
-------
individual compound. Reference doses have been developed by EPA to protect sensitive
individuals over the course of a lifetime, and they reflect a daily exposure level that is likely
to be without an appreciable risk of an adverse health effect. RfDs are derived from
epidemiological or animal studies and incorporate uncertainty factors to help ensure that
adverse health effects will not occur. The hazard quotient is often expressed as a single
value (e.g., 03) indicating the ratio of the stated exposure as defined to the reference dose
value (in this example, the exposure as characterized is approximately one-third of an
acceptable exposure level for the given compound). A hazard quotient is only considered
additive for compounds that have the same or similar toxic endpoint, and the sum is
referred to as the hazard index. For example, the hazard quotient for a compound known
to produce liver damage should not be added to a second whose toxic endpoint is kidney
damage.
The total lifetime cancer risks and total hazard indices are presented by medium in Table
16. Where applicable, the cancer risks and hazard indices were calculated using three
concentrations: the mean, the upper 95% confidence limit of the mean, and the maximum.
Two subsets of total cancer risks and total hazard indices were calculated for soil, sediment,
and surface water. One subset was based on all of the chemicals of concern, and the other
was based on inorganic chemicals and organic chemicals of concern that were detected
above background. Two sets are also presented for the groundwater data sets that include
only bedrock groundwater: one based on organics and filtered inorganics, and the other
based on organics and total inorganics. Risks for the overburden groundwater were
calculated based on organics and inorganics data from filtered samples only.
*
The cancer risks posed to the RME for the soil pathway for Sites 31,33,35,38, and 39 were
less than 10"5 for all exposure concentrations, but greater than 10"6 at Sites 31, 33, 38, and
39. Although potential risks, based on all chemicals of concern and chemicals of concern
detected above background, exceeded the lower limit of the EPA range of generally
acceptable risk levels (1(T* to 10*) at Sites 31, 33, 38, and 39, the Air Force believes that
these risk levels do not require action. EPA typically requires action for cancer risk levels
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodJU 61 09/15/95
-------
greater than 10"4. In addition, there are no significant noncancer health risks (all hazard
indices were less than 1) associated with exposure to soil at any of the sites evaluated.
Several of the groundwater data subsets posed potential cancer and noncancer risks above
those usually considered acceptable by regulatory agencies (i.e., cancer risks were greater
than 10"4 and hazard indices were greater than 1). These subsets were:
• Site 32/36 Overburden and Shallow Bedrock - Main.
• Site 33 — Upper Sand.
• Site 34 Bedrock — Hot Spot.
• Sites 35/38/39 Overburden and Shallow Bedrock and Site 34 Overburden —
Main and Hot Spots I and II.
The cancer risks for the other groundwater subsets were between 10"6 and 10"4. The total
hazard indices were also at or below the criterion of concern of 1.
The cancer risks posed by exposure to sediment and surface water in Upper Newfields and
Upper Grafton Ditches were approximately at or below 10^ for all exposure scenarios.
Total hazard indices for all sediment and surface water exposure scenarios were less than 1.
Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from this zone, if not addressed by
implementing the response action selected in this ROD, may present an imminent and
substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment.
C. Ecological Risk Assessment
The ecological risk assessment evaluated the potential adverse impacts of the chemicals of
concern detected hi surface soil, surface water, and sediment on terrestrial organisms
inhabiting Sites 33 (surface soil), 34 (wetlands sediment), and 39 (surface soil), and aquatic
life living in Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches (surface water and sediment).
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3todsa 62 09/15/95
-------
Receptors were chosen to adequately represent components of the local ecosystems that
appear most susceptible to Zone 3 contamination.
The species evaluated and their relevant exposure pathways are as follows:
Short-Tailed Shrew
• Ingestion of soil invertebrates (i.e., earthworms).
• Incidental ingestion of soil.
American Robin
• Ingestion of soil invertebrates (i.e., earthworms).
• Incidental ingestion of soil. ~~
• Ingestion of surface water.
Aquatic Biota
• Direct contact with surface water.
• Direct contact with sediments.
The potential risk posed to the short-tailed shrew and American robin were assessed by
comparing estimated daily doses of the chemical of concern (average and maximum
concentrations) or medium-specific concentrations to critical toxicity values (CTVs) (i.e.,
acceptable daily intakes) derived for each species. Potential risks to aquatic lift inhabiting
the surface waters of Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches were assessed by
comparing average and maximum surface water concentrations for chemicals of concern with
NHDES Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) or aquatic toxicity data when AWQC
were not available. Potential risks to aquatic benthic and epibenthic life inhabiting the
sediment of Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches were assessed by comparing mean
and maximum sediment or interstitial water concentrations for chemicals of concern with
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) biological effect levels or
freshwater toxicity values and AWQC.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxJja 63 09/15/95
-------
Hazard quotients were calculated for each contaminant by dividing the estimated daily
intake by the CTV or the average and maximum concentrations by the chosen criteria.
Hazard quotients were summed across all exposure pathways for each contaminant to
develop contaminant-specific hazard indices. Contaminant-specific hazard indices (average
and maximum concentrations) were then added to provide cumulative hazard indices for
target species. A hazard quotient or index greater than 1 indicates that the species may be
at risk to an adverse effect through exposure, but does not necessarily indicate that an
adverse effect will occur. A hazard index of less than 1 indicates that adverse effects are
not likely to occur and no action is required. A hazard index of greater than 10 indicates
that risks are at a level of potential concern and may warrant action. A hazard index
between 1 and 10 is subject to interpretation based on the toxicity of the chemical and the
uncertainty in the calculation. In addition, the frequency of detection and reproducibility
of the data should be investigated. Whether a remedial action must be initiated should be
examined on a site-by-site basis, after careful consideration of the levels of the hazard
indices compared to the possible adverse effects of remedial action on the ecological habitat
(e.g., loss of existing wetland communities and other habitats, or increased contaminant
migration resulting from resuspension of contaminated fine-grained particles).
The total hazard indices for all ecological receptors are presented in Tables 17 through 28.
The following paragraphs provide an overview of the findings of the ecological risk
assessment for Zone 3 and highlight contaminants that contributed substantially to the total
hazard for each receptor.
For the short-tailed shrew, the total average and maximum hazard indices were as follows:
• 1.86 x 102 and 3.99 x 102 for Site 33 (surface soil).
• 2.87 x 103 and 1.02 x 104 for Site 34 (wetlands sediment).
• 8.37 x 101 and 1.59 x 102 for Site 39 (surface soil).
Nearly all of the potential risk to shrews in Zone 3 is due to ingestion of earthworms. Zinc
(66% of the risk), iron (approximately 95%), and cadmium (approximately 66%) contributed
the majority of the total hazard indices calculated for Sites 33, 34, and 39, respectively.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodja 64 09/15/9S
-------
For the American robin, the total average and maximum hazard indices were as follows:
1.04 x 102 and 2.13 x 102 for Site 33 (surface soil).
2.93 x 101 and 1.06 x 102 for Site 34 (wetlands sediment).
1.14 x 102 and 2.52 x 102 for Site 39 (surface soil).
The potential risks to the American robin associated with the chemicals of concern are
primarily attributed to earthworm ingestion. Inorganic contaminants were the major
contributors to total average and maximum hazard indices. Zinc (approximately 83%),
arsenic (approximately 36%), and chromium (greater than 99%) contributed to the total
hazard indices at Sites 33, 34, and 39, respectively. At Site 34, pesticides (4,4'-DDT and
4,4'-DDE) also contributed substantially to risk, but elevated hazard indices were low in
frequency when compared to those pesticide concentrations which are considered
representative of normal basewide residual levels.
Potential risks to aquatic communities in Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches were
assessed by comparing surface water concentrations to AWQC, or to aquatic toxicity data
when AWQC were not available. In Upper Newfields Ditch, aluminum was the only
chemical to exceed acute average and maximum criteria, as shown in Table 23. All of the
acute criteria exceedances in Upper Newfields Ditch resulted from inorganics detected in
surface water. Criteria hazard indices in Upper Newfields Ditch exceeded 1 for both
average and maximum concentrations for 8 and 12 chemicals of concern, respectively (see
Table 23). Of these, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was the only organic compound exceeding
the criteria. The majority of the risk for chronic adverse effects is associated with inorganic
chemicals of concern.
In Upper Grafton Ditch, aluminum was the only chemical of concern to exceed the acute
water quality criteria. Chemicals of concern with concentrations exceeding chronic criteria
included bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and aluminum for both average and maximum hazard
quotients. The majority of the hazard quotients calculated were between 1 and 10 (see
Table 24).
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\2one3rod4a 65 09/15/95
-------
The potential impacts of sediment contamination on the benthic and epibenthic communities
in Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches were evaluated by comparing sediment
concentrations with NOAA-based biological effects range-low (ER-Ls) and biological effects
range-median (ER-Ms). In addition, the Equilibrium Partitioning (EqP) approach, a
method recognized by EPA as a measure of bioavailability, was used to assess the potential
impact of hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediment.
As shown in Table 25, hazard quotients for sediment in Upper Newfields Ditch exceeded
*
both ER-L and ER-M criteria. However, with the exception of hazard quotients calculated
for pesticides, the majority of the hazard quotients were less than 10. The results of the
EqP evaluation (Table 26) indicate that only two stations (831 and 805) had hazard
quotients greater than 1. At Station 831, pyrene had a hazard quotient of 1.54 and at
Station 805, the pesticide 4,4'-DDT exceeded 1, but as previously discussed, is not
considered to be the result of a site-specific release and is considered indicative of normal
basewide residual levels.
In Upper Grafton Ditch, the highest hazard quotients were attributed to 2-
methylnaphthalene (9.70 x 101) and naphthalene (1.81 x 101). The only station with hazard
quotients greater than 1 was Station 8077, which had hazard quotients of 3.33 x 101 and 3.46
x 10° for 2-methylnaphthalene and naphthalene, respectively. Tables 27 and 28 summarize
the sediment results for ecological risk assessment performed for Upper Grafton Ditch.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 66 09/15/95
-------
VII. DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES
A. Statutory Requirements/Response Objectives
Section 121 of CERCLA establishes several statutory requirements and preferences,
including: (1) remedial actions must be protective of human health and the environment;
(2) remedial actions, when complete, must comply with all federal and more stringent state
environmental standards, requirements, criteria, or limitations, unless a waiver is invoked;
(3) the remedial action selected must be cost effective and use permanent solutions and
alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum extent
practicable; and (4) a preference for remedies in which treatment that permanently and
significantly reduces the toxitity, mobility, or volume (TMV) of the hazardous substances
is a principal element over remedies not involving such-treatment. Response alternatives
were developed to be consistent with these mandates.
Based on preliminary information relating to the types of contaminants, environmental
media of concern, and potential exposure pathways, RAOs were developed to aid in the
development and screening of alternatives. These RAOs were developed to mitigate
existing and future potential threats to human health and the environment RAOs for Zone
3 are discussed in this subsection.
Site 31
The results of the risk assessment conducted during the Zone 3 RI (see Section VI)
indicated that there are no unacceptable human health risks above EPA's range of generally
acceptable levels (HT* to 10"6) associated with the exposure of current and future potential
receptors to soil at Site 31, or the groundwater beneath Site 31. In addition, the results of
the qualitative and quantitative evaluations conducted to assess the potential for
contaminants to leach to groundwater indicated that contaminants detected in soil do not
pose a leaching concern. An ecological risk assessment was not performed at Site 31
because the area is not considered a habitat conducive to ecological receptors.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3Kxl^» 67 09/15/95
-------
Although a low-level HHC groundwater plume was detected in the immediate vicinity of the
former UST at the site, contamination is limited and is expected to naturally attenuate to
acceptable levels within a reasonable time frame. For these reasons, Site 31 soil and
groundwater require no further action under CERCLA and consequently, RAOs were not
developed for this site. Groundwater quality at the site will be monitored as part of the
Zone 3 long-term monitoring plan.
The results of the human health risk assessment indicated that no unacceptable current or
potential future threat to human receptors above EPA's range of generally acceptable levels
(10"4 to 10"6) would result from exposure to contaminants in Site 33 soil or shallow bedrock
groundwater. Groundwater in the US would pose an unacceptable health risk (cancer and
noncancer) to a future off-base resident. However, since the risk assessment was performed,
groundwater samples collected during interim monitoring have not detected contaminants
at concentrations above MCLs. During the 1994 groundwater sampling rounds, all
concentrations were nondetect, indicating that no groundwater contamination remains at
Site 33 to be remediated.
The ecological risk assessment indicated that there was a limited potential risk posed to
ecological receptors at Site 33 as a result of contaminants in surficial soil. However,
because of the general industrial use of the site, the area is of limited ecological value and
is considered unsuitable as a natural habitat. Therefore, RAOs based on ecological risk
were not developed.
The qualitative leaching evaluation performed for Site 33 soils indicated that leaching of
arsenic to groundwater is of potential concern. To address this risk, the following RAO was
developed for Site 33:
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxl^a 68 09/15/95
-------
Minimize leaching of contaminants from soil to groundwater or surface water
that would result in groundwater or surface water contamination
concentrations that may present an unacceptable health risk, given the site-
specific exposure scenarios.
Site 32/36
Of the five groundwater units evaluated in the human health risk assessment, the
overburden and shallow bedrock groundwater units were found to pose a health risk to
potential off-base residents in excess of EPA's generally acceptable criteria (cancer risk of
KT4 and hazard index of 1). Although the bedrock groundwater posed a slight noncancer
health risk (hazard index of 2), the area was not considered for remediation because the
hazard index was marginally above the criterion. RAOs were developed for the dissolved-
phase portion of the Site 32/36 overburden and shallow bedrock groundwater as follows:
Protect human receptors from ingestion of, or direct contact with,
contaminated groundwater that may present an unacceptable health risk (total
cancer risk greater than 10"*, or a hazard index greater than 1).
Comply with chemical-specific ARARs and/or established background levels
for specific contaminants in groundwater, as appropriate.
Prevent discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface water bodies where
such discharges may cause unacceptable risks to human health and/or the
environment.
Prevent migration of contaminants toward the Haven well.
These RAOs were developed for the Site 32/36 dissolved plume. RAOs that address the
area that will be physically and hydraulically contained as part of the Site 32/36 source area
remedial action are included in the Site 32/36 ROD. Human health risks and ecological
risks for the Site 32/36 source area were evaluated in the Site 32/36 Draft Final RI Report
(G-583) and are being addressed in the Site 32/36 source area ROD.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 69 09/15/95
-------
Site 34
The human health risk assessment indicated that overburden and bedrock hot spot
groundwater may pose a health risk to potential future off-base residents in excess of EPA's
range of generally acceptable levels (KT* to 10"6). To address this potential risk, RAOs were
developed for Site 34 groundwater and are identical to those for the dissolved-phase
groundwater contamination outside the Site 32 containment zone.
Only the wetlands at Site 34 were evaluated with respect to ecological risk; the results
indicated that several contaminants may pose a potential risk to receptors in the wetlands.
The majority of the risk in the Site 34 wetlands is attributable to iron, vanadium, and arsenic
exposure, based on estimated concentrations in earthworms that impact the potential risk
calculated for the shrew and the American robin, the potential receptors. There is a great
deal of uncertainty associated with the calculation of bioaccumulation factors for inorganic
chemicals in earthworms. Additionally, earthworm ingestion rates for both the shrew and
the American robin were considered to be elevated based on subsequent review of the risk
assessment (G-696). Individual hazard indices calculated for these metals are therefore
questionable, given these uncertainties.
The Site 34 wetlands constitute the largest wetlands located within Zone 3 and provide one
of the few potential wildlife habitats in the area. The majority of the wetland is forested
with large, deciduous trees. In addition, the locations where the Site 34 sediments exceed
ecological risk criteria are discontinuous and dispersed throughout the wetland. Remedial
activities (i.e., excavation) would require that a portion of the area be cleared and would
likely result in greateradverse impacts to the environment than those caused by the isolated
areas of risk. It would likely require a long period of time (e.g., 50 to 100 years) for the
area to naturally restore itself. Therefore, an RAO was not developed for the Site 34
wetlands.
MK01\R!T:00628026.004\zone3nxi.sa 70 09/15/95
-------
Human health risks for current or potential future receptors were evaluated for the Site 34
source area in the Site 34 Draft Final RI Report (G-579) and have been addressed in the
Site 34 ROD.
Sites 35/38/39
As discussed in Section VI, the results of the baseline risk assessment for Zone 3 indicated
that no unacceptable current or potential future threat to human receptors above EPA's
range of generally acceptable levels (10"* to 10"6) would result from exposure to
contaminants in Site 35, 38, or 39 soil. Only wetlands areas at Site 39 were evaluated with
regard to ecological risk and, although elevated ecological risks were calculated for Site 39,
this site is not considered a habitat conducive to local wildlife (as with Site 33). As a result,
RAOs were not developed based on ecological risk.
Qualitative and quantitative evaluations conducted to assess contaminant leaching potential
indicated that organic contaminants at Site 38 and both organic and inorganic contaminants
at Site 39 were of potential concern. To protect human receptors from the potential risks
posed by this leaching concern, RAOs were developed for Sites 38 and 39 soils that are
identical to those developed for Site 33.
The risk assessment revealed that Site 35/38/39 overburden and shallow bedrock
groundwater may pose an unacceptable potential future threat to human health. To address
these potential risks, RAOs were developed for groundwater that consist of the same RAOs
developed for the dissolved-phase groundwater contamination outside the Site 32
containment zone.
Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches
The results of the human health risk assessment indicated that contaminants in sediment in
Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches did not result in unacceptable risk (cancer or
noncancer) to current or potential future receptors. Based on a regulatory comparison of
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodia 71 09/15/95
-------
ER-Ls with maximum detected concentrations of contaminants in sediment and a
comparison of maximum detected concentrations with EqP method-derived concentrations,
contaminants detected in the sediment in .both ditches resulted in potential unacceptable
ecological risks. Inorganic contamination in Upper Newfields Ditch and organic and
inorganic contamination in Upper Grafton Ditch are to be addressed by the following RAO:
Protect ecological receptors from direct contact with, or ingestion of, sediment
containing contaminants at concentrations that may present a potential
unacceptable risk.
The results of the human health risk assessment indicated that the surface water in Upper
Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches did not pose an unacceptable risk to human
receptors. The ecological risk assessment determined, however, that maximum detected
concentrations of inorganic and organic compounds in surface water posed potential
unacceptable risks to selected ecological receptors based on calculated hazard quotients.
The hazard quotients calculated, however, were generally within the range of 1 to 10; thus
they are subject to interpretation based on inherent uncertainties in the calculations, or the
compounds detected were typical of those found in other surface waters at Pease AFB. In
addition, sediments that were determined to be potential sources of surface water
contamination in Upper Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches are addressed by the RAO
presented above for sediments. Therefore, RAOs for surface water in Zone 3 were not
established.
Figure 12 presents a summary of the areas in Zone 3 requiring remediation based on the
RAOs.
B. Technology and Alternative Development
CERCLA and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (NCP)
established the process by which remedial alternatives are evaluated and selected. In
accordance with this process, a range of alternatives was developed for Zone 3 that
addressed the various media.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
GROUNDWATER UANAQEMENT ZONE (GMZ)
JoQ
15"
^-^r?; ^
v
*Ł
.'?
I
HAVEN
WEIL
•«
•Sd,4*--"'
s
LEQ6HO:
ConcnMe eucratt paiWng
— apron and tadway*
= RoadatatphalVBawd)
: = = Unpavadioadaandlrailt
fWl BuHlnoawMi locator nuntera
•»-»- Fence
Surface water drainage
— — — — OroundN
boundary
Area »*h HHCi above MCLt
In groundwaiar
Ana «H*t AHCs above MCLs
In groundwaler
Location ol ea* tequiring
Location of eedknent raquMng
Welandi area wMi limited ecological
n»k» not proposed u be remedialed
*
KMEMFECT
ssxtts*
P*f B torn OMpSaeW «•»• 11/ZW7
ZO*»3
—_. 14, RMMO of DvcWon
PMM Air Fate* BM
FIGURE 12
AREAS REQUIRING REMEDIATION
-------
With respect to source area control and management of migration of contaminated
groundwater in Zone 3, the FS developed a range of alternatives in which treatment that
reduces the TMV of the hazardous substances is a principal element. This range included
an alternative that removes or destroys hazardous substances to the maximum extent
feasible, eliminating or minimizing to the degree possible the need for long-term
management. This range also included alternatives that treat the principal threats posed by
the zone, but vary in the degree of treatment employed and the quantities and
characteristics of the treatment residuals and untreated waste that must be managed;
alternative(s) that involve little or no treatment but provide protection through engineering
or institutional controls; and a no-action alternative.
In Section 3 of the Zone 3 Draft Final FS Report (G-628), technologies were identified,
assessed, and screened based on implementability, effectiveness, and cost. These
technologies were combined into source control and management-of-migration alternatives
and were presented in Section 4 of the Zone 3 FS Report. The purpose of the initial
screening was to narrow the number of potential remedial actions for further detailed
analysis while preserving a range of options. Each alternative was then evaluated in detail
and screened in Section 5 of the Zone 3 FS Report.
In summary, of the 6 source control and 10 management-of-migration remedial alternatives
screened in Section 4 of the Zone 4 FS Report, 5 source control and 4 management-of-
migration remedial alternatives were retained for detailed analysis. These alternatives were
combined to form seven alternatives that were developed to include both source area
actions and management-of-migration controls. Table 29 identifies the seven alternatives
that were retained through the detailed analysis.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sa 75 . 09/15/95
-------
VIII. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES
This section provides a summary of each alternative that was evaluated in detail in Section
5 of the Zone 3 FS Report. A detailed tabular assessment of each alternative is presented
in Tables 5.2-1 through 5.2-7 of the Zone 3 FS Report.
The alternatives analyzed for Zone 3 are as follows:
A
• Alternative 1: No action (always considered, as required by CERCLA).
• Alternative 2: Limited action/institutional controls/land use restrictions on
the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
• Alternative 3A: Asphalt cap over soil and excavation of sediment with off-
base disposal; GMZ maintenance through groundwater collection and
intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption at two treatment facilities; subsurface groundwater recharge; and
land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
• Alternative 3B: Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal; GMZ
maintenance through groundwater collection and intrazonal treatment using
greensand filtration, air stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment
facilities; subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use restrictions on the
Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
• • Alternative 4: Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal; source
area groundwater collection and intrazonal treatment using greensand
filtration, air stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment facilities;
subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use restrictions on the Zone 3
area to prohibit future residential use.
• Alternative 5: Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal; GMZ
maintenance with additional contaminant removal through groundwater
collection and intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping,
and carbon adsorption at a single treatment facility; subsurface groundwater
recharge; and land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
• Alternative 6: Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base treatment and/or
disposal; source area and GMZ maintenance through groundwater collection
and intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption at two treatment facilities; subsurface groundwater recharge; and
land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
MK01\RFT:00628Q26.004\zone3ro
-------
Alternative 1; No Action
The no-action alternative was evaluated in detail in the FS to serve as a baseline for
comparison with the other remedial alternatives under consideration. Under this alternative,
no treatment or containment of source materials would occur and no action would be taken
to control potential migration of contaminants in Zone 3 groundwater. However, there
would be some soil and groundwater monitoring as part of the SARA review process.
Estimated time for design and construction: Not applicable.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: $27,300.
Estimated operation and maintenance (O&M) cost: $356,100.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $383,400.
Alternative 2; Limited Action/Institutional Controls/Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3
Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
This alternative would consist of the following components:
• Long-term soil and sediment sampling to provide data for the SARA review
process.
• Establishment of a GMZ.
• Groundwater sampling and analysis.
• Land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use and
to control future land development.
• No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
• Natural attenuation and biodegradation of the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating from the Site 32/36 source area.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxl.sb 77 09/15/95
-------
Estimated time for design and construction: 2 months.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: $174,400.
Estimated O&M cost (net present worth): $1,449,100.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $1,623,500.
Alternative 3A; Asphalt Cap Over Soil and Excavation of Sediment with Off-Base Disposal:
GMZ Maintenance through Croundwater Collection and Intiraiftflfll Treatment Using
Greensand Filtration. Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities;
Subsurface Groundwater Recharge: and Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to
Prohibit Future Residential Use
This alternative would consist of the following components:
• Excavation of contaminated sediment from Upper Grafton and Upper
Newfields Ditches.
• Implementation of sedimentation and erosion control measures during
excavation.
• Transportation and consolidation of sediment /off-base.
• Construction of a single-barrier asphalt cap over soil at Sites 33, 38, and 39.
• Implementation of land use restrictions for capped areas.
• Establishment of a GMZ and implementation of institutional controls to
restrict future use of groundwater in Zone 3.
• Installation of groundwater recovery wells, extraction pumps, and transmission
system. Specifically, groundwater recovery wells would be installed for
management of migration of the dissolved-phase contaminant plume outside
the containment area at Sites 32/36, and for management of migration at Site
34 and southwest of Sites 34 and 39.
• Upgrades of existing pilot GWTPs at Sites 32/36 and 34.
• Construction of recharge trenches in the northern sector of Zone 3 for the
discharge of treated groundwater.
• Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.
• Long-term environmental monitoring.
• Land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxlJb 78 09/15/95
-------
No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
Natural attenuation and biodegradation of .the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating from the Site 32/36 source area with a contingency to
implement additional remedial measures in the event that natural attenuation
does not meet expectations.
Estimated time for design and construction: 8 months.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: $6,827,600.
Estimated O&M cost (net present worth): $8,877,800.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $15,705,400.
Alternative 3B: Excavation of Soil and Sediment with Off-Base Disposal; GMZ Maintenance
through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration. Air
Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities: Subsurface Groundwater
Recharge; and Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential
Use
This alternative would consist of the following components:
• Excavation of contaminated sediment from Upper Grafton and Upper
Newfields Ditches.
• Implementation of sedimentation and erosion control measures during
excavation.
• Excavation of soil exceeding cleanup goals from Sites 33, 38, and 39.
• Transportation and consolidation of sediment and soil off-base.
• Establishment of excavation limitations on soils beneath Building 227;
remediation of soil would be required if the building is removed.
• Backfill and compaction of soil excavation areas with clean fill.
• Establishment of deed restrictions prohibiting excavation below the water
table in source areas.
• Establishment of a GMZ and implementation of deed restrictions to restrict
use of groundwater in Zone 3.
MKQl\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb 79 09/15/95
-------
Installation of groundwater recovery wells, extraction pumps, and transmission
system. Specifically, groundwater recovery wells would be installed for
management of migration of the dissolved-phase contaminant plume outside
the containment area at Sites 32/36, and for management of migration at Site
34 and southwest of Sites 34 and 39.
Upgrades of existing pilot GWTPs at Sites 32/36 and 34.
Construction of recharge trenches in the northern sector of Zone 3 for the
discharge of treated groundwater.
Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.
Long-term environmental monitoring.
Land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
Natural attenuation and biodegradation of the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating from the Site 32/36 source area with a contingency to
implement additional remedial measures in the event that natural attenuation
does not meet expectations.
Estimated time for design and construction: 8 months.
Estimated time of.operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: $6,662,100.
Estimated O&M cost (netpresent worth): $7,641,000.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $14,303,100.
Alternative 4; Excavation of Soil and Sediment with Off-Base Disposal; Source
Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,. Air
Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities: Subsurface Groundwater
Rechary; and T-jfld VK Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential
Use.
This alternative would consist of the following components:
• Excavation of contaminated sediment from Upper Newfields Ditch and Upper
Grafton Ditch.
• Sediment and erosion control during sediment excavation.
MK01\OT:00628026.004\zone3nxLsb 80 09/15/95
-------
Excavation of soil exceeding cleanup goals from Sites 33, 38, and 39.
Transportation and consolidation of sediment and soil off-base.
Establishment of excavation limitations on soils beneath Building 227;
remediation of soil would be required if the building is removed.
Backfilling and compaction of soil excavation areas with clean fill.
Establishment of a GMZ in Zone 3 and implementation of institutional
controls to restrict future use of groundwater in Zone 3.
Groundwater extraction in source areas to remove additional contaminant
mass from the subsurface. Groundwater recovery wells would be installed at
Sites 33, 34, 35, and 39.
Groundwater treatment at two treatment facilities at Sites 32/36 and 34,
followed by subsurface groundwater recharge of treated groundwater.
Construction of recharge trenches in the northern sector of Zone 3 for
discharge of treated groundwater.
Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.
Long-term environmental monitoring.
Land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
Natural attenuation and biodegradation of the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating from the Site 32/36 source area with a contingency to
implement additional remedial measures in the event that natural attenuation
does not meet expectations.
Estimated time for design and construction: 8 months.
Estimated time of operation: 15 years.
Estimated capital cost: $1,683,900.
Estimated O&M cost (net present worth): $5,299,500.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $6,983,400.
MK01\RFr:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb 81 09/15/95
-------
Alternative S; Excavation of Soil and Sediment with Off-Base Disposal! GMZ Maintenance
with Additional Contaminant Removal through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal
Treatment Using Greensand Filtration. Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at a Single
Treatment Facility: Subsurface Groundwater Recharge: and Land Use Restrictions on the
Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
This alternative would consist of the following components:
• Excavation of contaminated sediment from Upper Newfields Ditch and Upper
Grafton Ditch.
• Sediment and erosion control during sediment excavation.
• Excavation of soil exceeding cleanup goals from Sites 33, 38, and 39.
• Establishment of excavation limitations on the soils beneath Building 227;
remediation of soil would be required if the building is removed.
• Transportation and consolidation of sediment and soil off-base.
• Backfilling and compaction of soil excavations with clean fill.
• Establishment of a GMZ in Zone 3 and implementation of institutional
controls to restrict future use of groundwater in Zone 3.
• Groundwater extraction to control migration and maintain the GMZ.
Specifically, groundwater recovery wells would be installed for management
of migration of the dissolved-phase contaminant plume outside the
containment area at Sites 32/36 and for management of migration at Site 34
and southwest of Sites 34 and 39.
• Additional groundwater extraction in the source areas at Sites 33,34,35, and
39 to remove additional contaminant mass from the subsurface.
• Groundwater treatment at a single treatment facility near Site 32/36, followed
by subsurface groundwater recharge of treated groundwater.
• Construction of recharge trenches in the northern sector of Zone 3 for
discharge of treated groundwater,
• Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.
• Long-term environmental monitoring.
• Land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
MK01\RPT«0628Q26.004\zone3todJb 82 09/15/95
-------
No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
Natural attenuation and biodegradation of the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating from the Site 32/36 source area with a contingency to
implement additional remedial measures in the event that natural attenuation
does not meet expectations.
Estimated time for design and construction: 8 months.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: $2,369,900.
Estimated O&M cost (net present worth): $10,511,500.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $12,881,400.
Alternative 6. The Selected Remedy; Excavation of Soil and Sediment with Off-Base
Treatment and/or Disposal: Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater
Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration. Air Stripping, and
Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities: Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
This alternative would consist of the following components:
• Excavation of sediment exceeding cleanup goals from Upper Newfields Ditch
and Upper Grafton Ditch.
• Sediment and erosion control during sediment excavation.
• Excavation of soil exceeding cleanup goals from Sites 33, 38, and 39.
• Transportation and consolidation of sediment and soil off-base for treatment
and/or disposal.
• Establishment of excavation limitations on soils beneath Building 227;
remediation of soil would be required if the building is removed.
• Backfilling and compaction of soil and sediment excavations with clean fill.
• Land use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
• Establishment of a GMZ in Zone 3 and implementation of institutional
controls to restrict future use of groundwater in Zone 3 and limit pumping of
the Haven well to prevent the interference with contamination migration
control to be implemented under the Zone 3 remedial action.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb 83 09/15/95
-------
Groundwater extraction to control contaminant migration and maintain a
GMZ. Specifically, groundwater recovery wells would be installed for
management of migration southwest of Sites 34 and 39.
Additional groundwater extraction in the source areas at Sites 34, 35, and 39
to remove additional contaminant mass from the subsurface.
Groundwater treatment at two treatment facilities at Sites 32/36 and 34,
followed by subsurface groundwater recharge of treated groundwater.
Construction of recharge trenches southwest of the runway for discharge of
treated groundwater.
Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.
Long-term environmental monitoring.
No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
Natural attenuation and biodegradation of the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating outside of the 32/36 TI containment area with a contingency
to implement additional remedial measures in the event that natural
attenuation does not meet expectations.
Estimated time for design and construction: 8 months.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: $7,126,200.
Estimated O&M cost (netpresent worth): $7,955,900.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $15,082,100.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zoae3rod4b 84 09/15/95
-------
IX. SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
Section 121(b)(l) of CERCLA presents several factors, that at a minirmjm, EPA is required
to consider in its assessment of alternatives. Building upon these specific statutory
mandates, the NCP articulates nine evaluation criteria to be used in assessing the individual
remedial alternatives.
A detailed analysis was performed on the alternatives using the nine evaluation criteria in
order to select a zone remedy. The following is a summary of the comparison of each
alternative's strength and weakness with respect to the nine evaluation criteria. These
criteria are summarized as follows:
Threshold Criteria
The following two threshold criteria must be met in order for the alternatives to be eligible
for selection in accordance with the NCP:
1. Overall protection of human health and the environment addresses whether a
remedy provides adequate protection and describes how risks posed through
each pathway are eliminated, or reduced or controlled through treatment,
engineering controls, or institutional controls.
2. Compliance with ARARs addresses whether a remedy will meet all federal and
more stringent state applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
and/or provide grounds for invoking a waiver.
Primary Balancing Criteria
The following five criteria are used to compare and evaluate the elements of one alternative
with another once the threshold criteria have been met:
3. Long-term effectiveness and permanence assesses alternatives based on the
long-term effectiveness and permanence they afford, along with the degree of
certainty that they will prove successful.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb 85 09/15/95
-------
4. Reduction of taxidty, mobility, or volume through treatment addresses the
degree to which alternatives employ recycling or treatment that reduces TMV,
including how treatment is used to address the principal threats posed by the
site.
5. Short-term effectiveness addresses the period of time needed to achieve
protection and any adverse impacts on human health and the environment
that may be posed during the construction and implementation period, until
cleanup goals are achieved. It also evaluates how long it would take for an
alternative to attain RAOs.
6.. Implementability addresses the technical and administrative feasibility of a
remedy, including the availability of materials and services needed to
implement a particular option.
7. Cost includes estimated capital and O&M costs, as well as present-worth costs.
Modifying Criteria
The following modifying criteria are used in the final evaluation of remedial alternatives
after public comments on the RI/FS and Proposed Plan are reviewed:
8. State acceptance addresses the state's position and key concerns related to the
preferred alternative and other alternatives, and the state's comments on
ARARs or the proposed use of waivers.
9. Community acceptance addresses the public's general response to the
alternatives described in the Proposed Plan and RI/FS report. Community
acceptance of the Proposed Plan for Zone 3 was evaluated based on written
comments and verbal comments received in public meetings during the public
comment period.
A detailed tabular assessment of each alternative according to the nine criteria can be found
in Tables 52-1 through 5.2-7 of the Zone 3 FS Report.
Following the detailed analysis of each individual alternative, a comparative analysis,
focusing on the relative performance of each alternative against the nine criteria, was
conducted. This comparative analysis is presented in Table 30.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rcxlJb 86 09/15/95
-------
The following subsections present the nine criteria, including the two modifying criteria not
discussed in the Zone 3 FS Report, a brief narrative summary of the alternatives, and the
strengths and weaknesses of the alternatives according to the detailed comparative analysis.
A. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
The no-action alternative would not meet this criterion because this alternative provides no
minimization of soil contaminants leaching to groundwater, no management of groundwater
migration or contaminant mass removal, or restrictions on groundwater use. Ecological
receptors would continue to be exposed to sediment. Alternative 2 would meet some
aspects of this criterion via deed restrictions on groundwater use and construction activities
below the water table. Ecological receptors, however, would continue being exposed to
contaminated sediment.
Alternatives 3A, 3B, and 4 provide greater overall protection than Alternatives 1 and 2
through reduction of groundwater contaminants and minimization of leaching of soil
contaminants by capping or removal of soil. Contaminated sediments would be removed
from Zone 3, thereby eliminating the risk of ecological receptors posed by contact with
contaminated sediment. Alternatives 3A and 3B provide only management of migration for
groundwater, and Alternative 4 provides source area groundwater extraction, but does not
actively collect migrating groundwater. All three alternatives involve the establishment of
GMZs and the implementation of land use restrictions on groundwater use and construction
activities below the water table.
Alternatives 5 and 6 provide even greater protection to human health in that both migrating
groundwater and source area groundwater are extracted and treated. Soil and sediment that
would be excavated would be disposed of at an off-base site, thereby eliminating the
leaching potential of soil and the risk to ecological receptors from contact with contaminated
sediment. TCE-contaminated soils from Site 39 would be shipped to a RCRA TSD facility,
eliminating the on-site leaching potential. Alternative 6, the selected remedy, would provide
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
the highest level of protection because contaminants would be eliminated more effectively
through the use of two treatment facilities.
B. Compliance with ARARs
Alternatives 1 and 2 would not be expected to comply with chemical-specific ARARs during
the 30-year assessment period. However, in the long term, Alternatives 1 and 2 would
achieve cleanup goals for soil and natural attenuation processes would restore groundwater
to chemical-specific ARARs and/or established background levels for specific contaminants.
With the exception of the no-action and limited action/institutional controls alternatives, all
alternatives would likely meet groundwater ARARs within 30 years. As presented in the
Natural Attenuation Modeling for Zones 2 and 3 Letter Report (G-742), the estimated time
frames for the aqueous plumes located in Zone 3 to naturally attenuate once contaminated
soils have been excavated would be approximately 22 years. In the event that long-term
monitoring suggests that natural attenuation is not performing according to expectations, the
Air Force would consider other remedial measures.
It is expected that all alternatives would comply with location- and action-specific ARARs,
with the exception of Alternatives 1 and 2, which would not address ecological risks resulting
from exposure to sediment. These alternatives would therefore not comply with location-
specific ARARs regarding protection of wetlands, fish, and aquatic life.
C Long-Tenn Effectiveness and Permanence
Alternative 1 would not reduce potential risks to human health and the environment, except
possibly in the very long term, because soil contaminants would continue to leach, sediment
would continue to pose a risk to ecological receptors, and contaminated groundwater would
continue to migrate from source areas.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
Alternative 2 would not provide any reduction in risk from contact with sediments by
ecological receptors. However, protection of human health would be achieved through the
implementation of deed restrictions and the establishment of a GMZ. In the long term,
reduction of contaminant concentrations through natural attenuation processes is expected
to occur; however, reduction would likely require more than 30 years in highly contaminated
areas.
Alternatives 3A and 3B entail asphalt capping and soil excavation, respectively. Alternative
3A prevents infiltration through the construction of an asphalt cap, whereas Alternative 3B
removes the soil from the sites and replaces it with clean fill. Capping the soils in place
would result in greater residual risk than excavation due to deterioration of the asphalt cap
over time. Both alternatives provide the same management-of-migration scenario, which
involves extraction at the boundaries of the GMZ. Source control measures would be very
effective in the long term. Management-of-migration activities would likely require several
decades to collect a majority of the groundwater in Zone 3 that exceeds cleanup goals.
Alternative 4 would be as effective as Alternative 3B when comparing the excavation of soil
and sediment; however, Alternative 4 provides a higher degree of long-term effectiveness
and permanence through source area groundwater extraction at Sites 33, 34, 35, and 39.
It is expected that source area groundwater extraction would be required for at least 5 to
15 years to reduce levels in most source areas to the point at which migrating groundwater
would not greatly exceed cleanup goals. However, unlike Alternatives 3A and 3B, no
management of contaminated groundwater that has already migrated off-site is proposed;
it is expected that several decades would be required before contaminant levels in migrating
groundwater were naturally reduced to cleanup goals.
Alternatives 5 and 6 would likely provide a higher degree of effectiveness and permanence
in the long term than the previously discussed alternatives. Alternatives 5 and 6 both
propose more comprehensive scenarios of source area groundwater extraction and
management-of-migration than those proposed in Alternatives 3A, 3B, and 4. Excavation
of soil and sediment would be as discussed previously. Alternative 6, the selected remedy,
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb 89 09/15/95
-------
is expected to provide the highest degree of long-term effectiveness and permanence
because it would use two treatment facilities to remove contaminants from extracted
groundwater rather than one proposed under Alternative 5.
D. Reduction in Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume of Contaminants
Because Alternatives 1 and 2 do not involve any action to remove contaminants from any
of the media, no reduction in TMV of contaminants would occur except through natural
attenuation processes.
Alternatives 3A and 36 would provide the same reduction in mobility of contaminants;
however, Alternative 3B would reduce the volume of contaminated soil at the sites by
removal. Because the non-RCRA soils do not present a human health risk and because the
material is not expected to exceed TCLP levels, treatment is not expected and, therefore,
no reduction in toxicity would occur in either alternative. A small volume of soil (133 yd3)
would require disposal at a RCRA TSD facility. Some reduction in TMV of contaminants
would be achieved through groundwater extraction. This would occur at the boundaries of
the GMZ, but not in source area groundwater, except through natural attenuation processes.
Alternatives 4, 5, and 6 all provide greater reductions in the TMV of contaminants.
Alternative 4 would reduce the toxicity and volume of contaminants in source areas;
however, contaminant mobility would not be reduced as much because management of
migration is not addressed. Alternatives 5 and 6 would provide similar reductions in TMV
because similar source area actions and management-of-migration actions are proposed.
E. Short-Term Effectiveness
Alternatives 1 and 2 involve the fewest short-term effects on human health and the
environment because they do not involve activities that disturb soil, sediment, and
groundwater, except during sampling activities. However, Alternatives 3A, 3B, 4, 5, and 6
all involve similar short-term effects on site workers, the surrounding community, and the
NOai\WT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
environment because they all involve soil, sediment, and groundwater removal, except
Alternative 3A, which does not involve handling of soil. There is the potential for
accidental spills of excavated materials during transportation; however, proper procedures
should minimize the possibility of this occurring.
Potential impacts on workers and the surrounding community could occur through the
release of organic vapors during excavation activities during implementation of Alternatives
3A, 3B, 4, 5, and 6. Methods such as the use of an interim geomembrane cover during
excavation, use of appropriate worker personal protective equipment (PPE), implementation
of dust and odor suppression measures to control fugitive dust emissions, and air monitoring
would be implemented to ensure the protection of workers and area residents during
remedial activities.
There would be some short-term effects on the drainageways during sediment excavation.
However, precautions would be taken to minimize the affected areas; disturbed areas would
be restored after completion of remedial activities.
Under Alternatives 1 and 2, because there would be no active remediation, protection would
not be achieved for many decades. While none of the other alternatives is expected to
attain cleanup goals in the short term, Alternatives 5 and 6 are expected to achieve cleanup
goals in the shortest time frame when compared with Alternatives 3A, 36, and 4.
Alternative 4 provides source area groundwater extraction and it is expected that source
area groundwater extraction would be required for at least 5 to 15 years to reduce
contaminant levels in most source areas to the point at which migrating groundwater would
not greatly exceed cleanup goals. No management of contaminated groundwater that has
already migrated off-site is proposed; it is expected that several decades would be required
before contaminant levels in migrating groundwater were naturally reduced to cleanup goals.
Alternatives 5 and 6 both propose source area groundwater extraction and management-of-
migration groundwater extraction, and, therefore, are expected to achieve cleanup goals
outside of the Site 32 source area in the shortest time frame.
MK01\RPT:0062S026.004\zone3rod.sb 91 09/15/95
-------
F. Implementability
Alternatives 1 and 2 would be the easiest to implement because limited activities (e.g.,
sampling) are proposed. Alternative 2 would be slightly more complicated than
Alternative 1 because a GMZ would be established and deed restrictions implemented.
Alternatives 3A, 3B, and 4 involve excavation of sediment and groundwater extraction in
combination with either asphalt capping or soil excavation. All of the technologies are
proven and fairly easy to implement All three alternatives involve the upgrading of existing
facilities, which requires less construction time than if the facilities were new. During
startup of the upgraded treatment plants, some difficulties may be encountered, which is
typical of new facility startups. Sediment handling problems may be encountered (e.g., flow
rerouting, wet excavation, and material handling) because of high water content. However,
if excavation of sediment is performed in low-precipitation months, some of these problems
could be avoided
Alternatives 5 and 6 involve more groundwater extraction locations than Alternatives 3A,
3B, and 4, and therefore would require more effort Alternative 5 involves the construction
of a single treatment facility in a new location, using new equipment and equipment
salvaged from the existing GWTPs, while Alternative 6 would simply upgrade two existing
GWTPs. The soil and sediment handling in Alternatives 5 and 6 would be as discussed for
Alternatives 3A, 3B, and 4. Because RCRA TSD facilities may be found nearby and the
soil volume exceeding TCLP criteria is small (133 yd3), this portion of the soil disposal for
Alternatives 3A, 3B, 4, 5, and 6 is not expected to be difficult to implement
Alternatives involving'groundwater extraction and treatment (Alternatives 3A, 3B, 4, 5,
and 6) would require air emissions testing of the organics treatment system to ensure
compliance with air quality requirements. Groundwater disposal via subsurface recharge
would require extensive long-term monitoring to ensure compliance with appropriate state
and federal requirements.
MKDl\RFT:00628Q26.004\zone3ra
-------
AD of the alternatives involve technologies and services that are readily available through
multiple vendors. RCRA TSD facilities are readily available to receive the small volume
of TCE-contaminated soil.
G. Cost
The estimated net present-worth costs of the alternatives are as follows:
Remedial Alternative
1. No action (always considered, as required by
CERCLA).
2. Limited action/institutional controls/land use
restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
3A. Asphalt cap over soil and excavation of sediment with
off-base disposal; GMZ maintenance through
groundwater collection and intrazonal treatment using
greensand filtration, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption at two treatment facilities; subsurface
groundwater recharge; and land use restrictions on the
Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
3B. Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal;
GMZ maintenance through groundwater collection
and intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air
stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment
facilities; subsurface groundwater recharge; and land
use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
4. Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal;
source area groundwater collection and intrazonal
treatment-using greensand filtration, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption at two treatment facilities;
subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use
restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
Capital Cost
$27^00
$174,400
$6,827,600
$6,662,100
$1,683,900
30-Year
Present
Worth
O&M Cost
$356,100
$1,449,100
$8,877,800
$7,641,000
$5,299^00
Total
Present-
Worth Cost
$383,400
$1,623,500
$15,705,400
$14,303,100
$6,983,400
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxl^b
93
09/15/95
-------
Remedial Alternative
Capital Cost
30-Year
Present
Worth
O&MCost
Total
Present-
Worth Cost
Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal;
GMZ maintenance with additional contaminant
removal through groundwater collection and intrazonal
treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption at a single treatment facility,
subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use
restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
$2,369,900
$10,511400
$12,881,400
6. Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base
treatment and/or disposal; source area and GMZ
maintenance through groundwater collection and
intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air
stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment
faculties; subsurface groundwater recharge; and land
use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
$7,126,200
$7,955,900
$15,082,100
H. State Acceptance
As summarized in Section n of this document, NHDES has been involved in the
environmental activities at Pease AFB since the mid-1980s. The RI was performed as an
Air Force Lead, with NHDES and EPA oversight, in accordance with the FFA. NHDES
has reviewed this document and concurs with the selected remedy. A copy of the
Declaration of Concurrence is attached as Appendix B.
I. Community Acceptance
The comments received during the public comment periods and the public hearings on the
Zone 3 Proposed PlaiTare summarized in the Responsiveness Summary (see Appendix C).
Public comments were supportive of the proposed remedial action, and, as a result, the
selected remedy has not been modified from that presented in the Proposed Plan.
MK01\RFT«0628Q26.004\zooe3to(Lsb
94
09/15/95
-------
X. THE SELECTED REMEDY
The selected remedy (Alternative 6) for the remediation of Zone 3 involves the excavation
of contaminated soils and sediments and the extraction of contaminated groundwater. A
majority of the soil/sediment excavated from Zone 3 will not require treatment prior to
disposal as the material will likely pass the TCLP criteria testing. However, a small volume
from Site 39 will require disposal at a RCRA TSD facility because of the TCE
concentrations in the soil. Limitations would be placed on excavation of soils beneath
Building 227. If Building 227 is ever removed, remediation of underlying soils would be
required. The final disposal location of the non-RCRA soils and sediments excavated from
Zone 3 will be determined at the .time of remedial design. Groundwater will be extracted
from the source areas at Sites 34, 35, and 39 and from the area southwest of Sites 34 and
39 and treated at two treatment facilities. A GMZ will be established for Zone 3 and
groundwater will be extracted in order to ensure that groundwater exceeding cleanup goals
and MCLs does not migrate beyond the GMZ. The groundwater use inside the GMZ will
be restricted in order to preclude the possible contact by human receptors to contaminated
groundwater. A TI Zone will be established within the Zone 3 GMZ in accordance with
the Site 32/36 source area ROD. Chemical-specific ARARs for groundwater will be waived
within this TI Zone. However, as part of the Zone 3 remedy, groundwater quality outside
the TI Zone and within Zone 3 will meet groundwater quality standards in a reasonable
time frame as defined by the NCP. The extracted groundwater will be treated at two
groundwater treatment plants located within Zone 3. The treated groundwater will likely
be disposed of in subsurface recharge trenches or seasonally used for land application in
accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
A. Methodology for Cleanup Goal Determination
Cleanup goals have been selected for each medium of concern in Zone 3. Cleanup goals
have been established for chemicals of concern identified in the risk assessment section of
the Zone 3 Draft Final RI Report (G-629) and for contaminants detected at levels
exceeding ARARs, risk-based concentrations, or background values.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb 95 09/15/95
-------
The approach used to determine risk-based concentrations is consistent with the approach
used to evaluate human health risk in the risk assessment section of the Zone 3 Draft Final
RI Report (G-629). This approach was originally presented in a protocols document
submitted to EPA New England and NHDES. This document was subsequently amended
and a revised version was resubmitted. In summary, risk-based concentrations were derived
for the chemicals of concern in each medium, based on the most reasonable maximally
exposed human receptor (current or future) for the medium. In addition, risk-based
concentrations were derived for a few chemicals that were not selected as chemicals of
concern in the risk assessment, but whose maximum reported concentration exceeded one
or more ARAR.
Risk-based concentrations were derived for each noncarcinogenic chemical in a medium
based on a goal of a hazard index of 1. For each carcinogenic chemical, the concentrations
were derived based on a goal of 10"6 (1-in-l million) lifetime cancer risk, with the following
exceptions. Some chemicals, although categorized by EPA as carcinogens, are not
considered to be carcinogenic through all exposure routes. For example, several metals,
including cadmium, chromium (VI), and nickel, are not classified as carcinogens through the
oral exposure route. Therefore, in deriving risk-based concentrations for a given medium,
if a carcinogenic chemical was not considered to be carcinogenic through the applicable
exposure routes, the risk-based concentration for the chemical was based on a hazard index
of 1 (i.e., noncancer risk).
Cleanup goals were selected after comparing maximum contaminant concentrations detected
for each contaminant of concern in each medium with appropriate chemical-specific
ARARs, background values, human health, and, if applicable, ecological risk-based
concentrations.
In general, where ARARs were available, the ARARs were selected as cleanup goals.
Where ARARs were not available, or if the basis on which the ARAR was established was
not consistent with Zone 3 exposure scenarios, a risk-based concentration was selected as
the cleanup goal. When ARARs were selected as the cleanup goals, a human health risk
MK01\RPTKX)628Q26.004\zone3iO(LA 96 09/15/95
-------
was calculated for the ARAR concentration. Cleanup goals were not established for
chemicals detected at maximum concentrations that were lower than appropriate ARARs
or risk-based concentrations. Cleanup goals for media in Zone 3 are summarized in the
subsections that follow.
B. Groundwater Cleanup Goals
The results of the evaluation of the human health risk assessment for groundwater indicated
that Zone 3 groundwater posed cancer and noncancer risks to future off-base residents in
exceedance of EPA's range of generally acceptable risk levels of KT* to 10"6, or a hazard
index of greater than 1, respectively. A comparison of maximum detected concentrations
in groundwater with ARARs indicated that several chemical-specific ARARs were exceeded.
Therefore, risk-based concentrations, chemical-specific ARARs, and background levels
(inorganics only) were evaluated in the development of cleanup goals for Zone 3
groundwater. Using this methodology, cleanup goals were established for Zone 3
groundwater; but no groundwater cleanup goals have been established for Sites 31 and 33.
The list of groundwater contaminants that were evaluated for establishing groundwater
cleanup goals was limited to groundwater chemicals of concern and groundwater
contaminants that exceed MCLs. Tables 31 and 32 present the maximum detected
concentration, chemical-specific ARARs, risk-based concentrations, and the cleanup goals
established for each contaminant. Cleanup goals were established for 26 contaminants in
Zone 3 groundwater. Contaminants for which cleanup goals were established were 18
•»
organics and 8 inorganics.
C. Soil Cleanup Goals
Table 33 presents the site-specific cleanup goals for soil in Zone 3. Cleanup goals were
developed to meet the general RAO of minimising leaching of contaminants to
groundwater. As discussed in Section VI, soil in Zone 3 does not pose unacceptable health
risks (cancer risks greater than 10"* or hazard indices greater than 1) to human receptors
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodj* 97 09/15/95
-------
resulting from the incidental ingestion of, or dermal contact with, contaminated soil. At
Sites 33 and 39, the ecological risk assessment revealed soil contaminants that posed
ecological risk exceeding EPA benchmark values; however, cleanup goals based on
ecological risk were not established due to the highly industrial nature of these sites.
For organic soil contaminants, cleanup goals were established using the Summers Leaching
Model. As discussed in the Supplement to the Zone 3 Draft Final FS Report (G-747),
cleanup goals were established when a leaching model target level was exceeded and the
contaminant also was detected in groundwater.
Cleanup goals for inorganic soil contaminants were developed based on a qualitative
leaching evaluation. Cleanup goals were established for a particular contaminant if the
maximum selected concentration of the contaminant in filtered groundwater samples
exceeded the filtered groundwater concentration from the groundwater background locations
as well as an ARAR, and the maximum soil concentration of the contaminant in soil
exceeded the maximum soil concentration detected at the soil background locations. The
cleanup goal selected was the maximum inorganic concentration detected at the soil
background locations.
D. Sediment Cleanup Goals
The cleanup goals established for sediments in Zone 3 are presented in Tables 34 and 35.
Three areas within Zone 3 were evaluated with regard to potential sediment contamination.
Results of the human health and ecological risk assessments indicated that the surface water
in the two ditches evaluated and the sediment in all three locations did not exceed a
cumulative cancer risk of 10"4, or an individual hazard quotient of 1. The development of
cleanup goals in Upper Newfields Ditch and Upper Grafton Ditch were based on the
ecological risk exceeding cumulative hazard quotients of 10 with individual contaminant
cleanup goals based on a hazard quotient of 1. A cumulative hazard quotient of 10 was
chosen instead of a cumulative hazard quotient of 1, because the ecological risk assessment
is very conservative and the degree of risk associated with a hazard quotient between 1 and
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zon«3rod^b 98 09/15/95
-------
10 is uncertain. Hazard quotients above 10 indicate that a potential ecological concern may
exist. For inorganic contaminants with associated NOAA ER-L criteria, the maximum
background sediment concentration was selected as the cleanup goal unless the NOAA
ER-L was higher than the maximum background value. The maximum background value
was chosen because this background concentration would be related to general industrial
use of the area and not site-specific activity. Cleanup goals were not established for
pesticides that exceeded the ecological risk-based RO because these compounds have been
determined to be representative of basewide conditions at Pease AFB that were not the
result of a CERCLA release.
Although concentrations of four metals exceeded risk-based ROs in the Site 34 wetlands,
cleanup goals were not established because of the uncertainties identified in the risk
calculations as discussed in Section IV. The Site 34 wetlands also provide one of the only
possible habitats for wildlife in Zone 3, and as such, the significant adverse impacts due to
remedial activities (i.e., excavation) were weighed against the possible risk at a few isolated
areas. In the case of the Site 34 wetlands, it was thought to be more detrimental to disturb
the wetlands than to leave the isolated areas of risk in the 18 acres of wetland habitat.
E. Description of Remedial Components
The selected remedy (Alternative 6) for Zone 3 will involve the following key components:
• Excavation and removal of sediment exceeding cleanup goals from Upper
Newfields and Upper Grafton Ditches. Excavated sediments will be
transported off-base for disposal. It is anticipated that the sediments may be
disposed of off-base without triggering Land Disposal Requirements (LDRs)
and minimum technology requirements for treatment. Sediment and erosion
control will occur during excavation. Sediment excavation areas will be
backfilled with clean fill.
• Excavation and removal of soil exceeding cleanup goals at Sites 33, 38, and
39. Excavated soil will be transported off-base for treatment and/or disposal.
Excavated soil from Site 39 will be transported off-base for treatment and
disposal at a RCRA TSD facility. Areas of soil excavation will be backfilled
with clean fill. Excavation limitations will be placed on soils located beneath
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb 99 09/15/95
-------
Building 227. If Building 227 is ever removed, remediation of the underlying
soils would be required.
• Groundwater extraction from Sites 34, 35, and 39 and treatment at the Site
32/36 and Site 34 groundwater treatment plants. Treated groundwater will
be discharged via subsurface recharge trenches or land application
(seasonally) at Pease AFB.
• Natural attenuation and biodegradation of the dissolved-phase contaminant
plume emanating from the Site 32/36 area outside of the TI containment
zone. Contaminant transport modeling performed for Site 32/36 groundwater
estimated that the groundwater cleanup goal for TCE (5 ^g/L) would be
achieved in approximately 22 years through natural attenuation. TCE is
considered an accurate predictor of the attenuation rates for Site 32/36
groundwater contaminants. In the event that natural attenuation does not
meet expectations, the Air Force will implement additional remedial
measures.
• Management of the Zone 3 groundwater will be implemented through a
groundwater management zone (GMZ) using New Hampshire regulations.
Institutional controls, such as land use restrictions, will be implemented to
restrict future use of groundwater within the Zone 3 GMZ.
• Long-term environmental performance monitoring in Zone 3, consisting of
groundwater sampling and analysis for GMZ maintenance, groundwater
extraction system performance monitoring, and process monitoring at both
groundwater treatment facilities.
• No further action under CERCLA for Sites 31 and 42.
Figure 13 presents a remedial process flow sheet for the selected remedy that depicts the
elements described. Detailed descriptions of the various components follow.
Sediment Excavn Off-Site Consolidation
The selected remedy involves the excavation of soil and sediment within Zone 3 that exceed
cleanup goals for organic and inorganic contaminants. Soil and sediment excavation will be
conducted with standard construction equipment. The soil and sediment will be properly
secured for transportation to the off-site disposal facility. A grading plan will be developed
for each site, and upon completion of excavation activities, excavated areas will be backfilled
with clean soil. Excavated non-RCRA soil will be transported off base; however, the final
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodjb 100 09/15/95
-------
SOIL/SEDIMENT
TCE contaminated soil
Organic contaminated soil
Inorganic contaminated soil
Soil excavation
Transport to an off-base
treatment and/or disposal facility
Contaminated sediment
Sediment excavation
Transport to an off-base
treatment and/or disposal facility
GROUNDWATER (FOR GMZ MAINTENANCE)
Site 35
CREW
(Concrete recovery
extraction well)
Phase
separation
(as needed)
Inorganics
pretreatment
VOC and
SVOC
removal
Additional
metals
removal
(as needed)
Discharge to
subsurface
recharge
trenches
Site 34 extraction wells
Site 39 collection trench
Aircraft Parking Apron
extraction wells
Same groundwater treatment processes
as above - separate treatment plant
Pease
Zone 3
Stage 4, Record of Decision
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
FIGURE 13
REMEDIAL PROCESS FLOW SHEET
SELECTED REMEDY
Z3ROON13|Z3ROOF13(Z3PPFXN3(Z3FS5tOS
-------
location for soil consolidation will not be determined until the time of remedial design.
TCE-contaminated soil at Site 39 will be disposed of at a RCRA TSD facility.
Confinnational sampling and analysis for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals will be performed to
define limits of excavations, and ensure removal of contaminated material.
Groiindwater Extraction
Groundwater would be extracted at Sites 34, 35, and 39 to control existing contaminant
plume migration as shown in Figure 14. Four areas have been identified for pumping to
prevent further migration of contamination and to maintain the groundwater contamination
within the boundary limits established by the GMZ. These areas consist of the source area
at Site 34 , the source area at Site 35 , the source area at Site 39 , and southwest of Sites
34 and 39 (aircraft parking apron area) . Groundwater will be extracted via extraction wells
at Site 34 and the aircraft parking apron area. At the source area at Site 39, a concrete
recovery extraction well (CREW) and collection trench will be installed. At Site 35, a
CREW was installed in 1992 and will be used for groundwater recovery. The location of
the recovery wells and CREWs and the pumping rates associated with each site in Zone 3
are also based on protecting the Haven well.
Groundwater Treatment
The treatment of groundwater extracted for both migration control and contaminant mass
removal will occur at two upgraded treatment facilities located at the existing Site 32/36 and
34 pilot GWTPs. Site 32 and Site 35 groundwater will be treated at the Site 32/36 GWTP
and Site 34, 39, and Parking Apron area groundwater will be treated at the Site 34 GWTP.
The existing facilities will be modified to treat higher contaminant concentrations, as well
as higher flow rates.
The Site 32/36 facility will be upgraded to include inorganics pretreatment, air emissions
treatment, and additional organics treatment. The extracted groundwater will undergo
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zooe3rodjb 102 09/15/95
-------
pretreatment to remove inorganics prior to the removal of the organics in order to increase
the efficiency of the organic treatment processes. The upgrade will be conducted in
association with Site 32/36 source control activities as described in the Site 32/36 Draft
Final FS Report (G-583). Management-of-migration remedial actions conducted in Zone
3 will need to be coordinated with Site 32/36 source control remedial activities, which are
being evaluated separately. The existing facility at Site 34 will be upgraded to include
additional organics treatment and treatment of air emissions.
Treated groundwater will be recharged to a recharge trench tentatively located southwest
of the runway as shown in Figure 14. The actual location for the recharge trench will be
finalized during the design process. The discharges to the trenches will be monitored to
ensure compliance with state and federal groundwater discharge requirements. It is also
possible that treated groundwater will be recharged seasonally via surface application (i.e.,
using treated groundwater for landscaping purposes at the Pease AFB Golf Course).
Construction Sequence
The treatment plant, groundwater recovery system (both migration control and source area
extraction), and the recharge trenches will be constructed at the same time. Construction
will require approximately 8 to 12 months, and would optimally be scheduled between
March and October to prevent delays caused by freezing weather. It is anticipated that the
excavation of soils will be performed after the groundwater treatment plant is constructed
in order to provide treatment for water extracted for construction dewatering. The sediment
excavation could be performed at any time during the construction season; however, it is
recommended that the sediment excavation occur in the drier months of the season, such
as July and August, to minimize the potential for erosion during excavation.
Institutional Controls and Monitoring
The use of groundwater within the GMZ (shown in Figure 14) will be prohibited, and the
restrictions will remain in place as long as the groundwater concentrations exceed MCLs
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodj* 103 09/15/95
-------
within the GMZ. Over time, it is anticipated that the size of the GMZ will be decreased;
however, there will most likely be a GMZ of some size for the duration of the alternative.
In addition, excavation limitations will be established for the soil located beneath Building
227. In the event that the building is removed at a later date, the soil will have to be
remediated.
Performance MoiHitPriP^ Plan
A detailed plan for monitoring the performance and effectiveness of the remedial actions
being taken within Zone 3 will be developed and submitted to NHDES and EPA for
approval during the remedial design phase of the remedial response.
The groundwater monitoring component of the plan will provide the data necessary to
monitor: 1) the effectiveness of the soil removal actions at Site 33, 36, 38, and 39, 2) the
effectiveness of the hydraulic containment system at Sites 34 and 39 and the effectiveness
of the groundwater extraction system in Zone 3 in protecting the Haven well, 3) the
groundwater quality and flow conditions in Zone 3, and 4) the effectiveness of natural
attenuation of groundwater components of the Zone 3 remedy. The performance of the
groundwater treatment plants will also be evaluated to ensure compliance with regulatory
requirements.
Performance and effectiveness data generated for the Performance Monitoring Plan will be
evaluated, at a minimum, after startup and during the 5-year reviews. If the Zone 3 remedy
fails to meet the performance standards specified in the Performance Monitoring Plan,
remedial system modifications, such as containment system enhancements, will be identified
and implemented. Additionally, if groundwater quality standards are exceeded outside the
Zone 3 GMZ, modifications will be required to address the restoration of groundwater
quality outside of the GMZ.
MK01\RFT«0628026.004\zone3ndsb 104 09/15/95
-------
/(MANAGED UNDER THE
UNDERGROUND STORAGE
TANK PROGRAM)
/!
AIRCRAFT
PARKING
APRON
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE 3 (GMZ-3)
HAVEN
WEIL
IT
D
I
QROUNOWATEM
RECHARGE
TREMCH
lŁQENO:
'-~ Unpawd read* and Ml*
BuiMngiwItilotaiornunbam
Surface
Uanhya
-__ QroundwatirManaaamaniZonaS
(OMZ.3) boundary
•^^ Qroundwiwi plumt - Arai wtth
•JP) aromatic hydrocartaara(AHCa)andtor
hatoganatad hydrocarbon (HHCa)
In younc»«l>r «bow MCL*
Edrtng graundmur (MracHon ml
EUsang gnundwitar •«r«ctkxi tanch
OraundiraUf •nracBcn «r*t*
QroundiMMr truunM plant
QroundwaKr raeha^a nncfi
andlowdlmcllan-
tractiiwnl ptent Mtuvrfl
Zon»3
Sttg* *. Rtcort at OacWon
PMS* Air Fan* B*M, NMT Hmpthlm
FIGURE 14
COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM FOR
SELECTED REMEDY
-------
XI. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
The remedial action selected for implementation in Zone 3 is consistent with CERCLA and,
to the extent practicable, the NCR The selected remedy is protective of human health and
the environment, attains ARARs, and is cost effective. The selected remedy also satisfies
the statutory preference for treatment that permanently and significantly reduces the TMV
of hazardous substances as a principal element. Additionally, the selected remedy will use
alternate treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum extent
practicable.
A. The Selected Remedy is Protective of Human Health and the Environment
The remedy at this zone will permanently reduce the risks posed to human health and the
environment by eliminating, reducing, or controlling exposures to human and environmental
receptors through treatment, engineering controls, and institutional controls. Specifically the
selected remedy will include:
• Excavation and off-base disposal of RCRA and non-RCRA soil from Zone
3, thereby eliminating leaching of contaminants from soils to groundwater.
• Excavation and off-base disposal of sediments from the drainage ditches in
Zone 3, thereby reducing receptor exposure to the sediments and preventing
any possible desorption from the sediments to surface water.
• Groundwater extraction to control the migration of the dissolved contaminant
plumes in Zone 3, and groundwater extraction to provide containment and
contaminant mass removal for several source areas within Zone 3.
• Institutional controls which would prevent exposure to contaminated
- groundwater, including (i) establishment of a GMZ; (ii) land use restrictions
on groundwater use within Zone 3; and (iii) deed restrictions prohibiting
certain construction activities in source areas within Zone 3.
MKm\RPT:OOG8026.004\zooe3rod.sb 107 09/15/95
-------
B. The Selected Remedy Attains ARARs
This remedy will attain federal and more stringent state ARARs. The following list
summarizes the major ARARs that are either applicable or relevant and appropriate to the
remedy selected for Zone 3:
Chemical-Specific ARARs
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) (Maximum Contaminant Levels and
Maximum Contaminant Level Goals).
State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 410.03, 410.04, and
410.05 — Groundwater Protection Standards.
State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 315-318 — Primary
Drinking Water Standards.
State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 432 — Surface Water
Quality Regulations.
Location-Specific ARARs
• Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act.
• Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA).
• Executive Order 11990 (40 CFR 6, Appendix A) - Protection of Wetlands.
• CWA, Section 404 (40 CFR 230 and 30 CFR 320 through 330) - Prohibition
of Wetlands Filling.
• State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 415 — Prevention of
Pollution from Dredging, Filling, etc., near Surface Water.
• State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 300, 400, and 600 —
Criteria and Conditions for Fill and Dredging in Wetlands.
• State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 378 — Community
Public Water Systems.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rodJb 108 09/15/95
-------
Action-Specific ARARs
• RCRA Subpart F (Corrective Action).
• SDWA, Underground Injection Program.
• State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Wm 100-1000—Hazardous
Waste Management Act and Rules.
• State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 410.07, 410.10(c),
410.26, 41030, and 410.31 — Groundwater Protection Standards.
Clean Air Act (NESHAPs).
RCRA Subparts AA, BB, and CC (Air Emission Standards for
Pollution Control Equipment).
State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-A1300—Toxic Air
Pollution Regulations.
The basewide ARARs document (G-614) lists all ARARs identified for Pease AFB and
provides a detailed discussion of the ARARs. Table 36 provides a complete list of the
ARARs and criteria to be considered (TBCs) for the selected remedy, including regulatory
citations, requirement synopses, actions to be taken to attain the requirements, and
determinations as to whether the requirement is applicable, relevant and appropriate, or to
be considered.
In addition to compliance with the aforementioned ARARs, which apply to on-site activities
only, the Air Force will conduct all off-site activities, including disposal of soil, sediment,
and treatment residues, in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
C Hie Selected Remedial Action is Cost Effective
The Air Force considers the selected remedy to be cost effective (i.e., the remedy affords
overall effectiveness proportional to its costs). The overall effectiveness of each identified
alternative was evaluated by assessing the relevant three criteria: long-term effectiveness and
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3ro
-------
permanence; reduction in TMV through treatment; and short-term effectiveness.
Effectiveness was then compared to the cost of each alternative.
The summary of the costs of the remedial alternatives follows. All costs are presented in
net present-worth dollars.
Remedial Alternative
1. No action (always considered, as required by
CERCLA).
2. Limited action/institutional controls/land use
restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
3A. Asphalt cap over soil and excavation of sediment with
off-base disposal; GMZ maintenance through
groundwater collection and intrazonal treatment using
greensand filtration, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption at two treatment facilities; subsurface
groundwater recharge; and land use restrictions on the
Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
3B. Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal;
GMZ maintenance through groundwater collection
and intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air
stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment
facilities; subsurface groundwater recharge; and land
use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
4. Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal;
source area groundwater collection and intrazonal
treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption at two treatment facilities;
subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use
restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
5. Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal;
GMZ maintenance with additional contaminant
removal through groundwater collection and intrazonal
treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption at a single treatment facility,
subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use
restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
Capital Cost
$27,300
$174,400
$6,827,600
$6,662,100
$1,683,900
$2^69,900
30-Year
Present
Worth
O&M Cost
$356,100
$1,449,100
$8,877,800
$7,641,000
$5,299,500
$10,511,500
Total
Present-
Worth Cost
$383,400
$1,623^00
$15,705,400
$14303,100
$6,983,400
$12,881,400
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.sb
110
09/15/95
-------
Remedial Alternative
Capital Cost
30-Ye
Worth
O&MCost
Total
Praeat'
Worth Cost
Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base
treatment and/or disposal; source area and GMZ
maintenance through groundwater collection and
intrazonal treatment \isinŁ greensand filtration, air
stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment
facilities; subsurface groundwater recharge; and land
use restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future
residential use.
$7,126,200
$7,955,900
$15,082,100
The selected remedy is the most effective alternative because it provides a high degree of
effectiveness and permanence, achieves a substantial reduction in TMV of contaminants,
offers flexibility in operations, and would have few short-term impacts. While the selected
remedy is the second most expensive alternative evaluated, the cost is proportionate to the
high degree of effectiveness that it affords.
A summary of costs for key elements of the selected Zone 3 remedy follows. All costs are
net present worth.
Component of Remedy
Deed Restrictions
Soil Excavation and Disposal
Sediment Excavation and Disposal
New Recovery and Monitor Wells
Groundwater Extraction and Collection
Upgrades to Existing GWTPs
Groundwater Recharge System
Groundwater Treatment Plant
Replacement
Miscellaneous
O&M
Total
Present Worth (S)
Not Costed
78,161
27,094
19,500
612^00
396360
236310
$ 3,684,199
$ 2,072342
S 7,955,931
$15,082,100
(Rounded)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3to
-------
O&M includes groundwater monitoring, groundwater treatment plant O&M, maintenance
on the recharge system, and 5-year SARA reviews intended to review the status and
progress of the remedial action. Miscellaneous includes mobilization, demobilization,
engineering, procurement, administrative and legal costs, contingency costs, and health and
safety costs.
D. The Selected Remedy Utilizes Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment or
Resource Recovery Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable
The Air Force evaluated the alternatives to determine which provides the best balance of
trade-offs among alternatives in terms of: 1) long-term effectiveness and permanence; 2)
reduction of TMV through treatment; 3) short-term effectiveness; 4) implementability; and
5) cost. The balancing test emphasized long-term effectiveness and permanence and the
reduction of TMV through treatment, and considered the preference for treatment as a
principal element, the bias against off-site land disposal of untreated waste, and community
and state acceptance. Of the alternatives evaluated, the selected remedy provides the most
favorable balance of the factors considered.
The selected remedy provides substantial TMV reduction through treatment. As described
previously, the selected remedy offers the greatest flexibility and ease of implementation
over both the short and long terms because two GWTPs would be used. Moreover, the
selected remedy, through treatment of source area and migrating groundwater, meets the
statutory requirement to utilize permanent solutions and treatment technologies to the
maximum extent practicable for groundwater.
E. The Selected Remedy Satisfies the Preference for Treatment Which Permanently and
Significantly Reduces the Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume of the Hazardous Substances
as a Principal Element
The principal elements of the Zone 3 remedial alternative are the removal of source area
soil, the management of groundwater contaminant migration, and containment of source
area groundwater. Together, all these elements address the primary threats at the various
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3itxtsb 112 09/15/95
-------
Zone 3 sites by reducing contaminant mobility, namely, leaching of soil contaminants to
groundwater, and migration of groundwater contamination outside the zone.
However, reduction of toxicity and volume of contaminants also is a principal part of the
selected remedy. Groundwater extracted at source areas and during management of
migration will be treated to meet cleanup goals before discharge. Moreover, if soils and
sediments are determined to be hazardous upon excavation, they will be sent for treatment
to a licensed TSD facility.
MK01\RPTK»628026.004\zont3ro
-------
XII. DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
The Draft Final Zone 3 FS Report (G-628) was submitted in November 1993. In May 1995,
a Supplement to the Draft Final Zone 3 FS (G-747) was prepared as a link between the FS
and the Proposed Plan, which reflected changes in the remedial alternatives since 1993. No
changes to the Zone 3 selected remedy have occurred since the issuance of the Zone 3
Proposed Plan (G-728).
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\rone3»dJb 114 09/15/95
-------
XIII. STATE ROLE
NHDES has reviewed the various alternatives and has indicated its support for the selected
remedy. NHDES also has reviewed the Zone 3 RI, FS, and FS Supplement Reports,
including the Risk Assessment, to determine if the selected remedy is in compliance with
applicable or relevant and appropriate state environmental laws and regulations. NHDES
concurs with the selected remedy for Zone 3. A copy of the Declaration of Concurrence
is attached as Appendix B.
MKOI\RPT:00628026.004\zone3KXt«b 115 09/15/95
-------
REFERENCES
G-84 CH2MHill. 1984. Installation Restoration Program Records Search for Pease AFB,
NH.
G-189 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund —Volume I. Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part A. Interim Final.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/1-89/002.
G-217 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1991. Meeting among U.S. Air
Force, Roy F. Weston, Inc., U.S. EPA Region I, and the State of New Hampshire.
EPA Region I, Boston, MA. 10 September 1991.
G-310 ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc. 1992. Portsmouth Refuse-to-Energy Plant Site Inspection
Report, Pease AFB, NH. July 1992.
G-534 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1989. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3
Quality Assurance Project Plan, Pease AFB, NH.
G-535 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1989. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3
Work Plan, Pease AFB, NH.
G-563 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1991. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Sampling and Analysis Plan for Pease AFB, NH. January 1991. Draft Final.
G-564 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1991. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Work Plan for Pease AFB, NH. January 1991. Draft Final.
G-565 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1991. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Work Plan Addendum 1 for Pease AFB, NH. September 1991.
G-568 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1991. Protocols for Generation of Baseline Risk
Assessments for the Pease AFB Sites. Roy F. Weston, Inc., West Chester, PA. July
1991.
G-579 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program Stage 3C,
Jet Engine Test Cell — Site 34 Source Area Remedial Investigation. Pease AFB, NH.
November 1992, Draft Final.
G-583 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program Stage 3C,
Site 32/36 Source Area Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH. December 1992,
Draft Final.
G-596 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Work Plan Addendum Number 3. Pease AFB, NH. June 1992.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.ref R-l 09/15/95
-------
G-601 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Protocols for Generation of Basetine Risk
Assessments for Pease AFB, NH. February 1992.
G-614 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Basewide ARARs, Pease AFB, NH. January 1993.
G-628 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study Report, Pease AFB, NH. November 1993.
G-629 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Zone 3 Draft Final Remedial Investigation Report, Pease AFB, NH. September 1993.
&
G-648 TETC (The Earth Technology Corporation). 1993. Hangar 227 Treatability Test,
Final Report, Pease AFB, NH.
G-696 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1994. Installation Restoration Program, Technical
Memorandum • Addendum to the Ecological Risk Assessment for LF-4 and the PCDA.
Pease AFB, NH. August 1994.
G-728 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1994. Installation Restoration Program, Draft
Proposed Plan for Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH. January 1994.
G-742 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1995. Installation Restoration Program, Natural
Attenuation Modeling for Zones 2 and 3, Pease AFB, NH. May 1995.
G-747 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1995. Installation Restoration
Program, Supplement to the Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study. EPA Region I,
March 1995.
G-762 Krauskopf, K.B. 1979. Introduction to Geochemistry. McGraw-Hill.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxttef R-2 09/15/95
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS
1,1,1-TCA
AALs
AFB
AFCEE/ESB
AGQSs
AHCs
ARARs
AVGAS
BFSA
BRA
BTEX
CAA
CERCLA
CWA
DEQPPM
DOD
DOI
EDB
EPA
EqP
ER-L
ER-M
FFA
FS
ftMSL
ftBGS
GMZ
gpm
GPR
GT
GWTP
HAs
HHCs
HQ AFBCA
HSWA
IRP
ITPO
LF-1
LFTS
LNAPLs
LS
MAG
MCLGs
1,1,1-trichloroethane
Ambient Air Limits
Air Force Base
Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence/Base Closure Division
Ambient Groundwater Quality Standards
aromatic hydrocarbons
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
aviation gasoline
Bulk Fuel Storage Area
baseline risk assessment
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes
Clean Air Act
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
Clean Water Act
Defense Environmental Quality Program Policy Memorandum
Department of Defense
Department of the Interior
ethylene dibromide
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Equilibrium Partitioning Approach
biological effects range — low
biological effects range — median
Federal Facilities Agreement
Feasibility Study
feet above mean sea level
feet below ground surface
Groundwater Management Zone
gallons per minute
ground-penetrating radar
Glacial Till
groundwater treatment plant
Health Advisories
halogenated hydrocarbons
Headquarters Air Force Base Conversion Agency
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
Installation Restoration Program
Intensive Test Pit Operation
Landfill 1
Leaded Fuel Tank Sludge Disposal Area
light, nonaqueous-phase liquids
, Lower Sand
Military Airlift Group
Maximum Contaminant Level Goals
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.acr
Acr-1
09/15/95
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS
(Continued)
MCLs Maximum Contaminant Levels
MCS Marine Clay and Silt
MEK methyl ethyl ketone
MMS Munitions Maintenance Squadron
MOE Ontario Ministry of the Environment
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MRDDA Mclntyre Road Drum Disposal Area
MRSPA Mclntyre Road Sand Pit Area
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NCP * National Contingency Plan
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NHANG New Hampshire Air National Guard
NHDES New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
NOAA National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
NPL National Priorities List
O&G oil and grease
OEHL Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory
PA Preliminary Assessment
PA/SI Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation
PCE tetrachloroethene
PDA Pease Development Authority
PHTs phthalates
POI Point of Interest
ppmw parts per million by weight
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
RAB-TRC Restoration Advisory Board-Technical Review Committee
RAO Remedial Action Objective
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RfDs reference doses
RI Remedial Investigation
RI/FSs Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies
RME most reasonable maximally exposed individual
RO Remedial Objective
ROD Record of Decision
SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan
SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SCS Site Characterization Summary
SI Site Investigation
SVE soil vapor extraction
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds
TBC to be considered
TCE trichloroethene
TCFM trichlorofluoromethane
TDS total dissolved solids
MK01\RFTKX)628026.004\20iie3RMUcr
Acr-2
09/15/95
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS
(Continued)
TMV toxicity, mobility, or volume
TOC total organic carbon
TOX organic halogens
TPHs total petroleum hydrocarbons
TSDFs waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities
TSS total suspended solids
US Upper Sand
USAFOEHL U.S. Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
VOCs volatile organic compounds
VORTAC VHS Omni-Range Tactical Air Navigation unit
WQC Water Quality Criteria
XRF x-ray fluorescense
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.acT
Acr-3
09/15/95
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLES
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.fm 08/23/95
-------
Table
Investigation Report Summary
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Phase,
Stage, or
Program
NA
Phase 1
Phase II
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 3C
Stage 4
Report
Date
September 1982
January 1984
June 1984
August 1987
February 1988
August 1988
April 1989
July 1990
January 1991
January 1991
February 1991
July 1991
July 1991
September 1991
May 1992
June 1992
November 1992
December 1992
January 1991
September 1991
May 1992
May 1992
May 1992
January 1993
September 1993
Author
uses
CH2M Hill
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WUSTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WBSTOfJ
WESTON
WliSTON
WKSTON
WliSTON
Report Title
Trichloroelhylene in the Oroundwater Supply of Pease Air Force Base, Portsmouth, New
Hampshire, USGS, WR] Open File Report 80-557
Installation Restoration Program Records Search
Phase II — Problem Confirmation/Quantification Presurvey Report
Phase II — Problem Confirmation/Quantification Final Report
Interim Technical Report No. 1 for the Installation Restoration Program Stage 2
Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program Stage 2
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program Stage 2
Installation Restoration Program Stage 2 Draft Final Report
Soil Removal at IRP Site 34 — Informal Technical Information Report
Soil Removal at Site 32 — Informal Technical Information Report
Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Report
Site 34 Site Characterization Summary
Site 32/36 Site Characterization Summary
Stage 3C Health Assessment Report
Stage 3C Jet Engine Test Cell - Site 34 Source Area RI Report
Stage 3C Site 32/36 Source Area RI Report
Site 34 FS Report
Site 32/36 KS Report
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Work Plan
Installation Restoration Program, Slagc 4, Work Plan Addendum
Drainage Area Letter Report
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
Site Characterization Summary, Zone 3
Site 32/36 Exploratory Well Letter Report
Haven Well Pumping Test Letter Report for Pease AFB, Nil
'/fine 3 Remedial Investigation Report - Draft Final
Sites
Addressed
Basewide
15
15
15
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36
31, 32, 33, 34. 35, 36
- 31. 32, 33, 34, 35, 36
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 19, 21
34
32
36
34
32/36
31, 33, 35
34
32/36
34
32/36
33, 35, 31
36, 38
Basewide
Tone 3
32/36
Haven Well Area
Zonewide
MKOI\Rlrr:00628026.004\zonc3rod.apa
A-l
06/15/95
-------
Table I
Investigation Report Summary
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Phase.
Stage, or
Program
UST
UST
usr
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
UST
NA
UST
UST
UST
UST
Report
Dale
April 1993
November 1993
April 1994
May 1994
March 1995
March 199S
May 1991
August 1992
December 1992
March 1992
April 1992
June 1992
July 1992
July 1992
November 1992
1993
May 1993
July 1993
August 1993
August 1993
August 1993
September 1993
Author
WESTON
WBSTON
' WBSTON
WBSTON
WESTON
WESTON
NEET
ICF-KE
WESTON
TETC
ICF-KE
Fugro-
McOelland
ICF-KE
Tin-c
ICF-KE
TETC
WESTON
TETC
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WHSTON
Report Title
Mcylntyre Brook and Lower NewfieMs Ditch Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study Report
Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report, Addendum 1, Site 65, Site Investigation
Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report, Addendum 2, Site 73, Site Investigation
Revised Site 32 Technical Impracticability Evaluation
Zone 3 Recovery WeH Work Plan
Removal of 18 Underground Storage Tanks
Underground Storage Tank Site Investigation Report and Corrective Action Plan
Stage 2 Initial Site Characterization Studies Report
Draft Site Characterization Summary, Hangar 227 Complex
Draft Refuse-to-Energy Plant Site Inspection Report
Wetlands Delineation and Evaluation for Pease International Tradeport
Portsmouth Refuse-to-Energy Plant Site Inspection Report
Removal of Underground Storage Tank No. 227 and Oil/Water Separator Nos. 227 and 229
Product Recovery System Installation and Oil/Water Separator System Removal Report— Self
Help Site, Building 136
Hangar 227 Treatability Test Final Report
Phase II: Initial Site Characterization Studies Report
Building 213 Former Hazardous Materials Storage Area Initial Site Characterization Report
Phase I: UST Removal and Closure Report, Site 70: Base Exchange Gas Station, Building 33
Phase III: Site Investigation Report, Site 65: Aircraft Ground Equipment Facility, Building
213
Phase III: Site Investigation Report, Site 76: Refueling Vehicle Maintenance Facility,
Building 249
Phase 1: UST Removal and Closure Report, Site 71: Central Healing Plant Building 124
Sites
Addressed
19,20
Zonewide
65
73
32
Zonewide
65,70,72
81
73
33, 35, 36, 38, 39
42
Zone 3
42
33, 35, 39
81
39
9, 67, 68, 69, 73, 78, 79
65
70
65
76
71
MK01\RPT:00628026.0M\zone3rod.apa
A-2
06/15/95
-------
Table 1
Investigation Report Summary
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Phase,
Stage, or
Program
VST
UST
UST
Report
Date
January 1994
February 1994
April 1994
Author
WBSTON
WESTON
WESTON
Report Title
Phase 111: Site Investigation Report, Site 81: Self Help Store, Building 136
Phase III: Site Investigation Report, Site 72: Base Motor Pool
Phase HI: Supplemental Site Investigation/Closure Report, Site 65: Aircraft Ground
Equipment Facility, Building 213
Sites
Addressed
81
72
65
ICF-KE = ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
TCTC = The Earth Technology Corporation.
NliETT = New England Hnvironmenlal Technologies Corporation.
USOS = U.S. Geological Survey.
NA = Not applicable.
MKOI\RPT:00628026.004\zonc3rod.apa
A-3
06/15/95
-------
Table 2
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 31
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
i; Compounds
Maximum Detected
Concentration
(me/ke)
|j Volatile Oranics
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
, Benzene
Ethyl Benzene .
Toluene
0.004
0.001
0.031
1 Xyfenes (Total) 0.008
Sampling i
Location - Interval |
Sam^ole ID (ft BGS) 1
744-B002 2J-3.0
i 744-B001 0.0-0^
744-B001 0.0-OJ
744-B002 2.5-3.0
1 Hahgenated Hvdrocabons
Tetrachloroethvlene(PCE)
' Trichloroethvtene fTCE)
' Trichlorofluoromethane
0.001
0.140
0.003
745-B002 3.0-3^
744-B002 2^-3.0
744-BOOl! 0.0-0^
Oxygens ted Hydrocarbons \
: Diethylether 0.022
9011-S014' 10.0-12.0 i!
l Semivolatik Organics !
: Polynuclcar Aromatic Hydrocarbons
1 2-Methyinaphthalene
: Acenaphthene
Acenapthyiene
. Anthracene
0.051
1.6
03
5.5
Benzo(a) Anthracene 15.0
'•• Benzo(a)Pyrene 3.4
| Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 1 13.0
iBenzo(fcha)Pervlene 10.0
' BenzoOOFluoranthene
iChrysene
8.2
13.0
Dibenzofuran 0.510
i Dibenzofa JOAnthracene
4.9
Fluoranthene 33.0
! Fluorene ! 1 .5
1 Indeno(lZ3-c.d)Pvrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
9J
0.140
16.0
15.0
325-SOOl 0.0-2.0 !j
9011 -8013 2.0-3.0 |
9011-S013 2.0-3.0 !!
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0 !
9011-S013 2.0-3.0 ;i
9011-S013 2.0-3.0 !!
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
325-SOOl 0.0-2.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
9011-S013 2.0-3.0
Phthalates
Bistt-EthYlhexvl) Phtbalate -
0.170
323-S001 0.0-2.0 i
\Otber
!TPH 900
9011-S014I 10.0-12.0
\MetaJs
1 Aluminum
Arsenic
! Barium
!BervOium
1 Calcium
Chromium
i Cobalt
8370.0
14.1
493
0.5
822.0
11.5
6.9
322-S001 0.0-2.0 !
9011-S012 10.0-11.0 !
322-S001 0.0-2.0
322-S001 0.0-2.0 !
9011-S014 10.0-12.0 i
9011-S013 2.0-3.0 !
9011-S012 10.0-11.0 i
MK01\RPTA}628026.00«23rd t3.wk3
A-4
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 2
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 31
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Compounds
i Copper
Iron
Maximum Detected
Concentration
fmf/kf~>
15.8
14,600.0
Lead i 22.7
i Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
: Silicon
1,930.0
198.0
183
uoo.o
: Sodium ! 122.0
i Vanadium
11.6
1 Zinc i 30.7
Location -
Sample ID
9011-S012
9011-S012
322-S001
9011-S013
9011-S013
9011-S012
322-S001
9011-S014
322-S001
9011-S013
Sampling
Interval
ffiBGS^
10.0-11.0
10.0-11.0
0.0-2.0
2.0-3.0 i
2.0-3.0 1
10.0-11.0
0.0-2.0
10.0-12.0
0.0-2.0
2.0-3.0
Note: Analytical data included in this table have been evaluated according to EPA Region I
protocols. Data not evaluated accordingly were not included.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd i3.wk3
A-5
21-Aug-9J
-------
Table 3
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 33
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
|| Maximum Detected
•; ' Concentration
il CoflQpQuqds (me/kg')
}! Volatile Orjjanics
i| Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Toluene 0.004
Location -
Sample ID
751 -8005
! Sampling
Interval i
(ft BGS}
10.0-12.0
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Diethyfether 0.006
779-B005
10.0-12.0
Semivolatile Oreanks
!| Polynudear Aromatic Hydrocarbons ':
!Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluonnthene
Benzo(k)Fluonnthene
., Benz(a)Anthracene
I Chrvsene
1 Fluoranthrene
i' Phenanthene
0.028
0.170
0.039
0.110
0.120
0.160
0.033
Pyrene 0.110
326-SOOl! 0.0-2.0
750-B003
327-S001
779-B005
779-B005
750-B003
327-S001
327-S001
i 6.0-6.5
i 0.0-2.0
1 10.0-12.0
10-12
6.0-6.5
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
i Phenols \
: Pentachbrophenol \ 0.053
PhtbaJates
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate 0.096
'•• Bts(2-Ethylheryl) Phthalate
1.500
Diethvl Phthalate 0210
Di-N-Butvl Phthalate 0.130
330-S101
750-B003
330-S101
750-B003
331-S001
0.0-2.0
i;
6.0-6.5 ,j
0.0-2.0
6.0-65 i
Butylbenzytphthalate
Pesticides
l4,4'-DDT 0.110
!!4,4'-DDE 0.047
330-S001
330-S101
>•• Pofycblorinated Bipbenyis
, Aroclor-1254 0.160
Aroclor-1260 0330
331-S001
329-S001
Other
ji Carbon Disulfide 0.006
779-B001
0.0-2.0 1
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
Metals
: Aluminum _
Antimony
! Arsenic
1 Barium
i Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
I Magnesium
20,600.0
32.0
29.7
762
1.5
4JZ70.0
38.8
20.7
35.6
33,600.0
63.1'
8290.0
750-B004
779-B005
328-S001
750-B004
750-B004
751-B005B
328-S001
328-S001
SB943-0608
750-B004
328-S001
751-B005
8.0-9.0
10.0-12.0
0.0-2.0
8.0-9.0 i
8.0-9.0
10.0-12.0 1
0.0-2.0 1
0.0-2.0
6.0-8.0
8.0-9.0 i
0.0-2.0
10.0-12.0
MK01\RPT:00628026.004z3rd t4.wfc3
A-6
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 3
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 33
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
I
1
Compounds
Manganese
II Mercury
''Nickel
Potassium
Silicon
i Sodium
' Thallium
; Vanadium
'Zinc
Maximum Detected
Concentration
Crag/kg)
576.0
0.53
50.0
6.910.0
3,750.0
484.0
38.9
52.1
106.0
Location -
Sample ID
779-B005
751-B005B
328-S001
750-B004
328-S001
SB945-0002
779-B005
779- BOOS
329-S001
Sampling
Interval j
fft BGS1 !
10.0-12.0
10.0-12.0
0.0-2.0
8.0-9.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
10.0-12.0
10.0-12.0
10.0- 12.0
Note: Analytical data included in this table have been evaluated according to EPA Region I protocols.
Data not evaluated accordingly were not included.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd_t4.wk3
A-7
21-AUE-95
-------
Table 4
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 35
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
i!
!' C-(?irpnnndf
Maximum Detected j
Concentration !
(me/kg) 1
Location -
SanrolelD
Sampling :
Interval •'
(tl EGS) i>
1 Volatile Oreanics I
! Aromatic Hydrocarbons
I Etbvl Benzene
i! Toluene
0550
1.093
Xvlenes (Total) 3.000
757-B003
SB934-0608
757-B003
65-7.0
6.0-8.0
65-7.0
j Hatogeaated Hydrocarbons \
'I TetrachloroethvlenefPCE)
!> Trichtorofluorome thane
0.084
0.002
SB932-0810
759-B001
8.0-10.0
1.0-15
i Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
II Acetone
jl Diethvkther
H2-Butanone(MEK)
0.031
0.004
4.600
7725-B004
782-B001
782-B104
2.0-4.0
0.0-2.0
75-95
1 SemfvolatOe OrBtnks
i Polvnuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
• 2-Methvlnaphthalene
; Acenaphthene
0.460
0.095
i Anthracene : 0.130
BenzDftOPvrene 0510
ii Benzo(b)Fluoranthene ' 0550
BenzofzJuflPervtene 0370
SB934-0608
332-S001
332-S001
332-S001
758-B004
334-S001
BenzDOrtFluoranthene 0510 332-S001
|| Benzo(a)Anthracene
ilChrysene
'. Dibenzo(aJi)Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indenoa^3-c,d)Pyrene
Phenanthrene
0550 758-B004
0.700 758-B004
0.110 332-S001
1.100
0.070
332-S001
332-S001
0370 i 334-S001
0.660
Pyrene 0.920
332-S001
758-B004
6.0-8.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
9.0-95 !
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0 !
9.0-95
9.0-9.5
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0 1
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
9.0-95
PbthaJates
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate 0.370
Bis(2-Ethvihexyn Phthalate i 2.000
Diethvl Phthalate
Di-N-Butvi Phthalate
0.130
0.190
334-S001
332-S001
759-B003
334-S001
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
6.0-65
0.0-2.0
! Nitrogeoated SemrmlatOes
N-Nitrosodiphenvlainine 0.070
332-S001
0.0-2.0
Pesticides
i4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
i4,4'-DDT
Dieldrin
0.003
0.005
0.005
0.014
0.003
SB934-0608
782-B101
334-S001
782-B101
782-B001
6.0-8.0
0.0-2.0 i
0.0-2.0 |
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
PofycnhrinatedBiphenyk
Arodor-1254 0.0771 334-S001
0.0-2.0
MK01\RPT:0062a026.00«z3rd t5a.wk3
A-8
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 4
Summary Of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sampling Results — Site 35
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Metals
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
:| Chromium
1 Cobalt
1 Copper
i Iron
iLead
: Magnesium
Manganese
! Mercury
! Molybdenum
i Nickel
Potassium
Silicon
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum Detected
Concentrations
(mg/kgl
16,900.0
37.0
84.9
59.8
1.3
33.9
1.6
2,732.0
134.0
13.7
50.3
31,000.0
227.0
10,323.0
895.0
0.2,
6.4
43.9 !
4,910.0
1,580.0
618.0 i
41.9
51.8
89.2;
Location -
Samnle ID
782-B005
782-B005
7725-B006
. 782-B005
782-B005
7725-B006
SB932-0002
S935-B008
SB918-0002
782-B005
SB918-0002
782-B005
SB932-0002
SB935-0608
SB918-0002
SB934-0002
SB932-0810
SB918-0002
782-B005
335-S001
SB932-0406
782-B005
782-B005
782-B005
Sample
Interval
(ft. BGS)
10.0-12.0 i
10.0-12.0 i
4.0-6.0 i
10.0-12.0 !
10.0-12.0 i
4.0-6.0 i
0.0-2.0 !
6.0-8.0
0.0-2.0
10.0-12.0
0.0-2.0
10.0-12.0
0.0-2.0 |
6.0-8.0 1
0.0-2.0 !
0.0-2.0 :!
8.0-10.0 i!
0.0-2.0 '••;
10.0-12.0 i
0.0-2.0 !
4.0-6.0 .1
10.0-12.0 j
10.0-12.0 j
10.0-12.0 ;.
Note: Analytical data included in this table have been evaluated according to EPA Region I protocols.
Data not evaluated accordingly were not included.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd_l5b.wk3
A-9
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 5
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of .Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 38
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Compounds
Maximum Detected J
Concentration
(tnefke) 1
Sampling
Location - Interval
Sample ID ( ft BOS')
Volatile Oreanics
I Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Toluene
0.004
SB919-0406 ! 4.0-6.0
Semivolatile Oreanics |
: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons i
2-Methylnaphthalene
! Acenaphthene
.1 Anthracene
F Benzo(a)Pvrene
, Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
' Benzo(jt,h,i)Perylene
; BenzoflOFluoranthenc
Benz(a)Anthracene
, Chrysene
' Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
Fluoranthene
! Fluorene
Indeno(l,23-c,d)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthreoe
'Pyrene
0.88 SB950-0002
4.40
SB950-0002
5.60 SB950-0002
6.00 SB950-0002
730 SB950-0002
1.10
0.26
8.40
730
1.10
SB950-0002
7451-B003
SB950-0002
SB950-0002
SB950-0002
16.80 SB950-0002
220 SB950-0002
1.60 ! SB950-0002
0.0-2.0 j
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0 !
0.0-2.0 i
0.0-2.0 1
0.0-2.0
1.0-3.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
0.77 SB950-0002 0.0-2.0
15.80
12.00
SB950-0002
SB950-0002
0.0-2.0 j
0.0-2.0
Phenols
Phenol (Acid Fraction)
120 7452-B003
1.0-3.0
Pbthalates
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
0.24
13.70
032
7450-B007
SB950-0608
SB948-0002
5.0-7.0
6.0-8.0
0.0-2.0
Polychloriaated Bipbenyis I
Arodor-1254 0.0641 7450-B007
5.0-7.0
Metals
Aluminum
: Arsenic
'Barium
•Beryllium ~
("?<%""?"
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
30,184.0 SB952-0608
46.2 SB951-0608
98.9 , SB952-0608
IS i SB952-0608
0.94 j SB919-0608
3337.0 SB919-0810
64.1
135
415
Iron 38.928.0
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
423
9.006.0
864.0
0.15
SB950-0002
SB952-0608
SB953-0204
SB95 1-0204
SB953-0406
SB952-0608
SB951-0204
7451-B009
6.0-8.0 !
6.0-8.0 !
6.0-8.0
6.0-8.0 !
6.0-8.0
8.0-10.0
0.0-2.0
6.0-8.0
2.0-4.0
2.0-4.0
4.0-6.0
6.0-8.0
2.0-4.0
7.0-9.0 i
MK01\RPT.O0628026.00»z3rd_t6.wk3
A-10
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 5
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 38
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Compounds
Nickel
Potassium
Silicon
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
I Zinc
Maximum Detected
Concentration
(mgJks)
43.8
9,006.0
502.0
809.0
30.3
583
85.0
Location -
Sample ID
SB950-0608
SB952-0608
7452- B005
SB952-0608
SB952-0608
SB952-0608
SB952-0608
Sampling jj
Interval |
Cft BGS1 II
6.0-8.0 ij
6.0-8.0 p
3.0-5.0 it
6.0-8.0 l|
6.0-8.0 li
6.0-8.0 i
6.0-8.0 i:
Note: Analytical data included in this table have been evaluated according to EPA Region I protocols.
Data not evaluated accordingly were not included.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd_t6.wk3
A-ll
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 6
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 39
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Compounds
Volatile Orpmks
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Ethyl Benzene
Toluene
Xvtenes (Total)
Hahgenated Hydrocarbons
Total- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichtoroethylene (TCE)
Semivolatile Organic;
Maximum Detected j
Concentration i
Cmg/k^ i
0.004!
0.016 i
0.011 i
0.008;
0.080 !
i Sampling
Location - Interval i
Sample ID (ft BGS}
SB917-0608 6.0-8.0 |
SB917-0608 6.0-8.0
SB917-0608 6.0-8.0
7726-B113 11.0-13.0
7726-B113 11.0-13.0
Potynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
i Ben2o(b)Fluoranthene
; Benzofeh,i)Peryiene
'i Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benz(a)Anthracene
jChrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
j Fluoranthene
Fluorene
1 Indenofl A3-c,d)Pyrene
Phenanthrene
1.7
3.7
SB912-0406
SB912-0406
11.8 SB912-0406
16.7
1.8
0.65
8.4
6.5
0.45
20.1
1.8
0.68
15.6
Pyrene 6.0
SB912-0406
SB912-0406
3041-S002
SB912-0406
SB912-0406
3042-S002
SB912-0406
SB912-0406
SB912-0406
4.0-6.0
4.0-6.0
4.0-6.0
4.0-6.0
4.0-6.0
0.0-2.0 i
4.0-6.0
4.0-6.0 ;
0.0-2.0
4.0-6.0
4.0-6.0
4.0-6.0
SB912-0406 . 4.0-6.0
SB912-0406
4.0-6.0
Pbthalates •
Bistf-Ethylhexvl) Phthalate
'' Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
42
0.8
i Nitrogenated Scmivolatiks
3,3'-Dichk>robenzidine .
0.8
SB941-0002! 0.0-2.0
SB941-0002
0.0-2.0
SB941 -00021 0.0-2.0
Pesticides
Endrin Aldehyde
0.003
SB936-0204
2.0-4.0
Metals
I Aluminum
Antimony —
Arsenic
'Barium
• Beryllium
i Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
dironuuiD
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
22,715.0
24.8
35.9
977.0
13
44.9
22
3418.0
113.0
22.8
111.0
35.215.0
WP5-0204j
3042-S002
WP5-0204
3042-S002
WP5-0204
2.0-4.0
0.0-2.0
2.0-4.0
0.0-2.0
2.0-4.0
3042-S002I 0.0-2.0
WP3-0002 ! 0.0-2.0
WP3-0002
WP3-0002
0.0-2.0
0.0-2.0
WP5-0204 2.0-4.0
SB913-0406
WP5-0204
4.0-6.0
2.0-4.0 1
MK01\RIT006M026.00«x3rd_t7.wk3
A-12
21-Aug-W
-------
Table 6
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds and Metals
Soil Sample Results — Site 39
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Comnounds
jLead
1 Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
! Potassium
Silicon
Maximum Detected
Concentration
fme/kcl •
1,130.0
8,038.0
815.0
0.13
5.0
46.9
5,524.0
400.0
Location -
Sample ID
. WP3-0002
WP5-0204
WP5-B004
SB936-0002
WP3-0002
WP5-0204
WP5-0204
7726-B013
Sampling
Interval j
fftBGSI I
0.0-2.0 :
2.0-4.0 '
2.0-4.0 !
0.0-2.0 '!
0.0-2.0 .!
2.0-4.0 :;
2.0-4.0 ;
11.0-13.0 |!
I! Sodium
833.01
WP3-0002
0.0-2.0
l: Thallium
16.11
WP3-0002
0.0-2.0
II Vanadium
130.0 I
WP3-00021
0.0-2.0
I; Zinc
245.0 I
WP3-0002 i
0.0-2.0
Note: Analytical data included in this table have been evaluated according to EPA Region I protocols.
Data not evaluated accordingly were not included.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd_t7.wk3
A-13
21-AU2-95
-------
Table 7
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds
Composite Groundwater Sample Results — Site 32 & 36
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
,(
; Oronjc Ojujmniinrk
! Volatile Or; tanks
I, Aromatic P. ydrocarbons
II 1,2— Dichlorobenzene
:i 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ilU-Xvlene
| 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 1,2,4-Trimethvlbenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
13,5 - Trimethylbenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
4-Isopropvltohiene
Benzene
!! Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Isopropvlbenzene
2,4-Dimethvtehend
, m,p-Xylene (Sum Of Isomers)
i n - Propylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
ten - Butvlbenzene
< Toluene
Hafagenated Hydrocarbons
i. 1,1-Dichloroethene
j1 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Chloromethane
> cis - l,2-Dichk>roethene
Toul- 12- Didiloroetheae
trans- 1,2- Dichloroethene
i Dichiorodifluoromethane
! Tetrachloroethytene(TCŁ)
Tricntoroetliylene fTCE)
Trichlorofluorometbane
; 1,1-Dichloroethane
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
BenzoicAdd
. Semivolatik Ornnks
Potynudear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
2-Methvlnaphthalene
Acenaphthene —
Naphthalene
! Phenols
!4-Methviphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Phthalates
\ Bisf2-Ethvlhexvl) Phthalate
i Dimethyl Phtbakte
Di-N-Butv! Phthalate
Maximum Detected
Concentration
(uz/L)
4.0
0.6
6.0
0.1
14.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
3.0
0.2
19.0
UOO.O
3.0
1.0
54.0
6.0
2.0
3.0
0.2
7.0
20.0
0.9
300.0
11.000.0
13,000.0
130.0
0.6
50.0
680,000.0
6.0
4.600.0
5.0
12.0
8.0
13.0
5.0
3.0
430.0
20.0
32.0
Location - |
Sample jp
i
i
572-M003
554-M004
554-M004
633-M003
5025-M002
6012-M001
554-M004
5025-M002
554-M004
633-M003
554-M004
5024-M001
554-M004
5025-M002
554-^004
554-WI004
5025-M002 I
5025-M002 !
633-M003
554-M004
548-M003
7531 -MOOS
5025-M001
5025-M002
548-M003
573-M002 !
5077-M001
6012-M002
5024-M002
6027-M001
5025-M002
5024- MOO 1
5025-M001
6042-M001 1
548-M001 1
5024-M001 j
5024-M001 j
554-M102 !
6031-M001 i
616-M002
Note: Analytical data included in this table have been evaluated according to EPA Region I protocols.
Data not evaluated accordingly were not included.
MK01\RPTKX)62S026.00«z3rd t8.wk3
A-14
23-Aug-95
-------
Table 8
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds
Composite Groundwater Sample Results — Sites 34 and 39
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Organic Compounds
Volatile Organic;
|j Aromatic Hydrocabons
12 - Dichlorobenzene
U-Xvlene
1,2,3— Trichlorobenzene
; 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4 - Trimethvlbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethvlbenzene
! 2- Chloro toluene
4 - Isopropyltoluene
[Benzene i
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Isopropylbenzene
• m,p-Xylene (Sum Of Isomers)
n-Butylbenzene
;n— Propvlbenzene ;
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Toluene i
Xvlenes (Total) i
Halogeaated Hydrocarbons
1,1-Dichloroethane i
1,1,1 -Trichloroe thane i
Chloroform i
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene !
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene !
Total- 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans - 1,3 - Dichloropropene i
Tetrachloroethylene !
Trichloroethylene ;
Trichlorofluoromethane 1
Vinyl Chloride
Vinylidene Chloride i
Oxyeena ted Hydrocarbons
Benzoic Acid
Semivolatile Organics
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene ;
Fluorene :
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Maximum Detected
Concentration
Cue/L)
0.2
140.0
1.0
2.0
590.0
140.0
0.9
24.0
1.100.0
12.0
800.0
80.0
1,800.0
40.0
100.0
0.1
17.0
3.0
20.0
130.0
9.0
33
73
2,700.0
60.0
3.1
5.8
0.4
510.0
02
8.0
21.7
3.0 i
43.0
1.0
2.0
330.0
2.0
Location -
Sample ID
635-M003
6041-M001
635-M003
6058-M003
6041-M101 I
6041 -M001 !i
MW18S-M001
617-M004
617-M001
MWE2D-M002
617-M004
617-M004
6041-M001
617-M004
617-M004 !
635-M003 ''
617-M004
617-M004 ;
6041 -M001
617-M001
i
MWE2D-M002
MWR4D-M001
MWR4D-M001
MWE2D-M002
MWE2D-MOQ2 |
553-M001
553-M009 i
5029-M001
7488-M102 '\
5021 -M001 i:
7488-M102 !
MWR3D-M001
;i
634-M001 'I
I
6041 -M001
617-M001 !
617-M001 ]
6041-M001
617-M004
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd t9.wk3
A-15
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 8
Summary Of Highest Concentrations Of Organic Compounds
Composite Groundwater Sample Results — Sites 34 and 39
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
1 Organic Compounds
Maximum Detected
Concentration
(ue/U
. Location - ;
Samole ID
i Semivolatile Oreanics (continued)
Phenols
! 2-Methylphenol (o-Gresol)
2,4-Dimethvtohenol
Pentachtorophenol
Phenol (Acid Fraction)
2.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
617-M002
617-M002
604 1- MOO 1
i
617-M002
Phthabtes
B»(2-EthvlhexvD Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
! Di-n-Butyl Phthalate
Di-n-Octvl Phthalate
i
720.0 617-M001 !
12.0
3.0
11.0
6018-M002
1
617-M001
MW1S-M003
Pesticides
BetaBHC
0.03 553-M001
Note: Analytical data included in this table have been evaluated according to EPA Region I protocols.
Data not evaluated accordingly were not included.
MK01\RPT:0062«>26.00*i3rd t9.wk3
A-16
21-Aug-95
-------
Table 9
Conceptual Model Data Summary
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Site
Principal Source Area
Source Type
Dales Active
Location
Status
Free -product Present
Contaminant Type
Relative Mass Released
Groundwater
Concentrations
Detected - /ig/L
Degradation Products
Ground Surface Cover
Soil Type at Source
Top US
TopMCS
Top UyGT
Top Bedrock
Depth to Water Table
Flow Direction US
(HorizTVert.) LS/GT
SRR
DHR
Maximum Groundwaler
Plume Extent/Direction
Site 31
31
UST
1956-1991
lOflBGS
Removed
None
Solvents
Low
TCP. = 17
TCA = 13
None
Asphalt
Sandy
Surface
Absent
55 - 65 ft
17 ft
SB/Down
SE/nm
ESK/nm
Si-Aim
250 ft
SB to BSE
Site 32
32a
UST and Pipe
1956-1965
5-IOftBGS
Removed
Potential DNAPL
Solvents
HiRh
TCE = 680,000
DCE = 13,000
DCE. VC
Gravel, Grass
Silly, Clayey
Surface
5-8flBGS
30-40 ft BOS
3-6ftBGS
NNE/Down
Nil/Down
N or E/ nm
E/nm
1500ft
ENE
Site 33
33
O/W Separator
1964-1991
lOflBGS
Removed
None
Fuels/Solvents
Low
TCE= 13
DCE = 15
DCE
Grass, Concrete
Silly
Surface
5 -10 ft BOS
65-70 ft BOS
6-7flBGS
E to NE/Down
ESE/nm
SB/nm
SSE/nm
400ft
ENB
Site 34
34a
USTs
1970-1993
8-10ftBGS
Removed
None
Fuels
Mod
B = 1,100
X - 1,940
None
Grass
Sandy or Rock
Surface
Trace.SflBGS
7-10flBGS
3-5 fl BOS
E/Down
ENE/Down
E/Down
nm/nm
600ft
SE&NE
Site 35
35a
UST. O/W Sep.
1956-1991
8-10ftBGS
Removed
Yes
Fuels/Solvents
1.0W
DCE =9
TCE = 2
DCE
Asphalt
Silly
Surface
4-9ftBGS
32flBGS
4-6flBGS
E/Down
ESE/nm
ESE/nm
ESR/nm
500 ft
ENE
Site 36
36a
HMSA.Wash Rack
1956-1990
Ground Surface
Inactive
None
Fuels/Solvents
Mod
TCE = 790
DCE = 590
B= 19
DCE.VC
Asphalt, Grass
Silly, Gravelly
Surface
4-10flBGS
20-30flBGS
4-6flBGS
E/nm
ESE/Up&Down
SE/nm
ESE/nm
1500 fl
ENE
Site 38
38a
HMSA
--
Ground Surface
Inactive
None
Solvents
Low
TCE = 26
DCE = 76
DCE
Grass
Silly, Gravelly
Surface
6-10flBGS
24ftBGS
8-10ftBGS
E/nm
E/nm
SE/nm
ESE/nm
750 fl
ENB
Site 39
39a
HMSA,Wash Rack
1956- Present
Concrete Floor
Active
None
Fuels/Solvents
Low
TCE= 15
DCE = 100
DCE
Concrete
Sandy
Surface
13 fl BGS
42flBGS
6-7 fl BOS
E/Down
BSE/Down
BSE/Down
ESE/nm
500ft
BNB
MK01\RPT:00628(K6.004\7.3rd tlO.wkJ
A-17
23-Aug-95
-------
Table 9
Conceptual Model Data Summary
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Site
Princiml Source Area
Source Type
_ . ^.
Location
Suius
Free -product Present |
Contaminant Type
Relative Man Releated ' .
Groundwaler
ConceMrationi
Detected - /tg/L
Degradation Product!
Ground Surface Cover
Soil TVpe at Source
Top US
TopMCS
TopLS/GT
Top Bedrock
Depth to Water Table
Flow Direction US
(HorteVVen.) LS/OT
SDR
DBK
Maximum Groundwaler
Plume Ejlenl/Djrectjon
Site 39
39b
Surface Spill
HmbtuvmM
Ground Surface
NA
Potential DNAPL
Solvents
Hidi
TCE - 19W05
DCS - 291
DCE
Concrete, Grass
Clayey. Silly
Surface
10- 14 ft 80S
20 ft BOS
30 ft BGS
10- 14 fl BOS
S to SB/ Down
S to SB/ Down
SB to ESB/Down
S/nm
(400ft
StoWSW
Site 65
65b
USTs. O/W Sep.
1Q74 1OO1
8- 10 ft BGS
Removed
None
Fuels
Low
B = 20
None
Concrete, Grass
Sandy, Rock
Surface
Absent
Absent
3- 8 ft BOS
10- 14 fl BUS
ESE/nm
SE/nm
SI: to riSIV nm
S/nm
At Source Only
NA
Site 70
70
USTs
8-10flBGS
Removed
None
Fuels
Low
B = 58
T-2S2
E= 113
X>900
None
Asphalt
Sandy, Gravelly
Surface
Trace, 4 ft BGS
14 ft BGS
25 ft BGS
10- 14 ft BGS
SE/nm
SB to ESB/Down
SB to ESE/ nm
SSB/nm
-lOOfl
SE
Site 72
72
USTs
8 -10 ft BGS
Removed
Yes
Fuels
High
8 = 2,800
T= UOO
E = 830
X = 2,600
None
Asphalt
Sandy, Gravelly
Surface
Trace. 4 ft BGS
10- 12 ft BGS
40 ft BGS
10- 14 ft BGS
SE/ns
SB/Down
ESE/nm
SSB/nm
1500ft
SSE
Site 73
73
USTs
8- 10 ft BGS
Removed
None
Solvents
Moderate
DCE « 21^81
VC = 3,421
DCE.VC
Gravel, Grass
Sandy. Silly
Surface
Absent
Undifferenlialed
40 ft BGS
10- 14 ft BGS
sse/M
SEloS/Down
BSB/nm
S/nm
~300ft
SSW
Site 76
76
USTs
8- 10 ft BGS
Removed
Yes
Fuels
Low
B = 50
T-93
E = 107
X> 1,000
None
Grass
Sandy, Gravelly
Surface
Trace, 4 ft BGS
4 ft BGS
30 ft BGS
10- 14 ft BGS
SSEtoSSW/nm
S to SSE/ nm
ESE/nm
SSE/nm
~75 ft
SSW
Site 81
81
UST.O/WSep.
8- 10 ft BGS
Removed
Yes
Fuels/Solvents
Mod/High
B = 3516
T=8442
PCE - 751
TCP. = 129
TCE, DCE
Grass
Silly, Sandy
Surface
4 ft BGS
10- 14 ft BOS
50 ft BGS
10- 14 ft BGS
SEtoESE/ns
SE to BSE/Down
KS1V nm
S/nm
500ft
ESE
LEGEND: NA - Not Applicable
nm = no measurements
UST = Underground Storage Tank
BGS ** Below Ground Surface
HMSA - Hazardous Materials Storage Area
fl BGS = feet below ground surface
US = Upper Sand
US - Lower Sand
GT= Glacial Till
MCS = Marine Oay and Sill
DNAPL = Dense Non- aqueous Phase Liquid
TCB " Trichloroelhenc
DCB =• U-dichtoroelhene (total)
PCE = Telrachloroelnene
VC = Vinyl chloride
TCA- 1.1.1-Trichloroelhane
SBR- Shallow bedrock
DBK "Deep bedrock
Q/W Sep. - Oil/Water Separator
NAP - Napthalene
B = Benzene
T = Toluene
E = Elhylbenzcne
X = Xylcncs (total)
MK()l\RIT.00628026OO*z3rd H0.wfc3
A-18
23-Aug-95
-------
Table 10
Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and Total Metals
Surface Water Analytical Results
Upper Newfields Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Analyte
VOAs
Bromofonn
Chlorobenzene
Cis-1,2 dichloro-
cthenc
Trans-l,2-dichloroethene
Trichloroethytene
Vinyl chloride
BNAs
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-«thylhexyi)
phthalate
2-methylphenol
(o-cresol)
Metals
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Calcium
Cadmium
Chromium (TRI)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Maximum
Background
Concentration
<«/L)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(Ag/L)
ND
ND
ND
-------
Table 10
Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and Total Metals
Surface Water Analytical Results
Upper Newfields Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Analyte
Metals (continued) «
Molybdenum
Nickel
FotStVtunt
Silicon
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maxnnuni
Background
ND
NO
ND
55
31.7
ND
0.043
Regulatory
Guidance
Value*
NA
0.477*
NA
NA
NA
NA
0321m
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
0.242
0.411
6.85
39.1
58.8
0.501
235
Location ID
8066-W001
8066-W001
8066-W001
8139-W001
80S-W001
8066-W001
8066-W001
•New Hampthite Department of Environmental Services, Water Quality Criteria for Toxic.
Substances, Freshwater Chronic Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life.
"Adjusted for hardness of 370 mg/L CaCO,.
J • Estimated detected value.
ND - Not detected.
NA « No criteria value available.
MK01\RPTK»628026.004\i3rodJpt
A-20
09/11/95
-------
Table 11
Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and Metals
Sediment Analytical Results
Upper Newfields Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, New Hampshire
Anatyte
VOAs
1,2-dichloroethene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Diethylether
Toluene
Trichloroethytene
Vinyl Chloride
BNAs
Benzoic Acid
Benzo(a) Anthracene
Benzo(a) Pyrene
Benzo (b) Fluoranthene
Benzo(k) Fluoranthene
Bis( 2- ethythexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Butyl phthalate
Fluonnthene
Phenmthrene
Pyrene
ToulPAHs-
Pestirides/PCBs
Alpba-chlordane
DDT
DDD
DDE
Heptachlor Epoxide
Maximum
Background
Concentration
(«/kg)
ND
120
170
ND
7
24
ND
ND
(P8/kg)
720
610
640
600
600
750
820
ND
1400
1,100
1,600
8,900
045/kg)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Regulatory
Guidance
Value*
(PS/kg)
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Ag/kg)
NA
230
400
NA
NA
NA
. 400
NA
600
225
350
4,000
(«/kg>
0.5
1
2
2
NA
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
<«/kg)
310J
180J
560J
3J
27
26
130J
1.100J
(«/k«)
800J
100J
86J
1.400J
1.400J
190J
130J
2,600
1.600J
200J
970
5730
(W/kg)
9J
26,000
190
60J
5.8
Location ID
8139-D001
8139-D001
8139-D001
837-D001
8136-D001
804-D004
8045-D001
8045-D001
8139-D001
831-D002
831-D002
8045-D001
8045-D001
831-D002
831-D002
832-D002
8045-D001
8064-DOOl
8045-D001
8045-D001
8064-DOOl
80S-D001
831-D002
8045-D001
8137-D001
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodJpa
A-21
09/11/95
-------
Table 11
Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and Metals
Sediment Analytical Results
Upper Newfields Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, New Hampshire
(Continued)
Anatyte
iMUnkf
Aluminum
Anenic
Barium
Bezyflium
Boron
Cadmium
Cateum
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Mafnetium
Maafanete
Mercury
Nickel
Potatnum
Silicon
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Background
Concentration
(•I/I*
14,300
112
5iS
0X3
ND
ND
3430
53
14.4
232
21,900
4Z1
6,450
358
0.2
46.7
2340
4340
542
-ND
35.7
105
Regulatory
Guidance
Value-
(m|/kD
MA
33
NA
NA
NA
5
NA
80
NA
70
NA
35
NA
NA
0.15
30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
120
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(a*/kt)
14,900
441
526
4.6
121
12
14,700
97.4
103
55.6
87.900J
304
4980
1330
0.44
139J
4110
8340
762
28.6J
165
659
Location ID
8139-D001
8045-D001
8045-D001
8139-D001
8139-D001
804S-D001
8139-D001
8045-D001
8139-D001
804S-D001
8139-D001
8045-D001
832-D002
8139-D001
8139-D001
8139-D001
8066-D001
8139-D001
8139-D001
8064-D001
8045-D001
8139-D001
•NOAA ER-L Values
J » Fttimitml detected value.
ND > Not delected
NA • No value available
Mra\RFT:00628026.0M\z3«xUpa
A-22
09/11/95
-------
Table 12
Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and Total Metals
Surface Water Analytical Results
Upper Grafton Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Analyte
VOAs
Benzene
Ethyl benzene
Toluene
1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
1,3,5-trimethyi benzene
1,2-Xylene
M,P-Xytenes
Xylenes
BNAs
2-MethyI naphthalene
4-Methytphenol
Bis(2-etnyihexyl)
phthalate
Phenol (Acid
Fraction)
Metab
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Calcium
Copper
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Silicon —
Sodium
Zinc
Maximum
Background
Concentration
(«/L)
ND
ND
0.0008
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Otg/L)
ND
ND
ND
ND
(ng/L)
0.896
ND
ND
25.80
0.015
9.14
1.97
ND
55
31.7
0.043
Regulatory
Guidance
Value'
(Ag/L)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Ag/L)
NA
NA
3
2460
(mg/L)
0.087
NA
NA
NA
0.0091"
NA
NA
0.1218"
NA
NA
0.08186
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
-------
Table 13
Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and Metals
Sediment Analytical Results
Upper Grafton Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Analyte
VOAf
Acetone
2-Butuooe (MEK)
Dfetnytethcr
Toluene
•NAs
2-Methyl Naphthalene
Bi*( 2- ethylhejtyl) pbthaUte
Dt-N-Butyl Phmalate
Naphthalene
Total Petroleum
Pntkidts/rCBt
DOE
iMtvyta
Aluminum
Anenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cakipin
Chramium
Cobalt
Copper
Iran
Lead
Magnesium
Mantrae
Moray
Nickel
Maximum
Background
ConCCnttttiOfl
(«/•*>
170
120
7
24
(iC/k|)
220
750
ND
260
ND
(«/•*)
ND
(•t/ktf
14^00
122
52J
0^3
3430
53
-14^
232
21,900
42.1
6,450
358
02
46.7
Regulatoiy
Guidance
Value*
(M/k*)
NA
NA
. NA
NA
(tt/kf)
65
NA
NA
340
NA
Uv/kD
2
(•t/kD
NA
33
NA
NA
NA
80
NA
70
NA
35
NA
NA
0.15
30
NlVQaBUlB
Detected
Cooccntntion
On/kt)
170
14J
12J
9J
Om/kD
65,000
3501
3,900
38,000
40,000
(W/kf)
20J
(«t/kD
19.700J
48J
103
1.8
&\510
37J
23.1
353
26.700J
119
5410
1,120
0.45
443
Location ID
8063-D001
8063-D001
8063-D001
8043-D001
806-D103
806-D003
806-D002
806-D103
806-D003
8042-DOOl
8042-D001
8042-D001
8042-DOOl
8043-D001
8042-DOOl
8042-DOOl
8042-DOOl
8043.D001
8042-DOOl
8043-D001
8042-DOOl
8042-DOOl
806-D003
8043-D001
MK01\RFT:0062S026.004\z3nxUp*
A-24
09/11/95
-------
Table 13
Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics and Metals
Sediment Analytical Results
Upper Grafton Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Analyte
laoiganks (continued)
Selenium
Silicon
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Background
Concentration
Regulatory
Guidance
Value'
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
ND
4,840
35.7
105
NA
NA
NA
120
7.8
1,670
932
78.6
Location ID
8043-D001
8043-D001
8042-D001
806-D003
•NOAA ER-L Values.
J = Estimated detected value.
ND = Not detected.
NA = No value available.
MK01\RPT:0062S026.004\z3rod.apa
A-25
09/11/9S
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
: Soil
i Chemical
! Organic;
Site 31° Site 33
, 2 feet i 15 feet
2 feet
': Acetone !
Aroclor-1254
ArocloT-1260
Benzene '
Benzoicacid
! Benzyl alcohol
• Butt-etnythexvh phtbalate
x"
Bromofonn
2-Butanone
n-Butylbeozene '
see-Butylbenzene
i tert-Butytbenzene • '
" Butyl benzyl phtlulate
Carbon disulfide
< alpha- Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
i Chloroform
ij4.4'-DDD
[1 4.4'- DDE
I!4.4'-DDT
Dibenzofuran
X
1 15 feet0
Site 35"
2 feet
i
X
X
X
JT4
i X i X
! x i
1 1
!
X
X
i
X
, Ufeet
Site 38" | Site 39
2 feet ' 15 feet 2 feet ' 15 feet"
|
X i 1
1 • !
1
!
X
! 1 x
X
1 ! 1
i '• !
1 i
1 X
X
1
!
X
X
1 X
i X
x ' •
1.2-Dfchlorobeiizene ; i
U-Dichlorobenzene •
' 1.4-Dichlorobenzene ! !
33'-DichlorobenzidiiK
!
Diehlorodifluoromethane
i 1.1— Dichloroethane
1
i 1.2-Dichloroethane ;
: Dichloroethcnei (touD* • i
1 1.1-Dkhloroethene • i
I cis-l^-Dichloroethene
| trans-12-Oichloroelhene :
|| U- Dichloroethenes (total)' '
! Dieldrin
' Diethyl ether
Diethvl pfathalate
, 2.4-Oimethylphenol
X . X
X
j
Dimethyl phthalate
1 Di-n-butyt phthalate
; Endrin aldehyde
' Eihylbenzene
X
Hexachlorobuiadiene
IsoDropyl benzene
1 4- IsoproDVi toluene
Methyl chloride
Methvlene chloride
. 2-Meihytnaphthalene
X
2-Methylphenol
X
X
'! 4-Methylphenol 1
i Naphthalene
X X
n-NitroiodiDbenylamine ,
X
X
I"
x"
X
X
X
X ' X
-
X
1 . !
1
jfl
X"
X ! X 1
1
[
i
II
' : !
I . '
! i
!
i !
;!
X X
; (
i i
! ; ;
1,1 ; ;
i
X
X
x"
i
X
x"
X
i
j
x"
•I
if
1 x -:
1
1
PAHs
Acenaphthene !
Acenaphthylene i
Anthracene !
X
x"
X4
X
x"
X
X
X
X
!
i • X
X
X
! :
i
t i
i ;
i i>
1
X
1
x"
1
X
I*
x i x
x x x" x ;
MK01\RPTKW628026.004\z3rd 15a.wk3
A-26
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Soil
Site 31"
2 feet
15 feet
Site 33
Site 35*
2 feet ! 15 feet6 2 feet 1 15 feet
Site 38"
2 feet
15 feet
Site 39
2 feet 1 15 feet" '•
Organics f continued)
Benzofatanthracene
Bcmofalpvrene
Benzofblfluoranthene
BenzoCgJu'lperylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(aji)anthracene
X
X
X
x"
x"
X
X
Fluoranthene x
Fluorene x
Indeno(123-cd)pyrene x
• Phenanthrene : x
i Pyrcne
1 Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
x"
n-Propvlbenzene
Telrachloroethene
Toluene
1.2.3-Tricnlorobenzene
1 2 A - Trichlorobenzene
! 1.1.1-Trichloroethane
X
! Trichloroethene x
! Trichlorofluoromethane | x
1 12.4-Trimethvlbenzene '
: 1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene
: Vinvl chloride
i m.p-Xylenes (total)
! o-Xylene
Xylenes (total1)'
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x"
x"
x°
Xs
x"
x"
x"
x"
X"
x"
x"
x"
x"
x"
x" x"
x"
J?
1
1
!
1
X
X
x"
I*
x"
x"
x"
•f
X"
x"
X
X"
X
x"
! j
x"
x"
x"
Xs
x"
Xs
X*
X8
x"
X
X"
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
x"
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X I
X
X
X
X" X° li
X
X
X
Xs
X
X"
x 1!
X !i
x !
X
x" ii
x ;
X •
1 1 '
X
1
i
;
i
*
!
1
.
!j
i1
X i
:'
1 1
i I .
•
X
-
: ; ;;
1 1 i
i
1
Inorganics
'Aluminum .
i Antimony
| Arsenic
i Barium
i Beryllium
' Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
i Cobalt
Copper
ilron
.Lead
> Magnesium
' Manganese
: Mercury ~~
i Molvbdenum
1 Nickel
• Potassium
: Selenium
! Silicon
| Sodium
! Thallium
[Vanadium
!Zinc
x
x
X
x
x
X
*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X J
X
X
J
»
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
«p
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
*
X
X
X
x
X
X
•
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
i
x ;
X 1
X 1
:
,
X
x :
1
x !
X
X
x •••
X
i.
'
i
X
x •!
X
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd_l 5a.wk3
A-27
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
: . Groundwtter"
: Site 31
OB
Sites 32/36 Site 33 Site 34
BR OB 4 SB DB US LS A SB BR
Chei^tril Main Hot Spot Main i Hot Spot I Hot Spot II Main Hot Soot
Organic;
Acetone ' i ' 1
Aroctor-1254
iAroetor-1260
Benzene !
x
: i
• : . .
X X IX 1 X ' X X
IBeazoicacid > x . . : x
j Benzyl alcohol J
BBtt-ethyihewnphtbalate 1 ;
Bromofof nt
2-Buunooe
:, n-Butytbenzene j
' sec-Butyibeazene :
x
i i 1 ! 1 i
X X X 1 X X
, 1
' i i
X X
X X I X X X
tert-Butytbenzcne ! x x . x x
'! Butvl benzvt Dhtbalate ! '
: Carbon diiulfide : . • ' , •
alpoa-Chlordane ! !
1 .
Chlorobenzeae '. x x i x :
1 Chloroform : ! • '• •
4.4'-DDD ! '
4.4--DDE
4.4--DDT !
Oibenzofuran ' : :
. U-DKhlorobeiuene i ; j x x
i 1.3-Dichtorobeiuene : ' , x
i 1.4-Dichlorobenzeoe
• 3J'-Dkhlorobenziduie
1 Dichlorodifluorome inane
l.l-Dichloroethane x
; U-DicUoroetbue i
DfchloroetlMnes (tool)
! U-Dichtoroethene
cis-U-Dichloraeiheae ; x
trinj-12-Dichloroethene
; x
!
X ; : i
X : '
1
; ' '
: x x
X
U-Dichloroetbena r total/
X
Dieldrin
Dkthvl ether ! j
Diethvl phthalate
2.4-DimethvlDhenol
Dimethyl phthalale ;
I Di-a-bucyi phihaUte •
; Endrin aldehyde !
( Eibvtbenzene :
Hexachlorobuudienc :
i bopropyl benzene
1 4-Iiooroevl toluene ;
'Methyl chloride
iMethytene chloride •
X
X
i '-Methytniphthik ne ' !
2-MethylBlienol
4-Methytpheaol
Naphthalene
a-NiUTBodiphenvUniine |
X
X
X . X ' X X X X X
X X ' X X
i ;
X : i 1 • X
xx' 1 x ' x
x x x x 1 x ;
: '
! X ! X • X
' 1 : .
x : x x | x i x
! X ' • ' ( X
x i :
: i • i
x - ' i x
! X ,
: 'iii
x j j i : x
' 1 '
PAH.
Acenaphthene ' '
Acenaphihvlene
Anthracene ; :
XX : ; '
! ! : ! ' "
! ; ! ! i . '
MK01\RPT:006M026.00*z3rd
A-28
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Groundwater°
Site 31 Sites 32/36
OB BR
OB&SB
Main 1 Hot Spot
DB
Main
Site 33
US LS & SB
Hot Spot I Hot Spot II
Site 34
BR
Main Hot Soot
Organic: (continued)
Benzo(a)anibracene
BenzoCa)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
i Benzo(gJij)perylene
BenzoOOfluoranthene
Chrysene
j Dibenzo(aJi)amhracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
j Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene
:. Phenanthrene
i
j Pyrene
t
i Pentachlorophenol : ; ! !
Phenol
n-Propylbenzene x
Tetrachloroethene i x x x ;
I Toluene i
j 1.23-Trichlorobenzene
1 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
X X X i
; 1.1.1 -Trichloroethane x ,
j Trichloroethene x
Trichlorofluoromethane
I 1.2,4-Trimethylbenzene i
1 13.5-Trimethvlbenzene
Vinyl chloride
m.p-Xylenes (total)
o-Xylene i
x
: I
X
i
X
t
x !
x ; i
' X ' X X !
X
X ! X
x
x : x i
x ! x
ix : x .
X
X
• I x
Xylenes (total)' . ! i .' :
X
X
X
X
x
x
x
X
X
i
i
x
x
i
X X
X
X X
X X
1
X X
*
x 1
X
;
X i X
X . X
;
Inorganics
Aluminum . 1
Antimony i
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
| Boron i
Cadmium
Calcium , x
Chromium
Cobalt
i
Copper !
X
X
X :
!
X
1
! i
1
i i
i i
X i X : !
Iron ! i j x : x !
ILead '• , x .
j Magnesium ~~ ' I x i x ,
i Manganese i j x i
X
i Mercury • j , x . i
i Molybdenum !
i Nickel !
i Potassium ! x ' x x j
Selenium i . i
: Silicon
i Sodium x
X , X
X
x ! x i x i
Thallium i
X
I
!
X
|
1
1 X
1
.x x :
1
X
• 1
X '
X :
! 1
; X 1
X i '
.
!
! ;
X
X X
i
'Vanadium : > j i
Zinc ; : 1
X
X X
i
X >
X
X X
j
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd 15b.wk3
A-29
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
|i
1 Chemical
Groundwaterb
Sites 35/38/39 OB & SB
and Site 34 OB
' Main ' Hot Snot I ' Hot Soot II
Sites 35/38/39
DB
Sites 72^3/81 Haven
OB i BR ; Well
'< Main
i Hot Soot
Organic!
Acetone i
1 Arodor-1254 i
jArodor-1260
1 Benzene '
Benzoicacid
;', Benzyl alcohol
; Bii(2-ethyihexyn phtbalate
• Bromofonn .
2-Butanone
x
:; n-Butylbeniene '
sec-Butylbenzene
i tert-Butylbenzene
| Butyl benzyl phthalate
|| Carbon dfeulfide
II alpha- Chlordaiie
j Chlorobenzene
' Chloroform
4.4--DDD
. 4.4'- DDE
4.4--DDT
. Dibenzofuran
' 1.2-Dichlorobenzene
J, 13-Dkhlorobenzene
I' 1.4-Dichlorobenzene
j 3J'-DichlorobenzJdine
X
Dichlorodifluorofne thane
! l.l-Dichk>roe thane
; 1.2-Dichloroethane !
i, Oichloroethenes (total)
1.1-Dknloroeibene
cis-U-Dkhloroethene
X
X
:' ir»n«— 1.2— Dichloroethene < x
U-Oichloroethenei (total/
X 1 X
X
X
i
1
1
X
!
X
1
x ! x j
i
1
i
!
j
, i
X
1
J
!
i
1 * 1
! i
i X
'
'
X
I i
X ;
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1
Dieldrin
• Diethyl ether
Diethyl phthalate
2.4 - Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl phthalate
Di - n - butyl phthalate
Endrin aldehyde '
Eihyibenzene x
Hexachlorobuiadiene
Isopropyi benzene
4-Isoprotivi toluene : __
Methyl chloride
Methytene chloride
2-Methyluphtluuene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol '
Naphthalene
n - NitrosodiphenyUmine
X
X
;
X
i
x : x
X
X
X
X
i ! X
:
!
i i
jl
1
i
X
X
i 1
X
! i
X
i
!
X
X
X
i
! i
1
i X
• x
X
X
x 1
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Aeeaapbthylene
Anthracene
X
X
MK01\RPT:00628026.00«z3nl 15c.wk3
A-30
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Groundwater" 1
Sites 35/38/39 OB & SB
and Site 34 OB
Sites 35/38/39
DB
Main Hot Soot I Hot Spot II
Sites 72/73/81 ! Haven
OB
Main 1 Hot Soot
BR i Well
Organics (continued)
' Benzo(a)aiUhracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
: Benzo(b)fluoramhene
Benzo(gjij)peiylene
• Benzo(k)fluoramhene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(aJi)anihracene !
' Fluoranthene
i Fluorene i
I ndenqfl .23 - cd)pyrene
' Phenanthrene j
Pvrene
Pentachlorophenol i
Phenol
n-Propylbenzene
Telrachloroethene
Toluene
1
1
x
1 x
i
I i
x
X
i:
! !:
_t'
!
i
! i x
! ; x x !
1 • i x
x ! xx
. 1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene ! I
1 2.4 - Trichlorobenzene
1.1.1-Trichloroethane x |
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
1 .2.4 - Trimethvlbenzene
1 j.5-TrimethvIbenzene
Vinvl chloride
m.p-Xvlenes (total)
x i x
X
X
X
x
j
j' X 'X
i X X
1
X
o-Xvlene i x
Xvlenes (total)' j
X
1
x
x
x
X
X
'
x ;
X
X ! X I
* :
x ; x \
X X [ X , X j
X
X
X
X X i
i !
Inorganics
Aluminum i
Antimony 1
Arsenic ! x
Barium 1 x
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
X
X
X
X
Iron i x
Lead 1 x
Magnesium ' x x
i X
1
X
!
X
j
X
X
X
X
! x
X
1
X
• :
•'
x ! x ! i.
X i i;
1 i:
*
i i .1
X i '
1 :
! ! !
Manganese 1 x ; x x ; x i
.. Mercurv
i' Molybdenum
Nickel
*' Potassium
i Selenium
;: Silicon
:' Sodium
: Thallium
;; Vanadium
1 Zinc
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X __,
X
X
J
X
X
X
X
i
X
X i
1
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd 13c.wk3
A-31
22-Aue-95
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
1
Chemical
'. Organid
Acetone
iAroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
: Benzene
! Be azoic acid
i Benzyl alcohol
Btt(2-ethylhexyl) pbthalate
! Broinoforni
2-Butaaone
i n-Butyibenzefie.
• sec-Buiytbenzene
ten-Butylbenzene
I Butyl benzyl phtbaJate
Carbon doulfide
alpha— Chlordane
Chtorobenzene
Chloroform
|4.4'-DDD
4.4--DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dibenzofuran
12-Dichlorobenzene
1.3-DicUorobemene
1.4- DichJorobenzene
3 3'- Dichtorobenzidine
OichJorodifluororoethane
1.1- Dichloroe thane
1 1.2 -Dichloroe thane
Dichloroethenej f loul)
1.1 -Dichloroe thene
cis-11- Dichloroethene
trans- 1.2- Dichloroe tbene
1 2- Dichloroethene (total)*
Dieldrin
Diechyl ether
Diethvl phthalate
2.4 - Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl nhthalate
Di - n - butyl phthalate
Endrin aldehyde
Ethylbenzeoe
! Hexachlorobutadiene
1 Isopropyl benzene
1 4 -Isopropyl toluene
1 Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
: 2-Methylnaphtbalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methyiphenol
.Naphthalene
1 n-Nitrotodiphenylamine
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthytene
Anthneeoe
Benzo(a)aiiUincene
BenzoCatpyrene
BenzofblUuoranthene
! BenzoCcJiJ)perylene
Surface
Grafton Ditch
rUoDeri
X
X
X
X
—
X
Water
: Newfields Ditch
> CUpperl
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
! Sediment ,
> Grafton Ditch Newfields Ditch Wetlands'
1 CUpperl \ IVoott) '
x- x 1
i 'I
| j
! X" X
! 1 x
x" < x" x" j
; I
x" x j
J
• x
i
: X !
X j
.'
X ' T
X X : X
X X
i
i
i
- - • i
li
(I
j I
X
X i l|
i[
! i
1
X X X 1
i i
1 :
1 _ :
X
X
1
1
x .
x"
x" x"
x" x"
x*. x"
x"
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd 15d.wlc3
A-32
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 14
Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organic: (continued)
Benzo(k)fluoramhene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(aji)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
j Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene
Pnenanthrene
1 Pyrene
I Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
n— Propylbenzene
! Telrachloroethene
1 Toluene
1 1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene
i 1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
! 1.1.1 -Trichloroethane
1 Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene
1.3.5-TrimethyIbenzene
!! Vinyl chloride
1 m,p-Xylenes (total)
o-Xylene
IXylenes (total)"
Inorganics
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
| Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
i Copper
i Iron
ILead
; Magnesium
1 Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
1 Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium _ '
Thallium
Vanadium
IZinc
Surface Water
Grafton Ditch Newfields Ditch
fUppert CUppert
X
1
X 1
!
1
j
X
X I
x ;
: X
x ;
X i
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X i X
X
1 X
1 . x
i *
: X
i X
i X '
1 X 1
X
X ! X
X
X X
: X !
1
X
X 1 X
Grafton Ditch
i fUpuert
xd
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x !
X
1
X
X
Sediment
Newfields Ditch
rUpoer>
x°
x"
X"
x"
x"
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
t
X
X
X
X
X |
X
X 1
X
X
X
Wetlands'
!|
l" .i.!
X°
x"
X4
x°
x" i
X" !
* !
j!
1
. X i
j
,
i
ii
j
II
1
I
j
1
1
II
N
X 1
'
X ji
il
1
i!
il
1
X 1
1
!.
1
x i
i
l!
l!
il
"
X :i
..
DB = Deep bedrock: LS = Lower Sand; OB = overburden: BR = bedrock: SB = shallow bedrock: US = Upper Sand.
aAn "x" indicates that the chemical was selected as a chemical of concern for both the human health and ecological risk
assessments, unless otherwise indicated.
''Selected as chemicals of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
'Selected as chemicals of concern for the ecological risk assessment only.
dChemical was not detected above background.
'Chemical concentrations were reported as the total of all isomers in the media in which they were of concern.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd 15d.wk3
A-33
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 15
Most Reasonable Maximally Exposed Receptor (RME)/
Other Primary Potential Receptors and Potential Exposure Routes
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Pathway/
Data Set
Soil
Site 31
Site 33
Site 35
Site 38
Site 39
Current Scenario
RME
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Others
Building worker,
trespasser
Trespasser
Trespasser
Trespasser
Building worker,
trespasser
Future Scenario
RME
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Others
Building worker,
trespasser
Building worker,
trespasser
Building worker,
trespasser
Building worker,
trespasser
Building worker,
trespasser
Groundwater
All Data Sets
(except Haven well)
Haven Well
None
On-base worker
None
Visitor
Off-base resident
Off-base resident
On-base worker
On-base worker
Surface Water
Grafton Ditch
(upper)
Newfields Ditch
(upper)
Sediment
Grafton Ditch
(upper)
Newfields Ditch
(upper)
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Matnf i»n flflKf
worker
Maintenance
worker
Trespasser
Trespasser
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Trespasser
Trespasser
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Trespasser
Trespasser
Trespasser
Trespasser
Pathway"
Soil
Groundwater
Surface water
Sediment
Exposure Routes
• Incidental ingestion
• Dermal contact
• Ingestion
• Noningestion use (e.g.,
• Dermal contact
• Incidental ingestion
• Dermal contact
showering)
M»n\lU'T:OOfi»n«.00»\r3iwUp»
A-34
09/11/95
-------
Table 16
Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Medium
RME
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk*"
Mean
Soil"
Site 31 (0 to 2 feet
deep)
Site 31 (0 to IS feet
deep)
Site 33 (0 to 2 feet
deep)
Site 33 (0 to 15 feet
deep)
Site 35 (0 to 2 feet
deep)
Site 35 (0 to 15 feet
deep)
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
3E-06 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
1E-06 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
8E-07 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
2E-09 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
5E-09 (BG)
3E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
Total Hazard Index"
Mean
3E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
7E-06 (ALL)
7E-06 (BG)
4E-07 (ALL)
3E-07 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
1E-06 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
1E-06 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
2E-09 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
7E-09 (BG)
5E-07 (ALL)
3E-07 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
IE-OS (ALL)
IE-OS (BG)
5E-07 (ALL)
5E-07 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
2E-09 (BG)
3E-07 (ALL)
7E-09 (BG)
9E-07 (ALL)
7E-07 (BG)
6E-05 (ALL)
4E-05 (BG)
6E-05 (ALL)
4E-05 (BG)
8E-05 (ALL)
8E-05 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
5E-03 (ALL)
5E-03 (BG)
8E-03 (ALL)
8E-03 (BG)
3E-04 to 4E-
04 (ALL)'
3E-04 to 4E-
04 (BG)e
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
8E-05 (ALL)
6E-05 (BG)
8E-05 (ALL)
6E-05 (BG)
1E-04 (ALL)
1E-04 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
7E-03 (ALL)
7E-03 (BG)
1E-02 (ALL)
1E-02 (BG)
3E-04 to 4E-
04 (ALL)'
3E-04 to 4E-
04 (BG)e
3E-03 (ALL)
3E-03 (BG)
3E-03 (ALL)
3E-03 (BG)
Maximum
8E-05 (ALL)
6E-05 (BG)
8E-05 (ALL)
6E-05 (BG)
2E-04 (ALL)
2E-04 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
1E-02 (ALL)
1E-02 (BG)
2E-02 (ALL)
2E-02 (BG)
3E-04 to 4E-
04 (ALL)'
3E-04 to 4E-
04 (BG)'
6E-03 (ALL)
6E-03 (BG)
7E-03 (ALL)
7E-03 (BG)
MK01\RPT:0062802A.004\z3rod.apa
A-35
09/11/95
-------
Table 16
Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Medium
Soil" (continued)
Site 38 (0 to 2 feet
deep)
Site 38 (0 to IS feet
deep)
Site 39 (0 to 2 feet
deep)
Site 39 (0 to IS feet
deep)
RME
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk"*
Mean
1
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
9E-07 (ALL) .
9E-07 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
3E-06 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
1E-06 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
1E-06 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
7E-06 (ALL)
7E-06 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
5E-06 (ALL)
5E-06 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
4E-06 (ALL)
4E-06 (BG)
Maximum
4E-06 (ALL)
4E-06 (BG)
IE-OS (ALL)
IE-OS (BG)
5E-06 (ALL)
5E-06 (BG)
6E-06 (ALL)
SE-06 (BG)
6E-06 (ALL)
SE-06 (BG)
IE-OS (ALL)
IE-OS (BG)
Total Hazard Index"
Mean
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
SE-03 to 6E-
03 (ALL)'
5E-03 to 6E-
03 (BG)'
SE-03 to 6E-
03 (ALL)'
SE-03 to 6E-
03 (BG)'
5E-02 (ALL)
SE-02 (BG)
3E-02 (ALL)
3E-02 (BG)
2E-02 (ALL)
2E-02 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03(BG)
7E-03 to 8E-
03 (ALL)'
7E-03 to 8E-
03 (BG)'
6E-03 to 7E-
03 (ALL)'
6E-03 to 7E-
03 (BG)'
2E-01 (ALL)
2E-01 (BG)
1E-01 (ALL)
1E-01 (BG)
4E-02 (ALL)
4E-02 (BG)
Maximum
2E-03 to 3E-
03 (ALL)'
2E-03 to 3E-
03 (BG)'
1E-02 (ALL)
1E-02 (BG)
8E-03 to 9E-
03 (ALL)'
8E-03 to 9E-
03 (BG)'
2E-01 to 3E-
01 (ALL)'
2E-01 to 3E-
01 (BG)'
2E-01 to 3E-
01 (ALL)'
2E-01 to 3E-
01 (BG)'
9E-02 (ALL)
9E-02 (BG)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-36
09/11/95
-------
Table 16
Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Medium
RME
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk**
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
Total Hazard Index1*
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
Groundwater'
Site 31 Overburden
Site 31 Bedrock1
Sites 32/36
Overburden and
Shallow Bedrock —
Main
Sites 32/36
Overburden and
Shallow Bedrock —
Hot Spot
Sites 32/36 Deep
Bedrock — Main
Sites 32/36 Deep
Bedrock — Hot
Spot I1
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base-
resident
1E-06
(filtered)
NC
3E-04
(Filtered)
4E-02
(filtered)
2E-05
(filtered)
2E-05
(total)
5E-05
(filtered)
5E-05
(total)
2E-06
(filtered)
NA
5E-04
(filtered)
2E-01
(filtered)
3E-05
(filtered)
3E-05
(total)
NA
4E-06
(filtered)
NA
1E-03
(filtered)
2E-01
(filtered)
3E-05
(filtered)
3E-05
(total)
NA
2E-02
(filtered)
5E-05
(filtered)
5E-05
(total)
3E+00
(filtered)
4E+02
(filtered)
1E-01
(filtered)
1E-01
(total)
1E+00
(filtered)
1E+00
(total)
4E-02
(filtered)
NA
4E+00
(filtered)
2E+03
(filtered)
2E-01
(filtered)
2E-01
(total)
NA
8E-02
(filtered)
NA
1E+01
(filtered)
2E+03
(filtered)
4E-01
(filtered)
4E-01
(total)
NA
MK01\RTT:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-37
09/11/95
-------
Table 16
Summary of Total Ufetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Medium
RME
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk**
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
Total Hazard Index"
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
Groundwater1 (continued) '
Sites 32/36 Deep
Bedrock -Hot
Spot 11*
Site 33 Upper Sand
Site 33 Lower Sand
and Shallow
Bedrock
Site 34 Bedrock —
Main
Site 34 Bedrock —
Hot Spot
Sites 35/38/39
Overburden and
Shallow Bedrock,
Main, and Site 34
Overburden — Main
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
7E-05
(filtered)
7E-05
(total)
1E-03
(filtered)
1E-06
(filtered)
6E-06
(filtered)
6E-06
(total)
1E-03
(filtered)
1E-03
(total)
2E-04
(filtered)
NA
2E-03
(filtered)
2E-06
(filtered)
7E-06
(filtered)
7E-06
(total)
2E-03
(filtered)
3E-03
(total)
3E-04
(filtered)
NA
2E-03
(filtered)
2E-06
(filtered)
8E-06
(filtered)
8E-06
(total)
2E-03
(filtered)
3E-03
(total)
4E-03
(filtered)
2E+00
(filtered)
2E+00
(total)
2E+01
(filtered)
1E-01
(filtered)
1E-01
(filtered)
1E-01
(total)
3E+01
(filtered)
3E+01
(total)
9E+00
(filtered)
NA
3E+01
(filtered)
1E-01
(filtered)
1E-01
(filtered)
2E-01
(total)
6E+01
(filtered)
7E + 01
(total)
IE +01
(filtered)
NA
3E+01
(filtered)
2E-01
(filtered)
2E-01
(filtered)
3E-01
(total)
7E+01
(filtered)
7E+01
(total)
IE +02
(filtered)
MK01\RPT:00628026004\z3rodapa
A-38
09/11/95
-------
Table 16
Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Medium
RME
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk*"
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
Total Hazard Index**
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
Groundwater' (continued)
Sites 35/38/39
Overburden and
Shallow Bedrock —
Hot Spot I, and Site
34 Overburden —
Hot Spot 1
Sites 35/38/39
Overburden and
Shallow Bedrock —
Hot Spot II, and
Site 34 Overburden
- Hot Spot II«
Sites 35/38/39
Deep Bedrock
Sites 72/73/81
Overburden — Main
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
7E-05
(filtered)
6E-04
(Filtered)
2E-05
(filtered)
2E-05
(total)
2E-05
(filtered)
2E-04
(filtered)
NA
4E-05
(filtered)
4E-05
(total)
3E-05
(filtered)
2E-04
(filtered)
NA
5E-05
(filtered)
5E-05
(total)
7E-05
(filtered)
2E+00
(filtered)
7E+01
(filtered)
4E-01
(filtered)
4E-01
(total)
3E+00
(filtered)
6E+00
(filtered)
NA
1E+00
(filtered)
1E+00
(total)
8E+00
(filtered)
9E+00
(filtered)
NA
IE +00
(filtered)
1E+00
(total)
8E+00
(filtered)
MKOI\RPT:0062802fi.004\7.3rod.apa
A-39
09/11/95
-------
Table 16
Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Medium
RME
Groundwater' (continued)
Sites 72/73/81
uverourucn - HOI
Spot*
Sites 72/73/81
Bedrock
Haven Well**
Future off-base
resident
Future off-base
resident
Current on-base
worker
Future off-base
resident
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk"*
Mean
1E-02
(filtered)
2E-04
(filtered)
7E-04
(total)
4E-07 to
8E-06'
1E-06 to
3E-05'
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
NA
3E-04
(filtered)
2E-03
(total)
NA
NA
Maximum
NA
3E-04
(filtered)
2E-03
(total)
NA
• NA
Total Hazard Index*'
Mean
1E+02
(filtered)
9E-01
(filtered)
3E+00
(total)
3E-02
9E-02
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
NA
1E+00
(filtered)
8E+00
(total)
NA
NA
Maximum
NA
1E+00
(filtered)
8E+00
(total)
NA
NA
Surface Water"
Grafton Ditch
(Upper)
Ncwfields Ditch
(Upper)
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
5E-09 (ALL)
SE-09 (BG)
5E-09 (ALL)
5E-09 (BG)
5E-08 (ALL)
5E-08 (BG)
SE-08 (ALL)
5E-08 (BG)
8E-09 (ALL)
8E-09 (BG)
8E-09 (ALL)
8E-09 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
8E-09 (ALL)
8E-09 (BG)
8E-09 (ALL)
8E-09 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
4E-04 (ALL)
4E-04 (BG)
4E-04 (ALL)
4E-04 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
7E-04 (ALL)
7E-04 (BG)
7E-04 (ALL)
7E-04 (BG)
8E-03 (ALL)
8E-03 (BG)
8E-03 (ALL)
8E-03 (BG)
7E-04 (ALL)
7E-04 (BG)
7E-04 (ALL)
7E-04 (BG)
8E-03 (ALL)
8E-03 (BG)
8E-03 (ALL)
8E-03 (BG)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3nxl.ipa
A-40
09/11/95
-------
Table 16
Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Medium
Sediment"
Grafton Ditch
(Upper)
Newfields Ditch
(Upper)
RME
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk1*
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
6E-08 (ALL)
6E-08 (BG)
6E-08 (ALL)
6E-08 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
4E-07 (ALL)
3E-07 (BG)
4E-07 (ALL)
3E-07 (BG)
Maximum
1E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
9E-07 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
9E-07 (BG)
Total Hazard Index"
Mean
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum
5E-04 (ALL)
5E-04 (BG)
5E-04 (ALL)
5E-04 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03(BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
6E-03 (ALL)
6E-03 (BG)
6E-03 (ALL)
6E-03 (BG)
NA = Not applicable. Risk was evaluated based only on one exposure concentration.
NC = Not calculated. A toxicity value was not available for the chemical of concern.
'Values arc rounded to one significant figure.
bMaximum cancer risk at hazardous waste sites is regulated in the range of 1E-06 to 1E-04 (10"* to 10"*). Risks of less than 1E-06 (10*) are generally not
of concern.
CA hazard index of 1 (1E+00) or greater is usually considered the benchmark of potential concern.
"ALL = Includes all evaluated chemicals of concern.
BG = Includes only the evaluated chemicals of concern that were detected above background.
The first and second values'are based on the assumption that chromium is present entirely as chromium III and chromium VI, respectively. A range is
presented only if the two values differed after rounding to one significant figure.
'Filtered and total values are based on organics data plus inorganics data for filtered and unfiltered (total) samples, respectively.
'Data were limited to one well. The exposure concentration is the averaged concentration from that well.
'The available data were limited to analytical results for organic compounds.
The first and second values are based on the assumption that dichloroethenes (total) are present entirely as 1,1-dichloroethenes and 1,2-dichloroethenes,
respectively.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\7.1rod.apa
A-41
09/11/95
-------
Table 17
Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
for the Short-tailed Shrew
Site 33, Pease AFB, NH
' Chemical
Orgmaics
' Aroctor-1254
jAroctor-1260
1 Bb(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
i Carbon disulfide
14,4'- DDT
14.4' -DDE
i Diethylether
• Di-n-butylphthalate*
.PAHs
! Benzo(a)anthracene*
1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene*
Benzo(k)fluorantheoe*
Benzo(a)pyrene*
1 Chrysene*
Fluoranthene*
: Phenanthrene*
Pyrene*
, Pentachlorophenol*
Toluene
: Inorganics
Anenk
Calcium
Nickel
Silicon
Sodium
Thallium
Zinc
Hazard Quotients for
Soil
: Ingestion
' Averate Maximum
132E-02 1 1.92E-02
5.56E-03 7.17E-03
i 238E-03 9.00E-03
2.74E-05 ! 5.14E-05
825E-02 1.95E-01
1.54E-03 2.81E-03
8.70E-07 9.00E-07
1.05E-04 U6E-04
3.43E-03 ' 3.60E-03
NE NE
NE , NE
1.75E-04 1.75E-04
NE NE
9.84E-05 1.20E-04
3.S4E-03 ! 3J4E-03
1.69E-04 , 220E-04
2.65E-03 2.65E-03
3.24E-07 3.60E-07
!
3.13E+00 ! 636E+00;
NE NE ;
3.61E-01 7.50E-01
NE i NE ]
NE - NE
2.73E+00 1.10E+01
4J5E-01 9.75E-01
Hazard Quotients for ;
Invertebrate j
Ingestion
Average ! Mazimum !
1 ;
7.26E+00 ! 1.06E+01 '
3.06E+00 : 3.95E+00 ;
NE NE
NE !. NE
2.14E+01 5.07E+01
2.78E-01 5.06E-01 '
NE NE
NE NE
1.03E-02' 1.08E-02
NE 1 NE
NE NE
1.40E-03. 1.40E-03:
NE i NE i
1.97E-04 i 2.40E-04 i
1.06E-02 1.06E-02 '••
339E-04 1 4.40E-04
NE NE !
NE : NE '
8.13E+00 i 1.65E+01 '
NE i NE
1.66E+01 3.45E+01 i
NE ; NE
NE , NE
NE NE [
123E+02 2.63E+02 i
I! Cumulative Hazard Inder
Total
Hazard Index
Averate Maximnm ;
7.27E-I-00 1.06E+01
3.06E*00 3.95E+00
2J8E-03 9.00E-03
2.74E-05. 5.14E-05
2.15E+01 5.09E+01
2.79E-01 5.09E-01 .
8.70E-07 9.00E-07
1.05E-04 1.56E-04
137E-02 1.44E-02 '
NE NE
NE NE
1J8E-03 1J8E-03
NE NE
2.95E-04 3.60E-04
1.41E-02 1.41E-02
5.08E-04 6.60E-04
2.65E-03 2.65E-03
324E-07 3.60E-07
1.13E+01 2.29E+01
NE i NE i
1.70E+01 3.53E+01
NE NE
NE i NE
2.73E+00 i 1.10E+01
123E+02 2.64E+02
1.86E+02! 3.99E+02
NE = Not evaluated due to lack of dose Total Cumulative Hazard Index: ! ;i
and/or CTV. Above Background
1.86E+02 3.99E+02
•Soil concentrations below background levels.
MK01\RPT:00628026.00«z3rd_tl8.wk3
A-42
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 18
Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
for the Short-tailed Shrew
Site 34, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organfcs
Acetone
Benzoic acid
I Benzyl alchohol
Bis(2 - ethylhexyl)phthalate*
: Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chlorobenzene
4,4'-DDD*
4,4'-DDE
4.4'-DDT
Di - n - butylphthalate
Hazard Quotients for
Soil
Ingestion
Average
1J56E-04
5.43E-03
NE
8.94E-04
6.37E-OS
1.06E-05
1.64E-05
2.08E-02
3.54E-01
2.95E-02
Methylene chloride i 8.88E-04
PAHs
Anthracene* > 1.65E-05
Hazard Quotients for
Invertebrate
Ingestion
Maximum Average
555E-04
6.60E-03
NE
9.60E-04
6.60E-05
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
2.12E-05 NE
631E-05
3.44E-03
1.13E-01 3.75E+00
1.86E+00 9.19E+01
6.96E-02 : NE
2.73E-03 ! NE
1.65E-05
Benzo(a)anthracene* 2.72E-02 3.90E-02
Benzo(a)pyrene* ' 1.70E-03
Benzo(b)fluoranthene* , NE
Benzo(g,h,i)peiylene* : NE
Benzo(k)fluoranthene* NE
Chrvsene* ; NE
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene* NE
Fluoranthene* 3.91E-04
Indeno(l,23-cd)pyrene* NE
Phenanthrene 3.31E-02
Pyrene* 5.82E-04
Pentachlorophenol j 1.05E-02
Tetrachloroethene 1 3.33E-04
Inorganics
Arsenic
2.72E+00
Beryllium 2.27E-01
Iron 2.73E+03
Mercury^ 6.11E-02
Vanadium 1.08E+01
NE = Not evaluated due to Isc
and/or CTV.
'Soil concentrations below
background levels.
k of dose
238E-03
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.65E-05
8.16E-02
136E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE | NE
1.07E-03 ; 7.82E-04
NE i NE
7.18E-02 ' 9.93E-02
1.22E-03 1.16E-03
1.05E-02 • NE
1.17E-03 ; NE
1
6.86E+00 ! 133E+01
4.44E-01 i NE
9.63E+03 '• NE
1.43E-01 2.26E+00
Total
Hazard Index
Maximum Average
NE
1J6E-04
Maximum
5.55E-04
NE 5.43E-03 6.60E-03
NE
NE
NE
NE
U2E-02
2.03E+01
4.85E+02
NE
NE
1.65E-05
1.17E-01
1.90E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
2.14E-03
NE
2.15E-01
2.44E-03
NE
8.94E-04
637E-05
1.06E-05
3.45E-03
3.77E+00
923E+01
2.95E-02
NE
9.60E-04
6.60E-05
2.12E-05
133E-02
2.04E+01
4.87E+02
6.96E-02
8.88E-04 2.73E-03
330E-05
1.09E-01
153E-02
330E-05
1.56E-01
2.14E-02 !
NE NE j
NE NE
NE NE j
NE
NE
1.17E-03
NE
NE i
3.20E-03
NE ; NE
132E-01 2.87E-01
1.75E-03 3.66E-03 !
NE 1.05E-02; 1.05E-02II
NE ; 333E-04. 1.17E-03!
336E+01
i,
1.61E+01 4.05E+01 ;
NE 2.27E-01 4.44E-01 ,
NE 2.73E+03 9.63E+03 !:
529E+00 232E+00: 5.43E-HOOi,
2.47E+01 NE NE 1.08E+01 2.47E+01 ;
Total Cumulative Hazard Index: 2.86E+03 1.02E+04 ,
Total Cumulative Hazard Index: . i1
Above Background
2.86E+03 1.02E+04 i
MK01\RPT:00628026.00*z3rd U9.wk3
A-43
22-AUR-9S
-------
Table 19
Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
for the Short-tailed Shrew
Site 39, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Orgaaia
Bs(2-ethylhexyl)phthaUte
PAHs
Benzo(a)antbracene*
Benzo(a)pyrene1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chrysene*
Fluoranthene*
Pbeoantfarene
Pyreae*
luorgutio
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium"
Hazard Quotients for
Soil
Incestkn
' Average
8.70E-04
1.15E-02
8.83E-04
ME
NE
M^*imn|n
1.65E-03
3.10E-02
259E-03
NE
NE
2.06E-04 438E-04
1.10E-02
2.79E-02
2.58E-04 ' 7.30E-04
3.19E-02
5.68E-02
1.70E-01 ! 2.96E-01
8.83E-01 1.95E+00
VE * Not evaluated due to lade of dose
and/or CTV. ;
Hazard Quotients for I
Invertebrate >
Ingestion ;
Averaxe N(axi>nBTitnipf^
8.70E-04 1.65E-03 i
4.60E-02 124E-011
7.95E-03 2.33E-02
NE ' NE
NE NE
6.17E-04 1.31E-03
439E-02 1.11E-01
7.73E-041 2.19E-031
3.19E-02 5.68E-0211
5.62E+01 9.80E-I-01 !
2.74E+01 6.04E+01,;
8J7E+01 U9E-t-02;
Cundative Hazard Index: ;
Above Background
8J6E+01 1.59E+02
*Soil concentrations below background levels.
bCTV based on hexavalent chromium.
MK01\RPTK»62a026.00*z3rd t2ttwk3
A-44
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 20
Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
for the Robin, Site 33
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
' Organia
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
l| Bis(2-ethylhe*yl)phtha]ate
.Hazard Quotients for
Invertebrate
: Insertion
Average
NE
1.04E+01
NE
Carbon disulfide NE
i 4.4--DDT 1.18E+00
li 4.4--DDE 2.96E-01
; Dieihylether NE
' Di-n-butylphthalate* .
NE
;! PAHs
: Benzo(a)anthracene* 1.63E-05
i- Benzo(b)fluoranthene*
5.21E-05
'• Benzo(k)fluoranthene* 3.62E-05
Benzo(a)pyrene' 3.56E-05
' Chrysene* ; 3.49E-05
Ruoranthene* 2.60E-05
Phenanthrene' : 1.57E-05
Pyrene* 2.69E-05
Pentachlorophenol* ! NE
1 Toluene ' NE
; Inorganics
i Arsenic 1 5.16E+00
. Calcium NE
Nickel
2.00E+00
Silicon . j NE
Sodium i NE
Thallium
Zinc
NE
8.23E+01
NE = Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV.
'Soil concentration below background level.
Maximum
NE
1.34E+01
NE
NE
Hazard Quotients for
Soil Ingestion
Average
NE
1.88E-02
NE
Mazmmm
NE
2.43E-02
NE
NE i NE
2.78E+00 4.53E-03
5.40E-01
NE
1.07E-02
1.65E-03 3.00E-03
NE
NE i NE
1.71E-05
5.84E-05
3.71E-05
3.56E-05
4.00E-05
3.17E-05
1.57E-05
3.49E-05
NE
5.44E-06
6.51E-06
6.03E-06
4.44E-06
NE
NE
5.71E-06
7.30E-06
6.19E-06
4.44E-06
8.73E-06 l.OOE-05
1.30E-05 i U9E-05
5.24E-06 | 5.24E-06
Total
Hazard Indices
Average
NE
1.04E+01
NE
NE
1.18E+00
2.98E-01
NE
NE
2.18E-05
5.86E-05
4.22E-05
4.00E-05
4J7E-05
3.90E-05
2.10E-05
1.34E-05 1.75E-05 4.03E-05
9.02E-04 j 9.02E-04 9.02E-04
NE NE NE
1.05E+01
NE
4.16E+00
NE
NE
NE
1.76E+02
1.99E+00
NE
4J55E-02
4.04E+00
NE
NE
1
7.15E+00
NE
9.05E-02 2.05E+00 i
NE NE NE !
NE i NE NE
NE
NE '1 NE i
3.05E-01 653E-01
Cumulative Hazard fader.
Cumulative Hazard Index:
Above Background
8.26E+01 ;
1.04E+02
tn m iiiinm
NE
1.34E+01
NE
NE
2.79E+00
5.43E-01
NE
NE
2.29E-05
6.57E-05 1
4.33E-05 i
4.00E-05
5.00E-05
4.76E-05
2.10E-05!
5.24E-05 i
9.02E-04 1
NE i
1.46E+01
NE
4.25E+00
NE !
NE
NE
1.77E+02!
2.13E+02 i
ii
1.O4E+02
2.13E+02J
MK01'JMT:00628026.004\z3rd_t21.wk3
A-45
I2-Auj-»5
-------
Table 21
Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
for the Robin, Site 34 Wetlands Sediments
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Hazard Q«otie>H for
j lavertebrate
! Imcettioa
Cbeaicat ' Averate »»••«••«
Hazard Qvotieati for
Surface Water
UfeitkM froai
Graftoa Oitebei
i
Hazard Qootieou
i
For : Total
SoU laxettioa Hazard Indices
Avcf&itc t MiVriir *" T AvcruK MATinnfli
Orgtaka
Acetone
Benzene
Benzoicacid
Benzvlilchohol
Bi$(2-e«hylh«v1)phitul»te'
Bromoform
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chlorobenzene
4.4' -ODD*
4.4--DDE
4.4--DDT
CU-1.2-Dichlofoethene
Trans - 1.2 - Dichloroeihene
Di-n-butylphthalaie
Elhvfeenzene
Methviene chloride
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-MethylphenoI
4-Methylphenol
PAHs
Anthracene*
Benzo(a)anthraeenea
Benzo[i)pyrene'
Bcnzo(b)fluoranthenea
Beazo(s.h.i)pervtene*
BenzoOOfluoranthene*
Chrysene*
Dibenzo(a.h ^anthracene1
Fluoranthene*
IndenoHJJ-cdHttrene1
Phcnanthrene
Pvrene*
Phenol
Penuchloropheaol
Tetnchloroethene
Toluene
Trichtoroethene
1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene
lJ.5-Trimethylbenzene ,
Vinvl chloride
Xvtenesftotan
I
NE ! NE
NE
NE
NE ! NE
. NE | NE
NE ! NE
NE NE
NE NE
i NE NE
! 1.66E-01 ' 6.35E-01
3.96E+00 2.16E+01
J.20E-t-00 ilME-t-Ol
. NE ' NE
NE : NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE j NE
NE NE
:
1.75E-05 , 1.75E-05
1.30E-04' '1.86E-04
3.45E-04 ,4.83E-04
3.43E-04 4.S7E-04
1.90E-04 J.90E-04
2.11E-04
3.24E-04
1.82E-04 2.9SE-04
7.94E-05
1.03E-04
3.30E-04
7.94E-05
2.83E-04
3.33E-04
1.47E-04 i3.19E-M
9.24E-05
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.94E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE NE
I
NE
: NE
i NE
! NE
: NE
: NE
. NE
. NE
NE
: NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE i
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE :
NE i
NE '
NE
9.ME-03 !
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.05E-02
i
2.46E-Q3 ' 9.12E-05
NE ' NE
NE NE
NE NE
! NE ' NE
: NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
7.90E-04 . 3.02E-03
2.20E-02 1.20E-01
2.00E-02 1.02E-01
NE ' NE
! NE NE
NE : NE
NE NE
NE i NE
NE i NE
NE _ NE
NE i NE
1.7JE-05 1.75E-05
4.33E-05 6.19E-05
L 4.32E-05 i 6.03E-05
4.29E-05 i 5.71E-05
3.17E-05 I 3.17E-05
3.52E-05 I 5.40E-05
4.JI5E-05 7.46E-05
1.59E-05 i 1.59E-05
5.17E-OS 1.41E-04
3.30E-05 3.33E-05
4.90E-05 1.06E-04
4.62E-05 9.68E-05
NE NE
3.57E-03 3.J7E-03
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
: 2.46E-05 9.12E-OJ .
NE NE
NE NE
i NE NE
: NE NE
; NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
1.67E-01 ! 6.38E-01
3.98E+00 2.17Ef01 :
! 5.22E+00 2.67E-I-01 !
NE NE
NE ' NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
3.49E-05 3.49E-05
1.73E-04 2.48E-04
r 3.89E-04 5.43E-04 '
3.86E-04 514E-04
2.22E-04 2.22E-04
2.47E-04 3.78Er04
' 2.28E-04 3.73E-04
9.52E-05 9.52E-05 ,
1.53E-04 4.24E-04
3.63E-04 3.67E-04 ,
1.96E-04 4.25E-04 I
1.39E-04 2.90E-04 |
NE NE
3.57E-03 3.57E-03 !
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE :
NE NE
NE NE
NE NE •
9.88E-03 1.05E-02
NE » Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV.
A-46
22-Aiif-K
-------
Table 21
Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
for the Robin, Site 34 Wetlands Sediments
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Inorganics
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium"
' Cobalt
Copper
Hazard Quotient* for
Invertebrate
Ingestion
Average
'NE
8.47E+00
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
i Iron i NE
| Lead NE
! Magnesium
NE
i Manganese | NE
Mercury i 4.09E+00
; Molybdenum
1 Nickel
i Potassium
' Silicon
Sodium
Vanadium
: Zinc
NE
Mwtimroi
NE
2.14E+01
NE
NE '
Hazard Quotient* for
Surface Water
Ingestion from
Upper Newfaeld* and
Graflon Ditches
Average
NE
3.15E-01
. NE
NE
NE ! 7.49E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
2.45E-03
NE _j
2.14E-01
NE
1.82E-02
NE '• 1.17E+00
NE
NE
NE
9.57E+00
NE
MjTJmQiti
Hazard Quotient*
For
Soil Ingestion
Averace
i
NE i NE
1.31E+00
NE
1.73E+00
NE
NE ! NE
2.73E-01 NE
1.42E-02
NE
1.57E+00
NE
NE
NE
NE NE
1.26E-01
NE
4.10E+00 ! 3.06E+00
1.15E-02 1.11E-01 ! NE
1.56E-02 I3.11E-02
4.65E-01
1.79E+00
4.74E-03 1.66E-02
NE NE
NE NE i 6.90E-03
NE
NE
NE T NE
2.95E-02
NE
NE i NE NE
NE ; NE
NE
NE NE
NE NE NE
NE NE 8.37E-02 5.48E-01
i
NE = Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV. j
"Soil concentrations below background level.
NE
NE
1.11E-01
NE
NE
M-Mimnm
ME
4.36E+00
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Total
Hazard Indices
Average
NE
l.OSE+01
NE
NE
7.49E-02
2.45E-03
NE
2.14E-01
NE NE
NE 1.82E-02
1.08E+01 4.23E+00
NE
NE
NE
2.59E-01
NE
NE
NE NE
NE | NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Total Cumulative Hazard Index:
Total Cumulative Hazard Index:
Above Background
1.15E-02 ;
1.56E-02 !
4.65E-01 :
4.21E+00 ;
NE
6.90E-03 !
NE '•
NE
NE |
NE
8.37E-02 '
2.92E+01 !
Maximum
NE
2.70E+01
NE
NE
2.73E-01
1.42E-02
NE
1.57E+00
NE
1.26E-01
1.49E+01
1.11E-01
3.UE-02
1.79E+00
9.85E+00
NE
2.95E-02 !
NE
NE
NE 1
NE
5.48E-01
1.05E+02
2-91E+01 i
1.05E+02
bCTV based on hexavalent chromium.
MKOI\RFT:00628026.004\z3id.t22.«U
A-47
-------
Table 22
Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
for the Robin, Site 39
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
I
i
; Chemical
, Orgtaicg
\ Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
, PAH$
1 Benzo(a)antbracene*
Benzofaypyrene1
i Benzo(b)fluoranthene
i Chrysene1
| Fluoranthene*
Phenanthrene
Pyrene*
Hazard Quotients for j
Invertebrate j
Inceatioo j
Average
NE
5.48E-05
1.79E-04
4.41E-04
9.76E-05
5.44E-05
4.88E-05
Hazard Quotients for i
Sofl Ingestioa !
Maxmvnn ' Averate i Maxim
-------
Table 23
Summary of Hazard Quotients for Surface Water
and Ambient Water Quality Criteria
for Upper Newfields Ditch
Pease AFB, NH
'
Chemical
Org*aies
Benzene Acid
Bis(2-ethylhexyi)phthalate
Bromofonn
Chlorobenzene
Cis-li-Dichtoroe there
T- 1.2-Dichloroethene
2-Methylphenol
iTrichloroethene
i; Vinyl Chloride
| laorgttucs ;
: Aluminum
ii Arsenic
• Barium
Beryllium
"Boron :
! Cadmium
i Calcium :
(Chromium (III)*
Chromium (VI)11
Cobalt
Copper
• Iron .
iLead '
1 Magnesium
i Manganese :
I Mercury • •
Molybdenum
i Nickel i
! Potassium '
i Silicon
i Sodium
! Vanadium
Zinc
Surface Water
Concentration
in Upper NewfieUs Ditch
(ugflL)
Average M«rinnwi
3.00E+00
S32E+00
3.00E+00
9.00E+00
l.OOE-01 l.OOE-01
l.OOE-01
1.39E+01
l.OOE-01
New Hampshire
Water Quality
Criteria
(ugrt.)
Acute
1.54E+OS '
NCA
NCA
2.50E+ 02 c
6.30E+M 1.16E+ 04 "
2.00E+00 8.00E+00! 1.16E+04 °
5.28E+00
6.62E+00
2.10E+00
1.07E+04
6.32E+01
4.67E+02
2.90E+00
8.80E+01
8.80E+00
S.7SE+OOI 5.00E+03e
4.60E+01
l.OOE+01
3.06E+04
2.63E+02
3.18E+OB
4.50E+04
NCA
7JOE+02
8.50E+02
5.00E+04 '
1.30E+01 1.30E+02
S.90E+02
Chronic
NCA
2.50E+OP °
NCA
S.OOE-t-01 °
NCA
NCA
NCA
2.19E+04
NCA
8.70E+01
Acute Freshwater
AWQC Hazard
Quotient
• AveTaff^ M"**1*!!!!!!
1.9SE-06
NE
1.95E-06
NE
NE '. NE
4.00E-04
120E-03
1.72E-04
1.06E-03
1.47E-04
NE
1.43E-f01
4.80E+01 7.44E-02
NCA
S.30E+00
NCA ! 6.40E+Q3 *
5.10E+01 1.72E+01 '
. 6.18E+W 1.33E+05j NCA
2.03E+01 ! 1.49E+Q2
3.17E+00 '
NCA
5.07E+03 ' 6.04E+02 '
226E+00 ( 1.66E+01 1.60E+01
6.43E+01 i 3.9JE+02
2.73E+01 ! 1.88E+02
1.10E+01
NCA i NCA
6.08E+01 '
1.14E+05! 3.99E+Q5I NCA
1-24E+02 i 1.19E+03
1.58E+04
4.20E+03
2.00E-01
6.73E+01
8.37E+01
3.90E+CB
1.33E+04
1.16E+04
7.09E+01
3.15E+W
1.62E+04
7.00E-01
4.32E-1-02 '
NCA
3.62E+01 '
l.OOE+03
1.68E+01 '
NCA
NCA ! NCA
2.40E+00
2.42E+OZ ' NCA
4.11E+Q2
6.8SE-f03
3.91E+M
S.88E+W
S.01E+02
4.29E+03 '
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
2.98E+02 2.3SE+03 1 3.54E+02 '
120E-02
6.00E+01 '
4.77E+02 '
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
3.21E+02 '
9.34E-03
2^3E-02
NE
5.13E-01
NE
4.00E-03
1.41E-01
NE
4.49E-01
NE
2.87E-01
NE
NE
8.33E-02
NE
1.95E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
8.4JE-01
4.00E-04
S.43E-03
6.90E-04
1.15E-03
1.02E-CB
NE
4.08E-I-01
3.09E-01
6J6E-Q2
Chronic Freshwater j
AWQC Hazard
Quotient [
AweraKe
NE
2.13E+00
NE
2.00E-03
NE
Maximum 1
:
NE !
3.60E+00 :
NE
2.00E-03 !
NE i
NE i NE i
NE
3.02E-04
NE
1.23E+02
1J2E+00
NE
l.OOE-01 i S.47E-01
NE 1.38E-02
2.97E+00
2.78E+00
NE i NE
2.94E-02
1.04E+00
NE
3.09E+00
NE
2.76E+00
NE
NE
2.92E-01
NE
3J6E-02
2.05E-01
NE
2.10E-03
NE
1
3.52E-t-02 ;
5.48E+00
NE i
2.45E+00:
922E-02 ]
1.61E+01 I
NE
2.47E-01 i
1.51E+00!
NE NE
7^5E-01
1.14E+02
520E+00,
3.99E*CG:
7.37E+00 7.07E+01
NE NE ;
NE
1.67E+01
NE
S.83E+01 :
1.12E+OOI 4.03E-I-00
9.58E-02 1.76E-01 i 8.62E-OI
NE NE NE
NE NE NE
NE
NE
NE NE
NE
NE
6.63E+OOI 9.28E-01 7J2E*00
NCA = No criteria available.
NE = Not Evaluated due to lack of applicable criteria.
"Value based on a 24-day LC50 value for Daphnia magna reported in AQUIRE database (G-8).
^alue is for phthalate esters.
'Value is for chlorinated benzenes.
dValue is for dichloroethylenes.
'Value based on a 48-day LC30 value for Daphnia magna reported in AQUIRE database (G-8).
'Soluble barium concentration in fresh and marine water generally would have to exceed SO mg/L before toxkity
to aquatic life could be expected (G—149).
KValue based on a 21-day NOEL value for Daphnia magna reported in Eisler (G-13S).
hMeasured total chromium concentrations were assumed to contain 10% hexavalem and 90% trivalent species.
'Value based on a measured hardness of 370 mg/L CaCO,
'Value based on proposed criteria for protection of aquatic invertebrates presented in Eisler (1985).
MK01\RPT:OOSa026.00«i3r
-------
Table 24
Summary of Hazard Quotients for Surface Water
and Ambient Water Quality Criteria
for Upper Grafton Ditch
Pease AFB, NH
1
Orgaaks
Benzene
Bb(2-ethvlhexyl)phthalate
Ethyl Benzene
2-Methylnaphlhalene
4-Methylphenol
Phenol
Toluene
1 ,2,4-Trimelhylbenzene
1.3,5 -Trimelhlybenzene
Xyfenes (total)
laorgMaics
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Calcium
Nkkel
Silicon
Zinc
Surface Water
Coacentration
Im Grafton Ditch (upper)
ta*/U
Average 1 Maiinum
3.75E+00
3.50E+00
S.60E+00
7.00E+00
5.88E+01
1.29E+01
1.86E+01
6.50E-01
3.00E-01
1.50E+02
9.85E+02
5.45E+01
I.33E+02
2.66E+04
2.04E+01
5.84E+03
7.28E+01
1.50E+01
4.00E+00
1.07E+01
1.30E+01
230E+02
3.80E+01
7.80E+01
8.00E-01
3.00E-01
1.60E+02
1.87E+03
8.40E+01
2.15E+02
3.75E+04
3.33E+01
6.84E+03
7.80E+01
New Hampshire
Water Qwlity
Criteria
f«/U
Acute
530E+03
NCA
3.20E+04
NCA
NCA
1.02E+04
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.50E+05 D
7.50E+02
5.00E+04 c
NCA
NCA
1.10E+03 *
NCA
9.04E+01 e
\ Chronfc
NCA
3.00E+00 •
NCA
NCA
NCA
2.56E+03
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
8.70E+01
NCA
6.40E+03 d
NCA
1.22E+02 e
NCA
8.18E+01 c
Acute Freshwater
AWQC Hazard
Qvofient
Average
7.08E-04
NE
1.7SE-04
NE
NE
1.26E-03
NE
NE
NE
l.OOE-03
1.31E+00
1.09E-03
NE
NE
1.86E-02
NE
8.06E-01
U..imum
2.83E-03
NE
3.34E-04
NE
NE
3.73E-03
NE
NE
NE
1.07E-03
2.49E+00
1.68E-03
NE
NE
3.04E-02
NE
8.63E-01
Chronic Freshwater
AWQC Hazard
Quotient
Average 1 Maximum
NE
1.17E+00
NE
NE
NE
5.03E-03
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.13E+01
NE
2.07E-02
NE
1.68E-01
NE
8.90E-OL
NE
U3E+00
NE
NE
NE
1.48E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
2.15E+01
NE
3.36E-02
NE
2.73E-01
NE
:. ?;$3jlroi
NCA = No criteria available.
NE - Not Evaluated due to lack of applicable criteria.
'Value is for phthalate esters.
bValuc based on a 24 hour LC^ value for Daphnia magna reported in AQUIRE database (G-8).
cSoluble barium concentration in fresh and marine water generally would have to exceed 50 mg/L before toxicity
to aquatic life could be expected (G-149).
''Value based on a 21 day NOEL value for Daphnia magna reported in Eislcr (G-135).
cValue based on a calculated hardness of 73.7 mg/L CaCO-j (based on measured calcium and magnesium concentrations in Upper Grafton Ditch).
MK01\RP1!00628026.004\z3rd_l2.Vwk3
A-50
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 25
Comparison of Sediment Concentration! to NOAA Biological Rffcct Levels
for Upper Newfields Dilcb.
Zone 3. Pease AFB. Nil
f%f||fe*l
Orguics
Acetone
Bb(2-efhvthcxyl)phlhalate
Alpha-Chic rdane
2-Butanoae
4,4'— DDD
4.4'- DDE
4,4'- DDT
1.2-DichIoroclbene flotal)
Di-n-butylphnUte
PA! Is
!!eiizo|alaalbntcencb
|}enznfa|pyreiicD
Urazof b|Quoraatbeoe
Beazo|k|fluoranlheae
Ikozok Acid0
Chrysene0
Huonmlheoe
rhenanihreae1*
Pyreae"
Trithloroclbcae
Vinyl Chloride
.•orguici
Alum bum
Anenfc
Ha r rum
Beiytlhim
Doroo
Oadmhira
Chromhioi (total)
Coball
Iron
Lead
Mitotnnese
Mercury
Nickel
Thallium
Vanadium
/.•DC
Sodbrat
Comtemtnitam
AwefMe
9.72E-02
6.37B-02 '
8.90E-03
3.16B-02
9.3IB-02
2.38E-02
I02E+00
2.26E+OI '
I.05H+00
9.406-02
7.2SE-02
4.22E-OI
4.4211-01
7.85E-OI
1206-01
3.78E-OI
I.99E-OI
J.04E-01
7.70B-03
7.14E+bO '
1.J5E-0!
8.63E+03
7.I2E+OI
I.IOJ+00
1.25E-fOO
JlOKtOI
JOSE +00
2.27E+01
2.I5B+OI
2070+04
613E+01
4.00B*02
1.6SB-01
39
-------
Table 26
Comparison of Interstitial Water Concentrations
Upper Newfields Ditch Sediment and Toricitjr Values
Zone 3, Peace AFB. NH
Stath»8139
i
Benzole acid
4.4--DDE
PAH»
Fluonnthene
Pvreae*
Intentitial Water
CoMCMtntkcs
LOSE +02
4.47E-04
5J6E-02
1.93E-01
Toocitr
V«fae»
1.44E+05
1.Q5E+03
8.12E+00
4.00E-01
Hazard
7.36E-04
4.26E-07
6.84E-03
4.82E-01
Statka80tt
Bu(2-ethylh0iyl)phthalaie '
4.4'-DDD
Di-n-butylphtfaalale*
Trichloroetbvleae
143E-02,
2.47E-04J
2.13E-02'
3.78E+001
3.00E+00 8.10E-03
6.00E-02 j 4.12E-03
3.00E+00 1 7.10E-03!
2.19E-I-04 1.73E-04
SutiaiSOM
BeazokKid*
Bis(2-etliyliayi)phthalue '
alpha-Chlorine
4.4--DDD
4.4--DDE
Di-n-butytphtfaakte*
PAHf
Beozo(a)«ntfaraceae *
Benzo(a)pyTCDe
OuyMne*
Fhiorandiene
Phenandircoe '
Pyreae*
S.82E+01
4.07E-02
138E-03
7J2E-04
USE -04
1.7«E-02
2.36E-OJ
3.97E-04
2.04E-02
6.17E-OI
1.46E+05
3.00E+00
4.30E-03
S.OOE-02
1.05E+03
3.00E+00
l.OOE+00
S.OOE-01
l.OQE+02
8.12E+00
3.80E-01 6.32E+00
1.66E-01 4.00E-01
3.99E-04
1.36E-02
5.54E-01
1.20E-Q2
128E-07
5.88E-03
2.36E-03
7.95E-04
2.04E-04
7.60E-03
6.01E-02
4.14E-01
i Statin 8045 | 4.4' -ODD ; 2J9E-03 6.00E-02
4.4 -DDE
; TiichJoro^hyfenc
6.49E-04 1.05E+03
4.91E+01 Z19E+04
3.81E-02
6.18E-07
224E-03;
i
Statio>S32 Bii(2-ethyBi«Jtyi)phthaia«e '
3.14E-Q2 : 3.00E-I-00
1 Di-n-buty)phtbalue '< 7.28E-01 3.00E+00
1.0SE-(E :
2.43E-01
| i
iStotioOl Bi>(2-etfayliaq4)phduUte' ' 2.02E-01
• 4.4' -ODD
j 4.4--DDE
1 Di-n-buiyiphthalate
! ~ : PAHS
Bcozo(a)«nthncaie *
: Bcnzo(a)pytcac'
1 Chiyscne*
• FkioraodMoe
Pbtaaadmne *
i Pyicuc
2.63E-02
9.43E-04
1.56E+00
3.00E+00
6.00E-02
l.OSE+03
3.00E+00
7.71E-03 '• l.OOE+00
1.66E-03
6.9IE-02
S.OOE-01
1.00E+Q2
I.94E-01 8.12E+00
9.82E-01
6.16E-01
6J2E-KOO
6.74E-02 !
4.38E-OI
8.98E-07
5.21E-01
7.71E-03 i
3J3E-03
6.91E-04
2J9E-02J
1.55E-01 !
4.00E-01 : 134E-t-00 1
4.4--DDT
2.52E-02
5.10E+00
300E+00 B^ic_m
l.OOE-03
5.10E+Q3 1
1
^tafiM MM KtfJ— Athvahnvhnhrhabt^ "
j ! 4.4'-DDE
: Toluene
4 43E-CE
325E-05
300E-fOO
l.OSE-t-03
148E— 02'
3.09E-08 j
4.13E+00: 1.30E+03 ; 3.17E-03!
•Owmical was included abhoufh it wai not detected above backfround cooeentnlkias.
A-52
-------
Table 27
Comparison of Sediment Concentrations to NO A A Biological
Effect Levels for Upper Graf ton Ditch
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organics
Acetoneb
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalateb
i n • h
A A' nnr;
Diethylcthcr
Di- n -bulylphthalalc
2-Methylnaphlhalenc
Naphthalene
Toluene
Inorganics
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Vanadium
' Sediment
Concentration
in Upper Grafton Ditch
(me/kg)
. Average 1 Maximum
6.35E-02
1.47E-01 a
1320-02
I.41E-02
1.20E-02
2.93E+00
5.43E+00
3.43E+00
6.10H-03
1.16E+04
2.92E+01
4.79E+01
8.16E-01 1
1.02E+01
1.44E+04
5.86E+01
4.42E+02
1.78E-01
2.66U+00
5.02E+01.
1.70E-01
1.84E-01 a
1.40E-02
2.00E-02
J.20E-02
3.90E+00
6.50E+01
3.80E+01
9.00E-03
1.97E+04
4.83E+01
1.03E+02
1.80E+00
2.31E+01
2.67E+04
1.19E+02
1.12E+03
4.50E-01
7.80E+00
9.32E+01
NOAA Biological
Effects Levels
(me/ke)
ER-L [ ER-M
NCA
NCA
NCA
2.00E-03
NCA
NCA
6.50E-02
3.40E-01
NCA
NCA
3.30E+01
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
3.50E+01
NCA
1.50E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.50E-02
NCA
NCA J
6.70E-01
2.10E+00
NCA
NCA
8.50E+01
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.10E+02
NCA
130E+00
NCA
NCA
ER-L
Hazard Quotient
Average ._
NE
NA
NE
7.05E+00
NE
NE
8.35E+01
1.01E+01
NE
NE
8.85E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.67E+00
NE
1.18E+00
. NE
NE
Maximum
NE
NA
NE
l.OOE+Ol
NE
NE
l.OOE+03
U2E+02
NE
NE
1.46E+00
NE
NE
NE
NE
3.40E+00
NE
3.00E-fOO
NE
NE
ER-M
Hazard Quotient
Average
NE
NA
NE
9.40E-01
NE
NE
8.10E+00
1.63E+00
NE
NE
3.44E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
5.33E-01
NE
1.37E-01
NE
NE
NE
NA
NE
1.33E+00
NE
NE
9.70E+G1
1.81E+01
NE
NE
5.68E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.08E+00
NE
3.46E-01
NE
NE
NCA = No criteria available.
NA = Not applicable.
NH = Not evaluated due to lack of data or applicable criteria.
"Concentration is a calculated interstitial water concentration (ug/1.).
"Value is a median effect concentration (ECjg) based on a 21 da Da
'Contaminant was not detected above background.
..
y Daphnia magna study.
MKOI\RrT:(H>628026.004W.1r
-------
Table 28
Comparison of Interstitial Water Concentrations
Upper Graf ton Ditch Sediment and Toricity Values
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Location
Station 8063
Station 8042
Station 8043
Station 8077
Chemical
Bis(2-ethyihexyl) phthalate *
2-Butanone *
. Di-n- butyl phthalate
4,4'-DDE
Toluene *
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate *
2-Butanone *
4,4'-DDE
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
_ , • •
Toluene
Interstitial Water
Concentrations
fat/U
5.79E-02
1.64E+02
1.11E+00
239E-04
1J8E+00
1.84E-01
1.29E+02
3.59E-05
1.21E+00
3.67E+03
2.14E+03
526E-01 '
Ton'city
Values
fo/U
3.00E+00
1.02E+06
3.00E+00
1.05E+03
1.30E+04
3.00E+00
1.02E+06
1.05E+03
3.00E+00
1.10E+02
6.20E+02
1.30E+03
Hazard
Quotient
1.93E-02
1.61E-04
3.72E-01 1
L_ 228E-07
1.21E-04
6.14E-02
U6E-04
3.42E-08
4.02E-01
333E+01
3.46E+00
4.05E-04
'Chemical was included although it was not detected above background concentrations.
MK01\RPT:00628026.00«z3rd_t29.wk3
A-54
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 29
Alternatives Retained for Detailed Analysis
Stage 4, Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Detailed
Evaluation
Alternatives
Initial
Screening
Alternatives
Description
MM-1A
SC-1A
No Action.
MM-1B
SC-1B
Limited action/institutional controls/land use restrictions on the
Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
3A
MM-2A
SC-2
Asphalt cap over soil and excavation of sediment with off-base
disposal; GMZ maintenance through groundwater collection and
intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption at two treatment facilities; subsurface
groundwater recharge; and land restrictions on the Zone 3 area to
prohibit future residential use.
36
MM-2A
SC-3A
Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal; GMZ
maintenance through groundwater collection and intrazonal
treatment using greensand filtration, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption at two treatment facilities; subsurface groundwater
recharge; and land restrictions on the Zone 3 area to prohibit
future residential use.
MM-1B
SC-4
Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal; source area
groundwater collection and intrazonal treatment using greensand
filtration, air stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment
facilities; subsurface groundwater recharge; and land restrictions on
the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
MM-3A
SC-3A
Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base disposal; GMZ
maintenance with additional contaminant removal through
groundwater collection and intrazonal treatment using greensand
filtration, air stripping, and carbon adsorption at a single treatment
facility; subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use restrictions
on the Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
MM-2A
SC-4
Excavation of soil and sediment with off-base treatment and/or
disposal; source area and GMZ maintenance through groundwater
collection and intrazonal treatment using greensand filtration, air
stripping, and carbon adsorption at two treatment facilities;
subsurface groundwater recharge; and land use restrictions on the
Zone 3 area to prohibit future residential use.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-55
09/11/95
-------
Table 30
Alternatives Retained for Detailed Analysis'
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Remedial Alternative
1. No action.
2. Limited ectjon/inatitiitioiial controla/amd m» leetricttom on the Zone 3 eree
lo proUbil future) reaidential nee.
JA. AJphekeerovwwUeiidexMvetioaofLeedinienlwilhoff-BeeednpoMl;
tiling traMMad fifcntion. air Mripp.nt, and carbon wUoipbofi at two
3B. Exe>vMkmofioHMdMdiawMwilhoff-beM
-------
Table 31
Selection of Groundwater Cleanup Goals - Organics
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
l!
'(
! Chemical
j Benzene
Bcnzoic acid
bisC2 - ethvlhexyhphthalate
jn-Butylbenzene
sec-Buivlbenzene
ten - Buivlb enzene
• Chlorobenzene
'• Chloroform
• Chloromethane(MethyJ Chloride)
: 1.2-Dichlorobenzene
1 .3 - Dichlorobenzene
'' 1.4 -Dichlorobenzene
! Dichlorodifluoromethane
1.1 — Dichloroethane
,1.2-Dichloroethane
1 1.1-Dichloroethene
i cis - 1 .2 - Dichloroethene
trans - 1 .2 - Dichloroethene
Dimethyl phthalate
2.4-Dimethylphenol
Di - n - butvlphthalate
Echylbenzene
Isopropylbenzcne
4 - Isopropyl toluene
2 - Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)
4-Methvlphenol
Naphthalene
PAHs
Acenaphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Pvrene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
n-propylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1.2,4- Trichlorob enzene
1.1.1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene '
Trichlorofluoromethane
1.2,4- Trimethvlbenzene !
1.3.5-Trimethvlbenzene
Vinyl Chloride
Xvlenes f total") !
[
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Cug/L)
12.000 J
5
720
40
17
3
1.200
7.3
300
2
40
7.4
0.6
54.4 J
7.1 J
21.7
11,000
32.000
20
110 J
32__
30,000
80
24
4900 J
70 J
230
1.700 J 1
75 J
110 J
59 J
35 J
6 J
390
100
50
6.100
2
13 J
777 .332
7
590
140 _,
9.600 J
2.600 J i
Selected
Risk -Based
Remedial
Objective*
(ug/U
1.47
146.000
6.08
NTV
7.3
7.3
146
983
4.41
1.010
NTV
1.85
1.460
1.830
0.468
0.11
183
365
365.000
730
3.650
2.700
88.1
NTV
13.4
1.830
1831
13.4
2.190
1.460
13.4
1.100
0.71
21.900!
NTV
1.58
2.650
84.2i
NTV
5.01:
4380
19.8
NTV
0.0387!
36.500 '
Selected
Groundwater
Regulatory- Based
Remedial
Objective
rug/U
5
28.000
6
NA
NA
NA
100
100
3
. 600
600
75
1.000
81
5
7
70
100
NA
NA
34.000
700
NA
NA
NA
350
350
20
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
. 4.000
NA
5
1.000!
701
200
5!
2.000
NA
NA
2
10.000
1
Selected
Groundwater
Cleanup
Goal
rug/u
5
NA
6
NA
7.3
NA
100
NA
3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5
7
70
100
NA
NA
NA
700
NA
NA
13.4
NA
NA
20
NA
NA
13.4
NA
1
NA
NA
5
1.000
NA
NA
51
NA
NA
NA
21
NA
Basis of
Groundwater
Cleanup Goal
Selection
MCL
NA
MCL
NA
Risk
NA
MCL
NA
NHDPHS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MCL
MCL
MCL
MCL
NA
NA
NA
MCL
NA
NA
Risk
NA
NA
NHDPHS
NA
NA
Risk
NA
MCL
NA
* NA
MCL
MCL
NA
NA
MCL
NA
NA
NA
MCL
NA
!|
i|
r
i;
l!
1
'i
II
II
;l
|i
j,
I:
i'
l!
ii
|>
l|
1
!•
•i
,'
'i
i
!'
!•
.!
1
:i
i
•
•Risk-based remedial objectives presented in Subsection 2.3 of the Zone 3 Draft Final FS Report.
3 = Estimated detected value.
MCL=Maxiumum Contaminant Level. May 1993.
NHDPHS=New Hampshire Department of Public Health Services. February 1993.
NA = Not applicable.
NTV = No loxicity value available. Therefore, the exposure route(s) could not be evaluated quantitatively.
Risk = Cleanup goal based on Risk-Based Remedial Objective.
MKO l\RIT:0062«026.00«\l3rd.t32.wk3
A-57
22-AUIL-95
-------
Table 32
Selection of Groundwater Cleanup Goals — Inorganics
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical |
Aluminum
Arsenic (V/III)
Barium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium (VI/IH)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Delected
Concentration
(Filtered)
(mg/L)
0.687
0.182
0.17
0275
53
219
0.102
0.097
0.22
. ^ _
0.0159
70.4
14
0.000.1
0.075
119
ND
12.8
147
0.0533
0535
Maximum
Concentration
From Background
Locations
(Filtered)
(mg/L)
0.393
0.023
0.0883
0.111
ND
73.2
ND
ND
ND
0.584
0.024
18.9
0.942
ND
0.328
7.06
ND
6.4
10.2
ND
0.168
Selected
Risk -Based
Remedial
Objective
(mg/L)
N'FV
0.0000487
2.56
3.29
0.0183
NTV
0.183 (VI)
NTV
1.35
NTV
0.0106
NTV
0.183
0.011
0.73
NTV
0.183
NTV
NTV
0.256
11
Selected >
Groundwater
Regulatory- Based
Remedial
Objective
(mjj/L)
NA
0.05
2
0.62
0.005
NA
0.1
NA
1.3
-NA
0.015
NA
0.2
0.002
0.1
35
0.05
NA
NA
0.02
2
Selected
Groundwater
Cleanup
Goal
(mg/L)
0.393
0.05
NA
NA
0.0183
NA
0.1
NA
NA
NA
0.015
NA
0.942
NA
NA
35
NA
NA
NA
0.02
. ..MA.
Basis of
Groundwater
Cleanup Goal
Selection
Background
MCL
NA
NA
Risk
NA
MCL
NA
NA
NA
MCL
NA
Background
NA
NA
NIIDPHS
NA
NA
NA
LHA
NA
NA=Not applicable.
ND - Anaryte not delected.
NTV=No toxicity value available. Therefore, the exposure route(s) could not be evaluated quantitatively.
LHA=Lifetime Health Advisory, May 199.3.
MCL=Maxiumum Contaminant Level, May 1993.
NHDPHS=New Hampshire Department of Public Health Services, February 1993,
MKOI\RPT:0062«>260
-------
Table 33
Soil Cleanup Goals
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Soil Cleanup Goal
(mg/kg)
Basis for Cleanup Goal
Site 33
Inorganics
Arsenic
1525
Background
Site 38
Organics '
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
039
4.6
0.45
Leaching*
Teaching
I -caching
Site 39
Organics
Trichloroethene
0.12
I >».yrhing
Inorganics
Manganese
623
Background
'Cleanup goals based on leaching were calculated using the Summers leaching model.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-59
09/11/95
-------
Table 34
Ecological—Based Remedial Objectives
Upper Newfields Ditch Sediment
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
fl
Ij
ji
il Chemjcal
Maximum
Detected
Upper Newfields
Ditch
NOAA
Criteria
ER-L ! ER-M
Maximum
Concentration
Detected at
Background
Location
il
i!
Cleanup Goal ]j
Upper Newfields ;•
Ditch . ij
I Orzmks (tag/kg)
Total PAHs
Metals (me/kg)
AlumiDum
i Arsenic
i| Barium
'Beryllium
Boron
(ICadimum
Calcium
!l Chromium (Total)
Cobalt
; Copper
: Iron
i Lead
', Magnesium
Manganese
'. Mercury
(Nickel
' Potassium
Silicon
| Sodium
Thallium
[ Vanadium
IZiac
5.73
14,900
441
526
4.6
121
12
14,700
97.4
103
55.6
87,900 J
304
4,980
1330
0.44
139 J
4,110
8340
762
28.6 J
165
659
4
NCA
33
NCA
NCA
NCA
5
NCA
80
NCA
70
NCA
35
NCA
NCA
0.18
30
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
J20
35
NCA
85
NCA
NCA
NCA
9
NCA
145
NCA
390
NCA
110
NCA
NCA
13
50
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
270
8.94
14300
122
52.5
0.83
ND
ND
3300
53
14.4
23.2
21900
42.1
6450
358
0.2
46.7
2840
4840
542
ND
35.7
105
NC ;
i
i NC
33
NC !
NC
NC
5
NC
80)
NC
NC 1
NC
42.1
NC
NC
0.2;
46.7
NC
NC
NC 1!
NC
NC i
120 ;
All concentrations presented in mg/kg.
J » Estimated detected value.
NC=No clenaup goal required.
NE=Not evaluated.
NS-Not selected due to areawide use of pesticides within Zone 3.
NCA* No criteria available.
NA«=Not applicable.
ND=Not detected.
MK01\RPT:0062S026.00*z3rd G5.wk3
A-60
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 35
Ecological—Based Remedial Objectives
Upper Grafton Ditch Sediment
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Maximum
Detected
Upper Grafton
Ditch
NOAA
Criteria
ER-L ! ER-M
Maximum
Concentration
Detected at
Background
Location
Cleanup Goal
Upper Grafton
Ditch
Organics (mz/kz)
Total PAHs ! 103
Metals (tog/kg)
Aluminum
[Arsenic
! Barium
1 Beryllium
• Calcium
Chromium (Total)
' 41 35
8.94 i 8.94
II
i.
19,700 Jl NCA i NCA
483
103
1.8
8150
373
i Cobalt 23.1
i Copper 1 35 5
'Iron
'Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
26,700 J
119
5,510
1.120
! Mercury 1 0.45 .
Nickel i 443
: Selenium 1 7.8
i Sodium 1670
! Vanadium 93.2
; Zinc 78.6 :
33 85
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA ! NCA
• 801 145
NCA | NCA
70 390
NCA
35
NCA
NCA
0.18
30
NCA
NCA
NCA
120
NCA
110
NCA
NCA
13
14300
122
52.5
0.83
3300
53
14.4
232
21900
42.1
6450
358
0.2
50 46.7
NCA ND
NCA ' 542
NCA
35.7
270 i 105
NC
33
NC
NC
NC
NC i
NC
NC
NC
42.1
NC
NC
0.2'
NC
NC
NC •
NC
NC
J = Estimated detected value.
NC = No cleanup goal required.
NE = Not evaluated.
NCA = No criteria available.
NA = Not applicable.
ND = Not detected
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rd_l36.wk3
A-61
22-Aug-95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Media
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwaler
Requirement
CUBICAL sfpcinc
I
PEDERAL-SDWA-Maximum
Cbnlamiiunt Levels (MCI*)
(40 CPR 141.11 - 141.16)
FEDERAL-SDWA-Maximum
Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs)
(40 CFR 141.50 - 141.51)
FEDERAL-RCRA-Examptef of
Concenlralkms Meeting Criteria for
Action Levels (40 CPR 264521,
Appendix A)
FEDERAL-EPA Health Advisories
(HAs)
Requirement Synopsis
MCLs have been promulgated for a number of
common organic and inorganic contaminants.
These levels regulate the contaminants in
public drinking water supplies, but may also be
considered relevant and appropriate for
gfoundwaler aquifer* potentially used for
drinking water.
MCLGs are non-enforceable health goals for
public water systems. MCLGs are set at level*
that would result in no known or anticipated
advene health effects with an adequate margin
of safely.
These proposed, nonenforceabte health-based
groundwater protection standards are
established for 146 toxic compounds. While
not yet promulgated, these standards are used
as guidance for RCRA Corrective Actions.
HAs are nonenforceabk health-based
standards established for various exposure
durations (i.e., 1 day. 10 days, and lifetime).
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
Extracted groundwaler will be treated
using oxidation, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption to attain MCLs
prior to discharge. Tables 31 and 32
groundwaler. Under this alternative,
cleanup goals will be attained within
30 years.
Non-zero MCLGs were considered
when selecting groundwater cleanup
goals. Extracted groundwater will be
treated using oxidation, air stripping,
and carbon adsorption to meet these
standards. Tables 31 and 32 of the
ROD present cleanup goals for
groundwater.
RCRA action levels were considered
in selection of cleanup goals. Tables
31 and 32 of the ROD present
cleanup goals for groundwaler.
Extracted grounowaler will be treated
using oxidation, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption to meet these
standards.
HA* were considered when selecting
groundwater cleanup goals. Tables 31
and 32 of the ROD present cleanup
goals for groundwater. Extracted
groundwater wiH be treated using
oxidation, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption to meet these standards.
Status
Relevant and
Appropriate
Relevant
and
Appropriate
TBC
TBC
MK01\KPr:OU628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-62
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
band Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Groundwaler,
Surface Water,
Sediment, Soil
Groundwater,
Surface Water,
Sediment, Soil
Groundwaler
Groundwaler
Requirement
FEDERAL-EPA Risk Reference
Doses (RfDs)
FEDERAL-ERA Carcinogen
Assessment Group Potency Factors
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
410.03, 410.04 and 410.05
Groundwater Quality Criteria and
Groundwater Protection. Standards
STATE-NII Admin. Code Env-Ws
316-318 New Hampshire Primary
Drinking Water Criteria
Requirement Synopsis
RfDs are dose levels developed based on
noncarcinogenic effects and are used to
develop Hazard Indices. A Hazard Index of
less than or equal to 1 is considered acceptable.
Potency Factors are developed by the EPA
from Health Effects Assessments or evaluation
by the Carcinogenic Assessment Group and are
used to develop excess cancer risks. A range of
10"4 to 10'7 is considered acceptable.
New Hampshire Groundwater Quality Criteria
(410.03) require that all groundwater of the
stale shall be suitable for drinking, shall not
contain regulated contaminants in excess of the
standards (410.0S) and shall not cause
discharges to surface water in excess of surface
water quality standards. The standards, which
are derived from MCLs and other EPA and
NH health-based limits, protect quality of
ambient groundwater. Exemptions from
groundwater quality criteria (410.04) include
areas designated as GMZs.
NH MCLs and MCLGs establish levels of
contaminants allowable in public -water supplies
and are used as cleanup standards for aquifers
and surface water bodies that are potential
drinking water sources. They are generally
equivalent to SDWA MCl_s.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
BPA RfDs were used to characterize
risks due to exposure to contaminants
in groundwater, soil, surface water,
and sediment.
EPA Carcinogenic Potency Factors
have been used to compute the
individual incremental cancer risk
resulting from exposure to site
contamination in groundwater, soil,
surface water, and sediment.
To the extent they are more stringent
than MCLs, these standards were used
to set cleanup goals for groundwater
as presented in Tables 31 and 32 of
the ROD.
NH MCLs and non-zero MCLGs were
used as ;>j nropriatc to determine
cleanup goals for contaminants of
interest in groundwater as presented
in Tables 31 and 32 of the ROD.
Extracted groundwater will be treated
to meet cleanup goals.
Status
TBC
TBC
Applicable
Relevant and
Appropriate, to the
extent these
standards are more
stringent than MCLs
and MCLGs.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-63
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy - Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Soils, Sediment
RMfttlinMCfll
FEDERAL-CWA-AmWent Water
Quality Criteria (AWQC) Protection
of Freshwater Aquatic Life and
Human Health
STATE-MI Admin. Code Env-Ws
432 Surface Water Quality Standard*
(SWQSX RSA 48SA:8
FEDBRAL-NOAA Technical
Memorandum
NOS OMA 52
LOCATION SPECIFIC
FBDERAL-16 USC 469A-1,
Archaeological and Historic
Preservation Act
Requirement Synopsis
AWQC are developed under the dean Water
Act (CWA) as guidelines from which states
develop water quality standards. A more
slrmpnt AWQC for aquatic life may be found
relevant and appropriate rather than an MCL,
when protection of aquatic organisms is being
considered at a site.
Surface water classification standards for Class
B waters are applicable to the site. New
Hampshire Surface Water Quality standards
for tone poNulants in Class B waters are
essentially the same as Federal Ambient Water
Quality Criteria.
Identifies contaminant concentration levels at
which biological effects are first observed in
aquatic species in estuarine environments.
Provides for the preservation of historical and
archaeological data that might be lost due to
alteration of terrain. Requires data recovery
and preservation.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
AWQC for aquatic life have been
considered in development of
sediment cleanup foals. Sediments
exceeding cleanup goals will be
excavated.
SWQS have been considered in the
goals. Sediments exceeding cleanup
goals will be excavated.
These levels would be attained by
removal of contaminated sediments
from the zone in excess of ckanup
goals.
If artifacts are encountered during
excavation activities, these measures
will be taken.
Status
Relevant
and
Appropriate
Relevant and
Appropriate, to the
extent more stringent
than federal AWQC.
TBC
Applicable
MK01\RJT:00628026.004\z3rodap»
A-64
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
l>and Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Wetlands
Wetlands
Wetlands
Wetlands
Wetlands
Requirement
FEDERAUExecutive Older 11990
Protection of Wetlands. 40 CPR Part
6 - Appendix A
FEDERAUCWA Section 404; 40
CFR Part 230 & 33 CPR 320-330
FEDERAH6 USC 661 el seq., Pish
and Wildlife Coordination Act
STATE-RSA 485:A-17 NH Admin.
Code Env-Ws 415, Rules Relative to
Prevention of Pollution from
Dredging, Filling, Mining,
Transporting, and Construction
STATE-RSA 482-A, NH Admin.
Code Env-Wt 300. 400. 600, New
Hampshire Criteria and Conditions
for Fill and Dredging in Wetlands
Requirement Synopsis
Under this Order, federal agencies are required
to minimize destruction, loss, or degradation of
wetlands, or beneficial values of wetlands.
40 CFR 6, Appendix A contains the EPA policy
for carrying out the provisions of EO 11990.
Requirements regulate the discharge to a
wetland of dredged or fill material and require
mitigation for any such discharge.
Requires actions to be taken to avoid adverse
effects, minimize potential harm to fish or
wildlife, and preserve natural and beneficial
uses of the land.
Establish criteria for conducting any activity in
or near surface water, which significantly alien
terrain or may otherwise adversely affect water
quality, impede runoff, or create unnatural
runoff.
Regulate filling and dredging in or adjacent to
wetlands and establish criteria for protection of
fish, wildlife, commerce, and public recreation.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
Remedial activities will minimize harm
to wetlands to the extent possible.
Appropriate federal agencies
(identified under this Act) will be
contacted and allowed to review the
proposed work plan prior to soil
excavation and groundwater extraction
and treatment as applicable to
wetlands within Zone 3.
Sediment and soil excavation and
construction of extraction wells and
recharge trenches will be conducted so
as to avoid any such discharge.
Relevant federal agencies will be
contacted to help analyze effects of
remedial action on wildlife in the
wetlands in Zone 3. Remedial
activities will be conducted to
minimize adverse impacts.
Erosion control measures will be taken
during soil/sediment excavation.
Areas excavated will be backfilled and
regraded.
Proposed work adjacent to the
wetlands will comply with stale
wetland protection requirements.
Status
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\7.3rod.apa
A-65
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Gronndwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Growdwater
Hazardous Waste
HuankNU Waste
Hazardous Waste
Requirement
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
378. Site Selection of Wells for
Community Water Systems
ACTION SPECIFIC
FRDERAI^RCRA 40 CFR Part 264
— Standards Applicable to Generators
of Hazardous Waste
FEDERAL-RCRA 40 CFR 264.90-
264.101 A 26S.90-26S.94 (Subpart F)
Releases from SoNd Waste
Management Unit*
RSA Ch 147A-NH Hazardous Waste
Management Act and Hazardous
Waste Rules, Env-Wm 100-1000.
Requirement Synopsis
standards for siting of new wells that will
supply community water systems. They
establish protective radii around wetts in which
certain activities are prohibited. In addition,
they establish a wellhead protection area within
which an inventory of contamination sources
must be performed and a contamination
management program must be developed.
RCRA Sublitk C establishes standards
applicable to treatment, storage, transport, and
disposal of hazardous waste and the closure of
hazardous waste facilities.
General facility requirements for groundwaler
monitoring at affected facilities and general
required at regulated facilities.
Standards for management of hazardous waste
facilities. Operate in lieu of federal RCRA
Subtitle C requirements.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
The Haven wed is the source of
drinking water for Pease AFB and is a
potential drinking water source for the
City of Portsmouth. Groundwaler
extraction and reinjection will be
conducted such that the Haven well
will not be adversely impacted.
Management of hazardous waste as
part of CERCIA response must
comply with substantive requirements
of these regulations, lias effect
through state hazardous waste
requirements which operate Hi lieu of
federal regulations. See discussion of
NH hazardous waste requirements
below.
Groundwaler monitoring and
treatment would be conducted in
accordance with these requirements.
Soil and groundwaler at the site
contain listed hazardous waste from
degreasHig activities. Actions to be
taken are listed separately below.
Status
Relevant and
Appropriate
Relevant and
Appropriate
Relevant and
Appropriate
See following
sect ion-by-section
analysis
MK01\RFT:00628026.0D4\z3rod.apa
A-66
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy - Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Requirement
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
353.09 and 353.10 Siting
Requirements for Hazardous Waste
Facilities
STATE-NII Admin. Code Env-Wm
400-404 - Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste
STATE-NH Admin Code Env-Wm
702.08 - Environmental and .Health
Requirements
STATE-NH Admin Code Env-Wm
702.09 - General Design
Requirements
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
702.10-702.14, Monitoring of
Hazardous Waste Treatment
Facilities
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
707.03 - Waste Pile Requirements
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
708.02 Operation Requirements
Requirement Synopsis
Imposes restrictions on where hazardous waste
facilities can be located.
Requirements for identification and listing of
hazardous waste.
Requires operator of a hazardous waste facility
to meet certain standards for surface water,
groundwaler, and air.
All hazardous waste treatment and transfer
facilities are to meet specified design
requirements.
Requirements for installation and operation of
one or more of the following monitoring
systems:
• Groundwater monitoring network.
• Air emission monitoring network.
• Leachate monitoring network.
Incorporates by reference the requirements of
40 CFR 264, Subpart L governing waste piles.
Establishes requirements that must be met
when operating a hazardous waste facility.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
The groundwater treatment system
will comply with these requirements.
Excavated soils and/or sediments and
treatment residues will be analyzed to
determine whether they are hazardous
prior to disposal.
Treatment of groundwater will be
conducted to meet these standards.
The groundwater treatment facility will
be designed in accordance with these
requirements.
During groundwater treatment,
groundwater and air emission
monitoring networks consistent with
this regulation would be developed
and implemented.
The excavated soils and sediments
stockpiled at the site prior to off-site
disposal will comply with these
requirements.
Groundwater treatment facility will
operate in accordance with these
requirements.
Status
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
MKOI\RFT.00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-67
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Soil*, Sediments
Orotmdwater
Requirement
STATB^NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
708.03 Technical Standards for
Facilities with Standard Permits
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
708.03 Additional Technical
Standards; Treatment Standards
FEDERAiyGuidance on Remedial
Actions for Superfund Sites with PCB
Contamination,* OSWBR Directive
No. 9355.4-01 (August 1990)
FEDERAI^SDWA, Underground
Injection Control Program, 40 CFR
Parts 144 and 146
Requirement Synopsis
New Hampshire Regulations incorporate
federal technical standards for hazardous waste
treatment facilities.
Oeacrai requirements for selection of
treatment methods. Treatment method must
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• Render the waste nonhazardous.
• Render the waste safe for handling and
transport.
• Make the waste amenable for recovery or
reuse.
• Render the waste more amenable to long-
term storage.
• Reduce the volume of the hazardous waste.
Establishes recommended action levels for soil,
groundwater, and sediments containing PCB
contamination. Action levels are based on
expected future use of the site. Unlike Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA), which only
applies to media containing >SO ppm PCBs,
this guidance applies to aH PCB contamination,
regardless of concentration.
This regulation was established to protect
underground sources of drinking water from
endangerment by injection of fluids through
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
The design and operation of the
groundwater treatment system would
comply with the relevant portions of
these regulations.
Groundwater treatment using
oxidation, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption would achieve one or more
of the identified requirements .
PCBs delected in soils and sediments
do not exceed 50 ppm. This guidance
will be used in determining the action
levels for PCB-contaminated soils and
sediments based on a non-residential
scenario.
As treated groundwater is proposed to
be recharged to the subsurface, these
requirements would be followed.
Status
Relevant and
Appropriate
Relevant
and
Applicable
TBC
Relevant and
Appropriate
MK01\KFr:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-68
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
(Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Groundwater
Uroundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Requirement
FEDERAl^Mefhods for Monitoring
Pump and Treat Performance
(EPA/600/R-94/123)
STATE-We 604 Abandonment of
Wells
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
410.07 and 410JO(c), Prohibited
Discharges
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
410.26 - Groundwater Management
Zone
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
410.30 and 410.31
Requirement Synopsis
Provides guidance for monitoring the
effectiveness and efficiency of pump and treat
systems.
Imposes requirements for closure of wells.
Section 410.07 prohibits discharge of
wastewater exceeding the 410.05 standards to
groundwater, or any discharge to the ground or
groundwater that would result in a violation of
surface water quality in adjacent surface waters.
Section 410.10(c) requires that such discharges
be treated by best available technology.
These regulations require establishment of a
GMZ at sites with contaminated groundwater
that exceeds Groundwater Quality Criteria.
These provisions establish the methods for
sampling and monitoring groundwater.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
A pump and treat monitoring plan will
be developed that describes the
monitoring objectives, types of
measurements to be made,
measurement locations, methods,
procedures, equipment, schedules, and
reporting requirements.
If groundwater wells are no longer
needed, the closure requirements will
be met.
Treated groundwater discharged on-
site will comply with these
requirements. Groundwater treatment
via oxidation, air stripping, and carbon
adsorption will prevent discharge of
contaminants to surface water above
state standards. Treatment goals are
presented in Table 31.
A GMZ will be established.
Institutional controls such as deed
restrictions will be imposed to control
the use of groundwater within the
GMZ.
Groundwater will be sampled and
monitored in accordance with these
requirements to ensure that
groundwater quality outside the GMZ
is not degraded.
Status
TBC
Applicable
Applicable
Substantive
requirements are
applicable.
Substantive
requirements are
applicable.
MK01\RPT:U0628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-69
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greenland Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Groundwater
Air
Air
Air
Air
Requirement
STATE-N1I Admin. Code Bnv-Ws
Parts 430-437, Surface Water
Classification USA 485-A:12
FBOERAL-RCRA 40 CFR Part 264,
SubparlAA
FEDERAL-RCRA 40 CFR Fart 264,
SubpartBB
FEDERAURCRA 40 CFR Part 264,
SubpartCC
FEDERAL-EPA Policy on Control of
Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers - OSWBR Directive 9355.0-
28
Requirement Synopsis
Prohibits the disposal of wastes in any manner
that would lower the quality of surface water
below the minimum requirements of its surface
water classifications.
Contains air emission standards for process
vents associated with various treatment
processes including air ttrippinf. Applies to
facilities that manage hazardous wastes with
organic concentration* of at least 10 ppmw.
leaks at hazardous waste treatment, storage.
specifications and monitoring requirements.
Applies to equipment contacting wastes with at
least 10% organic* by weight.
Contains proposed air emission standards for
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities using
tanks, surface impoundments and containers to
manage hazardous wastes containing at least
500 ppmw VOCs.
Provides guidance on the control of air
emissions from air strippers used at Superfund
sites for groundwaler treatment.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
Treated groundwater discharged on-
site will comply with these
requirements.
conducted to meet these standards.
Groundwater treatment facility will be
constructed, maintained, and
monitored as required.
Emissions from excavated soils and
sediments will be monitored and
controlled prior to off-site disposal.
Emissions from air stripper will be
monitored and controlled, as
necessary.
Status
Applicable
Applicable, if organic
concentrations in
waste are equal to or
greater than 10
ppmw.
Applicable, if organic
concentrations in
waste are equal to or
greater than 10% by
weight.
TBC, if at least 500
ppmw VOCs.
TBC
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-70
09/15/95
-------
Table 36
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation or Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Requirement
FEDERAL-CAA- 40 CFR Part 61
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESIIAPs)
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-A
1300 Toxic Air Pollutants
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-A 800
Testing and Monitoring Procedures
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-A
1002 Fugitive Dust Control
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-A
1204 Control of VOC Emissions
STATE-NH Env-A 50S.02(a),
Emergency Procedures
Requirement Synopsis
Sets maximum emission standards for 189
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs).
Established Ambient Air Limits (AALs) to
protect the public from concentrations of
pollutants in ambient air that may cause
adverse health effects.
Identifies procedures that must be followed for
the testing of air emissions from stationary
sources.
Requires precautions to prevent, abate, and
control fugitive dust during specified activities,
including excavation, construction, and bulk
hauling.
Specifies VOC emission control methods and
establishes limitations on VOC emissions for
various industries.
Imposes obligations on sources of air pollution
in case of emergency.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements
At least two HAPs, benzene and vinyl
chloride, have been detected at the
site. Releases of these contaminants
to the air during groundwater
treatment and soil excavation will be
monitored and controlled to ensure
that they do not exceed emission
levels.
Release of contaminants to the air
from any on-site remedial action will
not result in exceedance of the
respective AAL, if one exists.
During groundwater treatment and
soil excavation, air emissions would be
monitored and tested to ensure that
these sources do not exceed applicable
standards.
Precautions to control fugitive dust
emissions would be required during
remedial activities.
Control equipment will be used during
soil/sediment excavation and
groundwater treatment to ensure that
VOC emissions do not exceed
limitations.
Will comply with directions of slate in
case of "warning* status.
Status
Relevant
and
Appropriate
Applicable
Applicable
Applicable
Relevant
and
Appropriate
Applicable
MKOI\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apa
A-71
09/15/95
-------
Table 3*
ARARs for the Selected Remedy — Excavation of Soil and Sediment With Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal;
Source Area and GMZ Maintenance through Groundwater Collection and Intrazonal Treatment Using Greensand Filtration,
Air Stripping, and Carbon Adsorption at Two Treatment Facilities; Subsurface Groundwater Recharge; and
Land Use Restrictions on the Zone 3 Area to Prohibit Future Residential Use
Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
(Continued)
Media
Air
Requirement
FEDBRAlxCKA Region 1
menKpaMtwn, 12 July 1909 from
Look Gtto 10 Merrill & Hohman
Requirement Synopsis
Stales that Svperf und air strippers in ozone
iton-afUmmenl ire»s generally merit controls
on *ll VOC emissions.
Action To DC Taken To
/*. • Ilequiremenis
Air stripper win include controls to
reduce VOC emissions.
Status
TBC
MKOI\RJTOCK,2«0260W\/:»r
-------
APPENDIX B
DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\2one3rod.fm 08/23/95
-------
State of New Hampshire
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
NHDES 6 Ha2en Drive> P'°' B°X 95> Concord' NH 03302-0095
603-271-3503 FAX 603-271-2867
TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
September 18,1995
Mr. Alan K. Olsen
Director, Air Force Base Conversion Agency
1700 North Moore Street, Suite 2300
Arlington, VA 22209-2802
Re: Record of Decision for Zone 3 Declaration of Concurrence
Pease Air Force Base Super-fund Site
Dear Mr. Olsen:
The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has reviewed and concurs with
the "Record of Decision, Zone. 3" (Zone 3 ROD) for the Pease Air Force Base Superfund
Site, located in Newington and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The Zone 3 ROD was drafted
by the Air Force in accordance with the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1986 (CERCLA) to document the Zone 3
remedy selection and all facts, analysis and site specific policy determinations related to
the selection of the remedy. The preferred remedy for Zone 3 has the following
components:
• Excavation and off-base disposal of RCRA and non-RCRA soil from Zone 3,
thereby eliminating leaching of contaminants from soils to groundwater.
• Excavation and off-base disposal of sediments from the drainage ditches in
Zone 3, thereby reducing receptor exposure to the sediments and preventing
any possible desorption from the sediments to surface water.
• Groundwater extraction to control the migration of the dissolved contaminant
plumes in Zone 3, and groundwater extraction to provide containment and
contaminant mass removal for several source areas within Zone 3.
• Institutional controls which would prevent exposure to contaminated
groundwater, including (I) establishment of a GMZ; (ii) land use restrictions
- on groundwater use within Zone 3; and (iii) deed restrictions prohibiting
certain constructions activities in source areas within Zone 3.
. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE REMEDIATION POLICY
Prior to Pease Air Force Base (PAFB) becoming a Superfund site, and as a party to the
"Pease Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120" (Pease FFA), the
AIR RESOURCES DIV. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIV. WATER RESOURCES DIV. WATER SUPPLY & POLLUTION CONTROL DIV.
64 No. Main Street 6 Hazen Drive 64 No. Main Street P.O. Box 95
P.O. Box 2033 Concord. N.H. 03301 P.O. Box 2008 Concord. N.H. 03302-0095
Concord. N.H. 03302-2033 Tel. 603-271-2900 Concord. N.H. 03302-2008 Tel 603-271-3503
Tel. 603-271-1370 FAX 603-271-2456 Tel. 603-271-3406 FAX 603-271-2181
FAX 603-271-1381 FAX 603-271-7894
-------
Letter to Alan K. Olsen
Re: Zone 3 ROD Declaration of Concurrence
September 18,1995
Page 2
Department has been actively involved in the oversight of the Air Force's environmental
response activities at Zone 3 and has worked with the Air Force to ensure consistency with
State regulations and policies. When the Department reviews RODs it verifies that the
RODs are generally consistent with the approach the Department would require for similar
sites in the State of New Hampshire, regardless of their Superfund status. The following
discussion examines in detail the equivalency of the Zone 3 remedy with our approach
under Env-Ws 410 to groundwater remediation at similar sites.
ZONE 3 ARARs DETERMINATION AND ENV-WS 410 BACKGROUND
As discussed in the Zone 2 ROD Declaration of Concurrence letter, the Department and
EPA-New England reached a productive compromise for the implementation of Env-Ws
410 as an ARAR at PAFB. The Department accepted EPA's Env-Ws 410 ARARs
determinations for PAFB RODs and EPA-New England agreed that the PAFB RODs would
include language that addresses the portions of Env-Ws 410 not designated as ARARs.
In particular, criteria to determine the effectiveness of the remedy were to be addressed in
the body of the RODs to ensure long-term protection of the groundwater.
The following text discusses the substantive requirements of Env-Ws 410 and then explains
the approach utilized in the ROD to implement these requirements. Evaluation of the
ROD'S implementation of the substantive requirements of Env-Ws 410 is a crucial element
of the Department's concurrence analysis because consistency with Env-Ws 410's
approach ensures: 1) consistency with the State Remediation Policy and 2) successful
implementation of the Env-Ws 410 ARAR compromise.
Env-Ws 410 APPROACH AND THE ZONE 3 ROD
Env-Ws 410 contains rules that establish statewide groundwater quality standards and
provides an exemption from these standards under certain conditions. Additionally, Env-
Ws 410 allows the scope and aggressiveness of remedial actions to be selected based on
the resource value and use of the groundwater. Under Env-Ws 410, a GMZ is established
to manage the use of contaminated groundwater until ambient groundwater quality
standards are met. The relevant requirements of Env-Ws 410 applicable to the Zone 3
remedy are as follows?-
e GMZ Establishment: Env-Ws 410.26 requires the establishment and containment
of contaminated groundwater within a Groundwater Management Zone (GMZ) when
violations of Groundwater Quality Standards are present.
e Source Area Treatment. Removal or Containment: Env-Ws 410 requires that
sources of continuing groundwater contamination must be either treated or removed
and, if treatment or removal are not feasible, the source must be contained.
-------
Letter to Alan K.OIsen
Re: Zone 3 ROD Declaration of Concurrence
September 18,1995
Page 3
• Groundwater Restoration: The remedial action must restore groundwater quality to
meet the groundwater quality criteria contained in Env-Ws 410.03. A high priority
is given to source control, high value groundwaters or groundwater that will or is
being used as a water supply.
• Establishment of Performance Standards: Final and interim objectives and criteria,
including specific performance standards are established for the remedial actions.
If the remedial actions do not meet the performance standards, additional action
may be required.
• Long Term Monitoring of the GMZ and Remedy Performance: Env-Ws 410 requires
monitoring of the performance of remedial systems and GMZ boundary compliance.
• Groundwater Management Permit: A groundwater management permit is required
to establish a GMZ. The Groundwater Permit delineates the GMZ and defines the
steps that must be taken to implement source area remedial actions and specifies
performance standards for the remedial system, etc.
• Institutional Controls: Env-Ws 410.20 requires notification to all landowners within
the Groundwater Management Zone within 30 days of Groundwater Permit
approval. Env-Ws 410.21 requires that the permit holder record notice of the permit
in the registry of deeds for each lot within the groundwater management zone. Env-
Ws 410.26(e) requires that use of groundwater be controlled by either ownership of
the overlying land or deeded use to the exclusive right to use the groundwater within
the GMZ unless an alternate water supply is available.
The Zone 3 ROD implements these requirements in the following fashion:
• GMZ Establishment: The ROD includes Env-Ws 410.26 as an ARAR; tNs provides
for the establishment of a GMZ and containment of groundwater contamination
within the GMZ.
• Source Area Treatment. Removal or Containment: Based on a review of the
available data, the selected remedy will either excavate or hydraulically contain all
significant source areas in Zone 3.
• Remedial Action Plan: The FS/ROD steps of the CERCLA process and the
environmental monitoring plan provisions are functionally equivalent to Env-Ws
410's requirements for a Remedial Action Plan.
-------
Letter to Alan K.OIsen
Re: Zone 3 ROD Declaration of Concurrence
September 18,1995
Page 4
e Establishment of Remedy Performance Standards: The ROD requires development
of performance standards for the remedial actions within the Environmental
Monitoring Plan.
• Long Term Monitoring of the GMZ and Remedy Performance: The description of
the Environmental Monitoring Plan in the ROD provides for monitoring of the
performance and effectiveness of the remedial actions as well as the groundwater
quality at the GMZ boundary.
e Eventual Achievement of Groundwater Quality Standards: The ROD includes Env-
Ws 410's numerical groundwater quality standards as an ARAR and the NCP
requires that these standards be met within a reasonable time frame (March 8,1990
Federal Register, p. 8732). The requirement that groundwater quality will be
restored within the reasonable time frame of the NCP is functionally equivalent to
Env-Ws 410's expectation that groundwater quality will eventually be restored.
e Groundwater Permit: The Air Force has voluntarily agreed to supply the information
necessary to obtain permits to ensure that the substantive requirements of
regulations are met. This ensures that substantive portions of Env-Ws 410 permit
protocols are met.
e Institutional Controls: The Statutory Determination section of the ROD requires the
establishment of "Institutional controls which would prevent exposure to
contaminated groundwater."
Based on the successful implementation of the Env-Ws 410 ARAR compromise, the Zone
3 ROD is consistent with the approach that would be required to meet our groundwater
remediation approach at similar sites within the State.
After the remedy is implemented, the long term monitoring plan will ensure future
consistency with Env-Ws 410's substantive requirements and other key ARARs. A
comprehensive, detailed review of all environmental monitoring data will be conducted on
a periodic basis by the Air Force, EPA-New England and the Department in order to ensure
that the remedial action provides adequate protection of human health and the environment
and complies with applicable regulations.
-------
Letter to Alan K.OIsen
Re: Zone 3 ROD Declaration of Concurrence
September 18,1995
Page 5
STATE CONCURRENCE
The Department, acting on behalf of the State of New Hampshire, concurs that the selected
remedy, described in the ROD, satisfies the requirements of CERCLA.
truly yours,
Robert W. Varney
Commissioner
cc: Carl W. Baxter, P.E., DES-WMEB
Gary S. Lynn. P.E., DES-WMEB
Anne Renner, Esq., NHDOJ-AGO
Michael J. Daly, EPA
Arthur L. Ditto, P.E., AFBCA
James Siiyder, AFCEE
-------
APPENDIX C
RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.fm 08/23/95
-------
APPENDIX C
RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
OVERVIEW
The Air Force issued the Zone 3 Proposed Plan to the public in June 1995. In the Zone
3 Proposed Plan, the Air Force identified its preferred alternative for the 12 sites that make
up Zone 3. The selection of this preferred alternative by the Air Force was coordinated
with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), New England Region, and the New
Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES).
The following subsections describe the background on community involvement with Zone
3 activities, and the Air Force's response to comments received during the Zone 3 Proposed
Plan public comment period of 12 July to 11 August 1995.
BACKGROUND ON COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Prior to the start of the public comment period for the Zone 3 Proposed Plan, the Air Force
issued a fact sheet that summarized the content of the Zone 3 Proposed Plan. Presentations
on the status of work being conducted and results of the work in Zone 3 were made to the
Pease Air Force Base Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee
(RAB/TRC). Additionally, the content of the Zone 3 Proposed Plan was presented to and
discussed with the members of the RAB/TRC. Notifications announcing the beginning of
the Zone 3 Proposed Plan comment period were mailed to all individuals on the Pease AFB
mailing list in June 1995. A news release was also issued to the media announcing the
beginning of the Zone 3 Proposed Plan comment period. Newspaper announcements
(advertisements) were published in two local newspapers the weekend prior to the public
hearing date of 3 August 1995. It is noted that the public comment period and public
hearing for Zone 3 ran concurrently with that of Site 32/36. Proposed remedial actions for
Zone 3 and Site 32/36 were presented simultaneously to the public.
. MK01\RPT:0062S026.004\zone3rod.apc 1 09/15/95
-------
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING COMMENT PERIOD AND THE AIR
FORCE RESPONSES
No written comments were received during the public comment period. Verbal comments
were provided by three individuals at the public hearing on 3 August 1995 as follows:
ZONE 3 COMMENTS/RESPONSES
1. Comment: I think the principal concern of the City as a whole has about
remediation in this site lies in the fact that there is an underground
water resource located at which wells (municipal water supply) are
located, either directly under Zone 3 or in a nearby vicinity. The
protection of municipal wells for the long term use of residents in the
city as a drinking water supply is our primary concern. In that regard,
any remediation measure really needs to be measured against that
standard. Even a short-term interruption of the use of the wells would
be problematic for the City. And, an institution of long-term
groundwater controls, for example, would be items that would concern
us.
Response: The Air Force is also very concerned about protecting the Haven well
and other base wells and ensuring their future long-term use.
Additionally, EPA, New England Region, and NHDES are concerned
about the Haven well and have required the Air Force to include
protective measures for the Haven well in the various Zone 3 remedy
alternatives. The selected remedy includes measures to protect the
future use of the Haven well. Also included in the selected remedy
are monitoring requirements to ensure the actions remain protective.
As part of the remedy, it will be necessary to limit the rate the Haven
well can be pumped. However, the rate will not have a negative effect
on reasonable usage of the Haven well.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.»pc
09/15/95
-------
2. Comment: I'm with EOS Research, Ltd. We are the technical advisors to the
SCOPE group. I just want to mention that we (SCOPE) generally
concur with the conceptual approach that has been presented by the
Air Force for both Zone 3 and Site 32/36. We do feel, however, that
probably the most difficult part is yet to come. And that is ensuring
that the actual implementation of these new conceptual plans is
brought forward in a technically appropriate manner. With that in
mind, we would like to continue our involvement on a technical basis
with the Air Force, the EPA and the NHDES in working out the
details, particularly in regard to Site 32/36, where we are dealing with
extraordinarily complex technical issues that cannot really have the
questions answered in a forum like this.
We feel that one of the approaches that should be followed during
design and monitoring phase is sort of a learn-as-you-go approach.
And we feel that by implementing the conceptual actions that are
being proposed, you can learn a lot in the process. And you should
not have any expectations that all your questions will be answered
prior to the actual implementation. So we encourage the Air Force to
maintain a certain amount of flexibility in going into this
implementation phase. And we also encourage the regulatory agencies
involved to keep that in mind, that you may not have all the questions
answered before hand.
Response: The Air Force acknowledges SCOPE'S concurrence with the
conceptual approach for remedial actions at Zone 3 and Site 32/36
presented by the Air Force. The Air Force welcomes SCOPE'S
continued involvement with the Pease environmental program and
believes that SCOPE'S input to the Site 32/36 remedial action design
development can be very constructive. The Air Force concurs with
SCOPE'S learn-as-you-go approach for remedial action implementation
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.apc
09/15/95
-------
and will work with EPA and NHDES to use that approach for Zone
3 and Site 32/36.
3. Comment: SCOPE is—again, we concur with the overall proposal in both Zone 3
and Site 32/36.
Response: Concurrence acknowledged.
4. Comment:
Response:
5. Comment:
One way SCOPE kind of gets a feeling of. assurance is that, in the
documents, the Air Force has put in writing items such as, under Zone
3 preferred remedial action alternatives, that they are going to
establish land use restrictions beneath Building 227 (Site 39) and
remediation of the soils would be required if the building is removed.
That's a pretty substantial undertaking because if that building is
removed—that the Air Force is going to come back and do the cleanup.
The Air Force will remain responsible for management of its (Air
Force's) contaminated soil left in place under Building 227. The main
purpose of these restrictions is to ensure that an unknowing party does
not remove the building, resulting in a potential for a release of the
contaminated soils to the environment. In the event that it is decided
to remove Building 227, these restrictions will ensure that a plan is
developed prior to removal, to address any exposed contaminated soils.
While I'm on Zone 3, you've got construction of recharge trenches
southwest of the runway for discharge of treated groundwater. Could
you expand on that, just where are they going to be. Where would the
water eventually end up once the contaminated water that has been
cleaned to drinking water standards is put back into the earth, in those
recharge trenches.
NOC01\RPT:00628026.004\iooe3nxUpc
09/15/95
-------
Response: The recharge trench will be located approximately 2,200 feet north of
the south end of the runway and 500 feet west of the centerline of the
runway. The treated water that is recharged to these trenches will be
absorbed back into the existing water table in the general area of the
trenches. Groundwater flow in this area is in a westerly direction.
6. Comment: On Site 31, Building 244, it says here under your cleanup activities to
date that the tank was cleaned, cut into sections, and sent to an off-
base disposal facility. I was concerned because it says it was cut into
sections. Was that a tank that was similar to the tank at Building 113?
Was it a concrete tank, or was it some kind of a metal tank that was
removed.
Response: The tank that was removed from Building 244 was concrete, the same
type as was at Building 113. A better choice of words would have
been to state the tank was broken up into sections for off-base
disposal.
7. Comment: Building 226, which is the old waste water treatment plant, the
industrial waste water treatment plant — if you could expand on that
a little bit because there were two oil water separators. One was
external to the building. And I think there was another one that was
internal to the building. Now, was waste solvents, waste water that was
sent over from Buildings 119 and 227 — were they processed through
Building 226, or were they just processed through the external waste
- water treatment plant. I think one came before the other, and I'm not
too clear on what happened there — if they maybe closed down 226
and then went to the external oil water separator in its place.
Response: The last conclusion of the commentor is correct. Originally,
wastewater was processed through Building 226. Around 1974 the
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zone3rod.apc
09/15/95
-------
8. Comment:
treatment process was changed where wastewater only went through
the external (to Building 226) oil/water separator and the Building 226
treatment system was no longer used.
At Building 227, which is the big hanger [sic], one question there. Is
the site clean up complete? I know a few years ago, you put in a
vapor extraction system. And I'm not sure if that's closed down and
if that area has been cleaned up or not. Or is that going to be used in
the future?
Response: A pilot, or treatability study, system was installed in the grass area at
the southwest corner of Building 227 in the fall of 1991. This pilot
system was used to evaluate the potential of using a dual phase (both
liquids and vapors) vacuum system for cleanup of a "hot spot* in that
particular area of Site 39 (Building 227). Results of the study
indicated that the dual phase process was not a viable option and the
pilot system was dismantled in late 1992. Excavation of soils in the hot
spot area will be conducted as part of the Zone 3 remedy.
9. Comment:
On that issue (Long Term Monitoring), I think it's important to those
in Washington that pay the bills that an Air Force presence needs to
be present here at Pease for a liaison between the City of Portsmouth,
the Town of Newington, organizations such as SCOPE, so that the
community does not have to go to Washington to say, hey, things aren't
going right up at Pease.
It's like when you want money to stay local. I like to spend my money
locally because the money stays locally. The same with the Air Force.
If you stay here, there is a presence here. We can come to you and
say hey, this is not working. You're going to have to use some more
aggressive remedial actions in order to clean this thing up. Or, get
MK01\RPTK»628026.004\zone3rod.»pc
09/15/95
-------
with your people down there. You're not spending enough money.
You're not taking care of the problem.
If there is an Air Force presence here, we can go right to you. We
don't have to go to Washington. So that, I think, is as important as
monitoring these sites to make sure that the contaminants are not
migrating further out than what we already have them contained in.
i
Response: The Air Force agrees the long-term monitoring and the associate
interfacing with the public will be and is a very important part of the
remediation process. The current plans are for the Air Force to
maintain a physical presence at Pease Air Force Base during the long-
term monitoring process.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3rod.apc / 09/15/95
-------
APPENDIX D
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zone3nxJ.fm 08/23/95
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX
FOR THE
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM
PEASE AIR FORCE BASE
NEW HAMPSHIRE
SEPTEMBER 1995
-------
ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE
Under section 113(k) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the U.S. Air Force is required to establish an administrative
record file for every Superfund response action and to make a copy of the administrative
record available at or near the site.
Due to funding and space limitation, and based on guidance received from EPA
Region I, the Air Force has established one administrative file for Pease Air Force Base
which encompasses environmental response actions base-wide. Since access to Pease is
unrestricted, both the information repository and the administrative record file are housed
on base. Although similar in nature, the information repository contains general information
about the Air Force's Installation Restoration Program while the administrative record
documents the specific decision-making process leading to response actions.
Although draft documents are not usually placed in an administrative record, the Air
Force and EPA Region I decided to temporarily house draft documents in the Pease
administrative record. Draft documents in the administrative record are pulled and replaced
with final documents as soon as the final documents are available. The Air Force and EPA
Region I believe that this policy allows for an overall more complete administrative record.
The administrative record serves two purposes, according to EPA guidance. First the
record contains those documents which form the basis for the selection of a response action
and under section 113(j) of CERCLA judicial review of any issue concerning the adequacy
of any response action is limited to the administrative record. This does not mean that only
documents which support a response decision are placed in the record. Relevant documents
that were considered but ultimately rejected are also included in the record to better
establish the decision-making process.
Second, CERCLA section 113(k) requires that the administrative record act as a
vehicle for public participation. Participation by interested citizens ensures that the
concerns of the public will be addressed during the response selection process. The
administrative record file must be reasonably available for public review during normal
business hours. The record file should be treated as a non-circulating reference ^document.
This will allow the public greater access to the volumes and also minimize the risk of loss
or damage. Individuals may photocopy any documents in the non-confidential portion of
the file.
Major documents in the Pease Air Force Base administrative record are shelved by
specific zone. For example, documents pertinent to Zone 1 are shelved together and are
kept separate from documents pertaining to other zones. Documents relevant to all zones
are together in a general area and are shelved in accordance with the structure of the
administrative record. In addition, the administrative record index is cross-referenced to
facilitate the location of documents related to specific zones.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd D-l 09/18/95
-------
The documents in the administrative record file may become lost or damaged during
use. If this occurs, contact the administrative record file manager at Pease Air Force Base.
Documents may be added to the administrative record file as site work progresses. This
index will be updated quarterly to reflect documents added to the administrative record file.
The administrative record file will be maintained in Building 43 at Pease AFB.
Questions and/or comments about the administrative record file should be directed to:
Arthur L. Ditto, Remedial Project Manager
Air Force Base Conversion Agency
Operating Location A, Building 43
61 International Drive
Pease AFB, NH 03803-0157
(603) 430-2586
«Bdo»^e««^^
MK01\RPTK»0628(C6.004\23K)dJpd D-2 09/18/95
-------
ABOUT THE INDEX NUMBERING SYSTEM
Document Number
Comprised of a 3 letter site code (PEA), the category number,
the entry number and the page range of a document. (Both
page numbers will be the same for a one page document.) If
documents are eventually placed on a microfiche system, the
document number consists of the site code followed by the
microfilm reel and frame number.
Example: PEA (1.1) #1 001-031
Site Code
PEA
(Category #)
(1.1)
Entry #
Page Range
001-031
Long Title
Author
Recipient
Date
Type
Second Reference
Location
The long title and brief description of document.
Indicates author or primary originator of document. If a
contractor prepared the document, indicates company
and location.
Indicates primary recipient of document.
Indicates date document was issued.
Indicates document type
Other categories pertaining to the document.
Exact location(s) of document.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-3
09/18/95
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE STRUCTURE
1.0 SITE IDENTIFICATION
1.1 Background - RCRA and other Information
12 Notification/Site Inspection Reports
13 Preliminary Assessment (PA) Report
1.4 Site Investigation (SI) Report
1.5 Previous Operable Unit Information
1.6 Correspondence
2.0 REMOVAL RESPONSES
2.1 " Sampling and Analysis Plans
2.2 , Sampling and Analysis Data / Chain of Custody
2.3 EE/CA Approval Memorandum (Non-Time-Critical Removals)
2.4 EE/CA (Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis)
2.5 Action Memorandum
2.6 Amendments to Action Memorandum
2.7 Removal Response Reports
2.8 Correspondence
3.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI)
3.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)
3.2 Sampling and Analysis Data/Chain of Custody Forms
3.3 Work Plan
3.4 Preliminary RI Field Work Reports
3.5 Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports
3.6 Correspondence
4.0 FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS)
4.1 ARAR Determinations
4.2 Feasibility Reports
4.3 Proposed Plan
4.4 Supplements and Revisions to the Proposed Plan
4.5 Correspondence
5.0 RECORD OF DECfsION (ROD)
5.1 ROD
52 Amendments to ROD
53 Explanations of Significant Differences
5.4 Correspondence
\OC01\RFT:00628026.004\z3io
-------
6.0 STATE AND FEDERAL COORDINATION
6.1 Cooperative Agreements/SMOAs
6.2 Federal Facility Agreement (FFA)
6.3 Coordination - State/Federal
6.4 General Correspondence
7.0 ENFORCEMENT
7.1 Enforcement History
7.2 Endangerment Assessments
7.3 Administrative Orders
7.4 Consent Decrees
7.5 Affidavits
7.6 Documentation of Technical Discussions/Response Actions
7.7 Notice Letters and Responses
8.0 HEALTH ASSESSMENTS
8.1 ATSDR Health Assessments
8.2 Toxicological Profiles
8.3 General Correspondence
9.0 NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
9.1 Notices Issued
9.2 Findings of Fact
9.3 Reports
9.4 General Correspondence
10.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
10.1 Comments and Responses
10.2 Community Relations Plan
10.3 Public Notice(s) (Availability of the Admin. Record File,
Availability of the Proposed Plan, Public Meetings)
10.4 Public Meeting Transcripts
10.5 Documentation of other Public Meetings
10.6 Fact Sheets, Press Advisories, and News Releases
10.7 Responsiveness Summary
10.8 - Late Comments
10.9 . Technical Review Committee Charter
10.10 Correspondence
MK01\RPT:00628026.0W\z3rodjp
-------
11.0 TECHNICAL SOURCES, GUIDANCE, AND PROCEDURES DOCUMENTS
11.1 EPA Headquarters Guidance
11.2 EPA Regional Guidance
11.3 State Guidance
11.4 Air Force Guidance
11.5 Technical Sources
11.6 Proposed Procedures/Procedures
11.7 Correspondence
*Note: Guidance documents listed as bibliographic sources for a document already included in the
Administrative Record are not listed separately in this index.
12.0 CONFIDENTIAL FILE
12.1 Privileged Documents (Extractions)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3to
-------
LI Background • RCRA and Other Information
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (1.1) #1 001-031
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
LOCATION:
Scope of Work for the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
USAF
EPA, NHDES
April 1991
Scope of Work for RI/FS
SECOND REFERENCE None
ARF.IR
L2 Notification/Site Inspection Reports
'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
L3 Preliminary Assessment (PA) Report
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (13) #1 001-068
Phase n Problem Confirmation and Quantification Presurvey Report (Field Sampling for SI Work)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF Occupational and Environmental Health Lab (OEHL), Brooks AFB, TX
June 1984
Technical Report
None
ARF.IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (13) #2 001-182
Installation Restoration Program Records Search for Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
CH2MHU1
EPA; NHDES; USAF Engineering & Services Center, Tyndall AFB; SAC, Offutt AFB, NE
January 1984
Technical Report
None
ARF.IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (13) #3 001-041
Preliminary Assessment Stage 3B IRP, Pease AFB, New Hampshire (Updated PA Report)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF; EPA; NHDES
20 July 1990
Letter Report
None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
PEA (13) #4 001-U
Final Preliminary Assessment Report. Portsmouth Refuse to Energy Plant
ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
286 Congress Street, 7th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
USAF
November 1991
Report
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-7
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE: None
LOCATION: ARF. IR
14 Sto Invtstifrfm (SI) Report
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (1.4) #1 001-309
Installation Restoration Program, Phase II - Confirmation/Quantification Stage I, Volume I, Final Report for Pease
Air Force Base, New Hampshire
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
HQ SAC/SGPB, Offutt AFB, NE; EPA; NHDES
August 1986
Technical Report: Field Investigations
None
ARF, IR
#
PEA (1.4) #2 001-883
Installation Restoration Program, Phase II - Confirmation/Quantification Stage 1, Volume n, Appendices
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
HQ SAC/SGPB, Offutt AFB, ME; EPA; NHDES
August 1987
Technical Report: Field Investigations
None
ARF, IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.4) #3 001-308
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3B Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection for Pease Air Force Base, New
Hampshire - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; HQ SAC/DE, Offutt AFB, NE AFSC HSD/YAQ, Brooks AFB, TX
February 1991
Technical Report: Also includes review of PA
None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (1.4) #4 001-088
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Final Portsmouth Refuse to Energy Plant Site Inspection Report for Pease AFB, NH
ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
286 Congress Street, 7th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
USAF
Jury 1992
Report
None
ARF.IR
_ #
PEA (1.4) #5 001-D
Final Portsmouth Refuse to Energy Plant Site Inspection Report Appendices for Pease Air Force Base
ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
USAF
Jury 1992
Appendices
None
ARF
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxLapd
D-8
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.4) *6 001-B17
Pease AFB Railroad Tracks (Site 46) Site Investigation Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
24 September 1992
Letter Report
PEA (1.6); Site 46
ARF.IR
#
L5 Previous Operable Unit Information
'NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
L6 Correspondence
PEA (1.6) #1 001-002
Comments Regarding the Installation Restoration Program, Phase I Record Search Report, Pease Air Force Base
The State of New Hampshire, Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission
USAF, HQ SAC Offutt AFB, ME
16 March 1984
Letter/Comments
None
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) #2 001-004
Comments Regarding the Installation Restoration Program Report (09/10/86)
State of New Hampshire, Division of Public Health Services
NH Division of Public Health Services
24 November 1986
Comments to SI (1.4)
None
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) « 001-005
Comments Regarding the Phase II, Stage 1IRP Report (08/86 Draft)
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
3 February 1987
Comments to SI (1.4)
None
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) #4 001-007
Air Force Responses to Comments From the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services on the Phase
II, Stage 1 IRP Draft Report
USAF
NHDES
8 May 1987
Responses to Comments to SI (1.4)
None
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-9
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) *6 001404
Letter Concerning Site Walkovers made with Members of Sherburne Civic Group
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
18 July 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
*
PEA (1.6) #7 001-001
Submittal of Site 42 Site Inspection Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
28 Jury 1992
Letter
Site 42
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) #8 001-001
Railroad Track SI Letter Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA;
Richard Pease, NHDES
30 September 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER,-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) #10 001-002
Zone 3 Water Hardness at Pease AFB, NH
Lee dePenia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
25 May 1994
Letter with Attachment
Zone 3
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
*
PEA (1.6) #14 001-001
Locations of Surface Waters of New Hampshire in the Vicinity of the Former Pease Air Force Base
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
3 March 1994
Letter
Pickering Brook
ARF (Section 1.6 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-10
09/18/95
-------
2.1 SampKi^g and Analysis Plans
•NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
22 Sampling and Analysis Data / Chain of Custody
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
2-3 EE/CA Approval Memorandum (Non-Time Critical Removals)
•NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
IA EE/CA (Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis)
•NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
2*5 Action Memorandum1
•NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
16 Amendments to Action Memorandum
• NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
2.7 Removal Response Reports
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (2.7) #3 001-142
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 3, Informal Technical Information Report, Soil Removal at IRP Site 34
(Building 222) - Pre-NPL Actions
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES
January 1991
Technical Report
Site 34
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE; -
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (2.7) #4 001-244
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 3, Informal Technical Information Report, Soil Removal at Site 32 (Building
113) - Pre-NPL Actions
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPAjNHDES
April 1991
Technical Report
Site 32
ARF
*
PEA (Z7) #8 001-601
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 3B, IRP Site 32/36, Groundtvater Treatment Plant. Informal Technical
Information Report, Pease AFB, NH, Appendix K - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Report
Site 32/36
ARF, Site 32/36 Shelf
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-ll
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
REOPffiNT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (2.7) #9 001-J.4
Installation Restoration Program, Stafe 3B, IRP Site 32/36, Groundwater Treatment Plant, Informal Technical
Information Report, Pease AFB, NH, - Technical Report and Appendices A-J - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Report
Site 32/36
ARF, Site 32/36 Shelf
#
PEA (2.7) #10 001-D4
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3B, IRP Site 34, Groundwater Treatment Plant. Informal Technical Report,
Pease AFB, NH, Appendices A-D - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1992
Report
Site 34
ARF, Site 34 Shelf
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (2.7) #11 001-808
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3B, IRP Site 34, Groundwater Treatment Plant, Informal Technical
Information Report, Pease AFB, NH, Appendices E-G - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1992
Report
Site 34
ARF, Site 34 Shelf
*
i> ComspoadtKt
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (2Ł) #1001-002
Tank Removal at Building 244
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
8 March 1989
Letter
BMg.244
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (18) #2 001-002
Review Comments Regarding Site 32/36 Groundwater Remediation Pilot Contract Document and Specifications
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF -
25 September 1990
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
PEA (2Ł) #4 001-003
IRP Site 32/36 Recovery WeU Update
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxUpd
D-12
09/18/95
-------
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE;
LOCATION:
1 November 1990
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (2.8) #5 001-005
Letter Regarding Anticipated Effluent Quality from Groundwater Treatment Plants at Sites 32/36
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
5 November 1990
Letter
Site 34; Site 32/36
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (2.8) #7 001-004
Corrected Tables for 5 November 1990 letter, 'Anticipated Effluent Quality from Groundwater Treatment Plants at
Sites 32/36 and 34
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
3 December 1990
Letter
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER PEA (2.8) #9 001-002
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Letter Regarding Review of a Supplemental Proposal to Air Strip Contaminated Groundwater
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services .
USAF
13 September 1989
Letter
None
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER PEA (2.8) #12 001-002
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Letter to the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Regarding Amendments to Groundwater
Treatment System Air Emissions
USAF
NHDES
20 August 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER PEA (2.8) #13 001-041
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR -
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
New Hampshire wetlands permit for National Priorities List (NPL) Related Work Site 32/36
USAF
State of New Hampshire
22 August 1990
Permit
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodapd
D-13
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (18) #14 001402
Request for Additional Information Regarding Pilot Groundwater Treatment Systems for Areas of Concern 32/36
and 34
NHDES
USAF
11 January 1991
Request for Information
Site 32/36, Site 34
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
PEA (18) #15 001-001
Letter to New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services regarding pilot groundwater treatment system for
IRP Sites 32/36 and Site 34
USAF
NHDES
24 January 1991
Letter
Site 32/36, Site 34
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (18) #16 001-005
Letter Regarding Notification of Intent to Discharge Effluent From Two Pilot Groundwater Treatment Systems
USAF
NHDES
EPA
10 December 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION-
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (18) #17 001-002
Letter to U.S. EPA regarding pilot groundwater treatment systems for IRP Sites 32/36 and Site 34
USAF
EPA
24 January 1991
Letter
Site 32/36, Site 34
ARF (Section 18 Binder)
#
PEA (18) #18 001-001
IRP Site 34, Groundwater Treatment Plant
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
13 August 1992
Letter
PEA (rt Site 34
ARF (Section 18 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
PEA (18) #20 001-001
Pease AFB Site 32/36 Groundwater Treatment Plant Informal Technical Information Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
14 October 1992
Letter
MK01\RPT:00628026-004\z3nxL»pd
D-14
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (2.7); Site 32/36
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (2.8) #21001401
Pease AFB Site 34 GWTP Informal Technical Report Advance Copy
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
19 October 1992
Letter
PEA (2.7); Site 34
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (2.8) #22 001-007
Notification of Treatment of Extraction Water from Building 227
USAF
NHDES, Water Supply and Pollution Control Division
26 November 1991
Letter
Bldg. 227
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (2.8) #25 001-003
Surface Water and Sediment Background Values
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
4 March 1994
Letter with Attachment
Section 2.2
ARF (Section 2.8 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-15
09/18/95
-------
3.1 Sampling and Anar/sis Flan (SAP)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #1 001-210
Quality Assurance Project Plan, Integrated Installation Restoration Program, Staje 2, to Support the Preliminary
Remedial Investiption Field Work, Labelled Stage 2 Field Work
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; HQ SAC/DEPV, Offutt AFB, NE
November 1987
Quality Assurance Project Plan
None
ARF
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #2 001-212
Quality Assurance Project Plan, Integrated Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
August 1989
Quality Assurance Project Plan
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #3 001-286
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
January 1991
Sampling and Analysis Plan
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (3.1) #4 001-045
IRP Health Assessment Sampling and Analysis Plan (Buildup 244, 229, and 226) - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA NHDES
April 1991
Sampling and Analysis Plan
None
ARF
*
PEA (3.1) *5 001-006
Site 39 Aquifer Test Procedure Plan for Bedrock Well 39-6080
Robert J. Casper, Project Geologist
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenne
US. Air Force/Peace AFB
15 OctoWr 1992
Letter with Table and Map
Zone3
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
• *
PEA (3.1) *6 001-005
Pumping Tests at Site 32/36
Amy E. Bruckner, P.O.
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
MK01\RrT:00628026.004\z3ro
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Arthur Ditto
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
22 January 1991
Letter with Tables and Map
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #7 001-003
Locations of Background Sampling Locations
Arthur L. Ditto, RPM
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, RPM, EPA;
Richard Pease, RPM, NHDES
15 June 1992
Letter and Map
Stage 3C Background Data Base
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #9 001-001
Horizontal Drilling Technique (Video)
Lee R. dePersia, Task Manager
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, RPM
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
28 September 1992
Letter
Horizontal Wellbore System
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder) '
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #10 001-003
Zone 3 Pumping Tests
Robert J. Casper, Project Geologist
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenzie
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
28 September 1992
Letter and Table
Zone 3
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #11 001-R1
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3, Pease AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Addendum
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.1) #12 001-005
Site 72 Aquifer Test Proposed for Bedrock Well 72-6051
Robert J. Casper, Project Geologist
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenzie
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-17
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
1 October 1992
Letter with Table and Map
Zone 3
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTILE '
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION.
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) #13 001-004
Site 31 Aquifer Test Plan for Lower Sand Well 31-518
Jame* G. Spratt, Project Geologist
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenrie
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
1 October 1992
Letter with Table and Map
Zone 3
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
#
PEA (3.1) #14 001-005
Site 39 Aquifer Test Plan for Lower Sand Well 39-5101
Robert J. Casper, Project Geologist
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mart McKenrie
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
15 October 1992
Letter with Table and Map
Site 39
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
#
PEA (3.1) #17 001-005
Ethyiene Dibramide (EDB) Analysis Using Modified Method ES04.1
Edward S. Barnes, P.E, CI.H.
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Capt Carl Woerhle
U.S. Air Force/Base Closure Division
Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
19 November 1992
Letter with 4 Page Attachment
Analytical Method Recommended for EDB Analysis
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
#
PEA (3.1) #19 2J4-R1
Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan, Addendum #3, QAPP Portion
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
2 December 1992
Addendum
None
ARF -
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
PEA (3.1) #21 001-002
Submittal of Construction Quality Plan (CQP) and Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for Ditch Maintenance
Mark McKenae, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
Mike Daly, EPA
21 June 1994
Letter
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodJpd
D-18
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Newfield's Ditch, Giafton Ditch, Flagstone Brook, Mclntyie Brook, Paul's Brook
ARF (Section 3.1 Binder)
3.2 Sampling and Analysis Data / Chain of Custody forms
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.2) #1 001-027
Volatile Aromatics/Halocarbons by Modified 8010/8020 - Draft Data Sheets
Roy F. Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Unknown
Data
None
ARF (Section 3.2 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.2) #2 001-018
Volatile Aromatics/Halocarbons by Modified 8010/8020
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Unknown
Data
None
ARF (Section 3.2 Binder)
#
PEA (32) #3 001-009
CLP Volatile Organic Analysis, Case No. 15175, SDG No. AX086, 8 Water Analytical Results
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Unknown
Data
None
ARF (Section 32 Binder)
#
PEA (3.2) #4 001-037
Pease AFB GWTP Summary Tables
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Unknown
Data
None
ARF (Section 32 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT: ""
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.2) #5 001-013
Split Sampling Results Site 8 and Site 34
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, USAF
29 October 1990
Data
Site 8; Site 34
ARF (Section 3.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (3.2) #6 001-013
Preliminary Survey of Metal Concentrations in New Hampshire Soils - Final Report
New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services, Bureau of Health Risk Assessment
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-19
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
USAF
May 1991
Data
None
ARF (Section 3.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE-
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.2) #7 001-D1
Background Soluble Meals Concentrations for Groundwater at Pease AFB
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
20 November 1991
Letter Report
PEA (3.6)
ARF
#
PEA(3.2)#&001-E1
Tolerance Limits for Background Soils at Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
17 April 1992
Letter Report
None
ARF
*
PEA (32) #10 001-002
Results of Background Surface Water/Sediment Location Walkover
Arthur L. Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
19 August 1992
Letter
Knights Brook
ARF (Section 3.2 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION.
PEA (3.2) #11 001-004
Haven Well Test
James G. Spntt, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenzie, USAF
21 August 1992
Letter
Haven Well Aquifer
ARF (Section 32 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (12) #12 001-052
Maximum Detected Concentrations for Unfiltered Groundwater at Pease AFB, NH
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, inc.
Arthur Ditto, USAF
25 August 1992
Letter with Attachments (Tables and Graphs)
None
ARF (Section 3.2 Binder)
#
PEA (3.2) #13 001-007
Haven Well Pumping Test Data
Jim Spntt, Project Geologist
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3«xUpd
D-20
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenzie, USAF
16 September 1992
Letter with Tables
Haven Well (597)
ARF (Section 3.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.2) #15 001-009
Tissue Sample Letter Report for Great Bay, Bass Pond and Mclntyre Brook
Lee R. dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Through U.S. Air Force
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
9 October 1992
Routing Letters and Letter Report with Map and Table
Great Bay, Bass Pond
Mclntyre Brook
ARF (Section 32 Binder)
33 Work Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER; PEA (3.3) #1 001-144
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Work Plan for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
August 1989
Work Plan
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION-
PEA (33) #^ 001-019
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Treatability Study Work Plan: IRP Sites 8 and 34
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
May 1991
Work Plan
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #3 001-B.4
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C Action Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
May 1991
Operations Plan
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
PEA (33) #4 001-258
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 4 Work Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
January 1991
Work Plan
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-21
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE None
LOCATION: ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.3) 4>5 001-213
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
LOCATION:
Work Plan for the Integrated Installation Restoration Program. Stage 2. Labelled Stage 2
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
September 1987
Work Plan
SECOND REFERENCE None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTOE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (33) *6 001-GU2
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum 1. Pease AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1991
Addendum
None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) #7 001-G5
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum Number 2 for Pease AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1992
Addendum
None
ARF, IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #8 001-B4
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C Operations Plan for Pease AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1991
Plan
None
ARF, IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #9 001-3.5
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Work Plan Addendum 3, Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, IDC.
USAF
June 1992
Addendum
None ~
ARF.IR
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3KxUpd
D-22
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTOE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (33) # "01 ;
Groundwate: .od ••• L Process Outline
Lee dePersia .coy K Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto USAF
2 October 1992
Letter
Groundwater Modeling
ARF (Section 33 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) #15 001-F
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Interim Monitoring Plan
USAF
Pease AFB
January 1994
Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Monitoring
ARF (Zone 7 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #16 001-4.1
Work Plan to Evaluate the Sediments of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone
Brook, Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
27 October 1993
Work Plan
Mclntyre Brook; Flagstone Brook
ARF (Section 33 Bindei)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #18 001-R.l
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base Standard Operating Procedure for Well
Abandonment
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1994
Work Plan
None
ARF
#
3.4 Preliminary RI Field Work Reports
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.4) #1 001-173
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
Interim Technical Report No. 1 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume I, for Pease Air Force Base
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
February 1988
Technical Report
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.4) #2 001-147
Interim Technical Report No. 1 for the Installation Restoration Program. Stage 2, Volume II - Appendices • Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-23
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
January 1988
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTItE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) « 001-214
Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
August 1988
iCCnPIOl RftpOft
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECON REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #4 001496
Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume II - Appendices (Sample
Tracking Information, Analytical Results)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
*
PEA (3.4) #5 001-838
Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume III - Appendices (Analytical
Results)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
*
PEA (3.4) *6 001-722
Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume IV - Appendices (Analytical
Results)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices (Analytical Results)
None
ARF
*
PEA (3.4) #7 001-289
Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume V - Appendices (Field
Geological, Geoteehnical. and Hydrogeological Data)
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
*
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-24
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG HUE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #8 001-106
Interim Technical Report No. 3 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
February 1989
Technical Report
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.4) #9 001-658
Interim Technical Report No. 3 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume n - Appendices
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA: NHDES; USAF
February 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.4) #10 001-198
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume I — Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
April 1989
Technical Report
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #11 001-770
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume n - Appendices
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA: NHDES; USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.4) #12 001-568
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume m - Appendices - Draft
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE "~
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #13 001-770
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume IV - Appendices - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-25
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.4) #14 001-1,150
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR,
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume V - Appendices - Draft
Roy F. Wetton, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
*
PEA (3.4) #15 001-729
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume VI - Appendices - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.4) #16 001-803
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume VII - Appendices - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
April 1989
Technical Report * Appendices
None
ARF
#
PEA (34) #17 001-251
Instillation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
Jury 1990
Technical Report
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.4) #18 001-452
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Volume II
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
Jury 1990
Technical Report
None
ARF
#
PEA (34) #19 001-621
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report. Appendices, Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
Jury 1990
Technkal Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
MK01\RPTK)0628026.004\i3nxLapd
D-26
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #20 001-420
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices, Volume II
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.4) #21 001-658
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices, Volume in
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #22 001-688
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices, Volume IV
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
REORIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #23 001-261
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices, Volume V
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #24 001-340
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Summary Analytical Tables
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #25 001-007
Geophysical Survey Letter Report, Stage 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
19 October 1989
Letter Report
None
ARF (Section 3.4 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-27
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #26 001-006
Jet Engine Test Cell Letter Report
RoyF.Wetton, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
9 January 1990
Letter Repoit
Jet Engine Test Cell
ARF (Section 3.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #28 001-005
Geophysical Letter Report for the IRP Stage 3B, Areas of Concern 34 and 32/36
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
17 August 1990
Letter Report
Site 32/36, Site 34
ARF (Section 3.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #29 001-011
Recovery Wen Letter Report for Site 32/36
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
14 September 1990
Letter Repoit
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.4 Binder)
#
PEA (3.4) #30 001-017
Recovery Well Selection Letter Report: IRP Site 34
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
1 October 1990
Letter Report
Site 34
ARF (Section 3.4 Binder)
#
PEA (3.4) #35 001-279
Installation Restoration Program, Sage 3C, Site Characterization Summary IRP Sites 32/36
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
Jury 1991
Technical Report
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #36 001-
InstaBation Restoratio
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1991
Technical Report
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
i Program, Stage 3C, Site Characterization Summary IRP Site 34
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-28
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #37 001-
InstallatioD Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Site Characterization Summary IRP Site 34 - Appendix
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1991
Technical Report
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #38 001-041
Pease AFB Monitor Well Inventory and Inspection
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 August 1992
Report
None
' ARF (Section 3.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #39 001-D
Background Values for Soil, Groundwater, Surface Water and Sediment at Pease Air Force Base
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
26 February 1993
Letter
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #42 001-Figure 11
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base, Regional Groundwater Model
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #44 001-C2
Pease Air Force Base Monitor Well Inventory and Inspection Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
04 October 1994
Report
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #45 001-005
Mclntyre Brook Sediment Excavation Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
January 1995
Report
None
ARF
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-29
09/18/95
-------
3.5 Remedial InrtstigatiM (KI) Rtcorts
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #7 001-5.2.1
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Site Characterization Summary Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH Technical Report
RoyF. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Report
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #6 001-C
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4. Site Characterization Summary Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH Appendices
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Appendices
ZooeS
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #11001-A3
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C Jet Engine Test Cell - IRP Site 34, Source Area Remedial Investigation
Pease AFB, NH Technical Report - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Report
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #12 001-H.40
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Jet Engine Test Cell •
Pease AFB, Appendices A-H, - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Appendices
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
IRP Site 34, Source Area Remedial Investigation
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #13 001-1608
Installation Restoration Pr
ignm, Stage 3C Jet Engine Test Cell - IRP Site 34, Source Area Remedial Investigation
Pease AFB, Appendices I-J, -DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 199?
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (3.5) #14 001-M.16
Installation Restoration P.
Pease AFB, Appendices K-M, - DRAFT FINAL
RoyF. Weston, Inc.
n. Stage 3C, Jet Engine Test Cell - IRP Site 34, Source Area Remedial Investigation,
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3«xLapd
D-30
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
USAF
May 1992
Appendices
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #15 001-6.4.1
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Jet Engine Test Cell - IRP Site 34, Source Area Remedial Investigation,
Pease AFB, NH - Figures -DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Figures
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
#
PEA (3.5) #16 001-B.12
Sampling Locations and Results Drainage Area Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Report
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #17 001-6.4.1
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C IRP Site 32/36 Source Area Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB. NH.
Figures - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
June 1992
Figures
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
PEA (33) #18 001-N
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, IRP Site 32/36, Source Area Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH.
Appendices D, E F, G, L, M and N - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
June 1992
Appendices
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #19 001-C
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 3C. IRP Site 32/36 Source Area Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH.
Appendices A-C - Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
June 1992
Appendices
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-31
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #20 001-ACR.3
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 3C IRP Site 32/36, Source Area Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB. NH,
Technical Report - DRAFT FINAL
RoyF. Weston, Inc.
USAF
June 1992
Report
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
*
PEA (3.5) #43 001-126
Haven Well Pumping Test Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc. •
Jim Snyder, AFCEE/ESB, USAF
8 January 1993
Transmittal Letter, Letter Report, Maps, Appendices
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #87 001-ACR4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Text-DRAFT
FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Report
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #88 001-6390
VS. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Section 6 Tables-
-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Tables
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #89 001-F.94
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3'Remedial Investigation Report Figures-DRAFT
FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Figures
Zone3 ""
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
PEA (3.5) #90 001-D.26
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program. Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendices A,
C and D-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-32
09/18/95
-------
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Appendices
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #91 001-B
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix B Part
Iof2 DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Western, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #92 001-B
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix B Part
2 of 2 DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF
#
PEA (3.5) #93 001-1000
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendices B,
E F, G, L and M-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendices
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #94 001-H.4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB. Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix H Pan
1 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (same as DRAFT FLNAL September 1993)
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #95 001-H
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program. Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix H Pan
2 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (same as DRAFT FINAL September 1993)
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-33
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #96 001-H
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Progtam, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix H Pan
3 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (same as DRAFT FINAL September 1993)
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #97 001-2388
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix I Pan
lof2-DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #98 2424-5307
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investiphon Report Appendix I Part
2of2-DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #99 001-J.l
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendices 1
and J Part 1 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendix
Zone3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (IS) #100 001-J.2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix J Pan
2 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Scptcnbcr 1993
AppcodiJT*
Zooe3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\i3nxtapd
D-34
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #101 001-K.7
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix K-
DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Western, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #112 001-K3-2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study Report-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Zone 3
ARF, PEA (4.2) #24 001-K3-2 on Zone 3 Shelf (Filed as Feasibility Study Report)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #113 001-206
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Addendum 1,
Site 65, Site Investigation
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Addendum Report
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #115 001-039
Cumulative Risk Evaluation for Zone 1 through Zone 5 at Pease AFB, N.H.
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1994
Risk Evaluation Report
Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3, Zone 4, Zone 5
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE: _
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (33) #117 001-Appendix C
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base Zone 3 Remedial Investigation
Report Addendum 2, Site 73, Site Investigation - Text and Appendices A. B & C
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1994
Report
Zone 3, Site 73
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (33) #118 Appendix D
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base Zone 3 Remedial Investigation
Report Addendum 2, Site 73, Site Investigation - Appendix D
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-35
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
Miyl994
Appendix
Zone 3, Site 73
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYP.E
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #120 001406
Zone 3 Water Hardness
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
03 August 1994
Letter with enclosures
Zone 3
ARF (Section 3.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT.
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #121 001-007
Batewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 2 for Pease Air Force Base, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
05 August 1994
Letter with attachment
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 4
ARF (Section 3.5 Binder)
#
PEA (3.5) #122 001-002
Sediment Toricity Test Report for Flagstone and Mclntyn Brooks, Pease Air Force Base. NH
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto. AFBCA
30 September 1994
Fax
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 35 Binder)
#
PEA.(3-5)#123001-E34
Summary of Revisions to Batewide Interim Monitoring Plan. Pease Air Force Base, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
23 November 1994
Interim Monitoring Plan
PEA (10.1) #161 001-006
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (3.5) #124 001-040
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 4 for Pease Air Force Base, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF _
16 December 1994
Interim Monitoring Report
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 4; Zone 5; Zone 7; PEA (10.1) #161 001-006
ARF
#
PEA (3.5) #125 001-010
Test Cell Remedial Action Letter Report
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nx».apd
D-36
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
03 January 1995
Letter Report
JETC
ARF (Section 3-5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #126 Appendix H - Appendix K
Installation Restoration Program Stage 3C IRP Site 32/36 Source Area Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH,
Appendices H, I and K - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
February 1995
Appendices
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
PEA (3.5) #128 i-Appendix E
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report for Pease Air Force Base, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1994
Report
None
ARF
#
PEA (3.5) #129 1.1-Figure 2.7.6
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force Base, Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 1
for October Through December 1993 - Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Report
None
ARF
#
PEA (3S) #130 Appendix A - Appendix C
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force Base, Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 1
for October Through December 1993 - Volume n
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Report
None
ARF
#
PEA (35) #131 001-043
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force Base, Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 2
for January Through March 1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
July 1994
Report
None
ARF
#
MKQl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-37
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.5) #132 001-049
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
U.S. Air Force Instillation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force Base, Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1994
Report
None
ARF
*
3.6 RICormp*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #1 001-001
Comments Regarding the Work Plan for the IRP Stage 2
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
27 July 1987
Comments Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) 4>2 001-006
Letter Regarding IRP, Stage 2
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
11 November 1987
Letter Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) 03 001-001
Letter Stating Conformance of the Stage 2, Quality Assurance Project Plan With Air Force IRP Practices
State of New-Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
12 November 1987
Letter Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
0
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) 05 001-003
Letter Concerning Short-Duration Pumping Tests of the Haven and Harrison Water Supply Wells
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
14 June 1988
Letter Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
Haven Wall
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
0
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONCTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
PEA (3.6) 06 001-001
Letter Concerning Drilling Program
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
20 October 1988
Letter Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3nxLapd
D-38
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #7 001-002
. Review of Work Plan Removal of Source Contamination at Building 244
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
8 March 1989
Letter Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
Bldg.244
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #8 001-001
Letter Regarding Technical Review of Building 244 Solvent Tank Removal and Off-Site Contaminant Migration
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
3 May 1989
Letter/Comments Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RJ Field Work Reports)
Bldg. 244
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #9 001-002
Letter Concerning Disposal of Drill Cuttings From Stage 2 IRP Investigations
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
2 October 1989
Letter Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #10 001-003
Review Comments on the Phase n, Stage 2 IRP, Draft Final Report
State of New Hampshire. Department of Environmental Services
USAF
28 February 1990
Review Comments on Phase n. Stage 2, IRP Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE __
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
PEA (3.6) #11 001-011
Review Comments for the Pease AFB, Phase n. Stage 2 IRP Draft Final Report
EPA
USAF
7 March 1990
Review Comments Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #12 001-010
Review Comments Regarding the IRP, Stage 2 Draft Final Report (December 1989)
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
EPA; USAF
7 March 1990
Review Comments Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-39
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION.
PEA (3.6) #13 001-020
Review Comments to the IRP Stage 2 RI/FS Draft Report
USAF
Roy F. Weston, Inc.; Pease AFB
15 March 1990
Review Comments Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RJ Field Work Reports)
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTrtE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #17 001-013
Split Sampling Results, Site 8 and Site 34
NHDES
USAF
29 October 1990
Site 8; Site 34
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #18 001-065
Sampling Results from Pease AFB, Newington. Portsmouth
NHDES
USAF
17 January 1991
Sampling Data
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #19 001-002
Installation Restoration Program (IRP) at Pease AFB, NH
Department of the Air Force
Pease AFB
8 March 1989
Memorandum - Pertaining to RJ
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
PEA (3.6) #20 001-002
Work Plan for the IRP Stage 3 and TTR #4
Department of the Air Force
Pease AFB
3 April 1989
Memorandum — Pertaining to RI
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #21 001-007
Consolidated Comments to the IRP Stage 3 Work Plan for Pease Air Force Base, NH
USAF
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1 June 1989
Review Comments - Pertaining to RI
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3nxLapd
D-40
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #22 001-001
Review Comments Regarding the Work Plan and QAPP - Stage 3
NHDES
USAF
16 June 1989
Review Comments - Pertaining to RI
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA' (3.6) #23 001-008
. Stage 3 Work Plan - Response to Comments
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
29 June 1989
Response to Comments - Pertaining to RI
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #24 001-008
Consolidated Comments to the IRP Stage 3 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Pease Air Force Base. NH
USAF
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
29 June 1989
Review Comments - Pertaining to RI
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #27 001-002
Letter Summarizing Discussions Between Roy F. Weston, Inc. and the New Hampshire Department of Environmental
Services Concerning On-Sitc Handling and Disposal of Soil and Water Generated During Drilling, Development,
Purging, and Pump Testing of Wells
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
12 March 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE: _
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #29 001-007
Review Comments on the Stage 3 Work Plan for the IRP
EPA
USAF
7 June 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) #30 001-002
Letter Concerning Proposed Drilling Locations, Stage 3B
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-41
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
12 June 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONGTTOE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #31 001-002
Letter Regarding Well Installation Modification
Roy F. Western, Inc.
USAF
5 July 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #32 001-004
Letter Regarding Procedures Used in Installing and Abandoning Monitor Well 632
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
8 August 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) #34 001-004
Letter Regarding the Disposal of dean Water, Drilling Mud and Soil
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
25 September 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #35 001-002
Letter »«p«iiiig procedures for Handling Solids and Liquids During Well Construction and Soil Borings
NHDES
USAF
25 September 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (34) #37 001-002
Letter Regarding Testing of IRP Site 32/36 Well
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
27 September 1990
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #38 001-002
Information Letter 3 - Documenting discussion on 25 October 1990
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-42
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
29 October 1990
Lener
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.6) #39 001-002
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
Letter Regarding the Disposal of dean Soil Cuttings and Drilling Mud
USAF
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1 November 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #41 001-008
Response to Comments - Draft Final Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling And Analysis Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 February 1991
Letter/Response to Comments
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #43 001-004
Issues Needing Resolution Prior to the Upcoming Field Efforts
EPA
USAF
10 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
. #
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #46 001-038
Response to Comments - Stage 4 Work Plan and SAP
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
28 September 1990
Response to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE "~
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #47 001-011
Review comments on the Installation Restoration Plan (IRP) Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
NHDES
USAF
16 October 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) #48 001-017
The Town of Newington Review Comments on the IRP Stage 4 Work Plan
The Town of Newington
USAF
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-43
09/18/9$
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
29 October 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMEiVT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #49 001-076
EPA Technical Review of the Draft IRP Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan for Pease Air Force Base
EPA
USAF
2 November 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #50 001-002
Response to Air Force Questions on State Comments to the Stage 4 Work Plan
NHDES
USAF
3 December 1990
Response to questions on comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #51 001-007
Response to EPA Comments on the Pease AFB Stage 4 Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan
Air Force
EPA
10 December 1990
Responses to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #52 001-4)08
Air Force Response to NHDES Comments - Draft Final Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 February 1991
Response to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #53 001-008
EPA Initial Approval of the IRP Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
EPA
USAF
13 Marcin991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) #54 001-058
Air Force Response to EPA Comments on the Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
USAF
EPA
MKDl\RFT:0062S026.004\z3nxLapd
D-44
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
1991
Response to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #56 001-001
EPA Concerns
USAF
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
8 April 1991
Internal Record of Phone Conversation with EPA and NHDES
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #57 001-004
Issues Needing Resolution Prior to Upcoming Field Efforts
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
10 April 1991
Letter
PEA (3.3)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
• #
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #58 001-002
Review of Risk Assessment Data and Sampling Procedures
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
16 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #59 001-067
Concerns about Analytical Methods
USAF
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
23 April 1991
Fax with Attachments
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR: _
RECIPIENT: "~
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
PEA (3.6) #60 001-001
Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Locations
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
24 April 1991
Letter (Transmittal)
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #61 001-008
Field Oversight Coordination
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D45
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
29 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
REdPEOT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #62 001404
Preliminary Sampling Schedule tor Stage 3C IRP Sites through November 1991
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
02 May 1991
Fax
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
PEA (3.6) #63 001403
Review of April 25, 1991 Revised Analytical Methods
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
08 May 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #64 001-002
Review of April 25. 1991 Revised Analytical Methods
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
08 May 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #65 001405
Field Performance Review of Western Activities, Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
Mitre Corporation
Dennis Lundquist, Human Systems Division
IRP Program Office
HSD/YAQ
Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5000
14 May 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
_ . #
PEA (3.6) #66 001402
Revised Analytical Methods for Pease AFB
Logan VanLeifh, Cape, USAF, BSC
Johanna Hunter, EPA
31 May 1991
Letter
PEA (3.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-46
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #67 001-005
Procedure for Establishing Background Metal Concentrations for Groundwater and Soil
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Western, Inc.
USAF
03 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #68 001-012
Information to Assist Interpretation of Data Submitted by EPA to the Air Force
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
06 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #69 001-004
Resolution Letter for Procedures for 8260 for VOC Analysis of Water
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
Cart Gysler, Earth Technology, San Bernardino, CA
Johanna Hunter, EPA
06 June 1991
Fax
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #70 001-001
Background Determination Protocols
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
07 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #71 001-001
Background Determination Protocols
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
07 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #72 001-003
Revised Analytical Methods for Pease AFB GC/MS Method 8260 for VOA
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston. Inc.
USAF
11 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-47
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #73 001-001
Laboratory Services
Richard Pease, NHDES
Ait Ditto, Peace AFB
13 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION
PEA (3.6) #75 001-002
EPA Pump Test Information Request to be Provided by Air Force
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, USAF
27 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #76 001-002
Roy F. Weston, Inc., Proposed Methods for Determining Background Concentrations at Pease Air Force Base, New
Hampshire
George Rice, Mitre Corporation
Dennis Lundquiit, Human Systems Division
IRP Program Office
HSD/YAQ
Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5000
02 July 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #77 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Protocols for Baseline Risk Assessments
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
18 July 1991
Transmittal Letter
Baseline Risk Assessments
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #78 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Protocols for Baseline Risk Assessments
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
18 July 1991
Transmittal Letter
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
PEA (3.6) #79 001-001
Submittal of Secondary Document
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
18 July 1991
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxLapd
D-48
09/18/95
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #80 001-002
Exploratory Boring Soil Sampling Procedures
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Capt Logan Van Leigh, AFCEE
26 July 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #81 001-001
Vented Monitoring Wells
Scott Doane, NHDES
Mark McKenrie, USAF
31 July 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #82 001-006
Review of the Proposed Procedure for Background Determination Protocols for Pease Air Force Base, Portsmouth.
NH
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
02 August 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #83 001-001
Vented Monitoring Wells - Response to July 31,1991 Letter on same Issue From NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Scon Doane, NHDES
26 August 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT: -
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #84 001-001
Split Sampling Results
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
9 September 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
PEA (3.6) #85 001-002
Field Oversight - September 1991
Richard Pease, NHDES
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-49
. 09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Arthur Ditto, USAF
28 October 1991
Letter
PEA (3.4)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #86 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Data Collected on Surface Water and Sediment Background Concentration
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Ed Barnes, Roy F. Weston
2 December 1991
Transmittal Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
PEA (3.6) #87 001-002
Regional Literature Search to Assist Development of the Sediment and Surface Water Background Determination
for Pease AFB, Portsmouth, NH
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
2 December 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #88 001-001
Fugitive Dust Pathway in the Baseline Risk Assessment
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
3 January 1992
Letter
PEA (3.5)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #89 001-001
Evaluation of the Air Pathway in Baseline Risk Assessment
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
11 February 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #90 001-0)1
Evaluation of the Air Pathway in Baseline Risk Assessment
USAF ~
Richard Pease, NHDES
11 February 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
PEA (3.6) #91 001-002
IRP Site 32/36 Source Area Remedial Investigation Report
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3«xLapd
D-50
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE.
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
14 February 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #92 001-001
IRP Site 32/36 Source Area Remedial Investigation Report
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Richard Pease, NHDES
14 February 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #93 001-001
IRP Site 32/36 Source Area Remedial Investigation Report
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Johanna Hunter, EPA
14 February 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #94 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document. Site 32/36 RI Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
25 February 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #95 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Baseline Risk Assessment Protocols
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
25 February 1992
Transmittal Letter
Baseline Risk Assessment
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #96 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Revised Baseline Risk Assessment Protocols
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
25 February 1992
Transmittal Letter
Revised Baseline Risk Assessment
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-51
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #97 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Site 32/36 RI Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
25 February 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
# '
PEA (3.6) #98 001-003
Request for EPA Split Sampling Results
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA •
9 March 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #99 001-D1
Letter Report of Results of Statistical Comparison of Stage 3C Samples to the 66 Other Background Samples
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
9 March 1992
Letter Report
PEA (3 3)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #100 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum Number 2 on the Draft Stage 4 Sampling and
Analysis Plan Addendum Number 2
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
24 March 1992
Transmittal Letter
PEA (3.1); PEA (33)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #101 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Stage 4 Addendum Number 2 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
Arthur Ditto. USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 March 1992
Transmittal Letter
PEA (3.1); PEA (33)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #102 001-001
Data You May Be Able to Provide
Thomas R. Marks, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenne, Pease AFB
26 May 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-52
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #103 001-022
Evaluation of Air Pathway in Baseline Risk Assessments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
13 April 1992
Letter with Attachments
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #104 001-004
Pease Air Force Base Site 34 Source Area Draft Final RI Report
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
07 May 1992
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #106 001-002
Oversight Role of Regulatory Agencies at Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
26 May 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #107 001-003
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document. Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 May 1992
Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #108 001-002
Pease Air Force Base Site IRP 32/36 Source Area Draft Final RI Report and Response to Comments for the IRP
Site 32/36 Draft RI Report
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston. Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
OS June 1992
Letter
Site 32/36; PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) #109 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document. Site 32/36 Remedial Investigation Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-53
09/18/95
-------
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
16 June 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.6) #110 001-001
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Submittal of Dnft Final Primary Document, Site 32/36 Remedial Investigation Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
16 June 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #111 001-001
Submittal of Dnft Secondary Documents, Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum 3 and Stage 4 Health and Safety Plan
Addendum
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 June 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #112 001-001
Submittal of Dnft Secondary Documents, Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum 3 and Stage 4 Health and Safety Plan
Addendum
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
24 June 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #113 001-002
Additional Field Oversight
USAF
Michael Daly, EPA
8 July 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #114 001-001
SubmitttUxtter for Dnft Site Chancterization Summary for IRP Site 32/36
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
18 Jury 1992
Tnnsmittal Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-54
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER; PEA (3.6) #116 001-021
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Pease Air Force Base Groundwater Modeling Letter Report
Lee dePeisia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
29 July 1992
Letter with Report
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.6) #119 001-001
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Transmittal Letter for Summary of Groundwater Treatment Plant Influent/Effluent Results
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
11 August 1992
Letter
PEA (2.7)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #120 001-001
Monitor Well Inventory and Inspection Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
18 August 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #121 001-002
Base Support Requirements for Haven Well Pumping Test
USAF
James Winder
Pat Hamel
EL. Hamm
21 August 1992
Letter
Haven well
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #122 001-002
Results of Background Surface Water Sediment Location Walkover
Richard Pease. NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
27 August 1992
Letter
PEA (6.4)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-55
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #123 001-005
Risk Assessment Issues for Pease AFB
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston. Inc.
Arthur Ditto, USAF
28 August 1992
Letter Report
PEA (3.5)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (16) #124 001-001
Tnnsmitttl Letter for Submittal of Groundwater Background Letter Report
Mark McKenzie for Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
Johanna Hunter, EPA
1 September 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #125 001-002
Policy on Data Transfer During Pumping Tests
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
Johanna Hunter, EPA
9 September 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #128 001-003
Summary of Risk Issues Meeting of August 19,1992
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
16 September 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #130 001-002
Field Oversight - Mid-August-Mid-September
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
7 October 1991
Letter
PEA (3.4)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #139 001-001
Submittal of Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
26 October 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-56
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #140 001-001
Submittal of Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 October 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #146 001-001
Application of the Reasonable Maximum Exposure (RME) in Risk Assessments
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
1 December 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #148 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Portion of the Stage 4 Sampling and
Analysis Plan (SAP) Number 3
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
11 December 1992
Letter
PEA (3.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #149 001-002
Request for Deadline Extension
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
23 December 1992
Letter
PEA (6.3)
ART1 (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE _
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
PEA (3.6) #150 001-001
Transmittal of EPA Maximum Risk Calculation Addenda to Site S, 8,32/36 and 34 Draft Final RI Reports
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
29 December 1992
Letter
Sites 5, 8, 32/36 and 34; PEA (3.5)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #152 001-002
MULTTMED as a Replacement for the Summers Model
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
An Ditto, AFBDA
11 March 1993
Letter
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-57
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #155 001-006
IRP Site 34 Contaminant Levels
NHDES
An Ditto, AFBDA
3 Much 1993
Letter
PEA (3.5); Site 34
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #156 001-002
Request for Deadline Extension
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 March 1993
Letter
PEA (3.5)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #161 001-001
Submittal of Draft Documents
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 April 1993
Letter
Zone 3. Zone 4, Landfill 5
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #162 001-001
Submittal of Draft Documents
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 April 1993
Letter
Zone 3, Zone 4, Landfill 5
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #168 001-002
Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report, Draft Final, Outstanding Risk Assessment Concern
NHDES
USAF
5 November 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
PEA (3.6) #169 001-002
Review of the Draft Final Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report. Pease AFB
EPA
USAF
8 November 1993
MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-58
09/18/95
-------
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Letter
Tone 3
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.6) #170 001-008
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Locations of Surface Wateis of the State of New Hampshire in the Vicinity of Former Pease AFB
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
16 November 1993
Letter with Attachment
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #172 001-001
Draft Final Zone 3,4, and 5 Remedial Investigation Reports, Pease AFB, NH
EPA
USAF
30 November 1993
Memorandum
Zone 3; Zone 4; Zone 5
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #173 001-013
Work Plan for Site 32/36, RECLAIM Pilot Test
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
6 December 1993
Letter with Attachments
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #174 001-001
Wort Plan for Site 32/36, RECLAIM Pilot Test
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
8 December 1993
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR: -
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
PEA (3.6) #178 001-003
Potential Issues of Dispute, Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Report.
Draft Final, November 1993 (Draft Final RI/FS)
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
20 December 1993
Letter
Section 42; Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
PEA (3.6) #179 001-002
Portsmouth - Pease Air Force Base (PAFB). Underground Storage Tank Program, Phase I: Removal and Closure
Report Prepared By Weston, Site 34: Jet Engine Test Cell (JETS), Dated December 15,1993 (DES #330745)
MKOl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-59
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Slavs Karnaukh, NHDES
Jay Flagg, AFBCA
28 Febniaiy 1994
Letter
Jet Engine Test Cell
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #180 001-001
Zone 3 Remedial Investigation (RI) Report, Addendum 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 April 1994
Letter
Zooe3
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #181001-001
Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report, Addendum 2
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 May 1994
Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #182 001-002
Interim Monitoring Plan, DES Review Comments
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
25 April 1994
Letter, with Response to Comments
Section 10.1
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG 'TILE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #183 001-063
Pease AFB Second Quarter Report for 1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
12 July 1994
Letter Repent
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6T #184 001-007
Sediment Tojqtity Letter Report for Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
15 Jury 1994
Letter Report
Zonel
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxUpd
D-60
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #187 001-001
Site 32 Tieatability Study Proposal
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
JOB Snyder, AFCEE/ERB
07 September 1994
Memorandum
Site 32
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #189 001-D 2
1994 Third Quarter Report
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
08 November 1994
Report
None
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #191 0014)02
Additional Air Force Response to NHDES Zone 3 Remedial Investigation
Addenda #1 and #2 Comments
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 February 1995
Letter
Zone 3; PEA (10.1)
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #196 001-AttS
Zone 3 Water Hardness at Pease AFB. NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
25 May 1994
Letter
Zone3
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (3.6) #196 001-011
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION: ~
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 6
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Michael Daly, EPA Region 1
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 July 1995
Letter
Zone 1. 2, 3,4,5 and Zone 7
ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-61
09/18/95
-------
4.1 ARAR Determinations
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.1) #1 001-024
New Hampshire ARAR List Update
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
13 April 1992
Letter and Tables
None (Section 4.1 Binder)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.1) #2 001-63
Installation Restoration Program Stage 4, Basewide ARARs, Pease Air Force Base, NH 03803 - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
January 1993
ARARs
None
ARF
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.1) #3 001-002
Waivenbility of Env-WS 430, Surface Water Quality Regulations, as an ARAR
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 December 1993
Letter
None
ARF (Section 4.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (4.1) #4 001-025
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
New Hampshire ARAR List Update
NHDES
USAF
23 December 1993
Letter with Attachment
None
ARF (Section 4.1 Binder)
4J Fusibility Reports
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (4.2) #2 001-D JO
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Initial Screening of Alternatives for IRP Site 34, Pease AFB, NH Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF -
January 1992
Report
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (4.2) #3 001-C38
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Initial Screening of Alternatives far IRP Site 32/36, Pease AFB. NH Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3«xUpd
D-62
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
USAF
January 1992
Report
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #13 001-53.9
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site 34, Pease AFB, NH, - Figures - Draft
Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1992
Report
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #14 001-J
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site 34, Pease AFB, NH, - Appendices - Draft
Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1992
Report
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4 3) #15 001-ACR.3
Installation Restoration Program. Stage 3C Feasibility Study for IRP Site 34, Pease AFB, NH, - Technical Report -
- Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1992
Technical Report
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (42) #16 001-4.2.12
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site 32/36, Pease AFB, NH, - Figures - Revised
Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Figures
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT.
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #17 001-ACR.3
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Report Text Pease AFB, NH, - Revised
Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Report
• Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-63
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #18 001-J.155
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program. Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Report, Pease AFB, NH, Appendices •
- Revised Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Appendices
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #24 001-1C5-2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study- Draft FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
PEA (3.5) 112 001-K5-2
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #25 001-MM4B-7
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Initial Screening of Alternatives-DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1993
Feasibility Study
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
PEA (42) #32 ES-l-ACR-3
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Feasibility Study Report Text-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Zone3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
PEA (4.2) #33 A-1-L4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3 Feasibility Study Report Appendices-DRAFT
FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendix""
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
PEA (4.2) #34 l-l-TH-5
Haven Pumping Test Letter Report for Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
8 January 1993
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-64
09/18/95
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Transmittal Letter, Letter Report
Zone 3
ART (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
PEA (4.2) #35 1.1-250
Installation Restoration Program. Hangar 227 Treatability Test-Final Report, Pease Air Force Base, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
July 1993
Report
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #42 001-A
Performance of the Site 32/36 Pilot Groundwater Treatment Plant Modified Interim Remedial Measure Between July
26 and September 16, 1993
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
11 November 1993
Letter Report
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT: -
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (4.2) #43 001-047
32/36 DNAPL Detection Well, Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
20 December 1993
Treatability Study Letter Report
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
PEA (4.2) #46 K-Q
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program. Pease Air Force Base, Zone 7 Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study, Site 45, Old Jet Engine Test Stand Appendices K, L, M, N, O, P and Q - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
December 1993
Appendices
Zone 7
ARF (Zone 7 Shelf)
#
PEA (4.2) #49 ES.1-B.5
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program. Pease AFB, Site 32 Technical Impractibility Evaluation
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1994
Evaluation Report
Site 32
ARF (Site 32/36. Shelf)
#
PEA (4.2) #52 001-Results
Site 32/36 Groundwater Extraction Assessment Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-65
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
USAF
01 July 1994
Repoit
Site 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #53 001-007
Groundwater Treatment Plant Influent/Effluent Results, Quarterly Reporting
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
EPA Region 1 NPDES Programs Operation Section
Jeff Andrews, NHDES Permit & Compliance Section
21 July 1994
Influent/Effluent Results
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 4.2 Binder)
*
PEA (4.2) #56 001-Figure 9
Site 32/36 Source Area Modeling
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
29 September 1994
Modeling Simulation Results
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 4.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION.
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.21 #57 001-003
Seismic Re motion Survey Results, Site 32/36. Pease AFB. NH
RoyF.Weston.Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
06 October 1994
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 42 Binder)
#
PEA (42) #63 001-R2
VS. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force Base, Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Addendum 1
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
December 1994
Feasibility Study
Site 32/36
ARF (She 32/36 Shelf)
#
PEA (4.2) #66 001-Attaehment B
Results oTthe Site 73 Groundwater Withdrawal System Performance Test
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
25 October 1994
Report
None
ARF
#
MK01\RFT00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-66
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #66 001-009
Pease Air Force Base Natural Attenuation Modeling for Zones 2 and 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
February 1995
Report
Zone 2; Zone 3
ARF (Zone 2 shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4 2) #69 001-Fig. 14
Pease Air Force Base Natural Attenuation Modeling for Zones 2 and 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1995
Report
Zone 2; Zone 3
ARF (Section 4.2 Binder)
#
4J Proposed Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #3 001-Figure 5
Installation Restoration Program, Proposed Plans for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34. Pease Air Force Base, NH 03803-0157 -
- Draft Final
USAF
EPA; NHDES; Public
March 1993
Proposed Plan
Site 34
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTrLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #4 001-Hgure 5
Installation Restoration Program, Proposed Plans for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34. Pease Air Force Base, NH 03803-0157 •
- Draft Final
USAF
EPA; NHDES; Public
March 1993
Proposed Plan
Site 34; Site 32/36
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTnLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE -
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #5 001-G4
Installation Restoration Program, Proposed Plan for IRP Sites 32/36, Pease AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
January 1994
Proposed Plan
Sites 32/36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (43) #6 001-Rl
Installation Restoration Program, Proposed Plan for Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-67
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
January 1994
Proposed Plan
Zone 3
ARF (Zone 3 Shelf)
4A SopplwMMs aad Revisions to tht Proposed Plan
'NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
43 Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #5 001-002
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs)
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Peaie AFB
25 November 1991
Letter
PEA (6.4)
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
*
PEA (4.5) *6 001-001
Submitul of Secondary Document
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
09 January 1992
Letter
Site 32/36: Site 34
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #7 001-001
Submitul of Secondary Document
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
09 January 1992
Letter
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTOE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (4.5) #9 001-004
Jet Engine Test Cell Source Area Feasibility Study Report
Edward S. Banes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Tease, NHDES
04 May 1992
Letter
Jet Engine Test Cell
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
PEA (4.5) #10 001-005
Pease AFB Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Report
Edwmrd S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\i3nxUpd
D-68
09/18/95
-------
REOPEN!:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richaid Pease, NHDES
15 May 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #11 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
19 May 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
PEA (4 5) #12 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 May 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION.
PEA (43) #14 001-001
. Document Submittals
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 May 1992
Letter
Pea (10.1); Site 34
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #15 001-002
Selection of Remedial Action Alternative for JETC IRP Site 34
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
28 May 1992
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBJER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #18 001-002
Feasibility Study Reports
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
10 August 1992
Letter
Sites 5, 34, and 32/36
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-69
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (45) #28 001-002
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
REOPEN!:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Pease Air Force Base Draft Final IRP Site 34 FS Report
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Western, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease. NHDES
20 November 1992
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 45 Binder)
f
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #29 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Document, Site 34 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter. EPA
24 November 1992
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #30 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Document, Site 34 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 November 1992
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 45 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (45) #31 001-001
Determination of Site Boundaries at the Time of Remedial Action Implementation (Will Migrate to Proposal)
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
2 December 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 45 Binder)
#
PEA (45) #32 001-002
Request for Deadline Extension
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Peace, NHDES
4 December 1992
Letter
Site 34 ~
ARF (Section 45 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
PEA (45) #33 001-001
Site 34 GWTP ITIR
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
9 December 1992
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-70
09/18/9$
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4 S) #34 001-002
Pease Air Force Base Draft Final IRP Site 32/36 FS Report
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Jim Snyder, USAF
10 December 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #35 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Document, Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
14 December 1992
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #36 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Document, Site 32/36 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
14 December 1992
Letter ,
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE .
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4 S) #37 001-001
Submittal of Buildings 113/119 and Building 222 Draft Proposed Plan
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
16 December 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE _
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #38 001-001
Submittal of Buildings 113/119 and Building 222 Draft Proposed Plan
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
16 December 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 45 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (4.5) #42 001-001
Submittal of the Sites 32/36 and 34 Draft Final Proposed Plan
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-71
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
9 Much 1993
Letter
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #44 001-002
Submittal of the Sites 32/36 and 34 Drift Final Proposed Plan
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
03 February 1993
Letter
PEA (6.3); Sites 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #47 001-002
Site 32/36 and Sit 34 Draft Final Proposed Plans
NHDES
An Ditto, AFBDA
12 February 1993
Letter
Sites 32/36; Site 34; Pea (43)
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT.
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #50 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 3 Initial Screening of Alternatives
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
17 May 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #51 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 3 Initial Screening of Alternative*
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 May 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION: '
PEA (4.5) #58 001-003
Former Pease AFB, Surface Water Issues
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
29 November 1993
Letter
None
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (4.5) #61 001-001
Groundwtter Treatment Plant Influent/Effluent Results, Quarterly Reporting
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-72
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Bill Wandle, EPA
Jeff Andrews, NHDES
9 December 1993
Letter
Site 32/36; Site 34; Site 39
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
ARTHUR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT.
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (43) #62 001-007
Groundwater Treatment Plant Influent/Effluent Results, Quarterly Reporting
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Bill Wandle, EPA Region I
Jeff Andrews, NHDES
24 January 1994
Letter Report
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
PEA (4.5) #65 001-001
Regional Groundwater Model
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
John Regan, NHDES
3 June 1994
Letter
Haven Well
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:'
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
PEA (43) #67 001-008
Performance Testing of Site 73 Groundwater Withdrawal System .
Roy. F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
22 June 1994
Letter Report
Site 73
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
#
PEA (43) #68 001-001
Site 32/36 Groundwater Extraction Letter Report
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
07 July 1994
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
#
PEA (43) #69 001-001
7/6/94 Air Force Proposal for the Disposal of Soil Excavated From IRP Site 35
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
18 July 1994
Letter
Landfill 5; Site 35
ARF (Section 43 Binder)
#
PEA (43) #72 001-002
Continued Discussion on the Technical Impracticability (TI) Waiver for Site 32
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
27 September 1994
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-73
09/18/95
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Letter
Site 32
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #75 001-008
Site 32 Technical Impracticability Issues
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
30 November 1994
Letter
Site 3% Zone 3
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #93 001-007
Supplement to the Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
10 February 1995
Letter with attachment
Zone 3; PEA (4.2)
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
PEA (4.5) #94 001410
Zone 3 Draft Proposed Plan
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
13 February 1995
Letter with attachments
Zone 3; PEA (5.1)
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION.
PEA (4.5) #97 001-002
Natural Attenuation Modeling for Zones 2 and 3 at Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
Lee de Persia, Roy F. Western, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
16 February 1995
Letter
Zone 2; Zone 3
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #125 001401
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 5
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 June 1995
Letter
None
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
PEA (4.5) #127 001-001
Site 32/36 and Zone 3 Final Proposed Plans
Roy F.tfeston, AFBCA
Jim Snyder, AFCEE/ESB
30 June 1995'
Letter
None
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3roiUpd
D-74
09/18/95
-------
5.1 ROD
DOCUMENT NUMBER; PEA (5.1) #1 001-12.1
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Record of Decision for a Source Area Remedial Action
at Site 34
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
ROD
Site 34
ARF (Site 34 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (5.1) #9 001-App. A
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
Record of Decision, Zone 3, Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire - FINAL
USAF
EPA
NHDES
June 1995
ROD
Zone 3
ARF
Amendments to ROD
• NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
S3 Explanations of Significant Differences
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (53) #1 001-002
Preparation of an Explanation of Significant Difference Document for the Site 34 RA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
04 January 1995
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 5 J Binder)
DOCUMEVT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR: -
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (S3) #2 001-005
Draft ESD for Site 34
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 January 1995
Letter with attachments
Site 34; PEA (5.1); PEA (10.6)
ARF (Section S3 Binder)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-75
09/18/95
-------
5.4 Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (5.4) #1 001-001
Region 1 ROD Model Language
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Unknown
Letter
None
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (5.4) #2 001-001
Submitul of Draft Primary Document, Site 34 Record of Decision
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Mike Daly. EPA
17 June 1993
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (5.4) *3 001401
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Site 34 Record of Decision
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 June 1993
Letter
Site 34
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
*
PEA (5.4) #4 001402
Pease AFB TRP ROD Review Process
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
AFBCA/NE
15 December 1993
Letter
None
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
*
PEA (5.4) #5 001-002
Getting to a ROD, Revised Milestones
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
4 February 1994
Letter —
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
PEA (5.4) #12 001-002
Getting to a ROD
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
15 August 1994
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3RXLapd
D-76
09/18/95
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Letter
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4; Site 32/36; Site 45
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
*
PEA (5.4) #24 001-006
Document Review Schedule
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
14 November 1994
Letter with attachment
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4; Site 32/36; Site 45
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (5.4) #25 001-002
Additional Requests for Additional Documents for EPA Review
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA
12 December 1994
Letter
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4; Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE-
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (5.4) #30 001-003
Project Status and Schedule, Pease Air Force Base, Newington, New Hampshire
Mary Sanderson, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
02 March 1995
Letter with attachments
None
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (5.4) #47 001-001
Draft Zone 3 Record of Decision (ROD)
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Hank Lowman, AFBCA/NE
22 June 1995
Memorandum
Draft Zone 3 ROD; PEA (5.1)
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (5.4) #47 001-001
Draft Zone 3 Records of Decisions (ROD)
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
14 July 1995
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
PEA (5.4) #64 001-001
Zone 3 Remedial Action Usage Limits on Haven Well
Arthur L. Ditto
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodJpd
D-77
09/18/95
-------
REOPIEOT: Mike Daly, EPA
Gaiy Lynn, NHDES
DATE- 14 August 1995
TYPE Letter
SECOND REFERENCE: Zone 3
LOCATION: ARF (Section 5.4 Binder)
MK01\RrT:«)628026.004\z3ro
-------
6.1 Cooperative Agreements / SMOAs
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.1) #2 001-004
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health
Laboratory (USAFOEHL) and Pease Air Force Base relating to procedures for conducting the IRP
U.S. Department of the Air Force
Pease AFB
31 July 1987
Memorandum of Understanding
None
ARF (Section 6.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.1) #3 001-020
Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement
USAF
NHDES
14 December 1992
DSMOA
None
ARF (Section 6.1 Binder)
62 Federal Facility Agreement (FFA)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (62) #1 001-097
Federal Facility Agreement under CERCLA Section 120
EPA; State of New Hampshire; USAF
EPA; NHDES; USAF
24 April 1991
Federal Facility Agreement
None
ARF (Section 62 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (62) #2 001-003
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
16 January 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
(Section 6.2 Binder)
#
PEA (62) 03 001-003
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
20 February 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.2 Binder)
#
. MK01\RPT:00628026.004\23rod.apd
D-79
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION: .
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) #4 001-003
Remedial Project MaMfers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
20 March 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 62 Binder)
*
PEA (6.2) #5 001-002
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
17 April 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 62 Binder)
*
PEA (6.2) +6 001-002
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
21 May 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) #7 001402
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
24 June 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 62 Binder)
#
PEA (6.2) #8 001-n.4
Modification 1 to Pease AFB Federal Facilities Agreement
USAF
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
8 September 1993
FFA Modification
None
ARF (Secflpn 62 Binder)
*
MK01\RFTK)0628026.004\t3rc
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (62) #9 001-Attachmem B
LONG TITLE: Submittal of the Quarterly Report for Fust Quarter 1995
AUTHOR: Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
RECIPIENT: Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
DATE: 23 May 1995
TYPE: Report
SECOND REFERENCE: None
LOCATION: ARF (Section 62 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd D-81 09/18/95
-------
6J Coordination - State / FtdenI
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) *1 001-003
Meeting Minutes From Air Force Meeting With State Officials Concerning Pease Air Force Base IRP
USAF
See Distribution List
11 March 1987
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #2 001-002
Agenda for Meeting with State DES, Air Force, and EPA Technical Team
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
26 April 1990
Agenda
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #3 001-031
Completed Application! for Department of the Army Permit (ENG Form 435) and New Hampshire Wetlands Board
Permit
Department of the Air Force
Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division
31 August 1989
Letter and Attachments
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
*
PEA (6.3) #4 001-002
Letter Regarding Emergency Discharge Exclusion From the Requirement for a Permit under the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
EPA
USAF
29 September 1989
Letter
NPDES
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) *6 001401
Agenda and Notes for Working Meeting with U.S. EPA and State of New Hampshire
USAF
See Distribution List
21 November 1989
Agenda and Meeting Notes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-82
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #7 001-025
Letter Response to Air Force Letter of 22 August 1990 Regarding CERCLA Remedial Actions at Pease Air Force
Base, 404 Permit Not Required
Department of the Army
USAF
3 October 1990
Response Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
PEA (63) #8 001-033
Point Paper on Installation Restoration Program (Pease AFB) and Attachments (Prepared for a meeting of J. Coit
and M. Aldrich, of Senator Humphrey's office, with Pease, NKDES, WESTON, and OEHL)
USAF
J. Coit & M. Aldrich of Senator Humphrey's Office
31 March 1989
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION: -
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) #9 001-003 .
Recommendation to Place Pease AFB on the National Priority List (NPL)
USAF
EPA
27 June 1989
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
PEA (63) #10 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes of January 16,1991
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
16 January 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
PEA (63) #11 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes of February 20,1991
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
20 February 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
PEA (6.3) #12 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
USAF
See Distribution List
20 March 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-83
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (6.3) #13 001404
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
17 April 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #14 001-003
•Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
21 May 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #15 001-004
Notification of Additional Investigative Work in a Wetland
USAF
NHDES
14 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #16 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
24 June 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
PEA (63) #17 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
24 Jury 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
- #
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TtTLE
AUTHOR '
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #18 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
21 August 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
MK01\RFT:0062802&004\z3nxLaDd
D-84
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #19 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
26 September 1991
Meeting Minutes
None'
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
PEA (63) #20 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
27 October 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION.-
PEA (63) #21 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
20 November 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #22 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes of January 27,1992
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
19 December 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
PEA (63) #23 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
27 January 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #24 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
25 February 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\r3rod.apd
D-85
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (63) #25 001-002
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
REORIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION.
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
07 April 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) 4>26 001404
NH Wetiuxb Permit for National Priorities List Related Work
USAF
NHDES
24 April 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) #27 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
USAF
See Distribution List
22 April 1992
Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
PEA (63) #28 001-008
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto. USAF
See Distribution List
3 June 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #29 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
21 August 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #30 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
10 September 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3nxiai>d
D-86
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #31 001-002
New Hampshire Sites Where SVE is Used for NAPL Removal
John Regan, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
Scott Doane, NHDES
30 September 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
' PEA (63) #32 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
20 October 1992
Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #33 001-003
Application of the Reasonable Maximum Exposure (RME) in Risk Assessments; Request for Site Specific Justification
for Using the "Average Maximum*
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter. EPA
Capt. Woerhle, AFCEE
22 October 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #34 001-001
Guidebook for Environmental Permits in New Hampshire
Richard Pease, NHDES
An Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
4 November 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
PEA (6.3) #36 001-Attachment 6
Quarterly Report, Second Quarter 1991
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
19 July 1991
Quarterly Report
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
PEA (6.3) #37 001-034
Quarterly Report, Third Quarter 1991
• MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-87
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
REOPIEVT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Roy F. Western, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
24 October 1991
Quarterly Report, Tnnsmitul Letters
None
ARF (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
*
PEA (63) #38 001-030
Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter 1991
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
14 January 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
*
PEA (63) #39 001-020
Quarterly Report, Fust Quarter 1992
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
IS April 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
*
PEA (63) #40 001-032
Quarterly Report, Second Quarter 1992
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
14 July 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
#
PEA (63) #41 001-043
Quarterly Report, Third Quarter 1992
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
20 October 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
#
PEA (63f#42 001-Q4
Transmittal Letter for Quarterly Progress Report, Fourth Quarter 1992
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 January 1993
Transmittal Letter and Quarterly Report
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
#
MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-88
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #43 001-E1
Quarterly Progress Report for Pease AFB
An Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA Region 1
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 April 1993
Report
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office tiles
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #45 001-007
Groundwater Treatment Plant Influent/Effluent Results, Quarterly Reporting
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
EPA
15 November 1994
Report
NPDES Permit No. NH0090000
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) #46 001402
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
See Distribution List
OS April 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #47 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
See Distribution List
31 May 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (63) #49A 001-Attachment 1
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 June 1995
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
PEA (63) #50 001-B.2
Submittal of the Quarterly Report for First Quarter 1995
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
23 May 1995
Report
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-89
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
*
PEA (63) #51001-002
RFM Meeting Minute* from June 6,1995 Meeting
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Peate, NHDES
26 July 1995
Meeting; Minutes
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
(4 General Corrwpradcoec
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #1 001-003
Wetlands Application No. 89-1805
NHDES
State of New Hampshire
14 September 1989
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #2 001-001
Request for Information for Wetlands Permit
NHDES
USAF
18 September 1989
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
*
PEA (6.4) #4 001-005
Air Force Letter to the Wetlands Board Regarding a Request for Approval for a Modification to the Wetlands
Permitted Scope of Work*
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Delbett Downing, Wetlands Board, Concord, NH
21 November 1989
Letter
None _
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #5 001-010
Letter to EPA Regarding Background Information on Pease Air Forte Base
US Department of Commeict
USAF
7 March 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
*
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-90
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #6 001-001
File # 92479; CERGLA Related Temporary Fill .of 2000 Square Feet for Wells at Pease AFB, NH
Kenneth N. Kettenring, NHDES
An Ditto, Pease AFB
26 May 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #9 001-041
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance July, August and September 1993
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Report
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #10 001-004
Appropriateness of CERCLA Versus State or Other Authorities for Closing Military Installations
Robert Vamey, Commissioner, NHDES
Carol Browner, Administrator, EPA
11 February 1994
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #12 001-B.3 .
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance October, November and December 1993
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
January 1994
Report
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #13 001-B.4
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance January, February and March 1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Report
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #14 001-022
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program January 13,1994 Informal Dispute Resolution Meeting - Final
Minutes
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Michael Daly, EPA
16 March 1994
Letter with Meeting Minutes Attached
Section 10.1
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodjpd
D-91
09/18/9S
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #18 001-064
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance: Calendar Months April, May, tod June 1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
July 1994
Report
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
*
PEA (6.4) #19 001-022
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance: Calendar Months October, November, and December 1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
February 1995
Report
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) 020 001-003
Pease Air Force Base, Standard Operating Procedure for Well Abandonment
John Regan, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
13 January 1995
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #22 001-004
Background Contamination
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
30 January 1995
Letter with attachments
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #23 001-001
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
30 January 1995
Letter
None
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #26 001-006
Groundwater Treatment Plant Influent/Effluent Results, Quarterly Reporting
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
02 March 1995
Letter with attachments
ZoneS
ARF (Section 6.4 Binder)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-92
09/18/95
-------
7.1 Enforcement History
'NOTE; NO EtfntlES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
12 Endangerment Assessments
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
7J Administrative Orders
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (73) #1 001-03
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Pease AFB Federal Facilities Agreement Modification
USAF
Pease AFB
EPA Region 1
NHDES
NH Attorney General
January 1993
FFA Modification
none
ARF (Section 73 Binder)
#
1A Consent Decrees
•NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
7.5 Affidavits
7.6 Documentation of Technical Discnssions / Response Actions
• NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
7.7 Notices, Letters, and Responses
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
MK01\RrT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-93
09/18/95
-------
11 ATSDRH*
• DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (8.1) #1 00141
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C Health Assessment, Pease AFB, NH, Volume I Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1991
Health Assessment
None
ARF
*
12
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (12) *1 001-ZN4
Installation Restoration Profram Stage 4 ToMtity Profiles, Pease Air Force Base, NH 03803
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
January 1993
Toxitity Profiles
None
ARF
*
13 GtMral Corrtspoodne*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION.
PEA (8.3) *1 001-001
Health Assessment Split Sample
NHDES
Ait Ditto, Pease AFB
26 July 1991
Letter
PEA (6.4)
ARF (Section 83 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (8.3) #2 001-001
Health Assessment Report for Pease AFB
USAF
Leslie Campbell, ATSDR
26 June 1992
Letter
None
ARF (Section 63 Binder)
*
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3ro(Upd
D-94
09/18/95
-------
9.1 Notices Issued
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
9.2 Findings of Fact
'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
93 Reports
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT TfflS TIME
9A General Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (9.4) #2 001-002
LONG TITLE: Trustees for Natural Resources
AUTHOR: Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
RECIPIENT: AFBCA/NE
DATE 20 May 1994
TYPE: Letter with Attachment
SECOND REFERENCE: None
LOCATION: ARF (Section 9.4 Binder)
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3KXi.apd D-95 09/18/95
-------
10.1 Cooumats and Responses
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #1 001-005
Response to Comments - Draft Final Community Relations Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 February 1991
Letter/Response to Comments
PEA (10.2)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #2 001-003
Drift Community Relations Plan Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
30 November 1990
Letter Comment Report
PEA (10.2)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #3 001-010
EPA Region 1 Comments to IRP Draft Community Relations Plan; Pease AFB
Douglas S. Gutto, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
7 December 1990
Letter Comment Report
PEA (10.2)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #4 001-011
EPA Comments on Pease AFB Community Relations Plan with Air Force's Responses
Unknown (From Air Force)
USAF
January 1991
Comment Report
PEA (102)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #5 001404
NHDES Comments on Pease AFB Community Relations Plan with Air Force Responses
Unknown (From Air Force)
USAF
January 1991
Comment Report
PEA (101)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
*
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\t3rc«Upd
D-96
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #6 001-002
Review of Draft (Revised) Final Report IRP Community Relations Plan
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
25 March 1991
Letter
PEA (10.2)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #7 001-003
Comments Remaining Unresolved for Stage 4 Work Plan Analysis Method
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
05 May 1991
Comments
PEA (3.1)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #9 001-002
Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Draft Fact Sheet Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
17 April 1992
Comments
PEA (10.6); PEA (6.3)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #12 001-003
Review Comments for Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum Number 2
Richard H. Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
08 May 1992
Letter
PEA (33)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #13 001-014
Review Comments for Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum Number 2
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
14 May 1992
Transmittal Sheet, Letter and Comment Report
PEA (3.1); PEA (33)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.1) #14 001-013
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Review of Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum Number 2 for Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Federal Facilities Superfund Section
Arthur Ditto, USAF
14 May 1992
Letter with Comment Report
PEA (3.1); PEA (33)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-97
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER; PEA (10.1) #16 001-006
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary, May 1992 Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
11 June 1992
Comments
PEA (6.3); Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.1) #17 001-009
LONOTTTLE-
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION: '
Review of the Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary for Pease Air Force Base, Portsmouth, NH - May 1992
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
11 June 1992
Comments
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #18 001-003
Site 32/36 Letter Report Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
15 June 1992
Comments
PEA (63); Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #19 001-015
Review of the Stage 3C Feasibility Study for IRP Site 34 Pease Air Force Base, Portsmouth. NH May 1992
Michael J. Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
18 June 1992
Comments
Site 34
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #20 001-012
Review of the Draft Stage 3C Feasibility Study for IRP Site 32/36, Pease AFB, Portsmouth, NH - May 1992
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
01 Jury 1992
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #21 001-003
AOC 32/36 Draft Final Remedial Investigation June 1992, Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
08 Jury 1992
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3RxUpd
D-98
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.1) #24 001-003
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Comments on Haven Pump Test Design and Piezometer Installations
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
7 August 1992
Comments
PEA (63); Haven Well
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #26 0014)02
Haven Well Pump Test at Pease Air Force Base, NH
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
11 August 1992
Comments
Haven Well
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #27 001-002
Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum 3 Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
14 August 1992
Comments
PEA (6.3)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #28 001-006
Haven Well Test Response to Comments
James G. Spratt, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
17 August 1992
Response to Comments
Haven Well
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #29 001-026
Response to Comments on Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Capt. Carl Woerhle, AFCEE
1 September 1992
Letter with Comment Report
Zone 3; PEA (3.4)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #31 001-003
Review of Letter Report Re: Addition of Bedrock Wells to Groundwater Extraction System at Site 32/36
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
22 September 1992
Letter
Site 32/36; PEA (2.7)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-99
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
TV :
SE ,ND REFERENCE
LC ATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #34 001-002
Review Comments on Stage 3C Letter Report for IRP Site 34 Gtouadwiter Remediation System
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
1 October 1992
Comments
Site 34; PEA (2.7)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #39 001-003
NHDES Response to Comments to Site 42 Final Site Inspection Report, ICF Kaiser Engineers Portsmouth Waste
to Energy Plant, dated July 1992
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
22 October 1992
Response to Comments
Site 42; PEA (1.4)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #40 001-006
Response to Comments, Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 2
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
3 November 1992
Response to Comments
PEA (33); PEA (3.1)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #43 001-003
Review Comments for Stage 3B, Informal Technical Information Report for IRP Site 32/36
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
13 November 1992
Comments
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #44 001-002
Review of Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3, Pease AFB
Michael Daly; EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
23 November 1992
None
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #54 001-002
Review Comments/Pease AFB Railroad Track (Site 46) Site Investigation Letter Report
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
4 January 1993
Comments
Site 46
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
MKDl\RPT:0062«B6.0M\z3nxUpd
D-100
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #56 001-004
Comments on Stage 3C Feasibility Study for Site 32/36 Draft Final December 1992
Richard H. Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
11 January 1993
Comments
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #57 001-004
Review Comments for Draft Proposed Plans for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34, December 1992
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
14 January 1993
Comments
Sites 34, 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE: '
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #58 001-006
EPA Review of Draft Final Feasibility Study for IRP Site 32/36 - December 1992
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
19 January 1993
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #59 001-005
EPA Review of USAF IRP, Draft Proposed Plans for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34 - December 1992
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
21 January 1993
Letter
Sites 34, 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #60 001-004
Additional Review Comments on Draft Proposed Plans for IRP Sites 32/36, Draft Final Feasibility Study for IRP Site
34, Draft Final Feasibility Study for IRP Site 32/36
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
25 January 1993
Comments
Sites 34, 32/36
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #64 001-003
EPA Review of the Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Revised Draft Final Proposed Plans for IRP Sites
32/36 and 34, Pease Air Force Base - March 1993
EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBDA
10 February 1993
Letter and Comments
Sites 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-101
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.1) #68 001404
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
Sage 3B IRP Site 34 Groundwater Treatment Plant ITIR Draft, November 1992
NHDES
Art Ditto, AFBDA
25 January 1993
Comments
Site 34
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONOTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #78 001402
Comments on Proposed Plan for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34
Robert J. Mack, Director
Office of Real Property Management
U.S. Department of State
Art Ditto, AFBDA
29 March 1993
Letter with attachment
Sites 32/36 and 34
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #79 001-003
Proposed Plans for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34, March 1993, Draft Final
George C. Jones, Executive Director PDA
Art Ditto, AFBDA
15 April 1993
Comments
Sites 32/36 and 34
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #80 001403
SCOPE Comments on Proposed Plans for Sites 32/36 and 34
Bradley M. Lown, Chairman, SCOPE
An Ditto, AFBDA
26 April 1993
Comments
Sites 32/36 and 34
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #103 001433
Response to EPA Comments on the Draft Zone 3 RI Report
USAF
EPA
28 September 1993
Rffipome to Comments
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #104 001424
Response to NHDES Comments on the Draft Zone 3 RI Report
USAF
NHDES
29 September 1993
Response to Comments
Zone3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
MK01\RPTK»628026.004\z3nxUpd
D-102
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #112 001-008
Draft Response to EPA Comments on the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Draft Rl/FS Report
USAF
EPA
9 November 1993
Response to Comments
Mclntyre Brook; Lower Newfields Ditch
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #113 001-014
Draft Response to NHDES Comments on the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Draft RI/FS Repon
USAF
NHDES
8 November 1993
Response to Comments
Mclntyre Brook; Lower Newfields Ditch
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #116 001-003
Review of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Comments on Background Data for Pease AFB, NH
Fred Price, Mitre Corporation
Major Charles Howell, AFCEE
11 June 1993
Letter
None
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #117 001-003
Peer Review of Initial Screening of Alternatives, Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Fred Price, Mitre Corporation
Major Charles Howell, AFCEE
2 July 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #126 001-002
EPA Review of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook Sediment Evaluation Work Plan
EPA
USAF
16 November 1993
Fax
PEA (3.3)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #127 001-003
Response to EPA Comments Zone 3 Draft FS
USAF
EPA
22 November 1993
Response to Comments
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-103
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #128 001-012
State Response to Comments Zone 3 Draft Feasibility Study
USAF
NHDES
22 November 1993
Response to Comments
Zone3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION.
PEA (10.1) #131 001-002
Work Plan to Evaluate the Sediments of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
29 November 1993
Comments
Mclntyre Brook; Flagstone Brook
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #135 001-004
Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study Report Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
3 January 1994
Comments
Zone3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #138 001-004
Review Comments, Zooe 3, Draft Fmal Feasibility Study Report
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
3 January 1994
Review Comments
Zone 3; Section 4.2
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #142 001-008
Review Comments, Zone 3 Draft Proposed Plan and Site 32/36 Draft Proposed Plan
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
7 February 1994
Review Comments
Zone 3, Site 32/36; Section 43
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #151001-011
Zone 3 Site 32, Technical Impracticability Evaluation Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Michael Daly, EPA
2 June 1994
Review Comments
Zone 3; Site 32
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\z3rod.»pd
D-104
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #153 001-003
Comments, Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program, Zone 3 RI Addendum #1
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
15 June 1994
Comments
Zone 3; Section 3.5
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TnLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #154 001-001
Response to EPA Comments and Additional Responses to NHDES Comments on the Basewide Interim Monitoring
Plan
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
Mike Daly, EPA
21 June 1994
Response to Comments
None
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #155 001-019
Air Force Response to Comments
USAF
EPA
NHDES
26 August 1994
Response to Comments
None
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #161 001-006
Response to EPA and NHDES Comments on the Basewide Interim Monitoring Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
16 June 1994
Response to Comments
PEA (3.5) #123 001-E34; PEA (3.5) #124 001-007
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #163 001-003
Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Zone 3 JETC Work Plan Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
27 June 1994
Comments
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
PEA (10.1) #166 001-012
Pease AFB Basewide Interim Monitoring Plan, Response to Air Force June 21,1994 Letter
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
21 July 1994
Comments
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-105
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3-5) #121 001-007
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #167 001-003
Regional Groundwater Flow Model
John M. Regan, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
22 July 1994
Comments
Zone 3; Haven Well; Harrison Well; Smith Well
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE "
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT: '
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #174 001-005
Comments to the Zone 3 RI Addendum #2 Report, May 1994
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
01 July 1994
Comments
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #182 001-036
Zone 3 Site 32, Groundwiter Extraction Assessment Letter Report Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
19 September 1994
Comments
Zone 3; Site 32
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #186 001-016
Response to Comments, Zone 3 Addendum #1 and #2
Mark McKeabe, AFBCA
Richard Peace, NHDES
08 November 1994
Response to Comments
Zone3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #189 001422
Response to NHDES Comments on the Air Force's 21 June 1994 Letter Responding to NHDES 23 March 1994
Comments on the Pease AFB Basewide Interim Monitoring Plan
USAF _
NHDES
07 December 1994
Response to Comments
PEA (3.5) #121 001-007; PEA (35) #123 001-E34:
PEA (3.5) #124 001-007; PEA (10.1) #161 001-006;
PEA (10.1) #166 001-012
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-106
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #192 001-003
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report for Pease AFB, NH - Comments
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
11 January 1995
Comments
None
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #193 001-005
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
12 January 1995
Comments
None
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #194 001-5.2
Sediment Bioassay and Hardness Letter Reports Evaluation Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
12 January 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA (3.5) #120 001-008; PEA (11.1)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
PEA (10.1) #196 001-004
Air Force Response to the State's Zone 3 RI Addend urns #1 and #2 Comments - Outstanding Issues
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
19 January 1995
Comments
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #247 001-002
Zone 3 Proposed Plan Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
22 June 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA (43) # 13 001-R.l
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #254 001-008
Clarification of the State's Comments to the Zone 3 Proposed Plan, March 1995
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
11 July 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA (43) # 13 001-R.l
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\23rod.apd
D-107
09/18/95
-------
WJ Commuaity Relations Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.2) #1 001440
Installation Restoiation Program Community Relations Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
January 1991
Community Relations Plan
None
ARF.IR
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.2) #2 i-L.1
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Revised Community Relations Plan
Dynamac Corporation
230 Peachtree St., N.W., Ste. 700
Atlanta, GA 30303
USAF
October 1994
Community Relations Plan
None
ARF
10 J PtUk Notices
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.3) *3 001-001
Paid Advertisement in Portsmouth Herald, for Sites 32/36 and 34 Proposed Plan Public Hearing and Comment
Period.
USAF
Portsmouth Htrald; Public
28 March 1993
Public Notice
Site 32/36; Site 34; PEA (4.3)
ARF (Section 10 J Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (103) *4 001-001
Paid Advertisement in Foster's Daily Democrat for Sites 32/36 and 34 Proposed Plan Public hearing and Comment
Period
USAF
Fetor's Daily Dtmocrar, Public
27 March 1993
Public Notice
Site 32/36; Site 34; PEA (43)
ARF (Section 103 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (103) #11 001-001
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Public Notice Announcing the Signing of Two RODs: Site 34 and Landfill 5
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Local Communities via Tht Portsmouth Herald; Public
4 October 1993
Public Notice
Landfill 5; PEA (S.I)
ARF (Section 103 Binder)
*
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-108
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.3) #16 001-001
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Paid Public Notice in Portsmouth Herald Announcing the Zone 3 and Site 32/36 Proposed Plan Public Hearing
USAF
Public
30 July 1995
Paid Public Notice
Zone 3; Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.3 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.3) #17 001-001
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Paid Public Notice in Foster's Daily Democrat Announcing the Zone 3 and Site 32/36 Proposed Plan Public Hearing
USAF
Public
29 July 1995
Paid Public Notice
Zone 3; Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.3 Binder)
#
Public Meeting Transcripts
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.4) #3 001-025
Pease Air Force Base Public Workshop and Information Meeting: Installation Restoration Program
Dynamac Corporation
USAF
12 January 1993
Meeting Summary
None
IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.4) #4 001-038
Pease AFB Official Transcript of Public Hearing for Proposed Plan for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34
R&R Associates, Inc.
USAF
30 March 1993
Transcript
Sites 32/34 and 36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.4) #5 001-7.4
Summary of Pease AFB Public Hearing on the Proposed Plans for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34
Dynamac Corporation
USAF
30 March 1993
Hearing Summary
Sites 32/34 and 36
ARF (Site 32/36 Shelf)
#
10.5 Documentation of Other Public Meetings/TRC Minutes
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.5) #00 001-004
LONG TrTLE: Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-109
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
USAF
See Distribution List
22 Febniaiy 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #0 001-013
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
30 March 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) *1 001-004
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
27 April 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #2 001-010
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
30 May 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #3 001-008
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
27 June 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
PEA (10.37*4 001-005
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
25 July 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #5 001405
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxU{xl
D-110
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
USAF
See Distribution List
29 August 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #6 001-012
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
26 September 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #7 001-008
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
31 October 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
PEA (105) #8 001-004
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
29 November 1990
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (105) #9 001-003
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
31Januaryl991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
#
PEA (105) #10 001-003
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
27 March 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
PEA (105) #11 001-006
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-lll
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
USAF
See Distribution List
24 April 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTV H:
REQ -NT:
DATE.
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (105) #12 001403
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
28 May 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (105) #13 001406
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
25 June 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TrTE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (105) #14 001-007
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
30 July 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (105) #15 001-007
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
27 August 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
PEA (105) #16 001-010
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
01 October 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
#
PEA (105) #17 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
MKDl\RPT.-00628026.004\z3rc
-------
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
USAF
See Distribution List
29 October 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #18 001-013
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
26 November 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #19 001-005
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
07 January 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #20 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
31 March 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (103) #21 001-002
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
28 April 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (103) #22 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
20 May 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 103 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
PEA (103) #23 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-113
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
USAF
TRC Distribution List
28 July 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10 5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #24 001-005
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
29 September 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SI OND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
PEA (10.5) #25 001-013
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
27 October 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
PEA (10.5) #26 001-004
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
16 December 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) «7 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
17 February 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
PEA (105) #28 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
23 March 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
#
PEA (105) #29 001-006
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review rnmm)tt««
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxUpd
D-114
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
USAF
TRC Distribution List
27 April 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #30 001-006
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
25 May 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #31 001-012
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
29 July 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #32 001-002
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
27 July 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #33 001-008
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
31 August 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
PEA (10.5) #34 001-009
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
28 September 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 105 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #35 001-010
Technical Review Committee Meeting Minutes
MK01\RPT:0062S026.0M\z3rod.apd
D-115
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
USAF
See Distribution List
26 October 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR,
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #36 001-011
Technical Review Committee Meeting Minutes
USAF
See Distribution List
30 November 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #37 001-002
Technical Review Committee Meeting Minutes
USAF
See Distribution List
11 January 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #38 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
1 March 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #39 001-012
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
26 April 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
PEA (105) #40 001-001
January 13,1994, Informal Dispute Resolution Meeting - Final Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
AFBCA/NE
11 April 1994
Memorandum
None
ARF (Section 10 2 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #41 001-013
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
MK01\RrT:00628026.004\i3rod.apd
D-116
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
USAF
TRC/RAB Distribution List
S May 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section IO.S Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #42 001-004
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
USAF
TRC/RAB Distribution List
28 June 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10J) #43 001-013
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
USAF
TRC/RAB Distribution List
26 July 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #44 001-006
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
USAF
TRC/RAB Distribution List
30 August 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #45 001-011
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
USAF
TRC/RAB Distribution List
04 October 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
PEA (10.5) #46 001-010
Pease Air Force Base Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee Meeting Minutes
USAF
TRC/RAB Distribution List
07 February 1995
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #47 001-001
Pease Air Force Base Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee Meeting Cancellation Notice
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-117
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
TRC/RAB Distribution List
28 February 1995
Letter
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #50 001-001
Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC) Meeting Notification
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Pease RAB/TRC
21 April 1995
McmomxiufB
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #51 001-006
Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC) Meeting Notification
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Pease RAB/TRC
16 May 1995
McooTUiduni for Distribution
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
*
PEA (10.5) #52 001-020
RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from June 6,1995
USAF
See Distribution
21 June 1995
Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10S Binder)
#
PEA (10.5) #53 OOUAK2
RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes bom June 6, 1995
USAF
See Distribution List
26 June 1995
Minutes
None
ARF (Section 103 Binder)
#
1ft* Fart Shafts, Fm* Advisories, aad News Rebuts
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.6) #1 001403
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
News Release Regarding the Investigation of 22 Sites on Pease AFB
USAF
Media
30 September 1987
Newt Release
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\i3nxUpd
D-118
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #2 001-002
News Release Regarding Presentation of the Second Interim Technical Report
USAF
Media
21 September 1988
News Release
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #3 001-003
News Release Regarding the Underground Water Sampling Program
USAF
Media
29 November 1988
News Release
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #4 001-002
News Release Regarding the Release of the Third Interim Technical Report
USAF
Media
22 March 1989
News Release
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #7 001-003
Superfund Program Draft Imeragency Agreement Fact Sheet
EPA. Region I
See Mailing List
December 1990
Fact Sheet
PEA (6.2)
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #8 001-008
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update: Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Fact Sheet
USAF
1991 Mailing List
October 1991
Fact Sheet
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
PEA (10.6) #9 001-011
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update Fact Sheet
USAF
1992 Mailing List
December 1992
Fact Sheet
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-119
09/18/9S
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #10 001-004
Pease Ail Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update Fact Sheet: Interim Grouodwater Treatment - Sites
8, 32/36 and 34
USAF •
1993 Mailing List
January 1993
Fact Sheet
Site 8; Site 34: Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #11 001-005
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update Fact Sheet: Underground Storage Tank Program
Overview
USAF
1993 Mailing List
January 1993
Fact Sheet
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #13 001-006
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update Fact Sheet: Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation
USAF
1993 Mailing List
January 1993
Fact Sheet
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder). IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #15 001-009
Proposed Plan for IRP Site 34 (Bldg. 222) Fact Sheet
USAF
See Mailing List
March 1993
Fact Sheet
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
PEA (10.6) #16 001-011
Proposed Plan for IRP Site 32/36 (Bldgs. 113/119) Fact Sheet
USAF
See Mailing List
March 1993
Fact Sheet
Site 34; Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #17 001-001
News Release, Comment Period Opens for IRP Sites 32/36 and 34
USAF
Media
16 March 1993
Newt Release
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rodapd
D-120
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #19 001-002
News Release, Final Plans Issued for Cleanup of Two Sites at Pease AFB
USAF
Media
27 September 1993
News Release
Landfill 5; Site 34
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #20 001-004
Pease AFB Environmental Reporter Volume 1, Number 1
USAF
See Mailing List
January 1994
Quarterly Newsletter
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #24 001-004
Pease AFB Environmental Reporter Volume 1, Number 2
USAF
Mailing List
April 1994
Quarterly Newsletter
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT.
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #27 001-006
Pease AFB Environmental Reporter. Volume 1. No. 3
USAF
Mailing List
August 1994
Newsletter
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder), IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION. ""
PEA (10.6) #30 001-006
Pease AFB Environmental Reporter Volume 1. No. 4
USAF
See Mailing List
December 1994
Newsletter
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder): IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) #35 001-006
Pease AFB Environmental Reporter Volume 2, No. 1
USAF
See Mailing List
March 1995
Newsletter
None
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder); IR
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-121
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.6) #37 001-006
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Petit AFBIRP Update Fact Sheet: Proposed Plan for Zone 3
USAF
See Distribution List
June 1995
Fact Sheet
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder); IR
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.6) #39 001-001
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION: .
Article ia I'otter's Daily Democrat about the Zone 3 and Site 32/36 Proposed Plan Public Hearing
Foster's Daily Democrat
Public
August 1995
Article
Zone 3; Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
#
tt.7
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.7) #2 001405
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Site 34 Responsiveness Summary
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, MHDES
September 1993
Responsiveness Summary
Site 34 (Building 222)
ARF (Section 10.7 Binder)
PEA (5.1) #1 001-12.1 (Site 34 Shelf in ARF)
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (10.7) #8 001-007
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Zone 3 Responsiveness Summary
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA
Gary Lynn, NHDES
August 1995
Responsiveness Summary
Zone 3 ROD
ARF (Section 10.7 Binder)
118
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECnDN AT THIS TIME
1M Technical Renew ConmittM Charter
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxLapd
D-122
09/18/95
-------
10.10 Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE-
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #1 001-001
Letter Regarding Concern about the Hazardous Waste Sites at Pease AFB
Gordon J. Humphrey, U.S. Senate
James F. McGovern, Acting Secretary of the Air Force
24 March 1989
Letter
None
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER; PEA (10.10) #4 001-001
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Submittal Letter for Draft Community Relations Plan for the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR) on Cape
Cod, Massachusetts
Douglas S. Gutro, EPA
Karen Cowden, Roy F. Western, Inc.
19 June 1990
Letter
PEA (10.2)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER; PEA (10.10) #5 001-002
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Impact of Base Closure on Personnel Responsible for the Installation Restoration Program and Public Affairs
Merrill S. Hohman, EPA
Col. James R. Wilson, Pease AFB
27 August 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT: -
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #6 001-001
Impact of Base Closure on Personnel Responsible for the Installation Restoration Program and Public Affairs (Your
Letter, August 27,1990)
USAF
Merrill S. Hohman, EPA
11 October 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
PEA (10.10) #7 001-001
Submittal of Primary Documents (Community Relations Plan)
USAF
Jim Brown, EPA
24 October 1990
Letter
PEA (10.2)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
PEA (10.10) #8 001-001
Submittal of Primary Documents (Community Relations Plan)
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 October 1990
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-123
09/18/95
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Letter
PEA (10.2)
ARP (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER; PEA (10.10) #9 001-001
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Community Relations Plan Development Extension
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
17 January 1991
Letter
PEA (102)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONC TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #10 001-001
Community Relations Plan Development Extension
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 January 1991
Letter
PEA (103)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
PEA (10.10) #11 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Documents
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
5 February 1991
Letter
PEA (3.1); PEA (3.3)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
PEA (10.10) #12 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Documents
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
5 February 1991
Letter
PEA (3.1); PEA (33)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG HUE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #13 001-001
Community Relations Plan
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
12 April 1991
Letter
PEA (107)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
PEA (10.10) #14 001-004
Basewide ARARs Pease AFB, NH 03803, January 1993, Draft - Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
1 April 1993
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\i3rodjpd
D-124
09/18/95
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Letter
PEA (4.1)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTILE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #22 001-011
Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report Draft, April 1993 — Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
20 May 1993
Letter
Zone3
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
PEA (10.10) #23 001-008
Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Draft, April 1993 - Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
24 May 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
PEA (10.10) #27 001-015
Review of the Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Draft Remedial Investigation Report, Zone 3, Pease AFB.
April 1993
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
26 May 1993
Faxed Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #28 001-004
Review of the Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Draft Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study, April 1993
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
26 May 1993
Faxed Letter
Zone 3
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
#
PEA (10.10) #31 001-001
1RP Documents
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Ronald Gehl, SCOPE Technical Advisor
23 March 1994
Letter
Site 8, Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
PEA (10.10) #35 001-001
Draft Final Community Relations Plan
USAF
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-125
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
EPA
NHDES
13 July 1994
Letter
PEA (10.2) #3
ARJF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #36 001-001
Site 32/36 Groundwater Extraction Letter Report
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Ronald Gehl, SCOPE Technical Advisor
NHDES
13 July 1994
Letter
Site 32/36
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #38 001-005
Cost of Cleanup at Pease Air Force Base
Richard Pease, NHDES
Peter Breseiano, Vice-President SCOPE
19 August 1994
Letter
Zonel
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxLapd
D-126
09/18/95
-------
11.1 EPA Headquarters Guidance
' NOTE; Gaiotaeedocnawnts listed as bibliographic sources for a otarawntal^
separately in this index.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #1 001-003
Risk Assessment Issue Paper for Carcinogenicity Characterization for Trichloroethylene (CASRN 79-01-6),
Tetrachloroethyiene (CASRN 127-18-4), and Styrene (CASRN 100-12-5)
EPA
USAF
14 July 1992
Guidance
None
ARF (Section 11.1 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #2 001-G.2
Draft Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision Documents: The Proposed Plan and Record of Decision
Office of Emergency & Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
March 1988
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #3 001-B.9
The RPM Primer An Introductory Guide to the Role and Responsibilities of the Superfund Remedial Project
Manager
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
September 1987
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #4 001-11.1
CERCLA Site Discrepancies to POTWs Guidance Manual
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA Washington, DC
USAF
August 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #5 001-041
Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment
EPA
USAF
February 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-127
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONGTTItE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #6 001-E1
Preliminary Assessment Guidance Focal Year 1988
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF .
January 1988
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #7 001-113
Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC (EPA/540/R-92/009)
USAF
January 1992
Guidance
PEA (10.0)
Arthur Ditto's Office
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #8 001-H.6
Summary Report on Issues in Ecological Risk Assessment
EPA
USAF
February 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
REOPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #9 001-127
Technology Screening Guide for Treatment of CERCLA Soils and Sludges
EPA
USAF
September 1988
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #10 001-F.19
Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA - Interim Final
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
October 1988
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #11 001-103
Final Guidance on Administrative Records for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
1190/91
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-128
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #12 001-R2
Implementing EPA's Groundwater Protection Strategy for the 1990's: Draft Comprehensive State Groundwater
Protection Program Guidance
EPA
USAF
1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #13 001-021
A Handbook for State Groundwater Managers
Office of Water, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
May 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #15 001-F.2
Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision Documents: The Proposed Plan, The Record of Decision, and
Explanation of Significant Differences, The Record of Decision Amendment
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA. Washington, DC
USAF
July 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
PEA (11.1) #16 001-B.12
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pan A) Interim Final
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
December 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION: _
PEA (11.1) #17 001-057
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume D: Environmental Evaluation Manual Interim Final
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
March 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER PEA (11.1) #18 — Deleted
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
PEA (11.1) #19 001-B.2
Superfund Removal Procedures Action Memorandum Guidance
EPA
USAF
December 1990
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-129
09/18/95
-------
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (U.I) #20 001-0
RCRA Orientation Manual
EPA
USAF
1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #21 001-295
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles
EPA
USAF
November 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
*
PEA (11.1) #22 001-017
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated Site Qean-Up Technologies
EPA
USAF
May 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #23 001-023
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publications Describing Alternatives and Innovative Treatment Technologies
for Corrective Action and Site Remediation
EPA
USAF
May 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE-
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (11.1) #24 001-111
Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies
EPA
USAF ~
May 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
PEA (11.1) #25 001-AJO
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Interim Final
USEPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C
USAF
MKDl\RIT:00628026.004\z3stxLapd
D-130
09/18/95
-------
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
August 1988
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #26 001-A.6
Ecological Assessments of Hazardous Waste Sites: A Field and Laboratory Reference Document
USEPA, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C
USAF
March 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
PEA (11.1) #27 001-E8
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections Under CERCLA
USEPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C
USAF
September 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #28 001-E11
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assessments Under CERCLA
USEPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C
USAF
September 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
PEA (11.1) #29 001-A^7
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual
USEPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
USAF
November 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
PEA (11.1) #30 51532-51667
Federal Register Part II. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 300, Hazard Ranking System Final Rule
USEPA
USAF
14 December 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
PEA (11.1) #31 001-054
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B. Development of
Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals)
USEPA, Office of Research and Development
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-131
09/18/95
-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
USAF
December 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #32 001-065
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pan C Risk Evaluation
of Remediation Alternatives)
USEPA, Office of Research and Development
USAF
December 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's. Office
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #33 8813-8865
Federal Register Part D, Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Pan 300, National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan Final Rule
EPA
USAF
08 March 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#•
>NOTE;
1L2 EPA Regional Guidance
G«idaiK« dcosmtirtslistH as bibl*nras^»o«rt*s for a document already w^
separately in this iadex.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (.112) #1 001-C.l
Land Disposal Restrictions Summary of Requirements
EPA, Region 1
USAF
August 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (112) #2 001-107
Supplemental Risk Assessment Guidance for the Superfund Program
EPA R*onl
USAF
June 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
*
MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-132
09/18/95
-------
1L3 State Guidance
•NOTE; Guidance doconents listed as bibliographic!
separately in this index
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (113) #1 001-001
urecs for a doonoent already iadoded in the Administrative Record are MM listed
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER.
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
ENC-WS 410 Groundwater Protection Rules
NHDES
Art Ditto, AFBDA
February 18,1993
Letter
None
ARF (Section 113 Binder)
#
PEA (113) #2 001-B.8
Interim Policy for the Management of Soils Contaminated from Spills/Releases of Virgin Petroleum Products
NHDES
USAF
September 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (113) #3 001-048
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
REOPIEOT:
DATE
TYPE:
Groundwater Protection Rules
NHDES
USAF
February 1993
Guidance
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (113) #4 001-373
New hampshire Rules for the Control of Radiation
NHDES
USAF
April 1983
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE __
AUTHOR: "~
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (113) #6 001-D.7
Guidebook for Environmental Permits in New Hampshire
NHDES
USAF
1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
PEA (113) #7 001-017
List of Standards and Advisory Levels Used by New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services to Evaluate
Drinking Water Quality
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-133
09/18/95
-------
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health Services
Arthur Ditto. AFBCA
7 January 1993
Guidance
None
ARF (Section 11.3 Binder)
*
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (113) #8 001-039
LONGTTTLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, Pan Evn-A 1121
State of New Hampshire
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
12 August 1994
Guidance
None
ARF (Section 11.3 Binder)
*
'NOTE;
Gold*
1L4 Air Force Guidance
Ms listed as bibliographic somes for a document already inchxM in the Administr
i Record art not listed
separately in this
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR.
REOPffiNT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.4) #1 0014124
Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Pease AFB, New Hampshire
Mitre Corporation, Civil Systems Division
USAF
20 June 1990
Letter Report
None
ARF (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.4) #2 001-016
Implementation of Department of Defense (DOD) Policy Guidance on IRP Policy No. 1
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
11 December 1981
Policy/Guidance Document
None
ARF (Section 11.4 Binder)
*
PEA (11.4) #3 001402
Implementation of DOD Policy Guidance on Installation Restoration Plan (IRP), Policy No. 1
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
S March 1962
Policy/Guidance Document
None
ARF (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
PEA (11.4) #4 001-003
Relationship of the IRP to RCRA Enforcement Actions
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
26 December 1985
Policy Document
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-134
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
None
ARF (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE-
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.4) #5 001-002
Guidance for Air Force Installation Compliance with Volatile Organic Compound Regulations
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
8 October 1986
Guidance Document
None
ARF (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR-
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.4) #6 001-003
IRP Decision Documentation Policy
Department of the Air Force*
See Distribution List
25 May 1988
Policy Letter
None
ARF (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.4) #7 001-003
RCRA Facility Assessment Guidance to Installation
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
3 August 1988
Guidance
None
ARF (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER PEA (11.4) #9 001-L3
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Handbook to Support the Installation Restoration Program Statements of Work for Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Studies Version 3.0
Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory Technical Services Division
Pease AFB
May 1989
Handbook
None
Arthur Ditto's Office . ,
DOCUMENT NUMBER PEA (11.4) #11 001-087
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT: ~"
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
Air Force Logistics Command Public Affairs Environmental Guidance
USAF
Pease AFB
March 31, 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER-
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
PEA (11.4) #12 001-DCA1.3
Recommended Sampling Procedures
Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory
Pease AFB
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-135
09/18/95
-------
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
Match 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTILE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.4) #13 001-J.2
Report of the Defense Environmental Response Task Force
Department of Defense
Pease AFB
October 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
PEA (11.4) #14 001-1.5
Initiatives for Accelerating Cleanup at BRAC Installations
Department of Defense
Pease AFB
June 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER: PEA (11.4) #15 - Deleted
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
Le-N'G TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
1LS Technical Sources
PEA (11.5) #1 001-022
Trichloroethyiene in the Groundwater Supply of Pease Air Force Base Portsmouth, NH
U.S. Geological Survey
USAF
1982
Technical Source
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
PEA (11.5) #2 001-080
Geology and Groundwater Resources of Southeastern New Hampshire
U.S. Geological Survey
USAF
1964
Technical Source
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
PEA (US) #3 001-010
Preliminary Wetland Delineation and Evaluation Report for Pease Air Force Base, NH - Draft
The Smart Associates, Environmental Consultants. Inc.
USAF
April 1990
Technical Source
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
#
MKDl\RPT:0062802&004\z3rod.apd
D-136
09/18/95
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER- PEA (11.5) #4 001-222
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR;
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
The Ecology of the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire and Maine: An Estuarine Profile and Bibliography
Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH
USAF
October 1992
Technical Source
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
11.6 Proposed Procedures / Procedures
PEA (11.6) #1 001-005
Risk Assessment Data Ne.eds and Sampling Procedures Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc
EPA; NHDES; USAF
8 March 1991 '
Letter Report
None
ARF (Section 11.6 Binder)
#
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE-
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.6) #2 001-051
Analytical Methods Letter Report - Supplemental Information to Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
23 April 1991
Letter Report
PEA (3.1)
ARF
#
PEA (11.6) #3 001-055
Protocols for Generation of Baseline Risk Assessments for the Pease AFB Sites - Revised
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
July 1991
Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA (11.6) #5 001-002
Disposal of Drill Cuttings From Stage 2 and 3 Investigations
USAF
NHDES
14 August 1990
Procedures
None
ARP-(Section 11.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE
11.7 Correspondence
PEA (11.7) #1 001-006
Letter to EPA Requesting Review and Concurrence of Risk Assessment Data and Sampling Procedure Letter Report
USAF
EPA
20 March 1991
Letter
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd
D-137
09/18/95
-------
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
None
ARF (Section 11.7 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.7) #2 001-002
Letter Concerning Use of Drilling Mud
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
26 December 1990
Letter
None
ARF (Section 11.7 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
PEA(11.7) « 001402
Analytical Methods for Past AFB
Roy F. Weston, lac.
USAF
23 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF (Section 11.7 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE
TYPE
PEA (11.7) *4 001-001
Consolidated Background Values Letter Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
Johanna Hunter, EPA
March 9,1993
Letter Report
SECOND REFERENCE
LOCATION:
None
ARF (Section 11.7 Binder)
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3nxLapd
D-138
09/18/95
-------
12J Privileged Documents (Extractions)
•NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\z3rod.apd D-139 09/18/95
------- |