PB95-963711
                                 EPA/ROD/R01-95/111
                                 March 1996
EPA  Superfund
       Record of Decision:
       Pease Air Force Base,
       Zone 1, NH
       6/26/1995

-------
        Record of Decision
              Zonel
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
            July 1995

-------
                             Table of Contents

 Section                            Title                               Page


         DECLARATION                                                 ix

 I.       SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION                       1

 II.       ZONE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES                  9
         A.  Zone Use                                                    9
         B.  Response Activity                                             14
         C.  Enforcement History                                           16

 III.      COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION                                    17

 IV.      SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE
         ACTION                                                       18

 V.       SUMMARY OF ZONE CHARACTERISTICS                         21
         A.  Soil and Solid Waste                                          22
         B.  Groundwater                                                31

 VI.      SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS                                      50
         A  Data Evaluation and Reduction                                 51
         B.  Human Health Risk Assessment                                 52
         C.  Ecological Risk Assessment                                     57

 VII.      DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES              62
         A.  Statutory Requirements/Response Objectives                       62
         B.  Technology and Alternative Development and Screening              66

VIII.     DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES                                68

 IX.      SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF
         ALTERNATIVES                                                70
         A.  Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment            72
         B.  Compliance with ARARs                                       72
         C.  Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence                         72
         D.  Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment        73
         E.  Short-Term Effectiveness                                       73
         F.  Implementability                                              74
         G.  Cost                                                       74
         H.  State Acceptance                                             74
         I.   Community Acceptance                                        75
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa               hi                               07/19/95

-------
                              Table of Contents
                                (Continued)

 Section                             Title                               Page
 X.       THE SELECTED REMEDY                                       76
         A.  Methodology for Cleanup Level Determination                      76
         B.  Groundwater Cleanup Goals                                    77
         C.  Soil Cleanup Goals                                            78
         D.  Description of Remedial Components                             78

 XL      STATUTORY DETERMINATION                                   83
         A.  The Selected Remedy Is Protective of Human Health and
            the Environment                                              83
         B.  The Selected Remedy Attains ARARs                             83
         C.  The Selected Remedy Is Cost Effective                            84
         D.  The Selected Remedy Uses Permanent Solutions and Alternative
            Treatment or Resource Recovery Technologies to the Maximum
            Extent Practicable                                             85
         E.  The Selected Remedy Satisfies the Preference for Treatment
            That Permanently and Significantly Reduces the Toxicity,
            Mobility, or Volume of the Hazardous Substances as a
            Principal Element                                             86

 XII.      DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES                    87

 XIII.     STATE ROLE                                                   88

 REFERENCES/ACRONYMS                                        R-l/Acr-1

APPENDIX A - TABLES
APPENDIX B - DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE
APPENDIX C - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
APPENDIX D - ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zooelnxU»               IV                              07/14/95

-------
                                   List of Figures

 Figure No.                             Title                                   Page

   1       General Location Map                                                  3

  2       General Zone 1 Location Map                                           5

  3       Distribution of Organics in Soils at LF-2 and LF-4                        23

  4       Source Area Sampling Locations at PCDA.                               29

  5       Distribution of Organics in Water Table Groundwater                     33

  6       Distribution of Organics in Bedrock Groundwater                         35

  7       Area! Extent of Trichloroethene, Tetrachloroethene, and Benzene
          in Groundwater                                                        39

  8       Distribution of Selected VOCs in Groundwater                            41

  9       Distribution of Metals in Groundwater                                   45
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 V                                   07/14/95

-------
                                  List of Tables

 Table No.                             Title                                  Page

  1       Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities                         A-l

  2       Summary of Highest Organics Concentrations in Soils — LF-2            A-11

  3       Summary of Highest Metals Concentrations in Soils — LF-2             A-13

  4       Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organics in Soils — LF-4         A-14

  5       Summary of Highest Metals Concentrations in Soils — LF-4             A-17

  6       Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organics in Water Table
          Groundwater                                                       A-18

  7       Summary of Highest Concentrations of Metals Detected in
          Water Table Groundwater                                           A-20

  8       Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds in
          Deep Bedrock Groundwater                                          A-21

  9       Summary of Highest Concentrations of Metals Detected in
          Bedrock Groundwater                                               A-23

  10      Chemicals of Concern in Site 2 Soil (0 to 2 feet deep)                   A-24

  11      Chemicals of Concern in Site 4 Soil (0 to 2 feet deep)                   A-25

  12      Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Soil (0 to  2 feet deep)                  A-27

  13      Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Soil (0 to  15  feet deep)                 A-29

  14     Chemicals of Concern in Site 2 Groundwater — Water Table            A-31

  15     Chemicals-of Concern in Site 4 Groundwater — Water Table            A-32

  16     Chemicals of Concern in Site 4 Groundwater — Deep Bedrock          A-33

  17     Chemicals of Concern in Site 5 Groundwater — Water Table            A-34

  18     Chemicals of Concern in Site 5 Groundwater — Deep Bedrock          A-36

  19     Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Groundwater — Water Table           A-38

  20     Chemicals of Concern  in Site 44 Groundwater — Deep Bedrock         A-39

MKDl\RPTK»62»026.004\zonelrDd^a                 vi                                  07/14/95

-------
                                  List of Tables
                                   (Continued)

 Table No.                             Title                                  Page
  21      Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium                         A-40

  22      Most Reasonable Maximally Exposed Receptor (RME)/
          Other Primary Potential Receptors                                   A-42

  23      Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices            A-43

  24      Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
          Short-Tailed Shrew, Site 2                                           A-46

  25      Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
          Short-Tailed Shrew, Site 4                                           A-47

  26      Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
          Short-Tailed Shrew, Site 44                                          A-48

  27      Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
          Robin, Site 2                                                       A-49

  28      Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
          Robin, Site 4                                                       A-50

  29      Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices for the
          Robin, Site 44                                                      A-51

  30      Summary of Detailed Alternatives  Evaluation                          A-52

  31      Documentation of ARARs for Groundwater Management of
          Migration — Alternative MM-2 — Limited Action/Natural
          Attenuation and Biodegradation  of Contaminated Groundwater/
          Institutional Controls/GMZ                                          A-53
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 vii                                 07/14/95

-------
                                 DECLARATION

 SITE NAME AND LOCATION
 Pease Air Force Base (Pease AFB), Zone 1, New Hampshire

 STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE

 This decision document presents a selected remedial action designed to protect human and
 ecological receptors at Zone 1, Pease AFB, New Hampshire. Zone 1 includes the following
 sites: Landfill 2 (LF-2), Landfill 3 (LF-3), Landfill 4 (LF-4), Landfill 5 (LF-5), the Bulk Fuel
 Storage Area (BFSA), the Paint Can Disposal Area (PCDA), and the Railroad Tracks
 Herbicides.  However, for reasons outlined in Section n, only LF-2, LF-4, the PCDA, and
 Zone 1 groundwater are addressed in this ROD.  Additionally, three drainageways  have
 received runoff and contamination and have been evaluated in Zone 1 documents. These
 drainageways consist of Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, and the Railway Ditch.

 This Record of Decision (ROD)  document was  developed  in accordance  with the
 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42
 USC Section 9601 et seq.), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
 Act (SARA) of 1986 and the National Contingency Plan (NCP).  Through this document,
 the Air Force plans to remedy the threat to human health, welfare, or the environment
 posed  by  groundwater contamination  in Zone  1.   This decision  is based on the
 Administrative Record for the site.  The Administrative Record for the site is located in
 Building 43 at Pease AFB (61 International Drive). The Administrative Record Index as
 it applies to Zone  1 is provided in Appendix D.

 DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY

The selected remedy at Zone 1  addresses the principal threat posed by the migration of
contaminated groundwater from the LF-5 source area. Implementation of this remedy will
prevent endangerment of public health, welfare, and the environment by allowing natural

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                IX                                  07/14/95

-------
 physical and  chemical attenuation  processes  to  remove  residual  contamination  in
 groundwater.

 The selected  remedy also involves the placement of deed restrictions on  the  use  of
 groundwater in areas of Zone 1 where MCLs are exceeded for the time period during which
 the MCLs are exceeded and long-term environmental monitoring in the zone. In addition,
 a Groundwater Management Zone (GMZ) will be established in accordance with New
 Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) Regulation Env-Ws 410.  A
 GMZ  is the  designation  used  by NHDES  to denote a subsurface  volume  in which
 groundwater contamination associated with a discharge of a regulated contaminant  is
 contained and managed.  The use of the contaminated groundwater is managed typically
 through institutional controls such as deed restrictions, and groundwater is monitored in the
 GMZ.

 No further action under CERCLA is planned for LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA. These sites
 will be closed according to applicable New Hampshire regulations.  LF-5 and the Railway
 Ditch are addressed separately in the Draft LF-5 ROD (G-617). Removal of soil and solid
 waste from  LF-2 and LF-4 and consolidation of this material in LF-5 also  have been
 addressed in the LF-5 ROD. Removal of waste materials from the PCDA was performed
 during an intensive test pit operation at this site and is discussed in the Zone 1 Remedial
 Investigation (RI) Report.  The  two remaining drainageways that have been affected by
 Zone 1 activities (Flagstone Brook  and Pauls Brook) will be addressed in a separate
 drainageways document to be prepared by the Air Force at a later date. The purpose of
 the decision to separate drainageways was to allow additional time to address several
 outstanding issues associated with  the drainageways  and to not delay the actions for the
 remainder of the Zone 1 sites. LF-3 has been addressed in a No Further Action Decision
Document (NFADD) (G-587), which presents the basis for no action. The Railroad Tracks
also have been recommended for no further action in the Railroad Tracks (Site 46) Site
Investigation Letter Report (G-573). In addition, the BFSA is not addressed in the selected
remedy for  the zone because the site has been excluded from  the  amended Federal
Facilities Agreement (FFA) and is being addressed by the Pease AFB Underground Storage

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zooelro
-------
Tank (UST) Management Program. Required actions at the BFSA are being coordinated
with the State of New Hampshire under the UST Management Program.

NHDES concurs with the selected remedy for Zone 1.

STATUTORY DETERMINATION

The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with
federal and state requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the
remedial action, and is cost effective. A review will be conducted by the Air Force, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and NHDES no less than every 5 years after
implementation to ensure that the remedy provided adequate protection of human health
and the environment and will continue to do so.

The foregoing represents the selection of a remedial action by the Air Force and EPA
Region I, with the concurrence of NHDES.

Concur and recommended for immediate implementation:
U.S. Air Force
    	Date:
   Alan K. OlseiJ^^              ~~
   Director, Air Force Base Conversion Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        V \  •     '  V
By: **--* W   \   V	•       Date:  L
   John P. DeViUars
   Regional Administrator
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 xi                                 04/11/95

-------
                       RECORD OF DECISION SUMMARY

 I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION

 Pease Air Force Base (AFB) is a National Priorities List (NPL) site consisting of numerous
 areas of contamination.  This ROD addresses sources of contamination in Zone 1.  Zone
 1 comprises Landfill 2 (Site 2 or LF-2), Landfill 3 (Site 3 or LF-3), Landfill 4 (Site 4 or
 LF-4), Landfill 5 (Site 5 or LF-5), the Bulk Fuel Storage Area (Site 13 or BFSA), the Paint
 Can Disposal Area (Site 44 or PCD A), and the Railroad  Tracks Herbicides (Site 46).
 However, for reasons outlined in Section n, only LF-2, LF-4, the PCDA, and Zone 1
 groundwater are addressed in this ROD. Zone 1 occupies approximately 350 acres on the
 northeastern margin of the former Pease AFB.

 Pease AFB is located in the Town of Newington and the City of Portsmouth, both of which
 are in Rockingham County, New Hampshire.  Pease AFB occupies approximately  4,365
 acres, as shown in Figure 1.  The base is located on a peninsula in southeastern New
 Hampshire bounded on the west and southwest by Great Bay, on the northwest by  Little
 Bay, and on the north and northeast by the Piscataqua River.  The base  is situated
 approximately in the center of the peninsula.

 At the beginning of World War II, an airport at the present Pease AFB location was used
 by the U.S. Navy. The Air Force assumed control of the site in 1951, and construction of
 the facility was completed in 1956. Various quantities of fuels, oils, solvents, lubricants, and
 protective coatings were used at the base over time, and releases of contaminants into the
 environment occurred.

In December 1988, Pease AFB was selected as one of 86 military installations to be closed
by the Secretary of Defense's Commission on Base Realignment and Closure. The base was
closed as an active military base on 31 March 1991.  The New Hampshire  Air National
Guard (NHANG) remains at  the airfield and uses  some  of  the existing facilities.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxUa                 1                                  07/14/95

-------
 The remainder of the base has been divided among the Department of the Interior (DOI),
 the State of New Hampshire's Pease Development Authority (PDA), and the Air Force.

 Although the ultimate disposition/future use of the property has yet to  be determined by
 the PDA, some assumptions have been made concerning future use scenarios for sites in
 Zone 1. The landfills are considered to have restricted future use potential; construction
 of residences will not  occur on the landfills.  Construction of residences could, however,
 occur adjacent to identified source or fill areas.  Roads, parking lots, and open space are
 typical future uses that are reasonable for landfills. The PCDA is located in the NHANG
 restricted-access area.  It is assumed that this area will continue to have restricted access in
 the future.

 Land use in the vicinity of Zone 1 varies.  An off-base commercial and residential area is
 located along Spaulding Turnpike, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the Pease AFB
 eastern boundary and approximately 500 feet north of the northern boundary  of Zone 1.
 The North Ramp is adjacent to Zone 1  to the west.

 Pease AFB is located within the Piscataqua River drainage basin. Drainage flows radially
 away from the peninsula, into Great Bay toward the west, Little Bay to the northwest and
 north, and the Piscataqua River to the east. Little Bay flows into the Piscataqua River at
 the northern end of the peninsula. Great Bay, Little Bay, and the Piscataqua River are all
 tidally influenced. Consequently, these water bodies are subject to semidiurnal water level
 variations.

 Several surface water  pathways  channel surface runoff away from  Zone  1 toward the
 Piscataqua River. The primary surface water pathways at Zone 1 include  Flagstone Brook,
 the Railway Ditch, and Pauls Brook, as shown in Figure 2. Approximately 75% of Zone 1
 is drained by Flagstone Brook and the Railway Ditch, including all of UF-2, LF-4, LF-5, and
the PCDA, and a portion of the BFSA.  Flagstone Brook, below the Railway Ditch
 confluence,  discharges  into the Piscataqua River near  the  General  Sullivan Bridge.
MKDl\RFTKX)6a026.004\zonelnxUa                 2                                   07/14/95

-------
                                                LISTING OF CURRENT IRP SITES
SITE NAME • (AIMtVUTKM)
                                                    STTE NAME • (AIMEVUmON)
                                                                                                       SITE NAMf • (ASBHtVIATIOH)
                                             Si* Fuel Storage Area
                                             Bu**tg410  PCBSp*
                                             Construction Rubbte Dump 2
                                             Muntons Residue Burial A>H
                                             Bum AIM!
                                             PiuB&ook
                                             Flegslone Brook/Railway Oilch
                                             Bu*»ng244
                                             Bu*«nol13
                                             BUk»ng229
                                             BuMng 22?  Jei Engme Test Cell
                                             BuUng226
HMMI1
LandM2
L«ndMI3
linrM5
Landtille
Fire Oepafknenl Traminp. Area t
Fire Depsrhnenl Trammg Araa 2
Consuuction Rubble Dump 1
Leaned Fuel Tank Sludge Disposal Area
FMS Equipment Cleaning Site
Munnons Mainlenanace Area
                                                                                                       AuM HoH>y Stop
                                                                                                       Gdt Course Maintenance Aiea
                                                                                                       Mclmyre Road Drum Disposal Area
                                                                                                       Paint Can Disposal Area
                                                                                                       CM Jet Enojne Test Stand
                                                                                                       RR Tracks HertMCKlet
 ,'AHSi
IGCMA
MRODA
IPCDA.

IOJETS
IRRTH)
                                                                                                       Gott Course Posticida ATM (Mlimf^Slotag*) iGCPA
                                                                                                       EOD Burn Detonation ATM
                                                                                                                ZOIW1
                                                                                                     Stag* 4, Record of Decision
                                                                                                Pwx Air Fore* Ban*. New Hampshire
                                                              Areal extent ol IRP Zone


                                                              IRP Site
                                                                                                                     FIGURE 1
                                                                                                          GENERAL LOCATION MAP

-------
         nQURI2
GENERAL ZONE 1 LOCATION MAP
I

-------
 The southern portion of Zone 1 is drained by Pauls Brook, which flows off base to the
 northeast under the Spaulding Turnpike and discharges into the Piscataqua River.

 Several wetland areas have been identified in Zone 1, and the area of wetlands delineation
 is shown in Figure 2.  On and immediately adjacent to LF-5 are three wetlands:  Wetlands
 XV, XVI, and XVII. Wetlands XVI drains to Flagstone Brook, and Wetlands XV and XVII
 drain to the Railway Ditch.  Surrounding LF-3, between the railroad tracks and Merrimac
 Drive, are Wetlands I, II, III, IV, V, and VI.  Wetlands I, III, IV, and V drain toward
 Merrimac  Drive, and Wetlands  II and VI  drain to the Railway Ditch.  In the northern
 section of Zone 1, there are several wetlands associated with the Railway Ditch and
 Flagstone Brook.  Wetlands VII and VIII are associated with the Railway Ditch until it
 reaches Wetlands IX and joins  Flagstone  Brook through a culvert under the railroad.
 Wetlands X is located north of LF-4 and west of Flagstone Brook and has no identified
 surface water connection to Flagstone Brook.  West of LF-5, Wetlands XIII is immediately
 adjacent to Flagstone Brook,  and a portion of it flows into Flagstone  Brook  near its
 conjunction with Merrimac Drive. According to the New Hampshire  National Heritage
 Inventory (G-395), the headwaters of Flagstone Brook are located near a wetland classified
 as a Southern New England Acidic Seepage Swamp.  This wetland is  dominated by red
 maples, and contains plants not found elsewhere on base or in the area,  and is classified as
 an exemplary wetland.

 Wetlands XIII, which abuts a portion of Flagstone Brook, is a large, forested wetlands area
 containing  several shallow ponds. In addition, Wetlands VI, east of the northern portion
 of Flagstone Brook, is described as an emergent, depressional wetland. Both Wetlands XIII
 and VI are exemplary wetlands.

 Because Pease AFB was a U.S. military installation, the Federal Emergency Management
 Agency (FEMA) did not delineate floodplains at the  base.  Therefore, it is not known
whether Zone 1 is within a 100-year floodplain.  There are no records indicating that
flooding has occurred at Pease AFB.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 7                                   07/14/95

-------
 A more  detailed description of the zone, including  zone geology and hydrogeology, is
 presented in the Draft Final Zone 1 Remedial Investigation (RI) Report (G-623).
MK01\RPT:00628Q26.004\zonelnxUi                  8                                     07/14/9S

-------
 access road leading from Merrimac Drive to the railroad tracks. A detailed summary of the
 results of the investigation at LF-3 is presented in the LF-3 No  Further Action Decision
 Document (NFADD) (G-587). The LF-3 NFADD forms the basis for no action at that site
 under CERCLA, and, as a result, LF-3 is not discussed further in this document.
 LF-4 is  located  south  of Merrimac Drive and  northwest  of LF-5 and encompasses
 approximately 7 acres.  LF-4 was used for the disposal of domestic and industrial refuse
 between 1963 and 1964.   The disposal method used was to trench and cover with clean fill.

 Removal of soil and solid waste fill material from LF-4 and consolidation of this material
 in LF-5 prior to capping and final closure of LF-5 are  addressed in the Draft LF-5 ROD
 (G-617).
LF-5
LF-5 is bordered by Merrimac Drive to the north, an abandoned railroad bed to the east,
Flagstone Brook to the west, the BFSA to the southeast, and the PCDA to the southwest.
LF-5, which is the  largest site in Zone 1, encompasses approximately 23 acres.

Records indicate that LF-5 was used continuously from 1964 to 1975 as the primary base
landfill, although some disposal occurred as late as 1979. Domestic and industrial refuse
reportedly disposed of in the landfill included waste oils and solvents, paints, paint strippers
and thinners, pesticide containers, and empty cans and drums. The landfill also received an
estimated 20,000 gallons of sludge from the industrial waste treatment plant (Building 226
in Zone  3).  Trichloroethene (TCE) was used in the  main shop areas served by the
industrial waste treatment plant, and, consequently, the sludge may have contained TCE
residues.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 10                                  07/14/95

-------
 In addition to receiving  landfill wastes and industrial sludge, sludge from  the  base
 wastewater treatment facility, grass clippings, wood chips, miscellaneous soils, and concrete
 rubble were temporarily stored at the landfill pending ultimate disposal.  A small drum
 staging area used for temporary storage of drums encountered on base, miscellaneous soils.
 and metals was located at  the southern landfill entrance.

 The LF-5 source area has been addressed in a separate ROD, which was submitted to and
 accepted by EPA and NHDES in September 1993. Currently, the LF-5 source area is in the
 remedial design/remedial  action phase of the CERCLA process.  Because  source area
 concerns are being addressed separately, this Zone 1 ROD addresses the managemem-of-
 migration of contaminated groundwater associated with the LF-5 area.
BESA
The BFSA was the main storage area for fuels at the base.  The BFSA encompasses
approximately 16 acres and is located at the northeastern section of the base.  The site is
bordered by Merrimac Drive to the east, LF-3 and LF-5 to the north, and the PCDA to the
southwest.   Currently, the  BFSA contains  two aboveground and  two  USTs.   The
aboveground tanks are surrounded by earthen berms.

The BFSA has been in operation from 1953 to the present.  Major spills were reported to
have occurred at this site in 1963, 1975, and 1980. In March 1993, the BFSA was removed
from the FFA because the sources of contamination at the site were petroleum products,
which are non-CERCLA regulated wastes. Upon removal from CERCLA, the BFSA was
put under the state's jurisdiction, and, as a result, is not discussed further in this document.
However, petroleum product contamination and remediation at the BFSA is being addressed
by the Pease AFB UST Management Program.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.u                 11                                 07/14/95

-------
 PCDA
 The PCDA is a heavily wooded, 9-acre area located primarily between a secondary access
 road to LF-5 and the main access road near the southern end of LF-5. The site is abutted
 by LF-5 to the north, the BFSA to the northeast, the  NHANG complex to the south, and
 the North Ramp to the west.

 The PCDA was reportedly used by both the Air Force and contract painters over a 30-year
 period to store and dispose of drums that contained paint and paint residues.  The Air
 Force Civil Engineering Department may have used this area to  stage and store curbing and
 other roadway maintenance materials. In addition, reports suggest that the area at or near
 the junction of two access roads  to the site  was a common location for burial of waste
 flocculent generated at  the industrial waste  treatment plant. An intensive test pit operation
 (ITPO), including removal of potential contaminant sources such as grossly contaminated
 soil and crushed drums, was  performed in  1992 and is discussed in the Zone  1 RI Report
 (G-623).

 Railroad Tracks

 The railroad tracks traverse from the northeastern corner of the base into Zone 1. In Zone
 1, the tracks pass near LF-2,  LF-3, and LF-5,  and around the BFSA before exiting Zone 1
 at the southwestern boundary of the zone.

 Herbicides were used historically at Pease  AFB to control unwanted vegetation along the
 railroad tracks located in Zones 1  and 3 in the northeastern portion of the  base. Ureabor,
 manufactured by Occidental Chemical Company, was the primary herbicide used along the
 railroad tracks. The last reported use of this chemical was in 1985 or 1986. The site was
 evaluated during the Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation (PA/SI) performed in 1990.
 Upon review of the site history and site sampling data, the Air Force, EPA, and NHDES
concluded that the site  did not warrant inclusion in the FFA as an area of concern and,
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 12                                  07/14/95

-------
 therefore, did not require a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS). As a result,
 the railroad tracks are not discussed further in this document.

 Drainagewavs

 Flagstone Brook is the primary stream draining Zone 1.  It originates from two culverts at
 the northern end of the North Ramp/aircraft parking apron. The western culvert drains
 stormwater from an approximate 20-acre area, which includes the North Ramp/aircraft
 parking apron and the hot cargo holding pad.  The eastern culvert drains stormwater from
 a portion of the North Ramp, the taxiway, the indoor firing range, a small area of industrial
 buildings, and Nashua Avenue.

 Below the confluence of the eastern and western branches, Flagstone Brook flows north
 along the western edge of  LF-5. A small  stream that drains wetlands located west of
 Flagstone Brook discharges into Flagstone Brook near the northern end of LF-5, south of
 Merrimac Drive.  North of Merrimac Drive, wetlands occupy areas on either side of
 Flagstone Brook and discharge into Flagstone Brook downstream, near the base boundary.

 Pauls Brook receives stormwater runoff from the BFSA, the civil engineering maintenance
 area,  and the mobile home park. Pauls Brook begins as an emergent wetlands west of
 Merrimac Drive and flows eastward off base  under Merrimac Drive toward the Piscataqua
 River.
                                                                      »
The Railway Ditch originates in wetlands south of and along a railway spur located in the
 eastern section  of Zone 1.  Both sides of the spur are ditched and collect surface  water
runoff and seepage from wetlands adjacent to the railway. Wetlands and seeps along and
adjacent to LF-2, LF-3, and LF-5 discharge into the Railway Ditch.  At  the point where the
railway crosses Merrimac Drive, the two drainages flow through emergent wetlands, enter
a culvert, and coalesce northeast of Merrimac Drive. Downstream of Merrimac Drive, the
Railway Ditch flows into Flagstone Brook.
MK01\WT:00628026.004\zonelrod.H                 13                                  07/14/9$

-------
 Several outstanding issues associated with the drainageways require resolution prior to
 establishing remedial action remedies. As a result, Flagstone Brook and Pauls Brook are
 not discussed further in this  ROD and will  be addressed separately in a Proposed Plan,
 along with other drainageways at Pease AFB.  Railway Ditch remediation was included in
 the LF-5 ROD.  An additional area of contaminated sediments associated with the Railway
 Ditch that is contiguous to the  sediment  removal area described in the LF-5 ROD was
 identified in the Zone 1 RI and FS Reports.  Because this additional area of the Railway
 Ditch requiring sediment removal is of the same scope as that specified in the LF-5 source
         A
 area ROD and such removal is consistent with the intent and objectives of the LF-5 source
 area ROD, the work necessary to remove these sediments will be conducted as part of the
 LF-5 source area remedial action and is not discussed further in this Zone 1 ROD.

 B.  Response Activity

 In 1983, an Installation Restoration Program (IRP), Phase I Problem Identification/Records
 Search (G-84) was conducted at Pease AFB to assess whether potential hazardous waste
 sites warranted further investigation. Based on the results of that investigation, further study
 was deemed necessary at LF-5.  A Phase  II presurvey was conducted to obtain sufficient
 information to develop a work scope and cost estimate for a more detailed study.  The
 presurvey was submitted to the Air Force in 1984.  Following the presurvey, RIs were
 conducted in accordance with CERCLA, as amended by SARA, at LF-5 and  18 other IRP
 sites at Pease AFB. The investigations in  Zone 1 were conducted  in four stages between
 September 1984  and January  1993.

 The Stage I  investigation  (September 1984  to August 1986) was designed  to identify
 potential impacts of previous  activities on groundwater and surface water quality at Zone
 1.  Field work was performed at LF-2, LF-4, LF-5, and the BFSA.  The results of this
investigation are presented in the IRP Phase II — Confirmation/Quantification, Stage I Final
Report for Pease AFB (G-525) issued in June 1986.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 14                                  07/14/95

-------
 The Stage 2 field investigation (October 1987 to May 1989) focused on characterizing the
 source areas at LF-2, LF-4, LF-5, and the BFSA, and more accurately delineating the extent
 of contamination in soil, groundwater, surface water, and sediment.  The Stage 2 field
 investigation is described in the IRP Stage 2 Draft Final Report for Pease AFB (G-533) and
 Interim Technical Report (ITR) Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 (G-530; G-531; G-536; G-537).

 Stage 3 investigations in Zone 1 focused on LF-5 field work and were conducted between
 September 1989 and October 1990 and between May and November 1991. Groundwater,
 soil, surface water, and sediment sampling occurred during this stage. A wetlands evaluation
 was performed and included assessment and delineation activities.  In addition to these
 investigative tasks, drum removal at LF-5 was conducted as an Interim Remedial Measure
 (IRM) in December 1989.  The Stage 3 field investigation is described in the IRP Stage 3
 LF-5 Site Characterization Summary (G-542),  the Stage 3 Drum Removal at IRP Site 5
 (LF-5) Informal Technical Information Report (G-541), the Stage 3 IRP Site 5 and IRP Site
 8 Column Leaching Study Letter Report (G-551), the IRP Stage 3C Draft Final LF-5 RI
 Report (G-580), and the IRP Stage 3C Draft Final FS Report for IRP Site 5 (G-574).

 Stage 4 activities (May 1991  to January 1993) were performed to further  define the areal
 extent of contamination, to evaluate the potential for contaminant migration, and to provide
 additional data  needed to develop a working conceptual model of the zone.  Field
 investigations were performed at LF-2, LF-4, the BFSA, and the PCDA. The results of the
 Stage 4 activities in Zone 1 are included in the Zone 1 Site Characterization Study (G-590)
 and the Draft Final  Zone 1 RI Report (G-623).

Table 1 in Appendix A provides a  summary of the field investigation activities in Stages 1
through 4.  Data collected during the  latter part of Stage 4 were used to complete  the
baseline risk assessment and  Zone 1 FS Report. A more detailed description of Zone 1
history  is presented in Sections 1 and 2 of the Zone 1 RI Report.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod«                15                                  07/14/95

-------
 C. Enforcement History


 The enforcement history relative to Pease AFB, including Zone 1, is summarized as follows:
       •     In 1976, the Department of Defense (DOD) devised a comprehensive IRP to
             assess and control environmental contamination that may have resulted from
             past operations and disposal practices at DOD facilities.

       •     In June 1980, DOD issued a Defense Environmental Quality Program Policy
             Memorandum (DEQPPM) requiring identification of past hazardous waste
             disposal sites on DOD agency installations. The DEQPPM was issued in
             response to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA),
             and in  anticipation of CERCLA.

       •     On 14  July 1989, Pease AFB was proposed for addition to  the NPL.  The
             effective date of addition was February 1990.

       •     On 24 April 1991, the  Air Force, EPA,  and NHDES signed  the  FFA
             establishing  the  protocol and timetable for  conducting the  RI/FS and
             remedial design/remedial action processes at Pease AFB.
As part of the timetable established in the FFA, the Air Force, in an effort to streamline

activities,  designed a basewide strategy plan for conducting an RI/FS investigation.  This
strategy plan grouped the sites at Pease AFB into seven zones or operable units based on

geographic location, potential receptors, and potential future uses.  RI/FS reports  were

prepared for each zone.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodja                16                                  07/14/95

-------
 III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

 Throughout the history of IRP activities at Pease AFB, the community has been actively
 involved and informed.  EPA, NHDES, and the Air Force have kept the community and
 other interested parties apprised of zone activities through informational meetings, fact
 sheets, press releases, and public meetings.

 In January 1991, the Air Force released a community relations plan that outlined a program
 to address community concerns and keep citizens informed about and involved in remedial
 activities at the base.  This plan was updated and reissued in November 1994.

 Numerous fact sheets have been released by the Air Force throughout the IRP at Pease
 AFB.  These  fact sheets are intended  to keep the public and other concerned  parties
 apprised of developments and milestones in the Pease AFB IRP. The fact sheets released
 to date that concern Zone 1 are summarized as follows:
Fact Sheet
Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Update
Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Update
Summary of LF-5 Source Area Proposed Plan
Revised Summary of LF-5 Source Area Proposed Plan and
Summary of Consolidation Plans for LF-2 and LF-4 into LF-5
Summary of Zone 1 Proposed Plan
Release Date
October 1991
December 1992
January 1993
July 1993
August 1994
A complete information repository containing documents relating to the Pease AFB IRP is
maintained  at  Pease AFB  in Building 43.   An  Administrative Record  containing
correspondence pertaining to the Pease AFB IRP also is located in Building 43 at Pease
AFB. An index of the Administrative Record is maintained at EPA Region I Headquarters
in Boston, Massachusetts.
MK01\RPT.00628026.004\zonelrod.M                 17                                  07/14/95

-------
 IV.  SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE ACTION

 Remediation  at  a Superfund  site  typically involves  activities  to remove or  isolate
 contaminant source materials in conjunction with activities that mitigate migration  of
 contamination through groundwater and/or surface water pathways. This ROD addresses
 both source control  (excluding the LF-5  source area)  and management-of-migration
 measures in Zone 1. The remedial alternative developed for Zone 1 was designed to reduce
 potential human health and environmental risks identified in the risk assessment for Zone 1.
 The results of the risk assessment are presented in the Zone 1 RI Report (G-623) and are
 summarized in Section VI of this ROD along with an evaluation of the exposure pathway
 as presented in the Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report (G-622).

 The risk assessment forms  the  basis for  concluding that contaminants  in  soil  and
 groundwater at LF-2 and LF-4 and in soil at the PCDA do not pose unacceptable  risk to
 human or ecological receptors and that remedial actions under CERCLA are not warranted.
 The risk assessment indicated that risks exist in exceedance of EPA's acceptable risk range
 (10"4 to 10"6 for cancer risks, and a hazard index of less  than 1 for noncancer risks) for
 groundwater at LF-5 and the PCDA, However, further analysis of site-specific conditions
 at the PCDA led to the conclusion that this assessment was overly conservative and that no
 further  remedial action under CERCLA was warranted for PCDA groundwater.  The
 majority of the unacceptable risk posed by human receptor exposure to PCDA water table
 groundwater was attributable to the PCB Aroclor-1260 and  metals.  Yet, as outlined in
 Subsection 2.5.3 of the Zone 1 FS Report  (G-622), Aroclor was detected at the MCL (0.5
 Aig/L) in one sampling round only.  In addition, the metals concentrations contributing to
 total risk were detected at PCDA wells  that had a thin saturated interval.  Consequently,
 groundwater samples from these wells were highly turbid, which resulted in elevated metals
 concentrations not representative  of actual groundwater  quality.  Furthermore,  because
groundwater is not in contact with contaminated PCDA soils most of the year, remaining
soil contamination does not pose a  threat to the underlying groundwater.  Additionally,
given the low yields of wells installed at the PCDA, it is not likely that groundwater could
be used for  consumptive purposes.  Finally, since  the PCDA is located in the NHANG

Mk01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                18                                  07/14/95

-------
 cantonment area, an area served by public water supplies, future residential use of the
 PCDA and human  exposure to PCDA groundwater are unlikely.  For these reasons, no
 further action is proposed for LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA under CERCLA.

 Final closure  of LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA will be performed under state jurisdiction.
 Limited actions, including environmental monitoring, will be conducted at  these sites in
 accordance with NHDES guidelines.  These limited actions are not discussed in this ROD,
 which only addresses those actions required under CERCLA.

 The human health risk assessment indicated that contaminants in groundwater at LF-5 may
 pose a health risk to potential future on-zone residents in excess of EPA threshold criteria.
 To address these potential risks,  the following remedial action objectives (RAOs) were
 developed:
       •     Protect  human receptors from  exposure  (via ingestion and noningestion
             exposure routes) to contaminated groundwater that may present unacceptable
             health risks in exceedance of EPA's risk range.
       •     Comply with  chemical-specific  applicable  or relevant  and  appropriate
             requirements (ARARs) and/or  established  background levels for  spec.ac
             contaminants in groundwater, as appropriate.
To meet these objectives, the Air Force has established zone-specific cleanup levels for
groundwater  (see  Section  X).   Cleanup  goals for groundwater  were established for
contaminants that exceeded either human health risk-based concentrations, regulatory-based
concentrations, or background values.

The remediaf alternative developed for Zone  1  addresses the RAOs associated with
groundwater  at  LF-5.    Management-of-migration activities  address dissolved-phase
groundwater contamination at LF-5 and include contamination within the boundary of LF-5
and contamination that has migrated beyond the LF-5 footprint.
MK01\RPT00628026.004\2onelrod-M                 19                                  07/14/95

-------
 In summary, the remedy provides for:


       •     Natural   attenuation   and   biodegradation   of  residual-contaminated
             groundwater.

       •     Long-term environmental monitoring in Zone 1.

       •     Placement of deed restrictions on the use of groundwater in Zone 1 in areas
             where MCLs are exceeded.

       •     Establishment of a GMZ in Zone 1.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 20                                   07/14/95

-------
 V.  SUMMARY OF ZONE CHARACTERISTICS


 Section 1 of the Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report contains an overview of the Draft Final

 Zone 1 RI Report (G-623). Based on the results of the RI, a working conceptual model was

 developed that incorporates all known data concerning Zone 1 and its vicinity, including

 geologic, hydrogeologic, and analytical data; field measurements; and  visual observations.

 The salient points of the model are summarized as follows:


       •     Several disposal areas exist in Zone 1, including the LF-5 and PCDA areas.

       •     Much of  the Glacial Till (GT) unit has been excavated across  LF-5;
             consequently, the debris is, in places, located directly on top of the shallow
             bedrock, and a direct physical and hydraulic connection exists between the
             overburden and the bedrock.

       •     The sites  located in  Zone 1 have relatively small  amounts  of saturated
             overburden because the sites are located on topographic highs.  Water is
             commonly first encountered in the shallow bedrock.

       •     Relatively small quantities of debris and contaminated soil exist at LF-2  and
             LF-4.

       •     Contaminated soil is a likely source for some of the contaminants that have
             been observed in other matrices in the LF-5 area.

       •     A regional groundwater recharge area exists in the northeastern portion of
             Pease AFB that encompasses the PCDA and Zone 1.  A local water table
             groundwater high, which acts as an enhanced recharge zone,  exists near the
             central portion of LF-5.

       •     Groundwater at LF-5 is contaminated  with  several  different  aromatic
             hydrocarbons (AHCs),  halogenated  hydrocarbons  (HHCs),  semivolatile
             organic compounds  (SVOCs),  metals, and pesticides.

       •     AHCs and HHCs are discharged from groundwater to surface water at  the
            Railway Ditch and Flagstone Brook.

       •     A groundwater plume containing HHCs is migrating east from LF-5.  The
            extent of the halogenated volatile organic compound (VOC) plume east of the
            Railway Ditch is known; the downgradient limit coincides  with wells 5009 and
            6003.

       •     A groundwater plume containing AHCs is present at LF-5. The extent of the
            AHC plume is known and is primarily restricted to the LF-5 site boundary.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zoneltDd^«                 21                                  07/14/95

-------
 The results of the RI as conceptualized are discussed in more detail in the subsections that
 follow.

 A. Soil and Solid Waste
 Source characterization at LF-2 included collection and analysis of soil from three surface
 soil sampling locations and two test pit locations. A total of 13 test pits were excavated, and
 visual observations of the contents were made. All soil samples were submitted for VOC.
 SVOC, pesticide/polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), and metals analyses. In addition, test pit
 samples also were analyzed for chlorinated herbicides and diesel fuels.  The contaminant
 groups identified in LF-2 soil consist of the following:
             Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
             Benzoic acid.
             PCBs.
             AHCs.
             Oxygenated hydrocarbons (OHCs).
             Metals.
The maximum concentration and location for each organic compound detected in soil are
presented in Table 2 (Appendix A). Figure 3 shows the distribution of organics in LF-2 soil.
Table 3 (Appendix A) presents a similar summary for inorganics.

SVOCs were detected in all LF-2 samples collected.  The majority of the SVOCs detected
were PAHs.

Xylene and diethyl ether were the only two VOCs detected at LF-2. Both were detected
at concentrations below laboratory quantification limits.

PCBs (Aroclor-1248 and -1254) were detected at one location at LF-2. The sample was
collected from soil associated with a trash layer. However, the source of PCBs in this area
was not identified, and PCBs were not detected in any other soil samples collected at LF-2.

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodja                 22                                   07/14/95

-------
I LEOCNO: SO*. OMMNCS
                    Total - serm-volaata organic compound  nvoc
                    Total-voMla organic compound      Tvoc
                    Pevoleum hydrocarbon               me
anon (mg>g)|Duc*cat«]  Tola). p^^u^ hydrocarbon          T»n
                    Diesel range petroleum hydrocarbon     Oil*
                                                     •fir
                    Chtonnalad herbicides               cuw
                    Polycnlonnaled biphen
                   F 2 sampling location
                  LF-4 sampling location
                  Concentration (mo/kg)
                  Cnwnical class
   LEOCNO: BASE MAP FEATURES
   ^^  floaosloavedl       *x  Surface contour elevation
         —"*•"      x-*0    |Ft,MSLI  10 tool mterval

                            •. Marsny area

                              Surface water drainage
                                 O  Surface wrl sampling location
                                 e  Test pn location
\
                                                                                           &
                                                                                                    (CM.E MFCiT
                                                                                                                        »•• g* pnoroof wt>n«nc
                                                                                                                            pnoroof wt>n«nc
                                                                                                                            n« prwDet^iv
                  Zonel
       Sutge 4, Record ol Decision
 Peese AirForce Base, New Hampshire
                FIGURES
DISTRIBUTION OF ORGAJIfiS IN SOILS
    AT LANOFN.L-2 i

-------
 No pesticides, chlorinated herbicides, or diesel fuels were detected in LF-2 soil samples.

 In addition, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis of soil from one

 test pit location did not result in concentrations above TCLP limits.
 Characterization of LF-4 source materials involved excavation of nine test pits. Soil samples

 were collected from four of these test pits at depths ranging from 0 to 1.5 feet below ground
 surface (ft BGS) to 11 to 13 ft BGS. In addition, seven surface soil locations were sampled.

 Soil  samples  were  submitted  for VOC, SVOC, pesticide/PCB,  and metals analyses.
 Additionally, test pit soil samples were analyzed for chlorinated herbicides and diesel fuels.

 One  sample was analyzed for TCLP hazardous waste characterization under RCRA.


 The contaminant groups identified in LF-4 soil include the following:
             PAHs.
             Phthalates.
             Phenols.
             Nitrogenated SVOCs.
             Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs).
             Diesel fuel.
             Benzoic acid.
             Pesticides.
             PCBs.
             AHCs.
             OHCs.
Tables 4  and 5  (Appendix A) provide the maximum concentrations  of organics and

inorganics detected at LF-4 and their locations. Figure 3 shows the distribution of organics

in soil at LF-4.


VOCs present  in LF-4 soil  included chlorobenzene,  1,4-dichlorobenzene,  toluene,

ethylbenzene,  xylenes (total), and diethyl ether.  All VOCs were detected at  very low

concentrations, either below or just above laboratory quantification limits.  The highest total



MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 25                                   07/14/95

-------
 VOC concentration of 0.95 mg/kg was detected in the sample from test pit location 9069.
 VOCs were not detected in the TCLP leachate sample (9068).

 PAHs were present in all LF-4 soil samples, with the highest total PAH concentration (32.8
 mg/kg) detected in test pit 9067.  A total of 12 PAHs were detected at concentrations above
 background levels.  Phthalates were detected at levels below both laboratory quantification
 limits and background  levels.   Phenols  also were  detected  at levels  below laboratory
 quantification limits. Benzoic acid was detected at surface soil locations 3012 through 3017,
 in surficial samples from test pits 9066 and 9067, and in subsurface samples from all LF-4
 test pits.  No benzoic acid soil concentrations detected at LF-4 exceeded background or
 laboratory quantification limits.  SVOCs were not detected in the TCLP leachate sample
 from location 9068.

 Low levels of the pesticides 4'-DDT, 4'-DDD, 4'-DDE, and lindane were detected in three
 LF-4 surface soil samples.  PCBs (Aroclor-1232, -1242, and -1254) were detected in LF-4
 test pit samples, but were not detected in surface soil samples.  Neither pesticides nor PCBs
 were detected in the TCLP leachate from sampling location 9068.

 TPHs were detected at levels above basewide background (240 mg/kg) at five of the nine
 surface soil locations sampled.  Diesel-range TPHs were  detected at  locations 9068  and
 9069. The maximum detected TPH concentration (34.2 mg/kg) also was at location 9069.

 Seven metals were detected at concentrations exceeding background levels. Metals results
 for TCLP leachate at location 9068 were all within acceptable TCLP regulatory criteria.
The nature and extent of source material contamination and source area remediation at
LF-5 are discussed extensively in the Draft Final LF-5 RI Report (G-580), Draft Final LF-5
FS Report (G-574), Draft Final LF-5 Proposed Plan (G-506), and Draft Final LF-5 ROD
(G-617). Therefore, further discussion of LF-5 is not presented here.

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.M                 26                                  07/14/95

-------
 PCDA
 Characterization of the contaminants detected in PCDA soil has included the following tasks
 presented in chronological order:

       •     Collection of four surface soil samples during the 1990/1991 PA/SI (G-553).
       •     Excavation of 10 test pits (9001 through 9010) during the preliminary test pit
             operation, and collection and laboratory analysis of 12 soil samples from seven
             of the 10 test pits in May 1991.
       •     Excavation of 24 test pits during the ITPO, and  collection and laboratory
             analysis of 45 soil samples from the test pits during the summer of 1992.

 Figure 4 depicts  the PCDA source  area sampling locations.  Soil samples from each
 sampling location were analyzed for VOCs,  SVOCs,  pesticides/PCBs, and metals.  Soil
 samples from selected locations were analyzed for herbicides and TPHs.

 Surface soil analytical results indicated the presence of the VOC trichlorofluoromethane at
 low concentrations at locations 313 and 316. Several PAHs were detected at location 317,
 in a drum sludge sample.  Fluorene also was detected at location 314. TPH concentrations
 exceeded background at locations 313, 316,  and 317.  Metals  detected at levels above
 background  in PCDA surface soil samples were  lead, chromium,  barium,  iron, and
 manganese.

 During the preliminary test pit investigation, the analytical sampling results provided  the
 following data (see Figure 4 for sampling locations):
      •      SVOCs were detected at levels below background in samples from test pits
             9005, 9006, 9007, 9008, and 9010.
      •      Low concentrations of VOCs were detected in soil samples collected from test
             pits 9007 and 9010.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                27                                   07/14/95

-------
       •     TPHs were detected at low concentrations at test pits 9001, 9003, 9005, 9006,
             9007, and 9008. Background TPH levels were exceeded at one location only
             (test pit 9010 at 340 mg/kg).

       •     Lead exceeded background in surficial soil samples collected from test pit
             9008 (178 mg/kg) and test pit 9010 (93.8 mg/kg).

       •     4,4'-DDE was detected at a concentration of 0.017 mg/kg in test pit 9007.
             DDT was detected at a concentration of 0.018 mg/kg in test pit 9008.
An ITPO was performed in 1992, including removal of potential contaminant sources such

as grossly contaminated soil and crushed drums, and is discussed in the Zone 1 RI Report

(G-623). During the ITPO, a total of 43 post-excavation soil confirmation samples were

collected from depths below 2 ft BGS in test pits 9029 through 9049. Analytical results from
ITPO soil sampling are presented in  Appendix A of the Zone 1 Site Characterization

Summary (G-590) and Appendix A of the  Draft Final Zone 1 RI Report (G-623). The

results are summarized as follows:
       •     VOCs were detected in soil samples collected from test pits 9030, 9032, 9033,
             9034,   9035,  9039,  and   9041.     Specific  VOCs   detected  include
             tetrachloroethene   (PCE),   chloromethane,  1,2-dichloroethene,   toluene.
             ethylbenzene, diethyl ether, xylenes, and acetone.  The highest total VOC
             concentrations were detected in samples from test pit 9032 (5.9 mg/kg).

       •     SVOCs did not exceed background concentrations in any of the samples
             collected.  However, low levels of various PAHs  and benzoic acid were
             detected.  The maximum detected total SVOC concentration was detected at
             a depth of 5 ft BGS in test  pit  9029.

       •     The DDE concentration exceeded background in a sample from te*st pit 9039
             (0.02 mg/kg).  DDT was detected at levels below background in samples from
             test pits 9034 and 9035.  PCBs  were not detected at any ITPO  locations.

       •     Herbicide analyses were performed for test pit 9032 only. 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
             was detected at 17 ft BGS (0.02 J mg/kg).

       •     TPHs were detected at low concentrations at  test pits 9029 and 9030. The
             maximum TPH concentration of 16 mg/kg was detected at a depth of 5 ft
             BGS in test pit 9029.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJa                28                                  07/14/95

-------
T   .   .   .
I      f       ?       i   •   r  *    :   :    '   !
                                                                                NEWHAMPStORE    '     '
                                                                              AIR NATIONAL GUARD /
                                                                                  COMPLEX
                  Discrtte suriac* soil sampMdafitWar
                  Soil bamg laaciian/idtnOi*!
            JMA Sampling location •ponuimm only
            — — Zona 1 sits* boundary (PCD*)
                                                                                                                  Zoncl
                                                                                                          SMg* 4, Rcoort ot Occtolon
                                                                                                     Pww Air Fore* But, N*w Hmpchlra
                                                                                                                FIGURE 4
                                                                                                 SOURCE AREA SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                                                                ATPCOA
                         LEGEND: BASE MAP FEATURES
                              »'"•  Surtac* comour/tl«vKtion{FT/MSL)
                              90    10 loot innni1
                                   Aircraft VMS • North Ramp
                                   Roads lasptialvpand)
                               : : : Om»t roads and oai»
                                 BuHdings     ••-*• Fanes

-------
       •     Numerous metals were detected in all  ITPO test pits at levels  below
             background.
 During the ITPO, approximately 660 tons of contaminated soil and source materials that
 posed potential risks to PCDA groundwater were  excavated and temporarily stored at
 designated  locations  at  LF-5,  before  being transported off-site  to  an  approved
 treatment/disposal facility.

 B.  Groundwater

 A detailed discussion of the distribution of groundwater  contamination in Zone 1 is
 presented in Subsection 4.3 of the Draft Final  Zone 1 RI Report (G-623).  The salient
 points of the discussion are presented in this subsection.

 Because of the close proximity of the Zone  1 sites to  each other, and to aid in  the
 presentation of contaminant distribution in Zone 1 groundwater, groundwater contaminant
 distribution is discussed on a zonewide basis in both the Draft Final Zone 1 RI Report
 (G-623) and the Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report  (G-622). However, LF-5 is considered to
 be the major source of groundwater contamination in Zone 1. Other potential sources of
 groundwater contamination (i.e., LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA) have been determined  to
 require no further action under CERCLA (G-501; G-617; G-574). Groundwater beneath
 these sites will be addressed under State of New Hampshire landfill closure regulations.
 Therefore, the selected remedy discussed in Section X of this ROD is intended to  address
 only the Zone 1 groundwater beneath LF-5.  However, because both the Zone-1 RI Report
 (G-623) and the Zone 1 FS Report (G-622) provide descriptions of Zone 1 groundwater
 contamination-on a zonewide basis, a similar discussion is presented here.

 Naturally occurring discontinuities in aquitard lithologic units in Zone 1 have resulted in a
 single, relatively thin water-bearing unit, which includes the shallow bedrock.  As a result,
 the overburden and shallow bedrock are referred to herein as the water table unit.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxJ.sa                 31                                   07/14/95

-------
 Zonewide distribution of total aromatic and total halogenated VOCs and total SVOCs in
 water table groundwater is presented in Figure 5.  Distribution of these compounds in
 bedrock groundwater is presented similarly in Figure 6.

 The VOC plumes identified in the LF-5 RI Report (G-580) included an HHC plume, which
 illustrates the distribution  of TCE and PCE, and one AHC plume, which illustrates the
 distribution of benzene. These compounds were chosen because concentrations of these two
 exceed Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) at LF-5; the two compounds also are
 relatively widespread in site groundwater.

 The results of total and soluble metals analyses were compared to one another and to  field
 turbidity values measured at the time of sampling.  Field turbidity values, recorded at the
 time of sampling,  were used to determine which metals groundwater samples (total or
 soluble) appear to be most representative of groundwater quality in Zone 1.

 A summary of the groundwater contamination findings, as presented  in the LF-5 RI Report
 (G-580), is as follows:
             TCE  and PCE originate from  an unidentified source  south  of  the  drum
             removal area near well 502.
             One benzene plume appears to originate in the vicinity of the central trench
             area.
             SVOCs were present at low concentrations in wells 567, 604, 605, 630, and
             6005 in the vicinity of the central trench area.
             Low concentrations of the pesticides delta-BHC, endosulfan-1,  or 4,4'-DDD
             were detected in samples from wells 605, 606, and 629 in LF-5.
             Dissolved arsenic has been detected in wells located in the vicinity of the
             central trench area.
A discussion of Stage 4 analytical data, and relevant historical analytical data, is presented in
Subsection 4.3 of the Draft Final Zone 1 RI Report (G-623).  Analytical results from wells 502,
5007, 5008, and 6105 at the BFSA are discussed in the RI Report because they help define the
extent of one or more contaminant plumes.  All other data collected to assess groundwater
quality in the BFSA are presented in the BFSA Site Investigation Report (G-669).

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 32                                   07/14/95

-------
                                          Simpta uMd tor lowing
LEGEND: BASE MAP FEATURES
        AM ii 0(1 traM • nonh wnp
         FIGURES
MSTRIBUTION OF ORQAMCS IN
WATER TABLE QROUNOWATER
     ::: omwrawto«rdmo

-------
                                          NEWHAMPSMRE
                                        AIR NATIONAL OUARD
        NORTH
190 W) MO «00
     KALEMFEET
LEGEND: BASE MAP FEATURES
     ..... ~- Ajrcnft wu • null > rvnp
     = RomUt (uphalvpmd)
     : r - Ottwr toacB and nih
   r^ BuJOmgi   ^
                                                              Bu* boundwy
            Zon*1
    Stag* 4, Record of Owstoton
    I AlrForo* B*M, Nn» Hampdiii*
          FIGURES
D6TRIBUTION OF ORGANICS IN
  BEDROCK GROUNOWATER

-------
 Zone 1 Water Table Flow Unit

 A total of 32 wells monitor the water table flow unit (including overburden and shallow
 bedrock)  beneath Zone  1.  Twenty-three of these monitor wells are completed in the
 overburden; nine monitor wells are completed in shallow bedrock.  The compounds present
 in the shallow flow unit include:

             AHCs.                               •     Phenols.
             HHCs.                               •     PCBs.
             OHCs.                               •     Pesticides.
             PAHs.                               •     Metals.
             Phthalates.

 A summary of the highest concentrations detected, the location of the highest detection, and
 a comparison of background and MCLs for organic compounds is presented in Table 6
 (Appendix A). Both nonfiltered (total) and filtered (dissolved) metals results are presented
 in Table 7 (Appendix A).

 The principal water table flow unit VOC plumes in Zone 1  originate from LF-5.  The
 distribution of TCE and PCE in the water table flow unit is defined by monitor wells 502,
 538, 568, and 5007 (see Figure 7).

 Both TCE and PCE have been detected at the highest  concentrations and above MCLs at
 monitor well 502. The maximum concentrations for both compounds at well 502 were 46.0
 Aig/L (October 1990) for PCE and 56.0 ^ig/L (October 1990) for TCE. PCE concentrations
 also exceeded the MCL at monitor well 538 at LF-3.  The highest concentration of PCE
was detected in well 6087 (16 //g/L), which was installed at the PCDA in the area of highest
soil contamination and debris identified and removed during the ITPO.  The  well was
installed to monitor the  water table because two deep bedrock wells were previously
installed  (6001  and 6002) and had  not detected  any  deep  bedrock ground water
contamination.  Only a sample for VOC analysis  was collected during the sampling event
because very  little water  was  in the well.  Well 6087 could not be properly developed
because of extremely slow  recharge. As a result of the inability  to develop well 6087

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 adequately, the subsequent groundwater sample was extremely turbid and is most likely not
 representative of groundwater quality.  These data suggest a nearby HHC source  in the
 southern part of LF-5. Both TCE and PCE have been detected at lesser concentrations in
 deep bedrock groundwater.

 The distribution of benzene is defined by water table monitor wells 502, 567,5014, and 5008
 (see Figure 7).  Historical maximum concentrations have been observed at location 5014
 located in the southwestern corner of the central trench area.  The benzene concentration
 at location 5014 exceeded the  MCL (5  /^g/L);  a benzene concentration of 9.0 /^g/L was
 detected in October 1991.  Benzene concentrations decrease  across LF-5; at water table
 monitor wells 502  and  5008, the  benzene concentrations  are below the laboratory
 quantification limit.  Benzene also has been detected at several well locations that monitor
 deep bedrock groundwater, as shown in Figure 7.

 Six additional VOCs, which have primary MCLs, have been detected in the groundwater at
 LF-5 within the  TCE plume, the PCE plume,  or both.  These  compounds are 1,2-
 trichlorobenzene,  1,2-dichlorobenzene,  cis-l,2-dichloroethene, chlorobenzene,  trans-1,2-
 dichloroethane, and vinyl chloride. These compounds have not been detected consistently,
 and occur  at concentrations below their respective MCLs, with the exception of vinyl
 chloride. This compound  was detected at a maximum concentration of 8.1 /zg/L (October
 1990), which exceeds the MCL (2.0 /^g/L).  Vinyl chloride has not been detected in  other
water table wells.

VOCs (i.e., toluene, methylene chloride, xylenes, ethylbenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and 1,2-
dichloroethane) have been detected in wells located outside the boundaries of the TCE and
PCE  plumes  (see Figure 8).   The  distribution  of these compounds  is  sporadic, and
concentrations, with the exception of methylene chloride, are below MCLs.  As shown in
Figure 8, both TCE and PCE are present at concentrations below laboratory quantification
limits in wells 5011 and 7652, respectively. With the exception of well 05-567, benzene is
not present in wells located outside the ARC plume.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                 38                                   07/14/95

-------
                                                                                   DEEP BEDROCK
LEGEND: QflOUNDWATH FEATURES
                                  Moniw«M«(B«»Bdi)
      O  Monitor •••(Owitunlwi)

-------
LEGEND
            O Monitor w»n (wattr tab*)
            • Monitor well (bedrock)
            O Monitor wall (want UBI« Moapt 509)
            ® Hydrapunch»bonng
                                    IPCEOAI;
Wan daiumuiliuil              TCE Thcnioromwn*
• SamplMVMd tor tcnMnlng  lf2rxA t.ZDcfiloroWriin*
                          Da*
                                                purpOMonhKgnbwnpl.)
                                                                       ^      TncMoro.man.
    T  Tohwn*
   PCE
                                                                    M»PXYl  MAPXyton*

100 100 MO 400
     ^te
^^   /""^f^1*1**
      SCAUMFEET
                                              LEGEND: BASE MAP FEATURES
                                                    ~"™~' AircTBtt VMS • iiuiUi nn^
                         : r I Ottwr ro«ds and nil*
                        C2] Buildings   ^=jŁ- Bn* boundary
                       -«-^  F«ne»     K«)  Manny «M
                            Zoml
                   Stto* 4, RMord of OtcKton
               PMM Air Fora* B*M, Htm HwipsMra
                          FIGURE 8
           DISTRIBUTION OF SELECTED VOC» IN
                      GROUNDWATER

-------
 VOC concentrations in water table wells outside LF-5 are low, generally below laboratory

 quantification limits, and are below MCLs.


 Some of the salient points of metals analysis and field turbidity measurements for wells that

 monitor the water table flow unit are as follows:
             Arsenic, lead, nickel, chromium, beryllium, copper, and zinc exceeded their
             respective background concentrations in total metals analysis.  Total metals
             concentrations above background were detected in numerous wells at LF-5.
             in 2-inch-diameter wells at the PCDA, and in wells 7466 and 509 at LF-4.

             Of these metals, arsenic, nickel, cadmium, and barium exceeded background
             levels in soluble metals analysis.  Wells in which soluble metals exceeded
             background are located in the vicinity of LF-5 and LF-4.

             The wells  that contained several total metals concentrations that exceeded
             background also contained high turbidity, usually in excess of  100 NTU.

             Arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, nickel,  and lead exceeded primary
             MCLs in the total metals analysis.  MCLs were exceeded most often in wells
             located in the southern and central areas of LF-5, and in most wells at the
             PCDA  PCDA area wells are mostly 2-inch-diameter wells with a thin
             saturated interval and tended to be high in turbidity and suspended solids.

             The results of soluble metals analysis indicate that only arsenic, cadmium, and
             nickel concentrations exceeded  MCL guidelines.  Arsenic concentrations
             exceeded the MCL at LF-5 locations 5014, 567, and 5007. Concentrations of
             cadmium at the PCDA (44-7646) and nickel (05-606) exceeded the respective
             MCLs at one  location each.

             Total iron concentrations exceeded secondary MCLs at most Zone 1 monitor
             well locations. Soluble iron concentrations exceeded secondary MCLs at LF-5
             wells 5010,  5014, 5113, and 567;  at PCDA wells 7675 and 6088; and at well
             508 in LF-4. Total manganese concentrations exceeded secondary MCLs at
             most Zone  1 monitor well locations. Soluble manganese exceeded MCLs at
             most LF-5  and PCDA locations, at well 508 in LF-4, and at monitor well 506
             in LF-2.
MK01\RPT:00628026.0M\zonelro
-------
 Soluble metals results tended to exceed background and MCLs within or close to the LF-5
 boundary and at wells that also contain organic chemical contamination.  Soluble metals
 data are believed to be more representative of actual groundwater metals contamination in
 the water table flow unit in Zone 1. Figure 9 shows the locations where total or soluble
 metals exceeded both background and primary or secondary MCLs for wells with turbidity
 values less than 100 NTU. This figure shows that, for groundwater with turbidity values less
 than 100 NTU, the only metals to impact Zone 1 water table groundwater are arsenic, iron,
 and manganese.  Arsenic impacted groundwater at LF-5 location 567.  Iron impacted
 groundwater at LF-5 wells 567, 5010, and 5014; at well 508 in LF-4; and at PCDA locations
 5015 and 6088. Manganese impacted groundwater at LF-5 locations 567 and 5014. Metals
 did not impact water table groundwater at other Zone  1 sites.

 Three chemical classes of SVOCs (i.e., PAHs, phthalates, and phenols) were  detected in
 samples from  the water table unit in Zone 1.  The individual compounds and maximum
 detected concentrations  are presented in Table 6  (Appendix A).   In general, SVOC
 concentrations were low, mostly below quantification limits, and occur sporadically in wells
 across Zone 1.

 Three pesticides and one PCB compound were detected in the water table flow unit, each
 present in only one well:  alpha-BHC (13-5008), heptachlor (13-502), and 4,4'-DDD (05-
 567). The PCB congener Aroclor-1260 (1.8 ug/L) was detected in well  7646 at the PCDA.
 Pesticide concentrations did not exceed MCLs. Aroclor-1260 was detected above the MCL
 in one round only at  a concentration of 0.5 /^g/L in well 44-7646.

 The herbicide 2,4,5-T (Silvex) was detected at  a  concentration  below the laboratory
 quantification limit and below the MCL at location 13-5008 (BFSA) in December 1991.  No
 other herbicides were detected in Zone 1 groundwater.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                44                                   07/14/95

-------
ind background tow*, and had low tMd turtxHty vttuw (< 100 NTU)



O   IM^XM
                               LEGEND: MM MAP FEATURES

                                               HOflh IKJTI^
        RQURE9
ownmuTiON OP MCTALS IN
     OMXJNOWATCR
                                   ::: OVmmdtand

-------
 Deep Bedrock Flow Unit

 A total of 29 monitor wells characterized the deep bedrock flow unit beneath Zone 1.
 Groups of compounds detected in groundwater samples collected from wells completed in
 the deep bedrock flow unit included:

             AHCs;                               •     Phenols.
             HHCs.                               •     TPHs.
             OHCs.                               •     Pesticides.
             PAHs.                                •     Metals.
             Phthalates.

 A summary of highest concentrations, locations of highest detection,  and comparison to
 background levels and MCLs for organic compounds is presented in Table 8 (Appendix A).
 The same information is summarized for unfiltered (total) metals and for filtered (dissolved)
 metals in Table 9 (Appendix A).

 The principal deep bedrock plume in Zone 1 originates from LF-5 (TCE, PCE, and
 benzene). The distribution of TCE and PCE in deep bedrock groundwater is defined by
 wells 604, 625, 6005, 626, and 6003. PCE is more widespread, and present in each of the
 aforementioned monitor wells, with the exception of well 6005. A maximum concentration
 of 5.3  J fjg/L of PCE was detected  in November 1988 in water from well 604.  PCE
 concentrations decrease away from monitor well 604.  At well 6003, located near the Zone
 1 boundary, a concentration of 0.4 J A
-------
 location 502). The maximum concentration of TCE in bedrock was 2.0 ^g/L, detected in
 December 1992 at location 6005. TCE concentrations decrease downgradient.

 The benzene plume that exists in deep bedrock groundwater is restricted to monitor wells
 604,605, 606,630, 6005, and 6006. The primary contamination source appears to originate
 in the vicinity of the LF-5 central trench area. A maximum benzene concentration of 14.0
 Aig/L was detected at monitor well 605 (March 1990). Benzene concentrations generally
 decrease across LF-5, although concentrations of 4.1 /^g/L (monitor well 630) and 4.0 ^g/L
 (monitor well 6005) have been detected.

 VOCs have been detected in wells located outside the boundaries of the TCE, PCE, and
 benzene plumes.  The distribution of these compounds is sporadic, and the concentrations
 do not exceed MCLs.

 The wells  completed within deep bedrock, once  developed, monitor waters that are
 significantly less turbid than those wells completed in the overburden (see Appendix E of
 the Draft Final Zone 1 RI Report).  As a result, fewer primary metals were detected with
 concentrations that exceed background and MCLs. Turbidity values for wells completed in
 the deep bedrock were very low, generally less than 4.0 NTU. The metals arsenic, nickel,
 iron, and manganese impact deep bedrock groundwater at LF-5 (see Figure  9). Arsenic
 impacts bedrock groundwater at LF-5 locations 605, 606, 6005, and 6006.  Arsenic is the
 only primary metal to exceed the background level in total metals analysis.  Nickel impacts
 deep bedrock groundwater at LF-5  well 606.  Iron and/or manganese impact bedrock
 groundwater at LF-5 monitor well locations 605,606,625,630, 6005, and 6006.  These wells
 are located in the vicinity of the central trench and drum removal areas.  Metals do not
 impact deep bedrock groundwater at other Zone 1 sites.

 The SVOC chemical classes identified in Zone 1 groundwater sampling results consist of
 PAHs,  phthalates,  and  phenols.    Individual  compounds and  maximum detected
 concentrations are presented in Table 7 (Appendix A). SVOCs are sporadically distributed
and were detected at low concentrations, generally below laboratory quantification limits.

MKn\RPT:0062M26.«M\zooelro4*»                 48                                  07/14/95

-------
 The pesticides alpha-endosulfan, beta-BHC, delta-BHC, DDT, and 4,4'-DDD were detected
 at low concentrations (below laboratory quantification limits and MCLs) at monitor well 60S
 at LF-5.  Alpha-endosulfan also was detected at low concentrations at LF-5 monitor well
 606.

 TPHs have been detected in one deep bedrock monitor well; a concentration of 0.28 J //g/L
 of TPHs was detected in monitor well 605 in June 1991. TPHs have not been detected in
 other deep bedrock monitor wells in Zone 1.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zoneliod.sa                49                                  07/14/95

-------
 VI.  SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS

 A baseline risk assessment was performed for the various sites and media in Zone 1, and
 is presented in Section 6 of the Draft Final Zone 1RI Report (G-623). The purpose of the
 baseline risk assessment is to evaluate  the potential health risks posed to human and
 ecological receptors  by  exposure to zone-related contaminants.   The risk assessment  is
 intended to provide information that can be used to determine the need for remedial action
 in the zone.

 The risk assessment was performed for all media associated with the IRP sites in Zone  1,
 with the exception of LF-5 soil.  The baseline risk assessment for LF-5 soil is presented in
 the Draft Final LF-5 RI Report (G-580). Human health and ecological risk assessments for
 surface water and sediment in Flagstone Brook and the Railway Ditch and a human health
 risk assessment for LF-5 groundwater also were included in the Draft Final LF-5 RI Report.
 These media were re-evaluated in the Zone 1 RI Report because of the availability of new
 site and background data. Groundwater data were grouped for the risk assessment based
 on the results of the zonewide characterization and  the zone conceptual  model.  Specific
 locations were included  in the data set corresponding to the likely source of detected
 groundwater contaminants Therefore, locations impacted primarily by Site 5 sources were
 included in the Site  5 groundwater data set  (bedrock and/or overburden) even if the
 location was physically located at Site 2 or Site 4.

 Discussion of the  ecological risk assessment  for surface water and sediment in Flagstone
 Brook, the Railway Ditch, and Pauls Brook is not provided here because these areas will
 be discussed in a separate ROD for drainage ditches at Pease AFB.

 The approach and methodology for preparing the risk assessment were originally presented
 in a protocols document submitted to EPA Region I and NHDES (G-568). This document
was subsequently amended based on a meeting among Roy F. Weston, Inc. (WESTON*),
 the Air Force, EPA Region I, and NHDES (G-217), and a revised version was submitted
 (G-601).

MK01\RTr:00628026.00*\zooelro
-------
 The baseline risk assessment is divided into three main subsections:
       •     Data Evaluation and Reduction (Subsection 6.2).
       •     Human Health Risk Assessment (Subsection 63).
       •     Ecological Risk Assessment (Subsection 6.4).
 These subsections  are  presented in the RI Report  and are described briefly in  the
 subsections that follow.

 A.  Data Evaluation and Reduction

 The objectives of the data evaluation and  reduction are to review and summarize  the
 analytical data for each medium and to select the chemicals of concern to be evaluated in
 the risk assessment. The reviewed data include sampling results for soil, groundwater,
 surface water, and sediment collected during Stages 2, 3, and 4 of the IRP.  The chemicals
 analyzed in each medium consist of SVOCs, pesticides/PCBs,  VOCs, and inorganics
 (metals).

 A preliminary data summary was performed on all media data sets. The guidelines followed
 in preparation of the data summary are explained in detail in Subsection 6.2.1 of the Draft
 Final Zone 1 RI Report (G-623).

 Based on the preliminary data summary,  a maximum of approximately 25 to 30 chemicals
 of concern were selected for each data set (G-217) using the following criteria. A chemical
 was eliminated as a chemical of concern  when:
      •     The chemical was detected in fewer than 5% of the samples and was not
             reported at high concentrations based on professional judgment (G-189;
             G-217).
      •     The  chemical  was not  detected  at  a concentration  above  background
             concentrations.  Only inorganic chemicals were  eliminated as chemicals of
             concern  based on a comparison with background.   Although no organic
             chemicals were eliminated based on a background comparison, those organics
             that were not reported at concentrations above background are identified in
                        •
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonel«xlsb                51                                  07/14/95

-------
             the relevant Section 6 and Appendix K tables of the Zone 1 RI Report
             (G-623).
 Final summary tables were prepared for the chemicals of concern in each data set. Unless
 otherwise indicated, the final summary tables contain the following information for each
 chemical: frequency of detection, range of sample quantitation limits, range of averaged and
 detected concentrations, mean concentration (based on the averaged values), and upper
 95% confidence limit of the mean concentration. These summary tables are presented as
 Tables  1Q through  20 (Appendix A).   Table  21 (Appendix A) presents a  summary of
 chemicals of concern by  medium for  all media considered,  except surface water and
 sediment.

 B.  Human Health Risk Assessment

 In accordance with guidance from EPA Region I, the potential risks to human health were
 evaluated separately for each medium  for the  chemicals of concern listed in Tables 10
 through 21. The media that were considered were soil and groundwater. For reasons stated
 in Section n, surface water and sediment in Zone 1 are not addressed in this ROD. The
 soil data were evaluated separately for LF-2, LF-4, and LF-5, and the PCD A.  Soils from
 0 to 2 feet deep were evaluated for each  site.   An additional assessment was made  for
 PCDA soil from 0 to 15 feet deep.  The water table and deep bedrock were evaluated
 separately for each  of the applicable sites in the zone.   The resulting  groundwater risk
 evaluations were for LF-2 water table groundwater, LF-4 water table and deep bedrock
 groundwater, LF-5 water table and deep bedrock groundwater, and PCDA water table and
 deep bedrock groundwater.

 A most reasonable  maximally exposed individual (RME) was selected for each medium
 based on both current and future land and water uses.  The zone is currently inactive.
Future land use in Zone 1 was assumed to continue as industrial, although future residential
development  may occur off base.   The groundwater is not currently used, but could
potentially be used for drinking or other purposes in the future (although this is unlikely
because aquifer yields in parts of the zone are  low and  the residences currently existing
MW)l\RPT:00628026.0a4\zoMliod-ib                  52                                  07/14/95

-------
 adjacent to the base are serviced by public water supplies). The current and nature RMEs
 that were selected for each medium are presented in Table 22 (Appendix A).  This
 subsection briefly  summarizes  the  exposure  pathways evaluated.   A  more thorough
 description is presented in the risk assessment (Subsection 6.3.1 of the Draft Final Zone 1
 RI Report).


 The current use exposure pathways evaluated were as follows:
             Soil — The risk assessment evaluated this pathway for LF-2, LF-4, and the
             PCDA [exposures to LF-5 soil were considered in the Draft Final LF-5 RI
             Report (G-580), LF-5 FS Report (G-574), and LF-5 ROD (G-617)].  For all
             three IRP sites, the maintenance worker was considered as the RME, with a
             trespasser also considered as a potential (although less likely) receptor. The
             exposure scenario assumed for all three sites was contact with the soil at a
             frequency of 6 days per year.  Exposure was assumed to occur via incidental
             ingestion and dermal contact.

             Groundwater — Groundwater in Zone 1 is not currently used. Therefore, no
             RMEs or exposure scenarios were chosen.
Future use exposure scenarios were as follows:
             Soil — This pathway was evaluated for LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA.  The
             maintenance worker was chosen again as the RME for these sites. Because
             future  development of LF-2  and LF-4  is expected to be  limited, future
             maintenance activities for these sites were assumed to occur only 1 day/month
             year-round (i.e., 12 days/year).   For the PCDA, a full-time maintenance
             worker (i.e., 250 days/year)  was assumed.   Building construction  could
             potentially occur at the  PCDA,  and the  site could support  full-time
             maintenance activities.  As with the current exposure scenarios, incidental
             ingestion and dermal contact were considered the likely exposure routes.

             Groundwater — For each hydrologic unit considered, an on-zone resident was
             selected as the future RME (Table 22, Appendix A). The on-zone resident
             was assumed to be exposed to groundwater contaminants 350 days/year for
             30 years (G-225). The exposure routes considered for Zone 1 groundwater
             are both ingestion and noningestion (i.e., showering) routes.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zoneliwt*b                 53                                  07/14/95

-------
 For each pathway evaluated, average and reasonable maximum exposure estimates were
 generated corresponding to exposure to the average and maximum concentrations detected
 in that particular medium.

 Excess cancer risks were determined for each exposure pathway by multiplying the exposure
 level by the chemical-specific cancer factor. Cancer potency factors have been developed
 by EPA from epidemiological or animal studies to reflect a conservative upper bound of the
 risk posed by potentially carcinogenic  compounds (i.e., the actual risk is unlikely to be
 greater than the risk predicted). The resulting risk estimates are  expressed in scientific
 notation (e.g., 1 x 1CT6 for 1/1,000,000)  and indicate (using this example) that an average
 individual is Likely to have 1-in-l-million chance of developing cancer over 70 years as a
 result of site-related exposure as defined for  the compound at the stated concentration.
 Current EPA practice considers cancer risk to be additive when assessing exposure to a
 mixture of hazardous substances.

 A hazard index also was calculated for each pathway as EPA's measure of the potential for
 noncancer health effects. A hazard quotient is calculated by dividing the exposure level by
 the reference dose (RfD) or other suitable benchmark for noncancer health effects for an
 individual compound.  Reference doses have been developed by EPA to protect sensitive
 individuals over the course of a lifetime, and they reflect  a daily exposure level that is likely
 to be without an appreciable risk of an adverse health effect.  RfDs are derived from
 epidemiological or animal studies and incorporate uncertainty factors to help ensure that
 adverse health effects will not occur. The hazard quotient is often expressed as a single
value (e.g., 03), indicating a ratio of the stated exposure as defined to the reference dose
value (in this example, the exposure as characterized  is approximately one-third  of an
 acceptable exposure leyel for the given compound). A hazard quotient is only considered
additive for compounds that have  the  same  or similar toxic endpoint, and the sum is
referred to as the hazard index.  For example, the hazard quotient for a compound known
to produce liver damage should not be added  to a second whose toxic endpoint is kidney
damage.
NOC01\RFT:0062a02&004\zooeliod.*b                 54                                   07/14/95

-------
 The total lifetime cancer risks and total hazard indices are presented by medium in Table
 23 (Appendix A). Where applicable, the cancer risks and hazard indices were calculated
 using three concentrations: the mean, the upper 95% confidence limit of the mean, and the
 maximum. Chemicals that exceeded the 10"6 lifetime cancer risk and/or a hazard index of
 1 also are indicated in each table. The cancer risk posed to the RME for the soil pathway
 was greater than 10"6, but less that 10~5 at one or more exposure concentrations for the
 following scenarios:
       •     For LF-2 soil, the cancer risks ranged from 8 x 10"7 to 2 x 10"6 for current use
             scenarios, and from 2 x 10"6 to 5 x 10"6 for future use scenarios.
       •     For LF-4 soil, the cancer risks ranged from 10"* to 3 x 10"* for future use
             scenarios.
       •     For PCDA soil, the cancer risks ranged from 3 x 10"* to 6 x 10"* in shallow (0-
             to 2-foot-deep) soil, and from 3 x 10r* to 9 x 10"* in deep (0- to 15-foot-deep)
             soil for future use scenarios.
Only the PAHs individually or collectively posed greater than a 10"* risk. Based on only
those chemicals of concern detected above background, current and future use scenario risks
for both shallow and deep soil at the PCDA and for current use scenarios at LF-4 were less
than 10"*.  Although potential risks, based on all chemicals of concern, from exposure to soil
at LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA exceeded the lower limit of the range regulated at hazardous
waste sites, there were no unacceptable human health risks above the EPA threshold criteria
of 10"4, as defined in the Zone 1 Proposed Plan (G-697).  There is no apparent potential for
adverse noncancer health effects posed by exposure to soil at any  of the sites'(all hazard
indices were less than 1). In addition, qualitative  and quantitative evaluations conducted
to assess contaminant leaching potential indicated that leaching of dieldrin and manganese
from PCDA soil to groundwater is of potential concern.  However, PCDA groundwater is
not in contact with contaminated soil most of the year, and recent analytical results from
two PCDA wells indicate that dieldrin was not detected.  Therefore, no remedial objectives
(ROs) were chosen  and no RAOs were established for Zone  1 soil at any of the operable
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 units (OUs) based on potential human health risks posed by exposure to contaminated
 groundwater as a result of leaching from soil.

 Cancer risks based on use of water table groundwater for domestic purposes ranged from
 10"7 for LF-2 to 3 x 10~3 for LF-5 based on filtered samples. Potential cancer and noncancer
 risks above those usually considered acceptable by regulatory agencies (cancer risks greater
 than 10**, and hazard indices greater than 1) were calculated for both LF-5 and PCDA water
 table groundwater.  ROs were chosen and RAOs were established for LF-5 water table
 groundwater, as outlined in Section VR  The majority of the unacceptable risk posed by
 human receptor exposure to PCDA water table groundwater was attributable to the PCB
 Aroclor-1260 and metals.  Yet, as outlined in Subsection 2.5.3 of the Zone 1 FS Report
 (G-622), Aroclor was  detected at  the MCL (0.5 /^g/L) in one sampling round only.  In
 addition, the metals concentrations contributing to total risk were detected at PCDA wells
 that had a thin saturated interval.  Consequently, groundwater samples from these wells
 were highly turbid, which resulted  in elevated metals concentrations not representative of
 actual groundwater quality. Furthermore, because groundwater is not in contact with PCDA
 soil most  of the year, the remaining soil contamination does not pose a threat to  the
 underlying groundwater.  Additionally, given the low yields of wells installed in the PCDA,
 it is not likely that groundwater could be used for consumptive purposes. Finally, since  the
 PCDA is located in the NHANG cantonment area, an area served by public water supplies,
 future residential use of the PCDA and human receptor exposure to the PCDA groundwater
 are unlikely. For these reasons, ROs were not chosen and RAOs were not established for
 PCDA water table groundwater, as described in Section VII.  No unacceptable potential
 cancer or noncancer risks in exceedance of EPA's risk range were noted for LF-2 or LF-4
water table groundwater. Therefore, no ROs or ROAs were established based on human
health risks (see Section VII).

Cancer  risks based on use of deep bedrock groundwater for domestic purposes  were
evaluated  for  LF-5 and  the PCDA only because there were no chemicals of concern
established for  LF-2 and LF-4 deep bedrock groundwater. Cancer risks were 3 x  10*3  for

MK01\RFT.00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 LF-5 and 7 x 10"7 for the PCDA based on maximum concentrations for unfiltered samples.
 Based on these results, only LF-5 deep bedrock groundwater posed potential risks in
 exceedance of EPA's acceptable risk range (10"4 to 10"6 for cancer risks, and a hazard index
 of less than 1 for noncancer risks).  ROs were chosen and RAOs were established for LF-5
 deep bedrock groundwater, as outlined in Section Vn.  No unacceptable risks in exceedance
 of EPA's risk range were noted for LF-2,  LF-4, or  PCDA deep bedrock groundwater.
 Therefore, no ROs or RAOs were established for these OUs based on human health risks
 (see Section VQ).

 C.  Ecological Risk Assessment

 The ecological risk  assessment evaluated the potential adverse impacts  on terrestrial
 organisms inhabiting LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA, and aquatic life living in Flagstone Brook,
 the Railway Ditch, and Pauls Brook. Subsequently, the risks to terrestrial receptors as a
 result of potential  exposure to lead at LF-4 and the PCDA were revised and presented in
 an Addendum to the Zone 1 RI and  FS Reports (G-696).  For the reasons outlined in
 Section n of this ROD, the results of this assessment for Flagstone Brook, the Railway
 Ditch, and Pauls Brook are not presented here. These results will be discussed in a separate
 document. However, since the total hazard indices for certain terrestrial species were based
 in part on ingestion of surface water, surface water in Zone 1 is discussed in this context
 only.

The objectives of the ecological risk assessment were to identify and estimate the potential
impacts associated with the chemicals of concern in Zone 1. The assessment focused on the
potential impacts of the chemicals of concern found in the soil, surface water,  and sediment
to terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna that inhabit, or are potential inhabitants of, the
zone, including Flagstone Brook, the Railway Ditch, and Pauls Brook.

The ecological risk assessment was  performed in two  phases. The results of the original
assessment were presented in the Zone 1 RI Report (G-623).  The original assessment

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJb                57                                   07/14/95

-------
 incorporated overly conservative assumptions that resulted in unrealistically high hazard
 indices for LF-4 and the PCDA. An Addendum to Ecological Risks (G-696) was prepared
 for LF-4 and the PCDA based on more realistic assumptions.  The methodology and results
 of the original assessment and the addendum are provided in the paragraphs that follow.

 The terrestrial species evaluated and their relevant exposure pathways are as follows:

       •     Short-tailed shrew.

                    Incidental  ingestion of  soil as  a result of earthworm  ingestion,
                    burrowing, and preening.
                    Ingestion of earthworms.
       •     American robin.
                    Ingestion of earthworms that may have bioaccumulated chemicals of
                    concern.
                    Ingestion of soil as a result of earthworm ingestion.
                   Ingestion of surface water.
       •     Terrestrial plants.
                   Direct contact with soil.

The potential risk posed to ecological receptors was assessed by comparing estimated daily
doses or medium-specific concentrations to critical toxicity values (CTVs) or appropriate
medium-specific criteria values. Hazard quotients were calculated, by contaminant, for each
receptor by dividing the estimated daily intake by the CTV, or, when medium-specific
criteria were available, concentrations were compared directly to criteria to determine the
corresponding hazard  quotient   Hazard quotients were summed  across all  exposure
pathways for each contaminant, by receptor, to develop specific hazard indices.

A hazard index of less than 1 indicates that adverse effects are not likely to occur,  and no
action is required.  A hazard index of greater than 10 indicates that risks are at a level of
MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro«Ub                 58                                  07/14/95

-------
 potential concern, and may warrant action. A hazard index between 1 and 10 is subject to
 interpretation based on the toxitity of the chemical and the uncertainty in the calculation.
 In addition, the  frequency of  detection and reproducibility  of the data  should  be
 investigated. Whether a remedial action must be initiated should be examined on a site-by-
 site basis, after careful consideration of the levels of the hazard indices compared to the
 possible adverse impacts of remedial action on the ecological habitat (e.g., loss of existing
 wetland communities and other habitats, or increased contaminant migration resulting from
 resuspension of contaminated fine-grained particles).

 The total hazard indices for all ecological receptors are presented in Tables 24 through 29
 (Appendix A).  It is difficult to  determine which contaminant concentrations, mean or
 maximum, most accurately reflect actual exposure concentrations.  Therefore, the hazard
 indices for  ecological receptors  were  calculated using  two concentrations: mean and
 maximum, where available. The following paragraphs provide an overview of the findings
 of the ecological  risk assessment  for Zone 1  and highlight contaminants that contributed
 substantially to the total hazard for each receptor.  In the following paragraphs, the average
 and maximum hazard indices are  presented.

 For the short-tailed shrew, the average and maximum cumulative hazard indices  were as
 follows:
             42 and 12.5 for LF-2.
             1 x 104 and 3.3 x 104 for LF-4.
             1.4 x 104 and 4.2 x 10* for the PCDA.
For the American robin, the average and  maximum cumulative hazard indices were as
follows:   -
      •     1.0 and 20.6 for LF-2.
      •     153 and 438 for LF-4.
      •     184 and 435 for the PCDA.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxl.sb                 59                                   07/14/95

-------
 Nearly all of the risk to the shrew at LF-2 (93%) is due to the ingestion of earthworms.
 The contaminant contributing the majority of the total hazard (71%) was phenanthrene.
 Benzo(a) anthracene, which contributed 23% of the maximum cumulative hazard index, was
 the only other chemical with a maximum hazard index greater than 1 (2.9).  Selection of
 ROs and screening of remedial technologies for LF-2 soil were not performed as part of the
 Draft Final Zone 1FS Report in part because the mayimym hazard quotient for the shrew,
 while exceeding 1, was in a range in which the necessity of remedial action was questionable
 given the uncertainty associated with the method used to derive risk values. In addition, the
 hazard quotients calculated for the robin are attributable to ingestion of surface water from
 the Railway Ditch, which will be addressed in a separate document. Therefore, LF-2 has
 been proposed for no further action under CERCLA, and will be closed in accordance with
 state landfill closure  regulations.

 The primary contributor to the cumulative risk to both the shrew and the robin at LF-4 and
 the PCDA (greater than 90%) is the ingestion of earthworms. In addition, the contaminant
 contributing the majority of the maximum cumulative hazard (98% for  the shrew and 49%
 for the robin at LF-4, and 99% for the shrew and 64% for the robin at the PCDA) was lead.
 There  is a great deal of  uncertainty associated with the calculation of bioaccumulation
 factors for lead in earthworms. Selection of ROs and screening of remedial technologies
 for LF-4 and PCDA soil were not initially performed for the Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report
 in pan because  the  nunrimiim hazard quotient for the shrew, while exceeding 1, was
 questionable, given the uncertainty associated with the calculation of bioaccumulation
 factors for lead in earthworms.

 In addition, potential risks to the short-tailed shrew and the robin at LF-4 and the PCDA
 as a result of exposureto lead in soil were  revised  and presented in the Addendum to
 Ecological Risks for LF-4 and the PCDA (G-696). In the addendum, three key assumptions
 used in the calculation of ecological risks at Pease AFB were modified based on additional
 information.  The modifications were as follows:

       •     Initially, it was assumed that ecological  receptors were continuously exposed
            to contaminant concentrations  equivalent to  the  maximum concentrations
MK01\RPT.-00628026.004\a>oelro
-------
              observed at the site. For lead, it was assumed that the shrew and the robin
              were exposed to lead concentrations of 138 and 178 mg/kg, respectively.
              However, when it was noted that lead concentrations exceeded background
              for only one of 10 samples at LF-4 and for two of nine samples at the PCDA,
              a more reasonable assumption of exposure to average lead concentrations in
              soil was made.

              The  bioaccumulation factor  (BAF) used in the  original risk assessment
              (G-623) for both LF-4 and the  PCDA was 11.   However, review  of the
              calculations indicated that a more appropriate BAF was 2.75 (G-696).

              Original earthworm ingestion rates for both the shrew and the robin were
              found to be too  high. Revisions to these ingestion rates in the addendum
              (G-696) resulted in decreases in total estimated dose of approximately 95%
              for both species.
When the revised assumptions were incorporated into the risk calculations, the following

total hazard indices resulted:
             3.3 and 4.5 for the shrew at LF-4 and the PCDA, respectively.
             2.6 and 3.6 for the robin at LF-4 and the PCDA, respectively.
Based on these observations and revised calculations, it was deemed  inappropriate to
proceed with remedial actions based solely on ecological risk. Therefore, LF-4  and the
PCDA have been proposed for no further action under CERCLA, and will be closed in

accordance with state landfill closure regulations.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro«Lsb                 61                                   07/14/95

-------
 VII. DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES
 A.  Statutory Requirements/Response Objectives

 Section 121  of CERCLA  establishes  several statutory requirements and preferences,
 including: (1) remedial actions must be protective of human health and the environment;
 (2) remedial actions, when complete, must comply with all federal and more stringent state
 environmental standards, requirements, criteria, or limitations, unless a waiver is invoked;
 (3) the remedial action selected must be cost-effective and use permanent solutions and
 alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum extent
 practicable; and (4) a preference for remedies in which treatment that permanently and
 significantly reduces the  toxicity, mobility, or volume (TMV) of the hazardous substances
 is a principal element  over remedies not involving such treatment. Response alternatives
 were developed to be  consistent with these mandates.

 Based  on preliminary information relating to the types of contaminants, environmental
 media  of concern, and potential exposure pathways, RAOs were developed to aid in the
 development  and screening of alternatives.  These RAOs were  developed  to mitigate
 existing and  future potential threats to public health via the migration of contaminated
 groundwater.  RAOs for Zone 1 are discussed in this subsection.
The results of the risk assessment conducted during the Zone 1RI (see Section VI) indicate
that there are no unacceptable human health risks above the  EPA threshold criteria
associated with the exposure of current and future potential receptors to soil at LF-2, or the
water table and deep bedrock groundwater beneath LF-2. In addition, the results of the
qualitative and quantitative evaluations conducted to assess the potential for contaminants
to leach to groundwater indicated that only two organics and no inorganics at LF-2 are
predicted to be of potential leaching concern according to the leaching models used.  The
organics chrysene and dibenzo(a4i)anthracene are present in soil at concentrations on the
MK01\RJT:00628026.00«\zooelro(Lrt>                 62                                  07/14/95

-------
 same order of magnitude as the  maximum  allowable concentrations predicted by the
 analysis. Therefore, leaching of contaminants from LF-2 soil is not considered a concern.

 The risk assessment revealed that site soil contaminants posed ecological risks exceeding
 EPA benchmark values. The ecological risk assessment indicated that there is potential risk
 posed to the shrew as a result of ingestion of invertebrates in LF-2 soil.  However, these
 risks were in a range in which the necessity of remedial action was questionable given the
 uncertainty inherent in the derivation of risk values.

 The aforementioned information provides  the basis for concluding that LF-2  soil and
 groundwater do not pose an unacceptable current or potential future threat to human health
 or the environment. Therefore, no RAOs were developed for this site, and no further action
 is proposed under CERCLA for LF-2. Actions will be performed for final closure of the
 site in accordance with NHDES landfill closure requirements. NHDES will have jurisdiction
 over closure activities, and closure plans will be coordinated with the respective NHDES
 divisions, independent of CERCLA and the  FFA.
As discussed in Section VI, the results of the baseline risk assessment for Zone 1 indicate
that no unacceptable current or potential future threat to human receptors would result
from  exposure to contaminants in LF-4  soil, or  the  water table and  deep bedrock
groundwater beneath LF-4.  In addition, the  results of the qualitative and quantitative
evaluations conducted to assess the potential  for inorganic and organic contaminants to
leach to groundwater indicated that LF-4 soil contaminants do not pose a leaching concern.

The risk assessment revealed that site soil contaminants posed ecological risks exceeding
EPA benchmark values.  However, these risks were recalculated in the  addendum and
resulted in a cumulative hazard index of less than 10.  It was determined, based  on  the
recalculated hazard index, that  remedial  action was  not required.   For this  reason,
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJb                63                                   07/14/95

-------
 development of RAOs and screening of remedial technologies were not performed in
 response to the ecological risk assessment results.

 For these reasons, it was concluded that LF-4 soil and groundwater would require no further
 action under CERCLA.   Closure of the site will  proceed under NHDES  guidelines
 independent of CERCLA and the FFA.  Closure activities will be coordinated with the
 respective NHDES divisions, but are not included in this ROD, which addresses only those
 actions that are required under CERCLA.
The human health risk assessment indicated that contaminants in water table and deep
bedrock groundwater at LF-5 may pose a health risk to potential future on-zone residents
in excess of EPA threshold criteria. To address these potential risks, the following RAOs
were developed:

      •     Prevent off-base migration of contaminated groundwater.
      •     Protect human receptors from ingestion of contaminated groundwater that
            may present unacceptable risks in exceedance of EPA's acceptable risk range
            (total cancer risk greater than 10"*, or a total hazard index greater than 1).
      •     Comply with chemical-specific ARARs and/or established background levels
            for specific contaminants in groundwater, as appropriate.
PCDA
The baseline risk assessment conducted during the Zone 1RI (see Section VI) indicates that
PCDA soil does not pose a current or potential threat to human health. Potential risks
above those usually considered acceptable by regulatory agencies were calculated for PCDA
water table groundwater. However, given the low yields of wells installed in the PCDA and
the fact that groundwater is not in contact with PCDA soil most of the year, it is not likely
that groundwater could be used for consumptive purposes. In addition, since the PCDA is
located in the NHANG cantonment area and the fact that the area is served by public water
MK01\RPT«)628026.00<\iooelrodJb                 64                                  07/14/95

-------
 supplies, future residential use  of the PCDA and human receptor exposure to  PCDA
 groundwater are unlikely.

 Qualitative and quantitative evaluations conducted to assess contaminant leaching potential
 indicated that leaching of dieldrin and manganese from PCDA soil to  groundwater is of
 potential concern. However, PCDA groundwater is not in contact with contaminated soils
 most of the year,  and recent analytical results from two PCDA wells indicate that dieldrin
 was not detected.  In addition, waste materials from the PCDA were removed during  the
 ITPO.

 The ecological risk assessment revealed that site soil contaminants posed ecological risks
 exceeding EPA benchmark values. The majority of the risk (90%) is attributable to lead
 exposure, based on estimated concentrations in earthworms that impact the potential risk
 calculated for the  shrew and the robin, the potential receptors. However, lead was detected
 in soil at levels above background in only two of the PCDA locations sampled. It should
 be noted that ecological risks attributed to soil lead concentrations for both receptors were
 revised using more reasonable assumptions regarding exposure and toxicity (G-696). The
 resulting hazard quotients for both species were less than 5. Contaminants contributing the
 remaining 10% of the potential risk were detected at levels above background in only five
 closely spaced locations.  Many of the levels reported above background were within the
 statistical margins of error associated with background levels.

 Based on the aforementioned observations, it was deemed inappropriate to proceed with
 remedial alternatives based on human health and ecological risks.  Therefore, no RAOs for
 PCDA soil or groundwater were developed, and the PCDA is considered to require  no
 further action under CERCLA. Closure of the PCDA will proceed in accordance with state
requirements and will be coordinated with the respective NHDES divisions, independent of
 CERCLA and the FFA.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJb                65                                  07/14/95

-------
 B. Technology and Alternative Development and Screening

 CERCLA and the NCP set forth the process by which remedial actions are evaluated and
 selected.  In accordance with these requirements, a range of alternatives was developed for
 groundwater at Zone 1 that is affected by the LF-5 source area.

 With respect to the management-of-migration of contaminated groundwater in the zone, the
 RI/FS developed a range of three alternatives in which treatment that reduces the TMV
 hazardous substances is  a principal element.  One  alternative involves the removal or
 destruction  of  hazardous substances  to  the maximum  extent feasible,  eliminating or
 minimizing  to  the degree possible the need  for long-term  management.   A second
 alternative includes  natural attenuation processes to clean contaminated groundwater,
 institutional controls to  restrict  the  use of groundwater, and monitoring.   The third
 alternative is the no-action alternative.

 In Section 3 of the Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report, technologies were identified, assessed,
 and screened based on implementability, effectiveness, and cost. These technologies were
 separated into source control  (for Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, and the Railway Ditch)
 and management-of-migration alternatives and were  presented in Section 4 of the Draft
 Final Zone 1 FS Report  The purpose of the initial screening was to narrow the number
 of potential remedial actions for further detailed analysis while preserving a range of
 options. The retained alternatives were then evaluated in detail and screened in Section 5
 of the Zone 1 FS Report

 In summary, all three of the management-of-migration remedial alternatives screened in
 Section 4 of the Zone US Report were retained for detailed analysis. Nine source control
 alternatives pertaining to the drainageways also were retained, but are not discussed in this
ROD, as mentioned  previously in Section n. Alternatives were not developed for LF-2,
LF-4, LF-5, or the PCDA. LF-5 was addressed separately in the LF-5 ROD (G-617). LF-2,
LF-4, and the PCDA are considered to require no further action under CERCLA, but are
to be closed according to applicable New Hampshire  regulations.  As pan of closure, soil

MK01\WT:00628026.004\zoiielro
-------
 from LF-2 and LF-4 was excavated and consolidated on LF-5, as specified in the LF-5 ROD
 (G-617).
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodjb                 67                                    07/14/95

-------
 VIII.  DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES


 This section provides a narrative summary of each management-of-migration alternative that

 was evaluated in detail in Section 5 of the Zone  1 FS Report.  A detailed tabular

 assessment of each alternative is presented in Tables 5.3-1 through 5.3-3 of the Zone 1 FS

 Report


 The alternatives analyzed for Zone 1 are as follows:


       •     Alternative MM-1 — No Action (always considered as required by CERCLA).

       •     Alternative MM-2—Limited Action/Natural Attenuation and Biodegradation
             of Contaminated Groundwater/Institutional Controls/GMZ.

       •     Alternative  MM-3  — Collection  of  Zone 1 Groundwater  with  On-Base
             Treatment using Metals  Precipitation/UV  Chemical Oxidation/Carbon
             Adsorption, On-Base Disposal of Groundwater Through Recharge Trenches,
             and Institutional Controls/GMZ.


 Alternative MM-1 — No Action


 The no-action alternative was evaluated in detail in the Zone 1 FS to serve as a baseline
 for comparison with the other remedial alternatives  under  consideration.  Under this

 alternative, no treatment or containment of groundwater would occur and no action would

 be taken to control potential migration of contaminants in Zone 1 groundwater.
Alternative MM-2  —  Umited  Action/Natural  Attenuat'ftD  9Pd  Biftdegradation  of
Contaminated Gromtdwater/Inttitntional Controls /GMT.
This alternative would consist of the following components:

      •     Natural attenuation and biodegradation of residual-contaminated groundwater
            from the LF-5 source area.

      •     Placement of deed restrictions on future use of groundwater in Zone 1 in the
            vicinity of the LF-5 source area.
MK01\Rrr:00628026.004\zonelRxUb                 68                                 07/14/95

-------
              Establishment of a GMZ in Zone 1 in the vicinity of the LF-5 source area.

              Long-term environmental monitoring in  the zone to  allow the continued
              evaluation of the magnitude of contamination, including groundwater, surface
              water, and sediment sampling and analysis.
       Estimated time for design and construction: None required.
       Estimated period of operation:  Not applicable.
       Estimated capital cost:  $0.
       Estimated operation and maintenance (O&M) cost (net present worth):  $2,054,000.
       Estimated total cost (net present worth):  $2,054,000.
Alternative MM-3 — Collection of Zone 1 Groundwater with On-Base Treatment Using
Metals Precipitation/UV Chemical Oxidation/Carbon Adsorption. On-Base Disposal of
Groundwater Through Recharge Trenches, and Institutional Controls/GMZ
This alternative would consist of the following components:
       •     Extraction of contaminated Zone 1 groundwater and on-base treatment via
             chemical precipitation, UV/chemical oxidation, and carbon adsorption.

       •     On-base recharge of treated groundwater.

       •     Placement of deed restrictions on future use of groundwater in Zone 1 in the
             vicinity of the LF-5  source area.

       •     Establishment of a GMZ in Zone 1 in the vicinity of the LF-5 source area.

       •     Long-term environmental monitoring in the zone to allow the  continued
             evaluation of the magnitude of contamination, including groundwater, surface
             water, and sediment sampling and analysis.
      Estimated time for design and construction:  12 months.
      Estimated period of operation:  30 years.
      Estimated capital cost:  $1,947,100.
      Estimated O&M cost (net present worth): $5,861,400.
      Estimated total cost (net present worth): $7,809,000.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sb                 69                                   07/14/95

-------
 IX.  SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


 Section  121(b)(l)  of CERCLA presents several factors that must be considered when

 assessing alternatives.  Building on these  specific  statutory mandates,  the NCP  has

 promulgated nine evaluation criteria to be used  in assessing  the  individual  remedial

 alternatives.


 A detailed analysis was performed on the alternatives using the nine evaluation criteria to

 select  a site remedy.  This section presents a summary of the comparison of each

 alternative's strengths and weaknesses with respect to the nine evaluation criteria.  These

 criteria are summarized as follows.


 Threshold  Criteria


 The two threshold  criteria described must be met in order for the alternatives to be eligible

 for selection in accordance with the NCP:
       1.     Overall protection of human health and the environment addresses whether a
             remedy provides adequate protection and describes how risks posed through
             each pathway  are  eliminated, reduced,  or  controlled  through treatment,
             engineering controls, or institutional controls.

       2.     Compliance with ARARs addresses whether  a remedy will meet all  of the
             ARARs or other federal and state environmental laws and/or provide grounds
             for invoking a waiver.
Primary Ralanying Criteria


Once an alternative satisfies the threshold criteria, the following five criteria are used to

compare and evaluate the elements of one alternative to another:
      3.    Long-term effectiveness and permanence addresses the criteria that are used to
            assess alternatives for the long-term effectiveness and permanence they afford,
            along with the degree of certainty that they will prove successful.
MK01\RPTK»6»)26.004\ionelKxUb                 70                                  07/14/95

-------
       4.    Reduction of TMVthrough treatment addresses the degree to which alternatives
             use recycling or treatment that reduces TMV, including how treatment is used
             to address the principal threats posed by the site.

       5.    Short-term effectiveness  addresses  the  period of time needed to  achieve
             protection and any adverse impacts on human health and the environment
             that may be posed during the construction and implementation period until
             cleanup goals are achieved.

       6.    ImplementabUity addresses the technical and administrative feasibility of a
             remedy,  including  the  availability of  materials  and  services  needed  to
             implement a particular option.

       7.    Cost includes estimated  capital, O&M, and present-worth costs.
Modifying Criteria
The following modifying criteria are used in the final evaluation of remedial alternatives

generally after public comments on the RI and FS Reports and Proposed Plan are reviewed:
       8.     State acceptance addresses the state's position and key concerns related to the
             preferred  alternative and other alternatives, and  the state's comments on
             ARARs or the proposed use of waivers.

       9.     Community  acceptance  addresses  the public's general  response  to the
             alternatives  described  in  the Proposed  Plan  and RI and FS Reports.
             Community acceptance of the Proposed Plan for Zone 1 was evaluated based
             on written comments and verbal comments received in public meetings during
             the public comment period.
Detailed tabular assessments of each alternative according to the threshold and balancing

criteria are presented in Tables 5.3-1 through 5.3-3 of the Zone  1 FS Report.


Following the detailed  analysis of each individual  alternative, a comparative analysis,

focusing on the relative performance of each analysis against the threshold and balancing

criteria, was conducted.  This comparative analysis is shown in Table 30 (Appendix A).
MK01\Rrr:00628026.004\zonelrod.sb                 71                                  07/14/95

-------
 The following subsections present the nine criteria, including the two modifying criteria not
 discussed in the Zone 1 FS Report; a brief narrative summary of the alternatives; and the
 strengths and weaknesses of each alternative according to the detailed comparative analysis.

 A.  Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment

 Alternatives MM-1 (no action) and MM-2 (limited action) would provide protection over
 the long term because it is expected that cleanup goals would be achieved over the long
 term through natural attenuation and biodegradation processes. Alternative MM-3 involves
 extraction and treatment of contaminated groundwater and, as a result, would likely achieve
 cleanup  goals in  a shorter time frame than Alternatives MM-1 and MM-2, potentially
 decreasing the  duration of monitoring  and institutional controls.  Implementation of
 Alternative MM-3, however, would likely cause impacts on the surrounding wetlands as a
 result of changes in water table  elevation. These impacts  on the wetlands would exist for
 as long as the groundwater extraction system were operational.

 B. Compliance with ARARs

 The no-action alternative would  not comply with ARARs over the short term. Alternative
 MM-2 or MM-3 would comply with all ARARs in the short term. Alternative MM-3 would
 likely attain ARARs sooner than other alternatives  because it involves extraction and
 treatment of groundwater.  However,  the Air Force has modeled the contaminant plume
 and  has  estimated that the ARARs would be achieved in 11 years  through  natural
 attenuation (no treatment) and 5 years through groundwater extraction and treatment.

 C Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence

Alternative MM-2 would provide short- and long-term protection to human receptors by
eliminating  the potential  for   direct   contact  with  contaminated  groundwater via
implementation of institutional controls.  Long-term groundwater monitoring would track
\OC01\RPTKX3628026.004\ajiielrodJb                 72                                 07/14/95

-------
 contaminant levels and would provide early warning of potential contaminant migration
 outside the boundary of the GMZ.

 Alternative MM-3 also would provide short- and long-term protection to human receptors
 by implementation of institutional controls.   However, because this alternative involves
 extraction and treatment of contaminated groundwater, it is likely that contaminant levels
 would be reduced to  acceptable levels in a shorter time  frame than the no-action and
 limited-action alternatives, thereby reducing the required duration of institutional controls
 and monitoring.  Groundwater extraction and treatment also would minimize potential
 impacts from groundwater contaminants to  downgradient surface water, sediment,  and
 wetlands.

 D. Reduction of Toricity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment

 The reduction of TMV for  Alternatives MM-1 and  MM-2 would be through natural
 attenuation processes.   Alternative  MM-3  would reduce the  TMV  of groundwater
 contaminants via extraction and treatment.  However, natural attenuation and groundwater
 extraction and treatment both will reduce the TMV of  groundwater  contaminants in
 relatively short time periods (5 and 11 years, respectively).

 E.  Short-Term Effectiveness

 Implementation of Alternatives MM-1 and MM-2 would not be expected to cause adverse
 impacts on the environment, the surrounding community,  or site workers.  However, there
would continue to be the potential for contaminated groundwater to discharge to surface
water where it could cause potential future risks to ecological receptors.

Implementation of Alternative MM-3 would not be  expected to cause any impacts on the
community  or site workers.   The groundwater treatment plant will use UV  chemical
oxidation, which produces little to no volatile air emissions. However, Alternative MM-3
would  impact the surrounding  wetlands  via  lowering  of the  water table.   Treated

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sb                 73                                   07/14/95

-------
 groundwater would be reinjected to offset these impacts, but the net impact to wetlands
 would remain significant.

 F.  Implementability

 All of the alternatives evaluated are implementable from a technical standpoint and have
 been used successfully at  other sites.   The major difference among alternatives  in this
 category is the length of time necessary to implement the remediation.  From a  regulatory
 perspective, the no-action  alternative would not be implementable because it would not
 comply with federal and state requirements.

 G.  Cost

 The estimated present-worth costs of the alternatives are as follows:
Remedial Alternative
1. No Action
2 Limited Action/Natural Attenuation
«ti«t Biodegradation of Contaminated
Groundwater /Institutional Controls/
GMZ
3. Collection of Zone 1 Groundwater and
On-Base Treatment Using Metals
Precipitation/UV Chemical
Oxidation/Carbon Adsorption, On-
Base Disposal of Groundwater
Through Recharge Trenches, and
IlMttattWfMll r"1fTTr>1f
Capital
Cost
Not costed
SO
$1,947,100
Present-Worth O&M
Cost at Year 30
Not costed
$2,054,000
$5,861,400
Total Present-
Worth Cost
Not costed
$2,054,000
$7,809,000
H. State Acceptance

NHDES has been involved in the environmental activities at Pease AFB since the mid-
1980s, as summarized in Section n. The RI was performed with an Air Force lead, with
NHDES and EPA oversight, in accordance with the FFA.  NHDES has reviewed this
MHn\RPT.00628a26.004\zonelrodJb
74
07/14/95

-------
 document and concurs with the selected remedy.  A copy of the Declaration of Concurrence
 is provided in Appendix B.

 I. Community Acceptance

 The comments received during the public comment period and the public hearing on the
 Zone 1 Proposed Plan are summarized in the Responsiveness Summary (see Appendix C).
 The selected  remedy has not been significantly modified from that presented in the
 Proposed Plan.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxlsb                75                                   07/14/95

-------
 X. THE SELECTED REMEDY

 The selected remedy (Alternative MM-2) involves the removal of groundwater contaminants
 in  Zone  1  in the  vicinity of the LF-5 source area by natural physical  and chemical
 attenuation processes, such as biodegradation, volatilization, and dilution. The remedy also
 includes the placement of deed restrictions on the use of groundwater in a  GMZ and
 monitoring of groundwater in this GMZ. The selected remedy is a comprehensive one in
 that it minimises exposure to site contaminants and attains the overall Zone  1 objectives of
 managing the migration of contaminated groundwater.

 A.  Methodology for Cleanup Level Determination

 Cleanup levels were evaluated for each medium of concern in Zone 1. Cleanup goals have
 been established for chemicals of concern identified in the risk assessment  section of the
 Draft Final Zone 1  RI Report (G-623) and for contaminants detected at levels exceeding
 ARARs, risk-based  concentrations, or background values.

 The approach used to determine risk-based concentrations is consistent with the approach
 used to  evaluate human health risk in the risk assessment section of the Draft Final Zone
 1 RI Report (G-623).  This  approach was originally presented in a  protocols  document
 submitted to EPA Region I and NHDES. This document was subsequently amended, and
 a revised version was submitted. In summary, risk-based concentrations were derived from
 the chemicals of concern in each medium, based on the most reasonable maximally exposed
 human receptor (current or future) for the medium.

 Risk-based concentrations were derived for each noncarcinogenic chemical in a medium
 based on a goal of a hazard index of 1. For each carcinogenic chemical, the concentrations
were derived based on a goal of 10* (1-in-l-million) lifetime cancer risk, with the following
exceptions.  Some  chemicals, although categorized by EPA as  carcinogens, are not
considered to be carcinogenic through all exposure routes. For example, several metals,
including '•admium chromium VI, and nickel, are not classified as carcinogens through the

MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zoaeliodJb                76                                 07/14/95

-------
 oral exposure route.  Therefore, in deriving risk-based concentrations for a given medium,
 if a carcinogenic chemical was not considered to be carcinogenic through the applicable
 exposure routes, the risk-based concentration for the chemical was based on a hazard index
 of 1 (i.e., noncancer risk).

 Cleanup goals were selected after comparing maximum contaminant concentrations detected
 for each chemical of concern in each medium with appropriate chemical-specific ARARs,
 background values, human health risk-based concentrations, and, if applicable, ecological
 risk-based concentrations.

 In general,  where  ARARs were available and deemed appropriate,  the ARARs were
 selected as cleanup goals. Where ARARs were not available, or if the  basis on which the
 ARAR  was established was not consistent with Zone 1 exposure scenarios, a risk-based
 concentration or background value was selected as the cleanup goal.  When ARARs were
 selected as the cleanup goals, a  human health risk  was calculated  for the ARAR
 concentration.  Cleanup goals were not established for chemicals detected at maximum
 concentrations that were lower  than  appropriate ARARs  or risk-based concentrations.
 Cleanup goals for media in Zone 1 are summarized in the subsections that follow.

 B. Groundwater Cleanup Goals

 The results of the evaluation of the human health risk assessment for groundwater indicated
 that  LF-5  groundwater posed cancer and noncancer risks to future on-zone residents in
 excess of EPA threshold criteria.  A comparison of maximum detected concentrations in
groundwater with ARARs indicated the several chemical-specific ARARs were exceeded.
Therefore,  risk-based  concentrations,  chemical-specific ARARs, and background  levels
 (inorganics only) were evaluated in the development of cleanup goals for LF-5 groundwater.
Based on a similar evaluation of groundwater at LF-2, LF-4, and the PCDA no cleanup
goals were established. Therefore, no further action is proposed for LF-2, LF-4, and  the
PCDA groundwater under CERCLA
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 The  list of groundwater contaminants that were evaluated for establishing groundwater
 cleanup goals was limited to groundwater chemicals of concern at LF-5. The groundwater
 cleanup goal selection  tables on pages 80 and  81 present the  maximum detected
 concentration, chemical-specific ARARs, risk-based concentrations, and the cleanup goals
 established for each contaminant.  Cleanup goals were established for 10 contaminants in
 LF-5 groundwater. Contaminants for which cleanup goals were established consist of six
 organics, one PCB, and three inorganics.

 C Soil Cleanup Goals

 The results of the human health risk assessment indicated that no unacceptable health
 effects (cancer risks greater than 10"4, or hazard indices greater than 1) to human receptors
 resulting from incidental ingestion of, or dermal contact with, contaminated soil at LF-2,
 LF-4, or the PCDA are expected.  At LF-2, LF-4,  and the  PCDA, the ecological risk
 assessment and addendum to the ecological risks (G-696) revealed several soil contaminants
 that posed ecological  risk exceeding  EPA benchmark values;  however, the levels of
 ecological risk posed by detected contaminant concentrations were in a range in which the
 necessity of remedial action was questionable given the uncertainty inherent in calculating
 ecological risk values.

 Based on the preceding information, cleanup goals for soil in Zone 1 are not necessary and
 have not been established.

 D.  Description of Remedial Components

The selected  remedy (Alternative  MM-2) for  Zone 1 will  involve  the  following key
components:
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zon«lrwLtb                 78                                  07/14/95

-------
                    Cleanup Goal Selection - Water Table Groundwater
Chemical
Cleanup Goal
Organic* (fJg/L)
Benzene3
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate"
Dichloroethane (1,1-)*
Tetrachloroethene*
Trichloroethene"
Vinyl chloride*
5.0
6.0
8.1
5.0
5.0
2.0
Pesticides/PCBs (vg/L)
Aroclor-12608
0.5
Inorganics (mg/L)
Arsenic6
Manganese0
Thallium6
0.05
0.942
0.002
'Risk-based value.
"Regulatory-based value.
°Maximum background concentration.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sb
79
07/14/95

-------
                   Cleanup Goal Selection — Deep Bedrock Groundwater
Chemical
Cleanup Goal
Organic* (iJg/L)
Benzene*
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate*
Dichloroethane (1,1-)'
Tetrachloroethene*
Trichloroethene*
5
6
. 8.1
5
5
Inorganics (mg/L)
Arsenicb
"Thallium"
0.05
0.002
 •Risk-based value.
 "Regulatory-based value.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\2onelnxLsb
80
07/14/95

-------
             Natural attenuation andbiodegradation of residual-contaminated groundwater
             in Zone 1 in the vicinity of the LF-5 source area.
             Placement of deed restrictions on future use of groundwater in Zone 1 in the
             vicinity of the LF-5 source area.
             Establishment of a GMZ in Zone 1 in the vicinity of the LF-5 source area.
             Long-term environmental monitoring in the zone to allow the continued
             evaluation of the magnitude of contamination, including groundwater, surface
             water, and sediment sampling and analysis.
Detailed descriptions of the various components follow.

Institutional Controls

Alternative MM-2 involves the establishment of a GMZ and placement of deed restrictions
on the use of groundwater within the GMZ in the vicinity of the LF-5 source area. Deed
restrictions will prohibit the use of groundwater by any current or future landowner(s).
Preventing the use of groundwater will reduce the potential for human receptor contact with
and ingestion of potentially contaminated groundwater. It is expected that these restrictions
will remain in effect until groundwater cleanup goals are achieved.

Environmental Monitoring

A long-term environmental monitoring plan, including groundwater, surface water, and
sediment sampling and analysis, will be implemented to allow for the continued evaluation
of the effectiveness of the selected  remedial action in Zone 1.   Groundwater  will be
monitored to  support the establishment of the GMZ,  and to satisfy state  landfill  closure
requirements (NH Env-Wm 2507.00 et seq.).

Groundwater samples will be collected from monitor wells located at or near the perimeter
of the GMZ. Analytes will include VOCs, SVOCs, and metals. Within the  GMZ, monitor
wells  selected to evaluate the  LF-5  source  area  also will be sampled.  Per CERCLA
guidance, it is assumed that monitoring will continue for 30 years, or until determined
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonel«xljb                81                                  07/14/95

-------
 otherwise  during the SARA  review  process.  However,  the sampling  program will  be
 conducted until cleanup goals are achieved.

 Modifications to the monitoring plan will be expected over time, based on interpretation of
 the analytical results.  In addition,  over the long term, it  is likely that fewer monitoring
 locations would be required because of the effectiveness of the remedial action in removing
 the source materials in LF-5 and eliminating contact of these materials with groundwater.
MK01\RFTK)062a026.004\B»elRxUb                 82                                  07/14/95

-------
 XI.  STATUTORY DETERMINATION

 The remedial action selected for implementation for Zone 1 is consistent with CERCLA
 and the NCP. The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment,
 attains ARARs, and is cost effective.

 A.  The Selected Remedy Is  Protective of Human Health and the Environment

 The remedy at Zone 1 will permanently reduce the risks posed to human health and the
 environment by eliminating, reducing, or  controlling exposures to human and ecological
 receptors through treatment, engineering controls, and institutional controls. Specifically,
 this  will be  accomplished through  the  natural  attenuation  and biodegradation  of
 contaminated groundwater, the establishment of  a GMZ,  and  deed restrictions on
 groundwater use in Zone 1 within the established GMZ.

 B. The Selected Remedy Attains ARARs

 This remedy  will attain all applicable or relevant and appropriate  federal and state
 requirements that apply to Zone 1. Environmental laws from which ARARs for the selected
 remedial action are derived, and the specific ARARs include:

      •    Chemical-specific ARARs.
                   Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).
                   State of New Hampshire Regulations.
      •     Location-specific ARARs.
         -  -      Executive  Order 11888, Protection of Floodplains.
                   Executive  Order  11990  (40 CFR 6, Appendix A), Protection of
                   Wetlands.
                   Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA).
                   State of New Hampshire  Regulations.

MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxljb                83                                 07/14/95

-------
             Action-specific ARARs.
                   Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
                   State of New Hampshire Regulations.
 The basewide ARARs document (G-614) identifies ARARs for Pease AFB and provides
 a detailed discussion of ARARs.  Table 31 (Appendix A) provides a complete list of
 ARARs and to be considered (TBC) criteria for Alternative MM-2, including regulatory
 citations,  requirement synopses, actions  to be taken  to attain  the requirements, and
 determinations as to whether the requirement is applicable, relevant, and appropriate, or
 to be considered.

 C.  The Selected Remedy Is Cost Effective

 The Air Force considers the selected remedy to be cost effective (i.e., the remedy affords
 overall effectiveness proportional to its cost).  Once alternatives that are protective  of
 human health and the environment and that either attain or, as appropriate, waive ARARs
 were identified, the overall effectiveness of each alternative was evaluated by assessing the
 relevant three criteria: long-term effectiveness and permanence, reduction in TMV through
 treatment, and short-term effectiveness.

 A summary of the costs of each remedial alternative follows. All costs are presented in net
 present-worth costs.
Remedial Alternative
1. No Action
2 Limited Action/Natural Attenuation

Groundwater /Institutional
Controls/GMZ
Capital Cost
Not costed
SO
Present- Worth O&M
Cost at Year 30
Not costed
$2,054,000
Total Present-
Worth Cost
Not costed
$2,054,000
MK01\RPT:00628in6-004\zooelrodjb
84
07/14/95

-------
Remedial Alternative
3. Collection of Zone 1 Groundwater and
On-Base Treatment Using Metals
Precipitation/UV Chemical
Oxidation/Carbon Adsorption, On-Base
Disposal of Groundwater Through
Recharge Trenches, and Institutional
Controls/GMZ
Capital Cost
$1,947,100
Present-Worth O&M
Cost at Year 30
$5,861,400
Total Present-
Worth Cost
$7,809,000
 Alternative MM-2 is the most cost effective, and the relationship of its overall effectiveness
 to its cost  is proportional.  A summary of the costs  of key  elements associated  with
 Alternative MM-2 (in net present-worth costs) is presented as follows:
Component of Remedy
Groundwater Sample Collection and Data Reporting
Laboratory Analyses
Monitor Well Maintenance
SARA Review
Total
Present- Worth Cost
$553,600
$1,305,000
$64,700
$130,700
$2,054,000
D. The Selected Remedy Uses Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment or Resource
   Recovery Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable
Once those alternatives that attain or, as appropriate, waive ARARs and that are protective
                                                                »
of human health and the environment were  identified, the Air Force identified the
alternative that uses permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies or resource
recovery technologies to the maximum extent practicable. This determination was made by
deciding which one of the  identified alternatives provides the most favorable balance in
consideration of the following factors: (1)  long-term effectiveness and permanence; (2)
reduction of TMV through treatment; (3) short-term effectiveness; (4) implementability; and
(5) cost.  The balancing test emphasized long-term effectiveness and permanence, the
reduction of TMV through treatment, community and state acceptance, and the preference
MKQl\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxLsb
85
07/14/95

-------
 for treatment as principal element and community and state acceptance. Of the alternatives
 evaluated, the selected  remedy provides the  most favorable  balance of the factors
 considered.

 Alternative MM-3 includes treatment of contaminated groundwater, and,  based  on an
 emphasis on the reduction of TMV through treatment, this alternative  slightly outranks
 Alternatives MM-1 and MM-2. Over the long term, however, it is expected that Alternatives
 MM-1, MM-2, and MM-3 will achieve the same level of reduction in TMV. However, the
 cost of Alternative MM-3 exceeds those of Alternative MM-2 by 500%.
 E.  The Selected Remedy Satisfies the Preference for Treatment That Permanently and
    Significantly Reduces the Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume of the Hazardous Substances
    as a Principal Element
The principal element  of the selected  remedy  is the  management of  groundwater
contamination. Treatment is not the principal element of the selected alternative because
treatment does not significantly reduce the amount of time necessary to achieve cleanup
goals.  Furthermore, treatment is not cost effective, given that reduction in TMV through
natural attenuation is an available option.
MW>l\RFT:oeliaUb                 86                                  07/14/95

-------
 XII. DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

 The Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report (G-622) was submitted in December  1993.  The
 description of Alternative MM-2 was presented in the Zone 1 Proposed Plan (G-697).  No
 changes to the Zone  1  selected  remedy have occurred since issuance of the  Zone 1
 Proposed Plan.
MTOl\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sb                87                                07/14/95

-------
 XIII.  STATE ROLE

 NHDES has reviewed the various alternatives and has indicated its support for the selected
 remedy. NHDES also has reviewed the Zone 1 RI and FS Reports, including the risk
 assessment, to determine whether the selected remedy is in compliance with applicable or
 relevant and appropriate state environmental laws and regulations. NHDES concurs with
 the selected remedy for Zone 1. A copy of the Declaration of Concurrence is provided in
 Appendix B.
MK01\RPT:006M026.004\zonelrodJb                 88                                 07/14/95

-------
                                  REFERENCES

 G-84  CH2MHill. 1984. Installation Restoration Program Records Search for Pease AFB,
       NH.

 G-169 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1988.  "Drinking Water Regulations:
       Maximum Contaminant  Level Goals  and National Primary  Drinking  Water
       Regulations for Lead and Copper." 40 CFR Parts 141 and 142.  Federal Register,
       53(160):31516.

 G-189 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency).  1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for
       Superfund  — Volume I. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A. Interim Final.
       Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.  EPA/540/1-89/002.

 G-217 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency).   1991.  Meeting  among U.S. Air
       Force, Roy F. Weston, Inc., U.S. EPA Region I, and  the State of New Hampshire.
       EPA Region I, Boston, MA  10 September 1991.

 G-225 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1991.  Risk Assessment Guidance for
       Superfund: Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual Supplemental Guidance.
       Standard Default Exposure  Factors.   Interim Final.  Office  of  Emergency and
       Remedial Response. Washington, DC. OSWER Directive 9285.6-03.

 G-262 Gilbert, R.O. 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van
       Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY.

 G-395 New Hampshire Natural Heritage  Inventory.  1990.   An Ecological Inventory of
       Pease AFB. Department of Resources and Economic Development.

 G-501 U.S. Department of the Air Force. 1993.  Installation Restoration Program, Draft
      Proposal Plan for IRP Sites 2 and 4,  Landfill 2 and Landfill 4, Pease AFB, NH.  June
       1993.

 G-506 U.S. Department of the Air Force.   1993.  Installation Restoration Program, Revised
      Draft Final Proposed Plan for IRP Site 5, Landfill 5 -  Source Area,  Pease AFB, NH.
      July 1993.

G-525 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1986.  Installation Restoration Program, Phase II
       — Confirmation/Quantification, Stage 1 Final Report, Pease AFB, NH. June  1986.

G-530 WESTON  (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).   1988. Interim Technical Report No.  1 for the
      Installation Restoration Program Stage 2, Pease AFB, NH.  February 1988.

G-531 WESTON  (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).   1988.  Interim Technical Report No.  2 for the
      Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Pease AFB, NH. August 1988.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.ref               R-l                                07/18/95

-------
 G-533 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1989.  Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2
       Draft Final Report, Pease AFB, NH.

 G-536 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1989. Interim  Technical Report No. 3 for the
       Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Pease AFB, NH.  February 1989.

 G-537 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1989. Interim  Technical Report No. 4 for the
       Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Pease AFB, NH.  April 1989.

 G-541 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1990.  Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3,
       Drum Removal at IRP Site 5 (LF-5) Informal Technical Information Report for Pease
       AFB,NH.  December 1990.

 G-542 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1990.  Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3,
       Landfill 5 Site Characterization Summary Informal Technical Information Report for
       Pease AFB, NH. November  1990.  Draft.

 G-551 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1991.  Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3,
       IRP Site 5 and IRP Site 8 Column Leach Study Letter Reports. February 1991.

 G-553 WESTON  (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1991. Installation Restoration Program Stage 3B,
      Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection.  Pease AFB, NH. Draft Report.  February
       1991.

 G-563 WESTON  (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1991.  Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
       Sampling and Analysis Plan for Pease AFB, NH.  January 1991. Draft Final.

 G-568 WESTON  (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1991.  Protocols for Generation of Baseline Risk
      Assessments for the Pease AFB Sites. Roy F. Weston, Inc., West Chester, PA. July
       1991.

 G-573 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB
      Railroad Tracks (Site 46) Site Investigation Letter Report, Pease AFB, NH.  September
       1992.

 G-574 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C,
      Feasibility Study, JLandfill 5, Pease AFB, NH.

 G-580 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C,
      Landfill 5 Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH. April 1992.  Draft Final.

G-587 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, No
      Further Action Decision Document for IRP Site 3. Pease AFB, NH. September 1992.

G-590 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1992. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Site
      Characterization Summary, Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.ref               R-2                                 07/18/95

-------
 G-601 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1992. Protocols for Generation of Baseline Risk
       Assessments for Pease AFB, NH.  February 1992.

 G-614 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
       Basewide ARARs, Pease AFB, NH.  January 1993.

 G-617 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
       Landfill 5 Record of Decision Report, Pease AFB, NH. June 1993.

 G-622 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4,
       Zone 1 Draft Final Feasibility Study  Report, Pease AFB, NH.  December 1993.

 G-623 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.) 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Zone
       1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH.  October 1993.

 G-653 Feenstra, S., D.M. MacKay,  and J.A. Cherry.  1991.  A Method for Assessing
       Residual  NAPL Based on Organic  Chemical Concentrations  in  Soil Samples.
       Ground Water Monitoring Review,  Spring 1991:128-136.

 G-669 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1994. Installation Restoration Program, Site 13,
       Bulk Fuel Storage Area, Site Investigation Report, Pease AFB, NH. February 1994.

 G-696 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc,).  1994.  Installation Restoration Program, Technical
       Memorandum - Addendum to the Ecological Risk Assessment for LF-4 and the PCD A.
       Pease AFB, NH. August 1994.

 G-697 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.).  1994.  Installation Restoration Program, Proposed
       Plan for Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH.  July 1994.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.ref               R-3                                 07/18/95

-------
                             LIST OF ACRONYMS
AFB
AFCEE/ESB
AHCs
ARARs
BAFs
BFSA
CERCLA
CTVs
DEQPPM
DOD
DOI
EPA
FEMA
FFA
ftBGS
FWCA
GMZ
GT
HHCs
HQAFBCA
IRM
IRP
ITPO
ITR
LF-2
LF-3
LF-4
LF-5
MCLs
MOU
NCP
NFADD
NHANG
NHDES
NPL
O&M    .
OHCs
OUs
PA/SI
PA/SI
PAHs
PCB
PCDA
PCE
 Pease Air Force Base
 Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Base Closure Division
 aromatic hydrocarbons
 applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
 bioaccumulation factors
 Bulk Fuel Storage Area
 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
 critical toxicity values
 Defense Environmental Quality Program Policy Memorandum
 Department of Defense
 Department of the Interior
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 Federal Emergency Management Agency
 Federal Facilities Agreement
 feet below ground surface
 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
 Groundwater Management Zone
 Glacial Till
 halogenated hydrocarbons
 Headquarters Air Force Base Conversion Agency
 Interim Remedial Measure
 Installation Restoration Program
 intensive test pit operation
 Interim Technical Report
 Landfill 2
 Landfills
 Landfill 4
 Landfills
 Maximum Contaminant Levels
 Memorandum of Understanding
 National Contingency Plan
 No Further Action Decision Document
 New Hampshire Air National Guard
 New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
National Priorities List
 operation and maintenance
Oxygenated hydrocarbons
 operable units
Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation
Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
polychlorinated biphenyl
Paint Can Disposal Area
tetrachloroethene
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.aCT
                      Acr-1
07/14/95

-------
                             LIST OF ACRONYMS
                                 (Continued)


 PDA         Pease Development Authority
 PEA         3 letter site code
 Pease AFB    Pease Air Force Base
 QAPP        Quality Assurance Project Plan
 RAOs        remedial action objectives
 RCRA        Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
 RfD          reference dose
 RI/FS        Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
 RI     '      Remedial Investigation
 RME         reasonable maximally exposed
 ROD         Record of Decision
 ROs          remedial objectives
 SARA        Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
 SDWA        Safe Drinking Water Act
 SVOCs        semivolatile organic compounds
 TBC          to be considered
 TCE          Trichloroethene
 TCLP         Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
 TMV         toxicity, mobility, or volume
 TPHs         Total petroleum hydrocarbons
 TRC          Technical Review Committee
 USAFOEHL   U.S. Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory
 UST          Underground Storage Tank
 VOC         volatile organic compound
 WESTON*    Roy F. Weston, Inc.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zon«lrod.acr
Acr-2
07/14/95

-------
                                    APPENDIX A




                                      TABLES
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.sa                                                        07/14/95

-------
                                                        Table 1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Stage 1 Activities
Date
11/84
11/84-2/85
2/85-3/85
3/85
3/85-4/85
4/85-5/85
5/85
8/85-9/85
8/85-9/85
Activity
Surface water sampling
Monitor well installation and
development
Slug test
Surface water sampling
Groundwater sampling (round 1)
Groundwater sampling (round 2)
Surveying
Surface water resampling
Groundwater resampling
Sampling Points
SW-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
501 through 509
501, 502, 503, 504, 506, 507,
509
SW-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
501 through 509
501 through 509
501 through 509
SW-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
505
Purpose
Evaluate surface water for TOX, TOC, O&G (1-9)
cyanide, phenols, metals, and lindane (2-9).
Establish groundwater monitoring points around
LF-2, LF-4, LF-5, and the BFSA.
Evaluate hydraulic conductivity.
Evaluate surface water for TOX, TOC,
O&G (1-9), cyanide, phenols, metals, and lindane
(2-4, 6-9 only).
Evaluate groundwater for TOX, TOC, O&G, cyanide
(501 through 509), phenols, metals, and lindane (505
through 509 only).
Same as round 1.
Determine elevations and locations.
Re-evaluate surface water for cyanide, O&G, and
lindane because holding times were exceeded.
Re-evaluate groundwater for phenols, cyanide, and
lindane because holding times were exceeded.
MKO!\Rri':00628026.004\7.onc 1 rod apa
A-l
                                                         07/14/95

-------
                                                        Table 1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                     (Continued)
Staff 2 ActMOet
Date
10/87-1/88
10/87-1/88
10/87-1/88
Begin 11/87
12/87
3/88-4/88
3/88-4/88
4/88
4/88
Activity
Aerial photograph review
Magnetometer survey
GPR survey
Water-level measurements
(quarterly)
Rcsurvey
Test pit excavation
Piezometer installation
Soil borings
Piezometer installation
Scope
Photographs from 1952, 1960,
and 1976
25- x 50-ft grids
10- x 10-ft subgrids
(Landffll-2, -3, -4, -5)
10- x 10-ft subgrids
(Landfills -2, -4, -5)
Stage 1 wells, Stage 2 wells,
piezometers, gages as installed
Monitor wells 501 through 509
02-905 through 908
03-909, 910
04-911 through 914
05-915 through 929
02-905
03-910
04-911, 914
05-916, 919, 920, 924, 929n,
929s
03-700, 768, 769
03 700, 769
Purpose
Evaluate areal extent of and surface topography of
Zone 1 sites.
Evaluate areas of buried ferrous material (i.e.,
drums).
Verify anomalous magnetometer readings.
Evaluate hydrologic characteristics.
Verify locations and elevations.
Investigate magnetic and GPR anomalies; determine
depth and character of fill.
Obtain water-level measurements.
Characterize soil contamination.
Obtain water-level measurements.
MK01\RFT:00628026 004\zone Irod apa
A-2
                                                        07/14/95

-------
                                                        Table 1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                     (Continued)
Stage 2 Activities (Continued) ;
Date .
4/88
4/88-5/88
9/88-10/88
10/88
10/88
11/88-12/88
11/88
11/88
11/88-12/88
Activity
Staff gage installation
Survey
Water table and bedrock well
installation and development
Test pit excavation
Piezometer installation
Survey
Surface water and sediment
sampling
Minirate pumping test
Round 1 groundwater sampling
Scope
26-818 through 824
23-813
Test pits, borings, gages, and
piezometers
02-537
03-538
05-604, 605, 606
02-968, 969, 970
04-971, 972, 973, 980, 981
05-974, 975, 976
04-972, 981
Monitor wells and test pits
23-813
26-818 through 824
05-604
02-506, 507
03-538
04-508, 509
05-505, 604, 605, 606
13-501, 502, 503, 504
Purpose
Obtain water-level measurements; establish surface
water and sediment sampling locations.
Determine elevations and locations.
Evaluate overburden and bedrock water quality.
Evaluate refuse type and saturated thickness.
Obtain water-level measurements.
Determine elevations and locations.
Evaluate surface water for VOCs, SVOCs,
pesticides/PCBs, herbicides, total metals, and
cyanide. Evaluate sediment for VOCs, SVOCs,
pesticides/PCBs, metals, herbicides, and TPHs.
Estimate hydraulic conductivity.
Evaluate groundwater for VOCs, SVOCs,
peslicidcs/PCBs, herbicides, dissolved metals,
common anions, total hardness, and nitrate/nitrite.
MK01\RFT:0062R02fi.004\7.one1md.apa
A-3
                                                        07/14/95

-------
                                                        Table 1
                                     Summaiy of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                 Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                      (Continued)
Stitt 1 AttMtltt (CMOtuttt)
Date
5/89
5/89

9/89
10/89
10/89
10/89-1/90
11/89-12/89
11/89-4/90
1/90
2/90
Activity
Surface water and sediment
sampling
Round 2 groundwater sampling

Sediment and surface water
sampling
Stratigraphic boring
Water table well installation
Drum removal IRM
Bedrock well installation
Column leaching test
Chemical analysis hand auger
boring
Miniratc pumping tests
Scope
23-813
26-818 through 824
02-506, 507, 537
03-538
04-508,509
05-505,604
13-501, 502, 503, 504
St*g« 3 Activate
10 locations (818 through 824,
826 through 828)
05-7000
05-567, 05-568
1-acre tract; southeastern
section of landfill.
05-625 through 05-630
405, 406, 407, 408
05-7011
05-625, 05-627 through 05-630
Purpose
Evaluate surface water for VOCs, pesticides/PCBs,
total metals, BOD, and ammonia/nitrogen. Evaluate
sediment for cyanide.
Evaluate groundwater for VOCs, SVOCs,
pesticides/PCBs, herbicides, dissolved metals,
common anions, total hardness, nitrate/nitrite.

Evaluate surface water quality and measure its
potential effect on macroinvertebrate populations.
Optimize monitor well location and screen depth.
Evaluate overburden groundwater quality.
IRM performed to remove possible contaminant
source.
Evaluate bedrock groundwater quality.
Evaluate effect of soil contamination on groundwater
quality.
Obtain laboratory analysis during drum removal.
Evaluate aquifer characteristics.
MKOI\RIT:006281)26.004\zonelrod.apa
A-4
                                                         07/14/95

-------
                                                        Table 1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                      (Continued)
Stage 3 Activate* Continued)
Date
3/90, 10/90, 6/91,
8/91, 10/91
9/90
5/91
5/91
5/91
5/91-6/91
5/91-6/91
5/91-6/91
5/91-7/91
5/91-7/91
Activity
Groundwater sampling
Water table well installation
Test pit excavation
Landfill cover soil sampling
Stratigraphic borings
Piezometer installation
Borehole permeability borings
Borehole permeability tests
Bedrock well installation
Water table well installation
Scope
See groundwater analyte
summary table (Appendix B).
05-578
44-9001 through 44-9010
32 locations (336 through 367)
200- x 200-ft grid
03-7054, 05-7055, 05-7056, 05-
7079, 13-7053, 44-7049 through
44-7052
03-7054, 05-7040 through 05-
7046, 13-7053, 44-7049 through
44-7052
05-7039 through 05-7048
05-7039 through 05-7048
05-6003 through 05-6006
05-5007, 13-5008, 44-5015
Purpose
Characterize bedrock and overburden groundwater
quality in the LP-5 area.
Evaluate overburden groundwater quality west of LF-
5. Paired with bedrock well 629 to calculate vertical
hydraulic gradient.
Investigate potential PCE source upgradient of LP-5.
Characterize landfill cover material to assess air,
direct contact, and surface runoff pathways.
Optimize locations and screen intervals for
overburden monitor wells.
Monitor water levels in overburden.
Installed to conduct borehole permeability tests
within LF-5.
Further delineate landfill solid waste and establish
permeability values in the underlying material.
Evaluate bedrock water quality in/near LF-5.
Evaluate extent of PCE in groundwater.
MKUl\RIT:0062«02fi.n(M\zonelrod.apa
                                                           A-.S
07/14/95

-------
                                                        Table 1
                                     Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                      (Continued)
Stop J AttMOu (CteM*»««Q
Date
5/91-7/91
5/91-7/91
5/91-7/91
6/91
6/91,
10/91
7/91
9/91
9/91
10/91
11/91
Activity
Water table well installation
Water table well installation
Bedrock well installation
Sediment and surface water
sampling
Wetlands delineation
Pumping lest
Test pit excavation and soil
sampling
TCLP analyses
Sediment and surface water
sampling
Surface soil sampling
Smpe
05-5009 through 05-5011, 05-
5014
05-5012, 05-5013
44-6001,44-6002
17 locations (818 through 824,
827, 828, 8031 through 8038)
In and adjacent to LF-5
48-hour lest on well 05-630
05-9012 through 05-9021
Railway Ditch sediments,
test pits
Five locations (8061, 8072
through 8074, 8079)
46-372 through 46-377
Purpose
Monitor overburden water quality. Paired with
bedrock wells to calculate vertical hydraulic gradient.
Monitor water quality hydraulically downgradient of
the northern trench area.
Evaluate bedrock water quality upgradient of LF-5.
Delineate potential PCE source.
Evaluate surface water quality and measure potential
impacts to macroinvertebrate populations from
surface water/sediment contamination.
Identify wetlands areas.
Estimate hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock
aquifer beneath the landfill.
Characterize LF-5 soil and debris.
Evaluate teachability of soil and sediments.
Further characterize known contamination.
Evaluate herbicide usage along railroad tracks.
MK01\RFT:00628026.0M\zonelrod.»pa
A-6
                                                         07/14/95

-------
                                                        Table 1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                      (Continued)
Stage 4 Activities
Date
8/91
9/91 to 11/91
9/91 to 10/91
11/91
5/92
5/92
5/92
6/92
6/92-8/92
8/92
Activity
Surface soil samples
Stratigraphic, characterization, and
exploratory borings
Piezometer installation
Water table/bedrock well
installation
Stratigraphic borings
Piezometer installation
Bedrock well installation
Water table well installation
Intensive test pit operation (ITPO)
Test pits
Scope
02-3009 through 3011
04-3012 through 3017
13-7280 through 7299; 7350
through 7369; 7453
13-7280, 7284d, 7284s, 7285,
7287, 7291, 7294, 7299, 7353,
7354, 7355, 7358, 7359, 7360,
7361, 7363, 7369
13-5045, 5047, 6036, 6037
04-7461, 7467, 7464, 7465
04-7462, 7466
04-6052
13-5069
44-9029 through 9049
02-9072 through 9084
04-9063 through 971
Purpose
Characterize landfill cover material to assess air,
direct contact, and surface runoff pathways.
Characterize soil quality and determine lithology.
Characterize overburden groundwater flow direction.
Evaluate groundwater quality and flow direction
adjacent to the BFSA.
Characterize lithology and optimize monitor
well/piezometer placement.
Evaluate overburden groundwater quality
downgradient of LF-4.
Evaluate bedrock groundwater quality downgradient
of LF-4.
Evaluate overburden groundwater quality
downgradient of the BFSA.
Characterize the PCDA soil and debris. Remove
drums and contaminated soil.
Characterize soil and debris in LF-2 and
LF-4.
MK01\RTT:00628026.004\zone Irud.apa
A-7
                                                         07/14/95

-------
                                                       Table 1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                               Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                     (Continued)
St*gt4ActM&i(Conti*u*)
Dale
8/92
8/92
8/92
8/92-9/92
8/92-9/92
9/92
10/92-11/92
10/92-11/92
10/92-11/92
Activity
Surface water samples
Sediment samples
Water table well installation
Stratigraphic borings
Piezometer installation
Surface soil sampling
Bedrock well installation
Stratigraphic borings
Piezometer installation
Scope
26-8106, 8110, 8111, 8114
13-8157
23-8118, 8120 through 8125
26-818A, 819A, 821A, 8106
through 8117, 8119
13-8157
13-5097
13-7514, 7515, 7517, 7518,
7519, 7540, 7546, 7549, 7550,
7558, 7560, 7562
44-7572
13-7517, 7546
44-3044 through 3049
44-6087, 6088, 6089, 6091
44-7627, 7644, 7646, 7647,
7652, 7657, 7666, 7675, 7681,
7700, 7710, 7718, 7721, 5098
44-7644, 7646, 7647, 7652,
7657, 7675, 7710, 7718, 7721
Purpose
Evaluate surface water quality and further delineate
known contamination.
Evaluate sediment quality and further delineate
known contamination.
Evaluate overburden groundwater quality.
Characterize lithology and optimize monitor well
placement.
Characterize overburden groundwater flow.
Characterize surface soil to assess air, direct contact,
and surface water pathway. ,
Evaluate groundwater quality in fractured and
competent bedrock. Characterize bedrock flow
direction.
Characterize lithology.
Characterize overburden groundwater flow direction
and groundwaler quality.
MK01\RFT:00628026004\zone1rodapa
A-8
                                                        JD7/U/9S

-------
                                                        Table  1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                      (Continued)
Stage 4 Activities (Continued)
Date
11/92-12/92
11/92,12/92
11/92-12/92
11/92-12/92
12/92
12/92
1/93
1/93
1/93
Activity
Bedrock well installation
Water table well installation
Stratigraphic borings
Piezometer installation
Surface water/sediment samples
Groundwater sampling
Groundwater sampling
HydroPunch* -borings
Straligraphic borings
Scope
02-6094, 6100
04-6102
05-6101
13-6090, 6092, 6093, 6095,
60%, 6104, 6105
05-5113
02-7755, 7774, 7775, 7783, 7787
04-7788, 7789, 7791
13-7723, 7734, 7758, 7759,
7763, 7764, 7793, 7794
02-7755, 7775, 7783
04-7789, 7791
13-7723, 7759, 7793, 7794
8177, 8178, 8179
See Subsection 2.4.7.2
See Subsection 2.4.7.2
44-7833 through 7836, 7838
through 7840, 7842 through
7845
44-7832, 7841
Purpose
Evaluate bedrock groundwater quality.
Evaluate overburden groundwater quality.
Characterize lithology and optimize monitor well
placement.
Characterize lithology and monitor water levels in
overburden.
Evaluate surface water /sediment quality and further
delineate known contamination.
Assess potential groundwater contamination.
Assess potential groundwater contamination.
Evaluate groundwater quality.
Characterize lilhulogy.
MKOI\KrT:0062802r>.004\zonclrnd.apa
A-9
                                                         07/14/95

-------
                                                       Table 1
                                    Summary of Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Activities
                                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                     (Continued)

Date
1/93
1/93
1/93-2/93
6/93
6/93

Activity
Piezometer installation
Pumping test
Slug tests
Test pits
Groundwater sampling
St*g*4Aat#to(C*«iiuH4
Scope
13-7837
48-hour test on well 13-6104
02-6100, 6094, 7775, 7783
04-6102
05-5113, 6101
13-5069, 6090, 6092, 6096,
6104, 6105, 7723
44-6091, 7644, 7646, 7647,
7652, 7657, 7675, 7710
13-9174 through 9193; 9203
through 9205
See Subsection 2.4.7.2 of the
Zone 1 RI Report

Purpose
Replace 13-7280, which was inadvertently destroyed
and subsequently abandoned.
Evaluate aquifer characteristics within Zone 1.
Evaluate overburden and bedrock aquifer
characteristics.
Evaluate the extent of contamination.
Assess potential groundwater contamination
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonc1rod.afu
A-10
07/14/95

-------
                                         Table 2
                             Summary of Highest Organics
                             Concentrations in Soils — LF-2
                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Compound
Volatile Organics
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Xylene (total)
Maximum
Concentration
Detected
(mg/kg)
Sample ID

0.011 J
3009-S001
Sampling Interval
(ft BGS)

0-1.0
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Diethyl ether
0.003 J
9080-S002
9079-S003
2.0
3.0
Semi volatile Organics
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Acenaphylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(lr23-cd)pyrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
0.98 J
L3J
4.0
8.8
9.4
7.4
6.9
7,8
9.9
Z9J
1.9 J
22
4.0
5.8
1.7 J
1.5 J
26.0
22.0
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-S001
3009-SOOl
3009-S001
3009-SOOl
3009-SOOl
3009-SOOl
3009-SOOl
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
-0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
MK01\RFT:0062Sa26.004Vzcnclrod.4»i
                                         A-ll
                                                                                  07'U/95

-------
                                           Table 2

                                Summary of Highest Organics
                               Concentrations in Soils — LF-2
                                   Zone 1, Pease AFB,  NH
                                         (Continued)
Compound
PCBs
Arochlor-1248
Arochlor-1254
Other
Benzole acid
Maximum
Concentration
Detected
(mg/kg)

11.0
18.0
Sample ID

9079-S003
9079-S003
Sampling Interval
(ft BGS)

3.0
3.0

0.42 J
3009-S001
0-1.0
J = Estimated concentration compound detected below laboratory quantification limits.

Shading *  Location where maximum detected concentration exceeded the background value.
MK01\lUT:OQ62«B6.aM\melrad.*«
A-12
                                                                                      07/U/M

-------
                                           Table 3

                        Summary of Highest Metals Concentrations
                                      in Soils  - LF-2
                                   Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Element
Aluminum
Arsenic
Boron
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Silicon
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Concentration
Detected
(mg/kg)
12^00
10.2
26.1 J
50.4
.0.79
1,580
175
15.7
25.8
22,800
44.6
3,630
512
41.1
1580
23.6
60.2
Sample ID
9079-S003
3009-S001
9079-S003
9079-S003
3009-S001
3009-S001
9079-S003
3009-S001
9079-S003
9079-S003
3010-S002
9079-S003
3009-S001
9079-S003
3009-S001
3009-S001
9079-S003
Sampling Interval
(ft BGS)
3.0
0-1.0
3.0
3.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
3.0
0-1.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
0-1.0
3.0
0-1.0
0-1.0
• 3.0
J = Estimated concentration compound detected below laboratory quantification limits
MK01\RPT:0062S026.00*\l«ttlrod.«pi
A-13
                                                                                     mi 14/95

-------
              Table 4
Sununaiy of Highest Concentrations of
      Organics in Soils — LF-4
       Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Compound
Volatile Organics
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
1,4-Dicolorobenzenc
Toluene
Oilorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Xykne (total)
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Diethyl ether
Maximum
Concentration
Detected
(ngAg)

0.035
0.85
0.002 J
0.018
0.043

0.003 J
Sample ID

9069-S003
9069-S003
9069-S003
9069-S003
9069-S003
Sampling Interval
(ft BGS)

3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0

9069-S003
3.0
SemivoiatUe Organics
PAHs
>\r»n*nhtkf>n*
Anthracene
Benzo(a)aBthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(glh>i)peryleae
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
»
Dibenzo(a4>)anthraceae
Dibenzofuran
Fluorene
Fluoranthene
Indeno(L13-c,d)pyrene

2-Methybaphthaleae
Naphthalene
0.43 J
0.41
2.6
25
2.4
L8
2.4
17
0^1
OJT7J
0.49
6.0
1.7
030 J
0.57 J
9067-S002
9068-S012
9067-S002
9067-S002
9067-S002
9067-S002
9067-S002
9067-S002
9067-S002
9068-S012
9068-S012
9067-S002
9067-S002
9069-S003
9069-S003
2.0
9.0-13.0
2.0
2.0
10
10
10
10
10
9.0-D.O
9.0-13.0
10
10
3.0
3.0
               A-14
07/14/93

-------
                                        Table 4
                         Summary of Highest Concentrations of
                               Organics in Soils — LF-4
                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                     (Continued)
Compound
Semivolatile Organics (continued)
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Maximum
Concentration
Detected
(mg/kg)
Sample ID
Sampling Interval
(ft BGS)

4.1
4:9 J
9067-S002
9067-S002
2.0
2.0
Phthalates
Bis(2-ethyihexyl) phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Diethylphthalate
8.9
0.055 J
0.054 J
9069-S003
3016-S002
9068-S012
3.0
0-10
9.0-13.0
Phenols
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
0.091J
0.16 J
0.14 J
9069-S003
3014-S002
3014-S002
3.0
0-2.0
0-2.0
Nitrogenated SemivolatUes
n-Nhrosodiphenylamine
0.074 J
9068-S012
9.0-13.0
Pesticides
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
gamma-BHC (lindane)
0.0025 J
0.0014 J
0.0041 J
0.00036 J
PCBs „
Aroclor-1232
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
23
3.1 J
031 J
3017-S002
3013-S002
3016-S002
3013-S002
0-2.0
0-20
0-2.0
0-2.0

9069-S003
9068-S012
9069-S003
3.0
9.0-13.0
3.0
MK01UtFT:0062SQ26.0a*\xanclroii.q>i
A-15
                                                                                07/14(95

-------
                                           Table 4

                           Summary of Highest Concentrations of
                                 Organics in Soils — LF-4
                                   Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                        (Continued)
Compound
Other
Benzoic acid
Total petroleum hydrocarbons
(E418.1)
TPH (SW8100)
Maximum
Concentration
Detected
(mg/kg)

037 J
11400
342
Sample ID

3014-S002
911-S001
9069-S003
Sampling Interval
(ft BGS)

0-10
0-1.0
3.0
 J » Estimated concentration compound detected below laboratory quantification limits.
 Shading • Location where maximum detected concentration exceeded the background value.
MK01\KPT:OM210tt.OMMaMlnd.4M
A-16
                                                                                      07/14/95

-------
                                            Table 5
                                 Summary of Highest Metals
                               Concentrations in Soils — LF-4
                                   Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Element
Aluminum
Arsenic
Boron
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Silicon
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Concentration
Detected
(mgAg)
14,200
15.0 J
40.4 J
983
0.75
3,2201
52
25.6 J
35.4
35.8
31,900
138
5,730
L090J
23
83.0 J
U20
2,770
109
27.2
191
Sample ID
3012-S002
9068-S112
9067-S002
9068-S112
9067-S002
9068-S112
911-S001
9068-S112
911-S001
9068-S112
9067-S002
911-S001
9066-S001
9068-S112
911-S001
9068-S112
3013-S002
3014-S002
9069-S003
9067-S002
9069-S003
Sampling Interval
(ft BGS)
0-2.0
9.0-13.0
2.0
9.0-13.0
2.0
9.0-13.0
0.1.0
9.0-D.O
0-1.0
9.0-13.0
2.0
0-1.0
1.0
9.0-13.0
0-1.0
9.0-13.0
-0-2.0
0-2.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
J = Estimated concentration compound detected below laboratory quantification limits.
Shading = Location where maximum detected concentration exceeded the background
value.
MK01\RPT:00«2S026.0M\ZDaelrod.>pa
                                            A-17
                                                                                       07/14/95

-------
                                   Table 6

  Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organics in Water Table Groundwater
                           Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Maximum Detected
Concentration
Organics Compounds (u.f/D Location ID
Volatile Omaies \
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzene
sec-Butyibenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
i CUorobenzene
1,2- Dkhlorobenzene
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
Isopropylbenzene
4-Isopropyitoluene
N-Propylbenzene
MJ»-Xvtene
Methyfene chloride
Toluene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
13,5 -Trimetbvlbenzene
9.0 5014-M001
4.0
0.9 J
22.0
2.0
5008-M002
5008-M002
502-M007
567-M004
32.0 567-M004I
1.0 i 5014-M001
020 J
5008-M101
5014-MOOl
7844-M001
1.0 5014-MOOl!
03 J
5008-M002
54.0 J • ! 7835-M003
0.8 J
0.20 J
0.10 J
0.10
7845-MOO]
567-M004
502-M007
502-M008
Halogenated Hydrocarbons
CbJoroetbane 3.0 502-MOO?!
as- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Dicblorodifluorometaane
U-Dichloroethane
1.2-DicUoroetbane
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Total- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl chloride
Methytethylketone (2-batanone)
Tetrachloroethene 0*CE)
Trichioroethene (TCE)
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinvl chloride
9.0 502-M007
20.0 J ; 502-M001
12 i 502-M005
050 J 502-M007
0.10 J
6.90 J
3.0
13.0
56.0
46.0
502-M007
502-M102
5007-M101
7675-M002
502-M005
502-M005
020 J 6087-M001
8.10 502-M005
Oxycenated Hydrocarbons '
piethyl ether 40.0 502-M102
Seouvolttilc Orooacs
PAHs !
Fluoranthene
Pvrene
Naphthalene
Phthatetes
Benzyl- butyl phthalate
Bisft-ethyihexyl) phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Di-n- butyl phthalate
1.0 J i 578-MOOli
3.0 J 7644-M002
2.0 J 502-M007

25.0
1.100
2.0 J
7644-M002
7644-M002
567-M002
502-M003
2.0 J 578-M001
MK01\RPT«»2a026.00*zlro<»6.wk3
A-18
18-Jul-95

-------
                                       Table 6

  Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organics in Water Table Groundwater
                              Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                     (Continued)
Organics Compounds
Maximum Detected
Concentration
filE/L")
Location ID
Semivolatile Oreanics (continued) !
Diethvlphthalate j 1.0 J
5012-M001
Phenols
4-Chloro-3-methvlphenol I 10 J
5014-M001 '
! Pestitides/PCBs \
Alpha BHC
Aroclor-1260
4-4'-DDD
Heptachlor
0.06
1.80
0.03 J
0.04 J
r 5008-M101
7646-M002
567-M004
502-M005
Herbicides
2.4.5-TP CSilvex) 1 0.05 J
5008-M001
          'Exceeds proposed primary MCL.

          J = Estimated concentration. Compound detected below laboratory quantification limits.
          Shading = Location where the maximum detected concentration exceeds the MCL value.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zlrod6.wk3
                                        A-19
                                                                             18-Jul-95

-------
                                      Table 7

                  Summary of Highest Concentrations of Metals
                      Detected in Water Table Groundwater
                             Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
ij
Anffhte
Aluminum, Soluble
A iiifHitmtii t tOtll
Arsenic, soluble
Arsenic, total
Barium, soluble
Barium, total
Beryllium, total
Boron, soluble
Boron, total
Padmnim total
Calcium, soluble
Calcium, total

Cobalt, soluble
Cobalt, total
Copper, soluble
Copper, total
Iron, soluble
Iron, total
Lead, soluble
Lead, total
Magnesium, soluble
Magnesium, total
Manganese, soluble
Mancanete, total
Mercury, soluble
MoModenum, total
Nickel soluble
Nickel total
Maximum Detected
Concentration i Location ID
fu/L1 ! (u/L) I
0.439*
82 3J*
0.194*
0353*
0.0599
0.638
0.0057*
0.15*
0.405
0.0053
167.0
149.0
0.462 .F*
0.0796
0226
0.0158
0.188*
553*
232.0*
0.007
0.165"*
508-MOO]
5007-M101
567-M004
567-M004J
5014-M001
7647-M002
7647-M002
5008-M003
7647-M002
7646-M002I
567-M003I
7652-M002
5007-M1011
5014-M001
7647-M002
568-M001
7647-M002
5014-M001
7647-M002
567-M002
7647-M002
463* 567-M003
685 J*
5007-M101
13.9* 7675-M002
13.2* 7675-M002
0.0002 508-M001
0.136 7675-M102
0.046*
0.457**
5014-M001
7657-M002
Potassium, soluble 13.1* 567-M002
Potassium, total
Silicon, soluble
Silicon, total
Sodium, soluble
Sodium, total
Thallium, soluble
Vanadium, total
Zinc, soluble
Tjinf , tntstl
20.4* 7647-M002
21.7* i 567-M004
95.7 J* 5007-M101
54.0 J* 506-M003
52.0* 506-M004
0589 J 567-M002
0.212*
0.144 J
0.403*
7647-M002!
509-M002!
5007-M101
      'Above background (G-563).
      "Exceeds proposed primary MCL.

      J m Estimated concentration. Compound detected below laboratory quantiScation limits.
      Shading * Location where the maximum detected concentration exceeded the MCL/SMCL
      value.
MK01\RPTfl062a026.00*zlrod7.wk3
                                       A-20
18-Jul-95

-------
                                 Table 8

        Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds in
                        Deep Bedrock Groundwater
                          Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Organic Compound
Volatile Organic Compounds
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
14 - Dichlorobenzene
1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
14,4 - Trimethylbenzene
14 - Xylene
13,5 - Trimethylbenzene
13 - Dichlorobenzene
4— Isopropvl toluene
Benzene
i Chlorobenzene
! Ethvlbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
,M,P- Xylene
N-Butylbenzene
N-Propylbenzene
P - Dichlorobenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
! tert-Butylbenzene
Toluene
Xylenes (total)
Haloeenated Hydrocarbons
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethane
14 — Dichoroe thane
Chloroform
cis - 1,2 - Dichloroethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Methyl chloride i
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Total- 14 - dichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride !
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
PAHs
! Naphthalene
Phenols
4— Chloro - 3 — methylphenol
Maximum Detected
Concentration
(jLg/L)


32 J
03 J
4.0 J
0.7 J
0.4 J
0.7 J
05 J
59.0
80.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
0.7 J
3.0
38.0
3.0
0.9 J
2.0
5.7 J

2.0 J
15.0
22 J
04 J
0.9 J
23.0
33 J
53 J
8.0
2.4 J
3.0
1.0 J


10.0

10.0
Location ID


605-MOOli
606-M004J
604-M005
6005-M001
6005-M002!;
630-M103
6005-M002
6105-M001
605-M004
6005- MOO 1
6005-M002
6005-M001
606-M004
6005-M002
604-M005
630-M003 1
630-M103'
604-M005 :
606-M004
606-M004I
6005-M001 1
6102-M001
604-M003 !

6094-M001
6005 -M001 I
605-M003jj
6100-MOOll
6005-MOOlli
6005-M002
604-MOOll
604-M0011
6006-M001
630-M001
6002- M002
6005-MOOli
1!
;
604-M005 ;

605-M101,,
MK01VRPTK»628026.0(M\zlrod8.wk3
                                   A-21
                                                                   18-Jul-95

-------
                                     Table 8

         Summary of Highest Concentrations of Organic Compounds in
                          Deep Bedrock Groundwater
                            Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                  (Continued)
Ornnjf C/ffiiDQU.nd
Maximum Detected
Concentration
Cue/Lt
Phthalates
Bts(2-ethvihexvl) phthalate
Di-n-butvl phthalate
Diethvtohthalate
Dimetbvtohthalate
8JOJ
6.0 J
11.0
8.0 J
Location ID

605-M101
604-M004
630-M003
628-M004
Pesticides
Alplut endosulf an
BetaBHC
DDT
DeluBHC
14.4-DDD
0.02 J
0.01J
0.02 J
0.04 J
0.1
605-M101
605-M001
605-M001
605-M101
605-M004 !
       J • Estimated concentration. Compound detected below laboratory quantification limits.
       Shading = Location when the maTimum detected concentration exceeded the MCL value.
MK01\RPT:006M026.00*zlrod8.wk3
A-22
                                                                         W-Jul-95

-------
                                       Table 9

                  Summary of Highest Concentrations of Metals
                        Detected in Bedrock Groundwater
                              Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Metal
Aluminum, soluble
Aluminum total
Arsenic, soluble
Arsenic, total
Barium, soluble
Barium, total
Boron, soluble
Boron, total
PadnMim, soluble
Cadmium, total
Calcium, soluble
Calcium, total
Chromium, total
Cobalt, soluble
Cobalt, total
Copper, total
Maximum Detected
Concentration
(mg/L}
0349
1.66
0.187 J*
0.195 J*
0.107 a
0.111
0336 a
0.269
0.0051 a
0.0056
150
108
0.0103
0.0602
0.0636
0.01
Iron, soluble 64.8
Iron, total
Lead, soluble
Lead, total
Magnesium, soluble
Magnesium, total
Manganese, soluble
Manganese, total
Mercury, soluble
j Mercury, total
Nickel soluble
Nickel total
Potassium, soluble
Potassium, total
Silicon, soluble
Sodium, soluble
Sodium, total
Thallium, soluble
Vandium, soluble
Vanadium, total
Zinc, soluble
Zinc, total
Location
Sample ID !
6088-M002 j
626-M104 ;
6005 -M001 1
6005 -M001
6005-M001 1
6005-M001 i;
605-M001 1
605-M004 •
627-M001
6100-M002
606-M003
605-M004
626-M004
606-M003
630-M103
6001 -M001 :
604-M005 '
130 626-M104
0.0087 * 625-M006 ;'
0.0308 *J
39.1 J3
630-M103 '••.
604-M004
342 ! 6006- M002 \
6.02 a
4.04
0.0007 J
0.00014
0.122 *»
0.0903
17.7*
15.4 a
24.9*
119 a
110 a
0.579 J
0.0488
0.0489
0.078 J
0.132 J
630-M001 i
630-M003 'I
630-M102 i
6003-M002 i
606-M003 !
605-M004 I
606-M002
606-M004 1
606-M001
6101-M002
6101-M002 !
606-M002 j
6005-M001 !
6005-M001
6094-M001
6004- M002
       *Above background (G-563).
       'Exceeds proposed primary MCL.

       J = Estimated concentration. Compound detected below laboratory quantification limits.
       Shading = Location where the maximum detected concentration exceeded the MCL/SMCL
       value.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zlrod9.wlc3
                                        A-23
18-Jul-93

-------
                                            Table 10
                   Chemicals of Concern in Site 2 Soil (0 to 2 feet deep)*
                                    Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organic*
Benzok acid
Dibenzofuran
2-MethvinaivhtnaleiK

N*ph»hsUn*
PAHs
A r«i *nhtllF1la*

Acenaphthyieae
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyreae
Benzo(b)fliiamithene
BenaXgJijfyperykae
Bfn7Qft^f\wrmnttt*nr
Chryseae
Dibffn7ftf a Manthrarfjiff

Fluorantheae
Fbioreae
Indeno(lr23-c,d)pyreae
»L__.__»U____
mcDanuirciK
Pyrene
Xylenes (total)
Frequency of
Detection6*

2/3
1/3
1/3
1/3

1/3
1/3
1/3
2/3
2/3
2/3
2/3
2/3
2/3
1/3
2/3
1/3
1/3
2/3
2/3
' 1/3
Range of
Sample
Ouantitation
Limits
(»«/kg)

1.8
036-0.43
036-0.43
036-0.43

036-0.43
036-0.43
036-0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
036-0.43
0.43
036-0.43
036-0.43
0.43
0.43
0.006
Range of
Detected
Concentrations"
(ng/kg)

0.063-0.42
1.9
1.7
1.5

0.98
13
4.0
0.041-8.8
0.052-9.4
0.046-7.4
0.041-65
0.038-73
0.049-9.9
2.9
0.059-22
4.0
5.8
0.038-26
0.069-22
0.0010
Mean
Concentration1"1
(mg/kg)

0.46'
0.77
0.70
0.63

0.46
0.57
1.5
3.0
32
2J6
2.4
2.7
3.4
1.1
7.4
1.5
2.1
83
7.4
0.0023*
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(ing/kg)

1.2*
2.4*
2.T
1.9*

1.2*
1.6*
5-21
ir
ir
9.6'
9.0*
101
13'
3.T
29*
5Jf
IS
34*
29*
0.0043*
The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for both the human health and ecological risk
There was only one sample for each sampling location. Therefore, the summary statistics were based on the
 detected fOTHTitf^tyft
'Number of «*™p<"«c locations at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of sampling
 locations.
"Arithmetic mean.
                     detected concentration.
                                            A-24
07/14/95

-------
                                          Table 11
                   Chemicals of Concern in Site 4 Soil (0 to 2 feet deep)'
                                  Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organic*
Benzole acid*
Bis(2-ethyihexyl) phthalate'
4,4'-DDD«
4,4'-DDE*
4,4'-DDT«
Dibenzofuran
Di-n-butyl phthalate'
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Naphthalene
4-Nitrophcnol
n-Nitrosodiphenyiamine
Frequency of
Detection"

8/8
1/9
2/9
1/9
2/9
2/8
2/9
1/9
2/9
1/9
1/8
Range of
Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(n>g/kg)

1.9
036-0.62
0.009-2.4
0.018-2.4
0.009-2.4
037-0.42
036-0.62
1.8-2.8
037-0.62
0.53-0.93
037-0.51
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations0
(mg/kg)
Mean
Concentration"
(mg/kg)

0.040-037
0.19
0.002-0.003
0.001
0.003-0.009
0.064-0.17
0.050-0.055
0.14
0.036-0.076
0.16
0.041
0.11
0.21'
0.089'
0.097*
0.085*
0.18'
0.19*
LO*
0.191
031'
0.191
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(mg/kg)

027
0.23'
?.r
6.51
SJff
0.26'
034'
2.01
0.351
038'
035*
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Anthracene*
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(gAi)perylfine
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenao(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(L23-c,d)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Pyrcne*
3/9
2/9
4/9
4/9
4/9
4/9
4/9
4/9
3/9
5/9
3/9
4/9
5/9
5/9
037-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
039-0.62
037-0.62
037-0.62
039-0.62
039-0.62
0.045-0.43
0.075-036
0.16(0.086)-2.6
0.16(0.081)-2^
0.18(0.086)-2.4
0.11(0.054)-!^
0.15(0.089)-2.4
0.19(0.095)-2.7
0.087-0.61
0.073-6.0
0.039-0.41
0.11(0.051)-1.7
0.040-4.1
0.040-2.1
022
0.23
0.49
0.45
0.45
039
0.43
0.51
026
0.97
021
038
0.68
0.44
0.40
032
1.5
12
1-2
0.97
1.1
1.5
0.41
93'
0.41
0.96
6.71
1.7
MK01VJUT:0062I026.004Vuaclrod.i|»
A-25
                                                                                     07/14/95

-------
                                            Table 11
                   Chemicals of Concern in Site 4 Soil (0 to 2 feet deep)'
                                    Zone 1, Pease AFB,  NH
                                          (Continued)
f htmiiral
Inorganics
CmAnt'nnn
Coffer
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
Frequency of
Detection"

1/9
9/9
9/9
4/9
9/9
9/9
Range of
Sample
Quantisation
Limits
(mg/kg)

1,8-3.1
3.0*
20>
0.054-0.12
5.0*
1.0*
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'
(mg/kg)

5.2
13-54
0.51-138
0.14-15
20-63
30-139
Mean
Concentration"
(mg/kg)

1.4
24
45
074
33
52
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(«ng/kg)

23
36
66?
2.0
45
75
The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for both the human health and ecological risk
"Number of sampling locations at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of sampling
 locations.
If the minimum or maximum detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum
 averaged concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
*The m<>y was <*«lmi«n>nt. "»'ng the minimum variance unbiased
 ftfimation approach for lognonnalry distributed data (G-262).
•Chemical was not detected above background.
'Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
'Selected as a ^lifff^y^i of concern for  *h**- ccoloaind risk assessment only.
'Sample  quantitation limits were not available. The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
                                             A-26
07/I4/W

-------
                                         Table 12
                  Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Soil (0 to 2 feet deep)*
                                  Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organic*
Benzole arid'
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate'
4,4'-DDDe
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dibenzofuran
Dieldrin*
Di-n-butyl phthalate'
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Frequency of
Detection"

1/8
1/8
1/8
4/8
6/8
1/8
1/8
1/8
1/8
V8
Range of
Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(mg/kg)

1.7-1.9
034-0.48
0.017-0.084
0.017-0.18
0.017-0.018
034-0.48
0.017-0.018
034-038
034-0.48
034-0.48
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations1
(mg/kg)
Mean
Concentration"1
(mg/kg)
Upper 95%
Confidence
I .'mil of the
Mean
Concentration
(mg/kg)

039
0.19(0.16-0.22)
0.042
0.006-0.042
0.025-0.081
0.23
0.004
0.095
0.080
0.10
0.84'
0.19
0.019
0.026
0.038
0.19
0.022'
0.17*
0.18'
0.18'
1.1'
0.201
0.038
0.083'
0.10'
021
Q.QW
020*
0.23'
0.22'
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene'
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene'
Benzo(a)pyrene'
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'
Benzo(g^,i)perylene*
Benzo(k)fluoranthenee
Chrysene*
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracenec
Fluoranthene*
Fluorene
Indeno(123-c,d)pyrene*
1/8
1/8
2/8
4/8
4/8
4/8
4/8
4/8
4/8
2/8
5/8
1/8
4/8
034-0.48
034-0.48
034-0.48
035-037
035-037
035-037
035-037
035-037
035-037
034-0.48
035-036
034-0.48
035-037
0.082
0.17
0.056-0.45
0.081-0.53
0.081-0.46
0.087-0.43
0.053-036
0.11-0.46
0.11-0.64
0.049-0.11
0.057-1.7
0.41
0.064-034
0.18'
O.I?
021
021
020
021
0.18
021
025
0.16'
0.40
021
0.17
0.23'
0.20"
036
037
033
035
034
033
0.44
0.26'
1.7
0.27
031
MK01\RPT:00628026.00«\2ooclro
-------
                                            Table 12
                   Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Soil (0 to 2 feet deep)'
                                    Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                           (Continued)
Chemical
Omnifx (ermtimted)

Phenanthrene
Pyrene'
Frequency of
Detection"

4/8
5/8
Range of
Sample
Qwtitatkm
T -jmjfo
(«8/kg)

035-037
035-036
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations1
(ng/kg)

0.073-1.7
0.053-0.98
Mean
Concentration**
(mg/kg)

032
030
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(mg/kg)

1.1
0.93
Inorganics
CibfOOUUfll
Lead
Manganese

Mercury
Nickel
'I'^raflllliH
Vanadium
8/8
8/8
8/8
2/3
8/8
1/1
8/8
4.0*
20*
UP
0.11
5.0*
20*
4.0"
19-41(45)
2.4(1.9)-178
205-1,480
0.070-031
17-59
673
13-87
26
61
604
0.14
31
673*
28
31
929"
1,048
537"
43
NA
49
The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for both the human health and ecological risk

"Number of sampling locations at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of sampling
 locations.
Tf ^K» minimum of m^yjuftimi detected concentration differed from the respective **"•*«""*" or maximum
 averaged concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
'Unless otherwise indicated, the mean was calculated "«*"g the minimmn variant unbiased estimation approach
 for lognormaUy distributed data (G-262).
'Chemical was not detected above background.
*Eirmh the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
•Selected as a chemical of concern for die ecological risk assessment only.
kSample quantitation Emits were not available. The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
'Arithmetic mean.  The maximum  variance unbiased estimation approach cannot be used to calculate a mean
 based on one data point

NA * Not applicable. An upper 15% confidence limit of the mean concentration cannot be calculated based
      on one A*** point.
MKOlUtrrOOtnOM.OMXnclradjp*
A-28
                                                                                          07/14/95

-------
                                         Table 13
                 Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Soil (0 to 15 feet deep)'
                                  Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Frequency of
Detection"
Range of
Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(mg/kg)
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations0
(mg/kg)
Organics
Benzole acid*
Bis(2-ethyihexyl) phthalate"
4,4'-DDDc
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dibenzofuran
Di-n-butyl phthalate'
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
5/16
3/16
1/16
5/16
6/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1.7-1.9
034-0.48
0.016-0.092
0.016-0.18
0.016-0.092
034-0.48
034-039
034-0.48
034-0.48
0.045-0.47(039)
0.051(0.048)-
0.19(022)
0.030(0.042)
0.004-0.042
0.025-0.063
(0.081)
0.23
0.095
0.080
0.10
Mean
Concentration11
(mg/kg)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(mg/kg)

0.83'
0.17
0.018
0.020
0.026
0.19
0.171
0.18'
0.18'
ISf
0.21'
0.026
0.033
0.043
0.19
0.19*
0.20"
0.191
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthyiene*
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracenee
Bcnzo(a)pyrenee
Benzo(b)fluoranthence
Benzo(gAi)perylenec
Benzo(E)fluoranthenec
Chrysene'
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracenee
Fluoranthene*
1/16
2/16
3/16
9/16
8/16
8/16
7/16
8/16
9/16
3/16
10/16
034-0.48
034-0.48
034-0.48
034-037
034-037
034-037
034-037
034-037
034-037
034-0.48
034-036
0.082
0.049-0.17
0.080(0.056)-
0.45
0.045-0.83
0.081(0.048)-
0.79
0.087(0.055)-
0.92
0.053(0.044)-
0.58
0.11(0.053)-0.62
0.055-0.83
0.11(0.049)-0.18
0.057(0.044)-1.7
0.18'
0.18'
0.19
020
021
021
0.19
020
022
0.17
032
0201
021'
022
031
. 0.28
029
026
0.26
033
0.19*
0.61
MK01\XFT:0062S026.00«\2nKlnd.i|»
A-29
                                                                                    07/14/95

-------
                                             Table 13

                  Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Soil (0 to 15 feet deep)*
                                    Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                           (Continued)
^hrtn?ra*
Organic* (continued)
Fluorene
Indeoo(l,23-c,d)pyrene<
Phenmthrene
Pyrene*
Frequency of
Detection"

1/16
7/16
7/16
10/16
Range of
Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(•ngAg)

034-0.48
034-037
034-037
034-036
Inorganics
Lead
MailgMMUM-
Mercury
Nkkel
Titanium
Vanadium
16/16
16/16
3/11
16/16
1/1
16/16
20«
Iff
0.051-0.12
Sff
Iff
iff
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'
(mg/kg)

0.41
0.064(0.038)-
OSJ
0.056-1.7
0.053(0.039)-1.6
Mean
Concentrationd
(l>g/kg)

0.20
0.19
024
027
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(»g/kg)

022
0.25
039
0.49

2.4(1.9)-
149(178)
205(204)- 1,480
0.060(0.070)-
031
18(17)-59
673
9.2-87
47
532
0.085
24
673*
18
186'
953
0.451
27
NA
46
The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
"Number of sampling locations at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of sampling
 locations.
If the minimum or maximum detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum
 averaged concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
"Unless otherwise indicated, the mean was calculated using the •"*«'"""" variance unbiased estimation approach
 for tognonnaUy distributed data (G-262).
'Chemical was not detected above background.
'Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
•Sample quantitarion limits ware not available. The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
"Arithmetic mean. The minimum  variance unbiased estimation approach cannot be used to calculate a mean
 based on one data point
 NA -  Not applicable. An upper 95% confidence limit of the mean concentration cannot be calculated based
       on one data point.
                                              A-30
07/14/M

-------
                                                 Table 14

                     Chemicals of Concern in Site 2 Groundwater — Water Table*
                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH





Chemical



Frequency
of
Detection"
Organics
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
1/2
1/2


Range of Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(«/L)

Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'
(/•S/L)



Mean
Concentration"
(W5/L)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(«g/L)

0.60-1.0
1.0-5.0
0-57(0.50-0.60)
037(0.10)
OJO
0.7T
0.92'
33'
Inorganics
Sodium (filtered)

2/3

4,220-8,180

6,827(7360)-
27,967(48300)
12301

35,516'

The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
"Number of wells at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of wells.
If the minimum or maximum detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum averaged
 concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
"Arithmetic mean based on the averaged concentrations.
'Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
'Sample quantitation limits were unavailable.  The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
     MK01\RFT:0062SC)26.0MV2a»elrod.ap»
A-31

-------
                                                 Table 15

                     Chemicals of Concern in Site 4 Groundwater - Water Table*
                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
fhymif«l
Organic*
Bis(2-ethylhoryl)
phthalate
L2-Dkhloroethane
Naphthalene
Frequency
of
Detection"

1/4
1/4
1/4
Range of Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(«/L)

10
0.20-1.0
1.0
Range of Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'
0«/L)

3.0(1.0)
0.30
0.45(0.40)
Mean
Concentration"
(«g/L)

4.5*
03ff
0.49t
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(wg/L)

5.T
0.48'
0.52'
Inorganics
Aluminum (filtered)
Iron (filtered)
Lead (filtered)
Mercury (filtered)
Silicon (filtered)
Sodium (filtered)
1/4
1/4
2/4
1/4
4/4
4/4
200
40
3.0
0.1-02
300f
8,250-10,800
185(439)
290(1,090)
4.0(6.0)-5.1(7.0)
0.1(02)
4,883(5,250)-6,560
5^20-14,600(15,600)
121
89
3.1
0.1
5,545
9,197
171
246
53*
0.1
6^98
13,847
only.
The listed «*»»mif«it were selected as <*i'>>mir«k of concern for the human health risk
"Number of wells at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of wells.
Tf the minimum or nujomum detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum averaged
 concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
"Arithmetic mean based on the averaged concentrations.
•Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
'Sample Quantitation i"»**« were not available. The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
                                                  A-32
          07/14/95

-------
                                                 Table 16

                    Chemicals of Concern in Site 4 Groundwater — Deep Bedrock"
                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Frequency of
Detection"*
Organic*
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
m,p-Xylenes (total)
o-Xylene
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
Range of
Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(«/L)

10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Range of
Detected
Concentrations"
(/«/L)
Mean
Concentration"4
(flg/L)
Upper 95%
Confidence
limit of the
Mean
Concentration
teA)

1.0
0.10
2.0
0.70
030
3.»
A-33
                                                                                              07/14/95

-------
                        Table 17
Chemicals of Concern in Site 5 Groundwater - Water Table*
                 Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organics
Benzene
Bis(2-ethyihexyl) phthalate
sec-Butylbenzene
CUorobenzene
Chloroethane
4-Chlaro-3-methylphenol
i ?.pv^>i"robfn7f nf

1,4-Dkhlorobenzene
DicUorodifiuoromethane
U-Dkhloroethane
ds-l^-Dichloroethene
Diethyl ether
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyi phthalate
Isoptopyibenxeiie
Naphthalene
Frequency
of
Detection"

3/11
3/11
3/11
4/11
1/11
2/11
2/11
3/11
2/11
2/11
3/11
1/3
2/11
1/11
1/11
2/11
2/11
Range of
Sample
Quantitation
I imift
(Mg/L)

0.70-1.0
10-12
1.0
110-12
2.0-3.0
10-11
050-2.0
050-1.0
2JO-9JO
0.40-1.0
1.0
2.0
10-12
10-12
10-12
1.0
1.0
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'

034(030)-9.0
1.0-31(160)
0.40(0.20)-2.0
050-12(22)
1.9(2.0-3.0)
25(2.0)-10
0.42(020)-0.8
3(2.0)
16(6.7)-28(32)
3.7(3.0)-6.1(20)
035(050)-
6.0(7.6)
0.20-73(9.0)
19(35-40)
3.8(2.0)-4.6(2.0)
1.0
3.8(2.0)
0.90-1.0
030-1.0(2.0)
Mean
Concentration"

13
7.0
0.66
3.0
12
5.4
0.49
6.6
2.4
0.93
12
7.1
5.1'
4.9*
5.1€
058
053
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration

2.7
11
0.91
55
13
63
056
13
33
1.9
23
25-
53'
5.6«
5.4'
0.68
0.62
PAHs
Fluoranthene
n-Propytbenzene
Tetrachloroethenc
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
1/11
2/11
3/11
2/11
1/11
10-12
1.0
020-1.0
0.60-1.0
020-2.0
33(1.0)
020-1.0
1.9(1.0)-22(56)
13(051)-27(46)
25(1.0-8.1)
5.1'
052
3.6
2.9
0.91
5.4'
0.62
75
72
12
                         A-34
07/14^3

-------
                                                 Table 17

                     Chemicals of Concern in Site 5 Groundwater  — Water Table*
                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                               (Continued)





Chemical



Frequency
of
Detection"
Inorganics
Arsenic (filtered)

Boron (filtered)
Cobalt (filtered)
Iron (filtered)
Lead (filtered)
Manganese (filtered)

Nickel (filtered)
Silicon (filtered)

Thallium (filtered)

5/11

2/11
1/11
8/11
2/11
10/11

4/11
11/11

3/11


Range of
Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(A«/L)

5.0-10

100
40-50
40-295
3.0-15
10-24

15-40
4,410-4,820

10-200


Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'
(/«/L)

5.0(6.0)-
153(194)
150-253
80
34(42)-55300
33(5.0-7.0)
10(14)-
3,875(4,970)
15(16)-46
3,926(4,000)-
21,700
43(120)-
215(589)



Mean
Concentration"
(^g/L)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(Kg/L)

22

78
26
7,764
1.9
1,130

16
10,116

40

47

ID
36
17,192
2.3
1,848

22
13,101

74

The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
"Number of wells at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of wells.
If the minimum or maximum detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum averaged
 concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
dArithmetic mean based on the averaged concentrations.
'Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
'Sample quantitation limits were not available.  The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
     MK01\RPT:00628O26.004\zooclrod.tp»
A-35
                                                                                              07/14/95

-------
                                       Table 18
             Chemicals of Concern in Site 5 Groundwater — Deep Bedrock*
                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organic*
Acetone
Benzene
Bi»(2-cthylhexyl)
phthalate
sec-Butylbenzene


4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
12-Dichlorobenzene
M-Dichlarobeozene
Dichlorndifluorfflnetnane
1,1-Dichloroethane
12-Dkhloroethane
Dicthyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ethyibenzene
Methyl chloride
N>pbthilf"f-
n-Propyibenzene
Tetrachloroetheae
Trichloroetheae
12,4-TrimethyIbenzene
Frequency
of
Detection"

1/3
6/15
4/15
6/15
8/15
4/15
6/15
7/15
2/15
3/15
6/15
5/15
4/15
1/15
1/15
1/15
3/15
5/15
3/15
5/15
4/15
Range of Sample
Quantitation
1 .imifrc
(<«/L)

10
0.70-1.0
10-13
1.0
1.0-12
10-13
0.50-2.0
050-1.0
2.0-9.0
0.40-1.0
020-1.0
10-13
10-13
10-13
1.0
0.40-10
1.0
1.0
020-1.0
0.60-1.0
1.0
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations1
(«B/L)

46
0.40(0.60)-8.9(14)
2.0(1.0)-6.2(8.0)
030(0.10)-3.0
0.40(030)-50(80)
4.0(10)-7.7(10)
030(020)-8.9(32)
035(020)-20(38)
3.9(2.0)-13(23)
0.42(0.99)-14(15)
023(020)-
0.93(22)
4.0(1.0)-65(11)
4^(10)-62(8.0)
5.6(6.0)
25(0.90-4.0)
0.98(33)
055(0.40)-10
020-3.0
035(020)-
12(53)
035(020)-
43(8.0)
0.10-4.0
Mean
Concentration"
(«/L)

19
U
4.9
0.82
6.7
5.4
15
5.6
3.0
1.7
0.41
5.1
53
53
0.63
0.77
12
0.76
0.43
0.74
0.73
Upper 95%
Confidence Limit
of the Mean
Concentration
(/«/L)

59*
2.6
5.4
12
13
5.8
2.6
8.9
43
33
0.49
5.4
5.4
5.4
0.86
0.89
2.4
1.1
054
12
1.1
MK01\m:0062KB6.0M\»OMlrod.**
A-36
                                                                               07/14/93

-------
                                                 Table 18

                    Chemicals of Concern in Site 5 Groundwater  — Deep Bedrock"
                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                               (Continued)
Chemical
Inorganics
Arsenic (filtered)
(total)
Boron (filtered)
(total)
Iron (filtered)
(total)
Frequency
of
Detection"
Range of Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(«B/L)
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations0
(MB/L).

8/15
7/15
6/15
5/15
13/15
15/15
5.0-10
5.0
100
100
40-291
Aff
3.0(5.0)-135(187)
5.0(7.0)-146(195)
82(113)-304(340)
99(142)-269
40(45)-
36,150(64,800)
5,710(4,600)-
105,450(130,000)
Mean
Concentration11
(«B/L)
Upper 95%
Confidence Limit
of the Mean
Concentration
(«B/L)

38
44
100
93
8,764
30,606
62
71
139
126
15,092
44,612
The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
"Number of wells at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of wells.
If the minimum or maximum detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum averaged
 concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
"Arithmetic mean based on the averaged concentrations.
"Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
'Sample quantitation limits were not available. The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
      MK01\RPT:0«2S026.004 \zootlrod.tpi
A-37
                                                                                              07/14/95

-------
                                                 Table 19

                    Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Groundwater  — Water Table*
                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organic*
Arodor-1260
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
2-Butanone
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dicblorodifluoromethane
1^-Dichloroethane
Methyl chloride
Frequency
of
Detection"

1/9
5/9
1/11
1/9
1/12
1/12
1/12
Range of Sample
Quantitation
T imifc
(*/L)

1.0-1.1
10-12
10
10-12
2.0
1.0
2.0
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'
te/L)

1.8
1.0-1,100
13
25
0.40
0.20
15(3.0)
Mean
Concentration*
(AS/L)

0.67
126
5.7
73
0.95*
0.48*
1.0
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(«/L)

0.93
352
7.0
11
1.0*
0-5?
1.1
PAHs
Pyrcne
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Trichlo'ofluoT'Oincthtne
Inorganics
Calcium (filtered)
Iron (filtered)
Mammtiiim (ftltomi)
Mmganeie (filtered)
Poussium (filtered)
Silicon (filtered)
Sodium (filtered)
1/9
3/12
2/12
3/12

9/9
6/8
9/9
9/9
1/9
9/9
9/9
10-12
1.0
1.0
1.0

2001
40
200'
10
5,000
300*
6,240
3.0
0.20-16
0.20-0.80(2.0)
0.10-0.40(020)

4,970-150,000
55(42)-35,100
747-28^00
23(21)-13,900
4305(7,710-
8,120)
3,650-
6,193(6,840)
3,890-35,800
4.9*
1.7
0.50
0.43-

43,474
4,440
8,907
1,901
2,701
5,273
15,956
53'
4.1
0.57
Q3T

70^59
12,740
14,154
4,708
3,074
5,810
22^77
The listed chemicals were selected as chcmirak of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
"Number of wells at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of wells.
If the minimum or «y«mimi detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum averaged
 concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
"Arithmetic mean based on the averaged concentrations,
•Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
Sample quantitation limits were not available. The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
                                                  A-38
07/14/93

-------
                                                 Table 20

                   Chemicals of Concern in Site 44 Groundwater — Deep Bedrock*
                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Organic;
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,1-Trichloroe thane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Frequency
of
Detection"
Range of
Sample
Quantitation
Limits
(«/L)

1/4
1/4
1/4
1/4
1/4
1/4
10
0.50-1.0
2.0-9.0
0.20-1.0
020-1.0
1.0-5.0
Range of
Averaged
(Detected)
Concentrations'
te/L)

4.0(1.0)
0.43(0.60)
23(1.0-2.0)
0.54(0.40-1.0)
0.43(0.40-0.90)
1.8(3.0)
Mean
Concentration"
0«/L)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit of the
Mean
Concentration
(/«/L)

4.8*
0.48*
13
0.51
0.48e
0.98
53e
Qjsy
2.1'
0.53
0.52s
i.r
Inorganics
Iron (filtered)
(total)
Sodium (filtered)
(total)
2/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
40
4tf
900f
900*
526(58)-1310
9,740-
72,050(104,000)
4200(4,160)-
10,080(12,400)
4,445(3,890)-
32,000
469
32,685
6,138
16309
1,186
66,935
9391
30497
The listed chemicals were selected as chemicals of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
"Number of wells at which the chemical was detected compared with the total number of wells.
If the minimum or maximum detected concentration differed from the respective minimum or maximum averaged
 concentration, the detected concentration is given in parentheses.
"Arithmetic mean based on the averaged concentrations.
•Exceeds the maximum detected and/or averaged concentrations.
'Sample quantitation limits were not available.  The method detection limit is indicated (G-563).
      MK01UUT:0062S026.004\iooelrod.ip»
A-39
                                                                                              07/14/95

-------
                                         Table 21
                       Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
                                  Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
C^wnircal
Quanta
Acetone
Arodor-1260
Benzene


Btt2-etbvlhexvh ohthalate
2-Butsoone
fec-Butvtbenzene
Butvi benzyl chtfaalate
ateba-CUonUne
wnma-Qilcptane
Cblordanef total)
Qdorobenaene
Chloroethane

4— CMoro— 3— metnviDoenol
4.4--DDD
4.4--DDE
4.4--DDT
DibcoBoftirtD
1,2 • DidikMobcnzmt
1.4-DKhJorot.enane
: Soil
Site 2
0— 2ft




X














X


^ 	
1.2-Dichloioetfaane
cis-U-DichloiDeihene
1.2-Dicntaoetnene (tout)
Dieldrin
Diettnl ether

JMIflVi PHI IH| eWB

>i-n-butvl ohthalase
2,4— Duutioiibftool



AOOrUOVlD^B^BO^
Metbvl diloride
2-MetMnsoJnhtlene
4*ohth«lene
4-NitroDhenot
n— Niti*^^lk>b««vl«'»«««
>AHl
Acenaobtbeae

Anthreoene
Benotatenthraoene
Benaofatovnae











X
X



X
-X
X
X
x
Site 4
0— 2ft




x°

Xs









x"
x-
X8
X










x* 	
X





X
X
X

X

X*
X
x
Site 44
0— 2ft




x°

Xs









x°
X
X
X






0— 15ft




•f

if









Tf
X
X
X






x" !




X





X
X



X
X*
X
Xs
if

X*





X
X



X
x°
X
Xs
x*
Groundwater"
Site 2 Site 4 Site 5
WT WT DB ' WT DB
Site 44
WT i DB
















































x
















X

X


X


X
X


X

I X X

i













X

























X

X




I
!
i



I










x 1 - x
X
X




X

X
X

X


X
X
X
X



X


X









X




X

X
X
X




X
X
L *

X


X

X











x
X

X












X


1
I
j

1






1


X X
X



1 i









X




























MX01\RFT«062S02«JM\zlrod2l.i>k3
                                          A-40
                                                                                 U-Jul-95

-------
                                                Table 21

                           Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium*
                                        Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                              (Continued)
Chemical
Soil
Site 2
0-2 ft
Site 4
0-2 ft
Site 44
0-2 ft 10- 15 ft
Groundwaterb
Site 2
WT
Oreaaics ('continued)
Benzofb)fluoranthene
Benzofzijtocrvlene
Benzo(k)fluoramhene
Chrysene
DibenzofaJrtanthracene
Fluorantheae
Fluorene
Indenofl.23-cd)pvrene
Fhenanthrene
Pyrene
n— fhopvlbenzene
Tetracfaloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Tricfalorofluoromethane
1.2.4— Trimethvibenzene _^
1.3.5-Trimethvlbenzene
Vinyl chloride
m,p-Xylenes (total)
o— Xylene
iX^enes (total)
Inorganics
'Aluminum
Arsenic
barium
i Beryllium
j Boron
^adniiuni
Calcium
ZBroroflwi
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
vlaenesium
rianeanese
Mercury
Nickel
~OtŁSS]URl
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium
[halliuin
[Itanium
Vanadium -
Zinc
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X











X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x°












if
X0
if
x°
X6
X0
X
x°
X
if












X6
X0
X6
jf
x°
X0
X
jf
X
x°









































X



X

X


X
X







X







X



X

X
X
X





X
X












X

X
X
X





X
X














Site 4
WT 1 DB
SiteS
Site 44
WT 1 DB WT DB I














i
x
X



!

1
















X






X
X






X




X
X


i







• ,
X ' !
X
xxx

X !
x i x x I



X




X





X X


























X




X









X
X


X



X
X























X





X


X



X

X
X

X

X


X

X




X


X





X












! |
X i



X X 1

x !
x |


X
i 1
X ' 1



X X

!



'An V indicates that the chemical was selected as a chemical of concern for both the human health and ecological risk
assessments, unless otherwise indicated.
''Selected as chemicals of concern for the human health risk assessment only.
'Chemical was hot detected above background.
'Selected as a chemical of concern for the ecological risk assessment only.

DB=Deep bedrock.
WT=Water table.
MK01\RFT:0062S026.00*zlrod2Lwk3
                                                  A-41
                                                                                                  18-Jul-95

-------
                                       Table 22
                Most Reasonable Maximally Exposed Receptor (RME)/
                           Other Primary Potential Receptors
                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Pathway/
Data Set
SoU
Site 2
Site 4
Site 44
Current Scenario
RME

Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Maintenance
worker
Others

Trespasser
Trespasser
Trespasser
Future Scenario
RME

Maintenance worker
Maintenance worker
Maintenance worker
Others

Trespasser
Trespasser
Building
worker,
trespasser
Groundtvater
If -2 Water Table
LF-2 Deep Bedrock
LF-4 Water Table
LF-5 Water Table
LF-5 Deep Bedrock
PCDA Water Table
PCDADeep
Bedrock
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
On-zone resident
On-zone resident
On-zone resident
On-zone resident
On-zone resident
On-zone resident
On-zone resident
On-zone
worker
On-zone
worker
On-zone
worker
On-zone
worker
On-zone
worker
On-zone
worker
On-zone
worker
MK01MPT:0062l<&6.a*\a«clnd.4
A-42
                                                                              07/14*3

-------
                                                            Table 23
                                  Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
                                                     Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Medium
Soil*
LF-2 (0 to 2 feet
deep)
LF 4 (0 to 2 feet
deep)
PCDA (0 to 2
feet deep)
PCDA (0 to 15
feet deep)
RME

Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Current maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Future maintenance
worker
Groundwater*
LF-2 Water
Table
Future cm-zone
resident
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk*'
Mean

8E-07 (ALL)
8E-07 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
3E-07 (ALL)
3E-07 (BG)
6E-08 (ALL)
6E-11 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
3E-09 (BG)
3E-06 (ALL)
2E-09 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum

2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
5E-06 (ALL)
5E-06 (BG)
4E-07 (ALL)
4E-07 (BG)
7E-07 (ALL)
7E-07 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
1E-10 (BG)
4E-06 (ALL)
6E-09 (BG)
4E-06 (ALL)
4E-09 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
2E-06 (BG)
5E-06 (ALL)
5E-06 (BG)
7E-07 (ALL)
7E-07 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
1E-06 (BG)
1E-07 (ALL)
1E-10 (BG)
6E-06 (ALL)
6E-09 (BG)
9E-06 (ALL)
5E-09 (BG)
Total Hazard Index*'
Mean

3E-05 (ALL)
3E-05 (BG)
6E-05 (ALL)
6E-05 (BG)
6E-04 (ALL)
6E-04 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
9E-04 (ALL)
9E-04 (BG)
4E-02 (ALL)
4E-02 (BG)
3E-02 (ALL)
3E-02 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum

8E-05 (ALL)
8E-05 (BG)
2E-04 (ALL)
2E-04 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
4E-03 (ALL)
4E-03 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
1E-01 (ALL)
1E-01 (BG)
8E-02 (ALL)
8E-02 (BG)
8E-05 (ALL)
8E-05 (BG)
2E-04 (ALL)
2E-04 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
4E-03 (ALL)
4E-03 (BG)
2E-03 to 3E-03 (ALL)'
2E-03 to 3E-03 (BG)'
1E-01 (ALL)
1E-01 (BG)
9E-02 (ALL)
9E-02 (BG)

1E-07
(Filtered)
1E-07
(Filtered)
1E-07
(Filtered)
2E-03
(Filtered)
3E-03
(filtered)
3E-03
(filtered)
MK01\RFI':U0628026.004\?.onelrod.apa
A-43
                                                              07/14/95

-------
                                                                Table 23
                                     Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
                                                         Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                               (Continued)
Medium
GrtNMdwnW (Con
LF-4 Water
Table
LF-2 Deep
Bedrock
LF-5 Water
Table
LF-5 Deep
Bedrock
PCDA Water
Table
PCDA Deep
Bedrock
i
RME
Owed)
Future on-zone
resident
Future on-zone
resident
Future on-zone
resident
Future on-zone
resident
Future on-zone
resident
Future on-zone
resident
Total Lifetime Cancer Risk**
Mean

8E-07
(filtered)
NA
5E-04
(filtered)
8E-04
(filtered)
9E-04
(total)
8E-05
(filtered)
7E-07
(filtered)
7E-07
(total)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit

8E-07
(filtered)
NA
1E-03
(filtered)
1E-03
(filtered)
1E-03
(total)
1E-04
(filtered)
7E-07
(filtered)
7E-07
(total)
Maximum

8E-07
(filtered)
NA
3E-03
(filtered)
3E-03
(filtered)
3E-03
(total)
4E-04
(filtered)
7E-07
(filtered)
7E-07
(total)
Total Hazard Index**
Mean

3E-01
(filtered)
8E-04
(filtered)
8E-04
(total)
9E+00
(filtered)
4E+00
(filtered)
4E+00
(total)
IE + 01
(filtered)
4E-03
(filtered)
4E-03
(total)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
Maximum

5E-01
(filtered)
1E-03
(filtered)
1E-03
(total)
IE +01
(filtered)
6E+00
(filtered)
7E+00
(total)
3E+01
(filtered)
5E-03
(filtered)
5E03
(total)
5E-01
(filtered)
1E-03
(filtered)
1E-03
(total)
4E+01
(filtered)
1E+01
(filtered)
2E+01
(total)
8E+01
(filtered)
5E-03
(filtered)
5E-03
(total)
  'Values are rounded, to one significant figure.
   Maximum cancer risk at hazardous waste sit<
   not of concern.
sites is regulated in the range of 1E-06 to 1E-04 (10* to 10"*).  Risks of less than 1E-06 (10*) are generally
MIU>l\KFT:00628026004\zonelro
-------
                                                                    Table 23

                                       Summary of Total  Lifetime Cancer Risks and Hazard Indices
                             '                              Zone I, Pease AFB, NH
                                                                  (Continued)

  CA hazard index of 1 (IE+00) or greater is usually considered the benchmark of potential concern.
  dALL  -  Includes all evaluated chemicals of concern.
   BG = Includes only the evaluated chemicals of concern that were detected above background.
  The first and second values are based on the assumption that chromium is present entirely as chromium HI and chromium VI, respectively.  A range is present
   only if the two values differed after rounding to one significant figure.
  'Filtered and total values are based on organics data plus inorganics data for filtered and unfiltered (total) samples, respectively.
  NA  = Not applicable. There were no carcinogenic chemicals of concern.
MK01\RJT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apa                                           A-45                                                                07/14/95

-------
                                      Table 24

                  Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
                          for the Short-tailed Shrew, Site 2
                               Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
I
: Che""*9'
Hazard Quotients for
Invertebrate
Ingestion
Average
Hazard Quotients for
Soil Ingestion
Niixmi***** j AvciHffG
Marimum
i
Total
Hazard Indices
Average
Maximum '
Orgxaics
Benzokacid '
Dibenzofuran
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.75E-04
NE
7.73E-03
5^7E-04
3.03E-04
NE
1.88E-02
1J2E-03
1.75E-04
NE
7.73E-03
5.57E-04
; 3.03E-04 j
NE ;
1.88E-02 !
U2E-03 ,
PAHs il
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(&h4)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a4i)anthracene
Fhioranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,23-cd)pyrene
| Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Xyfenes (total)
1.94E-03
NE
2.83E-04
9.23E-01
1.71E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.76E-02
8.70E-03
NE
2.77E+00
3J7E-02
NE

4.14E-03
NE
7.69E-04
2.69E+00
4.98E-01
9.45E-05
NE
531E-05
727E-02
4.84E-03
NE NE
NE ' NE
2.02E-04 2.03E-03
NE
1.44E-04
2.12E-01
1.41E-02
NE
NE
NE : NE NE
NE NE
NE NE
NE
NE
521E-02 2.14E-03 636E-03
2-T7E-02
NE
8.24E+00
9.98E-02
NE
4.25E-04
NE
226E-01
358E-03
2.02E-07
1.16E-03
NE
6.71E-01
1.06E-02
2.02E-07
Conalative Hazard Index:
434E-03 ii
NE NE !!
336E-04
9.96E-01
1.76E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.97E-02
9.12E-03
NE
3.00E+00
3.73E-02
2.02E-07
4J5E-I-00
9.14E-04 j
2.90E+00 1
5.12E-01 1
NE
NE
NE
NE ji
NE ;
5.84E-02
2.48E-02 ,
NE l
8.91E+00
1.10E-01 !
2.02E-07
1.25E+01 !
NE - Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV.
MK01\RFT:00628>26.00«zlrod24.wk3
A-46
                                                                              lS-Jul-95

-------
                                        Table 25

                   Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
                           for the Short-tailed Shrew, Site 4
                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
ii
Chemical
i Hazard Quotients for
Invertebrate
• Ingestion
Average
Maximum
Hazard Quotients for
Soil Ingestion
Average
total
Hazard Indices
Maximum | Average
Maximum
Organics
Benzoic acid*
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea
4,4'-DDD"
M'-DDE"
4,4'-DD1*
Dibenzofuran
Di- n - butyl phthalate*
2,4 - Dinitrophenol
Naphthalene
n- Nitrosodiphenyiamine
p-Nitrophenol
NE
NE
1.81E-04
1.17E-02
2.02E+00
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
2.18E-04
1.17E-02
2.20E+00
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
8.16E-05
2.73E-04
2.11E-07
1.50E-05
1.89E-03
NE
152E-05
S.06E-04
4.93E-05
2.96E-05
7.60E-03
2.67E-04
2.74E-04
2.53E-07
1JOE-05
2.06E-03
NE
1.59E-05
5.06E-04
8.16E-05
2.73E-04
1.82E-04
1.17E-02
2.67E-04
2.74E-04
2.18E-04 '
1.17E-02
2.02E+00 2.20E+00
NE NE
1J2E-05 1J9E-05
5.06E-04
6.69E-05 4.93E-05
2.96E-05
7.60E-03
2.96E-05
7.60E-03
5.06E-04
6.69E-05
2.96E-05
7.60E-03
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno( 1,23 - cd)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
9.47E-04
433E-05
1.49E-01
239E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
230E-03
133E-03
NE
2.16E-01
2.00E-03
1.82E-03
6.92E-05
7.95E-01
133E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.42E-02
2.43E-03
NE
130E+00
9.53E-03
4.62E-05
8.13E-06^
1.17E-02
6.79E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
2.81E-04
6.47E-05
NE
1.75E-02
2.12E-04
8.87E-05
130E-05
626E-02
3.76E-03
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.73E-03
1.18E-04
NE
1.06E-01
1.01E-03
9.93E-04
5.14E-05
1.60E-01
2.46E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
1.91E-03
822E-05
8^7E-01 ;i
136E-01 'I
NEjl
NE!!
NEii
NE '
NE '
2.58E-03 j 1J9E-02
139E-03 2.54E-03 ,
NE NE j.
233E-01 1.41E+00 \
221E-03 : 1.05E-02
Inorganics :
Parimjiiff;
Copper
Lead
Mercury „
Nickel
Zinc
1.12E+02
4.18E-01
1.04E+04
3.08E+00
1.69E+01
l.OSE-t-02

4.05E+02
9.52E-01
3.21E+04
3.26E+01
326E+01
2.90E+02
137E-01
1.10E-02
230E+00
2.03E-02
1.18E-01
1.15E-01
4.94E-01
2JOE-02
7.12E-KK)
2.15E-01
228E-01
3.08E-01
Cumulative Hazard Index:
Cumulative Hazard Index:
(Above Background)
U2E+02 : 4.05E+02
429E-01 : 9.77E-01 ,
1.04E+04 . 321E+04
3.10E+00 L3^8E+01
1.70E+01
1.08E+02
328E+01 !
2.90E+02
1.06E+04 329E+04
1.06E+04 328E+04
 NE - Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV.
 a — Soil concentration below background level.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004^1rodZ5.wk3
                                          A-47
                                                                                 18-Jul-95

-------
                                        Table 26

                   Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
                          for the Short-tailed Shrew, Site 44
                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Hazard Quotients for
Invertebrate
Ingestion
Average
Maximum
Hazard Quotients for
Soil Ingestion
Average
Maximum
Total
Hazard Indices
Average
Maximum
Orgutks
j Benzole add*
| Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea
1 4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT_
! Dibenzofuran
Dieldrin
' Di-n-butylphthalate*
2-Methyhiaphthalene
Naphthalene
NE
ME
138E-03
2.11E-01
2.09E+01
NE
1.48E+01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
3.05E-03
4.92E-01
4.45E+01
NE
2.82E-04
2.61E-04
1.60E-06
2.71E-04
1.%E-02
NE
1.48E+01 '1.44E-02
NE 2.74E-05
NE J8.86E-04
NE '8.81E-05
2.82E-04 I 2.82E-04 2.82E-04
2.74E-04
3J4E-06
632E-04
4.18E-02
NE
1.44E-02
2.74E-05
8.86E-04
8.81E-05
2.61E-04
138E-03
2.74E-04 i
3.05E-03
2.11E-01 : 4.92E-01
2.09E+01
NE
4.45E+01
NE
1.48E+01 1.48E+01
2.74E-05 2.74E-05
8.86E-04 i 8.86E-04
8.81E-05 j 8.81E-05 |
PAHs i
Acenaphtbene
i Acenaphthylene*
Anthracene
: Benzo(a)anthracenea
: Ben2o(a)pyrene1
• Benzo(b)fluoranthenea
Benzo(&]M)pervlenea
Benzo(k)fluoranthenea
! Chrysene*
Dibenzo(aji)anthracenea
FluoTantbenea
Fluorene
Indeno(l,23-cd)pvrenea
Phenaathrene
Pyrene*
3.47E-04
NE
3.98E-OJ
636E-02
1.03E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
951E-04
L27E-03
NE
1.01E-01
134E-03
3.47E-04 1.69E-05 1.69E-05
NE NE
8.65E-05 7.48E-06
1.62E-01
2.44E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
4.02E-03
2.43E-03
NE
539E-01
4.45E-03
5.01E-03
2.93E-04
NE
NE_,
NE
NE
NE
1.16E-04
621E-:05
NE
823E-03
1.43E-04
NE
1.63E-05
128E-02
L6.92E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
4.91E-04
1.18E-04
NE
438E-02
4.72E-04
3.63E-04 3.63E-04 |
NE
4.73E-05
6.86E-02
1.06E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE !
1.03E-04 _,
1.75E-01
2J1E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE • NE ,
NE ' NE i
1.07E-03 i 4^1E-03 j
133E-03 2J4E-03 1
NE NE
1.09E-01 i 5^3E-01
1.49E-03 i 4.92E-03
laorgtaies
CfOTOOtttUD
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Titanium
Vanadium
3.17E+01
1.42E+04
5.51E-01
1.81E+00
1-.63E+01
NE
NE
i
5.0SE+01
4.14E+04
U5E+00
4.04E+00
3J)5E+01
NE
NE
3.87E-01
3.16E+00
2.69E-02
120E-02
1.13E-01
NE
5.00E+00
Cumulative Hazard
6.17E-01
9.18E+00
6.60E-02
2.67E-02
2.13E-01
NE
1.57E+01
nder
3.21E+01
1.43E+04
5.78E-01
1^2E-KX)
1.64E+01
NE
5.00E+00
1.43E+04
Cumulative Hazard Index:
(Above Background) 1 43E+04
5.12E-I-01
4.14E+04
1.42E+00
4J07E+00
3.08E+01
NE !
1.57E+01
4.15E+04
4.15E+04
NE- Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV.
a - Soil concentration below background level
MK01\RPT:0062aD26.00«zlrod2«.wk3
A-48
18-Jul-95

-------
                                                   Table 27
                               Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
                                              for the Robin, Site 2
                                            Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Hazard Quotients for
Invertebrate
Ingestion
Average Maximum
Hazard Quotients for
Soil Ingestion
Average
Maximum
Hazard Quotients for
Surface Water
Ingestion
Average Maximum
j
Hazard Indices 1
Average Maximum :
Organic;
Beozoic acid
Bis(2 - ethyl hexyl)pblhalate
Chlorobenzene
4,4'-DDD
4,4'- DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dibenzofuran
1,4 — Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
2 - Methyloaphtbalene
Naphthalene
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE i NE
NE NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
4.71E-04
2.08E-04
2.22E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
2.34E-03
1.03E-03
4.31E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
PAHs
Acenaphlhene
Acenapbthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthneene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b )fl uoranthene
Benzo(g,b,i )perylene
Benzoflclfluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fl uoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Tetiachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes (total)
NE
3.63E-04
4.48E-04
3.03E-04
1.49E-03
4.40E-03
3.24E-03
2.31E-03
2.68E-03
2.37E-03
1.61E-03
2.36E-03
1.17E-03
3.61E-04
4.17E-03
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE NE
7.7gŁ-04
1.03E-03
8.25E-04
4.33E-03
1.28E-02
9.40E-03
6.68E-03
7.80E-03
6.91E-03
4.23E-03
6.98E-03
3.17E-03
1.01E-03
1.24E-02
NE
NE
NE
NE
7.27E-05
8.97E-05
2.33E-04
4.79E-04
5.11E-04
4.05E-04
3.79E-04
NE
1.S6E-04
2.06E-04
6.35E-04
1.40E-03
1.49E-03
1.17E-03
1.10E-03
4.25E-04 1.24E-03
5.38E-04
1.75E-04
1.18E-03
2.33E-04
3.29E-04
1.39E-03
NE
NE
NE
1.80E-06
1.57E-03
4.60E-04
3.49E-03
6.3JE-04
9.21E-04
4.13E-03
NE
NE
NE
1.80E-06
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
• NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
InorgMoics
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Chromium (trivaleat)
Chromium (hexavalent)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
3.49E-01
NE
NE
4.0Ł-02
7.2SE-04 j
3.7«E-03
4.17E-03
NE
8.9SE-03
3.21E-01
1.30E-03
1.8SE-01
4.74E-05
9.88E-04
NE
1.22E-01
1.01E-02
NE
4.24E+00
NE
NE
1.19E-01
2.51E-03
2.69E-02
2.99E-02
NE
1.92E-01
1.06E+01
2.6CE-02
3.49E+00
4.74E-04
1.02E-02
NE
NE
NE
4.71E-04
2.08E-04
2.22E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE !
NE
2.34E-03 i
1.03E-03 i1
4.31E-04 !'
NE j
NE ||
NE |j
NE i'
NE j NE
NE | NE
(I
NE
4.3SE-04
5.38E-04
5.37E-04
1.97E-03
4.91E-03
3.64E-03
2.69E-03
3.11E-03
2.91E-03
1.78E-03
3.J3E-03
1.40E-03
6.90E-04
5.56E-03
NE
NE
NE
1.80E-06
NE ;|
9.33E-04 l|
1.24E-03 ;
1.46E-03 il
5.73E-03 !
1.43E-02 1
1.06E-02 J
7.78E-03
9.04E-03
8.49E-03
4.70E-03
1.05E-02
3.81E-03
1.93E-03
1.6JE-02
NE 1
NE
NE
1.80E-06

NE
3.49E-01
NE
- NE
4.0«E-02
7.25E-04
3.76E-03
4.17E-03
NE
8.9SE-03
3.21E-01
NE !
4.24E+00
NE !
NE
1.19E-01
2.51E-03
2.69E-02
2.99E-02
NE
1.92E-01
1.06E+01
1.30E-03 | 2.60E-02
1.85E-01
4.74E-05
3.49E+00
4.74E-04
9.88E-04 j 1.02E-02
NE NE NE
1.56E+00 j 1.22E-01 ! 1.56E+00
2.20E-01 , 1.01E-02 ; 2.20E-01 i
 NE - Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV.
Cumulative Hazard Index:
                                                                                          1.08E+00
                                         2.06E+01
MX01\WT:0062W26.004\zltodZ7.wk3
                                                     A-49
                                                                                                        18-J«1-9S

-------
                                               Table 28
                            Summary of Hazard Quotients mod Hazard Indices
                                         for the Robin, Site 4
                                        Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
! Orguua
Beozoic acid*
: Bistt-ethylheivnDluhalate'
1 ftaouna-BHC
; Chlorobenzene
4.4--DDD1
4.4'- DDE1
4.4--DDT
Dibenzotean
Di-a-buM pbthttote*
1 ,4 - Dichlorobeazene
2.4-Dimtropkenot
Naphthalene
n - NitroaodiDhenvUmine
D-Nitroohenot
Hazard Quotient! for
Invertebrate
Ingestton
Averaae

NE
NE
NE
NE
8.82E-03
1.27E-02
1.12E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
M'TJiBin

NE
NE
NE
NE
1.06E-02
1.27E-02
1.22E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Hazard Quotients for
Soil InaesUoa
Average

NE
NE
NE
NE
4.20E-05
6.67E-05
4.32E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Maxim urn

NE
NE
NE
NE
3.04E-05
6.67E-03
4.70E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Hazard Quotients for
Surface Water
Ingestioa
Average

NE
NE
7.1SE-05
NE
3.37E-06
4.42E-05
2.17E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE NE
Kfarimuin

NE
NE
8.04E-03
NE
6.16E-06
4.89E-05
6.03E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
PAHt
AceMDhtbeae
Anthracene
Beozotalanthraeene
BenzoUtovreae
Benzofbttuonathene
BenzofLhJtoetvieae
Beazofklfluonuuhene
Chroeae
Dibenzitfajiteathraceae
nnonnthene
Fluoreae
1.78E-04
4.64E-05
2.39E-04
6.16E-04
3.6JE-04
3.76E-04
4.30E-04
3.53E-04
3.78E-04
3.09E-04
USE -04
IndenoflOJ-cd^pwene 6.69E-05
Pbeoanthrene
Pvrene
1.61E-04
Tetrachloroetheae NE
3.41E-04
7.43E-05
USE -03
3.41E-03
3.05E-03
1.74E-03
2.40E-03
1.S9E-03
8.91E-04
1.90E-03
3.25E-04
2.97E-04
1.95E-03
7.67E-04
NE
Inornate*
Aluminum
Bahum
Boron
Calcium
Cadmium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Mainenum
Mercury
Nickel
SiKcoo

NE
NE
NE
NE
2.19E+00
4.02E+00
NE
6.97E+01
NE
1.13E-01
2.07E+00
NE
7.35E+01
NE
NE
NE
NE
791E+00
9.13E+00
NE
2.16E-MJ2
NE
1.20E+00
3.99E+00
NE
1.97E+02
NE - Not evaluated due to lack of doee and/or ci'v.
a - Soil coacentration below background level.
3.56E-05
3.S7E-OS
7.71E-05
7.16E-05
7.06E-OS
6.16E-03
6.83E-03
8.02E-05
4.11E-05
1.54E-04
3.56E-05
6.0SE-05
LOSE -04
7.00E-03
NE

NE
NE
NE
NE
1.10E-02
4.32E-01
NE
6.34E-02
NE
3.05E-03
392E-02
NE
3 JOE -01


6.83E-05
3.71E-03
4.13E-04
3.97E-04
3.81E-04
2.86E-04
3.81E-04
4.29E-04
968E-03
9.52E-04
6.31E-03
2.70E-04
6.31E-04
3.33E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE 1 NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE

NE
NE
NE
NE
3.96E-02
9.84E-01
NE
l.ME-01
NE
3.23E-02
1.14E-01
NE
8.36E-01
NE
NE
2.37E-02
NE
NE
6.61E-03
3.25E-02
NE
7.32E-03
NE
NE
NE
844E-03
NE
NE
7.11E-02
NE
NE
2J7E-02
1.37E-OI
NE
I.07E-02
NE
NE
NE
330E-02
Cumulative Hazard Index:
Cumulative Hazard Index:
C Above "f.fkiroup'ft
Total
Hazard Indices
Average

NE
NE
7.13E-03
NE
8.87E-03
1.28E-02
1.13E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Maximum :

NE
NE
8.04E-03
NE
1.06E-02 |
1.28E-02
1.23E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE :
NE
NE

2.13E-04 4.10E-04 •
8.21E-05
3.16E-04
6.87E-04
6.36E-04
4.37E-04
4.98E-04
4.33E-04
4.19E-04
4.63E-04
2.13E-04
1.28E-04
4.32E-04
2.31E-04
NE
1.31E-04 |
1.69E-03 !
3.81E-03
3.43E-03
2.03E-03 '
2.78E-03
2.31E-03
9.88E-04
2.86E-03
3.90E-04
5.67E-04 i
2.60E-03 "
HOE -03 "
NE i
;i
NE
NE
2.37E-02
NE
2.20E+00
4.43E+00
3.25E-02
6.98E+01
7.32E-03
1.16E-01
2.13E+00
NE
7 39E+01

1 33E+02
NE H
NE
7.11E-02
NE
7.95E+00
1.02E+01
1.37E-01 !
2.UE+02
1.07E-02
1.23E+00
4.10E+00
NE 1
1 98E+02

438E-MH
MK01\RPTM(2nM.OO«alndZt.i*3
                                                A-50
                                                                                               U-Jul-M

-------
                                        Table 29

                   Summary of Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indices
                                 for the Robin, Site 44
                                Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Chemical
Hazard Quotients for
Invertebrate
Ingestion
Average
Maximum
Hazard Quotients for
Soil Ingestion
Average
Maximum
Total
Hazard Indices
Average
Maximum
Orgaaics
Benzole acid3
Bis(2- ethylhexyi)phthalatea
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dibenzofuran
Dieldrin
Di-n-butylphthalatea
2-Methylnapbthalene
Naphthalene
NE
NE
6.70E-02
2.28E-01
1.16E+00
NE
136E-01
NE
NE
. NE
NE
NE
1.48E-01
532E-01
2.48E+00
NE
136E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
3.19E-04
120E-03
4.47E-03
NE
5.45E-04
NE
NE
NE
NE
7.06E-04
2.80E-03
9J3E-03
NE
5.45E-04
NE
NE
NE NE
NE
NE
6.74E-02
2.29E-01
1.17E+00
NE
137E-01
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE '•
1.49E-01
535E-01
2.49E-t-00 !
NE!
137E-01 ;
NE
NE
NE i
PAHs
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylenea
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracenea
! Benzo(a)pyrenea
Benzo(b)fluoranthene*
Benzo(gji4)perylenea
Benzo(k)fluoranthenea
Chrysene*
Dibenzo(a,h)anthiacenea
Fluoranthene2
Fluorene
Indeno( 1 A3 - cd)pyrenea
Phenanthrene
Pyrenea
6J1E-05
135E-04
4.27E-05
1.02E-04
2.66E-04
2.72E-04
1.74E-04
2.14E-04
1.74E-04
1.16E-04
1.28E-04
1.71E-04
3.06E-05
1.52E-04
1.08E-04
6.51E-05 !130E-05
135E-04 :2.70E-05
929E-05 3.29E-05
2.61E-04
330E-05
628E-04 3.10E-05
5.46E-04 3.40E-05
3.49E-04 '2.86E-05
4.60E-04
4.47E-04
1.61E-04
5.40E-04
3.25E-04
5.94E-05
8.10E-04
3.58E-04
3.40E-05
3.95E-05
126E-05
638E-05
3.41E-05
2.78E-05
5.06E-05
4.70E-05
UOE-05^
2.70E-05
7.14E-05
8.41E-05
730E-05
6.83E-05
5.71E-05
730E-05
1.02E-04
1.75E-05
2.70E-04
6^1E-05
5.40E-05
2.70E-04
7.81E-05
1.62E-04
7.56E-05
135E-04
2.97E-04
3.06E-04
2.03E-04
2.48E-04
7.81E-05
1.62E-04 '.
1.64E-04
3.45E-04 •
7.01E-04 [
6.14E-04 :
4.06E-04
533E-04
2.13E-04 5.49E-04
129E-04 1.78E-04
1.91E-04 . 8.10E-04
2.05E-04 ; 3.90E-04
5.83E-05 1.13E-04
2.03E-04 1.08E-03 j
1.56E-04 155E-04 • 5.13E-04 |!
Inorganics
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Titanium
Vanadium
6.65E+01
9.59E+01
9.13E+00
6.65E-02
1.99E+00
NE
NE

1.06E-I-02
2.78E+02
2.24E+01
1.48E-01
3.74E+00
NE
NE
332E+00
8.71E-02
1.83E+00
1.80E-03
5.68E-02
NE
3.58E+00
530E+00
2J3E-01
6.98E+01 :
959E-f01
1.11E+02 i
2.79E+02J
4.47E+00 1.10E+01 2.68E+01
4.01E-03 L6-83E-02 1 lJ2E-01j
1.07E-01
NE
2.05E+00
NE
3.84E+00 1
NE ij
1.13E+01 ! 3J8E-fOO 1.13E+01
Cumulative Hazard Index: 1.84E+02
Cumulative Hazard Index: i
(Above Backeround) ! 1.84E+02
435E+02 I
1'
435E+02 i
NE - Not evaluated due to lack of dose and/or CTV.
a — Soil concentration below background level.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zlrod29.wk3
A-51
                                                                                 18-Jul-9<

-------
                                                                            Table 30

                                                     Summary of Detailed Alternatives Evaluation"
                                                                   Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Remedial Alternative
MM-1 No action.
MM-2 Limited action/institutional controk/Groundwater
Management Zone (OMZ). Includes monitoring of
groundwatcr in Zone 1 to track potential phunc
initiation.
MM-3 Groundwaler Extraction and On-base Treatment and
Disposal (UV Oxidation Technology with Carbon
Adsorption).
Shon-Term
Bffeclivenest
Ranking
AB
AB
B
Long-Term
Birectiveness
Ranking
BC
AB
A
Reduction in
TMV Through
Treatment
Ranking
C
C
AB
Impkmenlabilily
Ranking
AB
B
B
Protection of
Human Health
and
Environment
Ranking
C
A
A
Compliance
with
ARARs
Ranking
C
AB
AB
Cost Analysis*
(in $1,000)
Not estimated
$2,034.
$7.804.
* The ktter ranking system is defined as follows:
        A >  The alternative meelt the intent of the criterion.
        B -  The alternative partially meets the intent of the criterion.
        C -  The alternative does not meet the intent of the criterion.
        AB -  The alternative was ranked between A and B.
        BC -  The alternative was ranked between B and C.
b Estimated costs represent the 30-year present worth cost.
  MKOI\RPT:00628026.004\zone Irod apa
A-52
07/14/95

-------
                                                                      Table 31

                   Documentation of ARARs for Groundwater Management of Migration  — Alternative MM-2
   Limited Action/Natural Attenuation and Biodegradation of Contaminated Groundwater/Institutional  Controls/GMZ
                                                             Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
     Media
                           Requirement
        Requirement Synopsis
     Action to be Taken to Attain
           Requirements
                                                                                                                                        Basts
                 Chemk»l-Sp«clflt
 Groundwater
                 FBDERAL-SDWA-Maximum
                 Contaminant Levels (MCLs)
                 (40 CFR 141.11-141.16)
MCLs have been promulgated for a
number of common organic and inorganic
contaminants. These levels regulate the
contaminants in public drinking water
supplies, but may also be considered
relevant and appropriate for groundwaler
aquifers potentially used for drinking
water.
Primary MCLs have been set as the
cleanup goals when the primary MCL was
available.  See Section VII for
groundwater cleanup goals. Deed
restrictions will protect public health by
prohibiting use of contaminated
groundwater. Source removal, as set
forth in the LP-S Source Removal ROD,
and natural attenuation will be relied
upon to achieve cleanup goals.  GMZ
monitoring will be performed to confirm
compliance with cleanup goals.  It is
estimated that cleanup goals will be
attained within approximately 11 years
under this alternative.
Applicable
  Groundwater
                  FEDERAL-SDWA-Maximum
                  Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs)
                  (40 CFR 141.50-141.51)
MCLGs are nonenforceable health-based
goals for public water systems. MCLGs
are set at levels that would result in no
known or anticipated adverse health
effects with an adequate margin of safely.
Non-zero MCLGs were considered when
selecting cleanup goals. See Section VII
for groundwater cleanup goals.  Deed
restrictions will protect public health by
prohibiting use of contaminated
groundwater. Source removal, as set
forth in the LF-5 Source Removal ROD,
and natural attenuation will be relied
upon to achieve cleanup goals.  GMZ
monitoring will be performed to confirm
compliance with cleanup goals.  It is
estimated that cleanup goals will be
attained within approximately 11 years
under this alternative.
Relevant and Appropriate
MK01\RFr:(K)628026004\zonclrodapa
                      A-53
                                                                                               07/14/95

-------
                                                                     Table 31

                  Documentation of ARARs for Groundwater Management of Migration — Alternative MM-2
   Limited Action/Natural Attenuation and Btodegradatkm of Contaminated Groundwater/InstUutional Controls/GMZ
                                                            Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                                   (Continued)
     Media
          Requirement
                                                           Requirement Synopsis
                                           Action to be Taken to Attain
                                                 Requirements
                                                                                                                                       Basis
 Groundwater
STATE NH Admin Code Env-Ws
410.05, Ambient Growtdwater
Quality Standard! and Criteria
Standards for quality of ambient
groundwaler.
                                                                                        Availabk MCLs, MCLGs, and other
                                                                                        heaHh-based limits have been used as
                                                                                        appropriate to set cleanup levels.  See
                                                                                        Section VII for froundwater cleanup
                                                                                        goals.  Deed restrictions will protect
                                                                                        public health by prohibiting use of
                                                                                        contaminated groundwater.  Source
                                                                                        removal, as set forth in the LF-5 Source
                                                                                        Removal ROD, and natural attenuation
                                                                                        will be relied upon to achieve cleanup
                                                                                        foals.  GMZ monitoring will be
                                                                                        performed to confirm compliance with
                                                                                        cleanup goals.  It is estimated that
                                                                                        cleanup foals will be attained within
                                                                                        approximately 11 yean under this
                                                                                        alternative.
Applicable
  Ciroundwater
                 STATE-New Hampshire Primary
                 Drinking Water Criteria (MCU and
                 MCLGs) under RSA Ch. 485,
                 Promulgated as Env-Ws 316, 317, and
                 318
                                  Standards for public drinking water
                                  systems.  Used as ckanup standards for
                                  aquifers and surface water bodies that are
                                  potential drinking water sources.
                                      Availabk MCU, MCl.Gs. and
                                      other health-based limits have been
                                      used as appropriate to set ckanup
                                      kvels. See Section VII for groundwater
                                      cleanup goals. Deed restrictions will
                                      protect public health by prohibiting use of
                                      contaminated groundwaler.  Source
                                      removal, as set forth in the I.F-5 Source
                                      Removal ROD, and natural attenuation
                                      win be relied upon to achieve cleanup
                                      goals. GMZ monitoring will be
                                      performed to confirm compliance with
                                      ckanup goals. It is estimated that
                                      ckanup goals will be attained within
                                      apprunimalely II years under this
                                      alternative.
Rckvant and Appropriate,
to the extent these limits
are more stringent than
federal MCU and MCLGs.
MKOI\RIT:00628026 004\zone 1 rod apa
                                                       A-54
                                                                                                                               07/14/95

-------
                                                   Table 31
              Documentation of ARARs for Groundwater Management of Migration — Alternative MM-2
  Limited Action/natural Attenuation and Biodegradation of Contaminated Groundwater/Institutional Controls/GMZ
                                             Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                  (Continued)
Media
Oroundwaler
Groundwater
Hazardous
Waste
Requirement
Locntlon-SDMiflc
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
410.18 State of New Hampshire
Oroundwaler Protection Rules
Aetlon-Soeclflc
STATR-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
410.26, Slate of New Hampshire
Groundwater Protection Rules
FEDERAL-RCRA, Subtitle C.
40 CFR Part 264, Hazardous Waste
Regulations
Requirement Synopsis
For sites with contaminated groundwater
or unlined landfills, requires delineation of
a Groundwater Management Zone (GMZ)
based on hydrogeologic data.
Groundwater quality within a GMZ shall
not be degraded outside the GMZ, GMZ
boundaries must be clearly marked by
physical features (such as reproducible
survey markers, trsvis rods, or monitor
well rods) or property lines. Extraction of
groundwater from wells within the GMZ
must be restricted by easements, and an
alternative water supply must be provided
for wells within the GMZ that are in
service.
RCRA Subtitle C establishes standards
applicable to treatment, storage, transport,
and disposal of hazardous waste, and to
closure of hazardous waste facilities.
Action to be Taken to Attain
Requirements
A GMZ will be established in accordance
with this rule.
Land use restrictions will prevent the use
of contaminated groundwater from within
the GMZ. Source control, as set forth in
the LF-S Source Control ROD, and
natural attenuation will be relied upon to
restore groundwater quality, and it is
estimated that compliance will be attained
in 11 years. Groundwaler monitoring will
be conducted at the boundaries of the
GMZ to ensure that compliance is
attained.
Management of hazardous waste as part
of a CBRCLA response must comply with
substantive Subtitle C regulations.
Basis
Applicable
Applicable
Relevant and Appropriate.
Has effect through state
hazardous waste
requirements that operate
in lieu of direct federal
regulation. See discussion
of these requirements
below.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonclrod.apa
A-55
                                                     07/14/95

-------
                                                   Table 31
             Documentation of ARARs for Groundwater Management of Migration — Alternative MM-2
  Limited Action/Natural Attenuation and Btodegradatkm of Contaminated Groundwater/Iastitutlonal Controls/GMZ
                                            Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                  (Continued)
Media
_!_..«
Waste

Hazardous
Wacfle


Hazardous
Waste
Hazardous
Waste
_t™
Waste
Groundwater
Requirement
PpnRRAI.RntA JO PPR 264 90.
264.101 (Subpart F), Release* from
Cfjui Wads* Ihf nsiBs«*>isit*s»i 1 latili

STATB-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm

Hazardous Waste Facilities
STATE-RSA Ch 147-A. New
Hampshire Hazardous Waste
Management Act and Hazardous
Waste Rules, Env-Wm Chapter 100-
1000. Specific requirements discussed
below.
STATB-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
702.11, Groundwater Monitoring
CTATR_NH Admin rtale Pjtv-Wm
702.12, Other Monitoring
STATB-NH Admin. Code Env-We
604, Abandonment of Wells
Requirement Synopsis

ensure that groundwaler standards are
Ko^sircmcflits: for (rouadwater monitoring,
and. if accessary, corrective action at
hazardous waste facilities.
Identifies procedures to be followed to

requirements for groundwaler monitoring,
and, if necessary, corrective action at
hazardous waste facilities.
Standards for management of hazardous
waste and closure of hazardous waste
facilities. Operates in Iku of federal
RCRA Subtitle C requirements and, as
such, the substantive standards of these
rules must be complied with in the
management of hazardous waste as part of
a CERCLA response.
Specifies the types of hazardous waste
treatment facilities that must monitor
migration of hazardous waste as specified.
_-fc«. • • K»
certain types of facilities.
Imposes requirements for closure of wells.
Action to be Taken to Attain
Requirements

Source Area ROD, will be relied upon to
achieved in an estimated 11 yean under
this alternative.
GMZ monitoring will be conducted in


Applicable requirements will be satisfied.
See discussion of specific provisions
below.
GMZ monitoring will be conducted In
compliance with these requirements.

compliance with any applicable
requirements.
If any groundwaler welb will be
abandoned, these well closure
requirements will be satisfied.
Basis
Rele ri


Relevant and Appropriate


See analysis of specific
provisions below.
Relevant and Appropriate


Applicable
MK01\RrT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apa
A-56
                                                     07/14/95

-------
                                                   Table 31
              Documentation of ARARs for Groundwater Management of Migration — Alternative MM-2
  Limited Action/Natural Attenuation and Biodegradation of Contaminated Groundwater/Institutional Controls/GMZ
                                             Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
                                                  (Continued)
Media
Groundwater
Groundwalcr
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Requirement
STTATE-NH Admin. Code Bnv-Ws
410.03. Groundwater Quality Criteria
STATE-NH Admin. Code Bnv-Ws
410.20, Notification to Landowners
STATE-NH Admin. Code Bnv-Ws
410.21, Recoidation
STATB-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws
410.27, Groundwater Management
Permit Compliance Criteria
STATB-NH Admin. Code Bnv-Ws
410.30, Water Quality Sampling,
. Analysis, and Reporting.
Requirement Synopsis
Compliance with Env-Ws 410.03 requires
action to ensure that groundwater is
suitable for drinking water, does not
violate Ambient Groundwater Quality
Standards, and does not cause surface
water quality violations (unless as a result
of natural conditions or e«empt under
Env-Ws 410.04).
Requires the permittee to provide notice
of the permit to all owners of lots of
records within the GMZ within 30 days of
the date of approval of the groundwater
management permit.
Regulates recordation of notice of the
groundwater management permit in the
registry of deeds in the chain of title for
each lot within the GMZ.
Specific action to be taken in case of
violation of an Ambient Groundwater
Quality Standard at or outside the GMZ
boundary.
' Specifies the requirements for monitoring
groundwater quality to ensure compliance
with the terms of the permit and
groundwater protection rules.
Action to be Taken to Attain
Requirements
Remedial action will be conducted in
accordance with the requirements.
Action will be taken in accordance with
this requirement.
Remedial action will be conducted in
accordance with the requirement.
Remedial action will be conducted in
accordance with the requirement.
Remedial action will be conducted in
accordance with these regulations.
Basis
Applicable
Substantive requirements
are applicable
Substantive requirements
are applicable
Substantive requirements
are applicable
Substantive requirements
are applicable
M K01\KIT:00628026.004\zone 1 rod.apa
                                                      A-57
07/14/95

-------
                               APPENDIX B




                     DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE
MK01\RFT.00628026.004\zonelnxLsa                                               07/19/95

-------
                                     State of New Hampshire
                        DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
                            6 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, Concord. NH 03302-0095
       NHDES               603-271-3503    FAX 603-271-2867
                                    TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
                                        April 13, 1995
       Mr. Alan K. Olsen
       Director, Air Force Base Conversion Agency
       1700 North Moore Street, Suite 2300
       Arlington, VA 22209-2802

       Re:   Record of Decision for Zone 1 at the Pease Air Force Base Superfund Site;
             Newington and Portsmouth,  New Hampshire

       Sub]: Declaration of Concurrence

       Dear Mr. Olsen:

             The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (Department) has
       reviewed the "Record of Decision for Zone 1" (Zone 1 ROD) for the Pease Air Force Base
       Superfund Site in Newington and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The Air Force prepared
       the Zone 1 ROD in accordance with the provisions of the Comprehensive  Environmental
       Response, Compensation, and Liability  Act of 1980 as amended by the Superfund
       Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (CERCLA). The Zone 1 ROD documents
       the actions to be taken to remedy potential threats to human health, welfare  and the
       environment resulting from releases, or threatened release, of hazardous substances at
       the Pease AFB sites collectively known as Zone 1. As a party to the "Pease  Federal
       Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120" (Pease FFA), the State has participated
       in the oversight of the Air Force's Zone 1 Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies
       The State also has  provide the Air Force with updated lists of all the potential State
       Applicable and Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) during the remedial
       planning and remedy selection processes.

             Modification #1 to the Pease  FFA (March 1993) established Zone 1  to be the
       geographic grouping of sites  (mostly landfills and ditches separated by forests and
       wetlands), located entirely within the Town of Newington, New Hampshire.  The original
       Pease FFA (April 1991) designated Landfills 2, 3,4,5, and the Bulk Fuel Storage Area
       (Sites 2,3,4,5, and 13) to be Areas of Concern (AOCs) which required investigations and
       evaluations under Superfund. Additional evaluations of Pauls Brook and Flagstone Brook
       (Sites 23 and 26) were required to determine if they should become AOCs. In the Pease
       FFA Modification #1 the Paint Can Disposal Area (Site 44) was added to the Pease FFA
       as an AOC and the Railroad Track Herbicide Area (Site 46) was added as a site requiring
       additional evaluation to determine if  this  area should be an AOC. Also, the Bulk Fuel
       Storage Area was removed from the jurisdiction of CERCLA (since the contaminants at the
       site are petroleum-related and exempt from CERCLA) and placed under the jurisdiction of
       the applicable State statutes.

AIR RESOURCES DIV.      WASTE MANAGEMENT DIV.      WATER RESOURCES D[V.      WATER SUPPLY & POLLUTION CONTROL DIV.
64 No. Main Street          6 Hazen Drive                64 No. Main Street             P.O. Box 95
Caller Box 2033           Concord. N.H. 03301             P.O. Box 2008              Concord. N.H. 03302-0095
Concord. N.H. 03302-2033      Tel. 603-271-2900              Concord. N.H. 03302-2008        Tel. 603-271-3503
Tel. 603-271-1370           Fax 603-271-2456              Tel. 603-271-3406             Fax 603-271-2181
Fax 603-271-1381                                  Fax 603-271-1381

-------
 Letter to Alan K. Ol*«n
 Re: Zone 1 ROD Declaration of Concurrence
 April 13,1995
 Page 2
       In a letter dated September 16,1993, the State concurred with the Source Area
ROD for Landfill 5 which was fast-tracked in order to accelerate the implementation of the
actions necessary to contain the primary source of groundwater contamination in Zone 1.
The State also concurred with the decision to incorporate Pauls Brook and Flagstone
Brook into a basewide surface water operable unit (intended to ensure the potential threats
to human health and the environment are thoroughly investigated) and with the no further
action  decisions for Landfill 3 and the Railroad Tracks Herbicide Area.

Consistency with State Remediation Policy and Rules

       In accordance with the requirements of CERCLA, the Zone 1 ROD documents the
analyses  of facts which support the selection  of the environmental response action
necessary to protect human health and environment due to the potential threats posed by
contaminants at Landfill 2, Landfill 4, the Paint Can Disposal Area, and contaminated
groundwater in Zone 1.  While no further action under CERCLA is planned for Landfill 2,
Landfill 4 and the Paint Can Disposal Area, these sites are to be closed in accordance with
the Department's Solid Waste Rules, in a manner that is consistent with how similar sites
are addressed in the State of New Hampshire. The closure of these solid waste sites, the
Bulk Fuel Storage Area and the source control actions at Landfill 5 will collectively address
the sources of groundwater contamination in Zone 1.

      The selected remedy for contaminated  groundwater in  Zone 1  includes the
establishment of a Groundwater Management  Zone (GMZ) in accordance with New
Hampshire's Groundwater Protection Rules. The Zone 1 GMZ is the contained volume of
contaminated, or potentially contaminated, groundwater that will be restored to the State's
ambient groundwater quality standards through passive (natural) processes. While the
State has previously  expressed a  concern  that some sections of its Groundwater
Protection Rules were not selected as ARARs in the Zone 1  ROD, consultation with EPA-
New England indicates that the substantive issues of concern will be addressed utilizing
EPA guidelines through the authority provided by CERCLA.

       Groundwater use within the GMZ may be restricted through institutional controls
while groundwater quality is restored. A notice of the GMZ must be recorded in the
registry of deeds in the chain of title for each lot within the GMZ.  Although not required
by CERCLA, the Department will issue a Groundwater Management Permit in order to
track water quality monitoring on a site specific basis. A comprehensive detailed review
of all environmental monitoring data will be conducted by the Air Force, EPA-New England,
and the State to ensure the remedial action provides adequate protection of human health
and the environment and complies with applicable regulations.

-------
Letter to Alan K. Olsen
Re: Zone 1 ROD Declaration of Concurrence
April 13,1995
Page3
State Concurrence

      The State reviewed all information in the Zone 1 Administrative Record, evaluated
the cumulative risks  associated with current and future potential exposures to the
contaminants at the sites addressed by the Zone 1 ROD, and determined the actions set
forth in the Zone 1 ROD are consistent with the requirements of CERCLA. As a party to
the Pease FFA, and acting as agent for the State  of New Hampshire, the Department
concurs with the no-action decisions selected under CERCLA for Sites 2,  4 and 44 and the
selected remedy for the management of contaminated groundwater in Zone 1 within a
Groundwater Management Zone.

      In striving  to  achieve  the maximum benefit with limited public  (and private)
resources, the State continues to seek reasonable and practical solutions to the often
costly and complex environmental challenges associated with contaminated site cleanups.
Through the partnership and dedication exhibited by  all parties, the rapid implementation
of the actions necessary to protect human health and the environment will serve to
expedite the achievement of our mutual environmental goals and facilitate efforts to restore
the local economy in order to protect the welfare of those in the communities surrounding
Pease AFB.  As always, the Department stands ready to provide the guidance and
assistance the  Air Force may require in order to take the actions necessary to protect
human health and the environment in a complete and cost-effective manner.
                                          Sincerely,
                                          Robert W. Varney
                                          Commissioner
cc:    Philip J. O'Brien, Ph.D., Director. DES-WMD
      Cart W. Baxter, P.E., DES-WMEB
      Richard H. Pease, P.E., DES-WMEB
      Martha A. Moore, Esq., NHDOJ-AGO
      Michael J. Daly, EPA
      Arthur L Ditto. P.E., AFBCA
      James Snyder, USAF

-------
                                 APPENDIX C




                         RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
MK01\RFT:00628026.0M\zonelrcxJ.sa                                                   07/14/95

-------
                                  APPENDIX C
                          RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY

 OVERVIEW

 The Air Force issued the Zone 1 Proposed Plan to the public in July 1994. In the Zone 1
 Proposed Plan the Air Force identified its preferred alternatives and disposition for the
 various sites contained within the boundaries of Zone 1. Zone 1 consists of the following
 sites and operable units: Sites 2, 3, 4,5, 13, 23, 26, 44, and 46 and a groundwater operable
 unit. Additionally, the Air Force explained in the Zone 1 Proposed Plan that the ditch sites
 (Flagstone Brook, the Railway Ditch, and Pauls Brook) and the Bulk Fuel Storage Area
 (Site 13) were not included as part of the Zone 1 Proposed Plan alternatives. It was further
 explained that these sites would be addressed  either under a separate document, as an
 addition to a remedial action, or under another environmental program. The selection of
 the Air Force's preferred alternatives was coordinated with EPA Region I and NHDES
 prior to being presented to the general public in the Zone  1 Proposed Plan.

 BACKGROUND OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

 Prior to commencement of the public comment period, the Air Force issued a fact sheet
 that summarized the contents of the Zone 1 Proposed Plan.  Presentations on the status of
 work being conducted and the results of the  work in the Zone 1 area were made to the
 Pease AFB Technical Review Committee (TRC). Additionally, the content of the Zone 1
 Proposed  Plan  was  presented to and  discussed with  the members  of  the  TRC.
 Announcements were mailed to all individuals on the Pease AFB mailing list in July 1994
 prior  to the beginning of the public comment  period.   Newspaper  announcements
 (advertisements) were published prior to the public hearing date of 18 August 1994.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apc               C-l                                 07/14/95

-------
 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
 AND AIR FORCE RESPONSES
 During the public comment period for the Zone 1 Proposed Plan, no written comments
 were received, and verbal comments were made by three individuals at the Zone 1 Proposed
 Plan public hearing held on 18 August 1994 at the Newington Town Hall.  The comments
 received and associated Air Force response to those comments follow:
 1.  Comment (verbal):
    Response:

2.  Comment (verbal):
   Response:
This project on Zone 1,1 thoroughly support.  I've presented
this to my board, and they concurred with the ideas of what the
Air Force is doing on the cleanup.

The Air Force acknowledges the commentor's support.

Now I'm getting to the big question, and the question is cost
and what the  Air Force is doing with  hiring  a remediation
coordinator (contractor) and the cost, the cost of $150 million.

The Air  Force, as a matter of policy, has decided to hire a
single  contractor for  each  closing base  to  be used  for
implementation of the various remedial actions selected for that
specific base.  For Pease AFB, this basewide remedial action
contract has a maximum ceiling of $150 million.  Each work
order issued to the contractor  will be individually priced, and
the Air Force will monitor the contractor's performance to
ensure that  the work is done in accordance with contract
requirements and in a cost-efficient manner.  It is not expected
that the full capacity ($150 million) of this basewide remedial
action  contract will have to  be used  to complete  all the
necessary remedial action activities at Pease AFB.
MKn\RJT:006MB6.004\xooelrodjpc
              C-2
07/14/95

-------
 3.  Comment (verbal):
 In general SCOPE, at our last meeting we discussed -- which
 was the 2nd of August - we discussed the Zone 1 Proposed
 Plan and were in general agreement that the Proposed Plan is
 the right way to go and that we do support the Air Force's
 actions in the Remedial Action.
    Response:
 The  Air  Force acknowledges SCOPE'S agreement with the
 proposed Zone 1 actions.
 4.  Comment (verbal):
 I  did have  a question, but I think you answered it.  In the
 railroad bed itself, I was concerned that the investigation should
. have gone from the border (base) all the way up to, I think it's
 Dover Avenue, at the old BX, because that's where the railroad
 bed ended.  And along in there herbicides were probably used.
    Response:
 The railroad track herbicide usage area (Site 46) covers the
 total length of the railway bed, from the base boundary to the
 end point within the base. This site was put into Zone 1 for
 convenience because Zone 1 is where the railroad tracks begin
 on the base. The investigative work on the railroad track area
 covers the total length.  Additionally, work in Zone 3 and at
 Site 32/36 also  covered some of the  railroad  bed  areas,
 especially at the end point identified by the commentor.
5. Comment (verbal):
I've got one question you might answer later oh or now, it
doesn't matter.  We looked at the construction of Landfill 5 and
commented previously that the PDA, if they were going to build
a road to  the north ramp, because it is prime industrial area,
that it should be, the preliminary work should be done as the
construction of Landfill 5 was being done so that we don't have
to come back later on and redo everything.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apc
              C-3
07/14/95

-------
   Response:
 The Air Force did take into account the future possibility of the
 PDA constructing an access road to the north ramp area when
 we designed the remedial action for Landfill (LF-5). The Air
 Force was able  to adjust the toes (edges) of the landfill to
 facilitate  the future road.  This action did  not  cost the Air
 Force any additional money.   As a  result, a road can be
 constructed without having to do any modification to the final
 LF-5 cap.
6.  Comment (verbal):
 Speaking of costs, we did address this at our August meeting,
 the  cost of  the  projects,  and  our technical advisor  was
 concerned of the cost of some of the projects, especially the
 waste water treatment plants here (Landfill 5) and out at Site
 8. And we've really got, as taxpayers, we've got to watch and
 monitor  the costs.
   Response:
The Air Force also is concerned about the cost of remedial
actions that are being or will be implemented at Pease AFB.
Along with watching costs, the Air Force must ensure that the
remedial  action being  purchased  will  meet  the  cleanup
requirements. This is a balancing process, and sometimes it is
necessary to take a conservative approach to minimize the
potential risk of failure of a treatment system.   The  water
treatment plant purchased for the LF-5 work was necessary as
a contingency in the event that water encountered during the
excavation process  required treatment.  The  Air Force will
reuse this plant to support the Landfill 6 work, and also is
considering using it at several underground storage tank sites at
Pease AFB. These types of actions by the Air Force will result
in an overall savings to the federal taxpayer.  The  Air Force
                                       C-4
                                                    07/14/95

-------
                          welcomes the continued oversight by the public and SCOPE on
                          cost-management issues.
 7.  Comment (verbal):
 So I hope that, with the money that's already been appropriated
 for Pease and earmarked for Pease, that we put it to the best
 use, we don't spend a lot of money on redundancy that we may
 not need, on things that the state would like to see, things that
 the EPA would like to see, but we cannot afford.
    Response:
 The Air Force concurs with this statement.  The Air Force
 cannot afford, nor is it in the federal taxpayer's interest, to
 spend money on work or items that are not beneficial to the
 cleanup process at Pease AFB.  Cost benefit  analysis is an
 appropriate topic for the Pease Restoration Advisory Board to
 put to the Air Force and regulators as an item it considers
 should be taken into account when determining the need for
 additional expenditures.
8.  Comment (verbal):
I just want to say that as a resident of Newington, I feel very
comfortable with the Air Force's approach on Zone 1.  The
presentation that was made was very thorough tonight.  It gave
me good confidence that the Air Force is treating this problem
in a very cost-effective way and coming up with the best
solution that we can with the funds available.
   Response:
9. Comment (verbal):
The Air Force appreciates the confidence this commentor has
in the Air Force's ability to properly address the Zone 1 issues.

I do have one question. My understanding from your briefing
was that  the opportunity for redevelopment of the Landfill 5
site would be somewhat in, in five years -- excuse me, eleven
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apc
              C-5
07/14/95

-------
                           years. If a particular company chose to, would like to develop
                           that earlier, is it feasible that, in your estimation, that  they
                           could, if they could find a site to transport  the contents  of
                           Landfill 5  to, that they could do that, and do you have any
                           estimate of what the cost of that would be?

    Response:             The 11 years is the estimated time it will take the groundwater
                           to cleanse  itself (naturally attenuate).  After that pehod, the
                           groundwater under LF-5 would be clean, but the waste would
                           still be there. It would be possible in the future for a developer
                           to propose  to excavate and remove the waste material from
                           LF-5 and relocate it to another regulatory-acceptable location.
                           Obviously, this type of action would have to comply and satisfy
                           all  regulations that may govern such  an action.  Based on
                           today's regulations, it would cost many millions of dollars to do
                           this.  For  instance,  Alternative  SB evaluated  in the LF-5
                           Feasibility Study involved off-site disposal of the landfill waste.
                           The off-site waste disposal cost associated with this alternative
                           was in excess of $150 million.
MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zooelro
-------
                                APPENDIX D




                     ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
MKOJ\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod^a                                                 07/14/95

-------
            ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX
                         FOR THE
           INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM
                  PEASE AIR FORCE BASE
                     NEW HAMPSHIRE
                        JULY 1995
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\ronelrod.ap
-------
                   ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE

       The administrative record file is a collection of documents which form the basis for the
 selection of a response action at a Superfund site.  Under section 113(k) of the Comprehensive
 Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the U.S.  Air Force is
 required to establish an administrative record file for every Superfund response action and to
 make a copy of the administrative record available at or near the site.

       The administrative record file must be reasonably  available for public review during
 normal business hours.   The  record file  should be treated as  a non-circulating reference
 document.  This will allow the public greater access to the volumes and also minimize the risk
 of loss or damage.  Individuals may photocopy any documents in the non-confidential portion
 of the file, according to the photocopying procedures at the local repository.

       The documents in the administrative record file may become lost or damaged during use.
 If this occurs, contact the administrative record file manager at Pease AFB.  Documents may
 be added to the administrative record file as site work progresses.  This index will be updated
 as documents are added to the administrative record file.

       The administrative  record  file will be  maintained in Building  43 at Pease AFB.
 Questions and/or comments about the administrative record file should be directed to:

                        Arthur L. Ditto, Remedial Project Manager
                           Air Force Base Conversion Agency
                           Operating Location A, Building 43
                                 61 International Drive
                              Pease AFB, NH  03803-0157
                                    (603) 430-2586
Dynamic Corporation f'"f~1 in the organization, etublithment and on-tite setup of the Administrative Record File at Peaae Air Force Bate.
MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxUpd                D-l                                    07/14/95

-------
                    ABOUT THE INDEX NUMBERING SYSTEM
 Document Number -
      Comprised of a 3 letter site code (PEA), the category number, the
      entry number and the page  range  of a  document. (Both page
      numbers will be the same for a one page document.) If documents
      are eventually placed on a  microfiche  system, the  document
      number consists of the site code followed by the microfilm reel
      and frame number.
                                Example:  PEA (1.1) #1 001-031
 Site Code

 PEA
(Category
(1.1)
Entry »

#1
Page Range

001-031
Long Title

Author



Recipient

Date

Type

Second Reference

Location
             The long title and brief description of document.

             Indicates author or primary originator of document. If a
             contractor prepared the document, indicates company and
             location.

             Indicates primary recipient of document.

             Indicates date document was issued.

             Indicates document type

             Other categories pertaining to the document.

             Exact location(s) of document.
MK01\RFT:00628026.00«\ionelio
-------
                    ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ĄD-V- STRTirTi;mE

 1.0   SITE BOENTIFICATION
      1.1         Background - RCRA and other Information
      1.2         Notification/Site Inspection Reports
      1.3         Preliminary Assessment (PA) Report
      1.4         Site Investigation (SI) Report
      1.5         Previous Operable Unit Information
      1.6         Correspondence

 2.0   REMOVAL RESPONSES
      2.1         Sampling and Analysis Plans
      2.2         Sampling and Analysis Data / Chain of Custody
      2.3         EE/CA Approval Memorandum (Non-Time-Critical Removals)
      2.4         EE/CA (Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis)
      2.5         Action Memorandum
      2.6         Amendments to Action Memorandum
      2.7         Removal Response Reports
      2.8         Correspondence

 3.0   REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI)
      3.1         Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)
      3.2         Sampling and Analysis Data/Chain of Custody Forms
      3.3         Work Plan
      3.4         Preliminary RI Field Work Reports
      3.5         Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports
      3.6         Correspondence

4.0   FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS)
      4.1         ARAR Determinations
      4.2         Feasibility Reports
      4.3         Proposed Plan
      4.4         Supplements and Revisions to the Proposed Plan
      4.5         Correspondence

5.0   RECORD OF DECISION (ROD)
      5.1         ROD
      5.2         Amendments to ROD
      5.3         Explanations of Significant Differences
      5.4         Correspondence
   MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelreNlJpd              D-3                                07/14/95

-------
 6.0   STATE AND FEDERAL COORDINATION
      6.1         Cooperative Agreements/SMOAs
      6.2         Federal Facility Agreement (FFA)
      6.3         Coordination - State/Federal
      6.4         General Correspondence

 7.0   ENFORCEMENT
      7.1         Enforcement History
      7.2         Endangerment Assessments
      7.3         Administrative Orders
      7.4         Consent Decrees
      7.5         Affidavits
      7.6         Documentation of Technical Discussions/Response Actions
      7.7         Notice Letters and Responses

 8.0   HEALTH ASSESSMENTS
      8. 1         ATSDR Health Assessments
      8.2         Toxicological Profiles
      8.3         General Correspondence

 9.0   NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
      9.1         Notices Issued
      9.2         Findings of Fact
      9.3         Reports
      9.4         General Correspondence

 10.0  PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
      10.1         Comments and Responses
      10.2         Community Relations Plan
      10.3         Public   Notice(s)   (Availability  of   the   Admin.   Record   File,
                  Availability of the Proposed Plan, Public Meetings)
      10.4         Public Meeting Transcripts
      10.5         Documentation of other Public Meetings
      10.6         Fact Sheets, Press Advisories, and News Releases
      10.7         Responsiveness Summary
      10.8
      10.9         Technical Review Committee Charter
      10.10        Correspondence

11.0   TECHNICAL SOURCES, GUIDANCE, AND PROCEDURES DOCUMENTS
      11.1         FPA
      11.2         EPA Regional Guidance


   MKDl\RPT:00«8026.004\iooelio
-------
       11.3         State Guidance
       11.4         Air Force Guidance
       11.5         Technical Sources
       11.6         Proposed Procedures/Procedures
       11.7         Correspondence

12.0 CONFIDENTIAL FILE
       12.1         Privileged Documents (Extractions)
   MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelroiapd                D-5                                    07/14/95

-------
                                      1.1
                            • RCRA s*d Other
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (1.1)11001-031
 'Scop* of Work for the Remedial mveetigation/Feaaibility Study'
 Pease Air Force Base
 EPA, NHDES
 April 1991
 Scop* of Work for RI/FS
 None
 ARF, »
                                         U  N*tJ&*MaVSsteIwpectio> Reports

 'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                                                              (PA) Report
 PEA (1.3) ft 001-068
 •Phu* D Problem Confirmation tad Quantification Presurvey Report (FMld Sampling for SI Work)*
 Roy F. Wetton. be.
 EPA, NHDES, USAF Occupation! and Environmental Health Lib (OEHL), Brooks AFB, TX
 Jun.1984
 Technical Report
 NOD.
         ARF, R
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONO TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (1.3) 12 001-182
 •Installation Restoration Program Records Search*
 CH2MHU1
 EPA; NHDES; USAF Engineering & Services Center, Tyndall AFB; SAC, Offutt AFB, NE
 January 19S4
 Technical Report
 None
 ARF, IR
                                f
PEA (1.3) n 001-041
Roy F. Wenoo, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
20 Jury 1990
Letter Report
Nona
ARF, IR
                   - Updated PA Report*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (1.4) #1001-309
                                           1.4 SetcbreMicaliM (9) Report
                  i Program, Fhaea II - Coafirmatioa/QiuaificMioa Stage I, Volume I (Final Report for Period
October 1984-July 1986)'
Roy F. Weeton, lac.
HQ SAC/SOPB, Oflutt AFB, NE; EPA; NHDES
August 1986
Technical Report: Field Investigations
None
ARF, Dt
                               *
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\tonelnxLapd
                              D-7
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (1.4) #2 001-883
 'Installation Ratontion Prognm, Phase n - Confirmation/Quantification Stage 1 , Volume U (Appendices)'
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 HQ SAC/SGPB, Offutt AFB, ME; EPA; NHDES
 August 1987
 Technical Report:  Field Inveaigationi
 None
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (1.4)13 001-308
 •Installation Restoration Prognm, Stage 3B Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection*
. Roy F. Western, lac.
 EPA; NHDES; HQ SAC/DE, Oflutt AFB, NE; AFSC HSD/YAQ, Brooks AFB, TX
 February 1991
 Technical Report: Also includes review of PA
 None
 ARF, R
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
.AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (1.4) #6001-817
 Pease AFB Railroad Tracks (Site 46) Site Investigation Letter Report
 Weston
 USAF
 24 September 1992
 Letter Report
 PEA (1.6)
 ARF, IR
                                          IS  Pretinus Operable Unit Information

• NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                          1.6 Correspondence

 PEA (1.6) #10014)02
 'Comments Regarding the Installation Restoration Program, Phase I Record Sesrch Report, Pease Air Force Base*
 The State of New Hampshire, Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission
 HQ SAC, Offim AFB, NE
 16 March 1984
 None
 ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (1.6) fi 001404
 'Comments Regarding the Installation Restoration Program Report (09/10/86)*
 State of New Hampshire, Division of Public Health Services
 NH Division of Public Health Services
 24 November 1986
 Commend to SI (1.4)
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (1.6) » 001-005
•Comments Regarding the Phase n. Stage 1 IRP Report (08/86 Draft)*
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
Air Force
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxLapd
                               D-8
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 3 February 1987
 Comment* to SI (1.4)
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) #4 001-007
•Aii Fore* ReepowM to Comment* From th« New H«mp*hin Department of Environmental Service* on th« Phau D,
Sttfel IRP Draft Report'
Department of A* Air Force
NHDES
SMay 19S7
RMPOOMI to CoaoMttt to SI (1.4)
None
ARF
                               I

PEA (1.6) #6 001404
•Ltutt Couema* Site Wtlkovtn m«d* wi* M«gb«n of Sbertum Cmc Group-
SttU of N«w H«q»hin, D^wnmuit of Envuonmntal ScrvioM
Ait Force
IS July 1990
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (1.6) rt 001-001
Railroad Track SI Untr Repon
USAF
lohaim* HUOMT, USEPA
Rkbard PWM, NHDES
None
ARF
   MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelRxL»pd
                             D-9
07/14/95

-------
                                          2.1 Sampling and Analysis Plans

 'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN TfflS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                   2 -2 Sampling and Analysis Data / Chain of Custody

 •NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                             2 J EE/CA Approval Memorandum (Non-Time Critical Removals)

 • NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                   2.4 EE/CA (Eafmeeriat Evaluation / Cost Analysis)

 •NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                             2.5 Action Memorandum

 'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                      2.6 Amendments to Action Memorandum

 'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                          2.7 Removal Response Reports

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (2-7) « 001-452
LONG TITLE:            "Informal Technical Information Report, Drum Removal at Site S (LF-5) - Pre-NPL Action*"
AUTHOR:                Roy F. Weoon, Inc.
RECIPIENT:              EPA, NHDES
DATE:                  December 1990
TYPE:                  Technical Report
SECOND REFERENCE:     None
LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      »


                                              2.8 Correspondence

'NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
   MKm\RPT:00628026.004\2onelrodjpd                  D-10                                         07/14/95

-------
                                          3.1
                             wd tuutjm "»» (SAF)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.1) f 1001-210
 •Quality Aiaurance Project Plan, la
        •r
                     i ReatonrJon Program, Stag* 2, to Support the Pre
 Investigation Field Work, Labelled Stag. 2 Field Wort"
 Roy F. Wtston, Inc.
 EPA; NMDES; HQ SAC/DEPV, Offiitt AFB, NE
 November 19T7
 Quality AMurance Project Plan
 Noa*
 ARF
                                f
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.1)12 001-212
 'Quality Aimrance Project Plan, Integrated Inaullation Rutoration Profram, Stag* 3"
 Roy F. WMOO, be.
 EPA, NHDES
 Au|u»tl9S9
 Quality Aaaunoc* Projwt Plan
 Nona
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.1) «3 001-216
 'huMllation Raatoratioc
Roy F. WMUMI, be.
EPA, NHDES
Jaouaiy 1991
Saopliai and Analysis Plan
Nona
ARF
Program, Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan"
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1)47 001-403
Loeaaooa of Background Sampling Locations
Arthur L. Ditto
RPM, U.S. Air Fom/PMa* AFB
lohanoaHuoMr, RPM
USEPA, Region 1
        and
Richard Peaae, RPM
NHDES
15JunalW2
UaacandMap
Stag* 3C Background Data Baae
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.1) f 110014(1
hwaUationRealontioDPr
Roy F. Weaton, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
 igram, Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3, Peaae AFB, NH - Draft
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA(3.1)»192.24-R.l
Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan. Addendum #3, QAPP Portion
Roy F. Weaton, Inc.
USAF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apd
                             D-ll
                                                           07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE.
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 2 December 1992
 Addendum
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.1)020 001-007
 Letter Report - Proposed Aquifer Tett of Well 6104
 James Soukup, George Swedberg, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 Mark McKenzie, Peue AFB
 06 January 1993
 Letter Report
 Zone 1; Site 13
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
          3.2  Sampling tad Analysis Data / Chain of Custody Forms

 PEA (3. 2) #1 001-027
 Volatile Aromatics/Halocarbons by Modified 8010/8020 - Draft Data Sheets
 Roy F. Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 Pease AFB
 Unknown
 Data
 None
 ARF
                                 *

 PEA (3 -2) « 001-018
 Volatile Aromatics/Halocarbons by Modified 8010/8020
 Roy F. Wetton, Inc.
 Pease AFB
 Unknown
 Data
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (3 2) K 001-013
Preliminary Survey of Metal Concentration* in New Hampshire Soils - Final Report
New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services, Bureau of Health Risk Assessment
USAF
May 1991
Data
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA(3.2)*7001-D1
Background Soluble Metals Concentrations for Groundwaier at Pease AFB
Roy F. Wcston, Inc.
USAF
20 November 1991
Latter Report
PEA (3.6)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (32) ft 001-E.l
Tolerance Limits for Background Soils at Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Waaton, Inc.
USAF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxtapd
                              D-12
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 17 April 1992
 LattarRaport
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.2) *10 001-002
 Raautti of Background Surfec* Water/S«dimant Location Walkovar
 Arthur L. Ditto, RFM
 U.S. Air Fona/Paaae AFB
 Johanna Huntar.RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
 19 August 1992
Knights Brook
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE.
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 .2) *H 001-052
Maximum Dattctad Coneantrations for Unfitend Groundwatar *t PMM AFB, NH
Tatk Manager
Roy F. WMMD, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, RPM
U.S. Air Forea/Pease AFB
23 August 1992
Latter with Atuchnwau (Tiblw and Gnphi)
Ouncuriutton of looiftnic B*ek|rouod Uvtli for Qroundwtwr tt PMM AFB
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.2) 111 001-007
ZOM 1 Oroundwiur Mod*! CalilMration
Roy F. WMOB, be.
USAF
17 May 1993
Zonal
ARF(SKtioo3.2BiiidaT)
                                                 3-3 WottFlM
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) *1 001-144
•Work Plan for the Imullitk
Roy F. W«Mon, IDC.
EPA.NHDES
Aufn»tl989
Work Plan
Nona
ARF
iProfram, Stag* 3"
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) n 001-028
•Installation Raatontioa Program, Stag* 3C, Aetioo Plan*
Roy F. Waaton, Inc.
EPA.NHDES
May 1991
Nona
ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodjpd
                             D-13
                                                                                                   07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .3) #4 001-258
 "InstaUation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Work Plan"
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 Itnuary 1991
 Work PUn
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (3. 3) *5 001-213
•Work PUn for me Integrated Installation Restoration Program. Stage 2, Labelled Stage 2 Work Plan*
Roy F. Wetton, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
eptember 1987
Work PUn
None
ARF, IR
                                #

PEA(3.3)*6001-GL.2
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum 1 , Peaie AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1991
Addendum
None
ARF, IR
                                9
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 .3)^7001-05
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Work PUn Addendum Number 2 for Pease AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1992
Addendum
None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) « 001-B4
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Operations Plan for Pease AFB, NH - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1991
Plan
None
ARF, IR
                                #
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) 19 001-3.5
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Work Plan Addendum 3, Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Wsjston, Inc.
USAF
June 1992
None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.3) flO ui-R2
Stage 4 Health and Safety Plan Addendum - Section 9 Paint Can Disposal Area Test Pit and Drum Handling Procedures
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxUpd
                                                     D-14
                                                                             07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                         22 June 1992
 NOM
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.3) f 12 001-004
 Groundwater Modeling PncMt Outline
 LeedePenia
 Teak Manager
 Roy F. WMUB, be.
 Artbut Ditto, RPM
 U.S. Air Fone/Peeie AFB
 2 October 1992
 Groundwater Modeling
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PBA(3.3)«3001-C.31
 batallation Renontkm Profnm, Stage 5 Hetltfa ind Safety Plan, Peaae AFB, NH - Drift
 Roy F. We«on, Inc.
 USAF
 October 1992
 Heekh and Safety Plan
 Oroundwater Modeling
 ARF, Dt
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) #14 001-036
U.S. Air Force InMallatio
                   i Rero
Roy F. Weeton, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Work Plan
LF-5
ARF,»
i Program Peaae AFB Landfill 5
Bgn Work PUn DRAFT
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.3) f 16 001-4.1
Work Plan to Evaluate the Sedimentt of Mcbcyre Brook FlagBone
Brook, Peeaa AFB, NH
Roy F. Weewn. be.
USAF
October 27,1993
Work PUn
Mebtyra Brook; FlagMone Brook
        ARF (Section 33 Binder)
                               *
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                3.4 Prebanury KI Field Work Reports

PEA (3.4) l\ 001-173
'Interim Technical Report No. 1 for the Innallition ReitontioD Program, Stage 2, Volume I*
Roy F. Weatto, be.
EPA, NHDES
Technical Repoit
None
ARF, IR
    MK01\RFr:00628026.004\zoiielro(Lapd
                            D-15
                                                                                                    07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TY?E:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) fl 001-147
 "Interim Technical Report No. 1 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume II - Appendices"
 Roy F. Weaton, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 January 1988
 Technical Report - Appendices
 None
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) #3 001-214
 "Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume I"
 Roy F. Wetton, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 August 1988
 Technical Report
 None
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) #4 001-696
 "Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume n - Appendices (Sample
 Tracking Information, Analytical Results)"
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 August 1988
 Technical Report - Appendices (Sample Tracking Information, Analytical Results)
 None
 ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) « 001-838
"Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume ID •
Results)"
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA. NHDES
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices (Analytical Results)
None
ARF, IR
                                                                            Appendices (Analytical
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) *6 001-722
•Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume IV - Appendices (Analytical
Results)"
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices (Analytical Results)
None
ARF, IR
                                  t

PEA (3.4) n 001-289
"Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume V - Appendices (Field
Geological, Oeotechnical, and Hydrogeological Data)"
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA,  NHDES
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices (Field Geological, Geotechnical, and Hydrogeological Data)
None
ARF, IR
                                  i
    MK01\RJT:0062S026.004\zonelrod.apd
                               D-16
                                                                                 07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) IS 001-106
•Interim Technical Report No. 3 for me Inatalla
Roy F. WMttM, IDC*
EPA, NHDES
February 1989
Technical Report
None
ARF, Dt
                                              i ProfTem, Sup 2, Volume P
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) #9 001-658
 'Interim Technical Report No. 3 for me loMtlUtioa Reetonbon Program, Stag* 2, Volume U - Appendices'
 Roy F. WMoa, Int.
 EPA, NHDES
 February 19«9
 Technical Report - Appeadieea
 None
 ARF, IR
                               f

 PEA (3.4) * 10 001-198
 •Interim Technical Ripoit No. 4 for the Imulbtioa R««ontion Prognm. Stt(« 2, Volume I*
 Roy F. W<«oa, Inc.
 EPA. NHDES
 April 1989
 Technical R«port
 Noo.
 ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #11 001-770
•bMrim Technical Ripon No. 4 for th* ImttlUtioo Retention Profiwn, Sag* 2, Votumt 0 - Appradicn-
Roy F. WMtta, me.
EPA, NHDES
April 1919
Twhnied R*eoft - ApptodicM
Noo*
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) #12 001-561
•mMrim Technical Rtoon No. 4 fur m* ImulUti
Roy F. WMUB, be.
EPA, NHDES
April 1919
Twfanic*] Rtpoit - Appmdicw
                                             i PtofTun, Sttf* 2, Vohim* m - Appandicn'
ARF, Dt
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.4) «3 001-770
•bMrim Technical Rtpon No. 4 for m* Inmllauoa Rwtomion Profrmm, SUf* 2, Vohraw IV - Appmdic**'
Roy F. Wettoo, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
April 1919
Tecfinictl Report - AppndicM
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.4) #14 001-1,1»
'burim T*chnk*l Rtpott No. 4 for the bualhtion Rtatomion Profnm, Slat* 2, Volume V - Appendices'
Roy F. Weetoo. Inc.
EPA, NHDES
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonclrodjpd
                                                    D-17
                                                                           07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 April 1989
 Technical Report - Appendices
 None
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) #15 001-729
 'Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Instillation Reiteration Program, Stage 2, Volume VI - Appendices'
 Roy F. Wetton, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 April 1989
. Technical Report - Appendices
 None
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) 1 16 001-803
 •Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Volume VH - Appendices'
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 April 1989
 Technical Report - Appendices
 None
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE.
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) tn 001-251
 •Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Volume I*
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 July 1990
 Technical Report
 None
 ARF, IR
                                 i

 PEA (3.4) *18 001-452
 'Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Volume II*
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 July 1990
 Technical Report
 None
 ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) «9 001-621
 'Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices, Volume I*
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 Jury 1990
 Technical Report - Appendices
 None
 ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) 120 001-420
 •Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices, Volume 0*
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 July 1990
 Technical Report - Appendices
 None
 ARF, IR
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxUpd
                              IMS
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) 121 001-658
 "Inetallafion Reettraaon Prognm, Stag* 2, Dnft Final Report, Appendicee, Vohim* ID*
 Roy F. WeMon, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 July 1990
 Technical Report - Appendicat
 NOM
 ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4)122001-688
 •Inatallation Reetontion Pr
 Roy F. WeMon, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 July 1990
 Technical Report - Appendices
 None
 ARF, IR
 >fnm, Stt|e 2, Dnft Final Repon, Appendicei, Volume IV
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) O3 001-261
 'Installation ReetontMa Pr
 Roy F. Weeton; Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 July 1990
 Technical Repon - Appendicei
 None
 ARF, IR
*nm, Stage 2, Dnft Final Report, Appendices, Volume V
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) #24 001-340
 'InMllation Reetontion Pr
Roy F. Weetoo, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendicei
None
ARF, IR
igrun, Stag* 2, Dnft Final Report, Appendicei, Summary Analytical Tablet'
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA 0.4) 125 001-007
•Oeopbyeical Survey Letter Report, Stage 3"
Roy F. Weeton, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
19 October 19*9
Letter Report
None
ARF
                               t
PEA (3-4) 132 001-331
•InMllation Reetontion Pr
Roy F. Weeteo, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
November 1990
Technical Report
None
ARF
)gnm. Stage 3, Landfill 5 She Characterization Summary*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.4) 133 001-068
"Installation Reetontion Prognm, Stage 3 Site 5 Column Leach Study Letter Report*
Roy F. Wewm. Inc.
EPA, NHDES
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxlJpd
                             D-19
                                                        07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 February 1991
 Letter Report
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.4) #38001-041
 Peue AFB Monitor Well Inventory tnd Inspection
 Roy F. Wenon, Inc.
 USAF
 7 August 1992
 Report
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)«9001-D
 Background Value* for Soil, Grouodwtter, Surface Water and Sediment at Pease Air Force Base
 Roy F. Weiton, Inc.
 USAF
 26 February 1993
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                 3.5 Remedial Investigation (81) Reports

 PEA (3.5) II 001-CS
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3 Pease AFB, NH, DIP Site 5 Column Leach Study Letter Report
 Roy F. Weiton, Inc.
 USAF
 14 February 1991
 Letter Report
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 .5)12001-0.4
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill 5 Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH Technical Report - Draft
Final
Roy F. Weiton, Inc.
USAF
April 1992
Report
LF-5
ARF
                                 t

PEA (3.5) 13 001-6.4.5
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill 5 Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH Figures - Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1992
Figure*
LF-5
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.5)#4001-F.154
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill 5 Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH Appendices A-F - Draft
Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodjpd
                              D-20
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:                  April 1992
 TYPE:                  Appenrticm
 SECOND REFERENCE:      LF-5
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                     f

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.5) I5001-M.30
 LONG TITLE:             bttllttkM RMontion Proftim, Sttfe 3C, Landfill 5 RuMdiil Invi«i|MH9i>,PMM AFB, NH AppodiewO, H. L tod
                        M - Drift Fiml
 AUTHOR:                Roy F. Wanon, Inc.
 RECIPIENT:              USAF
 DATE:                  April 1992
 TYPE:                  AppwdieM
 SECOND REFERENCE:      LF-5
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                     I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA <3.5)*6001-K
 LONOTTTLE:             iMUlUtiooRMMMMD Program, Stag*3C, Landfill 5 Remedial InvMifMion, PMM AFB, NH Appendicat I-K - Draft
                        Foal
 AUTHOR:                Roy F. Weaton, IDC.
 RECIPIENT:              USAF
 DATE:                  April 1992
 TYPE:                   AppwdieM
 SECOND REFERENCE:      LF-5
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                     I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.5) I16001-B.12
 LONG TITLE:             s.nyl.1^ Loertiodt and RMutU Dninig* Ant Litur Report
 AUTHOR:                Roy F. WMHO, Inc.
 RECIPIENT:              USAF
 DATE:                  Mty 1992
 TYPE:                   R«p«t
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Son.
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                     *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.5) «2 001-B43
 LONOTTTLE:             bMltetioBRMontiooPragnm, Sttf*4. No FunhwActionDMUKMDocuanfcr IRPSiw 3, PMW AFB, NH
 AUTHOR:               Roy F. WMUO, be.
 RECIPIENT:              USAF
 DATE:                   SglMliii 1992
 TYPE:                  DmaooDoeuoMt
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:             ARF
                                                    I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.5) *33 001-3.1.1
 LONG TITLE:            ii.iu*». ».«««i~. p^ym «t.r A  «k.rt..~«»i»«i~..«.»-».? I»PTO«.I a^.. ACT MU T^.h.^1 B^o^.
                       Dnft
 AUTHOR:               Roy F. WMM, be.
 RECIPIENT:             USAF
DATE:           .      October 1992
TYPE:                  Report
SECOND REFERENCE:     NOM
 LOCATION:             ARF
                                                    »

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.5) J34001-C
LONG TITLE:             bttllMioaRMttntioaProfnm, SU|«4, SiuCluractaizitxxiSuiaiury.IRPZoo*!, PMM AFB, NH Appmdie«A-C -
                       -Dnft
AUTHOR:               Roy F. WMUO, be.
RECIPIENT:             USAF
   MK01\RPTK)0628026.004\ioaelRxUpd                  D-21                                         07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 October 1992
 Appendices
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER.
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .5) #65 001-ACR.4
 U.S. Air Force Instillation Restoration Program Peate AFB Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report Text-DRAFT FINAL
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 October 1993
 Report
 Zonel
 ARF (Zone 1 Shell)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .5) #66 001-6.4-4
 U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Petit AFB Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report Figuret-DRAFT
 FINAL
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 October 1993
 Figures
 Zonel
 ARF (Zone 1 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA(3.5)*67001-F
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report Appendices A, B, C,
D. E and F-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Zonel
ARF (Zone 1 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.5) #68 001-04/19/93
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix B DRAFT
FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (Draft Final used to supplement)
Appendix
Zonel
ARF
                                 t
PEA(3.5)*69001-L
U.S. Air Force Instillatio
and L-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF  *
October 1993
Appendices
Zonel
ARF (Zone 1 Shelf)
                     Restoration Program Peuc AFB Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report Appendices G, H, I,
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA 0-5) /70 001-H-4.95
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report Appendix H Part 1 of
2-DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 April 1993 (aleo UMd to supplement 10/93 DRAFT FINAL)
 Zonl
 ARF (Zone 1 Shelf 1)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.5) 471 001-H
 U.S. Air Fore* limillitioa Reetorition Program PeaM AFB Zone 1 Remedial Iinreetifation Report Appendix H Part 2 of
 2-DRAFT
 Roy F. Weeton, lac.
 USAF
 April  1993 (alao UMd to mpplemeni 10/93 DRAFT FINAL)
 Appendix
 ZoOCl
 ARF (Zoo* 1 Shelf)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTrTLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.5) 
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 July 1993
 Remedial Design
 LF-5
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.5) #105 001-13250-8
 U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Peue AFB, Remedial Design Excavation/Relocation Plan for Waste,
 Soil and Sediment Landfills 2, 4 and 5 Technical Specifications DRAFT (90% Submittal)
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 July 1993
 Specifications
 LF-2, LF-4. LF-5
 ARF
                                  *

 PEA (3.5) #114 001-009
 Letter Report to Establish Remedial Goals for Sediments in Flagstone Brook
 Roy F. Wetton, Inc.
 USAF
 19 April 1994
 Letter Report (RI)
 Flagstone Brook
 ARF, 3.5 Shelf
                                  *

 PEA (3.5) 115 001-039
 Cumulative Risk Evaluation for Zone 1 through Zone 5 at Pease AFB, N.H.
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 March 1994
 Risk Evaluation Report
 For Zones 1 through Zone 5
 ARF, General 3.5 Shelf
                                 #
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                        3.6 RI Ccrrepondence

PEA (3.6) #1 001-001
•Comments Regarding the Work Plan for the OtP Stage 2*
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
Air Force
27 July 1987
Comments Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) 12 001-006
•Letter Regarding DU>, Stage 2*
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Air Force
11 November 19S7
Letter Serving 3.4 (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF
                                 *
PEA (3.6) » 001-001
•Letter Stating Conform*!
» of the Stage 2, Quality Assunnrn Project Plan With Air Force IRP Practices'
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
Air Force
    MKQl\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxLapd
                              D-24
                                                           07/14/95

-------
 DATE:                  12 Novwtor 19S7
 TYPE:                  UnvS«mM,3.4(PniiaiMryRIFMldWori:R«poiti)
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Noo*
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      »

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) *6 001-001
 LONG TITLE:             "Umr Cooe«rninj Drilling Program'
 AUTHOR:                Roy F. Wmon, IDC.
 RECIPIENT:              Air FOR*
 DATE:                  20 Octootr 19U
 TYPE:                  Uwr Serving 3.4 (Pr«liiniii«ryRIFi«ld Work R«porti)
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.«) 19 001-002
 LONG TITLE:             'Unw Concerning Dupoul of Drill Cutting. From Sttg* 2 IRP InvMtigttion*'
 AUTHOR:                Roy F. W«MOO. Inc.
 RECIPIENT:              Air Fan*
 DATE:                  2 OcwlMr 19S9
 TYPE:                   U«wSir»Mig 3.4 (PrtBiniMryRI Field Work Report*)
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) «0 001-003
 LONG TITLE:             "Review Comment aa n* RUM D, Su|« 2IRP, Dwft Finil R^torf
 AUTHOR:                SttK of N«w lUapAin, D^MRnMol of EnvtroanMOUl SWVUM*
 RECIPIENT:              Air Fore*
 DATE:                  2t Fibratry 1990
 TYPE:                   R*viwrConnn«»ooPtai»n. Stij.2, IRP Saving 3.4 (Pwltiainiry RI FWd Work R^oM)
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) «1 001-011
 LONOTTTLE:             'RmMw CoanMi tot the PMM AFB, Ph«»» H, SUM 2 IRP Draft Fiml JUpoif
 AUTHOR:                 U.S. EPA
 RECIPIENT:              Air Fan*
 DATE:                   7 Much 1990
 TYPE:                   R*viwCaannnuS«rviaf 3.4(PnlimiiiMyRIFMld Wort lUpom)
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) «2 001-010
 LONG TITLE:             "RtWMW ConmaH R«t«du« th* IRP, Sttfe 2 Dnft Ffflil R*ort (DwMter I9t9)'
 AUTHOR:                 U.S. DipuaiMat of COOBBBC*, N«6aMl OeMaic and AtrnMobme AdaMMnboo
 RECIPIENT:              Ak Forei vit EPA
 DATE:                   7 Much 1990
 TYPE:                   Rwiw»CooBn«ouS«vinf 3.4 (PrrtimiiiuyRIFi^d Work R««tti)
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:      .       ARF
                                                      I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) f 13 001-020
 LONG TITLE:              *R«vww f "•"•«-'• to dM IRP Sli|* 2 RI/FS Dnft R«pon'
 AUTHOR:                 DHMTOHK of IM Air Force
RECIPIENT:             Roy F. WMOD, toc./Air FOR*
 DATE:                   IS Much 1990
TYPE:                  R*»iwO)0«B««iS«vinf 3.4 (PreiiinintrylUFirid Work R^ottt)
SECOND REFERENCE:     NOM
 LOCATION:               ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026,004\ronelrodjpd                  D-2S                                          07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) Hi 001-065
 •Sampling Results from Pease AFB, Newington, Portsmouth'
 Sute of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
 Air Force
 17 January 1991
 Sampling Data
 None
 ARF
                                 *

 PEA (3.6) #19 001-002
 'Installation Reiteration Program (DIP) at Pease AFB, NH°
 Department of the Air Force
 Air Force
 8 March 1989
 Memorandum — Pertaining to RI
 None
 ARF
                                 *

 PEA (3 .6) «20 001-002
 •Work Plan for the DtP Stage 3 and TTR #4'
 Department of the Air Force
 Air Force
 3 April 1989
 Memorandum — Pertaining to RI
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) Ł21 001-007
•Consolidated Comments to the IRP Stage 3 Work Plan for Peate Air Force Base, NH'
Department of the Air Force
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1 June 1989
Review Comments - Pertaining to RI
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 .6) 122 001-001
•Review Comments Regarding the Work Plan and QAPP - Stage 3*
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
Air Force
16 June 1989
Review Comments - Pertaining to RI
None
ARF
                                 t

PEA (3.6) 123 001-008
'Stage 3 Work Plan - Response to Comments'
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Air Force
29 June 1989
Response to Comments — Pertaining to RI
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3 .6) 124001-008
•Consolidated Comments to the IRP Stage 3 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Pease Air Force Base, NH*
Department of the Air Force
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxLapd
                              D-26
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:                   29 June 19*9
 TYPE:                   Review Comments - Pertaining to RI
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                         *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) 127 001-002
 LONGTTTLE:              "Leder wmmariang diacuatioai between Roy F. Weeton, Inc. and the New Hanvehin Depaitmem of EnviroonMoul
                         Service* concerning on-ehe handling and diapoaal of aoil and water geoented during drUUaf, development, purging, and
                         pump tearing of well*'
 AUTHOR:                 Roy F. Weeton, Inc.
 RECIPIENT:               Air Fane
 DATE:                   12 March 1990
 TYPE:                   Letter - Pertaining to 3.4
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                         I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) «2S 001-004
 LONG TITLE:              "Letter regarding recent and echeduled tame activity in the bulk fuel storage area*
 AUTHOR:                 Department of the Air Force
 RECIPIENT:               Roy F. Wenon, Inc.
 DATE:                   10 May 1990

 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                         I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) *29 001-007
 LONG TITLE:              -Review comment* on die Stage 3 Work Plan for the IRP'
 AUTHOR:                 U.S. EPA
 RECIPIENT:               Air Force
 DATE:                   7 June 1990
 TYPE:                   Review Comment* - Pertaining to RI
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                        *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) 130 001-002
 LONG TITLE:              'Leoer onnrernint propoead drilling locatiooi, Stage SB-
 AUTHOR:                 Roy F. Weeton, be.
 RECIPIENT:               Air Pone
 DATE:                   12JUM1990
 TYPE:                   Letter - Pertaining to RI
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                        t

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) 131001-002
 LONG TITLE:              'Letter retarding well installation modification'
 AUTHOR:                Roy F. Weeton, be.
RECIPIENT:              Air Force
 DATE:                  5 Jury 1990
TYPE:          „      Lener
 SECOND REFERENCE:     NOM
LOCATION:           .   ARF
                                                        I

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.6) 194 001-004
LONG TITLE:              'Leder regarding the disposal of clean weter, drilling mud and soil'
AUTHOR:                Roy F. Weeton, be.
RECIPIENT:              Air Force
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrcKLapd                   D-27                                           07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 25 September 1990
 Letter
 None
         ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TOTE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .6) 135 001-002
 'Letter regarding procedures for handling solids tnd liquids during well construction and soil borings"
 State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
 Air Force
 25 September 1990
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .6) 138001-002
 'Information Letter 3 - Documenting discussion on 25 October 1990*
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 Air Force
 29 October 1990
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (3. 6) #39 001-002
"Letter regarding the disposal of clean soil cutting! and drilling mud*
Department of the Air Force
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1 November 1990
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #40 001-007
"Stage 3 , Landfill 5 Site Characterization Summary Informal Technical Information Report; review comments"
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
Air Force
30 January 1991
Review Comments
PEA (3 .4) #32 001-338
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT.
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) Ml 001-008
'Response to Comments - Draft Final Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling And Analysis Plan"
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Air Force
7 February 1991
Letter/Response to Comments
None
ARF
                                 I
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #42 001-017
"EPA review comments on the Stage 3, Landfill 5 She Characterization Summary Informal Technical Information Report"
U.S. EPA
Air Force
14 February 1991
Review Comments
PEA (3.4) 132001-338
ARF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\ZonelnxUpd
                              D-28
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6)443 001-004
 •IMUM N«*4iof RMohition Prior to to Upcominj FwM Efforts'
 U.S. EPA
 Air Fore*
 10 April 1991
 No«»
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT.
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6)144 001-030
 •RMpooM to Coomiats. I^adfiD 5 ShaChancMrizMioaSuiimiiry-Informal Tadiaicd
 Roy F. WMon, Inc.
 Air Fore*
 7 IIIM 1991
 RMpODBt tO Cotnmaott
 PEA (3.4) 132001-33$
 ARF
                              *
 PEA (3-6) M5 001-030
 •(R«viaed)R*eponM to Command Landfill 5 - She <
 Roy F. WMHO, lac:
 Air Fore*
 17 July 1991
                        ity, Informal Technical InformttioD Report"
PEA (3.4) f32 001-338
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) IM6 001-038
                   Step 4 Work Ptan «nd SAP"
Roy F. WMoa, toe.
Air Fora*
                       ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT.
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3-«) *<7 001-011
•Rwimr coaiMBU on tfa* butaltaboa RtMontii
    i Plu (IRP) SIM* 4 Work PUn tod Sugpla« tad AndyiU PUn"
StM* of N«w Htopbin, DtputmM of EnviraoniMMl Swvic**
Air Fore*
1« OetotMT 1990
MOM
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA <3.6) MS 001-017
Tb* Tow* of NmnaMM
TWTownof N«wioftoo
Air Fore*
29 October 1990
Review CocmaMM
Nona
ARF
i oo *• IRP Sttg* 4 Work PUn'
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTrTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) *49 001-076
•EPA tKfaaicil nvMw of DM Draft IRP Staj* 4 Work PUn tad Sanpimt and Aariyw PUn fat PMM Air Fore* Btw1
U.S. EPA
Air Fora*
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\ronelro
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 2 November 1990
 Review Comment!
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:  •
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #50 001-002
 •Response to Air Force questions on fUte comments to the Stage 4 Work Plan"
 State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
 Air Force
 3 December 1990
 Response to Air Force questions on State of New Hampshire comments
 None
 ARF
                                 #

 PEA (3.6) #51  001-007
 "Response to EPA comments on the Pease AFB Stage 4 Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan*
 U.S. Air Force
 EPA
 10 December 1990
 Air Force responses to EPA comments
 None
 ARF
                                 #

 PEA (3.6) #52 001-008
 'Air Force Response to NHDES Comments - Drift Final Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan*
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 Air Force
 7 February 1991
 Response to Comments
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #53 001-00*
"EPA initial approval of the DIP Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan*
U.S. EPA
Air Force
13 March 1991
Letter "•""•""'•••g EPA initial approval of Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #54 001-058
'Air Force Response to EPA comments on the Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan'
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA
1991
RsMpoowto Comments
None
ARF
                                #

PEA (3.6) #56 001-001
EPA Concerns
U.S. Air Force - Internal Note
Art Ditto/USAF/Pease AFB
8 April 1991
Internal Racord of Phone Conversation with EPA and NHDES
None
ARF
                                #
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrocUpd
                              D-30
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) *57 001-004
 iMuea Needing Reeohmoc Prior to Upcoming Field Effiorti
 Johanna Huaer. RPM
 U3. EPA, Rtfion 1
 ARbur Ditto, RFM
 USAF, PMM AFB
 10 April 1991
 Stage 3 and 4 Work PUn (3.3)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) lit 001-002
 Review of Riik Aimiinent Data and Sampling Procedures
 Johanna Hunt**, USEPA
 Aithur Ditto, Pease AFB
 16 April 1991
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) t!9 001-067
 Concerns about Analytic*! Methods
 USAF
 USAF
 Johanna Hunter, USEPA
 Roy F. Weeton, Inc.
 23 April 1991
 Fax win Attachments
 NOD*
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 .6) #60 001-001
Suite* Wuer and Sediment Sampling Location*
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/PeueAFB
Johanna Hunter, RPM
U.S. EPA, Region 1
24 April 1991
Letter (Tranatnioal)
Nona
ARF
                               f

PEA (3.6) Ml 001-008
            , USEPA
Arthur Ditto, Peaa* AFB
29 April 1991
Nona
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) M2 001-004
Preliminary Sampling Schedule for Stage 3C KP Site* through November 1991
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
Richard Peaaa, NHDES
02 May 1991
Fax
Nona
ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\ZOnelrodjpd
                             D-31
                                                                                                    07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #63 001-003
 Review of April 25, 1991 Revised Analytic*] Methods
 Johanna Hunter, USEPA
 Arc Ditto, Peue AFB
 08 May 1991
 Letter
 None
 ARF
                                 t

 PEA (3.6) #64 001-002
 Review of April 25, 1991 Revised Analytical Methods
 Johanna Hunter, USEPA
 Art Ditto, Pease AFB
 08 May 1991
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .6) #65001-005
 Held Performance Review of Weston Activities, Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
 Mitre Corporation
 Dennis I
 Human Systems Division
 IRP Program Office
 HSD/YAQ
 Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5000
 14 May 1991
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #66 001-002
Revised Analytical Methods for Pease AFB
Logan VanLeigh, Capt., USAF, BSC
Technical Program Manager
Johanna Hunter, RPM
U.S. EPA, Region 1
31 May 1991
Letter
Sampling and Analysis Plan (3.1)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #67 001-005
Procedure for Establishing Background Metal Concentrations for Groundwater and Soil
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
03 June 1991
Now
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 .6) #68 001-012
Information to Auist Interpretation of Data Submitted by EPA to the Air Force
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
06 June 1991
None
ARF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxUpd
                              D-32
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6)1*9001-004
 RMofction Ltttr far Proocdun* fcr 1260 for VOC AMlyw of Wtur
 Mut McKMBM, PMM AFB
 Ricwjd PMM, NHDBS
 Cut Oyiter. EMh Twtoolofy, Su Bmudioo, CA
 JohimiHuaMr, USEPA
 06 Juw 1991
 Fax
 Now
 ARF
                              I
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) 00 001-001
  ckgt
 USAF
 Ricwtd PMM, NHDES
 07 Juw 1991
 NOD*
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) fJ\ 001-001
 Background DMraiwtioo Protocol*
 USAF
 JowaMHiuMr, USEPA
 07 Juw 1991
 NOM
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) m 001-003
Rnvind Analytical M«hodi tot PMM AFB OC/MS Mwhod S260 for VOA
Edwwd S. BUOM, Roy F. W««oa, Inc.
USAF
lUun»1991
Now
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) fJ3 001-001
Ltbontocy Swvicw
Rkfavd PMW, NHDES
Ait Dtao, PMM AFB
13 JUM 1991
Now
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6)475 001-002
EPA Pw*> T«« Inform*
JohiaatHuattr.RPM
U.S. EPA R*f»o 1
ArtDiBo, RPM
USAF
PMM AFB
27IUD.1991
i to b* PraviMd by Air Fete*
Now
ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) J76 001-002
 Roy F. Weston, Inc., Proposed Methods for Determining Background Concentrations tt Pease Air Force Btse, New
 Himpshire
 George Rice, Mitre Corporation
 Dennis Lundquist
 Human Systems Division DIP Program Office
 HSD/YAQ
 Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5000
 02 Jury 1991
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3. 6) m 001-001
 TransmhUl Letter for Protocols for Basrtine Risk Assessments
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/PeueAFB
 Richard Pe.se, RPM
 NHDES
 IS Jury 1991
 Tnnsmittal Letter
 Butliw* Risk Assessments
 ARF
                                 t

 PEA (3.6) #78 001-001
 Transmhlal Letter for Protocols for Baseline Risk Assessments
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 US AF/Pease AFB
 Johanna Hunter, RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
 18 Jury  1991
 Transmitul Letter
 Ramlin* RuUc Assessments
 ARF
                                 0

 PEA (3. 6) «80 001-002
 Exploratory Boring Soil Sampling Procedures
 Edward S. Barnes
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 Capt. Logan Van T*«g**
 U.S. Air Force
 Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
 26 Jury 1991
 Letter
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) Ml 001-001
    id Mo
             ngWeOs
Scott Douw, Hydrogeotogist
Groundwater Technology Section
Groundwatcr Protection Bureau
NHDES
MarkMcKeazie
USAF/Pease AFB
31 July 1991
Letter
None
ARF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxLand
                              D-34
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.6) 1C 001-006
 LONG TITLE:             R«vwwef ttwPropoMdProoidunfor BKkinuiid DMmniiiMion PraloeoU for P«u* Av Fan* BM^ Paramoutfi, NH
 AUTH(»:               JohttMHiulK, USEPA
 RECIPIENT:              Art Ditto, PMM AFB
 DATE:                  02 Au|U« 1991
 TYPE:                  Utt«r
 SECOND REFERENCE:     NOM
 LOCATION.              ARF
                                                      t

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.6) «3 001-001
 LONGTTTLE:             V«Md Moaftarii« W«IU - RMpooMtoJury 31, 1991 Lean on HIM IMIM Form NHDES
 AUTHOR:                Arthur Ditto, RPM
 RECIPIENT:              Scott DOMM
                        NHDES
 DATE:                  26 Au|u* 1991
 TYPE:                  Utter
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      f

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) **4 001-001
 LONG TITLE:             Split Suoplinf Recuhi
 AUTHOR:                Arthur Ditto, RPM
                        U. S. Air Force/PMM AFB
 RECIPIENT:              JohiaM Hitter, RPM
                        U.S. EPA. R*fion 1
                               ud
                        Ricfatrd PMM. RPM
                        NHDES
 DATE:                  9 September 1991
 TYPE:                  LMttr
 SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF


 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) «5 001-002
 LONG TITLE:             Field Oversight - September 1991
 AUTHOR:                Rtafcerd PMM, NHDES
 RECIPIENT:              Arthur Ditto, USAF RPM
 DATE:                  2* October 1991
 TYPE:                   Utter
 SECOND REFERENCE:      RI Field Work (3.4)
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                                      f

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (3.6) fS6 001-001
 LONG TITLE:            Tnontal Utter for Data Collected on Sur&ce Wtur tod Sediment Beckfrouod Coocenmtkm
 AUTHOR:               JoiuaM HuaMr, RPM
                        U.S. EPA, Region 1
 RECIPIENT:              Ed BUM*
                        Project MeMger
                       Roy F. Wenon, Inc.
 DATE:                 2 December 1991
TYPE:                  TfiMmitttl Utter
 SECOND REFERENCE:     NOM
 LOCATION:             ARF
                                                      i

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.6) «7 001-002
LONG TITLE:            Region*! Litentur* Setrch to tasM. Development of ihe Sediment ind Surface W«ter BtckgrouodDeieniiiiiMion for PMM
                       AFB, Poranwuth, NH
AUTHOR:               JOUHM HuaMr, USEPA
RECIPIENT:             An Ditto, PMM AFB



    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zooelrod.«p
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 2 December 1991
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3. 6) «8 001-001
 Fugitive Duit Ptthwiy in the Baseline Risk Aueument
 Arthur Ditto, RPM, USAF
 PeueAFB
 Johanna Hunter RPM
 U.S. EPA Region 1
 3 January 1992
(3.5) - RI Reports

            *
 Bueline Risk
 ARF
 PEA (3.6) #89 001-001
 Evaluation of the Air Pathway in Bueline Risk Aweument
 USAF
 Johanna Hunter, USEPA
 11 February 1992
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .6) #90 001-001
 Evaluation of the Air Pathway in p«««liiMi Riak Aueument
 USAF
 Richard Peaae, NHDES
 11 February 1992
 Letter
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #95 001-001
Trmnraittal Letter for Submitul of Bueline Riak Ai
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/PeueAFB
Richard Peue, RPM
NHDES
25 February 1992
                       tnt ProtoeoU
Balding RUk Aueaatnent
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
PEA (3.6) 196 001-001
Trantmhtal Letter for Revised Bait line Riak Ataesament Protocola
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/PMW AFB
Joharma Hunter, RPM
USEPA, Region 1
25 February 1992
Trausnuttal Letter
Revised Bueline Riak Aueument
ARF
                                t

PEA (3.6)198 001-003
Requect for EPA Split Sampling Renilta
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/Peue AFB
    MK01\RPT:00628026.0M\zonelrodJpd
                             D-36
                                                         07/14/95

-------
 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 Johanna HuaMr, RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
 9 Much 1992
 Noo*
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONQTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) 199 001-D1
 Letter Report of Reeuhs of Statistical Comparison of Stage 3C Samples to the 66 Other Background Samples
 Roy F. WMOB, IDC.
 USAF
 9 Much 1992
 Letter Report
 PEA (3.5)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #100 001-001
 Trenaminal Letter for Submiiul of Stag* 4 Work PUn Addendum Number 2 on the Drift Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis
 Plan Addendum Number 2
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/PMMAFB
 Johaeoa Hinttr
 U.S. EPA, R«g»on 1
 24 March 1992
 Traaraiaal LMMT
 PEA (3-D. PEA (3.3)
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #101 001-001
Tranmiatl UOac for Submiaal of Stag* 4 Addendum Numbar 2 Work Plan and Sampling and Anaryiii Plan
Arthur Dino, RPM
USAF/PMMAFB
Richard PMM, RPM
NHDES
24 March 1992
PEA (3.1), PEA (33)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #102 001-001
Data You May B* Abl* to Provide
Thome. R. Marti, Roy F. Wettoa, Inc.
Mark McKeoie, PMM AFB
26 May 1992
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) >103 001-022
Evaluation of Air Pathway in BaMline Risk
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Dmo, Peue AFB
13 April 1992
Letter with ABachmeats
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
PEA (3.6) #106001X102
Oversight Role of Regulatory Agencies at Pease AFB
Michael Daly, USEPA
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJpd
                             D-37
07/14/95

-------
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
 26 May 1992
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #111001-001
 Submhul of Draft Secondary Document!, Suge 4 Work Plan Addendum 3 and Suge 4 Health and Safety Plan Addendum
 USAF
 Richard Peue, NHDES
 24 June 1992
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3. 6) #112 001-001
 Submittal of Drift Secondary Documemi, Suge 4 Work Plan Addendum 3 and Suge 4 Health and Safety Plan Addendum
 USAF
 Johanna Hunter, USEPA
 24 June 1992
 Letter
 None
 ARF
                                f

 PEA (3.6) 1113 001-002
 Additional Field Oversight
 USAF
 Michael Daly, USEPA
 8 July 1992
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) #116 001-021
Pease Air Force Base Groundwater Modeling Letter Report
Lee dePenia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
29 July 1992
Letter with Repent
None
ARF
                                t

PEA (3.6) f 120 001-001
Monitor Well Inventory and Inspection Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
Richard Pane, NHDES
IS August 1992
Letter
None
ARF
                                #

PEA (3.6) 1122 001-002
Resuhs of Background Surface Water Sediment Location Walkover
Richard Pease, RPM, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, RPM, Pease AFB
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodjpd
                             D-38
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
27 Aufiut 1992
 PEA (6.4)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #123 001-005
Ride AiuiimiBt luu
LeedePenu
TaikM*oafcr
Roy F. Weeton, Inc.
Aflhur Ditto, RPM
iforPttMAFB
28 AufUft 1992
Letter Report
PEA (3 .5)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #124 001-001
TtaMOBtttJ Letter for Submntal of Groundwater Background Letter Repon
Mark McKeasie for Arthur Ditto
USAF/PeeaeAFB
Richard PeaM, RPM
NHDES
        and
Johanna Hunter
U.S. EPA, Region 1
1 September 1992
Noo.
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) f 125 001-002
Policy on DM* Tnnifa: During Pumping T«U
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/PMwAFB
Riehnd PMW, RPM
NHDES
•ad
labumtHunMr, RPM
US EPA. RH»OO 1
NOD*
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #126 001-001
TnaMatal Ltan for Subauul of Drift Primtry Documm, Siu 3 No Fu
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/PMNAFB
lohuBMHuaMr.RPM
U.S. EPA/Rtfioa 1
9 S^ttariwr 1992
                                    tfatt Action D«
i Documm (NFADD)
SH*3
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
PEA (3.6) #127 001-001
Tnnanintl Lmu for SubmitMl of Dnft Primary Documnt, Ste 3 No Further Aetna Decision Document (NFADD)
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/PeeaeAFB
    N(K01\RPT:00628026.004\zooelro
-------
 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 Richard Pease, RPM
 NHDES
 9 September 1992
 Letter
 Site 3
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .6) #128001-003
 Summary of Risk Issues Meeting of August 19, 1992
 Johanna Hunter, RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/Peaie AFB
 16 September 1992
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #130 001-002
 Field Oversight - Mid-August-Mid-September
 Richard Peaae, NHDES
 Arthur Ditto, RPM  Peaie AFB
 7 October 1991
 PEA (3.4)
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #131 001-001
Peue AFB Zone 1 She Characterization Summary
LeedePenia
Taak Manager
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Capt. Carl Woerhle
U.S. Air Force
Baae Closure Division
Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
21 October 1992

Zonel
ARF
                                f

PEA (3.6) 1137001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Documents, Zones 1, 2, and 5 Site Characterization Summaries
USAF
Richard Peas*. NHDES
26 October 1992
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) f 138001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Documents, Zones 1, 2, and 5 Site Characterization Summaries
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
26 October 1992
None
ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelRxUpd
                             D-40
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) f 139 001-001
 Sutattal of Stic* 4 Sanplint tad An*ly*i» Plan
 USAF
 JohanaHumar, U3EPA
 26 October 1992
 Now
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #140 001401
 SubmMal of SM|« 4 «"T'T«t and Analytic Plan
 USAP
 Ricfaud PMW, NHDES
 26 October 1992
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA 0.6) #145 001-004
No Further Action D«citioo for Sh* 3
Arthur Dtao, RPM
USAF, PMW AFB
Johanna Huittr, RPM
U.S. EPA, Region 1
1 Decanter 1992
Site 3
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 •«)'146 001-001
Application of the Reaaonable Maximum Expocura (RME) in Risk i
Aftfaur Ditto, RPM
USAF, PMW AFB
Richard PMW, RPM
NHDES
1 Dac«Bfe«r 1992
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:

LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR.
PEA (3.6) 1147 001-001
y-^ii.f^ti^i of off-Bu* W«U Inventory Report
Arthur Dino, RPM
USAF, PMW AFB
Rienard PMW, RPM
NHDES
4 D*canb«r 1992
Off-Baw W«D InvOTtofy L«Mr Rnoit of 17 Scpumbw 1992
PEA (3.5)
ARF
                               t

PEA (3.6) #141001-001
Tnaaoiaal Im»f for Subnuoal of QuaUty Awunnc* Project Plan (QAPP) Ponton of th* Stag* 4 Samplint ud Analyut
Plan(SAP)Nurab«3
Arthur Dteo, RPM
USAF, PMW AFB
    MK01\RFT:00678026.004\zonelroiUDd
                            D-41
07/14/95

-------
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 Johanna Hunter, RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
         and
 Richard Pease, RPM
 NHDES
 11 December 1992
 Letter
 PEA (3.1)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #149001-002
 Request for Deadline Extension
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF, Peaae AFB
 Johanna Hunter, RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
        and
 Richard Peaie, RPM
 NHDES
 23 December 1992
 Letter
 PEA (6.3)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3 .6) #150 001-001
 Tranimittal of EPA Maximum Ritk Calculation Addenda to Site 5,8, 32/36 and 34 Draft Final RI Reports
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF, Peace AFB
 Johanna Hunter, RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
        and
 Richard Peaae, RPM
 NHDES
 29 December 1992
 Letter
 Site* 5, 8, 32/36 and 34; PEA (3.5)
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3. 6) 4156 001402
Request for Deadline Extension
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Peaae, NHDES
19 March 1993
PEA (3 .5)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (3.6) «60001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, landfill 5 Record of Decision
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 April 1993
Letter
LF-5
ARF
                               I

PEA (3.6) #161 001-001
Submhlal of Draft Documents
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
    MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\zonelKxlapd
                             D-42
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 21 April 1993
 Zow3.Zow>4.LF-5
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #162 001-001
 Subtotal of Dnft Documtoti
 USAF
 RicfaMd PMM, NHDES
 21 April 1993
 Zoot3, Zoo* 4, LF-5
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6) #163 001-001
 Submttl of Dftn Pnnuy Docunmt, Luidfili 5 R*cotd of Decision
 USAF
 JohiaMHuoMr. EPA
 21 April 1993
 LF-5
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) f 164 001-001
Subtotal of Dnft Prantiy Docui
USAF
Rknud PMM, NHDES
2» April 1993
, Zone 1 Rmwdul InvMugatioaRMOit
Zoo* 1, PEA (3.5)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONO TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #165 001-001
Subtotal of Dnft Primtiy Doeunwm, Zone 1 R«
USAF
lohumHumr, EPA
28 April 1993
         idol bvMbgMionRipofl
    1, PEA (3.5)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONO TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3 .6) #170 001-001
Loertow of Suite* WtMn of th« Stm of New HuBMhin in *• Vicinity of FOTBMT PMM AFB
Afthur Ditto, PMM AFB
Riduid PMM, NHDES
LMUrwitfa AttMfamwt
Now
ARF(Swtion3.6BiaMr)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (3.6) #171001-002
Zoo* 1 Dnft Final RMndul InvMbfttion R«po«
NHDES
USAF
24 November 1993
ZOMl
ARF(SMbon3.6BinMT)
    MKDl\RFT:00628026.0M\zoiielio
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.6) #175 001-002
LONG TITLE:             Zone 1 Drift Final Remedial Investigation Report
AUTHOR:                NHDES
RECIPIENT:              USAF
DATE:                  27, November 1993
TYPE:                   Letter
SECOND REFERENCE:     Zone 1
LOCATION:              ARF (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (3.6) #176 001-003
LONG TITLE:             Zone 1 Drift Final Remedial Investigation Report
AUTHOR:                NHDES
RECIPIENT:              USAF
DATE:                   15 December 1993
TYPE:                   Letter
SECOND REFERENCE:     Zone 1
LOCATION:              ARF (Section 3 .6 Binder)
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJpd                   D-44                                          07/14/95

-------
                                             4.1 ARAR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4.1) f\ 001-024
 New Hampahire ARAR Lin Update
 Richard H. Peaae, P.E.
 NHDES
 Arthur Ditto, P.E.
 RPM, U.S. Air Force/Pew. AFB
 13 April 1992
 Latter end TablM
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4.1)12001-8.3
 InmUttiooRMtontkmPr
 Roy F. Weeion, Inc.
 USAF
 January 1993
 ARARt
                   «ramStafc4,BeMwifeARARi, PMM Air Force BaM,NH03S03-Draft
ARF, IR
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (4.1) 13 001-002
Waiverabiljty of Env-WS 430, Surface Water Quality Regulations, u an ARAR
Arthur Ditto, PMM AFB
Richard PMM, NHDES
71 TTanemhar im
Nona
ARF (Section 4.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.1) *4 001-025
New Hampehire ARAR Lin Updatt
NHDES
USAF
23 DicambiT 1993
lanar rail rtitarlimanr
Nona
ARF(S«tioa4.1 Bind«)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) n 001-BJ9

Roy F. Weawo, fee.
USAF
October 1991
Report
Sate 5
ARF
                                              4J FiiiTiTlj Reporti
                       . Stage 3C, Initial Seneoiat of Ahemativee for DIP Site 5, PMM AFB, NH
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
Final
Roy F. Weeton, Inc.
USAF
                 Profnm, Sta|* 3C, Feenbility Study for OtP Site 5, PMM AFB, NH - Technical Report - Drift
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodjpd
                            D-45
                                                                           07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 August 1992
 Report
 SiteS
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4.2) #7 001-5.2.14
 Installation Reiteration Program, Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site 5, Pease AFB, NH - Figures - Draft Final
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 August 1992
 Figure*
 SiteS
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4.2) K 001-1.3
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site S, Pease AFB, NH - Appendices A-I.  Draft
 Final
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 August 1992
 Appendices
 SiteS
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) f!6 001-MM3-9
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Initial Screening of Alternatives Report DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1993
Feasibility Study
Zonel
ARF
                                 tt
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #44 001-R.4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 1 Feasibility Study Report, Text - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
December 1993
Feasibility Study
Zonel
ARF (Zone 1 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.2) #45 001-J.7
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 1 Feasibility Study Report Appendices - DRAFT
FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
December J993
Feasibility 'study
Zonel
ARF (Zone 1 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (4.3) #1 001-220
"Proposed Plan for I
Roy F. Weston, Inc., Inc
EPA, NHDES
                          4J  Proposed Plan

                      3, Field Maintenance Squadron Equipment Cleaning Site, Fire Department Training Area 1 '
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrodJpd
                               D-46
                                                                                07/14/95

-------
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                       October 1990
                       WorkPUa
                       ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                       PEA (4.3) *2 1.1-Fifun 4
                       R*vi»*d Propond Pbn for IRP Sitt 5, Undfill 5 Source Ant - Revind Drift Fjatl
                       Roy F. WMton, Inc.
                       USAF, EPA, NHDES, Public
                       July 1993
                       PropoMdPUa
                       Landfill 5
                       ARF (LF-5 Shelf), Dt
                                                     t
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                       PEA (4.3) 19 001-R.l
                       iMUlMoD RMKmtioa P
                       Roy F. WMUO, Inc.
                       USAF
                       Jttuuy 1994
                       PropoMdPUn
                       Zone  1
                       ARF (Zoo* 1 Shelf)
                                              , Propoetd PUn for IRP Zone 1. Peue AFB, NH
'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTOE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                       PEA (4.5) #1 001-006
                                                                                     .FOT
                       1 (October 1990, dnft) RCVMW ComnMBH'
                       SttMof N«wH>npdiin, D^uoMtt of Eov
                       Air Fore*
                       27 Nov»lMr 1990
                       SUM of N*wH*ap«bin Review ComnwoH
                       Noo.
                       ARF
                                                            ial SwvieM
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION.
                       PEA (4.5) *2 001-016
                       '*P4 "l8"* f «~~»~«.~.*.lBPPrnr»^lPI..«f»t-.iirf
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4.5) #4 001-001
 Submitul of Draft Final Primiiy Document, Landfill 5 Feasibility Study Report
 USAF
 Richard Pease, NHDES
 Unknown
 Letter
 Landfill 5
 ARF
                                #

 PEA (4.5) K 001-002
 Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs)
 Richard Pease, NHDES
 Art Ditto, Pease AFB
 25 November 1991
 Letter
 Pea (6.4)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4.5) #8 001-001
 TjnHfill 3 Decision Document
 USAF
 Edward S. Barnes
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 1 Weston Way
 Wen Chester, PA 19380
 03 February 1992
 Letter
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #13 001-001
Request for Deadline Extension for Review of the Draft IRP Site 5 Feasibility Report Dated April 1992
Johanna M. Hunter, USEPA
Art Ditto, Peas* AFB
22 May 1992
She 5
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #18 001-002
Feasibility Study Reports
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
10 August 1992
Letter
She* 5, 34, and 32/36
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) #19 001-001
Submittal of Landfill 5 Draft Proposed Plan
USAF
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
12 August 1992
1 *tt*v
Landfills
ARF
                                #
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrocUpd
                             IMS
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (45) 120 001-001
 Submfcal of Landfill 5 Dnft Prapond PUn
 USAF
 Richard PMM, NHDES
 12Au|«i*1992
 Landffil5
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4.5) 121 001-003
 Landfill 5 SOUK* ATM Dnft Final Inability Study R*poit
 Edward S. BUM*. Roy F. WMOO, Inc.
 USAF
 Johanna Hunttr, USEPA
 Richard PMM, NHDES
 14AU|IM1992
 UndfillS
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (4S) m 001-001
 Subntaal of Draft Final Primary Documm, Undfill 5 F*anbilily Study Report
 USAF
 Johanna Hunter. USEPA
 lSAu|UMl992
LudfillS
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) 123 001-001
Submtaal of Dnft Final Primary Document, Landfill 5 F«aribility Study Raxnt
USAF
Riehanl PMM, NHDES
UAu(iull992
Landfills
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) 127 001-001
Undfill 5 Dnft PrapOMd PUn
USAF
Johanna Huntar, USEPA
Riehaid PMM. NHDES
17Novw*«1992
LandfillS
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) *52 001-001
SubMjml of Dnft Secondary Doeumaot, Zoo* 1 Initial Scrarainf of AlurnativM
Arthur Ditto, PMM AFB
Richard PMM, NHDES
3Junal993
Zonal
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
PEA (4.5) 153 001-001
Submtaal of Dnft Secondary Dominant, Zont 1 Initial ScrMninf of Ahamativw
Arthur Diao, PMM AFB
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonclnxUpd
                            D-49
07/14/95

-------
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Mike Dtly, EPA Region 1
3 June 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:  .
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (4.5) *54 001-001
Submitttl of Proposed Plans for Landfills 2 and 4 and Landfill 5
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Richard Pease, NHDES
25 June 1993
Letter
LF-2, LF-4, LF-5
ARF
                                #

PEA (4.5) #58 001-003
Former Pease AFB, Surface Water Issues
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
29 November 1993
Letter
None
ARF (Section 4.5 Binder)
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodjpd
                             D-50
                                                                                                     07/14/95

-------
                                                  5.1 ROD

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (S.I) 12 001-12.1
LONG TITLE:            U.S. Air Fore« toiUlUtion RMWHUOC Program, PMM AFB. Record of Detinoofor t Source AIM Remedul Action «
                       Landfill 5
AUTHOR:               Roy F. Wetton, Inc.
RECIPIENT:             USAF
DATE:                 September 1993
TYPE:                  ROD
SECOND REFERENCE:     LF-5
LOCATION:             ARF (LF-5 Shelf)
                                            5.2 >••*••»!»ROD

»NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
                                     5.3 ExpMBanaeg of!

•NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TOME
                                              5.4 C
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (54) #1 001-001
LONG TITLE:             Region 1 ROD Mo
-------
                                              Cooperanre Agreements / SMOAs
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.1) #1 001-013
 "Memorandum of Understanding Executed Between the Town of Newington, NH, and Pease Air Force Base, NH"
 Town of Newington/Peate Air Force Baae
 Air Force
 22 August 1980
 Memorandum of Understanding
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.1) n 001-004
 "Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory
 (USAFOEHL) and Pease Air Force Base relating to procedures for conducting the IRP"
 U.S. Department of the Air Force
 Air Force
 31 Jury 1987
 Memorandum of Understanding
 None
 ARF
                                 f>
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                  6.2 Federal Facility Agreement (FFA)

PEA (6.2) « 001-097
'Federal Facility Agreement under CERCLA Section 120*
U.S. EPA, Region I, State of New Hampshire and the U.S. Department of the Air Force'
EPA, NHDES, Air Force
24 April 1991
Federal Facility Agreement
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) fi 001-003
•Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes'
Pease Air Force Baae
See Distribution Lilt
16 January 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) *3 001-003
•Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes'
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
20 February 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) *4 001-003
•Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes'
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
20 March 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF. IR
                                9
    MK01\RPT:00628026.0W\zonelro
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TRIE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) IS 001-002
•Rmtdid ProjM Muu«m MMtncMinutM •
PMM Air Fom But
SMDuttibutiODLin
17 April 1991
MMting MioutM
NOD*
ARF, IR
                              *

PEA (6 3) #6 001-002
PMM Air Fon* BM*
SMDutribuboaLiM
21 May 1991
MMtmt MinulM
Noo*
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) n 001-002
"Ftn'Hi*1 Project Muipn Meeting Miauui'
PMM Air Fan* But
24 Junt 1991
Noa*
ARF. IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.2) tl 001-0.4
ModificttMM 1 to PMW AFB F«J«r«l Facilhiw ApMOMBt
USAF
MiefaMl Driy, EPA Rifta I
Ricfaud PMM, NHDES
FFA ModffieMioa
NOM
ARF,
                                        
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) « 001-031
 'Completed Applications for Department of the Army Permit (ENG Form 435) tnd New Hampshire Wetlands Board
 Permit
 Department of the Air Force
 Army Corpt of Engineer!. New England Division
 31 August 1989
 Letter and Attachments
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTrTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTrTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE.
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) #4 001-002
 "letter regarding emergency discharge exclusion from the requirement for a permit under the National Pollutant Discharge
 Elimination System (NPDES)"
 US EPA
 Air Force
 29 September 1989
 Letter
 None
 ARF
                                  t

 PEA (6.3) #5 001-002
 "Letter in response to Air Force question regarding necessity of e permit for me proposed landfill cleanup operation'
 Department of the Army
 Air Force
 17 October 1989
 Letter
 None
 ARF
                                  *

 PEA (6.3) *6 001-001
 'Agenda and Notes for Working Meeting with U.S. EPA and State of New Hampshire"
 US Air Force
 See Distribution List
 21 November 1989
 Agenda and Meeting Notes
 None
 ARF
                                  t

 PEA (6.3) fl 001-025
 'Letter response to  Air Force letter of 22 August 1990 regarding CERCLA remedial actions at Pease Air Force Base, 404
 peiuiil not required*
 Department of the Army
 Air Force
 3 October 1990
 Response Ltltw
 None
 ARF
                                  I

 PEA (6.3)18 001-033
 'Point Piper on Installation Restoration Program (Pease AFB) and Attachments (Prepared for a meeting of I. Coit and
 M. Aldrich. of Senator Humphrey's office, with Pease, NHDES, WESTON, and OEHL)'
 Pease Air Force Base
J. Coit & M. Aldrich of Senator Humphrey's Office
31 March 1989
 Letter
None
ARF
                                  t
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:    PEA (63) 19 001-003
 LONG TITLE:            •RecoaMneodetiooto PUee PMM AFB on ttw National Priority Li* (NPL)*
 AUTHOR:               Depenneotof th* Air FOR*
 RECIPIENT:             US EPA
 DATE:                 27Iun*19S9
 TYPE:                  Leaer
 SECOND REFERENCE:     Noo*
 LOCATION:             ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:    PEA (6.3) f 10 001-004
 LONG TITLE:            RMMdial Project Maufm' MMliof Minut*. of January 16, 1991
 AUTHOR:               After Dido, RPM
RECIPIENT:             U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendee*
DATE:                 Meeting Dal*: 16 January 1991
TYPE:                  Meeting MinuM*
SECOND REFERENCE:     None
LOCATION:             ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (6 3) #11 001-004
LONG TITLE:            B.meiliil Project Manafen' Maeting Minute, of February 20, 1991
AUTHOR:               After DHto, RPM
                       USAF/PMMAFB
RECIPIENT:             U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendi.i
DATE:                  Meeting Daw: 20 February 1991
TYPE:                  Meeting MiaM*
SECOND REFERENCE:     Noo.
LOCATION:             ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (6.3) #12 001-004
LONG TITLE:            R«n*dial Project Manafi
AUTHOR:               USAF
RECIPIENT:             SM Dwributioa
DATE:                  20 March 1991
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:     Nan*
LOCATION:             ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (6 J) f 13 001-004
LONG TITLE:            RMMdial Project Managm' MMUBI MUMM of April 17,1991
AUTHOR:               After Dido, RPM
                       USAF/PMMAFB
RECIPIENT:              U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attend***
DATE:                  17 April 1991
TYPE:                  Meetiai Minute.
SECOND REFERENCE:     None
LOCATION:              ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (63) f 14 001-003
LONG TITLE:            Remedial Project Manaten' Meeting Minm** of May 21. 1991
AUTHOR:               After Dido, RPM
                       USAF/PMMAFB
RECIPIENT:              U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendeei
DATE:                  21 May 1991
TYPE:                  Meetiaf Minute.
SECOND REFERENCE:     Noo.
LOCATION:              ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026,004\ionelro
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) #15 001-004
 Notification of Additional Investigative Work in i Wetland
 USAF
 NHDES
 Wetlands Board
 P.O. Box 2008
 Concord. NH 03301-3406
 14 June 1991
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
 PEA (6.3) #16 001-003
 Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutei of July 24, 1991
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/Peaae AFB
 U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendee*
 24 June 1991
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF
                                8

 PEA (6.3) #17 001-003
 Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutei of August 26, 1991
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/Peese AFB
 U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendee*
 24 Jury 1991
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF
                                If

 PEA (6.3) #18 001-004
 Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes of September 26, 1991
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/Pease AFB
 U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendees
 21 August 1991
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF
  ,.                            I

 PEA (6.3) #19 001-004
 Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutei
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/Peese AFB
 U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendees
26 September 1991
Meeting Minute*
 None
 ARF
                                #

PEA (6.3) #20 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, RPM
 USAF/Pease AFB
U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendees
    MK01\RFTK)0628026.004\zonelRxLapd
                              D-56
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:                  27 October 1991
 TYPE:                  MMtaf MiauMt
 SECOND REVERENCE:     NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (6.3) fi\ 001-003
 LONGTTTLE:             Rnwdul Project Muafin' Mating Miautw
 AUTHOR:               Arthur Ditto, RFM
                       USAF/PMMAFB
 KECIPIENT:              U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF AtModMi
 DATE:                  20 Novtmbw 1991
 TYPE:                  MMtiac MiaulM
 SECOND REFERENCE:     NOM
 LOCATION:              ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (6.3) 122 001X103
LONO TITLE:             RMMditl ProJMt M«M|«i' MMtiac Miouut of January 27, 1992
AUTHOR:               Arthur Ditto, RPM
                       USAF/PMMAFB
RECIPIENT:              U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF AuandM.
DATE:                  19 D*c*mb«r 1991
TYPE:                  M«Kin M'lr1***
SECOND REFERENCE:     Non*
LOCATION:              ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (63) «23 001-003
LONG TITLE:             RMMOM! Project Mtat|«s' Mating MiauM
AUTHOR:               Arthur Ditto, RPM
                       USAF/PMMAFB
RECIPIENT:              U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF AMOMM
DATE:                  27 Itmury 1992
TYPE:                  MMtajMiiMM
SECOND REFERENCE:     NOM
LOCATION:              ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:    PEA (6.3) «24 001-003
LONG TITLE:            RMMdMl Piojwt MuMmn'MMtiaf MiaMM
AUTHOR:              Arthur Ditto, RPM
                      USAF/PMMAFB
RECIPIENT:             U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF AHairtm
DATE:                 25 Ftbiuuy 1992
TYPE:                 MMtuK MiouM*
SECOND REFERENCE:    NOM
LOCATION:             ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:    PEA (63) 125 001-002
LONGTTTLE:            RMMdttl PraJMt Mumgm' MMtiog MinutM
AUTHOR:               Arthur Ditto, RPM
                      USAF/PMMAFB
RECIPIENT:             U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF AMnteM
DATE:                 07 April 1992
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:    NOM
LOCATION:             ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:    PEA (6.3) «6 001-004
LONG TITLE:            NH W«luu Pwmit for National PriorUM Li« RdaMd Work
AUTHOR:               USAF
    MK01\RFT:00628Q26.0M\zoMlRxUpd                 D-57                                        07/14/95

-------
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 NHDES
 Wetlands Board
 P.O. Box 2008
 Concord, NH 03301-2008
 24 April 1992
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) #27 001-002
 Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
 USAF
 See Distribution
 22 April 1992
 Minute*
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) #28 001-008
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes, June 3, 1992
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/Feaac AFB
U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendees
3 June 1992
Meeting Minute*
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) 129 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minute* of August 21 .
Arthur Ditto. RPM
USAF/Peaw AFB
U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendee*
Meeting Date: 21 August 1992
Meeting Minute*
None
ARF
                                              1991
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) *30 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minute* - September 10, 1992
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF/PeeaeAFB
U.S. EPA/NHDES/USAF Attendee*
10 September 1992
Meeting Minute*
Nona
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) *32 001-002
RemeduU Project Managers' Meeting Minutes - October 20, 1992
Arthur Ditto, RPM
EPA, NHDES, USAF
20 October 1992
Minute*
None
ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelTO
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) 133 001-003
 Applicnoo of th* ItMtooibto MVDIDUID Łxponm AME) ID Riik Ai
 Vmag *• •Anngt Maximum"
 Richard PMM. NHDES
 Art Ditto, PMM AFB
 JohamaHurttr, USEPA
 Ctpt. WoHhlt, AFCEE
 22 October 1992
                                ; RMJUMI for Sin Specific Jmtiftcatioo for
 Norn
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) *34 001-001
 Guidebook for Eaviroaa
                   nut PC
 Richud PMM, NHDES
 Aft Ditto. PMM AFB
 lohuncHunr, USEPA
 4 Novwribv 19»2
 Noo»
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) *36 001-AluchnM» 6
 QuutMiy RMOR, SMood Qiuit« 1991
 Roy F. WMIOO, be.
 EPA, NHDES, USAF
 19 July 1991
 QuaiMrtyRMon
 NOM
 ARF, Ait DiBo't offie* filM
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) *37 001-034
QunMfty Rowci, Third Qwutw 1991
Roy F. WMMO, be.
EPA, NHDES, USAF
24 October 1991
QuuMriy RMOR, Tnanuttal LMMTS
NOM
ARF, Art Dteo'i offie* «|M
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) #31001-030
QuuMriy RMOR, 1
Roy F. WMtoa, be.
EPA. NHDES, USAF
14 laauuy 1992
QuuMriyRwon
NOM
ARF, Art Dtoo'i offic* fite
•1991
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) «39 001-020
QuuMrty Rioon, Pint Quarar 1992
Roy F. WMWO, be.
EPA, NHDES, USAF
15 April 1992
Quuuriy Ripon
ARF, An Ditto1! offic* Ł!M
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zoaelnxiJixl
                           D-59
                                                  07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) #40 001-032
 Quarterly Report, Second Quarter 1992
 Roy F. Weston, IDC.
 EPA, NHDES, USAF
 14 July 1992
 Quarterly Report
 None
 ARF, Ait Ditto'! office file>
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.3) #41 001-043
 Quarterly Report, Third Quarter 1992
 Roy F. Weaton, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES, USAF
 20 October 1992
 Quarterly Report
 None
 ARF, Ait Ditto'* office file*
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.3) #42001-Q4
Transmitul Letter for Quarterly Progrea* Report, Fourth Quarter 1992
Art Ditto, RPM, Peue AFB
Johanna Hunter, RPM, USEPA Region 1
Richard Peue, RPM, NHDES
19 January 1993
Trantmittal Letter and Quarterly Report
None
ARF, Art Ditto'* office file*
                                 t

PEA (6.3) #43 001-E.l
Quarterly Piogieu Report for Peate AFB
An Ditto, RPM, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, RPM, USEPA Region 1
Richard Peue, RPM, NHDES
26 April 1993
Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                     6.4 General Correspondence

PEA (6.4) #1 001-003
"Wetland* Application No. 89-1805"
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Service*, Water Supply and Pollution Control Division
State of New Hampshire
14 September 1989
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #2 001-001
"Re<]ueet for information for wetlands peiuut
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Service*
Air Force
IS September 1989
Letter
None
ARF
                                t
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxLapd
                              D-60
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TRIE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.4) *3 001-001  .
 •Lawr raeardiof tfa* approval of p*rmit No. WPP-3341 for Landfill 5
 Statt of Now HaoMhin, Department of EoviroomMal ScnrieM
 Air Face*
 11 October 1919
 NOM
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.4) t4 001-005
 'Air Fore* Latter to the Wetland* Board retaroHnf t requeat for approval for t modificatiao to *• wetlands permitted
 •cop* of work*
 Roy F. Waatoo, be.
 DaflMrt Downuif, Watbada Boari, Concord, NH
 NOM
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (6.4) IS 001-010
 •Lout to EPA rafartin* twckj
 US Daymuiau of Commrc*
 Air Fore* via US EPA
 7 Much 1990
id infonnttion on PMM Air Fore* B*M*
NOB*
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) #6 001-001
Fik 192-679; CERCLA R*ktad Ttopomy Fill of 2000 Squat* F«*t for W*U§ at PMM* AFB, NH
Knatfh N. Ka«atn«
NKDES
WottaadtBoud
P.O. Box 200*
Coocord, NH 03302-2008
Ait Ditto, PMM AFB
26 May 1992
Nom
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) «S 001-019
Lab mutt* of grouadwMar MrnpU* fa
NHDBS
AnDino, PMMAFB
11 Fitauuy 1993
UMTW/I
NOM
ARF
       utorinj w«lb 05-5113,05-6101, and 01-6024.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (6.4) 19 001-041
Quaflaciy Pro«nat Report, Pviod of Parfcrmuc* July, Aufuat and S*pMmb« 1993
Roy F. Warn**, be.
USAF
Oetob«1993
Rapon
NOM
ARF (Swtioo 6.4 Binder)
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\iooelrodapd
                            D-61
                                                 07/14/95

-------
                                              7.1  Enforcement History

 •NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                           7.2 Endangenaent Assessments

 'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                             73  AdiiiiiihtnUiTe Orders

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (7-3) *1  001-H.3
 LONG TITLE:             Peaie AFB Federal Facilities Agreement Modification
 AUTHOR:                USAF
 RECIPIENT:              Peaie AFB
                        EPA Region 1
                        NHDES
                        NH Attorney General
 DATE:                   January 1993
 TYPE:                   FFA Modification
 SECOND REFERENCE:     none
 LOCATION:              ARF
                                               7.4 Consent Decrees

'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN TEDS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                                  IS Affidarits

'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                               7.6 Documentation of Technical Discussions / Response Actions

»NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME


                                         7.7 Notices, Letters, and Responses

'NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TTME
   MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro4apd                   D-62                                          07/14/95

-------
                                          8.1 ATSDKB*
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE.
 LOCATION:
 PEA (S.I) tl 001-B1
 buiallttion RMKHMMI
, Su«
PMM AFB, NH, Vohn» I Draft
 Roy F. WMton, be.
 USAF
 Stptutor 1991
 HMttfa,
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                     8J Toxkaloiical Prate

PEA (8 .2) #1 001-ZN4
InHilhrtffti RMMMtion Pragnm Stif* 4 Toxicity Profito*. PMM Air Fore* Buc, NH 03803
Roy F. WMUD, be.
USAF
Juauiy 1993
Toneity Profilw
Noo»
ARF, IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                    8J

PEA (8.3) *1 001-001
HMtth AiMunwatSpbt Simple
NHDES
ArtDiBo, PMM AFB
26 July 1991
PEA (6.4)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (8.3) ti 001-001
HMhh AiMinmm RMOB for PMM AFB
USAF
AT3DR
MulSlopE'32
1600 Clifton RMd
Attantt, GA. 30333
26Juatl992
NOM
ARF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelro(Upd
                           D-63
                                                 07/14/95

-------
                                                 9.1 Notices Issued
 * NOTE:  NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
                                                9.2 Findings of Fact
•NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                            93 Reports

PEA (9.3) #1 001-015
Landfill 5 Closure WetUndi Assessment tnd Mitigation Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Landfill5
ARF (LF-5 Shelf)
                                #
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                     9.4  General Correpoadence

PEA (9.4) f\ 001-001
Landfill 5 Wetlands Assessment and Mitigation Report
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
3 December 1993
Letter
LF-5
ARF (Section 9.4 Binder)
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro(tapd
                                                     D-64
                                                                              07/14/95

-------
                                          W.I
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:    PEA (10.1) f 1 001405
 LONG TITLE:            '•T*—* *•*
 AUTHOR:               Roy F. WMMO, be.
 RECIPIENT:             Air Fore*
 DATE:                 7 F*bniuy 1991
 TYPE:                  LMUr/RMpaawtoComnMau
 SECOND REFERENCE:     Noo*
 LOCATION:             ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10.1) 12 001-003
LONOTTTLE:            Dnft CoamunV RdMiaw Pita Conmati
AUTHOR:               Richard PMM, P.E.
                       RPM, NHDES
RECIPIENT:             Arthur Ditto, Pi.
                       RPM, U.S. Air Fate*
DATE:                  30 NovwtMr 1990
TYPE:                  LMMrCoooMBR^oit
SECOND REFERENCE:     Community RclMnai
LOCATION:             ARF
                                                     *

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10.1) 13 001-010
LONG TITLE:            EPA Region 1 Common to OtP Dnft Community lUUtkxu PUn; PWM AFB
AUTHOR:               Doiiflu S. OuBo
                       U.S. EPA R*ian 1
                       Supwftmd Community lUUtiou
RECIPIENT:             Arthur Ditto, RPM
                       U.S. Air Fan*
                       PMMAFB
DATE:                  7 Dwwmtxr 1990
TYPE:                  LMttr CoamMOt lUport
SECOND REFERENCE:     Coemunity R^Mioni
LOCATION:             ARF
                                                     *

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10.1) 14 001-011
LONG TITLE:             EPA fi«m«
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                         25 March 1991
                         Community ReUtiom
                         ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                         PEA (10.1) #7001-003
                         Comment* Remaining Unresolved for Stage 4 Work Plan Analysis Method
                         Mark McKenzie, Peaie AFB
                         Lee dePenia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
                         05 May 1991
                         Comment*
                         PEA {3-D
                         ARF
                                                         #

                         PEA (10.1) #8 001-002
                         Ovenight Comment* on the Soil Boring/Piezometer Instillation Program
                         Scott Doane
                         John Regan
                         NHDES
                         Arthur Ditto, P.E.
                         RPM, U.S. Air Force
                         Peaae AFB
                         13 April 1992
                         Letter
                         CRD-1
                         ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                         PEA (10.1) #9 001-002
                         Preliminary Aaaeaament/She Inspection Draft Fact Sheet Comments
                         Richard Peaae, NHDES
                         Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
                         17 April 1992
                         Comments
                         PEA (10.6); PEA (6.3)
                         ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                         PEA (10.1) #12 001-003
                         Review Comments tor Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum Number 2
                         Richard H. Peaae, P.E.
                         RPM, NHDES
                         Arthur Ditto, P.E.
                         RPM, USAF
                         Pease AFB
                         08 May 1992
                         Latter
                         PEA (3 .3)
                         ARF
                                                         f

                         PEA (10. I) «3 001-014
                         Review Comments for Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum Number 2
                         Michael Daly
                         U.S. EPA Region 1
                         Federal Facilities Superfund Section
                         Arthur Ditto, RPM
                         U.S. Air Force
                         Peas* AFB
                         14 May 1992
                         Transnntul Sheet, Letter and Comment Report
                         PEA (3.1); PEA (3 .3)
                         ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.0W\zonelnxl.apd
                                                      D-66
                                                                                                      07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:

 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                                                          r 2 for PMM AFB
PEA (10.1) *14 001-013
Review of Stag* 4 Work PUa tod Samplinf ind Antlytu PUn i
MkhMlI. DOy
U.S. EPA Region 1
Federal FacUibM Superftiad Section
Arthur Dine, RPM
U.S. Air Fone/Feue AFB
14Miy 1992
Leoar with Comment Report
PEA (3.1); PEA (3.3)
ARF
                              *
 PEA (10.1)122 001-006
 Inuw Neediag RMohnioii tot the Draft Final Remedial Invwtijation Report for Ludfitt 5, Dued April 1992
 USAF
 Johanna Hunter, USEPA
 28 July 1992
 ReeponMto Couuuenu
 Landfills
 ARF
                              t
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONO TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1)127001-002
Sttf* 4 Work PUB Addendum 3 R«vww CommMM
Richud PMM, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, PMM AFB
MAu|u«1992
PEA(6J)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONO TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) *30 001-002
lUvww Commnu of Drift Landfill 5 Soure* Am Prapood PUa
Ricbtid H. PMM, P.E.
RPM, NHDES
Arthur Dtoo, P.E.
RPM, USAF
PMM AFB
10 SMtMtfMT 1992
LF-5; PEA (4.3)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) 135 001-001
RWMW CcogMBM for Ludfill 3
Ricferd H. PMM, P.E.
RPM, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, P.E.
RPM, USAF
PMM AFB
2Oaobwl992
                        No Further Action Decision Docui
ZOMI
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
PEA (10.1)136 001-001
Review Conanerti for Landfill 3 (IRP Sitt 3)
Richard H. PMM, P.E.
RPM, NHDES
Arthur Dioo, P.E.
RPM, NHDES
PMM AFB
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zoaelro
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 2 October 1992
 Lasts
 Zone I
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.1) #40 001-006
 Response to Comment*, Suge 4 Work Han tnd Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 2
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 U.S. Air Force
 Pease AFB
 Johanna. Hunter, RPM
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
         and
 Richard Pease, RPM
 NHDES
 3 November 1992
 PEA (3.3); PEA (3.1)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTrTLE:
 AUTHOR:

 RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.1) *41 001-002
 EPA Review of IRP Stage 4, No Further Action Decision Document (NFADD) for Site 3
 Johanna Hunter, RPM
 U.S. EPA Region 1
 Arthur Ditto, RPM
 U.S. Air Force
 Pease AFB
 S November 1992
She 3
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) #44 001-002
Review of Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3, Pease AFB
Michael J. Daly
U.S. EPA, Region 1
Federal Facilities Superfund Section
Arthur Ditto, P.E.
RPM, U.S. Air Force
Pease AFB
23 November 1992
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10. 1) *48 001-003
Review Comments of Stage 4, She Characterization Summary, IRP Zone 1
Richard H. Pease, P.E.
RPM, NHDES
Aitfnir Ditto, P.Ł.
RPM, U.S. Air Force
Pease AFB
1 December 1992
Letter CoosmBflt Report
LF-4; Zone 1; LF-2
ARF
                                f
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodjipd
                              D-68
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.1) 150 001404
 lUviewof Zoo* 1, Sbe Oiaracterizalioc Summary for P*aa* AFB, October 1992
 MMfcaeU. Dary
 U.S. EPA, Region 1
 Federal FacilitiM Superfund Swoon
 Arthur Dido, P.E.
 RPM, USAF
 PMMAFB
 9 December 1992
Zoo* 1; PEA (3.5)
ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) 151 001-004
Review of the Zonal Sit* Characterization Summary feu PMM AFB
Michael). Daly
U.S. EPA, Ration 1
Fec^Fecilitie. Superfund Section
Arthur Ditto, RPM
U.S. Air Fan*
PMMAFB
9 December 1992
Letter wim Comment Report
Zoml
ARF
                               t
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1)153 001-004
EPA Review of IRP LF-5, Drift PropoMd PUn, November 1992
lohanoi Mutter, RPM
U.S. EPA, Region 1
Arthur Ditto, RPM
USAF, PMM AFB
17 December 1992
LF-5; PEA (43)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1)*54 001-002
Review CoaaDeaa/PMM
Rkturd H. PMM, P.E
RPM.NHDES
Arthur Ditto, P.E.
RPM , U.S. Air Force
PMMAFB
4J«nuryl993
Letter Report
Site 46
ARF
i AFB RtUroed Tnek (She 46) Site InvMtintion
Report
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) fSS 001-002
Reepott* to Comments, LF-5 Drift Proposed PUn and Feet Sheet
Arthur Ditto, RPM
U.S. Air Force
Johum Hunter, RPM
U.S. EPA, Region 1
5 January 1993
LF-5
ARF
    MK01\rOT:00628026.004\zonelrodapd
                             D-69
                                                                                                    07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.1) fn 001-001
 Siem Club Comments on Cleanup of Site 5 u Pease Air Force Bue
 Scott Diummey, Siem Club
 USAF
 15 February 1993

 Landfills
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10. 1)*74 001-002
 Proposed Plan for IPR Site 5, Landfill 5, Source Area
 Seacoast Citizens Oveneeing Pease Environment (SCOPE)
 USAF
 22 January 1993 •

 Landfills
 ARF
                                 t
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (io. nm 001-023
 Review of the Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Zone 1, Initial Screening of Alternatives Report, Pease AFB
 USEPA, Region 1
 USAF
 27 August 1993
 Comments
 PEA (10.10); Zone 1
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                f

 PEA (10.1) #84001-018
 Response to EPA Comments on the Zone 1 Draft Remedial Investigation Report
 USAF
 EPA
 IS October 1993
 Response to Comments
 Zonel
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (10.1) «5 001-018
Response to NHDES Comments on the Zone 1 Draft Remedial Investigation Report
USAF
NHDES
15 October 1993
Response to Comments
Zone 1; PEA (10.10)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                i

PEA (10.1) *M 001-015
Response to the EPA Comments on the Zone 1 Draft FS Report
USAF
EPA
29 November 1993
Response to Comments
Zooel
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                t

PEA (10.1) *87 001-018
Response to NHDES Comments on the Zone 1  Draft FS Report
USAF
NHDES
    MK01\RPT:00628Q26.004\zonelradJipd
                              D-70
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 30 November 1993
 Reeponee to Comment!
 ZOM!
 ARF (Section 10.1 Kate)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.1)1107 001-001
 Raepoan to NHDES CommMU on the 30 % Submtaul of the Remedial Detifn for tfa* Landfill 5 Fuul Clown Sy Mm
 USAF
 NHDES
 3 November 1993
 Reeponee 10 Commeotl
 LendfiUS
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                               I
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.1) 110$ 001-004
 Reeponee 10 EPA <
 USAF
 EPA
 3 November 1993
 ReepOMetol
on the 30% Subnteal of the Remedial Daeifn for the Landfill 5 Final Clown SyMm
ARF (SMion 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) f 109 001-006
Reaponie ID NHDES Common on the 90% Submtaal of th. 1
WtM, SoU tad Scdanou; LudfiUs 2, 4, and 5
USAF
NHDES
3NovMnb*rl993
KMpOflM tO COttOMOtC
Landfill 2; Landfill 4; Landfill 5
ARF (SMbon 10.1 Biadv)
                                 ago far mt Exeavaoon/Rdocatioo Plan for
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) fl 16 001-403
Review of U.S. EavirooBUttl ProMction Aj«cy
FfM Pfioa* Mittv Cotpucalion
Ma>or ChaiU. Howdl, AFCEE
11 June 1993
               Commtntt on Backfround Data for PMM AFB, NH
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.1) fill001-004
PMT Rmiw of labal Scntmaf of AlMnativM, Zoo* 1, PMM AFB, NH
Fnd Priw, Mim Coqranoon
Major CharlM HowWl, AFCEE
16 Jury 1993
    1
ARF (SMbon 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (10.1) #130001-005
Review of *• Air Fore* buullitioo R*
NH
EPA
USAF
                   , Zoo* 1 Initial Scmunf of AfcaraativM Repon, Peat* AFB.
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelRxUpd
                            D-71
                                                     07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 27 Augutt 1993
 Letter with Attachment
 Zoael
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:'
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.1) #121 001-012
 Peue AFB Zone 1 Drift Feasibility Study Review Comments
 NHDES
 USAF
 1 October 1993
 Letter with Attachments
 Zonel
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                I

 PEA (10.1) #126 001-002
 EPA Review of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook Sediment Evaluation Work Plan
 EPA
 USAF
 16 November 1993
 Fax
 None
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                #

 PEA (10.1) #129 001-010
 Pease AFB Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation Review Comments
 NHDES
 USAF
 29 November 1993
 ConHDCOtS
 Zonel
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                #

 PEA (10.1) #131 001-002
 Work Plan to Evaluate the Sfdunfitti of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook Review Comments
 NHDES
 USAF
 29 November 1993

 Zone 3
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                #

 PEA (10.1) #134 001-003
 Pease AFB Zone 1 Feasibility Study Report Draft Final Review Comments
 NHDES
 USAF
 3 January 1994
 Conuncott
 Zonel   -
 ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                #

 PEA (10.1) #136 001-010
 Pease AFB, Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation
 NHDES
 USAF
29 November 1993
Review Comments
Zone 1; PEA (3.6)
ARF (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                t
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodapd
                                                      D-72
                                                                              07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.2) H 001-040

 Roy F. WOMB, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES, USAF
 January 1991
 Community Relation! Plan
 NOM
 ARF.IR
ma Community Ralaboni Plan*
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.2) fl 001-0*0
 U.S. Air Fore* toaullatio.
 DyMOMC CofpucMou
 230 Paachtra* St. N.W.. Si*. 500
 Atlanta, GA 30303
 USAF
 July 1993
 CRP
 NOM
 ARF
      i Program Community Ralatjoni PUn for Paaa* AFB, NH Interim Final
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE.
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                        MJ FaMk Notice

PEA (10.3) II 001-001
Pud Advwtiaamant of January 27, 1993 Public Hearing on PrapOMd Plan for Landfill 5 Soure* Ana
USAF
Foatr'i Daify Dtmocrar, PubBe
23 January 1993
PubbeNotie.
NOM
ARF.IR
                               *

PEA (10 J)«2 001-001
Paid AdvMWWMBt of January 27, 1993 Public Haarmf for Propoaad Plan tot Landfill 5 SOUR* Ana
USAF
fVfumum* HmU, Public
24 January 1993
Public Notio.
NOM
ARF.IR
                               t

PEA (10 J)« 001-001
Pud AdvattiaaoMt in Feaer't Daily Democrat tor Landfill 5 Rwind PrapcMd PUn Publk CemoM Pniod and Public
USAF
Foatr't Daify Danaem, Public
31 July 1993
PubBeNotic*
LF-2. LF-4, LF-5
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE.

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (10 J)M 001-001
Paid AdvtcMamg in Pommaah Htroid for Landfill 5 Rcviaad Prapoaad Plan Public Comnant Pariod and Public
Haarins
USAF
forometok HtroU, Public
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apd
                            D-73
                                                     07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 1 August 1993
 Public Notice
 LF-2, LF-4, LF-5
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                     10.4 Public Meeting Transcripts

 PEA (10.4) #1 001-052
 Pease Ail Force Bate, New Hampshire Official Transcript of Public Hearing for Proposed Plan for Landfill 5 Source Area
 R & R Associates
 P.O. Box 863
 Exter, NH 03833
 USAF
 27 January 1993
 Tnuucript
 Landfills
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
 PEA (10.4) fl 001-7.4
 Public Hearing Summary of Pease Air Force Base Public hearing on Landfill 5 Source Area Proposed Plan
 Dynamac Corporation
 230PeachtneSt., N.W.
 Suite 500
 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
 USAF
 27 January 1993
 Hearing Summary
 Landfills
 ARF, IR
                                 tt

 PEA (10.4) f3 001-025
 Pease Air Force Bate Public Workshop and Information Meeting: Installation Restoration Program
 Dynamac Corporation
 230PeachtreeSt., N.W.
 Suite 500
 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
 USAF
 12 January 1993
 Meeting Summary
 None
 IR
                                 I

 PEA (10.4) K 001-034
 Peese AFB Official Transcript of Public Hearing for Revised Proposed Plan for Landfill 5
 RftR Associates, Inc.
 USAF
 5 August 1993
Tnnscnpt
 LF-5
ARF (LF-5 Shelf)
                                 t

PEA (10.4)17001-8.3
Final Summary of Pease AFB Public Hearing on the Revised Proposed Plan for the landfill 5 Source Area and (he
Consolidation of T *nK*fifl* 2 and 4 Whhm t ^i^fin 5
Dy&amsc Corporation
USAF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJpd
                              D-74
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 5 Auf
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 25 July 1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5) *5 001-005
 Meeting ""T"»f of the Technical Review Committee
 Department of the Air Force
 S«e Diftribution List
 29 Augutt 1990
 Meeting Minute*
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5) ft 001-012
 Meeting minutei of the Technical Review Committee
 Department of the Air Force
 See Distribution Lift
 26 September 1990
 Meeting Minutei
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) 17 001-008
Meeting minutei of me Technical Review Committee
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution Lilt
31 October 1990
Meeting Minute*
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                 #

PEA (10.5) #8 001-004
Meeting minutei of the Technical Review Committee
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution Lilt
29 November 1990
Meeting Minutei
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                 #

PEA (10.5) t9 001-003
Meeting minutei of the Technical Review Committee
Department of the Air Force
See Diftribution Lilt
31 January 1991
Meeting Minutei
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                 *

PEA (10.5) 1 10 001-003
Meeting tni«mt»« of the Technical Review Committee
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution Lin
27 March 1991
Meeting Minutei
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
    MKDl\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10-5)f 11 001-006
 LONG TITLE:              Muting minmei of me TechmceJ Review Commne*
 AUTHOR:                Deputmemofn* Air Force
 RECIPIENT:               See Distribution Lid
 DATE:                   24 April 1991
 TYPE:                   Meeting Minute*
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Noo.
 LOCATION:               ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                                        *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10.5) f 12 001-003
 LONG TITLE:              Meeting minute* of the Technicel Review Commne*
 AUTHOR:                Depenmentof (he Air Force
 RECIPIENT:               See Dutribution Lut
 DATE:                   2S M*y 1991
 TYPE:                   Meeting Minute.
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Noo*
 LOCATION:               ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                                        I

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (10.5) #13 001-006
 LONG TITLE:              Meeting minuc** of me Technical Review CommiBee
 AUTHOR:                Department of tb« Air Fore.
 RECIPIENT:               See Dutributioa Lut
 DATE:                   23 June 1991
 fypg.                   Meeting MinubM
 SECOND REFERENCE:      None
 LOCATION:               ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                                       #

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (10.5) #14 001-007
 LONG TITLE:              Meeting Minute, of Technical Review Committee
 AUTHOR:                 USAF
 RECIPIENT:              See Distribution Lift
 DATE:                   30 July 1991
 TYPE:                  Meeting Minute*
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Noo*
 LOCATION:               ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10.5) f IS 001-007
LONOTTTLE:             Meeting MinuM* of Techaic*! Review ComnBOM
AUTHOR:                USAF
RECIPIENT:              See Dumbubon Lift
DATE:                   27 AafUt 1991
TYPE:                   MeetiasMinMw
SECOND REFERENCE:     None
LOCATION:              ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10 S) nt 001-010
LONO TITLE:             Meeting Matte* of Technwel Review Comma**
AUTHOR:                USAF
RECIPIENT:              See Dutribuboo Lift
DATE:           -       01 October 1991
TYPE:                   Meetittf MUM**
SECOND REFERENCE:     None
LOCATION:              ARF (Seetion 10.5 Binder)
                                                       f

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (10.5) #17 001-003
LONG TITLE:             Meeting Minute* of Technical Review Commmet
AUTHOR:                USAF
RECIPIENT:              Se* DiMribution Lift
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelio
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 29 October 1991
 Meeting Minutes
 Nose
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5) #18 001-013
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 26 November 1991
 Meeting Minute*
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                 #

 PEA (10.5) #19 001-005
 Meeting Minute* of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 07 January 1992
 Meeting Minute*
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #20 001-003
Meeting Minute* of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
31 March 1992
Meeting Minute*
Noae
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                *

PEA (10.5) *21 001-002
Meeting Minute* of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
28 April 1992
Meeting Minute*
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                It

PEA (10.5) 122 001-003
Meeting Minute* of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
20 May 1992
Meeting Minute*
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                #

PEA (105) #23 001-003
Meeting Minute* of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
28 Jury 1992
Meeting Minute*
None
Environmental Division File Room - Technical Review Committee File
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxUpd
                              D-78
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
  PEA (10.5) «4 001-005
  Media* MiaMM of Technical Review Commaee
  USAF
  SeeDbttibutianLiK
  29 September 1992
  Meeting Miautei
  Nan*
  ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                t
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (10.5) 125 001-013
  Meeting Minute, of Technical Review Commme.
  USAF
  SeeDietribulioaLiK
  27 October 1992
  Meeting Mimim
  None
  ARF (Swtmn 10 J Baxter)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (10.5) 126 001-004
  MMting Minutx of Ttchnieil R«vww Commituc
  USAF
  SMDiMributiaoLuc
  16 Pioimtir 1982
  MMiafMiiMM
  Noo*
  ARF (S«aoo 103 Binder)
                                *
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (10.5) 127 001-003
  MMtiQf MiauM of Ttcfamctl R«VMW CommtOM
  USAF
  TRCDuBftutiooLut
  17 Fcbniuy 1992
  ARF (S»etioa 10.5 Bindv)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (10.5)121001403
  Mining Hii»«M of Technical Review Committe
  USAF
  TRCDt«ribu6coLu<
  23Metebl9»3
  ARF (Sectkn 10 J Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONOTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
  PEA (103)129 001406
  Mining Mianei of Technical Review Committee
  USAF
  TRCDjettnutionLut
  27 April 1993
  Meeting Minuet
  None
  ARF (Section 103 Binder)
                                *

  PEA (10.5) 130 001406
  Meeting Minutei of Technical Review Commhue
  USAF
  TRCDiMribubonLut
    MK01\RPT:0062
4\zonelrwUpd
D-79
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:  .
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 25M«y 1993
 Meeting Minute*
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5) #31 001-012
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 TRC Distribution Lilt
 29 July 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                 #

 PEA (10.5) #32 001-002
 Meeting Minutes of Technictl Review Committee
 USAF
 TRC Distribution List
 27 Jury 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5) #33 001-008
 Meeting Minutes of the Technics! Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 31 August 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                 If

 PEA (10.5) #34 001-009
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 28 September 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10 J) #35 001-010
Technics! RgVM'w Committw Milling Minute*
USAF
See Distribution List
26 October 1993
Meeting Mattes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) #36 001-011
Technical Review Committee Meeting Minutes
USAF
See Distribution ^ T**
30 November 1993
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                                #
    MKQl\RFT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) «37 001-002
Technical Review Coma*** Meeting Minute*
USAF
See Dieaibuboa Lift
11 January 1994
Meeting MinuM
Nona
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                               »
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT.
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) 131001-003
Meeting Mima** of Technical Review Counitte
USAF
TRC Dietributioa Lut
1 Much 1994
Meeting MinuM
Noot
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
                               I
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.5) 139 001-012
MMtinf MUMM of Technical Review Commim*
USAF
TRC Duoifautioa Lin
26 April 1994
MMaif MiniM*
Naa>
ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                                      Fact AMU, PnHAe>iioriN,MdNtwt
PEA (10.6) *1 001-003
"N«w
              tiat *• iov«««if«tioo of 22 HIM on PMM AFB*
U.S. Ail Fore.
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTirLE.
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) 12 001-002
U.S. Air Fore*
Ma.
21!
Noa*
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) 13001-003
*N«wi f»l«>»» rafardiof A* uad*r|rouod w«t« unpliaf frognm"
U.S. Air Fore*
M*di*
29 Novwabtr 19SS
NOM
ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\ionelro«Upd
                            D-81
                                                                                                 07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE.
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.fi) 14 001-002
 "Newi releaie regarding the releue of the third interim technical report*
 U.S. Air Force
 Media
 22 March 1989
 News Releaie
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.6) ft 001-002
 'News releaie regarding drum removal at Landfill S*
 U.S. Air Force
 Media
 1989
 Newt Releaie
 None
 ARF
                                 i

 PEA (10.6) #7 001-003
 'Superfund Program Draft Interagency Agreement Fact Sheet*
 U.S. EPA, Region I
 See Mailing List
 December 1990
 Fact Sheet
 None
 ARF
                                 i

 PEA (10.6) «8 001-008
 Pease Air Force Baae Installation Restoration Program Update: Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
 USAF
 1991 Mailing List
 October 1991
 Fact Sheet
 None
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE-
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) 19 001-011
Peaae Air Force Baae Installation Restoration Program Update: Information Update
USAF
1992 Mailing List
December 1992
Fact Sheet
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) *12 001-008
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update: Proposed Plan tor Landfill 5 Source Area
USAF  "
1993 Mailing List
January 1993
Fact Sheet
LF-5
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (10.6) 113 001-006
Peue Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update: Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation
USAF
1993 Mailing List
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\ionelrodapd
                              D-82
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 January 1993
 FM Sheet
 Now
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.6) f 14 001-002
 Newa Release 93-01- Comment Period Open* for Propoaed Plan on Landfill 5 Source Ana
 USAF
 All Local Newa Media - Radio, Pnaa, TV
 15 January 1993
 Newt Ralaaia
 PEA (44)
 ARF, IR
                              *

 PEA (10.6) f II 001-OM
 Reviled Propoead Plan fcr Landfill 5 Source Area and the Plan to ConwJidate Landfill* 2 and 4 Within Landfill 5
 USAF
 Sea Mailing Lin
 July 1993
 Fact Sheet
 LF-2, LF-4, LF-5 .
 ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)
                              t

 PEA (10.6) f 19 001-002
 Newa Releaaa. Final  Plan* Iteuad for Cleanup of Two Site* at Peaae AFB
 USAF
27 September 1993
Newa Raleaae
LF-5; She 34
ARF (SMion 10.6 Bindw)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) 120 001-004
PaawAFB]
USAF
SM Mailing Li*
January 1994
NawikMMr
Noaw
ARF (Section 10.6 Bindac)
rVohnwl.Numbvl
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.6) f24 001-004
PatMAFB]
USAF
cVonmal.NuaibaTZ
April 1994
QuatMrtyN*
Nona
ARF (SMbeo 10.6 Biadar)
                                          U.T
'NOTE; NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
 NOTE! NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zoDelrcxUpd
                            D-83
                                                 07/14/95

-------
                                          10.9 Technical Renew Committee Charter

 * NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN TEDS SECTION AT IBIS TIME
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                         10.10  Correspondence

 PEA (10.10) #1001-001
 'Letter regarding concern about the hazardous waste sites at Pease AFB"
 Gordon J. Humphrey, U.S. Senate
 James F. McGovern, Acting Secretary of the Air Force
 24 Much 1989
 Letter
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10. 10) #2001-002
 "Letter regarding the migration of Air Force hazardous waste beyond the Pease AFB perimeter"
 Town of Newington
 Robert Field, Environmental Cleanup Advisory Committee, Portsmouth. NH
 11 May 1990
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10. 10) #3 001-008
"Letter regarding groundwater sampling conducted on private property"
Department of the Air Force
Will Gilbert, Newington, NH
6 June 1989
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (10.10) #4 001-001
Subminal Letter for Draft Community Relations Plan for the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR) on Cape Cod,
Massachusetts
Douglas S. Outro, USEPA
Karen Cowdea,
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
19 June 1990
Letter
None
ARF
                                 #

PEA (10.10) K 001-002
Impact of Baa* Closure on Personnel Responsible for the Installation Restoration Program and Public Affairs
Merrill S. Hohman, USEPA
Col. Jamea R. Wilson
Pease AFB, NH
27 August 1990
Letter
None
ARF
                                 #

PEA (10.10) #6 001-001
Impact of Base Closure on Personnel Responsible for the Installation Restoration Program and Public AfEain (Your Letter,
August 27, 1990)
USAF
Merrill S.  Hohman, USEPA
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apd
                               D-84
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                        11 October 1990
 Now
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.10) fl 001-001
 Submrial of Primary DoeunMnu (Community Relation! PUn)
 USAF
 Jim Brown, USEPA
 24 October 1990
 PEA (10.2)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.10) ft 001-001
 Subtotal of Primuy Documnti (Co
 USAF
 Richard PMM, NHDES
 24 October 1990
        BtyR.
i PUn)
 PEA (10.2)
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #9 001401
Community Relaooat Plan D«
USAF
Johumi Hunur, USEPA
17 lawny 1991
tlopi
PEA (10.2)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE.
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) f 10 001-001
fommmiHy ReltHn
USAF
Richard PMM, NHDES
17jMMuyl991
PEA (10.2)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) 111 001-001
Submhul of Draft Fml Primuy Document!
USAF
Richard FMM, NHDES
5 February 1991
PEA (3.1); PEA (3.3)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR.
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) 112 001-001
Submhttl of Drift Foul Primuy Documntt
USAF
Johtnnt HUM, USEPA
5 Fdmury 1991
PEA (3.1); PEA (3.3)
ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (10.10) #13 001-001
 Community Relation! PUn
 USAF
 Johanna Hunter, USEPA
 12 April 1991
 Letter
 PEA (10.2)
 ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10. 10) #14 001-004
Basewide ARARi Pease AFB, NH 03803, January 1993, DRAFT - Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Peaie AFB
1 April  1993
Letter
PEA (4.1)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.10) #19 001-005
Draft Record of Decision for Landfill 5 Source Area Remedial Action, April 1993  - Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
11 May 1993
Letter
LF-5
ARF
                                If

PEA (10.10) *20 001-002
Peaae AFB Review of Landfill S Draft Record of Decision
Johanna Hunter, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
13 May 1993
Faxed Letter
LF-5
ARF
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apd
                             D-86
07/14/95

-------
                                          11.1
 'NOTE;
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11.l)f 1001-003
 Rill  fLiimnnnl  luuc  Piper for C*rcinof«niciry Chinctwizttioa for TrichloroMhytow (CASRN  79-01-6),
 TcncUoroidiylm* (CASRN 127-18-4), tod Sryrta* (CASRN 100-42-5)
 USEPA
 USAF
 14 Jury 1992
 Now
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11.1)12001-0.2
 Drift GuidioM on Pnpviof Supvrfuod Dcciooo Documents: Th« Proposed Plan tad Record of Decision
 Office of EnMiency* Remedial Redman, EPA, Wedunfion, DC
 USAF
 Mochl9U
 Ouiduie*
 NOM
 Ait'iOffiM
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11.1)13001-8.9
 TiMRPMPriiMr. An teroductory Quid* todw RoUtnd RMpomibUitiM of th« Supwftiad R«Mdul Pn>)«t
 Office of EmciMcy tod RMMdul RMpoot, EPA, Wufaiafuo, DC
 USAF
 S*pmriwrl987
 Oiudiae*
 NOM
 Ait'iOfBc*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONO TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #4 001-11.1
CERCLA Sit* DuenpuKM* to POTWi Ouid«ne« Manul
OfBe*ofEmM|MeyiDdR«iMdulRMponM,EPA,
USAF
Aufiuil990
NOB*
Art's Offic*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1)*5 001-041
FnoMrwoct for Ecolofiol Risk Aii>iim«m
EPA
USAF
F*niuyl992
Ait'i Offic*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) M001-E.1
Pralinmuy AmnmiBt Guidanc* Fuul Y*«r 19S8
Otto of Emanocy md Rwndiil R«poa««. EPA. Wubiafton, DC
USAF
Jamiuy 19M
OuMboc*
NOD.
Alt'* Office
                               I
    NCK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrodJpd
                            D-87
07/14/9$

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11. l)*7001-G.l
 Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook (Interim Version)
 Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
 USAF
 1988
 Guidance
 None
 Art'i Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA(11.1)#8001-H.6
 Summary Report on Issues in Ecological Risk Assessment
 EPA
 USAF
 February 1991
 Guidance
 None
 Art's Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11.1) #9 001-127
 Technology Screening Guide for Treatment of CERCLA Soils and Sludges
 EPA
 USAF
 September 1988
 Guidance
 None
 Art's Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA(11.1)#10001-F.19
Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA - Interim Final
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
October 1988
Guidance
None
Art's Office
                                 I

PEA (11. 1)11 1001-103
Final Guidance on Administrative Records for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
1190/91
Guidance
None
Art's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (11. 0*12001-8.2
Implementing EPA's Groundwater Protection Strategy for the 1990's: Draft Comprehensive State Groundwater Protection
Program Guidance
EPA
USAF
1992
Guidance
None
Art's Office
                                i

PEA (11. 1)>13 001-021
A Handbook for State Groundwater Managers
Office of Water, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
    MKQl\RPT:00628026.004\zonelrod.apd
                              D-88
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 May 1992
 None
 Att'i Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:

 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #14 001-3.40
Conducting Remedial Inveetifa
                        iou/Feasibility Studiee for CERCLA Municipal LiodfiU Shu
 Office of Emergency and Remedial Ropoow, EPA, Wuhington, DC
 USAF
 February 1991
 Guidance
 None
 Art'i Office
                                t
 PEA(11.1)#15001-F.2
 Guidance on Preparim Supi
                     rftndDe
i Documents: The Propoeed Plan, Tfat Record of Dectrion, and Explanation
 of Sijnifie«« DifhraaoM, Th« Rwocd of D«a«oo AawBdmnt
 OfBe*ofEiMq«wyuidR«i»dulR«paaM, EPA, Wuhinjton, DC
 USAF
 July 1989
 Guidance
 None
 Alt'i Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11.1) #16001-8.12
 Riifc Annimmt Ouidino for Supertmd Voium* I: Huaum Heath Evthiirioa Miimil (Put A) Imrirn Foal
 Office of EoMffeacy ud Remedial Reepome, EPA, Waduoftoo, DC
 USAF
 December 19S9
 Guidance
 None
 Aft't Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
PEA (11.1) #17 001-057
Riak Amnmenr Guidance for Superftiod Volume U:  Environmental Evaluation Menial Interim Final
Office of Emergency and Remedial Reepome, EPA, Wariuagtoa, DC
USAF
Man* 1989
Guidance
None
Art's Office
                               #

PEA (11.1)#U Deleted
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE.
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.1) #19001-8.2
                                      i Guidance
EPA
USAF
December 1990
None
Alt'i Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
PEA (11.1) #20001-G
RCRA Orientation Manual
EPA
USAF
1990
    MK01\RFT:0062S026.004\a3iielnxLapd
                             D-89
                                                                           07/14/95

-------
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                        Guidance
                        None
                        Art's Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONOTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                        PEA (11. 1)«1 001-295
                        The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles
                        EPA
                        USAF
                        November 1991
                        Guidance
                        None
                        Art's Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                        PEA (11.1) #22 001-017
                        Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated Site Clean-Up Technologies
                        EPA
                        USAF
                        May 1991
                        Guidance
                        None
                        Art's Office
                                                        I

                        PEA (11.1) #23 001-023
                        Bibliography  of Federal Reports and Publications Describing Alternatives and Innovative Treatment Technologies for
                        Corrective Action and Site Remediation
                        EPA
                        USAF
                        May 1991
                        Guidance
                        None
                        Art's Office
                                                        I
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                        PEA (11. 1)124 001-1 11
                        Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies
                        EPA
                        USAF
                        May 1991
                        None
                        Art's Office
•NOTE:
                                              11 J EPA Reffcsul Guidance

                GndaiKedocaMatsBstedttbibliogniilikMarcesforadoc^
                         n OB notx*
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                        PEA (11.2I#1 001-C.l
                        Land Disposal Restrictions Summary of Requirements
                        EPA, Region 1
                        USAF
                        August 1990
                        Guidance
                        None
                        Art's Office
                                                        *
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
                        PEA (\l2)ti 001-107
                        Supplemental Risk AiiMirmnt Guidance for the Superfund Program
                        EPA, Region 1
                        USAF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelro
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 June 1919
 Guidance
 Nooe
 Alt'* Office
 'NOTE;
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                                               11J State

                                                    I for*
PEA (11.3) f 1001-001
ENC-WS 410 Groundwater Protection Rule
NUDES
Alt Ditto, AFBDA
February IS, 1993
NOB*
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.3) C001-B.8
Interim Policy for the Management of Soib Co
NHDES
USAF
       •1991
I from SpiUi/Retaaae* of Viifin Petroleum Produeu
Noa*
Alt'l Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.3) #3 001-04*
Groundwater Protection Ruta
NHDES
USAF
Febniwy 1993
Ait'i Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONGTTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11J)«4 001-37.3
N«w huqnfain Rule* for (be Cootrol of RedtMioa
NHDES
USAF
April 1983
Art'« Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA(11J)*5001-C.15
Guidance Documea for the Clown of Solid Wane Landfills in New Hanpafcin
NHDES
USAF
May 1990
NOM
Ait'i Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA(11.3)«001-D.7
Guidebook for EnvironmeBUl Petmiti in New Hampahin
NHDES
USAF
    MK01\RPTK»628026.004\zonelro
-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                          1992
 None
 Art's Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONGTTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
                       11.4 Air Force Guidance

 PEA (11. 4) #1001-024
 'Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Peaie AFB, New Hampihiie*
 Mitre Corporation, Civil Systems Division
 Air Force
 20 June 1990
 Letter Report
 None
 ARF
                                 It

 PEA (11. 4) 12 001-016
 •Implementation of Department of Defense (DOD) policy guidance on IRP Policy No. 1 *
 Department of the Air Force
 See Distribution Lie
 11 December 1981
 Policy /Guidance Document
 None
 ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
PEA (11. 4) #3 001-002
'Implementation of DOD policy guidance on Installation Restoration Plan (IRP). Policy No. 1 '
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution Lilt
5 March 1982
Policy/Guidance Document
None
ARF
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11. 4) *4 001-003
'Relationship of the IRP to RCRA enforcement actions
Department of the Air Force*
See Distribution List
26 December 1985
Policy Document
None
ARF
                                 t

PEA (11.4) « 001-002
•Guidance for Air Force Installation Compliance with Volatile Organic Compound Regulations'
DepaftnMnt 01 the Air Force*
See Distribution List
8 October T986
Guidance Document
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
PEA (11. 4) *6 001-003
*IRP Decision Documentation Policy*
Departmectof the Air Force'
See Distribution Lilt
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zonelnxlaixl
                              D-92
07/14/95

-------
 DATE:                   25 Miy IMS
 TYPE:                   PofieyLana*
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Nona
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                        «

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (11.4) #7 001-003
 LONG TTTLE:              'RCRA Facility Anxnntnt Guidance to Innallation"
 AUTHOR:                 Dapanmaot of dw Air Fora"
 RECIPIENT:               Sw Diioibutioo Lut
 DATE:                   3 Aufiut 19U
 TYPE:                   Guidance
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Nan
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                        f

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (11.4) rt 001-003
 LONG TITLE:              'Guidance on O«M imp conaructioo and digitization P.O. 006 Peaaa AFB'
 AUTHOR:                 Department of til* Air Fore*'
 RECIPIENT:               Roy F. Weatta, Inc.
 DATE:                   6 Much 1919
 TYPE:                   QuMtM* DocunMot
 SECOND REFERENCE.      Now
 LOCATION:               ARF
                                                        *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (11.4) 19 001-1.3
 LONG TITLE:              Handbook to Support tfa* bMUlUtioo RMtonboa Pngnm i»*«im»i of Work for Rcmdul bvwti|«ion/F(MibUity
                         StudiwV«nna3.0
 AUTHOR:                 Air Fore* Occupation*! tad EavironmMUl HMbfa Ltbontory Twttaiol Sirvkw Divmoo
 RECIPIENT:               PMMAFB
 DATE:                   May 1919
 TYPE:                   Hudbook
 SECOND REFERENCE:      Norn
 LOCATION:               Art'. Offie*
                                                       *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (11.4) f 10 001 -B1.3
 LONGITTLE:              Unil«d SMM Air Fore* Eoviranmuul Rutonnion ProfiUB NFRAP Quid*: Making, Docun»ntinj »nd Ev.outinj No
                         Funhar RacpooM Action Plaaoad Dacisiooj - Final Draft
 AUTHOR:                 USAF
 RECIPIENT:               PMMAFB
 DATE:                   Fabrauy 1993
TYPE:                    GuiduM
SECOND REFERENCE:      Moo.
 LOCATION:               Art'.OfBc.
                                                       *

 DOCUMENT NUMBER:      PEA (11.4) fll 001-0*7
 LONG TITLE:              Air Fora Logittiei Command Public Affiun EnvnaaOMntal Guidance
 AUTHOR:                 USAF
RECIPIENT:               PMMAFB
DATE:                   Match 31. 19S9
TYPE:                    Ondaan
SECOND REFERENCE:      NOM
LOCATION:               Alt's Offic.
                                                       *

DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (11.4) 112 001-TX.A1.3
LONG TITLE:             Btnmmiaiiilail Suapbag Prooaduro
AUTHOR:                Air FOR* Oc«upttwoal a^ EoviionnMntal Haattfa Labonlory
RECIPIENT:
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\2onelnxL«pd                  D-93                                          07/14/95

-------
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 Match 1989
 Guidance
 None
 Alt'I Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA(11.4)«3001-J.2
 Report of the Defense Environmental Response Task Force
 Department of Defenie
 PeaaeAFB
 October 1991
 Guidance
 None
 Ait'i Office
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TTTLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11.4)4114 001-1.5
 Initiative* for Accelerating Cleanup at BRAC Installation!
 Department of Defenie
 PeaaeAFB
 June 1992
 Guidance
 None
 Art'i Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
PEA (11.4) t 15 -Deleted
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                        MS Technical Source

PEA (11. 5) f 1001-022
Trichloroechylene in the Groundwater Supply of Peaae Air Force Base Poittmouth, NH
U.S. Geological Survey
USAF
1982
Technical Source
None
Art'i Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TTTLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11. 5) 12 001-080
Geology and Gioundwater Resource* of Southeastern New Hampshire
U.S. Geological Survey
USAF
1964
Technical Source
None
Art's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.5) *3 001-010
Prelinnn«ry*Wedand Delineation and Evaluation Report for Pease Air Force Bate, NH - Draft
The Smart Associates, Environmental Consultants, Inc.
USAF
April 1990
Technical Source
None
Art's Office
    MK01\RFT:00628026.004\zonelnxUpd
                              D-94
07/14/95

-------
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
 AUTHOR:
 RECIPIENT:
 DATE:
 TYPE:
 SECOND REFERENCE:
 LOCATION:
 PEA (11.6) 11001-005
 •Rfck AMMMOt Dm Nwdt tod Stapling Proctdunt L«Mr Rtport'
 Roy F. W«MO, be
 EPA, NHDES
 S Much 1991
 Uttar Report
 Son*
 ARF
                               *
 PEA (11.6) 12 001-051
 "AMlytieal Method* Letter Ripoif - Supplcmenttl
 Roy F. Wtetoo, Inc.
 EPA, NHDES
 23 April 1991
 Letter Report
 PEA (3.1)
 ARF
                               *
PEA (11. 6) *3 001-055
•Pmoeolt for Onmion of Btwlin* Riik
Roy F. W««on, Inc.
EPA, NHDES
July 1991
Infonnttioa to Sttfe 4 Stapling tad AmUyiu PUn
   for th« PMM AFB SiM* - R*viMd*
Now
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.6) fi 001-002
•Dupottl of Drill Cumap From Sug* 2 and 3
Dtpiitmiat of tb* Air Fore*
NHDES
14Aufiull990
Now
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                                              11.7
PEA (11. 7) fl  001-006
*LMMr to EPA raquwonf review ind coocumoe* of riik i
          f A* Air Fore*
            del* end tenpliag procedure lever report'
20 Much 1991
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (11.7) 12 001-002
•LMtt cooMmuw UM of drilling mud-
Roy F. WMKNI, Inc.
Air Fora*
26 Dtc«o*«r 1990
Noo.
ARF
    MK01\RJT:00628026.004\zooelKxUpd
                            D-95
                                    07/14/95

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA(1 1. 7) « 001-002
LONG TITLE:             'Analytic*! Method* for Pease AFB'
AUTHOR:                Roy F. Weaon, Inc.
RECIPIENT:              Air Force
DATE:                   23 April 1991
TYPE:                   Letter
SECOND REFERENCE:     None
LOCATION:              ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:     PEA (11.7) #4001-001
LONG TITLE:             Consolidated Background Valua Letter Report
AUTHOR:                USAF
RECIPIENT:              Richard Pane. NHDES
                        Johanna Hunter, EPA
DATE:                   March 9, 1993
TYPE:          •         Letter Report
SECOND REFERENCE:     None
LOCATION:              ARF
    MK01\RPT:00628026.004\ionelnxLapd                  D-96                                          07/14/95

-------
                                        12.1




•BOH; NO EMTOES IN THB SECTION AT THIS TOffi
   MK01\RPT:00628026.004\zooelro
-------