WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES • 14010 HBQ 09/71
          Feasibility Study
        Upper Meander Creek
  Mine Drainage Abatement Project
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY • RESEARCH AND MONITORING

-------
       WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES
The Water Pollution Control  Research Series describes
the results and progress in the control  and abatement
of pollution in our Nation's waters.  They provide a
central source of information on the research,  develop-
ment, and demonstration activities in the Environmental
Protection Agency, through inhouse research and grants
and contracts with Federal, State, and local  agencies,
research institutions,  and industrial  organizations.

Inquires pertaining to  Water Pollution Control  Research
Reports should be directed to the Head,  Project Reports
System, Office of Research and Monitoring, Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, D. C.  20242

-------
                       Feasibility Study
Upper Meander Creek Mine Drainage Abatement  Project
                                by
                      Stanley Consultants
                        Cleveland, Ohio
                            for the
                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       Project #14-010 HBQ
                      Contract # 68-01-0063
                         September 1971
   For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 60 cents

-------
         EPA Review Notice

This report has been reviewed by the Office
of Research & Monitoring, EPA, and approved
for publication.  Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of
trade names or commerical products
consitute endorsement or recommendation
for use.
                ii

-------
                             CONTENTS


                                                                Page

SYNOPSIS                                                          1

PART I  - INTRODUCTION

    Scope of Investigation                                        3
    Project Objectives                                            4
    Project Description                                           5

PART II - JURISDICTION FRAMEWORK

    Agency Responsibility                                         7
    Mine Drainage Abatement Authority                             8
    Water Quality Standards                                       8
    Site Acquisition                                              9
    Water and Mineral Rights                                     11
    Future Pollution Control                                     11

PART III - INVENTORY AND FORECAST

    Physical Conditions                                          13
    Land Use                                                     13
    Mining and Reclamation History                               15
    Water Quality Situation                                      17
    Hydrology and Meteorology                                    20
    Social and Economic Environment                              23
    Data Adequacy                                                2k

PART IV - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FEATURES

    Abatement Project Description                                27
    Field Survey and Mapping                                     27
    Drainage Improvements                                        28
    Regrading                                                    31
    Revegetation                                                 36
    Land Use Redevelopment                                       39
    Program Surveillance                                         41
    Emergency Procedures                                         43
    Cost Estimate                                                43
    Cost Comparison                                              45

PART V - PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS

    Demonstration Value                                          47
    Water Quality Improvements                                   47
    Cost Savings                                                 48
    Aesthetics, Fish and Wildlife                                49
                                111

-------
PART VI - IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION
     Project Responsibility
     Program Schedule

PART VII  - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
                                                     51
                                                     51

                                                     53
                              FIGURES
Figure 1  -
Figure 2  -
Figure 3  ~
Figure 4  -
Figure 5  -
Figure 6  -
Figure 7  ~
Figure 8  -
Figure 9  -
Figure 10 -
Fi gure 11 -
Figure 12 -
Figure 13 -
Figure 14 -
Figure 15 -
Figure 16 -
Location Map
Property Ownership
Area Physical Features
Geological Core Section
Land Use Features
Mining History
Water Q_ual i ty Data
Area Cross Section
Neutralization Schematic
 Regraded Channel Profile
 Grading Plan
 Typical Regraded Sections
 Typical Regraded Sections
 Revegetation Plan
 Land Use Redevelopment
 Program Schedule
Page

 4
 10
 13
 14
 15
 16
 18
 21
 30
 32
 33
 34
 35
 40
 42
 52
                              TABLES
Table 1  - Water Quality Analyses
Table 2 - Stratton Road Water Quality Analyses
Table 3 - Precipitation Probability Data
Table 4 - Impounded Water Volumes
Table 5 - Backfill Quantities
Table 6 - Soil  Analyses
Table 7 - Program Cost Estimate
Table 8 - Cost  Comparison
                                                     Page

                                                     17
                                                     20
                                                     22
                                                     29
                                                     36
                                                     36
                                                     43
                                                     45

-------
                             SYNOPSIS
The Upper Meander Creek Site  in Mahoning County, Ohio, has been exten-
sively surface mined for coal.  The area has been graded to a moderately
rolling terrain with the exception of the final cut which created a deeply
incised valley.  Required reclamation, including tree plantings, was
completed in  1962.  Revegetation of the spoil area has met with only
limited success, leaving the majority of the site generally devoid of
tree and grass cover and subject to rapid runoff and severe erosion.
Water emanating from the study area generally exhibits a pH below 3-0
and a total acidity in excess of 1,000 milligrams per liter.

A mine drainage abatement demonstration project is recommended for the
area to demonstrate effective techniques for mine drainage abatement
and beneficial utilization of a mined area, and also to solve a speci-
fic mine drainage problem.  The general features of the recommended pro-
gram include  the following steps:

     1.  Elimination of standing pools of acidic water.

     2.  Regrading of the final cut to provide positive drainage from
         the  area.

     3-  Preparation of a suitable seed bed and planting of acid toler-
         ant  grasses, plants, and trees.

     4.   Implementation of beneficial land use features following success-
         full reclamation.  This phase will be the responsibility of the
         agency retaining permanent control of the area and has not been
          included as part of the federally-aided demonstration.

A major jurisdictiona1 problem must be solved immediately if an effec-
tive mine drainage demonstration program is to be initiated.  The mined
land is presently on private property and transfer to a public agency
must be completed to meet State of Ohio requirements before an application
can be submitted for federal demonstration grant funds.  At the present
time there are three public agencies which might be considered for ulti-
mate ownership of the mined property.  These are the Ohio Department of
Natural Resources, the Mahoning County Commissioners, and the Mahoning
Valley Sanitary District.

Based upon significant levels of input of equipment time and personnel
services by local  agencies,  a total  estimated cost for the demonstra-
tion project  is $270,000.  Substantial benefits will accrue to the pro-
ject in the form of direct water treatment cost savings for the Mahoning
Valley Sanitary District and its 275,000 customers.  Less tangible but
equally significant improvements in  the aquatic environment of Meander
Creek and aesthetic improvements of  the mined land and the corridor
along the waterway draining the area will  result from the program.

-------
                       PART I  -  INTRODUCTION
Scope of Investigation

This report is a presentation of an evaluation of the feasibility of a
mine drainage control demonstration project for the Upper Meander Creek
site in Mahoning County, Ohio.  The specific scope of the investigations
is as follows:

     1.  Review the history of mining, mine drainage problems, and mine
         drainage abatement measures  in the study area.

     2.  Assess the jurisdictional framework through which a mine drain-
         age abatement demonstration  project may be carried out.  Outline
         possible designation of responsibility for present and future
         pollution abatement practices, site acquisition and funding of
         an improvement program.

     3-  Inventory local physical features, hydrology, water quality,
         social and evironmental factors, and other elements influencing
         the value of a mine drainage demonstration project in the study
         area.

     k.  Develop preliminary engineering features of a workable mine
         drainage abatement program in sufficient detail to permit evalu-
         ation of the feasibility of  the proposed project.

     5-  Estimate the effectiveness of the project and delineate possible
         beneficial uses for the reclaimed strip mined area upon comple-
         tion of the drainage abatement improvements.

     6.  Determine tangible and intangible benefits of the recommended
         program.

     7-  Develop an outline of scheduling and budgeting to assure ade-
         quate administrative control of the proposed project.

     8.  Recommend facilities and a continuing program for surveillance
         of mine drainage from the improved area.  Delineate means for
         measuring the accomplishments of the demonstration program with
         respect to presently envisioned objectives.

-------
          MEANDER
          CREEK
          RESERVOIR
                 SCALE IN MILES
                           Figure 1  - Location Map
Project Objectives
The study area, which is the subject of this mine drainage feasibility
investigation, is located in Mahoning County, Ohio,  in the Meander
Creek watershed, as shown in Figure 1.  The acidic over-burden present
in the geological structure has resulted in a spoil  bank which, although
limited in extent, is extremely toxic in character.  Only sparse  vegeta-
tion has been established on the spoil material and  serious  degradation
of the natural water features below the site has developed.

-------
The two major objectives of the mine drainage abatement program analyzed
herein are:

     1.  Demonstrate effective techniques for mine drainage abatement
         including necessary management aspects and ultimate utilization
         of the mined area in a manner which will create a measurable
         pub 1i c benefi t.

     2.  Solve a specific troublesome mine drainage problem and thereby
         improve conditions for all downstream water-related activity -

Project Description

The Upper Meander Creek site has been mined entirely by surface tech-
niques.  The proposed mine drainage abatement project will demonstrate
means for alleviating problems related to previous mining activity of
this type.

The final cut from the stripping operation has been dammed at several
locations.  Resulting pools of water are quite acidic in nature and the
source of an almost continual discharge into the downstream watercourse.
The first phase of the mine drainage abatement project will involve
elimination of the standing bodies of water which are contributory to
the acidic situation.  Following this activity, regrading of the spoil
banks will be undertaken to provide positive drainage for the area and to
cover, when possible, concentrations of acid forming materials.  Follow-
ing the necessary regrading for drainage control, surface treatment of
the spoil banks will be undertaken.  This will include surface grading,
liming, fertilization, planting and seeding as necessary to retain the
precipitation on the land, create a new soil layer, improve the aesthe-
tics of the area, and provide for more beneficial utilization of the
site.  The final phase  in the long-range program will involve addition
of recreational and other public use features to the area to demonstrate
and enhance the possible public benefits of a complete mine drainage
abatement and reclamation effort.

-------
                PART  II - JURISDICTION FRAMEWORK
Agency Responsibility

At the present time all of the previously mined area  in the study region
is on private property.  As such, there has been no concerted local effort
to make improvements for the purpose of abating acid mine drainage.  How-
ever, there are three public agencies which have been considered for
possible ultimate ownership of the mined property.  These agencies are
listed below along with a discussion of the reasons for considering this
form of public ownership, and apparent disadvantages accruing to each
agency.

     1.  State of Ohio.  The majority of the public land in the State
         of Ohio is under the control of state agencies, principally
         the Department of Natural Resources.  Therefore, it is logical
         to consider transfer of ownership of the Upper Meander Creek
         mined area to the State Department of Natural Resources.  Ad-
         ministratively, a structure is available which could provide
         the operational resources to encourage public utilization.
         Practically, however, the mined tract is too small to be econ-
         omically managed as a state area.  Utilization would be almost
         exclusively by persons living in the immediate vicinity.  The
         site is not well suited for development as an intensive use
         facility and the man-days of recreational activity which would
         accrue to a wilderness type development would not justify the
         expense in maintenance and administration of the project area
         with state forces.

     2.  Mahoning County Commissioners.  A more reasonable arrangement
         for management of the area would be through the county govern-
         ment.  Present operating departments have the expertise and
         equipment necessary for development and maintenance of facil-
         ities.  The size of the area is reasonable for a county park
         development.  The county agency would therefore appear to be
         the logical organization for further consideration for ulti-
         mate ownership and development of the mined area.  At the
         present time, however, Mahoning County does not have an
         organized park district.

     3.  Mahoning Valley Sanitary District.  This agency utilizes
         Meander Creek Reservoir as a source of raw water for a treat-
         ment plant and transmission system which serves Youngstown,
         Niles, and surrounding areas.  Acidic runoff from the mined
         land enters the reservoir and adds to the cost of water treat-
         ment.  Certain public benefits would therefore result if the
         Mahoning Valley Sanitary District would obtain ownership of
         the property as a means of preserving the integrity of water

-------
         entering Meander Creek Reservoir.  The principal disadvantage  to
         ownership by this agency is that there is no incentive to  im-
         prove the property for public utilization; therefore, except
         for water quality improvements, little public benefit is likely
         to be derived from Sanitary District ownership of the property.
Mine Drainage Abatement Authority
Regardless of the public agency which ultimately retains ownership of
the strip-mined area, it is reasonable to expect the State Department
of Natural Resources to apply for and administer a mine drainage demon-
stration grant and to assume responsibility for the proper conduct of
the construction and development program.

The State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources, through the Director,
pursuant to Sections 1501.01; 1501.011; 1501.02; and 1501.021 of the
Ohio Revised Code may enter into cooperative or contractural arrangements
with the United States or any agency or department thereof for the accom-
plishment of the purposes for which the department was created.  Senate
Bill No. 13 (19^*9) created the Department of Natural  Resources "...to
formulate and put into execution a long-term comprehensive plan and pro-
gram for the development and wide use of the natural  resources of the
State to the end that health, happiness, and wholesome enjoyment of life
of the people of Ohio may be further encouraged; that increased recrea-
tional opportunities and advantages be made available to the people of
Ohio and visitors; that industry, agriculture, employment, investment
and other economic interests may be assisted and encouraged...."

Water Quality Standards

The Water Pollution Control Board of the State of Ohio adopted Water
Quality Standards on October 13, 1970, for the Mahoning River and tri-
butaries which includes the stream originating in the study area.  The
use classifications applicable to the Meander Creek and other tribu-
taries in the immediate vicinity of the site include:

         Recreation

         Public water supply

         Aquatic 1ife A

         Industrial  water supply

         Agricultural use and stock watering

The adopted criteria contain certain minimum conditions that are appli-
cable to all  waters at all  places and at all times.  These conditions
state that the waters shall be:

-------
     1.  Free from substances attributable to municipal, industrial or
         other discharges, or agricultural practices that will settle
         to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable sludge deposits.

     2.  Free from floating debris, oil, scum, and other floating
         materials attributable to municipal, industrial or other
         discharges, or agricultural practices in amounts sufficient
         to be unsightly or deleterious.

     3-  Free from materials attributable to municipal, industrial or
         other discharges, or agricultural practices producing color,
         odor or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance.

     k.  Free from substances attributable to municipal, industrial or
         other discharges, or agricultural practices in concentrations
         or combinations which are toxic or harmful to human, animal,
         plant, or aquatic life.

 In addition to the foregoing minimum conditions, certain specific
 criteria have been adopted for each water use classification.  Most of
 these are not applicable to the proposed mine drainage project.  Those
which are a consideration  in the program are summarized as follows:

     1.  Water which is used as a source of public supply should not
         exhibit dissolved solids concentrations exceeding 500 mg/1 as
         a monthly average nor 750 mg/1 at any time.

     2.  To meet Aquatic Life A requirements, pH values should not be
         below 6.0 nor above 8.5 except that daily fluctuations outside
         of the specified  range which are correlated with photosynthetic
         activity may be tolerated.

 Si te Acqui s i tion

 Recent ownership of all property in the square mile containing the
 tracts disturbed by the previous mining activity is shown in Figure 2.
The extent of the mining on the affected parcels of property is also
 generally indicated in the figure.

A lawsuit has been brought against the present owners of the strip
mined property by the City of Youngstown, Ohio, and the Mahoning Valley
Sanitary District, claiming damages as a result of increased water treat-
ment costs due to the acid mine drainage originating at the site.
Although no firm commitments have been reached, attempts are being made
to arrive at a settlement which would involve transfer of the property
to public ownership as a condition of settlement of the pending lawsuit.
For the purposes of this report, it has been assumed that a satisfactory
agreement will be reached and property ownership will reside with a
public agency.

-------
                                                          I
                                                              BOO
                                                           SCALE IN FEET
                                 1000
                                 J
                J
WESTERN RESERVE ROAD
                                        KEY TO  OWNERSHIP
                                     ir
               I. C.H. LUTZENBERGER
               2. C.H. LUTZENBERGER
               3. OAKLEY BATES
               U. G.N. GREENAMYER
               5. JAMES C. CAMPBELL
               6. W.W. S B.J. GREENAMYER
               7. WILLIAM H. BAIRD
               8. J. 5 E.L.  LATRONICA
                 CANFIELD SPORT CONV. CLUB INC.
               9. D. BAIRD
              10. G.W. S D.  REICHART
              II. A.J. S L.E. BEESON
              12. G.W. 5 D.  REICHART
              13.
              in.

              15.
              16.
              17.
              18.
              19.
              20.
              21 .
              22.
              23.
                                                     ELIAS DAVID & SHEBAN
BROWNLEE WOODS ROD
INC.
R. BRICKER
HAZEL M. BECK
E.F.S D.A. DOYLE
RAY M. BECK
K.T. S M.M. AUGUST
M. 5 L. BOBACK
H.M. BECK
RAY M. BECK
RAY M. BECK
              5 GUN CLUB
                             Figure  2 -  Property Ownership

Recommended property acquisition for the  demonstration  program includes
Tract  13 and approximately  the north two-thirds of  Tract  5 as  shown  in
Figure  2.   An  easement  may  also be  required to provide  for limited
grading at  the  southeast corner of  Tract  3.
                                               10

-------
Water and Mineral Rights

It is anticipated that any agreement reached regarding transfer of
property ownership would also entail a concurrent transfer of all water
and mineral rights associated with the property.

Future Pollution Control

The study area  is located at a high point  in the watershed.  Although
drainage originates at the site, there is  no upstream area contributing
surface water flow into and through the mined property.

It is anticipated that virtually the entire mined area will be trans-
ferred to public ownership.  As previously stated, all water and mineral
rights will be  transferred along with the  title to the property.  There-
fore, full  control of the mined portion of watershed will  reside with
the public  agency and assurance can be given that the project area will
not be adversely affected by the influx of acid or other mine water
pollution  from  nearby sources.

Considerable state and  local concern has been expressed over possible
adverse environmental effects of strip mining.  State permits must be
obtained for any proposed new coal mining  operation;  the state thus can
exert control over potential water pollution.   Local  interests also
have a bearing  on the permit procedure as  illustrated by a recent action
 in  the Meander  Creek watershed  in which a  proposal to open a new strip
mine was argued through  the  courts.  The ultimate ruling was in  favor of
 the  coal company, however,  because of mineral  rights  difficulties, mining
was  never  initiated.  The  state  policies and  local awareness and concern
provide  a  significant  level  of control over possible  future water pollution
 s i tuations .

A monitoring  and maintenance program will  be  included as a part  of
 remedial measures  in  the study  area  as  a  further water quality  safeguard
 and  to  provide  warning  of  any  increase  in  acid discharge.
                                 11

-------
                  PART  III  - INVENTORY AND  FORECAST
Physical  Conditions

Figure  3  is a base map  illustrating many  of  the significant  physical
features  of the study area.   This map has  been prepared from U.  S.
Geological  Survey, 7  1/2  minute topographic  maps and supplemented
with  further information  from numerous other sources.
                                                   DIEHL LAKE
                                                              SECTION NUMBER
                                                              STUDY AREA
                                                              WATERSHED BOUNDARY
                                                              POOL IDENTIFICATION
                                                              NUMBER
                  Figure  3  -  Area Physical  Features
                            i n
The
                          Goshen  township, Mahoning County, Ohio.
The study  area is located  iu ui_o i id i n-*wi 10111 ^,  rianwiiiii^ ouui i L y ,  UMI^
    surface mining activity which  has  resulted in objectional  acid
                   -vxirt«  f* f*.n -P I rs f-\ r\ -I-/-V 4-\-\f\  r>/-^V'f"l-»l»laf+- ^-Ml-i*--l-y~i*« rt-F  C t~\ f* 4- T *~*r
urtace mining activity wnicn  nas resulted  in  oojectionai acid
drainage  has  been confined  to the northwest quarter of Section
he northeast  quarter of  Section 3, Township  17  North, Range  k
                                   13

-------
West.  Western Reserve Road runs along the north edge of the mined
land and Stratton Road bisects Section 2 and forms the eastern boundary
for the site.

The entire study area is within the Meander Creek drainage basin.  The
watershed boundary for the strip mined land is shown in Figure 3-
Virtually all drainage from the area flows east, parallel to Western
Reserve Road and joins with the main stem of Meander Creek approxi-
mately one-half mile east of Stratton Road.

A series of pools of water remain impounded in the final cut.  Identi-
fication numbers have been assigned to these pools and are shown in
Figure 3.  These numbers are used throughout the balance of this
report.

There are no known gas, oil, or water wells in the immediate vicinity
of the mined land.  Detailed soil investigations were not undertaken
prior to mining or, if taken, were not recorded.  Borings were not
authorized as part of the current feasibility study.  As a result, only
a limited amount of subsurface information is available.  Figure k
                                     illustrates a core drilling taken
                                     near Western Reserve Road in the
                                     vicinity of Pools 3 and 4.  As
                                     shown, at this point about A2 feet
                                     of overburden covered the top of
                                     the coal seam.  This drilling was
                                     done for the Mahoning Valley Sani-
                                     tary District who also had analyses
                                     made of the pyritic sulphur content
                                     at various depths in the shale and
                                     sandstone formation immediately
                                     above the coal.  The sulphur con-
                                     tent increases with depth and un-
                                     doubtedly is a factor in the pro-
                                     duction in acid mine drainage.

                                     Land Use
GROUND SURFACE
I—
LL
LL
LL
=t
0*
LL
-a
or:
LL
LLj
LL.
CO
CX|

'TOPSOIL & CLAY-
SANDSTONE
28" COAL

c\
v — 8" FIRE CLAY

1
fi
9 '
y
-^
J--
Y
PYRITIC SULFUR
(CONTENT, /o)
n nfi

	 I. 51
	 6.^7
                                     Within the Meander Creek watershed,
                                     existing land use  is primarily
                                     agricultural with scattered  rural
                                     residential developments.  Figure
                                     5 illustrates significant  land  use
                                     features.  As shown, industrial
                                     operations  in the watershed  consist
                                     of a  limited number of small  mining
                                     operations.  Recreation facilities
                                     in the watershed  include three  pri-
                conservation and gun clubs, two camps, a small  park,  and
                Of note  is  the fact that the property  of both conservation
 clubs directly adjoins the  tracts  that will be  improved by  the  proposed
 mine drainage abatement  demonstration program.
       Figure k - Geological
           Core Section
vate lakes, two
a golf course.

-------
                                            »  ' E J[™-."- „'' ,.j, *'k o o K |F i E L. ?
                                                MVSD   RESERVED ^L^.
                                                LAND            t&r^'
         l^"Ji . ~'3*»«JL-X".,
         ^L^^TJ
SPONDEROSA'
                 SCALE IN MILES
                   Figure 5 ~ Land Use Features

Mining and Reclamation History

Surface mining operations were begun  in the study area in the early
19^0's, before legislation relating to reclamation of strip-mined  land
was enacted.  C & M Mining Company was the first operator in the area
affecting approximately  18.1 acres.   Sheban Mining Company stripped a
total of 21.7 acres between 1950 and  1956.  Fairfield Coal Company was
the third and final operator on the site affecting a total acreage of
67 acres during the five-year period  from 1956 to I960.  Figure 6
illustrates the areas stripped by each of the three mining companies.
                                  15

-------
                              LEGEND

                              C.& M. MINING COMPANY
                              I9U2  - I 9U3

                              SHEBAN MINING
                              COMPANY 1950 -  1956

                              FAIRFI1ELD  COAL
                              COMPANY-|956 -  I960
                         Figure 6   Mining History

The Middle Kittanning  (No. 6) coal seam was the geological formation
mined.   The coal  layer was 26 to 28 inches thick and was characterized
by a vein of clay four to six inches above the bottom of the coal, thus
giving the impression of  a false bottom.  No accurate data was recorded
relative to the elevation of  the coal seam; however, discussions with
Fairfield Coal  Company personnel and others familiar with the mini-ng
operation indicated  a general dip  to the southeast of five feet per mile
with some irregularities  noted.

The mined area  has  been  graded  to  a moderately rolling terrain with
the exception of the final cut  which generally conforms to the same
cross-section which  existed when mining operations ceased.   In 19&1,
                                     16

-------
five earthen dams were constructed by Fairfield Coal Company  in  an
attempt to control acid drainage.  Reclamation, including necessary
tree plantings, was completed in  1962 with all  legal requirements
having been satisfied.  Revegetation of the spoil area has met with
only limited success, leaving the majority of the site generally
devoid of tree and grass cover and subject to rapid  run-off and  severe
erosion.  A small area at the west end of the site has been reclaimed
for agricultural purposes with a  reasonable degree of success.

Water Quality Situation

A series of ten water samples were collected on April 23, 1971,  for
analysis of chemical constituents.  Sample locations are shown on Figure
7 and analytical results presented in Table 1.  Flow rates were  deter-
mined for each sample collected from a flowing stream utilizing  a port-
able V-notch wei r.

                              TABLE 1

                      WATER QUALITY ANALYSES
Sample No.   Flow
              gpm
     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
     8
     9
    10
Total
Soli ds
 mg/1
Conductivi ty
  mi cromhos
I ron
mg/1
Acidi ty
 mg/1
64
61
100
—
3.1
—
24
1.8
8
—
5,544
5,970
5,620
3,076
6,624
5,138
5,550
8,114
4,625
4,559
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
3-0
2.9
3-0
3.1
3-2
                      ,100
                      ,900
                      ,200
                      ,850
                      ,200
                      ,000
                      ,900
                      ,700
                      ,500
                    2,500
5.2 1
2.1
13-4
14.8
4.3
2.0
8.6
12.8
10.4
12.8
,080
,180
,160
400
940
,040
,420
,920
,080
,100
Sample 1 was collected at Stratton  Road  and  represents  the  composite
of all drainage originating  in  the  mined area.  As shown  in the  table,
the pH of the water was 2.8  and  the total acidity  (to the phenol-
phthalein end point) was 1,080  mg/1.  The measured flow was 64 gallons
per minute or a rate of 92,000  gallons per day.

Sample 2 was collected at the west  or inlet  end of the  long narrow
pool  (No. 2) which parallels Western Reserve Road.  This  pool was
apparently created as a surge lagoon to  contain or buffer drainage
originating in the area during  the  active mining operation.  The
measured flow rate was approximately the same  as at Point 1 and  the
acidity was 100 mg/1 greater.
                                  17

-------
oo
                    -POINT NO.  10
                     (1100)
                                                                                                           POINT NO.  I
                                                                                                           (1080)-
                                                                                                           POINT NO. 2  12
                                                                                                      3)    (1180)
                                   LEGEND

                             •     WATER QUALITY SAMPLING POINT

                           (1080)  SAMPLE  ACIDITY, mg/l

                            (?)    POOL NUMBER
                                                                               SCALE IN FEET
                                                     Figure 7  - Water Quality  Data

-------
Sample 3 was taken at the dam of Pool  1.  Measured flow at  this point
was 100 gallons per minute with acidity of  1,160 mg/1.  The apparent
loss of water between Point  3 and Points  1  and 2 is difficult  to ex-
plain.  Gaging errors might  be suspected, except that these results
are confirmed by a similar series of measurements by other  investigators
approximately one year ago.  A loss of water was noted between the same
two points and in about the  same order-of-magnitude.  Soil  borings to
evaluate subsurface conditions and to  verify elevation of the  ground-
water table were not within  the scope  of  the investigations.   However,
it  is apparent that soil formations and groundwater levels  are such
that a portion of the discharge from Pool 1  is percolating  downward  into
the underground water system.

Discharge from Pool k, the very small  pond  immediately west of the
entrance road into the mined area, is  characterized by Sample  5-
There was no visible flow or seepage into No. k from the larger pool
to  the west from which Sample No. k was collected.  This latter pool
(No. 5) was created by the earliest mining  activity in the  area and
has, therefore, experienced  over 20 years   of natural weathering of
the tributary area.  This has resulted  in an acidity of kOO mg/1,
which is the best water quality of any of the pools on the  site.

Sample 6 was taken from the  extreme south end of Pool 1 and exhibited
an  acidity of 1,040 mg/1.  This is only slightly less than was measured
at  the outlet of the pool.

Sample 8 represents the stream feeding the  west arm of Pool 1.  A
flow of 2k gallons per minute was recorded  and the acidity  of  1,420
mg/1 was somewhat higher than the 1,160 mg/1 measured at Point 3-  This
indicates that the additional water entering the large pond, probably
from underground sources, is of better quality than that entering in
the surface stream flowing down the old final cut pit.

Small flows were measured at sample Points  8 and 9 (1.8 and 8  gpm,
respectively).  Flow from the north at Point 8 exhibited the highest
acidity of any of the samples, 1,920 mg/1,  but was extremely small in
volume.  Sample .10 was taken from the west  end of Pool 7-   Acidity at
this point was essentially the same as  in the stream leaving the pool.

Using the acid flow rate in  pounds per unit of time at Stratton Road
as a base, approximately 5 percent of  the base flow is represented by
the sample at Point 8 and another 10 percent by the sample  at  Point 9-
The acid flow rate at Point  7 is approximately 50 percent of the base
figure, indicating that there is a significant acid pick-up through
the stream channel between Point 7 and Points 8 and 9.  This can be
partially attributed to the  considerable  amount of coal refuse lying
exposed along the stream channel.

The Mahoning Valley Sanitary District has been routinely sampling the
water quality at Stratton Road for several  years.  Results  of  tests  col-
lected over the time span of a recent year  are shown in Table  2.
                                 19

-------
                              TABLE 2

                           STRATTON ROAD
                      WATER QUALITY ANALYSES

Date                     jpji              Acidity                 COD
                                          mg/1                    mg/1

April, 1970              3.2              1 ,110                  13-8
May, 1970                3-0                270                   1.2
June, 1970               2.8                150                   3-3
July, 1970               2.8              1 ,330                   7.4
August, 1970             2.9              3,820                   8.0
September, 1970          2.8              1,240                   6.1
October, 1970            2.8              1,380                   3.8
November, 1970           3-1              1,020                  25-7
December, 1970           3-2              1,090                  36.6
January, 1971            3-2                970                  23.6
February, 1971           3-4                720                  29-3
March, 1971              3.4                530                  16.8
April , 1971              3-3                980                  33-2

Review of the data indicates a considerable  range of values.   For the
most part, however, acidity was in the 1,000-1,400 mg/1  range.   On this
basis, it can be concluded that the series of samples presented in Table
1  represents reasonably typical conditions.

Hydrology and Meteorology

Hydrology, particularly as related to the underground flow of water, is
one of the most important considerations dealing with mine drainage and
possible abatement measures in the Upper Meander Creek area.   The re-
cent hydrologic history of the mined land is difficult to assess from
available records.  Verbal accounts persist  regarding artesian flow
from boreholes drilled prior to initiation of mining in the area.  These
accounts are not substantiated by written or photographic records and the
occurrence of artesian flow is difficult to  relate to the specific
geology of the region.

Figure 8 presents a cross-section cut diagonally across the strip mined
area and intersecting Stratton Road, Western Reserve Road and Meander
Creek.  As shown in the figure, the flow line of Meander Creek is at an
elevation of approximately 1167.  Pool No. 1 in the stripped area pre-
sently exhibits a water surface of 1180.5; the elevation of the bottom
of the pond  is approximately 1160.  To the north, Pool No. 5 has a water
surface elevation of 1185.5 and a bottom elevation of about 1180.  Con-
tinuing to the northwest along the line of the cross-section, the ground
slopes downward from Western Reserve Road to the West Branch Meander
Creek.
                                     20

-------
                   5+00   120 + 00   125 + 00   130 + 00   135 + 00
                                    SECTION *
                   Figure 8 - Area Cross  Section

It would appear that prior to mining  in the  area,  there was  probably
very little discharge of water  from the site except  during precipita-
tion events.  The normal groundwater  table was  intercepted by  Meander
Creek and West Branch Meander Creek,  and  thus stabilized  at  an  eleva-
tion well below the ground surface.   As a result of  the mining  in  the
area, the groundwater table was  intercepted  and a  convenient channel
provided for release of the water.  Continuation of  this  net flow  from
the strip mined area contributes significantly  to  the  mine drainage
problem which exists today.
                                  21

-------
The previously described water sampling and gaging program conducted
by Stanley Consultants yielded a discharge from the entire area as
measured at Stratton Road of approximately 64 gallons per minute.
With a tributary drainage area of 143 acres, this discharge corres-
ponds to a yield of 0.6k cubic feet per second per square mile.  Com-
paring this value with long-term records for Meander Creek at Ohlstown
prior to any regulation or diversion of the stream, a median discharge
of 0.16 cfs per square mile has been recorded and an average discharge
of 0.92 cfs per square mile is noted.  The drainage area for the gaging
station is 77-2 square miles.   This data has been taken from the "Water
Inventory of the Mahoning and Grand River Basins and Adjacent Areas  in
Ohio" Inventory Report No. 16 of the Ohio Department of Natural Re-
sources Division of Water.

On the basis of the foregoing comparison, the flow as measured at
Stratton Road does not appear to be unreasonable or even excessively
high.  More definitive conclusions with regard to the water yield of
the mined area cannot be drawn without extensive long-term collection
of flow data.

Precipitation records are not available for the specific strip mined
property.  Table 1 is a presentation of precipitation probability data
for Canfield, Ohio, which is approximately 8 miles northeast of the
site.  This data is taken from the Ohio Agricultural Research and De-
velopment Center, Research Bulletin 1017, March, 1969, "Monthly and
Annual Precipitation Probabilities for Selected Locations in Ohio."

                              TABLE 3
                  Precipitation Probability Data
   Precipitation  With  Probability  Equal  or Less  Than

.10    .20     .30    .40     .50     .60     .70     .80
                                                                  .90
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun .
Jul .
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
.95
.87
1.52
1.51
1.41
1.91
1.78 :
1.20
• 90
.67
1.09
.93
.29
.12
.88
.92
.92
2.37
>.27
.62
.29
.04
.44
.23
1.58
1.34
2.18
2.27
2.36
2.76
2.68
1.98
1.63
1.38
1.74
1.48
1.86
1.54
2.46
2.59
2.79
3.12
3.06
2.32
1-97
1.74
2.02
1-73
2.16
1.75
2.74
2.92
3.23
3.48
3.46
2.68
2.33
2.12
2.31
1.98
2.48
1.97
3.03
3.27
3.72
3.87
3.88
3.07
2.73
2.56
2.63
2.25
2.86
2.24
3-38
3.68
4.30
4.32
4.38
3.53
3.20
3.09
3.00
2.58
3.35
2.57
3.81
4.20
5.04
4.88
5.00
4.12
3.82
3.79
3.48
4.11
3.00
4.47
4.99
6.21
5.74
5.96
5.04
4.80
4.91
4.21
                                                          2.99   3-62

Annual  27.99  29-94  31.40  32.69  33-92  35.19  36.58  38.25  40.65
                                     22

-------
The precipitation data, as indicated, is typical for north central
Ohio.  Of significance is the fact that in a normal year, over 53
percent of the annual precipitation occurs between April and October.
This is the season during which vegetative cover on the strip mined
area would be most beneficial for reducing the  runoff and also corres-
ponds with the period when downstream uses are most adversely affected
by mine drainage.

Social  and Economic Environment
Acid mine drainage has been a major source of pollution to Meander
Creek and Meander Creek Reservoir for over 20 years.  In September,
1963, the first major fish kill  in Meander Creek was reported.  The
Ohio Division of Wildlife estimated that approximately 6,650 fish of
various species were destroyed by acid pollution, reportedly from the
study area.

The release of acid water has also had an adverse effect on several
small recreational lakes  in the  vicinity.  Ponderosa Lake, formerly
Dunn Eden Lake, depends on Meander Creek for water to maintain adequate
lake levels.  Each recent year,  Ponderosa Lake has been drained con-
currently with the release of acid water from the mined area.  This
procedure allows the acid to pass rapidly through the lake with a mini-
mum of damage.  After the slug of contaminated water is past, Ponderosa
Lake is allowed to refill with better water.  This yearly drainage
operation has caused the owner of Ponderosa Park considerable expense
and inconvenience, but has been  necessary to ensure adequate water
quality for swimming and fishing throughout the summer recreation sea-
son.  Recently, the lake has been completely restocked each year at the
owner's expense.

A major flood occurred in June,  1970, when the large dam at the strip
mine area burst, and an estimated 20 million gallons of acid water was
released.  Area residents indicate that the 1970 flood, although the
most severe, was the third such  occurrence in three years.

Ponderosa Lake was forced to release water to prevent dam failure.  The
1970 flood essentially put Ponderosa out of business for fishing and
swimming during the remainder of the recreation season.

Damage was widespread affecting  not only Ponderosa Lake, but Diehl
Lake and a small private lake immediately adjacent to the study area.
Flood water reportedly running two feet deep forced the temporary
closure of Western Reserve Road.  The owners of the small private lake
reported $1,000 damage to their  driveway as well as pollution of their
lake.

Diehl Lake, north of the study area, is located on West Branch Meander
Creek and is not normally affected by drainage from the site unless the
                                  23

-------
water gets out of control and crosses Western Reserve Road.  In 1970,
property owners around Diehl Lake reported property damage as a result
of the flood and expressed concern for their recently stocked lake.

Meander Creek Reservoir, operated by Mahoning Valley Sanitary District,
is the primary water supply source for the Youngstown metropolitan
area.  The District provides water to Youngstown and Niles, which  in
turn supply potable water to approximately one-third of the rural  por-
tion of Mahoning County and two townships in Trumbull County, for  a total
present service population of approximately 275,000 people.  Acid  con-
taminated water entering Meander Creek Reservoir from the mined area
increases the cost of water treatment for acidity and hardness.  A six
percent water rate increase has recently been initiated by MVSD for
the entire distribution service area.  Approximately one-quarter of
this rate hike has been attributed to increased water treatment costs.

Acid mine water from the study area has serious environmental implica-
tions.  Naturally occurring aquatic life along the twelve miles of
Meander Creek from the mined site to the reservoir has been adversely
affected or entirely destroyed due to the high acidity of the water.
Wildlife cover along the creek has been stunted or eliminated by the
action of the acid.  Local conservationists and hunters have noticed a
marked decline in wildlife habitat and a corresponding reduction in
wildlife along Meander Creek.  The continued pollution and degradation
of Meander Creek with acid mine water is not consistent with state and
federal goals of improving and preserving water quality in natural
waterways.

Local, state, and federal officials have been searching for a solution
to this particular mine drainage problem since 1963.  Several solutions
including a sanitary landfill development have been proposed, but no-
thing has materialized.  Two previous applications for federal  demon-
stration improvement projects have been rejected due to the expense
involved.

The proposed demonstration project will alleviate many of the water qua-
lity problems resulting from drainage from the site.  Improved water
quality will  eventually restore the Meander Creek environment to the
quality level necessary to sustain aquatic and plant life.

Data Adequacy

Available information on water quality and hydrology related to the
study area is somewhat sketchy.  Sufficient data is available,  however,
to define the order-of-magnitude of the problem and to establish a
base against  which improvements can be measured.

Additional  specific water resource data would be helpful, but is not
absolutely necessary for the proper design of a remedial program.  Ade-
quate judgments can be made regarding the type of improvements  to be

-------
undertaken; it is more important to move ahead with the implementation
of a program than to expend further time and effort in refining the ba-
si c data inventory.
                                  25

-------
            PART  IV - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING  FEATURES
Abatement Project Description

The mine drainage problems  resulting  from  previous mining of  the  study
area are typical of those  resulting from surface mining for coal  in
regions characterized by acidic overburden materials.  The  low  pH and
high salt content of the spoil banks  has Inhibited plant growth.  As a
result, there  is little or  no ground  cover to  retain  surface  runoff and
curtail erosion.  The proposed mine drainage demonstration  program  is
designed to break the cycle of erosion, acid formation, inhibition of
plant growth and further erosion.  Provisions  will be outlined  for  re-
turning the presently unproductive land back into an  asset  to the region.

A multi-phase  demonstration program has been developed.  The  four steps
required to fully implement the mine  drainage  abatement and reclamation
features are as follows:

     1.  Elimination of standing pools of  acidic water which  are  con-
         tributing to the  pollution of Meander Creek.

     2.  Regrading of the  final cut to provide positive drainage  from
         the area, to reduce the rate of discharge of water from  the
         groundwater table, and to provide surface conditions amenable
         to establishment  of ground cover.

     3.  Preparation of a  suitable seed bed and planting of acid  toler-
         ant grasses, plants, and trees to reduce runoff and  create a
         more  usable and appealing area.

     4.  Construction of recreational features.  Ultimate land  use
         development is beyond the scope of the program required  for
         mine  drainage abatement.  A  typical plan has been  prepared,
         however, which illustrates possible public utilization bene-
         fits  which may result from the mine drainage abatement program.

Field Survey and Mapping

Available information has  been utilized to the fullest possible extent
in analysis of the mine drainage problem and in the development of  a
workable abatement program.  U. S. Geological  Survey  maps and field
surveys by the Mahoning Valley Sanitary District have provided  much of
the required basic information.

In addition, however, detailed maps were developed specifically for
this project.  Utilizing aerial photography and related mapping tech-
niques, contour maps with  a horizontal scale of one  inch to 100 feet,
and a contour  interval of  two feet have been prepared.  Coverage  in-
cludes all of  the final cut—highwall area and sufficient width on
                                27

-------
either side of the final cut to permit analysis of drainage patterns and
the topography influencing area regrading.

A series of soundings were taken to determine the depth of water  in
the impoundments and to estimate the quantity of silt and muck which
has been deposited at the bottom of the pools.  Copies of the contour
maps and depth soundings are on file with EPA.

Drainage Improvements

The water presently impounded throughout the study area can be imme-
diately recognized as a potential  threat to downstream water uses.
Characteristics of the water have previously been discussed.  As  a
long-term mine drainage abatement measure, it appears desirable that the
majority of the impounded water be treated and released, and positive  drain-
age provided for the area.   It  is proposed that all of the pools  except Nos,
2 and 5 be drained and filled.  Pool  2 did not result from the excava-
tion of the coal seam but was instead created for the purpose of  provid-
ing capacity for handling surges of water during the active mining
period.  The water quality analyses previously presented do not indicate
any net increase in acid concentrations through Pool 2.  This pool can
therefore be retained to provide a water feature in the ultimate  devel-
opment of the property and to provide a surge basin for partial sediment
and acid control, particularly during the period immediately following
the proposed grading and planting.

Pool 5 remains from the first mining activity in the area.  Over  twenty
years of natural leaching have thus removed many of the acid forming
salts from the tributory drainage area.  The present acidity in the pool
is about 400 mg/1, contrasted to the 1,000 mg/1 or more which is  found
in the rest of the pools throughout the study area.  Some revegetation
has occurred in the area around Pool  5.  Due to the relatively good
quality of water, and the partially revegetated condition of the  adja-
cent slopes, it has been deemed desirable to leave Pool 5 intact.  This
relatively small impoundment could be filled during a later phase of the
program if, after the initial elements are completed, it  is determined
to have a detrimental effect on drainage from the site.

The rest of the pools will be drained.  On the basis of recent aerial
photographs and soundings of water depth, the volume in the various
pools has been calculated to be approximately as shown in Table 4.  Of
the nearly 23 million gallons presently impounded, over 20 million will
be displaced during the regrading phase of the demonstration project.
                                        28

-------
                              TABLE 4

                       IMPOUNDED WATER VOLUMES

         Pool Number                          Volume, Gallons

             1                                   15,050,000
             2                                     825,000
             3                                     400,000
             ^                                     120,000
             5                                    1,400,000
             6                                     280,000
             7                                    4,910,000

                      TOTAL  IMPOUNDED WATER-      22,985,000

Uncontrolled release of this water could cause serious damage to the
reach of Meander Creek between the study area and Meander Creek
Reservoir.   In the  reservoir itself, the dilution factor would minimize
the effect of the acid on aquatic life.

Upon reaching Meander Creek Reservoir the acidic water will ultimately
be taken through the Mahoning Valley Sanitary District Water Treatment
Plant.  Additional  chemical costs will be incurred by the District for
treatment of the water which is now held on the  site.  However, neutral-
ization of the water prior to release to the stream would require the
same amount of neutralizing chemical as if treatment were accomplished
at the water treatment plant.  It would, undoubtedly, be more efficient
and economical to allow the release of the untreated water to the stream
with subsequent treatment at the plant.

The main problem, therefore, is to eliminate or  minimize damage to the
stream between the  site and the reservoir.  If the impounded water were
released at a controlled rate during the winter  months when there is no
water related recreational activity along the stream, the amount of
damage could be held to a minimum.  Discussions  with Ohio State Health
Department personnel indicate that such an approach might be tolerated
if an acceptable agreement could be reached with  the downstream property
owners.  However, based upon the initial reaction of all concerned
parties and considering the probable environmental impact, it has been
assumed that neutralization of the impounded acid water must be provided
on site.  To accomplish this neutralization, a facility with a flow pat-
tern as shown in Figure 9 is proposed.

The major features  and operating sequence of the  neutralization facility
are as follows:

     1.  The dam at the north end of Pool 1 should be raised to provide
         storage capacity and operational flexibility.
                                29

-------
                                        CHEMICAL
                                        STORAGE
                                        TANK

                                          -AIR LIFT
                                           DISCHARGE PIPE

                                          -AIR
                                           COMPRESSOR
               Figure 9 - Neutralization  Schematic

     2.  A chemical storage tank and feed pump will  be  provided  to pro-
         portion the neutralizing agent into the acid waste.   The chem-
         ical will be added to the system at the intake of  the pump.

     3.  An air lift type pump has been tentatively  selected  to  pull
         water from Pool 1 for discharge  to Pool 3.  This  type of pump-
         ing system has been selected to  minimize exposure  of equipment
         to the acidic water.  The air  lift action will  also  provide
         mixing for the neutralizing chemical and oxidation of the iron
         present in the mine drainage.

Initial regrading efforts will be moving  forward concurrently with the
neutralization process.  As material is forced  into  the upper reaches
of the pools, the water will be displaced and channeled to  the intake of
the neutralization facilities.

Planning has been based upon utilization  of calcium  hydroxide as the
alkaline chemical.  Considering measured  water  volumes  and  the present
acidity of the water, there are approximately 100 tons  of  acid to be
neutralized.  Allowing for an  increase  in acid  production  during the
regrading operations, an estimated  135  tons of  lime  are required for
neutrali zat ion.

Iron will generally be precipitated and settled  in  Pools 2 and 3.  As
the regrading nears completion and most of  the  water has been .eliminated
                                       30

-------
from the area, slight over-neutralization will  increase  the  pH  of  Pool  3
so that it can be drained without  relocating  the  neutralization plant.

Regrad ing

The recommended permanent channel  backfill  profile  grades  for the  pool
and pit areas are shown  in  Figures  8  and  10.  Also  illustrated  are the
existing ground and  channel  lines  along the  longitudinal axis of the
pits.

Deposits of a soft gelatinous  material, generally ranging  from  two to
four feet  in thickness,  exist  in the  bottoms  of the pools.   Experience
in other areas indicates this  material to be  extremely difficult to
handle by  conventional earthmoving  techniques.  The viscous  silty
material is fluid and difficult  to  dewater.   The  most appropriate  method
of releasing the contained  moisture  is to drain the water  from  the pool
leaving the soft deposits exposed  to  a winter of  freezing  and thawing to
break the  structure  of the  material and release the entrapped water.
This approach has been considered  for the study area.  However, as shown
in the profiles, the relative  elevations of  the pools require the  con-
struction  of deep temporary channels  through  the  present final  cut pits.
This construction would  be  costly  and the soft  material would probably
not provide a suitable platform  for conventional  excavation  equipment.
Recent soundings in  several  areas  indicate  the  occasional  presence of
bedrock, thus greatly increasing the  cost of  excavation.   For these
reasons, the concept of  draining and  leaving  the  semi-liquid silt  de-
posits exposed over  a winter season  is not  considered feasible.

Proposed grading and borrow areas  are shown  on  Figure 11.  The  general
grading pattern is depicted by slope  line schematics with  suggested
borrow areas outlined by dashed  lines.  Typical cross sections  for re-
commended  channel regrading along  existing  final  cuts and  haul  roads are
indicated  in Figures 12  and 13-  The  sections establish approximate
grading lines for final  shaping  but can be  varied somewhat to suit ma-
terials encountered  and  equipment  used.

As previously indicated, regrading  operations,  drainage, and acid
neutralization are to be conducted  concurrently.   As water in Pool  1
is treated and released, grading will  commence  at the upper  end of
Pool 7-  Removal of  the  water  will  be accomplished  by displacement
with material pushed from the  upper edge of  the spoil bank directly into
the pool,  using bulldozers  and/or  dragline  equipment.  The spoil material
should be  deposited  uniformly  along the north edge  of the  pit,  thus
forcing the gelatinous deposits  to  the south  edge of the pool and  high-
wall.  At  the same time, the deposited material will displace impounded
water which will drain into Pool 1  for subsequent treatment  and release.
                                31

-------
VjO
NJ
                                                                                                              I 000
                                                             SECTION A
                                             Figure  10  - Regraded Channel  Profile

-------
                                                   BACKFILL POOL NO  4 TO
                                                   SURROUNDING GROUND
                                                   ELEVATION
                                         WESTERN RESERVE ROAD
POOL NO. 2

 POOL NO.1
       BUILDINGS D  D
                 O
POSSIBLE BORROW
AREAS (TYP.)
                    CHANNEL GRADING LINES (TYP.)
                                     Figure II  -  Grading  Plan

-------
                                                                        EXISTING GROUND LINE
                                                                                                        , BORROW AREA
                                                                                                         (TYPICAL)
                                                                                                                                    VARY SLOPES TO
                                                                                                                                    SUIT BACKFILL
                                                                                                                                    REQUIREMENTS
                                                                                                                                  I?. WIN.  (TYPICAL)
                                                                                                       POOL NO.  I WATER
                                                                                                       LEVEL EL.  1180.5
                                                                                                                   PROPOSED CHANNEL BACKFILI
                                                                                                                   PROFILE (SEE FIG. 10)'
                                                                                                                                      20'  CHANNEL BOTTOM
                                                                                                                                      TYPICAL ALL SECTIONS
                                                                                       SECTION "A"  MAIN PIT  - POOL  NO. I
UJ
-C-
                                                                           -EXISTING GROUND LINE
                                                                                       POOL NO.  I WATER LEVEL
                                                                                       EL.  I ISO.5
                                                                                                                                                     PROPOSED CHANNEL BACKFILL
                                                                                                                                                     PROFILE (SEE FIG.8  )
                                                                                                                                                                         SCALE  IN FEET
                                                                                                                                                                         0     10    20

                                                                                                                                                                           "VERTICAL
                                                                                                                                                                         o    20    itp
                                                                                        SECTION "6" SOUTH  BRANCH -  POOL NO.  I
                                                                                                                                                                           HORIZONTAL
                                                                     Figure   12  -  Typical   Regraded  Sections

-------
  EXISTING GROUND
  LINE
 WATER LEVEL,  POOL NO.
 EL. I 180.5, POOL NO.  7
 EL. I 196.5 (DRY CHANNEL
 BED BETWEEN POOLS)
                        BORROW TO CONSTRUCT
                        CHANNEL SIDES ALONG
                        HIGH WALL (TYPICAL)
                          VARY SLOPE TO
                          SUIT BACKFILL
                          REQUIREMENTS
                 PROPOSED CHANNEL
                 BACKFILL PROFILE
                  SEE FIG. 10)
         SECTION  "C" - MAIN PIT POOL NO'S. I  TO 7
         EXISTING
         GROUND LINE
                                 -VARY SLOPES TO  SUIT CHANNEL
                                  BACKFILL REQUIREMENTS-
                   PROPOSED CHANNEL
                   BACKFILL PROFILE
                   (SEE FIG.  10)
                          POOL   NO.  6
                          WATER LEVEL
                          EL. I 196.5
                                             10
                                              I
                    20
                                                           I
 20
i i
                                                                      I
      VERTICLE SCALE IN FEET

SECTION "D"   POOL NO.  6
                                                            HORIZONTAL
                                                           SCALE  IN FEET
                 Figure  13 - Typical  Regraded Sections
Sufficient material  should be deposited in the  pits to provide an initial
channel  bed profile  approximately  two to three  feet above  that indicated
in Figure 10.  This  is to allow  for future settlement and  shrinkage since
direct  compaction  is not practical.  When Pool  7 has been  filled, the
same  procedure will  be followed  for Pools 6  and 1.

After the channel  profile grade  has been established, construction of
side  slopes and  rough shaping of the 20-foot channel bottom will proceed.
It is  recommended  that material  be scraped from both the high  wall and
spoil  pile sides with the better quality overburden material  placed on
top.   Whenever possible clay should be packed against the  high wall to
minimize the exposure of acid sandstone to atmospheric conditions.
                                  35

-------
It is anticipated that due to dumping of spoil  into pools of water,  the
center portion of the channel will settle and require additional  grading
at a later date.  Caution must be exercised in  the use of heavy  compac-
tion and excavation equipment in the pit area since the material  is
likely to remain in a soft condition for an extended period.   It  is  sug-
gested that at least one year elapse before final grading and  planting
along channel beds be concluded.

Table 5 indicates the approximate quantities of earth backfill  required
along various lengths of the pit area.  In estimating these quantities
variable shrinkage factors were used reflecting the expected conditions
in each location.

                              TABLE 5

                        BACKFILL QUANTITIES

         Location                                Backfill Required
                                                     Cu. Yd.

     Pool  1 - Main Pit                               83,000
     Pool  I - South Branch                           85,000
     Pool  3                                           1,000
     Pool  4                                           1,000
     Pool  6                                          12,000
     Pool  7                                         117,000
     Dry ,Bed Areas
       Between Pools 1 & 7                           22,000

                     TOTAL ESTIMATED BACKFILL       320,000

Revegetation

Spoil in the project area is very acid, relatively high in sulfate,
manganese, aluminum, and soluble salts but rather low in essential plant
nutrients.  Table 6 indicates the results of surface soil tests  taken
in 1967 by Kent State University and specifically for this report early
in 1971.

                              TABLE 6

                           SOIL ANALYSES

     Element        Plot #1            Plot #2           Plot  #3
                 August   April     August   April        April
                  1967     1971      1967     1971         1971
     pH            3.2      3.6       3.8      3.5          3.6
     NO,           1.4      1.8      34.3      1.6          2.1

-------
     Element
     NH

     P2°5
     K20

     Ca

     Mg

     Fe

     Mn

     B

     Cu

     Zn

     Al
     Soluble
     Salts
    Plot #1
   Plot #2
August
1967
42.0
0.6
26.0
142.0
60.0
1.3
16.0
0.4
0.5
0.2
1.0
232.0
Apri 1
1971
25.0
1.6
22.0
34.0
32.0
0.3
2.6
0.3
2.8
2.3
29.0
137.0
August
1967
84.0
0.8
191.0
560.0
110.0
0.3
9.8
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.4
184.0
Apri 1
1971
30.0
1.2
31.0
28.0
50.0
0.3
4.5
0.4
3.0
4.9
40.0
131.0
1700.0    360.0
980.0    440.0
Plot #3
 Apri 1
  1971

  28.0

   1.3
  26.0
  46.0
  40.0
   0.4
   3.6
   0.3
   2.2
   4.4
  37.0
 118.0

 400.0
     Note:  All quantities except pH expressed  in pounds per acre.

Soluble salt content of stripped mined  lands serves as a good  indicator
of plant toxicity.  Most species of domestic plants have a maximum
tolerance level of about 2,000  Ibs. of  salts per acre.  Soluble salts
at the area were well below  the maximum level  in 1971, but judging  from
the  low pH,  it  is  reasonable to expect  that when the  spoil  is  regraded,
soluble salts will increase  drastically and may approach 3,000  Ibs. per
acre.  Thus, the following steps are recommended to assure adequate
survival of new plantings.

Furrow Grading - After completion of spoil movement to provide  the
desired channel profile, furrow grading of side slopes is recommended.
This technique encourages rapid leaching of soluble salts and  creates
a soil structure in the furrows which has been shown  to encourage plant
growth.  Furrows should always  follow the contour and are recommended  to
be 24 to 30 inches in height  and 48 inches between the peaks.   Furrow
grading can be accomplished  by  permitting the  spoil to fall off the end
of an angled dozer blade or  a ripper may be used in tight spoil.   If ex-
cessive rock is encountered,  a  Rome disc may be required for this spe-
cialized grading operation.   Furrow grading is the key to leaching  out
the salts prepatory to successful revegetation.  Grading should be  com-
pleted in early fall to permit  leaching through the fall and winter seasons,

Ferti1ization - Furrow grading will provide a  suitable soil structure
and retain available moisture for plant utilization.  Fertilizing the
                                37

-------
spoil surface is required to provide the  initial push  for  tree  and  grass
cover.  A complete (10-10-10) fertilizer  is  recommended  over  the  entire
spoil area at the rate of 600 Ibs. per acre.  Application  with  a  hydro-
seeder or hydro-mulcher at the time of seeding  is also recommended.

The extremely high acidity of the spoil must be corrected  before  a
vegetative cover can be established.  A minimum pH of  k.O  to  ^t.5  is  desir-
able, an increase over present levels of  approximately one unit.  Agri-
cultural lime should be applied at the rate  of three tons  per acre  and
mixed into the top three to four  inches of spoil.  Areas which  have  been
furrow graded will receive the same lime  application,  but  without subse-
quent surface mixing.

Plantings - Plant materials have  been selected for acid  tolerance, wild-
life benefits, and aesthetic value.  Trees and shrubs  will  be planted at
the rate of 1,600 seedlings per acre.  This  relatively high density  will
allow for some mortality due to adverse conditions;  improve the visual
appearance of the area more quickly; enhance the soil  conditions  more
rapidly by adding organic matter  and nitrogen; and use more moisture
(evapo-transpiration) thereby reducing erosion and runoff.

Two tree-shrub mixtures are proposed.  The standard mixture will  consist
of the following number of plants per acre:

         ^00 Black Locust
         kOO Black Alder
         100 Red Oak
         300 Silver Maple
         200 Autumn 01ive
         100 False Indigo or Rose Acacia
         100 Cottonwood

A second mixture with increased autumn olive and false indigo or  rose
acacia is suggested to improve wildlife food and habitat.  The  wildlife
mixture will consist of the following plants per acre:

         300 Black Locust
         200 Black Alder
         100 Red Oak
         100 SiIver Maple
         500 Autumn Olive
         300 False Indigo or Rose Acacia
         100 Cottonwood

Some white pine and Norway spruce may be  scattered near  the roads for
aesthetic purposes.

Trees should be carefully planted the spring following regrading  opera-
tion.  Plants should be spaced approximately 5 to 6 feet apart  and  placed
in the ravine and lower slopes of the furrow graded areas.  Plants  should
                                38

-------
be at  least  two-year-old  seedlings  grown  under  climatic  conditions  similar
to Mahoning  County.  Trees  and  shrubs will  be hand  planted  using  conven-
tional approved methods of  reforestation.

Black  locust will  provide quick cover but  can only  be  expected  to last
five to ten  years  due  to  inevitable infestation  by  locust borers.   After
the locust has served  its purpose,  the  canopy will  open  and alder will  re-
place  the  locust as  the dominant tree.  Autumn  olive and false  indigo
will reseed  as a thicket  or hedge cover in  the  ravines and  provide  excel-
lent wildlife benefits.

The entire spoil surface  must be heavily  seeded,  at the  rate of 30  pounds
per acre,  to insure  rapid revegetation.   Fertilizer, seed,  and  mulching
material  (1,500  Ibs/acre) should be applied with  hydro-seeding  equipment.
This planting technique will conserve moisture  and  produce  conditions
favorable  for germination,  and  for  erosion  control.

The recommended seeding mixture includes  the following grass species:

          10  Ibs. Blackwell  Switchgrass
           5  Ibs. Birdsfoot  Trefoil
           5  Ibs. Alsike Clover
          10  Ibs. Kentucky Fescue "31"

A revegetation plan  as shown in Figure  14  has been  developed to accomplish
the primary  goal of  acid  mine drainage  abatement  and also to provide wild-
life and  recreational  benefits.   The final  cut  area and  fringe  areas of
the spoil  surface  should  be planted with  the wildlife  mixture to  provide
a transition with  the  existing  vegetation  and to  improve the natural
habitat.   The ravine formed by  the  final  cut area should be allowed to
develop as a thicket for  wildlife cover and protection.  The upland areas
of the project site  should  be planted with  the  standard  plant mixture.
This mixture consists  of  additional shade  type  species which are  desir-
able for  recreational  activities such as  picnicking, camping, and hik-
ing.   The  entire spoil surface  will be  seeded with  the suggested  grass
mixture.

Land Use Redevelopment

Upon completion of the reclamation  of the Upper Meander  Creek site,  the
area will have public  recreational  potential for  primitive  camping,  pic-
nicking, and hiking.  Mahoning  County,  based on the 1970 Lakeshore  Upland
Region Report of the Ohio Outdoor Recreation Plan,  has a need for develop-
ment of approximately 4,000 acres for land-based  activities.  Recreational
needs  for Mahoning County residents  are currently being  satisfied in the
surrounding  counties.  Development  of the study area for land-based  rec-
reational activities would  provide  needed facilities within a shorter
driving distance and establish  a worthwhile use for the  reclamation  area.
                                39

-------
-t-
o
                      j    AGRICULTURAL

                     /    RE-USE
                                                 Figure  H -  Revegetation  Plan

-------
The Sheban property  (northwest quarter, Section 2)  involves approxi-
mately 160 acres, which after reclamation, will be moderately rolling
with a ravine in the final cut area.  The site  is somewhat  isolated
from the Youngstown metropolitan area, but should provide an excellent
retreat from urban development.  Recreational features should be  lim-
ited to primitive camping and picnicking facilities with trails winding
through the entire area.  Revegetation has been planned to  accommodate
recreational development as well as provide wildlife benefits in  the
ravine and nondeveloped areas.  Figure 15 schematically illustrates a
possible plan for the reuse of the project area.  Recreational develop-
ment, as shown,  includes access roads, parking, water, sanitary facil-
ities, camping push-offs, trails, picnic tables, and fire grills.

Trail development could accommodate hiking, horseback riding, and bicycl-
ing in the spring, summer, and fall months, and snowmobiling in the
winter.  This type of utilization would encourage year-round use  and
increase the recreational benefits of the reclamation project.  Inter-
pretive displays illustrating surface mining1operations, reclamation
techniques, and  nature appreciation could be provided along the hiking
system.  Outdoor classrooms would also be beneficial for educational
experimentation  and  instruction.

Program Surveillance

For demonstration of the effectiveness of the proposed mine drainage
abatement program, a limited amount of monitoring and analysis of water
discharging from the area will be required.  An early element of  the
improvement effort will  involve installation of a flow metering and
recording structure and sampling station to monitor all normal flows
from the area.   This facility will be located near  Stratton Road  where
the entire study area outflow  is in a common channel and there is
relatively easy  access for servicing the metering equipment.

Continuous  recording instrumentation is anticipated to provide a  com-
plete permanent  record of the flow rate from the study area.  An  auto-
matic proportioning  sampler will extract a  representative sample  of the
discharge stream for subsequent analysis.   Schedules will be established
for servicing metering equipment and analyzing  the  water sample on a
once per week basis.  More frequent sampling will,  of course, be  poss-
ible  if desirable to better define characteristics  of the discharge
stream.  Recommended routine analysis of composite  samples  includes the
following parameters:

         Acidity
         pH
         Conductivity
          I ron
         Sulfate
         Total and Dissolved Solids

-------
                                                                POOL NO. 5
                                                                                    POOL NO.  2
AGRICULTURAL   -,^

LAND      f AGRICULTURAL
         /    RE-USE
  LEGEND


  REGRADED CHANNEL

PARK INC




EXISTING  VEGETATI ON
                                                                                                   EXISTING GRASSLAND WITH
                                                                                                   SCATTERED TREE  COVER
                                                                                                   PROPOSED VEGETATION
                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                       500
                                                                                                                1000
                                                                                                   SCALE  IN FEET
                                      Figure  15  - Land  Use Redevelopment

-------
The Mahoning Valley Sanitary District Routinely patrols the Meander
Creek Watershed to protect the integrity of the source of supply for
their water treatment facility.   It  is recommended that the District be
considered for responsibility for servicing of recording instruments and
analysis of water samples.

The final phase of program surveillance will involve an evaluation of
the data collected and a summary  report on the abatement project.  This
phase of activity will be deferred until adequate operating records are
available to establish trends in mine drainage production from the proj-
ect site.  Routine flow monitoring and sample analysis will continue
for a minimum of two and possibly as many as four or five years from the
completion of construction to provide time for the system to stabilize
and for adequate records to be accumulated.

Emergency Procedures

It has been previously indicated that all possible precautions will be
taken during the period of actual regrading and reclamation work in the
area to assure that no slugs of acid contaminated water are discharged
to Meander Creek, or that any other  adverse environmental conditions
develop.  Upon completion of the project, there will be no large stand-
ing bodies of water which could easily be released to cause damages
downstream.

Discharges from the area will be  routinely monitored.  Any developing
hazardous condition will be flagged  and appropriate emergency procedures
developed to cope with the particular situation.  Beyond this effort,
no specific emergency procedures  are required for the project area.

Cost Estimate
A cost estimate has been prepared  for each of the elements  in the total
mine drainage abatement program.   These costs are summarized  in Table 7.

                              TABLE  7

                       PROGRAM COST ESTIMATE

Neutralization
     Equipment and Set-up                    $  3,000
     Chemicals, Operation  &  Maintenance         8,000
                                                          11 ,000
Regrading
     Excavation                               96,000
     Furrow Grading                           15,000
     Fine Grading of  Channel                  10,000
                                                         121 ,000

-------
Revegetation
     Surface Preparation, Liming
       and Ferti1ization                       8,000
     Hydro-Seeding and Mulching               36,000
     Tree and Shrub Plantings                 20,000
                                                         64,000
Program Surveillance
     Flow Control  Structure and Equipment      5,000
     Routine Flow Monitoring                   5,000
     Engineering and Resident Supervision
       of Construction                        24,000
     Administration                            5,000
     Final  Project Report                     10,000
                                                         49,000
Contingency                                              25,000

         TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST                  $270,000

No land acquisition costs have been included in the summary.   It has been
assumed that the land will be made available for public ownership.  Water
and mineral rights will accompany the land transfer.

The temporary neutralization system to be employed during the  release
of the presently impounded water has previously been described.  Opera-
tion over a span of approximately four months has been anticipated with
supervision of approximately four hours per day required.  Since this
work must be closely coordinated with the regrading operation, it would
be advantageous for this activity to be handled by the same agency with
responsibility for the earthmoving.

The single largest cost item in the proposed improvement program is for
excavation.  The $96,000 cost figure represents 320,000 cubic  yards of
excavation at a cost of 30 cents per yard.  This relatively low unit
price for earth moving assumes that the work will be done by a local pub-
lic agency.  The costs as presented, therefore, represent the  actual
costs incurred by the agency and do not include any provision  for profit.

Furrow grading is separate and in addition to the general excavation
costs.  A unit cost of $300 per acre has been used for estimating pur-
poses.  The item for finish grading of the channel represents  the cost
necessary to return to the site after approximately one year to repair
places of unequal  settlement and to generally shape up the area.

Costs as presented for revegetation are typical of contract awards for
this type of work.  It has been assumed that surface preparation, lim-
ing, fertilization and all revegetation will be awarded as a single
contract.

-------
A flow control structure, flow recording equipment and a water sampler
will be installed in the outlet channel near Strattori Road.  Weekly
servicing of the monitoring equipment  is anticipated and a total  of
four manhours work per week over a three-year span have been allocated
for this effort.

Minimal engineering design costs have been included in the project sum-
mary based on the assumption that work will generally be performed on a
force account basis with a minimum of contract type plans and specifica-
tions.  A resident engineer on the site for four months represents the
majority of this cost item.  This individual  will have wide responsibility
for seeing that the project is constructed in general  conformance with the
concepts outlined herein.

Lump sum allocations have been made for overall administration and for
development of a final report on the demonstration project.  Approxi-
mately ten percent has been included as a contingency.

Construction of recreational facilities conforming to the suggested devel-
opmental plan will be the responsibility of the agency retaining  ultimate
control over the site.  Costs for this work have not been included in the
project summary.

Cost Comparison

To provide a frame of reference for the recommended implementation approach,
costs have also been estimated for completion of the necessary construc-
tion activity on a general contract basis rather than the previously recom-
mended force account type of operation.  Table 8 illustrates the  comparison
between the two approaches.

                             TABLE 8

                         COST COMPARISON

                                    Force Account     General Contract

Neutralization                         $ 11,000           $ 16,000
Regrading                               121,000            182,000
Revegetation                             64,000             64,000
Program Surveillance                     49,000             70,000
Contingency                              25>000             48,000

    TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST       $270,000           $380,000

The neutralization and regrading elements of the program have been
increased to reflect inclusion of a contractor's normal profit and
overhead costs.  Job mobilization and move-in factors have also been
considered.  The revegetation element was previously estimated on a
contract basis, so no change is indicated for this item.   In the
                                45

-------
program surveillance aspect, overhead and profit have likewise been
included in the construction of the flow control structure.   The
routine flow monitoring and administration will  not change signifi
cantly since these items will  not be included in a general construc-
tion contract.

Engineering and resident supervision of construction would be increased
somewhat if a general  contract were awarded.   More definitive construc-
tion documents  would be required to satisfy necessary contractual  ar-
rangements.  The contingency factor has been  increased to 15 percent in
the general contract situation.

Considering all of the foregoing elements, a  cost savings of approxi-
mately $110,000 is indicated for the project  if  construction is  imple-
mented on a force account basis.

-------
                  PART V - PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS


Demonstration Value

A successful mine drainage abatement project at the Upper Meander Creek
site will provide a number of public benefits.  The study area is pre-
sently of little value to anyone and has imposed inconvenience and
expense on  local private property owners, several governmental agencies,
and approximately 275,000 residents of Mahoning and Trumbul1  Counties.

The proposed project will demonstrate a number of procedures  for treat-
ment of an acid mine drainage problem and reclamation a despoiled area.
Following are the specific aspects of the program leading to resolution
of the problems at the site.

     1.  Elimination of the standing pools of acidic water and partial
         filling of the old final cut area will demonstrate the effect
         of providing positive drainage for a mined region.  Immediate
         reduction of the average rate of discharge from the  area is
         antici pated.

     2.  Effective techniques for establishing vegetative cover on
         acidic spoil material will also be demonstrated.  Furrow
         grading, applications of fertilizer and lime, and selective
         planting of trees, grasses, and shrubs will have immediate
         impact on water quality.  Plants will utilize a significant
         portion of the precipitation falling on the area which now
         runs off rapidly.  The grading techniques proposed will  de-
         monstrate the ability to retain water on the slopes  and
         thereby reduce the transport of sediment into the stream
         channels.

     3.  The final phase of the program provides for demonstration of
         the beneficial use which may be derived from an area which,
         in its current unreclaimed state, is a detriment to the entire
         region.

The Upper Meander Creek site  is an excellent candidate for a demonstra-
tion project; the area is small enough to easily observe and evaluate
overall effectiveness, yet large enough to fully demonstrate mine
drainage abatement and reclamation techniques.

Water Quality Improvements

In addition to the demonstration value afforded by the proposed project,
a specific troublesome surface water pollution problem will be abated.
Discharge from the area is presently in violation of adopted water qua-
lity criteria; the pH is too  low and the dissolved solids concentration
is excessive.

-------
Procedures outlined herein for temporary neutralization of the impounded
water will satisfy stream criteria with regard to pH level; however,
dissolved solids in the stream leaving the area will remain high during
the neutralization process.

Longer range water quantity characteristics are extremely difficult to
predict.   Immediate results of the regrading phase of the program should
be a reduced volume of discharge of surface flow from the mine area.
The complexities of the hydrologic system defy any rigorous calculation
of the net reduction likely to be achieved.  However, it would be reason-
able to expect that the net outflow might be cut by up to one-half as
soon as the ground water table has stabilized.  Longer term it is pos-
sible that the discharge from the area will be reduced to an intermittent
basis with flow occurring during and after precipitation events and dur-
ing extended wet periods.  At other times, there may be little or no
water in the stream channel.

Water quality characteristics are similarly difficult to establish in
advance.   It is anticipated that during the construction phase, addi-
tional acidic material  will  be uncovered and the stream flow may exhibit
a net increase in acid concentration for a period of time.  However,
after the initial rapid leaching and following the application of lime,
fertilizer seed, and mulch,  the quality of surface run-off should rapidly
improve.   This improvement will continue as plant growth is established
to retain and utilize moisture on the surface of the spoil bank, and as
a good soil  mantel develops  to reduce the exposure of new acidic material
via erosion.  Water quality characteristics may be improved by as much
as 25 percent during the first full year following completion of the
demonstration project.   Longer term, 80 to 90 percent improvement in
five to eight years is  a reasonable objective.

Strict compliance with  water quality criteria will not be immediate;
however,  the proposed demonstration program contains all necessary fea-
tures to minimize immediate damage to the downstream aquatic environment
and to provide long-term improvement in the discharge from the area.

Cost Savings

The most apparent public benefit to be derived from the proposed recla-
mation project is reduction of undesirable water entering Meander Creek
Reservoir.  The partial elimination of acidic influent water will imme-
diately reduce water treatment costs to the Mahoney Valley Sanitary Dis-
trict.

Sanitary  District personnel  have calculated that the treatment of acidity
and hardness in the water originating in the study area represents a
total annual cost in excess  of $35,700.   On the basis of previously
presented assessments of mine drainage characteristics and improvements,
water treatment savings approaching $9,000 per year may be realized by
the second year following completion of the demonstration project.

-------
Further water quality improvements should ultimately result in annual
savings of over $30,000 as the full effectiveness of the demonstration
techniques are realized.  The savings to the district will undoubtedly
influence water rates for the entire water service area.

Other direct monetary benefits will result from the project but these
accrue more to private property owners and less to the general public.
Considerable expense and concern to the owners of the recreational im-
poundments in the downstream watershed has occurred in the past.  Im-
proved water quality in Meander Creek will reduce the cost for damage
prevention measures and allow the owners of the recreational facilities
to assure potential patrons of good water quality.  Elimination of the
large impoundments at the Sheban site also eliminates the present flood
threat and therefore further adds to the general benefits for the down-
stream pub lie.

Aesthetics, Fish and Wildlife

Reclamation of the project area will improve the aesthetics of the pre-
sently derelict land and remove a scar from the Goshen Township land-
scape.  Reclamation will provide recreational opportunities, create
wildlife habitat, and ultimately provide social benefits for the entire
Mahoning County area.

The improved water quality downstream from the mined site will restore
and rehabilitate the aquatic environment of Meander Creek.  The improved
water will again sustain fish and aquatic plant life.  Soil conditions
should also improve, thus allowing  land plants  (trees, shrubs, and
grasses) to be re-established along the stream.  The improved water qua-
lity and vegetative cover will encourage the return of wildlife to the
Meander Creek area and  improve the aesthetics of the entire natural cor-
ri dor.

-------
              PART VI - IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION
Project Responsibility

Designation of specific individuals and agencies to carry forward with
the proposed project has not been possible pending resolution of property
ownership difficulties.  Although no specific delegation of authority or
responsibility can be made at the present time, following is a breakdown
of project work elements to the three agencies having the most direct
interest and concern with the demonstration program.

     1.  Ohio Department of Natural Resources - This  agency should main-
         tain responsibility for development of financial arrangement,
         submission of an application for federal demonstration grant
         funds, and overall administration of the demonstration program.
         Financial participation may also be provided.

     2.  Mahoning County - Ultimate ownership of the  property and the
         development of long-range utilization potential should be the
         responsibility of Mahoning County through the Board of Commis-
         sioners.  Interest has also been expressed by the Commissioners
         in financial participation by providing personnel and equipment
         for all or part of the regrading portion of  the program.  The
         temporary water neutralization facilities could logically be
         handled by the same personnel-.

     3.  Mahoning County Sanitary District - Routine  monitoring of water
         quality and servicing of recording instruments might easily be
         provided by the Sanitary District.  Some consideration might
         also be given to having this agency provide  for neutralization
         of the impounded water as an alternative to  having this work
         element performed by county forces.

From the foregoing,  it  is apparent that two key factors must take place
if the demonstration program is to move ahead.  First, the private pro-
perty must be transferred to public ownership so that the State can
legally request partial federal financing.  This is an Ohio requirement
and not a stipulation of the federal demonstration program.   Secondly,
an agency or individual must take the  initiative in developing the nec-
essary administrative and financing structure to move forward with the
program.

Program Schedule

Figure 16 outlines a schedule under which the various elements of the
program may be undertaken.  As shown, July and August of  1971 have been
allotted for transfer of the property  to  the necessary public ownership,
for finalizing funding arrangements at local and federal  levels, and  to
establish the necessary administrative and construction  features for  full
implementation of the program.
                              51

-------
                    SEPT.-NOV.,1971    MARCH-APRIL.1972  ,  SEPTEMBER 1972  ,  PCf.-DEC. .I 973
      COMPLETE PROPERTY   AREA REGRAOING

         TRANSFER


      FINALIZE FUNDING VwATER NEUTRAL IZATIONV   PLANTING AND  ^  FINE GRADING  f*.   FINAL PROJECT
      " ARRANGEMENTS   >f            ^"^  SEEDING     v  OF CHANNEL    "  REPORT


      ESTABLISH    / \	WATER QUALITY MONITORING
7
       ADMINISTRATION AND
       CONSTRUCTION
       FEATURES
                        Figure  16  -  Program Schedule

Regrading of  the area and concurrent neutralization  of the impounded
water has been  scheduled for September, October,  and November of  197'•
This  is a key interval in the  program.  For best  results, planting  must
be done  in  the  spring, therefore,  regrading activity should be  completed
the preceding fall  to allow a  period for stabilization of the soil  sur-
face  prior  to planting.  If preliminary efforts cannot be moved forward
rapidly enough  to permit regrading  in the fall of  1971, it may  be neces-
sary  to defer the planting activity, which is scheduled for March and
April of  1972,  for  a full year.

Establishment of a  flow monitoring  station and the  necessary procedures
for routine servicing of the station should be initiated with the start
of the regrading activities or earlier if possible.   This effort  should
continue  as long as necessary  to  fully demonstrate  the effectiveness  of
the project.

Final grading of the channel to dress up the area  and remove the  points
of unequal  settlement has been scheduled for the  fall of 1972.  Depending
on actual conditions at that time,  it may be desirable to defer this
activity  for  another year.

The last  item scheduled is preparation of a final  report on the demon-
stration  project.  This has been  scheduled for late  1973-  It may,  how-
ever, be  desirable  to allow an additional year or more for data accumu-
lation prior  to producing this final document.
                                  52

-------
                    PART VII - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS



During the course of the preparation of this feasibility study, a number
of agencies and individuals have been contacted.  The willingness on the
part of all persons contacted to discuss the problem and to cooperate in
developing a workable solution attests to the desirability of undertaking
a demonstration program in the area.  Contacts have included:

    1.  Ohio Department of Natural Resources.

    2.  Ohio Department of Health.

    3.  Mahoning County Board of Commissioners.

    4.  Mahoning Valley Sanitary District.

    5.  Mahoning County Soil and Water Conservation District.

    6.  Mahoning County Regional Planning Commission.

Dr. C. V. Riley of Kent State University served as a special consultant
to Stanley Consultants during the feasibility study.
A significant objective of this project was to prepare a pilot feasibility
study in accordance with the EPA manual "Feasibility Study Manual - Mine
Water Pollution Control Demonstrations".  Such feasibility studies are re-
quired by Section 14 of the Water Pollution Control Act, as amended.   Thus,
this report will serve as a guide to future feasibility studies.   This project
of EPA was conducted under the direction of the Pollution Control Analysis
Program, Ernst P- Hall, Chief, and Donald J. O'Bryan, Jr., Project Officer.
                                53

-------
     Accession Number
                            Subject Field & Group
                                                SELECTED  WATER  RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
                                                      INPUT TRANSACTION  FORM
     Organization
       Environmental Protection Agency,  Office of Research  & Monitoring (Federal Office)
       Stanley Consultants  (Contractor)
     Till.
       feasibility Study
       Upper Meander Creek Mine Drainage Abatement Project
 10
Authors)

  Anderson, R.  H.
16
                                        Project Designation
                                                         14010 HBQ
                                    2]  Note
 22
     Citation
     Descriptors (Starred First)
       *feasibility studies/ *mine drainage/  * abatement/ *acid mine water/
       water pollution control/ water  quality
 25
Identifiers (Starred First)

  * mine drainage  abatement/ demonstration project
 27 Abstract
       This  report presents an evaluation  of the feasibility of a mine drainage  control
       demonstration project for the Upper Meander Creek site which has been  extensively
       surfaced mined for coal in Mahoning County, Ohio.

       The general features of the recommended program include the following  steps:

          1.   Elimination of standing pools of acidic water.
          2.   Regrading of the final cut  to provide positive drainage from the  area.
          3.   Preparation of a suitable seed bed and planting of acid tolerant  grasses,
               plants, and trees.
          4.   Implementation of beneficial land use features following successful
               reclamation.  This phase will be the responsibility of the  agency
               retaining permanent control of the area and has not been included as
               part of the federally-aided demonstration.
Abstractor
      Carl  Myers
                              Institution
                                          Environmental Protection Agency
 WR:102  (REV. JULY 1969)
 WRSIC
                                           SEND TO' WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
                                                  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                  WASHINGTON. D. C. 20240

                                                                           * GPO: 1969-359-339

-------