-------
U,S. Environmental Protection Agency
-------
DCN No. 85-203-024-27-03
Contract Nos. 68-02-3515
68-02-3889
68-02-3816
68-02-6558 (Subcontract No. 130.110)
ANALYSIS OF NEW SOURCE REVIEW
(NSR) PERMITTING EXPERIENCE PART 2
FINAL REPORT
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)
Office of Planning and Program Evaluation (OPPE)
Washington, D.C.
and
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)
Durham, North Carolina
Prepared by:
L. C. Hayes, Project Manager
M. A. Baviello
L. A. Bravo
D. 0. Fulenwider
G. C. Giguere
Radian Corporation
3200 East Chapel Hi IT Road/Progress Center
Post Office Box 13000
Re_s.earchrJ»iangle Park, North Carolina 27709
September 1985
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This report was prepared for the Office of Air and Radiation (OAR),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. by Radian Corporation
under Contract Numbers 68-02-3515 and 68-02-3889. The EPA Project Officer
was Mr. George Sugiyama, and the Project Technical Advisor was
Mr. Mike Trutna.
Data presented concerning regional comparisons of permitted allowable
emissions rates were developed by Radian under Contract Number 68-02-6558,
Subcontract Number 130.110, for which Mr. Steve Green of EPA's Office of
Planning and Program Evaluation was the Project Officer. Data presented in
this report concerning effects of New Source Performance Standards on New
Source Review was performed by Radian Corporation under Contract
Number 68-02-3816, for which Mr. John Crenshaw was the Project Officer.
The Radian Project Manager was Mr. Leigh Hayes. Ms. Mary Ann Baviello
coordinated data gathering and coding, as well as other project activities.
Computer and statistical analyses were performed by Mr. Luis Bravo,
Ms. Donna Fulenwider and Mr. Greg Giguere. Data were extracted from permit
files by M.A. Baviello, K. Fidler, A. Schmidt, D. Pusch, S. Langevin,
P. Beekley, and D. Wells.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 THE NEW (1984) DATA BASE 5
2.1 Data Base Characterization 5
2.1.1 Chronology of PSD Application Submittals 5
2.1.2 Permit Application Review Agencies 8
2.1.3 Emissions Associated with PSD Applications ... 8
2.2 PSD Applicability 13
2.2.1 Source Applicability 13
2.2.2 Pollutant Applicability 13
3.0 PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING TIMES 24
3.1 Total Processing Time 24
3.2 Application Completeness 24
4.0 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACT) DECISIONS AND
EMISSION LIMITATIONS 28
4.1 NSPS Coverage of PSD Emissions 30
4.1.1 Distribution by EPA Region 30
4.1.2 Distribution by Source Type 37
4.2 Stringency of BACT Decision-Making 38
4.2.1 Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS by Source
T*Pe 40
4.2.2 Chronologic Comparison of BACT to NSPS
Allowable Emission Rates ,-,
-------
Chapter Page
4.3 Regional Comparison of BACT Decision-Making 54
4.4 Control Technology Alternatives 65
4.4.1 Frequency of Control Technology
Al ternati ve Analyses ....;...-.--.-^-TTT-.-.-.r-rr-r-.~TV 81
4.4.2 Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) of
Control Technology Alternatives 87
5.0 EFFECTS OF AIR QUALITY CONSTRAINTS ON EMISSION
REDUCTIONS BEYOND NSPS 89
APPENDICES
Appendix Page
A PSD Permit Applications in 1984 Data Base A-l
B Coding Sheets and Code Explanations B-l
C Distribution of NSPS/BACT Emissions for Named and
Other PSD Sources C-1
D Comparisons of BACT Emission Rates D-l
E Chronology of BACT/NSPS Emission Rates E-l
m
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table
2-1 Distribution of PSD Permit Applications by Region
and by State 6
2-2 Data Base Emission Summary: Total Emission
Increases and Net Emission Changes by EPA Region 11
2-3 Comparison of Total and Utility PSD Emission Increases
for the Original and Updated PSD Data Bases 12
2-4 Distribution of PSD Permit Applications by Source
Type Within Each Region 14
2-5 Distribution of PSD Permit Applications by Project
Description Type 16
2-6 Distribution of the Number of PSD Pollutant Reviews by
Pollutant and by Region 18
2-7 Distribution of Particulate Matter Emissions Subject to
NSR/PSD Permitting Between 1981 and 1985 19
2-8 Distribution of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Subject
to NSR/PSD Permitting Between 1981 and 1985 20
2-9 Distribution of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Subject
to NSR/PSD Permitting Between 1981 and 1985 21
2-10 Distribution of Carbon Monoxide Emissions Subject
to NSR/PSD Permitting Between 1981 and 1985 22
2-11 Distribution of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
Subject to NSR/PSD Permitting Between 1981 and 1985 23
3-1 Summary of PSD Permit Processing Time (Initial
Application Submittal to Permit Issuance) by
EPA Region 25
3-2 Summary of PSD Permit Processing Time (Submittal
of a Complete Application to Permit Issuance) by
EPA Region ..
IV
-------
Table
4-1 Distribution of Nationwide NSPS and Non-NSPS Emissions
(in Tons/Year) Associated with All Source Types
in Data Base 31
4-2a Comparison of Utility and Non-Utility Source Emission
Reductions Beyond NSPS -~.: . ;-rrrr-.~~.----.-.-rrr.-TT-.--.-. rwT-v-m41
4-2b Comparison of Total and Utility BACT Emission
Reductions Beyond NSPS for the Original and Updated
PSD Data Bases 41
4-3 NSPS and BACT Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with
those Emission Units that are Subject to NSPS for
Particulate Matter 42
4-4 NSPS and BACT Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with
those Emission Units that are Subject to NSPS for
Sulfur Dioxide 43
4-5 NSPS and BACT Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with
those Emission Units that are Subject to NSPS for
Nitrogen Oxides 44
4-6 NSPS and BACT Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with
those Emission Units that are Subject to NSPS for
,Carbon Monoxide 45
4-7 NSPS and BACT Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with
those Emission Units that are Subject to NSPS for
Volati1e Organic Compounds 46
4-8 Number of Emission Units Subject to NSPS for
Particulate Matter at NSPS Rate and Below NSPS Rate 48
4-9 Number of Emission Units Subject to NSPS for
Sulfur Dioxide at NSPS Rate and Below NSPS Rate 49
4-10 Number of Emission Units Subject to NSPS for
Nitrogen Oxides at NSPS Rate and Below NSPS Rate 50
4-11 Number of Emission Units Subject to NSPS for
Carbon Monoxide at NSPS Rate and Below NSPS Rate 51
4-12 Number of Emission Units Subject to NSPS for
Volatile Organic Compounds at NSPS Rate and Below
NSPS Rate 52
-------
Table
4-13 Mean Particulate Matter BACT Emission Rates for
Industrial Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type, Boiler Size
and EPA Regi on ................. ......................... 57
_4-_14 _ Mean Sulfur Dioxide BACT Emission Rates for Industrial
Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type, Boiler Size and
EPA Region ............................................... 58
4-15 Mean Nitrogen Oxide BACT Emission Rates for Industrial
Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type, Boiler Size and EPA
Region [[[ 59
4-16 Mean Carbon Monoxide BACT Emission Rates for Industrial
Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type, Boiler Size and EPA
Region [[[ 60
4-17 Mean Volatile Organic Compound BACT Emission Rates
for Industrial Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type,
Boiler Size and EPA Region ............................... 61
4-18 Mean Particulate Matter BACT Emission Rates for
Utility Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type, Boiler Size and
EPA Region ............................................... 62
4-19 Mean Sulfur Dioxide BACT Emission Rates for
Utility Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type, Boiler Size and
EPA Regi on ............................................... 63
4-20 Mean Nitrogen Oxide BACT Emission Rates for
Utility Boilers Segregated by Fuel Type, Boiler Size and
EPA Regi on ............................................... 64
4-21 Particulate Matter BACT Decisions, Control Alternatives,
and Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) Data for
Emission Units for which at Least One Control
Alternative was Analyzed ................................. 55
4-22 Sulfur Dioxide BACT Decisions, Control Alternatives
and Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) Data for
Emission Units for which at Least One Control
Alternative was Analyzed .........................
4-23 Nitrogen Oxide BACT Decisions, Control Alternatives
and Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) Data for '
-------
Table ^
4-24 Carbon Monoxide BACT Decisions, Control Alternatives,
and Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) Data for
Emission Units for which at Least One Control
Alternative was Analyzed 79
-4-25 Volatile Organic Compound BACT Decisions, Control -
Alternatives, and Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE)
Data for Emission Units for which at Least One Control
Alternative was Analyzed 80
4-26 Number of PM Control Alternatives in BACT Decisions
for Emission Units Subject to PSD Regulations 82
4-27 Number of S02 Control Alternatives in BACT Decisions
for Emission Units Subject to PSD Regulations 83
4-28 Number of NOx Control Alternatives in BACT Decisions
for Emission Units Subject to PSD Regulations 84
4-29 Number of CO Control Alternatives in BACT Decisions
for Emission Units Subject to PSD Regulations 85
4-30 Number of VOC Control Alternatives in BACT Decisions
for Emission Units Subject to PSD Regulations 86
4-31 Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) Values Associated
with Control Alternatives in BACT Decisions 88
5-1 Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS and Partial
Contributions by Probable Cause of those Reductions
(in Tons/Year) 91
B-l PSD Coding Sheets B-l
B-2 Codes Used in PSD Data Bases B-13
B-3 PSD Unit Classification Codes B-19
C-l Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Particulate Matter
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with All Source
Types in Data Base C-l
C-2 Distribution of NSPS and. Non-NSPS Particulate Matter
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Named PSD
Sources C-2
C-3 Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Particulate Matter
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Other PSD
Sources C_3
Vll
-------
Table
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-ll
C-12
C-13
C-14
C-15
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Sulfur Dioxide
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with All Source
Types in Data Base
Distribution of NSPS and
Emissions -(in Tons/Year)
Sources
Non-NSPS Sulfur
Associated with
Dioxide
Named PSD
Distribution of NSPS and
Emissions (in Tons/Year)
Sources
Non-NSPS Sulfur
Associated with
Dioxide
Other PSD
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with All Source
Types in Data Base
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Named PSD
Sources ...
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Other PSD
Sources
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Carbon Monoxide
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with All Source
Types in Data Base .............. . ...... .
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Carbon Monoxide
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Named PSD
Sources
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Carbon Monoxide
Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Other PSD
Sources ................................ .-
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with All
Source Types in Data Base ...... .- ....................
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-ll
C-12
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Named
PSD Sources ............................ ......
Distribution of NSPS and Non-NSPS Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions (in Tons/Year) Associated with Other
PSD Sources
- ,.
- 1
vm
-------
Table
D-l Mean BACT Emission Rates for Flares/Incinerators at
Chemical Process Plants D-l
D-2 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Thermal Dryers at Coal
Preparation Plants D-2
D-3 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Automobile and Light Duty
Truck Coating Operations D-3
D-4 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Fuel Conversion Plants D-4
D-5 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Incinerators Burning
Solid Waste Which is at Least 50 Percent Municipal D-5
D-6 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Lime Kilns at Kraft Pulp
Mills D-6
D-7 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Recovery Furnaces at
Kraft Pulp Mills D-7
D-8 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Smelt Dissolving Tanks at
Kraft Pulp Mills D-8
D-9 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Kilns at Lime
Manufacturing Plants D-9
D-10 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Sulfur Recovery Plants and
Heaters at Natural Gas Processing Plants D-10
D-ll Mean BACT Emission Rates for Claus Sulfur Recovery
Plants at Petroleum Refineries D-ll
D-12 Mean BACT Emission Rates for FCCU Catalyst Regenerators
at Petroleum Refineries D-12
D-13 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Fuel Gas Combustion
Devices at Petroleum Refineries D-13
D-14 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Kilns and Clinker Coolers
at Portland Cement PI ants ..^ D-14
D-15 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Stationary Gas Turbines D-15
D-16 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Stationary Internal
Combustion Engines 0-16
IX
-------
Table Pa^e
D-17 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Electric Arc Furnaces and
Reheat Furnaces at Steel Plants D-17
D-18 Mean BACT Emission Rates for Various Sources D-18
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
2-1 Chronology of Data Base PSD Application Submittals ....... 7
2-2 Distribution of the Number of Applications Subject to
PSD Regulations with Respect to Permit Reviewer .......... 9
4-1 Chronology of the Fraction of PSD Permits Involving at
Least One Applicable NSPS ................................ 29
4-2 Chronology of the Fraction of the PSD Particulate
Matter Emissions Subject to NSPS ......................... 32
4-3 Chronology of the Fraction of the PSD Sulfur Dioxide
Emissions Subject to NSPS ................................ 33
4-4 Chronology of the Fraction of the PSD Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions Subject to NSPS ................................ 34
4-5 Chronology of the Fraction of the PSD Carbon Monoxide
Emissions Subject to NSPS ................................ 35
4-6 Chronology of the Fraction of the PSD Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions Subject to NSPS ....................... 36
4-7 . A Chronology (by PSD Permit Issuance Date) of BACT and
NSPS Particulate Matter Emission. Rates for Coal -Fired
Industri al Boi 1 ers ....................................... 53
4-8 A Chronology (by PSD Permit Issuance Date) of BACT and
NSPS Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rates for Coal -Fired
Industrial Boilers ....................................... 55
4-9 A Chronology (by PSD Permit Issuance Date) of BACT and
NSPS Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for Coal -Fired
Industrial Boilers ......... .- ............................. 56
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT
E AND NSPS EMISSION RATES
E-l Particulate Matter Emission Rates for
Coal/Wood-Fired Industrial Boilers .................... E-l
E-2 t Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rates for
Coal/Wood-Fired Industrial Boilers .................... E-2
XI
-------
Figure ^S
E-3 Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for
Coal/Wood-Fired Industrial Boilers E-3
E-4 Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Industrial
Boilers/Solid, Liquid, Gas Combination Fuel E-4
E-5 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rates for Industrial
Boilers/Solid, Liquid, Gas Combination Fuel E-5
E-6 0 Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for Industrial
Boilers/Solid, Liquid, Gas Combination Fuel E-6
E-7 Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Coal-Fired
Utility Boilers E-7
E-8 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rates for Coal-Fired
Utility Boilers E-8
E-9 Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for Coal-Fired
Utility Boilers E-9
E-10 Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Thermal
Dryers at Coal Preparation Plants E-10
E-ll Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Lime Kilns
at Kraft Pulp Mills E-ll
E-12 Total Reduced Sulfur Emission Rates for Lime
Kilns at Kraft Pulp Mills E.12
E-13 t Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Recovery
Furnaces at Kraft Pulp Mills E-13
E-14_ Total Reduced Sulfur Emission Rates for Recovery
Furnaces at Kraft Pulp Mills E.14
E-15 Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Smelt
Dissolving Tanks at Kraft Pulp Mills E 15
E-16 t Total Reduced Sulfur Emission Rates for Smelt
Dissolving Tanks at Kraft Pulp Mills r lfi
E-17 Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Kilns at
Lime Manufacturing Plants
E-18 t Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rates for Claus Sulfur
Recovery Units at Petroleum Refineries
t-18
xii
-------
Figure Page
E-19 Particulate Matter Emission Rates for FCCU
Catalyst Regenerators at Petroleum Refineries E-19
E-20 Carbon Monoxide Emission Rates for FCCU
Catalyst Regenerators at Petroleum Refineries E-20
E-21 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rates for Fuel Gas
Combustion Devices at Petroleum Refineries E-21
E-22 t Particulate Matter Emission Rates for Kilns at
Portland Cement Plants E-22
E-23 t Fluoride Emission Rates for Anode Bake Plants at
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants E-23
E-24 t Fluoride Emission Rates for Potroom Groups at
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants E-24
E-25 t Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for Gas-Fired
Stationary Gas Turbines E-25
E-26 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rates for Oil-Fired
Stationary Gas Turbines E-26
E-27 t Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for Oil-Fired
Stationary Gas Turbines E-27
E-28 t Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for Stationary
Internal Combustion Diesel and Dual Fuel Engines E-28
E-29 t Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates for Stationary
Internal Combustion Gas Engines E-29
xm
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In August, 1982, the EPA published a report entitled, "Analysis of New
Source"Review Pe'rmitting Experience" "(the "original NSR report"; NTIS
No. PB 83-115972) wherein data extracted from 285 New Source Review (NSR)
permit files were analyzed and presented. The extracted data were from
Federal pre-construction review permit files established during the period
1977 through early 1981 in all ten EPA regional offices. Although not all
NSR permit files were sampled, the 1981 data base (called the "old" data
base) was considered by the EPA to be somewhat representative of all permits
issued in accordance with EPA's "Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD)" and "Non-attainment Area" regulations as they existed at that time.
Since issuance of the NSR report, two significant changes to these
programs have occurred:
1. On August 7, 1980, revised NSR regulations went into effect as a
result of a Federal Court ruling in the case of Alabama Power vs.
EPA. Among other things, the revised regulations significantly
altered the distribution of source types subject to NSR
requirements.
2. State agencies have been delegated responsibility for the NSR
program from EPA. This means that more state agencies are
directly involved in the program and their involvement is more
extensive.
In mid-1984, EPA again decided to collect and analyze recent-NSR permit
data, partly due to the two program changes mentioned above. Thus, Radian
Corporation was contracted to visit the offices of permit-issuing agencies,
extract relevant data, and format and analyze the new data in the same
general manner as was done for the original NSR study. Thus, this report
summarizes the results of analyzing the more recent permit data and, in a
-------
few cases, makes comparison to the same data in the original NSR study.
Most of the data presented in this report are from the 1984 data base
(called the "new" data base). To indicate what data base was used, each
table and figure is identified in the following manner: DB 79-81 for the
old data base, DB 81-84 for the new data base, and DB 79-84 for both data
"bases.
The main purpose of this update report is to present relevant data in
sufficient detail to allow readers to formulate their own opinions about the
NSR program, especially in comparison to the previous study. Therefore,
readers are advised to read the original NSR report for two main reasons:
1. Appendix A of the original NSR report presented a description of
the NSR regulations and their evolution. Even those familiar with
the NSR program may have difficulty interpreting the data in this
update report and a "refresher" might prove useful.
2. To make value judgements on the effectiveness of the NSR program,
it is necessary to gain some insight into the evolution of the NSR
program. For instance, delegation of the program from EPA to the
States may affect only those parameters that each state
emphasizes. These differences in perspective may become apparent
when comparing similar data in the two reports.
As mentioned previously, this update study was designed to focus on
essentially the same data as in the original NSR report. However,
additional data were collected in this recent effort and the coding schemes
were altered to analyze permit data in greater detail. For instance, codes
were assigned to each emission unit type such that control technology
decision-making (allowable emissions) could be compared on both a regional
and national basis. Furthermore, the data were filed into a statistical
data base (SAS) that allows analyses .to be more efficiently performed. As a
result, much of the data presented" in this report are subdivided by EPA
region and source type, whereas most of the data presented in the original
NSR report were on a national basis.
-------
In Appendix A of this report is a listing of all of the 397 NSR permits
involved in this update study. Also shown are summary data that present
some brief facts about each permit. When combined with the data from the
285 permits involved in the original NSR Study, a data base of 682 permits,
spanning 7 years (1978-1984) is formed. Merging the two data bases provided
the ability to perform some chronologic analyses presented herein such that
the "time-effect" on NSR program elements are readily seen. Of particular
note are the chronologic comparisons of allowable emission rates to existing
and future New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) (Appendix E).
Throughout this report, attempts were made to specify the context of
the ways that emissions data are presented. Because of both the regulatory
aspects of PSD and the manner in which the data were coded, emissions data
are generally described in one of four categories, especially with reference
to aggregate emissions, such as those in the entire data base:
o Emissions associated with PSD Permits. This means those emissions
associated with the construction project for which the PSD
permit(s) was issued, regardless of whether they were subject to
,PSD. Emissions data used in this context can be expressed in
terms of either "gross" or "net" emissions. The difference
between these two terms is the emissions decreases associated with
projects.
o PSD Emissions. This term refers to those emissions associated
with PSD permits that were subject to PSD review. The PSD
regulations provide exemptions from review in certain cases such
as "deminimis" increases, nonattainment area review, etc.
Emissions exempted from PSD review are the difference between
emissions associated with PSD permits and PSD emissions.
Emissions specified in this way may also be presented as "gross"
or "net".
o BACT - Permitted Emissions. This term refers to the emissions
that were subject to BACT review and for which allowable emissions
rates were specified in PSD permits. BACT-permitted emissions may
differ from either of the above mentioned emissions terms for a
number of reasons such as:
-------
emission reductions due to shutdowns, etc., associated with
PSD projects are not considered; and
often, PSD permits specify operating constraints that
prohibit all emission units to be operating at maximum
capacity simultaneously. Thus, the total annual emissions
allowed in a PSD permit may be considerably less than the sum
of all emission units specified in the PSD permit.
o BACT - Permitted Emissions Reductions Beyond NSPS (or simply,
Emissions Reductions Beyond NSPS). This term refers to the
difference in emissions (tons/year) between the permitted
allowable emissions rate and the rate that would have been allowed
if the emissions units were permitted at the maximum allowable
NSPS rate applicable to the emission unit. The maximum allowable
NSPS rate is referred to in the report as "NSPS emissions".
However, PSD emissions (or BACT-permitted emissions) subject to
NSPS means the portion of actually permitted emissions that are
also subject to NSPS.
When reviewing the data presented in this report, the differentiation
in emissions terminology should be kept in mind, especially when trying to
compare two emissions values.
To complicate matters further, often the values reported in the permit
files representing net emissions changes and net emissions decreases did not
exactly add up to the reported gross emissions increases. No attempt was
made to resolve these discrepancies.
-------
2.0 THE NEW DATA BASE
The data and information contained in this report summarizes results of
a study directed at assessing the experience of EPA's New Source Review
(NSR) Program. Information extracted from Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) permit files was compiled, analyzed and interpreted.
Appendix B contains the coding sheets and codes that were used in compiling
the data.
The 1984 data base consists of 397 PSD permit applications that were
issued from 1981 through mid-1984 from the ten EPA regions. Table 2-1
presents the distribution of PSD permit applications by region and by state.
It is interesting to note that 223 of the 397 (56 percent) PSD permits were
issued in Regions IV and VI. A complete listing of all 397 PSD permit
applications is contained in Appendix A.
This section briefly characterizes the data base in terms of the
chronology of PSD application submittals, permit application review
agencies, and emissions associated with PSD applications. PSD applicability,
in terms of source and pollutant applicability, is also discussed.
2.1 DATA BASE CHARACTERIZATION
2.1.1 Chronology of PSD Application Submittals
Figure 2-1 presents a chronology of PSD application submittals by the
month the application was submitted. The earliest application in the 1984
data base was submitted in December of 1977. The latest application was
submitted in July of 1984. Two "surges" in the number of applications
occurred in May of 1980 and June of 1981. It appears that these "surges"
occurred at times of actual or anticipated changes in PSD requirements. In
June of 1980, the Alabama Power "stay" was due to expire, and in June of
1981 new ambient monitoring requirements were put into effect.
-------
TABLE 2-1.
DISTRIBUTION OF PSD PERMIT APPLICATIONS
BY REGION AND BY STATE
Region/State
REGION I
Connecticut
Maine
MaJSKhu sett!
Vermont
REGION II
Nee Jersey
Me* York
Puerto R1co
Virgin Islands
REGION III
Maryland
Pennsylvania
VlrglnU
West Virginia
REGION IV
Alabeaa
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
REGION V
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Hlsconsln
REGION VI
Arizona
Louisiana
Hew Mexico
OklahoM
Texai
REGION VII
Io»«
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
REGION VIII
Colorado
Montana
Utah
REGION IX
Arizona
California
Havall
Nevada
Pago
REGION X
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
NATIONAL TOTAL
NMfcor of PSD
Perm Applications
24
1
13
3
7
22
S
12
1
4
12
1
7
1
3
107
9
22
19
5
9
15
7
21
5S
14
4
15
S
12
3
116
6
24
1
10
75
14
6
6
1
1
10
5
2
3
17
1
13
1
1
1
19
5
1
2
11
397
DB 81-84
-------
35-
30
Total Sources =390
New Major Sources = 108
Major Modifications =282
1980 I 1981
Data Submitted
New Major Sources
Major Modifications
Total Sources
1984
Figure 2-1
Chronology of Data Base PSD Application Submlttals (by month submitted)
DB 81-84
-------
2.1.2 Permit Application Review Agencies
All data base applications were categorized as having been reviewed by
state agencies, EPA, contractors, local agencies, or combinations thereof.
Figure 2-2 presents the distribution of PSD permit applications by
reviewer. Permit reviewer categories 4 and Syndicate review by the Federal
Land Manager with either EPA or the State agency. This means that the
permit files showed evidence of the Federal Land Manager involvement in the
review of the permit application. In 59 percent of the PSD applications,
reviews were conducted by state agencies. EPA and contractors reviewed
21 percent and 12 percent of the applications, respectively. In the 1981
data base, only 12 percent of the applications were reviewed by state
agencies, while 69 percent and 19 percent were reviewed by EPA and
contractors, respectively. This shift in review responsibility from EPA to
the states was a direct result of the fact that, since the original study,
many state agencies have been delegated responsibility for the NSR program
from EPA.
2.1.3 Emissions Associated with PSD Applications
Fifteen pollutants were associated with PSD applications in the 1984
data base - six criteria pollutants and nine non-criteria pollutants. Most
of the analyses in this report deal with five criteria pollutants:
particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (S02), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon
monoxide (CO), and volatile organic compounds (VOC). For completeness, a
non-criteria pollutant emission summary (lead is included here) is presented
in Table 2-2. In addition to lead, these pollutants include: asbestos,
beryllium, fluorides, hydrogen sulfide, lead, mercury, reduced sulfur,
sulfuric acid mist, total reduced sulfur and vinyl chloride.
8
-------
Figure 2-2
Distribution of the Number of Applications Subject to
PSD Regulations with Respect to Permit Reviewer
240-
220-
CO 200-
Z
<0 O
ZZ 180-
o <
H -J
<3 16O-
*i*
o o
IU
0. tt 140-
O. Q
U.O. 120-
00
S|I 100-
Z ni
3-3 80-
Z CO
<° 60-
40-
20-
n-
236
83
-
1 - EPA
2 - State
3 - Contractor
4 - EPA/Federal Land Manager
5 - State/Federal Land Manager
or EPA
6 - Contractor/Federal Land Manager
or EPA
7 - County
46
13 14
1 1
-60
-50
-40
h-30
-20
-10
-n
DO a
c_ n
m m
o z
2 °
O -n
o >
w r-
m 2
o ]2
c -
r o
z z
(O CO
345
PERMIT REVIEWER
6
DB 81-84
-------
DATA BASE EMISSION SUMMARY FOR NON-CRITERIA
POLLUTANTS AND LEAD
Nationwide Emissions
Pollutant (Tons/Year)
Asbestos 13-2
Beryllium °-338
Fluorides 517-5
Hydrogen Sulfide 800-3
Lead 88.7
Mercury 7.6
Reduced Sulfur 42.0
Sulfuric Acid Mist 7897.7
Total Reduced Sulfur 6514.5
Vinyl Chloride 74.0
Table 2-2 presents an emission summary of PM, SOp, NO , CO, and VOC
emissions (both gross emissions and net emission changes) in the 1984 data
base by EPA region. These emissions include all those associated with PSD
applications, whether or not they were subject to PSD regulations. This
table shows that S02 has the highest net emission total of any pollutant in
the data base with about 782,500 tons per year.
~A comparison of criteria major pollutant (except lead) emission
increases (gross emissions) subject to PSD regulations for utility sources
and all sources associated with the original and updated PSD data bases is
presented in Table 2-3. In the 1984 data base, total emission increases
were higher for all these pollutants, while utility emission increases were
lower. Thus, utility emissions represent a significantly smaller proportion
of the 1984 data base.
10
-------
TABLE 2-2. DATA BASE EMISSION SUMMARY: TOTAL EMISSION INCREASES AMD NET EMISSION CHANGES BY EPA REGION
Total Emissions Associated with PSD Permit Applications (Tons/Year)*
EPA Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Total
Gross
Emissions
2,290
8,241
2,808
25,065
6,170
27,055
1,200
1,857
1,362
7,173
83,220
PM
Net Emission
Changes
1,743
7,400
1,367
22,264
5,140
24,658
1,200
1,745
253
2,031
68.574
S0?
Gross
Emissions
14,855
46,658
22.888
30li721
89,619
402,610
18,344
2,572
5,434
35,819
940,519
Net Emission
Changes
5,039
40,782
22,348
202,700
78,810
391,641
12,358
2,504
732
24,313
782,516
NO
X
Gross
Emissions
8,582
42,970
23,754
167,149
61,509
311,935
22,429
10,713
9,519
113,364
771,923
Net Emission
Changes
7,315
40,296
23,754
157,623
57,314
305,900
22,409
8,297
5,558
67,489
740,200
Gross
Emissions
16,709
4,562
2,883
132,126
20,093
64,255
3,188
1,034
5,230
39,050
289.129
CO
Net Emission
Changes
16,458
4,294
2,883
123,254
17,874
-55,222
3,187
739
2,319
12,440
137,874
VOC
Gross
Emissions
823
8,047
395
18,654
4,530
5,859
1.489
2,296
5,119
3,804
51,015
Net Emission
Changes
688
7,874
-1,073
17,777
645
-228
1,362
2,184
-344
2,187
31,072
These emissions Include those that were subject to PSD regulations, as well as those that were not subject to PSD regulations.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 2-3. COMPARISON OF TOTAL AND UTILITY PSD EMISSIONS INCREASES FOR THE ORIGINAL AND UPDATED PSD DATA BASES
Pollutant
Participate matter
Sulfur dioxide
Nitrogen oxides
Carbon monoxide
Volatile organic
compounds
Original
Total PSD
Emission Increases
(tons/year)
54,200
761,800,
712,400
159,100
13,700
Data Base (1981 Data
Utility PSD
Emission Increases
(tons/ year)
31.400
569,400
550,000
61,500
4,500
Base)
Percent Utility
Emissions
57.9
74.7
77.2
38.7
32.8
Undated
Total PSD
Emission Increases
(tons/ year)
67,200
814,400
741,600
249,282
29,200
Data Base (1984 Data
Utility PSD
Emission Increases
(tons/ year)
25,800
441,100
391,400
47,900
600
Base)
Percent Utility
Emissions
38.4
54.2
52.8
19.2
2.1
DB 79-84
-------
2.2 PSD APPLICABILITY
2.2.1 Source Applicability
PSD regulations can apply to new grassroot facilities, as well as
modifications to existing major sources. In fact, of the 397 permits in the
new data base, 108 were new source constructions. Major modifications were
classified in 7 different ways, as shown in Table 2-5. These modifications
were: combustion unit additions, process unit additions, process changes,
fuel switches, or combinations of the above.
A summary of the distribution of PSD permit applications by industrial
source type within each EPA region is presented in Table 2-4. The data base
applications are grouped into "named" PSD sources and "other" PSD sources.
EPA has "named" 28 source categories under the PSD regulations. The 1984
data base contained 21 of the 28 "named" sources, representing 54 percent of
the data base applications. Generally, "named" sources are subject to a
100 ton/year major source emission threshold as defined in the PSD
regulations. The "other" PSD source types are major only if they emit more
than 250 tons/year of any regulated pollutant.
Source types with the most national representation in the data base
were chemical process plants (46, 11.6 percent); electric plants (46,
11.6 percent); natural gas processing plants (35, 8.8 percent); petroleum
refineries (34, 8.6 percent); natural gas and crude oil pumping stations
(33, 8.3 percent); kraft pulp mills (32, 8.1 percent); food processing
plants (29, 7.3 percent); and lumber and wood products plants (17,
4.3 percent).
2.2.2 Pollutant Applicability
Currently, six criteria pollutants and all non-criteria pollutants are
covered by PSD regulations. Reviews must be conducted for subject
pollutants when emission levels exceed certain thresholds. For the criteria
pollutants (except lead) these thresholds are: 25 tons/year for PM,
40 tons/year for S02, 40 tons/year for NOX, 100 tons/year for CO, and
13
-------
TABLE 2-4. DISTRIBUTION OF PSD PERMIT APPLICATIONS BY SOURCE TYPE WITHIN EACH REGION
Region Region
Source Type I II
Electric Plants 4.2% (1) 4.5* (1)
(Utilities)
>250 1* Btu/hr
Coal Cleaning Plants
Kraft Pulp Hills 16.7* (4)
Portland Cement Plants
Iron and Steel Mills 4.2* (1) 4.5* (1)
Primary Aluminum Ore 4.5* (1)
Plants
Primary Copper Smelters
Municipal Incinerators 4.5* (1)
>250 tons/day
Sulfurlc Add Plants
Nitric Acid Plants
Petroleum Refineries 13.5* (3)
L1me Plants ,
Phosphate Rock
Processing Plants
Coke Oven Batteries
Sulfur Recovery Plants
Carbon Black Plants
Fuel Conversion Plants
Secondary Metal
Production Plants
Chemical Process Plants 8.3* (2) 32. Of (7)
Fossil Fuel Boilers
>250 MM Btu/hr
Petroleum Storage and
Transfer >300.000 BBL
SUBTOTAL FOR NAMED PSD 33.4* (8) 63.5* (14)
SOURCE CATEGORIES1
Percentage (Number of
Region Region
III IV
8.3* (1) 3,7* <4)
8.3* (1)
12.1* (13)
1.9* (2)
0.9* (1)
1.9* (2)
8.3* (1) 1.9* (2)
1.9* (2)
0.9* (1)
0.9* (1)
8.3* (1)
4.7* (5)
8.3* (1)
2.8* (3)
0.9* (1)
8.3* (1) 9.3* (10)
0.9* (1)
49.8* (6) 44.7* (48)
Permit Application?) Summnd Vertically
Region Region Region Region
V VI VII VIII
10.7* (6) 14.7* (17) 7.1* (1)
1.7* (2)
8.9* (5) 6.0* (7)
0.9* (1)
1.8* (1)
1.8* (1)
0.9* (1)
7.1* (4) 18.1* (21) 7.1* (1) 20.0* (2)
2.6* (3) 10.0* (1)
0.9* (1)
0.9* (1)
3.4* (4)
3.6* (2) 30.0* (3)
1.8* (1) 2.6* (3)
16. 1* (9) 11.2* (13) 28.6* (4)
5.4* (3)
57.2* (32) 63.9* (74) 42.8* (6) 60.0* (6)
Region Region National
IX X Totals
11.8* (2) 21.1* Ml 9.3* (37)
0.8* (3)
11.8* (2) 5.3* (1) 8.1* (32)
11.8* (2) 5.3* (1) l.B* (6)
1.0* (4)
10.5* (2) 1.3* (5)
0.3* (1)
5.3* (1) 1.3* (5)
0.6* (3)
0.3* (1)
11.8* (2) 8.6* (34)
1.3* (5)
1.3* (5)
0.5* (21
0.5* (1)
1.0* U>
2.0* (8)
1.3* (5)
11.6* (46)
21.1* (4) 1.8* (7)
0.3* (1)
47.2* (8) 68.6* (13) 54.2* (215)
Not all of the 28 named PSO source categories »ere 1n the data base.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 2-4. DISTRIBUTION OF PSD PEWIT APPLICATIONS BY SOURCE Jiff. WITHIN EACH REGION (Continued)
.Percentage (Hmcer of Per.lt Applications) Suimed Vertically
Region Region Region Region Region Region Region Region Region Region National
Source Type I n jj] jy y yl ylj ynl Jx x Totals
Mining (other than l.gj
Plants
Rubber and Plastic 1.8* (1) 0.9* (1) 0.5* (2)
Production Plants
Textile Manufacturing 3.7* (4) 1.0* (4)
Plants
Limber and Wood 20.61(5) 6.5* (7) 3.6* (2) 1.7* (2) 5.3* (I) 4.3* (17)
Products Plants
Agricultural Chealcsl 0.9* (1) 0.3* (1)
Production Plants
Natural Gas Processing i 5.6* (6) 3.6* (2) 20.7* (24) 20.0* (2) 5.3* (1) 8.8* (35)
Plants
Solid Waste 16.7* (4) 11.8* (2) 1.5* (6)
Reel tut ton Plants
Graphite Electrode 4.5* (1) 8.3* (1) 0.9*
-------
TABLE 2-5. DISTRIBUTION OF PSD PERMIT APPLICATIONS
BY PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE
Project Descriptions
Number of
Applications
Percent
of Total
Applications
New source construction
Modification of an existing source:
combustion emission unit added
Modification of an existing source:
process emission unit added
Modification of an existing source:
fuel switch at existing emission unit
Modification of an existing source:
process and combustion emission units
added
Modification of an existing source:
process and combustion emission units
added, and fuel switch at existing
emission unit
Modification at an existing source:
combustion emission unit added and
fuel switch at existing emission unit
Modification at an existing source:
process change at an existing emission
unit
Unknown
Total
108
153
34
19
68
277,
39?
953
5%
11%
0.3%
0.355
10 OS
DB 81-84
16
-------
40 tons/year for VOC. The 1984 data base had a total of 941 pollutant
reviews, for a nationwide average of 2.4 pollutant reviews per application.
The distribution of the number of pollutants reviewed per application was as
follows:
% of appl
reviewed
PSD regul
ications
under
ations
Number
1
33%
of Pol
2
22%
lutants
3
20%
Reviewed
4
17%
Per
5
8%
Application
6
0%
Table 2-6 presents the distribution of the number of PSD pollutant
reviews by criteria (except lead) pollutant (PM, SCL, NO. CO, VOC) and by
£ J\
region. As can be seen, nitrogen oxides were responsible for 31.3 percent
of the reviews, while S02 and PM were responsible for 26.7 percent and
18.3 percent, respectively. With respect to the regional distribution of
pollutant reviews, 57 percent were conducted in Regions IV and VI.
The distribution of net allowable emissions subject to NSR/PSD
permitting by criteria pollutants (except lead), by source type and by EPA
region is presented in Tables 2-7 thru 2-11. Emissions associated with
"named" PSD sources ranged from 70.3 to 87.4 percent of total national
emissions. As can be seen, over 50 percent of the S02 and NOX emissions are
contributed by electric utilities, and over 40 percent of the VOC emissions
are contributed by petroleum refineries.
17
-------
Table 2-6. DISTRIBUTION OF THE NUMBER OF PSD POLLUTANT
REVIEWS BY POLLUTANT AND BY REGION
EPA Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National Total
% of National
Total
PM
14
10
4
72
16
37
4
4
3
10
174
18.3%
so2
17
15
8
74
36
66
10
5
10
13
254
26.7%
N0x
12
18
10
76
46
86
14
7
12
17
298
31.3%
CO
7
10
4
39
18
50
6
4
8
12
158
16.6%
VOC
0
3
1
29
2
13
6
3
1
9
67
7.0%
Total
50
56
27
290
118
252
40
23
34
61
951
100%
DB 81-84
18
-------
TABLE 2-7. DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS SUBJEa TO NSR/PSD PERMITTING BETWEEN 1981 AMD 1985
(BY EPA REGION, BY SOURCE TYPE)
Region
Source Type I
El«ctr1c Plants (Utilities)
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Coal Cleaning Plants
Kraft Pulp Mills 286
Portland Ceewt Plants
I TOO WHl Steel Mllli
Prlsary AluMlnim Or* Plants
Municipal Incinerators
>2SO tons/day
Sulfurlc Acid Plants
Petroleui Refineries
Llee Plants
Pnosphate Rock Processing Plants
Coke Own Battarlss
Fuel Conversion Plants
Secondary Matal Production
Plants
Chealcal Procsss Plants
Fossil Fool Bollsrs
>2SO MM Btu/hr
SUBTOTAL FOR NAMED PSD SOURCE 286
CATEGORIES*
Mining (other than Coal, Iron)
Natural Gas and Cnid* Oil
Pueptng Stations
Fossil Fi»l Sollors 34
<250 MM Btu/hr
Elsctrlc Plants <2SO MM Btu/hr
Asphalt Production Plants 15
Textile Manufacturing Plants
Lueber and Vood Products Plants 4«7
Natural Gas Procssslng Plants
Solid Kasts Recloutlon 673
Graphlt* Electrode Plants
Automotive Part Manufacturing
Plants
Kaolin Processing Plants
Food Processing Plants 141
Printing Plants
Computer Manufacturing Plants
Appliance Coating Plants
REGIONAL TOTALS 1.638
% OF NATIONAL TOTAL 2.4
N.t Allmbla
Region Region Region
II III I*
953 874 3.558
'7.252
529
107
404 555
208 68
5,353. 480
193
154
3,063
_ _ ,26
198 1.246
7.114 1,028 17,177
311
75
1S7
87 142
100
212
736
64
- 280
208
525
140 219 1,074
532
-56
7,321 1.247 21.649
10.9 2.0 32.2
felsitani (Toni/Yair) of PM
Region Region Region Region
V VI VII VIII
2,168 16.839 1.015
660
1.275 " 1,481 "
537
120
_ _ _ _
1,792
181 786 1,224
149
_ _ _ _
193
463
167
91 209 92
129
3.964 22.813 1,107 1,687
__ ___
102 71
_ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
579
_ _ _ _
_ _ _
125
87 58
_ _ _ _
87 _
4,240 23,587 1,165 1,687
6.3 3S.1 1.7 2.5
National
Region Region Tons/
IX X Year
ISO 179 25.736
660
22 ~ 10.316
-110 279 1,235
227
959
274
1,792
8.024
149
193
347
3,526
293
1,836
3,001 3,130
62 3,459 58,697
311
547 622
53 417
209
115
212
1,802
422 486
673
280
208
650
91 1,810
532
56
87
62 4,572 67.167
0.1 6.7
Tatlll
X Of
Total
38.3
1.0
15.4
1.8
0.3
1.4
0.4
2.7
11.9
0.2
0.3
0.5
S.2
0.4
2.7
.7
87.4
0.5
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.3
2.7
0.7
1.0
0.4
0.3
1.0
2.7
0.8
0.1
0.1
100
Not ill of tlw 28 n«Md PSD sou re* cat*gor1«* ««r« In th« d«t4 baM*
DB 81-84
19
-------
TABLE 2-8. DISTRIBUTION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSR/PSD PEWITTING BETWEEN igm lin lo.c
(BY EPA REGION, BY SOURCE TYPE) «'«*« 1901 AM) 1985
Region
Source Type I
Electric Plant! (Ut1l1t1«) 98
>250 MM Btu/hr
Coal Cleaning Plant!
Kraft Pulp M11U 274
Portland Cement Plant!
Iron and Steel Mill!
PHeary Aluminum Ore Plant!
Municipal Incinerator*
>250 tan*/day
SulfuMe Acid Plant*
Petroleu*) Reflnerle!
Lie* Plant!
Pno*phate Rock Procentng
Plant*
Coke Oven BetteHe*
Sulfur Recovery Plant*
Carton Black Plant*
Fuel Conversion Plant!
Chemical Proee** Plant*
Fo*>11 Fuel Boiler*
>250 MM Btu/hr
SUBTOTAL FOR NAMED PSD SOURCE 372
CATEGORIES*
Mining (other than Coal, Iron)
Natural Sa> and Crude Oil
Pumping Station*
Fo**1l Fuel Boiler* <250 MM Btu/hr 821
Electric Plant* <250 MM Btu/hr
Aipnalt Production Plant* 5
Rubber and Plaitlc Production
Plant*
Textile Manufacturing Plant*
Lumber and Wood Product* Plants 873
Agricultural Chemical
Production Plant*
Natural Gas Proc***1ng Plant*
Solid Wast* Reclamation Plants 1,618
Graphite Electrode Plants
Automotive Part
Manufacturing Plant*
Kaolin Proceulng Plant*
Food Praceulng Plant* 1.380
Printing Plant*
BreveMo*
Computer Manufacturing Plant*
Glai* Manufacturing Plant*
Appliance Coating Plant*
REGIONAL TOTALS 5.268
% OF RATIONAL TOTAL 0.6
Not all of the 28 nemed PSD source categor
N«t «llm,.b
Region Region Region
11 III IV
11.975 16,500 82,180
528
44,842
18
404
4.224 4.536
657 1.259 955
1.981
19.743 7,875
101
2,611
706
16,676
3,628 96 14.271
. _ __
40.227 19.190 176.349
273
8.241
2.397
442 3.864
_ _
1.972
5,796
951
2.377
1.311
3.762
1.061
3.157 10,710
8,007-
» _
122 508
« __
__
40.791 22.347 225.579
5.0 2.7 27.7
le_EeJilil
Region
41.460
10.433
9
_
3.432
_
1.166
4.684
2,424
63.608
_
1.975
1.682
__
383
IM_
2.883
5.458
___
...
.
1.670
3.462
81.121
10.0
,n. ITam/Y..rl nf
-------
TABLE 2-9. DISTRIBUTION OF NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSR/PSO PERMITTING BETWEEN 1981 AMD 1985
(BY EPA REGION, BY SOURCE TYPE)
Source Type
Electric Plinti (UtimiM)
>250 MM Btu/hr
Coal Cleaning Plant!
Kraft Pulp Mllll
Portland CeaMflt Plants -
Iran and Steel Mllli
PrlMry Alinlnim Ore Plants
Municipal Incinerators
>2SO tons/day
SulfuMc Acid Plants
Nitric Acid Plants
Petroleum Refineries
L1M Plants
Phosphate Rock Processing
Plants
Cok* Ov«ci Batteries
Carbon Black Plants
Fuel Conversion Plants
Secondary Metal Production
Plants
Chesrical Process Plants
Fossil Fuel Sellers
>250 MM Btu/hr
SUBTOTAL FOR NAMED PSO SOURCE
CATEGORIES*
Mining (other than Coal. Iron)
Natural Sas and Crude Oil
Pushing stations
Fossil Fuel Boilers
<2SO MM Btu/hr
Electric Plants <250 MM Btu/hr
Rubber and Plastic Production
Plants
Textile Manufacturing Plants
Luster and Wood Products
Plants
Natural Gas Processing Plants
Solid Waste Reclamation Plants
Graphite Electrode Plants
Automotive Part
Manufacturing Plants
Kaolin Processing Plants
Food Processing Plants
Printing Plants
Breverlos
Costw-tor Manufacturing Plants
Appliance Coating Plants
REGIONAL TOTALS
I Of NATIONAL TOTAL
Region Region Region Region
I II III IV
239 17.765 18.500 70,558
_ _ _ _
3.175 23,011
- _ - - _ -1.337
2.742 44
985 1.001 1.454
192
8,007 2.851
135
1,475
3,440
19,640
227
8.511 48 8,689
_ _ _
3.414 38.010 21.124 129. 577
142
79 550 950 2.223
190 659
1.824 5.339
__ ... ...
1,252
67 4,524
3,301
2,857
167
743
- 293
536 1.489 5.141
3.830
126 112
7,143 40.510 23.563 157.303
1.0 5.5 3.2 21.2
Region
V
34,279
6.230
572
1.940
-
430
_
3.445
1,190
48.086
_
720
290
278
1,360
732
1.798
2.618
1,301
57,183
7.7
Region Region Region
VI VII VIII
225.932 14,760
2.920
9,992
_
_
35,840
7.428 200 7,691
958
_ , .
423
59
1,836
197
7,096 1,697
_ « _
291,719 16,657 9.527
_; _
7,611 1,149 239
462
2,220
175
1,771
4,004 149
_ _ _
199
_ ...
_ _ _
2.383
_ _ _
345
_ _
306.286 22,409 9.915
41.3 3.0 1.3
National
Region Region Tons/
IX X Year
2.392 9,014 391,439
2,920
745 552 43,705
796 1*314 4*321
671
2,786
1,050 4,490
35.840
192
1,143 29.260
1,093
1,475
3,863
59
21.906
424
29,486
57,735 58.925
5,076 69,665 632,855
142
82 22,427 36.030
482 2,083
274 9,657
453
1,252
353 8,075
17.912 26.098
2.857
366
2.541
85 378
876 13,043
3,830
345
23 161
1.301
5,540 111.715 741,567
0.74 15.1
Total j
I of
Total
52.8
0.4
5.9
0 6 *'
0.1
0.4
0.6
4.8
0.03
3.9
0.14
0.2
0.5
0.01
3.0
0.1
4.0
7.9
85.3
0.02
4.9
0.3
1.3
0.1
0.2
1.1
3.5
0.4
0.04
0.3
0.05
1.8
0.5
0.04
0.02
0.2
100
Not all of the 28 naawd PSO source categories >ere In the data base.
DB 81-84
21
-------
TABLE 2-10. DISTRIBUTION OF CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSR/PSO PERMITTING BETWEEN 1991 AND 1985
(BY EPA REGION. BY SOURCE TYPE)
Region
Source Type 1
Electric Plants (Utilities)
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Coal Cleaning Plants
Kraft Pulp Mills 2,200
Portland Cement Plants
Iran and Steel Mills 208
Primary Aluminum Ore Plants
Primary Copper Smelters
Municipal Incinerators
>250 tons/day
Sulfurlc Acid Plants
Petroleum Refineries
Lime Plants
Phosphate Rock Processing
Plants
Fuel Conversion Plants
Secondary Metal Production
Plants
Chemical Process Plants
>250 MM Btu/hr
SUBTOTAL FOR NAMED PSO SOURCE 2,406
CATEGORIES*
Natural Gas and Crude Oil
Pumping Stations
Fossil Fuel Boilers
<2SO MM Btu/hr
Electric Plants <250 MM Btu/hr
Lumber and »ood Products
Plants
Natural Gas Processing Plants
Solid lasts Reclamation 12,945
Plants
Graphite Electrode Plants
Food Processing Plants
Printing Plants
Appliance Coating Plants
REGIONAL TOTALS 15.351
< OF NATIONAL TOTAL 6.2
*Not all of the 28 nemed PSD source categoric
Hmt AllOMb
Region Region Region
11 III -IV "
1.247 1,100 5,669
21,69*
_ _ _
81 213
112 19,717
203 406 168
1,204 997
90
24.677
24.007
w
308 2.147
3.155 1.596 99,292
~ "" ~~~ 195
657
832
712
809
- -
635 1,066 18.933
330 565
210
_
4.120 2.662 122.205
1.7 1.1 49.0
s vere In the data base.
le Ee1««1o
Region
V
3.190
10.177
540
1.695
_
716
__
725
__
741
17,784
228
128
___
__
219
140
18,500
7.4
ni (Tons/Year) of CO
Region Region
VI VII
33,430 1.750
270
3.056
_ _
_ __
5,694
3,641
638
__ _
341
7.512 200
54,582 1.950
1.988 330
' 720
1.901
1. 175 _
Z
59,645 3,000
3.9 1.2
-
Nation
Region Region Region Tons/
__.uf y .- fy -y ₯»
Tin IA A Tear
255 1,290 47,931
270
635 1.398 39.165
348 348
1.040
3.297 23.126
1.695
775
5.694
83 220 6,861
728
24.677
191 24,923
! 341
10,908
274 1,458 11,735 194.232
144 SSI 4,270 7.716
194 851
l4* 1,696
470 3,211
*~ *~ 4,439 6,423
12.945
20,634
110 1,224
210
140
«» 2,162 21,218 249.282
°'2 0.9 8.5
'
1 Total]
* of
Totil
19.2
0.1
15.7
0.1
0.4
9.3
0.7
0.3
2.3
2.8
0.3
9.9
10.0
0.1
4.4
2.3
77.9
3.1
0.3
0.7
1.3
2.6
5.2
8.3
0.5
0.1
0.06
100
DB 81-84
22
-------
TABLE 2-11. DISTRIBUTION Of VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND ENISSIONS SUBJECT TO HSR/PSO PEWITTIN6 BET»EEN 1981 AW 1985
(BY EPA REGION, BY SOURCE TYPE)
Region
Source Type I
Electric Plants (Utilities)
>250 NM Btu/hr
Kraft Pulp mils
PetroleuB Refineries _
Phosphate Rock Processing
Plants
Fuel Conversion Plants
Secondary Metal Production
Plants
Chearical Process Plants
Fossil Fuel Boilers
>250 MM Bt«/hr
Petroleuai Storage and
Transfer Units >300,000 Barrels
SUBTOTAL FOR NAMED PSD SOURCE 0
CATEGORIES'
Natural Gas and Crude Oil
Pimping Stations
Fossil Fuel Boilers
<2SO MM Btu/hr
Electric Plants <250 MM Btti/hr
Textile Manufacturing Plants
Lueter and food Products
Plants
Natural Gas Processing Plants
Graphite Electrode Plants
Food Processing Plants _
Printing Plants
Appliance Coating Plants _
REGIONAL TOTALS 0
1 OF NATIONAL TOTAL 0.0
Not all of the 28 naawd PSD source categories
DB 81-84
Region Region Region
II III IV
275 82
7,488 1,992
99
1,112
1,208
184 1,210
233
7,672 275 7,895
_ _ _
378
112
1.956
127
411
665
989
7.672 275 12.533
26.3 0.9 43.0
ere 1n the data base.
EBlsiloni (Tnna/Year) of VOC National
Region Region Region Region Region Region Tons/
V VI VII VIII IX X Year
89 130 576
220 127 49 2,355
602 78 1,998 12.158
______ 99
1.112
404 449 2,061
115 1,509
400 400
233
404 1,360 323 1,998 127 449 20,503
459 195 51 705
87 87
378
______ U2
43 160 2,159
158 1,201 1,359
__ IZ7
1,037 50 1,498
587 1,252
989
991 2.020 1,360 2.193 127 1.998 29.169
3.4 6.9 4.7 7.5 0.4 6.8
Totals
* of
Total
2.0
8.1
41.7
0.3
3.8
7.1
5.2
1.4
0.8
70.3
2.4
0.3
1.3
0.4
7.4
4.7
0.4
5.1
4.3
3.4
100
23
-------
3.0 PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING TIMES
The necessary time to obtain a PSD permit involves both the time for
1 ndustry~to develop"a "complete"~appli ca'tiori~arid the~timei~for~the rev iewirig
authority to process it. There are four distinct stages of the permitting
process:
1. Application preparation and submittal;
2. Agency review for "completeness";
3. Preliminary determination, draft permit preparation and public
comment period; and
4. Final permit issuance.
The time to process a PSD application through the latter three stages forms
the basis for the analysis of this section.
3.1 TOTAL PROCESSING TIME
PSD permit processing times varied widely among data base applications.
As shown in Table 3-1, the time between initial applications submittal and
permit issuance ranged from 1.2 to 57.6 months. The mean processing time
for all permits was 10.5 months. Permits involving NSPS facilities took
longer to process than those not involving NSPS - 12.6 months versus
8.9 months. This is probably due to the fact that NSPS's generally apply to
utilities and other large sources. PSD applications from large sources
typically take longer to process than permits involving small emission
increases.
3.2 APPLICATION COMPLETENESS
When a PSD permit is determined "complete," the review authority
usually has all the information necessary to make a permitting decision A
shown in Table 3-2, the time between date of "completenps*" anH f -,
r '-ciiebi ana final permit
24
-------
TABLE 3-1. SUMMARY OF PSD PERMIT PROCESSING TIME (INITIAL APPLICATION SUBMITTAL TO PERMIT ISSUANCE) BY EPA REGION
Permits Involving NSPS
Number of
Applications
EPA Region Reviewed
i
I
II
III
IV
ro v
en
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Nationwide
10
16
4
43
15
49
4
4
9
16
170
Facilities
Mean Range of
Processing Processing
Time (Months) Time (Months)
9.8
19.8
19.2
11.3
9.8
12.3
14.3
14.5
15.2
9.9
12.6
1.2-19.5
4.7-57.6
2.2-44.5
2.5-45.3
2.8-41.2
2.0-46.1
5.4-29.6
6.3-35.1
5.9-37.1
4.3-19.9
1.2-57.6
Permits Not Involving NSPS Facilities
Number of
Appl Icatlons
Reviewed
14
6
8
64
41
67
10
6
8
3
227
Mean Range of
Processing Processing
Time (Months) Time (Months)
8.8
14.4
10.9
6.7
10.4
9.4
9.6
7.8
10.3
7.0
8.9
3.0-16.2
9.1-22.3
3.3-17.4
1.2-24.7
1.6-41.1
1.7-27.1
4.0-17.7
4.2-11.7
3.2-28.7
5.6- 8.5
1.2-41.1
Total Permits Issued
Number of
Applications
Reviewed
24
22
12
107
56
116
14
10
17
19
397
Mean
Processing
Time (Months)
9.2
18.3
13.7
8.6
10.3
10.6
11.0
9.9
13.1
9.4
10.5
Range of
Processing
Time (Months)
1.2-19.5
4.7-57.6
2.2-44.5
1.2-45.3
1.6-41.2
1.7-46.1
4.0-29.6
2.5-35.1
3.2-37.1
4.3-19.9
1.2-57.6
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 3-2. SUMMARY OF PSD PERMIT PROCESSING TIME (SUBMITTAL OF A COMPLETE APPLICATION TO PERMIT ISSUANCE) BY EPA REGION
EPA Region
I
II
III
IV
IN)
CD V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Nat ton wide
Permits
Number of
Appl (cations
Reviewed
10
16
4
43
15
49
4
4
9
16
170
Involving NSPS
Mean
Processing
Time (Months)
5.8
7.0
7.6
7.5
4.3
10.2
9.2
4.1
6.3
6.8
7.8
Facilities
Range of
Processing
Time (Months)
1.2-18.1
3.4-12.8
1.7-13.6
1.0-45.3
2.5- 7.0
2.8-34.6
5.6-12.9
, 3.2- 5.0
3.8- 9.6
3.0-13.3
1.0-45.3
Permits Not
Number of
Appl Icatlons
Reviewed
14
6
8
64
41
67
10
6
8
3
227
Involving NSPS
Mean
Processing
Time (Months)
2.8
7.9
8.1
5,3
5.2
8.0
11.1
6.7
5.3
6.2
6.3
Facilities
Range of
Processing
Time (Months)
0.2- 9.0
1.8-13.1
3.6-11.9
1.2-15.2
1.2-20.2
1.7-26.6
3.3-17.7
4.5- 8.8
0.7-10.3
4.9- 7.8
0.2-26.6
Total Permits Issued
Number of
Applications
Reviewed
24
22
12
107
56
116
,14
10
17
19
397
Mean
Processing
Time (Months)
4.0
7.3
8.0
6.2
5.0
8.9
10.7
5.1
5.8
6.7
6.9
Rang© of
Processing
Time (Months)
0.2-18.1
1.8-13.1
1.7-13.6
1.0-45.3
1.2-20.2
1.7-34.6
3.3-17.7
3.2- 8.8
0.7-10.3
3.0-13.3
0.2-45.3
DB 81-84
-------
issuance ranged from 0.2 to 45.5 months, with a mean of 6.9 months. Once
again, permits involving NSPS facilities took longer to process than those
not involving NSPS--7.8 months versus 6.3 months.
27
-------
4.0 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACT)
DECISIONS AND EMISSION LIMITATIONS
This section presents compilations of BACT decisions, technology
alternatives analyzed, associated allowable emissions rates and the
relationships to applicable New Source Performance Standard (NSPS).
The allowable emission rates prescribed by applicable NSPS's provide a
uniform baseline against which to measure degrees of stringency in BACT
decision making. Furthermore, approximately half of all PSD permits in both
the old and new data bases involved at least one applicable NSPS. Figure
4-1 shows a chronology of the fraction of PSD permits that involved at least
one applicable NSPS for any pollutant. The points on this figure represent
the ratio of permits involving NSPS to total permits issued in the indicated
calendar 3-month period. Except for one period, this ratio has been within
the range of .35 to .6 since March, 1979.
On a facility-by-facility basis however, NSPS plays a much lesser role.
As shown below, only 16 percent of all individual facility BACT decisions
for permits in the new NSR data base involved applicable NSPS.
DISTRIBUTION OF BACT DECISIONS BY POLLUTANT
Pollutant
PM
SO,
NO*
CO
VOC
Lead
Vinyl Chloride
Fluorides
H9SO. MIST
TRS *
Totals
Total BACT
Decisions
1,191
1,430
1,589
1,158
744
8
4
10
4
40
6,278
BACT Decisions
Subject to NSPS*
213
375
292
8
61
0
4
6
4
40
1,003
% of BACT Decisions
Subject to NSPS*
18%
26%
17%
.7%
8%
0
100%
60%
100%
100%
16%
28
-------
f\i
1 . 1
1 .0
N
0
0.9
P
E
R
M
I 0.8
T
S
S
U 0.7
K
J
E
C
T 0.6
T
A 0.5
L
I
S
S 0.4
U
E
D
0.3
A A
0.2 i
1
1
1
i
1
1
AUG7B MAR79 SEP79 AFR80 OCT80 MAYB1 NOV81
JUNB2 BEC82 JUL83 FEB84 AUGB4 MAR85
QUARTERLY BATE OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE 4-1. CHRONOLOGY OF THE FRACTION OF PSD PERMITS INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE APPLICABLE NSPS
DB 79-84
-------
A total of 6,278 BACT decisions were made on 2,095 emission units, an
average of 3 BACT reviews for each emission unit. Based on 397 permits in
the data base, this means that the "average" PSD permit required almost 16
BACT decisions. This is somewhat an overstatement, because many permits
involved identical emission units for which one could say that only a single
BACT decision was required.
4.1 NSPS COVERAGE OF PSD EMISSIONS
Table 4-1 shows the NSPS coverage of criteria pollutant (except lead)
PSD emissions increases in the new data base. The data shown are divided
into two source category groupings:
"Named" PSD sources types those subject to a 100 ton/year major
source threshold; and
Other PSD source types - those subject to a 250 ton/year major
source threshold.
As this table shows, except for VOC, NSPS is applicable to the named
PSD source types to a much greater degree than other source types.
Figures 4-2 through 4-6 present a history of the fractions of PSD
emissions of PM, S02, NOx, CO, and VOC that were subject to NSPS. These
figures reflect the ratios of emissions in tons/year on the basis of PSD
emissions permitted in calendar 3-month periods and includes data from both
the old and new data bases. As can be seen, there Ms a decreasing trend for
SOp and NOx emissions, probably due to the diminished influence of utility
sources in the more recent periods. Thus, NSPS coverage of PSD emissions
appears to depend on the mix of source types subject to PSD.
4.1.1 Distribution by EPA Region
As mentioned above, the degree to which PSD emissions are subject to
NSPS is dependent on the mix of source types subject to PSD. Furthermore,
this variability also applies to PSD emissions by EPA region where the mix
of source types varies from region to region.
30
-------
TABLE 4-1. DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONWIDE NSPS AND NON-NSPS EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR)
ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SOURCE TYPES IN DATA BASE
CO
Pollutant
PARTICULATE MATTER
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
SULFUR DIOXIDE
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
NITROGEN OXIDES
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
CARBON MONOXIDE
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
Emissions
for Named
PSD Sources
70,885
21,172
49,713
70%
772,788
167,852
604,936
78%
666,174
187,862
478,312
72%
225,295
219,803
5,492
2%
38,752
36,915
1,837
5%
Emissions
for Other
PSD Sources
23,209
20,479
2,730
12%
176,959
153,192
23,767
13%
120,544
63,299
57,245
47%
66,009
65,662
347
0.5%
17,499
14,281
3,281
18%
DB 81-84
Total
Emissions
94,094
41,651
52,443
56%
949,747
321,044
628,703
66%
786,718
251,161
535,557
68%
291,304
285,465
5,839
2%
56,252
51,197
5,055
9%
-------
1.2
GO
ro
I
I
1.1 +
E
M
I
S 1.0
S
I
0
N 0.9
S
U 0.8
T 0.7
0
N
S 0.6
T 0.5
9
A
I 0.4
F
E
F: 0.3
rt
I
1
T 0.2
E
0.1
O.O
A A
--A-
-_ +
AUG78
+
MAR79
+ + _-_
SEP79 AFR80
--- + 1 + +
OCT80 MAY81 NOV81 JUN82
aUftRTERLY DATE OF ISSUANCE
+ <.
CEC82 JUL83
1 1-
FEBB4
+ ---
AUG81
+ -
HAR85
FIGURE 4-2. CHRONOLOGY OF THE FRACTION OF PSD PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSPS
DB 79-84
-------
i .:> +
i. i
E
M
r
s i.o
s
I
0
N 0.9
S
o.s
T 0.7
°,
N
5 0.6
P
S
y
T
0
T
A
L
0.5
0.4
0.3
P
E
R
M
I
r
T 0.2
E
0.1
0.0 +
-- +
AUG78
A A
A A
-f
MAR79
+
SEP79
+
AFR80
+
OCT80
+
MAYB1
+
NCWB1
4--
JUM8:
4
DEC82
+
JUL83
A
+ ---
FEB81
+
AUG84
+ -
MAR85
DATE OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE 4-3. CHRONOLOGY OF THE FRACTION OF PSD SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSPS
DB 79-84
-------
1.0 t-
E
M 0.9
I
S
S
I
0 0.8
N
S
S
U 0.7
K
.1
I
0 0.6
N
S
P
S 0.5
* :
r
A 0.4
L
p
E
R 0.3
M
I
T
T
E 0.2
D
0.1
A
A
A
A A
A A
A A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A A
A
A A
A
UG7B MAR79 SEF79 APR80 OCTBO MAYB1 NOY81 JUNB2 DECB2 JULB3 FEBBt AUG81 MAR
QUARTERLY DATE OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE 4-4. CHRONOLOGY OF THE FRACTION OF PSD NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSPS
DB 79-84
-------
0. 18
E
M
I
S 0.16
I
(I
N
S 0.14
S
u
J 0.12
0
N 0.10
S
p
/
T
0
T
A
L
F
t
R
M
I
T
T
E
D
O.OB
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
-t
AUC7B
4
MAR79
---+---
SEP77
APP.80
^
OCT80
MAY81
- -f A _-
NOV81 JUK'82
DrtTE OF ISSUANCE
PEC82
JUL83
+ _--
FEB84
ftUGB'l
MftRSS
FIGURE 4-5. CHRONOLOGY OF THE FRACTION OF PSD CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSPS
DB 79-84
-------
CO
en
0.9
E
M
I
S 0.8
S
I
Cl
N
S 0.7
S
U
B
J 0.6
T
0
N 0.5
S
' f
S
T 0.4
0
T
A
L
0.3
E
ft
H
I 0.2
T
T
F
0.1
0.0
AUG78
MAR79
SEP79
APRBO OCT80 HAY81 NOV81 JUN82
QUARTERLY DATE OF ISSUANCE
A A
DEC82
JUL83
FEB8-4
AUG84 MAR85
FIGURE 4-6. CHRONOLOGY OF THE FRACTION OF PSD VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSPS
DB 79-84
-------
PERCENT OF PSD EMISSIONS SUBJECT TO NSPS
EPA Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National Average
PM
62%
86%
70%
51%
49%
75%
75%
4%
2%
74%
56%
so2
43%
60%
72%
57%
44%
83%
47%
7%
7%
74%
66%
NOx
44%
68%
81%
69%
56%
81%
69%
4%
11%
48%
68%
CO
0%
46%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
VOC
0%
12%
0%
9%
35%
2%
.1%
8%
0%
0%
9%
As shown above, only a small fraction (0-11 percent) of the five main
PSD pollutants emissions in EPA Regions VIII and IX are subject to NSPS.
4.1.2 Distribution by Source Type
Since 1973, NSPS has regulated large fossil fuel-fired steam
generators, both at utility and non-utility sources. Most of the emissions
at utility sources result from steam generation and thus, most of these
emissions are subject to NSPS. In contrast, emissions from non-utility
sources are a smaller fraction of the total emissions at these sources:
37
-------
Utility Emissions
(tons/vr)
-Pollutant
PM
so2
NOx
CO
VOC
Total
Total
26,600
445,000
434,000
52,000
1,500
932,500
Subject
to NSPS
21,000
425,000
397,000
0
0
843,000
% NSPS
79%
96%
92%
0%
0%
91%
Non-Utility Emissions
(tons/vr)
Total
67,500
505,000
353,000
239,000
55,000
1,220,000
Subject
to NSPS
31,400
204,000
139,000
6,000
5,000
385,400
% NSPS
47%
40%
39%
3%
9%
32%
As reported in the earlier NSR study, the fraction of PSD emissions
subject to NSPS for utility and non-utility sources were found to be
93 percent and 25 percent, respectively.
The tables in Appendix C of this report show the NSPS coverage of PSD
emissions for each of the 56 source types in the data base.
4.2 STRINGENCY OF BACT DECISION-MAKING
The criterion used to measure stringency of BACT decisions was
comparison to the allowable emissions rate of applicable NSPS's. Although
this is not a comprehensive measure, it provides an indication of permitting
stringency, especially for PM, S02 and NOx, where over two-thirds of the
emissions of these pollutants are subject to NSPS.
Shown below is a summary of emissions reductions beyond NSPS for PM,
S02, NOx, CO and VOC expressed as percent of total BACT-permitted emissions
in both the old and new data bases:
38
-------
BACT-PERMITTED EMISSION REDUCTION BEYOND NSPS
(EXPRESSED AS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL BACT-PERMITTED EMISSIONS)
Pollutant
PM
so2
NOx
CO
VOC
New (1984) Data Base
21
16
1.3
.05
.3
Old (1980) Data Base
24
33
8
4
(not reported)
The decrease in relative degree of emission reductions beyond NSPS
between the old and new data bases can probably be attributed to the
decreased influence of utility source emissions in the new data base as
shown below.
DISTRIBUTION OF UTILITY AND NON-UTILITY SOURCE PSD EMISSIONS
Pollutant
PM
so2
NOx
CO
VOC
Old Data
Utility
Emissions
(% of Total )
58%
75%
77%
39%
33%
Base
Non-Utility
Source
(% of Total )
42%
25%
23%
61%
67%
New
Utility
Emissions
(% of Total)
28%
47%
55%
18%
3%
Data Base
Non-Utility
Source
(% of Total )
72%
53%
45%
82%
97%
39
-------
4.2.1 Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS bv Source Type
Compared to the data presented in the original NSR report, two
significant differences in the distribution of emission reductions beyond
-NSPS-were._ found:
1. Reductions beyond NSPS for utility sources decreased
significantly; and
2. Reductions beyond NSPS for non-utility sources increased
significantly.
Tables 4-2a and 4-2b show a comparison of the new data base to the old.
The probable reason for the decrease in PM and SCL emission reductions at
utility sources is the revised utility boiler NSPS (40 CFR 60 Subpart Da)
which was promulgated in 1979, the effects of which occurred between
collection of the old and new data bases. The revised utility boiler NSPS
decreased the allowable emission rates significantly for PM (0.1 to
0.3 lb/m2 Btu) and S02 (1.2 to about 0.6 lbs/m2 Btu) from the original NSPS
(40 CFR 60 Subpart D) and thus, reduced the baseline from which emission
decreases are measured.
On the other hand, the increase in non-utility source emission
reductions beyond NSPS may, in part, be attributable to the fact that a
greater fraction of emissions from these sources are subject to NSPS in the
new data base compared to the old (32 percent versus 25 percent). The
contribution of utilities to total emission reductions beyond NSPS in both
the old and new data bases is shown in Table 4-2b.
Tables 4-3 through 4-7 show emission reductions beyond NSPS for NSPS
facilities for the pollutants PM, S02, NOx, CO and VOC, respectively.
Except for the PSD source categories indicated on these tables, the NSPS
facilities do not necessarily coincide with PSD source categories. For
instance, the industrial fossil-fuel-fired boiler facilities can be located
at almost any PSD source type, whereas electric utility boilers are located
only at utility source categories.
40
-------
TABLE 4-2a. COWARISON OF UTILITY AND NON-UTILITY SOURCE EMISSION REDUCTIONS BEYOMJ HSPS
Total BACT
Permitted
Emissions
Pollutant (tons/year)
PH 31.400
S02 569.400
NOx 549,900
CO 61.500
VOC 4,500
Old Data Base
Emission
Reductions
Beyond NSPS
(tons/year)
6.100
210,200
53,200
0
0
Percent
of Total
Utility
Emissions
19
37
10
0
0
Total BACT
Remitted
Emissions
(tons/ year)
26.600
445.000
434.000
52,000
1.500
H« Datfl Basfl
Emission
Reductions
Beyond NSPS
(tons/ year)
4,300
19,900
3,800
0
0
Percent
of Total
Utility
Emissions
16
S
1 "
0
0
Total BACT
Permitted
Emissions
Pollutant (tons/year)
PH 22.800
S02 192.400
NOx 162,500
CO 97.600
VOC 9,200
Old Data Base
Emission
Reductions
Beyond NSPS
(tons/ year)
1,600
8,500
1,200
3,000
(not reported)
Non-Utll
Percent
of Total
Won- Utility
Emissions
7
4
1
3
(not reported)
Total BACT
Permitted
Emissions
(tons/ year)
67.500
505.000
353,000
239,000
55,000
Nav Data Basa
Emission
Reductions
Beyond NSPS
(tons/ year)
12,900
128,000
6.000
160
130
Percent
of Total
Non-Utmty
Emissions
19
25
2
.1
.2
TABU «-a>. COWMUSON OF TOT*. MO UTllITY WCT EMISSION REDUCTIONS BEYOND NSPS FOR THE ORIGINAL AND UPDATED PSD DATA BASES
Orlataal Data HAM MQA1 Data ftau)
Pollltant
Part In 1 at* Mttor
Sill fir o1m14*
Nltrogan ox1*w
Carbon onoxlvo
Volatile organic
Total BACT
EBlnton
Redactions
Oomn0 NSPS
(tent/ year)
7.700
218.700
54.400
2.970
0
Utility BACT
EBlUlO*
narfrctlon
Boyon4 NSPS
(totn/yoar)
6.100
210.200
53.200
0
0
Percent Utility
Contribution
to Es1*»1on
naul
Total BACT
Ea)t»1on
RwliKtlon*
B^on4 NSPS
(ton*/y*ar>
17.200
147.932
9.771
isa
134
Utility BACT
Enliiton
R*d*ct1on«
BoyoM NSPS
(tonm/raar)
4.300
19.900
3.800
0
0
Parcant tlt1'i*y
CofltrlttntlM
to Enlttto*1
Radvctlon*
25.0
13.5
3B.«
0
0
DB 79-84
41
-------
TABU 4-3. NSPS AND BACT EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE EMISSION UNITS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR PARTICIPATE MATTER
IM..IH., ,,««.
f»«l-Ftf»* Fw1-flr*d "" C1 taker All Otlwr Production
B»tl*r* Boll.r. 1»clMr«t*r« HI* Coot.r FacllltlM Plint.
HECION 1 EMI 11 IONS
MPJ £-i»iM»* aos i.m is
MCT PvraltM WPS ((toft* 644 72* j IS
MCT (lUtlm «Mwctlo*« 161 47* *
SCION n ram i QMS
WPJ C-lMtD.*' I.4U OTT %tt
BKI (littwil fettoctlOM 0 t 14)
REGION I]] EMISSIONS
NSPS l»l.tlo«»* 125 SOt
BKI P*r*m*« WPS E*f»lMi 675 tS
BKT ((lo*i« PM»ctl(M» 0 413 ,
t*r&tt WJPS
ice j CM if EMMSICMS
HP] C»l*ftlo»i" S.707 ).SIS 4*3 2*7 1*1 J3
MCT F-«f*m*4 MSPS [*l**taMt 4.7)4 3. SIS IM 740 W SI
MCI e«Uiloni RMMrtlom IT3 0 )07 47 11 0
MGION V tMISllOM
KVS E»l*«lM^* SI7 1.7*1
MCT UU*lw>» tariwctlM* 174 0
MEG) ON Tl DnU|OM
MCT Pw«ltt«rf HOPS E*tMto»* »,*)l 6.7S1 2M
MCT Caliilaoi 6»*Ktt«M 4.0*0 * 0
REGION ru mijicm
NSPS l«lt»1on« MO
BKT r^r«1tt«< Wri CilutoBB MO
BKI (<!« iMrfvctlwii 0
HGION mi Em|3iom
MCT F-*r*1tt«4 HP! EBtHlMB
HECION II EMISSIONS
HPS CalulMi* »* 0
MCI P»nltt*« MSP1 EatMlM* l&t *3
KCION I OHUION3
H7S E«l>il***r I.M* 2.764 1.944 17* M 221
t*Cl P*r«ltt^ NIPS blMlw* »4* 2.T64 1S2 71 71 1)7
WCT C*t.l1»* iMMtlMM 6*1 1' 0^ 107 > M
TDTNL CHIS1IOHS
npi t.t..ic.i* n.*tr 16.114 4.m I.OM 1*0 774 is
MCT PmUM WSP1 C*IMI«> P.)7* 16. IH I.4M TM 744 1*0 11
MCT E«lMlM IM«eilv« «.73* T.6M J« 1* *4 0
PciralkM Rtflivrlkt mr'f*rj fl«-4rvr Krilt P»l« Hill*
4.170 6*S SI
110 k 140 0
M
(6
0
116 4)6 76 77T M S7 7.360 )M
176 4)6 76 M 6* S7 7.360 )M
0 00 1*4 0 000
714 Tfl 11
6S 70) SI
TO* M 0
27* 10.646 3* SI) *
744 ),4)l 31 Mi 9*
7* 7.71* 0 00
j
!
366 4 SIS M
)U 4 3IS 60
00 0 0 i
1
1,116 6*5 KtM 30 IO.*H 17* W 4.M* f 1* {
4. MO SSS 604 30 ),S*2 IT* 174 ).M1 SI* 1
136 140 0 0 7,402 0 TO* M * j
I
i
DM HMMfMiMrlMg Roch Pl*«it/ Total
Kiln PlMtt/Ktln Or^cr EvUilon*
2, OH
i.m
640
7.704
S93
77 1.416
16 *!
11 474
n* 1W 14.361
SI 1SF 17.670
o n i.ui
101 3.S07
101 ), on
0 471
7M 321 )7.612
T74 371 H.)|t
* 0 11. JM
MO
660
0
77 77
77 71
0 0
)))
741
*1
M 1,0**
M 4.VM
o i. in
1.26) 479 |*6 70.074
1.16) 414 IS7 Sl,*»
0 11 3* IT. MS
» »! ! Uut
«Ml« m«U If tlM MCT wliBlM rat* Vq
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-4. NSPS AND BACT EMISSIONS (in TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE EMISSION UNITS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE
REGION I EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions*
-BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions*
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions'
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions"
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION ₯1 EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions4
8ACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions*
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions*
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions*
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions
Beyond NSPS
Industrial
Fossil
Fuel-Fired
Boilers
8,805
7,495
1,310
11,468
11,468
0
98.186
79,892
18,294
3,780
3,662
118
168,010
158,215
9,795
13,940
4.060
9,880
304,189
264.792
39,397
Electric
Utility Fossil Sulfurlc
Fuel-Fired Add
Boilers Plants
17,476
11.651
5.825
16,500
16.500
0
90,010 8,960
82,178 8.960
7,832 0
36.250
36,250
0
160,640
151.677
8,963
8.664
8.664
0
43,636
20,000
23,636
373.176 8,960
326.920 8.960
46.256 0
Petroleum Refineries
Claus Stationary
FCCU Fuel Gas Sulfur Internal Stationary
Catalyst Combustion Recovery Combustion Gas
Regenerators Devices Plants Gas Engines Turbines
79 7,492 365 5 507
79 7,492 365 5 336
0 00 0 171
542 1,696
542 1,696
0 0
10 1.011
10 1,011
0 0
456 3,425 854 16,464
456 3,341 854 11.056
0 84 0 5,408
2
2
0
170
170
0
1,332
57,577
1.091.
S6.4868
535 11,629 1,219 5 78,5B9
535 11.555 U219 5 {£!£
0 84 o o 62, 195b
Emissions
8,805
7,495
-Ii310
37,392
31,396
5,996
16.500
16.500
0
199.394
173,268
26,126
41.041
40,933
118
349,849
325,599
24,250
8.666
8,666
0
170
170
0
1,332
115,153
25,151.
90,002
778,302
630,380
147,932°
56.064 tons of this reduction Has associated with gas turbines from 2 sources: NV* Alaskan Pipeline Company and ARCO Alaska. In
DB 81-84
43
-------
TABLE 4-5. NSPS AND BACT EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED KITH THOSE EMISSION UNITS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
REGION I EMISSIONS
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted MSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION VI EMSSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions'
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions*
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS
Industrial
Fossil Fuel-
Fired Boilers
4,215
1.189
8,778
8,778
0
30,810
29.513
1,297
3,804
3,218
586
129,196
125,882
3,314
11.354
8.552
2.802
189.346
180.158
9,188
Electric Utility _CDmbust1on Ena1nes__
Fossil Fuel- Gas Diesel Nitric Acid
Fired Boilers Engines Engines Plants
17.476 2.418
17,476 2,418
0 0
16.500
16,500
0
70.360 1.288 6.214 192
70.360 1.288 6.094 192
0 0 120 0
30,750 573
30,750 573
0 0
115.070 143 329
115,070 103 329
0 40 0
14,760
14,760
0
894
894
0
264.916 2.004 9,526 521
264.916 1,964 9.406 521
0 40 120 0
Stationary
Gas Turbines
89
79"
9
978
978
0
1.095
1.095
0
600
543
57
23,639
23,580
59
725
725
0
467
430
37
1,525
1,264
261
48,300
48,300
0
77,417
76,994
423
Total
Emissions
5,492
4,294 '
1.198
29,650
29,650
0
16,500
16,500
0
109,959
108.542
1.417
35,727
35,084
643
268,377
264,964
3.413
15.485
15.485
0
467
430
37
1.525
1.264
261
60,548
57,746
2,802
543,730
533.959
9,771
NSPS emissions ire those emissions that irould result 1f the BACT emission rate equaled the NSPS emission rate.
DB 81-84
44
-------
TABLE 4-6. NSPS AND BACT EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR)
ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE EMISSION UNITS THAT ARE
SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
Petroleum Refineries/
_FCCU Catalyst
Regenerators
REGION II EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3 2985
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions 2985
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS 0
REGION IV EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3 997
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions 997
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS 0
REGION VI EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3 2665
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions 2507
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS 158
TOTAL EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3 6647
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions 6489
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond NSPS 158
3NSPS emissions are those emissions that would result if the BACT
emission rate equaled the NSPS emission rate.
DB 81-84
45
-------
TABLE 4-7. NSPS AND BACT EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE EMISSION UNITS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CTi
Storage Vessels
for Petroleum
Liquids Built
. after 6/11/73 and
before 5/19/78
REGION II EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond
NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions 47
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions 47
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond 0
NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond
NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions9
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond
NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond
NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions3
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond
NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
NSPS Emissions 47
BACT Permitted NSPS Emissions 47
BACT Emission Reductions Beyond 0
NSPS
Storage Vessels Surface
for Petroleum Coating
Liquids Built of Metal
after 5/18/78 Furniture
937
937
0
172 408
172 274
0 134
10
10
0
80
80
0
1
1
0
142
142
0
1342 408
1342 274
0 134
Automobile and Light
Duty Truck Surface Industrial Metal
Coating Operations Surface Coll SOCMI
Prime Guide Top Coating Line: Surface Process Total
Coat Coat Coat Appliances Coating Fugitives Emissions
937
937
0
SB 500 500 715 34 2434
58, 500. 500, 715 34 2300
Ob Ob Ob 0 0 134
192 979 404 1585
192 979 404 1585
00 0 0
80
80
0
1
1
0
142
142
0
58 692 1479 715 404 34 5179
58 692 1479 715 404 34 5045
0000 0 0 134
aNSPS emissions are those emissions that would result If the BACT emission rate equaled the NSPS emission rate.
bN1ssan Motors 1n Tennessee received an exemption from the NSPSj thus they were permitted to exceed the NSPS by 702 TPY.
DB 81-84
-------
Similarly, Tables 4-8 through 4-12 show the frequency with which BACT
decisions were more stringent than NSPS. Individual BACT decisions for
emission units subject to NSPS were analyzed to determine if the allowable
emission rates were either equal to or more stringent than the emission
rates allowed by applicable NSPS's. The data in these tables are presented
by EPA region for each type of NSPS facility in the data base. The
percentages shown indicate the portion of BACT decisions involving the
specific facility type for which the allowable emissions in the PSD permit
were more stringent than NSPS. For instance, in Table 4-8, 38 percent of
the industrial fossil-fuel-fired boiler BACT decisions in EPA Region IV for
PM were more stringent than NSPS. On a national level, this value is
45 percent. The number shown in the bottom row of each table is the average
ratio of BACT to NSPS allowable emissions rates for those emission units
permitted below (more stringent) the NSPS rate. These average ratios are
calculated on the basis of individual BACT decisions and are not weighted by
the amount (tons/year) of pollutant emissions emitted from each facility.
For instance, Table 4-8 shows for those industrial boilers receiving
allowable PM emission rates more stringent than NSPS, thel average BACT
permitted rate is about half (.51) of the NSPS allowable rate.
4.2.2 Chronologic Comparison of BACT to NSPS Allowable Emission Rates
An attempt was made to determine long-term trends in BACT
decision-making relative to the NSPS development process. More specifically,
this attempt focused on trying to determine the roles that NSPS performance
standards play in BACT decisions. Figure 4-7 shows for all industrial
coal-fired boilers the allowable PM emission rates according to the date
that the PSD permit was issued. The points represented by the letter "N"
are for those boilers that are exempt from the NSPS because they are smaller
than the 250 m2 Btu/hr applicability threshold of the NSPS. The letter "S"
represents the allowable emission rates for those boilers that are subject
to the NSPS. Although it is difficult, and perhaps inappropriate to draw
specific conclusions from this figure, it appears that the NSPS for PM
played a greater role for exempt facilities than it did for affected
47
-------
TABLE 4-8. NUMBER OF EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER AT KSPS RATE A»C BELOW MSPS RATE
REGION 1 NSPS WITS
P***Ut*d for MCT *t NSPS lUto
P*r»ltt*» for MCT Ml» NSPS Hit-
t KSPS Unit* P«r»lttM h*)o.
NSPS R4t»
MG10N II MSPS UNITS
P«r»m*4 for MCT It NSP] Kit*
f>«r*illt«4 lor MCt to In NSPS fUto
MSPS U*IU Poralttod holm
HSPS IUU
KGIOM til NSPS WITS
Por.ltt*4 for MCT it NSPS R«U
Por*1|to4 for MCT »«tov NSPS Rat*
1 NSPS I* lit PonltM bolt*
ICGIOM IV NSPS UNITS
P*r»ltt*« lor MCT «t NSPS Roto
P»r*l|to4 for MCT fcolo* NSPS IUU
S NSPS Unlit P«r*Ut*d ooto*
NSPJ Mil*
MGIOH V NSPS WITS
P.r»m»« for MCI ( NSPS t»t.
Pvrvltto*1 for MCT Mia* MSPS lUto
1 NSPS Unlit Por*lttM Mho»
MC10N VI MSPS WITS
Pirwm* for MCT it M5PS (Ut»
P*r«Mto4 for MCT Mlu* NSPS Kit*
I kx-i mill PoniitM lo* '
MGIOM VII NSPS UNITS
P«r.ltt*« for MCT »t N5T| fato
MSPS Unlti PorBlttB* *o1o>
MC10N fill NSP1 UNITS
P«r«ui*4 for MCT ! NSTS IUt«
Por«l|U4 far MCT holo* HSPS M»t«
NSPS Unit, rvlltotf Mlw
HSPS toto
REGION II NST-S WITS
Por«ltt*4 for MCT at «SP» IUU
1 MSPS Unit* Por«ltt*4 feolo*
NSPI tUt*
REGION 1 NSPS WITS
F*r*lnoo' for BKT it NSPS Rat*
I NSPS Until Por*.m»ri *!*
NSPS IUU
TVTM. NSPS UNITS
PoralttW for MCT *)<» BSPS (UW
B NSPS UBlli Pw«ltt-4 W1**
KSPS tot*
lUtl* of MCT to NSPS A1I.M.U
p*r*itttw ) ten R*t*
InAittrlil
f"2n'*rT
»
e
i
1MB
S
S
0
OB
It
10
MB
1
1
7
n
11
i
e
46*
«
f
Off
»
M
»
111
.SI
Ctoctrlc
"in!?
1
0
OB
1
1
0
OB
S
s
0
I
0
;
0
(
1
1
OB
4
4
0
OB'
n
a
0
01
-
lncl«*r«tor» K(U
0
1001
1
0
]
100B
0
100B
4 I
0 I
4 1
un SOB
i
i
0
OB
f
1
SOB
1 1
0 0
3 1
10V 100B
n *
0 i
n J
1001 SOI
.'1 .S?
FltralftNl FHHtVln PrlMrv ta*l
Cllnkar All Dttwr ProdiKtlOn FCOJ Citcl^t Co-tuillun Potroo* AM>«> TkorM) Coal Clactrlc
CooUr FtcitltlM Plmti KagoMritar* D**lc*t Grou» W>« PI wit Orrloo HMdllng Arc F.DI.CO
]
]
0
OB
1 17 1
1 * 1
1 ) 0
)M 241 OB
OB
I 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 « 1 21011
10 0 00100
SOB OB 01 01 OB 100B 01 OB
2
1001
1 ! 1
2 ia o
«n IOTA «
t
I
0
OB
It 11
01 II
11 00
100B SOI 01 01
1
SOS Till 3101 t
1 T 1 « » S 2111
t 1 S 10 0110 2
IQB in « 41B 1U OB OB Ml « SOB
.n .» o .« -it -- .« -- «
JSS7
0
0
01
2
501
1
5
0
OB
1
14
1)
1
n
.n
,.f« P.I. Hilt!
Dlttolvlng
T
1
0
OB
1
OB
1
I
0
01
I
12
12
0
n
i!" "SSuSilr
1
1001
t
0
1
V
2 1
1 1
0 0
OB M
1
1
1
10 1
Ifl 1
0 1
01 in
.«
Rock NSPS
14
1
It
m
7
WJI
t
en
1 IS
1 IT
SK 7*1
11
i
4ii
Si
n
'M
1
I
1
4
»
2 711
1 110
1 »
soi m
.AT .61
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-9. NUMBER OF EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE AT NSPS RATE AND FLOW HSPS RATE
REGION I NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT it NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo* NSPS Rate
* NSPS Units Permitted Below
NSPS Rite
REGION II NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT »t NSPS R«te
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rite
I NSPS Unit] Permitted below
NSPS Rite
REGION III NSPS UNITS
Permitted for SACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rite
X NSPS Unit: Permitted below
NSPS Rite
REGION IV NSPS UNITS
Permitted for SACT it NSPS Rite
Permitted for 3ACT belo* NSPS Rate
I NSPS Units Permitted belo*
NSPS Rate
REGION VI NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT it NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
* NSPS Units Permitted below
NSPS Rate
REGION VI NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo. NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted belo.
NSPS Rate
REGION VII NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo* NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted belo*
NSPS Rate
REGION VIII NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rite
Permitted for SACT belo« NSPS Rat*
* NSPS Units Permitted belo*
NSPS Rate
REGION IX NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
I NSPS Units Permitted belo.
NSPS Rate
REGION X NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rite
Permitted for BACT belo* NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted belo*
NSPS Rite
TOTAL NSPS UNITS
Permuted for BACT it NSPS Rate
Permuted for BACT belo* NSPS Rite
X NSPS Units Permitted below
NSPS Rite
Ratio of BACT to NSPS Allowable
Emission Rite for Emission Units
Permitted below NSPS Rate
Industrial
Fossil
Fuel-fired
Boilers
2
1
I
501
4
4
0
ox
28
18
10
36X
2
1
I
501
13
9
4
3 IX
6
2
4
671
55
35
20
36X
.67
Electric
Utility
Fossil Sulfurtc
Fuel-fired Acid
Boilers Plants
1
0
i
100X
1
I
0
m
5 5
2 S
3 0
60X 0!
2
2
0
m
a
7
i
I3X
1
1
0
0*
4
0
4
100X
22 5
13 5
9 0
4U OX
.64
Pefrolfl|IM p«flnnrlA
Claus
FCCU Fuel Gas Sulfur
Catalyst Combustion Recovery
1 U 1
1 M 1
0 00
ox ox ox
6
6
0
OS
5
5
0
OS
1 73 4
I 72 3
0 1 1
OX 1.4X 2SX
3
3
0
or,
9
9
0
or,
2 110 5
2 109 4
0 I 1
OX 0.9X 20X
.30 .996
Stationary
Internal Stationary
Combustion Gas
Gas Engines Turbines
1
1
0
OX
2 32
2 0
0 32
OX 100X
1
I
0
ox
3
3
0
ox
15
12
3
201
1
1
0
0!
10
7
3
301
111
2
109
9BX
2 174
2 27
0 147
OX 84X
.28
Total
NSPS
Units
3
2
1
33X
55
22
33
60X
1
1
0
IK
45
32
13
29X
12
11
1
ax
114
104
10
91
S
5
0
K
9
9
0
01
10
7
3
30J
121
4
117
97X
375
197
178
47X
.35
DB 81-84
49
-------
TABLE 4-10. NUMBER OF EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR NITROGEN OXIDES AT NSPS RATE AND BELOW NSPS RATE
REGION I NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permuted for BACT belo* NSPS Rate
% NSPS Units Permitted belo« NSPS Rate
REGION II NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo. NSPS Rate
% NSPS Units Permitted belo« NSPS Rate
REGION III NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo. NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted belo. NSPS Rate
REGION IV NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo. NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted belov NSPS Rate
REGION V NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permittee) belo* NSPS Rate
REGION VI NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo» NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted belo. NSPS Rate
REGION VII NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo» NSPS Rate
* NSPS Units Permitted belo* NSPS Rate
REGION VIII NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo» NSPS Rate
I NSPS Units Permitted belo. NSPS Rate
REGION IX NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo* NSPS Rate
f NSPS Units Permitted belo. NSPS Rate
REGION X NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo« NSPS Rate
% NSPS Units Permuted belo. NSPS Rate
TOTAL NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT belo« NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted belo* NSPS Rate
Ratio of BACT to NSPS Allowable Emission
Rate for Emission Units Permitted belox
NSPS Rate
Fossil
Fuel-fired
Boilers
2
1
1
sm
4
4
0
0*
23
IB
5
22*
3
2
I
33X
10
7
3
30X
6
0
6
100X
46
32
16
33X
.69
Electric
Ut 1 1 1 ty
Fossil
Fuel -fired
Boilers
1
1
0
or,
i
i
0
or.
s
5
0
OX
2
2
0
05
7
7
0
OX
1
1
0
Of
17
17
0
OX
.
Nitric Combustion
Acid Gas
Plants Engines
1 14
1 14
0 0
OX OX
.3
3
0
m
i i
1 0
0 I
m loox
2 18
2 17
0 I
OX 5.5Z
.77
Engines
Diesel
Engines
1
1
0
or,
18
2
16
89X
6
6
0
m
25
9
16
64X
.91
Stationary
Gas
Turbines
1
0
1
100X
35
35
0
or,
I
1
0
ox
3
1
2
67%
21
17
"4
19*
1
1
0
OX
2
0
2
100%
7
6
1
14X
111
111
0
m
182
172
10
5.SX
.67
Total
NSPS
Units
3
I
2
67J
41
41
0
OX
1
1
0
ox
62
41
21
34X
11
8
3
271
40
32
8
20X
2
2
0
m
2
0
2
100X
7
6
I
14X
123
117
6
5X
292
249
43
15X
.77
DB 81-84
50
-------
TABLE 4-11. NUMBER OF EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR
CARBON MONOXIDE AT NSPS RATE AND BELOW NSPS RATE
Petroleum
Refineries/
FCCU Catalyst
Regenerators
REGION II NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS rate
% NSPS units permitted below NSPS rate
3
3
0
0%
REGION IV NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS rate
% NSPS units permitted below NSPS rate
1
1
0
0%
REGION VI NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS rate
% NSPS units permitted below NSPS rate
4
2
2
50%
TOTAL NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS rate
% NSPS units permitted below NSPS rate
Ratio of BACT to NSPS allowable emission
rate for emission units permitted below
NSPS rate
8
6
2
25%
.92
DB 81-84
51
-------
TAGLE 4-12. NUMBER OF EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO NSPS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AT NSPS RATE AND BELOW NSPS RATE
cn
ro
Storage Vessels
for Petroleum
Liquids Built
after 6/11/73 and
before 5/19/78
REGION II NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
% NSPS Units Permitted below
NSPS Rate
REGION IV NSPS UNITS 6
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate 6
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate 0
% NSPS Units Permitted below 0%
NSPS Rate
REGION V NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
% NSPS Units Permitted below
NSPS Rate
REGION VI NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
% NSPS Units Permitted below
NSPS Rate
REGION VII NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
X NSPS Units Permitted below
NSPS Rate
REGION VIII NSPS UNITS
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate
% NSPS Units Permitted below
NSPS Rate
TOTAL NSPS UNITS 6
Permitted for BACT at NSPS Rate 6
Permitted for BACT below NSPS Rate 0
% NSPS Units Permitted below NSPS Rate °"
Ratio of BACT to NSPS Allowable Rate
for Emission Units Permitted Below
NSPS Rate
Storage Vessels Surface
for Petroleum Coating
Liquids Built of Metal
after 5/18/78 Furniture
1
1
0
0%
28 1
28 0
0 1
m 100%
6
6
0
or,
i
i
0
0%
i
i
0
oz
1
1
0
0?,
38 1
38 0
0 1
OZ 100%
.67
Automobile and Light
Duty Truck Surface Industrial
Coating Operations Surface
Prime Guide Top Coating Line:
Coat Coat Coat Appliances
111 1
111 1
000 0
07. 0% 0% 0%
1 3
1 2
0 1
OS 337.
124 1
123 1
001 0
0% 0% 25% OZ
.23
Metal
Coll SOCHI Total
Surface Process NSPS
Coating Fugitives Units
1
1
0
OS
7 46
7 45
0 1
0* 2%
I 11
1 10
0 1
0% 9%
1
1
0
03
1
1
0
oz
1
1
0
0?,
1 7 61
1 7 59
0 02
OZ 0% 3%
DB 81-84
-------
en
CO
0.33 + s = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0.30
El
A
C 0.27
r
M 0.24
I
S
S
1 0.21
0
N
R 0 . 1 B
A
r
E
0. 15
B 0.12
0.09
0.06
0.03 4
I
I
I
0.00 +
N---S-_SN__NS-_S_-NS_NS NS N s__g
NSPS Level
N N
N
NN N
N N N
S
N N N S
N
N
N
S
S N N N H 5
S
N N
NN SN
S S
N
N N N N
I
MAR7?
SEP79 APRBO
OCI80 MAY81 NOV81 JUNB2 DEC82 JULB3 FEB81 AU084 MAR85 SEP83
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE 4-7. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL-FIRED INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
facilities. For instance, 11 of the 19 (58 percent) BACT decisions for
affected (subject) facilities were permitted below the NSPS level. However,
41 of the 56 (73 percent) BACT decisions for exempt facilities were more
stringent than the NSPS allowable emission rate, even though the NSPS did
not apply. This observation is not reflected in Figure 4-8 for SC^
emissions rates, but is again the case for NOx, as shown in Figure 4-9.
Similar figures for other types of facilities for which NSPS's exist are in
Appendix E. However, figures are presented only for facilities for which
more than four BACT decisions were found in both the old and new data bases.
It must be pointed out that the data points on these figures represent BACT
decisions and not necessarily individual facilities. For instance, two (or
more) identical facilities specified in the same PSD permit would be
represented by a single point if their allowable emission rates were the
same.
4.3 REGIONAL COMPARISON OF BACT DECISION MAKING
As discussed in the introduction of this report, all of the emission
units in the NSR data bases were aggregated into categories and assigned
codes. A hierarchy of codes were established that identify the specific
emission unit type, the fuel(s) combusted or materials process and, in some
cases, the types of sources at which the emission units are located. (The
designations of these codes are in Appendix B.) This provided the
flexibility to search and sort the data base for emission units by type,
size, fuels used, emission rates, and source locations.
A particular feature of this coding scheme is the ability to perform
regional comparisons of BACT decision making.
Except for industrial and utility boilers, Appendix D of this report
contains many tables that show the average and standard deviations of
allowable emission rates for most data base (new data base only) emission
units by pollutant, and by EPA region and national average. Emission units
for which only a few (generally less than five) BACT decisions could be
found are not presented. Tables 4-13 through 4-17 show, by pollutant and
fuel type, regional BACT comparisons for industrial boilers and Tables 4-18
through 4-20 show the same information for utility boilers.
54
-------
tn
en
3,0
F: 1 .8
(t
T
£
1 .5
1 .2
0.9
O.t
0.3
C -
N =
Emission Units Subject to NSPS
Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0.0
--t ---
MAR79
N N
N N
N
N' NN N
N N NN K'
N N
N
N N
3 S--S
S S-S S--S SN-
S N S N
NSP_S_ Leve
+ _ _ i j _ _ _ i
~T T f. .
SEF79 APRBO DCTBO MAY81
NOV61 JUNB2 DEC82 JUL83 FE684
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
MAR85 SEPB5
FIGURE 4-8.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL-FIRED INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
en
cr>
O.B
B
A
C
r 0.7
f.
M
I
S O.A
S
1
0
H
0.5
R
A
T
E
0.4
L
E<
/ 0.3
M
M
B
T 0,2
U
0.1
i
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
t
N M
NN N N HKHK S UK
N N S
N
t S
S S
N N
N
0,0
S-NNN K'-S-N SSNN
N N N
N
NN N N NK'N' N M N
S
S N
NSPS Level
--t ---
MAR79
SEP79 APR80
+ ^
OCTBO MAV81
+ + + + + + _. + + _
NOV81 JUNB2 DEC82 JULB3 FE6B1 AUGB-1 HARB5 SEPB5
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE 4-9.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL-FIRED INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
TABLE 4-13. MEAN PARTICIPATE MATTER BACT EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS3 SEGREGATED BY FUEL TYPE, BOILER SIZE AND EPA
Coal-fired Boll*
REGION I
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION II
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION III
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IV
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM 8tu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
NATIONWIDE
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
Number
of
Boilers
5
1
0
6
3
0
2
5
0
1
0
1
5
9
18
32
15
18
0
33
0
0
7
7r
1
4
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
29
35
28
92
Mean BACT
Rate
(Ib/MM Btu)
.088 t
.080 +
0
.087 ±
.033 *
0
.100 +
.060 ±
0
.100 +
0
.100 ±
.202 +
.088 +
.068 +
.095 ±
.033 *
.061 +
0
.048 i
0
0
.066 +
.066 +
.055 +
.035 +
0
.039 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.030 i
.034 i
.031 ±
.073 +
.065 i
.069 ±
.068 ±
.016
.000
.015
.000
.000
.037
.000
.000
.103
.042
.031
.068
.014
.028
.027
.026
.026
.000
.010
.012
.000
.000
.002
.075
.035
.029
.050
Coal /Hood-f 1 red
Boilers
Number
of
Boilers
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
e
10
0
1
2
3
3
0
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
5
4
3
21
28
Mean BACT
Rate
! Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
.080 +
.080 i
0
0
.100 +
.100 +
0
0
0
0
.100 +
.100 *
.113 +
.110 ±
0
.080 +
.080 *
.080 +
.100 +
0
.083 t
.090 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.047 *
.061 +
.058 ±
.100 ±
.076 +
.091 +
.091 t
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.035
.031
.000
.028
.020
.000
.020
.017
.000
.035
.031
.000
.027
.034
.030
Hood- fired Boll
Number
of
Boilers
4
0
0
4
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
5
3
4
12
ers
Mean BACT
Rate
(Ib/MM Btu)
.080 +
0
0
.080 +
0
0
.100 +
.100 ±
0
0
0
0
.100 *
.250 «
0
.175 ±
0
0
0
0
0
.090 +
.100 +
.093 +
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.022 t
.022 *
.084 *
.143 t
.061 +
.091 *
.084
.084
.000
.000
.000
.000
.106
.000
.000
.006
.017
.017
.074
.092
.046
.072
nil-fired Boilers . Gas^fl
Number Mean BACT Number
of Rate of
Boilers (Ib/MM Btu) Boilers
7
0
0
7
2
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
28
5
0
33
8
5
0
13
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
48
11
0
59
.197 ±
0
0
.197 ±
.040 ±
.084 +
0
.055 ±
0
0
0
0
.068 +
.090 +
0
.071 ±
.100 +
.075 ±
0
.090 ±
.100 *
0
0
.100 ±
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.092 +
.083 +
0
.091 ±
.182
.182
.000
.000
.025
.051
.000
.048
.124
.038
.098
.000
.000
.101
.025
.091
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
4
5
3
12
red Boilers
Mean BACT
Rate
(Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
.035 +
.035 ±
0
0
0
0
.018 ±
0
.010 i
.014 1
0
0
0
0
.010 +
.006 +
0
.008 i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.100 +
0
.100 ±
.014 +
.044 *
.124 *
.054 t
.000
.000
.004
.000
.005
.000
.000
.002
.000
.000
.005
.051
.197
.100
Sol Id/Liquid/Gas
ruination Boilers
Number Mean BACT
of Rate
Boilers (Ib/MM Btu)
1
1
0
0
1
5
5
14
0
1
1
2
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
6
11
22
.080 *
.080 ±
0
.100 *
.208 ±
.100 ±
.110 ±
.142 ±
0
.059 +
.060 ±
.060 i
0
0
.071 +
.071 +
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.208 +
.093 +
.089 +
.11' ±
.000
.000
.000
.089
.022
.072
.000
.000
.001
.033
.033
.089
.017
.031
.068
Includes 3 utility boilers that were subject to Subpart 0.
Includes ot1/gas-f1red boilers.
DB 81-84
57
-------
TAELE 4-14.ISAM SULFUR DIOXIDE BACT EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS" SEGREGATED BY FUEL TYPE, BOILER SIZE AND EPA REGION
Coal /Wood-fired
REGION I
0-100 MM Btu/hr
-100-250 t« Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION II
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 1* Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION III
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 IV Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IV
0-100 MM 8tu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
0-100 KM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
NATIONWIDE
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
Number
of
Boilers
5
1
0
6
3
0
2
S
0
1
0
1
5
9
19
32
15
IB
0
33
0
0
7
7
1
7 "
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
29
38
28
95
Mean BACT
Rate
Ub/MM Btu)
1.80 + 0.00
1-.80 * 0.00
0
1.80 i 0.00
0.30 + 0.00
0
1.20 ± 0.00
0.66 + 0.49
0
0.90 + 0.00
0
0.90 ± 0.00
1.75 ± 0.75
1.44 + 0.34
1.05 + 0.19
1.27 + 0.44
1.58 + 0.26
1.54 + 0.36
0
1.56 i 0.31
0
0
1.05 i 0.30
1.05 ± 0.30
1.16 + 0.00
1.88 t 0.19
0
1.79 + 0.31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.23 * 0.00
0.23 * 0.00
0.23 1 0.00
1.50 + 0.55
1.50 + 0.47
1.03 + 0.26
1.36 + 0.49
Bol lers
Number
of
Boilers
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
8
10
0
1
2
3
3
0
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
5
4
3
21
28
rean BACT
Rate
(Ib/WI Etu)
0
0
0.90 i 0.00
0.90 ± 0.00
0
0
0.35 * 0.00
0.35 i 0.00
0
0
0
0
0.10 + 0.00
1.60 t 0.00
1.13 + 0.19
1.08 ± 0.41
0
1.20 + 0.00
1.16 ± 0.06
1.17 i 0.05
1.20 + 0.00
0
1.00 ± 0.23
1.09 ± 0.20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.17 + 0.00
0.45 + 0.50
0.39 i 0.45
0.93 ± 0.55
0.99 * 0.74
0.89 + 0.40
0.91 i 0.44
Wood- fired Boilers
Number
of
Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
5
(lean OACT
Rate
lib/
0
0
0
0
0
0
.041 ±
.041 ±
0
0
0
0
0
.180 +
0
.180 ±
0
0
0
0
0
.030 ±
.045 +
.035 i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.080 +
.043^
.064 +
Btu)
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.009
.087
.003
.045
Otl-f1red Boilers
Number
of
Boilers
8
0
o "
8
5
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
28
5
0
33
8
5
0
13
6
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
95
11
0
106
Mean BACT
Rate
(Ib/MM Btu)
2.16 + 0.40
0
o -
2.16 i 0.40
0.16 + 0.17
0.34 + 0.00
0
0.19 ± 0.17
0
0
0
0
1.03 + 0.59
1.09 + 0.02
0
1.04 ± 0.54
1.03 * 1.21
0.94 + 0.50
0
0.99 ± 0.97
0.64 + 0.14
0
0
0.64 ± 0.14
0
0
0
0"
0
0
0
0
1.20 + 0.00
0
0
1.20 + 0.00
0
0
0
0
1.12 * 0.62
0.95 * 0.39
0
1.11 ± 0.60
Solld/Llquld/Gas
Gas-fired Boilers
Number
of
Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
I
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
4
5
0
10
Moan EACT
Rate
(lb/l»l
0
0
0
0
0
0
.100 +
.100 i
0
0
0
0
.373 *
0
0
.373 ±
0
0
0
0
.001 +
.001 +
0
.001 i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.003 +
0
.003 ±
.224 *
.002 +
0
.112 ±
Btu)
.000
.000
.271
.271
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
?nn
.001
.209
Combination Boilers.
Number
of
Boilers
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
5
4
5
14
0
1
1
2
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
6
11
22
Mean BACT
Rate
Ob/MM Etu)
0
0
-1.-20 ± 0.00
1.20 * 0.00
0
0
0
0
0
2.50 + 0.00
0
2.50 + 0.00
1.10 * 1.46
2.77 * 1.40
0.71 + 0.32
1.44 ± 1.39
0
1.67 ± 0.00
0.02 ± 0.00
0.85 t 1.17
0
0
0.62 + 0.67
0.62 ± 0.67
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.10 + 1.46
2.54 + 1.17
0.66 + 0.50
1.27 ± 1.23
Includes 3 utility boilers that were subject to Subpart 0.
Includes oll/gas-Hred boilers.
DB 81-84
58
-------
TABLE 4-15. (CAN NITROGEN OXIDE BACT EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS* SEGREGATED BY FUEL TYPE. BOILER SIZE AND EPA REGION
CMl-f1red Boilers
Number Mean BACT
of Rate
Boilers (lb/MM Btu)
REGION I
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION 11
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION III
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IV
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
NATION»IDE
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
5
1
0
6
3
0
2
5
0
1
0
1
5
9
18
32
15
18
0
33
0
0
7
7
1
7
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
29
38
28
95
.700 +
.700 *
0
.700 +
.420 +
0
.700 t
.532 *
0
.700 +
0
.700 ±
.626 +
.671 +
.656 +
.655 i
.621 ±
.639 +
0
.631 ±
0
0
.657 +
.657 ±
.500 +
.626 +
0
.610 i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.600 +
.500 +
.567 i
.611 +
.645 +
.654 +
.637 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.153
.000
.000
.043
.045
.068
.059
.029
.050
.042
.079
.079
.000
.000
.057
.000
.000
.058
.081
.048
.073
.069
Coal/Kood-flred
Nunber
of
Boilers
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
8
10
0
1
2
3
3
0
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
5
4
3
21
28
Mean BACT
Rate
(lb/MM Btu)
0
0
.450 ±
.450 +
0
0
.700 +
.700 +
0
0
0
0
.600 +
.930 +
.663 +
.683 ±
0
.700 +
.700 t
.700 +
.700 +
0
.580 +
.631 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.500 +
.490 +
.492 +
.675 *
.710 +
.611 +
.631 t
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.074
.111
.000
.000
.000
.000
.139
.117
.000
.080
.070
.050
.215
.113
.120
(fpg.d.-f 'i-nrf Rollers 011-fl
Number
of
Boilers
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
3
4
8
Mean BACT
Rate
(lb/MM Btu)
.350 *
0
0
.350 i
0
0
.150 +
.150 ±
0
0
0
0
0
1.19 »
0
1.19 ±
0
0
0
0
0
.120 +
.200 *
.147 *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.190 *
.190 +
.350 *
-.477 t
.183 +
.314 t
.000
.000
.000
.000
0.00
0.00
.000
.000
.046
.028
.028
.000
.618
.028
.362
b
r«rt Rollers
Number Mean BACT
of Rate
Boilers (lb/»* Btu)
4
0
0
4
5
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
17
5
0
22
7
4
0
11
6
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
0
0
42
0
0
0
0
81
10
0
91
.560 ±
0
0
.560 +
.212 i
.300 i
0
.227 i
0
0
0
0
.220 *
.410 +
0
.263 ±
.303 +
.283 +
0
.295 ±
.230 ±
0
0
.230 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.169 +
0
0
.169 i
0
0
0
0
.218 +
.348 +
0
.232 i
.231
.231
.016
.000
.039
.101
.000
.120
.068
.035
.057
.077
.077
.004
.004
.112
.069
.115
Gas-ftnM FVlllera -
Sol1d/L1qu1d/Gas
_Comb'nat1on Boilers
Number Mean BACT Numoer >«n om,i
of Rate of Rate
Boilers (lb/MM Btu) Boilers _Hb/MM Btul
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
2
3
1
1
0
2
7
4
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
2
11
7
3
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
.200 i
.200 ±
.270 ±
0
0
.270 ±
.130 *
0
.300 ±
.243 ±
.200 +
.170 +
0
.185 ±
.151 +
.107 +
0
.135 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.100 +
0
0
.100 i
0
.200 +
0
.200 ±
.160 *
.143 +
.267 t
.169 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.098
.000
.000
.021
.057
.009
.050
.000
.000
.000
.000
.062
.046
.058
.068
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
5
4
5
14
0
1
1
2
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
6
11
22
.700 i
.700 ±
0
0
.700 ±
0
.700 ±
.384 +
.650 +
.354 ±
.449 ±
0
1.12 *
.380 +
.750 ±
0
0
.415 +
.415 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.384 ±
.737 ±
.410 ±
.493 t
.000
.000
.000
.000
.344
.100
.201
.262
0.00
.000
.523
.329
.3.29
.344
.204
.242
.290
Includes 2 utility bo11«rs that wen* subject to Subpart 0.
Includ** o1l/gn-f1r*d bo1l«rs.
DB 81-84
59
-------
TABLE 4-16. MEAN CARBON MONOXIDE BACT EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS* SEGREGATED BY FUEL TYPE, BOILER SIZE AND EPA REGION
REGION I
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION II
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION III
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IV
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
NATIONWIDE
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
Number
of
Boilers
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
7
15
24
4
7
0
11
0
0
3
3
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
9
18
18
45
Coal /Wood- fired
Boilers
Mean BACT Number
Rate of
(Ib/MM Btu) Boilers
0
0
0
0
.040 ±
0
0
.040 t
0
0
0
0
.060 »
.122 *
.062 *
.079 t
.085 +
.184 +
0
.149 *
0
0
.243 +
.243 ±
0
.050 +
0
.050 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.114 ±
0
.114 ±
.064 +
.137 +
.092 +
.105 +
.000
.000 .
.014
.110
.046
.072
.006
.061
.069
.309
.309
.000
.000
.000
.000
.022
.087
.134
.104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
5
0
0
I
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
7
9
Hood-fired Boilers
Mean BACT Number
Rate of
(Ib/MM Btu) Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.170 ±
.143 +
.148 +
0
0
.100 +
.100 +
0
0
.385 +
.385 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.200 +
0
.200 +
0
.185 +
.206 t
.201 +
.000
.065
.058
.000
.000
.332
.332
.000
.000
.021
.189
.164
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
3
6
011-flrad Boilers*
Gas-fired Bolle
irs
Sol1d/Ltqu1d/Gas
Combination Boilers
Mean BACT Number Mean BACT Number Mean BACT Number Mean BACT
Rate of Rate of Rate of Rate
(Ib/MM Btu) Boilers (Ib/MM Btu) Boilers (Ib/MM Btu) Boilers (Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
.220 ±
.220 i
0
0
0
0
0
.240 +
0
.240 ±
0
0
0
0
0
.110 t
.460 +
.227 +
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.220 +
.220 +
0
.153 +
.300 +
.227 ±
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.202
.000
.000
.075
.139
.128
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
1
0
13
3
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
55
2
0
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.111 ±
.034 +
0
.105 +
.035 +
.400 ±
0
.126 i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.042 ±
0
0
.042 ±
0
0
0
0
.057 +
.217 +
0
.062 ±
.249
.000
.239
.009
.000
.183
.000
.000
.116
.259
.122
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
5
2
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.100 +
.100 i
0
0
0
0
.017 ±
.018 +
0
.018 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.018 +
0
.018 ±
.017 +
.018 +
.100 +
.036 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
.001
.000
.000.
.000
.000
.000
.363
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
4
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.09 ±
0
.245 +
.668 ±
0
0
.200 +
.200 ±
0
0
.014 +
.014 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
1.09 ±
o
.144 +
.414 ±
0.00
.007
.488
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
0.00
. 120
.472
Include* ol1/g»s-fIred bo11«rs.
DB 81-84
60
-------
TABU 4-17. MEAN VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND BACT EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS1 SEGREGATED BY FUEL TYPE, BOILER SIZE AND EPA REGION
Coal-fired Roller*
REGION I
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 I* Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION II
0-100 I* Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Totil
REGION III
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Totil
REGION IV
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
NATIONWIDE
0-100 MM Btu/hr
100-250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
Number
of
Boiler;
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
5
9
2
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
6
12
Mean BACT
Rate
(lb/1* Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.035 +
.040 +
.017 *
.026 ±
.040 +
0
0
.040 ±
0
0
.014 *
.014 *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.038 +
.040 *
.016 ±
.027 ±
.007
.000
.004
.012
.000
.000
.000
.000
.005
.000
.003
.012
Coal /Wood- fired
Bo1 lars
Number Mean BACT
of Rate
Boilers (Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.140 + .000
0
.140 ± .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
.148 * .011
.148 + .011
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.110 + .000
0
.110 ± .000
0
.125 * .021
.148 ± .011
.135 + .019
Kood-f1red Boilers 011-f1r»rf Roller!* Gas-f Irad.8
-------
TABLE 4-18. MEAN PARTICULATE MATTER 8ACT EMISSION RATES FOR UTILITY BOILERS SEGREGATED BY FUEL TYPE, BOILER SIZE AND EPA REGION
REGION I
<2SO MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION II
<2SO MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION III
<2SO MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IV
<2SO MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
<250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
<250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
<1SO MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
<2SO MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
<250 MH Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
NATIONWIDE
<250 MM Stu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
Coal-f Ired
Number
of Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
s
5
0
2
2
0
9
8
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
21
21
Boilers
Mean BACT Rate
(Ib/MM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.030 ±
.030 ±
0
.030 +
.030 +
0
.030 +
.030 ±
0
.030 +
.030 ±
0
.030 »
.030 i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.030 ±
.030 i
0
.030 +
.030 +
Btu)
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
Number
of Boilers
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
mrt-f1red Boilers
Mean BACT Rate
-------
TABLE 4-19. MEAN SULFUR DIOXIDE BACT EMISSION RATES FOR UTILITY BOILERS SEGREGATED 8V FUEL TYPE, BORER SIZE AND EPA REGION
REGION I
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION II
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION III
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IY
<2SO MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
<250 MM Btg/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
NATIONWIDE
<250 MM Btu/hr
>2SO MM Btu/hr
Total
Number
of Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
5
5
0
2
2
0
8
8
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
21
21
Mean BACT
(Ib/MM
.626
.626
.754
.754
.643
.643
.590
.590
.600
.600
.220
.220
.566
.566
ft
0
0
0
0
0
0
+
+
f)
+
i
0
>
>
n
+
+
0
+
+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
+ ,
+ .
0
+ .
+ ,
Rate
Btu)
.000
.000
.356
.356
.060
.060
.141
.141
.000
.000
,000
,000
.258
,258
Numoer Mean BACT Rate
of Boilers (Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.400 t .000
.400 + .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.400 + .000
.400 ± .000
Wood- fired Boilers
Number
of Boilers
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Mean BACT Rate
(Ib/MM Btu)
0
.033 + .000
.033 i .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.033 + .000
.033 ± .000
Oil-fired Bo11ers_. _
Number
of Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
(Ib/MM
0
0
0
0
0
.500 +
0
.500 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.500 i
0
.500 *
Btu)
.000
.000
.000
.000
DB 81-84
63
-------
TABLE 4-20. MEAN NITROGEN OXIDE BACT EMISSION RATES FOR UTILITY BOILERS SEGREGATED BY FUEL TYPE, BOILER SIZE AND EPA REGION
REGION I
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION II
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 >Vl Btu/hr
Total
REGION III
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IV
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION V
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VI
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VII
<250 MM' Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION VIII
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION IX
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
REGION X
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
NATIONWIDE
<250 MM Btu/hr
>250 MM Btu/hr
Total
Coal-fire
Nuober of
Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
5
5
0
2
2
0
a
8
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
21
21
Coal /Wood-f 1 red Boll ers
BACT Rate
(Ib/MM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.600 +
.600 ±
0
.600 +
.600 +
0
.550 +
.550 i
0
.550 +
.550 ±
0
.500 +
.500 *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.600 +
.600 ±
0
.571 t
.571 i
Btu)
.000
.000
.000
.000
.071
.071
.053
.053
.000
.000
.000
.000
.046
.046
Number of
Boilers
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Mean
BACT Rata
(Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
.600 + .000
.600 + .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.600 + .000
.600 ± .000
Wood-f 1 red
Number of
Boilers
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Boilers
Mean
BACT Rate
(Ib/MM Btu)
0
.080 + .000
.080 ± .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.080 + .000
.080 * .000
Oil-fired
Number of
Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
q
i
0
i
Boilers
Mean
BACT Rate
(lb/l»1 Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.160 + .000
0
.160 i .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.160 * .000
0
.160 i .000
Gas-f 1 red
Number of
Boilers
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
5
Boilers
Mean
EACT Rate
(Ib/KM Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.230 * .000
0
.230 ± .000
.200 i .000
0
.200 ± .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.200 + .000
0
.200 i .000
DB 81-84
64
-------
The tables for industrial and utility boilers are further subdivided by
size (MM Btu/hr) and, for the most part, are self-explanatory. To enable
the reader to put the average BACT values into perspective, the numbers of
BACT decisions involved in each value are also presented.
4.4 CONTROL TECHNOLOGY ALTERNATIVES
An integral part of preparing a PSD permit application is the BACT
analysis. In theory, this involves performing analyses of cost, and
environmental and energy impacts of emission control alternatives that are
candidates for BACT. Presumably, the results of this exercise lead to the
conclusion that defines BACT. One exception to this is where the source
applies the emission controls that are deemed the most stringent available.
In these cases, analysis of control technology alternatives is generally
required of PSD permit applicants. In some cases, the cognizant permitting
agency performs independent analyses. Presumably, these analyses are used
by the agencies as a framework for BACT decisions.
In the course of data gathering for the new NSR data base, control
technology alternatives (where available) analyzed by either the applicant
or the permitting agency were recorded and coded. Furthermore, cost
effectiveness data (where available) as presented in the permit files were
also recorded and coded.
Tables 4-21 through 4-25 show for each emission unit where control
technology alternatives analyses were available, the specific alternative
controls and associated incremental cost effectiveness (ICE) of the
alternatives. Also shown is the BACT controls as required by the PSD permit
which was, in most cases, the baseline against which the ICE of control
alternatives was calculated. For instance, the PM BACT for emission unit
No. 18 shown in Table 4-21 was determined to be a 99.15 percent efficient
ESP. One control alternative was analyzed, a baghouse, and the ICE of the
baghouse over the ESP was calculated to be $100/ton of additional PM removed
by the baghouse.
65
-------
TABLE 4-21.
PARTICULATE MATTER BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED
EMISSION UNIT
BACT
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE I
ICE
TECHNOLOGY (t/TON)
TECHNOLOGY
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE Z
ICE
(t/TON)
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
ICE
TECHNOLOGY ($/TON)
CTi
CT>
1. STEEL PLANT/ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE
2. STEEL PLANT/ELECTRIC ARC FURMACE
3". STEEL PLANT/REHEAT FURNACE
4. KRAFT PULP MILL/RECOVERY FURNACE
S. KRAFT PULP MILL/RECOVERY FURNACE
6. KRAFT PULP HILL /RECOVERY FURNACE
7. KRAFT PULP HILL/RECOVERY FURNACE
*. KRAFT PULP HILL/RECOVERY FURNACE
9. KRAFT PULP MILL/RECOVERY FURNACE
10., KRAFT PULP MILL/LIHE KILN
tl. O.ASS MANUFACTURING PLANT/GLASS MELTING FURNACE
12. GLASS MANUFACTURING PLANT/GLASS ICLTING FURNACE
13. IMXJSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
U. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
IS. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
16. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
17. INDUSTRIAL' BOILER/COAL -FIRED
IB. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
19. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
20. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
21. IICUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
22. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
23. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
24. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
25. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
26. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
27. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
n. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
29. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
30. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
31. INDUSTRIAL BOILEfl/MOOD-FIRED
32. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/HOOD-FIRED
33. IMXISTRIAL EO1LER/WOOO-F1RED
34. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/BAGASSE-FIRED
35. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COALi HOOD-FIRED
36. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
37. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. WOOD-FIRED
38. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
39. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
40. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
41. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIQUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
42. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIOUID, SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
43. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIOUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
44. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIOJUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
45. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIOUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
46. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIOUID, SOLID COBINATION FUEL
47. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIOUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
48. IMXISTRIAL BOILER/LIQUID, SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
49. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS. OIL-FIRED
50. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/SOLID. GAS COMBINATION FUEL
SI. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/MATERIAL HANDLING
12. rLUIDIZED BED COM8USTIOH/WOOD-FIREO
SI. MfTE HEAT BOILER/OIL-FIRED
J4. BATTE HEAT BOILER/OIL-FIRED
SJ. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIQUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
M. VTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
".65X BAGHOUSE
9".65% BAGHOUSE
FABRIC FILTER
EST (99.BX EFT )
ESP
ESP
99.SX ESP
99. 5X tSP
99.5X ESP
VtNTURI SCRUBBER
PROCESS. HARHUARE HOP
PROCESS, HARI'UARD HOD.
99. 7X BAGHOUSE
99.7X BAGHOUSE
E ST-
EEP
ESP
99.1SX ESP
HULTICLONES
HULTICLONES
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
CVCLONE/BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHDUSE
BAGHOUSE
99tX CYCLONE,FF
994X CYCLONE.FF
ESP
COMBUSTION CONTROL SYSTEMS
CYCLONE/ESP
CYCLONE/ESP
99.55X MUL1ICYCLONE
IMPINGEMENT SCRUBBER
ESP
VENTURI SCRUBBER
MECHANICAL COLLECTOR I ESP
99% ESP CYCLONfS
99X ESP CYCLONES
99X ESP CYCLOHES
VENTURI SCRUBBER
IMPINGEMENT SCRUBBER
MECH. COLLECTOR/ESP
99.5X ESP
VENTURI SCRUBBER
MULTICLDNE
MULTICLONE
99.9H BAGFILTER
VENTURI/CYCLONE
98.7X MULTICYCLDNE/VENTURI
BAGHOUSE UET SUPPRESSION
MULTICYCLONE/ELECTROSCRUBBER
GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE
GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE
IMPINGEMENT SCRUBBER
COL PS IDE ESP
VENTURI SCRUBBER
VEN1UR1 SCRUBBER
ESP
BAGHOUSES
MECHANICAL COLLECTOR
ESF
SCRUBBER
'SCRUBBER
SricUBBCR
ESP
ESP 0.00
ESP 0.00
ESP
ESP
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHQUSE 100.00
SIBESTREAM BAGHOUSE 326.72
SIDESTREAM BAGHOUSE 338.72
ESP
SCRUBBER 0.00
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
BAGHOUSE 0.00
FUEL TREATMENT
UCT SCRUBBER 0.00
SCRUBBER 0.00
ESP
MULTICLONE SCRUBBER
BAGHOUSE 0.00
ESP
MET SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
ESP
BAGHOUSE
SCRUBBER
VENTURI SCRUBBER
ESP
ESP '6933.00
ESP 6933.00
VET SCRUBBERS
BAGHOUSE
FABRIC FILTER
DUST SUPPRESSION SPR
VEN1URISCRUBBER
ESP 7511.00
ESP 7511.00
MULTICLONESCRUBRER
FABRIC FILTER
ESP
ESP
VENTURI SCRUBBER
SCRUBBERS
BUGHOUSE
0 0.00
BAGHOUSE
BAGHUUSE
BAGHOUSE
0 0.00
HIGH TEMP BAGHOUSE 0.00
HIGH 1EMP. BAGHOUSE 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
FULL BUGHOUSE 2054.08
FULL BUGHOUSE 2034.08
UET SCRUBBER
ESP 0.00
SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
VENTURI SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
HIGHER EFFICIENCY ES 0.00
FLUE OAS CLEANING
BAOHOUSE 0.00
BAGHOUSE 0.00
UET SCRUBBER
VENTURI SCRUBBER
0 0.00
0 0.00
FABRIC FILTER
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
0 0.00
MULT I CLONE SCRUBBER
BAGHOUSE
FABRIC FILTER
DRY SCRUBBER
VENTURI SCRUBBER 7006.00
VENTURI SCRUBBER 7006.00
ESPS
ESP
ESP
0 0.00
ELECTROSCRUBBER U/0
0 0.00
0 0.00
BAOHOUSE
0 O.OO
0
0
0
0
UET SCRUBBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FABRIC FILTER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BAOHOUSE
BAOHOUSE
IAOHOUSE
CYCLONES
0
DRY SCRUBBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4810
4810
-------
TABLE 4-21. PARTICULATE MATTER BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
cr>
un i r\ i wn urij.oj.LWM
EMISSION UNIT
M. utUltY BolLER/coAL-FIREO
58. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
59. UTIIITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
60. UTIIITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
61. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
62. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
63. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
64. UTILITY DOILER/COAL -FIRED
65. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
66. UTIIITY B01LER/COAL-FIREO
67. UTIIITY BOILER/COAL-FIRED
68. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
69. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
70. UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
11. UTILITY BOILER/MOOD-FIREO
72. UTILITY BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
73. SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR
74. SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR
75. SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR
76. SOLID BASTE INCINERATOR
77. SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR
78. SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR
79. SOLID HASTE INCINERATOR
80. PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT/Xlltl
81. PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT/KILN
82. PORTLAND CEMOT PLANT/CLINKER COOLER
83. PORTLAND CEICNT PLANT/FINISH KILL SYSTEM
84. PORTLAND CE1CPT PLANT/FINISH MILL SYSTEM
85. PORTLAND COSHT PLANT/RAH MATERIAL STORAGE
86. PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT/RAN MATERIAL STORAGE
87. PORTLAND CEICNT PLANT/RAW MATERIAL STORAGE
88. PORTLAND CE»CNT PLANT/QUARRY FACILITIES
89. STATIONARY INTERNAL COffiUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
90. STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
91. STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
92. STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
93. STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
94. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
95. STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
98. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
97. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
98. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
99. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
100. STATIONARY INTERNAL CO BUST I ON DIESEL ENGINE
101. STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
102. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
103. STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
104. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
IDS. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
108. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
107. PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT/RAM MATERIAL STORAGE
IM. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/OIL. GAS-FIRED
10*. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/OIL. GAS-FINED
110. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/OIL. GAS-FIRED
111. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR
112. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR
UINX 1 *J 1 V/l\ »1IIA^>
BACT
TDLl'SIPE ESP
"9.74X ESf
ESP
ESP
ESP
99X BAGHOUSE
991 BAGHOUSE
117. PAGHPUSE
99% HAl. HOUSE
E ST-
EEP
FSP OR BAGHOUSE
ESP OR BAGHOUSE
COLD SIPE ESF-
99. 5X ESP
ESP
ESF
ESP
99. SX ESF
99. SX CSF-
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHDUSE
BAGHOUSE-. OlGR/ftCF
99. BX FABRIC FILTER
BAGHOUSE
99 ,8X BAGHOUSE
99.81 BAGHOUSE
99. BX BAGHOUSE
99, 8X BAGHOUSE
99, BX BAGHOUSE
UET SUPPRESSION
TURBOCHARGING
1URBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
H'RBOCHAKGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGINO
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
TURBOCHARGING
COMBUST EXHAUST GAS.
COMBUST EXHAUST GAS.
99. BX BAGHOUSE
EFFICIENT COHBUSTION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
V3X ESP
>>. ESP
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE t COMTR01 ALTERNATIVE Z
ICE ICE
TECHNOLOGY (t/TON) TECHNOLOGY (t/TON)
FAHKIC F ILIER
MET SCRUBBER
ESP U/FLUE GAS EONP.
ESf U/FLUE GAS CONP.
HI EFF CSP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
BAGHOUSE
HIGH EFF ESP
VCNTURI
VENTURI
75X OF NSPS
FABRIC FILTER
LOU ASH FUEL
MORE EFF. ESP
MORE EFF. ESP
HECHAN1CAL COLLECTOR
MECHANICAL COLLECTOR
tSP
ESP
ESP
ESP
LOU EFF. SCRUBBERS
LOU EFF. SCRUBBER
CYCLONE SCRUBBER
CYCLONE SCRUBBER
CYCLONE SCRUBBER
CTCLONE SCRUBBER
CYCLONE SCRUBBER
ENCLOSURES
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAOHOUSE
ESP
ESP
CYCLONE SCRUBBER
DAS ONLY
DAS ONLY
OAS ONLY
BAOHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
. FABRIC FILTER
0 BAGHOUSE
0 BAGHOUSE
. BAGHOUSE
. 0
. 0
0
. 0
0
1368 BAGHOUSE
0 HOT ESP
0 HOT ESP
, SOX OF NSPS
. 0
0
VENTURI SCRUBBER
VENTURI SLRUBBER
. FABRIC FILTERS
. FABRIC FILTERS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
. HIGH EFF
. HIGH EFF
. VENTURI
VENTURI
. VENTURI
. VENTURI
. VEKIURI
350000 0
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESF
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
. ESP
7511 0
7511 0
. VENTURI
. 0
. 0
. 0
. SCRUBBERS
. SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
2500
O
0
'
Q
Q
0
386 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
»
0
.
.
.
.
*
1
.
.
0
0
.
0
0
0
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
ICE
TECHNOLOGY ($/TON)
0
rt
Q
o
0
J)
0
0
COLD ESP WITH CONDIT
COLD ESP UITH COHPIT
25X OF NSPS
Q
0
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
UET SCRUBBERS
UET SCRUBBERS
0
0
0
0
ESP
ESP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. SCRUBBER 0
srPiiBRFi
»
0
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
ft
0
0
Q
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 4-21.
cr>
CO
PARTICULATE MATTER BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Concluded)
113.
114.
US.
US.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
12S.
128.
127.
126.
129.
130.
131.
132.
EMISSION UNIT
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/DRYER
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER
PROCESS SOCHI FUGITIVES
PROCESS SOCHI FUGITIVES
KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
KAOLIN PROCESSING PLAHT/ROTARY KILN
KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/DflYER
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT/KILN
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT/MATERIAL HANDLING
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT/MATERIAL HANDLING
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLAHT/DRYER
CHEMICAL PROCESS PlAHT/DflYER
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLAKT/ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE
WOOD PRODUCTS MAIUFACTURING/ORYER'
HOOD PRODUCTS MAIIUFACTURING/DRYER
BACT
CYCLONIC UET SCRUBBER
V?X VENTURI SCRUBBER
?9X VENTURI SCRUBBER
V9Z VENTURI SCRUBBER
<*?* VENTURI SCRUBBER
SINTERED METAL FILTER BAGHOUSE
SINTERED METAL FILTER BftGHOUSE
MFCH. COLLECTOR
MECH. COLLECTOR
V4X EFF. UET SCRUBBER
UET WASHER SCRUBBER
NONE
MECH. COLLEC. AFTER BURNER 4
HAOHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
VENTURI/CYCLONE
VENTURI/CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
HIGH IFFICIENCY CYCLONES
Mir.H EFFICIENCr CYCLONFS
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
TECHNOLOGY (J/TON) TECHNOLOGY
FABRIC FILTERS
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
FABRIC FILTER 0
FABRIC FILTER 0
ESF
ESP .
VENTURI SCRUBBER
VENTURI SCRUBBER
COLLECTORS .
UET SCRUBBER
ESF 0
ESF 0
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
ESF 0
FABRIC FILTER
FABRIC FILTER
VCNTURI SCRUBBER
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
0
0
IMPINGE SCRUBBER
IMPINGE SCRUBBER
0
0
0
PRY SCRUBBER
IONIZING UET SCRUBBE
IONIZING UET SCRUBBE
ESP
ESP
IONIZING UET SCRUBBE
ESF
ESF
2 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
(I/TON) TECHNOLOGY WTO*)
-
t
0
0
(
0
0
0
0
0
t
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESP
VENTURI SCRUBBER
VENTURI SCRUBBER
0
0
VENTURI SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-22. SULFUR DIOXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED
CTi
I.
7.
J.
4.
s.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
IS.
16.
17.
It.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
M.
27.
78.
79.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
<1.
47.
43.
44.
45.
40.
47.
4*.
4f.
SO.
51.
St.
SI.
M.
ss.
5ft.
EMISSION UNIT
STEEL PLANT/REHEAT FURNACE
KRAFT PULP MILL/RECOVERY FURNACE
KRAFT PULP HILL/RECOVERT FURNACE
KRAFT PULP MILL/RECOVERY FURNACE
GLASS MANUFACTURING PLANT/GLASS MELTING FURNACE
GLASS MANUFACTURING PLAMT/GLASS ICLTING FURNACE
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -f IRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL OOHER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL -FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/VOOO-FIRCO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/BAGASSC-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. HOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
IIOUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL, WOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. WOOO-FIRFD
BACT
1 OU S FUELS
NONE
0
COMBUSTION CONTROL
IOU SULFUR OIL
LOU SULFUR OIL
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SUtFUR COOL
LOU S COAL
BOX PRY FGD
LOU S COAL
1 OU S COAL
PRY FDD
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU S TOAL
LOU S COAL
IOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR COAL
FULFUR CONTENT LIMIT
LOU S FUEL
PSX [iRY SCRUBBER
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU S UASHED COAL
LOU S UASHEt" COAL
LOU S COAL/85X PRY FOP
LOU (0.7AX) SULFUR COAL
92. 5X CITRATE FGIi
1 OU SULFUR COAL
IOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR COftL
LOU SUIFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR COAL
1 OU SULFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR COAL
IOU SULFUR COAL
1 OU SULFUR COAL
WET SCRUBBER
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SUIFUR COAL
LOU S COAL
0
LOU SULFUR COAL
LOU SULFUR FUEL
2 X S TUEL
2 X S FUEL
2.3X S IN FUEL
IOU SULFUR FUEL
1 IHIT OIL 5 1 QUANTITY
LOU SULFUR FUEL
LOU 8 FUELS
85X DRY FDD
.7X S COAL/83X DRY FGD
LOU S COAL
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
TECHNOLOGY
LOUER S FUEL OIL
FOP
NON-REG FOB
FGD
.3X S OIL-NO 2
.3X S OIL-NO 2
FGD-tiUAL f.LKALI
FGP
SPRAY PRY SCRUBBING
COOL CLEANING
FGP
FGP
UET SCRUBBER
FGP
FGP
UET FGP
UET FGP
FGP
FGP
FGP
COMPLIANCE COAL
PRY SCRUBBING
UET SCRUBBER
LIMESTONE FCiD
LIMESTONE FGP
HIGH S COALtFOP
HIGH S COAL.FGP
ULT SCRUBBER
LOU ( .4X1 S COAL
LIMESTONE FGP
HIGH S COAL/SCRUBBER
LOUER S COAL
LOUER S COAL
COAL CLEANING
COAI. CLEANING
PUAL ALKALI FDD
DUAL ALKALI FGP
PUAL ALKALI FOP
PUAL ALKALI FGP
HIGHER EFFICIENCY ES
3IX FGP
3IX FOP
UET SCRUBBER
COMPLIANCE COAL
FLUIPIZED BEP BOILER
FGP
FLUE OAS PESULFURIZA
FLUE OAS PESULFURIZA
FUEL TREATMENT
FDD
FOP
FGD
FDD
UET FDD
UET SLRUBBER
FDP
1
ICE
(t/TON)
3000
7500
700
0
0
5300
5300
,
0
.
.
,
2390
2390
.
,
0
0
,
277
.
.
,
.
0
470
0
,
.
.
.
3030
3050
3050
3050
0
57S
575
.
2733
.
,
.
,
0
f
t
f
0
0
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
TECHNOLOGY
0
0
REG FGD
0
1 .51 5 OIL-NO. «
1 .5* S OIL-NO t
0
0
LOUER S COAL (O.B5X)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
COAL CLEANING
HI (1 .11)5 COAL U/f GP
UELLMAN LORP FOP
DRY LIME SCRUBBER
HIGHER S COAL U/FOD
HIGHER S COAL U/FGP
FGD
FGD
PRY FOD
PRY FGP
PRY FGP
PRY FGP
DRY SCRUBBER
47X FGP
1/X FGD
DRY 5CRUB(ER
LOUER S CUAL
UET FGD
0
0
0
FLUE OAS DE6ULFUR1ZA
0
0
0
UET SCRUBBER
0
0
0
2
ICE
(t/TON)
0
0
9000
0
0
0
0
0
CONTROL
TECHNOLOGY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ALTERNATIVE 3
ICE
(I/TON)
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
I.4X S COAL (EXIST)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
730
0
472
,
.
.
3800
3800
3800
3800
0
4.13
413
.
2850
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
421 FGP
A2X FGD
VASHED COAL
FOD UITH HI S
DRY FGD
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
341
341
.
COAL 3463
.
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 4-22. SULFUR DIOXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Continued)
ST.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
11.
72.
73.
7«.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
62.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
9S.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
IM.
1M.
187.
108.
10*.
110.
111.
117.
EMISSION UNIT
'INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. HOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. HOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BORER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL, MOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIQUID, SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIQUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LICUIO, SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
IMXJSTRIAL BORER/LIQUID. SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS. OIL-FIRED
IMX1STOIAL DOILER/GAS. OIL-FIREO
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS, OIL-FIREO
IMXJSTRIAL BOILER/GAS, 0!L-FIR£0
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS. OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS. OIL-FIRED
FLUID I ZED BED COMBUST ION/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIQUID, SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIFED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL -FIRED
UTILITY BOILER/COAL. MOOD-FIRED
SOLID MASTE INCINERATOR
SOLID MASTE INCINERATOR
SOLID MASTE INCINERATOR
SOLID MASTE INCINERATOR
SOLID MASTE INCINERATOR
SOLID MASTE INCINERATOR
SOLID MASTE INCINERATOR
PORTLAND CEMENT FTANT/KILM
PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT/KILN
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL CWSUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COWJSTIOH DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COHJSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
STATIONARY INTERNAL COCUSTION DIESEL
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGIIC
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
BACT
LOU 5 COAt/UOOP TRS IWCIN.
LOW S COAl/UOOP TRS INflN
1 OU S COAL/UOOIi TRS INLIN
COAL MIXED Ul [H BARK
1 OU S COAL
OIL (31 S)
BURN 1 ,7X S COAL
BURN 1 ,71 S COAL
I OW S COAL
LOU E FUEL OIL OR NAT. OAS
1 OU S FUEL OIL OR NA1, GAS
LOU S FUEL OIL OR NAT. GAS
LIMIT FUEL 10 .5* SULFUR
LOU S FUEL
LOU S FUEL
LINESTONE ADDITION
1 OU S FUEL
UE1 FGI" (?OX REMOVAL)
FGIi (90X REMOVAL 1
?
LOU S FUEL (0.5 X S)
LOU S FUEL (0.5 X S)
LOU S FUEL (O.S X S)
LOU S FUEL (O.S S)
LOU S FUEL (0.5 X S)
LOU S FUEL (0.5 X S)
LOU S FUEL (0.5 * S)
LOW S FUEL (O.S X SI
LDU S FUEL (O.SX S)
LOU S FUEL (0.5Z S)
LOU S FUEL (O.SZ S)
LOU S FUEL (O.SX S)
LOU S FUEL (O.SZ S)
LOU SULFUR OIL
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE i CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 2 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
ICE ICE ICE
TECHNOLOGY (J/TOH) TECHNOLOGY (I/TON) TECHNOLOGY ($/TOtl)
FGH 534 0 0
FGII 53* 0 0
FGU 534 0 0
FGU 3334 0 0
LOWER S COAL . COAL CLEANING
3. I5Z SOIL . 0 0
BURN 1.25Z S COAL 319 BURN 12 F OIL 5541
BURN I.27Z S COAL 21? BURN «2 F. OIL 5541
HI S COAL U/FDD . LO S COAL U/FGD 1034
FGD .0 0
FGIi
FOP
ALTERNATE FUELS
0 0
0 0
0 0
FGD 10400 0 0
FGD 10400 0 0
FGD 00 n
FGU
LINE SCRUBBER
LIME SCRUBBER
LIME FDD
0 0
UASHED COAL .
WASHED COAL
DUAL ALKALI FOP
DRY SCRUBBING 00 0
DRY SCRUBBING 00 0
DRY FGD
DRY FOD
DRY FGD
PRY FGP
HIGH EFF UET SCRURBE 12
?OI FOD 1452
VOX FOP I4S2
?OX FOP 1452
101 FGD 1452
DRY FOIi 232
?OZ PRY FOD 754 H3Z WIT FOII 0
75Z OF NSF'S
LOU S COAL
MET SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
VET SCRUBBER
UET SCRUBBER
50Z OF NSPS
0 0
DRY SCRUBBER
PRY SCRUBBER
PRY SCRUBBER
PRY SLKUBBER
UET SCRUBBER 00 0
WET SCRUBBER 00 0
WET SCRUBBER 00 0
FGD 00 0
SODIUM THROUAUP.Y E 1030 LIMESTONE FOU 1117
FGD
FGP
FGP
FGD
FGD
fan
FGD
FGD
FGD
FGD
FGP
FGD
FGP
FGD
FOP
FGD
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2.0 X S 1184 7.5 X S 1184
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
FGD (1 .51 S CUAL)
0 0
3X S COAL U/FGP 343
31 S COAL NAOH SCRU 343
VERY LO S COAL 3000
0 »
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
78. S DRY FOD
25Z OF NSPS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DOUBLE ALK FOD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0 X S
0
0
0
0
0
o
Q
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
1 122
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
1184
-------
TABLE 4-22. SULFUR DIOXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Continued)
EMISSION UNIT
BACT
TECHNOLOGY
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1
ICE
($/TON) TECHNOLOGY
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE ?
ICE
(I/TON)
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
TECHNOLOGY
ICE
(J/TM)
113. STATIONARY INTERNAL COWIST10N DIESEL ENGINE
1U. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
US. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
116. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
117. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
lit. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIREO
119. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED
120. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIREO
121. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS, OIL-FIREO
122. SUFURIC ACID PRODUCTION UNIT
in. SULFURIC ACID PRODUCTION UNIT
124. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR
125. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FCOU CATALYST REGENERATOR
126. PETROLEUM REFIHERT/FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR
127. PETROLEUM REF INERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DE»ICE
12«. PETROLEUM REFIKERT/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION D»IC£
l». PETROLEUM REFIieRY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION OE»IC£
130. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
131.' PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
132. PETROLEUM REF)NERY/FUEl GAS COfBUSTION DEVICE
133. PETROLEUM REFINERY/CLAUS SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT
134. PETROLEUM RCF1NERY/CLAUS SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT
135. PETROLEUM REFIHERY/CLAUS SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT
136. PETROLEUH REFINERY/FLARE OR INCINERATOR
137. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
138. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
139. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
140. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
141. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
142. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
143. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
144. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
145. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PIAKT/SULFUR RECOVERY
146. NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/FLARE
147. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PLANT/FLARE
148. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PLAKT/FLARE
149. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PLANT/FLARE
150. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PLANT/FLARE
151. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PLANT/FLARE
152. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PIANT/FLARE
153. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PLANT/FLARE
154. NATURAl GAS PROCESSING PLANT/ACID GAS INCINERATOR
155. PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/DRYER
154. PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PIANT/POTROOM GROUP
157. PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLANT/POTROOM GROUP
158. PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLANT/POTROOM GROUP
15». PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLANT/POTROOH GROUP
160. PRIMARY AlUMINUM REDUCTION PLANT/POTROOM GROUP
161. PRIMARY AlUMINUM REDUCTION PIANT/POTROOM GROUP
162. KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
163. KAOLIN PROCESSING PIAHT/ROTART KILN
164. KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
165. KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
166. CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT/KILN
167. aericAi PROCESS PLAKT/FLARE OR INCINERATOR
168. CARBON BLACK PLANT/FURNACE
USE NATURAL GAS OR LOU SOIL
USE NATURAL OR LIIU SOU
? STAGE SELECTOX
FEKROUS CHLORIDE
ffKROUS CHI OR IDE
LOU 5 FUEL (O.fll 5 OIL)
IPU SULFUR FUEL
LOU SULFUR FUEL
LOU SULEUR FUEL
[UPAL A1T.I1H I ION
DUAL APSORF 1 ION
SULFUR REDUCTION CATALYST
LflU SULFUR OIL
IOU SULFUR OIL
LOU S OIL
LOU S OIL
LOU S OIL
LOU S (III
LOU S OIL
LOU S OIL
92. >* CITRATE SCRUB
9(-V. CLAUS FLANT
fl AUS F'LANT
NONE
3 STAGE CLAUSIINCINERATOR
scot
< '. TAGE CLAUS U/CBA TBT
/ TTAGE CLAUS U/CBA TGI
f I ftHE
FLARED
2-r.IAGE CLAUS (93.51)
' .'».B6%) 3-STAGE CLAUS-SCOT
'9.B6Z) 3-STAGE CLAUS/SCOT
I I ARFD
flftRED
(LARCD
NONE
NO CONTROL
2 STAGE SELECTOR
FLARING
NO CONTROL
NONE
IHFINGEHENT SCRUBBER
IIHIT S IN COKE TO 3X
I DM S. COKE < 3X>
!?. S COKE
IX S COKE
3X S COKE
.11 S COKE
LOU S COAL
LOU S COAL
?X SULFUR COAL
?y. SULFUR COAL
LOU S FUEL
H3 S FLARE
EFFICIENT OPERATION
L.S. OIL 1.:X> 9051
LSO 9051
SCLECrOX.'RE^.VON ?6IO
IRON STONGE 67
IRON SF'Or'fif 67
FGD
GAS ONI Y
GAS Pt'LY
SCRUHKER
SCFUFiBIHG SYSTEMS
SCRUBBING SYSTEMS
SCRUBBER 0
IOUER S OIL
LOUER S OIL
FGD
FGtl
FGD
FGD
EGD
FGIl
LIMESTONE FGD 0
CLAUS CBA 4063
SCOT 0
FGD
2 STAGE CLAUS
UELLMAN LORD UNIT
CLAUS/SCOT 4816
CLAUS/SCOT 4816
CLAUS 0
CLAUS S RECOVERY
3-STAGE CLAUS/SCOT U 2302
EXI. CLAUS REflC. 0
FXT. CLAUS REAC. 0
fLAUS S RECOVERY
CLAUS S RECOVERY
FIF'IHG TO CLAUS RECO
SELECTOX 500
3-STAGE CLAUS 127B
(EAVON 2610
SULFUR RECOVERY 0
SCLECTOX
CLAUS S RECOVERY 1870
FGD 0
FGD 1400
EGP o
FGD
FOD
FGD
FGD
UET LIME FOP .
UE1 LIME FOD
2Z S COAL 395
:.21 S COAL 375
FOD
CLAUS
SCRUHPERS
FGD 2971
FGtl 2971
3 STAGE SELECTOX 2020
LOCAI 365
LUCA! 365
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LOUEF, S OIL
LOUER S OIL
LOUER S OIL
LOUER S OIL
LOUER S OIL
LOUER S OIL
ULLLMAN LORD FDD 0
0 0
AMMONIA THIOSNLFATE 0
COMM. SLUDGE D1SF.
0 0
DEAVON UNIT
3-STAGE CLAUS -1823
3-STAGE CLAUS -1823
CHEMSUEET 0
CONSTRUCT PIPELINE
SUBDEUFOINT CONVERSI 2177
3 STAGE CLAUS 0
3 STAGE CLAUS 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LO CAT 453
SELECTOX 687
3-S1AGE SELECTOX 2020
CAUSTIC SCRUBBER 0
CLAUS
a o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
: I .231 S COAL 535
~l .231 S LOAL 355
SELECTOX
0 0
0
0
0
STRETFORD
STRETFORD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SODIUM HYDROXIDE CON
0
0
0
a
0
IRON SPONGE
0
0
BEAVON SYSTEM
BEAVON SYSTEM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CAUSTIC SCRUBBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SCRUBUMO
SCRUBBING
0
0
0
0
0
1000
1000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1711
-1711
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
688
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
71»
719
0
0
-------
TABLE 4-22. SULFUR DIOXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Concluded)
EMISSION UNIT
169.
170.
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
BLACK
BLACK
BLACK
BLACK
BLACK
BLACK
BLACK
BACT
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
ICE
TECHNOLOGY (S/TON) TECHNOLOGY
PLANT/WASTE HEAT BOILER PROPER DESIGN
PLANT/REACTOR
PLANT/REACTOR
PLANT/REACTOR
PLANT/REACTOR
PLANT/DRYER
PLANT/DRYER
EFFICIENT
EFFICIENT
EFFICIENT
EFFICIENT
OPERATION
OPERATION
OPERATION
OPERATION
PROPER COMBUST
PROPER DESIGN 1 0[iER
FGH
SCRUBBERS
SCRUBBERS
SCRUHBEKS
SCRUBBERS
FGD
FGD
FUEL GrtS TESULF
0
0
0
0
FUEL GrtS DESULF.
FUEL GrtS IIESULF
2
ICE
($/TON)
.
0
0
0
0
,
.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-23. NITROGEN OXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED
EMISSION UNIT
BACT
COMTROL ALTERNATIVE 1
TECHNOLOGY
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 2
ICE ICE
($/TON) TECHNOLOGY U/TON) TECHNOLOGY
CONTROL ALTERATIVE 3
fCE
(J/TON)
OJ
1. STEEL PLANT/REHEAT FURNACE
3. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
3. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIHED
4. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COM.-FIR£0
5. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COM.-FIRED
«. INDUSTRIAL BORER/COAL -FIRED
7. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
6. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
9. INDUSTRIAL BOUER/COAL-FIRED
10. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIRED
11. INDUSTRIAL FCILEH/COAL-FIRED
12. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COM.-FIRED
13. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL-FIREO
14. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
IS. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
16. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/OIL-FIRED
17. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS-FIRED
16. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS-^IRED
19. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS-FIREO
20. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. WOOD-FIRED
21. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. HOOD-FIRED
27. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/COAL. ROOD-FIRED
23. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/LIQUID, SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
24. INDUSTRIAL BORER/LIOJID, SOLID COMBINATION FUEL
25. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS, OIL-FIRED
M. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/GAS. OIL-FIRED
27. INDUSTRIAL BOILER/SOLID. GAS COMBINATION FUEL
28. UTILITY BOUER/COAL-FIRED
29. UTILITY BOILER/COAL-FIRED
30. UTILITY BOILER/COAL-FIRED
31. UTILITY BOILER/COAL-FIRED
32. UTILITY BOILER/COAL-FIREO
33. SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR
34. SOLID HASTE INCINERATOR
35. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
3«. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
37. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
36. STATIONARY INTERNAL CO BUS TI ON GAS ENGINE
39. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
40. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
41. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
42. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
43. STATIONARY INTERNAL COBUSTION GAS ENGINE
44. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
45. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
46. STATIONARY IKTERHAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
47. STATIONARY INTERNAL COtOJSTION GAS ENGINE
48. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
49. STATIONARY INTERNAL CCfHJSTION GAS ENGINE
50. STATIONARY IKTERHAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
SI. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
S2. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
II. fTATIOHARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
M. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
IS. STATIONARY INTERNAL COmjSTIOH GAS ENGINE
56. STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
I I A CONTROL
COMBUSTION CONTROL
COMBUSTION CONIF-OU
COMBUSTION CONIROL
rOHI'USl ION CONIROL
( ONI'USI ION CONTROL
COMBUSTION CONTROL
MOBlftN liOIlER DESIGN
COHBIISIION OF1IHIZATION
COMBUSTION CONTROL
COMBUSTION CONTROL
I (A
LEA
LOU EXCESS AIR
AMMONIA INJECTION
AMMONIA INJECTION
NONE
LOU NOX BURNER
LOU NOX BURNER
COMBUSTION MODIFICATION
liOII ER IifSICN
LOU EXCESS AIR
NON(
NONE
I OU TEMF-. I OU EXCESS AIR
I OU TEMF'i LOU EXCESS AIR
COMBUSTION CONTROL
I 0 IXCESS AIR
KfSHiN ( LEA
(ANGENTIAL BOILER DESIGN
BOILER DESIGN
BOILER [IESIGN
PROPER OPERATIONi DESIGN
F'KOFER OFERATIONi HESIGN
TURKOCHARGERS
TURBOCHAFGERS
AIR-FUEL CHANGES
AIR-FUEL CHANGES
NO CONTROL
NO CONTRO
NO CONTROL
AIR FUEL CHANGES
AIR FUEL CHANGES
AIR FUEL CHANGES
FUEL-AIR MIXTURE
FUEL AIR MIXTURE
FUEL-AIR MIXTURE
FUEL-AIR MIXTURE
FUEL-AIR MIXTURE
FUEL-AIR MIXTURE
USE OF OAS
USE OF OAS
USE OF GAS
USE OF BAS
IGNITION RETARD
IGNITION RETARD
LOU NO BURNER
NOX SCRUBBER
NOX SCRUBBER
NOX SCRUBBER
NOX SCRUBBER
NOX SCRUBBER
NOX SCRUBBER-
FLUE GAS 1REATHENT
f.MMONlA INJECTION
AMMONIA IH.IEC1ION
AMMONIA INJECTION
STAGED COMBUSTION 0
STAGED COMBUSTION 0
FLUE GAS TREATMENT
CATALYTIC CONVERSION 0
CATALYTIC CONVERSION 0
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATI
OFE-STOICH COMBUSTIO 0
OFF-STOICH COHBUSHO 0
TAIL GAS TREATMENT
THERMAL PEMOX 0
AMMONIA INJECTION
FLUE GAS TRT MT.
FLUE GAS TRTMT
LOU NOX BURNER
LOU NOX BURNER
NOX SCRUBBER
LO NOX BURNER
FLUE GAS SCRUBBER
CATALYTIC REDUX
CATALYTIC REDUX 0
CATALYTIC REDUX 0
TAIL OAS TREATMENT
TAIL GAS TREATMENT
LOU NOX ENGINE
LOU NOX ENGINE
EGR 246
EGR 21B
CAT. COMV. U/AMMONIA
CAT, CONV. U/AMHONIA
CAT. CONV. U/AMMONIA
AIR FUEL CHANGES 4V
AIR FUEL CHANGES 19
AIR FUEL CHANGES 19
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
ELECTRIC MOTORS
ELECTRIC MOTORS
ELECTRIC MOTORS
ELECTRIC MOTORS
TURBINES o
TURBINES o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
CATALYTIC OXIDATION
CATALYTIC OXIDATION
CATALYTIC OXIDATION
CATALYTIC OXIDATION
EOR 0
EGR 0
0 0
LEA 0
LEA 0
0 0
LOU EXCESS AIR 0
LOU EXCESS AIR 0
0 0
AMMONIA REDUCTION 0
O'.'ERFIRE AIR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EGR
0 0
0 0
UOP SOX/NOX REDUX 0
UOF- SOX/NOX REDUX 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
CATALYTIC REDUX 29B
CATALYTIC REDUX 298
EGR
EGR
EGR
E.O.R. 248
E.O.R. 218
E.C.R, 218
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TURBINES
TURBINES
TURBINES ,
TURBINES
EOR 0
EGR 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LOU NOX BURNERS 0
LOU NOX BURNERS 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
FGR 0
FGR 0
0 0
COMBUSTION CONTROLS 0
LOU NOX BURNERS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
STAOED COMBUSTION
0 0
0 0
NON-CATALYTIC REDUX 0
NON-CATALYTIC REBUX 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
CATALYTIC REDUX 298
CATALYTIC REDUX 298
CATALYTIC REDUX 298
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
-------
TABLE 4-23. NITROGEN OXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Continued)
EMISSION UNIT
57
58
59
60
61
61
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
108.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COHBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL, COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COinuSTIOM GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL CO-OUST ION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY IKTERMAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
STATIONARY
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COIBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COHBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COIBUSTION .DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COIBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBIIC/GAS-FinED
GAS TURSINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TUREINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
ENGINE
BACT
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
TECHNOLOGY (J/TON) TECHNOLOGY ($/TON) TECHNOLOGY ($/TON)
IGNITION RETARD TURBINES 0 EGR 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
IGNITION RETARD TURBINES 0 EGR 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
IGNITION RETARD TURBINES 0 EGR 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
IGNITION RETARD TURBINES 0 EGR 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
TUNING EGR 0 TURBINES 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
TUNING EGR 0 TURBINES 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 6
TUNING EGR 0 TURBINES 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
TUNING EGR 0 TURBINES 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
TUNING EGR 0 TURBINES 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
TUNING EGR 0 TURBINES 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
TUNING EGR 0. TURBINES 0 ELECTRIC ENGINES 0
CLEAN BURN* RECIP. ELECTRIC MOTORS . TURBINES . DUAL FUEL ENGINES
CLEAN BURN" RECIF. ELECTRIC MOTORS . TURBINES . DUAL FUEL ENGINES
DESIGN CATALYTIC CONVERTER 00 00 0
DESIGN CATALYTIC CONVERTER 00 00 0
DESIGN CATALYTIC CONVERTER 00 00, 0
DESIGN CATALYTIC CONVERTER 00 000
DESIGN CATALYTIC CONVERTER 00 00 0
DESIGN CATALYTIC CONVERTER 00 00 0
NONE CATALYTIC CONV. . UATER INIFTTinW 0 O
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
RETARD INJECTION
IGNITION RETARD
IGNITION RETARD
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
PRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRV CONTROLS
PRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
PRY CONTROLS
PRY CONTROLS
DRY CONTROLS
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CAIALYTIC CONV.
TIMING UATER INJECTION
SCR
SCR
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UAIER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER
UATER
UATER
UATER
UATER
. UftTER
UATER
UATER
WATER
UATER
UATER
UftTER
UftTER
UftTER
UftTER
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
INJECTION
CftTftLYTIC DENITRIFIC
857 0
BS7 0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 4-23. NITROGEN OXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Continued)
EMISSION UNIT BACT
113. STATIONARY GAS TURBIIC/GAS-FIRED MRy CONTROLS
114. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED HRY CONTROLS
115. STATIONARY GAS TURBlHE/GAS-MnEO I'RY CONTROLS
116. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED |,Ry CONTROLS
117. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED [iRr CONTROLS
118. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED [IRT CONTROLS
119. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED WAIER INJECTION
120. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO UAIER INJECTION
121. STATIONARY GAS TUREINE/GAS'-FIRED HK> CONTROI S
122. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO lift CON1ROLS
123. STATIONARY GAS TUR8IME/GAS-FIREO liRr CONTROLS
124. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO PRY CONTROLS
125. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE /GAS-FIRED [iRY CONTROLS
126. STATiaiAKY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED PRY CONTROLS
121. STATIONARY GAS TURBII/GAS-FIREO [iRY CONTROLS
128. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO [IRY CON1ROLS
129. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-F1REO PRY CONTROLS
130. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO PRY CONTROLS
131. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO rf.y CONTROLS
132. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED IIRY CONTROLS
133. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED PRY CONTROLS
134. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO t'RY CONTROLS
135. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO \IRI CONTROLS
136. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED [iRr CONTROI S
137. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO HRY CONTROLS
138. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO I'RT CONTROLS
139. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO t'Rr CONTROLS
140. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO I'M CONlRfll S
141. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO HPY CONTROLS
142. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO PRY CONIROLS
143. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO PR* CONTROLS
144. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED PRY CONTROLS
145. STATIONARY GAS TURPIHE/GAS-FIRED PRY CONTROLS
146. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO I"" CONIROLS
147. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIREO "RY CONIROLS
148. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO I'RY CONTROLS
149. STATIONARY GAS TUR8IHE/GAS-FIREO '"*» CONIROLS
150. STATIONARY GAS TURBI HE/GAS-FIRED I'RT CONTROLS
151. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIREO DRY CONTROLS
152. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO I'RT CONTROLS
153. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIREO [|RT CONIROLS
154. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FlflED t"*r CONTROLS
155. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED »RT CONTROLS
J56. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIRED "Rr CONTROLS
157. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIREO '">' CONTROLS
158. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO "RY CONTROLS
159. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED "Rr CONTROLS
160. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED PR* CONTROLS
161. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED PR* CONTROLS
162. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED |lRr CONTROLS
163. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED PR* CONTROLS
164. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO »*' CONTROLS
165. STATIONARY GAS TUH8IME/GAS-FIRED P*y CONTROLS
166. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED PRT CONTROLS
167. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIREO COMBUSTION CONTROL
168. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED COMBUSTION CONTROL
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1
ICE
TECHNOLOGY (J/TON)
UATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATF.R INJECTION
UAIER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
PRY CONTROLS
PRY CONTROLS
UAIER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WAUR INJECTION
WAItR 1NJEC1ION
WrtlEf: INJECTION
WATER INJECT I ON
WATER INJECIION
WAIER INJCCIION
WAIER INJECMON
WA1LR INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WAIER INJECTION
WAHR INJECTION
UAITR INJECTION
WAIER INJECT IQM
WATfR INJCCIHIH
WAIER INJECIION
WATER INJECTION
WAIER INJECTION
WA1CR INJECTION
WAIER IHJECIIOK
WAIER INJECTION
WAIER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WATER INJECIION
WATER INJECTION
WAIER INJECTION
WAIER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECIION
WATER INJECTION
WAIER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
WAIER INJECTION
WATER INJECIION
WATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,
-------
TABLE 4-23.
NITROGEN OXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Continued)
EMISSION UNIT
(ACT
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
TECHNOLOGY
ICE
(J/TON)
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE Z
TECHNOLOGY
ICE
(I/TON)
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
TECHNOLOGY
(J/TON)
cn
169. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
170. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
171. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
172. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
173. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
174. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
175. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
174. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIFCD
177. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIRED
178. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
179. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
ISO. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
181. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
182. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
183. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
184. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
IBS. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
1M. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
187. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
188. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
189. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
190. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE /GAS-FIRED
191. STATIONARY GAS TURBlNE/GAS-f IRED
192. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
193. STATIONARY GAS .TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
194. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
19$. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
196. STATIONARY GAS TUROINE/GAS-FIRED
197. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
198. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
199. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
200. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
201. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
202. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
203. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
204. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
20$. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
206. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
207. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
208. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIREO
209. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
210. STATIONARY GAS TUREINE/GAS-FIREO
211. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
212. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-F1RED
211. STATIONARY GAS TUREI ME /GAS-FIRED
214. STATIONARY GAS TURBIIC/GAS-FIREO
IIS. fTATTOHAftY BAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
216. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
217. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
218. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
219. STATIONARY GAS TURBIHE/GAS-FIRED
220. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS-FIRED
221. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED
222. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED
223. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED
224. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED
GAS-FIRED TURBINE COMPRESSOR
GAS-TIRED TURBINE COMPRESSOR
PAS-FIRED TURBINE COMPRESSOR
GA'J-I IRED TURBINE COMPRESSOR
GAS-TIRED TURBINE COMPRESSOR
UAIER/STEAM INJ
UAIER/STEAH INJECTION
STCAM INJECTION
STtAM INJECTION
STEAH INJECTION
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DRY CONTROL
DRY CONTROL
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESING
DESIGN
DESIGN
DC SI ON
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
DESIGN
HATER INJECTION
HATER INJECTION
WATER INJECTION
STEAH INJECTION
LOU-NOX IT ENGINE
LOU-HOX 1C ENGINE
LOU-NOX 1C ENGINE
LOU-HOY. 1C ENGINE
LOU-MOX 1C ENGINE
DRV CONTROLS 0
[iRT CONIROLS 0
SELECTIVE CA1ALYTIC
PRY CONTROL
DRV CONTROL .
UATER IN.IEC1ION
UATER INJECTION
UA1ER INJECTION
UATER INJECTION 0
UATER INJECTION 0
DRV CONTROLS 0
DRY CONIROLS 0
DRY CONIROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
[IRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONIROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONIROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRV CONTROLS 0
DRY CONIROLS 0
DRY CONIROLS 0
DRY CON I POLS 0
DRV CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONIROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRV CONTROLS 0
DRV CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
DRY CONTROLS 0
STEAM INJECTION
STEAM INJECTION
STEAM INJECTION
DRY CONTROLS
1C ENGINE
1C ENGINE
1C ENGINE .
1C ENGINE
1C ENGINE
2-STAGE COMBUSTION 0
2 - STAGE COMBUSTION 0
CATALYTIC CONBUSTIC
INCR. SIEAH INJECT
INCR. STEAM INJEC
CATALYTIC CONVERTERS
CATALYMt CONVERTERS
CATALYTIC CONVERTERS
I.C. ENGINES 0
I.C. ENUINES 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
IOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL. 0
LOU N FUEL 0
LOU N FUEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
CATALYTIC TREATMENT 0
CATALYTIC TREATMENT 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER IfiJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UA1ER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
SIEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ, 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
STEAH/UATER INJ. 0
STEAM/UATER INJ. 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-------
TABLE 4-23.
NITROGEN OXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Continued)
EMISSION UNIT BACT
225. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED UATER OR STEAM INJECTION
226. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED UA1ER OR STEAM INJ.
227. STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED .33 UATER/FUEL INJECTION
22S. LI»C MANUFACTURING PLANT/KILN F'FOFER OPERATION
229. PETROLEUM REFIHERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE o
230. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE o
231. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
232. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NDX BURNER
233. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
234. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
235. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
236. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS MMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
237. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
238. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
239. PETROLEUM REF INERT/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
240. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 PU NOX BURNER
241. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
242. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
243. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
244. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
24S. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
246. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
247. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
248. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
249. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
250. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
251. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
2S2. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE > OU NOX BURNER
253. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
2S4., PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNLR
255. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE I «u NOX BURNER
256. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
257. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE I OU NDX BURNER
258. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
259. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
260. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
261. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
262. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
263. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
264. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE 1 OU NOX BURNER
265. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
206. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
267. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU "OX BURNER
268. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
264. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
270. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE Loy MOX "URNER
271. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COHBUSTION DEVICE L0g N°x BURNER
272. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
273. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE Lou H0* BURNER
274. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOW NDX BURNER
27S. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU HOX BURNER
276. PETROLEUM REFIMERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU HOX BURNER
277. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU NOX BURNER
278. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU MOX BURNER
Tit. PETROLEUM REFIHERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE Log N0* BURNER
280. PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE LOU H0)< »URNER
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
ICE
TECHNOLOGY (J/TON) TECHNOLOGY
DR» CONTROL
PRY CONTROL
60 F'F'M NOX
COMBUST ION CONTROLS
LOU-NOX BURNER
LOU-NOX BURNER
FOR
FOR
FGR
FCR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FOR
FGFi
FGF:
FGR
FGR
FGR
FOR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FOR
FOR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FGFi
FGR
FGR
FOR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FGR
FGF:
FGR
FOR
FGR
FOR
FOR
FGR
FGR
FOR
FGR
FOR
FOR
FOR
FGR
FOR
FGR
FOR
.
2654
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
15 rF'M NOX
STACK GAS TREATMENT
0
0
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LErt
LEA
LEA
LEA
LLA
LEA
Lift
LErt
LEA
LEA
LLA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
Lin
LLA
LLA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LErt
LEA
LLA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
2 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
ICE ICE
(t/TON) TECHNOLOGY (t/TON)
155B
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30 FFH NOX
0
0
0
STAGED COMB
STAOED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COHb
STAGED COHB
STAOED COHB
STAGED COHB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAOED COHB
STAGED CUMB
STAGED CUMB
STAGED COHB
STAOED COMB
STAGED COHB
STAGED COMB
STAOED COHB
STAGED COHB
STAOED COHB
SIAOED COHB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
S 1 AGE D COMB
STAGED COHB
STAGED COMB
SIAGED COMB
SIAOED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAGED COMB
STAOED COHB
STAOED COMB
STAOED COHB
STAOED COMB
STAOED COHB
STAGED COHB
STAOED COHB
STAOED COHB
STAOEP COHB
STAOED COHB
STAOED COHB
STAGED COHB
STAOED COMB
BTAOED CUMB
STAOED COMB
STAGED COMB
0
0
1300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
Q
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 4-23.
NITROGEN OXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED (Concluded)
00
281.
282.
283.
284.
28S.
286.
287.
288.
289.
290.
291.
292.
293.
294.
29$.
296.
297.
298.
299.
300.
301.
EMISSION UNIT
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEUCE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUST I OH DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFIMERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL OAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFIMERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICE
NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANT/SULFUR RECOVERY
KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
KAOLIN PROCESSING PLANT/ROTARY KILN
BACT
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 2
TECHNOLOGY (J/TON) TECHNOLOGY (t/TON)
LOU NOX BURNER FOR 0 LEA 0
LOU NOX BURNER FOR 0 LEA 0
LOU NOX BURNER TOR 0 LEfl 0
1 OU NOX BURNER FOR 0 LEft 0
LOU NOX BURNER FUR 0 IEA 0
LOU NOX BURNER FGR 0 LEA 0
LOU NOX BURNER FGR 0 LEA 0
LOU NOX BURNER FOR 0 LEA 0
LOU NOX BURNER FDR 0 LEA 0
LOU NOX BURNER FGR 0 LEft 0
LOU NOX BURNERS t EMISSION LINIT CATALYTIC REDUCTION CATftLYTIL COMBUSTION
LEA LOU NOX BURNER 0 0
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
LEA
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
LOU
LOU
LOU
LOU
LOU
UET
UET
SFEC
SfEC
NOX BURNER
NOX BURNER
NOX BURNER
NOX BURNER
NOX BURNER
INJECTION
INJECTION
. BURNER
. BURNER
0
0
0
0
0
PRY SCRUBBER
BRY SCRUBBER
0
0
- o
0
0
0
0
0
0
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 3
ICt
TEOWOtOGY ($/«*)
STAGED COHB 0
STAGED COMB 0
STAGED CON* 0
STAGED CONB 0
STAGED COMB 0
STAGED CONI 0
STAGED COMB 0
STAGED COM* 0
STAGED CON* 0
STAGED CONB 0
TOIL GAS CONTROL
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-24.
CARBON MONOXIDE BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE)
DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
17.
13.
14.
IS.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
EMISSION UNIT
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL CONBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY IHTERtlAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COSUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COffiUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL ENGINE
STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED
STATIONARY GAS TURBINE/GAS. OIL-FIRED
LIHE MANUFACTURING PLANT/KILN
PETROLEUM REFINERY/FLARE OR INCINERATOR
IRON AND STEEL PLANTS/CUPOLA FURNITURE
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLAKT/CALCINER
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER
PRIMARY COPPER SMELTER/VERTICAL SHAFT FURNACE
PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLAHT/POTROOM GROUP
BACT
NONE
EFI ICIENT COMBUSTION
fFFICIENT COMBUSTION
1 Fl ICIENT COMBUST ION
EF( ICIFN1 COMBUST ION
CFI 1CIENI COMBUST ION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
EFFICIENT CDMBUSIION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
EFI ICIENT COMBUSTION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
EFFICIENI COMBUS1ION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
EFI ICIENI COMBUSTION
EFFICIENT COMBUSTION
tOMBUSTOR DESIGN
COMBUSIOR DESIGN
1 KOPER OPERATION
CATALYTIC I NC I NERA 1 I ON
98. 7X INCINERATION
LALCINIR DESIGN
CALCINER DESIGN
CALCINER DESIGN
CALCINER DESIGN
LIMIT OPACITY
PROPER OFCKAIION
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1
TECHNOLOGY )«,,
CATALYTIC 1NCINERATI
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONU.
CATALYMC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
CATALYTIC CONV.
GAS ONLY
BAS ONLY
COMBUSTION CONTROLS
THERMAL INCINERATOR 4534
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
AFTERBURNER
AFTERBURNER
AFTERBURNER
AFTERBURNER
INCINERATION
INCINERAIION 3400
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
TECHNOLOGY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STACK GAS TREATMENT
0
0
INCREASE COHB. TEMP.
INCREASE COMB. TEMP.
INCREASE COHB. TEHP.
INCREASE COMB. TEMP.
0
0
2
ICE
($/TON)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-25.
00
o
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND BACT DECISIONS, CONTROL ALTERNATIVES, AND INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS
(ICE) DATA FOR EMISSION UNITS FOR WHICH AT LEAST ONE CONTROL ALTERNATIVE WAS ANALYZED
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
8.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
17.
13.
14.
IS.
16.
17.
18.
19.
70.
21.
22.
73.
24.
75.
78.
77.
EMISSION UNIT BACT
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE/PAINT APPLICATION 0
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE/PAINT APPLICATION 0
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE SPA I NT APPLICATION 0
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE/PAINT APPLICATION 0
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE /PA I NT APPLICATION 0
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE/PAINT APPLICATION 0
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE/FLASH-OFF AREA 0
SURFACE COATING OF METAL FURNITURE/BAKE OVEN AREA 0
STORAGE VESSEL FOR FUEL OIL FIXED ROOF TANKS
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCIHER CALCINER DESIGN
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALCINER CALCINER DESIGN
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLAKT/CALC1NER CALCINER DESIGN
PHOSPHATE ROCK PLANT/CALC1NEP! CALCINER DESIGN
GRAPHIC ARTS/OFFSET PRESSES VOX CATALYTIC INCINERATION
GRAPHIC ARTS/OFFSET PRESSES VOZ CATALYTIC INCINERATION
GRAPHIC ARTS/OFFSET PRESSES '01 CATALYTIC INCINERATION
GRAPHIC ARTS/OFFSET PRESSES VOX CATALYTIC INCINERATION
GRAPHIC ARTS/OFFSET PRESSES VOX CATALYTIC INCINERATION
GRAPHIC ARTS/OFFSET PRESSES VOX CATALYTIC INCINERATION
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT/KILN NATURAL GAS
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT/ETHAHOL PRODUCTION SUBMERGED LOADING/VAPER RECOVERY
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT/ORTER CONDENSERS
FOOD PROCESSING PLANT/PREPARATION DRYER-COOLER
FOOD PROCESSING PLANT/PREPARATION DRYER-COOLER
FOOD PROCESSING PLANT/PREPARATION DRYER-COOLER
TEXTILE PRODUCT 1 OK PLANT/ELASTIC FIBER EXTRUDER CARBON ADSORPTION
HOOD PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING/FURNITURE FINISHING NO CONTROL
CONTROL ALTERNATIVE
TECHNOLOGY (
CATALYTIC INCINERATO
CATALYTIC INCINERATO
CATALYTIC INCINERAIO
CATALYTIC INCINERATO
CATALYTIC INCINERATO
CATALYTIC INCINERATO
CATALYTIC INCINERATO
CATALYTIC INCINERAIO
FLOATING ROOF
AFTERBURNER
AFTERBURNER
AFTERBURNER
AFTERBURNER
SOLVENT REDUCTION
SOLVENT REDUCTION
SOLVENT REDUCTION
SOLVENT REDUCTION
SOLVENT REDUCTION
SOLVENT REDUCTION
AFTER BURNER
SCRUBBER
CARBON BEP ADSORP.
CARBON ABSORBTION
CARBON ABSORBTION
CARBON ABEORBTION
THERMAL INCINERATION
HATER BASED COATING
I CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 2 CONTROL ALTERNATIVE 1
,)^, TECHNOLOGY (,)&, TECHNOLOSV (,)&,,
2500 CARBON ADSORPTION
2500 CARBUN ADSORPTION
2500 CARBUN ADSORPTION
2500 CAKBUN ADSORPTION
2500 CARBON ADSORPTION
2500 CARBON ADSORPTION
2500 CARHON ADSORPTION
2500 CARBUN ADSORPTION
0 0
INCREASE COM*. TEMP
INCREASE CONB. TEMP
INCREASE COMB. TEMP
INCREASE COMB. TEMP
COOLER/ESP
COOLER/ESP
COOLER/ESP
COOLER/ESP
COOLER/ESP
COOLER/ESP
0
CLOSED VENT SYSTEM
THERMAL INCIN.
INCINERATION
INCINERATION
INCINERATION
10330 CAT. INCINERATION
200 0
2300 0
2300 0
2500 0
2300
2300
2300
2300
2300
0
0
0
CARBON AtSORPTION
CARBON ADSORPTION
CARBON ABSORPTION
CARION ADSORPTION
CARION ADSORPTION
CARION ADSORPTION
) 0
0
CAT. INCINERATION
0
0
0
3420 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
»
0
0
0
0
0
DB 81-84
-------
4.4.1 Frequency of Control Technology Alternatives Analyses
Tables 4-26 through 4-30 present the frequency with which control
alternatives analyses were available in the permit files for PM, S02, NOx,
CO and VOC, respectively. Although specific values are presented for the
frequency of analyses, it does not necessarily mean that they adequately
represent the frequencies that alternatives analyses were performed.
Rather, these values represent the frequencies with which these data were
readily available in the permit files.
Four categories are presented in these tables, subdivided by the number
of control alternatives analyzed in each specific BACT analysis:
BACT analyses where NSPS did not apply;
t BACT analyses where NSPS did apply and the BACT decision was equal
to NSPS;
BACT analyses where NSPS did apply and the BACT was more stringent
than NSPS; and
0 Total BACT decisions.
In each of the four categories, both the number of cases and the percent of
category totals are presented. For instance, in Table 4-26 it shows that
there are 1020 BACT decisions for PM in the data base where NSPS did not
apply. Of those 1020 BACT decisions, 894 (87.6 percent) did not present any
alternatives analyses, 27 (2.6 percent) involved analysis of 1 control
alternative, 78 (7.6 percent) involved analysis of 2 control alternatives,
and so on. Looking at the bottom row in Table 4-26, it is seen that there
were 1191 BACT decisions for PM in the data base of which 171 (107 + 64)
involved NSPS, 107 of the 171 were permitted at the NSPS rate and 64 were
permitted below the NSPS rate. Again, the values shown in the "zero"
alternatives analyzed row of these tables do not necessarily mean that
control alternatives were not analyzed - they mean only that this
information was not readily available in the permit files.
81
-------
TABLE 4-26. NUMBER OF PM CONTROL ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN BACT DECISIONS
FOR EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO PSD REGULATIONS
Number
of Control
Alternatives
Analyzed*
0
1
2
00
ro 3
4
5
>5
TOTAL
1
BACT Decisions
Not Involving
NSPS for PM
Number Percent
894
27
78
10
11
0
0
1020
87. 6%
2.6%
7.68
1.0%
1.1%
0.0)5
0.055
100*
BACT
Number
64
14
24
5
0
0
0
107
NUMBER OF PM
BACT Decisions
Rate Equals
NSPS Rate
Percent
59. 6%
13.1%
22.4)5
4.7)5
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
BACT DECISIONS
Involving NSPS
BACT Rate
than
Number
44
4
7
6
3
0
0
64
for PM
1s more Stringent
NSPS Rate
Percent
68.855
6.3!5
10.9)5
9.455
4.7%
0.05
0.0*
100%
Total
Number
1002
45
109
21
14
0
0
1191
Percent
84. lit
3.85?
9.2)5
1.8%
1.255
0.0*
0.0%
10055
In many cases. Information was not available to determine 1f control alternatives were considered 1n BACT decisions. Where this Information
was not available, the number of control alternatives analyzed was assumed to be zero. Thus, the data represent a conservative estimate.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-27. NUMBER OF S02 CONTROL ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN BACT DECISIONS
FOR EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO PSD REGULATIONS
NUMBER OF S0_ BACT DECISIONS
Number
of Control
Alternatives
Analyzed*
0
1
2
CO
OJ
3
4
5
>5
TOTAL
BACT Decisions
Not Involving
NSPS for SO.
Number
930
90
44
17
12
2
4
1099
''Percent
84.6%
8.2)5
4.0)8
1.5*
1.1*
0.2*
0.4*
100*
BACT Declslons^Involvlna NSPS
BACT
Number
101
22
15
5
7
2
0
152
Rate Equals
NSPS Rate
Percent
66.4*
14.5*
9.9*
3.3*
4.6*
1.3*
0.0*
100*
BACT Rate
than
Number
164
5
6
2
0
2
0
179
for SO.
1s more^Strlngent
NSPS Rate
Percent
91.6*
2.8*
3.4*
1.1*
0.0*
1.1*
0.0*
100*
Total
Number
1195
117
65
24
19
6
4
1430
Percent
83.6*
8.2*
4.5*
1.7*
1.3*
0.4*
0.3*
100*
In many cases. Information was not available to determine 1f control alternatives were considered 1n BACT decisions. Where this Information
was not available, the number of control alternatives analyzed was assumed to be zero. Thus, the data represent a conservative estimate.
DB 81-84
-------
00
TABLE 4-28. NUMBER OF NOx CONTROL ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN BACT DECISIONS
FOR EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO PSD REGULATIONS
NUMBER OF NOx BACT DECISIONS
Number
of Control
Alternatives
Analyzed*
0
1
2
3
4
5
>5
TOTAL
BACT Decisions
Not Involving
NSPS for NOx
Number
1147
70
61
84
18
15
2
1397
Percent
82. IX
5. OX
4.4X
6.0%
1.3%
1.1%
0.2%
100X
BACT Rate
NSPS
Number
109
85
11
42
0
0
0
247
BACT Decisions
Equals
Rate
Percent
44.1%
34.4%
4.5X
17. OX
O.OX
O.OX
O.OX
100%
Involving NSPS
BACT Rate
than
Number
14
4
21
3
1
2
0
45
for NOx
1s more Stringent
NSPS Rate
Percent
31.1%
6.9%
46. 7X
6.7X
2.2X
4.4X
O.OX
100%
Total
Number
1270
159
93
129
19
17
2
1689
Percent
75. 2X
9.4%
5.5%
7.6%
1.1%
1.0%
0.2%
100%
In many cases, Information was not available to determine 1f control alternatives were considered In BACT decisions. Where this Information
was not available, the number of control alternatives analyzed was assumed to be zero. Thust the data represent a conservative estimate.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-29. NUMBER OF CO CONTROL ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN BACT DECISIONS
FOR EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO PSD REGULATIONS
, .............. .... __ .._,__.,..,..-.,__..,...
NUMBER OF CO BACT DECISIONS
Number
of Control
Alternatives
Analyzed*
0
1
00 2
en *
3
4
5
>5
TOTAL
BACT Decisions
Not Involving
NSPS for CO
Number
1093
34
18
0
0
4
0
1149
Percent
95.1*
3.0%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
100%
BACT
Number
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
BACT Decisions Involving
Rate Equals BACT
NSPS Rate
NSPS
Rate
than
Percent Number
85.7)5
14.3*
0.05
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
for CO
Is more Stringent
NSPS Rate
Percent
1003
0.0*
0.0%
0.0*
0.0%
0.0*
0.0*
100*
Total
Number
1101
35
18
0
0
4
0
1158
Percent
95.1*
3.0*
1.6*
0.0*
0.0*
0.3*
0.0*
100*
In many cases. Information was not available to determine If control alternatives were considered 1n BACT decisions. Where this Information
was not available/ the number of control alternatives analyzed was assumed to be zero. Thus, the data represent a conservative estimate.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 4-30.NUMBER OF VOC CONTROL ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN BACT DECISIONS
FOR EMISSION UNITS SUBJECT TO PSD REGULATIONS
NUMBER OF VOC BACT DECISIONS
Number
of Control
Alternatives
Analyzed*
0
1
0,
01
3
4
5
>5
TOTAL
BACT Decisions
Not Involving
NSPS for VOC
Number Percent
639
4
40
8
0
6
0
697
91.7?
0.6%
5.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
100%
BACT Rate
NSPS
Number
45
1
0
0
0
0
0
46
BACT Decisions
Equals
Rate
Percent
97. 8%
2.77.
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
Involving NSPS
BACT Rate
than
Number
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
for VOC
1s more Stringent
NSPS Rate
Percent
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
Number
685
5
40
8
0
6
0
744
Total
Percent
92.155
0.1%
5.4*
1.1%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
100%
In many cases, Information was not available to determine 1f control alternatives were considered In BACT decisions. Where this Information
was not available, the number of control alternatives analyzed was assumed to be zero. Thus, the data represent a conservative estimate.
DB 81-84
-------
4.4.2 Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) of Control Technology
Alternatives
The ICE data for control technology alternatives shown in Tables 4-21
through 4-25 were compiled, grouped and analyzed and are presented in Table
4-31. This was done only in cases where the ICE information was presented.
Again, the data are grouped into the same four categories:
t BACT decisions not involving NSPS;
BACT decisions equal to applicable NSPS;
BACT decisions more stringent than applicable NSPS; and
t All BACT decisions where ICE data were available.
The mean ICE data shown are simply arithmetic averages of all the
alternatives analyzed for the specified pollutant for the indicated
category.
The greatest amount of data was found for SO* emission control
alternatives where 129 control alternatives were analyzed in 65 BACT
analyses. The mean ICE of the alternatives is $1000/ton. This means that,
on average and based on data presented in the permit files, S0? emission
control alternatives more stringent than BACT would cost about $1000 for
each additional ton of S02 removed above and beyond the BACT controls for
this pollutant.
87
-------
TABLE 4-31. INCREMENTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS (ICE) VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH
CONTROL ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN BACT DECISIONS*
BACT Decisions Involvlna NSPS
BACT Decisions not Involving
NSPS for a Deslanated Pollutant
Pollu-
tant
PM
00 S02
OO
NO
CO
VOC
Number
of BACT
Decisions
10
47
IS
2
23
Number of
Control
Alter-
natives
Analyzed
16
103
39
2
44
Mean
ICE
($/ton)
6933
1015
396
3967
9000
Range
of ICE
($/ton)
329-
10,000
67-
10,419
49-
14,804
3400-
4534
200-
70,000
BACT Rate Eauals
Number
of BACT
Decisions
3
11
1
0
0
Number of
Control
Alter-
natives
Analyzed
4
15
3
0
0
NSPS Rate
Mean
ICE
($/ton)
1944
943
1558
__
__
Range
of ICE
($/ton)
100-
3861
121-
3536
1300-
2654
__
__
for Designated Pollutant
BACT Rate Is more
StMnaent than NSPS Rate
Number
of BACT
Decisions
2
7
0
0
0
Number of
Control
Alter- Mean
natives ICE
Analyzed ($/ton)
8 23,085
11 575
0
0
0
Range
of ICE
($/ton)
12,647-
42,575
341-
3500
__
__
__
All BACT Decisions
with ICE Data
Number
of BACT
Decisions
15
65
16
2
23
Number of
Control
Alter-
natives
Analyzed
28
129
42
2
44
Mean
ICE
($/ton)
7006
1000
494
3967
9000
*
Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) data was associated with less than 2 percent of the BACT decisions.
DB 81-84
-------
5.0 EFFECTS OF AIR QUALITY CONSTRAINTS ON
EMISSION REDUCTIONS BEYOND NSPS
A prerequisite for obtaining a PSD permit is the demonstration that a
proposed project will not cause or contribute to a violation of an allowable
PSD increment (for PM and S02) or a National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). If preliminary analysis shows a potential violation of an
increment or NAAQS, the project must generally be altered. Often, the
allowable emission rates are decreased to a level where air quality analyses
indicates no potential violations. Generally, these types of project
alterations are done before the permit application is submitted and thus,
the permit files do not indicate the degree to which air quality constraints
affected allowable emissions. However, an examination of emission
reductions beyond NSPS was performed, as discussed below, in an attempt to
identify reasons as to why emission limitations more stringent than NSPS
were required in PSD permits:
For each PSD permit, the degree of emission reductions beyond
NSPS attributable to air quality constraints was determined by
scaling the ambient impacts of the proposed emissions to the same
degree as the ratio of the NSPS allowable emission rate to the
BACT allowable emission rate and determining if the resulting
value is greater than air quality ceilings. If a ceiling was
calculated to be exceeded by the scaled emissions, the amount of
emission reduction was assigned to one of the following
categories:
1. PM or S02 increment constraints, as applicable; and
2. PM, S02, or NOX NAAQS constraints, as applicable.
In the PM and S02 analyses, priority was given to increment
constraints. This means that if both PSD increments and NAAQS
89
-------
played a role in establishing stringent emission limitations, then
the credit was assigned to the PSD increment category. Thus,
emission reductions beyond NSPS attributed to NAAQS constraints
may be underestimated. If no ceiling was calculated to be
exceeded, then the emission reduction beyond NSPS was deemed
attributable to case-by-case BACT. And, if sufficient data were
not available to perform the air quality ceiling analysis, then
the emission reduction was assigned to the category "unable to
determine cause". This is basically the same procedure used to
determine causes of emission reductions beyond NSPS presented in
the original NSR report.
Table 5-1 presents the results of this air quality screening analysis.
In the 1984 data base, PM emission reductions beyond NSPS associated with
increment constraints were 60 percent of the total. This represents a
significant change from the 1981 data base where only 2.5 percent of the
total emission reductions were attributed to increment constraints.
Particulate matter NAAQS constraints were not significant in either data
base.
In the 1984 data base, total SCL emission reductions beyond NSPS
associated with increment constraints and NAAQS constraints were 78 percent
and 4 percent, respectively. This compares to 53 percent and 17 percent for
the 1981 data base.
In the 1984 data base, 83 percent of the NO emission reductions was
J\
associ-ated with case-by-case BACT decisions, and less than one percent was
attributed to NAAQS. PSD increments do not apply to nitrogen oxides.
90
-------
TABLE 5-1. EMISSION REDUCTIONS BEYOND NSPS AND PARTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS BY
PROBABLE CAUSE OF THOSE REDUCTIONS (IN TONS/YEAR)
Pollutant
Pa'rtlculate Matter
Original (1981) Data Base
Updated (1984) Data Base
Sulfur Dioxide
Original (1961) Data Base
Updated (1984) Data Base
Nitrogen Oxide
Original (1981) Data Base
Updated (1984) Data Base
As a Result As, a Result
of Increment of NAAQS
Constraints Constraints
200 0
10,644 362
115,500 36,100
115,949 5,944
N/A
N/A 58
As a Result
of Case-by-Case
BACT
2,300
418
56,600
7,608
8,019
Unable to
Determine
Cause
5,200
6,315
10,500
18,334
1,572
Total Emission
Reductions
Beyond NSPS
7,700
17,749
218,700
147,835
54,400
9,649
Total Permitted
Emissions
for Sources
Subject to NSPS
35,200
52,829
603,400
630,380
606,300
533,959
N/A = not applicable.
DB 79-84
-------
APPENDIX A
PSD PERMIT APPLICATIONS IN 1984 DATA BASE
-------
APPENDIX A
EPAJOt STATE
-------
EPAJBO2 STATE*)
PNJEICr SOLENET NO-ENET OLENET VOCJEJCT NPOINT NRJG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
25 COGNRATIOM DEVELOPMENT CORP
26 HOFFflAN-LA ROCHE INC.
27 iF GOODRICH CHEMICAL GROUP
28 SCHERING - PLOUGH CORP.
29 HERCULES INC.
STATE
66.79
-29.00
0.00
28.12
39.00
441.96
0.00
0.00
220.76
355.00
1824.20
2272.00
0.00
151.12
503.00
42.48
6.00
0.00
23.12
50.30
7.72
9.80
0.00
0.31
0.00
4
2
1
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
3
2
2
104.91 1017.72 4750.32 121.90 17.83 12 1
36
23
23
23
23
EPAJBG-2 STATELY
ces SRCJWC
30 AIRCO SPEER CARSON-GRAPHITE
31 HOOKER CHEMICAL
32 AUBURN STEEL COMPANY
33 IBM
34 IBH
35 IBH
36 IBH
37 POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF
38 IBH CORP
39 CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORP.
40 UESTCHESTER CO. IKD. DEV. AGCY
41 PROCTER t GAWLE HANUFAC. CO.
PH-ENET SONNET NO-ENET CORNET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRC-DESC SRC-TYPE
12.00
0.00
57.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
952.65
17.00
0.00
206.00
140.00
1.0
1220.0
0.0
37.0
22.3
37.0
26.0
11974.9
222.0
0.0
657.0
-35.0
36.0
2800.0
0.0
38.0
23.0
38.0
27.0
17765.3
367.0
549.7
985.0
-250.0
635.00
150.00
81.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1246.55
26.24
203.00
330.00
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.64
1.00
7.81
31.50
92.00
7
2
2
12
3
8
7
3
5
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
4
46
23
6
53
53
53
53
1
23
33
9
49
STATE
1384.65 I4I62.2 22379.0 2671.99 149.95 56
EPA_REG=2 STATE*PR
OBS SRC-NAHE PH-ENET SO.ENET NO-ENET OLENET VOCJENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJJESC SRC.TYPE
42 ABBOTT LABORATORIES 131 1610 2418 158 184 1 0 2 23
EPA-REG-2 STATE=VI
S SRCJMHE
43 MARTIN MARIETTA ALUMINUM INC.
44 tSS OIL VIRGIN ISLANDS
45 HESS OIL VIRGIN ISLANDS CORP.
46 VIRGIN ISLANDS REFINERY CORP
PH^MET SO-ENET NO.ENET OLENET WKLENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJJESC SRC-TYPE
7
13
13
13
STATE
EPAJSG
404.00
1452.00
21.80
3901.00
4224.0
15590.0
24.6
4153.0
2742.0
3458.0
294.6
4254.0
112.
122.
26.
1082.
00
00
31
00
28.00
2498.00
5.76
4990.00
2
8
7
7
2
3
0
3
4
5
3
1
5778.80 23991.6 10748.6 1342.31 7521.76 24 13
7399.36 40781.6 40295.9 4294.20 7873.54 93 21
A-2
-------
EPAJEG-3 STATE=W
DBS SRCJwe- PILENET SLENET NO_ENET OLENET voc-oer NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC_TYPE
47 NE MARYLAND HWSTE DISPOSAL 43.69 1259 1001 406 -1430.49 302 9
EPAJEG-3 STATE=PA
DBS SRC-NAME PM-ENET SO-ENET NO.ENET OLENET VOC.ENET NPOINT ffUG SRCJCSC SRC-TYPE
48 A.E. STALEY MANUFACTURING CO 116.00 1090.0 763.0 44.0 13.0 102 49
49 TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORP 0.00 0.3 514.2 89.1 16.2 102 33
50 874.00 16500.0 16500.0 1100.0 275.0 111 1
51 DOHTAR CHEMICALS GROUP / LINE DI 16.20 101.1 134.7 89.3 0.0 10 3 14
52 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY 0.08 0.1 UO.O 62.0 24.0 202 33
53 CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL COMPANY 56.00 528.0 155.0 21.0 10.0 101 2
54 AIRCO SPEER CARBON - GRAPHITE 0.00 0.0 36.0 1066.0 9.0 4 0 3 46
STATE 1062.28 18219.5 18212.9 2471.9 347.2 11 1
EPA_REG=3 STATE=VA
DBS SRC-NAME PH^NET SO-ENET NO.ENET CO_Ef£T VOC_Ef£T fPOINT NFUG SRCJJESC SRC.TYPE
55 PHILLIP MORRIS USA 103 2067 726 0 0 122 49
EPA_REG=3 STATE=W
OBS SRCJW PtLEf£T SO.EI£T NO_E»£T CO^£T VOCJNET fPOINT NFU3 SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
56 CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORP 0.00 0.0 325.8 5.11 10.23 202 33
57 BORG-WARf£R CORPORATION 4.16 96.4 48.2 0.00 0.00 1 0 2 23
58 PENNSYLVANIA COKE TECHNOLOGY INC 154.00 706.0 3440.0 0.00 0.00 30 3 1 16
STATE 158.16 802.4 3814.0 5.11 10.23 33 3
EPA_REO 1367.1322347.923753.92883.01-1073.1 48 6
EPA_REG=4 STATE=AL
OBS SRC-NAME PN.ENET SO_EJ£T NO.ENET OLENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJJESC SRC.TYPE
59 SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. 0.0 0.0 579.0 42.4 15.4 102 33
60 HOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PROD. SE 75.0 156.0 1290.0 195.0 0.0 16 0 1 33
61 SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS-CO. 0.0 0.1 723.5 53.1 19.0 102 44
62 INDEPENDENT KRAFT CORP. 564.0 4356.0 1796.0 2185.0 0.0 8 1 1 3
63 ALABAMA FEED PROD. 72.0 723.0 337.0 0.0 0.0 102 49
64 ISA INTERNATIONAL 480.0 5761.0 3758.0 210.0 0.0 3 1 1 50
65 MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION fc PROD. 11.0 899.0 233.0 56.0 24.0 501 44
66 MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PROD. 64.0 142.0 1944.0 809.0 18.0 601 44
67 GENERAL ELEC CORP 944.912567.0 7950.3 1059.1 436.6 56 12 I 23
A-3
-------
EPAJE3M STATE=fL
OBS SRCJWe PMNET SLENET NO.ENET CORNET VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRC-DESC SRC.TYPE
68 NEU MALES CHEMICAL CO 0.00 1050.0 36.8 0.00 0.00 2 0 3 11
69 KISSIftE l/TILITIES 69.00 1700.0 1095.0 227.00 82.00 1 0 2 1
70 AMAX PHOSPHATE INC. 42.80 214.4 57.1 0.00 0.00 1 0 4 15
71 MONSftNTO TEXTILES 0.00 0.0 0.0 573.00 470.00 213 23
72 ATLANTIC SUGAR ASSOC. 51.50 187.2 64.4 94.90 93.80 102 49
73 CONTAINER CORP OF AMERICA 188.00 1108.0 2091.0 225.00 50.00 122 3
74 BREWSTER PHOSPHATE 0.00 571.0 347.0 41.00 8.20 2 I 4 15
75 FLORIDA STEEL CORP. 107.31 404.1 98.6 213.43 3.06 2 1 2 6
76 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 5.00 951.0 39.2 3.00 1.00 3 0 6 43
77 SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOP. OF FL 324.00 805.0 209.0 326.00 325.00 102 49
78 CONSERVING 0.00 930.8 154.6 0.00 0.00 1 0 3 11
79 THE BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP 1294.00 -1449.0 -136.0 25.00 -55.00 104 3
80 OSCEOLA FMHS CO. 34.90 228.4 72.4 99.90 99.90 102 49
81 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 22.40 443.9 0.0 0.00 0.00 4 0 4 15
82 MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORP. 150.22 1381.6 151.2 31.41 6.26 321 15
83 CITY OF NEU SMYRNA BEACH 2.10 4.1 535.0 87.00 . 302 36
84 ORLANDO UTILITIES COHM. 1042.00 39606.0 20845.0 1737.00 17.00 3 15 1 1
85 TRANSGULF PIPELINE CO 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 233.00 0 42 1 25
86 SEBUING UTILITIES COMMISSION 142.00 3364.0 4304.0 832.00 378.00 2.0 1 36
87 ST. JOE PAPER 24.40 0.0 402.0 1319.00 72.00 102 3
38 MCKAY BAY REFUSE ENERGY 122.20 744.6 1314.0 74.50 39.40 201 9
89 FLORIDA MINING & MATERIALS CORP. 169.00 13.1 355.4 39.00 11.70 2 12 5 4
STATE 3790.8352758.133035.75953.141335.32 39 76
EPAJfcGM STATE=CA
OBS SRCJWME PM.ENET SO.ENET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOC_ENET NPOINT NFUG SWLDESC SRC.TYPE
90 SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. 0.00 0.04 190.00 46.35 5.7? 102 33
91 AUSTELL BOX BOARD CORP 72.101140.00 608.70 30.10 10.30 112 42
92 GOLD KIST INC. ' 42.00 40.00 291.00 79.00 79.00 112 49
93 MULLITE COMPANY OF AMER. . 41.00 41.00 . . 204 48
94 GEORGIA KAOLIN CO 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 505 48
95 SAVANNAH FOODS & INDUSTRIES 156.401914.00 469.00 -2.30 1.10 1 1 2 49
96 ANGLO AMERICAN CLAYS CORP. 100.85 7.56 19.42 2.54 1.24 735 48
97 SOUTHEAST ENERGY 32.30 46.30 254.20 102.30 196.50 601 49
98 ABITIBI PRICE SOUTHERN CORP. 168.42 1347.36 505.26 421.00 481.00 2 ' 0 2 42
99 INTERSTATE PAPER CORP. 153.00 455.00 455.00 328.00 328.00 102- 3
100 CITY OF SAVANNAH 63.00 210.00 140.00 166.00 11.00 201 9
101 ANGLO-AMERICAN CLAY 89.00 13.33 31.83 4.02 1.39 9 0 5 48
102 ENGELHARD CORP. 57.70 33.60 27.30 4.10 2.30 4 0 5 48
103 GOLD KIST INC. 42.00 40.00 291.00 79.00 79.00 102 49
104 PROCTOR i GAMBLE 202.50 113.40 39.40 7.90 1.30 21 0 5 23
105 UNION CARBIDE 36.00 217.42 120.74 379.65 1.80 4 0 5 23
106 SPARTAN MILLS 125.00 1498.00 876.00 52.00 15.50 232 41
107 MILLIKEN 4 CO. 53.00 797.00 315.00 42.00 21.00 112 35
108 COATS & CLARK INC. 28.50 474.00 199.00 25.00 13.00 1.2 41
STATE 1516.77 3339.06 4873.35 1766.66 1249.72 72 10
A-4
-------
EPAJEO4 STATWY
OBS sRCJwe pttuer SCLDCT NO.ENET CO-DCT VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
109 KENTUCKY UTILITIES CO 1763.80 31536.0 34952.0 2794.00 0.00 3 24 1 1
110 AIRCO CARBIDE 16.90 243.2 21.1 20.51 35.62 1 16 5 23
111 ARCO METALS COMPANY 309.00 2052.8 29.4 2.80 0.49 4 31 3 7
112 ASHLAND SYNTHETIC FUELS INC. 680.06 5039.9 4134.9 1225.25 1013.21 54 48 1 20
113 KY. AGRICULTURE EJCRGY CORP. 67.50 814.7 339.0 29.00 33.70 242 49
STATE 2837.28 39686.6 39526.4 4071.56 1083.02 64 123
EPA_REO=4 STATE=«S
OBS SRCJJAME PM.ENET SO.ENET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOC_£NET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
114 SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. 0.00 1 163.90 46.2 10.42 102 33
115 REPUBLIC REFINING CO. 3.60 1336 37.60 0.0 0.00 4 0 1 44
116 SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. 0.00 0 400.98 80.6 . 202 44
117 SHELL OIL COMPANY -4.30 -21610 -34.40 -500.0 -2.30 103 44
113 TOMLINSON INTEREST INC 0.15 2085 0.00 0.0 0.00 1 0 1 33
119 TOMLINSON INTERESTS INC. 0.00 6000 0.00 0.0 0.00 3 0 2 33
120 AMERADA HESS CORP 480.00 7875 2851.00 997.0 1992.00 21 32 5 13
121 FIRST CHEMICAL CO. 0.00 0 191.63 0.0 0.00 103 12
122 LEAF RIVER FOREST PRODUCTS INC. 1156.32 7722 3057.24 2868.9 271.56 411 3
STATE 1635.77 3409 6667.95 3492.7 2271.68 38 33
EPAJ£G=4 STATE=tC
OBS SRCJWE PtLENET SO.ENET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOCjENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
123 FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO 256.00 499.00 306.00 702.0 308.00 154 3
124 FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO 123.00 1677.00 431.00 810.0 -13.00 205 3
125 FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY 422.00 2628.00 2245.00 1891.0 3.80 3 6 5 3
126 LITHIUM CORP. OF AMERIC 10.00 394.20 150.00 6.0 2.20 I 0 4 23
127 CROWN MOOD PRODUCTS CO 17.80 9.00 3.60 12.0 656.00 20 5 42
128 PEAT METHANOL ASSOC. 120.40 685.90 560.00 1032.6 98.90 3 17 1 20
129 N.C. PHOSPHATE CORP 20.00 -32.00 920.00 24677.0 99.00 504 15
130 GLOBE MFG. CO. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 111.70 103 41
131 KINCAID FURN. CO. 24.99 0.?4 4.30 25.4 819.00 12 0 1 42
132 BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES INC. 58.64 37.23 177.17 7.0 3.05 132 41
133 CAROLINA STALITE CO. 70.10 273.30 142.35 18.8 9.60 205 32
134 GEORGIA - PACIFIC CORPORATION 45.50 1.90 3.30 2.4 2.40 7 0 3 42
135 PROCTOR CHEMICAL 4.90 0.00 0.00 0.0 303.00 103 23
136 DIVERSIFIED FUELS INC. 174.101472.10 902.00 9.4 56.30 1 33 1 49
137 rtALLINCKROD & CHEMICAL 24.00 300.60 166.10 20.4 10.60 102 23
STATE 1371.437947.076011.3229214.0 2470.55 48 64
A-5
-------
EWLREG-4 STATE=SC
OBS SRCJW6
138 AIRCO-SPEER C/W8CN GRAPHITE
139 BOHATER CAROLINA CO
140 ANCHOR CONTINENTAL
141 S.C. PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY
142 M.UHJH
143 CAROLINA FOREST IND.
144 UNION CAMP CORP
STATE
PH_EHET SO-ENET NQ.ENET OLENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
279.7 1311.1 166.7 18933.4
398.0 1946.0 723.0 2838.0
52.3 246.3 71.7 28.0
683.3 9338.2 13665.6 911.0
246.4 2483.5 43.8 19716.6
459.7 3395.3 2799.8 291.4
2286.0 20235.0 8868.0 6570.0
4405.4 38955.4 26338.6 49288.4 126.9 145 6
126.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
,
120
2
2
1
2
3
15
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
1
5
2
2
3
1
1
46
3
50
I
7
42
3
EPA_REG=4 STATE=TN
OSS SRCJ1A*
145 INTER-STATE PAVING CO
146 CARGILL INC.
147 TENNESSEE RIVER PULP & PAPER
148 DIXIE CEMENT COMPANY
149 MIDDLE TENN. STATE UNIV.
150 BEECH GROVE PROCESSING
151 HARRIHAN PAPERBOMD CO.
152 NAP CONSUMER ELECTRONICS
153 BOUATER SOUTHERN PAPER CO
154 PLUS NARK
155 TILLET BROS. PAVING CO.
156 TENNESSEE EASTMN CO
157 SONOCO PRODUCTS CO.
158 TENNESSEE SYNFUELS
159 TAPPAN COMPANY
160 nOLTAN COMPANY
161 STflLEY CORP
162 METALS ENGINEERING CORP.
163 ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE
164 CONSOLIDATED M.URINUH
165 NISSM MOTORS
STATE
EPA-REG
PM-ENET SONNET NO.ENET OLENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC-TYPE
50.0
27.0
412.5
359.9
58.3
240.9
-10.0
56.1
-1.1
0.0
50.0
13.3
62.3
2263.0
0.0
237.1
295.5
1.0
46.0
125.9
208.2
4495.9
22264.3
29
2044
4520
18
790
0
-87
508
-304
0
18
0
435
10950
0
1020
2435
0
810
1
3762
26949
202698
5
664
2637
482
158
0
610
112
0
0
3
7
302
14895
0
252
1248
28
186
227
743
22558
157623
1
77
929
53
11
0
B
7
1033
0
1
130
40
21749
0
14
137
2
657
17
24857
123254
0.2
38.0
929.4
15.3
5.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
665.3
0.1
1230.0
20.1
812.0
715.0
4.4
1150.2
274.2
27.4
1207.9
1131.0
8226.4
17776.6
I
1
1
2
1
0
1
2
2
4
1
35
1
22
1
4
3
6
1
24
3
116
619
0
4
4
22
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
10
0
2
6
0
I
2
27
32
408
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
3
4
1
5
2
5
1
38
49
3
4
35
32
42
53
3
50
38
23
23
20
56
48
49
56
35
22
47
EPAJEO5 STATE-IL
OBS SRCJIAHE
167 A. E. STALEY MANUFACTURING
168 OEPT. OF AIR FORCE
169 CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COHPMJY
170 ESK CORP
171 WORLD COLOR PRESS
172 UNION OIL COMPANY
PtLENET SO.ENET NO.ENET OLENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
15.9
36.0
-8.0
28.8
0.0
13.0
-10.5
683.0
-627.0
493.3
150.0
0.0
10.0
131.9
342.0
376.0
193.3
0.0
103.1
13.58 -2704.7
50.00
99.00
28.10
.
0.00
47.00
25.0
1.4
99.4
t
587.0
15.6
4
1
4
2
3
13
6
5
1
4
6
0
0
2
5
2
2
5
3
3
5
49
49
24
47
23
50
13
A-6
-------
STATE=IL
DBS SRC.NA*
173 QUINCY SOYBEAN CO
174 MIDWEST SOLENTS CO OF ILLINOIS
175 KOPPERS COMPANY
176 SOYLAfffl POWER COOPERATIVE
177 KILNGAS RID, INC.
178 CLARK OIL AND REFINING COMPANY
STATE
PttENET SO-ENET NO-ENET CO-ENCT VOLENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
20.0 1960.0 593.0 219.00
19.0 892.0 447.0 477.00
0.0 430.0 0.0 -900.00
680.0 14650.0 12750.0 2200.00
10.0 1010.0 285.0 725.00
83.6 -595.5 201.4 55.50
898.3 19045.815422.73014.18 -1933.5 50 33
1.6
0.0
-55.0
10.0
16.0
70.2
2
1
4
1
1
8
2
2
0
4
0
7
2
2
8
1
2
5
49
23
23
1
20
13
EPA_REG=5 STATE=ILLI
OBS SRC-NAME PILENET SO-ENET NO-ENET CO_£NET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
179 B. F. GOODRICH CHEMICAL GROUP 46.1 793 396 264 9.9 I 4 2 23
EPA_R£G=5 STATE=IN
OBS SRC-NAME
180 MEAD JOHNSON AND CO
181 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
182 ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
183 ELI LILLY AND CO
184 ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM
185 A.E. STALEY MANUFACTURING
STATE
PM-ENET SO-ENET NO-ENET CO.ENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRC.DESC SRC.TYPE
30.0
-72.3
7.0
45.0
0.0
-15.6
1106
1802
160
0
0
253
360
1452
120
670
0
603
37.4
-910.0
,
44.0
0.0
29.0
18.9
-617.0
,
13.0
404.0
1.4
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
0
2
0
2
2
1
4
2
3
7
23
23
23
23
22
49
-5.9 3321 3205 -799.6 -179.7 11 8
EPAJ£G=5 STATE=«I
OBS SRC-NAME
186 SHELL OIL COMPANY
187 PACKAGING CORP. OF AM.
188 NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNI.
189 CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL
190 UNI\£RSITY OF MICHIGAN
191 STEELCASE, INC
192 STEELCASE, INC
193 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
194 MEAD PAPER
195 GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP
196 GERBER PRODUCTS CO
197 COPPER RANGE COMPANY
198 GENERAL MOTORS CORP
199 CONSUMERS POWER CO.
200 AMOCO PRODUCTION CO.
PM.ENET SO.ENET NO-ENET OLENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJJESC SRC.TYPE
44
42
35
3
24
56
56
47
3
54
49
8
47
1
44
-86.
20.
714.
,90
,10
,40
128.80
87.
21.
-2.
265.
24,
19.
12.
0.
14.
,40
,00
,20
,00
,00
,00
,50
,00
,10
0,52
383.0
1682.0
340.
7433.
1341.
2798.
664.
2389.
1782.
1670.
1053.
40.
1.
1.
0.
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
7
0
154.
1183.
290.
2589.
386.
1049.
251.
1346.
2049.
0.
378.
40.
258.
563.
578.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
4
0
0
4
0
4
7
0
128.
t
2389.
46.
140.
34.
181.
6237.
0.
57.
1695.
29.
47.
43.
0
0
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
8
9
5
0.
,
,
9.
70.
,
2387.
0.
0.
28.
40.
7.
0.
14.
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
2
6
2
4
1
33
1
2
2
1
2
3
4
0
2
2
3
0
2
2
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
2
1
2
2
2
1
8
4
2
3
2
2
5
STATE
1217.72 21578.8 11116.5 11030.0 2555.3 73 18
A-7
-------
EPAJSW STflTE=«M
OSS SRCJWe PH-ENET SOD£T NCLQCT CORNET VOC.EHET NPOINT NFU5 SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
201 NORTHERN STATES POO 07 1488.00 21600 18000 00122 1
202 MINNESOTA CORN PROCESSORS 33.00 1071 570 68 34 441 49
203 MINNEGASCO ENERGY CENTER 102.00 1634 . 0 0 I 0 2 35
204 GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION 0.00 0 -4 33 -2 105 33
205 CHEF REDOY FOODS MINNESOTA 43.80 438 . 0 0 1 0 2 49
206 AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR 51.44 0000203 49
STATE 1718.24 24743 18566 101 32 10 6
EPA_R£G»5 STATE=OH
OBS SRC-NAME Ptt-ENET SO-ENET NO-BET CO-ENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRC-DESC SRC-TYPE
207 COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CO 0.00 0.0 724.3 228.4 33.40 702 33
208 CONOCO INCORPORATED 58.00 156.0 145.0 12.0 5.00 3 24 1 20
209 COLUMBUS i SOUTHERN OHIO ELEC 249.00 2267.0 1250.0 495.0 3.35 4 1 1 1
210 STONE CONTAINER CORP 121.60 139.9 380.7 425.4 .122 3
211 STANDARD OIL COMPANY 181.00 3432.0 1432.0 716.0 0.00 4 ' 8 2 13
212 SHELL OIL COMPANY 13.00 0.5 278.0 15.0 3.68 1 0 2 40
213 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 24.80 676.0 465.0 67.7 2.40 f 3 2 1
214 LIMA ARMY TANK CENTER 20.00 1083.0 428.0 57.0 29.00 202 24
215 EMERY INDUSTRIES 9.12 243.2 91.2 5.9 102 23
216 COLUMBUaSOUTHERN OHIO ELEC 249.00 2267.0 1250.0 495.0 8.35 4 1 1 1
217 STANDARD OIL COMPANY 19.00 32.5 203.7 21.5 20.70 593 13
218 THE TIMKEN COMPANY 120.00 8.5 572.2 540.3 1.50 39 4 1 6
STATE 1064.52 10305.6 7220.1 3079.2 112.38 77 52
EPAJEG=5 STATE=WI
OBS SRC-NAME PM-ENET 30-ENET NO-ENET CO.ENET VOC.ENET NPOINT NHJG SRC.DESC SRC.TYPE
219 FLAMBEAU PAPER CO 62.00 -2223.0 369.0 1014.0 0.00 1 5 2 3
220 APPLETON PAPERS, INC. 111.70 1218.2 341.9 -111.7 39.00 112 3
221 PROCTORItGAMBLE PAPER PRODUCTS CO 26.70 27.2 177.0 59.0 9.60 1 12 42
STATE 200.40 -977.6 1387.9 1184.7 48.60 3 7
EPA.REG 5139.38 78809.6 57314.2 17873.5 644.94 225 123
A-8
-------
EPAJ£G*6 STATE=AR
CBS SRCLNMC
222 INTERNATIONAL PAPER
223 ETSI PIPELINE
224 ETSI PIPELINE
225 YORK HANOVER SEAMLESS TUBES
226 GEORGIA PACIFIC
227 INTERNATIONAL PAPER
STATE
PILENET SONNET NLENFT OLENET VOC.ENET WPOINT NFUD SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
332
290
370
167
3712
307
0
2560
2560
0
3012
3592
0
1460
1460
197
27
2102
1752
135
135
95
214
0
0
0
0
85
0
0
5
10
10
5
2
1
1
15
15
12
0
5
2
1
5
1
5
2
42
2
2
22
3
3
5178 11724 5246 2331
85
33 48
EPA_REG=4 STATED
DBS SRC.NAHE
223 CONOCO
229 TEXACO
230 CONOCO
231 TENNECO
232 HILL PETROLEUH
233 TIFTON ALUMINUM CO.
234 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPELINE
235 TEXACO INC.
236 TEXACO INC.
237 INTERNATIONAL PAPER
238 DOM CHEMICAL
239 SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS
240 CLARK OIL CO
241 CALCASIEU REFINING
242 LA POWER i LIGHT
243 LAKE CHARLES REFINE
244 REYNOLDS METAL CO
245 CONTINENTAL FOREST IND.
246 HILL PETROLEUM CO
247 CRYSTAL OIL COMPANY
248 DOM CHEMICAL CO USA
249 GULF STATES UTILITIES
250 GULF STATES UTILITIES
251 SHEPCO
STATE
PM.ENET SO.ENET NO.ENET OLENET VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
5.1
-347.0
5.3
-188.4
142.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.0
9.0
0.0
0.0
14.6
3363.0
0.0
193.0
-1465.0
8.2
0.2
18.0
780.0
1477.0
3920.0
171
-999
26
-4
1640
0
0
0
0
470
0
0
219
-17
33262
975
9707
3661
22
580
2742
'2592
9102
53778
122
-31
126
-9
1249
4
130
155
154
1172
4632
100
1
175
45832
435
423
4578
138
3
10
3171
5612
35855
17.2
149.0
17.9
516.6
1301.9
0.7
62.1
154.5
154.4
423.0
1254.0
86.6
0.1
22.3
4736.0
67.7
0.0
210.0
14.0
0.1
0.0
1892.0
414.0
4993.0
0.00
556.00
0.00
0.00
602.30
364.40
16.75
31.00
31.00
438.00
4.40
0.29
39.00
90.00
17.10
0.00
71.00
2.48
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
50.00
5
17
6
44
23
8
1
3
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
9
2
2
2
1
2
2
5
2
0
0
0
.0
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
20
6
5
5
5
5
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
5
1
5
5
6
2
4
6
2
5
1
13
13
13
13
13
22
33
33
33
3
23
33
13
13
1
13
16
3
13
44
23
1
1
1
8450.0 172927 104037 16487.1 2313.75 148 31
EFA_REG=6 STATE=NM
DBS SRCJWME PILENET SO.ENET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRC.OESC SRC.TYPE
2^2 SOUTHERN UNION REFINING 118.4 1354 546.1 37.3 -1025 14 0 5 13
A-9
-------
STATE=«
08S SRCJW6 PtLEMET SOlENET NO-ENET OLENET VOC-EJCT NPOINT NFUG SRCJ3ESC SRC-TYPE
253 UNITED GAS PIPELINE CO 10.6 0.4 2558.0 634.0 235.0 601 33
254 UNITED GAS PIPELINE CO 12.4 0.5 2984.0 739.0 224.0 701 33
255 FT HOWARD PAPER CO 247.0 3005.0 1771.0 149.0 43.0 205 42
256 UNION TEXAS PETR. 0.0 0.0 201.2 202.0 4.0 2 0 2 33
257 OKLAHOMA GAS i ELEC. 1511.121251.822995.0 2943.4 30.7 2 8 2 1
258 ALLIED MATERIALS CORP. 45.0 267.0 71.0 25.0 5.0 10 2 13
259 UNION TEXAS PETR. 0.0 0.0 428.0 344.0 0.6 7 0 2 44
260 ARCO C&G 0.0 3.9 331.2 30.8 15.0 102 1
261 MESA PETROLEUM CO. 0.5 4398.0 7.3 0.5 0.0 1 0 1 44
262 GRAfC RIVER DAM AUTN. 200.0 13918.0 11598.0 1255.0 13.0 102 1
STATE 2026.6 42849.6 42944.7 6322.7 570.3 30 8
EHA_REG=6 STATE=TX
0*3 SRCJWC PM.ENET SLENET NO.ENET OLENET VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRC.DESC SRC.TYPE
2M GULF STATES OIL 4 REFINING 101.00 578.6 921.7 98 448.2 18 I 5 13
264 B.F. GOODRICH CO. 70.80 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 42 0 3 23
265 AMOCO OIL 15.30 776.6 366.7 52 9.2 11 0 5 13
266 AIRCO INC 23.40 357.5 198.5 14 72.9 411 46
267 VALERO GATHERING CO 0.00 852.9 26.1 21 3.0 2 0 5 44
268 OCIICAL LINE INC. 65.70 223.3 328.5 219 0.0 1 0 5 14
269 CHAHPLIN PETROLEUM CO. 23.40 150.4 369.6 42 169.3 902 13
270 ST. REGIS PAPER CO. -487.20 635.4 54.9 -1713 0.0 2 0 5 3
271 RED RIVER PIPELINE CORP. 0.00 0.0 348.0 104 32.0 5 0 1 33
272 BADISCHE CORP. 0.00 0.0 105.0 16 4.0 1 0 2 23
273 L & B OIL CO INC 0.00 531.6 1.1 5 0.0 1 0 1 44
274 AMOCO CHEMICALS CORP. 5.40 0.2 73.9 7 22.5 2 0 3 23
275 INEXCO OIL CO. 0.00 726.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0 1 44
276 GETTY OIL CO. 1.40 298.0 16.6 2 7.3 1 0 1 44
277 M.R. EDUARDS JR. OIL i GAS 0.43 323.3 7.6 1 0.1 2 0 2 44
275 AIR PRODUCTS AW) CHEMICALS INC 0.00 2.0 329.0 1980 0.0 1 0 3 23
279 AMERADA HESS CORP. 0.00 1016.0 0.0 0 0.0 205 17
280 CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT 42.00 904.0 516.0 57 33.0 2 0 2 1
281 GOODYEAR TIRE AW) RUBBER CO. 16.00 605.0 175.0 40 10.0 302 40
282 CABOT CORP. 0.00 171.3 0.0 -19000 0.0 1 0 2 18
283 TEXAS EASTMAN CO. 41.60 17.2 141.0 17 5.7 1 0 2 23
284 MITCHELL ENERGY PRODUCTION 0.00 0.0 1.1 3900 0.0 1 0 1 23
285 POGO PRODUCING CO 0.48 328.8 11.2 85 0.3 6 0 1 44
286 LIQUID ENERGY CORP. 0.00 0.0 154.5 77 14.4 205 44
287 LIQUID ENERGY CORP. 0.00 0.0 513.5 132 87.2 701 44
288 ANHEUSER-BUSCH 88.50 786.8 345.1 41 3.5 3 0 2 52
289 J.M. HUBER CORP. . 5844.7 . ..504 18
290 WARREN PETROLEUM CO. 0.00 0.0 239.7 81 25.5 6 1 2 44
291 BAYOU CONGENERATIO 201.60 548.8 5712.0 424 0.0 4 0 1 1
292 HOUSTON PIPELINE CO. 0.00 0.0 736.0 41 4.0 6 0 5 33
293 CAPITOL COGENERATION CO LTD. 124.30 1338.0 6651.0 1211 27.6 301 l
294 AMERICAN PETROFINA CO. 6.00 15.0 66.0 9 0.5 102 13
295 CO GEN LYONDELL 306.50 38.5 7970.0 2520 0.0 5 0 1 l
296 AMERICAN PETROFINA CO. 175.30 -1831.0 1335.0 182 0.0 8 1 5 13
A-10
-------
EPA.REG-6 STATE=TX
DBS SRCJWC
297 DARENCO INC
298 PRODUCTION OPERATORS INC
299 SUPERIOR OIL CO.
300 HID PLAINS PIPELINE CO.
301 APPLIED ENERGY SERVICES
302 OASIS PIPE LINE CO.
303 EL PASO HYDROCARBONS CO
304 TEHPLE-EASTEX INC.
305 MARATHON OIL CO.
306USGYPSUIN
307 TEXAS EASTMAN
308 CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM
309 SHELL OIL CO.
310 SHELL OIL CO.
311 H L t P
312 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
313 PANHANDLE EASTERN
314 SUPERIOR OIL CO.
315 PIONEER GAS
316 CENTRAL POWER it LIGHT
317 AMOCO CHEMICAL
318 FRIENDSUOOD REFINING
319 INDEPENDENT REFINING
320 WEST TEXAS UTILITIES CO
321 SWEPCO
322 MONSANTO
323 CHAHPLIN PETR
324 CENTRAL POWER & LITE
' 325 ELGIN-BUTLER BRICK
326 CONTINENTAL CARBON
327 DAL-TEX CEMENT CO
328 COLUMBIAN CHEMICALS CO
329 RED RIVER AFJMY DEP.
330 KIRBY FOREST INDUSTRIES
331 DOW CHEMICAL
332 POWER RESOURCE SYSTEMS OF TEXAS
333 CHEMICAL LIME INC
334 SHINTECH INC
335 SOLANO GAS PROCESSING INC
336 LUFXIN IND
337 INDEPENDENT REFINING
STATE
EPA.REG
PtLENET SQ.ENET NO-£NCT OLENET VOCJNET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
.
0.0
1.3
0.0
3.3
.
-5.6
210.3
4.1
-775.8
167.0
0.0
16.7
.
2077.0
0.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0
1274.0
13.1
94.2
13.5
1218.0
1792.0
1.0
0.0
44.0
124.7
-28.4
536.8
0.0
71.1
963.3
17.5
35.2
83.3
7.3
0.0
-5.7
109.0
8884.6
24657.5
852
1213
427
356
6430
,
0
149
-174
2
118
732
.
222
56756
1
0
802
0
11552
7
276
29
14934
35872
50
0
1068
500
213
5230
1660
. 795
5066
47
7
105
0
1680
1
519
162786
391641
1
82
94
98
4999
159
547
-474
222
300
958
463
216
41330
501
86
-1
187
14812
775
570
120
14518
35840
10
750
526
6
0
374
59
462
2085
210
3504
329
0
3
0
144
153127
305900
0
241
10
13
354
96
38
1527
92
200
137
0
19
26
7656
192
43
6
93
1863
91
785
18
1945
5694
1
699
30
0
-27924
.
-68218
52
681
30
1224
219
0
0
246
706
-80450
-55222
,
0.0
16.7
0.0
8.1
29.3
70.3
98.4
26.8
8.6
-1126.0
0.0
3.0
76.2
26.1
7.0
38.8
4.7
19.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
22.0
57.0
1.0
11.2
16.0
0.0
-113.4
.
-3085.0
0.0
50.5
5.3
45.6
0.0
210.0
0.0
0.0
314.0
-2172.1
-223.1
2
7
8
3
I
3
4
1
11
1
10
9
4
1
2
4
1
1
4
1
3
8
7
1
i
±
1
7
2
5
5
29
10
3
15
2
8
4
1
1
1
3
365
590
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
6
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
36
173
1
1
5
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
3
5
5
5
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
1
1
3
5
2
4
2
1
6
2
1
5
1
1
3
1
5
5
44
23
44
44
1
33
44
3
44
14
23
13
44
44
1
44
33
44
44
1
23
13
13
1
11
23
44
1
48
18
4
18
35
3
13
1
14
23
44
22
13
A-ll
-------
EPOEG-7 STATE=IA
OBS SRCJWC PltlNET SQLBCT N(L£NET CQ_£NET VGC.ENET NPOIHT NRJG SRCJX SRC-TYPE
338 A E STALEY 0.0 2103 346 0.0 65.0 2 0 2 49
339 BOONE VALLEY CO-OP 0.0 2567 1052 0.0 395.0 405 49
340 RQNSANTO 34.0 1281 394 57.0 28.5 1 2 2 23
341 CONSOLIDATED BOGY 58.0 991 296 24.8 115.0 451 23
342 IOWA ELECTRIC RAM) L. 1015.0 8664 14760 1750.0 130.0 161 1
343 BOLER BROS. 57.7 991 340 . 77.0 5 8 1 49
STATE 1164.7 16597 17688 1831.8 1310.5 17 21
EPA_REG=7 STATE=KS
OBS SRC-NA* PtlfNET SONNET SO.ENET CO_Ef£T VOLENET NPOINT NFUG SRC_ESC SRC.TYPE
344 VULCAN MAT'LS 1.0 2 725 200.0 0102 23
345 NAT'L COOPERATIVE REFINERY ASS'N 3.6 -5986 200 28.5 78 305 13
346 CITY OF BELOIT 0.0 200 1020 360.0 24 1 0 2 36
347 CITY OF AUGUSTA 0.0 200 1200 360.0 0102 36
348 COLO. INTERSTATE GAS 0.0 0 655 114.0 11402 33
349 PANHANDLE EASTERN 0.0 0 494 216.0 25 2 0 2 33
STATE 4.6 -5584 4294 1278.5 138 12 0
EF'OEG=7 STATED
OBS SRC-NAHE P1LENET SO-ENET NO.ENET OLENET VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
350 fWLLINCKKOOT 15 1008 282 41 -106 1 0 2 23
EfA_R£G=7 STATE=t
OBS SRCJWC Ptt^NET SO.ENET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOILENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESiJ SRC-TYPE
351 NEBR ALCOHOL FUELS 16.2 337 145 35.7 19.8 101 49
EPA_fl£G 1200.5 12358 22409 3187.0 1362.3 31 21
Ef'A_REG=8 STATE=CO
OBS SRC-NAfE FTLENET SO-ENET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC-TYPE
352 PANHANDLE EASTERN 0.0 0.0 238.8 73.8 16.1 102 33
353 NORTHWEST PIPELINE 0.0 0.0 148.7 24.9 -101.8 202 44
354 GARY WESTERN CO. 20.0 19.0 106.0 33.0 230.0 6 19 5 13
355 CATteJRAL BLUFF OIL SHALE 180.0 481.0 997.0 191.0 72.0 10 11 5 20
356 RIO BLANCO OIL SHALE 282.9 121.3 339.2 97.3 5 26 1 20
STATE 482.9 621.3 2329.7 420.0 216.3 24 56
A-12
-------
EPAJEO* STATE=HT
DBS SRCJWe PHLENEF SOLENET NO-ENET CO-DCT VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
357 PETRO GATHERING SYSTEMS 0.2 966 3.46 0.34 0.06 1 0 1 44
358 CONTINENTAL LI* 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3 1 14
STATE 0.2 964 3.46 0.34 0.06 2 3
STATED
OBS SRC-NA* PH-BCr SO.ENET NO-0CT CORNET VOC.ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
359 MOUNTAIN FUEL RESOURCES 0.0 0.0 -1710.0 144.00 195.00 402 33
360 CHEVRON RESEARCH CO. 38.4 12.0 88.9 91.30 4.50 12 0 I 20
361 TOSCO DEVELOPMENT CCRP 1224.0 905.0 7585.0 33.00 1768.00 30 1 1 13
STATE 1262.4 917.0 5963.9 318.30 1967.50 46 1
EPAJEO 1745.5 2504.3 8297.1 738.64 2183.86 72 60
EP(LREG=9 STATE=AZ
OBS SRC.NAHE PtLE>CT SO-EfT NO^ET CORNET VOCJNET OT)INT hFUO SRCJDESC SRC.TYPE
362 IBM 0 22.5 23 0 0 3 0 2 53
EP(LREG=9 STATE=CA
OBS SRCJW PtLENET SO.ENET NO^NET CORNET VX^NET OTIINT NRC SRC.DESC SRC.TYPE
363 SIMPSON PAPER CO 10.5 1.3 403.0 438.0 10.5 202 3
364 GETTY OIL CO. 28.9 25.4 32.3 18.4 25.0 201 33
365 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 1 55
366 AMERICAN FOREST PRODUCTS CO. 21.5 158.3 342.0 197.0 127.0 202 3
367 MOBIL OIL CORP. -26.0 -25.0 832.0 69.2 -168.6 10 0 2 13
368 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.0 1072.0 2100.0 255.0 75.0 20 0 1 1
369 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 11.0 9.7 291.6 98.4 3.7 2 0 2 1
370 PROCTOR i GAHBLE 16.5 278.1 274.1 143.6 33.7 ' 2 0 2 36
371 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 34.6 45.0 125.3 98.9 18.9 202 45
372 SHELL CALIFORNIA PRODUCTION INC. -19.9 -1306.0 -11.0 192.5 -385.3 40 0 4 33
373 CITY OF LOS ANGELES - HYPERION -15.7 -76.1 -96.5 -170.1 -110.5 605 45
374 GENSTAR CEMENT & LIME CO -110.0 160.0 318.0 348.0 3.0 3 1 5 4
375 GETTY OIL CO. 0.0 0.0 0.0 368.0 -1.1 501 33
STATE 101.4 343.2 4660.8 2056.9 -363.7 98 I
STATE=HI
OBS SRCJWC PtLENET SONNET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOC.ENET MPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
376 HAUAI IN INO REFINERY INC 13.6 255.4 311 220.3 10.1 301 13
A-13
-------
EPAJEG-9 STATED
OBS sacjwe pfLoer SOLBST NOLBCT couer VOCJ-NET NPOINT NRJG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
377 NEVADA COBff 137.5 68.8 478.3 25 7.4 3 0 2 4
EPA_REG=9 STATE=PACO
OBS SRC-NAME PtLENET SO-ENET NOJNET OLENET VOC-ENET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
378 VAN Cflf> SEtfOOD CO. 0.4 42.3 84.8 14.5 2.6 1 0 2 48
EPA.REG 252.9 732.2 5557.9 2316.7 -343.6 108 1
EFA_R£G=10 STATE=AK
OBS SRCJWflE fUlNET SONNET NO.ENET OLENET VOCJNET W>OINT fFUJ SRCJESC SRC.TYPE
379 ARCO/SOHIO 210.0 52.0 8305.0 1481.0 27.0 26 0 2' 33
380 CHUOACH ELECT. ASSOC. 96.4 29.0 1138.0 78.8 12.0 102 1
381 CHUGACH ELECT. ASSOC. 57.3 14.5 328.0 57.4 8.7 1 0 2 1
382 m ALASKAN PIPELM CO 422.4 522.0 17911.6 4438.8 1201.2 49 11 1 44
383 ARCO ALASKA INC. 337.0 85.0 14122.0 2789.0 50.5 107 0 2 33
STATE 1123.1 702.5 42304.6 8845.0 1299.4. 184 11
STATE=ID
OBS SRC-NAME PN.ENET SO.ENET NO.ENET CO.ENET VOC.ENET MPOINT NFUG SRC_DESC SRC.TYK
384 CO-GEN INC. 20 30 252 336 72 10 2 24
EI'AJEOIO STATE=OR
OBS SRC.NAWE PIUNET SO.ENET NO^NET OLENET VOC^NET NPOINT NFUG SRCJESC SRC-TYPE
385 HARNEY ELECT. COOP. INC -454 350 638 50 18 20 2 24
386 METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT 34 210 1050 420 36 3 0 1 9
STATE -370 560 1688 470 54 50
A-14
-------
EPA_REG»10 STATED
oss SRCJWE
387 KAISER ALUMINU*
388 WASHINGTON UATER POWER CO.
389 L0 STAR INDUSTRIES
-390 ALCOA AUHINUH CO.
391 PAWttAHA E)RCORP.
392 TACOHA CITY LIGHT
393 U S DEPT. OF NAVY
394 ONEGA FULLS INC.
395 GORGE ENERGY CO.
396 PUGET SON) POWER fc LIGHT
397 LOHGVIEH FIBRE CWANY
PltE«F SOLflCT NO-BCT CO-ENET VOC_ENCT NPOIKT KFUG SRCJESC SRC-TYPE
INC.
-145.0
3001.0
279.0
1146.0
25.0
79.7
-25.0
91.0
53.0
25.0
-206.0
847
20019
1205
921
0
1366
5
513
160
307
-1030
19
55427
1314
0
353
2926
1418
876
482
4122
552
3297
5341
.
0
470
267
73
110
194
1290
1398
-2.0
60.0
0.0
160.0
80.2
268.0
50.0
87.0
9.8
49.0
8
4
2
1
1
1
8
2
1
2
5
0
14
37
0
0
0
2
5
1
1
0
5
1
5
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
5
7
24
4
7
42
1
24
49
35
1
3
STATE
EPA.RE6
2031.7
2804.8
24313 67489
25606 111734
12440 762.0
22091 2187.4
35
225
60
71
68574.2 782516 740200 137874 31072 2054 910
Computer Codes:
EPA_REG = EPA Region
SRC_NAME = Source Name
PM_ENET = PM Net Emission Changes
SO_ENET = S02 Net Emission Changes
NO_ENET = NOx Net Emission Changes
CO_ENET = CO Net Emission Changes
VOC_ENET = VOC Net Emission Changes
NPOINT = Number of Point Sources
NFUG = Number of Fugitive Sources
SRC_DESC = Source Description (See Table B-2)
SRC_TYPE = Source Type (See Table B-2)
A-15
-------
APPENDIX B
CODING SHEETS AND CODE EXPLANATIONS
-------
TABLE B-l. PSD CODING SHEETS
PSD PERMIT DATA
EPA Rtglon:
PSD Permit Issued To: Penilt Ho.:
Company Contact: Application Reviewed By:
Telephont No.: Person or Contact:
Address: __ Telephont Ho.:
Date of Initial Contact: Date PSD Application Submitted:
Dat« Last Information Submitted: Date Application Deemed "Complete":
Date PSD Perilt Issued:
Project Description:
Provide total emissions Increases as originally proposed by applicant for each pollutant (If different from reviewer
estimates).
Pollutant (Ibs/hr) (tons/yr) Pollutant (Ibs/hr) (tons/yr)
PH VOC
SO, Other 1 (specify)
HOX Other 2 (specify)
CO
Was ambient monitoring data provided? Yet Ho If yes, specify for which pollutants and which years:
Specify source of monitor data: Source Sponsored State Network Other (specify)
If no, was a monitoring exemption demonstration provided? Yes No Don't know -
Was PSD application subject to an NSPS or MESHAP? Y«t No If yes, specify subpart or name:
If Information Indicates that an Increment or NAAQS was being approached or violated because of the proposed project,
Investigate and determine 1f corrective action was taken. Check the corrective action taken and provide details.
Emission reduction at proposed units (BACT change) Stack height change
Process change (fuel switch) Orientation of emissions unit changed
Emissions reductions elsewhere at plant __ Hours of operation limitation
Other (specify)
Detail corrective action
If change in site selection of proposed project occurred, specify and provide brief discussion:
Was Federal Land Manager or Governor (or any Federal agency, Including EPA) Involved during review process?
Yes No If yes, provide discussion and copy pertinent correspondence
B-l
-------
Permit Number
A. GENERAL DATA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
RECORD FIELD ALLOCATIONS
Description
EPA Region
Permit Issued to
Permit I
Review performed by (coded)
Permit timing (coded)
Source location - city
county
state
Source type (coded)
Project description (coded)
Subject regulations (coded)
Other pollutants subject (coded)
Pollutant 1
Pollutant 2
Emissions Increases (t/yr)
PM
so2
N0x
CO
voc
Other 1
Other 2
Emission decreases (t/yr)
PH
so2
N0x
CO
voc
Other 1
Other 2
Net Increases (may be negative, t/yr)
PM
S0
Answer
CO
voc
Other 1
Other 2
B-2
-------
14 Number of point sources permitted
15 Number of fugitive sources permitted
16 Pollutants subject to PSD or Non/Att Review (coded)
PH
so2
NOX
CO
VOC
Other 1
Other 2
17 Were pollutants modelled (coded)
PM
so2
N0x
CO
VOC
Other 1
Other 2
18 If not modelled, why not? (coded)
PM
so2
N0x
CO
VOC
Other 1
Other 2
19 Ambient monitoring provided (coded)
20 Source of monitoring data (coded)
21 Years of metorologlcal data modelled (coded)
22 Cause of permitting bottleneck (coded)
23 Application subject to NSPS or NESHAPS (coded)
24 Distance to nearest Class I area (coded)
B. AIR QUALITY DATA
PH - 24hr
25 Max. downwind Impact
26 Max. Increment consumed In Impact area
27 X allowable
28 Applicants contribution to max. Impact
29 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
30 Applicants contribution at point of max.
B-3
-------
PM - annual
31 Max. downwTnd Impact
32 Max. Increment consumed In Impact area
33 < allowable
34 Applicants contribution to max. Impact
35 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
36 Applicants contribution at point of max.
SO, - 3hr
37 HaX. downwind Impact
38 Max. Increment consumed 1n Impact area
39 % allowable
40 Applicants contribution to max. Impact
41 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
42 Applicants contribution at point of max.
SO, - 24hr
43 Max. downwind Impact
44 Max. Increment consumed In Impact area
45 % allowable
46 Applicants contribution to max. Impact
47 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
48 Applicants contribution at point of max.
SO, annual
49 MaX. downwind Impact
50 Max. Increment consumed 1n Impact area
51 % allowable
52 Applicants contribution to max. Impact
53 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
54 Applicants contribution at point of max.
NO - annual
55 MaxY downwind Impact
56 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
57 Applicants contribution at point of max.
CO - Ihr
58 Max. downwind Impact
59 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
60 Applicants contribution at point of max.
CO - 8hr
61 Max. downwind Impact
62 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
63 Applicants contribution at point of max.
B-4
-------
voc
64 Averaging period (coded)
65 Max. downwind Impact
66 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
67 Applicants contribution at point of max.
Other 1
68 Averaging period (coded)
69 Max. downwind impact
70 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
71 Applicants contribution at point of max.
Other 2
72 Averaging period (coded)
73 Max. downwind Impact
74 Max. ambient pollutant concentration predicted
75 Applicants contribution at point of max.
76 Fugitive PM modelled (coded)
77 Particle size distribution allowance (coded)
78 Corrective Action (coded)
79 Highest or second highest (coded)
C. CONTROL TECHNOLOGY DATA
80 Number of emission units (number of
repetitive blocks to this section)
B-5
-------
DO NOT KEYPUNCH THIS AREA
PERMIT NO.
80-A
80-B
80-C
80-D
80-E
80-F
80-G
80-H
80-1
80-J
80-K
80-L
Initial Contact Date:
Application Submittal Date:
Last Info. Submittal Date:
Permit Issuance Date:
Completeness Date:
B-6
-------
Permit No.:
Emission Unit No.:
Unit Description (i.e., boiler, incinerator, etc.):
Stack Parameters: Stack height Stack gas exit temperature
Stack diameter Stack gas exit velocity
If unit is subject to NSPS or NESHAP, specify subpart or name:
If combustion unit, indicate fuel fired by providing fuel sulfur and ash content.
Fuel % Sulfur X Ash Fuel % Sulfur X Ash
Oil Combination (specify fuels)
Coal
Wood Other (specify)
If there is a permit limit on the operation schedule (i.e., hrs/hr, hrs/day, etc.),
specify:
Identify control strategies (including BAC.T and alternatives) and incremental cost
effectiveness (ICE) of controls as calculated by applicant and reviewer. (NOTE: ICE =
$/ton of pollutant removed beyond base case (level required to achieve NSPS or SIP, as
applicable). If ICE is not provided, make note of any information on cost of control(s).
Pollutant - ICE <*/ton> - Alternative - ICE
(specify) BACT Applicant Reviewer Controls Applicant Reviewer
B-7
-------
EMISSION UNIT NO. 1
Size or .Capacity
81 Size or capacity value
(1n NSPS units 1f applicable)
82 Size exemption of applicable NSPS
(In NSPS units)
83 Unit of size or capacity (In applicable
NSPS units) (coded)
84 Type of facility (coded)
85 New or modified facility (coded)
Fuel Used
86 Type (coded)
87 XS
88 X Ash
Emissions Increases or Decreases
89 PM Ib/hr
90 T/yr
91 BACT determination
92 No. of control alterantlves considered
93 Subject to *NSPS (coded)
94 Allowable NSPS emissions (1n NSPS units)
95 Equivalent BACT allowable emissions
(1n NSPS units)
96 Unit of NSPS or BACT emissions (coded)
97 SOg Ib/hr
98 T/yr
99 BACT determination
100 No. of control alterantlves considered
101 Subject to NSPS (coded)
102 Allowable NSPS emission (in NSPS units)
103 Equivalent BACT allowable emissions
(in NSPS units)
104 Unit of NSPS or BACT emissions (coded)
105 Np^ Ib/hr
106 T/yr
107 BACT determination
108 No. of control alternatives considered
109 Subject to NSPS (coded)
110 Allowable NSPS emissions (1n NSPS units)
111 Equivalent BACT allowable emissions
(1n NSPS units)
112 Unit of NSPS or BACT emissions (coded)
B-8
-------
113 CO Ib/hr
114 T/yr
115 BACT determination
116 No. of control alternatives considered
117 Subject to NSPS (coded)
118 Allowable NSPS emissions (1n NSPS units)
119 Equivalent BACT allowable emissions
(1n NSPS units)
120 Unit of NSPS or BACT emissions (coded)
121 VOC Ib/hr
122 T/yr
123 BACT determination
124 No. of control alternatives considered
125 Subject to NSPS (coded)
126 Allowable NSPS emissions (In NSPS units)
127 Equivalent BACT allowable emissions
(1n NSPS units)
128 Unit of NSpS or BACT emissions (coded)
129 Other 1 Ib/hr
130 T/yr
131 BACT determination
132. No. of control alterantlves considered
133 Subject to NSPS (coded)
134 Allowable NSPS emissions (1n NSPS units)
135 Equivalent BACT allowable emissions
(1n NSPS units)
136 Unit of NSPS or BACT emissions (coded)
137 Other 2 Ib/hr
138 T/yr
139 BACT determination
140 No. of control alternatives considered
141 Subject to NSPS (coded)
142 Allowable NSPS emissions (In NSPS units)
143 Equivalent BACT allowable emissions
(In NSPS units)
144 Unit of NSPS or BACT emissions (coded)
145 Opacity %
Repeat for tach Unit
B-9
-------
DO NOT KEYPUNCH THIS AREA
PERMIT NO.
EMISSION UNIT NO.
146 Unit Classification Code
147 Stack Height (m)
148 Stack Diameter (m)
149 Stack Gas Exit Temperature (°K)
150 Stack Gas Exit Velocity (m/sec)
B-10
-------
DO NOT KEYPUNCH THIS AREA
PERMIT NO.
EMISSION UNIT NO.
151 PM
152
153
154
155 PM
156
157
158
159 SO,
160
161
162
163 -SO,
164
165
166
167 NO.
168
169
170
171 NO^
172
173
174
175 C0_
176
177
178
179 C0_
180
181
182
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. (S/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative"
Control Alternative
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
B-ll
-------
DO NOT KEYPUNCH THIS AREA
PERMIT NO.
EMISSION UNIT NO.
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
VOC
VOC
Other 1
Other 1
Other 2
Other 2
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff.
Incremental Cost Eff.
Control Alternative _
Control Alternative _
Control Alternative _
Control Alternative
($/ton)
($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Control Alternative
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
Incremental Cost Eff. ($/ton)
B-12
-------
TABLE B-2. CODES USED IN PSD DATA BASE
Question Number
4 Review Performed by:
0 = Unknown
1 = EPA
2 = State
3 = Contractor
4 = EPA/Federal Land Manager Involvement
5 = State/Federal Land Manager Involvement or EPA
6 = Contractor/Federal Land Manager Involvement or EPA
7 = County
5 Permit Timing:
0 = Unknown
1 = Date Application submitted to last information
submitted less than 6 months and to final permit
issued less than 9 months.
2 = Date application submitted to last information
submitted less than 6 months and to final permit
issued greater than 9 months.
3 = Date application submitted to last information
submitted greater than 6 months and to final
permit greater than 9 months.
4 = Date application submitted to last information
submitted greater than 6 months and to final
permit less than 9 months.
5 - Permit not yet issued.
7 Source Type":
1 = Electric plants greater than 250 MM BTU/hr heat
input
2 = Coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers)
3 = Kraft pulp mills
4 = Portland cement plants
5 = Primary zinc smelters
6 = Iron and steel mills
7 = Primary aluminum ore reduction plants
8 = Primary copper smelters
9 = Municipal incinerators capable of charging more
than 250 tons of refuse per day
10 = Hydrofluoric acid plants
11 = Sulfuric acid plants
12 = Nitric acid plants
B-13
-------
Question Number
(Continued)
TABLE B-2. CODES USED IN PSD DATA BASE
13 = Petroleum refineries
14 = Lime plants
15 = Phosphate rock processing plants
16 = Coke oven batteries
17 = Sulfur recovery plants
18 = Carbon black plants (furnace process)
19 = Primary lead smelters
20 = Fuel conversion plants
21 = Sintering plants
22 = Secondary metal production plants
23 = Chemical process plants
24 = Fossil fuel boilers (or combination thereof)
greater than 250 MM BTU/hr heat input
25 = Petroleum storage and transfer units with a total
storage capacity greater than 300,000 barrels
26 = Taconite ore processing plants
27 = Glass fiber processing plants
28 = Charcoal production plants
29 = Coal mining
30 = Iron ore mining
31 = Stone quarry
32 = Other mining
33 = Natural gas and crude oil pumping stations
34 = Municipal incinerators capable of charging less
than 250 tons of refuse per day
35 = Fossil fuel-fired boilers less than 250 MM BTU/hr
heat input
36 = Electric plants less than 250 MM BTU/hr heat
Input
37 = Petroleum storage and transfer units with a total
storage capacity less than 300,000 barrels
38 = Asphalt production plants
39 = Miscellaneous petroleum product production
(greases, waste oil processing, etc.)
40 = Rubber and plastic production plants
41 = Textile manufacturing
42 = Lumber and wood products manufacturing
43 - Agricultural chemical production
(fertilizers, pesticides, etc.)
44 = Natural gas processing plant
45 = Solid waste reclamation
46 = Graphite electrode plant
47 = Automotive part manufacturing
48 = Kaolin processing
49 = Food processing
50 = Printing plant
B-14
-------
Question Number
(Continued)
10
16
17
TABLE B-2. CODES USED IN PSD DATA BASE
51 = Salt manufacturing
52 = Brewery
53 = Computer manufacturing
54 = Glass manufacturing
55 = Geothermal power steam electric plant
56 = Appliance coating
Project Description:
1 = New
2 = Modified* additional combustion units added
3 = Modified* additional processing units added
4 = Modified, fuel switch
5 = 2, 3 above
6 = 2, 3> 4 above
7 = 2, 4 above
8 = Modified, process change
Subject Regulations:
0 = Not applicable
1 = 1978 Regulations
2 = 1980 Regulations
Other Pollutants Covered:
0 = Not subject
1 = Lead
2 = Asbestos
3 = Beryllium
4 = Mercury
'5 = Vinyl chloride
6 = Fluorides
7 = Sulfuric acid mist
8 = Total reduced sulfur (including H?S)
9 = Reduced sulfur (including H2S)
10 = Hydrogen sulfide
11 = Other
12 = 1, 3, 4, 6
13 - 1, 2, 3, 4
0 = Not subject
1 = PSD
2 = Nonattainment Review
1 = Yes
2 - Mo
B-15
-------
TABLE B-2. CODES USED IN PSD DATA BASE
Question Number
18 0 = Not subject or was modeled
1 = Insignificant Increase in emissions to cause
downwind impact (modeling was required)
2 = Non-attainment area construction
3 = Less than 50 tons per year increase under
1978 regulations
4 = Oversight
5 = Unknown
19 0 = Unknown
1 = Yes
2 = No
20 0 = None was provided or unknown
1 = Source sponsored
2 = State network
3 = Other
4 = 1 and 2
1 =1 year
2 = Greater than 1 year less than 5 years
3 = Greater than or equal to 5 years
22 0 = No bottleneck occurred
1 = Monitoring data required
2 = Applicability determination concerns
3 = BACT analysis concerns
4 = Increment analysis concerns
5 = NAAQS analysis concerns
6 = Class I area impact concerns
7 = Additional impact analysis concerns
8 = Application found complete in less than
6 months* EPA lag time in processing application
caused bottleneck
9 = Other
10 = Unknown
23 1 = Yes
2 = No
24 0 = Unknown
1 = Less than 50 kilometers
2 = Greater than or equal to 50 kilometers less
than 100 kilometers
3 = Greater than or equal to 100 kilometers
64, 68* 72 1 - 1-hour average
2 = 3-hour average
B-16
-------
TABLE B-2. CODES USED IN PSD DATA BASE
,tion Number
3 = 8-hour average
4 = 24-hour average
5 = Annual average
6 = 3 month average
76 0 = Unknown
1 = Yes
2 = No
77 0 = Unknown
1 = Yes
2 = No
78 0 = No corrective action (less than 85% increment
consumed) or unknown
1 = Emission reduction at proposed units (BACT
change)
2 = Stack height change
3 = Process change (fuel switch)
4 = Orientation of emissions units changed
5 = Emissions reductions elsewhere at plant
6 = Hours of operation limitation
7 = Other
79 0 = No modeling occurred or unknown
1 = Highest
2 = Second highest
83 0 = Mot applicable (process unit* etc.)
1 = MM BTU/hr heat input
2- = Tons/hour
3 = SCFM input
4 = Tons/day production capacity
5 = Tons/year production capacity
6 = SCFM produced
7 = Gallons/year produced
8 = Other
9 = Barrels/stream day
10 = Horse power
84 1 = Combustion
2 = Process
3 = Both
85 1 New
2 Modified
B-17
-------
TABLE B-2. CODES USED IN PSD DATA BASE
Question Number
86 1 Gas
2 = Liquid
3 = Solid
4 = Combination
93, 101, 117, 1 = Yes
125 2 = No
96, 104, 112, 0 = Not applicable
120, 128, 1 Ib/MM BTU
136, 144 2 = gr/dscf (g/hp-hr for FF units)
3 = ppm (volume %)
4 = Ib/ton produced
5 = lb/1000 Ib coke burnoff
6 = opacity, Ibs/gal or kg/1
B-18
-------
CO
UJ
o
o
o
<:
o
to
CO
_
o
Q
CO
CL
ro
I
CD
CO
B-19
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
(Industrial Boilers)
01 Boiler
02 Material Handling
03 Fluidized Bed Combustion
04 Waste Heat Boiler
05 Dryer/non-contact
en
I
IN3
o
00 Unknown
01 Anthracite Coal
02 Bituminous or Subbitumnous Coal
03 Lignite
04 Coal (type unknown)
05 Fuel oil
06 Natural gas
07 Wood/Bark
08 Coke
09 Bagasse
10 None, Process Only
11 Solid Fuel Combination
12 Liquid/Solid Combination
13 Gas/Oil
14 Gas/Oil/Solid
15 Solid/Gas
16 Refinery Gas
17 Natural Gas/Waste Gas
18 Waste Gas
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
Da
(Utility Boilers)
01 Boiler
02 Material Handling
DO
i
ro
00 Unknown
01 Anthracite Coal
02 Bituminous or Subbituminous Coal
03 Lignite
04 Coal (type unknown)
05 Fuel Oil
06 Natural Gas
07 Wood/Bark
08 Coke
09 Bagasse
10 None, Process Only
11 Solid Fuel Combination
12 Liquid/Solid Combination
13 Liquid/Gas
14 Gas/On/Sol1d
15 Solid/Gas
(Incinerators burning
solid waste which 1s
at least 50% municipal)
01 Incinerator
02 Material Handling
Auxill1ary Fuel
00 Unknown
01 None
02 Fuel 011
03 Natural Gas
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
(Portland Cc-nunt Plants)
01 Kiln
02 Clinker Cooler
03 Raw Mill System
04 Finish Mill System
05 Raw Mill Dryer
06 Raw Material Storage
07 Conveyor Transfer Point
08 Loading System
09 Unloading System
10 03 thru 09
11 Quarry Facilities
12 Crushing System
13 Heaters
14 Miscellaneous Fugitives
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
04 Coal/Coke
(Nitric Acid Plants)
01 Nitric Acid
Production Units
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
(Sulfuric Acid Plants)
01 Sulfuric Acid
Production Units
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
(Asphalt Concrete Plants)
01 Dryer
02 Asphalt Batch Plant
03 Material Handling
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
04 Oil/Gas
CO
I
ro
to
(Petroleum Refineries)
01 FCCU Catalyst Regenerator
02 Fuel Gas Combustion Devices
03 Claus Sulfur Recovery Unit
04 Flare/Incinerator
05 Miscellaneous Fugitives
06 API Separator
07 Flue Gas Cooler
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
04 Fuel Gas
05 011/Gas Combination
06 Combination Solid
07 Refinery Gas
08 Wood
K
(Storage Vessels for
petroleum 1iquids
built after 6/11/73
and before 5/19/78)
01 Storage Tank
00 Unknown
01 Gasoline
02 Crude 011
03 Fuel Oil
04 Other
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
Ka
(Storage Vessels for
petroleum liquids
built after 5/18/78)
01 Storage Tank
00 Unknown
01 Gasoline
02 Crude 011
03 Fuel 011
04 Other
oo (Secondary lead smelter)
01 Pot Furnace
02 Blast Furnace
03 Reverbatory Furnace
00 Unknown
01 None* Process Only
02 Coke
03 Fuel 011
04 Natural Gas
M
(Secondary Brass and
Bronze Ingot Production
Plants)
01 Reverbatory Furnace
02 Electric Furnace
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Gas
(Iron and Steel Plants)
01 Basic Oxygen Process
Furnace (BOPF)
02 Cupola Furnace
03 Material Handling
00 Unknown
01 Coal/Coke
02 None, Process Only
03 011
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
01 Municipal Sludge
Incinerators
(Sewage Treatment Plants)
Aux1lliary Fuel
00 Unknown
01 None
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
CD
ro
on
(Primary Copper Smelters)
01 Dryer
02 Roaster
03 Smelting Furnace
04 Copper Converter
05 Vertical Shaft Furnace
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
Q
(Primary Z1nc Smelters)
01 Roaster
02 Sintering Machine
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
(Primary Lead Smelters)
01 Sintering Machine
02 Blast Furnace
03 Dross Reverbatory Furnace
04 Electric Smelting Furnace
05 Converter
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
ro
i
ro
en
(Primary Aluminum
Reduction Plants)
01 Potroom Group
02 Anode Bake Plants
03 Miscellaneous Support
Facilities
04 Alumina Calciner
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Fuel Oil
04 Other
(Phosphate Fertilizer
Industry: Wet Process
Phosphoric Acid Plants)
01 Reactors
02 Filters
03 Evaporators
04 Hotwells
05 Miscellaneous Handling
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel 011
U
(Phosphate Fertilizer
Industry: Superphosphorlc
Acid Plants)
01 Evaporators
02 Hotwells
03 Add Sumps
04 Cool1ng Tanks
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
(Phosf-hale Fertilizer
Industry: Diamrrionium
Phosphate Plants)
01 Reactor
02 Granulator
03 Dryer
04 Cooler
05 Screen
06 Mill
07 Miscellaneous Handling
00 Unknown
01 None* Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Fuel Oil
04 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil
ro
W
(Phosphate Fertilizer
Industry: Triple
Superphosphate Plants)
01 Mixer
02 Curing Belts (dens)
03 Reactor
04 Granulator
05 Dryer
06 Cooler
07 Screens
08 Mill
09 Storage
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
X
(Phosphate Fertilizer
Industry: Granular
Triple Superphoshate
Storage Facilities)
01 Storage or Curing Piles
02 Conveyors
03 Elevators
04 Screens
05 Mills
00 Unknown
01 None» Process Only
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
(Coal Propdiat ion Plants)
CO
I
oo
01 Breaking
02 Crushing
03 Screening
04 Wet or Dry Cleaning
05 Thermal Drying
06 Coal Conveying
07 Storage Systems
08 Coal Transfer
09 Loading Systems
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Coal
(Ferroalloy Production Plants)
01 Electric Submerged
Arc Furnaces
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
AA
(Steel Plants:
Electric Arc Furnaces)
01 Electric Arc Furnace
02 Dust Handling Equipment
03 Reheat Furnace
04 Lime Storage S1lo
05 Dryer/Heaters
06 Caster
07 Degasser Refiner
08 Hot Scarfer
09 Billet Grinder
10 Tube Mill
11 Sandblast Booth
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Fuel 011
04 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
BB
(Kraft Pulp Mills)
03
I
ro
01 Digester System
02 Brown Stock Washer System
03 Black Liquor Oxidation
System
04 Recovery Furnace
05 Smelt Dissolving Tank
06 Lirne Kiln
07 Condensate System
08 Evaporators
09 Slaker
10 Material Handling
11 TRS Incinerator
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Wood
04 Oil/Gas
CC
(Glass Manufacturing Plants)
01 Glass Melting Furnace
02 Material Handling
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Oil
03 Gas
DD
(Grain Elevators)
01 Truck Loading and
Unloading Stations
02 Barge and Ship Loading
and Unloading Stations
03 Grain Dryers
04 Grain Handling Operations
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
EE
(Surface Coating of
Metal Furniture)
01 Paint Application Area
02 Flash-Off Area
03 Bake Oven Area
04 Paint Sprayer
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
CO
I
CO
o
FF
(Stationary Internal
Combustion Engines)
01 Gas Engines
02 Dual Fuel Engines
03 Diesel Engines
04 Dehydrator
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Diesel Fuel
04 Natural Gas/Diesel Fuel
GG
(Stationary Gas Turbines)
01 Stationary Gas Turbine
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Fuel Oil
04 Gas/Oil
05 Synthetic Gas
06 Refinery Gas
07 Coal
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
HH
(L1me Manufacturing Plants)
01 Kiln
02 Hydrator
03 Crusher/Screen
04 Material Handling
05 L1me Caldner
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
04 Coal
DO
I
00
JJ
(Organic Solvent Cleaners)
01 Cold Cleaners
02 Vapor Degreasers
03 Conveyorized Degreasers
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
KK
(Lead-Acid Battery
Manufacturing Plants)
01 Grid Casting Facility
02 Paste Mixing Facility
03 Three Process Operation
Facility
04 Lead Oxide Manufacturing
Facility
05 Lead Reclamation Facility
06 Other Lead Emitting Operations
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
LL
(Metallic Mineral
Processing Plants)
CD
OJ
rxi
01 Crusher
02 Screens
03 Bucket Elevators
04 Conveyor Belt Transfer Plants
05 Thermal Dryers
06 Product Packaging
07 Storage Bins
08 Enclosed Storage Areas
09 Loading and Unloading
Stations - Truck
10 Loading and Unloading
Stations - Rallcar
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
(Automobile and Light
Duty Truck Surface
Coating Operations)
01 Prime Coat Operation
02 Guide Coat Opeation
03 Top Coat Operation
04 General Coating
05 Body Shop Operation
06 Miscellaneous Fugitives
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
(Phosphate Rock Plants)
01 Dryer
02 Calciner
03 Grinder
04 Ground Rock Hand!ing
and Storage
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Fuel Oil
03 Natural Gas
04 Solid/Liquid Combination
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
00
(Porchl&rcethylene
Dry Cleaning)
01 Dryer
02 Dry-to-Dry Machines
03 Washers
04 Filters
05 Muck Coolers
06 Stills
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
PP
OJ
GO
01 Ammonium Sulfate Dryer
(Ammonium Sulfate Manufacturing)
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
QQ
(Graphic Arts Industry:
Publication Rotogravure
Printing)
01 Rotogravure Printing
Process
02 Thermomechanical
Pulp ing-Newsprint
Production (Not Rotogravure)
03 Offset Presses
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
RR
(Pressure Sensitive Tape
and Label Surface Coating
Operations)
01 Pressure Sensitive Adhesive
Coating Lines
02 Release Coating Lines
03 Precoat Coating Lines
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Gas
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
SS
(Industrial Surface
Coating Appliances)
01 Surface Coating Line
02 Paint Dip Tank
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
CO
00
-p.
TT
(Metal Coil Surface Coating)
01 Metal Coil Surface
Coating Line
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
UU
(Asphalt Roof Manufacturing)
01 Saturators
02 Mineral Handling and
Storage Facilities
03 Asphalt Storage Tanks
04 Blowing Stills
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
VV
(SOCMI Fugitive)
01 Storage
02 Material Handling
03 Process Fugitives
04 Incinerator/Flare
05 Dryer
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
WW
(Beverage Can Surface
Coating Industry)
OJ
en
01 Interior Base Coating
Operations
02 Overvarnish Coating
Operations
03 Inside Spray Coating Operations
04 End Interior Coating Operations
05 End Exterior Coating Operations
06 Enamel Curing
07 General Coating
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
XX
(Bulk Gas Terminals)
01 Loading Racks
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
LLL
(Natural Gas Processing
Plants)
01 Sulfur Recovery Plants
02 Heaters
03 Flare
04 Acid Gas Incinerator
05 Reboiler
06 Compressor Exhaust
07 TEG
08 Regenerator
09 Gas Sweetening Plant
10 Miscellaneous Fugitives
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Process Gas
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
SSS - Shale Oil
SSL - Coal Liquefaction
SSG - Coal Gasification
SST - Geothermal
(Fuel Conversion Plants)
01 Material Handling
02 Crushing/Screening
03 Retort
04 Flare/Incinerator
05 Boiler/Heater
06 Turbine
07 Gasifier
08 S02 Stripper
(Selexol vent)
00 Unknown
01 Gas.
02 Oil
03 Coal
04 None/ Process Only
05 Geothermal
CTl
002
(Kaolin Processing)
01 Rotary Kiln
02 Bauer Mill
03 Dryer
04 Calciner
05 Bin Vent
06 Cooler
07 Sizing/Storage
08 Pneumatic Conveyor
09 Material Handling
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Natural Gas
03 Coal
04 Fuel Oil
05 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil
06 Coal/Oil
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
I
CO
003 01
02
(Chemical Process, Plants) 03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
K1ln (rotary) 00 Unknown
Material Handling 01 None/ Process Only
Reboiler 02 Oil
Flare/Incinerator 03 Gas
Ethanol Production Plant 04 Waste
Storage/Handling 05 Coke
Dryer 06 Oil/Solid
Fermentation 07 Coal
Dehydration System 08 Gas/011
Ethel Stripper
Brine Recovery Unit
Lexan Finishing
Xylenol Production
Noryl Finishing
Electric Arc Furnace
Siloxane Production
Reactor
Benzene Production
Isomerization
Recovery System
Residual Vinyl Chloride Monomer
Detergent Base Making Plant
Methanol Production Plant
Graph it izer
Molybdenum Roaster
Ovens
Purex Plant
U03 Plant
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
004
(Carbon Black Plants)
01 Furnace
02 Waste Heat Bo Her
03 Thermal Unit
04 Thermal Boiler
05 Materials Handling
06 Reactor
07 Coke Oven
08 Dryer
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Oil
03 Liquid
04 Gas
CD
I
CO
co
005
(Food Processing)
01 Preparation
02 Extraction
03 Meal
04 Material Handling/Storage
05 Dryer
06 Carbon Regeneration
07 Heater/Incinerator
00 Unknown
01 None, Process
02 Gas
03 Liquid
Only
006
(Textile Production)
01 Elastic Fiber Extruder
Plant
02 Material Handling
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
-------
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
007
(Wood Products
Manufacturing]
01 Spray Booth
02 Woodwaste Collection
System
03 Rotary Dryer
04 Screening Operations
05 Flaking Operations
06 Veneer Sawing Operations
07 Miscellaneous Operations
08 Furniture Finishing System
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Wood
03 Oil
CO
I
CO
008
(Rubber and Plastic
i
01 General Process
02 Sealant Line
03 General Fugitive
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
Manufacturing)
009
(Brewery)
01 Material Handling
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
010
(Salt Processing Plant)
01 Rotary Dryer
02 Material Handling
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Gas
-------
CO
o
NSR UNIT CLASSIFICATION CODES
SUBPART
EMISSION UNIT
FUEL COMBUSTED OR STORED
Oil
(Mining)
01 Mining
02 Dryer
03 Fugitive/Miscellaneous
Hand!1ng
00 Unknown
01 None, Process Only
02 Oil
03 Gas
-------
APPENDIX C
DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS/BACT EMISSIONS FOR
NAMED AND OTHER PSD SOURCES
-------
TABLE C-l DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS PARTICIPATE
MATTER EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH
ALL SOURCE TYPES IN DATA BASE
REGION I EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X. Subject to NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
Emissions
for Named
PSD Sources
810
166
644
SOX
8,002
1,048
6,954
87X
1.205
213
992
82X
19.125
8.229
10,896
57X
5.117
2.082
3.035
59X
27.391
6,316
21,075
77X
1.106
226
880
SOX
1,816
1,739
77
4X
753
509
244
32*
5,560
644
4,916
88X
70.885
21,172
49,713
70X
Emissions
for Other
PSD Sources
1,407
666
741
53X
241
83
158
66X
220
220
0
m
5,159
3,625
1,534
30X
1,106
1,106
0
OX
1,057
813
244
23X
74
74
0
OX
0.2
0.2
0
OX
12,813
12,813
0
_OX
1,132
1,079
53
5X
23,209
20,479
2,730
12X
Total
Emissions
2,217
832
1,385
62X
8,243
1,131
7,112
86X
1.425
433
992
70X
24,284
11.854
12.430
SIX
6.223
3.188
3.035
49X
28,448
7,129
21,319
75X
1,180
300
880
75X
1,616
1.739
77
4X
13,566
13.322
244
a
6,692
1,723
4.969
74X
94,094
41,651
52.443
56X
DB 81-84
C-l
-------
TABLE C-2. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS PARTICIPATE MATTER EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH NAMED PSD SOURCES
o
1
ro
REGION I HUSSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to HSPS
KGION 11 EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to HSP5
REGION IFI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
REGION 1 EMISSIONS
Not Subject to- NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to KSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to HSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
TOT*. EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
f Svbject to NSPS
Electric Planti Coil
(UtltttlBtl Cleaning
>7SO MM Btu/hr Plants
4?
42
0
Of
953
81
87?
921
874 56
49 0
82$ 56
941 , l(Wt
3,536
19
3.517
991
2.702
99S
1.707
631
IT. 174 3.745
4,071 0
13. OH 3. MS
761 1001
99fl
118
HO
BM
166
166
0
Of
270
146
80
351
26,621 3,801
5.687 0
20,934 ].M1
79* lOOt
Kraft
Pulp
Hill
740
96
644
671
8. 379
2.940
5.439
6SI
1,371
108
1.263
921
3.105
578
7.577
811
37
37
0
Of
798
0
798
loos
14,475
3.754
10.671
741
Portland
Ceeonl
Plants
578
145
383
73*
599
304
28*
49*
362
110
244
671
279
0
779
1001
1.762
567
1,195
681
Iron and
Steel Hills
4
4
0
n
57
0
57
1001
108
56
5?
481
121
56
65
541
790
116
174
601
PrtMry Prleary
Aluclnue Copper
Ore Flints Shelters
1.079
175
854
83*
S5«
90
464
841
13
13
0
01
491
121
370
751
?,074 13
386 13
1,688 0
flll Of
Municipal
Incinerators Su If uric Acid
206
0
206
104B
95
0
95
ton
186
0
186
1001
932
36
096
961
252
0
252
ion
739 932
0 36
739 896
1001 961
Phosphate Rock
Petrele-ua lle» Processing Code Owen
4,897
332
4,565
931
16 160
0 160
16 0
1001 01
355 1,023
35S 866
0 157
at i«
105
305
0
01
761 470 193
S17 149 193
744 321 0
371 691 01
1,21? 112
1,212 35
0 77
01 691
193
193
0
01
7.723 598 1,023 353
2-914 184 866 3*3
4rB09 414 157 0
671 691 151 01
Secondary
Fuel Metal Chemical
Convartlofi Production' Process
24
24
0
Of
860
460
400
471
4
4
0
01
2,973 176 1.407
7.618 176 1.014
305 0 393
101 01 781
55 31]
55 313
0 0
01 01
179 209
179 789
0 0
OS 01
108
108
0
Of
492
492
0
01
3.470 305 3-005
3.165 305 2,212
3D5 0 793
91 OS 261
Total
Fossil Emissions
Fuel Boilers for Ha*e4
>2SO W ntu/hr PSD Sources
810
166
644
801
8,002
1.048
6.954
871
1.705
213
W2
83
19.125
8,729
10.896
571
237 5.117
237 2.062
0 3,035
Of 591
27,391
6,316
21,075
771
1,106
276
880
801
1.816
1,739
77
41
753
509
244
321
3.SU 5.560
377 644
3,137 4.916
891 881
3.751 70,895
614 21,172
3.137 49.713
841 701 ,
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE C-3. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH OTHER PSD SOURCES
Mining
(Other than
Coal. Iron)
WG10N 1 FMIJSIONS
Not Subject to NWS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject lo HSTS
REGION II FM15SIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject (o NSPS
REGION Ml EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
REGION IV (MISSIONS 311
Not Subject to NSPS 223
Subject to NSPS BB
Subject to NSPS 781
RfGIOH * EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to HSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION VIM EMISSIONS
Not Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
REGION 1* EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
J
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS 911
Mot Subject to NSPS 773
Subject to HSPS H
I Subject to HSPS 781
Natural
Gas and
Crude Oil
Pupping
Stations
.1
,1
0
01
75
75
0
01
46
40
0
01
17.606
17.686
0
549
549
0
01
13,358
I1.1SB
0
01
Rubber and
Fossil Electric Asphalt Plasttc
Fuel Boilers Plants Production Production
<250 MM fltu/nr <75p MM Btu/hr Plants Plants
706 IS
706 0
0 15
01 1001
71
0
01
15B 144 100
15B 144 100
0 00
01 01 OX
173 1)
173 13
0 0
01 01
79 ' 4B
79 4B
0 0
01 01
17
17
0
54
54
0
01
670 732 115 61
670 737 100 61
0 0 15 0
01 01 131 01
lui*«r Agrlcul-
Tflxtlle and Hood tural
Manufacturing Products Chemical
Plants Plants Production
365
365
0
OX
260 953 61
143 435 61
117 SIB 0
451 541 OX
70
70
0
01
500
336
2*4
421
?S
25
0
01
260 1.983 61
143 1.231 61
117 762 0
451 381 01
Natural Gas
Pro«»1ng
Plants
51
51
0
01
.5
.5
0
01
77
27
0
01
0,7
0.7
0
01
413
413
0
OX
492
492
0
01
Automtlve
Solid last- Graphite Part Manu- Kaolin Food
Redaction Electrode facturlng Processing Processing Printing
Plants Plants PUnl* Plants Plants PUnts Drewt««
776 *
0 »
726 0
1001 «
12 ISO
12 0
0 158
01 100X
770
270
0
OX
202 175 533 1,443 556
782 175 533 1.137 56
0 0 0 311 500
01 01 01 721 901
164 356
164 356
0 0
01 OX
21 1?5 179
71 175 179
00 0
01 OX 01
74
74
0
OX
110 0.4
HO 0.4
0 0
OX
' 91
3B
S3
SOX
036 315 339 650 7,437 556 179
110 315 339 650 1,915 56 179
776 0 00 577 500 0
W OX OX OX 2 IX 901 01
Total
Co>f>utrr G1*is Emission*
Manu- Nanu- *pp) lane* for
fairtuflnc. factoring Co* tins Other PSD
Plants Plants PUnts Sources
1.407
666
741
53X
741
83
ISO
720
220
0
OX
56 1 5,159
56 1 3,625
0 0 1.534
01 01 30X
770 109 1,106
770 109 1,106
000
01 OK OX
1,057
013
744
23X
74
74
0
OX
0.2
0.2
0
01
17.B13
17.B13
0
OX
1,132
1.079
S3
51
56 770 110 23.209
56 270 110 70.479
000 2.730
OX 01 OX 1 7%
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE C-4. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SOURCE
TYPES IN DATA BASE
REGION I EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
» Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
Emissions
for Nued
PSO Sources
9.220
1.725
7.495
81X
51,896
20,592
31,304
60X
19,190
2.690
16,500
86X
198,764
44,878
153,886
77X
72,533
31,601
40,932
56X
370,155
48,736
321,419
87X
11,946
3,280
8,666
73X
1,564
1,394
170
11X
4,798
4,529
269
6X
32,722
8,427
24,295
74X
772,788
167,852
604,936
78X
Emissions
for Other
PSD Sources
8.404
8.404
0
OX
670
548
122
18X
3.697
3,697
0
OX
104,637
85.798
18,839
18X
19.598
19.597
1
OX
19.782
16.767
3,015
15X
6,397
6,397
0
OX
966
966
0
OX
11.603
10.670
933
8X
1,205
348
857
71X
176,959
153,192
23,767
13X
Total
Emissions
17,624
10,129
7,495
43X
52.566
21.140
31,426
60X
22,887
6,387
16,500
72X
303,401
130,676
172,725
57X
'92,131
51.198
40,933
44X
389,937
65,503
324,434
83X
18,343
9,677
8,666
47X
2,530
2,360
170
7X
16,401
15,199
1,202
7X
33.927
8.775
25,152
74X
949.747
321,044
628.703
66X
DB 81-84
C-4
-------
TABLE C-5. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND MON-NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH NAMED PSD SOURCES
REGION I EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Not Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 Subject to HSPS
REGION MI EMISSIONS
Mot Subject to NSTS
Subject to NSPS
B Subject u> NSPS
REGION If EMISSIONS
Not Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 Subject to MSPS
WQ10M V EMISSIONS
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
B Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Setject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
| REGION VII EMISSIONS
( n Not S«t>Jajct to NSPS
w Subject to MSPS
Subject to MSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
' REGION IX EMISSIONS
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to HSPS
REGION 11 EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
f Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Not Subject to HSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
Electric Plintt
(UttMttetl
>2SO MN Btit/hr
96
0
01
11.975
374
11.651
971
Ib.Soo
0
I6.SOO
tool
63.874
1
63.673
1001
41.474
5.774
36,750
871
278.666
12.795
266,091
951
6,664
0
6,664
100S
1,094
1.060
14
11
1.995
0
1.995
loos
444,560
19,572
475,016
961
Coal Kraft
Cleaning Pule
Plintt M|1U
9.013
i.sie
7,495
57*
S7«
0
OS
56.771
18.777
37,994
671
11.817
8. 155
3.662
311
5.234 23.010
0 3.739
5.734 19,271
1001 641
160
160
0
01
2,664
1,064
1,600
601
5.762 103,435
520 13,413
5,234 70.022
911 661
Ceeant Iron and Alwlnun Copper
Plants Steel Mill* Ore Plants S«eUer*
10,246
10.246
1 1001
31 404 4,536
000
OS OS OS
6 40
e 40
0 0
OS 01
s. no
5.230
0
OS
1.097
1,097
0
OS
1,205 5,166
1,205 5.166
0 0
01 01
7.563 412 19,950 40
7.56) 412 9,702 40
0 0 10,246 0
01 OS SIS 01
Municipal Sulfurlc
Inclnaratora Actd
>250 tons/day Plants
657
657
0
OS
1,759
01
955 0
0 5,310
01 1 (KB
26.88*
0
26,669
1001
630
630
0
OS
3.501 32.199
3,501 0
0 32,199
01 1001
Pat rot (» Me*
Rartn«rt«9 Plants
21,706
13.740
7.966
371
101
101
0
Ot
3.949
3.949,
0
OB
9.769
3.779
10
0.31
6,564 330
3.078 330
3.466 0
531 01
906 67
170 0
2.447
2.192
255
IDS
39.361 498
27,474 496
11.887 0
301 01
Secondary
Phosphate finch Sulfur Carbon Fu*I Kwtel Chwfcal
Processing Cofct 0»a« Recovery Black Conversion Production Process
Planti Batter 1«i ^Plants Plants Plants Plants Plants
109
109
0
7.310
1.419
706 96
706 96
0 0
01 01
6,642 20.917 1 15.174
6,642 3.650 1 5.132
0 17.267 0 9,«47
OS 8)1 OS 62S
1.105 10.292
95 10,792
1.010 0
911 OS
9.707 1.016 9.154 1 4.1)4
9.707 1.016 9.154 1 3.666
000 0 446
OS OS OS OS 111
3,782
3,760
2
OS
591
591
0
01
6.642 10,413 1,016 9.154 23.613 2 40.397
6.642 10,413 1,016 9.1S4 4.336 2 79.066
0 000 16.777 0 11.331
OS 01 OS OS BIS OS 781
Fossil
>250 W Otu/hr
4,008
4,006
21.062
362
70.700
90S
75.070
4.J70
70. 7M
821
Total.
E»1ia1ona
(or HaMd
PSD Sources
9.J70
1,775
7,495
811
51.696
31.J04
19. 190
16,500
198,764
72.533
370,155
11.946
1.564
no
4,798
4,579
32.722
8.477
24,795
74S
772.766
167.652
604.936
78S
DB 81-84
-------
o
i
TABLE C-6. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH OTHER PSD SOURCES
RFGIOH I
Not SubJ
Subject
1 Subjec
EMISSIONS
to *SPS
1 to NSPS
Gat and
Mlalng Crude Oil
(Other than Pimping
Coal, Iron) Stations
_ .._ _.
Fats 11 Electric Asphalt
Fuel Bollart Plants Production
-------
TABLE C-7. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SOURCE
TYPES IN DATA BASE
REGION I EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* _SubJect to NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
Emissions
for Namd
PSD Sources
4,571
356
4,215
92*
40,992
12,076
28,916
71*
17,871
1,371
16,500
92*
127,871
32,560
95,311
75*
51,122
16.869
34,253
67*
313,116
48,418
264,698
85%
16,601
1,116
15.485
93*
9,371
9,371
0
0*
5.893
4.911
982
17*
78,766
60.814
17,952
23*
666,174
187,862
478,312
72*
Emissions
for Other
PSD Sources
5,141
5,062
79
2*
2,877
2.143
734
26*
2,440
2.440
0
0*
29,030
15,795
13.235
46*
11,796
10,965
831
70*
15,459
13,599
1,860
12*
5,758
5,758
0
0*
872
442
430
49*
5.280
4,998
282
5*
41,891
2,097
39,794
95*
120,544
63,299
57,245
47*
Total
Emissions
9,712
5,418
4,294
44*
43,869
14,219
29,650
68*
20,311
3,811
16,500
81*
156,901
48,355
108,546
69*
62,918
27,834
35,084
56*
328,575
62,017
266,558
81*
22,359
6,874
15,485
69*
10,243
9,813
430
4*
11,173
9,909
1.264
11*
120,657
62,911
57,746
48*
786,718
251,161
535,557
68*
DB 81-84
C-7
-------
TAE3LE C-8. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH NAMED PSD SOURCES
REGION 1 EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
S J to SPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSTS
1 Subject to HSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to MSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
REGION IT (MISSIONS
Mot Svfcjeet to T5PS
Subject to WSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
ICGION T EMISSION!
Hot Subject to HSPS
> Svbject to NSPS
flEGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to HSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
(SCION VII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
S Subject to NSPS
REGION 1MI EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to HSPS
Subject to KSPS
S*tJ«ct to HSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
I Subject tO NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
*hrt Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 Sibjeet to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Mot iubject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
Flectrlc Plantl Co*!
>750 NH Btu/hr Plants
739
719
0
17,765
789
17,476
1ft. SOO I5S
o us
[MB OS
7) ,«^l.
1001
34,788
3,538
901
763.776 2,980
10,096 7,980
733.680 0
14.760
0
14,760
1001
7,459
J.177
337
141
12.308
0
17.300
LOOS
433,551 3.135
36,790 3,135
397,7«| 0
Krift
NI1U
4,788
73
4.215
17.168
14,038
S31
7,430
4.217
431
11.811
3. MO
6,131
691
714
387
357
481
2,854
260
7.594
911
53.533
20,980
37,553
Portland PrlMry Prlmry
Ceeent Iron end Aluvlnux Copper
Plants Ste*l MMIi Ore Plants Snolters
4
0
5.976
0
1001
000
01 Of 01
572 40
01 01
874
S74
Of
1.569
1.569
0
OS
1,314 14
1.314 14
0 0
01 01
S.094 675 6,036 40
5.094 67J 58 40
0 0 5.978 0
Municipal Sulfurlc
[nclnerttori Acid Hltrlc Acid
>250 toni/dty Flint* PJtnts
985
9BS
OS
999
01
0 0 197
01 01 10CH
17,920
17,974
1001
3.150
3.150
0
Of
0.588 18.288 197
6.586 36? 0
0 17,9% 192
Phctphite floch Carbon f*u«1
P«trol«u> Ue» Proc»*«1r>g Cokn Oven flitch Companion
fieflnerUt P1«ntt Plant* Batter te. Pilot* Flint!
9,819
9,819
01
135 34
135 34
0 0
01 01
3.576 11.992
3,576 7.874
0 4.118
2,178 788
2,176 3
0 285
01 991
7.235 956 473 99
7,735 958 423 99
00 00
01 01 01 01
114
114
0
01
7,585 275 1.561
7.585 775 1.561
00 0
01 01 01
1.171
878
793
761
28,00} 1.318 3,576 457 99 13.841
77.709 1.316 3,S» 457 99 9.438
793 0 0 00 4,403
Production Trocesi
Plant* Flints
40
6.445
991
5.467
48
48
OS
726 10,777
276 5 , 769
0 5.508
5.034
5,034
0
01
199 6,835
199 1.874
0 4-961
01 731
1.777
1.002
775
421
47S 30.906
475 14,750
0 16.656
Foiill
Fuel Boll.rt
>750 MM Btu/hr
1.347
1.347
01
59. 1»
56,076
1.050
51
60.468
57,416
1.050
E.lsilont
for Htm*}
PSD SexjrCBl
4,571
971
40.997
12,076
78.916
17.871
127.871
51.122
16.869
671
313,116
764,698
16,601
1,116
15.485
931
9,171
9.371
0
01
5.891
4.911
987
in
78.766
60.614
17.957
73«
666.174
187,867
478,317
o
i
oo
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE C-9. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH OTHER PSD SOURCES
REGION i mission
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
HTC10H It (MISSIONS
Mot Sub J act to NVS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
KG10N 111 fNISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NS-5
I Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
t Subject to NSPS
' REGION vi EMISSIONS:
UD Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
Hot Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
» J
REGION *lll EMISSIONS
Not Sebject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
REGION II [MISSIONS
Hot Subject to HSPS
Subject to NSPS
t Subject to HSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
TOT Hi. EMISSIONS
Subject to NSPS
Nitur»l
G». end
Mining Crude Oil
(Other thin Fusing
Coil, Iron) Stilton*
T9
0
79
loot
we
0
AOfl
1001
950
950
0
Of
HI 2.273
UI 933
0 1.790
Of 581
I.M7
0
n
8,003
7,900
103
IX
1.150
1.150
0
0*
O9
439
0
Of
4,077
4,077
0
01
27.587
602
21. 905
971
14? 41,703
,0 14,065
FoMll
Fuel Bolter*
<7SO MM Btu/hr
659
659
0
n
471
0
OK
SSI
552
0
M
462
40?
0
01
2.170
0
Rubber md
Electrfc Aiphitt Pl»{lc
PUntt Production Production
-------
TABLE C-10. DISTRIBUTION OF MSPS AND MON-NSPS CAREON MONOXIDE
EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SOURCE
TYPES IN DATA BASE
REGION I EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
Emissions
for Named
PSD Sources
3,523
3,523
0
OX
6,133
3,148
2,985
49X
1,617
1,617
0
OX
105,342
105,342
0
OX
18,722
18,722
0
OX
56,026
53,519
2,507
4X
2,017
2,017
0
OX
491
491
0
OX
4,244
4,244
0
OX
27,180
27,180
0
OX
225,295
219,803
5,492
2X
Emissions
for Other
PSO Sources
13,006
13.006
0
OX
1.057
710
347
33X
1,222
1,222
0
OX
30,957
30.957
0
OX
1,446
1.446
0
OX
6,100
6,100
0
OX
1.111
1.111
0
OX
315
315
0
OX
2.392
2,392
0
OX
8,403
8,403
0
OX
66,009
65,662
347
0.5X
Total
Emissions
16,529
16,529
0
OX
7,190
3,858
3,332
46X
2,839
2,839
0
OX
136.299
136,299
0
OX
20,168
20,168
0
OX
62,126
59,619
2,507
41
3,128
3,128
0
Of
806
806
0
OX
6,636
6,636
0
OX
35,583
35,583
0
OX
291,304
285,465
5,839
2X
DB 81-84
C-10
-------
TABLE Oil. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NOM-NSPS CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH NAMED PSD SOURCES
o
REGION T EMISSIONS
Hot subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION 11 EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to HSPS
REGION MI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 Subject to HSPS
REGION IV tNISSlWS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION * EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to HSPS
Subject to HSPS
X Subject to NSPS
Hot Subject to HSPS
SubjKl to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
1 'Subject to NSPS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
Fleet He Plants Coal
>750 MM 8tu/hr Plants
841
f>43
0
01
1 247
1,747
0
OS
1,100 21
1,100 21
0 0
OS OX
5,669
5,669
0
01
3.306
3,306
0
OS
34,855 776
34,055 7T6
0 0
Of 0*
1,750
1,750
0
OS
362
0
OX
7,976
0
01
57.058 797
5?, 058 797
0 0
01 OX
Pulp Hills
7,317
7,317
0
01
20,983
20,983
0
01
10,283
10.783
0
OX
6,047
6.047
0
635
635
0
1.424
1,474
41.684
41.684
0
OS
Portland
Plants
92
92
0
OX
7,960
2.960
0
3.052
3,052
OX
PrlMry
Steol Hills Ore PUnts
706
706
0
OX
01 336
01 336
0 0
01 01
7)3 19,717
213 19,717
01 OS
536
536
14.192
14,192
1.036 34.245
1,036 34,24!
01 OS
Prfeary Municipal Sulfurlc
Shelters >no ton»/diy Plants
703
703
0
OS
406
406
0
OX
241 9
241 9
1,695
1. 695
OX
7,047
2.847
0
1,260
1,760
1,695 2,110 jZ,856
1,695 2.110 2,056
OS OX OS
Refineries
3,770
705
7,905
791
840
840
0
OX
3,194
607
83
83
01
707
267
8,174
2,682
67S
Secondary
Phosphate Rock Fuel M«tal Chmlcjl
Plants Plants Plant-. Plants Plants
162
162
0
01
496
4%
0
OX
90
90
0
OX
75,594 30,456 17 2,351
25,594 30.456 17 2,3SI
01 01 01 01
730 1,078
730 1,078
0 0
W 01
630 657 7,512
638 657 7,512
0 00
01 [B 01
767
767
150 250
ISO 75B
878 2S.594 31.444 674 11,016
078 75.594 31,444 674 11.016
OS OX Dt OS 01
fossil
>?<>D MM Rtu/hr
304
304
0
01
7.370
7.170
0
OK
7,687
7,687
0
01
ToUl
Emissions
P5P Source*
OX
3,148
7.985
491
1.617
OS
105,342
01
18,727
01
56,076
53.519
2,507
41
2,017
?,ni?
0
01
491
0
01
0
01
77,180
0
OS
275,295
219.003
5.492
7S
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE C-12. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS
(IN TONS/YEAR) ASOCIATED WITH OTHER PSD SOURCES
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
« Subject to NSPS
N.turtl G»j
Mining (Other *nd Crude Oil
30
30
0
01
Fuel Boilers
(750 MM (Itu/hr
6
0
01
Electric Asphalt anr| Pl.nlc T««tll« and Hood
PUnti ProUij{ t Ion Production Henuf actur Ing Products
<2SO MM niu/hr PUnti Plaots Plantt Planti
0.5 73
0.5 23
0 0
01 01
Totil
Agricultural Natural GiS Solid Waste GraphUf ^tonolUe Part Kaolin Food *PPMancp Eni^loni
Che. lc. 1 Process Inr, R*cU»*tlon Mrctrode Haruf actur Ing P.oce-.slng ProC«S«ng Printing Co.! Ing lor Oth*r
Production Plants Plant, PUnt* Pl«"li P"nts PUnts Plants Pre.«rlei Plant. PSP Soufcos
12,946 13.006
o °
01 °*
WGIO* 111 EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
I Subject to NSPS
WGION |f EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
WHICH » rxissios
«ot Subject to NSTS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
WGIW VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
(-) Subject to NSPS
| 1 Subject to NSPS
|
--. FSG1O fit EMISSIONS
IX^ Not Subject to MSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject to NSTS
REGION VIII [M|SSI»S
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
RfGlOH IK (MISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to WSPS
I Subject lo HSPS
(5GIOH I EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
1 Subject lo NSPS
TOT At EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject lo NSPS
1 Subject to NSPS
156
156
0
01
19 330
19 330
0 0
01 01
308
308
0
01
2, 145
2.145
0
01
330
330
0
«
250
250
0
01
1,701
1,701
0
01
3,774
3,774
0
01
19 8,554
19 8.554
0 0
01 01
710 93 1 2
710 931 2
0 00
01 01 01
77 17t)
72 120
0 0
01 J 01
720
720
0
or.
144
144
C
m
194
194
0
01
907 I.P40 3 120
9B7 1,640 3 l?0
0 000
01 01 OS 01
1.066
1,066
0
01
93 941 2* 7,552 1B.031 69
93 941 24 7,52? !P,(n3 ft9
0000 00
01 0* W 01 01 01
32 107 43 739
37 187 <3 739
000 0
01 01 01 01
1. 901 1.803 14
1.901 1.603 1*
000
01 fl 01
65
65
0
n
53?
537
0
01
470 4,355
470 4.35S
0 0
0* 01
12S ),572 J* 13.818 13,478 20,6*8 300
125 3,52? 74 13,816 13.478 20, MB 300
0 0 0 0 00 0
01 01 01 01 01 01 01
77 1,080 2*0
22 l.OflS 740
0 00
01 01 01
46?
*67
0
01
45
45
0
01
6]
61
0
01
15
15
0
01
110
110
0
OS
37 7.066 740 45
37 1,721 740 4S
0 347 0 0
01 171 01 (71
1.27?
1 .77?
0
01
3 30.957
3 30.957
0 0
01 01
175 1,**6
175 1.4*6
0 0
01 01
6, 100
6. 100
0
01
t.lll
1,111
0
m
)15
0
01
7. '97
7,11?
0
01
8,40)
8,103
0
01
PB 66,009
US 6S.662
0 347
01 0.51
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE C-13. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND
EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SOURCE TYPES
IN DATA BASE
REGION I EMISSIONS
-Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION III EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
* Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VI EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
% Subject to NSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION IX EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
Emissions
for Naaed
PSD Sources
171
171
0
OX
7,742
6,805
937
12X
323
323
0
OX
18,350
18,097
253
IX
818
394
424
52X
3,628
3.548
80
2)5
263
262
1
0.4X
1,536
1,394
142
9X
4,731
4,731
0
OX
1,191
1.191
0
OX
38,752
36,915
1.837
5X
Emissions
for Other
PSD Sources
562
562
0
OX
128
128
0
OX
50
50
0
OX
7,918
5,871
2,047
26X
3,724
2,553
1,171
3 IX
1.165
1.165
0
o*
1.154
1,154
0
OX
200
200
0
OX
1.046
1.046
0
OX
1.552
1.552
0
OX
17,499
14,281
3.218
18X
Total
Emissions
733
733
0
OX
7,870
6,933
937
12X
373
373
0
OX
26,268
23,968
2,300
9X
4,542
2,947
1,595
35X
4,793
4,713
80
2X
1,417
1.416
1
0.1X
1,736
1,594
142
8X
5,777
5.777
0
OX
2,743
2.743
0
OX
56,251
51.196
5.055
9X
DB 81-84
C-13
-------
TABLE C-14.
DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND
EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH NAMED PSD SOURCES
KGIOM t tNlSSIWS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
« Subject to NSPS
(SGltH 11 FMISSTCWS
Not Subject to HSTS
SuhJ*cl to KSPS
Subject to NSPS
RCGtOM II | FMISSIOTS
l*ot SubjMt lo NSPS
>250 lon*/d»y Pl»nti
Phosphate Rock
Processing
RFGIOH If (HISSlnNS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject lo MSP;
t Subject to NSPS
REGIW T EW1SSIOMS
ttot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to KSPS
O
I
1* WCION fl EMISSIONS
-P» Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
RIGIW vii ENISSIOM;
Net Subject to NSPS
Subject to KSPS
Subject to NSPS
KGIW Nil EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
REGION II EMISSIONS
Net Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
REGION I CNISSIWS
Hot Sufeject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
T0TN. CHI SSI CMS
Hot Subject to NS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
14.071
17,097
1,119
W.7S2
36,915
1,837
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE C-15. DISTRIBUTION OF NSPS AND NON-NSPS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND
EMISSIONS (IN TONS/YEAR) ASSOCIATED WITH OTHER PSD SOURCES
REGION I EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION 11 EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
S Subject to HSPS
REGION II) EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
S Subject to NSPS
REGION IV EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
B Subject to HSPS
REGION V EMISSIONS
Not Subject to HSPS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION VI [MISSIONS
Subject to NSPS
X Subject to HSPS
REGION VII EMISSIONS
Hot Subject to HSPS
Subject to NSPS
S Subject to NSPS
REGION VIII EMISSIONS
Mot Subject to NSPS
Subject to MSPS
X Subject to NSPS
REGION 11 EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to HSPS
S Subject to NSPS
REGION X EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to MSPS
X Subject to NSPS
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Not Subject to NSPS
Subject to NSPS
I Subject to NSPS
Natural Gas
Mining (Other and Crude Oil
than Coal, Iron) Puaplng Stations
2
2
OX
01
OS
ID 32
10 32
0 0
OS OS
179
179
0
OB
619
619
0
OS
73
73
0
OS
700
700
0
n
961
961
0
01
70
70
0
OS
10 7.20?
10 2.202
0 0
OS OS
Fossil Electric Asphalt and Plastic Textile and Hood Agricultural
<250 MM Blu/hr
-------
APPENDIX D
COMPARISONS OF BACT EMISSION RATES
-------
I
TABLE D-l. MEftN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR FLARES/INCINERATORS AT CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANTS
Region3
REGION IV
REGION VI
NATIONWIDE
Partlculate Matter
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
6 .112 ± .071
1 .005 ± .000
7 ,096 + .076
Sulfur Dioxide
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
3 .213 ± .029
1 .017 ± .000
4 .164 ± .101
Nltroaen Oxides
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
6 .858 ± .745
1 .120 ± .000
7 .753 ± .735
Carbon Monoxide
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
6 .783 ± .251
1 .0005 ± .000
7 .672 ± .374
aReg1ons omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for flares/Incinerators between 1981 and mid-1984.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-2. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR THERMAL DRYERS
AT COAL PREPARATION PLANTS
Partlculate Matter
Region
REGION III
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
o Total
IV) . . .
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
1
0
1
1
0
1
18
0
18
20
0
20
Mean BACT
Rate (gr/dscf)
.030 +
0
.030 ±
.010 ±
0
.010 ±
.010 +
0
.010 ±
.011 ±
0
.011 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.004
.004
Sulfur Dioxide
Number
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0
1.90 ± 0.0
1.90 + 0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.90 + 0.0
1.90 ± 0.0
Nltroaen Oxide
Number
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0
.600 +
.600 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.600 +
.600 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any thermal dryer between 1981 and mid-1984.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-3. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK COATING OPERATIONS
Volatile Oraanlc Comoounds
Region
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION V
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Prime
Number
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
Coat Operation
Mean BACT.
Rate (Kg/lD)
.159 ±
0
.159 ±
0
.159 +
.159 ±
.159 +
.159 +
.159 ±
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
Guide
Number
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
2
Coat Operation
Mean BACT
Rate (Kg/l°)
2.94 + 0.0
0
2.94 ± 0.0
1.40 + 0.0
0
1.40 ± 0.0
2.17 + 0.0
0
2.17 ± 0.0
Tog Coat Ooeratlon
Number
1
0
1
2
0
2
3
0
3
Mean BACT.
Rate (Kg/1 )
4.58
4.58
1.47
1.47
2.51
2.51
+ 0.00
0
± 0.00
+ 0.00
0
± 0.00
+ 1.80
0
± 1.80
General Coatlna
Number
0
0
0
1
6
7
1
6
7
Mean BACT.
Rate (Kg/lD)
0
0
0
.340 ±
.477 +
.457 ±
.340 +
.477 ±
.457 ±
.000
.226
.213
.000
.226
.213
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for these surface coating operations between 1981 and mid-1984.
bKg of VOC per liter of applied solids.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-4. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR FUEL CONVERSION PLANTS
Part 1cul ate Matter
Source/Emission Unit
Shale 01lb
Retort
Boiler/Heater
Coal Liquefaction0
O Flare/Incinerator
^ Boiler/Heater
Geothermal Energy
Boiler/Heater
Mean BACT
Number Rate
1 .040 ± .000
9 .012 ± .004
0 0
30 .228 ± .754
1 .014 ± .000
Unit
of
Emissions
gr/dscf
Ib/MM
Ib/MM
Ib/MM
'
Btu
Btu
Btu
Number
1
10
1
30
1
Sulfur
Mean
Dioxide
BACT
Rate
300 ±
.098 ±
1000 ±
.003 ±
.600 ±
.000
.025
0.0
0.0
.000
Unit of
Emissions
ppm
Ib/MM Btu
ppm
gr/dscf
Ib/MM Btu
Nitrogen Oxides
Mean BACT Unit of
Number Rate Emissions
00
10 .182 ± .038 Ib/MM Btu
00--
30 .190 ± .000 Ib/MM Btu
1 .250 ± .000 Ib/MM Btu
Carbon Monoxide
Number
0
8
0
0
0
Mean BACT
Rate
0
.019 ± .000
0
0
0
Unit of
Emissions
Ib/MM Btu
--
These plants are not subject to NSPS.
Shale oil emission units are 1n Region VIII.
CCoal liquefaction emission units are 1n Region IV.
Geothermal energy emission units are 1n Region V.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-5. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR INCINERATORS BURNING SOLID WASTE WHICH IS AT LEAST 50 PERCENT MUNICIPAL
I
in
Participate Matter
Region3
REGION I
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION II
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION III
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION X
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
9
0
9
3
0
3
3
0
3
4
0
4
3
0
3
22
0
22
Mean BACT
Rate (gr/dscf)
.043 ±
0
,043 ±
.030 ±
0
.030 ±
.015 +
0
.015 ±
.038 ±
0
.038 ±
.015 ±
0
.015 ±
.033 ±
0
.033 +
.013
.013
.000
.000
.000
.000
.014
.014
.000
.000
.015
.015
Sulfur Dioxide
Number
0
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton)
0
2.63 ± 1.14
2.63 ± 1.14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.63 + 1.14
2.63 + 1.14
Nltroaen Oxides
Number
0
9
9
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
12
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton)
0
3.28 + 1.73
3.28 ± 1.73
0
3.00 + 0.00
3.00 ± 0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
< 0
3.21 ± 1.48
3.21 ± 1.48
Carbon Monoxide
Number
0
9
9
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
12
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton)
0
18,5 + 14.2
18,5 ± 14.2
0
.620 + .000
.620 ± .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14.0 + 14.5
14.0 + 14.5
Volatile
Organic Compounds
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/ton)
0
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
.934 ±
.934 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.964 +
.964 +
.894
.894
.894
.894
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any Incinerators between 1981 and mid-1984.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-6. MEAN DACT EMISSION RATES FOR LIME KILNS AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
Partlculate Matter
Region3
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION V
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
*p Not Subject to NSPS
CD Total
REGION X
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
6
0
6
1
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
10
0
10
Mean BACT
Rate (gr/dscf)
.130 +
0
.130 ±
.067 +
0
.067 ±
.130 +
0
.130 ±
.067 H-
0
.067 ±
.117 ±
0
.117 ±
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
i
.000
.027
.027
Sulfur Dioxide
Number
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/toh )
0
.316 + .259
.316 ± .259
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.316 ± .259
.316 ± .259
Nltroaen Oxides
Number
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
Mean BACT
Rate < Ib/ton )
0
2.07 + .608
2.07 ± .608
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.07 ± .608
2.07 + .608
Carbon Monoxide
Number
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton3)
0
10.0 ± 0.0
10.0 ± 0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10.0 + 0.0
10.0 ± 0.0
Total Reduced Sulfur
Mean BACT
Number Rate (ppm)
6
0
6
1
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
10
0
10
8.0 ± 0.0
0
8.0 ± 0.0
8.0 ± 0.0
0
8.0 ± 0.0
8.0 ± 0.0
0
8.0 ± 0.0
8.0 ± 0.0
0
8.0 ± 0.0
8.0 + 0.0
0
8.0 ± 0.0
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any Hme kiln between 1981 and mid-1984.
Ib/ton of black liquor solids.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 0-7. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR RECOVERY FURNACES AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
Partlculate Matter
Region3
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION V
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION X
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
8
0
8
2
0
2
2
0
2
1
0
1
13
0
13
Mean BACT
Rate (gr/dscf)
.044 +
0
.044 ±
.039 +
0
.039 ±
.044 +
0
.044 ±
.044 t
0
.044 ±
.043 +
0
.043 +
.000
.000
.008
.008
.000
.000
.000
.000
.003
.003
Sulfur Dioxide
Number
0
7
7
0
1
1
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
8
8
Mean BACT
Rate (ppm)
0
291 ± 11
291 ± 11
0
250 ± 0
250 ± 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
286 + 18
286 + 18
Nltroaen Oxides
Number
0
5
5
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
7
Mean BACT
Rate (ppm)
0
174 ±55
174 ± 55
0
400 ± 0
400 ± 0
0
77 ± 0
77 ± 0
0
0
0
0
193 + 108
193 + 108
Carbon Monoxide
Number
0
3
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
Mean BACT .
Rate (Ib/ton )
0
2.0 + 0.0
2.0 ± 0.0
0
8.0 ± 0.0
8.0 ± 0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5 + 3.0
3.5 + 3.0
Total Reduced Sulfur
Number
8
0
8
2
0
2
2
0
2
1
0
1
13
0
13
Mean BACT
Rate (ppm)
5.0 ± 0.0
0
5.0 ± 0.0
5.0 + 0.0
0
5.0 ± 0.0
5.0 + 0.0
0
5.0 ± 0.0
5.0 + 0.0
0
5.0 ± 0.0
5.0 + 0.0
0
5.0 + 0.0
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any recovery furnaces between 1981 and mid-1984.
Ib/ton of black liquor sol Ids.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-8. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR SMELT DISSOLVING TANKS AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
Participate Matter
Region
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION V
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
0 Subject to NSPS
^ Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION X
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
7
1
8
1
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
11
1
12
Mean BACT.
Rate (Ib/ton )
.200 +
.200 +
.200 ±
.200 ±
0
.200 ±
.200 +
0
.200 +
.200 +
0
.200 ±
.200 +
.200 +
.200 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
Sulfur Dioxide
Number
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
Mean BACT
Rate (lb/tonD)
0
.100 ± .000
.100 ± .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.100 + .000
.100 + .000
Tota] Reduced Sulfur
Number
7
1
S
1
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
11
1
12
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton")
.0168 +
.0168 +
.0168 +
.0168 ±
0
.0168 ±
.0168 +
0
.0168 ±
.0168 +
0
.0168 ±
.0168 +
.0168 +
.0168 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any smelt dissolving tank between 1981 and mid-1984.
Ib/ton of black liquor solids.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-9. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR KILNS AT LIME MANUFACTURING PLANTS
Partlculate Matter
Region3
REGION III
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VIII
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
I
1
0
1
0
2
2
1
0
1
2
2
4
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton )
.180 +
0
.180 ±
0
.313 +
.313 ±
.300 ±
0
.300 ±
.240 +
.313 ±
.276 4-
.000
.000
.407
.407
.000
.000
.085
.407
.243
Su.lfur Dioxide
Number
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
Mean BACT.
Rate (Ib/ton )
0
1.13 ± 0.0
1.13 ± 0.0
0
.044,+ .000
.044 + .000
0
0
0
0
.587 ± .768
.587 ± .768
Nltroaen Oxides
Number
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton)
0
1.50 ± 0.0
1.50 ± 0.0
0
.125 ± .000
.125 ± .000
0
0
0
0
.813 ± .972
.813 ± .972
Car'bon Monoxide
Number
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton )
0
0
0
0
.083 ±
.083 ±
0
0
0
0
.083 +
.083 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
Regions omitted did 'not Issue a PSD permit for any kiln between 1981 and mid-1984.
Ib/ton of limestone feed.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-10. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR SULFUR RECOVERY PLANTS AND HEATERS AT NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANTS
Sulfur Recovery Plants
Sulfur Dioxide
Mean BACT
Region Number Rate (ppm)
REGION IV 0 0
REGION V 0 0
REGION VI 1 400+0
0
0 REGION VIII 1 250 ± 0
REGION X 0 0
NATIONWIDE 2 325 ± 106
Participate Matter
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
5 .013 ± .000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 .013 ± .000
Heaters
Sulfur Dioxide
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
9 .040 ± .000
9 .040 ± .000
Nitrogen Oxides
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
5 .150 ± .000
1 .110 ± .000
12 .203 ± .066
0 0
10 .123 ± .009
28 .162 ± .057
Carbon Monoxide
Mean BACT
Number Rate < Ib/MM Btu)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
9 .020 ± .000
9 .020 ± .000
Natural gas processing plants are not subject to NSPS.
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any sulfur recovery plant or heater between 1981 and mid-1984.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE 0-11. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR CLAUS SULFUR RECOVERY PLANTS AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
O
I
Region
REGION II
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
I
Partlculate Matter
Mean BACT
Number Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
.352 ± .000
.352 ± .000
0
0
0
0
.352 + .000
.352 ± .000
Sulfur
Number
1
0
1
4
0
4
5
0
5
Dioxide
Mean BACT
Rate (ppm)
250 + .000
0
250 ± .000
249.8 + .500
0
249.8 ± .500
249.8 ± .447
0
249.8 + .447
Number
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
Nitrogen Oxides
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0
.300 + .000
.300 ± .000
0
0
0
0
.300 ± .000
.300 + .000
aReg1ons omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any Claus sulfur recovery plant between 1981 and mid-1984.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-12. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR FCCU CATALYST REGENERATORS AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
Partlculate Matter
Sulfur Dioxide
Mean BACT Rate (lb/1000
O
i
ro
Region3
REGION II
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
3
0
3
1
0
1
3
0
3
7
0
7
Ib of Coke Burn-off)
.867 ±
0
.867 ±
1.00 +
0
1.00 ±
i
.917 t
0
.917 ±
.907 +
0
.907 +
.115
.115
.000
.000
.076
.076
.093
.093
Number
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
2
Mean BACT
Rate (gr/dscf)
0
.10 ± .00
.10 ± .00
0
0
0
0
.10 + .00
.10 ± .00
0
.10 + .00
.10 + .00
Nltroaen Oxides
Number
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
Mean BACT
Rate (ppm)
0
175 + 0.0
175 ± 0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,
175 + 0.0
175 + 0.0
Carbon Monoxide
Mean BACT
Number
3
0
3
1
0
1
4
0
4
8
0
8
Rate (ppm)
500
500
500
500
480
480
490
490
+ 0
0
± 0
± 0
0
± 0
+ 34
0
± 34
+ 24
0
+ 24
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any FCCU catalyst regenerator between 1981 and mid-1984.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-13. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICES AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
O
I
Partlculate Matter
Region3
REGION II
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION V
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VII
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VIII
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION IX
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
12b
2
14
0
5
5
0
8
8
0
29
29
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
10
10
12b
63
75
Sulfur Dioxide
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MM Btu) Number
.080 +
.181 +
.095 ±
0
.016 ±
.016 ±
0
.014 +
.014 ±
0
.032 ±
.032 ±
0
0
0
0
.018 ±
.018 +
0
.100 +
.100 ±
.080 +
.042 +
.048 +
.036
.242
.083
.000
.000
.005
.005
.022
.022
.003
.003
.000
.000
.036
.051
.051
14
0
14
5
0
5
5
3
8
71
7
78
3
0
3
9
0
9
0
10
10
107
20
127
Mean BACT
Rate (gr/dscf)
.100 +
0
.100 ±
.100 ±
0
.100 ±
.100 ±
.030 +
.074 ±
.099 +
.119 ±
.101 ±
.100 ±
0
.100 ±
.100 ±
0
.100 ±
0
.160 +
.160 ±
.099 +
.126 ±
.104 +
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.036
.008
.049
.017
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.007
.053
.024
Nltroaen Oxides
Number
0
14
14
0
0
0
0
16
16
0
88
88
0
3
3
0
9
9
0
10
10
0
140
140
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MH Btu)
0
.302 ±
.302 ±
0
0
0
0
.137 ±
.137 ±
0
.177 ±
.177 ±
0
.150 +
.150 ±
0
.111, +
.111 ±
0
.400 +
.400 ±
0
.196 +
.196 +
.075
.075
.075
.075
.081
.081
.000
.000
.001
.001
.000
.000
.102
.102
parbon Monoxide
Number
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
10
0
26
26
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0
.025 +
.025 ±
0
0
0
0
.040 +
.040 ±
0
.014 +
.014 ±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.040 +
.040 ±
0
.030 +
.030 +
.009
.009
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.012
.012
Volatile
Orpanlc Comoounds
Number
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0
.004 ±
.004 +
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.004 +
.004 +
.002
.002
.002
.002
"Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for aqy fuel gas combustion device between 1981 and mid-1984.
bPre!1m1nary Determination Summaries from two applications Indicated that these units were subject to Subpart J for PM.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-14. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR KILNS AND CLINKER COOLERS AT PORTLAND CEMENT PLANTS
Partlculate Matter
l_i
t »
-F»
Region8
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION IX
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION X
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Number
2
0
2
1
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
6
0
6
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton )
.250 +
0
.250 +
.300 ±
0
.300 +
.225 +
0
.225 ±
.120 +
0
.120 ±
.228 ±
0
.228 ±
.071
.071
.000
.000
.106
.106
.000
.000
.083
.083
K1ln
Sulfur Dioxide
Number
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
1
0
4
4
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/MM Btu)
0
.830 + .000
.830 ± .000
0
0
0
0
1.04 + .933
1.04 ± .933
0
1.58 + 0.0
1.58 ± 0.0
0
1.12 ± .627
1.12 + .627
Cl inker Cooler
Nltrooen Oxides
Number
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
1
0
4
4
Mean BACT
Rate (Ib/ton )
0
1.80 ± .000
1.80 t .000
0
0
0
0
2.20 + .000
2.20 + .000
0
1.73 + .000
1.73 ± .000
0
1.98 + .413
1.98 ± .413
Partlculate Matter
Number
2
0
2
,
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
1
5
0
5
Mean BACT
Rate (lb/tonb)
.108 +
0
.108 ±
0
0
0
.100 ±
0
.100 ±
.094 +
0
,094 ±
.102 +
0
.102 ±
.059
.059
.000
.000
.000
.000
.030
.030
Regions omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any kiln or clinker cooler between 1981 and mid-1984.
blb/ton of feed.
08 81-84
-------
TABLE D-15. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR STATIONARY GAS TURBINES
o
Pftrtf £.!.*» fc«-
^tM
KCION I
it* J wet to OS^9
*rt MjKt to NTS
wen* n
J*»J«ct to *tn
W IwbjKt to NJP9
V610N HI
S**]«rt to «S^J
K>t jvfcjuet to KPS
MfllOH If
i«*j«ct to «r»
WOIW I
s**j«et to Msn
MM Mj*ri te nri
Tottl
M^/to «SW
PWGIW ni
Svfejvet to Wl
tat S«tJ«e1 te «
tol.l
S*J«ct to ion
Tout
item n
*rt »«*J«ct to HVS
Trt.l
Total
Hot Srtjiet to «n
Tot.l
_r
9
0
D
0
0
9
0
0
9
I
9
0
0
9
'
9
1
1
9
9
9
9
*
1
9
9
1
MM* MCT
«*to lift/Ml *>
9
9
9
9
0
0
f
9
0
I
0
9
9
9
9
.919 t *
.910 i .000
9
.0009 * .00
.ooos t .00
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
.099 1 .9*4
.009 t .004
9
9
9
9
'9
9
9
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
MB BUTT
tot* I IbvtM Mi
9
0
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0
0
9
0
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0
9
9
9
9
9
0
., ,
1
0
1
9
9
9
9
1
1
9
1
1
j
9
3
9
9
9
1
9
I
9
9
9
9
119
9
119
171
t
in
MM.
ISO
HO
ISO
ISO
12
17
ISO
190
190
190
190
ISO
190
190
n
79
91
S.1
« MCT
i 9
0
t o
0
9
9
9
t 9
i 9
9
t 0
t 0
i 9
9
i 0
i 9
9
i 9
i o
0
* 9
9
9
0
t 0
0
i 0
1 47
0
t 47
* 94
t *9
t 94
l*tJUml*L_
r~.r
9
9
9
17
9
32
9
9
0
1
9
9
0
B
10
9
10
9
9
0
9
0
0
9
70
7*
9
9
0
S7
79
99
-
MMH MCT
tat* lftp*>
9
9
0
e.f i n
e.t i n
0
9
0
190 t 0
0
190 1 0
0
190 1 9
ISO t 0
1399 1 77Wb
n«S * 77Wb
9
9
0
9
9
0
fS t '7
J5 ! 9
fll t «
9
9
0
799 1 10*1*
92 I «
2IS t M3
MM* BNCT
1
0
1
)
0
9
1
9
1
1
j
' 0
)
11
a
34
|
9
1
7
9
2
2
1
1
HI
9
111
IM
29
167
139 t
0
1)9 4
191 f
9
191 *
9
ISO i
190 *
9
ITS i
in ±
179 i
179 1
119 t
79 t
0
n t
130 t
0
130 t
m t
UT t
9
»' 1
140 i
1*1 i
140 f
9
0
0
9
9
0
9
0
43
13
4
37
37
0
0
9
9
4T
9
m
14
14
79
97
49
N.M MCT
0
0
0
37
0
"
9
9
0
1
0
1
0
9
0
9
9
9
9
0
9
9
9
S
70
15
9
9
9
49
29
14
9
9
0
ISO | 0
0
ISO * 0
0
9
9
17* t 0
9
m * o
0
n i 9
T5 1 0
T9 i 0
0
T9 * 9
0
0
0
9
0
119 t 41
4S 1 0
M i 35
0
0
0
1)3 t 11
9) t 14
193 * 47
0
0
D
0
9
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
9
9
9
0
1
1
9
9
0
0
9
9
Y9
TO
9
n
n
MMH MCT !
9
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
0
0
9
9
9
9
I.M t 1 "
9
.100 i .000
.100 1 .000
0
0
0
9
9
.10* 4 .000
.109 i .000
9
IK t .S29
,729 I .57*
Jteu-lfe
VBi.tn. orurir r-itnr-T
MM WCT »it« few MCT Kit* fen MCT Nito
fei**r fg/hp-hrl Nwtor (o/fcf-hr) Nw**r <»/h»-hrl
9
0
0
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
9
9
9
0
9
0
0
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
9
9
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
909
000
000
000
000
000
099
000
000
099
999
000
000
000
000
000
4 .700 * .000 0
4 .700 t .000 0
000
000
000
090
000
009
900
000
900
000
000
000
4 .TOO t .000 9
* .no * .000 o
9
9
0
9
0
0
9
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1]
0
0
0
0
0
0
HIM It 7000 w*.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-16. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR STATIONARY IHTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
Sal fur Qlnali
M*tn BACT Nit*
tib/Mt Btui
HMM BACT IMto
"ECU* U
svtjAct tm tan
lot.l
««t« til
MJact to HSn
fcrt MJoct to WS
Tot»l
KSIOi IT
MJ«rt to «m
ot MjKt to IBTS
KGICB *
MjKt to MPt
Mot fofcJKt to VSn
Kfiioi n
$**j«ci to mn
ttot MJ«c1 to Mn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
f
0
'
0
2
2
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.053 £ .000
.053 t .000
0
0
0
0
.100 i .000
.100 t .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
2 .015 t .000
2 .015 1 .000
t 0
0 0
0 , 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 .
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o e
0 0
000
003
003
000
003
003
0 0 14
2 2.67 i 0.0 1
2 2.67 t 0.0 17
003
0 0 15
0 0 It
001
0 0 «
0 0 81
0
15.5 i 4.7*
IS.S 1 4.7*
0
U.O t 4.33
14.0 * 4.33
*.M 1 0.32
10.3 i 4,04
9.90 t 1-47
12.0 J 0.00
1.*7 t 1-25
B.56 i 3.3S
6. SO t 0.00
*.*4 t ***
O.M t 6.03
1 *.00 i .000
9 t.W 1 .000
4 1,70 i .000
0 I
0 0
0 0
1* T.M i .333
3 O.S7 1 .551
21 7.11 i .474
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1 7.00 i 0.0
1 1.00 t 0.0
000
001
003
000
000
ooo
0*0
002
002
000
7 I.K2 t 0.0 0
7 l.*2 t 0.0 0
000
10 l.n i 4.*2 *
10 I.M t 4.*2
0000
.27* 1 .4» 0 0 3
.27* i .42* 001
ooo
t 0 0 0
oooo
1 000
.575 1 .000 0 0 2
.575 1 .000 0 0 2
000
o 7 .rra t .too
0 7 .710 t .000 0
I 000
10 2.34) 1 I.M I
10 2.3* i 1.7* 0
.154 1 .254
0
0
.2*0 1 .00*
0
0
0
10.) i i.oa
10.3 t )»
15.1 t .4*5
15.7 t -4*5
0
1.5* 1 0.0
1.5* t 0-0
.not .n
.110 i .w
flEGION Till
$BkJ*d to MVS
Mot MJact to *
HOI $«*>j«ct to tan
KGIM K
MJ«rt t* HSn
MTIOWIDE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4J
1
*
o o
0 0
0 0
e o
0 0
o o
4 .076 t .027
4 .016 t .027
0
*
0
2
2
0
a
t
0
0
.011 i .000
.015 1 .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10
1.7* i 1.03 W
I.TI 1 1.03 108
0 1
0 1
o e
0 0
0 »
t.M 1 1.24 H
*.n i «.io i*
*.3S i S.H IS
4.90 i 0.0
4.30 1 0.0
*.M i 0.0
0
*.M i 0.0
1.77 t 0.32
I.S1 t 3.57
0.27 i 2.02
*
0
0
«
0
0
IT
17
0 *
0 0
0 0
* *
0
0 0
4.10 t «.21 T
4.1* 1 4.21 7
0
0
;(
*
t
.7)0 t -*4*
.7W i .MS
0
0
0
0
0
0
IT
IT
0
0 0
0 0
*
0 0
0 0
LSI t I.T* *
LSI i i.ra
i
0
*
0
0
.117 1
.1*2 i
.in
.173
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-17. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR ELECTRIC ARC FURNACES AND REHEAT FURNACES AT STEEL PLANTS
0
Electric Arc
Partlculate Matter
Region4
REGION II
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION IV
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION V
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
REGION VI
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
NATIONWIDE
Subject to NSPS
Not Subject to NSPS
Total
Mean
BACT Rate
Number (gr/dscf)
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
5
0
5
.0052 +
0
.0052 ±
.0052 +
0
.0052 ±
.0052 +
0
.0052 ±
.0052 +
0
.0052 ±
.0052 ±
0
.0052 ±
I
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.06
.00
.00
Furnace
Carbon Monoxide
Mean
BACT Rate
Number (Ib/ton)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.900 ± .000
.900 ± .000
0
0
0
0
.900 ± .000
.900 ± .000
Partlculate Matter
Number
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
21
0
0
0
0
21
21
Mean
BACT Rate
(Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
.020 ± .000
.020 ± .000
0
0
0
0
.020 + .000
.020 ± .000
Reheat Furnace
Sulfur Dioxide
Mean
BACT Rate
Number (Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
18
0
0
0
0
18
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.550 + .000
.550 ± .000
0
0
0
0
.550 + .000
.550 + .000
Nitrogen Oxides
Mean
BACT Rate
Number (Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
21
0
0
0
0
21
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.250 + .000
.250 ± .000
0
0
0
0
.250 + .000
.250 ± .000
Carbon Monoxide
Mean
BACT Rate
Number (Ib/MM Btu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
21
0
0
0
0
21
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.040 +
.040 ±
0
0
0
0
.040 +
.040 ±
.000
.000
.000
.000
aRegfons omitted did not Issue a PSD permit for any electric arc furnace or reheat furnace between 1981 and mid-1984.
DB 81-84
-------
TABLE D-18. MEAN BACT EMISSION RATES FOR VARIOUS SOURCES
0
H-"
00
r.rtir.i.t. »..i.. lull., ntn-ia. iim^.o.ij.. _ CufeaJltmUl _ lalltllo QrMllr rto»m«i _
ii,i 11.11 a iiiii mil »t "! Hull of »M> Unit .f « l»» *
£>*. >u.r mcT !. t.L.lool *_b.r MCT MU I.I..IO.. »«».r MCT ! E.I,, Ion. IM.r OKI ««t. blntai IMtar WC1 « f.l.«l<».
A«»lt«U Concrrt. PlMtt
Swkjvct to INK ] .040 t .000 gr/feer
Nal MjKt to HSP5 0 0
ToUl » .(HO t .000 frtttct
11P' i! in! s:. =;:s:
Car^M RlMfc PlMtt*/
«i*t* HMt ftolUr 1 9.30 t 0.0 Ib/lW Mv 1 .130 1 .000 lb/HN MM
Too4 ProcMlIng P-Uitti*/
Prtjy«rtt la*> 1 .300 i .000 flt/tlKf
,
Rotary Klin 3 .)«0 i .000 H/tM 2 I.4B t 0.00 , Ib/tM 2 .730 i .000 U/tMfc
olln PnMr«*ttn|) rlwiti*
»*» Mill 1 -0» t .000 fr/tlKf
Uric *cl« tMwU ' .
S^jvt to «r» 2 5.00 i 0.00 U/tOfl*
n trtj«ct 1* MT« 0 0 .
lot*) ? 3.00 i 0.00 Ib/ton
PltM^Wt* Moch PlMtWOr|«r .
s^jKt u M^S t .050 1 .OH ifc/tB* o e fc o o h
HOI hhjwct to ten o o . i ,«o i .000 ik/toC i .if* t -no u/t«<
InUl 2 .050 t .014 Ib/tM 1 .4)0 i ,000 Ik/ton" 3 ,l*t 1 .010 Ib/ton*
PKMtlut* Ptoe* ritntt/
CaltlMr
SMJ«ct to WF3 ' 0 0 h 0 0 -"k" ° ~k° 9 ""* ° ° *~fc
Not S.fcJ«cl to MSP] 4 .1)7 J .000 Ik/ton* 4 .074 t .000 Ifc/lc-? 4 .112 t -MO Ik/tV 4 11. M i 0.00 U/tta* 4 .OM i .000 Ik/lM^
lot.l 1 .1)2 i .000 Ik/tM^ 4 .AT4 1 .000 Ife/ton* 4 .772 t .000 Ifc/tM* 4 11, M i 0.00 Ik/ton* 4 .000 1 .000 Ik/to*'
Prfftarr AlMlitM Ita^KtlM
P)wt«/Petreo* Krmp
S«bjKt to HWS o 1 0 0 0 ..
ot S^J^t to MSPJ 2 4S.O i 7.07 Ik/ton? 1 H5 * 0.0 lk/t«£
»«t«l 2 4S.O i 7.0? Ik/to*' , 1 23S 1 0.0 1fc/tonh
PrlMry »l«lnt* MNCtloM
Pt«m»/AM4> «.* PlMt
hijoct to «PS
Ifcjt fabjoct to MFS
T«t*l
blhrlc Acid Plwiti
hojtet to «SW 3 4.00 t B.OO »k/t«C
Hot SrtJ«ct K> ten 1 4.00 i 0.00 Ik/ton*
Total 4 4.00 t 0.00 lk/t
-------
APPENDIX E
CHRONOLOGY OF EACT/NSPS EMISSION RATES
-------
l\l I S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS N
B o.i«o i N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
A O.H15 f
U 0,1 BO t
T 0.175 t
0.170 +
E 0.165 ^
M 0.160 +
I 0.155 +
S 0.150 +
S 0.145 f
I 0.140 +
II 0.135 t
N 0.130 +
0.125 t
R 0.120 +
A 0.115 f
E oilos t NSPS Level
0,100 + S , S N S SNS S S N S S
- 0.095 +
0.090 +
L 0.085 + '
p 0.000 + S N
/ 0.075 +
M 0.070 +
M 0.065 t S S
O.OAO + S
B 0.055 +
T 0.050 .+
U 0.045 + N
0.040 +
0.035 +
0.030 t £>
0.025 +
0.020 +
0.015 + S
0.010 t
0.005 ^
0.000 +
MAR79 SEP79 APR80 QCTBO MAY81 NOV81 JUN82 HEC82 JUL83 FEB84 AUG8-1 MAR85 SEP8 =
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-l. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL/WOOD-FIRED INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
I
ro
i. a ^
i .t.
K
A
i:
T 1.1
E
M
I
S 1.2
S
,1
0
N
1 .0
K
A
T
E
0.8
* =
S =
N =
NSPS Level
Emission Units Subject to NSPS
Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
s*
0.6
0.4
0.2
o.'o +
MAR79 SEP79
S»
StSJt Si
APRBO OCT30
S N
N
NOVB1 JUN82 DEC82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
+ + + ._, f + _
JULB3 FEB81 C.UGB4 MAR85 SEPB5
FIGURE E-2.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL/WOOD-FIRED INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
DB 79-R4
-------
I
GO
B
A
C
T
E
M
I
S
S
I
0
N
R
A
T
E
1.0
0.9
0.8
O.X
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0. 1
N =
NSPS Level
Emission Units Subject to NSPS
Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0.0
»S
»S
S* »S
*S S J[3
S * N
N S
*S N Mt
MAR79 SEF79 APR80 OCTBO MAY81 NOV81 JUNB2
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
JUL83 FEB8-1 AUD81 MAR85 SEP85
FIGURE E-3.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL/WOOD-FIRED INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
I
-fa
1.0
B
A
C 0.9
T
M 0.8
I
S
S
I 0.7
0
N
R 0.6
A
T
E
0.5
L
B 0.4
0.3
0,2
0.1
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0.0 +
-NS.
N
-S-SN-SS N
S
S N
NSPS Level
MAR79 SEP79 APR80 OCT80 MAY81
NOV81 JUN82 DEC82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
___t 1 + + + ._
JUL83 FEB81 AUG84 MARB5 SEP8S
FIGURE E-4.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS/SOLID, LIQUID, GAS COMBINATION FUEL
DB 79-84
-------
A
c
T
E
M
I
S
!3
I
a
N
R
A
T
E
3.0
2.5
2.0
1 .5
1 .0
0.5
* = NSPS Level
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0.0
»SS» S* N S*
SI S«- S» SI St
N
N
N
MAR79 SEP79 APR80 OCT80 MAY81 NOVB1 JUNB2 DECB2
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
JUL83 FEB81
AUG84
MARB5 SEPB5
FIGURE E-5. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS/SOLID, LIQUID, GAS COMBINATION FUEL
DB 79-84
-------
1.1
i.o
A
C 0.9
T
E
M O.B
I
S
S
I 0.7
0
N
R 0.6
A
T
E
0.5
L
B 0.4
*
S
N
NSPS Level
Emission Units Subject to NSPS
Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
SI
s»
NSS* S* N S*S*
S* S* N
S*
0.3
0.
0.1
0.0 +
+ 1 + + + + + + 1 + + + +_
MAR79 SEP79 APRBO OCT80 MftYBl NOV81 JUNB2 HEC82 JUL83 FEBB1 ftUGBI MAR85 SEP85
HONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-6. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS/SOLID, LIQUID, GAS COMBINATION FUEL
DB 79-84
-------
m
i
B
A
C
T
E
M
I
S
S
I
0
N
'R
A
T
E
.30 +
.29 +
.28 +
.27 +
.26 +
.25 +
.24 +
.23 +
.22 +
.21 +
.20
.19
.18
.17
. 1
,15
, 14 +
,13 +
+
12
* = NSPS Level
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
+
+ <
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ j
+
+
+
JUN79
tss*
sss*
s
s* ss*
SEF'79
IIEC79
ftPROO
JUL80
OCTBO
tSSSK S*
JAN81 MAY81 ftUGBl
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
*s
*s
MAR82 JUN82 SEP82 DEC82
JULB3
FIGURE E-7.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL-FIRED UTILITY BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
i.s + * = NSPS Level
[ S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
1.4 + N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
i
i
i ,:s t
B i
A i
C1.2+ * * * *S *S S*
T I
I S*
E 1 .1 t
Ml l *S
I I
S 1.0 +
S I
I I
0 O.V t S S
N I
R 0.8 t
m A i s st ss*
I T I S#
00 E 0.7 + SV
I
I S 'S«
0.6 + * ** ** »ss» * ss* * is* s* rs
L I Bt
B I S
/ 0.5 + S
HI S S* t
H I S
0.4 + S
B- I
T I
U 0.3 t
I S
0.2 t S S S
I
I S
0.1 +
I S
I
0.0 +
__t 1 + + + + + + + 4. + 4 + + 4. 4._
JUN79 SEP79 DEC79 APR80 JULBO OCT80 JrtK'81 MAYB1 |1UG81 K'OUBl MAR82 JUN82 SEPB2 HEC82 APR83 JUL83
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-8. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL-FIRED UTILITY BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
0.7
B
A
C 0.6
T
E
H
I
S 0.5
S
I
0
N
R 0.4
A
T
E
0,3
0.2
0.1
0.0
* = NSPS Level
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
VS S * S *SS* «S* SSSS«
5 S
S
*S S
*SSS
S» S
JUN79 SEP79 DEC79 APR80 JUL80 OCT80 JAN81 MAYB1 AUG81 NOV81 MAR82 JUN82 SEP82 PEC82 APRB3 JUL83
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-9.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR COAL-FIRED UTILITY BOILERS
DB 79-84
-------
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
.031 +
.030 +
.029 +
.028 +
.027 +
.026 +
.025 +
.024 t
.023 +
.022 +
.021 +
.020 +
.019 +
.018 +
.017 -f
.016 t
.015 +
.014 t
.013 f
.012 +
.011 t
.010 +
.009 +
.008 +
.007 +
.006 +
.005 -f
.004 +
.003 +
002 -f
001 +
000 +
_ I
MAR79
NSPS Level
SEF'79
_ _ _ 1
APRBO
OCTBO
MAYB1 NOV81 JUN82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
DECB2
JUL83
FEK84
AUG84
MAR85
SEF'85
FIGURE E-10. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR THERMAL DRYERS AT COAL PREPARATION PLANTS
DB 79-84
-------
o.is + * = NSPS Level
J S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
0.14 t
I
I
0.13 + SI S» SI S* SI
I
B I
A 0.12 +
C I
T I
0,11 +
E I
H I
J 0.10+
S I
S I
I 0.09 +
0 I
N I
0.08 \
R I
A I
T 0.07 +
E I S* S»
I
- 0.06 +
I
G I
R 0.05 +
/ I
D I
S 0.04 +
C I
F I
0.03 +
I
I
0.02 +
I
0.01 +
I
I
0.00 t
_+ + 1 1 + 1 + + 1 + + + + J+ +__ +_
JAN81 MARB1 MAYB1 JUL81 SEP81 NOV81 JAN82 HrtR82 MrtY82 JULB2 SEF'82 NOV82 DEC82 MAR83 ftPR83 JUN83
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-ll. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR LIME KILNS AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
DB 79-84
-------
I
t'
ro
B 7
A
C
T
E 6
M
I
S
S
I 5
0
N
R
A 4
T
.
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
-S S-
NSPS Level
DECBO FEB81 APR81 JUNB1 AUG81 OCT81 DEC81 FEB82 APRB2 JUN82 AUG82 OCT82 DECB2 JftWBJ MAR83 MAYB3
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE £-12. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR
EMISSION RATES FOR LIME KILNS AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
DB 79-84
-------
m
i1
C/J
0.045
0.040
E
ft
C 0.035
T
E
M
I 0,030
S
S
I
0
N 0.025
R
A
T
E 0.020
G
R 0.015
D
s'
c
F 0.010
0.005
1 S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
0.000
-f --------- + ---
MAR79 SEP79
NSPS Level
-S--S-
APR80 OCT80 MAYB1
NOV81
JUN82
[IECB2
+
JUL83
FEP8-1 AUG84 HARB5 SEP85
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-13.
A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR RECOVERY FURNACES AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
DB 79-84
-------
5.0
4.5
K
A
C
E
M
I 3.5
S
S
I
0 3.0
N
R
A 2.5
T
E
- 2.0
P
F
H 1.5
1 .0
0.5 +
S = Emission Units Subject to- NSPS
-S--S-S-
-ss-
-S--S--S-
NSPS Level
0.0
-- +
MAR79
SEP79 APR80
--- + + ---
OCT80 MAY81
+ __.
NOV81
I
JUN82
DECB2
JUL83
+
FEB84
--_ + + + _
AUG81 MAR85 SEP85
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-14. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR
EMISSION RATES FOR RECOVERY FURNACES AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
DB 79-84
-------
m
i
0.20
0. IB
Ei
A
C 0.16
E
M
I
S
s
I
0
N
0.14
0. 12
R 0.10
A
T
E
O.OB
Ei 0.06
T
0
N 0.04
0.02
0.00
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
MAR7V SEP79
-ss-s ss sss-
+
~
APR80
1
T
OCT80
_ I _ _
T
MAY81
~ "~ T ~" "* l " t
NOVB1 JUN82 DEC82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
JUL83 FEB81
MAR85 SEP85
FIGURE £-15. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR SMELT DISSOLVING TANKS AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
DB 79-84
-------
0 . C 1 B
I S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
0,016
B
A
C 0.011
T
E
M
I 0.012
S
I
0
N 0, 010
R
A
T
n i o.oon
1
O1
1
B 0.006
T
0
N
0.004
O.Q02
o.ooo ^
nt
NSPS Level
s-ss-s ss s s---s s s
s
\R79 SEF'79 APRBO OCTBO MAY81 NOV81 JUNB2 DEC82 JUL83 FEB84 AUG81 MARB5 SEPB5
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-16. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR
EMISSION JRATES FOR SMELT DISSOLVING TANKS AT KRAFT PULP MILLS
DB 79-84
-------
B
A
C
T
E
H
I
S
S
1
a
N
R
A
T
E
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
£00 +
575 +
550 +
525 t
500 t
475 +
450 t
425 +
400 +
375 f
350 +
325 +
300
275
250
T> «-,
200
175
150
125
100
075
050
025
000
+-S-
SEP79
NSPS Level
DEC79
AF'RBO
JUL80
4
OCT80
JAN81 MAY81 AUG81
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
NOUB1
MARB2
JUN82
SEP82
DECS:
FIGURE E-17. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR KILNS AT LIME MANUFACTURING PLANTS
DB 79-84
-------
m
i
oo
330
270
B
ft
e:
T 240
F
M
I 210
S
S
I
0 180
N
R
A 150
T
E
- 120
P
P
M 90
60
30
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
S S
-LS-
-s--s-
DEC79 APRSO JUL80 OCT80
MftYBl AUG81 NOVB1
JUNB2 SEPB2 [IECB2 ftF'R83 JUL83 OCT83
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-18. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR CLAUS SULFUR RECOVERY UNITS AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
DB 79-84
-------
m - o,6o
i
1 S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
i
B i
A I
C I
T« (\ n i _ _ Q _ . c o o
1 tUU T -» ~ 3 - .______ ___-__ ____ ^ ___________ _ _ _ __ _, _ ^ ._. _- . g.
1 Level
E 0.95 +
H I
I 0.90 + 55 S
S I
S 0.85 + S
I I
U 0.80 f S S
N I
0.75 t S
R I
(\ 0.70 +
T I
E 0.65 +
I
L 0.55 +
B I
/ 0.50 +
1 I
0 0.45 +
0 I
0 0.40 +
I
L 0.35 +
EI I
0.30 +
0 I
F 0.25 +
I
C 0.20 +
0 I
K 0.15+
E I
0.10 +
I
0.05 +
I
0.00 t
_ + f + f + + + + 1 + * + + ,
MAR79 JUN79 SEF79 DEC79 APRBO JUL80 OCT80 JAN81 MAY81 AUG81 NOVB1 MAR82 JUN82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-19. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR FCCU CATALYST REGENERATORS AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
DB 79-84
-------
I
ro
o
500
450
B
A
C
T tOO
E
M
I 3f.O
S
s
I
0 300
N
K
A 250
T
E
- 200
F
F
M 150
100
50
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
-s-s-
0 -f
MAR79 JUN79 SEP79 DEC79
NSPS
Level
APRBO JULBO OCT80 JANB1 MfiYSl AUG81 NOV81 HAR82 JUN82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-20. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS CARBON MONOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR FCCU CATALYST REGENERATORS AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
DB 79-84
-------
I
IN3
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
H = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0.35
A 0.30
C
T
E
M
I 0 . 25
S
S
I
0
N
0,20
R
A
T
E
- 0.15
G
R
D
S 0.10
c Level
0.05
0.00 t
_ + ------- + ------- + ------- i ------- f ------- + ------- + ------- + ------- + ------- + ------- + ------- + ------- + -------- 1 ------- + ------- + -
JUN79 SEP79 DEC79 flPRBO JUL80 OCT80 JAN81 MAY81 ftUGSl NQVB1 MAR82 JUNB2 SEPB2 UECB2 APRB3 JUL83
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
s s s-,ss-_ss S--S..S-..S-sS-s S
FIGURE E-21. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR FUEL GAS COMBUSTION DEVICES AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
DB 79-84
-------
no
ro
0.30
s 0.21
i
o
N
0. IE)
R
E 0.15
L 0.12
0 0.09
N
0.06
0.03
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
0.00
-S--S-S-
.4
APRBO
JULBO OCTBO JAN81
4
MAY81
4
IMJG81
4
K'OVBl
_NSPS__Leyel.
4
MOR82
4 ------- 4...
JUN82 SEF'82
--- 4
HEC82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
4 ------- 4 ------- 4 ------- 4_
JULB3 OCTB3 FEH81 MAYB1
FIGURE 1-22. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION RATES FOR KILNS AT PORTLAND CEMENT PLANTS
DB 79-84
-------
ro
co
0.11
o. 10
A 0.09
c
T
E 0.08
H
I
S
S 0.07
I
0
N
0.06
R
A
T
E 0.05
L 0.04
B
0 0.03
N
0.02
0.01
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
0.00
- +
JUL80
_NSP_S.Lfivel_-_-
+ +__.
OCTBO JAN81
1
HAYB1
+
AUG81
+
NOVB1
+ ---
MAR82
+
JUNB2
+ --
SEP82
1
[IECB2
+ ---
APRB3
+
JUL83
+ -
OCTB.I
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE 1-23. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS FLUORIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR ANODE BAKE PLANTS AT PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLANTS
DB 79-84
-------
ro
2.00
1 .7'
1 .50
SI
1 .00
0.75
0.50
* =
S =
N =
NSPS Level
Emission Units Subject to NSPS
Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0,00
JUL80 OCT80 JANB1
I .
MAY81
AUG81 NOV81 MAR82 JUN82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
SEFB2
DECS:
t
APR83
JUL83 OCT83
FIGURE E-24. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) FOR BACT AND NSPS FLUORIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR POTROOM GROUPS AT PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLANTS
DB 79-84
-------
450
400
B 350
A
C
T
E 300
M
I
S
S
I
0
N
50
00
150
* =
S =
N =
NSPS Level
Emission Units Subject to NSPS
Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
100
50
0 +
--+
MAR79
s» s* *ssr
*s
S# ISSS S* S»««SS
* S* N
S
S»
SS*
S*
S»
N
S»
... + + + +
SEP79 AFR80 OCT80 HAY81
+ + +
NOVB1 JUN82 PEC82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
.__ + + ---
JUL83 FEB84
-_- + ^ +
AUG84 MAR85
+
SEP85
FIGURE 1-25. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR GAS-FIRED STATIONARY GAS' TURBINES
DB 79-84
-------
ro
en
150
140
130
120
B
A
C 110
T
E 100
H
I
S 90
S
I
0 BO
N
R 70
A
T
E 60
SO
t
P
M 40
30
10
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
-S E-
- NS-N-
*S-
MAR79 SEP79 APRBO OCT80 MAY81
S
NOVB1 JUN82 DEC82
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
JUL83
FEB84
+ 1 +
AUGB4 MAR8S SEP85
FIGURE £-26. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) 'OF BACT AND NSPS SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR OIL-FIRED STATIONARY GAS TURBINES
-------
* = NSPS Level
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
B
A
C
T
E
M
I
S
S
I
0
N
R
A
T
E
-
P
F
H
150 4
1
1
MO 4
1
1
130 4
120 4
1
1
110 4
1
1
100 4
1
1
90 t
1
1
80 4
1
70 4
1
1
60 4
1
50 4
1
I
<0 4
1
f '
30 4
1
20 4
1
1
10 4
S* S» S* S»
s»
S* S» M S» S*
0 4
--4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
MAR79 SEP79 APRBO OCT80 HAY81 NOV81 JUNB2 DECB2 JULB3 FEBB4 AUG84 MAR83 SEP83
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-27 A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN, OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR OIL-FIRED STATIONARY GAS TURBINES
DB 79-84
-------
E
M
I 12
S
S
I
0
N 10
R
A
T
E 8
* = NSPS Level
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
0 +
_t + - + + + + + + 4 + + __i + +
OCTBO JAN81 MATB1 AUOB1 NOV81 MAR82 JUNB2 SEF'82 PEC82 ftf'R83 JUL83 OCT83 FEB84
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE E-28. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION DIESEL AND DUAL FUEL ENGINES
DB 79-84
-------
ho
50
B
A 45
C
T
E 40
M
I
S
S 35
I
0
N
30
R
A
T
E 25
G 20
/
H
P
- 15
H
R
10
* = NSPS Level
S = Emission Units Subject to NSPS
N = Emission Units Not Subject to NSPS
N N N
N S» N
* Si
N
S
NN
N
N N N
S*
N N
SEP79 DEC79 ftPRBO JULBO OCTBO JftNBl MAYB1 AUG81 NOVB1 HAR82 JUNB2 SEP82 DECB2 APRB3 JULB3 OCTB3
MONTH OF ISSUANCE
FIGURE £-29. A CHRONOLOGY (BY PSD PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) OF BACT AND NSPS NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSION RATES FOR STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION GAS ENGINES
DB 79-84
-------
|