U.S. EPA REGION 6 EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING
PROGRAM: EVALUATION OF RESULTS
NOVEMBER 1989
TECHNICAL SECTION
WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BRANCH
WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION
U.S. ERA-REGION 6
1445 ROSS AVENUE
DALLAS, TX 75202-2733
INORGANICS SECTION
HOUSTON BRANCH
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ERA-REGION 6
HOUSTON, TX 77074
-------
U.S. EPA REGION 6 EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING
PROGRAM: EVALUATION OF RESULTS
Philip A. Crocker1, Terry A. Hollister2, Abel Euresti2
and David Neleigh1
technical Section
Water Quality Management Branch
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
2Inorganics Section
Houston Branch
Environmental Services Division
6608 Hornwood Drive
Houston, TX 77074
November 1989
-------
Table of Contents
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION 1
Background 1
Purpose and Obj ectives 2
METHODS AND MATERIALS 2
Selection of Facilities 2
Sample Collection, Shipping and Storage 2
Toxicity Testing Procedures 3
Data Compilation and Evaluation 5
Qual ity Assurance 7
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 8
Spreadsheet of Effluent Toxicity Results 8
Comparative Sensitivity of Test Methods 8
Comparative Toxicity of Industrial and Municipal Discharges... 9
Potential Effects of Discharges on Receiving Waters 10
CONCLUSIONS 11
RECOMMENDATIONS 12
LITERATURE CITED 14
FIGURES 15
TABLES 22
APPENDICES 27
-------
FIGURES
Figure 1. Relative Sensitivity of Daphnia. Fathead minnow and
Algal Tests 16
Figure 2. Relative Sensitivity of Daphnia and Fathead Minnow
Tests 17
Figure 3. Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities
to Daphnia pulex 18
Figure 4. Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities
to the Fathead Minnow 19
Figure 5. Relative Toxicity of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants
to Daphnia. Fathead Minnow and Alga 20
Figure 6. Percentage of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant
Effluents Tested Where Substances Other than Chlorine
May be Influencing Toxicity .21
TABLES
Table 1. List of Water Bodies in Region 6 Which Have the
For Instream Toxicity 23
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: U.S. EPA Region 6 Effluent Toxicity Data 26
APPENDIX B: Relative Sensitivity of Effluent Toxicity Tests 67
B.I: 48 h Daphnia pulex. 8 d Fathead minnow and 96 h algal
Tests 68
B.2: 48 h Daphnia pulex and 8 d Fathead Minnow Tests 69
APPENDIX C: Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Municipal
Discharges 70
C.I: Plastics Materials and Resins (SIC Code 2821) 71
C.2: Industrial Organic Chemicals (SIC Code 2869) 72
C.3: Petroleum Refining (SIC Code 2911) 73
C.4: Plating and Polishing (SIC Code 3471) 74
C.5: Municipal Sevage treatment Plants (SIC Code 4952) 75
C.6: Federal Facilities (SIC Code 9711) 76
11
-------
Acknowledgements
The assistance of Delia Oteiza, of the Environmental Services Division
(ESD), Facilities Compliance Section, whom coordinated inspections, is
much appreciated. We are grateful to James Olander, of the Enforcement
Branch, whom developed inspection lists and included the facilities
which we considered to be of high priority. We thank the ESD Facilities
Compliance and Field Activities staff who collected samples during
inspections. The efforts of Carl Young, of the ESD Environmental
Analysis Section, and Glen Bingham, of the Permits Branch, in retrieving
and interpreting STORET and PCS data, respectively, were appreciated.
We thank Scott Wilson and Jane Watson of the Permits Branch who provided
stream flow data received from the states. We are grateful to Barbara
Schrodt of the Construction Grants Branch for producing the pie charts
and the report cover. Additionally, we acknowledge the valuable reviews
of this report by Robert Vickery, Robert Elliott, Michael Bastian,
Willie Lane, and Bill Peltier (ESD, Region 4).
111
-------
INTRODUCTION
Background
Although the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (EPA)
Laboratory has had an effluent toxicity testing program for over 10
years, the emphasis was increased in Fiscal Year (FY) 1984 with regard
to both types and numbers of tests conducted. Initially, acute testing
with Daphnia and mysid shrimp served to complement the EPA "second
round" permitting approach effective during FY 1982-87, at which time
effluent toxicity screening with those species was required for most
major industrial permittees. This initiated permittees on the whole
effluent toxicity testing concept, and familiarized them with the
methodology and data interpretation. Along with the self-monitoring
data, the EPA Region 6 Laboratory results served to establish an
effluent toxicity database. Many data were also entered into EPA's
national database, the Complex Effluent Toxicity Testing Information
System (CETIS). As the capability of the Regional Laboratory improved
and testing methods became more sophisticated, the purposes of the
program diversified. Starting FY 1985-86, standard short-term chronic
tests were conducted in conjunction with Daphnia tests to address inter-
species differences in sensitivity. The chronic methods included 8 d
fathead minnow, and to a limited extent, 7 d Ceriodaphnia. and 96 h
alga (Selenastrum capricornutum) tests. Also, during this period, an
important purpose of the testing was to screen facilities to determine
the need for water quality based control measures.
In FY 1987, the Region developed a "third round" permitting policy to
be implemented during FY 1988-93, which included toxicity testing
requirements for all major NPDES permittees. Since initiation of this
policy, the need for the Region to screen facilities prior to permit
renewal has diminished. However, the need to assess the sensitivity and
compare the newly developed fresh and salt water testing methodologies
was considered important. The tests were utilized in an effluent
testing program and in numerous water quality-related special studies.
Additionally, there was a continued need to establish an effluent
toxicity database for discharges in the Region, particularly those which
could adversely affect receiving waters. Data were provided to the
states and, through inspection reports, the permittees also became aware
of the toxicity of their discharges.
An ancillary function, not initially envisioned, developed from the
Clean Water Act amendments of 1987. Under Section 304(1), the states
and/or EPA are required to list water bodies which are known to be, or
are suspected of being, impaired by toxic pollutants. As part of this
process, the states are required to evaluate available water quality as
well as effluent chemical and toxicity data. The Section 304(1)
activities are viewed as an agency priority, and the needs of the states
will play an important role in the future of the effluent testing
program, particularly with regard to identifying toxic discharges and
shifting more to special studies to evaluate toxicity of water bodies,
instead of effluents alone.
-------
-2-
Purpose and Objectives
The purpose of this report was to compile and evaluate whole effluent
toxicity testing data generated by the EPA Regional Laboratory. The
specific objectives are identified as follows:
1. Compile and present all effluent toxicity data collected from FY 1984
through mid-FY 1988. A spreadsheet was developed which includes
toxicity data, plus additional information and data on the facilities,
receiving waters and effluent chemical characteristics.
2. Compare relative sensitivity of several standard test organisms and
methods, including 24-48 h Daphnia pulex acute test, 8 d fathead minnow
(Pimephales promelas) embryo/larval survival and teratogenicity
(chronic) test and the 96 h algal (Selenastrum capricornutum) chronic
growth test.
3. Evaluate and compare effluent toxicity for various facility types
(Standard Industrial Classifications=SIC Codes), including: municipal
sewage treatment plants (SIC Code 4952); Plastics Materials and Resins
(2821); Industrial Organic Chemicals (2869) ; Petroleum Refining (2911) ;
Plating and Polishing (3471); and Federal Facilities (9711).
4. Evaluate where receiving waters could be affected by whole effluent
toxicity, based on available instream dilution.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Selection of Facilities
An average of about 80 facilities were selected per year for effluent
toxicity testing during the period FY 1984-88. About two-thirds of the
facilities were selected by the Water Quality Management Branch. These
facilities were selected primarily on the basis of having the potential
to affect the receiving waters (dilution ratio < 100:1), or because they
discharged to water bodies with known or suspected water quality
problems. The Permits Branch selected the remaining one-third of the
facilities. They were selected on the basis of having expiring NPDES
permits, such that toxicity data could be considered prior to permit
reissuance.
Sample Collection. Shipping and Storage
Single grab samples were collected from process wastewater discharges
by compliance inspectors during facility inspections. Samples were
placed in coolers, iced, and shipped to the Regional Laboratory through
an overnight courier service. Standard chain of custody procedures
(U.S. EPA 1978) were followed in processing of samples. Samples were
stored in a refrigerator at 4 C until test initiation. Testing was
initiated within 36 h of sample collection.
The decision to collect grab samples was based on resource contraints.
Grab samples provide a measure of instantaneous toxicity and spikes are
not masked by dilution. They may yield representative results if the
-------
-3-
wastewater treatment system has a long (>14 d) retention time.
Composite samples integrate toxicity spikes and may be more
representative of average conditions, and may provide more
representative results when the retention time is short (<14 d) (U.S.
EPA 1985a) . From this rationale, it may be more appropriate to consider
the data as screening results which are most representative for
facilities haveing longer retention times.
Toxicity Testing Procedures
Culture of all test organsims and toxicity testing was conducted at
the Regional Laboratory, Houston, Texas. Culture and testing
methodology is presented in U.S. EPA 1985a; 1985b; and 1988. The test
procedures are summarized below.
Species
Test Type
(Duration)
Test
Endpoints
Test Container
(Test Volume)
Freshwater
Daphnia pulex
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Acute (48h)
Chronic (7d)
Survival
Survival;
Reproduction
50 ml glass
(50 ml)
50 ml glass
(15 ml)
Fathead minnow Chronic (8d)
(Pimephales promelas)
Alga Chronic (96h)
(Selenastrum capricornutum)
Saltwater
Mysid Shrimp Acute (48h)
(Mysidopsis bahia or
M. almvra)
Sheepshead Minnow Chronic (8d)
(Cvprinodon variegatus)
Survival; 400 ml plastic
Teratogenicity (250 ml)
Cell Growth
Survival
20x150 mm glass
(25 ml)
400 ml plastic
(250 ml)
Survival; 400 ml plastic
Teratogenicity (250 ml)
During FY 1984-85, in the majority of cases, single species tests were
run on effluent samples. Testing with multiple (two or three species)
was initiated during FY 1986 and continued through 1988, for the purpose
of reducing uncertainty related to species sensitivity. The high level
of resources required for culturing mysids and testing Ceriodaphnia
resulted in limited use of those test organisms during FY 1986-88.
Generally because of resource limitations only single test species were
used in testing marine effluents. Usually these consisted of the mysid
acute test (through FY 1985) or the sheepshead minnow chronic (FY 1986-
88) .
-------
-4-
To better evaluate potential toxicity due to total residual chlorine
(TRC), chlorinated effluent samples were tested "as is" as well as
following dechlorination with sodium thiosulfate. The dechlorination
procedure consisted of addition of 1.0 ml of a 100 mg/1 sodium
thiosulfate (Na2S203 - 5H20) solution per liter of sample. This procedure
is recommended for dechlorination of wastewater samples prior to BOD
analysis (APHA 1980). Following this procedure, samples were reanalyzed
to verify that TRC was nondetectable.
For the most part, a dilution factor of 0.5 was used in diluting
effluent samples for testing, which resulted in effluent concentrations
of 100%, 50%, 25%, 12% and 6%. This scheme was occasionally modified
to accommodate highly toxic efflents. In all tests, except for the
algal test, culture water was used as the performance control, and as
the diluent. The culture water consisted of dechlorinated, carbon
filtered City of Houston tap water. Marine tests incorporated the same
water, supplemented with sea salts (Hawaiian Marine Mix ) . The chemical
makeup of the freshwater most closely resembled moderately hard water
(described in U.S. EPA 1985a), although alkalinity was slightly lower.
The algal culture medium did not include the complexing agent EDTA.
The approximate composition of the control/dilution water is presented
below.
pH Alkalinity Hardness Conductivity Salinity
mg/1 as CaC03 uMHO/cm o/oo
Freshwater 8.0 45 85 400 0
Algal Culture 7.3 4 14 100 0
Medium (Freshwater)
Saltwater 8.3 37,000 20
A primary advantage in using a standard water source, as was done in
this study, is that it makes results more comparable for different
effluents, categories of facilities, and collection times. A
disadvantage is that this does not take into account the site-specific
chemical characteristics of receiving waters, which could influence
instream effects. Resources were not available to collect ambient water
samples above the discharge, for use as control/dilution water.
In all cases the type of test species usedfresh or salt waterwas
dictated by the effluent salinity, i.e., for effluents <5 o/oo,
freshwater organisms were used, and at > 5 o/oo, saltwater organisms
were used. For brackish samples with salinities of 3-5 o/oo, "salinity
controls" were included to determine the effects of salinity on the test
organisms. This treatment involved exposing test organisms to culture
water to which sea salts had been added, to achieve the same salinity
as the effluent sample. The approach to select the test organisms based
-------
-5-
on effluent rather than receiving water salinity is adequate for
screening, as well as for consistency and quality control. It should
be noted that preliminary information, from EPA Region 4 and the
Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, suggests that freshwater test
organisms serve as viable surrogates to marine species and therefore can
be used in assessing impacts to marine receiving waters (Bill Peltier,
Personal Communication).
For the majority of tests, conductivity, salinity, hardness,
alkalinity, pH, DO, and temperature were measured initially. If
mortality occurred during the test, then DO was measured every 24 h
thereafter. Test temperatures were maintained at 24+1 C. During FY
1984-86, if no significant mortality (i.e., > 10% mortality in 100%
effluent) occurred in acute tests during the first 24 h, the test was
terminated. Because it was recognized that acute effects could occur
after longer exposures, starting in FY 1986 acute tests were continued
to 48 h, regardless of effect. Mortality as well as non-lethal
endpoints (if applicable) were monitored every 24 h. Acute LC50 and
chronic EC50 values were calculated using either trimmed Spearman-Karber
(pre-April 1987) or Probit (April 1987-88) procedures (U.S. EPA 1985a).
Significance of survival or reproduction in given treatments was
analyzed using Dunnett's Test and ANOVA at P=0.95 (U.S. EPA 1985b).
Ninety-five percent confidence intervals around the LC/EC50 values were
calculated if possible.
Data Compilation and Evaluation
All data generated from FY 1984 through mid-1988 were compiled in a
LOTUS 1-2-3 spreadsheet. Effluent toxicity and other data and
information entered into the spreadsheet included: NPDES number, outfall
number, SIC code, location, receiving water name, stream flows,
discharge flows, instream waste concentration, sample collection date,
effluent physical/chemical characteristics, test organism, test length,
LC50, mortality in 100% effluent, Lowest Observed/No Observed Effect
Concentrations (LOEC/NOEC), comments, and potential for instream
effects. A description of the elements, and the spreadsheet are
contained in Appendix A.
Relative toxicity comparisons were made using several test methods for
the following municipal and industrial facility types: Municipal Sewage
Treatment Plants (SIC Code 4952) ; Plastics Materials and Resins (2821);
Industrial Organic Chemicals (2869) ; Petroleum Refining (2911) ; Plating
and Polishing (3471) ; and Federal Facilities (9711).
Relative toxicity was defined in terms of the commonly applied 0.5
dilution factor, as shown on the following page.
-------
-6-
Term Definition
Nontoxic No significant effect in 100% effluent
Low Toxicity Significant mortality in 100% effluent;
LC50 or EC50=100% to 50% effluent
Medium Toxicity LC50 or EC50=50% to 25% effluent
High Toxicity LC50 < 25% effluent
These are not standard measures of toxicity, however, they are useful
for purposes of grouping and assessing data. The measures may not have
a direct bearing on potential water quality effects and are used only
for comparisons between SIC categories. Additional "side-by-side"
comparisons of the sensitivity of Daphnia. fathead minnow and algal
tests were also made, primarily using LC50 or EC50 as the basis for
ranking.
Potential for receiving water effects was evaluated by considering
instream waste concentration (IWC), along with the degree of toxicity.
IWC is the estimated percent effluent dilution in the receiving water
after mixing, calculated using the following equation:
Oe x 100
IWC(%) = Qe + Qs,
where Qe and Qs are average pipe flow and critical stream flow rates,
respectively. The following decision criteria, from the Technical
Support Document (U.S. EPA 1985c), and from the states' implementation
procedures or policy, were used to assess potential receiving water
effects:
-Potential for instream acute effects if IWC>LC1, where LC1=0.3 x
LC50.
-Potential for instream chronic effects if IWC^NOEL.
-The state of Texas draft water quality standards implementation
procedures incorporated the following assumptions:
-Estuaries have a 61 m (200 ft.) mixing zone with an IWC of
8% effluent at which chronic toxicity is evaluated;
-Lakes have a 30 m (100 ft.) mixing zone with an IWC of 16%
effluent at which chronic toxicity is evaluated; and
-The Houston Ship Channel has an IWC of 30% effluent at which
acute toxicity is evaluated.
-------
-7-
-The state of Louisiana has requested that a low flow value of
111,000 cfs be used for the Mississippi River.
-In some cases best professional judgement was used in assessing
potential effects in "no flow" situations (e.g., lakes), or where
stream and/or pipe flow data or mixing zone procedures were not
available.
Flow data were obtained primarily from the Permits Branch and
consisted of either 7Q2 or 7Q10, depending on the applicable state water
quality standards. These data were received from the states for
expiring NPDES permits. Stream flow data for other (non-expiring)
permittees was developed by Permits Branch using available information
including published reports containing low flows, USGS data, from
consultation with the states, and through the STORET Industrial
Facilities Discharge (IFD) File. The IFD file incorporates industrial
and municipal facility names, NPDES numbers, receiving water reach
numbers, reach names, locations, and Gage File data. The STORET Gage
File calculates stream flow for receiving waters of interest using the
Velz-Gumbel Graphical Technique (W.E. Gates & Associates, Inc. 1982).
Quality Assurance
This study followed QA/QC procedures and data quality objectives
presented in "FY 1987 Effluent Toxicity Testing Project Plan," developed
by the Water Quality Management Branch. In addition, a QA/QC plan
outlining calibration and standardization of instrumentation, test
procedures, and test organism maintenance is on file with the Houston
Laboratory's Quality Assurance Office. The Regional Laboratory followed
standard operating procedures (SOP's) adapted from acute and chronic
testing manuals. These SOP's were consistently followed by the same two
laboratory personnel throughout the study period.
SOP's included reference toxicant tests conducted monthly for each
test organism using copper sulfate (CuS04) . Control charts were
maintained for each reference toxicant-organism combination and
successive toxicity values (i.e., LC50 or EC50) were plotted to
determine any variation in sensitivity of the test organisms.
Once test results were received by the Regional Office, a review was
performed by the Water Quality Management Branch to ensure all necessary
data and calculations were provided. Any corrections or modifications
of the test results were made through communication with the lab. All
data presented met the requirements of acceptability pertaining to the
standard methods used. In all cases, control survival of fish and
daphnids was >90% The data entry procedure consisted of logging data
in a standard format; checking data; data entry into an IBM PC/AT;
retrieval and checking entered data; followed by final check and
correction. This protocol minimized errors in lab reports and during
transcription.
-------
-8-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spreadsheet of Effluent Toxicity Results
All whole effluent toxicity data, plus other related data and
information on the facility, effluent chemistry, and receiving waters
are presented in Appendix A. This database contains results for a total
of 520 effluent tests. Most of the data were collected under the
effluent testing program, although some were collected during special
projects (e.g., U.S. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, TX; Tinker Air
Force Base, Midwest City, OK; Tyler Pipe, Swan, TX) . Only data
collected by the Regional Laboratory were evaluated below.
Comparative Sensitivity of Test Methods
Fig. 1 summarizes results for 38 effluents where side-by-side testing
with the 96 h algal test and either 24-48 h Daphnia. 8 d fathead minnow
tests, or both, were conducted during FY 1987-88 (see also, Appendix
B.I). Sensitivity was evaluated by directly comparing EC/LC50 values
in terms of percent effluent. This evaluation included a wide variety
of facility types and potential pollutants. In 31 cases when all three
tests were conducted on the same samples, the algal test was most
sensitive in 16 (52%) of the cases; the Daphnia test in 5 (16%) of the
cases; and the minnow test was most sensitive in two (6%) cases. On
eight occasions (26%) the alga was equally sensitive to the Daphnia or
minnow tests, or both. In some respects this comparison may be biased
since the endpoint in the algal test reflects cell numbers, expressed
as EC50, compared to lethality of Daphnia and minnow, which is expressed
as LC50. Also, because the tests differed in duration, it is important
to realize that test sensitivity, rather than species sensitivity, is
being compared.
A total of 96 effluents from a variety of facility types were
concurrently tested with 24-48 h Daphnia and 8 d fathead minnow tests
(Fig. 2; Appendix B.2). Overall, the Daphnia test was more sensitive
in 40 (42%) of the cases, while the fathead minnow test was most
sensitive in 31 (32%) of the cases. The response was similar in 25
(26%) of the effluents tested. In situations where unionized ammonia
was considered to be the primary toxic agent, based on chemical
measurement of the effluent sample, the minnow was more sensitive than
the Daphnia. The opposite was true when Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
was the suspected primary toxic agent. These findings are consistent
with the published literature on the toxicity of these substances to
aquatic life, which is summarized on the following page (U.S. EPA 1985d;
1985e).
-------
-9-
Toxicant
Daphnia
Fathead Minnow
Total Residual Chlorine
Acute Value (LC50)
Chronic Value (ChV)
Un-Ionized Ammonia
27.7 ug/1
3.7 ug/1
105.2 ug/1
11.2 ug/1
Acute Value
Chronic Value
1.91 mg/1
0.53 mg/1
2.07 mg/1
0.22 mg/1
It is interesting that the Daphnia pulex acute test was generally
more sensitive than than the fathead minnow tests, in spite of the much
shorter test duration. This may be reflective of the relative
intolerance of Daphnia pulex to metals, TRC and/or chloramines.
The findings here give further weight to the multiple species testing
approach to account for ranges of tolerance of different species to
particular toxic agents. While the algal test was more sensitive to
effluents than either Daphnia or fathead minnow tests, it has generally
not been considered in EPA or state permitting programs. The test is
relevant in all discharge situations where aquatic plants are
ecologically important and/or where chronic tests more sensitive than
the daphnid/fathead minnow tests may be necessary to adequately protect
water quality.
One possible reason why the algal test has not been considered in
toxicity testing programs is the presumption that stimulatory effects
could complicate the procedure. In this investigation stimulation was
not a problem. Of the 38 Selenastrum tests conducted, only six (16%)
were stimulatory at one or more effluent concentrations (see Appendix
A) . In one situation a dechlorinated municipal effluent was
stimulatory. In several cases, when stimulation was found at low
effluent concentrations, toxicity ocurred at higher concentrations,
which indicates the presence of ammonia. In the few cases where
stimulation was demonstrated, we do not view this to be a problem which
would hinder assessment of toxicity: stimulatory effects show that the
effluent is nontoxic to the alga. However, this may indicate the
potential for eutrophication problems.
Comparison of Toxicity of Industrial
and Municipal Discharges
Results of toxicity tests on various industrial facility types are
summarized in Figs. 3 and 4, and Appendix C. Of the five industrial
categories evaluated, Industrial Organic Chemicals (SIC Code=2869) was
the most toxic to Daphnia. and least toxic to the fathead minnow.
Although the number of tests was limited (see Appendix C.5), federal
facilities (9711) ranked high with regard to the incidence and degree
-------
-10-
of effluent toxicity, particularly to the minnow, where all tests showed
an effect. The incidence of toxicity was lower for Daphnia (46% of tests
toxic), but the percent of tests exhibiting high toxicity was greater.
At least half of the samples tested from these federal facilities may
have been toxic due to TRC based on a comparison of measured effluent
values and generally accepted chronic values for TRC. The percentage
of samples from federal facilities with high effluent toxicity was
greater than other industrial categories, which suggests that this group
may deserve priority consideration with regard to toxics control.
Results were very similar for the plating and polishing facilities,
which ranked high in terms of incidence of toxicity to the fathead
minnow, and degree of effect to the Daphnia. Plastics Materials and
Resins (2821) and Petroleum Refining (2911) categories ranked
intermediately, with the fathead minnow test exhibiting a considerably
higher incidence of toxicity than the Daphnia. Overall, 100% effluent
from the five industrial categories investigated exhibited acute
toxicity to Daphnia about 30% to 55% of the time, while chronic toxicity
to the fathead minnow was found 45% to 100% of the time.
Fig. 5. summarizes the data for municipal sewage treatment plants.
The occurrence and degree of toxicity was relatively high for all three
types of tests, with 70%-90% of the effluents showing toxic effects,
depending on the species. Of those effluents exhibiting significant
toxicity, an extraordinarily high percentage were highly toxic to
Daphnia (55%) and alga (58%), compared to the fathead minnow (15%). The
findings were probably most reflective of the intolerance of these
species to TRC. However, it is clear from the data summarized in Fig.
6, that toxicity was not being caused by TRC exclusively. This figure
demonstrates that toxicity occurs in Daphnia. minnow and algal tests,
even when the effluent TRC was nondetectable, or after samples were
dechlorinated. It is plausible that TRC could have been present in some
of these samples at concentrations below the detection limit. However,
other substances may also be toxic, including ammonia. Toxic effects
considered not to be due to TRC were more apparent in minnow and algal
tests (>50% of effluents tested) compared to the Daphnia test (10%).
Overall, municipal effluents were more toxic than the industrial
categories investigated, which was probably influenced by, but not
limited to, the presence of TRC. These findings support the Region's
initiative to require dechlorination of major municipal discharges, and
Toxicity Reduction Evaluations (TRE's), which serve to identify and
control toxic pollutants, and are required under the present permitting
policy.
Potential Effects of Discharges
on Receiving Waters
Table 1 lists 109 discharges in EPA Region 6 which, based on
calculated instream dilution, could potentially result in toxic effects
to receiving waters. The list was developed using both acute and
chronic test results, and the critical stream flow. The general policy
of EPA and many states, is to prohibit acute toxicity in the mixing
zone. In all cases, the state water quality standards allow for a
percentage of the stream flow or width for a zone of passage. This
study did not include an evaluation of potential toxic effects within
-------
-11-
mixing zones. Doing so would have increased the number of facilities
listed, since the degree of dilution would be lower for the mixing zone
than the entire stream flow.
In the majority of cases, only very limited chemical analyses were
performed on the samples, therefore, determination of toxic agents was
problematic. In many cases, it appears that TRC and ammonia were
significant pollutants. Ammonia was prevalent at toxic levels in
numerous municipal and industrial discharges.
Overall, there are concerns regarding the potential impacts of dis-
chargers on waters in the Region. In these situations, more definitive
effluent testing, toxicity testing of receiving waters, and biological
surveys may be appropriate to elucidate and resolve water quality
concerns. These water bodies should also be evaluated to determine the
need for listing under Section 304(1).
CONCLUSIONS
The purpose of this study was to compile and evaluate whole effluent
toxicity data generated by the EPA Region 6 Laboratory during FY 1984-
88. A LOTUS l-2-3R spreadsheet was developed to present toxicity data,
as well as pertinent information on the facilities, effluent chemical
characteristics, and receiving water. The database contains results for
520 tests. The testing procedures included the 24-48 h daphnid acute,
8 d fathead minnow chronic, and 96 h algal (Selenastrum capricornutumj
chronic methods for freshwater effluents, and 8 d sheepshead minnow
chronic test for saltwater situations. When all three freshwater tests
were conducted side by side on a variety of effluents, the algal test
was most sensitive (52% of the time), followed by Daphnia and fathead
minnow tests (most sensitive 16% and 6% of the time, respectively).
However, because these tests have different durations and endpoints,
caution should be used in gauging sensitivity. The findings support
EPA's recommendations concerning the importance of multiple species
testing to address differences in species sensitivity.
Effluent toxicity results for several industrial categorties and
municipal sewage treatment plants were evaluated and compared. For the
industrial categories evaluated, the daphnid test was most sensitive to
Industrial Organic Chemical facilities (SIC Code=2869) and Federal
Facilities (9711), followed by the Plating and Polishing category
(3471). The Plastics Materials and Resins (2821) and Petroleum Refining
(2911) effluents affected Daphnia less than other industrial categories
investigated. Federal Facilities and Plating and Polishing facilities
had the greatest effect in the fathead minnow test, with all effuents
showing significant toxicity in 100% effluent. These were followed by
petroleum refining (with about 65% of effluents significantly toxic),
Plastics Materials and Resins (50% toxic) and Industrial Organic
Chemicals (about 45% toxic). Overall, the industrial categories
evaluated demonstrated acute toxicity to Daphnia in about 30%-55% of the
cases, while chronic toxicity to fathead minnow was exhibited in 45%-
100% of the cases, depending on the category examined.
-------
-12-
Municipal effluents were generally more toxic than the industrial
categories investigated, which was probably most influenced by total
residual chlorine, although toxicity also resulted from other toxic
agents. Overall, significant toxic effects were demonstrated in
Daphnia. fathead minnow and algal tests in 69%, 74% and 92%, respective-
ly, of the municipal effuents evaluated.
Finally, an assessment of the potential for receiving water toxic
effects was conducted, which incorporated the degree of effluent
toxicity and instream dilution. A total of 109 dischargers in EPA
Region 6 were found to have the potential for causing receiving water
effects. In these situations, more definitive effluent testing,
toxicity testing of receiving waters, and biological surveys may be
appropriate to elucidate and resolve water quality concerns. These
water bodies should also be evaluated to determine the need for listing
under Section 304(1).
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. To the extent possible, the algal (Selenastrum capricornuturn) chronic
test should be integrated with other standard short-term chronic tests,
as in most situations the aquatic plant community warrants protection.
Applications could include effluent testing under the NPDES program, and
in special water quality studies to define the effects of effuent
discharges.
2. Continued effluent screening should be conducted to further expand
the present database. The testing conducted to date has provided
insight into the occurrence and magnitude of effluent toxicity in the
Region. Based on the differences in species sensitivity, the multiple
species testing approach should be maintained. The Regional effluent
testing program should be reevaluated with regard to emphasis, direction
and methodology, on an annual basis. If possible, the direction should
be shifted to include site-specific testing of effluents and receiving
waters which need consideration under CWA Section 304(1). Also, while
it is understood that resources at the Regional Lab are limited, an
effort should be made to incorporate Regional Permitting Policy sampling
and testing procedures, if resources allow.
3. To the extent possible, the Regional Laboratory should further
develop its marine chronic testing capability, which would allow for
multiple species testing of effluents which dicharge to marine and
estuarine environments.
4. The states should evaluate the testing results contained herein.
They should use their discretion in further investigating discharges
which could result in instream toxicity. Such investigations could
include receiving water and effluent toxicity testing, chemical analyses
and biosurveys.
-------
-13-
5. The Permits Branch should utilize the data contained in this report
(Appendix A) when establishing requirements for reissued permits. The
data could be useful with regard to establishing monitoring frequency;
to evaluate the need for whole effluent toxicity testing and permit
limitations; to supplement self monitoring data; and to target and
prioritize facilites for special emphasis.
6. Based on the likelihood of instream toxicity resulting from total
residual chlorine and ammonia present in both industrial and municipal
discharges, the states should develop numeric water quality standards
for these parameters as a measure to better protect aquatic life related
beneficial uses.
-------
-14-
LITERATURE CITED
APHA. 1980. Standard Methods for the Evaluation of Water and Was-
tewater (15th Edition) . American Public Health Association, Washington,
D.C.
U.S. EPA. 1985a. Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents
to Freshwater and Marine Organisms. Edited by Peltier, W.H. and C.I.
Weber. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, Office of Research and Develop-
ment. EPA/600/4-85/013.
U.S. EPA. 1978. NEIC Policies and Procedures. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, National Enforcement Investigation Center, Denver,
CO. EPA/330/9-78-001-R (Revised 1983).
U.S. EPA. 1985b. Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic
Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms.
Edited by Horning, W.B. and C.I. Weber, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH,
Office of Research and Development. EPA/600/4-85/014.
U.S. EPA. 1985c. Technical Support Document for Water Quality-Based
Toxics Control. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water,
Washington, D.C. EPA/440/4-85-032.
U.S. EPA. 1985d. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chlorine-1984.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and
Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. 1985e. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia-1984. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and
Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity
of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Marine and Estuarine Organisms.
Edited by Weber, C.I. et a!. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, Office
of Research and Development. EPA/600/4-87/028.
W.E. Gates & Associates, Inc. 1982. Estimation of Stream Flow for the
Reach File (Draft). June 1982.
-------
-15-
FIGURES
-------
SIDE BY SIDE TESTING
RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF DAPHNID,
MINNOW AND ALGA TOXICITY TESTS
Alga Test
Most Sensitive
52%
Daphnid Test
Most Sensitive
16%
Minnow Test
Most Sensitive
6%
CTl
I
Fig. 1
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daphnia pulex. 8 d Fathead Minnow,
and/or 96 h Algal (Selenastrum capricornutuitO Toxicity Tests
Conducted Concurrently for 38 Effluents.
Alga Response Similar
to Daphnid and/or
Minnow
26%
-------
SIDE BY SIDE TESTING
RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF DAPHNID AND
MINNOW TOXICITY TESTS
Daphnid Response
Similar to Minnow
26%
Daphnid Test
Most Sensitive
42%
Fig. 2
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daphnia pulex and 8 d Fathead Minnow
Toxicity Tests Conducted Concurrently for 96 Effluents.
Minnow Test
More Sensitive
32%
-------
-18-
o
X
o
o
z
o
I
z
LJ
Z
UJ
u
o:
60
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
10 -
INDUSTRIAL AND FEDERAL FACILITIES
ACUTE EFFECTS TO DAPHNIA PULEX
N = 26
N=15
N=13
N=12
= 26
2821
LOW
2869
MEDIUM
2911
SIC CODE
3471
HIGH TOXICITY
9711
Fig. 3.
Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities to Daphnia
pulex. Standard Industrial Classification Codes Investigated
include: 2821 (Plastics Materials and Resins); 2869 (Industrial
Organic Chemicals); 2911 (Petroleum Refining); 3471 (Plating and
Polishing); and 9711 (Federal Facilities).
-------
-19-
o
x
o
I-
o
z
§
o
I
I-
z
LJ
D
L.
L.
O
Z
LJ
O
tt
LJ
D.
INDUSTRIAL AND FEDERAL FACILITIES
CHRONIC EFFECTS TO FATHEAD MINNOW
110
N=8
N=8
N=12
N=10
2869
!\] MEDIUM
2911
SIC CODE
3471
HIGH TOXICITY
971 1
Fig 4.
Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities to the
Fathead Minnow. Standard Industrial Classification Codes
Investigated include: 2821 (Plastics Materials and Resins); 2869
(Industrial Organic Chemicals); 2911 (Petroleum Refining); 3471
(Plating and Polishing); and 9711 (Federal Facilities).
-------
-20-
o
X
O
o
z
o
z
u
100
90 H
MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
EFFECTS TO DAPHNIA, MINNOW AND ALGA
DAPHNIA
LOW
N=27
MINNOW
TYPE OF TEST
ALGA
MEDIUM
HIGH TOXICITY
Fig. 5.
Relative Toxicity of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants to Daphnia
pulex. Fathead Minnow and Alga (Selenastrum capricornutum).
-------
-21-
z
UJ
D
u_
u.
LJ
Z
LJ
U
tt
UJ
0.
60
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
10
0
MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
TOXIC EFFECTS NOT DUE TO CHLORINE
N=8 OF 15
N=14 OF 27
N=8 OF 82
DAPHNIA
[7~71 CL2 NOT DETECTED
T"
MINNOW
TYPE OF TEST
ALGA
TOXIC AFTER DECL2
Fig. 6.
Percentage of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Effluents Tested
With Daphnia pulex. Fathead Minnow and Alga (Selenastrum
capricornutum) Where Chlorine was not Detected, or Which Were Toxic
After Samples were Dechlorinated.
-------
-22-
TABLES
-------
-23-
Table 1.
List of Water Bodies in Region 6 Which Have the Potential for
Instream Toxicity.
NPOES NUMBER
ARKANSAS
AR 0000523
AR 0000582
AR 0000680
AR 0001210
AR 0001236
AR 0003018
AR 0020338
AR 0021733
AR 0021750
AR 0021792
AR 0022624
AR 0033375
AR 0033766
AR 0034321
AR 0034380
AR 0035645
LOUISIANA
LA 0000493
LA 0002917
LA 0003824
LA 0004057
LA 0004090
LA 0005941
LA 0006131
LA 0008036
LA 0020044
LA 0020087
LA 0032417
LA 0034568
U 0036366
LA 0038091
LA 0041751
LA 0046477
LA 0056502
NEW MEXICO
NM 0020737
NM 0028827
001
010
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
003
001
004
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
ALCOA
GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL
GEORGIA PACIFIC
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
TYSON FOODS
USAF-BLYTHEVILLE AFB
DEQUEEN
FORT SMITH-MASSARD CRK
BERRYVILLE
HOWMET (ALUMAX)
STERLING FAUCET
PARAGOULD
HARRISON
STUTTGART
GLENWOOO
REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
S.U. ELECTRIC POWER
FIRESTONE
GRANT CHEMICAL
ETHYL CORP.
CITCO CITIES SERVICE
TECHN I GRAPHICS
CLECO
PLAIN DEALING
OBERL1N
ATLAS PROCESSING
BERN ICE
LAKE CHARLES PLT C
NEW ORLEANS-E. BANK
EUNICE
JONESBORO
MANY
GRANTS
LAS VEGAS
RECEIVING WATER
LAKE CATHERINE
HURRICANE CREEK
GUM CREEK
COFFEE CRK TO OUACHITA R.
BIG CRK TO FRANCOIS CRK
LITTLE R., ROLLING FK.
PEMISCOT BAYOU
BEAR CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
OSAGE CREEK
BIG CREEK
TOWN BRANCH/HURRICANE CRK
EIGHTMILE CREEK
CROOKED CREEK
KINGS BAYOU
CADDO RIVER
TR1B. TO CALCASIEU RIVER
CADDO LAKE
BAYOU d'INDE
DITCH TO BATON ROUGE BAYOU
MONTE SANO BAYOU
CALCASIEU RIVER
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL
LAKE RODEMACHER
CYPRESS BAYOY
BLUE BAYOU
BRUSHY BAYOU
BAYOU D'ARBONNE
CALCASIEU RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BAYOU MALLET
DUGDEMONA CREEK
BAYOU LA NANA
RIO SAN JOSE
GALLINAS RIVER
POSSIBLE
TOXIC AGENTS
AMMONIA/VANADIUM
METALS 7
7
7
AMMONIA
CHLORINE
?
7
CHLORINE
7
pH
METALS
AMMONIA
CHLORINE
AMMONIA
CHLORINE
UNKNOWN
AMMONIA
?
AMMONIA
7
AMMONIA
7
?
7
?
7
7
7
AND OTHER(S)
ORGAN I CS
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
7
AMMONIA
7
CHLORINE
?
AMMONIA/CHLORINE/OTHER(S)
-------
TABLE 1, Continued...
-24-
NPDES NUMBER
OKLAHOMA
OK 0000191
OK 0000256
OK 0000531
OK 0000795
OK 0000744
OK 0000809
OK 0001261
OK 0001295
OK 0022616
OK 0026701
OK 0026221
OK 0026841
OK 0026859
OK 0027931
OK 0030295
OK 0030333
OK 0034568
OK 0035246
OK 0036978
TEXAS
TX 0000132
TX 0000353
TX 0000892
TX 0003697
TX 0003875
TX 0005096
TX 0006025
TX 0006025
TX 0006068
TX 0006084
TX 0006327
TX 0007048
TX 0007439
TX 0007889
TX 0008907
T* 0009075
TX 0009148
TX 0009181
TX 0022527
TX 0022608
TX 0022811
TX 0023001
TX 0023418
TX 0023931
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
101
001
101
001
001
202
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
SEQUOYAH FUEL
CONOCO
ALLIED MATERIALS
TYSON FOODS
UEYERHAUSER
USAF-T INKER AFB
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES
TOTAL PETROLEUM
CUYMON- SWIFT PLANT
CUSHING-SOUTH STP
TULSA NORTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY NORTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY SOUTHSIDE
MOORE
USA- FORT SILL
BARTLESVILLE
OK ORDINANCE WORKS AUTH.
LAWTON
OKLA. CITY-N. CANADIAN
USA-RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT
GENERAL DYNAMICS
BELL HELICOPTER
MARATHON OIL CO.
MONSANTO
kOPPERS CO.
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
ARCO POLYMERS
ROHM & HAAS
DUPONT-SA8INE RIVER WORKS
LUBRIZOL CORP.
SDS BIOTECH CORP.
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
DUPONT
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
SID RICHARDSON CARBON
TERRELL
USAF-LAUGHLIN AFB
TRA-TEN MILE CREEK
VERNON
KINGSVILLE
NTMWD-RICHARDSON
RECEIVING WATER
ILLINOIS RIVER
OMAHA CREEK
SALT CREEK
LITTLE RIVER
GARLAND CREEK
SOLDIER CREEK
SPRING RIVER
SAND CREEK
BEAVER RIVER
COTTONWOOD CREEK
BIRD CREEK
CRUTCHO CREEK
CRUTCHO CREEK
LITTLE RIVER
E. CACHE CREEK
CANEY RIVER
CHATEAU CREEK
E. CACHE CREEK
N. CANADIAN RIVER
E. FORK ELLIOTT CREEK
LAKE WORTH
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R.
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL
CHOCOLATE BAYOU
BUFFALO BAYOU
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
TRIB. TO HOUSTON SC
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
SABINE RIVER
PATRICK BAYOU TO HSC
GREENS BAYOU TO HSC
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
?
E. DIXON CREEK
TRIB. TO CANADIAN R.
KINGS CREEK
TRIB. TO SACATOSA CREEK
TRIB. TO TEN MILE CREEK
PEASE RIVER
TRANQUITOS CREEK
DUCK CREEK
POSSIBLE TOXIC AGENTS
?
?
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
AMMONIA
AMMONIA
CHLORINE/METALS
CHLORINE
AMMONIA/OTHERS(S)
?
?
?
CHLORINE/OTHER(S)
?
CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE
?
CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE
METALS ?
COPPER/ZINC
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
7
?
METALS ?
METALS ?
SALINITY
?
AMMONIA
?
SALINITY
CHLORINE
?
AMMONIA/CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
?
PH
CHLORINE
AMMONIA
AMMONIA/CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE
CHLORINE
-------
TABLE 1, Continued...
-25-
NPOES NUMBER
FACILITY NAME
RECEIVING WATER
POSSIBLE TOXIC AGENTS
TX 0024228 001 STEPHENVILLE
TX 0024309 001 LUFKIN
TX 0024368 001 JASPER
TX 0024678 001 GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
TX 0024686 001 GARLAND-ROWLETT CREEK
TX 0025429 001 USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
TX 0026263 001 SPENCER ROAD MUD
TX 0026751 001 EL PASO-HASKELL
TX 0027537 001 WAXAHACHIE
TX 0046884 001 HOUSTON-NORTHSIDE
TX 0046957 001 AUSTIN-GOVALLE
TX 0046990 001 BEAUMONT
TX 0047058 001 CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
TX 0047074 001 CORPUS CHRISTI-WEST SIDE
TX 0047104 001 C. CHRISTI-LACUNA MADRE
TX 0047295 001 FORT WORTH-VILLAGE CREEK
TX 0047309 001 GALVESTON-MAIN
TX 0047431 001 NTMWD-MESOUITE
TX 0047651 001 TEMPLE
TX 0047830 001 DALLAS-CENTRAL
TX 0047848 001 DALLAS-SOUTHS1DE
TX 0052761 001 SHELL DEVELOPMENT CO.
TX 0052892 001 LEWISVILLE
TX 0053023 001 CHAMPION PAPER CO.
TX 0055611 001 GREENVILLE
TX 0056111 001 USAF-LACKLAND AFB
TX 0056731 001 CORSICANA-PLANT #2
TX 0072982 001 HOLLY FARMS
TX 0084409 002 DENKA CHEMICAL
TX 0085570 001 FORMOSA PLASTICS
TX 0089125 001 EXXON CHEMICAL
N. BOSQUE RIVER
HURRICANE CREEK
SANDY CREEK
DUCK CREEK
ROWLETT CREEK
PLUM C. TO WICHITA R.
HORSEPEN CREEK TO HSC
RIO GRANDE
N. PRONG CREEK
BUFFALO BAYOU
COLORADO RIVER
HILDEBRANDT BAYOU
OSO BAY
LA VOLLO CRK TO OSO CRK
LACUNA MADRE
W. FORK TRINITY RIVER
GALVESTON BAY
MESQUITE CREEK
LITTLE ELM CREEK
TRINITY RIVER
TRINITY RIVER
D. TO N. FORK BRAYS B.
ELM FK. TRINITY RIVER
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
COULEECH CREEK
TRIB. TO MEDIO CREEK
RICHLAND CREEK
PRAIRIE CRK TO TENAHA CRK
SIMS BAYOU TO HSC
TRIB. TO COX CREEK
CEDAR BAYOU
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE/ORGAN ICS
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE ?
CHLORINE
?
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE
METALS ?
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE
?
CHLORINE ?
CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE/OTHER(S)
?
AMMONIA
CHLORINE/OTHER(S)
-------
-26-
APPENDICES
-------
-27-
APPENDIX A
U.S. EPA REGION VI EFFLUENT TOXICITY DATA
A description of the data, information, and evaluations
included in the spreadsheet are presented below.
jt - Numerical Order of Data.
NPDES # - Generally accepted NPDES number, taken from PCS or
permit.
Facility Name - Most current facility name, taken from PCS or
permit.
SIC Code - Standard Industrial Classification Code, taken from PCS.
Location - City where facility is located.
Receiving Water Name - Generally accepted receiving water name,
taken from the NPDES permit file.
Stream Flows (Mean and 7Q10) - Stream flow values (in CFS), were
obtained from the Permits Branch and consist of data from published
low flow values, USGS data, or from the STORET Gage File. For
states using 7Q2 as the critical low flow, 7Q2 values are presented
in place of 7Q10's, if data was available. Some stream flow values
from facilities which do not yet have "third round" permits should
be considered tentative.
Pipe Flow (Mean and Maximum) - Discharge flow values (in MGD) were
primarily taken from PCS. In some cases flow data were also taken
from discharge monitoring reports (DMR's). Mean flows were
calculated using 10-15 monthly average values; maxima are maximum
recorded values for the same period of record.
IWC - Instream Waste Concentration, estimated as the percent
effluent dilution in the receiving water after mixing, calculated
using the following equation:
Qe x 100
IWC(%) = Qe + Qs,
where Qe and Qs are average pipe flow and critical (7Q10) stream
flows, respectively, in CFS units. Because the stream flow values
are considered tentative, the IWC should also be considered as
such.
Sample Collection Date - Date when the facility was sampled.
Effluent Physical/Chemical Characteristics - Parameters measured
included salinity (o/oo); specific conductance (uMHO/cm); hardness
and alkalinity (mg/1 as CaCO3) , pH, total residual chlorine (mg/1);
and unionized ammonia. These measurements were taken at test
initiation, and in some cases during tests. Minimum DO (mg/1 or
-------
-28-
% saturation) experienced during the course of the of the test is
also presented to determine whether low DO could have contributed
to mortality, if it occurred.
Test Species - The test organisms included daphnids Daphnia pulex
and Ceriodaphnia dubia; fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas; green
alga, Selenastrum capricornutum; opposum shrimp, Mvsidopsis bahia
or M. almyra; sheepshead minnow, Cvprinodon variegatus; sea urchin,
Arbacia puntulata; and red macroalga, Champia parvula. The most
data are available for D. pulex (acute test), although a
considerable amount of chronic data were collected during FY 1986-
88 for fathead minnow, sheepshead minnow and alga. One special
study (U.S. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi), includes data for
sea urchin and red alga and in, one case, a MICROTOX test was
conducted.
Test Length - Duration of test in days, as follows:
1-3 d (24-96 h) Acute Tests
4-9 d (96-216 h) Chronic Tests
LC50 - Calculated LC50 or EC50 is presentd in percent effluent
where mortality is > 50% in 100% effluent. The Trimmed Spearman-
Karber procedure was used prior to April, 1987, and the Probit
procedure was used thereafter. Where calculations have been made,
24 h, 48 h, and chronic LCSO's or ECSO's are presented.
Mortality in 100% Effluent - Mortality (%) in undiluted effluent.
If effluents had detectable chlorine, results for 100%
dechlorinated effluent were also included.
NOEC/LOEC - Lowest observed and no observed effect concentrations
for chronic tests. Effects include mortality , combined with
teratogenicity, in fish tests, and mortality and reproduction in
Ceriodaphnia tests. Significance was evaluated using Dunnett's
Test and ANOVA at P=0.95.
Comments - Included here are: the 95% confidence interval (CI, in
percent effluent) around the LC50/EC50, the chronic value (ChV, in
percent effluent, and pertinent notes regarding effluent chemical
characteristics and toxicity. In many cases the CI's were not
calculable, thus, are not provided. The ChV was calculated as the
geometric mean of the LOEC and NOEC, and is equivalent to the
maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC).
Potential for Instream Effects - The potential for receiving water
toxic effects was assessed primarily with the following criteria
from EPA's Technical Support Document (U.S. EPA 1985c) and state
water quality standards implementation procedures or policy:
-Potential for instream acute effects if IWC>LC1,
where LC1=0.3 x LC50;
-Potential for instream chronic effects if IWC^NOEC;
-------
-29-
-For Texas estuaries, the IWC=8% effluent;
-For Texas Lakes, the IWC is 16% effluent;
-Houston Ship Channel Dischargers have an assumed IWC of
30% effluent, at which acute effects are evaluated;
-The state of Louisiana has requested that a low flow of
111,000 be used for the Mississippi River; and
-Some best professional judgement was used in assessing
potential effects in "no flow" situations (e.g., lakes),
or where stream or pipe flow data, and specific
implementation procedures were not available.
It should be realized that prediction of instream toxic effects is
contingent on whole effluent toxicity behaving conservatively in
the receiving water. This evaluation also assumes zero upstream
toxicity. In fact, these assumptions may not be valid in every
case.
-------
1
NPOES 1
1 AR 0000043
2AR 0000523
3 AR 0000523
4 AR 0000523
5 AR 0000523
6 flR 0000523
7 AR 0000531
8 AR 0000582
9 AR 0000562
10 AR 0000562
11 AR 0000591
12 AR 0000591
13 AR 0000647
14 AR 0000663
15 AR 0000660
!
I HLIUI T/K-tcmmi MMIEH iwuivniiuH __________
OUT-
CM i
FALL
FACILITY NAME
001 OARLINB STORE FIXTURES
001 STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
002 STRATEGIC MIICRAL CORP.
002 STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
001 STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
001 STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
002 REYNOLDS METALS
009 ALCOA
009 ALCOA
010 ALCOA
001 CROSS OIL
001 CROSS OIL
001 TOSCO CORP. REFINERY
002 BERRY PETROLEUM
GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL
DIP
Bib
CODE
3471
1094
1094
1094
1094
1094
3334
3334
3334
3334
2911
2911
2911
2911
2879
i nrATtny
LULmlQN
(CITY)
PARAGOULD
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
ARKAKLPHIA
BAUXITE
BAUXITE
BAUXITE
SMACKOVER
SMACKOVER
a DORADO
STEPHENS
a DORADO
STREAM F
(CFS)
LOU
(TENTATIVE)
RECEIVING HATER NAME
EI6HTNILE CREEK
LAKE CATHERINE
LAKE CATHERINE
LAKE CATHERINE
LAKE CATHERINE
LAKE CATHERINE
OUACHITA RIVER
HURRICANE CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
SMACKOVER CREEK
SNACKOVER CREEK
BAYOU DELOUTRE
TRIB. TO SMACKOVER CRX
GUM CREEK
MEAN
133.88
2401
116
116
116
365
365
89
247
7010
0.12
120
120
120
120
120
95
0
0
0
0.353
0.353
1.8
0.353
PIPE FLOM
(M6D)
MEAN MAX.
0.12 0.23
0.29 1.69
0.42 8.65
0.42 8.65
0.29 1.69
0.29 1.69
1.17 1.66
4.64 12.43
4.64 12.43
2.49 4.75
0.1 0.23
0.1 0.23
2.03 2.79
0.04 0.1
0.4 0.67
TUT
1HL
61.21
0.37
0.63
0.83
0.37
0.37
1.87
60.78
60.76
100
19.69
19.69
63.64
9
SAMPLE
DATE
06-J*n-86
07-May-85
25-Feb-86
25-Feb-66
25-Feb-B6
25-Feb-fl6
24-Mar-86
21-Jan-B5
21-Jtn-85
21-ftov-85
29-Jol-86
29-Jul-66
12-«ar-B4
12-Mar-e5
23-Sep-86
"
SAL-
INTTV
INI IT
(0/00)
0
78
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
0
crrujcni miaiu«./uKmiM.
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TQUTT
IHTILt
(UHHO/CM)
2100
49000
800
800
1200
1200
140
700
700
850
1700
1700
3000
2350
650
UMKHUItHlBI ILS
TOTAL
RESID. UNION-
HARDNESS
fHR/l OK
InU/L Ho
C-C03)
92
204
204
373
373
29
92
92
509
102
102
70
130
39
ALKALINITY
fMG/| OC -u
1HU/U no
CiC03)
162
17
17
42
42
29
19
19
4
54
54
101
136
8
1"
o
-------
i
I
I
1
: NPDESI
! 16 AR 0000680
1 17 AR 0000752
IB AR 0001210
19 AR 0001236
20 AR 0001236
21 AR 0001236
22 AR 0001236
23 AR 0001449
24 AR 0001449
25 AR 0001449
26 AR 0001449
t 27 AR 0001678
I 28 AR 0001678
I 29 AR 0001678
! 30 AR 0001678
!
I HL1L1 1 11 IttltlYIHJ NMICH llWUIgWI IIH
OUT-
cot i
rfCL
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
002
002
002
FACILITY NAME
GREAT LAKES OCNlCflL
a DORADO CHEMICAL CO.
GEORGIA PACIFIC
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
AT 1 T TELETYPE
ATI TTELETYPE
ATITTELETYPE
AT IT TELETYPE
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
fiir
Dlb
CODE
2879
2873
2621
2821
2821
2821
2821
3661
3661
3661
3661
2892
2892
2892
2892
i nrartflM
LUWilUV
(CITY)
a DORADO
a DORADO
CKUbStll
NALVERN
NALVERN
MALVERN
NALVERN
LITTLE ROCK
LITTLE ROCK
LITTLE ROCK
LITTLE ROCK
PINE BLUFF
PINE BLUFF
PINE BLUFF
PINE BLUFF
STREAM FUM
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (M6D)
RECEIVING UATER NAME MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
SUN CREEK 0.4 0.87
TRIB. TO FLAT CREEK 58 1.14 1.18 3.45
COFFEE CRK TO OUACHITA 6113 10844.89 88.1
BIO C. TO FRANCOIS C. 142.3 1.35 0.31 0.41
BIG C. TO FRANCOIS C. 142.3 1.35 0.31 0.41
BIO C. TO FRANCOIS C. 142.3 1.35 0.31 0.41
BIG C. TO FRANCOIS C. 142.3 1.35 0.31 0.41
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.15
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.15
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.15
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.15
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
tup
IHL
(*)
38.38
39.19
£6.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
3.41
3.41
3.41
3.41
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
-
SAMPLE
m t rrTTflu
LULLcUllUn
DATE
23-SBP-86
16-Apr-85
16-Jul-85
29-Ort-66
29-Oct-«6
16-Nar-8B
l6-Har-8B
29-Jul-86
20-Nay-87
20-May-87
20-Nay-87
13-Nov-84
22-Apr-86
19-Oct-87
19-Oct-87
SAL-
tUlTV
in i IT
(0/00)
0
0
0
3
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UTLUmi »71I31U«./UKniLN. UWKH.ItKI!>llU>
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TQUTC
IrflVUL
(UMHO/cm
650
995
2300
2300
2300
2800
2800
950
500
500
500
500
1325
850
850
HARDNESS
f HP /I AQ
tnb/L Ha
CaC03)
39
92
256
8
8
20
20
40
22
22
22
118
528
ALKALINITY
/HC/I fM -1*
Inb/L Ha
CaC03)
8
27
180
853
853
835
835
18
7
7
7
17
35
("
(SU)
6.4
7.3
7.7
8.9
8.9
8.1
8.1
7.8
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.2
8.3
8.7
8.7
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
TUC
Inc
(NB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
4.7
)4.7
6.6
6.6
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
0.8
0.8
i
MINI- :
MUM t
oo :
NB/L) !
no < i
On % I
SAT.) !
91* :
8.4 :
9 :
69* :
8 :
72* :
81* t
8.3 :
95* !
1
B :
8.6 !
8.2 t
91* t
a :
!
OUT-
tot i
rtu.
1 WOES I 1 FACILITY NAME
16 AR 0000680 GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL
17 AR 0000752 001 a DORADO CHEMICAL CO.
18 AR 0001210 001 BEOR61A PACIFIC
19 AR 0001236 001 BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
20 AR 0001236 001 BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
21 AR 0001236 001 BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
22 AR 0001236 001 BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
23 AR 0001449 001 A T 1 T TELETYPE
24 AR 0001449 001 A T 1 T TELETYPE
25 AR 0001449 001 ATM TELETYPE
26 AR 0001449 001 A T 1 T TELETYPE
27 AR 0001678 002 USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
28 AR 0001678 002 USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
29 AR 0001678 002 USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
30 AR 0001678 002 USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
tFFLUtNl TQIICIir
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
P. PRONELAS 7 73 100 75 SO
D. PULE* 1 5 0
D. PULEX 2 45 30
P. PRONELAS 8 28 100 1 (1
D. PULEX 1 70 100
P. PRONELAS 8 8 100 12 6
D. PULEX 2 27 100
D. PULEX 1 0
P. PRONELAS 8 0
SELENASTRUN 8 11
D. PULEX 2 0
D. PULEX 1 0 0
D. PULEX 2 24 1 95
P. PRONELAS 8 46 100 50 25
D. PULEX 2 36 65
1 CDVENTS
NOTE: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
CMttHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
CI:64-B4; ChV=61<
-
ChV(l| VERY HIGH l«0| (CRT. IN Pa 6 DILUTIONS
NOTE EITROCLY HIGH NH3| ABBREVIATED TEST
ChV*8.5*| NOTE HIGH NH3 AND COD
CI:22-34; VERY HIGH NH3 AND COD
-
-
NO 516. EFFECT
-
-
CIl 7-81 (24H)
ChV=35*
CI 122-66
POTENTIAL
FOR
TMGTDTttl
InOlnCW
U-hkUIS
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
I
co
-------
._.- -^nril ITV/DTTFTUTUR UQTFD THFOPMrtTtriM -------
OUT-
PM I
1 NPDESI
31 OR 0003016
EAR 0003018
33 RD 0020338
34 AR 0020702
35 AR 0020702
36 RR 0021811
37 OR 0021733
38 AR 0021730
39 RR 00217SO
40 RR 0021792
41 RR 0021806
42 OR 0022624
43 RR 0033278
44 RR 0033278
43 RR 0033278
! .
riu.
FACILITY NAME
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
USAF-BLYTHEVILLE RFB
BATESVILLE
BRTESV1U£
MOUNTAIN HONE
DEQUEEN
FORT SNITH-NASSARD CRK
FORT SMTIHIRSSRRD CRK
BERRYVILLE
LITTLE ROCK-ADAMS FIELD
HOWCT (A.K.A. AUJHAX)
FORTSHITH-P STREET
FORT SMITH-P STREET
FORT SMITH-P STREET
CtP
Dltt
CODE
2016
2016
9711
4932
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
3354
4952
4952
4952
i nroTinu
LULHI 1UH
(CITY)
BRANNIS
6RANNIS
H.YDCVILLE
BATESVILLE
BATESVILLE
MOUNTAIN HONE
DEOUEEN
FORT SMITH
FORT SMITH
BERRYVILLE
LITTLE RXX
NR6MLIA
FORT SMITH
FORT SMITH
FORT SMITH
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOU
(TENTATIVE) (HBD)
RECEIVIN3 UATER NAME
LITTLE R., ROLLINS FK.
LITTLE R., ROLLINS FK.
PEHISCOT BAYOU
WHITE RIVER
WHITE RIVER
HICKS CREEK
BEAR CREEK
RRKANBAS RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
OSA6E CREEK
RRKANSAS RIVER
BIS CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
MEAN
122.55
122.55
6.03
11909
11909
43.16
114
30206
30206
204
40961
115.3
29628
29628
29628
7010 MEAN MAI.
0.12 0.2 0.38
0.12 0.2 0.38
0 0.3 1.1
8% 2.81 5.38
896 2.81 5.38
14 1.4 197
0.12 1.43 8.77
722 6.7 17.1
722 6.7 17.1
0 1.4 2.62
1355 27.88 74.46
0.1 0.16 0.41
709 8.3 17.1
709 8.3 17.1
709 8.3 17.1
TUT
INw
(*>
60.78
60.78
100
0.48
0.48
10.86
94.87
1.42
1.42
100
3.09
71.43
1.78
1.78
1.78
I
SAMPLE
Ti i rrrtnu
L4JLL-CUI lln
DRTE
22-Ffb-e8
aa-feb-ea
17-Dec-84
29-Mar-88
29-Mar-88
30-»br-B8
OB-Nov-84
Oa-Jun-86
02-Jun-«6
ll-Sep-64
85-Jun-«4
05-Sep-S*
19-Fefr-86
19-feb-86
3HUy-8B
SAL-
TUTTV
Inl IT
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
«- tmiEvr Duvctra /nmTroi rwwwiTOTCTTPc _ . '
TOTAL
SPECIFIC RESID. UNION-
CONDUC-
TftMpC
IrvAJL
(UMHO/CN)
790
790
400
300
300
425
400
400
400
300
500
500
500
HARDNESS ALKALINITY
fMC/1 OG fMO/l DC -**
IflD/L HS> IHD/L Ho
CaCtB) CaC03>
60
128
128
194
44
60
60
38
12
63
65
66
90
106
106
151
76
48
48
29
307
184
164
109
f
(SU)
7.9
7.9
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.6
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.3
9.4
7.0
7.0
6.9
CHLOR-
TUC
INC
(MG/L)
i
S
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.8
1.4
1.4
(0.1
IZED
UU7
Fits
(H6/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
)3.6
>3.6
0.2
1
MINI- 1
HUH !
DO !
M6/L) !
m* 1
% t
SAT.) f
an i
9i* :
7.6 !
87X !
97* !
97* !
8.1 :
6.7 :
86* :
7.8 1
6.6 I
7.6 I
90* :
9tx :
97* !
1 NPDESI
31 AR 0003018
32 AR 0003018
33 AR 0020338
34 AR 0020702
35 RR 0020708
36 AR 0021211
37 RR 0021733
38 AR 0021750
39 RR 0021750
40 RR 0021792
41 RR 0021806
42 AR 0082624
43 RR 0033878
1 44 RR 0033278
! 45 RR 0033878
i
OUT-
Ctt 1
i
001
001
001
008
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
1
!
:
FACILITY NPJC
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
USAF-BLYTHEVILLE AFB
BATESVILLE
BATESVILLE
MOUNTAIN HOME
DEOUEEN
FORT SMITH-NRSSARD CRK
FORT SNITH-NA68ARD CRK
BERRYVILLE
LITTLE ROCK-ADAMS FIELD
HOUNET (A.K.R. RUHR!)
FORT SMITH-P STREET
FORT SMITH-P STREET
FORT SMITH-P STREET
TEST SPECIES
0. PULE*
P. PRONELAS
D. PULE*
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEI.
D. PULE*
D. PULE*
D. PULE*
C. AFFINIS
D. PULE*
D. PULE*
D. PULE*
P. PROMELAS
C. AFFINIS
P. PRONELAS
i
TEST
LENGTH
TM
U-UJJtHI
LC50
lUlltm
MORTALITY
tl *AA*
DAYS 84H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
2
7
2
8
2
2
2
2
7
2
8
3
7
7
8
18
16 9
8 8
5 4
1.9 1.6
17 14
11
100
56 100
100
93 60
20
10
100
100
16 100
too
100
100
100
8 100
76 70
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
TMOTPn
1WIUJ
EFaUENT
10
5
too
20
0
0
0
20
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOECNOEC
100 50
100 SO
23 10
10 5
10 3
100 SO
catBus
!
NOTE: CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC30 !
t
!
! POTENTIAL !
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
ClilS-22
ChV»71X
CI: 12-25 (24H)| 6-12 (48H>| CHLOR. | SOME IND.
ChV«7IX
NO SI6. HORT.
NO SIS. HORT.
CIt 6-12 (24 t 48H)
CI: 3-6 (24 1 48H)| NOTE NORT. IN DECHLOR.
ChV=l6*; DECHL. 50* EFFL. TESTED) 6RRPH. INTER.
CI: 1.7-2.1 (24H)| 1.5-1.8 (48H)
CI: 15-20 (24H); 13-15 (48H); DECHL. NOT TESTED
LC50 IS A 72H VALUE; NOTE HIGH pH
ChV-7«| 30* NORT. IN 10* EFFL.
ChV=7<) GRAPHICALLY INTERPOLATED
ChV»71>
FOR
ilklPT
1
arAM i
EFFECTS I
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
ACUTE !
CHRONIC !
ACUTE t
CHRONIC !
ACUTE !
ACUTE !
ACUTE i
ACUTE !
CHRONIC !
ACUTE i
ACUTE !
ACUTE I
CHRONIC !
CHRONIC !
CHRONIC !
i
I
oo
NJ
I
-------
r
NPDESI
46 AR 0033878
47 AR 0033373
48 AR 0033375
49 AR 0033373
50 AR 0033373
31 AR 0033373
32 AR 0033373
53 AR 0033375
54 AR 0033553
53 AR 0033766
56 AR 0033766
37 AR 0033766
SB AR 0034321
39 AR 0034321
60 AR 0034321
!
OUT-
m i
rfU.
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
FORT 8NITH-P STREET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
BTERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
BTERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
ROGERS
PARABOULD
PARABOULD
PARAGOULD
HARRISON
HARRISON
HARRISON
fiir
OIL
CODE
49SE
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
4932
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
i nroTTnu
LUUII1UI
(CITY)
FORT SMITH
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
ROGERS
PARABOULD
PARABOULD
PARABOULD
HARRISON
HARRISON
HARRISON
civira NHlcn irrunmi lun
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
RECEIVINB HATER NAME MEAN 7010
ARKANSAS RIVER 29628 709
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
OSAGE CREEK 152 12.43
EIGHTNILE CREEK 134 0. 1
EI6HTHILE CREEK 134 0. 1
EIGHTNILE CREEK 134 0.1
CROOKED CREEK 132. 12 44
CROOKED CREEK 132.12 44
CROOKED CREEK 132. 12 44
PIPE FLOW
(MBD)
l' L
MEAN MAX.
8.3 17.1
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
4.15
1.32 3.65
1.32 3.65
1.32 3.65
1.08 2.05
1.08 2.05
1.08 2.05
t If*
1W*
(*)
1.78
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
34.09
95.34
95.34
95.34
3.67
3.67
3.67
SAMPLE
"*n i ccTiffci
*UJ_tl.llui
DATE
31-M»y-B8
22-Jul-e5
22-Jul-85
21-flpr-86
21-Apr-86
Oe-Oct-66
08-Oct-66
25-Jul-87
ll-Sep-84
17-Sep-85
09-Sep-*7
09-Sep-B7
05-ttay-87
05-«ay-87
05-Nay-87
SAL-
TNT TV
Jnl IT
(0/00)
0
p
Z
0
0
2
2
8
0
0
0
2
2
2
-crruuc
SPECIFIC
OWDUC-
TflUTT
IHNLC
(UMHO/CM)
500
1750
1750
1700
1700
4000
4000
6000
650
600
600
600
850
850
850
Jii pmaiLH
HARDNESS
fHR/l OR
InO/L HO
CaC03)
66
432
422
560
560
410
410
114
39
107
107
107
i_/trcmu«.
ALKALINITY
/MC/I OQ
\nb/L Ha
CaOQ)
109
70
70
S3
S3
93
95
128
162
134
134
134
svm.
.41
P"
(SU)
6.9
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.7
7.7
7.4
7.1
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.3
7.3
7.3
ICHiailL
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
the
IFt
(NB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
<0. 1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
1.8
1.8
1.8
UNION-
IZED
hftfl
FtU
(H6/L)
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
i
MINI-
MUM
DO
HG/L)
M*
*
SAT.)
87*
9.4
9
7.6
82*
7
88*
81*
7.2
6.8
91*
7.6
8
93* !
!
I
U)
U)
|
t NPDESI
46 AR 0033278
47 AR 0033375
48 RR 0033375
49 AR 0033375
50 AR 0033375
31 AR 0033375
52 AR 0033375
53 AR 0033375
54 AR 0033553
33 AR 0033766
56 AR 0033766
57 AR 0033766
58 AR 0034321
59 AR 0034321
60 AR 0034321
OUT-
cn i
TILL
i
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
FORT SNITH-P STREET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
BTERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
ROGERS
PARABOULD
PARABOULD
PARAEOULD
HARRISON
HARRISON
HARRISON
EFFLUENT TUX1CITY
TEST SPECIES
D.
P.
D.
D.
P.
D.
P.
C.
D.
D.
P.
D.
PULEX
PROMELPB
PULEX
PULEX
PROMELAS
PULEX
PROMELAS
VARIEBATUS
PULEX
PULEX
PRONELAS
PULEX
GELENASTRUN
D.
P.
PULEX
PROMELAS
TEST
LENGTH
TU ...
DAYS 24H
8
8
i
1
7
1
8
9
1
1
8
2
4
1 (6
8
LCSO MORTALITY
Til IfVYY
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
83 75
56 100
20
10
45
5
83 60
54 100
0
0
45
0
(6 95
100
61 100
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
TMOTTTI
INHItU
EFFLUENT
0
0
81
0
100
. CVKNTS
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
50 25
50 10
73 50
100 50
100 SO
6 (6
50 25
NOTE! CI°95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChVCHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
Cl:64-100
Cl:49-63j CMMS*
EXTENTION OF TEST TO BD*0 SI6. MORTALITY
-
QiV-22*
-
CI«47-100( ChV=61*
ChV>71*; NOTE HIGH SALINITY
-
-
ChV-71*
-
OiV(6«| NOTE EFFECT IN DECHL. EFFL
100* HORT. IN 6-100* EFFL. AFTER 24H
ChV=35*| GRAPHICALLY ITERPOLflTEDj MORT. IN DECHL,
1
:
i
POTENTIAL !
FOR
TUCT
i
new* i
IHalFiuBi i
EFFECTS 1
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
ACUTE !
CHRONIC !
ACUTE i
ACUTE !
CHRONIC i
ACUTE !
CHRONIC >
CHRONIC t
ACUTE !
ACUTE !
CHRONIC .'
ACUTE !
CHRONIC !
ACUTE !
CHRONIC !
-------
i THUILI ir/nELCivjro MHICK iwruwwuun *
!
1
1
1 NPDEBI
61 AR 0034380
62 AR 0034380
63 AR 0034432
6* AR 0034432
65 AR 0034452
66 AR 0034891
67 AR 0035386
68 AR 0039643
69 AR 00356*3
70 AR 0039649
71 AR 0036*18
78 AR 0036352
73 AR 0036932
74 AR 0037770
75 AR 0037770
OUT-
FALL
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
002
001
001
002
one
FACILITY NAME
STUTTBART
STUTTBART
USA-FORT CHRFFEE
USA-FORT CHRFFEE
USA-FORT CHRFFEE
PIPER INDUSTRIES
ARKANSAS EASTMAN
6LENUDOD
GLENUOOD
BLENUOOO
VERTAC
BEKAERT STEa HIRE
BEKAERT BTEa HIRE
CPS CHEMICAL
CPS CHEMICAL
BIC
CODE
4932
4992
9711
9711
9711
3496
2869
4992
4992
4992
2819
3319
3319
2869
2869
LOCATION
(CITY)
STUTTGART
STUTTBART
FORT CHAFFEE
FORT CHAFFEE
FORT CHAFFEE
CLARENDON
BATEBVILLE
GLENUDOD
GLENUOOD
GLENUOOD
WEST HELENA
VRNBUREN
VANBUREN
HEST MEMPHIS
WEST MEMPHIS
STREAM ROW
(CFsi PIPE aou
(TENTATIVE) (MBD)
RECEIVING WATER NAME MEAN 7Q10 MEAN MAX.
KINGS BAYOU 297.22 0.72 .71 4.69
KINGS BAYOU 257.22 0.72 .71 4.69
LITTLE VACHE 6RRSSE CRK 178.5 20.37 .26 2.83
LITTLE VACHE 6RR8SE CRK 178.5 20.37 .26 2.83
LITTLE VACHE GRASSE CRK 178.5 20.37 .26 2.83
WHITE RIVER 30867 4889 0.013 0.025
WHITE RIVER 12600 905 1.2 1.9
CADDO RIVER 5 0 0.22 0.5
CADDO RIVER 5 0 0.22 0.5
CADDO RIVER 9 0 0.22 0.5
BEAR C. TO HISS. R. 484387 103334 0.04 0.07
ARKANSAS RIVER 30206 816.7 0.074 0.258
ARKANSAS RIVER 30206 816.7 0.074 0.292
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 470057 69646 0.037 0.067
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 470057 69646 0.037 0.067
IUC
«)
78.64
78.64
8.74
8.74
8.74
0.0004
0.21
100
100
100
0.0006
0.014
0.014
0.0001
0.0001
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
19-Ort-87
19-Oct-*7
27-AU9-85
31-M»y-88
31-May-fi8
29-Jul-66
20-Aug-86
21-Jul-87
ei-Jul-87
21-JuI-87
05-Nov-«5
22-Aug-84
21-Miy-B5
27-Mar-B4
18-Dec-B*
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
0
0
0
0
4
3
0
0
0
0
3
4
5
UTLUC
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(IMO/CM)
700
700
190
160
160
6000
4500
510
510
510
4000
2100
4500
6600
11000
Jii mi3ju«
HARDNESS
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
95
46
46
340
1112
72
72
72
90
828
11600
24
60
L'LTCmLM. 1
ALKALINITY
(H6/L AS
CaC03)
74
33
33
59
129
9
9
9
560
5
10
676
638
JMM.
Ptt
(SU)
7.7
7.7
7.8
6.2
6.2
9.0
7.4
6.6
6.6
6.6
8.7
7.0
7.2
7.0
7.1
itKlbill
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(HG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
0.4
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
0.4
0.4
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(HB/L)
0.2
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
0.7
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
MB/L)
OR t
SAT.)
7.7
87X
8.8
63X
93*
8
7.8
91X
7.7
8.6
8.1
8.4
7.1
6.4
-EFFLUENT TDXICITY
CHRONIC !
-COMMENTS-
OUT-
Cfll 1
rtu.
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
61 AR 0034380 001 STUTTBART
62 AR 0034380 001 STUTTBART
63 AR 0034492 001 USA-FORT CHAFFEE
64 AR 0034492 001 USA-FORT CHRFFEE
65 AR 0034492 001 USA-FORT QWFFEE
66 AR 0034891 001 PIPER INDUSTRIES
67 AR 0035386 002 ARKANSAS EASTMAN
68 AR 0035645 001 BLEKUOOD
69 AR 0035645 001 GLENHOOD
70 AR 0035645 001 GLENUOOD
71 AR 0036412 002 VERTAC
72 AR 0036952 001 BEKAERT STEEL HIRE
73 AR 0036992 001 BEKAERT STEa HIRE
74 AR 0037770 002 CPS CHEMICAL
75 AR 0037770 002 CPS OCHICAL
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEX 2 10
P. PROHEUS 8 17 100 12 (12
D. PULEI 1 0 0
P. PROHEUS 8 59 100 100 100 50
D. PULEX 2 55
D. PULEI 2 81 35 100
D. PULEX 1 10
SELENASTRUH 4 31 93 25 12
P. PROHELAS 8 46 100 5 50 25
D. PULEX 2 31 27 100 10
D. PULEX 2 37 3 100 100
D. PULEI 2 31 2* 100
D. PULEX 2 77 55 100 100
D. PULEX 2 10 100
D. PULEX 2 10 9 100 100
NOTE: CI-99* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC30
ChV-CHRDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO 516. (CRT.
CI: 12-21; ChV(12X
-
ChV»71X; NOTE SIS. MORT. IN DECHL. EFFL.
-
CI: 65-100 (2*H>i 27-46I48H); 20% MORT. IN 4 0/00
24H TEST
CI 125-35; ChV=17X
ChV=35X
-
CI: 23-58 (24H); 2-6(48H)
CI: 26-37I24H); £0-27(*8H)j CHEN. ON 90X EFFL.
CI: 48-64 (48H)
LC50UOX; NOTE HI6H SALINITY
CI: 6-12(2* I *&H); NOTE HIGH SALINITY
1
POTENTIAL t
FOR
TUCTWOH
irolKCMn
EFFECTS
ND ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
I
u>
-------
1
1
!
i
:
1 1 NPOESI
76 AR 0037770
i 77 AR 0037800
! 78 AR 0038512
1 79 AR 0041203
! 80 AR 0041211
! 81 AR 0041220
I
l MLiLl tr/KCLCivino NHICR inrunjwiiuH ' -
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY
NAME
SIC
CODE
002 CPS CHEMICAL 2869
009 ENSCO
001 VERTAC
009 REYNOLDS
001 REYNOLDS
007 REYNOLDS
METALS
METALS
METALS
2669
2B69
1031
1051
1031
LOCATION
(CITY)
KST MEMPHIS
EL DORADO
JACKSONVILLE
BAUXITE
BAUXITE
BAUXITE
RECEIVINB UATER NAME
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
TRIB. TO BOGGY CREEK
ROCKY BRANCH CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
COLD SPRING BRANCH
FOURCHE BAYOU
STREAM ROW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7Q10
470057 69646
58.1 1.14
0
0
PIPE FLOU
(MSD)
MEAN MAX.
0.037 0.067
0.24 4.67
0.13 0.61
2.9 3.1
0.03
SAMPLE
IUC COLLECTION
(t> DATE
0.0001 09-Dec-86
24.5 17-Apr-84
100 28-Nov-84
19-Nov-BS
100 19-NOV-85
19-Nov-BS
u-ruxni mT3iL«-/Lntruu». uwKHUcnlbllka
MINI-
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
10
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
12000
450
1500
1400
700
HARDNESS
(HG/L AS
CaC03)
52
95
299
190
161
TOTAL
RESID.
ALKALINITY M.OR-
(HG/L AS
C*C03>
69
110
28
27
14
pH INE
(SU) (HG/L)
7.9 (0.1
8.1
6.5
7.3
7.6
6.9
MUM
UNION- DO
IZED HG/L)
NH3 OR %
(HG/L) SAT.)
0.7 25X
8
8.8
8.2
8.2
8.9
i
I
:
i
i
i
! 1 NPDES 1
! 76 AR 0037770
! 77 AR 0037800
! 78 AR 0038312
! 79 AR 0041203
! 80 AR 0041211
i 81 AR 0041220
OUT-
FALL
1
002
009
001
009
001
007
FACILITY
!
NAME
CP80CNICAL
ENSCO
VERTAC
REYNOLDS
REYNOLDS
REYNOLDS
METALS
METALS
METALS
TEST SPECIES
C.
D.
D.
D.
D.
D.
VARIEGATUS
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
TEST
LENGTH
^^
-U-hLUtNl IUJUUIY
1X50 MORTALITY
Wtftfft
IW*
DAYS 24H 4BH CHRONIC EFFLUENT
8
1
1
1
1
1
2 100
5
0
0
0
0
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
INATED
EFRUENT
10
0
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
I (1
LUWUVIw
NOTE: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV
-------
i
1
I
1
1 NPOESI
I 1 LA 0000183
! 2 LA 0000191
! 3 LA 0000191
,' 4 LA 0000191
! 5 LA 0000281
! 6 LA 0000493
! 7 LA 0000493
! 8 LA 0000493
! 9 LA 0000604
! 10 LA 0000604
! 11 LA 0000752
,' 12 LA 0000732
! 13 LA 0000732
! 14 LA 0000761
1 15 LA 0000761
!
i MULiiT/nKLCiVinu mien jivunmiiui
STREAM FLOU
OUT-
CHI 1
FNLL
1 FACILITY NRK
001 REYNOLDS NETALS
001 UNION CARBIDE
001 UNION CARBIDE
001 UNION CARBIDE
001 BORDEN CHEMICAL
001 REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
001 REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
001 REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
001 COLONIAL SUGAR
002 COLONIAL SUGAR
001 UNIROYAL CHEMICAL CO.
001 UNIROYAL CHEMICAL CO.
001 UNIROYAL CHEMICAL CO.
001 PPG
001 PPB
C?P
811*
CODE
£999
£869
£869
£869
£869
£861
£861
2861
£062
2062
£822
2822
2822
2812
2812
i nraTtny
LULHIIIM
(CITY)
BATON ROUGE
HflHNVILLE
HAHNVILLE
HAHNVILLE
GEISMAR
OAKDALE
OAKDALE
OAKDALE
6RAMERCY
GRANERCY
GEISMAR
GEISMAR
6EISNAR
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
RECEIVING HATER NOME MEAN 7010
TR. TO BATON ROUGE B.
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
SWAMP TP COLONIAL CANAL
SWAMP TP COLONIAL CANAL
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BAYOU D< INDE
BAYOU D'INDE
31 6
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
918 27
918 27
918 27
84 10
8* 10
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
0
0
PIPE FLOU
(M6D)
MEAN MAX.
1.84 3.65
1.63 2.5*
1.63 2.5*
1.63 2.5*
1.63 2.54
0.15 0.3
0.15 0.3
0.15 0.3
8.97 10.5
0.07 0.11
0.53 1.0*
0.53 1.0*
0.53 1.0*
200 300
200 300
TUP
1HL
(*>
32.22
0.0023
0.0023
0.0023
0.0023
0.85
0.85
0.85
*7
1.67
0.0007
0.0007
0.0007
100
100
SAMPLE
rn i rrrtnu
LULLEL 1 1 1*1
DATE
22-Oct-B5
19-Jun-e*
19-Jun-e*
05-Mar-85
18-ftar-86
09-flpr-86
05-Dec-86
OS-Dec-86
18-Har-86
ia-Mar-86
ll-flug-87
ll-flug-87
ll-flug-87
29-Feb-B*
29-Feb-8*
SAL-
TNTTV
In i \ T
(0/00)
0
*
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
1
crrmc
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
fOUTf
1 WILC
(UttHO/CM)
500
4700
*700
5500
1*00
1700
700
700
900
500
590
590
590
MOO
MOO
ni rmaiLM
HARDNESS
(HB/L BS
CaC03>
*7
60
60
76
232
800
36
36
151
122
6*
6*
6*
19*
19*
I/LTCFIXLHI. l
ALKALINITY
(MC/I AC
ino/L HO
C-C03)
93
>600
>600
>600
114
158
203
203
123
62
0
0
0
72
72
jvm*
__
P"
ISU)
7.8
7.6
7.6
7.7
7.6
7.*
7.3
7.3
7.3
7
4.3
4.3
4.3
7.1
7.1
CK13I1U
TOTAL
RESID.
CH.OR-
1WT
int
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
UU7
PVU
(MG/L)
0.1
(0.1
(0.1
2.1
(0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
HUN
DO
(MB/L
np *
Un >
SAT.)
8.4
4.2
6.2
8.2
8.8
2.5
6.2
72*
7.8
*.8
87*
7.7
7.8
9.6
t
!
OUT-
C« 1
rnJL
t NPDES t t FACILITY NAME
1 LA 0000183 001 REYNOLDS NETALS
2 LA 0000191 001 UNION CARBIDE
3 LA 0000191 001 UNION CARBIDE
4 LA 0000191 001 UNION CARBIDE
5 LA 0000281 001 BORDEN CHEMICAL
6 LA 0000493 001 REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
7 LA 0000493 001 REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
8 LA 0000493 001 REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
9 LA 0000604 001 COLONIAL SUGAR
10 LA 0000604 002 COLONIAL SUGAR
11 LA 0000752 001 UNIROYAL CHEMICAL CO.
12 LA 0000752 001 UNIROYAL CHEMICAL CO.
13 LA 0000752 001 UNIRDYAL CHEMICAL CO.
14 LA 0000761 001 PPG
15 LA 0000761 001 PPG
I
trrLueni IUIILIIT ______
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100X PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
Til i ___.... TU Ift/W ThlflTrn i
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEI 1 50
P. PRONELAS 2 100
D. PULE* 2 16 12 100
D. PULEI 2 10 10 100 100
D. PULEI 1 0 0
D. PULEI 2 31 (1 100
D. PULEI 2 73 80
P. PROMELAS 8 13 100 25 10
0. PULEI 1 5
D. PULEI 2 43 43 100
P. PRONELAS 8 (25 100 (25 (25
SELENASTRUN 4 (6 100 (6 (6
D. PULEI 2 33 5 100
D. pan i o
P. PRONELAS 1 5
urmtN i a
NOTES: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONlC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
LC50 NOT CALCULABLE; 100* MORT. IN 10* EFFL.
SALINITY CONTROL NOT RUN
CI: 9-11(24 t 48H); NOTE HIGH COKD./ALK.
-
CI:38-38(2*H); MORT. IN DILUTIONS U/ SATISFACTORY DO
CI:6*-83
ChV=17X
-
CI: 37-51(24 J 4BH); CHLORINE NOT MEASURED
ChV(25*; NOTE LOW pH
ChV(6*; NOTE LOU pH
HI6H.Y TOXIC; NOTE LOU pH
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTOCAM
INSTR&HH
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO flCUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO flCUTE
NO flCUTE
NO BCUTE
-------
1
!
1
1
1
: * NPDESI
! 16 LA 0000641
I 17 LA 00006*1
! 18 LA 00008*1
! 19 LA 00006*1
! 20 Lfl 0000668
! 21 LA 0000676
! 22 LA 0000876
! 23 LA 000091*
! 24 LA 0001333
! 25 LA 0002771
I 26 LA 0002780
! 27 LA 0002909
! 28 LA 0002917
! 29 LA 0002933
! 30 LA 0002933
i , .
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY MC
001 EXXON CORP.
001 EXXON CORP.
001 EXXON CORP.
001 EHON CORP.
001 NESTVACO
002 KAISER ALUMINUM
002 KAISER ALUMINUM
001 COPOLYNER 1 CHEMICAL
001 U. R. GRACE 1 CO.
002 E. I. DUPONT
001 E. I. DUPONT
007 KAISER ALUMINUM
001 S.M. ELECTRIC POWER
001 VULCAN MATERIALS
001 VULCAN MATERIALS
SIC
CODE
2821
2821
2821
2621
2861
3334
3334
2822
2819
2819
2819
2819
4911
2869
2869
-THUILilT/KCLClVinU NHICT1 JWUIVMI 1UT
LOCATION
(CITY)
BATON ROUSE
BATON ROUGE
BATON ROUGE
BATON ROUGE
DERIDOER
CHALMETTE
CHALMETTE
BATON ROUSE
LAKE CHARLES
BURNSIDE
PINEVILLE
BATON ROUSE
MOORINBSPORT
GEISMAR
BEIBMRR
RECEIVING WATER NAME
CYPRESS BAYOU
CYPRESS BflYOU
CYPRESS BAYOU
CYPRESS BAYOU
PALMETTO CREEK
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MONTE SAND BAYOU
CALCASIEU RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
TR. TO FLAGON BAYOU
MONTE SflNO BAYOU
CAODOLAKE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
i~"" -- ' -
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
556 *6
556 *6
556 46
556 46
371 21
460000 111000
460000 111000
34 *
4*16 259
460000 111000
0 0
34 4
460000 111000
460000 111000
PIPE FLOW
(MED)
MEAN MAX.
0.2 0.28
0.2 0.28
0.2 0.28
0.2 0.28
0.91 3.26
3.01 18.77
3.01 18.77
2.*3 3.57
1.95 3.56
0.05 0.17
0.01 I.S6
124.3 268.4
1.13 2.11
1.13 2.11
IMC
(*)
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
6.29
0.0042
0.0042
46.52
1.15
0.00007
100
0.4
0.0016
0.0016
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
05-N»r-8S
03-Dec-86
03-Dec-66
03-Dec-B6
05-Feb-85
26-Feb-86
26-feb-B6
05-Jun-85
08-Apr-86
29-flpr-66
ll-Sep-85
19-Mar-65
25-feb-«6
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
4
0
0
25-act-63 I 56
23-flpr-e5 ! 74
crrmcni rmaiLHL/uiemiM. LnHrot.itniauL3
MINI-
TOTAL HUM
SPECIFIC RESID. UNION- DO
CONDUC- HARDNESS ALKALINITY CHOR- I ZED (MB/L
TANCE (NS/L AS (MG/L AS pH INE NH3 OR t
(UMHO/CM)
500
450
450
450
350
2600
2600
400
8000
590
135
76000
76000
CaC03)
24
44
44
44
26
397
397
40
124
37
16
CaC03)
119
76
76
75
34
324
324
51
54
34
14
(SU)
8.3
8.3
8.5
8.5
6.9
7.7
7.7
7.5
7.3
8.1
8
6.4
7.2
7.6
7.6
(MB/L) (MB/L) SAT.)
8.4
(0.1 0.8 821
(0.1 0.8 75X
(0.1 0.8 7
8.6
90S
8.2
8.4
92*
(0.1 (0.1 8.4
8.2
6.6
2 8
7.9
I
U)
1
!
!
1
1
1
: NPDESI
! 16 LA 0000841
i 17 LA 0000641
! 18 LA 0000641
! 19 LA 0000641
! 20 LA 0000668
! 21 LA 0000876
i 22 LA 0000076
I 23 LA 0000914
! 84 LA 0001333
! 25 LA 0002771
! 26 LA 0002780
! 27 LA 0002909
! 28 LA 0002917
! 29 LA 0002933
! 30 LA 0002933
OUT-
FALL
I
001
001
001
001
001
002
002
001
001
002
001
007
001
001
001
FACILITY NAK
EXXON CORP.
EXXON CORP.
EXXON CORP.
EXXON CORP.
HEBTVACO
KAISER ALUMINUM
KAISER ALUMINUM
COPOLYNER 1 CHEMICAL
U. R. BRACE ICO.
E. I. DUPONT
E. I DUPONT
KAISER ALUMINUM
S.U. ELECTRIC POWER
VULCAN MATERIALS
VULCAN MATERIAL
EFFLUENT
TEST SPECIES
D. PULEX
P. PROHEUB
CERIODAPHNIA
D. PULEX
D. PULEX .
P. PROHELAS
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
C. VARIEBATUS
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
N. BAHIA
M, BAHIA
TEST
LENGTH
III
IN -
DAYS 24H
2 66
8
7
2 81
1
7
1
1
6
2 50
1
1
2 89
2
2 16
LCSO
TOIICITY
MORTALITY
U A/U
~ ^^ 111 1W>
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
26
*7
26
68
5
7
100
60 70
10
too
0
0
0
0
100
too
0
0
60
100
100
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
DECHLCB- EFFLUENT
un-rrti
EFFLUENT LOEC NDEC
100
50 25
0
g
0
50 10
0
0
30
______
COHENTS !
! !
NOTES: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChVOODNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
_
ChV35*j CI:41-93
NO SIB. EFFECT
CI:69-94(24H)J 39-57I48H)
-
-
-
-
ChV=22«j NO SIB. HORT. IN SALINITY CONTROL
CI:39-64(24H)| 20-39(48H)| MORT. IN SALINITY CNTRL
-
-
CI: 71-100 (24H)i 60-100 (48H)
SALINITY CONTROL NOT RUN
C1:4-12(4SH>! 100* MORT. IN 46 1 74 o/oo CONTROLS
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAN
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
_____
-------
-FACILITY/RECEIVING HHTER INFORNATION-
-EFFLUENT PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS-
-I-
1
:
i
!
1
! NPDES I
1 31 LA 0003026
! 32 U) 0003026
! 33 LA 0003271
1 34 LA 0003271
! 33 Lfl 0003301
! 36 LA 0003301
! 37 LA 0003301
! 38 LA 0003301
I 39 LA 0003301
! 40 LA 0003301
! 41 LA 0003301
! 42 LA 0003301
1 43 LA 0003301
! 44 LA 0003301
! 43 LA 0003301
i i . .
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
521
321
321
Ml
311
001
001
001
321
2001
511
FACILITY MAC
CONDCO REFINERY
CONOCO REFIICRY
MORTON THIOKOL
NORTON THIOKOL
OOH CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
MM CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
DOH CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
SIC
CODE
2911
2911
2819
8819
2869
2869
2869
2869
2869
2869
2869
2869
2869
2B69
2869
LOCATION
(CITY)
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
WEEKS ISLAND
WEEKS ISLAND
PLABUEMINE
PLAQUENINE
PLMUENINE
PLAOUEMINE
PLAQUEMIME
PLAOUENINE
PLAQUEMINE
PLAOUENINE
PLAQUENINE
PLAOUEMINE
PLAOUEMINE
RECE1VINB HATER NAME
BAYOU VERDINE
BAYOU VERDINE
GULF INTRACOASTAL MU
GULF INTRACOASTAL UH
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
STREAM aw
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7D10
0
0
994 108
994 106
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
PIPE FUM
(MED)
MEAN
1.83
1.83
4.98
4.97
1.62
1.62
1.62
MAI.
3.44
3.44
23.1
8.39
3.07
3.07
3.07
1
1
1
SAMPLE !
IUC COLLECTION !
(X)
100
100
6.67
6.66
0.0083
0.0023
0.0023
DATE !
29-Feb-64 !
29-Feb-84 !
06-Apr-85 !
14-Aug-B6 !
15-Jul-87 !
15-Jul-67 !
15-Jul-87 !
15-Jul-87 !
15-Jul-87 !
15-Jul-87 !
15-Jul-B7 I
15-Jul-B7 1
15-Jul-B7 1
15-Jul-67 !
15-Jul-87 !
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
4
9
4
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
65
2
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UNHO/CM)
2700
2700
7500
12000
6000
2600
6000
1700
1700
3700
3700
3700
2600
1700
HARDNKS ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS (MG/L AS pH
CaC03)
220
£20
90
440
90
too
100
210
210
210
440
100
CaC03>
156
156
738
67
738
90
90
97
97
97
67
90
(SU)
7.2
7.2
B.Z
7.7
9.1
7.6
9.1
10.4
10.4
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.8
B
10.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L)
(0.1
1
(0.1
1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(HB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR t
SAT.)
6.8
5.8
8.6
93%
8
7
91*
6.1
93X
9W
811
8.2
I
u>
00
I
OUT-
1 NPDES I FACILITY NAME
31 LA 0003026 001 CONDCO REFINERY
32 LA 0003026 001 CONOCO REFINERY
33 LA 0003271 001 MORTON THIOKOL
34 LA 0003271 001 NORTON THIOKOL
35 LA 0003301 521 DOU CHEMICAL
36 LA 0003301 321 DOU CHEMICAL
37 LA 0003301 521 DOU CHEMICAL
38 LA 0003301 511 DOU CHEMICAL
39 LA 0003301 511 DOU CHEMICAL
40 LA 0003301 001 DOU CHEMICAL
41 LA 0003301 001 DOU CHEMICAL
42 LA 0003301 001 DOU CHEMICAL
! 43 LA 0003301 321 DON CHEMICAL
I 44 LA 0003301 2001 DOU CHEMICAL
i 43 LA 0003301 511 DOU CHEMICAL
i
U-FLLENT TUIICIIY
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TM III tfWtf TMflTTTl
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
P. PROMELAS 1 5
D. PULEI 1 0
D. PULEX 2 66 59 100 100
C. VARIE6ATUS 7 5
SELENASTRUM 4 48 18 (12 (12
D. PULEX 2 5
D. PULEX 1 (12 100 100
SELENASTRUN 4 34 100 50
P. PRONELAS 6 20
D. PULEI 2 10
SELENASTRUN 4 12 100 50
P. PROMELAS 8 20
P. PRONELAS 8 15
C. VBRIEBflTUS 9 33 100 50 25
D. PULEX 2 5
OJKNTS
NOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChVOffiONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
-
CI:60-72(24H); 52-6BI48H); 100* MDRT. IN 4 o/oo
-
ChVdaX; CELL NO. SIG. LOWER IN DECHL EFFL.
HIGHLY TOXIC; NOTE MORT. IN DECHL. EFFL.
ChV»7W
NO SIG. EFFECT
-
ChV»7Kj SLIGHT EFFECT
NO SIG. EFFECT
NO SIG. EFFECT
CHv*35<; ADEQUATE SURVIVAL IN 65 o/oo CONTROL
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTBCflH
inalncHn
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
-------
i
1 NPDES t
46 LA 0003301
47 LA 0003301
48 LA 0003476
49 LA 0003522
SO LA 0003349
51 LA 0003549
52 LA 0003349
53 LA 0003549
54 Lfl 0003654
55 LA 0003689
56 LA 0003689
57 LA 0003735
SB LA 0003733
59 LA 0003824
60 LA 0003834
IHtllllT/HCUIVlKO NHICI1 llWUIglHI im
OUT-
Ctt 1
rfU.
1
321
311
001
001
002
002
003
005
002
001
001
007
007
001
001
FACILITY NAME
DOU CHEMICAL
DOW CHEMICAL
VISTA CHEMICAL
SHELL OIL CO.
USA-LOU. ARMY AMMO. PLT
USA-LOU. ARMY AMMUN. PLT
USA-LOU. ARMY AMMO. PLT
USA-LOU. ARMY AMMO. PLT
ZAPATA HAYN1E
HIMONT-HERCULES
HIMDNT-HERCULES
LAKE CHARLES CARBON
LAKE CHARLES CARBON
FIRESTONE
FIRESTONE
otr
SIL
CODE
2869
2869
2869
2911
3483
3483
3483
3483
2077
2821
2821
3334
3334
2822
2822
(CITY)
PLAQUEMINE
PLAQUENINE
UESTLAKE
NORCO
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
CAMERON
CAMERON
CAMERON
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
STREAM FLOU
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
RECEIVING WATER NAME MEAN 7010
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
DITCH TO BAYOU VERDINE 0
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
BOQNE CREEK 1132 1.06
BOONE CREEK 1132 1
BOONE CREEK 1132 1.06
BOONE CREEK 1132 1.06
CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL 5346 363
CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL 4561 £60
CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL 4S81 360
CALCASIEU RIVER 4416 359
CALCASIEU RIVER 4416 £59
BAYOU d' INDE 300 0
BAYOU d' INDE 300 0
PIPE aw
IMBD)
MEAN MAX.
0.71 1.33
0.13 0.35
0.04 0.07
0.04 0.07
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01
0.1
1.56 2.71
1.56 2.71
0.3 1.01
0.3 1.01
0.8 2.3
0.8 3.3
TLT
1HL
(X)
100
0.00018
5.53
5.84
1.4
1.4
0.059
0.93
0.93
0.18
0.18
100
100
SAMPLE
rm i FPTTHN
LULLCLI l\jn
DATE
l5-Jul-B7
15-Jul-87
23-Jan-86
30-flpr-85
05-Nov-84
14-Hay-86
39-Feb-88
39-Feb-B8
15-Apr-86
04-+lar-85
04-Mar-86
31-flpr-86
21-Apr-86
16-Feb-BB
16-Feb-88
SAL-
TWlTV
in 1 i T
lo/oo)
2
20
0
2
4
0
0
5
3
3
0
0
0
0
crruucni KmaiLML/LntmLK, uviKHbiLtuaiiLa
SPECIFIC
CONDX-
Tourc
IHHLt
(UMHO/CM)
2600
3350
1300
3900
6900
750
750
10000
600
600
600
600
990
990
HARDNESS
/Up/) flC
tnb/L HO
CaC03)
440
794
188
738
1360
1636
69
69
148
148
ALKALINITY
/UC /I fiC
ino/L HO
CaC03)
67
115
104
34
137
270
743
743
146
146
(SU)
7.8
8.9
7.3
7.7
7.7
6.7
7.5
7.3
8.8
8.4
8.4
7.9
7.9
7.5
7.5
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
TWC
INC.
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
8.4
8.4
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
uut
Nru
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
1.4
1.4
0.2
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
HUM
DO
(MG/L
no <
UK >
SAT.)
92X
87X
7.2
8.8
7.8
86X
9BX
7BX
90X
7.4
7.6
93X
94X
94X
OUT-
rnt i
rHLL
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
46 LA 0003301 321 DOW CHEMICAL
47 LA 0003301 311 DON CHEMICAL
48 LA 0003476 001 VISTA CHEMICAL
49 LA 0003522 001 SHELL OIL CO.
50 LA 0003549 002 USA-LOU. ARMY MM. PLT
51 LA 0003549 002 USA-LOU ARMY AMMUN, PLT
52 LA 0003549 005 USA-LOU. ARMY ANNO. PLT
53 LA 0003549 005 USA-LOU. ARMY AMMO. PLT
54 LA 0003654 003 ZAPATA HAYNIE
55 LA 0003689 001 H1MQNT-HERCOES
56 LA 0003689 001 HIHONT-tEROJLES
57 LA 0003733 007 LAKE CHARLES CAftHM
58 LA 0003733 007 LAKE CHARLES CARBON
59 LA 0003824 001 FIRESTONE
60 LA 0003824 001 FIRESTONE
tFFLUfcWT TUHCirr
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100% PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
SLENASTRUH 4 45 (12 (12
C. VARIE6ATUB 9 66 100 100 50
P. PNONELAS 7 10
0. PULE! 1 0 0
D. PULEI 1 0
D. PULO 1 45 95
P. PRONEU8 8 23 100 25 12
D. PULEI 2 15
P. PRONOAS 7 40 100 50
P. PROHEUS 7 87 55 100 50
D. PULEI 1 71 100 90
D. PULEI 1 5
P. PROMELAS 7 10
D. PULEI 2 30
P. PROMELAS 8 10
CBWtW 1 b
NOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChVOttDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
ChVUW
ChV«71X
NO SIGNIFICANT MORTALITY
-
-
COMPLETE MORTALITY IN 4o/oo CONTROL
ChV*17»; NOTE DIFFERENCE FROM DAPHNIA RESPONSE
NOTE DIFFERENCE WITH FATHEAD MINNOW RESPONSE
ChV=71X; ADEQUATE SURVIVAL IN SALINITY CONTROL
ChV=71X; SALINITY CONTROL AND DECHL NOT TESTED
SALINITY CONTROL AND DECHLORINATED NOT TESTED
-
MORT. IN SOX EFa. PROB. DUE TO INFERT. EG6S
SIG. MORT. IN 100% EFFL.
NO SIG. EFFECT
POTENTIAL
FOR
1NQTRPQH
inoincffOT
tJ-1-tl.lb
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
I
U)
-------
I
!
:
!
!
! i MPDESI
1 61 LA 0004057
! 62 LA 0004090
! 63 LA 000*154
! 64 LA 0004154
! 65 LA 000*464
! 66 LA 0004847
! 67 LA 0005258
1 68 LA 0005258
! 69 LA 0005266
1 70 LA 0005347
1 71 Lfl 0005355
.' 72 LA 0005461
! 73 LA 0005487
i 74 LA 0005941
! 75 LA 0005941
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
003
003
FACILITY NAME
BRANT CHEMICAL
ETHYL CORP.
COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
6CHUYKILL METALS
FREEPORT CHEMICAL
GEORGIA PACIFIC
GEORGIA PACIFIC
MONSANTO
(UN CO.
E»ON
GENERAL ELECTRIC
CIBA-GEI6Y
CITCO CITIES SERVICE
CITCO CITIES SERVICE
SIC LOCATION ,
CODE (CITY) RECEIVINB UATER NAME
£869 LAKE CHARLES DITCH TO BATON ROUGE B.
2869 BATON ROUGE MONTE SRNO BAYOU
2895 FRANKLIN INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
2895 FRANKLIN INTRACOASTAL UATERUAY
3332 E. BATON ROUGE BATON ROUSE BAYOU
2874 UNCLE SAM MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2611 ZACHARY MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2611 ZACHARY MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 U1IN6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 LAKE CHARLES CALCASIEU RIVER
2821 BATON ROUGE FORTUNE BAYOU
3612 SHREVEPORT BOGGY BAYOU
2879 SAINT BABRia MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2911 LAKE CHARLES CALCASIEU RIVER
2911 LAKE CHARLES CALCASIEU RIVER
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
51 6.62
33.6 4.1
50.9 0
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
4416 859
15 2
46 0
460000 111000
4416 259
4416 259
PIPE FLOU
(MBD)
HEW MAX.
17.7 27.1
7.76 14.4
1.4 1.8
1.4 1.8
0.27 2.08
144 192
24.65 44.2
24.65 44.2
0.12 0.36
2.16 3.81
1.13 2.95
3.3 11.9
38 150
38 150
I UC
(*>
82.05
80.56
100
0.2
0.034
0.034
0.00017
1.28
46.67
0.005
18.53
18.53
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
lBHtar-86
17-Sep-85
27-Aug-87
27-Aug-B7
20-flug-85
15-flpr-84
ll-flug-87
ll-flug-B7
Ol-Nov-63
lB-Jun-66
08-Jul-85
OS-Aug-84
02-Feb-8B
04-Mar-66
04-Mar-86
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
4
2
2
0
3
T
6
0
15
S
2
tl-l-LUtfll KrtTblUHL/UtFUUHL
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UKHO/CH)
9000
750
4200
4200
4000
900
2750
2750
750
390
6500
6500
HARDNESS
(KG/L AS
CaC03)
112
73
214
214
126
144
400
400
40
64
102
102
UWKHLItKlbUCS
ALKALINITY
(KS/L AS
CaC03)
203
111
104
104
124
(40
198
198
180
25
95
95
PH
(SU)
7.8
7.6
7.5
7.5
9
2.9
7.5
7.5
7.4
8.2
6.7
6.9
7.7
7.7
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(KS/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MG/L)
2.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
(0.1
0.3
)3.6
)3.6
MINI-
NM
DO
(MG/L
OR t
SflT.)
5.1
7.4
92*
8.4
8.2
8.2
62*
7.4
87*
6.2
6.6
90*
87*
7.8
1
I
!
t
OUT-
cat i
rFU.
1 NPDES I 1 FACILITY NAME
61 LA 0004057 001 GRANT CHEMICAL
62 LA 0004090 001 ETHYL CORP.
63 LA 0004154 001 COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
64 LA 0004154 001 COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
65 LA 0004464 001 SCHUYXILL METALS
66 LA 0004847 001 FREEPORT CHEMICAL
67 LA 0006258 001 6EOR6IA PACIFIC
68 LA 0005258 001 GEORGIA PACIFIC
69 LA 0005266 001 MONSANTO
70 LA 0005347 001 OLIN CO.
71 LA 0005353 001 EIION
72 LA 0005461 001 GENERAL ELECTRIC
73 LA 0005487 001 CIBA-GEI6Y
74 LA 0005941 003 CITCO CITIES SERVICE
75 LA 0005941 003 CITCO CITIES SERVICE
: tt-l-LUtNl UUICIIY
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEI 2 71 71
D. PULO 1 100 SO 20
P. PRONELAS 8 5
D. PULEI 2 15
D. PULEI 1 0 0
D. PULEX 2 13 10 100 100
P. PRONELAS 4 57 100 100 50
D. PULEI 2 5
D. PULEI 2 0
C. VARIEGATUS 6 25 100 75
0. PULO 2 00
D. PULEX 1 0
C, VARIEGATUS 9 54 100 100 50
P. PRONELAS 7 25 25 10
D. PULEI 1 81 65 SO
OMtNTS
NOTES! CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV
-------
I NPOESI
76 LA 0005983
77 LA 0005983
78 LA 0005991
79 LA 0005991
80 LA 0006041
81 LA 0006041
82 LA 0006131
83 LA 0006131
84 LA 0006131
85 LA 0006131
86 LA 0006831
87 LA 0006831
88 LA 0006831
89 LA 0006963
90 LA 0007129
OUT-
Cfll 1
FILL
1 FACILITY NAME
001 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL
001 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL
001 KAISER ALUMINUM
001 KAISER ALUMINUM
001 TEXACO
001 TEXACO
001 TECWI6RAPHICS
001 TECHNIBRAPHICS
001 TECHNIGRAPHICS
001 TECHNIGRAPHICS
001 BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
001 BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
001 BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
105 CANAL REFINERY
102 6EOR6IA GULF
CtP
alt
CODE
2812
2812
2819
2819
2911
2911
2621
2621
2621
2621
4941
4941
4941
2911
2869
-THUILi IT/RCLC
i imrtnu
LULNilUN
(CITY)
TUFT
TAFT
BRAHERCY
6RANERCY
CONVENT
CONVENT
LOCKPORT
LOCKPORT
LOCKPORT
LOCKPORT
BELLE CHASSE
BELLE CHASSE
BELLE CHASSE
CHURCH POINT
PLADUENINE
ivino iwicw inruronuuM
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
RECEIVING WATER NAME MEAN 7010
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
ST JAMES CANAL 84 10
ST JAMES CANAL 84 10
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL 0
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL 0
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL 0
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL 0
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
TR. TO BAYOU PLAQUEMINE 155 7
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
PIPE FLOW
(M6D)
MEAN MAX.
2.47 5.52
2.47 5.52
38.2 75
38.2 75
1.72 7.1
1.72 7.1
2.97 8.2
2.97 8.2
2.97 8.2
2.97 8.2
0.19 0.3
0.19 0.3
0.19 0.3
0.01 0.02
1.84 3.67
tup
IHL
(*)
0.0034
0.0034
0.053
0.053
21.08
100
100
100
too
0.0003
0.0003
0.0003
0.23
0.00%
SAMPLE
m I CPTTflU
CuLLfcLlluN
DATE
07-Feb-84
30-Apr-B5
14-Sep-87
14-Sep-87
ll-feb-86
ll-Feb-86
15-Apr-86
04-Aug-«7
W-flug-87
04-Aug-87
22-Jul-87
22-Jul-87
22-Jul-B7
04-Jun-85
12-May-86
crrujeni iruaibtv/ucmu*.
SAL-
TUT TV
INI IT
(o/oo)
IB
38
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TQUTT
IHwX
(UMHO/CM)
50000
1500
1500
2100
2100
900
6000
6000
6000
1190
1190
1190
790
HARDNESS
/we /i nc
Ino/L Ha
CaC03)
122
122
226
226
186
126
126
126
294
294
294
248
UWIWU t« 13 ULS
ALKALINITY
IMC /I AC '
Ino/L Ha
CiC03>
94
94
143
145
202
104
104
104
171
171
171
290
t"
7.6
8.9
8.9
7.3
7.3
7.7
7.3
7.3
7.3
8
8
8
7.9
8
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
f UC
INc
(MS/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
(NB/L)
0.4
0.4
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
i
MINI- :
HUH !
DO !
(MB/L 1
WW 1
% I
SAT.) !
a :
95* :
8.1 1
7.6 !
77* 1
77* !
8.1 !
i
88* i
8 !
90* i
1
6 :
84* :
!
NPOESI
76 LA 0005983
77 LA 0005983
78 LA 0005991
79 LA 0005991
80 LA 0006041
81 LA 0006041
82 LA 0006131
83 LA 0006131
84 LA 0006131
85 LA 0006131
86 LA 0006831
87 LA 0006831
88 LA 0006831
89 LA 0006963
90 LA 0007129
i
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
105
102
.-...--.--.---I.I -
FACILITY NAME
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL
KAISER AUMINLM
KAISER AUMINLM
TEXACO
TEXACO
TEDWIBRAPHICS
TECHNI8RAPHICS
TECHNI6DAPH1CS
TECHNIGMPHICS
BELLE CHASSE HATER WORKS
BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
BELLE CHRBSE WATER WORKS
CANAL REFINERY
6EDR8IABULF
TEST SPECIES
M. BAHIA
M. BAHIA
P. PROMEUB
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
P. PRQMELAB
P. PROHELAS
D. PULEI
SELENRSTRUH
P. PROHELAS
D. PULEX
P. PROMEUS
SELENASTRUN
D. PULEI
C. VARIEBATUS
TEST
LENGTH
IN -
crrucni iimiiii
LCSO MORTAIITY
Til IA/W
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
2
2
8
2
1
7
7
2
4
7
2
8
4
2
8
19 100
33 100
52 100
44 75
5
91 60
0
15
46
10
15
10
24 92
51 4 100
100
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
INfiTED
EFRUENT
too
0
100
i mittMia
CHRONIC !
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFRUENT
LOEC NOEC
SO 25
75 50
(6 (6
(12 (12
100 50
NOTES: CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
.
!
1
1
! POTENTIAL
ChV4HRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
: FOR
! INSTREAN
1 EFFECTS
STRESS OBSERVED IN 100* EFFL. AFTER 15 MIN.
NO MORTALITY IN 38 o/oo SALINITY CONTROL
ChV-35*; ADEQUATE SURVIVAL IN SALINITY CONTROL
20* HORT. IN 3 o/oo SALINITY CONTROL
ChV°61*; CI 178-100) DEOURINATED NOT TESTED
-
-
ChV(6X
-
-
-
0)V(12*| CI 120-28
CIi27-96(24H)| 2-7I48H)
0)V«71*
1 NO
! NO
! NO
I NO
: NO
: NO
: NO
: NO
: YES
! NO
: NO
: NO
: NO
I NO
! NO
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
-------
1
NPDESI
91 LA 0007129
92 LA 0007129
93 LA 0007129
94 LA 0007129
95 LA 0007129
% LA 0007129
97 LA 0007501
98 LA 0007579
99 LA 0007579
'100 LA 0007684
HOI LA 0007684
1102 LA 0007854
1103 LA 0007854
1104 LA 0007854
1105 LA 0007927
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NAME
002 GEORGIA GULF
003 GEORGIA GULF
102 GEORGIA GULF
002 GEORGIA GULF
003 GEORGIA GULF
102 GEORGIA GULF
001 CHEMICAL BOND CORP.
005 LOU. POUER t LIGHT
005 LOU. POUER 1 LIGHT
001 STONE CONTAINER CORP.
001 STONE CONTAINER CORP.
001 IMC CHEMICAL GROUP
001 IMC CHEMICAL GROUP
001 INC CHEMICAL GROUP
001 BOISE SOUTHERN
DfP
SIC
CODE
2859
2869
2869
2869
2869
2869
2869
4911
4911
2621
2621
2869
2869
2869
2621
-THLILllT/KtU
i imiTtnu
LULHTIW
(CITY)
PLAQUENINE
PLAQUEMINE
PLAQUENINE
PLAQUEMINE
PLAQUENINE
PLAQUENINE
DDDSON
STERLIN6TON
STERLINGTON
HODGE
HODGE
STERLINGTON
STERLINBTON
STERLINGTON
DERIDDER
iviwj witx iiruivMiiur
RECEIVING WATER NAME
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
DITCH TO BRUSHY CREEK
OUACHITA RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
DUGDEHOM) RIVER
DU6DEMQNA RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
DITCH TO CYPRESS CREEK
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
0.7 0
6314 273.74
6314 273.74
325 1.805
325 1.205
6314 273.74
6314 273.74
6314 273.74
500 84
PIPE FLOU
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
3.84 8.72
0.87 7.62
1.84 3.67
3.84 8.72
0.87 7.62
1.84 3.67
0.0360.112
65 65
65 65
11.42
11.42
8.59 3.42
8.59 3.48
8.59 3.48
23.98 61.5
tup
1m.
0.0054
0.0012
0.0086
0.0054
0.0012
0.0086
100
£6.9
86.9
61.84
61.24
1.45
1.45
1.45
37.79
SAMPLE
m i crTirfci
LULLcUf 1UH
DATE
12-May-86
12-*ay-B6
12-MarB6
12-May-B6
t »» fclmij flf
IC^najr^OO
Oa-feb-88
05-Mar-B5
83-Jun-86
23-Jun-86
16-Jul-86
16-Jul-66
19-May-«7
19-«iy-87
19-4toy-87
05-Feb-B5
SAL-
1MTTV
ini i T
(0/00)
20
12
14
20
12
IS
1
0
0
2
2
4
4
A
0
crrmc
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
(UNHO/Of)
2800
1200
1800
1300
1300
3400
3400
3400
8000
ni pmaiiH
HARDNESS
fHC/l OC
lna/L Ha
CaC03)
58
200
200
72
72
108
108
102
138
LimcmLML i
ALKALINITY
fHG/1 OC
ino/L Ha
CaC03)
367
85
85
533
533
95
95
95
74
nwn.
(SU>
8.3
8.7
8
8
8.8
8.4
8.3
6.6
6.6
8.3
8.3
8.6
8.6
8.6
7.3
cniaiiLa
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
(NB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
U17
IWU
(HB/L)
0.3
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.6
8.5
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
3.4
3.4
3.4
i
MINI- :
MUM t
DO i
(MG/L !
W< 1
> i
SAT.) 1
j
5.8 !
8.1 t
7.9 !
91* !
83* :
90S I
8.6 t
9.1 i
87* :
8.4 i
BOS 1
6.8 1
BBS 1
1
8.8 !
-EFFLUENT TOXICITY-
NJ
I
-COHMENTS-
OUT-
CM 1
rNLL
NPDESI t FACILITY NAME
91 LA 0007129 002 GEORGIA GULF
92 LA 0007129 003 GEORGIA GULF
93 LA 0007129 102 GEORGIA GULF
94 LA 0007129 002 GEORGIA GULF
95 LA 0007129 003 GEORGIA GULF
96 LA 0007129 102 GEORGIA GULF
97 LA 0007501 001 CHEMICAL BOND CORP.
98 LA 0007579 005 LOU. POUER 1 LIGHT
99 LA 0007579 005 LOU. POUER 1 LIGHT
100 LA 0007684 001 STONE CONTAINER CORP.
101 LA 0007684 001 STONE CONTAINER CORP.
1102 LA 0007854 001 IMC CHEMICAL GROUP
1103 LA 0007854 001 IMC CHEMICAL GROUP
1104 LA 0007854 001 IMC OCMICAL GROUP
1103 LA 0007927 001 BOISE SOUTHERN
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
W t y irt/w tM/vrrn
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
C. VARIEGATUS 2 100 50
C. VARIE6ATVS 1 5
C. VARIEGATUS 1 0
C. VARIEGATUS 8 100 100 50
C. VARIEGATUS 8 100 100 50
C. VARIEGATUS 9 54 100 100 50
D. PULEX 1 0 0
D. PULEX 1 0
P. PROHELAS 7 0
D. PULEX 1 0
P. PRONELAS 7 5
D. PULEX 2 16 16 90*
P. PRONELAS 8 8 100 12 6
SELENASTRUI 4 91 50 25
D. PULEI 1 0 0
NOTESi CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChV»CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO MORTALITY IN 50* EFFLUENT
-
-
O)V»71X
ChV»71*
ChV-71*
-
-
-
-
-
tWRTALITY DATA FOR 50* EFFL.
ChV-9*
OiV-35*; STIMULATORY IN 6* AND 12* EFFL.
-
!
POTENTIAL !
FOR
fUCTOC^M
INaTHcflV
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
-------
1
f NPDEBI
1106 LA 0006036
!107 LA 0020044
1108 LA 0020087
1109 Lfl 0020087
1110 LA 0020067
Illl LA 0029769
1112 LA 0029769
1113 LA 0029769
1114 LA 0029769
! 115 LA 0029963
1116 LA 0032281
1117 LA 0032221
1118 LA 0032221
1119 LA 0032417
1120 LA 0032417
I HLlLlil'TCtcivinu mien uruimium
OUT-
CM 1
FULL
1 FACILITY MANE
004 CLECO
001 PLAIN DEALING
001 OBERLIN
001 OBERLIN
001 OBERLIN
001 ABRICO CHEMICAL
001 ASRICO CHEMICAL
001 ABRICO CHEMICAL
001 ABRICO CHEMICAL
001 GULF OIL CHEMICAL
004A USA-FORT POLK
001A USA-fORT POLK
001A USA-FORT POLK
001 ATLAS PROCESSING
001 ATLAS PROCESSING
DfP
BIC
CODE
4911
4952
4952
4952
4952
2873
2873
2873
2873
2865
9711
9711
9711
2911
£911
i nmTtm
LULHTIUI
(CITY)
BOYCE
PLAIN DEALING
OBERLIN
OBERLIN
OBERLIN
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
ST. JANES
FORT POLK
FORT POLK
FORT POLK
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
RECEIVING WATER NAME
LAKE RODEMACHER
CYPRESS BAYOU
BAYOU BLUE
BAYOU BLUE
BAYOU BLUE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BUNDICK CREEK
DRAKES CREEK
DRAKES CREEK
BRUSHY BAYOU
BRUSHY BAYOU
STREAM ROM
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
234 3
124 0.08
119.2 7.02
119.2 7.02
119.2 7.02
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
371 27
371 27
371 27
20 0.3
20 0.3
PIPE FLOW
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
1.45 7.66
0.17 0.35
0.25 0.7
0.25 0.7
0.25 0.7
5.09 11.6
5.09 11.8
5.04 11.8
5.04 11.8
0.2 0.38
0.79 3.02
1.1 3.3
1.1 3.3
1.36 8.48
1.36 8.48
(*)
42.66
76.47
5.23
5.23
5.23
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.00028
4.33
5.94
5.94
87.54
87.54
SAMPLE
PYH 1 CPTTflU
LUU-CLIIUN
DATE
27-Mar-84
06-flug-85
21-Jul-87
21-Jul-87
21-Jul-fl7
26-Aug-87
26-flug-87
Oe-feb-88
Oe-feb-88
06-Jun-85
05-Aug-B6
15-Stp-«7
15-Sep-fl7
26-Jun-84
17-Nov87
urLumi pm3iu«./ircmLHL. uwwutKI&llLb
SAL-
fut TV
mi IT
(0/00)
0
0
0
0
i
i
0
0
1
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TOUPC
IHNLC
(UHHO/CM)
180
1000
4900
4900
4900
1400
1400
1250
1250
26000
400
390
390
1700
690
HARDNESS
{MR /I OK
tnu/L Ha
CiC03>
66
32
37
37
37
376
376
30
56
56
270
ALKALINITY
fHC/I AC -*1
Ino/L Ha
CaC03)
52
403
82
82
82
58
58
97
95
95
61
f
(SU)
8.4
8.5
7.1
7.1
7.1
7
7
6.9
6.9
8.4
10
9.5
9.5
8
7.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
IUT
IPt
(HE/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.9
0.2
0.2
(0.1
MINI- t
HUN 1
DO !
(HB/L 1
V '
% t
SAT.) !
8.4 1
7.2 I
87* !
1
6.2 1
8.2 t
94* 1
1
100* 1
6.2 1
6.4 t
91* 1
7.6 I
6.2 1
64* I
CO
1
!
J
!
*
t
i
! NPDES 1
!I06 Lfl 0006036
,'107 LA 0020044
1108 LA 0020067
! 109 LA 0020067
1110 LA 0020087
Illl LA 0029769
!112 LA 0029769
! 113 LA 0029769
1114 LA 0029769
1115 LA 0029963
1116 LA 0032221
1117 LA 0032221
1118 LA 0032221
11 19 LA 0032417
1120 LA 0032417
i
"
OUT-
tot i
rtnJL
t FACILITY NAME
004 CLECO
001 PLAIN DEALINB
001 OBERLIN
001 OBERLIN
001 OBERLIN
001 ASRICO CHEMICAL
001 ASRICO CHEMICAL
001 ASRICO CHEMICAL
001 A6RICO CHEMICAL
001 6ULF OIL CHEMICAL
004A USA-FORT POLK
001A USA-fORT POLK
001A USA-fORT POLK
001 ATLAS PROCESSING
001 ATLAS PROCESSING
.
TEST SPECIES
0. PULEX
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
SELENASTRUN
D. PULEX
D. PULE!
P. PROHELAS
SELENflSTRUH
D. PULEX
N. 8AHIA
D. PULEX
P. PROHELAS
D. PULEI
D. PULEI
P. PROCLAS
.
TEST
LENGTH
DAYS 2
2
2
8
4
2
2
8
4
1
1
2
8
2
1
7
EFFLUENT TUIICITY
LCSO MORTALITY
TM IfYrt
"- In lw>
4H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
75
78 100
15
(12 94
5
5
15
54
5
0
20
65 100
0
0
47 100
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFRUENT
TtiMvrrt
EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
100
(12 (12
100 50
0
100 SO
50 25
COVENTS
NOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
QiVcOffiONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
4C TB1P. DIFF. BETWEEN CONTROL AND 100* EFR.
CIi 67-77
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
ChV(l2S
-
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
ChV*71*; STIMULATORY IN 50* AND LESS EFR.
-
-
NOTE HIGH pH (10.3)
ChV=71X
-
ChV=35X; CI 139-58
1
:
POTENTIAL
FOR
IthlCTDCOM
INbTntW
EFFECTS
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO flCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
-------
1
1
i
1
1
1
: NPDESI
1121 LA 0032417
1122 LA 0032417
1123 LA 0034568
1124 LA 0036340
1125 LA 0036366
1126 LA 0038091
1127 LA 0038091
i 128 LA 0038091
1129 LA 0038741
1130 LA 0039390
1131 LA 0041023
!132 LA 0041394
1133 LA 0041718
1134 LA 0041751
1135 LA 0046477
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
ATLAS PROCESSINB
ATLAS PROCESSINB
BERNICE
LAKE CHARLES PLT A
LAKE CHARLES PLT C
NEW ORLEANS-E. BANK
NEU ORLEANS-E. BANK
NEU ORLEANS-E. BflNK
MONROE
PLACID REFININB
CERTAIN TEED
SHREVEPORT
KAISER fUHlNUN
EUNICE
JONESBORO
BIC
CODE
2911
2911
4952
4958
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
2911
2821
4952
2819
4952
4952
-THLiLiii/ncu:
LOCATION
(CITY)
SHREVEPORT
GHREVEPORT
BERNICE
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
NEU ORLEANS
NEW ORLEANS
NEU ORLEANS
MONROE
PORT ALLEN
LAKE CHARLES
SHREVEPORT
BATON ROUSE
EUNICE
JONESBORO
ivinu wicn iiwuwwi iurr
RECEIVINB HATER NAME
BRUSHY BAYOU
BRUSHY BAYOU
BAYOU D'ARBONNE
CALCASIEU RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
PP6 CANAL/BAYOU D'INDE
RED RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BAYOU MALLET
DUGDEMONA CREEK
STREAM ROW
(CFS) PIPE ROW
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
MEAN 7Q10 MEAN MAI.
20 0.3 1.36 8.48
20 0.3 1.36 8.48
214 0 0.25 0.38
4416 259 4.56 15.84
4416 259 3.15 6.7
460000 111000 86.2 106.2
460000 111000 86.2 106.2
460000 111000 86.2 106.2
1694 720 8.87 33.87
460000 111000 0.52 0.72
500 300 0.72 1.04
24210 1150 26.82 57.89
460000 111000 0.69 1.04
154 7.2 1.19 2
56.52 0.02 0.4
I WC
(X)
87.54
87.54
100
2.66
1.85
0.12
0.12
0.12
1.81
0,0007
0.37
3.49
0.001
30.1
96.8
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
17-Nov-87
17-Nov-87
06-Mar-B5
09-Oct-B4
09-Oct-84
08-Dec-87
08-Dec-87
OB-Dec-87
23-Jun-86
Ol-Nov-83
10-Feb-B6
14-May-86
19-Mar-85
26-Feb-85
23-Jun-87
U-t-LUtHI mYb!LH./UtfULH. LMHKHUItKlbl Iti
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
690
690
390
900
700
1000
1000
1000
700
935
700
29000
600
550
HARDNESS
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
20
96
86
88
86
118
26
126
55
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
C.C03)
60
157
242
38
74
68
>BOO
158
128
PH
(SU)
7.4
7.4
7.1
7.4
7.2
7
7
7
6.1
7.3
7.4
8.9
7.2
7.2
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
2.8
2.8
2.8
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR X
SAT.)
7.1
7.4
8.7
8.7
8.6
91X
8.8
B. 6
8.3
8
8.8
!
!
!
; OUT-
pju i
! « NPDES 1 1
1121 LA 0032417 001
! 122 LA 0032417 001
1123 LA 0034568
M24 LA 0036340 001
!125 LA 0036366
1126 LA 0038091 001
i 127 LA 0038091 001
1128 Lfl 0038091 001
!129 LA 0038741 001
; 130 Lfl 0039390 001
1131 LA 0041025 001
1132 LA 0041394 001
!133 LA 0041718 001
! 134 LA 0041751 001
1135 LA 0046477 001
!
FACILITY NOME
ATLAS PROCESSINB
ATLAS PROCESSINB
BERNICE
LAKE CHARLES PLT A
LAKE CHARLES PLT C
NEU ORLEANS-E. BANK
NEU ORLEANS-E. BANK
NEU ORLEANS-E. BANK
MONROE
PLACID REFININB
CERTAIN TEED
SHREVEPORT
KAISER ALUMINUM
EUNICE
JONESBORO
TEST SPECIES
SELENRBTRUM
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
BELENflSTRLM
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
D. PLLEX
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
P. PRQMELAS
H. RLXYRA
D. PULEX
SELENASTRUM
_______
ti
TEST
LENGTH
1 M
in
DAYS 24H
4
1
2 77
2 17
2 4
4
1 (6
7
I
2
1
1
2 12
2 4
4
i-Lutw luium
LC50 MORTALITY
Wi/yyt
l\fljl>
4BH CHRONIC EFFLUENT
4
40
74 80
17 100
4 100
(3 94<
100
27 100
5
0
0
0
3 100
4 100
11 63
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100% PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TMQTPH
Inn 1 CU -
EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
0
0
0
(3 (3
5
20 50 25
0
100
0
12 6
CVHtNTS
NOTES: CI=95X CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRQNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO SIG. EFFECT
-
-
-
-
ChV(3X; *DATA FOR SOX EFFU i DECHL EFFL. STIM.
-
ChV=35X
-
GREEN ALGAE PRESENT IN SAMPLE
INSTREAM DILUTION FROM PPG'S DISCHARGE
-
CI: 10-16(24H); 2-4I48H)
-
ChV=9X
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTOCfiM
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
-------
I'
!
!
1
1
I 1 NPOESI
!I36 LA 0046477
1137 LA 0046477
.'138 LA 0051993
1139 LA 0051993
1140 LA 0052370
!141 LA 0052370
!142 LA 0053716
! 143 LA 0056502
! 144 LA 0056651
! 145 LA 0056651
!146 LA 0059153
1147 LA 0059153
:148 LA 0059153
i
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
JONESBORD
JONESBORO
CLARK OIL
CLARK OIL
CALCASIEU REFININB
CALCASIEU REFININB
BOSSIER CITY
MANY
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
STREAM FLOU
(CFS) PIPE FLOU
(TENTATIVE) (NGD) SAMPLE
DIP i nroTTny > i TUT rn i rrTirw
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING UATER NAME KAN 7Q10 MEAN MAX. (*) DATE
4992 JONESBORO DUBDEMONA CREEK 56.52 0.02 0.4 96.8 23-Jun-87
4952 JONESBORO DUBDEMONA CREEK 56.52 0.02 0.4 96.8 23-Jun-87
2911 NT. AIRY MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000149370 0.05 0.120.00006 09-Apr-B4
2911 NT. AIRY MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000149370 0.03 0.120.00006 09-Apr-84
2911 LAKE CHARLES CALCASIEU RIVER 4581 260 0.03 0.06 0.018 17-Feb-88
2911 LAKE CHARLES CALCASIEU RIVER 4581 260 0.03 0.06 0.018 17-Feb-88
4952 BOSSIER CITY RED RIVER 19203 972 5.5 12.7 0.87 03-Nov-87
4952 MANY BAYOU LA NANA 101.15 0.69 0.36 1.72 44.71 10-Seo-BS
2631 DE SOTO P. RED RIVER 22353 1016 5.9 13.8 0.89 02-Nov-87
2631 DE GOTO P. RED RIVER 22353 1016 3.9 13.8 0.89 02-Nov-87
2833 LIVINGSTON POOLEY BR. TO AHITE R. 306.5 2.9 17.2 1.45 20-Oct-B6
2633 LIVINGSTON POOLEY BR. TO AHITE R. 306.5 2.9 17.2 1.43 20-Oct-66
2833 LIVINGSTON POOLEY BR. TO AHITE R. 306.5 2.9 17.2 1.45 20-Oct-86
crrmcni hniajirfm./Lrejniwm. LranHUlLnjai 1L3
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
A
4
0
0
0
2
2
2
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/00
550
530
2500
2600
6000
6000
1200
700
3200
3200
350
350
350
HARDNESS
(KS/L AS
CaC03)
55
55
367
367
49
53
53
53
ALKALINITY
(KB/L AS
CaC03)
128
128
130
130
64
60
60
60
pH
(SU)
7.2
7.2
7.9
7.9
8.4
8.4
6.9
7.1
8.4
8.4
8.2
8.2
8.2
TOTAL
RESID. UNION-
CHLOR- I ZED
INE NH3
(KS/L) (MG/L)
(0.1 0.1
(0.1 0.1
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
0.2
0.2
(0.1
4.8
4.8
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
i
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR *
SAT.)
83*
7.7
7.6
6.4
93*
93*
8.4
71*
93*
8.2
92* !
i
r
!
!
!
,
1
! 1 NPDE5 I
M36 LA 0046477
!137 LA 0046477
U38 LA 0051993
1139 LA 0051993
1140 LA 0052370
!141 LA 0052370
1142 LA 0053716
! 143 LA 0056502
!144 LA 0056651
! 145 LA 0056651
!146 LA 0059153
1147 LA 0059153
1148 LA 0059153
OUT-
fCtl
rnjL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
JONESBORO
JONESBORO
CLARK OIL
CLARK OIL
CALCASIEU REFININB
CALCASIEU REFININB
BOSSIER CITY
MANY
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
TEST SPECIES
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
SELENASTRUM
D. PULEX
SELENASTRUM
P. PROMELAS
CERIODAPHNIA
D. PULEX
P. PRDMELAS
Lrruucni
TEST
LENGTH LC50
TM
in
DAYS 24H 48H O
7
2
1
1
2
8
4
2 IS 15
4
7
7
2
8
IUAILJ II
MORTALITY
TM 1fWl
- in iw/*
IRONIC EFFLUENT
87 55
0
0
0
79 75
30
74 56
100
41
36 90
0
5
10
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFRIENT
TUQTCn
InHlcU .»
EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
25 12
100 50
25 12
0
12 6
50 25
-UjnncN 1 3
NOTES: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFauENT
ChV=17X
-
-
CI:66-96
ChV=71*
ChV=17*; CI. -59-99
CI: 12-17 (24 ( 46H)
ChV=9*j NOTE HIGH NH3
ChV=35*i CI:27-48j NOTE HIGH NH3
NO SIB. EFFECT
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
"
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTDTQM
leal ntHn
EFFECTS
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
I
*>.
Ul
-------
1
I
!
!
1
! 1 NPOESI
! 1 NN 0000159
! 2 NN 0020737
1 3 NN 0028100
! 4 NN 0028355
! 5 NN 0028827
i 6 NM 0028827
- " -1 HULllT/TCLtlVlHU «Hlc.n 1IWUIWMUU1
OUT-
1 FACILITY NAME
008 GENERAL ELECTRIC
001 GRANTS
001 GULF MINERAL RESOURCES
050 USDE-LOS ALAMOS NTL LAB
001 LAS VEGAS
001 LAS VEGAS
CODE
3724
4952
1094
4612
4952
4952
(C1TY>
ALBUQUERQUE
GRANTS
SAN MATED
LOS ALAMOS
LAS VEBAS
LAS VEGAS
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (NBD)
RECEIVING UATER NANE MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
SAN JOSE DR. /RIO GRANDE 1021 0 0.8
RIO SAN JOSE 6.73 0.99 1.04 1.56
TRIB. TO SAN MIGUEL CR. 0 6.28 7.1
TRIB. TO RIO GRANDE 169 0.015 0.042
GILLINAS RIVER 0.1 1.57 2.4
6ILLINAS RIVER 0.1 1.57 2.4
(*)
100
100
100
0.014
96.05
96.05
SAMPLE
DATE
21-May-87
19-NOV-85
10-Apr-84
U-Mir-86
15-Sep-e6
28-Dec-87
SftL-
(o/oo)
0
2
0
0
0
0
tri-Luc
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
(UMHO/CM)
660
2200
2600
650
950
HI FHTS1LH
HARDNESS
CaC03)
250
558
195
307
L/UtmLHL
ALKALINITY
CaCOS)
106
263
428
158
SHKH.
P"
(SU)
7.2
7.7
8.8
8.3
7.6
7.4
ItKlblU.
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INt
IBS/LI
(0.1
(0.1
1.3
1.5
5
UNION-
IZED
(MG/L)
(0.1
>3.6
(0.1
0.5
MINI-
MUM
DO
(HG/L
SAT.)
7.8
8
5.4
7.4
94*
1 NPDES 1
1 NN 0000159
2 NM 0020737
3 NM 0028100
4 * 0028355
5NN 0028827
6 NM 0028827
OUT-
FALL
t
008
001
001
050
001
001
FACILITY NAME
BENERAL ELECTRIC
GRANTS
GULF MINERAL RESOURCES
USDE-LOS ALAMOS NTL LAB
LAS VEGAS
LAS VEGAS
-I
!
!
1
1 TEST SPECIES
! D.
I D.
i D.
1 D.
! D.
! 0.
-!
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
U-l-LUtNl liniL
TEST LC50
LENGTH (HEFFLUEHT)
DAYS 24H
2
1 3
1
2 78
2 3
1 (6
48H CHRONIC
52
3
IT
MORTALITY
IN 100%
EFFLUENT
0
100
0
80
100
100
MORTALITY
IN 100)
DECHLOR-
INflTED
EFFLUENT
0
50
5
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NCEC
COWtNl 5
NOTES: CI=95X CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
MO MORT. ; VARIABLE DISCHARGE; STORMUATER/COOLIN6
CI: 2-5 (24H)
CI: 65-93 (24H); 39-70 (4BH)
CI: NOT CALCULABLE; NOTE TOX. IN DECHL TEST
NOTE HIGH NH3 (TOT. NH3~36 MB/L)
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
-------
1
I
t NPDE8I
1 OK 0000159
2 OX 0000159
3 OX 0000191
4 OK 0000191
5 OX 0000191
6 OK 0000256
7 OK 0000256
80X0000256
90X0000272
10 OK 0000931
11 OK 0000531
12 OK 0000744
13 0X0000744
14 OK 0000795
! 150X0000795
i
IHLlLllT/HtLtmHB KHItH IWUKWIlUn
OUT-
Cfil 1
PHLL
1
003
003
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
MCDONNELL-DOUGLAS
NCDONNELL-DOUBLAS
SEBUOYBH FUEL
SEQUOYAHFUEL
SEOUOYAH FUEL
CONOCO
CONOCO
CONOCO
PRYOR IND. CONSERV.
ALLIED MATERIALS
ALLIED MATERIALS
UEYERHAUSER
UEYERHAUSER
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
OfP
SIC
COPE
3*71
3471
2819
2819
2819
2911
2911
2911
CORP. 4953
2911
2911
2621
2621
2016
2016
i nraTtnu
LULHIlUN
(CITY)
TULSA
TULSA
BORE
SORE
GORE
PONCACITY
PONCACITY
PONCACITY
PRYOR
STROUD
STROUD
VALLIANT
VM1IANT
NORMAN
NORMAN
RECEIVING HATER NAME
TRIB. TO HINGO CREEK
TRIB. TO HINGO CREEK
ILLINOIS RIVER
ILLINOIS RIVER
ILLINOIS RIVER
OKAHA CREEK
OMAHA CREEK
OMAHA CREEK
GRAND NEOSHO RIVER
SALT CREEK
SALT CREEK
GARLAND CREEK
GARLAND CREEK
LITTLE RIVER
LITTLE RIVER
STREW FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) ((CD)
MEAN 70.10 MEAN MAX.
16.14 0.11 0.75 9.02
16.14 0.11 0.75 9.02
1537 75.78 2.16 2.89
1537 75.78 2.16 2.69
1537 75.78 2.16 2.89
1234 0
1234 0
1234 0
2971 146.54 1.79 3.5
7.3 0.01 0.06 0.5
7.3 0.01 0.06 0.5
0 18.46 29.7
0 18.46 29.7
1851 1.77 0.68 0.98
1851 1.77 0.68 0.98
(*)
91.36
91.36
4.23
4.23
4.23
100
100
100
1.86
90.29
90.29
100
100
37.32
37.32
SAMPLE
rra i crTFni
LULLED lUn
DATE
09-Jul-64
04-Dec-B5
ll-Auj-87
ll-flug-87
ll-Aug-87
30-Apr-85
30-Apr-85
l«./urtmL«_ uwKHLitKlbiitb
SAL-
TUT TV
mi IT
(0/00)
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
SPECIFIC
come-
TQfJTC
IHNLC
(UKHO/CM)
1300
1650
220
220
220
2200
. 350
3900
500
490
490
3000
3000
1000
1000
HARDNESS
f MC/1 no
tlxJ/L rO
CaC03)
628
649
92
92
92
320
88
492
104
175
175
36
36
ALKALINITY
/up /i Ap _ii
IRb/L Ho
CaC03)
64
31
54
54
54
125
48
74
138
113
113
229
229
f
(SU)
7.3
5.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.6
7.6
7
7.5
8.5
8.5
8.6
8.6
7.3
7.3
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
THC
IWt
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
(W3/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.6
0.6
2.2
2.2
i
MINI-
MUM
DO
MG/L)
no 4
Un %
SAT.)
3.2
6.8
93*
8.2
6.2
8.5
82*
8.2
92*
98*
55*
80*
6.6
i
OUT-
cat i
rlU.
1 NPOESI 1 FACILITY NAME
1 OX 0000159 003 MCDONNELL-DOUGLAS
2 OX 0000159 003 NCDONNEa-DOU6LAS
3 OX 0000191 001 SEDUOYAH FUEL
4 OK 0000191 001 SEQUOYRH FUEL
5 OX 0000191 001 SEOUOYAH FUEL
6 OK 0000256 002 CONOCO
7 OX 0000256 001 CONOCO
8 OX 0000256 001 CONOCO
9 OK 0000272 001 PRYOR IW). CONSERV. CORP.
10 OX 0000531 001 ALLIED MATERIALS
11 OK 0000531 001 ALLIED MATERIALS
12 OK 0000744 001 UEYERHAUSER
13 OK 0000744 001 UEYERHAUSER
14 OK 0000795 001 TYSON FOODS
! 15 OK 0000795 001 TYSON FOODS
!
fcM-LULNI IUXIC1IT
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY OECHLOR- EFFLUENT
W TM t(VW lUrtTCTl
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. pan i o
D. PULEX 1 0 0
P. PRONEU8 8 15
KLENASTRUN 4 36 69 12 6
0. PULEI 2 5
D. PULEX 1 10 20
D. PULEI 1 10 0
D. PULED 2 62 100
D. PULEX 1 0 0
P. PRONELAS 8 100 50 45
D. PULEI 2 00
P. PRONELAS 8 47 100 100 50
D. PULEI 2 79 70
NICROTOI MOO
D. PULEX 1 68 100
CQMENT5
NOTE: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
INITIAL DO 3.2 MG/L; AERATION STARTED
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
ChV=8.5*
-
-
-
CI:50-79
-
PRIORITY POLL. DATA AVAIL.; KORT. IN DECHL. EFFL.
PRIORITY POLLUTANT DATA AVAILABLE
CI:35-67| ChV=71X
-
NO EFFECT (15 AND 30 MIN.)
CI:64-73; NOTE HIGH NH3
POTENTIAL
FDR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
-J
I
-------
i
1
1
{
1
1
: wrest
! 16 OK 0000799
1 17 OX 0000793
1 16 0X0000793
! 190X0000609
1 20 OK0000609
! 21 OX 0000609
i 22 0X0000609
1 23 OK 0000609
i 24 OK 0000609
! 25 OK 0000809
I 26 OK 0000623
1 27 0X0000623
I 28 OK 0001031
! 29 OK 0001031
! 30 OK 0001031
i
OUT-
en i
FILL
1
001
001
001
001
004
»
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
USflF-TINKER AFB
UBAF-T1NKER AFB
USAF-TINKER AFB
USAF-TINKER AFB
USflF-TINKER AFB
USflF-TINKER AFB
USAF-TINKER AFB
KERR-MCBEE
KERRHteGEE
VISTA POLYMERS
VISTA POLYMERS
VISTA POLYMERS
CTP
DlL
CODE
£016
£016
£016
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
2911
2911
2621
2821
£821
-THLlLllT/nCLClVJND NNICn 1ITUIW1I iUTT
1 flTfiTTnu
UJbHIlUN
(CITY) RECEIVING UflTER NAME
NORMAN LITTLE RIVER
NORMAN LITTLE RIVER
NORMAN LITTLE RIVER
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY CRUTCH) CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
UYNNEUODD TURKEY SANDY CR.
WYNNEWOOD TURKEY SANDY CR.
OKLAHOMA CITY CRUTCH) CREEK
OKLAHOMA CITY CRUTCH) CREEK
OKLAHOMA CITY CRUTCH) CREEK
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
PIPE FLOW
(NED)
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
1651 1.
1851 1.
1651 1.
37.2
834.2
834.2
37.18
37.18
37.18
77 0.68 0.98
77 0.68 0.98
77 0.68 0.98
0 0.58 1.07
00.075
0
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.56 1.07
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.67 0.95
0 0.67 0.95
0 0.5652.43
0 0.58 52.43
0 0.58 52.43
TUT
1m.
(*)
37.32
37.32
37.32
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
SAMPLE
rn t rrrtflu
LULLtLllW
DATE
19Htov-B6
23-Feb-88
23-Feb-8B
29-Oct-84
29-Oct-84
29-Oct-84
30-Jul-86
30-Jul-86
17-Aug-87
17-Aug-87
27-Mar-64
14-Nar-BB
10-Feb-88
10-Feb-BS
10-Feb-88
crriucnt KniaiiHL/LncniLM.
SAL-
TMFTV
ini IT
(o/oo)
1
0
0
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TflWTC
IHTtUt
(UHHD/CM)
1000
1000
1000
1800
400
500
1100
1100
1300
1300
1380
1800
900
900
900
HARDNESS
/HP /I fiG
inb/L HD
CaC03)
36
874
168
170
556
556
480
480
276
LHHIWLICKiai 1UJ
ALKALINITY
/MR /I OC "
lng/L HS
CaC03)
229
113
178
182
89
89
SB
58
10
V"
(SU)
7.3
7.3
7.5
7.2
7.5
7.9
7.2
7.2
7
7
7.1
7.4
8
8
8
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
TIJC
int.
(MG/L)
(0.1
3.5
3.5
)3.0
)3.0
3.5
3.5
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
uu?
nru
(MG/L)
2.2
0.1
0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
ME/L)
m*
»
SAT.)
68*
93*
89*
8.5
6.8
8
90*
8.4
7.9
92*
6.4
96*
96*
99*
i
I
!
OUT-
rot i
rHLL
NPOES t 1 FACILITY NAME
16 OK 0000799 001 TYSON FOODS
17 OK 0000795 001 TYSON FOODS
18 OK 0000795 001 TYSON FOODS
19 OK 0000809 001 USflF-TINKER AFB
20 OK 0000609 004 USflF-T INKER AFB
21 OX 0000609 * USAF-TINKER AFB
22 OK 0000809 001 USflF-TINKER AFB
23 OX 0000609 001 UBAF-TINKER AFB
24 OK 0000609 001 USflF-TINKER AFB
25 OK 0000609 001 USAF-TINKER AFB
26 0X0000625 KERRHCGEE
27 OX 0000623 001 KERR-McGEE
28 OK 0001031 001 VISTA POLYMERS
t 29 OK 0001031 001 VISTA POLYMERS
! 30 OK 0001031 001 VISTA POLYMERS
LfrLUtm IIM1L1IT
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LCSO MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
W. ..... . ... FU IfWW ThlflTCn »
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 4BH CHRONIC EFRUENT EFRUENT LOEC NOEC
P. PROMELAS 8 4 100 10 1
P. PROMELAS 7 14 100 100 25 12
D. PULEX 2 (6 100 0
D. PULEX 2 19 19 100 80
D. PULEX 1 0
D. PULEX 1 0
P. PROMELAS 7 37 75 10 50 25
0. PULEX 2 32 90 0
D. PULEX 2 (6 (6 100 30
P. PROHELAS 8 30 100 25 50 25
D. PULEX 1 0
D. PULEX 2 5
SELENflSTRUM 4 0
P. PROMELAS 8 10
D. PULEX 1 0
. . ......
UJWtN 1 5
NOTE: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
CI:3-6; ChV-3.2; NOTE HIGH HO
ChV=17*i HIGHLY TOXIC; SIS. MORT. IN DECHL EFFL.
HIGHLY TOXIC: 100* MORT IN 6-10W EFR.
CI: 12-25 (24 t 48H); PROBIT; EPA/OURB STUDY
SEE EPA/OURB SPECIAL STUDY REPORT
UNPERN. DISCH. (LOWWATER DAM); SEE EPA/OURB STUDY
ChV=35*
CI: 28-38; MORTALITY DATA IS FOR 50* EFRUENT
NOTE HIGH CHLORINE
ChV*35*
-
-
STIHULflTORY IN 50 * AND 100* EFFL.
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTQt/MJ
EFFtcrs
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
oo
-------
1
NPKSI
31 OK 0001261
32 OK 0001261
33 OK 0001261
34 OK 0001295
35 OK 0001309
36 OX 002102*
37 OK 0022616
360X0022616
39 0X0022624
40 OK 0022861
41 OK 0026000
42 OK 0026221
I 43 OK 0026221
4* OK 0026701
! 45 OK 0026701
IMLlLllI/lgLCIYlKO WHICH IWUMJWI JUV-
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NMC
001 EA6LE-PIDO INDUGTRIES
001 EAGU-PIOCR INDUSTRIES
001 EAGLE-PIOER 1NXJSTRIES
001 TOTflL PETROLEUM
003 SINCLAIR OIL
001 FARMLAND INDUSTRIES
001 6UYMN-SUIFT PLANT
001 6UYMW-SHIFT PLANT
eUYNON-WRTH PLANT
HARTSHORN
001 BflPULA
002 TULSfl NORTKSIDE
002 TULSfl NORTH5IDE
001 CUSHINB-SOUTH STP
001 CUSHINB-SOUTH STP
SIC
OK
3339
3339
3339
2911
2911
2B73
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
LOCATION
(CITY)
BMW
OUflPAU
QUAPAU
AROWRE
TULSfl
ENID
eUYMN
6UYNON
6UVMM
HARTSHORN
SAPULA
TULSfl
TULSfl
CUSHINB
CUSHINB
RECEIVING UATER NAME
SPRINB RIVER
SPRING RIVER
SPRINB RIVER
SAND CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
SKELETON CREEK
BEAVER RIVER
BEAVER RIVER
BEAVER RIVER
BRUSHY CREEK
ROCK CREEK
BIRD CREEK
BIRD CREEK
COTTONUDOO CREEK
corroNuooD CREEK
STREAN FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
(CAN 7010
2058 235.4
2058 235.4
2058 235.4
168.1 0
2720 619
42.4 3.31
34.59 0
34.59 0
24.95 0
130 76
39.8 0.698
16.14 0.11
16.14 0.11
1240 0
1240 0
PIPE aw
(MGD)
(CAN MAX.
0.9326.14
0.9326.14
0.9326.14
0.088 0.151
1.03
0.98 1.42
1.05 1.09
1.05 1.09
0.53 0.65
0.17 1.1
1.44
6 30
6 30
0.98 2.09
0.98 2.09
IMC
(*>
0.61
0.61
0.61
100
0.26
30.8
100
100
100
0.35
76.18
98.63
98.83
100
100
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DflTE
09-Jun-87
09-JUB-87
09-Jun-87
06-Aug-86
£3-Jul-84
03-Jun-66
27-Ort-B7
27-Oct-87
17-Oct-85
26-«ai-e5
23-Sep-85
26-Mar-85
26-*ar-65
20-Jun-8B
20-Jun-88
tl-l-LUtNl HHVblUL/UUUCIf. CHHRflCTERISTICS
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TflNCE
(UNO/CM)
180
180
180
5250
1100
5000
750
750
1300
550
600
700
700
700
700
HARDNESS
(K8/L AS
CaC03)
126
126
126
208
256
1122
271
108
130
218
218
83
83
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03>
SB
58
58
212
40
92
398
62
85
203
203
166
166
pH
DAYS 24H 4BH CHRONIC EFaUENT
2 (6
4
8
1
1
7
4
8
1
1
1
1
2
2
8
(6 100
(3 99
10.5 100
45
0
0
53 %
64 70
5
0
0
100
88 100
30
15
MORTALITY
IN 100«
DECHLOH-
T WDTFn
IPiH 1 LL/
EFFLUENT
0
49
5
0
0
0
0
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NCEC
(3 (3
12 6
SO 25
100 50
tOWENJS
NOTE: CI*95X CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChV=CHRQNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
NOTE EXTREMELY HIGH CHLORINE
ChV(3*; NOTE EXTREMELY HIGH CHLORINE
ChV=8.5*; NOTE EXTREMELY HIGH CHLORINE
-
-
-
CHV-35*
CI:50-87j ChV=71X
-
-
-
LCSO NOT CALCULATED; HORT. OCCURRED AFTER 2.5H
-
-
NO SIG. EFFECT
1
POTENTIAL
FOR
TMQT
OfflM
llulncrwi
EFFECTS
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
CHRONIC
VD
I
-------
-- - ---- i.-. -.,.-.-- ---rm.iLiiT/ncLCiVinu HHicn iKrimrnriUTf"""- "---- -- ---- - -
* NPDESI
46 OK 0026841
47 OK 0026841
48 OK 0026841
49 OK 0026841
50 DK 0026859
51 OK 0026859
52 OK 0027553
53 OK 0027553
54 OK 0027553
55 OK 0027931
56 OK 0027931
57 OK 0028134
58 OK 0029131
59 OK 0029131
60 OK 0030295
OUT-
FALL
I
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
MIDUEST CITY NDRTHSIDE
MIDUEST CITY NORTHSIDE
MIDUEST CITY NORTHSIDE
MIDUEST CITY NORTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY SOUTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY SOUTHSIDE
OKLA. CITY-CHISHOLM CRK
OKLA. CITY-CHISHOLM CRK
OKLA. CITY-CHISHOLM CRK
MOORE
MOORE
OKMUL6EE
MUSKOGEE
MUSKOGEE
USA-FORT SILL
SIC
CODE
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
9711
LOCATION
(CITY) RECEIVING HATER NAME
MIDUEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
MIDUEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
MIDUEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
MIDUEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
OKLAHOMA CITY CHISHOLM CREEK
OKLAHOMA CITY CHISHOLM CREEK
OKLAHOMA CITY CHISHOLM CREEK
MOORE LITTLE RIVER
MOORE LITTLE RIVER
OKMUL6EE CANADIAN R., DEEP FORK
MUSKOGEE ARKANSAS RIVER
NUSK06EE ARKANSAS RIVER
FORT SILL E. CACHE CREEK
STREAM PLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7QIO
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
8.44 0
8.44 0
238 14.17
21762 21%
21762 2196
49.95 0
PIPE FLOU
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
5.59 6.28
5.59 6.28
5.59 6.28
5.59 6.28
1.6
1.6
4.66 11.3
4.66 11.3
4.66 11.3
4.22 11.09
4.22 11.09
2.17 4.47
6.21 9.1
6.21 9.1
2. 14 4. 1
IMC
(*)
56.02
56.02
56.03
56.03
26.72
26.72
100
100
19.19
0.64
0.64
100
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
OB-Apr-85
OB-Apr-85
12-Apr-B8
12-Apr-88
08-Apr-e5
OB-Apr-65
09-feb-88
09-feb-68
09-Feb-88
17-Aug-87
17-Aug-fl7
2
-------
.
* NPDESI
61 OK 0030295
62 OK 0030295
630X0030295
64 OK 0030295
65 OK 0030295
66 OK 0030333
67 OK 0034568
68 OK 0035246
69 OK 0035246
70 OK 0035246
71 OK 0036978
72 OK 0036978
73 OK 0036978
t-H.Jl.llT/KtltmNU WHItN 1IW-UIWHIJUH
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USA-FORT SIU
USA-FORT SIU
USA-FORT SIU
USA-FORT SIU
USA-FORT SIU
BARTLESVIUE
OK ORDINANCE WORKS AUTH.
LAHTON
LAUTON
LAUTON
OKLA. CITY-N. CANADIAN
OKLA. CITY-N. CANADIAN
OKLA. CITY-N. CANADIAN
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING UATER NAME
9711 FORT SIU E. CACHE CREEK
9711 FORT SIU E. CACHE CREEK
9711 FORT SIU E. CACHE CREEK
9711 FORT SIU E. CACHE CREEK
9711 FORT EIU E. CACHE CREEK
4952 BARTLESVILLE CANEY RIVER
4953 CHATEAU CHATEAU CREEK
4952 LAUTON E. CACHE CREEK
4952 LAUTON E. CACHE CREEK
4952 LAUTON E. CACHE CREEK
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY NORTH CANADIAN RIVER
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY NORTH CANADIAN RIVER
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY NORTH CANADIAN RIVER
STREAM FLOW
(CF5)
(TENTATIVE)
PIPE ROW
(MGD)
MEAN 7010 CAN MAX.
49.95
49.95
49.95
49.95
49.95
860 1.
0 2.14 4.
0 2.14 4.
0 2.14 4.
0 2.14 4.
0 2.14 4.
55 7.21 30
54.7 0.72 1.92 6
148.4 1.
148.4 1.
148.4 1.
38 14.95 21.87
38 14.95 21.87
38 14.95 21. 87
54.44 89.55
54.44 89.55
54.44 89.55
IHC
(*)
100
100
100
100
100
87.82
BO. 52
94. 38
94.4
94.4
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
22-May-fl6
04-Dec-66
04-Dec-B6
29-«ar-B8
29-t!ar-B8
29-Apr-86
02-Apr-85
19-Sep-84
29-Mar-B8
29-Mar-88
29-Apr-66
29-Apr-66
09-Nay-flfl
u-fLUtni HntMLHL/utmLHL
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
800
1000
1000
600
600
750
900
800
800
BOO
1100
1100
1000
HARDNESS
IHG/L AS
CaCtB)
198
203
203
215
215
222
128
124
227
227
204
204
240
UWKW. 1 tKlb 1 1LS
ALKALINITY
(M6/L AS
CaC03)
98
91
91
105
105
130
122
182
175
175
177
177
260
PH
-------
1'
I KPKSI
1 TX 0000132
2 TX 0000132
3 TX 0000353
4 n 0000353
5 TX 0000333
6 TX 0000333
7 TX 0000333
8 TX 0000540
9 TX 0000671
10 TX 0000710
11 TX 0000692
12 TX 0000692
13 TX 0000692
14 TI 0000692
15 TX 0000692
!
OUT-
CM 1
FULL
1
003
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USA-RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT
USA-RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
S.W. ELECTRIC POWER CO.
USAFHCLLY AFB
AMERICAN MDRIT
BELL HELICOPTER
BELL HELICOPTER
BELL HELICOPTER
BELL HELICOPTER
BELL HELICOPTER
Off*
SIC
CODE
3471
3471
3721
3721
3721
3721
3721
4911
3471
2619
3721
3721
3721
3721
3721
i nraTTM
LUuRIIUN
(CITY)
TEXARKANA
TEXARKANA
FORT WORTH
FORT WORTH
FORT WORTH
FORT NORTH
FORT NORTH
LONBVIEH
SAN ANTONIO
MARSHALL
HURST
HURST
HURST
HURST
HURST
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE ROW
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
RECEIVING HATER NAME MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
PANTHER CRREK 0 0 0.49 1.09
E. FORK ELLIOTT CREEK 0 0 0.56 1.94
LAKE NORTH 1.32 3.61
LAKE NORTH - 1.32 3.61
LAKE WORTH 1.32 3.61
LAKE WORTH 1.32 3.61
LAKE NORTH 1.32 3.61
LAKE CHEROKEE 1960 6.8 216 469
LEON CREEK 84 3 1.38 3.87
POTTERS CREEK 51 3.89 0.86 2.18
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R. 1230 4.550.0730.617
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R. 1230 4.55 0.073 0.617
TRIB./H. FK. TRINITY R. 1230 4.550.0730.617
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R. 1230 4.55 0.073 0.617
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R. 1230 4.550.0730.617
TUT
1WU
(*)
100
100
16
16
16
16
16
16
41.62
25.52
2.42
2.42
2.42
2.42
2.42
SAMPLE
rni i CTTtnu
LULLC.L 1 1 Iff
DATE
21-flug-B4
24-Jun-B6
lO-Sep-86
10-Sep-86
13-Jul-87
13-Jul-87
13-Jul-87
23-Jarr-fl6
10-Jul-85
10-Sep-86
ll-Aug-86
18-flug-B6
18-Aug-86
13-Jul-87
13-Jul-87
'Lrrmcni rnTaiut-fLrcmLt*.
SAL-
1UTTV
INI IT
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TfltdPC
IHNLt
(UMHO/CM)
550
350
500
500
400
400
400
375
1450
8000
200
240
240
230
230
HARDNESS
fMC/l OC
Iflo/L Ha
CaC03)
84
90
142
142
132
132
132
132
130
100
87
87
86
66
wwH«,iEHi3iji.b
ALKALINITY
fMC/l AC u
(Mi/L Ha
CaC03)
126
30
92
92
79
79
79
87
80
59
41
41
41
41
F1
(SU)
7.1
6.6
8.4
6.4
6.3
8.3
8.3
7.9
7.4
6
7.8
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
1UIT
INt
(MG/L)
2.1
1.5
1.5
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.9
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
(MG/L)
(0.1
0.3
0.3
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
1.4
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
1
MINI- :
HUM !
DO :
(MG/L
no 4
UK *
SAT.)
0.1
66*
8.4
6
89*
6.7
6.1
81*
8.2
6.4
92* !
8 !
91* I
i
j
!
:
OUT-
Ptt I
rtv_L
1 KPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
1 TX 0000132 003 USA-RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT
2 TX 0000132 001 USA-RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT
3 TX 0000353 001 GENERAL DYNAMICS
4 TX 0000353 001 GENERAL DYNAMICS
5 n 0000353 001 GENERAL DYNAMICS
6 TX 0000353 001 GENERAL DYNAMICS
7 TX 0000353 001 GENERAL DYNAMICS
6 TX 0000540 001 S.U. ELECTRIC POWER CO.
9 TX 0000671 001 USAF-KELLY AFB
10 TX 0000710 001 AMERICAN WRIT
11 TX 0000892 001 BELL HELICOPTER
12 n 0000892 001 BELL HELICOPTER
13 TX 0000892 001 BELL HELICOPTER
14 n 0000692 001 BELL HELICOPTER
15 TX 0000892 001 BELL HELICOPTER
IhPLUtNI 10I1CITY
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFRUENT
TU _... ._ TU i/yw Twrnrn > .....
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFRUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEX 1 0
P. PROMELAS 7 30 90 0 50 25
P. PROMELAS 7 21 100 40 25 10
D. PULEX 233 100 0
SELENASTRUM 4 35 50 25
D. PULEX 2 0
P. PROMELAS 8 10
D. PULEX 1 0 0
D. PULEX 1 0 0
C, VARIE6ATUS 7 10
D. PULE J 263 100
D. PULEX 2 25 12 100
P. PROMELAS 7 55 50 25
D. PULEX 2 3 (1 100
P. PRONELAS 8 31 100 50 25
CDKNTS
NOTES: CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
OiVOiRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
LOU DO IN 100* EFR.{ AERATED
IMPORTANT NOTE: MORT. DATA FOR SOX EFFL.| ChV-35*
MORT. DATA FOR 50* EFR. ; CI (LCSO) : 14-33) ChV=16>
-
ChV°35*
-
NO SIB. EFFECT
-
-
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
CI:4-B(24H)
CI: 19-33(248); 8-17(48H); SEE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
IMPORTANT NOTE: MORT. DATA FOR 50* EFR.; ChV-35*
CI:NOT CALCULABLE; NOTE HIGH TOXICITY
ChV=35*
POTENTIAL
FDR
I klCTDCHH
INaTKcW
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
VIS CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
HD CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
I
Ul
-------
I
1 NPDESI
16 TX 0000892
17 TX 0000949
IB TX 0001007
19 TX 0001201
20 TX 0001465
21 n 0001465
22 TX 0002844
23 n 0002933
24 TX 0002968
25 TX 0003522
26 TX 0003522
27 TX 0003654
28 TX 0003697
29 H 0003873
30 TX 0003891
rhbJLl iT/ncuciviw NHICR inrunrnuun
OUT-
FALL
1
001
003
002
003
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
BELL HELICOPTER
TEXAS EASTMAN
TUGCO
TEMPLE-EASTEX
TYLER PIPE, INC.
TYLER PIPE, INC.
UNION CARBIDE
DOW CHEMICAL CO.
FIRESTONE RUBBED
AMOCO OIL CO.
AMOCO OIL CO.
POLYSAR GULF COAST
MARATHON OIL CO.
MONSANTO
TEMPLE-EASTEX
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY)
3721 HURST
2869LON8VIEH
4911 DALLAS
2661 OIBDLL
3321 SHAN
3321 SHAN
2869SEADRIFT
2B69LAPORTE
2822 ORANGE
2911 TEXAS CITY
2911 TEXAS CITY
2822 ORANGE
2911 TEXAS CITY
2869 ALVIN
2621 SILSBEE
RECEIVING HATER NAME
TRIB.AI. FK. TRINITY R.
SABINE RIVER
MOUNTAIN CREEK LAKE
NECHES RIVER
LITTLE SALINE CREEK
LITTLE SALINE CREEK
VICTORIA BARGE CANAL
SAN JACINTO BAY
COM BAYOU
LOWER GALVESTON BAY
LOWER BALVESTON BAY
COU BAYOU
STREAM ROM
(CFS) PIPE ROH
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
1230 4.55 0.073 0.617
932 70.01 4.26 7.81
0.81 2.35
1573 5.62 1.41 4.9
32.68 2.5 0.269 0.733
32.68 2.50.2920.749
4.67 13.68
1.1 1.83
8.63 0.042 0.8
13 20.7
13 20.7
8.63 0.42 1.64 7.13
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL 1.3 2.03
CHOCOLATE BAYOU
NECHES RIVER
394 1.18 4.12 9.41
3823 995.4 50.44 63.33
IUC
m
2.42
8.62
16
28
14.29
15.33
8
8
96.72
8
8
98.38
8
84.4
7.28
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
13-Jul-87
23-Sep-86
17-Sep-66
07-Apr-86
12-Jun-84
ie-Jun-84
08-Dec-B6
03-Jul-M
15-Oct-84
10-Aug-87
lO-flug-87
06-Nov-B4
15-Jul-86
23-Jan-85
22-Oct-86
crrmcni KtuaiuiL/uiemu*.
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
6
0
0
0
0
28
1
4
4
0
2
0
1
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UWHO/CN)
230
400
2600
790
800
42000
1900
2400
2400
1300
1700
1500
2400
HARDNESS
(H6/L AS
CaC03)
86
120
52
102
64
42
264
264
44
290
124
171
UWKHUCK13IJL9
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
41
63
224
81
67
413
68
171
171
132
80
170
212
PH
(SU)
7.6
9
7.9
6.7
8.5
7.7
8
7.5
7.8
7.8
7.3
7
8.2
7.5
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(NG/L)
(0.1
0.9
(0.1
(0.1
2.1
2.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR X
SAT.)
921
8
7.2
8.2
7.8
5.4
8
891
7.7
7.5
8.2
5.9
7.8
OUT-
CM 1
rtU.
» KPDES 1 I FACILITY NAME
16 TX 0000892 001 BELL HELICOPTER
17 TX 0000949 003 TEXAS EASTMAN
IB TX 0001007 002 TUGCO
19 TX 0001201 003 TEMPLE-EASTEX
20 TX 0001465 001 TYLER PIPE, INC.
21 TX 0001463 002 TYLER PIPE, INC.
22 TX 0002844 001 UNION CARBIDE
23 TX 0002933 001 DDK CHEMICAL CO.
24 TX 0002968 001 FIRESTONE RUBBER
25 n 0003522 001 AMOCO OIL CO.
26 TX 0003522 001 AMOCO OIL CO.
27 n 0003654 001 POLYSAR GULF COAST
28 TX 0003697 001 MARATHON OIL CO.
29 n 0003873 001 MONSANTO
30 TX 0003891 001 TEMPLE-EASTEX
i
1
:
i
!
I
»
1
! TEST SPECIES
I SELENASTRUN
t C. VARIEBATUS
! D. PULEX
1 D. PULEX
! D. PULEX
! 0. PULEX
! A. PUNCTULATA
i M. BAHIA
! D. PULEX
! P. PRONELPS
! D. PULEX
! D. PULEX
! D. PULEX
! D. PULEX
! D. PULEX
!
TEST
LENGTH
|||
IB
DAYS <
4
8
1
1
1
1
l.SH
2
1
8
2
1
2
1
1
B-l-LUtNT IW1C1TT
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
LC50 MORTALITY OECHLOR- EFFLUENT
Wl iVW T WATFn - - !
>4H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFRUENT LDEC NOEC
28 96 25 12
15
5
0
0
0
MO
75 75 100
0
20 100 a 12
65 36 100
0
3B 25 100 100
76 90 0
0
CDKOTS
NOTES: CI«9» CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChVCHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
ChV=17)l
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT; NOTE HIGH SALINITY
-
EFFL. TESTED 40H AFTER COLLECTION
SPECIAL EPA/THC STUDY-SEE REPORT
SPECIAL EPA/THC STUDY SEE REPORT
SALTS ADDED) PORT OF EPA SPECIAL STUDY
-
-
Ch 16-24; ChV=17<; SAL. CNTRL NOT RUN; HIGH NK3
CI: 30-43; HIGH NH3; HURT. IN SALINITY CONTROL
-
CI:3S-42(24H>; 19-32I48H)
-
-
i .
1
POTENTIAL
FDR
TUCTOCflftf
inblKLrvl
EFFECTS
M) CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
tO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
I
Ul
LO
-------
1
I
J
;
!
! 1 NPOESI
! 31 TX 0003891
! 32 n 0003891
! 33 TX 0003891
! 34 TX 0003891
! 35 TX 0004201
! 36 n 0004669
! 37 TX 0004669
! 38 TX 0004715
! 39 TX 0004715
! 40 TX 0004821
! 41 TX 0004855
! 42 TI 0004853
! 43 n 0004871
! 44 TX 0004871
! 45 TX 0004898
!
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
003
001
001
004
006
001
002
002
007
007
001
FACILITY NAME
TEMPLE-EASTEX
TEMPLE-EASTEX
TEMPLE-EASTEX
TEMPLE-ASTEI
AMERICAN PETROFINA
DUPONT
DUPONT
ALCOA
ALCOA
AMOCO CHEMICAL CO.
TW.ILI lT/nctCivinu Miicn iwunmi jun-
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING WATER NAME
2621 SILSBEE NECHES RIVER
2621 SILSBEE NECHES RIVER
2621 SILSBEE NECHES RIVER
2621 SILSBEE NECHES RIVER
2911 GROVES NECHES RIVER
2869 BEAUMONT NECHES RIVER
2B69 BEAUMONT NECHES RIVER
3334 POINT COMFORT LAVACA BAY
3334 POINT COMFORT LAVACA BAY
2B21 ALVIN CHOCOLATE BAYOU
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7D10
3823 995.4
3823 995.4
3823 995.4
3823 995.4
3823 1060.5
3823 1060.5
3823 1060.5
30.71 1.89
EOF CHEM.I METALLURGICAL 3339 TEXAS CITY UPPER GALVESTON BAY
GULF WEN.I METALLURGICAL 3339 TEXAS CITY UPPER GALVESTON BAY
SHELL OIL CO.
SHELL OIL CO.
CAMERON IRONWORKS
2911 DEER PARK HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
2911 DEER PARK HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
3312 BUFFALO BAYOU KATY
275.5 22.65
PIPE FLOW
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
50.4463.33
50.44 63.33
50.4463.33
50.44 63.33
1.191 2.94
7 21.9
7 21.9
3.65 6.99
1.05 5
4.65 7.6
0.15 1.5
0.15 1.5
5.75 8.6
5.73 8.6
0.28 3.49
SAMPLE
IMC COLLECTION
(*) DATE
7.28 22-Oct-65
7.28 22-Oct-86
7.28 26-Jarrfi8
7.28 26-Jan-8B
0.28 31-Jan-ti5
1.01 29-Apr-87
1.01 29-Apr-fl7
12 15-Jan-85
12 15-J»n-B5
79.23 24-Jul-86
8 19-Aug-86
8 19-flug-86
30 30-Jul-86
30 30-Jul-B6
100 06-Aug-B5
crrujeni rmaiuHL/ircmtHL tmKHLitmsilL'j
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
1
1
0
0
0
3
5
23
1
2
4
4
2
2
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
2400
2400
1600
1600
2250
2900
2900
28000
800
2100
4000
4000
2900
2900
BOO
HARDNESS
(KG/I AS
CaC03)
171
171
110
JBOO
73
228
1625
1685
282
262
78
ALKALINITY
(M6/L AS
CaC03)
212
212
47
110
104
81
33
33
255
255
278
PH
(SU)
7.6
7.6
7.5
7.3
6.6
7.9
7.9
8.2
6.9
8.2
7.9
7.9
8.1
8.1
8.1
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(M6/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
0.4
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR *
SAT.)
61*
79*
6.4
92*
91*
6.6
8.4
91*
91*
8.4
87*
6.3
6.7
1
1
1
1
OUT- !
cat i i
rw^ i
I NPOESI 1 FACILITY NAME !
31 TX 0003891 001 TEMPLE-EASTEX 1
32 TX 0003891 001 TEMPLE-EASTEX 1
33 TX 0003891 001 TEMPLE-EASTEX !
34 TI 0003891 001 TEMPLE-tASTEX 1
35 TX 0004201 003 AMERICAN PETROFINA !
36 TI 0004669 001 DUPONT !
37 TX 0004669 001 DUPONT I
38 TI 0004715 004 ALCOA !
39 TX 0004715 006 ALCOA i
40 n 0004821 001 AMOCO CHEMICAL CO. I
41 TX 0004855 002 GULF CHEM.I METALLURGICAL 1
42 TX 0004855 002 GULF CHEM.I METALLURGICAL!
43 TX 0004871 007 SHELL OIL CO. 1
44 TI 0004871 007 SHELL OIL CO. !
43 TX 0004898 001 CAMERON IRON IOKS !
TEST SPECIES
CERIODAPHNIA
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEX
BELENASTRUM
D. PULE X
C. VARIEGATUS
P. PROMELAS
N. BAHIA
D. PULEI
P. PROMELAS
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEI
P. PROWJB
D. PULEI
D. PULEI
1
TEST
LENGTH
DAYS 24H
B
7
2
4
1
8
8
1
1
7
7
2
7
1
1
FFLUENT luncnr
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
WIAAM TuflTtrn i
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
0
5
10
20
0 0
10
66 100 100 50
0
0
0
15
5
0
0
0 0
-COMMENTS
NOTES: CI«9S* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChVOHRDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO SIG. EFFECT
NO SIB. EFFECT
NO SIG. HORT.
STIMULATORY: 6-50* EFFL | NO SIG EFFECT IN 100*
CHEMISTRY OF PERMIT PARAMETERS AVAILABLE
NO SIG. EFFECT
ChV*71*| NO SIG. NORT. IN 5 0/00 SALINITY CONTROL
-
-
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
-
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
IhlCTDCflM
INSfncHM
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
!
I
1/1
-------
i " - . "' ' r MULiif/ntLcivinj mitn jwunmuun :
!
!
!
!
!
: KPDESI
! 46 TX 0009061
i 47 TX 0005096
i 48 TX 0005360
! 49 TX 0005635
i SO TX 0005633
i 51 TX 0005860
i 52 TX 0006025
! 53 TX 0006025
! 54 TX 0006025
1 55 TX 0006025
1 56 TX 0006023
.' 57 TX 0006025
i SB TX 0006025
I 59 TX 0006023
! 60 TX 0006033
i
OUT-
FALL
1
001
101
001
Oil
001
001
101
101
101
001
101
001
001
001
003
FACILITY NAME
GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER
KOPPERS CO., INC.
GCUDA-BAYPORT (CENTRAL)
STAR ENTERPRISES
STAR ENTERPRISES
CHEMICAL EXCHANGE
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
SOLTEX POLYMER CORP.
SIC
CODE
2822
2863
4953
2911
2911
2863
2869
2669
2669
2869
2669
2669
2869
2669
2821
LOCUTION
(CITY)
BEAUMONT
HOUSTON
BAYPORT
PORT ARTHUR
PORT ARTHUR
GALENA PARK
BISHOP
BISHOP
BISHOP
BISHOP
BISHOP
BISHOP
BISHOP
BISHOP
DEER PARK
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
RECEIVING HATER NAME MEAN 7010 (CAN MAX.
KIDD 6ULLY/DINN B. 146 0.8 1.92 2.31
BUFFALO BAYOU 855 37.3 0.014 0.061
BAYPORT CH./GALV. BAY 7.67 15
ALLI6ATOR B. /TAYLOR B. 626 3.1 8.6611.85
ALLIGATOR B. /TAYLOR B. 626 3.1 17.227.65
PANTHER CREEK TO HSC 855 2.21 0.026 0.066
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 1.02 0.41 0.67
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 1.02 0.41 0.67
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 .02 0.41 0.67
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 .02 0.41 0.67
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 .02 0.41 0.67
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 .02 0.41 0.67
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 .02 0.41 0.67
SAN FERNANDO CREEK 25.13 .02 0.41 0.67
PHILLIPS DITCH TO HSC 855 37.3
IMC
(t)
78.81
30
8
81.58
89.58
30
38.36
38.38
38.38
38.36
38.38
36.38
38.38
38.38
6
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
04-Feb-85
30-Jul-85
30-flpr-65
10-Dec-84
10-Oec-64
25-Jan-64
OB-Jan-85
02-Feb-87
02-F6&-87
02-Feb-87
02-Feb-87
21-Sep-87
21-Sep-87
21-Sep-B7
23-Jul-flS
U-l-UJtNl mTblt«./U1tfUU*. UWMHbltKISFJLS
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
2
4
0
1
2
2
3
3
3
I
1
1
1
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
900
2300
2200
2600
1800
3800
5000
5000
5000
5000
500
500
500
3200
HARDNESS
(NG/L AS
CaC03>
144
840
328
748
104
122
384
364
384
364
320
320
320
212
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
140
86
244
33
144
HOOO
167
167
167
167
117
117
117
126
PH
(SU)
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.5
8
6.4
6.4
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
8.3
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
MINI- i
MUM
DO
(NB/L
OR t
SAT.)
6.4
6.3
8.4
7
6.2
8.4
89%
81*
7.9
92*
8.6 1
!
1
!
!
!
!
1
: i
! 46
: 47
: 48
! 49
t 50
! 51
! 52
1 53
! 54
! 53
1 56
! 57
t SB
! 59
! 60
i
NPDES*
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
n
TX
0009061
0005096
0006360
0005635
0003835
0005660
0006025
0006023
0006025
0006025
0006025
0006023
0006023
0006025
0006033
OUT-
ftu i
*
001
101
001
on
001
001
101
101
101
001
101
001
001
001
003
'-- '- 1
!
!
!
FACILITY NAME
GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER
KOPPERS CO., INC.
GCUDA-BAVPORT (CENTRAL)
STAR ENTERPRISES
STAR ENTERPRISES
CHEMICAL EXCHANGE
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
TEST SPECIES
CER10DAPHMA
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D, PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
P. PRONELAS
A. PUNCTULATA
CELANESE CHEMICAL t SELENASTRUM
CELANESE CHEMICAL ! D. PULEX
CELANESE CHEMICAL ! P. PRONELAS
CELANESE CHEMICAL ! SELENASTRUM
SOLTEX POLYMER CORP. i D. PULEX
i
U-l-UJtNl IUIILIIT
TEST
LENGTH
tu
DAYS 24H
7
2 57
1
1
1
1
2 92
1 45
8
1.5H
4
2
8
4
1
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
LCSO MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
Wt/uw iiiQTrn - ^
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
0
41 100
0
0
0
0
59 95 100
60
15
HO
(6
0
10
37 75 25 12
5 0
LUWIIS 1
1
NOTES: CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO 1
1
!
1
! POTENTIAL 1
CMMXRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT (SURVIVAL/REPRODUCTION)
CIi 49-67 (24H); 33-51 (4BH)
NO HORT. IN DILUTIONS * SALINITY CONTROL
-
INCOMPLETE EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY
CI:50-70(48H)
Cl: 18-100) UPSTREAM UATER USED FOR DILUTION
UPSTREAM MATER USED FOR DILUTION
SALTS ADDED; PART OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
UPSTREAM MATER USED FOR DILUTION
-
NO SI6. EFFECT
O)V"17t
-
i
FOR
IUCT
!
ornH i
jnaf ncrwi »
EFFECTS !
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
CHRONIC !
ACUTE !
ACUTE !
ACUTE 1
ACUTE !
ACUTE !
ACUTE 1
ACUTE !
CHRONIC !
CHRONIC !
CHRONIC !
ACUTE !
CHRONIC !
CHRONIC !
ACUTE !
<
I
en
en
-------
;. . . -,...--. i ,.-.- -"-' t HLiLlll/ntLClVircU KMItn IPrUHmiiUH '" ""' ------" "----"-"---"- ..- -
NPOESI
61 n 0006033
62 TI 0006033
63 TI 0006068
64 TI 0006084
65 n 0006064
66 n 0006297
67 TX 0006297
68 H 0006327
69 TI 0006327
70 TI 0006327
71 TX 0006483
72 H 0007048
73 TX 0007048
74 TX 0007056
75 TX 0007056
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
202
202
202
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
SOLTEX POLYMER CORP.
SOLTEI POLYMER CORP.
ARCO POLYMERS
ROHM t HAAS
ROHM 1 HAAS
SIC LOCATION
OK (CITY)
2821 DEER PARK
2821 DEER PARK
2869 HOUSTON
2869 DEER PARK
2869 DEER PARK
NATL. DISTILLERS 1 DEN. 2821 PORT ARTHUR
NATL. DISTILLERS 1 DEN. 2821 PORT ARTHUR
DUPONT-SABINE RIVER
OUPONT-SABINE RIVER
DUPONT-SABIHt RIVER
DOW CHEMICAL
LUBRIZOL CORP.
LUBRIZOL CORP.
U.S. GYPSUM CO.
U.S. GYPSUM CO.
WORKS 2869 ORANGE
UORKS 2869 ORANGE
WORKS 2869 ORANGE
2869 FREEPORT
2869 HOUSTON
2869 HOUSTON
2631 GALENA PARK
2631 GALENA PARK
STREAM FLOW
ICFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
RECEIVING WATER NAME MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
PHILLIPS DITCH TO HSC 548.7 37.3 1
PHILLIPS DITCH TO HSC 855 37.3 1
TRIB. TO HOUSTON SC 480 1.1 0.246 0.313
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL 1014 37.3 3.81 9.82
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL 1014 37.3 3.81 9.82
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 626 3. 1
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 626 3. 1
SABINE RIVER 8313 883 9.22 13.94
SABINE RIVER B313 839 9.22 13.94
SABINE RIVER 8313 889 9.22 13.94
BRAZOS RIVER (TIDAL) 8061 237 510 723
PATRICK BAYOU TO HSC 1014 37.3 0.63 1.89
PATRICK BAYOU TO HSC 1014 37.3 0.63 1.39
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL 1014 37.30.137 0.27
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL 1014 37.30.137 0.27
IWC
(»
30
30
30
30
30
8
8
3
3
3
100
30
30
30
30
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
24-Jul-85
24-Jul-B5
23-Apr-«4
31-Jan-84
31-Jan-84
03-Dec-84
03-Dec-84
29-Apr-87
29-Apr-87
19-Aug-B7
15-Sep-85
30-Apr-84
£9-Apr-85
21-Jul-B6
21-Jul-B5
LrrLucfii pmaiLHL/brmiUH.
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
4
0
0
e
5
26
26
22
2
2
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UKHO/CM)
1800
1800
6300
3000
2900
7900
7900
45000
40000
30000
1700
1700
HARDNESS
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
172
172
160
360
230
240
240
Lmiwuicniaiiia
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
135
135
135
380
300
330
330
PH
(SU)
6
8
7.6
7.5
7.5
8.1
8.1
7.8
7.1
8.4
8.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(HS/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MG/L)
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.3
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR %
SAT.)
7.8
7.8
7.5
84*
83%
8.2
5.9
91*
6.6
!
I
U1
<
1
!
* NPOESI
61 TX 0006033
62 TI 0006033
63 TX 0006068
64 TI 0006084
65 TX 0006084
66 TI 0006297
67 TX 0006297
68 n 0006327
69 TX 0006327
70 TX 0006327
71 TX 0006483
72 TI 0007048
73 TX 0007048
74 TX 0007056
75 TX 0007056
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
202
202
202
001
001
001
001
001
.
!
!
!
:
FACILITY NAME !
SOLTEX POLYMER CORP. 1
SOLTEX POLYMER CORP. !
ARCO POLYMERS 1
ROW 1 HAAS 1
ROHM 1 HAflS 1
NATL. DISTILLERS 1 OCX. i
NATL DISTILLERS 1 CHEN. !
DUPONT-SABINE RIVER WORKS!
DUPONT-SRBINE RIVER WORKS:
DUPONT-SABINE RIVER WORKS!
DOW CHEMICAL !
LUBRIZOL CORP.
LUBRIZOL CORP. !
U.S. SYPSUM CO. I
U.S. GYPSUM CO. !
TEST SPECIES
D. PULEI
CERIODAPHNIA
0. PULEI
P. PROtLAS
D. PULEI
D. PULEI
CERIODAPHNIA
C. VARIEGATUS
P. PROMELAS
A. PUNCTULATA
M. ALNYRA
M. BflHIfl
N. BAHIA
P. PRQMELAS
D. PULEI
TEST
LENGTH
IN -
tri-LUtm
LC50
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100% PERCENT
MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFRUENT
IN 1/VM TWOTrn »
_ ju iUV* iHHl ttf
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOCC NEC
1
7
2
4
2
1
7
8
8
1.5H
1
2
2
7
1
79 75
76
41
70 60
71 19
0 0
0
95
0
5 100 75
10
66 100 100 50
5.8
0
100
100 100
0
0
NOTES: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFaUENT
.
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT (SURVIVAL/REPRODUCTION)
VALUES QUESTIONABLE (SALINITY CONTROL NOT RUN)
96H-LC50| NO EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY DATA
NO EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY DATA
-
ChV=87*j REPRO. IN 100* EFa. LESS THAN CONTROL
NO S16. EFFECT
ChV=71*
SALTS ADDED; PART OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
-
-
CI: 12-34 (48H)
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
-------
1
!
!
! I NPDESI
i 76 TX 0007293
! 77 TX 0007323
! 78 TX 0007323
! 79 TX 0007323
! 80 TX 0007323
i 81 n 0007421
! 62 TX 0007439
1 63 TX 0007439
! 84 TX 0007552
I 65 TX 0007689
1 86 TX 0007889
1 87 n 0007889
! 68 TI 0007889
! 89 TX 0007869
1 90 TX 0007889
i
OUT-
cm i
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
101
001
FACILITY NAME
DUPONT
BAF
6AFCORP.
BAF CORP.
GAF CORP.
ARCO CHEMICAL
SDS BIOTECH CORP.
SDS BIOTECH CORP.
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
I HLii.1 iT/roaxivinu HMicn iprunrwiiun-
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING WATER NAME
2879 LAPDRTE SAN JAC1NTO BAY
2869 TEXAS CITY HOSES LAKE
2869 TEXAS CITY NOSES LAKE
2869 TEXAS CITY MOSES LAKE
2869 TEXAS CITY HOSES LAKE
2821 DEER PARK TRIB. TO PE6GY LAKE
2869 HOUSTON 6REENS BAYOU TO HSC
2869 HOUSTON GREENS BAYOU TO HSC
2821 PASADENA HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
3.49 11.14
0.19 0.33
0.19 0.33
0.19 0.33
0.19 0.33
480 1.1 0.436 1.13
228 0.71 0.57 0.9
228 0.71 0.57 0.9
855 2.21 2.85 7
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
TUT
1NL
6
16
16
16
16
30
55.44
55.44
30
8
8
8
8
6
8
SAMPLE
Pfl 1 rPTTflfcl
LULLCLllUn
DATE
19-ftug-85
17-Jan-B4
24-Feb-87
24-Feb-87
24-Feb-87
23-May-84
29-Jun-87
29-Jun-87
12-Dec-83
23-JuI-B6
23-Jul-fl6
17-*ar-87
28-Aor-«7
2B-Apr-87
28-flDT-87
urujcni miaiLHL/Lncniu*. UHWLicKiai jus
SAL-
1UTTV
INI IT
(0/00)
4
2
2
2
0
2
2
2
i
2
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
Tcurc
INNtc
(UKHO/CM)
6000
2100
2100
2100
8000
8000
1200
1200
1000
1100
1000
HARDNESS
fHC/1 OC
lno/L Ha
CaC03)
1203
300
300
300
145
145
190
190
ALKALINITY
C«C03)
25
124
124
124
37
37
122
122
f
(SU)
6.7
7.6
7.8
7.8
7.5
7.5
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.5
7.6
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
1UC
Ire
(H6/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.8
0.8
0.6
(0.1
0.6
UNION-
IZED
(HS/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
(0.1
0.1
MINI- :
MUM !
DO :
(HB/L 1
M* i
X I
SAT.) !
8.2 :
!
6.3 :
85% :
8.3 :
!
90* :
8.1 :
!
91% :
7.2 :
!
!
9ix :
91% :
I
Ui
i
OUT-
t NPDES 1 * FACILITY NAME
76 TX 0007293 001 DUPONT
77 TX 0007323 001 GAF
78 TX 0007323 001 BAF CORP.
79 TX 0007323 001 BAF CORP.
80 TX 0007323 001 BAF CORP.
81 TX 0007421 001 ARCO CHEMICAL
82 TX 0007439 001 SDS BIOTECH CORP.
83 H 0007439 001 SDS BIOTECH CORP.
84 TX 0007532 001 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
85 TI 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
86 TX 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
67 n 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
88 TX 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
69 n 0007889 101 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
90 TX 0007689 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
_,
!
1
! TEST
I LENGTH
! TM
i In
1 TEST SPECIES DAYS 2
! D. PULEI 2
1 D. PULEX 1
1 D. PULEX 2
1 C. VARIEBATUB 6
1 A. PUNCTULATA 1.5H
! D. PULEX 1
i P. PROMELAS 8
! D. PULEX 2
! 0. PULEI 2
! P. PROMELAS 7
i D. PULEI 1
i A. PUNCTULATA 1.5H
i A. PUNCTULATA 1.5H
! C. VflRIESATUS 8
I C. VARIEBflTUS 8
B-FUWII TIMICIIT
MORTALITY
IN 100%
LC50 MORTALITY DECK-OS-
4H 4BH CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFaUENT
31 22 100 100
0
0
5
HO
0
73 70
93 55
0
65 85 10
6 100 0
3.1
7.2
5
66 100
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
25 12
100 75
100 50
CVfEOTS
NOTES) CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
OiV«CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
CI:24-40(24H); ]7-29(48H)| 4 o/oo CONTROL DIED
NO EFFL. CHEMISTRY
PART OF EPA SPECIAL STUDY
NO SIB. EFFECT; PflRT OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
SALTS ADDED; PflRT OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
NO EFFLUENT CHENISTRY DflTA
CHV=17%
PIPE FLOW FOR OUTFALL 101
NO EFFLUENT CHENISTRY
CI:76-96; ChV-a7«
CI:4-8(24H)
SALTS ADDED; PflRT OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
SALTS ADDED; PflRT OF SPECIAL STUDY
SflLTS flDDED; PflRT OF SPECIftL STUDY
ChV=71%; SALTS ftODEDj PflRT OF SPECIAL STUDY
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTDCflM
JNaintHn
EFFECTS
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
. NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
-------
t NPOESI
91 TX 0007889
92 TX 0007889
93 TX 0007889
94 n 0007889
i 95 TX 0007889
! 96 TX 0007889
! 97 TX 0007889
i 98 n 0007889
i 99 TX 0007889
1100 TX 0007889
1101 TX 0007889
1102 TI 0007889
!103 TX 0007889
1104 TI 0007889
1105 TX 0007897
OUT-
Ctt 1
rtU.
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USN-CORPUB CHRISTI HAS
USN-CORPUB CHRIST! NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NRS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NRS
USN-CORPUS CHRIST! NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NRS
USN-CORPUS CHRIST! NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUB CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUB CHRISTI NRS
ALLIED CORP.
rHLiLAif/ncucivinu mien inrunnHiiurr
et r i nraTt m
aiw ujuiiiun
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING WATER NAME
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRIST! BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
2821 ORCHARD COW BAYOU
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE)
8
8
8
8
8
a
8
8
8
8
a
8
8
8
95.61
SAMPLE
rni i rmnM
UUwLCL 1 1 Un
DATE
2B-flpr-87
2£-Jun-87
E2-Jun-67
22-JurrB7
22-Jurt-B7
22-Jun-87
22-Jun-87
23-Jun-87
25-Jun-B7
25-Jun-87
26-Jun-87
26-Jun-87
15-Sep-87
15-Sep-87
19-Feb-85
SflL-
TUT TV
ini i T
(0/00)
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
2
2
trr-Lutm pmaiLH
SPECIFIC
CONDUC- HARDNESS
TQWrC f MR /I OC
IHnUC. InU/L Ha
(UKHO/CH) CaC03)
1000
900 240
900 £40
450 100
L/Ult/UUHL LMHKHL
ALKALINITY
fMC/l OC nU
ITO/L Ho pn
CaC03) (SU)
7.6
7.2
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
6.6
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.3
105 7.9
105 7.9
54 7.9
itKIblil
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
IMC
list
(MG/L)
0.6
2.9
3
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
3.8
1.3
1.3
3.5
3.5
0.7
0.7
j,
MINI-
MUM
UNION- DO
I2ED (KG/L
uu? no <
WiJ Un *
(M6/L) SAT.)
0.1
0.1 9W
0.1 8.1
I
1 NPDES 1
91 TX 0007889
92 T> 0007889
93 TX 0007889
94 TI 0007889
95 TX 0007889
% n 0007889
97 n 0007889
98 H 0007889
99 TX 0007889
100 n 0007889
101 TX 0007889
102 TX 0007889
103 TX 0007889
104 TX 0007889
10S TX 0007897
!
OUT-
roi i
rHLL
t
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUS
USN-CORPUB
USN-CORPUB
USN-CORPUS
USN-CQRPUB
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRIST!
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRISTI
CHRIST!
NRS
NAS
NRS
NAS
NRS
NAS
NAS
NAS
NAS
NAS
NAS
NAS
MS
NAS
ALLIED CORP.
-I
:
i
i
:
1 TEST SPECIES
: c.
1 N.
: c.
! A.
t C.
1 ft.
: ft.
: c.
! ft.
I ft.
: c.
! C.
! P.
; o.
PARVULA
BAHIA
PARVULfl
PUNCTULATA
VARIESATUS
PUNCTULATA
PUNCTULATA
PARVULA
PUNCTULATA
PUNCTULATA
PARVULA
PARVULA
PRDMELAS
PULEX
! CERIODftPHNIA
TEST
LENBTH
TU
tK-LUtNl lUIILm
1X50 MORTALITY
tl t AA*
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
7
7
7
1.5H
7
1.5H
1.5H
7
1.94
1.5H
7
7
8
2
7
6.1
4
5.9
13.9
0.47
7.7
HO
HO
4.5
HO
69 100
14 12 100
0
_____ ________ .. ..
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFEa AS
IN 100X PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TMorra
EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
10 3.2
7.5 5
5 2.5
>32 )32
17.5 8.8
(2.2 (2.2
7.5 5
>10 )10
HO HO
5 2.5
HO HO
10 100 50
0
COWtHI S
NOTES: CI«95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
SALTS ADDED; PART OF SPECIAL STUDY
SALTS ADDED; 30* MORT. IN 32X EFa.;OiV*5.6*
POST-CHLORINATED (FINAL); SALTS ADDED; ChV=6.U
POST-CHLORINATED (FINAL); ChV»3.5«; SALTS ADDED
9* KOflT. IN 32* EFFL. ; NO SIB. EFFECT flT 32X EFFL
DECKLORINATED; ChV»12.4; SALTS ADDED
PRECHLORINATED; CI:0-2.2; SALTS ADDED
POST-CHLORINATED (FINAL); SALTS ADDED; ChV=6.1X
PREOLORINATED; SALTS ADDED; PART OF SPEC. STUDY
POST-CHLORINATED (FINAL) ;SflLTS ADDED; SPEC. STUDY
PRECHLORINflTEDj CW=3.5; SPECIAL STUDY
POST-CHLORINATED (FINAL); PORT OF SPECIAL STUDY
ChV=71<
Ct:U-17(24H); 7-15I48H)
NO SI6. EFFECT IN REPRODUCTION
POTENTIAL
FOR
T luCTDCfltt
INSTncHN
EFFEQS
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
I
U1
00
-------
1
!
!
! OUT-
!cm i
FflLL
! NPOES 1 t FACILITY NAHE
1106 n 0008907 001 DUPONT
1107 TX 0008907 001 DUPONT
!108 TX 0008907 001 DUPONT
!109 TI 0006907 001 DUPONT
,'110 n 0006907 001 DUPONT
Mil TI 0009075 001 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
1112 TI 0009075 001 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
1113 n 0009075 001 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
1114 TI 0009148 001 PHILLIPS 66 CO.
1115 TX 0009148 001 PHILLIPS 66 CO.
1116 TX 0009181 001 SID RICHARDSON CARBON
:i 17 n 0009181 ooi SID RICHARDSON CARBON
!118 n 0022527 001 TRA-TEN MILE CREEK
1119 n 0022527 001 TERRELL
!120 n 0022606 001 USAF-LOUBHLIN (FB
1 HblLi IT/KELglVifO HH1CIS INTUimilUn .-
CfP
SIC
CODE
£869
£869
£869
£869
£869
£911
2911
2911
£911
£911
2822
£822
4952
4952
9711
i nraTt ny
UJUfTIUN
(CITY)
INBLES1DE
INGLESIDE
INGLESIDE
INGLESIDE
IN6USIDE
BORGER
BOR6ER
BORGER
BORGER
BORGER
BORGER
BORGER
FERRIS
TERRELL
VAL VERDE CO.
RECEIVING HATER NAME
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
?
?
?
E. DIJON CREEK
E. DIXON CREEK
TRIB. TO CANADIAN R.
TRIB. TO CANADIAN R.
TEN MILE CREEK
TRIB. TO KINGS CREEK
TRIB. TO SACATOSA CRK
STREAM FLOU
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7Q10
1.46
l.*6
1.46
0.27
0.27
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.1
52.25 0
17.25
.4
0
PIPE FLOU
(MED)
MEAN MAX.
2.66 6.14
2.66 6.14
2.66 6.14
2.66 6.14
2.66 6.14
5.08 7.14
5.08 7.14
0.39
0.39
11.930.22
2.14 5.93
0.57 1
fur
IHL
(X)
8
8
8
8
8
100
100
100
100
100
85
65
97.88
100
100
SAMPLE
ffl i CPTI nu
LULLctlllM
DATE
02-Sep-66
28-Apr-87
28-Apr-87
28-flpr-87
16-Sep-67
02-Jun-B7
02-Jun-87
02-Jurr87
l*-Oct-87
l*-Oct-87
l*-Ort-87
l*-Oct-87
26-Aug-86
23-Sep-86
30-Nov-87
trrmcni pmaiLHL/LntniLK.
SAL-
TUT TV
INI IT
lo/oo)
6
D
6
10
0
0
0
0
o
2
2
0
1
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
(UHHO/CM)
7500
7500
7500
19000
1100
1100
1100
1700
1700
3000
3000
900
600
790
LmiWUICKlSI 1L3
TOTAL
RESID. UNION-
HARDNESS
IMC /I AC
inb/L Ho
CaC03>
325
325
325
92
110
ALKALINITY
/Up/l AC *J
lnb/L Ho
CaC03)
67
67
67
157
7
("
(SU)
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.5
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.6
7.6
9.4
9.4
7.5
6.1
8.2
CHLOR-
TUC
IPc
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
3.2
1.5
(0.1
IZED
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
(0.1
1.8
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
m*
*
SAT.)
92*
90*
87*
8.2
8.2
94*
8.2
89*
8.3
8.2
a
1
!
!
:
!
i t NPOES 1
!I06 TX
!107 T»
!108 TX
1109 TX
!110 TX
1111 TX
1112 TX
I113TI
1114 TX
:nsn
!I16 TX
:ii7 TI
:ii8 n
M19TX
,'120 TI
!
0008907
0006907
0006907
0008907
0006907
0009075
0009075
0009075
0009148
0009148
0009181
0009161
0022527
0022527
0022606
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
DUPONT
DUPONT
DUPONT
DUPONT
DUPONT
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
SID RICHARDSON CARBON
SID RICHARDSON CARBON
UTLUtHI IUH1L1IT -'
TEST SPECIES
A. PUCTULATA
C. PARVULA
C. VARIEBATUS
A. PUNCTULATA
C. VARIEEATUS
P. PROMELAS
D. PULE*
SELENASTRUM
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
TRA-TEN NILE CREEK ! 0. PULEX
TERRELL 1 D. PULEX
USAF-iflUGHLIN AFB 1 D. PULEX
TEST
LENGTH
IN -
LC50
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC
1.5H
7
8
1.5H
9
8
2
4
2
a
2
a
2
2
2
5.9
8.7
>70
33
16 16
20
54
76
4 4
21 20
MORTALITY
IN 100*
EFFLUENT
10
15
100
100
98
5
too
10
70
100
100
0
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
I NOTED
EFFLUENT
100
0
9
100
10
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NDEC
50 25
12 6
100 50
100 50
uwtNis
NOTES: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
QAMXRON1C VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
SALTS ADDED; PART OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
SALTS ADDED; PART OF EPA SPECIAL STUDY
NO S1G. EFFECT; PART OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
SALTS ADDED; PART OF EPA SPECIAL STUDY
NO SIS. EFFECT
PERMIT DISCONT.; ChV>35*
PERMIT DISCONT. ; FLOU APPARENTLY STORMMTER
PERMIT DISCONT. ; ChW9X
NO S1G. WRT.
ChV=71X
NO SIS. MORT.
ChV=71X
NOTE «ORT IN DECHL. EFFL.
-
SEWAGE J UNPERW. PAINT-STRIPPIN6 UASTESTREAMS
POTENTIAL
FDR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
vo
-------
* NPOES 1
121 TX 0022608
122 TX 0023001
123 TX 0023001
124 TX 0023094
125 TX 0023418
126 H 0023931
127 TX 0023931
128 TX 0024228
!I29 TX 0024228
1130 TX 0024309
1131 TX 0024309
!132 TX 0024325
1133 TX 0024368
!134 n 0024368
!135 TX 0024678
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USAFHAUBHLIN AFB
VERNON
VERNON
UVALDE
KINGSVILLE
NTMyD-RICHARDSON
NTMUD-RICHARDSON
STEPHENVILLE
STEPHENVILLE
LUFKIN
LUFK1N
SHERMAN
JASPER
JASPER
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
SIC LOCATION
ODE (CITY)
9711 VAL VERDE CO.
4952 VERNON
4932 VERNON
4952 UVALDE
4952 KINGSVILLE
4952 RICHARDSON
4952 RICHARDSON
4952 STEPHENVILLE
4952 STEPHENVILLE
4952 LUFKIN
4952 LUFKIN
4952 SHERMAN
4952 JASPER
4952 JASPER
4952 GARLAND
RECEIVING WATER NAME
TRIB. TO SACATOSA CRK
PEASE RIVER
PEASE RIVER
COOKS SLOUGH/LEONA R.
TRANQUITOS CREEK
FLOYD BRANCH
DUCK CREEK
N. BOSQUE RIVER
N. BOSQUE RIVER
HURRICANE CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
CHOCTAU CREEK
SANDY CREEK
SANDY CREEK
DUCK CREEK
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (NGD)
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
0.57 1
107 0 1.45 2.82
107 0 1.45 2.82
2 1.450.024 1
48.68 0.01 1.66 4.33
11.55 0.09 2.34 4.36
11.55 0.09 2.08 4.48
30.52 0 1.44 2.8
30.52 0 1.44 2.8
35.52 0.13 4.91 6.02
35.52 0.13 4.91 6.02
121.5 6.34 7.72 9.98
58.5 0 1.59 4
58.5 0 1.59 4
11.55 0.06 21.62 29.8
I WC
(«
100
100
too
7.48
99.61
97.58
97.28
100
100
98.32
98.32
65.37
100
100
99.82
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
30-Nov-87
14-Sep-87
14-Sep-87
20-Fefr-B5
22-Oct-B4
22-May-85
15-«ay-86
OB-Dec-87
08-Dec-B7
29-Jul-85
15-Jan-66
25-Seo-85
02-*lar-B8
0£-«ar-B8
09-Sep-86
'_rmiir»rT ra-n/ctmi /rurMtrni
T^rruicni rnraiun^/uncmurv.
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
790
1200
1200
850
2100
BOO
800
1300
1300
800
1000
2500
500
500
650
HARDNESS
(KG/L AS
CaC03)
304
304
254
142
224
40
51
39
124
nun nnfrr ot r>r t rv
LHHKHLItKIST I US -
ALKALINITY
(HB/L AS
CaC03)
216
216
300
321
95
251
209
329
95
PH
(SU)
8.2
8.1
8.1
7.7
7.9
6.6
6.4
7.9
7.9
7.4
7.7
7.8
6.7
6.7
7.2
TOTAL
RESID. UNION-
CHLOR- 1ZED
IKE NH3
(MS/L) (NG/L)
(0.1 l.B
0.8 (0.1
0.8 (0.1
0.2 (0.1
0.5 2.4
0.5 2.4
3.8
0.2 (0.1
0.2 (0.1
0.5 (0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(NG/L
OR X
SAT.)
88X
8.2
95*
8.2
8.6
6.1
8.6
7.9
91X
8.4
7
8.8
92*
92*
8.2
,'
!
!
>
! 1 NPDES 1
i!21 TX 0022608
! 122 TX 0023001
1123 TX 0023001
1124 TX 0023094
!1£5 TX 0023418
!126 TI 0023931
1127 TX 0023931
1128 TX 0024228
1129 TX 0024228
!130 TX 0024309
1131 TX 0024309
1132 TX 0024325
1133 TX 0024368
!134 TX 0024368
!135 TX 0024678
i
OUT-
FBI 1
rwj.
i
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USAF-LAUGHLIN AFB
VERNON
VERNON
UVALDE
KINSSVILLE
NTNUD-RICHARDSON
NTHUD-RICHARDSON
STEPHENVILLE
STEPHENVILLE
LUFKIN
LUFKIN
SHERMAN
JASPER
JASPER
GARLANDHJUCX CREEK
1
!
p
, -- - Lrriucm IUAIUJ 1 1 -"- -
TEST
LENGTH
Tkl
i
! TEST SPECIES
; p.
1 D.
1 p.
: D.
: o.
1 D.
1 D.
: D.
! P.
: D.
: D.
i D.
: P.
: D.
: D.
>
PROMELAS
PULEX
PROMELAS
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PRONELAS
PULEX
PULEX
PULEX
PROMELAS
PULEX
PULEX
*n
DAYS
8
1
8
1
2
1
1
2
7
2
2
1
8
1
2
24H
(12
6
34
8
3
3
69
16
LC50 MORTALITY
IN tflM
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
52 100
100
30 100
0
5 100
0
100
7 100
26 100
3 100
2 100
0
8 100
95
16 100
MORTALITY
IN lOOX
DECHLOR-
ru/vrrn
IIWICU
EFFLUENT
0
100
0
0
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
100
5
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NQEC
100 50
50 25
25 12
(12 (12
NOTES: CI*95X CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
ChV=71*i SEUAGE t UNPERMITTED UASTESTREAMS
-
OtV=35Hj NOTE MORT. IN DECHL TEST
FACILITY DOESNT ALUAYS DISCHAREE
CI:4-8(24H); 4-7 (ASH) ; MOVING AVG ANGLE METHOD
-
-
CI:6-9(24H); 5-8I4BH)
NOTE MORT. IN DECHL. EFFL. (PROB. DUE TO NH3)
CI: NOT RELIABLE; TRIMMED SPEARNAN-KARBER KETHOD
-
-
ChV(12; Ch3-19j NOTE HIGH TOXj TOX. AFTER DECHL
CIJ54-98
Cl!l5-18(24H)
POTENTIAL
FOR
EFFECTS
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
O
I
-------
i
!
|
i
!
1 1 NPDESI
:i36 TX 0084678
!137 TX 0024678
1138 TX 0024686
!139 H 0024686
!140 TX 0084686
1141 TX 0085489
M42 TX 0025429
1143 TX 0085429
1144 TX 0025429
I145TX 0025429
1146 TX 0085429
1147 TX 0026263
1148 TX 0026751
M49 TX 0026751
1150 TX 0027537
OUT-
FALL
t
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
GARLANO-ROMLETT CREEK
6ARLAMHWULETT CREEK
BARLAND-ROHLETT CREEK
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
SPENCER ROAD MUD
a PASO-HASKELL
a PASO-HASKEU.
UAXAHACHIE
11 " i MulL|ir/iscLC*Yinu mien inrunflHilun-
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING MATER NAME
4952 GARLAND DUCK CREEK
4952 GARLAND DUCK CREEK
4952 GARLAND ROULETT CREEK
4952 GARLAND ROULETT CREEK
4952 GARLAND RDULETT CREEK
9711 UICHITA FALLS PLUM C. TO UICHITA R.
9711 UICHITA FALLS PLUM C. TO UICHITA R.
9711 UICHITA FALLS PLUM C. TO UICHITA R.
9711 UICHITA FALLS PLUM C. TO UICHITA R.
9711 HICHITA FALLS PLUM C. TO UICHITA R.
9711 UICHITA FALLS PLUM C. TO UICHITA R.
4952 HOUSTON HORSEPEN CREEK TO HSC
4952 a PASO RIO GRANDE
4952 a PASO RIO GRANDE
4952 UAXAHACHIE N. PRONG CREEK
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
11.55 0.06
11.55 0.06
80.85
80.85
20.85
874 86.86
274 26.86
274 86.86
274 86.86
274 26.86
874 86.86
88 0.19
1547 48.8
1547 48.8
13.71 0.1
PIPE ROW
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
21.68 89.8
81.62 89.8
10.07 12.16
10.07 12. 16
10.07 12.16
1.79 3.88
1.79 3.88
1.79 3.28
1.79 3.88
1.79 3.28
1.79 3.88
0.53 1.74
20.7 83.88
80.7 83.82
1.77 4.19
I WC
(*)
99.88
99.88
43.53
43.53
43.53
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.56
81.88
74.89
74.89
96.48
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
ll-Aug-87
ll-Aug-87
09-Sep-86
ll-flug-87
ll-flug-87
13-Jur>-85
03-Sep-86
03-Seo-86
03-Au;-87
03-Aug-87
03-Aug-87
31-«ar-86
19-Jan-88
19-Jan-8B
87-Jan-86
crruucni KnTajLHL/LncniLHi. uwio«.itruai jta
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CH)
825
885
700
800
800
1800
750
750
800
800
800
900
1100
1100
1100
HARDNESS
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
164
164
116
188
188
188
114
114
134
134
134
186
173
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
73
73
133
147
147
75
58
58
99
99
99
144
170
PH
(SU)
7.6
7.6
7.1
7.9
7.9
7.1
7.2
7.2
6.9
6.9
6.9
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.5
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(«6/L)
0.3
0.3
1.3
0.8
0.8
(0.1
(0.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
4.2
1.8
1.8
3.2
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(HG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.5
0.5
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
1.2
0.9
0.9
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR *
SAT.)
8.2
93*
7.6
81*
7
8.2
88*
7.6
8.0
90*
7.9
94*
8.2
I
CTl
i
t
!
!
:
i
: i
:i36
!137
M38
!139
!I40
1141
!I42
1143
1144
!145
M46
1147
1148
1149
!150
NPDES 1
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
0024678
0024678
0024686
0084686
0024686
0025429
0025429
0025429
0085429
0025429
0025429
0026263
0026751
0026751
0027537
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
GARLAND-RDHLETT CREEK
6ARLAND-ROULETT CREEK
6ARLAND-ROULETT CREEK
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
SPENCER ROAD HUD
a PASO-HASKELL
a PASO-HASKELL
UAXAKACHIE
1
I
!
!
!
i TEST SPECIES
1 D. PULEX
1 P. PROMELAS
1 D. PULEX
! P. PROHELAS
! D. PULEX
! D. PULEX
! P. PRONELAS
! D. PULEX
! SELENftSTRUM
! D. PULEX
! P. PROMELAS
! P. PROMELAS
! D. PULEX
i SELENASTRUM
1 D. PULEX
1)
TEST
LENGTH
DAYS 24H
2
a
2 3
a
2 11
1 7
7
1
4
2 42
a
8 4
2
4
8 3
1-LttNI IUJIL1PT
LC50 MORTALITY
WtA/W
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
0
10
3 100
31 100
9 100
100
45
10
24 85
37 100
45
4 100
(6 100
(6 100
3 100
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
INATED
EFRUENT
0
10
0
100
100
0
54
100
45
0
5
69
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
50 25
50 85
18 6
100 50
(6
UJWtW 1 b
NOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
CtiV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
NO MORT.
NO SIS. EFFECT
CI:3-3(24H); 8-3I48H)
ChV=35«; NOTE COMPLETE MORT. IN DECHL. EFFU
NOTE COMPLETE MORT. IN DECHL. EFR.
CI:6-9; CRITICAL OIL. APPLIES TO ACUTE TEST
ChV=35*
-
ChV=9*| CELL NDS. SIB. LOWER IN DECHL. TEST
CI:35-50(84H); 31-43(48H>i NOTE MORT. IN DECHL.
ChV=71*; NOTE MORT. IN DECHL, EFR.
CI:3-6(84H)j3-5(48H)
-
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAH
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES flCUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
-------
;
i
!
! « NPDES 1
1151 TX 0033201
1152 TX 0034002
1153 TX 0034738
!154 TI 0034738
:iS5 TX 0046884
1156 TX 0046864
1157 TX 0046957
!1SB TX 0046981
:159 TX 0046990
1160 TX 0047056
!161 TX 0047058
1 162 TX 0047058
::63 TX 0047074
!164 TX 0047074
i!65 TX 0047082
OUT-
cnt i
rtu.
t
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USN-K1N6SVILLE HAS
ALICE-SOUTHSIDE
GULF CHDU METALLURGICAL
GULF CHEM.t METALLURGICAL
HOUSTON-NORTHSIDE
HOUSTON-NORTHSIDE
AUSTIN-60VALLE
AUSTIN-WALNUT CREEK
BEAUMONT
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-UEST SIDE
CORPUS CHRISTI-UEST SIDE
CORPUS CHRISTI-ALLISON
1 IHLIHIT/KELtlVlHU MHItH 1WUIWHI IUT"
err i nraTifiM
lib LULHIlUn
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING WATER NAME
9711 KINBSVILLE CLEAR CREEK
4952 ALICE LATTAS CREEK
3341 FREEPORT DOW M" CANAL
3341 FREEPORT DOW "A" CANAL
4952 HOUSTON BUFFALO BAYOU
4952 HOUSTON BUFFALO BAYOU
4952 AUSTIN COLORADO RIVER
4952 AUSTIN UALNUT CR. /COLORADO R.
4952 BEAUMONT HILDEBRANDT BAYOU
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI OSO BAY
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI OSO BAY
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI OSO BAY
STREAM ROW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
MEAN 7D10 MEAN MAX.
715 0.16 0.2
172.3 0.04 0.87 3.37
694.26 539.27 0.082 0.17
694.26 539.27 0.082 0.17
624 1.68 19.85 47.64
624 1.68 19.85 47.64
1757 62.53 22.81 39.59
25.25 0.58 31.4 54.2
3823 995.4 19.9 90.9
11.87 23.6
11.87 23.6
11.87 23.6
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LA VOLLO CRK TO OSO CRK 2.52 6.2
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LA VOLLO CRK TO OSO CRK 2.52 6.2
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI NUECES RIVER
1077 £3.42 2.04 4.3
SAMPLE
TUT rfi i prriflM
IWlf LULLCLIlUn
(*) DATE
65.96 22-Oct-BA
97.12 20-MayBS
0.24 16-Sep-85
0.24 24-SBD-66
94.82 22-Feb-84
94.82 22-Jul-85
36.12 29-Jan-B6
98.8 30- Ju 1-85
16 ll-Feb-85
8 09-Jun-a?
8 09-Jun-87
8 09-Jim-B7
25-Aug-B7
25-fluo-67
11.9 25-flug-B7
crrujtrti HmaiLHt/ucmLHL UVWHLItKlaliLa
SAL-
TMTTV
iWi 1 T
lo/oo)
2
76
125
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
1
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TOMTF
IHJiLC
(UMHO/DO
2300
1400
750
800
900
600
550
1350
1950
1950
4100
4100
3000
HARDNESS
/MR /I AC
tnu/L Ha
CaC03)
192
204
182
112
185
0
94
477
477
477
640
640
342
ALKALINITY
fMG/l fiQ -"
iHU/L MD
CaC03)
226
232
268
128
105
102
102
109
109
109
183
183
86
i"
(SU)
7.6
7.4
8.9
6.2
7.5
8
7
7
7.6
7.1
7.1
7.1
6.5
6.5
6.9
TOTAL
RESID. UNION-
CHLOR- 1ZED
IMP taJ7
1HL Nn
SAT.)
9
4.2
6
89*
7.8
8.6
7.6
7.6
8.4
90*
8.4
7.9
95*
7.8
1
!
!
!
;
: « NPDES I
:1S1 TX 0033201
1152 TX 0034002
M53 TX 0034738
1154 TX 0034738
1155 TX 0046884
1156 TX 0046884
:i57 TX 0046957
1158 TX 0046981
1159 TX 0046990
!160 TX 0047058
1161 TX 0047056
1162 TX 0047058
!I63 TX 0047074
1164 TX 0047074
1165 TX 0047062
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USNHUN6SVILLE HAS
ALICE-SOUTHSIDE
GULF CHEH.I METALLURGICAL
GULF CHEH.I METALLURGICAL
HOUSTOV-M1RTHSIDE
HOUSTQN-NORTHSIDE
AUSTIN-60VALLE
AUSTIN-WALNUT CREEK
BEAUMONT
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-iEST SIDE
CORPUS CHRISTI-UEST SIDE
CORPUS CHRISTI-ALLISON
»__--__
em.ueni IUJULUT
TEST
LENGTH LC50
TEST SPECIES
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
«, ALMYRA
C. VftRIEGATUS
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
P. PROKELAS
D. PULEX
SELENASTRUN
D. PULEX
P. PRQMELAS
P. PROKELAS
IN
DAYS
1
1
1
8
2
1
2
1
2
8
2
4
1
8
8
24H 48H CHRONIC
(0.5
3
14 14
72 68
3 2
16 16
70
17 17
6
(3
14
MORTALITY
IN 100*
EFaUENT
0
0
100
100
100
100
100
0
100
75
100
98
100
100
15
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFaUENT
Th;nTfn
EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
5 1
0
0
0
20 (12 (12
60
2 (6 (6
40
15 25 6
10
"-" ~~ t,(JP|P(tH 1 ^* - - - -' ---- --L - »
NOTES: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
-
-
100* MDRT. IN 76 o/oo { 0* IN 40 o/oo CONTROLS
CI:2-4j ChV=2*; NO SIG. MORT. IN SALINITY CNTRLS
-
CI: 67-77 (24H); 64-73 (48H)
-
-
CI: 15-18 (24 J 4BH)
SIG. M03T. IN DECHL. EFFL. i TOXIC IN LOW OIL.
NOTE RORT. IN DECHL. EFFL.
-
NOTE MORT. IN DECHL. TEST
ChV=12*; TOXICITY PROBABLY DUE TO ZINC
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
CT>
NJ
I
-------
1
;
!
! OUT-
1 FALL
! « NPDES 1 1
1166 TX 00*7062 001
1167 T( 0047104 001
lisa n 0047104 ooi
1169 TX 0047104 001
1170 TX 0047295 001
!I71 TI 0047309 001
1173 TX 00*7309 001
!173 TX 0047431 001
1174 TX 0047651 001
1175 TX 0047651 001
1176 TX 0047630 001
!177 TX 0047830 001
1178 TX 0047848 001
! 1 79 TX 0058761 001
1180 TX 0052825 001
FACILITY NAME
CORPUS offlisn-AaisoN
C. CHRISTI-LA6UNA HAORE
C. CHRISTI-LAGUNA MADRE
C. CHRISTI-LAGUNR MflDRE
FORT UORTH-VILLAGE CREEK
6ALVESTON-MAIN
6ALVESTON-WUN
NTMUO-HESfflJlTE
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
DALLAS-CENTRAL
DALLAS-CENTRAL
DALLAS-SOUTHSIDE
SHELL DEVaOPMENT CO.
PENNHALT CORP.
rw.ii.iiT/NCLCivinb NHICK ipruwiHuuw
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING WATER NONE
4953 CORPUS CHRISTI NUECES RIVER
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LABUNA HAORE
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LACUNA MADRE
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LflGUNA HADRE
4952 FORT WORTH U. FORK TRINITY RIVER
4952 GflLVESTQN 6ALVESTON BAY
4952 GALVESTQN 6ALVESTON BAY
4952 NESQUITE HESOU1TE CREEK
4952 TEMPLE LITTLE ELM CREEK
4952 TEMPLE LITTLE ELM CREEK
4952 DALLAS TRINITY RIVER
4952 DALLAS TRINITY RIVER
4952 DALLAS TRINITY RIVER
7391 HOUSTON D. TO N. FORK BRAYS B.
2819 BEAUMONT OLD R. TO HECHES R.
STREAM aOU
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7Q10
1077 23.42
1160 3.83
12.21 0.09
14.29 0.73
14.29 0.73
2122 213.56
2122 213.56
£196 430
0
8165 1060.5
PIPE FLOU
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
2.04 4.3
1.45 2.66
1.45 2.66
1.45 2.66
106 207
6.79 15.24
6.79 15.24
9.49 16.2
2.89 11.6
2.89 11.6
162 254
162 254
33.9 49.7
0.36 0.54
0.004
IUC
It)
11.9
8
8
8
97.72
8
a
99.39
85.99
85.99
50. 8
50.8
10.69
100
0.0006
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
25-Aug-87
09-Jun-87
09-Jun-87
09-Jun-B7
0?-Seo-86
17-Apr-87
17-Apr-fl7
06-«iy-fl6
04-Sep-«4
05-
32
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
86
95
95
95
137
76
76
158
220
241
103
117
65
70
1
pH
(SU)
6.9
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.5
7.0
7.0
7.4
7.8
7.9
7.2
7.6
7.2
7.7
7.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(NE/L)
0.2
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.3
0.6
0.6
1
0.7
0.9
1.8
3.6
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
3.3
0.1
0.6
(0.1
(0.1
i
MINI-
RUM
DO
(HG/L
OR X
SAT.)
7.8
90)1
8.4
8.1
83*
6.6
a
8.4
7.8
8.3
8
8.6
90*
j
;
i
;
:
: * NPDES i
1166 TX 0047082
1167 TX 0047104
1168 TX 0047104
1169 TX 0047104
1170 TX 0047295
1171 TX 0047309
1172 TX 0047309
1173 TX 0047431
1174 TX 0047651
1175 TX 0047651
!176 TX 0047830
M77TX 0047B30
!I7B TI 0047848
1179 TX 0052761
1180 TX 0052825
!
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
CORPUS CHRISTI-ALLISON
C. CHRISTI-LAEUNA HADRE
C. CHRISTI-LAGUNA MADRE
C. CHRISTI-LAGUNA MflDRE
FORT WORTH-VILLASE CREEK
6ALVESTON-MAIN
GALVESTON-MflIN
NTMHCSOUITE
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
DALLAS-CENTRAL
DALLAS-CENTRAL
DALLA5-SOUTKSIK
SHELL DEVELOPMENT CO.
PENNUALT CORP.
TEST
trrLueni
LENGTH LC50
TEST SPECIES
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
SELEWSTRUM
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
SELENASTRUN
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEI
D. PULEI
D. PULEI
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
IN
DAYS
2
8
4
2
2
4
7
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
IUJUL1I!
MORTALITY
- TM Ifi/W
------ 111 IW*
24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
9 9
37 27
22 1
17 16
3 3
15 13
4 4
36 33
(1
10
66 65
14 97
100
100
42
0
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
35 100
MORTALITY
IN 100%
DECHLOS-
INflTED
EFFLUENT
0
50
65
0
0
9
10
10
100
0
0
0
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NDEC
(12 (12
12 6
(12 6
50 25
NOTES: CI=95X
Lunncn 1 3
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChVWHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFaUENT
-
-
ChV=W
-
CI:32-44(24H);
-
NO SIG. EFFECT
CI: 18-26 (24H)j
CI: 15-19 (24H)
NOTE 10GX MORT
CI:13-18(24H);
-
CI:29-44(24H);
-
CMM5X
,
21-35<48H>
ACUTE CRIT. DIL.=100*
; 14-18 (48H)
IN DECHL. EFFL.
!0-18(48H)
27-40 (48H)
_
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
-------
i " " rHiiLl iT/ncLciviw HHicn inrumwiiun
!
!
!
|
! I NPDES i
1181 TX 0052825
,'182 TX 0052825
1163 TX 0052892
1184 n 0053023
1185 TX 0053023
1186 TX 0055611
1187 TX 0056111
1168 TX 0056731
I1B9 TX 0057643
,'190 TX 0059447
1191 TX 0067695
!192 TX 0067695
!193 TX 0067695
1194 TX 0068934
1195 TX 0068934
i
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
PENNUALT CORP.
PENNUALT CORP.
LEHISV11U
CHAMPION PAPER CO.
CHAMPION PAPER CO.
GREENVILLE
USAF-LAOUflND AFB
CORSICANA-PLANT K
GCUDA-SUGARLAND
COW CHEMICAL
NORTHSTAR STEEL
NORTHSTAR STEEL
NORTHSTAR STEEL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY)
2819BEflUMDNT
2819 BEAUMONT
4952 LEHISVILLE
2621 HOUSTON
2621 HOUSTON
4952 6REENVILLE
9711 SAN ANTONIO
4952 CORSICANA
4953 TEXAS CITY
2869 FREEPORT
3312 BEAUMONT
3312 BEAUMONT
3312 BEAUMONT
2821 BEAUMONT
2821 BEAUMONT
RECEIVING UATER NAME
OLD R. TO HECHES R.
OLD R. TO NECHES R.
ELM FK. TRINITY RIVER
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
COULEECH CREEK
TRIB. TO MEDIO CREEK
RICHLAND CREEK
BALVESTONBAY
BRAZOS RIVER (TIDAL)
NECHES RIVER
NECHES RIVER
NECHES RIVER
MiaOW MARSH BAYOU
UILLOU MARSH BAYOU
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (MED)
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
8165 1060.5 0.004
8165 1060.5 0.004
580 50.44 4.35 8.58
855 2.2 15,7 20.4
855 2.2 15.7 20.4
65.16 0.14 2.98 6.54
34.1 1.2 0.27 0.7
92 0.7 2.59 8.4
7.59 13.35
697.8 543.25 0.92 4.4
8165 1060.5 0.66 2.6
8165 1060.5 0.66 2.6
8165 1060.5 0.66 2.6
146 27 0.45 0.79
146 27 0.45 0.79
iuc
(*>
0.0006
0.0006
100
30
30
97.06
25.86
85.15
8
0.26
0.096
0.0%
0.096
2.52
46.58
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
19-Aug-87
19-Aug-87
17-Sep-86
30-Apr-85
30-Apr-35
23-Jul-85
23-Ort-84
03-Sep-66
29-Api-85
27-«ay-87
19-Aug-87
19-flug-87
19-Aug-87
30-NOV-B3
19-Feb-85
trrmcni mTsiixL/uiuiiut.
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
37
0
0
0
1
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CW
550
550
825
2500
2500
800
1000
750
2500
45000
250
250
250
1200
HARDNESS
(K6/L AS
CaC03)
32
32
183
180
130
152
254
154
182
46
46
46
72
UWKHLItKlbl ILS
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
1
1
124
50
50
151
241
117
305
45
45
45
58
pH
(SU)
7.4
7.4
7.7
6.6
6.6
7.6
7.5
7.5
7.8
8.3
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
1.3
2.3
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(M6/L
OR *
SAT.)
7.4
8.2
7.2
8.6
7.5
8.6
7.2
61*
8.1
93*
7.2
I
CTN
i
I
1
;
:
! 1 NPDES 1
1181 TX 0052825
1182 TX 0052825
,'183 TX 0052892
1184 TX 0053023
iI85 TX 0053023
!1B6 TX 0055611
1187 TX 0056111
1188 TX 0056731
!189 TX 0057843
!190 TX 0059447
1191 TX 0067695
1192 H 0067695
1193 TX 0067695
i!94 TX 0068934
:195 TX 0068934
! _
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
PENNUALT CORP.
PENNUALT CORP.
LEWISVILLE
CHAMPION PAPER CO.
CHAMPION PAPER CO.
GREENVILLE
USflF-LflOUflND AFB
CORSICANA-PLANT 12
6CUDA-SUGARLAHO
DOW CHEMICAL
NORTHSTAR STEa
NORTHSTAR STEa
NDRTHSTAR STEa
MOBIL CHEMICAL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
trrLucni IUMIJIT
TEST SPECIES
D. PULEI
EaensTRM
D. PULEX
CERIQDAPHNIA
0. PULEX
0. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
C. VRRIEGATUS
D. PULEX
P. PRONELAS
SELENBSTRUN
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
TEST
LENGTH LCSO
IN
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC
2 20
4 92
1 3
7
1
233
2 4 3
1 4
1
9 61
2
8
4 61
1
1
MORTALITY
IN 100*
EFFLUENT
100
57
100
100
0
100
100
100
0
100
10
15
56
0
0
MDRTflLITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
INATED
EFFLUENT
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
100 50
25 10
50 25
25 12
NOTES: CI=95X CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChV=CHRDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
CI«16-25
ChV=71*t STIMULATION IN 25* AND 50* EFFLUENT
-
ChV-16*; NOEC/LOEC SAME FOR SURVIVAL » REPRO.
-
CI:3-4
C!:3-6(24H>; 1-6<48H); BINOMIAL METHOD
MQRT. IN DECHL. TEST; ACUTE CHIT. DIL.=10W
-
ChV=35*
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
ChV=17X
NO EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
-------
1
J
1
!
I NPDESI
!196 n 0068934
1197 TX 0068934
1198 TX 0072982
1199 TX 0072982
1200 TI 0076996
1201 H 0076996
1202 TX 0084409
1203 TI 0065570
!204 TX 0088170
!205 n 0088170
1206 TX 0088781
!207 n 0088781
1208 TX 0089125
!209 TX 0089125
1210 TX 0089125
i ______
'" 1 HLtUA IT/KtUClVinU WHICH 1WUIWIHUUK '
OUT-
fu i
FHU.
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
MOBIL CHEMICAL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
HOLLY FARMS
HOLLY FARMS
CAIN CHEMICAL
CAIN CHEMICAL
DENKA CHEMICAL
FORMOSA PLASTICS
NEUBRAUNfELS
NEW BRAUNFELS
HI-TEK POLYMERS
HI-TEK POLYMERS
EXXON CHEMICAL
EXXON CHEMICAL
EXXON CHEMICAL
CTP i miTTm
OIL LULMIIUN
ODE (CITY) RECEIVING HATER NffC
2821 BEAUMONT UIOOU MARSH BAYOU
2821 BEAUMONT WILLOU MARSH BAYOU
2016 CENTER PRAIRIE CD. /TENAHA CR.
2016 CENTER PRAIRIE CR. /TENAHA CR.
2824 CORPUS CHRISTI C.C. INNER HARBOR
2824 CORPUS CHRISTI C.C. INKER HARBOR
2822 HOUSTON SIMS BAYOU TO HSC
2869 POINT COMFORT TRIB. TO COX CREEK
4952 NEW BRAItraS GUAOALUPE RIVER
4952 NEW BRAUNFELS GUADALUPE RIVER
2833 VERNON PEASE R. TO RED R.
2833 VERNON PEASE R. TO RED R.
2821 MONT BELVIEU CEDAR BAYOU
2821 MONT BELVIEU CEDAR BAYOU
2821 MONT BELVIEM CEDAR BAYOU
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7Q10
146 27
146 27
159.65 6.8
159.65 6.8
837 340.44
837 340.44
102.15 0.2
102.15 0.2
0.27
0.27
0.27
PIPE FLOU
(MGO)
MEAN MAX.
0.45 0.79
0.45 0.79
0.62 1.06
0.62 1.06
1.3 2.48
1.3 2.48
1.37 1.98
2.07 5.74
2.07 5.74
0.32 0.76
0.32 0.76
0.64 0.38
0.64 0.38
0.64 0.38
TUT
1NU
46.58
46.58
12.36
12.36
8
8
30
15
0.38
0.38
71.26
71.26
78.61
78.61
78.61
SAMPLE
cm i cpTtfiy
UJLLCL 1 1 UN
DATE
30-Jun-87
30-Jurr87
10-Feb-87
10-Feb-67
16-Feb-88
16-Feb-88
17-Oct-85
15-Aor-87
12-Aug-87
12-flug-B7
14-Sep-87
14-Sep-87
02-Jim-87
02-Jun-87
02-Jun-87
trrmeni mTsiiHL/LnuiiiHL wwiotitmbiiLb
SAL
IMITV
INI IT
(o/oo)
0
0
1
1
0
0
4
7
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TflklPC
IHNLC
(UHHO/CM)
950
950
1100
1100
4000
4000
9000
8500
1400
1400
5000
5000
2200
2200
2200
HARDNESS
fhtC/l OC
tno/L Ha
CaC03)
82
62
124
124
IBS
368
368
280
280
210
210
210
ALKALINITY
/KG/I oo
\nD/L K3
CaCIXS)
34
34
121
121
600
139
139
740
740
53
58
58
rdj
P"
(SU)
7.3
7.3
6.8
6.8
8.2
8.2
8.5
8.3
7.9
7.9
8.1
8.1
7.4
7.4
7.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLDR-
TUC
Inb
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
(0.1
1
1
(0.1
(0.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
UNION-
IZED
UU7
Wlo
(H3/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
1.8
1.8
0.8
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
Mv
%
SAT.)
8.2
90%
87%
7.6
97%
93%
8.6
87%
92%
8
8.1
91%
8
93%
;
;
:
;
;
i NPDESt
i
i '-
1196 TX
1197 TX
1198 TX
1199 TX
1200 TX
1201 TX
!202 TX
1203 TI
1204 TX
1205 TX
1206 TX
1207 TX
1208 n
1209 TX
1210 TX
0068934
0068934
0072982
0072982
0076996
0076996
0084409
0085570
0088170
0088170
0088781
0088781
0089125
0089125
0089125
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
MOBIL CHEMICAL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
HOLLY FARMS
HOLLY FARMS
CAIN CHEMICAL
CAIN CHEMICAL
DENKA CHEMICAL
FORMOSA PLASTICS
NEMBRAUNFELS
NEU BRAUFELS
HI-TEK POLYIERS
HI-TEK POLYMERS
EXION CHEMICAL
EXXON CHEMICAL
EXXON CHEMICAL
;
!
i
:
!
! TEST SPECIES
f
1 ^^
: D.
: P.
i P.
: D.
: D.
: P.
: D.
! C.
: P.
! D.
: D.
! P.
: o.
PJLEX
PROHEUB
PROMELAS
PULEX
PULEX
PROMELAS
PUUX'
VARIEGflTUS
PRDMELAS
PULEI
PULEX
PROMELAS
PULEX
! SaENASTHUM
! P.
1
PROttLAS
u-i-LUtni
TEST
LENGTH LC50
Tkj _,
in -
IUI1L1IT
MORTALITY
TM HVrt
r^"-- m I\AJ*
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
2
8
a
2 24 22
2 40
8
2 55 55
8
8
2 15 12
2
8
2
4
8
5
30
35
100
100
52 100
100
67 100
57 90
100
15
20
5
44
10
MORTALITY
IN 100%
DECHLDR-
INATED
EFFLUENT
30
40
100
65
100
60
40
0
38
5
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFRUENT
LOECNOEC
25 12
100 50
50 25
100 50
100 50
100 50
100 50
NOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV°CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
_
ChV*17X
ChV°71X; NOTE: SIGNIFICANT MORT. IN DECHL. EFFL.
CI:20-22(24H); 19-26I48H)
CI:32-51; SI6. MORT. IN 30-10W EFFL.
ChV=35%
CI:48-64(24 ( 48H)| 100% HORT. IN 4 o/oo CONTROL
ChV-71%
ChV=71%; NOTE KORT. IN DECHL. EFK.
C1:11-20(24H); 8-17I48H); MORT. IN DECHL. EFFL.
NO 516. HORT.
ChV=71«j SIB. MORT. IN 100% EFFL.
-
ChV=71%
NO SIB. EFFECT
POTENTIAL
FDR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
-------
1 NPDES 1
211 U 0089567
212 TK 0089567
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NAME
001 U.R. BRACE
001 H.R. BRACE
SIC
CODE
2899
2899
LOCATION
(CITY) RECEIVING UATER NAME
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
30
30
PIPE FLOW
(160)
flip
KEAN MAX. (*)
0.017
0.017
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
26-flug-86
26-Aug-86
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
2
2
tCI-LUtftl mVblLH
SPECIFIC
CONDUC- HARDNESS
TANCE (HG/L AS
(UWO/CH) CaC03)
2300
2300
60
60
L/UUIUI. UWiHUtlUSTICS
TOTAL
RESID. UNION-
ALKALINITY CHLOR- 1ZED
(MG/L AS pH 1NE NH3
CaC03) (SU) (HG/L) (HG/L)
170
170
7.8
7.8
(0.1 (0.1
(0. 1 (0. 1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR X
SAT.)
8.4
87X
OUT-
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
211 TX 0089567 001 U.R. GRACE
812 TX 0089567 001 U.R. GRACE
u-t-uuENr TOIICIIT
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100X PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFaUENT
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H *flH CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEI 2 5
P. PROMELAS 7 10
CUMKNTS
NOTES: CI«95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChV
-------
-67-
APPENDIX B.
Relative Sensitivity of Effluent Toxicity Tests.
-------
-68-
APPENDIX B.I.
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daphnia pulex. 8 d Fathead Minnow,
and 96 h Alqal (Selenastruro caDricornutinM T<
Concurrently for 38 Effluents.
SAMPLE DAPHNIA
NPDES #
AR
AR
AR
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
OK
OK
OK
OK
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
0001449
0034321
0035645
0000191
0000752
0003301
0003301
0003301
0003301
0006131
0006831
0007561
0007854
0007854
0020087
0029769
0032417
0038091
0046477
0056651
0001031
0001261
0022616
0027553
0000353
0000892
0003891
0006025
0006025
0009075
0025429
0026751
0047058
0047104
0047309
0052825
0067695
0089125
001
001
001
001
001
001
321
511
521
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
101
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
AT&T TELETYPE
HARRISON
GLEN WOOD
SEQUOYAH FUEL
UN I ROYAL CHEMICAL CO.
DOW CHEMICAL
DOW CHEMICAL
DOW CHEMICAL
DOW CHEMICAL
TECHNIGRAPHICS
BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
IMC
IMC
OBERLIN
AGRICO
ATLAS PROCESSING
NEW ORLEANS
JONESBORO
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
VISTA POLYMER
EAGLE PICKER
GUYMON-SWIFT PLANT
OKLA. C1TY-CHISHOLH CRK
GENERAL DYNAMICS
BELL HELICOPTER
TEMPLE-EASTEX
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
EL PASO-HASKELL
CORPUS CHRIST I -OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-LM
GALVESTON-MAIN
PENNWALT CORP.
NORTHSTAR STEEL
EXXON CHEMICAL
DATE
20-May-87
05-May-87
21-Jul-87
11-Aug-87
11-Aug-87
15-Jul-87
15-Jul-87
15-Jul-87
15-Jul-87
04-Aug-87
22-Jul-87
19-May-87
19-May-87
19-May-87
21-Jul-87
02-Feb-88
17-Nov-87
08-Dec-87
23-Jun-87
02-Nov-87
10-Feb-88
09-Jun-87
27-Oct-87
09-Feb-88
13-Jul-87
13-Jul-87
26-Jan-88
02-Feb-87
21-Sep-87
02-Jun-87
03-Aug-87
19-Jan-88
09-Jun-87
09-Jun-87
17-Apr-87
19-Aug-87
19-Aug-87
02-Jun-87
(48H)
NSE
<6
27
NSE
5
NSE
NSE
NSE
O2
NSE
NSE
NSE
16
36
NSE
NSE
*
<6
NSE
--
NSE
<6
--
NSE
NSE
<1
NSE
45
NSE
16
37
<6
17
9
--
20
NSE
NSE
LC/EC50
MINNOW
(8D)
NSE
61
46
NSE
<25
NSE
NSE
NSE
--
NSE
NSE
36
8
4
NSE
--
47
27
87
36
NSE
11
64
NSE
NSE
31
--
NSE
NSE
33
-100
--
70
66
NSE
35
NSE
NSE
oxicity Tests Conduc
ALGA
(96H)
NSE
<6
31
36
<6
*
-100
*
-100
-100
24
11
46
<6
02
94
NSE
<3
11
*
NSE
<3
53
NSE
*
28
NSE
<6
37
20
24
<6
6
14
*
92
61
*
SUSPECTED
TOXICANT(S)
NH3/CL2/OTHER
CL2/OTHER
?
pH/OTHER
?
?
PH
SALINITY/pH/CL2
SALINITY ?
?
ORGAN I CS ?
NH3
NH3
?
NH3
?
CL2/NH3
NH3
NH3
CL2
?
METALS ?
COPPER
NH3
OR CAN I CS ?
METALS ?
NH3/CL2
CL2/OTHER
NH3/CL2
NH3/CL2/OTHER
NH3/CL2/OTHER
CL2
?
?
CL2/OTHER
NSE=NO SIGNIFICANT TOXIC EFFECT
*=SIGNIF1CANT TOXIC EFFECT IN 100% OR LOWER EFFLUENT DILUTION
--=NOT TESTED
-------
-69-
APPENDIX B.2.
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daphnia pulex and 8 d Fathead
Minnow Toxicity Tests Conducted Concurrently for 96 Effluents,
IC/ECSO
NPDES «
AR 0000523
AR 0000680
AR 0001256
Aft 0001236
AR 000 1678
AR 0001018
AR 0020702
Aft 0033278
AR 0033375
AR 0033375
AR 0033766
AR 0034380
AR 003U52
LA 0000(93
LA 0000841
LA 0003549
LA 0003689
LA 0003735
LA 0003824
LA 0004154
LA 0005258
LA 00059(1
LA 0005991
LA 00060(1
LA 0007579
LA 0007684
LA 0052370
LA 0059153
OK 0000531
OK 0000744
OK 0000795
OK 0000809
OK 0000809
OK 0026701
OK 00268(1
OK 0027931
OK 0029131
OK 0030295
OK 0030295
OK 00352(6
TX 0000353
TX 0000892
TX 0003522
TX 000(871
TX 0006025
TX 0007056
TX 0007(39
TX 0007889
TX 0007889
TX 0009148
TX 0009181
TX 0022608
TX 0023001
TX 002(228
TX 002(368
TX 002(678
TX 002(686
TX 00(707(
TX 00(7082
TX 0068934
TX 0072982
TX 0076996
TX 0088170
TX 0088781
TX 0089567
002
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
005
001
007
001
001
001
003
001
001
005
005
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
007
101
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
STRATEGIC MINERALS
GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
TYSON FOODS
BATESVILLE
FORT SMITN-P STREET
STERLING FAUCET
STERLING FAUCET
PARAGOULO
STUTTGART
USA-FORT CHAFFEE
REICHNOLD CHEMICAL
EXXON CORP.
USA-LOU. ARMY AMMO. PLT
H1MONT-HERCULES
LAKE CHARLES CARBON
FIRESTONE
COLUMBIA CHEMICAL
GEORGIA PACIFIC
CITGO CITIES SERVICE
KAISER ALUMINUM
TEXACO
LOU. POWER S LIGHT
STONE CONTAINER
CALCASIEU REFINING
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
ALLIED MATERIALS
UEYEDHAUSER
TYSON FOODS
USAF-TINKER AFB
USAF-TINKER AFB
CUSNING-SOUTH STP
MIDWEST CITY-NORTHSIDE
MOORE
MUSKOGEE
USA-FORT SILL
USA-FORT SILL
UUTON
GENERAL DYNAMICS
BELL HELICOPTER
AMOCO OIL CO.
SHELL OIL CO.
CELANESE CHEMICAL
U.S. GYPSUM CO.
$05 BIOTECH
USN- CORPUS CHRIST I NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
SID RICHARDSON
USAF-LAUGHLIN AFB
VERNON
STEPHENVILLE
JASPER
GARLAND -DUCK CREEK
GARLAND-ROULETT CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI -WESTSIDE
CORPUS CHRISTI-ALLISON
MOBIL CHEMICAL
HOLLY FARMS
CAIN CHEMICAL
NEW BRAUNFELS
CELANESE
W.R. GRACE
DATE
2S-Feb-86
23-Sep-B6
29-Oct-86
16-Mar-88
19-Oet-87
22-Feb-8a
29-MBI--S8
31-M«y-88
22-Jul-BS
21-Apr-86
09-Sep-S7
19-Oet-87
31-M»y88
OS-D«-86
03-Dec-86
29-Fet>-88
CU-Mar-86
21-Apr-B6
16-Feb-88
27-AUJ-87
11-AU9-B7
M-Mar-86
U-Sep-87
11-Feb-B6
23-Jun-86
16-JU1-B6
17-Feb-88
20-Oct-86
10-Jun-88
08-Feb-BS
19-NOV-B6
30-Jul-86
17-AU8-87
20 -Jin- 88
12-APr-88
17-AU8-87
20-Oct-B7
04-Oec-86
29-Mar-B8
29-Mar-8e
10-$ep-B6
18-AU8-86
IO-Aus-87
30-Jut-86
02-Feb-87
21-Jul-86
29-Ji»v87
23-JUI-86
15-Sep-87
1(-Oct-87
U-Oet-87
30-NOV-87
U-Sep-87
08-Oee-87
02-M«r-88
11-Sep-S7
11-Sep-87
25-AU9-87
2S-Aug-87
30-Jm-87
10-Feb-87
16-Feb-a8
12-AU8-87
1(-Sep-87
26-Aug-B6
DAPHNIA
C48H)
U
67
70
27
36
18
NSE
83
NSE
NSE
NSE
NSE
NSE
73
47
NSE
71
NSE
NSE
NSE
81
44
NSE
NSE
NSE
79
NSE
NSE
79
68
32
<6
27
9
29
3
<3
21
3
12
36
NSE
45
NSE
93
6
12
NSE
NSE
NSE
<12
7
69
NSE
9
<3
NSE
NSE
22
40
12
NSE
NSE
MINNOW
(80)
NSE
73
28
e
46
56
93
76
56
-100
-100
17
59
13
60
23
87
NSE
NSE
NSE
57
25
52
91
NSE
NSE
NSE
100
47
4
37
30
NSE
25
56
36
28
17
NSE
21
72
20
NSE
NSE
NSE
73
85
69
54
76
52
30
26
8
NSE
31
14
NSE
52
57
NSE
SUSPECTED
TOXICANT(S)
VANADIUM
ORGAN! CS ?
NH3
NH3
NH3
CL2
CL2
NK3
METALS
METALS
NH3
NH3
CL2/OTHERS
ORGAN ICS OR H2S
NH3
?
NH3/SALINITY
7
NH3
NH3
NH3
7
NH3/SAL1NITT
NH3/CL2
NH3
NH3
CL2/OTHER
CL2/OTHER
1
CL2/OTHERS
CL2
CL2/OTHERS
CL2/OTHERS
CL2
CL2
NH3/CL2
COPPER
NH3
METALS ?
7
CL2
0.2
ORGAN ICS 7
ORGAN ICS 7
NH3
CL2/OTHERS
NH3/CL2
CL2/OTHERS
NH3/CL2/OTHERS
CL2
7
CL2
NH3/C12
CL2/OTHERS
7
MOST
SENSITIVE
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
SAME
DAPHNIA
SAME
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
SAME
SAME
DAPHNIA
SAME
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
OAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
DAPNNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
SAME
DAPHNIA
SAME
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
SAME
DAPHNIA
DAPMN1A
SAME
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
OAPHNIA
MINNOW
SAME
NSE'NO SIGNIFICANT TOXIC EFFECT
SIGNIFICANTANT TOXIC EFFECT IN 100X OR LOWER EFFLUENT DILUTION
-------
-70-
APPENDIX C.
Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Municipal Discharges,
-------
-71-
APPENDIX C.I: PLASTICS MATERIALS AND RESINS (SIC CODE 2821)
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Ceriodaphnia
dubia 7d
Chronic
Selenastrum
capricornutum
96h chronic
PUT ATTVE"
£\I:«J-tnl 1 V LJ
TOXICITY
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
AR LA OK TX
118
1 1
1 2
113
2 1
1
1
1 2
1
1
1
NO.
10
2
3
5
3
1
1
3
I
1
1
TOTALS
PERCENT
67 %
13 %
20 %
50 %
30 %
10 %
10 %
75 %
25 %
50 %
50 %
-------
-72-
APPENDIX C.2: INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS (SIC CODE 2869)
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Selenastrum
capricornutum
96h chronic
Cyprinodon
variegatus
8d chronic
Mysidopsis
bahia or almyra
48h acute
RFT ATTVF
ix&LirH 1 VCj
TOXIC I TY
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NUMBER OF
AR LA
3 6
2
2 4
4
1
4
1
6
1
1
2
SAMPLES
OK TX
3
4
2
2
4
1
1
6
2
1
2
1
NO.
12
6
2
6
6
4
1
4
1
2
6
8
1
1
1
2
3
TOTALS
PERCENT
46 %
23 %
8 %
23 %
55 %
36 %
9 %
57 %
14 %
29 %
38 %
50 %
6 %
6 %
17 %
33 %
50 %
-------
-73-
APPENDIX C.3: PETROLEUM REFINING (SIC CODE 2911)
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Selenastrum
capricornutum
96h chronic
DPT ATTUF
IvCj l-if\ L X v C»
TOXIC I TY
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NUMBER
AR LA
2 6
3
2 1
2
2
1
OF SAMPLES
OK TX
6 5
2
2
1
1
' 1 1
1
1
1
NO.
19
5
2
1
4
4
3
1
TOTALS
PERCENT
72 %
19 %
7 %
3 %
33 %
33 %
25 %
8 %
50 %
50 %
-------
-74-
APPENDIX C.4: PLATING AND POLISHING (SIC CODE 3471)
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Cyprinodon
variegatus 8d
chronic
DUT ATTUF
TOXICITY AR
NONTOXIC 3
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW 3
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
LA OK TX
2 2
1
2 2
2
2 1
1
1
NO.
7
1
4
5
3
1
1
TOTALS
PERCENT
58 %
8 %
33 %
63 %
38 %
50 %
50 %
-------
-75-
APPENDIX C.5: MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS (SIC CODE 4952)
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Ceriodaphnia
dubia 7d
chronic
Selenastrum
capricornutum
96h chronic
RELATIVE
TOXIC I TY
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM .
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
AR
6
1
1
5
4
1
2
2
1
1
LA NM
3
2
5 3
1
1
1
1
3
OK
9
1
2
6
3
2
2
1
1
TX
7
2
3
26
3
2
3
2
1
1
3
NO.
25
6
6
45
7
9
7
4
3
1
2
2
7
TOTALS*
PERCENT TAD
30 %
7 % 1
7 %
55 % 6
26 %
33 % 3
26 % 5
15 % 1
100 % 1
8 %
17 %
17 %
58 % 3
DNT CND
1 1
6
4
1 1
1
2
1
2
*TAD=NUMBER OF EFFLUENT SAMPLES TOXIC AFTER DECHLORINATION
DNT=NUMBER OF DECHLORINATED EFFLUENT SAMPLES NOT TESTED FOR TOXICITY
CND=NUMBER OF SAMPLES WHERE TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE WAS NOT DETECTED
-------
-76-
APPENDIX C.6: FEDERAL FACILITIES (SIC CODE 9711)
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
OUT ATTT7U
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
TOXIC I TY AR
NONTOXIC 2
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW I
MEDIUM
HIGH
LA OK TX NO.
2 37
1 1
6
1 35
1 1
2 2
TOTALS*
PERCENT TAD DNT CND
50 %
7 % 1
43 % 1
63 % 2 1 2
13 % 1
25 % 1
*TAD=NUMBER OF EFFLUENT SAMPLES TOXIC AFTER DECHLORINATION
DNT=NUMBER OF DECHLORINATED EFFLUENT SAMPLES NOT TESTED FOR TOXICITY
CND=NUMBER OF SAMPLES WHERE TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE WAS NOT DETECTED
------- |