BRIEFING NOTES -

    A  STATUS REPORT ON  SULFUR OXIDES
    U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
     Office of Research and Development
   National Environmental Research Center
Research  Triangle  Park, North Carolina 27711
                April 1974

-------
                                                           600S74001
                   BRIEFING NOTES-
          A STATUS REPORT ON SULFUR  OXIDES
J.F. Finklea, D.B.  Turner,  G.G.  Akland,  R.I.  Larsen,
          V. Hasselblad,  and S.D.  Shearer
       U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
        Office of Research and Development
      National Environmental  Research Center
   Research Triangle Park, North  Carolina  27711
                    April 1974

-------
                                SUMMARY
     Fuel oils and coals contain varying amounts of organic and inorganic
sulfur that is oxidized to sulfur dioxide or sulfur trioxide during
combustion.  In the atmosphere these oxides are transformed into acid-
sulfate aerosols including sulfuric acid and sulfate salts that may be
transported for long distances.  Acid-sulfate aerosols cause adverse
effects on human health, vegetation, materials and visibility.  Acid
aerosols are especially vexing respiratory irritants because their
small particle size allows deep penetration into the lung.  Sulfates
of natural origin, from soil or sea spray, are probably larger, less
irritating particles.

     Adverse effects on public health include aggravation of asthma,
increases in deaths and aggravations of illness among the elderly and
infirm.  Healthy individuals can also be adversely affected as they
will experience substantial increases in the frequency of chronic
bronchitis symptoms and the occurrence of acute lower respiratory
infections.

     Recent reductions of sulfur dioxide emissions in major cities
have not controlled urban levels of acid-sulfate aerosols.  Local
urban sources of acid-sulfate aerosols may be well controlled but
imported acid-sulfate aerosols arising from increasing emissions of
sulfur oxides from distant power plants that burn high-sulfur fuels
are now intruding into northeastern urban areas.

     Massive conversion of urban power plants to high sulfur fuels or
unrestricted use of tall stacks and supplementary control systems can
greatly aggravate the acid-sulfate aerosol problem.  Flue gas de-
sulfurization, cleaner fuels or modified combustion processes will be
required to control the acid-sulfate aerosol problem.  Expected growth
in coal-fired steam electric power generation must be accompanied by
increased availability of cleaner fuels or widespread use of effluent
controls to avoid further aggravation of the acid-sulfate aerosol
problem.  Likewise, equipping the majority of light-duty motor vehicles
with oxidation catalysts would measurably increase human exposure to
acid-sulfate aerosols.  Control of these mobile source emissions may
prove mandatory if public health is to be protected.

-------
                 TWELVE QUESTIONS ABOUT SULFUR OXIDES



WHY CONTROL SULFUR OXIDES?


HOW ARE EMISSIONS OF SULFUR OXIDES CHANGING?


HOW HAVE SULFUR DIOXIDE AND ACID-SULFATE AEROSOL LEVELS CHANGED?
ARE ACID-SULFATE AEROSOLS TRANSPORTED FROM ONE AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
TO ANOTHER?
WHAT ARE THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AMBIENT LEVELS OF ACID SULFATE AEROSOLS
AND SULFUR DIOXIDE?
WILL CONVERSION OF URBAN POWER PLANTS TO HIGH SULFUR FUELS CHANGE ACID-SULFATE
AEROSOL LEVELS?
WILL GROWTH IN ELECTRICAL POWER DEMANDS CHANGE ACID SULFATE AEROSOL LEVELS?
WHAT IS THE PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE OF*PROJECTED CHANGES IN ACID-SULFATE
AEROSOL LEVELS?
HOW MUCH MUST SULFUR OXIDES EMISSIONS BE CONTROLLED?


WHAT KINDS OF CONTROL TECHNOLOGY ARE BECOMING AVAILABLE?
HOW WILL THE INTRODUCTION OF VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH OXIDATION CATALYSTS
ALTER EXPOSURE AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS?
WHAT IMPORTANT CAVEATS MUST BE KEPT IN MIND?

-------
               WHY CONTROL SULFUR OXIDES?

•  Industrialized nations will utilize increasing amounts of
    fossil fuels for at least another decade.
•  Without controls inorganic and organic sulfur in fossil  fuels
    will be emitted as sulfur dioxide or sulfur trioxide.
*  Sulfur dioxide is transformed in the atmosphere into acid-sulfate
    aerosols (acids and sulfate salts).
•  Acid-sulfate aerosols are fine particulates which have a relatively
    long atmospheric residence and which are capable of penetrating
    deeply into the respiratory tract.
•  Acid-sulfate aerosols adversely affect human health,  vegetation,
    materials, and visibility.

-------
3.0 r
             (Number
  .001
.01        .1         1         10
   PARTICLE DIAMETER, MICRONS
     ["  COAGULATION"
          •V.L
                       ^SEDIMENTATION
          Typical particulate distribution

-------
          HOW ARE EMISSIONS OF SULFUR OXIDES CHANGING?
HOW HAVE SULFUR DIOXIDE AND ACID-SULFATE AEROSOL LEVELS  CHANGED?
    "  Between 1960 and 1970 emissions in major cities  decreased  by
       roughly 50%.
    *  Ambient levels of sulfur dioxide in major cities  decreased  proportionately.
       Suspended sulfates, a proxy for acid-sulfate aerosols,  first
       decreased a little and then leveled off.
    •  Reductions in urban emissions and ambient levels  of sulfur  dioxide
       were primarily achieved by switching industrial sources  and
       steam electric power plants to low-sulfur fuels.
    *  Reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions  from strike-bound  smelters
       outside western cities reduced acid-sulfate aerosol  levels  in
       cities and improved visibility.

-------
     35
     30
• TOTAL (EPA)

•POWER PLANTS (EPA)

A NFS
tn
g
     10
           1940
                                                    Annual sulfur oxides emissions.

-------
                                                      MAXIMUM 24-HOUR CONCENTRATION
                                                      QUARTERLY LINE          	
                                                      TREND LINE
        24-HOUR PRIMARY STANDARD (365)
             '
        \/  V"XN
          ANNUAL PRIMARY STANDARDS (80)
                                             n   ,   ,   ,-
5/1/68 COAL = 1'. S
     RESIDUAL OIL = lr. 5
     LIGHT OIL = 0.7',S
                            10/1/70 RESIDUAL OIL = fl.5'ปS
                                  LIGHT OIL = 0.4% S
10/1/71 ALLOIL=0*.3'. S
      COAL=0.2%S
  JPRE-1958 FUEL = 2.5% S|
           Comparison ol SOj trends al Bayonne, New Jersey, with regulations governing
percent sulfur content in fuel.

-------
Nationwide emissions of sulfur oxides increased by 45% because of
increased emissions from steam electric power plants.   Light-duty
vehicles contribute less than one percent of national  emissions.
Locating steam electric power plants burning high-sulfur fuels
outside major cities allows sulfur oxides to change into acid-
sulfate aerosols before air masses reach major metropolitan areas.

-------
          ARE ACID-SULFATE AEROSOLS TRANSPORTED
           FROM ONE AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
                       TO ANOTHER?
   Long-distance transport of aerosols  is  scientifically
   plausible, consistent with geographical  emissions  patterns  and
   supported by complimentary types of  evidence.
'  Atmospheric turbidity is greatest over the eastern  United  States
   but increases in turbidity are not limited to the immediate
   proximity of cities or sources.   Turbidity is largely due  to
   aerosols.
   Acid rainfall  shows both localized  "hot spots"  that  correspond  to
   increased emissions and generalized patterns  that  indicate  long-
   distance transport.

-------
                      D <  1 ton/kn>2
                      GJ    1-20 tons/km2
                            20tons/km2
Nationwide geographic variation in 862 emission density.

-------
                                      •ซar	^.1__   r___J&O
                                                   I      OMLJMOMA"        ^/l
 POWER GENERATION SIZE, NIW
  O  0-2,000
 O  2,001-4,000
      4,001-8,000
        1- 15,000
SHADED AREA INDICATES TVA POWER SYSTEM
                                           Location of major coal-and oil-fired power units, 1971.

-------
                                           ,	
                                           i"<>ซTM7>s;5"ซ"""
   *ฐ<--.
        7*—J--Tllrs/
                       O /---.
                    /          :<=<>r<ฃ;i3
SULFURIC ACID PLANT SIZE, T/day


 O  0-2,500


     2,501-5,000



     5,001-8,000
o
     8,001-21,500
Sulfuric acid manufacturing capacity, 1970.

-------
SYMBOL
mil
:••.•:••.•.•••.•:•.•.•.•


Hi
CONCENTRATION
RANGE, ppm $04
0.03 TO 0.865
0.865 TO 1.61
1.61 TO 3.14
3.14 TO 4.67
*
-------
                           14
Recent University studies show acid-sulfate aerosols may impact
a large area of the Mississippi Valley in summer.
Urban and non-urban National  Air Sampling Network stations  show
elevated annual average sulfate levels in the area bounded  by
Chicago, Boston, Washington and Cincinnati.

-------
Non-urban average sulfate concentration. ug/m3.

-------
                            URBAN SITE
                            NONURBAN SITE
                           7.0 - 13.0 pg/m3
                                                                      CTl
1970 sulfate concentrations, urban (jjg/rri3).

-------
                          17
        WHAT ARE THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AMBIENT
          LEVELS OF ACID - SULFATE AEROSOLS AND
                     SULFUR DIOXIDE?
'  Before 1967 sulfur dioxide levels and suspended sulfate levels
   at NASN stations were fairly well correlated.
•  Correlations were best (.5)  in western cities  without  photochemical
   problems and in midwestern cities from Chicago south to  St.  Louis.
*  Correlations were somewhat lower (.4)  in northeastern  cities,
   probably due to differences in fuels and imported sulfates  from
   sources outside the city.


*  After 1967 poor correlations were found in cities where sulfur dioxide
   emissions were controlled  and where acid-sulfate  aerosols  intruded.
*  Correlations remained good in western cities where imported sulfates
   are not as important.
*  The poorest correlations were found in cities  with major photochemical
   smog problems.
•  Correlations between total  suspended particulates  and suspended
   sulfates were good throughout the period of study  (1962 -  1970).

-------
                       18
          WILL CONVERSION OF URBAN POWER
        PLANTS TO HIGH-SULFUR FUELS CHANGE
           ACID-SULFATE AEROSOL LEVELS?
The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards of EPA evaluates
power plant conversions to coal on a case by case basis.
Limited variances thus far granted will increase 24-hour levels of
sulfur dioxide by 50 to 200 jjg/irr in the most impacted areas.
Rates for transformation of sulfur dioxide into sulfates in the
atmosphere can vary widely (1-20% per hour).
Assuming a 5% per hour sulfur dioxide to sulfate transformation
rate, a 24-hour increment in sulfates of 9 /ug/nr was estimated
for an arc of communities downwind-of New York-New Jersey power
plants scheduled for conversion to coal.  Worrisome sulfate levels
already exist in these communities.
Assuming that conversion to sulfate would take place in the
one kilometer high box covering the metropolitan area, an increase of
up to 15% in sulfates could follow variances already granted.  Massive
conversion to coal in urban areas could raise sulfate levels by 15
to 70% depending on how much sulfur dioxide is transformed into
sulfate.
Control of sulfur emissions from power plants and other urban
sources is necessary to control acid-sulfate aerosol exposures.

-------
                      19
      WILL GROHTH IN ELECTRICAL POWER DEMANDS
        CHANGE ACID-SULFATE AEROSOL LEVELS?
Location of new or expanded uncontrolled steam electric power
plants inside major metropolitan areas is most undesirable and
not very likely.


Both urban and non-urban acid-sulfate aerosol  levels in ambient air will
be increased at the rate of one to six percent per year if power
plants remain uncontrolled or if they rely upon tall stacks during
periods of good dispersion and fuel switching  during periods of
poor dispersion.
Other troublesome alternatives are less reliance on coal  and more
reliance on imported low-sulfur fuels and accelerated installation
of nuclear generating capacity.
A more rational course for the next decade is to utilize coal  cleaning
and flue gas desulfurization so that the sulfur oxides problem
will not worsen.

-------
                        20
     WHAT IS THE PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE OF
         PROJECTED CHANGES IN ACID-SULFATE
      AEROSOL LEVELS, EXCLUSIVE OF EMISSIONS
  FROM VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH OXIDATION CATALYSTS?
Changes in sulfate concentration at New York NASN Stations and at
the New York Residential Monitoring Stations of the EPA CHESS Program
were predicted.   Two kinds of increase of exposure will  occur.
First, exposures will be increased as a result of conversion
of sulfur dioxide to acid-sulfate aerosols  in  power plant  plumes.   In
residential areas sulfate levels might increase from 20 to 29
micrograms per cubic meter for 24 hours.
Secondly, sulfate levels over the larger metropolitan regions  would
increase as a result of conversion of urban power plants to coal  and
growth in sulfur oxide emissions from more distant steam electric
power plants.  The magnitude of this increase is more difficult
to ascertain but upper and lower boundary estimates can be made.

-------
                               21
    *  An upper boundary estimate for sulfate Increases that might
reasonably follow Increases In sulfur dioxide emissions can be calculated
by assuming the following:
    First, urban sulfur dioxide emissions will increase 15% with
limited conversion to coal and 50 to 75% with massive conversion to coal.
    Second, local emissions are relatively more effective contributors
to urban sulfates than distant emissions sources on a ton for ton emissions
basis.  Limited existing data suggest local sources' are twice as effective
as distant sources.
    '  Third, urban sulfates will Increase at the rate of 2 1/2% per year
from more distant sources through 1980.
    *  Under the upper boundary estimate, limited conversion to coal would
Increase annual averages of sulfate levels by 2 to 3 jug/m3 while full
conversion would cause increases of 7 to 16 jug/m3.  To this would be
added annual increments of 0.5 jjg/nr from distant sources.

-------
                              22
    •  A lower boundary estimate assumes that at least half of urban
sulfate (8-12 iig/m3) is imported, that conversion of power plants
to coal would only affect sulfates of local origin and that this increment
will correspond to 5 percent of the predicted increase in ambient sulfur
dioxide over a wide area.  Sulfur dioxide increases range from 15
-------
                                 23
    *  Upper and lower boundary increments were used to calculate expected
frequency distributions for ambient sulfate levels at central  city and
residential stations.
    •  Prediction equations were used to recapitulate sulfate exposures in
older health studies from sulfur dioxide and total  suspended
particulate exposures.  Dose response relationships for long-term and
short-term sulfate exposures were estimated but these should be viewed as
best judgment not as precise statistical statements.

-------
                             Estimated Impact of Coal  Conversion in the New York - New Jersey Metropolitan Area*
Coal
Conversion
Limited



Full



Station
Central City
(NY-NASN)

Residential
(NJ)

Cental City
(NY-NASN)

Residential
(NJ)

Estimated
Base (1970)
Lower Boundary
Upper Boundary
Base (1971)
Lower Bounday
Upper Boundary
Base (1970)
Lower Boundary
Upper Boundary
Base (1 971)
Lower Boundary
Upper Boundary
S
Frequency Dist
10
12
12
14
6
6
7
12
13
20
6
7
10
20
12
12
14
7
7
8
12
14
22
7
8
12
30
16
16
18
8
9
10
16
18
28
8
9
15
ulfate Concentration_^ujj
ributfon
40
16
16
19
10
10
11
16
19
29
10
11
17
50
20
20
23
11
11
13
20
23
35
11
12
20
60
21
22
24
13
13
14
21
24
36
13
14
22
70
24
25
28
15
15
17
24
29
43
15
17
25
/m3)

80
31
32
25
18
18
21
31
36
53
18
20
31
90
37
39
33
23
26
30
37
45
65
23
25
39
Max-'
imum
48
52
55
56
58
65
48
66
83
56
62
99
Arith-
metic
Mean ซ
22 '
23
26
13
13
15
22 g
26,
39
13
15
23 -.
*No provision mdde for increases  in  sulfate due to growth in emissions outside the urban area.

-------
                                 25
  RECAPITULATING 24-HOUR LEVELS OF SUSPENDED SULFATES FROM MEASURED  LEVELS
                              OF SULFUR DIOXIDE
Y            = 9 + .03x                             1959 -  1960  Nashville
 sulfate in             sulfur dioxide              Study (A=  .8)
   jjg/m3                   in
Y            = 9 + .05x                             1966 -  1967  NASN  data
 sulfate in             sulfur dioxide              from 8  inland  cities
   jjg/m3      .             in jug/m3                       (n=  .5)
  RECAPITULATING ANNUAL AVERAGE SUSPENDED SULFATE LEVELS FROM  MEASURED  LEVELS
                               OF SULFUR DIOXIDE
Y             = 9 + .04x                             Pooled NASN  data  from
 sulfate in              sulfur dioxide              NY City,  Chicago  and  New
                            in ug/m3                 Jersey -  1962  - 1967
                                                         (ซ= -6)

-------
                                      Threshold and Illustrative Health Risks

                                         for Suspended Sulfates  and Sulfur Dioxide
 Adverse Health
     Effect
Threshold Concentra-
tion and Exposure
Duration
                                                                    Illustrative Health Risk
    Definition
 Sulfate Level
    Sulfur Dioxide
      Equivalent
Increase in Daily
Mortality
 (4 studies)

Aggravation of Heart
and Lung Disease in
the Elderly
 (2 studies)

Aggravation of
Asthma
 (4 studies)
Excess Acute Lower
Respiratory Disease
in Children
  (4 studies)

Excess Risk for
Chronic Bronchitis

  (6 studies)
25yg/m  for 24 hours
or longer
9yg/m  for 24 hours
or longer
6 to lOyg/m  for
24 hours
13yg/m  for several
years
10 to 15yg/m  for
up to 10 years
2 1/2% increase in
daily mortality
50% increase in
symptom aggravation
75% increase in
frequency of asthma
attacks
50% increase in
frequency
50% increase in
risk
38yg/nr for 24 hours
48yg/m  for 24 hours
30p'g/m  for 24 hours
20yg/m  annual
 average
15 to 20yg/m  annual
average
600yg/m  for 24 hours
750yg/m  for 24 hours
450yg/m  for 24 hours
                                                                                                                         ro
                                                                                                                         en
100 to 250yg/nT
annual average
100 to 250yg/rrT
annual average

-------
                               27
    *  Current urban sulfate exposures are high enough to aggravate existing
respiratory illnesses and to increase mortality on the worst few days
each year.
    •  With limited coal conversion up to 50 days each year would
exceed the mortality threshold.   With full  conversion up to 150
days would exceed this level.
    •  In residential areas the expected increases in annual  average
sulfate exposures over a 10-year period .could cause chronic respiratory
disease to increase 150 percent in non-smokers and as much
as 50 percent in smokers.  Lower respiratory disease in children could
increase by 70 percent.  Again, these estimates are not precise.

-------
                                28
            HOW MUCH MUST SULFUR OXIDES EMISSIONS BE CONTROLLED?
    •  Estimates of the degree of control necessary can be made by using
observed natural background levels of sulfates as a base and assuming
that reductions in national sulfur dioxide emissions will be accompanied
by proportional reductions in sulfate emissions.
    •  Fifty percent control of all man-made emissions might protect healthy
individuals while over 90 percent control may prove necessary to protect
the most susceptible individuals.
    •  Current utility plans for flue gas desulfurization would reduce
emissions by roughly ten percent by 1977, but growth in uncontrolled sources
can easily offset this modest gain.


    *  Since acid-sulfate aerosols, not sulfates of soil and marine origin
are probably of greatest interest, calculations based on "sulfate" measurements
may somewhat overestimate the degree of control required.
    *  Because some sulfur dioxide to acid-sulfate aerosol transformation
mechanisms are not dependent on sulfur dioxide concentration, the necessary
control may be underestimated.

-------
                                      29
   1000
    100
1
 3.
 O
 ^-
 cc
o
o
ซ*
LJ_
_i
=j
LU

3
=3
o .
cc
      10
     0.1
     1960
            10% INCREASE FROM
            SELECTIVE SWITCHING
            FROM GAS AND OIL
            TO COAL
                                            25% DECREASE FROM MORE .EFFICIENT
                                            COAL CLEANING IMPL|MENTED OVER_
                                                    A10-Yr PERIOD
                            15 ug/nT HEALTH OF
                            HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS
                            ADVERSELY AFFECTEC
     Jil^^LC
 ^^n?^)^!/!!!^


1968
             1 pg/m3, BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION (MEASURED AT NONURBAN
             SITES IN IDAHO AND S. DAKOTA).

             PARTICULATE SULFATE ARITHMETIC MEAN CONCENTRATION EXPECTED
             AT 5TH HIGHEST PERCENTILE NASN URBAN SITE FOR A 3%/yr GROWTH
             RATE, WITH COAL CLEANING IMPLEMENTED OVER A 10-yr PERIOD AND
             WITH 95% AND 99% CONTROL IMPLEMENTED OVER A 30-yr PERIOD.
                  1970
1980
                         1990
2000
2010
2020
                                       YEAR
    Future impact of  sulfate control strategy based on high-level NASN
    24-hour annual maximum concentrations.

-------
                                      30
    1000
     100
ro
i,
 3.
o
      10

             10% INCREASE FROM
             SELECTIVE SWITCHING
             FROM GAS AND OIL TO COAL
                                             25% DECREASE FROM MORE EFFICIENT
                                             COALCLEANING IMPLEMENTED OVER A
                V 10ug/m3, ASTHMA AGGRAVATED AND
                  SYMPTOMS IN ELDERLY AGGRAVATED
                                                         2005
                  4ug/m3, BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION (MEASURED AT NONURBAN
                  NASN SITES IN IDAHO AND S. DAKOTA).
              PARTICULATE SULFATE ANNUAL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION EXPECTED
              AT 5TH HIGHEST PERCENTILE NASN URBAN SITE FOR A 3%/yr GROWTH
              RATE WITH COAL CLEANING IMPLEMENTED OVER A 10-yr PERIOD AND
              WITH 95% AND 99% CONTROL IMPLEMENTED OVER A 30-yr PERIOD.
      0.1
      1960
1970
198"
 1990

YEAR
2000
2010
2020
     Future impact of sulfate control  strategy based on high-level NASN
     annual average concentrations.

-------
                              31
           WHAT KINDS OF CONTROL TECHNOLOGY ARE
                      BECOMING AVAILABLE?
    •  There are three practicable current approaches - control  sulfur
content of fuel, remove sulfur oxides from effluent gases, and control
the emission of hydrocarbon precursors of photochemical oxidants which
may facilitate sulfur dioxide to acid-sulfate aerosol conversion in the
atmosphere.  All of these courses are being pursued.
    •  Flue gas desulfurization is being further improved.
    First, some of the current gas cleaning demonstration could be modified
to provide 90-95% efficient flue gas cleaning sulfur removal  for electric
utilities.
    Second, new control processes may provide better than 90-95% efficient
flue gas sulfur removal for electric utilities.


    Third,  flue gas cleaning for industrial combustion and major industrial
process emitters can be developed.


    Fourth, sulfate emissions from flue aas desulfurization systems are
thought intrinsically less irritating than acid-sulfate aerosols.
Furthermore, ground level concentrations of these sulfates are likely
to be much less than those observed from uncontrolled plumes.

-------
                              32
    *  Clean fuels are being developed and combustion processes modified to
produce less pollution.


      First, more efficient fuel desulfurizatlon techniques are being
sought.

      Second, coal conversion systems such as gasification and liquefaction
are being developed.


      Third, techniques to utilize lower sulfur fuels such as western coals
are being developed.


      Fourth, alternate nonpolluting energy systems such as fuel cells, solar
energy, geothermal systems and advanced combustion systems are being evaluated.


       Fifth, strategies to conserve clean fuels and energy are being structured.


      Sixth,, techniques for removing pollutants which may catalyze or
participate in secondary sulfate reactions are being developed.

-------
                    33
      HOW HILL THE INTRODUCTION OF VEHICLES
EQUIPPED WITH OXIDATION CATALYSTS  ALTER  EXPOSURE
  	AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS?"
 ฎ  Our present cars burn  gasoline  containing  sulfur
    and emit sulfur dioxide.
 •  This sulfur dioxide is  diluted,  dispersed,  and
    changed rather slowly into ambient sulfuric acid
    and sulfates which are  much more potent irritants
    than sulfur dioxide.
    Cars equipped with oxidation catalysts  will  emit
    sulfuric acid or sulfates directly,  thus increasing
    exposure to these pollutants along busy expressways,
    in urban street canyons, and around  complex  sources
    like shopping centers and large airports.
    Incremental acid-sulfate aerosol  exposures from
    catalyst-equipped cars will  be added to the worrisome
    levels of sulfate already present in most of our
    cities.
    The magnitude of acid-sulfate aerosol  exposures
    attributable to catalyst usage can be  estimated and
    compared to the previous upper and lower boundary estimates
    of incremental acid-sulfate aerosol  exposures attributable
    to conversion of power plants to coal.
 •  Use of catalyst-equipped cars for two model  years in
    a major metropolitan area such as New York will  increase
    acid-sulfate aerosol exposures by one-half to twice as
    much as limited conversion of power plants to coal  or by
    oner-sixth to one-half as much as massive conversion of
    power plants to coal.

-------
                        34
0  Together, these increments could cause up  to  90
   additional days to exceed the mortality threshold
   (25 jjg/m^) with limited conversion to coal.  Full
   conversion to coal could cause up to 150 additional
   days to exceed the mortality threshold.
   Annual average sulfate exposures in suburban areas
   would also be pushed over the threshold for adverse
   health effects and adverse effects in the central
   city attributed to long-term exposures would be
   exacerbated.
•  Use of catalyst-equipped vehicles for four model
   years in the New York metropolitan area will increase
   acid-sulfate aerosol exposures by nine-tenths to
   twice as much as limited conversion to coal or by
   one-third to one  and one-half times as much as
   massive conversion of power plants to coal.
   Together, these increments could cause up to 145 days
   to exceed the mortality threshold (25 yg/m3) with limi-
   ted conversion to coal.  Massive conversion would cause
   up to 70 additional  days to exceed this level.
•  Use of motor vehicles equipped with oxidation catalysts
   for more than four model years would further exacerbate
   the problem.
•  Acid-sulfate aerosol exposures associated with use
   of catalyst-equipped vehicles will be substantially
   less if fuel economy of new cars is improved above
   the projected 10 mpg average base, if the sulfur
   content of gasoline is reduced, or if 100% of the new
   vehicles are not catalyst-equipped but rely on other
   technology to meet emissions standards.

-------
                 35
•  Adverse health effects along busy arterial  thorough-
   fares will  be measurable within two to six  years
   without conversion of power plants to coal.
   In November 1973, the Administrator of EPA recognized
   the problem of unregulated emissions from catalyst-
   equipped vehicles and took the following steps.

        First, research was expanded and accelerated to
        better define the problem.

        Second, programs were instituted to monitor
        changes in air quality along traffic corridors.

        Third, control options including desulfurization
        of gasoline and promulgation of a particulate
        emission standard are being considered.

        Fourth, an annual report addressing health-related
        issues for the Congress will be prepared.

-------
                               36


        WHAT IMPORTANT CAVEATS MUST BE KEPT IN MIND?
    *  The answers to the preceding eleven questions are current best judgments
but they are clouded by significant scientific uncertainties involving
many key aspects of the sulfur oxides problem.  These have been dealt
with in some detail in previous technical reviews and briefing documents
that are public information.


    *  Interpretations of historical trends in emissions and air quality
are hampered by a very limited data base.  Indeed, our current monitoring
systems for sulfur dioxide, suspended sulfates, strong acids, precipitation
chemistry, trace metals, ammonia, and hydrocarbons are not adequate
to answer pertinent questions about the origin, transformation and removal
of sulfur oxide air pollutants.  Simultaneous monitoring in urban, suburban
and rural settings is required.


    •  Current measurements of suspended sulfates serve as a useful proxy
for acid-sulfate aerosols but measurements that delineate particle size and
chemical  composition are required for sulfur compounds and other aerosol
components.  Aerosols of natural and man-made origins must be
characterized and differentiated.
    *  The mechanisms and rates for the transformation of sulfur dioxide to
acid-sulfate aerosols in plumes and in the atmosphere are not well  understood.
Plumes from controlled and uncontrolled industrial  and power plant
combustion sources should be studied.
    '  Predictive models which will give needed precision to estimates of
long-range transport and the influence of emission height must be developed.


    *  More soundly based dose-response functions for the adverse effects
on public health and welfare must be developed.  Interlocking clinical,
epidemiologic and laboratory animal studies are required to reduce scientific
uncertainties about adverse health effects.  Carefully designed studies of
plant damage, material degradation, visibility impairment and climatic
changes are required to develop reasonable damage functions for adverse
effects on the public welfare.


    *  Control technology research must be enhanced in ways previously
discussed and the societal and environmental  impacts of these controls
carefully considered.

-------
                              37
    •  Sound societal judgments can be based only on a sound scientific
information base.  Failure to acquire the needed information will
lead to needless discord and likely to one or more national  economic or
public health tragedies.

-------
                               38
                          MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
•  Acid-sulfate aerosols represent a complex public health and regulatory
   problem.

•  Control  of sulfur oxide emissions from urban and rural  power plants will
   be required.

•  It is our best judgment that massive conversion of urban power plants to
   high-sulfur fuels and the use of tall  stacks with supplementary control
   systems  in rural  power plants will greatly increase sulfate concentrations
   and endanger public health.

•  Equipping vehicles with oxidation catalysts for several model years
   will  further aggravate the problem unless control measures are instituted.

•  Uncertainties in  our scientific information base will  foster major
   societal disagreements about the steps necessary to control the
   problem.

•  Scientific uncertainties are being reduced by research  programs but
   important information gaps will  remain for five to ten  years.

-------