EVALUATION OF AN AIR CURTAIN
HOODING SYSTEM FOR A PRIMARY
COPPER CONVERTER
ASARCO, Inc.
Tacoma, Washington
Appendices A through I
PEDCo ENVIRONMENTAL
-------
A-80-40
II-A-40
EVALUATION OF AN AIR CURTAIN
HOODING SYSTEM FOR A PRIMARY
COPPER CONVERTER
ASARCO, Inc.
Tacoma, Washington
Appendices A through I
by
PEDCo Environmental, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
Contract No. 68-03-2924
Work Directive 9
PN 3490-9
and
Contract No. 68-02-3546
Task Assignment No. 12
PN 3530-12
Project Officers
John 0. Burckle
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45220
and
Alfred Vervaert and Frank Clay
Emission Standards and Engineering Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
December 1983
-------
APPENDIX A
COMPUTER PRINTOUTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
A-l
-------
TRANSMISSOMETER RAW DATA AND OPACITY CALCULATIONS
Tables A-l through A-4 presents a tabulation of events
during each test and the corresponding optical density and cal-
culated opacity from the strip charts.
Figure A-l shows the relationship between recorder scale
units, output current in milliamps (mA) and optical density (OD).
The relationship between output current in milliamps and optical
density is linear. Using this relationship, any peak on the
strip chart can be converted to optical density by converting the
recorder scale units to milliamps and then to optical density.
Figure A-2 shows that the relationship between optical density
and opacity is logrithmetic.
The following example calculations illustrate the method
used to convert recorder scale units to single pass opacity for
transmissometer data presented in this report:
1. Recorder scale units to output current (mA)
mA = Recorder scale units * 5
mA = 25 * 5
= 5
A-2
-------
TABLE A-l. TRANSMISSOMETER OPACITY DATA
FOR JANUARY 18, 1983
Time
8:30
9:08
9:13
9:16
10:47-11:11
11:11
11:16
11:23
11:28
11:33
11:39
11:44
11:47
12:00
12:05
12:12
15:10
15:13-15:45
15:45
15:53
15:58
16:16
16:18
16:22
Operation
Calibration
Slag skim
Slag skim
Slag skim
Blow
Slag skim
Pour
Pour
Pour
Pour
Pour
Pour
Pour
Pour
Pour
Slag skim
Cold addition
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Slag skim
Matte charge
Matte charge
Matte charge
Optical
density
0.64
0.12
0.16
0.16
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.04
0.05
0.16
0.04
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.04
0
0.08
0.12
0.24
0.36
0.08
0.04
Single
pass opacity
52
13
17
17
0
5
9
13
5
6
17
5
9
9
5
5
5
0
9
13
24
34
9
5
A-3
-------
TABLE A-2. TRANSMISSOMETER OPACITY DATA
FOR JANUARY 19, 1983
Time
7:00
7:26
7:30-8:10
8:10
8:19
8:25
8:34
8:37
8:39
8:42
8:45-9:16
9:16
9:25
9:35
9:38
9:42
9:45-10:10
10:10
10:30
11:27
11:32
11:43-12:30
12:30
12:32
12:35-13:17
13:17
13:20
13:22-2:00
Operation
Calibration
Cold addition (shell slag)
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Slag skim
Matte charge
Matte charge
Cold addition (shell slag)
Cold addition (shell slag)
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Matte charge
Cold addition (shell slag)
Matte charge
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Charge scrap
Charge scrap
Blow
Charge scrap
Charge scrap
Blow
Charge scrap
Charge scrap
Blow
Optical
density
0.64
0.12
0
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.28
0.12
0
0.08
0.4
0.08
0.08
0.12
0
0.12
0.12
0.24
0.08
0
0.12
0.16
0
Chart
Single
pass opacity
52
13
0
13
13
13
13
13
28
13
0
9
37
9
9
13
0
13
13
24
9
0
13
17
0
illegible
Chart illegible
0
0
A-4
-------
TABLE A-3. TRANSMISSOMETER OPACITY DATA
FOR JANUARY 20, 1983
Time
7:20
8:25
8:40
8:55
9:10
9:27
9:45
9:48
9:52
10:02
10:04-10:47
10:20-10:46
10:47
10:50
10:55
11:00
11:11
11:12
11:15
11:17
11:18
11:20
Operation
Calibration
Matte charge
Matte charge
Matte charge
Matte charge
Matte charge
Matte charge
Cold addition (shell slag)
Cold addition (shell slag)
Matte charge
Blow
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Slag skim
Slag skim
Matte charge
Matte charge
Matte charge
Cold addition (shell slag)
Cold addition (shell slag)
Blow
Optical
density
0.64
0.28
0.32
0.12
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.56
0.68
0.08
0
Single
pass opaci
52
28
31
13
13
9
13
48
54
9
0
ty
Upset condition considerable
leakage reported. Peaks on
chart not interpreted.
0.04
0.08
0.02
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.04
5
9
2
9
5
5
5
9
5
Upset condition, massive
leakage.
i
smoke
A-5
-------
TABLE A-3 (continued)
Time
13:50-14:25
14:25
14:34
14:40
14:48
14:52
14:55
14:58
15:00-15:37
15:37
15:45
15:54
16:08
16:15-16:55
16:55
17:04
17:33-17:56
17:56
18:10
18:12
18:14
18:15
18:15-18:36
19:23-20:01
Operation
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Slag skim
Matte charge
Matte charge
Cold addition (shell slag)
Cold addition (shell slag)
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Matte charge
Matte charge
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Blow
Slag skim
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blow
Blow
Optical
density
0
0.4
0.28
0.08
0.12
0.04
0.12
0.12
0
0.24
0.24
0.04
0.04
0
0.12
0.12
0
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0
0
Single
pass opacity
0
37
28
9
13
5
13
13
0
24
24
5
5
0
13
13
0
9
9
9
9
9
0
0
A-6
-------
TABLE /T-4 . TRANSMISSOMETER OPACITY DATA
FOR JANUARY 22, 1983
Time
10:20
10:44
10:46
10:50
10:54
10:56-11:32
11:37
11:46
11:53
12:05
12:08
16:02-16:22
16:22
16:27
17:01-17:16
17:18
17:26
' 17:28
17:30
17:32
17:34
17:35-18:25
18:27
18:31
18:34
19:01-19:31
20:02-20:33
20:33
20:35-9:05
Operation
Calibration
Matte charge
Matte charge
Cold addition (shell slag)
Cold addition (shell slag)
Blow
Roll out
Slag skim
Slag skim
Slag skim
Matte charge
Matte charge
Blow
Slag skim
Slag skim
Blow
Slag skim
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blow
Scrap charge
Blister copper charge
Blister copper charge
Blow
Blow
Cold addition
Blow
Optical
density
0.64
0.30
0.30
0.23
0.12
0
0.20
0.60
0.52
0.24
0.12
0.12
0
0.32
Single
pass opacity
52
29
29
23
13
0
21
50
45
24
13
13
0
31
Crane cables blocked beam
0
0
Crane cables blocked beam
Crane cables blocked beam
Crane cables blocked beam
Crane cables blocked beam
Crane cables blocked beam
Crane cables blocked beam
0
0.28
0
28
Crane cables blocked beam
Crane cables blocked beam
0
0
0.48
0
0
0
43
0
A-7
-------
1UU
ft f\
90
Of\
V) 80
H
5 TO
I 7°
Wan
OU
<
O en
W 50
£ 40
O
CC
-------
(0
z
tu
Q
o
H
Q.
O
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
OPACITY. %
Figure A-2. Relationship between optical density and opacity:
A-9
-------
2. Output current to optical density (OP)
OD = 0utPut current - 2 mA x
J. O
OD = 5 mA- 2 mA
= 0.3
Note: 2 mA is subtracted because we have a 10 percent zero
offset. Therefore 2 mA is zero optical density.
Also, this is a double pass optical density, because
the light beam passes through the emission channel
and is reflected back to the transceiver.
3. Optical density to opacity (double pass)
Opacity = 1 - 10~OD
= 1 - 10'0-3
= 0.4988
4. Optical density double pass to opacity single pass
Opacity (single pass) = 1 - \J 1 - opacity (double)
1 - 0.4988
= 0.292
% opacity = 0.292 x 100
= 29
Note: Single pass opacity may also be calculated by divid-
ing double pass optical density by 2 and using only
Equation 3 above.
A-10
-------
EXAMPLE TRANSMISSOMETER STRIP CHART
A-ll
-------
A-12
-------
A-13
-------
* ! I 40 i • ' , ' 60 ! i i
A-14
-------
S02 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Strip Chart Reduction
Maximum S02 concentration = A x Rf
A y Pf y R
Average S02 concentration = " * *T * D
for merged peaks = .xAiiBii )Rf
S02 emitted, Ib/h =
A x Rf x B x 0 59 x 1Q-9 Ib/mol g. 0? Jb _ Q . f
C x ^-by x 1U dscf x ppm x M>u/ Ib mol. x g ascT x
_q
emitted, Ibs = A x Rf x B x 2.59 x 10 x 64.07 x Q x 4 min/div.
Nonemclature:
A = maximum peak height, 1 division equivalent to 0.02 inch
B = peak width at 1/2 height, divisions
C = peak base, divisions
Q = average flow rate; 126,924 dscfm for high flow mode
76,359 dscfm for low flow mode
Rf = calibrated chart response factor, ppm/division
A-15
-------
STACK VELOCITY DA1A
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBEH
ASARCO
01/18/83
NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-6
CLOCK TIME
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP
1508
3CHEFFEL
. (DEG.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 39.93
STATIC PRESS
.(IN H20) -3.00
MOLECULAR HEIGHT 20.73
STACK INSIDE
OIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .64
MOISTURE CONTENT(X) 1.00
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
-01
-02
•03
-0«
•05
•06
0-01
D-02
0-03
0-0«
0-05
0-06
POSITION VELOCITY
INCHES HEAD
(IN H20)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.200
.400
.400
.200
.200
.100
.100
.400
.500
.400
.500
.300
STACK
TEMP
(DeG.F)
56.
56.
56.
56.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
AVERAGE
1.30A
57.
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/18/63
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SkCONDARV EXHAUST
RUN NUHBEH V-b
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.655
STACK ABS. PRES., IN H6. 29.71
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE* OE6.F 57.
SORTtVEL MD X STACK TEMP ABS) 26.0
STACK CAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 63.8
STACK GAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM. 75181.5
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRY), ACT. CFM. 74429.7
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(DRY) 75527.0
(HE!) 76289.9
!
M
~J
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS:
ARE* CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SO Ft
BPRES BAROMEIHIC PHF.SSURt. IN HG
DELP DELTA H
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK. IN
DIMI LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
OIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MUISTUHE CONTENT
MH MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMHER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BH MOLE FRACTION HATER VAPOR
PTC PHOT TUBE COEFFlCtNT
SPHtS STA1IC PHF.SSURE, IN H20
STtMP STACK TEMPEPATUPt, DEG F
STHHES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVFL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
IKMP IEMPERATURE, DEG F
VH VFLOCITY MtAD, IN H20
SVOLFLH STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOH (HET), ACFM
VOLFLH VOLUMETRIC FLOH IHfcT), ACFM
SVOLFLD STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOH (D«Y), OSCFM
I
M
00
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM(SORT (VH * TEMPI I 311.b
OELP a — ——-—------- a z 26.0
NP \^
STPRES = BPRES + (SPRES/t3.6) = £9.93 + ( -3.UU/13.6) = 89.7 IN HG
SOM(STEMPI 660.
8TENP « = — = 57. OEG F
NP \i
3.1416 • (OIA/2)**2 3.1416 * ( 60.000/2)**2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) s -. x -— s 19.635 SO FT
144 144
85.49 • PTC • OELP 85.49 * .84 • 36.0
STVEL « .—-.. —— s ....................... s 63.8 AFPM
SORTIMH * STPKES) SORT! 28.73 * 29.7 I
VOLFLN * 60. • STVEL * ARE* s 60. * 63.8 * 19.635 = 75181.5 ACFM
SVOLFLH * VOLFLH • STPRES • ( 460. * 68. ) 75181.5 • 29.7 * ( 460. * b8. )
. . = . . . s 76289.9 ACFM
29.92 • ( 3TEMP » 460. ) 29.92 • ( 56.7 * 460. J
SVOLFLD - SVOLFLH • (1 - BH) * 76289.9 • (1 - .01) s 75527.0 DSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DA1A
«£>
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBEk
ASARCO
01/12/83
NO a SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-/
CLOCK TIME 151?
OPERATOR SCHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (DE6.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN MG) 29.93
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20) -3.0U
MOLECULAR NEI6HT 28.73
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .64
MOISTURE CONTENT(I) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION V
POINT INCHES
NO.
0-01 .0
0*02 .0
0=03 .0
0-0« .0
0-05 .0
0-06 .0
-01 .0
-02 .0
-03 .0
-04 .0
-05 .0
-06 .0
VELOCITY
HEAD
IN H«?0)
.100
.400
.500
.500
.400
.100
.100
.300
.300
.200
.800
.100
STACK
TEMP
(OEG.F )
57.
5T.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
AVERAGE
1.258
57.
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/12/83
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-7
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES., IN H6. 39.71
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG.F 57.
38RT(VEL HD X STACK TEMP APS) 25.5
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS t>8.6
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM. 73740.4
STACK GAS VOLUME (ORT), ACT. CFM. 73010.9
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 89.92 IN. HG AND 66 06. F :
(DRV) 74039.5
(WET) 74787.4
I
to
o
-------
SAMPLt CALCULA1 1UNS
SYMBOLS:
ARE* CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK ARtA, S(J FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PHFSSURE, IN HG
UELP OELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
OIMI LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 N10TH OF RECTANGULAR S1ACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAH HEIGHT
NP NUMBER UF THAVLHSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION HATER VAPOH
PTC PHUT tUHE CUEFF1CENT
SPHtS STATIC PKESSUHt. IN H20
STtMP STACK TtMPtWATUWE, OEK F
STPHES STACK PHESSUNE, IN Hb
STVEL STACK VELIICITT, AFPM
TEMP TEMPtRATURE, DEG F
VH VELOCITY HtAU. IN H?V
SVULfLH STANUAHO VULUMtTHIC FLUM (NET), ACFM
VOLFLrt WOLUMETHIC FLOW (HtT), ACFM
bVULf-LU S1ANUAHU VOLUMETKIC FLON (DRY), USCFM
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS!
SUMISORTIVH * TEMPI! 305.6
OELP a —. x z 25.5
NP 18
STPRES = BPRES » (3PRES/I3.6) = 29.93 * ( -3.00/13.b) = 29.7 IN HG
SUM13TEMPJ fcftQ.
STEMP * ———----- s — — - — --- : 57. DEG F
NP 12
3.1416 * (DIA/2)**2 3.1416 • ( 60.000/2)**2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) = = = 19.635 SO FT
144 144
65.49 * PTC * OELP 85.49 • .94 * 25.5
STVEL « - — --- — — --- a ................ s b2.b AFPM
SORT(MM * SIPKESJ SORT ( 26.73 * 29.7 I
VOLFLM * bO. * STVEL • AREA = 60. • 62.6 * 19.635 = 73748.4 ACFM
SVOLFLM * VOLFLH • S1PRE3 • ( 460. » 68. ) 73746.4 • 29.7 • ( 460. + 68. )
. . — s -. — = 74767.4 ACFM
29.9? • ( STEMP » 4bO. ) 29.9? • ( S7.0 * 4Mt. )
SVOLFLO » SVOLFLW * (1 - BH) = 747B7.4 * (1 - .01) = 74039.5 OSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY UAlA
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCU
01/12/83
NO 4 StCONOARY EXHAUS1
CLOCK TIME 1523
OPERATOR SCHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 29.93
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20) -2.70
MOLECULAR HEIGHT 28.73
STACK INSIDE OIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTCNT(X) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION V
POINT INCHES
NO.
C-OI .0
C-0* .0
> C-03 .0
' C-0« .0
to C-05 .0
C-Ofc .0
0-01 .0
0-02 .0
D-03 .0
0-04 .0
D-05 .0
0-06 .0
AVERAGE 1
VELOCITY
HEAD
[IN H20)
.100
.400
.300
.300
.200
.200
.100
.500
.400
.500
.500
.300
.317
S1ACK
TfcMP
(OEG.F)
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
5T.
57.
58.
58.
5T.
-------
I
M
U)
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/12/83
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 StCONUARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-H
STACK AREA, 30. FT. 19.635
STACK ASS. PRE3., IN H6. 29.73
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE. DEG.F 57.
SORT(VEL HO X STACK TEMP ABS) 26.1
STACK CAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS fca.O
STACK CAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM. 75427.4
STACK CAS VOLUME (DRY), ACT. CFM. 70673.1
STACK CAS VOLUME 9 29.9Z IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(DRT) 75757.0
(WET) 7h522.2
-------
SAMPLE CAI.CIILA! IONS
SYMBOLS:
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK ARtA, SQ Fl
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
UELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM] LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BN MOLE FRACTION MATER VAPOK
PTC PHOT TIIHE COF.FFlCtNT
SPUES STATIC PHESSURt, IN H20
STtMP STACK (EMPtHATURt, OEG F
STPHE3 STACK PRESSURE, IN H(i
SW.L STACK VtLOCITY, AFPM
IEMP Tt.MPbRATURE, PEG F
VH VELOCIIT MtAO, IN H20
SVULFLn STANDARD VULIIMtTwIC FLOW (MET), ACFM
VULFLW VOL'JMEtMIC FLOW IWtT), ACFM
SVOLFLO STANQARU VOLUMfcTRIC FLOW (URT), OSCFM
ro
•u
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM(SORT(VH • TEMPI I 31?.7
OELP * • = = 26.1
NP 12
STPRES = BPRES * (SPRES/1J.6) = a«».<»3 + ( -?.70/13.6) = £9.7 IN HG
SUMISTEMP] 696.
3TEMP * —— e = 57. OEG F
NP 12
3.1416 • (OIA/2)**? 3.1«l6 * ( 60.UOU/2)**2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) = = = 19.635 SU Fl
Ida 144
65.49 * PTC • HELP 85.49 • ,«4 * 26.1
STVEL = ——— ——— — — « ---—— ——- ——— s fcq.O AFPM
SORT(MM * STPRES) SORT I 26.73 * 29.7 )
VOLFLW « 60. • STVtL • AREA s 60. * 64.0 • 19.635 = 75427.0 ACFM
SVOLFLM = VOLFLN • STPRES * ( 460. + 68. ) 75427.4 • 29.7 • ( 460. • 68. )
s = 76522.2 *CFM
29.92 * ( STEMP * 060. ) 29.92 • ( 57.2 * 460. )
SVOLFLO « SVOLFLM • (1 - HW) = 76522.2 • (1 - .01) = 75757.0 OSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITT UATA
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO
01/12/83
NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
CLOCK TIME 1529
OPERATOR SCHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (OE6.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 29.93
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20) -2. 70
MOLECULAR HEIGHT 28.73
STACK INSIDE OIM(IN) bO.OOO
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .Bfl
MOISTURE CONTENT(J) 1. 00
>'
1
to
(J1
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
0-01
0-02
D-03
0-0«
0-05
0-06
C-01
C-OZ
C-03
C-0«
C-05
C-06
POSITION VELUCITT
INCHES HEAD
(IN H80)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.100
.500
.600
.700
.600
.500
.100
.300
.100
.300
.200
.200
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
57.
57.
57.
58.
58.
58.
57.
58.
58.
58.
58.
5«.
AVERAGE
1.392
58.
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/I2/B3
SAMPLING LOCATION NO Q SECONDARY EXHAUS1
RUN NUMBER V-9
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES.» IN HG. 29.73
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE, OEG.F 56.
90RT(VEL HO X STACK TEMP ABS) 26.0
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 65.7
STACK GAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM. 77453.3
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRY), ACT. CFM. 76677.6
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. HG AND 68 OG. F :
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLSI
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SU FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN MG
DELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 NIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION (WATER VAPOR
HTC PITOT TUBE CUEFMCENT
SPUES STATIC PRESSURE. IN H20
SltMP STACK TEMPERATURE, DEC F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TEMPERATURE, PEG F
VH VILOCITY HEAD, IN M20
SVOLFLN STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOW (*ET), ACFM
VOLFL* VOLUMETRIC FLOW IKET). ACFM
SVULFLO STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOte (ORY), DSCFM
NJ
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM[SORT IVH • TEMP))
DCLP » —— = • « 26.8
NP 18
STPRES f BPRES » (SPRES/13.6) a 29.93 + ( -?.70/IJ.b) = 29.7 TN HG
SUMISTEMP) 692.
8TEHP « « — = 58. OEG F
NP 12
3.1416 • (DIA/2)**2 3.1416 • ( 60.000/2)**2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) = = = 19.635 SO Ft
144 144
85.49 • PTC * DELP 85.49 • .84 • 26.8
STVEL * ———————— s ..........-........-._. s 65.7 AFPM
SORTIMN • STPRES) SORT I 28.73 • 29.7 I
VOLFLM e 60. * STVEL • AREA = 60. • 65.7 • 19.635 = 77452.3 ACFM
SVOLFLW « VOLFLH • STPRES • ( 460. * 68. ) 77452.3 • 29.7 • { 460. » 68. )
. . = . .. . s 785V0.6 ACFM
29.92 • I 3TEMP » 460. ) 29.92 • ( 57.7 * 460. )
SVOLFLO s SVOLFLH • (1 - B") s 78500.6 • (1 • .01) * 77715.6 DSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DATA
I
do
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO
Ol/ie/83
NO a SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-10
CLOCK TIME 1534
OPERATOR SCHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (DE6.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) Z9.93
STATIC PRESS. (IN H?0) -a. 70
MOLECULAR HEIGHT ZA.7J
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN) feO.OOO
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTENT(X) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION \
POINT INCHES
NO.
001 .0
C-02 .0
C-03 .0
C-04 .0
C-05 .0
C-06 .0
0-01 .0
0-OZ .0
0-03 .0
0-04 .0
0-05 .0
0-06 .0
VELOCITY
Ht»U
(IN H20)
.100
.400
.500
.500
.400
.aoo
.100
.300
.400
.300
.500
.400
STACK
TEMP
(UbG.F)
57.
57.
58.
58.
5t».
58.
58.
58.
58.
58.
58.
58.
AVERAGE
58.
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/12/83
SAMPLING LOCATION NO a 3E.CCNDAHY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-tl)
STACK AREA, 30. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRE3., IN H6. 29.73
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE. OEG.F SB.
SORTtVEL HO X STACK TEMP ABS) 26.3
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 64.7
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM. 76194.1
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRY). ACT. CFM. 75432.2
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(ORT) 76428.5
(WET) 77200.5
>
vo
-------
SAMPLt CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLSt
AREA CROSS-SEC I KJNAl STACK AREA, SI) FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN Hf,
DELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM! LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
D1M2 NIOTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MN MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BH MOLE FRACTION HATER VAPOR
PTC PHUT TUBE CUEFFlCtNT
SPRES STATIC PRESSURE, IN H20
sTtMp STACK TEMPERATURE, OEG F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVtL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP ffMPERATURE, OEG F
WH VELOCITY HEAD, IN H2o
SVULFLW STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLO*
VdLFLH VOLUMF.TRIC FLOW (HET),
SVOLFLU STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOW
(NET), ACFM
(ORY), OSCFM
W
Q
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM(SORT IVH * TEMP)I 315.9
OELP « = = 26.3
NP 12
STPRES * BPRES » (3PRES/1J.6) = 29.93 * I -2.70/13.6) = 29.7 IN MG
SUM(STEMP) 694.
STEMP « — a = 58. OEG F
NP 12
3.141fe • (T)IA/2)**2 i.iaib « ( bO.OOO/2)**2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) = = = 19.635 SO Fl
144 144
85.49 • PTC * DELP 85.49 * .84 * 2b.3
STVEL s .———.—- — --- 3 ............. ....... = 64.7 AFPM
SORTIMM * STPRES) SORT I 28.73 • 29.7 )
VOLFLH = 60. * STVEL * AREA = 60. * b4.7 • 19.635 = 76194.1 ACFM
SVOLFLU s VOLFLH • STPRES * ( 460. * 68. ) 76194.1 • 29.7 • ( 460. » 68. )
= — . . r 77200.5 ACFH
29.92 • ( STEMP * 4bO. ) ' 29.92 • ( 57.8 * 4bO. )
SVOLFLO s SVOLFLH • (1 • BH) r 77200.5 • (I - .01) s 76428.5 OSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DATA
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASAHCO
01/13/83
NO a SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-l I
CLOCK TIME 1010
OPERATOR 3CHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 30.43
STATIC PRESS. (IN H?0) -3.00
MOLECULAR NE16HI ^«.7J
STACK INSIDE OIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTENT(X) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION \
POINT INCHES
NO.
0-01 .0
0-02 .0
0-03 .0
0-04 . .0
D-OS .0
0-06 .0
C-OI .0
e-02 .0
C-03 .0
C-0« .0
C-OS .0
C-06 .0
VELOCITY
HEAD
IN H£0)
.oao
.200
.400
.550
.650
.550
.150
.500
.450
.300
.300
.200
STACK
TtMP
(DEG.F)
59.
59.
59.
60.
60.
60.
56.
57.
58.
58.
S9.
59.
AVCRA6E
1.356
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/13/63
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-ll
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES., IN H6. 30.21
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE* OEG.F 59.
SQRUVEL HD X STACK TEMP ABS) 26.5
STACK CAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 64.5
STACK CAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM. 75976.6
STACK CAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM. 75217.0
STACK CAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. MG AND 66 06. F :
(DRV) 77311.2
(NET) 76092.1
U)
fO
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
STMBOLSt
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, S(J FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
OELP DELTA P
DIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM! LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 WIDTH UF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CUN1F.NT
MM MOLECULAR WEIGHT
NP NUMBER UF TRAVERSE POINTS
BW MOLE FRACTION WATER VAPOR
PTC PITOT TUBE COEFFICENT
SPHF.S STAUC PRESSURE, IN H2U
STtMH STACK IEMPERATUf
. .... s ae.s
30.43 » ( -3.00/13.f>)
59. DEG F
3.1416
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMtSORMVH * TEMPI)
OELP « -
NP
STPRES = BPRES » (SPRES/13.6)
8UMCSTEMP) 704.
NP 12
3.1416 '
144 144
85.49 * PTC • DELP 85.49 * .84 • 26.5
SQRMMN • STPRES) SQHTl 20.73 • 30.2 I
VOLFLM s 60. • STVEL • AREA s 60. • 64.5 * 19.635 = 75976.8 ACFM
3VOLFLW s VOLFLH * STPRES * ( 460. «• 68. ) 75976.8 • 30.2 • ( 460. » 68. )
29.92 • ( STEMP » 460. ) 29.92 • ( 58.7 •» 460. )
SVOLFLD = SVOLFLW • (1 - 8W) = 78092.1 • (1 • .01) = 77311.2 DSCFM
STEMP *
AREA1CIRCULAR STACK)
STVEL *
IN MG
60.000/?)**2
AFPM
19.635 SO FT
78092.1 ACFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DATA
U)
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBEH
ASARCU-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
01/13/83
04 SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-17
CLOCK TIME
OPERATOR
1 140
OF
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS.
(IN HG) 30.43
STATIC PRESS. (IN H30) -2. BO
MOLECULAR
HEIGHT ea.73
STACK INSIDE OIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE
COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTENT!*) 1.00
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
C-01
C*02
C-03
C-0«
C-OS
C-06
0-01
0-02
0-03
D-04
D-05
D-06
POSITION VELOCITY
INCHES HEAD
(IN H80)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.zoo
.300
.400
.300
.300
.000
.300
.400
.400
.500
.700
.300
STACK
TEMP
IDEG.F)
56.
56.
56.
56.
57.
56.
56.
56.
56.
56.
56.
56.
AVERAGE
1.348
56.
-------
PLANT ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
DATE OI/I3/H3
SAMPLING LOCATION «Q SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-17
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK AiS. PRES., IN H6. 30.22
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE* OE6.F 56.
SORTtVEL HO X STACK TEMP ABS) 26.3
STACK CAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 64.0
STACK CAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM. 75109.9
STACK CAS VOLUME (DRY), ACT. CFM. 70655.6
STACK CAS VOLUME 8 29.9? IN. HG AND 6$ 06. F :
(DRY) 77156.0
(KET) 77935.1
u>
U1
-------
SAMPLt CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS:
ARE* CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SI) KT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HI,
OELP DELTA P
01* DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM! LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISIUHE CONTENT
M* MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BN MOLE FRACTION WATER VAPOR
PTC PITDT TUBE COEFFICENT
SPUES SIATIC PHFSSURE, IN H20
SfhMp STACK TEMPERATURE, UEG F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN MG
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
IEMP 1EMPERATURE, OEG F
VH VELOCITY HEAD, IN H20
SVULFLW STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOW (NET), ACFM
VOLFLW VOLUMETRIC FLOW (WET), ACFM
SVOLFLO STANDARD VOLUMEThIC FLUW (DRY), 03CFM
>
to
STEMP •
26.3
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM(SORT(VH • TEMPI) 315.2
OELP » — =
NP 12
STPRES * BPRES + (SPUES/13.b) = 30.«J * ( -2.00/13.6) a
SUM(STEMP) 673.
........... 9 .......... s
NP 12
56. DEG F
30.2 IN HG
3.1416 * ( f>O.OOU/2)**2
3.1416 * (DIA/2)**2
...._.-...._..-.-_... s ...._.-..._.
144 144
85.49 • .84 * 26.3
...........__..__... s .........____........_. =
SORT(MW * STPRES) SORT I 20.73 • 30.2 I
VOLFLM * 60. • STVEL * AREA s 60. • 61.0 • 19.635 = 75409.9 ACFM
AREACCIRCULAR STACK) s
85.49 • PTC • OELP
STVEL s ............. ..
64.0 AFPM
SVOLFLM « VOLFLW • STPRES • ( 460. * 68. )
................................ s
29.92 • ( STEMP » 460. )
SWOLFLO * SVOLFLW • (1 - BW) = 77935.4 • (1 -
19.635 SO FT
75409.9 * 30.2 • ( 460. * 68. )
29.92 • ( 56.1 * 460. )
.01) = 77156.0 DSCFM
77935.4 ACFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DAT*
I
u>
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
01/13/83
•4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-18
CLOCK TIME 1144
OPERATOR OF
AMBIENT TEMP. (OE6.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 30.43
STATIC PRESS. (IN M20) -2.90
MOLECULAR NE1GHT 28.73
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN) bO.OOO
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTENT(I) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION \
POINT INCHES
NO.
0-01 .0
0-02 .0
D«95 .0
0-04 .0
0-05 .0
0-06 .0
C-OI .0
C-OZ .0
e-os .0
C-04 .0
C-05 .0
C-06 .0
/ELOC1TY
HEAD
(IN H20)
.200
.500
.500
.300
.300
.200
.100
.450
.400
.300
.300
.100
STACK
TEMP
(OEti.F)
55.
5b.
5b.
5b.
5b.
5b.
57.
57.
5b.
5b.
57.
57.
AVERAGE
1.304
5b.
-------
PLANT A3AHCO-1ACOMA, WASHINGTON
DATE 01/13/83
SAMPLING LOCATION «4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBEH V-18
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES.. IN MC. 30.28
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE. DEG.F 56.
SORT(VEL HD K STACK TEMP ABS) 25.9
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 63.2
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM. 74406.Z
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRY), ACT. CFM. 73662.2
STACK GAS VOLUME » 29.92 IN. HG AND 68 06. F t
(ORT) 760S6.0
(XET) 76654.5
I
Ul
00
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS!
ARE* CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AHEA. SO Ft
BPMES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
OELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
OIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
OIM8 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, 1M
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MN MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BN MOLE FRACTION NATER VAPOR
PTC PHOT TUBE COEFF1CENT
SPRF.S STATIC PRESSURE, IN H20
SltMP STACK TF.MPEMATURE, OE6 F
STPHES STACK PRESSURE, IN Hti
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TEMPERATURE, OEG F
VH VELUCIIY HEAD, IN H20
SVOLFLM STANDARD VULUMtTHIC FLU* (MET), ACFM
VULFLW VOLUMETRIC FLOW l*ET), ACFM
SVULFLO STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOW (DRT), DSCFM
U)
vo
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMISORTIVH • TEMPI) 311.0
OELP « = = 25.9
NP 12
STPRES = BPRES * (SPRES/13.6) a 30.43 + ( -2.90/13.6) = 30.2 IN HG
SUMISTEMPI 675.
STEMP « » = 56. DEG F
NP 12
3.1416 • (DIA/2)**2 3.1416 • ( 60.000/2)**2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) = = = 19.635 SO FT
144 144
85.49 * PTC • OELP 85.49 • .84 • 25.9
STVEL « • ——. s — — = 63.2 AFPM
SORT(MM * STPHES) 30MTI 28.73 • 30.2 )
VOLFLH • 60. • STVEL • AREA = 60. • 63.2 • 19.635 = 74406.2 ACFM
SVOLFLM B VOLFLM • STPRES • ( 460. » 68. ) 74406.2 • 30.2 • ( 460. + 68. )
. . . . = . . s 76854.5 ACFM
29.92 • ( STEMP «• 460. ) 29.92 • ( 56.3 » 460. )
SVOLFLD e SVOLFLH * (1 - BW) = 76854.5 * (1 - .01) s 76086.0 DSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DAT*
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
01/13/83
•4 SECONDARY FXHAUST
V-19
CLOCK TIME 1147
OPERATOR OF
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 30.43
STATIC PRESS. (IN H£0) -3.00
MOLECULAR HEIGHT ?H.73
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTENT(S) 1.00
>
1
•u
o
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
C-01
C-02
C-OJ
C-04
C-05
C-06
0-01
0-OZ
0-03
0-04
0-05
0-06
POSITION VELUCI1T
INCHES HtAU
(IN H?0)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.200
.400
.400
.300
.400
.100
.200
.400
.400
.300
.400
,3Ud
STACK
TEMP
(I)EG.F)
56.
56.
57.
57.
56.
56.
55.
55.
56.
56.
56.
56.
AVERAGE
1.3J7
56.
-------
PLANT ASAHCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
DATE 01/13/83
SAMPLING LOCATION *« SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUM8EK V-19
STACK AREA, 30. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES., IN H6. 30.21
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, OE6.F 56.
SORT(VEL HD X STACK TEMP ABS) 2b.O
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 63.5
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM. 74797.2
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM. 74049.2
STACK GAS VOLUME » 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(DRY) 76504.2
(WET) 77277.0
-------
SAMPLt CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS!
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK ARkA, SO Fl
BPRES BAROMETRIC PHESSUkE, IN HG
UELP DELTA P
DIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
01MI LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR WEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION WATER VAPUH
Htt PITUT 1UBE C.UEFFICENT
SPKFS StAllL PHESSURt, IN H20
STtMH STACK IKMPtHA 1UWt, UtG F
STPRtS STACK PRESSURE, IN Hli
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
IEMP TkMPtRATURE, DtG F
VH VELDCHV HEAU, IN H20
SVULFLW SUNUAHI) VULUMtTHIC FLOW (WET), ACFM
VOLFLW VOLUMETRIC FLOW (MET), ACFM
SVULFLU STANUAMI) VULUMtTklC FLOW (DRY), DSCFM
26.0
30.? IN HG
>
N>
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMfSORTtVH • TEMP)) 312.6
DELP * — = =
NP 12
STPRES = BPRES » (SPRES/13.6) = 30.43 * ( -3.00/13.6) =
SUM (STEMP) 672.
.......... s ..»..----- : 5b. DILG F
NP 12
3.1416 * (OIA/2)**2 3.14|(> *
144 1
SS.49 • PTC • DELP 65.49 • .64 • 26.0
.................... s .......................
SORTIMW * STPRES) SURTI 20.73 • 30.2 )
VOLFLN » 60. • STVEL • AREA = 60. • 63.5 • 19.635 = 74797.2 ACFM
SVOLFLW s VOLFLW • STPRES • ( 460. * 66. ) 74797.2 * 30.2 • ( 460. » 68. )
29.92 • ( STEMP » 460. ) 29.92 • ( 56.0 » 460. )
SVOLFLD = SVOLFLW • (1 - BW) = 77277.0 * (I - .01) = 76504.2 OSCFM
STEMP a
AREACCIRCULAR STACK) =
STVEL a
19.635 SU FT
63. 5 AFPM
77277.0 ACFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY 0*1*
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBEH
ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
01/13/63
*q SECONDARY EXHAUST
v-ao
CLOCK TIME 1151
OPERATOR OF
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 30.43
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20) -2.90
MOLECULAR WEIGHT 26.73
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .64
MOISTURE CONTENT(t) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION \
POINT INCHES
NO.
D-01 .0
D-02 .0
0-05 .0
0-04 .0
D-05 .0
D-06 .0
C-OI .0
C-02 .0
C-03 .0
C-04 .0
C-03 .0
C-Ofc .0
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN H20)
.100
.400
.500
.500
.400
.300
.100
.400
.250
.200
.250
.100
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
50.
55.
5t>.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
57.
AVERAGE
1.292
57.
-------
PLANT ASARCO-TACOMA, MASHINbTON
DATE 01/13/83
SAMPLING LOCATION »4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-30
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ASS. PRES.t IN H6. 30.22
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE* OE6.F 57.
SORT(VEL HD X STACK TEMP A93) 25.8
STACK CAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 65.9
STACK GAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM. 74050.7
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM. 73310.2
STACK GAS VOLUME 3 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F t
(DRY) 75665.8
(*ET) 76450.3
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS!
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SQ FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
DELP DELTA P
DIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
OIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
I) I Ma MIOTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION HATER VAPOR
PTC PHUT TUBE CUEFF1CENT
SPUES STATIC PRESSURE, IN H20
SUMP STACK TEMPERATURE, DEG F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TEMPERATURE, OEG F
VH VELOCITY HEAU, IN M2U
SVULFLM STANDARD VULUMETMIC FLUN (MET), ACFM
VtlLFLM VOLUMETRIC FLUM (MET), ALFM
SVOLFLO STANUARO VOLUMETRIC FLOM (DRY), OSCFM
**
Ul
25.8
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM(SORT IVH • TEMPI) 309.5
OELP « — - =
NP 12
STPRES = BPRES * (SPRES/13.6) = 30.03 » ( -2.90/13.6)
SUM(STEMP) 676.
............ s -....-.-.- z
NP 12
STEMP *
57. OEG f
3.1416 • (DIA/2)**2
3.iai6
30.2 IN MG
60.000/2)«*2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) s
19.635 SO FT
144 144
65.49 • .64 • 25.6
65.49 * PTC • OELP
STVEL « ........... . * .............. ...
SORT(MM * STPRES) SORT I 26.73 • 30.2 )
62.9 AFPM
VOLFLM « 60. • STVEL • AREA = 60. • 62.9 • 19.635 = 74050.7 ACFM
SVOLFLN « VOLFLM * STPRES • ( 460. * 66. )
...._......-..........._....-... s
29.92 * ( STEMP » 460. )
SVOLFLO e SVOLFLM • (1 - BM) s 76450.3 * (1 -
74050.7 • 30.2 * ( 460. * 68. )
• ••••^••••••••••••••••^•••••••••••v
29.92 * ( 56.S » 4bO. )
.01) s 75665.B OSCFM
76450.3 ACFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DAI*
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO-TACOMA, (WASHINGTON
01/13/83
«0 SECONDARY tXHAUST
V-21
CLOCK TIME
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP
1155
OF
. (DE6.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN H6) 30.43
STATIC PRESS
MOLECULAR ME
STACK INSIDE
.(IN H20) -2.80
I6HT 26.73
DIM(IN) 60.0UO
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .64
MOISTURE CONTENT(X) 1.00
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
C-OI
C-OZ
003
C-04
C-05
C-Ob
0-01
0-02
D-03
0-04
0-05
0-06
POSITION VELOCITY
INCHES HEAD
(IN H20)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.200
.400
.450
.400
.500
.250
.250
.450
.500
.400
.450
.300
STACK
TEMP
IOEG.F)
55.
56.
57.
57.
57.
57.
56.
56.
57.
57.
57.
5B.
AVERAGE
1.379
57.
-------
PLANT A3ARCU-TACOMA, HASH ING TUN
DATE 01/13/83
SAMPLING LOCATION «4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-21
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK AB8. PRES., IN H6. 30.23
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, OEG.F 57.
SQRT(VEL HO X STACK TEMP ABS) 26.7
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 65.0
STACK GAS VOLUME (WET), ACT. CFM. 76588.5
STACK GAS VOLUME (ORV), ACT. CFM. 75822.6
STACK GAS VOLUME » 29.92 IN. MG AND 68 06. F :
(ORT) 78273.5
(NET) 79064.1
.P.
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
3YMBOLSI
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SlJ FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HP,
DELP OELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM1 LENGTH OF REC1ANUULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR SIACK. IN
MOIST MUISTUNE CUNUNT
MM MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BN MOLE FRACTION MATER VAPOR
PTC P1TOT TUBE COEFF1CENI
SPUES STATJC PktSSUHE, IN H2U
STEMP STACK TEMPERATURE, OEB F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVfL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TEMPERATURE, OEG f
VH VELOCITY HEAD, IN M20
SVULFL" STANUAhU VOLUMETRIC FLU* (*F_T), ACFM
VULFLM VOLUMfTHir FLOn INET), ACFM
bVULFLU STANDAHU VOLUMETRIC FLOW (DRY), DSCFM
I
>U
00
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM [SORT I VH * TEMP)I 320.1
DELP » — s = 26.7
NP \i
STPRES « BPRES » (SPHES/l3.b) = 30.03 » I -a.80/13.b) = 30.2 IN HP,
SUM(STEMP) 6flO.
StlEMP = — e —— - = 57. DEG F
NP ia
3.1416 * lDIA/a)«*2 3.1416 • ( (>0.000/2)**a
AREACCIRCULAR STACK) = r r 11.635 SH FT
144 tan
85.49 • PTC • DELP 85.49 • .84 • 26.7
9TVEL » .....——.—. ——- = ..............—....... = fc^.o AFPM
SORT (MM • STPRES1 SORT I 26.73 * 30.2 1
VOLFLH a bO. • STVEL • AREA s 60. * 65.0 • 19.635 = 76588.5 ACFM
SVOLFLN • VOLFLN • STPRES • ( 460. * 68. ) 76508.5 * 30.2 • ( «bO. » 68. )
................................ = ... .....—....... .....—.... s 79064.1 ACFM
29.92 • « STEMP * 060. ) 29.92 • ( 56.7 * «bO. )
SVOLFLD = SVOLFLH • (1 - BH) = 79064.1 • (1 - .01) = 7H273.5 OSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DAT*
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO
01/14/83
NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-22
CLOCK TIME 1525
OPERATOR SCHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (OE6.F) 49.
BAR. PRESS. (IN H6) 30.36
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20) -3.00
MOLECULAR HEIGHT 28.73
STACK INSIDE DIH(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .64
MOISTURE CONTENT(I) 1.00
>
.tit
vo
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
0-01
0-02
Q-03
0-04
0-OS
0-06
c-ot
C-02
C-03
C-04
C-OS
C-06
POSITION VELOCITY
INCHES HEAD
(IN H20)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.200
.500
,700
.600
.900
.300
.200
.500
.500
.400
.300
.100
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
49.
50.
51.
52.
S3.
53.
51.
52.
52.
52.
53.
53.
AVERAGE
1.433
52.
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/14/83
SAMPLING LOCATION NO fl SECONDARY E.XHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-2<»
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES.f IN H6. 30.Oa
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE. OEG.F 52.
30RKVEL MO X STACK TEMP ABS) 27.0
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 66.0
STACK GAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM. 77767.6
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM. 76989.9
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. HG AND 68 06. F :
(DRY) 79751.7
(MET) 80557.2
en
o
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS:
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SO FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
OELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM? HIDTN UF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION MATER VAPOR
Pit PITUT TUBE CUEFF1CENT
3PKES STATIC PWESSURt, IN H2U
STtMP STACK TEMPERATURE, DEG F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TEMPERATURE, f>EG F
VH VELOCITY HEAD, IN H20
SVULFLW STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOM (MET), ACFM
VULFLM VULUMF.TRIC FLOW (WET), ACFM
SVOLFLD STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLUN (DRY), USCFM
>
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMI30RTIVM • TEMP)| 324.1
OELP « —• e e 27.0
NP 12
STPRES » BPRES * (SPRES/13.6) = 30.26 » ( -3.00/13.6) = 30.0 IN HG
SUMCSTEMP) 621.
3TEMP « — e — = 52. OEG F
NP 12
3.1416 • (DlA/2)**2 3.1416 * ( 60.000/2)**2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) s ----— - —- t — — — = 19.635 SO FT
144 Ma
85.49 • PTC • OELP 85.49 • .84 « 27.0
STVEL * .................... s ....................... z 66.0 AFPM
SORT(MM * STPRES) SORT! 28.73 * 30.0 I
VOLFLN « 60. * STVEL * AREA z 60. • 66.0 • 19.635 = 77767.6 ACFM
SVOLFLM s VOLFLM • STPRES • ( 460. » 68. ) 77767.6 • 30.0 * ( 460. » 68. )
. r = 80557.2 ACFM
29.92 • ( STEMP «• 460. ) 29.S2 • ( 51.8 » 460. )
SVOLFLD « SVOLFLW • (1 - BM) = 80557.2 • (1 - .01) = 79751.7 DSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DATA
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO
01/18/83
N04 SECONDARY EXHAUST
v-as
>
ro
TRAVER
POINT
NO.
01
02
03
0«
05
06
01
02
OS
04
05
Ob
CLOCK TIMt 0
OPERATOR SCHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (OE6.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN H6) 29.53
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20) -2.50
MOLECULAR NEI6HT ?8.73
STACK INSIDE OIM(IN) 60. QUO
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTENT(I) 1.00
SE POSITION \
INCHES
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
/ELUCITY STACK
HEAD TEMP
(IN H80) IOEG.F )
.900 5<».
.200 50.
.300 50.
.300 50.
.400 5-».
.400 0.
.100 57.
.300 58.
.300 58.
.400 5«.
.400 SH.
1.400 5H.
AVERA6E
1.283
53.
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/18/83
SAMPLING LOCATION NOO SECUNDAHY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-23
STACK AREA, 38. FT. 19.635
STACK A8S. PRES., IN H6. 29.35
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE* DE6.F 53.
SORT(VEL HO X STACK TEMP ABS) 25.6
STACK CAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 63.3
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM. 74616.0
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRY), ACT. CFM. 73069.8
STACK GAS VOLUME a 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(DRY) 74S3S.3
(*»ET) 75288.2
>
Ul
-------
SAMPLE CALLULAT1UNS
SYMBOLS!
ARE* CROSS-SECTIONAL S1ACK AHfcA, SO F1
BPRE3 BAROMETRIC PHtSSUHt, IN HG
UELP OELTA P
DIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
OIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIMS NIOTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
M* MOLECULAR WEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION MATER VAPOH
HIC PII01 IUHE CUFFFICtNT
SPHES S1A1IC PkESSUHt, IN M20
b!tMP STALK TEMPt»ATUHt, OEG F
STPHE3 STACK HHtSSURE, IN HG
STVF.L S1ACK VELOCITY, AFPM
ThMH 1F.MPEWATURE , OEG F
VM VtLDLIIY Ht«U, IN H20
SVULFLw SfANUAHO VULUMETHIC FLUW (w£T), ACFM
VOLFLW VIILUMEtHIC FLOW CWET), ACFM
SVUI.FLO STANOARO VOLUMETRIC FLUM (URT), OSCFM
>
Ul
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMI30RTIVH * TEMP)] 307.3
DELP « — * = ?5.b
NP 12
STPRES s BPRES » (SPRES/13.6) = 89.53 * ( -2.50/13.h) = 29.3 IN HG
SUMCSTEMP] 639.
SfEMP s * = 53. OEG F
NP 12
3.1016 * (DIA/2)**2 3.1416 • ( 60.000/2)«*2
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) s = = 19.635 SO FT
laa Ma
85.«9 • PTC • DELP 85.09 * .Bfl • 25.6
STVEL * ——-• e . — = 63.3 AFPM
SORT (MM • STPRES) SORT! 28.73 * 29.3 )
VOLFLN * 60. * STVEL • AREA s 60. * 63.3 * 19.635 = 74616.0 ACFM
SVOLFLM - VOLFLM • STPRES • ( 46U. » 68. ) 74616.0 * 29.3 • ( 46V. * 68. )
. ...... . = -. . . = 75286.2 ACFM
29.92 « I STEMP * 460. ) 29.92 • ( 53.3 « 460. )
SVOLFLD s SVOLFLH • (1 - B»O = 75288.2 * (1 - .01) s 74535.3 OSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DAT*
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO
01/19/B3
NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
v-24
CLOCK TIME 1404
OPERATOR DO
AMBIENT TEMP. (OEG.F) 46.
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG) 29.55
STATIC PRESS. (IN M20) -3.00
MOLECULAR HEIGHT 88.75
STACK INSIDE OIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .64
MOISTURE CONTENT(X) 1.00
TRAVERSE
>
1
Ui
Ul
POINT
NO.
01
02
OS
04
OS
06
01
02
OS
04
OS
06
POSITION VELOCITY
INCHES HEAD
(IN H20)
.0 .980
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.250
.300
.350
.400
.500
.860
.200
.300
.350
.500
.550
STACK
TEMP
(OtG.F)
55.
58.
60.
61.
62.
62.
60.
62.
62.
63.
63.
HO.
AVERAGE
1.295
61,
-------
PLANT A3ARCU
DATE 01/19/83
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUS1
RUN NUMBEK V-2«
STACK AREA, 90. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES., IN HG. 39.33
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE. DEG.F bl.
SORT(VEL HO X STACK TEMP ABS) Z5.9
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 64.U
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM. 7*446.a
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM. 74691.7
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(DRV) 74248.6
(WET) 74998.6
I
Ul
(TV
-------
SAMPLE CALCIJLA1 IONS
SYMBOLS:
ARE* CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK ARE*, SO FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN Hf.
OELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANbULAR STACK, IN
OIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION hATEH VAPOH
PTC PITOT TUBE COEFF1CENT
SPKKS STATIC PKESSURE, IN H20
SIEMP STACK TEMPERATURE, otc F
STPHES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
3TVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TF.MPERATURE, PEG F
VH VF.LUCITY HEAD, IN H20
SVOLFLW STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOH (NET), ACFM
VULFL* VOLUMETRIC FLOH (WET), ACFM
SVULFLU STANUAMD VULUMfcTHlC FLUW (URt), OSCFM
I
Ul
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMISORTIVH * TEMPI) 310.6
OCLP » —— = = 25.9
NP 12
STPRES = BPRES » (SPRES/13.6) = 29.55 » ( -3.00/J3.6) = 29.3 IN HG
SUM(STEMP) 728.
STEMP a — s —— 61. DEG F
NP 12
3.1416 • (DIA/2)**2 3.1016 • ( 60.000/2) ••<>
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) s — — —- = = 19.635 SO FT
14Q 144
85.49 • PTC • OELP 05.49 • .84 • 25.9
STVEL » — = = 64.0 AFPM
SORTlMh * STPRES) SIJHTl *8.M • 29.3 I
VOLFLH r 60. * STVEL • AREA = 60. • 64.0 * 19.63S s 75446.2 ACFM
SVOLFLM = VOLFLW * STPRES • ( 460. * 68. ) 75446.2 • 29.3 • ( 460. «• 68. )
... = . s 74998.6 ACFM
29.92 * ( STEMP » 460. ) 29.9? • ( 60.7 » 460. )
SVOLFLD = SVOLFLW • (1 - BW) = 74998.6 • (1 - .01) = 74248.6 DSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY 0»!»
>
00
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUHBEH
ASARCU-TACUMA, WASH 1 NUTUN
01/13/63
•4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
CLOCK TIME
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F)
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG)
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20)
MOLECULAR HEIGHT
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
MOISTURE CONTENT(t)
TRAVERSE POSITION
POINT INCHES
NO.
C-01 .0
C-OZ .0
C-03 .0
C-04 .0
C-05 .0
C-06 .0
0-01 .0
D-OZ .0
0-03 .0
0-04 .0
0-05 .0
0-06 .0
I04Z
0 FIT2GERALD
45.
30.43
•6.40
26.73
60.000
.84
1.00
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN H20)
2.900
4.000
3.600
3.500
3.600
3.600
3.100
3.900
4.400
3.700
4.000
3.600
S1ACK
TEMP
(OEG.F)
51.
53.
55.
55.
55.
5b.
52.
54.
54.
55.
55.
55.
AVERAGE
3.675
54.
-------
PLANT ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
DATE 01/13/63
SAMPLING LOCATION »4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-12
STACK AREA, 90. FT. 19.63%
STACK ABS. PRES.r IN HG. 29.01
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG.F 54.
S0RT(VEL HD X STACK TEMP ABS) 43.4
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 106.5
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM.I2547S.3
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM.124220.6
STACK GAS VOLUME tf 39.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(ORT) 127124.3
(MET) 126408.4
Ui
vo
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS!
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SO F1
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN MR
OELP DELTA P
01A DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
OIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
OIM2 MIDTH OF RECTANGULAR S1ACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR MIIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BN MOLE FRACTION HATER VAPOR
SHWES
STVKL
TEMP
VH
SVULFLW
VOLFLW
SVULT-LI)
HITUT TUBE CUEFFICfcNT
STATIC PRESSURE. IN H2U
STACK TEMPERATURt, OEG F
STACK PRESSURE. IN HG
STACK VELUCITY, AFPM
TEMPERATURE, OfcG F
VELOCITY HEAU, IN M20
STANUAHU VOLUMETRIC FLUM 5«. OEG F
NP 12
3.1016 * (DIA/2)**2 3.1416 * ( hO.OOO/£)**£
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) * - — -- — — -- z ...-. — -. = 19.635 SO FT
104 140
65.49 * PTC • DELP 85.49 • .94 * 43.4
STVEL » ——————— s .._......._ — ._........ s 106.5 AFPM
SORTIMM * STPHES) SORT I 20.73 * 29.8 )
VOLFLM s 60. * STVEL * AREA s 60. * 106.5 * 19.635 s 125475.3 ACFM
SVOLFLN a VOLFLM * STPRES • ( obo. •» 68. ) 125475.3 • 29.11 * ( 460. * 6«. )
.... . .... . s s 120408.4 ACFM
29.92 • ( STEMP * 060. ) 29.92 • ( 54.1 » 060. )
SVOLFLD s SVOLFLN • (1 - BM) = 128408.4 * (1 - .01) = 127124.3 DSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY OAT*
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
CLOCK TIME
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F)
BAR.PRESS.(IN HG)
STATIC PRESS.(IN H£Q)
MOLECULAR HEIGHT
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
MOISTURE CONTENT(S)
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
POSITION
INCHES
A9ARCO-TACOMA, HASHINGTUN
01/13/83
04 SECONOAHY EXHAUST
V-13
1048
OF
45.
30.43
•8.30
88.73
60.000
.04
1.00
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN H20)
STACK
TEMP
tOtG.F)
0-01
0-02
0-03
0-04
D-05
D-06
C-01
C-02
C-03
C-04
C-05
C-06
.0
.0
S0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
3.300
3.900
4.300
4.500
4.600
3.800
3.100
4.100
3.800
3.500
3.400
3.000
57.
55.
55.
55.
55.
55.
53.
53.
54.
55.
55.
55.
AVERAGE
3.7T5
55,
-------
PLANT A3AHCO-IACUM», WASHINGTON
DATE 01/13/83
SAMPLING LOCATION *t SECONDARY tXMAUS!
RUN NUMBER V-1J
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRE3., IN HG. 29.8?
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DE6.F 55.
SORTCVEL HD X STACK TEMP »BS) 44.U
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 107.9
STACK GAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM.127122.5
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM.125851.3
STACK GAS VOLUME » 29.92 IN. HG AND 68 DC. F :
(DRV) 128658.1
(WET) 129957.6
m
to
-------
SAMPLK CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS!
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SO FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
DELP DELIA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK. IN
DIM! LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 NIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR WEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION MATER VAPOR
HTC PHUT TUBF COEFF1CENT
SPUES STATIC PRESSURE, IN M2U
STEMP STACK TEMPERATURE, Otb F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
IEMP TEMPERATURE, DEC F
VH VELOCITY HfcAO, IN M2U
SVULFLW STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLO* (MET), ACFM
VOLFLM VULUME1H1C FLOW (MET), ACFM
SVULFLO STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLUM (DRY), DSCFM
FORMULAS ANO SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMCSgRTCVH * TEMP)]
OELP « — — --------- ........ - =
NP
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) 3
85.49 • PTC • OELP
STVEL a ..... .- z — ..
SORT (MM • STPRESI SORT! 28.73 • 29.8 )
107. •> AFPM
19.635 SU FT
VOLFLM s 60. « STVEL • AREA * 60. * 107.9 • 19.635 = 127122.5 ACFM
3VOLFLH « VOLFLN • 3TPRES • ( 460. » 68. ) 127122.5 • 29.8 • ( 460. » 68. )
...._..._.._._....__............ s ._._._....-....................... s
29.92 • ( S1EMP * 460. ) 29.92 * ( 54.6 » 460. )
SVOLFLO e SVOLFLM • (1 - BM) * 129957.6 • (1 - .01) = 128658.1 03CFM
129957.6 ACFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY UAIA
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBEW
ASARCO-TACUMA, WASHINGTON
01/15/83
»0 SECONDARY EXHAUST
CLOCK TIME
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEG.F)
BAR. PRESS. (IN HG)
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20)
MOLECULAR HEIGHT
STACK INSIDE OIM(IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
MOISTURE CONTENT(X)
TRAVERSE POSITION
POINT INCHES
NO.
C-OI .0
C-08 .0
C-03 .0
. C-04 .0
•? C-05 .0
cr. C-06 .0
*• 0-0» .0
0-02 .0
0-05 .0
0-0« .0
0-05 .0
0-06 .0
1052
OF
05.
30. a3
-B.au
2B.73
60.000
.64
1.00
VtLUCITY
HEAU
(IN H£0)
3.100
a. ooo
3.800
3.600
3.900
3.300
3.000
3.800
4.100
3.900
0.200
3.200
STACK
TEMP
(ntG.F)
53.
54.
55.
55.
55.
55.
52.
53.
54.
54.
54.
55.
AVERAGE
3.658
54,
-------
PLANT ASARCU-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
DATE 01/13/83
SAMPLING LOCATION «4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-IU
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES., IN H6. 29.83
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE, DEG.F 54.
SORTCVEL NO X STACK TEMP ABS) 43.3
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS IOb.2
STACK GAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM.125140.2
STACK GAS VOLUME (ORV), ACT. CFM.123896.7
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(DRY) UbflSS.4
(NET) 128136.6
a\
Ul
-------
SAMPLE CALCULAt IONS
SYMBOLS:
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SO FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PHESSURE, IN HP,
OELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM1 LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 MIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CUNlENt
MX MOLECULAR WEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION MATER VAPOR
SPRES
STtMP
STPRES
STVEL
TEMP
VH
SVULFLW
SVULFLD
P1TUT TUBE CUEKFICENT
STATIC PRESSURE, IN H20
STACK rtMPERATURt, DEC F
STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMPERATURE, OEG F
VELOCITY HEAD, IN M20
STANDARD VULUMfcTRIC FLOW (MET), ACFM
VOLUMETRIC FLO* (MET), ACFM
STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOW (URY), D3CFM
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM(SORT IVH • TEMPI) 519.6
DELP » —— = « 43.3
NP 12
STPRES = BPRES <• (SPUES/13.6) = 30.43 » ( -8.20/13.6) = 29.8 IN MG
SUM(STEMP) 649.
8TEMP * ——. s . . s 54. OEG F
NP 12
3.1416 • (DIA/2)**2 3.1416 • ( 60.000/2)«*2
AREAtCIRCULAR STACK) a a = 19.635 SO FT
144 144
85.49 • PTC • OELP 85.49 • .84 * 43.3
STVEL * = — = 106.2 AFPM
SORT(MM • STPRESI SORT I 26.73 * 29.6 I
VOLFLM a 60. • STVEL * AREA = 60. * 106.2 • 19.635 = 125148.2 ACFM
SVOLFLM c VOLFLM • STPRES * ( 460. » 60. ) 125148.2 • 29.8 • ( 460. » 68. )
. a .. . r 128136.6 ACFM
29.92 • ( STEMP * «60. ) 29.92 • ( 54.1 » 460. )
SVOLFLO s SVOLFLM • (1 - BW) = 128136.6 • (1 - .01) c 126855.4 DSCFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY OAU
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
01/13/83
•a SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-15
CLOCK TIME 1056
OPERATOR OF
AMBIENT TEMP. (OE6.F) 45.
BAR. PRESS. (IN H6) 30.43
STATIC PRESS. (IN H?0) -8.40
MOLECULAR HEIGHT 28.73
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
MOISTURE CONTENT(S) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION \
POINT INCHES
NO.
0*01 .0
D-OZ .0
0-03 .0
> 0-04 .0
d, 0-05 .0
•J 0-06 .0
C-01 .0
C-02 .0
C-03 .0
C-04 .0
C-OS .0
C-06 .0 !
/ELOCITY
HEAD
UN Heo)
.100
.000
.500
.700
.800
.800
.000
.800
.600
.500
.500
5.300
STACK
TEMP
(DtG.F)
52.
53.
54.
54.
55.
55.
52.
53.
53.
54.
55.
54.
AVERASC
3.883
54.
-------
PLANT ASARCO-TACUMA, WASHINGTON
DATE 01/13/03
SAHPLINC LOCATION 04 SF.CONDAHY kXHAUSf
RUN NUMBEH V-IS
STACK AREA, 90. FT. 19.635
STACK AB3. PRES., IN HG. 29.61
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE, DE6.F 54.
SQRTCVEL HO X STACK TEMP AB9) 40.5
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 10V.2
STACK CAS VOLUME (NET), ACT. CFM.128b8b.?
STACK CAS VOLUME (DRY), ACT. CFM.127398.4
STACK GAS VOLUME 9 29.92 IN. HG AND 68 UG. F :
(DRY) 130462.2
(NET) 131800.2
m
-------
SAMPLE C*LCUL*IIONS
SYMBOLS:
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SU FT
BPHES BAROMETRIC HkESSURE, IN HG
UELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIMI LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 MIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR WEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Bh MOLE FRACTION MATER VAPOR
PTC PHOT TUBF. COEFFICENT
SPHtS STATIC PHESSURt, IN M20
SUMP STACK TEMPERATURE, UtG F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
ItMP TEMPERATURE, OEG F
VH VELOCITY HEAD, IN M20
SVULFLM STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOM (MET), ACFM
VOLfLM VOLUMETRIC FLOW IMET), ACF*
SVOI.FLD STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOM CORY), DSCFM
o\
vo
oo.5
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM (SORT (VH * TEMPI I 530.2
DELP « -
NP 12
STPRES » BPRES » (SPRES/13.6) a 30.03 » ( -ft.00/13.6)
SUMISTEMP) 600.
NP 12
STEHP t
50. DEG F
29.fl IN HG
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) =
3.1016 • (DIA/2)**2
100
3.1016 * ( 60.000/2)***
100
19.63S SO FT
85.49 * PTC • DELP 85.09 • .80 • 00.5
STVEL « — ——— * — — — « 109.2 AFPM
SORT(MN * STPRES) SURT I 26.73 • 29.8 I
VOLFLN • 60. • STVEL • AREA = 60. * 109.2 • 19.635 * 128685.2 ACFM
SVOLFLN * VOLFLN * STPRES • ( 060. «• 68. ) 128665.2 • 29.8 • ( 060. » 68. )
29.92 • ( STEMP •» 060. ) 29.92 • ( 53.7 » 060. )
SVOLFLD * SVOLFL* * (1 - HM) = 131800.2 • (1 - .01) « 130082.2 DSCFM
131800.2 ACFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY DATA
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBEH
CLOCK TIME
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP. (DE6.F)
BAR.PRESS.(IN MS)
STATIC PRESS.(IN H20)
MOLECULAR HEIGHT
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
MOISTURE CONTENT(t)
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
POSITION
INCHES
ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
01/13/83
•4 SECONDARY tXHAUST
V-lb
1059
OF
45.
30.43
-8.20
28.73
60.000
.84
1.00
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN H20)
STACK
TEMP
(OEG.F)
C-Ol
C-02
C-03
C-04
C-05
C-06
0-01
0-02
0-OS
0-04
0*05
0-Ofc
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.500
.900
.800
.800
.500
.400
.000
.000
.000
.800
.900
.400
53.
54,
54.
54.
54.
55.
51.
53,
53.
54.
54,
55.
AVERAGE
3.667
54.
-------
PLANT ASARCO-TACOMA, WASHINGTON
DATE 01/13/03
SAMPLING LOCATION «« SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-16
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ASS. PRES., IN H6. 29.83
STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DE6.F 54.
3QRMVEL HD X STACK TEMP ABS) 03.4
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 106.4
STACK GAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM.125321.5
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM.120068.3
STACK GAS VOLUME d 29.92 IN. HG AND 66 DG. F :
(DRY) 127134.1
(MET) 1284IB.3
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SYMBOLS!
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SO F1
8PRES BAROMETRIC PkESSURt, IN HG
OELP DELTA P
OIA DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM! LENGTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CUNIENT
MM MOLECULAR HEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BM MOLE FRACTION HATER VAPOR
PTC PITOT TUBE CUEFFICENT
SPUES STATIC PRESSURE, IN M2U
STtMH STACK TEMPERATURE, DEG F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN HG
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TEMPERATURE, OEG F
VH VELOCITY HEAD, IN M2U
SVOLf-LH STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOM (MET), ACFM
VOLFLN VOLUMETRIC FLON (MET), ACFM
SVOLFLD STANOAHO VOLUMETRIC FLUM (DRY), OSCFM
43.4
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUMCSORMVH • TEMP)) 520.4
DCLP • •.••.--•-•--..----.--- s .......... s
NP 12
STPRES e BPRES » (SPkES/13.6) = 30.43 * ( -8.20/13.6) = 29.fl IN HG
SUM(STEMP) 644.
. .. 3 -—— . = 54. DEG F
NP 12
3.1416 * (DlA/2)**2 3.1416 • ( 60.000/2)**2
.................... s ---..-..........-.--..-... s
144 144
83.49 • PTC • DELP 85.49 • .84 • 43.4
.................... s ....................... s 106.4 AFPM
SURTCMH • STPRES) SORT I 28.73 * 29.8 )
VOLFLM » 60. * STVEL * AREA > 60. * 106.4 • 19.635 * 125321.5 ACFM
SVOLFLN z VOLFLM • STPRES * ( 460. * 68. ) 125321.5 • 29.8 • ( 460. * 68. )
_..._....__................._... s ..................................
29.92 • ( STtMP «• 460. ) 29.92 • ( 53.7 » 460. )
SVOLFLD = SVOLFLH • (1 - BM = 12841B.3 * (1 - .01) s 127134.1 PSCFM
STEMP «
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) *
STVEL
19.635 SO FT
138418.3 ACFM
-------
STACK VELOCITY OAT*
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
RUN NUMBER
ASARCO
01/19/83
NO a SECONDARY EXHAUST
V-17
CLOCK TIME 1606
OPERATOR 9CHEFFEL
AMBIENT TEMP. (OEG.F) 48.
BAR. PRESS. (IN H6) 29.55
STATIC PRESS. (IN H20) -8.60
MOLECULAR HEIGHT 28.73
STACK INSIDE DIM(IN) 60.000
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .«4
MOISTURE CONTENT(S) 1.00
TRAVERSE POSITION \
POINT INCHES
NO.
01 .0 ]
9c .0
> 03 .0
1 04 .0
-J 05 .0
w 06 .0
01 .0
02 .0
03 .0
04 .0
OS .0
06 .0
VELOCITY
HEAD
IN H80)
1.100
.400
.600
.800
.900
.400
.800
.400
.500
.500
.000
.700
STACK
TEMP
(OEG.F)
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
6J.
AVERAGE
3.508
63.
-------
PLANT ASARCO
DATE 01/19/65
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
RUN NUMBER V-17
STACK AREA, SO. FT. 19.635
STACK ABS. PRES., IN H6. 28.90
STACK CAS TEMPERATURE, DE6.F 63.
SORT(VEL HD X STACK TEMP ABS) 42.8
STACK GAS VELOCITY, ACT. FPS 106.6
STACK GAS VOLUME (MET), ACT. CFM.125623.6
STACK GAS VOLUME (DRV), ACT. CFM.124367.4
STACK GAS VOLUME » 29.92 IN. MS AND 68 DG. F :
(DRY) 121286.4
(MET) 122513.5
-------
SAMPLE CALCULAIIUNS
SYMBOLS!
AREA CROSS-SECTIONAL STACK AREA, SO FT
BPRES BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
OELP DELTA P
D1A DIAMETER OF CIRCULAR STACK, IN
DIM! LENGTH Of RECTANGULAR STACK, IN
DIM2 WIDTH OF RECTANGULAR S1ACK, IN
MOIST MOISTURE CONTENT
MM MOLECULAR NEIGHT
NP NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS
BW MOLE FRACTION HATER VAPOR
PTC PITOT TUBE COEFFICENT
5PRES STATIC PRESSURE, IN H20
SlfcMP STACK TEMPERATURE, OE6 F
STPRES STACK PRESSURE, IN Mb
STVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TEMP TEMPERATURE, DEB F
VM VELOCITY HEAD, IN H2o
SVULFLW STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOW (NET), ACFM
VULFLW VOLUMETRIC FLOW IWET), ACFM
SVULFLU STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOW (DRY), OSCFM
42.8
-«J
Ul
FORMULAS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
SUM(SORT (VM • TEMPIJ 513.5
DEL? » ....... .. . s .- c
NP 12
STPRES * BPRES » (SPRES/13.6) s 24.55 * ( -8.80/13.6) = 28.9 IN HG
SUMOTEMPI 756.
.... .... s .... ... e fcj. DEC F
NP 12
3.1416 • (DIA/2)**2 3.1416 • ( 60.000/2)**2
.................... c ..._........_.._.__.__..
144 144
STEKP *
AREA(CIRCULAR STACK) >
19.635 SO FT
65.49 • PTC • OELP 65.49 * .64 • 42.8
STVEL • ................—.- 3 ....................... s 106.6 AFPM
SQRUMW • STPRES) SOHTJ 2».T3 • 28.9 )
VOLFLW > 60. * STVEL • AREA s 60. • 106.6 • 19.635 s 125623.6 ACFM
9VOLFLW « VOLFLW • STPRES • ( 460. » 66. ) 125623.6 • 28.9 • ( 460. * 68. )
29.92 * ( STtMP * 460. ) 29.92 * ( 63.0 * 460. )
SVOLFLD * SVOLFLW • (1 - BM) s 122513.5 • (1 - .01) s 121288.4 OSCFM
122513.5 ACFM
-------
I tLH I'A I A
ML AM
SAMPLING LUCAlKm
SAKPLK !»»>£
UHEHATOK
AMBIEH1 TEMP.tOEb.M
HAK. PRESS. UN. HGJ
STATIC PNESS. ( IN.H2U)
MLTtfc NUMUEK(S)
STACK INSIDE UIM.(IN)
PlTUl fUUE COtFF.
IHtMM. NO.
LEAKAGE
MfcTEK LALIB. FACTOR
ASAHM) IALIIMA,
n«U ;;t(. Ui
t XMAIlS I
bb.
e!<*.bS
-b.OO
0002b07
hU.UO
.04
.Ou
.000 CtM n 10.U
1.037
UAIE
NilU NIIMHkK
P^UHt LtNljlH H fTPt
NIIZZLK : l.U.
ASSUMtO MU1SIUNE
bAMPLE HUX NUM8EH
MblEN HIPX NllMHtH
Mt IfcK MKAU ult-f .
HWllHt rtfcATLM StfMNG
MtAfEW HUX SttfING
N. Hi>
OI/IH/H3
HATC-1
h Fl GLASS
.IbO
1.0
fti»
1.07
ibO.
ifbO.
.b
kEAO H HECUHU DATA EVEHY 4U.U MjiMllltb
TNAVEKSE
POINT
NO.
IMI
A-OI
A-02
A-03
A-04
A-05
A-06
b-01
B-02
0-03
B-04
B-05
B-Ob
B-05
B-04
B-03
B-Od
b-ot
TOTALS
AVERAGE
SAMPLE
11 ME
0
4U.O
BO.O
120.0
IbO.O
200.0
236.0
200.0
32O.O
3bu.u
40U.O
4411.0
500.0
530.0
bbO.O
59u.o
620.0
650. 0
bbO.O
CLUCK
T I ME
CLUCK)
806
H46
1048
1 1 30
1211
1313
1350
IbOa
745
»c?5
905
945
1133
1203
1233
1 303
1333
1403
GAS ME) EH
READING
ICU.K 1 . )
466. b5b
4H7.300
blO.OOO
b3«4.9UU
bb' .400
b97 .000
bl 7.7bb
640.000
bbb.OOO
b9u.OOO
/ 1 ' .000
/bo.ooo
7«b.OOO
001 .400
Bl 7 .300
0 J3.00U
O'lb.OOO
8b/./2H
391.073
VtLUC 1 1 » UN 11- ICE
HEAD Olf-FtH
llU.He'U) UN.H
2
t
\
14
£
4
«!
3
1
,;
1
1
1
1
J
1
OESlHtlt
.040 .97
. 1 7u .19
.MOO .00
.bOU 2.43
,bOU .37
.260 .bl
.bOO .37
.000 cf.Urt
.OOu .00
.bou .37
.000 .99
.bOO .OH
.4bO .«!
.20U .bf
.000 l.bb
.1/00 .b<4
;<»OU .bl
1 .20
PHESSUHt STACK
ENTIAL IH.MP
c?U) lUEb.F)
ACTOAL
.97 bB.
.If b9.
.OU /O.
2.43 70.
.57 HU.
,S1 «0.
. 3/ 7b.
2. OB bO.
.OV bu.
.37 bO.
.99 /b.
• * O O j •
.Ml bV.
.b/ 70.
1 .bb ftO.
.ba bO.
.bl b7.
1.20 bO.
IlKY GAS
TtM
INLET
56.
74.
flO.
82.
82.
8B.
87.
55.
78.
MO.
B2.
80.
84.
84.
86.
Bb.
Mb.
80.
METtH
f
OUI LET
56.
b4.
70.
/«?.
/4.
70.
70.
5b.
b".
b7 .
'2.
70.
74.
74.
7b.
77.
70.
71.
PUMP
VACUUM
(1N.HG)
2.0
2.0
47.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
4.0
6.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.3
SAMPLE
BOX TEMP
(Otb.t- )
260.
2/0.
2/u.
2/0.
270.
270.
250.
260.
260.
260.
270.
2/0.
270.
2/0.
2/0.
2/0.
?70.
266.
IMPlNbEK
TEMP
(UEb.h )
47.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
50.
50.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
58.
-------
PAKMLOLAH FIELD
PLANT- NAME AND AOOHEbS
ASAHCU IACUMA, HASH
S lAHuLAIllilv
TtSI IKAM LkAOFh
TEST PATC-I
NO4 StCONDAHY txHAUbt
>
TEST OAIE
TB
TF
IT
NP
Y
ON
PM
VM
TM
VMStO
VLC
VMC
BHO
FMD
PC 02
P02
PCO
TIME-START
HMk-F 1NISH
NET I1ME. OF 1EST, MIN.
NET SAMPLING POINTS
METER CALIHHATION FACTUH
SAMPLING NOl/LE DIAKEIEH
PITOI TOBE COEFFICIENI
MO
MNS
AVENAGt (JrUI-iCE
DROP
VOLUME OF OHY GAS SAMPLED
Al ME1EH CU^UITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VOLOMt UF OKY GAS SAMPLLU
Al SIANUAHD CONDITIONS*
10IAL H20 COLLECTED IN
IMP1NGEHS AHI) SILICA GEL,ML,
VOLOMt UF «V«TEH VAPOH
Al blANOAHO CONDI I IONS*
PERCENT MOISTORE HY VOLOMt
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PtKttNT COa BY VOL., OHY
PERCENT 02 MY VOL., OHY
PEHCtuT CO UY V«)L., OHY
PERCENT Ni hY VOL., 0«r
MOLECULAR wl-DRY STALK bAb
MIILkLULAH K.1-STACN. GAS
ENGLISH UNITS
III / I M/(l }
HUt>
I/
1.037
.1-3(1
.an
JVI .0/3 CU-F 1
.lM SLF
t.Tl\ SLF
.6(5
.00
.no
it. lu
lifi.OM
«»B.7b
MtlKlu UNlTb
« \ / I 0 / tt 3
Ullb
1 «(!}
bbO.O
I /
3u.<» MM-H«;U
11 .u/a CO-M
23.V t
I l.cfIB bCM
•il ,b
.O// 5CM
.bfl
.(JO
.ou
r'tt.6'4
-------
PB BAKUMtlKlC
P3I SIAIIL HWtS UK STACK UAb
PS S1AC* PKES, AHS.
TS AVEHAbt SlALH TtMP
VS AVG blACK GAS VELOCITY
AS STACK AHEA
OSSTO STACK t-LUi* NAIE. UMY*
09 ACTUAL STACK FLOW HATt
ISO PEHCENT I9UK1NETIC
MN FlLltWAULt PAHT
Mb. tHA 5
CS F1LTEKAHLE PAHT
PMR FILTEKABLk PAHT
EMISSION HATE
I
^J
00
UEG F,
IN.HG.
.^ii 1 IK-HI;
bM. t
IU3.0
I I .533 LH/MH
lSc?.UU
M
-------
EXAMHLt HANtlCULAII- C ALC'JL A 1 1OWS TKSI NO.MA1U-I
NU4 StCUrtDAHY EXHAUM
VOLUME OF l»NY GAS SAMPLED A1 STANOAKII Ll)i»l) II IONS
VMSTU S U/.bO/ * VM * Y • (HH + PM / 13. M) / M>" » <4bll.)
I7.fc«7 • 3-M.OM • 1.037 • I ."f.'jJ » l.lVf, / 13. b)
VMSTU =
IVh.lM l)SC^
VOLUMt OF MAIEH
VKC * .0 » (20.9»3«.B
-------
STACK bAS VtLDLllr Af S1ACK UINII 1 I llHMb
OELP = SUM. UF THt SUHMVH * (IS » «»>('. ))
VS = Sb.«9 * C^ * I'LLP /
VS = Bb.1V • .01 • 569. 5
I/
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW AT SULK CUNDIIIUNS
US = VS * AS * 3bUU/|ao
as = 83. in • ^t^^l . 36«o/iaa = bH/
-------
^ ItLU HA I A
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCAIION
SAMPLE TTPE
AMblbM TEMP. (DEC. F)
bAK.PhtSS. (IN.HG)
STATIC PWESS.(1N.H2I»
ASAkCU
'«)4 SbCUNUflH* IXHAUST
HANI /AhbbML
UA1E
STACK INSIUt »l*.(IN)
PITOT IOBE CUEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
METEK CALIB. FACTOR
KEAU K KttUHO UATA EVEKT
50.
30.00
-6.00
000250H
bO.OO
.04
.00
.OBO CFM rf b.O 1N.MU
1 .037
.0 MlNUIbS
NIJMHtK
PUUHt Lf.MGIH A rrPt
Nd/ZLH 2-111: 1.0.
A.SbllMKI) MDiSTllKb
s»AMPLK HUX NUMHEK
MtltK «0« NUMHbH
Mt TfcK HEAD OlFh .
PHUHt MEATtK StTllNG
MtATEM HUX SEMlNb
01/20/83
H«lL-2
6 ^\ bLASb
.150
1.0
FH4
1.87
250.
250.
.6
00
TRAVERSE SAMPLE
POINf I1ME
NO. IMIN.)
CLOCK
TIME
(24-HR
1 I tit* ¥ \
GAS MEItH VbLOClTl OK1FICE PKE5SUHE SlACK
HEADING HbAU UlFFbKbNUAL IbMP
(CU.KI.) (IN.HcMI) IIIV.H2U) IOEG.F)
UbSIWbll
INIT 0
ft-'Jl !0.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
A-02 70.0
80.0
9o.O
100.0
110. 0
120.0
A-03 130.0
140.0
150.0
160.0
170.0
180.0
A-04 190.0
200.0
210.0
220.0
230.0
240.0
A-05 250.0
260.0
270.0
280.0
290.0
300.0
820
R30
850
900
910
940
950
1000
1010
1020
1030
1040
1050
1100
1110
1 120
1356
1406
1416
1426
1436
1446
14S6
1506
1516
1526
1536
1546
1556
1606
059.021
066.000 3.500
073.100 3.500
080.000 3.500
084.550
088.990
095.900
900.500
906.000
91 1.000
915.700
920.900
925.600
931.650
930.700
943.630
949.400
954.330
959.300
964.350
969.600
.200
.200
(.500
.200
.300
.300
.300
.300
.400
.400
(.700
.400
.400
.40U
.400
.500
.500
976.000 4.000
983.050 4.000
99e!.000 4.300
99/.000 1.400
2.545 1.400
7.500 1.400
12.450 1.4OO
20.100 4.iOO
20.700 4.600
34.UOO 1.500
1.04
1.05
1 .Ob
.65
.65
1.90
.66
.71
. /4
.73
.73
.73
.00
2.10
.79
.00
.00
.78
.04
.04
2.20
2.20
2.4H
.11
.79
.79
.7-1
c:.5H
2.54
.Ob
ACTUAL
1 .84
1 .85
1 .8b
.65
.65
I .90
.66
.71
.'4
.73
.73
.73
.80
2.10
.79
.80
.80
. 7«»
.84
.84
2.20
2.20
2.40
.77
.79
.74
.79
2.50
2.54
.C6
OKT GAS Mb TEW POMP SAMPLE
IbMP VACUUM BUX TbMP
(Ubb.K) (IN.HU) (UFG.r)
IMPINGEK
TEMP
(UEG.F)
INLtl UlirLtT
80.
02.
02.
75.
/4.
70.
75.
To.
60.
63.
62.
61.
59.
66.
66.
59.
60.
64.
61.
62.
70.
75.
74.
75.
60.
64.
65.
00.
Ml .
b5.
56.
63.
66.
71.
72.
76.
74.
74.
77.
7d.
80.
80.
80.
82.
62.
82.
62.
72.
72.
74.
70.
80.
62.
84.
83.
63.
84.
84.
86.
66.
55.
50.
60.
62.
64.
65.
60.
60.
70.
70.
70.
70.
71.
72.
72.
M.
74.
66.
60.
68.
70.
7o.
70.
72.
74.
M.
76.
76.
76.
11.
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
250.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
260.
250.
250.
250.
250.
25".
60.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
60.
58.
60.
60.
60.
60.
-------
PLANI
SAMPLING LOCATION
KtAU ft MtCUKU DATA EVtKY
ASANCU
NU4 btCUMUAKY bXHAUbt
.0 MlNUlbb
UAIt
KUN NliMHtH
01/dO/»J3
PAlL-d
00
NJ
TRAVbKSt
PUINI
NO.
A-Ob
B-01
b-02
B-03
SAMPLE
lilt
310.0
320.0
330.0
340.0
350.0
3bO.O
370. V
380.0
390.0
000.0
010.0
420.0
030.0
000.0
050.0
060.0
470.0
CLOCK
T IMk
(20-MH
CLOCK)
Iblb
Ib2b
Ib3b
lb«b
Ib56
1 70b
1736
170b
1/56
IQOb
1816
1826
1836
1933
1903
1953
2003
GAS Ml IbH VtLUCllT
KIAUINU HtAU
MklMCt PKESSUWb olACK
oiFf-bwewi i AL IKMP
UN.Ht'U) lUtG.KJ
DtSlHtU
00. 700
O5.950
51 .250
5b.ooo
62.000
7U.670
75.000
79.400
M3.80U
91 .000
97.000
IO2.4UO
10/ . 100
1 1 1.800
116.200
121.350
125.45o
3.500
1 .bOO
1 .bOO
1 .600
4.HUO
4.000
1 . 100
1 .100
1.100
3.300
3.300
1.300
I .300
1.300
1 .300
1 .300
1 .300
1.90
.9^
.92
.9tf
ef./d
«!./0
.62
.02
.62
1 .00
10.18
.M
. 70
./3
.73
. /3
. / 3
ALIOAL
1.98
.92
.92
.92
2.70
2. 70
.62
.62
.62
l.rtO
1 .HO
./3
./4
.73
./3
./3
.73
rtM>
lotr,,
Mfclb» PUMP 5AMPLt
' VACUUM HUX TLMP
.f- ) (1'J.Hl,) (Utti.t)
IMPlNbEW
ItMP
(Utb.M
INLtT UUTLLT
67.
64.
63.
62.
HO.
80.
74.
65.
60.
00.
/2.
73.
60.
60.
60.
62.
63.
8b.
87.
87.
86.
87.
87.
86.
82.
82.
84 .
83.
8b.
8b.
70.
70.
7tt.
80.
77.
70.
70.
70.
70.
70.
80.
70.
7 / .
70.
70.
70.
70.
74.
70.
70.
74.
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
25(«.
bO.
bO.
bO.
bO.
bO.
60.
bO.
60.
bO.
bO.
60.
bO.
bO.
bO.
bO.
bV.
60.
TOTALS
AVERAGE
070.0
220.829
1.38
1.20
b9.
80.
72.
2.0 255.
55.
-------
PAMUCOLAIh KIH.I) DAIA K KtSULlS (AliOLAIlOlM
PLANT- NAME ANU ADDRESS ItSI IKAM LEADER
A3AHCU SSLMKMtL
TtST PATC-3
TEST UAIE
SECHMIANY tXHAUbl
ENGLISH UNITS
ui,
Ul
TB
TF
TT
MP
Y
ON
CP
PM
1
00
U) VM
TM
VMSTO
VLC
VhC
BMO
FMO
PC02
P02
PCO
PN8
MD
MNS
TIME-START tttJU
T1ME-HNISM <;uu3
NET TIMt OF TEST, MIN. <• 1 0 . U
NEI SAMPLING POINTS U/
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR 1.1M7
SAMPLING NOHLE OIAMEIER ,lbt> IN
P1TOT TOBE COEFFICIENT .»q
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE 1»«>0 IN-H2U
DROP
VOLUMt OF DRY GAS SAMPLED 2«?tt.»e!V CU-t-T
AT MEIER CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP 7S.9 F
VOLOME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED tM5.1U3 SCF
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
TOTAL Hi\> COLLECTED IN 38. 8
IMP1NGERS AND SILICA GEL, ML.
VOLUMt OF WATER VAPOR 1 .Belb SCF
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
PERCENT MOISTURE HY VOLUME .77
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS .99?
PERCENT CU^ BY VOL., DRY .UU
PERCENT 0«J HY VOL., DRY iJO.Iu
PERCENT CO UY VOL., DKY .UU
PERCENT HZ bY VOL., DHY 7V. IU
MOLECULAR i*i-r>n» SIACK GAS C'H.HU
MULECULAH WT-STACK GAS c^tt./i
^S"
<< 7U.U
a ?
1 . U 3 7
3.tt MM
.««
30.0 MM-HcJO
b.18U CU-M
-------
PB HARUM:CK1C PfcKSSMhK
PSI SIAIIC PRES OF STACK GAS
P3 STAC* PWES, AifS.
TS AVEKAbE S1ALK UMP
VS AVG STACK GAS VELUtlTr
AS STACK AHEA
(1SSTU STACK FLUM KA(F., UWT«
US ACTUAL STACK FLOH HATt
ISO PERCENT 1SOKINETIC
MN FILTEMAHLE PAHT
M(i. EPA 5
CS FILTEHABLE PAMT
PMH FlLUKAbLE PAHT
EMIbSlUN HATE
« 66 OEG F, <;9.92 IN.HG.
00
MM-Mb
-b.Ou |h
HU.b FPS
S'J-IN
SLT- M
ALFM
MM-HI,
C
SCMH
lb!3US. ACMM
M(,/UbCM
lb.0b«> LH/hH
-------
EXAMPLt HAH t iLMLATh C ALLUI. A t 1 UN:} ItSl i
I 100. • I. 83
°? BMU = — — - --- --— — ------- - --- = .77
3. 103 » 1.83
MOLE FRACTION OF OHT STACK GAS
FMU = 1100. - BMOJ / 100.
100. - .8
FMl) s — .... . — — -- ---- - --- -
100.
AVERAGE MOLECULAN HEIGHT OF \)H1 STACK GAb
MO = (PC02 • ,aa) * (P02 * .3?) » (PN2 » PCO) * .28
MO = ( .00«ia/100) » (20.9*32/100) + l(7S.l» .0) * 2H/100 = <>8.8 (Bftfl/100)) + 18. * (HWIJ/lOO)
MHS = 28.81* (1. -( .77/100)) » IB. • I ./7/IOO) = «J«.7b
-------
STACK bAS VtLULllT Al STACK tUMUl T10US
OELP = SUM. Uf IHE S'JWUVH * (IS » IbU.M
VS = 85. 19 • CP • UtLP / (SU«T(Mv»S • Pb) • HUTS)
VS = H5.a9 » .«« * 1537.0/1 /
FH.S
STACK KAS VOLUHE1H1C FUO»» AT SIACK CiUNUITIUNS
US s VS * AS * 5hOO/lau
OS = 80.59 * €?«d7. 3bUU/|ua =
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLUM AT SIANUAMu CONDITIONS
OSSTU s 17.647 « OS • PS • (I. - Ittwu/ 1 On) ) / (TS »
I7.b«7 • 569b538. * i>9.5b • II. - I
- --- — — — . — .. — .-. ----- .......
( b9. * <4bO.)
USSIU =
. SCFH
00
PERCENT ISOKlNttlC
ISO s (3«5.5««(TS»«bO.)
130 =
a70. *
. 03 M
«»9.Sb •
)/(TT«VS«Pb*DN«UNI
1 ,2l)5/ 1 3.b) ) / t 7b.»abO.)J)
- ---------------------------
* .150
s 8b.i; PtHCENT
PAHTICULATE LUAU1NG — EPA MtTHUU b (Al STANuAHu CUNUHIUNS)
CS = 0.001 * Ml* * 15.03 / VMSTU
CS = 0.001 • 307.5 • 15. W/DSC>-
PAHTICULATE LHS/MR -- EPA MEIHUI) 5
PMH = CS * OSSTU / (15.43 * a53.b)
PMH = .0202 • 5572920. / (15. 03 * 053
Ib.0b9
-------
FIELD DATA
I
00
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP.(DEG.F)
BAR.PRESS.(IN.HG)
STATIC PRESS.(IN.M20)
FILTER NUMBER(S)
STACK INSIDE DIM.(IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
METER CALIB. FACTOR
ASARCO
NU 4 SECONDARY EXXHAU3T
PART/ARSENIC
3CHEFFEL
SO.
29.70
-6.00
3530461
60.00 .00
.84
.002 CFM 3 12.0 IN.HG
1.037
DATE
RUN NUMBER
PROBE LENGTH ft TYPE
NOZZLE I 1.0.
ASSUMED MOISTURE
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
METEH HEAO DIFF.
PROBE HEATER SETTING
MEATER BOX SETTING
01/22/83
PATt-3
6 FT GLASS
.150
1.0
F84
1.87
250.
250.
READ ft RECORD DATA EVERY 10.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
MIT
•01
•02
•03
-04
•05
•06
•0*
-05
-04
•03
-02
-01
-01
-02
-03
-04
-05
B-06
8-06
B-OS
B-04
B-03
B-02
B-01
01
02
03
04
05
06
SAMPLE
TIME
(MIN.)
0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
110.0
120.0
130.0
140.0
150.0
160.0
170.0
180.0
190.0
200.0
210.0
220.0
230.0
240.0
250.0
260.0
270.0
280.0
290.0
300.0
CLOCK
TIME
(24-HR
CLOCK)
910
920
930
940
950
1000
1010
1054
1104
1114
1124
1134
1149
1159
1209
1613
1623
1633
1712
1722
1732
1742
1752
1802
1812
1822
1910
1920
1934
1944
2025
GAS METER
READING
(CU.FT.)
126.251
133.200
137.800
142.300
147.500
154.400
160.400
169.000
176.300
181.600
186.600
191.300
196.650
202.900
208.200
213.700
218.650
225.600
230.850
236.700
244.000
249.500
254.550
259.300
264.000
268.500
273.500
279.340
286.400
291.300
296.100
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN.H20)
3.599
1.300
1.300
1.600
3.100
2.260
4.800
3.520
1.700
1.400
1.300
1.740
2.400
1.740
1.740
1.500
2.960
1.700
2.170
3.500
1.900
1.500
1.300
1.200
1.200
1.740
2.180
3.000
1.300
1.500
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(IN.H20)
DESIRED
1.8?
.70
.71
.88
1.72
1.25
2.64
1.94
.95
.79
.73
.98
1.34
.98
.98
.87
1.65
.90
1.21
1.90
1.05
.83
.73
.68
.68
.98
1.23
1.70
.73
.84
ACTUAL
1.87
.70
.71
.88
1.72
1.25
2.64
1.94
.95
.79
.73
.98
1.34
.98
.98
.87
1.65
.90
1.21
1.90
1.05
.85
.73
.68
.68
.98
1.23
1.70
.73
.84
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
67-
64.
62.
61.
61.
65.
70.
65.
61.
60.
59.
60.
66.
68.
64.
62.
62.
80.
64.
80.
70.
68.
64.
62.
62.
63.
62.
60.
64.
60.
DRV GAS METER PUMP
TEMP VACUUM
(DEG.F) (IN.HG)
INLET
92.
56.
58.
64.
68.
72.
74.
68.
70.
74.
76.
77.
76.
78.
68.
68.
70.
74.
70.
72.
76.
77.
78.
79.
79.
80.
73.
74.
72.
72.
OUTLET
50. 3.0
52. .0
54. .0
56. .0
58. .0
60. .0
63. .0
64. .0
65. .0
66. .0
66. .0
68. .0
69. .0
70. .0
64. .0
64. .0
65. .0
66. .0
66. .0
66. .0
67. .0
68. .0
70. .0
70. .0
70. .0
72. .0
70. .0
70. .0
70. .0
68. .0
SAMPLE
BOX TEMP
(DEG.F)
,
250.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
2SO.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
IMPINGE*
TEMP
(OEG.F)
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
-------
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
ASARCO
NO 0 SECONDARY EXXHAUST
DATE
RUN NUMBER
01/32/83
PATC-3
READ t RECORD DATA EVERY 10.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
06
05
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
06
06
05
04
1 "
00
oo TOTALS
AVERAGE
SAMPLE
TIME
(MIN.)
310.0
320.0
330.0
340.0
350.0
360.0
370.0
380.0
390.0
400.0
410.0
420.0
430.0
440.0
450.0
453.0
453.0
CLOCK
TIME
(24-HR
CLOCK)
2035
2045
2055
2105
2115
2125
2135
2145
2155
2205
2215
2225
2320
2330
2340
2343
GAS METER VELOCITY
READING HEAD
(CU.FT.) (IN.M20)
301.400 .500
306.250 .500
311.150 .400
316.000 .300
320.600 .300
325.400 .200
329.720 .200
334.500 .300
339.300 .200
344.000 .300
349.000 .400
357.000 4.000
364.700 4.000
372.700 4.000
380.700 4.000
383.000 3.600
256.749
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(IN.H20)
DESIRED
.84
.84
.79
.73
.73
.68
.68
.73
.68
.74
.79
2.20
2.30
2.28
2.28
2.07
1.17
ACTUAL
.84
.84
.79
.73
.73
.68
.68
.73
.68
.74
.79
2.20
2.30
2.28
2.28
2.07
1.17
STACK
TEMP
(OEG.F)
DRY GAS
TEMP
(OEG.
METER PUMP
VACUUM
F) (IN.HG)
SAMPLE
BOX TEMP
(OEG.F)
IMPINGER
TEMP
(OEG.F)
INLET OUTLET
60.
60.
65.
63.
6*.
61.
61.
64.
63.
61.
61.
80.
55.
55.
55.
53.
63.
72.
76.
77.
78.
78.
79.
79.
80.
80.
80.
80.
80.
72.
75.
75.
76.
74.
68.
70.
70.
70.
70.
70.
70.
72.
72.
72.
72.
7*.
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
70. 4.0
70. 4.0
70. 4.0
70. 4.0
67. 1.6
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
255.
253.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA & RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT* NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
A8ARCO SCHEFFEL
TEST PATC-J
NO « SECONDARY EXXHAUST
ENGLISH UNITS
TEST DATE
TB
TF
TT
NP
Y
ON
CP
> PM
1
00
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
NET SAMPLING POINTS
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
DROP
01/22/83
910
2343
453
46
1
!
.0
.037
.150 IN
.84
.!? IN-H20
METRIC UNITS
01
910
2343
453.
46
1.
3.
•
29,
/22/83
0
037
a
84
7
MM
MM-I
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTO VOLUME Of DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VLC TOTAL HZO COLLECTED IN
IMPINGERS AND SILICA GEL,ML.
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BMO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMO MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL., DRY
POZ PERCENT OZ BY VOL., DRY
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL., DRV
PNZ PERCENT NZ BY VOL., DRY
MD MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MHS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
256.749 CU-FT
70.2 F
263.952 SCF
47.3
2.226 SCF
7.270 CU-M
21.2 C
7.474 SCM
47.3
.063 SCM
.6*
.992
.00
20.90
.00
79.10
28.84
28.75
.84
.992
.00
20.90
.00
79.10
28.84
28.75
-------
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRCS OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRE3, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
VS AV6 STACK GAS VELOCITY
AS STACK AREA
USSTD STACK FLOW RATE. DRV*
OS ACTUAL STACK FLON RATE
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MN FILTERABLE PART
MS. EPA 5
CS FILTERABLE PART
PMR FILTERABLE PART
EMISSION RATE
79.9
2827.
5524104.
5646645.
101.J
153.6
29.70 IN-HG
-6.00 IN-M20
29.26 IN-HG
63. F
FPS
30-1N
SCFH
ACFH
.0090 GR/DSCF*
7.087 LB/HR
750.38 MM-HG
-152.40 MM-H20
743.17 MM-HG
17. C
21.3 MPS
1.824 SO-M
156426. SCMH
159896. ACMH
101.3
153.6
20.552 MG/D3CM
3.21 KG/HR
* 68 DEC F,
IN.HG.
VO
O
-------
EXAMPLE PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS TEST NO.PATC-3
NO 4 SECONDARY EXXHAUST
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VMSTO * (17.647 * VM • Y * (PB * PM / 13.6)) / (TM » 460.)
17.647 • 256.749 • 1.037 • ( 29.70 + 1.170 / 13.6)
VMSTO * — — = 263.952 D3CF
( 70. » 060.)
VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VMC » .04707 * VLC
VMC « .04707 * 47. * 2.23 SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE IN STACK GAS
•MO * (100. * VMC) / (VMSTO * VMC)
100. * 2.23
BMO » —— —— « —- = .84 PERCENT
263.992 «• 2.23
MOLE FRACTION OF DRY STACK GAS
FMD a (100. - B*0) / 100.
100. • .8
FMD « ——————— * .992
100.
AVERAGE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF DRY STACK GAS
MD * (PC02 • .44) » (P02 * .32) * (PN2 » PCO) * .28
MD * ( .00*44/100) » (20.9*32/100) « ((79.1* .0) • 2R/100 = 28.84
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS
MMS • MD * (1. - (BWO/100)) * 18. • (BfcO/100)
MMS » 26.84* (1. •( .84/100)) »!«.*( .84/100) = 28.75
-------
STACK GAS VELOCITY AT STACK CONDITIONS
DELP * SUM. OF THE SORT(VH * (TS » 460.))
VS • 85.49 • CP • OELP / (SORT(MMS * PS) * PNTS)
VS 8 85.49 * .84 * 1484.000 / (SOHT( 28.75 • 29.2b) * Qfc. = 79.88 FP3
STACK 6A8 VOLUMETRIC FLO* AT STACK CONDITIONS
OS = VS * A3 • 3600/144
OS » 79.68 • 3827. 3600/144 = 5646645. ACFH
STACK 6AS VOLUMETRIC FLON AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
OSSTO * 17.647 • OS • PS * (1. • (BMO/100)) / (TS » 460.)
17.647 • 5646645. * 29.26 •(!.-( .84/100))
OSSTO * • = 5524104. SCFH
( 63. * 460.)
•f PERCENT ISOKINETIC
vo
to ISO s (305.58«(TS»460.))«((0.002669«VLC)*(VM«Y«(PB»(PM/13.6))/(TM*460.)))/(TToVS*PS<>DN«DN)
(305.58«( 63.+460.))«((0.002669* 47.)*( 256.749*1.037*( 29.70«( 1.170/13.6))/( 70.«460.)))
ISO « ———.——. . ... ... .. . s 101.26 PERCENT
453. • 79.88 • 89.26 • .150 • .150
PARTICULATE LOADING — EPA METHOD 5 (AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
CS • 0.001 • MN • 15.43 / VMSTD
CS ' 0.001 • 153.6 • 15.43 / 263.952 > .0090 GB/OSCF
PARTICULATE LBS/HR — EPA METHOD 5
PMR * CS * OSSTD / (15.43 • 453.6)
PMR « .0090 • 5524104. / (15.43 • 453.6) * 7.087
-------
END OF PROGRAM
:EOJ
CPU SEC. * 10. ELAPSED M]N. r |. FBI, FEB 18, 1983, 1:55 PM
vi)
-------
FIELD DATA
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEC. F)
BAR. PRESS. (IN.HG)
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20)
FILTER NUMBER m
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
METER CALIB. FACTOR
ASARCO
N04 SECONDARY EXHAUST
PART/ARSENIC
SCHEFFEL
55.
29.55
-9.00
0002440
60.00 .00
.84
.002 CFM a 7.0 IN.HG
.986
DATE 01/18/63
RUN NUMBER PASM-I
PROBE LENGTH ft TYPE 6 FOOT GLASS
NOZZLE 2-22M I.D. .120
ASSUMED MOISTURE 1.0
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER FB5
METEH HEAD D1FF. 1.95
C FACTOR 1.05
PROBE HEATER SETTING 250.
HEATER BOX SETTING 250.
REFERENCE PRESS. DIFF. .00
READ 8 RECORD DATA EVERY .0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER VELOCITY ORIFICE PRESSURE
POINT TIME TIME
NO. (MIN.) (24-HR
INIT 0 909
> IS. 6 925
' 77.5 1215
£ 95.0 1254
99.0 1300
105.0 1307
108.0 1310
109.0 1316
110.0 1330
111.0 1343
114.0 1349
140.0 1610
153.6 1625
173.5 830
174.8 833
177.2 840
181.7 845
209.4 945
212.0 1015
220.0 1036
221.0 1138
222.4 1134
230.0 1235
233.5 1322
READING HEAD DIFFERENTIAL
(CU.FT.) (IN.H20) (IN.H20)
DESIRED ACTUAL
668.131
676.729
712.353
722.000
724.900
727.000
728.530
729.143
729.693
730.353
731.954
743.500
750.330
761.560
762.200
764.700
766.035
781.930
783.510
788.230
788.763
789.460
793.537
794.290
.100
.300
.500
.000
.800
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.600
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.00
.05
.06
.45
.44
.06
.08
.08
.06
.06
.65
.64
.06
.06
.08
.08
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.00
.05
.08
.45
.44
.06
.08
.08
.08
.08
.65
.64
.06
.08
.08
.06
.06
.06
.06
.08
.06
.000 .95 .95
.000 .95 .95
STACK
TEMP
(DE6.F)
65.
81.
82.
78.
76.
104.
85.
62.
89.
63.
62.
80.
74.
75.
75.
76.
73.
80.
65.
78.
78.
79.
80.
DRV GAS METER PUMP SAMPLE IMPINGER
TEMP VACUUM BOX TEMP TEMP
(OEG.F) (IN.HG) (DEG.F) (OE6.F)
INLET OUTLET
64. 60. 4.0 275. SO.
66. 66. 5.0 275. 60.
76. 74. 5.0 275. 62.
80. 74. 4.0 275. 62.
60. 74. 3.0 275. 62.
80. 74. 2.0 275. 62.
60. 74. 2.0 27S. 62.
80. 74. 2.0 275. 62.
80. 74. 2.0 275. 62.
76. 74. 2.0 275. 62.
72. 70. 4.0 275. 62.
82. 72. 5.0 275. 62.
56. 56. 5.0 270. 60.
65. 60. 5.0 2SO. 60.
66. 60. 5.0 250. 60.
68. 60. 5.0 250. 60.
68. 64. 5.0 260. 60.
74. 70. 5.0 260. 60.
74. 70. 5.0 260. 60.
72. 70. 5.0 260. 60.
72. 69. 5.0 270. 60.
72. 70. 5.0 270. 60.
74. 70. 5.0 270. 60.
TOTALS
AVERAGE
233.5
126.159
1.02
1.02
60.
73.
69.
4.1 268.
60.
-------
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA S RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT- NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
ASARCO SCHEFFEL
TEST PASM-t
N04 SECONDARY EXHAUST
TEST
TB
TF
TT
NP
Y
ON
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
NET SAMPLING POINTS
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
ENGLISH UNITS
01/16/83
909
1322
233.5
23
.988
.120 IN
.64
1.02 IN-H20
METRIC UNITS
01/16/63
909
1322
233.5
23
.986
3.0 MM
.84
26.0 MM-I
DROP
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRV GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VLC TOTAL H2t COLLECTED IN
IMPIN6ERS AND SILICA GEL,ML.
VNC VOLUME OF NATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMO MOLE FRACTION DRV GAS
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL., DRV
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOL., DRV
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL.. DRV
PN2 PERCENT N2 BY VOL.* DRV
MD MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MNS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
126.159 CU-FT
3.572 CU-M
71.0 F
122.709 SCF
18.6
.876 SCF
.71
.993
.00
20.90
.00
79.10
28.84
26.76
21.7
3.475
18.6
.025
.71
.993
.00
20.90
.00
79.10
28.84
26.76
C
SCM
SCM
-------
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
P3I STATIC PRE3 Of STACK GAS
PS STACK PRE3, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
VS AV6 STACK CAS VELOCITY
AS STACK AREA
OSSTO STACK FLON RATE, DRY*
0S ACTUAL STACK FLON RATE
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MN FILTERABLE PART
MG. EPA 5
CS FILTERABLE PART
PMR FILTERABLE PART
EMISSION RATE
119.0
2827.
7680645.
8408552.
100.0
227.8
29.55 IN-MG
-9.00 IN-M20
28.89 IN-MG
80. f
FPS
SO-IN
SCFH
ACFH
.0286 GR/OSCF*
32.253 LB/HR
750.57 MM-H6
-228.60 MM-H20
733.76 MM-HG
27. C
36.3 MPS
1.824 SO-M
223156. SCMH
238105. ACMH
100.0
227.8
65.565 MG/DSCM
14.63 KG/HP
• 60 DEC f,
IN.H6.
VO
-------
EXAMPLE PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS TEST NO.PASM-1
N04 SECONDARY EXHAUST
VOLUME OF DRV GAS SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VMSTD » (17.647 • VM * Y • (P8 «• PM / 13.6)) / (TM * 060.)
17.647 • 126.159 • .989 * ( 29.55 » 1.053 / 13.6)
VMSTD « —-——— = 122.709 DSCF
( 71. » 460.)
VOLUME OP WATER VAPOR AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VMC » .04707 • VLC
VMC • .04707 • 19. * .88 SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE IN STACK GAS
BMO • (100. * VNC) / (VMSTD * VMC)
190. • .88
BWO « —————————— z .71 PERCENT
122.709 * .88
MOLC FRACTION OF DRY STACK GAS
FMD * (100. - BNO) / 100.
100. - .7
FMD » ——————— s .993
100.
AVERAGE MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF DRY STACK GAS
MD * (PC02 • .44) * (P02 • .32) * (PN2 «• PCO) • .28
MD a ( .00*44/100) » (20.9*32/100) * ((79.1* .0) * 28/100 r 28.84
MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS
MN8 • MD • (1. • (BNO/100)) » 18. • (BHO/100)
MNS • 28.84* (1. -( .71/100)) » 18. • ( .71/100) 8 28.76
-------
STACK 6*8 VELOCITY AT STACK CONDITIONS
DELP • SUM. OF THE SQRT(VH * (TS * 460.))
VS « SS.49 • CP • OELP / (SORT(MMS • PS) • PNTS)
VS e 6S.49 • .04 • 1098.175 / (SORT( 28.76 • 28.89) » 23. = 118.96 FPS
STACK CAS VOLUMETRIC FLOM AT STACK CONDITIONS
US « VS • AS • 3600/144
OS • llB.9fc * 2827. 3600/144 a 8408552. ACFH
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLON AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
OSSTO • 17.647 • OS • PS • (1. • (BNO/100)) / (TS + 460.)
17.647 • 8408552. • 28.89 •(!.-( .71/100))
OSSTO 8 — —.—. . s 7880645. SCFM
( 80. » 460.)
>
vi, PERCENT ISOKINETIC
oo
ISO » (305.S8»(TS*460.))M(0.002669«VLC)»(VM«YMPB*(PM/13.6))/(TM»460.)))/(TToV3oPS«DN«ON)
(305.58M 80.*460.))«((0.002669* 19.)*( 126.159* ,988*( 29.55»( 1.023/13.6))/( 71.*460.)))
ISO « ———— ——— .... .........—.......... .. ...... .—.. . ....... e 100.03 PERCENT
234. * 118.96 • 28.89 * .120 • .120
PARTICULATE LOAOIN6 — EPA METHOD 5 (AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
CS » 0.001 • MN * 15.43 / VMSTD
CS « 0.001 • 227.8 * 15.43 / 122.709 = .0286 6R/DSCF
PARTICULATE LBS/HR — EPA METHOD 5
PMR « CS • OSSTD / (15.43 • 453.6)
PMR • .0286 • 7880645. / (15.43 • 453.6) * 32.253
-------
I- 1LLU OAIA
I
vo
vo
PLANT ASAKtU
SAMPLING LOCATION Ml) 14 SECDNUAhY
SAMPLE IYPE PAHI /A*i,tNl X
UPbHATUH SCntH-tl
AMBlbNI TEMP.(OFG.F) -JO.
BAK.PHbSS.llN.Ht.) 30.00
STATIC PHESS. UN.H20) -9.uu
F1LTEH NOMBEM(S) 0002505
STACK INSlOb DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
PHOT TUBE COEFF. ,b4
THbHM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 OM „• 6.
MEIbH CALltt. FACTOR .968
HEAD A HbCORO DATA
TRAVbHSE
POINT
NO.
INIT
SAMPLE
TIMb
(M1N.)
0
26.2
29.0
31.0
32.0
33.3
35.6
37.6
05.5
47. S
53.5
55.2
57.7
59.0
85.5
103.3
105.8
106.4
111.0
115.4
122.0
130.7
131.6
CLOCK
TIME
(24-MH
ft 1 If* W t
LL UL K I
820
848
655
945
950
953
1000
1004
1052
KJ57
1 105
1114
1121
1426
1500
1557
1610
1616
1 700
1 70H
1804
1815
1832
EVEHY .0
GAS ME TLK
REALMS,
UU.K 1 .)
795.600
810.110
610.515
81 1.450
81 1.940
612.500
813.757
614.740
616. 5H5
81 9. 7b3
822.600
023.440
024.655
825.375
839.332
840. 0h4
05o. 1 /5
050.440
652.063
855.200
650.900
06«f.672
663.075
MiiUlES
VtLOCll »
HbAO
( 1N.H20)
3.700
3.700
3.700
3. 700
3.700
3.700
3.700
3. 700
3.700
3.700
3.700
3.700
3.700
4.000
4.000
4.00V
4.000
4.000
4.000
3.300
3.300
3.300
tXMAIJSI
5 IN. Mb
iiKincE
IHH-E
I IN.
DESlMtU
.87
.07
.or
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.95
.95
.95
.95
.95
.95
.78
.'In
. /rt
OAlh 01/20/83
PHUBb LENGM * TYHt 6 Fl GLASS
NIIZ/LE : 1.0. .120
ASoUMtU M01STOHE 1.0
SAMPLE HOX NU^BEH
WtlEH HOX NUMrftH FB5
ME1EK HEAD 1)1 Ft- . 1 .95
L FAUTOH 1.05
PHOHb MbATER SETTING 250.
HbATtH BOX SbT I ING 250.
KEfE'HENCb PHbSS. 01FF. .00
PHESSuWE
HENT1AL
M2U)
ACIUAL
.87
.87
.fl 1
.87
.87
.87
.87
.87
.87
.87
.87
.87
.87
.95
.95
.95
.9i
.95
.95
.70
.70
.70
SI ACK
UKY GAS
MtTE»
IE.M(J TbMP
tObU.F)
60.
70.
77.
60.
03.
65.
75.
63.
60.
60.
67.
72.
75.
00.
00.
7o.
70.
76.
73.
HO.
70.
70.
(ObG
I Nit!
5«.
7*.
70.
70.
70.
70.
70.
70.
70.
70.
72.
72.
70.
70.
76.
77.
77.
76.
76.
75.
75.
76.
.F)
OOlLbl
56.
64.
66.
66.
66.
66.
66.
66.
66.
66.
66.
67.
66.
67.
70.
72.
It.
72.
72.
72.
72.
72.
PUMP
VACUUM
(1N.HU)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
SAMPLE
BOX TtMP
(UF.G.M
250,
250.
250.
250.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
270.
IMPlNbEH
TtMP
(OEb.F)
50,
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
5V.
50.
5V.
5V.
50.
50.
5V.
5V.
5V.
50.
5V.
50.
5V.
50.
50.
TOTALS
AVEHAGE
131.6
.00
.60
74.
72.
60.
6.0
266.
50.
-------
HARUCULAIt MILD DATA K WtSULIS I flUUL A 1 1 HIV
PLANT- NAME AND ADDRESS ItSI ItAM
ASAHCU SCHtFt-tL
TES1 PASM-2
TEST DATE
NU 4 StCUNDARY tXHAUSf
hNULISM UNITS
01,
MtTRIC OMTb
oi /<»o/a 5
Tb
TF
TT
MP
Y
ON
CP
> PM
1
0 VM
TM
VMSTO
VLC
VHC
BMO
FMO
PC 02
PU2
PCO
PN2
MD
MHS
IIME-SIART 82(1 «20
TIME-FINISH ld.Se Ie3<;
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN. 131. b 131. b
NET SAMPLING POINTS tt 22
MtTER CALIBRATION FACTOR .968 .980
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETEK ,\d(j IN J.O MM
P1TUT TUBE COEFFICIENT ,8CM
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME .37 .37
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS .9<*b .9
-------
PB HAHOMtrhIC PKK85UWE
PSI STAIIC HUES OK STACK GAS
PS SlACK HUES, ArtS.
TS AVEKAbE SlACK TEMP
VS AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
A3 SlACK AHEA
USSTO SlACK FLUn MAfK, DkT*
OS ACIUAL STACK FLUH WATE
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MN FlLTENAbLE KAMI
M(i. EHA b
CS F1LTEHAHLE PART
PMH FILFEHABLE PART
EMISSION WAtE
* b6 DEb F, 29.93 IN.HU.
!
M
O
jii.du IIV-HI;
-4.00 IN-M«?U
71. F
110.1 FPS
SO-IN
SUFM
778SIB3. ACFM
100. B
UH/OSCI-*
LU/HW
/bi.OO MM-Mi,
/Ob.
too. a
103. ao9 Mb/USCM
^«J.OJ Kb/UK
-------
bXAMHLt PAHTltiM.ATE C ALC UL A 1 1 IJI«S ttSl l\Jll.»'A.SM-ef
NU 4 SELONOAHY EXHAUSI
VOLUME OF UHY bAS SAMPLE!) AT SUNOANU LUNDIIIMI.S
VMSri) = (17.647 • VM * Y • (PB * KM / 13.6)) / I I r- * «bO.)
17.647 • 67.275 • .9HH * ( 30.00 » .800 / 13. h)
VMSIO = -------------------- — ..---- ---------------- ....... = bh.^bb USC^
C ft). » any.)
VOLUME OF WAItN VAPUW AT STANOARU
VMC 3 .047U7 * VLC
VWC = ,0a707 * 5. = .3* SCF
PEKCENI M01S1UHE IN STACK GAS
BHO = 1100. • VttC) / (VM3TO * VWt)
>
I 100. • ,2fl
-------------------------- = .it
to 6b.5b5 * .?a
MOLE FRACTION UF OUT STACK GAS
FMU = (100. - BHO) / 100.
100. - .0
FMU = - --- -
100.
AVERAGE MOLECULAH ME1GHT OF URT STACK
MO = (PCOe • .
-------
STACK bAS VtLlllIlY At STACK t()NI) 1
UELP = SUM. UF I ML SUWT(VH * (IS * 460.))
V3 = B5.49 * CP « UELP / (SUKTIMrtS • Pb) • Pulb)
VS = 85.49 • .84 • 9H0.732 / (SliHll ^rt.BU • e^.Ju) * 2e!. = 110. 1<4 M'S
STACK bAS VOLUMETRIC FLO* AT STALK CONUIMUNb
US = VS « AS • 3bOU/lU.J ) ) / I T I • VS«PS*ON*I)N)
30.00»( .8«0/ 13.6 ) ) / ( 70. +460.)))
iso s ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = ioo.ee PERCENT
13?. * 110.14 • 29.34 •
PAHTICULATk LOADING -- EPA METHUU b (A I STAUUAKU CUNUIUUMS)
CS = 0.001 * MM • 15.43 / VHSTU
CS = 0.001 * 194.9 • lb.43 / 66.b6b = .04bd U«/USC»-
PAHT1COLATE LHS/MR -- EPA METHOD 5
PMK = CS • USSTO / (15.43 • 453.6)
PMH = .U452 • 7525401. / (lb.«3
-------
FIELD 0»T»
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEC. F)
BAR. PRESS. (IN.HG)
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20)
FILTER NUMRER(S)
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
METER CALIB. FACTOR
READ ft RECORD DATA EVERY
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS
ASARCO
N0
-------
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA « RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT- NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
ASARCO SCHEFFEL
TEST PASM-3
NO* SECONDARY EXHAUST
ENGLISH UNITS , METRIC UNITS
TEST
Ttf
TF
TT
NP
Y
ON
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, HIN.
NET SAMPLING POINTS
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
01/22/83 01
955 955
1930 1930
00.0 00.
6 6
.968
.120 IN 3.
.8a
.56 IN-H20 ia.
/22/«3
a
986
0 MM
ea
7 MM-
U1
DROP
VOLUME OF DRV GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VM3TD VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VLC TOTAL H20 COLLECTED IN
IMPINGERS AND SILICA GEL,ML.
VMC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BMO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMO MOLE FRACTION DRY CAS
PC02 PERCENT COZ BY VOL.. DRY
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOL.. DRV
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL.. DRV
PN2 PERCENT N2 BV VOL.. DRV
MD MOLECULAR MT-ORY STACK GAS
MMS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
22.750 CU-FT
.baa CII-M
63.5 F
22.536 SCF
5.6
.260 SCF
l.lb
.986
.00
20.90
.00
79.10
26.80
28.71
17.5
.636
5.6
.007
l.lb
.988
.00
20.90
.00
79.10
26.80
28.71
C
SCM
SCM
-------
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES Of STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
VS AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
AS STACK AREA
QSSTD STACK FLO* RATE, DRV*
OS ACTUAL STACK FLOM RATE
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MN FILTERABLE PART
MG. EPA 5
CS FILTERABLE PART
PMR FILTERABLE PART
EMISSION RATE
* 68 DEG F, 29.9Z IN.HG.
121.7
2827.
B19037B.
6600480.
102.2
62.4
29.70 IN-HR
-9.00 IN-H20
29.04 IN-HG
72. F
FPS
3D-IN
SCFM
»CFH
.0427 GH/DSCF*
49.997 LB/HR
754.3S MM-MG
-228.60 MM-H20
737.57 MM-HG
22. C
37.1 MRS
1.824 SU-M
231927. SCMH
243540. ACMH
102.2
62.4
97.793 MG/OSCM
22.68 KG/HP
I
M
O
-------
EXAMPLE PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS TfcST NO.PASM-3
NO3 SECONDARY EXHAUST
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VMSTD • (17.647 • VM • V • (PB » PM / 13.6)) / (TM » 460.)
17.647 • 22.750 * .988 * ( ?9.70 » .SAO / 13.6)
VMStO s ....................... —.......... . = 22.53h DSCF
( 64. » 460.)
VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VNC * .04707 • VLC
VWC s .04707 • 6. » .26 SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE IN STACK GAS
BWO a (100. « VHC) / (VMSTO » VWC)
> 100. • .26
jL BWO s .......... ...... = |. 16 PERCENT
O 22.536 * .26
-J
MOLE FRACTION OF DRY STACK GAS
FMO s (100. • BNO) / 100.
100. • 1.2
FMD * - — - ———-—— — — s .988
100.
AVERAGE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF DRY STACK GAS
MD a (PC02 • .44) » (P02 • .32) * (PN2 + PCU) • .28
MO s ( .00*44/100) » (20.9*32/100) * ((79.1* .0) * 28/100 = 28.84
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS
MWS s MD • (1. • (8WO/100)) » 18. * (BMO/IOO)
MWS s 28.84* (1. •( 1.16/100)) » tfl. * ( 1.16/100) s 28.71
-------
STACK GAS VELOCITY AT STACK CONDITIONS
DELP = SUM. OF THE SORT(VH • (TS * flfeO.))
VS = 85.49 • CP • DELP / (SORT(MWS • PS) • PNTS)
VS = »5.49 • .84 • 391.375 / (SORT( 28.71 * 29.01) * 8. = 121.67 FPS
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLON AT STACK CONDITIONS
OS = VS * AS • 3600/144
OS = 121.67 • 2827. 3600/144 = 8600080. ACFH
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLON AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
nSSTD * 17.647 • OS • PS • (1. - (BMO/100)) / (TS * 460.)
17.647 • 0600480. * 29.04 •(!.-( 1.16/100))
OSSTO = -.— ——..—-. — .-.. — - . —... —-.---— .. s 819037P. SCKH
( 72. » 460.)
> PERCENT ISOKINETIC
I
Q ISO s (305.50*(TS*460.))«((0.002669*VLC)«(VM*Y*(PB*(PM/13.6))/(TM»460.)))/(TT*VS*PS*DN*DN)
00
(305.5BM 72.«460.))«((0.002669* 6.)*( 22.750* ,988*( 29.70M .580/13.6))/( 64.4460.)))
ISO « — —— .... . s 102.16 PERCENT
40. • 121.67 • 29.04 * .120 • .12U
PARTICULATE LOADING — EPA METHOD 5 (AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
CS s 0.001 * MN • 15.43 / VMSTD
CS s 0.001 * 62.4 * 15.43 / 22.536 = .0427 GR/DSCF
PARTICULATE LBS/HR -• EPA METHOD 5
PMR = CS • 03STD / (15.43 • 453.6)
PMR = .0427 • 0190378. / (15.43 * 453.6) a 49.997
-------
Kit LI) HAT A
VO
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP.(OEK.F)
BAR. PRESS. (IN. HG)
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20)
FILTER NUMBER(S)
STACK INSIDE OIM.(TN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
METER CALIB. FACTOR
ASAPCO TACdMA
NU 4
PART
DO
55.
29.53
00000
MAHK
60.
.84
SFC EXHAUSI
SIZE-SK IM
OA1F
HUM N
PKUHt
UMHKtf
Li. Mr, TM R trp^
HM/7LF.
Ill
00 .00
ASSIIM
S«KPL
MHTF.H
MF UM
PWUHt
Fli Mil]
I- mix
mix N
HFAO
: I.D.
sum?
i'JUuHEU
IICMI- H
DIFF .
HtATFW SF TTING
HFATEH HIIX
.000
.980
READ » RECURD DATA EVERY 5.0
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER
POINT
NO.
INIT
TIME TIME
(MIN.) (24-HR
r i nr tt \
LL UCK }
0 907
S.O 0
10.0 0
15.0 0
15.6 923
20.0 0
25.0 0
30.0 0
35.0 0
40.0 0
45.0 0
50.0 0
55.0 0
59.0 1154
65.0 1206
65.0 1544
70.0 0
75.0 0
60.0 0
65.0 0
67.4 1606
67.4 812
95.0 0
100.0 0
106.2 811
106.2 917
111.2 0
116.2 0
121.2 0
123.4 934
123.4 1013
READING
(CU.FT.)
288.717
292,200
295.590
299.030
299.413
302.440
305.890
309.350
312.780
316.240
319.690
323.180
326.660
329.425
333.534
341.070
344.530
347.980
351.430
354.870
356.472
367.663
372.840
376.240
360.410
393.781
397.180
400.590
404.000
405.438
418.760
CFM ii .0 IM.HC;
MINUTES
VELOCITY UHIFICE PRESSUPF.
HEAD DIFFERENTIAL
(IN.H20) (IN.HPO)
DESIRIH ACTUAL
4,500
4.500
4.450
4.500
4.650
4.700
4.650
4.700
4.700
4.700
4.700
4.650
4.500
4.500
4.450
4.100
4.100
4.150
4.100
4.100
4.450
4.400
4.400
4.400
4.600
4.650
4.700
4.700
4.400
4.600
.63
.63
.63
.63
.b3
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.6.3
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.6 <
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
.63
STACK
TEMP
(OEG.F)
DkY GAS
TFMP
(DEC,.
METE*
F)
SETTING
PUMP
VACUUM
(M.HG)
01/18/83
PSSS-1
6* STtFL
.132
1.0
FH9
r'.OH
0.
0.
IHPACTUR ifPlfcGER
if *
(DEG.F
P TM'P
) (DFIi.M
1NLF.T OUTLET
70.
72.
72.
73.
79.
79.
77.
80.
83.
82.
7V.
75.
80.
79.
77.
"5.
75.
84.
"9.
79.
77.
73.
70.
68.
78.
79.
72.
Bb.
73.
78.
52.
53.
S7.
60.
53.
53.
56.
59.
62.
h4.~
66.
67.
*9.
66.
5V.
SM.
60.
*>2.
h5.
67.
S9.
Stl.
S3.
S6.
»>•?.
60.
hi .
63.
6S.
*2.
57.
57.
58.
58.
60.
60.
60.
60.
60.
M.
*2.
63.
63.
65.
60.
63.
63.
h3.
63.
64.
hO.
S3.
54.
54.
*2.
hO.
61).
hU.
M .
S3.
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.3
i>.<4
2.4
2."
?.t
70.
72.
72.
73.
70.
79.
77.
60.
83.
P2.
79.
75.
80.
7V.
77.
HS.
75.
«4.
89.
79.
77.
73.
70.
6fl.
78.
79.
7?.
85.
73.
7«.
S7.
47.
47.
47 .
49.
4B.
46.
47.
4H.
«?.
5f>.
53.
53.
53.
53.
53.
53.
53.
-------
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
READ * RECORD OATA
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK
POINT TIME TIME
NO. (M1N.) (2fl-M«
TOTALS
AVERAGE
125.2 1015
125.2 10)1
130.? 0
132. fc 1039
152. fe
ASAMco TACHMA n«it OI/II/H;
NO M;.F) ( 1 1 . H(, ) (|)Fi;.F) (Dkn.F)
llFSIkfl) ACTUAL INl.tT IMIH.tt
020. 00« «.t>00 1.65 l.hj H7. SI. S3. 2.2 07. 54.
• 27.IOB O.bOO l.M I.h3 79. h,?. f, ) . i.f TO. 5«.
• 30.550 O.hSO I.M I.h3 ««. »-S. >.S. 2.2 Bfl. S«.
•32.220 O.hSO l.fcj 1.6? 70. h7. ^S. ^.^ 70. • 5«.
98.519
1.6! I.h3 76. »>0. ho. 2.2 7H. 51.
PERCENT ISOKtNETIC
III.7
-------
>
I
TACOMA
NO 0 SEC EXHAUST
01/18/83
PSSS-1
no
25.OC
PLANT * CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
HUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. MG)
NOZZLE:i.D.(IN.)
METER HEAD RIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING s 1.6073F-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE SI
STAGE INDEX NUMBER 1
050 (MICROMETERS) P.26
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 16.30
MG/D3CM/3TAGE 5.916*00
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN D50 85.33
AT
FI.OMHATK ( ACt-'M)
inw cnwi) i i IIINS
n »f .
77.7F
UA3 C"MPIIK1
77. If
29.53
28.7?
.132
1.630
SAMPLING
1 .76S1F-0? r.k/DSCF
2 3
7.29 0.70
8.70 8.30
3.15E»00 3.01E«-0<>
77.50 70.03
3.00
0.20
1.52E»00 I.96F»0() 2.39*.
66.25 61.39 55.05
Ty (UK/CO
lAM.MICRMS
N t PK RCENT ) : t(i2
CO
N2
02
H20
I"N(M1N.)
*.7fi9fcE»Ol MR/ACM
S5 36 37
S 6 7
62 .77 .50
00 6.60 16.50
1.00
100. 'i
.00
.00
99. (HI
.00
1.00
132.60
0.03<
SB
8
.28
18.00
*6E«oi MG/DSCM
FILTER
9
26.70
00.59
6.67E»00
20. 03
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (M6/OSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (6R/DSCF) SMALLER THAN P50
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/OLOGO (MG/DSCM)
DN/OLOGO (NO. PAHTICLES/OSCM)
3.22E»01
3.«5t»01
1.01E-02
1.5IE-02
2.87E»OI
5.05E+00
0.39E»05
2.92E«OI 2.60E»OI 2.50E*01 2.3IE«01 2.09t»01 1.53E»01 9.06t*00
3.13E»01 2.83E»01 2.68E+01 2.0flf«oi 2.20E»01 1.60E»Ol 9.71E«00
1.2HE-02 1.15E-02 1.09E-02 1.01E-02 9.I3E-U3 6.69E-V3 3.96E-03
1.37E-02 1.20E-02 I.I7E-02 1.08E-02 9.79E-03 7.17E-03 O.^OE-03
7.76E*00 5.8SE*00 3.76E»00 2.21E»00 1.12E»00 6.05E-OI 3.91E-01 2.0!E-01
5.79F.*01 1.5«E»01 7.80E»00 7.33E*00 7.02E*00 3.«2E»01 2.39£»OI 3.21E«01
2.37E»Ofl I.51E»08 2.81E+OH 1.30h*09 1.01E+10 2.72E»11 7.60E*11 7.61E»12
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 OEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HEHE ACCORDING td TH^ TASK t;R(IIIM UN LUNG
-------
ro
IACOMA
NO 4 SEC EXHAUST
01/18/83
PSSS-1
on
PLANT * CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
HUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP. 77.7F 25.4C
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG) 29.53
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG) 28.72
NOZZLEU.o.(IN.) .132
METER HEAD DIFF. 1.630
CALC. MASS LOADING = l.f.473F-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE SI
STAGE INDEX NUMBER 1
D50 (MICROMETERS) 6.34
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 16.30
MG/OSCM/STAGE 5.91E+00
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 85.33
| AtFM)
Al IMPAC10W CONDITIONS
IMP A CHIP Tt^P.
PAHUCLF MKNSITY(r;M/CC)
MAX.PAHTirLt IHAM.MICWI'S
GAS COMPUSI T ION fHFRCK'JT ) i
CIV
CO
N?
u?
H20
77. 7F ?5.0C
1.00
1 00. (I
.00
.00
99.00
.00
1 .00
1 .76536
S^
a
7.37
H.70
3. |SE«0(I
77.50
SAMPLING I)IIWATIUN(M|N.)
-0? r,H/ltSCF
S3 S4
3 03
5.94F»00 3.84E»(>0 2.29b»00 I.2IF.»00 7.26E-01 4.75E-01 2.57E-01
1.60E+OI 7.97F»00 7.60E*00 7.95E»00 «
1.46E»Ofl 2.69E»OM 1.21E+09 8.67t»09 <
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS APE CALCULATED HEKF ACCtlHlHMU TO
-------
1MPACTUH FIELD DAT* TABULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TFS1 TEAM
ASARCU TACOMA nil
TEST PSSS-I
NO « SEC EXHAUST
TEST
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
P1TOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
ENGLISH UNITS
01/IB/B3
907
103<»
13?. b
.980
.13? IN
.BO
1.63 IN-H2U
METHIC UNITS
01 /I H/IM
907
10*9
t 1?.b
.980
.1. a MM
.HO
ai .0 MM-I
DROP
VH VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTO VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BHO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMO MOLE FRACTION DRY G»S
MD MOLECULAR tiT-DRY STACK GAS
MMS MOLECULAR WT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ARS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
98.519 CU-M
60.1 f
97.127 SCF
.981 SCF
1.00
.990
38.73
2B.62
?9.53 IN-HH
-11.00 IN-H2U
28.1£ IN-Hi;
7fl. F
lOO.OH ACF
S. 790 CI«-M
1b.6 C
SCM
.028
1.00
.990
n. 7 3
750.06 MM-HG
-279.
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC 111.7 111.7
NT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES 1.715 RR 111.100 MC
PO PARTICLE DENSITY .06 flM/CJ 1.00
• 68 DE6 F, 29.92 IN.HG.
I
M
M
*>.
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
LEADhH
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCU TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/1A/H3
TEST
(IU
PUN Ml)
PbSS-1
SAV'PLl LOCAI ION
I1" t SHL t XHAUST
CALC. MASS LOADING
10TAL MASS (IF PAH1ICLKS DIVIDED MY A VULUMt. UNITS CIVtN AWE GHAINi
ACTUAL* CUHIC HUlT (GX/ACF ) .GNAINS Pf H OWY STAND AhM* • CUM 1C FOOT ((-.W /ObCF ) ,
MILLIGHAMS HEW ACIUAL CUHIC ME 1 h H (Mr;/ »C") AMI) MLLU'MACS PtM 1>MV bT»NI»A«U
CUBIC MF itw («r./nscM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(GR'ACF) s MT(GR) / IF(ACF)
CML = 1.715 / lOa.OHl =
CML(GR/OSCF) s MT(GR) / VHSTD(I)SCF)
CML = t .715 / 97. \?_1 -
CML(MGXACM) s MT(MG) / IF(ACM)
CML = til.100 / £.407 =
CML(MG/OSCM) x MT{MG) / VMSTDCOSCM)
CML = 111.100 / ?.750 =
Gt =
5.91
THE PERCENTAGE tlF TMF TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLtH
IN OIAMETEW THAM THt COMHE SPONDI N(; DbO IMDICATtK
FOR THAT STAbb
CUM X (b) =
MASS(B) * MASS(9)
MT (KG)
Ih.SO + 10.00 +
111.10 (MR)
100 =
• 100 =
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PAM1CLIS SMALLER IN
1HAN TMF CURHF SPUNOINi: 050. MASS/VOLUMfc UNITS APF_ ^r.
MG/r>SCM,GH/ACF ,r,H/l)SCF .
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(MGXACM) (5) = MASS(fc) •» MASS(7) » MASS(6) » MASStV)
IF(ACM)
CUM.(MG/ACM) dt = 6.60 » 16.SO » IH.Ud 4
?."S (ACM)
CEO.MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS) THE GF.OMETHIC MEAN DIAMETER IN
FOK A PAKTICULAW SlAlif.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
6EO.MEAN OIA.(J) = SURT( 050(J) * I)SO(J-I))
GEO.MEAN DIA.(b) = SDHT( .B5 * 1.70) =
DM/OL06D(MG/D3CM)
DM IS MG/OSCM/STAGE(J) AND DLOGO IS LOG I 0 (I)SO (J-l ) /
OSO(J)) hHERt J IS TMK CORHESPONUING STAGE NUMBER.
FOR STAGE I THE MAXIMUM PAHTICLt OIAMEIFH IS USED.
FON STAGE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) THE HSO IS ASSUMED AS
.5 * D50 OF STAGt 8.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
OM/OL060(J) = MG/OSCM/STAGE(J)
LUG( OSO(J-l) / 050(J))
OM/OLOGO (3) = 3.01
LOG( 7.37 / a. 78 )
16.03
UN/OLOGO THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES PER UNIT VOLUME FOW A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
UN/OLOGOU) = OM/OLOGDU)
5.83599F-10 « PD(r,M/CC) • GEO.MEAN I) I A . ( J )
DN/OLOGD (3) = 16.03
5.235999E-10 * I.Oil • 5.9
-------
FIELD DATA
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP.(OEG.
BAR. PRESS. (IN. HG)
ASAHCO TACOMA
NO 0
PAHT
no
F) 55.
30.00
src FX
SI/E-SK1M
IIATF
HIIN NUMHEH
PWDME
NiU/LE
Lf Nf, IH
:
ASSIIMF.il MIMS1
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) -9.00
FILTER NUMPEM(S)
STACK INSIDE 01M.(
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
MACK
IN) bO.
.80
.000
III
00 .00
CFM a) .0 If:. Hi;
SAMPLE
MF It- W
ME HH
PHOHE
Hfc A TfcR
HIJX Ml
HI'* MIN
Mt AH 01
HF.ATE"
mix st
* TYP(-
1 ,\l .
IIHE
MHf- R
Hb^f
(-'(• .
SE TTING
TT ING
01 /20/K3
PSSS-2
b ' STt t-L
.13?
1 .0
FH9
2.0t>
0.
0.
METER CALI8. FACTOR .980
READ » RECORD DATA
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK
POINT TIME TIME
NO. (MIN.) (20-HR
INIT 0 1005
5.0 G
7.4 1052
9.7 1056
15.2 1106
15.2 1025
16.5 1027
21.5 0
25.7 1000
20.2 1538
30.7 0
01.9 1555
01.9 1655
06.5 1700
50.0 1708
EVERY 5.0
GAS METEH
READING
(CO. FT.)
506.973
510.230
511.738
513.187
516.781
530.989
531.806
535.100
537.800
539.102
502.010
509.658
559.317
562.187
560.921
MIMITf S
VELOCITY DHIFlCf PHESSUHE
HEAP IllFFEHFNTIAL
(IN.H20) (IN.M2U)
HESIHFP ACTUAL
.950 l.«3
.950 .03
.700 .03
.700 .03
.850 .03
.900 .03
3.900 .03
3.900 .03
3.850 .03
0.050 .03
4.050 .03
3.850 .03
3.700 .03
3.700 .03
.53
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
STACK
TEMP
(DKC.F)
PKY GAS M
TFMP
(DEIJ.F
ETKR PUMP
IMPACTOH IKPINOEH
VACUUM IF
) (I
M.HG) (I)F.G.
HP TEMP
M (UEI..F)
INLET OUTLET
hO.
*0 .
70.
70.
70.
«e.
77.
70.
70.
75.
71.
75.
75.
91.
50.
55.
5b.
55.
56.
Sb.
55.
57.
S6.
50.
56.
56.
6U.
60.
57.
57.
S7.
S8.
59.
57.
^8.
59.
59.
hO.
60.
59.
*o.
60.
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
bO
6"
70
70
70
HH
77
70
70
75
71
75
75
91
06.
06.
07.
07.
07.
07.
09.
09.
50.
50.
50.
51.
51.
52.
TOTALS
AVERAGE
50.0
30.081
.03
1.03
70.
5b.
59.
2.0
70.
09.
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
110.5
-------
PLANT & CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. H6)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEtl.D.UN.)
METER MEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING a 3.2079E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STA6E
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS) 6
>
^ MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 9
M
00 MG/03CM/STAGE 9
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 87
ASARCO TACUMA
NO 4 SEC F.X
01/20/83
PSSS-2
no
74.4F
10.00
29.34
.132
1.430
l"p*tTUH FLi'hHATE < ACFM)
AT IKPACTtIN CONDITIONS
H.MP.
23.6C
. 4F
PARTICLE DfcNSI TY(t;M/CC)
MAX.PAkTICLK OIAM.MICHOS
I,AS Ct>MPOSIT10N(PFWCE'>UMATIUN(MIN.)
SI
1
.30
.55E+00
,48
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN DSD
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DLOGD (MG/DSCM)
DN/OLOGO (NO. PART ICLE V03CM)
b,
b.70E*01
2.81E-02
2.93E-02
8.99E»00
6.
s^
5.bO
5.75t*00
79.95
5.B7M01
b.l2K*Ol
2.5bE-02
2.b7E-02
8.15E»00
GH/USCF
S3
sa
4.94
8.20
b8.91
J.lfi
b5.95
7. .i4oeE»oi MR/ACM
35 Sb S7
5 b 7
1.71 .82 .57
b.OO 7.80 Ib.OO
.709
1 .00
100.11
.00
.00
99.00
.00
I .00
50.40
7.b542E»oi MG/DSCM
SB FILTER
8 9
.31
12.30
l.bflfc'Ol 1
25.84 9.29
b.90
7.08E*00
3.72E+OH
S7.87 47.38
5.0bE»01 U.H«E»01 4.2SE+01 3.4BE+01 1.90E»01 b.H2E+00
5.27E»Ol 5.0«>E»01 4.
-------
VD
23. 6C
PLANT * CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
HAR. PRESS. (IN. HG)
STACK PRESS. (IN. MR)
NOZZLEII.O.dN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING = 3.aOT9E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE SI
STAGE INDEX NUMBER 1
050 (MICROMETERS) 8.76
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 9.30
MG/OSCM/STAGE 9.55E*00
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 H7.0B
ASARCO TACOMA
NO « SEC EX
01/20/8?
PSSS-2
on
70. OF
30.00
?9.3«
.132
i.«so
H.'lhR A f
AT tMPArlllH CnNIM 1 II'MS
JMPACTUH U^P.
PAKTJCLE OEMS M Y ((.M/CC )
»IA x .PAM1 ICI.F 01 AM.KICMUS
I.AS cuMpiisi T KIN (PI- HCM^T ) :
r.?«OHe»()| MG/ACM
55 Sb S7
S t> 7
1.7«» .90 .65
6.00 7.80 16.00
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/DSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DL06D (MG/DSCM)
DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLE9/DSCM)
6.02E+01
b.70E»01
2.81E-02
2.93E-02
2.96E»01
9.03E«00
6.65E*05
SAMPLING DUHATIUMMK*.)
3.30a9t-02 GM/OSCF
S2 S3 S4
2 3 4
7.70 5.02 3.21
5.60 8.20 2.20
5.75E«(Hl 8.02E*00 2.2bE»oil 6.1bt»00 B.01E»00
79.95 68.91 65. 9S 57.87 07.3fl ?5.80
5.87E+01 5.06E«01 U.eaE+OI a.2SF+01 3.08E»01 1.90E+UI 6.82E+00
h.l?E+01 5.27E«Ul 5.05E«t'l a.0^t»01 3.63E«01 l.«»8t»01 7.11E*00
2.56E-02 2.21E-02 2.12E-U2 1.86t-02 1.52E-02 8.29E-U3 2.9Hf03
2.67E-02 2.30E-02 2.21E-02 1.90E-02 1.5«E-02 «.60t-03 3.I1E-03
8.23F.»on 6.23t*on a.0.
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD DATA 1ABULAUON
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LtADFK
ASARCO TACOMA DO
TEST PS8S-2
TEST DATE
NO a SEC EX
ENGLISH UMTS
01/20/83
METWIC UNITS
NJ
O
DROP
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VHC VOLUME OF NATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BMO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MO MOLECULAR HT-ORY STACK GAS
MHS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ARS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
34.081 CU-FT
ST.6 F
34.281 SCF
,3«6 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
30.00 IN-Hi:
-9.00 IN-H2U
29.30 IN-HG
74. F
35.74 ftCF
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
1045
1708
5P.4
.980
.132 IN
.84
1.43 IN-H2U
10<»5
1708
50
3
?b
.980
3.4 MM
.84
!b.J MM-H20
) Ctl-M
14.2 C
.971 SCM
.010 SCM
1 .UO
.990
28.73
782.00 MM-HG
•228.bO MM-M.20
745.19 MM-Hli
24. C
1.01 ACM
AS
STACK AREA
2827.
SO-IN
1.824
-------
ISO PEHCENT ISOKINETIC
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES
PD PARTICLE DENSITY
• 60 OEG f, 29.92 IN.HG.
HO.5
J.I 17 PH
.Ob (JH/CI
110.-1
7<4. 50(1 MI;
l.on i;«
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCDLAHDNS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCD TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/20/83
TEST TEAM LEADER
DO
WIIN NU
PSSS-2
SA^Ml.t L'lt A I HIM
M) tt SKC f X
CALC. MASS LOADING
ro
to
TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES DIVIDED BY A VULONt. UNITS GIVf.N ARF GRAlNb PER
ACTUAL* CUBIC FDllT (GH/ACF ) ,f,RA IMS PF.R f)W» S1ANDARO«« CIIWIL FUfl t ( GR/OSCF ) ,
MILLIGRAMS PE» ACTUAL CUBIC MF TFW(MG/ACM) AMD MILL tr.*A».-s PF.X ORY STANOAMU
CUBIC MFTF.H(Mr,/IISCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(GR/ACF) r MT(GH) / IF(ACF)
CML s 1.107 /
CML(G»/OSCF) s MT(GR) / VHSTDtDSCF)
CML s 1.107 /
CML(MG/ACM) * MT(MG) / IF (ACM)
CML = 70.300 /
CML(MG/DSCM) = MT(MG) / VMSTD(OStM)
CML = 70.300 /
30.281 =
1.012 =
.971 s
UR/ACF
.0350 r,k/l)SCF
Mb/USCM
050 (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PAHUCLES ON E«CM STAGE ASSIIMINP, A SO PKRCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE *ASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
M6/OSCM/STAGE
THE MASS LOADING FUR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CUHIC METER F"U« EACH ST AKfc (MR/I1SCM/S T AiJt )
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/OSCM/STAGFU) = MASS(l) / VMSTD(OSCM)
MG/DSCM/STAGEU) = 9.30 /
CUM. PERCENT OF
.971 =
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THF COKHESPIINDINb D^P INDICATED
FOR 1HAT STAGF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM X (6) = MASS(7) * MASS(B) » MASS(9)
MT (MG)
CUM Z (6) e Ift.OU * 12.30 * h.90
70.30 (MR)
• 100 =
• 100 = 57.87
-------
I
M
U)
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE ciiMtiLAtivE M»SS LOADING (IF fAhiici.ES SMALLER IN
TH*N !HE CHRRESMIK'lilNr. l>50. MA SS / vilLHMt UN I t b AW|- M.
M<,/I>SCM,GH/ACF
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(MR/ACM) (5) = MASS(fc) * MASSC7) » M»SS(8) » MASSCO
IF l»CM)
CUM.(MR/ACM) (5) = 7.80 » Ib.UO » 13.30 *
^^•^••^••^"^^••"•"^^•••^•^^••••^ — • — »^«
1.01 (ACM)
GEO.MEAN OIA.(MICROMETERS)
THE GEUMETHIC MEAN OIAMETEW IN «ICKIIME IF.KS
FOW A PAHtlCULAH S1AC.F..
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
GEO.ME*N DIA.(J) = SORT( 050(J) *
GEO.MEAN oiA.(t>) =
DM/DLOGD(MG/OSCM)
1.79) =
t .
()M IS MG/OSCM/STA(;t(J) AND OLOGO IS LOG t U (OSO (J-I ) /
U50(J)) hHfcBt J IS tHE CURRESPUNDINr, STAGE NUMBE* .
KOH STAGE I THE M4XIMIIM PARTICLF. DIAMETf'N IS USED.
FOR STAGE <» (BACKUP FILTER) THE USO IS ASSUMED »S
.5 • 050 OF STAGE 8.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
OM/OLOGIMJ) = MG/OSCM/STAGE(J)
LUG(
P50U))
OM/OLOGO (1) =
LOG(
8.
7.7a
ao.87
S.<^
THE NUMBER OF PAhtlCLFS PER UNIT VOLUME F (IH A STAGE.
ON/DLOGD
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
UN/DLOGD(J) = DM/DLUGU(J)
5.23599F-10 • PIKGM/CC) • GEO.MEAN I) I » . ( J )
ON/DLOGO (3) = qa.87
10 * 1.00 • b.i>3
• CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
•* CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
b6 OEG.F AND 89.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
<^^.«48
-------
F itui) DATA
I
M
NJ
PLANT ASAHCU IACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NU 4 SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PAHT SIZE-SKIM
OPERATOR DO
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEC. F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN. HG) 29.70
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) -9.00
FILTER NUMBER(S) MARK III
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM » .0 IM.Hb
METER CALIB. FACTOR .980
READ ft RECORD OATA EVERY 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER VELOCITY (1HIFICE PRESSURE
POINT TIME TIME READING HEAD DIFFERENTIAL
NO. (MIN.) (24-HR (CU.FI.) (IN.H2U) (IN.H2U)
DESIRED ACTUAL
INIT 0 955 602.112
5.1 1000 605.409 4.500 .61 .61
7.2 1007 606.826 4.450 .61 .61
10.8 1014 609.200 4.500 .61 .61
11.6 1142 609.705 3.850 .61 .61
13.4 1146 610.900 3.850 .61 .61
16.5 1153 612.973 3.900 .61 .61
20.8 1201 615.890 3.800 .61 .61
20.6 1626 623.048 3.900 .61 .61
25.6 0 626.550 3.500 .61 .61
29.1 1635 620.738 3.500 .61 .61
29.1 1720 633.577 3.850 .61 .61
36.0 0 638.370 3.350 .61 .61
39.0 1730 640.409 3.400 .61 .61
DATE
HUN NIIHHEH
HHUBE LK.Nf, tH K. TYPE
Nt'/7LE : 1.0.
• SSHMF.li MfUSTIIHK
SAMPLE HU* MUMHKh
Mf TEH HUX NIIKHEH
ME TEH HE AD D JFK .
PHUBE HEATEH StMING
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
68.
75.
72.
83.
7h.
76.
74.
75.
73.
7h.
75.
/h.
77.
HE ATE« IMIX SE IT ING
UKY GAS METEH PUMP
TEMP VACUUM
(DEG.F) (1N.HG)
I ME I OUTLET
43. 49. 2.0
44. 49. 2.2
'15. 50. 2.2
50. S3. 2.2
17. 53. 2.2
«7. 53. 2.2
40. S5. 2.2
50. 54. 2.2
S3. 55. 2.2
Sh. S6. 2.2
50. S4. 2.2
S5. SH. 2.2
59. S9. 2.2
»M /22/MJ
PSSS-3
6* STEEL
. 132
1.0
FB9
2.H0
0.
0.
IMPACTUH IMPINGES
IE*
(DEG.F
60.
75.
72.
03.
76.
76.
74.
75.
73.
7h.
75.
76.
77.
P TEHH
) (OEb.F)
47.
47.
48.
4fl.
48.
50.
51.
52.
52.
52.
54.
54.
55.
TOTALS
AVERAGE
39.0
26.300
I .61
1 .61
75.
50.
54.
75.
51
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
111.0
-------
N)
cn
PLANT « CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLE>I.D.(IN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING = 2.6551E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS)
ASARCU TACUMA
NO a SEC FX
01/22/83
PSSS-3
no
75. \f 23.9C
29.70
29.oa
.133
1.610
SI
I
8.63
f. (At.FM)
A I IKPAC TlIK tONPI 1 IONS
.717
7b.lF
PAHMTLF OtNS! TY(GM/CC)
MAX.PAWT n;il:. DIAM.KICUIIS
GAS C11MMHS1T l()N(Pf KCtNT ) :
CfV
Cn
N2
02
H20
1 .00
100.11
.00
.00
9Q.no
.CO
1 .00
S2
7.6?
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 7.90
MG/DSCM/STAGE 1.05fc»Ul
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 05U 83.58
1
1
h.tl7
35
5
.70
.80
jHc^Ol Mliy
S6
b
.HI
5.00
'ACM
S7
7
.57
13.00
6.40t
s«
8
.30
10.40
J3E*01 MG/DSCM
FILTER
9
5.70
72E»()P
75
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (GR/DSCF) SMALLER THAN DSO
GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGD (MG/DSCM)
DN/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DSC*)
5.08E*01
5.J
2.i
2.^
2.94E»01
9.86E»00
7.<
3
77
2.06t-0?
. 111*00
.83F*01
SAMPLING DIIPAT KIN (M tN. )
U2 GR/OSCF
S3 SO
3 4
.00 1.50
O.OOE*00 1.99E»00 2.3"
77.75 70.64 70.B9
4.72E»01 4.53E»01 4.31t*01 3.68E*01 2.03E»01
0.98E»01 4.78E*Ol 4.5«E»OI 3.BHt»Ot 2.14E*OI 7.59E*00
2.06E-0? 1.98h-02 1.B8E-02 l.blt-0? 8.69E-03 3.15E-03
2.1*E-U2 2.09E-0^ 1.99E-02 1.69E-02 9.37E-03 3.32E-03
6.12E»00 3.93K»00 2.3IE*00 1.1HE*00 b.tfOt-Ul 4.I5E-01
O.OOE*00 1.02E*01 8.9ME*00 c?.07F.*Ol I.11E*02 5.05F. + 01 2.51E*01
O.OOE + 00 3.2?t»0« I.S9t*09 «».«3E*10 b.77E*ll
6.b4E*00 1.73E»01 1.38E«Ol 7.57E»00
60.50 33.47 11.85
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS AKE CALCULATED HEI*E ACCORDING Tit THE TASK GWOI'P UN LUNG liYNAMtCS.
-------
M
to
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEII.D.UN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING a 2.6551E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
DSO (MICROMETERS) 0
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 7
MG/DSCM/3TAGE 1
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN DSO 03
ASARCO TACUHA
NO n SEC EX
01S22/03
PSSS-3
00
75.IF 23.9C
39.70
29.04
.132
1.610
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN OSO
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN OSO
CUM. (GR/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEU. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DLOGO (MG/DSCM)
ON/RLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DSCM)
SI
1
,7?
,90
,05E»01
.SB
,08E»01
,3«fc-02
,95E»OI
,90E*00
,356*05
S2
7.70
2.80
3.7?E»00
77.75
4.72E»01
4.98F»01
2.06E-02
2.IBE-02
».19E»no
b.90E«01
2.40E»0»
S3
3
5.On
.00
A 1 1 MPAT 1
MAKTKLK
MAX .HAH1 1
FLUMHATb (ACFM)
IIIH CONDITIONS
TKMH. 7S.1F
ntNSlTMGM/tC)
ICLE IlIAM.MICHn.S
MS U'MPMSl TIllNCHfcKCbNM : C08
SAMPLINI;
CF
34
a
3.22
1.50
CO
Hi
U2
H20
l)IJHATinN(MIM. )
»>.0758E»01 MG/ACM
S5 Sfc S7
5 h 7
1.78 .89 .b5
l.HO 5.00 13. 00
.71 /
23. 91.
1.00
100.0
.00
.00
99.00
.00
1.00
39.00
d.406
S8
8
.38
10.40
i3t»oi MG/DSCM
FILTER
9
5.70
I.73E*Ol I.3BE*OI 7.57E»00
33.17 11.85
O.OOE»()0 l.99t + (IO 2.39t*0»
77.75 74.61 70.09 80.50
4.72E+U1 1.53E+01 4.31E«01 3.68E+01 2.03E«Ol 7.20t»00
4.9BF.»01 a.7Bt*Ol 4.b4F.»01 3.8«t»01 2.10E»01 7.59K»00
2.06E-02 1.9BE-U2 1,8«t-02 I.61E-02 8.89E-03 3.15E-U3
2.18E-02 2.09t-02 1.99t-02 I.b9t-02 9.37E-03 3.32t-03
6.20E*00 t.Olf.+Ol) 2.39fc»oO l.c!6E.+0<> 7.5«>E-0| 4.97E-OI
O.OOE*00 l.OflF + Ol 9.29E»00 2.21E*01 1.20t*ll2 b.03t*(M
0.onE*00 3.09t»(»» I.29E*09 2.I1E«10 5.41t*M 9.39E*1I 2.«4t»I2
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO
-------
IMPACTOH FIELD OATA lAHULAltUN
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADEN
ASARCO TACOMA on
TEST PSS3-3
TEST DATE
NU a SEC EX
ENGLISH UNITS
01/22/M
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VMC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MD MOLECULAR HT-ORY STACK GAS
MNS MOLECULAR ftT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, A«S.
T3 AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
.268 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
2B.62
29.70 IN-HG
-9.00 IN-H20
29.«a IN-HG
75. f
27.96 ACF
METRIC UNITS
TB
TF
TT
Y
DN
CP
PM
VM
TM
VM8TO
TIME-START
TIME -FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST. MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
DROP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
955
1730
39
1
26
51
26
.0
.980
.132 IN
.80
.61 IN-H2U
.300 CU-FT
.7 F
.507 SCF
9S5
1730
39.0
.9HO
3.0
.80
00.9
.705
10.9
.751
MM
MM-H20
CU-M
t
SCM
.OOfl SCH
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
75«.3B MM.MI,
•228.60 MM-H2»>
737.57 MM-HI;
2a. C
.79 ACM
AS
STACK AREA
2827. SfJ-IN
1.82« SU-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC ltl.0 111.0
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES .74? f.H qH.IHO Ml
PO PARTICLE DENSITY .06 i;H/CI 1.00
• 68 OEG F, ^
-------
IMPACTPR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CAI.CIILAI IUNS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCO TACOMA
TEST DATE 0!/2?/83
TtST TEAM LEADf.R
no
RUN
SAMHLt LOCATIUM
fjn « src EX
CALC. MASS LOADING
\
M
ro
TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES DIVIDED HY A VULDMt. UNITS CIVEN AKE GRAINS PER
ACTUAL* CUHIC EOOT(GR/ACF).GRAINS PER DRY S T ANUAHI.i** CU'UC F 0(> \ (I,H /USCE ) ,
MILLIGRAMS Ptw ACTUAL CUBIC ME IEM(MI;/ACW) AND MILLIl;KA^s PEW OKY SIANUAMD
CUHIC ME TEH(M(;/DSPM. )
EXAMPLE CALCDLATIONS
CMLCGR/ACF) = MT(GH) / IF(ACF)
CML = .702 / 27.957 =
CML(GR/T)SCF) = MT(GR) / VMSTn(DSCE)
CML = , .702 / 2b.507 =
CML(MG/ACM) = MT(MG) / IF(ACM)
CML = 08.1UO / .792 =
CML(MG/OSCM) = MT(MG) / VMSTfMDSCM)
CML T Ofl.100 / .7M =
r,H/ACF
,02«0 t;H/DSCF
MU/DSCM
D50 (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF TMt PAVTICLES UN EACH STAGE ASSUMING A MI PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STARE COLLF.CTEO
MG/DSCM/STAGE
THE MASS LOADING FUR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY sTANOARn cubic METER FUR F.ACM STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/OSCM/STAGE(1) = MASS(l) / VMS TO(DSC*)
MG/OSCM/STAGEM ) = 7.90 /
.751 =
10.09
CUM. PERCENT OF M«SS
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER IHAN THE CORRESPOND I Ut, l>50
FOR THAT STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM X (ft) a M»ss(7) + MASS(A) » MAbSO)
MT (MG)
CUM I (6) = 15.00 * 10.00 » 5.70
08.10 (MG)
* tOO =
• 100 = 70.
-------
CUM. (MASS/VOLUME) tHt CUMULAim V*SS LEADING UF PAPMCLES SMALLER IN
?MAN THE COWKt SPI)Nl)|lS(«O
IF (ACM)
CUM.(MG/ACMI (5) = 5.00 » 13. on * lu.oo « -3.71;
= '43.07
.79 (ACM)
GEO.MEAN DIA.(MICROMETERS) THE GEOMETRIC MEAN DIAMETEH IN MICKHMFIFKS
FUR A PARTICULAR SIAUI-.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
GEO.MEAN DTA.U) = SORT( oso(j) * osuu-m
GEO.MEAN r>IA.(6) = SQRT< .69 * 1.7H) = i.?b
i
£ DM/OL060(MG/OSCM) DM IS MG/DSCM/STAGE(J) AND OLOGD IS LOUIo U)SO(J-I) /
O U50U)) WHERE J IS THf CORRESPONDING STAGE NUMBER.
FUR STAGE 1 THE MAXIMUM PARMtLE DIAMF. TF.R IS IISEU.
FOR STAGE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) I"E OSu IS ASSIiMEn AS
.5 • 050 OF STAGE H.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DM/DLOGOU) = MG/OSCM/STAGE(J)
LOG( D50(J-1) / MbO(J))
UM/OLOGD (3) = .00
LUG( 7.70 / 5.00 )
ON/OL060 THE NUMBER OF PARTICLFS PER UNIT VOLUME K>K A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DN/DLOGDU) = OM/DLOKIXJ)
5.23599F-IO • PDIGM/CC) * GF.O.MFAN DIA.(J)
DN/DLOGD (3) = .00
5.^3S999E-10 « 1.0" • h.tfu
* CALCULATED AT STACK CONDTlldNS
•• CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONOITIONS
66 DEG.F AND £9.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
-------
END OF PROGKAM
IFILE FTNIO a CIDROtDA.OLD
IFILE fTNI l=CIOHO£D*fOLD
:RUN CIORZPG:STACK=£OOOO
END OF PROGRAM
tFILE FTN08*CIOR03DA,OLO
tFILE FTN093CIOROOO»,OLD
tRUN CIOR4PG
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
RHOs t.OO GM/CC
MEAN CUMULATIVE UPPER CUNFTIHNCE
INTERVAL DIAMETER MASS CONCFNTHA1 ION LIMIT
(MICRONS) (MG/ACM) (MG/AL")
2.«7E*00
3.«2F«00
S.bfeE+OU
>
1
(-<
to
to
1 ,
2 i
3 <
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 i
28 i
29 i
30 i
31 J
32 I
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
?.50E-01
J.71E-01
S.95E-01
.20E-OI
.47E-01
.77E-01
.09E-01
.45E-01
.83E-01
.24E-OI
.69E-01
.18E-01
.71E-01
.28E-01
.91E-01
.58E-OI
.32E-01
.01E«00
.10E+00
.19E»00
.29E400
.41E+00
.53E«00
.6fcE*00
,80E»00
.95E400
>. 12E>00
».30E*00
>,50E+00
».71E*00
».95E*00
!.20E-»00
,47E»00
,77E»00
.09E»00
.45E»00
,83E»00
.24E>00
.69E+00
,18E»00
.71E*00
.28E»00
.91E»00
,58E»00
.32E»00
.01E»01
.10E»01
.19E»01
.29E+01
.41E«01
l.53E*01
L.bbE»01
3.00F»00
4.34E»00
S.1t>F»00
7.19E»00
9.85E*00
1.15E*01
1.34E+01
1.57E*01
2.12E«01
2.47E»01
2.83E»01
3.14E»01
3.40E»01
3.5»E»01
3.70E»01
3.7«E»01
3.80E»01
3.«8E»01
3.91E*01
3.94E*01
99E»01
,04E*oi
.07E*01
.09E»OI
.14E»01
,17E*01
.32E«01
.39E»01
.48E»01
,58E*01
.66E*01
,79E»01
,90E»01
5.02E*01
5.12E*01
5.22E»01
5.29E»01
5.3bE»01
5.43E*01
5.49E*01
5.54F.XI1
5.59E»01
6.24E*00
7.38F»OU
8.69F«00
. 19F»U1
,40E*Ot
.64E»01
2.24E»OI
2.58E*OI
2.95E»OI
3.2fcE»01
3.52E»01
3.70E*01
3.fl2E*01
3.91E«U1
3.971*01
4.01E*U1
4.07E«01
4.09E+01
4.12E*01
a,15E*01
4.18E+01
4.23E+01
4.25E»ot
4.27E*OI
a.3lE*oi
0.3<»E*01
0.3<>E»OJ
a.53E*oi
4.72E+01
a.83E*UI
o.9aE«ol
5.0t>E + OI
S.1HE»01
5.d9E»01
5.39fc»01
5.66E»01
S.71F*OI
5.75E»OI
CONFIf'tNCE
IMI T
S.O/t *UU
9,'iOE + OO
1 . IOE»01
I .««»E»01
1.73E*OI
3.57E*01
3.66E+01
3.75E»01
3.«IE*01
3.83t +01
3.86E+OI
3.89E*OI
3.9iE*01
3.98t»01
4.01E»0»
«.U7E*01
4. I2E*UI
4.I8E*OI
0.31E»OJ
U.OUF.+01
5.37F.»OI
-------
53 ' I.80E*01 5.63F+01 5.79E*<>1 5.««bE + U1
5a I.95E*01 5.hfiE»UI 5.«.«.»<'! b.«^f»ui
55 2.12E+01 5.69E»5 «.83E*OI 5.B5E«OJ b.03E«01 S.bHE*01
66 5.24E»Ol 5.87E*01 b.OME»01 ^.b4E»U1
67 5.69E + OI 5.8BF.*01 b.05F»(»l 5.70E*Ot
6S b.!6E*01 5.89E«OI b.0bf»01 5./!E»Ot
69 6.7IE+01 5.89E»01 6.07E«OI 5.7i£»OI
70 7.28E + 01 5.90E»OI f..07F*01 5.7JE«U1
71 7.91E»01 5.9IE*OI b.O«E»01 5.ME»OI
72 8.5BE«01 5.91E»01 b.O^E»01 5.7«E»«1
73 9.32E*01 5.9?F. + 01 b.O'iE + Ol 5.7SE*01
OJ
-------
ASAHCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
WHO* 1.00 GM/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER RECORDS EXCLUDED FROM MEAN
CUMILAT1VF MASS LONCt N !H A T ION
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
2
2
2
2
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
6
6
6
6
NONE
NONE
NONE
4
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
4
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
1 <
2 <
3 i
4 2
5
h
r
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ie
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 i
28 i
29 i
30 <
31 i
32 2
33 2
34 2
35 <
36 t
37 <
38 «
39 •
40 «
41 <
42 1
43 1
44 1
45 «
46
47
08
49
50
51
52
53
•.50E-01
J.T1E-01
5.95E-01
I.20E-01
.47E-OI
.77E-01
.09E-01
.45E-01
.83E-01
.24E-01
.69E-01
.18E-01
.71E-01
.28E-OJ
.91E-01
.58E-01
.32E-01
,01E»00
,10E»00
,I9E*00
,29E»00
,41E»00
.53E»00
«66E^OO
.80E»00
,95E»00
>.12E»00
».30E»00
».50E»00
>.71E»00
>.95E»00
J.20E*00
J.47E*00
I.77E»00
I.09E«00
I.45E*00
I.83E»00
>.24E»00
>.69E»00
>.18E+00
».71E»00
r.28E*00
p .91E+00
I.58E«00
>.32E»00
.01E»OI
,IOE*01
,19E»Ot
.29E»01
.41E»01
.53E»01
.66E»01
,80F.*01
-------
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
60
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
1.95E«01
2.12t»01
2.30E«01
2.50E»01
2.71E+01
2.95E*U1
3.20E+01
3.47E«01
3.77E*01
«.09E»01
fl.«5E»01
fl.83E»01
5.20E»01
5.69E»01
6.J6E»01
6.7JE+01
7.28E»01
7.91E»01
8.58E»01
9.32E»01
NONE
NONE
6
NONE
NONE
-------
RHOi
ASARCO AVERAGE
1.00 6H/CC
M
OJ
rERVAL DIAMETER MASS CONCENTR
(MICRONS)
1 2.50E-OI
2 2.7IE-01
3 2.95E-01
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
.20E-01
.47E-01
.77E-01
.09E-01
.45E-01
.83E-01
.24E-01
.69E-01
.18E-OI
.71E-01
.28E-01
.91E-01
.58E-01
.32E-01
,01E*00
,10E*00
.19E»00
,29E*00
.41E»00
.53E»00
.6bE»00
,80E»00
,95E*00
27 2.12E+00
28 2.30E+00
29 2.50E»00
30 2.71E+00
31 2.95E*00
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
.20E»00
.«7E»00
.77E*00
,09E»00
.45E+00
.83E»00
,24E»00
.69E*00
.IBEtOO
.71E+00
.28E«00
,91E»00
,58E*OU
,32E*00
.01E*OI
47 1.IOE*01
48 1.I9E+01
49 1.29E«01
50 l.aiE^OI
SI I.53E+OI
52 l.bfcE+OI
S3 I.80E»U1
(PERCENT )
4.2«E»00
5.24E»00
b . 3 3F *0 0
7 . 5WE * U 0
9.01E+00
1 ,07E»01
1 .25E + 01
1.47E*01
1.72E*01
2.01E*OI
2.34E+01
2.73E*01
3.19E*01
3.70E«01
4.30E«01
4.94E*(M
5.4BE»01
5.94E*01
6.25E»01
6.45E»01
6.60E+01
b.7IE+01
b.7flE*01
b.83E»01
6.87E*01
6.92E+OI
b.96E»01
7.01E»01
7.06E»01
7.10E*U1
7. 14E+OI
7.18E»01
7.23E»01
7.28E«01
7.35E»01
7.43E*01
7.54E*01
7.67E»01
7.82E»01
7.99E»01
8.16E»01
8.37E*01
8.56E*01
8.7bE*OI
8.94E*OI
. 1?F»0 1
,24E»0 1
,3SE»01
,47E»01
.SHE »oi
9,h7E»01
9.75E+01
Q.B?F +0 1
PARTICLE SIZE D1STHIHUTION
MEAN CUMULATIVE UPPER CONFIDENCE
UN LIMI I
(PEWCENT)
b.3'*E»00
7.b8E*00
9.1
1.52E«01
1.78E«dl
2.08E+OI
3.35E«»1
3.90E*01
5.14E»01
5,b9E»01
b. I4E«01
6.1bE*01
6.67F»01
b.83E»01
6.93E»01
7.01E*OI
7.0bE»01
7.10E»01
7.20E*U1
7.25E»01
7.29E»U1
7.33f*01
7.36E*01
B.83E»OI
9.03F»01
9.23F«01
9.41E*01
.46E«OI
.52E»01
,5«F»0|
,bbt»OI
,77E»01
7.91E»0|
8.07F»01
o.blEfdl
9.77F»OI
9.87E»OI
9.97F.*OJ
CDNFlOtNCE
LIMIT
5.21E««IO
7 . U 71» U 0
Milt
.bbE»01
?.bOE»0!
4.10t»OJ
4.7?E»OJ
5.2HE+OI
b.03E»Ot
b.25E+01
b.3HE»01
b.a«t»01
6.«>aE»01
b.b9t+01
6.73E«OI
b.7HE»01
b.83E»Ot
6.H7E+U1
6.95E»01
b.99E*UI
7.05E»UI
7.tIE«01
7.I9E»0»
7.30E*OI
7.«3E»OI
7.58F«OI
7.?
-------
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
I.95E+01
2.30E»01
2.50E+01
3.«?
.06E+0?
.06E*0^
,ObE«Oc;
9.b/fc*
-------
U>
..00
ASARCO AVERAGE
RHO= 1.00 6M/CC
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
INTERVAL 1
1 i
2 i
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 <
29 i
30 I
31 3
32 «
33 <
34 •
35 (
36 1
37 «!
>IAMET6R IH
J. 506-01
J. 956-01
.476-01
.096-01
.836-01
.696-01
.716-01
.916-01
.326-01
.106+00
.296+00
.53E+00
.806+00
.126+00
.506+00
.956+00
.476+00
.096+00
.836+00
.696+00
.716+00
.916+00
.326+00
.106+01
.296+01
.536+01
.806+01
». 126+01
'.506+01
!. 956+01
1.476+01
1.096+01
I.83E+01
i. 696 + 01
I.71E+01
.916+01
'.326+01
MEAN CHANGE
1 MASS CONCENTRATE
(MG/DNM3)
1.556+01
1.976+01
2.59E+OI
3.10E+01
1.18E+01
fc.lOE+01
8.216+01
1.146+02
8.426+01
3.986+01
2.126+01
9.506+00
7.626+00
8.126+00
6.34E+00
7.726+00
9.15E+00
1.196+01
2.05E+01
2.75E+01
3.166+01
3.296+01
3.05E+01
1.66E+01
1.92E+01
1.44E+01
1 .08E + 01
7.656+00
5.726+00
6.I9E+00
5.196+00
4.23E+00
3.53E+00
2.88E+00
2.40E+00
1.9HE+00
1.20E+00
STANDARD 1
IN DEVIAtlllN
(MG/DNM3)
i . isE-oa
1 .7 IE +00
«.?t.F*00
8.16E+00
1 . 3 7 fc + P 1
2.22F+01
3.5IE+01
3.23E+00
6.7BE-P1
2.25F+OI
1 .?2f +01
6.80F+PO
5.976*00
5.66F+00
6.68E+00
5.43E+00
3.75F+OU
2.0VE+00
9.02E+00
1.S8E+01
2.03E+P1
2.23E+P1
2.05E+01
7.60F.-01
8.00E+00
4.59E+PO
3.95E+00
5.02E+00
5.46E+00
6.09E+00
5.46E+00
4.7bE+00
4.0IE+00
3.26E+00
2.59F+00
1 .99F +00
1 . 32E+UO
JPPEW CUNF IDENCE
Ll^ir
(wr, /UNM3)
1 .55F»01
^.05E + t)l
^.79E +01
3.79E+01
S.I 3E+01
7.1bE+OI
o.e<»E + (M
1 . 1 76 + "2
8.476+01
5.05E+01
2. 7 OF. + 01
.276+01
.I8E+01
.21E+01
".53E+00
.03E+H1
.096+01
.29E+OI
2.08E+01
3.SOE+OI
a. 136 + 01
1.366+01
0.03F. + 01
1.716+01
2.306+U1
1 ,b5E«01
1 .27E + 01
l.OOE+01
fl. J3E + 00
1 .ObF + OI
9.026+00
7.58E+PO
h.34E+00
S. 176 + 00
0.226+00
3.38E+00
1 .836 + OU
< CONFintNCb
L IMIT
3.01E+OI
S.0«t+01
6.b3t+oi
a. lat + uo
3.156 + 00
5.13t+00
1 .096 + 01
1.626+01
2.196+01
2.236+01
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SUE DISTRIBUTION
RHO= t.OO GM/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER RECORDS fiXCLUOtO FROM MEAN
CH»NGF IN MASS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
IS
19
to 20
1 21
I-- 22
to 23
vo jq
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
2.50E-OI
2.9SE-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-0!
4.83E-01
5.69E-01
6.7IE-01
7.91E-01
9.32E-01
I.10E»00
1.29£«00
I.53E»00
1.80E+00
2.12E«00
2.50E»00
2.95E*00
3.47E«00
4.09E*00
4.83E»OU
5.69E»00
6.7IE+00
7.91E*00
9.32E»00
1.10E*01
1.29E*01
1.53E»01
1.80E»01
2.12E»01
2.50E«01
2.95E»01
3.47E«01
«.09E»01
«.83E*01
5.69E»OJ
6.7IE«01
7.91E*01
9.32E*01
4
NONE
NONF.
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
2
2
NONE
NONE
NONE
f)
6
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
4
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE
RHO* 1.00 GM/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER
PARTICLE SIZE OISTR1HUTION
MEAN CHANGE
IN NUMPEH CDNCENTHAIION
(NII/DNM3)
•P
1
H
•U
0
1
2
3
•
5
b
7
8
9
10
11
li
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
2.50E-01
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.83E-01
5.69E-01
6.7IE-01
7.91E-01
9.32E-01
1.10E»00
1.29E»00
1.53E*00
I.80E+00
2.12E+00
2.SOE+00
2.95£*00
3.47E»00
4.09E+00
4.83E»00
5.69E*00
6.71E+00
T.91E»00
9.32E»00
I.10E+OI
1.21E*01
1.53E»01
1.80E»01
2.12E«01
2.50E»01
2.95E»01
3.47E*01
4.09E+01
4.83E»01
5.69E*01
6.71E»Ol
7.91E*OI
9.32E»01
J.18E+1?
9.U7E»U
7.60E*1I
5.20E»11
5.73E*10
1 .86E + 10
5.10E»09
2.50E»09
1 ,63E»09
7.75E*08
5.76E*08
3.3tE»08
?.OOE»08
1.27E*08
7.20E»07
2.39E*U7
1 .69E*07
7.71E*Ob
3.54E«U6
7.UOE»05
4.62E»OS
1.18E»05
5.99E»Ofl
STANDANU
UEVIATI UN
(NO/ONM3)
I .bOE«09
I .07F*10
J.b^E»09
I .9bE*09
8.17E«08
O.Obt+08
1.71E*08
1.53E«08
1.29E*08
8.61E»07
4.fl3E»07
1 ,(»9E*06
1.01F*06
1.32F»05
b.8oE»04
2.H3E»03
7.6HF»U3
3.1IE»03
UPPER CDNFIDFNCE
LIMIT
(NO/UNM3)
I.27E«12
1 .ObE*
H . 7 1 F »
a.5IF.»
?.OOE«
7.28F.»
?.37E«
3.87E»09
l.lbE»09
7.70E»08
a.98E»06
3.58E+OH
3.63E»08
I.68E+OW
9.50E»07
2.47F. *07
2.02E«07
8.88E»Ob
4.1 1E*05
2.b7E»0«
1 ,31F»Oa
a.38F+Oj
LHWFH CHfjF JiltNCK
LIMIT
1 ,41E»lr»
I.WMK* ?
a.iat*
«.33^+
1.9BE*
3.3»>t:
1.1 2t
B.29b*0«
3.03t»OH
2.75E*l)H
8.62E*07
4.6Vt»07
1.35E»07
l.05E*Ob
3.81E»OS
b,15E»U3
3.bHt«OJ
-------
A3ARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SUE D 1 ST H IHUT ION
RHO= 1.00 GM/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER RECORDS EXCLUDED FROM MEAN
CHANGE IN NIIMHEH CONC fcNT H A T I (IN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
2.50E-01
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
«.83E-01
5.69E-01
6.7IE-01
7.9IE-01
9.32E-01
I.IOE'OO
1.29E+00
1.53E»00
1.80E»OU
2.12E»00
2.50E»00
2.9SE+00
3.47E»00
4.09E»00
«.83E»00
S.69E»00
&.7tE«00
7.91E»00
9.32E»00
1.IOE+OI
1.29E»01
1.53E»01
1.80E»01
2. 12E»01
2.50E«OI
2.95E»01
3.47E»Ol
«.09E»01
4.83E*01
5.69E»01
fc.71E»01
7.9IE*01
9.32E»01
4
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
?
2
NONE
NONE
NONE
6
6
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
4
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
a
NONE
-------
END OF PROGRAM
JEOJ
CPU sec. s 6?. ELAPSED WIN. = «». FHI, M*K it, I«»JM.
NJ
-------
IjOB RPT,P3«909.PET,STACK
PRIORITY * E3| INPRI = 8: TIME = UNLIMITED SECONDS
JOB NUMBER s «JZ«
TUf, FE8 ii, 1983. 10:39 AM
MP3000 / MPE IV C.OO.B4
•FILE FTN10*CIDR01DA,OLO
IRUN STKTSTPG.STACK
OJ
-------
FIELD DATA
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TVPF
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP. (PEG. F)
BAP. PRESS. (IN. MG)
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H?0)
FILTER NUMPER(S)
STACK INSIDE DIM. (TNI
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
METER CALIB. FACTOR
READ a RECORD O*TA EVERY
ASARCO TACOMA
NO 4 ser FX
PART 3I7E-CHG
on
55.
29.55
«**•«
MARK MI
60.00 .00
.80
.000 CFM a .0 IN.HG
1.001
5.0 MINUTtS
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER VELOCITY ORIFICE PRESSURE
POINT TIME TTMF
NO. (MIN.) (24-HR
n nrif )
C l*'l* ** f
> INIT 0 1256
' 5.0 0
£ 8.8 1245
*». 10.0 12^0
15.0 0
15.6 1259
16.1 1302
19.4 1309
20. • 1315
21.1 13*9
22.0 13«2
24.9 1347
24.9 1617
30.0 0
31.7 1*23
32.5 815
36.9 8«1
39.0 845
READING HEAD DIFFERENTIAL
(CU.
145
140
150
151
154
155
155
15T
158
154
159
161
161
164
165
165
168
169
FT.) (IN.H20) (IN.M?0)
OFSIHFO ACTUAL
.035
.350
.760
.589
.800
.158
.367
.512
.101
.537
.153
.035
.875
.420
.477,
.918
.722
.974
.150
.200
.100
.200
.150
.100
.100
.too
.000
.000
.000
.850
.800
.100
.150
.800
.150
.10
.30
.10
.30
.10
.30
.30
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.30
.30
.10
.10
.30
.30
.30
.30
.10
.30
.30
.30
.30
.10
.10
.30
.10
DATE
RUN NUMBER
PROBE LFNGTH ft TYPE
NOZZLE
: I.D.
ASSUMED MOISTURE
SAMPLE BOX
METER BOX
METER HEAU
NIJMHEP
NUMBER
OIFF.
PROBE HEATFR SETTING
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
86.
82.
85.
90.
86.
84.
92.
99.
85.
88.
103.
7".
79.
84.
86.
68.
73.
HEATFR nox
DRY GAS METER
TFMP
(DFG.F)
INLFT OUTLFT
65. 63.
66. 63.
66. 63.
67. 63.
6«. 64.
66. 63.
69. 65.
69. 65.
66. 63.
69. 66.
69. 66.
68. 66.
68. 66.
67. 65.
65. 61.
57. 55.
59. 56.
SETTING
PUMP
VACUUM
(IN.HG)
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.6
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.8
01/18/83
PSMC-I
6* STEEL
.111
1.0
FB7
1.71
0.
0.
IMPACTOR IMPINGER
TEMP TEMP
(DEC.
86
82
85
90
86
84
92
99
85
88
103
79
79
84
86
68
73
F) (DEC.
53
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
54
54
55
55
56
56
56
56
57
F)
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
TOTALS
AVERAGE
39.0
24.939
1.30
1.10
85,
66.
63.
2.5
85.
55.
PERCENT ISOKTNFTTC
104.1
-------
PL«NT * CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
PAR.PRF3S.dM. H6)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HC)
NOZZLEH.D.UN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING a 6.6169F.-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STA6E
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
M6/OSCM/3TAGE
•SARCO TACOMA
NO a SEC EX
01/18/83
PSMC-1
no
85.2F 29.fee
29.53
28. 7Z
.131
1.300
SI
1
8.84
28.80
in CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 75.15
7
8
1
67
7.1903E-02 GR/03CF
32 S3
2 ^
,80 5.03
,80 6.50
,25F»01 «
.56 61.95
TMPACTOR FLOWRATE(ACFM)
AT IMPACTQB CONDITIONS
TMPACTDR TEMP. 85. 2F
PARTICLE OFNJ»ITY(GM/CC)
MAX. PARTICLE DIAM.MICHOS
PAS COMPnsITION(PERCFNT) : C02
CO
N2
02
H20
SAMPLING Ol'H»TTON(MJN.)
CF 1.5I02E*02 MG/ACM
34 35 36 37
0567
3.21 1.74 .83 .58
3.50 5.30 13.00 19.40
.693
29. 6C
1.00
100.0
.00
.00
99.00
.00
1.00
39.00
1.
38
8
.31
17.60
6454E»02 M6/OSCM
FILTER
9
12.60
CUM. (MS/ACM) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (N6/OSCM) SMALLER TM«N 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
8EO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMFT*R3)
DM/OLOGD (MG/DSCM)
ON/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLE1/n3CM)
1.14E*02 1
1.«OF»01 2.7aF»01 2.49E»01
a?. 80 26.06 10.87
6.«8F»01 3.95E*01 1.65E*01
7.0flF»01 4.?9E»01 1.79E*01
I.78E*OI
4.97E-02 4
5.40E-02 4
?.97F»01 8
3.87E*01 ?
?.81?+06 7
0.95F»00 1
58.93 50.36
02E«02 9.38E»01 8.92F*01 *
11F*02 1.02E+02 9.70F»01 f
07F-02 0.10E-02 3.90E-02 3.60E-02 2.83F-02 I.72E-02 7.19E-OS
86E-02 4.05E-02 0.20E-02 3.91E-02 3.08E-02 1.87E-02 7.82E-03
30F*00 6,?6F»00 0.02F.»00 ?.3fcF*00 1.20f»00 6.95F-01 fl.?5F-01 Z.I9E-OI
29E»02 fl.«aF+01 2.5aF»01 2.82E»01 5.91F»01 t.77E»02 «».12F»01 5.92E»OI
7.47F»08 4.07F+09 6.09F»10 1.01E*12 2.28^*12
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE ?0 D^GC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC OIAMETFRS ARF CAICOLATF.D HFMF ACCOROINR TO THE TASK RROUP ON L»NP, DYNAMICS.
-------
T»COM»
NO a 9F.c EX
PLANT « CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBFR
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
STACK PRESS.(IN. Hfi)
N07ZLEII.D.(TN.)
METER HEAD OtFF.
CALC. MAS9 LOADINR • 6.M69F-02 GR/ACF
TMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
D50 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/OSCM/STAGE
PSMC-1
no
«5.2F
29.53
28.72
.131
1.300
TMPACTnH Fl OWRMF (*CFM)
AT 1MP«CTOB CUNDIlTflNb
TMPACTOR TFMP.
PARTTCI.f DFNSITV (G*/tC)
MAX.P»RTTCLE DtAM.MICROS
r.AS
. ?F
29. 6C
CO?
CO
N?
02
H20
SAMPLING DURATTON(MIN.)
91
1
8.92
28.80
7.1903C-02 GP./f>SCF
92 S3 SO
? 1 4
,88 5.12 3.30
,80 6.50 3.50
1.00
100.0
.00
.00
99.00
.00
1.00
39.00
I .*454E*02 MG/PSCM
98 FILTER
8 9
.39
17.60 12.60
cn
CUM. PERCENT OF M«9S SMALLER TM»N 050 75.15
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (M6/OSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
6EO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETFR*)
DM/OL060 (MG/OSCM)
ON/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLE9/DSCM)
l.5io?E«o2 MG/ACM
S5 S6 97
567
7.88 5.12 3.30 1.82 .91 .66
8.80 6.50 3.50 5.30 13.40 19.40
4.07E»01 1.25E»01 9.20E*00 4.95E*00 7.50E*00 1.90E*01 2.74E»01 2.49E+01
67.56 61.95 58.93 54.36 42.80 26.06 10.87
1.14E+02 1.02E+02 9.38E*01 8.92F»01 8.23E^01 6.48E«01 3.95E«01 I.65E+01
1.24E«>02 1.I1F»02 1.02E«02 9.70E*01 8.94E+01 7.01E»01 4.29E»OI 1.79E*01
4.97E-02 4.47E-02 4.10E-02 3.90E-02 3.60E-02 2.B3E-02 1.72E-02 7.19E-03
5.40E-02 4.86E-02 4.45E-02 4.24E-02 3.91E-02 3.08E-02 1.87E-02 7.D2E-03
2.99E*01 8.39E*00 6.35F.»00 4.11E*00 2.45E»00 1.29E»00 7.77E-01 5.09E-01 2.77E-01
3.88E«01 2.31E+02 4.90E»01 2.59F+01 2.91E»01 6.31E»01 1.97E«02 I.09E»02 5.92E*01
2.78E»06 7.q8E+Oe 3.66E + 08 7.15F.+08 3.78E»09 5.62E«10 8.02E»11 1.58EM2 5.34E»12
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO MERCER.
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD DAT* TABULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
A9ARCO TACOMA DO
TEST PSMC-I
NO « SEC EX
I
**
ENGLISH UNITS
TEST
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
P1TOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
01/18/83
1236
845
39
1
1
.0
.001
.131 IN
.84
.30 IN-H20
METRIC UNITS
01
1236
845
39.
1.
3.
•
33.
/IB/83
0
001
3
84
0
MM
MM-l
DROP
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRV GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BMO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MD MOLECULAR MT-ORY STACK GAS
NWS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IP GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
AS STACK AREA
24.939 CU-FT
64.6 F
24.876 SCF
.251 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
29.53 IN-HG
-11.00 IN-H20
28.72 IN-HG
85. F
27.03 ACF
2827. SO-IN
.706 CU-M
18.1 C
.704 SCM
.007 SCM
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
750.06 MM-HG
•279.40 MM-HIO
729.52 MM-HG
30. C
.77 ACM
1.824 SQ-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES
PD PARTICLE DENSITY
• 68 OEG F, 29.9Z IN.HG.
M
.(*
00
104.1
1.789 Gk
.06 GR/CI
100.t
I 15.900 MG
1.00 GM/CC
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
A3ARCO TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/18/83
TEST TEAM LEADER
DO
NUN NO
PSMC-I
SAMPLE LOCATION
NU « SEC IX
CALC. MASS LOADING
M
*k
VO
TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES UIVIDED BY A VOLUME. UNITS GIVEN ANE GRAINS PEK
ACTUAL* CUBIC FOOT(GH/ACF),GRAINS PEN U»Y STANDARD** CUBIC FOOT(GH/ObCF ) ,
MILLIGRAMS PER ACTUAL CUBIC MEUMMG/AC") AND MILLIGRAMS PEW OKY SUNOAHD
CUBIC MFTER(MG/OSCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(6R/ACM * MT(6H) / IF(ACF)
CML = 1.789 / 27.031 =
CML(GR/03CF) s MT(SR) / VMSTD(DSCF)
CML * 1.789 / 20.876 =
CML(M6/ACM) s MT(MG) / IF(ACM)
CML * 115.900 / .765 =
CML(M6/D3CM) • MT(MG) / VMSTD(DSCM)
CML = 115.900 / .700 =
RR/ACF
.0719 GH/DSCF
151.41A3 MG/ACM
164.S386 Mb/DSCM
050 (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PARTICLES ON EACH STAGE ASSUMING A 50 PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
M6/DSCM/STA6E
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
M6/D3CM/STAGEU) *
MG/OSCM/STAGE(1) *
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CUBIC METER FOR EACH STAGE(MG/DSCM/STAOt)
MASS(I) / VMSTD(DSCM)
28.80 / .700 e
00.75
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE CORRESPONDING DbO INDICATED
FOR THAT STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM S (6) = MASS(7) * MASS<8) » MASS(9)
MT (MG)
CUM X (6) • 19.00 * 17.60 *
115.90 (MG)
* 100 =
12.60
• 100 e 54.36
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PARTICLES SMALLER IN UIAMtTER
THAN THE CORRESPONDING ObO. MASS/VOLUMt UNITS »HE MR/AC",
MG/DSCM,GR/ACF,GK/I)SCF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(MGSACM) (5) « MASS(6) » MASS(7) + MASS(H) * MAS3(9)
IFtACM)
CUM.(M6/ACM) f5) = 13.40 * 19.«0 » 17.60 « Ji.bO
.77 (ACM)
82.31
I-1
Ui
O
GEO.MEAN OIA.(MICROMETERS)
THE GEOMETRIC MEAN DIAMETER IN MICROMETERS
FOR A PARTICULAR STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
CEO.MEAN DIA.(J) c 30RT( DSO(J) « D50(J-1))
GEO.MEAN OIA.(6) = SURT( .91 * i.
OM/OL06D(M6/DSCM)
DM 1$ MG/09CM/STAGE(J) AND OLOGO IS LOG 10(050(J-l) /
050(J)) WHERE J IS THE CORRESPONDING STAGE NUMBER.
FOR STAGE 1 THE MAXIMUM PARTICLE UIAMF.TEM IS USED.
FOR STAGE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) THE 050 IS ASSUMED AS
.S • 050 OF STAGE 6.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
OM/OL060U) = MG/DSCM/STAGEU)
LOGC OSO(J-l) / D50(J))
OM/DL06D (3) = 9.80
LOG( 7.66 / 5
49.01
ON/OLOGD THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES PER UNIT VOLUME FOR A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
ON/DLOGO(J) > OM/OLOGO(J)
5.23599E-10 * PDlGM/CC) * GEO.MEAN DIA.(J)
ON/OLOGO (3) = 49.01
5.235999E-10 • 1.00 •
. s
6.55
3b5M8240.00
• CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
•• CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
66 OEG.F AND 29.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
-------
FIELD DATA
PLANT ASANCU TACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NO a SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PART SIZE-CHG
OPERATOR DU
AMBIENT TEMP.(OEG.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN. HG) 29.80
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) »»•••
FILTER NUMRER(S) MARK HI
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
P1TOT TUBE COEFF. .64
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM 9
METER CALIB. FACTOR 1.001
READ A RECORD DATA EVERY 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE
POINT
NO.
TIME
(MIN.)
CLOCK GAS METER
TIME
(24-HR
f 1 f\f M %
READING
(CU.FT.)
VELOCITY
HEAD
(1N.H20)
0 IN.HG
DATE 01/19/63
WIIH NUMBER P3MC-2
PRUflE LENGTH ft TYPE b' STEEL
NI1Z7LE : t.U. .131
ASSUMED MOISTURE I .0
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
MF.TEH BOX NUMBtH FH7
ME IF.H HEAD OIFF . | . M
PWUBE HEATER SETTING 0.
HEATER BOX SETTING 0.
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENT
UN.H20)
IAL
STACK
TEMP
(OEG.F)
DESIHED ACTUAL
INIT
>
1
1— '
Ul
I— i
TOTALS
AVERAGE
0
5.0
8.7
9.5
10.6
16.0
18.3
19.0
22.3
22.3
PERCENT
936
0
944
1129
1135
0
1236
1317
1322
ISOKINETIC
170.131
173.400
175.814
176.263
176.915
180.420
181.873
162.256
184.365
14.234
.500
.500
.300
.900
.400
.300
.300
.200
101.8
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
1.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
1.30
76.
77.
77.
76.
77.
75.
77.
no.
77.
PHY GAS
TEMP
(»ER.
METER
F)
PUMP
VACUUM
(IN.HG)
IMPACTOR IMPINGEH
TEMP
(DEG.F)
TfcMP
(DEG.F)
INLET UUTLET
60.
62.
63.
63.
63.
65.
63.
hb.
63.
58.
59.
61.
61.
61.
61.
61.
63.
61.
2.3
2.3
«?.?
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
76.
77.
77.
76.
77.
75.
77.
60.
77.
42.
42.
42.
43.
43.
43.
44.
44.
43.
-------
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. H6)
NOZZLESl.D.dN.)
METER HEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING « 3.8713E-02 6R/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
090 (MICROMETERS) ' 0
ASARCO TACOMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/19/83
PSMC-2
DO
76.9F 24.9C
29.80
28.99
.131
1.300
IMPACTOH FLUWPATE(ACFM)
AI IMPACTOH CONDITIONS
IMPALIUR ItMP.
PAHT1CLE DENSITY(GM/CC)
MAX.PAkTICLE f)IAM. MICROS
GAS coMpusirioN(PEWtENt):
SAMPLING f)UHATIQN(MIN.)
I MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
M
J^MG/OSCM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 74
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/PSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/OLOGO (MG/OSCM)
DN/OLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DSCM)
SI
I
,85
,60
,35E*01
,93
,64E*01
,04E*01
.90E-02
.08E-02
,97E*01
,23E»OI
62E+06
4.1036E-02 GK/OSCF
S2 S3 Sa
i 3 H
7.80 5.00 3.22
3.20 1.60 1.30
.885
76.9F 2a.9C
1 .00
1UO.O
CU2 .00
CO .00
N2 99.00
02 .00
H20 1.00
22.30
9.3905E«01 MG/DSCM
ss FILTER
8 9
.31
7.20 7.30
8.fl589E«01 MG/ACM
35 S6 37
567
1.74 .83 .58
1.30 2.50 4.30
7.82E«00 3.91E»00 3.lHt»00 3.1«E*00 b.ltt+00 1.05E»01 1.76E«01 1.78E»01
66.58 62.40 59.01 55.61 89.09 37.86 19.06
5.90E*01 5.53E*01 5.23E*Ol 4.93E«01 4.35E*01 3.35E»Ol 1.69E»01
6.25E«01 S.fl6E»01 5.54E«01 5.22E«01 4.61E«01 3.56E+01 1.79£*01
2.58E-02 2.42E»02 2.28E-0? 2.15E-0? 1.90E-02 1.47t-02 7.38E-03
2.73E-02 2.56E-02 2.42E-02 2.28E-02 2.01E-02 1.55E-02 7.82E-03
8.31E*00 6.27E»00 4.03t»00 2.37E»00 1.21E+00 b.VBE-01 4.27E-01 2.21E-01
l.fl«E*02 2.06E+OI 1.63t*01 1.I9E+OI 1.91E«01 6./9E*01 6.48E«OI 5.93E*01
4.78E+08 1.59E»08 4.77E«08 1.72E*09 2.08t»10 3.82E+11 1.59E*12 1.05E«13
STANDARD CONOITIONS ARE 20 OEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS.
-------
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. MS)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLESI.D.UN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
TACOHA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/19/83
PSMC-2
00
76.9F 24.9C
29.80
28.99
.131
1.300
IMPACTUW FLUKRATE(ACFM)
AI IMPACTUK CONDITIONS
IMPACTUW TEMP.
PARMCLf DENSITY(GM/CC)
MAX.PAkTICLE D1AM.MICROS
GAS COMPOSITION(PERCtNT):
CALC. MASS LOADING • 3.87I3E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE 31
STAGE INDEX NUMBER 1
090 (MICROMETERS) 8.93
>
I MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 9.60
"J MG/DSCM/STAGE 2.35E«Ol
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN D50 74.93
SAMPLING OURATIONCMIN.)
4.1036E-02 GR/OSCF
32 S3 SO
234
7.89 5.12 3.30
3.20 l.bO 1.30
.685
76.9F 24.9C
1.00
100.0
Cl)2 .00
CO .00
N? 99.00
02 .00
H20 1.00
22.30
9.3905E»01 MG/OSCM
38 FILTER
8 9
.39
7.20 7.30
CUM. (M6/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (6R/DSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
OEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DL060 (MG/DSCM)
DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM)
6.64E«01
7.04E*01
2.90E-02
3.08E-02
2.99E*01
2.20E»01
1.60E»06
8.05R9E«01 MG/ACM
S5 36 . 37
5 6 7
1.82 .91 .66
1.30 2.50 4.30
7.«2E+00 3.9IE+00 3.1«E»UO 3.18E»00 fc.Ilt»00 1.05E*01 1.7bE*01 t.78E«01
66.58 62.40 59.01 55.61 49.09 37.86 19.06
5.90E»01 5.53E»01 5.23E»01 4.93E»01 4.35E»OI 3.35E*01 1.69E»01
6.25E + 01 5.86E»01 5.54E + OI b.22E»01 4.6U«01 3.56E*01 1.79E*01
2.5HE-02 2.42E-02 2.28E-02 2.15E-02 I.90E-02 1.47E-02 7.38E-03
2.73E-02 2.56E-02 2.42b-02 2.28E-02 2.01E-02 1.5SE-02 7.82E-03
8.39E»00 6.35E*00 fl.llt»00 2.45E«00 1.29t»00 7.781-01 5.10E-01 2.77E-01
1.45E«02 2.08E»Oi l.bht»01 1.23E»0« 2.03E«01 7.b5E»Ol 7.70E*01 5.93E»OI
4.69E»08 1.55E»08 4.5BE«08 1.60E»09 1.61E»10 3.06E+1! 1.11E»12 5.33E«12
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 OEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TP MERCER.
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD DATA TABULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
A8ARCO TACOHA DU
TEST PSMC-2
NO « SEC EX
TEST DATE
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
|VM
M
Oi
*\M
VMSTD
TIME-START
TIME -FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
DROP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
ENGL
ISH UNITS
01/19/83
936
1322
22
1
1
14
61
14
.3
.001
.131 IN
.84
.30 IN-H2U
.234 CU-FT
.9 F
.404 SCF
METRIC UNITS
01/19/83
936
1322
22
1
3
33
16
.3
.001
.3
.84
.0
.403
.6
.408
MM
MM-He!0
CU-M
C
SCM
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMO MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MO MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MMS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
AS STACK AREA
.145 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
29.8(1 IN-HG
-11.00 IN-H20
28.99 IN-HG
77. F
15.27 ACF
2827. SO-IN
.004 SCM
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
756.92 MM-HU
•279.40 MM-H^O
736.38 MM-HG
25. C
.43 ACM
1.824 SO-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES
PO PARTICLE DENSITY
* 68 DEC f, 39.98 IN.HG.
I
M
cn
lUt.8
.591 GR
.06 GR/CI
101 .R
38.300 MG
1.00 GM/CC
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCO TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/19/83
TEST TEAM LEADER
DO
RUN NO
PSMC-«!
SAMPLE LUCATION
NO 4 SEC EX
CALC. MASS LOADING
I
M
Ul
TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES DIVIDED BY A VOLHMK. UNITS GIVEN ARE GRAINS PER
ACTUAL* CUBIC FOOT(GR/ACF).GRAINS PF R UHY STANDARD** CUBIC FOOT(GR/DSCf),
MILLIGRAMS PtR ACTUAL CUBIC METER(MG/ACM) AND MILLIGRAMS PER DRY SIANOARU
CUBIC METER(MG/DSCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(GRXACF) • MT(GR) / IF(ACF)
CML » .591 / 15.268 =
CML(6R/DSCF) • MT(GR) / VMSTD(DSCF)
CML * .591 / 14.404 e
CML(MG/ACM) • MT(MG) / IF(ACM)
CML * 38.300 / .43Z =
CML(MG/OSCM) 3 MT(MG) / VMSTD(DSCM)
CML 2 38.300 / .408 =
.0387 GR/ACF
.0410 GH/DSCF
88.5890 MG/ACM
93.9U4B Mti/DSCM
050 (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PARTICLES ON EACH STAGE ASSUMING A 50 PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
Mt/DSCM/STACE
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CUBIC METER FUR EACH STAGE(MG/OSCM/STAGE)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/DSCM/STAGE(1) s MASS(l) / VMSTD(DSCM)
MG/08CM/STAGE(I)
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
9.60 /
.408
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE CORRESPONDING 050 INDICATED
FOR THAT STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM I (6) = MASS(7) » MASS(B) » MASS(9)
MT (MG)
CUM X (6) « 4.30 * T.ao » 7.30
38.30 (MG)
• 100 =
* 100 s 55.61
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PARTICLES SMALLER IN DIAMETER
THAN THE CORRESPONDING 050. MOSS/VOLUME UNITS ARE MG/ACM,
MG/DSCM,GR/ACF,GK/USCF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(M6/ACM) (5) s MASS(6) « MASS(7) » MASS(8) * MAS3(9)
IF(ACM)
CUM.(MS/ACM) (5) a 2.50 » a.30 » 7.20 «
• ••••»•••**•••••••••••••«••••••••*••••••<
.43 (ACM)
7.30
09.27
CEO.MEAN OIA.(MICROMETERS)
THE GEOMETRIC MEAN DIAMETER IN MICROMETE*S
FOR A PARTICULAR STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
GEO.MEAN OIA.(J) 9 SQRT( D50(J) * DSO(J-l))
6EO.MEAN OIA.(6) z SORT( .91 * 1.82)
1.29
I
H
Ul
DM/DL06D(M6/D3CM)
DM IS M6/03CM/STAGE(J) AND OLUGD 13 L0610(050(J-l)
050(J» WHERE J IS THE CURRESPONOING STAGE NUMUEH.
FOR STAGE 1 THE MAXIMUM PARTICLE PIAMF.1RR IS USED.
FOR STAGE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) THE 050 IS ASSUMED AS
.5 • 050 OF STAGE 8.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
OM/OLOGD(J) = M6/03CM/STAGEU)
LOG( D50U-1) / 050(J))
OM/OLOGD (3) * 3.91
LOG( 7.89 /
-- r
5.12 )
20.80
ON/OL06D THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES PER UNIT VOLUME FOR A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
ON/OLOGO(J) • DM/OLOGOU)
5.23599E-10 • PD(GMXCC) * GEO.MEAN OIA.(J)
ON/OL06D (3) • 20.64
5.235999E-10 • 1.00 •
• s
b.35
155073312.00
• CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
•• CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
68 DE6.F AND 29.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
-------
FIELD DATA
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP.(OES.F)
BAR. PRESS. (IN. H6)
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20)
FILTER NUMBER(S)
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN)
PITOT TUBE COEFF.
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE
METER CALIB. FACTOR
READ ft RECORD DATA EVERY
ASARCO TACOMA
NO 4 SEC EX
PART SIZE-CHG
DO
55.
30.00
•9.00
MARK III
60.00 .00
.64
.000 CFM a .0 IN.HG
1.001
5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER VELOCITY ORIFICE PRESSURE
POINT
NO.
INIT
>
1
l_i
01
00
TOTALS
AVERAGE
TIME TIME
(MIN.) (84-HR
Pi fif" H 1
LLUI»n |
0 620
5.0 0
10.0 0
15.0 0
20.0 0
25.0 0
27. 9 846
26.5 656
29.1 912
29.7 920
30.3 946
31.3 950
S2.« 950
34.9 1000
36.6 1004
36.5 1114
40.6 1121
40.8
PERCENT I30KINETIC
READING HEAD DIFFERENTIAL
(CU.
164
187
190
193
196
199
201
201
201
202
202
203
203
205
206
207
208
24
FT.) (IN.H20) (1N.H20)
DESIRED ACTUAL
.435
.490
.480
.490
.500
.520
.229
.552
.852
.221
.506
.085
.722
.196
.363
.346
.707
.050
.000
.050
.900
.000
.050
.000
.000
.950
.950
.650
.900
.000
.900
.000
.850
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.14
.272
1.14 1.14
99.7
OATF.
KIIN NUMBER
HKOBE LENGTH A TYPE
NIJ/ZLE
: I. H.
ASSUMED MOISTURE
SAMPLE BUX
METEH BOX
ME TEH HE At)
NUMBER
NUMHEH
DIFF .
PROBE HEATER SETTING
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
80.
96.
64.
84.
84.
85.
82.
83.
85.
83.
85.
94.
76.
73.
73.
73.
83.
HEATER BOX
DKY GAS METEH
TEMP
(UEG.F)
INLET OUTLET
57. 55.
5B. 55.
60. 55.
63. 56.
65. 56.
68. 57.
62. 58.
62. 56.
62. 58.
f>3. 6V.
63. 60.
63. 60.
63. 60.
63. 60.
62. 60.
62. f-0.
62. 58.
SETTING
PUMP
VACUUM
(IN.HG)
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
01/20/83
PSMC-3
6* STEEL
.131
1.0
FB7
1.71
0.
0.
IMPACTOR IMP1NGER
TEMP TEMP
(DEG.
80
96
«4
84
84
85
62
83
65
83
65
94
76
73
73
73
63
F) (OEG.F)
42.
42.
42.
42.
43.
43.
44.
45.
45.
42.
42.
42.
42.
42.
42.
42.
43.
-------
(Ji
VO
1C
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEII.O.UN.)
METER HEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING « 4.0451E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
DSQ (MICROMETERS) 9.16
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 13.00
M6/DSCM/STA6E 1.84E+01
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 81.10
A9ARCO TACOMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/20/83
PSMC-3
00
82.5F 28,
30.00
29.34
.131
1.140
IMPACTUH FLOKUATt(ACFM)
AT IMPAClOfc CONDITIONS
IMPAttOH TEMP.
PARTICLE DtNSITY
-------
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEtl.O.dN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING » 4.0451E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STA6E
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS) 9,
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 13,
O MG/DSCM/STA6E 1,
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 81,
ASARCO TACUMA
NO 4 SEC EX
oi/20/83
PSMC-3
00
82. 5F ?8
30.00
29.34
.131
1.140
IMPACTUH FLMWPAlt
AT IMPACION CONDITIONS
IMPACTOH TtMM.
PARTICLE nEMSlTY(GM/CC)
MAX.PAMriCLE 01AM.MICROS
GAS COMPOSITIONfPEKCENl ) :
1C
SAMPLING DUHAT1UN(MIN.)
en
CUM. (MB/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (M6/DSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/DSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
CEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DL06D (M6/DSCM)
DN/DL060 (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM)
7
7
3
3
3.
1.
1.
SI
1
24
00
84E»01
10
51E«01
95E»01
28E-02
47E-02
046*01
78E*01
4.2815E-02 GK/DSCF
32 S3 84
234
8.17 5.30 3.42
5.30 3.20 2.00
7.52E*00 4.54E*00 <
73.40 68.75 65.84
9.?5b5F*01 MG/ACM
55
5
1.89
2.10
2.9BE*00
62.79 48.69
86
6
.95
9.70
.643
»2.5F 28.1C
1.00
100.0
C02 .00
CO .00
N? 99.00
02 .00
H20 1.00
40.80
9.7976E*01 M6/DSCM
87 88 FILTER
789
.69 .41
10.80 10.50 12.20
1.53E»01 1.49E+OI 1.73E+01
32.99 17.73
6.79E»01 6.36E«01 6.09E+U1 5.81E«01 4.5IE«01 3.05E*01 1.64E+01
7.19E*01 6.74E+01 6.fl5E»01 6.15E*01 a.77E»OI 3.23E«01 1.74E*Ot
2.97E-02 2.78E-02 2.66E-02 2.54E-02 1.97E-02 1.33E-02 7.17E-03
3.14E-02 2.94E-02 2.82E-02 2.69E-U2 2.08E-02 1.41E-02 7.59E-03
8.69E*00 6.58E»00 4.25E+00 2.5QE*00 1.30t*00 fl.Ofct-01 5.28E-01 2.87E-01
1.40E+0? 2.42E*01 1.49t«OI l.lbE+OI 4.58E>01 1.10E»02 6.54E»01 5.75E*01
4.06E408 1.62E*OA 3.69E*08 1.35E*09 3.67E*10 4.02E»11 8.47EMI <
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 OE6C AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO MEP.CEH.
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD DATA TABULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
ASARCO TACOMA OU
TEST PSMC-3
MO « SEC EX
ENGLISH UNITS
TEST
TB
TF
TT
V
ON
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
01/20/83
820
1121
40
1
1
.8
.001
.131 IN
.84
.14 IN-H20
METRIC UNITS
01/20/83
820
1121
40
1
3
29
.8
.001
.3
.84
.0
MM
MM-I
DROP
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTO VOLUME OP DRV GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MD MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MNS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES* ABS.
T8 AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
24.272 CU-FT
60.1 f
24.799 SCF
.250 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
30.00 IN-hG
-9.00 IN-H2U
29.34 IN-HG
63. F
26.25 ACF
.687 CU-M
15.6 C
.702 SCM
.007 SCM
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
762.00 MM-HU
•228.60 MM-H20
745.19 MM-HG
28. C
.74 ACM
AS
STACK AREA
2827. SO-IN
1.824 SO-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
NT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES
PO PARTICLE DENSITY
* 68 OE6 F,
IN.HG.
I-1
01
99.T
1.062 GH
.06 GH/C1
hH.800 MG
1.00 liM/CC
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
M
CO
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCO TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/20/83
CALC. MASS LOADING
TEST TEAM LEADER
DU
HUN NO
PSMC-3
SAMPLE LOCATION
NO H SEC EX
TOTAL MASS OF PART1CLES DIVIDED BY A VOLUME. UNITS GIVEN AHE GRAINS PEN
ACTUAL* CUBIC FOOT (GW/ACF),GHAINS PEN DRY STANDARD*• CUHIC FOOT(GR/DSCF),
MILLIGRAMS PER ACTUAL CUBIC METER(MG/ACM) AND MILLIKHAMS PER DRY STANDARD
CUBIC METER(MG/nSCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(GR/ACF) • MT(6H) / IF(ACF)
CML » 1.068 / 26.248 =
CML(GR/D3CF) * MT(6R) / VMSTD(DSCF)
CML * 1.063 / 24.799 3
CML(M6/ACM) « MT(MG) / IF(ACM)
CML « 66.800 / .743 =
CML(M6/03CM) c MT(MG) / VMSTD(OSCM)
CML 9 68.600 / .702 *
.0409 GR/ACF
GH/DSCF
92.56SU MG/ACM
97.9757 MG/USCM
050 (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PARTICLES ON EACH STAGE ASSUMING A SO PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MC/OSCN/3TA6E
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/DSCM/3TAGEU) =
M6/DSCM/STAGEU) *
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CURIC METER FOR EACH STAGE(MG/OSCM/STAGE)
MASS(l) / VMSTOIDSCM)
13.00 / .702 e
IB
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE CORRESPONDING 1)50 INDICATED
FOR THAT STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM X (6) * MASS(7) » MAS3(8) * MASS(9)
MT (MG)
CUM X (6) s 10.80 * 10.SO » 12.20
68.80 (MG)
• 1UO =
100
62.79
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME) THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING UF PARTICLES SMALLER IN DIAMETER
THAN THE CORRESPONDING 0*50. MASS/VULUME UNITS ARE MR/AC"*,
MG/D3CM,GR/ACF,GH/DSCF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(MG/ACM) (5) = MASS(6) «• MASS(7) » MASS(B) » MASS(9)
IFIACM)
CUM.(MGXACM) (5) c 9.70 » JO.80 » 10.50 » 12.20
. - 5b.i2
,7
-------
FttLU DATA
PLANT ASARCU TACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PART SIZE-CHG
OPERATOR 00
AMBIENT TEMP. (OEG.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN. HG) 30.00
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) -9.00
FILTER NUMBER(S) MARK III
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM a
METER CALIB. FACTOR 1.001
READ ft RECORD DATA EVERY 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
> INIT
I
f-1
Ul
SAMPLE
TIME
(MIN.)
0
11.2
12.9
15.3
15.8
20.0
23.0
23.7
CLOCK
TIME
(24-HR
1450
1501
1556
1611
1616
0
1816
1838
GAS METER
READING
(CU.FT.)
208.77!
215.588
216.572
216.010
216.271
220.900
222.692
223.036
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN.H20)
3.800
3.800
3.900
3.600
3.700
3.700
3.600
0 IN.HG
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(IN.H?U)
DESIRED ACTUAL
.14 .14
.14 .14
.14 .10
.14 .14
.14 .14
.14 .14
.14 .14
DATE 01/20/63
RUN NUMBER PSMt-4
PROBE LENGTH * TYPE 6* STEEL
NUZZLE : I.U. .131
ASSUMED MOISTURE i.u
SAMPLE RUX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER FB7
MFTER HF.AD DIFF . 1.71
PROBE HEATER SETTING 0.
HEATER BUX SETTING 0.
STACK
TEMP
(OEG.F)
DKY GAS METER
TEMP
(OEG.F
PUMP
VACUUM
(IN.HIi)
IMPACTUR IMPINGER
TEMP
(DEb.F)
TEMP
(OEG.F)
INLET OUTLET
83.
81.
73.
60.
64.
82.
61.
62.
65.
65.
65.
6b.
66.
65.
60.
63.
63.
63.
64.
64.
63.
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.1
83.
81.
73.
80.
84.
82.
81.
• 8.
48.
50.
51.
51.
53.
54.
TOTALS
AVERAGE
23.7
14.267
1.14
1.14
61
bb.
63.
2.1
at
51.
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
102.3
-------
a\
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLESI.D.UN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING « 5.4798E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
DSO (MICROMETERS) 9
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 12
MG/DSCM/STAGE 3
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 76
ASARCO TACUMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/20/83
PSMC-4
DO
80.6F 27.OC
30.00
29.34
.131
1.140
IMPACfUH FLUWHATE(ACFM)
Al IMPAC1UH CONDITIONS
IMHACTUR TtMP.
PAKTICLE OEN3Iir(GM/CC)
MAX.PHHTICLE D1AM.MICROS
GAS CHMPUS1tION(PEHCENT)!
SAMPLING OURATION(MIN.)
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (MG/OSCM) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (GR/DSCF) SMALLER THAN DSO
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/OLOCD (M6/DSCM)
DN/OL060 (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM)
SI
1
,15
,70
,09E*01
,57
,60E»01
,01E*02
.20E-02
5.7794E-Oa GR/DSCF
32 S3 84
234
8.07 5.21 3.33
b.OO 11.40 4.40
.bag
BO.bF 27.OC
1.00
100.0
C02 .00
CO .00
N2 «*9.00
U2 .00
H20 1.00
23.70
1.3225E»02 MG/OSCM
SS FILTER
8 9
.33
4.50 4.40
,97E*01
,05E»06
1.2540E+02 MG/ACM
S5 S6 87
b 6 7
1.80 .87 .61
3.80 3.00 4.00
l.flfcE+01 2.77E+01 1.07E+01 9.24E+00 7.30t»00 9.73E»00 1.09E»01 1.07E«01
65.50 44.46 36.35 <>9.34 23.80 16.42 8.12
8.21E+01 5.58E*U1 1.56E+OI 3.b8E*01 2.98E«01 2.06E»OI l.U2E«01
6.66t+01 5.8BE+01 4.»lt*01 3.8PE+01 3.156*01 2.17E*01 1.07E»01
3.59E-02 2.44E-02 1.99E-02 1.61E-02 1.30E-0? 9.00E-03 4.45E-03
3.791-02 2.57E-02 2.10E-02 1.7UE-02 1.38E-02 9.49E-03 «.69E-03
A.59E+UU 6.aflE»00 4.1bt*00 2.45E>00 1.25E*00 7.25E-01 4.46E-01 2.31E-01
2.68E«02 1.46E>02 5.50E*Ol 3.48E»Ol 2.28E*Ol 6.32E*Ol «.07E*01 3.SSE«01
6.08E»Od 1.02E+09 1.45E«U9 4.51E«09 2.24E+10 3.17E»11 8.80E«11 5.49E*12
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 OE6C AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP UN LUNG DYNAMICS.
-------
27.OC
PLANT a CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEU.D.dN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING * 5.4798E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STASE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
039 (MICROMETERS) 9,23
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 12.70
MC/DSCM/STA6E 3.09E«OI
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 76.57
ASARCO TACOMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/20/63
PSMC-4
00
80. 6F
30.00
29.34
.131
1.140
IMPACTdH FLOfcHATt(ACFM)
AT JMPAC10H CONDITIONS
1MPACTUH TtMP.
PARTICLE DtNSITY(GM/CC)
MAX.PAkTKLE (HAM.MICROS
GAS COMPUSITION(PEHCENT):
SI
1
SAMPLING DUWATIUN(MIN.)
5.7794E-02 6R/DSCF
32 S3 SO
2 3 4
8,15 5.29 3. S7
567
1.69 .94 .69
3.80 3.00 4.00
1.46E+OI 2.77E+01 1.07t+OI 9.24E«00 7.30E+00 9.73E»00 J.09E»Ol 1.07E«01
65.50 44.46 36.35 29.34 23.60 16.42 8.12
8.21E*01 5.56t*01 4.56E»Ol 3.68E*01 2.98t*OI 2.066*01 1.02E»01
8.66E+01 5.66Et01 4.81E+01 3.88E«01 J.15E»Ol UO 1.33E»00 8.04E-01 5.27E-01 2.87E-01
2.71E+02 1.48E*02 5.60t»01 3.59E+01 2.43E»01 6.99E»01 4.60E»Ol 3.55E>01
7.92E*08 9.96E*08 1.40f.*09 4.21E»09 1.95E»|0 2.57E»ll 6.26E«1I 2.86E»12
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 OEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO MLRCER.
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD DATA TABULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
ASARCO TACOMA DO
TEST PSMC-4
NO 4 SEC EX
TEST DATE
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
ENGLISH UNITS
01/20/83
1450
1838
23.7
1.001
.131 IN
.84
1.14 1N-H2U
MtTRIC UNITS
01/20/83
1450
1838
?3.7
1.001
3.3
.84
29.0
MM
MM-
00
DROP
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VM8TD VOLUME OP DRV GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMO MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MD MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MN8 MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
14.267 CU-FT
63.9 F
14.473 SCF
.146 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
30.00 IN-HG
-9.00 IN-H2U
29.34 IN-HG
81. F
15.26 ACF
.404 CU-M
17.7 C
.410 SCM
.004 SCM
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
762.00 MM-Hli
•228.60 MM-H20
745.19 MM-HG
27. C
.43 ACM
A8
STACK AREA
2827. SO-1N
1.024 SU-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC 102.3
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES .B36 GK 54.200 HG
PO PARTICLE DENSITY .Oh GH/CI 1.00 (iM/CC
• 66 DE6 F, 29.92 TN.HG.
vo
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULAIIUNS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCO TACOMA
TE3T DATE 01/20/83
CALC. MASS LOADING
TEST TEAM LtAOER
DO
RUN NO
P3MC-1
SAMPLE LOCATION
NO 54.200 / .432 =
CML(MGXOSCM) c MT(MG) / VMSTD(OSCM)
CML = 54.200 / .410 =
.0546 GR/ACF
,0578 GH/OSCF
125.3957 MG/ACM
132.2530 MG/DSCM
050 (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PARTICLES UN EACH STAGt ASSUMING A 50 PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEMNIHON
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
M6/OSCM/3TA6E
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/OSCM/STAGE(1) s
MG/03CM/3TA6EU) s
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CUHIC MITER FOR EACH STAGL(MG/OSCM/STAGE)
MASS(I) / VMSTD(DSCM)
12.70 /
.410 a
30.88
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLbO SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE CURHF.SPONU ING D5U INDICATED
FOR THAT 3TAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM I (6) s MASSC7) * MASSC8) * MAS3(9)
MT (MG)
CUM X (6) • 4.00 » 4.50 * 4.40
SO.20 (MG)
• 100 s
• 100 s £9.34
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PARTICLES SMALLER IN UIAMETtR
THAN THE CORRESPONDING 050. MASS/VOLUME UNITS A»t *G/ACM,
MG/DSCM,GR/ACF , (.H/DSCF .
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(M6/ACM) (5) a MASS(6) * MASS(7) » MASS(8) » MASS(9)
IF(ACM)
CUM.(M6/ACM) (5) s 3.00 » 4.00 » 4.50 * 4.40
.43 (ACM)
36.79
6EO.MEAN DIA.(MICROMETERS)
THE GEOMETRIC MEAN DIAMETER IN MICROMETERS
FOR A PARTICULAR STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
GEO.MEAN DIA.(J) « SORH O5o(j) • osou-n)
GEO.MEAN oiA.(b) r SORU .94 * i.H9)
1.33
7 DM/OL060(MG/DSCM)
M
~J
DM IS MG/DSCM/STAGEU) AND DLOGU IS LOG 10 (050 (J-l ) /
D50(J)) WHERE J IS THE CORRESPONDING STAGE NUMBER.
FOR STAGE 1 THE MAXIMUM PARTICLE OlAMMF.R IS USED.
FOR STAGE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) THE 050 IS ASSUMED AS
.5 • 050 OF STAGE 8.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
OM/DLOGO(J) = MG/DSCM/STAGEU)
LOG( D50U-1) / OSO(J))
OM/DL060 (3) a 27.73
LOG( 8.15 /
• - s
5.29 )
lflT.7«
DN/OL06D THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES PER UNIT VOLUME FOR A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
ON/OL06D(J) a DM/DLOGDU)
5.23599E-10 * PD(GM/CC) * GEO.MEAN OIA.(J)
DN/OL060 (3) » 11T.74
5.235999E-10 • I.00 •
• «
b.57
996138624.00
* CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
•• CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
66 OEG.F AND 29.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
-------
HtLU DATA
H-
ISJ
PLANT ASARCO TACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PART SIZE-CHG
OPERATOR 00
AMBIENT TEMP.(OEG.F) 50.
BAR. PRESS. (IN. MS) 29.70
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) -9.00
FILTER NUMBER o) MARK m
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM a .0 IN.HG
METER CALI8. FACTOR 1.001
READ » RECORD DATA EVERY 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER VELOCITY ORIFICE PRESSURE
POINT TIME TIME READING HEAD DIFFERENTIAL
NO. (MIN.) (24-HR
-------
5?
PLANT » CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEH.0.(IN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING > 6.56I4E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE 31
STAGE INDEX NUMBER I
050 (MICROMETERS) 9.30
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 20.40
M6/DSCM/STAGE 5.18E*01
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 66.78
ASARCO TACOMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/82/85
PSMC-5
DP
66. 9F 20.5C
29.70
29.04
.131
I.140
IMPACTUR FLUWHATE(ACFM)
AT IMfACrOK LUNOIU'INS
IMPACTIJP
PAHTICLE DbNSt TT(GM/CC)
MAX.PAHTKLE niAM. MICROS
GAS cnMPUSITION(PEHCENT) !
SAMPLING OUHAT10N(MIN.)
6.8410E-02 GH/USCF 1
32
2
8.20
5.40
S3
3
5.30
4.20
S4
4
3,3"
2.40
35
5
1.14
3.80
.615
66.9F 20.5C
1.00
1UO.O
C02 .00
CO .00
N2 99.00
02 .00
H20 1.00
23.50
MG/ACM 1.5655E«02 MG/OSCM
56 37 S8 FILTER
6789
.88 .62 .34
8.90 7.20 4.60 4.50
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/OSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (6R/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/OLOGD (M6/DSCM)
DN/OL06D (NO. PARTICLES/DSCM)
I.OOE*02
1.05E+02
4.38E-02
4.57E-02
3.05E+01
5.02E»01
3.39E»06
I.37E+01 1.07E*OI 6.10E+00 9.66E+00 2.26t»OI 1.83E*01 1.17E»Ol 1.14E+01
57.98 51.14 47.23 41.04 26.55 14.82 7.33
8.71E*01 7.68E*01 7.09E»01 6.|6E*01 3.99E*01 2.23E»01 I.10E+01
9.08E»01 8.01E»01 7.39E*U1 6.42E«01 4.16t«01 2.32E»Ot 1.15E»01
3.80E-02 3.36E-02 3.10E-02 2.69E-02 1.74E-02 9.72E-03 4.8IE>03
3.97E-02 3.50E-02 3.23E-02 2.8IE-02 I.82E-02 I.OIE-02 5.0IE-03
8.73E*00 6.59E»00 4.23E«UO 2.a9fc+00 1.27E+00 7.39E-01 4.5fcE-01 2.37E-01
5.62E+01 3.13E»OI 3.64E«01 7.10t*01 1.19E»02 4.38E»01 I
7.24E*08 3.T5E+08 7.89E»08 4.48E«09 6.S8t*10 5.65E»11 ».85E»11 5.45E*12
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS.
-------
PLANT t CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEII.D.dN.)
METER HEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING « 6.5614E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050' (MICROMETERS)
(MILLIGRAMS)
ASARCO TACUMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/22/83
PSMC-5
DO
68.9F 20.5C
29.70
29.0«
.131
1.140
IMHACTUH FLOMRATb(ACFM)
AT IMPACtOk CONDITIONS
IMPAC1UH TtMM.
PARTICLE UtNSITY(GM/CC)
MAX.PAKtICLE OIAM.MICROS
GAS COMPdSlTIONlPEHCENT):
SAMPLING DUHATION(MIN.)
SI
1
9.38
20.40
k
MG/03CM/3TA6E 5.I8E+01
CUM. PERCENT Of MASS SMALLER THAN D50 66.78
6.8410E-02 GR/DSCF
S2 S3 SO
2 3 a
8.20 5.38 3.0b
5.40 4.20 2.40
.615
6B.9F 20.5C
1.00
1UO.O
C02 .00
CO .00
N2 99.00
02 .00
H20 1.00
23.50
1.5655E«02 MG/DSCM
88 FILTER
» 9
.41
4.60 4.50
CUM. (M6/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (6R/OSCF) SMALLER THAN D50
6EO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DL06D (MG/DSCM)
DN/DLOBO (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM)
1.00E»02
1.05E«02
4.38E-02
4.57E-02
3.06E«01
5.04E*01
3.35C»06
1.S015E+02 MG/ACM
35 36 37
5 6 7
1.92 .96 .70
3.80 8.90 7.20
1.37E+U1 J.07E+OI 6.IOE«00 9.66E«00 2.26E>01 l.83E»01 1.17t«01 I.14E«01
57.98 51.14 47.23 41.04 26.55 14.62 7.33
8.71E«01 7.68E + 01 7.0<)E*01 6.16E»01 3.99E+01 2.23E + 01 1.10E*Ot
9.0BE + 01 8.01E*01 7.3<»t»U1 b.42E»OI 4.16E«01 2.32E»01 I.I5E»01
3.80E-02 3.36E-02 3.10E-02 2.69E-02 1.74t-02 9.72E-03 4.8U-V3
3.97E-02 3.50E-02 3.23E>02 2.81E-02 1.82E-02 1.01E-02 5.01E-03
e.eit+00 b.67E»00 4.32E«00 2.58OUO 1.36t»00 B.18t-0t 5.36E-01 2.92E-01
2.55E*02 5.69E>01 3.J9E*01 3.75E»01 7.53E»U1 I.32E+02 5.14E»01 3.80E»01
7.10E*08 3.66E»08 7.59t»08 4.19t»09 5.77E»10 «.60t»ll 6.37E*11 2.92EM2
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 OE6C AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HEHE ACCORDING TO MERCER.
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD DATA TABULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADER
A8ARCO TACOMA DO
TEST PSMC-5
NO a SEC EX
ENGLISH UNITS
TEST DATE
1
I-1
VI
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
DROP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
01/88/83
1047
8180
83
1
1
13
60
13
.5
.001
.131 IN
.84
.14 IN-H8U
.669 CU-FT
.0 F
.851 SCF
METHIC UNITS
01/88/03
1047
8180
83
1
3
89
15
.5
.001
.3
.84
.0
.388
.5
.398
MM
MM-H80
CU-M
C
SCM
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MD MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MNS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
P3I STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
.140 SCF
1.00
.990
86.73
88.68
89.70 IN-HG
-9.00 IN-H8U
89.04 IN-HR
69. F
14.44 ACF
.004 SCM
1.00
.990
88.73
88.68
754.38 MM-Hb
•888.60 MM-H80
737.57 MM-Hti
81. C
.41 ACM
AS
STACK AREA
8887.
Sfl-IN
1.884 SO-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLtS
PO PARTICLE DENSITY
* 66 DE6 f, 89.
IN.HG.
I
\->
-J
GR
.06 GR/CI
61.100 MG
1.00 GM/CC
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCIILA1 IUNS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCO TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/22/83
TEST TEAM LEAKER
OU
RUN NU
PSMC-5
SAMPLE LOCATION
NO 4 SFC tX
CALC. MASS LOADING
I
H
>J
-J
TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES DIVIDED BY A VOLUME. UNITS GIVEN AWE CHAINS PER
ACTUAL* CUBIC I-OUUGR/ACF ),CHAINS PEK DHY STANDARD** CUBIC FOOTUJR/OSCF),
MILLIGRAMS PER ACTUAL CUBIC METEH(MG/ACM> AND MILLIGRAMS PER OHT STANOAHU
CUBIC METER(MG/DSCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(GR/ACF) « MT(6R) / IF(ACF)
CML * .946 / 14.441 =
CML(GR/DSCF) • MT(GR) / VMSTU(DSCF)
CML * .948 / 13.051 =
CML(MG/ACM) a MT(MG) / IF (ACM)
CML s 61.400 / .409 =
CML(M6/09CM) « WTCHG; / VMSTC(03Cf*}
CML * 61.400 / .392 =
.0656 GR/ACF
.0684 GR/DSCF
150.1469 Mb/ACM
156.5454 MG/OSCM
DSO (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PAMTICLES ON EACH STAGE ASSUMING A 50 PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
M6/OSCM/STAGE
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
THE MASS LOADING FUR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CUBIC METER FOR EACH STAGE(MU/OSCM/STARE)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/DSCM/3TAGEU) s MASS(l) / VMSTD(t)SCM)
M6/DSCM/STAGE(1) = 20.40 /
392 =
51.83
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETEH THAN THF. CURHF. SPOND ING 050 INDICATED
FOR THAT STAGE
* 100
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM X (6) * MASS(7) » MASS(8) * MASS(9)
MT (MG)
CUM X (6) » T.20 » 4.60 * 4.50
61.40 (MG)
• 100 = 41.04
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PARTICLES SMALLER IN DIAMtTEH
THAN THE CORRESPONDING USD. MASS/VOLUME UNITS AHh MG/ACM,
MG/DSCM,GR/ACF,GH/USCF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(MG/ACM) (5) s MASS(b) * MAS3(7) « MASS(8) » MASS(9)
IF(ACM)
CUM.(MG/ACM) (5) = 6.90 » 7.
~4
CO
THE GEOMETRIC MEAN DIAMETER IN MICROMFTEHS
FOR A PARTICULAR STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
6EO.MEAN OIA.(J) • SQRT( 050(J) * D50U-1))
6EO.MEAN DIA.(b) « SORT ( .96 • 1.
1.36
OM/OL080(MG/DSCM)
DM IS MG/OSCM/STAGE(J) AND OLOGD IS LOG 10(050(J-I) /
D50U)) WHERE J IS THE CORRESPONDING STAGE NUMBER.
FOR STAGE 1 THE MAXIMUM PARTICLE DIAMETER IS USED.
FUR STAGE 9 (HACKUH FILTtH) THE USD IS ASSUMED AS
.S • 050 OF STAGE 8.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DM/DLOGOU) = MG/DSCM/STAGE (J)
LOGl DSO(J-I) / D50(J))
DM/DLOGD (3) s 10.67
LOGl 8.26 /
-• 3
5.38 )
56.8T
DN/DLOSD THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES PER UNIT VOLUME FOR A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DN/DLOGDU) * DM/DLUGDU)
5.23599E-10 • POIGM/CC) • GEU.MEAN DIA.(J)
DN/DL060 (3) s S6.87
5.835999E-10 • 1.00 * b.67
• CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
•* CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
66 OEG.F AND Z9.9Z INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
365581376.00
-------
END OF PROGRAM
IFILE FTN10 « CIDROtDArOLD
IFILE FTNll«CIOR020A,OLD
IRUN CIDR2PGfSTACKs20000
END OF PROGRAM
triLE FTNOe=CIDR03DA,OLO
IFILE FTN09=CIOROOOA,OLD
tRUN CIDR4PG
I
I-1
•J
VD
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
RHO» 1.00~6M/CC
MEAN CUMULATIVE UPPEH CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL DIAMETER MASS CUNCtNTKATI UN LIMIT
(MICRONS) (MG/ACM) (MG/ACM)
>
1
K-1
00
0
1
2
3
•
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
3T
36
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
46
49
SO
51
52
2.50E-01
2.7IE-01
2.95E-01
3.20E-OI
3.47E-01
3.77E-01
4.09E-01
4.45E-01
4.83E-01
5.24E-01
5.69E-01
6.16E-01
6.71E-01
7.26E-01
7.91E-01
8.S8E-01
9.32E-01
1.01E»00
1.IOE+00
1.19E+00
1.29E»00
1.41E+00
I.S3E+00
1.66E+00
1.80E+00
1.95E*00
2.12E+00
2.30E»00
2.50E+00
2.71E»00
2.95E»00
3.20E*00
3.47E«00
3.77E*00
4.09E»00
4.45E»00
4.83E+00
5.24E*00
5.69E»00
b.I6E*00
b.71E»00
7.28E»00
7.91E»00
8.58E*00
9.32E»00
I.OIE»01
1.10E«01
1 _ J OF ^01
1 * 29E ^ 0 1
1.41E«01
1.53E+01
l.b6E»01
6.48E*00
7.38E»00
8.flOE»00
9.5bE»00
1.39E»01
J.58E»01
1.78E»01
2.00E«01
2.
2.
3.
.50E+01
.7bE»01
,05E*01
3.39E»01
3.7bE»OI
4.09E»01
4.39E*01
0.b6E»01
4.89E»01
5.08E»01
5.39E»01
5.51E»01
5.bOE»01
5.b6E»OI
5.75E»01
5.95E»OI
.01E»01
,07E»Ol
.13E»OJ
.20E»OJ
,29E»0»
,39E*01
.53E»01
.72E*01
,93E*01
.|9E»OI
.08E»01
.40E+01
,73E»Ol
,OSE»OI
,3bE»01
.63E»01
.89E+01
,OIE»02
1.03E»02
I.OSE*02
b.b>E»00
7.57E»00
.I2E«OI
.bJE«Ol
.81E»01
2.0/E»01
2.32E«01
3.I3E»01
3.87E*01
4.2IE*OI
0.52E+01
4.79E*OI
5.03E+OI
5.aOK»01
5.54E*01
5.75E*OI
5.83E*01
S.97E*01
fc.OflE+01
b,10E»OI
.29E»01
.3bE*01
.44E«OI
.70E*01
.88E»01
10E»01
3bE»01
7.b5E»01
7.96E*01
B.b2E«01
8.9bE»01
9.29E»01
1 .01E«Oi>
1.04E«02
1.0bE+Oa
LOWEH CONFIDENCE
LIM| f
(Mli/ACM)
7.1»E»0«
8.1
,U5E»Ot
,19E»01
.72E*01
.93E»01
2.b9E»01
3!29E»«1
3.97E»01
a.52E*01
4.75E*01
4.94E»01
5.53E*OI
5.bOE»01
5.73t»01
5.79E»01
5.85E«01
5.91E+OI
5.98E*01
,13E*OI
.23E+01
.37E*01
7.U1E»01
7.28E«UI
7.87E»01
8.19E+U1
8.82E»01
9.87E+UI
l.01E»02
-------
S3
5«
55
56
57
56
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
i.eoE+oi
1.95E+01
2.12E»01
2.30E«01
2.50E»01
2.71E*01
2.95E«01
.47E«01
.77E«01
.09E«01
,69E*01
.71E»01
,2$E«OJ
.91E»01
.56E+01
,07E»0?
,06E»02
.20E«02
,18E*0?
.21E»02
.23F.«02
,23E»02
.2«E*02
.ObK»02
,07E»02
,08t+02
.I0t*08
.1IL+U2
laE*02
,17Et02
,17E»02
.18E«02
>
I
00
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
MHO* 1.00 6M/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER RECORDS EXCLUDED FHUM MtAN
CU*UlATIVt MASS CON(tNTW«TinN
1 i
2 i
3 i
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
> 20
1 21
I-1 22
00 ?«
to "
24
25
26
27 i
28 i
29 i
30 i
31 i
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
». 506-01
>. 716-01
». 956-01
.206-01
.476-01
.776-01
.096-01
.456-01
.836-01
.246-01
.696-01
.186-01
.716-01
.286-01
.916-01
.586-01
.326-01
.016+00
.106+00
. 1 96+00
.296+00
.416+00
.53E+00
.66E+00
.806+00
.956+00
!. 126+00
». 306+00
'.50E+00
».71E»00
>. 956+00
1.206+00
S. 476+00
.776+00
.096+00
.456+00
.836+00
.246+00
.696+00
.186+00
.71E+00
.28E+00
.916+00
.586+00
.326+00
.016+01
.IOE+01
.19E+01
.296+01
.416+01
.536+01
.66E+01
.eoE+ui
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
?
2
2
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
-------
54
SS
96
57
56
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
I.95E+01 NONE
2.12E+OI NONE
2.30E»01 NONE
2.SOE+01 NONE
2.71E«OI a
2.95E*OI K
3.aOE»01
3.47E«01
3.77E*01
4.09E*01
«.45E»01
0.83E*OI
5.24E«01
5.69E»01
6.I8E+OI
6.7IE«01
7.28C*01
7.9IE«OI 8
6.58E«OI 8
9.32E«01 NONE
00
U>
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
MHO* 1.00 6M/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER
(MICRUNS)
1 2.50E-01
2 2.71E-01
3 2.95E-01
m
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2t)
1 2I
M 22
oo 23
*• 24
25
26
.20E-01
.47E-01
.77E-01
.09E-01
.4SE-OI
.83E-01
.24E-01
.69E-01
.I8E-01
.71E-01
.28E-01
.91E-01
.58E-01
.32E-01
.01E»00
.10E+00
.19E«00
,29E»00
,41E*00
.53E»00
.66E+00
.80E+00
,95E»00
27 2.1«»00
28 2.30E+00
29 2.50E+00
30 2.71E»00
31 2.95E»00
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
.20E+00
.47E»00
.77E»00
,09E»00
,45E»00
.83E*00
.24E*00
.69E»00
.18E»00
,7IE»00
,28E»00
,91E*00
.58E*00
.32E*00
.OlE^Ol
,10E-»01
.19E*01
.29E»01
.41E»01
.53E«01
.bbE*01
.80E+OJ
MEAN CUMULATIVE
MASS CONCENTKAT 1UN
(PERCENT)
5.33E*00
b.07E»00
*>.91E*00
7.8bE«OU
(I.93F + 00
,01F»01
.15E»01
,30E*OI
,flbE»01
.b4E»01
.85E»OJ
2.06E«01
2.27E»01
2.51E«01
2.79E*01
3.09E*01
3.36E»01
3.blE*01
3.83Et01
.02E+01
.18E»01
.32E401
,43E*0 1
.53E»01
,blE»01
,b7E*OI
.73E«01
.78E»01
.84E+01
.89E»01
.94E*01
,99E»01
.OflE»01
5.10E*01
5.17E»01
5.abE»01
5.37E*01
5.52E+01
5.70E*01
5.91E*01
b,14E*01
b.38E»01
b.b4E*01
b.91E*OI
7.I8E+01
7.44E«01
7.b9E»01
7.9?E»01
6.13E»01
8.32E»01
8.09E*01
8.bflE*01
B.78E+01
UPPER CONF IDENCE
LIMI 1
(PERCENT)
b.43E«UU
h.23E*00
7.12E»00
8.11E»00
9.23E»00
.ObE»01
. 19E«01
. 34E+OI
.5IE»01
.70E»01
.9JE»01
2.12E*OI
2.34E*01
2.57E»01
?.8/E*01
3.18E«01
3.4bE»01
3.72E«01
3.94E»01
4. 13E*0 I
«.30E»01
4.44E+01
4 ,55E»0 1
4.65E*01
4.73E*01
4.80E*OJ
4.8bE*01
4.91E«01
4.9bE+01
5.02E+01
5.07E*01
5.12E«01
5.17E»01
5.23E»01
5.3«E»01
5.39E»01
5.51E*01
5.bbE+01
5.84E*01
b.05E«0|
b.29E*Ol
h .54E + 01
b.8 1E*0 1
7.08E*Ol
7.37E»01
7.64E*01
7.89E*OJ
8.I2E+U1
8.33E»01
8.5iiE»01
A.7UE«01
8.85E»01
8.99E*01
LOWER CONFlOENCh
LIMI f
(PERCENT)
b.70F»UO
7.blE»00
8.b3t*00
I.25E«01
1 .41E + 01
1 .79t*OJ
2.UUE«OI
2.71E*01
3.00E«01
3.2bE*OI
3.'jOE»01
3.90E»01
u.2UL*01
4.40E«U1
4.bUE»UI
a.bbE+01
4.71E»01
4.7hE»01
4.8bE»01
a.91E»01
4.97E+01
5.I2E»01
5.24E»«1
5.39E»01
5.5bE*OI
5.7bE»01
b.73E»01
7.00E»Ol
7.2'iE*01
7.93t»01
8.29E»01
8.44E«01
-------
S«
55
56
57
56
59
60
61
62
63
64
6%
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
1.95E+01
2.12E*01
2.30E+01
2.SOE+01
2.71E+01
2.9SE«01
3.20E*01
3.47E*OI
3.77E*Ol
4.09E«01
4.45E»01
4.83E+01
S.24E«01
5.69E*01
6.ieE»OI
6.71E«01
r.2«E»OI
7.91E«01
e.58E»01
9.32E«01
B.90E+01
,01E*OI
.IIE*OI
,3hE»01
,5BE»OI
.70E»01
.75E»OI
.79E»01
.87E«01
.91E»01
.<»7F»01
.99E«01
1.00E«02
9.a9E*01
9.bbE»OI
9.7iE»01
9.80E»Ol
9.91E*01
,01E«02
fl.70E»OI
8.80E»Ol
8.90E«Ol
9.07E»01
9.30E»OI
9.37E*Ot
9.flJE»01
9.b9E»01
9.72t»01
9.75E*OI
9.78E»01
00
tn
-------
MHO* 1.00
INTERVAL
1
2
3
3
6
7
6
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
>20
'21
oo 2 2
24
23
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTH1BUT
6M/CC
MEAN CHANGE
DIAMETER
2.50E-01
2.93E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.83E-01
5.69E-OI
6.71E-01
7.9IE-01
9.32E-OI
1.10E+00
1.29E»00
I.eOE'OO
2.12E*00
2.30E*00
2.95E+00
,47E»00
.09E+00
.83E+00
.69E«00
.71E*00
,91E*00
.32E+00
.10E»OI
.53E»OJ
3.47E*01
4.09E*01
5.69E»OI
6.7IE+01
7.91E*01
9.32E*01
IN MASS CONCENTRATION
(MG/DNM3)
«.|OE*OJ
5.11E+01
8.06E+01
3.73E*01
2.57E*01
I.98E»01
I.79E»01
1.93E*OI
a.70E»01
4.81E+01
6.97E*01
8.57E»01
9.52E»Ol
9.77E+01
8.bOE*01
7.iaE»01
5.8bE»OI
fl.bbE»01
3.b7E»01
2.97E*01
2.51E»01
I.73E+01
1.19E»01
9.B1E»00
6.bOE*00
IONS
STANDARD
UEVIAT KIN
(MG/UNM3)
1.17t«01
1 ,7bE*01
2.IOE+01
a.9bE*01
1.3bE+Ol
3.b3E»01
,?5E»01
,lbE»01
.18E»01
3.52E«01
5.5IE»01
b.OVE«01
1.73E»01
2.32E401
I.99E*01
2.04E*01
l.S3E*01
1.IOE»OI
9.28E*00
7.64E>UO
b.aOE«OU
UHPEH CONFIOfcNCt
LIM1I
(MG/UNM3)
3.7«fE»01
4E»01
4.35E*01
3.bOE*01
3.5bE«OI
5.20E*00
2.09E»01
1.71E+01
1.43E«UI
1.18E»01
8.34E»00
LOHEH CONFIDENCE
LIMIT
(MG/ONM3)
3.5IE*(M
b.
9.b5E»01
7.97t»01
b.U7E*Ul
a.uot»oi
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
MMO* 1.00 6M/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER RECORDS EXCLUDED FROM MEAN
CHANGE IN MASS CUNTHAflUN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
> 20
1 2!
m "
™ 23
24
25
26
27
20
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
2.50E-OI
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.03E-01
S.69E-01
6.71E-OI
7.91E-01
9.32E-01
I.10E+00
1.29E»00
1.53E*00
1.00E+00
2.I2E«00
2.50E«00
2.95E«00
3.47E*00
4.09E«00
«.03E»00
5.69E»00
6S71E*00
7.91E«00
"».32E»00
1.10E«OI
t.29E«01
|(53E«0|
1.00E*01
2.12E^01
2.50E«01
2.95E»0|
3.47E*OI
4.09E«OI
*.83E»0|
5.69E*01
6.7IE«01
7.91E»01
9.32E«01
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
i
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE
«HO» 1.00 6M/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER
1 2.SOE-01
2 2.9SE-01
V
4
5
b
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
* 20
21
3 "
I 23
24
25
26
27
.47E-01
.09E-01
.83E-01
.69E-01
.71E-01
.91C-01
.32E-01
.10E+00
.29E»00
.53E»00
.BOE+00
.12E»00
,50E»00
.95E»00
,47E*00
.09E»00
.83E+00
,69E»00
.71E»00
.91E^OO
.32E«00
,10E»OJ
»29E*Ol
.53E»01
.80E»01
28 2.12Et01
29 2.50E+01
30 2.95E*01
31 3.47E«01
32 4.09E*01
33 4.83E»01
34 S.69E*01
35 6.71E+01
36 7.91E+01
37 9.32E+01
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
MEAN CHANGE
IN NUMBER CONCENTRATION
(NO/DNM3)
3.07E+12
?.41E«12
1.B7EM?
I.07E«12
8.10E«11
S.ltEttl
4.37E»U
2.22E+I1
.73E«10
.OOE»10
.42E*09
,97E*09
.31E»09
.33E*09
.81E»08
.50E*08
.22E«06
,«3E*08
.b8E+08
,31E*08
.15E*07
,53E»07
2.22E«06
l.l«E*Ob
5.73E»05
2.9flE*OS
1.47E»OS
7.52E»Oa
3.79E*04
l.S6E«04
STANDARD
DEVIATION
8.0flE»l1
5.83E*11
3.I»F»H
8.U9E«1U
1.03E»11
1.20E+10
5.33E»09
1.02E*09
8.P3E*OB
5.87F»OB
a.38E«08
4.IOE+08
3.bbE»08
8.13E+08
b.8JE»07
1.25E»07
4!o9E+Ob
1.14E«Ub
3.05E*Ob
I.S8E+OS
7.92E*04
4.05E»Oa
2.oaE+oa
UPPEK CONFIDENCE
LIHI1
INO/DNM3)
1 ,68E + ia
9.17E+1I
4.81E«09
l.b3E»09
1 ,OHt»09
8.05E»08
0.39E»08
1 .07E»08
3.5bE»07
l.7a£»07
8.71F+06
tt.40E*Ob
1 ,7«E«05
4.08E+OM
LOwEH CONFIDtNCE
LIMIT
(NO/DNM3)
I
7.0at»lI
a.79t»l1
3.73E»II
1 .8flE»l1
B.75E+10
3.87t*10
1 .bOt + 10
3.13E»09
1.80E+U9
b.O«E-»0«
b.85E»0«
b.01t«08
1 .83E»Ofl
1.0JE»0«
5.33E*07
2.73E»07
l.3tt»07
5.98t*06
4.55E»05
2.33E»05
1.17t*05
1 .97E+01
3.01t»«a
1.15E»0«
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
MHO* 1.00 GM/CC
INTERVAL DIAMETER RECORDS EXCLUDED FROM MEAN
CHANGE IN NUMBEH CONCENTRATION
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
2
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
-20
721
M22
0023
^24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
2.50E-OI
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.83E-01
5.69E-01
6.71E-01
7.91E-OJ
9.32E-OI
1.10E+00
1.29E+00
I.53E+00
1.80E+00
2.12E*00
2.50E»00
2.95E»00
3.«7E*00
fl.09E»00
4.83E*00
5,696*00
6.71E»00
7.91E»00
9.32E*00
1.10E»Ol
1 ,29E*01
1.53E*01
i.aoE*oi
2.12E*01
2.50E*OI
2.95E*OI
3.47E*01
4.09EtOt
«.93E*01
5.69E*01
6.71E»01
7.91E»01
9.32E*01
NONE
-------
END OF PROGRAM
tCOJ
CPU SEC. * 95. ELAPSED MIN. * 4. TUE» FEB ^^. 1963, 10:42 AM
vo
o
-------
FIELD DATA
PLANT ASARCO TACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NU 4 SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PART SIZE-BLOW
OPERATOR DO
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEC. F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN.HG) 29.53
STATIC PRESS. (IN. M20) -2.50
FILTER NUMBER (3) MAKK III
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
P1TOT TUBE COEFF. .84
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM 3
METER CALIB. FACTOR .980
READ S RECORD DATA EVERY 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER VELOCITY
POINT TIME
NO. (MIN.)
INIT 0
1.7
5.0
10.0
15.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
46.0
53.0
53.0
60.0
65.0
75.0
80.0
60.0
86.0
90.0
95.0
105.0
106.4
106.9
111.6
116.6
120.5
120.5
130.5
TIME
(24-MH
613
815
0
0
829
1515
0
0
1530
732
0
0
0
755
846
0
0
0
0
944
0
0
0
0
1011
1016
0
0
1030
1144
0
READING HEAD
(CU.FT.) (IN.H20)
281.310
262.135
263.750
286.230
268.717
333.534
336.070
338.580
341.070
356.472
358.920
361.390
364.290
367,663
380.410
383.900
386.360
391.310
393.781
405.438
408.600
410.590
413.090
418.100
418.760
420.008
422.650
425.160
427.108
432.220
437. 220
.500
.500
.450
.500
.500
.400
.400
.400
.500
.650
.650
.650
.650
.500
.650
.750
.700
.750
.500
.650
.700
.650
.700
.700
.650
.650
.600
.550
.500
.500
0 IN.HG
ORIFICE
PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(IN.
DES1HEO
.66
.68
.88
.68
.88
.88
.86
.88
.88
.88
.86
.66
.88
.66
.88
.88
.88
.86
.86
.88
.88
.68
.68
.68
.86
.88
.88
.86
.86
.86
H«?U)
ACTUAL
.86
.66
.80
.88
.88
.88
.68
.88
.68
.80
.68
.68
.86
.86
.88
.86
.68
.68
.80
.88
.88
.68
.88
.86
.86
.88
.80
.88
.88
.68
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
64.
64.
63.
62.
64.
69.
66.
68.
64.
55.
54.
54.
55.
64.
66.
63.
62.
62.
64.
66.
64.
62.
62.
61.
66.
66.
67.
66.
64.
67.
DATE 01/18/03
RUN NUMHEH PSB-1
HRUBE LENGTH ft TYPE 6* STEEL
NOZZLE : l.U. .148
ASSUMED MOISTURE 1.0
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
MEIEH BOX NUMBEH FB9
METEH HEAD OIFF. ?.o0
PROBE HEATER SETTING 0.
HFATEH HUX SETTING 0.
PRY GAS METEH PUMP IMPACTOR IMPINGER
TEMP
(DEC
INLtT
48.
49.
4V.
51.
60.
55.
55.
57.
60.
43.
44.
47.
49.
60.
54.
55.
57.
60.
60.
61.
61.
62.
63.
65.
64.
64.
64.
65.
60.
55.
.F)
00 I LET
54.
54.
54.
55.
61.
61.
61.
M.
61.
50.
50.
50.
50.
61.
57.
57.
57.
58.
61.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
64.
64.
64.
64.
61.
62.
VACUUM
( IN.HG)
.5
.S
. *>
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
TEMP
(OF.G.M
64.
64.
63.
62.
64.
69.
68.
68.
64.
5S.
54.
54.
55.
64.
66.
63.
62.
62.
64.
66.
64.
62.
62.
61.
66.
66.
67.
66.
64.
67.
TtMP
tUEd.F)
50.
50.
50.
49.
49.
50.
51.
51.
51.
51.
52.
52.
50.
50.
49.
49.
49.
49.
47.
47.
45.
45.
45.
45.
48.
48.
48.
48.
49.
49.
-------
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
A3AMCU TACOMA
NO a SEC EX
OAlt
HUN NUMHEM
U1/1B/H3
P3H-1
READ ft RECORD DATA EVERY 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK
POINT TIME TIME
NO. (MIN.) (24-HR
GAS MElEW VELOCITY
READING HEAD
(CD. FT.) (IN.H20)
ORIFICE PHESSUHE STACK
DIFFERENTIAL ItMP
UN.H?U) (OEG.F)
OUT GAS MtltP PDK.P IMPACTUH IMPINGEH
TEMP VACUUM TEMP TLMP
(DEr,.F) (1N.HG) (DEG.F) (UEti.F)
DESIRED
If
1
vr>
NJ
140.5
150^5
162.5
165.0
175.0
165.0
195.0
200.0
204.6
206.4
210.0
220.0
_. 230.0
240.0
245.0
TOTALS 245.0
AVERAGE
0
0
0
1226
0
0
_ 0
0
1316
1318
0
0
0
0
1401
442.200
447.160
453.150
454.347
459.260
464.300
469.330
471.600
474.300
475.087
476.950
461.970
487.010
492.060
494.590
.500
.500
.450
.500
.450
.400
.400
.400
.400
.400
.350
.400
.350
.400
.350
106.975
.66
.88
.68
.66
.88
.68
.66
.68
.88
.68
.68
.86
.88
.86
.68
.68
ACTUAL
.88
.88
.88
.88
.88
.68
.86
.68
.68
.86
.68
.66
.66
.68
.88
.68
INLET OUTLET
67.
66.
66.
65.
6V.
66.
67.
6V.
64.
68.
68.
68.
66.
65.
65.
64.
57.
61.
64.
67.
64.
65.
67.
67.
70.
70.
66.
68.
6V.
71.
71.
60.
61.
61.
62.
64.
65.
65.
66.
66.
67.
68.
68.
66.
69.
70.
70.
61.
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
67.
66.
66.
65.
69.
66.
67.
66.
64.
68.
68.
68.
66.
65.
65.
64.
49.
50.
50.
51.
51.
51.
51.
51.
51.
51.
51.
51.
51.
51.
52.
50.
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
89.1
-------
PLANT & CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEtl.D.dN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING « l.C
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/OSCM/STAGE 2.20E+01
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 13.21
ASAHCO TACOMA
NO 4 StC EX
01/18/83
PSH-1
00
64. 4F 18. OC
29.53
29.35
.148
.880
E-02 GR/ACF
SI
1
!o,es
67.00
1MPACTOH FLOHHATt (ACFM)
AT IMPACTOR CONDITIONS
IMPACTUH TEMP. b«.3F
PARTICLE
MAX .PACT
DENSI rY (GM/CC)
1CLE DIAM.MICHdS
GAS CDMPOSITIOMPF.HCENT ) J C02
SAMPLING
1.1120E-02 GR/OSCF
32 S3 SO
2 3 a
9,60 6,20 3.97
.30 .30 .70
CO
N2
02
H20
DURATION(MIN.)
?.4880E*oi MG/ACM
35 36 37
5 6 7
«?=!6 U«5 ,10
.60 1.20 2.20
1H.OC
1 .00
100.0
.00
.00
99 « OU
.00
1 .00
245.00
2.
38
8
.41
2.60
5446E+01 MG/OSCM
FILTER
9
2.30
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (M6/OSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (6R/ACF) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (6R/DSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DL06D (MG/OSCM)
ON/OL060 (NO. PARTICLES/DSCM)
3.29E»00
3.36E+00
I.44E-03
1.47E-03
3.30E*OJ
2.28E+01
9.85E-02 9.B5E-02 2.30t-0l 1.97E-01 3.94E-01 7.23L-01 8.54E-01 7.56E-01
12.82 12.44 11.53 10.75 9.20 6.35 2.98
3.I9E+00 3.09E»00 2.«7E»00 a.67E»00 2.29E*00 1.58t»00 7.41E-01
3.26E*00 3.I6E»00 2.93E*00 2.74E*00 2.34E*00 l.b?t»00 7.58E-01
1.39E-03 1.35E-03 1.25E-U3 1.17E-0? l.OOE-03 6.90E-04 3.20t-04
1.43E-03 1.38E-03 1.28(:-03 1.20E-03 1.02E-03 7.U6E-04 3.31E-04
1.02t»01 7.72E»00 4.9frE»00 2.93E*0(» 1.50E»00 8.80t-0l 5.51E-OI 2.90E-OI
1.81E«00 5.20E-01 1.19E+00 7.46E-01 1,25E*00 4.80E«00 3.33E»00 2.51E»00
3.25E*06 2.1»>E*06 1.85E*07 5.67E»07 7.03E«08 1.35E*10 3.8IE»10 1.97EM1
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THt TASK GROUP UN LUNG DYNAMICS.
-------
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEII.D.dN.)
METER HEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING • I.0872E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
059 (MICROMETERS)
ASAUCO TACOMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/18/63
P38-1
00
64.OF 18.UC
29.53
29.35
.146
.880
SI
I
10.96
IMPACTUH FLOWHATf(AC*M)
AT 1MPACIOK CONDITIONS
1MPACTUW TEMP.
PAHTICLK ntNSITYlGM/CC)
MAX.PAKT1CLF. DIAM.MICHOS
GAS COMPI)SITION(PtHCbNT) !
C02
CO
N2
02
H20
SAMPLING OURAT10N(M1N.)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 67.00
MG/DSCM/STAGE 3.206+01
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 13.21
1.1120E--02 GH/DSCF
32 S3 34
234
9.68 6.28 4.05
.30 .30 .TO
,a«7
18. OC
1 .00
100.0
.00
.00
99.00
.00
1.00
245.00
2.504bt»01 MG/DSCM
38 FILTER
8 9
.49
2.60 Z. JO
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (OR/AC?) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/03CF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGO (MG/DSCM)
DN/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DSCM)
3.29E*00
3.36£*00
1.44E-03
1.47E-03
3.31E+OI
2.«9E*01
1.21O06
2.48»OE*Ol MG/ACM
35 36 S7
567
2.24 1.12 . .82
.60 1.20 2.20
9.85E-02 9.85E-02 2.30k-01 1.97E-01 3.94E-01 7.23E-01 6.54E-01 7.56E-01
12.82 12.44 11.53 10.75 9.20 6.35 2.98
3.19E+00 3.09E»00 2.87E+00 2.67E+00 2.29b«00 1.5«E»00 7.41E-OI
3.26E + 00 J.16E»l>0 2.93k«UO 2.74b»uo 2.34t«00 t.62E*00 7.58L»Ul
1.39E-03 1.351-03 1.25E-03 I.17E-03 l.OOE-03 6.90E-04 3.24E-04
1.43E-03 I.38E-03 1.2HE-03 1.20t-03 1.02E-03 7.06E-04 3.31E-04
1.036*01 7.80E»00 5.04E+00 3.0lE»UO l.59t*00 9.57E-01 6.29F.-OI 3.43E»OI
1.83E»00 5.25E-01 1.20t»00 7.66E-01 1.32E*00 5.21E+00 3.7«E»00 2.51E«00
3.20E»Ob 2.1lE+Oh 1.7<>E+07 5.36E+07 b.31E»08 1.14t»10 2.91t»10 I.19E*|1
•STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 30 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HEfE ACCORDING TU MERCEh.
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD OAT* (ADULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LlAOtH
ASARCO TACOMA DO
TEST PS8-I
NO « SEC EX
ENGLISH UNITS
!
vo
ui
TEST DATE
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
VN
TM
VM9TO
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST,
METER CALIBRATION
MIN.
FACTOR
01
613
1401
245.
•
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
DROP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER
VOLUME OF DRV GAS
TEMP
SAMPLED
108.
60.
107.
/lfl/H3
0
980
148 IN
84
88 IN-H20
975 CU-FT
6 F
136 SCF
MtTRIt UNITS
01
613
1401
24b.
•
3.
•
22.
3.
15.
3.
/ 1 H / e 3
0
980
«
84
a
Oftfa
9
034
MM
HM-H20
CU-M
C
SCM
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VMC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BT VOLUME
FMD MULE FRACTION DRY GAS
MD MOLECULAR HT-ORY STACK GAS
MNS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
T3 AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
1.082 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
26.62
29.53 IN-HG
-2.50 IN-H20
29.35 IN-MG
64. F
109.58 ACF
.031 SCM
1.00
.990
26.73
28.62
750.06 MM-HG
•63.bO MM-H20
745.39 MM-HG
16. C
3.10 ACM
AS
STACK AREA
2827. SQ-IN
1.624 SO-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES
PO PARTICLE DENSITY
• 60 DEG F, 39.92 IN.HG.
89.1
1.191 GH
.Ob GK/CI
89.1
77.«iOU MG
1.00 GM/CC
vo
en
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCO TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/16/83
TEST TEAM LEADER
DO
HUN NU
PSH-I
SAMPLE LOCATION
NU « SEC tX
CALC. MASS LOADING
vo
-J
TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES DIVIDED HY A VULUME. UnITS GIVEN ARE GRAINS PEH
ACTUAL* CUBIC FOOT (Gfc/ACF ),CHAINS PEN DRY STANDARD" CUH1C FUOT (GR/DSCF ) ,
MILLIGRAMS PER ACTUAL CUBIC ME IER(MG/ACM) AND MILLIGRAMS PER DRY ST4NDARO
CUBIt METER(MG/DSCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(6R/ACF) « MT(GR) / IF(ACF)
CML » 1.191 / 109.?>T9 =
CML(GRXDSCF) * MT(GR) / VMSTD(DSCF)
CML * 1.191 / 107.136 *
CML(M6/ACM) * MT(M6) / IF(ACM)
CML s 77.300 / 3.103 =
CML1MS/OSCM) a MT(MG) / VMSTDCDSCM)
CML * 77.ZOO / 3.034 =
.0109 GR/ACF
.0111 GM/OSCF
MU/ACM
MG/DSCM
DSO (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PARTICLES ON EACH STAGE ASSUMING A SO PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
M6/D3CM/STA6E
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/DSCM/STAGE(1) s
MG/DSCM/STAGEU) c
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM X (6) = MA3S(7)
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PEK DRY STANDARD CUBIC METER FOR EACH STAGE(MR/DSCM/STAGE)
MASS(l) / VMSID(DSCM)
67.00 / 3.034 = 22.01
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE CORRESPONDING DbO INDICATED
FUR THAT STAGE
CUM X (6) •
MASS(6) » MASS(9)
MT (MG)
2.ZO 4 2.60 »
^^^^^^«ft^^^^^^^^^^«»^**«»^<
77.20 (MG)
* 100 =
2.30
100
10.75
-------
CUM. (MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING Of PARTICLES SMALLER IN UlAMtTER
THAN THE CORRESPONDING OSO. MASS/VULUMt UNI IS AWE M
MG/DSCM,GR/ACF,GK/USCF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(M6/ACM) (5) e MASS(6) * MASS(7) » MASS(8) * MASS(9)
IF(ACM)
CUM.(MG/ACM) (5) * 1.20 » 2.20 « 2.60 »
3.10 (ACM)
,..(,7
GEO.MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
THE GEOMETRIC MEAN DIAMETER IN MICHOHFTFHH
FOR A PARTICULAR StAliE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
GEO.MEAN OIA.(J) a SORT( D50(J) * OSO(J-l))
GEO.MEAN DlA.(b) = SORT( 1.12 • 2.
1.59
OM/OLOGO(M6/OSCM)
VO
°°
DM IS M6/DSCM/STA6E (J) AND DLOGD IS LOG10 (D5U ( J-l ) /
050(J)) WHERE J IS THE CORRESPONDING STAGE NUMBER.
FOR STAGE 1 THfc MAXIMUM PARTICLE DIAMETfcH IS USED.
FOR STAGE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) THE 050 IS ASSUMED AS
.5 * 050 OF STAGE 8.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DM/DLOGOU) * MG/OSCM/STA6E(J)
LOG( D50(J-1) / D50(J))
DM/OLOGD (3) > .10
......................... s
LOG( 9.68 / 6.28 )
.53
DN/OL06D THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES PER UNIT VOLUME FOR A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DN/DLOGDU) • OM/DLUGOU)
5.23599E-10 * PD(GM/CC) • GEO.MEAN OIA.(J)
DN/DL060 (3) * .53
..................... --- ..... — . --- :
5.235999E-10 * l.UO • 7. BO
• CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
•• CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
68 OEG.F AND 29.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
21la971.50
-------
FIELD n*tA
PLANT ASAHCU TACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PART SIZE BLOW
OPERATOR DU
AMBIENT TEMP. (DEC. F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN.HG) 30.00
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) -3. 00
FILTER NUMBER(S) MARK III
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM 3 .0 IN.HG
METER CALIB. FACTOR .960
READ S RECORD DATA EVERT 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METEM VELOCITY ORIFICE PHESSUHE STACK
POINT TIME TIME READING HEAD DIFFERENTIAL TEMP
NO. (MIN.) (24-HR (CU.FT.) (IN.H20) (1N.H2U) (DEG.F)
> INIT 0
M 5.0
«> 10. 0
« 15.0
20.0
25.0
25.0
29.7
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
Wl_l/t,» 1
1004
0
0
0
0
1029
1121
1126
0
0
0
0
1416
DESIRED
495.032
497.500
499.660
502.240
504.600
506.973
516.781
519.016
521.540
523.900
526.260
528.630
530.989
.350
.450
.400
.300
.500
.500
.400
.600
.500
.500
.500
.500
.82
.82
.8?
.82
.82
.8?
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
ACTUAL
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
DATE 01/20/83
HUN NUMBER P3H-2
PHUBE LENGTH ft TYPE 6' STEEL
NU12LE : 1.0. .148
ASSUMED M013TUKE 1.0
SAMPLF HO* NUMBEH
MEUH BOX NUMBEH FB9
MFJ1FH HF All OIFF. 2.06
PRUHE HEATkH SETTING 0.
HEATER HOX SETTING 0.
itHY GAS METER PUMP IMPACTUR IMPINGE*
TEMP VACUUM TEMP TEMP
IDEG.F) (IN.HG) (UEG.F) (DEG.F)
INLET UUTLET
63.
65.
63.
63.
61.
63.
66.
*><«.
63.
M.
62.
t>2.
47.
48.
50.
52.
55.
51.
55.
49.
4V.
51.
53.
56.
53.
53.
54.
54.
55.
55.
56.
55.
55.
55.
55.
56.
.5
.5
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
63.
65.
63.
63.
61.
63.
66.
64.
63.
63.
62.
62.
46.
• 6.
46.
47.
47.
46.
• 9.
49.
49.
50.
50.
50.
TOTALS
AVERAGE
55.0
26.149
.82
.82
63.
51,
55.
63.
48.
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
99.5
-------
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. H6)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEM.D.UN.)
METER HEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING s 4.6339E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
>STAOE INDEX NUMBER
0050 (MICROMETERS) 10
o
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 45
MG/D3CM/3TA6E b
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 42
ASARCU TACUMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/20/63
PSB-2
00
63.2F 17.3C
30.00
29.76
.MB
.820
1MPACTUP FLOWMATt(»CFM)
AT IMPArrUh CONDITIONS
IMPACTU" TEMP.
PAHT1CLE DtNSlTYtGM/tC)
MAX.HAHTICLE OIAM.MICKOS
GAS COMP()SITION(PEHCENT ) :
SAMPLING DURAT1I)N(MIN.)
4.6597E-02 GR/OSCF 1
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (M6/OSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (6R/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (6R/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
6EO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DL06D (M6/DSCM)
DN/OLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DSC*)
SI
1
,44
,70
,07E*OI
,86
,55E*01
,57E*01
.99E-02
,OOE-02
,23E»01
,19E»01
,50E»06
S2
.60
S3
3
5.96
.60
SO
4
3.BI
1.30
S5
5
2.07
2.60
S6
6
1.00
8.80
.461
63.
-------
>
o
17. 3C
PLANT ft CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLE! I.D.dN.)
METER HEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING « 4.6339E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE SI
STAGE INDEX NUMBER I
050 (MICROMETERS) 10,52
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 45.70
MG/OSCM/8TAGE b.07E+01
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN D50 42.88
ASARCU TACOMA
NO 0 StC EX
01/20/83
PSB-2
DO
63. 2F
30.00
29.78
.140
.820
IMPACTOR FLOWHA1E
AT 1MPACTOH CONDITIONS
1MPACTOH TEMP.
PARTICLE r>ENSHV(GM/CC)
MAX.HAKTICLE OIAM.MICROS
li»S COMPOSITION(PEHCENT)!
SAMPLING nU»AT10N(MlN.)
4.b597t-02 KR/OSCF
32 S3 SO
234
9,29 bsQ3 3,89
.bO .80 1.30
,atj4
fc3.i»F 17.3C
I .00
IUO.O
C02 .00
CO .00
N2 99.00
02 .00
H20 1.00
55.00
1.0bb3E*02 MG/DSCM
88 FILTER
8 9
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/OSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/DSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/OL06D (MG/DSCM)
ON/OL060 (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM)
4.55E»01
4.57t»Ul
1.99E-02
2.00E-02
3.24E*01
b.21E«01
3.47F.*Ob
1.0bOlE«02 MG/ACM
S5 Sb 37
5 b 7
2.15 1,08 .78 ,«7
2.60 8.80 9.70 7.50 3.00
7.97E-01 l.ObE*00 l.73E»00 3.45E+00 1.17E*Ol l.d9E*01 9.9bE«00 3.99E*00
42.13 41.13 39.50 3b.25 25.25 13.13 3.75
4.47E*OI 4.3bE*OI 4.19E+01 3.84E+OI 2.b8E*01 1.39E.+01 3.981*00
4.49E+U1 a.39t»01 a.21E»Ul 3.87E»«1 2.b9E«01 1.40E«01 O.OOE»00
1.95E-02 1.91E-02 1.B3E-02 l.bBE-02 1.17E-02 b.OBE-03 1.74E-03
l.9bt-02 1.92E-02 1.84E-02 1.69E-02 1.18E-02 6.12E-03 1.75E-03
9.89E»00 7.a
-------
IMPACTOR FIELD DATA TABULATION
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TEST TEAM LEADtH
ASARCO TACOMA DO
TEST PSB-3
NO 4 SEC EX
TEST
TB
TF
TT
Y
DN
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
ENGLISH UNITS
01/30/83
1004
1016
55.0
.960
.146 IN
.84
.83 IN-M3U
METHIC UNITS
ui/30/63
1004
1410
5b.O
.980
3.6
.84
20.8
MM
MM-i
O
ro TM
DROP
> VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
J. AT METER CONDITIONS
.AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTO VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MO MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MMS MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PSI STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
TS AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
36.149 CU-FT
53.1 F
36.495 SCF
.368 SCF
1.00
.990
38.73
38.63
30.00 IN-HG
-3.00 IN-H3U
39.76 IN-HG
63. F
36.64 ACF
.740 CU-M
11.7 C
.750 SCM
.008 SCM
1.00
.990
36.73
36.63
763.00 MM-HG
-76.30 MM-H20
756.40 MM-HG
17. C
.75 ACM
AS
STACK AREA
3637.
SO-IN
1.834 SO-M
-------
190 PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MT TOTAL MASS Of PARTICLES
PD PARTICLE DENSITY
• 68 DE6 F, 89.92 IN.HG.
10
O
U)
V9.5
l.?35 GN
.Ob GK/tl
9V.b
80.000 HG
I.00 GH/CC
-------
1MPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE: CALCULATIONS
PLANT-NAME AND CITT
ASARCO TACOMA
TEST DATE 01/20/83
TEST TEAM LEADER
no
HUN NU
SAMPLE LOCATION
NU 4 SEC tX
CALC. MASS LOADING
N>
O
TOTAL MASS OF PAKTICLES DIVIDED BY A VULUMfc. UNITS GIVEN ARE GRAINS PEN
ACTUAL* CUBIC FOUT(GR/ACF)rGRA INS PEW DWY STANUAHD** CUH1C FOOT (bH/OSCF ) .
MILLIGRAMS PER ACTUAL CUBIC METER(MG/ACM) ANU MILUIGHAMS Ptn HHY STANDARD
CUBIC MtTEH(MG/DSCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(6R/ACF) « MT(6R) / IF(ACF)
CML • 1
CML(6R/DSCF) s MT(GR) / VMSTD(DSCF)
CML « 1.235 /
CML(MGXACM) * MT(MG) / IF (ACM)
CML = 80.000 /
CML(MG/OSCM) s MT (MG) / VMSTD(DSCM)
CML * 80.000 /
2b.b42 = .Oab3 GR/ACF
RR/DSCF
,751 = 106.0496 MG/ACM
.750 = 106.6301 MG/DSCM
050 (MICROMETERS)
THE SIZE OF THE PARTICLES ON EACH STAGE ASSUMING A 50 PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
MG/DSCM/STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/03CM/STA6EU) «
MG/DSCM/STAGEM) =
CUM. PERCENT OF M«SS
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN AWE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CUBIC METER FUR EACH STAGE(MG/OSCM/STAGE)
MASS(l) / VMSTD(DSCM)
05.70 / .750 =
60.71
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE. CORHE SPUNU ING DbO INDICATED
FOR THAT STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM X (b) 2 MASS17) » MASS(8) » MASSO)
MT (MG)
CUM X (b) « 9.70 * 7.50 »
HO.00 (MG)
• 100 =
3.00
* 100 = 3b.25
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PAKlICLtS SMALLtK IN DIAMETER
THAN THE CURHESPUMOING DbO. MASS/VOl IIME UNlTij »HE MIJ/ACM,
MG/OSCM,GR/AtF,GH/USCF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(MG/ACM) (5) = MASS(fc) + MASS(7) * MASS(B) •» MA33 CO
IF(ACM)
CUM.(MG/ACM) (5) = 8.60 * V.7U » 7.50 *
.75 (ACM)
3.00
S8.10
GEO.MEAN OIA.(MICROMETERS)
THE GEOMETRIC MEAN D1AME1EK IN MICNOMF. TENS
FOH A PARTICULAR STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
GEO.MEAN OIA.(J) 3 SORTt ObO(J) • D^O(J-l))
GEO.MEAN OIA.(6) = SURK i.oe * ?.i5) =
KJ
O
cn
OM/OL060(MG/OSCM)
DM IS Mt/DSCM/STAGE(J) ANO OLUGO IS LOG 10(050(J-J) /
D50(J)) HHERE J IS THE CORRESPONDING STAGE NUMBER.
FOR STAGE I THE MAXIMUM PARTICLE UIAMfUK IS USED.
FOR STARE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) THE 050 IS ASSUMED AS
.5 • 050 OF STAGE 8.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
OM/OLOGOU) = MG/DSCM/STAGE(J)
LUG( D50(J-1) / D50(J))
OM/OLOGO (S) s 1.06
LOG( 9.^9 /
-- f
t-.OJ )
5.66
DN/DLOGO THE NUMBER OF PAhTlCLFS PER UNIT VOLUME FOR A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DNXDLOGO(J) • OM/OLUGD(J)
5.a3599E-10 * PD(GMXCC) • GEO.MEAN D1A.(J)
ON/DLOGD (3) = 5.66
5.235999E-10 • 1.00 * 7,«9
* CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
*• CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
60 DEG.F AND 29.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
2576908H.OO
-------
FIELD DATA
PLANT ASARCO TACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NU 4 SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PART SIZE-BLOW
OPERATOR DO
AMBIENT TEMP.(DEG.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN. HG) 30.00
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) -3.00
FILTER NUMBER(S) MARK III
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) 60.00 .00
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM 3
METER CALIB. FACTOR .980
READ « RECORD DATA EVERY 5.0 MINUTES
TRAVERSE SAMPLE CLOCK GAS METER VELOCITY
POINT
NO.
INIT
1
to
o
en
TOTALS
AVERAGE
TIME
(MIN.)
0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
60.1
70.1
BO.l
90.1
96.8
96.8
PERCENT
TIME
(24-HR
1616
0
0
0
1636
1734
0
0
0
1754
0
0
1836
0
0
0
2000
ISOKINETIC
READING HEAD
(CD. FT.) (IN.H20)
549.658
552.100
554.530
556.920
559.317
564.921
567.340
569.750
572.160
574.585
577.000
579.430
584.342
589.230
594.030
598.850
602.064
.400
.550
.400
.350
.300
.350
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
46.802
104.9
0 1N.HG
UHIFICE
PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(IN.
DESIRED
.82
.82
.02
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
H?0)
ACTUAL
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
STACK
TEMP
(DEG.F)
64.
63.
62.
62.
65.
66.
66.
65.
65.
72.
70.
69.
64.
64.
62.
63.
65.
DATE 01/20/83
RUN NUMBER PSB-3
PROBE LENGTH * TYPt 6* STEEL
NOZZLE : l.U. .148
ASSUMED MUISTUHE 1.0
SAMPLE BOX NUMHEH
METEH BOX NUMBEH F89
MF. TF.H HEAD OIFF. 2.08
PRUHE HEATEH SETTING 0.
HEATEH BOX SETTING 0.
OUT GAS METER PUMP IMPACTOR IMPINGEK
TEMP
((•EG
INLET
57.
58.
60.
61.
60.
58.
59.
60.
62.
60.
60.
61.
57.
58.
62.
65.
60.
.F)
OUTLET
61.
62.
62.
62.
*»3.
64.
64.
63.
64.
*>5.
65.
65.
63.
63.
63.
64.
63.
VACUUM
(1N.HG)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TEMP
(DEb.F)
64.
63.
62.
62.
65.
66.
66.
65.
6S.
72.
70.
69.
64.
64.
62.
63.
65.
TEMP
(UEG.F)
50.
50.
51.
53.
53.
54.
54.
54.
55.
50.
48.
48.
48.
48.
49.
50.
51.
-------
to
o
PLANT » CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLE * I.D.(IN.)
METER MEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING * I.9633E-02 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS) 10
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 58
M6/D3CM/STAGE 4
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 2
ASAKCU TACOMA
NO q SEC EX
01/80/03
PSB-3
00
65.IF 16.QC
30.00
29.78
.148
.820
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/DSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
6EO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGD (MG/OSCM)
DN/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM)
SI
I
,44
.20
,39E»01
.84
,28E»00
,29E«00
.57E-04
.62E-04
,23E*01
,47E*01
,53E«06
1.9817E
32
2
9.21
.20
1.51E-01
2.50
1.13E»00
I.10E»00
4.92E-04
4.96E-04
9.80E»00
IMPACTUK FLOHWATEI
AT IMPACTOH ClINPlTiriNS
IMPACtllW TEMP.
PAkUCLE DENS11Y1GM/CC)
MAX.PAKT1CLE D1AM.M1CKOS
GAS COHPOSITION(PEKCENI): C02
to
N2
U2
H20
SAMPLING DURATION(MIN.)
•02 GK/OSCF a.a9?8E«OI MG/ACM
S3
3
5.95
.00
SO
4
3.81
.00
S5
2.07
.20
bb.lF 18.4C
I .00
1UO.O
.00
.00
99.00
.00
1.00
9b.80
4.5348E»01 M6/D8CM
S8 FILTER
8 9
.39
.20 .60
37
7
.71
.20
O.OOE*00 O.OOE+UO l
2.50 2.50 2.17
5.63E»06
56
fc
1.00
.30
2.?feE-bI 1.51t-0t 1.51E-01 4.53E-01
I.b7 1.34 1.00
I.I3E+00 1.13E>00 9.75C-01 7.50E-01 b.OOt-01 4.50E-01
1.1«E»00 1.14E«00 9.64E-01 7.57E-U1 b.Obt-01 4.54t»01
4.92E-04 4.92E-04 4.26E-04 3.28E-U4 2.b2E-04 1.97E-04
4.96E-04 4.96E-04 4.30E-04 3.311.-04 2.b5t»04 1. 986-04
7.10E*00 a.76E»00 2.81E»00 |.aat»oO ».«lt-01 5.25£<>01 2.76E-01
0.00t»00 O.OOE»00 5.711-01 7. 171-01 I.o0t»00 5.85E-01 l.50E»00
O.OOE+00 O.OOF«00 4.93E«07 4.59E>08 3.21E^09 7.70E»09 1.37E«11
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HEHE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS.
-------
ASARCO TACOMA
NO 4 SEC EX
01/20/63
P3B-3
DO
65. If
30.00
it.IB
.148
.820
18.4C
PLANT » CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. HG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEII.D.UN.)
METER HEAD OIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING * 1.9633E-02 GR/ACF 1.98I7E.
IMPACTOR STAGE 31 32
STAGE INDEX NUMBER I 2
090 (MICROMETERS) 10.51 9.29
MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 58.20 .20
Mt/DSCM/STAGE 4.39E+01 1.51E-01
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 2.84 2.50
CUM. (M6/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050 1.28E+00 1.1SE+00
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN 050 1.29E+00 1.14E»00
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050 5.57E-04 4.92E-04
CUM. (GR/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050 5.62E-04 4.96E-04
GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS) 3.2at»01 9.88E«00
OM/DLOGO (MG/OSCM) 4.49E»01 2.80E»00
DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM) 2.51E+06 5.54E«06
IMPACTUR FLOWRATE(ACFM)
At IMPACTlW CUN01TIONS
IMPACIOM TtMp.
PARTICLE OENSIIY(GM/CC)
HAX.HAHTICLE 01AM.MICROS
GAS COMPUSITIOMPEKCENT):
C02
CO
N?
02
H20
SAMPLING DURATION(MIN.)
>02 GR/D3CF
S3 34
3 4
6.03 3.88
.00 .00
.4Mb
18. aC
I .00
100.0
.00
.00
99.00
.00
1.00
96.80
4.53«8E»01 MG/OSCM
38 FILTER
8 9
.46
.10 .60
4,«928E»01 MG/ACM
S5 36 S7
567
2.15 1.08 .78
.20 .30 .20
O.OOE*00 U.OOL4UO 1.51E-01 2.26b-01 1.51E-01 1.51E-01 4.53E-OI
2.50 2.50 2.17 1.67 1.34 1.00
1.13E»00 I.15E»00 9.75E-01 7.50E-01 6.00E-01 4.50E-01
1.14E+00 1.14t»00 9.84E-01 7.571-01 6.06E-01 4.54E-01
4.92E-04 4.92E-04 4.26E-04 3.28E-04 2.62E-04 I.97E-04
4.96E-04 4.96E-04 4.30E-04 3.3U-04 2.65E-04 1.98E-04
7.48E>00 4.84t400 2.89E*00 1.52E*00 9.|8f»01 6.03E-01 3.29E-01
O.OOE»00 0.00t»00 5.86E-OI 7.55E-01 1.09E»00 6.67E-01 l.SOE^OO
O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 4.65E+07 4.10E+OB 2.69E*0<» 5.82E»09 S.09E*IO
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO MERCER.
-------
IMPACTUR FIELD DATA TABULAUUN
PLANT-NAME AND ADDRESS TF.ST TEAM LEADER
ASARCO TACOMA 00
TEST PS8-3
NO 4 SEC EX
O
vo
TEST
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TEST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
ENGLISH UNITS
01/20/83
1616
2000
96.8
.960
.146 IN
.64
.62 IN-H2U
METRIC UNITS
01/20/63
1616
2000
96.6
.960
3.8
.64
20.8
MM
MM-I
DROP
VM VOLUME OF DRV GAS SAMPLED
AT METEH CONDITIONS
TM AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRV GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VNC VOLUME OF MATER VAPOR
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BNO PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
FMD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MD MOLECULAR NT-DRY STACK GAS
MN8 MOLECULAR MT-STACK GAS
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
P8I STATIC PRES OF STACK GAS
PS STACK PRES, ABS.
T8 AVERAGE STACK TEMP
IF GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
46.802 CU-FT
61.6 F
46.647 SCF
.471 SCF
1.00
.990
28.73
28.62
30.00 IN-HG
-3.00 IN-H20
29.78 IN-HG
65. F
47.06 ACF
1.325 CU-M
16.4 C
1.321 SCM
.013 SCM
1.00
.990
26.73
26.6?
762.00 MM-Hb
-76.20 MM-H20
756.00 MM-HG
IN. C
1.33 ACM
AS
STACK AREA
2827. SO-IN
1.824 SO-M
-------
ISO PERCENT ISOKINETIC
MT TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES
PD PARTICLE DENSITY
* 68 OE6 f, 29.92 IN.H6.
to
(-•
o
104.9
.9i>4 G»
.Ob GH/CI
ioa.9
59.900 MG
1.00 GM/CC
-------
IMPACTOR RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
PLANT-NAME AND CITY
ASARCO TACUMA
TEST DATE 01/20/83
TEST TEAM LEADER
DO
RUN N(J
PSH-3
SAMPLE LOCATION
NO » SEC bX
CALC. MASS LOADING
ro
TOTAL MASS OF PARTICLES DIVIDED BY A VOLUME. UNITS GIVEN ARE GRAINS PER
ACTUAL* CUBIC FOOT(GR/ACF),GRAINS PER DRV STANDARD** CUBIC FOOT(GR/DSCF),
MILLIGRAMS PER ACTUAL CUBIC METEK(MG/ACM) AND MILLIGRAMS PER DRV STANDARD
CUBIC METER(MG/DSCM.)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CML(GRXACF) • MT(GR) / IF(ACF)
CML • .924 /
CML(6R/DSCF) • MT(GR) / VMSTD(DSCF)
CML » . .424 /
CML(MGXACM) • MT(MG) / IF(ACM)
CML » 59.900 /
CMLCMS/OSCM) • MT(MG) / VMSTD(DSCM)
CML
050 (MICROMETERS)
59.900 /
47.063
46.647 =
1.333 =
1.321 =
.0196 GR/ACF
.0198 GR/DSCF
44.9281 MG/ACM
45.3476 MG/DSCM
THE SIZE OF THE PARTICLES UN EACH STAGE ASSUMING A SO PERCENT
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFINITION
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STAGE COLLECTED
MG/DSCM/STAGE
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PER DRY STANDARD CUBIC METER FOR EACH STAGE(MG/DSCM/STAGE)
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/DSCM/STAGE(1) = MASS(l) / VMSTD(DSCM)
MG/DSCM/STAGEd) > 56.20 /
1.321 =
43.91
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLED SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE CORRESPOND ING 050 INDICATED
FOR THAT STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM I (6) e MASS(7) » MASS(8) » MASS(9)
MT (MG)
CUM X (6) » .20 » .20 *
59.90 (MG)
• 100 =
.60
• 100 = 2.17
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME)
THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PARTICLES SMALLER IN DIAMETER
THAN THE CORRESPONDING 050. MA33/VULUME UNITS ARE MG/AC",
MG/USCM,GR/ACF,GK/USCF.
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM.(MGSACM) (5) s MASS(6) » MASS(7) » MASS(8) «• MASS(9)
IF(ACM)
CUM.(MK/ACM) (5) = .30 * .20 » .rfO »
1.33 (ACM)
.60
.98
I
M
CEO.MEAN DIA.(MICROMETERS)
THE 6EUMETRIC MEAN DIAMETER IN MICROMETERS
FOR A PARTICULAR STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
CEO.MEAN DIA.(J) c SURTt 050(J) • U51MJ-1M
GEO.MEAN DIA.(6) = SUHTC i.oa • 2.
1.52
OM/OL060CM6/09CM)
DM IS MG/DSCM/STAGE(J) AND OLUGO IS LOG10(DSO(J-l) /
050(J)) WHERE J IS THE CORRESPONDING STAGE NUMBER.
FOR STAGE 1 THE MAXIMUM PARTICLE DIAMFTEH IS USED.
FOR STAGE 9 (BACKUP FILTER) THE DSO IS ASSUMED AS
.S • DSO OF STAGE 0.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DM/OL06DCJ) = MG/DSCM/STAGEU)
LOG( D50(J-1) / DSO(J))
DM/OL06D (3) c .00
LOG( 9.29 /
-- x
6.03 )
.00
DN/DLOGD THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES PER UNIT VOLUME FOR A STAGE.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
DN/DL060U) s OM/DLUGDU)
S.23599E-10 * PD(GMXCC) * GEO.MEAN DIA.(J)
DN/DL06D (3) * .00
b.235999E-10 • 1.00 • >.a8
• CALCULATED AT STACK CONDITIONS
** CALCULATED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
68 OE6.F AND 29.92 INCHES OF HG (760 MMHG)
.00
-------
FIELD DATA
ro
M
U)
PLANT A3ARCU TACOMA
SAMPLING LOCATION NO 4 SEC EX
SAMPLE TYPE PAHT SIZE-BLOW
OPERATOR DU
AMBIENT TEMP. (OEG.F) 55.
BAR. PRESS. (IN. HG) 29.70
STATIC PRESS. (IN. H20) -3.00
FILTER NUMBER(S) MARK 111
STACK INSIDE DIM. (IN) bO.OO .00
PITOT TUBE COEFF. .84
THERM. NO.
LEAKAGE .000 CFM a
METER CALIB. FACTOR .980
READ I RECORD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NO.
INIT
SAMPLE
TIME
(MIN.)
0
5.0
10.0
15.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
25.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
70.9
7B.5
90.0
100.0
10B.9
120.0
130.0
140.0
146.5
160.0
170.0
160.0
190.0
199.9
CLOCK
TIME
(24-HR
ft f!f*K %
l*L vl*™ J
1607
0
0
1622
1706
. 0
1716
1739
0
0
0
0
0
1626
1903
0
0
2036
0
0
0
2116
0
0
0
0
2211
EVERY 5.0
GAS METER
READING
(CU.FT.)
615.937
618.320
620.710
623.046
628.738
631.170
633.577
640.409
642.620
647.650
652.990
657.850
662.710
663.137
667.191
672.720
677.550
681.640
687.240
692.100
696.970
701.097
706.630
711.510
716.400
721.280
725.648
MINUTES
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN.H20)
.450
.30V
.400
.500
.300
.350
.500
.500
.500
.500
.500
.550
.500
.550
.550
.550
.550
.550
.550
.500
.550
.550
.550
.550
.450
.550
0 IN.HG
ORIFICE
OATE 01/22/83
HUN NUMBER PSB-4
PHUBE LENGTH H TYPE 6* STtEL
NOZ7LE : l.U. .148
ASSUMED MOISTURE 1.0
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMHEP FB9
METER HEAD OIFF. 2.08
PROBE HEATER SETTING 0.
HEATER BUX SETTING 0.
PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(IN.
DESIRED
.62
.62
.82
.82
.82
.82
.62
.62
.02
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.62
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.62
.82
.62
H2U)
ACTUAL
.62
.82
.62
."2
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.82
.62
.82
.82
.62
.82
.82
.82
.82
.62
.82
.82
.82
.62
.82
.«2
STACK
TFMP
(OEG.F)
64.
62.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
66.
64.
62.
62.
63.
62.
56.
62.
62.
60.
69.
64.
62.
61.
69.
63.
62.
61.
61.
OUT GAS
METER
TEMP
(DEC
INLET
46.
«9.
50.
60.
53.
53.
60.
58.
61.
64.
65.
65.
67.
56.
54.
56.
59.
61.
62.
64.
65.
64.
65.
66.
66.
67.
.F)
OUTLET
54.
54.
54.
61.
58.
58.
61.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
64.
60.
60.
60.
61.
62.
63.
63.
64.
65.
65.
65.
66.
PUMP
VACUUM
(IN.HG)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
IMPACTUR
TEMP
(OEG.F)
64.
62.
63.
63.
63.
63.
63.
66.
64.
62.
62.
63.
62.
56.
62.
62.
60.
69.
64.
62.
61.
69.
63.
62.
61.
61.
IMPINGER
TEMP
(DEG.F)
49.
49.
49.
49.
50.
50.
51.
47.
47.
47.
47.
48.
46.
48.
45.
45.
45.
45.
45.
46.
46.
47."
47.
47.
45.
45.
TOTALS
AVERAGE
199.9
97.189
.62
.62
63.
6V.
61.
.0
63.
47.
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
96.6
-------
ASARCO TACUMA
NO 4 sec ex
01/22/83
PSB-0
DO
62.9F 17.2C
21.70
29.48
.148
.820
PLANT & CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
OAT6
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAR.PRESS.(IN. M6)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLElI.D.dN.)
METER NEAO DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING » 5.4737E-03 GR/ACF 5.55766-
IMPACTOR STAGE 81 S2
STAGE INDEX NUMBER 1 2
> 090 (MICROMETERS) 10.40 9.18
I
to MASS (MILLIGRAMS) 31.40 .00
\->
** MG/D3CM/8TAG6 1.156*01 0.006*00
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050 9.25 9.29
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN OSO 1.166*00 1.166*00
CUM. (M6/08CM) SMALLER THAN 050 1.18E»00 1.186*00
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050 5.066-04 5.066-04
CUM. (GR/08CF) SMALLER THAN 050 5.10E-04 5.14E-04
CEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS) 3.236*01 9.776*00
OM/OLOGD (MG/DSCM) 1.17E+01 O.OOE*00
ON/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLE8/D3CM) 6.666*05 0.006*00
IMPACTUH FLOWRATE(ACFM)
•T IHPACTOK CONDITIONS
IMPAC1UR TEMP.
PARTICLE OEN3ITY(GH/CC)
MAX.PAHTICLE DIAM.MICROS
GAS COMPUSITION(PERCENT):
SAMPLING OURATION(MIN.)
•03 GR/DSCF
S3 SO
3 4
5.93 3.79
.50 .30
.488
62.9F 17.2C
1.00
100.0
C02 .00
CO .00
N2 99.00
02 .00
H20 1.00
199.90
1.2718C+01 MG/DSCM
38 FILTER
8 9
.39
.80 .BO
1.252be»01 MG/ACM
35 36 87
567
2.06 1.00 .70
.20 .30 .30
1.83E-OI 1.10E-V1 7.33E-02 1.10E-01 I.10E-OI 2.936-01 2.936-01
7.80 6.94 6.36 5.49 4.62 2.31
9.77C-01 8.69e-OI 7.96C-01 6.88E-01 5.79E-OI 2.90E-01
9.92E-01 8.82E-U1 8.096-01 6.98E-01 5.886-01 2.94E-01
4.27E-04 3.80E-04 3.486-04 3.01E-04 2.536-04 1.276-04
4.346-04 3.85E-04 3.536-04 3.056-04 2.576-04 I.286-04
7.386*00 4.74E«00 2.806*00 I.43E«00 8.386-V1 5.236-01 2.756-01
9.666-01 5.666-01 2.776-01 3.486-01 7.286-01 1.13fc»00 9.73E-01
4.596*06 1.01t»07 2.426*07 2.256*08 2.366*09 1.516*10 B.«TE»|0
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE 20 DEGC AND 760MM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HER6 ACCORDING 10 THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS.
-------
ASAKCD IACUMA
NU a stc KX
PSH-<4
DO
29.70
.148
.820
PLANT K CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
STACK TEMP.
BAN.PRESS.(IN. MG)
STACK PRESS.(IN. HG)
NOZZLEM.o.(IN.)
METER HEAD DIFF.
CALC. MASS LOADING = 5.4737E-03 GN/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBtR
050 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/D3CM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DSCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 05U
CUM. (GR/OSCF) SMALLER THAN 050
6EO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DL060 (MG/DSCM)
DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/OSCM)
IMHALIIIU FLMH4ATL ( ATFM)
A! INiMACIMH CONDI T IIINS
SI
1
10.48
31.40
1.15E*01
<».85
1 .tt.E»00
1 .lflt«00
5.06fc-0«
5.14E-04
HAK11CI> DKNbl I Y (f'M/CC)
MAX.HAKUCLE 01 AM. MICROS
GAS CDMMUSI T IIIN(PhKCENl ) !
hb b.OI 3.87
.00 .50 .30
o.oot+oo i.HSE-oi i.int-ui
9.25 7.HO b.9«
l.lbb+00 9.77E-01 t
1.1HK»00 V.42F.-01 ^
5.0bt-00 4.27t-04 3.80E-04 3.48E-04 3.01L-04 2.b3t-04 1,27t-0«
4.34t-04 3.8Sf04 3.53E-04 3.0bt-«4 2.57f04 1.2«E-00
/.4hk»00 4.8?L»00 2.8HE*00 l.tj?E»00 9.1SK-01 b.Ott-Ot 3.28E-OI
«».7bE-01 5.7bk-01 2.85L-01 3.bhE-Ol 7.92E-01 1.30t»00 9.73E-OI
<*.4«»E»Ob 9.7t)K»Ob 2.21t»07 2.01K»ufl 1.98t*09 1.I4E»10
O.UOL+UO
0.00t+0d
STANDARD CONDITIONS ARE ?0 DEGC ANU 7hOMM HG.
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HE"K. ACCOMDING 10 Mt»«lEM.
-------
1MPACTUR FIELD DA1A TAHIILATJUN
PLANT-NAME AND AOORtSS TFST TEAM
A9ARCO TACOMA 0(1
TEST PSB-0
NU a StC EX
TEST
TB
TF
TT
Y
ON
CP
PM
DATE
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NET TIME OF TFST, MIN.
METER CALIBRATION FACTON
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE ORIFICE PRESSURE
ENGLISH UNITS
01/22/H3
1607
199.9
.9dO
.!t'/h3
ibur
199.9
.9«0
3.« MM
.««
20.8 MM-
TM
VMSTO
VMC
BNO
FMD
MO
MNS
PB
PSI
PS
TS
IF
DROP
VOLUME OF ORT GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
VOLUME OF WATER VAPOW
AT STANDARD CONDIUONS*
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOLUME
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
MOLECULAR MT-DRY STACK GAS
MOLECULAR NT-STACK GAS
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PKES OF STACK GAS
STACK PRES. ABS.
AVERAGE STACK TEMP
GAS SAMPLED AT
STACK CONDITIONS
97.IB9 CU-f-T
60.6 F
96.077 SCF
.970 SCF
I .00
.990
2H.73
29.7u IN-HG
-3.00 IN-H20
29.08 IN-HP,
63. (•
CU-M
15.9 C
2.721 SCM
.027 SCM
I .00
.990
3W MM-Hb
-76. iV MM-Hc'O
70B.78 MM-HO
17. t
i.lb ACM
STACK AREA
t!«i»7. SU-IN
S'1-M
-------
ISO PbRCENT ISOKINMIC
MT TOTAL MASS UF PAHTICUS
PD PARTlCLt DENSITY
• 60 UEG f, 29.9,? IN.HG.
I
to
(-•
•~J
.Ob I;K/LI
)U.b(IU Ml
I .11(1
-------
IMPACTUR Rtf SUITS AND EXAMPLI C Al CIIL A T | U
PLANT-NAME AMP CITY
ASARCO TACUMA
TEST DATfc 01/22/83
TtS I IEAM Lt AOfck
1.1)
SAMPLE LUC A I ION
Nil 0 SEC t X
00
CALt. MASS LOADING
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CMUGR/ACF) = MT(G») / IF(ACF)
CML = ,5J« / 97.b'jO =
CML(G»/DSCF) a MT(GH) / VMSTrMUSff-)
CML = .530 / 9b.u7f =
CMLCMG/ACM) = MT(MG) / IF(ACM)
CML = 3<*.bOO / 2.7h«? =
CML(Mi;/DSCM) = MT(MG) / VMSTD(DSCM)
CML = 3«.bOO / 2.721 =
TOIAL MASS OF PARTICLES UIVIOEU HY A VOLUME. OHMS GIVEN Akt GRAINS PER
ACIUAL* CUHIC FUUT (Gk/ACF ) DRAINS PhH IIKT STANI)AHM«« ClltUC MjD T (liH /1>SCF ) ,
MILLI'iHAMS PEW Af.rUAl. CUHIC METFM (Mli/ACM) AfJI) MTLl.ir,k»MS Pfctf DKY
CUHIC Mt f E
P.k/ACF
.0056 Gk/USCF
I?.7176 MG/UStM
050 (MICROMETERS)
THE Slit OF THt PARTICLES ON EACH STAGE ASSUMING A bO
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY DEFlNIilUN
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
THE MASS ON EACH STALE 'OLLFCTED
M6/USCH/STAGE
THE MASS LOADING FOR EACH STAGE. UNITS GIVEN ARE MILLIGRAMS
PEN UMY STANDAkl) CUBIC METEH FUR EACH S T AGE (MG/DSCM/S T AGE )
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
MG/DSCM/STAGEU) = MASS(l) / VMSTIHUSCM)
MG/DSCM/STAGE(1) = 31.40 /
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS
1 1 .50
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL MASS SAMPLEO SMALLER
IN DIAMETER THAN THE CO»RF SPUNDI Ni: 1)50 INPITATEI)
M)K THAT STAGE
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
CUM X (b) = MASS(7) + MASS(R) » MASS19)
MT (Hli)
CUM X (h) = .30 » .80 » .80
40.hU (MH)
• 100 =
• 100 =
-------
CUM.(MASS/VOLUME) THE CUMULATIVE MASS LOADING OF PAH1ICI.KS SMALLt" IN UlAMtlb«
THAN I Hfc COHRFSPUNUINi; ObO. MASS/VOI.U^t UMTS
MG/OSCM.l.W/ACF ,
EXAMPLE CALCOLATIONS
CUM.(MGXACM) (S) = MASS(b) * MASS(7) » MASS(B) » MASS(9)
1F(ALMJ
CUM.(MGXACM) (5) = .30 * .30 » .80 » .BO
= >eo
?./b (ACM)
GEO.MEAN D1A.(MICROMETERS) IHE GEOMETRIC MFAN 01AMEILM IU M1CKDMF. I EMS
FUH A PAMTK.ULAU STAUb.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
GEO.MEAN UIA.U) = SURTC o^ouj * usu(j-it)
GEO.MEAN ou.rb) = SUHTC i.o; • z.iaj = i.Se;
i
J^ DM/DLOGDCMG/DSCM) OM IS MG/DSCM/STAGE(J) AND OLOGO IS LOb1U(05U(J-I) /
VO DSO(J)) HHtHE J IS THE COtfHFSPONUlNIi SfAGF NUMHFH.
FOK STAGE 1 THE MAXIMUM PAHTICLE DIAMfctEK IS USED.
FOH STAGE t (HACKHP FILTER) THE 050 IS ASSUMED »S
.i • D-jO OF STAGt B.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
OM/OLOGDU) = MG/DSCM/STAGF.CJ)
LUG( ObO(J-l) / DbO(JJ)
OM/OLOGO (3) = .18
LUG( 9.5 UEG.F AND <>9.92 INCHES OF HG ChO MMHb)
-------
END OF PHUliHAM
:FlLt FTNtO = CIUH01DA,OU»
:FILE
:RUN
END OF PROGRAM
:FILE
:FILE FTNn9=CIOROai)A,OLO
:RUN
I
ro
to
o
-------
,a9F.»OU
.51E»00
.50E»00
.55E*00
.57E»00
.5HF.»00.
.66E*OU
.73E*00
.7hE»00
,78E»OU
.81E»00
I .8«E»00
1 ,9SK«00
2.0HE»00
2.56E»00
3.0bF-01
-01
0.93E-01
5.45E-01
h.01F-01
AS ARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SI/E IHS rw IHOt IONS
RMOs 1.00 GM/CC
MEAN CUMIILAtlVt UHftH CUNFIUENCt
INTERVAL D1AMETEH MASS CONCENTNAIIUN LiHll
(MICKIINS) (Mf./ACM) (MC./AtM)
2.73E-01
2.95E-01
3.20E-01
3.49E-01
3.8?E-OJ
0.20E-01
4.62E-01
5.09E-01
5.61E-01
6.17E-01
b.78E-01
7.43E-OI
8.I2E-01
8.8bE-01
9.37E-01
9.72E-01
l.03E*00
1.10E+00
1 ,I7E*00
1.23E»00
1.29E»00
1.33F + 00 , 19
1 20
K) ji
M 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
07
08
09
50
51
52
2.50E-01
2.7IE-01
2.95E-01
3.20E-01
3.47E-01
3.77E-01
4.09E-01
4.45E-01
4.83E-01
5.24E-01
5.69E-01
6.18E-OI
6.71E-01
7.28E-01
7.91E-01
8.58E-01
9.32E-01
I.OIE'OO
1.10E»00
1.19E+00
1.29E»00
1.41E+00
1.53E*00
1.66E+00
I.80E+00
1.95E»00
2.I2E+OU
2.30E+00
2.50F.»00
2.71E«00
2.95E»00
3.20E+00
3.47E»00
3.77E«00
4.09E*00
a.45E+00
0.83E»00
5.24E«00
5.b9£»00
6.18E»00
6.ME»00
7.28E«00
7.91E»00
8.58E»00
9.32E«00
.01E»OI
,|OE»01
.19E«01
.29E»01
.01E»01
.53E*01
l.»»bE*01
7. 50E-01
H.OJE-"!
B.78E-01
9.59E-01
.01E+OU
.1 1E»00
,haF.»OU
.b7E»OU
,h9F.«00
.ME»«0
.75E»00
,7fE»00
.7-*F.«00
,8<«E»OU
.8I>K«UU
,b9F.»OU
W CONFIOtNtE
LIMIT
I'M,/ACM)
3.31E-01
l.itt-Ot
a.736-01
5. / IC-OI
b.»«E-01
«.b«E-OI
0 I E * 0 1)
.13E+UO
,1HE»00
c!bE»00
,3at»oo
,3bE»UO
.376*00
.39E»00
.08E+00
,«3E»00
.«JOE*00
,b2E»00
.•j«E»00
.bOE»00
,b3E»UO
,b5E»00
,70E»00
./5E*00
.77F. + UO
.i ;F.«OO
-------
53 1
54 1.9bE»01 3.9bF.»UU 9F»00 H.hVF«00 7.^'»E*(Mi
59 2.95E»01 9.h5F»00 1.0bF«01 H.rtltt»00
60 3.2UE*01 1.13t»01 1.231*01 l.oat*01
61 3.47E*01 1.3IF+U1 l.«lf+01
62 3.77E*01 J.fl«»F.»01
63 0.09E+01 l.bflE«Ol
64 4.45E»01 l.flbE»01
65 4.83E»OI 2.05F+U1
66 5.24E«OI
67 5.69E»01
68 6.18E + 01 ?.SbE + OI r'./lF + 'M
69 b.71E + 0! 2.72E*01 ?.B/E*OI c!.bbE»01
70 7.28E*01 2.8bE*Ul ^.OdF+IU c*.7nt»ti1
71 7.91E*OI 3.00E*01 ».lbf*«'l
72 8.58E»01 3.12E*01 3.2BE*01
73 «».32E»01 3.2JE«01 3.«Ut»01 3.<)7E»01
10
to
to
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SI78 OlStHlHul I (INS
RHO« 1.00 6M/CC
INTERVAL OIAMETEH HtCOROS EXCLUDED fHUM MtAN
CUMULATIVE MASS) CONCI-N I h A M(1N
1
2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
te 21
1 22
ro 23
K 2a
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
46
49
50
51
52
53
2.50E-01
2.71E-01
2.95E-OI
3.20E-01
3.47E-01
3.77E-01
4.09E-OI
4.45E-OI
4.83E-01
5.24E-01
5.69E-01
6.18E-01
6.71E-01
7.28E-01
7.91E-01
8.58E-01
9.32E-01
.01E»00
,IOE*00
,19E»00
,29E«00
,41E*00
,53E*00
.bbE»00
,fll;E»00
.95E»00
2.12E«00
2.30E*00
2.50E«00
2.71E»00
2.95E«00
3.20E«00
3.47E»00
3.77E*00
4.09E»00
4.45E«00
0.83E+OU
5.24E«OU
5.69E«00
6. I8E»00
6.71E*00
7.28E«00
7.91E*00
8.5BF«00
9.32E»00
.OIE«01
.10E«01
.19E»Ot
.29E*01
.4IE401
.53E*01
.b6E«Ul
. 8Ut »01
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
?
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
-------
50
55
56
57
56
59
60
61
62
63
60
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
1.95E»01
2.12E+01
2.30E+OI
2.50E*01
2.71E»01
2.95E*01
3.20E+01
3.«7E»OI
3.776*01
0.09E*01
fl.*5E*01
fl.83E»01
5.24E^OI
5.69E»01
6.1SE+01
6.7IE»01
7.28E»01
7.91E*Ol
e.5«E»OI
9.32E*Ot
a
a
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
N>
ro
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLt SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
UHPhR CUNFIUENCE
ON LIMIT
IPEkLtNT)
5.9bF-Ol
RHO« 1.00
INTERVAL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
> 20
1 21
M a
1° 23
in f3
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
GM/CC
DIAMETER
(MICRONS)
2.50E-U!
2.7IE-01
2.95E-01
3.20E-01
3.47E-01
3.77E-01
4.09E-01
4.45E-01
4.83E-01
5.24E-01
5.69E-01
6.18E-01
6.71E-01
7.28E-01
7.91E-01
8.5BE-01
9.5«>E-01
1.01E*00
1.IOE+00
1 ,19E*00
1.29E*00
1.41E*00
1.53E«00
1 ,66E*00
1.80E«00
1.95E*00
2.12E*00
2.30E*00
2.50E*00
2.71E*00
2.95E*00
3.20E+00
3.a7E*00
3.77E*00
4.09E»00
4.45E*00
4.83E*UU
5.24E*00
5.69E*00
b,18E*00
1>.71E*OU
7 .20E*00
7.91E*00
8.58E»00
9.32E*00
1.01E*OI
1.IOE*01
I.I9E*01
1.29E*01
1.4IE*01
1.53E*U1
1.66E*01
1 ,80E*01
MEAN CUMULAT
MASS CONCENTK
(PERCtNT J
5.80E-OI
6.26E-01
6.80E-01
T.02F.-01
fl.l?E-OI
8.92E-OI
9.B1E-01
.08F»OU
.I9E*00
.31E*00
,44E*OU
,58E*00
,72E»00
,BBF.»00
,99E»00
2.06E*00
?.1BF*00
2.3SE*00
2.49E*00
?o6?E*OU
2.73F*0«
P.82E*00
i?.90E*00
2.97E*00
3.02E*00
3.07E*00
3.11E*00
3.14E»00
3.1 7E*00
3.20E*OU
3.23E *00
3.2f»E*00
3.29E*00
3.33E»00
3.36E»0«
3.40E*00
3.44E*00
3.«9E*00
3.53E»00
3.5BE*00
3.b3E*00
3.6BE*00
3.73E*00
3.79E*00
3.85E«OU
3.91E*00
3.99E*00
4.14F.*00
4.02E*00
4 .B5E*00
5.uat*no
6.^SE*OU
7 .?hE*00
7.11E-01
7.B1E-01
fl.bOF-01
,ObE*00
, lbE*OU
,«IE»UO
70E«00
BbF*()U
e.04E*00
c».70E*00
^.B3E*00
3.19E»00
3.29E*00
3.33E*00
3.36E*00
3.39E»00
3.43E*00
3.49E«00
3.5bE»00
1.591*00
3.b3E*00
3.67E»00
3.7U+OU
5.81E»00
3.9bE«00
u.Oi*E*00
1.0BE*00
«00
»l»0
•«00
S.70E*00
b.51E*00
CUNFIUINCE
LIMIT
PtKCENT)
b.b3E-01
b.«BE-01
/.08F-OI
».3bk-OJ
M.16E-OI
.01E*OU
.10E*00
.2IE*00
,33E»00
*00
.7 3E*00
.«»IE*OU
t!.00t»00
«?. ISt»OU
^.51E»Olt
«!.75E*00
r'.HOE + OO
i».85t»00
i.B8E*00
•».92E»00
2.95E*00
i?.9HE»00
5.01E*00
3.04E*UO
3.07E*00
3.1«E*00
3.18E*OV
3.dbt*UO
3.31E*00
3.«0t*00
3.ast*oo
3.bOE*00
3.bbE*00
3.bBE*00
a. |9t»00
«.blt+00
b.l»E*00
•>.V«»E«00
-------
50 l.95E»OI 8.0l)fc»OU H.7ttt»OU H.Olt+Od
55 2.I2E+01 9.7bE»UU 1.0<>E»U1
•»b ?.30E»01 1.1^f. + Ut I.l9f+01
57 a.50t»0t I.37F*01 I
56 2.71E»01 1.7Ct»Ol l
59 a.95E»ui a.oof«oi r
60 3.£OE*OI ^.«1f*01 c
fcl 3.«7E»OJ a.79E*01 3.00t»OI
62 3.T7E»01 3.17E«01 3.«1E»OI
63 4.09E+01 3.5bE«OI 3.81F+01 i.31t*OI
6fl «.«5E»01 3.9fcE»01 *.2£l*fil
65 «.»3E»01 q.30K*01 u.bt*0l
69 6.71E + 01 5.77E»01 6.0<>.70F.»Ol
72 8.58E»Ol b.63E + OI b.97E*01
73 9.32E»01 b.87E*01 7.22E*01
I
to
NJ
-------
ro
N)
RHO« 1.00
INTERVAL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
It
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ASARCO AVERAGE
GM/CC
D1AMETEH
2.50E-OI
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.83E-01
5.69E-01
6.71E-01
7.91E-01
9.32E-01
1.IOE+00
1.29E«00
1.53E+OU
1.80E+00
2.12E»00
2.50E«00
2.95E*00
3.47E+OV
4.09E«00
«.83E»OU
5,696*00
b.71E»00
7.91E»00
9.32E*00
1.10E«OI
1.29E»Ol
1.53E»OI
1.80E«01
i? • 1 2E *0 1
2»50F. *OI
2.95E»01
3.«7E«01
4.09E«01
4.83E»OI
5.69E*01
6.71E*01
7.91E»01
9.32E»01
PAHTICLE SI/E D1S1HIHU1 IONS
MEAN CHANUt
IN MASS CUNCkNl>y*1 IUN
(MG/DNM3)
7.70E-01
1.0IE*00
I.53E»00
1.7VE»00
2.0«4E»OU
1 .OOE«00
9.30E-01
1.84E«00
1.35E»OU
9.57E-01
b.blE-01
O.B1E-OJ
4.09E-01
4.1SE-01
3.50E-01
5.81E-01
5.b«E-01
b,!3E-01
b.b^E-01
7.3JE-01
1.33E«0«J
fl.7bE»00
8.B7E*00
I.3«E»01
l.9bE»01
4.72E»01
5.I1E+01
4.73E»OI
tt«UI
»01
-------
ASARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SUE UISlHldul IONS
RMO« 1.00 GM/CC
INTERVAL 01AMETEW RECORDS EXCLUDED FROM
CHANGE IN MASS CUNTHAMUN
ro
oo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ta
19
2«
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
2.SOE-01
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.63E-01
5.69E-01
b. 716-01
7.91E-01
9.32t-01
1.10E»00
1.29E*00
1.53E»00
1.80E+UO
2.12E»00
2.50E»00
2.95E+00
3.47E*00
4.09E»00
fl.83E»00
5.fc9E*00
6.71E»00
7.91E*00
9.32F.*00
1.10E»OJ
1.29E*01
1.5JE»01
1.80E*OI
2.I2E+01
2.50E«01
2.95E»01
3.47E»01
fl.09E»01
«.83E»01
5.(>9E*01
6.7IE»OI
7.91E»01
9.32E*01
4
4
4
4
a
a
4
2 4
2 4
4
a
a
4
a
4
4
? 4
4
4
4
4
4
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONF
NONE
NONE
-------
to
to
RMCte 1.00
INTERVAL
t
2
3
4
5
7
a
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ASARCO AVERAGE PAW'JCLt Sl/fc
GM/Ct
IUIMS
OIAMEUH
2.SOE-01
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.83E-01
5.69E-01
6.71E-01
7.91E-01
9.32E-01
1.10E+00
I.29E»00
l.53E*00
l.BUE+00
2.12E*00
2.SOE«00
2.95E»00
3.47£»OU
4.09E»00
4,83E»OU
5.69E*00
6.71E»00
7.91£»00
9.32E*00
1.10E»01
1.29E»01
1.53E»01
1.80E»01
2.12E«01
2.50E»01
3.47E«01
a.09E»01
4.83E»01
5.bV£»01
b.71E»01
7.91E*01
9.32E»OI
IN
MEAN CHANGE
CU»ttNlMAlIUH
(NU/ONM3)
V.77E»10
.8bt.»10
2.I9E»09
1 ,19£*09
S.14E40R
2.|7E«08
9.bOt»07
5.00k»07
3.09E*07
1 ,b!E*07
t .45£»07
4.|9E»Ob
t,9at»0b
4.19E»Ob
a.7bt»0b
1.45E»06
8.b9£«05
2.71E»05
7.IbE»U«
STANOAHO
01V 1*1 I UN
(NU/UNM3)
0.30E»IO
3.41E*IU
1,0/E»09
3.74E«0«
l.lbC»00
4.83E*07
2,bUE»07
9.93£«0b
I ,09F*t)/
9.0«t*0b
4.b3E»Ob
l.83E»Ob
9.4«*E»Ob
t.a«e»0b
\.'.
^.37E»Ob
3.00E»Ob
5.0lt»0«
CONF IDI-NCE
I IM1 I
1NII/UNM3)
9.S7E*10
4.78k*IO
3.57E*IO
I .'
4.03E»0<*
S.93E»0«*
.19E»OB
I.97E»07
I.39E»07
S.ObE»Ob
3.14E»Ob
-------
USARCO AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE D IS1RJ HUl 1UNS
RHO* 1.00 GM/CC
INTERVAL DI»METEH RECORDS EXCLUDED FROM MUN
CHANGE IN NUMriErt CONLtMf»I I UN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
1 21
to 22
W 23
0 24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
3«
35
36
37
2.50E-01
2.95E-01
3.47E-01
4.09E-01
4.83E-01
5.b9E-01
6.7U-01
7.91E-01
9.32E-01
1.10E*OU
1.29E*00
1 .bit«00
l.«OE»00
2.12E»00
2.50E*00
2.95E»00
3.a/E»00
«.09E+00
4.63E+00
5.6<»E»00
6.71E*OU
7.9IE*00
9.32E*OU
I.10E+01
1 ,29E»01
1.53E»OJ
1.80E»01
2.I2E*01
2.50E»01
2.95E*01
3.47E*01
4.09E»01
«.63E«01
5.69E»01
6.71E»01
7.91E»OI
9.3dE»01
4
U
It
4
U
(1
(1
i. 4
f 4
4
It
It
a
4
4
4
2 4
4
4
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
-------
I- 1 K U • 11A 1 A
PLANf
SAMPLING LUCA1 tOM
SAMPLE lYPt
UPtMATUH
AMblENI TEMP. (OEG. F)
HAM. PRESS. ( IN. Hb)
MEU.N CAL1U. FACTuft
Ht AD 8 NbCUHl) DATA K
SAMPLE
HMt
(M1N.) (
0
5.0
I0.li
15.0
20.0
25.0
•M 30.0
1 35.0
to
W TOTALS 35.0
M AVERAGE
AbAKCU
NO M bttllivllANY trXHAUSI
Mb 1 HUO b
SCHbH t- tL
U4.
30.^6
.<*e»
VtKY b.O MJNUlkS
CLUCK bAS MEUK UWY GAS M£tEI<
TIME hbAUlNb ffcMP
a«-MH (CU.I-1.) IMbb.F)
I Nit 1
1605 53B.07*
1 bl 0 b«3.00ti 51 .
Ibl5 54B.OOO 57.
IbdO 550. bOO bli.
lb«?5 5b5.000 be?.
Ib30 55B.OOO b«.
!63S 5b2.00u Hi.
\bSB 5t>
-------
SHLFUk
MKLI> IIA1A H KEbULKS IAHIILAUUM
E VA 'It I HIM) b
PLANT- NAMt AND AOOfcESS TEbl IEAM
ASAHCO bLHEF^EL
TEST HS02-I Nil 4 SECONDARY EXHAUSI
TEST DA IE
Tb
TF
TT
y
VM
TM
VMSTD
PB
U)
ro VT
VTB
VSULN
VA
oa
OS
N
csoa
SU?PPH
S02HR
TIMt-STARI
UME-FIMSH
LNbLISM UUlTb
ui/
IbUb
NET I1ME OF TEST,
METER CALIBRATION FACTOR
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METEH CONDI1IONS
AVEKAGfc GAS METEk TEMP
VOLUME UF ONY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
HAHUMETHIC PHESSOHE
VOLUME OF BARIUM PERCHLURATE
TITHANT USEO FOR SAMPLE
VOLUME OF BARIUM PERCHLUHATE
11 IMAM FUH THE BLANK
TOTAL VOLUME UF SOLUTION 1000. ML
FUH THE SULFUR DIOXIDE
VOLUME UF SAMPLE ALIUUIIf i>
-------
OJ
tXAMHtt SIJLFIIK IlKlXlhF CALUlLA I JUUS Ibbl M
NO 4 8F.CUNIIAKY hXMAUSI
VULHMb (^ UHY GAS SAMPLHI AT blANDAKU C I)NI> 1 I J IIUS
VMSTO = I/. 607 • VM • Y • (Ph ) I (1M + UbO.J
17.6<47 • ?5.5^3 • ,9«H • 311. ^t,
VMSTO = — --------- --------------------------- =
CONCtNIKAT ION UF 302 AT STANDARD CIMUMIONS
CSUa = 7.06 • I0««(-b) • N * (WT - VIB) • VSUL(^ / VA )/VMSTI)
7.06 • 10«*(-5) *.0097 • ( 1.16 - .tb) »1000.U / e!0.0 )
CS08 = - --- --- --------------------------------------------------------- = .1/41 • lU**(-5) Lb/USCF
CONCENTRATION UF S03 BY VULUMt
SO«?PPM = 030.0 • (VT - VTB) « M • VSOLN
• VA
030.0 • ( 1.5 - .15 ) * .009/ «1000.0
S02PHM = -- - ---- - - ---------- — ------- — ..-.-....-.. = 10.60 PHM
£"3.16 • ^0.0
CONCtNIHATlUN UF SU2 IN LBS/HK
SOiHK s CS08 • 10««(-5) * OS
S02HK = .!/ • 10*«(-^) * .0 = .UIM) LHS/MW
-------
MtLU DA tA
PLAN! ASAKCU
SAMPLlNI. LUCAIIUIM Nil «4 bECUMlAWl bXHAUSI
SAMPLE TYPE SUc-
UPEHOUW SLHtFFEL
AMblEM lEMP.tUEG.M 4V.
HAW.PWESS. (1N.HG) 5S.
«?7.0 17«f(l 5B5.'4iO bb.
TOTALS 9
j> AVERAGE bb.O
to
U)
UAIt Ul/14/Hif
hl/N NIJMHEH HSUtf-c:
KKUHE LENGIM R IYPE 5 Fl GLASS
SAMPLE HUX NllMBb'K
1-iETtK H0« NUMHtW Fbb
HWUHb 'HbAlbK SblTING ebO.
IMP1NGEH Pt«tENT
IEMH OF
(Ohb.t- ) CUNSIANI
U A ( 1-
K A 1 t
59. IIT.5B
59. 71.40
b9. lll.U^
59.
-------
\SULFUK UlU«J»b MELD DATA h htSULlb IAHULAI1UN
tPA MLIHIIO b
PLANT- NAME AHO AUOHESS
ASARCU
TtSf PSO.?-£ NO « SECONDARY EXHAUSI
TESI ItAM LtAulH
ro PB
01
TEST DAIE
TB TIME-START
TF IIMt-FINISH
TT Nt T IIME UF TEST, MIN.
Y MEIER CALIBRATION FACTOR
VM VOLUME UF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METER CUNUIUONS
TM AVERAbb GAS METER TEMP
VMSTD VULUMt UF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
bAROMLTKlC PRESSURE
VT VOLUME UF BARIUM PERCHLUHAIt
TI IRANI USEO FOR SAMPLE
VTB VOLUME UF BARIUM PERCHLURATE
TIIHANI FOR THE HLANK
VSOLN TOTAL VOLUME OF SOLUTION
FUR THE SULFUR DIOXIDE
VA VOLUME UF SAMPLE ALIOUUT
11TKAIEU
02 UXYbEn , PERCENT
OS FLOW NATE
N MlKMALllY OF BARIUM
TITRANT
CS02 ClINCtNTKATION OF SULFUR UlUXlUE
OHY HAS1S, S1NO. CONDITIONS
SU2PPM CUNCENINAI ION UF SULFUR
010XIOF. HY
9U2HR LBS OF SULFUR
HUUh
tcMGLISM
Ul
IN-Ml,
3.8 ML
ML
IUUU. ML
HI. ML
MEr«it UNI is
u 111
b
t
^r .
l\ .0«J9 CU-F t
bb.O F
«M.5.JS SCF
,b»7 LU-l
IB. j C
.blO SCM
7t»0.bO HM-Hb
.0 t
.0 SCFH
.009/ MILLtUUl VALtNTS/ML
,b»» * 10««(-b) LM/UbCF
.000 I Mij/HK
• bH Dtb Ff i»«».92 Iln.HU. fHHY HAbIS
-------
tXAMPLt SULFUK DIOXIDE C AL t HL A I I UiJh Itbl iuj.»'Sll«!-d
NU 4 SECONDARY EXHAUSI
VOLUME 1th UWY U«b SAMPLtli Al SIANDAKU U(iNi) I 1 1
VMbtU = 17.b«7 • VM • t • (PB ) / (TM + «MJ.)
\
VMSfO =
( hS.O » UbO.J
c-l.blb IKS
CONCtNIWA I ION OF SU8 Al STANDARD CUNUIIIUNS
CSU8 = 7. Ob • IO**(-5) * N • (VT - VlH) • VSULN / VA )/VMSM)
7. Oh • IO««(-5) *.OU97 • ( 3.«3 - .Ib) *1UOO.O /
--------- - ----------- -
^1 .b?
.5flb • 10«*(-b) Lb/OStF
CONCENTHAT10N UK 30d BY VOLUME
I 302PPM = 430.0 * (VT - VTB) * N • VSOLN
to _._._.....___. __ ..... __ ....
SOiPHM =
• VA
430.0 • ( 3. S - .lb ) * .0097 «1000.0
- --- --— ---- - ---- --
21.53 * 20.0
3b.b«
CONCtNlHAl ION OF SU2 IN LBS/HH
S02HR = CSD2 • 10**(-5) * US
SU2HH s ,5V « I0*«(-b) •
.000 LHS/MH
-------
I- ItLU UA Irt
PLANl
LOCA1 ION
MUM StCUNUAHT HXIlAllSl
SAMPLE TTPE
OPtKATUH
AMHltNl ItMP.(UtG.F)
b«H.PRESS.(IH.HU)
MtfKN CAL1B. FACIDK
NtAl) K WtCUKU IIAIA EVEKY
SO.
b.U MlMJltS
KI/N NIIMHk»
HMUHt LEM,IH
tYPt
t I GLASS
SAMPLt HUX NUMHEK
MtTEK HIlX NIIMHbK
HKUbt *HtA ItK StI TING
>
to
U)TOTALS
"-UVtRAGE
SAMPLE.
1 iMt
(MIN.)
0
b.O
10.li
lb.0
au.o
30.0
30.0
CLUCK
TIMt
PI I IP K 1
1 L ul« " /
1800
180b
1610
101*}
1H
-------
!>UL»-UK UIDXIUE FIELD UA1A A KFSULt.S IAUULAIIUU
EPA MtlHlIU h
PLANT- NAME AND AUUKESS
ASAHCU
TEST PSO«J-3
NOQ SECONDARY tXHAUST
FES1 ItAM
SCHtFI-KL/ANIhSMtWbLK
ENGLISH UNITS
ro
TEST DATE
TB
TF
TT
Y
VM
TM
VMS TO
PB
00 VT
VTB
VSOLN
VA
OZ
OS
N
C802
TIME-START
TIME-FINISH
NEI TIME OF TEST, MIN.
MEIER CALIBRATION FACTOR
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT METEK CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
Al STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BAROMETK1C PRESSURE
VULUME UF BARIUM PERCHLURATE
TITkANT USEU FOR SAMPLE
VOLUME OF BARIUM PERCHLURATE
TIlkANl FOR THE BLANK
IUIAL VOLUME OF SOLUTION
FOR THE SULFUR DIOXIDE
VULUME UF SAMPLE ALIOUOI
UTkAlED
OXYGEN , PERCENT
FLOW NATE
NURMALIIV OF BARIUM
PtHCHLORATE TITkANT
CONCENTRATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE
URY BASIS, STNO. CONDITIONS
CUNCEMHAUON OF SOLFOR
OIOXIUE BY VOLOME
LHS (JF SULFOk niOXIDE
PEn HOOK
10UU
1B39
JO.U
CU-F T
HE Ik 1C UNI Ib
01/1
1HOO
13"
30.0
n. a F
«!9.3bU SLF
•j.8 ML
.Ib ML
1000. ML
t!0. ML
.0 X
.0 SCKH
.009/ MILLEUUIVALLMTS/ML
.66 * 10**(-5J LH/OSCF
«0.13 PPM
.OUO LHS/Hk
,«3/ LO-M
.031 5CM
MM-Hb
* 6H UEG F,
IN.HI,. ,UKY
-------
tXAMHLt SDLFUH UlUXlOt C ALUILA I lIHJb ItbT 'JtJ.HSUc?-J
NUM SECUNOAKr EXHAUbT
VULUMt Itf UWT (,A3 SAMHLIU AT SlANDAKU tUNl> 1 I IMnS
VMSTO = ll.bH? * VM * Y * (PH ) / (TM * UfrO.J
3U.r-h
VMSIO = —»- — ———- — ... --------------- = c?S.4bU USLK
( 71.2 + UhO.)
CONCtNlkAHUH UF- SU2 AT STANDARD CUNMIIIUNS
C302 = 7. Oh • 11MM-5) • N * (VT - VlbJ • VSOLiv / VA )/VMSIH
7.0«> • 10«*(-5) «.0097 • ( b.8« - ,lb) •10UO.O
CONCtNTHATUJN OF 3U2 BY VOLUME
.p 302PPM = 030. U • IVT - VtB) • N • VSOLN
, ----- ........ — . ----- . -----------
N) VMSTI) • VA
U)
*° Q3U.O • ( S.« - .15 ) • .0097 *1000.0
S02PPM = ------ — - — --.——-- --- -._...._-..-.-.--.--_ r
-------
MtLO DA I A
HI. AN I
LOCATION
ASAKCIJ
ND'I StCUNUAKY ^ XMAUJj t
SAMPLt lYPt
UPbHAF UH
AMHltNl IEMP. (l)tb.F)
HAk.HMtSb. UN. Hi;)
II A It
k|IN MJMHtW
HKUBk LtNlilH
TYPE
GLASS
bO.
SAMPLt BOX NUMbEH
Ml IEK 8DX
HklJHt
Mtlt'W
HtAU K NtCUHU IIAIA EVEHY
M[l4Uthb
> TOTALS
k AVERAGE
O
SAMPLE
1 IMt
IMN.)
0
b.O
10.0
lb.0
50.0
5b.O
55.0
CLOCK
TIME
^ 1 1 IP K 1
I.LUL R j
1645
iabo
Iflbb
1900
1900
1910
I;AS METEH
WEAD1NU
(CU.F 1 .)
bib. 190
bie.79b
b
-------
IJIUXJDK FIELD UAIA A HF.bliLtS lAbliLAIIUU
EPA Mt I HIIO b
PLANT- NAME AMU ADDRESS
ASARCU
TtSI TEAM LEADEH
SLHtFFEL/ANIKSMEHUEk
TEST
NU4 SECONDARY EXHAUST
K>
TEST DATE
ENUl1SH UNllb
(ll/11/He!
METKIC UNiib
U 1 / 1 <4/ttr>
TB
TF
TT
T
VM
TM
VMSTO
PB
VT
VTB
VSOLN
VA
08
QS
N
C$02
S02PPM
S02HR
TIME-START 184b IBdb
IIMfFlNlSH 1V|(J 1410
Ntl I1ME UF TEST, MIN. *b.O
-------
bULFUH MlJXlOE C ALUJL A I lt)l\iS ItSI MJ.PSU,?-«
NU<4 StCUNOAKY EXHAUSI
VOLUMt S) * US
,gb * IO**(-5) * .0 = . (MIU LHS/MW
-------
IK LI' DA I A
HLAM
bAMPLlrtG LOCATION
ASAKLU
HU» bLCONUANY EXHADbT
UAIE
NUMHEH
SAMPLE TYPE SOi;
UPEWAIUH AilItSBEKbtK
AMH1EN1 lEMP.(UEG.F) SU.
HAK.PHESb. UN.Hb) JU.«?b
METEh CALIB. FACItlH .^tt«
WEAO H HEtUKU OA1A EVEMY b.O MlNUlES
SAMPLE CLUCK bAS MtTtK DHY GAS METEN
I1ME TIME HEAOlKb IEMP
(MIN.) (24-HH (CU.hl.) tDEb.F)
IHLt 1
0 1985 633.U3c>
10.0 19ib 6ai.o;o 7a.
eO.O 19«b bMH.Mb »0.
TOTALS ^0.0 lb.t?B3
. AVERAGE >J.V
\
NJ
PWOBE LENI.1H /I TYPE
SAMPLE BOX NUMHEH
Mf- IE*< BOX NUMHtW
HHOHE 'MEAIEH SETTING
1MPINGEH
TEMP
(OEb.F)
60.
60.
bO.
•3 F I
Fb<*
«?bo.
PERCENT
OF
CONSTANT
O A Y C
HA 1 1
99.95
IVO.Cb
bLASS
U>
-------
SULHJH rmiXIDh MtLU OAfA K NlSIILTS IAHOLAI10U
tPA Ht IllOU *
PLANT- MAMt AND AUURESS TkSI TtAM LtAUtK
ASARCU AnltSblKGtk
TEST PSUd-5 IWH SECONDARY EXHAUST
TEST UAIt
tit
TF
TT
VM
TM
VMSTD
, VT
VTB
VSOLN
VA
oa
US
N
S02PP*
S02HR
TIME-START
TIMt-MNlSH
Ntt llMt OF 1EST, MIN.
MtTEK CALIBRATION FAC1UH
VULUMt UF DRY GAS SAMPLEU
A) MtltH CONUITIUNS
AVEHAGt GAS METFR TEMH
VOLUMt OF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BAHUMtTKIC PRESSURE
VULUMt OF BARIIIH PEHCHLORATE
T1TKAMT USED FOR SAMPLE
VOLUME UF BARIUM PCRCHLURATE
TIIKANT FUR THE BLANK
T01AL VULUME OF SOLUTION
FUR THE SULFUR DIOXIDE
VULUME OF SAMPLE ALIOUOl
TIIKATEU
UXYbEN , PERCENT
FLOW RATE
NORMALITY OF BARIUM
HfcWCHLONATE TI1RANT
CONttNTKAT ION UF SULFUR DIOXIDE
UKY HAS1S, STNO. CONDITIONS
LNbLlSM UNITS
01/1
IS2S
MtTRK UNITS
Ul / I t/Ot!
•?o.o
SULFUH
LUNLENTKAT1UN
l'10»lUt BY
LBS OF SULFUR OlOXlOt
HliUH
CU-F T
77.0 F
IS.015 SLF
30.£b IN-HG
S.O ML
.15 ML
IUOQ. ML
20. ML
.0 Z
.0 SCFH
.OU«»/ MILLEfJUlVALtNTS/ML
1.11 * IO*M-5) LH/USCF
67. it> fPM
.000 LHS/HK
LU-M
t
SCM
MM-Hb
6b Otb F,
IN. Mb. ,OKY HAS1S
-------
tXAMHLt bULFUK lllDXIUt C ALLI.'L A 1 I (INS IKS) Ivu .HS
N(ta StCUNDAWY EXHAUST
VOLUMt OK UNIT (.AS SAMPLhU AT SlAUUAKU COMilllONS
VMSTU = lJ.bO.J
|7.b<*7 • 15.2B3 * .90H • 30.^6
=
( 71.0 »
VMS10 =
USt^
OF SU£ AT 3TANDAHU
CSU^ = 7. Ob • 10*«(-S) * N * (VT > VlB) * VSOLN / VA J/VMSIU
7.06 • 10*o(-S) «.0097 • ( b.OO - .15) "1000.0 /
CSU2 =
= l.lob • 10«M-b) LB/USCF
N)
CONCEN1HAT1UN OF 508 HY VOLUMt
S02PHM s M30.0 • (VI - VTB) • N » V30LN
••••••«••••._.•«---—-.•-••—--.-•-
VMSTD • VA
030.0 • ( 5.0 - .15 ) • .0097 MOOO.O
— — - --- —
15. oe « ao.o
S02PPM =
f>7.36
CUNCtUlKAT ION OF SU8 IN LBS/HR
SUeHH = C30
-------
MtLU I)A FA
PLANI ASAXLU INC
SAMPLING LOCATION NU <« tXHAUSI
SAMPLE TYPE SU2
UPtWAIOK AMtSHEhULK
AMHlENT TEMP. (OEG.F) bU.
HAK.PHtSS.UN.HG) 3U.cfb
METEH CAL1B. FACTIlW .90(1
HtAf> A HECUHU OftlA EVEHY b . 0 MlNUU.b
SAMPLE CLOCK GAS MfcltH
TIME TIME HEADING
PI fir M t
ULUL* J
o eoab bae.»j5
b.U 2031 bb^.bUO
1U.U ?U3h bbb.l
bH. b4. 1UU.2U
bH. 54. 100.12
bM.U 54.
-------
SOLFUH UlUXIDt MELD UAfA 14 RESULIb I AhllL A I 1 UN
EF-A wit I HiMj h'
PLANT- NAME ANU AUURESS
A3ARCO I III,
TEST PSUii-b NO IK-HG
b.3 ML
i».is ML
IOUO. ML
•fO. ML
.0 X
.0 SCFH
,oo«»/ MILLEUUIVALENTS/ML
eo.o c
.biJM SCM
/btt.bU MM-HG
CONCENTRATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE
OHY bASIS, STND. CONDITIONS
CONCENIRATION OF SULFUR
U1UXIUE AY VOLUMt
LBS OF SULFUR DIOXIDE '
PER HOOK
.77 • 10««(-b) LH/USCF
1b.7<* PPM
.OUU LbS/HH
» bH l)tb F, ^9.9^ 1N.HG. fDRY BASIS
-------
tXAMPLt SULf-Ulv IllDXIOt CALLULAIlUNb Itbl No.HSllc'-b
MJ « tXHAIISt
VOLUME OH am GAS SAMPLCO AI sfAuOAKo UJNUI i IIM.S
VMS1U = 17.b17 • VM * Y • (MB ) / UM » UbO.J
I7.b47 • iH.Sia * .908 • iu.
-------
^ ItLU DA FA
PLAM
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE lYPt
OPEWA1UH
AMUIENI ItMP. (l)Eli.F
HAW.PHESS. 1 IN.Hi;)
METtH CALlb. FACIUH
HbAU A HtCOP.1) DATA
SAMPLE
11ME
IM1N.)
V
5.0
10.0
lb.0
20.0
ASAKCU/-I AtOMA, HASH
NU a tXMAObl
502
AN! tbbEKbth
) hO.
10.00
.4bO
EVEHY b.O M1NOIES
CLOCK bAS Mtltt* OKY GAS 'MtltW
TIME KEAUlUb ItUP
(Zfl-HH ICU.FT.) lOtti.F)
IbOb 820. 1VU
Ibll 820. IbO brf.
151b 82n.lbC be!.
1521 »3f?.lbO bu.
Ibiife Hib.lbO b(<.
1)4 It 01/20
WUN NOMBtH PbH«?-
PHOHt LfcNbIM ft TYPt b FT
SAMPLE HOX NOMHEH
MtlKK BOH NIIMHtH Fbb
P'^O'it 'HI-AIFK StITlNb i-bO.
IMPlNbKW PERCENT
TEMP OF
(UEb.F) CUNbTANI
It A 1 t
K ^ 1 C
bO. 99.19
bO. 100. IV
bt. 100.19
53. 100.14
U* TOTALS
J. AVERAGE
ao.o
ia.o
bl.
VD
-------
SULFUR OIUXlDfc FH.LO DAI* ft WtSULIb I A MllL A I I UN
EM A MhlHUI) t>
PLANT- NAME ANO AUURESS
ASARCU/-TACUMA, NASH
TEST Psoa-7 NO a EXHAUST
Itbl UAM
ANItShtHGtk
TEST UATE
tB
TF
TT
T
VN
TM
"VMS TD
_
U1 PB
O
VT
VTB
V80LN
VA
OZ
08
N
CT02
8U2PPM
802HR
IIME-START
NET TIME OF TEST, M1N.
MtTER CALIBRATION FACTOR
VOLUME UF DRY GAS SAMPLED
A1 METER CONDITIONS
AVERAGE GAS METER TEMP
VOLUME UF DRY GAS SAMPLED
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS*
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
VOLUME OF BARIUM PERCHLUHATE
TITRANT USED FOR SAMPLE
VOLUME UF BARIUM PERCHLURATE
T1THANT FOR THE BLANK
TOTAL VULUME OF SOLUTION
FUR THE SULFUR UIOXIOE
VOLUME OF SAMPLE ALIQUOT
I 1 (HATED
UXYGtN , PERCENT
FLOW RATE
NORMALITY UF BARIUM
PEHCHLUrtATE TITRANT
CONCENTRATION OF SULFUR UIOXIOE
DRY HAS13, STNO. CONDI THINS
CONCENTRATION UF SULFUR
BY VULUMK
ENGLISH UNITS
01/<»0/»e;
1506
.0
.960
15.970 CU-FT
bfl.O F
15.791 SLF
30.00 1N-HI,
.3 ML
.20 ML
1000. ML
2v. ML
ME1KIC
01
1*06
.VhO
CO-M
M.i C
.447 SCM
76
-------
tXAMPLt SULFUK DIOXIDE L ALCUL A I U'Nb IEM MU.KSUe'-/
NU 4 EXHAUST
VOLUME (It- OKY GAS SAMPLED AT SIAUUAhU tUNUIHONS
VMSIU * 17.6*7 • VM • Y • (PB ) / (IM + 460.)
17.647 * 15.970 • .9bU * 30.00
.—— — - — ------ .. ---------------- .- =
( 5«.0 » *b\>.)
VM3TO
UStF
CONCEN1HA! ION OF 308 AT STANOAHO CUNU1TIUNS
CS02 = 7.06 * IO*»(-5) * N • (VT - VIH) • VSULN / VA I/VMSIO
7.C6 • IO««(-5) «,0097 • I ,3«! - .?0) *1000.0
-------
END OF PKOtiHAH
tCOJ
CPU SEC. = 11. tLAPSEU WIN. r 1. FMI, KEB 11, l<»«3, 3: Jb
>
NJ
ro
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA
B-l
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULARJIUCTS
Plant
Date
lilt*
Sampling location
Inside of far wall
of nipple
Inside of near wall to outsijd
nipple (nipple length)
Stack I.D.
of
Nearest upstream disturbance
Nearest downstream disturbance
Calculated by
dd
dd
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
DUMBER
/
Si
A
3-
V
S~
{*>
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
,w
,/rt'
,2%,
•?^y
ihfy
.$&
STACK I.D.
Co
I
PRODUCT OF
COLWNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/1 INCH)
NIPPLE
LENGTH
;z£
\
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
FROM OUTSIDE OF RIPPLE
(SMOFCOUMNSUS)
5#
//#
UK
W*
&9
<&¥f
B-2
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
*« 17
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
(»F)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
2.
II
II
33
MOLECULAR
WT.
.*-.&. 1.3
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
51 AM OR SIDE 1
, t.^tL^
SIDE 2
• . • . •
PITOT
TUBE Cp
.'.V
MOISTURE
%
JJ*.
73
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
L- 1
2.
,3
v
^47"
f.
h i
b
3
• f
'
£
POSITION
(in.)
11 .12 .13«U
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.H.,0
s ^
25.26*2? , 21 .29
/• */
/• *
I. X
/ 2L
A /
/'/
/ T
/ 4^
''t
j.3~
/. ?
STACK
TEMP, »F
31.39.40.41
i >
L/»
<^t
cv
.^ /
<~7
1
ft
5*
&•
jf^
^r
fT-
~>
B-3
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
A
37
CAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
/r/7
»»
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AKB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. R20)
2.
II
Ji
II
MOLECULAR
¥T.
. X«J3
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
HAM OR SIDE 1
. 4. z>. » . .
SIDE 2
• . • . i
PITOT
TUBE Cp
.^y
MOISTURE
t
,/.»,
40
44 31
«l
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7,1.9 .10
J3 1
4
^9
«/
>
&
<- /
J
1
~&
Y
(
POSITION
(in.)
11 .1 7 ,)3»U
VELOCITY
HEAD
(ips) , in.H20
J 5. ?6 • 77 . 78 ,29
/ /
f'fs
/'Z
/••fr
'-Y
/, /
I.I
l'\
STACK
TEMP, «F
31 ,3 9 .40 .41
^7
r-f
£r
-------
CAS VELOCITY MID VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
94 »7
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
2
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
(»F)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
MOLECULAR
WT.
.^M.3
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
5IAM OK SIDE 1
. 4 '.* . .
SIDE 2
PITOT
TUBE Cp
.et
MOISTURE
%
M
40
44 51 41 44 47
73 76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
<*^ /
X
J
r^
*T7
<7
*r?
*-j
'*%
-f?
r^
Cl
J7
-
B-5
0
T, --
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
14 97
SAMPLING LOCATION
st
CLOCK
TIME
»6 •»
RUN
NUMBER
f - ?
OPERATOR
X/c^/
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
. ,M
44
• I
*7
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7,1.9 .10
> 1
*
3
Y
f
I
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
fi/:f
34 37
CLOCK
TIME
»»
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
(»F)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Kg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
2.
I/- |
II
31
3*
MOLECULAR
WT.
. A'.IJ
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
5IAM OR SIDE 1
.6.O.D. .
SIDE 2
t . • . t
PITOT
TUBE Cp
.«y
MOISTURE
%
./J).
44
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
M-
±
±
POSITION
(in.)
VELOCITY
HEAD
7 5.26 «37 , 2« .79
STACK
TEMP, «F
31.19 .40 .41
.-r?
B-7
-------
CAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUME DATA
1.
2.
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
>4
SAMPLING LOCATION
41
RON
NUMBER
±
CLOCK
TINE
4>4> 49
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
(»F)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
II
31
MOLECULAR
WT.
.^.
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
)IAM OH SIDE 1
. 4 o.o.
SIDE 2
. . • . i
PITOT
TUBE Cp
^^V
MOISTURE
.LO.
*'
70
73
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
I...* 1 .9 .10
POSITION
(in.)
VELOCITY
HEAD
23.26.27.28 .29
STACK
TEMP, »P
II. 39.40 .41
6,6
B-8
r - rt
-------
CAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
17
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
RON
NUMBER
OPERATO
AMB. TEMP.
CD
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
I/-/?"
II
MOLECULAR
HT.
STfjc?
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
MAM OR SIDE 1
/ /—>
. £7.C?« ; . —
SIDE 1
-^
. , • A _^x
PITOT
TUBE Cp
• .
MOISTURE
%
,/K
40
• I
70
if,
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
/!-/
Z
*>
f-
•$
. ta
t>- (
z
^
4
If
POSITION
(in.)
1 .1 2 ,U«I4
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.HjO
7 5.76 • 7 7 , 71 . 7«
//^^
y.-^f
/.&*>
't^
/.2&
j. GO
A &P
/.**?
/t*lo
/"&0
/, "+0
X, 3^>
STACK
TEMP, »F
31 •) 9 .40 ,41
<£4o
*lt>
-------
GAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
14 97
CAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
42
46
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATO
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
(A/*
II
II
II
MOLECULAR
HT.
.-&#&.
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
51 AM OH SIDE 1
SIDE 2
__
--•—•— » .' ,*^<
PITOT
TUBE Cp
MOISTURE
%
.AC?
40
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
k~y
•?
^
4
*,
if
CL~ i
Z
^
Jt
]**
c.
POSITION
(in.)
1 1 .1 3 .1 J«I4
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.HjO
? i. ?6 • 77 . )l ,29
/tt-&
/.^O
J,<0
S,?~0
f>.*c>
/'Z-o
/. /&
/i +4
/.t*>
'/,*
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
i.
i/l/l 44
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
•6
49
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Kg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HjO)
2.
11
31
15
MOLECULAR
KT.
.a^r^.o
SIDE 2
-: . . .-*>
PITOT
TUBE Cp
. .
MOISTURE
.A*
Jl
64
73
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
SL-I
7
5
*
<
I,
^ - i
7
%
4
4.
if
POSITION
(in.)
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Apg) , in.HjO
? 5. J6 «?7 , 28 ,29
//zc?
y.-fe?
/f*o
/*2>-o
A ^0
/. xo
// Z^
/.4-t>
/,f°
/, a^fy
/.**&
X ?rO
STACK
TEMP, »F
31 .19.40 .41
<££
^^
^7
^?
<2,
&<*
^~6>
•£ U
-
(s -.
B-ll
-------
CAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
14
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
46
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AHB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. R20)
2.
II
11
is
it
MOLECULAR
MT.
.?^
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
MAM OR SIDE 1
.&£>* ~. .
SIDE 2
— T->
PITOT
TUBE Cp
• .
MOISTURE
%
./P.
40
** it
«1
70
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
*'L
t
3
4
f
&
-/I-/
£
4
V-
4
t*
POSITION
(in.)
M .1 3 ,I3«U
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.HjO
? 5> 26 • 7 7 , 21 i 29
A 10
/,*/*>
/,-&£>
S*&-0
/14*°
/,1*y
/tiff
J.40
/.l^
/i &0
/. f£
// t
<7
^ >
5-^
-
B-12
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
a* »7
CAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
*6
RUN
NUMBER
OPERSfb
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Kg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
2.
33 31
MOLECULAR
¥T.
^4rc?
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
51 AM OR SIDE 1
./£?.£&£? .—
SIDE 2
•^^j^™ ™ • * • J
PITOT
TUBE Cp
• .
MOISTURE
%
.#?.
40
70 73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
/>-!
1
?
+
*.
U
fc>*/
z
5
*
>
If
POSITION
(in.)
VELOCITY
HEAD
Ups) , in.H20
2S_i24 «?7 j J»_J»
/,**>
s*to
J.4^
/,4o
/.
/. Z«L
S.2.<
'S.4-*,
/f ^o
/.40
/.4-*
/.*>£>
STACK
TEMP, "F
1» .19 .40 .41
&^
*;/-
f*f
>
o
5"^-
5"i
<<^>
-r?
-5^
•^>
•£•*
-
B-13
-------
CM VELOCITY AMD VOLUHE DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
7?
>4 97
SAMPLING LOCATION
&
CLOCK
TIME
66
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
(*F)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Kg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
'3.o
31
M
31
35
MOLECULAR
KT.
..?:*. 7.3
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
31 AM OH SIDE 1
. £ P. 0. .
SIDE 2
• . • • i
PITOT
TUBE Cp
-./&*
MOISTURE
%
,^,
40
70
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7,1.9 .10
-} /
Ati
*
-------
GAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
,/U/fl
14 17 40
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TINE
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
(»F)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Kg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
Jl
MOLECULAR
WT.
.^??.7.3
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
JIAM OR SIDE 1
. £o. D. .
SIDE 2
i . • , •
PITOT
TUBE Cp
Jl
MOISTURE
%
./.4
40
** it
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
/
2.
3
r.
3
I
/
J,
~3
y.
5
L,
POSITION
(in.)
11 i!7 .13*14
I
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Apg) , in.HjO
J 5.26 • 77 . 21 .2*
a. 9
/. 1
/ 3
7,3
/- ^
V. V
/./
jj'*:
^
AT
Ay
f'T
B.I
STACK
TEMP, »F
31 .1 9 .40 .41
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
SAMPLING LOCATION
. *
CLOCK
TIME
34 37
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TBMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
2.
?
.ECU
>l
31
35 31
MOLECULAR
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
HAM OR SIDE 1
SIDE 2
PITOT
TUBE Cp
MOISTURE
./J).
40
44 47
73 76
FIELD DATA
B-16
- 9s;//*
-------
CAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUHE 8*TA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
/*S4#€C? -
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
>4
7
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Kg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
2.
' *-
-•9.4-
II
MOLECULAR
WT.
. 7fo?
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
)IAM OH SIDE 1
. <£.0. -r-r"
SIDE 2
• — -J
-. . . . 7
PITOT
TUBE Cp
•
MOISTURE
%
JP.
»»
73 76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
/r /
?
j
71
'?
^
r>-^
**
•?
*
^
POSITION
(in.)
11.12 ,13*U
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Apg) . in.HjO
75. 26.77, ?D ,29
"2 ffo
^
* )o
«'ft«
"^/*/<»
-1' ^°
4i
"3, (e>o
STACK
TEMP, »F
»,39 .40 .41
$/
•$3
^•^
^<
•55"
££
<^_
^?«>
^*-
j^5
^<
«
-
&
B-17
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
Stf
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Kg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
J3
MOLECULAR
W.
.Z.<7.£?
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
51 AM OR SIDE 1
.^.o.— — -
SIDE 2
. i • i i
PITOT
TUBE Cp
. m
MOISTURE
t
./*.
«1
73 76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
k- /
2
**
t+
•5
t>
f- /
7
-*>
4
5
L,
POSITION
(in.)
11 .U.13.U
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.H20
75.26.77. J» .29
•2 -**0
^.^0
4-,*uO
4<*O
4<0
*.,"K.O
3, /o
^/y/o
?,«0
Z.<&0
^Xfo
3, oo
STACK
TEMP, »F
31.19.40 .41
-?7
ss
f*
s
ss
•<£.
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
/A/Are.*/
37 49
SAMPLING LOCATION
ir
CLOCK
TIME
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
PERA
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hy)
STATIC PRESS
(in. R20)
2.
7 TT
31
31
MOLECULAR
WT.
7 4 &
.^- . '• i
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
5IAM OR SIDE 1
/ _.
. ^r^. . .
SIDE 2
>^
. . . . <**
PITOT
TUBE Cp
• .
MOISTURE
%
/0
. AK i
40
• I
73
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
X-'/
7
1
q
«c
'L,
h^l
1
*
•f-
f
*
POSITION
(in.)
n .13 •11*14
1
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Aps) , in.HjO
J 5. 56 • ?7 , ?i j J»
^/^e>
^,oto
*,
^xO-O
«f5<7
4-Jo
*>rfo
^••Z-cs
•*.-*. o
STACK
TEMP, »F
31 .1 * .40 .41
«»
-------
OAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
40
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
49
RUN
NUMBER
OP
PERATO
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. B20)
2.
11
31
IS
MOLECULAR
HT.
?4&.
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
HAM OR SIDE 1
. £?<=>. ' . .
SIDE 2
-r-^^>
PITOT
TUBE Cp
• .
MOISTURE
%
. L*>.
40
70
73
76
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.1.9 .10
7
^
4-
£-,
co
"3X_3O
STACK
TEMP, -F
31.39.40 .41
^2-
^^
^(^^2^^
.^ ^i
^5,
<-^
•S "2-
^. ^
•S-i-
^4-
^.^
s^-
»
-------
CAS VELOCITY AMD VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
34 37
43
•6 »9
RON
NUMBER
-r-
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
RAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
SI
II
MOLECULAR
in.
2-4.0
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
>IAM OR SIDE 1
. b& . . .
SIDE 2
- — ^
. . • . S^
PITOT
TUBE Cp
• .
MOISTURE
%
v.e
40
41
47 70 73 76
FIELD DATA
X, 10
f, * Mtt
B-21
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
1.
>4 »'
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
2
•* *»
RON
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
(»F)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
-1*0
15
MOLECULAR
WT.
./17>
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
>IAN OR SIDE 1
.£?. . .
SIDE 2
i . • i •
PITOT
TUBE Cp
./;
-------
PARTICUALTE/ARS ENIC
B-23
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
AMI I Cltl
lEzmEDaj nDQED BOO; 00300033(33)
il I I I M I I I I
OrtMIM
HUM
SIAU IHIM
OINU. (HEMS)
riioi
IUU
ThIM
r«tc
•WOT
vsuxriTV
(Mince PMCSSUM
oirrtUMTiAi.
UNI.ln.HjOI
•TACC
flNTCMTUM
M* CAS NCTM
TtNPCHATURC
NET
OUTLET
IT »•«»
out
VACUUM.
MMTL* Ml
INTI
•r
.1*1
**
74
"7 o
V.o
10
«J
I.V7
10
#r
&
*£>
i.i-»
\ .37
jLmC
121T
±
717-0
«
"f-O
7525-
^
7+
7 o
^
A7J
Jl^.
+-JP
7;
l
<*•/]
TC
&JD
-------
PARTICULATE/ARSENIC TRAIN SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant ASfTRCjQ
Sample date I-JS-&3
Sample location N» 4 Set^A
Run No. Pf(TC - ]
Recovery date /-
Recovered by
Particulate filter No. OOO25QT ^articulate filter sample I.D.
MO.STUKE
1st
impinger
Final wt t>6 g
Initial wt A5b g
Net wt "^0 g
2nd
impinger
X/7 g
A5o g
31 g
Total
3rd
impinger
£&P g
Zoo g
2ft g
moisture
4th 5th
impinger impinger Silica gel
31 trf
2oO
7
&7.L
g /V
g iloo
g "^
_ g
_ 9 „
g j
g .
W
fffog
3nn g
/T.i g
% spent
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Acetone probe rinse
container I.D.
r>
0.1 N NaOH probe rinse
container I.D. 066 / H
H«0 impinger
container I.D.
HpO^ impinger
container I.D.
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Blank containers I.D.
Acetone
-
ft
0.1 N NaOH J5£9"7ft
H2°2
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by
Remarks
Date
B-25
-------
EMISSION TESTING FLELD DATA
•FfMItt
lit*
rn
MUM.
iUIIC
MIU.
(I* «,OI
flltll MMIM(S)
lt«tl IHIH
OIN».
NtOTllMMl
•*.&» I _ I
tus.
VkSm i/l
MQUll.
yum Utu MIII I *m CM
!wi M.IMU MiJ * H 0 I »*»«• *
CMCK
K
F«CTO«
c
m
I wi
«t MAT *o
•icaw
-------
PARTICULATE/ARSENIC TRAIN SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant A
WRCLO
Sample location Ho T sSetanJarv CxMaoTT'
Run No. PA
Particulate
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
Wl-/
filter No.<
1st
impinger
//«5 9
/So 9
-^5 9
/
Sample di
Recovery
Recovere<
DooiWo / Particulate filter
2nd
Impinger
y?3 g
/5V3 9
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
• tut
'$m
1
0»H
WMHIW IOCAIIM
SMKI tm
"" -- -,- ^ - - -- -1 -
I t I I 1 I I I I I
1 1
-i
. t -^
in*
•M. SIM 1C
fttss. w»».
(I*. Nf»l (li. N.Q)|
fllHi
•IS)
irnci IWIH
OINU. IIKMS)
fllOl IMtM
IIM I HA.
fMf
0QQuu D u u HB IE Ij DID CD [DID I
i..- .-!•«:. .••. ;
,"--'••*.:'•*.;•••.•:••i. ••';•;"::, t
L{ • ' i ** '*. i II
•' -
MIIU. I y. ^.Liii I MIIJ I «««•«*-
I «. i m [MI M.INI wJ • N 0 | Mew
M.I IU«CKC« 1 I f
f fiiTntlcw '««"•
w»iCfijffl
P-'^m--.*^' "/>
^;::^ L^.-.C^
oniricc rwssuM
DirrCUMTIAk
^ •'•-.
-------
ISI
ESI
t CITI
O..I
MIVIIW IOU1ION
I
wmi tm
IM. I SUIIC
nut.
CM (IN. HI) (I*. ",0)
il«£I IMIH
OINU. (IKNfS)
DirrCUHTIAL
-------
Plant
PARTICULATE/ARSENIC TRAIN SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
_ Sample date
Sample location M»
^^
Run No. PftTL-
Recovery date
Recovered by
Parti cul ate filter No.Ooo25o% ^Particulate filter sampl e lo '(/ft L ?-
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
1st
impinger
SQO 9
9
g
/5o
2nd
impinger
9
9
g
MOISTURE
3rd
impinger
/56
llo
g
g
g
Total moisture
'
-------
. . . A • .
fni. NJD. ywrti IWTU win
•T I ill !«M MO.IMI wo\ • N t
W3i
tfA/A I I i
IfHOIll i 17133H
5>l53 I 14
-------
PARTICULATE/ARSENIC TRAIN SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant flSftTo Sample date
Sample location /^6 V ^w^g^^-Jary fxAwsTRecovery date
Run No. /VfcsA- ~L^ Recovered by
Particulate filter No. QQ&2S"b* S Parti cul ate filter sample
MOISTURE
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
impinger implnger Impinger Impinger 1mp1nger Silica gel
Final wt /£7 g /&/ g ff£ g X77 g ftf g
Initial wt /5o g /5o g ZQO g 2oZ> g Zx>o g
Net wt -/g^ g Y g - r fo)g -3 fp)g -^ (o) g
Total moisture yV g 3D % spent
RECOVERED SAMPLE
L1c
container I.D. f673--£ ^ marked
Acetone probe rinse ^M ._ ^ Liquid level s
0.1 N NaOH probe rinse Liquid level
container I.D. *>&?% ' rr " marked
H20 impinger Liquid level
container I.D. j^7T"^r ^ marked ^
HpOp impinger Liquid level
container I.D. <*£>7r~Sr ^ marked
Blank containers I.D. Liquid level
Acetone 4-Zoon marked
~~ Liquid level
0.1 N NaOH c569"7/y ^ marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
H20£ Qky£ n S marked
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by ^—££^2t,-c^ ^^'^i^t^ Date
Remarks
(/
B-32
-------
SMI 1C
Mti
»• XVfS-W—
$&&?.-••''
omricc rncssuM
OirrCMHTlAl.
Mf CAS NCTKB
TtMPMATUU
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
t cn»
Mil
1
UNHIK lOUtlM
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i i i i i
I I
I I I I I I I I I
1
I I I I I I I I I I I I
-------
! .„...,.-„. ....
PARTICULATE/ARSENIC TRAIN SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant fefVRCO Sample date /- Z ? -
Recovery da
Recovered
Sample location
Run No.
Particulate filter No. 353o44J ^Particulate filter sample" j^fr
MOISTURE
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
1st
impinger
//z. g
™
/5e> g
-3t g
2nd
impinger
/^g
r
/So g
/# g
Total
3rd
impinger
^^ g
2oo g
?- g
moisture
4th
impinger
/^f 9
•zoo g
-1 a
^7 T '3> 9
5th
Impinger
//? g
Zr>o g
- 3 g -
?^
Silica gel
^^•3 g
3oo g
r % spent
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Acetone probe rinse n\a-i A
container I.D. T'"7 rf
0.1 N NaOH probe rinse
container I.D.
H20 impinger
container I.D.
HpO^ impinger
container I.D.
4/99 fi
Blank containers I.D.
Acetone
0.1 N NaOH
H2°2
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by
Remarks
Date
B-35
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
ftttt t CITf
Mil
UNMIM I0t*tION
im
.... . -
1111 11 i 11 i 11
lit.
H-D.
«fl. it) I
I MH1 I «IU1M
m.oi to «n» r«ctai >
CMC!
cni
R C
FACTOR I MCtM
Ul
HUM
VSUKITff
ffttSSUM
-------
PARTICULATE/ARSENIC TRAIN SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
o Sample date /-
Plant
Sample location Mo 4 C
Run No.
Recovery date
Recovered b
Particulate filter No.353(Wlfc> ^articulate filter sample^D.
MOISTURE
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
1st
impinger
/V?-g
/5b g
-J g
2nd
impinger
/£z_g
/so g
2-g
3rd
impingi
;>06.L*
3oo g
<5.l> g
^ % spent
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Acetone probe rinse
container I.D.
0.1 N NaOH probe rinse
container I.D.
impinger
container I.D.
HpOp impinger
container I.D.
Blank containers I.D.
Acetone
0.1 N NaOH
H20
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
A-
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
7
Received by
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Date
B-37
-------
P.S.D. BLOWING
B-38
-------
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
VtMtOI
M. MM.
TO
1IMIC
(I*.
IMTACTOR TTfC
$!«• IMIH
•MM. |UMt|
^
I A I I 1 I
MIKI. I tUt. IWWUlMflt
i.r i «•• li» !m wltoi••] • N •
oniricc rwssu
oirrtWHTiM,
Mf CAS MCTta
TtMKIIATUU
-------
ANDERSEN IHPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location
Run number
Sample date
Recovery date ///?/g5
Recovered by A(cP
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse
container number _
Acetone blank
container number _
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Filter number <•'•
S
510
53
Container sealed
jine
'/
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by
Remarks
Date
/
B-41
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
VtMtOi
|*rt
Mill.
MM If
1HPHCTW TTK
mm
««« I MM
nEiifflffl
*
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location /fa .
Run number
*5eto«<)*r
Sample date
Recovery date
Recovered by
RECOVERED SAMPLE
4-iSlfr
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container number
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked t
Filter number
Container sealed
s377g-
377
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
flMt • CITI
urn nit IOUIIM
tm
" " " - :*- >
yf-trftft-i i i i i i i i i i i
SIM It
ffl
, 1 .
. .
ifi/o.
•OlliU
.1 M. iMlMiUtll I Mill I -MM«* |_J
m. i it> !JQI M>IHI wJ • m I Mcwi "ET
«««««
MM ui »t in
i •
S
OMiricc russuM
irrcMMTiAt
UMI.In.N.OI
Mf CAS MCTKB
TCNrtMTUMC
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant //JCp /QJ^ _ Sample date
Sample location ^. T ^cowc/afi/ <£>/?.au}T Recovery date
Run number p£x£> ~O Recovered by _
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse //tfzA- Liquid level /
container number T/o^n -' marked '
Acetone blank . Liquid level
container number ^rloo $ t marked /
Filters
Stage Filter number " ': Container sealed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup i/?-35$ : , " •'/'.'" /
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
V /' . /\x;/ .- '
Received by \-ts- ,L< *.-•• ••-^-/ Va-fi.,. Date
•; >yr ^ fC-/'/
T7
Remarks / •; >yr ^ fC-/'/
B-45
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
1MI I Cltt
33
&E
Mil
»|n|u|.JM|M|oJ..
VMfllW lOUttION
tm
1 17?h|iH»|n
MlKllt
BHBri
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
I 1 » 1 I I 1 I I
•".0. |VM»||IWIII
III !lOI MINIM
Will
t N t
Mtll CM
»«CIOt T
IOU CMC*
cm
c
MCVM
•At Ml
MAI U1
H.V
•f
•fUM
.1*
I I I
I I
'I*1!**!**
L.
' »
MIA
A I I
' ' *
I I
oniricc russuu
DirrCUHTIAL
CONDEN8ER
TCMPEKATURK
•r
-------
HMI t en?
Mil
VMMIK IOUMM
tm
~ • " ----------_^4|
111
J3P
VIMtOI
rn
run
n 01
IMPWTOM TYPE
M«CI IHIH
DIMM.
IMM
C»
TMW
7^^l *«|«>|M|tt
iEE
i i
LJ_LJ_i_l_L_U_l
i I i I A i i I 4/TV1 i
IIMTM MB tiff
•int.
.O. |MI»II'WTU * win
t) !HI HO.IMI n. » H •
•Mi.
JLL
WMI CM
r«cioi t
• llMUt Ul «l
CKCi
JM. M(
J-L
I I I I
MM W H.V I1
MAI UflHUI Mil •» I
UJ U D 010 (C Q CD Q UJCD CD C
I I A I I I A I A I I
ym»Tio
»V<70|?» I 13173134
5>iS3l»4
17
•OIOT
TI
vtLocin
I
OBiricc russuM
oirrcMMTiAt
UNI.In.NjO)
•TACK
tlfWCMTU
OUff CAS NCTEB
IT l.»r
OUTLET
IT. | .•»
"owt
IMP ACTOR
TBMPBKATUHS
•P
CONDENSER
TCHPERATUKe
•r
±L
±
f
f
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location /K> T v5eco*/c/a.ri/
Run number ^~^"
Sample date /
Recovery date _
Recovered by
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container number
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 .
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Filter nu
mbe
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Container sealed
- .1 '/ / '•
ner
X
Received by
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
• '^--^ L / c T.' Date
<; ^ /?f
B-48
-------
P.S.D. SKIMMING
B-49
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
VCLOCITt
•CAD
(A* ).!•.•,€>
CONDENSER
TCKPEKATUKE
•r
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
WtMtOI
1*0
•M. IUIIC
MISS. ram
(II N9|l IMIM
Mill
• N •
Mill CM.
ratioa ?
IUU CNtCK
IM.
era
MCTOI
c
MCI
•«! tit
MAI Ml
.
•i
MU
HIM
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
AIM
I I 1
I I I I
A 1 1
A 1 1 1
11
A I M I M I I A
1 1 A
' 'A 1 A I I
I
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant H5ftKCO /OCQ^Q^ Sample date
Sample location Ho. 4 5fiona)c.ry E'yhauJt' Recovery date
Run number /^-SJ^f-yC ~ / Recovered by
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse Liquid level /
rnntainpr numhpr V/7'T/?' -- imrkpri /
Acetone blank ^ ^ Liquid level
container number "7^>o H » marked
Filters
Stage Filter number " ' ' Container sealed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6 .*.
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by V A.
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION
MMT • cut
Mil
IOUIIOM
Tiff
MllllM
•HMIM
Ml SI.
II". N|1
iMTIC
Mill
(I". «,(
IMPACTOM TTPt
M«tl IHIH
DIMM.
mot
IMI
[•EH
It >• •
n[iHn|»
I I I I I I I I I
I wi
MTU
• N •
Will Ul
Ik.
I UK CHICK
R
r*cT«t
r«ci«
HUT UT
HUf Ml
•f
•IUM*
MU
>*>
>• '*[N
I I i I I I I I I I i
I ' »
J_L
A I I
' '
» ' A
otiricc VKCSSUM
DirrCUMTIAL
CONDENSER
TEMPERATURE
•r
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location //c
Sample date _/
7W83
Run number /?J> 55 "
£xh*us1' Recovery date
Recovered by
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container number
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Liquid level
marked
y-Zo
Liquid level
marked
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Filter number
Container sealed
X
X
Received by __-.
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Date
y
B-54
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
AMI • tilt
Mil
IOUIIOM
vmt im
. i. i
MtMIOI
m
MIM.
II". HQ
SHI 1C
MtSt
(•• |^0)
IMPACTOR TYPE
HKI IHIH
• MM.
mot
IUW
c»
TWW
301
Hill II M
fidk
. . . .
All
7ST777M17
MB im
Mtttt.
CM.
lUKCMICI
cm
iptp
•
racm
c
raciw
•Ul Ml
MAI HI
Mr.
•r
•u
Mill III
•lU*l«t btlil
t»[tr[n|n
>t|ii|rt|n
1 I I I I I I I I
i/i&t
JJL
' ' '
I I I I A
9M9H9
imolll i »|i3|74
47f43M4|45|4IS>IS4
VUVKMW
CMC* TIM
UMCX. (>« fcr
VELOCITY
oviricc russuM
OirrtUHTIAL
STACK
tIH»CIWTWMI
OUT CAS MCTKM
TrNPCHATUU
OUTLET
ewt
IPO> ACTOR
TCHPCKATUIIB
•T
CONDENSER
TEMPERATURE
•P
mz
V7
w
1
»•
.If
^?
^
>-^
Sb
.
io.
/-(.I
60
Zr.F
xJi
4
&*
5
m
m
23.
2
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location
Run number
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container.number
Filters
V
Sample date _
Recovery date
Recovered by _
/Z-V&3
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Filter number
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Container sealed
.-; /
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by
Remarks •'-;.
x
( J
Date
B-56
-------
tlttl I tltf
i i i i i i i i i i i i t i i i i i i i i i i i i
Mil
VMVllW IOUI ION
mnn
•ffMIOI
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
u •»
IllH It
MIM.
(IN. H,(
aWTi-B
SIM 1C
MIH
(!• it 0)
IWACTOK TYPE
I I I I I I I
IMIM
•!«•. (IKMt)
I I 1 I I A I I I A/lXI I I
mot
tMI
c»
33U
TMI
•En
EG
Mini.
M. JMIPtlUtnl
III 'lOI MO I Ml M> I
MIPtltn Mill
'lOI MO I Ml M> I «Ht
Ut. I i
f [n
iUKCKC
cr)|
](ZIJSQ!S Q1D !D C S 0) X DO CD 0) CD 23 ID O IS 00 D S3 Q CE 0 CD C
k
i i i i i i i i i I A/cft/i \ i i
jse^/£~^
y|tl tlio nln 1131 M
!9|roT>»T»l3aTi4
30|3I
3»n»|40|4l
5tlsaiS4
aalsal >f
TIM
JNCV. l>« kr
VELOCITY
ociricc russu
OirrCKENTIAk
UNI.lfl.NjOI
•TACI
OH* CAS NCTta
TSDfT-
IIT i.-r
VACUUM.
OUTUT
INPACTOM
TBMPCKATUn
•r
CONDENSER
TetfPCMTUME
•r
J
•^
^
Zf
IIZH
1*3-10
rt,
4177A&B RUN. NO.
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location //n
Run number
Sample date IH1
Recovery date |-/fl-
Recovered by /H\(jP
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle
container number
Acetone blank
container number
Filters Pr<
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
67.r
Liquid level X
marked /
Liquid level
marked
Filter number ._.
Container sealed
/
/
/
X
X
Backup
^•filter
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
OOOOOO5 •
Received by
Remarks -c.v. '/; -/C /^
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Date
B-58
-------
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
CHARGING
B-59
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
HAM • Cltl
lOCAIIM
im
.MrGo^A
..................
I I
OTH;
VtMIOI
rn
(I*. H,|
SUIIC
MISS
(II M 01
IMPACTOK TTPt
SIACI IMIH
DIMM. (IKMt)
MIDI
tUM
C»
tilMln
I I I i
1 I
«• tm
•mi.
ill !m
iwiu
• M •
Mill Ui
>«cr« *
ItM CMCI
c
MCI*
ttt
•At Ml
•If.
•fi
Ml*
okl
i t i . i i
JLL
tilt M
I I I A
J_L
I I I I A
i i
' '
I I
I I
7.81*6113171171 30|3lp7|33|J<|35i3^33
57153 184
STACK
TKMTCMTV
OMiricc
OirriUHTIAL
our CAS NCTKB
TTNPCHATOW
TSttif
CONDENSER
TCMPEKATUME
•r
IMPACTOK
TEMPEHATUW
•r
UMI.ln.N.OI
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
/J5fl%CjQ
Sample date f-
Sample location fjn V ^)e.cz»jJa r / £xh<\usf' Recovery date > - ^ "
Run number /l$ A\C.Jf-'jL "/ __
Recovered by
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container number
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Filter number
66-
pooooS^
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Container sealed
C '"/'•t'i t'
.': .-'-I''- '
x,
X
Received by
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Date >-'>*• '/.'•:. u
B-61
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
HMf • tltt
«|»|»|'I>l»|»»|»ihi|<>I"|lMt*lul'lll*P*l/lI;'l"lMll*l'»l'M'llMlMI>ll»'l»
•Aa*^ i •_!* iJ—*—J»»^i •• • luift.iJ I.I. i* * 1 I i • • i fc.A * 1-1,.-
i
m.
Mil
IAMHIW i out MM
im
... i
i ' ' ' ' ' t ' ' ' i
•PtMIOI
1
rn
11*11C
Mill
"i«
tMPACTOM TTPt
IkllH
•!«•. IIKM1I
moi
TOM
c»
ill i « «!•
ulllllilx
l|ltj
c/
I I I I I I I
ifad
ivia i i i i i A i i i i
IIMM M*
mini.
.e. i
I «y». U»ii
arn it) ;m M>I
fn mm
M>IM» w. » n • | '•tf°i
JIM cmc«
« I
i I
i
r«cn»
ur M«T sn
.
. . • i . . . . ^ . . i . . A 1 1 1 A i A . . i
?7|23|7
3i|3»|4Q|4
l|45l44|4y
571 53 I S4
salami it
VK
UMC
TIMM
<>« hr
l»-l.
^Q-1^
/ '^i "^ * In
VELOCITf
•C
(*»,).
mince russuu
STAC!
IWCMIUU
OH* CAS MCTKB
DESIU0
IT. i.«r
OUTLCT
T_ i.
out
I HP ACTOR
TEMPERATURE
•r
CONDENSER
TEMPERATURE
•P
%
07 fV
/9n
79
7
S4»
i A
77
~T50~
VJ
•77
V.3
LI
/.o
77
&
1 *
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location^
Run number
Sample date
£xrfou$F Recovery date ///*?
Recovered by
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse
container number _
Acetone blank
container number
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Filter number
-o 3
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Container sealed
Received by
Remarks .V.-,-'
LABORATORY CUSTODY
N.''/:,.;. T<-._ Date
~> '.'
B-63
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
sum
MISS. I MISS
III. Mil' ("•
OH* CAS MCTKB
TTHPCRATUM:
TiCcV
CONDENSER
TEMPERATURE
•r
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
/o c
Sample location //0
£fy/fcJ?T
Run number /?S/f\C^
Sample date _
Recovery date
Recovered by _
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container number YZop
Filters
Stage
/) .
Filter number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Container sealed
•*•'/-'
Received by
Remarks <
.LABORATORY CUSTODY
x'
B-65
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
|»»jlr|M|?ip
Mil
WWtlW IOUIIW
tm
'ilnliiliilM nliiHIM nlw it iilii
)4|)%li«lii|M nliiltt
i* / . j j / .AJ if J 'jy
/i/iWi/3i iM..tt
•>|<>Ui||U|M
"I'j^
ll|ll|ll M l\|lt|ll || II
»|*'|»'|"lMh*l>*h
M|n|*^ii[«7[ri ««i«>[»i|*i|i«|i'
!'«[•
'IMI N
Ullllll
Will
AN*
Wtll Ml.
r«ctai »
m.
IUK CMC!
cm
I
r«cT«i
c
ract«
«*l Ml
WAI Ml
•f.v
t|
Ml*
JU
till
TOT,
IIM
1 1
Illlllll
w •t|«tlir
[^
IN
•l"l"l«fr
ffiE
T^RT;
-*• J '
3H
1 A
' ' '
1 1 A
1 «
I 1 A
A 1 1
ik
yHltlioiiluiiJii
ig70|>i
5»iS»IS4
IV
"V CMC* TIM
UHCN. ()4 kr
VELOCITY
I
oniricc russu
DirrtWMTIAL
UNI.ln.NjOI
TCMTCMTUU
DM CAS MCTKB
TrMPCKATUU
VACUUM,
II
IT. i.»r
OUTUT
e«t
IHPACTOM
TEMPERATURE
•P
CONDENSER
TEMPERATURE
•P
n
JUU
LO
y^.T^
65
/ D
so
o>
^_
LC,
sP-
81
2-J
J-4-
i — i
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Sample location //Q
Run number
Sample date //
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container number
xfjj-Aat.7/" Recovery date
Recovered by
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Liquid level
marked
L
2oo ft
Liquid level
marked
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Filter number
' r
Containersealed
" 00 >
Received by
Remarks
. x1
--• -*•-
LABORATORY CUSTODY
--^"' •
^-•'/-/..i *.. Date
/'' -^'c-'- /?':/' 3
/
B-67
-------
IMPACTOR EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
• CITf
llllllllll|ll|l«|lt|lt|l>|lt|ltbl|n|M|lllM|M|)l|>Hll|H|N|lt|ll|)l
••"•r~irr*»im»-f-™i%_—* "-—"-- j"~ii...* _T ~T—-% ~ 1. .. _ i 1 I
Mil
EE
IOUIIM
Tm
'M*'!**'vl*>J«'l"HM%*l>'l"h'lv'l"l%tIH>*l''l'tl''l'»('«|M|ft|>tIi
i/./TiCiOilirf.
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
•ftMIOI
i)n|»|i^n|n|»t|i»
II NP
»tii%.
(IN
lltllt
INPACTO* TYPt
ildti IMIH
•!«•. (IKNftl
PlttT
IIM
c»
TWM
!H''|M
l>|ll|)r|i|hl
-* ^•ia^Ai—I
•litI|«>|«I|M|«V ]hlMit|lll«'
I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I
1 I I I * i I I I I
1 I A I i
-t_L
EH
IUCTM •• tm
l»|»|it|uhi|ii|'«|'*H"l'
MUfll.
itlitlniiiln
".0. |%«vtiUtii I
III 'MM nolMiM
Mill
• N t
Mill CM.
f
m.
IIM CMC*
cm
MCTOi
MCIM
ut
MM Ml
U
JUS
I I I I
II[M|»
J_L
K7
"I"!*4!**
>t[ill»ll>'
'•l'»l'»l"
A ' I «
»I I IA
J_L
J_L
_L
-------
ANDERSEN IMPACTOR RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant o /b,vof^ _ Sample date
Sample location M> -/ 5e<*uJa.ry C*h*.vsl Recovery date
Run number P^£&<3 fe^C^S _ Recovered by
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Nozzle rinse
container number
Acetone blank
container number
Filters
Stage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Backup
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
ft
Liquid level
marked
Filter number ^1 '--/I Container sealed
ine
/
v/jF-26
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by
Remarks
<- <.
/
B-69
-------
TRACER INJECTION DATA
B-70
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
f
Plant
Injection location
Barometric j>ressure
Operatoi
in
.Hg/
Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
n
psi
Time
(24-h)
/^/^
,^%'
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/2,(r/
//.56
//,/ 5
/•2>&l
Initial
/
/
S
/
y~i,&i
Time
/2,5?
/2^o
/2..13
/2.&,0
Final
/
/
/
fa b7-
Average
^9-fee?
Injection
rate,
cc/min
^?6o
Injection
time, min
/?,&
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-71
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
///
Injection location /7//Z
Barometric/pressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
Time
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
Jiff
fl
/l./t,
,0
/3,/tr
'
70
ft -1d'
12
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-72
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
Barometric
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
X
*.
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-73
-------
Date
TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
^
BarometriCxUressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator presure
_psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
X
W.It*
s
X
ft,**
X
/3
/JV-7
X
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-74
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Injection location
/
Le. —
Barometric/pressure
Operate
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
4 '*?•
/3,/Z-
ft Mb
It.W
II.
40
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-75
-------
Date
A/V-ts
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
X"
Barometric mressure
Operator L^jJ,
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
/>>
1 1,16
//-£•/
tt.tf
//.It,
/A £3
/fa*
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-76
-------
Date
I' I *1 -%>
Injection location
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO. _
Plant
Barometric pr^isure
Operator
Regulator pressure
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
//.f f
•50.
v//
7
3.0
//,
^- z-
)
//*?
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-77
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
yT/^f
*f- P-*-IA s2*
Barometric ope'ssure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
£? psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
ft./b
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
lilt
12,
Final
Average
1331
Injection
rate,
cc/min
43 >o 2-
Injection
time, min
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-78
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
/- *l ~
Injection location
Barometric ressure
Operator
Regulator pressure
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
_psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
17
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
J2.W
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B--79
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date /" /T " "S3
Plant
Injection location ./$£ X^y /^T/^
Barometri c^feT
>^ ^
Operator //-<
f —
!/
/T&&ZCO- /AccwiA /wfetf.
f £f#4c^vL/^^/**f'^rf*.6>b
' Average
•/-#•£#
Injection
rate,
cc/min
^^5
Injection
time, min
T?>O
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-80
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.'
Plant
Injection location
£?Wi*£»T
Barometric pressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
ff /
Regulator pressure /^ psi
Time
(24-h)
/oil
t
/CZ$
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/'7^?
/2,4(
/2-ZZ
fzAl
/3&1
n,i%
rt
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
A
Injection location
Barometric
Operator
Regulator pres«/re
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
psi
fa.l-f
fa,
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
. 6 4
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
X
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-82
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Injection location
Barometricj>ressurj
Operate
in.Hg Ambient temperature,
Regulator press
ore
_psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
tf'tf
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
X
X
X
X
Time
Final
X
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
/o.o
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
ti
B-83
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
n
Injection location
Barometric ppeisujf-e ±
Operator
Regulator pressu
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Time
(24-h)
b^y
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
fr.W
/?-37
fr&is
/2,2,a
Initial
^
/
/
*/-$.£&
Time
IJ%£
U, GO
iJ.Pb
/p ,o (
Final
/
/
/
' f?ff&
Average
"7^£>
Injection
rate,
cc/min
^.t-3
Injection
time, min
$$.o
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-84
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
H-S-S
Injection location
A
Plant rfe/fag-gg-
Uks^.
Barometric pre^ure
( ^f~
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressu
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
. 55'
/*>$
- 1
A- Z*
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-85
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
/-
"|
Plant
Injection location
/?/
Barometric p/essure
Operator
Regulator pressure
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
, 0
- 7
5 /
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-86
-------
Date
Injection location /vi (L
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
5» 7
Barometric pjjetsure,
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
I
psi
Time
(24-h)
#02^
/? tf
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
#•*?
/i $6.
/;,*&
tifi*>
BJ-I
&2-1
//-/
fT^
/?.-&>
/;Yf
/J<3&
/?&i'
C/e't
f/f'L
o/-/
M-t
Initial
X
/
/
^^\
1^
/
/
/
wyj
^r*
Time
/73V
£,4f
b^t
/J.31
fc.Ze
/S-fg
tf'5*-
ti.te
Final
X
/
/
^s.y.3
/
/
fart
Average
41.**
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO. 4
Plant
Injection location
Barometric pressure
Opera torC—~7frf>
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator prestwre
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
/
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
tf.'H*
Jl.kl-
A??
Ml
4
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-88
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
Date
-
Injection location
RUN NO.
Plant
- 14
Barometric Assure
[ j~-J>T
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Regulator pressu
_psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/mi n
Injection
time, min
X.
LWv.
2 ^. Z 1 . 2
n.+l
-------
TRACER SAMPLE COLLECTION DATA
B-90
-------
Date /
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO. -P£tf//K'V«^
Plant
Sampling location At
'«
Barometric pressure HI- *> 3.
in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator S<-^{.
Sample bag leak checked
Stack temperature, °F
Sample train leak checked
t/
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
AP
Rate meter
flow^rate,
Dev.
I
I/
o 3
/,
-> &
i a
/,
/C e>
Q - Q
-) 100
avg.
Average
B-91
-------
SFe TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
/
Plant
C/O
Sampling location
/y0, T
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
ll
f»
m
I/
\\
n
dp '
Time
(24-h)
1711
l IB
Traverse
B3-4
ffTJi-V
6)
- 3
'M
(I£L
Y/r) c 4 -
AP
a
7
ft/x
tf Yff
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Q - Q
Dev. = ( ^Si) 100
avg.
Average
(Must be <10%)
1n.Hg
Dev.
B-92
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date /' /* Dev. = ( Q"W) 100
^avg.
f A/-
/
Average
be
B-93
-------
TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
/
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F ^\5
Operator
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
Cl-l
AH
66 -I
Q - Q
-) 100
Sample train leak checked
AP
in.H20
(*
/
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Average
be
Dev.
B-94
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
i
//&,
Sampling location _
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F r&
Operator
v»y
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
Sample train leak checked
AP
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
in.Hg
Dev.
1
V,
c t>
Q - Q
-) 100
A
M'/
Average
B-95
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPUflG FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date A/7-/3
Plant
Sampling location tfff. r
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag leak checked
Stack temperature, °F
Sample train leak checked
in.Hg
Time
(24-h)
7/5/7
VT^averse
tl-l
CL) CL-1
fi) Dl- /
ffi
ft
(//
cl-3
AP
/.¥ /T7
/,37t
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Dev.
fO)
LL-3
M
- T.3
t/
01 -
Q - Q
-) 100
"avg.
}
Average
/£/ v 7
1,3 -£ 55
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
M
13
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
*-7
Operator i£
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
iX
Sample train leak checked
B-97 .
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
in.Hg
B-98
-------
SF, TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
6
RUN NO.
Date ///?> 4> 7 Plant i.v59
f&: ay
i L : c>n
(4: 1 1
ikM^j
/^- 13
(4; 2>S
Traverse
Oi)i5 point
ftp- fe^-i
to) BZ-t
fe?N Gl-
(7^ Cl-"2-
te& Cb ~)
fiJ5S C^-'Z,
ri)O &\~i
fz^ &\ ~~L
(to) S?
(7s ^P
(?J ^^
(^M >S^
AP
j?^S/ 9^
%>u ^ &
3V ?o
\^l <%(
33-71
33 H~)
3^/"7")
^/ "?s^
^,q/ -|CS
jT?/ "TV
/
/
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
s'c^L-'fe*' - tr.z.
Average
rt rt
X Dev.a
( ^^) 100
B-99
-------
Date
TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
T */-
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator _ C. A /JTg
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
p\ctec
—.
s^^
Time
(24-h)
&L
o
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
- XX y
Date \in/oJ> Plant /JJ/ltCO
Sampling location ^ y ^# Mf<->£7~
Barometric pressure <^A ?O in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F vS~£> Stack temperature, °F "7^
Operator
Sample bag
Time
(24-h)
/Z'OG
//.:
A?'. /^
/I '. 2^
'^Z-'- ZZx
/•z : z^L\
^7 "Z?
P Arres*sec*l^
leak checked ^^ Sample train leak checked ^.^x^
Traverse
point
3t=— &2-~J
3c~~ &Z-'Z—
**- c/-/
31?- C/—Z_
^«T- c£ -/
?»7 - C^> - Z_
^ {
13 / C-SL-
\.iS/ (^3
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
"
b v**^
-1-^
Average
r> r«
% Dev.a
'« Dev. =
av9
) 100
be <10%)
'avg.
B-101
-------
£fo&^
FlOl£»H
&ot*-j
Date
TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
Time
(24-h)
(3-Z3
Traverse
point
- C(-V
- C6-V
AP
3o/
/.£/
/./ /
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
7
Q - Q
Average
Dev.
-) 100
avg.
B-102
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
*
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator _
Stack temperature, °F
?
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
*X
( Q"Qav9') 100
Average
(Must be
in.Hg
B-103
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Date
•T.>/S?V>
c Ol f .•>
RUN NO.
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
-C
Stack temperature, °F
A-J"\
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
in.Hg
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
AP
in.H.O/
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Dev.
fc '
, -73"
/c -.
// :
7
ft cV
.
JLJL
u In
*« Dev.
Q - Q
100
Average
(Must be <10%)
B-104
-------
SF, TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
_~ - ^ •
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature, °F 6
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
:7
B-105
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
/
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag leak checked
Stack temperature, °F
Sample train leak checked
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
,6 / 69
3?
•7.776-7
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
in.Hg
:z
Dev.
3.37
-Si
Q - Q
-) 100
Average
B-106
-------
TRACER ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY
B-107
-------
mpnt U^l^Of)
PN 3 Wo-7
'Analyst _
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
30/Y.Y
1.11*10*
Wat-Yes
2992.
/O
(,¥
'/A
(, CM S/7t
r
/o
hi*
rik(?. bf ^
SO
B-108
-------
Cl lent //«
PN
f A
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Date
Analyst
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
r
20X10
'%
c • £•
0. M. A
~+ M» ••.*.
3
$320
ff.w.fi.
3
A// 7
UK
c-/
v
/>/
3?
C-
3
11-7/K7
H
/
i.Uxic
'%
/. 27*10
'*
r -
330*10'%
C-t
331
c-/
v
V
2. /g'X /<)"*
2.01 VO~
C-f
3X
B-109
-------
Client Ks UFA/ /
PN 3?fg •? Date
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Analyst
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
:oncen-
tration
v/v
31
E
3s-
C -G
3P
a
/)-/
C-A
27U4
r.-/
s-/rr-
71)" 7/7 s. 7
V/
?;.&/;/- r
Y?_
y*"
C-/
i 3
. 0
79-^777.
il
77.1/77-0
35
B-110
-------
Client ft
PN 1110-1 Date H7-13
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Analyst
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SFg TRACER
Sample I.D
Atten
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
'fc^/tf
- 1
n
,RL\_.
rt: PR-1
frQ.a/9/.i
2s- 7J. a:
c/ -
3?
33
71
7 OS/ 76$
C/-3
a-3
32
131
D/-3
D/-¥
PR - c
B-lll
-------
Client USfc'^ /
PN
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Date
Analyst
Calibration Number t-IT-?3
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
--3
33-
/ - y
1-ITxiO^
S/3- V
!(.(.**
//r
32.
57
/y
Cl • 1
/ 5-63-2
1.
734/710
2.
SS
/.Yfif/0*
17
/ 630.1
Ci-i
C/-3L
J2/
/.jox/o
'%
iK
4rL
t
S/3-7
ry
B-112
-------
Client _£/!_£
PN 1V70 '7 Date
Analyst
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SFg TRACER
Sample I.D
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
/on.*
S/'vo
70 Cj 70.1
/6
13
if,
(,0 7
/(*
S/8-/?
1.10*10'*
3?-
Si. 17* to"*
3 IT
£/•
-------
Client Us L.P/9 I
PN IWo-t Date 7-a.*-a
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Analyst
<>
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SFg TRACER
CUT Oft I'? &C'
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
f '
7 h -
r '
1.
(.(9*6*7
.
93* '0*1
I27Z
/6
s Y.I
1C
Mil-la
-
/(*
+Kn*
'
lio
IISS.JL
5^- W
Ik
7/0
H,
fb
777-4
7/.J
70
/(*
7/fc.fr
/(a
1.I7XIQ'*
i* ^
Jtft.H
y/v
B-114
-------
rn»nt UlL'P/] //?
PN 3V7*-? Date 1-9'-*}
Analyst G^t'G ML' /*/;-:*. 5
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis.
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
TRACER
Sample I.D.
Atten .
Peak
Height
Response
oncen-
tration
v/v
/*/£
y?
n
f,
7.
37
5-3
35
/zoo
5-7
1/6*1
/*/£>
/J/0,1
31*
/273-t,
6?
331
(,7
x-2 r/-
. (,
/. 61* l
71
X7//7
B-115
-------
EXAMPLE SFg STRIP CHART PRINTOUTS - JANUARY 1983
CALIBRATION
BACKGROUND
INJECTION SAMPLES
B-116
-------
_!_i . • : | : ; . i : j_l L I
j i'~~" ".r~~ ~±r:~."±~ rrr-iT ziij±r!i;Ttjr!ii~it.^ii~:'riri"'il"l nJ-L'..!
J_i_ji7" ~ , — | - '"f""~~i",""'~:~'r"' |~~rt"r|~H"-|—; ;----f-r-:- ~-
^ , | _____ JJ I ^' I ; ' ! ' ' | ; . I . I I 1 ' I 'I h_
• '"' •" '"^ ~" ~ ' "~ '
B-H7
-------
100
, i I
'.'. ~ ! ' ' " I
r--.2-.iTJ—4.rm:-iL"ia iiu
B-118
-------
B-119
-------
B-120
-------
_.~._r~ 'uj " ' ,'"
.. i.._..;..
£*«)»
100 —
• • —T— • j ; ; ^~ f \ "3-~~ * ' ' ' ' • l^f • _
i • • •- - ! • ... •• - !—•.-..«b ~T"X • •"-
50 -
.10
m
*fta>
•'.-.- ..._^^_4'..-_:j ^I__£^J:_;._::_;
-V:
'"_ "' 1" "_. T1" ; 7.1.1
*VM=
---I:-. .;ii::! :::
B-121
-------
B-122
-------
B-123
-------
B-124
-------
——j- .—.-tr——rj
B-125
-------
.•-:.: t:;:::;:i:
B-126
-------
:fc£*>
Ttfc-d*
^^
._-o^p
" rriTtr"
1- . j ' ~ ••:':•'•
:-;-p~:
B-127
-------
B-128
-------
B-129
-------
B-130
-------
100-t-r
B-131
-------
.— -4 ' ' I —
-^noxnrri :i;g • H -t n 'x^L^v&^'.z^^-^^^tt^f *yfrgy
SEir^!?=
_J
;-p_
— I _i
—TT- s^3r<-^ ::::i:
B-132
-------
B-133
-------
LABORATORY DATA
rn»nt US tPfi/A
2Y
^> .1
V
V^T
5T
i>%.b"
G
G-5"
7
7 S"
£
g-.s'
9
f s"
/o
10. ±
n
//.fT
/«P-
/5-i"
/3
/J.5"
/v
/Y-i"
/5"
/S'S
/6-
/^.3"
/7
/7.y
n
/is'
/?
N
(TD/TGC)
*
•/f
Atten.
^(a
2ff
\w
/PV
6Y
^Y
33
/6
g'
?
V
^
H
/
/
Peak
Height
6M"
Y^ fc
M A* ^
V |y . J
t/S'Y
tA rc
"^YV-^
i'/-^
(,C 6
^Y-6
O'-o
73 0
s'P?
—
?6.^
r^.^
:e: 5^/cA//m/>-
ige TimeC
Cone. (Co
1
Response
6/.3
—
6fc 2-
Vi't
6/-0
ivb
SV.S'
6^ ^
^7-/
S'Zg'
7t.o
M
ifi-0
TQCI : ^POk 3- -OKI*
): y.WXX/O'i
C « CoE"
Cone.
j£/Vil /v
y,7??//
-------
w
I
M
Ul
10,000
I
SF6 CALIBRATION JANUARY 19, 1983
m = .86787899
b = 10.054926
r = .99996
1000
100
10
10
TYPICAL WORKING RANGE
-12
10
,-H
10
-10
,-9
10
SF6 CONCENTRATION, v/v
10
-8
10
-7
10
-6
Example SFg calibration curve - working range
-------
DECEMBER 1982 PRELIMINARY TEST DATA
SF6 INJECTION
SAMPLE COLLECTION
SFg ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
B-136
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
1.
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
14 17
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
•6
2.
RUN
NUMBER
ww
OPERATOR
td-VF
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
Jf .
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
SPmf-ff
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
•
21
Jl
JJ
MOLECULAR
WT.
.<*?.">*
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
)IAM OH SIDE 1
. **. . .
SIDE 2
i A • . .
PI TOT
TUBE Cp
,jr
MOISTURE
%
*f.°.
40
• I
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.8 .9 .10
A-/
A
3
f
*r
6
TM^n^
A "
f
= ^^ c. ?iS-^y/T,
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
1.
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
fi
J4 t't
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
47
*6
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
y.v .
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC
(in. H20)
21
31
33
16
MOLECULAR
WT.
.2.9.
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
3IAM OH SIDE 1
fojfi • , _.
SIDE 2
• . • , i
PITOT
TUBE Cp
_.?^
MOISTURE
t
£*.«>
40
«< it
* '
FIELD DATA
70
73
76 .
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7 . B . 9 .10
-/
POSITION
(in.)
11 .1 7 ,13«U
VELOCITY
HEAD
(ip ) , in.HjO
7 J.J6 «57 , J8 ,79
.ft,
STACK
TEMP, "F
36,39 ,40 ,41
3-138
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Injection location
Ba rome t r ic--tfre s s u re
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
ress
psi
Time
(24-h)
/Z12-
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
Z//.S3
?W 'O.Ik
2l\,v
Initial
^"
^^
ZX4
Time
Z£>?./^
?^?^
2<&M
Final
/
/
Z,
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date /I
Injection location L2>o<.-c,
Plant
J/T^/^^€> -
Barometrip^pressure
Opera to r
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
r res
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
tfi/
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/W&
/?&* ,
/&Z3
Initial
^
^
3 30
Time
/34.&0
/?z,3o
/?3£*
Final
/
/
2.4
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
OF
Barometric^pfessure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
r pres
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
A33
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
^£5
5^'.VS
^3^
^5^.
Initial
y
/
/
#>.n
Time
W.rf
•59. f?
^?.^v-
607-0
Final
/
X
/
^^7
Average
/0-of-
Injection
rate,
cc/min
/&.&?-
Injection
time, min
J2.C? O
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-141
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Injection location
Barometric pressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
PSi
Time
(24-h)
/tf*
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, oc/min
Time
59,2£-
^.^
i5£ f S.
^32-
Initial
/
^
/
/£>,//
Time
'^S.e«
5f.o5"
5
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location,
Barometric yr€$3ure
Operator
of
3c>.
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
'
Regulator pressure
ess
psi
Time
(24-h)
^V/
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
ll
-------
Date
' /C -
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection
location L^bocM<,T^i
Barometric^pfessure ;3°>/O
Operator
^/
?fr*^ tt>£7 <=* £
f*
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F ^O
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
/?tt
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
M
/M
rtn-
/1,1e
Initial
^
/
/
3c«b
Time
^ /#/?
/^3^
/^^
/^f3
Final
/
/
/
^C^Z
Average
*>& ^
Injection
rate,
cc/mi n
2*f>
-------
Date
-/O -
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
Barometric
Operator
rt?
£T
pr
Regulator pressure
/ O
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
psi
Time
(24-h)
/3W-
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
tfrft]
fi,2>&
/4,rft>
$4-3
Initial y
/
/
y
JfS'S
Time
/#£#
/tf 4/
ftfi2>l-
/3,33
Final
x
/
/
3o,^4-
Average
^
SC1.^? I
Injection
rate,
cc/min
2>£>.^f|
Injection
time, min
/£$>.O
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-145
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
-//'
Plant
Injection location j
/J'
Ba romet r i c^re s s u re
rt * i
Operator
- Z&
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
_psi
Time
(24-h)
rtcq-
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
rt/z
/3,c$
/4, ft
/f; //
Initial
^
/
/
3l«c->
Time
^.^f
?£,tf
10,(,T^
Z^frt
Final
/
/
/
2
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
A
Injection location
Barometric pjseflure
Operate
\
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °f
Regulator p/essure
_psi
Time
(24-h)
/C'W-
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
2P.{rf
?Mf
2c>,bi
W-k-l'
Initial
/
/
/
.3tfo*
vTime
?o. %
7V. tf
ZO.^^T
?.t?*e>c
Final
X
X
/
?^,<8S
Average
^^.^^
Injection
rate,
cc/min
/. "o <74
Injection
time, min
W,o
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-147
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN N
Date
Plant
///fr3D"v4,
Injection location
32-/A; &T
Barometric Dfessure
Operator
Regulator prssure
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Time
(24-h)
/^3
(
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
•10^.
tc.tf
10 bo
?OY\
Initial
/
X
/
^.T?
Time
A^?'
/^?^
/f3*
/^,^>
Final
/
/
/
3v.?t
Average
3^. fe
Injection
rate,
cc/min
W*
Injection
time, min
£6.0
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-148
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
Barometric pressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
time, min
300
233-21
n
' 1
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
Injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-149
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location /•/£
Barometric pressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
I1
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
'r - *
* w
&t
i V- ?
.'/- ?
, v • f
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
'<#> ^
.'-,- ">j.
<: • i
/r vS
?C.7*'-.
*tl
4/1
M
ty
t
Initial
X
/
/
2<;*$
(^)
6-r
sJ
&l
&t-
Time
/6.? XV
/5,5r
/
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date
/J /-.I- '$£-
Plant
4e
^z-^
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/C. 7^-
l^.^l
/ -; 3V-
/1. ^^~
/.-'
*T'
y •* '„« .
u- "> .'
-4 ^
r»"
/
Initial
x
/
/
u.^
(•^
61
6:1
11
/of
Time
A 3>z
/5.>-(
,/l^-
A//-^
Final
/
/
/
$2 .^ I
Average
32,^1
Injection
rate,
cc/min
3>?.*n
Injection
time, min
ZCr.C
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
Injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-151
-------
Date
V
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO
Plant
Injection location ,<'.
Barometric^pressure
Ope r a to r
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F -^
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
//:^5
d3 • /
Cl 2
13 5
& -4
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
ft 32-
frM
ri-*
/1.'lf-
•~9 J *f~
'T'
4#-
/ j+
-7^-
/
Initial
/
/
/
3* -(r\
i-r^
^
/'<*>
'/?>
/K
Time
}gT^
nrt
ft r+
nii-
Final
/
/
/
32 ,c5
Average
57 3>
Injection
rate,
cc/min
-3^-35
Injection
time, min
74 'G
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-152
-------
Date
/z-/z-
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location ,
Y/.///U
Barometric/pressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
7
Regulator pressure
Time
(24-h)
/tr^
bi-i
b/-^-
f->|-3
Di-^
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/f;.Y^
!\>.('i
K.Vs
A-?z
^H
^
*-/•/-
V/f
6
Initial
//
/
/
32 .05
^)
£-£-
/S-&*
/7*
1'6-
Time
/y^i
A/^
/^?^
A'?>>
Final
3/.f5
Average
32 tc-
Injection
rate,
cc/min
3>7:C-G
Injection
time, min
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-153
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN
Date
Injection location
Barometric,pfessure
Operate
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
/2U-
)>l '
te-z
b? 3
^'/ • ^
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/f."/r
/&^~
/5"«,
An
?//
^//'
4'7
f//
I
Initial
/
/
/
3/, f 5
^0
^-c
?r
/^
/£Z-
Time
/l?f
/j?.^^
/f (t:^
/^/^
Final
/
/
/
5/,'S
Average
5/.fy
t
Injection
rate,
cc/min
3/.f/
Injection
time, min
/*r, ^
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-154
-------
Date /> ~ /?
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO
Plant
Injection location
Barometric aressure
/ /
Operator "Z^C
?-?.i-z
£/-3
#/• V
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/£?*,
/1,K
K&t
/z.li
v/
///
^/r
V
/
Initial
/S
/
/
3V. v'^
^J
i'-a
&••
-s?
^f
Time
/f./S
/•J ^^f-
/^^5
/-b'^-/
Final
/
/
X
3^'//
/Average
$j,m
Injection
rate,
cc/min
3-Z-/?
Injection
time, min
5f,e?
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-155
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN N0
Plant
Injection location
'fil <5&rlu.<>-r -
BarometriCxpfissure
Operator ' ^
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
_psi
Time
(24-h)
/32I:Z>-I
Average
5/,f6
Injection
rate,
cc/mi n
31.^(0
Injection
time, min
/3,P
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-156
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
T - P i
£>* ^
83 4'
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
A 7f
/£y>Y
/S?.7?
/tf,e^/
-2-ft
tfy
wi
1st
L
Initial
x
/
/
3l.z*i
fr>N)
M"^
/•$%
//J
/3k
Time
'£ ^
/ ' /
/^ O ^
/^*/5-
/^ /^
Final
/
/
/
31.3^
^Average
2?//l^
Injection
rate,
cc/min
3MJ£
Injection
time, min
/J>O
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-157
-------
Date A3 -
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location
Barometric^pressure
Operate
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
3 /. •
SA-i
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-15B
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date /y£ -/«X -fr> Z- Plant ffZrt&O- l/te£M4;fa/Jfe#/tJ6TeA'
Injection location /^^^//^7/f/A' d^X/fc>7 1 <-ST - reV~3
Barometri cpressure
Operator^ -j^7
£
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
^ o
/' ,
Regulator pressure £-? psi
Time
(24-h)
J6:j
bv (
K2) z
b^-3
m ^
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
//* j/.-/
/#£!
ftfa,
tfffa
•2-H
4>fr
tit
qf-jff
I
Initial
/
/
/
3& %r
ffc)
//j,
tfz.
'-tt
'12-
Jime
' ft,?!
/f,$f
H^
/$ & 1'
Final
/
/
\/
32.14-
Average
^i^'-H
Injection
rate,
cc/min
J5A V?-
Injection
time, min
/^/ ^
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-159
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN N
Plant
Injection location
//e 'tftf-TSt
Barometric j>pessure
/ /
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
/6^.
M •!
^ z
c«~5
c*t- 1
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/Sfr7
tf.tfi
/?& '•
rf.tf
^//-
^.v
£jf-
rV/'
I
Initial
/
/
X
,U-/4-
fy^}
w '
c)'i
tfs-
/#Z-
Time
/ti^c
/fJ-7-
/tfjt-/
-/^
/^3^
Final
2>r$£
Average
^/^
Injection
rate,
cc/min
2,A^£
Injection
time, min
/£
-------
Date
- /^ - s ?-
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Injection location /W/l//r,///t/
Barometric gpes'sure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
J>si
Time
(24-h)
/^'|
^-/
fr ?
Ct>-*>
te-q-
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
*?.*,'•
W<
/M*
M>$
///
&
t/r
•i/f
i
Initial
/X
/
X
3i'.VY
/^;
X/3
/5^ i.
VST*
I4c
Time
/«v&
/€^
/^^
/^^
Final
/
/
/
3". 4 /
Average
3A 6^
Injection
rate,
cc/min
3c.6tf
Injection
time, min
M^
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
9-161
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NC
Plant
Injection location
Barometric pressure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
^ psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
ff.fr
3"
3/-OZ-
ft
-**
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-162
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO
Plant
Injection location
7
Barometric presure
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator prssure
ress
psi
Time
(24-h)
t
,H2
(.1-$
A" (r
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
11.2*1
rv.s-f
tfto-
?i l\
L'ti
?f!
i
Initial
/
/
X
f^.fec
f7J
174
/?/
Time
/?^2-
•^.t"f
-/^'. >>
/?A4
Final
/
/
/
w-\i
Average
MM
Injection
rate,
cc/min
•2431
Injection
time, min
/SO
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-163
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Date /?.-•"' 3~ % /- Plant ;
A i] ,
Injection location /£{.(£ rn/ETA) *J
Barometric pfe
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
Time
(24-h)
/ff^
^-6
C ^t
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
ti^
2^-d'
1C >2>
/^;^"
6"/^
*ff
I
Initial
/
/
/
/
3c,/«
/-f^
•?3
^
Time
/^-^/
/^/^
A'.^^
tf.kz-
Final
X
/
/
2*",^
^ Average
V1-^
Injection
rate,
cc/min
— — .^ ,^?
3i>
Injection
time, min
f^. &
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-164
-------
Date
/7 ' IV
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
n5A££&-
Injection location
Barometric
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
L,
psi
Time
(Z4-h)
//C X
^-'y
^>^-
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
#&l
/f, &
V.&-.
frfr
faft
m
i
Initial
/^
/
/
?t>.&i>
/'.,)
fe
/v.
Time
/^^
MM
/?.&
tf.M
Final
/
/
/
Zr,?^
Average
ST. 4- 5
Injection
rate,
cc/min
3r-<^
Injection
time, min
-rr ^
o < c. -
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-165
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN N
Date
Injection location
x^
Ba romet ri c/pre ^ s u re
OperatorL ^
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
_psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-156
-------
Date /P--/3" #'.*>
fa t~
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
ff,fg
tf,£?
/rfSjj^
/tf>4&'
L*fl
2>/~f
t
Initial
/
/
/
2S-6- ?
fo)
&Z
x^-
Time
/*/ tW~
2^,1*
/tit-4
/%!?>
Final
/
/
/
3C-*H
Average
*£'•&{-
Injection
rate,
cc/min
^e'-S4-
Injection
time, min
^t C>
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-167
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO
Plant
Injection location /y?/ L-*i/er,
T ~ Tc
Barometric QpeTs)u re
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
T°
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
:'I3'&
£i- 5
fo- £,
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
tf,^
?<-',/'
/$,{•¥-
ft, ? J>
Ui
-j&r
u
Initial
/
/
/
3*. '^hl
ft*)
£,'j
/.*£
Time
Ififi ^
/<^^^
/£^3
/^/fe»
Final
/
X
/
3r /H
^.Average
3^41
Injection
rate,
cc/min
-3)T> 2J-/
Injection
time, min
<$,c?
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
3-168
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN N
Date /^ ' /c>" 0 £- Plant rfe4?f d-oXT/i//.' Oc'-T~ r&f'1 *-* ' '
BarometrtjE^ffessure
Operator— t^^-
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
?«>
Regulator pressure ^psi
Time
(24-h)
/ i^j/^.
bl -^
b/-<2?
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/^
//?f?-
1^3
//W3
^/•/
3^V'
L
Initial
/
/
/
Zr-fJi
(-T^)
<*ft
?/
Time
/4' ^^~
//?£r
££**+-
}£*&<3
Final
/
/
/
3r, /^
Average
.3r,-3n
Injection
rate,
cc/mi n
^,^.33^
Injection
time, min
-6 i^7
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-169
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN N
Date
Injection location
Barometric opesSure
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
_psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
V/
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-170
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO
Date
Plant
Injection location
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F "(
Regulator pressure
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-171
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN
Date
Injection location
Barometric pjsessure
Operate
S=TY -
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
~ PSI
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/mi n
Injection
time, min
A//3?-
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-172
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO .
Date
Injection location
Barometric
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
psi
Time
(24-h)
Calibration data
Time
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Initial
Time
Final
Average
Injection
rate,
cc/min
Injection
time, min
X
'f
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-173
-------
SFg TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
RUN NO
/
Date /V- ~/v:> '*£"*- Plant fT3^^^°w \^£*>"* k 1 Jt)for->t\ tn^t"
A /I ~r- K K i§
Injection location /"?/* Cxt^T.A^O —S.(r"T ~ to/^-T \^>'~'*&—
Barometric oi^sl
Operator L— -r^T*
Jure
(^
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
-7-0
/ '
Regulator pressure ^> psi
Time
(24-h)
//^?
h^<
^8-(.-
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
/f,£r
/^-^
?<-.<*!
tf.'fr
i-f
'&
/'}£$
Final
X
x
X
'2>C<14-
Average
;3^-^b
Injection
rate,
cc/min
30.^4^
Injection
time, min
s^n
Note: The tracer gas injection rate is set immediately before the actual source
injection and checked at the end of the source injection. The source
injection rate is the average of initial and final.
B-174
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS INJECTION DATA
Date
?- /3- fe.
RUN m.
Plant
Injection location
Barometric
Operator
in.Hg Ambient temperature, °F
Regulator pressure
_psi
Time
(24-h)
/?&>
i
Calibration data
Bubble meter rate, cc/min
Time
#>'
/9>f
/1,/f-
frz/
Initial
x^
/
X
3>
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Date
RUN NO.
Plant
-7S
&&fr*4—
Sampling location
*/£/*.*.«
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
v
Sample train leak checked
in.Hg
Time
(24-h)
X.2.24
/**/
/23t>
/Mt
iize.
/23I
/Z3i,
t*&37
Traverse
point
n t *~~
H
il
it
AP
in.H20 x
^,^<5 (&)
3.tt (S3)
j,tf (f?)
S'tf (ss)
*4o (si)
z.6>* (s'e)
3.<>o (S&)
340 (fg]
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
^&0
«
rip*
H
It
It
Average
Q - Qavo
a* nnw - r. »\SM mn ^Mu«:t HP
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Date A2 A'A
RUN NO.
Plant
- r^,
/ /
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
In.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked »"
Time
(24-h)
f4*f
/U3t>
/4*CC-
~ f~
Average
a Q - Qavo
a* nnu - I - a.v_9M inn rMur.t HP
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Date
ir
ie1
•n1
tc
e
RUN NO. /A- 5
/**/fc>- Pl.nt A~~- 7^~~
ig location ^«^»U^MM^. 3-t4*4H**T
ff
trie pressure 3c>-l$>
t temperature, °F •— V^ Stack temperature, Of(fru~4*
>r &L*uH+<+
VI ff
bag leak checked ^ Sample train leak checked ^
in.Hg
^H>)
X
Time
(24-h)
l&
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Sampling location &l4+i&+*fat4
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked ^
Time
(24-h)
tiff
J(f6*>
Jt6f
/1ft
/£*/£'
I If ft
/tff
ntD
Traverse
point
7&-J- s/o.r
a
n
Trtt 4- fi/o.+
"
„
AP
in.H20
3.0 ($3)
3$ (&)
3.o to)
J.9& (*fg)
3.6 (it]
3.c ftr)
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
&t>
gffV
Average
a Q - Qava
a* now - I- aX3.:.^ inn (Mu«;t HP
% Dev.a
•
avg.
^
B-179
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date ^-/fi^Z- Plant /w**l£> — /o^****^
Sampling lo
Barometric
Ambient tern
Operator
Sample bag
Time
(24-h)
4 ¥6
9ty
qgftptf
toe?
cation &<+++*»+A. >Ct-^i~«^"~
// \
pressure 3&./O (^y^&e^ "t.^ ' rf*0 } 1n.Hg
perature, °F ^ J
M**4fa~
»
>tack temperature, °F
leak checked |X Sample train leak checked */
Traverse
point
ti ~ *
2-
3
y
^
(.
& " 1
A
^
*/
f
L
in.H20 '
/,^? ^
X * V? ^^?"^ /^/? /
/,7^ ^rl
^,f^ ^^7
^^ ^V7/)
/•74^ <^V^
/.5^ ^^7)
/,;^ fy7y;
^.^ ^>7 )
/./^ f#7)
&
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date JA~/0- V2'~ Plant >&**<££> — i+*~*~ +-
Sampling location ±&4*~*L+»M, 4*<6*»/+J
Operator
Sample bag
Time
(24-h)
r& ( f
/$ ^. 5
//3^
C^ff^L
leak checked *"" Sample train leak checked V
Traverse
point
4- /
j.
3
V
5^
I
&- 1
1
j
//
f
{,
,„!£,„ rn)
/S5b (^fy1
X.'foW?)
At>0 (f?)
X,70 fft)
£> ?e f?&)
£.eo (#t)
/.&> (47)
Z.Zs) (#7)
2.7# (ftf
?.£0 f ft)
ff ^^~ rU&i
r\ , & y ( ^r&/
-------
SF, TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
0
RUN NO.
- r
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
3o,/6
in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag leak checked
Stack temperature, °F JU,
Sample train leak checked
Time
(24-h)
/t>3$
SlM
/€*/
M02^
Traverse
point
A-/
JL
3
y
r
& - 1
i
/
v
^
^
AP
in.H20 ^rj
/ ^ ^)
#,y# (ft)
f.tb [yt)
ff.fcfyt)
3. cro (if)
$.*>£> (&)
2.*>ffe*}
f>7o fsZ)
fi.fo fcl)
t-.fo (&)
t.jo (&)
$.#) (6c)
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
^5*"
n — . Average
Q - Q fiP tn*.- /,65V
a« n™ - (. aYSM inn .. fMuct KP ;
3-102
.e> x
J,
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date /2-/*-1i>- Plant fk+~to - T*******
Sampling location i fc?)
2 3 6 (&)
S.tfo £&}
/•9e (f&\
f.k^ (ft)
% 1^ (tf)
*.r* (49)
*.YO (&)
/t.4S (S9)
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
~sfirG
~*t»
^ Average
% Dev.a
-) 100
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
SFZ
. tJA
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator'
Sample bag leak checked
Stack temperature, °F
Sample train leak checked
in.Hg
Time
(24-h)
/4-W-
/L/&4-
/4&<&
/4&'Z
/4<#?
/+/z-
/4/t
M/<*
rt'S
/4 zv
Mzi-
/42V
/4z+>
/VzS
Traverse
point
A-/
z
3>
Y
5'
<-
L4lA.«-^£ T&U-S*
Z- 1
z
3
4-
^
6
/d&Tez-r
AP
1"-H'}^)
Z,Z- ^ti.)
7 , 3S /^ /)
7,^0 /CJ>
3,oc^^^)
^.^^ /^O
3 ^ /L-c?)
^^o-/^?-)
P'1*(6>°\
J, ^Lt. - J.C./C,
% Dev.a
Dev. = ( ) 100
(Must be <10X)
3-184
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date /^"(t -<&"£- Plant r&MLdO -~ /JCxx*As L
/£/*/ Q-
/vy^7
/ys/
7^/5,3
/i/x^'^'
/^^ y
/ fj^. *7
a% Dev. = (-
p>rature, °F -^C" 5
/
~£"4j£-
>tack temperature, °F
^^o
reak checked Sample train leak checked
^Tfc-/<'^
Traverse
point
"B>- 1
li "Z-
3
4
5
6
/Vi^c- «/ y^ni
/?-?
?
J>
4
£
(&
£> j -f L^,
Q - Qavn ^
yM 100
^avg.
* /
"fyto
/ 70 /&*•)
$, ^0 ( foOy
2-(rC> (lr\\
2,^c (<* i\
7,^.5 ^j^)
3.IO /fca)
^//0 /5/)
^(6?o ((fl\
-------
Date
TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure 3£>-
in.Hg
Ambient tepperature, °F
Operator—f?<
Sample bag Teak checked
Stack temperature, °F ^
Sample train leak checked
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
AP
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Dev.
/600
5
3
A
\/
a Q - QavQ
•- Dev. = ( fiSfc-)
%
Average
(Must be
9*
^/<5^
^c
B-186
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date /V-/0-'oZ_ Plant /TW^ " (A^^A, lA^s-fr'Aic* ;d'i&<:>'~~ ^*#4<*£T
Barometric
f
pressure 3^- / ^ 1n.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F :5c> J
Operator —
Sample bag
Time
(24-h)
/5?1
/53/
fe3±
/33f>
/^3?
7:537
/^y/
/^3
/£*&
J^M 3
/£tL>3
/£&/
/553
/5^
>tack temperature, °F
"-^
l«k checked Sample train leak checked
^ykc/i
Traverse
point
B-i
z_
3
^/~
^
6
^/W/O^A«75
^- /
z
5
^A^ST
AP
/^5^^
2*» ^c5 ( fri?)
"2 • (?>& ( t> i j
2 /^f t ^ / )
yrfc-tn}
3, /o ^^
/ f^7 62)
„?, /5 ^S^
^-50 ^o)
J .%$• ^60")
^, ^O^c)
2.^0^6»l)
i 3 j .
'<__ r/lJi'^^jS^ — — G:.^
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
^r^oo
V
^6?oO
V
V
rj Average
' "A. o
% Dev.a
Dev. = ( iii-) 100
^avg.
(Must be <10%)
B-137
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag leak checked
Cf/D-l
^
3
V
S'
3
V
r
Time
(24-h)
ll /t
Traverse
point
- I
l% Dev. = (-
-) 100
avg.
in.Hg
Stack temperature, °F
Sample train leak checked
AP
Z.
V,-,
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Average
(Must be <10X)
Dev.
B-188
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
1n.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag leak checked
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
&-*
Q Q
Stack temperature, °F x^^
Sample train leak checked
AP
in.H20
Rate meter
flow rate,
Dev.
B-189
-------
SF, TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
o
RUN NO.
Date / *-'//"*>- Plant A>**-rC£<> — 77f^--A*Ht^'
Barometric
/
pressure 3^->-S in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F •*- ^' Stack temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag
Time
(24-h)
<}&
fas?-?,)
/oZl
&-•
ouc, LttbJ
leak checked *^" Sample train leak checked ^"
Traverse
point
*~/
^
5
V
j^
^,
^"/
•^
3
i
>r
&
AP
in.H20
/.y<£> ^Vj)
/7« ("^
^-.«> (^v)
?./&(&)
2^ (&)
t3o (s&)
l.fd (&)
2. /&(<&)
$.fO (&)
*-/4'C&)
Z.eo (s$)
?. *c (s$)
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
^ <>*>C
-------
TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
10
Date |Z^-|I'£2- Plant /7-5/^ £ G -^/A<^^A> /4/fetf/At6
Sampling location ^^^^ £»A^ y CJ/H-A^ST
Barometric
f
pressure "^>^ "^ "2 in.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F >/£*^53 Stack temperature, °F ^^£
Operator *
Sample bag
Time
(24-h)
P^n
/? lt~
/-?/?
X /
-trs^
r
leaK checked !
^^V
Traverse
point
3-/
Z
^
4
5
6
3. ^
rn* _ £J_
*y - il—
AP
^.^T- ^5,^
/F<^ ^J^)
/?5? /^?)
/>2>o fe
% Dev.a
(Must be <10%)
B-191
-------
Date
SF, TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
0
RUN NO.
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temp£f*5"ture, °F
Operator^-.- /Jvf>-
Sample bag Ie6k checked
in.Hg
Stack temperature, °F =•
Sample train leak checked
7*?
Time
(24-h)
/ISO
Traverse
point
A-l
g-l
3
&•*/-
Dev. = ( av9') 100
,-i1 Qav9-
AP
5"- Oo
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Average
B-192
Dev.
-------
Date
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
C
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag leak checked
Stack temperature, °F
Sample train leak checked
in.Hg
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
AP
in.H20
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Dev.
Q - Q
VV*"-'A
Average
B-193
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date />£-/J?-F3- Plant #4++>u> ~i*6f-~*L.
Sampling lo
Barometric
Ambient tern
Operator
Sample bag
Time
(24-h)
Jo^
cation £***^/ 4JL*J~ 2W- (^^S£^)
pressure 2J*1t> in.Hg
perature, °F *^ Stack temperature, °F
4W^
leak checked ^ Sample train leak checked ^"
Traverse
point
fi'l
±.
3
1
f
f.
& " I
Z
3
*/
£~
^
AP
in.H20 ^N
X.0 ( Hi)
2.6 fffi
AS (£-*-!
3./t> fcz-
Z.zs' fa*}
9.rp (&})
2&Be> (f*'}
<*>ftrt> (T*^
3,c& (&>*)
3> 10 (££
$JJQ CS?)
mo (f~i)
^{*£L> (-?.€'
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
•
r^ 1 & Average
Wv>Q~St-'*&
% Dev.a
Dev. = ( ^SL) 100
(Must be <1Q%)
-------
Date
/* -tf -
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
rrtMAe —
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature,
Sample bag leak checked
^^
Sample train leak checked
in.Hq
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
in.H20
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Dev.
ft/-/)
H: //-//./*
It \i?-H\i I-
X -
*.c '/*>/)
*% Dev. = (-
Q - Q
-) 100
Average
(Must be <10%)
avg.
B-195
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
tl r'j
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
ff
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Stack temperature, °F
Tr V
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
''T'9
Time
(24-h)
11:11-
Traverse
point
I 'V (Ot-i )
"
M-S)
"
fei-s)
AP
in.H20
Q • Q
Dev. = ( ^-) 100
avg.
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Average
in.Hg
Dev.
(Must be <10%)
B-196
-------
Date
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Plant
>&**»-
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
1n.Hg
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
V?
Stack temperature, °F
Sample bag leak checked
Sample train leak checked
"avg
B-197
-------
SFg TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
-A?-re-
location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
Sample bag leak checked
Plant
Stack temperature, °F
Sample train leak checked
in.Hg
Time
(24-h)
Traverse
point
AP
in.H20
Rate meter
flow rate,
cmVmin
Dev.
te-i)
6-tf
&-
-------
Date
SF, TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
D
RUN NO.
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature, °F
Operator
T
Sample bag leak checked
(J
Stack temperature, °F
in.Hg
Sample train leak checked \^
Time
(24-h)
/:*>- //:»v
//:?« '/J
//*•&-//•&
Traverse
point
*-
-------
SF6 TRACER GAS BAG SAMPLING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
Date
Plant
Sampling location
Barometric pressure
*>*? fw)
M)
Rate meter
flow rate,
cm3/min
Dev. =
Q - Q
av9
-) 100
*avg.
Average
(Must be y
e+JZ**^
r*4t.
B-200
-------
Client tos
f»N
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Date
Analyst
Calibration number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
SM PL. t- PLATFW n ( /» /^ /s / f^ r)
^no/ary L'lHflmT OncT
Pk -1*
PR.~ /B
^A - ^^
^/^-«?C
r R • 3 fl
M-3/0^
pK-^n
PR- V6
Atten.
/
/
2
A
2
0.
V
V
?
?
Peak
Height
/SL
/a-3
C.I
HI
S'35"
595-
^0
10
:r?r
£(?.5
Response
/2.
/*-3
I?**
^^
107
If 9
3s?
35 9r
V7A
y?^
Concen-
tration
v/v
^C^/^'/;>
t-CX/O'1*
0.\».&.
0. w. ft..
0.IAJ.K-
0.IAJ.A
l*lK\0^
2.9LH/0~1
707 X /O"'
3-/y < /o"1
OP
-------
Client
PN_
a I to It
LABORATORY DATA
Analytic
Analyst
Calibration Number HL -H> -|
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
PR- rr
Pk'lT
PK -7T
PK'ZT
PR-I
rn-io
PR.- n
PR'I^
Atten.
IL
Ib
It,
11,
3^
33-
32-
3^
Peak
Height
90
70S
&f.S
7/7. r
vr
yv .5-
u
vv
Response
mo
II 2 1
III3L
112.2
/yvo
/y/4
/V7^
/voo
:oncen-
tration
v/v
?'« */0"y
£.M*rc~*
C-tZXfD*
6f?*to'1
9.(2X(0~1
ff ,fr* ^o"f
f.3yx/o"7
f.tYxio'*
3-202
-------
Client _Jii
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Oite
Analyst 6/tfc'G
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
At ten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
(LPft - I
J-fstx/
cm -
CPfi ' 3
I.OO
CPfl
S3L
cm -c
/66V
/A/
- 3
3*
1.07*10'*
32
/. 7
to
"9
32.
ICJ3L
B-203
-------
Client _JiL
Analyst
UBORATORY DATA
Analysis
Calibration Kuaber
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
:oncen-
tration
v/v
0*CT
'3.0
-\3
- /
-------
Client
PN
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
Date
Analyst 6ft te 6 n
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
At ten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
AC.-I
32,
113 (
-3
35L
Usxto't
5TV. 7
1.60*10
-&
/77f
103*.
1710
i.ni
(AtJ
' 3
35.
HO
B-205
-------
Client t/fs fe'/v? / fi
4ABORATOKY DATA
Analysis
Date
Analyst
Calibration Hunter A* Va -fa.
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SFg TRACER
Sample I.D.
At ten.
Peak
Height
Response
:oncen-
tration
v/v
/9c/3 -
VOIQ
-/
11,
- c\ - 1
ILK
ftgo
V7
33-
33.
Ml
V7-3
istz.
t.
32.
Ik
It*
/67V
73
n
33.
77, r
-3-
3V. 7
7733
/67S-
ut,f/T
/(.Xt
re/1-/
2*5-
-------
Client
PN 3VJP-? Date
Analyst
MOMTORY MTA
Analysis
Calibration HuBbar
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D
At ten.
Peak
Height
Response
concen-
tration
v/v
SO
/too
-3
SO
/t>0t>
/?££'-/}/-•/
ft,
ii n
11
H*
70
//a?
- 1
70 .4
f/30
Ik
?/•*
ri
7/a.
6 -29 x
IL
161?
ins
13-51
72-
: - ni-l
f.aox
~ QI-3
isn
/
32
- 03 •/
Jb
7/
61-7
H7.1
It,
71
-------
Client
US •;//! / /? ?/?.
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
PN ?V
Date
Analyst
Calibration Number
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
A UK'S
Sample I.D.
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
7
41
S'.Sy/e'
L' Tf nnu IT
-9
-A/- 6
YO
j. 00X10*
30
/3
3 ^L
V/-7
y/.r
7777
33-
3/
ft*
3P-
1 Li'l "'
/ 7 / o^-
6'
C ?' 6
ro
it, oo
cy- r
'
C
-6
B-208
-------
Client _kl
PN^2±L
Analyst
LABORATORY DATA
Analysis
15- -
Calibration Number /3~f)-%2
AIR SAMPLE ANALYSES
SF6 TRACER
Sample I.D.
Atten.
Peak
Height
Response
Concen-
tration
v/v
3P-
0 1 - 4,
0
/j- 6> V
Ml-
L/0/O
OFF
t
-76
77
B-209
-------
B-210
-------
-------
Mlllll'Himui HIM Illilllll Mill riTTTIITITIIIIfTTlllTTIiriTTtirnhliil-llllllll-m
111111111111111111111111111111 Mj>l tf Kidu 11 n 111111111111II1111 n 11111111111 ii 1111111 M 111 n
-------
rrrTTTtinnnrnnn-ffhnnmTr.
-------
-------
-------
i I I : 1_LLL ,.' ' ...'_!...' ...'-1-. ' '....•_!_'_' .
-------
-------
-------
-------
Ut £Pf\ A*A* C6
LABORATORY DATA
Bottle Volume:
Analyst
Gas Change Time
Initial Cone. (Co) '•
SF6 CALIBRATION BY
EXPONENTIAL DILUTION
O.Shi
-N
C • C0E
Time
Time
(Decimal)
N
(TD/TGC)
Atten
Peak
Height
Response
Cone
5" /A
ST/3.
77, a
IT/A
7^.7
rr.3
At. lit
17,101
i
f.Silt
futo'*
1C
^' 7
y/7
/a.
/J
/r
17
1.91* to'u
H
3.61 mo
-II
ar
it,
S-'Jff
10
/9
B-220
-------
100,000
10,000
w
I
to
K)
1000
100
10
TYPICAL WORKING RANGE
-10
10
-9
SF6 CALIBRATION
RUNS *1 & 2 12/13/82
BAKED OUT 12/12/82
I
I
m = .92924198
b = 10.606476
r = .99998
10" 10
SF6 CONCENTRATION, v/v
-7
10
-6
10'
.-5
Example SFg calibration curve
-------
w
I
M
to
ro
1,000,000
100,000
10,000
. 1000
100
10
I I
io-13 io-'2
11 ]0-10 10-9 1Q-8
SF6 CONCENTRATION, v/v
10"7 10'6
10
-5
Example SFg calibration - full scale
-------
S02 ~ CEM DATA AND EXAMPLE
STRIP CHART PRINTOUTS
B-223
-------
Operation
PnOOCOS DATA
Date
Page
of
Observer
Pf M
Co
±
G
^T
rr
ZC.L&.
-£
ILL
'4*4
?.zl
22.
96,0
ll.
/S
4-3Z
222.
122.
LO
Ik
7g2^
\1 '
Mi
y^-^4
6*7
g^.^
/8V 2.
JL
JLJL
Hi'
AS
29
z^L
•1^20
9.^7
777-6
£,6
/
1*8
B-224
-------
Plant
City 7/Oc.o/?//?
Operation
DATA
7
Date
Page
Observer
of
/'/«
. t
30:4$
2?
lit
It,
14. Og
1 '30
M./6
1 17
2/.S7
2Z-
2.2 :
: if
B-225
-------
Plant
City //
-------
A
o+*~4 >L~
PWW55 DATA
Plant /HS/0&CO
City
» A
Operation Con/MET?Ff7? 7 L^L
/)/? 6t
"XT^"
Date
Page
''2-
of
Observer
C
onvr??
Xl.r
Cw.»-
TUrvj l?t. W.
£0
TU a
-II
28
-fZS
Co
a
AT
to ^(>
'It-
>7Z7
(K
1 o :
o
L.
,'/ ' OO
Co U /Ue/,
IK
14,'
> 1 o \o
i-o
20
/I
r &,
l^^ry^/kS^l / UH
:_f^
70
3.2.
-------
Plant
City'
Operation (^
PKS6ESS DATA
.^ '-,...
Date
Page /
Observer
of 3
' l?c-
pf «
I-/.
21-44
97
1'-, "- C Q-;
-2/.TJ
14.'
10
lot
//•T.Z
. . ,
I1' 5, t^- L \jurfr-*'
Lt.
2-3
43. Z
C
12:14
/J
2:22.
.
3Z
13:* 8
It, U
il'/l
S'a? C
13.
13
r. -' it-
//f
1.0
7.
Ct', \'j-tA
'
-------
Plant
City~
W8W5S DATA
Operation
T? 7
3^:
T* ^1**
Date
Page
Observer
of
3
J Ll.1 U-
-V.
M'
7?
2-
c -o^
IT-**
o
3/34
Uo
II'
/8-*y
J1Z.
'-* J 't^*.-
/li
lit'
3/
O2=_
Z3.37
7 S-
J±^
/•A-
c
a.
x
0 2 •
Lo
*? '
3 :
^72.
l&o-o
c?
.gVUJ^A"
X^L
3^97.6
T7Z,
24 :?
27Z-
'11.
37.18
3 -2,
AM.,
n ?J
B-229
-------
Plant
City
A
Operation
S #
DATA
Date
Page
of
3
Observer
W,
I/O/
c '• ''IV- J,
7073
(9 6 • &D
07:10
14;
/••r
/./
6° : o
Jt
/?g4
6-0
. 6
Z.
B-230
-------
Plant
A
PflOCESS DATA
City //OCOA-/X?
Operation
7
fa
'•>,• '-f
WS)QV<
Date
Page
of
Observer
/
12^7
H
37^
ID. OS
"Ha^l
7/3
/I1,
W,
12
: '4
•51
7.
nv
"2 .
.,({>.
L
&•>(,
.3» -2.
' I (J
y.o
1.2?
_0-
T26
/?.
1*70
l+l'
/rV
/•A'
12.3
. Z
2
-------
A
UM IM
Plant HS/H&CO
City _j
Operation
7 CJMto ^ 1'
Date
Page
of 3>
Observer
pf
So
O'y .
\28
9%
//a.*
11-Bi
6
62
1.32
0*1:40
/k
609
24.32
I'U "' k C La
-C--
/-k
6-40
i J . 1 0
131-6
148
O L-CTL-O
lu
/i-i vfc.-' >: ' lO- -*-.». O-L-- '
1 o '. ? o
i 0-32.
2.
, of
/o '4°
3^-r 2,
1 : S <|
/fi
7' fc
o:\
I-U
0 f F S
J 2 .' 3 "2.
M,
q./z
Lo
.-•€ i
., I&HC
1372,
3:5.3
RJiouT
trt?
g.lt
Co lei
4 '
27
lii
23-5-2
o
Co- ^
1 IT.'ofe
3-232
-------
Plant
_
DATA
City
Operation Co/wr??TfT? 7
T£>
Date
Page
Observer
of
Ai
So,.
a*
4<>3
43.1^
Jk
13
dlL
rr~i
74
3.2^
53.
112.
±
Cc ,+*
,~ 11
14,
&(>(,
r
v-< *>
-7 :
IZj
78-4
to?
17:40
B-233
-------
P46MCS DATA
Date 1/20/B3.
Page _
\
of J
Operation
Observer
rl A.X i m u »\
lffo.%
123.2-
•;•<>*
21,
23
2U
6.77-
21
2C
213
//r. z
40.0
L/I/-. L,J.
36 3
11-0
/to. 8
Lo
26 <}
20 4
.. • & k, i
cn,
J7&
Uo
9.4*
112.
//
2)3
Ir
6*2-
, £0
X/l
itz-v
'24-
// '->
n i.-
LLd •?
//
2*110
&'/#
U
2o.o
/2.'2U
13*
Lo
3.0
0. <=}<*•
0.4$
* C k. Uw
14
/<> Zo
W
3-234
-------
PROteSS DATA
Date
Page
of
Operation
Observer
FLov.- l?c, W.
*/H
1/4
• (.
/(v
K'5?
lH-
L-*e~\ i "C.1. it ' k-t j_ A
0-32.
SB?
13
tt-Z
it, '-it
/I,
/2V
77
/5W
22.
^ZUZ-lS vCv>«^
cZjKL
H.'
23
C JscLf*^ -j . ) LfTLO
Lo
llx'
40 1
. 9
342,
42Z.B
pkm
0
/A'
szt?
. a
/fr'30
494.4
*??**
C*(J AJaf
B-235
-------
Plant
A
DATA
City~7/0co/;//?
Operation
7 Clfi
Date l/20/e
Page 3
Observer
of
/l.
13:22
OO'-ll
14
//.-$" 2.
a o
' 1 L
^22,
32-64
OO 1 (,
10.0%
(
oo '42
r i * £
Ljb-y fifs, \t\/
o o
10,0%
L Jr-fri^A Ic
/£?
'
o i :cro
14,
oi :
01 :i o
B-236
-------
DATA
Date
Page
of
Operation
Observer
Cl . /
'/f. H K. *C ivi
o 2 .
1 80
02.4
jlii.
//.&
UtL
75-2
Hi
£-0
U,
IS
•^ *-** =t •-
a
a,
^^
? -41
J
&&0.0
2,09
V 2 / . -6
0*7 '2°
O
^M.
364.Q
32,
tr
Jt
7^_L
&.OQ
SO
17*?
225-
330.4
9./Z.
^r
/&.
u <=>
B-237
-------
Plant /~iS/)/?eo
City
Operation
DATA
., „ -rrt
*4 CLetFGl'*
Date
Page
Z of 2
Observer
/l.r
Cw.>-
run... l?r UL
10-44
hi;
48
Cc/
A//
1 Jj. / c to
1 I . 0 1
i-k
&-80
//o
<(r^Sfr
M < ..'
C-o /UCH.I
I
20
o
2^^
Let o
O
o
A/,'
/777
5/2-
9.2^
72
43
1 7. 7J
3.
fad Out
CJ
-243
n.78
Co A/
V
Mi
/Iff
#64
J7.lt
B-238
-------
Plant
A
weets
Operation Co/W£7?rf7? 7 UbAftti uf
Date
Page 3_
Observer
of 3-
C
G leno
Lo
o
'30
/•if
169
/as
4*,. 8$
o 1
N
109
- (^U/LU-U
o
C.U/U --'
2T./4
7/4
/**, *^
' 32.
Lr ji ••)'?
14;
A41
14;
/ 6
4640
- JX
LC~t« >>C* r~B7j
#2-0
3,$^
U,
64.0
iW.fr*
Jf^M.
Kh
138
92
-5
B-239
-------
I I
I I I I) I I
CM«HTll GRAPHIC CDNTBCIS CDOPOatllDN BU'FALO. NfW VflBK
•» f • »
EXAMPLE S02 ANALYZER CALIBRATION
B-24Q
-------
f I ! If I I I I I I
1 I I I If M I I » I
•• _Jt « •»»••»»»! I I
EXAMPLE CHARGE, BLOW, AND SKIM CYCLES
3-241
-------
.->,
.£
-
_i
_J.^j
9
8
\ j
!
!
i
1
1
.
.
'
1
"
i M II 1 . ! M II 1
e.t>
1
"i
i
1
• ' 1 1
\
i
t
i i
i i
i ' i
.*
1
i
• 1 •
. . .^.
-
1 i ~>
1 • —
S7: : ;
. 4
^
:>::•
» i
'
•
1 1
'
' : •
.
. • •
.4-1 : i
- . . ;-
-_7ti
- — ~£
: I :
iii:
ty
jfv\
... \
, ...
itttt
:.z.
• • —
)•*"* .
' ' i
i
, . ! i
. 1 1 i
. - ; j
1
i
• • ' i
: : i s
l:i:
.?• :
:\ril
x-
;^t*:
... in
Ql
,
t .
J
J
•1
Mill
• '
.if
i
i-
^
fc*
-.-a.
(
....
?
<^ . .
, _, _ . _. . _
.
i
i . 1
t
: ! i
\
.1
i
-
f
I
]
~T~ i
M L i
!
\
:•
*
c
"'• • •
' ^ "1
'&
i
. . __
1:: \
^S
M
ll '/
..'. •"jiflV- •
!
i
- f- -~
1
1
: i
1 ...
' 1
• •iCOHDIIIO CHlBTII GRAPHIC CONTROLS CORPORATION BUFFALO. NFW vr.B
EXAMPLE STANDBY AND BLOW DATA
B-242
-------
S02 MANUAL TESTS
3-243
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA EPA METHOD 6 - DETERMINATION-OF SO2 FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
» CUT
I(l*l*l?J*l'l|*l||h>I'*l|l'*l"l||i|*N>|I"l>4'*l'tIi*I"l"I'iI|*I"l|'l"
wJbH ^fc«J»^fc^J^»J^^^^^»«L»A»A»-^^^^^i—»J»«A-»Ju—^»^-^A.j^—J i * -1 I*i
I I I I I I I I I I I I
MTf
|M|.t|nMli)»l.tFi
UMTtlK IOCAIIOM
• i i
uwtt rm
|'.K"I"MH"M"I'
•E
•KMTOfl
>|»l*l>*l"l'»l"J'4l"l'»l"
I 1 l l l I I l l I
HIV
cn
ness.
|i*.
)I|»|M|M
llHlMII
n|«i|«>[»[*i|«t |««|«r|4«[«t|M|\i[ty|M[vimt>|<"i M|M|»^H|
' * ' I ' l l l
' ' ' « ' ' I ' ' A I
' ' * ' l ' * ' ' ' '
UMM
tfi
i i i i i i i
^H|M|I^M|M[H|»I|M|H
A i VI I l l l l
Ml NO.
WHI
KIM.
"P't"
1 i
±1
J_L
4/
Ml II* CM.
r«*.f« V
If*. 4> |t«|«l
4±?»j
NUT Utl
•ICMD
M» HIM
SL ffi D 20 ED El D D C CD Q] d D3J D Q] CP 32 C m n n n m m en n n r~
I '" I
All!
HlH|i3Al4|>sP*T
»3|76]3lbl|ai 30l3tt3?|33n43nW)
3ii3»|40|4l
43143144143T44J4 7
»h>li^
ssli4l at
MADUG
ft'
STACK
mVCDATUM
MV CAS MCTKB
TtNrCMATUU
IT. i.»r
!•
/».<
fV
id.D
X^^
-*
-------
pusrt
M
IG
nM? t cut
i|*|'|*M'*l"l"l"l"l'>l'*l"l"l"H"l"M>>l"l"l'>l"l"l"
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
MTI
i«hsl)i|i>l)iln|I|MJ»I|U
vmm.
mmr
•KM1M
lt[llithihi|ii|«|ii|iihi|ii|iibolti|n|i^>«|n|it|>i
*±*f ' |L»I ' i ' ' ' ' I I ' I T I ' '
uH
' ' ' I « » ' I I I I I '
II
CM
RE
gs
m
MISS.
O*.
>i|n|n|n
^gjo
1 1 i
r
J_L
ywnt
i i i i i i.|
ls|M|lr|M|» «>|«||«>|«)[4«[4S j««|»t|4l|<«m>l|t>|M|M|t\}M"[ti
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
m
II MMIItlltf
ga
i 1 1
EE
nm
ICKTM MB Iff!
T
Iwurt
win
mw
mm CM.
r~-.TOI T
1101 Mil
•tOM
MU HIM
J2L.
I I A I A I I
I<170|7<
3»|3»|40|4I
43l4a]44|45l44j4y
81|S>TS4
S?
«M NCtU MAOUIQ
y/.
STACK
OUT CAS MCTKK
TCNriMTUU
IT i.«r
in
. V
An
-T77 .
^.
o
01
4-JU
1 III
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA EPA METHOD 6 - DETERMINATION OF SO2 FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
1MT I Cltt
ifll I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Mfl
UMfllW IOCAIION
•» «ita " I««I«'I««M«M'
ortMin
CM
WWPII T«H
I I I I I I
MISS.
(I*. H,|
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A I I 1 I I A I I
I I
MCI
U
I
ro
fO*
< O
6V
52-
76)
6 oo .
4/^.opz:
-------
•• •
I i
1 1
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA EPA METHOD 6 - DETERMINATION OF SO2 FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
MMT t CIH
mTmf "TT^^r' T t I "^ ^"T I I I I I ' m ' T"T 'T "1" 1"'f "I f" T* T t' 'T '1 T ''
• I 11111«|»11111111 |..|.i|u|.,|,.|"l"l"H'»N"l"N"l"l»l"l"l"H "l"l»
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
MU
SMFlIM IOUIIOM
s
im
>l"l"|Hhl.«l»|MUI.
i ' ' ' ' » ' i L
IM «.
OfCMIQI
ii|iihi|i)|i«lit|ii|ii|ii|iibo|;i|)t|id>4|n|>i|)i
m*^^^m*+f^L—i,^^^L*^»^m*i^*^^JL~jL~^^mJ-~i+~~l—^i—±~
.11
IIW
(•ri
MCSS
^ITCT?
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I
mm MO im
.|i|.|«|.|«l»l*l«M..bi|..H'»M..|..|..-
S^tt i6/iAiSt<>i i i
vurti
!MI NO
WIU
Ml 10.
ifl|ti|n|»ijn
n|u|n|ti|>i|i«|ii|n
"N»
A 1 1
Mltl CM.
r~-|«l T
"r
A 1
EE
A I I 1
HUT Ml
li
Tip1:
£E
KCOM
MM MM
IV|IO|3I
30J3Ii3a|3 3|34| J 5l3«|37J
ii)3»]40i4l
42l43l44l4Sl4«i47
33 I S4
saistl si
STACK
TCHTCHATUU
PUT CAS NCTCB
TCNPCMTUMC
ll
/O .0
/Of
,3,0
-------
EMISSION TESTIN
i cm
i|i|.NI«|i|.|.|»|..|»|..|..|..|.»|u|.>|..|..N"l»N»l»*M»l"NM|..|..|..
11 i i i i i t i i i i » i i
MM
UMTlIM IOUIION
33
»i 11 11
tm
ijit|'i|'i|'4|n|'«|"l'«l"l«
I I I I I I I I I
OHMIM
I I 1 M i I
UNF
Cf)
MISS
II*.
»'l"l"l»
»|n|ir|n[iT
l|4/|4»|44l" H«'1«»M*H"1"I*1"1"1" ^{iC[tll.7|
'I I I A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IfMTM
i i iTi/l/i
I I I 1 I A
UMVII
'•01 NO.
1 I I I I I A I
WIM
A I I A
MIM Ui.
,«MO« T
•II^M
' ^ ' ' ' * ' ' M
Misfit
NUI UT
ffi
I4fr5ll6l
-f
'M"!'
i i
Mtf
•tton
MI* HIM
lt|ll|ll|l
»S
3«I39|4Q|4I
"I»als4
salS4l ay
TMB
A5^T^c
STACK
ItttftMTUU
OUT CAS MCTEB
TCMrCMTUftC
&
63
(O.O
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA EPA METHOD 6 - DETERMINATION OF SO2 FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
PIMT » til?
33
IllttlUllI Hllllll
Illll
rOtllllfllllMlltlltllri
i i i i i i i
ertMtw
rn
MISS.
IOUIIOM
ywni Tm
I A 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
A I i
im
urn i
!MI NO.
I A
MTU CM.
t~-.TOI I
iffl
I I I
ffi
i I A I
IMII
101 Ml
.1 MM* Ml«l
til
n|n|M|n
PME
?S?7
HUM)
MM HIH
yjITfTio iiimi3Ti4ftsn»T
Ifl20m i 22|23|24
2a|2*j2rt2>l21 30plj32|33|l4l35i3<|3>
3ft|3»|40|4l
52I53IS4
17
•TfcCE
ttMTCMTU
MV CAS MCTM
TtMrtKATUU
IT. t.-r
IM»IMCOI
!•!
•r
I
to
-------
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY RESULTS
C-l
-------
PARTICULATE
C-2
-------
BLANK ANALYTICAL DATA FORM
Plant
0
Sample location f/)COn/3 fifR C a/? 7/9/A/ G*HA«<>T
Relative humidity
Liquid level marked and container sealed J/
Density of acetone (pa) .j90%
Blank volume (Va) CWT• # YZQafi / C T ' J36 I
_g/ml
ml
,
3-7C.>*»
Date and time of wt 2/7/P3 & i?930 Gross wt /Q 3
Date and time of wt «?//? y /&^ ^7/3^ Gross wt
fi -'nig /Q ^ ^ p 7 /}
J
'mg
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Weight of blank (ma)
/Q
'mg
_mg
mg
m.
va Pa
0.
mg/g
Note; In no case should a blank residue greater than 0.01 mg/g)
or 0.001% of the blank weight be subtracted from the sample
weight.
Filters Cf»~.ft
Filter number
170 > 9
379.?
mg
Date and time of wt 3///g3- @0?C>6 Gross wt
Date and time of wt 3-/
-------
Plant
METHOD 5 TRAIN ANALYTICAL PARTICULATE DATA
Run No.
Sample location
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
A/e . i
g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
v/
tec
Liquid level at mark
and/or ^container sealed
•/
Y££
Acetone rinse container no.
•
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
CT-
ml
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca) Q, &
Wa = Ca Vaw pa « (.0/0 ) Ui'4~ ) ( 7^tf ) « <,", c
Date and time of wt ^/f/g"> @. 0?3O Gross wt
Date and time of wt "Z//cfe~i P. @%1>O Gross wt
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa) £
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse /O/.g y
Filter(s) container no.
Date and time of wt A
Date and time of wt
mg/g
mg
& O9oo
fi o9o°
lFH-Tt-*> -ft-
Gross wt
Gross wt
6 ?£
mg
mg
J7
mg
'mg
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Weight of particulate on filter(s)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total weight of particulate
/?/.
mg
Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (.01 mg/g) or
.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample
weight.
Remarks:
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-4
-------
Plant
METHOD 5 TRAIN ANALYTICAL PARTICULATE DATA
Run No.
Sample location
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
/\Jo-
St-ICbN QfifiY
g/mi
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
i/
K^-6
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
i/
Yt'S
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
G/O
ml
- 0/0
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa «= (.0/v ) ( f- to ) ( -7^2 ) « ¥.
Date and time of wt .?/>/(? 3 & O95O Gross wt
^^^^ "~ —
Date and time of wt
mg/g
/ mg
X,
mg
/&
^
Gross wt j.Dtr5^.J
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filter (s) container no. $ £ yt/ I /AJ^ C T"
~tng
V.g>
mg
mg
time of wt £///? 3 $ OJoc Gross wt
time of wt ?/s/?3 £) Ofoo Gross wt
' / C-^"
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Weight of particulate on filter (s)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
t17,l -• mg
V/7'/ "'' mg
V^7 / "^'mg
J ? ?. ? ^mg
/3i?- P-^mg
&9.(/ " mg
Total weight of particulate o?P7-6_ mg
Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (.01 mg/g) or
.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample
weight.
Remarks:
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-5
-------
METHOD 5 TRAIN ANALYTICAL PARTICULATE DATA
Plant
Run No. PfiTC. -
Sample location
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
N* i
g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
V
n^
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
i/
n-*
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
ml
.0/0
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa « ( .0/0 ) (V/o ) ( -7W* ) « 3^
Date and time of wt _ ;7/?/f 3 <& o??C> Gross wt
Date and time of wt
mg/g
mg
0%3O
Gross wt
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filter(s) container no. T&,siLflfcft CT- YS6/ !-/<-Tt'*. it
Date and time of wt Z///Z 3 (p O900 Gross wt
Date and time of wt
7/27
35"
mg
'.
-------
METHOD 5 TRAIN ANALYTICAL PARTICULATE DATA
Plant
Run No. PA
Sample location
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
Mo. y
7o
g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter(s)
Sample
identifiable
i/
Yi/s
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
(/
Yes
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
ft I
ml
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa «= (.C-IO ) C/3* ) ( .7?C?) •=
010
mg/g
-'ing
Date and time of wt
Date and time of wt
'-') &
^^—
Sl//e/z'i ,/
Gross wt
Gross wt
/c>2
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filter (s) container no. 57,7^ /Lt)A# C T-W3/F"*TC'**
Date and time of wt 3/i/Z3 P. O9a0 Gross wt
T 1^ ^^
Date and time of wt «V//f ? £> O90Q Gross wt
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Weight of particulate on filter(s)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total weight of particulate
7O/.J
/p*
"3 . <-/
•^ ng
/ing
>
/mg
;_'' mg
' mg
9
lit-?,
mg
Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (.01 mg/g) or
.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample
weight.
Remarks:
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-7
-------
METHOD 5 TRAIN ANALYTICAL PARTICULATE DATA
Plant
Run No. PflTC -3
Sample location -r/Kin/3 Me. V £t:JiMK?
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter(s)
Sample
identifiable
J
V^S
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
•/
hf<,
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
C.T-
¥00
ml
Acetone blank residue concentration
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = ( ^/,
Date and time of wt
Date and time of wt
(Ca)
.0/0
mg/g
mg
Gross wt
Gross wt
Jo ty
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filter (s) container no. y//7/
Date and time of wt
Date and tine of wt
0%?:l '
/Of
mg
,s
3$~3C>
-------
METHOD 5 TRAIN ANALYTICAL PARTICULATE DATA
Plant
Run No./)/9<:/1 -3
Sample location fft ton ft
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
/
J
Yii<>
Liquid level at nark
and/or container sealed
S
Yt-s,
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
/ cr~
'.0/0
Wa = Ca Vaw pa -= ( .
Date and time of wt
Date and time of wt
) (
) ( .
)
_ _
p/f/?3 ^5 093O Gross wt //?/
P//Q/ZJ (& O&3O Gross wt /0*J
_ mg/g
•'mg
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
/^ L/
mg
?
mg
Filter (s) container no. */2C3 /{./)£ & CT- ift/l j pit-Tun. 4- if
Date and time of wt
Date and time of wt
(£>
Gross wt
Gross wt
-1 - ">9
393- I
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Weight of particulate on filter(s)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total weight of particulate
33.3
mg
^
m
Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (.01 mg/g) or
.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample
weight.
Remarks:
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-9
-------
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
C-10
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Run No. PS ft "I bLflWK
Sample location
/L/- V
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
6. We
_g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter(s)
Sample
identifiable
,/
,/
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
J
t/
Acetone rinse container no .
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
V / 7 7 /9
Lab no.
inl
0.0 IP
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa «= (£.010) ( iytj ) (s.tfeft = /. /
Date and time of wt «?/?//3 /P. 23'3O Gross wt //Q 3-3(J.3
I i
Date and time of wt 3/tf/f 5 (£? 9$ 1C* Gross wt
mg/g
mg
//#
mg
Average gross wt_
Tare wt_
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)_
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filters
Stage Filter No.
mg
//3 /V3 g 113-J -0-1'.
Cf- IC•
cT-3a<~ fj?>1 /V? V -5.A'-
Cl'3d& /£?'6 I&2-G O'C)'
Cl-307 if3 O 1*3- 0 0-0 -
C7-J09 3/9,0 217. ? /'2
P/^,3
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
c-li
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Run
Sample location
L/
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
_g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter(s)
Sample
identifiable
I/
i/
Liquid level at nark
and/or container sealed
I/
S
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
Lab no. Cr-¥/?
ml
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca) QmQ I 0
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = (fl.r-io ) (-^V ) (O.l-^) = ,
Date and time of wt 2/?/<<'<. $ ft?30 Gross wt
ng/g
/mg
mg
Date and time of wt x//://3
^2 Gross wt ffO 7/?,'? l mg
Average gross wt //fl ~$l ?>0 * mg
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)_
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse_
Filters
Stage Filter No.
Yf 0
I/O ?/// •' mg
/. C " mg
£.3 '
mg
Lab No. Gross,mg Tare, mg Net, mg
2
3
4
5
'/ 7
^ Backup
Q--309
C7- 7/0
CT-3/1
C.T- 7/3L
flr. -
C7-J/4
C7•3/7
/40'V
3.~jQ' 6
f.
142. I
5". 3
AT.
Height of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer_
C-12
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant fit ft A CO
Run No.
. 'Sample location
/(Jc
Relative humidity :X
Density of acetone (pa)
jg/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
/
^
Liquid level at nark
and/or container sealed
,/
i/
Acetone rinse container no .
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
/ 7 ? /9
Lab no.
// £->
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = (.£/{•• ) (//£ ) (.7?'1£) c
Date and time of wt .,7/V?* /£? /?^3^ Gross wt
£jnl
.010
0.1
Tare wt //?/ ^
Less acetone blank wt (Wa) ^7.
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse Q'• ^
Filters
Stage Filter No. Lab No. Gross,mg Tare, mg
0
CT-JJfc
2
AT-
» c
?7t:-7 •*
777^ 6
377' 7
777^ Backup
6J-/57
/W-f
/.•s'J V
A/4/
/J7
AT -
319.3.
mg/g
Date and time of wt 3//4/?J fi JglC* Gross wt /?/ $>£%
Average gross wt /Qj (->%
ing
Net, mg
3.3-
1-3
S-S
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
73
(?. <
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-13
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Run
Sample location Tnc.QKA No V
Relative humidity
lo
Density of acetone (pa)
_g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter(s)
Sample
identifiable
/
i/
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
I/
^
Acetone rinse container no. 4"/ 7-?
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw) //3 ^
Lab no. CT-J3.1/
jol
•010
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = ( >0\b ) ( i)3 ) (-7^) = 0. 1 -
Date and time of wt 2/?/«3 & o93O Gross wt /0f 7~32..
mg/g
/
mg
Date and time of wt 2 //•'>/?'
Gross vt
Average gross wt
Tare wt_
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)_
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
7^ £3
mg
3-3
mg
Filters
Stage Filter No. Lab No. Gross,mg Tare, mg Net, mg
A/-/ -il £7- 3*3 777,2. /£ 7
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant ftsftRC.0 __ Run No.
Sample location r/9co/1/3 A/0 H
Relative humidity 3^ /<;
Density of acetone (pa) 0 • ~~lCtctf
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter(s)
Sample
identifiable
V
J
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
i/
i/
Acetone rinse
Acetone rinse
Acetone blank
Wa = Ca Vaw pa
Date and time
Date and time
container no. *S/ ?2- tf
volume (Vaw) //!? ^
residue concentration (Ca)
= (-C'lO ) (11* ) (.7?W) «
of wt 3/?/s3 P. 0?3& Gross wt
of wt 2 //c>f? 3 K 0t~$° Gross wt
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filters
Stage Filter No. Lab No. Gross, mg
Lab no.
ml
.010
0.1
fal . 0 -
W 1 /3fi
r.o^2 £z-
?*3 3 br-
"f.:1) 4 y3w~
-7? . CT-311 HC=-%
-63 cr-37.2. iGf-?
13- LT-'J7~5 /J^.Pv
-J5" r.r- J?y /r/C-6
/y&-ls •
/s j. y
/J7 • y
fsa.g
6 O -•
//. y -
y.v •
?..>?-
s'~?5 CiT'iH (..T-Trtr /32-Y tjf'f j-£)*-
PPi 6 f$fi-£3 C-f-3fte f&t-C) f$J $ y> Q ~
'^77 _b^-0f> ^.7"--?fZ r!9. Y fJ'Lf ¥-£~ "
^Backup /3-f>"^/ r T-itZ ?.?&(> ^y^-^- V-1/ '
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse .?-"?
Total C
Signature of analyst
S
Signature of reviewer
C-15
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant nsRRCd __ Run No./W
Sample location TfiConft NO j $U'
Relative humidity_
Density of acetone (pa) 0- i t£ 07 W " mg
Date and time of wt •?/£/?3 ^7 ^/JO Gross wt
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa) / 0 - mg
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 9- - */ ' mg
Filters
Stage Filter No.
o
1
2
3
5- 4
3 5
6 fi>LL ~
Lab
CT-i
No.
Gross, mg
lt,o 7 •
Tare, mg Net,
if? 7 /i.o
mg
C.T if1-? H7. h iij y~ s"- V •'
CT-
CT'~
y//^
•///
Ho. Q
rtt-Ji
IJif. lc • V ?•
sn 2 2 y
'v, •
.
cr-f/z 113. i i-tf. C, J-/ --
cr-
CT-
CT-
C-7 -
y/j
y/y
y/r
y/f
I3?.k
/VCj(o -
/37V
237.? •
/P?.7 J?. ?
/ J / • 7 / • c^-
/3*.f • y-6
3o~} v • ^r
^
-
^
•*•
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
Signature of analyst
^\~^ r^1 • / //
Signature of reviewer J^<- £JL..\^\uJct (ML-
C-16
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Run
Sample location Tfl cof\ A
. Y £> /y/? » m'g
__^ mg
^ - s
3
4
5
733 7
-Backup
C.7-7/?
cr- 3^^:
9
II
/3 g-- 9 v
AC- yf
^- /
A-
CT-
IHl, 4
? ,0 ? .
^
y . a.
ZC-7'
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-17
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant ft Sfl ft CO
Run No.
Sample location^
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
l\Jp. H
Ci
' '°
0 •
g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
J
i/
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
/
j
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
$0
Lab no. C.T
10 J l/
. o
mg/g
0.?
mg
mg
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = ( .-c/c ) (/ QUO Gross wt
.. T[
Date and time of wt .?//*/>? P, 0?3O Gross wt /&ty 12 £2 - rog
/ .
Average gross wt /OJ j'2 f.7-'" mg
Tare wt_/^/ ^ S.7
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filters
/
/),?
mg
/
mg
Stage
775-31
?7? y 2
77 i- r 3
37?£ 4
j>7?7 5
37£?6
3??? 7
-? 7 ff Backup
Filter No.
&F-7C
Lab No. Gross,mg
cr- ~>i
Tare, mg
/f,z.y.
Net, mg
7.7 ,
6 -//
CT-3Yf
CT-350
CT-^iTl
767.
cr- J*~J
177-1
Ibl.O
211. (r
* V
04.7
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
s
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-18
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant /95/9^w Run Ho.Ps5S'3
• Sample location TflCQtifi /I/?, tf <,£co/vj)fi#r t^XilfttflT
Relative humidity i>i 70
Density of acetone (pa) '• • n^x g/nl
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter(s)
Sample
identifiable
•/
\/
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
V
L/
Acetone rinse container no. *// ?f // Lab no. C.T'-
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw) l^1-/ ^ ml
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca) #/0 mg/g
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = ( ^l!: ) ( /yy ) ( 7/Y£ ) e /. / "' ^_mg
Date and time of wt 3/9/?'j &2 093° Gross wt
Date and time of wt 2//a/f 3 P. 0??° Gross wt /Ol
/ / '—•'
mg
Average gross wt /OI ?{2.7 "'mg
j
Tare wt //?/ y?%3 ^ mg
Less acetone blank wt (Wa) /- / - mg
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 3-3 " mg
Filters
Stage Filter No. Lab No. Gross>mg Tare/ mg Net, mg
1 AF- OJ C~--J->3 13d-I
2 /?»f'-_22__ c7-?;-7 /V,?-g>
10 cr-'J7i~ fl^.3. '33 7 /_
4 n>n - n t-r- ??£> /'•
6 Af-,' y3 r r- 37% SVC-i /£•?• «/ '? O -
A/T - IT V <^r> 11? /Tjr.Z. I'7-P, /<"'• J '
_ C.T- *?Q itb 3. /?&.
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Sample location 7flt.0nfi A/a. V St
Run No.
Relative humidity
^1- /c
Density of acetone (pa)
a/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
i/
\/
Liquid level at mark
and/or container sealed
l/
i/
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
b A
Lab no. CT-
"77- *
at-01
ml
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = (.0/0 ) (?2£ ) (Ti'"l) =
Date and time of wt J/-J//3 & 0:':O Gross wt
.010
_mg/g
/- £.
' mg
I/O 6^(>3 L mg
Date and time of wt 2/W71- P. o?3i> Gross wt I/O 03.6.Y " mg
Average gross wt
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filters
I/O 03 L
/Of ?$
/\y
• 0
?,*/ v mg
~£2 ' »g
1 mg
Stage
.?i- 0
^ 1
37^7 2
Filter No.
- 07
Lab No.
C7-327
Cr-33?
Gross,mg
/ST- y
Tare , mg
37/f 4
37 ff> 5
L-T-33&
/5V.
CT-33
Backup
(.T-33i
IZ.I ,Q
nt
Net, mg
/- 3- -
0-3 -
0,L •
/.^L
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
C-20
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Run No.
Sample location
/1/v V ?1O Gross wt
Average gross wt_
Tare wt_
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)_
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse_
Filters
Stage Filter No. Lab No. Gross,mg
.0(0
jng/g
mg
mg
7 C,
mg
/.
mg
W.
mg
3773 0
?77%. I
Net, mg
/£>
/£,? I
* ' S X
?7 s /Backup
c r- JA a
J-O
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
Signature of analyst_
Signature of reviewer
C-21
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Run No.
Sample location
Relative humidity
Density of acetone (pa)
g/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
t/
\.'
Liquid level at nark
and/or container sealed
i'
\/
Acetone rinse container no. L//?3 A
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw) /%*} '
Lab no. £7~-
t/2£.
S ml
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = ('CiiO ) (/?/ ) ( 11o%)
Date and time of wt 2/J/f3 {&). 093°
Date
and time of wt ^"///y/f 7 f) O
Average
Less acetone blank
B
Gross wt
Gross wt
gross wt
Tare wt
wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
.010
/, S' -
//557" ^7;^/
/^f ^7^
JC>$ 0700
/./?£"" ^/^1.3
/. r -
tr P ~2.
-J (> * **1^
mq/q
•/'
mg
.- mg
-mg
x
"mg
s
mg
mg
Filters
Stage Filter No.
•?f o r\r~^i
2
3
4
Lab No. Gross,mg Tare, mg Net, mg
e.T'3?t
c r-
y-
AT- .CS
C. T- ??V
/yp-f
J^2-&
J ?•/.'- 7
/; Backup
v o
2 Of- 2-
303.
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Total
Signature of analyst.
Signature of reviewer
C-22
-------
ANDERSON IMPACTOR ANALYTICAL DATA
Plant
Run No.
Sample location
/-'/
Relative humidity
i-
Density of acetone (pa)
a/ml
Sample
type
Acetone rinse
filter (s)
Sample
identifiable
i/
i/
Liquid level at nark
and/or container sealed
i/
v/
Acetone rinse container no.
Acetone rinse volume (Vaw)
Lab no.
Acetone blank residue concentration (Ca)
Wa = Ca Vaw pa = (.O'C ) (211 ) (7?-?) -
Date and time of wt 2J?/? 3 h) 0 j 3C> Gross wt_
Date and time of wt 2//[>/?3 £) QZ5O Gross wt
.0(0
ng/g
A 7
mg
1H.2* -mg
'mg
/. 7
Average gross wt /OQ 3 J(.->.
Tare wt
Less acetone blank wt (Wa)
Weight of particulate in acetone rinse
Filters
Stage Filter No.
?6 o
mg
"
mg
• 1
Lab No.
C.T-3??
Gross,mg
'•f
Tare, mg
/3C-76
130-3
130-3
I Yt>. 0
C '-
.0
•3
fc'V
Backup
Rl- - V3
C~-
/
-------
S02 MANUAL TESTS
C-24
-------
PLANT
SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYTICAL DATA
DATE
SAMPLE LOCATION /-
..,-^^ -
ANALYST
NORMALITY OF BARIUM PERCHLORATE 2
^L ml .irr^H N
3 & /.Q ml ifp%x' N
Run
No.
-,
_c_ ^
2
3
4
5
6
Sample
No.
^_^^c^.
_, C^ (> / i
<^A - ?^23
£*>*_- £fl-|
Total
volume
of sample
'
£S^*
/0ZXO
Sampl e
aliquot
t^_ji_
*^
2o
7^>
Vol ume
1st
titration
--44
1 ' i
f2.ir
O -3
of titrant \
2nd
titration
4- ~)
/• LS
/2.3
o.?C
't» ml
Average
•+-&£:'-
T •
'3*?f
O'tLt*
^'
Blank analysis - volume of titrant 1st titration
2nd titration
Average
2nd titration = °'99 to ^^ or lst titration ' 2nd ttfration = 0.2 ml
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer or supervisor
C-25
-------
PLANT
SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYTICAL DATA
DATE
SAMPLE LOCATION
ANALYST
<4 ml ,00°; 7 N
NORMALITY OF BARIUM PERCHLORATE 2 £?<2<5"~ml 0Otf£ N <6o?7N
Run
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sample
No.
M«k£0«
P£OZ- 1
-psoz- z-
p^o^-3>
"pS02-^
Total
volume
of sample
SW0.0/W
IfrZrO
too
/Oz>0
rcrr^>
3 ^C?/^m^ -ooc/k N
Sample
aliquot
x.o
^0
?.o
2.0
io
Volume of titrant Vt, ml
1st
titration
?o.?f
/.ir
/•7S~
3.?tT^
gf/<-
/.^r"
2nd
titration
2^,/
/C
t^ * f~)
/, ^"
^.%o
o.-<^
1.^
Average
^^.23
3pBfeS*V
J-T ^^V-'
5s. £^
5-.«
/.£^
Blank analysis - volume of titrant 1st titration ^-2^^.
2nd titration O, /
Average & . /*•>
2nd titration = 0>" to 1>01 or lst titration ' 2nd titration = 0.2 ml
Signature of analys
Signature of reviewer or supervisor
c-26
-------
SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT
DATE
i/n i n *
1//4/&
SAMPLE LOCATION
ANALYST
1
NORMALITY OF BARIUM PERCHLORATE 2
3
ml
ml
ml
N.
N
N
Run
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sample
No.
^02,-S-
$
(>•*
Average
r.t>
t-^>
Blank analysis - volume of titrant 1st titration
2nd titration
Average
2nd titration = °'99 to 1>01 or 1st titration - 2nd titration = 0.2 ml
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer or supervisor
C-27
-------
PEDCO ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
1 1499 CHESTER ROAD
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45246
(513)782-4700
TELECOPIER (513) 782-48O7
LABORATORY REPORT
U.S. EPA
ASARCO
PN: 3490-9
IPA Impingers
H2S04 Analysis
Sample ID
S02-BM-1
PS02-1
PS02-2
PS02-4
PS02-5
PSO2-6
PEDCO No
CT455
CT456
CT457
CT458
CT459
CT460
Total Sample
Volume, ml
164
92
98
163
120
127
H2S04,
Total mg
0.12
0.11
0.16
0.17
0.26
0.18
Normality of barium perchlorate - 0.0098425
Analyst:
Reviewer:
- 'J //*':..^
Date of Analysis: ^'tf-?
Date of Review: ^_ 9-65
IPA impinger 1-22-83 (CT482) and 2nd and 3rd impinger
water 1-22-83 (CT483) were not to be analyzed per M. Phillips,
BRANCH OFFICES
CHESTER TOWERS
DALLAS. TEXAS
KANSAS CITY. MISSOURI
COLUMBUS. OHIO
DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA
C-28
-------
LABORATORY REPORT
U.S. EPA - ASARCO
PN 3490-9
Process Sample Analysis
Sample
I.D.
CW852
CW853
CW854
CW855
CW856
o CW857
NJ CW858
w CW859
CW860 .
CW860R3
CW861
CW862
CW863
CW864
Sample description
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
(1/19)
(1/19)
(1/19)
(1/19)
(1/20)
(1/20)
(1/20)
(1/20)
(1/20)
(1/20)
(1/22)
(1/22)
(1/22)
(1/22)
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
- Charge
79
79
79
79
80
80
80
80
80
80
81
81
81
81
- cleanup blow
- 2nd blow
- 3rd blow
- 4th blow
- cleanup
- 1st blow
- 2nd blow
- 3rd blow
- 4th blow
- 4th blow
- cleanup
- 3rd skim
- 4th skim
- 5th skim
CW865 Reverberatory matte - composite as received
from ASARCO
Sample
weight, g
0.4895
0.6165
0.5549
0.5300
0.5027
0.5182
0.5072
0.5062
0.5044
0.5222
0.5138
0.4992
0.5063
0.5058
Arsenic,
mg/g
0.91
1.50
1.31
1.77
0.72
1.74
2.18
1.50
1.30
1.30
1.89
1.18
1.36
2.37
Lead,
mg/g
47.77
35.00
44.98
29.45
28.54
10.56
16.37
27.62
23.47
23.28
6.83
36.56
22.15
19.42
% by
As
0.09
0.15
0.13
0.18
0.07
0.17
0.22
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.19
0.12
0.14
0.24
weight
Pb
4.8
3.5
4.5
2.9
2.9
1.1
1.6
2.8
2.3
2.3
0.7
3.6
2.2
1.9
0.4973
7.01
29.86
0.70 3.00
(continued)
-------
PROCESS SAMPLE ANALYSIS (continued)
i
u>
o
Sample
I.D.
CW866
CW867
CW868
CW869
CW869R*
Sample description
Gibraltar concentrations
Lornex concentrates
El Indio concentrates
Le Panto concentrates
Le Panto concentrates
Replicate.
Sample Arsenic,
weight, g mg/g
0.2043 0.08
0.2200 0.80
0.2154 107.7
0.1993 111.3
0.2180 107.4
^/3_ f\
' ^: M/7 y/4f
Lead, % by weight
mg/g As Pb
0.39 0.008 0.05
0.32 0.08 0.03
0.90 10.8 0.09
1.30 11.1 0.13
1.34 10.7 0.13
7l<^<^
Date: May 2, 19831
T
-------
LABORATORY REPORT
U.S. EPA - ASARCO
PN 3490-9
Arsenic and Trace Metals Analyses of Method 5-108 Samples
Arsenic
Test No.
Blank
PASM-1
PASM-2
PASM-3
r PATC-1
» *
H PATC-2
PATC-3
Blank
PASM-1
PASM-2
PASM-3
PATC-1
PATC-2
PATC-3
(continued)
Sample
I.D.
430/448
442/449
443/450
445/451
445/452
446/453
447/454
430/448
442/449
443/450
445/451
445/452
446/453
447/454
Acetone/Filter,
mg
1.3
17.2
17.3
4.8
24.5
26.2
11.3
<0.7
32.9
35.4
13.8
53.4
58.1
25.6
Sample
I.D.
479
461
462
463
464
465
466
479
461
462
463
464
465
466
NaOH probe
rinse, mg
0.007
1.4
1.0
0.047
1.3
1.0
0.12
Lead
<0.06
0.07
0.23
0.06
0.35
0.39
0.12
Sample
I.D.
480
467
468
469
470
471
472
480
467
468
469
470
471
472
Back-Half,
mg
0.006
3.0
8.9
0.16
3.2
33.4
3.3
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
-------
Arsenic and Trace Metals Analyses of Method 5-108 Samples
Cadmium
Test No.
Blank
PASM-1
PASM-2
PASM-3
PATC-1
PATC-2
PATC-3
r
i
u>
to
Blank
PASM-1
PASM-2
PASM-3
PATC-1
PATC-2
PATC-3
(continued)
Sample
I.D.
430/448
442/449
443/450
445/451
445/452
446/453
447/454
430/448
442/449
443/450
445/451
445/452
446/453
447/454
Acetone/Filter,
mg
<0.001
0.64
0.33
0.06
0.91
0.58
0.123
<0.003
0.56
0.116
0.037
1.64
0.299
1.27
Sample
I.D.
479
461
462
463
464
465
466
479
461
462
463
464
465
466
NaOH probe
rinse, mg
<0.008
0.017
< 0.008
<0.008
0.028
0.016
<0.008
Selenium
< 0.0029
0.0042
0.0042
<0.0029
0.0235
0.0079
0.0042
Sample
I.D.
480
467
468
469
470
471
472
480
467
468
469
470
471
472
Back-Half,
mg
<0.008
< 0.008
<0.008
<0.008
< 0.008
< 0.008
<0.008
< 0.0029
2.90
0.0123
0.0260
2.58
0.0319
0.479
-------
n
u>
u>
Arsenic and Trace Metals Analyses of Method 5-108 Samples
Antimony
Test No.
Blank
PASM-1
PASM-2
PASM-3
PATC-1
PATC-2
PATC-3
Blank
PASM-1
PASM-2
PASM-3
PATC-1
PATC-2
PATC-3
Sample
I.D.
430/448
442/449
443/450
445/451
445/452
446/453
447/454
430/448
442/449
443/450
445/451
445/452
446/453
447/454
Acetone/Fil
mg
<0.002
1.76
2.69
0.478
2.51
5.38
1.12
<0.002
0.581
0.719
0.695
1.383
1.909
0.747
ter, Sample
I.D.
479
461
462
463
464
465
466
479
461
462
463
464
465
466
Reviewed by:
NaOH probe
rinse, mg
< 0.0023
0.0029
0.0198
<0.0023
0.0141
0.0233
0.0029
Bismuth
<0.0013
<0.0013
0.0031
<0.0013
0.0016
0.0078
0.0013 ^
^ff( , .1
nftwk
Sample
I.D.
480
467
468
469
470
471
472
480
467
468
469
470
471
472
MJUI^
Back-Half,
mg
< 0.0023
0.0039
< 0.0023
< 0.0023
< 0.0023
< 0.0023
< 0.0023
<0.0013
<0.0013
< 0.0013
<0.0013
<0.0013
<0.0013
<0.0013
Date: May 2, 198
-------
Matte Charge
PSMC-1
LABORATORY REPORT
U.S. EPA - ASARCO
PN 3490-9
Particle Size Fraction Trace Metal Analytical Results
Pb, mg As, mg Cd, mg Sb, mg Bi, mg
Se, mg
CT418/CT309
1st cut
CT310/CT312
2nd cut
CT313/CT317
3rd cut
o
i PAMC-2
*• CT421/CT336
1st cut
CT337/CT339
2nd cut
CT340/CT344
3rd cut
PSMC-3
CT424/CT363
1st cut
CT364/CT366
2nd cut
CT367/CT371
3rd cut
1.9
1.9
17.6
0.28
0.26
2.0
0.53
0.42
5.1
1.11
1.00
11.98
0.19
0.14
1.26
1.43
1.33
16.87
0.036
0.04
0.567
0.0045
0.0050
0.07
0.0082
0.0085
0.115
0.145
0.125
0.87
0.024
0.014
0.051
0.088
0.064
1.124
0.0359
0.0358
0.36
0.0093
0.0095
0.0609
0.0158
0.0135
0.135
0.0137
0.0078
0.0793
0.0026
0.0014
0.0136
0.0032
0.0021
0.0325
(continued)
-------
o
I
en
(continued)
Particle Size Fraction Trace Metal Analytical Results
Pb, mg As, mg Cd, mg Sb, mg Bi, mg Se, mg
Matte Charge (cont'd)
PSCM-4
CT427/CT390
1st cut
CT391/CT383
2nd cut
CT354/CT398
3rd cut
PSCM-5
CT429/CT408
1st cut
CT409/CT411
2nd cut
CT412/CT416
3rd cut
Slag Skim Mode
PSS-1
CT418/CT318
1st cut
CT310/CT321
2nd cut
CT322/CT326
3rd cut
0.06
0.72
1.9
0.66
0.51
2.6
0.63
0.89
11.9
0.60
0.61
3.02
0.41
0.53
2.76
0.28
0.34
4.94
0.0064
0.0064
0.015
0.0074
0.0039
0.0091
0.0050
0.0062
0.040
0.056
0.083
0.144
0.057
0.04
0.12
0.08
0.085
0.324
0.0184
0.0195
0.0377
0.0146
0.0103
0.0273
0.0133
0.0189
0.4303
0.0034
0.0031
0.0066
0.0056
0.0028
0.0125
0.0147
0.04
5.76
(continued)
-------
o
(continued)
Particle Size Fraction Trace Metal Analytical Results
Pb, mg As, mg Cd, mg Sb, mg Bi, mg Se, mg
Slag Skim Mode
(cont'd)
PSS-2
CT422/CT345
1st cut
CT346/CT348
2nd cut
CT349/CT353
3rd cut
PSS-3
CT425/CT372
1st cut
CT373/CT375
2nd cut
CT376/CT380
3rd cut
Blowing Mode
PSB-1
CT420/CT327
1st cut
CT328/CT331
2nd cut
CT332/CT335
3rd cut
0.75 0.36 0.0065 0.048 0.0191 0.0053
1.10 0.48 0.0094 0.079 0.0276 0.0055
16.0 4.58 0.127 0.65 0.478 0.0252
0.32 0.17 0.0019 0.022 0.0081 0.0020
0.45 0.19 0.0029 0.02 0.0093 0.0016
11.7 3.25 0.049 0.389 0.298 0.0329
1.36 0.39 0.0072 0.22 0.0202 0.0158
0.1 0.08 <0.0013 0.004 0.0025 <0.0012
0.7 0.65 0.011 0.042 0.0142 0.0045
(continued)
-------
(continued)
Particle Size Fraction Trace Metal Analytical Results
Pb, mg As, mg Cd, mg Sb, mg Bi, mg
Blowing Mode (cont'd)
PSB-2
Se, mg
0
1
U)
CT-423/CT354
1st cut
CT355/CT358
2nd cut
CT359/CT363
3rd cut
1.5 1.12 0.012 0.199 0.0364
0.53 1.62 0.0074 0.072 0.0189
4.7 15.04 0.0061 1.038 0.171
, /
Reviewed byt*X/ / £ ^ //-r •*<--<
May 2, 1983 J
0.0108
<0.0012
0.0023
-------
APPENDIX D
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
D-l
-------
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
This section describes the test methods, sampling equipment,
and analytical techniques used during this test program.
SAMPLING METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE AND ARSENIC
EMISSIONS
The following method was used during this test program.
Sampling procedures followed those described in Methods 5 and
108.* Tests were conducted to determine filterable particulate,
particulate arsenic, and gaseous arsenic emissions using a single
sampling train.
During each converter cycle two separate particulate/arsenic
sampling trains were run. One of the sampling trains was oper-
ated continuously during the converter cycle, except when the
converter was idle. The second sampling train was run only when
the primary hooding system had been removed (charging, slagging,
and pouring). A description of the sampling and analytical
procedures is provided below.
Sampling Apparatus
The sampling train used in these tests met design specifica-
tions established by the U.S. EPA and was assembled by PEDCo
personnel. It consisted of:
*
EPA Method 108 has not been proposed and is presently in draft
form.
D-2
-------
Nozzle - Stainless steel (316) with sharp, tapered leading
edge and accurately measured round opening.
Probe - Borosilicate glass with a heating system capable of
maintaining a minimum gas temperature of 250°F at the exit
and during sampling.
Pitot Tube - Type S pitot tube that met all geometry stan-
dards and was attached to the probe to monitor stack gas
velocity.
Filter Holder - Pyrex glass with heating system capable of
maintaining a filter temperature of approximately 250°F.
Draft Gauge - An inclined manometer made by Dwyer with a
readability of 0.01 inches H_O in the 0 to 10 inch range was
used.
Impingers - Six impingers connected in series with glass
ball joints. The first, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth
impingers were the Greenburgh-Smith design, modified by
replacing the tip with a 1/2 inch I.D. glass tube extending
to 1/2 inch from the bottom of the flask. The second
impinger was a Greenburg-Smith design with the standard tip.
Metering System - Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers
capable of measuring temperature to within 5°F, dry gas
meter with 2 percent accuracy, and related equipment, to
maintain an isokinetic sampling rate and to determine sample
volume. The dry gas meter is made by Rockwell and the fiber
vane pump is made by Cast.
Barometer - Aneroid type to measure atmospheric pressures to
±0.1 inch Hg.
Thermocouple - Type K thermocouple capable of measuring
stack gas temperature within 2 percent.
Sampling Procedure
After selecting the sampling site and the minimum number of
traverse points, the stack pressure, temperature, moisture, and
range of velocity head were measured according to procedures
described in the Federal Register.*
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods 1 through 4, July 1,
1982.
D-3
-------
For each sampling train approximately 300 grains of silica
gel was weighed and placed in a sealed impinger prior to each
test. Glass fiber filters* (3-in. diameter) were desiccated for
at least 24 hours and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg on an ana-
lytical balance. One hundred and fifty ml of deionized, dis-
tilled water was placed in each of the first two impingers, and
two hundred ml of 10 percent H202 was placed in the third,
fourth, and fifth impingers. The train was set up with the probe
as shown in Figure D-l. The sampling train was leak checked at
the sampling site prior to each test run by plugging the inlet to
the nozzle and pulling a 15 inch Hg vacuum, and at the conclusion
of the test by plugging the inlet to the nozzle and pulling a
vacuum equal to the highest vacuum reached during the test run.
The pitot tube and lines were leak checked at the test site
prior to each test run and at the conclusion of each test run.
The check was made by blowing into the impact opening of the
pitot tube until 3 or more inches of water was recorded on the
manometer and then capping the impact opening and holding it for
15 seconds to assure it is leak free. The static presssure side
of the pitot tube was leak checked using the same procedure,
except suction was used to obtain the 3 in. H~0 manometer read-
ing. Crushed ice was placed around the impingers to keep the
temperature of the gases leaving the last impinger at 68°F or
less. The nozzle size was selected to maintain the isokinetic
sampling rate below 1.0 cfm.
*
Whatman Reeve Angel 934AH.
D-4
-------
o
I
THERMOMETER
SENSOR
STACK
MALL
r
REVERSE TYPE
PI TOT TUBE
THERMOMETER
PROBE
THERMOMETER
IMPINGERS (6)
HEATED
FILTER
HOLDER
PI TOT
MANOMETER
150
H,0
0 ml_V" ?00 ml.
^ ?00 9 J
THERMOMETERS
SILICA
GEL
BYPASS
VALVE
VACUUM
GAUGE
ORUICE
MANOMETER
AIR TIGHT
PUW*
VACUUM
LINE
Figure D-l. Participate and arsenic sampling train.
-------
The particulate/arsenic sampling train which was operated
continuously during the converter cycle was sampled across the
duct using 6 sampling points on each traverse for a total of 12
sampling points. The length of testing each sampling point
varied depending on the length of the converter cycle. The
particulate/arsenic train operated during the specific process
operating modes was run at a single point of average velocity.
During sampling, stack gas and sampling train data were
recorded every 10 minutes and when significant changes in stack
flow condition occurred. Isokinetic sampling rates were set
throughout the sampling period with the aid of a nomograph or
calculator. All sampling data were recorded on the Particulate
Field Data Sheet.
Sample Recovery Procedure
The sampling train was moved carefully from the test site to
an office provided by ASARCO for a cleanup area. The weight of
each impinger was determined prior to recovery for moisture
determination. Sample fractions were recovered as follows:
Container No. 1 - The filter was removed from its holder and
placed in a petri dish and the petri dish was sealed.
Container No. 2 - Loose particulate and acetone washings
from all sample-exposed surfaces prior to the filter were
placed in a polyethylene container. Particulate was removed
from the probe with the aid of a brush and acetone rinsing
and added to the same polyethylene container. The liquid
level was marked and the container was sealed.
Container No. 3 - After the probe and all sample-exposed
surfaces prior to the filter were rinsed with acetone,
additional rinses with 0.1 N NaOH were performed, placed in
a polyethylene container, sealed, and labeled. The liquid
level was marked after the container was sealed. No more
D-6
-------
than 150 ml of 0.1 N NaOH was used (maximum volume in
Container No. 3, 150 ml).
Container No. 4 - The contents of the first two impingers
were transferred to a polyethylene container. Each impinger
was rinsed twice with 30 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and the rinse
added to the container. The back-half of the filter holder
and connecting glassware were rinsed twice with 0.1 N NaOH
and the rinse added to the container. The container was
then sealed, labeled, the liquid level marked, and then
stored. No more than a total of 150 ml of 0.1 N NaOH was
used for all the rinses (maximum volume in Container No. 4,
500 ml).
Container No. 5 - The contents of the third, fourth, and
fifth impingers were transferred to a polyethylene con-
tainer. Each impinger was rinsed twice with deionized,
distilled water, the connecting glassware rinsed twice with
deionized, distilled water, and the rinses added to the
container. The container was sealed, labeled, the liquid
level marked, and then stored. No more than a total of 250
ml of deionized, distilled water was used for all rinses
(maximum volume in Container No. 5, 900 ml).
Container No. 6 - A minimum of 500 ml of the acetone was
taken for blank analysis. The blank was obtained and
treated in the same manner as the rinse.
Container No. 7 - A minimum of 500 ml of deionized, dis-
tilled water was taken for blank analysis. The blank was
obtained and treated in the same manner as the rinse.
Container No. 8 - A minimum of 500 ml of H«0_ was taken for
blank analysis. The blank was obtained and treated in the
same manner as the rinse.
Container No. 9 - A minimum of 500 ml of 0.1 N NaOH was
taken for blank analysis. The blank was obtained and
treated in the same manner as the rinse.
The silica gel from the sixth impinger was weighed and this
value was recorded on the Sample Recovery and Integrity Data
Sheet with other pertinent data.
After recovery of all containers the entire train except for
the silica gel impinger was rinsed with deionized, distilled
water to remove any residual NaOH prior to preparation for the
next run. This rinse was discarded.
D-7
-------
Analytical Procedures
The following procedures were used and followed the methods
described in EPA Methods 5 and 108.
Container No. 1 - The filter and any loose particulate were
desiccated for 24 hours to a constant weight and weighed to
the nearest 0.1 mg. After a final weight had been obtained
the filter was digested in a 150 ml beaker using 0.1 N NaOH
followed by concentrated HNO... The solution was filtered.
The filtrate was boiled and evaporated to dryness. Nitric
acid was then added and the sample diluted before analysis
by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. If any solids
remained on the filter, the filter was digested in a PARR
acid digestion bomb using HNO^ and HF prior to analysis.
Container No. 2 - The acetone washings of the nozzle probe
and front half of the filter holder were transferred to a
tared glass beaker, evaporated to dryness at ambient temper-
ature and pressure, desiccated for 24 hours to a constant
weight, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg. The residue was
combined with the contents of Container No. 1 and analyzed
for arsenic.
Container No. 3 - The 0.1 N NaOH rinses of the probes and
exposed surfaces were diluted to 200 ml and a 50 ml aliquot
was removed and digested using HNCu before arsenic analysis.
Solids were combined with the contents of Container No. 1
and analyzed for arsenic.
Container No. 4 - The contents were diluted to 500 ml. An
aliquot was taken and digested with HNO^ before final
dilution and atomic absorption analysis for arsenic.
Container No. 5 - The contents were diluted to 1 liter. An
aliquot of this solution was removed and titrated with NaOH
to a phenolphthalein endpoint for the determination of S0_.
The term "constant weight" means a difference of no more
than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less tare weight,
whichever is greater between two consecutive readings, with no
less than 6 hours of desiccation between weighings. All analyt-
ical data are recorded on the Analytical Data Sheet and appro-
priate Blank Data Sheet.
D-8
-------
All blanks were digested and analyzed using the same proce-
dures as the corresponding sample fractions.
The samples were analyzed on an atomic absorption spec-
trophotometer. The solutions were first analyzed using the flame
techniques as outlined in EPA Method 108. However, if the
samples were below the flame detection limit, the furnace tech-
nique (heated graphite furnace) was employed. Possible matrix
effects for either method were checked using the "Method of
Additions".
During the test series the EPA (Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Emission Measurement Branch) collected
samples under an associated test program which PEDCo digested and
split with ASARCO for arsenic analysis. PEDCo analyzed the one
portion of the samples following the procedures outlined in EPA
Method 108. ASARCO analyzed its samples using a colorimetric
method and atomic absorption. After the results of these anal-
yses had been compared and EPA had decided on the most accurate
analytical method, PEDCo analyzed the samples collected during
the test series for arsenic following the instructions of EPA.
PARTICLE SIZE AND TRACE METAL SAMPLING
During each test run the same particle sizing methods were
used to collect samples during the various segments of the
converter cycle. An Andersen Mark III impactor and cyclone
precutter combination were utilized to collect a single composite
particle size sample during the slag blowing, finish blowing, and
D-9
-------
silica charging segments of the converter cycle. Since about 80
percent of the total converter cycle was comprised of these
modes, the majority of the test runs were conducted during these
segments.
Andersen Mark III impactors were also used to collect
samples during the other selected converter modes, charging
(matte and cold dope addition) and skimming (slag skimming and
blister pouring). The particle size tests conducted during these
specific operating modes were run during the entire operation
(from when it was initiated until it was completed as long as the
flow rate was maintained in the high mode). A description of the
sampling and analytical procedures is provided below.
Sampling Apparatus
The source sampling train used in these tests met the design
specifications established by the U.S. EPA. It consisted of:
Nozzle - Stainless steel (316) with sharp, tapered leading
edge and accurately measured round opening.
Metering System - Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers
capable of measuring temperature to within 5°F, dry gas
meter with 2 percent accuracy, and related equipment, to
maintain an isokinetic sampling rate and to determine sample
volume. The dry gas meter is made by Rockwell and the fiber
vane pump is made by Cast.
Condenser - Capable of maintaining a temperature of 68°F
with an attached thermometer to monitor temperature.
Impactors - A 15-ym cutpoint cyclone precutter attached to
the Andersen Mark III impactor with eight stages plus the
backup filter was used to test over the blowing and silica
charging segments of the converter cycle. An Andersen Mark
III impactor with eight stages plus the backup filter was
also used to test during the other selected converter modes.
D-10
-------
Sampling Procedure
After a sampling site was selected, the stack pressure,
temperature, and moisture content were measured according to
procedures described in the Federal Register.*
The sampling trains were assembled as shown in Figures D-2
and D-3. They were checked for leaks at the sampling site before
each test run by plugging the inlet to the impactor and pulling
10-in.Hg vacuum. Once the desired vacuum was reached, the
leakage rate was checked at the dry gas meter for 1 minute. If
the leak rate was less than 0.02 cfm, the sampling trains were
used to obtain the samples. Excessive leaks were corrected prior
to sampling.
The particle size sampling runs conducted during the se-
lected converter modes were run at a single point of average
velocity. As expected the emissions generated by the various
operating modes varied throughout the converter cycle. During
the testing period none of the operating modes (blowing, skim-
ming, or charging) generated enough emissions during a single
segment to collect enough particulate for a particle size test.
It was therefore necessary to test the operating modes more than
once with the same impactor to collect the proper amount of
sample.
During sampling, stack gas and sampling train data were
recorded at intervals depending on the length of the operating
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods 1 through 4, July 1981.
D-ll
-------
METER BOX
PROBE TUBE
15 um CYCLONE
PRECUTTER
Figure D-2. Andersen Mark III impactor sampling train
shown with cyclone precutter.
D-i;
-------
PROBE TUBE
METER BOX
IMPACTOR
Figure D-3. Particle size distribution sampling train.
D-13
-------
mode being tested and when significant changes in stack flow
conditions occurred. The isokinetic sampling rate was set
initially, and a constant sampling rate was maintained throughout
the sampling period. All sampling data were recorded on an
Emission Testing Field Data Sheet.
Sample Recovery Procedure
After completion of the test, the impactor assembly was
removed from the probe and carefully moved to the office provided
by ASARCO as a cleanup area with the impactor maintained in an
upright position. Each filter was removed from its holder and
carefully placed in its respective container. Any particulate
collected on the surface of the collection plates directly above
and below the filter media was brushed into the same container
with the filter media. Prior to the first collection stage,
loose particulate from all sample-exposed surfaces of the im-
pactor were brushed and then rinsed with acetone into a container
(front rinse). For the impactor runs using the cyclone precut-
ter, the particulate caught in the cyclone precutter was brushed
and then rinsed with the acetone into the same container as the
front rinse, sealed and labeled.
Analytical Procedures
Each sample fraction and any loose particulate matter from
its sample container were placed into a tared glass weighing
dish, desiccated for 24 hours to a constant weight, and weighed
to the nearest 0.1 mg. The acetone washings were transferred to
a tared beaker, evaporated to dryness at room temperature and
D-14
-------
pressure, desiccated to a constant weight, and weighed to the
nearest 0.1 mg.
The term "constant weight" means a difference of no more
than 0.5 mg between two consecutive readings, or 1 percent of
total weight less tare weight, whichever is greater, with no less
than 6 hours of desiccation between weighings.
Upon completion of the gravimetric analysis the samples were
analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AA) to determine the
concentrations of selected trace metals (arsenic, cadmium, lead,
antimony, selenium, and bismuth) in the gas stream. A Perkin
Elmer Model 550 spectrophotometer was used to analyze the samples
for the selected trace metals.
SAMPLING METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS BY
MANUAL TESTING
The following method was used in this test program. Sam-
pling procedures followed those described in Method 6 of the
Federal Register.*
Samping Apparatus
The SO. sampling train used in this test series met design
specifications established by the U.S. EPA and was assembled by
PEDCo personnel. It consisted of:
Probe - Borosilicate glass with a heating system capable of
maintaining a minimum gas temperature of 250°F at the exit
end. A plug of glass wool was placed in the end of the
probe to remove particulate matter.
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 6, July 1981.
D-15
-------
Impingers - Four impingers connected in series with glass
ball joints. The first and third impingers are of the
Greenburg-Smith design. The second and fourth are modified
by replacing the tip with a 1/2 inch I.D. glass tube ex-
tending to within 1/2 inch from the bottom of the flask.
Glass wool was placed in the first U-joint to prevent
sulfuric acid mist carryover.
Metering System - Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers
capable of measuring temperature to within 5°F, dry gas
meter with 2 percent accuracy, and related equipment, to
maintain a constant sampling rate and to determine total
sample volume.
Barometer - Aneroid type to measure atmospheric pressure to
+0.1 inch Hg.
Sample Reagents
Water - Deionized, distilled to conform to ASTM specifica-
tions D1193-74, Type 3.
Isopropanol, 80%
Hydrogen Peroxide, 10%
Potassium Iodide Solution, 10%
Analytical Reagents
Water - Deionized, distilled.
Isopropanol, 80%
Isopropanol, 100%
Thorin Indicator
Barium Perchlorate Solution, 0.0100 N
Sampling Procedure
After selecting the sampling site and the number of traverse
points necessary, the stack pressure, temperature, moisture, and
range of velocity head were measured according to procedures
described in the Federal Register.*
*
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods 1 through 4, July 1981.
D-16
-------
One sampling point was chosen and the train was assembled as
follows: 100 ml of 80 percent isopropanol in the first impinger,
100 ml of 10 percent hydrogen peroxide in both the second and
third impingers, and 200 g of silica gel in the fourth impinger.
A portion of each reagent was retained for use as a blank. The
train was assembled as shown in Figure D-4. The sampling train
was leak checked at the sampling site before and after each test
by plugging the inlet to the first impinger and pulling a 10
in.Hg vacuum. All leaks were corrected before sampling com-
menced. The probe heater setting was adjusted during sampling to
prevent any visible condensation. Crushed ice was placed around
the impingers and more ice was added during the test to keep the
temperature of the gases leaving the last impinger at 68°F or
less.
A total of 7 manual SO,, runs were conducted during the
testing period. For each run, the data was recorded at 5 minute
intervals with a total test run of at least 20 minutes. During
the test period at least one run was conducted during each seg-
ment of the converter cycle except for the copper pour, silica
charging, and finish blow modes.
At the completion of each test, the probe was removed from
the stack and the train was purged for 15 minutes by drawing
ambient air through the system.
Sample Recovery
The contents of the first impinger were measured and placed
in a leak free polyethylene container. The first impinger was
D-17
-------
HEATED PROBE
(END PACKED
WITH GLASS WOOL)
STACK WALL
o
i
M
00
IMPINGERS CONTENT
1. 100 ml 80% ISOPROPANOL
2. 100 ml 10% H202
3. 100 ml 10% H?02
4. 200 g SILICA GEL
IMPINGERS
THERMOMETER
THERMOMETERS
BYPASS
VALVE
VACUUM
LINE
VACUUM
GAUGE
^ /DRY \
I I 6AS I
U ^
\ / •
Figure D-4. Manual method S09 sampling train.
AIR TIGHT
PUMP
-------
then rinsed with 80 percent isopropanol and this rinse was added
to the same polyethylene container. The contents of the second
and third impingers were measured and placed in a leak free
polyethylene container. The second and third impingers were then
rinsed with distilled, deionized water and this rinse was added
to the same polyethylene container. Both containers were sealed
and identified, and the liquid levels were marked.
Analytical Procedures
The SO- analysis was performed on site in the mobile labora-
tory. The volume of each sample was recorded and diluted to 1000
ml with deionized, distilled water. A 20 ml aliquot of this
solution was pipetted into a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask. Eighty ml
of 100 percent isopropanol and two to four drops of thorin indi-
cator were added. The solution was titrated to a pink end point
using 0.0100 N barium perchlorate. A blank was titrated in the
same manner as the samples.
SAMPLING METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SO- BY THE CEM
A continuous extractive S0_ monitoring system was assembled
on site. This system included a sample interface designed to
provide the conditioned sampled gas or a selected calibration gas
to the Thermo Electron Model 40 Pulse Fluorescence S0» Analyzer.
A diagram showing the important features of this system is shown
in Figure D-5.
Equipment Sample Interface
The sample was withdrawn from the stack through an unheated
stainless steel probe at a representative sampling point. The
D-19
-------
CAL GAS T"? Cf~fC
t
1
pc
TEFLON CAL GAS LINE c/
1/4 1n. O.D. c c
i
l
APPROX. 50 ft ^
I
NEEDLE
VALVE
CYLINDERS M M M
NEEDLE VALVE;
>
>
DETECTION
Y CHAMBER
.-jJ^QjNt
Lyl ^3-VM
BALSTON
COALESING
a .-' ' FILTER
T/
SAMPLE LINE 1/4
y O.D.
RUBBER HOSE TO
IOBE - STACK
8 1n. HALL
. TUBE
IEATED
f VALVE
'///////// L °
/////////. P| ATPOPM
in.
TEFLON
PROTECT SAMPLE LINES
HICUBE VAN
MANOMETER
=
A.
3-WAY
VALVE
\
r(( (PMt( d*
l V V V ' ' ' ! V \|
WflMpT J 1
IMHh.J^
METER
1
[uv|
LIGHT
SOURCE
«
i~4| •*•
<
^
O^
- — ^— —
' PERMATION
DRYER
-------
sampling gas passed through an unheated coalescing filter to
remove particulate matter and moisture droplets, and then into
the Teflon sample line for transport to the analyzer. The sample
line pressure was indicated on the manometer placed just prior to
the analyzer.
Calibration gas was introduced at two points in the sample
line. A three-way valve placed before the sample line manometer
was used to inject gas into the sample line for routine calibra-
tion. (The manometer was observed and the flow of calibration
gas was regulated in order to maintain a pressure consistent with
that of the sample gas.) A second three-way valve, placed
between the sampling probe and the coalescing filter, was used
for system integrity checks.
Analyzer
The Thermo-Electron Model 40 SO_ Analyzer operated on the
principle of pulsed fluorescence. In the detection chamber the
sample was exposed to a short burst of ultraviolet light. This
excited the SO,, molecules which then fluoresced at a character-
istic wavelength in the range of 190 nm to 230 nm. The emitted
light was detected by a photomultiplier tube and this signal was
converted to S0_ concentration.
The Model 40 contained an internal pump, pressure gauge, and
rotameter and permeation dryer prior to the detection chamber.
The pump provided the pressure differentiation for the sample
acquisition as well as the increase in pressure required, for the
operation of the permeation dryer. The rotameter monitors sample
D-21
-------
flow and the pressure gauge indicates sample pressure at the
inlet of the dryer.
After leaving the dryer and passing through the detection
chamber the sample stream was expanded across a pressure regula-
tor. This dried and expanded exhaust gas now at ambient pressure
was passed through the permeation dryer on the opposite side of
the membrane with respect to the incoming sample. This provides
the pressure differentiation for the operation of the permeation
dryer, and carried the moisture transferred across the membrane
to the exhaust.
Calibration
The analyzer was calibrated during the initial setup period
using commercial standards with a guaranteed analysis ±2 percent.
Triplicate injections of each standard were made and the average
value was calcualted. For each range three standards were used
to plot a calibration curve. In this manner, instrument linear-
ity was demonstrated for the following ranges, 0 to 100 ppm, SO-;
0 to 1000 ppm, S02; and 0 to 5000 ppm, S02.
During these calibrations the gas was introduced at the
three-way valve just prior to the manometer. The calibration gas
pressure and flow rate were carefully adjusted in order to main-
tain a pressure consistent with that pressure observed when
sampling.
A daily calibration was performed by injecting the appro-
priate span calibration gas. If the instrument showed more than
10 percent drift, a complete 3 point calibration was conducted.
D-2?
-------
A daily sample line integrity check was conducted by intro-
ducing a calibration gas at the three-way valve located at the
end of the probe. This flow was maintained until a stable chart
trace was obtained. This value was compared to the appropriate
calibration curve to insure that the sample interface did not
degrade the sample. Agreement within ±5 percent was considered
acceptable.
Data Collection
The SO- monitoring system was operated on a continual basis
during the entire testing period. The SO- analyzer output was
recorded on a Heath Schlumberger strip chart recorder at a con-
stant rate of 0.05 inches per minute. The data were identified
by noting the time (military), the date, and the run number on
the strip chart at regular intervals. Sample interface and
analyzer operating parameters such as sample line pressure,
sample flow rate, and internal analyzer pressure were noted in
separate CEM status logs.
The collected data were manually reduced for maximum peak
height, peak width at one-half peak height, and peak base using
and engineering scale with 50 divisions per inch. The peak
height was multiplied by the daily calibration response factor to
determine the maximum SO^ concentration. This value was multi-
plied by the ratio of peak width at one-half height to the peak
base to determine the average S0_ concentration during each
event. The average SO- concentration, the peak base and the
D-23
-------
average stack velocities were used to calculate the mass emission
rate of S02 in terms of pounds of SO. captured per event.
The SO- reduction was difficult due to the extremely abrupt
nature of the emission episodes. The output signal from the
analyzer was recorded on a strip chart recorder. The tracer were
very sharp and frequently distorted peaks. The conventional
method of data reduction, relating concentration directly to the
average chart response over a selected time period was not appli-
cable for this situation. It was necessary to integrate the area
under each peak in order to determine the amount of S02 captured
by the air curtain for any given period.
The actual data reduction was carried out in five steps as
follows:
Peak identification
Peak measurement
Area integration
Calculation of SO- concentration and emission rates
Formulation of emission factors
The peak identification was accomplished by comparing the
notes made by the CEM operator and the PEDCo testing coordinator
to the events recorded on the strip chart. The ASARCO No. 4
converter operating logs and the No. 4 converter blower air
charts were then compared to the events identified by PEDCo.
Once the four sources were synchronized they were in reasonably
good agreement on the number and duration of events. The ASARCO
logs and charts were then used to label the events which occurred
during the unmanned periods of CEM operation.
D-24
-------
Peak measurement was performed manually utilizing an engi-
neering scale with 50 divisions per inch. The strip chart trace
was arbitrarily subdivided into uniform geometric shapes that
most nearly approximated the shape of the trace. Each shape was
then measured and the height, width at one-half height, and base
were recorded on the strip chart.
The area integration simply calculated the area of the
shapes for each identified event. Most events consisted of a
single sharp peak and were approximated by an isoceles triangle.
Integration of the distorted peaks however required the calcula-
tion and summation of a combination of rectangles and triangles.
The maximum S0_ concentration was calculated by multiplying the
height by the calibrated chart response factor. The average S02
concentration was calculated by dividing the total area by the
summed based for each event and then multiplying by the response
factor. The average S0~ concentration was multiplied by the
average stack flow rate to determine the SO emission rate in
Ib/h. (The average stack flow rates determined for the SF,
tracer study were used.) The pounds of SO- captured per event
was then calculated from the emission rates and the event dura-
tion.
The emission factor development was carried out in two
separate approaches. First the events for each cycle were
grouped into six modes. The matte charge, slag skim, and copper
pour modes are explanatory. The copper slag skims, which were
carried out just prior to the final copper pour, were included
D-25
-------
with the copper pour. The cold addition mode included all mate-
rial additions other than copper matte. The blow/standby mode
includes the converter blows and the periods when the converter
was idle. Long periods of converter standby due to weather holds
or plant repairs were not included unless measurable emissions
occurred during that time. The converter roll mode is required
to account for the large SO,, emissions which occurred as the
primary hood was raised or lowered before and after a converter
blow. The emission episodes were highly variable in nature and
appear to be largely dependent on the converter operators' con-
trol over the tuyere lines and converter angle. As a rule, any
large narrow peak which preceeded or followed a converter blow
was labeled and evaluated as a converter roll.
Occasionally the peaks from two events were superimposed.
Most commonly this occurred when a slag skim closely followed a
converter roll out. These double events were treated as a single
event. The average values of all similar events for each cycle
and mode were calculated. Emission factors were calculated based
on this average and the total tons of copper blister produced per
cycle.
HOOD CAPTURE EFFICIENCY USING A TRACER GAS
The following procedures were employed to quantify hood
capture efficiency using a tracer gas.
Injection and Sample Collection
Injection points were selected so as to yield multiple
traverse planes in the area above the converter and also at
D-26
-------
selected points near the converter mid-line to characterize
control area capture efficiency.
SF, was injected into the controlled area of the air curtain
at a constant rate. Figure D-6 illustrates the equipment used to
inject the SF, at the selected injection points. A constant
pressure was maintained on the limiting orifice to ensure a
constant injection flow rate. The injection system was cali-
brated prior to and after each sustained injection by using a
bubble meter. SF, injection rates were determined based on the
preliminary test results. An injection rate of 40-50 cc/min was
employed. Also, the temperature at each injection point was
monitored during the injection of SF, to ensure that decomposi-
tion was avoided. The tracer was injected over a selected time
period or operation mode as required.
Single point samples of the secondary hood flue gas were
collected at the downstream sampling location. Samples were
obtained by pulling a constant rate at Traverse Point No. 3 in
exhaust duct into a leak-free 15 liter Tedlar bag. Samples were
collected over a selected time period or operational mode as
required. Figure D-7 shows the sampling train used to collect
the samples. The sample bags were transferred to the on-site
laboratory for immediate analysis.
Analytical Procedure
SF, analysis was performed using a Perkin-Elmer Model 3920
gas chromatograph equipped with a Ni-63 electron capture detector
D-27
-------
to
00
^°
PRESSURE REGULATOR
TEFLON SAMPLE LINE
I
CYLINDER
OF SF,
\
LIMITING
ORIFICE
THERMOCOUPLE
LEAD WIRE
DIGITAL
READOUT
INJECTION PROBE
(3/8 1n. STAINLESS
TUBING)
THERMOCOUPLE
Figure D-6. SFg injection apparatus,
-------
STAINLESS
STEEL PROBE
f^ ^
LEAK FREE
TEDLAR BAG
A
M
;
FLOW CONTROL
fl VALVE
tJ& O
1 *• y
-• Ten nu i turn
TEFLON
SAMPLE LINE
o
M
VD
DIAPHRAM PUMP
Figure D-7. SFg sampling train.
-------
and a Valco gas sampling valve with a 1 ml sampling loop. Oper-
ating conditions were 95 percent Argon, 5 percent methane (P-5)
carrier gas (120 ml/min), 200°C injector and oven heated to
100°C, and detector heated to 275°C with the interface at 250°C.
The analytical column was an 8 ft long by 1/8 in. diameter nickel
tube packed with 70/80 mesh molecular sieve 5A. All sampling
lines and connectors were Teflon or stainless steel.
An exponential dilution system was used in constructing
calibration curves. Equipment required for the system calibra-
tion included vacuum pump, a bubble flow meter, a magnetic
stirrer and stirbars, a Pyrex 1 liter round bottom flask, a tank
of zero grade nitrogen, and miscellaneous glass and Teflon tubes
and fittings.
The electron capture detector has a linear response to
-7 -9
concentrations of SF, ranging from 1 x 10 to 1 x 10 . The
minimum detectable level of 5 x 10 is not in the linear re-
sponse range with the argon/methane carrier. An exponential
dilution system (as shown in Figure D-8) was used to prepare
standards over this concentration range. A 1 liter round bot-
tomed flask was used as a mixing chamber with a magnetically
driven stirrer to assure good agitation. Zero nitrogen flowed
through the system at a constant rate. A known amount of gaseous
SF, was then injected into the flask and the time recorded. The
concentration of SF, in the flask at any time was then calculated
from the equation:
D-30
-------
SAMPLE
LOOP
EXCESS
FLOW
VENT,,
SAMPLING
VALVE
ZERO
NITROGEN
DILUTION
FLASK
O
PERKIN-ELMER
GAS
CHROMATOGRAPH
MAGNETIC
STIRRER
Figure D-8. Expontential dilution system.
FINE
METERING
VALVE
D-31
-------
where C is the initial concentration of SF, in the flask, N is
O b
the number of gas changes, and e is a constant 2.7183. Calibra-
tions were performed daily and took approximately 2 hours to
generate the calibration curve.
In use, instrument response (peak height) was plotted
against calculated concentration of log-log paper to obtain
calibration curves. Actual sample concentrations were then found
by comparing responses to the curve, as a check, calculated from
the slope of the curve and sample response.
After the daily calibrations were completed, samples were
analyzed approximately every 5 minutes.
D-32
-------
OPACITY TEST METHODOLOGY
The Lear Siegler Model RM4 transmissometer was chosen to
measure the opacity of emissions which escaped the air curtain
and exited through the slot in the secondary hood.
The RM4 utilizes a focused, autocollimated optical system
and a chopped, dual-beam measurement technique. Light emitted by
an incandescent source in the transceiver is split into a refer-
ence beam and a measuring beam. Each beam is modulated at sepa-
rate frequencies by a rotating disc so that they can be detected
by a common photocell. The measuring beam is projected across
the entire diameter or width of the smoke channel to a retro-
reflector which directs the beam back through the smoke channel
to the photocell detector. Within the hermetically-sealed trans-
ceiver casing, the reference beam is projected onto the same
photocell detector. Signals generated by the photocell detector
are electronically separated according to their respective fre-
quencies. The system is totally insensitive to ambient light
because it responds only to light chopped at either of the two
frequencies. The electronic unit compares the signal obtained
from the attenuated measuring beam with that obtained from the
reference beam and provides an output signal proportional to the
attenuation of the measuring beam (in terms of double pass opti-
cal density).
D-33
-------
The optical system of the RM4 is designed to respond to a
narrow range of light wavelengths, corresponding to the sensi-
tivity of the light-adapted human eye; this is known as
"photopic" spectral response. This characteristic response
includes wavelengths from 400 to 700 nanometers with a maximum
between 500 and 600 nanometers. Light beams of such wavelengths
are attenuated by particulate matter as small as 0.2 microns, and
they are not subject to interference from near infrared absorp-
tion by water vapor.
Instrument calibration which includes zero and span checks
can be performed while the instrument is on line. The calibra-
tion checks are accomplished by inserting a solenoid-activated
reflector into the measuring beam so as to simulate zero opacity;
i.e., a clear-stack condition. Next, a solenoid-activated neu-
tral-density filter is inserted into the beam to provide a mea-
surement value corresponding to a preselected span calibration
point that depends upon the individual measurement range of the
instrument. Since the optical density scale is linear, these two
calibration points suffice as a check of calibration across the
entire measurement range.
The RM4 provides a 0 to 20 milliampere output signal. This
output signal can be connected directly to a chart recorder or
other remote readout device. This output signal is linear with
respect to optical density and includes a 10 percent (2 milliam-
pere) zero offset. The 10 percent zero offset allows detection
of any negative zero drift.
D-34
-------
The transmissometer is equipped with an optical bulls-eye
and an alignment device which allows alignment, verification of
alignment and, if necessary, realignment at any time without
disturbing instrument operation.
Alignment variation of up to ±0.4 degrees, equivalent to a
beam movement of 1 to 3 inches at distances of 10 to 30 feet, is
tolerated without affecting instrument performance. This toler-
ance results from the focused light beam which provides very
uniform illumination (maximum variation of ±2 percent) of the
retroreflector and a large ratio of illuminated area to effective
reflector area. Furthermore, the measuring beam is reflected
back to the transceiver unit by a corner-cube reflector that is
relatively insensitive to the angle of incident light.
Air-purging systems which provide an air window for the
optics to keep exposed optical surfaces clean and protect the
optical surfaces from condensation are provided with each instru-
ment. A standard installation consists of one air-purging system
for the transceiver unit and another air-purging system for the
reflector unit, each equipped with a side channel blower that
provides approximately 50 cubic feet per minute of double fil-
tered air.
The instrument used in this test program was equipped with a
multirange circuit card which was set on range 5. This gave the
instrument a measurement range of 0 to 98.4 percent opacity
(single pass). Prior to installing the instrument on the sec-
ondary hood, the instrument was setup in a smoke-free environment
D-35
-------
at a distance equal to the measurement distance across the sec-
ondary hood. Optical and electronic alignments were then checked
and adjustments made as needed. The transmissometer was then
installed on the secondary hood and again optical and electronic
alignments checked and any needed adjustments made. Installation
of the instrument on the secondary hood and alignment checks were
accomplished while the No. 4 converter was down for repair.
Prior to each test run, a zero and calibration check along
with an optical alignment check was performed. The instrument
then operated continuously throughout the test. During periods
that tests were not being run, the instrument was turned off and
channels to the optics sealed to protect the instrument and
optics from the dusty environment in the smelter.
D-36
-------
APPENDIX E
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
E-l
-------
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
All of the equipment used was calibrated according to the
procedures outlined in Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of
Isokinetic Source-Sampling Equipment.*
NOZZLE DIAMETER
The nozzles were calibrated by making three separate measure-
ments using different inside diameters and calculating the aver-
age. If a deviation of more than 0.002 inches was found the
nozzle was either discarded or reamed out and remeasured. A
micrometer was used for measuring. This calibration data is
shown in Figure E-l.
PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION
The pitot tubes used in sampling were constructed by PEDCo
Environmental and met all requirements of Method 2, Section 4.1
of the Federal Register.** Therefore, a baseline coefficient of
0.84 was assigned to each pitot tube. See Figures E-2 and E-3
for alignment requirements of Method 2, and Figures E-4 through
E-7 for actual calibration and inspection data of the pitot tubes
used during the test program.
*
Office of Air Programs Publication No. APTD-0576.
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 2, July 1981.
E-2
-------
Date //
Calibrated by
Nozzle
identification
number
DI, in.
D2, in
D3, in.
AD, in.
avg
( B '
Jt
.113
.eo£
,001
,061
,00 Z-
.il D
6.0
VJf
whe
?e*/l1
-III
D, 2 ~ = nozzle diameter measured on a different diameter, in,
' ' ' Tolerance = measure within 0.001 in.
AD = maximum difference in any two measurements, in.
Tolerance = 0.004 in.
D = average of D,, D_, and D-.
SVCJ J. £ J
Figure E-1. Nozzle calibration data.
E-3
-------
TRANSVERSE
TUBE AXIS
\
FACE
*~ OPENING ~
PLANES
(a) ENDVIEW
LONGITUDINAL
TUBE AXIS
A-SIDE PLANE
; —•
a t
0.48 cm < Dt < 0.95 cm
(3/16 in.) (3/8 in.)
NOTE:
1.05 Dt < P < 1.50 Dt
PA=PB
B-SIDE PLANE
(b)
A or B
(c)
Figure E-2. Properly constructed Type S pitot tube, shown in: (a) end view;
face opening planes perpendicular to transverse axis; (b) top view; face open-
ing planes parallel to longitudinal axis; (c) side view; both legs of equal
length and center!ines coincident, when viewed from both sides. Baseline
coefficient values of 0.84 may be assigned to pitot tubes constructed this way.
E-4
-------
al/
•RANSVERSE /
TUBE AXIS |/
(a)
LONGITUDINAL
TUBE AXIS
(e)
(f)
B2 (+ or -)
Bl (+ or -)
Figure E-3. Types of face-opening misalignment that can result from field
use or improper construction of Type S pitot tubes. These will not affect
Cp so long as a-| and a? <10°, Bi and B? <5°, z <0.32 (1/8 in.) and w <0.08
cm (1/32 in.).
E-5
-------
Pilot Tube No.
Date
Inspector
Degrees
/"
<10°
°2
Degrees
^
<10°
Degrees
J°
<5°
Degrees
^
<5°
Dt
Inches
,31$
0.185 < Pt <0.380
P
Inches
,W^
-
1.05 Dt
Inches
A^-
-
1.50 Dt
Inches
,-:TUS
-
Y
Degrees
i?°
-
Degrees
^O
^^**
-
Inches
,6^
<0.125
P • (<*>)
sin vv/
Inches
.030^
<0. 03125
Pl
Inches
.^3>^
1.05
3
-------
Pilot Tube No.
Date /M'fJL Inspector
Degrees
•£°
<10°
Degrees
J*
<10°
Degrees
1-°
<5°
Degrees
V-°
<5°
Dt
Inches
• 373"
0.185 < Pt <0.380
P
Inches
. A^
-
I. 05 Dt
Inches
iW-
-
I. 50 Dt
Inches
,SL-3
-
Y
Degrees
v— *
-
Degrees
fl 0
-
Inches
, 075"
<0.l25
P • (<•)
SHI w/
Inches
, o3D
<0.03l25
Inches
/ f6~V
1. 05 D.
-------
Pilot Tube No. J7Q
Date
/ /7/eJ- Inspector J?. A-~
7
ai
Degrees
2 ^
<10°
a2
Degrees
i Q
<10°
6i
Degrees
0.0
<5°
62
Degrees
2.0
<5°
Dt
Inches
0-3 ? f
0.185 <. Pt <0.380
P
Inches
o. ?<**-
-
1.05 Dt
Inches
0. 3^y
-
1.50 Dt
Inches
0.SCS
-
Y
Degrees
/ .C
-
Degrees
OrP
-
Inches
O.oi 7
<0.125
P • (4>)
sin
Inches
0. oo 0
<0. 03125
Inches
o.^eo
1.05 Dt
-------
Pi tot Tube No.-
'-
Insped
for ^^S^T/
Degrees
/*
<10°
°2
Degrees
?'
<10°
Degrees
r>°
<5°
Degrees
/°
<5°
Dt
Inches
0&1&
0.185 < Pt <0.380
P
Inches
,, tf-?3~
-
1.05 Dt
Inches
.-; J?^^/
-
1.50 Dt
Inches
& . ^^ ^_
-
Y
Degrees
C. :--> °
-
Degrees
/r
-
Inches
.0037
<0.125
P • U)
SHI w/
Inches
-COM
<0. 03125
Inches
TA V^?^*
1.05 Dt
-------
DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE METER
Figure E-8 was the set-up used for the initial and post-test
calibration. A wet test meter with a 2-cubic-feet-per-minute
capacity and +1 percent accuracy was used. The pump was run for
approximately 15 minutes at an orifice manometer setting of 0.5
inch of water to heat up the pump and wet the interior surface of
the wet test meter. The information on Figure E-9 (example
\
calculation sheet) was gathered for the initial calibration and
then, the ratio of accuracy of the wet test meter to the dry test
meter, and the AH@ were calculated.
POST-TEST METER CALIBRATION CHECK
A post-test meter calibration check was made on the meter
box used during the test to check its accuracy against its last
calibration check. This post-test calibration must be within _+5
percent of the initial calibration. The initial calibration was
performed as described in APTD-0576. The post-test calibration
was performed using the same method as the initial calibration.
Three calibration runs were made using the average orifice
setting obtained during each test run and with the vacuum set at
the average value obtained during each test run. After running
the post-test calibration check all three runs were within the +5
percent range allowed by the Federal Register.*
The initial and post-test meter box calibration data are
presented in Figures E-10 through E-13.
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 2, July 1981.
E-10
-------
o
UMBILICAL I
I
/GLASS TUBE
( THERMOMETER
V
\
METER BOX *»^
PRESSURE
CONTROL
VALVE
U - TUBE
MANOMETER
WET TEST METER
Figure E-8. Calibration setup.
DATE
KCTER BOX NO.
•AROHFTRIC PRESSURE,PK
in. Hq.
DRY GAS METER HO.
Orifice
Mnonwter
•etting
fiH
in. H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
Cat volume
wet test
meter
v ,
w
ft3
5
5
10
10
10
10
Gas volume
dry 9»B
•eter
V
ft3
Met te»t Dry gaa neter
•eter
V
•r
Inlet
*«'
•r
outlet
ldn'
•T
Avrr«ge
ld'
•r
Ti»e
e,
•in
T
AHC
Average.
AH
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
4.0
6H
n~z
0.0366
0.0737
0.110
0.147
0.221
0.294
>
VW PK (td * «00'
vd (pb * TTT«> (t« * "°>
6H*
0.0317 AH [ (t«* 4'0) 6V
Pfc (ttf * 460) [ V^ J
1 • lUtio of accuracy of wet teat Meter to dry teat awter. Tolerance • •» 0.01
tut * Orifice of preature differential that give* 0.75 Cf» of air at 70*F and 29.92 inchea of
•ercury. in H^). Tolerance • »0.15.
Figure E-9. Calibration data sheet.
E-ll
-------
DATE:
KTER IOX NO.
CALIBRATOR: A. A>
IAROMETR1C PRESSURE (P J 2 9. 6S~& In. Hg
P «^
Lett: Checks:
Positive (minimum 5 1n. H?0):
Negative (within 3 in. Hg of absolute):
*hot to eaceei O.OQl cfm.
1n.
Orifice
manometer
setting
6H
In H-0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
Volume
wet test
meter
V*
ft3
iyt ooO
I3,e>t>0
;3, PifO
ft, ODt>
i^.OOO
1?.°*°
Volume
dry gas
meter
Vd
ft3
/ 2.106
it y/r
ft. 30°
i2. D**
2r,9oo
3B.6&2.
}3. DDt>
i£. 7*0
fd. ?oo
//, tyo
Af.t<^
te. 3°tf
Temperatures
Wet test
meter
\
•F
7f. 0
7i. »
7i. C
?<.o
tf.O
-71.0
-)i.O
•)t..C
7/. o
•>/. o
~il. 0
7,.o
Dry gas meter
Inlet
71
•F
Kfe
hH
sa
66
fi-ft
86
se
98
&7
*7
•?^
«7
Outlet
To
•F
7eJ
77
7^
7B
7tf
78
^7
7K
7L
77
7fe
7^
Average
Td
•F
82. S
feio
620
52.8
&/.&
g/.3
Duration
of
test
f
•1n
y*
««f
n»J
**%
«'%
»*£
Vacuum
setting
1n
Hg
/o.O
/1.o
IS
lf>,0
(0.O
(f.o
t must not deviate by more than +0.0? Y. Average
AHP must not deviate by more than 0.15 In H^O.
•Y
l.o fi
I.eW
(.&
1.037
l.*32
l.o$3
/.fc57
AHP
In N20
l'8i
\.1B
/.S9
/.fs>
/.^r
m
y,y?
AH
)(Td * 460)
( Vd )(Pb * AH/13.6) (Tw * 460)
(0.0317H AH )
( Pb )(Td * 460)
460)(f
f|2
0.5
1.0
Ao
l.S
f/2. 7*2. H 2*.
2.0
?. ooc)(
(0-3/7 )( 2.
r»2
3.0
Hc?/.o
I.
4.0
(/2r »o If .2*.
(«>. »?
-------
DATE: /*£•&£»*£•/ /.
BAROMETRK PRESSURE (Pbar):
PLANT: J^4/3 QJC, -H"*. c- (»\ b
. Hg
METER BOX NO.
PRETEST Y:
PROJECT NO
PROJECT MANAGER: /?
V
. >
/ Temperatures
Orifice
manometer
setting
*•
AH
in. H20
Wet test
meter
volume
V
ft
Dry gas
meter
vol ume
Vd
ft3
Wet est
meter
Tv
•F
Dr
Inlet
Tai
•F
gas meter
OutletAverage
di
•F
''d
•F
Vacuum
setting
**
in. Hg
Duration
of run
0
min
AHP
13
V
Post-test average***
w
bar
Td4460
(0.0317)( AH )
AH/13.6)(TW4460)
~(Tw+460)(
w
)( 533.0)
j>) ( A 0 )
*To be the average AH used during the test series.
**To be the highest vacuum used during the test series.
***Post-test Y must be within the range, pre-test Y *0.05y
Post-test AH? must be within the range, pre-test AHP +0.15
Figure E-10 (continued)
E-13
-------
DATE
CALIBRATOR:
METER BOX NO
. fi&fs
IAROMETR1C PRESSURE (P^) ,37,'V In. Hg
Leak Checks
Positive (minimum 5 1n. HzO):
negative (within 3 in. Hg of absolute):// &OVU cfff*
to exceed O.OOi. cfm.
in. Mg
Orifice
manometer
setting
AH
1n
Volume
vet test
meter
ft
Volume
dry gas
meter
ft
Temperatures
Met test
•eter
Dry gas meter
nle
T1
•F
€
tlet
To
•F
Average
7d
Duration
Of
test
f
•in
Vacuum
letting
1n
AHP
In H20
0.5
&•
Si
1.0
fz
/o.o
1.5
/o.
Jc.S
/O
2.0
f?
fc.o
3.0
4.0
/0.0
/v.o
t nust not deviate by more than +0.02 \.
AHP nust not deviate by more than" 0.15 In H.O.
Average
AH«
AH
)(Td 4 460)
( Vd )(Pb * AH/13. 6) (Tw* 460)
(0.03U)( AH )
( Pb )(Td 4 460)
(T * 460) (f
0.5
£. /T4J( -^
25", /
1.0
.(
1.5
(7V, i
.(
2.0
)( ?f.
(.«'?)(
.(
3.0
( 24.1
.(
ft
4.0
M
.(
Figure E-ll. Particulate sampling meter box calibration data sheet.
E-14
-------
DATE:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PLANT:
A /
METER BOX NO.
l;.P?.£3
*To be the average AH used during the test series.
**To be the highest vacuum used during the test series.
***Post-test Y must be within the range, pre-test Y +0.05y
Post-test AH9 must be within the range, pre-test AHP *0.
Figure E-ll (continued)
E-15
-------
BATE:
CALIBRATOR:
JL
KTER BOX NO.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
u Hg
Leak Checks:
Positive (minimum 5 In. H?0): ^_^__^
Negative (within 3 in. Hg of absolute):
•Not to exceed 0.005 cfm.
Co o i
cfm*
In. Hg
Orifice
nanometer
setting
AH
1n H.O
Volume
wet test
•eter
ft
Volume
dry gas
•eter
ft
T«niperatures
Net test
•eter
Dry gas meter
nlet
T1
•F
£
ou
tlet
To
•F
Average
Duration
of
test
Vacuum
setting
1n
Hg
AHP
In H20
0.5
•>&.<) 00
77
7o . o
1.0
7V
76*0
/o. c-
1,1-
1.5
76
?0: 0
So
I Z.I
2.0
30
70-
3.0
fCO
82-
4.0
tfrt.ort
ID,
el
**
/o.o
o.vn
T must not deviate by more than +0.02 >.
AHP must not deviate by more thaK 0.15 In H.O.
Average
AH?
AH
)(Td + 460)
( Vd )(Pfc + AH/13. 6)(Tw + 460}
(0.0317)( AH )
{ Pfc )(Td * 460)
(TM •» 460)(g)"l2
( V )
0.5
T.O(
y. ix
1.0
(13.
1.5
L ( /.?.
2.1
2.0
. OUO ).
3.0
4.0
(10.
-J
Figure E-12. Particulate sampling meter box calibration data sheet.
E-16
-------
DATE:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (Pbar):
PLANT : *Vte ««= - "M ^ — A,
. Hg
METER BOX NO. £_
PRETEST Y:
PROJECT NO.
AHP:
PROJECT MANAGER:
r rfr
Orifice
manometer
setting
*-
AH
in. H20
Wet test
meter
volume
ft
Dry gas
meter
volume
ft
Temperatures
e es
meter
Dr
3nlet
Tdi
•F
gas meter
OutletAveragc
Vacuum
setting
**
. Hg
Duration
of run
min
4HI?
/0.0
93,
-o
/O. a
3/1. 3'
73
,0
Post-test average
***
flmp
V460
(0.0317)( AH )
Vd )tphar * AH/13. 6)(Tw + 460)
"(Tw+460)( e
(/c- /o/ )(
0 X
n 2
)(
)(
)(
fg^F]
)
*To be the average AH used during the test series.
**To be the highest vacuum used during the test series.
***Post-test Y "Hist be within the range, pre-test y ^O.
Post-test AH? must be within the range, pre-test AH@ +0.15
Figure E-12 (continued)
E-17
-------
WTE:
CAlIIWTC
ItTW IOX DO.
lAROMTMlC WSSUtt
Ng
LMk ClttCks:
Positive (»1nlMn S 1n.
Ntgittve (vUtrin ) in. Ng of •biolutt) :
to ticeed 0.005 cfm.
43. OOC Cf»*
in. Ho
OHfke
•inometer
(Citing
AH
1n
Volume
vet test
•eter
ft
Volume
dry 9*1
•eter
ft
lett
•eter
Dry g«s aeter
ne
T1
•r
£
tlet
\
Average
Duration
Of
ten
t
Vtcuum
•ettlng
1n
M0
AM
6.0 \
91
1.0
•366
•3D
•31
•BO
1.5
/.o
2.0
/o.O
3.0
&,*
.
.O
4.0
mm
t Bust not deviate by «ore than *0.02 >.
AW Bust not deviate by «ore than 0.15 In
Average
AH*
AH
)(Td * 460)
* AH/13.6)(T 4 166)
(0.0317)( AM )
(T., * 460) (I
< V, )
I
0.5
1.0
( -SsQ j(
\t
.(
1.S
( // 0 )(
)(
.( //• 0
•ff
2.(
i /co
.( /O
^T
1.0
Jf_
.( /£?,»
4.0
I//,V ^f
Jl
Figure E-13. Participate sampling meter box calibration data sheet.
E-18
-------
DATE: _
BAROMETRIC PRESSURMPbar): 2< $,!*,
<5.0
*To be the average AH used during the test series.
**To be the highest vacuum used during the test series.
Post-test Y must be within the range, pre-test Y +0.05-y
Post-test AHP must be within the range, pre-test AH@ +0.15
Figure E-13 (continued)
E-19
-------
THERMOCOUPLES
Thermocouples were calibrated by comparison against an
ASTM-2F thermometer at approximately 32°F, ambient temperature,
100°F, and 500°F. The thermocouples read within 1.5 percent of
the reference thermometer throughout the entire range when ex-
pressed in degrees Rankine. If the thermocouple did not read
within 1.5 percent, a correction formula based on a least squares
analysis of the data was utilized. The correction formula cor-
rected the data 1.5 percent. The thermocouple was checked at
ambient temperature at the test site to verify the calibration.
Calibration data is presented in Figures E-14 through E-17.
DIGITAL INDICATOR FOR THERMOCOUPLE READOUT
A digital indicator was calibrated by feeding a series of
millivolt signals to the input, and comparing the indicator
reading with the reading the signal should have generated. Error
did not exceed 0.5 percent when the temperatures were expressed
in degrees Rankine. Calibration data are shown in Figures E-18
and E-19.
DRY GAS THERMOMETERS
The dry gas thermometers were calibrated by comparison
against an ASTM-2F thermometer at approximately 32°F, at ambient
temperature, and at approximately 110°F. The thermometer agreed
within 5°F of the reference thermometer. The impinger thermom-
eters were calibrated in a similar manner at approximately 32°F
and at ambient temperature. The thermometers agreed with 2°F of
E-20
-------
Date:
fhil
Ambient temperature:
Calibrator: Q ^
7* _
Thermocouple No.:
°F Barometric pressure:
Reference: /Q3T/*-
113
Hy
Reference
point
No.
/
2
?
V
.
Source,*
(specify)
2
1
3
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature,
op* * *
76
3~
)37
YV
Thermocouple
temperature,
Op
?y
3i
I$J
^iz.
Difference,
%**
0 37
~ 0.7°
o.i7
?,V<>
Correction factor****: Slope; /. i>
Intercept;
Reference
point
No.
1
z
3
1
Reference
thermometer
temperature,
Op
7t
?r
137
Y^^i
Corrected
thermocouple
temperature,
Op
7^
J-/
HO
1.5T?
Q.fC>
x 100?-
Critical test points are 32°, 100°, and 500°.
*Source: 1) Ice bath
2) Ambient
3) Furnace
**Percent difference
Reference temp. °F - thermocouple temp. °F
(Reference temp. °F + 460°F)
Each percent difference must be less than or equal to 1.5%
***Reference thermometer must be ASTM.
****Correction factor must be determined if any percent difference
is >1.5%.
Figure E-14. Thermocouple calibration data sheet.
E-21
-------
Date:
Thermocouple No.:
Ambient temperature: 7/ °F Barometric pressure:
Calibrator: /?. /4/>»,5f c>
£>. Ot?
Correction factor****: Slope:
Intercept:
Reference
point
No.
Reference
thermometer
temperature,
oF
Corrected
thermocouple
temperature,
°F
Difference,
%**
Critical test points are 32°, 100°, and 500°.
*Source: 1) Ice bath
2) Ambient
3} Furnace
**Percent difference
Reference temp. °F - thermocouple temp. °F
(Reference temp. °F + 460°F)
x 100%
Each percent difference must be less than or equal to 1.5%
***Reference thermometer must be ASTM.
****Correction factor must be determined if any percent difference
is >1.5%.
Figure E-15. Thermocouple calibration data sheet.
E-22
-------
Date: O/3/<%® Thermocouple No.: x*. ^^>
Ambient temperate e: "7^ °T Barometric pressure: 5£ ?Y " H
Calibrator
Reference
point
No.
/
^,
3
V
Correction
: Z*7 /\r*~ *\'~v ^ j Reference: ~fAer^~ <. — -v'/£ f3^
1
Source , *
(specify)
£
i
Rc-ferencc
, thermometer
temperature ,
°p* « *
^° ^-7^
Thcrmocoup] t
temperature, Daf f cre-ncu ,
* "
7) -&.(*{
f ?i (7i^ ' ^/ o. ,?^
3 /^° £s~?
Reference
thermometer
temperature,
CF
TO
Corrected
thermocouple
temperature, Difference,
°F ^**
i
£i \ O. **T
j~r 3j : *.y1.5%.
Figure E-16. Thermocouple calibration data sheet.
E-23
-------
Date:
Thermocouple No.:
Ambient temperature: 7^ °F Barometric pressure: 3*1.2. /W^lrc,- Reference: A5TW -3Lf-
Reference
point
No .
/
^
?
U
Source, *
(specify)
2
/
Reference-
thermometer
temperature,
op* * *
7*1
3i
3 HO
3 J
- C, M
x 100V
Critical test points are 32°, 100°, and 500°.
*Source: 1} Ice bath
2) Ambient
3) Furnace
**Percent difference
Reference temp. CF - thermocouple temp. °F
(Reference temp. °F + 460°F)
Each percent difference must be less than or equal to 1.51
***Reference thermometer must be ASTM.
****Correction factor must be determined if any percent difference
is >1.5%.
Figure E-17. Thermocouple calibration data sheet.
E-24
-------
Date
' A
Indicator Ho.
Opera
Test Point
No.
0
1
2
3
4
Millivolt
signal*
**
Equivalent
temperature.
•F*
96.
_§-z..o
/02*~l
K/.l
/Pl°
Digital Indicator
temperature reading,
•F
73.*
3^-6
/06,l
*feo.'
//J4.5
Difference,
X
Ml%
o.tt%
V»3?l
0,111*
o,/fo
Percent difference must be less than or equal to 0.5%.
Percent difference:
(Equivalent temperature °R- Digital Indicator temperature reading *R)(100S)
(Equivalent temperature *R)
Where °R » °F * 460DF
*See thermocouple digital Indicator calibration verification device calibra-
tion for these values.
**Th1s point 1s ambient temperature. The device 1s off and therefore Is
supplying no signal other than ambient temperature.
Figure E-18. Thermocouple digital indicator calibration data sheet.
E-25
-------
Indicator No.
Operator
Test Point
No.
1
2
3
4
Millivolt
signal*
O OOO
/.sit
#*$$
£5, ^5
Equivalent
temperature,
°F*
3c^°
/fcp.,z
^57- /
//.??.
Digital Indicator
temperature reading,
°F
-32-
yoe
4z/
//*%
Difference,
%
<^oo
<9,0^
0,o/
-O.O&
Percent difference must be less than or equal to 0.5%.
Percent difference:
(Equivalent temperature °R - Digital indicator temperature reading °R)(100%)
(Equivalent temperature °Rj
Where °R = °F + 460°F
These values are to be obtained from the calibration data sheet for the
calibration device.
Figure E-19. Thermocouple digital indicator calibration data sheet.
E-26
-------
the reference thermometer. The thermometers were checked prior
to each test series at ambient temperature to verify calibration.
Calibration data are included in Figures E-20 through E-23.
TRIP BALANCE
The trip balance was calibrated by comparison with a Class-S
standard weight and agreed within 0.5 g. Calibration data are
shown in Figure E-24.
BAROMETER
The field barometer was calibrated to within 0.1 in.Hg of an
NBS-traceable mercury-in-glass barometer before each test series.
The field barometer was checked against the mercury-in-glass
barometer after each test series to determine if it read within
0.2 in.Hg. If it did not reading within 0.2 in.Hg, a correction
factor was determined for the last test series. Calibration data
are included in Figure E-25.
E-27
-------
pate:
Meter Box No.:
Calibrator;
Inlet
Reference:
Reference
point
No.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
72 o
32. 7
/^7.<2
Dry gas
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
72.
12
///
Difference,
•F**
o.o
6.7
3.0
Outlet
Reference
point
No.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
•72.0
22.7
(((>. o
Dry gas
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
73
?V
/'f
Difference,
1.0
1.3
/.o
•Source: 1) Ice bath
2) Ambient
3) Water bath
••Difference must be less than or equal to +5'F.
Figure E-20. Dry gas thermometer calibration data sheet.
E-28
-------
Date:
Meter Box No.
Calibrator; 8.
Inlet
Reference;
Reference
point
No.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
•?2.o
37 ?
(O8.o
Dry gas
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
•?£
?
Difference,
•p..
y.o
7.3
2.0
Outlet
Reference
point
No.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
72 0
32.7
K7. f
Dry gas
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
75
3*
Iff
Difference,
•F*«
/. o
/.3
2.^
•Source: 1) Zee bath
2) Ambient
3) Water bath
••Difference must be less than or equal to +5'F.
Figure E-21. Dry gas thermometer calibration data sheet.
E-29
-------
Date:
Meter Box No
Calibrator:
Inlet
B .
T^-o^
g
Reference;
Reference
point
No.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
7^.0
33.5"
//?.
-------
Date:
Meter Box No.:
FQ-1
Calibrator:^
Inlet
• Sj.
Reference:
Reference
point
Mo.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
75". o
32-0
/2f- °
Dry gas
thermometer
temperature,
•F
7S
21
/2Z
Difference,
•F**
/- £>
/.^
Ac?
Outlet
Reference
point
Mo.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
7*.0
3*.o
uv.c
Dry gas
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
7/
31
123
Difference,
•F**
/.**
/.c
f. 0
•Source: 1) Ice bath
2) Ambient
3) Water bath
"Difference must be less than or equal to +5*F.
Figure E-23. Dry gas thermometer calibration data sheet.
E-31
-------
Balance
No.
Date-
Calibrator
Mass determined for
Error
50 g Error
100 g
Error
/L
.AT
i I
//
/V/
.7
c>.
c
»~e*
/C,
Error must not exceed 0.5 grams at each point.
Figure E-24. Trip balance calibration data sheet.
E-32
-------
BAROMETER
NO.
PRETEST
vseM
BAROMETER
READING
REFERENCE
BAROMETER
READING
DIFFERENCE
0,01-
/'.r
0,02.
DATE
12tc
fe~/-3-fe
CALIBRATOR <:
POST-TEST
BAROMETER
READING
30.02.
REFERENCE
BAROMETER
READING
7.9- 9
DIFFERENCE
**
00
DATE
CALIBRATOR
*Barometer is adjusted so that difference does not exceed 0.05 in. Hg.
**Barometer is not adjusted. If difference exceed 0.10 in. Hg, inform project
manager imnedTately.
Figure E-25. Barometer calibration log.
E-33
-------
APPENDIX F
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
F-l
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
AIR CURTAIN HOOD TEST PROGRAM
AT ASARCO TACOMA SMELTER
Prepared by
PEDCo Environmental, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
Contract No. 68-03-2924
Work Directive 9
PN 3490-9
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohi<
(.
Approved by: .- //tSAjLu' /{AJ ' /:JCMt/W Project Director, PEDCo
, QA Officer, PEDCo
, Project Director, EPA
, QA Officer, EPA
July 1982
F-2
-------
CONTENTS
Section Pages Revision Date
1. Project Description 3 1 09-10-82
2. Project Organization and
Responsibilities 3 0 07-20-82
3. QA Objectives for Measure-
ment Data in Terms of Preci-
sion, Accuracy, Completeness,
Representativeness, and
Comparability 5 1 09-10-82
4. Sampling Procedures 4 1 09-10-82
5. Sample Custody 1 0 07-20-82
6. Calibration Procedures and
Frequency 1 1 09-10-82
7. Analytical Procedures 2 0 07-20-82
8. Data Analysis, Validation,
and Reporting 5 0 07-20-82
9. Internal Quality Control
Checks and Frequency 1 0 07-20-82
10. Performance and Systems
Audits and Frequency 4 1 09-10-82
11. Preventive Maintenance
Procedures and Schedules 1 0 07-20-82
12. Assessment of Data Precision,
Accuracy, and Completeness 1 0 07-20-82
13. Corrective Action 2 0 07-20-82
14. Quality Assurance Reports
to Management 1 0 07-20-82
F-3
-------
CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Pages Revision Date
Appendix A - Test and Analytical
Procedures 24 0 07-20-82
Appendix B - Emission Measurement
Quality Assurance Plan 35 0 07-20-82
Appendix C - Laboratory Quality
Assurance Plan 38 0 07-20-82
List of Individuals Receiving Project QA Plan:
John O. Burckle, U.S. EPA
Guy Simes, U.S. EPA
Richard W. Gerstle, PEDCo Environmental
Charles L. Bruffey, PEDCo Environmental
Thomas J. Wagner, PEDCo Environmental
Craig H. Caldwell, PEDCo Environmental
Larry V. Yerino, PEDCo Environmental
F-4
-------
Section No. 1
Revision No.T
Date: September 10, 1982
Page 1 of 3
SECTION 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project will evaluate the effectiveness of the air
curtain hooding system installed on the primary copper converter
at ASARCo's Tacoma, Washington smelter. The primary objectives
of the test program are to:
1. Estimate the air curtain capture efficiency; overall
and during selected converter operational modes.
2. Estimate the converter emission factors for the overall
cycle and selected operational modes for:
a. sulfur dioxide (802)
b. filterable particulate
c. arsenic emissions
d. inhalable particulate, and
e. selected trace elements
3. Evaluate the air curtain operation for labor and main-
tenance requirements, operator accessibility, visibility
improvement, power requirements, and cost information.
This air curtain hooding system is the first of its kind to
control fugitive emissions from a primary copper converter. The
data from these tests will be used to evaluate this system and
determine if it is best available technology for the control of
these fugitive emissions.
The fugitive emissions collection efficiency of the air
curtain hooding system will be estimated by performing a tracer
study and performing visible emissions observations during the
test program. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF,) will be injected into
F-5
-------
Section No. 1
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 2 of 3
the fugitive emission plume and the amount of SFfi captured by
the collection system will be measured using a gas chromato-
graph equipped with an electron capture detector. Visible
emissions will be performed by certified observers using EPA
Reference Methods 9 and 22.
Filterable particulate and arsenic emissions will be mea-
sured using EPA Methods 5 and 108. A single sampling train will
be used to obtain the filterable particulate and arsenic samples.
Sampling will be performed over the entire converter cycle and
during selected operational modes.
Inhalable particulate (IP) measurements will be made using
the guidelines in the Procedures Manual for Inhalable Particulate
Sampler Operation recently developed for EPA by Southern Research
Institute.
Trace element analysis will be performed on each particle
size fraction using atomic absorption analytical techniques.
Each size fraction will be analyzed for arsenic, cadmium, lead,
antimony, selenium, and bismuth.
The tentative schedule for this project is 1) a presurvey
late in September, 2) SF, tracer study in October, and 3) full
Southern Research Institute. Procedures Manual for Inhalable
Particulate Sampler Operation. Prepared for EPA under Contract
No. 68-02-3118. November 1979.
F-6
-------
Section No. 1
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 3 of 3
scale test program in November. This schedule is dependent upon
plant operations. As of late August, the furnace was being
rebuilt and the shake-down period for the air curtain had not
been completed.
F-7
-------
Section No. 2
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 1 of 3
SECTION 2
PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The proposed staffing of this project is shown in Figure 2-
1. The Project Director will be Mr. Richard Gerstle who has had
extensive experience in source testing and related engineering
activities. He has the administrative responsibility for the
successful completion of the project. His duties include schedul-
ing of personnel, setting deadlines and seeing that they are met,
and overseeing the budget. Mr. Charles Bruffey, as Project
Manager, has the responsibility for the technical management of
the project. His duties include the division of labor among the
project's various tasks, the implementation of quality control
procedures, the supervision of all field activities, the final
review and reporting of all data. Mr. Wade Mason, who has exten-
sive experience in emission and fugitive testing, will serve as
Technical Advisor. Mr. Thomas Wagner, as Quality Assurance
Coordinator, is responsible for the development and implementa-
tion of the Quality Assurance Project Plan.
F-8
-------
Section No. 2
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 2 of 3
Field Sampling
Clarke
Sander
Phillips
Hershey
Scheffel
Osterhout
Fitzgerald
Antesberger
EPA - IERL
Project Officer
John Burckle
PEDCo
Project Director
R.W. Gerstle
PEDCo
Project Manager
C.L. Bruffey
Laboratory Analysis
C. Caldwell
I. Bennett
C. Jones
K. Mueller
EPA - IERL
QA Officer
Guy Simes
PEDCo
QA Officer
T.J. Wagner
PEDCo
Technical Advisor
K.W. Mason
Process Monitoring
L. Yerino
Figure 2-1. Project organization.
F-9
-------
Section No. 2
Revision No. Q
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 3 of 3
2.2 PROJECT STAFF
The staff selected for this project were chosen because of
their experience in emission measurement including manual sampling
and continuous monitors, field operation of gas chromatographs,
laboratory analysis, and process monitoring.
F-10
-------
Section No. 3
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 1 of 5
SECTION 3
QA OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENT DATA IN TERMS OF PRECISION,
ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, REPRESENTATIVENESS AND COMPARABILITY
The objectives of precision, accuracy, and completeness for
the specific emission measurements are listed in Table 3-1.
Testing will be performed over the complete process cycle and
selected process operational modes. Process operations and
testing coordination will be accomplished by the process engineer
responsible for logging process data in order to ensure the
representativeness of the data. All data will be reported in the
units specified in the methods to ensure comparability of the
data.
No reliable estimates for the precision and accuracy are
available for the overall sampling and analysis of the trace
metals. The objectvies for these parameters listed in Table 3-2
are for the analytical procedures.
The objectives for precision and accuracy listed in Table
3-2 were developed from duplicate analyses of wastewater samples
and the analysis of standard reference solutions (as separate
samples) in PEDCo's laboratory. These quality control procedures
are described in Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the PEDCo Environmental
Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan (LQAP) contained in Appendix C.
The minimum objectives for completeness are also contained in
Table 3-2.
F-ll
-------
TABLE 3-1. PRECISION. ACCURACY. AND COMPLETENESS OF EMISSION MEASUREMENTS
Measurement parameter
Gas volume
Gas velocity
Stack temperature
Partlculate weight
Gas composition,
CO- and 02
so2
so2
Particle size
(Inhalable partlcu-
late) weight
Measurement method
Dry gas meter
Method 5
S-type pi tot tube
Method 2
Thermocouple and
digital volt meter
Met tier balance
Orsat (Method 3)
Continuous Emis-
sion monitor (CEM),
pulse fluoresence
Bar1um-thor1n
titratlon
Method 6
Mettler balance
Cal 1brat1on device
Wet test meter and
critical orifice
EPA design specifi-
cations and stan-
dard pilot tube
Mercury In glass
thermometer and
mill ivolt source
Class S weights
NBS traceable gas
cylinders
NBS traceable S02
in air calibration
gases
QAD audit sample
Class S weights
Expected
Precision
+ 2%a
+ 18%a
ina
+ 0.5mga
* 0.5%a
~95% of
full scale
<4%a
+ 0.2mga
Accuracy
!«•
* 10%a
±1.5%a
+ 0.5mga
i 0.5,'
20%b or
better
t6%a
+ 0.5mga
Completeness
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
90% or
better
100%
100%
8 As listed 1n EPA QA Handbook, Volume III.
As listed in 40 CFR Appendix B, Performance Specification No. 2.
"O O 3D W»
Q> Ol (D (D
fD -»• r*
-* O
O 3
ft O
u>
-------
TABLE 3-2. PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS OF METAL ANALYSIS
i
\~>
to
Analyses
Arsenic (furnace)
Antimony (flame)
Antimony (furnace)
Bismuth (flame)
Bismuth (furnace)
Cadmium (flame)
Cadmium (furnace)
Lead (flame)
Selenium (furnace)
Precision
Average coefficient
of variation (CT)
.139
**
.070
**
**
.018
.077
.042
.055
Accuracy*
True value
(ppm)
.0750
15.0
.150
-
-
1.00
.0100
5.00
.0500
Mean (X)
(ppm)
.0762
15.0
.149
-
-
.981
.0100
5.03
.0492
Standard
deviation (o)
(ppm)
.0047
.75
.015
-
-
.034
.0006
.106
.0022
Completeness
(*)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
* Mg/1 unless otherwise stated.
** Insufficient amount of data to determine a value.
- No SRS currently available.
TJO 30 V)
tu at n> n>
(O c* < O
rt> n> -*«-»•
_,. o
O 3
-------
Section No. 3
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 4 of 5
Duplicate analyses are conducted at a minimum rate of 10
percent in the laboratory. The coefficient of variation (CV) is
calculated for each analysis pair according to the equation in
Section 5.2 (page 5-3) of the Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan
(Appendix C). The value for the CV must be within the 99.5
percentile (upper control limit = 2.8 x CV) or the analysis is
voided and the entire batch of samples is reanalyzed.
Accuracy is monitored by the analysis of a standard reference
solution (SRS). Standard Reference Solutions are available for
almost every analysis routinely conducted in the inorganic labor-
atory. These SRS's are prepared independently of the calibration
solutions. For example, there are two solutions used as SRS's
for metals. These two solutions contain all the metals analyzed
by atomic adsorption in the laboratory and are prepared from the
pure metals as salts as described in "Methods for Chemical
Analysis of Water and Wastes" (MCAWW), EPA-600/4-79-020. The
standards used for calibration are NBS traceable and are store
bought 1000 ppm solutions of the individual metals. The values
determined for the SRS are plotted on control charts and upper
and lower control limits are set at + 2 a. If the analysis of a
SRS (analysis rate 10 percent minimum) is outside the control
The coefficient of variation is expressed as a decimal fraction
(dimentionless). Reference Statistical Methods, G.W. Snedecon and
W.G. Cochran, 6th Ed., Iowa State University Press, 1967, p. 62.
F-14
-------
Section No. £
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 5 of 5
limits, the entire analytical run is voided and that batch of
samples is reanalyzed. The concentration values chosen for the
SRS are approximately the mid point of the optimum range of the
individual metal listed in MCAWW.
The values of precision were obtained from and used for
samples ranging from 20 times the method detection (MCAWW) and
up. The accuracy limits apply to the same range.
F-15
-------
Section No. 4
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 1 of 4
SECTION 4
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Where applicable, standard EPA test methodology will be
used. EPA Test Methods 1 through 6* are used to determine flue
gas velocity, temperature, composition (0- and CO.), moisture
content, particulate concentration, and sulfur dioxide content.
An SO- continuous emissions monitor (TECO pulse fluorescense)
will also be used to determine SO- gas content. Sample, analy-
tical, and data reduction techniques will follow those described
in 40 CFR, Appendix B, Performance Specification 2.
Inhalable particulate measurements (particle size) will be
made using the sample and analytical procedures described in the
Procedures Manual for Inhalable Particulate Sampler Operation
developed by Southern Research Institute for the U.S. EPA.
Particulate and gaseous arsenic content will be determined
using a combination of proposed EPA Method 108 and Method 5
analytical procedures as described in Appendix A.
A preliminary sampling plan is contained in Table 4-1 and
the corresponding analytical plan in Table 4-2. These sampling
and analytical plans may be revised based upon the results of the
presurvey and the Phase I SF., tracer study. In any case, a
b
40 CFR, Appendix A, Methods 1-6, July 1982.
F-16
-------
T
Section No.
Revision No."
Date: September 10. 1982"
Page 2
of
TABLE 4-1. ASARCO PRELIMINARY SAMPLING PLAN
Sample
activity
•Phase 1 A
Tracer study (SFfi)
•Phase 11 °
TSP - arsenic
(combined Methods
S and 108)
SO, concentration
f exhaust gas)
Visible emissions
•Method 9
•Method 22
Particle size
distribution
1PM emission factor
Tracer quantity (SFJj
Baseline
X
Presurvey
X
Process operation nodes
Converter cycle
Blister
Charge - pour
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Slag and
finish
blowing
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
No. Of
Tests
.
4
4
Min. S
days
observa-
tion -
2-3 cycles
4
4
-
A Tracer gas techniques will be used to evaluate the air capture efficiency
of the secondary control system for both test phases. Sulfur hexafluorlde
(SF,) will be used as the tracer gas with analysis by Gas Chronatography
witn Electron Capture Detector (GC-ECD). Known concentrations of SF. will
be Injected at various points in and around the secondary control system
while integrated bag samples are collected downstream and analyzed by
GC-ECD.
O Total suspended paniculate and gaseous arsenic emissions will be deter-
mined using a Method & sample train modified by adding two 1mp1ngers and
placing 200 ml of 5 percent H?0. 1n the third, fourth, and fifth Inpingers
to facilitate analysis for arsenic. One sample train will be run over
the entire converter cycle and a second sample train run only during the
converter blowing modes. At least four tests over four separate converter
cycles are recommended.
O SO. concentration in the exhaust gas stream will be monitored continuously
over four separate converter cycles. A Teco continuous emission monitoring
system will be used for this task.
A Visible and fugitive emission observations will be made concurrent with the
TSP/arsenic tests. Method 22 will be used to qualify fugitive emissions
around the converter and Method 9 for quantification of visible emissions
above the secondary control system.
• Particle size distribution and the subsequent Inhalable paniculate emis-
sion factors will be Measured concurrent with the TSP/arsenic tests.
Andersen Heavy Grain Load and Mark 111 Inpactors will be used for this
task. One inpactor will run over the entire converter cycle and a second
Inpactor run only during the converter blowing mode. At least four tests
during four separate converter cycles are recommended.
F-17
-------
Section No.
Revision No.
Date: SeDlember
1982
of
TABLE 4-2. ASARCO ANALYTICAL PLAN
Sample
type
TSP
Arsenic
so2
Particle3
size
distribu-
tion
Visible and
fugitive
emissions
Tracer
quantity
EPA
Method 5
X
(8 sets)
Proposed
EPA
Method 108
X
(8 sets)
CEM System
(Pulse-
fluoresce)
X
(Continuous
+ Method 6
manual )
EPA
Methods
9 and 22
X
(5 days)
Gravimetric
Trace
metals
by size
fraction
X
(8 sets)
GC-
ECD
(SF6)
X
Upon completion of the gravimetric analysis, each size fraction will be
analyzed for select trace metals (arsenic, cadmium, lead, antimony, selenium,
and bismuth) by Atomic Absorption techniques.
F-18
-------
Section No. 4
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Pa9e 4 of 4
detailed sampling plan will be prepared and approved by the EPA
Project Officer prior to the Phase II testing program.
F-19
-------
Section No. £_
Revision No. Q_
Date: July 20 1982
Page 1 of 1
SECTION 5
SAMPLE CUSTODY
Samples will be recovered, identified, and stored by the
procedures described in Section 4.0 of the PEDCo Environmental
Emission Measurement Quality Assurance Plan which is contained
in Appendix B of the Quality Assurance Program Plan.
Samples are received, logged, and tracked in the laboratory
by the procedures described in Section 4.1 of the PEDCo Environ-
mental Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan contained in Appendix C.
F-20
-------
Section No. fc.
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
1 of 1
SECTION 6
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND FREQUENCY
All manual sample equipment to be used is calibrated before
and after each test program according to the procedures outlined
in Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source
Sampling Equipment. Additionally, onsite calibration checks
will be made prior to the start of testing to preclude the possi-
bility of equipment damage from packaging and transport. The S0»
CEM system will be calibrated daily using procedures described in
Performance Specification 2, Appendix B, 40 CFR. The Perkin-
Elmer GC used for the SF, tracer study is calibrated daily as
described in Appendix A.
Analytical instruments to be used such as the atomic absorp-
tion (AA) spectrophotometer will be calibrated for the specific
analysis each time a batch of samples is analyzed. The standards
(minimum of four concentrations plus a blank) used for calibra-
tion are prepared from NBS traceable 1000 ppm solutions of the
individual metals. These 1000 ppm stock solutions are purchased
from a commercial supplier.
*
Office of Air Programs Publication No. APTD-0576.
F-21
-------
Section No. 7
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 1 of 2
SECTION 7
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The analytical procedures specified in the applicable EPA
Reference Methods will be followed as presented in the methods.
Audit samples for the Method 3 (orsat) and Method 6 (S02) analy-
sis will be supplied to PEDCo by the EPA. In addition, PEDCo
will employ its own internal standard samples for checking
accuracy and precision of the analytical procedures used. The
inhalable particulate (particle size) analytical procedures will
follow those described in Southern Research Institute's Procedures
Manual for Inhalable Particulate Sampler Operation. The trace
metal analytical procedures are listed in Table 7-1.
F-22
-------
Section No. 7
Revision No. o
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 2
of
TABLE 7-1. TRACE METAL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Series/Analysis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Antimony
Selenium
Bismuth
Method No.1'2
206.2
213.1, 213.2
239.1, 239.2
204.1, 204.2
207.2
303A3
Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, U.S. EPA, EMSL,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, March 1979, Publication No. EPA-600/4-79-020.
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 15th ed.,
1980, American Public Health Association, 1015 18th Street NW, Washington,
DC 20005.
If furnace techniques are required, the procedures used are similar to
those used for antimony and the optimum range is obtained from the Perkin-
Elmer methods supplied with the HGA-2200 Model Furnace.
F-23
-------
Section No. s_
Revision No. n
Date: .Tilly 20 1 982
Page i " of 5
SECTION 8
DATA ANALYSIS, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING
Where applicable, all data will be calculated according to
the appropriate Reference Method procedures. A validated com-
puter program performs most test method calculations. The field
data sheets used are set up on standard computer cards to allow
accurate date input. The data printout is then validated by
comparison with the field and analytical data sheets. In addi-
tion, hand calculation checks will be made onsite after each
emission test to verify that reference method criteria regarding
isokinetics, etc., are met. Figure 8-1 presents an example
onsite calculation form. Relative to the SF, tracer study, the
hood collection efficiency will be calculated as follows:
Hood Collection Efficiency (E) =
SFg injected - SFg measured
SF6 injected
x 10°
where: SFg injected = fixed flow (cc/min) x time (minutes)
SF measured = concentration x gas flow rate
(ftVmin) x constant (2.8317 x 10
cc/ft3)
F-24
-------
8
Section No.
Revision No. o
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 2 of 5
1 Vein"* of dr. gil ll«plW COrrfttfd to lUnd«rC Condi-
CAM "1
^^J •
?. Vcljmf O4 vatrr vIPC" «t iUifli'-d COfldMloni, ft .
v • o.wo'., •
'S13 '!
.
V
"i-e
B.l V - V
m •
StC ilO
0 i I i
5 Hr.let-li'- •fig'", o* stac» g*i
", • "o "-B.s' • le B« •
! 0
v . 8i.49Cr (^) "«• V rV •
7. ItokinelU »*riitiOn
\t, • \ • "•»
it - >td
», . D/ • 0 . F, . (l-lw)
'rp»
T
'b.r' '"' "«
TM. lr. H^O
TS. •(
V . DiC'
ltd
¥\' '
v . ft3
"lid
B.s
'••«
• co,
to,
• K^ • • '•?
«d. It). Ib-wrlf
«i. it>'ib-f!»ie
f . IP ft. ;
',• "- "'
T;.-R
7*
Cp
V%. FPS
D . ln-
1
, «iir.
1 1
««r 1
lu> ?
«u- }
Figure 8-1. Onsite calculation form.
F-25
-------
Section No. 8
Revision No. o
Date: July 20, 19R2
Page 3 of 5
All data generated by the laboratory is checked for techni-
cal accuracy by the analysts' supervisor. This involves veri-
fying that the appropriate analytical method was used, the detec-
tion limit is appropriate, the proper number of significant
figures are reported, and the data were calculated properly (this
is done by repeating the calculations for several samples). The
data are then given to a second independent person (Data Clerk)
who repeats all hand calculations and verifies all data entries
into computer programs. The data is then reviewed by the Quality
Assurance Coordinator who reviews the data and the results of the
standard reference solutions and the results of duplicate analyses,
If these values are in control and the data is acceptable, he
initials the data sheets and returns them to the project manager.
If these QC values are not in control or the data is unacceptable
for any other reason, the Quality Assurance Coordinator discusses
the analysis with the project manager, and they determine the
appropriate action.
F-26
-------
Section No. g_
Revision No. Q_
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 4 of 5
RAW DATA FLOW SCHEME
Analysts
Supervisor
Data Clerk
Quality Assurance Coordinator
Project Manager
All data summaries and final reports will be reviewed and
approved by the Project Director prior to release. The final
report will contain all of the QA data generated during the course
of the project. Figure 8-2 illustrates the report format and an
example Table of Contents.
F-27
-------
Section No. 8
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 5 of 5
CONTENTS
Figures
Tables
Quality Assurance Element Finder
1. Introduction
2. Project Data Summary
3. Process Description and Operation
4. Sample Locations and Test Methods Used
5. Quality Assurance
6. Discussion of Results
Appendix A - Computer Printouts and Sample Calculations
Appendix B - Raw Field Data
Appendix C - Laboratory Data
Appendix D - Sampling and Analytical Procedures
Appendix E - Calibration Procedures and Results
Appendix F - Quality Assurance Summary
Appendix G - Project Participants and Activity Log
Figure 8-2. Contents.
F-28
-------
Section No. 9_
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 1 of ]_
SECTION 9
INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS AND FREQUENCY
The routine emission measurement and laboratory quality
control procedures are contained in the quality assurance plans
of these groups (Sections 5 of Appendices B and C). In addition
all suggested quality control procedures contained in Volume III
of the "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement
Systems - Stantionary Source Specific Methods" are followed in
both the field and laboratory.
F-29
-------
Section No. 10
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 1 of 4
SECTION 10
PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEMS AUDITS
Relative to the manual emission sampling associated with
this project, a total system audit technique is not presently
available. However, an on-site qualitative inspection and review
of each manual measurement system will be performed by the PEDCo
project manager. Although this inspection would normally be
performed by the quality assurance officer, the project manager
will perform this inspection for this project because of the cost
involved for an additional person on site. During the systems
audit, the procedures and techniques of the field team will be
observed in the following areas:
0 Sample train set-up and leak checks
0 Isokinetic sample checks
0 Final leak check and sample train disassembly
0 Sample recovery and storage for shipment
The SO CEM system audit will be performed daily using
procedures described in Performance Specification 2 (40 CFR,
Appendix B). Additionally, manual S0_ testing will be performed
simultaneously with monitor data collection to insure proper CEM
operation. S02 audit samples supplied by EPA will be used to
check the accuracy of onsite S0_ titrations.
F-30
-------
Section No. 10
Revision No. 1
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 2 of 4
Figure 10-1 presents the onsite QA checks to be made on all
equipment used in this sample program.
PEDCo Environmental Laboratory voluntarily participates in
many externally administered audit programs as described in
Section 5.4, page 5-9, of the Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan.
In addition, the Quality Assurance Coordinator periodically sub-
mits sample(s) to the laboratory for internal accuracy checks.
These samples may be for a single analysis or for multi-
component analysis.
F-31
-------
Section No. 10
Revision No. ]
Date: September 10. 1982
Pa9e 3 of 4
ON-SITE AUDIT DATA SHEET
Audit Name:
Date:
Auditor:
Equipment
Meter box
inlet thermo.
Meter box
outlet thermo.
Impinger
thermometer
Stack
thermometer
or
Thermocouple
Orsat
analyzer
Trip
balance
Barometer
Reference
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
stack temp.
% Oj in
ambient air
IOLM std.
weight
Corrected*
NWS value
Reference
Value
20.8"
Value
Determined
Deviation
Max. Allowable
Deviation
5°F
5°F
2°F
7CF
See table
0.7'*
0.5 grams
0.20 in. Hg
Reference temp. °F
Max. deviation CF
32-140
7
141-273
9
274-406
11
407-540
13
541-673
15
674-760
17
* Correction factor:
NWS value (in. Hg) - [Altitude (ft)/1000(ft/in. Hg)] + 0.74 in. Hg**
** 0.74 in. Hg is the nominal correction factor for the reference barometer
against which the field barometer was calibrated.
If it is not feasible to perform the audit on any piece of equipment, record
"N/A" in the space provided for the data.
Figure 10-1. Onsite QA checks.
F-32
-------
Section No. 10
Revision No. ]
Date: September 10. 1982
Page 4 of 4
DATE:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (Pbar):
ORIFICE NO.
AUDIT REPORT DRY GAS METER
CLIENT:
ORIFICE K FACTOR:
in. Ng METER BOX NO.
PRETEST Y: _
AUDITOR:
Orifice Dry gas Temperatures
manometer meter Ambient Dry gas meter
reading reading T»
-------
Section No. n
Revision No. o
Date: July 20. 19R2
Page i of i
SECTION 11
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES
Section 7.0 of the PEDCo Emission Measurement Quality
Assurance Plan describes in detail the routine activities per-
taining to equipment maintenance. Relative to this specific
project, daily checks of sample equipment accuracy and operation
will be made. As is standard procedure, sufficient spare equip-
ment will be shipped to the test site so that if replacement of
defective equipment is necessary, it will be accomplished with
minimum downtime.
Preventive maintenance schedules recommended by the manu-
facturers are followed and documented in maintenance log books
with each major analytical instrument. Expendable items and
routine spare parts are also maintained with each instrument.
Non-routine items are covered under maintenance contracts with
instrument manufacturers which guarantee rapid service.
F-34
-------
Section No. 12.
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
1 of ]_
SECTION 12
SPECIFIC ROUTINE PROCEDURES USED TO ASSESS DATA PRECISION,
ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS
Standard statistical techniques will be utilized to calcu-
late the accuracy, precision, and completeness of the test data.
Precision will be calculated on the standard deviation for each
run and, if appropriate, for all samples collected by a specific
method over the entire test period. Precision estimates will be
used with standard statistical techniques to identify outliers.
The accuracy and precision of the arsenic test (Proposed EPA
Method 108) method has not been determined by EPA. Additionally,
the accuracy and precision of the method used for the tracer
study has not been established by EPA. Data obtained from this
test project can be used to establish these criteria. The com-
pleteness of the measurements will be made using check-off sheets
and through the tabulation of the data.
The methods used to determine the precision and accuracy of
the analytical methods are described in Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of
the Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan (Appendix C). Completeness
of the sample analysis will be based on the percent of valid
analytical data obtained for the number of samples received.
F-35
-------
Section No. U_
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
1 of2.
SECTION 13
CORRECTIVE ACTION
Section 5.6, page 5-8, of PEDCo's Emission Measurement
Quality Assurance Plan describes the routine approach to correc-
tive action relative to emission measurements. Any samples not
collected according to an applicable Reference Method or other
approved means will be voided. Any equipment found to be out of
calibration or not operating properly will be repaired or
replaced before additonal measurements are made.
The analytical control limits for acceptable precision and
accuracy are given in Section 3. If one or both of these values
are out of control, the Quality Assurance (QA) Coordinator and
Project Manager will review the analysis and determine the
appropriate action to be taken.
In all cases where standard procedures cannot resolve the
problem, the QA Coordinator and the Project Manager will deter-
mine the appropriate action. This joint effort has several
advantages in troubleshooting an analysis. The Project Manager
has daily contact with the procedures in the laboratory and
offers the detailed familiarity required. The QA Coordinator
offers a broad general background and a fresh outlook, taking
nothing for granted. This combination has proven itself in
giving rapid and reliable solutions to various problems. The
F-36
-------
Section No. 13_
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 2 of 2
Project Manager will be responsible for initiating the action
and the QA Coordinator is responsible for determining if this
action has resolved the problem.
F-37
-------
Section No. 14.
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 1 of ]_
SECTION 14
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS TO MANAGEMENT
All quality assurance procedures and results associated
with this project will be included in the final report. Other
internal procedures are described in the appropriate quality
assurance plans (Section 5.4, page 5-8, of Appendix B and Section
5.6, page 5-9, of Appendix C).
F-38
-------
APPENDIX A
TEST AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
F-39
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. n
Date: July 20. 1982
Page i of 24
SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM
The continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) is utilized
to continuously extract flue gas from the process and determine
the concentrations of sulfur dioxide (S0~).
The accuracy of the data provided by the CEM system is
dependent upon the gaseous stream analyzed as well as the correct
operation of the individual components of the system. This
section describes the CEM system and the techniques which are
employed to ensure that a representative sample is extracted,
analyzed and reported with a high degree of accuracy. The
extractive monitor to be used in this study for SO^ is listed
below.
Gaseous Species Principle of Operation Vendor and Model No.
S02 Pulse fluorescence TECO 40
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
The following are the five general functions that are per-
formed during the testing period to assure representative data
by the CEM system.
1. Extract a representative sample from the stack.
2. Condition the sample for the monitors by filtering out
the particulate and removing moisture to provide a
clean, dry sample gas stream.
3. Transport the sample from the sampling port to the
instruments without loss of sample integrity.
F-40
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 2 of 24
4. Provide for the introduction of calibration gases with-
out disrupting sample flow.
5. Insure that the monitors will be sampling at a constant
pressure, slightly above ambient.
SAMPLING METHOD
The CEM sample is continuously drawn through a glass-lined
probe. A sintered steel cylinder on the probe acts as a coarse
filter and a fine filter is placed just before the dryer. Both
the probe and the fine filter are heated, and the intervening
line is insulated to prevent condensation and possible loss of
sample. A blow back system is used to periodically clean the
coarse filter, and the fine filter is inspected daily and replaced
as necessary. The dryer to be used is a Perma Pure Model PD
1000-24PS, located as near as possible to the sample port. Com-
pressed air and a permeation tube type dryer provide an unter-
rupted stream of dry air. Only Teflon sample lines are used, and
the exposed line is covered by a flexible sheath to prevent dam-
age.
A one horsepower diaphragm pump is used to draw the sample
through the sampling interface and deliver it in excess to a
glass manifold. The oversize pump guarantees rapid system
response to changes in stack conditions. The monitor draws its
sample from the manifold and the excess is vented. By restricting
F-41
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 3 of 24
the flow at the vent, a slight positive pressure (2.5 - 7.5 cm
H20) is maintained within the manifold. If the pressure drop
across the sampling interface changes during sampling, a minor
adjustment at the vent maintains the manifold pressure.
A second manifold is used for the introduction of calibra-
tion gases. This calibration manifold pressure is regulated to
match the sample manifold and thus eliminate any pressure bias.
The monitor sample line has a selection valve that permits it to
draw from either manifold. Thus the monitor can be taken off
line, calibrated and returned to operation without interrupting
the sample flow.
The monitors are subjected to a multi-point calibration at
the start of the sampling period. The operator performs a zero
and span check daily. Any values that exceed + 5 percent of the
expected reading results in readjustment of the monitor. A
second multi-point calibration is performed at the end of the
sampling day to insure that no deterioration of monitor response
has occurred.
Quality assurance procedures for continuous monitors are
designed to insure:
0 Sample integrity,
Accurate monitor response, and
Precise and complete data capture.
o
o
F-42
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. Q
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 4 of 24
The sample integrity is demonstrated first by leak checking
the sampling interface from probe to distribution manifold. The
absolute leak rate is not to exceed 0.0005 m3 per minute. Next,
a known concentration of S02 is introduced at the probe. The
analyzer response to this gas is recorded for at least one
sampling cycle. The same gas is introduced directly into the
analyzer and compared with the response of the sample line integ-
rity tests. The two values must agree to within + 5 percent or
corrective action is taken.
Assessment of the accuracy of the analyzer is accomplished
by introducing know concentrations of the appropriate gas
directly to the analyzer.
Field data is continuously recorded by HEATH/SCHLUMBERGER
Model SR-204 strip chart recorders. The field operator validates
the chart with date and time during the daily calibrations.
Calibration values as well as comments and observations are
recorded in the operator's log book for future reference.
F-43
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No.0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page a of z*
PROPOSED SAMPLING METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION
OF PARTICULATE AND ARSENIC EMISSIONS FROM A COPPER SMELTER
The following method will be used in this test program.
Sampling procedures follow those described in Methods 5 and 108.
Tests will be conducted to determine filterable particulate
emissions and particulate and gaseous arsenic emissions using a
single sampling train.
SAMPLING APPARATUS
The sampling train to be used in these tests will meet
design specifications established by the Federal EPA and will be
assembled by PEDCo personnel. It will consist of:
Nozzle - Stainless steel (316) with sharp, tapered leading
edge and accurately measured round opening.
Probe - Borosilicate glass with a heating system capable of
maintaining a minimum gas temperature of 250°F at the exit
and during sampling.
Pitot Tube - Type S pitot tube that will meet all geometry
standards and will be attached to the probe to monitor stack
gas velocity.
Filter Holder - Pyrex glass with heating system capable of
maintaining a filter temperature of approximately 250°F.
Draft Gauge - An inclined manometer made by Dwyer with a
readability of 0.01 inches H20 in the 0 to 1 inch range
will be used.
*
EPA Method 108 has not been proposed and is presently in draft
form.
F-44
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 6 of 24
Impincfers - Six impingers connected in series with glass
ball joints. The first, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth
impingers will be the Greenburgh-Smith design, modified by
replacing the tip with a 1/2 inch I.D. glass tube extending
to 1/2 inch from the bottom of the flask. The second impin-
ger will be a Greenburgh-Smith design with the standard tip.
Metering System - Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers
capable of measuring temperature to within 5°F, dry gas
meter with 2 percent accuracy, and related equipment, to
maintain an isokinetic sampling rate and to determine sample
volume. The dry gas meter is made by Rockwell and the fiber
vane pump is made by Cast.
Barometer - Bourden tube type to measure atmospheric pres-
sures to + 0.1 inch Hg.
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
After selecting the sampling site and the minimum number of
traverse points, the stack pressure, temperature, moisture, and
range of velocity head will be measured according to procedures
described in the Federal Register.*
Approximately 200 grams of silica gel will be weighed and
placed in a sealed impinger prior to each test. Glass fiber
filters** (3-in. diameter) will be desiccated for at least 24
hours and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg on an analytical balance.
One hundred and fifty ml of deionized, distilled water will be
placed in each of the first two inpingers, and 200 ml of 10 per-
cent H202 will be placed in the third, fourth, anf fifth impin-
gers. The train will be set up with the probe as shown in Figure
Federal Register, Vol. 42, No. 160, August 18, 1977.
** Reeve Angel 934 AH.
F-45
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 7 of 24
1. The sampling train will be leak checked at the sampling site
prior to each test run by plugging the inlet to the nozzle and
pulling a 15 inch Hg vacuum, and at the conclusion of the test by
plugging the inlet to the nozzle and pulling a vacuum equal to
the highest vacuum reached during the test run.
The pitot tube and lines will be leak checked at the test
site prior to each test run and at the conclusion of each test
run. The check will be made by blowing into the impact opening
of the pitot tube until 3 or more inches of water are recorded on
the manometer and then capping the impact opening and holding it
for 15 seconds to assure it is leak free. The static pressure
side of the pitot tube will be leak checked using the same pro-
cedure, except suction will be used to obtain the 3 in. H20
manometer reading. Crushed ice will be placed around the impin-
gers to keep the temperature of the gases leaving the last
impinger at 68°F or less. The nozzle size will be selected to
maintain the isokinetic sampling rate below 1.0 cfm.
During sampling, stack gas and sampling train data will be
recorded at each sampling point and when significant changes in
stack flow condition occur. Isokinetic sampling rates will be
set throughout the sampling period with the aid of a nomograph
or calculator. All sampling data will be recorded, on the
Particulate Field Data Sheet (see Figure 2).
F-46
-------
THCIWnCTCR
SENSOR
REVERSE TYPE
PI TOT TUBE
THERMOMETER
ORIFICE
MANOMETER
to ID •*» <
.. VI .
^ o •
Figure 1. Particulate and arsenic sampling train.
SJ
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
n« 1 Ml 1 IIMK I
11*1 m» mtt
I'll '|l. -,!1 l» -ytll
1 • I 1 I • I > 1 I I I i 1 1 I
l t> -.n..^ l .j». ^(j2t«r«;Tr1,"il»l-ij-2*^—I ,£m \mm\'m' ,|JT .1 "' I™
I
00
irirc >M«M
iisa
1KH
vranr
•». i.
Figure 2. Emission testing field data.
c* < O
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. o
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 10 of 24
SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURE
The sampling train will be moved carefully from the test
site to the cleanup area. The weight of each impinger will be
determined prior to recovery for moisture determination. Sample
fractions will be recovered as follows:
Container No. 1 - The filter will be removed from its holder
and placed in a petri dish and sealed.
Container No. 2 - Loose particulate and acetone washings
from all sample-exposed surfaces prior to the filter will be
placed in a polyethylene container, sealed, and labeled.
Particulate will be removed from the probe with the aid of
a brush and acetone rinsing. The liquid level will be
marked after the container is sealed.
Container No. 3 - After the probe and all sample-exposed
surfaces prior to the filter have been rinsed with acetone,
an additional rinse with 0.1 N NaOH will be performed,
placed in a polyethylene container, sealed, and labeled.
The liquid level will be marked after the container is
sealed.
Container No. 4 - The contents of the first two impingers
will be transferred to a polyethylene container. Each
impinger will be rinsed twice with 30 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and
the rinse added to the container. The back-half of the
filter holder and connecting glassware will be rinsed twice
with 0.1 NaOH and the rinse added to the container. The
container will then be sealed, labeled, the liquid level
marked, and then stored.
Container No. 5 - The contents of the third, fourth, and
fifth impingers will be transferred to a polyethylene con-
tainer. Each impinger will be rinsed twice with deionized,
distilled water, the connecting glassware rinsed twice with
deionized, distilled water, and the rinses added to the
container. The container will be sealed, labeled, the
liquid level marked, and then stored.
F-49
-------
Section NO. Appendix A
Revision No. o
Date: July 2nr 19R2
Page 11 of 24
Container No. 6 - A minimum of 200 ml of the acetone will be
taken for blank analysis. The blank will be obtained and
treated in the same manner as the rinse.
Container No. 7 - A minimum of 200 ml of ieionized, distilled
water will be taken for blank analysis. The blank will be
obtained and treated in the same manner as the rinse.
Container No. 8 - A minimum of 200 ml of H2C>2 will be taken
for blank analysis. The blank will be obtained and treated
in the same manner as the rinse.
Container No. 9 - A minimum of 200 ml of 0.1 N NaOH will be
taken for blank analysis. The blank will be obtained and
treated in the same manner as the rinse.
The silica gel from the sixth impinger will be weighed and
recorded on the Sample Recovery and Integrity Data Sheet with
other pertinent data.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The following procedures will be used. These are fully
described in EPA Methods 5 and 108.
Container No. 1 - The filter and any loose particulate will
be dessicated for 24 hrs. to a constant weight and weighed
to the nearest 0.1 mg. After a final weight has been
obtained the filter will be digested in a 150 ml beaker
using 0.1 N NaOH followed by concentrated HN03. The solu-
tion will be filtered. The filtrate will be boiled and
evaporated to dryness. Nitric acid will then be added and
and the sample diluted before analysis by atomic absorption
spectrophotometry. If any solids remain on the filter, the
filter will be digested in a PARR acid digestion bomb using
HNO., and HF prior to analysis.
Container No. 2 - The acetone washings of the nozzle probe
and front half of the filter holder will be transferred to
a tared glass beaker, evaporated to dryness at ambient
temperature and pressure, dessicated for 24 hours to a
constant weight, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg.
F-50
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 12 of 24
Container No. 3 - The o.l N NaOH rinses of the probes and
exposed surfaces will be combined with the residue from
Container No. 2. The resulting solution will be diluted and
a 50 ml aliquot will be removed and digested using HNO,
before arsenic analyses.
Container No. 4 and No. 5 - The contents of these two con-
tainers will be diluted. An aliquot will be taken and
digested with HN03 before final dilution and atomic absorp-
tion analysis.
The term "constant weight" means a difference of no more
than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less tare weight, which-
ever is greater between two consecutive readings, with no less
than 6 hours of desiccation between weighings. All analytical
data are recorded on the Analytical Data Sheet and appropriate
Blank Data Sheet.
All blanks will be digested and analyzed using the same
procedures as the corresponding sample fraction.
The samples will be analyzed on an atomic absorption
spectrophotometer. The solutions will first be analyzed using
the flame techniques as outlined in EPA Method 108. However, if
the samples are below the flame detection limit, the furnace
technique (heated graphite furnace) will be employed. Possible
matrix effects for either method will be checked using the
"Method of Additions".
F-51
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. Q
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 13 of 24
SF6 TRACER STUDY
A tracer mass balance study will be conducted to estimate
the capture efficiency of the air curtain control system. A
suitable tracer will be quantitatively injected in selected
locations within the controlled area. Measurements of the tracer
concentration at the sampling point, combined with flow rate
measurements, will permit the calculation of the amount passing
the sampling point (i.e., the amount collected by the hood). The
collection efficiency can then be calculated from the amount
injected and the amount captured. The tracer technique, if
proven successful, could be utilized to quantitatively optimize
the secondary hood operation. Also, if successful, the tracer
will be used during the full field tests conducted in Phase II
to assure that a reasonable collection efficiency is being
achieved during the sampling program for SC>2 / particulate, and
arsenic capture efficiency and loadings.
Sulfur hexafluoride (SF,) has been selected as the tracer.
b
SF, is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas that is not flam-
mable and is completely nontoxic. Also SF, is stable up to a
temperature of 500°C (932°F). Additionally, the minimum detec-
tion limit for SF, is 5 parts per trillion using GC electron
capture analytical technique. Information furnished by Asarco
F-52
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
14 of 24
regarding the temperatures expected within the controlled area
indicate that thermal decomposition could not be expected.
SF6 analysis will be performed using a Perkin-Elmer Model
3920 gas chromatograph equipped with a Ni-63 electron capture
detector and a Valco gas sampling valve with a 1 ml sampling
loop. Operating conditions will be: nitrogen carrier gas (120
ml/min), injector and oven heated to 55°C, and detector heated
to 250°C. The analytical column will be an 8 ft. long by 1/8 in,
diameter nickel tube packed with 70/80 mesh molecular sieve 5A.
All sampling lines and connectors will be Teflon or stainless
steel.
An exponential dilution system will be used in constructing
calibration curves. Equipment required for the system calibra-
tion will include a mass flow meter, a magnetic stirrer and
stirbars, a Pyrex 1 liter round bottom flask, a tank of zero
grade nitrogen, and miscellaneous glass and Teflon tubes and
fittings.
The electron capture detector's response to SF, will be
6
determined with a conventional strip chart recorder. Peak
heights will be measured to determine response and compared to
calibration curves prepared using the exponential dilution sys-
tem immediately prior to analysis to determine actual concentra-
tions of SF,.
D
F-53
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
15 of 24
The electron capture detector has a linear response to
concentrations of SFg ranging from 10~7 to the minimum detectable
level of approximately 5 x 10~12. An exponential Dilution System
(as shown in Figure 1) will be used to prepare standards over
this concentration range. A one liter round bottomed flask is
used as a mixing chamber with a magnetically driven stirrer to
assure good agitation. Zero nitrogen flows through the system
at a constant rate. A known amount of gaseous SF, is then
6
injected into the flask and the time recorded. The concentration
of SFg in the flask at any time can then be calculated from the
equation:
-N
C = C -e
o
where CQ is the initial concentration of SF in the flask, N is
the number of gas changes, and e is a constant 2.7183. Calibra-
tions will be performed daily and will take approximately two
hours to generate the calibration curve.
In use, instrument response (peak height) is plotted against
calculated concentration on semi-log paper to obtain calibration
curves. Actual sample concentrations then can be found by com-
paring responses to the curve, or more accurately, calculated
from the slope of the curve and sample response.
F-54
-------
Appendix A
Section No.
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 16 of 24
SAMPLE
LOOP
ACTIVATED
CARBON
FILTER
ZERO
NITROGEN
DILUTION
FLASK
SAMPLING
VALVE
O
MAGNETIC
STIRRER
PERKIN-ELMER
GAS
CHROMATOGRAPH
MASS FLOWMETER
Figure 1. Exponential dilution system.
F-55
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No.0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 17 of 24
After the daily calibrations are completed, samples can be
analyzed approximately every 5 minutes. Numerous samples can be
analyzed daily.
A brief laboratory evaluation will be performed to determine
if SF, losses occur in the Tedlar bags to be used to collect the
actual samples. SF, will be placed in the sample bags and ana-
lyzed over a period of time to determine any losses. Moisture
should not be a problem since only ambient air moisture will be
in the gas.
Background tests to determine the presence of any SF6 will
be performed prior to the hood capture efficiency tests. Back-
ground tests will be obtained by collecting flue gas samples from
the exhaust duct and from the air around the converter mouth in
Tedlar bags and analyzing for SF,.
Tracer recovery tests will be performed by quantitatively
injecting a constant rate of SF, directly into the secondary
(capture) hooding and determining the SF, concentration and air
flow rates at the exhaust sampling location. This data will be
used to account for any system or measurement biases. Ideally
the amount injected should equal the amount measured in the
exhaust duct at the sampling point. About 2.5 cc/min of tracer
gas are needed to yield 1 ppb in 100,000 acfm.
F-56
-------
Section NO. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20. 1982
18 of 24
Figure 2 illustrates the equipment to be used to inject the
SFg at the designated traverse points. A constant pressure will
be maintained on the limiting orifice to ensure a constant injec-
tion flow rate. The limiting orifice will be calibrated prior to
and after each test run by using a bubble meter. SFfi injection
rates will be determined based on the air flow rate in the
secondary hood duct and the desired SFg concentration for accu-
rate analysis. Also, the temperature at each injection point
will be monitored during the injection of SFg to ensure that
decomposition is avoided. The tracer will be injected over a
selected time period or operation mode as required.
Integrated samples of the secondary hood flue gas will be
collected at the downstream sampling location. Samples will be
obtained by pulling a constant rate at the point of average
velocity in the exhaust duct into a leak-free Tedlar 15 liter
bag. Samples will be collected over a selected time period or
operational mode as required. Sampling rates will be dependent
on the selected sampling period. Figure 3 shows the sampling
train to be used to collect the samples. The sample bags will be
transferred to the onsite laboratory for immediate analysis.
F-57
-------
PRESSURE REGULATOR
TEFLON SAMPLE LINE
I
INJECTION PROBE
(3/8 1n. STAINLESS
TUBING)
i
un
oo
LIMITING
ORIFICE
THERMOCOUPLE
THERMOCOUPLE
LEAD WIRE
CYLINDER
OF SF,
DIGITAL
READOUT
-OO
tu o>
r* < O
n> n> ->. <-*•
VI -*.
_•. o
o 3
c,3*
C zo
K)
O
ro
*.
Figure 2. SFg injection apparatus.
vo
CO
M
(0
Cb
H-
X
-------
STAINLESS
STEEL PROBE
'•$
1
\,3
f
LEAK FREE
TEDLAR BAG
\ J
FLOW CONTROL
1 VALVE
t
-1 Trn r
TEFLON
SAMPLE LINE
TEFLON LINED
DIAPHRAM PUMP
T3O JO CO
o> o> o> n>
ua r* < o
ro ep -«•«-»•
..(/!-••
-*• o
O 3
NJ
O
r7 Z O
O •
N)
0(D
ID
00
to
Figure 3. SF, sampling train.
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. Q
Date: July 20. 1982
Page 2] of 24
PARTICLE SIZING AND SELECTED TRACE METAL ANALYSIS
A particle size run will be performed simultaneously with
a particulate sample run during an entire converter cycle. A
total of four entire converter cycles will be sampled during the
testing period. In addition particle size runs will be separately
performed during the slag blow and finish blow portions of each
converter cycle.
Sampling will be conducted following essentially the pro-
cedures outlined in the IP Protocal. Due to the nature of the
process some modifications to the IP Protocol will have to be
made, i.e. a reduction in the number of sample runs due to the
length of each converter cycle.
An Andersen heavy grain loading impactor (HGLI) attached to
a 15 ym cyclone precutter as shown in Figure A-l will be used to
collect samples over the entire converter cycle.
The Andersen HGLI and cyclone precutter combination separate
the particulate emissions into a total of five separate size
ranges which are approximately >15 ym, 15 ym to 11 ym, 11 ym to
6 ym, 6 ym to 1.5 ym, <1.5 ym. Each sample run will consist of
testing four sampling points of average velocity for about the
same period of time (- 2.5 hours each)
The five sample fractions collected during each sample run
will be separately recovered and each fraction will initially be
F-60
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 22
of 24
METER BOX
ACCELERATION
VENT TUBE-\ /-JET
PROBE TUBE
GLASS-FIBER
THIMBLE
»- FLOW
ISOKINETIC
SECOND-^ L FIRST PROBE
IMPACT ION IMPACT ION
STAGE STAGE
Figure A-l. Andersen Heavy Grain Loading impactor sampling train.
F-61
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. o
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 23 of 24
gravimetrically analyzed to determine the percent of the total
particulate in each size range. Each sample fraction will then
be analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AA) to determine
the concentration of six selected metals (arsenic, cadmium, lead,
antimony, selenium, and bismuth) in the gas stream. A Perkins-
Elmer Model 550 will be used to analyze the samples for the
selected trace metals.
During the slag blow and finish blow portions of each
converter cycle separate Andersen Mark III impactors (Figure
A-2) attached to a 15 ym cyclone precutter will be used to per-
form particle size runs. The Andersen Impactor and cyclone
precutter combination provides mine sample fractions. At the
completion of each sample run the nine sample fractions will be
separately recovered and each sample fraction will be analyzed
following the same procedure used for the Anderson HGLI sample
runs.
If the grain loading is heavy and causes overloading of
any stages of either impactor during a sample run it will be
replaced by another impactor cyclone combination sampler and
sampling continued.
F-62
-------
Section No. Appendix A
Revision No. 0
Date: July 20, 1982
Page 24 of 24
KETER BDX
PRE1HPAC10R
Figure A-2. Andersen Mark III impactor sampling train
with preimpactor and heating system.
F-63
-------
PEDCO ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
1 14B9 CHESTER HO AD
CINCINNATI. OHIO 48246
(813)782-4700
TELECOPIER (813) 782-48O7
PEDCo ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
EMISSION MEASUREMENT
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
Approved by:
^2^^/^
, Senior Vice President,
Corporate Quality
Assurance Coordinator
Division Director
, Division Quality
Assurance Coordinator
Revised January 1982
•RANCH OFFICES
CHESTER TOWERS
DALLAS. TEXAS
KANSAS crnr. MISSOURI
COLUMBUS. OHIO
DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA
?-64
-------
CONTENTS
Figures iii
Tables iv
List of Individuals Receiving the Emission Measurement v
Quality Assurance Plan
1.0 Introduction 1-1
2.0 Organization and Responsibilities 2-1
2.1 Director 2-1
2.2 Associate Director 2-1
2.3 Group Supervisor 2-3
2.4 Associate Group Supervisor 2-3
2.5 Quality Assurance Coordinator 2-3
2.6 Associate Quality Assurance Coordinator 2-4
2.7 Group Leaders 2-4
2.8 Project Managers 2-5
2.9 Quality Control Technician 2-5
2.10 Technicians 2-5
3.0 Methods 3-1
4.0 Chain of Custody 4-1
5.0 Quality Control 5-1
5.1 Accuracy 5-1
5.2 Precision 5-5
5.3 Data validation 5-5
5.4 Reports 5-9
5.5 Performance evaluations 5-9
5.6 Corrective action 5-9
6.0 Calibration 6-1
7.0 Preventive Maintenance 7-1
7.1 Short Interval Inspection 7-1
7.2 Replacement of Damaged or Obsolete Components 7-1
7.3 Scheduled Disassembly and Overhaul 7-2
8.0 Training 8-1
F-65
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
1-1 Organization of Corporate Quality Assurance 1-2
2-1 Organizational Chart 2-2
4-1 Three Part Sample Label 4-2
4-2 Particulate Sample Recovery and Integrity Sheet 4-3
5-1 Audit Report of Method 5 Meter Box 5-2
5-2 Example On-Site Quality Assurance Checklist 5-7
5-3 Example Emission Test Report Table of Contents 5-9
5-4 Example Emission Test Report Quality Assurance
Element Finder 5-10
6-1 Full-Scale Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Sheet 6-3
6-2 Post Test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Sheet 6-4
F-66
-------
TABLES
Number Page
5-1 Reagent Blank Analysis 5-4
6-1 Field Equipment Calibration 6-5
F-67
-------
LIST OF INDIVIDUALS RECEIVING THE
EMISSION MEASUREMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
Charles E. Zimmer
Lawrence A. Elfers
Thomas J. Wagner
K. Wade Mason
Chuck L. Bruffey
Phillip J. Schworer
Dale A. Hershey
John W. Prohaska
Thomas R. Clark
William G. DeWees
James L. Iverson
Bruce A. Armstrong
F-68
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Figure 1-1 presents the corporate quality assurance organiza-
tion and illustrates the relationship of the emission measurement
group's quality assurance activities to the total corporate
quality assurance effort. Mr. Zimmer is the Senior Vice President
of PEDCo Environmental. Mr. Zimmer is trained in statistics and
has over 20 years experience in the environmental field.
The principal function of the PEDCo Environmental Emission
Measurement Group is to provide reliable assessments of emissions
from stationary sources.
Quality assurance is the sum of all those activities in
which the emission measurement group is engaged in that will
ensure the validity of the data generated.
Quality assurance is not restricted to the development and
retention of quality control (QC) charts, but rather includes all
activities that affect the results produced. These activities
include, but are not restricted to, procurement of equipment and
supplies, maintenance and calibration of equipment, education of
personnel, sample handling, and reporting of results.
The purpose of this manual is to outline the quality assur-
ance activities of the PEDCo Environmental Emission Measurement
Group.
F-69
-------
Tl
-j
o
Field Studies
and Labortory
T. Wagner
Quality Assurance Activity
C.E. Zimmer, Coordinator
E.W. Koesters, Ass't. Coordinator
Engineering
D. Henz
Data Reduction,
Presentation
and Analysis
C. Zimmer
PEDCo
President
Report
Preparation
M. Phillips
Figure 1-1. Organization of corporate quality assurance.
-------
2.0 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The organization of the PEDCo Environmental Emission Measure-
ment Group is designed to provide an efficient flow of admini-
strative, technical, quality assurance, and advisory activities
throughout its operation.
The organization chart is presented as Figure 2-1, and the
responsibilities of the staff are outlined below.
2.1 DIRECTOR
The responsibilities of the Director are as follows:
0 Set objectives for the Field Studies/Laboratory Division.
0 Plan the Division's course and policies.
0 Organize the personnel, facilities, equipment, and
materials into a coherent organization that can fulfill
the Division's plans.
0 Integrate the various parts of the organization.
0 Measure the success in achieving the objectives.
0 Resolve problems.
2.2 ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR
The responsibilities of the Associate Director are as follows:
0 Coordinate the activities of the Field Studies/Laboratory
Division.
0 Primary administrative contact with regulatory and
accreditation agencies.
F-71
-------
I
«J
N)
W. DeWees
Training Director
L. Elfers, Director
E. Koesters, Assoc. Director
W. Mason
Group Supervisor
C. Bruffey
Associate Group Supervisor
T. Wagner
Quality Assurance Coordinator
T. Clark
Associate
Quality Assurance Coordinator
B. Armstrong
Quality Control Technician
P. Schworer
Group Leader
Compliance Testing
Project Managers
D. Hers hey
Group Leader
Organics
Project
Managers
J. Iverson
Group Leader
Technical Support
Technicians
J. Prohaska
Group Leader
Source Test Related
Project
Managers
Figure 2-1. Organizational chart.
-------
Assist the Director in the implementation and supervi-
sion of administrative operations.
Provide liaison with clients.
2.3 GROUP SUPERVISOR
The responsibilities of the Group Supervisor are as follows:
0 Set objectives for the Emission Measurement Group.
0 Plan the Group's course and policies.
0 Organize the personnel, facilities, equipment, and
materials into a coherent organization that can fulfill
the Group's plans.
0 Integrate the various parts of the organization within
the Group, Division, and Company.
0 Measure the success in achieving objectives.
0 Resolve problems.
2.4 ASSOCIATE GROUP SUPERVISOR
The primary responsibilities of the Associate Group Super-
visor are as follows:
0 Coordinate the activities of the Emission Measurement
Group.
0 Assist the Group Supervisor in the implementation and
supervision of administrative operations.
0 Provide liaison with clients.
0 Evaluate performance of the Group and advise Group
Supervisor of overall activities and performance.
2.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR
The responsibilities of the Quality Assurance Coordinator
are as follows:
0 Develop, coordinate, and evaluate the quality assurance
plans within the Division.
F-73
-------
0 Review performance evaluation results.
0 Evaluate methods and procedures.
0 Act as technical advisor to Group Supervisors.
0 Issue, prepare, and evaluate audit samples.
0 Develop quality assurance plans for special projects.
2.6 ASSOCIATE QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR
The responsibilities of the Quality Assurance Coordinator
are as follows:
0 Develop, coordinate, and evaluate the quality assurance
program for the Group.
0 Conduct routine checks on quality assurance items.
0 Review performance evaluation results.
0 Evaluate methods and procedures.
0 Act as technical advisor to Group Leaders.
0 Develop quality assurance plans for special projects.
2.7 GROUP LEADERS
The primary responsibilities of the Group Leaders are as
follows:
0 Coordinate activities of the specific group in the
areas of personnel assignments and project participa-
tion.
0 Provide technical guidance as required for project
managers.
0 Train Group personnel.
0 Perform as project directors and project managers.
0 Provide liaison with clients.
F-74
-------
2.8 PROJECT MANAGERS
The primary responsibilities of the Project Manager are as
follows:
0 Manage day to day activities of on-going projects.
0 Provide technical support to other groups as required.
0 Participate as a team member on selected projects.
2.9 QUALITY CONTROL TECHNICIAN
The primary responsibilities of the Quality Control Techni-
cian are as follows:
0 Oversee or perform all equipment calibrations.
0 Maintain all quality control charts and records.
0 Develop and revise quality control procedures.
2.10 TECHNICIANS
The primary responsibilities of the technicians are as
follows:
0 Participate as a team member on assigned projects.
0 Perform equipment calibrations, data collection, main-
tain records, etc., as required.
0 Perform assignments as assigned by project managers.
F-75
-------
3.0 METHODS
The PEDCo Environmental Emission Measurement Group normally
uses published test methods; e.g., New Source Performance Test
methods published in the Federal Register (40 CFR Part 60), and
methods adopted for state and local code enforcement. Specialized
test work often requires the development of special test methods
or modifications of methods that were developed for purposes
other than stationary source evaluation.
The most often used methods are reviewed and modified as
necessary. New Source Performance Test methods are kept current
through the use of the PEDCo Environmental Library which tabu-
lates changes to the New Source Performance Standards Compilation
Manual. Copies of the compilation manual are provided to all
Project Managers and Supervisory personnel in the Emission Mea-
surement Group. State and local regulations are kept current by
procuring copies from each subject agency whenever changes are
made. Copies of these regulations are maintained in a file cab-
inet located in the clerical area which supports the Emission
Measurement Group.
F-76
-------
4.0 CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples are recovered from the sampling train after each
test. Sample recovery is carried out in a suitable area shel-
tered from wind and dust to prevent contamination of samples.
Sample recovery procedures outlined in the applicable test
method are followed in detail (usually 40 CFR, Part 60). All
sample containers are identified using the appropriate section of
the three-part sample label (Figure 4-1). One section of the
sample label is attached to the field test data sheet for positive
identification purposes. After recovery, all sample containers
are sealed. The height of the liquid level is marked on all
containers containing liquid samples to indicate if any sample
was lost during shipment and to assist in quantitatively deter-
mining the correct sample volume when sample is lost. Data
relative to samples, collected during each test, are recorded on
a sample recovery and integrity data sheet (Figure 4-2). Samples,
along with the sample recovery and integrity data sheets, are
under the custody of the Project Manager until custody is trans-
ferred when samples are turned over to the laboratory. Sample
storage boxes with padlocks are used to store samples in the
field and to transport samples to the laboratory. Custody pro-
cedures followed in the laboratory are presented in the PEDCo
Environmental Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan.
F-77
-------
I
~J
00
PLANT CITY 54
PN: SAMPIE TYPE
DATE RUN NUMBER
FRONT RINSE D FRONT FILTER Q FRONT SOLUTION D
BACK RINSE D BACK FILTER D BACK SOLUTION D
RINSE IFVFI MARKED
VOLUME: INITIAI FTNAI
to
Cl EAN-IIP RY £
y
CORRESPONDING BIANK CONTAINER NO, , #
.
o
o
z
CO
or -
LLJ
t—
_j
li.
a
i
ac
tt
•8
CO *^ CO
co •«*• z *V
3 10 = 10
mm
Figure 4-1. Three part sample label.
-------
PARTICULAR SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
Simple location
Run number
Filter number(s)
Impingers
Final volume (wt)
Initial volume {wt)
Net volume (wt)
Description of Impinger water
Total moisture
Sample date
Recover^ date
Recovered by
MOISTURE
Silica gel
nl(g) Final wt
»l(g) Initial wt
»l(g) Net wt
% spent
8
9
9
9
Filter container number(s)
Description of partlculate on filter
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Sealed
Probe rinse
container no.
blank
container no.
Impinger contents
container no.
blank
container no.
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
narked
Liquid level
Burked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
wrked
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by
Remarks
Date
Figure 4-2. Particulate sample recovery and integrity sheet.
F-79
-------
5.0 QUALITY CONTROL
Reliability in stationary source testing is maintained
through strict adherence to quality control procedures. PEDCo's
procedures are designed to control both the accuracy and preci-
sion of the test results.
5.1 ACCURACY
Accuracy is maintained through rigorous calibration proce-
dures using the standards specified in the methods and/or Volume
III of the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measure-
ment Systems, use of control samples where appropriate, and per-
formance and systems audits. The accuracy of source test capa-
bilities is monitored through voluntary participation in EPA's
stationary source audits for coal and Methods 3, 5, 6, and 7.
5.1.1 Performance Audit
Performance audits are conducted during the sampling and
analytical phases of the test program. The volumetric flow
metering device is audited during the sampling phase using a
critical orifice. This audit is conducted once on each metering
device during each field test, using procedures outlined in
Volume III of the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Mea-
surement Systems. Figure 5-1 illustrates the data presentation and
calculations format for a critical orifice audit of a Method 5
F-80
-------
DATE:
AUDIT REPORT DRY GAS METER
CLIENT:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (Ph.r): 1n.
ORIFICE NO.
Ng NETER BOX NO.
PRETEST v
ORIFICE K. FACTOR: AUDITOR:
Orifice Dry gas
manometer meter
reading reading
AH VVf
in H20 ft3
Temperatures
Ambient Dry gas meter
T.i/Taf T ™fi
"F »F
Outlet
To/7of
Duration
of
run
9
min
Dry gas Average temperatures
meter Ambient
volume
V T,
in a
ft3 -F
Dry gas V
meter m$td
°F ft3
V",c,
ft3
Audit
>
deviation
"std
07.647)( Vm )(Pbar * AH/13.6)
(Tm * 460)
Audit -y
y
in
y
Xct
(1203H
p
(7a
)( * >
*460)'^"
•Y deviation, J
(T audit
• Y pre-test)(100'.)
(> audit)
Audit i Dust be In the range, pre-test y *0.05
Figure 5-1. Audit report of Method 5 meter box.
F-81
-------
meter box. Barometers, thermometers, nozzles, and other equip-
ment used during the field test phase are audited to ensure the
collection of acceptable data. Copies of all internal quality
control procedures and data sheets are contained in the PEDCo
Environmental Emission Measurements Quality Control Procedures
Manual.
Blanks of reagents used to collect, recover, and analyze
samples are collected to check the quality and ensure that
reagents meet criteria established in the test methods. Table
5-1 presents results of the analyses of acetone and water blanks
that were collected during a particulate test program.
When analyses are conducted in the field, audit and control
samples are analyzed to ensure the accuracy of results. Samples
analyzed in the laboratory are subject to the stringent quality
controls exercised in the laboratory. (See PEDCo Environmental
Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan.)
5.1.2 Systems Audit
The systems audit consists of an on-site qualitative inspec-
tion and review of the total measurement system. This inspection
is conducted on a random basis by the quality assurance coordi-
nator or another senior individual with extensive background
experience in source sampling. During the systems audit, the
auditor observes the procedures and techniques of the field team
in the following general areas:
0 Setting up and leak testing the sampling train
0 Isokinetic sampling check of the sampling train
F-82
-------
TABLE 5-1. REAGENT BLANK ANALYSIS
Type of blank
Particulate blanks:
Acetone
Water
Particle size blanks:
Acetone
Analytical blanks:
Ether/chloroform
Container
No.
1228A
1229A
3823A
BU630
Volume of
blank, ml
537
500
221
150
Weight after
evaporation and
desiccation,
mg/ga
+0.0061
+0.0052
+0.0074
0.004
Comments
Tolerance: +_0.01 mg/g.
F-83
-------
0 Final leak check of train
0 Sample recovery
Results of the systems audit are summarized in a written report
and the Quality Assurance Coordinator initiates any needed cor-
rective actions.
5.2 PRECISION
Acceptable precision is maintained through strict adherence
to acceptable limits of difference in replicate measurements at
each step of the procedure from initial calibration of sampling
equipment to the final analytical determinations. These limits
are specified in the methods and in Volume III of the Quality
Assurance Handbook.
5.3 DATA VALIDATION
Data validations are accomplished by using internal quality
control checks and performing internal systems, performance, and
data audits. For each major measurement parameter, the frequency
and type of quality control checks with control limits and cor-
rective action are established. An example of an internal quality
control check would be to analyze a standard solution after every
tenth analysis for projects requiring a large number of repeti-
tious analyses. Audit samples (such as those available from
EMSL/RTP) are used in projects where only a few analyses are
performed in the project. If the control sample analytical
results are not within the control limits, corrective action has
to be taken to identify and resolve the problem before continuing
with analyses.
F-84
-------
PEDCo performs an internal system audit on every source test
project. Field calibration checks are performed on the control
module (using a critical orifice), thermometer, thermocouples,
and digital readouts. Visual inspections of pitot tubes, glass-
ware, and other equipment are also made. Figure 5-2 is a check-
list for on-site calibrations for typical source test projects.
The main purpose of a systems audit is to insure that the measure-
ment system will generate valid data if operated properly. By
performing pretest, on-site, and post-test calibrations of the
measurement systems, data validation checks on the performance of
the test equipment can be easily performed.
Data reduction and reporting have been shown to be great
potential sources of system error. Most of PEDCo"s test method
calculations are performed by a validated computer program to
minimize error. The field data sheets are also set up on a
standard computer card to allow accurate input of data into the
computer by individuals unfamiliar with testing procedures. The
data printout is then validated by comparison with the field and
analytical data sheets. In addition, hand calculation checks are
generally made to validate the computer output.
All data generated by each phase of a laboratory or field
sampling program are reviewed by a senior reviewer. The data
must be signed off by the senior reviewer prior to releasing the
data for report preparation.
Material balances (such as water, sulfur, etc.) can be
performed on certain sources to validate measured data. For
F-85
-------
Audit Name:
ON-SITE AUDIT DATA SHEET
Date:
Auditor:
Equipment
Meter box
Inlet thermo.
Meter box
outlet thermo.
Impinger
thermometer
Stack
thermometer
or
Thermocouple
Orsat
analyzer
Trip
balance
Barometer
Reference
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTK-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
stack temp.
% 02 in
ambient air
IOLM std.
weight
Corrected*
NWS value
Reference
Value
20.8°*
Value
Determined
Deviation
Max. Allowable
Deviation
56F
5°F
2°F
7°F
See table
0.7%
0.5 grams
0.20 in. Hg
Reference temp. °F
Max. deviation CF
32-140
7
141-273
9
274-406
11
407-540
13
541-673
15
674-760
17
* Correction factor:
NWS value (in. Hg) - [Altitude (ft)/1000(ft/in. Hg)] + 0.74 in. Hg**
** 0.74 in. Hg is the nominal correction factor for the reference barometer
against which the field barometer was calibrated.
If It is not feasible to perform the audit on any piece of equipment, record
"N/A" in the space provided for the data.
Figure 5-2. Checklist for on-site calibrations.
F-86
-------
example, the F-factor Method can be used to relate the fuel feed
to a combustion source and the measured flue gas flow rate. Data
validation methods have been documented for other types of sources
also.
5.4 REPORTS
All final reports are reviewed by the Group Supervisor.
Each report contains all the quality assurance data generated
during the course of the project. In essence, each emission test
report is also a quality assurance report to management. Figure
5-3 illustrates the Table of Contents and Figure 5-4 illustrates
the Quality Assurance Element Finder present in each emission
test report.
5.5 PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
PEDCo Environmental participates in EPA's audit program for
stationary source measurements. These audits include combustion
gas samples for Method 3; samples of coal, S09, and NO for
£* yv
analysis; and a critical orifice for Method 5. The results of
these audits are reviewed by the Division Director and the Quality
Assurance Coordinator and discussed with the Group Supervisor and
the analysts.
5.6 CORRECTIVE ACTION
PEDCo has two methods for corrective action. The first is
the use of control limits. Examples of control limits are audit
sample results, control sample results, and calibration results.
F-87
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Figures v
Tables vi
Quality Assurance Element Finder i*
1. Introduction 1-1
2. Project Summary 2-1
3. Process Operation 3-1
3.1 Process description 3-1
3.2 Environmental control devices tested 3-1"?
3.3 Process data 3-16
4. Sample Locations and Test Methods 4-1
.1 Barton oxide process baghouses No. 1 and No. 2 4-1
.2 Entoleter scrubber outlet 4-3
.3 Baghouse No. 1 4-5
.4 Baghouse No. 2 4-5
.5 Baghouse No. 3 4-7
.6 Carter-Day baghouse 4-8
.7 Velocity and gas temperature 4-6
.6 Molecular weight 4-6
.9 Particulate matter 4-10
.10 Lead 4-10
Summary of Results 5-1
5.1 Barton oxide process baghouses 5-2
5.2 Entoleter scrubber outlet 5-7
5.3 Baghouse No. 1 outlet 5-11
5.4 Baghouse No. 2 outlet 5-12
5.5 Baghouse No. 3 outlet 5-16
5.6 Carter-Day baghouse outlet 5-20
Quality Assurance 6-1
Appendix A Computer printout and sample calculations A-l
Appendix B Field data B-l
Appendix C Laboratory results C-l
Appendix D Sampling and analytical procedures D-l
Appendix E Calibration procedures and results £-1
Appendix F Quality assuranr* summary F-l
Appendix G Project participants and activity loej C-l
Figure 5-3. Example Emission Test Report Table of Contents
F-88
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE CLEMENT FINDER
(1) Title page
(2) Table of contents
(3) Project description
(4) Project organization and responsi-
bilities
(5) QA objective for measurement data
in terms of precision, accuracy, com-
pleteness, representativeness and
comparability
(6) Sampling procedures
(7) Sample custody
(6) Calibration procedures and frequency
(9) Analytical procedures
(10) Data reduction, validation, and
reporting
(11) Internal quality control checks and
frequency
(12) Performance and system audits and
frequency
(13) Preventive maintenance procedures and
schedules
(14) Specific routine procedures used
to assess data precision, accuracy and
completeness of specific measurement
parameters involved
Location
Section Page
ii
1 1-1
Appendix F F-3
Appendix F F-3
Appendix D D-l
Appendix C C-l
Appendix E E-l
Appendix D D-l
Appendix F F-4
Appendix F F-5
Appendix F F-4
Appendix F F-6
Appendix F F-5
Appendix F F-6
(15) Corrective action
(16) Quality assurance reports to management Appendix F P-7
Figure 5-4. Example emission test report quality assurance element finder
F-89
-------
6.0 CALIBRATION
All sample train components requiring calibration are cali-
brated at the recommended interval using approved methods.
Calibration procedures for all components are documented and are
contained in the PEDCo Environmental Emission Measurements
Quality Control Procedures Manual. Standardized calibration
procedures are in accordance with calibration criteria outlined
in the test method and Volume III of the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, EPA-600/4-77-027b,
The following sample train components are calibrated using
standardized procedures.
0 Pitot tube
0 Differential pressure gauge
0 Barometer
0 Rotameter (rate meter)
0 Low temperature thermometer
0 Stack temperature thermometer
0 Digital indicator
0 Thermocouple
0 Dry gas meter thermometer
0 Method 7 collection flask
0 Wet test meter
0 Sampling nozzles
F-90
-------
0 Orsat analyzer
0 Method 5 meter box
0 Method 6 meter box
Calibration procedures for special equipment and components such
as the analytical system used in EPA test Method 25 are calibrated
using procedures tailored to the specific system based on accepted
methods published in the literature or manufacturer's specifica-
tions. These special purpose calibration procedures are docu-
mented in the Quality Control Procedures Manual.
The general calibration program consists of conducting a
full-scale laboratory calibration procedure on each new or re-
paired component requiring calibration, prior to its use in the
field.
At the completion of a field test, each component requiring
calibration receives a post-test calibration check. Any com-
ponent not meeting the calibration criteria is thoroughly checked
and calibrated using the full-scale laboratory procedure.
Figures 6-1 and 6-2 present example data sheets for a full-scale
laboratory calibration and a post-test calibration check,
respectively, for a dry gas meter used in Method 5 testing.
Each calibration data sheet contains the criteria that must be
met.
The results of equipment calibrations are included in each
test report. Table 6-1 summarized the calibration data for
equipment used for a Method 5 test.
F-91
-------
#11
MDTJCU.1TI UAMM
H> IIHlAl
KTCI Ml 10
•uoKnuc
U«k
u
»* S 1«. NfO).
m ) ««. N( C»
o.w. c<».
Tn.Tig
Orlfltf
Mtanrtf
Mtting
*H
IK HjO
O.i
1.0
1.5
r.c
1.0
4.0
VeliM
•tt t*n
•rttr
».
ftj
»el*»
«rjr ft>
• t»r
%
ft'
TtBprr(twrtt
"ta»t tt iT
•It'
•t
0'] %H «Hf
Tin el
',
•r
Dwtltt
•r
*f*r«ft
1«
•r
OwttloA
•f
Ull
9
•In
tocw*
Mtting
1n
*
> Kjit net 4t«1itt by Mr* ttan *0.0? >. A*tr»gt
«» Kilt net «t.(«tf >> «)t th»n O.U (n H?C
^
4N»
fi NjO
1
o.s
1 0
t C
In
1.0
«.c
t
( \ )( ffc )(% • «*0)
( »d )(>fc « iH/ll.tXI,, » *60)
4 — — M j! |
in )( )
( )( M )
( H 1( )
{ )( J( )
( )( )( )
( 11 )( )
( )( )( )
( )( tt )
J if HI
1 11 11 I
1 J( Jl }
JM
(O.OJ17)( «H )
I % )t% « «*o>
)( )
11 H
I tr )
( >( )
( )(
( )(
I H
1 )(
( X
f )(
1 )(
1 M J
»
•(i, • aouffp
< '. » J
"{ H )T
J ~-" \1
11 4T
J
)i )T
J
H JT
J
If »f
U
• II l>
p
Figure 6-1. Full-scale dry gas meter calibration data sheet.
F-92
-------
PARTICIPATE SAMPLING METER BOX
POST-TEST CALIBRATION
BATE: .
IAROHETR1C PRESSURE
PLANT:
In. Hg
PROJECT MANAGER:
METER BOX NO.
PRETEST V: _
PROJECT NO. _
CALIBRATOR:
AH*:
Orifice
nanometer
setting
•
AH
1n. H20
Met test
meter
volume
V.
ft3
Dry gas
•eter
volume
Vd
ft3
Temperatures
Net test
•eter
\
•F
Dn
•Jnlet
Td1
•F
i gas meter
Outlet
7dl
•F
Average
\
•F
Vacuum
setting
••
1n. Hg
Duration
of run
f
inin
Post-test average***
V
AHP
bar
T, * 460 )
o
(0.0317)( AH
* 460)
*460)( 0 )|
)(
H
_)
X
)(
)(
)(
)(
)(
•To be the average AH used during the test series.
••To be the highest vacuum used during the test series.
•••Post-test Y nust be within the range, pre-test y *O.C
Post-test AH9 must be within the range, pre-test AH? *0.15
Figure 6-2. Post test dry gas meter calibration data sheet.
F-93
-------
TABLE 6-1. FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
Equipment
Meter box
Meter box
Meter box
Meter box
Meter box
Pi tot tube
Pi tot tube
Pi tot tube
Pi tot tube
Pi tot tube
Pi tot tube
I.D.
No.
FB-2
FB-3
FB-4
FB-6
FB-8
179
180
185
187
189
192
Calibrated
against
Wet test meter
Standard pi tot tube
Allowable
deviation
AY prea + 0.020
AH
-------
TABLE 6-1 (continued)
Equipment
Thermocouple
Thermocouple
Thermocouple
Thermocouple
Digital
indicator
Orsat
analyzer
Trip balance
Barometer
I.D.
No.
129
164
256
259
124
125
219
232
198
225
Calibrated
against
ASTM reference
thermometer
Millivolt signals
Standard gas
Type S weights
NBS traceable
barometer
Allowable
deviation
+ 1.5*
0.5*
+0.5%
+0.5 g
0.20 in. Hg
post-test
Actual
deviation
0.70
1.1
0.5
0.07
Avg. 0.13%
Avg. 0.22%
Avg. -0.10%
0.1%
0.0 g
0.00 in.
Hg
Within
allowable
1 imits
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Comments
)2 and C02 are the
higher deviation
(continued)
-------
TABLE 6-1 (continued)
Equipment
Dry gas
thermometer
Probe nozzle
I.D.
No.
FB-2
FB-3
FB-4
FB-6
FB-8
CIM-3
6XXX
C2M-4
C2M-2
C2M-P
2-103
CIH-3
Calibrated
against
Reference thermom-
eter type ASTM 2F
or 3F
•
Caliper
Allowable
deviation
Dn +_ 0.004 in.
Actual
deviation
I 1.2°F
0 1.4°F
I 1.1°F
0 2.0°F
I 1.1°F
0 1.0°F
I 0.8°F
0 1.4°F
I 1.0'F
0 2.1°F
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
Within
allowable
1 imits
/
y
Jj
/
/
'
^
/
Comments
I = inlet thermom-
eter
0 = outlet thermom-
eter
Nozzles for particle-
size tests were
labeled according to
run numbers
I
vo
-------
7.0 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
All equipment used in emission measuring systems must be
maintained in good operating order. In order to achieve this
objective a good preventive maintenance program is necessary.
PEDCo's preventive maintenance program is composed of 3 major
components consisting of: short interval inspection; replacement
of obsolete or damaged components; and scheduled disassembly and
overhaul. Procedures used in this program follow those outlined
in Maintenance Calibration and Operation of Isokinetic Source
Sampling Equipment, Publication No. APTD-05-76 and Volume III of
the Quality Assurance Manual.
7.1 SHORT INTERVAL INSPECTION
The short interval inspection program consists of inspecting
each component of the sampling train after each job. This
inspection is accomplished after the post-test calibration check
and includes operating and inspecting each component to detect
damage.
7.2 REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED OR OBSOLETE COMPONENTS
Replacement of damaged, worn-out or obsolete components are
made whenever required. A red tag system is also used which
alerts maintenance personnel to damaged or worn-out components
. F-97
-------
detected in the field. The red tag contains a written description
of the problem along with the equipment operator's name.
7.3 SCHEDULED DISASSEMBLY AND OVERHAUL
All mechanical components in the sampling systems are dis-
assembled, inspected, cleaned, and overhauled annually or more
frequently, if necessary.
F-98
-------
8.0 TRAINING
It is corporate policy that each year each professional
employee is encouraged to attend one short course or its equivalent
specific to the employee's professional responsibilities.
Each new employee undergoes an orientation and on-the-job
training period before being assigned independent duties. Addi-
tionally, institution of new techniques, modification of proce-
dures, or the acquisition of new equipment is accompanied by
appropriate in-house, or if necessary, extramural training.
Selected personnel are also trained in tasks different from
their regular assignments.
F-99
-------
PEDCO ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
1 1499 CHESTER ROAD
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45246
1513)782-4700
TELECOPIER (513) 762-4BO7
PEDCo ENVIRONMENTAL, IMC. LABORATORY
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION
ACCREDITATION NO. 49
'•/ i- '- •'
Approved by: / ///f / a j/, V ; ->j ? i '•• u _ , Senior Vice President
, .' Corporate Quality
'-/ Assurance Coordinator
>r-~#*^~±+~e^ A E&.^i^ i Division Director
, Division Quality
Assurance Coordinator
Revised January 1982
BRANCH OFFICES
DALLAS. TEXAS COLUMBUS. OHIO
CHESTER TOWERS KANSAS CITY. MISSOURI DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA
F-100
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures
List of Individuals Receiving the Laboratory Quality
Assurance Plan
1.0 Introduction 1-1
2.0 Laboratory Organization and Responsibilities 2-1
2.1 Director 2-1
2.2 Associate Director 2-3
2.3 Quality Assurance Coordinator 2-3
2.4 Senior Industrial Hygienist (CIH) 2-3
2.5 Group Supervisor 2-3
2.6 Group Leaders 2-5
2.7 Sample Custodian/Quality Control Clerk 2-5
2.8 Analysts 2-5
2.9 Laboratory Clerk 2-7
3.0 Methods 3-1
4.0 Chain of Custody 4-1
4.1 Sample Receiving 4-1
4.2 Sample Analyses 4-1
4.3 Sample Record Keeping 4-6
5.0 Quality Control 5-1
5.1 Accuracy 5-1
5.2 Precision 5-3
5.3 Corrective Measures 5-3
5.4 Performance Evaluation 5-9
5.5 Data Validation 5-9
5.6 Reports 5-9
6.0 Training 6-1
7.0 Instrument Maintenance and Calibration 7-1
7.1 Inorganic Section 7-1
7.2 Organic Section 7-1
8.0 Glassware Cleaning Procedures 8-1
8.1 Inorganic Section 8-1
8.2 Organic Section 8-1
9.0 Safety Procedures 9-1
9.1 Laboratory Conduct 9-1
9.2 Fire Prevention 9-1
9.3 Prevention of Poisoning 9-2
9.4 Personal Safety 9-2
9.5 Safety Equipment 9-3
9.6 General 9-3
F-101
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
1-1 Organization of Corporate Quality Assurance 1-2
2-1 Organizational Chart 2-2
2-2 Quality Assurance Checklist 2-4
2-3 Example of Reagent Procurement Record 2-6
4-1 Example of Sample Receipt and Record Sheet 4-2
4-2 Example of Sample Analysis Requisition and 4-3
Record Sheet
4-3 Example of Sample Control Record 4-4
4-4 Example of Laboratory Data Record 4-5
5-1 Accuracy Control Chart 5-2
5-2 Precision Control Chart 5-4
5-3 Quality Control Report - Matrix Spike 5-5
5-4 Quality Control Report - Duplicate Analysis - 5-6
Organic
5-5 Quality Control Report - Charcoal Tubes 5-7
5-6 Quality Control Report of Accuracy - Inorganic 5-8
5-7 Quality Control Report of Precision - Inorganic 5-8
F-102
-------
LIST OF INDIVIDUALS RECEIVNG THE
LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
Charles E. Ziiraner
Lawrence A. Elfers
Eugene W. Koesters
Thomas J. Wagner
Craig H. Caldwell
Harry W. Jess
Ida J. Bennett
Dwight R. Hayes
F-103
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Figure 1-1 presents the corporate quality assurance organiza-
tion and illustrates the relationship of the Laboratory Group's
quality assurance activities to the total corporate quality
assurance effort. Mr. Zimmer is the Senior Vice President of
PEDCo Environmental. Mr. Zimmer is trained in statistics and has
over 20 years experience in the environmental field.
The principal function of the PEDCo Environmental Laboratory
is to provide data that is:
0 representative,
0 accurate,
0 precise,
0 complete,
0 comparable,
0 defensible, and
0 on time.
The management of PEDCo Environmental is committed to these
objectives and has a policy of producing data of documented high
quality.
Quality assurance is the sum of all those activities in
which the laboratory is engaged that will ensure the validity of
the information generated.
Quality assurance is not restricted to the development and
retention of quality control (QC) charts for precision and accu-
racy, but rather includes all laboratory activities that affect
the results produced. These activities include, but are not
restricted to, the choice of methods, education of personnel,
handling of specimens, and reporting of results.
The purpose of this manual is to outline the quality assu-
rance activities of the PEDCo Environmental Laboratory.
F-104
-------
I
M
O
Field Studies
and Labortory
T. Wagner
Quality Assurance Activity
C.E. Zimner, Coordinator
E.W. Koesters, Ass't. Coordinator
Engineering
D. Henz
Data Reduction,
Presentation
and Analysis
C. Zimmer
Report
Preparation
M. Phillips
Figure 1-1. Organization of corporate quality assurance.
-------
2.0 LABORATORY ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The organization of the PEDCo Environmental Laboratory is
designed to provide an efficient flow of administrative, tech-
nical, quality assurance, and advisory activities throughout its
operation.
The organizational chart is presented as Figure 2-1, and the
responsibilities of the staff are outlined below.
2.1 DIRECTOR
The responsibilities of the Director are as follows:
0 Set objectives for the Field Studies/Laboratory Division.
0 Plan the Division's course and policies.
0 Organize the personnel, facilities, equipment, and
materials into a coherent organization that can fulfill
the Division's plans.
0 Integrate the various parts of the organization.
0 Measure the success in achieving the objectives.
0 Resolve problems.
2.2 ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR
The responsibilities of the Associate Director are as follows:
0 Coordinate the activities of the Field Studies/Laboratory
Division.
0 Primary administrative contact with regulatory and
accreditation agencies.
0 Assist the Director in the implementation and supervision
of administrative operations.
0 Provide lia.ison with clients.
F-106
-------
LABORATORY
L. ELFERS, DIRECTOR
E. KOESTERS, ASSOC. DIRECTOR
M. KARAFFA (CIH)
SR. INDUSTRIAL
HYGIENIST
S. GORSKI
CLERK/TYPIST
J_
i
M
o
C. CALDWELL
GROUP SUPERVISOR
INORGANIC
GROUP LEADER
INORGANIC
•ANALYSTS
T. WAGNER
QUALITY ASSURANCE
COORDINATOR
D. WHITE
SAMPLE CUSTODIAN
H. JESS (ACTING)
GROUP SUPERVISOR
ORGANIC
J_
GROUP LEADER
AIR
_L
GROUP LEADER
WATER
1
ANALYSTS
I
ANALYSTS
Figure 2-1. Organizational chart.
-------
2.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR
The responsibilities of the Quality Assurance Coordinator
are as follows:
0 Develop, coordinate, and evaluate the quality assurance
program.
0 Conduct routine checks on quality assurance items
(Figure 2-2).
0 Review performance evaluation results.
0 Evaluate methods and procedures.
0 Act as technical advisor to Group Supervisors.
0 Issue, prepare, and evaluate audit samples.
0 Develop quality assurance plans for special projects.
2.4 SENIOR INDUSTRIAL HYGIENIST (CIH)
The responsibilities of the Senior Industrial Hygienist are
as follows:
0 Interpret AIHA accreditation requirements and establish
appropriate company policy.
0 Advise Group Supervisors on all industrial hygiene
activities of the laboratory.
0 Assist the Quality Assurance Coordinator in the
design of the entire Laboratory Quality Assurance
Plan.
2.5 GROUP SUPERVISOR
The responsibilities of the Group Supervisors are as follows:
0 Set objectives for the laboratory.
0 Plan the laboratory's course and policy.
0 Organize the laboratory personnel and facilities.
0 Evaluate the success of the laboratory.
0 Serve as project director.
F-108
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST
ITEM
SAMPLE LOG
ANALYSIS REQUISITION BOOK
PROCUREMENT LOG
DATA FILES
Q.C. CHARTS
REAGENTS :
A) NEW ITEMS DATED
B) OUTDATED ITEMS REMOVED
MAINTENANCE & CALIBRATION RECORDS
A) AA SPECTROPHOTOMETERS
B) BALANCES
C) HYDROTHERMOGRAPH
D) BOMB CALORIMETER
E) SPECTROPHOTOMETERS
F) GC, GC/MS
METHODS MANUALS
Q.A. MANUAL UPDATE
TRAINING RECORDS
GENERAL PROCEDURES
CLEANLINESS
SAFETY
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS
(PAT, WP, SO,, NO , DGM, COAL,
METHOD 3)
FREQUENCY DATE
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
YEARLY
YEARLY
YEARLY
RANDOM
RANDOM
RANDOM
AS RECEIVED
Figure 2-2. Quality assurance checklist,
F-109
-------
2.6 GROUP LEADERS
The responsibilities of the Group Leaders are as follows:
0 Determine the technical methods to be used.
0 Direct the day-to-day work.
0 Handle personnel matters.
0 Anticipate problems.
0 Troubleshoot.
0 Review reports for technical accuracy.
0 Manage projects as assigned.
0 Train the analysts.
2.7 SAMPLE CUSTODIAN/QUALITY CONTROL CLERK
The responsibilities of the Sample Custodian/Quality Control
Clerk are as follows:
0 Receive and log samples entering the laboratory.
0 Maintain custody records.
0 Proper storage of samples.
0 Document custody changes in the laboratory.
0 Receive and log reagents entering the laboratory
(Figure 2-3).
0 Maintain Quality Control Charts.
0 Alert Quality Assurance Coordinator to any unusual
trends on Quality Control Charts.
2.8 ANALYSTS
The responsibilities of the Analysts are as follows:
0 Perform sampling and analyses according to approved
PEDCo methods.
F-110
-------
Item Description
Qty.
P.O.
No.
PEDCo ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
Reagent Procurement Record
Date
Ord . Rec .
Lot No.
Vendor
Expiration
Date
Comments
Figure 2-3. Example of reagent procurement record.
-------
Alert the Group Leader to any analytical problems and
document the problems on the data sheet.
Perform routine maintenance and calibration of instru-
ments.
Prepare reagents.
2.9 LABORATORY CLERK
The responsibilities of the Laboratory Clerk are as follows:
0 Maintain records.
0 Maintain the Project Status Board.
0 Perform general clerical duties.
F-112
-------
3.0 METHODS
The PEDCo Environmental Laboratory normally uses published
methods, e.g., Federal Register methods for Environmental Pro-
tection Agency (EPA) Compliance analyses, NIOSH publications for
industrial hygiene samples, and various other regularly accepted
analytical references such as those of the ASTM. If a different
method, or a change to an existing method is needed, the altera-
tion is documented in the PEDCo Laboratory Method Series Manual.
Each procedure accepted for use in the PEDCo Environmental Lab-
oratory is entered in the manual along with the following legend:
PEDCo ENVIRONMENTAL METHOD CONTROL
Parameter Method
Use approved by Date
Termination approved by Date
The most often used methods are reviewed and changed as necessary.
These accepted methods have been collected in two identical
sets: one as the master laboratory control document, the other
as the working copy in the laboratory. As new individual methods
attain more frequent use, they are reviewed, changed as necessary,
and included as PEDCo approved methods. All PEDCo approved
methods are reviewed at least annually and reapproved for use.
The front page of each approved method tracks the dates at which
changes to the method have been introduced and dates on which
the method has been reviewed.
The methods which PEDCo Environmental, Inc. routinely uses
for analysis are selected from these publications:
1. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes.
U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1979, Publication No.
EPA-600/4-79-020.
2. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods. U.S. EPA SW-846, 1980.
F-113
-------
3. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement
Systems, Volumes I, II, iTflEPA-600/9-76-005, EPA-
600/4-77-027a, and EPA-600/4-77-027b.
4. Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis
of Pollutants. Federal Register, December 3, 1979,
Vol. 44, No. 233, Part 3, pp. 69464-69575.
5. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. U.S. Department of
Health, Education and Welfare; Public Health Service,
Center for Disease Control, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Second Edition. Vols. 1, 2, 3; April 1977. Vol. 4,
August 1978. Vol. 5, August 1979. Vol. 6, August 1980.
6. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 26, Gaseous Fuels;
Coal and Coke; Atmospheric Analysis. American Society
for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
1980.
7. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 31, Water. American
Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, 1979.
8. Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis. 2nd ed., APHA
Intersociety Committee, 1977.
9. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-
Water. 14th ed., American Public Health Assn., Washington,
D.C., 1975.
10. Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and
Wastewater Laboratories. EPA-600/4-79-019, 1979.
F-114
-------
4.0 CHAIN OF CUSTODY
This section contains custody procedures used in the labora-
tory. Custody procedures used during sampling are contained in
the quality assurance plans for the field groups and the complete
procedure is compiled in a separate document.
4.1 SAMPLE RECEIVING
Every sample entering the lab for analysis is assigned a
unique alphanumeric identity on the Sample Receipt and Record
Sheet (Log). In the sample log-in book, the number is correlated
with the client's identification and with the number of the
analysis requisition form. A copy of the sample receipt and
record sheet is shown in Figure 4-1.
The analysis requisition is a triplicate form that lists the
client, project number, type and number of samples submitted, and
analyses required. It also assigns analysts to specific tasks
and shows the number of hours estimated for those tasks.
The white (top) sheet of the requisition form is placed in
the requisition binder; the pink sheet is placed with the samples
and later with the raw data. The yellow sheet is given to the
person requesting the analyses. In some cases, the yellow copy
may accompany some of the samples if a batch includes both inor-
ganic and organic analyses. A copy of the sample analysis
requisition and record sheet is shown as Figure 4-2.
The samples remain in the locked sample storage room until
removed for analysis. This transfer is documented on a Sample
Control Record (Figure 4-3) which is maintained by the sample
custodian. The Sample Control Record documents all custody
changes which occur in the laboratory and each procedure per-
formed on the sample.
4.2 SAMPLE ANALYSES
Prior to the analyst receiving the sample from the sample
custodian, a laboratory data sheet is prepared by the analyst.
F-115
-------
I
I-1
M
ftOCo eNV 1 RONMCNTAL LABORATORY
SAMPLE BlttlPT AND Ultimo blli:l:T
^•«it>l«<
MiMbcr
Rebuts i t ion
NiMiber
Cl ttrnt
Ndnc
Client's Sjmplt*
Tro n'crl
NumlM-i
OJK-
Rl'Cf 1 VIM|
Cunt J i ni*r
Humbct
U*lr
Repur ted
Month
Billed
D«t«
Discarded
t-«
Ol
-+
•0
•^
>
Figure 4-1. Example of Sample Receipt and Record Sheet.
-------
PEOCo ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUISITION AND RECORD SHEET N? 1252
Client:
Project no.:
Date results needed:
Type and number of samples:
.Date:.
.Requested by:.
Analyses Required
Ref. Method
Special Instructions:.
Retain samples until:.
.Budget:
Cost:
RESOURCES
Personnel
Man-hours
Est.
Act.
Date
done
Activity
Figure 4-2. Example of Sample Analysis
Requisition and Record Sheet.
F-117
-------
SAMPLE CONTROL RECORD
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NO.
REMOVED
BY
DATE fc TIME REMOVED
REASON
DATE t TIME
RETURNED
Figure 4-3. Example of Sample Control Record.
-------
The laboratory data sheet (Figure 4-4) includes the following
information:
0 Sample numbers
0 Date sample received by the analyst
0 Analysis and method number
0 Portion required for analysis
0 Signature of analyst
0 Signature of chemist checking calculations
Release of samples requires annotation of the Sample Control
Record and verification of information and sample container condi-
tion. If the sample is to be transferred between two persons
(i.e., two analysts), the transfer must take place through the
sample custodian. In other words, the sample must be returned to
the sample custodian and it is then reissued.
After obtaining the sample from the laboratory sample custo-
dian, the analyst verifies the data and makes appropriate annota-
tion of the records. If a question arises, it is first discussed
with the sample custodian. If this does not resolve the problem,
it is brought to the attention of the person submitting the
sample for analysis. If the problem cannot be resolved, the
sample is voided. The analyst keeps the samples in view or under
limited-access locked storage. The analyst visually inspects the
sample to determine that the physical condition is suitable for
analysis. For any sample for which the condition is questionable
or the method of collection was inappropriate, such as the pres-
ence of an inappropriate interference, the samples are not ana-
lyzed, and the data sheet is annotated. The analyst must maintain
proper custodial procedures while analyzing a sample. Samples or
intermediate solutions must be in the analyst's physical posses-
sion, in view, or in limited-access locked storage. The labora-
tories are locked so that only authorized personnel have access.
Analyses should be conducted in accordance with the proce-
dures specified in the contract statement of work and referenced
by number to the standard method in the laboratory procedures
manual. Any deviation from these procedures must be annotated,
and the analyst must be prepared to justify deviations under
oath. All data are recorded on the data sheet. All measurements
associated with the sample must be traceable in accordance with
good quality assurance record-keeping procedures. Thus, asso-
ciated calibrations must be recorded either directly on or
attached to the data sheet or indirectly by reference to the
standard solution number or instrument number.
All of the columns used on a data sheet must be labeled.
Extra columns may be used for intermediate results of calculations
if that will make for clearer understanding.
F-119
-------
lAJOMTO*'
CUtnt
Dttr
Analyst
Method
Checker
SAMPLE NUMBERS
Figure 4-4. Example of Laboratory Data Record,
F-120
-------
The axes of all graphs are labeled as follows: micrograms
and ppm are the x, or horizontal axes; O.D. and scale divisions
are the y, or vertical axes. If the least squares fit is cal-
culated, indicate this on the data sheet and record the slope,
y-intercept, and the correlation coefficient.
Sample calculations should be included so a reviewer at a
later date can ascertain immediately what was done.
4.3 SAMPLE RECORD KEEPING
The PEDCo alphanumeric identification is used on all data
sheets, containers, beakers, etc. The client's sample number or
name can be used for extra information, if desired. Exceptions
are instances in which a set of numbered containers, such as
Kjeldahl flasks or ashing crucibles, is used; here the container
number must be matched on the data sheet with the PEDCo alpha-
numeric identification.
All raw data for analyses in progress are kept in project
folders in a rack when not actually being used. When all the
tests on a set of samples are completed, all of the raw data
sheets with the pink requisition form attached are placed in the
appropriate Group Leader's "In" basket.
Associated calibration curves and charts should be signed
and dated; a system of positive identification and controlled
storage is used. The exact method of analysis must be readily
ascertainable. This is most easily done by making reference to
the standard analytical procedure used when a method allows for a
choice of procedures. If any portion of the sample remains after
analysis is completed and if storage is required, the analyst
must reseal the sample, and return it to the laboratory sample
custodian. Appropriate annotations are made in the transfer
records and the sample is stored in accordance with specified
procedures.
The analyst's calculations are checked as required by inter-
nal audit. The person checking the calculations signs and dates
the data sheet. The data sheet is returned to the file. All
records must be in ink. Errors are corrected by drawing a
straight line through the error and initialing. Completed rec-
ords are maintained by the laboratory sample custodian. Use of
records other than official records is prohibited.
When all analyses are completed, the report is prepared and
delivered. A copy of the report, the raw data, and other docu-
ments are placed in the laboratory files which are kept in a
locked, limited access area. The filing system utilizes a client
F-121
-------
or activity numbering system indicating the type of client or
activity, the specific client or activity, and dates of a specific
task. The system uses a number, set off by multiple decimal
points; e.g., 5.2.21, where the 5 indicates Quality Assurance/
Quality Control, the 2 indicates PAT analyses, and the 21 indi-
cates Round 46. The master log gives the client's identity and
the date of each file entry. This is the same client identifica-
tion number that is plotted on the individual QC charts for each
type of analysis.
ALL DEVIATIONS, DISCREPANCIES OR ERRORS, WHETHER NOTED
BY SAMPLING PERSONNEL, BY CUSTODIAN, BY ANALYST OR BY
CHECKER, MUST BE RECORDED.
F-122
-------
5.0 QUALITY CONTROL
Reliability in analytical determinations is maintained
through strict adherence to quality control procedures. PEDCo's
procedures are designed to control both the accuracy and pre-
cision of analytical results.
5.1 ACCURACY
When the analytical procedure is appropriate, a known refer-
ence standard is routinely analyzed to ensure the accuracy of
results. This standard may be spiked into a separate aliquot of
a sample or analyzed as a separate sample itself. The procedure
is to run this standard with each lot of samples sent to the
laboratory. In addition, if more than 10 individual analyses
are made, additional standards will be analyzed at the rate of 1
standard per 10 analyses.
Control charts are prepared using an estimate of the method
variability (i.e., standard deviation) obtained from the litera-
ture, or determined by repeated duplicate analyses run in the
laboratory. A control chart for accuracy is shown as Figure
5-1. Each time the analyst runs a reference standard, the
result is entered on the control chart. If the analytical
procedure is in control, the estimate of the standard should lie
within the +2o control limits. The results should be random,
and tend to fall above and below the true value for the standard.
If an individual analysis of the reference standard falls outside
the 2o limits, the analyst is required to repeat the analysis of
the standard. Should this second result also fall outside the
2o limits, the group leader determines the cause of the discrepancy
and makes the necessary corrections in procedure or technique.
The control chart also provides a means of detecting bias
in results. Evidence of bias is obvious when the individual
analyses of the reference standard tend to be all above (or
below) the true value, or begin to show a definite trend in the
amount of departure from the true value. When this situation
occurs, the sample custodian notifies the group leader and the
quality assurance coordinator even before the 2o limit is exceeded.
Again, routine sample analysis is not continued until the source
of bias has been identified and corrected.
F-123
-------
IinCRNAL STANDARD QC CHART . ACCURACY
fort ma
Throrruc*) Val
Act*
IB »o,
Figure 5-1. Accuracy control chart.
F-124
-------
5.2 PRECISION
Replicate analyses are performed on at least 10% of the
samples processed by the laboratory. A record of the precision
of most analyses is kept by calculating and plotting the coeffi-
cient of variation (CV) of the pairs. The coefficient of varia-
tion is defined by the equation:
o"U/2
CV = - =
X
where X and X
s
X
values of the given parameter for
the replicates,
the standard deviation of the rep-
licates, and
the mean of the replicates
The mean CV for an appropriate number of sample pairs
(usually 20) is determined, and the upper control_limit (UCL)
at the 99.5 percentile is calculated (UCL = 2.8 CV for duplicate
values). The mean and control limit values are plotted on the
chart shown as Figure 5-2.
The analysts report the results of replicate analyses each
day to the sample custodian on forms provided. The sample
custodian calculates and plots CV along with the date and client
code.
Quality Control data sheets for the organic group are shown
as Figures 5-3, 5-4, and 5-5, and for the inorganic group as
Figures 5-6 and 5-7.
5.3 CORRECTIVE MEASURES
When the sample custodian records a value that is out of
specification (for either accuracy or precision), the group
leader is immediately notified. A series of steps are then taken
to correct the deficiency:
0 The data are examined for calculation error.
0 The group leader discusses the test with the analyst to
see if a procedural error was made.
0 The reagents used are examined to see if any were out
of date or used in error.
0 The instrument, if one was used, is examined for
defects or improper calibration.
F-125
-------
N)
Oi
COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
p^B^MrtTR METHOD NUMBER UHIT<
MTt
VM.UC 1
VMlUt ?
cv
CLIENT 1
COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
Figure 5-2. Precision control chart.
-------
»TJ
M
to
Simple N
-------
M
00
Sample Not
Lab Standard to:
QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
B. DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
COV.POL'ND (including surrogate*)
P. P. *
COMPOUND NAME
CONCENTRATION (uR/l)
Aliquot 1 (D|)
Aliquot 2 (D2)
Coefficient
of variation
Tin QC Report also covers the following sample numbers:
Fiqure 5-4. Quality control report - duplicate analysis - orqanic,
-------
Additional Sample Calculation*:
Quality Control Calculations
Parameter
PRECISION
Sample No.
Values
Obtained
ACCURACY
Date
Theor.
Val.
Exp.
Val.
I of
Thesr.
Figure 5-5. Quality control report - charcoal tubes
F-129
-------
STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL REPORTING FORM
(INTERNAL STANDARD TOR ACCURACY)
Method No.
Working Range
Client
Values determined
Parameter
Unit»
PN
Date
Figure 5-6. Quality control report of accuracy - inorganic
REPLICATE
Method No.
Working Range
Client
Values determined
ANALYSIS REPORTING FORK
Parameter
Unite
PN Date
A B Difference
Figure 5-7. Quality control report of precision - inorganic,
F-130
-------
If the error is corrected by recalculation, no further
steps are taken. If the error was due to one of the other
causes, the test is rerun to obtain answers within specifications.
Should the results again be out of specifications, the above
procedures are followed in greater detail and the test rerun by
another analyst and/or with freshly prepared reagents.
5.4 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Audits)
The PEDCo Environmental Laboratory participates in the
Proficiency Analytical Testing Program administered by NIOSH; the
Water Pollution Performance Evaluation Program administered by
the U.S. EPA; and the U.S. EPA Stationary Source Quality Assurance
Program for S02» NOX, DGM, coal, and Method 3. The audit results
are reviewed by the Division Directors and the Quality Assurance
Coordinator and discussed with the Group Supervisors and the
analysts.
The PEDCo Laboratory also has been approved by the U.S. EPA
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory in Las Vegas,
Nevada for the analysis of priority pollutants from hazardous
waste sites. PEDCo has participated successfully in various
preaward performance surveys and ongoing performance audits under
existing contracts.
5.5 DATA VALIDATION
All data generated by the laboratory is checked for technical
accuracy by the Group Leaders. This involves verifying that the
appropriate analytical method was used, the detection limit is
appropriate, the proper number of significant figures are reported,
and the data were calculated properly (This is done by repeating
the calculations for at least one sample). The data is then
given to the Data Clerk who redoes all hand calculations and
verifies all data entries into computer programs. The data is
then reviewed by the Quality Assurance Coordinator before the
report is issued.
5.6 REPORTS
Analytical reports are typed by the Laboratory Clerk and
checked by the Data Clerk before being signed by the appropriate
supervisor. Major reports include summaries of all quality con-
trol data.
Twice weekly status reports of all laboratory projects (by
Analysis Requisition number) are prepared and submitted to the
Division Director. These reports include:
F-131
-------
0 date samples received
0 date analysis started
0 date report due
0 percent completed
0 appropriate remarks (problems and corrective actions)
These reports also include the status of all major instrumentation,
F-132
-------
6.0 TRAINING
It is corporate policy that each year each professional
employee is encouraged to attend one short course or its equivalent
specific to the employee's professional responsibilities.
Each new employee undergoes an orientation and on-the-job
training period before being assigned independent duties. When
reproducible results are routinely obtained by the analyst, he or
she is considered fully trained.
Additionally, institution of new techniques, modification of
procedures, or the acquisition of new equipment is accompanied by
appropriate in-house, or if necessary, extramural training.
Selected personnel are also trained in tasks different from
their regular assignments.
F-133
-------
7.0 INSTRUMENT MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION
PEDCo Environmental, Inc. maintains Preventive Maintenance
and Service Contracts with the manufacturers of all major instru-
ments in use in the laboratory (Finnigan Corporation, Hewlett-
Packard Company, Perkin-Elmer Corporation). Maintenance logs are
compiled for each major instrument.
7.1 INORGANIC SECTION
The following calibration procedures are followed:
0 Analytical balances are checked with class S weights
each day that they are used. If a trend in inaccuracy
is found, and cannot be corrected by PEDCo personnel,
professional service is obtained. The balances are
serviced and checked by an NBS certified service agent
each year.
0 Atomic absorption spectrophotometers are calibrated for
each metal analyzed and a record kept of instrument
response. Should a lack of sensitivity or other mal-
function be detected that cannot be corrected in-house,
professional service is obtained.
° Ultraviolet/visible spectrophotometers are checked with
standard color cuvettes each day they are used, and
checked for mirror and grating alignment monthly.
Service criteria are as described for the other in-
struments.
0 The bomb calorimeter is calibrated monthly as recom-
mended by the manufacturer.
7.2 ORGANIC SECTION
Gas chromatographs and the gas-chromatograph-mass spectrom-
eters are calibrated when used, for sensitivity, accuracy and
accurate mass assignment. If the required sensitivity cannot be
obtained, prescribed maintenance procedures are initiated. If
these do not enhance the instrument response to the level desired,
professional service is obtained.
F-134
-------
8.0 GLASSWARE CLEANING PROCEDURES
8.1 INORGANIC SECTION
Glassware is routinely cleaned with an alkaline detergent,
rinsed with hot tap water, and oven dried. Before use, each
item is rinsed with deionized water and/or the solution to be
used. Glassware to be used for trace metal analyses is cleaned
in either alcoholic sodium hydroxide or chromic acid, followed
by a soak in 1:1 nitric acid and a rinse with deionized water
(ASTM TYPE I).
8.2 ORGANIC SECTION
In the organic laboratory involved in the analysis of sam-
ples containing residues in the parts per billion range, the
preparation of scrupulously clean glassware is mandatory. Par-
ticular care must be taken with glassware such as Kuderna-Danish
flasks, evaporative concentrator tubes, or any other glassware
coming in contact with an extract that will be evaporated to a
lesser volume.
Basic cleaning steps are as follows:
0 Remove surface residuals immediately after use.
0 Hot soapy soak to loosen and flotate most of residue.
0 Hot water rinse to flush away flotated residue.
0 Soak with deep penetrant or oxidizing agent to destroy
traces of organic residue.
0 Hot water rinse to flush away materials loosened by
deep penetrant soak.
0 Rinse with distilled water to remove metallic deposits
from the tap water.
0 Rinse with high purity acetone followed by high purity
methylene chloride.
0 Bake in a muffle furnace at 400°C for 30 minutes.
0 Flush the glassware just before using with the same
solvent to be used in the analysis.
F-135
-------
9.0 SAFETY PROCEDURES
9.1 LABORATORY CONDUCT
0 Follow instructions exactly.
0 Perform only authorized experiments.
0 Protect eyes, face, hands and body.
0 Practice good housekeeping.
0 Learn basic first aid.
0 Know where to get help quickly.
0 Know location of first aid and fire fighting equipment.
0 Report all accidents and unusual occurrences immedi-
ately.
0 Be professional.
9.2 FIRE PREVENTION
0 Store all flammable liquids in the fireproof cabinets.
0 Whenever possible, and always when large quantities are
involved, use flammable liquids in a fume hood. When
it is necessary to use flammables on an open bench, be
certain that there are no open flames nearby.
0 Place waste flammable liquids in the appropriate
safety cans for disposal.
0 Dispose of solid and liquid oxidants, such as perox-
ides, perchlorates, and nitrates, by flushing down the
sink with water. Keep these materials away from flam-
mable items such as wood and paper.
0 Be certain not to overload electrical circuits. Do not
use equipment with worn or bare wiring.
F-136
-------
Be aware of the two types of fire extinguishers in the
laboratories. The dry chemical (ABC) type is for use
on paper, liquid, or electrical fires. The C02 (BC)
type is for use on liquid or electrical fires.
Know the location of the fire alarms on the hall wall
near the northeast exit stairwell and in the elevator
area.
9.3 PREVENTION OF POISONING
Use toxic materials such as chlorine gas, cyanides, and
bromine in a hood only. These are inhalation hazards,
and some are toxic by skin absorption. Use gloves when
handling bromine.
Some compounds in use in the lab are slow-acting
poisons when ingested or absorbed in small amounts.
Among these are arsenic, mercury, lead, and hexavalent
chromium compounds. Wear gloves when handling these
compounds in high concentrations and wash hands thor-
oughly after use.
Clean up all chemical spills, even of seemingly harm-
less materials. One spill may react with another.
Neutralize concentrated acids with sodium carbonate
(Na2C03), and bases with boric acid (H3B04) before
cleaning up.
Always use a rubber bulb to pipet.
Exercise care in handling of all samples. Their
contents are unknown.
Do not eat, drink, or smoke in the lab work areas.
If you have any questions about handling a particular
compound or reaction, consult your supervisor, the wall
chart, or the CRC Handbook of Laboratory Safety.
9.4 PERSONAL SAFETY
0 Clean up all water spills on the floor.
0 Use only equipment and tools suited to the job at hand.
0 Dispose of broken glass only in the marked container.
F-137
-------
Do not wear loose clothing or open-top shoes. Wear a
laboratory coat at all times and a rubber apron, gog-
gles, or gloves when indicated.
9.5 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
Know how to use the following items in the laboratory:
fire extinguishers, fire blankets, safety showers, eye
wash stations, first aid kits and the rescue air pack.
9.6 GENERAL
Protective Clothing - Each employee will be provided a
sufficient number of laboratory garments (i.e., lab
coats, smocks, etc.) to be worn at all times while in
the laboratory. Care of these garments by the laundry
service company is the responsibility of the employee.
Each employee should have one clean garment available
at all times.
Eye Protection - Safety glasses are required under
Federal law and must be utilized. Custom-fit safety
glasses or corrective lenses are furnished by PEDCo.
Foot Protection - Conventional street-type footwear is
sufficient. Sandals, canvas, or similar footwear
should not be worn in the laboratory.
Miscellaneous - Rubber, cloth, or leather gloves are
available for hand protection and must be worn whenever
the occasion warrants.
Exits - Be conscious at all times of the nearest lab-
oratory exit and nearest building exit.
F-138
-------
APPENDIX G
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
G-l
-------
TABLE G-l. PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Name
Title
Field test assignment
C. Bruffey
D. Osterhout
D. Scheffel
R. Antesberger
P. Clarke
G. Meiners
D. Fitzgerald
M. Phillips
Mr. Melvin Belich
Mr. Robert Budd
Mr. John Burckle
Mr. Al Vervart
Mr. James Nolan
Project Manager
Engineer
Technician
Technician
Engineer
Technician
Technician
Engineer
ASARCO
ASARCO
U.S. EPA - IERL
U.S. EPA - OAQPS
PSAPCA
Coordinate test activity, process
monitoring, liaison with plant
and EPA personnel
Site leader; filterable particu-
late/arsenic and particle size
tests at air curtain hooding
system test site; meter reader
particle size trains
Filterable particulate/arsenic
tests; meter reader
Assist at sample site with par-
ticle size and filterable par-
ticulate/arsenic tests
S02 continuous monitor operator;
obtain manual and perform titra-
tions for S02 analysis
Perform tracer study tests, SFg
injections, and GC analysis
Assist with tracer study, per-
form SF, injections
Setup and recovery of filterable
particulate/arsenic and particle
size sampling trains, assist with
particle size tests
Coordinate test activity relative
to process operation
Coordinate test activity relative
to process operation
Observer
Observer
Observer
G-2
-------
APPENDIX H
VISUAL OBSERVATION LOGS
H-l
-------
LOG KEPT BY
ALFRED VERVAERT
EMISSION STANDARDS AND ENGINEERING DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711
PHONE: (919) 541-5601
H-2
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 18, 1983
0802 Started on finish blow; two ladles of cold dope were added at
about 0815; observer was not present to view; Jim Nolan observed
additions; capture <50%; Burckle says limit switch was not acti-
vited; switch reactivated manually
0845 No. 4 on Cu blow; no visible emission from 1° hood; no visible
emission from 2° hood; observer location directly across aisle
from No. 4 converter; eye level with upper part of 1°; lighting
conditions generally poor; no light above No. 4 converter, heavy
overcast; light background visible emission due to balloon flue
leakage. Observer: Alfred E. Vervart
0851 Started punching, no visible emission out of 1° hood
0900 No visible emission from 1° or 2° hoods; finish blow continues
0916 1° roll out; heavy visible emission for 15 seconds during roll
out; 75% effective; 100% capture while awaiting crane; moderate
visible emission from mouth
0910 No. 4 partially rolled out; awaiting ladle
0911 Cu pour slow; moderate to heavy visible emission; little or no
spillage or penetration; capture 95%
0914 End Cu pour; No. 4 still partially rolled out; low to moderate
visible emission; capture 100%
0915 Cu pour (1 minute in duration); moderate visible emission; slight
spillage out of front of 2° hood; capture 95% or better; little
or no penetration
0916 No. 4 still partially rolled out; light emission; capture >98%
0921 Small ladle of blister Cu charged to No. 4; moderate to heavy
visible emission; capture >95%
Note: Blister returned, not blown enough; will resume Cu blow
(continued)
H-3
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
0923 No. 4 rolled in partially - on idle; plugged instrument line at
S02 plant, should take 25-30 minutes to fix and go back on line.
0950 No. 4 on hold, should resume at 1100 a.m. when instrument lines
are repaired; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1000 Stopped observing
1025 Returned to observation site; No. 4 still on hold; no visible
emission from 1° or 2° hood
1045 1° hood raised; No. 4 rolled in/l° hood lowered and blowing
commenced; light visible emission; capture 100%
1100 Cu blow continues; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1109 Cu pour - visible emission heavy for about 12 seconds during
initial roll out; 30% OP, escaping capture; capture 70%; moderate
visible emission during actual skim; no visible emission seen
spilling out front or penetrating air curtain; capture >95%
1113 Cu pour completed; No. 4 continues to be rolled out awaiting
crane and ladle
1115 Cu pour, moderate to heavy fume; no spillage observed; perhaps
slight penetration; very light <10% OP; capture >95%
1116 End Cu pour; No. 4 awaiting ladles; 100% capture of visible
emission from 1° hood mouth
1122 Cu pour (30 seconds in duration); slight spillage, 10% OP out
front for about 5 seconds; felt strong breeze; capture >95%
overall; 100% capture after pour while awaiting ladle
1130 Cu pour (30 seconds duration); moderate to heavy emission;
spillage out front of hood (upper right, 20% OP); felt wind
currents through aisle; overall effectiveness, 90%
1131 Cu pour (30 seconds); heavy fume; spillage out of front right
side; 30% OP; quantity judged to be moderate amount; worst pour
observed by far; appear to be wind currents running from left to
right; overall effectiveness, 80%; some penetration through air
jet but light
(continued)
H-4
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1137 Cu pour (40 seconds in duration); moderate to heavy fume; spill-
age out right front for 15 seconds; capture 80%; appears that
greater rotation of converter due to lowering of Cu content
creates a horizontal thermal effect which pushes fume out
1142 Cu pour (10 seconds); spillage seen out front; maximum 30% OP; no
penetration of air jet; capture 80-90%
Emissions following pour are light; capture 100%
1146 Cu pour (1 minute); fume moderate; little or no spillage or
penetration; pour appeared to be better controlled (i.e., poured
more slowly); may have effect on emissions; capture >95%
Awaiting ladle; little or no visible emission from No. 4 mouth;
ASARCO informed me that that was end of cycle (at 1150); No. 4
now on idle
1200 Cu pour (10 seconds); fume light to moderate; no front spillage
or penetration evident; capture 100%
1204 Ladle brought in place; Cu pour (1 minute); visible emission
light to moderate; little or no spillage or penetration observed;
if so, only slight; capture >95%
1210 Cu pour, final; visible emission light to moderate; no spillage
or penetration observed
1235 Notified that matte ladles would be charged; one was charged
while we were not present, communication breakdown; PEDCo started
testing on time, however
1237 Matte charge No. 2 (5 minutes); fume heavy to very heavy; slight
penetration of air jet; however, emissions seem to be swept back
in; capture >95%; fire in No. 4 heavy; crane operator swinging
ladle to open mouth and charge skulls; fume from ladle while
swinging discharged out front; hold fire in No. 4; very light
visible emission; capture 100%
1240 No. 3 matte charge (30 seconds); fume heavy to very heavy; cap-
ture >95%; some penetration, but slight; somewhat higher penetra-
tion when ladle is removed; essentially complete capture while on
hold fire
(continued)
H-5
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1243 Cu slag charge, material is very flammable and fumes severely;
extremely heavy fume and fire; capture >90%; however, substantial
quantity of fume penetrating air jet
System appears to be overwhelmed by both amount of fume and high
temperatures (deviation 15 minutes); opacity of escaping fume,
40-50%; severe leakage was sighted behind the 2° hood, source
unknown; also leakage out of silica charge chute; end at 1258
1300 No. 4 matte charge (10 seconds); some penetration; too fast to
assess capture effectiveness; check Nolan's log
1305 Anode slag; again fire in converter very heavy; fume extremely
heavy; some penetration; 90% capture at worst; >95% at best;
opacity of escaping emissions 10-20%; very small quantity com-
pared to volume of fume generated; time 3 minutes; some pene-
tration when ladle retracted, 10 ft plume at 30% OP for 5
seconds; hood performance pretty outstanding considering duty
1311 Moderate to light 1° hood leakage; slight penetration; <5% OP;
capture 90%
1313 No. 5 matte charge (15 seconds); fume very heavy; some penetra-
tion for 5 seconds; 30% OP close to top of hood; appears most is
swept back in, however; capture >95%; 1° continued to leak mod-
erately; slight penetration <10% OP; capture 95%
1325 Light fume from hold fire; slight penetration due to turbulence;
capture >95%
1327 No. 6 matte charge (30 seconds); very heavy fume; slight losses
through air jet; <20% OP; capture >95%; fume continues to leak
out of 1° hood during hold fire; slight losses; capture >95%
Note: Lighting conditions have improved; sun is coming out
1335 Leakage at mid-point of 1° hood continues; 2° hood gets nearly
100% of 1° hood leak; wisps escaping
1340 No. 7 matte charge (30 seconds); heavy fume; slight wisps es-
caping through top; >95% capture; truly remarkable considering
thermal draft and mechanical forces at play
1344 1° hood raised heavy fire; ladle of Cu slag added (1 minute
duration); fume extremely heavy; some penetrating air jet; system
gets overwhelmed with time (cannot clear all fume generated in
time); capture 95%
(continued)
H-6
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1558 Skim No. 3 (duration 60 seconds); heavy spillage out front; looks
like fume is affected by wind currents; spillage from both sides
but right side predominant; >30%OP; capture <60%
Note: Ladle location okay
No. 4 remains rolled out; light fuming from mouth; capture 100%;
no visible emission escaping
1546 Matte charge (10 seconds); heavy fume; 95% capture; slight wisps
penetrating air jet; especially when lade is retracted
No. 4 awaiting additional charge
Note: No. 4 will be held overnight; expansion joint leak at acid
or S02 plant causing curtailment
1617 Matte charge (10 seconds); visible emission penetrating air jet;
20% OP and for about 1-2 seconds; capture >90%; No. 4 fuming from
mouth while awaiting charge; capture 100%; slight wisps escaping;
aisle seems windy
1620 Matte charge; fume heavy; spillage from front and penetration for
3 seconds; 20-30% OP; capture >80%; feels windy
1622 No. 4 rolled in/on hold; blowing will resume in a.m.
H-7
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 19, 1983
Slag blowing on No. 4 will resume at 0730
0722 No. 4 on hold; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hoods; no visi-
ble emission from converter mouth
Observer location directly across asile from No. 4 converter;
lighting conditions poor; sky is overcast and predawn
0725 1° hood raised; ladle of shell slag charged (duration li min-
utes); light to moderate fume or dust; no spillage or penetration
observed; capture 100%; No. 4 back on idle
0729 No. 4 rolled in and slag blowing commenced; little or no visible
emission observed
0732 1° hood leakage; light; capture 100%; reset watch
Silica charging started at 0732
0734 Stopped silica charging
0740 Tuyere punching started; no visible emission; punching stopped at
0741.5
0745 No. 4 on slag blow; no visible emission sighted
0756 Tuyere punching; no visible emission
0800 No visible emission sighted during previous 15 minutes
0804 Tuyere punching; no visible emission
0807 Skag skim (2i minutes); very heavy fume during roll out; capture
<50%; 2° hood system overwhelmed for 5-10 seconds; heavy penetra-
tion; 40-50% OP; during actual skim spillage out front, but rela-
tively light; penetration moderate to heavy; it appears that
thermal currents, etc., create too much turbulence; capture <70%;
No. 4 awaiting ladle for additional skimming; visible emission
from mouth; capture 100%
(continued)
H-8
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
0815 Slag skim (2i minutes); best skim viewed thus far; fume generated
was moderate to heavy; some spillage out front of hood; 20% OP;
spillage light, however
Note: It appears that some of the spillage is recaptured by the
hood
Penetration through air jet light; capture effectiveness ranged
from 85-90%
0823 Slag skim (3 minutes); slag poured out slowly; spillage out front
generally light; some penetration on occasion, but light; capture
ranged from <80-90%
Note: Rate of pouring seems to have a significant affect on gas
volume and fume generated
No. 4 back on hold; 1° hood partially up; light visible emission
from mouth; capture 100%
0830 Matte charge (30 seconds); heavy fume; little on no penetration;
capture >95%
0834 Matte charge (30 seconds); again, little or no penetration; only
slight wisps; capture >95%; OP of wisps <20%
0836 Shell slag ladle (30 seconds); fume ranged from moderate to
extremely heavy; system overwhelmed for brief period of about 5
seconds; moderate penetration at 30% OP; light to moderate spill-
age at right front for about 2 seconds (20% OP); capture effec-
tiveness 85-95%; overall 90%
0840 Shell slag ladle (1 minute); fuming was light; capture 100%
0842 No. 4 rolled in, resumed slag blow; visible emission during roll
in moderate to heavy; capture >95%
0854 Very light fume leaking from 1°; capture 100%; duration 5 seconds
0856 Slight puffing from 1°; no visible emission from 2° hood
0902 Blowing/tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
0905 Condition unchanged; tuyere punching discontinued
(continued)
H-9
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
0910 Condition unchanged; tuyere punching repeated
0912 No. 4 roll out, slag skim; poured slag rapidly (1 minute); fume
heavy to very heavy; spillage out front, 20-30% OP; penetration
about the same; substantial turbulence within confines of the 2°
hood; system overwhelmed; appears to be dead spot across front of
hood; visible emission observed escaping capture during entire
slag skim; No. 4 remained rolled out; light fuming from mouth;
capture 100%
Note: Fume always moves from left to right; cause unknown
0922 Slag skim (3i minutes in duration); pouring rate moderate; fuming
moderate to heavy; spillage front right front continues; also
penetration of air jet; penetration light except for 5 seconds;
fume rolling back into front is evident again; 20-30% OP; end
skim at 0926
Capture ranged from <80-90% as skimming proceeded; pouring rate
appears to affect emissions; No. 4 awaiting ladle
0932 Matte charge (15 seconds duration); slight penetration; capture
95%; penetration consisted of light wisps; 1° hood completely
retracted; fuming from converter mouth light; no visible emission
from 2° hood; capture 100%
0936 Shell slag charge (15 seconds); initially fume extremely heavy
and dusty; system overwhelmed for 2-5 seconds; thermal rise of
fume very fast; penetration heavy; 60% OP; capture range 40-95%;
overall - 85%
0939 Matte charge (18 seconds); capture >95%; light wisps at top
0940 Roll in and commence slag blow
Note: 1° hood has very good draft; little or no visible emission
from 1° hood during roll in
0945 Light visible emission from 1°; no visible emission from 2
1005 No visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
(continued)
o
H-10
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1007 Slag skim (3 minutes); No. 4 rolled out quickly; blowing air
still on; very heavy fuming overwhelmed air jet; capture <50%;
By end of skim, capture improved to 80%; penetration and spillage
from upper right front continued over entire skim; skimming rate
was very fast
At end of skim, No. 4 rolled in and blowing air activated; devia-
tion 2 seconds; capture 90%
o
1015 Skimming ladle returned; no visible emission from 1° or 2
1020 Slag skim; control over initial roll out was poor again; capture
over roll out <50%; heavy visible emission above 2° hood; 30-40%
OP; fume during actual skim, heavy; pouring rate slow to moder-
ate; fume escaping out front on right side; 20-30% OP of fume;
some penetration through top, especially top front
Condition fairly constant throughout skim
Duration of skim - 7 minutes
No. 4 will be on standby for 2 hours
1127- Two cold additions (scrap)
1135
1143 Begin finish blow
1200 Blowing; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1228 Roll out of converter for scrap charge; observed medium to light
emission ~20% OP for 30 seconds leaving hood about 15% escaping
Scrap charge 1229; heavy emission, 90% OP within hood; emission
generated for about 30 seconds; opacity of about 60-70%; esti-
mated capture eff. for this period was 70-80%; penetration quickly
ceased and cap. eff. "90-95% observed
Ladle No. 2 charged at 1235; heavy emissions within hood for
15-20 seconds; approximately 15-20% escaping through ac slot
during this time; opacity of escaping fume 50-60% (i.e., lighter
or less dense than first ladle); a.c. quickly cleared at top and
penetration ceased; Remainder of fume cleared quickly and effec-
tively; hood closed at ~1238; return to blowing; no visible
emission within 1° or 2° hood
Two preceeding charges were observed under improved lighting
conditions; sun is out
(continued)
H-n
-------
Log Book No. 1 . No. 4 Converter
1245 No visible emission observed from either 1° or 2° hood since roll
in
1300 No visible emission observed from 1° or 2° hood since 1245
1312 No. 4 roll out (5 seconds); moderate to heavy fume for 5 seconds
during roll out period; fume penetrated air jet; moderate at 30%
OP; 2° hood capture improved immediately after blowing air was
shut off
1315 Converter mouth fuming; 100% capture
1316 Scrap charge (1 minute); fume heavy to very heavy; some penetra-
tion but light, 20% OP; capture >90%
1317 Scrap charge; large piece of scrap dropped into bath; very heavy
fume; light penetration; capture >90%
1319 No. 4 rolled in and continued blowing; some penetration during
roll in when blast air activated; capture >90%
1330 No visible emission from 1° or 2° hood since roll in
1345 No visible emission from 1° or 2° hood since 1330
1356 Light fume from primary hood leak; capture 100%
1358 Moderate fuming from 1° hood; capture 100%; cause unknown
Took a break; returned at 1415; scrap charge took place prior to
return; Jim Nolan observed; No. 4 still on Cu blow; no visible
emission from 1° or 2°
Note: Stopped sampling at 1400; end of previous Cu blow if this
Cu blow considered representative
H-12
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 20, 1983
0704 No. 4 has hold fire; met conditions are not favorabe for smelt-
ing; lighting in aisle is poor, predawn; observer location
directly across No. 4 converter
0822 Matte charge (45 seconds); fuming from No. 4 extremely heavy,
prior to actual charge; cause unknown; heavy visible emission
above 2° hood; capture <50%; during the actual charge, emissions
continued to penetrate the air jet; capture during actual charge
90%
Hold fire on No. 4; generating moderate emissions; capture 100%
Note: Jim Nolan said that matte was actually being poured into
No. 4 when heavy fuming started
0833 Hold fire continues to generate moderate fuming; capture 100%; no
visible emission observed escaping 2° hood
Note: Lighting conditions improving; sky is overcast, therefore,
no direct sunlight
0840 Matte charge 1 (20 seconds); fuming moderate to heavy; light
visible emission (15% OP) seen penetrating the air jet; fuming
within the 2° hood appears more turbulent than usual; capture
>90%
Fuming from hold fire continues; slight wisps of fume may be
escaping through the air jet; 1° hood was partially lowered;
reduced hold fire fuming substantially (75%)
0854 Matte charge 2 (20 seconds); fuming moderate to heavy; light
wisps appear to be escaping through air jet; capture 95%
0909 Matte charge 3 (25 seconds); fuming moderate to heavy; visible
emission seen above air jet for 5 seconds at heaviest point in
fuming; >20% OP; again, conditions within the 2° hood seem more
turbulent than previously observed; capture >90%; range 85-95%
0915 Fuming from hold fire continues; capture >95%; a barely percepti-
ble quantity of fume seems to be escaping due to turbulence above
the air jet
(continued)
H-13
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
0926 Matte charge 4 (25 seconds); fuming moderate to heavy; overall
capture >90%; large puffs of fume penetrated air jet at right
rear of the hood; opacity of puff 30%; additional fume penetrated
the air jet when the ladle was withdrawn
0930 Hold fire fuming moderately; light wisps appear to be escaping;
capture 95%
0939 Moved closer to No. 4 converter; light fuming out of 2° hood
definitely observed
0944 Matte charge 5 (25 seconds); fuming moderate to heavy; again,
puff of fume penetrated jet at right rear; believe this is due to
unused block and hook blocking air jet; capture 95%
0947 Ladle of slage shells; fume heavy to very heavy; substantial
penetration at rear right again; large emission, 40% OP; overall
capture nevertheless was 95%; some spillage out the front upon
withdrawing the ladle
0952 Ladle of slag shells (28 seconds); event identical to 0947 charge
of slag shells; fume escaping may have been denser (60% OP); took
several minutes for air jet to catch up with escaping fume and
achieve >95% capture
0958 Hold fire reduced substantially; little or no fume evident; matte
charge 6 (18 seconds); fume heavy to very heavy; capture 95%
overall; however, large puffs at rear right occurred again
1000 Commenced blowing; heavy fuming from primary hoods for about 2
minutes; capture 95%; some losses evident above air jet
1005 Moderate to heavy 1° hood leakage is continuing; 2° hood capture
95%; some losses out of top; fume appears to roll back over air
jet
1008 Silica addition; heavy leakage out of 1° hood; capture 95%
1009 Substantial fuming behind the 2° hood; source is unknown
1011 1° hood leakage continuing; fume very dense, 80%; capture >95%;
fume behind hoods less substantial
1014 Silica charging stopped; 1° hood leakage abating
1015 Heavy leakage reappeared for about 5 seconds
(continued)
H-14
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1016 Heavy leakage reappeared for abuot 30 seconds; capture >95%
1018 Heavy 1° hood leakage continues to occur for 30 seconds every
minute; capture 95%; cause of leakage unknown; may be problem
with 1° draft or too high blowing rate
1023 1° hood leakage appears to be predictable; 15 seconds, no leaks;
then heavy leakage for 40 seconds; (basis: stopwatch timing of
event); capture >95%
1031 Cycle of 15 seconds, no 1° leakage followed by 40 seconds 1°
leakge is continuing; 2° hood capture >95%; light wisps escaping
from top
1035 1° hood leakage appears to be stopped; no visible emission from
1° or 2°
1044 Extremely heavy leakage from all parts of 1° hood and converter;
capture effectiveness of 2°, >95%; rolled out No. 4 at 1045 and
proceeded with a small skim; visible emission seen at top of hood
and spilling out front; capture >80%
1049 Slag skim continued; this time ladle held up by crane nearer to
mouth; pouring rate was moderate; fume moderate to heavy; spill-
age out of front during most of skim (20% OP); light penetration
at air jet; capture 90%; duration skim 3 minutes
1054 Slag skim (2 minutes); initial skimming resulted in moderate
plume escaping unit front for 5-10 seconds; opacity of plume 30%;
pouring rate was relatively fast; spillage out front continued
for most of skim; capture 70-80%; overall 80%
1059 Slag skim (2 minutes); visible emission observed spilling out
front and some penetration of air jet; opacity 20%; ladle was
only partially filled; overall capture 85%; range 80-90%
1110 Matte charge 6 (15 seconds); fume moderate to heavy, brief
puffing at right rear at end of charge; capture >95%
Note: Spare block on crane was raised
1111 Matte charge 7 (18 seconds); fume moderate to heavy; capture >95%
1114 Matte charge 8 (20 seconds); fume heavy; little or none escaping;
capture >95/c
1117 Slag shells (20 seconds); fume moderate; capture 100%
(continued)
H-15
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1118 Slag shells (20 seconds); fume moderate; capture 100%
1119 Roll in of No. 4; very heavy to extremely heavy fume; no spill-
age, some air jet penetration; capture during roll in >95%
1120 1° hood down; heavy leakage; turbulence and some penetration of
air jet at top; capture >95%; heavy background visible emission
Heavy visible emission from silica feed chute; 1° hood leakage
continuing to be very bad; fume turning yellow; system completely
overwhelmed; 100% OP everywhere
1125 Rolled out No. 4; placed on hold; obviously there is a problem at
the acid and S02 plants; no 1° hood draft
1129 Rolled No. 4 in; 100% OP cloud overwhelmed the system; rolled out
No. 4 immediately; this is an upset condition
1214 Attempted to roll in No. 4; damper problem still evident; tremen-
dous quantity of fume generated when No. 4 returned to blowing
status; rolled No. 4 back out at 1215
No. 4 converter rolled in on slag blow at 1350
1400 No visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1405 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1413 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1417 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1424 Slag skim (less than 2 minutes); visible emission heavy during
roll out; slag flow is very fast; spillage from front (right
side) substantial; also, some penetration of air jet; overall
capture 70%
1430 No. 4 on idle awaiting slag ladle; no visible emission from mouth
on 2° hood
1433 Slag skim (li minutes); skimming rate very fast; visible emission
seen at front and above 2° hood; fuming moderate to heavy; cap-
ture effectiveness 70%; opacity of escaping emission 20-30%;
visible emission at front moving from left to right; turbulence
within hood very substantial
(continued)
H-16
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1439 Slag skim (2 minutes 45 seconds); skimming rate fast; fuming
heavy/turbulent; fume escaping from right side of 2° hood; opac-
ity 10-20%; some penetration, difficult to judge opacity; capture
ranged from 70-80%
Note: 1° hood all the way up
1449 Matte charge 9 (30 seconds); fuming is heavy; some spillage due
to swinging of ladle to break skull; duration of spillage 5
seconds; capture effectiveness 90-95%; little or no penetration
observed
1452 Matte charge 10 (25 seconds); fuming was heavy; no spillage
observed during actual charging; slight wisps at top of air jet;
capture 95%
1454 Slag shells (18 seconds); very heavy fume; some penetration for
about 3 seconds; opacity 30-40%; capture effectiveness >95%
1457 Shell slag (25 seconds); fuming light to moderate; no escaping
emission observed; capture >95%
1500 No. 4 rolled in; slag blowing resumed; fume heavy; some escaping
on two occasions from upper middle of opening; similar to being
wind blown; opacity 20%; capture 95%
1505 Silica addition; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1510 Silica addition completed; no visible emission observed at any
time
1515 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
1525 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
1530 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
1537 Slag skim (50 seconds); extremely heavy fuming; operator did not
cut back on blast air until skimming began; fume overwhelmed 2°
hood; capture effectiveness undetermined; skim pouring rate very
fast; fume heavy; fume spilling out from front of hood (right
side); capture estimated at 70%
No. 4 awaiting slag ladle; fume light; capture 100%
1545 Slag skim (54 seconds); fume heavy; pouring rate very fast;
losses out front substantial, 30-40% OP; capture 70%
(continued)
H-17
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1554 Matte charge 11 (20 seconds); fume heavy; light penetration
through air jet; no spillage from front; capture >95%
1608 Matte charge 12 (15 seconds); fume heavy; light wisps escaping
through air jet; no spillage out front; capture >95%
1615 Roll in No. 4; capture 100%
1655 Slag skim; air curtain damper setting backed off to 0% (closed)
to determine if air jet actually exacerbates control problem;
fume moderate to heavy; spillage out front less than usual, 20%
OP; some penetration but not much; fume moves from right to left
and into exhaust hood; capture judged to be 80-90%
1703 Slag skim with air curtain damper closed; skim rate is fast; fume
heavy; fume moving up right side of hood; spillage 20-30% OP;
penetration difficult to determine because of darkness above 2°
hood; turbulence inside of hood reduced but increase in capture
effectiveness unknown; capture 80%
Note: Next skim will have air curtain activated
1732 Rolled No. 4 back in; slag blow moderate fume, 100% capture
1735 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
1756 Roll out for slag skimming; skimming rate moderate (3i minutes);
very heavy fume or roll out; overwhelmed 2° hood; heavy fume on
skimming; large quantity of spillage out the front; fume going
out to middle of aisle; penetration undetermined due to fume in
front of hood; capture ranged from 40-70%
1808 Added a large piece of scrap (blister); heavy fume generated;
light penetration of air jet; 95% capture overall
1810 Added another piece of blister to cool bath; fuming moderate;
capture >95%
1812 Third piece of blister added; fume moderate; light wisp escape;
capture >95%
1814 Fourth piece of blister added; fume light; capture 100%
(continued)
H-18
-------
Log Book No. 1 . No. 4 Converter
1815 Rolled in No. 4 to start finish blow (duration 5 seconds); heavy
fume; fume at 20-30% OP; penetrated the air jet for about 2
seconds; capture 90%
Note: Did not observe from 1830 to 1900
Returned at station at 1900; No. 4 on hold; no visible emission
from 1° or 2° hood
Copper blow restarted at 1921
1945 No. 4 still on copper blow; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
hood
1959 No. 4 rolled out; light visible emission seen over top of hood
for 10 seconds; fume moderate; capture effectiveness 90% during
roll out; No. 4 in hold mode due to SCS
H-19
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 21, 1983
No testing was conducted on the 21st due to weather
(curtailment)
H-20
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 22, 1983
0827 No. 4 on hold; 1° hood partially down; no visible emission from
1° or 2°
Note: Will attempt to sample only slag skims when No. 4 is
rolled out for TSP, AS, and particle size
Status: No. 4 on third slag blow
0905 Lighing, overcast sky; 1° hood raised; hold fire off; No. 4 on
idle
0907 Slag shell addition (20 seconds); heavy fume; spillage out front
(upper right) for about 2 seconds; 30% OP; penetration at air
jet, 30% OP; duration, 5 seconds; capture effectiveness, range
90-95%; overall 95%; fume opacity, 40-60-100%
0911 Slag shell addition (40 seconds); fume light to moderate (black);
no spillage or penetration; capture 100%
0913 Rolled No. 4 in and commenced slag blow; fume moderate; some
penetration of air jet; duration 10-15 seconds; capture effec-
tiveness 90%
Note: Relatively heavy fugitives from right side of converter;
source unknown; background fugitives fairly high (smokey or hazy
in aisle); source of fugitives appears to be right rear of No. 4
converter; fugitives moving from left to right in front of No. 4
0920 Tuyere punching; no perceptible visible emission from 1° to 2°;
fugitives from side of No. 4 continuing
0930 No visible emission from 1° or 2° hood; fugitives continuing but
abating somewhat
0937 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
0940 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
0945 No visible emission from 1° or 2°; fugitives from right side of
No. 4 have lightened up substantially; draft through aisle now
from left to right
(continued)
H-21
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
0952 No. 4 rolled out; fume very heavy for 5 seconds until tuyeres out
of bath; fume penetrated air curtain; 40-60% OP; capture 60-70%
0955 No. 4 idling; light visible emission from mouth; capture 100%
0959 Slag skim (45 seconds); skimming rate fast; fume moderate to
heavy; no spillage; light penetration at right rear of slot;
capture 95%; best skim thus far
Note: Ladle held by crane very close to No. 4
1002 Slag skim (1:45 minutes); skimming rate moderate; fume moderate
to heavy; no spillage; continuous light penetration at right rear
of air jet; 20% OP; capture 95%
Note: Fume pattern different than previous day; fume rising
straight up rather than impinging on right wall as previously;
Major reason for better capture; capture 95%
1012 Slag skim (partial pot 45 seconds); skimming rate moderate; fume
moderate to heavy; spillage out at left front of hood; fume
rising and impinging in left wall; 20% OP; capture 90%
Note: Placement of ladle close to under converter seems to help
reduce emissions; also, it appears that air currents in the aisle
may be important
Note: 1020 sunshine; No. 4 idling, no visible emission from 1°
or 2°
1030 No. 4 on idle; no visible emission from 1° or 2°; maintenance
crew out apparently repairing source of fugitives from right rear
of No. 4
1048 Matte charge (20 seconds); fume heavy; spillage out front of
hood, none; penetration,light; 20% OP; capturre 95%
1047 Matte charge (20 seconds); fume moderate to heavy; spillage,
none; penetration light; 20% OP; capture 95%
Note: Matte charges fume heavily when retracted; also, retracting
ladle results in turbulence; ladle draws fume out from hood
1051 Ladle on slag shells (10 seconds); fume light; spillage, none;
penetration light upper right rear; capture >95%
Note: Reverts ladle appears smaller and can almost be placed in
mouth of converter
(continued)
H-22
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1055 Ladle of slag shells (20 seconds); fume light; no spillage or
penetration; capture 100%
Note: Much of fume and dust goes into 1° hood
1057 Rolled No. 5 back in for slag blow; fume light to moderate; no
spillage or penetration; capture 100%
1138 No. 4 rolled out (10 seconds); fume heavy to very heavy; spillage
some at right front; 20% OP; penetration fairly heavy; 40-60% OP;
capture 70%
1139 Slag skim; started skimming with ladle on floor; very heavy fume
impinging on right wall; spillage and penetration of air jet;
capture 70-80%; stopped skimming; restarted with ladle raised by
crane; marked difference in both the quantity of fume generated
and capture effectiveness; fume heavy; spillage light at right
front (OP <20%); penetration light to moderate (20% OP); capture
effectiveness 70-90%
1147 Slag skim (2 minutes 43 seconds); ladle raised; skim rate moder-
ate; fume moderate to heavy; spillage, yes; some fume rises out-
side of hood; fume impinging on right wall; <20% OP; penetration
very slight, <20% OP; capture ranged from 80-95%; overall 90%
1149 Slag skim (3 minutes 53 seconds); skim rate moderate; fume moder-
ate to heavy; penetration, none observed; spillage intermittent
for about 1 minute in duration out of right side; 10-20-30% OP;
capture ranged from 80-95%; overall 90%
Note: Draft in aisle has increased
1206 Matte charge (20 seconds); fume moderate to heavy; no spillage or
penetration observed; capture 100%
1209 Matte charge (15 seconds); fume moderate to heavy; spillage,
none; penetration, wisps; capture >95%
Note: It takes 1 minute for ladle to essentially stop fuming
after being withdrawn from hood
1210 No. 4 on hold; curtailment
1600 No. 4 put on slag blow
1605 Silica addition; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
(continued)
H-23
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1622 Slag skim (2 minutes); pouring rate fast; ladle on aisle floor;
fume heavy and impinging on left wall; spillage light, 20% OP;
penetration moderate throughout skim, 20% OP; capture 80%
Note: Operator did not let bath cool before pouring and ladle on
ground
1628 No. 4 on idle; moderate fume from mouth; capture 90%; a lot of
turbulence due to draft
1630 Slag skim (2 minutes 10 seconds); fume heavy; pouring rate fast;
a lot of turbulence in hood; continuous spillage and penetration
substantial; 20-40% OP; capture 70%
Note: Crane operator has ladle too low and distant from No. 4
1635 No. 4 placed on idle due to smoke curtailment
1700 No. 4 rolled in for cleanup slag blow
1705 Silica addition; no visible emission from 1° or 2° hood
1716 Roll out No. 4; fume very heavy during roll out; capture <50%
1718 Slag skim (3 minutes 35 seconds); fume heavy; pouring at moderate
rate; spillage moderate to light and intermittent, 30% of time
(20% OP); penetration continuous but light (20%); capture ranged
from 80-90%; overall 85%
Note: Ladle well located this time; also some delay before
pouring
1726 Adding large blocks of blister Cu; method: drop in with chain;
fume light to moderate for 5 seconds; capture 100%
1728 Blister addition; same as above
1731 Blister addition; same as above
1733 Blister addition; same as above
1735 Blister addition; same as above
1736 Roll in for finish blow; capture 100%
1823 No. 4 roll out for smoke
(continued)
H-24
-------
Log Book No. 1 No. 4 Converter
1827 Charged ladle of Cu spills (15 seconds); fume heavy to very
heavy; spillage, none; penetation light; capture 95%
1832 Blister addition; fume heavy; penetration out of top; capture 90%
1834 Blister addition; dropped piece of blister; fume very heavy;
light penetration/no spillage; capture 95%
1900 No. 4 rolled back in on finish blow
1905 Tuyere punching; no visible emission from 1° or 2°
1931 No. 4 rolled out for smoke; capture >60%
2000 No. 4 rolled back in for finish blow
2033 Ladle of powdered scrap; fume extremely heavy; some escaping at
air jet; scrap caught fire; fume completely engulfed the con-
verter and the 2° hood; capture 80% prior to fire
2035 No. 4 rolled back in for finish blow
2100 No. 4 still on finish blow
2115 No. 4 roll out; heavy fume for about 5 seconds; penetration
initially about 40%; overall capture 60%
2116 Charged powdered scrap; caught fire; fume and smoke incredible;
capture undeterminable?
H-25
-------
LOG KEPT BY
JAMES NOLAN
PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
P.O. BOX 9863
SEATTLE, WA 98125
PHONE: (206) 344-7355
H-26
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 18, 1983
0805 Roll in and blow
Small amount of smoke (<10% OP) out the slot
0815 2 ladles of scrap charged
Black smoke out the slot (100% OP), smoke out the front of the
hood ranged from 10-13%. Scrap on fire in the converter mouth,
flames almost to the slot in the hood. (According to John Burckle,
the limit switch on the primary hood did not trip. Therefore,
during the scrap charge the hood was on the hold and blow setting.)
Switch manually tripped, improved the capture efficiency dramati-
cally (<10% OP from slot and front).
0835 Hold and blow - no smoke
0900 Hold and blow - no smoke
0907 Roll out (primary back 20-30%; \ minute (~70-80% capture) (maybe
it took a while for limit switch to kick on); 0% rest of time
(>90% capture)
0911 Slag skim - small puffs out front under sheet metal (>90%
capture)
0913 End pour, still rolled out
Some fume dragged out of front by crane
Very low smoke out of hood
0915 Blister skim
Small puffs - 10-20% OP out front under sheet metal (>90%
capture)
0916 End blister skim
No visible emissions from hood
Copper not ready
0921 Charge back to converter
Small puffs out front
0922 Roll in
(continued)
H-27
-------
Log Book No. 2 No. 4 Converter
0923 1° hood down (converter on idle)
0940 Converter on idle to repair leak at SCL plant - no smoke
0950 Still on hold; estimated that repairs will be completed at 1100
1030 Still on hold; blow scheduled for 1040
1046 Roll in (no smoke) hold and blow
1100 Hold and blow (no smoke 1° or 2°)
1109 Roll out - blister skim
20-30% OP out of top for 10 seconds
5-10% out of top right during entire skim
Large ladle on ground
Capture - >90%
Thermal seems to bring smoke further into aisle
1112 End skim (>90% capture)
5-10% OP out the front as the crane pulls out
1115 Blister skim (no smoke visible out front)
Crane holding small ladle (>90%)
1116 End skim, converter still rolled out
No visible smoke out of hood
1122 Blister skim (crane holding small ladle)
5-10% out front right below sheet metal
~90% capture
1123 End skim
Some drag out by crane (>90% capture)
1128 Blister skim (crane holding small ladle)
10-20% out of top right (fairly continuous; one large puff 35%)
80% capture
1129 End skim
1131 Blister skim
70% capture
5-10% OP out slot
40-50% OP out right front
Substantial amount of smoke out the front right
(continued)
H-28
-------
Log Book No. 2' No. 4 Converter
Matte Charging
1200 Missed the first charge
1230 Matte charge
Large volumes of smoke from the charge
Small 5% OP puffs from front
. >90% capture
1240 Primary hood partially down - no smoke
1248 Matte charge
5% OP from front
>95% capture
5-10« from top
Quite a bit of drag out by crane
1249 Hood partially down
1251 Copper slag charge
Huge volumes of smoke
80% OP from top of hood
Seems to be leaking from inspection doors on side; perhaps from
behind the primary hood
Probably 80-90% capture
1258 End
1300 Matte charge
>90% capture
5-10% OP from top
1305 Small anode slag
20-30% OP constant from slot
Some as high as 80%
>90% capture
Huge volumes of smoke
Some drag out by crane
1308 1° hood partially down
Fume released into 2° completely captured
Extremely good shear
1313 Matte charge
>90% capture - constant 20% from slot
Few 10-20% puffs from front as ladle was brought in
Quite a bit of drag out caused by crane
(continued)
H-29
-------
Log Book No. 2 No. 4 Converter
1520 Si02 charge complete
Smoke from back of 2° hood has abated
Small smoke plume (10-20%)
3' x 3" from top left rear
1524 Still 5-10% OP from left, top rear of 2° hood
1525 20-30% OP from left rear of 2° hood
Continuous emission
1530 Still smoking - 10-20% OP from left rear of 2° hood
1532 Smoke has subsided
1544 Pull out and slag skim
Large volumes of smoke (100% OP for a minute)
50-70% capture; most of smoke leaking from front of 2° hood,
thermal blast is too much for hood
1547 Skimmed too much, slag poured over pot
90% capture
Much lower smoke volumes
1552.5 Slag skim (1 minute)
90% capture
60-80% OP from front right part of 2° hood
Thermal blast breaks through hood
1554 After skim is complete the 2° hood settles down and performs
properly; converter is up, 1° hood up, no visible smoke from 2°
hood
1558 Slag skim (2 minutes)
50-70% capture
80% OP out front of hood
Large volumes of smoke coming out below the converter mouth
Slag return hood on reverb not operating
(continued)
H-30
-------
Log Book No. 2 No. 4 Converter
1355 Inspected rear of converter to find leak. A welded plate on the
balloon flue had come loose and was the source of the emission.
No repair anticipated at this time
1408 Roll out
10 seconds, 40% OP puff through slot (70% capture)
>90% after air is off
1410 Scrap charge (1 minute)
Shook scrap around to release from ladle, heavy smoke and flame
>90% capture, some puffs through slot
1411 Roll in and blow
Pour copper and hold for tomorrow a.m.
The hood looked much better today. It seems the crane operator
has a lot to do with how much smoke is generated. The operators
who are slower and more deliberate improve the hood's per-
formance.
H-31
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 20, 1983
0700 On hold
0823 Matte charge (H minutes)
Puff from top 10% of face (40-60% OP)
Fairly constant, 50% OP from slot
80% capture overall (lots of crane drag out)
Unusually smokey charge
Gas is on too, creating more heat
0826 Charge complete
>95% capture
Gas still on, some smoke from converter mouth captured by 2°
0840 Matte charge (25 seconds)
Much better
Almost no smoke from face (some drag out by crane)
10-20% OP puff from slot
>90% capture
0841 >90% capture
Gas still on, converter mouth open
0854 Matte charge (15 seconds)
>90% capture
Very little smoke from face except crane drag out; could not see
slot from right hand side
0855 >95% capture
Gas still on
What is face velocity of exhaust vs. air jet?
Looks like it might eliminate eddys if velocities were matched
better
0910 Matte charge (15 seconds)
10-20% OP from slot
No visible smoke from face except crane drag out
>90% capture
Crane movement really disturbs air flow for 10-15 seconds, small
puffs leak out slot in top of 2° hood
(continued)
H-32
-------
Log Book No. 2 No. 4 Converter
1607 Matte charge (15 seconds)
>95% capture
No visible smoke from hood
Crane drag out moderate
1613 Roll in
1636 No visible emissions from 1° or 2°
1645 No visible emissions from 1° or 2°
1653 Roll out and skim (H minutes) (jet off)
50% capture
Large amount of fume through front of hood
1656 Slag skim (li minutes)
40% OP through slot (fairly continuous)
Puffs of 60-80% from 20% of face area
80/c capture (pretty good considering air jet is off)
Draft on slag spoon hood needs to be increased
1702 Slag skim (3i minutes)
80-90% capture
Hood has problems when the wind kicks up or when the operator
pours too fast
Plume going up the right inside of hood
Some of plume exits hood and is drawn in again
20% OP through slot
40% OP out 50% of face (most is drawn back in near top)
Air jet fan still of
1730 Roll in and blow (finish)
1758 Complete cleanup blow
Roll out
Emissions heavy and substantial amount escapes air curtain
"50-60% capture for a "45 second
Blowing air turned off; substantial emissions continue for
"60-90 seconds and then moderate somewhat
1800 Emissions escaping capture; "20% OP and overall capture
"75%
1803 Pouring stops. Fume inside hood "20% OP; capture eff. now
about 95%; hood open awaiting charge
(continued)
H-33
-------
Log Book No. 2 No. 4 Converter
1810- Charge blister block - very little smoke; essentially all
1815 captured
1817 Roll back into 1° hood; small amount of smoke escapes at top
due to blowing air
1830- Curtailed due to weather (on-hold)
1915
1915 Resume blowing - roll in very clean as compared to roll out;
essentially 99% capture
2000 Curtail - roll out and put on hold
H-34
-------
TEST ON SECONDARY HOOD
NO. 4 CONVERTER
January 22, 1983
0905 Shell charge (20 seconds)
>90% capture
One small puff of 60% OP from right front face
50% OP puffs through slot
0908 Shell charge (30 seconds)
Low smoke
100% capture
0910 Roll in and blow
>90% capture
Large leak from back of converter (lower right)
0920 Leak continues
No smoke from 1° or 2°
0934 Leak has lessened quite a bit
Seems to be from end plate of the converter
0950 Roll out
90% capture
0954 Slag skim (50 seconds) (ladle up)
>90% capture
Small 40% OP puffs from right front of hood drawn back into
hood
The combination of waiting a bit after the roll out and holding
the ladle off the floor really seems to help; 2° hood performed
best I have seen on a slag skim
0959 Slag skim (1 minute 45 seconds) (ladle up)
>90% capture
No fume visible out 2° hood front
Seems to be some leakage through slot
1005 Slag skim (2 minutes 45 seconds) (ladle up)
>90% capture
Slight puffs through slot (10-20% OP)
If smoke gets in between the air jet and the front left plate it
tends to float out of the hood rather than entering the exhaust
(continued)
H-35
-------
Log Book No. 2 No. 4 Converter
1153 Slag skim (4 minutes) (ladle up)
>90% capture
Some 40% OP puffs out front
Ladle should be a bit higher and closer to the converter; looks
like it is 2 feet off the ground and a foot away from the con-
verter
1204 Matte charge (15 seconds)
Crane held in a bit; moderate drag out
>90?0 capture
No visible from 2° during charge
Crane needs to hold a bit longer
1208 Matte charge (20 seconds)
>90% capture
No visible from 2° during charge
Moderate drag out, crane needs to hold longer (maybe 20-30
seconds)
1210 Gas on; converter on idle; curtailment
H-36
-------
APPENDIX I
INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON STUDY OF
PROPOSED EPA METHOD 108
1-1
-------
INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON STUDY
An interlaboratory comparison study was conducted as a
preliminary check on the analysis procedure used in U.S. EPA
Method 108 because a previous study indicated that the atomic
absorption (AA) method used in Method 108 gave lower results (by
a factor of two) than the colorimetric method routinely used by
ASARCO. During the current test program, seven filter samples
and a dust sample from the roaster baghouse were collected
strictly for analytical comparison.
PEDCo digested the one inlet filter, six outlet filters, and
four separate portions of the dust sample according to Method
108. Portions of these samples, the reagent blanks, and the
undigested dust were sent to ASARCO for analysis. ASARCO ana-
lyzed these samples using their colorimetric method and atomic
absorption; both flame and furnace techniques were used. Table I
contains the results of the ASARCO analysis of the solutions
extracted by PEDCo.
ASARCO also digested and analyzed duplicate portions of the
dust sample using different acid matrices. The results of these
analyses are compared with the results ASARCO obtained for the
dust samples digested by PEDCo in Table II. The results compare
very well; neither the digestion matrix nor the analytical method
seem to affect the analysis of these samples.
1-2
-------
TABLE I. ASARCO'S RESULTS FOR INTERLABORATORY SAMPLES
Arsenic,
Sample Description
agent Blank Ml 08
Reagent Blank M108 Bomb
CT501 M108
CT501 M108 Bomb
CT502 Ml08
CT502 M10B Bomb
CT503 M108
CT503 M108 Bomb
CT504 M108
CT504 M108 Bomb
CT505 K108
CT505 Ml08 Bor.b
CT506 M108
CT506 M108 Bomb
CT507 M108
CT507 Ml08 Bomb
CT508 M108
CT50B M108 Bomb
CT509 M108
CT509 M108 Bomb
CT510 M108
CT510 M108 Bomb
C7511A M108
CT511A M108 Bomb
CT511B M108
CT511E Ml 08 Bomb
.£T511C M108
CT511C M108 Bomb
CT511D M108
CT511D M108 Bomb
1983
ASARCO
Lab No.
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
Colormetric
HNO^/HClOi
11.2
.22
.19
.24
1.1
.09
1.3
1.5
1153.
3.6
24.5
.68
19.2
.33
14.9
.31
63.0
1.0
46.3
.58
37.0
.78
268.
2.8
268.
5.0
245.
2.3
275.
4.3
Flame
AA
HaOH/HNCh
12.1
<3.
<3.
<3.
<3.
<3.
<3.
<3.
1238.
3.5
27.
<3.
20.
<3 .
17.
<3.
71.
3.
53.
<3.
35.
<3.
261.
3.
272.
5.4
259.
<3.
270.
5.2
Graphite
HaOH/HNO^
9.75
.22
1.08
1.42
1269.
24.8
18.6
15.6
65.0
45.3
34.8
243.
260.
257.
280.
Furnace
HNO^/HCIO
9.7
.52
.42
.70
1.25
-
.30
1.05
1146.
2.25
22.5
.92
17.5
.90
14.7
.63
62.2
1.27
48.1
.83
35.9
.90
275.
2.51
254.
4.43
229.
2.14
229.
3.97
1-3
-------
TABLE II. ASARCO'S COMPARISON OF VARIOUS DIGESTION MATRICES
Sample
Descrip-
tion
CT511 Bulk
CT511A
CT511B
CT511C
CT511D
505
497 t 498
499 t 500
501 t 502
503 t 504
Arsenic,
Percent
Ooloraetric
*aOH/HH03/ HHOj/HCl
•C1CU BT/HClOd
12.5
13.2
13.4
12.3
13.5
MOH/HHOj
12.7*
13.0
13.6
12.9
13.3
HM03/HC1
12.6
• Average of two replicates
1-4
-------
PEDCo analyzed the split samples using atomic absorption;
both flame and furnace techniques were employed. The results are
contained in Tables III and IV, respectively. A good correlation
was found between the different laboratories, different methods,
and different digestion procedures. For example, a 16 percent
difference was found between PEDCo's and ASARCO's analyses by
flame AA based on the average value of the dust sample and a 15
percent difference was found in the inlet filter sample.
Based on the results of this interlaboratory study, approval
was given for the digestion and analysis of the Method 108 sam-
ples obtained during the current test program. These samples
were digested by PEDCo and split with ASARCO. Table V lists the
results of the flame AA analyses. The ASARCO data listed in this
table are preliminary results obtained by telephone. ASARCO is
currently verifying their results.
1-5
-------
TABLE III. PEDCo'S ARSENIC CONCENTRATIONS
FLAME ATOMIC ABSORPTION
Sample No.
CT501
CT502
CT503
CT504
CT505
CT506
CT507
CT508
CT509
CT510
CT511A
CT511B
CT511C
CT511D
Reagent blank
Volume each
extract, ml
50
50
50
250
50
50
50
50
50
50
250
250
250
250
50
Net
weight, mg
0.3
0.9
0.8
721.4
3.4
1.7
3.7
8.2
9.6
7.7
508.8
508.5
501.6
515.9
-
NaOH
extract,
-
-
-
1470
-
-
-
-
-
-
325
335
314
320
13.6
mg/1
1.0
2.3
1.5
1400
29.1
21.6
17.6
71.8
53.9
43.4
301
313
287
311
11.5
HF/HNO.
mg/1 J
3.92
2.93
2.93
4.16 4.72
6.50
6.10
5.31
5.11
3.13
5.31
4.36 3.53
4.75 7.10
3.77 4.12
4.16 5.51
3.77 4.52
1-6
-------
TABLE IV. PEDCo'S ARSENIC CONCENTRATIONS
GRAPHITE FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION
Volume each
Sample No. extract, ml
CT501
CT502
CT503
CT504
CT505
CT506
CT507
CT508
CT509
CT510
CT511A
CT511B
CT511C
CT511D
Reagent blank
50
50
50
250
50
50
50
50
50
50
250
250
250
250
50
Net
weight, mg
0.3
0.9
0.8
721.4
3.4
1.7
3.7
8.2
9.6
7.7
508.8
508.5
501.6
515.9
-
NaOH
extract, mg/1
1.09
1.64
2.23
-
28.8
22.9
17.8
-
-
-
305.6
268.5
265.7
281.4
12.6
0.29
1.22
1.58
1410
-
-
-
69.6
48.4
41.3
265.0
287.6
239.6
278.4
-
HF/HNO,
mg/1 J
0.23
0.26
0.10
2.64
0.59
0.36
0.36
0.82
0.50
0.52
1.94
3.84
1.61
3.07
<0.23
0.20
0.15
0.13
2.66
0.67
0.36
0.32
1.11
0.76
0.95
2.59
4.84
2.17
3.77
0.26
1-7
-------
TABLE V. COMPARISON OF METHOD 108 RESULTS
Sample No.
CT442/449
CT443/450
CT444/451
CT445/452
CT446/453
CT447/454
CT448/430
CT461
CT462
CT463
CT464
CT465
CT466
CT479
CT467
CT468
CT469
CT470
CT471
CT472
CT480
Reagent Blank
Reagent Blank
ASARCO,
nig/liter
50
51
12.1
82
82
34
<2
2
<2
3
2
2
<2
<2
8.1
24
<2
9.6
114
9.8
<2
<2
<2
PEDCo,
mg/IJter
65
66
19.1
93
96
44
4.5
5.6
3.9
<3.4
5.4
3.9
<3.4
<3.4
11.9
36
<3.4
12.7
134
13.2
<3.4
<3.4
<3.4
Type
of sample
Filter
Filter
Filter
Filter
Filter
Filter
Filter (blank)
Probe rinse
Probe rinse
Probe rinse
Probe rinse
Probe rinse
Probe rinse
Probe rinse (blank)
Impinger
Impinger
Impinger
Impinger
Impinger
Impinger
Impinger (blank)
1-8
-------
|