United States Office of Budget
Environmental Protection The Division
Agency Comptroller
2400 — Planning and Budgeting
&EPA
EPA
Resource
Planning and Budgeting
Manual
1985 Edition
-------
&EPA TRANSMITTAL
CLASSIFICATION NO.: 2400 1985 Edition
APPROVAL DATE: 2/15/85
RESOURCE PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANUAL
1. PURPOSE. This Transroittal provides a new version of the
Planning and Budgeting Manual and informs you that, its name
has changed to the Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual.
2. EXPLANATION. This Manual describes EPA1s resource planning
and budgeting process. The process is a cyclical activity
that begins with the formulation of long range plans and
budgets, and continues through the obligation and expenditure
of funds. It provides both summary-level and detailed material
to ensure that it addresses the needs of a variety of readers.
3. SUPERSESSION. 1980 Edition of the Planning and Budgeting
Manual and Transmittal 1.
4- FILING INSTRUCTIONS. Post your receipt date of this
Transmittal on the Checklist in the Manual and file the
attached material in a three-ring binder. Retain the revised
Chapter 6, dated 6/4/84, as part of your 1985 Edition.
Remove Insert
1980 Planning and 1985 Resource Planning
Budgeting Manual, and Budgeting Manual
except Chapter 6
Management and Organzation Division
ORIGINATOR: Budget Operations Division, Office of the Comptroller
EPA Form 1315-12 (R»v. 7-82) REPLACES EPA FORMS 131S-1A AND THE PREVIOUS EDITION OF 1315-12.
-------
CHECKLIST OF EPA TRANSMITTALS
TITLE
When kept current, this checklist permits the user to see at a glance which transmittals have been filed.
SERIES
NUMBER
DATE
INI-
TIAL
SERIES
NUMBER
DATE
INI-
TIAL
SERIES
NUMBER
DATE
INI-
TIAL
EPA Form 1315-4 (Rev. 7-73)
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
-------
\
EPA
RESOURCE
PLANNING AND BUDGETING
MANUAL
-------
2400
2/1/85
EPA'S RESOURCE PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANUAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLES CHAPTER NUMBERS
Introduction 1
Overview of EPA's Planning and Budgeting Process 2
Formulating the EPA Portion qf the President's Budget 3
Planning and Budgeting for the Operating Year 4
Managing and Controlling Resources in the Current Year 5
Performance of Commercial Activities 6
Accounting for Program Performance 7
Where to Go for Help 8
APPENDICES
Schedule for the FY 87 Budget Process Appendix A
Abbreviations and Definitions of Terms Appendix B
RMIS Forms Appendix C
Planning and Control Structure Appendix D
Appropriation Codes and Titles
Media Codes and Titles
Function Codes and Titles
Budget/Program Structure and Codes
Appropriation Authorization Codes and Titles
National Program Manager Codes and Titles
RPIO/Allowance Holder Codes and Titles
Budget/Program Structure (BUDELEM SORT)
Program Element Definitions
Index of Planning and Accounting Reports Appendix E
-------
2400
2/1/85
EPA'S RESOURCE PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANUAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLES CHAPTER NUMBERS
Listing of Other Relevant Documents Appendix F
Sample Memo Accompanying First Advice of Allowance
Describing Limitations on the Obligation of Funds
Annotated Crosswalk of FMS and RMIS Object Classes
Policy and Procedure Memoranda Appendix G
3-D Operating Under a Continuing Resolution
4-1 Unobligated Carryover Funds
5-D Funding of Discrimination - Investigations and Hearings
6-1 Advices of Allowance for Constructions Grants
9-F Recovery and Use of Construction Grant Funds
17-A Extramural Procurement Plan Development and Implementation
20-A Limitation on Rate of Obligation
Funds Control Manual Appendix H
(To be included at a later date)
11
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION SECTION
TITLES NUMBERS
Purpose of this Manual 1
Organization 2
Updates 3
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
1. PURPOSE OF THIS MANUAL
This Manual describes EPA's Planning and Budgeting process — a cyclical
activity that begins with the formulation of long range plans and budgets, and
continues through the obligation and expenditure of funds. The Manual
describes EPA's objectives and responsibilities for planning and budgeting,
and each of the key steps in the process. The Manual provides both
summary-level and detailed material, to ensure that it addresses the needs of
a variety of readers — Agency managers and staff; Headquarters and Regional
participants in the process; and program professionals as well as
professionals primarily involved in administrative and financial management.
The objectives of the Manual are to provide participants in the planning
and budgeting process with:
o An overview of the process and its objectives;
o A step-by-step description of how the process works;
o A clear description of the roles and responsibilities of the key
players;
o An understanding of closely related processes (e.g., management
accountability); and,
o Reference materials (e.g., definitions, forms and instructions).
2. ORGANIZATION
In addition to the Introduction, this Manual includes seven more chapters
and eight appendices.
Chapter 2 presents an overview and summary of EPA's planning and budgeting
process. In addition, this chapter describes the broader context of the
federal government's overall process for formulating and executing its budget.
As described in Chapter 2, EPA's planning and budgeting process is a
cyclical activity, consisting of three major phases: the Budget Formulation
phase, the Budget Review phase, and the Budget Execution phase. Each of these
three phases is described in Chapters 3, 4 and 5, respectively.
1-1
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Chapters 6 and 7 describe two EPA management processes that are closely
related to planning and budgeting. Chapter 6 describes EPA's A-76 process
for assessing whether certain EPA functions should be performed in-house or
through external procurements. Chapter 7 describes EPA's major management
accountability processes. The main text of the Manual is rounded off with
Chapter 8, which provides an index and guidance on where to turn for addi-
tional information on the planning and budgeting process.
The Appendices provide a range of reference and other information.
Appendix A presents the timeline for planning and budgeting activities for the
Fiscal Year 1987 (FY87) budget cycle. Appendix B contains abbreviations and
definitions. Appendix C contains RMIS forms and instructions. Appendix D
defines EPA's planning and control structure. Appendix E contains an index of
planning and accounting reports. Appendix F presents a list of other relevant
documents. Appendix G contains the relevant policy and Procedure Memoranda
and Appendix H is a separate document, the Funds Control Manual.
3. UPDATES
This Manual will be updated on a periodic basis. It is contained in a
three-ring binder to make it easy to substitute new or revised sections as
they are issued.
1-2
-------
2. OVERVIEW
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 2 - OVERVIEW OF EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION/SUBSECTION SECTION/SUBSECTION
TITLES NUMBERS
Purpose 1
Overview of the Federal Planning and
Budgeting Process 2
Overview of EPA's Planning and
Budgeting Process 3
An Overview of How EPA Manages Three Planning
and Budgeting Cycles Concurrently 4
Preparing the Agency Operating Guidelines 4. a
Presenting Congressional Materials and Testimony 4.b
Preparing the Operating Plan; the September 15
Submission to OMB 4.c
EPA's Planning and Budgeting Classification Structure 5
Enabling Statutes 5.a
Appropriations 5.b
Overview S.b.l
Limit at ions 5. b. 2
Media 5.c
Functions 5.d
Subactivities 5.e
Budget Elements 5.f
Program Elements 5.g
Aggregations 5.h
FIGURES TITLES FIGURE NUMBERS
Overview of the Federal Planning and Budgeting Process... 2-1
Overview of EPA's Planning and Budgeting Process 2-2
EPA's Three Concurrent Planning and Budgeting Cycles 2-3
An Example of EPA's Budget Classification Structure 2-4
An Example of a Program Element Code Structure 2-5
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 2 - OVERVIEW OF EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS
1. PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER
This chapter represents a brief overview of EPA's planning and budgeting
process. The intent is to familiarize readers with EPA's responsibilities and
objectives for planning and budgeting, EPA's process for meeting these objec-
tives, and the roles of the key players in this process. In addition, this
chapter provides an overview of EPA's budget classification structure and
helps set the context for subsequent chapters of this Manual, which describe
each of the phases of EPA's planning and budgeting process in more detail.
2. OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS
The federal budgeting process is a cyclical activity that begins almost
twenty months before the start of a fiscal year, and concludes with the actual
obligation and expenditure of funds during that year. Figure 2-1 on the fol-
lowing page provides an overview of the federal budgeting process. To make
the Figure easier to understand, it shows the key steps for the budget cycle
that will culminate with the federal budget for Fiscal Year 1987 ("FY 87").
As shown in Figure 2-1, there are three major phases in the federal budgeting
process:
• The Formulation of the President's Budget.
Formulation of the President's budget and Agency justifications
supporting that budget are subject to the policies and instruc-
tions described in OMB Circular A-ll.
In January, the President submits a proposed budget for the up-
coming fiscal year, which begins on October 1 of that year. As
shown in Figure 2-1, the President's Budget culminates more than
a year's worth of work and consultation on the part of the Pres-
ident, OMB and the federal departments and agencies.
• Congressional Budget Review and Decision-Making, and Development
of Departmental and Agency Operating Plans
After the submission of the President's Budget in January, Con-
gress reviews the budget and passes appropriations bills which
are subsequently signed by the President, usually by late summer
or early fall. Each of the federal departments and agencies is
involved in two sets of activities related to the upcoming fis-
cal year. First, they provide testimony and written material to
Congress in support of the President's Budget.
2-1
-------
Figure 2-1
MAJOR STEPS IN THE FEDERAL PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS
PERIOD BEFORE THE FISCAL YEAR
February, 1985
BUDGET FORMULATION PHASE
T
ISCAL YEAR 1987?^
January, 1986
October 1, 1986
September 30. 1987
EXECUTION OF ENACTED BUDGET
O
C
n
ro
3
H-
3
TO
0)
3
N3
I
K5
Spring: Departments and agencies begin
planning for FY87
Summer: Departments and agencies prepare
FY87 budget requests and submit
them to OMB
Fall: President and OMB review
requests; OMB holds hearings
Early Winter: Final decisions on contents of President's Budget
Mid-January: President submits
Budget to Congress
BUDGET REVIEW PHASE
Departments and agencies obligate funds in
accordance with their Operating Plans and
within limitations of apportionments and
other restrictions.
Departments and agencies determine carryover
funds from FY86, and request apportionment of
these funds; OMB issues carryover apportionments.
Departments and agencies reprogram funds (after
receiving necessary OMB and Congressional
approvals, where needed).
to
C
CL
TO
(0
3
TO
03
Feb.-Sept. 30: Congress considers President's
Budget and passes appropriations
bills, which are then sent to the
President for signature
Feb.-Sept. 30: Departments and agencies provide
materials and testimony to Congress
and prepare detailed Operating Plans
Late Sept.:
OMB apportions funds
for departments and
agencies for FY87
NJ
I— K3
CO O
l_n O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Second, the departments and agencies prepare detailed operating
plans for the upcoming fiscal year, based on expected resources.
These plans describe specific activities and details on how the
departments and agencies will allocate their expected resources
among their various organizational units.
• Execution of the Budget in the Current Year
Shortly before the beginning of the fiscal year, OMB "appor-
tions" funds for each federal, department and agency for the fis-
cal year. Following apportionment, the departments and agencies
allocate these resources among their organizational units, and
obligate the resources in accordance with their operating plans
and within other applicable limits. In addition, fairly early
in the fiscal year, each department and agency determines how
much "carryover" spending authority is available, based on the
final close-out of the preceding fiscal year. ("Carryover"
funds are funds that are: (1) not obligated by the end of a
fiscal year; and (2) may be obligated in the next fiscal year
according to the terms of the appropriations legislation that
first made these funds available.) The departments and agencies
then submit a request to OMB for an apportionment of this carry-
over spending authority for the current fiscal year.
Because of the length of the process, the federal government must work
concurrently on as many as three cycles at once — a new cycle begins before
the preceding one finishes. Each year, each department and agency is execu-
ting its budget for the current fiscal year, working with OMB and the Presi-
dent to seek funds from Congress for the upcoming fiscal year, and formulating
a basic plan and budget for the year after that.
The Federal budgeting process is governed by several documents which pro-
vide directions to Agencies and Departments in the formulation of their
budgets:
• OMB Circular A-ll is the primary governing document. It provides in-
structions to the agencies on the schedule and content of the agen-
cies' budget submission to the President.
• OMB Circular A-10 sets Federal policy on confidentiality of the budget
data prior to the President's submission to Congress in January.
• OMB Circular A-19 provides for a legislative clearance process. Agen-
cies are required to clear testimony, legislative proposals and com-
munications with OMB to determine whether these are consistent with
Presidential policies.
2-3
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• OMB Circular A-34 sets Federal policy for the execution of the budget.
3. OVERVIEW OF EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS
EPA has established a formal planning and budgeting process to ensure that
the Agency meets its responsibility in this area not only in a technical sense
(e.g., meeting OMB's technical requirements) but also in a manner that ensures
wide participation by key Agency managers and staff. While successive senior
management teams at EPA have adjusted and revised the process, one of the
central tenets has always been that a participative process is the best
approach to use in attempting to produce high quality plans and budgets.
The following subsections briefly summarize each phase of EPA's planning
and budgeting process. This process is also depicted in an overview flowchart
in Figure 2-2. The chart illustrates the different phases of three budget
cycles progressing concurrently. A detailed description and flow chart of
each phase is provided in subsequent chapters of this Manual.
a. Budget Formulation Phase
(1) Overview of Objectives
In this phase, EPA is responsible for developing and submitting
to OMB a detailed request for funds to be included in the President's Budget.
In February of each year, EPA begins formulating its budget for the fiscal
year beginning one year from the coming October. For example, in February,
1985, EPA will begin formulating its proposed budget for FY 87. In September
of each year, EPA submits its proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning in
one year to OMB. For example, EPA's proposed budget for FY 87 is due at OMB
in mid September 1985. After negotiations with OMB in the Autumn, EPA's
portion of the President's Budget is established. EPA is then responsible for
helping OMB finalize the President's Budget for submission to Congress in the
following January, and preparing a variety of materials to be used by the
President in defending the budget.
(2) Overview of the Process
The following are the major steps in EPA's process for the Bud-
get Formulation phase; for details, see Chapter 3.
(a) Issuance of the Agency Guidance
The Agency Operating Guidance is issued in February of each
year. It contains goals and strategies for the Operating Year and the Budget
Year. The Budget Year portion of the Guidance describes the Administrator's
views on the initiatives to be pursued and the issues to be addressed in that
fiscal year.
2-4
-------
Figure 2-2
AN OVERVIEW OF ERA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS
OCT NOV DE(
84 84 84
JAN FEB M
85 85 t
1 r
CARRYOVER
D1STRIBU- ,
TION |
1 REVISEI
l» ADVICE!
ALLOWAr
1 '
AR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPTEMBER n,T NOV
5 85 85 85 85 85 85 ^ ™
DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPTEMBER OCT NOV DEC J
85 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 66 86 86 !
AN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPTEMBER
!7 87 87 87 . 87 87 87 87 87
' • /OMB/N
yTreasuryy
OF
CE
ALLOWANCE HOLDERS COMMIT/OBLIGATE FUNDS; REQUEST REPROGRAMMINGS ^ •->• YEAR RE"
CONCILIA-
0MB
PASSBACK
FOR FY86
SUBMISSION OF
/PRESIDENT'S fc
FY86 BUDGET '
TO CONGRESS
4
E
^ WORKLOAD
1~
AGENCY
OPERATING
FY86, 87
CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW; ( ijr
* PAiSAGt Oh APPROPK1AIIONS , ' "
FOR FY86; PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL!/ ALLOTMENT
A T ADVICES OF
' " lJ ' ALLOWANCE
„. PHASE II PHASE III APPOS-
*" OPERATING ^ OPERATING ^ IION-
FY86
PHASE I *• ^
—^OPERATING ' ?
PLAN HB6 REPRCGRAMMNG REQUESTS TO
am AND CONGRESS
I
PRELIMINARY
1 BUDGET
<>• FORMULA- — |
FOR FY87 NPM INTERNAL IY87 OMB
lfc RIIDGFT ^ REVIE1K « ^ UinCPT ^ D»«m
" REQUEST " APPEALS " SUB- " FOR FY
FOR FY87 FV87 MISSION
TO OMB
FOOTNOTES:
I/ The OC must approve all reprogrammlng requests.
Approval by Congress or OMB may be required for certain reprogrammlng requests.
(See Chapter 5 for details).
2/ In some cases, final appropriations may not be enacted by September 30. In such
cases, EPA operates under a continuing r«nlut1on. (See Chapter 5 for details).
-. S
i I
> f
CARRYOVER ^** *^
DTtor- i f^w&/\
^ IncuTccn 1 V Treasury/
*» ADVICES OF ^^ -^
ALLOWANCE i .
V
END OF YEAS
TION
w!*'-'5'?11 OF CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW-
~~^ FY87 BUDGET *" PASSAGE OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FY87;
TO CONGRESS PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL 2/ | ^
— 1 f L— ' ' 1 OF fUNDS
V tPA MAItRiALS ANU ltilIMUN» ADVICES OF
WORKLOAD > ' ' T
^.. ANAI Yi": ^ i i i 1 r1 1 T
^ FOR FY87 ^ PHASE " P"*^ "' APPOR-
OPERATING ^. OPERATING k. TION- J ALLOt
' i 1^ PLAN FOR PLAN FOR MENT
PHASt 1 ^ hY87 hY87
OPERATING i
«r.CNrv te. PLAN FOR +
flPFBHTING . FY8.7 RFPRORRAIMI'IG RFQIIF5T-; Til
GUIDANCE OMB AND CONGRESS
FY87. 88 1 1
1 H SUB
*• PRE
PRELIMIN- FTB
ARY BUDGET I°_
» FORMULA- ,
TION FOR i r= 1
FY88 TAS^ACK
NPM INTERNAL FY88 fc cno cv<»
b>. BUDGET te. REVIEWS t to. BUDGET f
REQUEST *^ APPEALS "~ SUB- ' '
FY88 FOR FY88 MISSION
TO OHB '
1 '
CARRYOVER
DISTRIBU- -I
TION j
1 REVISED
L> ADVICES OF
ALLOWANCE
1
IANCE HOLDERS COMMIT/OBLIGATE FUNDS; REQUEST REPROGRAMMINGS^
SIDENT'VF ^. CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW;
MN6RESS "~ r~^'REUSriDYlfT"w"1AT'PROV>ALrU"27<>0'
A 1 A *
T T T ALLOTMENT
1 ' " ' ' OF FUNDS
EPA MATERIALS AND TESTIMONY ^^ ^
ALLOWANCE
t. ANArrr*™ > """ " rwtx '" :
FYSS"' OPERATING 3PERATIN6 T^T" :
PUN FOR *• PLAN FOR >. JJ™ -" 5
PHASE I *• !
OPERATING , •
PUN mil i
AGENCY ^ f»88 1 ' :
IJITQANCC • RFPROGMMMTNfi RFQIIFSTS TO !
FY88~'89 ra* *"" r-nnKRESS |
•
i
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(b) Preliminary Budget Formulation
In April, senior EPA managers (at the program level) hold a
series of meetings to discuss program emphasis, new program starts or cut-
backs, issues to be addressed in the Budget Year, and guidelines for the Bud-
get Year based on current Congressional actions. During this period, the
Administrator and Deputy Administrator communicate to the Assistant Admin-
istrators (AAs), the Regional Administrators (RAs) and the Office of the Comp-
troller (OC) the targets or directions for EPA set by the President. In the
context of these meetings, the AAs and RAs begin or continue preliminary work
on their plans and budgets for the Budget Year.
(c) Technical Call Letter and Initial Budget Requests
In late May or early June, the Office of the Comptroller
issues a Call Letter requesting initial workyear and dollar resource requests
for the Budget Year for each of the media. The Call Letter, which contains
guidance, targets, and forms, is sent to the National Program Managers (NPMs).
All Assistant Administrators are NPMs, and as such are responsible for formu-
lating budget requests for the Budget Year for their media (e.g., air, water,
Superfund). In addition, in the Call Letter the Office of the Comptroller
confirms a "Lead Region" for each media. For example, Region VI might be the
Lead Region for planning all Water Quality programs. The Deputy Regional
Administrator (DRA) for that Region is called the "Lead DRA" and is respon-
sible for working with the NPM for Water in developing dollar and workyear
estimates for Regional Water Quality programs.
Work by the NPMs and Lead DRAs in formulating their re-
source requests continues through June and into July. In early July the NPM
submission is due to the Office of the Comptroller.
(d) Internal Reviews and Appeals
In July, the Comptroller compiles the NPM submissions into
an Agency composite and briefs the Administrator and Deputy Administrator on
its contents. In July and August the Admininstrator and Deputy Administrator
hold a series of reviews (coordinated by the Office of the Comptroller) in
which the NPMs justify their requested levels of resources for the Budget
Year. Based on the results of these reviews, the Office of the Comptroller
makes appropriate changes to the NPMs1 submissions and then "passes back" the
changed version to the NPMs for review. The NPMs have the option of appealing
the changes to their submissions to the Administrator or Deputy Administrator.
This internal review process is completed by the end of August.
2-6
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(e) Preparation of the Mid September Submission to OMB
Once the Administrator has made final decisions on the re-
source levels to be requested, the NPMs prepare narrative justifications for
these levels. The Office of the Comptroller then prepares a consolidated
Agency budget request and submits it to OMB by the middle of September.
(f) OMB Hearings and the Passback
After receiving EPA's submission, OMB holds a series of
hearings during which senior Agency managers (e.g., the Administrator and Dep-
uty Administrator; the NPMs) justify the requested level of resources. When
the hearings are complete, generally in November, OMB sends a revised version
of EPA's budget for EPA to review. This revised version is often referred to
as the "passback".
(g) Appeals
After receiving the passback, the Administrator has 48 to
72 hours to prepare and return an appeal to OMB. If the Administrator submits
an appeal, a second passback and appeal process occurs in December. If, after
receiving OMB's second passback, the Administrator feels that OMB's final de-
cisions are not acceptable, he or she has the option of appealing to the Pres-
ident. The past several presidents have relied on their senior staff and the
Budget Review Board to review and decide appeals.
(h) Final Preparation of EPA's Portion of the President's
Budget
During the October to December time period, the NPMs com-
plete and fine tune their narrative justifications which will accompany the
President's Budget submission to Congress. The Office of the Comptroller also
prepares other analyses. All material prepared by EPA must reflect the final
levels of requested resources (i.e., after all appeals have been decided) and
must be in accordance with the guidelines specified in OMB Circular A-ll.
(i) Submission of the President's Budget and Issuance of EPA's
"Summary of the Budget"
By law, the President's Budget must be submitted to Con-
gress within 15 legislative days of the start of the new session in January.
EPA produces a congressional justification of its budget estimates and a
booklet called "Summary of the Budget" for public distribution. The EPA
Administrator or a designee holds a press conference to highlight the salient
issues in the EPA portion of the President's Budget.
2-7
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
b. The Budget Review Phase
(1) Overview of Objectives
The principal objective of the Budget Review phase is to develop
an Operating Plan for the upcoming fiscal year (the "Operating Year"). The
Operating Plan is a detailed and accurate plan for EPA operations and resource
expenditures in the Operating Year.
The development of the Operating Plan requires substantial
amounts of work on the part of Agency managers; it is not simply an exercise
of making minor adjustments to the EPA portion of the President's Budget.
First, some of the assumptions that went into that budget may no longer be
valid. Second, priorities for EPA may have changed. Third, final Congres-
sional action on the President's Budget may require EPA to adjust its plans
for the upcoming fiscal year — for example, Congress may enact new programs
that had not been anticipated in the President's Budget.
(2) Overview of the Process
The eight-month Budget Review phase, which is aimed towards pre-
paring an Operating Plan for the upcoming fiscal year, generally follows two
tracks:
• An external track, in which the President's Budget is de-
fended before the Congress. EPA's responsibility is to
prepare a variety of materials in support of the EPA por-
tion of the President's Budget, and to testify before the
House and Senate HUD and Independent Agencies Appropri-
ations Committees and relevant Authorization Committees.
• An internal track, in which EPA develops a detailed Opera-
ting Plan for the upcoming fiscal year. As one part of
developing the Operating Plan, EPA must decide how to dis-
tribute its expected resources for the upcoming fiscal year
among the Regions. (The President's budget request for EPA
breaks out total resources requested for Regional opera-
tions, but does not break out these resources for indivi-
dual Regions.)
There are important connections between these two tracks since
Congressional activity on EPA's budget will effect internal planning and re-
programming at EPA. For example, during the summer, Congress may indicate
that it will appropriate more (or less) resources to EPA than requested by the
President. EPA must track Congressional action, and incorporate revisions in
resources into the Operating Plan.
2-8
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
In brief summary, the following are the major steps in EPA's
process for developing its Operating Plan; for details, see Chapter 4.
(a) Interaction With Congress
Congressional review of the EPA portion of the President's
Budget begins in late January or early February. While the focus of the re-
view remains with the Appropriations Committees, as many as forty committees
and subcommittees may want to be involved. Throughout the Budget Review
phase, EPA managers and staff are responsible for preparing backup and
briefing material for Congress, briefing Congressional staff, and testifying
at committee and subcommittee hearings.
(b) Issuance of the Agency Operating Guidance
In February, the Administrator issues the Agency Operating
Guidance. The portion of this document that addresses the Operating Year
provides overall direction for the development of the Operating Plan.
(c) Phase I Operating Plan
By late March, EPA also prepares an initial, "Phase I"
version of its Operating Plan. This version of the Operating Plan distributes
the Headquarters totals found in the President's Budget among Headquarters
"Allowance Holders". An "Allowance Holder" is a manager who is responsible
for implementing a part of the Operating Plan and for reporting on the
progress of the program and the budget. In addition, during Phase I, the
Headquarters resources are distributed by object class — a greater level of
detail describing the nature of goods or services itemized in the budget.
(d) Allocation of Workyear Targets by Region
In developing its Operating Plan for the upcoming fiscal
year, one of EPA's objectives is to decide how to distribute its workyear and
dollar resources among the ten Regional Offices. By late March, in addition
to developing the Phase I Operating Plan, EPA allocates workyears for each
program by Region. This allocation is based largely on the results of
"workload modeling", an exercise led by the NPMs in consultation with Regions.
"Workload models" are quantitative tools used to estimate levels of activities
and associated resource requirements among the Regions. Workload models
reflect workforce planning efforts by the NPMs to ensure the right level and
mix of skills in the future. See Chapter 4 of this Manual for details on
workload modeling.
2-9
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(e) Phase II and Phase III Operating Plans
From early April through late September, EPA develops
successively more detailed versions of its Operating Plan. The Phase II
version is completed by late July. One of the key objectives of this version
of the Plan is to develop within certain administrative and congressional
constraints proposed realignments of workyear and dollar resources requested
for EPA in the President's Budget, for example to reflect updated assumptions
about the pattern of EPA activities in the upcoming fiscal year. Another key
objective of the Phase II Plan is develop a greater level of detail in the
proposed allocation of Regional and Headquarters resources. The Phase III
Operating Plan, completed by mid-September, contains necessary revisions to
the Phase II Plan to accommodate EPA appropriations as finally enacted. In
addition, the Phase III plan contains details not addressed in the Phase II
version (e.g., quarterly distributions of all resources; detailed contract
plans; Regional ADP timeshare plans). The Phase III Operating Plan is
submitted to OMB and Congress for review, and where necessary, approval. On
rare occasion EPA's appropriations are not enacted in time for the October 1
startup of the new fiscal year; in this case, the final version of the Phase
III plan is delayed, and EPA operates under a continuing resolution. (For
details, see Chapter 5.)
(f) Apportionment
In September, EPA also submits a request to OMB describing
how the Agency would like to have its resources apportioned — i.e., made
available for obligation on a quarter-by-quarter basis for the upcoming fiscal
year. OMB issues its apportionment of EPA's resources just before the start
of the new fiscal year. The apportionment is generally based on the Phase III
Operating Plan.
c. Budget Execution Phase
(1) Overview of Objectives
The fiscal year of Budget Execution begins on October 1st and
continues for twelve months, to the next September 30th. EPA's objective is
to carry out its statutory missions and obligate funds in accordance with its
Operating Plan. The Anti-Deficiency Act stipulates that EPA cannot incur
obligations in excess of its apportioned resources and must follow applicable
rules in shifting - reprogramming - funds, including requirements for advance
Comptroller approval in all cases, and OMB and Congressional approval in some
cases. In addition, to help ensure effective execution of its Operating Plan,
EPA must conduct periodic management accountability reviews. The relevant OMB
Circular for the Budget Execution Phase is Circular A-34.
2-10
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(2) Overview of the Process
The following are the major steps in EPA's process for Budget
Execution; for details, see Chapter 5.
(a) Distribution of Allowances
At EPA, all funds are apportioned to a single official, the
Comptroller, who in turn gives one allotment to the Budget Director who is the
Agency's Allotment Holder. The Comptroller is legally accountable for
assuring that obligations are made in accordance with statutory requirements
and that spending authority is not exceeded. The single Agency allotment is
subdivided into "Allowances" which provide quarterly obligation authority to
specific officials ("Allowance Holders") to commit and obligate specific
portions of the Agency's Operating Plan. The Allowance Holders manage the
allowances and are responsible for staying within workyear and fund ceilings.
Allowances are issued by appropriation and are derived from EPA's Operating
Plan. The Comptroller issues one or more "Advices of Allowance" to each
Allowance Holder, corresponding to each Allowance held by that manager. These
documents tell each Allowance Holder exactly how much of what type of
resources are available for executing his or her program responsibilities.
(b) Distribution of Carryover Funds
By November of the new fiscal year, the Office of the
Comptroller determines the types and amounts of carryover funds available for
obligation in the Current Year. Allowance Holders may submit requests for
using these funds. The requests for Carryover funds are reviewed by the
Office of the Comptroller and a distribution is recommended to the Adminis-
trator for approval. Approved amounts, which are subject to the same limita-
tions as the original appropriations, are issued in new Advices of Allowance.
Therefore, for example, an Allowance Holder may hold two Abatement, Control
and Compliance (AC&C) allowances for a particular program for a particular
fiscal year: one funded from an appropriation enacted for that year, and the
other funded from carryover funds.
(c) Commitment, Obligation, Charging and Expenditure of Funds
During the fiscal year, Allowance Holders commit, obligate,
charge and expend funds in accordance with their portion of the Operating Plan
and within the limits established by their Advices of Allowance. These
actions are recorded and accounted for in the Agency's Financial Management
System (FMS), a computerized accounting system. EPA's Financial Management
Manual gives detailed guidance on the processes for committing, obligating and
expending funds.
2-11
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(d) Reprogrammings
During the Current Year, Allowance Holders may find that
certain accounts do not have sufficient resources to cover all expected needs
for the year. In such cases, Allowance Holders can initiate requests to
reprogram funds from one account to another. These requests are submitted to
the Office of the Comptroller where they are reviewed for budgetary and
programmatic impact and -to determine if the change exceeds Congressional, OMB,
or Agency limitations. In addition, in some cases, a requested reprogramming
is reviewed by senior Agency management for acceptability on policy or general
management grounds.
If the applicable limitations are not exceeded, and if the
reprogramming is acceptable on policy and management grounds, the change is
implemented, and the Office of the Comptroller issues a revised Advice of
Allowance to the affected Allowance Holder(s). In some cases, the requests
are held pending OMB and Congressional approval.
(e) Periodic Management Accountability Reviews
Shortly before the start of a new fiscal year, key Agency
managers (Headquarters and Regional) develop performance commitments for the
soon-to-be-started fiscal year. The goals expressed in the Operating Plan
represent the full range of performance commitments. In addition, a subset of
these commitments is recorded in the Strategic Planning and Management System
(SPMS) and other program-specific tracking systems. Once the new fiscal year
begins, these performance commitments are tracked throughout' the year. (See
Chapter 7 for details.)
4. AN OVERVIEW OF HOW EPA MANAGES THREE PLANNING AND BUDGETING CYCLES
CONCURRENTLY
The preceding discussion provides a brief overview of each of the individ-
ual phases of a single planning and budgeting cycle. At any given time, how-
ever, EPA is concurrently involved in planning and budgeting activities asso-
ciated with three fiscal years. As shown in Figure 2-3, each year EPA is
executing its budget for the current fiscal year (the "Current Year"), working
with OMB and the President to seek funds from Congress for the upcoming fiscal
year (the "Operating Year"), and helping OMB and the President formulate the
President's Budget for the year after that (the "Budget Year").
2-12
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
FY1985
1985 =Curr. Yr.
1986 =0per. Yr.
1987 =Bud. Yr.
Figure 2-3
FY1986 FY1987 FY1988 FY1989
1986 =Curr. Yr.
1987 =0per. Yr. 1987 =Curr. Yr.
1988 =Bud. Yr. 1988 =0per. Yr. 1988 = Curr. Yr.
1989 =Bud. yr. 1989 =0per. Yr. Etc.
1990 =Bud. Yr. Etc.
The following are key examples of how EPA manages the overlap:
a. Overlap in Preparing the Agency Operating Guidance
Each February the Administrator and Deputy Administrator issue the
Agency Operating Guidance. This document covers both the upcoming fiscal year
and the Budget Year. When various managers in EPA assist the Administrator
and Deputy Administrator in formulating the Agency Operating Guidance, the
participants must consider policy choices and directions for two years — the
upcoming fiscal year and the year after that. In addition, while producing
the Agency Guidance, the participants must take into account Current Year
activities and performance, and projected end-of-year status. For example, if
the Agency Guidance for the upcoming fiscal year addresses the issue of
whether EPA should finish writing Regulation X, it is important to consider
the expected progress on that regulation by the end of the current fiscal
year.
b. Overlap in Presenting Congressional Materials and Testimony
As described in Section b.(2)(a), EPA is responsible for producing a
variety of materials for Congress and for testifying before Congressional
Committees in support of the President's Budget. Quite often, this material
and testimony must cover several years. For example, an EPA Official may be
asked to comment on current year progress, and to place this in context of the
President's Budget for the upcoming fiscal year as well as EPA's long-range
resource requirements.
c. Overlap in Preparing the Operating Plan, and the Mid September Sub-
mission to OMB
During the spring and summer, EPA prepares the Operating Plan for the
upcoming fiscal year. In addition, EPA is preparing the mid September
2-13
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
submission to OMB which describes the Agency's proposal for the EPA portion of
the President's Budget for the Budget Year. For example, .in the spring and
summer of 1985, EPA will be working on the Operating Plan for FY 86, as well
as the Agency's proposal to OMB for the President's Budget for FY 87. Accord-
ingly, much of the planning and budgeting analysis during the spring and
summer focuses jointly on the upcoming fiscal year (the Operating Year) and
the year after that (the Budget Year). For example, in formulating the
portion of the Operating Plan for FY 86 that addresses water permit issuance
activities in FY 86, the Office of Water also will be engaged in developing
plans and resource estimates regarding permit issuance for FY 87. Of course,
during the same time period, the Office of Water will be executing its Current
Year plan for this area.
5. AN OVERVIEW OF EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
The EPA planning and budgeting structure is a hierarchy with the following
major levels: enabling legislation; appropriations; media; functions; sub-
activities; budget elements; and program elements. These levels are described
in subsections "a" through "i" below. The budget structure is illustrated in
Figure 2-4 on page 2-16.
a. Enabling/Authorizing Statutes
EPA's operating authority is derived from a number of statutes (e.g.,
the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act), most of which address concerns with
particular environmental media: air quality, water quality, drinking water,
hazardous waste, pesticides, radiation, toxic substances and others. These
statutes are divided into individual sections that authorize, and in many
cases, mandate specific types of action on the part of the Agency in such
functional areas as the development of regulations and standards; permitting;
enforcement; direct cleanup; and others.
b. Appropriations
(1) Overview
The enabling legislation is supported annually by appropriations
that provide EPA with spending authority to carry out its missions. Congress
provides EPA with spending authority through six individual appropriations:
Salaries and Expenses (S&E); Abatement, Control and Compliance (AC&C);
Research and Development (R&D); Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund, also
known as Superfund; Construction Grants; and Buildings and Facilities (B&F).
When taken in combination with the functions described in the enabling
statutes (e.g., the Clean Air Act), these categories of funding require com-
plex cross-cutting aggregations of data in EPA's budgeting and accounting
systems. Brief definitions of each appropriation follow.
2-14
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Salaries and Expenses: This appropriation finances salaries and related
costs associated with administering the programs within the Environmental
Protection Agency. It incorporates all costs exclusive of grant programs,
program-specific contractual agreements, and hazardous substance response
actions.
Abatement Control and Compliance: This appropriation includes funds for
contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements for pollution abatement, control
and compliance activities.
Research and Development: This appropriation finances research and
development through contracts, grants, and intergovernmental agreements.
These activities provide the scientific basis for EPA's regulatory actions.
Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund: This appropriation provides
funds for the implementation of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. This Act provides authority for
responding to and cleaning up hazardous substance emergencies and uncontrolled
waste sites.
Construction Grants: This appropriation covers grants made to local
public agencies for construction of municipal wastewater treatment facilities
in order to assist States and localities in attaining and maintaining water
quality standards. It also includes a loan made to Puerto Rico in 1983, to
cover local funding shortfalls, pursuant to the 1983 Territorial Omnibus Act.
Buildings and Facilities: This appropriation provides for construction,
repair, improvement, extension, alterations, and purchase of fixed equipment
or facilities of, or used by EPA.
(2) Limitat ions
An important feature of EPA's budget structure is that the
Agency's appropriations have many built-in limitations. For example, the
Salaries and Expenses (S&E) appropriation provides dollar resources that are
available f:or only one year and for certain categories of object classes
(e.g., personnel compensation and benefits; related intramural expenses). If
EPA fails to obligate any S&E resources in the year for which they are made
available, these resources "lapse" — EPA cannot carry them over into the next
year. On the other hand, resources in the Abatement, Control and Compliance
(AC&C) appropriation are "two-year dollars;"; that is, EPA has up to two years
to obligate these funds. Some of the other appropriations contain "no-year"
dollars, making these resources available for obligation indefinitely, or
unt i1 expended.
EPA's appropriations also contain other types of limitations.
For example, EPA is explicitly prohibited from employing personal cooks,
2-15
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
Figure 2-4
EXAMPLE OF EPA's BUDGET CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
Water Quality Programs
• Authorized by enabling statutes
(e.g., Clean Water Act)
• Funded from appropriations (e.g.,
Abatement, Control & Compliance;
Salaries & Expenses)
§
Research and
Development
Abatement and
Control
Enforcement
CJ
CO
.0
a
Water
Quality
Management
Effluent
Standards &
Guidelines
Grant
Assistance
Programs
Municipal
Source
Control
Water Quality Water Quality
Strategy Monitoring &
Implementation Analysis
o
v
UJ
Waste Treatment
Operations and
Maintenance
Municipal Waste
Treatment Facility
Construction
c
CD
0)
UJ
CO
C
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
chauffeurs or servants; as another example, Agency automobiles must average at
least 22 miles per gallon. In addition, in language in the reports accom-
panying the appropriations to legislation, Congress establishes certain limits
on EPA's discretion to reallocate ("reprogram") funds during the Current Year.
For example, in FY 85 EPA must obtain Senate approval in advance for any
reprogrammings of funds between program elements in excess of $500,000. EPA
must obtain House approval in advance for any such reprogrammings in excess of
$1,000,000. Approval is also needed for any changes to a program or activity
specifically cited in either a Committee Report or the Conference Report. In
addition, there are also other requirements (e.g., any Buildings and
Facilities projects in excess of $500,000 require express Congressional
approval).
c. Media
All EPA activities (and resources) fall with EPA's "media" cate-
gories. Examples of media include "Air Quality," "Water Quality" and
"Pesticides." One media category may be supported by several appropriations.
For example, air programs are funded from the following appropriations:
Salaries and Expenses (S&E); Abatement, Control and Compliance (AC&C); and
Research and Development (R&D).
d. Functions
Media categories are divided into individual "functions." For
example, within the media category "Water Quality," the budget structure is
divided into three functions: Research and Development; Abatement and
Control; and Enforcement.
e. Subactivities
Each function is further subdivided into several broad classifica-
tions called "subactivities." For example, subactivities within the Water
Quality media are: Water Quality Management; Effluent Standards and Guide-
lines; Grant Assistance Programs; Water Quality Strategies Implementation;
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis; and Municipal Source Control.
f. Budget Elements
Subactivities are split further into more specific "budget elements."
For example, in the case of Municipal Source Control, the budget elements are:
Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction; and Waste Treatment Opera-
tions and Maintenance.
In practice, a budget element (sura of two appropriations for a
program) is referred to as a program element and is usually the lowest level
of detail tracked during budget formulation.
2-17
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
g. Program Elements
The lowest level of control in the EPA program budget structure is
the "program element." If a program is funded from only one appropriation (as
is "Waste Treatment Operations and Maintenance"), the terms "budget element"
and "program element" are synonymous. If a program is funded from two appro-
priations (as is "Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction"), the term
"program element" refers to each of the two components of the budget element.
There are over 300 program elements in the EPA program budget structure. Some
are large, covering many workyears and tens of millions of dollars. Others,
such as the Administrator's Representation Fund are very small — this program
element covers approximately $3,000. (Appendix D presents a list of program
elements and their definitions.)
If a program is supported by more than one appropriation, it will
have a program element for each appropriation based on the authorizing section
of the law. Some program elements may be supported by more than one autho-
rizing section of law.
h. Aggregations
Planning and budgeting data at these various levels are aggregated in
various combinations as needs dictate. For example:
• During Current Year Budget Execution, the Office of the
Comptroller generally controls spending by Allowance
Holders by program element, and within program element, by
various individual object classes (e.g., equipment; travel)
or aggregations of object classes.
• In the EPA portion of the President's Budget, the budget
justifications are written at the budget element level, of
which there are 212. These resources are not broken out by
Region; therefore, as part of the development of the
Operating Plan, one of EPA's tasks is to perform a Regional
disaggregation, using "workload modeling" and other
techniques.
• Various Congressional Committees will require testimony and
written materials from EPA regarding the budget at many
different levels of aggregation. For example, in some
cases a Congressional Committee may request an analysis of
resource requirements for particular budget elements. In
other cases, a Committee may want to focus more broadly,
for example with respect to resources for an entire media.
2-18
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
• In presenting the budget to the public and the press, EPA
often aggregates resources to very high levels of aggrega-
tion (e.g., "Water Quality").
Figure 2-5 illustrates how to read a program element code and relate the
program to the overall budget structure.
Figure 2-5
PROGRAM ELEMENT CODE STRUCTURE
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
B 54 B 2 C
APPROPRIATION
PROGRAM ELEMENT
SEQUENCE
MEDIA
FUNCTION
SUBACTIVITY
SEQUENCE
CHARACTER
SUBACTIVITY CODE
APPROPRIATION CODES
A SALARIES & EXPENSES
B ABATE CONTRL & COMPLIANCE
C RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
D BUILDINGS & FACILITIES
E SCIENTIF ACTIVS OVERSEAS
G CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
H OPRNS, RSRCH, & FACIL
J ABATE, CONT & COMP-C/0
K RSRCH & DEVELOP-C/0
N BLDGS & FACILS-C/0
R HAZ SUB RESP-REIMB
S HAZ SUB RESP-C/0
T HAZ SUB RESP TR FD
V MISC CONTRIBUTED FDS
W CONSOLID WORKING FD
X REIMBURSEMENTS
Y REVOLVING FUND
Z ALLOCATION ACCOUNTS
MEDIA CODES
A AIR
B WATER QUALITY
C DRINKING WATER
D HAZARDOUS WASTE
E PESTICIDES
F RADIATION
G NOISE
H INTERDISCIPLINARY
K GENERAL
L TOXIC SUBSTANCES
M NEW FACILITIES
N ENERGY
P REPAIRS & IMPROVEMENTS
R PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
S AGENCY MANAGEMENT
T REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
W CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
X SUPPORT CONTS
Y SUPERFUND
Z UNALLOC OMB/CONG ACTIONS
FUNCTION CODES
1 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
2 ABATEMENT & CONTROL
3 ENFORCEMENT
4 FACILITIES
5 MANAGEMENT & SUPPORT
6 SCIEN ACTIV OVERSEAS
7 U.S. REGULATORY COUNCIL
8 CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
9 HAZ SUB RESP ACTION
Z UNALLOC OMB/CONG ACTIONS
2-19
-------
3. BUDGET FORMULATION
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 3 - FORMULATING THE EPA PORTION OF THE PRESIDENT'S BUDGET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION/SUBSECTION SECTION/SUBSECTION
TITLES NUMBERS
Purpose 1
Overview 2
The Budget Formulation Process 2. a
Definitions and Key Concepts 2.b
Procedures for Formulating the EPA portion of President's Budget....3
Issuance of the Agency Operating Guidance 3.a
Preliminary/Initial Budget Formulation 3.b
Preparation of NPM's Budget Request 3.c
Internal Review and Appeals 3.d
Management Reviews 3.e
Preparation of OMB Submission 3.f
Preparation of Object Class Distribution 3.g
OMB Hearings and Passback 3.h
EPA Appeals 3. i
Preparation of President's Budget 3.j
Overview of Players and Roles 4
Assistant Administrators 4. a
Regional Administrators and their Staff 4.b
The Office of the Comptroller 4.c
Offices of Management Systems and Evaluations (OMSE) 4.d
The Administrator and Deputy Administrator 4.e
FIGURE FIGURE
TITLES NUMBERS
Process Overview 3-1
Schedule of Major Activities in the Budget Formulation Phase 3-2
Excerpt from Agency Operat ing Guidance 3-3
Example of a BUD 2 Form 3-4
Example of a BUD 1 Form 3-5
Example of a BUD 1A Form 3-6
OMB Circular A-ll Submission Requirements 3-7
Summary of Roles and Responsibilities 3-8
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 3 - FORMULATING THE EPA PORTION OF THE PRESIDENT'S BUDGET
1. PURPOSE
This Chapter describes the process for formulating EPA's portion of the
President's Budget. The first major milestone in this process is the issuance
of the Agency Operating Guidance in February. The process ends the following
January, when the President's Budget for the upcoming fiscal year is submitted
to Congress. This year-long process is referred to as the "Budget Formulation
Phase".
2. OVERVIEW
a. The Budget Formulation Process
EPA's activities during the Budget Formulation phase are focused on
preparing resource estimates and narrative justifications for the EPA portion
of the President's Budget. There are nine major steps in formulating the
level of detail of the resource estimates and narrative justifications
required in the President's Budget. Figure 3-1 depicts the major steps in the
Budget Formulation process. This overview section briefly summarizes each of
the major steps. They are described in detail in Section 3 of this Chapter.
(1) Issuance of the Agency Operating Guidance
The Agency Operating Guidance is issued in February of each year
and contains goals and strategies for the two year period of the
Operating Year and the Budget Year. The Budget Year portion of
this Guidance conveys the views of the Administrator on the
initiatives to be pursued and the issues to be addressed for the
year.
(2) Preliminary Budget Formulation
The purpose of this step is to begin to determine the amount of
resources necessary for each program to operate according to the
goals and strategies defined in the Agency Operating Guidance.
Assistant Administrators are assigned the responsibility for
planning and implementing their national programs in varying
degrees of coordination with their regional counterparts. In
this context the Assistant Administrators are called "National
Program Managers" (NPMs). The NPMs and their staffs define the
categories of activities which they expect to be funded in the
3-1
-------
Figure 3-1
OVERVIEW OF THE BUDGET FORMULATION PHASE
(D
cn
o
C
i-!
O
fD
H-
OQ
Pi
td
OP
(D
O
00
S
P>
ORGANIZATION
BUDGET FORMULATION PHASE
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEE
MAR APR
MAY
JUNE JULY AUG
SEPT
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
CONGRESS
OMB
I
NJ
EPA
K>
00 O
Ul O
i/ EPA may choose to appeal the OMB Passback. If EPA does appeal, there is a second Passback.
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
budget, the outputs generated from those activities, and the
workyears and extramural dollars required to support each
activity.
(3) NPM Budget Request
In response to a Technical Call Letter from the Office of the
Comptroller, the NPMs refine and finalize their budget requests
started in (3), above, and submit them to the Office of the
Comptroller along with a supporting narrative. The NPMs' budget
requests are due by early July to the Office of the Comptroller
where they are reviewed and compiled. Briefing papers are
prepared for the Administrator in anticipation of the internal
reviews.
(4) Internal Reviews and Appeals
In July and August a series of reviews occur between the Admin-
istrator and Deputy Administrator, the NPMs, and the Office of
the Comptroller during which the NPMs must justify their
requested level of resources to the Administrator and Deputy
Administrator. Based on the results of the internal reviews,
and decisions by the Administrator and Deputy Administrator, the
Office of the Comptroller may make changes to the NPMs1 sub-
missions and then "pass back" the changed version to the NPMs'
for review. NPMs have the option of appealing the changes to
their submissions first to the Office of the Comptroller, and to
the Administrator/Deputy Administrator. The appeals process is
complete by the end of August.
(5) Preparation of OMB Submission
The next step of the budget formulation process is to prepare
one consolidated Agency budget request to be sent to OMB. The
consolidated budget reflects changes made during the internal
reviews and includes revisions to the narratives based on the
changes. The Agency submits its Budget Request to OMB by the
middle of September.
(6) Preparation of Object Class Distribution
After the mid September submission to OMB, NPMs and Regional
Administrators continue preparation of more detailed budget
figures which, though a part of the mid September submission to
OBM, are submitted later.
3-3
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(7) OMB Hearings and Passback
After OMB receives EPA's submission, OMB holds a series of
hearings to discuss the EPA Budget Submission. The hearings are
attended by the EPA Administrator or Deputy Administrator, the
EPA Comptroller, the NPMs and office directors as appropriate.
As a result of the hearings, OMB may make changes to the EPA
submission at the Media, Program Element or activity level. OMB
"passes back" this revised EPA budget for review.
(8) Appeals
When EPA receives the OMB Passback, the Administrator decides
whether or not to appeal. If the Administrator decides to
appeal, the Agency has 48 to 72 hours to prepare the appeal and
return it to OMB. OMB may prepare a second passback, which may
again be appealed, if necessary, to the President via senior
White House officials (such as the Budget Review Board). The
Passback/Appeal process is usually completed by mid-December.
The Passback and Appeal process is characterized by extensive
negotiation, both inside EPA and between the EPA Administrator
and OMB Budget Director/OMB staff.
(9) Preparation of the President's Budget (Congressional Materials)
The purpose of this process is to incorporate the OMB Passback
decisions into EPA Budget and provide the President with a
highly structured budget request to Congress. The program
offices prepare revised narrative justifications based on the
OMB Passback and the Office of the Comptroller prepares addi-
tional justifications and descriptions in accordance with guide-
lines set forth in OMB Circular A-ll.
b. Definitions and Key Concepts
The purpose of this section is to briefly introduce key budget terms
and concepts used in the processes discussed in this chapter. (For a complete
set of definitions, see Appendix B.) The following does not include terms and
concepts already introduced in Chapter 2.
• Object classes: A uniform classification identifying the
transactions of the Federal Government by the nature of the
goods or services purchased (such as personnel compensa-
tion, supplies and materials, and equipment), without
regard to the agency involved or the purpose of the pro-
grams for which they are used. Data according to object
classification are provided in the Object Classification
3-4
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Schedule along with the corresponding Program and Financing
Schedule, in The Budget of the United States Government,
Appendix. It is at this level that obligations are made
and expenditures tracked. Object class categories include,
for example, Personnel Compensation and Benefits, Equip-
ment, Program Contracts, and Grants.
Lead Region Concept: For purposes of assuring adequate
Regional input into the budget process, EPA has developed
the Lead Region Concept in which a Deputy Regional Admin-
istrator (DRA) from one Region represents the interests of
all the Regions with respect to one of the media. For
example, Region VI may be the Lead Region for water media.
The Lead DRA for Region VI would represent all regions in
planning and allocating resources for water programs.
Intramural Funds: For purposes of the budget, funds are
either intramural or extramural. Intramural funds are
those used to support staff and activities internal to EPA.
In the President's Budget, Intramural funds are associated
with Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) and are budgeted for
those activities which are carried out or monitored by EPA
employees. In the Operating Plan, Intramural funds are ex-
pressed in dollars, and are budgeted for all object classes
internal to EPA, such as personnel, travel and equipment.
Extramural Funds: For purposes of the budget, extramural
funds are those budgeted for personnel and activities
external to EPA. In the President's Budget the Extramural
funds are budgeted for activities to be performed by con-
tractors or other government agencies—activities such as
Remedial Design and Planned Removal. In the Operating
Plan, Extramural funds are budgeted for the following
Object Classes: Interagency agreements, Program Contracts,
R&D contracts and grants, and Grants to States and local
Governments.
Full Time Equivalent (FTE): One FTE is the number of regu-
larly scheduled hours worked by one full-time employee for
one year. Appendix D in OMB Circular A-ll describes
full-time equivalent employment ceilings as the following:
Full-time equivalent (FTE) employment is defined, in all
cases, as being the total number of hours (worked or to be
worked) divided by the number of compensable hours appli-
cable to each fiscal year. For a year of 260 compensable
days, the divisor is 2,080; for 261 days, 2,088; and for
262 days, 2,096. This calculation standardizes the FTE
3-5
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
workyear for purposes of ceiling setting so that the
resulting FTE figure will be consistently measured by the
Office of Personnel Management reporting mechanism —
Standard Form 113G — using 2,080 hours each year. The
following list of compensable days for fiscal years 1980
through 2000 should be used to compute FTE employment.
COMPENSABLE DAYS PER FISCAL YEAR
Fiscal years 1980-2000
(Fiscal Year = October 1 - September 30)
1980* 262
1981 261
1982 261
1983 261
1984* 260
1985 261
1986 261
1987 261
1988* 262
1989 260
1990 260
1991 261
1992* 262
1993 261
1994 261
1995 260
1996* 261
1997 261
1998 261
1999 261
2000 261
* Leap years; February 29 occurs during these fiscal years.
The Intramural portion of the budget is developed by
determining the number of FTEs required to carry out
activities. During the budget development process FTEs are
translated into dollars by multiplying them by a pre-
determined dollar factor. FTEs may be expressed in terms
of PFTEs (Permanent Full Time Equivalents) and OPFTEs
(Other Than Permanent Full Time Equivalents).
PFTEs are employees who work a full time schedule
(eighty hours a pay period) and are permanent. They
3-6
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
include competitive service career and career condi-
tional appointments, excepted service appointments,
and commissioned corps officers.
OPFTEs are employees hired under: a) part time per-
manent appointments (b) part time temporary or indefi-
nite appointments (c) full time temporary or indefi-
nite appointments, and (d) intermittent appointments.
Employees on loan to or from the Federal government fall
under the jurisdiction of the Intergovernmental Personnel
Act and therefore are called IPAs. There are three
categories of IPAs which determine whether the IPAs are
counted toward EPA's (or any other Federal Agency's) FTE
ceil ing.
Employees on loan to EPA from state and local
government or from private enterprise are not counted
towards EPA's FTE ceiling.
Employees on loan to state and local government or to
private enterprise from EPA are not counted towards
EPA's FTE ceiling if the receiving employer pays 50%
or more of the LPA's compensation.
Employees on loan to state and local government or to
private enterprise from EPA are counted towards EPA's
FTE ceiling if the receiving employer pays less than
50% of the IPAs compensation.
• Allowance Holder: An Allowance Holder manages and imple-
ments a subset of the Agency's allotted funds called an
"Allowance". The Allowance Holder is responsible for
managing the funds and workyears and for reporting on the
status of the Allowance and the program which is funded by
the Allowance. The Allowance Holder must stay within an
FTE ceiling and within the monetary limitations of the
Allowance. The Deputy Administrator, Regional Administra-
tors and Assistant Administrators are all Allowance
Holders, as are approximately 20 other EPA managers.
3. PROCEDURES FOR FORMULATING THE EPA PORTION OF THE PRESIDENT'S BUDGET
The purpose of this section is to describe in detail the ten major steps
which comprise the Budget Formulation Phase. Figure 3-2 illustrates the pro-
cesses on a time line.
3-7
-------
Figure 3-2
SCHEDULE OF MAJOR ACTIVITIES IN THE BUDGET FORMULATION PHASE
I
oo
1. Issuance of Agency Operating
Guidance - Prepared by OMSE
(Section 3.3.b)
2. Preliminary Budget Formulation
(Section 3.3.c)
3. Preparation of NPM Budget Request
(Section 3.3.d)
4. EPA Reviews, Passback, and
Appeals (Section 3.3.e)
5. Preparation of OMB Budget
Submission (Section 3.3.f)
6. Preparation of Object Class
Distribution (Section 3.3.g)
7. OMB Hearings, Passback, and
Appeals (Section 3.3.h, 3.3.1)
8. Preparation of the President's
Budget (Section 3.3.J)
OCT
A
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MARCH
GUIDANCE
L_-^
A
APRIL
J
A
MAY
/-
JUNE
CALL
LETTER |
{
JULY
BUDGET
ESIIKATE
"^
I
A
AUG
> 1
BUDGET
REQUESTS
— ^^
INT
/.MS.
/ 4
INSTRUCTIONS .
/*
CALL
LETTER
SEPT j
i
i
i
i
i
i
j
i
i
i
RNAL 1 1
BACK 1 j
1
OCT
1 °W 1
/ SUBHISSIOIlJ
i
\ 4
KEY:
A" Initiation of Process
A » Termination of Process
NOV
o.c. 1
DISTRIBUTION |
A
/
DEC
OHB 1
MSSBACIC 1
4
A
CALL
^>
JAN
J
FEB
• PRESIDENT
BUDGET
„ X-
A.
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
d
to
i— 10
— -P-
OO O
<*n O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
a. Issuance of the Agency Operating Guidance (February)
(1) Description
The first major milestone in the Budget Formulation Phase is the
issuance of the Agency Operating Guidance in February. The Guidance contains
goals and strategies for the two year period in to the Budget Year. One por-
tion of the Guidance contains the views and priorities of the Administrator
and Deputy Administrator, and presents a set of key objectives to be achieved
by each organization in the Budget and Operating Years. This portion is used
by the NPMs to focus their budget requests on the most important environmental
issues.
The Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE) coordi-
nates the development of the Guidance on behalf of the Administrator and
Deputy Administrator. The Agency Operating Guidance is made up of two major
sections:
• The first section includes the Administrator's Over-
view, which articulates the Agency's general approach
to resolving problems and includes items such as,
"Strive for Excellence" and "Strengthen Partnership
with the States". Also included in the first section
is the "Deputy Administrator's Operating Guidance".
The Deputy Administrator's Operating Guidance empha-
sizes the particular program activities that are
expected to require the major portion of EPA's
resources over the next two years. Examples of the
goals set in this part of the Agency Guidance include
"developing effective RCRA compliance programs" and
"promoting consistent policies and regulations to
protect groundwater." Also included in this first
section of the Agency Operating Guidance is a list of
numbered Agency priorities (in the Agency Operating
Guidance for FY 85-86 there were 31 activities
listed), and an Appendix including the standards of
measurement for each type of activity. See Figure 3-3
for excerpts from the Agency Guidance.
• The second part of the Agency Operating Guidance is
comprised of program-specific operating guidance which
includes goals and strategies for the Office of Air
and Radiation, the Office of Water, the Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, the Office of
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Office of External
Affairs and Office of Research and Development. These
goals and strategies are established by the Assistant
Administrators, with the active participation of the
Regional Administrators, submitted to OMSE in final
3-9
-------
Figure 3-3
EXCERPT FROM
AGENCY OPERATING GUIDANCE
FY 1985-1986
LO
I
10.
PRIORITY LIST
1.
2.
3.
Stabilize imminent threats at uncontrolled hazardous waste
sites through Superfund removal actions.
11.
Use the Superfund remedial program to complete longer term
complex site cleanups through fund financed actions.
Conduct special reviews of pesticides suspected of causing
adverse health and environmental effects and initiate cancel-
lation and suspension actions as appropriate.
12.
Take enforcement actions to reduce the number of RCRA Class I
violations by major hazardous waste handlers and enforce
compliance with issued permits, paying special attention to
ground water monitoring, closure, and post closure requirements.
4. Issue Part B RCRA permits, giving greatest priority to those
Protect the wetlands through vigorous attention to sec.
reviews.
404
13.
* P
facilities where th<
risks.
Develop and implement air toxics monitoring and control
strategies. Specifically, develop new NESHAPS and provide
States with technical support in areas such as ambient
monitoring, stack tests, and specific chemical risk assessment.
,ere are the greatest potential environmental 14 implement the dioxin strategy developed in FY 1984.
5. Implement an acid deposition strategy.
6. Implement the ground water strategy in coordination with EPA
programs with ground water responsibilities. Assist State
ground water programs, improve the ground water data base,
and work closely with other Federal agencies.
7. Reissue NPDES permits expeditiously. Apply the new treatment
requirements contained in the revised effluent guidelines and,
where necessary, water quality based limits beyond BAT. In
conjunction with this, develop and implement water toxics
monitoring and control strategies addressing toxics in both
surface water and sediment.
8.
Negotiate responsible party cleanup at Superfund enforcement-
lead sites and pursue cost recovery actions for sites cleaned
up with Federal funds.
Under the TSCA existing chemicals program,
the most significant
initiate and
promulgate regulatory actionsTo
risks. In particular, address hazards from asbestos by
strengthening the asbestos in schools program and promulgating
and enforcing other regulations to address commercial manu-
facture, use of asbestos products, and exposures to asbestos
in public buildings or ambient air (under CAA) as necessary.
Promulgate Phase I (VOC) of the drinking water standards.
Expand the program of issuing health advisoriesfor
unregulated contaminants in support of Superfund cleanup
activities. State agencies' responses to contamination
incidents, and other purposes.
15. Promulgate RCRA regulations and take other actions to
strengthen the existing RCRA program and anticipate RCRA
reauthorization requirements. In particular, address alter-
natives to land disposal for hazardous wastes, high priority
waste handlers, and materials not covered under existing
regulations.
16. Improve compliance of all major NPDES facilities and implement
the municipal strategy to assure the construction and effective
operation of municipal facilities.
17. Manage the construction grants program to ensure that
resources are directed to projects with the greatest water
quality benefit.
18. Complete the review and revision of NAAQS as necessary
and support development of corresponding State control
plans. Monitor implementation of revised SIP schedules for
attainment of primary lead, particulate matter, ozone.
Sulfur dioxide NOX and CO NAAQS in nonattainment areas.
19. Work with States to incorporate nonpoint source control
measures in their water quality programs, where nonpoint
source pollution is a major problem, and assure provision
of technical assistance from the Department of Agriculture.
20. Ensure the Federal Government shows leadership in environ-
mental control practices through Federal facility compliance
with air, water, toxics, and hazardous waste requirements.
21. Increase development of high priority NSPS, proposing
and promulgating more standards than in FY 84.
[The above is an excerpt.]
03
O
c
n
ID
hd
M
PS
TO
bd
a
TO
n>
rt
H-
3
TO
3
03
3
OO O
t_n o
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
form by early February, and are reflected throughout the
accountability process in subsequent documents and tracking
systems. To the extent possible, the Regions and
Headquarters solicit comments and advice from the States as
they develop the guidance.
(2) Process for Developing the Guidance
The process by which the Agency develops the Agency Operating
Guidance consists of twelve major steps. The Office of Management Systems and
Evaluation (OMSE) takes the lead in coordinating the development of the Guid-
ance. While the Guidance is issued in February, preparation of the manual
begins the previous October. The following narrative describes the sequence
of steps:
(a) In October, OMSE develops a draft list of priorities
developed from regional environmental management
reports which describe each Region's most significant
environmental problems and Headquarters actions needed
to address them. The draft list is distributed for
review to Assistant Administrators, Regional Admin-
istrators, outside environmental groups and others.
(b) At the end of October, the Deputy Administrator issues
the final Agency Priority list and detailed instruc-
tions to the Assistant Administrators on the items
that should be addressed in the Agency Operating
Guidance. These instructions include broad strategic
goals that havealready been articulated by the Admin-
istrator and Deputy Administrator.
(c) During November and December, Headquarters program
managers work with the lead Regions to draft their
guidance and performance measures.
(d) In December, Assistant Administrators submit their
draft guidance documents to OMSE and the Regions for
comment. The Regions share them with appropriate
State officials for comment.
(e) Agency-wide Review occurs in late December when OMSE
consolidates the drafts produced in step (c), and
circulates this package to the Administrator, the
Deputy Administrator, the Assistant Administrator's
and the Regional Administrators for comment. Regional
Administrators discuss the Guidance drafts with the
states.
3-11
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(f) In January, based on the Assistant Administrators'
draft submissions, OMSE prepares a draft of the
section of the Agency Operating Guidance that sets
forth the Administrator's overview and the Deputy
Administrator's operating guidance. These sections
generally address approaches and objectives which cut
across the Agency and require several programs to
integrate their efforts, and may also highlight
activities specific to individual programs.
(g) In January, the reviewers (the Administrator, Deputy
Administrator, Assistant Administrators, Associate
Administrators, and Regional Administrators) send
their comments to the appropriate Assistant Adminis-
trators and to OMSE.
(h) The Assistant Administrators revise their draft guid-
ance, taking into consideration the comments they
receive, and transmit their final drafts to OMSE in
early February.
(i) The Deputy Administrator and Administrator review the
guidance documents, and ask the AAs to make final
changes.
(j) At the same time, the Administrator finalizes his
statement for the Agency Operating Guidance.
(k) The Guidance is printed in final form and distributed
to Headquarters and Regional Offices soon after the
President's Budget is released — no later than March
1st.
(1) Regional staff transmit the Guidance to State
officials.
b. Preliminary/Initial Budget Formulation (Late March-June)
The purpose of this process is to estimate the amount of resources
necessary to operate specific programs in the Budget Year. The process is
initiated by the NPMs during April (before the Office of the Comptroller
issues its Technical Call Letter containing budget targets and guidelines).
To the extent possible, the budget year guidance contained in the Agency's two
year operating guidance provides a starting point for identifying the activi-
ties and accomplishments to be included in the budget. Although the process
may vary somewhat from year to year, it typically consists of determining:
• The categories of activities/accomplishments to be used in
the budget;
3-12
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• The number of outputs (actions) to be accomplished for spe-
cified categories;
• The number of Headquarters and Regional FTEs required to
carry out and/or monitor each activity; and
• The amount of extramural dollars required to carry out each
activity.
An optional step in the process may also include the identification and/or
further development of Budget Year issues to be addressed. In April, senior
EPA managers may hold a series of meetings to discuss program emphases, new
program starts or cutbacks, issues to be addressed in the Budget Year and
guidelines to the Budget Year based on current Congressional Actions. During
these meetings, the Administrator and Deputy Administrator communicate to the
Assistant Administrators, the Regional Administrators and the Office of the
Comptroller the targets or directions for EPA, set by the President.
In late May or early June, the Office of the Comptroller issues the
Technical Call Letter for the purpose of providing the NPMs and their staff
with targets on which to base their formal budget request, and of supplying
the NPMs with instructions and sample formats for preparing the request.
The contents of the Call Letter may vary somewhat from year to year;
however, in general it will include:
• A cover memorandum summarizing the Office of the Comp-
troller's Technical Call Letter and highlighting salient
points;
• The schedule for the budget process, including the Budget
Request due date, the Administrator's hearing schedule and
OMB submission date;
• The final resource targets based on last year's budget and
guidelines for calculating two or three incremental (or
decremental) levels. For example, what activities will be
omitted if the budget is only 90% of what is requested?
What activities could be accomplished if 110% of the budget
is appropriated?
• An indication of the material which should be included in
the final Budget Request package, including blank forms,
instructions and sample formats.
• Other information specific to the Budget Request for that
year, including identification of Lead Regions and Lead
Deputy Regional Administrators.
3-13
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
c. Preparation of NPM's Budget Request (Mid-June Through Mid July)
In early July, the NPMs develop Budget Requests for their media for
submission to the Office of the Comptroller and Administrator. In general,
the process consists of refining/finalizing the initial budget estimates,
developing incremental budget levels; composing a preliminary narrative to
support the Budget Request, and writing a Budget Request Transmittal letter.
(1) Preparing Budget Forms
All NPMs must prepare or refine dollar and workyear resource
estimates for both Headquarters and Regions for each program element in their
media, and dollar estimates for intramural and extramural object classes
within the program elements. The NPM estimates of resources are based on
several factors. The two most critical factors are: the resources which are
currently allocated (e.g., in the Current Year and Operating Year) to the
program elements and object classes; and the Agency Operating Guidance which
sets future priorities for each program element. Combining the two, NPMs are
able to determine if a program should gain or lose resources from previous
years. The estimate of resources must be completed and submitted to the
Office of the Comptroller by early July. Standard Agency forms are used to
transmit the resource request and justifications:
• The BOD 2 Forms depict every activity the Agency
expects to perform in the Current Year under each pro-
gram. For each activity, a set of performance mea-
sures is defined, and for each measure, commitments
are made based on the workyears requested. The
hundreds of BUD 2 Forms in the budget request to OMB,
represent a comprehensive functional analysis that
accounts for 100% of the resources requested by the
Agency. A modified BUD 2 Form ultimately becomes a
part of the Budget Request. In general, there is one
BUD 2 Form per program element; however, program
elements with both Headquarters and Regional compo-
nents use separate forms for the Headquarters and
Regions. Three years are included on each BUD 2 Form:
The Current Year Resources - This portion of the
Bud 2 Form contains the current year data and is
used as a comparison when calculating Budget Year
figures.
The Operating Year Request - This portion of the
BUD 2 Form is completed with the figures from the
President's Budget. It is used as a basis for
comparison when calculating the Budget Year
figures.
3-14
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Budget Year Proposal - This is the blank portion
of the BUD 2 Form and is used by the NPMs to
request dollars and FTEs for the Budget Year.
Space for the following items is included for each line
item activity on the BUD 2 Form:
Regional FTEs - the total number of Regional FTEs
required to accomplish the activity; or
Headquarters FTEs - the total number of
Headquarters FTEs required to accomplish the
activity; and
Extramural dollars ($) - money requested for con-
tracts, grants and lAGs under the AC&C and R&D
appropriation; and
Outputs - measurable results of performing an
activity.
During the budget formulation process, many of the BUD 2 numbers may
change, especially the outputs, as various "scenarios" are experimented with.
Figure 3-4 contains an example of a BUD 2 Form.
• The BOD 1 Form contains a summary of the workyears and
funds requested in the BUD 2 Forms along with a com-
parison of these amounts as approved in the two prior
years. The data on the BUD 1 Form contains figures
for multiple funding levels e.g., 100% of budget
request, 90% of budget request, 85% of budget request.
For each of the funding levels, the following must
occur:
Estimate the Intramural dollars needs;
Transfer the total Extramural dollars from the
BUD 2 Form;
Add the Intramural and Extramural dollars for a
total Budget Authority figure.
When these steps are complete, the increment figures
are added across to determine the Total Budget Request
by:
PFTE
OPFTE
TOTAL FTE
3-15
-------
Figure 3-4
EXAMPLE: BUD 2 FORM
•OJ
i
BUD 12 US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PROGRAM ELEMENT PRICING ANALYSIS
PE CODE _ HO BT_ PE TITLE
RESPONSIBLE OFFICE
DOLLAR PRICING IS EXTRAMURAL ONLY (CONTRACTS. GRANTS AND IAG DOLLARS ONLY)
FY 1986 INCREMENTS OPTIONAL
ACTIVITIES/
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FY 1984 ; FY 1985 | LEVEL 1
OP PLAN OUT iPRES. BUDGET OUT OUT
FTE 1
$ IPUT IFTE | $ ;PUT IFTE
1
I
1
I
1
1
i
i
1
1 1
1 !
1 1
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
1 I
1 I
1
1
I
1
1
:
i i
i i
i
I
i
1
i
I
1 1
1 I
1 1 )
i i
i i
i i
1 1 1
1 I I
: i i
i i
: i :
1 !
i i
i i
: ;
i i
i i
t i
i i
i i i
i I i
i i
i I
: i :
: : i
: i i
II! 1
I 1
1 t
! 1
1 i
| |
s ;PUT
i
i
1
1
i
i i
LEVEL 2 ! LEVEL 3
OUT OUT
FTE
% IPUT IFTE I $
1
:
!
!
!
i
!
!
!
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
j
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
I
j
!
i
i
i
!
i
i
!
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
!
1
i
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
!
1
1
!
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
!
1
: i i
i i i
i i i
PUT
LEVEL 4
OUT
FTE
1
i i :
i : i i
1 III 1
1 III 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 III 1
1 II! II! !
$ IPUT
1
1
1
i
CD
W
O
c
i-i
n
ro
3
H-
3
OP
CL
W
o-
CTO
3
OQ
I
CO O
Oi O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Intramural dollars
Extramural dollars
Total dollars
Figure 3-5 contains a copy of a BUD 1 Form.
The BUD 1A Form contains extensive narrative justifi-
cations for each level of funding requested by EPA for
each program. It contains the programs, goals and
objectives, a description of current operations, ex-
pected accomplishments and an explanation of the
changes from the prior year's budget. One BUD la Form
is prepared for each program element; two are prepared
for those program elements which have Headquarters and
Regional components. Somewhat modified versions of
the narrative are included in the Agency's OMB Budget
Submission.
The following information is required to complete the
BUD 1A Form for each Program Element:
Goals, Objectives and Regulatory Requirements -
references the statute which authorizes the
activities undertaken by the particular Program
Element, the primary goal of the program, and the
major objectives supporting the goal.
Current Operations - a description of current
fiscal year activities carried out in support of
the Program Element's objectives, including the
nature of the work and who is performing the
work.
Program Element Description and Expected Accom-
plishments - the lowest level of control in the
EPA budget structure is the program element. The
BUD 1A Form summarizes the amount of money and,
in some cases, the number of FTEs being requested
in the budget proposal. It also describes the
activities expected to be accomplished in the
Budget Year. This section should be made as
specific as possible since it, more than the
others, serves as the justification of the budget
request.
For those elements with incremental funding
levels, this section should be repeated for each
3-17
-------
Figure 3-5
EXAMPLE: BUD 1 FORM
en
o
n
n
rt>
I
H-
00
01
3
a.
W
CL
OQ
(D
BUD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCV
PROGRAM ELEMENT ANALYSIS
PE CODEJ HO:
RESPONSIBLE OFFICE:
1984 j
OPERATING !
PLAN !
RT:
PE TITLE:
1965 ! 1985 | 1986
OPERATING !SUPPLEMENTALj REQUEST
PLAN | j
i CHANGE FROM 1985
! OPERATING PLAN
|(INC. SUPPLEMENTAL)
1
I—'
oo
PERSONNEL
TOTAL FTE
BUDGET AUTHORITV
INTRAMURAL
EXTRAMURAL
TOTAL
•••»• FVBd BUDGET PROCESS - BUD-1 (OUTPUT DOCUMENT DISPLAYING EPA'S BUDGET SUBMISSION •••••
SENT TO OMB W/NARRATIVES)
0?
o
c
01
ho
t-" N3
•*>. -c-
oo o
l-n O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
level, with an indication of the additional
activities which could be completed with the
additional funds.
Explanation of Change - an explanation of the
last column of the BUD 1 Form, which is the
difference between the Budget Request and the
Operating Year Operating Plan.
Figure 3-6 contains a copy of a BUD 1A Form.
(2) ORD Process
It should be noted at this point that the Office of Research and
Development (ORD) follows a different budget development pattern because of
differences in its mission. First, although most of its work is performed at
laboratories outside of Washington, D.C., ORD is treated as a Headquarters
organization, and the Regional structure typical of the other programs is not
applicable. Second, since the rest of the Agency programs are clients of ORD,
a mechanism is needed for developing an inventory of the R&D needs of the
various programs and for pricing them. To accommodate these unique charac-
teristics, ORD has developed specialized procedures which are summarized as
follows:
• Media-oriented research committees composed of
researchers, managers, and program office representa-
tives are established to examine the research and
development needs in each program area. In March, the
research committee analyses are consolidated into
"mega-strategies" for each media category (i.e., air,
water, toxics, hazardous waste, etc.) which are re-
viewed by ORD Office and Laboratory Directors, and
submitted to media program offices for their review
and concurrence.
• In April, the Assistant Administrator for R&D develops
Budget Year target resource allocations for each pro-
gram area, based on discussions with the mega-strategy
authors and the Agency Operating Guidance. The mega-
strategy authors and the research committee chairmen
then meet and disaggregate the media-level totals to
the individual research committees within each of the
media.
• In April and early May, the research committees meet
and agree on objectives to be fulfilled within their
resource allocations. These objectives are forwarded
to the Assistant Administrator level for aggregation.
3-19
-------
Figure 3-6
EXAMPLE: BUD 1A FORM
50
fD
Cfl
O
c
1-i
O
fD
BUD 1A
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PROGRAM ELEMENT ANALYSIS
PE CODE IIAX 5A IK) X RT
PE TITLE Support Services
RESPONSIBLE OFFICE Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
COALS. OBJECTIVES AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
The purpose of tfcla program is to provide the Belsvllle and Bay St. Louis laboratories with
CURRENT OPERATIONS
09
PJ
w
cu
09
fD
rt-
H-
3
OQ
01
O
(U
PROGRAM ELEMENT LEVEL DESCRIPTION AND EXPECTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS — LEVEL 1
PROGRAM ELEMENT LEVEL DESCRIPTION AND EXPECTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS — LEVEL 2
PROGRAM ELEMENT LEVEL DESCRIPTION AND EXPECTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS — LEVEL 3
EXPLANATION OF CHANCE — 1985 TOTAL REQUEST VS. 1984 OPERATING PLAN
I—- K)
—. -1^
OO O
Ln O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• At the end of May or early June, the Assistant Admin-
istrator for Research and Development holds two days
of meetings to afford the heads of the research com-
mittees an opportunity to describe their requests.
The overview is followed by a more detailed discussion
during which ORD Office Directors represent their
respective Laboratory Directors.
• When the final resource decisions are made, ORD staff
prepare the narrative, outputs, workyear estimates,
and pricing in the formats required by the Office of
the Comptroller Budget Call Letter for submission in
early July.
d. Internal Review and Appeals (July - Early September)
When the Office of the Comptroller receives the Budget Requests from
the NPMs, three administrative tasks are done prior to the internal reviews:
• The Office of the Comptroller consolidates the NPM sub-
missions and enters each submission into the automated
Resources Management Information system (RMIS);
• After the data have been entered and edited for accuracy,
various Agency-level composite computer reports are
generated for review by the Administrator and Deputy
Administrator;
• The Office of the Comptroller reviews the NPMs1 justi-
fications and in concert with the NPMs prepares issue
papers for the Administrator and Deputy Administrator to
assist in their review of the budget. The issue papers
highlight significant resource increases and/or highly
visible initiatives.
After receiving the NPMs1 submissions and the issue papers, the
Administrator and Deputy Administrator conduct budget reviews. The reviews
consume about four to five days over a 2-week period in late July and include
program-by-program overviews followed by more specific discussions of the
resources requested for each program element. These sessions are attended by
Assistant Administrators, Office Directors, and Lead Deputy Regional Adminis-
trators .
After the reviews, the Office of the Comptroller develops a revised
set of funding recommendations, incorporating decisions made by the Adminis-
trator and Deputy Administrator during the reviews. These recommendations are
reviewed with the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator, program by
program, resulting in a list of changes which the Office of the Comptroller
incorporates in the budget for review by the Administrator, who may direct
3-21
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
further modifications. All approved changes are incorporated in the budget by
the Office of the Comptroller (this process is known as the "Markup"). Each
NPM .receives the section of the revised version of the Agency budget (the
"internal passback") pertaining to his or her area of responsibility.
Assistant Admininstrators have an opportunity to appeal their inter-
nal passbacks to the Administrator and Deputy Administrator. The appeal
decisions are incorporated by the Office of the Comptroller into the Agency
budget which is again reviewed by the Administrator and the Deputy Admin-
istrator and passed back to the NPMs. This final internal passback is
distributed to the Assistant Administrators at the end of August to enable
them to complete their preparation of the narrative and tabular material for
the President's Budget by the first week of September. The Office of the
Comptroller reviews the narratives, negotiates changes with each program
office for clarity and consistency, and prepares them in final form. All
changes to the tabular material are entered into the RMIS for final edits and
production of final tables.
e. Management Reviews
As part of the budget formulation process, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) conducts Management Reviews to determine the general status
of major management initiatives at the agency and to identify and agree upon
the management improvements each agency will undertake. The reviews are held
in the last quarter of the current fiscal year with the intent of agreeing
upon management improvement commitments to include in the September budget
submission.
The Management Review process begins with data calls requesting
general and agency-specific information and analyses. The analyses focus on
management initiative descriptions and costs, administrative operations and
staffing, and information processing. The review itself is conducted by the
Management side of OMB, and the OMB Budget Division actively participates.
Senior managers from the EPA Office of Administration and Resources Management
participate in a discussion of agency management improvements. During the
review, OMB may request additional information and analyses. Agency
representatives work in small groups with OMB counterparts to discuss the
issues in further detail and to clarify them. After evaluation of the
initiatives, OMB provides policy guidance, either through the budget passback
or separate letter, to convey its management improvement objectives for the
agency, including those management improvement initiatives that are to be
reflected in the agency's Congressional budget submission and the agency's
management improvement plan for future years. After negotiation, the agency
implements the agreed upon management improvement plan.
f. Preparation of OMB Submission (Mid August - Early September)
The culmination of the activities from February through September is
EPA's Budget Request to OMB. By the middle of September, EPA provides OMB
3-22
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
with a consolidated budget request consistent in format and style across all
media and program elements. In mid to late August the Office of the
Comptroller issues instructions to all senior budget officers (SBOs) and
Budget Analysts regarding the formatting and contents of the Budget
Submission. EPA's Budget submission to OMB contains dollar and workyear
resources for each program element. At this stage of budget formulation, the
resources are represented at a National level of detail; that is, resources
have not been allocated to individual Regions, although the split between
Headquarters resources and Regional resources has been defined. EPA's sub-
mission includes the final versions of the BUD 1, 1A and 2 Forms which reflect
the changes incorporated as a result of the internal reviews.
g. Preparation of Object Class Distribution (September)
The purpose of this activity is to further refine the budget to
include object class line items. The Office of the Comptroller issues
guidance, in the form of a Call Letter, on developing object class totals. In
addition to the Call Letter, the Office of the Comptroller distributes
computer-printed forms, one page per Program Element. The forms are
pre-printed with Object Class Categories and Codes, the amounts budgeted for
the coming fiscal year (i.e., the current Phase II Operating Plan which is
discussed in Chapter 4) by Object Class, and the OMB Budget Request.
The formal OMB Budget Request submitted by EPA in mid September
reflects the program element split (by appropriation) of each budget element;
that is two groupings of object classes - Intramural dollars, and Extramural
dollars (if applicable). Prior to the OMB hearings, the program offices must
distribute the amounts reflected in the Intramural category across the follow-
ing object classes:
• Personnel Compensation and Benefits (PC&B)
Planned obligations for salaries, wages (gross compensa-
tion), and fringe benefits for personal services rendered
to the Government by its Officers, or employees, either
civil or uniformed, and compensation for services rendered
by consultants (employed on a per diem or fee basis only).
Planned dollars for former personnel should also be
included.
• Travel and Transportation of Persons
Planned obligations for transportation of Government
employees or others, their per diem allowance while in an
authorized travel status, and other expenses incident to
travel which are to be paid by the Government either
directly or by reimbursing the traveler both for travel
away from and in and around permanent duty station and for
rentals of passenger vehicles from Government motor pools.
3-23
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Transportation of Things
Planned obligations for the transportation of things and
for care of such things while in process of being trans-
ported, including postage used in parcel post, rental of
trucks and other transportation equipment, and reimburse-
ments to Government personnel for the authorized movement
of household effects or house trailers.
Rent, Communications and Utilities
Rent — Planned obligations for the rental of land, struc-
tures or equipment (other than transportation equipment),
not agency owned. Also included are Standard Level User
Charges (SLUG) assessed by the General Services Administra-
tion for the rental of space and related services.
Communications — Planned obligations for the transmission
of messages from place to place, such as contractual
charges for land telegraph service, telephone and teletype
services; charges for postage (other than parcel post);
contractual messenger service; and rental of post office
boxes, postage meter machines, mailing machines, and tele-
type equipment.
Utilities — Planned obligations for heat, light, power,
water, gas, electricity and other utility services exclu-
sive of transportation and communication service.
Printing and Reproduction
Planned obligations for contractual printing and reproduc-
tion, and the related composition and binding operations
performed by the Government Printing Office, other agencies
or other units of the same agency (on a reimbursable
basis), and commercial printers. Includes all common pro-
cesses of duplicating and standard forms when specifically
printed or assembled to order, and printed envelopes and
letterheads.
Other Contractual Services
Planned obligations for all contractual services not other-
wise classified. Included are management and administra-
tive contracts, such as contracts for repairs and altera-
tions, subsistence and support of persons, stenographic
services, publication of notices, advertising and radio
broadcast time, tuition, fees and other charges, operation
of facilities or other service contracts.
3-24
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• Supplies and Materials
Planned obligations for commodities whether acquired by
formal contract or other form of purchase which are (a)
ordinarily consumed or expended within one year after they
are put into use, (b) converted in the process of construc-
tion or manufacture, or (c) used to form a minor part of
equipment or fixed property.
« Equipment
Planned obligations for personal property of a more or less
durable nature — that is, which may be expected to have a
period of service of one year or more after being put into
use without material impairment of its physical condition.
It includes charges for service in connection with initial
installation or reinstallation of equipment when performed
under contract.
• Land and Structures
Planned obligations for land and interest in land, build-
ings and other structures, additions to building, non-
structural improvements, and fixed equipment (whether an
addition or replacement), when acquired through purchase.
• Insurance Claims and Indemnities
Payments for claims on life and marine insurance policies.
Includes annuities paid form trust funds to former
employees in addition to imdemnities for destruction or
injury of persons or property.
The program offices must also distribute the amounts reflected in the
Extramural category across the following object classes:
• Research and Development Contracts
Contracts involving systematic study directed toward fuller
scientific knowledge or understanding of the subject
studies. This includes research or the systematic use of
knowledge gained from research, directed toward the pro-
duction of useful materials, devices, systems or methods
including design and development of prototypes and pro-
cesses. Research may include either basic or applied
research. Development also includes, but is not limited
to: quality assurance services, analysis and testing of
samples, monitoring activities that aid in the development
of new and improved sampling and analytical methods, review
3-25
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
of research documents evaluation of technical outputs,
preparation of manuals and handbooks, and conduct of
seminars and workshops. Also included are demonstration
activities that are part of research or development, i.e.,
they are intended to prove or to test whether a technology
or method works.
Interagency Agreements (IAG)
Planned obligations for contracts and agreements between
EPA and another Federal agency or agencies in which EPA
transfers funds to the agency or agencies. Specifically
excludes payments made to other agencies for services of
civilian and military personnel on reimbursable detail.
Distinction between this and other Agency personnel working
under an IAG also excludes charges for contractual services
in connection with the operation of health facilities.
Program Contracts
Planned obligations for contracts which support program
operations. Included in this category are contracts for
the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements, for the
development of regulations, standards, guidelines and cri-
teria, for monitoring, for surveillance and analysis, for
pesticides certification, for regional laboratory analysis,
and for special studies and analyses of programs. Manage-
ment, administrative and research contracts are not
included in this category.
ADP Contract Services
Planned obligations for contracts to provide computer sys-
tem time and related services, system analysis design and
programming services, repair and maintenance of data pro-
cessing equipment, ADP/telecommunication services such as
keypunching/verifying, ADP studies, advice on ADP acquisi-
tion, ADP library services and consulting services not
otherwise reported. Includes payment for direct ADP costs
only. ADP costs within program or research and development
contracts should be charged to FMS object classes 25.32
(R&D Contracts) and 25.35 (Program Contracts).
Research Grants
Planned obligations for awards to governmental and non-
governmental organizations and individuals in support of
3-26
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
environmental pollution.
• Demonstration Grants
Planned obligations for awards to governmental and non-
governmental organizations and individuals in support of
projects designed to demonstrate new or improved techniques
to enhance environmental control.
• Grants to State, Interstate, and Local Governments (Program
Grants)
Planned obligations for awards to State, interstate, or
local government agencies to aid them in the planning,
management, development, or implementation of environmental
pollution programs.
• Other Grants (Fellowships, Training)
Training Grants — Planned obligations for awards to State
and local government agencies and to educational institu-
tions for the purpose of developing and conducting training
programs for the education of personnel in the field of
abatement and control of environmental pollution.
Fellowships — Planned obligations for awards to educa-
tional institutions for the academic training of specified
environmental pollution.
h. OMB Hearings and Passback (October, November, December)
After OMB has received the EPA submission and reviewed it, OMB
examiners conduct hearings with EPA officials over a 5-to 6-day period around
the first week of October. The hearings include an overview session with the
Deputy Administrator, Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources
Management (OARM) and the Office of the Comptroller, plus separate hearings
with each programmatic Assistant Administrator and staff, focusing on the
detailed substance of each program. In addition, during their review of the
submission, OMB analysts have frequent followup discussions with EPA staff.
Based on the hearings, followup discussions, and review of backup material,
the OMB analysts develop programmatic and budgetary recommendations concerning
the Agency's budget which they present to the Director of OMB in early
November.
A major milestone in late November is the issuance by OMB of the
changes in the EPA budget resulting from its review; this is called the OMB
Passback. The Passback is sent to the Agency in the form of hardcopy and a
computer tape for input to the RMIS. The Passback consists of an overview
section showing the revised program element totals, along with supporting
3-27
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
computer tape for input to the RMIS. The Passback consists of an overview
section showing the revised program element totals, along with supporting
data. These revised totals are expressed in terms of workyears and dollars
requested versus the amounts approved by OMB; the OMB changes are explained in
footnotes. Although the EPA submission to OMB contained proposed allocations
for each program element and object class, the OMB Passback data usually
contain only program element totals with a PC&B floor and travel ceiling.
i. EPA Appeals (November, December)
When EPA receives the November OMB Passback, the Office of the
Comptroller enters the computerized data into the RMIS, analyzes the changes,
and provides copies to the Administrator and Deputy Administrator. An
immediate decision is needed from Che Administrator on whether to appeal the
OMB Passback and, if so, at what funding level the appeal should be focused.
The Office of the Comptroller assists the Administrator in preparing the
Appeal document and submitting it to OMB. Based on analysis of the Passback,
the Office of the Comptroller develops budget issues, prepares briefings, and
conducts discussions for the Administrator. The Appeal must be forwarded to
OMB within 48 to 72 hours after the Passback is issued.
OMB reviews the Agency's Appeal and negotiates with EPA officials on
points at issue. The result of this process is a second OMB Passback in
December, which can also be appealed. Ultimately, any critical issues that
cannot be resolved may be appealed to the Presidential level (e.g., Budget
Review Board) by the EPA Administrator. When all issues are decided and a
final Passback is received from OMB, the Office of the Comptroller updates the
RMIS, and the EPA portion of the President's submission is final.
j. Preparation of the President's Budget—Congressional Materials
(December, January)
The purpose of this activity is to incorporate the final budget
decisions on the Administrator's request into the EPA portion of the
President's Budget Request. When EPA and OMB have completed negotiations on
the EPA budget submission, EPA prepares additional backup information for the
President to submit to Congress in January. The backup information spelled
out in OMB Circular A-ll includes special analyses and narrative information.
An excerpt from Circular A-ll is included in Figure 3-7 which lists the
requirements for submission of the President's Budget.
This material is voluminous and much of it must be submitted to the
Office of the Comptroller by the end of September, although some items such as
outlay projections may be held until October or November, when the accounting
data for the prior fiscal year become available. The statistical information
for these special exhibits requires cross-cuts in different patterns and
aggregations from those used for the main budget document. In some cases, an
3-28
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Figure 3-7
OMB Circular A-11
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Initial Submission
Summary and highlight statement
Budget justifications
Information on rental payments to GSA*
Statement of personnel resources*
Data on research and development
Computer Materials
Supplementary source data
Multi-year planning estimates
Current services estimates
Receipts estimates
Print Materials and Related Information
Appropriation language sheet
Program and financing schedule
Schedules on status of direct loans and guaranteed loans
Schedule of object classification
Personnel summary
Supporting schedules of object classification and personnel summary for
allocations
Narrative statement on program and performance
Statement of revenue and expense
Statement of financial condition
Schedule on status of unfunded contract authority
Schedule of amounts available for appropriation
Summary of budget authority and outlays
Detail of permanent positions*
Additional Materials
Data on deposit funds
Data on acquisition, operation, and use of information technology systems
Data on agency borrowing and investment
Data on debt collection activities^
This information will be submitted only when specifically requested by OMB.
2
To be submitted no later than December 1.
3-29
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
initial set of tables must be submitted in September or early October, an
updated set forwarded late in November after OMB issues the Passback, and a
final update when the budget is completed in late December.
In addition to the standard A-ll materials, the Agency is often
requested to submit special documentation, backup material and computer runs.
One example is a lengthy computer report presenting all the budget data by
object class within each program element. This report expands each of the
program elements into three to ten categories such as personnel compensation
and benefits (PC&B), travel, transportation, rent, ADP contracts, and grants.
Because of the volume of data, the preparation of this material continues from
the beginning of the budget formulation phase through the time it must be in
final form in December.
In January, the Program offices revise their budget submissions to
reflect the Passback and the formatting requirements of the President's
Budget. The Office of the Comptroller then assembles the materials required
for the EPA portion of President's Budget. The materials include the A-ll
documentation, the special computer runs and the detailed funding requests.
The Office of the Comptroller arranges for the printing of the EPA portion of
the President's Budget which will be distributed to the Appropriations Com-
mittees at the same time that the President submits his budget to Congress.
Since the Budget is public information, as many as 600-650 copies will be
printed for distribution to interested parties.
Pursuant to OMB Circular A-10 and The Budget and Accounting Act of
1921 (31 U.S.C. 1108(e)) until the President submits his Budget to Congress
the budget data are highly confidential. Once the President has submitted his
Budget, the office of the Comptroller prepares various public documents such
as a "Summary of the Budget" booklet, a press release and a special presenta-
tion of budget data for the press. An EPA sponsored press conference is also
held, with the Administrator or other official explaining the major elements
of the proposed budget and responding to questions.
4. OVERVIEW OF PLAYERS AND THEIR ROLES
The following is a brief overview of the roles of the key players in the
Budget Formulation Phase. For convenience, Figure 3-8 summarizes the roles of
the key players.
a. Assistant Administrators and Their Subordinate Managers and Staff
During the Budget Formulation Phase, each Assistant Administrator
(AA) takes the role of a National Program Manager (NPM). NPMs have primary
responsibility for planning and estimating the workyear and dollar resources
for their specific media for both Headquarters and Regional offices. This
process includes determining the Headquarters/Regional resource split and the
preparation of the narratives which will be used as justification to OMB and
Congress for the requested resource level.
3-30
-------
u>
OJ
Figure 3-8
SUMMARY OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Assistant Administrators as National
Program Managers
(Their program managers and Senior
Budget Officers)
Regional Administrators
(Their subordinate Managers and
Staff)
Office of the Comptroller
Office of Management Systems
and Evaluation (OMSE)
Administrator and Deputy
Administrator
• Develop Agency Operating Guidance
• Prepare Budget Request for Office of the Comptroller
• Defending the Agency Request to OMB
• Help develop Regional resource requests
• Review NPM's draft budget to assure Regional concerns are met
• Lead DRA represents all Regions for one media
• Initiate Budget Formulation Process by issuing Call Letter
• Review Budget Data as it is submitted from NPMs; Negotiate Changes
• Prepare issue and Briefing Papers for Administrator and Deputy Administrator Review
• Manage the Resources Management Information System; assures data is input:
- from the NPM submission to the Office of the Comptroller
from the EPA submission to OMB
from the OMB Passback
from the President's Budget totals
• Prepare "Summary of the Budget," Press Conference Materials
• Prepare A-ll materials for Congress
• Issue the Agency Guidance
• Provide Agency Direction and Priorities
• Review NPM Budget submission during internal briefings
• Defend the Agency Budget to OMB
• Appeal Decisions
• Conduct press conference highlighting salient issues in EPA's portion of the President's
Budget
n>
en
o
n
n
(D
CB
3
3
H-
OQ
00
n>
3
cro
3
NO
00 O
Ln O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
In their roles as NPMs, the Assistant Administrators have the
following major categories of responsibilities in the Budget Formulation
Phase:
• Helping Prepare Agency Operating Guidance
The Agency Operating Guidance, which covers both the Budget
Year and the Operating Year, is published each February.
The Assistant Administrators formulate the Guidance for
their specific programs by reviewing Agency priorities for
their media and developing a set of measures and priority
activities for their media.
• Preparing Their Submission for the Office of the
Comptroller
NPMs have primary responsibility for preparing resource
level estimates for their media. The estimates are based
on last year resource levels, policy directions articulated
in the Agency Operating Guidance and on input from the
Regional offices. When these data are compiled and put in
standard format, the NPM submits the resource request to
the Office of the Comptroller by July. The NPMs partic-
ipate in a series of internal briefings with the Admin-
istrator and Deputy Administrator to justify the requested
resource levels and, based on the decisions in the
hearings, the NPMs modify their budget request and update
their narrative justification for submission to OMB.
• Defending the Agency Request to OMB
After the Agency submits the budget to OMB, NPMs must be
prepared to justify the detailed substance of their program
not only at the OMB hearings but also during any follow-up
discussions with OMB officials. If the Agency decides to
appeal any changes that OMB might have made to the budget,
the NPMs develop their portions of the formal EPA Appeal.
In performing their responsibilities, the National Program Managers
typically rely heavily on assistance from their Senior Budget Officers (SBOs).
In some case NPMs rely on the SBOs to take the lead in preparing the budget
materials, subject to NPM review and approval. Additionally, in almost all
cases, NPMs call on their program managers (e.g., Office Directors) to help
prepare materials and participate in the decision-making processes that are a
part of each NPM's responsibilities.
b. Regional Administrators and Their Subordinate Managers and Staff
The extent of Regional involvement during the Budget Formulation
3-32
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Phase varies, in large part based on the NPMs' willingness to involve them in
the process and the DRA's commitment to be involved in the process. Senior
EPA management has developed the Lead Region concept, in which a Deputy
Regional Administrator (DRA) from one Region represents the interests of all
the Regions with respect to one of the media. The Lead DRA should involve the
other regions. During the Budget Formulation Phase the Lead Regions are
heavily involved in reviewing the NPM's draft budget prior to its submission
to the Office of the Comptroller.
c. The Office of The Comptroller
The Office of the Comptroller (OC) is the control center for the
budget cycle. This office initiates and coordinates each step of the process
by a letter or memo which explains the next step and provides data that may be
needed by the program offices to perform the next step. These letters or
memos are called Call Letters and officially mark the beginning of a budget
process or activity. The Office of the Comptroller develops issue analyses
for the Administrator or a Deputy Administrator based on the NPM budget
submission; they organize the internal reviews and are the clearing point for
changes and appeals to budget request. No data or information should be
submitted to OMB or Congressional Committees on budget resources without the
prior review by the Office of the Comptroller. This is to ensure that the
responses reflect Agency-wide and Administration policies and that the
responses are helpful and consistent.
Another responsibility of the Office of the Comptroller is the
management of the Resources Management Information system (RMIS). After every
iteration of the budget process, the changes or new level of detail are input
to RMIS for report retrieval and manipulation. This occurs four times during
the budget formulation phase: the NPM submission to the Office of ±he
Comptroller, the OMB submission, the OMB Passback, and the President's Budget
totals.
At the very end of the Budget Formulation Phase, immediately
after the President has submitted his budget to Congress, the Office of the
Comptroller publishes a document called, "Summary of the Budget" for public
distribution. In addition, the Office of the Comptroller prepares the
material for the Administrator's Press Conference which highlights the salient
points of the EPA portion of the President's submission to Congress.
d. The Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE)
The Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE) is
responsible for coordinating the development of the Agency Operating Guidance.
e. The Administrator and Deputy Administrator
The Administrator and the Deputy Administrator play a key role
in directing the formulation of the budget. It is in this phase of the budget
3-33
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
process that the Administrator and Deputy Administrator define new directions
or policies for the Agency. These new directions or policies are articulated
in the Agency Operating Guidance. Because the NPMs base their budget requests
on the guidelines set in the Agency Operating Guidance, the formulation of the
budget becomes a reflection of the policies and priorities of the Administra-
tor and the Deputy Administrator. The four most critical points in the pro-
cess where the Administrator or Deputy Administrator exert their influence
are:
• In the internal reviews at EPA;
• In the OMB hearings;
• In deciding whether or not to appeal the OMB Passback;
and,
• At the end of the Budget Formulation phase, when the
Administrator or a designee must preside at a press
conference to discuss the highlights of EPA's portion
of the President's Budget.
3-34
-------
4. BUDGET REVIEW
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 4 - PLANNING AND BUDGETING FOR THE OPERATING YEAR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION/SUBSECTION SECTION/SUBSECTION
TITLES NUMBERS
Purpose 1
Overview 2
The Planning Process 2.a
Definitions and Key Concepts 2.b
Procedures for Developing the Agency Operating Plan 3
EPA interacts with Congress 3.a
OMSE Issues New Agency Operating Guidance 3.b
NPMs Prepare Phase I Plans (late March) 3.c
Regions and NPMs Prepare Initial Allocation
of Workyear Targets by Region 3.d
Regions and Headquarters prepare Phase II
Operating Plans 3.e
Agency Managers Define Performance Objectives
and Commitments 3. f
EPA continues to interact with Congress 3.g
Development of the Phase III Operating Plan
(Quarterly Spread) 3.h
Apportionment Request 3. i
Overview of Players and Roles 4
Assistant Administrators and Their Staff 4.a
Regional Administrators and Their Staff 4.b
Office of the Comptroller 4.c
Office of Management Systems and Evaluation
(OMSE) 4.d
Administrator and Deputy Administrator 4.e
FIGURE FIGURE
TITLES NUMBERS
Overview of the Budget Review Phase 4-1
Schedule of Major Activies in the
Budget Review Phase 4-2
Example of a Workload Model Design 4-3
Summary of Roles and Responsibilities 4-4
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 4 - PLANNING AND BUDGETING FOR THE OPERATING TEAR
1. PURPOSE
This chapter describes EPA's process for planning and budgeting for the
Operating Year. EPA begins planning and budgeting for the Operating Year
after the President's Budget is submitted to Congress in January and completes
the process by the following September 30th, just before the start of the new
fiscal year. This eight-month phase of EPA's planning and budgeting process
is sometimes referred to as the "Budget Review Phase".
2. OVERVIEW
The principal objective of EPA's planning and budgeting activities in the
Budget Review phase is to develop an Operating Plan for the upcoming fiscal
year. The Operating Plan is a detailed and accurate plan for EPA operations
and resource expenditures in the Operating Year. During the Budget Review
phase, EPA must also interact with Congress, by preparing materials in support
of EPA's portion of the President's Budget, testifying before relevant Con-
gressional committees and subcommittees, and monitoring Congressional action
on the Budget.
a. Overview of the Process
An overview of the process for developing an Operating Plan is shown
in Figure 4-1. In brief summary, this process consists of the following major
interim and final steps (for details, see Section 3 of this chapter):
• Interaction With Congress
Congressional review of the EPA portion of the President's Budget
begins in late January or early February. Throughout the Budget
Review phase, EPA managers are responsible for preparing backup
and briefing material for Congress, briefing Congressional staff,
and testifying at committee and subcommittee hearings.
• Issuance of the Agency Operating Guidance
In February, the Administrator issues the Agency Guidance. The
portion of this document that addresses the Operating Year
provides overall direction for the development of the Operating
Plan.
• Phase I Operating Plan
By late March, EPA also prepares an initial, "Phase I" version of
the Operating Plan. This version of the Operating Plan
4-1
-------
Figure 4-1
OVERVIEW OF THE BUDGET REVIEW PHASE
ORGANIZATION
BUDGET REVIEW PHASE
JAN
FEE
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
(D
CO
O
c
1-1
n
CONGRESS
PRESIDENT'S
BUDGET
CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW
PASSAGE OF APPROPRIATIONS
PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL!/
OP
ex
OQ
ro
g
M
OMB
EPA
EPA PROVIDES MATERIALS AND TESTIMONY
REGIONAL
WORKLOAD
ANALYSIS
A
0
G
3ENCY
'ERATING
J I DANCE
-,
PHASE I
OPERATING
PI AN
. ^
REGIONAL
TARGETS
\
1
(
1
REGIONAL
DERATING
•)l ANV
J ouocr
APPORTIONMENT
, DEPROGRAMMING „
(REQUESTS TO OMB )
AND CONGRESS
ALLOTMENT
OF FUNDS
iDVICES OF
ALLOWANCE
CURRENT YEAR
ACTIVITIES
.]/ In some cases, final appropriations may not be enacted by September 30. In such
cases, EPA operates under a continuing resolution.
OO O
Oi O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
distributes Headquarters totals found in the President's Budget
among Headquarters "Allowance Holders". An "Allowance Holder" is
a manager who is responsible for implementing a part of the
Operating Plan and for reporting on the progress of the program
and the budget. In addition, in the Phase I Plan most of these
Headquarters resources are distributed by object class.
Allocation of Workyear Targets by Region
In developing its Operating Plan for the upcoming fiscal year,
one of EPA's objectives is to decide how to distribute workyear
and dollar resources among the ten Regional Offices. By late
March, in addition to developing the Phase I Operating Plan, EPA
allocates workyears by Region. This allocation is based largely
on the results of "workload modeling", an exercise led by the
NPMs in consultation with the Regions. "Workload models" are
described in detail in Section 3 of this chapter.
Phase II Operating Plan
From early April through late May, EPA develops a more detailed,
"Phase II" version of its Operating Plan. One objective of the
Phase II Plan is to develop a greater level of detail in the
allocation of dollar resources for the Regions (e.g., by object
class). Another objective is to realign or change workyear and
dollar resources requested for EPA in the President's Budget, for
example to reflect updated assumptions about the pattern of EPA
activities in the upcoming fiscal year. As described in Section
3 of this Chapter, these realignments are subject to various
limits, and in some cases must receive OMB and Congressional
approval.
Phase III Operating Plan
This is the final version of EPA's Operating Plan, completed by
mid-September, and then submitted to OMB and Congress for
approval. This final version of the Operating Plan contains
necessary revisions to the Phase II plan to accommodate EPA
appropriations as finally enacted. In addition, the Phase III
plan contains details not addressed in the Phase II version
(e.g., quarterly distributions of all resources; detailed con-
tract plans; Regional ADP timeshare plans). If EPA's appropria-
tions are not enacted in time for the October 1 startup of the
new fiscal year, the final version of the Phase III plan is
delayed, and EPA operates under a continuing resolution.
Apportionment
In September, EPA also submits a request to OMB describing how
the Agency would like to have its resources apportioned — i.e.,
4-3
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
made available for obligation on a quarter-by-quarter basis for
the upcoming fiscal year. OMB issues its apportionment of EPA's
resources just before the start of the new fiscal year.
b. Definitions and Key Concepts
The result of the process described above is the Agency Operating
Plan. The Operating Plan specifies detailed targets for workyear and dollar
expenditures for EPA's planned activities and accomplishments for the upcoming
fiscal year. The resource targets are broken out to the program element
level of detail. (See Chapter 2 for a definition of program elements.) These
targets are also divided into Headquarters and Regional components and are
further subdivided into object classes (e.g., personnel compensation and
benefits, travel, equipment, supplies). In addition, the Agency develops a
set of performance commitments which will be tracked during the upcoming
fiscal year in the Strategic Planning and Management System (SPMS). (See
Chapter 6 for a detailed discussion of SPMS.)
The development of the Operating Plan requires substantial work on
the part of Agency managers because;
• Some of the assumptions that went into the formulation of
the EPA portion of the President's Budget may no longer be
valid. For example, in the formulation of the EPA portion
of the President's Budget many months ago, an assumption
might have been made that EPA's RCRA program would have to
process 200 permit applications of a particular type in the
target year. With the target year now only a relatively
few months away, it may now be apparent that, in fact,
there are likely to be three times as many permit applica-
tions of this type to review (e.g., based on more recent
experience). As a result, it may be appropriate in the
Operating Plan to allocate more resources for the upcoming
fiscal year into this program element. (As described
below, such reallocations are referred to as
"reprogrammings".)
• Priorities for EPA might have changed. For example, the
Administrator may have recently decided that EPA should
place an increased emphasis on Program X in the upcoming
fiscal year. As part of the preparation of the Operating
Plan for the upcoming fiscal year, it may be necessary for
EPA to adjust plans for the upcoming fiscal year in
preparation for this new initiative.
• EPA must allocate resources among individual Regions. As
described in Chapter 3, the EPA portion of the President's
Budget indicates the aggregate amount of resources that the
4-4
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
President is requesting for EPA's Regional Offices. How-
ever, the President's Budget does not allocate these
resources among individual Regions. Part of EPA's job in
developing the Operating Plan is to prepare such a Region-
by-Region and quarterly allocation of resources. As
described in more detail in Section 3, below, EPA makes use
of "workload models" in preparing the region-by-region
allocation.
• Final action on the President's Budget nay require EPA to
adjust its plans for the upcoming fiscal year. After
considering the EPA portion of the President's Budget,
Congress may pass, and the President may sign
appropriations bills that provide a different level or
distribution of resources for the Agency than what was
originally proposed in the President's Budget. For
example, the President may have requested $10 million for a
particular program; the appropriation bill passed by
Congress might appropriate $12 million for that program.
In light of changed emphasis or other situations, the Operating
Plan is the mechanism which provides a more detailed and accurate plan for the
allocation of resources requested in the President's Budget, and adjusted by
the appropriation.
3. PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPING THE AGENCY OPERATING PLAN
The purpose of this section is to describe in detail the procedures for
developing the Agency Operating Plan and the related activities that are part
of the eight month Budget Review Phase. Figure 4-2 presents a schedule of
these activities.
a. EPA Interacts with Congress
Congressional review of the EPA portion of the President's Budget
begins in late January or early February. It is the responsibility of EPA:
• To prepare backup written materials;
• To brief Congressional staff; and,
• To testify at committee and subcommittee hearings.
These efforts include anticipating any questions that might be posed at the
hearings, preparing responses, and referencing these responses to the appro-
priate pages in the Congressional Budget.
Many of the responsibilities for interacting with Congress are dele-
gated to the National Program Managers (NPMs), under the coordination of the
4-5
-------
Figure 4-2
SCHEDULE OF MAJOR ACTIVITIES IN THE BUDGET REVIEW PHASE
CO
o
H
o
(D
H-
O
00
00
(B
3
(TO
3
OCT
1. EPA Interacts with Congress
(Sections 4.3.a, 4.3.g)
2. Issuance of Agency Operating
Guidance (Section 4.3.b)
(prepared by OMSE)
3. Prepare Regional Workload
Allocations (Section 4.3.c)
4. Development of Phase I
Operating Plan
(Section 4.3.d)
5. Development of Phase II
Operating Plan
(Section 4.3.e)
6. Define SPMS Performance
Objectives (Section 4.3.f)
7. Development of Phase III
Operating Plan
(Section 4.3.h)
8. Apportionment
(Section 4.3.i)
NEW
FISCAL
YEAR
OO O
Ln O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Office of the Comptroller. The Office of the Comptroller and the NPMs are
often called on to prepare their testimony, to prepare written responses, and,
in some cases, to edit hearings transcripts.
To help ensure consistency with Administration policy, much of EPA's
material — e.g., prepared remarks for hearings — must be cleared in advance
by EPA's Office of Congressional Liaison and/or the Office of the Comptroller
and by OMB. OMB Circular A-10 explicitly defines the requirements for con-
fidentiality of budget information. The confidential nature of agency
submissions, requests, recommendations, supporting materials and similar
communications should be maintained since these documents are an integral part
of the process by which the President resolves budget issues and develops re-
commendations to the Congress. The head of each agency is responsible for
preventing premature disclosures of this budgetary information. Presidential
budget decisions are not final until the budget itself is transmitted to Con-
gress; at that time the budget becomes public information.
b. OMSE Issues New Agency Operating Guidance (February)
In February, OMSE issues the Agency Operating Guidance for the Office
of the Administrator. It provides Agency-wide direction from top management
for planning for the Operating Year as well as the Budget Year. It identi-
fies, for Headquarters and Regional office managers and State Environmental
Directors, the major program-specific priorities. The part of the Guidance
that addresses the Operating Year takes into account the expected level of
resources for the upcoming year, as reflected in the EPA portion of the
President's Budget.
For the Operating Year, the Agency Guidance addresses a specific list
of 30-35 priority activities. This list is developed through discussions and
negotiations between the Deputy Administrator, the Assistant Administrators,
Regional Administrators, and outside groups. The NPM submission to the Agency
Guidance also includes an introductory narrative strategy paper (3 to 5 pages
long) identifying the program's mission, goals, and program objectives for
both of the target years. The Agency Operating Guidance also includes the
performance measures to be included in Agency's accountability systems and
used to track success in achieving program objectives. For details on
developing the Agency Operating Guidance see Chapter 3.
c. The NPMs Prepare Phase I Plans (Late March)
The purpose of this process is to initiate development of the
Headquarters Operating Plan. The objective of Phase I is to allocate the
Headquarters object class distribution totals of the President's Budget among
Headquarters Allowance Holders. In early March the Office of the Comptroller
issues directions — Phase I Call Letter — to provide guidance in preparing
Phase I of the Operating Plan.
4-7
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
The Phase I Call Letter outlines the procedures for developing the
Operating Plan and includes the forms for the Allowance Holder distribution.
There is one form for each program element, and each form includes an object
class distribution of the President's Budget for that program element.
The completed Phase I Operating Plan contains the Headquarter's
RPIOs1 plans for distribution of the Salaries and Expenses appropriation, the
Abatement, Control and Compliance appropriation, the Research and Development
appropriation, the Building and Facilities appropriation, and the Superfund
appropriation by program element and object class. Program element and object
class totals in the President's Budget must remain unchanged in the Phase I
Operating Plan.
d. Regions and NPMs Prepare Initial Allocation of Workyear Target by
Region (March)
In developing its Operating Plan for the upcoming fiscal year, one of
EPA's challenges is deciding how to distribute its workyear and dollar re-
sources among the ten Regional Offices. EPA employs workload models to allo-
cate workyears by Region. Once workyears have been allocated to individual
Regions the Office of the Comptroller distributes corresponding dollar
resources to the Regions. Subsection (1) describes the workload models; sub-
section (2) describes the system for selecting programs to do workload models;
and subsection (3) describes the process of applying the workload model to
allocate workyears to each Region.
(1) Workload Analysis - Development of Workload Models
Workload analysis bridges EPA's Budget Formulation Phase and
Budget Review Phase. The existence of a Regional structure requires some
rational method for deciding precisely how the workyears and funds should be
distributed among the Regions. Workload models are the mechanisms used by EPA
program managers to make these distributions. Workload distributions are
based, technically, on four parts.
(a) Activities, breaking the program into smaller pieces (e.g.,
work in-delegated States and oversight of work in delegated
States). The Office of the Comptroller encourages the pro-
grams to use activities similar to those in the OMB sub-
mission (BUD-2) and to relate to the outputs tracked in the
Strategic Planning and Management system.
(b) Raw Data, the objective information used in calculations
(for example, number of major sources by Region). Practi-
tioners sometimes refer to this information as the "ex-
ternal factor."
4-8
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(c) Pricing Factors, which relate the raw data to workload
(e.g., it takes 25 workdays to process a permit of a
certain type; an activity requires one workyear per Region
or per State).
(d) Calibration, which ensures that the totals derived from the
workload exercise are the same as those in the President's
Budget. For example, some models quantify total need,
which usually exceeds the workyears available in the bud-
get. An adjustment is needed to reduce the results to the
actual available resources. Some programs, for example,
use sophisticated priority assessments of individual
activities to bring down the total to the President's
Budget by eliminating low priority activities. Or modelers
may feel that, for various reasons, one Region received too
much from the normal application of the model and an
adjustment is made. In addition, use of the model may
result in too dramatic a shift from one year to the next.
To deal with these problems, modelers may give weight to
the historical distribution of resources, even if the model
produces a lower "need." Some models have ceilings or
floors added to keep the distributions within some fixed
percentage of change from the previous year. Sometimes,
subjective judgments are made to add or subtract from a
particular Region's allocation. Whatever the method of
calibration, they are encouraged to explain the rationale
for the Regions to understand and comment.
Some workload models calibrate themselves by distributing
precisely the same workyears as are available using per-
centages instead of absolute measures of workload. They
are called relative need models. Others attempt to esti-
mate need, then apply various methods to calibrate to the
proper total. They are referred to as absolute need
models. Figure 4-3 is an example of workload model
terminology.
4-9
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
FIGURE 4-3
Example of Terminology Used in Workload Models
Workload depends on Pricing Factor and Raw Data
WORKLOAD = PRICE X FREQUENCY
Workyears = Workload x no. permits
Permit
• In Water Permits, some major permits take 25 workdays (0.1
workyear) to process. Region Y will process 15 permits
this year. Therefore, it needs 1.5 workyears for this
activity:
1.5 Werkyears =0.1 Workyear/Permit x 15 Permits
• If the total workload for those permits is, say, 50 work-
years (sum to 10 Regions) but only 40 are available, one
method of CALIBRATION is to distribute 40/50 (.8) of each
Region's total for that activity.
4-10
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
(2) Tier System - Selection of Programs for Close Scrutiny
A new system was developed for FY86 to streamline the management
of the process. Instead of changing all the program models each year, the
FY86 process will be characterized by the three tier system of program models;
the models are divided according to the amount of change anticipated in the
program. Tier I contains seven programs; new models will be developed for
each of these programs. The seven programs in Tier I were selected on the
basis that they will probably have significant changes in resources or program
direction. The goal is to devote considerable development time in return for
an excellent distribution of resources supported by an exemplary workload
model. Twelve programs were tentatively selected for Tier II. The primary
criterion for entry into Tier II is an anticipated resource change of 10% or a
significant change in direction. Twenty-five programs are in Tier III.
Program and resource stability characterize the Tier III programs; no work
will be done on Tier III models.
The Regions and NPMs will expend little time on the models for
Tiers II or III, although the distribution may change somewhat because of
changes in raw data or calibration. The process of dividing the programs into
tiers begins in May during the Budget Formulation Phase when the Office of the
Comptroller selects the programs to be remodeled (Tier I). The Office of the
Comptroller solicits suggestions on those programs for which the current
models need extensive work, whether because of changed program direction or an
inadequate model; in addition, each year a small number of other programs are
included in Tier I such that all programs eventually move into the first tier.
In September of the Budget Formulation Phase, the programs whose resources or
mix of activities will likely change significantly in the President's Budget
are selected. Those programs become Tier II programs; their distribution will
be modified based on anticipated program changes. The remaining programs will
experience little change in their resource distribution; they are the Tier III
programs.
(3) Process of Allocating Workyears to Region
The initial allocation of Regional workyears is formally started
in January when the Comptroller issues a Call Letter to the NPMs and Deputy
Regional Administrators. This Call Letter asks for the NPMs and the Regions
to work together to allocate the Regional workyears in the President's Budget
among the ten Regional Offices. The NPMs and the RAs make heavy use of
"workload models" in performing this allocation.
The Call Letter contains:
• Guidelines for developing and documenting the models;
and
• General reminders of the need for the activities in
the workload models to correspond to the program
4-11
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
objectives specified in the BUD-2 forms that were pre-
pared as part of the Budget Formulation Phase. In the
past, a "White Paper" explaining the workload model
concept and the connection between the workload models
and other management systems accompanied the Call
Letter.
In most cases, with close cooperation with the Regions, the NPMs
lead the process of developing and applying the workload models for the up-
coming fiscal year. The result of developing and applying the workload models
is a Region by Region allocation of workyears by program element. Although
the focus is on workyears, the NPMs also submit extramural dollar figures in
March. The Office of the Comptroller distributes dollar resource targets to
support those workyears based on the Regional distribution. For each program,
one of the Regions acts as the "Lead Region." The -Lead Region for a
particular program attempts to represents the interests of all the other
Regions with respect to that program.
After receiving distributions based on the workload models, the
Regions have the opportunity to appeal their proposed workload models to
Senior Management. The Regions have agreed to use different thresholds for
appeal depending on which tier a program is in:
Tier I Unlimited.
Tier II _+ 10% from a documentable alternative to the proposed
distribution.
Tier III +_ 10% from a Prorated distribution prepared by the
Comptroller based on carrying Regional percentage
shares of the previous year into the new year's total.
The limits were selected to avoid small appeals while concentrating on major
issues that appeared during development of the model.
The Comptroller's Office analyzes the appeals and recommends
adjustments to EPA Senior Management.
e. Regions and Headquarters Prepare Phase II Operating Plans (Early
April through late July)
(1) Objectives of the Phase II Operating Plan
When the Agency has completed the Regional workload model pro-
cess, the development of the Phase II Operating Plan begins. There are five
major objectives in developing the Phase II Operating Plan.
• To develop a greater level of detail in Regional
object class allocations. In the Phase II Plan, the
4-12
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Regional Allowance Holders allocate resources for
other types of object classes, including supplies and
equipment.
• To re program dollar and workyear resources between
program elements. For example, the President's Budget
may have allocated $5 million to one Headquarters pro-
gram element and $2 million to another. However,
because of new Agency initiatives or priorities, it
may be in the best interest of the Agency to take away
$1 million from the first program element and add it
to the second. These kinds of adjustments are called
reprogranmings.
• To realign dollar and workyear resources to reflect
restructurings. From time to time EPA adjusts its
budget structure — for example, by splitting one pro-
gram element into two, or by combining two program
elements — to ensure that the budget structure most
accurately reflects the nature of Agency programs. As
EPA's mission continues to change and evolve, so must
the budget structure. In cases where restructurings
will affect the upcoming fiscal year, these changes
are reflected in the Phase II Operating Plan.
• To realign dollar and workyear resources to reflect
reorganizations. Any significant internal EPA re-
organization (e.g., the recent creation of the new
Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection) will
require a corresponding adjustment of resources.
Reorganizations that are implemented after the submis-
sion of the .President's Budget must be reflected in
the Phase II Operating Plan.
• To develop actual work plans for the coming fiscal
year and allocate workyear resources by program ele-
ment for each individual Region. For example, the
workyear values produced by the models must be trans-
lated into actual positions. Listings of equipment
that will be required, travel to be undertaken, and a
variety of other detailed items of information will
also be identified, reviewed, and consolidated with
the personnel data into realistic plans for the up-
coming fiscal year.
When complete, the Phase II Operating Plan will contain dollar
amounts for every program element and object class for every Region and Head-
quarters. It will also contain FTEs for every program element, for every
4-13
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Region, and for Headquarters. The FTEs will be broken out by "permanent full-
time equivalents" (PFTEs) and "other-than permanent full-time equivalents"
(OPFTEs). PFTEs are employees who work a full time schedule (eighty hours per
pay period) and meet certain other qualifications. "OPFTEs" are employees the
Agency hires under:
• Part time permanent appointments;
• Part time temporary or indefinite appointments;
• Full time temporary or indefinite appointments; and
• Intermittent appointments. In addition, state
assignees (iPAs) are classified as OPFTEs.
(2) Process
The process of developing the Phase II Operating Plan consists
of three major activities:
• Issuance by Office of the Comptroller of the Phase II
Call Letter;
• Changes to the program element and object class to-
tals — called reprogrammings or restructurings; and
• Submission of proposed Phase II Operating Plans to the
Office of the Comptroller for consolidation.
The following subsections discuss these activities in more detail.
(a) Issuance of the Phase II Call Letter
In late March or early April, the Office of the
Comptroller issues a Phase II Call Letter to the NPMs,
their SBOs, and to Regional budget officers. The Call
Letter provides several types of information to help
the NPMs and RAs develop their Phase II Plans:
• General instructions in the expected schedule of
events for developing and submitting the Phase II
plans to the Office of the Comptroller;
• Forms, and instructions to complete the forms;
and;
• Specific directives on the allocation of dollar
and resources to a greater level of detail.
4-14
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
These directives can be targets or ceilings or
floors or guidance.
The first two types of information are self explana-
tory. The remainder of this section will discuss the
specific targets, ceilings, floors and guidance that
the Office of the Comptroller issued to the NPMs and
RAs.
The terms targets, guidance, ceilings and floor have
specific significance in the budget process. A target
is a resource level that must be met. If the Office
of the Comptroller issues a program element target, it
means that, regardless of the object class breakdown
within the program element, the program element total
must remain static. On the other hand, if the Office
of the Comptroller issues guidance on specific alloca-
tions, some variation is allowed. In some cases,
Office of the Comptroller issues program element tar-
gets and object class guidance. A floor is a minimum
amount that an Allowance Holder must allocate to a
specific element or object class. The Office of the
Comptroller issues PC&B floors for each program ele-
ment in both Regional and Headquarters offices. The
PC&B floor is determined by the number of workyears
allocated to the program, the program's current year
PC&B per workyear cost, and any cost increasing or
decreasing factors. A ceiling is the maximum an
Allowance Holder can allocate to a specific object
class. For example, each Region and AA has a Travel
ceiling for the S&E appropriation. The Office of the
Comptroller determines a Region's travel ceiling by
considering the amount a particular region received in
current year, the amount the region is requesting for
the coming year and the total Agency ceiling defined
by Congress. From those figures, the Office of the
Comptroller makes an equitable distribution of travel
funds.
Some targets will be relevant only to Regional pro-
grams, others only to Headquarters, still other
targets will apply to both. For example, targets
within the AC&C appropriation will apply only to
Regions. Most (though not all) of the targets within
the Superfund Appropriation will apply to Head-
quarters, and targets within the S&E Appropriation
apply to Regions and Headquarters.
4-15
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
The level of detail of the target/guidance/ceiling
will vary according to Appropriation and also
according to whether the target/guidance is directed
to Headquarters or Regional allocation of dollars and
workyears. For example, the S&E targets directed to
the Regions contain object class guidance for PC&B
dollars and "expenses" dollars; there is no further
guidance on the breakdown of object classes. On the
other hand, the Headquarters Allowance Holder targets
initiated originally by the NPMs (i.e., the Phase I
plans) and sent back to the NPMs as Phase II targets,
are broken down to detailed object classes targets,
not only PC&B, but also all other object classes.
(b) Development of the Phase II Materials:
In response to the Phase II Call Letter, NPMs and
Regional Administrators begin the process of formu-
lating their portions of the Phase II Plan. The NPMs
are responsible for developing Phase II plans for
their Headquarters offices. In addition, the Regional
Administrators are asked to submit Phase II plans for
their Regions by early May. In developing their Phase
II plans, the NPMs and the Regional Administrators
translate the program element dollar targets into
object class levels of detail; in addition, changes —
reprogrammings or restructurings — are considered for
the first time. Several guidelines are applicable:
• Each proposed reprogramning or restructuring
between program elements must aggregate to zero
within the constraints of the totals of the
President's Budget. For example, reprogramming
must not change the total Regional allocation of
dollars and workyears contained in the Presi-
dent's Budget.
• An RPIO may submit a change request only to real-
locate resources that are already part of his or
her total targets; an RPIO may not request addi-
tional resources through this procedure.
In the Call Letter the RPIOs receive computerized
change request forms — one form for each program
element and section of law within an Allowance. The
forms contain the object class targets, and provide
spaces in which the RPIO specifies whether the program
element gains ( + ) or loses (-) resources as a result
of the change.
4-16
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• A separate change request form must be completed
for any reprogrammings between program elements.
The change requests must contain explanations and
impact statements for all program elements which
are gaining or losing resources. An explanation
of where resources are being reprogrammed "to and
from" should be included in the narratives. Six
digit change request numbers must be assigned
sequentially. The first two digits are the RPIO
number, the third is for the fiscal year (e.g.,
"5" for FY85) and the next three digits are the
actual change number. Each change request number
must net to zero in terms of resources moved
between program elements.
• Every reprogramming request should completely and
concisely describe the reason for the request and
programmatic impacts of the change. The losing
program element must describe the impact of the
loss to the program; the gaining program elements
must describe the reason resources are being
added. These justifications are the back-up
material that will be used to gain approval from
OMB and Congress where required; therefore, they
must be positive and thorough.
• Each reprogramming action must net to zero.
Therefore, if resources are moved from one pro-
gram element into two other program elements, all
three program elements pages should be stapled
together, with the losing element on top, and one
change number assigned to all three pages.
• Change requests which move resources between
object classes within a program element may be
grouped together as one change request with one
change request number. No impact statement need
be given for this group of reprogrammings. (This
exception applies only to the Phase II submis-
sion. Full explanations must be provided for
object class change requests in Current Year pro-
cessing). However, any major shifts between
object classes which clearly reflect a specific
initiative should be treated as a separate change
request, with the appropriate explanations (e.g.,
moving a large amount of funds into equipment for
the purchase of a minicomputer). It is often
4-17
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
advisable to keep reprogrammings and restructur-
ings to a minimum in the Operating Plan and to
defer such actions until the Current year.
(c) Consolidation and Finalization of the Phase II Oper-
ating Plans (May - June)
By the middle of May, the Regional Administrators and
National Program managers submit their Phase II Plans
to the Office of the Comptroller. An important aspect
of the Phase II submission is the Highlight Memoran-
dum, addressed to the Administrator, which highlights
major program initiatives, policy or program differ-
ences from the President's Budget, and changes in
resource allocations from the targets.
After the Office of the Comptroller receives both the
Regional and Headquarters Phase II plans, the plans
are consolidated, the data are edited for accuracy,
differences between the Regional and National alloca-
tions are resolved and the changes are entered into
the automated Resources Management Information System
(RMIS). During this consolidation process, differ-
ences which cannot be resolved with the Comptroller
acting as "honest broker" may be appealed to the
Administrator for resolution. The Agency Phase II is
complete by late July.
f. Agency Managers Define Performance Objectives and Commitments
(June/July)
After the RPIOs and Allowance Holders have submitted their proposed
Phase II Operating Plans, they turn their attention to developing their
performance goals and objectives which will be tracked by the Strategic Plan-
ning and Management System (SPMS). This process is described in detail in
Chapter 7.
In addition, the Regional Administrators prepare their Superfund
accomplishment plans to be submitted to the Office of the Comptroller before
the new fiscal year. The Superfund accomplishment plans serve as a basis for
the allocation of funds to the regions for removal and remedial work under the
Superfund appropriation.
g. EPA Continues to Interact With Congress
At the same time EPA is developing its Phase II Operating Plan,
Congressional Committees and Subcommittees are continuing to meet to review
and modify the EPA portion of the President's Budget. If the House and Senate
4-18
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
have each completed action on the Appropriations Bills, a House-Senate Confer-
ence is held to resolve the differences between the two versions. Ideally,
Congress passes appropriations legislation before the August recess. During
this time, the Office of the Comptroller prepares a detailed analysis of
Congressional actions showing the funding approvals at each legislative stage,
and the final amounts for each program. The analysis also lists each statu-
tory and/or Committee restriction applicable to the Agency for future
followup.
When all Congressional action is completed, and the President is
satisfied with the appropriations legislation, he signs the Bill into law.
(if the Appropriation Bill is not signed by the start of the new fiscal year,
EPA will begin to operate under a continuing resolution. Continuing resolu-
tions are discussed in Chapter 5.) The law may contain specific provisions
restricting Agency discretion over the use of the funds for example, ceilings
or floors on particular program elements or object classes. The wishes of
Congress may also be expressed in Committee and Conference Repor-ts — for
example, the provision that the Agency must obtain prior Committee Approval of
any reprogramming actions over a certain threshold. In FY85 the threshold is
$1,000,000 for the House and $500,000 for the Senate.
h. Development of the Phase III Operating Plan - Quarterly Spread
(August-September)
In late July the Office of the Comptroller issues a Call Letter to
RPIOs (Management Division Directors) or their SBOs, requesting three items
from the RPIOs:
• A quarterly distribution of the approved Phase II plans;
• A summarized Annual Plan, showing a quarterly breakdown of
actions to be processed by Procurement and Contracts
Management Division, and a detailed first quarter Plan,
showing specific details for all actions. (Detailed plans
for the second through fourth quarters are due later in the
year.)
• Regional ADP Timeshare plans.
The contract plans are primarily for the use of the Contracts Management Divi-
sion in planning their workload for the coming year. The schedule in the con-
tract plan must be consistent with the obligation pattern shown in the Phase
III Operating Plan. Included in the Phase III Call Letter are computerized
change request forms similar to those distributed in Phase II, and instruc-
tions to complete them. For additional guidance on the allocation of contract
plans and Regional ADP timeshare targets, refer to the Contracts Management
Manual, Chapter 1, Acquisition Planning System. The Allowance Holders are
reminded that no reprogrammings are allowed during this phase of the Budget
Review Process.
4-19
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
In response to the Phase III Call Letter, the RPIOs submit their
proposed Phase III Operating Plans to the Office of the Comptroller by early
August. The submission includes a planned quarterly distribution of resources
by Allowance Holder, program element, section of law and object class. After
consolidating the RPIOs' Plans, the Office of the Comptroller submits the
Agency Operating Plan to Congressional Appropriations Committees for approval
of the reprogrammings that took place in Phase II. In the FY 85 budget there
were only three reprogrammings or restructurings which required Congressional
approval. After final Congressional action on EPA's Budget (i.e., the
Congress has passed and the President has signed the relevant appropriations),
EPA adjusts the Phase III plans to incorporate final Congressional action.
This Congressional action may take the form of additional funds to the Budget
or more restrictions on the use of certain appropriations. If a close liaison
has been established between Congress and the Office of the Comptroller, these
final actions may be minimized (although if Congress disagrees with the
Administration, no amount of negotiation will prevent Congressional changes).
i. Apportionment Request
After incorporating the Congressional changes, the Office of the
Comptroller sends the Phase III Operating Plan (the Plan with proposed
quarterly distribution) to OMB and requests apportionment. Apportionment is
the quarterly distribution of EPA's spending authority for the upcoming fiscal
year. Prior to apportionment, OMB may require additional justifications for
significant changes from the President's Budget. OMB may also issue new
restictions on individual program elements by restricting spending in a
particular quarter.
4. OVERVIEW OF PLAYERS AND ROLES
As indicated in the preceding sections of this Chapter, considerable work
must be performed by a wide variety of Agency managers and staff in preparing
for the Operating Year. The following subsections re-cap the roles of the key
players in this process; for convenience, the following discussion is summar-
ized in Figure 4-4.
a. Assistant Administrators and Their Subordinate Managers and Staff
In the Budget Review phase, Assistant Administrators (AAs) are
National Program Managers (NPMs). Each AA is an NPM. There are also three
other NPMs — one each for the Office of the Administrator, the Office of the
Inspector General and the Office of General Counsel.
The NPMs are responsible for developing the Headquarters portion of
the Operating Plan for their programs, and for helping lead and coordinate the
development of the Regional targets for the Regional Operating Plan for their
programs. Key responsibilities include the following:
• Helping Develop the Agency Operating Guidance. Each
4-20
-------
Figure 4-4
SUMMARY OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
CD
W
O
c
Assistant Administrators/National
Program Managers
(Assisted by their Program
Managers and Senior Budget
Officers)
Regional Administrators
(Assisted by their Program
Managers and their Management
Division Director or Assistant
Regional Administrator for
Management)
Office of the Comptroller
Office of Management Systems
and Evaluation (OMSK)
Administrator and Deputy
Administrator
Help develop the Agency Operating Guidance
Develop the Headquarters Portion of the Operating Plan for their media
Coordinate workload modelling for their programs
Consult with Regions in the development of Regional Operating Plans
Prepare materials for Congress and testify at Congressional Hearings
Participate in workload modelling (in some cases as Lead Regions)
Develop Regional Operating Plans
Coordinate Budget Review Phase activities on behalf of senior Agency management,
e.g.:
Issue Call Letters and other memoranda
— Provide technical assistance and information
— Monitor Congressional action
— Prepare apportionment request
Play role of "Honest Broker" (e.g., attempt to settle disagreements among NPMs and
RAs regarding alLections of Regional resources)
In consultation with the Administrator and Deputy Administrator, coordinate
the development of the Agency Operating Guidance.
Coordinate the development of performance measures and commitments (e.g., for
the Strategic Planning and Management System).
Develop Administrator's and Deputy Administor's statements for the Agency Guidance
Hear and resolve appeals that are not resolved by the Office of the Comptroller
Represent EPA to OMB and the Congress
3
3
to
a.
w
d
CL
TO
(D
rt
H-
3
00
s
p>
3
ft)
N)
ts3
OO O
i-n O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Assistant Administrator is responsible for helping formu-
late and articulate the plans and priorities for the Head-
quarters portion of their media.
• Developing the Headquarters Portions of the Operating Plan
for Their Media. Each NPM has the lead responsibility for
formulating the Headquarters portion of the Operating Plan.
For example, the AA for Water (who is also the NPM for
Drinking Water programs) is responsible for developing, and
submitting to senior Agency management, a proposed plan of
activities and allocation of resources for all Headquarters
activities within the Office of Water for the upcoming
fiscal year.
• Assisting in Developing Workload Models to allocate
resources to each region.
• Working With Regions to Develop Regional Operating Plans
for Their Media. The Operating Plan breaks out the
Regional resources into program element, object class and
quarterly totals for each Region. The NPMs consult with
the Regions in developing these plans. For example, the
NPM for Water will advise the Regional Administrators with
respect to resource allocations for Water-related programs
in the Regional Offices. However, the Regional Administra-
tors have the full authority for developing their plans and
resource allocations within their targets.
• Preparing Materials for Congress and Testifying at OMB and
Congressional Hearings. Throughout the Budget Review
phase, Assistant Administrators are called on to prepare
additional materials for OMB and Congress, to provide tes-
timony, to testify at Appropriation Hearings and to help
senior Agency managers (e.g., the Administrator and Deputy
Administrator) prepare for their interactions with Con-
gress. In all interaction with OMB and Congress, Assistant
Administrators (and all other EPA managers and staff) are
expected to support official Administration positions. In
addition, even written material submitted for OMB's inter-
nal consideration must be carefully worded, because this
material may later be requested for review by Congress.
In performing their responsibilities, the National Program Managers
rely heavily on assistance from their Senior Budget Officers (SBOs). In some
cases, NPMs rely on the SBOs to take the lead in preparing the budget
materials, subject, of course, to NPM review and approval. In addition, NPMs
call on their program managers (e.g., Office Directors) to help prepare mater-
ials and participate in the decision-making processes that are a part of each
NPM's responsibilities.
4-22
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
For purposes of allocating and managing resources — budget execu-
tion— Assistant Administrators (and selected other Agency managers, such as
Regional Administrators), are called Responsible Planning and Implementation
Offices (RPIOs) and some of their subordinate program managers are called
Allowance Holders. For details on the responsibilities of RPIOs and Allowance
Holders, see Chapter 5.
b. Regional Administrators and Their Subordinate Managers and Staff
Each Regional Administrator (RA) is responsible for leading and coor-
dinating the development of the Operating Plan for his or her Region. The RAs
are responsible for developing the Operating Plans for their Region, within
their resource targets.
In performing their responsibilities, the Regional Administrators
typically depend heavily on one individual who serves essentially as their
chief budget officer. In many Regions this individual is the Management Divi-
sion Director or the Assistant Regional Administrator for management. In
addition, other Regional Division Directors may also participate in the
development of Regional planning and budgeting materials in the Budget Review
phase.
c. Office of the Comptroller
The Office of the Comptroller (OC) is the control center for the
entire budget process and has two major sets of responsibilities in the Budget
Review Phase. First, the Office of the Comptroller is responsible for
coordinating the Budget Review activities for the Agency on behalf of senior
Agency management. For example, Office of the Comptroller formally initiates
each step of the budget review process by issuing instructions and forms ("Call
Letters" and other memoranda) and advising participants of expected content and
due dates for their next submission. The Office of the Comptroller coordinates
the paper flow, assuring that all parties receive the appropriate documents.
In addition, the Office of the Comptroller provides technical assistance and
information, and enters appropriate data into the computerized budget system
(the Resource Management Information System, or "RMIS"). The Office of the
Comptroller also consolidates submissions from the NPMs and Regional
Administrators for presentation to senior Agency management and Congress. The
Office of the Comptroller also takes the lead in developing the Agency's
request to OMB for apportionment of resources for the upcoming fiscal year. As
part of its role as the coordinator, the Office of the Comptroller monitors
Congressional action and publishes updates as necessary for distribution to the
relevant NPMs and RAs. This is especially critical for those who need to know
the status of the budget prior to testifying at Congressional hearings.
The Office of the Comptroller's second major role is that of the
"honest broker". For example, during the workload analysis there may be
disagreements between the NPMs and the Regional Administrators with respect to
the optimal allocation of resources among the Regions. One of the Office of
4-23
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
the Comptroller's roles is to attempt to resolve any such disagreements. If
the Office of the Comptroller is unsuccessful, the affected parties can appeal
to the Deputy Administrator or Administrator.
d. Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE)
OMSE has two major functions in the Budget Review phase. First, in
consultation with the Administrator, Assistant Administrators and Regional
Administrators (who consult with appropriate State officials), OMSE is respon-
sible for coordinating the development of the Agency Operating Guidance, which
is published in February. The process for developing this Guidance — which
covers both the Operating Year and the Budget Year — is described in Chapter
3.
OMSE is also responsible for coordinating and maintaining EPA's
accountability systems — the Strategic Planning and Management System (SPMS),
the Action Tracking System (ATS). These systems are used by the Administrator
and Deputy Administrator for tracking the performance of principal Agency
managers against an agreed-upon set of performance commitments which are
directly linked to the outputs defined in the BUD 2 documents. The performance
commitments for a particular fiscal year are negotiated and made final in the
months leading up to the fiscal year — i.e., parallel to the development of
the Operating Plan. In support of the Administrator and Deputy Administrator,
OMSE works with principal Agency managers during the summer and early fall to
develop their performance commitments for the upcoming fiscal year. The intent
is to coordinate this process closely with the development of the Operating
Plan, because the performance commitments to be tracked in SPMS and ATS
essentially represent a subset of the plans being prepared as part of the
Operating Plan.
e. Administrator and Deputy Administrator
The Administrator and Deputy Administrator provide overall direction
and management of the development of the Operating Plan. Key responsibilities
include:
• Issuing updated Guidance for the upcoming fiscal year (and
for the new Budget Year, which is now eighteen months in the
future). Under the current system, the Administrator and
Deputy Administrator rely heavily on OMSE to coordinate the
development of the Guidance, in cooperation with the NPMs and
other Agency managers.
• Hearing and resolving appeals that are not resolved by the
Office of the Comptroller. As summarized above, the Office
of the Comptroller attempts to resolve most disagreements
that might arise as part of the development of the Operating
Plan, but in some cases it is necessary for the Administrator
or Deputy Administrator to effect a final resolution. In
4-24
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
addition, in some cases the Administrator or Deputy Adminis-
trator will ask to review and approve tentative resolutions
worked out by the the Comptroller and making all final deci-
sions on the content of the Agency's Operating Plan for the
upcoming fiscal year. The Administrator and Deputy Adminis-
trator are heavily involved in setting overall strategic
objectives, reviewing and commenting on interim products in
the development of the Agency Guidance, and in reviewing and
approving the final version of the Guidance.
Representing EPA to OMB and the Congress. As summarized
above, many EPA managers may be called on to prepare mater-
ials for OMB and Congress or testify in connection with the
authorization and appropriation process for the upcoming
fiscal year. The Administrator and Deputy Administrator are
the chief spokespersons for the Agency in this process. The
way in which the Administrator and Deputy Administrator
choose to implement their responsibilities will vary de-
pending on the particular management style and approach of
these senior officials. For example, in some years the
Administrator may delegate many interim decision-making
responsibilities to the Office of the Comptroller; in other
years, fewer interim decision-making authorities might be
delegated.
4-25
-------
S. BUDGET EXECUTION
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 5 - MANAGING AND CONTROLLING RESOURCES IN THE CURRENT YEAR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION/SUBSECTION SECTION/SUBSECTION
TITLES NUMBERS
Purpose 1
Overview 2
The Current Year Process 2 . a
Definitions and Key Concepts 2.b
Planning and Budgeting for the Current Year 3
Commitments and Obligations of Funds 3.a
Charging to the Correct Appropriation 3.b
Changes and Reprogrammings 3. c
Limitations on Changes 3.d
Requesting Carryover Funds 3.e
Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund (Superfund) 3.f
Supplemental Appropriat ions 3 . g
Performance Tracking 3 .h
Overview of Players and Roles 4
Assistant Administrators 4. a
Regional Administrators 4.b
Office of the Comptroller 4.c
Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE) 4.d
Administrator and Deputy Administrator 4.e
FIGURE FIGURE
TITLES NUMBERS
Overview of Budget Execution Processes 5-1
Overview of Budget Execution Processes with OMB and
Congressional Approval 5-2
Advice of Allowance 5-3
Crosswalk Between RMIS and FMS Object Classes 5-4
Object Classes Allowed by Appropriation 5-5
Copy of Form OP-2B 5-6
Summary of Roles and Responsibilities 5-7
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 5 - MANAGING AND CONTROLLING RESOURCES
IN THE CURRENT YEAR
1. PURPOSE
7
This chapter describes the planning and budgeting activities that occur
during the Current Year. These activities include allocating resources among
EPA's organizational units, obligating the resources in accordance with the
Operating Plan within other applicable limits, and making adjustments to
plans, as necessary. (This Chapter does not cover procedures for financial
accounting; see EPA's Financial Management Manual.) The Current Year begins
on October 1st and continues for twelve months to the following September 30.
This twelve month period is often called the "Budget Execution" Phase.
2. OVERVIEW
a. The Current Year Process
At the beginning of the fiscal year, several activities occur:
• Updated information from the approved Operating Plan are
entered into the Office of the Comptroller's automated
budget system — the Resources Management Information System
(RMIS).
• The Office of the Comptroller issues Advices of Allowance to
each Allowance Holder which specify the amount of resources
available to the Allowance Holder. Initial Advices of
Allowance are sent with a cover memo which provides
guidance, ceilings and limitations for the new fiscal year.
• Allowance Holders begin to commit and obligate funds within
the limits specified in the Advices of Allowance.
As depicted in Figure 5-1, Allowance Holders commit and obligate
funds during the entire year. This is a cyclical process and, as they monitor
their resource usage during the year, they may find that certain accounts do
not have sufficient resources to cover all their expected needs for the year.
If that situation occurs, they request changes or "reprogrammings" to their
Operating Plan by sending a Change Request Form in advance to the Office of
the Comptroller. The Office of the Comptroller reviews the requests for
budgetary and programmatic impact and issues a revised Advice of Allowance.
As depicted in Figure 5-2, should the change request require approval by OMB
or Congress the issuance of a revised Advice of Allowance is delayed until the
Office of the Comptroller can obtain that approval.
5-1
-------
Figure 5-1
OVERVIEW OF BUDGET EXECUTION PROCESSES
en
O
i-l
O
Ol
I
N3
ORGANIZATION
CONGRESS
OMB
EPA
OFFICE OF THE
COMPTROLLER
EPA
ALLOWANCE
HOLDER
SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV
85 85 85 85 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
Congressional
Appropriation
^ '
Apportionment
V 13U, Month Approval/
LIOSe°Ut Issuance of 12th month ,,«.,, „„„,,,
Allotment ... Revised Keconcilia- „ rin«n,'t
" Artwiro nf tion ' LIOSBOUt
Carryover ,, Allowance
Distributioryi7 t k """
^J Rpvispd
1 Advice of
' ' \' 1 Allowancp
Advice of Carryover Change 1 f^
Allowance Advice of Request
Allowance Form —
^ ^ tf^
, Commitments, Obligations
H-
0<3
a
w
c
CL
09
fD
00
g
This is an example of the budget execution process, during which an Allowance Holder received a Carryover Allowance in
January and made only one change request during the year. That change request did not require OMB or Congressional
approval. Typically, however, Allowance Holders submit multiple change requests during the year and receive multiple
revisions to their Advices of Allowance.
I/ Allowance Holders must request Carryover funds by November.
oo o
t_n o
-------
Figure 5-2
OVERVIEW OF BUDGET EXECUTION PROCESSES
WITH OMB/CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL
Ul
LO
EPA
OFFICE OF THE
COMPTROLLER
12th Month
Reconcilia-
tion
Carryover
Advice of
Allowance
CO
o
c
i-i
n
n>
H-
3
TO
a.
3
OQ
3
PJ
This is an example of the budget execution process, during which an Allowance Holder received a Carryover Allowance
in January and made only one change request. That change request required Congressional and OMB approval. Typically,
Allowance Holders submit multiple change requests during the year and receive multiple revised Advices of Allowance.
I/ Allowance Holders must request Carryover funds by November.
00 O
Ln o
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
In addition, during the Current year other types of activities occur:
• By November, Allowance Holders must request the funds that
remained unobligated at the close of the previous fiscal
year that remain available to the Agency in the new fiscal
year. These funds are called Carryover Funds. The Office
of the Comptroller reviews the requests for Carryover Funds
and usually distributes Carryover funds beginning with the
December 1 Advices of Allowance.
• Periodic Management Reviews occur during the Current Year
to monitor performance commitments which were set just
prior to the start of the new fiscal year. Chapter 6
describes the management planning and accountability sys-
tems.
• As the fiscal year nears completion, the Budget Division
issues an end~of~year closing memorandum detailing the
dates for final changes to the Operating Plan. The
Financial Management Division issues the schedule for
closeout activities in the accounting system. An interim
"12th month" reconciliation is performed, followed by a
final "13th month" closeout, officially bringing the fiscal
year to a conclusion.
b. Definitions and Key Concepts
The purpose of this section is to briefly introduce key budget terms
and concepts used in the processes discussed in this chapter. The following
does not include terms and concepts introduced in previous chapters.
• Allotment Holder: The flow of fiscal responsibility at EPA
starts with the Office of the Comptroller. At EPA all
funds are apportioned by OMB to a single official, the
Comptroller who in turn gives one allotment to the Budget
Director, called the Allotment Holder, who is legally
accountable for assuring that obligations are made in
accordance with statutory requirements and that spending
authority is not exceeded. The single Agency allotment is
subdivided into Allowances, which are given to specific
Agency officials (Allowance Holders) to commit and obligate
specific portions of the Agency's Operating Plan. Advices
of Allowance are issued by the Office of the Comptroller in
order to inform Allowance Holders of the resources in their
Allowances. The Allowance Holders are responsible for
staying within the FTE ceilings and fund ceilings specified
on the Advices of Allowance.
5-4
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Allowances: Allowances are issued by appropriation and are
derived from EPA's Operating Plan which specifies the work-
years and dollars available for each program element and
object class by fiscal quarter. If Allowance Holders have
jurisdiction over activities funded by multiple appropria-
tions, they hold multiple allowances. For example, many
Allowance Holders have a Salaries and Expenses (S&E)
allowance and an Abatement, Control, and Compliance (AC&C)
allowance. Within this framework, the Assistant Adminis-
trators have jurisdiction over multiple Allowance Holders
and are designated Responsible Planning and Implementation
Officers (RPIOs) for their organizational areas. Although
Regional Administrators do not oversee multiple allowance
holders they are still RPIOs. The RPIOs are responsible
for implementing operating plans, controlling resource
ceilings, and reviewing programs. Each RPIO is also an
Allowance Holder.
There are two categories of allowances: New Obligation
Authority (NOA) and Carryover Authority. New Obligation
Authority is based on the six Congressional Appropriations
which are newly funded each year:
Salaries and Expenses (S&E)
Abatement, Control and Compliance (AC&C)
Superfund
Research and Development (R&D)
Construction Grants
Buildings and Facilities (B&F)
Carryover Authority: Carryover Authority is granted to
spend unobligated balances remaining in multi-year appro-
priations. For five of the six appropriations, (all but
the S&E appropriation), funds that are unobligated at the
end of a fiscal year potentially can be carried over to the
next year. Those funds are called "carryover" funds. In
addition to the Appropriations providing new obligation
authority, there are carryover balances for each prior
appropriation which has not expired. Therefore, for
example, an Allowance Holder could have Allowances for
Superfund (NOA) and Superfund (Carryover).
Different appropriations have different limitations in
their carryover funds. The Research and Development (R&D)
appropriation and the Abatement, Control and Compliance
(AC&C) appropriations are "two-year" appropriations, which
means funds may be carried over only once. For example,
R&D funds originally appropriated for FY85 but not obli-
gated in FY 85 are still available for obligation in
5-5
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
FY 86 — in other words, they can be "carried over" to FY
86. However, they cannot be carried over to FY 87. Any
portion of these funds that remains unobligated at the end
of FY 86 "lapse" or expire and are returned to the U.S.
Treasury. The Buildings and Facilities, Construction
Grant, and Superfund Appropriations are examples of "no-
year" appropriations, because these funds may carry over
indefinitely until they are obligated or rescinded.
Advices of Allowance: Advices of Allowance are the
Agency's principle funds control mechanism to ensure that
Allowance Holders are allocated resources according to the
Operating Plan, and that changes in the Plan are consistent
with limitations on the reprogramming funds within the
Agency. An Advice of Allowance is a document that the
Budget Division issues to each Allowance Holder. The first
Advice of Allowance is sent to Allowance Holders on October
1 of the new fiscal year. The Advice of Allowance speci-
fies the resources (dollars and workyears) that are avail-
able to the Allowance Holder at the program element level
for each quarter. In reviewing obligations based on the
Advice of Allowance, the Budget Division is concerned not
only about whether an Allowance holder exceeds the
Allowance but also reviews whether the Allowance Holder
exceeds the planned allocation for each program element
within the allowance. Revised Advices of Allowance are
issued whenever a change to the Allowance has been made.
Usually, revised Advices of Allowance are issued no more
than monthly but may be issued more frequently if neces-
sary. An example of an Advice of Allowance is shown in
Figure 5-3.
Continuing Resolution: The events described in Chapter 5
are based on the assumption that Congress is timely in its
passage of the EPA Appropriations Bill. If Congress has
not passed the Appropriations Bill by October 1st, they
must pass a continuing resolution in order to prevent the
Agency from having to shut down operations. If a con-
tinuing resolution is passed, Congress will generally
indicate that the Agency should begin to operate on a
certain percentage of a prescribed budget level. Under a
continuing resolution the Office of the Comptroller issues
Advices of Allowance based on the prescribed percentage of
the total funds available for obligation. For more details
on how the Agency operates when Congress passes a con-
tinuing resolution, refer to Policy and Procedure Memo #3.
5-6
-------
Figure 5-3
EXAMPLE OF AN ADVICE OF ALLOWANCE
1 ADVICE Of ALLOWANCE
Identifies the 4 'AL.UWANCE RECIPIENT (ALLOW NO.ICHNG NO.I FY i TYPE OF FUNDS
Allowance Holder 'DIRECTOR U-S*K« i 01 M«»a KX> nt>- OBLIG AUTM- _j
'OFFICf OF ADMINISTRATION '_ ' ' _'( ) CPUT"*CT AUTHORITY
i26 KEST ST. CLMR ST. IAPPROP STKBOL i TITLE K ) PRIOR YEAR FUNOS^^***!
ICIN1CINN»TIr OHIO ' ,, „, I _r-
I4SZ6K I68«CZOO «*1 ""• |
'QUARTERLY DISTRIBUTION (CURRENT A«TI CHANCE «/- (REVISED AMT CUMUL AMT
I 1
'1ST OTR. i.750.6001 Tl«,«00 J,«TO,000 I, 470,000
'2ND OTR. 3, OBJ, tOOl 202,100 2,325,700 S,7«S,roO
IJRD OTR. 1,653,7001 -3") ,100 1,492,600 7,286,300
>4TH OTR. 1,667,1001 -500,400 1,166,700 6,435,000
i_ i
i TOTAL e,3n,oooi 120,000 6,455.000 6,455,000
i - i
iREF. TO ATTACHED STIPULATION(S) NO.
i_ ^ ^ -1^--1—
'REMARKS
~
NO RESOURCES OR NORKYEARS CONTAINED IN THESE ALLOWANCES, FOR THE
SALARIES AND EXPENSES APPROPRIATION, MAY SE USED FOR ANY SUPERFUNO
tCTIVlTIESi LIKCMISE, NO RESOURCES OR HOR'YEARS IN THE ALLOWANCES FOR
' THE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE RESPONSE TRUST FUND, NAY BE USED FOR OTHER THAN
SIJPERFUND ACTIVITIES.
»u RESOURCES MAY BE TRANSFERRED FROM/TO ANY PROGRAM ELEMENT WITHOUT
, PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER.
' PFTE CURRENT CHANGE (REVISED! TOTFTE CURRENT! CHANGE REVISED
.1ST OTR. 27. « 4 28.3 1ST OTR. 33.1 7 33.6
2ND OTR. 20. » 4 21.3 2ND OTH. 25.0 7 25.7
•3RO OTR. 18.6 5 |9.l 3RD OTB. 22.0 6 22.8
:«TH OTR. U.9 5 j7. « HTM OTB. 20.0 • 20.8
; ....TAL 64.3 1.* 86.1 TOTAL 10/yl 3.0 10J.1
1 OvERCElLlNC HORKYEAR8 (APPROVED EFFEt^T^VEM //NOV 01, 1983— (
; (CURRENT (CHANGE IREVISEIXSIGNATUPE jl / 1 I/}// 1 DATE
.TOTAL 1 1 (1 f Mf> ±JA(ll» ^Ll 1 /0 1 /83
Identifies the Source
of Funds of the Allowance —
^P"X Obligation Authority from
the Salaries and Expenses
(S&E) Appropriation.
h Informs Allowance Holder
of increase or decrease
from the previous Allowance
and the quarterly totals in
the Allowance.
^-Identifies the media totals
of the dollar resources in
this Allowance.
]
\ — ^ 'Quarterly allocation
J of PFTEs and TOTFTEs
Advice of Allowance
tt)
en
o
i-!
o
ro
3
H-
00
to
D
W
O-
00
H-
00
P?
OO O
Ul O
-------
Figure 5-3 (continued)
EXAMPLE OF
APPROVED OPERATING PLAN BY ALLOWANCE HOLDER AND PROGRAM ELEMENT
00
11-01-83
UNITED MATES ENVI COrOENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPROVED OPERATING PLAN
AH 52 OIR-tOMINI3TRATION/CINN BY ALLOWANCE HOLDERS
SALARIES »ND EXPENSES (84-NOA)
PROGRAM SUB-ELEMENT 1984 OPERATING
OTSI <5"B2 OTR3 OTR4 T7T=4
NUMBER TITLE SICCO It 000 $1000 S1000 1'CCO
A30S5A PERS S ORG SERVICES 113.7 87.6 77.1 70.1 3-0.5
A3RSSA CONTRACTS GRNTS MGMT 318.1 248.3 222.1 204.6 9'3.1
A3VSSA FAC « MGT SERVICES 375.8 284.4 250.5 227.7 1.138.4
A3WS5A INFO SYS 4 SERVICES 221.0 167.5 147.4 134.0 6-9.9
TOTAL AGENCY MANAGEMENT 1,030.6 787.8 697.1 636.4 3.1"1.9
A40X5A HD09S SUPPORT SERV 2,439.4 1.537.9 795.5 530.3 5.3:3.1
TOTAL SUPPORT COSTS 2.439.J 1.537.9 7S5.5 530.3 5.3-'3.1
TOTAL SALARIES AND EXPENSES (84-NOA) 3, -170.0 2,325.7 1,492.6 1.166.7 8.4-5.0
PU-225
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
RMIS A-6
4-52K4
PLAN
OC FTE PFTE OPFTE TOTFTE
10.8 3.1 13.9
24.1 4.9 29.0
34.1 4.3 38.4
17.1 4.7 21.8
86.1 17.0 103.1
86.1 17.0 103.1
11-01-83
REPORT A-6
cn
O
c
l-f
n
§
H-
3
OQ
ta
Cb
OP
n>
rt
H-
ro
oo o
01 o
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
Figure 5-3 (continued) 2/1/85
EXAMPLE OF EXPLANATION OF CHANGES TO THE ADVICE OF ALLOWANCE
U-01-83 EXPLANATION Of CHANGES TO THE ADVICE OF ALLOWANCES
ADJUSTMENTS TO 4-52K4, CHAN6E *01
PROGRAM " " ••••••J------•••—————————
ELEMENT 1ST OTR 2ND OTR JRO QTR 4TH OTR TOTAL
A4DX5A DOLLARS 669,400 212,100 -371,100 .5)0,400
PFT FTE
TOT FTE
OC FTE
•SUBTOTAL 689,400 212,100 -171,100 -530,400
DOLLARS
PFT FTE
TOT FTE
OC FTE
16-aooi THIS CHANCE REPROGRAMS FUNDS INTO THE FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS
TO HEET PROJECTED NEEDS IN THE HEADQUARTERS AND NATIONWIDE
SUPPORT ACCOUNTS TO FUND AGREEMENTS FOR NORKMENS COMPENSATION,
PARKLAWN COMPUTER SERVICES AND DIPS PAYROLLt
AJRS5A DOLLARS
PFT FTE 4455 i.f
TOT FTE 7 7 » 6 3.{>
OC FTE
•SUBTOTAL
DOLLARS
pfT FTE 4455 i.e
TOT FTE 7 7 8 « 3.0
OC FTE
16«4004 THIS CHANGE MOVES WORKYEARS AND FUNCTIONS FOR ANALYTICAL AND
OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES FROM THE IMMEDIATE OFFICE OF THE AA TO THE
LINE OPERATIONS WITHIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION. THIS RE-
PROGRAMMING HAS RECEIVED CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.
A3RS5A DOLLARS 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000
PFT FTE
TOT FTE
OC FTE
•SUBTOTAL 30*000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000
DOLLARS
PFT FTE
TOT FTE
OC FTE
16-4005 THIS CHANGE MOVES DOLLARS AND FUNCTIONS FOR ANALYTICAL AND
OVERSIGHT ACTIVJTES TRANSFERRED FROM THE IMMEDIATE OFFICE OF THE
AA TO THE LINE OPERATIONS WITHIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION.
THIS REPRQGRAMMING HAS RECEIVED CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.
••TOTAL DOLLARS 719,400 242,100 -341,100 .500,400 120,000
PFT FTE 4455 1.8
TOT FTE 7 T « 8 3.0
OC FTE
5-9
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• Resources Management Information System (RMIS): RMIS is an
automated system managed by the Office of the Comptroller.
It contains the data base for the budgeting process from
the formulation phase through budget execution and directly
supports the following activities:
Development of detailed budget data for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and the President's
Budget;
Development of the EPA Operating Plan; and
— Maintenance and monitoring of the Operating Plan,
editing during the Change Request Process and pro-
duction of the Advices of Allowance.
During the Current Year, RMIS maintains the revised
Operating Plan which reflects any changes made during the
month. In addition, using data from the Financial Manage-
ment System (FMS), computer Utilization Reports are run by
the Budget Division of the Office of the Comptroller in
order to compare commitment and obligation data by
Allowance Holder to the Operating Plan. For every
Allowance Holder, the monthly Utilization Report lists the
approved Operating Plan for each program element by object
class and the commitments and obligations charged against
them.
• Financial Management System (FMS)
The Financial Management System is maintained by the
Finance Division of the Office of the Comptroller. It
maintains records on Current year commitments, obligations
and disbursements, and supplies data to RMIS to produce the
monthly Utilization Report.
3. PLANNING AND BUDGETING ACTIVITIES FOR THE CURRENT YEAR
a. Commitments and Obligations of Funds
Allowance Holders have the authority to commit and obligate and dis-
burse funds from their allowances within the limitations imposed by Congress,
OMB, GAO or EPA management. The Office of the Comptroller reviews all commit-
ments and obligations to ensure that Allowance Holders do not inadvertantly
exceed the imposed limitations. As Allowance Holders begin committing and
obligating funds, each transaction is recorded in the automated Financial
Management System under the specific program element and object class account
code to which it relates. At the beginning of each fiscal year the Office of
the Comptroller distributes guidelines for "charging" items to the correct
5-10
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
RMIS object classes and appropriations. The memo also relates the RMIS object
class codes with the FMS codes. A copy of the memo for FY 85 is included in
Appendix F. In addition, the Financial Management Manual (Ch. 15, Appendix A)
provides detailed guidelines to Allowance Holders for committing, obligating
and disbursing funds. Figure 5-4 presents a crosswalk between RMIS and FMS
object class codes. Figure 5-5 lists the object classes that are allowable
for each appropriation.
b. Charging to the Correct Appropriation
Under Federal financial management guidelines, as costs or expenses
occur during the current year, Allowance Holders must "charge" the correct
appropriation and object class. This is a multi-step process, the first step
of which is to determine the correct object class to which a particular cost
must be charged. In order to do this, Allowance Holders must first determine
the purpose or use of the cost or service. Then, using the Financial
Management Manual they will determine which object classes are appropriate.
For example, if a headquarters EPA employee travels to a Region to discuss
SPMS commitments, the Allowance Holder must determine to which object class
the air fare should be charged. FMS object class code 2113 is "Common
Carrier" and this code appears to be the appropriate one.
Once having determined the correct object class codes, the next step
is to determine the correct appropriation. Using the chart labelled, "Allow-
able Object Classes and Program Elements by Appropriation," the Allowance
Holder determines that only the Salaries and Expenses, Building and Facil-
ities, and the Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund (Superfund) appropri-
ations allow charges to FMS object class 2113. Understanding that the purpose
of the business is administrative, and using the definition found in Chapter 2
of this manual, it becomes clear that the correct appropriation is the
Salaries and Expenses Appropriation.
The final step is to determine the correct program element against
which to charge the cost of transportation to a Region. Using the program
element definitions in Appendix D, the Allowance Holder determines that,
because SPMS comes under the Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation, the
correct program element is AGRS5A, Program Management Policy, Policy and
Evaluation - Salaries and Expenses.
There may be an occasion when the correct object class or appro-
priation is not easily determined or, similarly, when a cost could legiti-
mately be charged to more than one appropriation. The Government Accounting
Office (GAO) in its document, "Principles of Federal Appropriations Law"
states:
RULE: Where either of two appropriations may reason-
ably be construed as available for expenditures not
specifically mentioned under either appropriation, the
determination of the agency as to which of the two
5-11
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
appropriations to use will not be questioned. How-
ever, once the election has been made, the continued
use of the appropriation selected to the exclusion of
any other for the same purpose is required, in the
absence of changes in the appropriation acts....
In 59 Comp. Gen. 518 (1980), the Environmental
Protection Agency received separate lump-sum appro-
priations for "Research and Development" and "Abate-
ment and Control." The contract in question, entered
into in 1975, could arguably have been charged to
either appropriation, but EPA had elected to charge it
to Research and Development. Applying the above rule,
the Comptroller General concluded that a 1979 modifi-
cation to the contract had to be charged to Research
and Development funds, and that the Abatement and
Control appropriation could not be used.
Thus, in this type of situation (two appropriations,
both arguably available, neither of which specifies
the object in question), the agency may make an
initial election as to which appropriation to use.
However, once it has made that election and has in
fact used the selected appropriation, it cannot
thereafter, because of insufficient funds in the
selected appropriation or for other reasons, change
its election and use the other appropriation.
5-12
-------
Figure 5-4
CROSSWALK BETWEEN RMIS AND FMS OBJECT CLASS CODES
Ln
I
RMIS OBJECT CLASS
PERSONNEL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
planned obligations for salaries, wages (gross
compensation), and fringe benefits for personal
services rendered to the Government by its
Officers, or employees, either civil or uniformed,
and compensation for services rendered by
consultants (employed on a per diem or fee basis
only). Planned dollars for former personnel
should also be included.
RMIS
CODE
41
FMS
CODES
11 .00
11 .01
11.12
11.13
11.19
11.31
11 .34
11 .35
11 .39
11.51
11.52
11.53
11.54
11.55
11.56
11.57
11.58
11.59
11.60
11.61
11.62
11.63
11.64
11.65
11.70
11.71
11.72
11.73
11.74
11.75
11.76
11.81
11.82
12.00
12.10
12.11
12.12
12.13
12.14
12.15
12.16
12.17
12.18
12.21
12.22
12.23
12.24
12.25
12.26
12.27
12.28
12.30
FMS TITLE
Personnel Compensation
Jury Duty Fees
Perm FT, Civ Oth Thn Wage Brd
Per FT, Civ. Wage Brd
Lump Sum Terminal Leav-Civ.
Experts & Consultnts, (OPFT)
Temporary Civilian (OPFT)
St Tme, Non Clg Erap, GW WW, YV
Pers Srvcs, Civ, All Otr (COPFT)
Overtime Pay, PFT
Night Differential
Overtime OPFTE
Foreign Post Differential, Civ.
Hazardous Duty Pay-Civilian
Sunday Pay
Holiday Pay
Overtime Pay, Non Ceiling Empl
Other Pay-Civilian
Performance Awards - Merit Pay
Cash Awards
Performance Awards
Meritorious Executive Awards
Distinguished Exec Awards
Other Personnel Comp
Base Pay, Comm Corps-IPA
Base Pay, Comm Officers (PFT)
Qtrs And Subsistence Comm O
Other Pay-Comm 0
Lump Sum Terminal Lv-Comm 0
Qtrs. & Subs, Comm. Officers (Non-Ceiling)
Other Pay, Comm Officers (Non-Ceiling)
Special Personal Svc Payment
Intergovernmental Personnel Act
Personnel Benefits
Social Security-FICA (PFT)
Retirement Contribution (PFT)
Insurance (FEGLI) Contrib (PFT)
Health Benefits Contr (PFT)
Foreign Allow, Civ. (PFT)
Non-Frgn Allow, Civ (COLA)
Uniform Allow-Civ
Perm Change Station Ben-Civ
Other Personnel Benefits, Civ (PFT)
Insurance Contr ib-(SGLI ) Comm. Officers
Social Sec Contr .-FICA-Com 0
Foreign Al lowances-Comm
Non Foreign Allow, (COLA)-Com
Perm Change Sta Ben-Comm O
Otr Personnel Be-Coram 0
Soc. Sec. (FICA) Comm Officers (Non-Ceiling)
Other Pers. Ben. Comm Officers (Non-Ceiling)
Social Sec (FICA) Con, Cv (OPFT)
CD
CO
O
c
l-(
n
fD
03
§
H-
3
00
03
3
O.
W
G.
00
TO
3
OQ
03
N3
I— N3
-^ -P-
oo o
l_n O
-------
Figure 5-4 (continued)
CROSSWALK BETWEEN RMIS AND FMS OBJECT CLASS CODES
Ul
RMIS OBJECT CLASS
PERSONNEL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS (cont'd)
TRAVEL & TRANSPORTATION OF PERSONS
Planned obligations for transportation of
Government employees or others, their per diem
allowance while in an authorized travel status,
and other expenses incident to travel which are
to be paid by the Government either directly or
jy reimbursing the traveler both for travel
away from and in and around permanent duty
station and for rentals of passenger vehicles
from Government motor pools.
TRANSPORTATION OF THINGS
Planned obligations for the transportation of
things and for care of such things while in
process of being transported, including postage
used in parcel post, rental of trucks and other
transportation equipment, and reimbursements to
Government personnel for the authorized movement
of household effects or house trailers.
RENT, COMMUNICATIONS AND UTILITIES
Rent — Planned obligations for the rental of
land, structures or equipment (other than
transportation equipment), not agency owned.
Also included are Standard Level User Charges
(SLUG) assessed by the General Services
Administration for the rental of space and
related services.
RMIS
CODE
41 (cont
42
43
44
FMS
CODES
•d) 12.31
12.32
12.33
12.34
12.35
12.36
12.38
12.40
12.41
12.42
12.43
12.44
12.45
12.46
12.48
13.00
13.01
UA7
. U£
21.00
21.11
21.13
21.14
21.15
21.16
21.17
21.91
21.97
21.98
22.00
22.06
22.09
22.11
22.12
22.13
22.18
22.92
22.93
22.97
23.00
23.01
23.02
23.03
23.04
23.05
23.06
23.07
23.08
23.09
FMS TITLE
Retirement Contrib (OPFT)
Insurance (Fegli) Contr (OPFT)
Health Benefits Cont (OPFT)
Foreign Allow Civ. (OPFT)
Non-Foreign Allow Civ (COLA) OPFT
Uniform Allow Civ (OPFT)
Other Personnel Allow, Cv (OPFT)
Soc Sec Contr. Civ Non-Clg Emp
Retirement Con Non-Clg Empl
Insurance Contr, Non-Clg Empl
Health Ben Con, Non-Clg Empl
Foreign Allow, Civ, Non-Ceiling Em
Non-Foreign Allow, Civ (Cola), Nclg
Uniform Allow, Civ., Non-Clg
Other Personnel Ben, Civ (Non-Ceiling)
Benefits for Former Personnel
Severance Pay
Travel & Trans of Persons
Per Diem & Subsistence-All Other
Common Carrier
Privately Owned Vehicle
Commercial Rental
GSA Car Rental
Incidental Costs
Local Travel
Prompt Pay Int Penalty
Vehicle Charge Back
Transportation of Things
Non-Passenger Vehicle Rent
Transportation of Things ($100 or less)
Messenger hf Or Courier Svcs
Tran & Care of Thgs (over $100)
Transp. of Things Cap. Prop. Freight in
Equip, (over $1,000)
PCS Transfer of Effects
Relocation of Offices
Relocation & Redist of Property
Prompt Pay Int Penalty
Rent Coon & Utilities
Land & Structures
ADP Software Packages
ADP Software Sys & Equip
Telecommunication Equip
Word Processing Rental
Demurrage on Gas Cylinders
Rental of Other Equipment
Rental of Photocopy Equipment
Data Processing Facilities
(D
o>
o
l-i
o
(D
03
3
H-
s
TO
(B
a
TO
a>
it
H-
TO
3
CO
fO
00 O
Oi O
-------
Figure 5-4 (continued)
CROSSWALK BETWEEN RMIS AND FMS OBJECT CLASS CODES
RMIS OBJECT CLASS
Communications — Planned obligations for the
transmission of messages from place to place, such
as contractual charges for land telegraph service,
telephone and teletype services; charges for
postage (other than parcel post); contractual
messenger service; and rental of post office
boxes, postage meter machines, mailing machines,
and teletype equipment.
Utilit ies — Planned obligations for heat, light,
power, water, gas, electricity and other utility
services exclusive of transportation and
mnunication service.
PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION
Planned obligations for contractual printing and
reproduction, and the related composition and
binding operations performed by the Government
Printing Office, other agencies or other units
of the same agency (on a reimbursable basis),
and commercial printers. Includes all common
processes of duplicating and standard forms
when specifically printed or assembled to order,
and printed envelopes and letterheads.
OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Planned obligations for all contractual services
not otherwise classified. Included are management
and administrative contracts, such as contracts
for repairs and alterations, subsistence and
support of persons, stenographic services,
publication of notices, advertising and radio
broadcast time, tuition, fees and other charges,
operation of facilities or other service contracts.
RMIS
CODE
45
46
FMS
CODES
23.10
23.11
23.13
23.14
23.15
23.20
23.25
23.27
23.97
23.98
24.00
24.01
24.02
24.97
25.00
25.24
25.25
25.26
25.29
25.36
25.37
25.38
25.40
25.44
25.45
25.46
25.47
25.49
25.50
25.51
25.80
25.81
25.82
25.97
25.98
FMS TITLE
Standard level User Charges
Local Telephone Service
Long Distance Service
FTS Service
Telephone Installation
Ut ility Services
Penalty Mail
Other Communicat ions
Prompt Pay Int Penalty
Mailcharge
Printing and Reproduction
Printing and Reproduction of Informational
Materials
Federal Register Printing
Prompt Pay Int. Penalty
Other Contractual Services
Maint Word Proc Equipment
Repair & Alter-Bldgs & Grounds
Management & Support Contracts
Word Processing Typing Service Cts
Aircraft Maintenance
Health Units
Security Investigations
Advert ising
Registration and Other Fees
Training
Occ Health & Safety Training
Occup. Health Monitoring
Occup. Health & Safe Ser-Other
Custodial Services
Legal Services - Court Cases
Storage Household Goods
Moving and/or Labor Services
Facil Maintenance & Oper Exp
Prompt Pay Int Penalty
Off Equip Maint-Chargeback
n>
en
o
PJ
§
H-
3
OQ
to
3
CL
bd
CL
OQ
H-
3
00
to
3
to
ho
i—1 ho
-^ -P-
CO O
Ln o
-------
Figure 5-4 (continued)
CROSSWALK BETWEEN RI-1IS AND FMS OBJECT CLASS CODES
RMIS
RMIS OBJECT CLASS
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
'lanned obligations for commodities whether
acquired by formal contract or other form of
purchase which are (a) ordinarily consumed or
expended within one year after they are put
into use, (b) converted in the process of
construction or manufacture, or (c) used to
form a minor part of equipment or fixed
property.
5QUIPMENT
Planned obligations for personal property of a more
or less durable nature — that is, which may be
expected to have a period of service of one year
or more after being put into use without material
impairment of its physical condition. It includes
charges for service in connection with initial
installation or reinstallat ion of equipment when
jerformed under contract.
.AND AND STRUCTURES
'1 armed obligations for land and interest in land,
>uildings and other structures, additions to
Building, nonstructural improvements, and fixed
equipment (whether an addition or replacement),
when acquired through purchase.
CODE
47
48
49
FMS
CODES
26.00
26.01
26.02
26.03
26.04
26.05
26.06
26.07
26.08
26.10
26.11
26.97
26.98
31.00
31.01
31.02
31.03
31.06
31.07
31.08
31.09
31.10
31.11
31.12
31.14
31.15
31.16
31.80
31.90
31.97
32.00
32.01
32.02
32.03
32.51
FMS TITLE
Supplies & Materials
Laboratory Supplies
Office & Admin, Supplies
Subscript ions
ADP Supplies
Maintenance Supplies
Prot Equipment & Clothing
ADP Software Package
Fuel Supplies
Other Supplies & Materials
Off-The-Shelf Print & Audio Products
Prompt Pay Int Penalty
Stores-Charge Back
Equipment
Scientific and Technical Equipment Valued
more than $1,000
Furniture and Office Equipment Valued more
than $1 ,000
Purchase of all ADP-related Equipment Valued
more than $1 ,000
Prot. Equipment and Clothing — Personal
Valued more than $1,000
Scientific and Technical Equipment $1,000
or less
Furniture Office Equipment Valued $1,000 or
less
Purchase of ADP-related Equipment Valued
$1,000 or less
Protective Equipment and Clothing - Personal
Valued $1 ,000 or less
Word Processing Equipment Valued $1,000 or
less
Dictation & Transcription Eqmt . Valued
$1 ,000 or less
Word Processing Equipment Valued more than
$1,000
Books
Dictation and Transacript ion Equipment more
than $1,000
Other Equip. Valued more than $1,000
Other Equip. Valued $1,000 or less
Prompt Pay Int. Penalty
Lands & Structures
Land
Buildings & Other Structures
ADP Facilities
Construction In Progress
(D
CO
o
c
l-i
o
(D
TJ
M
£0
3
3
H-
TO
a
w
TO
(D
3
TO
3
00 O
t_n o
-------
Figure 5-4 (continued)
CROSSWALK BETWEEN RMIS AND FMS OBJECT CLASS CODES
I
I—»
^•J
RMIS OBJECT CLASS
INSURANCE CLAIMS AND INDEMNITIES
Payments for claims on life and marine insurance
policies. Includes annuities paid from trust funds
to former employees in addition to indemnities for
destruction or injury of persons or property.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTS
Contracts involving systematic study directed toward
fuller scientific knowledge or understanding of the
subject studies. This includes research or the
systematic use of knowledge gained from research ,
directed toward the production of useful materials,
devices, systems or methods including design and
development of prototypes and processes. Research
aay include either basic or applied research.
)evelopment also includes, but is not limited to:
of samples, monitoring activities that aid in the
development of new and improved sampling and
analytical methods, review of research documents
evaluation of technical outputs, preparation of
manuals and handbooks, and conduct of seminars
and workshops. Also included are demonstration
activities that are part of research or development,
i.e., they are intended to prove or to test whether
a technology or method works.
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENTS
Planned obligations for contracts and agreements
between EPA and another Federal agency or agencies
in which EPA transfers funds to the agency or
agencies. Specifically excludes payments made to
other agencies for services of civilian and
military personnel on reimbursable detail.
Distinction between this and other Agency personnel
working under an IAG also excludes charges for
contractual services in connection with the
operation of health facilities.
PROGRAM CONTRACTS
'lanned obligations for contracts which support
program operations. Included in this category are
contracts for the preparation of Environmental
Lrapact Statements, for the development of
regulations, standards, guidelines and criteria,
for monitoring, for surveillance and analysis,
for pesticides certification, for regional
RMIS
CODE
50
60
61
62
FMS
CODES
42.00
42.01
25.32
25.70
25.71
25.72
25.73
25.74
25.75
25.76
25.77
25.78
25.79
25.33
25.35
FMS TITLE
Insur Claims & Indemnities
Insur Claims & Indemnities
R&D Contracts
Intergovernmental Agreements
Research IAG
Demonstration IAG
ADP and Information SpflAG
Admin. Mgrat Svcs IAG
Policy and Regulatory Standards and
Development IAG
Site Supervision and Development
Survey and Monitoring IAG
Emerg. Svcs to Other IAG
Other Misc. IAG
Cont. for Consultant Services
Program Contracts
CO
o
C
n
n
(D
h- >
Bi
CB
a.
w
CL
OQ
(D
3
cw
rO
1— ho
-C-
00 O
Ui O
-------
Figure 5-4 (continued)
CROSSWALK BETWEEN RMIS AND FMS OBJECT CLASS CODES
I
I—"
CO
RMIS OBJECT CLASS
•
and analyses of programs. Management,
included in this category.
ADP CONTRACT SERVICES
Planned obligations for contracts to provide
system analysis design and programming services,
repair and maintenance of data processing
equipment, ADP/telecommunicat ion services such
as keypunching/verifying, ADP studies, advice
consulting services not otherwise reported.
Includes payment for direct ADP costs only.
ADP costs within program or research and
development contracts should be charged to
FMS object classes 25.32 (R&D Contracts) and
25.35 (Program Contracts).
RESEARCH GRANTS
non-governmental organizations and individuals in
designed to identify causes, effects, extents,
prevention and control of environmental pollution.
DEMONSTRATION GRANTS
Planned obligations for awards to governmental
and non-governmental organizations and individuals
in support of projects designed to demonstrate new
or improved techniques to enhance environmental
control .
GRANTS TO STATE, INTERSTATE, AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS (PROGRAM GRANTS)
Planned obligations for awards to State,
interstate, or local government agencies to
aid them in the planning, management, development,
or implementation of environmental pollution
programs.
RMIS
CODE
63
70
71
72
FMS
CODES
25.13
25.14
25.16
25.17
25.18
25.19
25.20
25.21
25.23
25.27
25.96
41.41
41.42
41.45
41.00
41.10
41.11
41.12
41.16
41.17
41.18
41.19
41.20
41.51
41.55
FMS TITLE
ADP Contracts Redesign and Enhancement
Feasibility Studies
ADP User and Operational Support and
Facility Management Contracts
Telecommunication Services
Timesharing Services
Incid. ADP Oper. Supp.
Maintenance Data Proc. Equip.
Evaluation and Analysis Studies
ADP Contracts for the Development of Net
System
Other ADP Contracting Services
Reimbursable Timeshare Dist.
Research Grants
Research and Dev. Coop. Agreements
Demonstration Grants
Grants Subsidies & Contrib
Environ Prot Consolidation Grants
Program-Spt .
Construction Grants for Wastewter Treatment
Works
Air Poll Control Prog Grants
Ct Lakes Pollutn Control Grants
Water Pollut Control Pro Grants
Pub Water System Super/St Grants
Underground Water Source Protection Grant
Safe Drinking Water Act
Area-Wide Planning Grants
Basin Planning Grants
CO
o
l-t
o
CD
O
3
H-
3
09
CL
a
00
fD
3
OQ
tu
K)
I-1 N5
~-- -P-
c» o
t_n O
-------
Figure 5-4 (continued)
CROSSWALK BETWEEN RMIS AND FMS OBJECT CLASS CODES
RMIS OBJECT CLASS
GRANTS TO STATE, INTERSTATE, AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS (PROGRAM GRANTS) (cont'd)
OTHER GRANTS (FELLOWSHIPS, TRAINING)
Training Grants — Planned obligations for awards
to State and local government agencies and to
educational institutions for the purpose of
developing and conducting training programs for
the education of personnel in the field of
abatement and control of environmental pollution.
RMIS
CODE
72 (cont
FMS
CODES
'd) 41.57
41.61
73
41.63
41.81
41.83
41.84
41.85
41.21
41.25
FMS TITLE
Solid-Hazard Wst Mg Prsup Gr
Pest Program Grants
Toxic Subs Program Grants
Env Const Gts-Spec Purpose
Invest ig, Surveys or Studies
Asbestos Hazards Abatement (Schools)
Assistance Grants
Superfund - Remedial Planning and
Implementation
Training Grants
Fel lowships
CO
o
»-!
o
(D
(U
3
H?
3
TO
to
3
CL
to
C
Q*
TO
n>
3
CD
g
Cu
00 O
Ln O
-------
Figure 5-5
ALLOWABLE OBJECT CLASSES AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS BY APPROPRIATION
NJ
O
APPROPRIATION!/
(A) SALARIES AND EXPENSES 6850200 (FY85)
CHARGEABLE
RMIS CODE
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
50
63
CHARGEABLE
FMS CODE
11.00-11.99
12.00-12.99
13.00-13.99
21.00-21.99
22.00-22.99
23.00-23.99
24.00-24.99
25.24-25.26
25.29
25.36-25.38
25.40
25.44-25.47
25.49-25.51
25.80-25.82
25.97, 25.98
26.00-26.99
31.00-31.99
42.01
25.13-25.14
25.16-25.21
25.23
25.27
25.96
CHARGEABLE PROGRAM ELEMENT
ALL PROGRAM ELEMENTS EXCEPT FOR THOSE
PROGRAM ELEMENTS IN THE MANAGEMENT AND
SUPPORT MEDIA; ALL REIMBURSABLE PROGRAM
ELEMENTS .
FOR THOSE PROGRAM ELEMENTS IN THE MANAGEMENT
AND SUPPORT MEDIA AND ALL REIMBURSABLE
PROGRAM ELEMENTS - ALL RMIS & FMS CODES
EXCEPT LAND AND STRUCTURES (RMIS-49; FMS-
32.00-32.99) ARE ACCEPTABLE AGAINST THE
SALARIES 4 EXPENSES APPROPRIATION. CHARGES
TO THE LAND AND STRUCTURES OBJECT CLASS IN
THIS APPROPRIATION REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER AND THE
FACILITIES AND SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION.
CHARGES TO THIS OBJECT CLASS ARE APPROPRIATE
IN THE BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES APPROPRIA-
TION AND ONLY BY EXCEPTION IN THIS APPRO-
PRIATION.
70
o
n
ro
3
H?
3
OQ
W
CL
OP
ro
3
(K3
03
03
-Appropriations are defined in Chapter 2.
OO
to
-C-
O
O
-------
Figure 5-5 (continued)
ALLOWABLE OBJECT CLASSES AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS BY APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION!/
(B) ABATEMENT CONTROL AND 685/60108
COMPLIANCE (NOA)
(J) ABATEMENT AND CONTROL 684/50108, 68X0108
(CARRYOVER)
(P) NO YEAR ABATEMENT, CONTROL 68X0108
AND COMPLIANCE (NOA)
CHARGEABLE
RMIS CODE
60
61
62
70
71
72
73
CHARGEABLE
FMS CODE
25.32
25.70
25.33, 25.35
41.41, 41.42
41.45
41.10-41.12
41.16-41.21
41.51
41.55
41.57
41.61
41.63
41.81
41.83
41.25
41.21
41.25
CHARGEABLE PROGRAM ELEMENT
ALL PROGRAM ELEMENTS EXCEPT THOSE CITED
BELOW.
FOR THE FOLLOWING PROGRAM ELEMENTS - ALL
RMIS & FMS CODES ARE ACCEPTABLE AGAINST
ABATEMENT, CONTROL, & COMPLIANCE APPRO-
PRIATION WHEN APPROVAL FOR CHARGES IS
OBTAINED THROUGH THE OFFICE OF THE
COMPTROLLER. IN THE FOLLOWING STATE GRANT
PROGRAM ELEMENTS, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
CAN INCUR INTRAMURAL CHARGES IF A STATE
DOES NOT ACCEPT DELEGATION OF THE RESPEC-
TIVE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS. THIS STIPU-
LATION IS AUTHORIZED UNDER FIFRA, SDWA,
AND RCRA.
B65C2C - PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS SUPR. PROG.
GRANTS
B66C2C - UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL
PROG. GRANTS
B77D2C - HAZ. WST. MGT. FIN. ASS'T. TO
STATES
B8XE3A - PESTICIDES CERTIFICATION &
TRAINING
BFJE3A - PESTICIDES ENFORCEMENT GRANTS
IN THE FOLLOWING PROGRAM ELEMENT, THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN INCUR INTRAMURAL
CHARGES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AS
PROVIDED FOR IN THE ASBESTOS SCHOOL
HAZARDOUS ABATEMENT ACT OF 1984.
JMSL2C - ASBESTOS IN-SCHOOLS ABATEMENT
LOAN & GRANTS
W
o
c
l-i
o
n>
03
3
K-
3
OO
03
Cd
Cb
OQ
(D
3
TO
3
03
— Appropriations are defined in Chapter 2.
K3
OO O
Ul O
-------
Figure 5-5 (continued)
ALLOWABLE OBJECT CLASSES AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS BY APPROPRIATION
Ol
NJ
NS
WPROPRIATIONjL./
(C) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 685/60107
(NO A)
(K) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 684/50107, 68X0107,
(CARRYOVER) 68X0109
(M) ENERGY, RESEARCH AND 68X0109
DEVELOPMENT (CARRYOVER)
CHARGEABLE
RMIS CODE
60
61
62
70
71
72
73
CHARGEABLE
FMS CODE CHARGEABLE PROGRAM ELEMENT
25.32
25.70
25.33
25.35
41.41-41.42
41.45
41.10-41.12
41.16-41.20
41.51
41.55
41.57
41.61
41.63
41.81
41.21
41.25
— Appropriations are defined in Chapter 2.
CO
o
c
o
fD
<-3
M
(U
3
H-
3
OQ
to
3
W
D-
OQ
(D
3
OQ
g
to
oo o
l_n O
-------
Figure 5-5 (continued)
ALLOWABLE OBJECT CLASSES AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS BY APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION
(T) HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
RESPONSE TRUST FUND
(SUPERFUND - NOA)
(S) (CARRYOVER)
6820X81*5
CHARGEABLE
RMIS CODE
CHARGEABLE
FMS CODE
CHARGEABLE PROGRAM ELEMENT
ALL RMIS AND FMS ARE ACCEPTABLE AGAINST THE NEW OBLIGATION AUTHORITY
(NOA) HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE RESPONSE TRUST FUND APPROPRIATION.
ALL RMIS AND FMS CODES ARE ACCEPTABLE; HOWEVER, THE OFFICE OF THE
COMPTROLLER WILL NOT ALLOW CHARGES TO THE FOLLOWING OBJECT CLASSES
WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THAT OFFICE.
41 11.00-11.99
12.00-12.99
13.00-13.99
42 21.00-21.99
Ul
I
(D
CO
o
C
ft
o
fD
0>
3
H-
3
00
D.
09
(D
OQ
03
O
C
03
to
•^ -P-
co o
ui o
-------
Figure 5-5 (continued)
ALLOWABLE OBJECT CLASSES AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS BY APPROPRIATION
i
ho
APPROPRIATION
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CEILING
CHARGEABLE
RMIS CODE
41
42
43
44
45
47
48
50
11
12
13
21
22
23
24
26
31
42
CHARGEABLE
FMS CODE CHARGEABLE PROGRAM ELEMENT
00-11.99 FOR YOUR INFORMATION, THOSE FMS AND RMIS
00-12.99 OBJECT CLASSES INCLUDED UNDER THE
00-13.99 LEGALLY-MANDATED ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
CEILING ARE LISTED. THIS CEILING APPLIES TO
00-21.99 CARRYOVER AS WELL.
00-22.99
00-23.99
00-24.99
00-26.99
00-31.99
01
en
o
c
l-(
o
fD
O
TO
CU
W
O.
TO
H-
TO
3
p>
to
(— N3
-~, -P-
oo o
Ln O
-------
I
NJ
Figure 5-5 (continued)
ALLOWABLE OBJECT CLASSES AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS BY APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION
(0) BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES 68X0110
(NOA AND CARRYOVER)
(N) BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES 68X0110
(CARRYOVER)
(I) SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OVERSEAS
(H) OPERATIONS, RESEARCH AND 68X0100
FACILITIES
CHARGEABLE
RMIS CODE
CHARGEABLE
FMS CODE
CHARGEABLE PROGRAM ELEMENT
ALL RMIS AND FMS CODES ARE ACCEPTABLE EXCEPT:
41 11.00-11.99
12.00-12.99
13.00-13.99
n>
en
o
c
>~t
n
n>
3
3
M.«
3
00
g.
Cb
oo
3
05
3
(0
N5
H- K>
^— *-
CO O
(ji O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
c. Changes and Reprogrammings
When the Current Year begins and it becomes necessary to change the
Operating Plan, Allowance Holders initiate change requests to reprogram funds
from one account to another in the Operating Plan. These requests, submitted
on Form OP-2B, are submitted to the Budget Division where they are reviewed
for budgetary and programmatic impact and to determine if the change exceeds
Congressional, OMB, or Agency limitations. Figure 5-6 is a copy of Form
OP-2B.
If Congressional or OMB approval is required, the reprogramming is
held while Office of the Comptroller sends the request with the necessary
justification to the appropriate officials. If approved, Office of the
Comptroller moves ahead to process the action.
The types of actions for which an Allowance Holder submits a Change
Request include but are not limited to the following:
• A proposed transfer from one Allowance Holder to another.
• A proposed transfer from one program element to another.
• A proposed transfer affecting either the "personnel compen-
sation and benefits" (PC & B) object class or the,"travel"
object class.
All change requests must be approved, and the Allowance Holder must
be issued a. new Advice of Allowance before any funds nay be committed or
obligated based on the reprogramming. In addition, Allowance Holders should
cover any outstanding commitments before transferring funds from an account.
They should round up to the nearest hundred dollars and should provide for
adequate lead time before the proposed date on which the change will take
effect.
Allowance Holders may transfer FTEs within an allowance but should
also transfer funds to support them. Allowance Holders may not use more
workyears than the Budget Division has authorized for their allowances. The
Budget Division allocates FTEs by program element and notifies Allowances
Holders of their FTE allocation in the Advice of Allowance.
d. Limitations on Changes
Each year Congress, OMB and senior EPA management may place limita-
tions on EPA's appropriations. To explain those limitations, a cover letter
is attached to the first Advice of Allowance sent to the Allowance Holders.
Examples of the type of limitations on an Allowance Holder are:
• The Agency's limitation on transferring funds between
Appropriat ions;
5-26
-------
Figure 5-6
EXAMPLE OF FORM OP 2-B
Ul
i
K3
CHANGE REQUEST/NOTIFICATION - POSITICWFTE s-\ &&*-
BOD USE ONLY
ORtG CHANGENO.
3$ ^® ( lo
TO:
Office of Resources Management (PM-225)
Tudor Davis, Director, OMEP
ijO^CHANGE REQUEST
f~] NOTIFICATION
10/18/84
FORM OP-ZB
PAGE
1 °" 1
EFFECTIVE DATE OF
REPROGRAMMING
ASAP
SF
;u
7
5
5
P.E. NUMBER
ft- 14
AFPC3A
A49B2D
AH
LU
LD
R
15-16
87
87
RC
17
I. ~
AA
PU
PT
RH
B-19
HA
CA
LCL
20-21
'.<•'
Al
CO
TN
22
C
c
oc
BL
J
23-24
26
26
ALL ENTRIES MUST INCLUDE ONE DECIMAL
ENTERED IN COLUMNS Z» • 14.
21 PFT (*nd of Quarter)
22 PFT Ifar BOD UM only)
23 OPFT f«nd of ouarter)
26 PFTE
27 OPFTE
CURRENT FY QUARTERS
FIRST
33 - 40
-
+
2
2
SECOND
41-48
+
3
3
THIRD
49-56
+
~«tfrt?'
^^vs
2
2
$
V
FOUR TM
57-64
-
-T
' '^' *, r "\ *.
V^
v
3
3
CURRENT YEAR
TOTAL
FY 85
1
•f 1
0
0
BUDGET YEAR
TOTAL
FY
65-72
This action transfers FTE and supporting dollars between
program elements to reflect the organizational reassignment
of an individual pursuant to the Office of Water's reorganization.
EPA Form 2410-2OA (R*». 4-80) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE.
n>
CD
o
i-i
o
(B
3
3
H-
3
OQ
W
CL
OQ
fD
3
00
3
OJ
K3
CO O
ui o
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• An Allowance Holder's restriction on reprogramming funds out
of PC&B without prior approval of Congress; and,
• Reprogramming between program elements within a change
request for more than $500,000 for the House and $1,000,000
for the Senate requires prior approval from the
Congressional Subcommittee for Appropriations.
In specific years there may be additional limitations on certain
programs; or, there might be some exception to the standard limitations. The
applicable limitations are described in detail in the letter accompanying the
first Advice of Allowance in October 1 of the new fiscal year and are deter-
mined directly from the Appropriation Bill language.
e. Requesting Carryover Funds
A detailed description of the processes for requesting and allocating
carryover funds is the subject of Policy and Procedure Memo M. In brief
summary, during the first 45 days of the new fiscal year, the Office of the
Comptroller will:
• Determine and validate the total carryover funds from the
preceding fiscal year;
• Determine the portion of the carryover funds which is
committed, reserved, or uncommitted/unreserved;
• Identify, with the assistance of Program and Regional
Offices, any and all of the previously approved, planned
uses of these funds;
• Review prior fiscal year performance versus the operating
plan for each Allowance Holder at the program level; and,
• Solicit carryover requests from the Program and Regional
Offices in the form of change requests (Form OP-2B) with
justification.
A change request form is required for committed, reserved, and uncom-
mitted/unreserved carryover as a means of formalizing what has been requested
and providing the necessary data input codes to grant requests.
In the beginning of the fiscal year, a cutoff date for carryover
requests will be established and the Office of the Comptroller will review
these submissions in terms of fund availability, critical needs, and Agency
priorities. First priority will be given to reissuance of committed and
reserved carryover funds to the original Allowance Holder whenever ample
justification is provided. To the extent that carryover funds exceed the
amounts justified for use by the original Allowance Holder, they will be used
5-28
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
to fund other proposed Agency priorities. Some requests may require a
decision by the Administrator. Until funds are specifically provided in
Allowances or by memorandum from the Comptroller, no funds will be obligated
by Allowance Holders in any carryover appropriation accounts. Refer to Policy
and Procedure Memorandum #4 for more details on carryover funds.
f. Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund (Superfund)
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) was signed into law on December 11, 1980. The Act created the
Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund, also known as Superfund. During the
summer of 1981, the first delegations were issued and they relied heavily on
Headquarters control to assure consistency in the implementation of the new
program.
The program is now over three years old and the Agency has gained
significant experience in operating the Superfund program. The Regions in
particular, have had to deal with the hazardous waste problem on a first-hand
basis and are now ready to assume considerable authority in pursuing program
objectives. Therefore, where possible, authorities to take specific actions
are being delegated to the Regional Offices.
Under the Superfund delegations approved April 16, 1984, the Regional
Offices have additional authority and responsibilities for significant
portions of the remedial program. This includes both programmatic and
administrative authority and responsibilities, described in detail in the
various Superfund remedial program guidance packages, and specific financial
management authority, responsibilities and procedures described in this
document.
Regional financial management authority consists of three distinct,
but interrelated, parts: approval, commitment and obligation (award).
Authority to approve remedial activities is contained in the Superfund dele-
gations package. In general, Regional approval authority under the remedial
program will include all direct response activities except Records of Decision
(ROD).
Funding authority will be contained in the Regions' allowances, which
will provide funding for the following remedial program mechanisms:
• Remedial planning activities under REM/FIT and REM-II
• Cooperative Agreements (CA)
• Designated Interagency Agreements (IAG)
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lAGs for technical
assistance (RI/FS and design)
5-29
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
U.S. Array Corps of Engineers lAGs for remedial design
and implementation
U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) lAGs
for permanent relocation (allocation transfer)
Other Federal agencies as appropriate (site-specific
only).
In accordance with Federal acquisition regulations, all contract
obligations will be made by the Procurement and Contracts Management Division
(PCMD) in Headquarters. The remedial program's Cooperative Agreement obliga-
tion authority is delegated in the Superfund delegations package (delegations
14-4-A and 14-4-C); IAG award authority has been delegated elsewhere (delega-
tion 1-11). FEMA allocation transfer lAGs must be processed through the
Office of the Comptroller, Budget Division and FMD Headquarters Financial
Reports and Analysis Branch.
Starting October 1, 1984, each Regional Office will be issued an
allowance by the Office of the Comptroller to be used to fund remedial activ-
ities. The Regions will request annual remedial funding in their Superfund
accomplishments plan, which will be broken out by quarter. The approved
accomplishment plan will determine the amount of the annual allowance, and the
quarterly allocations of that allowance. The allowance will be issued as
follows:
• October 1 for first and second quarters
• March 1 for third quarter
• June 1 for fourth quarter.
End of fiscal year adjustments may be necessary to accommodate unforeseen
events. In addition, Headquarters will maintain a contingency reserve to fund
unanticipated actions.
Regions must manage and control their allowances in accordance with
Agency directives, e.g., Accounting Manual. Headquarters will provide assis-
tance and oversight as required.
g. Supplemental Appropriations
Supplemental Appropriations are requests for funds in excess of the
initial Appropriations Bill passed by Congress. If necessary, the Adminis-
trator may request that the President submit a supplemental appropriation to
Congress. Only the President can request funds from Congress. Requests are
very often based on national environmental concerns over unexpected major
environmental crises or increased needs as the result of authorization
changes. When Congress passes a Supplemental appropriation, it usually
contains funds for several agencies. The EPA funds within a Supplemental
Appropriation are designated for one of EPA's regular Appropriations (e.g.,
5-30
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Superfund). When Congress passes a Supplemental Appropriation, the Office of
the Comptroller provides the additional funds to the allowance holders via
Advices of Allowance. Generally, the supplemental process, barring a
disaster, or some extraordinary event, is cumbersome. Historically, EPA has
received supplemental late in the Fiscal Year.
h. Performance Tracking
During the Current Year, performance is monitored against performance
goals that were estimated in the Budget Formulation and Budget Review phases,
and also against budgetary goals and constraints. As the Current Year
progresses, performance against the targets is reported quarterly and, where
appropriate, corrections and adjustments can be made. Quarterly Performance
Reviews are conducted with the Assistant Administrators to discuss national
performance against the national goals.
The Action Tracking System (ATS), administered by Office of
Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE), provides bi-weekly tracking of
Headquarters program performance commitments. The Deputy Administrator and
the Assistant Administrators (AAs) meet on a bi-weekly basis to check the
progress of actions which are due during the previous two weeks and, where
delays are apparent, to resolve the discrepancies. In addition to the
bi-weekly and quarterly reviews conducted through OMSE, there is a mid-year
budget review by the Office of the Comptroller to evaluate the use of Agency
workyears and dollars.
Chapter 7 discusses the Agency's performance accountability systems
in more detail.
4. OVERVIEW OF PLAYERS AND ROLES
The following is a brief overview of the roles of key players in executing
the budget. For convenience, Exhibit 5-7 summarizes the roles of the key
players.
a. Assistant Administrators and their Subordinate Managers and Staff
During the Budget Execution phase, each Assistant Administrator (AA)
is both a Responsible Planning and Implementation Officer (RPIO) and an
Allowance Holder. Many of an AA's subordinate program managers (e.g., Office
Directors) also are Allowance Holders.
As an RPIO, the AA is responsible for overseeing the execution of
allowances by his or her subordinate Allowance Holders. In addition, if any
of the subordinate Allowance Holders wants to submit a request for a
reprogramming (i.e., an adjustment of a Advice of Allowance) the RPIO's Senior
Budget Officer (SBO) has the authority and responsibility to review the change
request first, and to decide whether it should be submitted to the Budget
5-31
-------
Figure 5-7
SUMMARY OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
s?
CO
o
H
o
(D
Assistant Administrators/National
Program Managers
(Assisted by their Program Managers
and Senior Budget Officers)
Act as Responsible Planning and Implementation Officer and Allowance Holder
Request reprogramming
Monitor and evaluate program performance
Regional Administrators
(Assisted by their Program Managers
and their Management Division
Director or Assistant Regional
Administrator for Management)
Act as Responsible Planning and Implementation Officer and Allowance Holder
oversee execution of allowances
Monitor and evaluate Regional performance — develop SPMS Quarterly Reports
w
O-
OQ
(D
rt
H-
3
00
Office of the Comptroller
(Budget Division)
Issues Advices of Allowance
Distributes Carryover funds
Reviews change requests/reprogrammings for budget and programmatic impact and seeks
Congressional or other approval if required
Works with OMSE on assuring consistency between the budget and performance goals
Office of Management
Systems and Evaluation (OMSE)
Maintains Action Tracking System
Coordinates SPMS Quarterly Reviews
Oversees ad hoc Management Reviews
Administrator and
Deputy Administrator
Act as RPIOs and Allowance Holders
Review program performance against planned objectives
May become involved with major reprogrammings, or may initiate reprogrammings based
on changes in Agency direction
Initiate Agency's requests for Supplemental Appropriations
NJ
oo o
Ui O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Division for further consideration. In performing these responsibilities, the
Assistant Administrators, in their role as RPIOs, typically rely heavily on
their Senior Budget Officers.
As part of their Budget Execution responsibilities, Assistant
Administrators also play a major role in tracking and evaluating performance.
For example, for SPMS evaluation, Assistant Administrators meet with the
Administrator or Deputy Administrator on a regular basis.
b. Regional Administrators and their Subordinate Managers and Staff
Each Regional Administrator is both an RPIO and an Allowance Holder.
As RPIOs, Regional Administrators are responsible for overseeing the execution
of their allowances, and for reviewing change requests before they are sent to
the Office of the Comptroller. As an Allowance Holder, a Regional Administra-
tor also may initiate a reprogramming (change request). In carrying out his
or her responsibilities, a Regional Administrator typically depends heavily on
one individual who serves essentially as a chief budget officer. In many
Regions, this individual is the Management Division Director.
Regional Administrators also play a lead role in tracking current
year performance of key Regional Office managers, and in leading the Regions
participation SPMS reviews and other performance evaluation by Senior Agency
Management.
c. The Office of the Comptroller
The Budget Division of the Office of the Comptroller is the control
center for most Budget Execution activities. The Budget Division starts the
Current Year by issuing Advices of Allowance to Allowance Holders, based on
the new obligation authority made available under Congressional appropria-
tions. Early in the fiscal year, the Budget Division closes out the previous
fiscal year operating plan which, in part, entails a final determination of
available carryover authority for the new fiscal year. The Budget Division
takes the lead in coordinating the process for deciding how carryover-spending
authority should be allocated among the Allowance Holders; The Budget Division
then issues Advices of Allowance for this spending authority. In developing
the Advices of Allowance (both for new obligational authority and for carry-
over), one of the Budget Division's key responsibilities is to be cognizant of
applicable restrictions and limitations on the spending authority that are set
by Congress, OMB, and EPA's Administrator.
During the Current Year, the Budget Division is responsible for
reviewing obligations, advising Allowance Holders of actual or potential
deviations from Operating Plan, and recommending appropriate solutions to
correct problems. As part of this activity, it is essential for RPIOs,
Allowance Holders, Senior Budget Officers and Regional budget staff to com-
municate and coordinate regularly with their counterparts in the Budget
Division.
5-33
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
During the Current Year, the Budget Division is also responsible for
reviewing all budget reprogrammings submitted by Allowance Holders. If the
change request does not require OMB or Congressional review, the Budget
Division has the authority to approve or deny the request; in other cases, a
decision by the Administrator or Deputy Administrator is required. Once all
required approvals are obtained (this may take several months for change
requests that are subject to Congressional review), the Budget Division is
responsible for issuing a revised Advice of Allowance.
d. Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE)
OMSE is responsible for maintaining the Strategic Planning and
Management system (SPMS). As part of the Current Year activities, OMSE
coordinates the quarterly reviews, which are an integral part of SPMS. More
generally, OMSE helps the Administrator and Deputy Administrator use SPMS as
an accountability tool. OMSE also maintains and coordinates the Action
Tracking System (ATS), a mechanism primarily for tracking Headquarter's regu-
lation development activities and assignments, significant policy documents,
and responses to court deadlines.
e. Administrator and Deputy Administrator (A/DA)
The Deputy Administrator acts as the RPIO for the resources allocated
to finance the activities of the immediate office of the Administrator, and
both the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator are Allowance Holders.
However, beyond their direct stewardship of these relatively minor amounts of
resources, the Administrator and Deputy Administrator do not have much
day-to-day involvement in the execution of EPA's budget. The primary Current
Year responsibilities of the Administrator/Deputy Administrator related to
Budget Execution include the following:
• Throughout the Current Year, the Administrator and the
Deputy Administrator review performance against planned
objectives. The Administrator and Deputy Administrator
play a major role in evaluating current performance and in
formulating solutions to performance discrepancies or
shortcomings.
• At their discretion, the Administrator or Deputy Admini-
strator may become involved in deciding on major reprogram-
mings during the Current Year. For example, the Adminis-
trator or Deputy Administrator may review major
reprogramming proposals and may direct the Office of the
Comptroller whether to proceed or not. In other cases, the
Administrator or Deputy Administrator may initiate the call
for a reprogramming, for example, as a means of ensuring
the timely implementation of a major change in policy
during the Current Year.
5-34
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
The Administrator or Deputy Administrator always initiate
any Agency request for Supplemental Appropriations.
5-35
-------
6. A-76
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 6 - PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES
This chapter was revised June 4, 1984 with circulation through normal
distribution.
Copies of this revised Chapter 6, the OMB Circular No. A-76 (Revised)
dated August 4, 1983 — "Performance of Commercial Activities," OMB's A-76
Supplement and "A Guide for Writing and Administering Performance Statements
of Work for Service Contracts" issued by the Office of Federal Procurement
Policy are available from EPA's Distribution Center.
6-1
-------
7. MGMT. ACCOUNTABILITY
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 7 - ACCOUNTING FOR PROGRAM PERFORMANCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION/SUBSECTION SECTION/SUBSECTION
TITLES NUMBERS
Purpose 1
Overview 2
Strategic Planning and Management System 2.a
Definitions and Key Concepts 2.b
Major Components of the Strategic Planning and
Management System 3
Agency Operating Guidance 3.a
Goals, Objectives, Commitments, Measures 3.b
SPMS Quarterly Reports 3.c
Management Reviews 3.d
Action Tracking System 3.e
Overview of Players and Roles 4
Assistant Administrators 4.a
Regional Administrators 4.b
Office of the Comptroller 4.c
Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSK) 4.d
Administrator and Deputy Administrator 4.e
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring 4.f
FIGURE FIGURE
TITLES NUMBERS
Schedule of Major Activities 7-1
Excerpt from a GOCM Document 7-2
Excerpt from a Quarterly Report 7-3
Summary of Roles and Responsibilities 7-4
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 7 - ACCOUNTING FOR PROGRAM PERFORMANCE
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of Chapter 7 is to describe EPA's Strategic Planning and
Management System and to relate it to the planning and budgeting process.
2. OVERVIEW
a. EPA's Strategic Planning and Management System
In the past, the Agency has not had a formal, continuing process for
examining the longer-term strategic implications for current program deci-
sions. Agency planning had been focused on the short-term decisions required
for budget and Operating Plan preparation. Recently, the Agency adopted a
revised approach to strategic management. The new approach is designed to
buttress the basic management philosophy that relies heavily on decentralizing
operational responsibility to the Regions and to the states. In order to
implement and maintain an effective decentralized approach, it was necessary
to develop a strong accountability system which included integrated planning,
implementation and oversight, and which would provide a broader focus for
federal-state cooperation in environmental management.
In January, 1984, EPA instituted the Strategic Planning and Manage-
ment System (SPMS), which was designed to encompass all the elements of an
effective strategic planning system. SPMS replaced the Administrator's Man-
agement Accountability System (AMAS) by enlarging the scope of oversight and
accountability. The Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE) has
primary responsibility for overseeing SPMS and its components; however, every
manager carries the responsibility for planning and articulating program goals
and for assuring that those goals are implemented correctly. The major com-
ponents of SPMS include the following:
• Agency Operating Guidance with Agency Priority List is the
first piece of the system (SPMS) which contains strategies
identifying each program's mission, goals, objectives, and
performance measures;
• The document entitled "Goals, Objectives, Commitments and
Measures" (GOCM), published each October reiterates the
goals, objectives and measures defined by the Agency Guid-
ance and, in addition, articulates quantitative commit-
ments;
• The SPMS Quarterly Reports, for the most part, focus on
national progress against national goals and, in many
7-1
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
areas, provide information on Regional and State per-
formance against goals, thereby providing integrated
management planning for the Agency;
• Quarterly Meetings with Assistant Administrators and Semi-
Annual Visits with Regions provide the Deputy Administrator
an opportunity to comprehensively review program perfor-
mance as reflected in the quarterly reports at both the
National and Regional level (State environmental directors
are often included); and evaluations are undertaken when
the reasons for significant slippages in performance are
not readily apparent;
• Management Reviews are ad hoc reviews or evaluations of
situations that have been identified as impeding the prog-
ress of Agency goals; and,
• The Action Tracking System (ATS), monitored on a bi-weekly
basis, supports SPMS and primarily monitors Headquarters
responsibilities and progress on priority actions .such as
regulations and standards, significant policy documents,
and responses to court deadlines. The Deputy Administrator
meets biweekly with Headquarters senior managers to resolve
problems and keep things moving.
Figure 7-1 illustrates the schedule of major activities in these EPA
management processes.
In relating the budget process to these management processes, it
should be noted that the focal point of the budget process establishes
realistic resource targets while the focal point of the strategic planning and
performance management process establishes performance goals (or targets).
Therefore, in relating the two processes, the resource targets must be related
to performance targets. Ideally, the activities for which resource targets
are set in the planning and budgeting process are the same activities for
which performance is measured or evaluated. The effectiveness of strategic
planning will depend upon the extent to which the activities are consistent
from budget formulation through budget execution and the extent to which
priorities listed in the Agency Guidance are reflected in the allocation of
resources. Section 3 of this chapter will discuss the four components of the
SPMS and explain their relationship to the budget process.
b. Definitions and Key Concepts
The purpose of this section is to briefly introduce key terms and
definitions used in this chapter. Other definitions are evident from the text
and do not require separate definition.
7-2
-------
Figure 7—1
SCHEDULE OF MAJOR ACTIVITIES
1. Issue Regional EMRs for
coming FY
2. Revise Agency Priority L
List
3. Issue Agency Operating j_
Guidance
4. Negotiate SPMs
Commitments
5. Produce GOCM
6. Issue Quarterly SPMS
Reports and meet with AAs
1- Visit Regions i_
(semi -annually)
Briefings (26 bi-weekly)
OCT
\
A
\
A
NOV
A
^
DEC
QUARTERLY
.-H REPORTS
L_l/^
JAN
J
i
FEB
L
QUARTERLY
/ REPORTS
k
THROUGH-OUT
BI-WEEKLY
MARCH
GUIDANCE
'LT>
^
j
THE YEAR
MEETINGS
APRIL
I
OCCUR
MAY
A
1 QUARTERLY
/ REPORTS
/^
L
WITH THE
JUNE
^
J
DEPUTY
JULY
\
I
ADMINISTRA
AUG
GOCM
L
FOUARTERLY
/ REPORTS
A-^"
k
OR
SEPT
A
A.
A
J
A
A
n>
en
o
c
1-i
o
CD
H-
3
TO
s
CL
09
n>
rt
H-
3
TO
3
to
3
03
I
UJ
KEY:
= Document prepared by OMSE
in coordination with
program offices
A = Initiation of Process
A = Termination of Process
to
00 o
Ln O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
• Goals: When used in the context of SPMS, goals are general
descriptions of specific Agency priorities. For example, a goal
may be "increase reclamation activities."
• Measures: When used in the context of SPMS, measures are the
means by which the goals are evaluated. Continuing the above
example, a measure might be "the number of RCRA permits to be
issued."
• Commitment: When used in the context of SPMS, commitments are
quantitative amounts or numbers. For example, if the goal is to
increase reclamation activities and the measure is the number of
RCRA permits, then, the goal is "to issue 200 RCRA permits; an
increase of 50 from last year)."
3. Major Strategic Planning and Management System Components
a. Agency Operating Guidance
The Agency Operating Guidance document, published each February, has
evolved over time from two documents — the Administrator's Guidance and pro-
gram guidance — and combines the Agency's general goals with specific pro-
grammatic goals and measures. The Guidance is considered by the Administrator
to be the keystone of EPA's system to manage environmental improvement. It is
designed to provide a framework that can be used to plan and execute environ-
mental programs for two years. The Guidance is published in February and is
directed to the Operating Year and the Budget Year. For example, the Agency
Guidance published in February, 1985 lists specific priorities and program
goals for FY86. It also contains general guidance and direction for FY87.
The activities contained in the Guidance provide a framework for Agency pro-
gram accountability measures and for managers' performance standards during
the coming year. These, in turn serve as a basis for establishing mutual
commitments and evaluation measures for Headquarters, the Regions, and the
States as part of the SPMS oversight and accountability system. The process
for developing the Agency Guidance is found in Chapter 3, Section 3.
b. Goals, Objectives, Commitments, and Measures (GOCM)
(1) Description
This document is published before each fiscal year. It contains
specific quantitative measures and commitments which relate to qualitative
goals promulgated by the Administrator in the Agency Guidance. For example,
the Administrator's goal may be, "Strengthen Risk Assessment and Risk Manage-
ment and Promote Flexible Regulatory Approaches." One of the objectives
towards meeting that goal may be to "Evaluate the need to regulate potentially
toxic air pollutants, recommend appropriate control option(s), and announce
results to the public." The success of meeting the goal may be measured by
the number of decisions about what constitutes potentially toxic air
7-4
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
pollutants. The commitment that the program office has made to meet the
objective may be to"make four major decisions on potentially toxic air
pollutants by mid year." Also included in the GOCM document is the frequency
with which the commitments are tracked, whether quarterly, semi-annually or
annually. Figure 7-2 contains an excerpt from the GOCM document.
(2) Relation to the Budget Process
The "Goals, Objectives, Commitments and Measures" document pro-
vides the standards against which program office performance is tracked during
the Current Year. The amount of financial resources a program commits, obli-
gates and disburses may be considered an important indicator of performance.
This activity may therefore appear as an SPMS commitment in the GOCM document.
However, the GOCM document is not directly related to the budget process
except insofar as the goals, objectives, commitments and measures that the
document tracks are based on the activities in the Agency Operating Guidance
which, in turn, are based on budgeted activities identified in the BUD 2
submission. OMSE is responsible for tracking progress (or .lack thereof) on
performance issues. The Office of the Comptroller tracks financial commit-
ments, obligations and disbursements but does not specifically relate dis-
bursements to the standards of performance defined in the GOCM.
c. SPMS Quarterly Reports/Reviews
(1) Description
Another component of the overall Strategic Planning and Manage-
ment System is the SPMS Quarterly Reports. These Quarterly Reports reflect
the status of national progress against national goals for each program area.
In many cases, the Quarterly Reports provide information on regional and state
performance against goals. The activities identified in the Quarterly Reports
reflect the goals, commitments and measures which were originally reflected in
both the Agency Operating Guidance and the GOCM. Corresponding to the
issuance of the Quarterly Reports, the Deputy Administrator meets with the
Assistant Administrators to discuss performance-to-date and ways in which
performance could be improved. The Quarterly Reports form the basis of dis-
cussion for the Quarterly Review meetings with the Assistant Administrators
and the semi-annual visits with the Regions and, where possible, with the
State Environmental Directors. The Quarterly Reports track actual performance
versus planned and committed targets. An excerpt from a quarterly report is
found in Figure 7-3.
(2) Relation to the Budget Process
The SPMS Quarterly Reports reflect progress (or lack thereof) of
Regional performance against National goals. There is no formal connection to
the monthly budget review process conducted by the Office of the Comptroller.
Should an activity be severely behind schedule, the Deputy Administrator or
7-5
-------
Figure 7-2
EXCERPT FROM "GOALS, OBJECTIVES, COMMITMENTS AND MEASURES"
ro
CO
o
c
i-i
n
T)
H-1
i
H-
3
OQ-
CX
bd
ex
3
TO
Administrator's Goal; Meet Program Cai...-troents with Maximum Efficiency
and Effectiveness
Program Area; Air, Noise and Radiation
OBJECTIVE
COMMITMENT
MAS CODE
Complete ackninistrative actions on
the 1982 ozone/CO SIP submittals and
initiate program to monitor
implementation of comnitments.*
OftNR
Complete review and processing of Federal
Register notices for final and reproposed
actions (excluding sanctions actions) by
3/1/84.
Complete by 5/1/84 review and processing of
federal Register notices for proposed
sanctions actions sutmitted by 12/31/83.
Complete review and processing of Federal
Register notices for final actions on SIP
reproposals (excluding sanctions actions) by
9/30/84.
Regions
Submit to OANR by 12/31/83 Federal Register
notices for final or reproposed actions.
Submit to QftNR by 7/31/84 Federal Register
notices for final action on reproposals.
A/H-8a
A/H-8b
A/H-8C
VR-2a
VR-2b
REPORTING
FREQUENCY
.0 2
0 3
0 4
0 1
0 4
'Contingent on final policy to
be issued by September 30,
1983, not being substantially
Modified
UANR-3
CX3 O
Ul O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
Figure .7-3
EXCERPT FROh QUARTERLY REPORT
2/1/85
MEETING PROGRAM COMMITMENTS
PERCENT OF SIP REVISIONS PROCESSED ON TIME
O NATIONALLY, THE SIP ON-TIME PROCESSING RATE DECLINED FROM 91» AT THE
BEGINNING OP THE YEAR TO 83% AT THE END Of THE YEAR.
O MOST REGIONS ARE PROCESSING MORE THAN 90% OF THEIR SIP ACTIONS
WITHIN THE ALLOTTED FIVE MONTH TARGET. THE MAJOR PROBLEM APPEARS
TO LIE WITH HEADQUARTERS.
O DECLINING HEADQUARTERS PERFORMANCE WAS THE RESULT OF A GROWING
BACKLOG OF SIPS WITH UNRESOLVED POLICY ISSUES.
- NINETEEN OF THE 36 LATE SIPS AT HEADQUARTERS ARE BEING HELD
AWAITING MAJOR POLICY DECISIONS OR SETTLEMENT OF THE NRDC NEW
SOURCE REVIEW LAWSUIT.
- ELEVEN OF THE LATE SIPS NOW APPEAR TO BE MAKING SATISFACTORY PROGRESS
THROUGH FINAL REVIEW.
- THE REMAINING SIX LATE SIPS NEED RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES UY
PROGRAM OFFICES.
PERCENT OF SIP REVISIONS
PROCESSED ON TIME
As Of September 30.1983
100-iO
75-
50-
UROCT
NATIONAL
25-
|SIP» IN PROCESS: 315
2 3
QUARTERS
354 320
283
Legend
IZZ HEADQUARTERS ( TARGET - 2 MOS. )
•I REGIONS ( TARGET - 5 MOS. )
7-7
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
OMSE may consult the budget staff to determine the budget status of that acti-
vity. The converse may also occur; that an activity which is under- or over-
obligating as compared to the plans will draw the attention of the Office of
the Comptroller, who may in turn check with OMSE. However, there is no built-
in mechanism for comparing planned performance with planned dollars.
d. Quarterly Meetings with Assistant Administrators and Semi-Annual
Visits with Regions
(1) Description
Management Reviews are conducted on an ad hoc basis to evaluate
problematic situations and recommend solutions to the problems that have been
identified through the ATS or SPMS Quarterly Reviews. The Management Reviews
are conducted by a team of analysts from OMSE, the program office and other
involved offices. They are carried out at the request of OMSE, the Admin-
istrator or Deputy Administrator or the program office with the identified
problem. The purpose of the Management Review is to remove any "stumbling
blocks" which may impede progress in meeting Agency goals.
The Management Review team takes a approximately six weeks to
review the issues and develop recommended actions to resolve any problems.
The recommended solutions are applied in one of several ways. If the program
office has been the initiator in requesting the review and seeking solution,
then the program office may implement the recommendation of the Management
Review team with little delay. If there is disagreement between the program
office and the review team, the Assistant Administrator or the Deputy Admin-
istrator may become involved.
(2) Relation to the Budget Process
As with the other components of SPMS, Management Reviews are not
directly related to the Budget Process. The Management Review team, however,
may consult with the Office of the Comptroller to determine the financial
situation of the specific program office. Conversely, the Office of the
Comptroller may contact OMSE to draw to their attention unusual obligating
patterns.
e. The Action Tracking System
(1) Description
The Action Tracking System (ATS) was originally designed in
September, 1983 to complement the Administrator's Management Accountability
System (AMAS). Since the SPMS was instituted in January, 1984, the ATS has
become the one component of EPA's strategic planning process which specifi-
cally addresses the Headquarter's regulations, standards, policy, and guidance
7-8
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
development activities. The ATS was designed to alleviate the difficulty EPA
was experiencing in setting and meeting schedules for the development and
issuance of such documents.
The major purpose of the ATS is to provide information on the
status of the Agency's important regulation development activities in such a
way as to insure that EPA's work is flowing smoothly and being completed in a
timely way. The information from ATS is used as a basis for bi-weekly
meetings with the Deputy Administrator and the Assistant Administrators. The
purpose of the bi-weekly meetings is to check the progress of actions due
during the previous two weeks and, where delays are evident, to highlight and
resolve any problems.
It should be noted that not all activities are scheduled for
tracking; routine and non-critical tasks are not tracked in the Action Track-
ing System. However, in order to ensure that ATS accomplishes its major
purpose by providing timely status information on the Agency's important
activities, the Deputy Administrator expects the following time-sensitive
items to be tracked in ATS:
• Projects to develop or implement major new policy
decisions, such as Agency Task Forces.
• All significant regulations and standards. (This
would exclude minor procedural rules and small revi-
sions to existing standards.)
• Major direct assignments from the Administrator or
Deputy Administrator.
• Key integral products for another Assistant Adminis-
trator or Regional Administrator, the absence of which
impedes program implementation.
• Actions that are subject to statutory and/or court
ordered deadlines.
• Other items of particular interest to the Adminis-
trator or Deputy Administrator.
2. Process
The ATS reporting periods are two weeks in length. The period
begins on the first Saturday and ends on the second Friday. Within each
reporting period certain events must take place at a specified time in order
to maintain the system and produce the bi-weekly report for the Administrator/
Deputy Administrator's ATS meeting. The schedule is as follows:
7-9
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
Day
First Friday of the
Reporting Period
Second Friday of the
Reporting Period
First Monday following
the Reporting Period
First Tuesday following
the Reporting Period
First Wednesday
following the
Reporting Period
Action
The program offices identify the ATS items due
for reporting to OMSK during the current period.
The program offices report to OMSK the status of
each item listed on the due or late report.
OMSK updates the ATS data base and prepares the
ATS report based on the program office status
reports.
OMSK sends the ATS report to the Deputy Adminis-
trator and the program offices via electronic
mail.
The Assistant Administrators meet with the Admin-
istrator/Deputy Administrator to review the
status of projects reported on during the period.
(This meeting will generally be held on Thursday
unless otherwise notified.)
(3) Relation to the Budget Process
The Action Tracking System reflects progress (or lack thereof)
of critical Headquarters regulatory, guidance and policy development, and
research activities during the Current Year. The activities which are tracked
are reflective of the Headquarter's goals and objectives described in the
GOCM, and to the priorities outlined in the Agency Operating Guidance. There
is no direct correlation between oversight of the progress of the ATS
activities and oversight of the financial commitments, obligations, and
disbursements process.
4. Overview of Players and Roles
The following is a brief overview of the roles of various offices in
managing performance accountability. For convenience the following subsection
is summarized in Figure 7-4.
a. Assistant Administrators
One of the major roles of Assistant Administrator (AA) is the over-
sight and management of program performance; therefore the AAs play key roles
in all aspects of the SPMS. In September of each year, the AAs receive a
draft list of priority activities which will form the basis of the priorities
in the Agency Operating Guidance. The AAs meet with the Deputy Administrator,
National Governor's Association and other environmental and industry groups to
discuss the priorities. Based on that meeting, the Deputy Administrator
issues the final priority list; the AAs then develop operating guidance paying
7-10
-------
Figure 7-4
SUMMARY OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
8?
m
o
r!
O
(D
I
H-
3
00
P>
3
w
rt
H-
3
CW
3
(S
fu
Assistant Administrators
Help develop the Agency Priority List.
Contribute to the Agency Operating Guidance by writing their programs' goals.
Negotiate measures and commitments with Regions.
Develop Activities for Action Tracking System.
Regional Administrators
• Develop Regional Environmental Management Report.
• Help develop Agency Priority List.
• Involve State and local environmental groups in development of priorities.
Office of Comptroller
Work with OMSE to assure consistency between budgetary and performance goals.
Office of Management
Systems and Evaluation
Coordinate the process of developing the Agency Operating Guidance, the GOCM
report, activities for ATS and SPMS Quarterly Reports.
Evaluate performance goals for consistency with budgetary considerations.
Conduct Management Reviews as necessary.
Administrator and Deputy Administrator
• Monitor activities in ATS on bi-weekly basis.
• Conduct bi-annual trips to Regions.
• Conduct Quarterly SPMS Review meetings.
Jffice of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring
Analyze and report the enforcement and compliance portion of SPMS
NJ
NO
00 O
Ui O
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
special attention to the areas in the priority list. The operating guidance
includes programmatic goals, strategies for achieving the goals, and per-
formance measures for tracking success in meeting the goals. The AAs must
complete the operating guidance in time for the Deputy Administrator to issue
the Guidance in February. In late summer, the AAs begin negotiations with
Regions on commitments to the various measures which must be finalized by the
end of the fiscal year for the publication of the document "Goals, Objectives,
Commitments, and Measures" (GOCM) in which the States are responsible for
certain activities. The Regions must complete their negotiation with their
particular States in advance of their negotiations with the AAs. In addition,
by the beginning of the new fiscal year, the AAs must have coordinated with
the Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE) the activities which
will be tracked in the Action Tracking System. During the Current Year, the
AAs meet on a bi-weekly basis with the Deputy Administrator to discuss the
activities in the Action Tracking System and on a quarterly basis to discuss
national performance in the Strategic Planning and Management System.
b. Regional Administrators
One of the major roles of the Regional Administrators (RAs) is the
oversight and management of program performance in their Region; therefore,
the RAs also are key players in the SPMS. The RAs must develop the Regional
Environmental Management Reports which form the basis for the Agency Priority
List. In October of each year the RAs receive a draft list of the priority
activities which will form the basis of the priorities in the Agency Operating
Guidance. The RAs meet with the Deputy Administrator, the Assistant Adminis-
trators, the National Governor's Association and other environmental and
industry groups to discuss the priorities to be included in the Agency
Operating Guidance. The RAs also involve their State Environmental Directors
in the development and revisions of the Agency Guidance. Once the Agency
Operating Guidance is issued in February, the RAs continue working with the
State Environmental Directors to review and develop performance measures and
to make commitments against those measures. The role of the State
Environmental Director is increasing as more EPA programs are being delegated
to regions and to States. In late summer, RAs begin negotiating with Head-
quarters program offices on Regional commitments for the coming year. During
the Current year, the RAs meet with the Deputy Administrator on a semi-annual
basis to discuss performance in relation to SPMS goals.
The role of the Lead Regions in developing the goals, objectives,
commitments and measures is still evolving. OMSE anticipates that the role of
the Lead Region will be to coordinate Regional review of the commitments/
measures and to add Regional perspective to the objectives detailed in the
Agency Guidance.
c. The Office of the Comptroller
The Office of the Comptroller and OMSE work together in identifying
potential performance/financial problems. If the Office of the Comptroller
7-12
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
finds that an Allowance Holder appears to be obligating funds in a way that
does not seem to be consistent with the priorities of the Agency Guidance, the
Office of the Comptroller will bring the matter to the attention of OMSK.
Conversely, OMSE will work closely with the Office of the Comptroller to
assure that performance goals and budget goals are consistent.
d. The Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (OMSE)
OMSE operates and maintains the Strategic Planning and Management
System (SPMS). OMSE's principal responsibility is to ensure that SPMS
contains appropriate measures of program success and that program information
is analyzed and interpreted to top management so that they can take action as
necessary to meet EPA's goals. OMSE' s role has two major facets: 1) as the
process coordinator, assuring that the process flows smoothly and on schedule;
and 2) as program area specialists who can detect potential performance
problems and recommend solutions to correct the potential problems. In its
role as coordinator, OMSE is responsible for requesting, gathering, compiling
and distributing performance data. As program area experts, OMSE must be able
to determine whether performance goals are realistic, whether critical
activities have been omitted or inadequately addressed in the goal setting
process and whether or not problems identified in the ATS or SPMS Quarterly
Reports can be corrected by changing goals, or personnel, or management
strategies.
e. The Administrator/Deputy Administrator
The concept and initiative for the Strategic Planning and Management
System came from the Administrator and Deputy Administrator. The Administra-
tor and Deputy Administrator want to closely monitor current, actual perform-
ance against planned performance. Therefore, the Administrator and Deputy
Administrator play integral roles in the oversight and management of SPMS.
The Administrator and Deputy Administrator rteet with the AAs, RAs, State
Environmental Directors, and organizations and outside interest groups to
determine Agency directions to be defined in the Agency Operating Guidance.
They then meet on a bi-weekly or quarterly basis with the AAs; and semi-
annually with the RAs and, to the extent possible, with the State Environ-
mental Directors to discuss actual progress versus planned progress.
f. The Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring (OECM)
OECM has responsibility for analyzing and reporting the enforcement
and compliance portion in SPMS.
7-13
-------
8. HELP
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 8 - WHERE TO GO FOR HELP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION/SUBSECTION SECTION/SUBSECTION
TITLES NUMBERS
Purpose 1
Overview 2
FIGURE FIGURE
TITLES NUMBERS
Reference Tables 8-1
INDEX
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
CHAPTER 8 - WHERE TO GO FOR HELP
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this brief chapter is to provide guidance on where to turn
for information on the planning and budgeting process.
2. OVERVIEW
The text and appendices of this Manual describe EPA's planning and budget-
ing process. However, while this Manual is important, one cannot gain a full
appreciation of the process and procedures by reading alone. If you have a
particular question that is not addressed in this Manual (e.g., procedures
within an individual program office), consult your immediate supervisor. If
he or she is unable to answer the question, they will direct you to the person
within your program office who can. For Headquarters offices, the Senior
Budget Officers and their staffs are the experts on the process. Part of
their responsibility is to provide their program offices with the types of
information and guidance needed to implement their planning and budgeting
responsibilities. Regional Office counterparts of the SBOs are the Management
Division Directors or the Assistant Regional Administrators for Management.
The list on the following page contains the names and numbers of those people
in the Office of the Comptroller that may be of assistance.
The tables in this section are designed to help you in identifying sources
of information in key topic areas. For each area, the table identifies the
most important section of the Manual and other useful documents. In addition,
the table identifies the responsible support office (e.g., the Budget Division
of the Office of the Comptroller).
The last section in this chapter includes an index of the major subject
areas in this manual
8-1
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
CONTACTS FOR THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY'S PROPOSED 1986 BUDGET
Comptroller
Associate Comptroller
Budget Division Director
Budget Planning & Systems
Budget Formulation & Control
Pesticides and Toxics Substances
(Budget Division Contact)
Air & Radiation
(Budget Division Contact)
Water
(Budget Division Contact
Hazardous Waste and Supe'rfund
(Budget Division Contact)
Enforcement & Compliance Monitoring
(Budget Division Contact)
Management and Support:
Office of the Administrator
Office of External Affairs
Office of Administration
and Resources Management
Office of Policy, Planning
and Evaluation
Office of Inspector General
Office of General Counsel
(Budget Division Contact
for Management & Support)
C. Morgan Kinghorn
Clarence E. Mahan
David P. Ryan
Frederick Carman
Vincette Goerl
Walter Muelken
John Adams
Jack Hidinger
Al Pesachowitz
Cynthia Dougherty
John Adams
Thad Juszcak
Jack Edwardson
Gerry Bryan
Al Pesachowitz
Diane Bazzle
Don Flattery
Bill Finister
John Beecher
Ed Canady
Bill Stewart
Al Pesachowitz
382-4151
382-4151
475-8340
382-4157
382-4176
382-2914
(382-4170)
382-7415
(475-8340)
382-5698
(382-4170)
382-4510
(382-4165)
382-4140
(475-8340)
382-4057
382-4057
382-4083
382-4020
475-8206
382-3125
(475-8340)
8-2
-------
Figure 8-1
REFERENCE TABLES
TOPIC AREA
Formulating the EPA Portion
of the President's Budget
Basic Agency Perfor-
mance Goals for the
Budget Year
Preparing NPM Budget
Requests
Internal Reviews
and Appeals.
Preparation of
Materials for OMB
Finalization of
EPA's Portion of
the President's
Budget
KEY SECTION
OF MANUAL
Chapter 3, Section 3a
Chapter 3, Sections
3b and 3c
Chapter 3, Section 3d
Chapter 3, Sections
3 f and 3g
Chapter 3, Sections
3h, 3i and 3j
OTHER DOCUMENTS
Agency Operating
Guidance
• Technical Call
Letter
• BUD Forms
• Issue Papers
• Internal Passback
EPA Submission to
OMB
• OMB Passback(s)
• EPA's Written
Appeal(s)
• Congressional
Materials
• OMB Circular A-ll
LEAD SUPPORT OFFICE
Office of Management
Systems and Evalua-
tion (OMSE)
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division
ro
en
O
C
i-i
O
TO
g
H-
'
Pi
3
Cu
d
Cu
OQ
(D
3
OQ
3
fl)
c!
to
oo
t
u>
N5
I-- M
-•^ -P-
oo o
Ln O
-------
Figure 8-1 (continued)
REFERENCE TABLES
00
i
TOPIC AREA
Developing the Agency's
Operating Plan
Basic Agency Goals
for the Operating
Year
EPA Interaction
with Congress
Development of
the Operating
Plan (Phases I,
II and III)
Workload Modeling
Development of
Performance Goals
and Commitments
KEY SECTION
OF MANUAL
Chapter 4, Section 3b
Chapter 4, Sections
3a and 3g
Chapter 4, Sections
3c-3h
Chapter 4, Section 3d
Chapter 4, Section 3f
Chapter 7, Section 3b
OTHER DOCUMENTS
Agency Operat ing
Guidance
• Call Letters
• O.P. Forms
• "White Paper" on
Workload Modeling
• Documentation for
Individual Work-
load Models
Goals. Objectives,
Commitments and
Measures
LEAD SUPPORT OFFICE
Office of Management
Systems and Evalua-
tion (OMSE)
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division
Office of the
Comptroller
Office of Management
Systems and Evalua-
tion (OMSE)
c
H
o
fD
01
s
o>
3
Q.
CO
a.
en;
fD
3
c
I— NJ
-O-
CO O
Ul O
-------
Figure 8-1 (continued)
REFERENCE TABLES
KEY SECTION
TOPIC AREA OF MANUAL OTHER DOCUMENTS LEAD SUPPORT OFFICE
Managing and Controlling
Resources in the Current
Year
Distributing
Authority to
Program Managers
to Commit and
Funds
Accommodat ing
Changes in Resource
Requirements During
the Current Year
Requesting Carryover
Funds
Requesting
Supplemental
Appropriations
Chapter 5, Sections
2b, 3a and 3b
Chapter 5, Sections
2b, 3c and 3d
Chapter 5, Sections
2b and 3e
Chapter 5, Section 3g
• Advices of
Allowance
• Financial Manage-
ment Manual
• Change Request
Form (OP-2B)
• Policy and
Procedures
Memorandum #4
• Change Request
Form (OP-2B)
• Supplemental
Appropriat ions
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division and
Financial Management
Division
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division and
Financial Management
Division
Office of the
Comptroller:
Budget Division
Office of the
Comptroller
fD
CO
o
l-t
O
03
3
3
W
c:
a.
OQ
3
OQ
3
w
g
(B
00
I
U1
oo o
i_n o
-------
Figure 8—1 (continued)
REFERENCE TABLES
pd
CO
o
i-i
o
(D
§
H-
HI
m
0)
w
Cl-
CW
(D
0
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANUAL
INDEX
SUBJECT CHAPTER/SECTION
Act ion Tracking System (ATS) 7.3.e.
Advices of Allowance 5.2.b.
Agency Guidance (See Agency Operating Guidance)
Agency Operating Guidance 3.3.a.; 4.3.b.; 7.3.a.
Aggregat ions 2.5 .h .
Allotment Holder 5.2.b.
Allowance 5.2.b.
Allowance Holder 3.2.b.
Appeal (OMB/EPA Appeals) 3.3.i.
Apportionment 4.3.b.; 4.3.e.
Appropriat ions 2.5.b.
Budget Elements 2.5.f.
Budget Execution Chapter 5
Budget Formulation Chapter 3
Budget Review Chapter 4
Budget Review Board 3.3.i.
Carryover Authority (Carryover Funds) 5.2.b.; 5.3.d.
Change Request 4.3.e.; 5.3.e.
Commitments 5.3.a.
Congressional Review (See Budget Review) Chapter 4
Continuing Resolution 5.2.b.
8-7
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANUAL
INDEX
SUBJECT CHAPTER/SECTION
Current Year Chapter 5
Enabling Statutes 2.5.a.
Extramural Funds 3.2.b.
Formulation (See Budget Formulation)
Full Time Equivalents (FTEs, OPFTEs, PFTEs) 3.2.b.; 4.3.e.
Functions 2.5.d.
Goals, Objectives, Commitments, and Measures (GOCM) 7.3.b.
Highlight Memorandum 4.3.e
Internal Review 3. 3.d.
Intramural Funds 3.2.b.
Lead Region 3.2.b.
Markup 3.3.d.
Media 2.5.d.
National Program Managers (NPMs) 3.2.a.2.
NPM Submission 3.3.c.
Object Classes 3.2.b.; 3.3.g.
Obligations 5.3.a.
OMB Circular A-ll 3.3.J.
OMB Hearings 3.3.h.
OMB Passback 3.3.h.
OMB Submission 3.3.f.
8-8
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANUAL
INDEX
SUBJECT CHAPTER/SECTION
Operating Plan (Phase I, II, III) 4.3.
Operat ing Year Chapter 4
Policy and Procedure Memoranda (PPMs) Appendix G
President' s Budget 3.3.J.
Pricing Factors 4. 3.d.
Program Elements 2.5.h.
Regional Administrators (RAs) 3.4.b.
Reorganizations 4.3.e.
Reprogrammings 4.3.e.; 5.3.c.
Resources Management Information System (RMIS) 5.2.a.; 5.2.b.
Responsible Planning and Implementation Officer (RPIO) Chapters 4, 5
Restructurings 4.3.e.
Senior Budget Officers (SBOs) 3.3.d.
Strategic Planning and Management System (SPMS) 7.3.c.
Sub activities 2.5.f.
Supplemental Appropriations 5.3.g.
Tier System (See Workload Models) 4.3.d.2.
Workload Models (Workload Analysis) 4.3.d.
8-9
-------
2400
2/1/85
EPA'S PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANUAL
APPENDICES
TABLE. OF CONTENTS
APPENDICES
Schedule for the FY 87 Budget Process Appendix A
Abbreviations and Definitions of Terms Appendix B
RMIS Forms Append ix C
Planning and Control Structure Appendix D
Appropriation Codes and Titles
Media Codes and Titles
Function Codes and Titles
Budget/Program Structure and Codes
Appropriation Authorization Codes and Titles
National Program Manager Codes and Titles
RPIO/Allowance Holder Codes and Titles
Budget/Program Structure (BUDELEM SORT)
Program Element Definitions
Index of Planning and Accounting Reports Appendix E
Listing of Other Relevant Documents Appendix F
Sample Memo Accompanying First Advice of Allowance
Describing Limitations on the Obligation of Funds
Annotated Crosswalk of FMS and RMIS Object Classes
Policy and Procedure Memoranda Appendix G
3-D Operating Under a Continuing Resolution
4-1 Unobligated Carryover Funds
5-D Funding of Discrimination - Investigations and Hearings
6-1 Advices of Allowance for Constructions Grants
9-F Recovery and Use of Construction Grant Funds
17-A Extramural Procurement Plan Development and Implementation
20-A Limitation on Rate of Obligation
Funds Control Manual Appendix H
(To be included at a later date)
-------
APPENDIX A
-------
APPENDIX A
SCHEDULE FOR FY 87 BUDGET CYCLE
-------
DRAFT FY 1986/1987 BUDGET SCHEDULE
1986
1987
December 14, 1984 - January 9, 1985 OMB passback and appeal.
— "• — — — — — — — — — — — — — — •• — — •— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — • — » — — — — — — — — — — _ — •._»___*-. — _«. ._.._.»_.••.«....___..___.._..___...»_.._.»_»_ — _ — ..•__•.•(»..__....__.»_
December 14, 1984 Instructions issued by
OC for Congressional
Submission.
January 4, 1985. Congressional submissions
due to OC from program
offices.
,1 January 22, 1985 Workload model call letter
is issued.
February 2, 1985 Administrator's budget press
conference.
February 4, 1985 Congressional Submission sent
to the Hill.
— —— — — — — — — — — — — — —» — — — •.— —— — — — — — — _«_«„ — — — — «. — — — — — — — — »___„_„_ — — — — — _ — -. — — —_— — — — —— — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —-. — — — ,
February 13, 1985 Administrator's Operating Guidance for FY 1986 and FY 1987 issued.
• -.»» — — — —-.» — •_»_•«_» — — — — — — ——-._—_—_— — — — — _.„ — —„»•__ — »— — — •__«.»_._ — ™__—._ — _ — — — -.——— — — — — — — — — — — — — — -» — — —— — — — » — — — — — — — — — — — — —™ — —.
February 15, 1985 Revised Rud-2s reflecting President's
Budget due to the OC ' '
March 8, 1985
Workload Models and distributions
due to OC. Forwarded to regions.
-------
-2-
198G
1987
>
March 12-14, 1P85 House Appropriation Hearings.
— — — — ———••» — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -. — — — — — — — -. — — — — — — »» — — — — — —— — — — — — ___ — _ — ™_ — — — — — —•-.••••• — .
March 28, 1985 Senate Appropriation Hearings
March 29, 1985 Workload model appeals due.
April 5, 1985 OC issues directions for HQ
spread of FY 1986 President's
Budget by allowance holder.
(Phase I Operating Plan)
April 12, 1985 HO Phase I Operating Plan
due to OC with allowance
holder spread of FY86
President's Budget.
April 15, 1985 OC meeting with DRAs
and MDOs to discuss
85, 86 and 87 issues.
(Tentative)
April 17, 1985 Final decisions on workload
model appeals, OC begins to
develop regional targets.
OPEN
OC meets w/Administrator/Deputy
to discuss 1987 guidance and
process.
-------
-3-
1986
1987
May 1, 1985
Regional dollar targets
completed by OC. Operating
Plan Call Letter distributed
with forms, instructions and
regional targets. (Phase II
Operating Plan)
May 8, 1985
1985 Mid-Year Review completed
>
May 17, 1985
All Phase II Operating
Plans due to OC. OC
OC begins review.
1987 OC Budget Guidance issued
May 23, 1<>85
Regional Operating Plan
Proposals are distributed
to HO program offices for
Review.
May 30, 1985
HO office's submit comments
on FY86 Regional Operating
Plans. OC completes review
and approves reprogrammings
not covered by Congressional
limitations.
-------
-4-
1986
1987
June 3, 1985
Final 1987 targets are
Issued based on the 1986
Operating Plan. Regional
components are coordinated
with lead DRAs.
July 8, 1985
NPMs submit 1987
budget request to OC.
OC analysts review
submissions and prepare
briefing and issue
papers for Administrator.
July 24 - July 31, 1985
Separate one-hour budget reviews
for each media and a separate
regional review are held with
the Administrator and Deputy
Administrator, with follow-up
presentations as needed (1 week),
August 7, 1985
OC issues forms.and
instructions for quar-
terly spread of Opera-
ting Plans (Phase III)
and remaining componenets
(contract and ADP time-
share plans).
OARM passes back decisions
on 1987 budget.
August 14, 1985
Quarterly Spread of
Operating Plans for
HQ and regions, due
to OC.
Appeals submitted to the
Administrator
-------
-5,
1986
1987
August 21, 1985 Administrator makes
final decisions on
1986 budget request.
August 28, 1985 NPMs submit final
justifications to
. OC.
«««W«B«M«««WW«V«*«_WWOVWBa»V«H««WMK«WB*»««l»«BB«««_««d««H«« — *»MMW«»««W*l»W*«M«««a«««W««MMM1l»«w« — • — «^— *««««••*««•».
September 13, 1985 Remaining Components of EPA transmits 191
Operating Plan due. budget to OMB.
•••.•—•••WWBVVVW^aBW^^MBVWB^V — — «««_v—*»«^«««B«_ — v»W«IP'«»««~««~«l««»~*M*~«~«*B»«'>»«««**»««- •*—••—«»—« — — — — ——••——— V^*9— •••••«•*—..
September 13-27, 1985 NPM's prepare detail and
exhibits to 1987 budget
request (object class dis-
tribution, etc).
September 23 - October 4, 1985 OMB conducts
hearings on 1987
Budget Request.
— — — — ™ — — • — _•«»•_»••_« — — — • — _ — „——•_-.« — — ™ — • — — — — — — — —•» — — — — — — » — — «,— — — — — — — — — — » — — •"—— — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — <
October 1, 1985 • FY 1986 begins.
November, 1985 OMB passback is
received and OC
leads Agency
appeal of 1987
Budget Request.
>
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
APPENDIX B
ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 24U1.;
2/1/85
APPENDIX B
ABBREVIATIONS
AA Assistant Administrator
AC&C Abatement, Control and Compliance (appropriation)
ADP Automated Data Processing
ATS Action Tracking System
BD Budget Division
DAA Deputy Assistant Administrator
DRA Deputy Regional Administrator
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EMR Environmental Management Report
EOY End of Year
EOQ End of Quarter
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FMD Financial Management Division
FMS Financial Management System
FTE Full Time Equivalent (workyears)
FY Fiscal Year
GAD Grants Administration Division
GOCM Goals, Objectives, Commitments and Measures
IAG Interagency Agreement
IPA Intergovernmental Personnel Agreement
MR Management Reviews
NOA New Obligational Authority
NPM National Program Manager
OANR Office of Air and Radiation
OC Office of the Comptroller
OER Office of Environmental Review
OMB Office of Management and Budget
OMSE Office of Management Systems and Evaluation
OPFT Other Than Permanent Full Time (employee)
OPFTE Other Than Permanent Full Time Equivalent (workyears)
OPTS Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
ORD Office of Research and Development
PC&B Personnel Compensation and Benefits (object class)
PCMD Procurements and Contracts Management Division
PED Program Evaluation Division
PFT Permanent Full Time (employee)
PFTE Permanent Full Time Equivalent (workyears)
P&PM Policy and Procedure Memo
PR Procurement Request
RMIS Resources Management Information System
RPIO Responsible Planning and Implementation Office
SBO Senior Budget Officer
SPMS Strategic Planning and Management System
S&E Salaries and Expenses
B-l
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
APPENDIX B
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
Advice of Allowance— The Office of the Comptroller issues a formal document,
called the advice of allowance, to each Allowance Holder. This document gives
the allowance holder the authority to obligate funds and workyears. It
details, by quarter, how much money and FTEs are available to execute program
responsibilities. It provides the details necessary for the allowance holder
to put the operating plan into action.
Allowance — An allowance is a portion of the Agency's allotment of resources
that is allocated to an Allowance Holder to fund a specific part of the
Agency's operating plan. These allowances are quarterly estimates of obliga-
tion by appropriation. The Office of the Comptroller issues allowances at the
beginning of the fiscal year and revises and reissues them as necessary,
usually monthly, during the year.
Allowance Holder — An Allowance Holder is a manager who is responsible for a
portion of the agency's allotted funds to implement and report on progress of
the programs and budget covered in that allowance. Allowance Holders manage
allowances, and must operate within the dollar and FTE ceiling provided. The
Deputy Administrator, the Regional Administrators, and the Assistant Admin-
istrators are all Allowance Holders and Responsible Planning and Implementa-
tion Officers (RPIO); all other Allowance Holders serve under an RPIO. Allow-
ance Holders in the Administrator's Executive Offices serve under the Deputy
Administrator; other Allowance Holders serve under an Assistant Administrator.
Apportionment — OMB "apportions", or distributes, the funds appropriated by
the Congress for the Agency. In doing so OMB limits the obligations and
expenditures the Agency can make. OMB apportions funds by quarter.
Budget Year — The budget year is the fiscal year two years from the current
year.
Carryover Funds — Carryover funds are funds that are not obligated by the end
of a fiscal year and may be obligated in the next or succeeding fiscal year.
The source of carryover funds is either no-year appropriations or under the
first year of a two-year appropriation. Carryover funds may be committed,
reserved, or uncommitted/unreserved.
Commitment (Financial) — A financial commitment is a formal action to reserve
money for a specific purpose in the future. The Agency makes commitments for
such things as grants, contracts and payroll.
Commitment (Management) — A program officer makes quantitative performance
commitments for the SPMS.
B-2
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
Current Year — The current year is the present fiscal year, in which the
Agency is executing the operating plan it developed in the previous year.
Extramural Funds — For budgeting purposes, funds are either intramural or
extramural. Extramural activities include those program support activities
performed by personnel other than EPA employees. Extramural funds are funds
for grants, contracts, and interagency agreements.
Full Time Equivalent Hours — These are hours that permanent full-time and
other-than-permanent full time employees work at their basic rate of pay.
Full time equivalent hours include hours for which employees are paid for
annual, sick, holiday,, and other paid leave, but not terminal leave hours,
hours they work as compensatory time, and hours for which they are paid at
overtime rates. They include the hours of employees who are working during
the reporting period and of employees who leave the Agency during the
reporting period. (Full time equivalent hours divided by 2080 equals full
time equivalent years.)
Function — A function is a budget classification that is a subdivision of a
budget activity/media; it is the third highest level of aggregation in EPA's
official program/budget structure. EPA's eight functions include: research
and development, abatement and control, enforcement, buildings and facilities,
management and support, scientific activities overseas, U.S. Regulatory
Council, and construction grants.
Guidance — The Guidance, or Agency Operating Guidance, is published each
February. It is a planning tool covering two years. The Operating Year and
the Budget Year. It contains the Administrator's statement on goals, priori-
ties and measures for each of the program offices. It also contains a list of
specific Agency priorities.
Intramural Funds — For budgeting purposes, funds are either intramural or
extramural. Intramural activities include those program support activities
performed by EPA employees. Intramural funds are funds for personnel, travel,
equipment, and all other categories.
Media — Media are EPA's major program areas; media generally follow statutory
authority provided to EPA. Currently EPA has 11 media: air, water quality,
drinking water, pesticides, hazardous waste, radiation, Superfund, energy,
interdisciplinary, toxic substances, and management and support.
National Program Manager — National Program Managers (NPMs) are those Agency
officials responsible for overview of particular Agency media programs.
New Obligational Authority — New Obligational Authority is money that Con-
gress has appropriated to the Agency for obligation in the current fiscal
year.
B-3
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
No-Year Appropriation — A no-year appropriation is an appropriation of funds
which Congress has made available for obligation until all funds are expended.
These funds can be carried over into new fiscal years and do not expire until
all of authority has been used.
Object Class — An object class is a category of goods or services for which
the Agency makes obligations.
Obligation — An obligation is a commitment to spend a given amount of money
for a transaction that occurs during a given period. Payment may be.either
during the same period or during a future period. Obligations are incurred
for such transactions as purchase orders, contracts, or services.
OMB Passback— When the Office of Management and Budget receives the Agency's
budget request for the coming budget year it makes some initial decisions,
perhaps changes, and passes back the original request with comments and modi-
fications. This revised budget is called a Passback. EPA has the option of
appealing the Passback.
Operating Plan — Operating plans are detailed plans estimating obligations by
program element, section of law, object class and quarter. Approved operating
plans provide the basis for the Office of the Comptroller to issue advices of
allowance.
Operating Year — The operating year is the fiscal year one year from the
current year for which the Agency develops its operating plan to translate the
President's Budget into detailed operational goals.
Other Than Permanent Full Time (OPFT) — These are employees the Agency hires
under: (a) part time permanent appointments, (b) part time temporary or
indefinite appointments, (c) full time temporary or indefinite appointments,
and (d) intermittent appointments (The Agency hires these employees on an
irregular or occasional basis). This category includes State assignees.
Permanent Full Time (PFT) — These are employees who work a full time schedule
(eighty hours per pay period) and are in Civil Service Tenure Groups 1 and 2.
They include competitive service career and career conditional appointments,
excepted service appointments, and Commissioned Corps Officers.
Planned Obligational Authority — Planned obligational authority is funding
that has been planned to be obligated for a certain expenditure and carries
with it the authority to use it for that expenditure.
B-4
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
President's Budget — Every January the President submits a Budget to Con-
gress. It contains budgets for agencies and departments in the Executive
Branch. EPA's portion of the President's Budget is prepared during the Budget
Formulation Phase. The President's Budget for those Agency is the budget the
President presents to Congress. The President's Budget reflects those
resources that the Agency expects to implement and maintain to meet their
goals and missions in the next fiscal year.
Program Element — A program element is a classification within EPA's program/
budget structure which represents a distinct program activity. Each program
element resides wholly within one budget subactivity.
Program Element Number — A program element number is a six-character code
which identifies the program element, its appropriation, its budget activity/
media, function and its budget subactivity.
Reprogramming — A reprogramming re-allocates resources within the current
Operating Plan to meet changing Agency needs. This can take several forms.
Allowance Holders may reprogram resources within their allowance; RPIOs may
reprogram resources between their allowance holders; the Administrator may
reallocate resources across the Agency. A change request form initiates the
request for a reprogramming. Approval by the Office of the Comptroller is
contingent upon Congressional, OMB and Agency limitations of funds.
Responsible Planning and Implementation Officers (RPIOs) — The Regional
Administrators, the Assistant Adminstrators, and the Deputy Administrator
serve as RPIOs for their organizational areas. The Deputy Administrator
serves as an RPIO for the Administrator's staff offices. RPIOs £re respon-
sible for developing and implementing operating plans, controlling resources,
reviewing programs, and for related functions in the overall planning,
budgeting, and programming process. Each RPIO is also an allowance holder.
Workload Analysis — Workload analysis is performed to help determine Regional
allocation of workyears. The analysis identifies key activities in a p-ogram
and estimates the level of activity and the resources (workyears) that are
necessary to support that level of activity.
B-5
-------
APPENDIX C
-------
APPENDIX C
RMIS FORMS
-------
APPENDIX C
Index of
Input/Output Forms
Program Element Analysis - BUD 1 Form for NPM Submission
Form BUD 1A (input/output)
Form BUD 2 (input/output)
Program Element Analysis — Rec 1— used during internal passback.
Form BUD 1 — output sent to OMB with narratives.
Form BUD 1A — submitted with BUD 1 to OMB
Form BUD 2 — output sent to OMB
Form BUD 2 — sent to OMB for use during OMB's review process
Budget Request by object class
Final Budget Form
Regional Workyear Distribution Proposal
Regional Program Contract/Grant Dollar Allocations
Regional Workload Models — FTE Distribution by Region by Program
Phase I Operating Plan Distribution
Phase II Operating Plan Change Request (input)
Phase III Operating Plan Quarterly Distribution
Change Request/Notification - Funding/Work Years
Advice of Allowance
Explanation of Changes to the Advice of Allowance
Approved Operating Plan by Allowance Holder
Approved Operating Plan by Allowance Holder and Object Class
-------
INPUT/OUTPUT
UNITtO STATtS ENVIRONMENTAL PHOTEC11ON AGENCY
HKOOWAM ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Pfc COOFI HCb?ft -tut 41 KM HE TI1LEI UfFlCE OF POLICY ANALYSIS
KtSPONSlOLE OfriCf.1 AA H»LICY» PLANNING Ik EVALUATION
PFU.
OPFTF
fO«\L FTt
BUDGET AUTHOM1TY
INTHAML'HAL
1 l'.)H4 1 1<4B?> 1
! UPLAD 1 Hl'fcS. HUO 1
I AS Of (./1/SAI I
JJ.b 43.0
?*.S 19.1
f>j.i) M.I
g.HTH.H J.077.4
4,l-H7.b 7, 401. 8
7.7?6.J 10.479.2
19U6 I
TAHOETS 1
1
43.0
19.1
62.1
7.401.8
10.479.2
LEVEL 1
45.0
16.1
61.1
3.100.1
7.401. B
10.501. 9
19H6 INCHEMENTS 1
1 LEVEL 2 1 LEVEL 3 1 LEVEL 4 1
1 1 ((OPTIONAL))
6.0
6.0
400.9
39S.O 900.0 ItSOO.O
795.9 900.0 1(500.0
TOTAL 1
BUOtitT 1
HEOUES1 1
51.0
16.1
67.1
3(546.0
10(196.6
13(744. b
CHANUE
FHOM
B6 TAHGtTS
8.0
-3.0
5.0
470.6
3(26b.6
I JUSTTFICATIOM
o»»oo FYH», HUI10FT PROCESS - HUH 1 KiPM K)H NpM SUBMISSION •»•••«
l'M-i'?5 PfcPUUI MUIJ-1
PACiE
-------
RUO-IA
UUITtU SI ArtS ENVIRONMENTAL HHCMECT10N AGENCY
PROGRAM F.LEHENT ANALYSIS
HE CUOfc
HO ___ Kf _ _ Pt IIILt
»•;••• is t r.u
oHjtrrrxhSt AMI
O
I
to
f.l.tMfc'HS f)£SCHIPTH)i A. ill
ACCOMPLISHHtNIS
C'F CMAHCt - \'!"'•• »K'> ..II'! il.Kli' i:ii!'-l)
-------
US L WIIKHI.'H.TAL HHOttCTIOH AGENCY
Kttfit'M PHlClMii ANALYSIS
H:J »«!_„ Ht TITLE..
ICE
/' I'lMCIiin IS F.ATHAMUWAL ONLY «CO'JT«ACTSt ti
LEVtL 1
|S»'"t»i|«
I FY IVi't | KY IVRb I
i or t'L-"N 01 M IPKF.S. MUOOET OUT I
u IF: i »• i IMP i IF it- i * i PUT if
AND 1A0 DOLL»«S ONLY)
LEVEL 3
FY 19B6 INCREMENTS
I LEVEL 2 I
OUT I OUT I
IPUT IFTt I « IPUT IFTE I
OPTIONAL
I LEVEL 4
OUI I OUT
IPUI IFTE I * IPUT
n
OJ
• •• (MUI)-?il — "SMI J-f'RINr-i su..-!|«,sicj'')
-------
UNlTtO STA1ES ENVIMU'IMEMIAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PHUflMAM ELEMENT ANALYSIS
INPUT/OUTPUT
I'tSPONSIMLF OFFICEl AA POLICY. PLANNING «. EVALUATION
I l°n<-, I 1<*H5 I 19BS I 19H5 I 19H6 I 1986 I 1946 I
I Pi'tS. HUH I oi'L-AN I ENACTED I HCKA I TOTAL I PASSBACK I APPEAL I APPEAL
i i • i (PASSHACK)i SUPPLEM. i KEOUEST i i i
rt C'lOf 1 "Ksb.A ilul 4] P-li CE TlTLkl PR06HAM MAHAl)c"ENT - POLICY, PLANNING
llMAL F rt 20.1 1*.0 J4
EATHAMim/il_
TOTAL I. 016.* 7SU.4 75H
PE coon IIMSSA Mm 41 r?i i Mt TiiLti INTEKRATEU
IOTAL F IL ?(!.(> ?0.0 ?U
IMTHAMiliv^L V30.1 V30.7 930
EXTPAMH^/>.L £",710,5 d>/l'J.b 2,710
(dT'.L i. 64i|,6 . 3«f.4].2 3,641
O
1
PE COUFl H(;s^A HOI 41 K1 1 Pt TITLEI OFFICE OF
IOTAL FTt '.77.4 3*111.0 J,lil
EAFHAHIJ(l.d . f,3ol.H 7,3ol
IOTAL ii),47v,/ io,4ij.6 10,413
PE C°UF 1 "US5A HIM 41 I'll >'E II1Lt» OFFICE UF
rn i AL F rt (, r. i f.v.8 ov
COfAL 5,i/l».l 5,11)4.2 5,1"*
.0 14.0
.4 730.8
.4 730.fi
AND EVALUATION
14.0
75H.7
752.7
14.0
752.7
75?. 7
14.0
730.0
730. B
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
.U 20.0
.t 910.0
.2 3*620.5
t'OLKY ANALYSIS
.1 70.1
.» 3,b45.0
.8 10,196.8
.6 13*741. P
SFAliDARiJS «. HEOULATIONS
.H 73.8
./. 3,479.8
.2 6 , 36 I . R
20.0
937.3
3*647.8
68.1
3*225.0
9*201.8
12*426. U
73. B
3*442.3
20.0
937.3
3*647. H
69.0
3*230.0
12.431.H
74.8
3*442.3
1*982.0
5. 414. 3
20.0
910.0
2*710.5
3*620.5
72.1
3.541. U
10. 196. B
13*737. B
75.8
3*479.0
2.UH2.0
6*361.8
MIUH-* i pi>'iifi.';s - >cESS) «••••
I'Abt
-------
IWUT/OU1PUT
HUI> ''I
UMIltU STATtS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PMUOKAM £LtKtN| ANALYSIS
Pt CiHJtl KI>S'.>A HOI 4-1 Hit PE TITLtl PKOGHAM MANAtiEMfNT - POLlCft
UFFlCtJ />' Pi'LICYt PLANNINf} r. tVALUATIUN
ANt)
t'LAH
I l'»HS | l
-------
ii.il Ttl) STATES t'lVlHUNMENTAL PKUIf.CMON AGENCY
ANALYSIS
ft Cl'Dt ____ H" . __ HI __ Hfc IllLE
-------
US EMVIHOfJMflTAL PROTECTION AUfCNCY — PROGWAM fLEMENT PHICING ANALYSIS
(U'JLLAHS IN THOUSANDS)
OUTPUT
PE roML HO *T Hfc TITLE I
OFFICEl.
'tCirvjfjtS «. ACCOMHLISHHtNfS
.
1
1
FY 1984
PHOJ ACTUALS
FTt I i(Exr.)
'
OUIHU?
1
FY 19Bb
OPtPATlNO PLAN
FTE 1 »(EXT.)
OUTPUT
1
1
FY 19U6
REQUEST
KTt 1 KEM.)
'
~
OUTPUT
n
i
-------
OUTPUI
rh C''I)K I H0'>;:ij n
i't-Sl""JSlhL( . ••> F ICK
UMICK W NANA«tMF.MT AND HUUGET
KE'JOLWCf.S UIVISlON--tNVl»ONHENT
IlJCHEASE/OtCHEASE ANALYSIS
HTI X f'E TIlLEl HAZARDOUS KASTt MAfJAGEMENT HEQUl.ATOHV STHAfEGIES IMPLEMENT A HON
AA S'.'LIn wAbfE «>
PtUSi).i"f I.
'tlMT II'H 1
HI.AI4 I
i •»•«!>
1 1VH6 1 NRl)
ISUPPLEMtrilALI HCUUEST 1 RECOMHEN-
1 1 1 OAT10N
1 (*) UR (-)
1 FROM
1 BUD. KEOUEST
FTE
4 ?().!)
116.0
451.9
BUl>OFT A"t'IOHiTr
15tT36.7
6,^34.9 15tT96.7
»•• FY 19"(>. BtHXtl.r V"'«:F.SS - »U!M ISt'H TO OMH fUH dSt RUHINO OMB'S IfJftWNAL
OF iPA
-------
INHUT
NPK
apjoj
PEI
(SU>
!iO) AA Ht!
10 J
OFFICE
(26) OHi
AAi)Ail> SCI
SECTION OF
'JH.lt.CT CLA.-iS
CAlFu'lKltS
SEARCH ft UEVELOP^CriT
i?«6 BUni
fHOM
OF THE COMPTHOLLEW 1(^^=2251
)
AS QAShP&HT AIR
LA*
OC !9llb 1986
CODE PHASF. 11 BUUOET
OHFN PLAN REUUEST
3ET &Et)UES1 DISTHIBUTION
B
1 OHIO CHNO
1
1VB6 HUUOtf
RtUUEST DISTRIBUTION
(ABSOLUTE)
OA1E!
BV OHJECT CLS&S TIME8
CAT68
RMJS COUE ACTION CODE
(7-21) (22)
& - AAOA1U - 2 UTILITIES
PRINTING ». HEPHO
OTHER CONTH sewvicts
SUPPLIES fc MATERIALS
EOUIPMENT
LAND AND STRUCTURES
iNSllrf CLAIH/lNUt
R » D CONTHOC1S
I A3
PROGRAM CONTRACTS
AOP CONTftACT SERVICE
AOEMCV COMPUTEM SERVICE
RESEAMCH GRANTS
OE*n r,H/\MS
ORlS TO STATES *. GOVI
OTHER G»ANIS
••TOTAL «•*•*.
PFfE
OPFTt
eo TOTAL. FU.
*1 1 4Z1.J 1 4?I,3 1
*a i 21,2 i 20.0 i
43 1 4.H 1 4.6 1
44 1 31.4 1 31.4 1
4* 1 5.6 1 5.6 1
46 1 57.1 1 57.1 I
47 1 6.4 I 6.4 1
4f< 1 8.4 1 8. 4 1
4
-------
INPUT
(HT) NF.titutlS TOTAL
1986 FINAL HUOOtT (CONGRESSIONAL)
DATE I
TIME!
T0|
F HUM I
OATtl
OKriCt OF TMr
(PM-2P5)
HP10I (Ml) KtCi TOTAL i»l STATIONARY SRCt
PF.I 4FHA3A STAT SHCt f.»F
» I 1
63 1 1
64 1 l
-------
yHAL DECISION UNIT WORK YEAR DISTRIBUTION PRGru
A. DECISION UNIT CODE AND TITLE (Include PE •..<»
1111°)
B. NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE
« *H
FY IS
OA1C
C. NATIONAL OFFICE CONTACT (n.m. mnd /.l«,...cmO
0. RECIOHAL PARTICIPANTS rc«ni/nu* on
NAME
REGION
TITLE
E. WORKYEAR DISTRIBUTION PROPOSAL SUMMARY i"> toiht ol . wo,kr..,)
FV 19 PLAN
FV 19 PROPOSAL
DIFFtriEHCE
TFTE
TFTE
Pf TB
QP r T £
TFTE
REGION
F. WORKLOAD ANALYSIS AMD DISTRIBUTION METHODOLOGY fco,,t/im. on ,.*c,.°)
-------
]-• |fi«i>trir
REGIONAL PARTICIPANTS (c»,,n,,u°J) '
NAME
•
REGION
TITLE
WORKLOAD ANALYSIS AND DISTRIBUTION METHODOLOGY fcon./nu.d)
-------
opt
REGIONAL DECISIOH UNIT PROGRAM CONTRACT/GRANT POLLAR ALLOCATIONS
A. DECISION UNIT COPE AND TITLE f/ncluJo PE unit
till*) ' - '
B. NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE
OPERAT
NG YEAR
FY 19
PATE
J-AN FOfiM Ol
C. NATIONAL OFFICE CONTACT <"•"•• ••«' Itlaphona)
D. REGIONAL PARTICIPANTS (co,,tinu. on ,,v.,..)
NAME
•
REGION
TITLE
E. CONTRACT OR GRANT DOLLAR DISTRIBUTION (to loth'* ol it 000)
FV 19
PLAN
CONTRACTS/GRANTS
FV |9
PROPOSAL
CONTRACTS/GRANTS
DIFFERENCE
CONTRACTS/GRANTS
*
REGION
1
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
TOTAL
!
F. DISTRIBUTION RATIONALE fcon«/mi« «.. roror.o)
. F • ?<) 73 (i --01
-------
10 f;}«tler»
REGIONAL PARTICIPANTS (conilnu.drj
NAME
*
REGION
TITLE
DISTRIBUTION RATIONALE (continued)
o
I
-------
OUTPUT
o
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUtNCY
REGIONAL "flPKLIIAO MOOELvS
REGIONAL FV 1986 RECEIVED FTES DISTRIBUTION HY REGION Afu
PAlit
NfcPUKI - 3
PE CODE
A20A20
A?3A.»F
AFHS^A
AHxf ?A
A«2»2A
AaaH?A
AGMSjD
A49B£D
A5|B?D
A7XB^r>
AS392F
A^aBjG
A56&2G
AF£RjA
AFDH-^H
A70C?D
A71C2H
AFFC3A
ABo°2r>
AGOOjA
AFKE*A
AJDF20
AKKM?A
AJAH*A
AFLL3A
AKVT5A
A2XTSA
A3XT5A
A3YTSA
A37T5A
A4AT5A
A4BT5A
T6BY3A
TJBY3A
TENY5A
TETYSA
TEYY5A
GRAN!) TOTAL
TITLE
AIR JUAL MGT IMPLEM
AMBIENT AIR 0 MNTRG
STAT SRCE ENF
WTR OUAl. MANAGEMENT
GREAT LAKFS PROGRAM
CHESAPEAKE "AY «Q S
DREOGE AND FILL
OCEAN DISPOSAL PEHM
ENV EMER RES ft PRfV
STANDARDS & REGULAT
WTR 0 MNTRG ANALYSI
MUN MST T,RT**NT FAC
WST TREAT OPSftMAINT
WATER OUAL ENFoRCEflEflT
PERMIT ISSUANCE
puss PROGRAM ASSTNC
UNDEHG T.M.I CNTL PRO
DRINKING WATER EMFO
HW MGT REG 3TRAT J"
HAZ W3T ENF - DiMEK
PEsTKIOEfl ENFORCED
RAD PROG IMP|.MNTION
NEPA COMPLIANCE
FED AGENCIES CO^PL
ENF POLICY * n»RN3
TOX SUB ENFRC^ENT
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
REGIONAL COUNSEL
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
ANALYSIS R EVALUATION
FIN MANAGEMENT-REG
PERSONNEL MGMT-PEG
ADMIN MGMT- REGIONS
HAZ SUB TECH ENFORCE
HAZ SUB.tEGAL ENFOR
HAZ SUB FIN MAT REG
HA/ SUM AOMN MGT RT
HAZ SUB LEG SERV RT ,
MAZ SPILL * SHE HE
I
24.0
7.7
16.1
5.4
.0
.0
3. a
1 ,5
4,9
3,9
12.9
36.3
3.0
30.5
43.5
10,2-
|j
40.1
16.9
4.n
1.0
6.2
9.0
5.7
3.8
6.5
5^6
7./4
7.5
15.2
25. S
i!«
1.7
1.3
44S!?
II
22.5
7.4
28.3
5.7
.0
.0
9J9
6.5
3.5
15.0
44.5
2.8
37. (1
33.«5
8.7
12.8
.7
25!7
6.5
3.3
10.2
13.0
16.9
4.5
8.1
20.1
6.5
9.9.
11.0
18.5
42.9
15.2
3.0
2.9
3.4
67.4
577.6
III
32.7
10.0
31.4
5.2
.0
5.0
6.6
2.0
9.5
5.9
16.6
57.2
3.0
38,6
25.2
18.9
13.6
1.6
30.1
21.0
5.4
1.0
7.7
17.0
8.5
4.5
8.8
20.2
6.4
9.9
10.7
17.6
34.9
12.4
2.5
2.4
1.7
60, B
593.1
R E
IV
36.2
12.4
35.2
8.3
.0
.0
11.0
1.9
9.7
9.0
20.1
57,8
0.3
59,4
32.0
12.6
16.6
3.8
74.2
23.1
10.5
1.0
».'<
15.2
10.8
5.1
10.2
20.7
7.1
11.3
12.4
19. (I
38.1
13. -5
2.5
2.4
1.6
*>«3,2
G I 0
V
50.9
15.6
69.5
8.9
15.0
.0
8.1
.0
8.5
9.0
J9.5
64.2
5.6
44.6
25.8
17.8
22.0
7.0
78.5
42.8
10.3
1.0
9.4
32.0
30.2
5.5
12.6
21.8
6.0
13.9
15.6
23.3
53.6
19.0
3.9
3.7
3.3
BB.7
094.9
N S
VI
26.6
9.0
26.9
6.7
.0
,0
5.2
1.0
5.7
6.9
15.1
43.4
2.9
52.9
47.9
9.9
15.6
5.1
47. b
19.9
B.B
1.0
7.8
13.1
14,2
4.5
6.8
20.1
6.4
10.7
10.4
17.6
29.5
10,4
1.9
1.8
.8
38.7
563.2
VII
17.4
6.9
15.6
8.7
.0
.0
3.6
.0
4. ft
3.4
13.0
31.)
1,9
18.0
9.5
8.5
B.O
.3
27.8
13.1
13.6
1.0
5.3
10.2
9.3
3.6
5.3
ie.9
5.2
8.5
6,fl
14,6
21.5
7.6
1.6
1.5
.5
42.0
371.2
VIII
22.3
8.0
14.9
5.4
.0
.0
3.6
.0
4.9
4.6
12.6
24.7
2.0
18. 9
13.9
15.5
12.1
2.3
29.5
9.4
10.6
1.0
5.4
9.0
6.9
3.6
5.6
16.9
5.2
6.3
7.0
14. B
6.3
2.9
1.0
.7
,5
l«.*
336.2
IX
"2.3
8.9
23.8
5.4
.0
.1'
2.0
1.3.
4.0
3.9
12.7
36.5
2.5
16.0
25.1
14,1
14.)
4.2
"3. 1
15.e
9.3
1.0
5.4
9,0
9,0
3.9
6.6
19. a
5.6
7.6
7.9
15;3
13.6
4.6
1.2
1.1
.7
32. h
441.6
X
19.3
6.6
13.7
5.6
.0
.0
7.5
1.3
3.4
3.1
11.6
24.1
2.0
22.4
36.1
16.2
8.7
3.2
19.3
b,9
5.0
1.0
6.4
9.0
6.4
3.5
5.3
IB. 6
5.1
7.1
6.6
14.6
11.9
4.2
1.0
.B
.5
20.9
343.4
TUTAL
294.4
92.5
277.6
6b,J
15.0
5,0
55.6
IB. 9
61,1
55.2
149,3
441.8
30,0
340,7
2V2.S
132,4
129.5
«J6 ,5
451.9
193. U
84.2
12.3
7?, *
53 0
136,5
117, V
42,5
, 7B.2
196.2
61.1
92.6
95.9
170.9
279.6
99,0
20,4
19,0
14.3
471,0
5,249.6
TN A
UF
SIMILAR
-------
ATTACHHENT A
1986 PHASE 1 OPERATING PLAN DISTRIBUTION
INPUT
UA1EI
TIMEI
TO |
OK-ICE OF WtSO'lHCtS MAMnOt 'F"l (PM-ZZ5)
I'ATEI
»KIO| (?7) AA A1H AMU
PEI AFHA3A SI A I Sf»CE E MF
(»U) StCllOD OF LA*
——FOR OC "SE ONLY-
I OHIO CHNO
I (1-2) (3-6)
I HI 5002
RMIS COUt ACTION COUt
(7-21) (22)
6 - AFHA3A - 27 - DU
O
I
itn CLASS
». u <; AH (bfc) AH ( )
PHASE i PLAN PLAN PLAN PLAN PLAN
(33-40) (41-48) (49-56) <5if-64) (65-72)
AH ( )
PLAN
(74-«0)
PENS ci"*' \ hf"
TRAVEL *. THA.*SP PEPS
TPAfiSp OF' ItifNUS
HENT CdllH & UTILITIES
PfUNTlNP H.HEPHO
OTHEK CONTH SEKVICES
SUPPLIES *. MATE'-'IALS
EQUIPMENT
LANP AND SI'KUC HiWtS
INSUM CLAIM/ICUF.
rt 4 11 CONTRACTS
uo
PNOtfhAM t^TXACTS
Al>P CONTRACT SfciU'ICt
1AL '•1-'- J7'i.4 I !UtUl3.8 I I I I
PF It /!'• r.h I ZSM.V I I I I
OPF It d 1 1 !»'. 1 1 1 1 1
o»lii1AI. f IF /,* I
-------
KIM " (l'>)
Mn/,st 11
PLAN CMAMBt
L'ATEI
TIUFI
n
lot
FKO'11
f)ATF. 1
UMire (' If.S COi'L
Pt«s c U *•• •>. ntu 41
TRAVtl. *• THA'jSH V'tMS 4?
fRANSP Of- THl.KjS .» »
rtlM CUI'M ». UTILITIES 4'-
PRlMll^r, «. t'M'KO . ts
OTHEW Ci'i
INSUH Cl.Al'1/lni.iF. b"
rt * U CfNlMACIi 61'
IAO (.]
PRO(.»A^ tONTMACTS 6?
APP C'"-'TRACI SU'VICE 01
ISHft 1NCHEASE/ REVISED
PHASE 1 DECREASE 'IHEH. PLAN
CS/-64)
Ii046.7 1 1 1
hO.O I I I
1 1 1
1.9 t 1 1
51 1 1
' 4.V 1 1 1
1.4 1 1 1
2.0 1 1 1
xxxxxxx'xxxxxxxxxxixAxxxxxxxxxixxxxxxxxxxxi
AX!'XJ(XXX)'.XXXXXXXX|XXXXX>.XXXAX|XXXXXXXX>kX I
1 1 1
1 ' 1
••• • 1 1 1
'•'.'. 1 ' 1
JUSTIFICATION / IMPACT
A
B
C
U
I
F
0
H
1
J
>UXX*AX.v.r>.XXXXXXXXXXXXXX,AXX*XAXXXXXXXXXXXA
OEHO RNA.-.rS 7J 1 1
OPfS TO STATES « UOVT 7T 1 1
OTHEH KI'A'MS M 1 1
• «T ill At Vfct, < i 1 1 /.4 1 1
Pf f{ ^' ,%1 .fi 1 1
OVF If ^ f' i : . r 1 1
o» 1 in M F 1 > .-'•' . ii 1 1
1
•
1
1
1
1
1
I
-------
n
oo
HPI't (If..) AA AliMtN •» 1
OF F ICt OF iMf
PEI /U.SS5A f'l.'lir.IMM Mi*1
(19) «;in ion nh LAW
"H.ILCt CLASS
Pt*S (A:-!|' . N (•» '1
TRAVEL «. TMANM' rH'S
fP*ilSI' Of- (MlMoS
rtENT CUf'M «. U 111. 1 I IF S
Pw|ri| | ur; x. )•(• ri-i;
OTMf.U Cl>NTK SEMVJCES
SUPPLIES «, ii«lti COMpMlLt' SM'VJCf
rtESFA'-'C1* QMAN1 S
OE^'l cMANTS
(JHt<; HI STATES '- ' I'V 1
OTHf.H (-l.Ai.l-.
..Il.tAL M...
PF lr
^^ n
^^B>" 1 . 1 Al 1 1 >
l-Fbl'lJUCK M'jT INf'UT UATEI
IVBr SClil.'tf: .'('T 1 OHIG CHNO «- HMIS ClJLiE ACTION COOt
i - (»Ai«fi i (i-2) (3-6) (T-2i) i^^^
1 6 - AOSSbA • 16 - 9V
UPtWATlNfl PLAN HY OUAWTEKS
OC . 19Mb .PHASE 11 MUST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
r«il.if. n»»F'HftJIN(; PLAN (JUArMt^ OUAHTtK UUAHTEH UUAKTLK TOTAL
(J3-4Q) (41-48) (49-S6) (57-64)
*i vnu.7 I i I i I i I
4? 48.7 11(1111
*.<-.. l.U 1 I | I II 1
<»4 11. S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4S 5.5 1 1 1 1 II 1
<*<> ?43.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
oi - lb.0 1 1 1 I 1 I I
4li ' 30.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
««l XA,AXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXXAXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
bO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(>" : 1 | i| |l |
61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
*7. V | I I | I II
bl« 10,0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
*>/> VtXXXfXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXAXAXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXA
7 n " | 1 | I 1 | 1
n i i i i i I i
r,- • . i I i i i I I
r i i i i i i i I
i.zrj.9 i i i i i i i
,'• ,'ii.b i i i i i i
-------
OPERATIC.
FOUM OP-
CHAWGE REQUEST/NOT8FJCATION - FUNDING/WORKYEARS
BOO USE ONLY
ORIG
1-2
is
CHANGENO.
3-6
TO:
Office of the Comptroller (PM-225)
FROM:
DATE
PAGE
Ol
'EFFECTIVF Hi
IREPROGRAMM-
RESOURCES PROGRAMMING (All except SHADED colnmnt mutl da lilted)
P.E. NUMBER
• - it
AH
RC
17
•*
'*}
,
AA
fV
RH
18-19
LCL
10-21
.:M^:
"'%
}
Al
CO
TN
22
OC
BL
21-24
OBJECT CLASSES
21 PFT 48 Equipment
23 OPFT 49 Land & Structural
26 PFTE 60 Iniuronca
27 OPFTE 60 H & D Contract*
41 Part Comp & Ban 61 IAG
42 Traval & Tranip 62 Program Contracti
Part 63 A OP Contract
43 Tranip ot Thlngo Sarvlcoo
44 Rant Commun & 70 Reiaarch Grants
Hapro ^^ <-*, 71 Demo Gronlo
45 Printing a Repro 72 Granio to Statae,
46 Other Contr Inot'no & Locol
Sorvlcot Governments
07 Supplloo a t3 OlhoJ Oito (Trg
Motorlalo Fallouiahlpc)
CURRENT FY QUARTERS
FIRST
31-40
SECOND
41-48
'.
Tinno
49-56
FOURTH
S7-64
CURRENT YEAR
TOTAL
FY
-Ji;;:j-*'/i:.:...\->-.:::-
'^•l^-'
,:•••; ••?;[••-. . • ; '•;•.
'i?>\ . •.• •• >.•• , ... '
•'',:' •;'••-.. * •
'••'•'.'•>:'! 'v-v:: .•;.'
.!,-.. : ••' V,' : -T ." '
.
BUDGE! V( .
TOTAL
F V
6S- 7J
PURPOSE/STIPULATIONS
n
IRow.
cx«t«loi la ui
-------
OUTPUT
o
tv3
O
]
lALLO'.'ANfF RtClI'ltNT
IHtGIONAL A()MlNf;>TKA|Of<
IEPA I'EOION 1)1
IJUHH F. KENNEDY BLOW,
(ROOM 2?n3
|F«0«;iy'*» MASS. "2803
1 _
H-'UAMItM.V l>)«;|iJ|t>UI H>'J
1
(1ST 'JIM.
I2NO OTH.
I3«r» ulR.
I4IM OTH. (CUMULI
TOTAL
ADvICE OF ALLOWANCE
lALLO^ no.lCHNU NO,| Fr
liS-OlKft I 07 11986
1 1 1
IAPPROP SYMBOL & TITLE
1
lbH
FO<« ANY SUPEHFUNO
I" i»E5«l'KCtS OW xilRKYEARi JN IME ALLOWANCES FUN
F. t'CSPO'-iSF. TH1IST FUND. MAY
Mf. USEO FOH OTHEH ThAN
/y'isrtMPF;!! FI'U'I/TO ANY pnixiHAh ELt'-iENi KITHOUI
t. UFF1CK OF .|i"t fOHPTPOLLKH,
n-( IKEVJbEl' (''TFFF. 1 i,UKi(tm 1 CMA"OK Ht'^lStO
1 1
1 1 rv<. .1 | S 1 U I H . 1
i T ),u r.'.'li 1) IK.
, ,..4.V ,4..'l, (JTH.
.nn.
• /••>,' 1 ill Al
1
-n) tn i .
i i .•. .'•>'•*
i i >t, ;t
1
1 '».4 ' 119.*
'IJ.H | |J J.U
7 f,* 1 7 •».»
1
»•• , n 1 MJ , •'
i 1
' . ;t M .' n ' . I !"'
^fc,,n. . ! .,-,/^/'-.
^^^V i
-------
09-Ol-B*. t.XPLANATIOM OF CHANGES TO THE AUVlCt OF ALLOHANCtS
ADJUSTMiN IS TO 6-01K6* CHAMttt 007
OUTPUT
PMOGRAM
ELFMENT
1ST
2tiO UlH
AMOUNT
3RD
*Th UTK
TOTAL
AJAH1«
o
ro
OOLL«HS
PF T f I F.
TOT t IF.
OC Fit
PFT f If.
TUT » IF.
OC FTf
DOLI-AKS
PF T F 1 1
TUT F ffj
OC Fit
•SUBTOTAL
PfT f IF
lot ^ it
OC Fit
14iOOO UiOOO
4.000 4tOOO
12*700 1?»700
30*700 30*700
PFT f Tf
TUT f It.
OC Fit
THIS ACTION ISSUES THf FVB6 SUPPLEMENTAL 1NCKEASE FO* THE
SALAHJFS ANI> EXPf.HSF.S f'AVHAISfL* tt*»1 MILLION)
3*000 3*000
-3*000 -3*000
PH F I F;
TUT F IF
OC FT If.
-------
OUTPUT
09-01-M6 HMIS A-6
UNITED STATiS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPKOVLO OPERATING PLAN
AH 01 Hfl PLUJOU 1 (IOSTOM HY ALLOWANCE HOLOERS 6-01K6
SALARIES A"U trPEnsts A»
PHUOK/Vrt SUM-ELEMENT
NI.IMMI.H TITLE
AFMA3A STAT SHCE ENF
A2QA20 AIR OUAL MOT IMPLEX
A23A2F AMBIENT AIR 0 WNTHO
TOfAL AIR
AFUH3H PERMIT ISSUANCE
o *FtR3A WATEH DUAL ENFORCEMENT
M AGriHZn PREUOt A^u FILL
AHXHZA HTR OUAL MANAGEMEN1
A»«n2n OCEAH IUSPOSAL PENH
451B2D ENV EMt'< RES i PREV
A53H3F WTH 0 MNTRO ANALVSJ
A5»B20 MUM V'ST TRTMNT FAC
A56p2n WST TPF.AT OPS^MAIMT
ATXngn STANDARDS f- f'EPULAT
TOIAL WATEH (JUALITY
A70C2D PWSS PMOORAM AST
4TIC2!' UNOEH6 1"J CMTL PHO
TOTAL ORINKino taATEH
01H1
tiooo
182.9
ZH2.1
7U.2
5*3.2
330.4
301.0
25.4
SB. 6
U.I
67.5
13U.O
400. H
36.1
46.6
Ii436.5
106.6
bt, <»
169. U
OTK2
1100U
146.6
223.8
62.6
433.0
280.4
241.0
20.3
46.9
9.8
54.2
110.4
320.0
2B.3
37.2
lilOV.3
flb.3
49. V
135. 2
1986
UTH3
S1000
129.0
190.3
54. 9
374.2
241.4
212.1
18.0
41.4
2.7
4.8
97.2
2H2.5
24,9
8.8
933. H
/5.0
44.0
119.0
OPERA
UTR4
»1000
53.2
248. a
66.9
368.9
226.9
181.1
40.9
149.8
2.7
5.5
29.8
430.1
32.3
7.6
Itl06.7
133.8
1MI.O
293. h
TING PLAN
TOTU6
S1000 OC Mt
511.7
945.0
262.6
U719.3
Ii099.1
935.2
104.6
296.7
27.3
132.0
375.4
1*434.2
121.6
100.2
4,626.3
400.7
316.3
717. 0
PME
15.6
?2.6
7.4
45.6
27.2
24.9
2.5
4.2
1.4
3.9
6.1
30.6
2.5
3.4
1U6.7
b.5
4.5
13.0
OPFTE
7
1.4
2
?.3
6.0
?.V
1.2
1.0
4.2
6.2
1
5
22.1
l.n
1.5
2.S
TOTPTt
16.3
24.0
7.6
47.9
33.2
27. B
2.5
5.4
1.4
4.9
10.3
36. B
2.6
3.9
12H.8
9.5,
h.l)
15.5
I'1*- 'I'-'/'ll •'(
•>V-i) 1-1.f-.
"I !".M I /!-(!
-------
OUTPUT
DV-01-H6 HHIS A-b
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPROVED OPERATING PLAN
AH 01 HA PEHlON 1 BOSTON HY ALLOWANCE HOLDERS
SALARIES AND EXPENSES (H6-NOA)
(•'!!OGHAM SUH-ELE!tE.III FY1986 OPERATING PLAN
OU iJT'M
M'fiHtp TITLE CODE »iuoo
AFOajH PtWilIf ISSUANCE B307 3b0.4
AFtHJA WATEH UUAL ENFORCEMENT B304 301.0
fOIAL WATER DUALITY 651.4
AFH/ijA STAT SUCE ENF A306 1H2.9
TOlAL AP* 182.9
AFIU::»A PLSUCIUFS ENFORCED E306 5i,4
o
ro TolAL PfcSMCtUES 51.4
OJ
AFLL3A TOX S'JH FUFWCHFNT LJOb 70.6
TOIAL TuXlC SUHSTAMCES. '0,6
AOUDJA HA; w$i ENF - os-Tn ojo^ lb6,5
fOIAL HA/AllDOI'S WASIK 15^.5
AOVM2H tHJU.iGE ANO FILL H207 2S.4
TOlAL WAltP UDALIIY 2^.4
Aflgoz,, MEQs ODLNS . POL HW . .*0S
rOlAL HA7AHOOUS WASlF
AHAM^/1, WTK DUAL MANAOf »i»ui n?31 bM.f>
TOI^L "ATF.W '4UALIIY S'l.f.
$1000
280.4
241.0
521.4
146.6
146.6
41.1
41.1
56.6
56.6
121.5
121. b
20.3
20.3
46. y
46. SI
OTH3
MOOO
241.4
212.1
453.5
129.0
129.0
35.2
35.2
18.5
18,5
106.3
106,3
18.0
1H.O
41.4
'•1.4
OTR4
S1000
226.9
181.1
408.0
53.2
53.2
81.2
81.2
20.2
20.2
117.4
117.4
40.9
40.9
3.0
3.0
149. H
1*9. «
TOT86
S1000 PFTE
1.099.1 27.2
935.2 24.9
2*034.3 52.1
511.7 15.6
511.7 15.6
200.9 3.8
20R.9 3.H
165.9 4,4
165.9 4.4
501.7 14.6
501.7 14.6
104.6 2.5
104,6 2.5
3.0
3.u
2
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY J 985- 1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A
V8SAG1
Al
A1A
AD WAI A
CDUA1A
A9DA1A
C9DA1A
A9FA1A
C9FA1A
A9GA1A
C9GA1A
0 A9HAU
N> C9HA1A
AIB
ACMA1B
CCMA1B
A9NA1B
C9NA1B
A9QA1B
C9QA1B
A9RA1B
C9RA1B
A9SA1B
C9SA1B
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
AUTH DU/SUBOU
CODECS) COOES
99
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
ZG05
A104
A104
A104
A104
A104
A104
A 104
A104
A104
A104
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A
F
F
A
A
C
C
D
0
E
E
T
T
A
A
C
C
D
D
E
E
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
AIR
CENTER FOR ENVIR PO
RSRCH t DLPMT-AIR
OXIDANTS
ENV PR4EF OXDNT AIR
ENV PR4EF OXDNT AIR
SCI AS OXIDANTS AIR
SCI AS OXIDANTS AIR
MON SY4QA OXDTS AIR
MON SY4QA OXDTS AIR
HLTH EFF OXDNTS AIR
HLTH EFF OXDNTS AIR
ENV E4T OXIDNTS AIR
ENV E4T OXIDNTS AIR
HAZ AIR POLLUTANTS
STRAT MOD PROGRAM
STRAT MOD PROGRAM
SCI ASMT HZ AIR POL
SCI ASMT HZ AIR POL
MON S4QA HZ AIR POL
MON S4QA HZ AIR POL
HLTH EF HZ AIR POL
HLTH EF HZ AIR POL
ENV E4T HZ AIR POL
ENV E4T HZ AIR POL
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Air
Center For Environmental Pollution Control - MHO
Research and Development -Air
Oxidants
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Oxidants - Air
Environmental Processes 4 Effects - Oxidants - Air
Scientific Assessment - Oxidants - Air
Scientific Assessment - Oxidants - Air
Monitoring Systems 4 Quality Assurance - Oxidants - Air
Monitoring Systems 4 Quality Assurance - Oxidants - Air
Health Effects - Oxidants - Air
Health Effects - Oxidants - Air
Environmental Engineering 4 Technology - Oxidants - Air
Environmental Engineering 4 Technology - Oxidants - Air
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Stratospheric Modification Program
Stratospheric Modification Program
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Air Pollutants - Air
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Air Pollutants - Air
Monitoring Systems 4 Quality Assurance - Hazardous Air Pollutants
Monitoring Systems 4 Quality Assurance - Hazardous Air Pollutants
Health Effects - Hazardous Air Pollutants - Air
Health Effects - Hazardous Air Pollutants - Air
Environmental Engineering 4 Technology - Hazardous Air Pollutants
Environmental Engineering 4 Technology - Hazardous Air Pollutants
- Air
- Air
- Air
- Air
A9TA1B 10 SE
A109 F
ENV P4E HZ AIR POL Environmental Processes 4 Effects - Hazardous Air Pollutants - Air
» INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
o
1
NJ
Ln
OUTHUI
ny-i)i-«!fi MMIS A-2
U.'.'ITtU STnrt'.i Ki.VII'UiJf-'tNTAL PKOTtCTfON AOf'CY
AI'HKOVtl) 'IHt.HA! IN(i PLAN
AH 01 HA :»K,-JIM,, l ivistO'-l bf ALL 'J»' A'JtF. HULUfcHS *. ObJtCI CLASS
SALArf(t-.S «. F*i't.''r>S
PKU'irfV-i S'Ui-f.l.fc'iMir t-YlVHb OI't«A H"<" PLA-M 1
ll'-'l UTH2 1TH3 UIH4 TU1K* 1 U(K1 U(U2 I.ITH3 U1H4 IOTH6
N"-.)»." IHLF -]0'i" 1.1000 tlony 41000 *100» POSITIONS POS PUS POS POS POS
AFi«A}A 01 .»U •>!»! SUCt t.'il (Bh-NOM
41 PfHS Ol'T N HF.HI 177. T 142.7 li!S.b 38.2 4H<».3
4^ TI^»VtL PEVot'MALI S.n 3.9 3.b 12.0 24,4
4J |l>A:JS!"J»TAno.'H
44 WfNT COMM \ UTILI
4S PHltlT N MfcPi'Oni
46 OTrtKH CONFW SEHVI 3.0 3.0
*l S'Jfi'LlES '. MAU.PI
4d EOUH'MKi-1! I
4-< LANU H STIH'CI'IIM
50 IMSUK CLAIM/INOEI
60 H A. 0 C\ JA(3 A'5KKt!-1t"TSI
6J Aoli'Vnm'RArTsl! '
70 RF.SKAHCH OKINTSl
71 DEMO GKAMT 1
7d O'lAriTS-Sf11 IK 1
7J O^AUTS-lTHtRI
•(OTAL 182.9 146.6 129.0 b3.2 511.7
A20A?L) 01 DJ AIM UU/IL MOT IMt'LE"1 (B6-NOA)
41 PURS CO'->P N HFNI ?5ft.7 ?n5.8 lbl.1 230.2 873.8
42 TRAVtL PEMSDMALI H.4 6.4 b.H tt.3 2B.9
43 f HANSPOWT* Tluni
44 RENT COMM N UriLI
4S PR I'M s Rt.lJ|*UI)l 11.9 7.6 19,5
45 OTI1KK CI'NlM SI-.HVI S, 1 4,0 1,4 10.3 22. B
4f SMHI'L'fS »• MflTfcHI
4d EWIJP'IENII
5 U INSI'R CLAIM/l'-HiFi
AO R 4 U C'J^TMACISl
61 lAli A'lKfcEME^TSI
(>i POOH COUTPAC(SI
6.1 Af)P CONTKACTSI ' '
70 RF.SFA'^CH RMANTSl
71 Oh MO KRAhtr 1
7? OI*AMrS-ST A If- 1
73 URAfiTS-JlMtRI
• ('MM. /•"<»,!
-------
APPENDIX D
-------
APPENDIX D
PLANNING AND CONTROL STRUCTURE
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
FY 1984-1986
APPENDIX TITLE
A-
A-
A-
A-
A-
A-
A-
A-
A-
A-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SOURCE OF FUNDING CODES AND TITLES
APPROPRIATION CODES AND- TITLES
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT) AND CODES
MEDIA CODES AND TITLES
FUNCTION CODES AND TITLES
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND COOES
(SEQUENCE BY MEDIA, FUNCTION, SUB-ACTIVITY)
RPIO/ALLCWANCE HOLDER CODES AND TITLES
APPROPRIATION AUTHORIZATION CODES 4 TITLES
NATIONAL PROGRAM MANAGER CODES 8 TITLES
RMIS OBJECT CLASS CODES AND TITLES
TABLE/CONTENTS
PAGE 1
-------
APPEM>IX 1
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SOURCE OF FUNDING CODES AND TITLES
FY 1984-1986
PM-225
01-25-85
CODE
TITLE
EFFECTIVE
YEAR
SHORT
TITLE
6 1966 HEW OSLIG AUTH
5 1985 NEW OBLIG AUTH
V 1984/1985 CARRYOVER
R NO-YEAR CARRYOVER
A 1981 SF CARRYOVER
U 1982 SF CARRYOVER
M 1983 SF CARRYOVER
4 1984 NEW OBLIG AUTH
K 1983/1984 CARRYOVER
M NO-YEAR CARRYOVER
P 1981 SF CARRYOVER
0 1982 SF CARRYOVER
(FY1986) (86-NOA)
(FY1985)
(FY1985)
(FY1985)
(FY1985)
(FY1985)
(FY1985)
(FY1984)
(FY1984)
(FY1984)
(FY1934)
(FY1984)
( 65-NOA )
( 84-C/O )
(NY-C/0)
(81S-C/0)
(82S-C/0)
( 83S-C/0 )
( 84-NOA )
(83-C/O)
( NY-C/0)
(81S-C/0)
(62S-C/0)
o
K>
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
CODE
A
B
C
0
E
6
H
J
K
N
P
R
S
T
V
M
X
Y
Z
APPROPRIATION CODES AND
FY 1985-1986
TITLE
SALARIES & EXPENSES
ABATE CONTRL X COMPLIANCE
RESEARCH 8 DEVELOPMENT
BUILDINGS t FACILITIES
SCIENTIF ACTIVS OVERSEAS
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
OPRNS, RSRCH, & FACILITIES
ABATE , CONT2COMP-C/0
RSRCH & DEVELOP-C/0
BLD6S & FACILS-C/0
ABATE CCNTRL & COMPLIANCE
HAZ SUB RESP-REIMB
HAZ SUB RESP-C/0
HAZ SUB RESP TR FD
MISC CONTRIBUTED FDS
CONSOLID WORKING FD
REIMBURSEMENTS
REVOLVING FUND
ALLOCATION ACCOUNTS
TITLES
CODE
K
M
L
3
E
A
N
M
L
3
H
S
S
S
V
P
G
01-25-85
FMS OMB/CONGR
SYMBOL 11-DIGIT ID CODE
6850200 6S020001304
685/60108 68010801304
685/60107 68010701999
68X0110 68011001304
68X0104 68010401304
68X0103 68010301304
68X0100 68010001304
684/50108 68010801304
684/50107 68010701304
68X0110 68011001304
68X0108 68010801304
68-20X8145 20814507304
68-20X8145 20814507304
68-20X8145 20814507304
68X8741 68374107304
6813912 68391204304
6850200
68X4311 68431103304
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
AADA1D
CADA1D
AAFAID
CAFA1D
AAGA1D
CAGA1D
AAHA1D
CAHA1D
AAMB1A
CAMB1A
AAPB1A
CAPS 1 A
AAQB1A
CAQB1A
AARB1A
CARB1A
AATB1A
CATB1A
AAVB1B
AAYB1B
CAYB1B
AAZB1B
CAZB1B
ABEB1C
CBEB1C
ABGB1C
CBGB1C
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) CODES
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SJ
SJ
SJ
SJ
SJ
SK
SK
SK
SK
A119
A119
A119
A119
A119
A119
A119
All?
B107
B107
B107
B107
B107
B107
B107
B107
B107
B107
B113
B113
B113
B113
B113
B116
B116
B116
B116
A
A
C
C
0
D
E
E
A
A
C
C
D
D
F
F
H
H
A
D
D
E
E
C
C
E
E
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
SCI AS GAS&PART AIR
SCI AS GAS&PART AIR
MON SY&QA GS&PT AIR
MON SY&QA GS&PT AIR
HLTH EFF GS&PRT AIR
HLTH EFF GS&PRT AIR
ENV E&T GS&PART AIR
ENV E&T GS&PART AIR
SCI ASSESS WTR QUAL
SCI ASSESS WTR QUAL
MON SY&QA WQ
MON SY&QA WQ
HLTH EFFCT WTR QLTY
HLTH EFFCT WTR QLTY
ENV PROC&EFF WTR QU
ENV PROC&EFF WTR QU
GREAT LAKES RESRH W
GREAT LAKES RESRH W
SCI ASSMNT MW -WQ
HEALTH EFF MW - WQ
HEALTH EFF MW - WQ
ENV ENG&TE MW - WQ
ENV ENG&TE MW - WQ
MON SY&QA IND WW-WQ
MON SY&QA IND WW-WQ
ENV E&T IND WSTW-WQ
ENV E&T IND WSTW-WQ
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Scientific Assessment - Gases and Particles - Air
Scientific Assessment - Gases and Particles - Air
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Gases ft Particles-Air
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Gases ft Particles-Air
Health Effects - Gases ft Particles - Air
Health Effects - Gases ft Particles - Air
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Gases ft Particles - Air
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Gases ft Particles - Air
Scientific Assessment - Water Quality
Scientific Assessment - Water Quality
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Water Quality
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Water Quality
Health Effects - Water Quality
Health Effects - Water Quality
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Water Quality
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Water Quality
Great Lakes Research - Water Quality
Great Lakes Research - Water Quality
Scientific Assessment - Municipal Wastewater - Water Quality
Health Effects-Municipal Wasteuater - Water Quality
Health Effects-Municipal Wastewater - Water Quality
o
Environmental Engineering & Technology-Municipal Wasteuater - Water Qual
Environmental Engineering & Technology-Municipal Wasteuater - Water Qual
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Industrial Wasteuater -
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Industrial Wasteuater -
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Industrial Wasteuater -
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Industrial Wasteuater -
Water Q
Water Q
Water Q
Water Q
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-65
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
ABHB1C
ABJC1A
CBJC1A
ABLC1A
CBLC1A
ABMC1A
CBMC1A
ABNC1A
CBNC1A
ABPC1A
CBPC1A
ABRD1A
CBRD1A
KBRD1A
ABSD1A
CBSD1A
ABT01A
CBTD1A
ABVD1A
CBVD1A
ABWD1A
CBWD1A
KBWD1A '
ABXE1A
CBXE1A
ABZE1A
CBZE1A
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 •'-
10
10
10"
10
10
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODEJS) CODES
SK
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SN
SN-"-
SN
SN
B116
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
D109
D109
0109
0109
0109
0109
D109
D109
D109
0109
D109
D109
E104
E10*
E10*
£10*
F
A
A
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
E
E
E
C
C
A
A
D
D
F
F
F
A
A
C
C
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
ENV PSE IND WSWT WQ
SCI ASSESS DRKG WTR
SCI ASSESS DRKG WTR
MON SYSSQLY ASSU DW
MON SYSSQLY ASSU DW
HEALTH EFF DRKG WTR
HEALTH EFF DRKG WTR
ENV ENG t TECH DW
ENV ENG t TECH DW
ENV PROSEF DRKG WTR
ENV PROSEF DRKG WTR
ENV ENGSTECH HAZ WS
ENV EUGSTECH HAZ WS
ENV ENGSTECH HAZ WS
MON SYS & QA-HW
MON SYS & QA-HW
SCI ASSESS HAZ WSTE
SCI ASSESS HAZ WSTE
HLTH EFF HAZ WSTE
HLTH EFF HAZ WSTE
ENV PROSEFF HAZ WST
ENV PROSEFF HAZ WST
ENV PROSEFF HAZ -WST
SCI ASSEMENT - P£ST '
SCI ASSEMENT - PEST
MON SYSSQ ASSU PEST"
MON SYSSQ ASSU PEST
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Environmental Processes & Effects - Industrial Hastewater - Hater Qualit
Scientific Assessment - Drinking Water
Scientific Assessment - Drinking Water
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Drinking Mater
Monitoring Systems t Quality Assurance - Drinking Water
Health Effects - Drinking Water
Health Effects - Drinking Water
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Drinking Water
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Drinking Water
Environmental Processes S Effects - Drinking Water
Environmental Processes t Effects - Drinking Water
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Hazardous Waste
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Hazardous Waste
Environmental Engineering S Technology - Hazardous Waste
Monitoring Systems t Quality Assurance - Hazardous Waste
Moni tor ing Systems & Quality Assurance - Hazardous Waste
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Waste
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Waste
Health Effects - Hazardous Waste
Health Effects - Hazardous Waste
Environmental Processes & .Effects - Hazardous Waste
Environmental 'Processes S'. Effects - Hazardous Waste
Environmental Processes S Effects - Hazardous Waste
Scientific Assessment - Pesticides '
Sc i ent i f i c ;AssessWeht - PCS t i e i des
Monitoring Systems t Quality Assurance-Pesticides
Mon.i tor i/>g Systems S Quality Assurance-Pesticides
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCT Nt-m
•l-t*-«S
PROGRAM
CODE
ACAE1A
CCAE1A
ACBE1A
CCBE1A
ACFF1A
CCFF1A
ACGF1A
CC6F1A
ACHH1A
CCHH1A
ACMA1B'
ACML1A
0 CCMA1B
ON CCML1A
ACPL1A
CCPL1A
ACRL1A
CCRL1A
ACSL1A
CCSL1A
ACTL1A
CCTL1A
ACUL1A
CCUL1A
ACVN1A
CCVN1A
KCVN1A
NPH
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
AUTH
CODE! SI
SN
SN
SN
SN
SP
SP
SP
SP
sq
sq
SE
SR
SE
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SM
SM
SM
OU/SUBDU
COOES
E104
E104
E104
E10*
F104
F104
F104
F104
H109
H109
A109
LI 04
A109
L104
L104
LI 04
L104
L104
L104
L104
L104
L104
L104
L104
N104
N104
N104
0
0
f
F
C
C
0
D
I
I
T
T
T
T
A
A
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
q
q
q
BUDGET/PROGRAfl
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
HEALTH EFFCT-PEST
HEALTH EFFCT-PEST
ENV PRO ft EF - PEST
ENV PRO ft EF - PEST
MON SYtQA NONIO RAO
HON SYftOA NONIO RAO
HLTH EFF NONION RAO
HLTH EFF NONION RAO
EXP RES CO PRG INTE
EXP RES CO PRG INTE
STRAT MOO PROGRAM
STRAT MOD CTftA TOX
STRAT MOO PROGRAM
STRAT MOD CTftA TOX
SCI ASSMT CTftA TOX
SCI ASSMT CTftA TOX
MON SYSQA CTSA - TS
MON SY*qA CTftA - TS
HLTH EFF - CTftA TOX
HLTH EFF - CT4A TOX
ENV EN&TEC CTJA TOX
ENV EN&TEC CT&A TOX
ENV PRO&EFF CT&A TS
ENV PRO&EFF CT&A TS
ACID RN MLTI-MED EN
ACID RN MLTI-MED EN
ACID RN MLTI-MED EN
STRUCTURE (BUKLEH SORT)
FT ietfr.|ea»
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONB TITLE
Health Effects - Pesticides
Health Effects - Pesticides
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Pesticides
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Pesticides
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Health Effects - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Health Effects - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Exploratory Research-Core Program - Interdisciplinary.
Exploratory Research-Core Program - Interdisciplinary
Stratospheric Modification Program
Stratospheric Modification - Chemicals Testing ft Assessment - Toxic Subs
Stratospheric Modification Program
Stratospheric Modification - Chemicals Testing ft Assessment - Toxic Subs
Scientific Assessment - Chemicals Testing ft Assessment - Toxic Substance
Scientific Assessment - Chemicals Testing ft Assessment - Toxic Substance
'Monitoring Systems ft quality Assurance - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-
Monitoring Systems ft quality Assurance - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-
Health Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment Toxic Substances
Health Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment Toxic Substances
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-T
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-T
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment - To
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment - To
Acid Rain - Multi-Media - Energy
Acid Rain - Multi -Media - Energy
Acid Rain - Multi-Media - Energy
ACYN1A 10 ST
N104 0
HLTH EFF MUL-MED EN Health Effects - Multi-Media-Energy
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
CCYN1A
ACZN1A
CCZN1A
CDAN1A
ADER5A
EDHA61
6DJM80
ADTA1D
CDTA1D
ADMA1A
CDMA 1 A
AOZS5A
TEDY1A
«GY1A
TEJY1A
TEKY1A
TENY5A
SEPY5A
TEPY5A
SERY5A
TERY5A
SETY5A
TETY5A
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
60
40
10
10
10
10
60
10
10
10
10
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
AUTH DU/SUBDU
COOE(S) COOES
ST
SS
SS
su
RH
99
BV.
SG
SG
SO
SD
99
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
N104
N104
N104
N104
R167
All?
A119
A104
A104
Y105
Y105
Y105
Y105
D
E
E
F
N
F
F
F
F
A
C
E
F
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
HLTH EFF MUL-MED EN
ENV E»T MULT-MED EN
ENV E&T MULT-MED EN
ENV P&E MLTI MED EN
PROGRAM MGT - ORD
SAO-INDIA-AIR
1981 CONSTR GRANTS
ENV P&E 6S&PART AIR
ENV P&E GS&PART AIR
ENV PR&EF OXDNT AIR
ENV PR&EF OXDNT AIR
OFF OF SMALL & OISA
SCI ASMENT-SUPERF
MON SYS&QLY AS SPFD
ENV ENG&TECH SUPERF
ENV PRO&EFF SUPERFU
HAZ SUB FIN MAT REG
HAZ SUB AOMN MGT HQ
HAZ SUB ADMN MGT HQ
HAZ SUB SUP SERV HQ
HAZ SUB SUP SERV HQ
HAZ SUB ADMN MGT RT
HAZ SUB ADMN MGT RT
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Health Effects - Multi -Madia-Energy
Environmental Engineering ft Technology Multi -Media-Energy
Environmental Engineering ft Technology Multi -Media-Energy
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Multi -Media Energy
PrograM Management - Research ft .Development
SAO-India-Air
1981 Construction Grants
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Gases and' Particles -
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Gases and Particles -
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Oxidants - Air
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Oxidants - Air
Office of Small ft Disadvantaged Business Utilization
Scientific Assessment - Superfund
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Superfund
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Superfund
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Superfund
Hazardous Substance Financial Management-Regions
PM-225
01-25-85
•
Air
Air
Hazardous Substance-Administrative Management - Headquarters
Hazardous Substance-Administrative Management - Headquarters
Hazardous Substance-Support Services - Headquarters
Hazardous Substance-Support Services-- Headquarters
Hazardous Substance-Administrative Management - Regions
Hazardous Substance-Administrative Management - Regions
INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
SEUY5A
TEUY5A
TEVY5A
SEWY5A
TEWY5A
TEYY5A
SFAY9A
TFAY9A
SFCY5A
TFCY5A
AFDB3B
BFDB3B
O
CO AFEB3A
BFEB3A
AFFC3A
AFHA3A
BFHA3A
BFJE3A
AFKE3A
BFKE3A
AFLL3A
BFLL3A
AFMA3B
BFMA3B
AFHH3A
BFHH3A
NPM
CODE
50
50
65
85
85
85
75
75
50
50
40
40
40
40
40
30
30
70
70
70
70
70
30
30
80
80
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODEtS) CODES
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
B4
B4
B4
B4
HA
DD
DO
EA
EA
EA
TB
TB
DD
DD
99
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
HAZ SUB SUP SERV RT
HAZ SUB SUP SERV RT
HAZ SUB INSPC GENRL
HAZ SUB LEG SERV HQ
HAZ SUB LEG SERV HQ
HAZ SUB LEG SERV RT
HAZ SPILL & SITE RE
HAZ SPILL » SITE RE
HAZ SUB-COMPTR SERV
HAZ SUB-COMPTR SERV
PERMIT ISSUANCE
PERMIT ISSUAIICE
WATER QUAL EHFORCEM
WATER QUAL EMFORCEM
DRINKING WATER ENFO
STAT SRCE EUF
STAT SRCE ENF
"PESTICIDES ENF GRAN
PESTICIDES EHFORCEM
PESTICIDES EHFORCEM
TOX SUB ENFRCMENT
TOX SUB EIIFRCMENT
MOBILE SRCE ENFCMHT
MOBILE SRCE EUFCMNT
TECH SUPP-OECM
TECH SUPP-OECM
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Hazardous Substance-Support Services - Regions
Hazardous Substance-Support Services - Regions
Hazardous Substance-Office of the Inspector General
Hazardous Substance-Legal Services - Headquarters
Hazardous Substance-Legal Services - Headquarters
Hazardous Substance Legal Services - Regions
Hazardous Spill & Site Response
Hazardous Spill £ Site Response
Hazardous Substance-Computer Services
Hazardous Substance-Computer Services
Permit Issuance
Permit Issuance
Water Quality Enforcement
Water Quality Enforcement
Drinking Water Enforcement
Stationary Source Enforcement
Stationary Source Enforcement
Pesticides Enforcement Grants
Pesticides Enforcement
Pesticides Enforcement
Toxic Substances Enforcement
Toxic Substances Enforcement
Mobile Source Enforcement
Mobile Source Enforcement
Technical Support-Office of Enforcement And Compliance Monitoring
Technical Support-Office of Enforcement And Compliance Monitoring
INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-65
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
SFZY3A
TFZY3A
SGBY3A
TGBY3A
AGDD3A
BGOD3A
AGKR5A
AGLR5A
AGMB2D
BGMB2D
AGQ02B
BGQD2B
JGCD2B
Jo AGRS5A
AGSS5A
AGTS5A
AGUS5A
TGVY5A
SGZY5A
TGZY5A
AHAX5A
AHBS5A
AHCS5A
AHDS5A
NPM
CODE
80
80
75
75
75
75
80
75
55
55
75
75
75
90
50
50
50
90
50
50
70
90
90
90
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) CODES
70
70
70
'70
GD
GO
99 -'
99
B4
BA B4
GE
GE
GE .
99
99
99
99
70
70
70
99
99
99
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
TECH SUPP-OECM
TECH SUPP-OECM
HAZ SUB TECH ENFORC
HAZ SUB TECH ENFORC
HAZ WST ENF - OSWER
HAZ WST ENF - OSWER
PROGRAM MGT - OECM
PROGRAM MGT - OSWER
DREDGE AND FILL
DREDGE AND FILL
REGS GDLNS i POL HW
REGS GDLNS t POL HW
REGS GDLNS t POL HW
PROGRAM MGT - OPPE
PROGRAM MGT - OARM
FINANCIAL MGT HQ
OFFICE OF THE COMPT
HAZ SUB OPPE
HAZ SUB FIN MGMT HQ
HAZ SUB FIN MGMT HQ
LAB SUPPORT - OPTS
PROGRAM INTEG PROJ
POLICY ANALYSIS
STANDARDS S REGULAT
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Hazardous Substance-Technical Support - Office of Enforcement And Contpli
Hazardous Substance-Technical Support - Office of Enforcement And Compli
Hazardous Substance Technical Enforcement
Hazardous Substance Technical Enforcement
Hazardous Waste Enforcement - Office of Solid Waste ft Emergency
Hazardous Waste Enforcement - Office of Solid Waste & Emergency
Program Management - Enforcement And Compliance Monitoring
Program Management - Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Dredge and Fill
Dredge and Fill
Regulations i Guidelines & Policies-Hazardous Waste
Regulations) Guidelines t Policies-Hazardous Waste
Regulationst Guidelines t Policies-Hazardous Waste
Program Management - Policy, Planning And Evaluation
Program Management - Administration
Financial Management-Headquarters
Office of the Comptroller
Hazardous Substance-Office of Policy* Planning And Evaluation
Hazardous Substance-Financial Management - Headquarters
Hazardous Substance-Financial Management - Headquarters
Lab Support - Pesticides * Toxic Substances
Integrated Environmental Management Program
Office of Policy Analysis
Office of Standards & Regulations
Response
Response
» INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
AHES5A
AHFS5A
AHGS5A
GHHM80
GHNW80
GHPW80
GHQW80
GHRW80
GHSW30
AHTA2B
1 BHTA2B
0 AHUA2B
BHUA2B
AHVA2B
BHVA2B
AHMF2R
BHUF2R
AHXB2A
BHXB2A
AHYS5A
AHZL2S
BHZL2S
AJAH3A
BJAH3A
NPM
CODE
55
90
55
40
40
40
40
40
40
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
40
40
55
70
70
80
80
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) CODES
99
99
99
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
DD
DO
DD
DO
00
DD
99
99
B4
B4 BA
99
TB
TB
99
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
OFC/LEGISL ANALYSIS
MGMT SYS * EVALUATI
CONGRESSIONAL LIAIS
1982 CONSTR GRANTS
1982 RECOVER/1980
1982 RECOVER/1979
1982 RECOVER/1978
1982 RECOVER/1977
1982 RECOVER/CA
EMISS STD T A ftCHAR
EMISS STD T A &CHAR
TEST, TECH4ADMI SUP
TEST, TECH8ADMI SUP
EMMISS ft FUEL ECON
EMMISS X FUEL ECON
RAD ENV IMPACT ASM
RAD ENV IMPACT ASM
WTR QUAL MANAGEMENT
MTR QUAL MANAGEMENT
OFC OF PUBLIC AFFAI
TOXICS INTEGRATION
TOXICS INTEGRATION
ENF POLICY * OPRNS
ENF POLICY * OPRNS
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Office Of Legislative Analysis
Office of Management Systems ft Evaluation
Office Of Congressional Affairs
1982 Construction Grants
1982 Recoveries/1980 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/1979 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/1978 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/1977 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/Contract Authority
Emission Standards, Technical Assessment ft Characterization
Emission Standards, Technical Assessment ft Characterization
Testing, Technical ft Administrative Support
Testing, Technical ft Administrative Support
Emissions ft Fuel Economy Compliance
Emissions ft Fuel Economy Compliance
Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
Mater Quality Management
Mater Quality Management
Office of Public Affairs
Toxics Integration
Toxics Integration
Enforcement Policy ft Operations
Enforcement Policy ft Operations
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
SJBY3A
TJBY3A
AJFS5A
SJGY9C
TJGY9C
TJHY9C
SJJY9C
TJJY9C
TJKY9C
SJMY9C
TJMY9C
0 AJNL2S
1 BJNL2S
(—•
^ AJPL2S
BJPL2S
AJQL2S
BJQL2S
AJRE2M
BJRE2M
JJRE2M
AJSS5A
AJTS5A
AJWB1A
CJKB1A
AJXH1A
CJXH1A
NPM
CODE
80
80
60
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
60
60
10
10
10
10
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) COOES
70
70
99
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
EA
EA
EA
99
99
SH B107 E
SH B107 E
SQ H109 B
SQ H109 B
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
HAZ SUB- LEGAL ENFOR
HAZ SUB-LEGAL ENFOR
REGU INFO SER CENTE
INTERAG. SUPER-HHS
INTERAG. SUPER-HHS
INTERAG. SUPER-USCG
INTERAG SUP-JUSTICE
INTERAG SUP- JUSTICE
INTERAG. SUP-FEMA
INTERAG. SUP-NOAA
INTERAG. SUP-NOAA
CHEMICAL TESTING
CHEMICAL TESTING
EXISTING CHEM REV
EXISTING CHEM REV
NEW CHEMICAL REVIEW
NEW CHEMICAL REVIEW
GENERIC CHEM REV
GENERIC CHEM REV
GENERIC CHEM REV
OFFICE OF MGMT SERV
EXECUTIVE SUPPORT
ENV ENGINEER & TECH
ENV ENGINEER & TECH
TECHN INFORM LIAIS
TECHN INFORM LIAIS
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Hazardous Substance Legal Enforcement
Hazardous Substance Legal Enforcement
Regulatory Information Service Center
Interagency Super fund-Department of Health t Human Services
Interagency Superfund-Department of Health t Human Services
Interagency Super fund-United States Coast Guard
Interagency Superfund-Department of Justice
Interagency Superfund-Department of Justice
Interagency Superfund Federal Emergency Management Agency
Interagency Superfund National Oceanographic t Atmospheric Administratio
Interagency Superfund National Oceanographic * Atmospheric Administratio
Chemical Testing
Chemical Testing
Existing Chemical Review
Existing Chemical Review
New Chemical Review
New Chemical Review
Generic Chemical Review
Generic Chemical Review
Generic Chemical Review
Office of Management Services
Office Of Executive Support
Environmental Engineering t Technology
Environmental Engineering 8 Technology
Technical Information & Liaison
Technical Information & Liaison
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
AKKH2A
BKKH2A
TKLY9C
SKSY9C
SKUY5A
TKUY5A
AKVT5A
AKXE1A
CKXE1A
GLAW30
GLBW80
GLCW80
GLDWSO
5LEM80
GLFW80
GLGW80
GLHW80
ALKH1A
CLKH1A
ALLH1A
CLLH1A
SLMY9C
TLMY9C
NPM
CODE
55
55
75
75
50
50
50
10
10
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
10
10
10
10
75
75
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODEC S) CODES
99
99
70
70 70
70
70
99
SN E104 E
SN E104 E
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
Sq H109 C
Sq H109 C
SQ H109 A
SQ H109 A
70
70
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
NEPA COMPLIANCE
NEPA COMPLIANCE
INTERAG. SUP-DOI
FEMA-RELOCATION
HAZ SUB OC
HAZ SUB OC
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
ENV E&T PESTICIDES
ENV E&T PESTICIDES
1984 CG WSTE WTR TR
1984 STATE MGT AST
1984 CG INNOV TECH
1984 CG ALTERN TECH
1984 CG SMALL COMM
1984 CG ADVANCE ALW
1984 CG MQ MGT PLNG
1984 CG COMBINED SE
QUALITY ASSUR MGMT
QUALITY ASSUR MGMT
SCIENT ASSESS INTER
SCIENT ASSESS INTER
INTERAG. SUP-OSHA
INTERAG. SUP-OSHA
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
NEPA Compliance
NEPA Compliance
Interagency Superfund Department of Interior
Interagency Superfund-FEMA-Relocation
Hazardous Substance Office of the Comptroller
Hazardous Substance Office of the Comptroller
Resource Management - Regions
Environmental Engineering And Technology - Pesticides
Environmental Engineering And Technology - Pesticides
1984 Construction Grants Waste Mater Treatment
1984 State Management Assistance
1984 Construction Grants Innovative Technology
1984 Construction Grants Alternative Technology
1984 Construction Grants Small .Communities
1984 Construction Grants Advance of Allowance
1984 Construction Grants Mater Quality Management Planning
1984 CG Combined Sewer Overflow
Quality Assurance Management
Quality Assurance Management
Scientific Assessment Interdisciplinary
Scientific Assessment Interdisciplinary
Interagency Superfund Occupational Safety 4 Health Administration
Interagency Superfund Occupational Safety & 'Health Administration
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
TLNY9A
RLPK9C
RLPY9C
CLQD1A
ALSR5A
ALTR5A
XLUF10
ALVS5A
GLWW80
TLXY5A
0 TLZY9A
1
£ GMAW80
GMBU80
GMCW80
GMDU80
GMEW80
GMFW80
GMGM80
GMHW80
GMJW80
AMKS5A
NPM
CODE
75
75
75
10
55
85
10
60
40
10
75
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) CODES
70
70
70
SM D109 R
99
99
99 F104 C
99
BV
70 Y517 N
70
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
MULTI-MEDIA SUPPORT
HAZ SUB RESP-IAG RE
HAZ SUB RESP-IAG RE
INTEGR HAZ WSTE RSR
PROGRAM MGT - OEA
PROGRAM MGT - OGC
LAS VEGAS OFFSITE R
REGIONAL OPER-EXEC
CG UNISSUED RECOVER
HAZ SUB ORO-LAB SUP
HAZ SUB RESP SUPPLM
1985 CG WSTE WTR TR
1985 STATE MGT AST
1985 CG INNOV TECH
1985 CG ALTERN TECH
1985 CG SMALL COMM
1985 CG ADVANCE ALW
1985 CG WQ MGT PLNG
1985 CG MARINE BAY
1985 CG COMBINED SE
OFC HUMAN RES MGT
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Multi -media Support
Interagency Reimbursables - Hazardous Substance Response
Interagency Reimbursables - Hazardous Substance Response
Integrated Hazardous Waste Research
Program Management - External Affairs
Program Management - General Counsel
Las Vegas Radiation Off site Reimbursables
Office of Regional Operations
Construction Grants Unissued Recoveries
Hazardous Substance Office of Research and Development - Lab Support
Hazardous Substance Response Supplemental
1985 Construction Grants Waste Water Treatment
1985 State Management Assistance
1985 Construction Grants Innovative Technology
1985 Construction Grants Alternative Technology
1985 Construction Grants Small Communities
1985 Construction Grants Advance of Allowance
1985 Construction Grants Water Quality Management Planning
1985 CG Combined Sewer Overflow
1985 Construction Grants Marine Bay & Estuary Special
Office of Human Resources Management
« INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-65
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
AMLB2F
BMLB2F
AMMC2E
BMMC2E
CMRB1F
JMSL2C
BMUD2C
BMVD2C
GMWM80
JMXL2C
JMYL2C
AMZD2B
BMZD2B
ANAD2B
BNAD2B
BNCD2C
A1DF2D
A1PH2A
B1PH2A
A11A2A
B11A2A
A12A2A
B12A2A
NPM
CODE
40
40
40
40
40
70
75
75
40
70
70
30
30
40
40
75
30
55
55
30
30
30
30
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) COOES
BA
BA
99
"99
BA
FA
GE
GE
BV
FA
TB
GE
GE
GE
GE
GW
99
DD
DD
DD
DD
00
DD
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
COMPREH ESTUARINE M
COMFREH ESTUARINE M
GROUNDWATER PROTECT
GROUNDWATER PROTECT
COMP. ESTU. MGT
"ASBESTOS/SCHOOL ALG
*HAZ WST MGT INIT GR
»HAZ WST MGT COMP GR
1985 CG UNISSUED RE
"ASBESTOS/SCHOOL PA
"ASBESTOS/SCHOOL CC
RCRA REG. PROG-OAR
RCRA REG. PROG-OAR
RCRA REG. PROG-OW
RCRA REG. PROG-OW
•UNDRGRD STORAGE TAN
RAD PROG IMPLMNTION
FED AGENCIES COMPL
FED AGENCIES COMPL
EMIS STDS8TECH ASMT
EMIS STDSSTECH ASMT
POL STRAT8AIR ST DE
POL STRATSAIR ST DE
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
Ground-Water Protection
Ground-Water Protection
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
Asbestos In School - Abatement Loan And Grants
Hazardous Waste Management Initiative Grants
Hazardous Waste Management Compliance Grants
Construction Grants Recoveries
Asbestos In School - Program Administration
Asbestos In School - Certification of Contracts
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Air and Radiation
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Air and Radiation
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Mater
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Mater
Underground Storage Tanks State Grants
Radiation Program Implementation
Federal Agencies Compliance
Federal Agencies Compliance
Emission Standards t Technology Assessment
Emission Standards & Technology Assessment
Pollutant Strategies & Air Standards Development
Pollutant Strategies & Air Standards Development
A13A2A 30 DD
ST PRG GDLNS® OE State Program Policy Guidelines & Regulations Development
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
B13A2A
B17A2C
A18A2C
B18A2C
A2TR5A
A2UR5A
A2VR5A
A2XT5A
A2YS5A
A20A2D
B20A2D
1 A23A2F
£ B23A2F
A24A2F
B24A2F
A3AS5A
A30S5A
A3ES5A
A3HS5A
A3JS5A
A3KS5A
A3LX5A
NPM
CODE
30
30
30
30
30
40
70
85
85
30
30
30
30
30
30
65
60
60
60
60
55
50
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) COOES
DD
DD
DD
DO
99
99
99
99
99
DD
DD
DD
DO
DD
DD
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
ST PRG GDLNS® DE
*CON AGCY RES SEC105
TRAINING
TRAINING
PROGRAM MGT - OAR
PROGRAM MGT - OH
PROGRAM MGT - OPTS
REGIONAL COUNSEL
GENERAL COUNSEL
AIR QUAL MGT IMPLEM
AIR QUAL MGT IMPLEM
AMBIENT AIR Q MNTRG
AMBIENT AIR Q MNTRG
AQSEMIS DATA ANALYS
AQSEMIS DATA ANALYS
OFF OF INSPECTOR GE
IMMED OFC OF ADMIN
ADMINR'S REP FUND
INTERNTL ACTIVITIES
CIVIL RIGHTS
OFFICE OF FEDRL ACT
PROFESSIONAL TRAINI
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
State Program Policy Guidelines & Regulations Development
Control Agency Resource Supplementation (Section 105 Grants)
Training
Training
Program Management - Air And Radiation
Program Management - Mater
Program Management - Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Regional Counsel
Office Of General Counsel
Air Quality Management Implementation
Air Quality Management Implementation
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Air Quality S Emissions Data Management & Analysis
Air Quality & Emissions Data Management & Analysis
Office of Inspector General
Immediate Office Of The Administrator
Administrator's Representation Fund
Office of International Activities
Office of Civil Rights
Office of Federaj. Activities
Professional Trai in.-
» INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PH-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A3MS5A
A3NS5A
A3QS5A
A3RS5A
A3VS5A
A3WS5A
A3XT5A
A3YT5A
A3ZT5A
A4AT5A
A4BT5A
A4CX5A
H4CX5A
J4CX5A
K4CX5A
A4DX5A
A4EX5A
A4FX5A
A4GX5A
A4HX5A
D4JP4A
N4JP4A
NPM
CODE
60
60
50
50
50
50
60
90
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
10
30
50
50
50
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) CODES
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
RW R550 X
99
99
99
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
SCIENCE ADVISORY BO
ADMIN LAW JUDGES
PERS t ORG SERVICES
CONTRACTS GRNTS MGM
FAC t MGT SERVICES
INFO SYS & SERVICES
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
ANALYSIS * EVALUATI
FIN MANAGEMENT-REG
PERSONNEL MGMT-REG
AOMIN MGMT-REGIONS
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
HDQRS SUPPORT SERV
REG SUPPORT SERVIC
LAB SUPPORT - ORD
LAB SUPPORT - OAR
ADP SUPPORT COSTS
REPAIRS t IMPROVEME
REPAIRS 8 IMPROVEME
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Science Advisory Board
Office of Administrative Law Judges
Personnel and Organization Services
Contracts and Grants Management
Facilities & Management Services
Information Systems t Services
Regional Management
Planning > Evaluation & Analysis - Regions
Financial Management - Regions
Personnel Management - Regions
Administrative Management - Regions
Nationwide Support Services
Nationwide Support Services
Nationwide Support Services
Nationwide Support Services
Headquarters Support Services
Regional Support Services
Lab Support-Research & Development
Lab Support - Air And Radiation
Automated Data Processing Support Costs
Repairs & Improvements
Repairs & Improvements
« INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
D4KM4A
E4LK69
E4QB61
E4SB68
E4VD68
A42B2A
B42B2A
B43B2C
J43B2C
A44B2A
B44B2A
J44B2A
7 A46B2B
^ B46B2B
B47B2C
A49B2D
B49B2D
E5FH61
E5KR6Z
E5LR61
E5RR68
X5TA20
X5VB20
NPM
CODE
50
60
60
60
60
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
60
60
60
60
30
40
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) COOES
99
99
99
99
99
BA
BA BK
Bl BA
Bl
BA
BA
BA
B4
B4
BH
CA
CA
99
99
99
99
99
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
NEW FACILITIES
SAO UNDISTRIBUTED
SAO-INDIA-UATER QUA
SAO-PAKISTAN-WATER
SAO-PAKISTAN-SOLID
GREAT LAKES PROGRAM
GREAT LAKES PROGRAM
*CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM
"CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM
CHESAPEAKE BAY WQ S
CHESAPEAKE BAY WQ 5
CHESAPEAKE BAY WQ S
EFFLUNT STDS S GUID
EFFLUNT STDS & GUID
*CON AGCY RES SEC106
OCEAN DISPOSAL PERM
OCEAN DISPOSAL PERM
SAO-INDIA-INTERDISC
NSF TRANSFER FUNDS
SAO-INDIA-OIA TRAVE
SAO-PAKISTAN-OIA TR
AIR REIMBURSABLES
OIL/HAZ SUB REV FUN
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
New Facilities
SAO Undistributed
SAO-India-Water Quality
SAO-Paki stan-Mater Quality
SAO-Pakistan-Solid Waste
Great Lakes Program
Great Lakes Program
Clean Lakes Program
Clean Lakes Program
Chesapeake Bay Program
Chesapeake Bay Program
Chesapeake Bay Program
Effluent Standards 6 Guidelines
Effluent Standards & Guidelines
Control Agency Resource Supplementation (Section 106)
Ocean Disposal Permits
Ocean Disposal Permits
SAO-India-Interdisciplinary
NSF Transfer Funds
SAO-India-OIA Travel
SAO-Pakistan-OIA Travel
Air Reimbursables
Oil/Hazardous Substances Revolving Fund-Coast Guard
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
oo
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-65
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
X5XB20
A51B20
B51B2D
A53B2F
B53B2F
A54B2G
B54B2G
P54B2G
A56B2G
X6EH10
X6FH20
X6JK10
X6LK50
X6PS50
X6QK50
X6QS50
Y6TE20
Z6UBAO
A6ZH2H
A63C2B
B63C2B
B65C2C
B66C2C
NPM
CODE
40
75
75
40
40
40
40
40
40
10
50
10
50
50
50
50
70
40
50
40
40
40
40
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) CODES
99
B4
B4
BA
BA
B4
BB B4
BB
B4
99 F104 C
99
99 F104 C
99
99
99
99
EA
99
99
HA
HA
HB
HC
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
WTR QUAL REIMBURSAB
ENV EMER RES ft PREV
ENV EMER RES ft PREV
WTR Q MNTRG ANALYSI
WTR Q MNTRG ANALYSI
MUN WST TRTMNT FAC
MUN WST TRTMNT FAC
MUN WST TRTMNT FAC
WST TREAT OPS*MAINT
INTERDISC REIMB/ORD
DISASTER ASSISTANCE
ORD UNISSUED REIMB
AGENCY MGT. UNISSUE
ADP STORET ACS/AGCY
AGENCY MGT. REIMBMT
AGENCY MGT. REIMBMT
TOLERANCE PETITIONS
APPALACHIAN REGIONA
EPA DISASTER AST
CRIT, STDS * GDLNS
CRIT, STDS t GDLNS
*PUB WTR SYS SUP PRO
*UN&ER INJ CON PRO G
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Water Quality Reimbursables
Environmental Emergency Response & Prevention
Environmental Emergency Response & Prevention
Water Quality Monitoring & Analysis
Water Quality Monitoring & Analysis
Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction
Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction
Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction
Waste Treatment Operations & Maintenance
Interdisciplinary Reimbursable/ORD
Disaster Assistance
ORD Unissued Reimbursables
Agency Management Unissued Reimbursables
ADP Storet Access/All Agencies
Agency Management Reimbursements
Agency MGT Reimbursements
Tolerance Petitions
Appalachian Regional Commission
EPA Disaster Assistance
Criteria, Standards & Guidelines
Criteria, Standards & Guidelines
Public Water Systems Supervision Program Grants.
Underground Injection Control Program Grants
» INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
B67C2C
G7AW80
G7BW80
G7DW30
A7XB20
B7XB2D
E7ZL61
A70C2D
A71C2D
B77D2C
A8RS5A
O
i- V8SAG1
VO
B8TL3A
B8UH2C
B8XE3A
A80020
B80020
M9AN1B
A90A1A
C9DA1A
A9FA1A
C9FA1A
NPM
CODE
40
40
40
40
40
40
60
40
40
75
55
10
70
10
70
75
75
10
10
10
10
10
AUTH OU/SUBDU
CODECS) CODES
HA
BV
BV
BV
B4
B4
99
HA
HA
GF
99
99 ZG05 A
TB
99 H240 I
EA
GD
GO GS
ST N109 D
SO A104 A
SD A104 A
SD A104 C
SD A104 C
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
•SPEC STUDYS ft DEMO
WASTE TRMT CG 67/72
WASTE TRMT CG REIMB
WASTE TRMT CG PWEA
STANDARDS * REGULAT
STANDARDS ft REGULAT
SAO - TS - INDIA
PWSS PROGRAM AST
UNDERG INJ CNTL PRO
«HAZ WST MGT FIN AST
OFC INTERGOV LIAISO
CENTER FOR ENVIR PO
»TOXIC SUBST ENF GRT
INTERDISC TRAIN GRT
"PESTICIDES CERT TRG
HW MGT REG STRAT IM
HW MGT REG STRAT IM
ENERGY HLTH EFFECTS
SCI AS OXIDANTS AIR
SCI AS OXIDANTS AIR
MON SYSQA OXDTS AIR
MOM SYSQA OXDTS AIR
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Special Studies ft Demonstrations
Waste Treatment Construction Grants (1967-1972)
Waste Treatment Construction Grants (Reimbursable)
Waste Treatment Grants Public Works Employment Act
Standards ft Regulations
Standards ft Regulations
SAO - TS - India
Public Water Systems Supervision Program Assistance
Underground Injection Control Program
Hazardous Waste Management Financial Assistance To
Office of Intergovernmental Liaison
Center For Environmental Pollution Control - WHO
Toxic Substances Enforcement Grants
Interdisciplinary Training Grants
Pesticides Certification ft Training
PM-225
01-25-85
States
Hazardous Waste Management Regulatory Strategies Implementation
Hazardous Waste Management Regulatory Strategies Implementation
Health Effects - Oxidants - Energy
Scientific Assessment - Oxidants - Air
Scientific Assessment - Oxidants - Air
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Oxidants -
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Oxfdants -
Air
• Air
» INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A9GA1A
C9GA1A
A9HA1A
C9HA1A
A9NA1B
C9HA1B
A9QA1B
C9QA1B
A9RA1B
C9RA1B
A9SA1B
C9SA1B
A9TA1B
C9TA1B
tlj A9UA1C
0 C9UA1C
A9WA1C
C9WA1C
A9XA1C
C9XA1C
A9YA1C
C9YA1C
A92E2M
A93E2K
B93E2K
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
70
70
70
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODEC S) CODES
SO
SD
SD
SD
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
99
EA
EA
A10*
A10*
AID*
AID*
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
A109
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
D
D
E
E
A
A
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
A
A
C
C
D
D
F
F
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
HLTH EFF OXDNTS AIR
HLTH EFF OXDNTS AIR
ENV E&T OXIDNTS AIR
ENV E&T OXIDNTS AIR
SCI ASMT HZ AIR POL
SCI ASMT HZ AIR POL
MON S&QA HZ AIR POL
MON S&QA HZ AIR POL
HLTH EF HZ AIR POL
HLTH EF HZ AIR POL
ENV E&T HZ AIR POL
ENV E&T HZ AIR POL
ENV P&E HZ AIR POL
ENV P&E HZ AIR POL
SCI AS MOB SRC AIR
SCI AS MOB SRC AIR
MON S&QA MOB SRC AI
MON SXQA MOB SRC AI
HLTH EF MOB SRC AIR
HLTH EF MOB SRC AIR
ENV P&E MOB SRC AIR
ENV P&E MOB SRC AIR
SPEC REV-EIS PREPAR
REGISTRATION
REGISTRATION
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Health Effects - Oxidants - Air
Health Effects - Oxidants - Air
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Oxidants -
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Oxidants -
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Air Pollutants -
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Air Pollutants -
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Hazardous
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Hazardous
Health Effects - Hazardous Air Pollutants - Air
Health Effects - Hazardous Air Pollutants - Air
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Hazardous
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Hazardous
Environmental Processes & Effects - Hazardous Air
Environmental Processes & Effects - Hazardous Air
Scientific Assessment - Mobile Sources - Air
Scientific Assessment - Mobile Sources - Air
PM-225
01-25-85
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air Pollutants -
Air Pollutants -
Air Pollutants -
Air Pollutants -
Pollutants - Air
Pollutants - Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Mobile Sources Air
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Mobile Sources Air
Health Effects - Mobile Sources - Air
Health Effects - Mobile Sources - Air
Environmental Processes & Effects - Mobile Sources
Environmental Processes & Effects - Mobile Sources
Special Reviews-EIS Preparation
Registration
Registration
- Air
-Air
A9*E2K
70 EA
SPECIAL REGISTRATIO Special Registration
» INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
APPENDIX 3
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE (BUDELEM SORT)
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM NPM AUTH DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODE CODE CODECS) CODES SHORT TITLE LONG TITLE
A95E2K 70 EA TOLERANCES Tolerances
A99F2B 30 99 RAD CRIT,STDS«GDLNS Radiation Criteria, Standards ft Guidelines
B99F2B 30 99 RAD CRIT.STDS4GDLNS Radiation Criteria. Standards ft Guidelines
O
« INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
APPENDIX 4
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-2Z5
01-25-85
MEDIA CODES AND TITLES
FY 1985-1986
CODE TITLE
A AIR
B WATER QUALITY
C DRINKING WATER
D HAZARDOUS WASTE
E PESTICIDES
f RADIATION
G NOISE
H INTERDISCIPLINARY
K GENERAL
L TOXIC SUBSTANCES
M NEW FACILITIES
N ENERGY
P REPAIRS & IMPROVEMENTS
R PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
S AGENCY MANAGEMENT
T REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
» CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
X SUPPORT COSTS
Y SUPERFUND
O Z UNALLOC ACTIONS
I
N)
N>
-------
APPENDIX 5
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
FUNCTION CODES AND TITLES
FY 1985-1986
CODE TITLE
1 RESEARCH S DEVELOPMENT
2 ABATEMENT * CONTROL
3 ENFORCEMENT
4 FACILITIES
5 MANAGEMENT * SUPPORT
6 SCIEN ACTIV O'SEAS
7 U.S. REGULATORY COUNCIL
8 CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
9 HAZ SUB RESP ACTION
Z UNALLOC ACTIONS
O
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A
V8SAG1
Al
A1A
ADWA1A
CDMA 1 A
A9DA1A
C9DA1A
A9FA1A
C9FA1A
A9GA1A
C9GA1A
0 A9HA1A
iJj C9HAIA
-IN
A1B
ACMA1B
CCMA1B
A9NA1B
C9NA1B
A9QA1B
C9QA1B
A9RA1B
C9RA1B
A9SA1B
C9SA1B
A9TAIB
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
' 10
10
10
10
10
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) CODES
99
SO
SD
SD
SO
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
ZG05
A104
A 104
A104
A 10
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
C9TA1B
A1C
A9UA1C
C9UA1C
A9WA1C
C9WA1C
A9XA1C
C9XA1C
A9YA1C
C9YA1C
AID
AADA1D
C) CADA1D
1
S AAFA1D
CAFA1D
AAGA1D
CAGA1D
AAHA1D
CAHA1D
ADTA10
COTA1D
A2
A2A
A11A2A
B11A2A
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
30
30
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) CODES
SE
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
DD
OD
A109
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
All*
All?
All?
A119
All?
All?
All?
All?
All?
All?
All?
F
A
A
C
C
D
D
F
F
A
A
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
ENV PSE HZ AIR POL
MOBILE SOURCES
SCI AS MOB SRC AIR
SCI AS MOB SRC AIR
MON S8QA MOB SRC AI
MON S8QA MOB SRC AI
HLTH EF MOB SRC AIR
HLTH EF MOB SRC AIR
ENV P8E MOB SRC AIR
ENV P8E MOB SRC AIR
GASES ft PARTICLES
SCI AS GASftPART AIR
SCI AS GASSPART AIR
MON SY8QA GS8PT AIR
MON SY8QA GS8PT AIR
HLTH EFF GS8PRT AIR
HLTH EFF GSSPRT AIR
ENV E8T GSSPART AIR
ENV E8T GSSPART AIR
ENV PSE GSSPART AIR
ENV PSE GSSPART AIR
ABTMT 8 CNTRL-AIR
AIR QUAL ft STATNRY
EMIS STDS8TECH ASMT
EMIS STDSSTECH ASMT
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Hazardous Air Pollutants -
Mobile Sources
Scientific Assessment - Mobile Sources - Air
Scientific Assessment - Mobile Sources - Air •
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Mobile Sources Air
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Mobile Sources Air
Health 'Effects - Mobile Sources - Air
Health Effects - Mobile Sources - Air
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Mobile Sources - Air
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Mobile Sources - Air
Gases and Particles
Scientific Assessment - Gases and Particles - Air
Scientific Assessment - Gases and Particles - Air
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Gases 8 Particles-Air
Monitoring Systems 8 Quality Assurance - Gases 8 Particles-Air
Health Effects - Gases ft Particles - Air
Health Effects - Gases 8 Particles - Air
Air
Environmental Engineering 8 Technology - Gases ft Particles - Air
Environmental Engineering 8 Technology - Gases. 8 Particles - Air
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Gases and Particles - Air
Environmental Processes 8 Effects - Gases and Particles - Air
Abatement and Control - Air
Air Quality ft Stationary Source Planning ft Standards
Emission Standards ft Technology Assessment
Emission Standards ft Technology Assessment
A12A2A 30 DD
POL STRAT8AIR ST DE Pollutant Strategies ft Air Standards Development
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
B12A2A
A13A2A
B13A2A
A2B
AHTA2B
BHTA2B
AHUA2B
BHUA2B
AHVA2B
BHVA2B
A2C
O B17A2C
1
^ A18A2C
B18A2C
A2D
A20A2D
B20A2D
A2F
A23A2F
B23A2F
A24A2F
B24A2F
A20
X5TA20
NPM
CODE
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODEC S) COOES
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
OD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
99
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
POL STRAT&AIR ST DE
ST PRG GDLNSSREG DE
ST PRG GDLNSSREG DE
MOB SRC AIR POL CNTL
EMISS STD T A SCHAR
EMISS STD T A SCHAR
TEST, TECHSADMI SUP
TEST, TECHSADMI SUP
EMMISS ft FUEL ECON
EMMISS ft FUEL ECON
AIR ST PROG RES AST
*CON AGCY RES SEC105
TRAINING
TRAINING
AIR QUAL MGMT IMPLM
AIR QUAL MGT IMPLEM
AIR QUAL MGT IMPLEM
TRENDS MONITRG ft PR
AMBIENT AIR Q MNTRG
AMBIENT AIR Q MNTRG
AQ&EMIS DATA ANALYS
AQSEMIS DATA ANALYS
ASC - AIR REIMBSBLE
AIR REIMBURSABLES
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Pollutant Strategies ft Air Standards Development
PM-225
01-25-85
State Program Policy Guidelines ft Regulations Development
State Program Policy Guidelines ft Regulations Development
Mobile Source Air Pollution Control ft Fuel Economy
Emission Standards, Technical Assessment ft Characterization
Emission Standards, Technical Assessment ft Characterization
Testing, Technical ft Administrative Support
Testing, Technical ft Administrative Support
Emissions ft Fuel Economy Compliance
Emissions ft Fuel Economy Compliance
State Programs Resource Assistance
Control Agency Resource Supplementation (Section 105
Training
Training
Air Quality Management Implementation
Air Quality Management Implementation
Air Quality Management Implementation
Trends Monitoring ft Progress Assessment
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Air Quality ft Emissions Data Management ft Analysis
Air Quality ft Emissions Data Management ft Analysis
Abatement ft Control Air Reinbursables
Air Reimbursables
Grants )
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A3
A3A
AFHA3A
BFHA3A
A3B
AFMA3B
BFMA3B
A6
A61
EDHA61
B
Z6UBAO
? Bl
N> B1A
AAMB1A
GAMBIA
AAPB1A
CAPB1A
AAQB1A
CAQB1A
AARB1A
CARB1A
AATB1A
CATB1A
AJWB1A
CJWB1A
NPM AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE CODEC S) CODES
30 DO
30 DO
30 DO
30 DO
60 99
'•lO 99
10 SH B107 A
10 SH B107 A
10 SH B107 C
10 SH B107 C
10 SH B107 D
10 SH B107 D
10 SH B107 F
10 SH B107 F
10 SH B107 H
10 SH B107 H
10 SH B107 E
10 SH B107 E
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
ENFORCEMENT-AIR
STAT SRCE EHFORCEME
STAT SRCE ENF
STAT SRCE ENF
MOBILE SOURCE ENFOR
MOBILE SRCE ENFCMNT
MOBILE SRCE ENFCMNT
SAO - AIR QUALITY
INDIA
SAO-INDIA-AIR
WATER QUALITY
APPALACHIAN REGIONA
RSRCH * DVLPMT-WQ
WATER QUALITY RESRH
SCI ASSESS WTR QUAL
SCI ASSESS WTR QUAL
MON SYSQA WQ
MOH SYSQA WQ
HLTH EFFCT WTR QLTY
HLTH EFFCT WTR QLTY
ENV PROCSEFF WTR QU
ENV PROCSEFF WTR QU
GREAT LAKES RESRH W
GREAT .LAKES RESRH W
ENV ENGINEER & TECH
ENV ENGINEER & TECH
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Enforcement - Air
Stationary Source Enforcement
Stationary Source Enforcement
Stationary Source Enforcement
Mobile Source Enforcement
Mobi le Source Enforcement
Mobile Source Enforcement
SAO - Air Quality
India
SAO-India-Air
Water Quality
Appalachian Regional Commission
Research & Development -Water Quality
Water Quality Research
Scientific Assessment - Water Quality
Scientific Assessment - Water Quality
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance -
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance -
Health Effects - Water Quality
Health Effects - Water Quality
PM-225
01-25-85
Water Quality
Water Quality
Environmental Processes & Effects - Water Quality
Environmental Processes & Effects - Water Quality
Great LsKes Research - Water Quality
Great Lakes Research - Water Quality
Environmental Engineering $ Technology
Environmental Engineering & Technology
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
BIB
AAVB1B
AAYB1B
CAYB1B
AAZB1B
CAZB1B
B1C
ABEB1C
CBEB1C
ABGB1C
CBGB1C
ABHB1C
O
rl, B1F
oo
CMRB1F
B2
B2A
AHXB2A
BHXB2A
A42B2A
B42B2A
A44B2A
B44B2A
J44B2A
B2B
A46B2B
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) CODES
SJ B113 A
SJ Bill D
SJ B113 D
SJ B113 E
SJ B113 E
SK B116 C
SK B116 C
SK B116 E
SK B116 E
SK B116 F
BA
B4
B4 BA
BA
BA BK
BA
BA
BA
B4
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
MUH WASTEWATER
SCI ASSMNT MW -HQ
HEALTH EFF MM - HQ
HEALTH EFF MM - WQ
ENV ENG&TE MM - UQ
ENV ENG&TE MM - MQ
INDSTL WSTHTR
MON SY&QA IND HH-HQ
MON SY8QA IND WM-WQ
ENV EftT IND HSTH-HQ
ENV E*T IND WSTH-UQ
ENV P«E IND HSHT HQ
COMPRE. ESTU. MGT-R4D
COUP. ESTU. MGT
ABTMT & CNTRL-WQ
HTR QUAL MANAGEMENT
MTR QUAL MANAGEMENT
WTR QUAL MANAGEMENT
GREAT LAKES PROGRAM
GREAT LAKES PROGRAM
CHESAPEAKE BAY WQ S
CHESAPEAKE BAY MQ S
CHESAPEAKE BAY MQ S
EFFLUENT STDS & GUI
EFFLUNT STDS & GUID
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Municipal Hasteuater
Scientific Assessment - Municipal Uasteuater - Mater Quality
Health Effects-Municipal Uasteuater - Mater Quality
Health Effects-Municipal Masteuater - Mater Quality
Environmental Engineering & Technology-Municipal Wastewater - Mater Qual
Environmental Engineering & Technology-Municipal Masteuater - Hater Qual
Industrial Masteuater
Monitoring Systems S Quality Assurance - Industrial Masteuater
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Industrial Masteuater
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Industrial Masteuater
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Industrial Masteuater
- Hater Q
- Hater Q
- Hater Q
- Hater Q
Environmental Processes & Effects - Industrial Masteuater - Mater Qualit
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
Abatement and Control - Mater Quality
Mater Quality And Grants Program Management
Mater Quality Management
Mater Quality Management
Great Lakes Program
Great Lakes Program
Chesapeake Bay Program
Chesapeake Bay Program
Chesapeake Bay Program
Effluent Standards S Guidelines
Effluent Standards S Guidelines
» INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
B46B2B
B2C
B43B2C
J43B2C
B47B2C
B2D
AGMB2D
BGMB2D
A49B20
B49B2D
A51B2D
B51B2D
O
1 A7XB2D
Jo B7XB2D
B2F
AMLB2F
BMLB2F
A53B2F
B53B2F
B2G
A54B2G
B54B2G
P54B2G
A56B2G
B20
NPM
CODE
40
40
40
40
55
55
40
40
75
75
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODE(S) CODES
B4
Bl BA
Bl
BH
B4
BA B4
CA
CA
B4
B4
B4
B4
BA
BA
BA
BA
B4
BB B4
BB
B4
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
EFFLUNT STDS ft GUID
GRANTS ASST PROGRAMS
*CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM
*CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM
«CON AGCY RES SEC 106
HQ STRATEGIES IMPLM
DREDGE AND FILL
DREDGE AND FILL
OCEAN DISPOSAL PERM
OCEAN DISPOSAL PERM
ENV EMER RES ft PREV
ENV EMER RES ft PREV
STANDARDS ft REGULAT
STANDARDS ft REGULAT
Wq MMTRNG AND ANLYS
COMPREH ESTUARINE M
COMPREH ESTUARINE M
WTR q MNTRG ANALYSI
WTR q MNTRG ANALYSI
MUNICIPAL SRCE CONT
MUN WST TRTMNT FAC
MUN WST TRTMNT FAC
MUN WST TRTMNT FAC
WST TREAT OPSSMAINT
AftC - Wq ADV ft REIM
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Effluent Standards ft Guidelines
Grants Assistance Programs
Clean Lakes Program
Clean Lakes Program
Control Agency Resource Supplementation (Section 106)
Mater quality Strategies Implementation
Dredge and Fill
Dredge and Fill
Ocean Disposal Permits
Ocean Disposal Permits
Environmental Emergency Response ft Prevention
Environmental Emergency Response ft Prevention
Standards ft Regulations
Standards ft Regulations . •
Hater quality Monitoring ft Analysis
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
Water quality Monitoring ft Analysis
Water quality Monitoring ft Analysis
Municipal Source Control
Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction
Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction
Municipal Waste Treatment Facility Construction
Waste Treatment Operations ft Maintenance
Abatement ft Control - Water quality Advancements ft Reimbursables
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
PM-225
01-25-85
FY 1985-1986
O
U)
o
PROGRAM
CODE
X5VB20
X5XB20
B3
B3A
AFEB3A
BFEB3A
B3B
AFDB3B
BFDB3B
B6
B61
E4QB61
B68
E4SB68
C
Cl
CIA
ABJC1A
CBJC1A
ABLC1A
CBLC1A
ABMC1A
CBMC1A
ABNC1A
CBNC1A
NPM
CODE
40
40
40
40
40
40
60
60
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
AUTH
CODECS)
99
99
B4
B4
B4
B4
99
99
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
OIL/HAZ SUB REV FUN
HTR QUAL REIMBURSAB
ENFRCMNT-HTR QLTY
MTR QUAL ENFORCEMEN
HATER QUAL ENFORCEM
WATER QUAL ENFORCEM
MTR QUAL PRMT ISSNC
PERMIT ISSUANCE
PERMIT ISSUANCE
SAO - MATER QUALITY
INDIA
SAO- INDIA-MATER QUA
PAKISTAN
SAO-PAKISTAN-MATER
DRINKING MATER
RSRCH & DVLPMT-DW
DRINKING MTR RESRH
C104 A SCI ASSESS DRKG MTR
C104 A SCI ASSESS DRKG MTR
C104 C MON SYS&QLY ASSU DM
C104 C MON SYS4QLY ASSU DM
C104 D HEALTH EFF DRKG MTR
C104 D HEALTH EFF DRKG MTR
C104 E ENV ENS t TECH DM
C104 E ENV ENG * TECH DM
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Oil/Hazardous Substances Revolving Fund-Coast Guard
Mater Quality Reimbursables
Enforcement - Hater Quality
Mater Quality Enforcement
Mater Quality Enforcement
Mater Quality Enforcement
Hater Quality Permit Issuance
Permi t Issuance
Permit Issuance
SAO - Hater Quality
India
SAO-India-Hater Quality
Pakistan
SAO- Pakistan-Mater Quality
Drinking Hater
Research and Development-Drinking Mater
Drinking Mater Research
Scientific Assessment - Drinking Hater
Scientific Assessment - Drinking Mater
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance -
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance -
Health Effects - Drinking Hater
Health Effects - Drinking Hater
Environmental Engineering & Technology -
Environmental Engineering & Technology -.
Drinking Hater
Drinking Mater
Drinking Hater
Drinking Hater
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
APPENDIX 6
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 19S5-1986
PM-225
01-25-85
PROGRAM NPM AUTH DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODE CODE CODECS) CODES SHORT TITLE
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
ABPC1A 10 SL
CBPC1A 10 SL
C2
C2B
A63C2B 40 HA
B63C2B 40 HA
C2C
B65C2C 40 HB
B66C2C 40 HC
B67C2C 40 HA
C2D
0 A70C2D 40 HA
I
£ A71C2D 40 HA
C2E
AMMC2E 40 99
BMMC2E 40 99
C3
C3A
AFFC3A 40 HA
D
Dl
D1A
C104
C104
ENV PRO&EF DRKG WTR
ENV PR08EF DRKG WTR
ABTMT & CNTRL-DM
DM CRIT, STDS GDLNS
CRIT, STDS t GDLNS
CRIT, STDS & GDLNS
DM ST PRGM RES AST
*PUB WTR SYS SUP PRO
#UNDER INJ CON PRO 6
*SPEC STUDYS 4 DEMO
DRKG WTR MANAGEMENT
PWSS PROGRAM AST
UNDERG INJ CNTL PRO
GROUNDWATER PROTECTIO
GROUNDWATER PROTECT
GRCUNDWATER PROTECT
ENFRCMNT - DRKG WTR
DRKG WTR ENFORCEMEN
Environmental Processes t Effects - Drinking Water
Environmental Processes & Effects - Drinking Water
Abatement and Control - Drinking Water
Drinking Water Criteria, Standards & Guidelines
Criteria, Standards t Guidelines
Criteria, Standards t Guidelines
Drinking Water State Program Resource Assistance
Public Water Systems Supervision Program Grants
Underground Injection Control Program Grants
Special Studies * Demonstrations
Drinking Water Management
Public Water Systems Supervision Program Assistance
Underground Injection Control Program
Ground-Water Protection
Ground-Water Protection
Ground-Water Protection
Enforcement - Drinking Water
Drinking Water Enforcement
DRINKING WATER ENFO Drinking Water Enforcement
ABRD1A
CBRD1A
KBRD1A
10 SM
10 SM
10 SM
D109 E
D109 E
D109 E
HAZARDOUS WASTE
RES & DEV - HAZ WST
HAZARDOUS WST RESRH
ENV ENG8TECH HAZ WS
ENV ENGSTECH HAZ WS
ENV ENG&TECH HAZ W3
Hazardous Waste
Research and Development - Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste Research
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Hazardous Waste
Environmental Engineering & Technology -. Hazardous Waste
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Hazardous Waste
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
to
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-65
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND COOES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
ABSD1A
CBSD1A
ABTD1A
CBTD1A
ABVD1A
CBVD1A
ABHD1A
CBHD1A
KB WO 1 A
CLQD1A
02
D2B
AGQD2B
BGQ02B
JGQD2B
AMZD2B
BMZD2B
ANAD2B
BNAD2B
D2C
BMUD2C
BMVD2C
BNC02C
B77D2C
020
NPM
CODE
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
75
75
75
30
30
40
75
75
75
75
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) COOES
SM D109 C
SM 0109 C
SM 0109 A
SM 0109 A
SM 0109 0
SM 0109 0
SM 0109 F
SM 0109 F
SM . 0109 F
SM 0109 R
GE
GE
GE
GE
GE
GE
GE
GE
GE
GU
GF
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
MON SYS ft QA-HU
MON SYS ft QA-HU
SCI ASSESS HAZ HSTE
SCI ASSESS HAZ HSTE
HLTH EFF HAZ HSTE
HLTH EFF HAZ MSTE
ENV PROSEFF HAZ UST
ENV PR04EFF HAZ WST
ENV PRO&EFF HAZ UST
INTEGR HAZ HSTE RSR
ABMT ft CNTL - HZ US
HSTE MGT REGS ,GDLI
REGS GDLNS ft POL HH
REGS GDLNS ft POL HU
REGS GOLNS ft POL HM
RCRA REG. PROG-OAR
RCRA REG. PROG-OAR
RCRA REG. PROG-OH
RCRA REG. PROG-OH
FINANCIAL ASSISTANC
*HAZ HST MGT INIT GR
*HAZ HST MGT COMP GR
"UNDRGRD STORAGE TAN
»HAZ HST MGT FIN AST
HST MGMT STRT IMPLE
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Hazardous Haste
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Hazardous Haste
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Haste
Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Haste
Health Effects - Hazardous Haste
Health Effects - Hazardous Haste
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Hazardous Haste
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Hazardous Haste
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Hazardous Haste
Integrated Hazardous Haste Research
Abatement and Control - Hazardous Haste
Haste Management Regulations, Guidelines ft Policies
Regulations, Guidelines ft Policies -Hazardous Haste
Regulations, Guidelines ft Policies-Hazardous Haste
Regulations, Guidelines ft Policies-Hazardous Haste
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Air and Radiation
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Air and Radiation
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Hater
RCRA Regulatory Program - Office of Hater
Financial Assistance .
Hazardous Haste Management Initiative Grants
Hazardous Haste Management Compliance Grants
Underground Storage Tanks State Grants
Hazardous Haste Management Financial Assistance To States
Haste Management Strategies Implementation
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY . PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A80D2D
B80D2D
03
D3A
AGDD3A
BGDD3A
D6
D68
E4VD68
E
El
E1A
ABXE1A
CBXE1A
0 ABZE1A
^ CBZE1A
ACAE1A
CCAE1A
ACBE1A
CCBE1A
AKXE1A
CKXE1A
E2
E2K
A93E2K
B93E2K
NPM
CODE
75
75
75
75
60
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
70
70
AUTH DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODECS) CODES SHORT TITLE
GD
GD GS
GD
GD
99
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
EA
EA
HW MGT REG STRAT IM
HW MGT REG STRAT IM
ENFORCMNT - SOL WST
HAZ WST ENFORCEMENT
HAZ WST ENF - OSWER
HAZ WST ENF - OSWER
SAO - SOLID WASTE
PAKISTAN
SAO-PAKISTAN-SOLID
PESTICIDES
RES ft DEV - PESTCDE
PESTICIDES RESRCH
E104 A SCI ASSEMENT - PEST
El 04 A SCI ASSEMENT - PEST
El 04 C MON SYS&Q ASSU PEST
El 04 C MON SYS&Q ASSU PEST
E104 D HEALTH EFFCT-PEST
E104 D HEALTH EFFCT-PEST
E104 F ENV PRO ft EF - PEST
E104 F ENV PRO ft EF - PEST
E104 E ENV E«T PESTICIDES
E104 E ENV E*T PESTICIDES
ABMT ft CNTL - PEST
REG, SPCL REG ft TOL
REGISTRATION
REGISTRATION
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Hazardous Haste Management Regulatory Strategies Implementation
Hazardous Waste Management Regulatory Strategies Implementation
Enforcement-Solid Waste
Hazardous Waste Enforcement
Hazardous Haste Enforcement - Office of Solid Haste ft Emergency Response
Hazardous Haste Enforcement - Office of Solid Haste ft Emergency Response
SAO - Solid Haste
Pakistan
SAO-Pakistan-Solid Haste
Pesticides
Research and Development - Pesticides
Pesticides Research
Scientific Assessment - Pesticides
Scientific Assessment - Pesticides
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance-Pesticides
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance-Pesticides
Health Effects - Pesticides
Health Effects - Pesticides
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Pesticides
Environmental Processes ft Effects.- Pesticides
Environmental Engineering And Technology - Pesticides
Environmental Engineering And Technology - Pesticides
Abatement and Control - Pesticides
Registration, Special Registration t Tolerances
Registration
Registration
A94E2K 70 EA
SPECIAL REGISTRATIO Special Registration
« INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND COOES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A95E2K
E2M
AJRE2M
BJRE2M
JJRE2M
A92E2M
Y6TE20
E3
E3A
BFJE3A
AFKE3A
BFKE3A
B8XE3A
7 F
£ Fl
F1A
ACFF1A
CCFF1A
ACGF1A
CCGF1A
F10
XLUF10
F2
F2B
NPM
CODE
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
10
10
10
10
10
AUTH
CODECS)
EA
EA
EA
EA
99
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SP
SP
SP
SP
99
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
TOLERANCES
GEN CHEM REV-EIS
GENERIC CHEM REV
GENERIC CHEM REV
GENERIC CHEM REV
SPEC REV-EIS PREPAR
TOLERANCE PETITIONS
ENFORCEMENT - PEST
PESTICIDES ENFORCEM
"PESTICIDES ENF GRAN
PESTICIDES ENFORCEM
PESTICIDES ENFORCEM
"PESTICIDES CERT TRG
RADIATION
RES & DEV - RADTION
NONIONIZING RAD
F104 C MON SYSQA NONIO RAD
F10<4 C MON SY&QA NONIO RAD
F10<* D HLTH EFF NONION RAD
F104 D HLTH EFF NONION RAD
LAS VEGAS OFFSITE REI
F104 C LAS VEGAS OFFSITE R
ABTMT & CNTL - RAD
RAD CRIT, STDS & GU
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Tolerances
Generic Chemical Review
Generic Chemical Review
Generic Chemical Review
Generic Chemical Review
Special Reviews-EIS Preparation
Tolerance Petitions
Enforcement - Pesticides
Pesticides Enforcement
Pesticides Enforcement Grants
Pesticides Enforcement
Pesticides Enforcement
Pesticides Certification & Training
Radiation
Research and Development - Radiation
Non-Ionizing Radiation
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Monitoring Systems & Quality Assurance - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Health Effects - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Health Effects - Non-Ionizing Radiation
Research and Development - Radiation Reimbursables '
Las Vegas Radiation Offsite Reimbursables
Abatement and Control - Radiation
Radiation Criteria, Standards t Guidelines
A99F2B 30 99
RAD CRIT.STDS8GDLNS Radiation Criteria, Standards « Guidelines
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225.
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND COOES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
B99F2B
F20
A1DF2D
F2R
AHMF2R
BHWF2R
H
HI
H1A
ACHH1A
CCHH1A
AJXH1A
CJXH1A
ALKH1A
CLKH1A
ALLH1A
CLLH1A
X6EH10
H2
H2A
AKKH2A
BKKH2A
A1PH2A
B1PH2A
NPM
CODE
30
30
30
30
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
55
55
55
55
AUTH
CODE(S)
99
99
99
99
SQ
SQ
SQ
SQ
SQ
SQ
SQ
SQ
99
99
99
DD
DD
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
RAD CRIT.STDS4GDLNS
RAD PRGM IMPLEMENTA
RAD PROG IMPLMNTION
RAD ENVRM IMPCT AST
RAD ENV IMPACT ASM
RAD ENV IMPACT ASM
INTERDISCIPLINARY
RES t DEV - INTER
INTERMEDIA PROGRAMS
H109 I EXP RES CO PRG INTE
H109 I EXP .RES CO PRG INTE
H109 B TECHN INFORM LIAIS
H109 B TECHN INFORM LIAIS
H109 C QUALITY ASSUR MGMT
HI 09 C QUALITY ASSUR MGMT
H109 A SCIENT ASSESS INTER
H109 A SCIENT ASSESS INTER
F104 C INTERDISC REIMB/ORD
ABMT S CNTL - INTER
FED AGEN NEPA COMP
NEPA COMPLIANCE
NEPA COMPLIANCE
FED AGENCIES COMPL
FED AGENCIES COMPL
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Radiation Criteria, Standards ft Guidelines
Radiation Program Implementation
Radiation Program Implementation
Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
Interdisciplinary
Research and Development - Interdisciplinary
Intermedia Programs
Exploratory Research-Core Program - Interdisciplinary
Exploratory Research-Core Program - Interdisciplinary
Technical Information ft Liaison
Technical Information ft Liaison
Quality Assurance Management
Quality Assurance Management
Scientific Assessment Interdisciplinary
Scientific Assessment Interdisciplinary
Interdi sc i pi i nary Rei mbursable/ORD
Abatement and Control - Interdisciplinary
NEPA Compliance and Federal Agencies Compliance
NEPA Compliance
NEPA Compliance
Federal Agencies Compliance
Federal Agencies Compliance
H2C
INTERDISC TRAIN CRTS Interdisciplinary Training Grants
INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM NPM
CODE CODE
B8UH2C 10
H2H
A6ZH2H SO
X6FH20 50
H3
H3A
AFNH3A 80
BFNH3A 80
AJAH3A 80
BJAH3A 80
H6
H61
E5FH61 60
K10
X6JK10 10
K5
K50
X6LK50 50
X6QK50 50
K6
K69
AUTH DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODECS) CODES SHORT TITLE
99 H240 I INTERDISC TRAIN CRT
INTDSCPLNRY TECH AST
99 EPA DISASTER AST
99 DISASTER ASSISTANCE
ENFORCEMENT-INTER
ENF POL-TECH SUP
99 • TECH SUPP-OECM
99 TECH SUPP-OECM
99 ENF POLICY ft OPRNS
99 ENF POLICY ft OPRNS
SAO -INTERDISC
INDIA
99 SAO-INDIA-INTERDISC
GENERAL
R&D UNISSUED REIMBU
99 F104 C ORD UNISSUED REIMB
AGCY MGMT UNISSUED REIM
AGCY MGMT UNISSUED RE
99 AGENCY MGT. UNISSUE
99 AGENCY MGT. REIMBMT
SAO - UNDISTRIBUTED
UNDISTRIBUTED
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Interdisciplinary Training Grants
Interdisciplinary Technical Assistance
EPA Disaster Assistance
Disaster Assistance
Enforcement-Interdisciplinary
Enforcement Policy ft Technical Support
Technical Support-Office of Enforcement And Compliance Monitoring
Technical Support-Office of Enforcement And Compliance Monitoring
Enforcement Policy ft Operations
Enforcement Policy ft Operations
SAO -Interdisciplinary
India
SAO-Indi a-Interdi sci pi i nary
General
Research ft Development Unissued Reimbursables
Research ft Development Unissued Reimbursables
ORD Unissued Reimbursables
Agency Management Unissued Reimbursables
Agency Management Unissued Reimbursables
Agency Management Unissued Reimbursables
Agency Management Reimbursements
SAO - Undistributed
Undistributed
E4LK69 60 99
SAO UNDISTRIBUTED
SAO Undistributed
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
RLPK9C
L
LI
L1A
ACML1A
CCML1A
ACPL1A
CCPL1A
ACRL1A
CCRL1A
ACSL1A
CCSL1A
ACTL1A
CCTL1A
ACUL1A
CCUL1A
L2
L2C
JMSL2C
JMXL2C
JMYL2C
L2S
AHZL2S
BHZL2S
AJNL2S
BJNL2S
NPM
CODE
75
.
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
AUTH DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODE(S) CODES SHORT TITLE
70
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
FA
FA
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
HAZ SUB RESP-IAG RE
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
RSRCH S DEV - TOXIC
CHEM TEST t. ASSESSM
LI 04 T STRAT MOD CTSA TOX
L104 T STRAT MOD CTSA TOX
LI 04 A SCI ASSMT CTSA TOX
LI 04 A SCI ASSMT CTSA TOX
LI 04 C MON SYSQA CTSA - TS
LI 04 C MON SYSQA CTSA - TS
L104 D HLTH EFF - CTSA TOX
L104 D HLTH EFF - CTSA TOX
LI 04 E ENV ENSTEC CTSA TOX
LI 04 E ENV ENSTEC CTSA TOX
L104 F ENV PROSEFF CTSA TS
L104 F ENV PROSEFF CTSA TS
ABMT S CNTL - TOXIC
TOXIC SUB - FIN AST
"ASBESTOS/SCHOOL ALG
"ASBESTOS/SCHOOL PA
"ASBESTOS/SCHOOL CC
TOXIC SUB STATEGIES
TOXICS INTEGRATION
TOXICS INTEGRATION
CHEMICAL TESTING
CHEMICAL TESTING
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Interagency Reimbursables - Hazardous Substance Response
Toxic Substances
Research and Development - Toxic Substances
Chemical Testing ft Assessment
Stratospheric Modification - Chemicals Testing ft Assessment - Toxic
Stratospheric Modification - Chemicals Testing S Assessment - Toxic
Subs
Subs
Scientific Assessment - Chemicals Testing ft Assessment - Toxic Substance
Scientific Assessment - Chemicals Testing ft Assessment - Toxic Substance
Monitoring Systems S Quality Assurance - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-
Monitoring Systems ft Quality Assurance - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-
Health Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment Toxic Substances
Health Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment Toxic Substances
Environmental Engineering ft Technology - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-T
Environmental Engineering S Technology - Chemical Testing ft Assessment-T
Environmental Processes ft Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment
Environmental Processes S Effects - Chemical Testing and Assessment
Abatement and Control - Toxic Substances
Toxic Substances - Financial Assistance
Asbestos In School - Abatement Loan And Grants
Asbestos In School - Program Administration.
Asbestos In School - Certification of Contracts
Toxic Substances Strategies
Toxics Integration
Toxics Integration
Chemical Testing
Chemical Testing
- To
- To
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-19Q6
U
1
U)
CD
PROGRAM
CODE
AJPL2S
BJPL2S
AJQL3S
BJQL2S
L3
L3A
AFLL3A
BFLL3A
B8TL3A
L6
L61
E7ZL61
M
H4
M4A
D4KM4A
N
Nl
N1A
ACVN1A
CCVN1A
KCVN1A
ACYN1A
CCYN1A
ACZN1A
CCZN1A
NPM
CODE
70
70
70
•70
70
70
70
60
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
AUTH
CODECS)
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
99
99
SM
SW
SM
ST
ST
SS
SS
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
EXISTING CHEM REV
EXISTING CHEM REV
NEW CHEMICAL REVIEW
NEW CHEMICAL REVIEW
ENFORCEMENT - TOXIC
TOXIC SUB ENFORCEME
TOX SUB ENFRCMENT
TOX SUB ENFRCMENT
•TOXIC SUBST ENF GRT
SAO - TOXIC SUBSTAN
INDIA
SAO - TS - INDIA
NEW FACILITIES
NEW FACILITIES
NEW FACILITIES
NEW FACILITIES
ENERGY
RSRCH « DEV - ENERGY
MULTI-MEDIA ENERGY
N104 0 ACID RN MLTI-MED EN
N104 Q ACID RN MLTI-MED EN
N104 Q ACID RN MLTI-MED EN
N104 D HLTH EFF MUL-MED EN
N104 D HLTH EFF MUL-MED EN
N104 E EHV E*T MULT-MED EN
N104 E ENV EST MULT-MED EN
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Existing Chemical Review
Existing Chemical Review
New Chemical Review
New Chemical Review
Enforcement - Toxic Substances
Toxic Substances Enforcement
Toxic Substances Enforcement
Toxic Substances Enforcement
Toxic Substances Enforcement Grants
SAO - Toxic Substances
India
SAO - TS - India
New Facilities
New Facilities
New Facilities
New Facilities
Energy
Research and Development - Energy
Multi -Media Energy
Acid Rain - Multi -Media - Energy
Acid Rain - Multi -Media - Energy
Acid Rain - Multi-Media - Energy
Health Effects - Multi -Media-Energy
Health Effects - Multi -Media-Energy
Environmental Engineering ft Technology Multi -Media-Energy
Environmental Engineering & Technology Multi -Media-Energy
CDAN1A 10 SU
N104 f
ENV P8E MLTI MED EN Environmental Processes & Effects - Multi-Media Energy
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
NIB
M9AN1B
P
P4
P4A
D4JP4A
N4JP4A
R
R5
R5A
ADER5A
AGKR5A
AGLR5A
ALSR5A
1
w ALTR5A
VO
A2TR5A
A2UR5A
A2VR5A
R6
R6Z
E5KR6Z
R61
E5LR61
NPM
CODE
10
50
50
10
80
75
55
85
30
40
70
60
60
AUTH OU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODEC S) CODES SHORT TITLE
OXIDANTS ENERGY
ST N109 D ENERGY HLTH EFFECTS
REPAIRS ft IMPROVEMENTS
REPAIRS & IMPROVEMENTS
REPAIRS ft IMPROVEMENT
99 REPAIRS ft IMPROVEME
99 REPAIRS t IMPROVEME
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
RM R167 N PROGRAM MGT - ORD
99 PROGRAM MGT - OECM
99 PROGRAM MGT - OSWER
99 PROGRAM MGT - OEA
99 PROGRAM MGT - OGC
99 PROGRAM MGT - OAR
99 PROGRAM MGT - OH
99 PROGRAM MGT - OPTS
GENERAL SUPPORT
GENERAL SUPPORT
99 NSF TRANSFER FUNDS
INDIA
99 SAO-INDIA-OIA TRAVE
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Oxidants Energy
Health Effects '- Oxidants - Energy
Repairs ft Improvements
Repairs ft Improvements
Repairs ft Improvements
Repairs ft Improvements
Repairs ft Improvements
Program Management
Program Management
Program Management
Program Management - Research ft Development
Program Management - Enforcement And Compliance
PM-225
01-25-85
Moni tor ing
Program Management - Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Program Management - External Affairs
Program Management - General Counsel
Program Management - Air And Radiation
Program Management - Water
Program Management - Pesticides and Toxic Substances
General Support
General Support
NSF Transfer Funds
India
SAO-India-OIA Travel
INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
R68
E5RR68
S
SB
S5A
ADZS5A
AGRS5A
AGSS5A
AGTS5A
AGUS5A
AHBS5A
AHCS5A
1 AHDS5A
4S
AHES5A
AHFS5A
AHGS5A
AHYS5A
AJFS5A
AJSS5A
AJTS5A
ALVS5A
NPM
CODE
60
60
90
50
50
50
90
90
90
55
90
55
55
60
60
60
60
AUTH
CODECS )
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
PAKISTAN
SAO-PAKISTAN-OIA TR
AGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGENCY MANAGEMENT
OFF OF SMALL » DISA
PROGRAM MGT - OPPE
PROGRAM MGT - OARM
FINANCIAL MGT HQ
OFFICE OF THE COMPT
PROGRAM IMTEG PROJ
POLICY ANALYSIS
STANDARDS ft REGULAT
OFC/LEGISL ANALYSIS
MGMT SYS t EVALUATI
CONGRESSIONAL LIAIS
OFC OF PUBLIC AFFAI
REGU INFO SER CENTE
OFFICE OF MGMT SERV
EXECUTIVE SUPPORT
REGIONAL OPER-EXEC
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Pakistan
SAO-Pakistan-OIA Travel
Agency Management
Agency Management
Agency Management
Office of Small ft Disadvantaged Business Utilization
Program Management - Policy, Planning And Evaluation
Program Management - Administration
Financial Management-Headquarters
Office of the Comptroller
Integrated Environmental Management Program
Office of Policy Analysis
Office of Standards & Regulations
Office Of Legislative Analysis
Office of Management Systems t Evaluation
Office Of Congressional Affairs
Office of Public Affairs
Regulatory Information Service Center
Office of Management Services
Office Of Executive Support
Office of Regional Operations
« INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
APPENDIX . 6
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
AMKS5A
A2YS5A
A3AS5A
A3DS5A
A3ES5A
A3HS5A
A3JS5A
A3KS5A
A3MS5A
A3NS5A
A3QS5A
A3RS5A
A3VS5A
A3WS5A
A6RS5A
X6PS50
X6QS50
T
T5
T5A
NPM
CODE
50
85
65
60
60
60
60
55
60
60
50
50
50
50
55
50
50
AUTH
CODECS )
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
OFC HUMAN RES MGT
GENERAL COUNSEL
OFF OF INSPECTOR GE
IMMED OFC OF ADMIN
ADMINR'S REP FUND
INTERNTL ACTIVITIES
CIVIL RIGHTS
OFFICE OF FEDRL ACT
SCIENCE ADVISORY BO
ADMIN LAM JUDGES
PERS ft CRG SERVICES
CONTRACTS GRNTS MGM
FAC ft MGT SERVICES
INFO SYS ft SERVICES
OFC INTERGOV LIAISO
ADP STORET ACS/AGCY
AGENCY MGT. REIMBMT
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Office of Human Resources Management
Office Of General Counsel
Office of Inspector General
Immediate Office Of The Administrator
Administrator's Representation Fund
Office of International Activities
Office of Civil Rights
Office of Federal Activities
Science Advisory Board
Office of Administrative Law Judges
Personnel and Organization Services
Contracts and Grants Management
Facilities ft Management Services
Information Systems ft Services
Office of Intergovernmental Liaison
ADP Storet Access/All Agencies
Agency MGT Reimbursements
Regional Management
Regional Management
Regional Management
AKVT5A 50 99
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Resource Management - Regions
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A2XT5A
A3XT5A
A3YT5A
A3ZT5A
A4AT5A
A4BT5A
W
MS
W80
GDJW80
GHHM80
GHNM80
GHPM80
GHQW80
GHRWSO
GHSM80
GLAH80
GLBW80
GLCH80
GLDH80
GLEW80
NPM
CODE
85
60
90
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
AUTH
CODECS)
99
99
99
99
99
99
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
REGIONAL COUNSEL
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
ANALYSIS * EVALUATI
FIN MANAGEMENT-REG
PERSONNEL MGMT-REG
ADMIN MGMT-REGIONS
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
CON CRTS - MTR QUAL
CON CRTS - MUN MST
1981 CONSTR GRANTS
1982 CONSTR GRANTS
1982 RECOVER/1980
1982 RECOVER/1979
1982 RECOVER/1978
1982 RECOVER/1977.
1982 RECOVER/CA
1984 CG WSTE WTR TR
1984 STATE MGT AST
1984 CG INNOV TECH
1984 CG ALTERN TECH
1984 CG SMALL COMM
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Regional Counsel
Regional Management
Planning> Evaluation t Analysis - Regions
Financial Management - Regions
Personnel Management - Regions
Administrative Management - Regions
Construction Grants
Construction Grants-Mater Quality
Construction Grants-Municipal Waste Treatment Grants
1981 Construction Grants
1982 Construction Grants
1982 Recoveries/1980 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/1979 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/1978 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/1977 Appropriation
1982 Recoveries/Contract Authority
1984 Construction Grants Waste Water Treatment
1984 State Management Assistance
1984 Construction Grants Innovative Technology
1984 Construction Grants Alternative Technology
1984 Construction Grants Small Communities
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US EHVIROHMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND COOES
FT 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
6LFM80
GLGW80
GLHW80
GLWM80
GMAW80
GWBW80
GHCW30
GMDW80
GMEW80
GMFW80
GMGW80
O
i. GMHW80
UJ
GMJW80
GMWW80
G7AW80
G7BW80
G70W80
X
X5
X5A
NPM
CODE
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
AUTH
COOE(S)
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV
BV .
BV
BV
BV
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
COOES SHORT TITLE
1984 CG ADVANCE ALU
1984 CG WtJ HOT PLNG
1984 CG COMBINED SE
CG UNISSUED RECOVER
1985 CG WSTE UTR TR
1985 STATE MGT AST
1985 CG INNOV TECH
1985 CG ALTERN TECH
1985 CG SMALL COMM
1985 CG ADVANCE ALU
1985 CG MQ MGT PLNG
1985 CG MARINE BAY
1985 CG COMBINED SE
1985 CG UNISSUED RE
WASTE TRMT CG 67/72
WASTE TRMT CG REIMB
WASTE TRMT CG PWEA
SUPPORT COSTS
SUPPORT COSTS
SUPPORT COSTS
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
1984 Construction Grants Advance of Allowance
1984 Construction Grants Mater Quality Management Planning
1984 CG Combined Sewer Overflow
Construction Grants Unissued Recoveries
1985 Construction Grants Waste Water Treatment
1985 State Management Assistance
1985 Construction Grants Innovative Technology
1985 Construction Grants Alternative Technology
1985 Construction Grants Small Communities
1985 Construction Grants Advance of Allowance
1985 Construction Grants Water Quality Management Planning
1985 CG Combined Sewer Overflow
1985 Construction Grants Marine Bay & Estuary Special
Construction Grants Recoveries
Waste Treatment Construction Grants (1967-1972)
Waste Treatment Construction Grants (Reimbursable)
Waste Treatment Grants Public Works Employment Act
Support Costs
Support Costs
Support Costs - -
AHAX5A 70 99
LAB SUPPORT - OPTS Lab Support - Pesticides * Toxic Substances
* INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
APPENDIX 6
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01r25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
A3LX5A
A4CX5A
H4CX5A
J4CX5A
K4CX5A
A4DX5A
A4EX5A
A4FX5A
A4GX5A
A4HX5A
Y
Yl
Y1A
TEDY1A
TEGYIA
TEJY1A
TEKY1A
Y3
Y3A
SFZY3A
TFZY3A
SGBY3A
TGBY3A
SJBY3A
TJBY3A
NPM
CODE
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
10
30
50
10
10
10
10
60
60
75
75
60
80
AUTH
CODECS)
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
RW
99
99
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODES SHORT TITLE
PROFESSIONAL TRAINI
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
NATIONWIDE SUPP SER
HDQRS SUPPORT SERV
REG SUPPORT SERVIC
R550 X LAB SUPPORT - ORD
LAB SUPPORT - OAR
ADP SUPPORT COSTS
SUPERFUND
RES « DEV-SUPERFUND
HAZ SUB RESEARCH
Y105 A SCI ASMENT-SUPERF
Y105 C MON SYS8QLY AS SPFD
Y105 E ENV ENGSTECH SUPERF
Y105 F ENV PRO&EFF SUPERFU
ENFORCEMENT
HAZ SUB RES-ENFRCMT
TECH SUPP-OECM
TECH SUPP-OECM
HAZ SUB TECH ENFORC
HAZ SUB TECH ENFORC
HAZ SUB- LEGAL ENFOR
HAZ SUB-LEGAL ENFOR
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Professional Training
Nationwide Support Services
Nationwide Support Services
Nationwide Support Services
Nationwide Support Services
Headquarters Support Services
Regional Support Services
Lab Support-Research * Development
Lab Support - Air And Radiation
Automated Data Processing Support Costs
Superfund
Research and Development - Superfund
Hazardous Substances Research
.Scientific Assessment - Superfund
Monitoring Systems * Quality Assurance - Superfund
Environmental Engineering & Technology - Superfund
Environmental Processes * Effects - Superfund
Enforcement
Hazardous Substance Response-Enforcement
Hazardous Substance-Technical Support - Office of Enforcement And Compli
Hazardous Substance-Technical Support - Office of Enforcement And Compli
Hazardous Substance Technical Enforcement
Hazardous Substance Technical Enforcement
Hazardous Substance Legal Enforcement
Hazardous Substance Legal Enforcement
« INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-335
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
Y5
Y5A
TENY5A
SEPY5A
TEPY5A
SERY5A
TERY5A
SETY5A
TETY5A
SEUY5A
TEUY5A
TEVY5A
SEWY5A
TEWY5A
TEYY5A
SFCY5A
TFCY5A
TGVY5A
SGZY5A
TGZY5A
SKUY5A
TKUY5A
TLXY5A
Y9
Y9A
NPM
CODE
AUTH DU/SUBDU PROGRAM/BUDGET
CODECS) CODES SHORT TITLE
MGMT a SUP - SUPER
MGMT & SUPPORT
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
65
85
85
85
50
50
90
50
50
50
50
10
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
Y517 N HAZ
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
FIN MAT REG
ADMN MGT
ADMN MGT
SUP SERV
SUP SERV
ADMN MGT
ADMN MGT
SUP SERV
SUP SERV
HQ
HQ
HQ
HQ
RT
RT
RT
RT
INSPC GENRL
LEG SERV
LEG SERV
LEG SERV
HQ
HQ
RT
SUB-COMPTR SERV
SUB-COMPTR SERV
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
SUB
OPPE
FIN MGMT
FIN MGMT
OC
OC
ORD-LAB
HQ
HQ
SUP
HAZ SUB RESP ACTION
HAZ SUB RESP - EPA
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Management and Support -Super fund
Management and Support
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Hazardous
Substance Financial Management-Regions
Substance-Administrative Management - Headquarters
Substance-Administrative Management - Headquarters
Substance-Support Services - Headquarters
Substance-Support Services - Headquarters
Substance-Administrative Management - Regions
Substance-Administrative Management - Regions
Substance-Support Services - Regions
Substance-Support Services - Regions
Substance-Office of the Inspector General
Substance-Legal Services - Headquarters
Substance- Legal Services - Headquarters
Substance Legal Services - Regions
Substance-Computer Services
Substance-Computer Services
Substance-Office of Policy. Planning And Evaluation
Substance-Financial Management - Headquarters
Substance-Financial Management - Headquarters
Substance Office of the Comptroller
Substance Office of the Comptroller
Substance Office of Research. and Development - Lab Support
Substance Response Actions
Substance Response - Environmental Protection Agency
INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
BUDGET/PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND CODES
FY 1985-1986
PROGRAM
CODE
SFAY9A
TFAY9A
TLNY9A
TLZY9A
Y9C
SJGY9C
TJGY9C
TJHY9C
SJJY9C
TJJY9C
TJKY9C
SJMY9C
TJMY9C
1
£ TKLY9C
SKSY9C
SLMY9C
TLMY9C
RLPY9C
Y90
NPM
CODE
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
AUTH DU/SUBDU
CODECS) CODES
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70 70
70
70
70
PROGRAM/BUDGET
SHORT TITLE
HAZ SPILL ft SITE RE
HAZ SPILL ft SITE RE
MULTI-MEDIA SUPPORT
HAZ SUB RESP SUPPLM
HAZ SUB RESP-IAG
INTERAG. SUPER-HHS
INTERAG. SUPER-HHS
INTERAG. SUPER-USCG
INTERAG SUP-JUSTICE
INTERAG SUP- JUSTICE
INTERAG. SUP-FEMA
INTERAG. SUP-NOAA
INTERAG. SUP-NOAA
INTERAG. SUP-DOI
FEMA-RELOCATION
INTERAG. SUP-OSHA
INTERAG. SUP-OSHA
HAZ SUB RESP-IAG RE
HAZ WST SITE INVENT
PROGRAM/BUDGET
LONG TITLE
Hazardous Spill ft Site Response
Hazardous Spill ft Site Response
Multi -media Support
Hazardous Substance Response Supplemental '
Hazardous Substance Response - Interagency
Interagency Superfund-Department of Health ft Human Services
Interagency Superfund-Department of Health ft Human Services
Interagency Superf und-Uni ted States Coast Guard
Interagency Superfund-Department of Justice
Interagency Superfund-Department of Justice
Interagency Superfund Federal Emergency Management Agency
Interagency Superfund National Oceanographic ft Atmospheric Administratio
Interagency Superfund National Oceanographic ft Atmospheric Administratio
Interagency Superfund Department of Interior
Interagency Superf und-FEMA-Relocat ion
Interagency Superfund Occupational Safety ft Health Administration
Interagency Superfund Occupational Safety ft Health Administration
Interagency Reimbursables - Hazardous Substance Response
Hazardous Waste Site Inventory
« INDICATES GRANT PE
-------
APPENDIX 7
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
RPIO/ALLOWANCE HOLDER CODES Mm TITLES
FY 1984-1986
CODE TITLE
RPIO-11 ADMIN/STAFF
11 ADMIN/STAFF OFFICES
RPIO-16 AA ADMIN ft RES MST
16 AA ADMIN ft RESOURCE MGT
42 COMPTROLLER
51 DIR-ADMIHISTRATION
52 DIR-ADMIN/CINN
54 DIR-ADMIN/RTP
55 DIR-INFORM RSCES MGT
85 OIR-OFC OF HUMAN RESOURCES MGT
RPIO-41 AA POLCY, PLNG, EVAL
41 AA POLCY, PLNG, ft EVAL
43 DIR-POLICY ANALYSIS
44 DIR-STANDARDS ft REGS
45 DIR-MGT SYS ft EVAL
O
^ RPIO-77 AA ENF ft COMPL MONIT
-J 77 AA ENF ft COMPL MONITORING
50 DIR-NATL ENF INV CTR-DENVER
RPIO-39 GENERAL COUNSEL
39 DIR-GENERAL COUNSEL
RPIO-15 AA EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
15 AA EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
36 DIR-FEDERAL ACTIVITIES
RPIO-35 INSPECTOR GENERAL
35 DIR-INSPECTOR GENERAL
RPIO-75 AA SW ft EMERG RESP
-------
APPENDIX 7
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-35-85
RPIO/ALLOWANCE HOLDER CODES AND TITLES
FY 198*- 1936
CODE TITLE
75 AA SM ft EMERG RESPONSE
61 DIR-HASTE PROGS ENF
31 DIR-SOLID WASTE
72 DIR-EMERG * REMEO RESP
RPIO-26 AA RSPCH ft DVLPMT
26 AA RSRCH t DVLPMT
60 DIR-MONTRG SYS * QUAL ASSUR
61 DIR-HEALTH RESEARCH
62 DIR-ENV ENGINEER t TECH
63 DIR-ENV FROCS * EFF RSRCH
64 OIR-HEALTH ft ENV ASM
RPIO-20 AA PEST ft TOX SUBS
20 AA-PEST t TOX SUBS
32 DIR-PESTICIDES PROGS
O 69 DIR-TOXIC SUBSTANCES
I
71 ASSOC AA TOX INTEGRATION
00 83 DIR-PEST ft TS ENF
RPIO-27 AA AIR ft RADIATION
27 AA AIR ft RADIATION
33 DIR-RADIATION .PROGRAMS
53 DIR-AQ PLUG ft STDS
56 OIR-MOBL S AIR POL CNTL
RPIO-30 AA MATER
30 AA MATER
23 DIR-HATER ENFORCEMENT
28 DIR-REGULATNS ft STDS
29 DIR-WATER PROGR OPRNS
<*0 DIR-DRINKING MATER
86 DIR-GROUND MATER
87 DIR-MAR ft ESTUARINE MGT
-------
APPENDIX 7
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
RPIO/ALLOWANCE HOLDER CODES AND TITLES
FY 1984-1986
CODE TITLE
RPIO-RT REGIONS TOTAL
01 RA REGION 1 BOSTON
02 RA REGION 2 NEW YORK
03 RA REGION 3 PHILADEPHIA
04 RA REGION 4 ATLANTA
05 RA REGION 5 CHICAGO
06 RA REGION 6 DALLAS
07 RA REGION 7 KANSAS CITY
08 RA REGION 8 DENVER
09 RA REGION 9 SAN FRANCISCO
10 RA REGION 10 SEATTLE
RT REGIONS TOTAL
RPIO- RESERVES
91 UNALLOC ACTIONS
92 EPA HEADQUARTERS RESERVE
93 COMPTROLLER-TRHSF FUNDS
94 EPA REGIONAL RESERVE
95 APPROVED OVERRUN RESERVE
96 RESC/DEFER RESERVE
9R REGIONAL PCB RESERVE
9H HQTRS PCB RESERVE
98 ST CREDITS FOR SUPERFUND
Rl ADP SAL 8 EXP RESERVE
R2 ADP SUPERFUND RESERVE
RPIO-97 ST/LOCAL FIN. ASST
97 ST/LOCAL FIN. ASST
-------
APPENDIX 8
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPROPRIATION AUTHORIZATION COOES ft TITLES
FY 1985-1986
PM-225
01^25-85
AUTHORIZING
CODE SECTION
SECTIONS HAVING SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION CODES
A FED WTR POL CNTL ACT
AA 205(E) FOR 205(E)
AB 504(6X2) FOR 504
AC 77 FOR 77
FHPCA
O
Ln
O
B FED WTR POL CNTL ACT FWPCA
BA 104(U)(1) FOR 10* OTHR THAN (GH 1 ),(G)( 2) ,(P),(R ),(T)
BB 104(U)(2) FOR 104(G)(1)
BC 104(U)(3) FOR 104(G)(2)
BO 104(U)(4)
BE 104(U)(5)
BF 104(U)(6)
BG 105IH)
BH 106(A)
BI 213
BJ 107(E)
BK 108(C)
BL 108(E)
BM 112(C)
BN 113(0)
BP 114(0)
BQ 115
BR 206(E)
BS 206(E)
BT 207
BU 207
BV 207
BM 208(F)(3)
BX 208(H)(2)
BY 209(C)
BZ 30
-------
APPENDIX 8
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01-25-85
APPROPRIATION AUTHORIZATION CODES * TITLES
FY 1985-1986
AUTHORIZING
CODE SECTION SECTIONS HAVING SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION CODES
B2 315(6) FOR 315
B3 317(B) FOR 317
B4 517 FOR ACT EXCL 104,105,106(A>, ETC
B5 3(A) FOR 5(N) MINUS SALARIES & RELATED EXPENSES
B6 3(B) FOR 8 (GRANTS)
B7 8(A) FOR 4(C) DISASTER LOAN FUND
B8 10 FOR 10
B9 12(F) FOR 12(F)
C. MARINE PROT, RSRCH ft SANCT ACT MPRSA
CA 111 FOR TITLE I
CB 204 FOR TITLE II
CC 30* FOR TITLE III
D CLEAN AIR ACT, AS AMENDED CAA
DA 103(F)(3) FOR 103(F)(3)
DB 104(C) FOR 104
DC 212(1) FOR 212
DO 325 FOR GENERAL AUTHORIZATION
DE 103UH5) FOR 103(A)(5)
DF 127 FOR 127
DG 175 FOR 175
DH 323 FOR 323
DK PARTB TITLE I FOR PARTB TITLE I
E FIFRA FIFRA
EA 27 FOR PESTICIDES
F ASBESTOS SCHOOL HAZARDS ABATEMENT ACT OF 1984
FA SECTION. 512 FOR GENERAL AUTHORIZATION
G RESOIWCE CONSERV & RECOV ACT RCRA
-------
APPENDIX 8
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPROPRIATION AUTHORIZATION CODES ft TITLES
FT 1985-1986
PM-225
01-25-85
AUTHORIZING
CODE SECTION
SECTIONS HAVING SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION CODES
GA 2004(B) FOR 2004
GB 216CAH2) FOR SOLID HASTE OISP ACT EXCL. 208
GC 2007(B) FOR 2003
GO 2007(C) FOR
GE 2007,ALL OTHER FOR
6F 3011 FOR
GG 40081A HI) FOR
GH 4008(AH2)(C)
GK 4008(E>(2>
GM 4009(0)
GP 8002(J)(5>
GR 8002(M)
GS 8007
GT 3012
GH
SUBTITLE C
OTHER THAN 2003, 2004, SUBTITLE C
3011
SUBTITLE D
FOR 4008(2)
FOR 4008(E)
FOR 4009
FOR 80021J)
FOR 8002 EXCEPT (J)
FOR SUBTITLE H EXCEPT 6002
FOR 3012
FOR SUBTITLE I
O
Ln
H SAFE DRINKING HATER ACT OF 1974
HA 1442(E) FOR 1442
HB 1443(A)(7) FOR 1443(A)(1)
HC 1443(B)(5) FOR 1443(B)(1)
SDHA
HO 1444(0
HE 3(C)
HF 1442(E)
FOR 1444U) AND 1444(B)
FOR 3
FOR 1442(A)(2)(B)
K NOISE POLUTN ft ABATE ACT OF 1970
KA 403 FOR ACT
NPAA
L NOISE CONTROL ACT OF 1972
LA 15(G) FOR 15
LB 19 FOR ACT EXCLUDING 15
NCA
R ENVIR RSRCH, DEV, & DEMO ACT
ERDDA
-------
APPENDIX 8
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPROPRIATION AUTHORIZATION CODES & TITLES
FY 1985-1986
PH-225
01-25-85
AUTHORIZING
CODE SECTION
SECTIONS HAVING SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION CODES
RM 2(B)
R«D PROGRAM MGT ft SUPPORT
o
Ln
S ENVIR RSRCH, DEV, * DEMO ACT ERODA
SA RAD MONITORS RADIATION MONITORING
SB WSTE MTR REUSE WASTE MATER REUSE
SC SW M 4 T SUPP SOLID WASTE MONITORING & TECH SUPPORT
SD OXIDANTS NON-E OXIDANTS NON-ENERGY
SE H A P NON-E HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS NON-ENERGY
SF MOB S NON-E MOBILE SOURCES NON-ENERGY
SG GAS & PART N-E GASES AMD PARTICLES NON-ENERGY
SH WQ NON-E WATER QUALITY NON-ENERGY
SJ M WM/SP PR N-E MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER/SPILL PREVENTION NON-ENER
SK INDUS WVJ NON-E INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER NON-ENERGY
SL DRINK WTR N-E DRINKING UATER NON-ENERGY
SM HAZ WASTES HAZARDOUS WASTES
SN PEST NON-E PESTICIDES NON-ENERGY
SP RAD NON-E RADIATION NON-ENERGY
SO INTERM PRG N-E INTERMEDIA PROGRAMS NON-ENERGY
SR TCT4A NON-E
SS CONTROL TECH
ST HEALTH EFFS
SV MONITOR SYSMS
SU ECOL EFFS
SW ACID RAIN
TOXIC CHEMICAL TESTING ft
CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH EFFECTS
MONITORING SYSTEMS
ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS
ACID RAIN
ASSESSMENT NON-ENERGY
T TOXIC SUBSTANCES CNTL ACT
TA 28(0) FOR 28
TB 29 FOR ACT OTHER THAN 27 AND 28
TSCA
9 APPROPRIATION ACT
99 OTHER EPA FUNDS NOT AUTH IN SPEC SECTS
AA
-------
APPENDIX 8
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PH-Z25
01-25-85
APPROPRIATION AUTHORIZATION CODES ft TITLES
FY 1985-1986
AUTHORIZING
CODE SECTION SECTIONS HAVING SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION CODES
7 COMPREH ENVIR RESP ft LIAB ACT OF 1980 CERLA
70 COMPREH ENVIRON RESPONSE ft LIABILITY ACT OF 1980 SF
O
Ol
-------
APPENDIX 9
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-225
01^25-85
NATIONAL PROGRAM MANAGER CODES AND TITLES
FY 1985-1986
CODE TITLE
10 AA RESEARCH S DEVELOPMENT
30 AA AIR & RADIATION
40 AA MATER
50 AA ADMIN ft RESOURCES MGT
55 AA EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
60 ADMINISTRATOR/STAFF
65 INSPECTOR GENERAL
70 AA PESTICIDES ft TOXIC SUBSTANCES
75 AA SOLID WASTE & EMERG RESPONSE
80 AA ENF ft COMPLIANCE MONITORING
85 GENERAL COUNSEL
90 AA POLICY. PUNNING ft EVALUATION
Cf
-------
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PM-22S
01-25-85
RMIS OBJECT CUSS COOES AND TITLES
FY 1985-1986
NO.
21
22
23
26
27
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
63
64
60
3 61
1 62
K 70
71
72
73
TITLE
PFT
OCFTE
OPFT
PFTE
OPFTE
PERS COMP ft BEN
TRAVEL PERSONAL
TRANSPORTATION
RENT COMM & UTIL
PRINT * REPROD
OTHER CONTR SERV
SUPPLIES ft MATLS
EQUIPMENT
LAND & STRUCTURE
INS CLAIMS-INDEM
ADP CONTRACTS
ADP TIMESHARE
R & 0 CONTRACTS
IA6 AGREEMENTS
PROG CONTRACTS
RESEARCH GRANTS
DEMO GRANTS
GRANTS-STATE
GRANTS-OTHER
ABBREV.
PFT
OCPFT
OPFT
PFTE
OPFTE
PCB
TRAVEL
TRAHSP
RENT
PRINT
OCSERV
SUPPL
EQUIP
LAND
INSUR
ADPCTR
ADPTIM
RDGRT
IAG
PGCTR
RGRT
DGRT
PGGRT
OGRT
*INTRAM DOLLARS
•INTRAM DOLLARS
•INTRAM DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
"INTRAI1 DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
*INTRAM DOLLARS
*EXTRAM DOLLARS
«EXTRAM DOLLARS
"EXTRAM DOLLARS
*EXTRAH DOLLARS
*EXTRAM DOLLARS
•EXTRAM DOLLARS
"EXTRAM DOLLARS
-------
AIR
Research and Development
Oxidants
A9DA1A Scientific Assessment - Salaries and
Expenses
C9DA1A Scientific Assessment - Research and
Development
The major objective of this research is to
provide technical consultation to the Agency's
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAOPS). The Scientific Assessment Program
develops updated reports on oxidants which are
then used as the scientific basis for revising
the National Ambient Air Duality Standards.
A9FA1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
C9FA1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
-Research and Development
This program provides quality assurance support
for the Oxidants Program Requirements. This
includes: maintains a repository of standard
reference materials; providing reference
analyses, gas samples, permeation devices and
flow rates traceable to National Bureau of
Standards (NBS) standards; and conducting the
National Audit Program. Standard reference
ultraviolet spectorphotometers are being
distributed to the field as the are certified
by NBS. Quality assurance support is also
provided for State and local air monitoring
stations.
AQGAIA Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
C9GA1A Health Effects — Research and Development
The purpose of this research is to support th§
re-evaluation process for updating the
documents for oxidants. The health
program provides scientific Infermatien
to reduce the uncertainties in estimates of the
public health risks posed by photochemlggl
oxidants.
D-57
-------
A9HA1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
C9HA1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
K9HA1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development - Carryover
Efforts of this research program are focused
on providing information on critical technical
issues to support the development of regul-
ations being prepared by 6AQPS. Two types
of research are included: (1) evaluating
generic control systems applicable to
industrial processes and (2) characterizing
and predicting emissions from industrial
processes. More specifically, reasearch will
focus on optimizing VOC reduction technologies,
evaluating the efficiency of spray painting
systems., and evaluating methods for compliance
with SIP NSPS regulations.
ADWA1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
CDWA1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
This program focuses on developing and valid-
ating air quality model to support implement-
ation, maintenance and enforcement of NAAOS.
Research will focus on improving the chemical
mechanisms that quantitatively describe ozone
formation in ambient air and determine the
extent and economic impacts of ozone on the
yield of crop major species.
D-58
-------
Hazardous Air Pollutants
ACMA1B Stratopheric Modification Program
~ Salaries and Expenses
CCMA1B Stratopheric Modification Program
- Research and Development
This program assesses the health and environ-
mental consequences of stratospheric ozone
depletion and associated ultraviolet-B radi-
ation. This includes investigation of radi-
ation at wavelengths which can cause increased
biologic damage to health, agricultural
productivity, the aquatic food chain and
climate.
A9NA1B Scientific Assessment - Salaries and Expenses
C9NA1B Scientific Assessment - Research and Development
The Scientific Assessment program prepares
health and risk assessments to support regul-
ation of hazardous air pollutants.
A90A1B Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
C9QA1B Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
Research is conducted to provide analytical
methods and quality assurance. ORD will
continue to provide information useful in
selection chemicals for regulation and to
investigate the effectiveness of existing
control measures. This program also supports
the integrated cancer study to determine the
relationship between air pollution and cancer.
D-59
-------
A9RA1B Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
C9RA1B Health Effects - Research and Development
Efforts of this research are directed toward
the identification and screening of hazardous
air pollutants. For this purpose, rapid and
efficient microbiological assay techniques are
developed, validated as predictions of signifi-
cant efforts, and applied to a broad range of
potential airborne toxins. Once a pollutant
has been identified as toxic, more detailed
research, especially in the development of
dose-response relationships, is developed
before a decision to regulate or not regulate
under NESHAP's can be made. Research also
contributes to the integrated cancer project.
A9SA1B Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
C9SA1B Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
This research program focuses on characteriz-
ing emissions and evaluating mitigation tech-
nologies for HAPS to assist OAOPS in formul-
ating regulatory strategies and in developing
priorities reducing HAP emissions.
A9TA1B Environmental Processes and Effects
- Salaries and Expenses
C9TA1B Environmental Processes and Effects
- Research and Development
Research on atmospheric transport, transform-
ation and fate of hazardous air pollutants
will continue to be conducted to support the
regulatory needs of OAOPS. Specific research
includes smog chamber studies, VOCs and ambient
air quality studies, and atmospheric photo-
chemistry simulations.
D-60
-------
Mobile Sources
A9UA1C Scientific Assessment - Salaries and
Expenses
C9UA1C Scientific Assessment - Research and
Development
The primary focus of this program is assess
health risks and exposure to carbon monoxide
to support review and revision of NAAOS and
motor vehicle emission standards.
A9WA1C Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
C9WA1C Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
The major objective of this research program
is to study actual human exposure to carbon
monoxide (CO). To support the NAAOS for CO,
analyses and reports based on human exposure
will be collected on completed field studies.
Data will be evaluated for its applicability
to other criteria air pollutants for which
NAAOS must be reviewed and revised.
A9XA1C Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
C9XA1C Health Effects - Research and Development
Efforts of this research program are to provide
the latest health effects information needed
to evaluate the ambient air quality and motor
vehicle emission standards for carbon monoxide.
Research on this subject provides information
needed for revision of the carbon monoxide
criteria document and the revision of the
carbon monoxide standard.
D-61
-------
A9YA1C Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
C9YA1C Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
The environmental processes research program
concentrates on characterizing emissions from
in-use vehicles. The in-use characterization
program provides realistic emission data used
to predict air quality impacts and support the
Agency's mobile source regulatory development
programs.
Gases and Particles
AADA1D Scientific Assessment - Salaries and Expenses
CADA1D Scientific Assessment - Research and Development
This program is directed at actually producing
the updates of the criteria documents for sulfur
oxide, particulate matter, and lead, which are
necessary for the mandatory review of the
standards for these pollutants.
AAFA1D Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
CAFA1D Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
ORD will analyze the mass and chemical com-
position of gases and particles from filters
collected by the Inhalable Particulate (IP)
Network OA support will be provided to various
air monitoring efforts such as IP and SCAM/NAMS
networks.
D-62
-------
AAGA1D Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CAGA1D Health Effects - Research and Development
The research program has three components:
provide the data on a full range of health
effects of exposure to gases, S02, particles,
lead from human and animal studies; provide
better data to extrapolate animal data to
humans; and provide improved test methods to
Agency efforts to determine .human effects.
AAHA1D Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CAHA1D Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
This program researches and assesses emissions
reduction technologies to support permitting,
NSPS and compliance activities.
APTA1D Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
COTA1D Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
This program focuses on research designed to
develop and validate air quality models to
support implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of NAAOS as well as provide the
health and welfare information needed to
revise and review NAAQS.
D-63.
-------
Abatement Control and Compliance
Emission Standards and Technology Assessments
A11A2A Emission Standards and Technology Assessments
- Salaries and Expenses
B11A2A Emission Standards and Technology Assessments
- Abatement Control and Compliance
The major objectives of this program element
are 1) the setting of new source performance
standards (NSPS), their periodic review and
revision, 2) the setting and revising of
national emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants (NESHAP) and 3) establishing air
emission standards under the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for area
sources at hazardous waste treatment, storage,
and disposal facilities. Section 111 of the
Clean Air Act mandates the Environmental
Protection Agency to establish NSPS and,
Section 112 authorizes the development of
NESHAPS.
New Source Performance Standards reflect the
performance of the best demonstrated systems
of emission reduction, considering cost and
energy impact for specific processes or
facilities in a source category. The
analysis supporting the NSPS considers tech-
nical feasibility; cost; and economic, energy
and environmental impacts. The background
information published as part of the NSPS
setting process provides useful data to State
agencies in defining best available control
technology, lowest achievable emission rates,
and reasonably available control technology,
when such determinations must be made under
other sections of the Clean Air Act.
D-64
-------
Pollutant Strategies and Air Standard Development
A12A2A Pollutant Strategies and Air Standards
Development - Salaries and Expenses
B12A2A Pollutant Strategies and Air Standards
Development - Abatement, Control and
Compliance
J12A2A Pollutant Strategies and Air Standards
Development - Abatement, Control and
Compliance Carryover
The major activities of this program element
are: (1) review and revision as appropriate of
all existing National Ambient Air Quality
Standards as mandated by the Clean Air Act, (2)
identification and assessment of the potential
hazardous air pollutants, including the deter-
mination as to the appropriateness of their
listing under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act,
and (3) development, review and analysis of
major national policies, strategies, rules
and programs necessary for national program
management.
State Program Policy Guidelines and Regulations
Development
A13A2A State Program Policy Guidelines and
Regulations Development - Salaries
and Expenses
B13A2A State Program Policy Guidelines and
J13A2A
Regulations Development - Abatement
Control and Compliance
State Program Policy Guidelines and
Regulations Development - Abatement
Control and Compliance Carryover
The objectives of this program element are the
development of guidelines and regulations that
set forth requirements for air pollution control
program implemented by the States under the Clean
Air Act (principally State Implementation Plans);
and maintaining an overview of the development
and implementation of air pollution control
D-65
-------
10
programs to assure national consistency at the
regional, State, and local levels. The State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) provide for the
attainment and maintenance of National Ambient
Air Duality Standards, and establish programs
for prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) of air quality in clean areas, and for
the protection of visibility in national parks
and wilderness areas.
A1RA2C Training - Salaries and Expenses
B18A2C Training - Abatement, Control and Compliance
This program provides training in specialized
areas of air pollution control. A small EPA
staff manages self-study training programs,
provides technical support to States and Regions
planning workshops and training courses,
assesses changing training requirements, and
updates existing courses as needed.
Mobile Source Air Pollution Control and Fuel Economy
AHTA2B Emission Standards, Technical Assessment
and Characterization - Salaries and Expenses
RHTA2B Emission Standards, Technical Assessment
and Characterization - Abatement Control and
Compliance
This program includes: 1) the establishment
of emission standards for mobile sources, and
associated technical analyses and emissions
characterization; 2) the development of tech-
nical procedures and guidelines applicable to
the control of emissions from in-use vehicles;
3) the measurement and assessment of in-use
motor vehicle emission levels; and 4) technical
analyses related to the development of inform-
ation on motor vehicle fuel economy.
D-66
-------
11
AHUA2B Testing, Technical and Administrative
Support - Salaries and Expenses
BHIJA2B Testing, Technical and Administrative
Support - Abatement Control and Compliance
The program provides in-house laboratory,
data processing, and other support for mobile
source air pollution control and fuel economy
activities as well as test procedure development
and refinement.
AHVA2B Emissions and Fuel Economy Compliance
- Salaries and Expenses
BHVA2B Emissions and Fuel Economy Compliance
- Abatement Control and Compliance
The program provides for the engineering
review of data to determine the compliance
of new motor vehicles with emission stan-
dards and other reproduction control re-
quirements, followup review of the validity
of manufacturers' data, and associated
technical activities. Similar procedures
for fuel economy determinations are also
included.
Air Quality Management Implementation
A20A2D Air Quality Management Implementation
- Salaries and Expenses
B20A2D Air Quality Management Implementation
- Abatement Control and Compliance
J20A2D Air Quality Management Implementation
This program provides for the operation and
maintenance of an air management program in
each of the Agency's ten Regional Offices. The
Regional air management program, in partnership
with State and local air pollution control
agencies, serves to meet the regulatory require-
ments specified in the Clean Air Act and EPA
implementing regulations.
D-67
-------
12
The air management program provides policy
guidance and technical consultation to States
in the development and implementation of the
strategies and regulatory programs for the
attainment and maintenance of National" Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAOS). It also con-
ducts the necessary review and coordination for
approval of State-submitted strategies. The
Agency negotiate air program grants and pro-
vides oversight of State and local progress in
developing and implementing regulatory programs
for standards attainment.
Trends Monitoring and Progress Assessment
A24A2F Air Quality and Emissions Data Management
and Analysis - Salaries and Expenses
B24A2F Air Quality and Emissions Data Management
and Analysis - Abatement and Control and
Compliance
This program element provides scientific and
technical guidance and support to other
EPA Headquarters Offices, Regional Offices,
and State and local agencies, in the following
program areas: air quality monitoring, air
quality modeling, emission factors, emission
inventories, and control strategy demonstrations.
The program element also manages the acquisition,
stroage and retrieval of nationwide air
quality and emission data; conducts analyses
of status and trends in air quality and emissions
for progress assessment, policy development
and evaluations, and public information; and
conducts specialized statistical and analytical
studies in support of air program policy,
standards, and regulation development.
D-68
-------
13
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
A23A2F Amb^-int Air flu 3.1 t :i y ^on i t r : '. ;• ~ -•
and Expenses
B23A2F Ambient Air Qualtiy Monitoring - Abatement.
Control and Compliance
J23A2F Ambient Air Oualtiy Monitoring - Abatement
Control and Compliance Carryover
Activity in this program includes: 1) EPA's
management overview of state ambient: air
quality monitoring networks, associated labor-
atory and field quality assurance activities
and the implementation of air monitoring
strategies as delineated in the air monitoring
regulations; 2) the coordination of regional
and State field investigation activities
for collection ambient air quality samples for
subsequent sample analysis and related quality
control; 3) reviewing of source emissions data,
and 4) the necessary management and coordination
to ens'.ire timely storage and validation of
data obtained.
Financial Support to State and Local Agencies
(105 Hrants)
B17A2C Control Agency Resource Supplementation
- Abatement Control and Compliance
J17A2C Control Agency Resource Supplementation
- Abatement Control and Compliance Carryover
This program element provides financial assis-
tance for state and local government to deve-
lop and implement programs to attain and main-
tain the national ambient air quality standards.
It includes support for development and regul-
atory programs, compliance and enforcement act-
ivities and air monitoring operations. EPA
grant assistance partially funds the costs for
the operation and continued efforts of these
Sl'i''"' an.I '.»( ,-i i ;i}U:ncy proij .rams in meeting
these responsibilities.
Air Reimbursables
X5TA20 Air Reimbursables - Reimbursement
D-69
-------
14
Enforcement
Stationary Source Enforcement
AFHA3A Stationary Source Enforcement - Salaries
and Expenses
RFHA3A Stationary Source Enforcement - Abatement
Control and Compliance
JFHA3A Stationary Source Enforcement - Abatement
Control and Compliance
This program element includes enforcement act-
ivities related to State Implementation Plans
(including Transportation Control Plans) where
States or local jurisdictions fail to act,
stationary sources whether or not directly
related to a SIP, New Source Performance
f?t.?nd.-mis (NSPS), and National Emission Stan-
dards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).
Activities include, but are not limited to:
(1) conduct of compliance - oriented surveil-
lance and inspection activities and field in-
vestigations; (2) participation in hearings;
(3) issuance of notices of violation or com-
pliance orders; (4) support related to civil
and criminal actions against alleged violators;
(5) review of reconstruction plans for sources
suMect to NSPS and NESHAPS: (6) review of
waiver requests for hazardous emission
standards; (7) work directly related to dele-
gation of enforcement authority for NSPS and
NFSHAPS to the States or review of such author-
ities already delegated; (8) provision of other
enforcement support, assistance, or incentives
to State or local jurisdictions in order to
assist any such jurisdiction in an enforcement
role which would otherwise be assumed by the
Federal government, or where such support is
required by statute or regulation; and (9) moni-
toring for Federal Facility Compliance.
D-70
-------
15
Mobile Source Enforcement
AFMA3B Mobile Source Enforcement - Salaries
and Expenses
BFMA3E Mobile Source Enforcement - Abatement
Control and Compliance"
The mobile source enforcement program is
directed primarily towards achieving comp-
liance with motor vehicle emission standards
and fuel regulations as required by the Clean
Air Act. The major goals and objectives are
to (1) assure that new vehicles meet emission
standards; (2) assure that vehicles meet emis-
sion standards in use; (3) assure that emis-
sion control systems are not removed or ren-
dered inoperative; (4) assure that harmful
additives are not present in gasoline; (5)
administer fuel and emission waivers; and (6)
administer the statutory emission warranties.
Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CRGB1C Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
The Environmental Engineering and Technology
program provides for: (1) evaluation of control
technologies; (2) definition of the efficiency,
reliabilitv and costs of various treatment tech-
nologies and support of State permitting activ-
ities and enforcement efforts.
D-71
-------
16
APHP1C Environmental Processes and Effects
- Salaries and Expenses
This research is used to evaluate the effec-
tiveness of various treatment processes in
terras of the ability to reduce toxicity in
industrial wastewater.
In addition research is conducted to deter-
mine which toxic pollutants warrant closer
attention and to evaluate the reliability
and usefulness of bioassay techniques for
toxicity determinations. The toxicity
characterizations need to be sufficient and
accurate to provide input to mathematical
models that predict fate and transport of
toxic pollutants for use in risk assessments.
D-72
-------
17
Water Duality
Research and Development
Water Quality Non-Energy
AAMR1A Scientific Assessment - Salaries and Expenses
CAMB1A Scientific Assessment - Research and Development
Research efforts in this program include providing
assistance in the evaluation of potential local
health hazards caused by exposure to chemical
pollutants; developing methods to evaluate
effects of exposures to complex mixtures; and
providing input to Clean Water Act permitting
modification.
AAPB1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
CAPB1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
— Research and Development
The program provides water quality monitoring
procedures and advice to Federal, State, and
local officials. The program also provides
quality assurance methods calibration materials,
and audits the performance of analytical labora-
tories to ensure the accuracy and reliability
of the data. The Agency's monitoring strategy
is designed to assess the Nation's water quality,
to enable State and Agency program managers to
better understand the cause and effect relation-
ships of environmental problems, and to evaluate
the effectiveness of control measures. The pro-
gram contributes to the achievement of Clean
Water mandates such as Sections 101(a)(1,3,5)
301(b)(1)(A), by focusing upon the provision of
uniformity in making measures. This is achieved
through Incorporating the standardized methods
into guidelines and manuals utilized by States
and industry. Performance is assisted through
the provision of calibrants and semiannual audits.
D-73
-------
18
AAOB1A Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CAOB1A Health Effects - Research and Development
The overall goal of the water quality health
research program is to provide the health
science information, techniques, and support
functions needed by the EPA Office of Water
Regulations and Standards (OWRS), and by
State and local pollution control agencies to
achieve the Agency goal of addressing ambient
water quality problems on a local or regional
basis from a cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit
perspective. Particular focus will be in the
human health problems caused by complex
effluents.
AARR1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
CAV.BJA Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
The major activities of this program element
are development of the scientific base needed
by EPA and the States in selecting reasonable
ecological goals in fresh and marine waters
and translating those goals into equitable
source control requirements. This scientific
base consists primarily of protocols and
guides for: (1) identifying highest water
uses potentially attainable at a given
site; (2) deriving realistic site-specific
water quality criteria; (3) an environmentally
sound ocean disposal program; and an expanded
effort in integrating pollutant specific
toxicity testing procedures for complex effluents
for water quality permitting.
D-74
-------
19
AATB1A Great Lakes Study - Salaries and Expenses
CATB1A Great Lakes Study - Research and Development
This program provides the scientific base
needed in resolving water quality problems in
the Great Lakes as required to meet United
States commitments in the United States-Canada
Water Quality Agreement. Major areas concern
the presence of persistent toxic pollutants
in the water, bottom sediments, fish, and the
evaluation of current methodologies for
development of site-specific water quality
criteria and assessments through the use of
biomonitoring techniques.
AJWB1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
The major objective of this program is to
obtain information on the appropriate level
of waste treatment for specific marine environ-
ments. Waste characterization of sewage
sludge will continue to focus on determining
whether contaminants continue to circulate in
sea water or are attached to particulates
which settle into the sediment.
Municipal Wastewater
AAVB1B Scientific Assessments - Salaries and Expenses
CAVB1B Scientific Assessments - Research and Development
The program focuses on developing a methodology for
conducting health hazard and risk assessment evalua-
tions of sludge disposal options. Efforts are now
focused on finalizing risk assessment guidelines for
determining criteria for contaminate levels is sludge.
D-75
-------
20
AAYB1B Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CAYR1B Health Effects - Research and Development
This research determines the health implica-
tions of existing and innovative technology for
the treatment and disposal of wastewater and
sludge.
Research will focus on pathogens, organic chemicals,
nitrates and sodium in wastewater land treatment
and the mutagenic carcinogenic toxic effects of
sludge disposal methods. Data is necessary for
the development of sludge guidelines and regulations.
AAZB1B Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CAZB1B Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
The environmental engineering and technology
municipal wastewater research focuses on the
following areas: (1) innovative and alternative
technology, (2) sludge management, (3) Compliance
achievement and upgrading of treatment facilities,
and (4) toxics treatment and control.
Industrial Wastewater Non-Energy
ABER1C Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
CBER1C Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
KBEB1C Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development Carryover
This research program contributes to the Agency's
programs on the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) and implementation
of a water quality monitoring strategy. The
research program focuses specifically on develop-
ing and providing tested and validated alternate
sampling requirements and test procedures for
analyzing pollutants in wastewater and for
D-76
-------
21
assuring data quality through the development
and application of quality assurance tools and
techniques, auditing the performance of analytical
laboratories and conducting performance evalu-
ations of individual analysts.
ABGB1C Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CBGB1C Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
The Environmental Engineering and Technology
program provides: (1) evaluations of processing
control technologies; (2) and a update to the
Treatability Manual for use by *permitters in
cost-vs-oerforraance data of control methods.
ABHB1C Environmental Processes and Effects
- Salaries and Expenses
This research is conducted to determine which
toxic pollutants warrant closer attention and
to evaluate the reliability and usefulness of
bioassay techniques for toxicity determinations.
The toxicity characterizations need to be suffici-
ent and accurate to provide input to mathematical
models that predict fate and transport of toxic
pollutants for use in risk assessments.
This program element includes resources for
establishing economically achievable effluent
limits for industries discharging directly to
waterways and indirectly through Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTWs).
Establishing and revising effluent limits
requires examination of industrial processes,
water usage, wastewater characteristics, and
treatment technologies in use or potentially
applicable. The requirement for economic achiev-
ability has led to extensive studies of the
financial and economic achievability of regulatory
options. These options are examined separately
to determine the possibility of closures and
for impact on production levels, employment,
industry size and concentration, foreign trade,
regional economics, and the economics of related
D-77
-------
22
industries. Additional resources are devoted
to technical support of EPA permitting authorities
and to support litigation in defense of established
effluent limitations.
Effluent Standards and Guidelines
A46B2B Effluent Standards and Guidelines
- Salaries and Expenses
B46B2B Effluent Standards and Guidelines
- Abatement, Control and Compliance
J46P2B Effluent Standards and Guidelines
- Abatement, Control and Compliance - Carryover
This program element includes resources for
establishing economically achievable effluent
limits for industries discharging directly
to waterways and indirectly through Publicly
Owned Treatments Works (POTWs).
Establishing and revising effluent limits
requires examination of industrial processes,
water usage, wastewater characteristics, and
treatment technologies in use or potentially
applicable. The requirement for economic
achievahility has led to extensive studies of
the financial and economic achievability of
regulatory options. These options are examined
separately to determine the possibility of
closures and for impact on production levels,
employment, industry size and concentration,
foreign trade, regional economics, and the
economics of related industries. Additional
resources are devoted to technical support of
EPA permitting authorities and to support
litigation in defense of established effluent
limitations.
D-78
-------
23
Dredge and Fill
AGMB2D Dredge and Fill - Salaries and Expenses
BGMB2D Dredge and Fill - Abatement Control
and Compliance
The Headquarters component of this program
provides National management, policy development,
and coordination with other Federal agencies to
effectively regulate the discharge of dredged
or fill material (under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act) into our Nations waters.
Regional activities include review of Section
404 permits for their conformity with the 404(b)
(1) guidelines, coordinating 404-related activit-
ies with State and local agencies, and review
of other agencies' environmental impact statements
with dredge or fill implications.
Water Quality Management and Regulations
A7XB2D Standards and Regulations - Salaries and
Expenses
B7XB2D Standards and Regulation - Abatement Control
and Compliance
This program includes resources for development
and publication of water quality standards
regulations, and related guidance and development
of water quality criteria. Studies are conducted
to determine the kind and extent of all identifiable
effects of toxic pollutants on human health
and aquatic life. Protocols are developed to
provide scientific and technical guidance to
States on methods for developing criteria which
reflect site-specific conditions. EPA provides
assistance to the States in applying these
protocols. Resources are also provided to
assist in the development and review of State
water quality standards to ensure that attainable
uses and appropriate criteria are established,
based on national policies and guidelines.
D-79
-------
AHXB2A Water Quality Management - Salaries and Expenses
BHXB2A Water Quality Management - Abatement,
Control and Compliance
JHXB2A Water Quality Management - Abatement,
Control and Compliance
This program element includes activities and outputs
related to oversight of and assistance to water
quality management programs and administration
of Federal financial assistance programs for water
quality planning and management. Included are
activities related to guidance and coordination
of Federal and State abatement, control, and
compliance programs and management of Clean Water
Act grants to State and interstate agencies under
Section 106; to designated planning agencies under
Section 208 (terminated in 1981); and to States
for non-construction grants management-related
activities under Section 205(g) and for water
quality management planning under Section 205(j).
This program element also supports regional Water
Division Directors and their immediate office staff.
Environmental Emergency Response
A51B2D Environmental Emergency Response and Prevention
- Salaries and Expenses
B51R2D Environmental Emergency Response - Abatement
Control and Compliance
J51B2D Environmental Emergency Response - Abatement
Control and Compliance Carryover
This program provides resources for the prevention
control of spills of oils and related substances
into navigable waters, as mandated by Sec 311
of the Clean Water Act. EPA shares responsibility
for this program with the United States Coast
Guard, which addresses those incidents in coastal
areas and the Great Lakes.
D-80
-------
25
In support of these objectives, the Agency operates
and maintains a 24-hour capability to receive and
respond to notifications of accidental spills or
threat of releases. Federal removal is directed
at major incidents where the responsible party
is unidentifiable, refuses to clean up, or is
incapable of providing timely, adequate removal
and where the States and local authorities lack
the necessary expertise, equipment or funding.
Removal by responsible parties and State and
local governments is monitored by EPA to ensure
that cleanup is adequate. This program also
provides resources for conducting inspections
of Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
(SPCC) plans at facilities which store or handle
oil and related substances. The inspections are
designed to ensure an adequate level of spill
prevention and responsible party response capability.
X5VB20 Oil/Hazardous Substances Revolving Fund
- Coast Guard - Reimbursements
This program element provides resources for shared
responsibilities between EPA and the U.S. Coast
Guard under the Environmental Emergency Response
and Prevention Program.
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
A53B2F Ambient Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
- Salaries and Expenses
B53B2F Ambient Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
- Abatement Control and Compliance
This program provides resources to develop water
quality monitoring and water quality based control
strategies, and procedures used to identify and
predict the biological and chemical measures of
controls and instream environmental quality.
These measures are necessary for assessing local
water quality and determining cost-effective controls
required to meet local water quality objectives.
Resources enable EPA to identify water quality
D-81
-------
26
problems, their causes and relative severity,
develop controls through wasteload allocations/
total maximum daily loads, and support technical
studies relating to other water quality manage-
ment programs including use attainability analyses.
This program includes resources to support
improved data management by the States.
Regional Environmental Services Directors and
immediate staff are also supported by this
program element.
Construction Grants Program Management
A54B2G Municipal Waste Treatment Facilities Construction
- Salaries and Expenses
B5AB2G Municipal Waste Treatment Facilities Construction
- Abatement Control and Compliance
This program element includes activities and
outputs related to management of the construction
grants program. Included are activities related
to oversight and assistance to delegated State
construction grants management programs under
Section 205(g) of the Clean Water Act; oversight
of the Interagency Agreement with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers; management of non-dele-
gated facilities construction project activities
through grant closeout; issuance of policy
guidance and assistance to improve municipal
waste treatment facilities performance and
financial management; and direct and indirect
training to meet treatment facility and State
water pollution control needs.
A56B2G Municipal Waste Treatment Operations and Main-
tenance
This program supports the larger construction
grants program by ensuring that Federally
funded wastewater treatment plants meet technical
design and operational performance requirements.
In addition, support for compliance activities
carried out primarily in the water quality enforce-
ment is provided.
D-82
-------
27
Specific activities include (1) providing policies,
guidance, and assistance to Regions and States
needed to implement facility operations and
maintenance procedure, (2) review of facility
performance during the first year of operation,
(3) review of compliance plan for facilities
not in compliance often the first year of oper-
ation and; (4) review in conjunction with water
enforcement staff, of compliance plans for
other non-complying facilities previously funded
with Federal grants.
Water Quality Management
AHXB2A Water Quality Management
- Salaries and Expenses
BHXB2A Water Quality Management
- Abatement, Control and Compliance
This program element includes activities
and outputs related to oversight of and assist-
ance to water quality management programs and
administration of Federal financial assistance
programs for water quality planning and manage-
ment. Included are activities related to guidance
and coordination of Federal and State abatement
control, and compliance programs and management
of Clean Water Act grants to State and interstate
agencies under Section 106; to designate planning
agencies under Section 208 (terminated in 1981);
and to States for non-construction grants
management-related activities under Section
205(g) and for water quality management
planning under Section 205(j).
B8GB2C - Training Grants (Section 104)
- Abatement, Control and Compliance
The purpose of this training program is to
develop an environmental workforce through
financial assistance to various universities.
This assistance supports individual graduate
level students in environmental programs.
D-83
-------
28
Great Lakes Program
A42B2A Great Lakes Program - Salaries and Expenses
B42B2A Great Lakes Program - Abatement Control and
Compliance
J42B2A Great Lakes Program - Abatement Control and
Compliance Carryover
This activity includes funding for the Great Lakes
program and demonstration grants authorized
by Section 108(a) of the Clean Water Act. The
Great Lakes National Program Office integrates
and consolidates EPA Great Lakes activities
and provides support to the International
Joint Commission (IJC) complying with the 1978
U.S.-Canada Water Quality Agreement.
B244 Clean Lakes Program B43B2C Clean Lakes Program
- Abatement Control and Compliance
J43B2C Clean Lakes Program - Abatement Control and
Compliance Carryover
Under the Clean Lakes Program, financial assist-
ance to provided to States to carry out methods
and procedures to restore and protect the quality
of publicly owned freshwater lakes.
Chesapeake Bay Program
A44B2A Chesapeake Bay Program - Salaries and Expenses
B44B2A Chesapeake Bay Program - Abatement, Control and
Compliance
J44B2A Chesapeake Bay Program - Abatement, Control and
Compliance - Carryover
Chesapeake Bay program resources are used to
implement pollution control activities through
a State-Federal partnership with the Bay States.
These resources are used to manage matching
grants, monitor the Bay's mainstream, develop
predictive models, maintain the Bays computer
system and provide technical assistance to the
States.
D-84
-------
29
Financial Assistance
B47B2C Control Agency Resource Supplementation; Section
106 Grants - Abatement Control and Compliance
J47B2C Control Agency Resource Supplementation; Section
106 Grants - Abatement Control and Compliance
Carryover
Section 106 grants supplement State resources
for water pollution control programs. They are
negotiated annually with 50 States, 7 territories,
and 6 interstate compact agencies. Funds are
directed to cover a wide range of water quality
programs including permits, enforcement, monitoring,
construction grants program management, planning,
nonpoint source control, and other priority
programs.
Ocean Disposal
A49B2D Ocean Disposal Permits - Salaries and Expenses
B49B2D Ocean Disposal Permits - Abatement Control
and Compliance
The Ocean Disposal program resources provide for
the regulation of ocean disposal by discharge,
incineration and by dumping, designation of
disposal sites, review and approval of permits
for ocean disposal whether by incinerator or
dumping, Monitoring of disposal sites and methods,
preparation of annual report to Congress on the
Oceans, development of ocean related policies,
and participation in interagency programs that
deal with development of ocean resources.
D-85
-------
30
Enforcement
Water Quality Enforcement
AFEB3A Water Quality Enforcement - Salaries and Expenses
BFEB3A Water Quality Enforcement - Abatement Control
and Compliance
JFEB3A Water Quality Enforcement - Abatement Control
and Compliance Carryover
The Water Duality Enforcement program element
provides resources to support all activities
necessary for compliance with permit conditions,
specific activities include: 1) monitoring
compliance of municipal and industrial discharges
with NPDES permit conditions under both the
regular NPDES program for direct discharges as
well as the pretreatment program for POTWs and
industries which discharge into them. 2) initiating
administrative enforcement actions; 3) providing
technical support to the Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Monitoring for litigation against
violations of NPDES permits; 4) providing technical
support for the issuance of administrative
actions against violations of Spill Prevention
Control and Countermeasure Plans; and 5) maintaining
a national ADP system for management, control,
and manipulation of information in support of
permit issuance and water quality enforcement
activities; and providing support in questions
of jurisdiction under § 404 as well as enforcement
in support of Section 311.
These resources do not fund legal enforcement
under OECM.
D-86
-------
31
Water Quality Enforcement - Office of Legal and
Enforcement Counsel
BOFB3A Water Quality Enforcement - Office of Legal and
Enforcement Counsel - Abatement Control and
Compliance
This program element provides contract funds to
support a portion of the enforcement data system
and to assist in case development and training
activities related to Water Quality Enforcement.
Permit Issuance
AFDB3B Permit Issuance - Salaries and Expenses
BFDB3B Permit Issuance - Abatement Control and Compliance
JFDB3B Permit Issuance - Abatement Control and Compliance
- Carryover
The Permit Issuance program element provides
resources to support those activities required
to draft and issue municipal and industrial
permits. Specific activities include: 1) receiving,
processing and reviewing permit applications;
2) developing permit conditions and monitoring
requirements 3) issuing and revising NPDES permits
and; 4) providing assistance in the development
of State programs for both the regular NPDES
and pretreatment programs and; 5) carrying out
a wide variety of technical assistance and
oversight of delegated State programs.
Resources also provide technical support for
evidentiary hearings held on the terms, conditions,
and effluent limitations in permits and requests
for variances from permit effluent limitations.
EPA also conducts nonadversarial panel hearings
for municipalities which have requested marine
discharge modifications under Section 301(h) of
the Clean Water Act.
X5XB20 Water Quality Reimbursables
D-87
-------
32
Drinking Water
Research and Development
Drinking Water Non - Energy
ABJC1A Scientific Assessment - Salaries and
Expenses
CBJC1A Scientific Assessment - Research and
Development
This program will provide assessments expertise
and technical assistance in support of drinking
water regulations, health advisories, methodology
development, and other guidance to States and
operations.
ABLC1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
CRLC1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
This work is designed to support monitoring pro-
cedures and quality control requirements under
Section 1401, 1413 and 1442 of the Safe Drinking
Water Act. The monitoring research program pro-
vides support to standards development and com-
pliance and support to quality assurance require-
ments related to certification of State labora-
tories under State primacy enforcement liabilities.
On-site evaluations of EPA Regional laboratories
support the Drinking Water Certification Program,
whereby Regional laboratories are responsible for
certifying quality assurance of State laboratories.
Groundwater program investigations are conducted.
This supports EPA's broad groundwater research
plan, including research to assist compliance
with the 'TIC program.
D-88
-------
33
ABMC1A Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CBMCIA Health Effects - Research and Development
This program element Identifies substances
which occur in drinking water in sufficient
numbers to warrant Agency evaluation for possible
national regulations and determines the health
impact of those organic, inorganic and microbio-
logical contaminants in drinking water to support
the revision of the National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations and emergency response to
localized contamination problems. Research
emphasis will be on toxicological effects, dis-
infection and its by products and epidemiological
studies.
ABNC1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CBNC1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
Activities in this program will focus on tech-
nology to assist water utilities in complying
with drinking water regulations with particular
emphasis on small systems. Areas included are:
maintaining microbial quality in distribution
systems; treatment technologies and control of
corrosion and unwanted additives.
ABPC1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
CBPC1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
KBPC1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development Carryover
In order to provide the scientific bases for
regulatory and management decisions on the protection
of underground sources of drinking water, research
focuses on the following four areas: (1) improved
methods for determining the transport and trans-
formation of contaminants in the subsurface;
D-89
-------
34
(2) methods for predicting the hehavior of
pollutants in aquifers based on subsurface
(site-specific) characteristics and on character-
istics of the pollutants; (3) data for regulatory
and management decisions on control of specific
sources of underground water pollution; and (4)
evaluation of water source in situ reclamation
methods.
Abatement and Control
Special Studies and Demonstrations
B67C2C Special Studies and Demonstrations - Abatement
Control and Compliance
Through the Safe Drinking Water Act this program
includes grants to the National Rural Water
Association, which provides for training and
technical assistance to small rural water systems.
B68C2C Training - Abatement Control and Compliance
This program element includes institutional
grants and fellowships for professional training
in the drinking water field, covering both the
public water system supervision and ground
water protection program.
Criteria, Standards and Guidelines
A63C2B Standards and Regulations Development
- Salaries and Expenses
B63C2B Standards and Regulations Development
- Abatement Control and Compliance
Criteria, standards and guidelines includes the
entire Headquarters component of the drinking
water program. The national program is responsible
D-90
-------
35
for 1) developing drinking water standards,
encompassing risk assessments, technology evalu-
ation, and economic impact analyses along
with preparing the regulations; 2) implementing
and managing the public water systems supervision
and ground water protection programs, Including
regulation modifications, allocation of PWSS
and UIC program grants, provisions of training
and educational conferences for Regional and
State programs through grants to nonprofit
institutions such as the American Water Works
Association, guidance development, and analysis
of national compliance data; 3) assisting in
emergency conditions which threaten drinking
water supplies and sources; and 4) supporting
data management. In addition, the program
analyzes specific contaminants and their
prevalence in support of developing drinking
water standards, where appropriate. Analytical
supports is also provided to the Regions and
States in dealing with spills and incidents
of detected contamination.
Drinking Water Management
A70C2D Public Water System Supervision Program Assistance
- Salaries and Expenses
B70C2T) Public Water System Supervision Program Assistance
- Abatement Control and Compliance
This program element includes the Regional
PWSS component of the drinking water program
and includes activities related to the imple-
mentation of drinking water regulations. EPA
Regions provides support to States in devel-
oping their capability to administer a public
water system supervision program. EPA
administers programs in States which do not
have primary enforcement responsibility or
in areas in which States do not have civil
jurisdiction. Interstate carriers are certi-
fied, and assistance is provided to States
in the review and evaluation of specific
drinking water problems. State programs are
evaluated including triennial review of ex-
emptions and variances, and grant awards are
administered.
D-91
-------
36
Underground Injection Control
A71C2T) Underground Injection Control Program
- Salaries and Expenses
This program element includes Regional act-
ivities related to the implementation of the
ground water protection program. EPA provides
support to States in developing their capa-
bility to administer the UIC program. The
Agency will establish and enforce a UIC pro-
gram in States which do not have primary en-
forcement responsibility and in areas where
the States do not have civil jurisdiction.
Petitions are processed for the designation
of sole source aquifers; and a review of
Federally financed projects to determine
their impacts on aquifers in a "determined
sole source" area is conducted; States'
programs are evaluated and State permit
programs are reviewed. Grant awards are
also administered by the Regions.
Public Water. Systems Supervision Grants
B65C2C Public Water System Supervision Program Grants
- Abatement Control and Compliance
J65C2C Public Water System Supervision Program Grants
- Abatement Control and Compliance Carryover
This program element provides for financial
assistance to States with primary enforce-
ment responsibility in implementing Federally
approved safe drinking water programs.
D-92
-------
37
Underground Injection Control Program Grants
B66C2C Underground Injection Control Program Grants
- Abatement Control and Compliance
J66C2C Underground Injection Control Program, Grants
- Abatement Control and Compliance Carryover
This program element provides financial sup-
port to all States which have assumed primary
enforcement responsibility for the Under-
ground Injection Control Program. However, for
States not accepting delegation, EPA may use
funds allocated for grants to those States for
conducting UIC implementation activities in
those non-primacy States.
Drinking Water Enforcement
AFFC3A Drinking Water Enforcement
- Salaries and Expenses
Public Water System (PWS) enforcement program
encompasses the following activities; in-
vestigate violations and initiate enforcement
action against violators of the Primary Drinking
Water Regulations in States having primary en-
forcement responsibility which request such
assistance and in all nonprimacy areas and,
where necessary, initiate emergency enforcement
actions.
Underground Injection Control enforcement
activities will include approval of the en-
forcement sections of primacy applications
for State UIC programs, issuance of UIC permits
in nonprimacy States, preparation for implemen-
tation of UIC permits, investigations and initi-
ation of enforcement action against violators
of the regulations, and response to emergencies
when necessary.
D-93
-------
38
Public Water Supply Management
X5ZC20 Drinking Water Reimbursements
This program element provides workyears, reimbursed
by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, for a drinking water fluoridation
program.
Groundwater Protection
AMMC2E Groundwater Protection
- Salaries and Expenses
BMMC2E Groundwater Protection
- Abatement, Control and Compliance
This program element includes headquarters and
regional workyears to coordinate the Agency's
groundwater activities consistent with the
strategy. Applicable grants relating to ground
water activities are managed and technical
assistance is provided to the States. The
headquarters program provides guidance documents
to other agency programs to complement the
Strategy and coordinates as well conducts special
studies and analysis to broaden the Agency's
knowledge of ground water resources.
D-94
-------
39
Hazardous Waste
Research and Development
Hazardous Waste Non-Energy
ABTD1A Scientific Assessment - Salaries and Expenses
CBTD1A Scientific Assessment - Research and Development
The primary objective of the Scientific Assess-
ment program is to support regulatory develop-
ment and implementation efforts, as well as
regulatory reform efforts, by providing inform-
ation and methods necessary to determine the
magnitude of the human health and environmental
risks resulting from the disposal of hazardous
waste. A major component of this activity is
the preparation of health and environmental
effects profiles for chemicals to support
listing decisions,, These efforts directly
support the program offices in preparing
Regulatory Impact Analyses required by Exec-
utive Order 12291, as well as Agency needs
under Sections 3001, 3003, 3004, of RCRA.
ABSDIA Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
CBSDIA Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
The major objective of this program is to pro-
vide new and improved methods and guidelines
for the identification of hazardous wastes to
support regulatory development and implementation
efforts,. These efforts are focused in the
following three areas:
Monitoring Methodologies; In this area, research
develops sampling procedures for hazardous waste
operations, chemical procedures for analysis of
wastes and waste-site samples, and bio-indicator
test and ecosystem survey methods to assess the
relative hazard of complex waste mixtures on the
condition of the local environment. Research
efforts also develop methods to characterize the
subsurface and groundwater of waste sites.
D-95
-------
40
Monitoring Guidelines: Efforts in this area develop
guidelines oriented to specific applications, such
as unsaturated zone monitoring, exposure assessment,
evaluation of biological methods, post-closure
groundwater monitoring and site investigations.
These guidelines identify the data required and
the methods, protocols, and equipment to be used
to gather that data.
Quality Assurance; The objective of the quality
assurance program is to ensure that data of known
quality are being collected to support the Agency's
hazardous waste monitoring efforts. This area
supports both the methodology and guideline efforts
previously discussed. Specifically, research
efforts in this area involve development of vali-
dated and standardized methods and include:
development and evaluation of analytical standards
for instrument calibration; development and evaluation
of reference solutions for evaluation of laboratory
performance; validation of sampling, analytical and
biological methods; evaluation of Regional and
contract laboratories involved in hazardous waste
identification; and the development of equivalency
methods for validated methods.
ABVD1A Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CBVD1A Health Effects - Research and Development
The primary objective of health effects
research is to support listing and delisting
decisions and permitting and enforcement
activities by validating and implementing
short-term test systems for use in evaluating
the health effects of exposure to complex
hazardous waste mixtures. Test systems are
validated in the areas of general toxicity,
mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive
effects, teratogenicity, and neurotoxicity.
D-96
-------
41
In addition, currently available methods in
population toxicology are validated for use in
assessing impacts of hazardous wastes on
health. Methods are validated in order to
identify specific biological indicators of
both acute and chronic health effects which
can be used to measure the impact of exposure
to hazardous substances in populations (indicators
of response). These outputs are used by OSW
in development of better risk assessment
models, particularly in improving extrapolation
models which project human health effects
from animal data.
ABRIUA Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CBRD1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
KBRD1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development - Carryover
The hazardous waste environmental engineering
and technology program develops engineering
and technical data necessary to support the
agency in the development and revision of
regulations for the management of hazardous
wastes to protect human health and the environ-
ment. Major emphasis is on the evaluation of
existing land treatment technologies and on
alternative treatment technologies to land
disposal. Chemical detoxification and biologic-
ally engineered organisms to treat high hazard
waste are also evaluated.
D-97
-------
42
ABWP1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
CBWD1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
The objective of this research program is to
support regulatory development and implement-
ation efforts by providing information to
protect groundwater from the improper disposal
of hazardous wastes. Bio-assessments are
developed which enable response personnel to
determine the extent to which an area is
contaminated by hazardous spills.
In addition this program provides scientific
data for assessing the entire scope of environ-
mental impacts of hazardous waste disposal.
This work, closely coordinated with research
on groundwater, concentrates on predictive
model development and field evaluation of
both the models under development and the
method for approximating subsurface mobility
(microcosms). The program also develops
Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships
(OSAR) methods to predict the toxicity and
environmental mobility of complex wastes.
Abatement Control and Compliance
Waste Management Regulations, Guidelines and Policies
AGOD2B Regulations, Guidelines and Policies Hazardous
Waste - Salaries and Expenses
BGOD2B Regulations, Guidelines and Policies Hazardous
Waste - Abatement Control and Compliance
jnOT)2B Regulations, Guidelines and Policies Hazardous
Waste - Abatement Control and Compliance Carryover
D-98
-------
43
This program provides for management of the
National Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) Subtitle C hazardous waste program.
Included are the promulgation and refinement
of the criteria and regulations for identification,
tracking, management and disposal of hazardous
wastes. Technical studies, regulatory impact
and economic analyses, and assessments of control
options and technologies necessary for regulatory
decisionmaking are covered. Activities also include
52 the issuance of guidance to the Regions and
States for nationally consistent administration
of the Subtitle C regulations as well as evaluation
of implementation policies. This program also
provides for national management of the hazardous
waste compliance monitoring and enforcement program.
Activities include issuance of guidance, development
of policies and evaluation of State and Regional
compliance monitoring and enforcement program.
Hazardous Waste Management
A80D2D Hazardous Waste Management Regulatory Strategies
Implementation - Salaries and Expenses
B80D2D Hazardous Waste Management Regulatory Strategies
Implementation - Abatement, and Control and Compliance
J80D2D Hazardous Waste Management Regulatory Strategies
Implementation - Abatement, and Control and Compliance
- Carryover
This program incorporate the Regional activities
necessary to provide guidance to authorized
States, and to operate the RCRA mandated
hazardous waste program in unauthorized States.
Under Subtitle C of RCRA, Regions assist
States in developing substantially equivalent
hazardous waste management programs to qualify
for Interim Authorization, and fully equivalent
programs to qualify for Final Authorization.
D-99
-------
44
Regional responsibility includes operation of
a Federal program for any program phase,
including major technical evaluation and
issuance of facility permits for which States
have not received authorization, and providing
review and guidance to States operating either
authorized programs or delegated aspects of
the Federal program. This program also includes
Regional Management for the hazardous waste
grant program.
Hazardous Waste Grants
B77D2C Hazardous Waste Management Financial Assistance
to States - Abatement, Control and Compliance
J77D2C Hazardous Waste Management Financial Assistance
to States - Abatement, Control and Compliance
This program provides financial assistance to
States to develop, implement, and enforce
hazardous waste programs. State grant targets
are allocated on a formula basis that accounts
for a State's population, number of hazardous
waste.treatment, storage and disposal facilities,
and the amount of hazardous waste. The grant
amount is negotiated based on the target and
the portion of the Federal RCRA program the
State is operating.
D-100
-------
45
Enforcement
Hazardous Waste Enforcement (RT)
AGDD3A Hazardous Waste Enforcement - Salaries and
Expenses
BGDD3A Hazardous Waste Enforcement - Abatement,
Control and Compliance
This program element is responsible for im-
plementing the hazardous waste compliance
monitoring and enforcement program to ensure
compliance with RCRA Subtitle C regulations,
including permit conditions. Activities
include inspections of hazardous waste gener-
ators, transporters and treatment, storage
and disposal facilities; review of reports,
issuance of information gathering letters,
and supporting criminal investigations.
Also included in this program's responsibilities
are the issuance of administrative enforcement
actions and provision of technical assistance
for civil actions authorized under RCRA sections
3008, 7003 and 3013 to compel compliance with
appropriate regulations and, when necessary,
terminate permits or interim status. This
program is also responsible for overseeing
state inspections and reviewing the compliance
monitoring and enforcement programs of authorized
states to assure that states maintain adequate
enforcement of hazardous waste law and regulations.
D-101
-------
46
Pesticides
Research and Development
Pesticides Non-Energy
ABXE1A Scientific Assessment - Salaries and Expenses
CBXE1A Scientific Assessment - Research and Development
The program provides and reviews health risk
and exposure assessments carcinogenic, mutagenic,
and/or reproductive effects of those chemicals
identified by the Office of Pesticide Programs.
Assessments are revised in accordance with the
Science Advisory Board and other Agency review
for comments. This activity assures that pesticide
decisions reflect risk assessments consistent
with Agency requirements pursuant to the
legal mandates of FIFRA.
ABZE1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
CBZE1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
This program provides support to the Agency and
States in maintaining a quality assurance program
to ensure accurate data for regulatory decisions
and enforcement actions under the FIFRA.
This program maintains the Pesticide Repository
of high purity chemicals which are used as
standard analytical reference samples to ensure
that test data are accurate, precise and reliable.
These samples are used by over 1400 EPA (and
other Federal), State, local, academic, Industrial,
and foreign laboratories.
A recertification program assures the purity
and integrity of the reference chemicals, and
the repository's quality assurance manuals are
periodically revised to maintain their usefulness.
D-102
-------
47
ACAE1A Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CCAE1A Health Effects - Research and Development
This research will continue to support the
Office of Pesticides Program through toxicity
testing and health test protocol development
pursuant to implementation of FIFRA. Research
is developing improved animal models to assess
teratology data and reproductive risks from
pesticides, inabling the Agency to more
effectively determine the risks and henefits
resulting from pesticide usage.
Other research provides validated health assay
test methods for the pesticide industry to use
to produce a reliable data base for FIFRA
registration and enforcement programs. To
anticipate the Agency's possible future test
method needs, further research will define
the critical public health effects of biological
pesticides.
ACBE1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
CCRE1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
This research supports the Office of Pesticides
program with information to: develop and modify
test guidelines; base the registration and
re-registration of pesticides; review Agency
enforcement activities.
These research activities identify, develop,
refine and evaluate: the effects of biological
control agents and chemical pesticides; modeling
approaches for assessments of pesticide per-
turbations on natural aquatic ecosystems; and
pesticide distribution, transport, fate and
exposure levels in aquatic and terrestrial
environments.
D-103
-------
48
AKXEIA Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CKXEIA Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
This program element includes the following
activities: laboratory studies on the per-
meability and penetrability by highly toxic
pesticides compounds for various fabric and
rubber compounds used for protective clothing;
classes of pesticides, formulation types and
concentration types of prbtective clothing and
equipment, and test methods are identified,
prioritized, and evaluated.
Abatement Control and Compliance
Generic Chemical Reviews
AJRE2M Generic Chemical Reviews - Salaries and Expenses
BJRE2M Generic Chemical Reviews - Abatement Control and
Compliance
JJRE2M Generic Chemical Reviews - Abatement Control and
Compliance Carryover
This program focuses primarily on establishing
Registration Standards and conducting Special
Reviews (formerly entitled Rebuttable Presumption
against Registration (RPAR) reviews). The
principal goals of the Registrations Standard
program are to streamline registration and
reregistration actions and update decision
data base in accordance with current scientific
standards and regulatory policy. The process
of establishing of a registration standard is
divided into three phases: (1) data gathering,
(2) data evaluation, and (3) developing and
issuing registration standard guidance packages.
Within this process pesticide residue tolerances,
established under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) are reviewed and respecified
(This activity is funded under the tolerances
subactivity). The goal of the Special Review
program is to evaluate pesticides which have
been identified as having a potential for producing
significant adverse health or environmental
D-104
-------
49
effects. The special review process includes
reviewing possible substitutes for suspect
chemicals, assessing possible regulatory options,
as well as other actions which would reduce
risk and exposure. These special review evalu1-
ations result in either the return of the chemical
to the normal registration process (if risk
concerns are not borne out by the review), or
In an increased regulatory stance restricting
or prohibiting specific uses of the chemical.
New special review candidates will be identified
through the registration standards process.
Special Registration
A94E2K Special Registration - Salaries and Expenses
The special registration program performs an
auxiliary function to the registration process
by: (1) allowing experimentation with non-
registered products or uses to develop data
needed for registration; (2) establishing safe
pesticide residue (tolerance) levels for crops
to be marketed following the application of
experimental use pesticides; (3) permitting
the use of unregistered pesticides or the use
of pesticides for sites/pests not included in
their registration to meet pest emergencies
when the benefits of such use exceed the risk;
(4) reviewing State registration of pesticides
distributed and used only within the registering
State for special local needs, to determine if
proper tolerances have been established and the
chemicals involved have not been suspended or
cancelled; and (5) approving and reviewing
State experimental use permit programs for
special local needs registration.
D-105
-------
50
Registration
A93E2K Registration - Salaries and Expenses
B93E2K Registration - Abatement Control and Compliance
Under the registration program, new pesticide
products are registered and current registrations
are amended to add uses and/or new formulations.
Pesticide registrations are accomplished by:
(1) reviewing the registration application and
supporting data to ensure that the use of the
product will not result in "unreasonable adverse
effect" to man or the environment; (2) limiting
the risks associated with use through label
precautions, special packaging requirements,
application directions, and, where necessary,
restriction of use to trained applicators; and
(3) providing incentives, through reduced data
requirements and more rapid review, for environ-
mentally safe pesticides.
Tolerances
A95E2K Tolerances - Salaries and Expenses
The tolerance program fulfills the requirements
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) as it applies to pesticide products.
Under FFDCA, before a pesticide can be registered
under FIFRA for use on a food or feed crop, the
Agency must either establish a tolerance for
that use, stating the maximal residue limits
permissible, or grant an exemption from the
tolerance requirement. By statute, food and
feed additive petitions must be processed within
180 days and raw agricultural commodity petitions
must be processed within 120 days.
D-106
-------
51
Enforcement
Pesticides Enforcement
AFKE3A Pesticides Enforcement - Salaries and Expenses
BFKE3A Pesticides Enforcement - Abatement Control and
Compliance
BFKE3A Pesticides Enforcement - Abatement Control and
Compliance - Carryover
The EPA pesticides enforcement program covers
approximately 10,000 firms involved in the
production of pesticides sold and distributed
in the United States as well as millions of
persons using those pesticides. The program
emphasizes gaining compliance by the pesticide
industry and users with registration, classific-
ation, and labeling requirements.
EPA is striving to ensure that State governments
participate to the maximum extent in the national
pesticides compliance program. To this end,
EPA provides oversight and management to State
cooperative grants-in-aid and certification
and training programs.
The pesticide enforcement program will prepare
and issue notices of violations and administrative
orders in instances where compliance by other
means first cannot be achieved. Also, the
enforcement program will assists and support
the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring
(OECM) in the development of civil and criminal
referrals.
The EPA pesticide enforcement program also
provides compliance assistance to the agri-
cultural chemicals industry, commercial and
private applicators, user groups, and States.
D-107
-------
52
Pesticides Enforcement Grants
BFJE3A Pesticides Enforcement Grants - Abatement Control
and Compliance
Pesticide enforcement grants, funded by EPA,
provide for the bulk of pesticide compliance
monitoring activities in.the United States.
Under the terms of these cooperative agreements,
States inspect pesticide producer establishments;
provide marketplace surveillance; investigate
pesticide use, misuse, and field reentry questions.
The agreements also fund States in surveying
pesticide imoorts, inspecting pesticide dealer
records and reviewing commercial applicator
records.
Pesticides Certification and Training
B8XE3A Pesticides Certification and Training - Abatement
Control and Compliance
J8XE3A Pesticides Certification and Training - Abatement
Control and Compliance - Carryover
Pesticides certification and training insures
that highly toxic, restricted use pesticides
are handled, applied, and stored only by compet-
ent, trained applicators. Funds for training
applicators are transferred to the U.S. Depart-
ment of Agriculture for distribution to State
Cooperative Extension Services. Certification
funds are distributed through grants to designated
State agencies. Funds are used by the States
for certification activities, such as developing
and grading exams, issuing credentials, monitor-
ing training, and keeping records of certified
applicators. EPA also provides funding for
Federal certification and training programs in
States that have elected not to conduct their
own certification and training programs.
D-108
-------
53
Radiation
Research and Development
Non-Ionizing Radiation
ACFF1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Salaries and Expenses
CCFF1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
- Research and Development
The monitoring program has two primary focuses.
The first is to conduct a radiocheraical analytical
quality assurance program in support of Federal,
Regional, State and local laboratories which
assess radionuclide activities in air, water,
milk and food as a result of nuclear facility
activities. The second focus is the operation
of a comprehensive off-site radiological surveill-
ance program at the Nevada Test Site to support
the on-site nuclear testing activities of the
Department of Energy (DOE). This second function
is operated under a Memorandum of Understanding
with DOE.
ACOF1A Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CCGF1A Health Effects - Research and Development
KCGF1A Health Effects - Research and Development
- Carryover
The function of the health effects program is to
generate scientific data which support the
Office of Radiation Program's effort to produce
federal radiation protection guidance for control-
ling public exposure to radio waves, including
microwaves. Specifically, the program develops
information on the health effects and actual
human health risks associated with exposure to
the wide range of nonionizing radiation (NIR)
frequencies introduced into the environment.
D-109
-------
XLUF10 Las Vegas Radiation Off site - Reimbursable
X6EH10 Interdisciplinary - Reimbursable/ORD
X6JK10 ORD Unissued - Reimbursable
Abatement and Control
Radiation Criteria, Standards and Guidelines Abatement
Control and Compliance
A99F2R Radiation Criteria Standards and Guidelines - Salaries
and Expenses
B99F2B Radiation Criteria Standards and Guidelines - Abatement
Control and Compliance
Radiation environmental standards and guide-
lines are developed and promulgated under this
program. These standards and guidelines pro-
tect the public health and the environment by
minimizing risk of radiation exposures from
nuclear energy applications, naturally occurring
radioactive materials, medical and occupational
radiation exposure and nonionizing radiation.
Radiation Program Implementation
AIDF2D Radiation Program Implementation - Salaries
and Expenses
This program supports activities of EPA's
Regional offices including: reviewing rou-
tine environmental impact statements (e.g.,
lightwater reactors providing direct assis-
tance to State and local governments with
special radiation problems of a short-term
nature; participation in the reviewing and
testing of State radiological emergency re-
sponse plans; and providing the radiological
expertise needed by the Regions to manage
radiological problems associated with the
drinking water and hazardous waste programs.
D-110
-------
55
Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
AHWF2R Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
- Salaries and Expenses
BHWF2R Radiation Environmental Impact Assessment
- Abatement, Control and Compliance
Activities in this area provide the information
necessary to identify and analyze potential
radiological health problems having public
health impact, and to support the development of
standards and guidelines. Also encompassed under
this program is the monitoring of environmental
radiation, as well as laboratory analysis,
technology 'assessments, emergency preparedness,
and emergency response.
Radiation
XLITFIO Las Vegas Radiation Off site Reimbursable
D-lll
-------
56
Toxic Substances
Research and Development
Chemical Testing and Assessment Non-Energy
ACPL1A Scientific Assessment - Salaries and Expenses
CCPL1A Scientific Assessment - Research and Development
The Scientific Assessment program provides
scientific evaluations and assessments to the
Office of Toxic Substances on 'monitoring and
risk assessment issues. The program also develops
defensible methods to estimate the magnitude of
adverse health and environmental impacts related
to the production, use, and disposal of chemicals.
ACML1A Stratospheric Modification - Salaries and Expenses
CCMI.1A Stratospheric Modification - Research and Development
Stratospheric Modification research is mandated
by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. The
purpose of the Stratospheric Modification
program is to provide state-of-the-art knowledge
and coordinate research on the causes, effects,
and control of stratospheric ozone depletion.
ACRL1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance - Salaries
and Expenses
CCRL1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance - Research
and Development
The Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance
program develops methods, protocols and monitor-
ing systems to ensure that the Agency's testing
and evaluation procedures produce precise,
accurate data. The exposure monitoring research
is developing monitoring data to corroborate
the lab and model exposure data used in risk
assessments. This program is also developing
monitoring systems to link environmental con-
centrations of chemicals to human exposure.
The Quality assurance effort is devising
protocols and guidelines for valid chemical
and biological measurements.
D-112
-------
57
ACSL1A Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CCSL1A Health Effects - Research and Development
Health effects research is designed to develop
and improve test guidelines and data mandated
by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
The test method development program focuses
on costeffective short-term screening tests
as well as longer—term tests and systems for
tiertesting. To address concerns with muta-
genicity, carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity, and
adverse reproductive and teratological effects,
as well as pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and
cardiovascular effects, research is being
conducted on risk assessment methodologies
and structure-activity relationships.
ACTL1A Environmental Engineering and Technology - Salaries
and Expenses
CCTL1A Environmental Engineering and Technology - Research
and Development
The Environmental Engineering and Technology
program provides engineering and other analyses
of chemical manufacturing methods regarding
the to meet the Agency's needs for predictive
capabilities in assessing release and exposure
of chemicals in the review of premanufacture
notice for new chemicals as required by TSCA.
ACUL1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Salaries
and Expenses
CCITL1A Environmental Processes and Effects - Research
and Development
The Environmental Processes and Effects program
1) develops, improves, and validates test methods
for defining ecosystem hazards of chemicals
under TSCA; 2) identifies chemical transport
and transformation processes, including the
development of structure-activity models in
support of premanufacturing and new use reviews;
and 3) provides technical assistance to the
Office of Toxic Substances.
.D-113
-------
58
BMSL2C Asbestos in Schools - Abatement Loan and Grants
- Abatement, Control and Compliance
This program is responsible for implementing
the requirements of the Asbestos School Hazard
Abatement Act (ASHAA). This includes developing
the appropriate guidelines and standards needed
to ensure that proper guidance is available
to interested parties. When fully implemented
the program will provide financial assistance
to schools either through loans, grants, or a
combination loan and grant, to carry out asbestos
abatement activities.
Abatement Control and Compliance
Chemical Testing
AJNL2S Chemical Testing - Salaries and Expenses
BJNL2S Chemical Testing - Abatement Control and Compliance
Activities in the Chemical Testing program
include; a) evaluation of Interagency Testing
Committee (ITC) designated chemicals, b) develop-
ment of test rules, notices of decision not to
test, and test guidelines, c) negotiation of
voluntary testing agreements, d) audits of
laboratories conducting testing, e) annual
review of test guidelines and f) processing of
test rule exemptions and administration of the
reimbursement program as required under Section
4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
D-1U
-------
59
Existing Chemicals Review
AJPL2S Existing Chemical Review - Salaries and Expenses
BJPL2S Existing Chemical Review - Abatement Control and
Compliance
JJPL2S Existing Chemical Review - Abatement Control and
Compliance Carryover
Activities in the Existing Chemicals Review
program include: a) screening and conducting
hazard/risk assessments of existing chemicals,
by evaluating their impacts on health, environ-
ment, social and economic factors, b) identify-
ing and implementing the least burdensome type
of control (regulatory or nonregulatory)
necessary to reduce or prevent unreasonable
risks, c) performing exposure studies to predict
problems with chemicals in the environment,
d) obtaining information from industry to assess
chemical hazards and provide the basis for
regulatory or nonregulatory control action, and
e) supporting the coordination and integration
of toxic substances policies and activities
with those of other EPA programs and other
Federal agencies.
New Chemical Review
AJOL2S New Chemicals Review - Salaries and Expenses
BJQL2S New Chemicals Review - Abatement Control and
Compliance
Activities in the New Chemicals Review program
include: a) screening, detailed assessment, and
control of chemicals submitted to EPA under the
Premanufacture Notification Review (PMN) and
Test Market Exemption programs, b) development
and processing of exemptions from the PMN pro-
gram, c) development of Significant New Use
Rules, d) development of Section 8(a) information
follow-up rules.
D-115
-------
60
Toxics Integration
AHZL25 Toxics Integration - Salaries and Expenses
BHZ125 Toxics Integration - Abatement Control
and Compliance
This program includes (1) intra-Agency integr-
ation of chemical-by-chemical regulatory pro-
grams and activities; and (2) assistance to States
and localities in establishing new toxic substances
control programs and in.coordinating and integrating
existing programs to promote more effective operations.
Enforcement
Toxic Substances Enforcemejit
AFLL3A Toxic Substances Enforcement - Salaries and
Expenses
RFLL3A Toxic Substances Enforcement - Abatement Control
and Compliance
The toxic substances enforcement program ensures
compliance with TSCA rules and regulations.
Headquarters provides enforcement support to
the TSCA regulatory development process; designs,
implements, and oversees compliance monitoring
activities by developing guidance strategies,
and procedures; provides technical compliance
assistance; and prepares and initiates civil
administrative enforcement actions and provides
technical support to Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Vfonitoring (OCEM) case prosecutions.
D-116
-------
61
Regional offices respond to special risk situ-
ations; inspect facilities that manufacture,
process, distribute or use new or specifically
regulated chemicals; and monitor laboratories
performing tests pursuant to TSCA testing rules
or voluntary testing agreements. Regional
offices also assist the regulated community in
complying with all applicable TSCA regulations
and seek voluntary remedial action in lieu of
enforcement prosecution where appropriate.
In cases where voluntary compliance is not
achieved, Regional personnel prepare and initiate
civil administrative enforcement actions and
provide technical support to OCEM case prosecutions.
Toxic Substance Enforcement Grants
B8TL3A Toxic Substances Enforcement Grants - Abatement
Control and Compliance
The major function of this program is to provide
States with financial assistance to stimulate
development of cooperative agreements for compliance
monitoring and enforcement of the Toxic Substance
Control Act (TSCA) and its regulations.
D-117
-------
62
Energy
Research and Development
Multi-Media Energy
ACYN1A Health Effects - Salaries and Expenses
CCYN1A Health Effects - Research and Development
The health effects program develops and upgrades
risk analysis methodologies for evaluating
population level impacts of synfuel pollutants
on health and the environment through the
integration of exposure and effects assessments.
ACZN1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Salaries and Expenses
CCZN1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development
KCZN1A Environmental Engineering and Technology
- Research and Development - Carryover
This research program has two major objectives:
To develop, evaluate, and demonstrate the
Limestone Injection Multi-State Burner (LIMB)
control technology and to characterize and
evaluate synfuel discharges and control
technologies. The control technology inform-
ation may be used by synthetic fuel 'developers
to select the most costeffective control tech-
nologies, and may be utilized by EPA program
offices to develop industry-specific standards
in the future.
The Limestone Injection Burner process for low
cost removal of sulfur and nitrogen oxides from
combustion fuel gases is being researched and
evaluated to develop essential technical inform-
ation.
D-118
-------
63
ACVNIA Acid Rain— Salaries and Expenses
CCVNIA Acid Rain - Research and Development
KCVNIA Acid Rain - Research and Development
- Carryover
This research is addressing the scientific and
technical questions surrounding the causes,
effects and potential solutions for acid deposi-
tion. Some of the areas to be addressed include:
understanding and quantifying terrestrial effects
providing research for policy analyses; under-
standing aquatic and atmospheric effects; and
estimating the emissions from man-made sources.
Results of acid precipitation research will
contribute to major components of the National
Acid Precipitation Assessment Program.
CDAN1A Environmental Processes and Effects
This research program was designed to complement
the research conducted in the Energy Health
Effects program. It is part of the integrated
risk assessment program which is designed to
develop methods for estimating the health and
environmental risks associated with emerging
energy processes.
Oxidants Energy
M9AN1B Health Effects - Energy Research and Development
This is a court-mandated study designed
to assess the relationship between ozone
levels and pulmonary problems in asthmatics.
D-119
-------
Scientific Activities Overseas
Scientific Activities Overseas (SAO) are funded
from excess foreign currencies accruing to the
United States from the sale of agricultural
commodities under PL 480. The use of these
currencies enables EPA to engage in unique
environmental research programs which establish
and strengthen links between EPA and foreign
agencies and institutions that have mutual
interests in seeking solutions to environmental
problems. The SAO program supports the Agency's
international goals, and is designed to: (1)
augment EPA's multimedia data base, (2) assist
in the solution of environmental problems by
merging the expertise of U.S. and foreign
investigators, (3) extend new technology
into a broader world community, (4) assists in
meeting EPA international agreements, and (5)
develop and/or demonstrate new technologies
including sampling, modeling, and control
strategies.
Scientific Activities Overseas
E5KR6Z Scientific Activities Overseas
E5RR68 Scientific Activities Overseas
E5LR61 Scientific Activities Overseas - India - Office of
International Activities Travel
This program element provides resources for travel to
India for the Office of International Activities.
EDHA61 - SAO - India - Air
E40B61 - SAO - India - Water Ouality
E45B68 - SAO - Pakistan - Water Ouality
E5FH61 - SAO - India - Interdisciplinary
E4LK69 - SAO - Undistributed
E7ZL61 - SAO - Toxic Substances
D-120
-------
65
Superfund
Research and Development
Hazardous Substances Non-Energy
TEPYIA Scientific Assessment - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
This program provides an array of health hazard,
toxicity, and exposure information to headquarters
and Regional office activities associated with
chemical and site-specific uncontrolled waste
site problems; Site-specific, situation and
chemical specific health risk assessments are
prepared to assist the program office in eval-
uating alternative causes of action at uncontrolled
sites and potential regulatory strategies.
Outputs include: health summaries; health profiles
for preliminary site evaluations; full health
and risk assessments with exposure data for
high priority waste sites and preparation of
comprehensive health assessment methodologies
for assessing the hazards of uncontrolled sites.
SEGY1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance - Hazardous
Substance Response - Carryover
TRGY1A Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
The major objective of this program is to support
our program implementation requirements with
the latest research methods and techniques in
measurement, monitoring and quality assurance.
The program meets the monitoring requirements
for removal and remedial actions required by the
Act. The tools and methods for field support
and sampling, laboratory analyses, and remote
monitoring are applied to site discovery and
characterization, as well as mitigation and
cleanup. The program includes quality assurance
through use of a referee laboratory, laboratory
audits and intercomparison analyses.
D-121
-------
66
SEJY1A Environmental Engineering and Technology - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
THJY1A Environmental Engineering and Technology - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
The primary objectives of this program are to
support Superfund implementation requirements
by providing engineering guidance and control
technology evaluation to the Federal, State and
local agencies for immediate response to
uncontrolled waste sites.
In general, this objective addresses the field
evaluation of equipment and technologies for
on-site treatment/destruction of hazardous wastes,
leachates and contaminated groundwater. It also
evaluates and assesses the best existing remedial
control technologies to minimize pollutant release
from uncontrolled hazardous waste sites, and
maximizes the applicability and transfer of this
information to the user community. Specialized
equipment and procedures to ensure the health and
safety of on-site personnel during removal and
cleanup operations are tested and evaluated.
TFKY1A Environmental Processes and Effects
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
The primary objective of this program is to
support Superfund implementation efforts by
providing Federal, State and local agencies
with assessment and evaluation procedures for
determining the potential ecological effects
from uncontrolled waste sites. Activities
include groundwater sampling and bioassessments
of soil and water samples from Superfund sites.
A primary focus is on providing user-oriented
materials for situation assessment along with
evaluating and developing ecologically sound
isolation, removal, restoration and disposal
methods.
D-122
-------
67
Enforcement
Hazardous Substance Technical Enforcement
TGBY3A Hazardous Substance Technical Enforcement - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
SGBY3A Hazardous Substance Technical Enforcement - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program element is the technical component
of the Superfund Enforcement program. A ma.lor
responsibility of this program element is to
identify responsible parties. In support of
this program, an ADP system is operated to
track operations and provide management with
operating statistics. As a part of negotiations
of court ordered or voluntary consent decrees,
technical enforcement develops remedial action
plans for submission to defendants, reviews
plans presented by defendants to assure technical
adequacy and consistency with consent decree
goals, and monitors privately financed cleanup.
A major effort in this program will be to develop
and implement procedures to ensure that technical
information in support of enforcement, including
cost recovery cases, is legally defensible and
of a high quality. In addition, this program
will review and analyze the technical aspects
of policies and regulations developed under
the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
to ensure their validity and *defensibility in
potential enforcement actions.
Technical Support - OCEM
TFZY3A Technical Support Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
SFZY3A Technical Support Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program comprises the Superfund portion of
the activities of the National Enforcement Investigations
Center (NEIC) in Denver, Colorado which is contained
D-123
-------
68
within the organization of the Office of Enforce-
ment and Compliance Monitoring (OECM).
The NEIC provides technical support to various
aspects of the Superfund enforcement program;
with emphasis on specialized technical case
support for high hazard and high priority en-
forcement cases as well as national expertise
and specialized services not normally avail-
able at Headquarters or in the Regions. The
NEIC focus is cm provision of specialized
investigatory assistance, technical support for
case development for recovery of funds expended
for cleanup or other remedies, continuing update
and refinement of enforcement analytical procedures
including high hazard laboratory procedures,
high hazard sample analysis associated with the
development of priority enforcement cases,
technical support of regulation and guidance
development for the Agency's Superfund enforcement
program, and specialized assistance to State
enforcement activities.
Hazardous Substance Legal Enforcement
TJBY3A Hazardous Substance Legal Enforcement - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
SJBY3A Hazardous Substance Legal Enforcement - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program provides the legal staff for enforcement
efforts under the Superfund program. The major
activities in this program are focused on developing
the legal documentation necessary to induce
privately financed cleanup of hazardous waste
sites and spills. In cooperation with the
technical enforcement staff, this program will
issue demand letters, administrative orders
and participate with the Department of Justice
legal staff in negotiations of consent decrees.
In addition, EPA legal staff will work with the
Department of Justice to initiate cost recovery
actions when a fund-financed response has
been taken. Finally, this program will enable
EPA to ensure a nationally consistent enforcement
policy under Superfund.
D-124
-------
69
Superfund
Management and Support
Hazardous Substance Financial Management Headquarters
TGZY5A Hazardous Substance Financial Management Headquarters
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
SHZY5A Hazardous Substance Financial ManagemenF"Headquarters
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund — Carryover
This program element provides centralized coordin-
ation of financial records and management of
the Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund on
a site specific basis.
Hazardous Substance - OPPE
TGVY5A Hazardous Substance Office of Policy, Planning
and Evaluation - Hazardous Substance Response Trust
Fund
This program element provides resources for policy
analysis, management assessments and evaluations,
and regulatory review under the Superfund program.
Hazardous Substance Comptroller
TKITY5A Hazardous Substance Office of the Comptroller
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
SKTTY5A Hazardous Substance Office of the Comptroller
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program element provides the resources for
budget development and oversight, response to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
Congressional inquiries, program analysis,
issuance of allowances and budget control mechanisms,
and resources analyses on critical Issues pertaining
to Superfund.
D-125
-------
70
Hazardous Substance Financial Management Regions
TENY5A Hazardous Substance Financial Management Regions
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
This program element provides resources to maintain
financial records, and to track and report on
the use of the Hazardous Substance Response
Trust Fund on a site specific basis.
Hazardous Substance Administrative Management Headquarters
TEPY5A Hazardous Substance Administrative Management
Headquarters - Hazardous Substance ResponseTrust
Fund
SRPY5A Hazardous Substance Administrative Management
Headquarters - Hazardous Substance Response Trust
Fund - Carryover
This program element provides administrative
support to the Superfund program. These activities
Include personnel administration, contracts,
award and management, ADP systems planning and
design support, and technical assistance and
evaluation of field and laboratory safety programs.
TERY5A Hazardous Substance Support Services Headquarters
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
5ERY5A Hazardous Substance Support Services Headquarters
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program element funds Superfund support
service*. Included are the nationwide eoiti
for rent, long distance telephone, postage,
health and safety training and headquarters
support costs for janitorial, heusekeeping, and
other general support eo§6 items.
-------
71
TFCY5A Computer Services - Hazardous Substance Response
Trust Fund
This program element covers the data processing
costs (timesharing) of maintaining the Superfund
Information systems.
Hazardous Substance ORD - Laboratory Support
TLXY5A Hazardous Substance ORD - Laboratory Support
This program element provides the resources
necessary for the operation and maintenance
of EPA/ORD laboratories to ensure the safe
handling of toxics and other hazardous substances
in support of Superfund research.
Hazardous Substance Administrative Management Regions
TETY5A Hazardous Substance Administrative Management
Regions Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
SETY5A Hazardous Substance Administrative Management
Regions - Hazardous Substance Response Trust
Fund - Carryover
This program element provides resources for admin-
istrative support to the Regions including
management of information systems, small purchase
administration and coordination between financial,
contracts, and procurement management, relating
to the Superfund program.
TEUY5A Hazardous Substance Support Services Regions
-Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
SEUY5A Hazardous Substance Support Services Regions
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program element provides resources to cover
the costs for space, utilities, printing, equipment,
and other support needs incurred by the Superfund
program staff, in the Regional offices.
D-127
-------
72
Hazardous Substance Inspector General
TEVY5A Hazardous Substance - Inspector General
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust
Fund
This program element funds the required preaward,
interim and final audits of contracts awarded
under the Superfund program as well as audits
of Cooperative Agreements with the States.
Hazardous Substances Legal Services
TEWY5A Hazardous Substances Legal Services - Headquarters
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
SEWY5A Hazardous Substances Legal Services - Headquarters
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program element funds the Office of the
General Counsel (OGC) under Superfund. These
activities include statutory interpretations
of the Act, (CERCLA), and the issuance of opinions
and advice regarding the use of the Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund and other financial,
administrative or legal issues. In addition, OGC
acts as the Agency's chief counsel in defending
regulatory and other Agency decisions regarding
the implementation of CERCLA and provides support
for the enforcement litigation program.
TEYY5A Hazardous Substances Legal Services - Regions
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
This program element funds the Offices of the
Regional Counsel activities under Superfund.
These activities include statutory interpretations
of the Act, (CERCLA), and the issuance of opinions
and advice regarding the use of the Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund and other financial,
administrative or legal issues. The Offices of
the Regional Counsel advise and assist the Regions
and States in interpreting the Act and represent
Regions in defensive litigation activities.
D-128
-------
73
Hazardous Substance Response Actions
Interagency Support
Executive Order 12316, signed by the-President
in August of 1981, requires EPA to manage an
interagency budget process culminating in a con-
solidated budget request for the entire Superfund
program to OMB and Congress. The activities of
other Federal agencies are divided into two basic
categories. The first category includes those
activities which are episodic in nature and taken
in direct support of site or spill response actions.
Funds to support these activities are included in
the Hazardous. Spill and Site Response program
element (TFAY9A). The second category of Federal
Agency involvement concerns support for ongoing
activities such as basic management structure, and
the development of policies, guidelines and manuals,
EPA transfers these resources through allocation
transfers.
TJGY9C Interagency Support HHS - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
SJGY9C Interagency Support HHS - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund - Carryover
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
within the Department of Health and Human Services
provides a variety of health related services to the
Superfund program. These include evaluation of health
data for health implications, health guidance development
of a toxicological data base, collection of baseline
data for comprehensive health studies.
TJHY9C Interagency Support - USCG - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
SJHY.9C Interagency Support - USCG - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund - Carryover
The United States Coast Guard (USCG) provides support to
the Superfund program for spills of hazardous substances
in coastal zones and the Great Lakes. The USCG provides
training to maintain a response capability and maintain
the National Response Center.
D-129
-------
74
TKLY9C Interagency Support - DPI - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
This program element provides for Departmental
participation on the National Response Team
and intra-Departmental direction to DOI's nine
Bureaus. This element also provides for direc-
tion, guidance, and coordination in carrying
out DOI's responsibilities as a trustee for
natural resources. It allows for the establish-
ment and maintenance of a damage assessment
capability.
TLMY9C Interagency Support - OSHA - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
The Occupational Health and Safety Administration
(OSHA) provides the Superfund program with assistance
on the health and safety of on-site personnel, and
develops guidelines to improve current methods of
worker protection.
TJJY9C Interagency Support - DOJ - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
SJJY9C Interagency Support - DOJ - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is conducts all
litigation arising under CF.RCLA. EPA prepares
the required technical and legal documentation
and cooperates with DOJ in the negotiation and
consent decrees for privately financed response
actions.
D-130
-------
75
TJKY9C Interagency Support - FEMA - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
SJKY9C Interagency Support - FEMA - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
Under CERCLA, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) provides permanent and temporary
relocation housing for individuals whose health
is threatened by hazardous waste sites. EPA
supports FEMA in establishing the necessary
core staffs to effectively carry out delegated
functions.
TJMY9C Interagency Support - NOAA - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
SJMY9C Interagency Support - NOAA - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund - Carryover
The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Admin-
istration provides the Superfund program with
the necessary scientific support and expertise
required under CERCLA to respond to releases of
hazardous waste in coastal zones.
TKSY9C Interagency Support - FEMA Relocation - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
SKSY9C Interagency Support - FEMA Relocation - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program element provides resources to support
the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA)
relocation activities at hazardous waste sites
or incidents. These activities include the
permanent relocation of residents businesses or
community facilities.
D-131
-------
76
Hazardous Emergency and Remedial Response
TFAY9A Hazardous Spill and Site Response - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund
SFAY9A Hazardous Spill and Site Response - Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund - Carryover
This program is responsible for protecting
public health and the environment from the
dangers associated with release of hazardous
substances into the environment. The activities
include responding to releases of hazardous
substances and clean up of abandoned and
uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Authority
to carry out these activities is provided by the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Funds to
implement the program are provided from the Hazardous
Substance Response Trust Fund which is composed of
excise taxes imposed on oil and chemical industries
and revenues from the General Fund cost recoveries
from responsible parties, and return or investment
of the Fund.
This program element provides resources to implement
an emergency response program to deal with the
most serious releases of hazardous substance
spills and site emergencies where the responsible
party or State and local governments are unable
to respond adequately.
Assessing and Replacing Natural Resources
TFBY9A Assessing and Replacing Natural Resources
- Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund
Section 111 of CERCLA authorizes payments for
costs associated with Federal or State efforts
to restore, rehabilitate, replace or acquire
the equivalent of natural resources damaged as
a result of hazardous substances releases.
D-132
-------
77
Hazardous Waste Site Inventory
SKPY9D Hazardous Waste Site Inventory
This program element provides resources to
support State hazardous waste site activities
including preliminary assessments, Inspections,
responsible party searches, inventory completion,
and collection of additional information to
characterize site problems.
TMOY9A Superfund Support - Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund
The Office of Air provides the Superfund program
with the necessary scientific support and ex-
pertise required under CERCLA to respond to air
contamination at hazardous waste sites.
D-133
-------
78
Management and Support
Program Management - ORD
ADER5A Program Management - Office of Research
and Development/Salaries and Expenses
This program element supports those activities
allocated to the broad managerial functions
that span across specific research and develop-
ment programs. These include overall policy
formulation, program area and strategy planning,
program review, and direction of program
activities. Specifically included are the
Office of the Assistant Administrator for Re-
search and Development, and immediate staff,
the centralized management staff of each pro-
gram office, and the program office directors
and their immediate staffs.
Program Management - OAR
The objectives of this program element are
to develop national policy for air and radiation
programs, to direct the implementation of a
national regulatory program for air and radiation
pollution control; to direct the implementation
of selected aspects of these programs at the
national level, and to provide for coordination
of these programs with other Federal agencies
and State governments. They also include develop-
ment of program-specific guidance for air quality
planning standards, mobile sources air pollution
control, and radiation emissions control.
Activities include liaison and coordination
with executive and legislative branch policy-
makers, the Administrator, Deputy Administrator,
Office Director, Regional Administrators, and
other Assistant Administrators; liaison and
coordination with representatives of national
and international organizations, industry
representatives, and private citizens; management
guidance and assessment of performance of regional
and State/local programs; executive direction
and supervision of Deputy Assistant Administrators
D-134
-------
79
and Staff Office Directors within the Office
of Air and Waste Management; analyses of program
and staff offices, performance, policies and
issues related to OAR's programs; preparation
of OAR's program plan; development of OAR's
budget reouests; analyses and management of
OAR's resources; control of correspondence
with OAR; and provision of administrative
services for the Assistant Administrator.
Program Management - OW
A2UR5A Program Management - Office of Water/Salaries
and Expenses
This program element includes resources for
managerial functions in the Office of Water,
including the Office of the Assistant Admini-
strator and the immediate staff, and the program
office directors and their immediate staffs.
Program management for OW covers policy formulation,
program direction, coordination of OW programs
with other Agencies, State governments, and
industry/interest group organizations, and
other associated management activities within
the immediate office of the Assistant Administrator.
Program Management - OPTS
A2VR5A Program Management - Office of Pesticides and
Toxic Substances/Salaries and Expenses
Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances Program
Management is that part of the toxic substances
and pesticides abatement and control effort
concerned with overall policy formulation,
program direction and evaluation, administrative
operations, resources management, and other
associated management activities.
The major goal of OPTS Program Management is to
ensure tbe implementation of the Agency pesticides
and toxic substances programs. The objectives
are to establish Agency strategy for implement-
ation and integration of the two programs under
applicable Federal statutes and to develop
and manage the programs and policies for assess-
D-135
-------
80
ment and control of pesticides and toxic sub-
stances. This program element includes resource
for managerial functions at the Assistant Admin-
istrator and the Deputy Assistant Administrator,
levels of the Office of Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
Program Management - OSWER
AGLR5A Program Management - Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response - Salaries and Expenses
Program management for OSWER covers policy
formulation, program direction, and the associated
management activities which are performed within
the Office of the Assistant Administrator.
Included are the Assistant Administrator and
the immediate staff, the centralized management
staff, and the program office directors and
their immediate staffs.
Program management activities for the Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response include
developing a national policy and providing
overall direction to ensure implementation of
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Enforcement
Legal Services
A2XT5A Regional Counsel/Salaries and Expenses
This program element includes the functions of
the Office of Regional Counsel which provide
legal advice and assistance to the ten regional
offices.
A2YS5A General Counsel/Salaries and Expenses
This program element includes the functions of
the Office of the General Counsel which provide
legal advice and assistance to the Administrator
and other Agency components.
D-136
-------
81
ALTR5A Program Management - OGC
This program element provides program direction
and management support for the Office of General
Counsel (OGC) and the Office of Management
Operations. The Office of Management Operations
is responsible for the internal program planning,
management and administrative operations for the
OGC and Regional Counsel.
Program Management - OECM
AGKR5A Program Management - Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring - Salaries and Expenses""
This program element includes the Associate
Administrator and immediate staff for Enforcement
and Compliance >fonitoring. This program provides
executive management, as well as program planning,
management analyses, budgeting, financial management,
personnel operations, and administrative support
services.
Building and Facilities
D4.TP4A Repairs and Improvements
N4JP4A Repairs and Improvements
This program element contains resources necessary
to manage a buildings and facilities program,
including maintenance, repairs, alterations and
minor construction projects.
D4KM4A New Facilities
H4KM4A New Facilities
This program element funds the design, construction
and acquisition of new federally owned facilities.
D-137
-------
82
Agency and Regional Management
Policy Direction
A.3DS5A Immediate Office of the Administrator -
Salaries and Expenses
This program element provides the salaries and
expenses of the Administrator, Deputy Admini-
strator, and their immediate staffs. Specific
activities supported include clerical, writing,
trip planning, drivers and messengers, review
and analysis of decision documents, and con-
fidential special assistants.
AJSS5A Office of Management Services -
Salaries and Expenses
This program element provides the salaries and
expenses necessary for centralized administering
budget, and personnel activities in the Office
of the Administrator and the Executive Offices.
AJTS5A Executive Secretariate -
Salaries and Expenses
This program element supports the tracking
functions related to Freedom of Information
requests and executive and Congressional
correspondence directed to the Administrator
and Deputy Administrator.
A3ES5A Administrator's Representation Fund -
Salaries and Expenses
The Representation Fund is used for official
receptions, meetings, and affairs hosted primarily
by the Administrator for domestic and foreign
officials.
D-138
-------
83
A3MS5A Science Advisory Board - Salaries
and Expenses
The Board consists of a Director, professional
and clerical staff, and approximately 50
independent scientists and engineers who advise
the Administrator on the scientific and technical
hases of the Agency's decisions. They review the
scientific basis of regulatory proposals, the
adequacy of Agency research and the research
planning process, the five-year research and
development plan, as well as special requests
from the Administrator, the Deputy Administrator
and the Congress. The SAB prepares findings
and recommendations in technical reports which
are legally required to be sent directly to the
Administrator and to the Congress.
AHES5A Legislative Analysis - Salaries and Expenses
This office serves as the Legislative Counsel
for the Agency. Tn coordination with program officials,
develops legislative initiatives for the Agency,
drafts legislative proposals and obtains clearance of
proposals from the Office of Management and Budget.
Tt prepares and directs the preparation of all testi-
mony to be presented by the Administrator and key
Agency officials before Congress, prepares Agency re-
ports and recommendations on pending and enacted leg-
islation and, represents the Agency in all legislation
related day-to-day contacts with the Congress.
AHGS5A Congressional Liaison - Salaries and Expenses
This office serves as the principal point of
Congressional contact for the Agency. It provides
daily summaries of activities Congressional
to the Administrator, Assistant Administrator
for External Affairs, and other senior policy
officials involved with the development, present-
ation, and implementation of the Agency's
legislative program. The Office reviews all
Congressional correspondence, responds to Congress-
ional requests for information and Agency public-
ations, and coordinates grant and contract
announcements to Congress.
D-139
-------
84
A3HS5A Office of International Activities - Salaries and
Expenses
This office provides guidance and management
for the Agency's international activities and
programs with our border countries, Western
European nations Japan, and the Agency's Scientific
Activities Overseas (SAO) Program. Salaries
and Expenses enable the office to specifically
manage agreements with Canada and Mexico on
cross-boundary environmental issues, oversee
Agency involvement in the activities of International
organizations such as the United Nations Environmental
Program, the World Health Organization, and the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) and formulate and implement Agency policies
that affect the international marine environment.
A1JS5A Office of Civil Rights - Salaries and Expenses
This office manages the Agency's civil rights
programs. It provides policy guidance to the
Administrator and evaluates activities required
to carry out the Agency's responsibilities to
assure equal opportunity and prohibit discri-
mination in employment at EPA. This program
element also supports the area Civil Rights
Directors, who represent the Director regarding
all aspects of civil rights and equal opportunity
programs, at major research and satellite install-
ations in Cincinnati, Research Triangle Park
and Las Vegas. Supports the activities of the
Headquarters Federal Women's Program covering
seminar and workshop costs and other nonpersonnel
costs related to improving the status of women
employed at EPA Headquarters. Provides contract
funds for processing complaints of discrimination
on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age
or national origin lodged by Agency employees and
applicants for employment. These funds are used
for investigations, adjudications, hearings and
Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor training,
as well as awarding attorney fees when the com-
plainant prevails.
D-140
-------
85
AHYS5A Office of Public Affairs - Salaries and Expenses
This office develops Agency policy for media
relations and public Information. Its act-
ivities Include: preparing press releases and
feature material for media distribution; re-
sponding to press inquiries; conducting press
conferences and briefings; coordinating media
appearances of key Agency officials; and com-
piling daily and weekly newsclips of national
press coverage. The office also prepares
publications for the general public on major
Agency programs and activities, produces news-
letters for internal EPA use, supervises the
community relations program to inform citizens
of EPA decisions and actions, provides audiovisual
materials explaining EPA programs, and reviews
all public information materials for conformance
to policy and the Agency's Graphics .Standards Systems.
The office is also responsible for the development
of communications strategies which ensure that
the proper level of visibility is provided to each
Agency issue or major action.
A.3KS5A Office of Federal Activities - Salaries and Expenses
This office develops national policies for
dealing with environmental Issues and problems
associated with Federal agencies. Specifically,
the Office of Federal Activities is responsible
for ensuring that EPA and other Federal agencies
carry out their activities in an environmentally
sound manner pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air
Act.
In this capacity, OFA reviews, files, and publishes
Onotices of all Environmental Impact Statements.
[O^FA also oversees Federal facility compliance
xwith environmental laws and regulations, as
well as with Executive Order 12088. Finally,
OFA manages implementation of the Agency's
Indian policy to provide assistance regarding
pollution control problems on Tribal lands.
D-141
-------
A3NS5A Office of Administrative Law Judges -
Salaries and Expenses
Judges from this office preside over and con-
duct hearings required by the Administrative
Procedures Act related to appeals of Agency
regulations and decisions.
A8RS5A Office of Intergovernmental Liaison
- Salaries and Expenses
This office serves as the Agency's principal
point of contact with major national public
interest groups, environmental groups, industry
groups, and State and local governments. It also
serves to emphasize the Administrator's concern
for effective Interaction and dialog with these
groups and their constituents. It also fosters
cooperation and support for delegating more
responsibility for Agency programs to State and
local governments. To these ends, It assists
State and local officials with their requests
for information, arranges meetings with them, and
encourages involvement in EPA's regulatory process.
ADZS5A Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization - Salaries and Expenses
This office provides Agency-wide oversight in
implementing programs under Sections 8 and 15
of the Small Business Act (as amended) 87
to further the utilization of EPA procurement
and financial assistance programs by small and
disadvantaged businesses. It develops national
policy for EPA and serves as the focal point
for providing guidance for Implementing the
Agency-wide minority and women's business enterprise
policy under grants and cooperative agreements.
A3XT5A Regional Management - Salaries and Expenses
This program element provides the salaries and
expenses to support the Regional Administrators,
D-142
-------
87
Deputy Regional Administrators, and their immediate
staffs, as well as the staff offices which
report directly to them.
ALVS5A Regional Operations
The major objective of this program element is
to assure participation of field components
in the Agency's policy-setting, decision-
making processes, and assessing the impact of
Headquarters actions on Regional operations.
X6ST50 Regional Management Reimbursements
ALSR5A Program Management - Office of External Affairs
This program provides executive management to
the Office of External Affairs (OEA) as well as
oversight, management, planning and budgeting, and
support services to the various OEA staff offices.
These staff offices assist top Agency managers
in representing and communicating the Agency's
programs and policies to the Congress, the public,
other governmental entities, and the media.
Regulatory Information Service Center
AJFS5A Regulatory Information Service Center - Salaries
and Expenses
The Center is responsible for tabulating and
compiling information provided by other Federal
agencies concerning their regulatory efforts.
Financial Management
AGTS5A Financial Management-Salaries and Expenses
HGTS5A Financial Management- Operations, Research
and Facilities
This program element funds the Immediate Office
of Fiscal and Contracts Management and the
Financial Management Division (hqt). The Financial
D-143
-------
Management Division provides the full range of
financial management activities including
payroll accounting, accountability, and developing
policies and procedures. Developing implementing
financial information and reporting systems are
also activities of this program element.
X6LK50 Agency Management Unissued Reimbursables
Planning, Evaluation and Analysis
A3YT5A Planning, Evaluation and Analysis - Salaries
and Expenses
Resources in this program element provide analytic
support to the Regional Administrators to
assure the efficient and effective operation of
EPA Regions. Support activities include Regional
planning, budgeting and management and reviews
of regulations from the Regional perspective.
Office of the Comptroller
AGUS5A Office of the Comptroller - Salaries and
Expenses
HGUS5A Office of the Comptroller - Operations, Research
and Facilities
This office develops and operates the EPA's
program planning and budgeting system; analyzes
and prepares Agency budgets for submission to
the Congress and OMB; and maintains the Agency's
allocation, control, and review system for all
workyear and financial resources.
Financial Management
A3ZT5A Financial Management (Regions) - Salaries and
Expenses
This program element provides for the Regional
offices' financial management, payroll, and
accounting activities.
D-144
-------
89
Integrated Environmental Management Program
AHBS5A Integrated Environmental Management Program
- Salaries and Expenses
This program element provides resources to
develop an analytic framework for integrating
the toxics and conventional pollutant activities
of EPA's ma.lor programs.
Policy Management
AHCS5A Office of Policy Analysis
- Salaries and Expenses
This program element contains resources to
analyze all EPA regulations, policies and programs
from the perspective of their economic and
environmental impacts and benefits.
AHPS5A Office of Standards and Regulations
- Salaries and Expenses
Activities In this program element include
management of the Agency's regulation deve-
lopment and review process, design of the Agency's
regulatory reform activities, and development
of innovative approaches to regulation.
AHPS5A Office of Management Systems and Evaluation
The principal goal of the Office of Management
Systems and Evaluation (OMSE) is to develop,
operate, and maintain planning, evaluation,
accountability, and management systems for the
Administrator to improve overall Agency program
management effectiveness.
Support Services
A4CK5A Nationwide Support Services
H%CX5A Nationwide Support Services
J4CX5A Nationwide Support Services
K4CX5A Nationwide Support Services
D-145
-------
90
This program element provides nationwide services
to all Agency program regardless of location.
The following services are supported by this
program: Agencywide costs for facility rentals
(including Standard Level User Charges (SLUG) '
and direct leases), payments to the U.S. Postal
Service, Federal Telecommunications System (FTS),
nationwide protective services, reimbursements to
the Federal Workers Compensation Fund (BEC),
payments to the Public Health Service (PHS) for
commissioned officers assigned to EPA, payment
of unemployment compensation bills, and contracts
and Intergovernmental Agreements (TAGs) which
support the Agency's health and safety program,
as well as finance system.
A4DX5A Headquarters Support Services
This program provides high quality and efficient
office, building and information management
services to EPA operations in Washington, D.C.,
Research Triangle Park (RTP), North Carolina
and Cincinnati, Ohio, and to do so in a cost
effective manner. The following services are
supported by this program: office services,
building services and information management.
A4EX5A Regional Support Services
This program element includes local support
costs such as utilities, telephone equipment
and service costs, and minicomputer operations
for the Regional offices.
Lab Support Services
AAGX5A Lab Support - Air and Radiation
This program element includes funds for basic
facilities and maintenance costs to support
the Motor Vehicle Emissions Laboratory, the
Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility, and
the Las Vegas facility.
D-146
-------
91
Lab Support Services
AHAX5A Lab Support - Pesticides & Toxic Substances
This program element funds rent and utilities
costs, basic facilities operations and maintenance
costs for all Agency locations, including EPA
laboratories, field installations, and regional/
headquarter offices. These resources provide
basic services such as supplies and equipment,
printing, employee health units, library services
and information management.
Management Systems and Evaluation
AHFS5A Management Systems and Evaluation - Salaries
and Expenses
Resources in this program element support the
effort to operate the Agency's accountability
system, Implement necessary management reforms,
and evaluate program effectiveness.
Office of Inspector General
A.3AS5A Office of Inspector General - Salaries and
Expenses
This office, is responsible for: conducting,
supervising and coordinating audits and investig-
ations relating to EPA programs and operations;
promoting economy and effectiveness in the
administration of EPA programs; preventing and
detecting fraud and abuse in EPA programs and
operations; keeping the Administrator and
Congress fully informed about problem areas and
related corrective actions; and review of EPA
regulations and legislation.
A4EX5A Regional Support Services - Salaries and Expenses
This program element includes Local support
costs such as utilities, telephone equipment
and service costs, and minicomputer operations
for the Regional offices.
D-147
-------
92
Program Management - OARM
AGSS5A Program Management - Office of Administration and
Resources Management - Salaries and Expenses
This program element funds the Assistant Admin-
istrator's Immediate Office which provides
overall guidance to the Office of Administration
oversees service delivery, and performs all of
the budgeting and resource management activities
within OA.
Program Management - OPPE
AGRS5A Program Management Policy, Policy
and Evaluation - Salaries and Expenses
This program element supports the Assistant
Administrator's Immediate Office and provides
policy direction, planning functions, and the
budgeting and resource management activities
within OPPE.
Personnel and Organization Services
A30S5A Personnel and Organization Services - Salaries
and Expenses
This program element funds the Office of Personnel
and Organization (OPO) at HO, as well as the
personnel offices at Cincinnati and RTP. In
addition to the Immediate Office of the Director
of OPO, this program element funds the Personnel
Management Division at headquarters, Cincinnati,
RTP and Las Vegas; the management and Organization
Division; and the Occupational Health and Safety
Staff. These units provide agencywide personnel
policy and guidance, and general personnel
services at all EPA locations, except the regional
offices. The Management and Organization
Division provides organizational analysis and
consulting services to senior program officials
concerning internal management and organizational
issues. The Occupational Health and Safety
Staff develops agencywide health and safety
policies and programs and provides technical
assistance on these matters.
D-148
-------
93
A4AT5A Personnel Management (Regions) - Salarj.es and Expenses
This program element provides resources to
provide personnel management services and workforce
planning and analysis for regional managers, to
provide assistance to regional employees, and
to represent the Agency with employee unions.
Regional personnel offices also provide basic
personnel services: staffing/classification,
payroll/personnel processing, and training.
AMKS5A Office of Human Resources Management
This program.element supports the activities of
the Office of Human Resources Management (OHRM).
OHRM will seek to develop systems to be used in
analyzing the EPA workforce, create career
development programs for EPA employees, improve
services and developmental opportunities for
Agency executives, provide workforce planning
and management guidance to help EPA anticipate
its hiring needs, provide strategies and programs
for organizational development, and evaluate
the effectiveness of Agency human resources
management efforts.
Contracts and Grants Management
A3RS5A Contracts and Grants Management - Salaries and
This program element covers the salaries and
expenses of the Procurement and Contracts
Management Division (hqt) the contracts management
staff located at RTP and Cincinnati, and the
Grants Administration Division (hqt). Con-
tracts functions include developing agency wide
procurement procedures, conducting the minority
and small business program related to direct
EPA procurements, and providing technical assist-
ance and reviews of field procurement activities.
This element also provides centralized pro-
curement services for all Agency contracts, as
well as small purchase services at headquarters,
RTP and Cincinnati.
D-149
-------
94
The Grants Administration Division develops
policy and regulations for all EPA grants,
maintains the Grants Information and Control
System (GIGS) for all grant applications and
active grants, awards all headquarters' grants,
monitors and evaluates EPA grant activities,
recommends system improvements, and provides
grants management training and assistance to
regional grants personnel and program offices.
Facilities and Management Services
A3VS5A Facilities and Management Services - Salaries
and.Expenses
This program element covers the salaries and
expenses of the Immediate Office of, the Immediate
Office of the Directors of Administration at Cincinnati
and RTP, the Facilities and Support Service Division,
and Facilities Management and Services Division,
located in Cincinnati and the General Services
Division located in RTP. This staff administrators
the agency's buildings and facilities programs;
provides direct administrative support, audio-
visual production and equipment, property and
supply management, printing and reproduction,
communications, and security services to EPA
hqt, Cincinnati and RTP. The staff also provides
long-range agencywide planning and direction
for space acquisition and energy conservation.
The Director manages the Facilities and Supoort
Services Division, the Management Information
and Data Systems Division and the Library Systems
Staff. The Directors of Administration at
Cincinnati and RTP administer all Office of
Administration activities, Including personnel,
contracts, facilities and libraries, at their
respective locations.
Information Systems and Services
A3WS5A Information Systems and Services - Salaries
and Expenses
This program element funds the Office of Inform-
ation Resources Management, the ADP Staff at
D-150
-------
95
Cincinnati, and the library staffs at headquarters,
Cincinnati and RTF. OIRM and the ADP staff at
Cincinnati support activities at EPA's central
data center facility and maintain certain agency-
wide data systems. OIRM provides technical
assistance and coordinates system design to
minimize duplicative systems and assure the
integration of similar systems. The library
staffs provide basic loan and reference services,
catalog library holdings, and respond to requests
for environmental liter
A4BT5A Regional Administrative Management - Salaries
and Expenses
This program element covers the salaries and
expenses necessary to provide regional administrative
services, including procurement, ADPservlces, space
and facilities management, office services, security,
occupational health and safety, motor pool operations,
and property management.
D-151
-------
96
Interdisciplinary
Research and Development
HI09 Intermedia Non-Energy
ACHHIA Exploratory Research Core Program - Salaries
and Expenses
CCHHIA Exploratory Research Core Program - Research
and Development
KCH^TA Exploratory Research Core Program - Research
and Development
The objectives of the Exploratory Research Core
Program are to: (1) identify and assess long-terra
scientific trends, problems and opportunities;
(2) develop defensible methods to improve the
Agency's ability to perform cost-benefit analyses
of major regulations; and (3) manage an Ex-
ploratory Research Competitive Grants and
Centers of Excellence program, designed to fill
in gaps in the Agency's science and engineering
knowledge base. The Exploratory Research Core
Program also promotes the participation of minority
institutions in the Competitive Grants program
and manages the National Environmental Workforce
program.
AJXH1A Technical Information and Liaison
- Salaries and Expenses
CJXH1A Technical Information and Liaison
- Research and Development
This program has two major components: management
of technical information products by the Center
for Environmental Research Information (CERI),
and dissemination of technical information and
technology to states and localities. CERI
has responsibility for tracking, reviewing,
processing and distributing ORD project summaries
and reports, responding to inquiries, and producing
the Congressionally mandated Research Outlook.
CERI also produces seminars and publications to
help state and local officials meet regulatory
requirements under federal Air, Water, and Hazardous
Waste laws.
D-152
-------
97
ALKH1A Quality Assurance Management - Salaries and Expenses
CLKH1A Quality Assurance Management - Research and Development
The goal of this program is to develop and
implement the policy and technical guidance
required for an effective and efficient agency-
wide quality assurance program. Activities
include development of agency-wide quality
assurance policy, audits of data sets, and
reports to the Administrator on the quality of
Agency data and the status of quality assurance
efforts across media and programs.
AT.LH1A Scientific Assessment Interdisciplinary
- Salaries and Expenses
CLLH1A Scientific Assessment Interdisciplinary
- Research and Development
This program has the primary goal of providing
uniform Agency-wide guidance on consistency of
exposure and risk assessments. Broad guidelines
are developed to address concerns affecting all
media and ensure uniform assessment procedures
are hased on sound scientific principles and
information. Coordination with other Federal
agencies on risk assessment procedures and
developments is also provided.
D-153
-------
Abatement Control and Compliance
H210 Federal Agencies Compliance
AIPH2A Federal Agencies Compliance Review - Salaries
and Expenses
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act require
EPA to review and comment on EISs and on the
environmental Impact of any major legislation,
regulations or other actions proposed by other
Federal agencies. The program strives to resolve
interagency environmental controversies through:
(1) effective liaison with other Federal agencies,
(2) early identification of significant environ-
mental issues, and (3) timely review of and
comment on major actions. In addition, under
Executive Order 12088 and OMB Circular A-106,
resources in this program assist Federal agencies
in identifying and assisting facilities needing
pollution control mechanisms to comply with
environmental laws and regulations.
AKKH2A NEPA Compliance - Salaries and Expenses
BKKH2A NEPA Compliance - Abatement, Control and
Compliance
JKKH2A NEPA Compliance - Abatement, Control and
Compliance Carrryover
Under Section 511(c)(l) of the Clean Water Act,
EPA is responsible for assessing the potential
environmental impacts of municipal wastewater
treatment grant projects and of new source
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permits in those states where the permits
program has not been delegated. The assessment
takes the form of an EIS or, alternatively, a
finding of no significant impact (FNSI).
D-154
-------
99
H230 Accelerated Review and Permitting
J8DH2B Accelerated Review and Permitting
This program element consists of resources
for the accelerated review and permitting
program. It is intended to expedite develop-
ment of energy-related and other important
projects in an environmentally sound manner.
It augments the resources of EPA's permitting,
environmental impact statement EIS) review,
and EIS preparation offices with guidance from
the Office of Federal Activities, this program
accelerates permitting of such activities as waste
disposal siting, the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System, Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, and underground injection.
As a cooperating agency, EPA also assists other
Federal agencies in the preparation of EISs for
projects requiring EPA permits. Although
originally intended only for energy development
projects, the program now extends to other
major development projects as well.
H999 Interdisciplinary
X6FH20 Disaster Assistance
X6GH20 Interdisciplinary - Reimbursables
D-155
-------
100
Enforcement
H305 Technical Support - Office of Enforcement and Compliance
Monitoring
AFNH3A Technical Support - Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring - Salaries and Expenses
BFNH3A Technical Support - Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring - Abatement, Control and Compliance
JFNH3A Technical Support - Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring - Abatement, Control and Compliance
- Carryover
This program includes the planning, development,
and provision of technical evidence, information,
and interpretations for civil and criminal case
preparations involving generation, transport,
and disposal of toxic and hazardous waste as
related to the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Toxic substances
Control Act (TSCA); compliance requirements as
related to the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) and other water
pollution control legislation; existing source,
new source, and hazardous emissions standards as
related to the Clean Air Act; pesticide enforce-
ment and regulatory procedures related to the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA); and regulatory aspects of other
environmental legislation and executive orders,
as well as appropriate provisions of Title 18 of
the U.S. Code. Tn addition, this program
provides management of the criminal investigations
program, as well as management of evidence
audit and evidence preservation activities.
D-156
-------
101
H373 Enforcement Policy and Operations
AJAH3A Enforcement Policy and Operations - Salaries
and Expenses
BJAH3A Enforcement Policy and Operations - Abatement
Control and Compliance
This program comprises the legal aspects of all
Agency enforcement programs regardless of media
(with the exception of Superfund). Tt is responsible
for providing legal direction and support to
the enforcement of the Clean Air Act; the
Clean Water Act; the Toxic Substances Control
Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act; the Safe.Drinking Water Act; and the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
The resources provide for the development of
legal enforcement policy and procedures to
direct the legal enforcement and compliance
activities of the Agency including the initiation
and conduct of civil/ criminal litigation as
appropriate. Full legal enforcement support
services are provided to media compliance
programs in accordance with specific media
priorities and compliance monitoring activities.
Activities of this program are coordinated with
General and Regional Counsel staff attorneys to
assure consistent interpretation and application
of the law. Litigation activities are conducted
in cooperation with the Department of Justice.
Technical support is provided by the National
Enforcement Tnvestigations Center in Denver,
Colorado and individual media and regional
offices. States are encouraged to resolve
compliance problems whenever possible with
Agency assistance as appropriate.
D-157
-------
APPENDIX E
-------
APPENDIX E
INDEX OF PLANNING AND ACCOUNTING REPORTS
-------
APPENDIX E.I
INDEX OF PLANNING REPORTS
ALLOWANCE HOLDER REPORTS
Report
Number
A-2
A-fi
N-7
Title
Approved Operating Plan by
Allowance Holders and Object
Class.
Approved Operating Plan by
Allowance Holders.
Total Resources issued by
National Program Managers
and program elements
Description
Approved quarterly operating plan by
Allowance Holder/Appropriation/Media/
Program Element. This is also sent
out as attachment to the advice of
allowance document.
Approved quarterly operating plan by
Allowance Holder/Appropriation/Media/
Program Element. This is also sent
out as attachment to the advice of
allowance document.
Current total resources by National
program manager and program
element.
Frequency
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.2
INDEX OF PLANNING REPORTS
ALLOWANCE HOLDER REPORTS
Report
Number
Title
Allowance
'Cover Form'
Advice of Allowance
Allowance
Explanation of
changes
Explanation of changes to the
Advice of Allowances
Description
Allowance document signed by Budget
Director to authorize allowance .holders
to spend funds. The form includes current
quarterly distribution of operating plan
resources (FTE and total $) by Appropriation.
Allowance Holder, and media with net increase/
from previons month allowance. This document
is usually sent out with two more detail
reports: (1) 'Explanations of changes to
the advice of allowances' and (2) A-6 report
This attachment is usually sent out with each
advice of allowance documenting all the
approved changes made to the specific allowance
during the current month. The attachment also
includes narrative (1-10 lines) descriptions
of the change requests.
Frequency
Monthly
(when changes
occurs)
Monthly
(when changes
occurs)
-------
APPENDIX ^.
INDEX OF PLANNING REPORTS
ALLOWANCE HOLDER REPORTS
Report
Number
A-6
(allowance)
Title
Approved Operating Plan by
Allowance Holders
Additional reports
U>
AHM-1
Money Available by Suballow-
ance
Description
This report is usually -sent out with each
allowance package. The report reflects the
latest operating plan (quarterly) by allowance
holder, appropriation, media, and program
element.
Additional reports for the various stages of
the operating plan and the budget process may
be easily produced through RMIS1 report
generator system - Budget Analysis Resource
System (BARS)
A monthly report for the allowance
holder that shows available balances
for each responsibility center. The
"Quarterly Allowance Column" reflects
the allowance as issued by the Office
of Resources Management. The "Cumul-
ative Quarterly Authorization Column"
is the amount of the suballocation made
by the allowance holder to the responsi-
bility center (RC).
Frequency
Monthly
(when changes
occur)
As needed
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.4
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
ALLOWANCE HOLDER REPORTS
Report
Number
AHM-2
AHM-3
AHM-4
AHM-5
Title
Money used for Authorized
Work
Money used by Organization
Group
Account Number Code Book
Account Number Report by
Object Class
Description
A monthly report for the allowance
holder reflecting program element data
for each allowance. The "Memo"
Column reflects the allowance as issued
by the Budget Operations Division (BOD)
on a monthly basis. The "Annual Money
Authorized" Column shows the funds as
issued by the Allowance Holder.
A monthly report reflecting the money
used by special class categories for
each responsibility center.
Account number listing within allowance
This report reflects object class data
for each account number used by the
allowance holder. The data is further
shown at the program element level with-
in each allowance.
Frequency
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.5
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
ALLOWANCE HOLDER REPORTS
Report
Number
AHM-6
Title
AHM-7
Project Payroll Charges
and Work hours
Money used by Program
Area- AH
PI
Ul
PAYCOM-1
Estimate of Payroll Commit-
ments
Description
This report reflects payroll charges and
workhours by account number for each
responsibility center. The data origi-
nates from the payroll subsystems.
This report shows program element and
object class category data for each allow-
ance. Totals are shown at program element,
media and allowance levels, with object
class category summaries at the media and
allowance levels. Percentages are derived by
dividing the approved operating plan and the
allowance issue into the money used (open
commitments plus total obligations).
This report is the estimate of quarterly
payroll commitments initially produced
by the Financial Management Division and
entered into the accounting system.
Frequency
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.6
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
EPA MANAGEMENT REPORTS
Report
Number
EPA-1
Title
w
EPA-2
EPA-3A
EPA-3B
EPA-4
EPA-5
Description
Money Available by
Appropriation
Money Available by Allowance
Money Available by Allowance
Holder/Allowance (NOA and
carryover appropriations)
Money Available by Allowance
Holder/Allowance
Money Available by
Appropriation-Current Year
Status of Appropriation-
Prior Year
Agency level report reflecting the status
of money available for each appropriation
and source of fund. The report is used
by DFM and BOD, and fulfills legally
prescribed requirements related to the
Department of Treasury and OMB reporting.
Agency level report reflecting money
available by allowance in support of
higher level appropriation reports.
Agency level report showing available
by allowance for each allowance holder.
The report has only "NOA" and carryover
appropriations.
Agency level report showing money
available by allowance for each allowance
for each allowance holder. The report
has only construction grant obligations
against funds from other agencies.
This is a monthly agency level report
reflecting money available for each
"NOA" and carryover appropriation.
Agency level report reflecting recoveries
and/or overruns for prior year
appropriations
Frequency
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.7
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
EPA MANAGEMENT REPORTS
Report
Number
EPA-5A
EPA-6
EPA-7
Title
M
-vj
EPA-8
EPA-9A
Prior Recoveries/Overruns (-)
National Program Summary
Status of Program Budget
Description
Status of Appropriation by
Media
Program Element by Object
Class
Agency level report reflecting recoveries
and overruns for each obligation document
unpaid as of September 30, 19 .
Agency level report reflecting program
element data for each national program
manager (NPM).
A monthly report used primarily by the
Budget Operations Division. This report
shows available balance of the program
element and budget subactivity in support
of budget activity data.
Agency level report used by BOD. The
report reflects funds used and available
balance by media. Totals are shown at
allowance level in support of the media.
Special agency level report reflecting
selected program element data by object
class. Report is used by the Budget
Operations Division.
Frequency
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
-------
APPENDIX F..8
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
EPA MANAGEMENT REPORTS
oo
Report
Number
EPA-10
EPA-11
EPA-12
EPA-13A
Title
EPA-13B
FMO Account Number Code
Agency General Ledger
Obligations by Special
Object Class Categories
Status of Allowance by
Program Element and Media
Status of Allowance by
Program Element and Media
Description
Lists all active account numbers in the
Financial Management Division Accounting
System.
Agency general ledger report reflecting the
balance of each general ledger account
within the appropriation.
A special agency level report reflecting
certain object class categories by
allowance.
A report used by the Reports and Analysis
Branch which reflects the quarterly and
annual advice of allowance for all funds
other than NOA and carryover by allowance.
A report used by the Reports and Analysis
Branch which reflects the quarterly and
annual advice of allowance for all funds
other than NOA and carryover by allowance.
Frequency
Monthly
. Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.9
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
EPA MANAGEMENT REPORTS
Report
Number
EPA-15
EPA-16
FTE-8
FTE-10
RCW-1
Title
Cumulative Payroll
Distribution and Work hours
Section of Law by Program
Element
Fulltime Equivalency
FTE Employee Report
Transactions to be Verified
Description
This is a special payroll report
reflecting payroll disbursements and work
hours within each program element.
A special agency level report used by
BOD which reflects the section of law
applicable to each program element within
an appropriation.
This is a monthly report reflecting
FTE hours for permanent and other
than permanent full time personnel.
This is a monthly report reflecting
cost by employee, allowance holder
and by program element.
A report that lists all actions process-
ed by the FMO since the last.report. The
purpose of the report is to provide
feedback to the RC regarding input and
acceptance of commitments and obligations
submitted to the FMO.
Frequency
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Weekly
-------
APPENDIX E.10
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
RESPONSIBILITY CENTERS REPORTS
Report
Number
RCW-2
Title
Money Available by
Suballowance
I
f—
o
RCB-3A
RCM-4
Payroll Distribution
Document Control Register
Description
Shows available balance of money for each
suballowance. The purpose of the report
is to show the RC how much money is
available for spending according to the
official accounting records. The cumu-
lative quarterly authorization is the sub-
allowance issued by the allowance holder
on a quarterly basis for input by servicing
finance office.
Bi-weekly payroll distribution report by
employee within responsibility center
Summarizes the status of cash document
control number and indicates all of the
net changes in the available money balance
during the month. The purpose of the
report is to enable the RC to compare
this information with corresponding
figures kept on his/her document control
register.
Frequency
Weekly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.ll
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
RESPONSIBILITY CENTERS REPORTS
Report
Number
RCM-5
Title
Money Used for Authorized
Work
RCM-7
RCM-8
Employee Payroll Charges
and Workhours by Project
Account Number Report by
Object Class
Description
A monthly report that provides monitoring
of authorized work levels of the responsi-
bility center. The purpose of the report
is to show how much money has been used
in summary at project, program element,
and media for each sub-allowance. The
annual money authorized is the work plan
issued by the allowance holder for input
by the servicing finance office. Percent-
ages are arrived at by dividing the annual
money authorized into the money.used (open
commitments plus total obligations) for
the year to date and the current month.
This report lists employee payroll charges
and workhours by project (account number).
This report reflects subject class data
and account number level within each
allowance responsibility center. The
report is used by the RC and allowance
holder to review costs at the account
number and object class level.
Frequency
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX E.I2
INDEX OF ACCOUNTING REPORTS
RESPONSIBILITY CENTERS REPORTS
Report
Number
RCM-9
Title
Outstanding Travel Advances
for the RC
Description
I
I—•
K>
This report lists outstanding travel
advance balances by AH/RC. It displays
an individual's outstanding advance
regardless of which SFO issued the
advance. It is important to understand
that all mismatched items (SSN) will
not appear on this report. Therefore,
the outstanding balances reflected on
this report may not be accurate.
Frequency
Monthly
-------
APPENDIX F
-------
APPENDIX F
LISTING OF RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual 2400
2/1/85
APPENDIX F
LISTING OF RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
A. The Memo Accompanying First Advice of Allowance for FY85 Describing
Limitations on the Obligation of Funds. The entire memo is included in
this section.
b. The Memo Containing the Cross walk between FMS and PMIS codes. In
Attachment B, the memo contains allowable codes for each appropriation.
The memo is included in this section.
C. Agency Guidance for FY85-86
D. "Goals, Objectives Commitments and Measures" for FY84
E. Manual of the Federal Budget: Prepared by Congressional Research Service
F. Administrative Systems Technical Overview (Draft 5/23/84)
Resources Management Information Systems/Financial Management System
G. The 1980 EPA Planning and Budget Manual
H. The Office of the Comptroller maintains a library of call letters and other
budget process documentation. Of special significance were the three
binders documenting the FY83 budget process.
I. A primary source of information for this manual was the "Analysis of the
EPA Budget Process", prepared by the National Academy of Public Adminis-
tration (NAPA). Their bibliography is included at the end of this section.
-------
MEMO ACCOMPANYING FIRST
ADVICE OF ALLOWANCE
DESCRIBING LIMITATIONS ON THE OBLIGATION OF FUNDS
-------
T.-£7 * UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
2 1 1984
/T • OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATION
AND RESOURCES
_ MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: FY 1985 Advicest-o^ Allow/nce
/ '
FROM: David P. Ryan. / /
Director, BudgfetJ?^Isio
TO: Allowance Holders
With this memorandum, I am issuing the initial FY 1985 Advices of
Allowance to begin the new fiscal year. Each Advice will include an
explanation for any change to your resources since you made your Phase III
quarterly distribution and a listing by program of your Operating Plan
resources.
In addition, I would like to review the process we used to apply the
FY 1985 Appropriations Act to your Operating Plans. Finally, I'd like to
highlight Congressional guidance and limitations contained in the Act.
IMPACT OF FY 1985 APPROPRIATIONS ACT
The HUD-Independent Agencies Appropriations Act of 1985 (P.L. 98-371)
provided EPA with an additional 278 workyears and $79,521,000 above its
original 1985 request. Congress included guidance which, in some cases,
designated specific uses and, in other cases, granted the Administrator
discretion to satisfy Agency priorities.
Coupled with the need to meet Congressional priorities, we have
recognized the need to meet several new demands such as development of
acid rain and groundwater initiatives, and initiate reactions to the problem
of leaking underground storage tanks. These areas have grown in importance
since EPA presented its budget to Congress in January.
Your Phase III Operating Plan Incorporated both the Congressional and
Agency initiatives, placing in reserve the reprogrammings and impacts of
funding for EDB and $4.3 million in Abatement, Control, and Compliance
initiatives. In the likely event that Congress denies the EDB reprogramraing,
the $7.0 million will be issued from reserve in a later Advice of Allowance.
We submitted our 1985 Operating Plan for review to OMB and received their
approval and an apportionment of funds in September. As a reminder of the
aajor changes to the Operating Plan made by those actions, Attachment A
summarizes these workyear and dollar distributions of the Add-on.
F-l
-------
CONGRESSIONAL LIMITATIONS WITHIN APPROPRIATIONS
Congress specifically included a number of limitations in our FY 1985
Appropriations Act (P.L. 98-371). In August, your Senior Managers received
a detailed analysis of the final Congressional action on our FY 1985 Act.
It provided a summary of items specifically noted in the Public Law, and
then summarized the House, Senate and Conference Reports. I would like to
specifically call to your attention four limitations in our Bill which are
still in effect.
(1) Reprograimning in Excess of S500,GCO
As in FY 1984, we have reprogramming limitations. In FY 1985, however,
the Senate has increased EPA's limitation from 5250,000 to 31 million. The
House requires advance approval of reprogranunings in excess of 5500 thousand,
and, therefore, we will operate under the House language this fiscal year.
We have forwarded a package to the Committees which included reprogram-
mings, restructurings, and reorganizations made during development of the
Operating Plan that apply under these limitations. Until we receive approval
from the Committees, these changes will not be included in your plan.
Resources involved in these actions are in reserve pending approval and
issuance.
(2) Personnel, Compensation and Benefits Reprogrammings
Section 409 of cur FY 1985 Appropriations Act (P.L. 98-371) states that
no part of any appropriation for Personnel, Compensation and Benefits may be
used for any other object class without committee approval. This limitation
establishes a floor on PCiB for the Agency. You may, with our approval,
move funds into PC&3. Requests to move funds out of this object class require
our approval as well.
(3) Superfund Administrative Expense Ceiling
Since FY 1932, our appropriation bills have, included a limitation on
administrative expenses in tha Superfur.d Appropriation. This ceiling coders
obligations for PC53 , travel, transportation of things, rent, communications
and utilities, printing, supplies and materials, insurance, ~nd equipment.
In FY 1385, Congress has established an Administrative Expense Ceiling for
Superfund of 587,573,000.
In FY 1935, we will again be managing this limitation through the issuance
of an Administrative Expense Ceiling to each Program and Regional Office.
Details on these callings and our process tc manage these Agency-vide are in-
cluded in Attachment 3. Ail resources in Administrative object classes in
your initial Operating Plan utilize your currant administrative ceiling.
Most importantly, you should ensure that you maintain obligations within your
ceiling. If your projected needs are in excess of your ceiling, you should
request, far in advance of any need, additional ceiling from the Budget Divisio:
We will analyze your needs and determine if there is sufficient ceiling avail-
able elsewhere in the Agency to cover your request. In no case should you
assume increased ceilir.g without prior approval of
F-2
-------
(4) Superfund Site-Related Travel
• As many of you know, managing within a travel ceiling in the Superfund
program has been quite difficult. The Congressional Committees recognize
the difficulty in this area and in EPA's 1985 Appropriation Act they again
included a provision that excluded site-related travel' from the travel ceil-
ing limitations in Section 401. You should understand, however, that al-
though site-related travel is excluded from a travel ceiling, the Agency
must manage site-related travel within the larger Administrative Expense
Ceiling. The Superfund travel ceiling included in this memorandum covers non-
site related travel. Please refer to Revised Policy and Procedure Memorandum
#10K which includes Superfund Travel Charging Policies.
Please keep in mind that you are each responsible for ensuring full
compliance with all Congressional limits; those in the statute, in the
Conference Report, and in each Committee's Report.
FY 1985 RESOURCE CEILING
The Agency must operate under OMB and Congressionally mandated resource
ceilings. Congress, of course, sets our travel ceilings in Section 401 of
the Appropriations Act. A summary of your travel ceilings for each appropri-
ation is included in Attachment C.
Although Congress appropriates dollars, 0KB issues workyear ceilings.
This year we will again be giving you the flexibility to manage your workyear
ceiling on a total workyear basis as well. Again, if you intend to convert
employees from an other-than-permanent status to a permanent status, you
must recognize that you will have to be able to fund the potential increased
costs of permanent employees from your existing Salaries and Expenses and
Superfund Allowances, In Superfund, you should also consider the additional
costs of conversion within the constraints of your Administrative Expense
Ceiling. We cannot provide any PC&3 relief for increased costs associated
with expanded use of permanent workyears.
A PC&B floor was established in order to accommodate the Agency's
expected salary needs in FY 1985. The floor reflects the full PC&B cost of
your FY 1985 FTE ceiling. If during the year it appears that this figure.
is too high, we will consider requests for moving PC&B resources to expenses.
Keep in mind the richening need which was brought to your attention during
Phase III. We will not provide funds to cover these expected costs. You,
therefore, will have to manage within your existing Salaries and Expenses
resources if these costs materialize. At the end of each quarter, we will
assess your costs per FTE, and if there is growth, we will request that
you move sufficient funds into PC&3 from your oim expense base to cover
these costs.
All resource ceilings in this memorandum apply to FY 1985 Appropriations.
You should take care not to incur workyear, PC&B, travel or other intramural
costs against. carryover funds'without prior approval from the. Budget Division.
F-3
-------
FUNDING FOR BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES ACTIVITIES
• As in the past few years, the justification of our FY 1985 President's
Budget for Buildings and Facilities specifically noted that funding for
repair and improvement projects under $20,000 was not included in the
Buildings and Facilities1 appropriation. Our Policy and Procedure Memorandum
#16-B, dated January 16, 1984, outlines a process of advance notification
and approval of these types of projects. The instructions and guidance
for that process remain unchanged.
In accordance with the Office of General Counsel recommendations, we
plan to work with the Committees to try and get specific language in the
Appropriation Act for 1986 that, would preclude further debate over whether
our current policy is in compliance with established statutes.
Shortly, we expect to issue a revision to the above Policy and Procedure
Memorandum that will include the changes necessary as a result of final-
action on our 1985 appropriation. These changes will revise the limit on
repair and improvement projects from $250,000 to $500,000 without the Com-
mittees' approval, and inclusion of bill language requiring the Committees'
approval of all new construction projects.
REGIONAL GUIDANCE FOR SUPERFUND AND GRANTS
The Superfund extramural dollar distribution received by the Regions in
the October 1, 1984 Advice of Allowance is a distribution which will allow
normal operational needs to be met until mid-year. It does not reflect
the full amount of extramural dollars you will receive. A final distribution
will be provided as soon as the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
(OSWER) completes the SCAP process.
Based on recent findings by the Office of Inspector General concerning
States' adherence to the level of effort requirements under the Clean Water
Act Sections 106 and 205(g) grants, no Section 106 or 205(g) grant awards
should be made until the Regional Administrator has ascertained that these
requirements will be met for all States receiving grants in FY 1985.
CARRYOVER ISSUANCE
Requests for carryover funds for the Operating and Superfund prograpjs
are due in my office on November 2. Policy and Procedure Memorandum .:'.-'4-1
provides the necessary guidance for this submission. We will analyze thesa
requests and hope to begin issuing carryover with the December Allowances.
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (RMIS) INITIATIVE
At mid-year, a survey of Senior Budget Offices and Regional Management
Division Directors was taken to determine interest in automated features we
are offering through RMIS and to determine what computer equipment was
available in your office. The features included:
Terminal Data Entry
Data Editing
Electronic Transfer of Data
Report Generator Capability
F-4
-------
The response to the survey was extremely positive and we intend to pro-
ceed with this expansion of features in FY 1985. Our plan is to bring one
Headquarters RPIO or Region on line at a time, to the fullest extent possible,
and move on when each office is functioning smoothly. Your office will be
kept abreast of the progress -and scheduling of this effort as the year pro-
gresses. • •
OPERATING PLAN CHANGE REQUEST PROCESS
In Attachment D, I have outlined in more detail our present change request
process with reference to submission requirements and due dates for the
submission of monthly changes to the FY 1985 Operating Plan. In FY 1985, all
reprogramming requests should be addressed to the Director, Budget Division
(PM-225), Attention: Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch.
If you have questions or comments on any of the above, please contact
Rick Peterson at 382-4212.
Attachments
cc: Howard Messner
Seymour Greenstone
C. Morgan Kinghorn
Clarence Mahan
See Attached Listing
F-5
-------
ADDRESSEES:
Executive Officer, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Associate Administrator for International Activities (A-106)
Associate Administrator for Regional Operations (A-101)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-1J.O)
Director, Office of Civil Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Audit (A-109)
Director, Office of Investigations (A-109)
Director, Office of Management and Technical Assessment (A-109)
Assistant Administrator for External Affairs (A-100)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Congressional Liaison (A-103)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)
Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources Management (PM-208)
Comptroller (PM-225)
Director, Budget 'Division (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Planning and Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Air, Radiation, Enforcement and Management Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Research and Development Rrnnch (PM-225)
Chief, Water, Pesticides and Toxics Substances Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund/RCRA Branch (PM-225)
Director,_Flnanclal Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Reports and Analysis Branch (PM-226)
Director, Office of Administration (PM-217)
Direc'or, Personnel Management Division (PM-208)
Director, Management and Organization Division (PM-213)
Director, Facilities and Support Services Division (PM-215)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Revlcv and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Office of Information Resources Management (PM-211)
Director, Office of Budget and Control (PM-208)
Director, Office of Human Resources Management (PM-224)
Assistant Administrator for Policy, Planning and Evaluation (PM-219)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Director, Program Evaluation Division (PM-222)
F-6
-------
-2-
Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office of General Counsel (LE-130)
Assistant Administrator for Water (WH-556) •
Director, Office of Water Enforcement and Permits (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Programs Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (VH-546)
Director, Office of Groundwater Protection (WH-550)
Director, Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (WH-550)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339)
Director, Office of Mobile Sources (ANR-445)
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C)
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (ANR-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-78S)
Director, Office of Toxics Intergration (TS-777)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Office of Research Program Management (RD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689)
Director, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Director, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-631)
Director, Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-632)
Director, Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
N'.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigation, Denver, Colorado 80225
Director, Technical Support Division, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Motor Vehicle Emission Test Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Road,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 43105
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, (PM-226)
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26 West
St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Box 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 98114
F-7
-------
-3-
Dlrector, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, (MD-75) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Monitoring and Systems Lab/ORD, Clncinnatio, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office/ORD, (MD-52)
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Executive Officer, Support Services Office,-Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory/ORD, (MD-59)
Research Triangle, N.C. 27711
Director, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab, Ada, Oklahoma 74820
Director, Andrew W. Breidenbach, Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Georgia 30613
Corvallis, Oregon 97333
Duluth, Minnesota 55804
Environmental Research Lab,
Environmental Research Lab,
Environmental Research Lab, Narragansett, R.I. 02882
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
Regional Administrator, Region 1, Boston
Regional Administrator, Region 2, New York
Regional Administrator, Region 3, Philadelphia
Regional Administrator, Region 4, Atlanta
Regional Administrator, Region 5, Chicago
Regional Administrator, Region 6, Dallas
Regional Administrator, Region 7, Kansas City
Regional Administrator, Region 8, Denver
Regional Administrator, Region 9, San Francisco
Regional Administrator, Region 10, Seattle
Director, Administrator Services Division, Region 1
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management - Regions 2,3,4,6,7,4 3
Director, Office of Planning and Management Division, Region 5
Associate Regional Administrator for Policy Technical £ Res. Management - Region 9
Director, Management Division - Region 10
Financial Management Officer, Regions 1,2,4,5,3 & 10
Comptroller, Regions 3,6,7 i 9
F-8
-------
Attachment A
EPA'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 1985 APPROPRIATIONS ACT
The HUD-Independent Agencies Appropriation Act of 1985 (P.L. 98-371)
provided EPA with an additional 278 workyears and $79,521,000 above its
original 1985 request. Congress included guidance which, in some cases,
designated specific uses and, in other cases, granted the Administrator
discretion to satisfy Agency priorities.
With enactment of the bill, extensive discussions on implementing the
Add-ons have taken place within SPA's budget process. The Agency has had
to determine the most effective approach of addressing Congressional
priorities.
Further, we have recognized the need to meet several new demands such
as development of ac'id rain and groundwater initiatives, and initiate
reactions to the problem of leaking underground storage tanks. These
areas have grown in importance since EPA presented its budget to Congress
in January.
Our allocation of the additional resources Congress and the President
have- granted can best be discussed in the context of each appropriation
within the Act.
GROUNDWATSR AND HAZARDOUS WASTE INCREASE IN SALARIES AND EXPENSES
In the Salaries and Expenses appropriation, Congress provided
$17,000,000 to support 278 workyears. The Conference report directed
"that in allocating these increased resources, EPA give priority to
the additional positions and activities in the House and Senate reports.'
We have complied with Congressional intent and effectively assigned
workyears to the priority areas that Congress-designated. These include
resources for groundwater and underground injection control, technical
assistance to States, and hazardous waste research and regulations.
Under the groundwater/UIC initiative, we assigned resources to the
implementation of the groundwater strategy an.d the UIC program in non-
primacy States as well as to activities to control leaking underground
storage tanks. We directed technical assistance resources to toxic
substances enforcement for asbestos control, to water programs for work
in pre-treatment, and to hazardous waste activities to assist States.
In addition to addressing the advisory directives in the House,
Senate, and Conference reports, we considered the critical needs in the
acid rain and pesticides data call-in programs. We dedicated 26 work-
years to an Agency acid rain initiative, 19 workyears to support our
pesticides data call-in program, and A workyears to initiate on Agency-
wide monitoring review program.
F-9
-------
AN ADDITIONAL $5.0 MILLION IN R&D IS AVAILABLE FOR HEALTH EFFECTS
We allocated the additional resources provided in the Research and
Development appropriation which increased EPA's R&D funding by $29,563,000
over its original request as directed by Congress. The Agency used its
perogative given by Congress to distribute $.5,000,000 for health effects
across a number of environmental media. This includes $1,300,000 for air,
.$300,000 for toxics, $1,380,000 for pesticides, $1,000,000 for hazardous
waste, $720,000 for water quality, and $300,000 for interdisciplinary
programs.
AC&C FUNDING REFLECTS INITIATIVES
Abatement, Control, and Compliance funds increased by. $51,458,.000 in
the areas reflected in the Add-on. Since last January, EPA has identified
critical contract needs of $4,300,000 including groundwater ($650,000),.
acid rain ($400,000), leaking underground storage tanks ($1,750,000), air
toxics ($1,000,000), and pesticides data call-in ($500,000). We funded
these needs with reprogrammed resources from our contract program.
EPA IMPLEMENTED REMAINING ADD-ONS AS DIRECTED
We have applied the Add-ons to the appropriations for Buildings and
Facilities, Construction Grants, the Hazardous Substance Response Trust
Fund and Payment to the Trust Fund as Cottgress directed.
F-10
-------
ATTACHMENT A
**}
I
WORKYEAR DISTRIBUTION OF THE
FY 1985 CONGRESSIONAL ADD
>^v •vi~^s.v--v.vr
^ SO ^
-^ HAZARDOUS ^
^ WAS IE ^
^i:^::5^^^
60
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE
'S^SS'S-S'.'-'SS-srs-S-,
• 80 ;
• UIC :
'^ZZZZZZZZ'
%&%&^%
'JjziM^m
%^zz&2%£
^^^^^
;^^^^
^zz^zzZz.
aa
CONGfCvx>
:^:^^>i>
30
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE
: 66 :
; UIC :
'•Z&Z.'^&ZZZZ-.
^^^^^^
'Z-^'Z'-''^-'/^^
^2*?jte*£z. 45222.
as
CONGRESS
TARGETl'O
278 TOTAL
IV 'A
MAODRAJN
tttOAIA
CAU.-W
42
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
4
7~0"Afl AIR T°X»CS
15 ASBESTOS
13
PRTTRtAUlENT
41
GROUND
WATER
24
UIC
4LUST
ft8
CONGRESS
TARGETED
88FTE eflKIt 30FTE 53 FTE 39 FTE
CONGRESS GROUND WATER TECHNICAL HAZARDOUS OTHER
TARGETED AND UIC ASSJSTANCC WASTE NEEDS
(REGIONS)
-------
Attachment A
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1985 Abatement, Control & Compliance
Reprogranming for Agency Initiatives
(dollars in thousands)
MEDIA
Air
Air Toxics Emissions
Acid Rain
Air Subtotal
Drinking Water
Groundwater Compliance
Drinking Water Subtotal
Pesticides
Data Call-in
Pesticides Subtotal
Toxic Substances
Leaking Underground
Storage Tanks
Toxic Substances Subtotal
TOTAL INCREASES
INCREASES
+$•1,000.0
+400.0
+1,400.0
+650.0
+650.0
+500.0
+500.0
+1.750.0
+1,750.0
+$4,300.0
F-12
-------
MEDIA DECREASES
Air
Emmission Standards and Technical Assessment -$634.4
Air Subtotal -634.4
Water
Permit Issuance -79.3
Water Quality Enforcement -46.3
Effluent Standards and Guidelines -19.2.0
Ocean Disposal ' -127.8
Water Quality Monitoring -153.1
Corps of Engineers -692.3
Standards and -Regulations -99.0
Water Subtotal -1,389.8
Drinking Water
Criteria, Standards and Guidelines • -138.5
Drinking Water Subtotal -138.5
Hazardous Waste
Regulations, Guidelines and Policy -835.9
Hazardous Waste Subtotal -835.9
Pesticides
Generic Chemical Review -346.8
Pesticides Subtotal -346.3
Interdisclipinary
NEPA Compliance -185.9
Technical Support -64.2
Interdisclipinary Subtotal -250.1
Toxic Substances
Chemical Testing -704.5
Toxic Substances Subtotal -704.5
TOTAL DECREASES -$4,300.0
-0-
F-13
-------
Attachment
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE. CEILING RESTRICTIONS
This exhibit sets forth policies and procedures to manage the Congres-
sionally mandated Superfund Administrative Expense Ceiling.
I.
BACKGROUND
Public Law 96-510, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, also known as "Superfund," authorizes
removals or remedial actions in response to actual or threatened releases of
hazardous substances or certain pollutants or contaminants.
Funding for the Superfund program is achieved through a separate annual,
no-year appropriation, entitles Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund. The
legal limitation set by Congress on the Trust Fund appropriation requires the
Agency to stay within an administrative expense ceiling. Congressional intent
was to limit "overhead" expenses to ensure that the Trust Fund's primary
function—clean up of hazardous waste sites—was protected. Administrative
expenses encompass most intramural object classes (i.e., personnel compensation
and benefits (PC&B), travel, transportation of things, rent, communications
and utilities, printing, insurance, supplies and equipment), with the exception
of other contractual services, land and structures, and ADP contract services.
II. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Agency policy is that the legally binding administrative expense ceiling
placed on the Superfund appropriation will be centrally managed by the Office
of the Comptroller through a distribution of specific ceilings to the indivi-
dual Responsible Planning and Implementation Officers (RPIO's). 'The ceiling
encompasses the following intramural categories/object classes for which a
crosswalk is provided between the Resources Management Information System
(RMIS) category and the Financial Management Systems (FMS) object class codes.
CATEGORY/OBJECT CLASS
Included in the ceiling are:
Personnel Compensation & Benefits
Travel
Transportation of Things
Rent
Printing
Supplies
Equipment
Insurance
RMIS
41
42
43
44
45
47
48
50
FMS
11.00-11.32
12.00-12.4,3
13.00-13.02
21.00-21.98
22.00-22.97
23.00-23.93
24.00-2^.97
26.00-26.93
31.00-31.97
42.00-42.01
F-14
-------
CATEGORY/OBJECT CLASS
Excluded in the ceiling are:
Contractual Sen/ices
Land and Structures
ADP Contract Services
RMIS
46
49
63
FMS
25.00-25.98
32.00-32.51
25.16-25.96
Since each of the RPIOs must stay within their total administrative
expense ceiling, they should continually assess the impact of the ceiling
on projected and actual expenses in these object classes. If actual usage
indicates adjustments are needed, they should request approval for additional
ceiling from the Budget Division before obligations exceed that RPIO's
currently authorized ceiling.
You are reminded that although unused administrative expense ceiling
carries forward each year, travel ceiling does not. Requests for carryover
administrative expense ceiling and funds should be submitted in accordance
with the guidance provided in Policy and Procedure Memorandum #4-1, "Carry-
over Funds". Additionally, it continues to be Agency policy that Personnel
Compensation and Benefits (PC
-------
Attachment B
FY 1985 SUPERFUND
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CEILING
(dollars in thousands)
OFFICE
' INITIAL
OPERATING PLAN
CEILING
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response $10,828.6
Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation 156.2
Office of General Counsel 243.2
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring 4,851.7
Office of Inspector General 1,322.6
Office of Administration and Resources Management... 9,763.3
Office of Research and Development 3,312.6
SUBTOTAL - Headquarters $30,478.2
Region I $3,143.5
II 6,887.4
III 5,059.2
IV 5,332.9
V 6,620.0
VI 4,019.1
VII 3,745.7
VHI 2 ,020.7
IV ; 2,781.4
X 2,574.6
SUBTOTAL - Regions $42,174.5
Allocation Accounts $10,551.8
Funded Reserve 2,322.0
Unissued 2,046.5
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
$14.920.3
$87,573.0
F-16
-------
Attachment C
FY 1985 TRAVEL CEILINGS
(Dollars in Thousands)
RPIO
ADMIN. /STAFF
OEA
DIG
OPPE
OGC
OECM
OARM
OW
OSWER
OAR
OPTS
ORD
Salaries &
Expenses
$ 523.7
165.5
571.2
180.4
144.3
589.7
762.3
1,152.2
460.1
1,214.8
966.3
2,719.0
Abatement,
Control &
Compliance
m
Buildings &
Facilities
$100.0
SUBTOTAL-HO
$9,449.5
$100.0
Superfund
112.6
. 2.3
5.2
396.1
.114.5
820.5
169.4
$1 ,620.6
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
SUBTOTAL-R"!
ALLOCATION
ACCOUNTS
RESERVE
TOTAL
451,
661
660.0
990
1,047
812
489
566.8
618.0
524.1
$6,822.7
327.8*
$16,600.0
2.0
1.5
3.2
20.8
3.5
2.0
16.4
5.5
23.6
$ 78.5
S116.5**
S195.0
S100.0
$
$2
$1
229.4
532.5
352.5
368.1
493.5
275.2
209.9
139.5
213.0
166.9
,980.5
,591.4
$ 312.2***
$6,504.7
*
**
***
$25.1 will be distributed to Regions based upon final workyear. distributions.
For Indian Lands and Non-Primacy States in PWS Progran and UIC Direct Implementation.
$12.2 Earmarked, for Multi-Media-Superfund
F-17
-------
Attachment D
OPERATING PLAN CHANGE REQUEST PROCESS
I. General Guidance
The Budget Division will review change _requests on a weekly basis in an
effort to avoid backlogs and respond more effectively to office requests.
All offices submitting change requests will receive notification of approval
or disapproval action on their change request within two weeks of receipt of
the change requests. If you do not receive notification or an approved
Allowance with that timeframe, please call us concerning the status of your
request. Be reminded that approval is not effective until reflected in the
next Advice of Allowance; i.e., do not obligate funds until the change has
been made in the Allowances. Requests which require Congressional approval
will be submitted to the Congress as quickly as possible, but you should not
assume approval until you receive formal notification from our office.
II. Submission Requirements
When submitting change requests, you should take special care to adequately
explain the impact of this change on the gaining and losing program elements.
Please keep in aiind that we key these explanations into our computer files and
use them as our formal change documents for historical audit purposes. For
these reasons, we ask that you try and make very clear and concise explanations
of the changes you are requesting.
Also, as you review the need to reprogram each month, we would encourage
you to limit object class changes within program elements to those where
significant shifts in resources are necessary or, where travel or PC&5 are
affected.
On a more technical note, we would encourage you to fill out che change
request forms with black ink, if handwritten, or have them typed. This will
aid our staff in processing these changes.
III. Due Dates for Monthly Changes to Operating Plan
The Budget Division issues new Advices of Allowance by the third working
day of each month to reflect Agency program changes. In order that we might
meet this deadline, we have established due dates for the receipt of Allowance
Holder change requests in our office which will be considered for approval or
disapproval in the update of the monthly Operating Plan. Monthly due dates
for the remainder of the fiscal year for both change request forms ar.d elec-
tronically submitted data are as follows:
F-18
-------
FOR FUNDS TO
BE ISSUED IN
OPERATING PLAN CLOSEOUT DATS FOR
AS OF* CHANGE REQUESTS
November 1 Tuesday, October 23
December 1 Tuesday, November 20
January 1 Tuesday, December 18
February 1 Wednesday, January 23
March 1 Wednesday, February 20
April 1 Thursday, March 21
May 1 Monday, April 22
June 1 • Tuesday, May 2l
July 1 . Thursday, June 20
August 1 Tuesday, July 23
September 1 Wednesday, August 21
September 30 Wednesday, September 18
* Assumes request is approved by Budget Division and is for less than 3500,000.
Any request over $500,000 requires Budget Division and Congressional approval
and, as a result, issuance would not be guaranteed under the stipulations
above.
F-19
-------
CROSSWALK OF
AGENCY OBJECT CLASSES BETWEEN
FMS AND RMIS
F-21
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATION
AND RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Crosswalk of Agency Object Classes
FROM: C. Morgan Kfnghorn
Comptroller (PM-225)
TO: See Attached Listing
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide updated object class de-
finitions and an updated object class crosswalk that support the activities
covered in the appropriation currently available to EPA.
In Attachment A, I have provided a crosswalk of the Resources Management
Information System (RMIS) object classes to the Financial Management System
(FMS) object classes. It provides a list of FMS object class codes which
are aggregated in the RMIS for analysis of program utilization through the
current year and for preparation of budget estimates in future years. The
definition for each RMIS object class is provided for your information.
In Attachment B, I have provided a second crosswalk of object classes that
may generally be charged to each of the Agency's appropriations based on Con-
gressional, OMB, and EPA limitations. Specific restrictions are indicated
where appropriate. This list also provides an abbreviated crosswalk between
the RMIS and FMS object class codes to clarify appropriation limitations on
object class charging. Please take special note of the object classes which
apply to the Superfund Administrative Expense ceiling limitation.
Recently, the Financial Management Division revised and updated the list
of object class codes and definitions used by the Agency for accounting pur-
poses. This list is Appendix A in Chapter 15 of the Financial Management
Manual. I have included this list (Attachment C) for your use.
I hope that this information will aid you in your budget planning and
accounting responsibilities during the fiscal year. If you have questions
concerning RMIS (budget) object classes, please call the Budget Formulation
and Control Branch at 382-4176. If you have questions concerning FMS (charging)
object classes, please call the Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch at
382-5113.
F-23
-------
ADDRESSEES:
Executive Officer, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Associate Administrator for International Activities (A-106)
Associate Administrator for Regional Operations (A-101)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-110)
Director, Office of Civil Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Audit (A-109)
Director, Office of Investigations (A-109)
Director, Office of. Management and Technical Assessment (A-109)
Assistant Administrator for External Affairs (A-100)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Congressional Liaison (A-103)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)
Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources Management (PM-208)
Comptroller (PM-225)
Director, Budget Division (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Planning and Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Air, Radiation, Enforcement and Management Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Research and Development Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Water, Pesticides and Toxics Substances Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund/RCRA Branch (PM-225)
Director, Financial Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Reports and Analysis Branch (PM-226)
Director, Office of Administration (PM-217)
Director, Personnel Management Division (PM-208)
Director, Management and Organization Division (PM-213)
Director, Facilities and Support Services Division (PM-215)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Review and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Office of Information Resources Management (PM-211)
Director, Office of Budget and Control (PM-203)
Director, Office of Human Resources Management (PM-224)
Assistant Administrator for Policy, Planning and Evaluation (PM-219)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Director, Program Evaluation Division (PM-222)
F-24
-------
-2-
Ass.istant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office of General Counsel (T.E-130)
Assistant Administrator for Water (WH-556)
Director, Office of Water Enforcement and Permits (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Programs Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (WH-546)
Director, Office of Groimdwater Protection (WH-550)
Director, Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (WH-550)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339)
Director, Office of Mobile Sources (f -445)
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C)
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (AVR-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-788)
Director, Office of Toxics Intergration (TS-777)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Office of Research Program Management (KD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689)
Director, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Director, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-681)
Director, Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-682)
Director, Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
N.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigation, Denver, Colorado 80225
Director, Technical Support Division, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Motor Vehicle Emission Test laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Road,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, (PM-226)
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26 West
St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Kox 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 9H114
F-25
-------
-3-
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, (MD-75) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Monitoring and Systems Lab/ORD, Cincinnatio, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office/ORD, (MD-52)
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Executive Officer, Support Services Office, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory/ORD, (MD-59)
Research Triangle, N.C. 27711
Director, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab, Ada, Oklahoma 74820
Director, Andrew W. Breidenbach, Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Georgia 30613
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Corvallis, Oregon 97331)
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Duluth, Minnesota 55804
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Narragansett, R.I. 02882
Director, Environmental- Research Lab, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
Regional Administrator, Region 1, Boston
Regional Administrator, Region 2, New York
Regional Administrator, Region 3, Philadelphia
Regional Administrator, Region 4, Atlanta
Regional Administrator, Region 5, Chicago
Regional Administrator, Region 6, Dallas
Regional Administrator, Region 7, Kansas City
Regional Administrator, Region 8, Denver
Regional Administrator, Region 9, San Francisco
Regional Administrator, Region 10, Seattle
Director, Administrator Services Division, Region 1
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management - Regions 2,3,4,6,7,& 8
Director, Office of Planning and Management Division, Region 5
Associate Regional Administrator for Policy Technical & Res. Management - Region 9
Director, Management Division - Region 10
Financial Management Officer, Regions 1,2,4,5,8 & 10
Comptroller, Regions 3,6,7 & 9
F-26
-------
The information in Attachments A and B
has been incorporated into Chapter 5
of this Manual.
F-27
-------
ATTACHMENT C
I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'/' WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
301984 -
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATION
AND RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Financial Management Manual, Chapter 15, Appendix A,
Object Class Codes Fiscal Year 1985
/ *. T~r<»**—•*—'^Hf • AU~-***.
FROM: jfr/Jorddn M. Tatyfes'hita, Director
Q Financial Management Division
TO: See Attached List
I am forwarding an advance copy of a revised Appendix A of
Chapter 15 of the Financial Management Manual. This will be submitted
for final publication and distribution shortly. The new edition of
Appendix A provides the current object class codes for Fiscal Year
1985. In addition, it reflects all changes that were made to the
codes since Appendix A was last updated in Fiscal Year 1982.
These changes are summarized in Attachment I.
If you have any questions, please call Nellie Tippenhauer on
382-5113 or Tom Kelley on 382-5141.
Attachments
F-29
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OFFICERS
t
Chris O'Connor
Region I
Ron Gherardi
Region II
Robert Reed
Region III
William McBride
Region IV
Richard Walker
Region V
Richard Kenyon
Region VI
William Meyers
Region VII
Alfred Vigil
Region VIII
William Anning
Region IX
Mildred Martin
Region X
Richard Rune
Cincinnati, Ohio
Donald Mathis
Durham, N.C.
Alan Lewis
Las Vegas, Nevada
Robert All we in
HP-Financial Management
F-30
-------
SENIOR BUDGET OFFICERS
Sally Mansbach
EN-329
SAM RONDBERG, ORD
RD-674
CYNTHIA DOUGHERTY, OW
WH-556
DON FLATTERY, OEA
A-100
JACK HIDINGER, OANR
ANR-443
WALTER MUELKEN, OPTS
TS-788
DIANE BAZZLE, OA
A-100
THAD JUSZCAK, OSWER
WH-562A
BILL FINISTER, OARM
PM-208
Ed Canady
A-109
JOHN BEECHER, OPPE
PM-219
BILL STEWART, OGC
LE-130
F-31
-------
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION DIRECTORS
ASSISTANT REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
Lewis F. Gitto
Director, Administrative Services Division
Region I
Boston, MA
Herb Barrack
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy
and Management
Region II
New York, NY
Alvin Morris
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy
and Management
Region III
Philadelphia, PA
Howard Zeller
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy
and Management
Region IV
Atlanta, GA
Bob Springer
Director, Planning and Management Division
Region V
Chicago, ILL
John S. Fleeter
Assistant Regional Administrator for Management
Region VI
Dallas, TX
Susan Gordon
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy
and Management
Region VII
Kansas City, MO
Jack W. Hoffbuhr, Acting
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy
and Management
Region VIII
Denver, CO
F-32
-------
Charles Murray
Associate Regional Adninistrator for Policy
Technical and Resources Management
Region IX
San Francisco, CA
Nora McGee
Director, Management Division
Region X
Seattle, WA
F-33
-------
ATTACHMENT I
Page 1 of 3
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN OBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES SINCE FISCAL YEAR 1982
Added Codes
11.01 Jury Duty Fees
11.60 Performance Awards
11.70 Base Pay, Commissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling)
11.75 Quarters & Subsistence, Comnissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling) .
11.76 Other Pay, Ccmissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling) .
12.27 Social Security (PICA) Contributions, Connissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling)
12.28 Other Personnel Benefits, Commissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling) .
21.97 Interest Penalty - Travel and Transportation of Persons
21.98 Vehicles
22.13 Transportation of Things on Capitalized Property Freight in
Equipment with Purchase Price in Excess of $1,000
22.97 Interest Penalty - Transportation of Things
23.97 Interest Penalty - Rent, Communications, and Utilities
23.98 Mailcharge
24.97 Interest Penalty - Printing and Reproduction
25.13 ADP Contracts for the Redesign or Enhancement of Existing Systems
25.14 Feasibility Studies
25.21 Evaluation and Analysis Studies
25.51 Legal Services, Court Cases
25.71 Research Interagency Agreements
25.72 Demonstration Interagency Agreements
25.73 ADP and Information Support Interagency Agreements
25.74 Administrative Management Services Interagency Agreements
25.75 Policy and Regulatory Standards Development Interagency Agreements
25.76 Site Supervision and Development Interagency Agreements
25.77 Survey and Monitoring Interagency Agreements
25.78 Emergency Services to Others Interagency Agreements
25.79 Other Miscellaneous Interagency Agreements
25.96 Reimbursable Timeshare Distribution
25.97 Interest Penalty - Other Contractual Services
25.98 Office Equipment Maintenance
26.97 Interest Penalty - Supplies and Materials
26.98 Stores
31.07 Scientific and Technical Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less
31.08 Furniture and Office Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less
31.09 Purchase of ADP-Related Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less
31.10 Protective Equipment and Clothing - Personal - Valued $1,000 or Less
31.97 Interest Penalty - Equipment
41.84 Asbestos Hazards Abatement (Schools) Assistance Grants
41.85 SUPERFUND (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act) Remedial Planning and Implementation (Hazardous
Substances Response Trust Fund)
44.20 SUPERFUND (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act) State Credits
44.30 Consent and Settlement Amounts
F-34
-------
ATTACHMENT I
Page 2 of 3
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN OBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES SINCE FISCAL YEAR 1982
Amended Codes
11.61 Cash Award Program
25.16 ADP User and Operational Support and Facility Management Contracts
25.17 Telecommunication Services - .
25.23 ADP Contracts for the Development of New Systems
25.26 Management and Support Contracts
25.27 Other ADP Contracts and Services
25.32 Research and Development Contracts
25.70 Interagency Agreements
31.00 Equipment
31.01 Scientific and Technical Equipment Valued More Than $1,000
31.02 Furniture and Office Equipment Valued More Than $1,000
31.03 Purchase of ADP-Related Equipment Valued More than $1,000
31.06 Protective Equipment and Clothing - Personal - Valued More Than $1,000
31.11 Word Processing Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less
31.12 Dictation and Transcription Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less
31.14 Word Processing Equipment Valued More Than $1,000
31.16 Dictation and Transcription Equipment Valued More Than $1,000
31.80 Other Equipment Valued More Than $1,000
31.90 Other Equipment Valued $1,000 Or Less
41.00 Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
41.10 Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants Program Support
41.11 Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment Works
41.12 Air Pollution Control Program Support Grants
41.16 Great Lakes Pollution Control Assistance - Research and Demonstration
41.17 Water Pollution Control State and Interstate Program Support Grants
41.18 State Public Water System Supervision - Program Support Grants
41.19 State Underground Water Source Protection - Program Support Grants
41.20 Safe Drinking Water State and Local Program Development Support Grants
41.21 Training Grants
41.25 Fellowships
41.41 Research Grants
41.42 Research and Development Cooperative Agreements
41.45 Demonstration Grants
41.51 Water Pollution Control - State and Areawide Waste Quality Management
Planning Grants
41.55 Comprehensive River Basin Planning Grants
41.57 Hazardous Waste Management State Program Support Grants
41.61 Pesticides Enforcement Program Support Grants
41.63 Toxic Substances Program Grants
41.81 Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants - Special Purpose
41.83 Investigations, Surveys, or Studies
F-35
-------
ATTACHMENT I
Page 3 of 3
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN OBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES SINCE FISCAL YEAR 1982
Deleted Codes
25.22 Other Services
31.13 General Purpose ADP Peripheral Equipment
F-36
-------
2500
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
APPENDIX A — OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985
11.00 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION
Comprises gross compensation (before deductions for taxes and other
purposes) for personal services of individuals. This classification
covers all payments (salaries and wages, as well as overseas station
allowances considered as an incremental addition to salaries based upon
environmental conditions within an area) for personal services rendered
to the Government by its Officers or employees, either civil or uni-
formed, and compensation for services rendered by consultants or others.
(Payments to consultants serving under contractual arrangement who use
their own facilities and include in their charges related costs aside
from personal compensation are chargeable to major object class code
25). The reference to positions in the following classifications relates
to positions occupied and not to the type of appointment.
PERMANENT POSITIONS - Regular salaries and wages paid directly to
employees in full-time permanent positions as defined below, without
regard to type of appointment. Includes payment for leave used but
excludes premium pay.
Permanent positions are defined as full-time positions established for
a limited period of one year or more, or without time limit, or which
have been occupied for one year or more, regardless of the intent when
established.
POSITIONS OTHER THAN PERMANENT - Ccnprised of salaries and wages paid
directly to employees in positions not included' in full-time "permanent
positions" above. Includes payments for leave used but excludes premium
pay.
Temporary Employment - Regular pay for full-time employment in
positions established for a limited period of less than one year.
(e.g., seasonal work).
Part-time Employment - Regular pay for employment in positions
which require work on a prearranged schedule of hours or days of
work less than the prescribed hours or days of work for full-time
employees in the same group or class.
Intermittent Employment - Regular pay for employment of consultants
and others in positions which require work on an irregular or
seasonal basis, with hours or days of work only for time actually
employed or services actually rendered.
15-A-l
F-37 11/23/84
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
OTHER PERSONAL COMPENSATION - Comprised of all other personal com-
pensation paid directly to employees. Excludes base pay and pay for
leave used.
Overtime - Payments for services in excess of the 40 hour week or
8 hour day.
Holiday Pay - Payments for services of 8 hours or less on holidays.
Sunday Pay - Payments above the basic rate of 8 hours or less of
regularly scheduled work on Sundays for which this premium pay is
given.
Nightwork Differential - Payments above the basic rate for night-
work between 6:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. which is not subject to
overtime or Sunday pay.
Post Differential - Payments above the basic rate for service at
hardship posts abroad and which are based upon conditions of
environment differing substantially from those in the continental
United States.
Hazardous Duty Pay - Payments above the basic rate because of
assignments involving hazardous duty, e.g., flight pay.
Other Payments Above Basic Rates - Payments above basic rates for
any other premium pay, such as flight pay, premium pay in lieu of
overtime, merit pay, incentive awards, etc.
11.01 Jury Duty Fees - Refund for jury duty fees from employees on jury
duty.
11.12 Permanent, Full-Time, Civilian - Other Than Wage Board (PFT) -
Permanent refers to positions occupied without regard to type of
appointment and are positions established or occupied for a period
of one year or more.
11.13 Permanent Full-Time, Civilian - Wage Board (PFT) - See object class
code 11.12 above for definition of permanent.
11.19 Lump Sum Terminal Leave, Civilian - Payment made to a civilian
employee upon termination of employment with the Government for
the amount of unused accumulated leave.
15-A-2
F-38
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
11.31 Experts and Consultants (OPFT) - Compensation for services rendered
by experts and consultants employed on a per diem or fee basis.
(Payments to consultants serving under a contractual arrangement
are chargeable to major object class code 25).
11.34 Temporary Civilian (OPFT) - Regular pay for civilian and wage board
employees in positions where tenure is classified as temporary and
work schedule is classified as full-time, intermittent (WAE) and
part-time. Excludes experts and consultants. (See object class
code 11.31).
11.35 Straight Time, Non-Ceiling Employees Plans - Includes straight time
hours and dollars for employees serving in nonceiling and other OMB
approved exemptions which are excluded from FTE reporting requirements.
11.39 Personal Services, Civilian, All Other (OPFT) - Salaries and wages
paid directly to employees who do not fall in one of the above
categories, e.g., permanent employees working intermittent or
part-time.
11.51 Overtime Pay, (PFT) - Payment for services in excess of the 40 hour
week or 8 hour day for permanent full-time employees. (See object
class codes 11.12 and 11.13).
11.52 Night Differential - Payment above the basic rate for night work
between 6:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. which is not subject to overtime
or Sunday pay.
11.53 Overtime Pay (OPFT) - Payment for services in excess of the 40
hour week or 8 hour day for other than permanent full-time employees.
(See object class codes 11.31, 11.34 and 11.39).
11.54 Foreign Post Differential, Civilian - Payment above the basic rate
for services at hardship posts aboard which are based upon conditions
of environment differing substantially from those in the continental
United States.
11.55 Hazardous Duty Pay, Civilian - Payment above the basic rate for
assignments involving hazardous duty.
11.56 Sunday Pay - Pay above the basic rate of 8 hours or less of regularly
scheduled work on Sundays.
11.57 Holiday Pay - Payment for services performed on a legal holiday.
15-A-3
F-39
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
11.58 Overtime Pay, Non-Ceiling Employees - Payment for services in excess
of the 40 hour week or 8 hour day for nonceiling employees exempt
from FTE reporting requirements. (See object class code 11.35.)
11.59 Other Premium Pay, Civilian - Payment above the basic rate for any
premium pay not specified above, e.g., nonforeign differential.
11.60 Performance Awards - Cash payments to Merit Pay Employees (GM-13
through 15) whose performance for an appraisal period qualifies
for recognition under Section 5406 of the Performance Management
and Recognition System (PMRS).
11.61 Cash Award Program - Cash awards to Merit Pay Employees (GM-13
through 15) in recognition of suggestions, inventions, superior
accomplishments, or other personal efforts, special acts, or
services under Section 5407 of the PMRS.
11.62 Performance Awards - Payment to members of the Senior Executive
Service, of not more than 20% of their basic rate of pay, in addition
to the basic pay of the employee.
11.63 Meritorious Executive Awards (of rank) - Payment to members of the
Senior Executive Service of $10,000 in addition to the basic pay
of the employee.
11.64 Distinguished Executive Awards (of rank) - Payment to members of
the Senior Executive Service of $20,000 in addition to the basic
pay of the employee.
11.65 Other Personnel Compensation - Payments of cash awards, incentive
awards, in addition to the basic pay of the employee.
11.70 Base Pay, Comussioned Officers (Non-Ceiling) - Regular salaries
and hours paid directly to commissioned officers on IPA (Inter-
governmental Personnel Act) assignments (where EPA pays less than
50%). Excludes allowances for quarters and subsistence and
premium pay.
11.71 Base Pay, Camussioned Officers (PFT) - Regular salaries paid
directly to commissioned officers. Excludes allowances for quarters
and subsistence and premium pay.
11.72 Quarters & Subsistence, Commissioned Officers - Allowances for
quarters and subsistence paid to commissioned officers.
15-A-4
F-40
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
11.73 Other Pay, Commissioned Officers - All other pay of commissioned
officers including premium pay and differentials, except cost of
living allowances chargeable to object class codes 12.23 and 12.24.
11.74 Lump Sum Terminal Pay, Commissioned Officers - Payment to commissioned
officers upon termination of active duty status for the amount of
unused accumulated leave.
11.75 Quarters & Subsistence, Commissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling) - Allowances
for quarters and subsistence paid to commissioned officers on IPA
assignments (where EPA pays less than 50%).
11.76 Other Pay, Commissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling) - All other pay of
commissioned officers on IPA assignments (where EPA pays less than
50%) including premium pay and differentials.
11.81 Special Personal Services Payments - Compensation of persons not
reportable to the Office of Personnel Management as Federal employees,
and payments for personal services that do not represent salaries .
or wages paid directly to Federal employees. Includes total amount
paid to other agencies (compensation and benefits) for reimbursable
details of civilian or military personnel.
11.82 Intergovernmental Personnel Act - Refund for applicable personal
charges of employee on IPA assignment.
12.00 PERSONNEL BENEFITS
Comprises cash allowances paid to employees incident to their employment
and payments to other funds for the benefit of employees. Perquisites
provided in kind, such as uniforms or quarters, and payments to veterans
and former employees resulting from their employment, such as those
described under major object class codes 13 and 42, are excluded.
Expenses incurred by civilian employees in moving to new duty station,
as authorized in Public Law 89-516, such as subsistence and temporary
lodging, real estate costs, and miscellaneous moving expenses are in-
cluded. Dislocation allowances paid to Commissioned Officers are also
classified under this heading.
CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES - Cash allowances and payments to other funds for
civilian employees. Excludes perquisites provided in kind and payments
to former employees resulting from their employment.
Allowances - Includes quarters allowances, uniform allowances
(when paid in cash), reimbursements for notary public expenses,
15-A-5
F-41
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
1 ., \
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
'') '
allowances above basic rates of pay for services'outside the
District of Columbia to compensate for a higher cost of living at
the post of assignment than found in the contiguous 48 states and
the District of Columbia. Also includes allowances for separate
maintenancer education for dependents and transfers for employees
stationed abroad.
Payments to Other Funds - Includes employer's share of costs of
employees1 life insurance, health insurance, health benefits,
retirement, accident compensation (payments to the Bureau of
Employees' Compensation), Federal Insurance Contributions Act
taxes, and other such payments.
COMMISSIONED OFFICERS - Cash allowances and payments to other
funds for commissioned officers including uniform allowances, cost
of living allowances, dislocation and family separation allowances,
and employer's share of cost of Federal Insurance Contribution
Act (PICA) and Servicemen's Group Life Insurance. Excludes basic
allowance for quarters and subsistence.
PERSONNEL BENEFITS ]
12.10 Social Security (FICA) Contributions, Civilian (PFT) - Employer's
portion of Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes.
12.11 Retirement Contributions (PFT) - Employer's contribution to the
employee's retirement fund.
12.12 Insurance (FEGLI) Contributions (PFT) - Employer's share of the
Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance.
12.13 Health Benefits Contributions (PFT) - Employer's share of the
employee's Health Benefit Plan Costs. '
12.14 Foreign Allowances, Civilian (PFT) - Payment above the basic rate
for services rendered to compensate for a higher cost of living.
12.15 Nonforeign Allowances, Civilian (COLA) (PFT) - Payment above the
basic rate for services rendered to compensate for a higher cost
of living in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
12.16 Uniform Allowances, Civilian (PFT) - Payments fbr uniforms when
paid in cash to civilian employees. '
12.17 Permanent Change of Station Benefits, Civilian - For subsistence
and temporary housing expenses, real estate costs, and miscellaneous
15-A-6
F-42
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (COST.)
moving expenses related to permanent change of station of civilian
employees. Excludes family travel expenses and storage of household
goods chargeable to major object class codes 21 and 25.
12.18 Other Personnel Benefits, Civilian (PFT) - Payment for any item not
listed above. Excludes benefits related to permanent change of
station.
12.21 Insurance (SGLI) Contributions, Commissioned Officers - Employer's
share of the Servicemen's Group Life Insurance (Commissioned Officers).
12.22 Social Security (FICA) Contributions, Commissioned Officers - Employer's
portion of Federal Insurance Contribution Act taxes.
12.23 Foreign Allowances, Commissioned Officers - Payment above basic rate
for services rendered to compensate for a higher cost of living.
12.24 Nonforeign Allowances (COLA), Commissioned Officers - Payment above
basic rate for services rendered to compensate for a higher cost of
living in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
12.25 Permanent Change of Station Benefits, Commissioned Officers - Includes
dislocation and family separation allowances. Excludes family
travel expenses and storage of household goods chargeable to major
object class codes 21 and 25.
12.26 Other Personnel Benefits, Commissioned Officers - Includes uniform
allowances, personal allowances based on rank, and other allowances
not otherwise classified.
12.27 Social Security (FICA) Contributions, Commissioned Officers
(Non-Ceiling) - Employer's portion of Federal Insurance Contribution
Act taxes for commissioned officers on IPA assignments (where EPA
pays less than 50%).
12.28 Other Personnel Benefits, Commissioned Officers (Non-Ceiling) -
Includes uniform allowances, personal allowances based on rank,
and other allowances not otherwise classified for commissioned
officers on IPA assignments (where EPA pays less than 50%).
12.30 Social Security (FICA) Contributions, Civilian (OPFT) - Employer's
portion of Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes.
12.31 Retirement Contributions (OPFT) - Employer's contribution to the
employee's retirement fund.
15-A-7
F-43
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
12.32 Insurance (FEGLI) Contributions (OPFT) - Employer's share of the
Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance.
12.33 Health Benefits Contributions (OPFT) - Employer's share of the.
employee's Health Benefit Plan Costs.
12.34 Foreign Allowances, Civilian (OPFT) - Payment above the basic
rate for services rendered to compensate for a higher cost of
living.
12.35 Non-Foreign Allowances, Civilian (COLA) (OPFT) - Payment above
the basic rate for services rendered to compensate for a higher
cost of living in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands.
12.36 Uniform Allowances, Civilian (OPFT) - Payments for uniforms when
paid in cash to civilian employees.
12.38 Other Personnel Benefits, Civilian (OPFT) - Payment for any item
not listed above.
12.40 Social Security (FICA) Contributions, Civilian, Non-Ceiling Employee's
Plan - Employer's portion of Federal Insurance Contributions Act
taxes.
12.41 Retirement Contributions, Non-Ceiling Employee's Plan - Employer's
contribution to the employee's retirement fund.
12.42 Insurance (FEGLI) Contributions, Non-Ceiling Employee's Plan -
Employer's share of the Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance.
12.43 Health Benefits Contributions, Non-Ceiling Employee's Plan -
Employer's share of the employee's Health Benefit Plan Costs.
12.44 Foreign Allowances, Civilian, Non-Ceiling Employee's Plan - Payment
above the basic rate for services rendered to compensate for a
higher cost of living.
12.45 Non-Foreign Allowances, Civilian (COLA), Non-Ceiling Employee's Plan -
Payment above the basic rate for services rendered to compensate
for a higher cost of living in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the
Virgin Islands.
15-A-8
F-44
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
12.46 Uniform Allowances, Civilian, Non-Ceiling Employee's Plan - Payments
for uniforms when paid in cash to civilian employees.
12.48 Other Personnel Benefits, Civilian, Non-Ceiling Employee's Plan -
Payment for any item not listed above.
13.00 BENEFITS FOR FORMER PERSONNEL
Comprises pensions, annuities, or other benefits due to former employees
or their survivors based (at least in part) on the length of their
services to the Government, or other than benefits paid from funds
financed from employer and/or employee contributions and premiums.
Includes federal payments to funds which provide benefits to former
employees. Excludes benefits provided in kind, such as hospital and
medical care. Also excludes indemnities for the disability or death of
former employees.
Retirement Benefits - Compensation in the form of annuities or
other retirement benefits paid to former Government Personnel
(civilian or military) or to their survivors, exclusive of payments
from retirement trust fund.
Severence Pay - Payments made to former employees involuntarily
separated through no fault of their own.
Other Benefits - Unemployment compensation for Federal Employees
and ex-servicemen and other allowances paid directly to the
beneficiary.
13.01 Severence Pay - Payment for former employees involuntarily
separated from employment by the Government.
13.02 Benefits for Former Employees - Payments to cover unemployment
compensation payments of former employees.
21.00 TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION OF PERSONS
Includes transportation of Government employees or others, their per
diem allowances while in an authorized travel status, and other expenses
incident to travel which are to be paid by the Government either directly
or by reimbursing the traveler both for travel away from and in and
around permanent duty station and for rentals of passenger vehicles
from Government motor pools. It excludes those related travel expenses
authorized by Public Law 89-516 incurred by civilian employees in lo-
cating new living quarters which are properly recorded under major
15-A-9
F-45
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
object class codes 12, 22 and 25. Travel for EPA employees may not
be included in grants, contracts, or intergovernmental agreements
funded by EPA.
Transportation of Persons - Services in connection with carrying persons
from place to place, whether by land, air, or water, and the furnishing
of accommodations incident to travel. This includes commercial trans-
portation charges, rental of passenger cars, charter buses or airplanes,
ambulance service, and expenses incident to the operation of the rented
or chartered conveyances. (Rental of all passenger-carrying vehicles
is to be charged to this object class code, even though they may be
incidentally used for transportation of things).
It includes mileage allowances for use of privately owned vehicles and
related charges (such as ferry fares and tolls) which are specifically
authorized. It also includes streetcar and taxi fare (including
tips) whether used for local transportation or for travel away from a
designated post of duty.
Subsistence for Travelers - Payments to travelers of per diem allowances
for reimbursement of actual expenses for subsistence.
Incidental Travel Expense - Other expenses necessitated by travel, such
as baggage transfer, steamer chairs, and telephone and telegraph
expenses, as authorized by travel regulations. It does not cover
miscellaneous expenses incurred when in travel status which are not
directly related to travel.
CLASSES OF OBJECTS
Local Travel and Transportation
Object Class
Local Travel 21.91
Travel Away From Official Station
Object Class
Per Dian & Subsistence 21.11
Common Carrier 21.13
Privately Owned Vehicle 21.14
Commercial Rental 21.15
GSA Car Rental 21.16
Incidental Costs 21.17
15-A-10
F-46
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
DEFINITION OF OBJECT
a. Local Travel - Includes local travel and transportation of
persons in and around the official duty station of an employee. Examples
are taxi, subway, or bus fares.
b. Per Diem and Subsistence
(1) Per Diem - In lieu of subsistence expenses. Includes all
charges for meals/ lodging, personal use of room during
daytime, baths, all fees and tips to waiters, porters,
baggage handlers, bellhops, hotel maids, dining room
stewards, telegrams and telephone calls reserving hotel
accommodations, laundry, cleaning and pressing of clothing,
and transportation between places of lodging or business
and places where meals are taken.
(2) Subsistence - Reimbursement of actual subsistence expenses.
Authorization shall be limited to specific travel where
due to the unusual circumstances of the assignment the
maximum per diem allowance would be much less than the
.amount required to meet the necessary subsistence expenses
of a traveler. See Per Diem.
c. Commercial Carrier - Includes bus, train, steamer, and airplane.
d. Privately Owned Vehicle (P.O.V.) - The use of privately owned
automobile, motorcycle, and airplane. Includes automobile parking
fee, ferry rates, and bridge, road and tunnel tolls. Also, includes
aircraft landing and tie-down fees.
e. Commercial Rental - Includes hire of boat, automobile, aircraft,
livery, where the main purpose is the transportation of people. Includes
commercial rentals for which there is a GSA contract. Nonpassenger
vehicles are properly chargeable to object class code 22.06. Does not
include GSA vehicles.
f. General Services Administration Vehicles - Where the main
purpose is the transportation of people such as cars, buses, special
purpose vehicles, etc. Nonpassenger vehicles are properly chargeable
to object class code 22.06.
g. Incidental Costs - Includes taxicabs, limousine, baggage
handling charges, telephone, telegraph, stenographic or typing services
(excluding rental of typewriters), guides, interpreters, vehicles
15-A-ll
F-47
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
drivers, roan hire for official business, conversion of currency,
check cashing costs, travelers checks, travel document costs, and
other necessarily incurred expenses. For POV to airport and return,
use object class code 21.14.
21.97 Interest Penalty - Travel and Transportation of Persons - A late
payment charge added to the amount of a bill relating to travel
and transportation of persons, as authorized in Public Law
97-177 (Prompt Payment Act), when payment of a bill is made more
than 15 days after the due date.
21.98 Vehicles - Chargebacks to Agency program offices for costs
incurred under the Agency Support Budget for all vehicles rented
by the Agency from the General Services Administration (GSA) on
a monthly basis. It also includes all vehicle rentals for
Headquarters employees from the GSA Interagency Motor Pool in
Headquarters and the Regions.
22.00 TRANSPORTATION OF THINGS
Contractual charges for the transportation of things and for care of
such things while in process of being transported. It includes postage
used in parcel post, rental of trucks and other transportation equipment,
and reimbursements to Government personnel for the authorized movement
of household effects or house trailers. (Charges for the storage of
household goods shall be charged to object class code 25.80). It ex-
cludes transportation paid by vendor regardless of whether or not the
cost thereof is itemized on the bill for the commodities sold. Initial
transportation costs incident to delivery and installation of equip-
ment should be capitalized where conditions permit positive and ready
identification and the equipment meets the criteria for capitalization.
Freight and Express - Charges by common carrier and contract carrier,
including freight and express, demurrage, switching, recrating, re-
frigerating, and other incidental expenses.
Drayage and other Local Transportation - Cartage, handling, and other
charges incident to local transportation, including contractual transfers
of supplies, equipment, etc.
Commutation of Transportation Expenses - Payments to officers and employees
in lieu of payment of actual expense for transportation of household
goods and effects or house trailers upon transfer of personnel from one
official station to another.
15-A-12
F-48
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
22.06 Non-Passenger Vehicle Rental - Rental of commercial and GSA
(General Services Administration) nonpassenger vehicles (trucks,
forklifts, etc., including aircraft for other than passenger
transportation).
22.09 Transportation of Things (Anything $100 or Less) - Transportation
of packages and/or parcels (other than via U.S. Postal Service
for packages and/or parcels) by such carriers as United Parcel
Service (UPS), Federal Express Corporation, Emery Air Freight,
Purolator, etc. (This does not include local messenger services.
If the same vendor is providing local messenger services as well
as long distance services, a separate procurement request must
be set up for local messenger services under object class code
22.11).
22.11 Messenger and/or Courier Services - The pickup and delivery of
local messages from place to place using a courier service.
22.12 Transportation and Care of Things (Anything over $100) - Contractual
charges for the transportation and care of things via GBL's
(Government Bills of Lading) and/or CBL's (Ccrmercial Bills of
Lading), except charges applicable to object class codes 22.18,
22.92 and 22.93.
22.13 Transportation of Things on Capitalized Property Freight in
Equipment with Purchase Price in Excess of $1,000
22.18 PCS Transportation of Effects - Transportation of household goods
and effects related to an official change of station (For storage
see object class code 25.80).
22.92 Relocation of Offices - Transportation of equipment and supplies
due to relocation of offices via GBL's and/or CBL's, e.g., the
cost of transporting the equipment and supplies from the laboratory
in Athens, Georgia to another location such as Gulf Breeze,
Florida. (Labor costs for office relocations (room-to-room and
building-to-building) should be charged to object class code
25.81).
22.93 Relocation and Redistribution of Property - Transportation costs
to relocate and/or redistribute surplus property (furniture,
equipment, supplies, etc.) associated with reduction-in-force,
function consolidations, etc., via GBL's and/or CBL's.
15-A-13
F-49
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
22.97 Interest Penalty - Transportation of Things - A late payment
charge added to the amount of a bill relating to a contract or
purchase order for transportation of things, as authorized in Public
Law 97-177 (Prompt Payment Act), when payment of the bill is
made more than 15 days after the due date or when a discount is
taken after the discount period has expired and the underpayment
was not corrected within 15 days of the expiration of the discount
period.
23.00 RENT, COMMUNICATIONS AND UTILITIES
Rents - Charges for possession and use of land, structures, or equipment
(other than transportation equipment) owned by another person. It also
includes periodic charges under purchase rental agreements for equipment
prior to the time the title to the equipment is acquired. (Payments
subsequent to the acquisition of title should be classified as equipment).
It excludes payments under lease-purchase contracts for construction of
buildings (included in major object class code 32).
Communication Services - Includes the transmission of messages from
place to place, such as contractual charges for land telegraph service,
telephone and teletype service; charges for postage (other than parcel
post); contractual messenger service; and rental of post office boxes,
postage meter machines, mailing machines, and teletype equipment. It
also includes switchboard and service charges and telephone installation
costs.
Utility Services - Charges for heat, light, power, water, gas, electricity,
and other utility services exclusive of transportation and communication
service.
23.01 Land and Structures - Rental use of land and buildings owned by
another except rentals for data processing facilities (object
class code 23.09) and other rentals included in Standard Lever
User Charges Assessed by GSA (object class code 23.10).
23.02 ADP Software Packages - Lease or rental of commercially available
software packages. Maintenance is included when it is part of the
lease arrangement.
23.03 ADP Computer Systems and Equipment - Lease/rental or user charges
for all general purpose computer systems and equipment regardless
of capacity and cost. Computer systems are defined to include
CPU(s), memory, channels, and electronically connected devices
such as printers, tape and disk controllers and drives. ADP
15-A-14
F-50
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
equipment includes, interactive and batch terminals, plotters,
bursters, decol1aters, performance monitors, and special furniture.
23.04 Tel ecomtunicat ions Equipment- Lease/rental or user charges for
all data phones and other equipment associated with ADP tele-
communications networks.
23.05 Word Processing Rentals - Charges for all leased word processing
equipment, including software, and accessories furnished as part
of rental contracts.
23.06 Demurrage on Gas Cylinders
23.07 Rental of Other Equipment - Rental of other equipment not in-
cluded in any other object, e.g., postage meter, post office
boxes, excluding caimunication equipment.
23.08 Rental of Photocopy Equipment - Rental of photocopiers such as
Xerox, thermafax, etc.
23.09 Data Processing Facilities - Lease/rental of data processing
facilities. Data processing facilities are defined to include
computer rooms, tape libraries, off-site storage, office and
training areas.
23.10 Standard Level User Charges - Charges for rental of space and
related services assessed by the General Services Administration
as Standard Level User Charges (SLUG).
23.11 Local Telephone Service - Rental of telephone and charges related
to local service, e.g., switchboard charges, excluding installation
charges.
23.13 Long Distance Service - Rental of leased lines or dedicated
lines for long distance service including toll calls.
23.14 FTS Service - Rental of FTS lines and services from GSA.
23.15 Telephone Installations - Charges for installing telephones.
23.20 Utility Services - Charges for heat, light, power, water, gas,
electricity and other utility services. (Does not include the
purchase of raw fuel used for heating, etc., which is properly
chargeable to object class code 26.08).
15-A-15
F-51
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (COOT.)
23.25 Penalty Mail - Payment made to the U.S. Postal Service for the
cost of mailing normal Government correspondence, including U.S.
Postal Service Express Mail.
23.27 Other Communications - Services not included in one of the above
categories.
23.97 Interest Penalty - Rent, Comiunications, and Utilities - A late
payment charge added to the amount of a bill relating to a contract
for rent, communications, and utilities, as authorized in Public
Law 97-177 (Prompt Payment Act), when payment of the bill is made
more than 15 days after the due date.
23.98 Mailcharge - Chargebacks to Agency program offices for costs
incurred under the.Agency Support Budget for mailing normal
Government correspondence.
24.00 PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION
Comprises contractual printing and reproduction, and the related com-
position and binding operations performed by the Government Printing
Office, other agencies or other units of the same agency (on a reim-
bursable basis), and commercial printer. Includes all common processes
of duplicating and standard forms when specifically printed or assembled
to order, and printed envelopes and letterheads.
Note: This object class code consists of both (a) printing and binding
as defined in-the Government Printing and Binding Regulations issued by
the Joint -Committee on Printing, and (b) reproduction of the type which
does not come within the Joint Committee's definition.
Printing and Duplication - Job work done on printing presses which
utilize printer's type plates, or engravings; lithographing; multi-
graphing; reproduction with machines employing photographically-made
plates, related photo-reproduction work, the use of varityping or other
substitutes for typesetting for reproduction by photo-mechanical means;
reproductions by the spirit process; mimeographing; and the use of
stencils or direct image plates prepared by ordinary typewriters.
Binding Operations connected with the foregoing.
Photostating, blueprinting, and photography.
Microfilming.
15-A-16
F-52
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
24.01 Printing and Reproduction of Informational.Materials - Cost
associated with the printing and reproduction of any scientific
or informational material attributable in any way to EPA and
prepared by an EPA employee, consultant, contractor or grantee.
The material generally falls into one of the categories defined
by EPA Order 2200.4, dated December 28, 1981, and Attachment A
to the Administrator's policy memorandum dated December 28,
1981.
24.02 Federal Register Printing - Cost associated directly with
printing materials in the Federal Register, including reprints.
24.97 Interest Penalty - Printing and Reproduction - A late payment
charge added to the amount of a bill relating to a contract for
printing and reproduction, as authorized in Public Law 97-177
(Prompt Payment Act), when payment of the bill is made more than
15 days after the due date.
25.00 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Comprises all contractual services not otherwise classified. Supplies
and materials furnished by the contractor in connection with such services
are included even though they may be separately itemized on the voucher.
Charges for services in connection with initial installations of equip-
ment, when performed by the vendor, are included under the equipment
object class code. Includes contracts with State agencies and inter-
mediaries (service contracts). Includes consultant services when contract
involves use of consultant's facilities and other than personal services
costs are included in the price charged. Includes storage of household
effects.
Repairs and Alterations - Repairs and alterations to buildings, bridges,
viaducts, vessels, equipment, and like items, when done by contract.
Subsistence and Support of Persons - Contractual services for board,
lodging, care of persons, including hospital care (except travel items,
wh ich are included under travel).
Stenographic Services - Contractual stenographic reporting and
typing.
Publication of Notices, Advertising, and Radio Broadcast Time.
Tuition.
15-A-17
F-53
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
Fees and Other Charges - Fees for abstracting land titles,
premiums on insurance (other than payments to the Office of
Personnel Management), and surety bonds.
Operation of Facilities or Other Service Contracts.
25.13 ADP Contracts for the Redesign or Enhancement of Existing Systems -
Existing system modification includes such functions as systems
analysis, systems design, programming, testing, documentation,
training, parallel operations, and other activities necessary
to place portions of a revised system into production.
25.14 Feasibi1ity Studies - ADP contractual services for the performance
of feasibility studies in connection with a specific application
or a generally undefined management or technical problem.
25.16 ADP User and Operational Support and Facility Management Contracts -
Contracts for operational support provide for such functions as
data or software maintenance, production control, application
system operation, data reduction, or keypunch services. Facility
management contracts provide for management, operation, and
maintenance of government owned/leased equipment, software, and
facilities. Facility management contracts may also include
incidental space leases, supplies, and purchases or lease of
equipment and software.
25.17 Telecommunication Services - ADP contracts to provide communication
carrier services such as would be available from a microwave,
circuit switching, or telephone company.
25.18 Timesharing Services - Contracts for computer processing and
accessing telecommunications services. Also includes support
services such as production control, delivery, data entry, user
assistance and training when they are covered under the time-
sharing agreement.
25.19 Incidental ADP Operational Support - Contracts for operational
support that provide only one or two functions such as production
control, application system operation, data reduction, or keypunch
service, where these services are less than 10% of the total
program or research contract projects.
25.20 Maintenance of Data Processing Equipment - Contracts for
maintenance of owned equipment and software and of leased
15-A-18
F-54
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
equipment and software when maintenance is not part of the leasing
agreement. Not applicable if maintenance is provided
under a Facility Management Contract (see object class code
25.16).
25.21 Evaluation and Analysis Studies - ADP contracts for studies limited
to evaluation and analysis.
25.23 ADP Contracts for the Development of New Systems - New systems
development contracts provide for such functions as systems
analysis, systems design, programming, testing, documentation,
training, and conversion of new information applications.
25.24 Maintenance of Word Processing Equipment - Contracts for the
repair and maintenance of word processing equipment including
separate maintenance contracts for leased equipment.
25.25 Repairs and Alterations, Building and Grounds - Contracts for
the repair, maintenance (e.g., snow removal), and alteration of
buildings and grounds. Excludes major construction.
25.26 Management and Support Contracts - Contracts for management and
administrative support requirements not otherwise classified.
Included are stenographic services, typing and/or clerical services,
parking contracts, office equipment maintenance and repairs
such as typewriters, reproduction machines, and calculators,
laundry of uniforms and/or protective clothing and their rentals,
and maintenance of laboratory equipment, automobiles, and trucks.
Also included are Office of Research and Development laboratory
support services such as maintenance and care of laboratory
animals, guard service, etc.
25.27 Other ADP Contracts and Services - Contracts for other studies and
services not identified elsewhere.
25.29 Word Processing Typing Service Contracts - Contracts with vendors
supplying complete word processing typing services in which the
vendor provides operators as well as word processing equipment.
Such services include original keyboarding of draft material,
text editing and revision of documents, document assembly, pre-
paration, printing of documents, and distribution of documents
when specified by the user.
15-A-19
F-55
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
25.32 Research and Development Contracts - Contracts involving systematic
study directed toward fuller scientific knowledge or understanding
of the subject studied. This includes research or the systematic
use of knowledge gained from research, directed toward the production
of useful materials, devices, systems, or methods, including
design and development of prototypes and processes. Research
may include either basic or applied research. Development
also includes, but is not limited to: quality assurance
services, analysis and testing of samples, monitoring
activities that aid in the development of new and improved
sampling and analytical methods, review of research documents,
evaluation of technical outputs, preparation of manuals and
handbooks, and conduct of seminars and workshops. Also
included are demoastration activities that are part of
research or development, i.e., they are intended to prove
or to test whether a technology or method works.
25.33 Contracts for Consulting Services - Consulting services are those
services of a purely advisory nature relating to the government
functions of agency administration and management, and agency
program management. Consulting services are usually of an inter-
mittent nature and are not normally obtained on a repeated or
continuous basis. These services are provided by persons and/or
organizations who are generally considered to have knowledge and
special abilities that are not generally available within the
Agency. Contracts should be reported as consulting service only
if the requirement is to provide advice or evaluation of program
policy, strategy, performance or organization. Do not include
contracts required to implement statutory or Presidential require-
ments or for scientific or technical analysis, including statistical
or economic impact analysis.
25.35 Program Contracts - Planned dollars for contracts which support
program operations. Included in this category are contracts for
the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements, for the
development of regulations, standards, guidelines and criteria,
for monitoring, for surveillance and analysis, for pesticides
certification, for regional laboratory analysis, and for special
studies and analyses of programs. Management, administrative
and research contracts are not included in this category.
25.36 Aircraft Maintenance - Contracts for the repair and maintenance
of aircraft owned or leased.
25.37 Health Units - Contracts for the operation of health facilities.
15-A-20
F-56
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
25.38 Security Investigations - Contracts for conducting security
investigations.
25.40 Advertising - Cost of newspapers advertisements.
25.44 Registration and Other Fees Not Otherwise Classified - Examples
are fees for abstracting land titles, premiums on insurance
(other than payments to the Office of Personnel Management),
security bonds, and registration fees for meetings.
25.45 Training - Contracts with other Federal agencies, universities,
etc., for training, tuition, and graduate studies. Includes
books, and reimbursement to employees for training.
25.46 Occupational Health and Safety Training - Contracts with other
Federal agencies, universities, private firms, etc., for training
specific to meeting occupational health and safety requirements
for both OHS Designees and all employees.
25.47 Occupational Health Monitoring - Contracts for supplying services
to meet the requirements of the Agency occupational medical
monitoring program.
25.49 Occupational Health and Safety Services, Other - Contracts for
occupational health and safety work which support program operations,
as defined in OMB Circular A-ll. (Examples: inspection of fire
extinguishers, testing of laboratory fume hoods, development of
safety manuals, etc.)
25.50 Custodial Services - Contracts for such services as janitorial,
fire protection, and security.
25.51 Legal Services, Court Cases - Charges for legal service fees
levied by the courts.
25.70 Interagency Agreements - Contracts and agreements with
other Government agencies.
25.71 Research Interagency Agreqnents - Agreements involving systematic
study directed toward scientific knowledge or understanding of
the subject studied. This includes research, and the systematic
use of knowledge gained from research, directed toward the
production of useful materials, devices, systems, or methods,
including design and development of prototypes and processes.
Research may include either basic or applied research.
15-A-21
F-57
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
Development also includes, but is not limited to: quality
assurance services, analysis and testing of samples,
monitoring activities that aid in the development of new and
improved sampling and analytical methods, review of research
documents, evaluation of technical output, preparation of
manuals and handbooks, and conduct of seminars and workshops.
25.72 Demonstration Interagency Agreements - Agreements for the
principal purpose of supporting projects which test and provide
new or improved techniques or technology, i.e., pilot
projects.
25.73 ADP and Information Support Interagency Agreements - Agreements
for the principal purpose of providing computer system time,
systems design and programming services, repair and maintenance
of data processing equipment, ADP/telecommunications services,
data access, ADP studies, advice on ADP acquisition, and ADP
library and consulting services.
25.74 Administrative Management Services Interagency Agreements -
Agreements providing for a variety of management services.
These include travel, space rental, lease agreements,
communications, utilities, printing and reproduction, equip-
ment, personnel training, organization and management studies
or manual preparations, manpower utilization studies and
related services. (Does not include agreements or orders
specifically written for Standard Level User Charges,
object class code 23.10; FTS, object class code 23.14; Print-
ing and Reproduction, object class code 24.01; 0PM
Training, object class code 25.45).
25.75 Policy and Regulatory Standards Development Interagency
Agreements - Agreements for the principal purpose of
developing, reviewing and evaluating proposed or existing
standards, regulations or guidelines.
25.76 Site Supervision and Development Interagency Agreements -
Agreements for the purpose of construction monitoring,
investigating, studying and cleaning up hazardous waste
sites or emergency response on oil spills or other
similiar situations.
25.77 Survey and Monitoring Interagency Agreements - Agreements
for the principal purpose of information collection
support for land, air or water quality evaluation.
15-A-22
F-58
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
26.00 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
Comprises all commodities whether acquired by formal contract or other
form of purchase which are (a) ordinarily consumed or expended within
one year after they are put into use, (b) converted in the process of
construction or manufacture, or (c) used to form a minor part of equip-
ment or fixed property.
26.01 Laboratory Supplies - Items such as chemicals, and glassware to
be used in the laboratory.
26.02 Office and Administrative Supplies - Examples are standard forms,
pencils, penalty, and plain envelopes, desk trays, etc.
26.03 Subscriptions - Subscriptions to newspapers and periodicals.
26.04 ADP Supplies - Examples are printer paper and special forms,
magnetic tapes and disks, ribbons and ink, punched cards, and
in-house training.
26.05 Maintenance Supplies - Materials and parts entering into con-
struction or repair of equipment and building.
26.06 Protective Equipment and Clothing - Personal protective equipment
and clothing which is to be utilized by Agency personnel to meet
occupational health and safety requirements for specific duties
or ongoing program needs.
26.07 ADP Software Packages - Purchase of commercially available
software packages and maintenance when it is part of the purchase
price.
26.08 Fuel Supplies - Charges for fuels used in heating, cooking,
generating power, manufacturing artificial gas, and operating
motor vehicles, trains, aircraft, and vessels. (Does not include
utility services which are properly chargeable to object class
code 23.20).
26.10 Other Supplies and Materials - Examples are cleaning and toilet
supplies, clothing and sewing supplies, pamphlets, documents,
and provisions for human consumption.
26.11 Off-the-Shelf Printing and Audiovisual Products - Purchase of
finished commercial productions for Agency use. This includes
the purchase of rights and preprinted materials as well as
15-A-24
F-60
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
25.78 Emergency Services to Others Interagency Agreements -
Agreements for the principal purpose of providing
emergency assistance to individuals, such as the
relocation of persons or their possessions because of
hazardous situations.
25.79 Other Miscellaneous Interagency Agreements - Agreements for
any service not covered in object class codes 25.71 through
25.78. Specifically excludes payments made to other agencies
for services of civilian and military personnel on
reimbursable detail, which are classified under object class
code 11.81. Also excludes charges for contractual services in
connection with the operation of health facilities, which are
classified under object class code 25.37,,
25.80 Storage of Household Goods.
25.81 Moving and/or Labor Service - Labor costs for office relocations,
rcom-to-room and building-to-building. Commercial transportation
costs associated with the move are chargeable to the appropriate
object class codes under major object class code 22.
25.82 Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses - All costs incurred
under a single facility maintenance operations contract for
EPA-owned facilities.
25.96 Reimbursable Timeshare Distribution - Reimbursement to the
National Computer Center for cost of computer system time.
25.97 Interest Penalty - Other Contractual Services - A late payment
charge added to the amount of a bill relating to a contract or
purchase order for other contractual services, as authorized in
Public Law 97-177 (Prompt Payment Act), when payment of the bill
is made more than 15 days after the due date or when a discount
is taken after the discount period has expired and the under-
payment was not corrected within 15 days of the expiration
of the discount period.
25.98 Office Equipment Maintenance - Chargebacks to Agency program
offices for costs incurred under the Agency Support Budget for
all maintenance contracts on all Agency-owned typewriters,
calculators and dictating equipment.
15-A-23
F-59
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (OONT.)
materials with modifications. Audiovisual programs purchased
for use in training also should be included, e.g., public service
announcements, edited stock-footage productions.
26.97 Interest Penalty - Supplies and Materials - A late payment charge
added to the amount of a bill relating to a contract or purchase
order for supplies and materials, as authorized in Public Law
97-177 (Prompt Payment. Act), when payment of the bill is made
more than 15 days after the due date or when a discount is taken
after the discount period has expired and the underpayment was
not corrected within 15 days of the expiration of the discount
period.
26.98 Stores - Chargebacks to Agency program offices for costs incurred
under the Agency Support Budget for all common office use and
word processing supplies from the Agency's Self-Service Store.
31.00 EQUIPMENT
Comprises personal property of a more or less durable nature - that is,
which may be expected to have a period of service of one year or more
after put into use without material impairment of its physical condition.
It includes charges for service in connection with initial installation
or reinstallation of equipment when performed under contract. It excludes
commodities which are converted in the process of construction or manu-
facture, or which are used to form a minor part of equipment or fixed
property. Monetary values of $1,000 are based on individual items.
Transportation Equipment - Vehicles, including passenger-carrying
automobiles, motor trucks, motorcycles, tractors, aircraft, wagons,
carts, vessels, steamships, barges, and power launches.
Furniture and Furnishings - Movable furniture, fittings, and house-
hold equipment, including desks, tables, chairs, typewriters,
adding and bookkeeping machines, hospital and household equipment.
Books for permanent collections.
Implements and Tools.
Machinery - Engines, generators, manufacturing machinery, trans-
formers, ship equipment, pumps, and other production and construction
machinery.
15-A-25
F-61
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
Instruments and Apparatus - Surgical instruments, X-ray apparatus,
signaling and telephone and telegraph equipment, electronic equip-
ment, scientific instruments and appliances, measuring and weighing
instruments and accessories, photographic equipment, picture pro-
jection equipment and accessories, and mechanical drafting devices.
31.01 Scientific and Technical Equipment Valued More Than $1,000 -
Examples are measuring and weighing instruments and accessories,
and mechanical drafting devices.
31.02 Furniture and Office Equipment Valued More Than $1,000 - Examples
are executive desks, tables, and chairs.
31.03 Purchase of ADP-Related Equipment Valued 'More Than $1,000 -
Equipment includes central processors, memory, channels, peripheral
devices, controllers, interactive and batch terminals.
31.06 Protective Equipment and Clothing - Personal - Valued More Than
$1,000 - Protective equipment and clothing valued at more than
$1,000 or has over one year's duration of life which is to be
utilized by Agency personnel to meet occupational health and safety
requirements for specific duties or ongoing program needs.
31.07 Scientific and Technical Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less - Examples
are small drafting tables and small instruments.
31.08 Furniture and Office Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less - Examples
are certain typewriters, calculators, and small chairs.
31.09 Purchase of ADP-Related Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less - Equip-
ment includes data phones and modems, plotters, bursters, de-
collaters, and other ADP equipment not specifically identified.
31.10 Protective Equipment and Clothing - Personal - Valued $1,000
or Less - Protective equipment and clothing that is to be utilized
by Agency personnel to meet occupational health and safety
requirements.
31.11 Word Processing Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less - Includes
software and accessories.
31.12 Dictation and Transcription Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less -
Examples are charges for service in connection with initial
installation or reinstallation of equipment.
15-A-26
F-62
-------
. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
31.14 Word Processing Equipment Valued More Than $1,000 - Includes
lease-to-purchase conversions and original purchase actions
for word processing equipment, including charges for service in
connection with initial installation or reinstallation of
equipment.
31.15 Books - For permanent libraries.
31.16 Dictation and Transcription Equipment Valued More Than $1,000 -
Includes dictation and transcription equipment and accessories.
31.80 Other Equipment Valued More Than $1,000 - Examples are aircraft,
photographic equipment, engines.
31.90 Other Equipment Valued $1,000 or Less - Examples are hand tools,
small pumps.
31.97 Interest Penalty - Equipment - A late payment charge added to the
amount of a bill relating to a contract or purchase order for
equipment, as authorized in Public Law 97-177 (Prompt Payment
Act), when payment of the bill is made more than 15 days after
the due date or when a discount is taken after the discount
period has expired and the underpayment was not corrected
within 15 days of the expiration of the discount period.
32.00 LAND AND STRUCTURES
Comprises land and interest in land, buildings and other structures,
additions to buildings, nonstructural improvements, and fixed equipment
(whether an addition or replacement), when acquired through purchase.
Lands and Interest in Lands, Including Easements and Rights of Way.
Building and Other Structures - The acquisition or construction of
buildings and structures, and additions thereto, when acquired under
contract. This includes principal payments under lease-purchase
contracts for construction of buildings.
Non-Structural Improvements - Improvements of land, such as
landscaping, fences, sewers, wells, reservoirs, when acquired
under contract.
Fixed Equipment - Fixtures and equipment which become permanently
attached to or a part of buildings or structures such as elevators,
plumbing, power-plant boilers, fire alarm systems, lighting or
15-A-27
F-63
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
heating systems, and air conditioning or refrigerating systems
(whether an addition or a replacement), when acquired under
contract. This includes charges for services in connection with
initial installations or reinstallations of fixed equipment when
performed under contract.
32.01 Land - Land, interest in land, easements, rights of way, and
improvements, such as fences, sewers, wells.
32.02 Buildings and Other Structures - The acquisition or completed
construction of buildings or structures, additions to these
structures, fixtures and equipment which form a part of these
structures, such as fire alarm systems, elevators, plumbing.
32.03 ADP Facilities - Purchase, construction or modifications of data
processing facilities. Data processing facilities are defined
to include computer rooms, tape libraries, off-site storage,
office and training areas. Modification includes improvements
such as raised floors, environmental controls, and security
controls.
32.51 Construction in Progress - The construction of buildings,
structures additions to these structures, or improvements to
land; must be transferred to object class code 32.01 or 32.02
upon completion.
41.00 GRANTS, SUBSIDIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS
Comprises grants and cooperative agreements, subsidies, gratuities,
and other aid for which cash payments are made to States, other political
subdivisions, corporations, associations and individuals; contributions
to international societies, commissions, proceedings, or projects,
whether in lump sum or as quotas of expenses; contributions fixed by
treaty; grants to foreign countries; taxes imposed by taxing authorities
where the Federal Government has consented to taxation (excluding the
employer's share of taxes). Includes readjustment and other benefits
for veterans, other than indemnities for death or disability. (Note
the obligations under grant programs which involve the furnishing of
services, supplies, materials and the like, rather than cash are not
charged to this object class code, but the object class code representing
the nature of the services, articles, or other items which are purchased
or otherwise provided).
41.10 Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants Program Support - A
consolidated grant award to state, interstate or local government
15-A-28
F-64
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
agencies for management of various environmental protection
activities ipcluding but not limited to air, water, and solid
waste pollution. Various applicable statutes. Assistance program
code "M". Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number
66.600.
41.11 Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment works - Awards to
state, interstate or local government agencies for the construction
of municipal wastewater treatment works (CFDA number 66.418).
Al§o includes Construction Management Assistance Grants (CFDA
number 66.438) and Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment
Works for Combined Sewer Overflows to Marine Bays and Estuaries
(CFDA number 66.455). P.L. 84-660 (Section 8): P.L. 92-500
(Section 109 and 201). Assistance program code "C".
41.12 Air Pollution Control Program Support Grants - Awards to state,
interstate and local government agencies to aid them in planning,
maintaining, and improving programs for the effective prevention
and control of air pollution. P.L. 91-604 (Section 105 and
106). Assistance Program Code "A".
41.16 Great Lakes Pollution Control Assistance - Research and Demonstration -
Awards to state and interstate government agencies and to private
organizations and individuals for the purpose of carrying out pro-
jects for the control and prevention of pollution within the
Great Lakes and their waterways. P.L. 92-500 (Section 104 and
108). Assistance program codes "R" and "S".
41.17 Water Pollution Control State and Interstate Program Support
Grants - Awards to state and interstate government agencies to
aid them in establishing and maintaining adequate programs for
the prevention and control of water pollution. P.L. 92-500
(Section 106). Assistance program code "I" (CFDA number 66.419).
41.18 State Public Water System Supervision - Program Support Grants -
Awards to states to aid in the development and implementation of
public water system supervision programs. P.L. 93-523 (Section
1443a and 1450). Assistance program code "F" (CFDA number 66.432).
41.19 State Underground Water Source Protection - Program Support
Grants - Awards to states to aid in the development and implementation
of underground water injection control programs plans. P.L.
93-523 (Section 1443b and 1450). Assistance program code "G"
(CFDA number 66.433).
15-A-29
F-65
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
41.20 Safe Drinking Water State and Local Program Development Support
Grants - Awards to state and local government agencies for development
of water supply plans and programs other than those authorized
under P.L. 93-523 (Sections 1442 (b)(3)(c), and 1443). Assistance
program code "H".
41.21 Training Grants - Awards to state and local government agencies
and to educational institutions for the purpose of developing
and conducting training programs for the education of personnel
in the field of abatement and control of environmental pollution.
P.L. 91-52 (Section 204 and 210); P.L. 92-500 (Section 104, 109,
110 and 111); P.L. 93-523 (Section 1442); P.L. 92-516 (Section
23); P.L. 91-604 (Section 103). Assistance program code "T".
41.25 Fellowships - Awards to educational institutions for the academic
training of specified individuals in the field of abatement and
control of environmental pollution. P.L. 92-500 (Section 104);
P.L. 91-604 (Section 103). Assistance Program Code "U".
41.41 Research Grants - Awards to governmental and nongovernmental
organizations and individuals in support of research and develop-
ment projects designed to identify causes, effects, extents,
prevention and control of environmental pollution. P.L. 78-410
(Section 241 and 246); P.L. 92-500 (Section 104 and 105); P.L.
91-52 (Section 204 and 205); P.L. 93-523 (Section 1442); P.L.
92-516 (Section 20); P.L. 91-604 (Section 103 and 104). Assistance
program code "R".
41.42 Research and Development Cooperative Agreements - Awards to
governmental and nongovernmental organizations and individuals
in support of research and development projects designed to
identify causes, effects, extents, prevention and control of
environmental pollution on which there is substantial involvement
in the conduct of the research project by the awarding organization.
(P.L. 95-224). Assistance program code "R".
41.45 Demonstration Grants - Awards to governmental and nongovernmental
organizations and individuals in support of projects designed to
demonstrate new or improved techniques to enhance environmental
control. P.L. 92-500 (Section 104, 105, 107, 108 and 113); P.L.
93-523 (Section 1442 and 1444); P.L. 91-604 (Section 103 and
104); P.L. 91-52 (Section 204). Assistance program code "S".
15-A-30
F-66
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
41.51 Water Pollution Control-State and Areawide Waste Quality Management
Planning Grants - Awards to state, regional and local government
agencies to aid in the development of initial areawide waste
treatment plans for specific areas approved by the appropriate
Regional Administrator. P.L. 92-500 (Section 208). Assistance
program code "P".
41.55 Comprehensive River Basin Planning Grants - Awards to planning
agencies to aid them in preparing recommendations for more effective
and economical ways by which municipalities, and industries, can
collect, store, treat and purify waste. P.L. 84-660 (Section
3c). Assistance program code "B".
41.57 Hazardous Waste Management State Program Support Grants - Awards
to state, interstate, and local governments to aid in the development
and implementation of programs to solve hazardous waste management
problems and control hazardous waste management systems. P.L.
94-580 (Section 3011, 4007-4009). Assistance program code "D"
(CFDA number 66.801).
41.61 Pesticides Enforcement Program Support Grants - Awards to State
Pesticides Regulatory Agencies to aid in the development of
state and local pesticides control capabilities (CFDA number 66.700).
Includes Applicator Training and Certification Program Grants.
P.L. 92-516 (Section 23). Assistance program code "E".
41.63 Toxic Substances Program Grants - Awards to states for the
establishment and operation of programs to prevent or eliminate
unreasonable risks associated with a chemical substance or mixture.
Section 28, P.L. 94-469.
41.81 Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants-Special Purpose -
Consolidated assistance awards to governmental and nongovernmental
agencies for accomplishment of specific environmental protection
activities. Excluded from this category are Consolidated
Program Support and Consolidated Research Grants. Various appli-
cable statutes. Assistance program code "Y".
41.83 Investigations, Surveys, or Studies - Awards to governmental and
nongovernmental organizations and individuals for investigations,
surveys, or studies of nonresearch nature for the prevention,
reduction, or elimination of air, water, and solid waste pollution.
Various applicable statutes. Assistance program code "X".
15-A-31
F-67
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
41.84 Asbestos Hazards Abatement (Schools) Assistance Grants - Awards to
local educational agencies for abatement of asbestos hazards.
P. L. 98-377. Assistance program code "J" (CFDA number 66.702).
41.85 SUPERFUND (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act) Remedial Planning and Implementation (Hazardous
Substances Response Trust Fund) - Awards to governmental and non-
governmental organizations and individuals for remedial planning
and implementation of the reduction or elimination of hazardous
substances. Assistance program code "V (CFDA number 66.802).
42.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS AND INDEMNITIES
Comprises payments of claims on life and marine insurance policies;
annuities paid from trust funds to former employees and others; indemnities
for destruction or injury of persons or property, and other losses.
Insurance Claims - Insurance loss claims, including payments on
guarantees where no asset is received (Guaranteed Student Loan
Programs). Includes benefits paid from the Federal retirement
and social insurance funds (SSA Benefit Payments and Medicare
Payments).
Indemnities - Compensation for loss of injury (not covered by
Government Insurance) such as awards arising from abrogation of
contracts; damage to or loss of property; and personal injury or
death. Includes indemnities to veterans and former civilian
employees or their survivors for death or disability, whether
service connected or not. Also includes losses made good on
Government shipment.
42.01 Insurance Claims and Indemnities - Benefits paid from the
Federal retirement and social insurance funds, compensation for
losses on Government shipments or contracts. Employees and
other claims for damages or loss under public law.
44.00 REFUNDS
Comprises refunds of the whole or part of amounts previously received
by the United States.
15-A-32
F-68
-------
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2500
OBJECT CLASS CODES FISCAL YEAR 1985 (CONT.)
44.10 Refunds of General and Trust Fund Receipts.
44.20 SUPERFUND (Conprehensive Environmental Response, Condensation, and
Liability Act) State Credits.
44.30 Consent and Settlement Amounts.
15-A-33
F-69
-------
NAPA
BIBLIOGRAPHY
F-71
-------
pocngars JEVIEBED BY THE NAPA/EPA BUDGET PROCESS STTIDT TEAM
I* Briefing Documents;
* Overview of th« Environmental Protection Agency, prepared for Che
National Academy of Public Administration, August 25, 1983
* EPA'a Budget. ..Overview. Structure. Process. Issues. June 8, 1983
* FT 1983 Budget Process Volume I, II and III
— FT 1983 Guidance and Process
- FT 1983 Budget Call Letter
• FT 1983 National Program Hanager (NPM) Submission
- FT 1983 Pas8back (Agency)
. - FT 1983 Appeals (Agency)
- FT 1983 Budget Submission to CMS (2 volumes)
• A-ll Preparation and Submission of Budget Estimates
- Items Prepared in Accordance with A-ll
- FT 1983 Passback (CMB)
- FT 1983 Appeals ((MB)
• Requirements and Format for 1983 Congressional Submission
- FT 1983 Justification of Appropriation Estimates for
Committee on Appropriations (1 volume)
- Press Conference Materials
- Workload Model Call Letter
- "White Paper" on Workload Analysis
• Survey of Workload Analysis Methods
- Summaries of 23 Workload Models
- Sample Workload Model Allocation Procedures
- Workload Models
- Operating Plan Call Letter - Phase I
- Operating Plan Call Letter - Phase II
- Operating Plan Highlight Memo
- Operating Plan Call Letter - Phase III
• Contracts Submission
- Analysis of Congressional Action on FT 1983 Appropriation Bill
- FT 1983 Allowance Letter
* Region II Budget Process and Internal Controls. FT 84 Briefing Book
* Region V FT84 Regional Planning Process Guidance. March 8, 1983
F-72
-------
2. EPA Manual* t
* Organisation and Functions Manual, 1982 Edlcion
* Delegations Manual. Environmental Protection Agency, May 7, 1982
* Planning and Budgeting Manual. April I!, 1980
* Resource Management Information System, EPA Comptroller's
Office, June 1981
' Budget Tracking Module User's Guide. ORD, March 1982
* Fund Control Manual. July 11, 1975
* Financial Management Manual. August 19, 1976
• Timekeeping Manual. July 27, 1983
3» EPA Reports and Published Documents;
* Administrator's Guidance Operating Year FT 1984 - Budget Year
FT 1985. EPA. February 1983
' Water Research Strategy FY 1985 - (Draft Report, March 31, 1983)
* Office of Water Operating Guidance and Accountability System,
FY 1984, Office of Water, March 1983
0 Administrator's Management Accountability System FY83 Goals,
Objectives Committments and Measures, November 3, 1982
* EPA Administrator's Management Accountability System - Third
Quarter FY 1983 Report
* Office of Research and Development Program Planning and Documentation
Guide. EPA August 14. 1983
* Planning in the EPA Regional Offices, Prepared by Planning 4
.Evaluation Branch, Region I, September 1982: ...
' Region V - FY84 Regional Planning Process. March 8, 1983
F-73
-------
* Environmental Management Report. Region X, March 1983
*" Office of Research and Development (ORD) Laboratory/
Project Comic tee Report. June 11, 1982 - Committee for
the Review of the Organizational and Scientific Capability
of ORD Laboratories
* Policy and Management Review of Headquarters/Regional
Relationehipa. September 1983
* Final Report .of the State/Federal Roles Taek Force.
September 14, 1983
* Streamlining EPA Procurement, Procedures and Processes;
Project Summary of the Procurement Review Task Force - August
1983 EPA
* Recommended Approach for Consolidated Management of the
Agency's ADP Resources, ADP Consolidation Task Force - Feb. 26,
1982
* Regional Support Services Fund Study Findings. February 17,
1982
* Budget Structure and Codes - FY 1983, FY 1984
' FY 1984 RCSA/ Super fund Work-Load Analysis. 28 September 1983 .
• FT 1984 Analysis of Object Class by Program Element. Report
to Office of Management and Budget
• Analysis of Action on FY 1984 Appropriation^m. Office of
the Comptroller, July 12, 1983
' Region II Accomplishments and Goals. FY 1982-1983
' Region II FY 1984 Operating Plan. 10 June 1983
* Region V - Environmental Services Division Activities
Report. 10/26/83
F-74
-------
4. Audit Reports:
* Final Report of EPA'a Portion of the Hazardous Substance Response
Trust Fund as of September 30. 1982. Office of Inspector General,
March 31, 1983
* Review of Che Office of Research and Development's Extramural
Research Actlvltiea. Audit Report. Office of the Inspector
General, March 31, 1983
* Report Co Che Administrator Environmental Protection Agency:
EPA'8 Nev Research Controls; Problems Remain. General Accounting
Office, July 14, 1981
* Promising Changes Improve EPA'a Extramural Research; More
Changes Needed, General Accounting Office, October 28,
1980
* . Accounting and Reporting of Resources Under EPA'a Formal Plan-
ning and Reporting System, Region IV. Office of the Inspector
General, October 22, 1979 . • .
5. Contractor Reports:
* Cost Allocation Feasibility Study for the Superfund Program,
September 1983, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
* Laboratory Information Resources for Research Program Management,
April 13, 1983, Urban Systems Research and Engineering, Inc.
* Integrated Budget Systems Development Functional Requirements,
December 3, 1982 'Electronic Data Systems Corporation
* Integrated Budget Systems Development, Data Element Matrices and
Data Base Evaluation, December 3, 1982.- Electronic Data Systems
Corporation
*' Environmental Protection Agency Strategic Planning Review.
October 6, 1978, Programatlcs, Incorporated
6. External Publications:
Selected Environmental Lav Statutes 1983 Edition. St. Paul Minn.
West Publishing Company, 1983
Revitalizing Federal Management; managers and their overburdened
systems. National Academy of Public Administration, November, 1983
F-75
-------
7. Correspond «nc«;
• Workplan for Review of EPA Statutory Authority, From: Milton
Russell, Assistant Administrator-Designate for Policy, Planning
and Evaluation; To: Deputy Administrator, November 15, 1983
• Development of Operating Year Guidance, for PY 1985 and FT 1986,
Prom Deputy Administrator To Aaaiseane Administrators, Inapector
Ganaral, Aaaoelata Administrators and Regional Adminiatracers,
0 Reorganisation. Proa: Director, Office of Information Resources
Management, To: The Staff, Oct. 27, 1983
0 Minutea from Budget & Management Task Force Proa; Robert Springer,
Region V, October 20, 1983
* Preliminary Working Capital Pond Design Paper, Proa: Roger
Coatea to Edward J. Hanley, Director (MISS, Sept. 23, 1983
• Action Tracking System (ATS). From: Alvin L. Aim, Deputy
Administrator, To: Aaaiatant Administrators, Inapector
General, Associate Administrators, Deputy Regional Administrators,
Office Directors, September 20, 1983
* Streaaling EPA's Management Structure, Proa: Alvin L. Ala,
Deputy Administrator, To: Howard M. Mesaner, Assistant
. Administrator for Administration, September 16, 1983
* Streamlining EPA's Management Structure—Action Memorandum
To: Administrator, September 9, 1983
* ADP Modernization Program for the Environmental Protection Agency;
Prom: Edward J. Hanley, Director, Office of Management Information
and Support Services; To: Assistant Administrators, Associate
•Administrators, Regional Administrators, and Inspector General,
September 9, 1983
* Interim EPA Policy on Microcomputers, Frasttasmammetor, Office of
Management Information and Support Servlcety^w Assistant Admini-
strators, Regional Administrators and Laboratory Directors,
September 9, 1983
* Review of EPA Statutory Authority. Prom: Administrator Rnckelshause,
To: Assistant Administrators, Associate Administrators., Regional
Administrators Inapector General, August 12, 1983
* Deadlines for Submission of PY 1985 Budget Request Material. Prom:
Samuel T. Rondberg, Director, Office of Research Program Management,
To: ORD Office Directors, Program Operations Directors and
Research Committee Chairmen, Jun. 22, 1983
F-76
-------
FY 1985 Budget Beque«t—Technical Call Letter and Final
Targets, From: Special Assistant Co the A'dmlnlstrator,
Tor Asa la tant Administrators and Associate Administrators,
Just. 16, 1983
Ranking Session for ORD FT 1985 Budget, From: Acting
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development, To:
ORD Office Directors, Research Committee Chairmen, and
Program Operations Directors, May 26, 1983
Office of Research and Development (ORD) Process for FT 1985
Budget Formulation, From: Acting Assistant Administrator for
Research and Development, To: ORD Office Directors, ORD
Research Committee Chairmen and Program Operation* Directors,
May 4, 1983
Procedural Changes in Reporting Regional Information Under
the Management Accountability System (MAS), From: Lewis
S. W» Crampton, Director, Office of Management Systems
and Evaluation, To: Assistant Administrators, and Regional
Administrators, March 7, 1983
Reorganization of the Office of Research and Development,
From: Assistant Administrator for Research and Development,
To: Chief of Staff, Office of the Administrator, March 2,
1983
Office of Research and Development Process for FY 1985
Budget Formulation. From: Courtney Riordan, Acting
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development, To:
ORD Office Directors and ORD Research Committee Co-chairmen,
Feb. 25, 1983
F-77
-------
APPENDIX G
-------
APPENDIX G
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDA
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
APPENDIX G
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Number Title
1-H Allowance Issuance and Resources Control
2-G Submission and Processing of
Operating Plan Changes
3-D* Operating Under Continuing Resolution
4-1* Unobligated Carryover Funds
5-D* Funding of Discrimination-Investigations
and Hearings
6-1* Advices .of Allowance for Construction Grants
7-H FY 1984 Appropriations Act
8-F General Provisions Applicable
Governmentwide to Appropriate Funds
9-F* Recovery and Use of Construction Grant Funds
10-J Travel Ceiling and Charging Policies
11-A Management of ADP Funds
12- Obligation of Agency Allowances
13-B Recovery and Overrun of Prior Year Obligations
14-D Regulatory Liaison Group
15-A Reimbursable Agreements
16-B Buildings and Facilities Funds
17-A* Extramural Procurement Plan Development
and Implementation
Date of
Last Issuance
November 19, 1980
March 18, 1980
September 28, 1982
September 13, 1982
March 25, 1981
November 29, 1983
October 7, 1983
November 5, 1979
November 29, 1983
October 4, 1983
December 24, 1975
October 13, 1977
November 25, 1980
June 3, 1981
September 22, 1980
January 16, 1984
July 9, 1982
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual • ' ••• •" 2400
2/1/85
18-A Control Funds by Object Class - April 14, 1980
19-B Full Time Equivalency'Program < .-.:• August 12, 1981
20-A* Limitation on Rate of Obligation '• May 20, 1982
* These Policy and Procedure -Memoranda are included; in the Manual. The
others will be included as they are updated.
-------
Resource Planning and Budgeting Manual
2400
2/1/85
Seven Policy and Procedure Memoranda are included in the Manual at this time:
3-D Operating Under Continuing Resolution
4-1 Unobligated Carryover Funds
5-D Funding of Discrimination-Investigations
and Hearings
6-1 Advices of Allowance for Construction Grants
9-F Recovery and Use of Construction Grant Funds
17-A Extramural Procurement Plan Development
and Implementation
20-A Limitation on Rate of Obligation
September 28, 1982
September 13, 1982
March 25, 1981
November 29,.1983
November 29, 1983
July 9, 1982
May 20, 1982
in
-------
,..lO Sr«,
>* f.t
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
SBP 281982
OFFICE OF
POLICY AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Opgr^ting Under/Continuing Resolution; Issuance of
and Pfcrcedur/
FRO!
rgah. Klfighorn
Comptroller (PM-22
Memorandum //3-D
TO: See Attached Listing
This memorandum sets forth policies and procedures for "Operating Under
Continuing Resolution." This revision supersedes Policy and Procedure Memo-
randum //3-C, dated September 22, 1980.
At this time, we have made only a few editorial changes. Primarily we
are issuing this so you will be aware of its general provisions. We will
update it and/or contact you if any Continuing Resolution for the coming fiscal
year has special language, such as limitations on new starts.
Any inquiries regarding this memorandum and its implementation should be
directed to Vincette Goerl, 382-4176.
Attachment
cc: Morgan Kinghorn
John C. Chamberlin
Liz Milstead
Shirley Keehn
G-l
-------
Distribution List for Policy and Procedure Memorandum
Executive Office, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Director, Office of Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-110)
Director, Office of Civil Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of International. Activities (A-106)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)'
Director, Office of Legislation (A-103) . .
Director, Office of Management Services (A-102)
Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Office of Comptroller (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Planning and Resource Information Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Air, Radiation and Legal Services Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Management Pesticides and Toxic Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund/RCRA Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Water and Construction Grants Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Research and Development Branch (PM-225)
Director, Financial Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Reports and Analysis Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Review and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Associate Administrator for Legal and Enforcement Counsel (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office'of General Counsel (A-130)
Director, Office of Enforcement Policy (A-134)
Assistant Administrator for Administration (PM-208)
Director, Office of Personnel and Organization (PM-208)
Director, Office of Fiscal and Contracts Management (PM-224)
Director, Office of Management Information Support Services (PM-211)
Director, Office of Budget and Control Staff (PM-208)
Assistant Administrator for Water (WH-556)
Director, Office of Water Enforcement (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Program Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (WH-546)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
G-2
-------
-2-
Assistant Administrator for Air, Noise and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air, Noise and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339)
Director, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control (ANR-455)
Director, Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ANR-471C)
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C) .
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (ANR-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-788)
Director, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances Enforcement (EN-342)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Office of Research Program Management (RD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689)
Director, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Director, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-681)
Director, Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-682)
Director, Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Director, Support Services Office, 26 West St. Clair Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Support Services Office/ORD, (MD-50) Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park,
N.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigations, Denver, Colorado 80225
Director, Technical Support Division, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Motor Vehicle Emission Test Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48105
Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory/ORD, (MD 59) Research Triangle Park,
N.C. 27711
Financial Management Officer, Accounting Operations Office, (PM-226)
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26 West
St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Box 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 98114
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, (MD-75) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Monitoring & Systems Lab, Cin., Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, Las Vegas, Nevada
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab/ORD, (MD-60), Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office/ORD, (MD-52) Research
Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessement Office, Cincinnati, OH. 45268
Director, Health Effects Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab, Ada, Oklahoma
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Georgia 30613
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Corvallis, Oregon 97333
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Duluth, Minnesota 55804
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Narragansett, R.I. 02882
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
G-3
-------
-3-
Regional Administrator, Region 1, Boston
Regional Administrator, Region 2, New York
Regional Administrator, Region 3, Philadelphia
Regional Administrator, Region 4, Atlanta
Regional Administrator, Region 5, Chicago
Regional Administrator, Region 6, Dallas
Regional Administrator, Region 7, Kansas City
Regional Administrator, Region 8, Denver
Regional Administrator, Region 9, San Francisco
Regional Administrator, Region 10, Seattle
Director, Administrative Services Division, Region 1
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management, Regions 2,3,4,6,7,8 & 9
Director, Planning and Management Division, Region 5 '
Director, Management -Division, Region 10
Financial Management Officer, Regions 1,2,4,5,8 & 10
Comptroller, Regions 3,6,7 & 9
Senior Budget Officers
G-4
-------
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDUM //3-D
Operating Under Continuing Resolution
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this guide is to define and explain the purpose, back-
ground, legal constraints, and the policies and procedures of operating under
a Continuing Resolution in the Environmental Protection Agency.
II. DEFINITION
A Continuing Resolution is a joint resolution by the Congress, enacted
as law for a specific period of time, which authorizes the obligation and
expenditure of funds pending the enactment of an Appropriation Act.
III. BACKGROUND
Some appropriations are not passed by the Congress until several
months after the beginning of the fiscal year on October 1. To maintain
operations in the interim period, a Continuing Resolution is passed, the
thrust of which is to keep the Federal Government functioning on a minimal
basis until funds for the full year are determined by the Congress. Existing
projects and activities are contained at the lowest of one of three rates as
explained in paragraph IV. C. Since the resolution does not enumerate specific
amounts that may be obligated or expended during the time period covered by
the resolution, such amounts must be determined by each Federal agency.
The Continuing Resolution is an interim substitute for the apportion-
ment process which occurs after an appropriation is enacted. In operating
under the resolution, the legal responsibilities for over-obligation deficien-
cies are the same as under the basic law on the apportionment of funds, Section
3679, Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C. 665(c)(l) and (e)(2).
In general, operation under the resolution applies only to accounts
with current fiscal year budget authority. Advances and reimbursements, trust
funds, and revolving funds are excluded; also excluded are the obligation of
carryover funds appropriated in previous fiscal years.
IV. PROVISIONS OF CONTINUING RESOLUTION
A. Constraints on New Program Activities
Only existing budget programs or activities may be continued unless
specifically mentioned otherwise in the Continuing Resolution. An existing
program is defined as one that was performed in the previous fiscal year and
which is included in the current budget before the Congress.
G-5
-------
-2-
New programs that are in the current fiscal year budget pending before
the Congress may not be initiated. Such initiation is a legal violation.
Activities that may have been performed in previous fiscal years, but were not
performed in the immediate past fiscal year, are considered new programs and
may not be resumed.
The constraint on initiating new programs is in effect even when both
the House and the Senate bills have provided funds for such new activities.
New programs may be initiated only after EPA's appropriation bill becomes a
law or the Continuing Resolution expressly states that the Agency may proceed.
B. Constraints on Employment
Although the Continuing Resolution does not specifically direct itself
to employment levels, it is Agency policy that workyear ceilings for existing
activities will be based on the proposed operating plan or the past fiscal
year, whichever is the lower.
Full-time equivalent workyears associated with new activities cannot be
filled unless the Continuing Resolution contains specific language stating that
the Agency may proceed to initiate new activities.
Interim employment ceilings for the period of the Resolution will be
determined by the Agency.
C. Operating Rates for Existing Activities
In those instances where neither House has passed a bill, the operating
rate will be either the rate in the budget estimate or the past fiscal year
rate, whichever is the lower.
In those instances where a bill has passed only one House, the operating
rate will be either the rate permitted by the one House or the past fiscal year
rate, whichever is the lower.
In those instances where a bill has passed both Houses with different
amounts, but has not cleared the Conference Committee, the operating rate will
be either the rate of the more restrictive authority or the past fiscal year
rate, whichever is the lower.
In those instances where authorization language expired with the close
of the previous fiscal year, but the Administration has proposed extensions
which have not been enacted by the Congress, activities may continue so long
as they were carried out and are at the same rate of obligation as in the past
fiscal year. They may also continue if budget proposals for the new fiscal
year are less than for the past fiscal year.
G-6
-------
-3-
V.
DETERMINATION OF AMOUNTS
The Office of the Comptroller will have the responsibility for deter-
mining the amount of funds required by the Agency during the period covered by
the Continuing Resolution. The Resources Management Information System will
be utilized as the base for such determination. The quarterly Operating Plan
distribution will be reviewed at the Allowance Holder/Program Element level
to determine any adjustments necessary for grant and contract estimates and
Agency support changes. The period covered by the Continuing Resolution is
the determining factor of the rate (percentage or other) utilized when review-
ing the quarterly requirements. Continuing Resolution funds will be issued to
Allowance Holders in an Advice of Allowance. If an Allowance Holder determines
that funds are inadequate, he will contact the Office of the Comptroller.
VI. SAVINGS PROVISION
From time to time, the Office of the Comptroller may find it necessary
to withhold, withdraw, or place additional constraints or controls on allowances
issued under the foregoing policies and procedures in order to comply with
provisions of authorizing or appropriating legislation, directives of the
Office of Management and Budget, or other external requirements.
SEP 281982
Date
C. Mofrgan Kingh
/Cpmptrolle
G-7
-------
G-8
-------
sr%
\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
/ WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
•P I 3 1982
OFFICE OF
POLICY AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: FY 1983 Carryover Analysis: Issuance of Policy and Procedure
MemorAdum #4-1
FROM:
Comptroller (PM-2&J)
TO: See Attached Listing
This memorandum briefly reviews EPA's FY 1982 Year-End Closing process
arid forwards our revised Policy and Procedure Memorandum #4-1 entitled
"Carryover Funds". This revision supersedes Policy and Procedure Memorandum
#4-H dated October 14, 1980.
REVISED CARRYOVER POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
We have revised and updated Policy and Procedure Memorandum #4-1 to
address the Superfund appropriation and to clarify procedures for requesting
carryover for all appropriations.
Superfund - Superfund unobligated balances, which are no-year appropri-
ation funds, will be treated as uncommitted/unreserved carryover in the new
fiscal year. We will ask you to request and provide narrative justification
for your FY 1982 commitments against the Superfund appropriation in order for
those funds to be reissued to your allowance. Generally, in the Superfund
appropriation, unobligated balances in administrative object classes (other
than contracts, grants and interagency agreements) will not be reissued but
will be reprogrammed into a site response contingency reserve. Carryover
requests for funds in administrative object classes will be considered sub-
ject to the need to remain within administrative ceilings established by
Congress in our FY 1982 Appropriation Bill (Public Law 96-510) and any sub-
sequent appropriation bills with that provision.
Request Forms - A change request form (OP-2B, attached) is required
with your request for committed, reserved, and uncommitted/unreserved carry-
over as a means of formalizing what has been requested and providing the
necessary detail to issue your request in an Allowance. Change request
forms must provide a narrative explanation and should be grouped as commit-
ted, reserved, or uncommitted/unreserved requests.
G-9
-------
-2-
End-of-Year Analysis - The Office of the Comptroller will be using the
analysis of each Allowance Holder's FY 1982 End-of-Year performance (planned
vs. obligated) as one of our key criteria in allocating carryover funds in
FY 1983. Additional criteria will include changing Agency-wide program
priorities and the ability of the Allowance Holder to obligate funds in a
timely fashion.
FY 1982 YEAR-END CLOSING SCHEDULE HIGHLIGHTS
On August 11 a memorandum entitled "Fiscal Year 1982 Year-End Closing"
was issued by the Financial Management Division to each Financial Management
Officer detailing a schedule and instructions to assure that all assignments
and dates are clearly understood. I would like to highlight certain aspects
of this Year-End Closing process that have direct correlation to our
analysis of carryover.
September 22
September 30
October 4
October 6-13
Final change requests are due for EPA's
September 30 FY 1982 Operating Plan. No
changes will be accepted after this date.
The September 30 Operating Plan will be
used as the base for comparison in the
Financial Management System's (FMS's)
12th and 13th month reports.
Closing date for Fiscal Year 1982.
The Servicing Finance Office will provide
a copy of the 12th month Document Control
Register to Allowance Holders. Each
Allowance Holder must review this report
(RCM-4) and prepare a listing of exceptions,
with supporting documentation, representing
needed additions, deletions or posting
errors.
Adjustments to the 12th month report should
be sent by each Allowance Holder to their
Servicing Finance Office during this period
for the preparation of the final 13th month
report. There can be no extension to this
schedule, so please allow sufficient time to
research and post your adjustments.
The Office of the Comptroller and the
Financial Management Division have agreed
that there will be no pen and ink corrections
after the close of the 13th month so your
careful review, at this point, is the key to
the year-end certification process.
G-10
-------
-3-
October 19 13th month final report data will be available
and may be accessed by the Financial
Management Officers. Based on this report
the Office of the Comptroller will determine
the total amount of unobligated funds available
for reapportionment to the Agency.
November 2 All requests for carryover funds from the
Program and Regional Offices are due to the
Comptroller, and should be delivered to
Rick Peterson, Room 700, by COB for review
and initial issuance of FY 1983 carryover
funds. Please use P&PM #4-1 as your
guidance for submission requirements.
November 30 An analysis of End-of-Year performance,
review and decision on requests for carryover
funds, and issuance of carryover Advices of
Allowance are targeted to be completed during
the month of November.
I believe that with your cooperation and compliance with the requirements
of this memorandum and its attachments, carryover funds will be reissued as
quickly as possible and will allow for maximum utilization of these funds in
FY 1983.
Please call Rick Peterson at 382-4212 if you have any questions on the
requirements or contents of this process or memorandum.
Attachments
G-H
-------
Distribution List for Policy and Procedure Memorandum
Executive Office, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Director, Office of Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-110)
Director, Office of Civil Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of International Activities (A-106)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)
Director, Office of Legislation (A-103)
Director, Office of Management Services (A-102)
Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Office of Comptroller (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Planning and Resource Information Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Air, Radiation and Legal Services Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Management Pesticides and Toxic Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund/RCRA Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Water and Construction Grants Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Research and Development Branch (PM-225)
Director, Financial Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Reports and Analysis Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Review and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Associate Administrator for Legal and Enforcement Counsel (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office of General Counsel (A-130)
Director, Office of Enforcement Policy (A-134)
Assistant Administrator for Administration (PM-208)
Director, Office of Personnel and Organization (PM-208)
Director, Office of Fiscal and Contracts Management (PM-224)
Director, Office of Management Information Support Services (PM-211)
Director, Office of Budget and Control Staff (PM-208)
Assistant Administrator for Water (WH-556)
Director, Office of Water Enforcement (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Program Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (WH-546)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
G-12
-------
-2-
Assistant Administrator for Air, Noise and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air, Noise and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339)
Director, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control (ANR-455)
Director, Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ANR-471C)
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C)
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (ANR'-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-788)
Director, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances Enforcement (EN-342)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Office of Research Program Management (RD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689) •
Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-681)
Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-682)
Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Support Services Office, 26 West St. Clair Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Support Services Office/ORD, (MD-50) Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
N.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigations, Denver, Colorado 80225
Director, Technical Support Division, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Motor Vehicle Emission Test Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48105
Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory/ORD, (MD 59) Research Triangle Park,
N.C. 27711
Financial Management Officer, Accounting Operations Office, (PM-226)
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26 West
St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Box 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 98114
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, (MD-75) Research Triangle
C. 27711
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Monitoring
Industrial Environmental
C. 27711
Industrial Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office/ORD, (MD-52)
Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessement Office, Cincinnati
Health Effects Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park
Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab, Ada, Oklahoma
Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Georgia 30613
Corvallis, Oregon 97333
Duluth, Minnesota 55804
Narragansett, R.I. 02882
Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
Park, N.
Director,
Director,
Director,
Park, N.
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
& Systems Lab, Cin., Ohio 45268
Systems Lab/ORD, Las Vegas, Nevada
Research Lab/ORD, (MD-60), Research Triangle
Ohio 45268
Research
OH.
N.C.
45268
27711
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Director, Environmental
Research
Research
Research
Research
Lab,
Lab,
Lab,
Lab,
G-13
-------
-3-
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Director,
Assistant
Director,
Director,
Financial
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region 8,
Kegion 9,
Region 10,
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
Administrative Services
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Atlanta
Chicago
Dallas
Kansas City
Denver
San Francisco
Seattle
Division,
Region 1
Regional Administrator for Policy and Management, Regions .2,3,4,6,7,8 & 9
Planning and Management Division, Region 5
Management Division, Region 10
Management Officer, Regions 1,2,4,5,8 & 10
Comptroller, Regions 3,6,7
Senior Budget Officers
G-14
-------
REQUEST FOR CAr!WTvER FUNDS
OPERATING PLAN
FORM OP-IB
CHANGE REQUEST/NOTIFICATION - FUNDING/WORKYEARS
BOD USE ONLY
ORIC CHANCE NO.
1-2 J-IS
TO:
Office of the Comptroller (PM-225)
SF
RU
CN
eo
7
-
P.E. NUMBER
II . 1 A
o
Ul
AH
LL
L8
15-16
RC
17
AA
PU
PT
RH
18-19
LCL
10-21
A 1
CO
TN
12
OC
BL
23-24
OBJECT CLASSES
21 PFT 48 Equipment
23 OPFT 49 Land & Structural
26 PFTE 60 Insurance
27 OPFTE . 60 R & O Contracts
41 Part Comp & Ban 61 IAG
42 Tr«\ al & Trantp 62 Program Contract!
Part 63 ADP Contract
43 Trinip of Thins* Sarvlca»
44 Rant Commun & 70 Rausrch Qranti
Repro 71 Demo Grant*
45 Printing & Rapro 72 Qranti to State*.
46 Other Contr InM'nt & Local
Service* Govarnmentt
47 Supplle* & 73 Other Grtt (Trg
Material* Fttlowihlpi)
FROM:
DATE
RESOURCES PROGRAMMING (All txctpt SHADED column, mu.f be lilted)
CURRENT FY QUARTERS
FIRST
33-40
SECOND
41-48
THIRD
49-S6
FOURTH
57-84
CURRENT YEAR
TOTAL
FY
••' -'j;' :'>••: •--;•• > ••<;.: -
^Ift^f^yJv'
.;<•.}- •*•'-.'• v^-.j^ .*•* 5 :*.>/-"-„
;*%>•-}• ---j . *„*&.* •-; : ~.\'~- -
^&$$fc£j$£»:
^SA}v>••SSf •''••^5;*l'--'
'• ^tfe^iS^^l** * *$$3&.-i
*«-W4* ^ >i4i^ ' % '• ^fc 'i^?:*^
;S^p3^S*Ji|^-.»f .'-: •
.p.'iv*f.!*>iSvi-,f, •:••: •;',«;;, - s
'J'S??.-S •'•>^.V'->."-'-' , i"^"'- - -•
yi-'!$$&v-ij$£':* - "'. t -.:
"S^SSSIPlifefii
mi^m-^:-
^^J:|fei^^i4feJ!'|:;'
/f^^llfcg
!»f;
•>::
y*:
f
it
*
.-r
\s
::*'
i^.
:«.
*<
%
Y:
1
1
1
PAGE
O-F
EFFECTIVE DATE OF
REPROGRAMMING
BUDGET YEAR
TOTAL
FY
65-72 ,
PURPOSE/STIPULATIONS
PA Form 2410-20 (Rev. 7-82) Prevlou* edition li obiolete.
-------
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDUM #4-1
Carryover Funds
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to set forth Agency policies and proce-
dures for utilizing unobligated funds to be carried over from one fiscal year
into the next fiscal year. These policies and procedures apply to all two-year
fund appropriations and all no-year fund appropriations, with the exception of
Construction Grants. This memorandum supersedes Policy and Procedure Memorandum
/M-H dated October 14, 1980.
II. DEFINITIONS
Carryover Funds are funds that are not obligated by the end of a fiscal
year and which may be obligated in the next fiscal year. They include unobligated
balances in no-year and two-year appropriations. The three types of carryover
funds are committed, reserved, and uncommitted/unreserved.
One-year (Annual) Appropriation is an appropriation which is available for
obligation within only one fiscal year and which expires for this purpose on
September 30. Salaries and Expenses is a one-year appropriation.
Two-year (or multiple-year) Appropriation is an appropriation which is
available for obligation for a specified period of time in excess of one year.
Abatement, Control and Compliance and Research and Development are two-year
appropriations.
No-year Appropriation is an appropriation which is available until
expended, rescinded, or otherwise withdrawn. Superfund and Buildings and
Facilities are no-year appropriations.
Prior fiscal year is the fiscal year from which unobligated funds are
available at the close of that year (September 30) and may be carried over for
obligation in the next fiscal year.
Current fiscal year is the fiscal year in which the Agency is operating.
Commitments are the reservation of funds for specific projects or
services to be procured. The term refers to funds which are certified as avail-
able by the Allowance Holder; which have been submitted to the Servicing Finance
Office for obligation processing; and which have been entered in the Financial
Management System (FMS) prior to formal obligation.
Obligations are the result of executed contracts or other legal promises
to lease, purchase and/or deliver real property or services. Obligations occur
when contracts or other legal documents are signed by the parties involved, and
submitted to financial management for recording and official designation of funds
in accordance with the terms of the contract. A contract or other document is
referred to as an obligating document.
G-16
-------
-2-
Responsible Planning and Implementation Officers (RPIOs) are Agency top
managers who are responsible for the review, control and management over programs
and resources assigned to them and for compliance with requirements related to
the overall planning and budgeting process. They develop, submit and implement
their own Annual Operating Plan. The Chief of Staff, Associate Administrators,
and Assistant Administrators serve as RPIOs over the Allowance Holders within
their respective offices. Regional Administrators, in addition to the above,
serve as both RPIOs and Allowance Holders.
Allowance Holders are EPA managers who are responsible for implementing a
part of the Agency's Annual Operating Plan and for reporting on the progress of
the program and the budget. They manage allowances which are a. portion of the
Agency's resources used to finance specific parts of the Annual Operating Plan.
Allowance Holders report to their Responsible Planning and Implementation Officer
for program resources and the preparation, implementation, and submission of the
Annual Operating Plan. The Chief of Staff, Regional Administrators, Associate
Administrators, and Assistant Administrators are both Allowance Holders and
RPIOs. All other Allowance Holders serve under a RPIO.
III. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
A. General
All Advices of Allowance issued during the prior fiscal year will expire
as of the close of business on September 30 of that year. Obligations against
these expired allowances will not be permitted. Funds appropriated annually for
one year and funds appropriated for two or more years, for which the period of
availability ended on September 30 are expired funds and cannot be carried over
or obligated after that date. The unobligated balances under the two-year and
no-year appropriations will be carried over into the current fiscal year and
represent the total carryover funds available.
At the beginning of October, the Financial Management Division will provide
Allowance Holders with a Document Control Register (12th month preliminary RCM-4
report) which lists all commitments and obligations through September 30 that
have been received by finance offices and entered into the Financial Management
System. The Allowance Holder must review this report and prepare a listing of
exceptions, with supporting documentation, representing needed additions, dele-
tions, or posting errors. This list must be received by the Servicing Finance
Office and by the RPIO, by a scheduled date, in time to be posted prior to the
final 13th month update. The updated report, together with a statement signed
by the Allowance Holder, will serve as the official year-end certification to
the Office of the Comptroller for the purpose of determining carryover.
G-17
-------
-3-
The Office of the Comptroller and the Financial Management Division have
agreed that there will be no pen and ink corrections for duplicate or unrecord-
ed obligations after the close of the 13th month. Items of this kind will be
treated as overruns and recoveries in the next fiscal year and will require
request for approval from the Comptroller.
During the first 45 days of the new fiscal year, the Office»of the Comp-
troller will: (1) determine and validate the total carryover funds; (2) determine
that portion of these funds which is committed, reserved, or uncommitted/unre-
served; (3) identify, with the assistance of Program and Regional Offices, any
and all of the previously approved planned uses of these funds; (4) review prior
fiscal year performance verses operating plan for each Allowance Holder at the
program level; and, (5) solicit carryover requests from the Program and Regional
Offices in the form of change requests (Form OP-2B) with justification. A
change request form is required for committed, reserved, and uncommitted/unre-
served carryover as a means of formalizing what has been requested and providing
the necessary data input codes to grant your requests.
A cut-off date for carryover requests will be established and the Comp-
troller's office will review these submissions in terms of fund availability,
critical needs, and Agency priorities. First priority will be given to
reissuance of committed and reserved carryover to the original Allowance Holder
whenever ample justification is provided. To the extent that carryover funds
exceed the amounts justified for use by the original Allowance Holder, they will
by used to fund other proposed Agency priorities. Some requests may require a
decision by the Administrator. Until funds are specifically provided in
Allowances or by memorandum from the Comptroller, no funds will be obligated by
Allowance Holders in any carryover appropriation accounts.
Situations may arise in which the Agency's total high priority requests
will exceed funds available. In such circumstances, the original Allowance
Holder may not receive any or all of the carryover funds for which a priority
justification was submitted.
Following an analysis and decision on requests, the Comptroller will
issue carryover funds in a new Advice of Allowance which may only be used in the
current fiscal year for funding grants, contracts and procurement requests.
Carryover funds cannot be used for personnel compensation and benefits or for
travel, unless specifically approved in advance by the Comptroller for such pur-
poses. In the event that we do not have an appropriation at the start of the
current fiscal year, additional guidance will be issued regarding these
constraints.
B. Specific
1. Committed Carryover funds are unobligated balances for which a com-
mitment was recorded in the Financial Management System, and for which a
sufficient unobligated balance existed, as of September 30.
G-18
-------
-4-
The Allowance Holder is responsible for assuring that all grant and
contract commitments are properly recorded in the Financial Management System
year-end reports. In addition, these commitments must represent a procurement
request against which an obligation will be made following completion of pro-
cessing and award of associated contracts by the Procurements and Contracts
Management Division, or a grant action against which an obligation will be made
following completion of processing and award of associated grants by the Grants
Administration Division. Any commitments not supported by procurement requests
or requests for grant action will not be funded. The Allowance Holder must
ensure that commitments are charged to the proper object class and that the
object class is applicable to the appropriation being charged.
The Office of the-Comptroller will review the commitment listing and
negotiate reductions in commitments if insufficient funds to cover the commit-
ment existed in the expired Allowance before issuing new Advices of Allowance
for carryover funds. This certified listing will be the official document used
by the Office of the Comptroller as the major basis for issuing committed carry-
over funds.
For any carryover funds issued the Allowance Holder is responsible for
assuring that all obligation document charges to the new fiscal year carryover
funds cite the new fiscal year account number but the same document control
number for those purchase requisitions and grant actions which were not obli-
gated by September 30. All approved commitments for carryover must be coded
with the new account number and the old document control number.
At Mid-Year review, any committed carryover funds which were recorded in
the Financial Management System on the previous September 30 and are still un-
obligated as of March 31 will be withdrawn and reissued for other Agency needs.
To retain these funds, justification should be submitted to the Office of the
Comptroller by April 5 and that justification should include an explanation as
to why the funds have not been obligated and why they are still needed.
To request committed carryover funds the following steps need to be
fulfilled:
A. The commitment must be certified as valid by the Allowance Holder
and appear on the 13th month report.
B. A sufficient unobligated balance must exist in the expired Allowance
to fund the commitment.
C. A Change Request Form (OP-2B) is submitted requesting the funds
as carryover. A narrative description of the committed item must
be included on the Change Request Form.
G-19
-------
-5-
D. No other justification is required to request committed carryover for
a two-year appropriation or the Buildings and Facilities appropriation.
Carryover requests to cover commitments against no-year appropriation
funds, including Superfund, require a narrative justification.
2. Reserved Carryover funds are unobligated balances from the prior
fiscal year which are identified and held available for use only for the purpose
for which they were originally intended. These balances are carried over and
reserved for their same purpose at the end of each fiscal year, and will be
available for obligation following the issuance of a carryover Advice of Allow-
ance and a new account number, as soon as possible after the start of the new
fiscal year.
The following Abatement, Control and Compliance program elements are
carried over and considered reserved to protect their availability for funding
the same type of grants in the new fiscal year:
NOA CODE PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE
B17A2C Control Agency Resource Supplemen-
tation (105 Grants)
B42B2A Great Lakes Program
B43B2A Clean Lakes Program
B47B2C Control Agency Resource Supplemen-
tation (106 Grants)
B65C2C Public Water System Supervision
Program Grants
B66C2C Underground Injection Control
Program Grants
B67C2C Special Studies and Demonstrations
B77D2C Hazardous Waste Management Financial
Assistance
B8XE3A Pesticides Certification and Training
BFJE3A Pesticides Enforcement Grants
B8TL3A Toxic Substances Enforcement Grants
CARRYOVER CODE
J17A2C
J42B2A
J43B2A
J47C2C
J65C2C
J66C2C
J67C2C
J77D2C
J8XE3A
JFJE3A
J8TL3A
The following program elements which represent the entire unobligated
balance in the Buildings and Facilities appropriation will be carried over and
considered reserved:
NOA CODE PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE
D4KM4A New Facilities
D4JP4A Repairs and Improvements
CARRYOVER CODE
N4KM4A
N4JP4A
To request reserved carryover funds you need only to submit a Change
Request Form (OP-2B) requesting the funds as carryover.
G-20
-------
-6-
3. Uncommitted/Unreserved Carryover funds are unobligated balances from
the prior fiscal year which are neither committed or reserved pursuant to the
foregoing requirements. All funds from no-year appropriations fall into this
category (except Buildings and Facilities). Any no-year appropriation, includ-
ing Superfund, must be rejustified in order to be issued a carryover Advice of
Allowance for those funds.
Generally, in the Superfund appropriation, unobligated balances in
administrative object classes (other that contracts, grants and interagency
agreements) will not be reissued but will be reprogrammed into a site response
contingency reserve. Carryover requests for funds in administrative object
classes will be considered subject to the need to remain within, administrative
ceilings established by Congress in our FY 1982 Appropriation Bill (Public Law
96-510) and any subsequent appropriation bills with that provision.
The Office of the Comptroller will solicit possible uses for uncommitted
carryover funds as outlined in the preceding "General Policy" section. Deci-
sions and approval of carryover requests will be followed by the issuance of an
approved operating plan and carryover Advices of Allowance.
During the interim between the start of the new fiscal year and the
issuance of carryover allowances, no obligations will be permitted against uncom-
mitted carryover funds.
To request uncommitted/unreserved carryover funds the following steps
need to be fulfilled:
A. A Change Request Form (OP-2B) is submitted requesting the funds
as carryover.
B. Full justification, purpose, and supporting memorandum must be pro-
vided for each request.
IV. SAVINGS PROVISION
From time to time, the Office of the Comptroller may find it necessary to
withhold, withdraw, or place additional constraints or controls on carryover fund
allowances issued under the foregoing policies and procedures in order to comply
with provisions of authorizing or appropriating legislation, directives of the
Office of Management and Budget or other external requirements.
1982 { ^ //!' 'lA^
Date —^ C. ^Morgaa/Kinghorn
Comrfttoller
G-21
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
: 25 MAR 1981
SUBJECT: Policy and Procedure Memorandum #5-D
FROM: c.
Deputy(Aewtstat^9Km\inistrator for Resources Management (PM-224)
T0: See Attached Listing
•Attached is the subject memorandum which supersedes Policy and
Procedure Memorandum #5-C, dated January 12, 1978.
Section V has been revised to provide information on the payment
of attorney's Fees.
Attachment
EPA Form 1320-t (Rev. 3-76)
G-23
-------
Office of Resources Management
Policy and Procedure Memorandum Number 5-D
Funding of Discrimination Complaints Investigations, and Hearings
I. Purpose
This Memorandum specifies policy and funding responsibilities
concerning discrimination investigations and hearings.
II. Definition
A discrimination complaint is an allegation in writing signed
by an employee or an applicant, stating he/she has been subjected to
unjust treatment in employment matters coming within EPA's juris-
diction because of his/her race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, or age (40 through 64), after said person has had an oppor-
tunity to discuss his/her grievance with an Equal Employment
Counselor and resolution satisfactory to the complainant has not
been obtained.
Ill. Legal Background
Discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, or age in all personnel actions affecting employees or
applicants for employment (except with regard to aliens employed
outside the limits of the United States) is prohibited by Public
Law 92-261 (the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972), which
amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Public Law
93-259, which extended the coverage of the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967.
IV. Investigations
When a complaint of alleged discrimination has been accepted
on behalf of the Agency at Headquarters EPA by the Director of
Office of Civil Rights or in the regions, by the Regional Director
of Office of Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, or in the laboratories,
by the Area Director of Equal Employment Opportunity, that official
must arrange to have the complaint investigated within five days
from the date of acceptance.
Generally, complaints of discrimination will be investigated
by EEO Investigators from the Office of Civil Rights at Headquarters
EPA. On occasion, it will be necessary to request that the Office
of Personnel Management or another Federal Agency assign an EEO
Investigator to investigate one of EPA's complaints of discrimination
G-24
-------
-2-
When another Federal Agency furnishes an EEO Investigator, all
expenses incurred in the investigation, including travel
expenses, will be paid by the Office of Civil Rights. The
Office of Civil Rights will also pay.all expenses incurred by
EEO Investigators assigned to conduct the investigation.
V. Hearings
When a formal complaint is not adjusted to the satisfaction
of the complainant, he/she may request a hearing. A hearing must
be conducted by a Complaints Examiner from a Federal Agency
other than EPA. This other agency must be reimbursed, as
authorized by 31 U.S.C. 686, for the time spent by the Complaints
Examiner in conducting the hearing and for all related expenses
connected with the hearing, including the preparation of the
recommended decision. The hearing costs, and any court costs or
Appeal Review Board costs will be paid by the Office of Civil
Rights.
Award of Attorney Fees
When an allegation of discrimination prohibited by Section
717 of Title VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964, as amended,
is resolved in favor of the complainant, EPA's Office of Civil
Rights may award a complainant reasonable attorney's fees and
costs, in accordance with Equal Employment Opportunity
Management Directive EEO-MD 105, dated April 11, 1980. This
type of cost will be provided for under the special fund
established within the EPA Office of Civil Rights entitled,
Civil Rights Investigations.
C. William Carter
Deputy Assistant Administrator
for Resources Management
G-25
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
! 5
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATION
AND RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
Policy and Procedure Memorandum #6-1
"Ad-vlcea of Allpwancar ror Construction Grants'
ComptrolUj (PM-223)
v
See Attached Listing
I have attached, for your information and guidance, revised Policy and
Procedure Memorandum #6-1 "Advices of Allowance for Construction Grants."
This memorandum supersedes Policy and Procedure Memorandum //6-H dated
November 29, 1983.
We have revised this Policy and Procedure Memorandum to show the new
program element codes for the FY 1985 Construction Grant allowances in
addition to prior year codes.
If you have any questions on the content of this memorandum, please
contact Donna Carmical (382-4209) of my staff.
Attachment
G-27
-------
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDUM #6-I
Advices of Allowance for Construction Grants
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to set forth Agency policy and proce-
dures for the issuance and control of construction grants allowances. This
policy applies to all construction grants funds—budget authority, contract
authority, and appropriations to liquidate contract authority—for prior
fiscal years as well as the current fiscal year. It also sets forth the
Agency policy that construction grant awards be made from any allotment
which expires before any other available allotted funds. This memorandum
supersedes Policy and Procedure Memorandum #6-H, issued on November 29, 1983.
II. DEFINITIONS
Prior fiscal year is the fiscal year from which unobligated funds
are available at the close of that year (September 30) and may be carried
over for obligation in the next fiscal year.
Current fiscal year is the fiscal year in which the Agency is oper-
ating.
Advices of Allowance represent that portion of the Agency's allotment
assigned to an Allowance Holder to incur obligations for financing his
part of the total program. As a general rule, construction grant allowances
for obligational purposes are issued at the beginning of the fiscal year
for the total fiscal year amount. The allowances for all contract authority,
the Public Works Employment Act budget authority, the 1977 budget authority
and ensuing years budget authority are issued at the regional level with a
State-by-State allocation included within each allowance. The Advices of
Allowance for the 1972 and prior appropriation years, encompassing fiscal
years 1967 through 1972 inclusive, are issued at the regional level and
the Regional Administrator determines the State-by-state allocation. The
allowances to fund reimbursable projects are also issued at the regional
level.
Availability is the period for which funds are usable for obligation
purposes. Construction grant funds are covered by a no-year (X) appropri-
ation which is available for obligation until expended.
Budget Authority for any year represents the authority becoming avail-
able during the year to incur obligations. Most budget authority is in
the form of appropriations, which also provide liquidating cash authority.
Contract authority is a statutory authority under which contracts or
other obligations may be entered into prior to the enactment of an appro-
priation (liquidating cash) for the payment of such obligations.
G-28
-------
Appropriations to liquidate contract authority represent funding for
the paynent of obligations incurred under contract authority. The contract
authority program was fully funded upon receipt of the FY 1982 appropriation
authorized by P.L. 97-101, dated December 23, 1981.
Reallotment is the redistribution of unobligated balances remaining in
accounts of individual States at the end of the initial allotment period of
a specific program year in accordance with Section 205 of the Clean Water
Act, as amended.
III. GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
A. Advices of Allowance
Advices of Allowance issued during a fiscal year expire as of .the close-
of-business on September 30 of that year.
The unobligated funds in the expired allowances as reflected in the of-
ficial accounting records will be treated as carryover funds. In order that
grant awards are not held up pending receipt of new carryover allowances,
obligations may be processed up to the amount of funds estimated to be un-
obligated, identified with the current fiscal year account numbers that are
assigned by the Financial Management Division.
A symbol and code structure for the Construction Grants appropriation
has been established to identify the funding sources for the appropriation.
The appropriation suffixes and the related program element numbers listed
below identify the budget authority and/or contract authority for the various
years which are available in FY 1985.
Program
Element
Title
FY 1985 Program, New Authority, Appropriation 68X0103.H
GMAW80
GMBW80
GMCW80
GMDW80
GMEW80
GMFW80
GMGW80
GMHW80
6NJW80
Construction Grants (CG)
CG, State Management Assistance
CG, Innovative Technology
CG, Alternative Technology
CG, Small Communities
CG, Advance of Allowance
CG, Water Quality Planning
CG, Combined Sewer Overflow
CG, Marine Bay & Estuary Special
FY 1984 Program, Carryover into FY 1985, Appropriation 68X0103.G
GLAW80
GLBW80
GLCW80
GLDW80
GLEW80
GLFW80
GLGW80
GLHW80
Construction Grants
CG, State Management Assistance
CG, Innovative Technology
CG, Alternative Technology
CG, Small Communities
CG, Advance of Allowance
CG, Water Quality Planning
CG, Combined Sewer Overflow
G-29
-------
Program
Element Title
Prior Years. Carryover into FY 1985
GKAW80 - CG, FY 1983, Appropriation 68X0103.F
GHHW80 - GC, FY 1982, Appropriation 68X0103.E
GDJW80 - CG, FY 1981, Appropriation 68X0103.D
GHNW80 - CG, FY 1980, Appropriation 68X0103.C
GHPW80 - CG, FY 1979, Appropriation 68X0103.B
GHQW80 - CG, FY 1978, Appropriation 68X0103.A
GHRW80 - CG, FY 1977, Appropriation 68X0103.9
G7DW80 - CG, Public Works Employment Act, Appropriation 68X0103.8
GHSW80 - CG, Contract Authority Appropriation 68X0103.7
G7BW80 - CG, Reimbursable Program, Appropriation 68X0103.3
G7AW80 - CG, PL 84-660 Program, Appropriation 68X0103.2
Documents transmitted to the Treasury Disbursing Offices should not
show the suffix after the appropriation (68X0103.2) but should show only
the Treasury designation 68X0103.
New budget authority and the carryover funds will be issued during
the current fiscal year in the applicable program element number cited
above. Allowances for FY 1984 resources will be issued in GLAW80 and
FY 1985 funds will be issued in GMAW80.
Amounts deobligated in the current year, which relate to obligations
made during prior years, may not be reobligated until funds are issued
in a current fiscal year carryover allowance which authorizes the funds
(Policy and Procedure Memorandum # 9-F).
You should refer to Sections 201 and 205 of the Clean Water Act, as
amended, with regard to the following programs:
State Management Assistance Section 205(g)
Innovative Technology Section 205(i)
Alternative Technology Section 205(i)
Small Communities Section 205(h)
Advance of Allowance Section 201(1)
Water Quality Planning Section 205(j)
Combined Sewer Overflow Section 201(n)
B. Reallotment
Advices of Allowance for Construction Grants now contain the date
funds are subject to reallotment. Grant awards should be made from those
funds which would first be subject to reallotment unless a State otherwise
specifically directs.
If grant awards have been made on any other basis (e.g., first in,
first out), these should be reviewed. If appropriate, a grant amendment
may be unilaterally issued under 40 CFR 30.900-2, using EPA Form 5700-
208(11-79), to obligate funds which would be subject to reallotment sooner
than funds reflected in the grant instrument. Any funds freed up by this
G-30
-------
transfer will be returned to the State allotment of the fiscal year funds
having a later reallotment deadline.
In no case may funds be used for grant assistance awarded before the
initial date of authorization for those funds.
IV. SAVINGS PROVISION
From time to time, the Office of the Comptroller may find it necessary
to withold, withdraw, or place additional constraints or controls on fund
allowances issued under the foregoing policies and procedures in order to
comply with provisions of authorizing or appropriation legislation, direc-
tives of the Office of Management and Budget or other external requirements.
C. Morgan Kinghorn
Comptroller
Date:
G-31
-------
ADDRESSEES:
Executive Officer, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Associate Administrator for International Activities (A-106)
Associate Administrator for Regional Operations (A-101)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-110)
Director, Office of Civil Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Audit (A-109)
Director, Office of Investigations (A-109)
Director, Office of Management and Technical Assessment (A-109)
Assistant Administrator for External Affairs (A-100)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Congressional Liaison (A-103)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)
Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources Management (PM-208)
Comptroller (PM-225)
Director, Budget Division (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Planning and Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Air, Radiation, Enforcement and Management Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Research and Development Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Water, Pesticides and Toxics Substances Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund/RCRA Branch (PM-225)
Director, Financial Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Reports and Analysis Branch (PM-226)
Director, Office of Administration (PM-217)
Director, Personnel Management Division (PM-208)
Director, Management and Organization Division (PM-213)
Director, Facilities and Support Services Division (PM-215)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Review and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Office of Information Resources Management (PM-211)
Director, Office of Budget and Control (PM-208)
Director, Office of Human Resources Management (PM-224)
Assistant Administrator for Policy, Planning and Evaluation (PM-219)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Director, Program Evaluation Division (PM-222)
G-32
-------
-2-
Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office of General Counsel (LE-130)
Assistant Administrator for Water (WH-556)
Director, Office of Water Enforcement and Permits (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Programs Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (WH-546)
Director, Office of Groundwater Protection (WH-550)
Director, Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (WH-550)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339)
Director, Office of Mobile Sources (ANR-445)
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C)
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (ANR-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-788)
Director, Office of Toxics Intergration (TS-777)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Office of Research Program Management (RD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689)
Director, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Director, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-681)
Director, Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-682)
Director, Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
N.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigation, Denver, Colorado 80225
Director, Technical Support Division, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Motor Vehicle Emission Test Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Road,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, (PM-226)
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26 West
St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Box 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 98114
G-33
-------
-3-
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, (MD-75) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Monitoring and Systems Lab/ORD, Cincinnati©, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office/ORD, (MD-52)
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Executive Officer, Support Services Office, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory/ORD, (MD-59)
Research Triangle, N.C. 27711
Director, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab, Ada, Oklahoma 74820
Director, Andrew W. Breldenbach, Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Georgia 30613'
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Corvallis, Oregon 97333
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Duluth, Minnesota 55804
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Narragansett, R.I. 02882
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
Regional Administrator, Region 1, Boston
Regional Administrator, Region 2, New York
Regional Administrator, Region 3, Philadelphia
Regional Administrator, Region 4, Atlanta
Regional Administrator, Region 5, Chicago
Regional Administrator, Region 6, Dallas
Regional Administrator, Region 7, Kansas City
Regional Administrator, Region 8, Denver
Regional Administrator, Region 9, San Francisco
Regional Administrator, Region 10, Seattle
Director, Administrator Services Division, Region 1
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management - Regions 2,3,4,6,7,& 8
Director, Office of Planning and Management Division, Region 5
Associate Regional Administrator for Policy Technical & Res. Management - Region 9
Director, Management Division - Region 10
Financial Management Officer, Regions 1,2,4,5,8 & 10
Comptroller, Regions 3,6,7 & 9
G-34
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
"10V I 5 !C
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATION
AND RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
PolicjL-and Procedure Memorandum //9-F
"Recovery and Usfcx6f CAi/struction Grant Funds"
orn
(PM-2255
Comptrolle1
See Attached Listing
I have attached for your information and guidance Policy and Procedure
Memorandum //9-E "Recovery and Use of Construction Grant Funds." This
memorandum supersedes Policy and Procedure Memorandum #9-E dated November 29,
1983.
This Policy and Procedure Memorandum has been revised to indicate that
requests for reissuance of Construction Grant recoveries should be directed
to the Budget Division. We would also like to reiterate our requirement that
all requests be submitted in the format indicated in Attachment A of this
memo.
If you have any questions on the content of this memorandum, please contact
Donna Carmlcal (382-4209) of my staff.
Attachments
G-35
-------
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDUM //9-F
Recovery and Use of Construction Grant Funds
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to set forth (1) procedures for
handling funds recovered from previously awarded projects, (2) policies for
utilizing FY 1972 and prior funds for cost overruns on Title II projects,
and (3) policies for funding grant increases for cost overruns on Section 8
projects. This memorandum supersedes Policy and Procedure Memorandum #9-E
Issued on November 29, 1983.
II. DEFINITIONS
Section 8 projects are projects awarded on and prior to December 31,
1972, under P.L. 84-660, as amended and those limited number of projects funded
under P.L. 84-660, as amended, after December 31, 1972, with discretionary funds.
By definition, these projects exclude Section 206 projects as defined below.
Title II projects are projects awarded after December 31, 1972, under
P.L. 92-500.
Section 206 projects are projects which are eligible for reimbursement
under Section 206 of P.L. 92-500.
Available 1972 and prior-year funds are the prevailing amounts of
unobligated funds from 1972 and prior-year appropriations which are issued
at the Regional level and the Regional Administrator determines the State-
by-State allocation. These are available for obligation when issued in an Advice
of Allowance.
Title II authority is the prevailing amount of unobligated authority
under P.L. 92-500 which is issued to a Region in an Advice of Allowance and
which, therefore, is available for obligation.
III. PROCEDURE FOR RECOVERIES
A. Reapportionment
Title II, 1972, and prior-year funds recovered from the deobligation of
awards made in any fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the deobligation
is made, must first be reapportioned by the Office of Management and Budget
before they can be made available for reobligation.
B. Deobligation
•
At such times as a grant decrease or withdrawal is made against grants
awarded in a fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the grant decreases
or withdrawal occurs, the Regional Financial Management Officer should take
appropriate action to .deobligate the respective funds and record these deobli-
gations in the Financial Management System. This procedure applies to grants
awarded with both Title II authority and 1972 and prior-year funds.
G-36
-------
-2-
C. Request for Reissuance
As funds are deobligated, the Regional Financial Management Officer
should request their recovery and reissuance by the Budget Division, Office
of the Comptroller. This request should verify that the deobligation has
been accomplished and properly recorded. The request should be received
in the Budget Division by close-of-business on the second Wednesday £f
each month. Prompt receipt of requests will assure that recoveries will be
included in the Construction Grants Advices of Allowance which are issued
prior to the end of the month. Requests should be directed to the attention
of the Budget Formulation and Control Branch, Budget Division, and should
be in the format of Attachment A, indicating the amount of funds deobligated,
by State and by appropriation. You should also include the reason for the
deobligation. This information will enable us to better answer queries
from the Office of Management and Budget regarding recoveries.
The Regional Administrator has the prerogative of redistributing re-
coveries of 1972 and prior-year funds (except 1964, 1965, and 1966 funds
which revert to the treasury) and also Section 206 funds after reissuance;
therefore, the request need not specify how the recovered funds are to be
reissued to Individual State accounts.
D. Reissuance
Upon receipt of requests, the Budget Division will review and reissue
the funds in accordance with the specifications of the request.
All recovered Title II authority, other than Section 206 recoveries,
will be credited to the allowances of the same States from which the funds
are recovered. All recovered 1972 and prior-year funds (except 1964, 1965,
and 1966 funds) and all Section 206 funds will be credited to the allowance
of the same Region from which the funds are recovered. The Regional
Administrator will have the discretion to determine how these recoveries
are credited to the States within his Region.
All recovered 1964, 1965 and 1966 funds will revert to the Treasury and
will not be reissued to the Regions. At such times in the future, when avail-
able 1972 and prior-year funds within a State's allocation exceed its potential
needs for cost overruns, these funds will be reallocated to States having cost
overrun needs which cannot be satisfied with their available 1972 and prior-
year funds.
IV. GRANT INCREASES
A. Title II Projects
Available 1972 and prior-year funds may be used to fund grant increases
for any and all active Title II projects, provided that:
the State has no foreseeable need to use these recovered funds
for cost overruns on active P.L. 84-660 projects. (The State
must certify, and the Regional Administrator must concur,
that recovered 1972 and prior-year funds are not required
to cover possible future P.L. 84-660 project cost overruns).
G-37
-------
-3-
such recovered funds are utilized only for existing active
Title II projects and not for new projects or continuation
projects involving a change in scope.
- all conditions, eligibilities, and requirements in the
original Title II grant apply to grant Increases to the
grant as well and are riot changed as a result of using FY
1972 and prior-year funds.
- such recovered funds can only be applied to Title II grant
increases for projects jfrom the same State from which the
funds were recovered.
- grant Increases to Title II projects, using FY 1972 and
prior-year funds, shall,adhere to policy guidance and
regulations .required under Title II of P.L. 92-500.
B. Section 8 Projects
Available 1972 and prior-year funds and Title II authority may be used
to fund grant increases for cost overruns on any and all active Section 8
projects except those eligible for funding under Section 206 of P.L. 92-500,
provided that:
- all available 1972 and prior-year funds within a State's
current allocation are completely used before using
Title II current authority;
- such grant increases are'not used to change the scope
of the project (changes in scope of Section 8 must be
treated as separate projects-applied for, processed
and funded under Title II); and
- such grant increases are at the same percentage as
the original grant. '
I
C. Exceptions i
Available 1972 and prior-year funds and Title II authority may not
be used to fund grant increases of any kind to Section 8 projects eligible
for funding under Section 206 of P.L. 92-500. Only monies authorized under
and appropriated for Section 206 may be used to fund grant increases to
Section 206 projects, including grant increases for cost overruns to such
projects which occur after January 31, 1974.
Title II authority may not be used to increase grants awarded from
funds authorized for fiscal year 1972 up to 75 percent (See Section 202(a)(l)
of P.L. 92-500). However, available 1972 and prior-year funds may be used
for this purpose. Title II authority and 1972 and prior-year funds can be
used for grant increases for cost overruns on Section 202 projects, but
the percentage of the grant increase may not exceed the percentage reached
through application of Section 202.
G-38
-------
SAMPLE
Attachment A
RPIO: 01
o
u>
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Construction Grants Recoveries
Report for the month of December 1984
Appropriation
Identificalton
68X0103.A
Subtotal
68X0103.B
Subtotal
TOTAL
State
Amount
18,205
$207,748
Reason for
Deobllgation
Connecticut
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
$178,642
10,901
189,543
12,802
5,403
Audit
Final Costs
Bid Received
SAMPLE
-------
ADDRESSEES:
Executive Officer, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Associate Administrator for International Activities (A-106)
Associate Administrator for Regional Operations (A-101)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-110)
Director, Office of Civil Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Audit (A-109)
Director, Office of Investigations (A-109)
Director, Office of Management and Technical Assessment (A-109)
Assistant Administrator for External Affairs (A-100)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Congressional Liaison (A-103)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)
Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources Management (PM-208)
Comptroller (PM-225)
Director, Budget Division (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Planning and Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Air, Radiation, Enforcement and Management Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Research and Development Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Water, Pesticides and Toxics Substances Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund/RCRA Branch (PM-225)
Director, Financial Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal. Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Reports and Analysis Branch (PM-226)
Director, Office of Administration (PM-217)
Director, Personnel Management Division (PM-208)
Director, Management and Organization Division (PM-213)
Director, Facilities and Support Services Division (PM-215)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Review and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Office of Information Resources Management (PM-211)
Director, Office of Budget and Control (PM-208)
Director, Office of Human Resources Management (PM-224)
Assistant Administrator for Policy, Planning and Evaluation (PM-219)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Director, Program Evaluation Division (PM-222)
G-40
-------
-2-
Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office of General Counsel (LE-130)
Assistant Administrator for Water (WH-556)
Director, Office of Water Enforcement and Permits (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Programs Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (WH-546)
Director, Office of Groundwater Protection (WH-550)
Director, Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (WH-550)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339.)
Director, Office of Mobile Sources (ANR-445)
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C)
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (ANR-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-788)
Director, Office of Toxics Intergration (TS-777)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Office of Research Program Management (RD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689)
Director, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Director, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-681)
Director, Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-682)
Director, Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
N.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigation, Denver, Colorado 80225
Director, Technical Support Division, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Motor Vehicle Emission Test Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Road,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, (PM-226)
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26 West
St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Financial Management Officer, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Box 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 98114
G-4.1
-------
-3-
Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, (MD-75) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Bovlrooaental Monitoring and Systems Lab/ORD, Ciricinnatio, Ohio 45268
Director, Jparlrot»«nt«l Monitoring Systems Lab/ORD, Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Director, Bavlromietital Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office/ORD, (MD-52)
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Executive Officer, Support Services Office, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Health Effects Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Director, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory/ORD, (MD-59)
Research Triangle, N.C. 27711
Director, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab, Ada, Oklahoma 74820
Director, Andrew W. .Breidenbach, Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Georgia 30613
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Corvallis, Oregon 97333
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Duluth, Minnesota 55804
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Narragansett, R.I. 02882
Director, Environmental Research Lab, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
Regional Administrator, Region 4,
Regional Administrator,
Regional Administrator,
Regional Administrator,
Regional Administrator,
Region 5,
Region 6,
Region 7,
Regional Administrator, Region 1, Boston
Regional Administrator, Region 2, New York
Regional Administrator, Region 3, Philadelphia
Atlanta
Chicago
Dallas
Kansas City
Region 8, Denver
Regional Administrator, Region 9, San Francisco
Regional Administrator, Region 10, Seattle
Director, Administrator Services Division, Region 1
Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management - Regions 2,3,4,6,7,& 8
Director, Office of Planning and Management Division, Region 5
Associate Regional Administrator for Policy Technical & Res. Management - Region 9
Director, Management Division - Region 10
Financial Management Officen, Regions 1,2,4,5,8 & 10
Comptroller, Regions 3,6,7 & 9
G-42
-------
-4-
Grant awards to all Section 8 projects which have been or will be
in a preconstruction stage for more than twenty-four (24) months are to
be terminated by the Regional Administrator unless a waiver is requested
and approved by the Assistant Administrator for Water.
V. SAVINGS PROVISIONS
From time to time, the Office of the Comptroller may find it necessary
to withhold, withdraw, or place additional constraints or controls on
Advices of Allowance issued under the foregoing policies and procedures in
order to comply with provisions of authorizing or appropriating legislation,
directives of the Office of Management and Budget, or other external
requirements.
Date:
G-43
-------
*, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
'JUL 9 1982
OFFICE OF
POLICY AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO;
and Pro
Comptroller (PM-?£5)
See Attached Listing
Memorandum #17-A
Attached for your information and guidance is Policy and
Procedure Memorandum #17-A "Contract Planning, Submission and
Approval Requirements." This memorandum supersedes Policy and
Procedure Memorandum #17 dated October 1, 1979, and pertains
only to contract actions under EPA awarded contracts.
It has been revised to reflect updated EPA policies and procedures
for budgeting, planning and submitting contract procurements.
The revisions incorporate the President's initiatives for national
economic recovery, which includes new policies designed to encourage
greater control over government procurement and to eliminate
unnecessary buying and waste.
You should take whatever steps are necessary to comply with the
requirements of this memorandum. Our ability to properly manage
procurement for your programs and improve the Agency's management
of available contract resources depends on your cooperation.
Attachment
G-45
-------
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDUM #17-A
Contract Planning, Submission, and Approval Requirements
I. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
The purpose of this memorandum is to set forth EPA policies and procedures
for budgeting, planning, and submitting contract procurements. It supersedes
Policy and Procedure Memorandum #17, issued on October 1, 1979, and pertains only
to contract actions under EPA awarded contracts. The requirement for detailed
planning of cooperative agreements, grants, interagency agreements, small
purchases or orders under GSA or other agencies' contracts has been deleted.
The original, issuance of Policy and Procedure Memorandum #17 resulted
from an agreement among all affected parties that there was a need to: 1) plan
annual workloads for appropriate servicing of Agency-wide procurement needs;
2) develop acceptable targets and schedules to meet various procurement "set
aside" requirements? 3) provide access to contractual data to program offices
as needed; 4) improve the process of developing, submitting, and processing
contracts; and, 5) improve methods for determining project eligibility for
carryover funds. These needs continue and have been supplemented by the
President's new program for national economic recovery. '
This revised memorandum reflects that program, which includes new policies
designed to encourage greater control over government procurement and eliminate
unnecessary buying and waste. Recent initiatives in contract procurement
policies and procedures are the result of requirements contained in implementing
directives such as: 1) OMB Memorandum dated August 12, 1981, on Reducing and
Controlling Unnecessary Year-end Spending; 2) Office of Federal Procurement
Policy (OFPP) Letter 81-1, dated August 13, 1981 on Procurement Procedures,
Advance Procuraiient Planning and Review of End-of-Year Purchases; and 3) OFPP
Memorandum for Agency Contact Points dated August 24, 1981 on the Prevention of
Waste and Mismanagement in Procurement by Reducing and Controlling Unnecessary
Year-end Spending. EPA's response to these new requirements was the October 16,
1981, memorandum entitled "Contract Planning and Approval Requirements for FY
1982", most of which has been included in this revised memorandum.
The best way to achieve tine goals of this memorandum is for all program
officials to: 1) prepare and submit initial contract plans within the timeframe
allowed; 2) increase control and review by Agency top managers of contract plans
and procurement requests; 3) submit accurate planning updates promptly when
major contract changes occur; and, 4) meet or exceed the required 85% submittal
level prior to April 30 of each fiscal year.
G-46
-------
-2-
II. DEFINITIONS
Allowance Holders are EPA managers who are responsible for implementing a
part of the Agency's Annual Operating Plan and for reporting on the progress of
the program and the budget. They manage allowances which are a portion of the
Agency's resources used to finance specific parts of the Annual Operating Plan.
Allowance Holders are responsible to their Responsible Planning and Implementation
Officer for program resources and the preparation, implementation, and submission
of the Annual Operating Plan. The Chief of Staff, Regional Administrators,
Associate Administrators, and Assistant Administrators are both Allowance Holders
and RPIOs. All other Allowance Holders serve under a RPIO.
Carryover Funds are funds that are not obligated by the end of a fiscal
year and which nay be obligated in the next fiscal year. They include'
unobligated balances in no-year and two-year appropriations. Carryover funds may
be used in the current fiscal year on either contract actions brought forward
from the previous year, or on new procurement actions.
Commitments are the reservations of funds for specific projects or
services to be procured. The term refers to funds which have been submitted for
obligation processing and entered in the Financial Management System (FMS) prior
to formal obligation.
Contracts are legal documents between two or more parties which are used
to acquire and/or deliver real property or services. For the purpose of this
memorandum, R&D contracts, program contracts, ADP service contracts, and other
contracts and contract modifications processed and administered by the
Procurement and Contracts Management Division (P&CMD) in Headquarters, and the
Contracts Management Divisions in Research Triangle Park (RTP) and Cincinnati
are included under this definition. Purchase orders, construction contracts
under $2,000, delivery orders under Federal Supply Schedule and other agencies'
contracts, cooperative agreements, grants, interagency agreements, training and
tuition contracts, printing contracts and other contracts not administered by
the three contracting offices are excluded from this definition.
FMS and RMIS Object Class Codes are codes assigned to categories of goods
or services for which the Agency spends funds. Specific definitions for
Resources Management Information System (RMIS) and Financial Management System
(FMS) Object Class Codes are given in Appendix B.3 of the EPA Planning and
Budgeting Manual. These codes are used for tracking ccmmitments, obligations and
disbursements on these two information systems.
Obligations are the result of executed contracts or other legal promises
to lease, purchase and/or deliver real property of services. Obligations occur
when contracts or other legal documents are signed by the parties involved, and
submitted to financial management for recording and official designation of funds
in accordance with the terms of the contract. A contract or other document is
referred to as an obligating document.
G-47
-------
-3-
The Annual Operating Plan is a detailed quarterly distribution of the
allocation of program resources to achieve Agency goals. The Annual Operating
Plan is prepared under the direction of RPIOs by Allowance Holders and submitted
to the Office of the Comptroller annually and updated as needed. It provides the
estimated quarterly obligations for the fiscal year by Allowance Holder, program
element, section of law, and object class.
Responsible Planning and Implementation Officers (RPIOs) are Agency top
managers who are responsible for the review, control and management over programs
and resources assigned to them and for compliance with requirements related to
the overall planning and budgeting process. They develop, submit and implement
their own Annual Operating Plan. The Chief of Staff, Associate Administrators,
and Assistant Administrators serve as RPIOs over the Allowance. Holders within
their respective offices. All of the above are both RPIOs and Allowance Holders.
Small Purchases include the following: 1) purchases where the sum involved
in any one transaction does not exceed $10,000, or $2,000 when procuring con-
struction; 2) delivery orders written against the GSA Federal Supply Schedules
which can exceed $10,000 and are limited only by the maximum order limitation in
each schedule; and, 3) imprest fund transactions which may be used for procure-
ments of $200 or less; unless a lower limit is established by local procedures.
The funds for these procurements will be planned against the appropriate RMIS
object class codes and committed and obligated against the appropriate FMS object
class codes. Small purchases and contract procurements may be charged to the
same RMIS and/or FMS code.
III. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
A. Annual Contract Plan Submission
All Allowance Haiders must prepare and submit a plan showing anticipated
contract actions from all appropriations to be submitted to the contracting
offices during each fiscal year. Beginning with the initial Contract Planning
System Submission for FY 1983, Contract Plans will be prepared and submitted in
the August/Septerber time frame proceeding the fiscal year and concurrent with
Phase III of the Operating Plan.
Allowance Holders should use the Contract Planning form, EPA Form 2410-9,
Rev. 9-81 (Attachment A) or the latest revision, for recording, preparing, and
submitting Contract Plans. Detailed instructions on the use of this form are on
its reverse side. Additional copies of the form may be obtained from the EPA
Self-Service Store or reproduced locally. Alternative planning forms may be
used if approved by the Contract Planning Information and Analysis Section of
the Procurement and Contracts Management Division (P&CMD).
G-48
-------
-4-
Each contract procurement transaction, new contract or nodification, to be
obligated for $100,000 or more will be identified individually on the plan by a
four digit planning identification nunfoer. Similarly, each contract action that
meets the definition for consulting and related services or the definition of
vulnerable high waste procurement area, must also be individually identified and
assigned a planning identification number (Note OMB definitions in Attachment B).
Contract actions below $100,000, which do not meet the definition of
consulting and related services or vulnerable high waste procurement, should be
sunmarized on the plan to show the total number of actions and the total dollars
by fiscal quarter. If reported as separate line items, a planning identification
nuntoer must be assigned to each one. Until mission contracts for emergency
removal actions are executed, procurement actions for immediate removal activity
(emergencies) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, of 1980 commonly referred to as "Superfund", are not required to
be planned. Planned removal and remedial Superfund activities are, however,
subject to this planning requirement.
As previously stated, these planning requirements apply only to contracts
..and contract modifications processed by the contracting offices mentioned above.
Planning data is not required for delivery orders under GSA schedule contracts or
purchase orders, which are also processed by the contracting offices. Also, no
plans are required for cooperative agreements, grants or interagency agreements.
The Contract Planning Submission, which is included in the Annual Operating
Plan Submission, must contain a cover letter signed by the appropriate Assistant
Administrator, Associate Administrator, Regional Administrator, or higher level
official indicating approval of the plan prior to submission to the Office of the
Comptroller. No approving signature below the AA or RA levels will be accepted.
Plans lacking such approvals will be returned to the originating office.
The three contract operations offices will not accept procurement requests
from an Allowance Holder until P&CMD has received Contract Plans that meet the
requirements of this policy and procedure memorandum. The only exceptions will
be emergency requirements approved at the Assistant, Associate, or Regional
Administrator level or higher.
All offices must be prepared to reconcile their Contract Plan with planned
contract resources in the approved Operating Plan. P&CMD, in their review of the
plans and with the assistance of the Office of the Comptroller, wiil be comparing
planned contract resources with approved contract dollars in the Operating Plan.
This analysis will aid P&CMD to estimate the projected contracts workload at
the three contract operations offices to ensure adequate processsing of contracts
for the fiscal year.
G-49
-------
-5-
The timing of planned contract submissions must adhere to the requirement
that procurement requests, totalling at least 85% of the total available contract
dollars, be submitted by April 30. Available contract dollars include New Obli-
gation Authority (NOA) appropriations for the fiscal year of the plan, plus any
carryover funding not previously submitted to P&CMD for contract processing. In
addition, planned submissions must also meet established cut-off dates as pre-
scribed in Section III. D. below. The difference between the 85% requirement and
the actual levels will be withdrawn from those Allowance Iblders whose actual
submissions are less than 85% and placed in Agency reserves, unless a deviation is
approved by the Office of the Comptroller.
B. Plan Update
Any major changes in contract submission planning must be reported in a
Contract Plan update and promptly submitted to the P&CMD (PM-214). All reporting
requirements for updates, including AA or RA level approval, are the sane as for
initial plans. Annual Operating Plan changes that impact Contract Plans should
be reflected in revised contract plans. The Midyear Review will include the
submission of updated Contract Plans, due on March 31, to enable offices to
adjust planned levels in the context of the April 30 cut-off date.
Allowance folders may not change their planned levels of submissions for
obligation if these changes result in less than 85% of their available contract
funds, being planned for submission by April 30, without the approval of the
Office of the Comptroller.
C. Procurement Submittal Procedures
When offices submit Procurement Requests/Requisitions (EPA form 1900-8)
for contract processing, please include the same planning identification number
on the form (item 12) as shown on the Contract Plan for those actions specifi-
cally identified on the Contract Plan. This block of the form may be left blank
for all other actions.
Please be reminded that all Procurement Requests/Requisitions shall be
approved in accordance with the Contracts Management Manual, Chapter 1,
entitled "Procurement Request/Requisition and Rationale Cocuments."
D. Review of Commitments and/or Obligations
Using information supplied from the Financial Management System (FMS)
and the Contract Information System, the Office of the Comptroller will review the
current commitments/obligations for contracts as of April 30 of each fiscal year.
The uncommitted/unobligated balances which are available will be determined for
the RPIO. The Office of the Comptroller will complete its review during May or as
soon as possible thereafter.
G-50
-------
. -6-
Any uncnmtitted/unobligated balances against the 85% requirement for any
Allowance Fblder, who has not secured a deviation from the requirement, will be
withdrawn and placed in the Agency reserve. If Allowance Holders submit
sufficient justification, the withdrawn funds maybe reissued to their allowances.
RPIOs should determine that commitments reflected in the Financial
Management System are accurate and that the contracting offices have the
necessary documents to process. Monthly Contract Information System reports will
be provided to show the status of all transactions.
E. Cut-Off Dates
The cut-off date for receipt of contract submissions by the contracting
offices for obligation before the end of the fiscal year are as follows:
Type of Procurement Cut-off Dates
1) All contracts except extensions as noted
below April 30
2) Extension of Existing Service Contracts
which expire on September 30 June 30
Note; Cut-off dates for small purchases transactions (procurements
under $10,000 or delivery orders under GSA Federal Supply Schedule)
is Sept. 1, except for renewal of leases or maintenance agreements
on equipment for which the cut-off date is June 30.
Contracting offices will make every effort to complete obligation of all
procurements, received by the cut-off date, before the end of the fiscal year.
However, P&CMD cannot guarantee that actions received prior to the cut-off dates
will be obligated by year-end. Processing times depend on the contractor,
program office, audit office, as well as on contracting office action.
Unobligated procurements that were received by the cut-off date will be
given first priority for obligation in the ensuing fiscal year under the following
conditions:
1) Transactions have been properly,recorded as commitments in the
Financial Management System year-end report;
2) Documents are properly executed procurement requests received by a
contracting office; and,
3) The Office of the Comptroller has recertified funds availability
and issued allowances.
G-51
-------
-7-
F. End of Fiscal Year Conrnitment/Cbligation Reconciliation
As a final step in the contract planning process, the Financial Management
Division will provide Allowance Holders with special reports listing all committed
items received by September 30 in finance offices for entry into the FMS. P&CMD
will provide Allowance Holders with a status report on unobligated procurements
received for processing during the fiscal year.
The Allowance Holder will compare these reports to his own records identi-
fying all contracts which were "ccmmitted" as of Septenber 30. Any missing items
or corrections must be transmitted to the appropriate Accounting Operations Office
within five (5) work days of receipt of the special report. In addition, the
RPIO will send an updated conmitment listing to the Financial Management Division,
Financial Reports and Analysis Branch.
The Financial Management Division will compare the RPIO listings with its
own commitment listing, and in conjunction with the RPIO, prepare a consolidated
listing of all outstanding commitments which it will certify for carryover to the
Office of Comptroller. The Office of the Comptroller will review the commitment
listing with the RPIO, prepare a consolidated listing of the status of all out-
standing actions of each RPIO, negotiate reductions in commitments if insufficient
funds are available to the RPIOs and issue carryover Advices of Allowance as pro-r
vided in the latest revision of Policy and Procedure Memorandum #4.
IV. SAVINGS PROVISION
From time to time, the Office of the Comptroller may find it necessary to
withhold, withdraw, or place additional constraints or controls on allowances
issued under the foregoing policies and procedures in order to comply with provi-
sions of authorizing or appropriation legislation, directives of the Office of
Management and Budget, or other external requirements.
JUL 9 1982
Date
G-52
-------
AT
ENT A
OPERATINC PLAN OP-T
CONTRACT PLANNING SUBMISSION (FY ) {ORIGINAL
(Rfmd Instructions on back be/ore completing) |
PREPAMED BY
APPROVED «V
ID
NO.
PHONE NO.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BENEFITS
*
•
-•....- *r • ' •'''•,. -*•
ALLOWANCE HOLDER NO.
REVISION NO.
DATE
RESPONSIBILITY CENTER CODE
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT OFFIC-
ER NAME AND
PHONE NO.
-
AC
81
nfi
"o
H.g
<
TOTALS THIS PACE -^»
CERTIFIED VALUE OF PROCUREMENT REQUFSTS (In Thoummndt)
•UBMITTED
IN
PRIOR YEAR
1ST. QTR.
2ND. QTB.
SHO. OTR.
4TH. OTR.
NEXT YEAR
OOLLARSfTo
b* mubmllM-
IM» jrfmt)
O
I
to
EPA form 2410-9 (ftor. 9-81) Prmtout edition may b« uwd.
PAGE
OF
-------
Attachment B
v- •
OMB DEFINITIONS
The following OMB definitions will be used for Contract Planning System
requirements to identify specific types of controlled procurements:
1) Consulting and Related Services;
A) Consulting services are "services of a purely advisory nature relating
to the governmental functions of agency administration and management and
agency program management" (OMB Circular No. A-120). These services are
provided by individuals or organizations considered to have knowledge or
special abilities not available within the agency or another government agency.
Examples of "agency administration and management" and "agency program manage-
ment" are shown below:
o Advice on or evaluation of agency administration and management,
such as:
- Organizational structures;
- Reorganization plans;
- Management methods; .
- Zero-base budgeting procedures;
- Mail handling procedures;
- Records and file organization;
- Personnel procedures;
- Discriminatory labor practices;
- Agency publications;
- Internal policies, directives, orders, manuals, and procedures;
and
- Management information systems.
o Advice on or evaluation of agency program management, such as:
- Program plans;
- Acquisition strategies;
- Assistance strategies;
- Regulations;
- Assistance or procurement, solicited or unsolicited technical
and cost proposals;
- Legal aspects;
- Economic impacts;
- Program impact; and
- Mission and program analysis.
Any procured service which fits the above definition is considered a
"consulting service," regardless of the FPDS product and service code used.
G-54
-------
Attachment B
Page 2
B) Related services are defined in the OMB Draft Bulletin titled,
"Management Controls for the Procurement of Certain Management and Pro-
fessional Services, Special Studies and Analyses, and Management and
Support Services for Research and Development Activities" (dated
September 11, 1981) as procurement actions that are not identified as
consulting services and are coded with the following FPDS product and
service codes:
Management and Professional Services
FPDS Code Description
R 406 Policy Review/Development Services
R 407 Program Evaluation Services
R 408 Program Management/Support Services
R 409 Program Review/Development Services
R 498 Other Professional Services
R 499 Other Management Services
Special Studies and Analyses
R 505 Cost Benefit Analyses
R 506 Data Analyses (Other than scientific) '
R 507 Economic Studies and Analyses
R 513 Feasibility Studies (non-construction)
R 523 Legislative Studies
R 528 Regulatory Studies
R 531 Socio-economic Studies
R 599 Other Special Studies and Analyses
2) Vulnerable High Waste Procurement Areas are identified in OMB
Bulletin Nos. 81-9 (dated January 30, 1981) and 81-16 (dated April 21, 1981),
OMB Bulletin No. 81-9 covers procurement of certain equipment which is
identified by the following Federal Supply Classification codes:
67 Photographic equipment
69 Training aids and devices (excluding 6920, armament training devices)
70 General purpose ADP equipment, software, supplies and support (excluding
7045, ADP supplies and support equipment)
71 Furniture
72 Household and commercial furnishings and appliances
74 Office machines and visible record equipment
77 Musical instruments, phonographs and hometype radios
78 Recreational and athletic equipment
OMB Bulletin 81-16 covers the areas of journals, magazines, periodicals,
pamphlets, similar publications and audiovisual products. Each of these
areas has a rather detailed definition, which are not listed here.
Please refer to the subject OMB Bulletin if you have questions concerning
publications or services in these areas.
G-55
-------
Distribution List for Policy and Procedure Memorandum
Executive Office, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Director, Office of Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-110)
Director, Office of Civil Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Dlsadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Congressional Liaison (A-103)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of International Activities (A-106)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)
Director, Office of Legislation (A-102)
Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Office of Comptroller (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Planning and Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Air, Radiation and Legal Services Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Toxic, Pesticides Management Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Water Quality Construction Grants Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Hazardous Waste & Superfund Branch (PM-225)
Director, Financial Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Review and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Program Evaluation Division (PM-222)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Associate Administrator for Legal Counsel and Enforcement (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office of General Counsel (A-130)
Director, Office of Enforcement Policy (A-134)
Assistant Administrator for Administration (PM-208)
Director, Office of Personnel and Organization (PM-208)
Director, Office of Fiscal and Contracts Management (PM-224)
Director, Office of Management Information Support Services (PM-211)
Director, Office of Budget and Control (PM-208)
G-56
-------
-£.-
Assistant Administrator for Water (UH-556)
Director, Office of Water Enforcement (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Program Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (WH-546)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
Assistant Administrator for Air, Noise and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air, Noise and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339)
Director, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control (ANR^-455)
Director, Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ANR-471C)
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C)
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (ANR-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-788)
Director, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances Enforcement (EN-342)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Ofice of Research Program Management (RD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff . (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689)
Director, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Director, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-681)
Director, Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-682)
Director, Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Director, Support Services Office, 26 West St. Clair
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Support Services Office, Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigation, Denver
Lowell A. Ven Berg, Director, Technical Support Division, Cin.
Robert H. Browning, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory,
Meterology & Assessment Division (MD 80) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Bob Johnson, Mobile Sources Motor Vehicle Emission Lab.
2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Dr. Marijon Bufallni, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory,
Office of Technical Planning & Review (MD 59) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Gloria J. Koch, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, Office
of the Director (MD 59) Research Triangle, N.C. 27711
G-57
-------
-3-
Cin., Ohio 45268
Las Vegas, Nevada
Research Triangle
Richard Mitchell, Chief, Program Planning Branch, Region 3,
Room 217, Philadelphia, Pa. 19106
Richard Ruhe, FMO, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26. West
St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Donald Mathis, FMO, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Alan Lewis, FMO, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Box 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 98114
Director, Environmental Monitoring & Systems Lab, Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Monitoring & Systems Lab,
Director, Environmental Monitoring & Systems Lab,
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Lab,
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Industrial Environmental Research Center, Cin., Ohio 45268
Director, Environmental Sciences Research Lab, Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Research
Triangle Park. N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessement Office,
Cincinnati, OH. 45268
Director, Health Effects Research Laboratory Research Triangle
C. 27711
Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research, Ada, Oklahoma
Environmental Research Lab, Athens, Georgia 30601
Research Lab,
Research Lab,
Research Lab,
Research Lab,
Park, N
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Director
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Administrator,
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region 8,
Region 9,
Region 10,
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7.
Corvallis, Oregon 97330
Duluth, Minnesota 55804
Narragansett, R.I. 02882
Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Atlanta
Chicago
Dallas
Kansas City
Denver
San Francisco
Seattle
Management Division, Regions 1-8 & 10
Director, Office of Planning and Resources Management, Region 9
Financial Management Officer, Regions 1-8 A 10
Comptroller, Region 9
Office of Regional Counsel, Region 4
Chief, Planning & Evaluation, Region 4
G-58
-------
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FROM:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'381
Draft Policy and Procedure Memorandum on Prevalidation of
Grant%f Contracts anfl Interagency Purchase Agreements
(PM-225)
,cgiie f
Budget Formulation and Control Branch
T0: See Addressees
Lately, several allowance holders have had a moritorium placed
on further obligations until they resolved overobligation
problems in certain of their appropriation accounts.
Because of reduced flexibility in our various appropriations,
as well as changes in the appropriation structure and our
authority to reprogram between accounts, I believe additional
fund controls are necessary.
The attached draft policy and procedure memorandum contains
a proposal for those additional controls. I would appreciate
your comments on the draft by COB August 26, 1981. I would
like to have some controls in place by the first of the new
fiscal year and your help will be appreciated.
Attachment
Addressees:
C. Morgan Kinghorn
John C. Chamberlin
Paul Martin, CMD
Harvey Pippen, GAD
Marc Page, FMD
Form 1320-4 (R.v. 3-7«)
G-59
-------
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDUM f
Fund Control; Prevalidation of Grants, Contracts, and
Interagency Purchase Agreements
I. Purpose
This memorandum specifies additional procedures to prevent
over obligation of Agency appropriations.
II. Background
Agency allowance holders are individually responsible for
assuring that obligations do not exceed their available funds.
Polices and procedures covering this responsibility are
spelled out in ORM Policy and Procedure Memorandum fl-G and
the Financial Management Manual. The fund control philosophy
expressed in these procedures is based on allowance holders
establishing responsibility centers to control funds at the
commitment stage. As there is normally a substantial time
period between the initiation (commitment) of a spending
action and the actual awarding of it (obligation), the office
of the Comptroller has time to deal with potential problems
when reported through the Financial Management System. This
procedure has worked will under the conditions of funding
present in the past ten years. However, much of the
appropriation flexibility that the Agency enjoyed in its
first ten years has been reduced. Changes in appropriation
structure and our authority to reprogram funds has made it
necessary to impose additional contrls. These additional
controls are Spelled out in this memorandum.
G-60
-------
-2-
III. Current Control Procedures
Under existing procedures, the allowance holder certifies
that funds are available for spending actions on the
documentation submitted to the organization responsible for
the awarding process. At the same time, the allowance holder
submits commitment documentation to the Financial Management
System. In those instances where commitments, exceed avail-
able funds, the Office of the Comptroller takes action based
on end of month reporting to resolve the problem with the
allowance holder.
IV. Additional Control Procedures for Grants and Contracts
The time period between the commitment and the award of a
grant or contract is substantial. Often, allowance holders
initiate other funding actions that invalidate the original
certification of fund availability. Tb assure that funds are
available at the time of award, the Financial Management
Division will establish a prevalidation check off with contract
and grant awarding organizations. Grants and contracts will
not be awarded unless the commitment is reflected in the
Financial Management System. Notification of funding approval
will be made by transfer between the Financial Management
System and the Contracts and Grants Information System. Where
a commitment exists in the Financial Management System and the
available funds have not been exceeded, there will be no delay
in the award process.
G-61
-------
-3-
In the event that a commitment does not exist or Financial
Management has given notice of over commitment, the award of
the grant or contract must be delayed until the funding problem
is resolved. The awarding organization will notify the
allowance holder of the problem. The allowance holder is
responsible for resolving, the problem with Financial Management.
When resolved, Financial Management will provide a release to
the awarding organization.
V. Interagency Purchase Agreements
As commitments are not mandatory for interagency purchase
agreements, validation of agreements will be done by Finance
Offices when the obligating copy is submitted. Where funds are
not available, the Finance Office will notify the allowance
holder to terminate the agreement.
VI. Initiation of Spending Actions
Since commitments will be edited against available funds in
the operating plan, allowance holders must not initiate spending
actions against changes in the operating plan until the
reprogramming actions have been formally approved. It is
the Allowance Holder's responsibility to assure a commitment
is entered in the Financial Management System for every grant
or contract.
G-62
-------
-4-
VII. Effective Date
This procedure will be effective with the start of fiscal
year 1982 - October 1, 1981.
VIII. SAVING PROVISION; Prom time to time, the Office of the
Comptroller may find it necessary to withhold, withdraw, or
place additional constraints or controls on allowances issued
under the foregoing policies and procedures in order to comply
with provisions of authorizing or appropriation legislation,
directives of the Office of Management and Budget or other
external requirements.
C. Morgan Kinghorn, Comptroller
Office of the Comptroller
Date:
G-63
-------
J . UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
\ WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
**f
MAY 20 1982
OFFICE OF
POLICY AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Rescinded Policy and Procedure Memorandum #20 A
q^Ob/igatlon
f/ ff **»
FROM: C^WoTgln^ingTSonT
nptroller (PM-225)
TO: See Attached Listing
This is to notify all allowance holders that Policy and Procedure
Memorandum #20 dated April 20, 1981 is hereby rescinded.
This Policy and Procedure Memorandum, in accordance with a General
Provision Included in the HUD-Independent Agencies 1981 Appropriations
Act, limited fourth quarter obligations to no more than 30 percent of
the total funds available. The limitation is not included in our 1982
Appropriations Act and therefore does not apply to this fiscal year.
If you should have any questions, please contact Vincette Goerl at
382-4176.
Attachment
G-65
-------
Distribution List for Policy and Procedure Memorandum
Executive Office, Office of the Administrator (A-100)
Director, Office of Inspector General (A-109)
Director, Office of Administrative Law Judges (A-110)
Director, Office of C1v1l Rights (A-105)
Director, Office of Small and Dlsadvantaged Business Utilization (A-149)
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board (A-101)
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Liaison (A-102)
Director, Office of Congressional Liaison (A-103)
Director, Office of Public Affairs (A-107)
Director, Office of International Activities (A-106)
Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104)
Director, Office of Legislation (A-102)
Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Resource Management (PM-219)
Office of Comptroller (PM-225)
Chief, Budget Formulation and Control Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Planning and Systems Branch (PM-225)
Chief, A1r, Radiation and Legal Services Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Toxic, Pesticides Management Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Superfund Branch (PM-225) *
Chief, Water Quality Construction Grants Branch (PM-225)
Chief, Hazardous Waste & Superfund Branch (PM-225)
Director, Financial Management Division (PM-226)
Chief, Fiscal Policies and Procedures Branch (PM-226)
Chief, Financial Systems Branch (PM-226)
Director, Grants Administration Division (PM-216)
Chief, Grants Operations Branch (PM-216)
Director, Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PM-214)
Chief, Cost Review and Policy Branch (PM-214)
Director, Program Evaluation Division (PM-222)
Director, Office of Standards and Regulations (PM-223)
Director, Office of Policy Analysis (PM-221)
Director, Office of Management Systems and Evaluation (PM-222)
Associate Administrator for Legal Counsel and Enforcement (EN-329)
Director, Office of Program and Management Operations (EN-329)
Director, Office of General Counsel (A-130)
Director, Office of Enforcement Policy (A-134)
Assistant Administrator for Administration (PM-208)
Director, Office of Personnel and Organization (PM-208)
Director, Office of Fiscal and Contracts Management (PM-224)
Director, Office of Management Information Support Services (PM-211)
G-66
-------
-2-
Asslstant Administrator for Water (WH-556)
Director, Office of Water Enforcement (EN-335)
Director, Office of Water Regulations and Standards (WH-551)
Director, Office of Water Program Operations (WH-546)
Director, Office of Drinking Water (WH-550)
Director, Office of Program Management and Evaluation (WH-546)
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (WH-562A)
Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (WH-527)
Director, Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (WH-548)
Assistant Administrator for Air, Noise and Radiation (ANR-443)
Director, Office of Air, Noise and Radiation Enforcement (EN-339)
Director, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control (ANR-455)
Director, Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ANR-471C) .
Director, Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-458C)
Director, Office of Program Management Operations (ANR-458C)
Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances (TS-788)
Director, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances Enforcement (EN-342)
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (TS-766C)
Director, Office of Toxic Substances (TS-792)
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development (RD-672)
Director, Ofice of Research Program Management (RD-674)
Chief, Administrative Management Staff (RD-674)
Chief, Planning Staff (RD-674)
Director, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (RD-689)
Director, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (RD-680)
Director, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology (RD-681)
Director, Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research (RD-682)
Director, Office of Health Research (RD-683)
Director, Support Services Office, 26 West St. Clalr
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Director, Support Services Office, Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, National Enforcement Investigation, Denver
Lowell A. Ven Berg, Director, Technical Support Division, Cin.
Robert H. Browning, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory,
Meterology & Assessment Division (MD 80) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Bob Johnson, Mobile Sources Motor Vehicle Emission Lab.
2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Dr. Marijon Bufallni, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory,
Office of Technical Planning & Review (MD 59) Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Gloria J. Koch, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, Office
of the Director (MD 59) Research Triangle, N.C. 27711
G-67
-------
-3-
Richard Mitchell, Chief, Program Planning Branch, Region 3,
Room 217, Philadelphia, Pa. 19106
Richard Ruhe, FMO, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, 26 West
St. Clalr Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Donald Mathls, FMO, EPA, Accounting Operations Office (MD-32),
Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711
Alan Lewis, FMO, EPA, Accounting Operations Office, P.O. Box 18418,
Las Vegas, Nevada 98114
Director, Environmental Monitoring & Systems Lab, Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Monitoring
Director, Environmental Monitoring
Industrial Environmental
.C. 27711
Industrial Environmental Research Center, C1n., Ohio 45268
Director,
Park, N.
Director,
Director,
Park, N,
Director,
A Systems Lab,
Systems Lab,
Research Lab,
C1n., Ohio 45268
Las Vegas, Nevada
Research Triangle
Environmental Sciences Research Lab, Research Triangle
.C. 27711
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Research
Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Environmental Criteria and Assessement Office,
Cincinnati, OH. 45268
Director, Health Effects Research Laboratory Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711
Director, Municipal Environmental Research Lab, Cincinnati, Ohio
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research, Ada, Oklahoma
Environmental
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Director,
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator
Administrator,
Director, Management Division, Regions 1-10
Financial Management Officer, Regions 1-10
Office of Regional Counsel, Region 4
Chief, Planning & Evaluation, Region 4
i r\c oca i uii U.QUJ 9 n uiidi j 9 vjcv i y i a %i<
1 Research Lab, CorvalHs, Oregon
1 Research Lab, Duluth, Minnesota
1 Research Lab, Narragansett, R.I.
j\j
-------
APPENDIX H
-------
APPENDIX H
Funds Control Manual
(to be included at a later date)
-------
|