-------
GLO65561.FI.FA Polyur Foam 2 1-25-90
RESIDENTIAL AREA
rK7^;™''^""""-^
t..
\--^5^^^ if
X ^^^fe^-^Ci
^^^-Z"^
*K •• * -""V"- .s.
•M14- ^O- ^- •**•- ~*£-.S.~,.£
22-MILE ROAD-
\\
500
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
Predominant
Wind
Direction:
SSW
LEGEND
Landfill Boundary
U.S. EPA Site Fence
Gate
Ditch, stream, or
river
Trail
Railroad grade
• ( (Tracks removed)
PUF Sampling Location
Monitoring Well Location
NOTE: Locations are approximate.
Sample Date: JUNE 1,1989
Sample Time Interval: 10:00 to 14:03
Meteorological Conditions During
Sampling From NWS Data
Average Wind Speed: 14 mph
Average Temperature: 72' F
Predominant Wind Direction: SSW
Sample Location Codes
UW= Upwind
SA= Seep Area
AL = Aeration Lagoon
BH = Borehole
FRAL = Field Replicate
Aeration Lagoon
FIGURE 12
AMBIENT AIR
POLYURETHANE FOAM
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 8
-------
Page 1 of 3
Table 6
G&H LANDFILL SITE
COMPARISON OF NWS AND ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL DATA
COLLECTED DURING AMBIENT AIR MONITORING EVENTS
National Weather Service Data (NWS)
Date Time
May 22, 1989 08:50
09:53
10:50
11:51
12:54
13:51
14:50
15:50
16:51
17:50
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
200
60
170
220
130
120
140
120
120
120
Wind
Speed
(mph)
6
7
8
10
9
12
13
12
12
8
Temperature
(degrees R
66
71
73
75
75
76
74
73
71
70
Onsite Data
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
Variable
150
160
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
90
50
Wind
Speed
(mp
3
3
3
4
4
5
7
5
6
9
m
May 23,1989
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:50
16:51
40
30
360
20
10
10
12
10
12
10
13
12
62
63
64
66
68
69
360
20
40
360
340
30
5
6
7
5
6
8
May 24,1989
07:50
08:50
09:51
10:50
11:51
12:50
200
200
150
160
150
140
10
12
9
12
9
12
60
63
66
71
76
75
160
170
160
150
160
150
3
6
5
6
6
8
May 25, 1989
10:52
11:50
12:51
13:50
14:51
15:53
230
250
230
230
260
240
16
18
17
18
17
10
70
74
76
79
80
81
180
190
220
210
210
220
7
7
8
8
7
7
-------
Table 6
G&H LANDFILL SITE
COMPARISON OF NWS AND ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL DATA
COLLECTED DURING AMBIENT AIR MONITORING EVENTS
Page 2 of 3
National Weather Service Data (NWS)
Date
May 31, 1989
June 1, 1989
August 7, 1989
Augusts, 1989
Time
12:51
13:51
14:51
15:53
16:50
17:32
17:50
18:12
18:50
08:50
09:52
10:50
11:27
11:52
12:50
13:50
14:09
14:52
11:50
12:50
13:52
14:50
15:50
16:50
17:50
18:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:51
16:51
17:51
18:51
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
140
240
240
220
240
230
230
230
230
180
180
210
180
210
250
270
260
280
300
290
310
300
300
310
320
320
320
340
340
290
290
330
240
240
190
Wind
Speed
(mph)
8
17
17
20
17
16
17
17
20
10
13
14
14
17
16
10
12
10
15
17
16
13
14
14
16
17
8
12
12
7
7
8
9
12
9
Temperature
(degrees R
77
80
81
82
82
80
78
70
72
71
71
72
74
76
63
65
66
65
64
62
64
61
64
66
68
70
71
72
71
70
68
Onsite Data
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
140
170
180
180
200
200
190
30
130
160
180
180
210
230
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Wind
Speed
(mph)
5
5
6
7
8
— —
5
—
4
4
4
5
—
5
8
6
—
7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
Table 6
G&H LANDFILL SITE
COMPARISON OF NWS AND ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL DATA
COLLECTED DURING AMBIENT AIR MONITORING EVENTS
Page 3 of 3
Date Time
Augusts, 1989 08:50
09:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:51
16:50
August 10, 1989 09:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:53
16:52
August 11, 1989 08:50
09:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:04
14:50
15:35
15:51
16:50
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
200
180
190
200
240
230
180
200
230
240
270
180
280
270
280
290
130
360
290
190
10
60
30
30
190
210
240
280
Wind
Speed
(mph)
8
7
8
9
14
15
14
13
14
9
9
12
12
9
9
9
8
4
4
4
6
7
12
7
12
7
7
7
74
76
78
79
80
79
81
81
73
76
79
82
79
76
70
75
77
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA = Data Not Available
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 8
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI
POLYURETHANE FOAM SAMPLING
Samples were collected using U.S. EPA Reference Method TO-10, which consists of
drawing air through a polyurethane foam plug with a personal sampling pump. The four
locations sampled each day were upwind of the landfill, downwind of the seep area,
downwind of the aeration lagoon, and downwind of a borehole. Samples were identified
using a sample code consisting of the site code (GH); the sample type (AA for ambient
air); the sample collection medium (P for PUF sample); the location code, which indicates
from which of the four locations the sample was collected; and a number code that
identifies the date the sample was collected. PUF samples with the number code 01 were
collected on May 31, and samples with the number code 02 were collected on June 1.
The location codes used for PUF sampling are:
UW Upwind
SA Seep Area
AL Aeration Lagoon
BH Borehole
A field replicate was represented by an FR preceding the location code. The sampling
locations and the meteorological conditions that existed during sample collection are shown
in Figures 11 and 12.
This phase of the sampling program was delayed because the laboratory mistakenly sent
high volume PUF sample cartridges instead of the low volume cartridges specified in the
SAS request. The laboratory purchased the correct low volume cartridges, certified them
clean, and shipped them to the site as soon as the error was discovered. Samples were
collected downwind of boreholes instead of test pits because the test pit operation had
been completed by the time the proper cartridges were received from the CLP laboratory.
The first day's borehole sample was collected downwind of RW24, whereas the second
day's borehole sample was collected downwind of RD24. The PUF ambient air samples
were collected approximately 5 feet above ground to limit the effects of ground cover
vegetation on contaminant levels and to collect a sample representative of concentrations
that occur in the breathing zone.
Eight PUF samples were collected during the 2-day sampling event. In addition, one field
blank and one field replicate were sent to the contract laboratory for QA/QC analysis.
The field blank was prepared by unwrapping the cartridge from the aluminum foil,
exposing it to the ambient air, and rewrapping it for shipment to the CLP laboratory.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 9
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI
Following sample collection, the PUF samples were returned to the sample preparation
area where the cartridges were wrapped in aluminum foil, placed in tin cans with
absorbent charcoal packing, and put in coolers for shipment. Sample custody was
maintained by the CH2M HILL project team until samples were shipped the same evening
to the designated CLP laboratory. Custody seals placed on the coolers by the
CH2M HILL project team confirmed that the chain of custody was intact until the
laboratory received the samples. The sample numbers, types, dates of sample collection
and shipment, and laboratory destinations are listed in Table 7.
GAS PROBE SAMPLING
Gas probe samples were collected in tedlar bags from the two MDNR gas probes (GP04
and GP05) and 10 gas probes installed at the site. Two tedlar bags were collected from
each gas probe. One was used for methane analysis, and the other was used for the
analysis of selected VOCs. Samples were described by using a sample code consisting of
the following parts: the site code (GH); the sample type (LG for landfill gas); the analysis
type (M for methane or V for VOC analysis); the location code (GP01 to GP13)
identifying the gas probe from which the sample was collected; and a number code (01 to
04), identifying the date the sample was collected. A field replicate was represented by an
FR preceding the location code.
Gas probe samples were collected during four sampling events. The number codes
represent the sample events that occurred on the following days:
Sampling Date Number Code
August 8 01
August 10 02
August 22 03
October 18 04
The laboratory did not analyze samples collected during the first sampling event on
August 8. When the samples arrived, the laboratory's instrumentation was not set up for
the analysis of the samples, so the holding time of 24 hours was violated. The samples
were discarded without being analyzed and sampling was performed on August 10 to
replace the samples lost from the first sampling event. The location of each gas probe
sampled at the landfill site is shown in Figure 13.
Gas probes were purged by placing teflon tubing into the probe through a rubber stopper
that sealed the probe at the cap. A personal sampling pump was allowed to pump for
10 minutes to purge 5 to 6 volumes of landfill gas from the gas probe before sample
-------
TABLE 7
G&H LANDFILL SITE
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
PDF AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING
Sample Number
GH-AA-P-UW-01
GH-AA-P-SA-01
GH-AA-P-AL-01
GH-AA-P-BH-01
GH-AA-P-FB-01
GH-AA-P-UW-02
GH-AA-P-SA-02
GH-AA-P-AL-02
GH-AA-P-FRAL-02
GH-AA-P-BH-02
SAS No.
4633E
(TO-10)
E01
E02
EOS
E04
EOS
E06
E07
EOS
EOS
E10
Collection
Laboratory
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
Date
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
Time
1417
1409
1407
1424
1400
1016
1011
1007
1007
1000
Shipment
Date
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
S3 - S-Cubed, CA
-------
GLO65561.FI GAS PROBE 8.5x11 12-04-89
}jX/V< w
// ; i'-CO-V
•'/\ /^ *:^
t /' ;*,•
••'' : .* • :f
/ / \ • '. :
/• \ \ PHASE III :/i
.- / \ *. LANDFILL t.\
I \ \ K
•^:
Ul \\
' \ Q * '
\l* \ S
\\% \ i
\x*^ \:-
N- \ *v •
^\ \
J\ 9> ••
// /yV 5
/ .' .* \ V
Fl
{/
.41
] 1 RESIDENTIAL AREA
I I GP05 GP04 AGP03
rj'J2?K«i»7K3«a«w5OT^
i: GP02 jl I GP°7,~_->^
.1 • / 4 . /? "•»* ~.
=/ ;• kiC
ii r. rv. x
23-MILE ROAD
"****«\**;»% \ PHASE I LANDFILL
""vW
,,,. -N:/^.,
/ N;^ 4 ••. v«.
' -*x 9 *«. /s,
•x / x. >-,
1 n Q
>! COMMERCIAL
I/, AREA
GP10
OIL 4i
SEEPAGE
AREA
*v\ {'" 'Si*^
. ^. \ } ^^
^VHU v.
^^^~^ <^»" '••
v" c-KV^'N
.A>- ; ^ "x/
LEGEND
Landfill Boundary
U.S. EPA Site Fence
Gate
Ditch, stream, or
river
Trail
Railroad grade
(Tracks removed)
Gas Probe
Sampling Location
NOTES: Locations are approximate.
GP04 & GP05 are Michigan DNR
gas probes.
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
FIGURE 13
GAS PROBE
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 8
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 10
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI
collection began. Gas probe sample collection was attempted by evacuating the rigid wall
container, thereby filling an enclosed tedlar bag with gas. Sample gas would not flow into
the tedlar bag because a complete seal could not be obtained on the rigid wall container
and the sample pump could not overcome the leaks in the system. An alternative
sampling method was used whereby the sample gas was pumped directly into the tedlar
bag through the personal sampling pump. Samples were collected using this method for
all four sampling events for consistency.
An HNu photoionization detector equipped with a 10.2-eV lamp was used to screen the
gas probes before purging and sampling took place, and no readings above background
were determined. The day before the first sampling event a magnehelic gauge was placed
on all gas probes. No differences in pressures were noted, so the gauge was not used
during subsequent sampling events.
Tedlar bags were flushed with ultrapure nitrogen before sample collection took place.
Two blanks were prepared for each sampling event by filling tedlar bags directly with
ultrapure nitrogen. During each gas probe sampling event, two gas probes were selected
from which a second set of samples was collected. One set of samples was used as a field
replicate, the other for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis.
i When sample collection was complete, the samples were tagged and placed in coolers
1 protected from light to avoid photochemical reactions. Sample custody was maintained by
the CH2M HILL project team until samples were shipped to the designated CLP
laboratory. Custody seals placed on the coolers by the project team confirmed that the
chain of custody was intact until the laboratory received the samples. Table 8 documents
the sample numbers, types, sample collection times, dates of shipment, and laboratory
destinations.
SAMPLE RESULTS
Data summaries from the landfill gas and ambient air sampling are presented in Technical
Memorandum No. 10.
sk/GLT863/075.50
-------
05-Jan-90
(Page 1 of 2)
TABLE 8
G&H LANDFILL SITE
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
GAS PROBE SAMPLING
Sample Number
GH-LG-M-GP08-01
GH-LG-M-GP12-01
GH-LG-M-FRGP12-01
GH-LG-M-GP11-01
GH-LG-M-GP11-01
GH-LG-M-GP07-01
GH-LG-M-GP05-01
GH-LG-M-GP02-01
GH-LG-M-GP06-01
GH-LG-M-GP01-01
GH-LG-M-GP03-01
GH-LG-M-GP10-01
GH-LG-M-GP04-01
GH-LG-M-GP09-01
GH-LG-M-FB01-01
GH-LG-M-TB01-01
SAS No.
(511B)
E141
E142
E143
E144
E144
E145
E153
E154
E163
E164
E165
E166
E167
E168
E169
E170
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Sample Number
GH-LG-V-GP08-01
GH-LG-V-GP12-01
GH-LG-V-FRGP12-01
GH-LG-V-GP11-01
GH-LG-V-GP11-01
GH-LG-V-GP07-01
GH-LG-V-GP05-01
GH-LG-V-GP02-01
GH-LG-V-GP06-01
GH-LG-V-GP01-01
GH-LG-V-GP03-01
GH-LG-V-GP10-01
GH-LG-V-GP04-01
GH-LG-V-GP09-01
GH-LG-V-FB01-01
GH-LG-V-TB01-01
SAS No.
AR1 1P
HO IIC
(8240)
E146
EU7
E148
E149
E149
E150
E151
E152
E155
E156
E157
E158
E159
E160
E161
E162
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Collection
Date
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
i
Time
0912
0930
0930
0945
0945
1002
1622
1534
1439
1448
1414
1523
1606
1506
1708
1710
Sh ipment
Date
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
Sample Number
GH-LG-M-GP01-02
GH-LG-M-GP02-02
GH-LG-M-GP03-02
GH-LG-M-GP04-02
GH-LG-M-GP05-02
GH-LG-M-GP06-02
GH-LG-M-GP07-02
GH-LG-M-GP08-02
GH-LG-M-FRGP08-02
GH-LG-M-GP09-02
GH-LG-M-GP10-02
GH-LG-M-GP11-02
GH-LG-M-GP12-02
GH-LG-M-FB02-02
GH-LG-M-TB02-02
SAS No.
/IM 1C
HO I 1C
(511B)
E171
E172
E173
E174
E175
E176
E177
E178
E179
E180
E181
E182
E183
E184
E185
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Sample Number
GH-LG-V-GP01-02
GH-LG-V-GP02-02
GH-LG-V-GP03-02
GH-LG-V-GP04-02
GH-LG-V-GP05-02
GH-LG-V-GP06-02
GH-LG-V-GP07-02
GH-LG-V-GP08-02
GH-LG-V-FRGP08-02
GH-LG-V-GP09-02
GH-LG-V-GP10-02
GH-LG-V-GP11-02
GH-LG-V-GP12^02
GH-LG-V-FB02-02
GH-LG-V-TB02-02
SAS No.
/Q1 1C
HO I 1C
(8240)
E186
E187
E188
E189
E190
E191
E192
E200
E193
E194
E195
E196
E197
E198
E199
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Collection
Date
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
i
Time
1015
0744
0910
0910
0950
1008
0850
0819
0819
1150
1210
0836
0804
1500
1500
Shipment
Date
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
RADIAN - Radian Corporation, CA
-------
05-Jan-90
(Page 2 of 2)
TABLE 8
G&H LANDFILL SITE
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
GAS PROBE SAMPLING
Sample Number
GH-LG-M-GP01-03
GH-LG-M-GP02-03
GH-LG-M-GP03-03
GH-LG-M-GP04-03
GH-LG-M-GP05-03
GH-LG-M-GP06-03
GH-LG-M-GP07-03
GH-LG-M-GP08-03
GH-LG-M-FRGP08-03
GH-LG-M-GP09-03
GH-LG-M-GP10-03
GH-LG-M-GP11-03
GH-LG-M-GP12-03
GH-LG-M-FB03-03
GH-LG-M-TB03-03
Sample Number
GH-LG-M-TB01-04
GH-LG-M-FB01-04
GH-LG-M-GP01-04
GH-LG-M-GP02-04
GH-LG-M-GP03-04
GH-LG-M-GP04-04
GH-LG-M-GP05-04
GH-LG-M-GP06-04
GH-LG-M-GP07-04
GH-LG-M-FRGP07-04
GH-LG-M-GP08-04
GH-LG-M-GP09-04
GH-LG-M-GP10-04
GH-LG-M-GP11-04
GH-LG-M-GP12-04
SAS No.
AA11P
to 1 ic
(511B)
E201
£202
E203
E204
E205
E206
E207
E208
£209
E210
E211
E212
E213
E214
E215
SAS No.
AOA7C
HTO/C
(511B)
£06
E07
EOS
£09
£10
£11
£12
£13
E14
E15
E16
E17
E18
E19
£20
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Sample Number
GH-LG-V-GP01-03
GH-LG-V-GP02-03
GH-LG-V-GP03-03
GH-LG-V-GP04-03
GH-LG-V-GP05-03
GH-LG-V-GP06-03
GH-LC-V-GP07-03
GH-LG-V-GP08-03
GH-LG-V-FRGP08-03
GH-LG-V-GP09-03
GH-LG-V-GP10-03
GH-LG-V-GP11-03
GH-LG-V-GP12-03
GH-LG-V-FB03-03
GH-LG-V-TB03-03
Sample Number
GH-LG-V-TB01-04
GH-LG-V-FB01-04
GH-LG-V-GP01-04
GH-LG-V-GP02-04
GH-LG-V-GP03-04
GH-LG-V-GP04-04
GH-LG-V-GP05-04
GH-LG-V-GP06-04
GH-LG-V-GP07-04
GH-LG-V-FRGP07-04
GH-LG-V-GP08-04
GH-LG-V-GP09-04
GH-LG-V-GP10-04
GH-LG-V-GP11-04
GH-LG-V-GP12-04
SAS No.
AR1 1C
HO I 1C
(8240)
E216
£217
£218
£219
E220
E221
£222
£223
£224
E225
E226
£227
£228
£229
E230
SAS No.
/ OfiTC
*»yof c
(8240)
E21
£22
£23
E24
E25
E26
£27
£28
E29
E30
£31
£32
£33
£34
E35
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Collection
Date
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
Collection
Date
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
Time
1335
0905
1225
1255
1310
1325
1005
1020
1020
1355
1415
0950
0925
1300
1300
Time
1100
1100
1536
1344
1506
1600
1610
1525
1306
1306
1223
1454
1422
1246
1327
Shipment
Date
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
-
Sn i pment
Date
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
RADIAN - Radian Corporation, CA
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
TO: Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA
FROM: Isaac Johnson/GLO
PREPARED
BY: Cathy Kantowski/GLO
DATE: January 3, 1990
SUBJECT: Round 3 Groundwater Sampling
G&H Landfill Phase III RI
PROJECT: GLO65561.FI.FQ
INTRODUCTION
From October 16 through 19, 1989, groundwater and landfill gas samples were collected as
part of the Round 3 sampling effort of the Phase III remedial investigation (RI) at the
G&H Landfill site. This technical memorandum summarizes groundwater monitoring well
sampling field activities. Water level measurements were also taken concurrently with
monitoring well sampling.
OBJECTIVES
The general objectives of the Phase III field activities were to collect additional data for
evaluating public health risks from site contaminants and to develop and evaluate remedial
action alternatives for the site. Specific objectives were to:
• Collect data to support and complete a quantitative risk assessment
• Estimate more accurately the size and characteristics of the contaminant source
areas and to help select and evaluate remedial alternatives that will contain,
reduce, remove, or destroy contaminant sources
• Improve the understanding of site hydrogeology to evaluate potential
contaminant pathways
• Evaluate and select remedial alternatives for groundwater treatment by analysis
of SAS conventional parameters
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
Page 2
January 3, 1990
GLO65561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
APPROACH
To meet the foregoing objectives, 63 monitoring wells were sampled. Samples were
obtained from 47 new monitoring wells installed as part of the Round 2, Phase III RI.
The 16 existing monitoring wells that were sampled were chosen to compare with previous
analytical results, to provide additional information for the risk assessment, and to achieve
the objectives for groundwater analysis listed previously. Specific data quality objectives
were detailed in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP).
PERSONNEL
CH2M HILL personnel and their responsibilities during the investigation were:
Team Member Responsibility
Isaac Johnson
Bryan Laude
Anne Stumpf
Cathy Kantowski
Hugh Allerton
Jeff Glenny
James Adams
Project Manager
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member,
Site Safety Coordinator
Sample Team Member/Documentation
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Glen Turchan from Connestoga-Rovers & Associates was onsite representing the PRPs
and observing groundwater sampling techniques.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
Groundwater samples were collected from October 16 to 19. Samples were submitted to
laboratories in the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) for Routine Analytical
Services (RAS) and Special Analytical Services (SAS) parameters. RAS parameters
consisted of target compound list inorganic analytes, volatile and semivolatile organic
compounds, pesticides, and PCBs. The SAS conventional parameters requested were oil
and grease, BOD, COD, TOC, total phosphate, TDS, alkalinity, chloride, ammonia, nitrate
plus nitrite, and sulfate.
Detailed sampling procedures, equipment descriptions, and responsibilities are discussed in
the QAPP, approved October 21, 1988, and approved Revision 4 to the QAPP, March 3,
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
Page 3
January 3, 1990
GLO65561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
1989. Revisions 1, 2, and 3 were incorporated in the original QAPP. All sampling was
conducted as described in the QAPP, except for the necessary field modifications described
herein.
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING
Groundwater samples were collected from 16 existing monitoring wells and 47 recently
installed wells at the site between July 24 and 28. Sampling locations are shown in
Figure 1.
Seven replicates, six field blanks, and five trip blanks were collected as QA/QC checks.
The trip blanks were made using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) water
in the field trailer and shipped to the laboratory with the samples for volatile organic
compound analysis. The field blanks were prepared by pouring HPLC water into
decontaminated bailers for organic compounds and metals or commercial deionized water
into decontaminated bailers for conventional parameters and transferring it to appropriate
sample containers. All blanks were preserved and handled as if they were actual samples.
The field blank samples for metals were also filtered.
Static water levels were measured before purging and before samples were collected using
an electronic water level indicator (Table 1). The volume of standing water was calculated
from the water level measurement and the well depth. Monitoring wells that were
adequately recharging were purged of at least five well volumes before sampling. Wells
that did not recharge sufficiently were bailed dry, allowed to recharge, and then sampled
on the same day. All wells were purged using stainless steel bailers. Purge volumes were
measured by emptying the bailer into a 5-gallon bucket and counting the number of
buckets filled. Purge water was disposed of onsite approximately 20 feet from well head
location.
One recently installed well, GH38A, was found to have a visible oil layer, so it was not
sampled. Wells GH16A AND GH21A could not be sampled because the well casings
were bent. Wells GH04A, GH15A, RL09, RL21, RL22, and RW20 were dry so no
samples were obtained.
Wells were sampled immediately after purging using the same bailer as used for purging
the well. The nylon cord suspending each bailer was discarded after each well. A VOA
vial was filled as the first sample from each full bailer. A sample for field parameters was
collected in a separate bottle and returned to the sample preparation area immediately
after sampling for testing. The results of field parameter testing are presented in Table 2.
-------
Page 1 of 3
TABLE 1
Croundwater Elevations
C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
Technical Memorandum No. 9
wel 1
Number
CH01B
CH01C
CH02A
CH02B
CH02C
CH03A
CH03B
CH03C
CH04A
CH04B
CH04C
CH05A
CH06A
CH06B
CH07A
CH08A
CH08B
CH08C
CH09A
CH09B
CH1 18
CH12A
CH12B
CH13B
CH14A
CH14B
CH14C
CH15A
CH15B
CH15C
CH16A
CH16B
CH16C
GH17B
CH17C
CH18B
CH19A
CH19B
CH20A
CH20B
Date
Recorded
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
Top of casing
Elevation (a)
(ft ms I )
688
690
688
688
685
687
687
689
688
691
700
695
695
684
683
684
683
688
687
696
694
697
704
704
707
707
707
710
708
709
704
703
707
696
697
690
689
.60
.20
(0
.34
.20
.69
.93
.22
.00
.61
.00
.21
.42
.40
.42
.24
.40
.60
.15
.61
.20
.09
(C)
.24
(C)
.45
.50
.31
.33
.66
.07
.44
.28
.41
.98
. 11
.03
.59
.02
.89
Depth to
water below
top of cas i ng
(ft)
6
20
4
5
19
4
6
5
14
22
17
10
10
10
13
13
14
9
8
10
8
8
8
8
8
30
14
48
.83
.20
.11 *
.76
.05
.41
.32
.92
dry
.22
.23
.37
.01
.04
.35
.57
.30
.12
.17
.61
.03
.27
.40 *
.30
.11
.37
.44
dry
.81
.94
Water
(b) Elevat
(ft ms
681.
670.
-
682.
669.
681.
681 .
681 .
-
674.
668.
682.
685.
685.
674.
669.
671.
669.
678.
679.
686.
685.
-
688.
-
696.
674.
-
692.
658.
I eve I
ion
I)
77
00
--
58
15
28
61
30
--
39
77
84
41
36
07
67
10
48
98
00
17
82
--
94
--
08
06
--
52
72
casing bent —
13
31
12
16
11
7
9
7
7
.28
.90
.72
.02
. 12
.54
. 10
.32
.23
695.
677.
691 .
687.
695.
688.
688.
682.
682.
16
38
69
96
99
49
49
70
66
-------
Page 2 of 3
TABLE 1
Croundwater Elevations
C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
Technical Memorandum No. 9
we 1 1
Number
CH21A
CH22A
CH22B
CH23A
CH24A
CH25A
CH26A
CH27A
CH28A
CH28B
CH29A
CH29B
CH29C
CH30A
CH30B
CH31A
CH31B
CH31C
CH32A
CH33A
CH33B
CH34A
CH34B
CH35A
CH35B
CH36A
CH36B
CH37A
CH38A
CH39A
CH40A
CH40B
CH41B
CH42B
CH43A
CH43B
CH44A
CH45A
I 03
I 05
Date
Recorded
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
Top Of
Elevat
(ft ms
688.
692.
692.
668.
688.
687.
690.
704.
701.
701.
694.
693.
695.
697.
697.
696.
697.
697.
691.
688.
688.
688.
687.
697.
697.
695.
696.
695.
700.
686.
687.
687.
688.
689.
691.
692.
691.
693.
693.
697.
cas ing
ion (a)
I)
94
04
72
94
22
17
79 *
89
48
87
83
96
47
28
18
98
70
35
81
93
79
11
75
71
63
56
17
06
55
73
41
47
33
64
19
32
69
43
53 *
26 *
Depth
water
top of
(ft)
4.
4.
36,
13.
4.
5.
7.
11 .
10.
10.
9.
8.
10.
10.
9.
9.
10.
13.
7.
4.
4.
6.
5.
11.
11.
5.
6.
5.
12.
3.
4.
4.
4.
14.
11 .
12.
11.
14.
4.
10.
to
below
cas ing
36
21
83
87
34
06
68 *
61
36
78
44
08
02
04
95
98
72
67
72
94
57
90
84
94
76
68
27
54
73
46
27
32
00
77
73
65
92
25
50 •
70 '
Water
(b) Elevat
(ft ms
684.
687.
655.
655.
683.
682.
683.
693.
691 .
691 .
685.
685.
685.
687.
687.
687.
686.
683.
684.
683.
684.
681 .
681 .
685.
685.
689.
689.
689.
687.
683.
683.
683.
684.
674.
679.
679.
679.
679.
689.
686.
I eve I
ion
I)
58
83
89
07
88
11
11
28
12
09
39
88
45
24
23
00
98
68
09
99
22
21
91
77
87
88
90
52
82
27
14
15
33
87
46
67
77
18
03
56
-------
Page 3 of 3
TABLE 1
Croundwater Elevations
C&H LANDFILL PHASE I I I Rl
Technical Memorandum No. 9
we 1 1
Number
RD02X
RD08XX
RD18
RD24
RL04
RL06
RL09
RL10
RL17
RL21
RL22
RL23
RL29
RW05
RW07
RW10
RW12X
RW14
RW19
RW20
RW21
RW22
RW23
RW24
RW30
Date
Recorded
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
Top Of
Elevat
(ft ms
708.
708.
711.
708.
708.
709.
708.
709.
709.
710.
709.
707 .
710.
710.
709.
709.
706.
706.
711.
710.
710.
709.
707.
709.
712.
casing
Ion (a)
I)
30
08 •
07
04
31
90
00
93
27
42
42
10
18
45
06
80
06
69
70
78
69
49
65
24
65
Depth
water
top o
(ft)
14
18
20
17
16
18
16
21
14
28
21
18
14
18
20
20
20
19
18
18
20
to
below
f casing
.84
.59 *
.00
.22
.02
.44
dry
.22
.42
dry
dry
.43
.10
.08
.35
.59
.56
.64
.13
dry
.16
.87
.17
.34
.84
Water
(b) Elevat
(ft ms
693.
689.
691.
690.
692.
691.
-
693.
687.
-
-
692.
682.
689.
690.
695.
687.
686.
691 .
-
690.
689.
689.
690.
691 .
level
ion
I)
46
49
07
82
29
46
—
71
85
--
--
67
08
37
71
21
50
05
57
--
53
62
48
90
81
(a) Top of casing measurements refer to inner casing (riser) without PVC
coupling, MSL is referenced to a USCS datum.
(b) Assumed top of casing measurements refer to inner casing (riser) without
PVC coup Ii ng
(c) NO top of casing elevation available.
* Measurements from the top of outer (protective) casing
— Not appli cable
-------
\: ;;l -H Vs X,^ ®GH15B,C | | RESSOe^TJALAHEA
x/,. WO * ^ ""Vr^--Jr 2s^
\ \ ''••:•-. : '.• -•: ••: •: •:• •:• •:• •:• ;• .• .-. .-. .-. .-. -. •. -.- -.- ~~" * ~ ~ it - „ ~ - X - — X " *" X x
l -. •:-. -•• •• •• • v v *.-- — x — x *
Ax. \\ "\*
"-•,:• \,,v '. V- '•-
-.. •• / ^ •••-,. \' •. i 't - V
'''::. ,+ \ '"'•-: ,+ * V - £v . : :
'I jf ••' '''C\ " .#'-'' Ok \ •••!-. :•:•:''•"'• . QniQ
^^ :' '• •• +f*. -. ^P '•..' ' •-•'. "'..'••, -^ r\U I O % : -•
. // • ""^ GH^2^-? " \ ""'• ". _ RL06 ARL04 J;
•:. '/ L ^'"**<<\ ^,! ;>-\, \\ * ii
:- v ' '•" :•; '•• 'f $ :• <• ' ' •:• ... .. ..-• '•• •:•'.;. *• •' ":. * • :
;;•: ' ;j; :: . '*'• \\. '' '•: .;. ': : :.:
' j.*" « •: .- '' ""••-. ' **>
v ?r : !l ^,. \ ?^. - ;:
\ t. i !: S *r%. *X'*%, ^ A PHASE i LANDFILL
V 'V, - '? - "*^ 'V /^,..GH37A ^ p*
\ \ PHASE HI ^,= j -^ f^^^ \x gSg
\ « LANDFILL f ;j - '^j. x-. ;'::>,... ^ 9 RW21
\ 1 i\ -; : k y^., 'f x,"';:':-:- .=:
* •:•: « '••• : •:•: "*>. '\. v:- . ••:'
\ \ RL29 Gft304,B« "y%^ '•—C'&v.
\ \ * ®? > I ''::<'*:>., '":-- ?**... RW22
\ '^ 3 '• ? '*^.f. * V. '"*,:.. fl. ®
* =;x « / .::: ..•'.•:.-.•.•-. '?*#,. ""••-.. "'::.5:... « w RW10
\ •;• •*';*•'/' ""•<::. .'/ "-:;^, ;'•,, •v-::<.:.. RD8XX
\ S .^ ;:;:•' •->,... .0' ':%. "X..",;.,.
\ ••> .-• -••>:• -• >:• '•••: . .- '•'.-:-. ' :- '••'.-:.
* •:- .-• -.- -.- • .;-.. .:.- *:. . t .. •:-> ,
H ^ ^V V s '"^, / "^^ '''••<::%,.
\ ?. xi S; "-:: -.. ,.•" ' '':>x * ,. 'x?.:. .
^;,. \ \ 0|: | ^ PHASE II LAMOFILL "**¥. '^^vN*. x,""
HUE ROAD
X X X X — X ~x~ \
I/ '- • " s "'••••' H i
» •- . ® :GH27A « i! 1
Si\ '". i ! \ H
i ^ = AUTO^OBiLE 1
...f.;k.. YARO jl
! i? «' HI
:;: ; i /, ||
g GH2.8:A!B. ..-V ff
• .' i . •
1 // i\ 1
RW23 \ K I I g
\ GH36A.B I 0 £K
"'•!• ' :• Z :
::: A | 1 yi; i; u;
::: GH19B .,.,,.,™^Xi; i S
x •" i "^5 :• C<5
« • i H U;
; ^ I j \ ce
GH14A ^
North
t
0 300
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
ii ::«:*«:::;:::*:::*:::::::¥:::::: LANDFILL BOUNDARY
x x x x U.S. EPA SITE FENCE
^ GATE
DITCH, STREAM, OR
••'"••.•• RIVER
,...••:..-;, 'GHOIAiB
GH34A.B.x~...,l. ';:-.-.'.
,"<'"'": • •'••
.•••
.-•
'•- ': ; "'.:
'"•'-.r •••••-.. ..-;^'::
•-• --^ ";',..,// .••-.,...
/' " "•"•• •":.."••- ...
/ ' -"-_".'.'•.•••••
"•-*-,.
~~^'*
•• . .
•• •.'.'"- -
GH45A
•"'sf"
\.
TRAIL
RAILROAD GRADE
(TRACKS REMOVED)
MONITORING WELL
SAMPLING LOCATION
\
FIGURE 1
MONITORING WELL
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 9
-------
page 1 of 2
Table 2
Monitoring wells Field Parameters
C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
Technical Memorandum NO. 9
we I I
Number
CHOI A
CH01B
CH02A
CH03B
CH03C
CH04B
CH08B
CH09A
CH09B
CH12A
FRCH12A
CH14A
CH15B
CH15C
CH19B
CH22A
CH22B
CH24A
CH26A
CH27A
CH28A
CH28B
FRCH28B
CH29A
FRCH29A
CH29B
CH29C
CH30A
CH30B
CH31A
CH31B
CH31C
CH32A
FRCH32A
CH33A
CH33B
CH34A
CH34B
CH35A
CH35B
CH36A
CH36B
CH37A
CH39A
CH40A
CH40B
FRCH40B
CH41B
CH42B
CH43A
CH43B
CH44A
CH45A
103
105
RD08XX
RD18
RD24
RL04
FRRL04
Date
10-18-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10- 16-39
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
Tempe r a t u r e
( C)
11.5
10.7
12.5
12.9
8. 1
9.5
10.2
17.5
17.5
11.6
NM
16.7
16.2
16.9
13.1
11.5
10.3
9.4
10.9
12.1
9.8
10.6
NM
17.9
NM
16.5
17.2
12.9
11.4
12.9
12.3
10.9
11.9
NM
10.2
11.5
13.3
12.5
11.8
12.4
10.7
9.9
13.8
11.6
11.5
1 1
NM
10.4
9.9
13.2
12
1 1
15.6
14.1
12.6
10
9.4
8. 1
9.7
NM
PH
(SU)
6.72
8.01
6.68
6.64
7.75
7.11
7.96
7.63
7.59
6.6
NM
7.74
8.33
8.9
7.94
6.91
7.6
6.51
6.68
6.68
7.68
7.09
NM
7.71
NM
8.04
9.35
7 .46
7.42
6.89
7.01
10.08
7.68
NM
6.64
7.49
6.7
7.95
7.7
7.5
6.96
6.81
7.71
6.77
6.8
6.85
NM
6.7
6.77
7.98
7.68
6.72
7.47
8.78
6. 38
6.67
6.56
7.28
6.2
NM
speci f ic
conduct ivi ty
(umhos/cm at
25 deg. O
616
588
1200
1451
287
870
852
1294
1235
1093
NM
839
728
430
577
959
567
1453
627
943
862
562
NM
1224
NM
602
355
1781
1923
1847
2386
432
1694
NM
1648
1562
1044
933
1087
1471
2381
2292
1289
820
1370
1528
NM
1271
688
1322
1216
1389
1355
1151
2128
1000
872
529
1873
NM
purged
vo I ume
(gal Ions)
4
5
5.5
18
19
3
6
6
10
4
(a)
NR
17
30
4
3
2. 5
7.5
6
5
6
21
(a)
6
(a)
15
NR
10
16
10
17
10
8
(a)
8
17
7
18
2.5
16
15
24
5
6.7
7
18
(a)
18
21
5
17
6
NR
3
5.5
16
15
26
3
(a)
comments/
Observat ions
si ight oi 1 sheen
purged dry after 5 gallons
--
--
Purged dry after 19 gallons
Purged dry after 3 gallons
--
slight odor in purge bucket, small oily sheen
slight oily sheen on water
--
--
--
--
--
Purged dry after 3 gallons, very slow recharge
water was dark gray and had a slight oily odor
SI ight odor
--
--
--
--
--
Purged dry
--
--
Purged dry after 10 gallons
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
si ight oi ly odor
--
--
--
--
--
--
slight oily sheen in bucket
--
--
Purged dry alter 3 gallons
--
--
--
--
--
--
-------
page 2 of 2
Table 2
Monitoring wells Field Parameters
C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
Technical Memorandum NO. 9
wel 1
Number
RL06
RL29
FRRL29
RW10
RW14
RW21
RW22
RW23
FRRW23
RW24
RW30
FB01
FB02
FB03
FB04
FB05
FB06
Date
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10- 18-89
10-19-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
Temperature
( C)
8. 1
12.5
MM
7.5
9.5
9
9.7
9
MM
6.8
9 .6
MM
NM
NM
NM
14.2
NM
PH
(SU)
6.4
6.35
NM
6.31
6.9
6.56
6.45
6.65
NM
6.54
6.69
NM
NM
NM
NM
7 .98
NM
spec! r ic
Conduct ivi ty
(umhos/cm at
25 deg. c)
1511
2533
NM
2138
2029
1176
1412
1029
NM
2044
1156
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
Purged
vo 1 ume
(gal Ions)
2
5
(a)
2
8
8
9
9
(a)
5
6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
comments/
Observat ions
strong oily odor and oil sheen in bucket
Purged dry after 5 gallons
--
septic-type odor, purged dry after 2 gallons
Oily odor
--
sept ic-type odor
--
--
Odor f rom wel 1 . oily sheen in samp le
Oily odor
--
--
--
--
--
--
NOTE:
FR - Field Repl icate
NM - Not Measured
NR - Not Recorded
NA - Not applicable
(a) The field replicate samples were taken immediately after collection of the
initial field sample bottles. The well was not purged between initial and field
replicate sample collections.
-- NO comments/observations recorded
-------
page 1 of 2
Table 3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
MONITORING WELLS
C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
Technical Memorandum NO. 9
Laboratory
sample Number
CH-CWCH01A-03
CH-CWCH01B-03
CH-CWCH02A-03
CH-CWCH03B-03
CH-CWCH03C-03
CH-CWCH04B-03
CH-CWCH08B-03
CH-CWCH09A-03
CH-CWCH09B-03
CH-CWCH12A-03
CH-FRCWCH12A-03
CH-CWCH14A-03
CH-CWCH15B-03
CH-CWCH15C-03
CH-CWCH19B-03
CH-CWCH22A-03
CH-CWCH22B-03
CH-CWCH24A-03
CH-CWCH26A-03
CH-CWCH27A-03
CH-CWCH28A-03
CH-CWCH28B-03
CH-FRCWCH28B-03
CH-CWCH29A-03
CH-FRCWCH29A-03
CH-CWCH29B-03
CH-CWCH29C-03
CH-CWCH30A-03
CH-CWCH30B-03
CH-CWCH31A-03
a-l-CWCH31B-03
CH-CWCH31C-03
CH-CWCH32A-03
CH-FRCWCH32A-03
CH-CWCH33A-03
CH-CWaH33B-03
CH-CWCH34A-03
CH-CWCH34B-03
CH-CWCH35A-03
Q-1-CWCH358-03
CH-CWCH36A-03
CH-CWCH36B-03
CH-CWCH37A-03
CH-CWCH39A-03
CH-CWCH40A-03
CH-CWCH40B-03
CH-FRCWCH40B-03
CH-CWCH41B-03
CH-CWCH42B-03
CH-CWCH43A-03
CH-CWCH43B-03
CH-CWCH44A-03
CH-CWCH45A-03
CH-CWI03-03
CH-CWI05-03
CH-CWRD08XX-03
CH-CWRD18-03
CH-CWRD24-03
CH-CWRL04-03
OTR NO.
EEY61
EEY62
EEY39
EEYOO
EEY01
EEY32
EEY02
EEY03
EEY04
EEY40
EEY74
EEY05
EEY06
EEY07
EEY08
EEY63
EEY64
EEY41
EEY42
EEY09
EEY10
EEY1 1
EEY71
EEY12
EEY69
EEY13
EEY14
EEY15
EEY16
EEY17
EEY18
EEY19
EEY28
EEY47
EEY20
EEY29
EEY21
EEY22
EEY30
EEY31
EEY23
EEY24
EEY25
EEY33
EEY73
EEY51
EEY27
EEY34
EEY35
EEY52
EEY53
EEY54
EEY55
EEY65
EEY43
EEY66
EEY44
EEY56
EEY45
ITR NO.
MEBF61
MEBF62
MEBF39
MEBFOO
MEBF01
MEBF32
MEBF02
MEBF03
MEBF04
MEBF40
MEBF74
MEBF05
ME8F06
MEBF07
MEBF08
MEBF63
MEBF64
MEBF41
MEBF42
MEBF09
MEBF10
MEBF1 1
MEBF71
MEBF12
MEBF69
MEBF13
MEBF 14
MEBF15
MEBF16
MEQF17
MEBF18
MEBF19
MEBF28
MEBF47
MEBF20
MEBF29
MEBF21
MEBF22
MEBF30
MEBF31
MEBF23
MEBF24
MEBF25
MEBF33
MEBF73
MEBF51
MEBF27
MEBF34
MEBF35
MEBF52
MEBF53
MEBF54
MEBF55
MEBF65
MEBF43
MEBF66
MEBF44
MEBF56
MEBF45
SAS NO.
4987E
..
--
E36
--
--
--
--
--
--
E41
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
E45
E43
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
E03
E04
--
£05
--
--
E02
E01
--
--
--
E39
E40
--
--
E42
E44
--
--
--
--
--
E38
--
E48
--
E49
col
Date
10-18-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10- 16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10- 16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10- 18-89
10- 18-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10- 18-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10- 17-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10- 16-89
10-17-89
10- 18-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
lect ion
Time
1245
1710
1530
1745
1731
1515
1651
1506
1520
1605
1605
1515
1 130
1239
1655
1135
1135
0847
1135
1030
0853
0922
0922
1219
1219
1157
1209
1355
1415
0932
0912
1028
1152
1152
1050
0855
1647
0914
1027
1105
0920
0950
1440
1528
1424
1451
1451
1658
0932
1402
1434
1130
1605
1442
1440
1645
1340
0930
1526
Shipment
Date
10- 18-89
10- 17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10- 16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10- 18-89
10- 18-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10- 16-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
Organics .
compounds
COMPU
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
COMPU
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
Me t a I s
KEYTX
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
convent ional
Parameters
--
ICM
--
--
--
--
--
--
ICM
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
ICM
--
ICM
ICM
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
--
--
--
--
ICM
ICM
ICM
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table 3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
MONITORING WELLS
C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
Technical Memorandum NO. 9
Laboratory
sample Number
CH-FRCWRL04-03
CH-CWRL06-03
CH-CWRL29-03
CH-FRCWRL29-03
CH-CWRW10-03
CH-CWRW14-03
CH-CWRW21-03
CH-CWRW22-03
CH-CWRW23-03
CH-CWRW24-03
CH-CWRW30-03
CH-CWFB01-03
CH-CWFB02-03
CH-CWFB03-03
CH-CWFB04-03
CH-CWFB05-03
CH-CWFB06-03
CH-CWTB01-03
CH-CWTB02-03
CH-CWTB03-03
CH-CWTB04-03
CH-CWTB06-03
OTR NO.
EEY48
EEY46
EEY57
EEY76
EEY58
EEY67
EEY36
EEY37
EEY38
EEY59
EEY60
EEY49
EEY50
EEY68
EEY70
EEY72
EEY75
EFQ76
EFQ77
EFQ78
EFQ79
EEY99
ITR NO. •
MEBF48
MEBF46
MEBF57
MEBF76
MEBF58
ME8F67
MEBF36
MEBF37
MEBF38
MEBF59
MEBF60
MEBF49
MEBF50
MEBF68
MEBF70
MEBF72
MEBF75
--
--
--
--
SAS NO.
4987E
£53
£46
--
--
--
--
£50
E51
E52
--
--
E37
£47
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
col
Date
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
lect ion
Time
1526
1053
1720
1720
1152
1325
1510
1535
1602
0852
1449
1330
1320
1610
1620
1200
1610
1445
1530
1320
1400
1315
Shipment
Date
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
Organics .
compounds
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
Me t a I s
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
--
--
--
convent ional
Parameters
I CM
ICM
--
--
--
--
ICM
ICM
ICM
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
.-
--
--
--
--
--
--
FR - Field Repl icate
FB - Field Blank
TB - Trip Blank
PEI - PEI Associates, inc.. OH
WEYER - Weyerhaeuser company. WA
COMPU - compuchem Laboratories. NC
KEYTX - Keystone Environmental Resources. TX
ICM - industrial corrosion Management. NJ
-- - Not sampled
conventional parameters include oil and grease. BOD. COD. TOC. total phosphate. TDS.
alkalinity, chloride, ammonia, nitrate plus nitrite, and sulfate.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
Page 4
January 3, 1990
GL065561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Following sample collection, the bottles were returned to the sample preparation area,
decontaminated in a trisodium phosphate and tap water solution, and rinsed with deionized
water. The metals samples were filtered and the samples were preserved according to the
provisions of the QAPP. After preservation, samples were placed in iced coolers. Sample
custody was maintained by the CH2M HILL project team until samples were shipped to
the designated CLP laboratory. Table 3 documents sample numbers, types, dates of
shipment, and collection and laboratory destinations.
DECONTAMINATION PRACTICES
Stainless steel bailers used for sampling wells were decontaminated between sample
locations. Bailers were washed with a trisodium phosphate and tap water solution, a tap
water rinse, a 10-percent methanol and water solution, and rinsed with deionized water
and air dried.
bcb/GLT863/073.50
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PREPARED BY:
RE:
PROJECT:
Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA
Isaac H. Johnson
July 21, 1989
Jan Williams
Round 1, 2, and 3 Analytical Results and Data Validation
Phase III RI
G&H Landfill
GLO65561.DE.DV
INTRODUCTION
This technical memorandum presents the analytical data collected during the Round I, II,
and III Field Sampling as part of the Phase III RI at the G&H Landfill site, and the
quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) evaluation of those data. The purpose of data
validation is to verify that the QA/QC requirements of a data set have been met, to
characterize the weaknesses of questionable data (possibly limiting its use), and to
determine which data are unusable.
The QA/QC procedures are documented in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)
for this project (CH2M HILL 1988) and include both field sampling and laboratory
analysis. Data review is performed by U.S. EPA's Region 5 Central Regional Laboratory
(CRL) according to regional SOPs based on the Laboratory Data Validation Functional
Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (U.S. EPA 1988), and the Laboratory Data
Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organics Analyses (U.S. EPA 1988). These
reviews, plus additional observations by CH2M HILL, are incorporated into the final data
validation written for each set of data before its use. QA/QC, data review procedures,
and the results of the data validation for the G&H Landfill site are summarized below.
FIELD AND LABORATORY QA/QC
The analyses discussed below are made to characterize the quality of a data set. They
consist of analyzing blank, duplicate, field replicate, and spike samples to evaluate data
precision, accuracy, and contamination. The results of the QA/QC analyses are discussed
along with the raw analytical data, and are used for data review and validation.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 2
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
BLANKS
A blank is a clean sample equivalent that is processed and analyzed as a sample to
determine the existence and magnitude of potential contamination introduced during
sampling or analysis. In the field, High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
water is used for aqueous blanks, and clean sands are used for soil blanks. Blanks are
treated with the same procedures as samples from the field through laboratory analysis
and reporting. Laboratory preparation blanks (reagent blanks) are prepared from
contaminant-free water in the laboratory and processed along with the samples through
each sample preparation and analysis step. Field blanks identify contamination from
decontamination, sampling, bottle transport, and laboratory procedures. Trip blanks
identify contamination from bottles and bottle transport. Laboratory blanks identify
laboratory contamination.
QUANTITATION LIMITS
A quantitation limit is the minimum amount of a chemical that can be consistently
detected and quantified. An individual laboratory's detection limits may be lower than the
Contract Required Quantitation Limits (CRQL) or Contract Required Detection Limits
(CRDL) for inorganic compounds established for the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).
In this case, data lower than the CRQL or CRDL are reported; these data are considered
estimated because the accuracy of quantitation below these levels is uncertain.
Contamination or other analytical problems (such as low sample recoveries) may cause the
actual quantitation limit to be higher than that reported by the laboratory. When this
occurs, it is noted in the laboratory validation writeup. Tables 10-1 and 10-2 present the
target compounds or elements that were analyzed by the CLP laboratories and the CRQLs
and CRDLs.
SPIKE RECOVERIES
Spike sample analyses are done to determine the effect of the sample matrix on extraction,
digestion, and measurement procedures. Spike recoveries are also used to determine the
accuracy of the analyses, which is a measure of the agreement between an experimental
determination and the true value of the parameter being measured. In general, a known
amount of compound is added to a sample, the sample is analyzed, and the amount of
spike compound recovered by analysis is compared to the amount added. The type of
spikes vary from organic to inorganic analyses and from low to high concentration analyses.
A "surrogate spike" in organic analysis is a compound not expected to be present in
environmental samples, but with properties similar to those of the target compounds. It is
added to all samples before extraction and other sample preparation. Percent recovery
(%R) is calculated by the formula:
-------
Table 10-1
TARGET ANALYTE LIST AND
.CONTRACT-REQUIRED DETECTION LIMITS
Detection Limit
Inorganic Target Low Concentration Analysis3
Analyte Water (ug/1)
Aluminum 200
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200
Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5,000
Chromium 10
Cobalt 50
Copper 25
Iron 100
Lead 5
Magnesium 5,000
Manganese 15
Mercury 0.2
Nickel 40
Potassium 5,000
Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5,000
Thallium 10
Vanadium 50
Zinc 20
Cyanide 10
aThe detection limits for samples may be considerably higher
depending on the sample matrix.
[12/87]
GLT863/035.50
-------
Table 10-2 (Page 1 of 3)
TARGET COMPOUND LIST AND
CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTITATION LIMITS
Quantisation Limits
Low Concentration Analysis3
Volatile CAS Number
1. Cbloromethane 74-87-3
2. Bromomethane 7A-83-9
3. Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4
4. Chloroethane 75-00-3
5. Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
6. Acetone 67-64-1
7. Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0
8. 1,1-Dlchloroethene 75-34-4
9. 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-35-3
10. 1,2-DIchloroethene (total) 540-59-0
11. Chloroform 67-66-3
12. 1,2-Dlchloroethane 107-06-2
13. 2-Butanone 78-93-2
14. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6
15. Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5
16. Vinyl Acetate 108-05-4
17. Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4
18. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5
19. 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5
20. Cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-5
21. Trichloroethene 79-01-6
22. Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1
23. 1,1,2-Trlchloroethane 79-00-5
24. Benzene 71-43-2
25. Trans-l,3-Dlchloropropene 10061-01-6
26. Bromoform 75-25-2
27. 2-Hexanone 591-78-6
28. 4-tiethyl-2-pentanone 108-10-1
39. Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4
30. Toluene 108-88-3
31. Chlorobenzene 108-90-7
32. Ethyl Benzene 100-41-4
33. Styrene 100-42-5
34. Xylenes (total) 133-02-7
Semivolatlle
35. Phenol 108-95-2
36. bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4
37. 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8
38. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1
39. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7
40. Benzyl Alcohol 100-51-6
41. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1
42. 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7
43. bls(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 39638-32-9
Water
(Tl 8/D
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Soil/Sedimentb
(]lg/kg)
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
Note: Specific quantitation limits are highly matrix dependent. The quantisation
limits listed herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable.
aQuantltation limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight. The quantitation limits
calculated by the laboratory for soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight as required by the
.contract, will be higher.
"Medium soil/sediment CRQLs for volatile TCL compounds are 100 times the individual low soil/
sediment CRQL; for semlvolatile TCL compounds they are 60 times the individual low soil/sediment
CRQL.
-------
Table 10-2 (Page 2 of 3)
Semivolatile (Continued)
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
4 -Mecnyipnenoj.
N-Nitroso Dipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isopborone
2-Nltrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzole acid
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dlcblorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroanlllne
Hexachlorobutadlene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
CAS Number
1116-44-3
621-64-7
67-72-1
98-95-3
78-59-1
88-75-5
105-67-9
65-85-0
111-91-1
120-83-2
120-82-1
91-20-3
106-47-8
87-68-3
59-50-7
91-57-6
77-47-4
88-06-2
95-95-4
91-58-7
88-74-4
131-11-3
208-96-8
606-20-2
99-09-2
83-32-9
51-28-5
100-02-7
132-64-9
121-14-2
84-66-2
7005-72-3
86-73-7
100-01-6
534-52-1
86-30-6
101-55-3
118-74-1
87-86-5
85-01-8
120-12-7
84-74-2
206-44-0
129-00-0
85-68-7
Note: Specific quantltatlon limits are highly matrix dependent. The quantItation
limits listed herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable.
aQuantitation limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight. The quantitation limits
calculated by the laboratory for soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight as required by the
.contract, will be higher.
"Medium soil/sediment CRQLs for volatile TCL compounds are 100 times the individual low soil/
sediment CRQL; for semlvolatile TCL compounds they are 60 times the individual low soil/sediment
CRQL.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
2 -Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
2 , 4 , 5-Trichlorophenol
2 - Chlo roanaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2 , 6-Dinltrotoluene
3-Nitroanlllne
Acenaphthene
2 , 4-Dinit rophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2 , 4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-nitrosodlphenylamlne
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Dl-n-butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Quantitation Limits
Low Concentration Analysis a
Water
(Tlg/1)
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
1C
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
Soil/Sedimentb
(pg/kg)
33U
330
330
330
330
330
330
1,600
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1,600
330
1,600
330
330
330
1,600
330
1,600
1,600
330
330
330
330
330
1,600
1,600
330
330
330
1,600
330
330
330
330
330
330
-------
Table 10-2 (Page 3 of 3)
Quantisation Limits
Low Concentration Analysis8
Semivolatile (Continued)
89. 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
90. Benzo[a]anthracene
91. Chrysene
92. bls(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
93. Di-n-octyl phthalate
94. Benzo[bjfluoranthene
95. Benzo [k] f luoranthene
96. Benzo[a]pyrene
97. Indenof1,2,3-cd]pyrene
98. Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
99. Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Pesticides/PCBs
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
alpha-BHC
beta-BBC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Heptachlor epoxlde
Endosufan I
Dieldrln
4,4' -DDE
Endrin
Endosulfan II
4, 4' -ODD
Endosulfan Sulf ate
4, 4' -DDT
Endrin Ketone
Methoxychlor
alpha-Chlordane
gamma -Chlo rdane
Toxaphene
Arochlor-1016
Arochlor-1221
Arochlor-1232
Arochlor-1242
Arochlor-1248
CAS Number
91-94-1
56-55-3
218-01-9
117-81-7
117-84-0
205-99-2
207-08-9
50-32-8
193-39-5
53-70-3
191-24-2
319-84-6
319-85-7
319-86-8
58-89-9
76-44-8
309-00-2
1024-57-3
959-98-8
60-57-1
72-55-9
72-20-8
33213-65-9
72-54-8
1031-07-8
50-29-3
53494-70-5
72-43-5
5103-71-9
5103-74-2
8001-35-2
125. Arochlor-1254
126. Arochlor-1260
12674-11-2
11104-28-2
11141-16-5
53469-21-9
12672-29-6
11097-69-1
11096-82-5
Water
(PS/I)
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
Soil/Sedimentb
(Pg/kg)
660
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
160.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
160.0
160.0
Note: Specific quantitation limits are highly matrix dependent. The quantitation
limits listed herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable.
aQuantitation limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight. The quantitation limits
calculated by the laboratory for soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight as required by the
.contract, will be higher.
"Medium soil/sediment CRQLs for volatile TCL compounds are 100 times the individual low soil/
sediment CRQL; for semlvolatlle TCL compounds they are 60 times the individual low soil/sediment
CRQL.
6LT863/036.50
[8/87]
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 3
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
%R = SSR/SA x 100%
where:
SSR = quantity measured in spiked sample
SA = quantity of spike added
A "matrix spike" consists of target compounds added to a sample just before analysis. It
is analogous to the "method spike" done for high concentration inorganic analysis. Both
analyses are performed to evaluate matrix effects on the analytical methodology and data
accuracy.
Percent recovery for a matrix spike is calculated by the formula:
%R = SSR-SR x 100%
where:
SA
SR = quantity measured in unspiked sample
SSR = quantity measured in spiked sample
SA = quantity of spike added
The "method spike" for high concentration inorganics and the "spike sample analysis" for
low and medium inorganic concentrations are the same. The spike is added before any
reagents are added to the sample. Percent recovery is calculated as for a matrix or
method spike.
A recovery above the control limits may indicate a high bias in the data, while a recovery
below the control limits may indicate a low bias and detection limits higher than those
specified by the contract.
DUPLICATES/REPLICATES
Both field replicate and laboratory duplicate samples are analyzed to determine data
precision, a measure of the reproducibility of field sampling and analysis. The results are
reported as relative percent differences (RPD) and calculated by the formula:
RPD = Dl - D2 x 100%
(Dl + D2)/2
where:
Dl = concentration of first duplicate/replicate
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 4
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
D2 = concentration of second duplicate/replicate
An RPD result greater than the control limit indicates a lack of agreement between the
results. The data associated with these results are questionable and are flagged estimated
or unusable.
SERIAL DILUTIONS
For an inorganic inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis, a serial dilution analysis is
made for each set of samples of similar matrix type and concentration. For an analyte
concentration at least a factor of 10 above CRDL, the measured concentrations of the
undiluted sample, and of the sample after a five-fold dilution, should agree within
10 percent. If the difference is greater than 10 percent, the results for that compound are
considered estimated because of matrix interference.
INSTRUMENT QC
Other instrument-specific tests include initial and continuing calibration,
decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP) and bromofluorobenzene (BFB) tuning for the
GC/MS, and determining the linearity of standard calibration curves in GFAA analysis by
determining the coefficient of correlation (r).
Initial and continuing calibration of instruments with standard solutions are used to ensure
that the instrument is capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. Calibration
verification results must fall within control limits, or the results are flagged estimated or
unusable.
Standard compounds, such as DFTPP and BFB, are used to tune and evaluate the
performance of the GC/MS. If mass calibration is in error or ion abundance criteria for
these compounds is not met, then the associated data are considered unusable.
The method of standard addition may be required of inorganic analysis. It involves a
three-point calibration curve prepared by spiking the sample matrix. If the correlation
coefficient of a standard calibration curve for the method of standard addition is less than
0.995, the data are considered estimated.
DATA REVIEW AND VALIDATION
CRL DATA REVIEW
The Sample Management Office receives data packages from the laboratories in the CLP
and distributes them to the Laboratory Sciences Services Section (LSSS) of the U.S. EPA
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 5
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
Region 5 CRL. The LSSS reviews all data packages resulting from regional sampling
efforts. The following items are reviewed (as stated in U.S. EPA guidelines):
Sample holding times at the CLP laboratory
GC/MS tuning and performance (organics)
Instrument calibration
Blanks
Interference check sample analysis (inorganics)
Surrogate recoveries (organics)
Matrix and analytical spike analysis
Duplicate sample analysis
Compound identification (organics)
Overall assessment of data
DATA VALIDATION
After CH2M HILL receives the CRL-reviewed data packages, the reviewer's comments are
summarized in the final data validation before data interpretation by project staff. Any
data noted in the review that should be qualified are flagged with the appropriate symbol
(Table 10-3). Results for field blanks and field replicates are reviewed (these may or may
not have been considered by the LSSS) and the data further qualified if necessary.
Finally, the data set as a whole is examined for consistency, anomalous results, and
whether the data are reasonable for the samples involved. Table 10-3 lists the data
qualifiers used in this project and gives explanations of their use. Data flagged with a
qualifier may be used to a limited degree or may be completely unusable, depending on
the type of problem and significance of the data point.
Data review packages are identified by sample case numbers and traffic report numbers
for routine analytical services (RAS) and by SAS numbers for special analytical services
(e.g., fast turnaround times or high-hazard samples). For RAS samples, a case number is
assigned to a group of samples collected at one time, and individual samples are assigned
unique traffic report numbers to identify them from the time of sampling through
reporting of the analytical data. For SAS samples, the first four numbers define a group
of samples and the final letters and numbers identify individual samples (e.g., SAS
3136-EO1, SAS 3136-E02). CH2M HILL again assigns each sample a unique identification
related to sampling location, time of sampling, or depth of sample (e.g., GH-GH30A-02
for G&H Landfill Round 2 sample collected from shallow monitoring well, GH30A).
-------
Table 10-3
DATA QUALIFIERS
Symbol
(Data Flag) Definition and Explanation
B Blank Contamination
Chemical constituent also found in
laboratory or field blank. Data are not
flagged if sample concentration exceeds
blank concentration by at least a factor of
10 for common laboratory contaminants
(methylene chloride, acetone, toluene, 2-
butanone, and phthalate esters), or a factor
of 5 for other contaminants. Data not
meeting this criterion are flagged and are
considered unusable. Data are not corrected
by subtracting the blank value.
J Estimated Value
Concentration was above the analytical
detection limit but less than CRQL or CRDL,
or one or more associated QA/QC parameters
were beyond control limits.
R Unusable Data
D Diluted Value
Note: All data qualified as estimated are usable at user's
discretion.
GLT863/037.50
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 6
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
ROUND 1—FIELD SAMPLING
GROUNDWATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES
Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and two
field blanks were analyzed by Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory (ENSECO)
for inorganic analytes (Case 10968, SDG No, MET253, QC No. 88168. ITR
Nos. MET252-254, MET256-271 and MET274) by low concentration procedures. The data
results are presented in Table 1. The data are qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery for vanadium (0 percent) is below control limits.
The data may be biased low and the quantitation limits may be higher than
reported for this compound. All detected results for these samples are
considered estimated (flagged "J") and all undetected results are considered
unusable (flagged "R").
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis was out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
lead (MET252, MET253. MET256, MET257, MET261, MET264, MET266,
MET268, and MET271); selenium (MET252, MET253, MET256, MET257,
MET260-271, and MET274); and thallium (MET252-254, MET256-258,
MET261-271, and MET274).
• Aluminum (28.7 to 53.2 jig/1), barium (3.2 to 9.8 pg/1), calcium (391 to
838 yg/1), copper (3.9 pg/1), iron (19.7 to 41.7 jig/1), magnesium (48.7 to
146 vgfl), potassium (222 ng/1), sodium (1,080 to 1,840 jig/1) and zinc (4.8 to
267 yg/1) were found in the field blanks from this sampling round. Samples
associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations
less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged
"B").
Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and one
field blank were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case 10968, SDG
No. MET272, QC No. 88170, ITR Nos. MEBG01-06, MET272, MET273, MET275-278,
MET281, MET282, MET284, MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, and MEW490) by
low concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 1. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery for thallium (53 percent) is below control limits.
The data may be biased low and the quantitation limits may be higher than
reported for this compound. Positive results for these samples are considered
estimated (flagged "J"). Spike sample recovery for mercury (200 percent)
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 7
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
indicates a high bias, although all results for this compound were below
instrument detection limits and the data are considered acceptable.
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
arsenic (MET277); lead (MEBG01-03, MEBG05, MET272, MET281, MET289);
selenium (MEBG01-05, MET272, MET273, MET276-278, MET281, MET282,
MET284, MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, and MEW490); and thallium
(MEBG01-06, MET272, MET273, MET275, MET277, MET278, MET281,
' MET282, MET284, MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, AND MEW490).
• The serial dilution results (12 percent) indicate interference and the results for
zinc for all samples are considered estimated (J).
• The field blanks listed with SDG No. MET253 also apply to this group.
• Because of poor replicate results for samples MET284 and MET289 for zinc,
the results for this compound in these samples are considered estimated (J).
Nineteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and two
field blanks were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case 10968, SDG
No. MEBGOO, QC No. 88176, ITR Nos. MEBGOO, MEBG07-10, MET279, MET280,
MET283, MET288, and MEW491-500) by low concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table 1. The data are qualified as follows:
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
arsenic (MEBGOO, MEBG07, MEBG08, MEBG09, MEW493, and MEW496);
lead (MEBG10); selenium (MEBGOO, MEBG07-08, MEBG10, MET279,
MET280, MET283, MET288, and MEW491-500); and thallium (MEBGOO,
MEBG08, MEBG09, MET279, MET280, MET283, MET288, and
MEW491-500).
• The serial dilution results (17 percent) indicate interference and the results for
zinc for all samples are considered estimated (J).
• The results for sodium in sample MET280 exceeded the linear range of the
instrument and the results are considered estimated (J).
• The method of standard addition correlation coefficient for arsenic on sample
MEW491 was less than 0.995 and the results are considered estimated (J).
• The field blanks listed with SDG No. MET253 also apply to this group.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 8
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
GROUNDWATER—ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Residential Wells
Fifteen residential well groundwater samples including two replicate sets and two field
blanks were analyzed by CompuChem Laboratories (COMPU) for volatile and semi-
volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968/SAS
423 IE, OTR Nos. EALOO-03, EAL06-07, EAL10, EAL11, EAL13, EAL14, EAL19, and
EAL22-25) by low concentration procedures. Two trip blanks were also analyzed for
volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group (EAL04 and EAL08). The data
results are presented in Table 2. The data are qualified as follows:
• Holding times were exceeded for the reanalysis of SVOC fractions for
EAL03RE, EAL06RE and EAL22RE and all detected results are considered
estimated (J).
• Surrogate spike recoveries were below control limits for more than SVOC
surrogate for EAL03 (39, 0, and 0 percent), EAL06 (0 and 0 percent), and
EAL22 (0 and 0 percent). These samples were reanalyzed but surrogate spike
recoveries were still below control limits for more than one SVOC surrogate
for EAL03RE (4 and 9 percent), EAL06 (0 and 0 percent), and EAL22RE
(0 and 0 percent). The data may be biased low and the quantitation limits
may be higher than reported. All detected SVOC results for these samples are
considered estimated (flagged "J") and all undetected SVOC results are
considered unusable (flagged "R").
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone, 2-hexanone, and
acrolein for all samples are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and
unusable (R) for undetected results for these compounds. Calibration outliers
also caused the positive results for acetone and 1,1,1-trichloroethane for all
samples to be considered estimated (J).
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (5 yg/1) and
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (3 vg/1), were found in the method blanks.
Methylene chloride (0.8 to 1 vg/1), acetone (4 to 14 yg/1), and toluene (0.6 jig/1),
both common laboratory contaminants, were found in the field or trip blanks.
Phenol (2 jig/1) was found in the field blank. Samples associated with these
blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
phenol, or 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank concentrations
are considered unusable (flagged "B").
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 9
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
MONITORING WELLS
Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by Environmental Science and Engineering (EMSI) for volatile and
semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968,
SDG No. EAL27, OTR Nos. EAL26-45) by low concentration procedures. The data
results are presented in Table 3. The data are qualified as follows:
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples) and
3-nitroaniline (EAL27-31, EAL33, and EAL34) are considered estimated (J) for
all detected results and unusable (R) for undetected results for these
compounds. Calibration outliers also caused the positive results for acetone
(EAL32, EAL36, EAL38, EAL39, EAL43, EAL44 and EAL45) to be
considered estimated (J).
• A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (2 to 6 jjg/1), was found
in the method blanks. N-nitrosodiphenylamine (2 iig/1) was found in the
method blank. The common laboratory contaminants, acetone (2 jig/1),
methylene chloride (2 to 6 jig/1), and toluene (1 to 3 yg/1) were found in the
field and/or trip blanks. Tetrachloroethene (2 yg/1) and
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (53 yg/1) were also found in the field blank. Samples
associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations
less than 5 times the N-nitrosodiphenylamine, or 10 times the common
laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged
"B").
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAL29 were outside the control limits for
4-nitrophenol. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits
in the same sample for 1,4-dichlorobenzene. The unspiked sample was
considered estimated by the CRL reviewer for these compounds although
neither was detected in the unspiked sample.
Seventeen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and two
field blanks were analyzed by EMSI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968, SDG No. EAL46, OTR
Nos. EAL46, EAL47, EA49-52, EAL55, EAL57-60, EBGOO, EBG02-05, and EBG07) by
low concentration procedures. Two trip blanks were also analyzed for volatile organic
compounds as part of this sample group (EAL48 and EBG01). The data results are
presented in Table 3. The data are qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of sample EBG04 was diluted and reanalyzed as EBG04DL.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 10
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples),
3-nitroaniline (EAL47), and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (EAL46, EAL47, EAL49-52,
EAL55, EAL57, EAL58, EAL59, EAL60, EBGOO, EBG02-05, and EBG07) are
considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for
undetected results for these compounds. Calibration outliers also caused the
positive results for 2,4-dimethylphenol (EBG04) and acetone (EAL49-51,
EAL55, EAL57-60, EBGOO, EBG03-05, and EBG04DL) to be considered
estimated (J).
• A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (2 to 3 pg/1), was found
in the method blanks. Benzoic acid (10 jig/1) was also found in the method
blank. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 5 times the benzoic acid, or 10 times the common
laboratory contaminant concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAL58 were outside the control limits for
4-nitrophenol. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits
for the same sample for pentachlorophenol. The unspiked sample was
considered estimated by the CRL reviewer for both compounds although
neither were detected in the unspiked sample.
• GC/MS tuning, the retention time marker specifically, is out of control limits
for the pesticide marker for EAL46. All pesticide results for this sample are
considered estimated (J).
• Ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EBG04 exceeded the linear range of the
instrument. Use the results for diluted sample EBG04 for these compounds.
• Field blanks from SDG No. EAL27 also apply to this sample group.
Sixteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells were analyzed by EMSI for volatile
and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 10968, SDG No. EAL56, OTR Nos. EAL56, EBG06, and EBG08-20, EBG22) by
low concentration procedures. One trip blank was also analyzed for volatile organic
compounds as part of this sample group (EBG21). The data results are presented in
Table 3. The data are qualified as follows:
The VOC fraction of sample EBG22 was diluted and reanalyzed as EBG22DL.
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples) and
4-chloroaniline (EBG06) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results,
and unusable (R) for undetected results for these compounds. Calibration
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 11
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
outliers also caused the positive results for 2,4-dimethylphenol (all samples
except EBG06) and acetone (all samples) to be considered estimated (J).
• Benzoic acid (10 yg/1) was found in the method blank. Samples associated with
this blank that contain this contaminant at concentrations less than 5 times the
benzoic acid concentration are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Field blanks from SDG No. EAL27 also apply to this sample group.
• Because of poor replicate results for EAL56 and EBG05 for carbon disulfide,
the results for this compound are considered estimated (J) and should be used
with caution.
Six groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two field blanks were analyzed by
Wan Technologies, Inc. (WANTEC) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968, SDG No. EAL53, OTR
Nos. EAL53, EAL54, and EBG23-26) by low concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table 3. The data are qualified as follows:
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone and 4-chloroaniline
for all samples are considered estimated (J) for all detected results, and
unusable (R) for nondetected results for these compounds. Calibration outliers
also caused the positive results to be considered estimated (J) for
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (all samples), 4,4'-DDT and methoxychlor (EBG25)
and heptachlor, dieldrin, 4,4'-DDT, methoxychlor, aldrin, endrin, endosulfan
sulfate, alpha-chlordane and gamma-chlordane (EAL53, EAL54, EBG23,
EBG24, and EBG26).
• Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (2 vg/1) and
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (7 yg/1) were found in the method blanks.
Tetrachloroethene (1 jig/1) was also found in the method blank. Samples
associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations
less than 5 times the tetrachloroethene, or 10 times the common laboratory
contaminant blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Field blanks from SDG No. EAL27 also apply to this sample group.
SURFACE SOIL—ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Fifteen soil samples were analyzed by WANTEC for pesticides/PCBs including two sets of
replicates (Case 10968, SDG No. EAL53, OTR Nos. EBG27-41) by low concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 4. The data are qualified as follows:
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 12
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
• Because of calibration outliers, the positive results are considered estimated (J)
for 4,4'-DDT and methoxychlor (EBG30 and EBG35-40) and heptachlor,
dieldrin, 4,4'-DDT, methoxychlor, aldrin, endrin, endosulfan sulfate, alpha-
chlordane and gamma-chlordane (EBG27, EBG29, and EBG41).
Fourteen soil samples including one replicate set were analyzed by DataChem (DATAC)
for pesticides/PCBs including one replicate set (Case 11050, SDG No. EBG42, OTR
Nos. EBG42-55) by low concentration procedures. The data results are presented in
Table 4. The data are qualified as follows:
• Holding times were for extraction of all samples and all detected results are
considered estimated (J).
• Surrogate spike recoveries were high for the pesticide surrogate for EBG42
(999 percent). All detected pesticide/PCB results for this sample are
considered estimated (flagged "J").
Twelve soil samples were analyzed by American Analytical and Technical Services (AATS)
for dioxins/furans including one replicate set (Case SAS 4308 E, Sample Nos. E12-23).
The data results are presented in Table 4. The data are qualified as follows:
• Because of calibration outliers, the positive results are considered estimated (J)
for 2,3,7,8-TCDD, PENTA-CDD, HEXA-CDD, and HEPTA-CDD (all
samples); HEXA-CDD, TETRA-CDD, TETRA-CDF, PENTA-CDF and
HEXA-CDF,and 2,3,7,8-TCDD (E12-17); and PENTA-CDD, HEXA-CDD,
TETRA-CDD, HEXA-CDF, and 2,3,7,8-TCDD (E18-23).
SURFACE SOIL—PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
Eleven soil samples were analyzed for grain size and six of these samples were also
analyzed for Atterberg limits (Case SAS 4308, Sample Nos. E01-E11) by Chen and
Associates (CHEN). The data are qualified as follows:
• No method duplicates were run as specified in the SAS request forms and all
data are considered estimated (J).
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 13
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
ROUND 2—FIELD SAMPLING
GROUNDWATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES
Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including three replicate sets, one
sample of a replicate set, and two field blanks were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic
analytes (Case 12417, ITR Nos. MEAA63-70 and MEAA73-84) by low concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
lead (MEAA64-68, MEAA73, MEAA75, MEAA77, and MEAA79-84); arsenic
(MEAA83); selenium (MEAA64-68, and MEAA73-84); and thallium
(MEAA63-68, MEAA73-81, and MEAA83-84).
• Field duplicates for samples MEAA74-75 were out of control limits for
aluminum (83 RPD), copper (134 RPD), lead (170 RPD), and manganese (85
RPD) and the results for these analytes are considered estimated (J) in these
samples.
• Beryllium (0.7 to 1.0 pg/1), iron (30.6 pg/1), and zinc (11 jig/1) were found in the
calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that
contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one sample of a replicate set
and two field blanks were analyzed by ENSECO for metals (Case 12417, ITR
Nos. MEAA85-87, and MEAC75-91) by low concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
lead (MEAA85, MEAA87, MEAC75-78, MEAC82, MEAC84, MEAC86, and
MEAC90); selenium (MEAA85-87, MEAC75-82, MEAC84-86, and
MEAC88-91); and thallium (MEAA85-87, MEAC75-82, MEAC84-86, and
MEAC88-91).
• Beryllium (0.5 jig/1) and magnesium (140 to 330 pg/1) were found in the
calibration blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 14
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Nine groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by Skinner and Sherman, Inc. (SKINER) for inorganic analytes
(Case 12417, ITR Nos. MEAC52-60) by low concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery for thallium (72 percent) is below control limits.
The data may be biased low and the quantitation limits may be higher than
reported for this compound. All results for these samples are considered
estimated (flagged "J").
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
selenium (MEAC53-59) and thallium (MEAC52-59).
• Aluminum (41.6 yg/1), antimony (20.9 to 30.3 jig/1), beryllium (0.6 to 1.1 yg/1),
cadmium (3.5 jig/1), cobalt (4.5 to 7.6 vg/1), iron (25.6 iig/1), manganese (3.3 to
4.1 jig/1), sodium (88.6 to 129.8 yg/1), and zinc (5.4 to 14.3 pg/1) were found in
the calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with these blanks
that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and one
field blank were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case 12417, ITR Nos.
MEAA42-43 and MEAA45-62) by low concentration procedures. The data results are
presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• Duplicate injection precision exceeded control limits for MEAA55 for selenium
and the result for selenium in this sample is considered estimated (J).
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
selenium (MEAA42-43, MEAA46-47, MEAA49, MEAA51-53, MEAA58-59 and
MEAA61); arsenic (MEAA45, MEAA50, MEAA54, MEAA57, MEAA60, and
MEAA62); thallium (MEAA42-49, MEAA51, and MEAA53-62); and lead
(MEAA47-49, MEAA51, MEAA53, MEAA56-58, and MEAA60-62).
• Beryllium (0.8 jig/1), copper (19.2 jig/1), iron (25.8 >ig/l), and zinc (4.7 yg/1) were
found in the calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with these
blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 15
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Field duplicates for samples MEAA58 and MEAA59 were out of control limits
for zinc (82 RPD) and the results for this analyte are considered estimated (J)
in these samples.
Eighteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and two
field blanks were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case 12417, ITR
Nos. MEAC61-62, MEAC65-72, and MEAC92-99) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
lead (MEAC99); selenium (MEAC61, MEAC62, MEAC65-68, MEAC70-71,
MEAC92-94, and MEAC96-99); and thallium (MEAC61-62, MEAC65-68,
MEAC70-71, MEAC92-97, and MEAC99).
• Beryllium (0.5 vg/1), magnesium (140 to 330 pg/1), and zinc (1.6 jig/1) were
found in the calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with these
blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• The serial dilution results for zinc (20.1 percent), barium (10.5 percent), iron
(10.2 percent), and manganese (11.7 percent) indicate interference and the
results for these analytes are considered estimated (J).
Barium (3 to 8.9 yg/1), beryllium (0.5 yg/1), calcium (156 to 3,160 jig/1), copper
(6.7 to 15.8 ng/1), iron (22.5 to 67.2 iig/1), magnesium (76.4 to 859 jig/1),
manganese (3 jig/1), nickel (5.8 pg/1), sodium (526 to 1,920 t»g/l), potassium
(238 jig/1), and zinc (1.8 to 9.2 jig/1) were found in the field blanks. Samples
associated with these blanks (all groundwater sample groups listed above) that
contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Seven groundwater samples including two replicate sets were analyzed by JTC
Environmental Consultants (JTC) for inorganic analytes (Case SAS 4208E, ITR
Nos. MEAC44 and MEAC46-51) by high concentration procedures. The data has not yet
been received (as of March, 1990).
GROUNDWATER—ORGANIC ANALYSES
Eighteen monitoring well groundwater samples including three replicate sets and two field
blanks were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs
and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDA63-70 and EDA73-82) by
low concentration procedures. Two trip blanks were also analyzed for volatile organic
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 16
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
compounds as part of this sample group (EDA71 and EDA72). The data results are
presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of sample EDA79 was diluted and reanalyzed as EDA79DL.
• Holding times were exceeded for the pesticide/PCB fraction extractions for
EDA63, EDA65-68, EDA70 and EDA73-74; all pesticide/PCB results for these
samples are considered estimated (J).
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA68 were outside the control limits for
gamma-BHC. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits
for the same sample for gamma-BHC, heptachlor, and dieldrin. The unspiked
sample was considered estimated (J) by the CRL reviewer for these
compounds. Matrix spike recovery for sample EDA63 was slightly outside the
control limits for pyrene. The unspiked sample was not qualified by the CRL
reviewer based on this result.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for chloroethane
(EDA63-67, EDA74-77, and EDA79-82), methylene chloride (EDA79-82),
acetone (EDA78-82), chlorobenzene (EDA79-82) and bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
(EDA79-82) are considered estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers,
the results for 2-butanone (EDA69 and EDA71-72) are considered estimated
(J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for these
compounds.
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (9 jig/1), methylene chloride (1 to
2 vg/1) and di-n-butylphthalate (3 jig/1) were found in the method blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
• Benzene, ethylbenzene, and xylene in EDA79 exceeded the linear range of the
instrument and the results for these compounds in this sample are considered
estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted sample EDA79DL for these
compounds.
Nine monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by EMSI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF52-60) by low concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples) are
considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 17
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
nondetected results for these compounds. Also because of calibration outliers,
the detected results for acetone (all samples), 1,2-dichloroethene (all samples),
2,4-dimethylphenol (all samples), benzoic acid (EDF57), and 4-chloroaniline (all
samples) are considered estimated (J).
• A common laboratory contaminant, acetone (9 jig/1), was found in a method
blank. Samples associated with this blank that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
One monitoring well groundwater sample was analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-
volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR
No. EDA83) by low concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 5.
The data are qualified as follows:
• Surrogate spike recoveries were low for the pesticide surrogate for EDA83
(0 percent). The CRL reviewer determined that the pesticide surrogate was
present but the peak was shifted due to phthalate contamination. All pesticide/
PCB results for this sample are considered estimated (flagged "J").
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA83 were slightly outside the control
limits for trichloroethene and benzene. The unspiked sample was not qualified
by the CRL reviewer based on these results.
Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set, one sample of a
replicate set, and two field blanks were analyzed by Environmental Control Technology
Corporation (ENCOT) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF77-96) by low concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• The SVOC fraction of sample EDF92 was diluted and reanalyzed as
EDF92DL.
• Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction extraction for EDF95 and
all SVOC results are considered estimated (J).
• Benzene in sample EDF89 and 4-methylphenol in EDF86 exceeded the linear
range of the instrument, but the samples were not diluted and reanalyzed. The
results for these compounds in these samples are considered estimated (J).
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples) are
considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 18
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
nondetected results for this compound. Also, because of calibration outliers,
the detected results for all pesticides (EDF92) are considered estimated (J).
• Matrix spike recovery for sample EDF83 was slightly outside the control limits
for endrin. The matrix spike duplicate RPD for sample EDF84 was slightly
outside the control limits for chlorobenzene. The unspiked sample was not
qualified by the CRL reviewer based on this result.
• Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (4 to 13 yg/1), acetone
(10 jig/1), and di-n-butylphthalate (1 to 4 jig/1) were found in the method blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Naphthalene in EDF92 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the
result for this compound in this sample is considered estimated. Use the result
from the diluted sample EDF92DL for this compound.
Sixteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and two
field blanks were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDA84-87, EDF61-62,
EDF65-72, and EDF75-76) by low concentration procedures. Four trip blanks were also
analyzed for volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group (EDF63, EDF64,
EDF73, and EDF74). The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified
as follows:
The SVOC and pesticide/PCBs fraction of sample EDA86 was diluted and
reanalyzed as EDA86DL.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for benzene (EDF61-66)
are considered estimated (J).
• The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits for EDF65 for
1,1-dichloroethene. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) by the
CRL reviewer for this compound.
• Methylene chloride (3 to 4 yg/1) and acetone (10 jig/1) were found in the
method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Naphthalene and 4-methylphenol in EDA86 exceeded the linear range of the
instrument and the results for these compounds in this sample are considered
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 19
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted sample EDA86DL for these
compounds.
• The laboratory qualified the results for Aroclor-1254 in sample EDA86DL with
a "C," but did not explain what this qualify meant. The results from this
analysis should be used with caution pending clarification from the laboratory.
Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs
and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDA43-62) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of sample EDA49 was diluted and reanalyzed as EDA49RE.
• Holding time was exceeded for the pesticide/PCB fraction extraction for
EDA57 and all pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered estimated
(J)-
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for acetone (EDA57-61), methylene
chloride (EDA43-52 and EDA49RE), chloroethane (EDA43-52 and
EDA49RE), and trichloroethene (EDA57-61) are considered estimated (J).
• Matrix spike recovery for sample EDA62 was outside the control limits for
4,4-DDT. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits for
the same sample for 4,4-DDT and gamma-BHC. The unspiked sample was
considered estimated (J) by the CRL reviewer for these compounds.
• Methylene chloride (1 to 5 jig/1) was found in the method blanks. Samples
associated with these blanks that contain this contaminant at concentrations less
than 10 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• GC/MS tuning requirements, specifically the pesticide/PCB retention time
marker shift, are out of control limits for EDA58 and EDA49. All pesticide/
PCB results for these samples are considered estimated (J).
• Vinyl chloride and 1,1-dichloroethene in EDA49 exceeded the linear range of
the instrument and the results for these compounds in this sample are
considered estimated. Use the results from the diluted sample EDA49RE for
these compounds.
Three monitoring well groundwater samples including one sample of a replicate set were
analyzed by ENCOT for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs),
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 20
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF97-99) by low concentration procedures.
The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• 4-Methylphenol in EDF99 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and no
dilution or reanalysis of the sample was done. The results for this compound
in this sample are considered estimated (J).
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EDF97 and EDF99)
are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for
nondetected results for this compound.
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDF85 (from another sample delivery
group) were outside the control limits for benzene, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol,
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, and endrin. The matrix spike
duplicate RPD was outside the control limits for the same sample for
trichloroethene and benzene. The unspiked sample was considered estimated
(J) by the CRL reviewer for these compounds.
• Methylene chloride (4 to 13 jig/1) and acetone (10 pg/1) were found in the
method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (1 to 23 ygyi), toluene
(1 to 36 jig/1), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (6 jig/1) were found in the field or
trip blanks. Xylene (20 jig/1), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (2 to 3 jig/1),
4-methyl-2-pentanone (8 jig/1), and ethylbenzene (2 pg/1) were also found in the
field or trip blanks. Samples associated with these blanks (all groundwater
sample groups listed above) that contain these contaminants at concentrations
less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant, or 5 times the other
compound blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Seven monitoring well groundwater samples including two replicate sets were analyzed by
AATS for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 12495, OTR Nos. EDF44, and EDF46-51) by high concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of sample EDF51 was analyzed as two phases, an aqueous
and a nonaqueous phase. The SVOC and pesticide/PCB fractions of samples
EDF47 and EDF51 were analyzed as two phases, an aqueous and a
nonaqueous phase. The sample phases are designated as EDF47A or
EDF47-11, EDF47B or EDF47-12, EDF51A or EDF51-11, and EDF51B or
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 21
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
EDF51-12. The notations "A" or "-11" refer to the nonaqueous phase, and
the notations "B" or "-12" to the aqueous phase.
• No holding times were specified for high concentration organic analysis.
• All VOC surrogate spikes were diluted out in sample EDF51A and the VOC
results for this sample are considered estimated (J). Surrogate spike recoveries
were high for the pesticide surrogate for EDF50 (130 percent). All detected
pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered estimated (flagged "J").
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for endosulfan II (all samples),
2-butanone (EDF44, EDF46-50, and EDF51B), 3-nitroaniline (EDF51A), and
4-nitroaniline (EDF46, EDF47A, EDF47B, EDF48-50, and EDF51B) are
considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for
nondetected results for these compounds. Also because of calibration outliers,
the detected results for 2-methylnaphthalene (EDF46, EDF47A, EDF47B,
EDF48-50, EDF51A, and EDF51B), and methylene chloride (EDF47, EDF48,
and EDF51A) are considered estimated (J).
• There was poor agreement between values obtained using both columns for the
PCB results for EDF47, EDF48, EDF51A, and EDF51B and the PCB results
are considered estimated (J) in these samples.
• Methylene chloride (2 to 7 jig/1) and chloroform (2 ng/1) were found in the
method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the methylene chloride, or
5 times the chloroform concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
GROUNDWATER—CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Fifty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including six replicate sets and four field
blanks were analyzed by Industrial Corrosion Management (ICM) for oil and grease, BOD,
COD, TOC, total phosphate, TDS, sulfate, alkalinity, ammonia, nitrate plus nitrite, and
chloride (Case SAS 4733E, Sample Nos. E01-E50) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 6. The data are qualified as follows:
• E03 was only analyzed for oil and grease. Samples E19 and E41 were not
analyzed for oil and grease, and E46 was not analyzed for COD or TOC
because the bottles were incorrectly preserved.
• E36 for phosphate, E48 for phosphate and chloride, and E49 for phosphate
and chloride were reanalyzed as E36RE, E48RE, and E49RE because of poor
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 22
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
precision between replicates, but the holding times for sample analysis was
exceeded and the values reported from reanalysis were not used.
• The laboratory deviated from the SAS specified method for chloride by
exceeding the detection limits by a factor of 10 and changing the working range
from 1 to 20 mg/1 to 5 to 200 mg/1. Quantitation limits may be higher than
reported for this analyte for E10, E27, E28, and E43 and chloride results for
these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").
• The CRL reviewer stated that holding times were exceeded for E41 for TOC
and E30 and E31 for chloride, and the results considered estimated (J),
although no analysis date was given on the laboratory sheets.
Field duplicates for samples E35-36 (73 RPD), and E48-49 (55 RPD) for
phosphate, E30-E31 (15 RPD) and E48-49 (11.3 RPD) for chloride and E46-47
(44 RPD) for ammonia exceeded the specified SAS control limits of less than
10 RPD. All chloride, phosphate and ammonia results are considered
estimated (J) because of poor precision.
SURFACE WATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES
Nine surface water samples including two replicate sets and one field blank were analyzed
by JTC for inorganic analytes (Case SAS 4208E, ITR Nos. MEAC21-28 and MEAC38) by
high concentration procedures. The data has not yet been received (as of March, 1990).
SURFACE WATER—ORGANIC ANALYSES
Nine surface water samples including two replicate sets and one field blank were analyzed
by AATS for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 12495, OTR Nos. EDF21-28 and EDF38) by high concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 7. The data are qualified as follows:
• No holding times were specified for high concentration organic analysis.
• Surrogate recoveries for the pesticide surrogate for EDF21 (125 percent),
EDF25 (135 percent), and EDF38 (135 percent). All detected pesticide/PCB
results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDF21 were outside the control limits for
n-nitroso dipropylamine. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J)
for this compound.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 23
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for endosulfan II (all samples),
2-butanone (all samples), and 4-nitroaniline (EDF22, EDF24, EDF27-28 and
EDF38) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R)
for nondetected results for these compounds. Also because of calibration
outliers, the detected results for methylene chloride (EDF21, EDF23, EDF25,
EDF28, and EDF38) and 2-methylnaphthalene (EDF21-25, EDF27-28 and
EDF38) are considered estimated (J).
• There was poor agreement between pesticide values obtained using both
columns and the pesticide results for EDF21, EDF23, EDF25, and EDF38 are
considered estimated.
• Methylene chloride (2 to 7 mg/kg) and chloroform (2 mg/kg) were found in the
method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the methylene chloride, or
5 times the chloroform concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Methylene chloride (4 mg/kg) and chloroform (2.5 mg/kg) were found in the
field blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the methylene chloride or
5 times the chloroform concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
LEACHATE—INORGANIC ANALYSIS
Eight leachate samples from leachate wells including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by York Laboratories (YORK) for inorganic analytes (Case 12479, ITR
Nos. MEAC29-35, and MEAC37) by low concentration procedures. The data results are
presented in Table 8. The data are qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery for mercury (129 percent) is above control limits.
The data may be biased high and all results for mercury in these samples are
considered estimated (flagged "J").
• Method duplicates were outside the control limits for mercury and the results
for this analyte are considered estimated (J) because of poor precision.
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results for: selenium (MEAC31-32,
MEAC35, and MEAC37); and thallium (MEAC29, MEAC31-32, MEAC34-35,
and MEAC37) are considered estimated (J).
• Aluminum (117.2 jig/1), arsenic (0.8 to 1.2 yg/1), beryllium (0.3 jig/1), calcium
(83.6 pg/1), lead (0.4 to 0.9 yg/1), sodium (523.1 yg/1), selenium (0.5 to 0.8 jig/1),
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 24
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
thallium (0.4 to 0.5 jig/1), vanadium (3.1 to 4.5 pg/1) and zinc (10.9 jig/1) were
found in the calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with these
blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Aluminum (126 vg/1), calcium (272 pg/1), lead (2.7 yg/1), magnesium (37.5 jig/1),
nickel (5.2 jig/1), sodium (825 yg/1), thallium (12.1 yg/1), and zinc (12.1 yg/1)
were found in the field blank. Samples associated with this blank that contain
these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations
are considered unusable (flagged "B").
LEACHATE—ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Eight leachate samples from leachate wells including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by Three Rivers Analytical (3RIVER) for volatile and semi-volatile organic
compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12479, OTR Nos. EDF29-35
and EDF37) by low concentration procedures. One trip blank was also analyzed for
volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group (EDF45). The data results are
presented in Table 8. The data are qualified as follows:
The VOC fraction of sample EDF30 was reanalyzed as EBF30RE because of
poor surrogate recoveries.
• Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for a VOC surrogate for EDF30
(123 percent) and EDF30RE (124 percent). The data are biased high and all
VOC results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J"). Since
surrogate recoveries were not improved with sample reanalysis, use the results
from the original analysis, EDF30.
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDF34 were outside the control limits for
benzene, n-nitroso dipropylamine, and 4-nitrophenol. The unspiked sample was
considered estimated (J) by the CRL reviewer for these compounds.
• The internal standard area counts were out of the control limits for two VOC
internal standards for sample EDF34. Compounds associated with these
standards in this sample are considered estimated (flagged "J").
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EDF34-35, EDF37,
and EDF45) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable
(R) for nondetected results for these compounds.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 25
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Methylene chloride (5 to 11 yg/1) was found in the method blanks. Samples
associated with this blank that contain this contaminant at concentrations less
than 10 times the blank concentration are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Acetone (10 jig/1) and methylene chloride (4 pg/l) were found in the field or
trip blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Field duplicates for samples EDF29 and EDF32 were out of control limits for
toluene (25 RPD) and the results for this compound are considered estimated
(J) in these samples.
SUBSURFACE SOILS—INORGANIC ANALYSIS
Test Pits
Twenty soil samples from test pits including two replicate sets and one field blank were
analyzed by Keystone Environmental Resources (KEYTX) for inorganic analytes including
cyanide (Case 12070, ITR Nos. MEAA10, MEAA12-15, MEAA24-35, and MEAA37-39) by
low concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 9. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery for antimony (70.9 percent), manganese
(46.6 percent), and lead (67.3 percent) are below control limits. The data may
be biased low and the quantitation limits may be higher than reported for these
compounds. All detected results for these samples are considered estimated
(flagged "J").
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results for selenium (MEAA10, MEAA15,
MEAA25-28, MEAA30-32, MEAA37, and MEAA39) and thallium (MEAA15,
MEAA25-26, MEAA32-33, MEAA14, and MEAA37) are considered estimated
(J)-
• Manganese (0.660 mg/kg) was found in the preparation blank. Samples
associated with this blank that contain this contaminant at concentrations less
than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• The method of standard addition correlation coefficient for arsenic on samples
MEAA12, MEAA27, and MEAA29 and for lead on samples MEAA15,
MEAA30-31, and MEAA33 were less than 0.995 and the results are considered
estimated (J).
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 26
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
• Duplicate injection precision exceeded control limits for selenium in samples
MEAA10, MEAA25-26, and MEAA37 and the results are considered estimated
(J).
Twenty soil samples from test pits including one replicate set and one field blank were
analyzed by Laucks Testing Labs, Inc. (LAUCKS) for inorganic analytes including cyanide
(Case 11960, ITR Nos. MEAAOO-09, MEAA11, MEAA16-23, and MEAA36) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 9. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery for antimony (-84 percent), barium (-6.3 percent),
copper (22.7 percent) is below control limits. The data may be biased low and
the quantitation limits may be higher than reported for this compound. All
detected results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J") and
all undetected results are considered unusable (flagged "R"). The spike sample
recovery for lead (1,220.6 percent) and selenium (35.5 percent) is out of control
limits. All results for these samples are considered estimated (J) for these
analytes.
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results for antimony (MEAA08 and
MEAA22-23); selenium (MEAA06, MEAA16, and MEAA22); and thallium
(MEAA02 and MEAA04-06) are considered estimated (J).
• Aluminum (8.8 mg/kg) and silver (1.7 mg/kg) were found in the preparation
blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
• The serial dilution results for barium (10.6 percent), manganese (10.1 percent),
aluminum (10.4 percent), iron (11.3 percent), and zinc (12.4 percent) indicate
interference and the results for these elements are considered estimated (J).
• Method duplicates were out of control limits for barium (115.5 RPD), copper
(79.3 RPD), lead (47 RPD), iron (32.5 RPD), manganese (80.9 RPD), and zinc
(82.4 RPD) and the results for these analytes are considered estimated (J).
Two soil samples from test pits were analyzed by JTC for inorganic analytes (Case
SAS 42081, ITR No. MEAA40-41) by high concentration procedures. Sample MEAA40
was separated into a solid and a liquid fraction which are designated MEAA40S and
MEAA40L, respectively. The data results are presented in Table 9. The data are
qualified as follows:
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 27
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
There are no established holding times for high concentration samples.
The data are reported on a weight wet basis for high concentration analysis.
The method spike sample recovery for the solid phase for antimony
(48 percent), calcium (60 percent), cobalt (40 percent), and copper
(67 percent); and for the liquid phase for cobalt (21 percent), and copper
(62 percent) is below control limits. The data may be biased low and the
quantitation limits may be higher than reported for these analytes. All results
for these samples for these analytes are considered estimated (flagged "J").
Method spike sample recoveries for the solid phase for silver (0 percent) and
zinc (2 percent), and for the liquid phase for silver (0 percent) are out of
control limits. The data may be biased low and the quantitation limits may be
higher than reported for this analyte. All detected results for these samples
are considered estimated (J) and all undetected results are considered unusable
(flagged "R"). The method spike sample recovery for the solid phase for
aluminum (225 percent), sodium (724 percent), and magnesium (132 percent)
and for the liquid phase for sodium (792 percent) exceeded control limits. The
data may be biased high and the detected results for these samples for
aluminum and magnesium are considered estimated (J). The method spike
concentration added for sodium for both the solid and liquid phases is below
the instrument detection limit, therefore no statement can be made regarding
the accuracy of spike recovery for sodium.
The analysis spike sample recovery for the solid phase for aluminum
(72 percent), beryllium (60 percent), chromium (72 percent), copper
(60 percent), silver (40 percent), calcium (76 percent), magnesium (84 percent),
and zinc (78 percent) and for the liquid phase for nickel (65 percent), zinc
(70 percent), and lead (80 percent) are below control limits. The data may be
biased low and the quantitation limits may be higher than reported for these
analytes. All results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").
The laboratory control sample for aluminum and antimony was outside the
control limits for both the liquid and the solid phase samples. The results for
these analytes in these samples are considered estimated (J).
Cadmium (1.6 mg/kg), calcium (624 mg/kg), and silver (5.2 mg/kg) were found
in the liquid phase preparation blanks. Samples associated with these blanks
that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 28
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Method duplicates were out of control limits for calcium (55 RPD) and sodium
(200 RPD) for the solid phase samples and the results for these analytes are
considered estimated (J).
• Standards for sodium and silver in both the liquid and solid phases exceeded
control limits and the results for these analytes are considered estimated (J).
SUBSURFACE SOILS—ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Soil Borings
Five soil samples from soil borings including one field blank were analyzed by COMPU for
volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12010, OTR Nos. EAG68-72) by low and medium concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 10. The data are qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of samples EAG68 and EAG69 were diluted and reanalyzed
as EAG68RE and EAG69DL. The VOC fraction of EAG72 was reanalyzed as
a medium level sample EAG72RE.
• Holding times were exceeded for the VOC fraction analysis for EAG72RE.
Aromatic compounds in these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").
• Benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzo[k]fluoranthene were coeluting in sample
EAG71 and could not be positively identified, therefore the results for these
two compounds are identified as one group and are considered estimated (J).
• All surrogate compounds were diluted out for the VOC fraction for EAG69,
EAG69DL, and EAG71 and the detected results are considered estimated (J)
and the nondetected results are considered unusable (R). Surrogate recoveries
were below control limits for the pesticide/PCB surrogate for EAG72
(0 percent). The data are biased low, the quantitation limits may be elevated,
and all pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered estimated (J) for
detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results.
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAG69DL were outside the control limits
for toluene, 1,1-dichloroethene, benzene, and trichloroethene and for sample
EAG68 outside the control limits for phenol. Matrix spike duplicates were
outside the control limits for EAG68RE for toluene and for EAG69DL for
trichloroethene, benzene, and toluene. The unspiked samples were considered
estimated (J) for these compounds by the CRL reviewer.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 29
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
• Ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG68; xylene in EAG69; and
2-butanone, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG72 exceeded the linear
range of the instrument and the results for these compounds in these samples
are considered estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted samples,
EAG68RE and EAG69DL, for these compounds, and all the results of
EAG72RE which was rerun as a medium concentration sample. Xylene in
EAG68RE and EAG72RE exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the
results for this compound are considered estimated (J).
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for 2-butanone (EAG68-69,
EAG68RE, EAG69DL, and EAG71), acetone (EAG68, EAG68RE, EAG70,
and EAG72), 4-methyl-2-pentanone (EAG68 and EAG72) methylene chloride
(EAG68RE and EAG70), 4-nitrophenol (EAG68-72), di-n-butylphthalate
(EAG68-72), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (EAG68-72) are considered
estimated (J).
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (13 to 2,000 pg/kg) and methylene
chloride (7 to 2,500 pg/kg), were found in the method blanks. Chloroform
(1 to 140 jig/kg) and xylene (130 vg/kg) were also found in the method blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant, or
5 times the other blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Eight soil samples from soil borings including one field blank were analyzed by ENCOT
for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12090, OTR Nos. EAG63-65, EDA16-17, and EDA19-21) by low and medium
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 10. The data are
qualified as follows:
The VOC fraction of sample EDA17, and the SVOC and pesticide/PCB
fractions of sample EDA19 were diluted and reanalyzed as EDA17DL and
EAG19DL.
• Toluene in EDA17 and several SVOC tentatively identified compounds in
EDA19 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results for these
compounds in these samples and are considered estimated (J). Use the results
from the diluted samples, EDA17DL and EDA19DL, for these compounds.
• Matrix spike recoveries for samples EAG64 and EAG63 were outside the
control limits for 4,4-DDT. Matrix spike duplicates were outside the control
limits for EAG64 for 4,4-DDT. The unspiked samples were considered
estimated (J) for these compounds by the CRL reviewer.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 30
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for acetone (EAG63,
EDA16, EDA19DL, and EAG64), methylene chloride (EAG63), and
2-butanone (EAG64, EDA16-17, EDA19-21, and EDA19DL), are considered
estimated (J).
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (3 to 1,600 jig/kg), methylene
chloride (2 to 15500 ug/kg). di-n-butylphthalate (140 to 330 jig/kg), butyl benzyl
phthalate (69 to 93 yg/kg), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (530 to 720 wg/kg)
were found in the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that
contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common
laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged
"B").
Three soil samples from soil borings including one replicate set were analyzed by Acurex
Corporation (ACUREX) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12203, OTR Nos. EDA92-93 and EDA98) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 10. The data are
qualified as follows:
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA92 were outside the control limits for
toluene, and 1,1-dichloroethene. The unspiked samples were considered
estimated (J) for these compounds by the CRL reviewer.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for 4,4-DDT, methylene
chloride, and acetone (all samples) are considered estimated (J). Also because
of calibration outliers, the detected results for 2-butanone (all samples) are
considered estimated (J) and the nondetected results are considered unusable
(R).
• The common laboratory contaminant, acetone (36 ug/kg), was found in the
method blank. Samples associated with this blank that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory
contaminant blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Aroclor 1254 in sample EDA98 was labeled by the laboratory with an "X," but
the meaning of this qualifier is unknown. The results should be used with
caution pending clarification from the laboratory, and is flagged "J" and
considered estimated.
Nineteen soil samples from soil borings including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by IT Corporation (IT) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12160, OTR Nos. EAG66-67, EAG73,
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 31
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
EDA24-36, EDA96-97, and EDA99) by low and medium concentration procedures.
data results are presented in Table 10. The data are qualified as follows:
The
• Holding times were exceeded for the VOC fraction analysis for EAG73 and
EDA32. Aromatic compounds in these samples are considered estimated
(flagged "J").
• Xylene exceed the linear range of the instrument in samples EDA34 and
EDA36, but the samples were not diluted and reanalyzed. The results for
xylene in these samples should be considered estimated (J).
• Two surrogate compounds were diluted out for the SVOC fraction for EDA33
and one SVOC surrogate compound exceeded the control limits in the same
sample. The SVOC results for sample EDA33 are considered estimated (J).
Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for the pesticide/PCB surrogate
for EDA33 (232 percent) and EDA34 (181 percent). The data are biased high
and all pesticide/PCB results for these samples are considered estimated (J).
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA31 were outside the control limits for
toluene and for sample EDA33 outside the limits for endrin. Matrix spike
duplicates were outside the control limits for EDA32 for toluene and
1,1-dichloroethene, and for EDA25 for 1,4-dichlorobenzene,
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol and acenaphthalene. The
unspiked samples were considered estimated (J) for these compounds by the
CRL reviewer.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for acetone (EDA28,
EDA30-31, EDA34-35 and EAG67) and 2-methylnaphthalene (EDA33) are
considered estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers, the detected
results for 4-chloraniline and 3-nitroaniline (EAG66-67, EAG73, and
EDA24-25) are considered estimated (J) and the nondetected results are
considered unusable (R).
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (1 to 500 vg/kg), toluene (1 vg/kg),
and methylene chloride (3 to 1,500 jig/kg) were found in the method blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
One soil sample from a soil boring was analyzed by ECOVA for volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) (Case 12388, OTR No. EDA42) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 10. The data are
qualified as follows:
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 32
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
The VOC fraction of sample EDA42 was diluted and reanalyzed as EDA42RE.
• Toluene in EDA42 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the result
for this compound in this sample is considered estimated (J). Use the results
from the diluted sample EDA42RE for this compound.
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA42RE were outside the control limits
for toluene and matrix spike duplicates were outside the control limits for the
same sample for toluene. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J)
for this compound by the CRL reviewer.
• Benzole acid (60 jig/kg) was found in the method blank. Samples associated
with this blank that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
5 times the benzoic acid concentration are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Five soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by Gulf South Environmental Labs
(GULF) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 12324, OTR Nos. EDA37, EDA41, EDA91, and EDA94-95) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 10. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of sample EDA94 was reanalyzed because of low internal
standard recoveries as EDA94RE. The internal standard recoveries were
satisfactory for EDA94RE, therefore use the results from this analysis.
• A pesticide internal standard was outside the control limits for EDA41 and the
pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered estimated (J).
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA91 were outside the control limits for
toluene, and for sample EDA94 outside the limits for phenol,
2,4-dinitrotoluene, gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and
4,4-DDT. Matrix spike duplicates were outside the control limits for EDA91
for toluene and for EDA94 outside the control limits for heptachlor. The
unspiked samples were considered estimated (J) for these compounds by the
CRL reviewer.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for methylene chloride (all
samples), acetone (all samples), and 2-butanone (EDA37, EDA41, and EDA94)
are considered estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers, the results
for 2-butanone (EDA95) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results
and unusable (R) for nondetected results.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 33
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (6 to 19 yg/kg), methylene chloride
(1 to 9 yg/kg), and 2-butanone (14 yg/kg) were found in the method blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Four soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by GULF for volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12322, OTR Nos.
EDA88-90 and EDA38) by low and medium concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table 10. The data are qualified as follows:
• Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction and pesticide/PCB fraction
extractions for EDA88. The SVOC and pesticide/PCB results for this sample
are considered estimated (flagged "J").
• Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for the pesticide/PCB surrogate
for EDA38 (181 percent), EDA88 (194 percent), EDA89 (180 percent), and
EDA89 (216 percent). The data are biased high and all pesticide/PCB results
for these samples are considered estimated (J).
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA88 were outside the control limits for
toluene, and for sample EDA89 outside the control limits for 2,4-dinitrotoulene,
phenol, gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4-DDT. The
unspiked samples were considered estimated (J) for these compounds by the
CRL reviewer.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for all pesticides (all
samples), acetone (EDA88, EDA90, and EDA38), 2-butanone (EDA88 and
EDA90), and methylene chloride (EDA88, EDA38, and EDA90), are
considered estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers, the results for
2-butanone (EDA89 and EDA38) are considered estimated (J) for all detected
results and unusable for all nondetected results (R).
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (6 to 13 yg/kg), methylene chloride
(1 to 2,800 yg/kg), and 2-butanone (14 yg/kg) were found in the method blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Three soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by MetaTRACE, Inc. (META) for
volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12037, OTR Nos. EDA14-15 and EDA18) by low and medium concentration
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 34
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
procedures.
follows:
The data results are presented in Table 10. The data are qualified as
The SVOC fractions of EDA14, EDA14RE, EDA15, EDA15RE, and EDA18
were reanalyzed because of low internal standard recoveries as EDA14RE,
EDA14DLRE, EDA15RE, EDA15DL, and EDA18RE. The VOC fraction of
sample EDA15, the SVOC fraction of EDA15RE, the SVOC fraction of
EDA14RE and the pesticide/PCB fraction of EDA15 were diluted and
reanalyzed as EDA15DL, EDA15DL, EDA14DLRE, and EDA15DLRE.
Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction analysis for EDA14DLRE
and EDA15DL and for the pesticide/PCB fraction analysis of EDA15DLRE.
All SVOC fractions for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").
All pesticide/PCB results for EDA15DLRE are considered unusable (R) for
nondetected results and estimated (J) for detected results.
GC/MS tuning requirements, specifically the retention time marker, are out of
control limits for the pesticide/PCB marker, for EDA14. All pesticide/PCB
results for this sample are considered unusable (R).
Naphthalene and 2-methynapthalene in EDA14 and EDA14RE, naphthalene,
xylene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, Aroclor-1248, Aroclor-1254 in EDA15, and
2-methylnapthalene, naphthalene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in EDA15RE
exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results for these
compounds in these samples are considered estimated (J).
The surrogate recovery of the pesticide blank (181 and 0 percent) associated
with samples EDA14, EDA15DLRE, and EDA18; EDA14 (238 percent); and
EDA15D1RE (0 percent) were out of control limits and the results are
considered estimated (J) for EDA14. The results are considered estimated (J)
for detected results, and unusable (R) for nondetected results for EDA15DLRE
and EDA18. A surrogate recovery was out of control limits for the VOC
fraction of EDA15 (78 percent) and EDA15DL (69 percent), but they were
within the control limit for reanalyses of this sample, and therefore, the CRL
reviewer did not qualify the data based on the surrogate results for sample
EDA15.
Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA15 were outside the control limits for
chlorobenzene; and for EDA15RE for 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene and
4-chloro-3-methylphenol. Matrix spike duplicates were outside the control limits
for EDA15 for pentachlorophenol. The matrix spike recoveries for the diluted
sample EDA15DL were within control limits; therefore, the CRL reviewer did
not qualify the unspiked sample based on these results. Matrix spike recoveries
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 35
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Test Pits
for sample EDA15DLRE were below control limits (0 percent) for gamma-
BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4-DDT. The results in the
unspiked sample are considered estimated (J) for detected results and unusable
(R) for all nondetected results by the CRL reviewer.
One or more SVOC internal standards were out of control limits for samples
EDA14, EDA14RE, EDA15RE, EDA15, EDA18, and EDA18RE. Compounds
associated with these internal standards for these samples are considered
estimated (J). One VOC internal standard recovery was outside control limits
for EDA18 and EDA18RE. Compounds associated with this standard in this
sample are considered estimated (flagged "J"). Results for SVOC internal
standards were satisfactory for EDA14DLRE and EDA15DL, use the SVOC
results from these two analyses.
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (2,200 jig/kg), and methylene
chloride (2,300 jig/kg) were found in the method blanks. Samples associated
with these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for all pesticides (all
samples), and 4-nitrophenol (EDA14-15, and EDA18), are considered estimated
(J).
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (25 vg/kg), toluene (2 pg/kg),
methylene chloride (8 to 80 yg/kg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (82 jig/kg), and
di-n-butylphthalate (110 pg/kg) were found in the field blanks. Chloroform
(2 pg/kg) was also found in the field blanks. Samples associated with these
blanks (all soil boring sample groups listed above) which contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory
contaminant blank concentrations, or less than 5 times the chloroform
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Twenty soil samples from test pits including two replicate sets and one field blank were
analyzed by PEI Associates, Inc. (PEI) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12010, OTR Nos. EDAOO-09, EDA11-13,
EAG84, EAG86-89, and EAG98-99) by low and medium concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 9. The data are qualified as follows:
The VOC fraction of samples EAG86, EAG98, EAG99 and EDA04 were
diluted and reanalyzed as EAG86DL, EAG98DL, EAG99DL, and EDA04DL.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 36
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
The VOC fraction of EDA06 was reanalyzed as EDA06RE because of poor
surrogate recovery.
Toluene in EDA04; ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG98 and EAG99;
1,2-dichloroethene in EAG99; and ethylbenzene in EAG86 exceeded the linear
range of the instrument and the result for these compounds in these samples
are considered estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted samples,
EAG86DL, EAG98DL, EAG99DL and EDA04DL for these compounds.
Trichloroethene in EDA02 exceeded the linear range of the instrument, but the
sample was not diluted and reanalyzed, and the results for this compound in
this sample are considered estimated (J).
Holding times were exceeded for the VOC fraction analysis for EAG98,
EAG86DL, EAG87, EAG89, EDA11, EDA12, and EDA04DL. Aromatic
compounds in these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J"). Holding
times were exceeded by more than 14 days for VOC fraction analysis for
EAG88, EAG98DL, EAG99, and EAG99DL. All VOC compounds are
considered estimated (J) for all results and aromatic compounds are considered
unusable (R) for all nondetected results for these samples. Holding times were
exceeded for the SVOC fractions extractions for EAG86 and all SVOC results
for these samples are considered estimated. Holding time to extraction for the
SVOC fraction of EAG87 and EDA08 exceeded 14 days. The SVOC results
for these samples are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and
unusable (R) for nondetected results.
Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for a VOC surrogate for EDA06
(143 percent) and EDA06RE (138 percent) and for the pesticide/PCB
surrogate for EDA04 (154 percent), EDA08 (194 percent), EDA03 (179
percent), EAG89 (169 percent), and EAG84 (160 percent). The data are
biased high and all VOC or pesticide/PCB results for these samples are
considered estimated (flagged "J"). Surrogate recoveries were not improved
with the reanalysis of EDA06, and the original sample EDA06 should be used.
Matrix spike recoveries were outside the control limits for dieldrin and
4,4'-DDT for EAG84 and for benzene and toluene for EDA04. Matrix spike
duplicates for sample EAG84 were outside the control limits for benzene and
for sample EDA04 for toluene, 1,1-dichloroethene, and benzene. The unspiked
sample was considered estimated by the CRL reviewer for these compounds.
Low area counts for one VOC internal standard for sample EAG84 was noted.
Compounds associated with this standard in this sample are considered
estimated (flagged "J").
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 37
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EDAOO-03,
EDAD06, EDA06RE, EDA08-09, EDA13, EAG84, EAG86-87, EAG86DL, and
EAG98) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R)
for nondetected results for these compounds. Also due to calibration outliers,
the detected results for benzene (EDA03, EDA06, EDA08-09, EAG84, and
EAG86), methylene chloride (EDA12, EDA04-05, EDA07, and EDA04DL),
acetone (EDA11-12, EAG89 and EDA04DL) and 2-methylnapthalene (EDA03,
EAG87) are considered estimated (J).
• Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (2 jig/kg), acetone
(1,000 jig/kg), di-n-butylphthalate (70 yg/kg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(75 jig/kg), and 2-butanone (3 to 240 ng/kg) were found in the method blanks.
Chlorobenzene (2 to 450 ng/kg) and ethylbenzene (2 vg/kg) were also found in
the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory
contaminants, and 5 times the ethylbenzene or chlorobenzene concentrations
are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Twenty soil samples from test pits including one replicate set and one field blank were
analyzed by PEI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 11960, OTR Nos. EDA10, EAG74-83, EAG85, and EAG90-97) by
low and medium concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 9.
The data are qualified as follows:
The VOC fraction of samples EAG75-77, EAG79-83, EAG85, EAG93, and
EAG97 and the SVOC fraction of sample EAG93 were diluted and reanalyzed
as EAG75-77DL, EAG79-83DL, EAG85DL, EAG93DL, and EAG97DL. The
VOC fraction of EAG80 was reanalyzed as EAG80RE because of poor
surrogate recovery.
• Holding times were exceeded for the VOC fraction analysis for EAG93DL,
EAG97DL, and EDA91. Aromatic compounds in these samples are considered
estimated (flagged "J"). Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction
extraction for EAG74, EAG83, and EAG77 and all SVOC compounds for these
samples are considered estimated (J).
• Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for more than one VOC
surrogate for EAG80 (164 and 128 percent) and EAG80RE (128, 139, and 196
percent). The data are biased high and all VOC results for these samples are
considered estimated (flagged "J"). Surrogate recoveries for the pesticide/PCB
surrogate for samples EAG74-75, EAG79-80, EAG82-83, EAG93, and EAG97
were above control limits but the CRL Reviewer determined that this was due
to coelution with an unknown compound and the data was not qualified based
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 38
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
on these results. Because surrogate recoveries were satisfactory for EAG80DL,
but not EAG80 or EAG80RE, use the results from EAG80DL.
Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAG78 were slightly outside the control
limits for 1,1-dichloroethene, and for sample EAG91 slightly outside the control
limits for 4,4-DDT. Matrix spike duplicates were slightly outside the control
limits for EAG91 for 4,4-DDT. The unspiked samples were not qualified by
the CRL reviewer based on these results.
Ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG76, EAG80, EAG82 and EAG80RE;
1,2-dichloroethene, ethylbenzene, toluene, trichloroethene, and xylene in
EAG77; toluene and xylene in EAG79, EAG85, and EAG81;
1,2-dichloroethene, ethylbenzne, toluene, and xylene in EAG75;
4-methyl-2-pentanone, ethylbenzene, toluene, trichloroethene, and xylene in
EAG83; 4-methyl-2-pentanone, ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethene, toluene,
trichloroethene, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in EAG93; and xylene in EAG97
exceeded the linear range of the instrument. The result for these compounds
in these samples are considered estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted
samples, EAG75-77DL, EAG79-83DL, EAG85DL, EAG93DL, and EAG97DL
for these compounds. Xylene in EAG93DL exceeded the linear range of the
instrument but the sample was not diluted and reanalyzed and the result for
this compound in this sample is considered estimated (J).
Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for acetone and 2-butanone
(EAG74-83, EAG85, EAG90, EAG92-97, EDA10, EAG75-77, EAG85DL,
EAG79-83DL, EAG80RE, EAG93DL, and EAG97DL), methylene chloride
(EAG91), and 2-methylnaphthalene (EAG93DL) are considered estimated (J).
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (430 to 1,100 yg/1), toluene
(280 yg/1), diethyl phthalate (420 to 29,000 yg/1), di-n-butylphthalate (56 to
2,100 yg/1), bis(2-etylhexyl)phthalate (51 yg/1), and butylbenzyl phthalate
(14 yg/1) were found in the method blanks. Chlorobenzene (3 to 370 yg/1),
phenol (58 yg/1), and pyrene (2,000 yg/1) were also found in the method
blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminants and
5 times the other contaminant blank concentrations are considered unusable
(flagged "B").
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (18 yg/kg), 2-butanone (2 yg/kg),
methylene chloride (15 to 36 yg/kg), toluene (1 yg/kg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate (100 yg/kg), butylbenzyl phthalate (38 yg/kg), di-n-butylphthalate
(100 yg/kg), diethyl phthalate (280 yg/kg), and dimetylphthalate (32 yg/kg) were
found in the field blanks. Chlorobenzene (4 to 6 yg/kg) and pyrene (38 yg/kg)
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 39
July 21, 1989
GL065561.DE.DV
were also found in the field blanks. Samples associated with these blanks (all
test pit sample groups listed above) that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant or
5 times the other compound blank concentrations are considered unusable
(flagged "B").
Two soil samples from test pits were analyzed by GULF for volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case SAS 43681, OTR Nos.
EDA22 and EDA23) by high concentration procedures. The data results are presented in
Table 10. The data are qualified as follows:
The VOC and SVOC fractions of sample EDA23 were diluted and reanalyzed
as EDA23DL.
• No holding times are established for high concentration analysis.
• The results are reported on a wet weight basis for high concentration analysis
• 4-Methyl-2-pentanone, ethylbenzene, toluene, trichlorethene, xylene, and
butylbenzyl phthalate in EDA23 exceeded the linear range of the instrument
and the results for these compounds in this sample are considered estimated.
Use the results from the diluted sample EDA23DL for these compounds.
• All surrogate compounds were diluted out for the VOC fraction for EDA22
and EDA23DL and the SVOC fraction of EDA23DL. The detected results for
EDA22 are considered estimated (J) and the nondetected results are
considered unusable (R). Surrogate recoveries were within control limits for
both the VOC and SVOC fractions of EDA23 therefore EDA23DL was not
qualified based on the surrogate recoveries. Surrogate recoveries were outside
the control limits for the PCB surrogates for EDA22 (195 and 123 percent)
and EDA23 (178 percent). The data are biased high, and all PCB results for
these samples are considered estimated (J).
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for acetone (EDA22,
EDA23, and EDA23DL), methylene chloride (EDA22 and EDA23DL),
Aroclor-1254 (all samples), and 1,2-dichloroethane (EDA23) are considered
estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone
(EDA22, EDA23, and EDA23DL) and endosulfan I, endosulfan II, endrin,
endrin ketone, heptachlor epoxide (all samples) are considered estimated for all
detected results and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (2 mg/kg), and methylene chloride
(2 to 4 mg/kg) were found in the method blanks. Samples associated with
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 40
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
SUBSURFACE SOIL—OIL AND GREASE
Seventy-nine soil samples from soil borings and test pits including five duplicate sets and
five field blanks were analyzed by SKINER for oil and grease (Case SAS 4634E, Sample
groups E01-21; E42-53; E57-62; E78-79; E80-86; E54-56; E63-77; and E22-23 and E31-41)
by SAS procedures. The data results are presented in Tables 9 and 10. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery was below control limits for sample groups E42-53
(33.9 percent), El 1-21 (64 percent), E54-56 (71 percent), E63-77 (66.4 percent)
and E22, E23, E31-41, E39 (4.1 percent). The data may be biased low and the
quantification limits may be higher than reported for this analyte. All results
for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J"). The spike sample
recovery was above control limits for sample group E01-10 (262 percent) and
sample group E57-62 (304 percent). The data may be biased high and all
results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J"). The
frequency for analysis of spike samples as specified in the SAS request for
sample group E63-77 was not followed therefore all oil and grease data are
considered estimated (J) in this sample group.
• Method duplicates were out of control limits for sample groups E78-79
(158 RPD), E42-53 (51.9 RPD), E80-85 (50.7 RPD), E54-56 (36.1 RPD), and
E22, E23, E31-41 (46 RPD) and the results for these samples are considered
estimated. The frequency of analysis for duplicate samples as specified in the
SAS request was not strictly followed for sample group E63-77, therefore all oil
and grease data are considered estimated (J) in this sample group.
• The laboratory did not report the method detection limit as specified in the
SAS request.
• Oil and grease (53.4 to 109 mg/kg) were found in the method blanks. Samples
associated with these blanks which contain oil and grease at concentrations less
than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Oil and grease (39.5 to 54 mg/kg) were found in the test pit field blanks and
oil and grease (14.9 to 210 mg/kg) were found in the soil boring field blank.
Samples associated with these blanks (all soil boring and test pit sample groups
listed above) which contain oil and grease at concentrations less than 5 times
the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 41
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
SUBSURFACE SOIL—DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSIS
Soil Borings
Twenty soil samples from soil borings including two field blanks were analyzed by AATS
for dioxins and furans (Case SAS 471 IE, Sample Nos. E01-20) by low concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 11. The data are qualified as
follows:
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for HexaCDD (E01-17) are
considered estimated (J).
Test Pits
Nineteen soil samples from test pits including two replicate sets and one field blank were
analyzed by AATS for dioxins and furans (Case SAS 4636E, Sample Nos. E01-19) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 11. The data are
qualified as follows:
Samples E01, E05-13 and E15 were reanalyzed as E01RE, E05-13RE, and
E15RE because surrogate recoveries were outside control limits.
• Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for the E13 (210 percent), E01
(182 and 276 percent), E01RE (200 and 260 percent), E05 (188 and 236
percent), E05RE (230 and 320 percent), E06 (138 and 124 percent), E06RE
(140 and 130 percent), E07 (176 percent), E07RE (130 percent), E09 (152 and
204 percent), E09RE (140 and 136 percent), E10 (144 and 176 percent),
E10RE (134 percent, Ell (236 and 200 percent), El IRE (154 and 146
percent), E13 (210, 722, and 1370 percent), E13RE (322 and 574 percent), E15
(132 and 148 percent), E15RE (132 and 128 percent). The data are biased
high for all these samples and the results are considered estimated (J).
Because surrogate recoveries were not improved with reanalysis of samples
E01, E05-07, E13, and E15, use the original data analyses.
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample E16 were outside the control limits for
HeptaCDF and 2,3,7,8 TCDD. Matrix spike duplicates were outside the
control limits for the same sample for OCDF. The unspiked samples were
considered estimated (J) for these compounds.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for HexaCDD (all samples),
HeptaCDD (E03-07, Ell, E13, E15, E17, E18, E01RE, E02RE, E07RE,
E09RE, E10RE, E11RE, E12RE, and E06RE), OCDD (E07, Ell, and E13),
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 42
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
HeptaCDF (E03-07, Ell, E13, E05RE, E13RE, E15RE, E06, E15, E17,
E06RE, and E18), HexaCDF (E03, E04, E06, £05, E15, E17, and E18) are
considered estimated (J).
SUBSURFACE SOIL—INCINERATION PARAMETERS
Soil Borings
Seven soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by Hoffman Laboratory (HOFF) for
incineration parameters including percent moisture, ash, volatile matter, fixed carbon and
heating value (Case SAS 4730E, Sample Nos. E01-07) by SAS procedures. The data
results are presented in Table 12. No qualification of the data was necessary.
Test Pits
Seven soil samples from test pits including one replicate set were analyzed by Versar, Inc.
(VERSAR) for incineration parameters including percent moisture, ash, volatile matter ,
fixed carbon, and heating value (Case SAS 4634E, Sample Nos. E24-30) by SAS
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 12. The data are qualified as
follows:
• The method duplicates exceed the control limits of +/- 50 BTU as specified in
the SAS request but the relative percent difference is 0.9 percent, therefore the
data were not qualified based on this result.
SEDIMENT—INORGANIC ANALYSIS
Twelve soil sediment samples including one replicate set were analyzed by ENSECO for
inorganic analytes (Case 12417, ITR Nos. MEAC04-05, and MEAC10-19) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 13. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The spike sample recovery for arsenic (71.1 percent) and silver (53.1 percent)
are below control limits. The data may be biased low and the quantitation
limits may be higher than reported for this compound. The spike sample
recovery for manganese (146.6 percent) is above control limits and the data
may be biased high All results for these samples are considered estimated
(flagged "J").
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects and the results for selenium (all samples except
MEAC05 and MEAC15); and thallium (all samples except MEAC17) are
considered estimated (J).
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 43
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Aluminum (7.9 mg/kg), cobalt (1.2 mg/kg), and zinc (1.5 mg/kg) were found in
the preparation blanks. Samples associated with these blanks which contain
these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations
are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• The serial dilution results (30.8 percent) for zinc indicate interference and the
results for zinc are considered estimated (J).
• The method of standard addition correlation coefficient for selenium on sample
MEAC15 was less than 0.995 and the results are considered estimated (J).
• Method duplicates were out of control limits for aluminum (49.6 RPD), arsenic
(83.3 RPD), calcium (36.9 RPD), iron (50 RPD), and manganese (39,2 RPD)
and the results for these metals are considered estimated (J) due to poor
precision.
Seven sediment samples including one replicate set were analyzed by JTC for inorganic
analytes (Case SAS 4208E, ITR Nos. MEACOO-03, MEAC06-07, and MEAC09) by high
concentration procedures. The data has not yet been received (as of March, 1990).
SEDIMENT—ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Twelve soil sediment samples including one replicate set were analyzed by COMPU for
volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF04-05, and EDF10-19) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 13. The data are qualified as follows:
• Both decanted and undecanted percent moisture determinations were given for
the SVOC and pesticide/PCB fractions of samples EDF05 and EDF12.
• Benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzo[k]fluoranthene in samples EEDF13-18 were
coeluting and could not be positively identified, therefore the results for these
two compounds are identified as one group and flagged estimated (J).
• Matrix spike duplicates were outside the control limits for EDF19 for
pentachlorophenol. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) for this
compound by the CRL reviewer.
• Methylene chloride (8 to 16 yg/kg) and acetone (8 to 19 jig/kg) were found in
the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 44
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Seven soil sediment samples including one replicate set were analyzed by Aquatec, Inc.
(AQUAI) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 12495, OTR Nos. EDFOO-03, EDF06-07, and EDF09) by high
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 13. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of sample EDFOO was diluted and reanalyzed as EDFOODL.
• High concentration samples are reported on a wet weight basis.
• EDF03, EDF06, and EDF09 were screened as low/medium level samples and
the VOC fraction was rerun by low/medium concentration analysis. The SVOC
and pesticide/PCB fractions of these three samples were also run as
low/medium level samples under another sample delivery group.
• VOC surrogates for sample EFDOO were diluted out but the undiluted sample
surrogate recoveries were within control limits, therefore, the data was not
qualified based on this result.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for 2-butanone (all samples)
are considered estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers, the results
for acetone, pentachlorophenol, heptachlor epoxide, endrin, endosulfan II,
endrin ketone (all samples) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results
and unusable (R) for nondetected results for these compounds.
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (1 to 22 mg/kg), methylene chloride
(1 to 9 mg/kg), and 2-butanone (16 to 23 mg/kg), were found in the method
blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
at concentrations less than 10 times blank concentrations are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
• Aroclor results in samples EDF01 and EDF07 are considered estimated
because the lower value from two analyses is given and the difference between
the two results relative to the lower value is greater than 25 percent.
• Xylene in EDFOO exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results
for this compound in this sample are considered estimated (J). Use the results
from the diluted sample EDFOO for this compound.
Three soil sediment samples were analyzed by Aquatec, Inc. (AQUAI) for volatile and
semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12495,
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 45
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
OTR Nos. EDF03, EDF06, and EDF09) by low concentration procedures. The data
results are presented in Table 13. The data are qualified as follows:
• These samples are originally from the sample delivery group above, as
previously noted. These samples are labeled EDF03L, EDF06L, and EDF09L
to distinguish them from the previous high concentration VOC analysis.
• Holding times were exceeded for VOC fraction analysis and SVOC and
pesticide/PCB fractions extractions and all results are considered estimated (J).
• Matrix spike duplicates for sample EDF09 were outside the control limits for
phenol, 2-chlorophenol, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, n-nitrosodiphenylamine,
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, acenapthalene, 4-nitrophenol,
2,4-dintrotoluene, pentachlorophenol, pyrene, gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin,
dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4-DDT. Matrix spike recoveries were outside the control
limits for n-nitrosdiphenylamine and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene for sample EDF09.
The unspiked sample results were considered estimated (J) for these
compounds by the CRL reviewer.
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for acetone, 2-butanone (all samples)
and trans-1,3-dichlorpropane (EDF06) are considered estimated (J) for all
detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for these compounds.
• The common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (3 to 5 jig/kg) was
found in the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain
this contaminant at concentrations less than 10 times blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Aroclor 1254 in sample EDF09 and EDF06, they are considered estimated (J)
because the reported result is below the specified reporting dilution analysis.
AMBIENT AIR
EVENT 1
Seventy ambient air carbon molecular sieve tube samples including 10 replicate sets, five
field blanks and five trip blanks were analyzed by Environmental Science and
Engineering/Hunter Environmental Services, Inc. (ESECO) for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) (Case SAS 4632E, Sample Nos. E15-28, E43-70, E99-112, and E127-140) by EPA
Method T02. The data results are presented in Table 14. The data are qualified as
follows:
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 46
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Data results from sample E52 were missing from the data package.
explanation from the laboratory was given.
No
Sample E48 was reanalyzed as E48RE. No explanation from the laboratory
was given. Use the results from the original sample, E48.
The surrogate recoveries of all of the samples (16 to 50 percent and 150 to
1826 percent) except E25, E27, E43, E45, E49, E51, E106, E128, E129,E134,
E136, and E138 were outside control limits. All VOC results for the samples
except those previously listed are considered estimated. Samples E48, E48RE,
and E99 had one or more surrogate recovery at 0 percent. All VOC results
for these samples are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and
unusable (R) for all nondetected results.
Matrix spike recoveries for E25 for 1,1-dichloroethene and chlorobenzene; for
E65 for trichloroethene, benzene, toluene, chlorobenzene; for E133 or
1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, benzene, and chlorobenzene were outside
the control limits. Matrix spike duplicates were out of control limits for E25
for 1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, toluene, and chlorobenzene; for E65 for
1,1-dichloroethene, toluene, and chlorobenzene; and for E133 for
1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, benzene, toluene, and chlorobenzene. The
results in the unspiked samples are considered estimated (J) for by the CRL
reviewer for these compounds.
Because of calibration outliers, the positive results for chloromethane,
methylene chloride, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and benzene (E43-56,
E48RE, E15-28, E57-58, and E61); acetone (E16-48, E57-58, and E61); carbon
tetrachloride (E16-28, E57-58, E61); 1,1,2-trichoroethane and tetrachoroethene
(E43-48, E48RE, E16-28, E57-58, and E61); toluene and xylene (E49-58,
E15-28, E57-58, and E61); chloromethane, methylene chloride, benzene, and
xylene (E62-70, E59-60, E99-112, and E127-135); chloromethane, benzene, and
methylene chloride (E136-140); carbon tetrachloride and trichloroethene
(E62-70, E59-60, E99-103, and E127-135); toluene (E62-70, E59-60, E99-104,
and E112); ethylbenzene (E127-135); and styrene (E62-66, E69-70, and
E104-112) are considered estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers,
the results for carbon tetrachloride (E43-56, E48RE, E49-56, E15, and
E104-112); 1,1,2-trichoroethane and tetrachlorethene (E49-56, and E15),
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (E43-70, E48RE, E15, E16-23, E24-28, E99-112, and
E127-135, E136-140), ethylbenzene (E62-70, E59-60, E99-103, and E104-112),
and styrene (E67-68, E59-60, E99-103) are considered estimated (J) for all
detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for this compounds.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 47
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (36 to 220 ng/tube), methylene
chloride (43 to 490 ng/tube), and toluene (26 to 180 ng/tube) were found in the
method blanks. Chloromethane (11 to 430 ng/tube), 1,1,2-trichloroethane (25
to 59 ng/tube), 1,1-dichloroethene (50 ng/tube), trichlorethene (24 to
78 ng/tube), tetrachloroethene (30 to 270 ng/tube), benzene (33 to
220 ng/tube), chlorobenzene (53 to 200 ng/tube), styrene (47 to 170 ng/tube),
ethylbenzene (38 to 75 ng/tube), and xylene (42 to 240 ng/tube) were also
found in the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain
the common laboratory contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times, or
less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged
"B").
• One or more internal standard was out of control limits for samples E18, E20,
E21, E23, E24, E28, E43, E44, E47, E48, E48RE, E49, E50, E55, E57, E58,
E60-68, E70, E99, E101-107, E109-111, E127-136, E138, and E140, and the
results for compounds associated with these standards, are all considered
estimated (J) for these samples.
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (4.5 jig/m3), toluene (2.4 to
27 jig/m3), methylene chloride (4 to 39 jig/m3) were found in the field or trip
blanks. Benzene (1.2 to 2.3 jig/m3), chlorobenzene (2.6 to 8.5 ]ig/m3)
chloromethane (2.1 to 115 pg/'mS), ethylbenzene (1.6 to 46 jig/m3), styrene
(1.3 to 55 jig/m3), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (55 vg/m3), and xylene (1.6 to
105 ]ig/m3) were also found in the field or trip blanks. Samples associated with
these blanks which contain the common laboratory contaminants at
concentrations less than 10 times or less than 5 times the blank concentrations
are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Samples with breakthrough between front and back MCS tubes are considered
estimated for those compounds (flagged "J") (Table 10-4).
• Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits are listed in Table 10-5 and the
results are considered estimated (J).
Seventy ambient air tenax tube samples including ten replicate sets, and five field and five
trip blanks were analyzed by PEI for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Case
SAS 4632E, Sample Nos. E01-14, -42, E71-98, and El 13-126) by EPA Method T01. The
data results are presented in Table 15. The data are qualified as follows:
• Samples Ell, E12, E71, E72, El 19 and E120 were sent in to be analyzed as
MS/MSD samples but the laboratory did not use them for that purpose. They
are considered replicate samples and labeled Ell A and El IB, etc. The tube
for E85 was broken and thus not analyzed.
-------
TABLE 10-4
C 4 H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
CMS--EVENT 1
Samples E15.E16 E17.E1B E43.E44 E65.E66 E135.E136 E137.E138
Chemical
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE X X
BENZENE X X
CARBON DISULFIDE X
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE X X
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE X
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL) X X
-------
TABLE 10-5
C & H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL LIMITS
CMS--EVENT 1
samples
Cliemi cal
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROBEN2ENE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E21.E23 E22.E24 E45.E47 E46.E48 E61.E63 E99.E100 E135.E137 E136.E138
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 48
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Because of calibration outliers, the positive results for acetone (E89-98,
E113-118, E119A, E119B, E120A, E120B, E121-126), 4-methyl-2-pentanone
(E12A, E12B, E14, E29-37, E01-10, E11A, E111B, E13), 2-butanone (E01-10,
E11A, E11B, E13, E12A, E12B, E14, E29-37, E115-118, E119A, E119B,
E120A, E120B, E121-126) are considered estimated (J). Also because of
calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (E76-84, E86-88, E89-98, El 13,
El 14) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R)
for nondetected results for this compound.
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (17 to 44 ng/tube), methylene
chloride (11 to 19 ng/tube), 2-butanone (24 to 55 ng/tube) were found in the
method blanks. Chlorobenzene (8 ng/tube), ethylbenzene (4 ng/tube), styrene
(3 to 7 ng/tube), and xylene (3 to 8 ng/tube) were also found in the method
blanks. Samples associated with these blanks which contain the common
laboratory contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times or the other
contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
GC/MS tuning time limit was exceeded for sample E126 and the results are
considered estimated (J).
Several compounds exceeded the linear range of the instrument in several
samples, but reanalysis of these samples were not possible because of the
nature of the media. The results for these compounds in the samples are
considered estimated (J).
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (1.1 to 3 pg/m3), toluene (0.1 to
1 iig/m3), 2-butanone (0.9 to 3.1 yg/m3), methylene chloride (0.4 to 1.3 ]ig/m3)
were found in the field or trip blanks. Benzene (0.2 pg/m3), carbon disulfide
(0.2 pg/m3), chlorobenzene (0.4 yg/m3), ethylbenzene (0.2 to 0.3 jig/m3),
1,1,1-trichloroethane (0.8 to 5.5 iig/m3), and xylene (0.1 to 1.2 yg/m3) were also
found in the field or trip blanks. Samples associated with these blanks which
contain the common laboratory contaminants at concentrations less than
10 times or the other contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Samples with breakthrough between front and back TENAX tubes are
considered estimated for those compounds (flagged "J") (Table 10-6).
Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits are listed in Table 10-7 and
results are considered estimated (J).
-------
page 1 of 2
TABLE 10-6
C & H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
TENAX--EVENT 1
Samples
Chemical
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE
BENZENE
BROMOMETHANE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E03.E04 E05.E06 E07.EOB E09.E10 E11A.E12A E11B.E12B E29.E30 E37.E38 E71A.E72A E71B.E72B E73.E74 E75.E76 E77.E78
-------
page 2 of 2
TABLE 10-6
C 8 H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
TENAX--EVENT 1
Samples E79.E80 E81.E82 E87.E88 E89.E90 E91,E92 E95.E96 E119A.E120
Chemical
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE X
BENZENE X
BROMOMETHANE
CARBON DISULFIDE X
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE X X
CHLOROMETHANE X
ETHYL BENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE XX XXX
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
-------
TABLE 10-7
C * H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL LIMITS
TENAX--EVENT 1
page 1 of 2
samples
chemical
1.1.1 -TRICHLOROE THANE
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIOE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROME THANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TR I CHLOROE THENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E07.E09
E08.E10
E11A.E11B EUA.E12B E31.E33
E32.E34
E71A.E71B E72A.E72B E75.E77
E76.E78 E66.E68
-------
page 2 ol 2
TABLE 10-7
C « H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL LIMITS
TENAX--EVENT 1
Samples E119A.E119B E120A.E120B E121.E123 E122.E124
chemical
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE X
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE X X
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROME THANE X
ETHYLBENZENE X
METHYLENE CHLORIDE XX X
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE X
TRICHLOROETHENE X
XYLENE (TOTAL)
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 49
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Ten ambient air polyurethane foam samples including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by PEI for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and pesticides/PCBs
(Case SAS 4633E, Sample Nos. E01-10) by EPA Method T010. The data results are
presented in Table 16. The data are qualified as follows:
• The surrogate recovery of the pesticide surrogate was below control limits (0
percent) for E06. All pesticide results for this sample is considered estimated
(J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.
• Matrix spike recoveries for all samples were outside the control limits for all
SVOC compounds (32 to 74 percent) , aldrin (33 percent), dieldrin (44
percent), endrin (22 percent) 4,4-DDT (135 percent), 2,4-dinitrophenol (0
percent), alpha-BHC (0 percent), beta-BHC (0 percent), gamma BHC (0
percent), and endosulfan sulfate (0 percent). The results in the all sample are
considered estimated (J) for these compounds by the CRL reviewer.
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for all pesticides (all
samples) are considered estimated (J).
• A common laboratory contaminant, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (2 ng/tube) was
found in the method blanks. Phenol (2 ng/tube) was also found in the method
blank. Samples associated with these blanks which contain the common
laboratory contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times or the other
contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
EVENT 2
Seventy ambient air carbon molecular sieve and 70 tenax tube samples including
20 replicate sets, 10 field blanks, and 10 trip blanks were analyzed by ESECO for volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) (Case No. SAS 4632E, Sample Nos. EO1-140) by EPA Method
T01 and T02. The data results are presented in Tables 17 (CMS) and 18 (TENAX). The
data are qualified as follows:
• Samples E23, E130, E134, and E139 lost packing material during sample
preparation and were not analyzed, E77 was inadvertently injected before the
GC/MS was ready and some loss of volatile organic compounds may have
occurred. The results for these samples are considered estimated (J). E124
was missing a cap during shipment and therefore may have been exposed to
the atmosphere. The results for E124 also are considered estimated (J).
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 50
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
CMS
Sample E124, a tenax back tube, contained a large number of compounds not
found in the corresponding front tube. It is suspected that the tube was
contaminated and the results should not be used.
For samples E127, E128, El 13, El 14, E93, and E94, the sample volume was
not recorded, and the volume is estimated. All sample results are considered
estimated (flagged with "*").
The surrogate recoveries (13 to 48 percent and 151 to 1188 percent) of
samples all samples except E45, E84, E100, and E108, were outside control
limits. All VOC results for the samples except those previously listed are
considered estimated. Samples E77, E83, E106, and El 11 had one or more
surrogate recoveries of 0 to 9 percent. All VOC results for these samples are
considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for all
nondetected results.
Matrix spike recoveries for E105 and E106 were outside the control limits for
1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, and toluene; E71 and E72 for
1,1-dichloroethene, benzene, toluene, and chlorobenzene; E133 and E134 for
1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, benzene, and toluene. Matrix spike
duplicates were out of control limits for E105 and E106 and E133 and E134
for 1,1-dichoroethene, trichloroethene, benzene, toluene, and chlorobenzene,
and E71 and E72 for 1,1-dichlorethene, toluene, and chlorobenzene. The
results in the unspiked samples are considered estimated (J) for by the CRL
reviewer.
Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for chloromethane, acetone,
chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and xylene (all samples) are considered
estimated (J). Also due to calibration outliers, the results for
1,1,2,2-tetrachlorethane (E15-21, E43-50, E71-79, E103-108, E133, E136-138,
and E140), ethylbenzene (E15-21), carbon tetrachloride (E51-56 and E73-75)
and acetone (E73-75) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and
unusable (R) for nondetected results for this compounds.
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (3 ng/tube), methylene chloride (6
to 190 ng/tube), and toluene (3 to 34 ng/tube) were found in the method
blanks. Chloromethane (17 to 410 ng/tube), trichloroethene (3 to 9 ng/tube),
1,1,2-trichloroethane (1 to 17 ng/tube), tetrachlorethene (1 to 23 ng/tube),
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethene (75 to 160 ng/tube), styrene (5 to 350 ng/tube),
ethylbenzene (2 to 84 ng/tube), xylene (3 to 130 ng/tube), and chlorbenzene (65
ng/tube) were found in the method blanks. Samples associated with these
blanks which contain the common laboratory contaminants at concentrations
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 51
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
TENAX
less than 10 times or less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
One or more internal standards were out of control limits for samples E18,
E20-22, E24-28, E43-46, E48, E52, E53, E56, E71-79, E82-84, E99, E100,
E102-106, E108, E110, Bill, E127, E129, E131, E135, E137, and E138, and
the results for compounds associated with these standards are considered
estimated (J) for these samples.
Samples with breakthrough between the front and back CMS tubes are
considered estimated for those compounds (flagged "J") (Table 10-8).
Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits are listed in Table 10-9 and the
results are considered estimated (J).
Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (0.5 jig/m3), toluene (0.3 to
0.9 vig/m3), and methylene chloride (1.1 to 54.2 yg/m3) were found in the field
or trip blanks. Benzene (23.3 ]ig/m3), chlorobenzene (0.3 to 0.6 yg/m3),
chloromethane (7.1 jig/m3), ethylbenzene (0.04 to 0.1 ]ig/m3),
1,1,2-trichloroethane (0.4 ji/m3), trichloroethene (0.2 ng/m3), 1,1-dichloroethene
(0.4 jig/m3), styrene (0.1 to 1.5 >ig/m3), and xylene (0.1 to 1.2 jig/m3) were also
found in the field or trip blanks. Samples associated with these blanks which
contain the common laboratory contaminants at concentrations less than
10 times, or concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
The surrogate recoveries of samples E34, E36, E38-42, E65, E58-62, E67, and
E85-89 (156 to 210 percent) were outside control limits and the results are
biased high and are considered estimated (J).
Matrix spike recoveries for E57 and E58, E91 and E92, and El 19 and 120
were outside the control limits for toluene. Matrix spike duplicates were out of
control limits for El 19 and E120 for toluene. The results in the unspiked
samples are considered estimated (J) for this compound by the CRL reviewer.
Because of calibration outliers, the positive results for chloromethane,
bromomethane, vinyl chloride, chloroethane, methylene chloride, carbon
disulfide, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, chloroform,
1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1,1,-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, vinyl acetate,
bromodichoromethane, 1,2-dichlorpropane, trichloroethene, benzene,
cis-l,3-dichloropropene, bromoform, tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2,-tetrachloethane,
-------
TABLE 10-8
C & H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
CMS--EVENT 2
page i ol 2
Samples
Chemical
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 . 2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E17.E18 E19.E20 E21.E22 E25.E26 E43.E44 E45.E46 E51.E52 E71.E72 E73.E74 E75.E76 E79.E80 E81.E82 E99.E100
X . X
X
X
-------
page 2 ol 2
TABLE 10-8
C & H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
CMS--EVENT 2
Samples £10I.E102 E103.E104 E105.E106 E107.E108 E109.E110 E131.E132 E135.E136 E137.E138
chemical
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE X
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE X
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE X X
CHLOROBENZENE X X
CHLOROMETHANE XXX
ETHYLBENZENE XX X XX
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE . X
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE X X
XYLENE (TOTAL) X
-------
TABLE 10-9
G & H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL LIMITS
CMS--EVENT 2
samples
Chemical
1.1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E17.E19 E18.E20 E49.E51 E75.E77 E76.E78 E107.E109 E108.E110 E127.E128
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 52
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
toluene, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and xylene (all samples) are
considered estimated (J). Also because of calibration outliers, the results for
acetone, 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-hexanone (all samples), and
1,1,2,2-tetrachoroethane (E40-42, E57-62, and E68) are considered estimated (J)
for all detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for this
compounds.
Carbon disulfide (28 ng/tube), benzene (3 ng/tube), 4-methyl-2-pentanone (45 to
480 ng/tube), styrene (5 to 140 ng/tube), xylene (5 to 160 ng/tube),
chlorobenzene (5 ng/tube), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (140 to 250 ng/tube),
bromoform (18 to 79 ng/tube), and ethylbenzene (9 to 180 ng/tube), were
found in the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks which
contain contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
One or more internal standard was out of control limits for samples E41 and
E70 and the results for compounds associated with these standards are
considered estimated (J) for these samples.
Common laboratory contaminants, toluene (0.3 to 10.8 pgym3) and methylene
chloride (0.6 to 17.5 jig/m3) were found in the field or trip blanks. Carbon
disulfide (0.4 yg/m3), benzene (0.1 to 0.4 jig/m3), ethylbenzene (0.5 yg/m3),
trichloroethene (0.2 ]ig/m3), styrene (0.3 pg/m3), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (0.8 yg/1)
and xylene (0.1 to 3 jig/m3) were also found in the field or trip blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks which contain the common laboratory
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times, or less than 5 times the
blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Samples with breakthrough from front to back tubes exceeded control limits for
Tenax are listed in Table 10-10, and the results are considered estimated (J)
for these compounds in the listed samples.
Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits are listed in Table 10-11. Results
are considered estimated (J) for the compounds in the listed samples.
ROUND 31—FIELD SAMPLING
GROUNDWATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES
Eighteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets, and two
field blanks were analyzed by KEYTX for inorganic analytes (Case 12961, ITR
Nos. MEBF37-38, MEBF41-42, MEBF44-46, MEBF48, MEBF50, MEBF56-60,
MEBF66-67, and MEBF75-76) by low concentration procedures. The data results are
presented in Table 19. The data are qualified as follows:
-------
TABLE 10-10
C & H LAM>FILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
TENAX--EVENT 2
Samples
ChemicaI
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE
BENZENE
BROMOME THANE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E03.ECM E09.E10 E1I.E12 E29.E30 E31.E32 E33.E34 E35.E36 E39.E40 E67.E68 Et1S.El 16 El 21.E122
-------
TABLE 10-11
. C 4 H LANDFILL
SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL LIMITS
TENAX--EVENT 2
Samples E03.E05 E04.E06 E35.E37 E36.E38 E61.E63 E93.E95 E113.E115 E114.E116
Chemical
1.1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE X X
1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE X
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE XX XX
CARBON DISULFIDE X XXX
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE X XX
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM X
CHLOROME THANE X X
ETHYLBENZENE X X
METHVLENE CHLORIDE XXX X
TETRACHLOROETHENE X X X X
TOLUENE XXX
TRICHLOROETHENE X X
XYLENE (TOTAL) X X
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 53
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• The spike sample recovery for cadmium (133 percent) is above control limits.
The data may be biased high, and all detected results for these samples are
considered estimated (flagged "J").
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
lead (MEBF38, MEBF42, MEBF44-46, MEBF48, MEBF50, MEBF56-60, and
MEBF 75-76); arsenic (MEBF45, MEBF48, MEBF50, MEBF58, MEBF60, and
MEBF75); selenium (MEBF37-38, MEBF44, MEBF50, MEBF56-57, MEBF60,
and MEBF75-76); and thallium (MEBF42, MEBF44-46, MEBF48, MEBF50,
MEBF56-60, MEBF66-67, and MEBF75-76).
Calcium (74 to 97.2 jig/l), chromium (5.1 jig/1), copper (11.2 to 15.2 jig/1), and
iron (24.9 to 45.84 vg/1) were found in the calibration or preparation blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
• Field duplicates for samples MEBF57 and MEBF76 were out of control limits
for arsenic, manganese, and selenium. The results for these analytes are
considered estimated (J) in these samples. Field duplicates for samples
MEBF45 and MEBF48 were out of control limits for zinc and the results for
this analyte are considered estimated (J) in these samples.
Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and one
field blank were analyzed by KEYTX for inorganic analytes (Case 12916, ITR
Nos. MEBFOO-01, MEBF20, MEBF27, MEBF32-36, MEBF39-40, MEBF43, MEBF49,
MEBF51, MEBF54, MEBF61, MEBF63-64, and MEBF73-74) by low concentration
procedures. The data results are presented in Table 19. The data are qualified as
follows:
• The spike sample recovery for cadmium (146 percent) is above control limits.
The data may be biased high, and all detected results for these samples are
considered estimated (flagged "J").
The spike sample recovery for iron (58.6 percent), selenium (68 percent), and thallium
(29 percent) are below control limits. The data may be biased low, quantitation limits may
be higher than reported for these analytes, and the data are considered estimated (J) for
iron and selenium. For thallium, the data are considered estimated (J) for all detected
results and unusable (flagged "R") for all nondetected results.
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
lead (MEBF32-33, MEBF35-36, MEBF39-40, MEBF43, MEBF51, MEBF54,
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 54
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
MEBF61, and MEBF63-64, and MEBF73-74; arsenic (MEBF01); selenium
(MEBFOO, MEBF35-36, MEBF40, MEBF43, MEBF64, and MEBF73); and
thallium (MEBF01, MEBF20, MEBF32, MEBF34, MBEF35, MEBF43, and
MEBF54).
• Method duplicates were outside the control limits for arsenic (25.9 RPD) and
the results for this compound are considered estimated (J) because of poor
precision.
Copper (12.4 to 17.5 yg/1), iron (33.3 yg/1), nickel (34.8 yg/1), thallium (4.9 yg/1),
and zinc (8.1 yg/1) were found in the preparation or calibration blanks.
Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two samples of replicate sets
were analyzed by Weyerhaeuser Company (WEYER) for inorganic analytes (Case 12961,
ITR Nos. MEBF02-19, MEBF21, and MEBF22) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 19. The data are qualified as follows:
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
lead (MEBF07 and MEBF09); thallium (MEBF03, MEBF12, MEBF15,
MEBF16, and MEBF18); and selenium (MEBF04-08, MEBF11-13, MEBF15-18,
and MEBF21-22).
Antimony (17.7 to 21 iig/1), cadmium (2 yg/1), calcium (19.6 to 63.2 yg/1), lead
(2.9 yg/1), magnesium (183.4 to 259.8 yg/1), potassium (374.2 to 534 yg/1),
sodium (16 to 61.7 yg/1), and vanadium (2.8 to 3.3 yg/1) were found in the
calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that
contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Eighteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set, two
samples of replicate sets, and three field blanks were analyzed by WEYER for inorganic
analytes (Case 12961, ITR Nos. MEBF23-25, MEBF28-31, MEBF47, MEBF52-53,
MEBF55, MEBF62, MEBF65, and MEBF68-72) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 19. The data are qualified as follows:
• Holding times were exceeded for mercury analysis and all mercury results are
considered estimated (J).
• The spike sample recovery for lead (0 percent) and thallium (74.8 percent) are
below control limits. The data may be biased low, quantitation limits may be
higher than reported for these analytes, and the data are considered estimated
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 55
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
(J) for thallium. For lead, the data are considered estimated (J) for all
detected results and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.
• The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
selenium (MEBF23-25, MEBF28-31, MEBF47, MEBF52, MEBF53, MEBF55,
MEBF62, and MEBF69); arsenic (MEBF23-24 and MEBF31); and thallium
(MEBF23-24, MEBF29, MEBF53, MEBF55, and MEBF69).
• The serial dilution results for zinc (47.4 percent) indicate interference and the
results for this element are considered estimated (J).
• Aluminum (151.4 yg/1), arsenic (1.3 to 1.4 yg/1), calcium (8 to 41.4 yg/1), cobalt
(1.0 jig/1), iron (10.9 jig/1), lead (3.0 yg/1), and sodium (11.7 to 641.3 vg/1) were
found in the calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with the
blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Aluminum (77.7 to 95.6 pg/1), arsenic (1.1 to 1.2 jig/1), barium (1.6 to 3.5 pgfl),
calcium (67.2 to 811 vg/1), copper (13.7 vg/1), iron (17.6 to 55.2 yg/1), lead
(4.7 jig/1), magnesium (130 to 268 vg/1), manganese (1.1 yg/1), sodium (146 to
1,230 jig/1), and zinc (7.4 to 9.8 yg/1) were found in the field blanks. Samples
associated with these blanks (all groundwater sample groups listed above) that
contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
GROUNDWATER—ORGANIC ANALYSES
Seven monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by PEI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR Nos. EEY09-11, EEY23-24, and
EEY71-72) by low concentration procedures. One trip blank was also analyzed for volatile
organic compounds as part of this sample group (EFQ78). The data results are presented
in Table 19. The data are qualified as follows:
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY24 were slightly outside the control
limits for 1,1-dichloroethene, phenol, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 4-nitrophenol,
2,4-dinitrotoluene, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4'-DDT. The matrix spike duplicate
RPD was slightly outside the control limits for the same sample for
1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, and pyrene. The unspiked sample
was not qualified by the CRL reviewer based on these results.
• Although the quality control criteria for confirmation columns for pesticides
were not met, the data were not qualified based on this result because no
pesticides were detected.
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 56
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (3 vg/1), was found in
the method blank. Samples associated with this blank that contain this
contaminant at concentrations less than ten times blank concentrations are
considered unusable (flagged "B").
Nineteen monitoring well groundwater samples including two replicate sets and two field
blanks were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs
and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR Nos. EEY36-38, EEY41-42,
EEY44-46, EEY48, EEY50, EEY56-60, EEY66-67, and EEY75-76) by low concentration
procedures. One trip blank was also analyzed for volatile organic compounds as part of
this sample group (EEY99). The data results are presented in Table 19. The data are
qualified as follows:
• The VOC fraction of samples EEY41 and EEY46 were diluted and reanalyzed
as EEY41RE and EEY46RE.
• Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction extractions for EEY48 and
all SVOC results for this sample are considered estimated (J).
• Xylene in EEY46, and xylene and toluene in EEY41 exceeded the linear range
of the instrument and the results for these compounds in these samples are
considered estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted sample, EEY46RE
and EEY41RE, for these compounds.
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY59 were outside the control limits for
4-chloro-3-methylphenol, pentachlorophenol, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene,
gamma-BHC, and 4,4'-DDT. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the
control limits for the same sample for 4-nitrophenol, gamma-BHC, and
4,4'-DDT. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) for these
compounds by the CRL reviewer.
• Because of calibration outliers, the positive results are considered estimated (J)
for methylene chloride (EEY36-38, EEY41, EEY41RE, EEY42, EEY44-45, and
EEY50), 1,2-dichloroethene (EEY36-38, EEY41-42, EEY41RE, EEY44-45,
EEY48, EEY50, EEEY56-57, EEY59, EEY75-76, and EEY99), benzoic acid
(EEY48, EEY50, EEY56-58, EEY60, EEY66, EEY75-76), 3-nitroaniline
(EEY48), and bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (EEY36-38, EEY41-42, and EEY59).
Also because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EEY58,
EEY46RE, EEY60, EEY66, and EEY67) are considered estimated (J) for all
detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for these compounds.
• A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (1 jig/1), was found in a
method blank. Samples associated with this blank that contain these
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 57
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the contaminant
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Field duplicates for samples EEY45 and EEY48 were out of control limits for
3-nitroaniline, phenanthrene, phenol, and 4,4-DDD, and the results for these
compounds are considered estimated (J) in these samples.
• Field duplicates for samples EEY57 and EEY76 were out of control limits.
The results are considered estimated (J) in these samples for benzene, xylene,
benzoic acid, naphthalene, phenol, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethene,
1,2-dichloroethene, 2-butanone, ethylbenzene, styrene, toluene, trichloroethene,
2-methylphenol, and diethylphthalate.
Eleven monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by PEI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR No. EEY25, EEY28-31, EEY47,
EEY52-53, EEY62, EEY65, and EEY70) by low concentration procedures. Two trip
blanks were also analyzed for volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group
(EFQ76-77). The data results are presented in Table 19. The data are qualified as
follows:
The SVOC fraction of sample EEY47 was reanalyzed as EEY47RE because of
internal standards outside control limits. The SVOC fraction of EEY52 was
dilated and reanalyzed as EEY52DL.
• Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in EEY52 exceeded the linear range of the
instrument and the result for this compound in this sample is considered
estimated (J). Use the result from the diluted sample, EEY52DL, for this
compound.
• For sample EDF47, the internal standard area counts were out of the control
limits for one SVOC internal standard. The sample was reanalyzed as
EEY47RE with the same results. Compounds associated with this standard in
these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J") for all detected results
and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY29 were slightly outside the control
limits for dieldrin. The unspiked sample was not qualified by the CRL
reviewer based on these results. Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY29
were outside the control limits for 4-nitrophenol and pentachlorophenol. The
unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) for these compounds by the
CRL reviewer.
• Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (9 yg/1) and 2-butanone (6 yg/1),
were found in the method blank. 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (3 pig/1) and
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 58
.July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
2-hexanone (3 pg/1) were also found in the method blanks. Samples associated
with these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
10 times the common laboratory contaminant, or 5 times the other compound
blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by PEI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR Nos. EEY02-08, EEY12-19, EEY21-22,
EEY55, and EEY68-69) by low concentration procedures. The data results are presented
in Table 19. The data are qualified as follows:
• Surrogate spike recoveries were low for the pesticide surrogate for EEY06
(21 percent). All pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered
estimated (flagged "J").
• Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for chloroethane (EEY02,
EEY04-05, EEY07, EEY12, EEY14-19, EEY55, and EEY68) are considered
estimated (J).
• Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY05 were outside the control limits for
dieldrin. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) by the CRL
reviewer.
• Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (1 jig/1), acetone (7 to
22 jig/1), and 2-butanone (6 to 9 yg/1) were found in the method blanks.
Bromoform (2 pg/1), 2-hexanone (3 to 6 jig/1), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (2 to
4 jig/1), and 4-methyl-2-pentanone (3 to 4 jig/1) were also found in the method
blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant
concentrations or 5 times the other contaminant concentrations, are considered
unusable (flagged "B").
Nineteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and one
field blank were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR Nos. EEYOO-01, EEY20,
EEY27, EEY32-35, EEY39-40, EEY43, EEY49, EEY51, EEY54, EEY61, EEY63-64, and
EEY73-74) by low concentration procedures. One trip blank was also analyzed for volatile
organic compounds as part of this sample group (EFQ79). The data results are presented
in Table 19. The data are qualified as follows:
The VOC fraction of sample EEY20 was diluted and reanalyzed as EEY20RE.
• Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EEY20RE, EEY32,
and EEY35) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable
(R) for nondetected results for this compound. Because of calibration outliers,
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 59
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
the positive results for chloroethane (EEYOO-01 and EEY20) and acetone
(EEYOO-01 and EEY20) are considered estimated (J).
• The matrix spike recoveries were outside the control limits for
4-chloro-3-methylphenol, pentachlorophenol, pyrene, and gamma-BHC for
EEY51. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) by the CRL
reviewer for these compounds.
• 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (1 yg/1) was found in the method blank. Samples
associated with this blank that contain this contaminant at concentrations less
than 5 times the blank concentration are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• In EEY20, xylene exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results
for this compounds in this sample are considered estimated (J). Use the
results from the diluted sample, EEY20RE, for this compound.
• Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (1 to 77 pg/1), acetone
(26 ]ig/l), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (90 jig/1), and toluene (5 to 7 yg/1) were
found in the field or trip blanks. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (1 to 2 jig/1) was also
found in the field or trip blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that
contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common
laboratory contaminant concentrations, or 5 times the other contaminant
concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Field duplicates for samples EEY40 and EEY74 were out of control limits for
ethylbenzene, and the results for this compound are considered estimated (J) in
these samples. Field duplicates for samples EEY51 and EEY27 were out of
control limits for chloroethane, benzoic acid, and phenol, and the results for
these compounds are considered estimated (J) in these samples.
GROUNDWATER—CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Twenty-three groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and
two field blanks were analyzed by ICM for TDS, alkalinity, COD, TOC, total phosphate,
ammonia, nitrate plus nitrite, chloride, sulfate, and oil and grease (Case SAS 4987E,
Sample Nos. E01-05 and E36-53) by low concentration procedures. Eighteen samples of
this sample group were also analyzed for BOD (E36-53). The data results are presented
in Table 20. The data are qualified as follows:
• BOD (2 mg/1) was found in a field blank. Samples associated with this blank
that contain BOD at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations
are considered unusable (flagged "B").
• Field duplicates for samples E49 and E53 were out of control limits for BOD,
COD, TOC, and sulfate and the results for these analytes are considered
-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 60
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
estimated (J) in these samples. Field duplicates for samples EEY51 and EEY27
were out of control limits for chloroethane, benzoic acid, and phenol and the
results for these compounds are considered estimated (J) in these samples.
GLT959/012.50
-------
21-Dec-89
Table 1
(Page 1 of 6)
G & H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS - INORGANIC ANALYSIS
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH01A-01
MET 269
11/29/88
46.6
202
138000
10300
42000
118
23700
47600
R
504 B
GH01B-01
MET270
11/29/88
14.8
253
78200
993
27000
26.4
3700 J
16200
R
746 B
GH01C-01
MET280
12/02/88
1440
216000
368
95700
56
6530 J
1180000 J
27 JB
GH02A-01
MEBG03
12/01/88
30.3 JB
45.4
542
119000
6 JB
12500
43400
112
50500
101000
569 JB
GH02B-01
MEBG02
12/01/88
34.6 JB
19.5
356
97500
4.6 J
4 J
6.1 JB
4580
58600
34.2
15.8 J
18700
128000
239 JB
GH02C-01
MEBG08
12/02/88
6.1 J
176 J
42400
126 B
26300
13 J
2850 J
172000
37.2 JB
GH03A-01
MEU496
12/01/88
42.7 JB
1.8 J
274
129000
8.5 JB
570
54200
649
18.8 J
47400
118000
232 JB
GH04B-01
MET278
11/30/88
33.2 JB
38.4
294
75100
4.5 JB
1030
39800
54.2 B
8 J
4260 J
66500
468 JB
GH04C-01
MET277
11/30/88
32 JB
89.3 J
20300
3.4 JB
53.6 JB
12700
11.2 J
1880 J
125000
23.7 JB
GH05A-01
MET279
12/02/88
136 J
140000
9650
2.4 J
106000
884
21.3 J
23200
111000
1080 JB
GH06A-01
MEU498
12/01/88
42.6 JB
45.4
454
173000
8.9 J
6 JB
12200
61900
636
21.6 J
50100
137000
4.5 J
80 JB
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
-------
21-Dec-89
Table 1
(Page 2 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH06B-01
MEU499
12/01/88
25.6 JB
316
810
116000
9 J
13500
3.1 J
80100
49.7
35.8 J
82500
194000
534 JB
GH07A-01
MET275
11/30/88
20.1
264
10800
4640
53400
45.1
13.7 J
4610 J
150000
122 JB
GH08C-01
MEBG09
12/02/88
8.7 J
636
76100
597
36100
14.6 J
3840 J
511000
88.3 JB
GH10A-01
MET271
11/29/88
2.7 J
1140
129000
1730
61400
36.4
5310
788000
R
48.4 B
GH10B-01
MET272
11/29/88
37.7 JB
96 J
131000
5.1 JB
139 B
42100
82.5
8.4 J
3550 J
1.1 J
161000
1110 JB
GH10C-01
MET273
11/29/88
33.1 JB
113 J
151000
4.1 J
3.9 JB
22.5 JB
46900
10.3 JB
8.1 J
2950 J
2.3 J
219000
150 JB
GH11B-01
MEBG05
12/01/88
33.9 JB
3.7 J
340
91400
5.5 JB
1640
33400
53.2
8340
55000
55.1 JB
GH12A-01
MEU500
12/01/88
40.7 JB
43
268
141000
10.2 JB
14400
41700
237
16800
65400
121 JB
GH12B-01
MEBGOO
12/01/88
5.4 J
192 J
93400
1390
24400
113
3450 J
1 J
27700
115 JB
GH13B-01
MET284
11/30/88
32.6 JB
24.7
257
110000
5.5 JB
6010
35800
169
13400
55400
59.7 JB
FRGH13B-99
MET289
11/30/88
51.2 JB
25.1
257
111000
9.5 JB
6630
36000
170
13700
56300
134 JB
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
-------
21-Dec-89
Table 1
(Page 3 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/i)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH14B-01
MET253
11/28/88
4 J
109 J
85500
242
24600
88.4
1080 JB
11300
R
16.1 JB
GH14C-01
MET254
11/28/88
511
60 J
7.3 J
26.6 JB
51000
27.7 JB
39 JB
3640 J
20900
R
10.7 JB
GH16A-01
MET268
11/29/88
23.1 JB
140000
4 J
398
33700
50.5
170
2700 J
66200
R
101 B
GH16B-01
MET252
11/29/88
50.3 JB
13.1
139 J
55700
81.1 JB
21100
88.7
1130 J
8180 B
R
1060 B
FRGH16B-99
MET262
11/29/88
27.7 JB
12.9
140 J
55700
75.6 JB
2.4 J
21200
90.5
1140 J
7890 B
R
1340
GH16C-01
MET259
11/29/88
4030
7.5 J
36.8 JB
15200
5.1 J
4600
25.9
3860 J
109 B
3540 J
16700
17.7 J
1020 B
GH17A-01
MET256
11/28/88
42.7 JB
105000
345
35200
60.8
.4
2110 J
196000
R
122 B
GH17B-01
HET257
11/28/88
8.4 J
75.2 J
WOO
78.8 JB
20100
178
.9
1010 JB
8600 B
R
434 B
GH17C-01
MET258
11/28/88
623
4.2 J
134 J
146000
74.9 JB
185
253 JB
3140 J
36100
11.9 J
136 B
GH18B-01
MET261
11/28/88
12.3
118 J
66000
573
25300
50
1620 J
8080 B
R
149 B
GH19A-01
MEW493
12/01/88
27.2 JB
108000
28.1
5.1 JB
143 B
20100
157
5260
51600
168 JB
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
-------
21-Dec-89
Table 1
(Page 4 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH20A-01
MET266
11/29/88
26.9 JB
71.9 J
138000
196 B
29000
197
7300
114000
R
709 B
GH20B-01
MET267
11/29/88
22.4
90.3 J
9090
25 JB
5980
10.3 J
1630 J
31000
R
73.4 B
GH21A-01
MEBG06
12/01/88
34 JB
118
405
104000
10.7 J
5.6 JB
13800
48600
51.9
26.1 J
36200
87200
88.2 JB
GH22A-01
MET264
11/29/88
8.1 J
169 J
113000
357
40400
108
3020 J
63200
R
234 B
GH22B-01
MET265
11/29/88
37.3 JB
36.4 JB
78200
25 JB
692 JB
3160 J
24400
R
186 B
GH23A-01
MET263
11/29/88
10.4
29 JB
14900
22.3 JB
5.8
8280
26.7
6040
113000
R
151 B
GH25A-01
MEU494
12/01/88
35.8 JB
39.4
645
91600
13.8 JB
4730
44900
110
57900
86500
505 JB
GH26A-01
HEU495
12/01/88
57.6 JB
93.6
505
135000
8.4 JB
11000
28100
198
9.6 J
28900
51300
3 J
127 JB
103-01
MET285
11/30/88
31.5 JB
12.9
90.2 J
28400
4.6 JB
62 JB
6
32500
9.7 J
11.3 J
34500
100000
5.3 J
209 JB
105-01
MEU497
12/01/88
43.4 JB
78.8
816
179000
4.5 JB
28500
58500
458
9.9 J
64900
86200
92.7 JB
R002X-01
HEU492
12/01/88
10
138 J
59800
3.1 JB
569
29.9
21300
99.3 B
1460 J
8.6 J
9150 B
915 JB
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
-------
21-Oec-89
Table 1
(Page 5 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
RD08XX-01
MET288
12/01/88
74.6
394
94300
7350
3.4 J
45200
117
18700
73700
1720 J
RD18-01
MET282
11/30/88
27.3 JB
130
55.9 J
103000
4.1 J
5.8 JB
6310
38200
54.2
4890 J
80500
941 JB
RL04-01
MET 290
11/30/88
59.4 JB
1370
215000
11.1
6.7 J
10.9 JB
46200
48900
667 B
53900
77700
3.4 J
51.4 JB
RL06-01
MEU490
11/30/88
80.3 JB
27
1360
132000
6.1 J
25.1 J
8.6 JB
47600
83200
509
48.2
58300
143000
3.9 J
155 JB
RL17-01
MET287
11/30/88
30
304
136000
12.2 JB
16200
32600
358
19900
64500
237 JB
RU07-01
MET283
12/01/88
25.2 JB
65.4
199 J
138000
13600
33500
162
8960
1 J
63200
1050 JB
FRRU07-99
MEU491
12/01/88
30.1 JB
50.7 J
203
139000
13400
2.1 J
33700
166
9330
63700
1420 J
RU12X-01
MEBG01
12/01/88
31.5 JB
49.6
335
139000
6.3 JB
22000
2.2 J
36700
276
31900
70000
1360 J
RU14-01
MEBG04
12/01/88
42.3 JB
52
255
174000
6.5 J
7.4 J
7.8 JB
25200
54700
101
16.6 J
50200
136000
3.4 J
655 JB
RU19-01
MET281
11/30/88
29.1 JB
8.5 J
31.7 JB
456000
6.3 J
5.3 JB
68300
105000
2060
18.8 J
60000
84400
452 JB
GUFB01
MET260
11/28/88
47.6 J
8.6 J
422 J
27.8 J
48.7 J
R
4.8 J
-------
21-Dec-89
Table 1
(Page 6 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM .
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
GUFB02
MET 274
11/30/88
48.6 J
8.3 J
838 J
41.7 J
146 J
1080 J
R
267
GUFB03
MET276
11/30/88
53.2 J
9.8 J
790 J
3.9 J
19.7 J
104 J
1600 J
15.7 J
GUFB04 GUFB05
MEBG07 MEBG10
12/02/88 12/02/88
28.7 J 46.8 J
3.2 J 5.7 J
526 J 391 J
101 J 54.9 J
222 J
1840 J
11.4 J 37.1 J
-------
19-Sep-89
Table 2
(Page 1 of 2)
G & H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
RESIDENTIAL WELLS - ORGANIC RESULTS
SAMPLE: GR01-01 GR01-01RE GR02-01 GR02-01RE GR03-01 GR03-01RE GR04-01 GR06-01 GR10-01
OTR NUMBER: EAL03 EAL03RE EAL06 EAL06RE EAL22 EAL22RE EAL23 EALi>5 EAL02
DATE SAMPLED: 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88
FRGR10-99 GR13-01
EAL01 EAL13
11/28/88 11/28/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 3
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE .5
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 7
2-BUTANONE
2-HEXANONE
ACETONE 6
ACROLEIN
BENZENE .8
CHLOROE THANE .5
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE 25
VINYL CHLORIDE 2
XYLENE (TOTAL)
SEN I -VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
A-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
NOTES:
RE = Reanalyzed by
laboratory
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
TB = Trip blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data
not usable
NA = Not analyzed
J
R
R
JB
R
J
J
(ug/L)
R
R
NA
NA 2
NA
NA 9
NA R
NA R
NA It JB
NA R
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 8
NA
NA
R 2 J
R R
NA
NA 1
NA
NA 5
NA R
NA R
NA A JB
NA R
NA
NA
NA
NA SB
NA 1
NA
NA .9 J
R R
R R
NA
NA .5 J
NA
NA 3
NA R R R
NA R R R
NA 7 JB 5 JB
NA R R R
NA
NA .8 J
NA 1 JB
NA 2 B
NA
NA 2
NA
R
R 1 JB
1 J
R R
R R
4 JB 5 JB
R R
2 B
.7 J
-------
19-Sep-89 Table 2 (Page 2 of 2)
SAMPLE: GR14-01 GR19-01 GR21-01 GR31-01 FRGR31-99 GRFB01 GRFB02 GRTB01 GRTB02
OTR NUMBER: EAL14 EAL19 EALOO EAL10 EAL11 EAL24 EAL07 EAL08 EAL04
DATE SAMPLED: 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/29/88 11/29/88 11/28/88 11/29/88 11/28/88 11/29/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE RRRR RRRRR
2-HEXANONE R R R R R R R R R
ACETONE 6 JB 5 JB 7 JB 6 JB 4 JB 5 JB 4 JB 9 JB 14 JB
ACROLEIN RR RR RRR RR
BENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE .8 J 1 J 1 J
TOLUENE 38 4 B 2B .6 J
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPO
4-N1TROPHENOL
PHENOL 1 JB 1 JB 2 B 2 B 1 JB 2 B
NOTES:
RE = Reanalyzed by
NA NA
NA NA
laboratory
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
TB = Trip blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data
not usable
NA = Not analyzed
-------
(Mage i ol 5)
C & M LAISOFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND I ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS - ORGANIC ANALYSIS
SAMPL E :
OIR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GHOIA-OI
EAL42
11/29/99
CHOIB-OI
EAL43
11/29/86
GHOIC-0!
EALS4
12/02/68
CH02A-OI
EBCI6
12/01/86
a 1026-0 I
EBGI7
12/01/88
CH02C-OI
EBC24
12/02/86
GH03A-OI
EBCIO
12/0 I/O
O104B-OI
EAL52
11/30/86
GFO4C-OI
EAL5I
11/30/86
GH05A-OI
F.AL53
12/02/88
GH06A-OI
EBCI2
12/01/88
CH06B-OI
EBCI3
12/01/88
CH07A-OI
EAL49
11/30/88
CH09C-OI
EBC25
12/02/68
CHIOA-OI
EAL44
11/29/99
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
I. I-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-OICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
1.2-OICHLOIiOPROPANE
2-BUTANQNE
2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON OISULFIOE
CHlOR06ENZfN[
CHLOROE THANE
ETHYLBCMZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICMLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (ug/ll
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-METMYLPHENOl
3.]-OICHLOROeENZIDINE
3-NIIROANILINE
4-CHlOSOANILINl
4-METHYLPHENOL
4-NITDOANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZOIC ACID
BISI2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTVL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
N-N1TROSOOIPHENYLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYRENE
PESTICIDES/PCBS (ug/L I
4.4'-DOD
4. 4'-DOT
2 )B
« I
14
1 B|
2 IB
I I
R
2 IB
60
2 I
12
2 I
2 I
H
2 IB
5
5 I
3 IB
4 I
I IB
I IB
2 ID
I Hi
2 IB
6
I |B
5 IB
3 I
14 B
6 I
2 IB
2 IB
2 IB II JB MB 12 B 4 |B 2 IB
5 I
3 I
NOUS:
F« i Held replicate
FB -- Field blank
re -- Trip blank
B : Blank contamination
] ; Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usuable
D = Diluted
NA = Not analyzed
-------
(Page 2 ut
SAMPLE:
OIK NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
CHIOB-OI
CAL49
CHIOC-OI
EAL46
11/29/96
CHIIB-OI
EBC20
12/01/68
CHI2A-OI
EBCI4
12/01/88
01126-01
EBCI5
12/01/81
GHI3B-OI
EAL58
11/30/88
FRGH13B-99
EBC02
11/30/88
CHUB-OI
EAL27
11/28/88
CHUC-OI
EAL28
11/28/88
GHI6A-01
EAL4I
11/29/88
GHI6B-OI
EAL26
11/29/88
FRGHIbB-99
EAL35
11/29/88
OII6C-OI CHI7A-OI
EAL32 EAL29
11/29/88 H/28/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IUg/LI
I. I-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-OICHLOROETHENE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-BUTANONC
2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON OlSUlfIDC
CKLOROBENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1ETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CULM IDE
XYLENE (TOTAL!
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2-METHYL NAPHTHALENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
}.}-OICHLOROBENZIOINE
3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROANILINE
4-METHYL PHENOL
4-NITROANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZOIC ACID
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLIPHTHAIATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYRENE
PtSIICIDtS/PCBS (ug/l)
4.4'-DOO
4.4'-DDT
J JB
I IB
2 IB
10
g
3 I
3 I
3 I
2 I
24
I I
6 |B
I I
5 IB
I I
3 I
I I
I I
7 I
S B
6 IB
I I
3 IB
9 IB
3 IB
5 I
6 IB
5 JB
2 IB 3 |B 4 IB
2 I
2 IB
3 I
NOTES:
FR = field replicate
FB = field blank
TB = Trip blank
B = Blank contamination
) = Estimated value
R ; Laboratory data not usuable
D -- Diluted
NA = Not analyzed
-------
2i-oec-89 labie 3 (Page 3 ul 51
SAMPLE: QII7B-OI CH17C-01 CHI8B-OI GHI9A-OI OI20A-OI GH20B-OI GH2IA-OI GH22A-OI CH22B-01 GH23A-OI GH25A-OI GFI26A-OI 103-01 105-01 RD02X-OI
OTB NUMBER: EAL30 EAL3I EAL34 E8C07 EAL19 EAL40 EBG22 EAL37 EAL31 EAL36 EBG08 EBC09 SALS') EBCII EBC06
DATE SAMPLED: 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 12/01/88 11/29/88 11/29/88 12/01/88 11/29/88 11/29/88 ll/29/Bfi 12/01/88 12/01/88 11/30/88 12/01/88 12/01/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS lug/LI
I.1-DICHLOROETHANE 2 |
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DlCHLO«OETHeNE 21 I J
1. 2-DICHLOROPIIOPANE
2-BUTANONE RB8R6SRS8BRRRRR
2-HEXANONE
4-«ETHVL-2-PENIA^JONE
ACETONE 5 JB > IB 9 JB > III I IB 1} IB 2 IB
BENZENE 140 D ' 56 10 It
CARBON DISU.FIOE 4 I 3 I 19
CHLOROBENZENE I I 14
CmOHOE THANE 22 5 I 75 2 J
ETHYLBENZENE 9
METHYLENE CHIORIDE 2 IB 3 IB
TE1RACHLOROETHENE
TOIUENE 2 |B I IB I IB
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINVL CML08IDE I I
XVIENE (TOTAL! 940 D 30
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (UQ/II
1.2-DICHlOROeENZENt
3.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 21 I
2-METHYL NAPHTHALENE
J-METHYLPHENOl
3.3-DICHLOK08ENZIDINE * K
3-NITROANILINE > R
4-CHLOROANILINE
4-METHYLPHENOL
4-NITROANILINE >
BENZOIB I ELUORANTHENt
BENZOIC ACID
BISI2-CHLOROETHYLI ETHER 3 I
BISU-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE 2 IB 6 IB 2 JB 18 6 4 IB 5 IB 43 B MB 4 |B 13 B
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 5 I 3 I
FLUORANTHENE
FLUODENE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE J IB 3 B| 3 I 4 I
NAPHIHALENE ^ I
PHENANTHRF.NE
PHENOL 61 5| 21
PYRENE
PESTICIDES/PC8S (ug/LI
» f -000
4.4 -DO1
NOIES:
FR = Field replicale
FB -• Field blank
TB = Tr ip blank
B : Blank contamination
I = Estimated value
R : Laboratory data not usuable
D = Diluted
MA : NO! analyzed
-------
lable 3
(Cage 4 ol 5)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
RD08XX-01
EBCOO
12/01/88
R018-01
EAL57
RL04-OI
EBG03
11/30/88
RL06-OI
EBC04
11/10/88
RL 17-01
EAL60
11/30/88
RW07-01
EAL56
12/01/88
FRRW07-W
EBG05
12/01/88
RWI2X-OI
EBG16
12/01/88
RW14-OI
EBC1V
12/01/88
RWI9-01
EAL55
11/10/88
CWFBOI
EAL33
11/28/98
CWFB02
EAL47
11/10/88
CWFBOI
EAL50
11/10/88
GWFB04
EBC2]
12/02/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (Ug/LI
I. I-DICHLOROETHANE 1 I
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 140 D|
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-BUTANONE R R R II I
2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 770 D
ACETONE 2 IB 4 IB 1 IB 180 D|B
BENZENE 5 2| 180 140 D|
CARBON Dl SUE IDE 43 II 6
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROE THANE 7 |
ETHYLBENZENE 1000 D
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 2 IB 12 B 79 D|B
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE I IB 2 IB 410 DB
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE 18
XYLENE (TOTAL) 36 6800 D
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS lug/I I
1.2-DICHlOROBENZENE
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 130 J
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2 I
2-METHYLPHENOL 45 |
1.3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE R R R R
3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROANIllNE
4-METHYLPHENOL 140
4-NITROANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 2 I
BENZOIC ACID 21 10 I
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYll ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 60 B 2 IB 6 |B
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE 1 I
FLUORENE 2 |
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE 1 I
NAPHTHALENE 14
PHENANTHRENE 5 I
PHENOL 19 |
PYRENE 3 |
PLSIICIOES/PCBS (ug/LI
4.4'-DOD 0.3
4.4'-OOT
4 IB
2 I
13
4 I
2 I
R
4 I
42 |
3 |
R
3 I
4 IB
4 I
I I
I IB
6 I
67 IB
1500
140 |
2000
62 IB
3 I
160 |
8 I
3 IB
8 I
34 B
14
72
3 I
I I
3 I
6
3 I
R
4 IB
3 I
I I
2 I
6 B
I I
3 I
2 I
3 I
2 IB
2 IB
I I
2 IB
53 IB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicdte
FB : Held blank
IB = Tiip blank
B = Blank contamination
I = Estinaled value
R = Laboratory data not usuable
D = Diluted
NA = NO! analyzed
-------
(Page 5 ul 51
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
DA If SAMPLED:
cwFBOj
EBC26
12/02/88
CWIBOI
EAL49
11/29/99
CWTB02
EBG01
11/10/99
C*IB04
EBG2 I
12/01/99
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (Ug/L)
I. I-DICHLOROE THANE
1.2-DICHLOROCTHANE
1.2-OICHLOROETHENE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-BUTANONE
2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISUFIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHI OR OE THANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
IETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS lug/I)
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4-OIMETHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENl
2-METHYL PHENOL
J. J-DICHLOR08ENZIDINE
1-NIIROANILINE
4-CHIOROANILINE
4-MEIHYLPHENOL
4-NITROANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZOIC ACID
BISI2-CHLOROEIHYL) ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYl PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYRENE
PESTICiDES/PCfls (ug/L)
2 |B
I |
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.4'-
4.4'-
NOTES
FR
FB
IB
B
1
R
D
NA
XX) NA NA NA
JDI NA NA NA
Field iepl icale
Field blank
TI ip blank
Blank contamination
Estimated value
Laboratory data not usuable
Diluted
Not analyzed
-------
28-Sep-89
Table 4
(Page 1 of 3)
G & H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE SOIL • ORGANIC RESULTS
SAMPLE: SS01-01
OTR NUMBER: EBG42
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
12/02/88
SS02-01
EBG43
4308E12
12/02/88
SS03-01
EBG44
4308E13
12/02/88
SS04-01
EBG27
SS05-01
EBG28
SS06-01
EBG29
12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88
SS07-01
EBG45
4308E14
12/02/88
FRSS07-99 SS08-01
EBG46
4308E15
12/02/88
EBG30
SS09-01
EBG47
12/02/88 12/02/88
SS10-01
EBG31
4308E16
12/02/88
PESTICIDES/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE
4.4'-DDT
AROCLOR-1254
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULFAN II
GAMMA BHC (LINDANE)
GAMMA CHLORDANE
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
7.4 J
4.9 J
300 J
57 J
27
64
5.7 J
150
D10XINS/FURANS (ug/kg)
HEXA-CDD
HEPTA-CDD
OCTA-CDD
TETRA-CDF
PENTA-CDF
HEXA-CDF
HEPTA-CDF
OCTA-CDF
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
.226
.442 J
.337 J
.063 J
.054
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FR - Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R - Laboratory data not
usable
NA - Not analyzed
[File: TABLE 4.UK1]
-------
28-Sep-89
Table 4
(Page 2 of 3)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
SS11-01
EBG32
4308E17
12/02/88
FRSS11-99
EBG33
12/02/88
SS12-01
EBG48
12/02/88
SS13-01
EBG49
4308E18
12/02/88
SSH-01
E8G50
4308E19
12/02/88
SS15-01
EBG34
4308E20
12/02/88
SS16-01
EBG35
4308E21
12/02/88
FRSS16-99
EBG36
12/02/88
SS17-01
EBG37
4308E22
12/02/88
SS18-01
EBG38
4308E23
12/02/88
SS19-01
EBG39
12/02/88
PESTICIDES/PCBs (ug/kg)
4.4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
AROCLOR-1254
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULFAN II
GAMMA BHC (LINDANE)
GAMMA CHLORDANE
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
DIOXINS/FURANS (ug/kg)
NA - Not analyzed
[File: TABLE 4.UK1]
22 J
HEXA-CDD
HEPTA-COD
OCTA-CDD
TETRA-CDF
PENTA-CDF
HEXA-CDF
HEPTA-CDF
OCTA-CDF
FR - Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R - Laboratory data not
usable
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
.107 J
.636 .199 .081
.490 .035 .029
.282 .023 .030
.046 J
.094
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
.056 J
.849 J
1.697
.092
.277
.242
.150
.400
.105
.146
.017 J
.042
.069
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
28-Sep-89
Table 4
(Page 3 of 3)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
SS20-01
EBG40
SS21-01
EBG41
SS22-01
EBG51
SS23-01
EBG52
SS24-01
EBG53
SS25-01
EBG54
SS26-01
EBG55
12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88
PESTICIDES/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
AROCLOR-1254
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULFAN II
GAMMA BHC (LINDANE)
GAMMA CHLORDANE
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
DIOXINS/FURANS (ug/kg)
380
NA - Not analyzed
[File: TABLE 4.UK1]
1600 J
62 J
3.7 J
HEXA-CDD
HEPTA-CDD
OCTA-CDD
TETRA-COF
PENTA-CDF
HEXA-CDF
HEPTA-CDF
OCTA-CDF
FR - Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R - Laboratory data not
usable
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 1 of 24)
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH01A-02
OTR NUMBER: EDF88
ITR NUMBER: MEACB8
DATE SAMPLED: 7-27-89
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
ug/l
33.2
223
U5000
7730
38900
166
28000
53600
1720
GH-GUGH01B-02 GH-GWGH02A-02 GH-GUGH02B-02 GH-GUGH03B-02 GH-GWGH03B-02RE GH-GUGH03C-02 GH-GUGH08B-02 GH-GUGH09A-02
EDA61 EDF81 EDF82 EDA49 EDA49 RE EDA52 EDF80 EDA46
MEAA61 MEAC81 MEAC82 MEAA49 NA HEAA52 MEAC80 MEAA46
7-25-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-24-89 7-24-69 7-24-89 7-26-89 7-24-89
ug/l
15.9
232
75800
291 B
15 J
25400
40.6
3010 J
14300
1090
ug/l
52.6 J
14
276
99200
3470
53600
48.9
14.7 JB
17200
125000
496
ug/l
22.9
396
113000
1590
43400
88.7
8.5 JB
45800
105000
318
ug/l
14.6
649
.8 JB
121000
14.6 JB
3930
66300
72.8
18.6 JB
21100
85300
21.9 B
ug/l
MA
HA
HA
IIA
HA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ug/l
953
12.9
128 J
.6 JB
21800
34.4 B
904
9080
25.9
6.5 JB
3390 J
37800
10.4 JB
ug/l
2.9 J
130 J
102000
103 B
29800
188
10.2 JB
4380 J
90800
111
ug/l
32.4
296
86200
36
161
38000
546
13.2
36500
74600
17.4
B
B
JB
JB
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
ChIorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
810 J
720
2 J
2 JB
5 B
28
1 JB
6 JB
330 J
250
1 JB
2 J
1 JB
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 2 of 24)
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH01A-02 GH-GUGH01B-02 GH-GUGH02A-02 GH-GUGH02B-02 GH-GUGH03B-02 GH-GWGH03B-02RE GH-GUGH03C-02 GH-GUGH08B-02 GH-GUGH09A-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - D i ch I orobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb] f luroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
EDF88 EDA61 EDF81 EDF82 EDA49
MEAC88 MEAA61 MEAC81 MEAC82 MEAA49
7-27-89 7-25-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-24-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l
3 J
3 J 11 3 J
12 B 19 B 27 B 9 JB
2 J 3 J
•
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
EDA49 RE
NA
7-24-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDA52 EDF80 EDA46
MEAAS2 MEAC80 MEAA46
7-24-89 7-26-89 7-24-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l
3 J
4 J
2 JB
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 3 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH09B-02 GH-GUGH118-02 GH-GUGH12A-02 GH-GUGH12B-02 GH-GUGH14A-02 GH-GUGH14C-02 GH-GUGH1SB-02 GH-GUGH15C-02 GH-GUGH16B-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA47 EDF61 EDF76 EDF75 EDF79 EDF62 EDA62 EDA63 EDF68
ITR NUMBER: MEAA47 MEAC61 MEAC76 HEAC75 MEAC79 MEAC62 MEAA62 MEAA63 MEAC68
DATE SAMPLED: 7-24-89 7-27-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-27-89
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1 - Tri ch loroethane
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Ch loroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
ug/l
25
278
80800
629
47700
426
10.4 JB
28900
76800
16.8 JB
6 B
ug/l ug/l
2.4 J 28.8
298 J 241
89700 133000
2830 J 10700
30000 38700
46.4 J 218
7180 16900
49300 59800
5.5 JB 18.9 JB
1 J
98
15 J
8 B
20 B
1 JB 1 JB
55
2 JB
ug/l ug/l ug/l
185 J 333
3 J 9 J
203 75.4 J 17.3 JEl
97000 80900 24200
8.7 JB
63.1 JB 281 B
25500 15500 317 JB
116 20.8
3880 J 1780 J 6060
45200 319000 30100
5.6 JB 18.7 JB 4.9 JI3
-- R
4 J
13 B 2 JB
27 B
ug/l
3 J
100 J
.6 JB
79000
9.4 JB
132 B
23100
65.1
1580 J
24900
29.3 B
ug/l
56.1 J
10.3
38.4 JB
16300
84.2 JB
10800
8.4 JB
5.8 JB
17000
4 J
81800
57.3
ug/l
12.2
135 J
63600
43.4 JB
1.2 J
20200
85.1 J
1740 J
9350 B
1360 J
16 B
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 4 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GWGH09B-02
EOA47
MEAA47
7-24-89
GH-GWGH11B-02
EDF61
MEAC61
7-27-89
GH-GWGH12A-02
EDF76
MEAC76
7-26-89
GH-GWGH12B-02
EDF75
MEAC75
7-26-89
GH-GWGHHA-02
EDF79
MEAC79
7-26-89
GH-GUGHUC-02
EDF62
MEAC62
7-27-89
GH-GWGH15B-02
EDA62
MEAA62
7-25-89
GH-GUGH15C-02
EDA63
MEAA63
7-25-89
GH-GUGH16B-02
EDF68
MEAC68
7-27-89
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo[b]fIuroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodi phenyIamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
5 JB
13 B
7 JB
10 B
12 B
59 B
2 J
5 JB
2 JB
7 J
2 J
1.8
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample,
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
results reported in mg/kg
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 5 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 - D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chi oroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH16C-02 GH-GUGH17A-02 GH-GUGH17B-02 GH-FRGUGH17B-02 GH-GWGH18B-02 GH-GUGH19A-02 GH-GUGH19B-02 GH-GUGH24A-02 GH-GUGH26A-02
EDF67 EDA60 EDA58 EDA59 EDF71 EDF65 EDA54 EDF54 EDF89
MEAC67 MEAA60 MEAAS8 MEAA59 MEAC71 MEAC6S MEAA54 MEAC54 MEAC89
7-27-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-27-89 7-27-89 7-25-89 7-28-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l
724 37.5 J
11.8 11.7 11.1 10.8 J
72.5 J 28.4 JB 83.1 J 88.1 J 134 J 55 J
.6 JB .6 JB .8 JB .5 JB
17200 57700 61500 64000 77600 126000
170
1250 J 38.7 JB 281 B 51.5 JB 664 J
5 1.9 J
6780 17400 19700 20400 25500 26700
26.7 J 46.6 169 176 54.4 J 172 J
6.3 JB
3790 J 1940 J 1150 JB 993 JB 1700 J 4910 J
23700 153000 8180 B 7780 B 8410 B 45200
130 J 188 302 J 720 J 225 J 42 JB
3 J
17 B 1 JB 2 JB 3 JB 13 B
SB 2: JB
14 J
3 JB
ug/l ug/l
341 46.6 JB
30 JB
46.5
76.9 J 589
.6 JB
76500 130000
9.2 J
8.3 JB
9.6 JB
1020 17600
2.5 J
22200 35200
185 102
12.3 JB 11.2 JB
3270 J 35700
22900 80100
5.6 J
40.3 B 69.2 B
-- R
560
530
690 B
1900 B
3500
ug/l
170
626
161000
13900
29200
340
32500
47300
41
3
2
--
210
4
37
4
1
2
B
J
J
R
J
J
JB
JB
JB
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 6 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUGH16C-02
EDF67
MEAC67
7-27-89
GH-GWGH17A-02
EOA60
MEAA60
7-25-89
GH-GUGH17B-02
EDA58
MEAAS8
7-25-89
GH-FRGWGH17B-02
EDA59
MEAA59
7-25-89
GH-GUGH18B-02
EDF71
MEAC71
7-27-89
GH-GWGH19A-02
EDF65
MEAC65
7-27-89
GH-GUGH19B-02
EDA54
MEAA54
7-25-89
GH-GWGH24A-02
EDF54
MEAC54
7-28-89
GH-GUGH26A-02
EDF89
MEAC89
7-27-89
ug/l
ug/l
ug/t
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
1,2-D i chIorobenzene
1,4-D i chIorobenzene
2.4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzolb]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
30 B
2 J
27 B
1 J
3 JB
3 JB
34 J
6 J
7 J
160 J
42
69
2 JB
3 J
2 J
47
9 J
10
11
11 B
7 J
1 JB
7 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
8 = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in ing/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 7 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH27A-02 GH-GWGH28A-02 GH-GUGH28B-02 GH-GUGH29A-02 GH-GUGH29B-02 GH-GUGH29C-02 GH-GUGH30A-02 GH-FRGWGH30A-02 GH-GUGH30B-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA57 EDA64 EDA67 EOA77 EDA78 EDA76 EDA74 EDA75 EDA73
ITR NUMBER: MEAA57 MEAA64 MEAA67 MEAA77 MEAA78 MEAA76 MEAA74 MEAA75 HEAA73
DATE SAMPLED: 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
ug/l
73.2 J
26.3 JB
111000
284 B
23700
444
13.6 JB
3580 J
48000
10.5 JB
ug/l
28.5 JB
.5 JB
83900
32.8
72.7 JB
19500
34.8
10 JB
14100
63200
25.8 B
ug/l
2.3 J
121 J
78200
157 B
19500
100
5.8 JB
1460 J
22200
17.5 JB
ug/l
38.9 J
9.6 J
127 J
95300
540
2.2 J
19700
675
12.1 JB
6810
69000
9.2 JB
ug/l
159
2.7
112
.7
88800
1310
3
23600
358
11.6
4430
25200
27.3
J
J
J
JB
J
JB
J
B
ug/l
2930
15.2
666
.9 JB
227000
6 J
9.4 J
6.3 JB
6930
2.2 J
23100
1250
16.9 Jll
3110 J
36200
8.5 J
316
ug/l
654 J
44.5
856
.9 JB
188000
5.7 J
30.6 JB
9320
12.8 J
73000
723 J
26.5 JB
41100
103000
80.6
ug/l
269 J
54.8
1030
.7 JB
153000
6.8 J
4.9 J
•^
7160
69600
292 J
21.7 JB
44500
111000
15.6 JB
ug/l
38.2
39.6
1470
155000
10200
76500
102
23.8
45000
124000
18.5
J
JB
JB
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
2 JB
3 JB
7 J
1 JB
8 B
5 B
6 J
2 JB
4 JB
1 JB
2 JB
9 J
16
11 B
7 B
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 8 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH27A-02 GH-GUGH28A-02 GH-GWGH28B-02 GH-GUGH29A-02 GH-GUGH29B-02 GH-GUGH29C-02 GH-GUGH30A-02 GH-FRGUGH30A-02 GH-GUGH30B-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
EDAS7
MEAAS7
7-25-89
ug/l
EDAM
MEAA64
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA67
MEAA67
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA77
MEAA77
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA78
MEAA78
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA76
MEAA76
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA74
MEAA74
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA75
MEAA75
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA73
MEAA73
7-25-89
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-D i chIorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo[b]fIuroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
8 JB
9 J
10
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 9 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH31A-02 GH-FRGUGH31A-02 GH-GUGH31B-02 GH-GUGH31C-02 GH-GUGH32A-02 GH-GWGH33A-02 GH-FRGUGH33A-02 GH-GUGH33B-02 GH-GUGH34A-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA80 EDA81 EOA82 EOA83 EOF77 EDIF93 EDF94 EDF9S EDA48
ITR NUMBER: MEAA80 MEAA81 MEAA82 MEAA83 MEAC77 MEAC93 MEAC94 MEAC9S MEAA48
DATE SAMPLED: 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89 7-27-89 7-27-89 7-24-89
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichl oroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chi oroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
ug/l
69.3 J
28.6
535
.9 JB
141000
9 J
15900
2.6 J
103000
209
24.9 JB
37200
129000
44.6 B
6 J
1 J
2 JB
ug/l
55.2 J
27.1
526
.7 JB
143000
9.4 J
15800
102000
232
25.9 JB
36200
4.1 J
129000
20.9 B
5
1 JB
ug/l
45 J
24.2
1360
.7 JB
173000
5.3 J
9750
105000
160
23.3 JB
63200
166000
59.3
26
1 JB
ug/l
544
5.6 J
58.6 J
13000 B
663
3000 JB
12.4 JB
15400
55400
14.6 JB
2 J
2 JB
ug/l
42.3 J
52.5
550
.5 JB
130000
18400
65600
298
15.3 JB
54200
141000
45.6 B
-- R
11
1 JB
u<
45.7
38
422
112000
8.9
11300
51500
64.3
27.2
56100
118000
15.2
--
17
12
2«
460
J/l
J
J
J
J
J
JB
JB
R
J
JB
B
B
ug/l
39.2 J
39.6
401 J
103000
10.3 J
10000 J
47000
63.7 J
20.4 JB
50500
108000
17.3 JB
-- R
17 J
13 JB
33 B
450 B
ug/l
31.2 J
307
977 J
135000
12800 J
68200
47.4 J
17 JB
34200
112000
25.9 JB
-- R
11
10 B
1 JB
62 B
u<
20.3
176
.6
112000
1480
41200
1150
14.5
38100
62900
45.8
1
5
3/1
J
JB
JB
B
JB
B
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 10 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUGH31A-02
EDA80
MEAA80
7-26-89
GH-FRGUGH31A-02
EDA81
MEAA81
7-26-89
GH-GUGH31B-02
EDA82
MEAA82
7-26-89
GH-GWGH31C-02
EDA83
MEAA83
7-26-89
GH-GUGH32A-02
EDF77
MEAC77
7-26-89
GH-GUGH33A-02
EDF93
MEAC93
7-27-89
GH-FRGUGH33A-02
EDF94
MEAC94
7-27-89
GH-GUGH33B-02
EDF9S
MEAC95
7-27-89
GH-GWGH34A-02
EDA48
MEAA48
7-24-89
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
1,2-D i chIorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N - N i t rosod i pheny I am i ne
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
4 J
14 B
9 JB
8 JB
2 J
13 B
10 JB
7 J
2 JB
2 J
2 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in nog/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 11 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1 , 2 -D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chtorobenzene
Chi oroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trich I oroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH34B-02 GH-GUGH35A-02 GH-GUGH35B-02 GH-GUGH36A-02 GH-CWGH36B-02 GH-GWGH37A-02 GH-GUGH38A-02 GH-GUGH38A-02 DL GH-GUGH39A-02
EDAS1 EDF55 EDF56 EDA55 EDA56 EDA68 EDAB6 EDA86 DL EDF70
MEAA51 MEAC55 MEAC56 MEAA55 MEAAS6 MEAA68 MEAA86 NA MEAC70
7-24-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l
38.9 JB
26.6 JB
12.5 71.7
132 J 920
79100 111000
7.6 JB
1050 14000
22700 34000
79.4 123
937 JB 37800
4570 JB 80700
5.8 J
13.2 JB 19.2 JB
-- R
26
17
12 JB
13 B
ug/l ug/l
6010
5 J 15.7
113 J 269
124000 149000
45.4
27.5 J
74.9 B
6240 23800
34
39600 34200
46.2 1200
50.1
3150 J 8180
56700 448000
30 J
12.7 JB 176
3 J
-- R
12 B
22
ug/l ug/l
308
6.7 J 24.4
390 1040
.5 JB
174000 142000
5.7 J
2840 1050
47900 35700
143 467
25.9 JB
2430 J 19600
202000 85400
13.3 JB 25.5 B
4 J
2 J
6 J
4 i!J
ug/l
39.6 J
35.7
1070
155000
5.3 J
8800
49800
198
13 JB
46000
108000
158
1800 JB
1300
2900
1800 B
15000 B
15000 B
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ug/l
32.4
61
385
96200
4800
37000
332
33200
66000
17.9
16
J
J
J
J
JB
B
-------
08-Mar-90 TABLE 5 (Page 12 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH34B-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA51
ITR NUMBER: MEAAS1
DATE SAMPLED: 7-24-89
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - D i ch I orobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methy I phenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo [b] f I uroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di -n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
NOTES:
GH-GUGH35A-02 GH-GUGH35B-02 GH-GUGH36A-02 GH-GUGH36B-02 GH-GUGH37A-02
EDF55 EDF56 EDA55 EDA56 EDA68
MEACSS MEAC56 MEAA55 MEAAS6 NEAA68
7-28-89 7-28-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l
7 JB 10 B
2 J
3 J
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in dig/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE - Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
GH-GUGH38A-02
EDA86
MEAA86
7-26-89
ug/l
120
67
47
330 J
120 B
100
54
400 J
9 J
22
9.5 D
GH-GUGH38A-02 DL GH-GUGH39A-02
EDA86 DL EDF70
NA MEAC70
7-26-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l
69 DJ
36 DJ
260 D
96 DJB 1 JB
72 DJ
42 DJ
380 D
12 DJ
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 13 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH40A-02 GH-FRGWGH40A-02 GH-GWGH40B-02 GH-GUGH41B-02 GH-GUGH42B-02 GH-FRGWGH42B-02 GH-GUGH43A-02 GH-GUGH43B-02 GH-GUGH44A-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA84 EDAB5 EDA87 EOF66 EOF52 EDF53 EOA45 EDA44 EDA43
ITR NUMBER: MEAA84 MEAA85 MEAA87 MEAC66 MEACS2 MHAC53 MEAA45 MEAA43 MEAA42
DATE SAMPLED: 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89 7-28-89 7-2B-89 7-24-89 7-24-89 7-24-89
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
ug/l
45.4 J
29.4
382
95300
1790
59400
157
15.3 JB
50300
94400
10.2 JB
23
ug/l
33.1 J
31.9
345
.5 JB
85500
1470
55000
132
13 JB
47500
87800
6.8 JB
8 JB
15
ug/l
24.7
1400
92100
2650
64100
20.1
8.5 JB
54500
94700
5.8 JB
ug/l
110
610 J
111000
10200 J
49800
42.7 J
9.6 JB
20500
77900
96.9 J
42 J
ug/l
46.6 JB
24.8
365
1.1 JB
98000
2070
29500
51.7
10.8 JB
2840 J
31200
22.7 B
-- R
ug/l
25.5
371
.56 JB
99700
2090
30000
51.4
2050 J
30700
13,9 JB
-- R
ug/l
89 J
4.3 J
86000
93.2 JB
26600
473
32.3 J
18600
33300
84.3
ug/l
33 J
16.8
351
133000
2900
41900
102
26.8 JB
2590 J
111000
52.8
3 J
US
35.6
340
94800
4.2
7140
45400
135
16.8
45000
87100
28.9
56
17
>/l
J
JB
B
J
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
7 B
13 B
4 JB
1 JB
3 JB
2 JB
26
2 JB
-------
08-Har-90
TABLE 5
(Page U of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH40A-02 GH-FRGWGH40A-02 GH-GUGH40B-02 GH-GUGH41B-02 GH-GUGH42B-02 GH-FRGWGH42B-02 GH-GUGH43A-02 GH-GUGH43B-02 GH-GUGH44A-02
OTR NUMBER: EOA84 EDA85 EDA87 EOF66 EOF52 EOF53 EDA45 EDA44 EDA43
ITR NUMBER: MEAA84 MEAA85 MEAA87 MEAC66 MEAC52 MEAC53 MEAA45 MEAA43 MEAA42
DATE SAMPLED: 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-24-89 7-24-89 7-24-89
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-D i chIorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthatate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthaiate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
9 J
3 JB
13
2 JB
3 J
2 JB
3 JB
7 J
3 J
2 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not.usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
-------
08-Har-90
TABLE 5
(Page 15 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH45A-02 GH-GUI02-02* GH-GWI02-02*
OTR NUMBER: EDA53 EDF49 EDF50 (oil)
ITR NUMBER: MEAA53 MEAC49 MEAC50
DATE SAMPLED: 7-25-89 7-28-89 7-28-89
WML W1L
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
ug/l
693
8.2 J
174 J
.8 JB
92400
10.8
24 JB
7590
46900
486
15.9 JB
26600
67300
59.2
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
GH-GU105-02 GH-GURD08XX-02 GH-GURD18-02 GH-GURD24-02 GH-FRGURD24-02 GH-GURL04-02
EDF90 EDF78 EDF84 EDF96 EDF97 EDF98
MEAC90 MEAC78 MEAC84 MEAC96 MEAC97 MEAC98
7-27-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89 7-27-89 7-27-89
ug/l
35 J
69.7
498
149000
18300
58600
438
15.3 JB
81400
160000
44.6 B
ug/l
71.4
381
.5 JB
89400
5670
41400
91.7
16200
67600
1730
ug/l
111
65.5 J
123000
6530
42200
54.2
5070
88200
500
ug/l
11.5
170 J
65400
21400
43.2 J
15.3 JB
3910 J
33700
31 JB
ug/l
12
172 J
64700
21400
41.3 J
15.8 JB
3480 J
33900
14.8 JB
ug/l
66
1330
214000
6.2
6.2
39400
48600
604
6.8
50300
67300
58.5
J
J
J
J
J
J
JB
J
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-D i chIoroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chtoroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
2.5 JB
5 B
2.5 JB
2.5 JB
21
15
5 B
2 J
2 JB
3 JB
33
3 JB
110
15 B
1 J
34
5 B
4 JB
130
7 J
150
1 JB
17 B
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 16 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH45A-02 GH-GUI 02-02* GH-GUI02-02* GH-GUI05-02 GH-GURD08XX-02 GH-GURD18-02 GH-GWRD24-02 GH-FRGURD24-02 GH-GURL04-02
OTR NUMBER: EDAS3 EOF49 EDF50 (oil) EOF90 EDF78 EDF84 EDF96 EDF97 EDF98
ITR NUMBER: HEAAS3 MEAC49 MEACSO MEAC90 MEAC78 MEAC84 MEAC96 MEAC97 MEAC98
DATE SAMPLED:
1 , 2-0 i ch I orobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2, 4 -Dime thy I phenol
2-Methylnapthatene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Hethylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb] f luroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl pnthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di -n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
7-25-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-27-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89
WML UIL
ug/l mg/kg mg/kg ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l
1 J
5 JB 3 JB 6 JB 23 B
3 J
1 JB 1 J
2 J
10
22 3 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
UIL = Water immiscible liquid
7-27-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l
3
2
1
2
25 B 8
1 J
2
3
1 J
1
2
3
18
4
9
2
J
J
J
J
JB
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
WML = Water miscible liquid
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 17 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GURL06-02 GH-GURL17-02 GH-GWRL29-02 GH-GURU05-02* GH-GURUOS-02* GH-FRGURW05-02* GH-FRGURU05-02A* GH-FRGURU05-02B* GH-GURU10-02
EDF99 EDF85 EDF86 EDF44 EDF48 (oil) EDF46 EDF47A (oil) EDF47B (oil) EDF57
MEAC99 MEAC8S MEAC86 MEAC44 MEAC48 HEAC46 MEAC47A MEAC47B MEAC57
7-27-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89
UML UIL WML UIL WML
ug/l
169 J
32.7
2240 J
.5 JB
189000
8.3 J
54.4
53300 J
3.1 J
119000
797 J
109
51700
141000
6.5 J
148 J
-- R
130
170
100 B
49 JB
1300
ug/l
41.1
392
147000
13700
33800
376
23000
73500
175
-- R
24 J
2 JB
ug/l
65.4
9.8
694
.5
198000
5.9
17
62500
83400
268
96.3
49600
176000
95.2
200
130
6
6
12
29
8
28
J
J
JB
J
J
J
B
J
B
B
B
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
-- R
2.5 JB
4 B
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
-- R
20 JB
14 J
27 JB
13 J
70
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR:
NR:
NR
NR
NR
NR
NFI
NR
Nit
NR
Nit
NR
Nit
-- K
2.5 JB
5 B
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
-- R
25 B
12 JB
14 J
53
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ug/l
133
27.3
3
5990
1.1
250000
13.6
21.2
131000
3.1
39300
1710
56.9
83100
124000
13.5
307
370
8400
--
870
580
230
410
590
3200
1700
1200
2900
JB
JB
J
JB
JB
J
J
J
R
B
JB
J
J
B
B
B
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 18 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWRL06-02
OTR NUMBER: EDF99
ITR NUMBER: HEAC99
DATE SAMPLED: 7-27-89
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - D i ch I orobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo [b] f I uroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N - N i t rosod i pheny I ami ne
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
ug/l
37
1 J
5 J
180 J
78 B
2 J
44
9 J
.93 J
NOTES:
GH-GURL17-02 GH-GURL29-02 GH-GURW05-02* GH-GURU05-02* GH-FRGWRU05-02* GH-FRGURU05-02A* GH-FRGURU05-02B* GH-GURU10-02
EDF85 EDF86 EDF44 EDF48 (oil) EDF46 EDF47A (oil) EDF47B (oil) EOF57
MEAC85 MEAC86 MEAC44 MEAC48 MEAC46 MEAC47A MEAC47B MEAC57
7-26-89 7-26-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89
WML UIL WML UIL WML
ug/l ug/l mg/kg mg/kg Dig/kg mg/kg ing/kg ug/l
120
67
52
360 J
140 14 B
100
54
5 J
9 J
24
FR = Field replicate
358
50
42
12
16
33
105
71
16
43
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
273 J 20 J
800
720 J
17 JB
27 J
12 J
15 J
33 J
101 J 160
20 J
70 J
18 J
43 J
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
UIL = Water immiscible liquid
WML = Water miscible liquid
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 19 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
GH-GURW11-02A*
EDF51A (oil)
MEAC51A
7-28-89
UIL
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
GH-GURU11-02B* GH-GURU14-02 GH-GURWU-02ROL GH-GURU21-02 GH-GURU22-02 GH-GURU23-02 GH-GURU24-02 GH-GURU24-02 DL
EDF51B (oil)
MEAC51B
7-28-89
WML
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
EDA79
MEAA79
7-26-89
U9/1
115 J
51.8
264
181000
5.7 J
25200
54300
110
15.9 JB
45200
107000
1160
EDA79 OL
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF58
MEAC58
7-28-89
ug/l
115 JB
51.7
268
.56 JB
92900
13.7 JB
7300
1.7 J
28200
119
34.5 J
30700
89000
71.3 B
EOF 91
MEAC91
7-27-89
u
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 20 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWRW11-02A* GH-GWRU11-02B* GH-GURU14-02 GH-GURU14-02RDL GH-GURU21-02 GH-GURU22-02 GH-GURU23-02 GH-GURU24-02 GH-GURU24-02 DL
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzolb] f iuroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylph thai ate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
EDF51A (oil) EDF51B (oil) EDA79
MEAC51A MEAC51B MEAA79
7-28-89 7-28-89 7-26-89
UIL WML
mg/kg tng/kg ug/l
6 J
78
497 J 11
12 J
363
2 J
702
19 J
1281 110
8 J
49 J
14
189 J 21 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample,
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
WIL = Water immiscible liquid
WML = Water miscible liquid
EDA79 DL EDF58
NA HEAC58
7-26-89 7-28-89
ug/l ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 10 B
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 3 J
NA
NA
results reported in mg/kg
EDF91 EDF59 EDF92
MEAC91 MEACS9 MEAC92
7-27-89 7-28-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l
6 J
8 J 130
4 J
14
7 J
25 B 24 B 67 B
4 J 3 J
3 J 9 J
4 JB
34 480 J
4 J
6 J
1.5 J
EDF92 DL
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
94 D
73 DB
8 DJ
12 DJB
510 D
NA
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 21 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWRU30-02 GH-FRGURU30-02 GH-GUFB05-02 GH-GUFB06-02 GH-GUFB07-02 GH-GUFB08-02 GH-GUFB09-02 GH-GUFB10-02 GH-GUFB11-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA65 EDA66 EOA50 EOA69 EDA70 EOF83 EDF87 EDF69 EOF72
ITR NUMBER: MEAA65 MEAA66 MEAA50 MEAA69 NEAA70 MEAC83 MEAC87 MEAC69 MEAC72
DATE SAMPLED: 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-24-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89 7-27-89
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/l
41.9 J
33 JB
113000
61.2 JB
26600
13.5 JB
1370 J
80200
9.6 JB
ug/l
31.6 JB
115000
61.2 JB
27300
12.9 JB
1330 J
82400
7.3 JB
ug/l ug/l ug/l
6.6 J
156 J 199 J 3160 J
6.7 JB
22.5 JB 42.1 JB 45.9 JB
859 J
5.8 J
1920 J
5.6 JB 9.2 JB 2.1 JB
2 J
ug/ 1 ug/ 1
.5 JB
454 J 394 J
15.8 J
67.2 J
381 JB 165 JB
238 J
3.4 J 1.8 J
ug/l ug/l
8.9 J 8.8 J
324 J 193 J
11.9 J
3.8 JB 7.1 JB
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
5 B
4 JB
3 JB
2 J
3 BJ
2 J
4 BJ
4 J
3 JB
1 J
-- R
8 J
2 J
36
20
21 B
14 B
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 22 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GURU30-02
EDA65
MEAA65
7-25-89
GH-FRGURU30-02
EOA66
MEAA66
7-25-89
GH-GWFB05-02
EDA50
MEAA50
7-24-89
GH-GUFB06-02
EDA69
MEAA69
7-25-89
GH-GUFB07-02
EDA70
MEAA70
7-25-89
GH-GUFB08-02
EDF83
MEAC83
7-26-89
GH-GUFB09-02
EOF87
MEAC87
7-26-89
GH-GUFB10-02
EOF69
MEAC69
7-27-89
GH-GUFB11-02
EOF72
MEAC72
7-27-89
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo[b]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Oiethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylanrine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
3 JB
2 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample,
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
results reported in ing/kg
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 23 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUFB12-02 GH-GUTB01-02 GH-GUTB02-02 GH-GUTB03-02 GH-GUTB04-02 GH-GWTB05-02 GH-GUTB06-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
EDF60
MEAC60
7-28-89
ug/l
3 J
268 J
36.1 JB
76.4 J
3 JB
526 JB
EDA71
NA
7-25-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDA72
NA
7-25-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF73
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF74
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF63
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF64
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chioroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
3 J
3 J
1 J
1 BJ
4 J
16 B
23 B
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
(Page 24 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUFB12-02 GH-GUTB01-02 GH-GUTB02-02 GH-GUTB03-02 GH-GWTB04-02 GH-GUTB05-02 GH-GUTB06-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2.4-Dimethylphenol
2-Hethytnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanal ine
4-Methylphenot
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo [b] f I uroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethythexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butytphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
EDF60 EDA71
MEAC60 NA
EDA72
NA
7-28-89 7-25-89 7-25-89
ug/l ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6 J NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF73
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF74
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF63
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF64
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in ing/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
(Page 1 of 6)
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS - CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
SAMPLE :
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUGH01B-02
E19
7-25-89
GH-GUGH02B-02 GH-GUGH03B-02
E42
7-26-89
E07
7-24-89
GH-GUGH03C-02
E03
7-24-89
GH-GWGH08B-02
E41
7-26-89
GH-GUGH09A-02
E0!i
7-24-89
GH-GUGN09B-02
E04
7-24-89
GH-GUGH12B-02
E39
7-26-89
GH-GUGH14A-02
£40
7-26-89
(mg/l)
Oi I and Grease
BOD
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
NA
22
6
.06 J
404
44
262
34 J
1 J
NOTES:
3
75
18
866
6
574
141 J
9.6 J
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
41
14
626
10
625
107 J
8.9 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2
113
58 J
0.18 J
634
12
590
110 J
103
24
1.05 J
673
9
546
88 J
16 J
68
15
0.37 J
702
18
477
133 J
8.4 J
42
3
.48 J
526
67
217
103 J
1.5 J
90
11
.32 J
1134
60
543
314 J
1.8
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
(Page 2 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH15B-02 GH-GUGH15C-02 GH-GUGH17A-02 GH-GUGH17B-02 GH-FRGUGH17B-02 GH-GUGH19A-02 GH-GUGH19B-02 GH-GUGH27A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E20
7-25-89
E21
7-25-89
E18 E16
7-25-89 7-25-89
E17 E50
7-25-89 7-27-89
E12 £15
7-25-89 • 7-25-89
(dig/ 1)
Oi t and Grease
BOD
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sutfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
2
23
4
.28 J
413
45
194
83 J
6
34
7
.11 J
295
8
221
48 J
.4 J
2 3
9
2
.07 J
670 305
45 39
262 177
204 J 30 J
.5
3
24
6
.1 J
302 696
39 85
176 303
30 J 138 J
.2
7
6 18
5
.11 J .08 J
340 490
58 51
237 286
55 J 81 J
.3
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
(Page 3 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH28A-02 GH-GUGH28B-02 GH-GUGH29A-02 GH-GUGH29B-02 GH-GUGH30A-02 GH-FRGUGHJOA-02 GH-GWGH30B-02 GH-GUGH31A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOD
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkal inity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
E22
7-25-89
27
5
.07 J
497
79
218
82 J
.2
E25 E32
7-25-89 7-25-89
2
14 64
6
.05 J .52 J
385 616
58 74
163 360
61 J 85 J
1.1 J
E33
7-25-89
2
33
5
.23 J
374
50
200
41 J
E30
7-25-89
4
198
38
1.96 J
1048
13
986
127 J
20 J
E31
7-25-89
4
194
:ss
1.97 J
1133
12
974
109 J
21 J
E29
7-25-89
5
103
33
.18 J
1128
9
824
139 J
20 J
E35
7-26-89
82
16
.21 J
1128
24
875
183 J
23 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
(Page 4 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-FRGUGH31A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E36
7-26-89
GH-GUGH31B-02 GH-GWGH33A-02 GH-FRGUGH33A-02 GH-GWGH34A-02 GH-GUGH34B-02 GH-GUGH36A-02 GH-GUGH36B-02
E37
7-26-89
E46
7-27-89
E47 E06
7-27-89 7-24-89
E09 E13 E14
7-24-89 7-25-89 7-25-89
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOO
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
82
18
.45 J
1118
23
844
187 J
21 J
NOTES:
129
27
.79 J
1332
20
1075
242 J
41 J
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
4
NA
NA
.28 J
858
2
638
134 J
28 J
4
70 33
22 11
.3 J .13 J
890 682
2 48
640 443
142 J 92 J
25 J 3.7 J
11 36 10
3 7
1.08 J
340 1780 1582
43 83 77
204 334 206
33 J 719 J 555 J
.15 J .15 J
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
(Page 5 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH37A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E26
7-25-89
GH-GUGH40B-02 GH-GWGH43A-02 GH-GWGH43B-02 GH-GUGH44A-02 GH-GUGH45A-02 GH-GURD24-02 GH-FRGURD24-02
E38
7-26-89
EOS
7-24-89
E02
7-24-89
E01 E11 E48
7-24-89 7-25-89 7-27-89
E49
7-27-89
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOO
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
TOS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
6
5
651
37
.72 J
788
17
654
119 J
5.9 J
NOTES:
4
86
25
.13 J
876
4
703
137 J
25 J
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
2
26
9
.08 J
520
13
378
58 J
5.3 J
3
46
15
.08 J
824
9
524
168 J
.25 J
3
79 19 41
23 5 6
.1 J ,3 J .35 J
806 606 376
5 110 29
587 471 242
129 J 1114 J 27 J
26 J 7.8 J .4 J
3
37
6
.2 J
382
30
239
42 J
.45 J
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
(Page 6 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-GURL17-02 GH-GWRW14-02 GH-GURU24-02 GH-GURU30-02 GH-FRGURU30-02 GH-GUFB05-02 GH-GWFB06-02 GH-GUFB07-02 GH-GWFB08-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E44
7-26-89
E34
7-26-89
E45 E23 E24 E10 E27 E28 E43
7-27-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-24-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-26-89
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOO
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
8
8
H5
18
818
52
521
111 J
16 J
NOTES:
6
143
45
16
13
290 22 22
52 5 4
2.5 J 0.25 J .25 J
1010 1056 656 644
2
238
167 J
26 J
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
10 65 64
935 315 312
102 J 138 J 138 J
32 J
1.7 1.6
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed
-------
03-Jan-90
TABLE 7
G&H LANDFILL
R! PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE WATER
(Page 1 of 1)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-SU01-02* GH-SU02-02* GH-SW03-02* GH-SW04-02* GH-SW05-02* GH-FRSW05-02* GH-SW06-02* GH-FRSU06-02* GH-FBSU03-02*
EDF21 (oil) EDF22 EDF23 (oil) EDF24 EDF25 (oil) EDFJS8 EDF26 EDF27 EDF28
HEAC21 (oil) MEAC22 MEAC23 (oil) MEAC24 MEAC25 (oil) MEAC38 MEAC26 MEAC27 MEAC28
8-01-89 8-01-89 8-01-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-IJ9 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg)
Acetone
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
2-methy I naphthalene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Pent ach I orob i pheny I
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Tetrachlorobiphenyl
Aroclor-1254
2.5 JB 2.5 JB
2.5 JB 2.5 JB
1 J
11 J
567
48 J
48 J
60 J
78 J
60 J
526 J
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
2.5 JB 2.5 JB
2.5 JB 2.5 JB
1 J
7
19 J
1812
582
505
48 J
60 J
73 J
475 J
2.5 JB
2.5 JB
1 J
6 J
19 J
1823
574
501
43 J
77 J
443 J
• 5 JB
3 B 2.5 JB 2.5 JB 2.5 JB
3 JB 2.5 JB 4 JB
2 J
7
17 J
2680
780
487
49
23 J
75 J
23 J
445 J
= High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
Data for inorganic analyte analysis has not been received.
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 8
(Page 1 of 1)
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
LEACHATE WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-LL01-01 GH-FRLL01-01
OTR NUMBER: EDF29 EDF32
ITR NUMBER: MEAC29 MEAC32
DATE SAMPLED: 7-31-89 7-31-89
GH-LL01-02
EDF34
MEAC34
8-01-89
GH-LL02-01 GH-LL02-01 RE
EDF30 EDF30 RE
MEAC30 NA
7-31-89 7-31-89
GH-LL02-02
EDF35
MEAC35
8-01-69
GH-LL03-01
EDF31
MEAC31
7-31-89
GH-LL03-02 GH-FBLL04-01 GH-LLTB06-01
EDF37 EDF33 EDF45
MEAC37 MEAC33 NA
8-01-89 8-01-89 8-01-89
(ug/t)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Si Iver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Acetone
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
A -methyl phenol
Benzole acid
5020 5960
50.5 J 62
32.9 25.5
376 383
.46 JB
166000 176000
16.2 24.8
50.7 50.7
22.6 J 21.2 J
28700 30200
10 B 11.3 B
74300 76600
691 712
33 J 39 J
52400 53400
151000 152000
.4 JB
25.6 J 28.6 J
59.2 B 65.1
4 J 3 J
8 J
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
6630
63.9
33.8
380
.46
169000
22.8
33.8
17.2
30200
13.3
75200
695
32.1
52300
2.5
149000
29.4
62.5
9
5
4
3
JB
J
J
B
J
J
J
JB
J
BJ
J
3960
88.3
39.7
230
265000
18.8
60.8
19.3 J
48200
9 B
140000
811
41.5
66600
199000
.5 JB
13.1 JB
1310
26 JB
21 J
17 J
12 J
15 J
70
170
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
23 JB
22 J
16 J
5 J
15 J
NA
NA
4050
69.9
35.6
218
.68 JB
265000
19.9
43.9 J
17.7 J
47000
9.8 B
140000
786
46.4
67000
.6 JB
200000
13.3 JB
1290
30
19
16
54
110
4170
77.1
21.2
713
.35 JB
1i 59000
38.2
22.3 J
41800
18.4
166000
685
67.2
222000
1.9 JB
454000
.4 JB
11 JB
58.7 B
8
3050 126 JB
81.1
21.4
738
.65 JB
166000 272 JB
27.2
17.2 J
39400
13.5 B 2.7 JB
184000 37.5 J
615
61.7 5.2 J
225000
1.3 JB
470000 825 JB
.7 JB 1.1 JB
9.5 JB
46.4 B 12.1 JB
4 J
5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10 J
4 BJ
NA
NA
R = Laboratory data not usable
TB = Trip blank
RE = Sample reanalyzed
NA = Not analyzed
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 1 of 14)
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TEST PIT - SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease
1 , 1 , 2, 2- Tetrach I oroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobemene
Chloroform
GH-TP01-01
EAG93
MEAA19
E18
5-19-89
(ing/kg)
5130 J
299 J
15.7
8040 J
54.3
12100
9840
40.5
4980 J
146
98200 J
42200 J
4260
1900 J
188
199
433 J
3.8 J
1 JB
1450
21
9670 J
333000 J
(ug/kg)
71000
180000 J
1800000 J
41000
10000 JB
GH-TP01-01 DL
EAG93 DL
NA
NA
5-19-89
(dig/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
320000 JBD
220000 JBD
GH-TP02-01 GH-TP02-01 DL
EAG76 EAG76 DL
MEAA02 NA
E04 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
< ing/ kg)
3390
0.79
5
30.4
0.51
65100
14.4
2.1
68.5
6790
33.7
8950
161
12.1
498
1.9
113
12.6
91.3
10200
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
B
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
20000
4900
470
2200
380
J
JB
J
B
J
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
4400 JBD
23000 DB
GH-TP02-02 GH-TP02-02 DL
EAG77 EAG77 DL
MEAA03 NA
E05 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
(mg/kg)
4540 J
-- R
4.8
71.4 J
0.88
50400
13.6
2.5 J
35.8 J
10700 J
93;2 J
9260
225 J
16.6
647 J
1.1 JB
156 J
12.9
480 J
2660 J
(ug/kg)
43000 J
19000 J
8500
5600 JB
810
390 J
2300 B
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
40000 D
3700 JBD
22000 DB
GH-TP04-01
NA
NA
E01
5-15-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6020 J
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP04-02
EAG74
MEAAOO
E02
5-15-89
(mg/kg)
7290
19.3
5.6
879
1.4
56700
26.9
7.4
77.8
19800
143
9540
618
27.3
1490
.39
299
24.3
453
21300
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
22000
4000
530
2100
J
J
B
GH-TP05-01
EAG85
MEAA11
EOS
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
2980 J
.92 J
3.4
95.6 J
1.1
79300
36
3.1 J
43.6 J
10300 J
205 J
15900
276 J
22.6
341 J
111 J
11.8
516 J
35600 J
(ug/kg)
17000 JB
8500
12000 B
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 2 of 14)
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE ill ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TEST PIT - SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichlocoethene
Xylene (total)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methy (naphthalene
2-Hethylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl .phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [1 , 2 , 3 - cd] pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
GH-TP01-01
EAG93
MEAA19
E18
5-19-89
(ug/kg)
3400000 J
48000 B
SOOOOO J
7000000 J
2200000 J
7900000 J
180000
1300000 JB
160000 B
16000 JB
51000 JB
17000 J
23000 J
530000
27000 J
60000
15000 JB
NOTES:
GH-TP01-01 DL GH-TP02-01
EAG93 DL EAG76
NA MEAA02
NA E04
5-19-89 5-16-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
6300000 DJ 140000 J
950 B
930000 D
15000000 DJ 170000 J
3100000 D
19000000 DJ 280000 J
180000 JD
160 J
1500000 DB 120 JB
170000 B
580 BJ
55000 JBD
17000 JD 37 J
570000 D 84 J
26000 JD
80000 JD 150 J
15000 JBD 59 JB
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
GH-TP02-01 DL
EAG76 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
110000 D
200000 D
310000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DL
D
RE
NA
GH-TP02-02 GH-TP02-02 DL
EAG77
MEAA03
EOS
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
120000 J
3600 B
1000
170000 J
110000 J
230000 J
110000 J
200000 J
49000 JB
82000 J
25000 JB
47000 JB
95000 J
5900 J
42000 J
= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
EAG77 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
110000 D
12000 JBD
230000 D
100000 D
290000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP04-01
NA
NA
E01
5-15-89
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP04-02
EAG74
MEAAOO
E02
5-15-89
(ug/kg)
4800
1300 B
3400
320 J
12000 J
2400 J
8800 JB
1500 J
21000 JB
5900 J
4700 JB
GH-TP05-01
EAG85
MEAA11
E08
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
260000
350000 J
11000
710000 J
10000 J
6900 JB
4800 JB
15000 J
22000 J
3900 JB
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in mg/kg wet
weight
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 3 of U)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oi 1 & Grease
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
GH-TP05-01DL
EAG85 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
150000 JBD
160000 JBD
GH-TP06-01
EAG79
HEAA05
E07
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
2800 J
4 J
5.2
5390 J
2.3
64700
170
6.7 J
893 J
1.5
14400 J
3370 J
19500
211 J
0.21
28.1
373 J
1.5 JB
366 J
11.6
3680 J
100000 J
(ug/kg)
1800000
91000 JB
150000 B
GH-TP06-01 DL
EAG79 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
15000000 D
140000 JBD
250000 JBD
GH-TP07-01
EAG78
MEAA04
E06
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
5660 J
1.1 J
5.8
437 J
42.9
65500
28.4
6.2 J
93 J
32700 J
431 J
12900
405 J
19.8
844
.87 JB
405 J
15
696 J
337 JB
(ug/kg)
1900
13000 J
1600 JB
370 J
1200 B
260 J
GH-TP08-01
EAG75
MEAA01
E03
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
6950
17.4
5.7
843
36.4
28200
82
14.9
284
28500
1020
6570
412
1.1
324
819
3.7
11.5
582
18.4
1970
24600
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
550000
7700
86000
15000
J
JB
B
GH-TP08-01 DL
EAG75 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
690000 0
150000 JBD
190000 JBD
GH-TP09-01 GH-TP09-01 DL
EAG83 EAG83 DL
MEAA09 NA
E09 NA
5-17-89 5-17-89
(mg/kg)
3760
38.7
5.3
6490
42.9
89300
534
32.8
262
9.6
140000
2920
62800
1370
.3
174
210
20
445
30.7
1450
58900
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
93000
7700
42000
90000
120000
480000
19000
32000
11000
J
J
JB
B
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
300000 JBD
150000 JBD
GH-TP10-01
EDA11
MEAA37
E52
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
4240
3.1
23.6 J
96000
8.2
3.8 J
21.4
8980
14.5 J
19700
367 J
7.8 J
382 J
161 J
.59 J
17.9
30.2
143 JB
(ug/kg)
11 B
53 JB
5 JB
-------
06-Har-90
TABLE 9
(Page 4 of U)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery 1 ene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-buty I phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
GH-TP05-01DL
EAG85 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
420000 D
130000 JBD
730000 D
1400000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
GH-TP06-01 GH-TP06-01 DL GH-TP07-01
EAG79 EAG79 DL
MEAA05 NA
E07 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
2600000 2300000 D
130000 JB 170000 JBD
6500000 J 6100000 D
280000 320000 D
7800000 J 7000000 D
NA
NA
41000 J NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
94000 B NA
45000 B NA
NA
NA
8500 JB NA
NA
22000 JB NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
93000 NA
5000 J NA
NA
3300 JB NA
11000 NA
59000 NA
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample.
EAG78
MEAA04
E06
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
1900
880 B
6100
4100
3600
37 J
180 J
240 JB
430 BJ
170 BJ
190 J
110 J
52 JB
DL
D
RE
NA
results
GH-TP08-01 GH-TP08-01 DL
EAG75 EAG75 DL
MEAA01 NA
E03 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
1200000 J 1400000 D
10000 JB 150000 JBD
3600000 J 5200000 D
27000
2200000 J 3000000 D
NA
NA
50000 J NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
46000 JB NA
50000 JB NA
NA
NA
12000 JB NA
NA
120000 B NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
130000 NA
4400 J . NA
NA
5600 JB NA
54000 NA
36000 NA
= Diluted sample
= Di luted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed
GH-TP09-01
EAG83
MEAA09
E09
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
1200000 J
25000 B
6000 J
3100000 J
600000 J
2900000 J
180000 J
35000 J
260000 JB
330000 J
30000 JB
140000 JB
250000 J
64000 J
18000
GH-TP09-01 DL
EAG83 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
1500000 D
120000 JBD
4800000 D
620000 D
5100000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP10-01
EDA11
MEAA37
E52
5-25-89
(ug/kg)
4 JB
21 B
9 JB
2 J
230 J
67 JB
reported in mg/kg wet weight
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 5 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-TP11-01 GH-TP11-01 DL
EAG82 EAG82 DL
HEAA08 NA
E12 NA
5-17-89 5-17-89
(mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease
3270
8.7
10.3
10200
8.2
72000
405
51.8
155
4
39600
1810
37800
441
1.6
118
682
1.7
729
37.4
1740
138000
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch loroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
A-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
83000
120000
160000
40000
61000
14000
12000
J
JB
B
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
300000 JBD
170000 JBD
GH-TP12-01
EAG81
MEAA07
E11
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
6410 J
-- R
3.4
40.1 J
18900
39.2
5.2 J
11.7 J
10600 J
41.9 J
8120
130 J
18.7
535 J
.95 JB
136 J
18.6
64.4 J
9850 J
(ug/kg)
18000 J
3800 JB
800
440 J
1600 B
330 J
GH-TP12-01DL
EAG81 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
4600 JBD
2900 DB
GH-TP13-01
EAG90
MEAA16
E14
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
2040 J
-- R
4
17.9 J
46200
9.6
3.1 J
6.6 J
7030 J
15.1 J
11500
181 J
6.2 J
152 J
.67 JB
109 J
10.4
21.2 J
11500 J
(ug/kg)
40000
7500 JB
GH-FRTP13-01
EAG96
MEAA22
E15
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
1740 J
-- R
4.8
23.2 J
.84
47600
22.5
4.6 J
20.2 J
23700 J
31.5 J
13200
420 J
19.1
117 J
8.8
29.2 J
5270 J
< ug/kg>
55000
6800 BJ
GH-TP14-01 GH-TP14-01 DL
EAG97 EAG97 DL
MEAA23 NA
E13 NA
5-18-89 5-18-89
(mg/kg)
1540
5.5
40.5
478
21
7820
1200
66.9
801
2.6
496000
1990
3740
15900
574
5340
70.1
357
97000
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
7200
JB
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
21000 JBD
GH-TP15-01
EAG80
MEAA06
E10
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
2680 J
1.3 J
1.5 J
1110 J
.86 J
15400
99.6
8.7 J
41.1 J
5.5
5860 J
465 J
5690
102 J
.51
494
616 J
1.2 JB
325 J
38.6
7030 J
70700 J
(ug/kg)
190000 J
14000 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 6 of U)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Ethytbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methy (naphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k]f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl ph thai ate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-biitylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
GH-TP11-01
EAG82
MEAA08
E12
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
1600000 J
93000 B
2800000 J
190000
3300000 J
250000
8300 J
180000 B
41000 JB
8100 J
8800 J
18000 JB
45000 JB
13000 J
13000 J
560000
32000 J
33000 J
16000 JB
54000
NOTES:
GH-TP11-01 DL GH-TP12-01 GH-TP12-01DL
EAG82 DL EAG81
NA MEAA07
NA E11
5-17-89 5-17-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
1600000 D 14000
280000 DB 810 B
3300000 D 34000 J
190000 D
4300000 D 46000 J
NA
NA
NA 2300 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 7000 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA 5500 JB
NA
NA 2700 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 2100 J
NA
NA 6800 J
NA 1800 JB
NA
NA 7500
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
EAG81 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
11000 D
1500 JBD
37000 D
41000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DL
D
RE
NA
GH-TP13-01 GH-FRTP13-01
EAG90 EAG96
MEAA16 MEAA22
E14 E15
5-18-89 5-18-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
37000 17000
3200 JB
5300 JB
27000 12000
470 J 4900 J
430 JB 5800 JB
3000 JB
170 J
2100 22000 J
98 JB
= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed
GH-TP14-01 GH-TP14-01 DL
EAG97
MEAA23
E13
5-18-89
(ug/kg)
230000
11000 B
6100 J
700000 J
7200 J
24000 J
36000 J
5800 JB
17000 J
150000
180000
EAG97 DL
NA
NA
5-18-89
(ug/kg)
320000 DJ
790000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP15-01
EAG80
MEAA06
E10
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
530000 J
1800000 J
15000 J
1400000 J
9000 J
62000 B
8800 JB
11000 JB
8700 JB
25000 J
3600 JB
27000 J
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in mg/kg wet weight
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 7 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1, 2 -Dich I oroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
GH-TP15-01DL
EAG80 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
150000 JBD
150000 D
93000 JBD
GH-TP15-01RE
EAG80 RE
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
190000 J
12000 JB
GH-TP16-01
EAG95
MEAA21
E16
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
2330 J
-- R
3.6
6.4 J
71800
6.6
2.2 J
5 J
5170 J
4.8 J
14600
133 J
.09
4.9 J
322 J
.59 JB
123 J
7.8
17.7 J
142 JB
(ug/kg)
4400 J
610 JB
GH-TP17-01
EAG94
MEAA20
E17
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
2130 J
-- R
5.1
18 J
116000
6
4.2 J
5.1 J
5120 J
5.5 J
21400
180 J
4.8 J
710 J
.79 JB
184 J
6.5 J
18.6 J
1390 J
(ug/kg)
6300 J
1100 JB
380 J
620 JB
GH-TP18-01
EAG92
MEAA18
E19
5-19-89
(mg/kg)
2780
--
5.1
13.7
.43
98600
8.7
3.1
10.6
.79
8480
28.1
20500
233
7.6
496
168
9.4
58.1
295000
J
R
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
*
5600
JB
GH-TP19-01
EDA10
MEAA36
E20
5-19-89
(mg/kg)
3410 J
.77 J
4.4
9.1 J
67700
7.4
3.4 J
73.4 J
5460 J
16.6 J
15900
168 J
7.9
472 J
.92 JB
123 J
7.1 J
40.2 J
4840 J
(ug/kg)
4300 J
670 JB
GH-TP20-01
EDAOO
MEAA26
E22
5-22-89
(mg/kg)
1520
2.1 J
55.3
59300
8.6
2.6 J
6.1
42.6
4500
10.7 J
10300
137 J
6.8 J
74.6 J
5.8 J
38.7
51600 J
(ug/kg)
3100 J
390 JB
GH-TP21-01
EDA02
MEAA28
E31
5-22-89
(mg/kg)
3430
1.9
38.6
40800
13.8
3.3
7.4
6500
33.9
9310
152
7.1
251
252
12.2
34.7
4270
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
3700
410
J
JB
GH-TP22-01
EDA05
MEAA31
E33
5-23-89
(mg/kg)
2430
2.7
23.5 J
59900
8.7
2.7 J
9.7
5730
35.7 J
14000
164 J
8.1 J
314 J
115 J
9.4 J
46
364 J
(ug/kg)
37 B
8 B
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 8 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a)pyrene
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo tgh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k) fluoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
I ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
GH-TP15-01DL
EAG80 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
440000 D
100000 DB
1700000 D
1300000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
GH-TP15-01RE GH-TP16-01 GH-TP17-01
EAG80 RE EAG9S EAG94
NA MEAA21 MEAA20
NA E16 E17
5-17-89 5-18-89 5-18-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
530000 J 3400
930 B 990 B
1700000 J 850 B 1000 B
22000 J
1500000 J 700 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 140 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 110 JB 390 JB
NA 88 JB
NA
NA
NA 300 JB 540 JB
NA
NA 90 JB 230 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 59 J 620 J
NA
NA 210 JB 130 BJ
NA 49 JB
NA
NA
FR = Field replicate DL
FB = Field blank D
B = Blank contamination RE
J = Estimated value NA
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in mg/kg wet weight
GH-TP18-01 GM-TP19-01 GH-TP20-01
EAG92 EDA10 EDAOO
MEAA18 MEAA36 MEAA26
E19 E20 E22
5-19-89 5-19-89 5-22-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
4700 J 4200
980 B 590 JB
9300 B 2600 3800
3100 J 13000
3300 J 4700 J
160 JB
5700 JB 290 JB
2300 JB 77 JB
3800 J
5500 J
3700 J
58 JB 2600 JB
13000 8800
= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed
GH-TP21-01 GH-TP22-01
EDA02 EDA05
MEAA28 MEAA31
E31 E33
5-22-89 5-23-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
16000
620 JB 27 JB
3900 13
29000 J
11000 JB 170 BJ
97 BJ
1300 JB 38 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 9 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-TP23-01
EDA03
MEAA29
E32
5-23-89
(mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oi 1 & Grease
13000
1.8
986
.53
2.1
47700
44.7
11.5
48.4
20200
31
9750
750
34.4
1150
195
32.6
698
14800
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene '
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Ch I orobenzene
Chloroform
19000
490
J
JB
GH-TP24-01 GH-TP24-01 DL
EDA04 EDA04 DL
MEAA30 NA
E34 NA
5-23-89 5-23-89
(mg/kg)
4880
2.9
2930
5.5
54700
59.7
12.6
104
1.4
49000
2130 J
7460
552 J
.18
45.7
351 J
196 J
22.8
2780
7460 J
(ug/kg)
30 J
8 B
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
18 JBD
94 JBD
58 DJ
22 JBD
GH-TP25-01 GH-FRTP25-01 GH-FRTP25-01 RE
EDA13 EDA06 EDA06 RE:
MEAA39 MEAA32 N/l
E35 E36 NA
5-23-89 5-23-89 5-23-89
(mg/kg)
1710
1 J
7.4 J
45200
6.7
2.5 J
3.5 J
4480
5.2 J
8890
175 J
4.5 J
248 J
66.8 J
8.9 J
21.7
33000 J
(ug/kg)
6600 J
620 J
650 JB
(mg/kg)
2650
1.3
32.4
38200
19.5
4.8
15
7260
3.9
8560
155
7.3
86.3
11.5
210
27100
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
26000
1100
580
J
J
JB
(mg/kg:i
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
6100 J
790 J
590 JB
GH-TP26-01
EDA08
MEAA34
E38
5-24-89
(mg/kg)
1830
1.5 J
9 J
35700
5.2
3.5 J
4410
8.1 J
8410
125 J
13.2
372 J
74.8 J
8.8 J
21.2
66100 J
(ug/kg)
28000 J
590 BJ
GH-TP26-01* GH-TP26-01* LIQUID
EDA22 NA
NA MEAA40 L
NA NA
5-24-89 5-24-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1500 JB
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
(mg/kg wet
weight)
234 J
9.6 J
785 JB
6 J
11.2 J
183 J
61.2 J
7.2 J
1640 J
-- R
760 J
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
06-Har-90
TABLE 9
(Page 10 of H)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
1TR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 , 2 - D i ch 1 orobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a)pyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzotghilperylene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-buty I phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
GH-TP23-01 GH-TP24-01 GH-TP24-01 DL GH-TP25-01
EDA03 EDA04 EDA04 DL EDA13
HEAA29 MEAA30 NA MEAA39
E32 E34 NA E35
5-23-89 5-23-89 5-23-89 5-23-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
22 12 DJ 7500
1500 B 68 JB 89 JBD 590 JB
3 J
3 J
5600 570 J 460 DJ 16000
510 J
130 12 DJ 12000
NA
NA
130 J NA 15000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 7500
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in ma/kg wet weight
GH-FRTP25-01 GH-FRTP25-01 RE
EDA06
MEAA32
E36
5-23-89
(ug/kg)
9000 J
1100 JB
19000 J
500 J
13000 J
7300 J
8400
DL = Diluted sample
D = Di luted result
RE = Sample reanalyzed
NA = Not analyzed
EDA06 RE
NA
NA
5-23-89
(ug/kg)
8500 J
560 JB
18000 J
390 J
22000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP26-01
EDA08
MEAA34
E38
5-24-89
(ug/kg)
1300
860 B
7100
2500
-- R
-- R
870 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
360 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
2100 J
GH-TP26-01*
EDA22
NA
NA
5-24-89
(ing/kg wet
weight)
-- R
460 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
7 J
14 J
GH-TP26-01* LIQUID
NA
MEAA40 L
NA
5-24-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 11 of U)
SAMPLE: GH-TP26-01* SOLID
OTR NUMBER: NA
ITR NUMBER: MEAA40 S
SAS NUMBER: NA
DATE SAMPLED: 5-24-89
(mg/kg wet
GH-TP27-01
EAG88
MEAA14
E45
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-FRTP27-01
EAG89
MEAA15
E46
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP28-01
EAG98
MEAA24
E47
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP28-01DL
EAG98DL
NA
NA
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP29-01 GH-TP29-01DL
EAG86 EAG86DL
MEAA12 NA
E41 NA
5-24-89 5-24-89
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
GH-TP30-01
EAG84
HEAA10
E40
5-24-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP31-01
EDA09
MEAA35
E39
5-24-89
(mg/kg)
weight)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease
5500
58.4
1.2
1890
55.6
10.8
40
3160
60
1630
36
.4
10900
--
38.4
3700
NA
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
R
J
J
(mg/kg wet
3090
3.9
295
54100
7.1
4.1
3.1
7640
12.4
16600
332
8.2
603
96.9
.75
12.5
25.3
1790
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
6680
3.9
1040
62800
12.5
8.2 J
14.1
13700
15.7 J
20300
641 J
15.8
1060 J
132 J
21.8
49.3
52.3 JB
(ug/kg)
306
52.3
4.7
5060
7
11.9
1.2
6150
27.6 J
318 J
76.6 J
135 J
56.8 J
1.6 J
993
26300 J
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
3620
5.3 J
307
9.8
19100
146
37.7
478
1.4
45200
413 J
90SO
642 J
.49
226
881 J
748 J
31.7
857
35000 J
(u<|/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
2920
5
57.8
73800
10.3
3.5 J
22.7
7530
40.3 J
17600
304 J
29.6
203 J
70.7 J
11.4
210
2110 J
(ug/kg)
2110
1.2 J
19.6 J
39900
6.4
2.6 J
2.6 J
5050
11.4 J
10700
154 J
5.2 J
475 J
76.4 J
9.9 J
21.2
37700 J
(ug/kg)
weight)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Oichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
560
4900
1200
750
1300
--
--
J
J
J
J
JB
R
R
6 JB
-- R
9100 JBD
14000 JBD
-- R
-- R
19000 J
1400 J
440 JB
-- R
25000 J
480 JB
750
23000 J
710 BJ
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 12 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 , 2-D i ch 1 orobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-buty I phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
GH-TP26-01* SOLID
NA
MEAA40 S
NA
5-24-89
(dig/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
GH-TP27-01 GH-FRTP27-01 GH-TP28-01
EAG88 EAG89 EAG98
MEAA14 HEAA15 MEAA24
E45 E46 E47
5-25-89 5-25-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
750 J 6 JB 380000 J
1100 JB 21 B 1100 B
-- R
1100 JB 7 JB 66000 J
1200 J 7 J 640000 J
8600 J
2600 JB
150 J
100 J 370 J 63000
FR = Field replicate DL
FB = Field blank D
B = Blank contamination RE
J - Estimated value NA
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in cng/kg wet weight
GH-TP28-01DL GH-TP29-01
EAG98DL EAG86
NA MEAA12
NA E41
5-25-89 5-24-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
230000 DJ 35000 J
720 B
-- R
42000 DJ 11000
400000 DJ 81000 J
NA
NA
NA 10000 J
NA
NA
NA 3900 J
NA
NA 11000 J
NA 17000 J
NA 7000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 13000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 5700 JB
NA 16000 J
NA
NA 7900 J
NA
NA 45000 J
NA 13000 J
NA
NA 18000 J
NA
NA
= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed
GH-TP29-01DL
EAG86DL
NA
NA
5-24-89
(ug/kg)
42000 DJ
15000 DJ
98000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP30-01 GH-TP31-01
EAG84 EDA09
MEAA10 MEAA35
E40 E39
5-24-89 5-24-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
1500
880 B 810 B
1100 B 2900
11000 3300
1500 17000 J
6000 JB
2400
440 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 13 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-TP32-01 GH-TP32-01 DL
EAG99 EDG99 DL
MEAA25 NA
E49 NA
5-25-89 5-25-89
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
GH-TP33-01
EAG87
MEAA13
E48
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP33-01*
EDA23
MEAA41
NA
5-25-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oi 1 & Grease
2430
3.1
19.6
106000
14
4.7
6.8
36
6170
19
12500
213
15.1
441
126
10
158
8530
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
4560
1.5 J
88.5
1.9
51600
34.5
4.8 J
38.1
1.4
10100
1930 J
13300
299 J
11.8
498 J
116 J
15.9
169
16600 J
(ug/kg)
20300
322
6.4
37300
47.2
36.4
11100
363
8760
210
37.2
--
3820
26.4
372
NA
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
R
J
J
J
(mg/kg wet
weight)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
34000
4500
800
--
--
J
J
JB
R
R
6600 JBD
18000 JBD
-- R
-- R
110000
-- R
6
12
630
36
820
56
14
J
J
J
J
GH-TP33-01DL*
EDA23 DL
NA
NA
5-25-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)
700 D
-- R
1100 D
830 JBD
GH-TP35-01
EDA07
MEAA33
E37
5-24-89
(mg/kg)
1930
1.6
6.6
66000
6.1
2.6
2.7
6130
2.1
13800
190
5.4
294
102
8.5
25.4
336
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
6
6
JB
B
GH-TP36-01 GH-FBTP01-01 GH-FBTP02-01
EDA01 EAG91 EDA12
MEAA27 MEAA17 MEAA38
E23 E21 E53
5-22-89 5-19-89 5-25-89
(mg/kg)
1940
2 J
7.7 J
103000
6.6
2.5 J
4.7 J
5000
10.8 J
21900
246 J
4.8 J
101 J
8.1 J
17
15300 J
(ug/kg)
3300 J
470 JB
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
57.1 J 32.3 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
53.2 J 36.8
1.7 J .48 J
206 J
.64 JB
.86 J
39.5 JB 54 J
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
2 JB
18 J
6 JB 4 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
(Page 14 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 , 2-D i ch I orobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methy (naphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene
Benzo tghilperylene
Benzo [k]f luoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
F luoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254
GH-TP32-01
EAG99
MEAA25
E49
5-25-89
(ug/kg)
240000 J
1000 JB
-- R
490 J
53000 J
5300 J
50000 J
9500 J
8000 JB
3500 JB
11000 JB
14000 J
2800 JB
GH-TP32-01 DL
EDG99 DL
NA
NA
5-25-89
(ug/kg)
290000 DJ
-- R
25000 DJ
180000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
GH-TP33-01 GH-TP33-01*
EAG87 EDA23
MEAA13 MEAA41
E48 NA
5-25-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg) (mg/kg wet
weight)
730000 J 3400 J
11 B
84
870000 J 2400 J
65000 1100 J
1700000 J 16000 J
100000 J 600
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
28000 JB 920
18000 JB 12000
-- R
-- R 1200
-- R
-- R
-- R
37000 J 620
2800 J
-- R
5300 400 J
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
GH-TP33-01DL* GH-TP35-01 GH-TP36-01
EDA23 DL EDA07 EDA01
NA MEAA33 MEAA27
NA E37 E23
5-25-89 5-24-89 5-22-89
(mg/kg wet (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
weight)
4700 D 110
42 JB 520 JB
7500 D 62 1700
1200 D
29000 D 11000
580 J
810 J 130 BJ
26000
2000 J
690 J
4100 J
3200 JB
NA
NA 9300
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
RE = Sample reanalyzed
NA = Not analyzed
GH-FBTP01-01 GH-FBTP02-01
EAG91 EDA12
MEAA17 MEAA38
E21 E53
5-19-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
36 J 15 JB
1 J
100 JB
38 JB
280 JB
32 J
100 JB
38 J
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in mg/kg wet
weight
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 1 of 20)
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SOIL BORINGS - SUBSURFACE SOIL
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-B13-11-15-01
EDA32
E70
6-15-89
GH-B14-11-15-01
EAG66
E63
6-13-89
GH-B14-15-19-02
EAG67
E64
6-13-89
GH-B15-10-13-01
EOA34
E72
6-15-89
GH-B16-9-12-01
EDA31
NA
6-15-89
GH-B16-12-17-02
EDA30
E71
6-15-89
GH-GH03C-41-42-01
EDA88
NA
7-06-89
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
17000 BJ
120000 J
37000 B
210000 J
640000 J
16 B 69 JB 25 JB 14 JB 8 JB
12
3 J
23 B 26 B 6 B 6 B 4 BJ
210 220 140 130 J 28
400 J
14 JB
18 JB
45 JB
26 J
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene 1600
4-Methylphenol 120 J
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene 57 J
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzotalpyrene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene
Benzotk]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene and
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 4600 B
Butyl benzyl phthalate 2500
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate 1600 B
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene 160 J
Fluorene
56 JB
240 JB
120 JB
39 JB
870 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 2 of 20)
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE 111 ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SOIL BORINGS - SUBSURFACE SOIL
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oil & grease
GH-B13-11-15-01 GH-BU-11-15-01 GH-BH-15-19-02 GH-B15-10-13-01
EDA32 EAG66 EAG67 EDA34
E70 £63 E64 E72
6-15-89 6-13-89 6-13-89 6-15-89
440
3000
400 61 J
170 J
1000 88 J
1200 120 J
111 JB 112 JB 150 JB 191 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-B16-9-12-01 GH-B16-12-17-02 GH-GH03C-41 -42-01
EDA31 EDA30 EDA88
NA E71 NA
6-15-89 6-15-89 7-06-89
55 J
NA 70.2 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 3 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-GH15C-78. 5-80. 5-01 GH-GH15C-78. 5-80. 5-01 RE GH-GH198-25-26-01 GH-GH19B-30-31-02 GH-GH27A-9-11-01 GH-GH28A-9-11-01
OTR NUMBER: EDA42 EDA42 RE NA EOA38 EDA24 EDA25
SAS NUMBER: NA NA E86 NA E65 E66
DATE SAMPLED: 7-18-89 7-18-89 7-13-89 7-13-89 6-14-89 6-14-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2, 2- Te t rach I oroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone 5 JB
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride 1 JB
Toluene 860 J
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 2 -Di Chlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] py rene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [k]f luoranthene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo [k] f luoranthene
Benzo ic acid 44 JB
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 43 JB
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
10 JBD
1200 JD
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA -•• R
NA
NA 34 JB 5 BJ 24 B
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 64 JB 15 B 19 B
NA 220 220 110
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 4 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
A, It' -DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
Oi 1 & grease
GH-GH15C-78. 5-80. 5-01 GH-GH15C-78.
EDA42
NA
7-18-89
NA
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
5-80.5-01 RE
EDA42 RE
NA
7-18-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GH19B-25-26-01
NA
E86
7-13-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
119 B
GH-GH19B-30-31-02 GH-GH27A-9-11-01 GH-GH28A-9-11-01
EDA38 EDA24 EDA25
NA E65 E66
7-13-89 6-14-89 6-14-89
>
NA 115 JB 133 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 5 or
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
GH-GH29C-25-26-02
EDA94
E83
7-08-89
9 JB
14 JB
80 JB
120
GH-GH29C-2S-26-02 RE GH-GH29C-45-46-02
EDA94 RE EDA41
NA NA
7-08-89 7-09-89
11 JB
20 JB 16 JB
38 JB 54 JB
81 120
GH-GH30B-12-14-01
EDA95
E84
7-09-89
-- R
210 JB
260 JB
520
GH-GH30B-24-26-02
EDA37
E85
7-09-89
8 JB
16 JB
39
120 JB
160
GH-GH31C-24-26-01
EDA90
E61
7-07-89
44 JB
48 JB
180 JB
980
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-D j chlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene and
Benzo[k] f Iuoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
FIuoranthene
Fluorene
120 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
440
89 JB
85 JB
670 B
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 6 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GH29C-25-26-02 GH-GH29C-25-26-02 RE GH-GH29C-45-46-02
EDA94 EDA94 RE EDA41
E83 NA NA
7-08-89 7-08-89 7-09-89
GH-GH30B-12-14-01 GH-GH30B-24-26-02 GH-GH31C-24-26-01
EDA95 EDA37 EDA90
E84 ESS E81
7-09-89 7-09-89 7-07-89
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4, 4' -DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg)
Oil & grease
217 JB
NOTES:
FR = field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL - Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
NA NA
usable
272 JB 112 JB 101 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 7 of 30)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GH31C-49-51-02
EDA91
E82
7-07-89
GH-GH32A-12-16-01
EDA92
E78
6-22-89
GH-FRGH32A-12-16-01
EDA93
E79
6-22-89
GH-GH33B-9-10-01
EDA36
E74
6-16-89
GH-GH33B-10-11-01
EDA99
E75
6-16-89
GH-GH35A-13-15-01
EOA29
E69
6-U-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo [a] pyretic
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fIuoranthene
Benzo[blfluoranthene and
Benzo[k]fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
FIuoranthene
Fluorene
68 JB
17
73 JB
160 J
130 JB
430 J
-- R
160 JB
90 JB
890
24 B
3 J
4 J
19 B
180
760 J
4 BJ
11 B
21
18 B
15 B
170
360 JB
65 J
50 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 8 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(tng/kg>
Oi 1 & grease
GH-GH31C-49-51-02 GH-GH32A-12-16-01
EDA91 EDA92
E82 E78
7-07-89 6-22-89
166 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-FRGH32A-12-16-01 GH-GH33B-9-10-01 GH-GH33B-10-11-01 GH-GH35A-13-15-01
EDA93 EOA36 EDA99 EDA29
E79 E74 E75 E69
6-22-89 6-16-89 6-16-89 6-K-89
63 J
41 J
49 J
71.7 JB 132 JB 106 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 9 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-GH35B-28-30-01 FRGH-GH35B-28-30-01 GH-GH37A-4-7-01 GH-
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
EDA27
E67
6-14-89
EDA26
E68
6-14-89
EDA28
NA
6-U-89
GH38A-9-13-01 GH-L01-3-6-01 GH-L02-4-6-01 GH-L03-4-6-01
EDA33
NA
6-15-89
EDA96
E76
6-16-89
EDA97
E77
6-16-89
EDA98
NA
6-19-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1 -0 i chIoroethene
1,2-0 i chIoroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trich Ioroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-0 i chIorobenzene
2-Hethylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzofajpyrene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene and
Benzo[k]fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
5 BJ
12 B
230
5 BJ
17 B
51
7 JB
14 B
85
300 J
79 J
250 J
540 B
240 J
200 J
80 J
140 J
15000 J
320000
43000 BJ
510000
1700000
13000 J
83000 JB
35000 J
11000 JB
2 BJ
9 B
38
5 BJ
13 B
14 B
110
890 J
280 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 10 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4' -DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oi 1 & grease
GH-GH35B-28-30-01 FRGH-GH35B-28-30-01 GH-GH37A-4-7-01
EDA27 EDA26 EDA28
E67 E68 NA
6-14-89 6-14-89 6-14-89
210 J
240 J
220 J
120 J
138 JB 100 JB NA
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-GH38A-9- 13-01 GH-L01-3-6-01 GH-L02-4-6-01 GH-L03-4-6-01
EDA33 EDA96 EDA97 EDA98
NA E76 E77 NA
6-15-89 6-16-89 6-16-89 6-19-89
40000 J
460 J
19 J
9300 J
26000 J 370 J
NA 52.1 JB 320 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 11 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RB25-22-26-01 GH-RB25-22-26-01 RE GH-RB26- 18-22-01 GH-RB27-21-25-01 GH-RB27-21-25-01 DL GH-RB27-25-29-02
OTR NUMBER: EAG72 EAG72 RE EAG71 EAG69 EAG69 DL EAG68
SAS NUMBER: E42 NA E43 E50 NA E51
DATE SAMPLED: 5-24-89 5-24-89 5-24-89 5-25-89 5-25-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 1 . 1 - Tr i ch I oroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethene
1 , 2 -D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 ,2, 4- Tri chlorobenzene
1,2-Di chlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4 -Methyl phenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
BenzoCalpyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzo [k)f luoranthene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo tk] f I uoranthene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylph thai ate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
26
300
61
5
4
410
26
590
8
1100
41
300
100
130
J
JB
J
J
J
B
J
J
J
JB
J
JB
8200 DJ
9400 DJ
29000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
--
--
4200
--
--
--
150000
2000
37000
--
300000
1400
54
290
770
81
66
1900
650
92
320
390
460
470
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
J
R
R
R
J
JB
J
R
J
J
J
J
J
JB
J
J
JB
42000
--
4500
--
--
--
240000
2100
110000
16000
540000
1500
62
50
91
53
310
74
93
R
R
R
R
J
R
R
J
R
R
R
J
JB
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
JB
J
J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
3700 DJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
220000 DJ
-- R
110000 DJ
16000 DJ
490000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2 J
170 J
160 J
56 JB
13
2 JB
540 J
25 B
390 J
30
1300 J
96 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 12 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-RB25-22-26-01 GH-RB25-22-26-01 RE GH-RB26-18- 22-01 GH-RB27-21 -25-01 GH-RB27-21 -25-01 OL GH-RB27-25-29-02
EAG72
E42
5-24-89
EAG72 RE EAG71 EAG69
NA E43 E50
5-24-89 5-24-89 5-25-89
EAG69 DL
NA
5-25-89
EAG68
E51
5-25-89
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
99 J
130 J
65 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
NA
NA 3200
NA
NA 1300 68 J
NA
NA 220 J 110 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg)
Oil & grease
109 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
0 = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
NA 1540 J 205 JB
usable
NA
78 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 13 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RB27-25-29-02 RE GH-RB28-17-21-01 GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 DL GH-RB28-17-21-01 RE GH-RB28-17-21-01 DL RE GH-RB28-23-27-02
OTR NUMBER: EAG68 RE EDA15 EDA15 DL EDA15 RE EDA15 DL RE EDA18
SAS NUMBER: NA £54 NA NA NA ESS
DATE SAMPLED: 5-25-89 5-30-89 5-30-89 5-30-89 5-30-89 5-30-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Oichtoroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulf ide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 , 2 - D i ch I orobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo tb] f luoranthene
Benzo [k] f luoranthene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo [k] f I uorant hene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F luoranthene
Fluorene
230 DJ
250 D
380 JBD
11 DJ
22 JBD
980 D
160 JBD
490 DJ
34 D
2200 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
540
460
37000
120000
5400
160
980
11000
2800
740
4100
160
810
J
JB
J
J
J
JB
J
J
J
J
4600 JBD
42000 D
150000 D
410 DJ
4000 DJ
750 DJ
11000 JBD
3000 DJ
620 DJ
4800 DJ
890 DJ
850 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7000 J
1000
8800 J
2900 J
830
4700 J
130 J
980 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
540 JB
71 J
240 JB
100 J
130 JB
390 J
60 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 14 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-RB27-25-29-02 RE GH-RB28-17-21-01 GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 DL GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 RE GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 DL RE GH-RB28-23-27-02
EAG68 RE
NA
5-25-89
EDA15
E54
5-30-89
EDA15 DL
NA
5-30-89
EDA15 RE EDA15 DL RE
NA NA
5-30-89 5-30-89
EDA 18
E55
5-30-89
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 15 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RB28-23-27-02 RE GH-RD24-24-28-01 GH-RL29-39-43-01 GH-RU10-16- 19-01 GH-RU21 -24-26-02 GH-RU21 -24-26-02 DL
OTR NUMBER: EDA18 RE EAG64 EDA89 EAG63 EDA17 EDA17 OL
SAS NUMBER: NA E62 E80 E61 E59 NA
DATE SAMPLED: 5-30-89 6-08-89 7-07-89 6-08-89 6-06-89 6-06-89
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene and
Benzo [k] f luoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
90 J
220 JB
86 J
44 J
140 J
65 J
4200 J
180000
-- R 1 J
10000 J
140 JB 36000 JB 53 B
120000 1 J
8 B 3100 B 32000 JB 3 JB
160 2900 330000 260 J
27000
460000 13
8700
13000
260 J
360 JB 360 JB 4500 B 120 JB
2500
110 JB 2900 B 200 JB
97
7
260
6
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
JBD
JBD
D
DJ
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 16 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oil & grease
GH-RB28-23-27-02 RE GH-RD24-24-28-01 GH-RL29-39-43-01
EDA18 RE EAG64 EDA89
NA E62 E80
5-30-89 6-08-89 7-07-89
1300
280 J
150 J
89 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 168 JB 126 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
0 = Di luted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-RW10-16-19-01 GH-RW21 -24-26-02 GH-RU21 -24-26-02 DL
EAG63 EDA17 EDA17 DL
E61 E59 NA
6-08-89 6-06-89 6-06-89
NA
22000 87 J NA
NA
4200 NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
48000 NA
48000 NA
NA
NA
54100 J 262 JB NA
\
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 17 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RU21-16-20-01 GH-RW21- 16-20-01 DL GH-RU22- 19-23-01 GH-RW23-14-20-01 GH-RU23-20-22-02 GH-RW24- 18-22-01
OTR NUMBER: EOA19
SAS NUMBER: £58
DATE SAMPLED: 6-06-89
EDA19 DL
NA
6-06-89
EAG73 EDA21
NA E60
6-13-89 6-07-89
EDA20
NA
6-07-89
EDA14
E56
5-31-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-D i ch loroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene 13
Methylene chloride
Toluene 64
Trich loroethene
Xylene (total) 89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
300000 B
860000 J 5 J
120000 BJ 2 JB
1400000 J 180
4600000 J 61
3 J
33 B
3 JB
67
1 J
28
2800 B
2700
1600 JB
9000
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-D i chIorobenzene
2-Methy(naphthalene
4-Methyl phenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzotalpyrene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene and
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthaiate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
2100
1900 DJ
2800
480 DJ
2400 B
560
1200 B
120 JB
110 J
340 JB
100 J
150 JB
100 J
8800 J
51 J
3400 JB
630 J
62 J
1000 JB
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 18 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitcosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Arocloc-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oi 1 & grease
GH-RU21- 16-20-01 GM-RW21-16-20-01 DL GH-RW22- 19- 23-01 GH-RW23-H-20-01
EDA19 EDA19 DL EAG73 EDA21
E58 NA NA E60
6-06-89 6-06-89 6-13-89 6-07-89
600 J 740 DJ 4700
1800 DJ
390 J
8400 D 4100 D 900 J
8.3 J
4040 J NA NA 260 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-RU23-20-22-02 GH-RU24- 18-22-01
EDA20 EDA14
NA £56
6-07-89 5-31-89
15000 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
670 J
53 J
-- R
NA 5590 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 19 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RU24-18-22-01RE GH-RW24-18-22-01 DL RE GH-RW30-23-25-01 GH-FBRB01-01 GH-FBRB02-01 FBRB03-01
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
EDAK RE
NA
5-31-89
EDAK DL RE
NA
5-31-89
EAG65 EAG70 EDA16 EDA35
NA E44 E57 E73
6-09-89 5-24-89 6-06-89 6-15-89
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 1 , 1 - T r i ch I oroethane
1 , 1 -0 i ch I oroethene
1,2-Oichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
13
150 B 25 JB
2 J
6 B 80 JB 8 B
80 2 BJ
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hethylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene and
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
12000 J
81 J
2900
350
83
1200
8400 DJ
4100 DJ
500 DJ
1300 JBD
90 JB
82 J
110 J
79 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
(Page 20 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroc lor- 1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oi 1 & grease
GH-RU24-18-22-01RE GH-RW24- 18-22-01 DL RE GH-RU30-23-25-01 GH-FBRB01-01 GH-FBRB02-01
EDA14 RE EDA14 DL RE EAG65 EAG70 EDA16
NA NA NA E44 E57
5-31-89 5-31-89 6-09-89 5-24-89 6-06-89
13000 J 20000 DJ
130 J
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA NA 169 J 14.9 J
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
FBRB03-01
EDA35
E73
6-15-89
210 J
-------
10-Jan-90
TABLE 11
(Page 1 of 6)
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TEST PIT AND SOIL BORING - DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSIS
SAMPLE: GH-TP01-01 GH-TP01-01RE GH-TP02-01 GH-TP02-01RE GH-FRTP02-01RE GH-TP07-01 GH-TP08-01 GH-TP18-01 GH-TP18-01RE GH-TP19-01
SAS NUMBER: 4636E05
DATE SAMPLED: 5-19-89
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD 15.702 J
Octa-CDD 43.098 J
2.3,7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF 4.25 J
4636E05RE
5-19-89
3.409 J
11.312 J
40.062 J
5.846 J
5.463 J
2.819 J
4636E01
5-16-89
.888 J
1.833 J
3.042 J
.212 J
.253 J
1.082 J
.629 J
4636E01RE
5-16-89
.739 J
2.239 J
4.543 J
1.299 J
.786 J
4636E02RE
5-16-89
.079 J
.72 J
1.384
.361
.229
4636E03
5-16-89
1.055
.304
.532
.808 J
2.396 J
6.398
4636E04
5-16-89
1.157 J
9.246 J
16.856
.404
1.993
1.142 J
5.844 J
5.809
4636E06
5-19-89
2.097 J
8.049 J
9.431 J
2.152 J
3.542 J
4636E06RE
5-19-89
3.269 J
9.473 J
6.212 J
4.92 J
10.292 J
2.247 J
4636E07
5-19-89
.082 J
.326 J
.056 J
.205 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
10-Jan-90
TABLE 11
(Page 2 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-TP19-01RE GH-TP21-01RE GH-TP2S-01 GH-TP25-01RE GH-TP26-01RE GH-TP28-01 CH-TP29-01 GH-TP29-01RE GH-TP30-01 GH-TP31-01
SAS NUHBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-COD
Octa-CDD
2,3.7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-COF
4636E07RE
5-19-89
.14 J
.429 J
.473 J
.174 J
.428 J
.078 J
4636E08RE 4636E11
5-22-89 5-23-89
.437 J
.08 .768 J
.112 1.113 J
.784 J
.043 1.616 J
.385 J
4636E11RE
5-23-89
.325 J
1.171 J
1.771 J
.909 J
2.017 J
.399 J
4636E12RE 4636E18 4636E13 4636E13RE
5-24-89 5-25-89 5-24-89 5-24-89
.318 J .746 J 1.319 J
.608 1.834 J 2.796 J
.177 1.291 J
.282 .329 J
.207 J .324 J
4636E14 4636E15
5-24-89 5-24-89
1.207 J
.934 J
.331 J
1.03 J
2.984 J
.622 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
10-Jan-90
TABLE 11
(Page 3 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-TP31-01RE GH-TP33-01 GH-TP35-01 GH-TP-36-01 GH-TP36-01RE GH-FRTP36-01 GH-FRTP36-01RE GH-TPFB02-01 GH-B13-11-15-01
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-COD
Octa-COD
2.3,7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
4636E15RE 4636E17 4636E16
5-24-89 5-25-89 5-24-89
1.134 J
1.025 J .376 J
.665 J 1.752
1.02 J
2.685 J
.638 J
4636E09 4636E09RE
5-22-89 5-22-89
.139 J
.318 J
.403 J
'-
.164 J
.481 J .574 J
.153 J
4636E10
5-22-89
.139 J
.434 J
.426 J
.157 J
.542 J
.177 J
4636E10RE 4636E19
5-22-89 5-25-89
.142 J
.632 J
.767 J
.198 J
.722 J
.281 J
4711E15
6-15-89
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
10-Jan-90 TABLE 11 (Page 4 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-BU-11-15-01 GH-GH19B-25-26-01 GH-GH29C-24-25-01 GH-GH35A-13-15-01 GH-GH42B-14-16-01 GH-RB2S-22-26-01 GH-RB26-18-22-01
SAS NUMBER: 4711E13 4711E20 4711E19 4711E16 4711E14 4711E01 4711E02
DATE SAMPLED: 6-13-89 7-13-89 7-08-89 6-14-89 6-20-89 5-24-89 5-24-89
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD .435
Octa-CDD .445
2,3,7,8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
10-Jan-90
TABLE 11
(Page 5 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-RB27-21-25-01 GH-RB27-25-29-02 GH-RB28-17-21-01 GH-RB28-23-27-02 GH-RL29-39-43-01 GH-RW10-16-19-01 GH-RU21-16-20-01
SAS NUMBER: 4711 £04
DATE SAMPLED: 5-25-89
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD
Octa-CDD
2.3,7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
4711E05 4711E06
5-25-89 5-30-89
.329
.381
.227
.66
.209
4711E07 4711E18 4711E11
5-30-89 7-07-89 6-08-89
.06 J
1.41
3.876
.064
.218
1.225
1.57
4711E09
6-06-89
.087 J
.387
.614
.011
.249
.921
.302
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
10-Jan-90 TABLE 11 (Page 6 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-RU22-19-23-01 GH-RU23-U-20-01 GH-RU24-18-22-01 GH-FBRB01-01 GH-FBR804-01
SAS NUMBER: 4711E12 4711E10 4711E08 4711E03 4711E17
DATE SAMPLED: 6-13-89 6-07-89 5-31-89 5-24-89 6-21-89
(ug/kg)
Hexa-COD
Hepta-CDD .339
Octa-CDD .737 .422
2,3,7,8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF .15
Octa-CDF
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
04-Jan-90
TABLE 12
(Page 1 of 2)
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TEST PITS AND SOIL BORINGS - INCINERATION PARAMETERS
SAMPLE: GH-TP01-01 GH-TP06-01
SAS NUMBER: 4634E30 4634E26
DATE SAMPLED: 5-19-89 5-16-89
Percent Moisture
Percent Ash
Percent Volatile Matter
Percent Fixed Carbon
Heating Value (BTU/lb)
23.6
44.5
19.9
12
6230
12.2
75.6
12.7
2150
GH-TP08-01 GH-FRTP08-01 GH-TP09-01 GH-TP11-01 GH-TP15-01 GH-B13-11-15-01
4634E24 4634E25 4634E29 4634E28 4634E27 4730E05
5-16-89 5-16-89 5-17-89 5-17-89 5-17-89 6-15-89
32.9 25.2 42.8 27.8 19.5
42.8 62.8 39.9 55.7 25.6
22.9 13.7 23.9 20.3 55.3
1.4
3880 666 2160 3050 6590
12.67
78.94
9.92
-1.53
20
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
04-Jan-90
TABLE 12
(Page 2 of 2)
SAMPLE: GH-B15-10-13-01 GH-GH38A-9-13-01 GH-RB28-23-27-02 GH-RU21- 16-20-01 GH-RU22- 19-23-01 GH-RU24- 18-22-01
SAS NUMBER: 4730E07 4730E06 4730E01 4730E03 4730E04 4730E02
DATE SAMPLED: 6-15-89 6-15-89 5-30-89 6-06-89 6-13-89 5-31-89
Percent Moisture
Percent Ash
Percent Volatile Matter
Percent Fixed Carbon
Heating Value (BTU/lb)
9.67
73.79
11.76
4.78
32
12.04
74.93
15.22
-1.63
165
13.79
79.85
6.1
.26
28
12.84
78.15
7.33
1.68
3.5
8.06
72.08
20.83
-.97
43
12.7
70.45
13.99
2.86
393
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
J = Estimated value
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 13
(Page 1 of 6)
•G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SEDIMENT
SAMPLE: GH-SD01-02* GH-SD01-02 DL*
OTR NUMBER: EDFOO EDFOO DL
ITR NUMBER: HEACOO NA
DATE SAMPLED: 8-01-89 8-01-89
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
11 JB
4 JB
5 J
10
.5 JB
1 J
180 J
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)
39 JBD
22 JBD
5 D
10 D
3 JBD
160 D
GH-SD02-02*
EDF01
MEAC01
8-01-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
21 JB
23 J
2 J
25
2 JB
2 J
150
GH-SD03-02*
EDF02
MEAC02
8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
9 JB
1 JB
.7 J
1
.3 JB
52
GH-FRSD03-02*
EDF07
MEAC07
8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
12 JB
11 J
1 JB
GH-SD04-02* GH-SD04-02 L
EDF03 EDF03 L
MEAC03 NA
8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
14 JB
11 JB
1 JB
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
-- R
-- R
18 BJ
GH-SD05-02
EDF04
MEAC04
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
3550
128
387
52000
10.6
8.2
48.5
16200
109
9440
166
.49
18
1180
2200
17.3
48.1
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
30
B
GH-SD06-02
EDF05
MEAC05
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
45100
47.4
543
2
79800
93.5
33.8
139
86400
466
37400
1100
.57
83.9
5400
1640
100
392
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
34
420
220
J
B
B
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 13
(Page 2 of 6)
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SEDIMENT
SAMPLE: GH-SD01-02*
OTR NUMBER: EDFOO
ITR NUMBER: MEACOO
DATE SAMPLED: 8-01-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
4,4'-DDE
4.4'-DDT
Aroclor-1254 74
2-Methylnaphthatene 12 J
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzotalpyrene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo [kl f I uorant hene
Benzo [ghilperylene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Chtoroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 140
Butyl benzyl phthalate 16
Chrysene
Dibenzo [a, h] anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate 16
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F luoranthene
Fluorene
I ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 30
Naphthalene 8 J
Phenanthrene 6 J
Phenol 16
Pyrene
NOTES:
GH-SD01-02 DL* GH-SD02-02* GH-SD03-02* GH-FRSD03-02*
EDFOO DL EDF01 EDF02 x EDF07
NA MEAC01 MEAC02 MEAC07
8-01-89 8-01-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg wet (mg/kg wet (mg/kg wet (mg/kg wet
weight) weight) weight) weight)
NA
NA
NA 14 J 5.3 J 4.6 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 30 22 4 J
NA 8 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 6 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 6 J
NA 4 J
NA
NA 3 J
NA
FR = Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
L = Reanalyzed as low to medium concentration samples
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
GH-SD04-02* GH-SD04-02 L GH-SD05-02 GH-SD06-02
EDF03
MEAC03
8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF03 L EDF04 EDF05
NA MEAC04 MEAC05
8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
3500 J 3000 J
6800
970 J 2500 J
230 J
230 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 13
(Page 3 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-SD07-02* GH-SD07-02 L
OTR NUMBER: EOF06 EDF06 L
ITR NUMBER: MEAC06 NA
DATE SAMPLED: 8-02-89 8-02-89
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
9 JB
.9 JB
.8 JB
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
-- R
-- R
GH-SD08-02* GH-SD08-02 L
EDF09 EDF09 L
MEAC09 NA
8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
10 JB
3 JB
1 JB
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
-- R
-- R
9 J
1000 J
22 J
GH-SD09-02 GH-FRS009-02
EOF11 EDF10
ME AC 11 ME AC 10
8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg)
3160 J
6.6 J
33.9 J
5700 J
8.6
3.9 JB
13.9
5950 J
9.1
2840
51.2 J
6.8 J
291 J
721 J
8.9 J
18.8 J
(ug/kg)
9 J
76 B
37 B
3 J
(mg/kg)
5810
6
43.7
7490
26.2
5
17.3
12700
10.5
6000
102
15.2
346
24.8
25.6
J
J
J
J
JB
J
J
J
J
(ug/kg)
6
44
22
J
B
B
GH-SD10-02
EDF12
MEAC12
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
2040 J
3 J
50.1 J
59900 J
6
3.2 JB
14.3
4780 J
6.2
7850
137 J
5.6 J
332 J
557 J
7.7 J
19.4 J
(ug/kg)
39 B
31 B
GH-S011-02
EDF13
ME AC 13
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
5270 J
4.6 J
50.4
.23 J
1.3
56500 J
33.3
9 J
67
19400 J
182
15000
560 J
.15
30.8
572 J
16.6
210 J
(ug/kg)
38 B
22 B
140
GH-SD12-02
EDF14
ME AC 14
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
5080 J
4.1 J
32.9 J
1.2
99300 J
30.3
7.4 J
47.8
12200 J
103
13900
629 J
.13
33.4
618 J
17.5
131 J
(ug/kg)
11 B
1 J
15 B
GH-SD13-02
EDF15
ME AC 15
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
7160 J
6.2 J
44.3 J
.4 J
67500 J
15.9
7.4 J
28.3
17400 J
51.2
26200
391 J
18.6
1350
1.9 J
22.8
62.6 J
(ug/kg)
59 B
110 B
50
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 13
(Page 4 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-SD07-02*
OTR NUMBER: EDF06
ITR NUMBER: MEAC06
DATE SAMPLED: 8-02-89
4, 4' -DDE
4, 4' -DDT
Aroclor-1254
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene and
Benzo tk] f luoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
D i benzo [a , h] anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
I ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
GH-SD07-02 L GH-SD08-02* GH-SD08-02 L GH-SD09-02 GH-FRSD09-02 GH-SD10-02 GH-SD11-02 GH-SD12-02 GH-SD13-02
EDF06 I EDF09 EDF09 L EDF11 EDF10 EDF12 EDF13 EDF14 EDF15
NA MEAC09 NA MEAC11 MEAC10 MEAC12 MEAC13 MEAC14 HEAC15
8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(ug/kg) (mg/kg wet (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
weight)
NA
NA
390 J NA 880 J
NA
NA 57 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 130 J
NA
NA 710 J 77 J 82 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 680 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 160 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 530 J
NA 170 J
FR = Field replicate
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
L = Reanalyzed as low to medium concentration samples
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
DL = Diluted sample
D = Di luted result
23
47 J
44 J
170 J
730 87 J
640 100 J
1300 J 170 J
290 J 87 J
770 860
190 J 50 J
750 98 J
120 J
90 J
68 J
1600 160 J
41 J
280 J 78 J
910 110 J
1000 140 J
(ug/kg)
55 J
53 J
84 J
200 J
48 J
66 J
91 J
52 J
88 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 13
(Page 5 of 6)
SAMPLE :
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
GH-SDK-02
EDF16
MEAC16
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
2960 J
2.1 J
17.5 J
46700 J
7.6
3.8 JB
11
6550 J
47.7
11500
181 J
7.3 J
408 J
363 J
9.3 J
27.4 J
(ug/kg)
29 B
25 B
8
GH-SD15-02
EDF17
MEAC17
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
10900 J
11.9 J
195
.62 J
3.2
68200 J
68.1
13.2 J
111
24400 J
536
24200
778 J
.31
40.3
1660
33.1
372 J
(ug/kg)
34 B
20 B
GH-SD16-02
EDF18
ME AC 18
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
1910 J
2.2 J
17.2 J
.13 J
36800 J
9.6
3 JB
14
5320 J
9.6
11300
163 J
7.6 J
273 J
7.9 J
38.9 J
(ug/kg)
36 B
2 J
24 B
GH-SD17-02
EDF19
HEAC19
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
3990 J
3.9 J
39 J
31600 J
9.3
5.6 JB
14.1
8730 J
11.1
9110
628 J
10.4
396 JB
14
30 J
(ug/kg)
18 B
12 B
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 13
(Page 6 of 6)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Aroclor-1254
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzota] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene and
Benzo [kj f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
D i benzo [a , h] anthracene
Oiethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
GH-S014-02
EDF16
MEAC16
8-02-89
(ug/kg)
68 J
61 J
110 J
47 J
180 J
39 J
74 J
140 J
47 J
89 J
110 J
NOTES:
GH-SD1S-02 GH-SD16-02
EDF17 EDF18
MEAC17 MEAC18
8-02-89 8-02-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
50
75 J 47 J
380 J 150 J
460 150 J
950 J 260 J
350 J 78 J
61 J
1700 400 J
220 J 99 J
590 200 J
150 J
68 J
85 J
930 420 J
320 J 70 J
410 J 200 J
950 400 J
FR = Field replicate
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
L = Reanalyzed as low t
* = High concentration
DL = Diluted sample
0 = Di luted result
GH-SD17-02
EDF19
HEAC19
8-02-89
(ug/kg)
28
180 J
520
usable
o medium cone
sample, resul
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
Page 1 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-AA-C-UWF-01 GH-AA-C-UWB-01 GH-AA-C-TPF-01 GH-AA-C-TPB-01 GH-AA-C-SAF-01 GH-AA-C-SAB-01 GH-AA-C-DFF-01 GH-AA-C-DFB-01
E15 E16 E17 E18 E19 E20 E21 E22
05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89
-- R
-- R
0.4 J
31 J
15.2 BJ
1.3 J
-- R
8.6 BJ
32 BJ
7.6 J
142.1 J
22.8 J
12.7 J
36.5 J
26.4 J
7.1 J
-- R -- R -- R -- R
20.8 J 35.6 J 11.1 J 8.6 J
3.1 BJ 1.9 BJ
2.8 BJ
0.4 BJ 39.6 BJ 115.6 BJ 32.1 BJ
1.8 J 7.6 J
8.1 BJ 57.8 BJ 31.6 BJ 28.4 BJ
2.6 BJ
2.4 BJ
42.1 BJ 48.9 BJ 1.7 BJ 14.2 BJ
1 BJ 8.9 BJ 5.6 BJ
14.2 J 25.8 J 8 J
-- R -- R
36.7 J
2.9 BJ
2.2 J
37.7 BJ 10.1 BJ
1.5 J
43.8 BJ 129.5 BJ
2.7 BJ
1.1 BJ 23 BJ
15.1 BJ
8.6 J
-- R
10.1 J
42.4 BJ
23 BJ
1.9 BJ
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
Page 2 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1 , 2 • D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Ch t orobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ene Chloride
Styrene
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-FROFF-01 GH-AA-C-FROFB-01 GH-AA-C-DRF-01 GH-AA-C-DRB-01 GH-AA-C-FBF-01 GH-AA-C-TBF-01 GH-AA-C-UUF-02 GH-AA-C-UUB-02
E23
05-22-89
-- R
3.7 BJ
371.3 J
209.6 BJ
24.6 BJ
9.6 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E24
05-22-89
-- R
1.9 BJ
26.9 BJ
17.4 BJ
6 BJ
1.2 BJ
4.5 BJ
7.8 BJ
Usable
E25 E26
05-22-89 05-22-89
-- R -- R
0.8 BJ
16.3 BJ
3 BJ
1.5 J
4.5 BJ 2.2 BJ
3.7 BJ 11.3 BJ
11.9 BJ
68.8 BJ 28.8 BJ
3.6 BJ 1.5 BJ
3.5 BJ
26.9 BJ 3.8 BJ
15 J
20 BJ
E27 E28 E43 E44
05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89
-- R -- R -- R -- R
3.8 BJ
1.2 BJ 4.8 B
6.5 J
-- R -- R
2.6 BJ 2.7 B
2.1 BJ 65 J
4 BJ 145 BJ 62.6 BJ 43.5 BJ
2.4 BJ
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
Page 3 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AHBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,H-Dichloroethane
1 , 2 -D i ch I oroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-TPF-02 GH-AA-C-TPB-02 GH-AA-C-FRTPF-02 GH-AA-C-FRTPB-02 GH-AA-C-FRTPB-02RE GH-AA-C-SAF-02 GH-AA-C-SAB-02
E45 £46
05-22-89 05-22-89
-- R -- R
10.1 BJ
-- R -- R
275.3 J 4.3 J
32 BJ 14 BJ
15.7 J
730.3 J 15.7 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B - Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
E47
05-22-89
-- R
11.1 J
-- R
150 BJ
105.6 J
300 J
7.8 J
5.2 J
300 J
E48
05-22-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
2.7 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
16.7 BJ
-- R
11.7 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
E48RE
05-22-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
2.8 J
E49
05-22-89
-- R
-- R
6 BJ
-- R
1.1 BJ
0.7 J
15.2 BJ
-- R
4.1 J
2.4 J
4.7 J
E50
05-22-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
42.4 BJ
36.4 BJ
-- R
-------
06-Har-90
TABLE 14
Page 4 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, ,1-Trichloroethane
, ,2-Trichloroethane
, -Dichloroethane
, -Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-DFF-02 GH-AA-C-DRF-02 GH-AA-C-DRB-02 GH-AA-C-FBF-02 GH-AA-C-TBF-02 GH-AA-C-UUF-03 GH-AA-C-UUB-03 GH-AA-C-TPF-03
E51
05-22-89
-- R
-- R
7.6 B
2 J
-- R
10.8 8J
63.3 BJ
-- R
6.3
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E53
05-22-89
-- R
-- R
2.8 BJ
-- R
11.4 BJ
2.5 J
28.6 BJ
-- R
2 J
3.6 J
Usable
E54 £55 E56 E57 E58 E59
05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89
-- R -- R -- R -- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
4.5 J 7.4 BJ
2 BJ 1.8 BJ 3.3 BJ 2 BJ 7.4 BJ
2.9 J
-- R -- R -- R
4.9 BJ
9 BJ 34.5 BJ 19 BJ 13.6 BJ 6.6 BJ 6.4 BJ
73.9 J
6.2 BJ 25.5 BJ 13.5 BJ 222.2 BJ 19.2 BJ 54.2 BJ
10.8 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
3.7 BJ 251.2 J
4.7 BJ 20.2 J
295.6 J
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
Page 5 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-TPB-03 GH-AA-C-SAF-03 GH-AA-C-SAB-03 GH-AA-C-FRSAF-03 GH-AA-C-FRSAB-03 GH-AA-C-DFF-03 GH-AA-C-DFB-03 GH-AA-C-DRF-03
SAS NUMBER: £60 E61 E62 E63 E64 E65 E66 E67
DATE SAMPLED: 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Oichloroethane
,1-Oichloroethene
, 2-0 i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
-- R -- R -- R
4.2 BJ 3 BJ
1.5 J
4.7 BJ
45.3 BJ 60.9 BJ 91.4 BJ
-- R -- R
36 BJ 132 BJ 34 BJ
12.3 BJ 9.6 BJ
6.9 BJ 13.7 BJ 5.1 BJ
2.5 BJ
31 BJ 8.6 BJ
-- R -- R -- R -- R -- R
52 J
4.5 BJ 3.6 BJ 2.6 BJ 6.1 BJ 1.7 BJ
2.1 J
3.2 BJ 4.2 BJ 3.9 BJ 3.8 BJ
302.2 BJ 230.8 BJ 106.1 BJ 307.3 BJ 10.1 BJ
4.5 BJ -- R -- R 10.6 J 7.2 BJ
170.3 BJ 45.6 BJ 100.6 BJ 55.9 BJ 19.2 BJ
167.6 J 6.7 BJ
13.7 BJ 5.3 BJ 11.7 BJ 24.6 BJ 15.4 BJ
2.9 BJ 4 BJ 4.2 BJ
25.3 J 34.6 J 20.2 BJ
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
Page 6 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2- Tet rach I oroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
, 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-D i ch I oroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Ch I orobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-DRB-03 GH-AA-C-FBF-03 GH-AA-C-TBF-03 GH-AA-C-UWF-04 GH-AA-C-UUB-04 GH-AA-C-FRUWF-04 GH-AA-C-FRUUB-04 GH-AA-C-TPF-04
E68
05-23-89
-- R
2 BJ
96.2 BJ
-- R
38.5 BJ
5.3 BJ
2.2 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E69 E70
05-23-89 05-23-89
-- R -- R
1.6 BJ 2.2 BJ
3.6 BJ 2.3 BJ
3 BJ 145 J
1.6 J -- R
6 BJ 50 BJ
2 BJ 2.1 BJ
4.1 BJ 3.8 BJ
Usable
E99 E100
05-24-89 05-24-89
-- R -- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.6 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
7.1 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R 1.8 BJ
-- R
21.2 BJ 7.6 BJ
3.9 BJ -- R
87 BJ 7.1 BJ
-- R -- R
3.4 BJ
27.2 BJ 2.1 BJ
10.9 J
-- R
31 BJ
E101
05-24-89
-- R
4.3 BJ
56 BJ
-- R
35.8 BJ
-- R
1.9 BJ
14.2 BJ
4.1 BJ
E102 E103
05-24-89 05-24-89
-- R -- R
1.9 J
2.8 J
1.2 BJ 5.5 BJ
2.7 J
5 BJ
51.7 BJ 189.1 BJ
-- R 39.3 BJ
17.7 BJ 194 BJ
-- R -- R
3.1 BJ
1.3 BJ 69.7 BJ
9.5 J
1.1 J
184.1 BJ
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE U
Page 7 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-TPB-04 GH-AA-C-SAF-04 GH-AA-C-SAB-04 GH-AA-C-DFF-04 GH-AA-C-DFB-04 GH-AA-C-DRF-04 GH-AA-C-DRB-04 GH-AA-C-FBF-04
SAS NUMBER: E104 E105 E106 E107 E108 E109 E110 £111
DATE SAMPLED: 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
, 2-D i ch I oroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
-- R
1.3 BJ
-- R
4 BJ
11.4 BJ
6 BJ
3.8 BJ
10.4 BJ
4.7 BJ
19.4 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
3.2 BJ 2 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
2.1 BJ
1.2 BJ 16.4 BJ 9.5 BJ
-- R -- R 5.5 BJ
5 BJ 4.6 BJ 13.6 BJ
1.4 BJ
7.8 BJ 1.6 BJ 16.6 BJ
3 J
10.5 BJ 16.1 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
1.8 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
2.4 BJ 2.2 BJ
3.9 BJ 5 BJ 1.5 BJ
9 BJ 8.1 BJ 2.3 BJ
4.3 BJ 16.7 BJ 1.3 BJ
6 BJ 2 BJ 6.8 BJ
1.7 BJ
5 BJ 19 BJ 1.6 BJ
3.8 J
18.6 BJ 23.5 BJ 8.6 BJ
55 J
2.3 BJ
-- R
8.5 BJ
115 J
46 J
39 J
55 J
27 BJ
105 J
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
Page 8 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1,2 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichtoroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-TBF-04 GH-AA-C-UUF-05 GH-AA-C-UUB-05 GH-AA-C-TPF-OS GH-AA-C-TPB-OS GH-AA-C-SAF-OS GH-AA-C-SAB-05 GH-AA-C-DFF-05
E112
05-24-89
-- R
-- R
12.5 J
-- R
6 BJ
2.6 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
£127
05-25-89
12.8 J
1.3 J
2.6 BJ
5.3 BJ
7.5 BJ
149.8 BJ
5.7 BJ
12.8 BJ
10.6 J
14.5 BJ
Usable
E128 E129
05-25-89 05-25-89
-- R -- R
1.1 J
39.6
1.6 J
1.3 BJ
30.4 BJ 25.3 BJ
35.5 J
11.9 BJ 69.1 BJ
2.1 BJ 3.7 B
4.2 B
1.2 BJ 38.2 B
11.1 J
5.1
156.7 J
E130 E131
05-25-89 05-25-89
-- R -- R
1.8 BJ 1.3 BJ
12 BJ 2.3 BJ
4.2 BJ 12 BJ
9.2 BJ 8.2 BJ
5.5 BJ 2.1 BJ
13.5 BJ
2.5 J
11.5 BJ 44.2 J
E132 E133
05-25-89 05-25-89
-- R 194.7 J
15.3 BJ
15.4 BJ 3.2 BJ
68.4 BJ
11.5 BJ 25.3 BJ
2.5 BJ 126.3 BJ
1.2 BJ 4.7 BJ
8.4 J
7.2 BJ 242.1 BJ
-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
Page 9 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-DFB-05 GH-AA-C-DRF-05 GH-AA-C-ORB-OS GH-AA-C-FRDRF-OS GH-AA-C-FRORB-OS GH-AA-C-FBF-05 GH-AA-C-TBF-OS
SAS NUMBER: E134 E135 E136 E137 E138 E139 EUO
DATE SAMPLED: 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89
(ug/m3)
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane -- R -- R -- R -- R
, ,1-Trichloroethane
, ,2-Trichloroethane
, -Dichloroethane
, -Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene 1.1 J 1.9 J
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene 1 BJ 1.5 BJ
Chloroform
Chloromethane 6.3 BJ 7 BJ 24.8 BJ 56.1 BJ
Ethyl benzene 3.1 J
Hethylene Chloride 6.3 BJ 12.6 BJ 8.1 BJ 32.1 BJ
Styrene 2.8 B 3 B 1.7 BJ
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene 5.6 BJ 4.8 B 3.7 BJ
Trichloroethene 1.5 J 1.4 J
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total) 7.4 B 3.2 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
1.7 J
102 BJ 8 BJ 20.5 J
9.7 BJ 8 BJ 19 BJ
1.3 BJ
2.2 BJ 11 J
1.6 J
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 1 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
Rl PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAHPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,1-Trichl oroet hane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trich I oroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-UWF-01 GH-AA-T-UUB-01 GH-AA-T-TPF-01 GH-AA-T-TPB-01 GH-AA-T-SAF-01 GH-AA-T-SAB-01 GH-AA-T-DFF-01 GH-AA-T-DFB-01
E01
05-22-89
7 B
18.6 J
3.1 J
4.5 B
4.4
0.8
0.7
0.8 B
3.1
45.2
1.9
21.6
31.7
12.1
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
E02
05-22-89
2.7 B
3 BJ
6.5 B
0.2 J
0.4 B
2.8 B
0.7 B
0.6 B
£03
05-22-89
4.4 8
0.4 J
5.3 BJ
4.5 B
2.7
0.4
0.4
0.6 B
1.8
23
1
11.2
9.6
7
E04 £05
05-22-89 05-22-89
3.8 B 10.2 B
0.2 J
2 BJ 2 BJ
4.1 B 3.4 B
0.5
0.6
0.4 B
0.3 JB
4.4 B 38.9
1.1 0.8 BJ
2.1
0.5 B 16
£06
05-22-89
2 B
2 BJ
2.2 B
0.1 J
0.3 B
3.9 B
1.3 J
0.2 JB
£07
05-22-89
7.3 B
0.2 J
4.6 BJ
12 B
3.3 J
1.9 J
0.5 B
0.5 B
113.3 J
0.7
8.7 J
18
2.1 B
EOS
05-22-89
7.3 B
2.9 BJ
4.3 B
1.3 J
0.3 J
16.7 J
2.1 J
0.4 B
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data
Not Usable
-------
07-Har-90
TABLE 15
Page 2 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-FRDFF-01 GH-AA-T-FRDFB-01 GH-AA-T-DRF-01 GH-AA-T-DRB-01 GH-AA-T-FRDRF-01 GH-AA-T-FRDRB-01 GH-AA-T-FBF-01
E09
05-22-89
4.7 B
5.6 BJ
4.3 B
2 J
0.3 J
0.3 J
0.6 B
1 B
22.2 J
0.7 J
11.8 J
15.3
4.5 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E10
05-22-89
5.6 B
5.8 B
0.3 J
0.2 J
36.8 J
0.3 J
2.8 J
1.8 J
0.8 B
Usable
E11A
05-22-89
4.6 B
4.9 BJ
6.5 B
2.8 J
0.7 J
0.4
0.2 JB
42 J
0.4 J
5.3 J
7.7 J
0.5 B
E12A
05-22-89
4.5 B
2 BJ
3 B
1.1 J
0.6 J
0.3 B
71 J
0.3 B
E11B
05-22-89
2.3 B
0.8
5.7 BJ
7.6 B
3.1
2.2 J
0.4
0.5 B
0.7 B
152.9 J
1.1 J
12.7 J
33.1 J
2.5 B
E12B
05-22-89
1.3 B
1.6 BJ
4.8 B
0.1 J
1.9 J
159.2 J
1 B
0.4 B
E13
05-22-89
2.5
1 BJ
1.2 B
0.4 B
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 3 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-TBF-01 GH-AA-T-UUF-02 GH-AA-T-UUB-02 GH-AA-T-TPF-02 GH-AA-T-TPB-02 GH-AA-T-FRTPF-02 GH-AA-T-FRTPB-02 GH-AA-T-SAF-02
SAS NUMBER: E14 E29 E30 E31 E32 E33 E34 E3S
DATE SAMPLED: 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Bisulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
5.5 2.7 B
1.5 BJ
1.8 B 3.8 B
0.9 B
0.7
0.3
0.4 B 0.4 B
0.4 B
0.9 B 45.2 J
0.2 J
0.1 J 4.2
9.6
2.2 B
2.1 B 2.7 B 1.9 B
0.8
4 BJ
13.9 J 6.9 B
6.9
2 J
0.3 B 0.4 B
323.7 0.3 B
16 J 75.1 J 13.9 J
46.2
0.1 J 8.1
0.7 B 867.1 1.5 B
2.1 B
1
6 BJ
4.5 B
7.5
1.3 J
318.4
48.3 J
49.3
7
845.8
0.8 B 2.5 B
1.3 BJ
4.5 B 2.9 B
0.1 BJ 0.7 B
0.2 J 0.5
0.4
0.3 B 3.6
2.9 B 31.9
8.5
2.9
9.5 J 21.3
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
07-Har-90
TABLE 15
Page 4 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
Rl PHASE 111 EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 5 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESyLTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-UWB-03 GH-AA-T-FRUUF-03 GH-AA-T-FRUUB-03 GH-AA-T-TPF-03 GH-AA-T-TPB-03 GH-AA-T-SAF-03 GH-AA-T-SAB-03
SAS NUMBER: E72A E71B E72B E73 E74 E75 E76
DATE SAMPLED: 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89
(ug/m3)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.6 B
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone 1.5 B
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone 5.8 B
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide 0.9 J
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride 142 J
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total) 0.8 J
178.8 J
3.7 B
3.6 B
1.4 J
4 J
0.6 J
201.1 J
1.3 J
6.7 J
19 J
2.8
3.1 B
4.7
1.5 B 67 1.8 B
2.4 B 3 B 3.6 B
7.3
0.6
0.2 J 12.3
24.6 J 29.1 J 27.4 J
106.1
11.2 J 18.4
0.5 B 36.3 0.7
1.8 B
1 B
2.5 B
1 J
0.2 J
0.4
0.3 J
0.2 J
13.9 J
7.2 J
2.5 J
0.8 J
0.7 B
-- R
2.6 B
0.5 J
0.2 J
18 J
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 6 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-FRSAF-03 GH-AA-T-FRSAB-03 GH-AA-T-DFF-03 GH-AA-T-OFB-03 GH-AA-T-DRF-03 GH-AA-T-DRB-03 GH-AA-T-FBF-03 GH-AA-T-TBF-03
SAS NUMBER: E77 E78 E79 E80 E81 E82 E83 E84
DATE SAMPLED: 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89
(ug/m3)
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Oisulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xytene (total)
1.6 B
2.5 BJ
3.3 B
1
0.7 J
0.4
41.5 J
6.6 J
0.7 B
-- R -- R
4.6 B 4.3 B
1.1 J
0.3 J 0.6 J
1 J
0.3
30.1 J 18.6 J
4.5
3.3
1.1
0.6 B 1.3 B
-- R 6.9 BJ
3.4 B 5.2 B
0.5 J 2.1
0.2 J 1.2
0.2 J
0.7
17.6 J 63.8 J
8.5
8
3.4
0.5 B 1.9
-- R -- R
4.7 B 1.1 B
0.4
0.2 J
0.2 J
20.7 J 0.5 B
0.4
0.2 BJ 0.1 J
1.9
2.4 J
1.9 B
0.5 B
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 7 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
Rl PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-UWB-04 GH-AA-T-FRUUF-04 GH-AA-T-FRUUB-04 GH-AA-T-TPF-04 GH-AA-T-TPB-04 GH-AA-T-SAF-04 GH-AA-T-SAB-04 GH-AA-T-DFF-04
E86
05-24-89
-- R
3.7 B
0.2 J
11.6 J
2.4 B
0.1 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E87
05-24-89
3.3 B
4.2 J
4.1 B
5.9
0.5 B
0.4
2.2
29.4
3.1
16.3
7.7
0.4
11.3
Usable
E86 E89
05-24-89 05-24-89
1.1 B 3.7 B
0.3
2.9
2 J 10.9 BJ
3.8 B 10 BJ
11.8
0.5 B
3
3.7
17.3
5.4 B 20.5 J
3.9
39.5
8.6
63.6
E90 E91
05-24-89 05-24-89
0.5 B 3.1 B
-- R 5.9 BJ
6.4 BJ 9.9 BJ
0.5 5.9
0.5 B
0.4
0.4
0.2 5.9
10.5 J 33.2 J
2.8
22.3
8.9
1.6 27.2
E92 E93
05-24-89 05-24-89
0.7 B 2.6 B
2.5 BJ 4.5 BJ
7.9 BJ 8.1 BJ
5.7
0.2 B 1 B
0.4
0.3
0.9
23.3 J 52.4
2.7
12.4
6.2
3.5
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 8 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
Rl PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 9 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-TPB-05 GH-AA-T-SAF-05 GH-AA-T-SAB-05 GH-AA-T-DFF-05 GH-AA-T-DFB-05 GH-AA-T-FRDFF-05 GH-AA-T-FRDFB-05 GH-AA-T-DRF-05
E116 E117 E118 E119A E120A E119B E120B E121
05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89
0.9 B
4.3
3.6 BJ
9.7 BJ
0.2 BJ
2.7 B
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
1 B
3.5 BJ
6.3 BJ
1 B
1.1 B
0.3
8.4
57.9
0.6
17.4
10.5
40
Usable
0
5.2 BJ 5
0
0
0
0
.8
.6
.9
.4
.4
.9
3.6 B 23
0
5
4
.8
.6
3
.2
B
BJ 4 BJ
B 0.1 BJ
B
1 J
B
J 5.6 B
J
J
B 0.3 B
1
5
1
0
0
0
54
8
9
4
.5
.4
.7
.9
.4
.2
1
1
.5
1
.4
.9
.8
B
BJ
J
B
J
J
B
J
J
J
B
1
5.4 BJ 4
0.1 BJ 2
1
0
0
0
6.4 J 71
7
10
4
.5
.4
.3
.5
.4
.3
.9
.8
1
.7
.5
.6
B
BJ
J
J
B
B
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
Page 10 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-DRB-05 GH
SAS NUMBER: E122
DATE SAMPLED: 05-25-89
(ug/ni5)
1,1,1-Trichtoroethane 10.5 B
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-Pentanone
Acetone 4.6 BJ
Benzene 0.4 B
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride 2.4 B
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
-AA-T-FRDRF-05 GH-AA-T-FRDRB-05 GH-AA-T-FBF-05 GH-AA-T-TBF-05
E123 E124 E125 E126
05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89
1.9 B
7.4 BJ
2.2
4.4 J
0.4
0.7 B
91.4
1
8
12.6
3.4 B
1.1 B 0.5 2.8
13.7 BJ 3.1 BJ 2.6 B
25.1 BJ 2.3 BJ 2.3 B
0.4 B 0.2 J
0.2 J
0.3
11.4 J 0.4 B 0.6 B
0.4
1.2
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 16 Page 1 of 2
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (PUFF)
RI PHASE III ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-P-UW-01
SAS NUMBER: E01
DATE SAMPLED: 05-31-89
(ug/m3)
Bis(2-ethylhexyl )phthalate
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aroclor-1016
Aroclor-1221
Aroclor-1232
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta BHC
Chlordane (total)
Delta BHC
Dieldrin
Endosutfan 1
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Endrin Ketone
Gamma BHC (lindane)
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
GH-AA-P-SA-01 GH-AA-P-AL-01 GH-AA-P-BH-01 GH-AA-P-FB-01 GH-AA-P-UW-02
E02 E03 E04 EOS E06
05-31-89 05-31-89 05-31-89 05-31-89 06-01-89
93.9 JB
46.9 JB
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
NOTES: B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 16 Page 2 of 2
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (PUFF)
RI PHASE III ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-P-SA-02 GH-AA-P-AL-02 GH-AA-P-FRAL-02 GH-AA-P-BH-02
SAS NUMBER: E07 £08 E09 E10
DATE SAMPLED: 06-01-89 06-01-89 06-01-89 06-01-89
(ug/m3)
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 127.7 JB
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-ODD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DOT
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aroclor-1016
Aroctor-1221
Aroclor-1232
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta BHC
Chlordane (total)
Delta BHC
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Endrin Ketone
Gamma BHC (lindane)
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
NOTES: B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 1 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-UUF-06 GH-AA-C-UUB-06 GH-AA-C-TPF-06 GH-AA-C-TPB-06 GH-AA-C-SAF-06 GH-AA-C-SAB-06 GH-AA-C-FRSAF-06
SAS NUMBER: E15 E16 E21 E22 E17 E18 E19
DATE SAMPLED: 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chtorome thane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
-- R -- R -- R
0.1 J 0.04 j
0.7 J
0.02 J
1.3 J
15.2 J 1.1 BJ 0.8 BJ
2 BJ -- R 1.7 BJ
8.3 BJ 9.1 BJ 3.2 BJ
2.8 BJ
0.5 BJ
2.4 BJ 0.2 BJ 12.8
0.1 BJ
2 BJ 0.9 BJ
-- R -- R
0.7 J
1.6 J
0.4 J
0.5 J 5.2 J
0.6 J
7.9 J
0.4 BJ 1.2 BJ -- R
49.8 BJ 4.9 BJ 71.2 BJ
1 BJ 0.6 BJ
0.2 BJ
0.5 BJ 8.2 J 1.1 BJ
0.2 J
0.4 BJ 1.1 BJ
-- R
0.2 J
0.2 J
0.6 BJ
1.2 BJ
34 BJ
0.5 BJ
0.3 BJ
5.6 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.9 BJ
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 2 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-FRSAB-06 GH-AA-C-OFB-06 GH-AA-C-DRF-06 GH-AA-C-DRB-06 GH-AA-C-FBF-06 GH-AA-C-TBF-06 GH-AA-C-UWF-07
SAS NUMBER: E20 E24 £25 E26 E27 E28 E43
DATE SAMPLED: 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-08-89
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Oichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
-- R
0.4 J
2.2 J
0.3 J
20.4 J 195.6 J 255.7 J
-- R 0.3 BJ 0.4 BJ
26 BJ 12.5 BJ 45.3 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.2 BJ
0.2 J
0.3 BJ 0.4 BJ 12.9 J
0.2 BJ 0.2 BJ
0.8 BJ
7.1 J
0.6 BJ
27.8 J
0.3 BJ
19.4 BJ
0.4 BJ
0.2 J
0.7 BJ
0.2 J
0.2 BJ
-- R
0.4 J
1.4 J
1 J
0.3 J
231.2 BJ
0.1 BJ 0.04 BJ 1.3 J
3 J 54.2 J 132.9 BJ
0.1 BJ 0.2 BJ 3.5 BJ
0.3 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.4 BJ 15.6 J
0.3 J
0.1 BJ 2.1 BJ
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 3 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
Rl PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-UWB-07 GH-AA-C-TPF-07 GH-AA-C-TPB-07 GH-AA-C-SAF-07 GH-AA-C-SAB-07 GH-AA-C-DFF-07 GH-AA-C-DFB-07
SAS NUMBER: E44 E47 E48 E45 E46 £49 E50
DATE SAMPLED: 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-0 i ch I oroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
-- R -- R
0.1 J
1.7 BJ
0.1 J
5.9 BJ
0.5 J 0.4 J
92.5 BJ 24.2 BJ
1 BJ 0.3 BJ
0.1 BJ
1.7 BJ 3.4 BJ
0.1 J
0.7 BJ 0.4 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
0.1 J
4.3 BJ 1.4 BJ
0.1 J 0.1 J
0.04 J
62.5 BJ 2.6 BJ 48.9 BJ
0.9 J
32.8 BJ 12 BJ 44 BJ
0.5 BJ 0.5 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.5 BJ 75.6 J 5.8 BJ
0.1 J 0.1 J
0.3 BJ 0.9 BJ 0.4 BJ
-- R
0.3 J
1.7 BJ
0.3 J
0.1 J
3.6 BJ
0.7 J
34.7 BJ
0.7 BJ
0.1 BJ
4 BJ
1.5 BJ
-- R
12.8 BJ
21.9 BJ
0.3 BJ
0.2 BJ
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 4 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-FRDFF-07 GH-AA-C-FRDFB-07
E51 E52
08-08-89 08-08-89
0.1 J
2.3 BJ
0.1 J 0.1 J
-- R -- R
8.1 J
59.9 BJ
0.6 J 0.3 J
9.9 BJ 14.1 BJ
0.7 BJ 11.6 J
0.6 J
8.1 J 0.7 BJ
0.1 J
0.6 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
GH-AA-C-DRF-07
E53
08-08-89
0.6 J
9 BJ
0.2 J
-- R
18.8 BJ
1 J
38.9 BJ
31.6 J
4.7 BJ
GH-AA-C-DRB-07 GH-AA-C-FBF-07 GH-AA-C-TBF-07 GH-AA-C-UUF-08
E54 E55 E56 E71
08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-09-89
-- R
0.5 J
0.5 J
0.4 J
-- R -- R -- R
0.6 J 0.4 BJ
47 BJ 8.3 BJ 50 J 8 BJ
0.7 J
2.9 BJ 5 BJ 17.1 BJ 52.9 J
1.5 J 0.4 J 0.8 BJ
0.3 J
0.4 BJ 0.3 BJ 8.3 J
0.5 J
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 5 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
Rl PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-UUB-08 GH-AA
E72
08-09-89
-- R
29.9 J
0.5 J
10.3 BJ
0.6 BJ
2.1 BJ
0.5 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
•C-TPF-08 GH-AA-C-TPB-08 GH-AA-C-FRTPF-08 GH-AA-C-FRTPB-08 GH-AA-C-SAF-08 GH-AA-C-SAB-08
E75 E76
08-09-89 08-09-89
-- R -- R
1 J
3.1 J 3.2 J
0.3 J
-- R
0.2 BJ
5.8 BJ
1 BJ 0.3 BJ
50 BJ 1.7 BJ
0.6 BJ 1 BJ
1.7 BJ
11.7 J 0.3 BJ
0.1 J
1.1 BJ
Usable
E77
08-09-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
E78 E73
08-09-89 08-09-89
-- R -- R
4.6 J
73.1 J
3.8 J
1.5 J
-- R
35.3 J
2.6 BJ
14.5 BJ 200.9 J
1.4 BJ 3.9 BJ
2.7 BJ
0.5 BJ 12.3 J
0.7 BJ
3.1 BJ
E74
08-09-89
-- R
30.1 J
-- R
146.1 J
1.8 BJ
0.5 BJ
0.5 BJ
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 6 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
-------
07-Har-90
TABLE 17
Page 7 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Oichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-TPF-09 GH-AA-C-TPB-09 GH-AA-C-SAF-09 GH-AA-C-SAB-09 GH-AA-C-DFF-09 GH-AA-C-DFB-09 GH-AA-C-DRF-09 GH-AA-C-DRB-09
E103
08-10-89
-- R
0.3 J
0.2 BJ
13.7 J
3.4 J
23.6 BJ
15.5 J
0.4 J
2.7 BJ
0.2 BJ
8.2 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E104
08-10-89
-- R
0.2 J
0.6 BJ
3 J
13.7 BJ
4.7 J
1.6 BJ
0.2 BJ
6.9 J
Usable
E101
08-10-89
0.6 J
2.8 J
0.2 J
0.7 J
24.4 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.6 J
9.2 J
0.2 BJ
0.4 BJ
E102 E105
08-10-89 08-10-89
-- R
4.3 J
0.2 BJ
0.1 J
1.4 BJ
0.1 J
8.8 BJ 4.1 BJ
4.4 J
0.7 J
0.9 BJ 2.7 BJ
0.3 BJ
1 BJ
E106
08-10-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.1 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
31.4 J
-- R
40.8 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.2 BJ
-- R
-- R
E107
08-10-89
•-- R
0.2 BJ
20.5 J
8.6 J
1.3 J
25.9 BJ
0.2 BJ
0.4 J
5.4 J
0.8 BJ
E108
08-10-89
-- R
0.5 J
27 J
25.9 BJ
1.2 BJ
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 8 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1. ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-0 i ch I oroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chtorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-FRDRF-09 GH-AA-C-FRDRB-09 GH-AA-C-FBF-09 GH-AA-C-TBF-09 GH-AA-C-UWF-10 GH-AA-C-UUB-10 GH-AA-C-FRUWF-10
E109 E110
08-10-89 08-10-89
37.2 J
0.03 BJ
4.4 J 1.9 J
1.6 J
0.1 J
7 BJ 10.7 BJ
8.8 J 1.1 BJ
0.4 BJ 0.3 BJ
1.1 BJ
6 J 0.5 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E111 E112 E127 E128
08-10-89 08-10-89 08-11-89 08-11-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.1 J
-- R
-- R
-- R 0.9 BJ*
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R 1.3 BJ* 5.4 BJ*
-- R 0.3 J*
1.2 J 13.8 J 7.5 BJ* 7.9 BJ*
0.3 J 0.4 BJ* 0.2 BJ*
-- R
0.3 BJ 0.3 BJ 1 BJ* 0.2 BJ*
0.2 BJ 0.1 BJ*
-- R
-- R 0.4 J 0.5 J*
E129
08-11-89
0.2 J
0.1 BJ
10.7 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.3 J
1.2 BJ
0.1 BJ
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
Page 9 of 9
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
, 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
, 1 -D i ch I oroethane
, 1 -0 i ch I oroet hene
,2-Dich I oroethane
, 2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach 1 oroet hene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-C-TPF-10 GH-AA-C-SAF-10 GH-AA-C-SAB-10 GH-AA-C-DFF-10 GH-AA-C-DFB-10 GH-AA-C-DRF-10 GH-AA-C-DRB-10 GH-AA-C-TBF-10
E133 E131
08-11-89 08-11-89
-- R
1.4 BJ
1.1 J 0.3 J
3.9 J
1 J
0.4 J
11.3 BJ 2.1 BJ
2.8 J
45.2 BJ 7 BJ
7.7 BJ
0.9 BJ
4.5 BJ 5.2 BJ
7.2 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
E132 E135 E136
08-11-89 08-11-89 08-11-89
-- R
0.6 J
0.6 BJ
0.2 J
0.5 J 0.4 J
0.6 BJ 4.4 BJ 4.2 BJ
0.2 J 0.8 J
1.7 BJ 2.5 BJ 28.8 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.9 BJ 2.3 BJ
0.6 BJ
0.2 BJ 0.8 BJ 6.2 BJ
0.4 J
0.2 J
E137
08-11-89
-- R
0.2 BJ
0.1 J
0.3 BJ
0.7 J
2.5 BJ
0.4 BJ
0.5 BJ
7.3 J
0.2 J
0.7 BJ
E138 E140
08-11-89 08-11-89
-- R -- R
23.3 J
0.2 BJ 7.1 BJ
0.5 J
2.3 BJ 19.2 BJ
1.2 BJ 2.3 BJ
4.6 BJ 0.7 J
0.2 J
1.6 BJ
= Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 1 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
, 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
. 2 - D i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch t oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulf ide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-UUF-06 GH-AA-T-UWB-06 GH-AA-T-TPF-06 GH-AA-T-TPB-06 GH-AA-T-SAF-06 GH-AA-T-SAB-06 GH-AA-T-FRSAF-06
E01 E02
08-07-89 08-07-89
0.9 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R
1.9 J
0.8 J 0.1 BJ
0.7 J
15.2 J
1.5 J
26.3 J 10.6 BJ
15.7 J
0.2 J
6.5 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E07
08-07-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.7 J
4.3 J
1.5 J
3.4 J
9.5 J
0.4 J
31.2 J
0.4 J
5.6 J
1.8 J
E08 E03 E04
08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89
0.6 J
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
0.2 J 1.7 J 0.4 J
0.7 J 0.4 J
0.5 J
5.8 J 10.6 J
0.8 J
1.9 BJ 18.2 BJ 2.9 BJ
16.1 J
0.1 J
1.5 J
EOS
08-07-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.4 J
0.8 J
0.1 J
0.9 J
55.1 J
0.2 J
18.2 J
1.1 J
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 18 Page 2 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-FRSAB-06 GH-AA-T-DFF-06 GH-AA-T-DFB-06 GH-AA-T-DRF-06 GH-AA-T-DRB-06 GH-AA-T-FBF-06 GH-AA-T-TBF-06
SAS NUMBER: E06 E09 E10 Ell E12 £13 E14
DATE SAMPLED: 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
, 1 -D i ch I oroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromod i ch I oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
1.5 J
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
0.6 J 0.3 J
0.1 BJ 0.2 BJ
0.9 J
1 J
7.7 BJ 16.5 BJ
0.2 BJ
10.8 J 0.6 J
0.4 J 0.6 J
4.6 J
1.2 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.5 J 0.1 J
0.2 BJ 0.3 J
1 J
10.4 J
0.6 J
18.7 BJ 5.6 BJ
0.2 BJ
8 J
0.2 J
2.5 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.1 BJ
0.04 BJ
2 J
0.3 BJ
0.1 BJ
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 3 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
Rl PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Oichloroethene
1 , 2 - D i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch loromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-UUF-07 GH-AA-T-UWB-07 GH-AA-T-TPF-07 GH-AA-T-TPB-07 GH-AA-T-SAF-07 GH-AA-T-SAB-07 GH-AA-T-DFF-07
E29 E30
08-08-89 08-08-89
0.6 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.7 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.5 BJ
0.3
0.5 J
13.6 J 3.5 J
7.4 J
2.7 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E33 E34 E31
08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89
•#
1.3 J 1.2 J
k
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
0.6 BJ 0.2 BJ 1.2 J
0.6 J
0.3 BJ 0.2 BJ 5.2 BJ
0.6 0.4 J
0.1 J
0.1 J
0.4 J 1.5 J
15.5 J 16 J 9.7 J
6.3 J
0.2 J 0.2 J
8 J 30.6 J
0.1 J
1.8 J
2.1 BJ 15.3 J
E32 E35
08-08-89 08-08-89
1.2 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.5 BJ
0.6 J
4.9 BJ 0.3 BJ
0.6 J
2.7 J
0.7 J
16.2 J
5.6 J
0.2 J
0.2 J 9.8 J
0.5 J
6 J 4.8 J
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 4 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
. 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
, 2 -0 i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch I oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-DFB-07 GH-AA-T-FRDFF-07 GH-AA-T-FRDFB-07 GH-AA-T-ORF-07 GH-AA-T-DRB-07 GH-AA-T-FBF-07 GH-AA-T-TBF-07
E36 E37
08-08-89 08-08-89
1.1 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-• R -- R
0.2 BJ 0.6 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.2 BJ
0.6
0.3 J
14.7 J 11.4 J
0.1 J
5.2 J
2.1 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E38 £39
08-08-89 08-08-89
1.1 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
•- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.6 BJ
0.2 BJ 0.3 BJ
0.5 J
0.8 J
1.9 J 15.9 J
0.7 BJ
0.1 J
0.4 J 5.9 J
5 J
E40 E41 £42
08-08-89 08-08-89 08-06-89
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
0.5 BJ
3.3 J
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 5 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
Rl PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-UUF-08 GH-AA-T-UUB-08 GH-AA-T-TPF-08 GH-AA-T-TPB-08 GH-AA-T-FRTPF-08 GH-AA-T-FRTPB-08 GH-AA-T-SAF-08
SAS NUMBER: E57 £58 E61 E62 E63 E64 E59
DATE SAMPLED: 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1.1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Oichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch 1 oromethane
Brcxnoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
-- R
4.8 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
4.1 J
1.4 J
2.3 J
11.5 BJ
4.8 J
28.2 J
1 J
11 J
-- R -- R -- R
1 J
0.5 J
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
3.5 J
0.9 J
0.6 J
0.3 B
1.7 J
13.2 BJ 5.4 BJ
1.7 J
9.9 J
0.7 J
9.1 J
2.2 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.7 J
0.6 J
8.6 BJ
0.8 BJ
2.5 J
6.1 J
0.5 J
0.6 BJ
-- R
4.5 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
3.9 J
1.9 J
1.2 J
10.6 J
0.8 BJ 205.9 J
0.2 BJ 1.4 BJ
4.8 J
35.9 J
1.3 J
1.3 BJ 58.2 J
NOTES: FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 6 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 7 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE 111 EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-AA-T-UUF-09
ESS
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-UUB-09
E86
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-TPF-09
E89
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-TPB-09
E90
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-SAF-09
E87
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-SAB-09
£88
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-DFF-09
E91
08-10-89
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 8 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-D i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch 1 oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch loromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-DFB-09 GH-AA-T-DRF-09 GH-AA-T-DRB-09 GH-AA-T-FRDRF-09 GH-AA-T-FRDRB-09 GH-AA-T-FBF-09 GH-AA-T-TBF-09
E92
08-10-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.3 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E93 E94
08-10-89 08-10-89
1.9 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
2.9 J
0.2 J
0.7 J
0.1 J
2.3 BJ
15 BJ 3.5 BJ
1.5 J
13.3 BJ
0.2 BJ
12.9 BJ
Usable
E95
08-10-89
2 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
3 J
0.7 J
2.1 BJ
105 BJ
1.3 J
14.6 BJ
.3 BJ
12.3 BJ
E96 E97
08-10-89 08-10-89
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.4
0.5 J
1.6 BJ 17.5 J
3.3 J
0.2 J
3 J
E98
08-10-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.5 J
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 9 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-AA-T-UUF-10
E113
08-11-89
GH-AA-T-UWB-10
E1U
08-11-89
GH-AA-T-FRUUF-10
E115
08-11-89
GH-AA-T-FRUWB-10
E116
08-11-89
GH-AA-T-TPF-10
£119
08-11-89
GH-AA-T-TPB-10
E120
08-11-89
GH-AA-T-SAF-10
E117
08-11-89
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
BromodichIoromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chioromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromochIoromethane
0.5 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.7 J*
1.5 J*
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.8 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.8 J
0.6 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.3 J
0.4 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.5 J
0.2 J
0.3 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.04 J
1.9 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.6 J
0.8 J
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
FR =
FB =
TB =
B =
J =
R =
* -
1.3 BJ*
220.8 J* 4.6 BJ*
0.1 J*
10.4 BJ* 0.1 BJ*
0.3 J*
7.9 BJ*
Field Replicate
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Blank Contamination
Estimated Value
Laboratory Data Not Usable
Estimated Sample Volume
1.8 BJ
14 BJ
0.8 J
15.7 BJ
0.3 J
7 BJ
0.5 BJ
3.1 BJ 25 BJ
0.2 J
5.6 BJ
0.1 J
3.1 BJ
1.5 BJ
1.8 BJ 12.7 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.6 J
1.5 BJ 16.6 BJ
6.7 BJ
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
Page 10 of 10
G&H LANDFILL
AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/niJ)
, 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
, 1 -D i ch loroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
, 2-0 i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachtoride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromet hane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach loroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:
GH-AA-T-SAB-10 GH-AA-T-DFF-10 GH-AA-T-DFB-10 GM-AA-T-DRF-10 GH-AA-T-DRB-10 GH-AA-T-FBF-10 GH-AA-T-TBF-10
E118
08-11-89
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.1 J
3.5 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E121
08-11-89
2.2 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.8 J
0.3 J
0.8 J
1.2 J
10.2 BJ
1 J
17.4 BJ
0.3 J
5.7 J
Usable
E122 E123
08-11-89 08-11-89
0.3 BJ 2.1 BJ
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.8 J 3.9 J
0.7 J
1.9 J
12 BJ
0.8 J
4.5 BJ 18 BJ
0.3 J
10.8 J
E124
08-11-89
1.6 J
4.4 J
3.7 J
0.8 J
3.9 J
0.3 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.2 J
0.1 J
14.4 J
72 J
264 J
480 J
0.2 J
0.2 J
0.7 J
320 J
0.6 BJ
8 J
33.6 BJ
27.2 J
3 J
E125 E126
08-11-89 08-11-89
0.8 J
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-• R -- R
-- R -- R
3.6 J
10.8 J
* = Estimated Sample Volume
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 1 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 . 1 ,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1, 2- Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyt-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3-D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH01A-03 GH-GWGH01B-03
EEY61 EEY62
MEBF61 MEBF62
10-18-89 10-17-89
142 JB
39.5 J 13.4
190 J 246
122000 74500
6930 J 783
2.8 JB
32900 23900
120 26
23300 2880 J
44300 15800
-- R
780 570 J
3 J
4 JB
GH-GUGH02A-03
EEY39
MEBF39
10-18-89
34.6 J
383
85000
5.4 J
17.4 JB
6410 J
32700
97.7
42 B
42200
80400
-- R
256
12
1 JB
GH-GUGH03B-03
EEYOO
MEBFOO
10-19-89
15.3 J
658
109000
4220 J
58600
60.4
29.6 JB
19600
87600
-- R
25.8 B
640
7 JB
300
GH-GUGH03C-03 GH-GUGH04B-03
EEY01 EEY32
MEBF01 MEBF32
10-19-89 10-19-89
4240
6.6 J 15.1 J
83.6 J 226
19200 42000
13.4
13.7 JB 9.4 JB
6960 J 16.1 JB
3.9 JB
7060 39000
93.7 12.4 J
85.3 B
2410 J 4670 J
18300 53500
-- R -- R
13.6 J
75.3 86.4
-- R
8 JB
GH-GUGH08B-03 GH-GUGH09A-03
EEY02 EEY03
MEBF02 MEBF03
10-17-89 10-16-89
9.2 JB
2.3 JB 32.8
68.4 J 328
5.1 B
90600 93200
53.8 JB 2970
2.6 JB
25600 39800
232 393
20.4 J
2160 JB 36900
87200 81600
4.5 JB 3.9 JB
18.4 JB 10.8 JB
2 J
3 J
1 J
1 JB
3 JB
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 19 Page 2 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH01A-03 GH-GWGH01B-03 GH-GUGH02A-03 GH-GUGH03B-03 GH-GUGH03C-03 GH-GWGH04B-03 GH-GUGH08B-03 GH-GUGH09A-03
OTR NUMBER: EEY61 EEY62 EEY39 EEYOO EEY01 EEY32 EEY02 EEY03
ITR NUMBER: MEBF61 MEBF62 MEBF39 MEBFOO MEBF01 MEBF32 HEBF02 MEBF03
DATE SAMPLED: 10-18-89 10-17-89 10-18-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-17-89 10-16-89
___
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-d i chIorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-noethy (naphthalene
2-methyI phenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol 11 J
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid 2 J
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 7 J 3 J
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
D i benzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate 2 J
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol 3 J 3 J
Aroclor-1260
4.4'-ODD
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 3 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 - D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GWGH09B-03
EEY04
MEBF04
10-16-89
34.6
301
79800
2SOO
45700
239
33200
84500
3.8 JB
16.5 JB
1 JB
GH-GUGH12A-03
EEY40
MEBF40
10-18-89
35.9 J
230
121000
12800 J
36400
205
13500
55100
-- R
14.6 JB
4 J
10
1 J
GH-FRGUGH12A-03
EEY74
MEBF74
10-18-89
32.2 J
241
124000
13000 J
37300
214
13900
55800
-- R
12.5 JB
4 J
10
GH-GUGH14A-03
EEY05
MEBF05
10-16-89
15.3 JB
1 JB
25.6 J
81800
3.3 JB
41.9 JB
16100
12.2 J
16.6 J
1680 JB
111000
3.8 JB
6.8 JB
GH-GUGH15B-03
EEY06
MEBF06
10-16-89
13.3 JB
3.4 JB
138 J
79700
5.7 J
24.7 JB
22400
64.2
1650 JB
27200
3.5 JB
GH-GUGH15C-03
EEY07
MEBF07
10-16-89
23.4 JB
10.9
40 J
13400
29.6
1.7 JB
114 B
10000
2.6 JB
26.4 J
6200
65100
2.9 JB
3.1 JB
GH-GUGH19B-03 GH-GUGH22A-03
EEY08 EEY63
MEBF08 HEBF63
10-16-89 10-18-89
3.8 JB
71.2 J 132 J
69700 98500
18.4 JB 76.9 JB
18200 39300
154 84.4
1620 JB 3680 J
21500 59300
-- R
3.7 JB
23.8 B 49.4
2 J
3 J
1 JB
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 4 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH09B-03 GH-GUGH12A-03 GH-FRGUGH12A-03 GH-GUGHUA-03 GH-GUGH15B-03 GH-GWGH15C-03 GH-GUGH19B-03 GH-GWGH22A-03
OTR NUMBER: EEY04 EEY40 EEY74 EEY05 EEY06 EEY07 EEY08 EEY63
ITR NUMBER: MEBF04 MEBF40 MEBF74 MEBF05 MEBF06 MEBF07 MEBF08 MEBF63
DATE SAMPLED: 10-16-89 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-16-89 10-16-89 10-16-89 10-16-89 10-18-89
_____
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-di chlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyt) ether 1 J
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate 2 J 2 J 1 J
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol 2 J
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 5 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 , 2, 2- Tet rach I oroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chi oroethane
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH22B-03 GH-GUGH24A-03 GH-GWGH24A-03 RE GH-GUGH26A-03
EEY64 EEY41 EEY41RE EEY42
MEBF64 MEBF41 NA MEBF42
10-18-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89
82.7
35.3 J 544
75200 128000
4.9 J
17100
411 JB 34900
98.5
3360 J 31600
28500 74800
-- R
7.9 J 7.3 J
60.1 599
470
12 J
480
11 JB
2300 J
2900 J
NA
NA
NA 146
NA 575
NA
NA 147000
NA
NA
NA
NA 11700
NA
NA 27900
NA 341
NA
NA 29000
NA
NA
NA 52700
NA
NA
NA 39.7 B
370 D 190
3 J
120
330 D
51 DJB 2 JB
1700 D 2 JB
2000 D
GH-GUGH27A-03
EEY09
MEBF09
10-18-89
19.4 JB
24 J
111000
13.9
3.3 J
1320
24300
805
288
3720 J
42100
4.9 JB
13 JB
9
4 J
7 J
8 J
6
3 J
4 BJ
1 BJ
2 J
GH-GUGH28A-03 GH-GUGH28B-03 GH-FRGUGH28B-03
EEY10 EEY11 EEY71
HEBF10 MEBF11 MEBF71
10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89
10.2 JB
3.6 JB
28.8 J 113 J
74300 73000
2.5 J
348 142 B
17900 18500
162 71.7
89.7
13000 1720 JB
65100 22200
2.5 JB 3.7 JB
32.6 B 12.9 JB
9
5 J
3 J
8 J
8 J
2 J
1 J
3 JB 3 JB
2 J
98.6 JB
2.9 JB
114 J
68500
222 B
-- R
18000
68.1
1140 J
23000
7.8 JB
2 JB
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 6 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 , 2 - d i ch I orobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1, A -dich I orobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy I naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo( b) f I uorant hene
Benzo(ghi )perylene
Benzo( k ) f I uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
I ndeno( 1 , 2 , 3 - cd ) py rene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4.4'-DDD
GH-GUGH228-03 GH-GWGH24A-03 GH-GUGH24A-03 RE GH-GUGH26A-03 GH-GUGH27A-03 GH-GUGH28A-03 GH-GUGH28B-03 GH-FRGUGH28B-03
EEY64 EEY41
MEBF64 MEBF41
10-18-89 10-19-89
3 J
15
8 J
5 J
65
34
110 J
4 JB
3 J
8 J
69
5 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
EEY41RE EEY42 EEY09 EEY10 EEY11 EEY71
NA MEBF42 HEBF09 HEBF10 MEBF11 MEBF71
10-19-89 10-19-89 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 11 J
NA 2 JB
NA
NA 2 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 5 J
NA
NA
usable
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mac-90
TABLE 19
Page 7 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/t)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans- 1, 3-D ichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH29A-03
EEY12
MEBF12
10-16-89
9.2 JB
16.7
229
121000
2450
26000
659
9020
85200
4.6 JB
9.4 JB
GH-FRGUCH29A-03
EEY69
MEBF69
10-16-89
66.8 JB
15
219
112000
2450
2.7 JB
24400
609
8050
79900
18.5 JB
GH-GWGH29B-03 GH-GUGH29C-03
EEY13 EEY14
MEBF13 MEBF14
10-16-89 10-16-89
12.2 JB 163 JB
4 JB 31
86.8 J 16.8 JB
68700 7600
531 67.4 JB
20400 3770 J
221 2.2 JB
2790 J 3270 J
24100 57600
4.1 JB 15.5 JB
6.3 JB
8
1 JB
GH-GUGH30A-03
EEY15
HEBF15
10-17-89
78.4
1240
143000
2 J
9170
67300
137
17.3 J
49700
117000
4.9 JB
13.2 JB
7
3 J
GH-GUGH30B-03
EEY16
MEBF16
10-17-89
9.2 JB
46.4
1410
138000
1.7 J
8560
68900
66.9
42900
119000
6.1 JB
5.5 JB
19
GH-GWGH31A-03
EEY17
MEBF17
10-17-89
14.3 JB
51.5
568
126000
6.1 J
19000
97600
136
27.9 J
37600
127000
4 JB
7.4 JB
5
1 J
GH-GUGH31B-03
EEY18
MEBF18
10-17-89
15.3 JB
55.8
1360
145000
1.8 J
13100
91400
96
66300
2.1 J
159000
5.4 JB
6 JB
18
3 J
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 19 Page 8 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH29A-03 GH-FRGUCH29A-03 GH-GWGH29B-03 GH-GWGH29C-03 GH-GUGH30A-03 GH-GUGH30B-03 GH-GUGH31A-03 GH-GUGH31B-03
OTR NUMBER: EEY12 EEY69 EEY13 EEY14 EEY15 EEY16 EEY17 EEY1B
ITR NUMBER: MEBF12 MEBF69 MEBF13 MEBF14 MEBF15 MEBF16 MEBF17 MEBF18
DATE SAMPLED: 10-16-89 10-16-89 10-16-89 10-16-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89
___
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1, A-d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy{naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(Z-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-ni trosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol 2 J 5 J
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 9 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/t)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
A-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichl oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH31C-03 GH-GUGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 RE
EEY19 EEY28 EEY47 EEY47RE
MEBF19 MEBF28 MEBF47 NA
10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89
124 JB 156 JB 141 JB
10.1 46.6 53.7
16.8 JB 425 418
4840 J 91400 91700
3.5 J
1.1 JB
60 JB 11200 10700
-- R -- R
764 JB 43800 44100
1.7 JB 192 188
11800 45500 45500
70400 107000 106000
3.3 JB 2.6 J 3.2 J
7.2 JB 28.2 JB 22.6 JB
12 12
3 JB
1 JB 1 JB 20 B
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUGH33A-03 GH-GUGH33A-03 RE
EEY20 EEY20RE
MEBF20 NA
10-19-89 10-19-89
47.1 J
427
99800
10.6 J
12200 J
45600
65.8
32.4 JB
49200
95800
-- R
30.6 B
23
4 J
7
480 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-- R
19 D
6 DJ
380 D
GH-GUGH33B-03
EEY29
MEBF29
10-17-89
166 JB
285
928
111000
3.2 JB
11300
2.3 JB
57300
36.9
16.1 J
30900
105000
3.7 J
11.1 JB
16
4 J
8 J
33
GH-GWGH34A-03
EEY21
MEBF21
10-17-89
12.4 JB
27.5
179 J
91100
2.1 J
2800
33200
572
16.6 J
33600
57000
4.2 JB
8.9 JB
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 19 Page 10 of 22
' G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - d i ch I orobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroani line
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo( b) f I uoranthene
Benzo(ghi )perylene
Benzo( k ) f I uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthatate
Di-n-butyt phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylaroine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD
GH-GUGH31C-03 GH-GWGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 RE GH-GWGH33A-03 GH-GUGH33A-03 RE GH-GWGH33B-03
EEY19 EEY28 EEY47 EEY47RE EEY20 EEY20RE EEY29
MEBF19 MEBF28 MEBF47 NA MEBF20 NA MEBF29
10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-17-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-- R -- R NA
-- R -- R NA
-- R •- R NA
-- R -- R NA
NA
NA
3 JB NA 5 JB
-- R -- R NA
NA
NA 1 J
-- R -- R NA
-- R -- R NA
NA
NA
NA
2 J NA
NA
NA
GH-GUGH34A-03
EEY21
MEBF21
10-17-89
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 11 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
GH-GUGH34B-03
EEY22
MEBF22
10-17-89
19.3 JB
12
139 J
76800
2.3 J
1080
21400
79.5
816 JB
5530
6.9 JB
GH-GUGH35A-03
EEY30
MEBF30
10-17-89
141 JB
61.8
929
109000
3.1 J
3.1 JB
13800
-- R
33800
107
38200
84700
4.1 J
11.4 JB
2 J
GH-GUGH35B-03
EEY31
MEBF31
10-17-89
74.8 JB
1.6 JB
102 J
111000
6020
-- R
37300
42.3
2700 J
57000
2.8 J
23.4 JB
GH-GUGH36A-03
EEY23
MEBF23
10-18-89
180 JB
5.4 JB
177 J
128000
11.7
7.1 J
1890
-- R
25700
640
17.6 J
8210
405000
3.5 J
101 J
GH-GUGH36B-03
EEY24
MEBF24
10-18-89
134 JB
6.8 JB
322
159000
1.1 JB
1900
-- R
42200
101
1860 J
228000
3.9 J
14.8 JB
GH-GUGH37A-03
EEY25
MEBF25
10-17-89
151 JB
25.9
891
116000
3290
-- R
29700
335
13700
91600
31.8 JB
GH-GUGH39A-03
EEY33
MEBF33
10-18-89
56.5 J
335
76500
5400 J
28600
386
27.2 JB
23700
53800
-- R
51
GH-GUGH40A-03
EEY73
MEBF73
10-18-89
35.2 J
349
84600
3330 J
56100
47.1
44200
91100
-- R
22 B
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
DibromochIoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans-1,3-D i chIoropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
27
25
3 JB
2 J
2 JB
3 JB
1 JB
19
2 JB
6 B
18
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 19 Page 12 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH34B-03 GH-GWGH35A-03 GH-GWGH35B-03 GH-GWGH36A-03 GH-GWGH36B-03 GH-GUGH37A-03 GH-GUGH39A-03 GH-GUGH40A-03
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
EEY22
MEBF22
10-17-89
EEY30
MEBF30
10-17-89
EEY31
MEBF31
10-17-89
EEY23
MEBF23
10-18-89
EEY24
MEBF24
10-18-89
EEY25
MEBF25
10-17-89
EEY33
MEBF33
10-18-89
EEY73
MEBF73
10-18-89
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-d i chIorobenzene
1,3-dich I orobenzene
1,4 -d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 11
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 13 B
D i benzo(a,h)anth racene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol 2 J
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-ODD
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 13 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH40B-03 GH-FRGWGH40B-03 GH-GUGH41B-03 GH-GUGH42B-03 GH-GUGH43A-03 GH-GWGH43A-03 DL
OTR NUMBER: EEY51 EET27 EEY34 EEY35 EEY52 EEY52DL
ITR NUMBER: MEBF51 MEBF27 MEBF34 ME8F35 MEBF52 NA
DATE SAMPLED: 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-19-89 10-17-89 10-17-89
(ug/t)
Aluminum 301 B 173 JB
Antimony
Arsenic 29.2 J 30.5 J 92.5 J 27.2 J 2.7 JB
Barium 1530 1540 680 302 89.4 J
Cadmium
Calcium 87000 86300 104000 77400 59000
Chromium
Cobalt 1.6 JB
Copper 19.6 JB 4 JB
Iron 3200 J 3220 J 10100 J 1830 J 42.3 JB
Lead -• R
Magnesium 60600 60600 47100 24300 23400
Manganese 14.2 J 11.6 J 31.1 40.4 383
Nickel 37.8 JB 43 B 44 B 33 J
Potassium 53300 53000 19600 1460 J 22500
Selenium
Si Iver
Sodium 86200 87900 75800 22900 102000
Thallium -- R -- R -- R 4 JB
Vanadium
Zinc 43.3 B 50.5 22 B 28.8 B 38.4 JB
1,2,2-Tetrachtoroethane
1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-Trichloroethane
1-Dichloroethane
2-Dichloroethane
2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone -- R
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene 60
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane 2 J
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride 3 JB
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 -D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GWGH43B-03
EEY53
MEBF53
10-17-89
156 JB
15
378
121000
2890
-- R
36500
63.1
1580 J
115000
2.9 J
47.5 JB
3 J
3 JB
2 JB
33
GH-GUGH44A-03
EEY54
MEBF54
10-18-89
48.9 J
350
4.7 J
85400
12.3 JB
8380 J
38900
79.5
40500
89900
-- R
33 B
30
3 JB
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 14 of 22
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH40B-03 GH-FRGUGH40B-03
OTR NUMBER: EEYS1 EEY27
ITR NUMBER: MEBF51 MEBF27
DATE SAMPLED: 10-18-89 10-18-89
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS v
MONITORING WELLS
GH-GWGH41B-03 GH-GWGH42B-03 GH-GWGH43A-03 GH-GWGH43A-03 DL GH-GWGH43B-03 GH-GUGH44A-03
EEY34 EEY35 EEY52 EEY52DL EEY53 EEY54
MEBF34 MEBF3S MEBF52 NA MEBF53 MEBF54
10-18-89 10-19-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-18-89
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichtorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenot
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chtoroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indenod ,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-ODD
5 J
6 J
3 J
330 JB
250 DB
12 B
10
2 J
3 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 15 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1.1. 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 - D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH45A-03
EEY55
MEBFS5
10-16-89
142 JB
8.7 J
162 J
85100
3600
-- R
43500
411
31600
74200
3 J
22.1 JB
25 B
2 J
3 JB
GH-GUI03-03
EEY65
MEBF65
10-17-89
206 B
9.3 J
54.9 J
23600
47.9 JB
8.7 JB
23600
7.3 J
30700
102000
142 J
10
10
3 JB
GH-GUI05-03
EEY43
MEBF43
10-18-89
86.1 J
788
132000
5.1 J
7.1 J
20000 J
79700
139
42.6 B
109000
185000
-- R
8.8 J
145
26
27
11
GH-GURD08XX-03
EEY66
MEBF66
10-19-89
83.9
510
90500
5120
40000
42.2
11300
1.9 J
56900
436
-- R
2 J
3 JB
GH-GURD18-03
EEY44
MEBF44
10-19-89
160
54.5 J
91200
6820
33600
41.8
4490 J
3.5 J
73300
65.3
1 J
5 JB
GH-GURD24-03
EEY56
HEBF56
10-19-89
15.9 J
173 J
60300
11.7 JB
794
19200
28
1560 J
2.7 J
25600
3.7 JB
8
3 J
GH-GURL04-03
EEY45
HEBF45
10-19-89
1440
211000
9.8 JB
7.7 J
42200
45900
607
47900
60700
13.9 J
95.1 J
180
2 JB
12
GH-FRGURL04-03
EEY48
MEBF48
10-19-89
61 JB
1460
212000
8.9 JB
7.7 J
42800
46600
612
48500
61300
13.5 J
66 J
160
8 B
12
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 19 Page 16 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH45A-03 GH-GUI03-03 GH-GUI05-03 GH-GURD08XX-03 GH-GURD18-03 GH-GURD24-03 GH-GURL04-03 GH-FRGURL04-03
OTR NUMBER: EEY55 EEY65 EEY43 EEY66 EEY44 EEYS6 EEY45 EEY48
ITR NUMBER: MEBF55 MEBF6S MEBF43 MEBF66 MEBF44 MEBF56 MEBF4S MEBF48
DATE SAMPLED: 10-16-89 10-17-89 10-18-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89
_____
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-d i chIorobenzene
1,4-d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy(naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nttroanaline 2 J
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
BenzoCghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid 9 J 10 J
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 150 B 4 JB 3 JB
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene 13 10 10 J
Phenanthrene 2 J 3 J
Phenol 11 2 J 2 J 3 J 9 J
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD .1 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 17 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
S i I ver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulf ide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D ibromochloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Hethylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 - D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GWRL06-03 GH-GWRL06-03 RE
EEY46 EEY46RE
MEBF46 NA
10-19-89 10-19-89
65 JB
28.1
2470
152000
5 JB
25.4 J
53600
117000
480
46
51500
91900
15.6 J
147
3 J
90
19 B
1200 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-- R
77 0
14 DJB
940 D
GH-GURL29-03 GH-FRGURL29-03
EEY57 EEY76
MEBF57 MEBF76
10-19-89 10-19-89
197 JB
28.8 J
774
154000
15.1 J
47500
74600
94.5 J
90.4
44700
2.1 J
166000
13.2 J
162
15 J
13 J
28 J
100 B
520 J
93 J
184 JB
17.5 J
711
149000
16.2 J
54600
4.4 JB
72300
108 J
96.8
45700 ,
163000
15.4 J
160
4 J
5 J
2 J
38 J
15 B
10 J
21 J
56 B
2 J
180 J
1 J
68 J
GH-GURU10-03
EEY58
MEBF58
10-19-89
92.9 JB
2070
239000
13.2 B
10.9 J
56800
26700
1110
42.2
48100
79300
18 J
118
16 J
170
14 J
88
250
9 JB
520
630
GH-GURU14-03
EEY67
MEBF67
10-19-89
80.1
263
159000
4.9 JB
16.8 JB
26200
45100
111
39600
102000
9.4 J
336
-- R
1300
1600
.
6400
GH-GURU21-03 GH-GURU22-03
EEY36 EEY37
MEBF36 MEBF37
10-19-89 10-19-89
35.5 J 111
89.8 J 455
87700 123000
7440 J 16500
27700 35400
114 149
21000 30000
74800 68700
-- R
6.8 J
49.5 41 B
97
7 J
15 10 J
67
5 B 250
350
-------
07-Har-90
TABLE 19
Page 18 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1 , 3 - d i ch I orobenzene
1 , A - d i ch I orobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy (naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenot
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)f luoranthene
BenzoCghi )perylene
BenzoC k ) f I uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyt) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a>h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4, 4' -ODD
GH-GURL06-03 GH-GWRL06-03 RE GH-GURL29-03 GH-FRGURL29-03
EEY46 EEY46RE EEYS7 EEY76
HEBF46 NA MEBFS7 MEBF76
10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
41 NA 2 J 2 J
NA
2 J NA 5 J 3 J
NA
NA
2 J NA 32 27
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 17 J 110 J
NA
5 JB NA
NA
NA 3 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
33 NA 2 J 4 J
NA
4 J NA 2 J 3 J
NA
NA
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
GH-GURU10-03
EEY58
MEBF58
10-19-89
9 J
2 J
9 J
14
9 J
10
89
310 J
14 B
3 J
27
13
4.4
GH-GURU14-03
EEY67
MEBF67
10-19-89
7 J
120
12 J
330
13 JB
7 J
4 J
6 J
120
20
GH-GURU21-03 GH-GWRU22-03
EEY36 EEY37
MEBF36 MEBF37
10-19-89 10-19-89
6 J
8 J
2 J
3 JB 5 JB
14
3 J
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 19 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE II! ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichtoroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-CURW23-03 GH-GURW24-03 GH-GURU30-03 GH-GUTB01-03
EEY38 EEY59 EEY60 EFQ76
MEBF38 MEBF59 MEBF60 NA
10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-17-89
29.9 14.6
86 J 2220 30.8 J
113000 172000 97600
12.7 B
10.2 JB
9740 41100 30.3 JB
29800 54800 23500
336 297 24.4
36.1 J
5240 50700 1630 J
2 J
56600 82500 100000
11.8 J
40.8 B 31 B 60.5
-- R
1 J 190
2 J
760
6 B
2 JB
2 J
3200
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5 J
4 J
GH-GUTB02-03
EF077
NA
10-17-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5 J
6
GH-GUTB03-03
EFQ78
NA
10-18-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
77
7
GH-GUTB04-03
EFQ79
10-18-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 J
GH-GUTB06-03
EEY99
NA
10-19-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 J
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 20 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 , 2 - d i ch I orobenzene
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy (naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzol b)f I uoranthene
BenzoCghi )perylene
Benzo( k ) f luoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Oiethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N - n i t rosod i pheny I ami ne
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4, 4' -ODD
GH-GURU23-03 GH-GURU24-03
EEY38 EEY59
MEBF38 MEBF59
10-19-89 10-19-89
41
21 B
2 J
3 J
270
5 J
2.1
GH-GURU30-03 GH-GUTB01-03
EEY60 EFQ76
HEBF60 NA
10-19-89 10-17-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUTB02-03
EF077
NA
10-17-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GWTB03-03
EFQ78
NA
10-18-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUTB04-03
EFQ79
10-18-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUTB06-03
EEY99
NA
10-19-89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
Page 21 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 orornet hane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUFB01-03 GH-GUFB02-03 GH-GUFB03-03 GH-GWFB04-03
EEY49 EEY50 EEY68 EEY70
MEBF49 MEBF50 MEBF68 MEBF70
10-18-89 10-19-89 10-16-89 10-17-89
95.6 JB 77.7 JB
1.2 JB 1.1 JB
2 J 3.5 J
315 J 67.2 JB 661 J 733 J
13.7 JB
25.3 JB 55.2 JB 44.9 JB 17.6 JB
-- R -- R
164 J 268 J
1.1 J
146 J 1230 JB 1030 JB
-- R
9.3 JB 7.4 J
1 J
26 B
2 J
5 J 5
GH-GUFB05-03 GH-GUFB06-03
EEY72 EEY75
MEBF72 MEBF75
10-18-89 10-19-89
93.6 JB
1.2 JB
1.6 J
811 J 431 JB
4.7 JB
164 J 130 J
1080 JB 639 J
9.8 J
2 J
72 1 J
6
-------
07-Mar-90 TABLE 19 Page 22 of 22
G&H LANDFILL
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUFB01-03
EEY49
MEBF49
10-18-89
GH-GUFB02-03
EEY50
MEBF50
10-19-89
GH-GUFB03-03
EEY68
MEBF68
10-16-89
GH-GUFB04-03
EEY70
MEBF70
10-17-89
GH-GUFB05-03
EEY72
MEBF72
10-18-89
GH-GUFB06-03
EEY75
MEBF75
10-19-89
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-d i chIorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy[naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 90
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-ODD
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
TB = Trip blank
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 20
Page 1 of 3
MONITORING WELLS -
Rl PHASE III
G&H LANDFILL
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH02A-03
SAS NUMBER: E36
DATE SAMPLED: 10-18-89
TDS
Alkalinity
BOO
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
Chloride
Sulfate
Oi I and Grease
678
A87
it B
56
22
0.08
20
113
GH-GUGH12A-03
E41
10-18-89
696
481
3 B
40
11
0.17
7.5
94
50
GH-GUGH24A-03
E45
10-19-89
773
595
19
146
45
0.34
25
98
4
GH-GUGH26A-03
E43
10-19-89
705
542
4 B
54
20
0.19
20
74
14
GH-GUGH32A-03
E03
10-17-89
800
640
NA
35
11
0.13
45
140
24
GH-FRGUGH32A-03
E04
10-17-89
788
638
NA
36
11
0.12
48
135
25
GH-GUGH33B-03
EOS
10-17-89
888
668
NA
56
15
0.16
19
132
3
GH-GUGH35A-03
E02
10-17-89
748
592
NA
80
21
0.34
31
114
3
NOTES: B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
NA = Not Analyzed
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 20
Page 2 of 3
G&H LANDFILL
MONITORING UELLS - CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH35B-03
SAS NUMBER: £01
DATE SAMPLED: 10-17-89
TDS
Alkalinity
BOD
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
Chloride
Sulfate
Oil and Grease
616
439
NA
40
10
0.12
1.3
76
32
GH-GUGH39A-03 GH-GUGH40A-03
E39 E40
10-18-89 10-18-89
542
359
5 B
45
13
0.07
4
92
836
750
3 B
52
13
0.1
21
131
70
GH-GUGH41B-03
E42
10-18-89
734
554
7 B
111
23
0.35
15
110
2
GH-GUGH42B-03
£44
10-19-89
436
293
4 B
28
0.11
0.45
44
25
GH-GUI05-03
E38
10-18-89
1378
1198
3 B
103
29
0.11
85
245
GH-GURD18-03
E48
10-19-89
640
293
2 B
23
5
0.07
1.7
135
62
GH-GURL04-03 GH-FRGURL04-03
£49 £53
10-19-89 10-19-89
1127
1014
18 J
204 J
43 J
0.5
40
67
17 J
a
1113
1032
7 BJ
246 J
33 J
0.45
39
64
23 J
8
NOTES: B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
NA = Not Analyzed
-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 20
Page 3 of 3
G&H LANDFILL
MONITORING WELLS - CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-GURL06-03
SAS NUMBER: E46
DATE SAMPLED: 10-19-89
TDS
Alkalinity
BOD
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
Chloride
Sulfate
Oil and Grease
1283
1184
20
211
63
0.63
31
79
6
GH-GURU21-03
E50
10-19-89
625
471
5 B
123
21
0.68
15
99
22
GH-GURU22-03
E51
10-19-89
768
594
10
100
32
0.35
27
97
9
GH-GWRU23-03 GH-GUFB01-03 GH-GUFB02-03
E52 E37 E47
10-19-89 10-18-89 10-19-89
606
383
3 B 2
35
8
0.15
2.5
82
53
NOTES: B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
NA = Not Analyzed
-------
Agency Review Draft
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
Volume 2 of 2
G&H LANDFILL SITE
Shelby Township, Michigan
WA 12-5170.0/Contract No. 68-W8-0040
March 16, 1990
This document has been prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
under Contract No. 68-W8-0040. The material contained herein is considered
confidential and is not to be disclosed to, discussed with, or made available to
any person or persons for any reason without the prior express approval of a
responsible official of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
GLT959/019.50-2
-------
CA-2-79
chen and associates, inc.
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVE ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24
45
70
in
c/l
tt. VI
PERCENT
bo (3 3 86
HR 7
MIN 15
J1 01
HR
MIN 60 H
02 01
IN 19
35 0<
MIN 4 M
» J
N 1 V
9
UN '2
17 0
DO -10
74 X
0 -5
19 2
0 -40-3
97 1 i
42
B 'I
90 1
s
19
0
'
6
! 'A
38 «
^zi
76 9.
52 l<
) 1 38
.-
1 . 7
5" (
52 12
7
1!
r
X
a
S fi 8 a o °~
RETAINED
Z
UJ
70
ao
30
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT
SANO
PINE
MEDIUM
[COARSE
GRAVEL
PINE
COARSE
4COBBLES
GRAVEL 8
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
Natural Moisture
SANO H? H SILT AND CLAY *»5 %
% PLASTICITY INDEX *
FROM Sample No. GH-SS02A308 E-01
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVE ANALYSIS
24
45
100
90
ao
70
U3
£»
UJ
£40
£
X
20
10
0
.0
r
MR 7 t
MIN 151
M^M^W
^•^•^M
•^K^H^
Tl
•IB
JIN 60»i
^=i
01 002 (X
ME RE
•IN 19
15 (X
kOlNGS
MIN 4 MIN i t
r=
^
•IN '2
» 319 037 0
» '1C
us.
» -5
n 149 2>
STAND/
0 '40 '3
=i=
-rf-
-7
zb
97
ba
5
kROSEP
0 -1
» i
IES 1 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
•10 1
8 1
•=-+
<»
f-
19 *2.
38 4
re 9
— h
=d
h
>2 19.1 38.1 76.2 127
r
2C
10
o
intu
<
^
Ui
SOU
Z
UI
«g
UJ
&
70
»
90
too
0
<2 20
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT
SAND
-IN6 I MEDIUM [COARSEl -INE 1 COARSE
GRAVEL
•(COBBLES
GRAVEL 26
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
SAND 6 1 % SILT AND CLAY 1 3 %
% PLASTICITY INDEX *
FROM Sample No. GH-SS07M308 E-02
89
'•l3tura] Moisture = 8.8/
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
Fig..
-------
CA-2-79
chen and associates, inc.
24
44
100
90
80
70
§60
crt
?,„
PERCENT
Oo o 8 8 4 •
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
MR 7
MIN IS
01 O
Tl
-IR
MIN MM
32 .31
MERE/
UN 19
35 OC
kOINGS
MIN 4M
» 0
N 1 Ik
9 u.
UN "i
17 0
SIEVE ANALYSIS
» -10
74 ^
US
0 '3
— »
19 2
STAND
5 -40'3
="
)7 5
42
»RO SEr
9
=|
90 1
2 ic
1"
.1 76.2 127
1
GRAVEL
FINE
COARSE
X
(2
30
O
4i°r
VK
SOE
U*
600
70
80
90
100
10
COBBLES
89
GRAVEL 1 2 %
LIQUID LIMIT *
SAMPLE OF
Natural Moisture = 11.2x
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
SAND 69 % SILT AND CLAY 19 %
* PLASTICITY INDEX %
FROM Sample No. GH-SS12A308 E-0<+
Fig L
-------
CA-2-79
chen and associates, inc.
24
45
100
90
ao
70
PERCENT PASStf
3 8 8 ft 8 i
0
a
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS
MR 7
MIN IS
I^^MBB
••^•^MB
?=
91 U
Til
HR
MIN 80 V
^•••HWMH
1
1 1**
02 01
«E RE/
IN 19
==
DS 01
DINGS
MIN 4M
N ' fc
—
••^-
>9 J19 j.
1
UN '?
17 C
M ^0
4 1
MIN IS I
01 OC
Tl
4R.
JIN SOlr
12 OC
ME R&
UN 19
» (X
40INGS
MIN 4 M
)9 01
CLAY TO SILT
IN 1 tl
9 a
IN '2
1
17 0
OIA
0 '1C
U 14
METER
US STAND)
10 -SO -40*3
1 i — *—
9 297 ' 5
42
OF PARTICL
IRO SEP
0 -i
90 1
: IN Ml
IES
•10
• r
=±
19 12
2.0
LLIMET
9
38 4
ERS
SANO
;INE | MEDIUM ICOARSE
>.
—
CTTTT
'6 9
CLEARS
i- *
2 19
QUARE
•" 1
.1 3<
OPENIh
>- 3
i 76
GRAVEL
CINE | COARSE
IGS
r •
2 12
"
:
7'
1!
r
2
-------
CA-2-79
chen and associates, inc.
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
24'HP. 7 HP.
4S MIN IS MIN. 60 MIN 19 MIN « MIN
SIEVE ANALYSIS
U S STANDARD SERIES
1 MIN '200 '100 '50 '40 '30 "6 f-a
CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
vj- r 5-8 8-
1
1 40
10
°a
91 01
02 01
tt Of
19 0
19 o.
7 0
OIA
CLAV TO SILT
74 1
METER
19 2
OF PA
97 S
42
RTICL
kMMM—
p=9
90 t
EIN Ml
K^
19
LLIM
c!
e
R
0
El
=Z=
38 4
•ERS
SANO
FINE | MEDIUM
[COARSE
^
76 $.
m
52 i(
^
» 1 3J
.i . r
GRAVEL
-INE | COARSE
m
—
J2 12
__
:
1
iHB
^•1
•••
V.
a
8 & 8 a o °
RETAINED
!N33H3d _
8 S i R 5B
ES
GRAVEL 6
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
SANO 36 S SILT AND CLAY 58 v,
4k ^fc
2 A PLASTICITY INDEX 10
FROM Sample No. GH-SS15A308 E-07
Natural Moisture = 12.83;
24
45
100
90
O
*n,
PERCENT
_o S 3 8 S
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
MR 7 »
MIN IS 1
at oc
Tl
•4A
JIN SO Hi
! i 1 1
12 OC
ME RE
UN 19
tt 01
tOlNGS
MIN 4 M
1'
» 0
IN 1 fc
1
9 0
UN -2
37 0
OIA
CLAY TO SILT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
» '10
r* 14
METER
US
0 -5
• :
OF PA
STA
o -4
97
RTI
NO/
0'3
m
=
s
42
CLE
kRO SEP
0 M
==
JO 1
: IN Ml
IES
•10
> r
=J
19
2
LLIMI
t
0
rr
s
^
38 4
ERS
SAND
FINE
MEDIUM (COARSE
V
=
76 9
;LEA«S
,- >.
—
>2 IS
OUAPE
1 1 3C
OPEN^
,- 3
1 76
GRAVEL
--INE I COARSE
GS
r • 5"
1
=-=£
.2 127
1
r
=
hi
52
COBBLES
86835°
RETAINED
60S
cc
UJ
a.
70
90
90
100
10
i An 89
GRAVEL 6 % SAND
LIQUID LIMIT 22 *
SAMPLE OF
Natural Moisturp = 21.3
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
% SILT AND CLAY 50 %
PLASTICITY INDEX 8 %
FROM Samole No. GH-SS16/A308 E-08
Fig..
-------
CA-2-79
chen and associates, inc.
24
45
90
80
70
i ao
V)
PERCENT PA
S 8 8 £ 8
01
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
MR. 7 I
MIN 15 »
TIH
*R
•UN. 60 M
K. RE/
IN 19
"^y^
DINGS
MIN 4M
N 1 Ik
UN '2
SIEVE ANALYSIS
1
M '10
U.S.
0 -5
STA
o •«
MO
J-»
:z2
"—
«RO SEF
) -i
IIES
5 M,
—
»•«
i
~m
'-
t=~~
CLEAR i
r '
•5=
iOUARE
." V
OPEN^
-." 3
2 1S
lOUARE
I- 1
.1 36
OPENIh
*- :
.1 76
as
r • 5-
2 127
1!
r
X
a
88388
PERCENT RETA
100
10
CLAY TO SILT
SANO
PINE
1 MEDIUM
ICOARSE
GRAVEL
CINE
| COARSE
COBBLES
GRAVEL 17
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLEOF
Natura
SAND 6^*
*
89
* SILT AND CLAY 19 %
PLASTICITY INDEX NP H
FROM Sample No. GH-SS23A308 E-10
Moisture = 12. 9V
GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig __
5
-------
CA-2-T9
chen and associates, inc.
24
45
100
90
80
70
i 80
*/>
PERCENT PA
o X ^ 6 8
0
.01
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
HR 7
MIN IS
P^HBMI^B
JP*-S
Tl
HH
MIN 60 M
aii-1
UIEREX
UN 19
E— •
iDINGS
MIN 4 M
53
N i ^
F=^
•IN . '2
B— "
SIEVE ANALYSIS
M ''0
-r*
US.
o •&
STAND
0 '40 '3
=4=
»RO SEf
0 -1
llES
5 'T-'
It 002 005 009 019 -37 074 149 297 1 590 1 19 2
42 20
i
:
38 476 9
SQUARE
." V
OPENI*
IGS
!
52 19.1 38 1 . 76.2 127
S'
2C
>z
r
10
20
0
UJ
40Z
88388
PERCENT RE
io'
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT
SANO
PINE
| MEDIUM
ICOARSE
GRAVEL
FINE
| COARSE
COBBLES
GRAVEL 21 %
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
Natural Moisture
SANO 62 % SILT AND CLAY 17
PLASTICITY INOOC NP %
FROM Sample No. GH-SS2V*4308 E-11
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVE ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
U S. STANDARD SERIES
CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24
46
J
K
30
10
0
0
MR 7 f
MIN IS 1
01 OC
•5 01
MIN 4 M
39 0
IN 1 *
9 a
UN •?
37 0
DIA
CLAY TO SILT
» "1C
U 14
METER
10 -S
9 2
OF PA
0 '4
0'3
=3
—
=4=
J7 1 S
42
RTICLI
O -1
30 1
• IN Ml
•10
» |-
=rj-
19 12.
20
LLIMET
I ••
38 4
ERS
SAND
PINE
MEDIUM (COARSE
*
76 9.
>• "
12 i;
.- i
n M
»- 3
1 rs
GRAVEL
CINE
COARSE
- • r
1 - -1-
2 127
1
r
21!
52
COBBLES
! fc 8 8 5 °
ETAINEO
Z
UJ
600
UJ
a.
70
n
90
100
10
GRAVEL %
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
SAND % SILT AND CLAY
* PLASTICITY INDEX
FROM
l M3 89
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
Fig..
-------
HYDROMETER
GRADATION
L WORKSHEET
H
ATERIALJJ*
• •>••<.*.
JOB NO.
PART NO.
JOB NAME
PREP. BY_LAfa£-DATB
CALC.
DEPTH
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
SAMPLE
.-^ Vf
"arP^t— i^U
BUN BY
SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVING TIME
-> -^
2.1 -C5
71 ^
Iv.o
2i.c?
£J£*C^GRA1
-L--»vO.«^7
MTY
i. AMOUNT /_
DISPERSIN
•2*'
HYC.
READ
•**-
zq.o
•?<= ^
,- •>
r\ .^
^3.0
10. o
HYD.*
CORR
-^
4.-:
•- .7.
4 -fi
8i2B
FACTOR X CORRECTED READING =
X OF TOTAL PASSINQ
% OF TOTAL
PASSBVG
y
^
«
.^
^
- ^
c -|
2Z7
(o
/
O *
GRAVEL ? ' * 5AMn 47 * ^L'v.c, rr 4S~ *
G AGENT" 6*/0fVfi ^*O 5
ll DATE
PARTICLE
DIAMETER
0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
r ALIR
•_-
^TfiBArjp | nrrAjlON mmimmi _____
* coMccnoN mouDCS TEMP, •CHOCUS. AMD OCFIOCULENT
~ :DATE IN: SUPERVISOR:
L-- cs-esj "" LOCATION:___
-------
..., HYDROMETER GRADA™N ANALYS.P^T.u^ ™Ku^l
r' ••_ WORKSHEET »VIM! LAB MO - -**•***
-CAUTION: HAZARDOL
^n
JOB NO. I-*!**
JOB NAME -P-SA -
PART
IT
PREP. BY.
CALC.
DATB
CKEO. BY
HOLE
NO._Q2*.
VISUAL
RUM BY
SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
OP PAN AfO SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED —
IIILI .mi I'M i inn ^
% OF TOTAL PASSING
?
— *>
3"
1 1/2"
3/4"
(00
3/8"
uz.?
^
NO.4
7P.2.
74;
WXs
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
WET DRY /
' • /
SAMPLE X^«^. "
RETAINED —>« 7
ON NO. 4_L__ ^O^Z.
PASSING • A>, ''fls
NO. A . ,_,„ \2/0& *L
RUN BY
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVING TIME
SIEVE
NO.
8 (103
16
30 (40]
50
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
l-.V\
\1.^>\
•20.<^l
arAfe
4O-\2,
4 \.-ll.
.A^ m "~
WEIGHT
PASSING
X OF
TOTAL
PASSING
6^ ^
5G '
4^ /
Z^ 7
1C"'
' ^ y
i -z /
/ _'
FACTOR r JK£ =
W
tMIS^ •
. - MOISTURE DETERMINATION
•
DISH NO.
WT.WETSOLANDDBH
WT. DRY SOIL AND DBH
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
•4
MATERIAL
-4
MATERIAL
C.-!1^-
341 .S
&?{*(,
^J ^*^( i C*P
«rs7..-2.'
: W
?.?S"
MYGRO.
'MOISTURS
^i.Tf
4^3,0?
— ^»
O.V2-*
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
£•*. ^-
50,3 I '
RUN BY n T unwivic i cn MI^MUTOIO
CYLINDgP NO. // CBC/-IC
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
^.2.1
I.ZZ-
_•— ^—
^A^J"
/O ^ £*
^7 ft «>* *^
9. W2^
^.5?
1\.Q%
r» C,rQi^<»- PATP /2
1C GRAV
-27- *
MTY
'9 ' <
J5 AMOUNT t_!
D1SPERSIN
2sr
TEST TIME
START MIX
STOP MIX
— -0.5 min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMr.
2.0 . O
•zc.c
2.0,0
J-0- £
•LI. d
2.7. n
HYD.
READ
w.o
1*1.0
10. S"
10.^
9s .O
1-0
CORR*
5o
4.'
••
CCRR
READ
DNISSVd 1
r ONIOV3U 0310
Si <
s *-
e o
0 °
0 u.
x O
§ ^
N"
O
<
u.
X Or TOTAL
PASSNG
)3 '
10 ^
-7 ' f
-7 J
5" y
3 '
GRAVEL .Z-Co * CAMn 'o / * H^-SLT 'S *
G AGE
ll DA
PARTIC
DIAMET
MT • y*S* AfAP0**
TE
=|
0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.0 19 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
CALIH
«.
••-
STORAGE 1 OCATION _., ' "
COMtCCTION IMCUBCS TtM^ MCHSOJS. AMD OCTLOCULCMT
DATE IN: _ SUPERVISOR:
.T-
—:*" L-4 (5-653
LOCATION:.
-------
HYDROMETER
CAUTION: HA/AKUL
GRAOAI].°" A"ALYSIS MATERIAL IN USE
WORKSHEET
JOB NAME
LAB NO
PREP. BY I^WA HATS IT-/a -Eft
CALC. BY ^^ CKED. BV QP
DEPTH
SAMPLE NO
VISUAL
CJi
,.
i •Vr
- \/ .
B,1NBv SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
CFPANANDSAMRE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED
DRY.WT. PASSING
X OF TOTAL PASSING
3"
1 1/2"
<**
3/4"
^
^
3/8"
^
^~
N0.4
/ 00
WXs
SIEVINR TIUP
SAMPLE WEIGHTS -••
WET DRY
TOTAL
fi A LI Pi P
RETAINED
ON NO. A •
PASSING
NO. 4 _____ '
r«-c •»-•••.
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVING TIME
SIEVE
NO.
8 (103
16
30 (403
50
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
fe.-2_<^
O.feV
\ .ou
7. .CM
A AH
-|-v\
CL_A3r-^
WEIGHT
PASSING
T%OT°AFL
PASSING/
^)£$
-3 £?
9^ '
% ' '/
9c? '
^S'
—
—
FACTOR =^ =
IW$oJ
. - MOISTURE DETERMINATION
•
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DBH
WT. DRY SOIL AND DBH
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
•4
MATERIAL
-4
MATERIAL
(L-2.-
*M« 0.
»^?'^ '
J / J f ***
^^ QJ
• ^w
HYGRO.
'MOISTURE
— ^>
^4/4. 2^/
a££3.7}
^>
/
o,i*o4
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
5*0- 3i"
Go.og'
•
pUN ay nTUMUMcien MWMI.TOIO - — r*c*.o iv/f»T^_rn<_ fy *
CYLINinep MO 10 eoe/>ie
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
&
IQ, w
l<,S4f
It. OH
n f^\\-V PATP 12,
1C GRAV
-2?- 2
flTV
5 AMOUNT
D1SPEJJSIN
^ ^ n
TEST TIME
START MIX
STOP MIX
__ ?.f- min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.
20.0
ZO.C
20.0
2 c0
-------
-'HYDROMETER GRADATJON ANALYsfiAUTIQN:
~' -WORKSHEET MATFRlA&Bl
JOB NO. 1
PART
JOB NAME '
PREP.
CALC
HOLE ^* -
DEPTH
SAMPLE
j>^_^-».
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
SAMPLE PREPERATION
sieve SIZE
1 1/2
3/4'
3/8*
NO.4
SIEVING r
SAMPLE HEIGHTS'
OF PAN AM) SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED «•*
TOTAL
SAMPLE
X OF TOTAL PASSING
/OO
RETAINED ---*!tl'J
ON NO. r — •*'-
PASSING
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
WEIGHT
RETAINED
WEIGHT
PASSING
X OF
TOTAL
PASSING
FACTOR =
W
6 (10}
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
16
10 /
MATERIAL
-4
MATERIAL
MYGRO.
MOISTURE
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
30(40)
DISH NO.
O -24
50
Wr.WETSOLANDDBH
100
WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
4.30.
200
WT. DISH
\
PAN
WT. OF DRY SOIL
r w
TOTAL
% MOISTURE
II.Z5'
BUM pv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS '-^^
CYI INOPP Mrt % tPFClF
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
9- '3
3- llf
<•• —
3. /£"
?• /%
°t.^
to. ist
4.30
\l*00
1C GRAV
MTY
2. AMOUNT
BISPERSIN
n
TEST TIME
START MIX
STOP MIX
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.
^D./0
26.0
£0.&
ZOiO
2.2 .n
n.*»
HYD.
READ
ft.O
is-.o
iJt.S*
n.r
9s-.r>
i.n
HYD.*
CORR
—
»"• *5 '
1 1
"
4.*, "
s.o1
R?2S
it
O
FACTOR X CORRECTED REAI
X OF TOTAL PASSING
GRAVEL ^_ X RAMH !rf\ « rL^y-5LrT /9
*S^GL
/•g '
' /
^ '
'0
5" '
2 -^
-«
G A G E N T ' *^ ^° r
-------
-"HYDROMETER
->
-CAUTlOiM:
GRADATJON ANALYSIS MATE^^N
JOB-NO. _Li
PART NO.
JOB MAilff
PREP. BY_fc*fc*.DATE J2^
CALC.
HOLE m-^i* DEPTH
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
SAMPLE NO—OS.
£f
L^^ QlTso
SAMPLE PREPARATION
SIEVS'SIZE :
! 1/2
3/4
NO.4
SAMPLE
OFPAN>WC SAMPLE
WET
WT. OF PAM
DRY WT. RETAINED—— >
TOTAL
SAMPLE
t7t>M
X OF TOTAL PASSING
loo
RETAINED
ON NO. •*
PAWING
RUN BY.
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
S|EV|NQ TIME
SIEVE
NO.
WEIGHT
RETAINED
.WEIGHT
PASSING
% OF
TOTAL
PASSING
FACTOR =
8 (10)
7t-\
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
1
2A
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
30 (40)
5-4-'
DISH NO.
O -
WT. WET SOL AND DGH
.WT. DRY SOC AM3 D6H
200
WT. DISH
i
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
50,4
pyfj Rv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINC
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
r
°s o
~J D
cHoVfo*
/
5^
•
s • ^'
S^S
tl
o
< 0
Ul Z
= W
0 W
«**T!r
H- O-
2 -
i *
§ 2
0 u.
x- O -
R *
0
Ik
•wss^
«*-- /
/8 '
'r '
/27
^ "
b',
3 '
GRAVEL <5I ' it ^^up ^0 «J"ri"Av.eLrr /9 *
« ^wWiNAPo*
il DATE
PARTICLE .
DIAMETER
O.OSO mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
rAi IB
.«.
*
STORAGE LOCATION
£K COMCCTION IMCUACS TtliP, MCM
""• DATE IN:
L-4 (5-8S5 LOCATION
AND OCPLOCULEMT
SUPERVISOR:
-------
HYDROMETER
GRADATJON
WORKSHEET
HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL!
>JOB NO. 1 -*4\^
JOB NAME :
PART NO.
PREP. BY_fe6fc^DATE
CALC.
DEPTH
SAMPLE NO. ftk
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
£r
• i-
SAMPLE PREPERAT10N
SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED
DRY WT. PASSING
X OF TOTAL PASSING
3"
1 1/2"
3/4~
3/«"
•- :• .
s
f
WXr
NO.4 „
-.*
^
'
loo
TOTAL •'":'-- '-'.-^P.'
ft A Ai Pi e w.;-. -rfxn ;•
nu MO! A m;.,J~~'-- ••'"•*•"'
.PASSING " • 7 T
NO. 4 _ ____. _ - -
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS «,rvik,,. T^F
SIEVE
NO.
8 (10)
16
30 (40}
SO
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
o cn
r>.ud
O 4T5
O.l=ft
"2. ^A-^
\v -\"V
t^v.Tl
WEIGHT
PASSING
T»0?/L
PASSING
IOO'
100' ,
99
99'.
44!
77'
FACTOR = S&-S
* Inf
i.^^^ •-•? '•-
. - UCISTURE DETERMINATION
.
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND OGH
WT.ORYSOLANDDCH
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
r - \>r
flftrf'^^^*^?'
*a..\ -
/f.s'r
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
_3r»
^7
^i-^3
4^3.26
— ^
.C/Z3'
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
^t>.3g
/
5^,24>
RUN BY n i unwiwc i cn «r*/*u i *»i«
CYLINO
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
$•£>£
q,0t,
• •"
9*^7
cyj^
9.£&
/o. o7
ly,i2.
j^.^i
ep NO. ^7 c;ppf^|p
0 ^V^ OATP /2-'
TEST TIME
START- MIX
STOP MIX
~ 0.5 min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
,25h 45 min
TE
•° u.
x. O -
0 *
o
<
Ik
DISPERSING AGEN
2.^ ml DAT
*P^SGL
•^ • /
51 '/
37 /
2^" /
/9 '
/^ /
/o '
«BAWC. (p ' * <.AMn 2.2, K :-VLAY-5LIT 77 *'
$ COMMCCTION INCUBCS TC
— • DATE
MK, MCMISOJS, AMD OCTUOCULCMT
IN: QIID
L-* rs-asi LOCATION-
ERVISC
PARTICU
DIAMETEI
T • U 0/6 rJ n r* 0 ^
P rAi IR
0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
».
>B.
-------
GRADATION ANALYSIS
• WORKSHEET
CAUTION: HAZARDOl
MATERIAUJNJJSE
JOB NO.-L^
JOB NAME
PART
P
PREP. BY K*k/v ftATg f2.-lQ-fejfrs
CALC. BY^M CK ED. BY Op ~
HOLEfett.
SAMPLE
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
rv^\xAr We*. .^3
RUN BY.
SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVING
*.
r-
SIEVE SIZE
1 1/2"
3/4
3/a
NO. 4
S AMPLE WEIGHTS
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WET
ORY
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED
\l4.Lfl
TOTAL
SAMPLE
RETAINED
X OF TOTAL PASSING
loo
W%s
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
NO.
SIEVING TIME
WEIGHT
RETAINED
.WEIGHT
PASSING
X OF
TOTAL
PASSING
FACTOR ~
8 (10)
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
16
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
30 (40)
DISH NO.
SO
WT. WET SOL AND OBH
100
4S
WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
200
5%
WT. DISH
52. ^
•2.2.
WT. OF DRY SOIL
r w
X MOISTURE
RUM HV rlTUltwMC 1 CM ANAUTdlo
CYLINO
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
9> 0y
OftOi.
-•P— '
T> • /.
i_D AMOUNT LA
DISPERSIN
2-A n
TEST TIME
START' MIX
STOP MIX
• 8.3 IBIii"
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.
c-
2,0.0
zo.o
£>& • 'O
2.0 « o
11.0
l\.s
HYD.
READ
34.0
2*9, a
^7.0
Zl>0
1^1 .0
IS-O
CORR*
$•?
' '
45 '
s/y
CORR
READ
-
it
0
rt
< a
£ 2
e co
a »
•"Tlr
K-
-------
HYDROMETER
GRADATJON ANALYSIS
WORKSHEET
CAUTION: HAZARDOl
MATERIAL IN USE
JOB NO.
JOB NAME
PREP. BY kAHV nATC
CALC. BY^I^ CKED.
HOLE
DEPTH.
SAMPLE NO._C&-
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED* —
-•». ** *^ «*« jg— ^•^•^•^MT^^ .^^^
^pWW^^^^^H^^^^B^^^^^W^^^B^^^^^^
« OF TOTAL PASSING
— O
3"
1 1/2"
3/4"
/CO
3/8"
f,3f-
?^'
NO. 4
/s;o,
^'
W»r
SIEVING TIMP
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
WET DRY
• • •
TOTAL ' T. '. Jar f
SAUPLE *&iAJ»o
RETAINED tfA
ON NO. ^ * 15-0
PASSING " &&S'
hlQ. A ^^* v
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS stEX/1Mrt T1Me
SIEVE
NO.
8 CIO)
16
30 (40)
SO
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
I .OT_
2.CTV
^..^
u c^r^
Ita ."Ifs
2.*3.7.S
7±a.V^>
.WEIGHT
PASSING
T«of/L
PASSING
^^/
^o',
^7'
^/'
foZ,y>
50'
—
__ _
FACTOR r •£& =
Wf
f,%S73J . .
- - MOISTURE DETERMINATION
•
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DGH
WT. DRY SOU AND DfiH . -
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
»4
MATERIAL
-4
MATERIAL
rv _\
^3A
^*/Y^o
«^7~TT"^'
•*>! A-
r vu
2I-ZS'
-HYGRO.
MOISTURE
^j*.
"
ZZO 0>7
<2t<*.3£
- . .v
0,%
ttJIM BY
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINO
6lSH N
CLOCK
TIME
*.£7
2. rg
s.s?
9,oz
&s,o
Z\>-0
11.0
i=5 .n
l^.o
CHO^R*
UHH^
~'l
••
II
«5.D
'•
CORR
READ
L
/
it
O
FACTOR X CORRECTED REAt
X OF TOTAL PASSING
*&gg-
^r' ,
3^ ;
^
2S',
n '/
\<5
fiRAVPL Co" X «SAur, ^^ « "H *v.^LrT ^"O «
G AGEN
il DAT
PARTICL!
DIAMETE
T- K'AMAP03
E
5'
0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
CAL1R
•t
QTnoArtP inr.ATinN
3£ COIMCCTION memoes
- DATE IN:_
L-4 (5-85) LOCATION:
. AND DCFLOCULCMT
SUPERVISOR:
-------
HYDROMETER
—•« - "BS&OT1
WORKftUFPT
SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED — -
X OF TOTAL PASSING
.
*?
SAMf
3"
»LE PRE
1 1/2"
•PERATI
3/4"
)00
ON
3/5"
f.sr,
*n'
WXs
N0.4
/* H
<^t| *
SIEVING TW <* '"
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
WET ._. DRY ,
TOTAL " ""!"'" r, ,* &
SAMPLE i/Oi /
RETAINED . > \.
OM MO. A „.,• _,. /i.y
NOSSING ^g^Vf
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVING TIME
WEIGHT
RETAINED
.WEIGHT
PASSING
% OF
TOTAL
PASSING
FACTOR s
8 (10)
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
16
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
.HYDRO.
SAMPLE
30(40)
DISH NO.
CL-A
50
WT. WET SOL AND OBH
100
WT. DRY SOL AlsD DBH
200
WT. DISH
PAN
WT. OF DRY SOIL
= w
50.
TOTAL
% MOISTURE
p,,N Bv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLIND
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
*.T3
f.Hf
— —
S..SS1
^.rg
^.ro*
f.^s1
14. W
10, HO
PP MO l\ ,. gpppip
1C GRA\
/ITY
!? AMOUNT /
DISPERSIN
2. «0 n
•
TEST TIME
START' MIX
STOP MIX
•"•inb min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.
20.0
£0.0
20.0
20 tQ
7.1 . =i
2.\.^
HYD.
READ
aa.C?
\t.o
15.0
I3>.o
!O . O
*?j.O
CORR
/
S'Cj'
•'
r.o'
••
fliSB
it
O
rt
< 0
IU "Z.
« w
0 «g
UJ ^J
*- o-
o _,
s *
5 *-
S o
- :
x- O
R *
^
o
<
Ik
*#SSNGL
5///
»^ •?
<^3 /
/?• '
/4 '
^™j ^
V
GBAVPL rt," * SANO '•' ' '*; "'"I AV.^IT ' «
/5 ftrfp^T-^^/a/V^PO^
il DATE
PARTICLE .
DIAMETER
0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.0 1 9 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
r AI IB
>.
STORAGE LOCATION
COMICCTIOM IMCUAC5 TCM% MCHISCUS.
DATE IN:
OCFLOCULCNT
SUPERVISOR:
L-4 (5-85) LOCATION:
-------
HYDROMETER GRADATJON ANALYSIS
RUN BY.
SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVING
SIEVE SIZE
1 1/2
3/4
3/8
N0.4
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WET
BUY
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED
TOTAL
SAMPLE
X OF TOTAL PASSING
(DO
WX«
BIIM QV SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVING Tiw-=
SIEVE
NO.
8 (10)
16
30(40)
50
100
200
PAN
•^••^^•••MB
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
*-».s-\
-J.14
l^.^^
14= 1^5
•?j-t.\Ti
bQ.C%
.WEIGHT
PASSING
% OF
TOTAL
PASSIN/G
77',
71 '
tn\ ',
3^JI
^ !
\°\ ;
.
FACTOR =J& =
W
- ;^3°^
- - MOISTURE DETERMINATION '\A:
.
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DGH
WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
»4
MATERIAL
"4
MATERIAL
r> -?rr
9S72.4/
jyK-/
V I f'.if
«?»l.-l •
= W
12. XT
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
111.39
!<**.*!
— — •?
/
0,31
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
SD-^^
i/
50,4,4
^UN Rv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINO
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
*•*?
sr. &
*.S7
9,&L
ei. (0
^r.fff
M.£&
10,3*
PP MO ^ SPECIF
r\ JS^', (-p,n-«.*j HATP /2 •
:>C GRAV
2*-?
fITY
ST AMOUNT— G
DISPERSING AGEN
trST" ml DAT
TEST TIME
START' MIX
STOP MIX
n e .•.!•.
1.0 mln
4.0 mln
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TfeMP.
o
/3,o
/// C?
9. 0
-I .0
rtPAVPI 17 ' It CAMO fo /9 *'
PARTICLI
OIAMETE
T LiV*A/4/=>0^
E
I"
O.OSO mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
r AI IR
v
STORAGE LOCATION
comtecnoM IMCUOCS TIMF., MCNHCUS
L-4 (5-85D
DATE IN:_
LOCATION:
. AND OCFIOCULENT
SUPERVISOR:
-------
HYDROMETER
CAUTION: HAZARDOU.
GBADt,TJL°^ALYS'S MATHtlflJNJjS^
JOB NO. _L=
PART
jnn WAUP PDA
PREP.
CALC.
IO -«
HOLEfeH-aM DEPTH_^H
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
SAMPLE NO.
r .C'
\\
fi
B11N BV SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED —
«K^j^^B3W»=-
X OF TOTAL PASSING
— ^>
r .,-
•^*"
3"
1 1/2"
3/4"
/CO
»/8"
ft'l
^
NO.4
*7/-^C^>
^Q"l"\
.WEIGHT
PASSING
X OF
TOTAL
PASSING
7/7
U5 '/
zi ;
31' ,
& *
IT
—
—
FACTOR -^~
f.Slebb' • •
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
.
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DSH
WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
»4
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
f^-tCV
AZ*.A
u?fty
r^&^v\
•5>Z b -^
r W
9+f*
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
— -4v
£77^2*
47^,^
^ • «y
t I
1.Z&
HYDRO.
SAMPLE
S0,tk>
i
$or?z
B^N Ry HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINC
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
g.f'S?
%.*6
2.147
g. SO
<9.o&
*\.<4~!
tj.Q-Z
lo»Sfc]
ep MO. ^-, _ sp££)F
o. "Q-vsN0- PATP /Z/
1C GRAY
i*-*
/ITY
? AMOUNT
CISPERSIN
f2£~ „
TEST TIME
START- MIX
STOP MIX
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.
C»
20'10
-2.0.0
•20,0
2CKP
1\.O
7.\ C5
HYO.
READ
ATo
1*4*9
>2.,0
1/4 1;
Q O
o».o
CH0V«R*
/
5i ^v.
-------
cnen ana associates, inc.
ATTERBERG LIMITS
SSS^
W""- •
"-••vi»-
•r-5?
*••'-*.•
••J-.^,
••' .
•;. •
-*
- *
"fcf
- n
• E
Z
Q
_
m
5
5
. f
i ' i :
. ,•
'
1 ' '
.
•
•
•
.
•
.
: - ;
...
.. ,.
..;
....
;•::
••'
.
•..
....
•
: t
...
,..
it-
. i
'
• i.
• .,
• . i
i
; i
1 i , :
||-
::;.
. •
....
..
....
;ii.
.;•
(;..
1 •
:t
-
• .,
• •
'•
.
LDUDLMT.LL
RUSTIC LMT. PL
FLAsmcnv rcec.
CAUTION: HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL IN USE
10
15 20
30 40 50 60 80 100
PLASTIC UMfT DETERMINATION
TRAY LOCATION
D6HNO.
Wr.OFWETSOLiDBH
WT.OFDRYSOL4DBH _V
WT.OFD&H •?->- .-.•'. - -
WT.OFWATBR '''vjv^?'^^-^----^'" ''
WATB1CCNTe --- ..-
••*-'• -• •:i"f" "
' .-,--•• -MS?
. -..
.:
... rr<>---
Vi^Sf^f
* ^"a£r:;:
..T«;.^-
-.-...
• : ,.- - .
.
••>•• - ^
j .:• .
C"^ .
-.-•^- . *>
-:" LH3 C5-853
-------
*;n«n ana associates, inc.
ATTERBERG LIMITS
CAUTION: HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL IN USE
15 20 .30 40 50 60
->-' ND,OFBLOWS,N
80 100
PLASTIC UMIT DETERMINATION
TRAY LOCATT3N
DBHNa
WT.OFWETSOL4D6H
Wr.OFORYSOL&D6H
.fL£
WT. OF DSH
10 -
•H"-ST
'3,7/7
L-fl C5-853
-------
cnen ana associates, inc.
ATTERBERG LIMITS
UQUD UMTT DETERMWATION
THAYLOCAICN
-to
WT.WET90C4DSH
WT. DRV SOL & OGH
"St.
1 1 .2,2
WT. OF DRY SOL
WATER CONTBir.wX
NaOFBLOWS.N
33
*•• '••
'. .**
J-v:
-£» —
4-
J_
&
13-
LOUDLMT. LL
PLASTCLMT.PV.
Z/,6
7,6
CAUTION: HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL IN USE
TO 15 2D 30 40 SO 60 80 100
- :.:.-:,.-:•» NaOFa.ows.N
:" PLASTIC UMIT DETERMINATION '"= '••",.. '..-
TRAYLOCATCN -r
DBHNa
\VT.OFVVETSOL4DeH
WT.OFDRYSOL4D6H V»
wr.oFDGH :":•'"£'•• - .
WT. OF WATS* -*cl%i_. - '-
WAT® CONTB>
14. 0-/
£0
2/.g7
«^o . &^
ll^fe
-. •• .' •*--~!»rV.
}4»o-/
"—• '.-:-
. -.-•- .-
••
....... .......
•"*•;. •'.•• •-.
. >Ti . : .;r~
*••.'- -^
•-•^t*^r.>:
•:-^«-^':--
...*«w ^j. • .
.... •t*».— — —*-«..
* tijj-i^- " • •;
v JtwMu Urt *s« fc
•AS^ft*^
s?-
L-fl (5-85)
-------
ana associates, inc.
ATTERBERG LIMITS
PART NO L
DEPTH
LJOUD UMfT DETERMMAT1ON
30 405060*80100
.PREP./RUN BY.
CALC. BY.
SAMPLE NO.
v ^..
h^r
UQUDLMT. LL
PLASTIC LMT. PI.
PUSTX^IY ICEX PI
m
CAUTION: HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL IN USE
PLASTC UMfT DETERMINATION
LOCATON
OSHNa
Wr.OFWETSOL&OBH
WT. OF DRY SOL & OGH
W.OFDOH
"•->•*:<
— ^.L-8 C5-853
-------
chen ana associates, inc.
ATTERBERG LIMITS
WORKSHEET
-AK^\ f
JOB
NO..
V
PREP./RUN BY.
NAME
-DATEJ
.CKEO BY.
HOLE.
DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
SAMPLE NO.
I r>
rvvrs^ vV-
UQUD UMIT DETERMMATION
.TOAYLOCATON
O&iNQ.
WT. WET SCX 4 DBH
WT. DRV SOL & OGH
WT.OFOBH
WT.OFWAT5*v
WT. OF DRV SOL
WATH^ CONTENT. w%
NO. OF BLOWS. N
i\ n /
V
, r. L,
,^
I
UOUDLMT.U.
RJVSTICLMT.PI.
PLAsncrrv roex. PI
CAUTiOM:
HAZARDOUS
AL iN u
10 15 20 X 40 50 60
NO. OF BLOWS, N
SO 100
PLASTIC UMIT DETERMINATION
TRAYLOCATDN
OSHNO.
WT. OF WET SOL & OSH
WT. OF DRY SOL & D6H
WT.OFDBH
WT. OF WATER
WATER CONTB/T.W* - Pl_
••
-------
chen and associates, inc.
ATTERBERG LIMITS
WORKSHEET
NO. _L^
JOB NAME. &-&A A-*,
PART NO L
PREP.
BY.
unip &,u . -vs. ^
DEPTH
SAMPLE NO LL
UQUD UMTT DETERMMATION
.TRAYLOCATCN
DBHNa
WT.VMET SOLA OEM
WT. CRY SOL & D&l
WT.OFDBH
WT.OFWATWx
WT. OF DRY SOL
WATB4 CONTENT. wX
NO. OF BU7WS.N
j* / n
Ntr.
f y
/
f
__
I
• • 1
: 1 | i
1.'
-TH+
ill
' : ! '
i • . .
: i 1 .
• . , ,
i • • :
i
....
1 1
[ :
H
1 '
: , .
; : i •
1 : : •
1 •
. ; ,
' i :
. 1 •
: _ ,
• • :
1 -
:
1 ' . '
•
j i i ;
! •
( - •
'
. •!:
i T
i
'.
n
'i''
..,:
'!"
''!
•i|
"il
!>!
;••:.
1 '
...
^1:
• i:>
•••.
• c
•i..
i||:
' II
i
i ! •
-rrt-
i'
' i • '
• • i .
i . r
1 1 : -
'
: 1 .
1,1.
i Ml
T it
+4i-
'I'l
li-
I'l-
I : i •
. - >
!ili
• <<
ij:i
' •',
: ,
:
I •'
llj>
Fii
1"
1 •
"•
')::
•r
'•
i
1 1 •• .
I , ,
i..
• ' •
, - •
t •
I
&•
r
:>'••.
'.'
;:
i,.-
•'!•
"-\
..1
'1.
l'-
lOCUAT.UL
Dl ACTV^fTV *FfY Qt
CAUTION: HA2MKDOUS
MAlERIALINUSE
10 15 20 30 40 50 60
Na OF BLOWS. N
80 KB
PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION
TRAY LOCATON
DCSHNO.
WT. OF WET SOL & DBH
WT.OFDRYSOL&DBH
WT.OFD&I
WT. OF WATER
WATER CONTENT,** - Pl_
-------
Appendix B
BASELINE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
GLT959/020.50-2
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Appendix B
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT
INTRODUCTION
This appendix presents the results of the baseline risk assessment for the G&H
Landfill site. The purpose of the baseline risk assessment is to characterize the
potential human health risk from the G&H Landfill site to support a decision
whether to proceed with a feasibility study of potential remedial actions.
A baseline risk assessment is an evaluation of the potential threats to public
health from the site, in absence of any remedial action (i.e., the no-action
alternative) (U.S. EPA 1988c). It identifies and characterizes the toxicity of
contaminants of concern, the potential exposure pathways, the potential human
receptors, and the extent of expected threat under the conditions defined for the
site.
The no-action alternative assumes that no corrective actions take place and no
restrictions are placed on future use of the site. Based on the definition of no
action, the baseline risk assessment addressed potential risks from the site under
current and feasible future land uses. Evaluation of a no-action alternative is
required under Section 300.68(f)(l)(v) of the National Contingency Plan (NCP)
(U.S. EPA 1985).
BASIS OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT
The baseline risk assessment was performed consistent with the following
guidances and advisories:
B-l
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
U.S. EPA risk assessment guidelines (U.S. EPA 1986a, 1986b,
1986c, and 1986d)
• Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1—Human
Health Evaluation Manual (U.S. EPA 1989d)
Exposure Factors Handbook (U.S. EPA 1989c)
This assessment is based on the following major assumptions:
• No remedial actions
• No land use restrictions, except no development on the landfill due
to geotechnical limitations
• For the purpose of risk calculations, contaminant concentrations
will not change over time
This risk assessment is based on the data collected during Phase III of the
remedial investigation (unless otherwise specified) and is presented in Chapter 3.
Data collected from other phases of the RI are used to support the data from
the Phase III investigations.
ORGANIZATION
This appendix is organized into the following sections:
• Identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern. Identifies the
chemicals evaluated in the assessment.
B-2
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Toxicity Assessment. Summarizes the toxicity of the selected
chemicals and the relationship between magnitude of exposure and
adverse health effects.
• Exposure Assessment. Estimates the magnitude of actual or
potential human exposures, the frequency and duration of these
exposures, and the pathways by which the exposures occur.
• Public Health Risk Characterization. Integrates the toxicity and
exposure assessments to estimate the potential risks to public
health and the environment from exposure to site chemicals.
• Limitations and Assumptions. Summarizes the basic assumptions
used in the risk assessment and limitations of data and
methodology.
Information used to support this risk assessment is presented in the
accompanying appendixes. The method used to assess public health risk is
outlined in Appendix C. The risk calculation data tables are presented in
Appendix D.
IDENTIFICATION OF CHEMICALS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN
The analytical data collected for the site underwent data validation procedures
described in Technical Memorandum No. 10 (Appendix A). After data
validation, the data were reviewed to eliminate results that may represent
contamination of samples in the laboratory or in the field or that failed to meet
B-3
-------
Page 1 of 3
Table B-l
COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY MEDIA
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
POLYNUCLEAR AROMATICS
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
Indeno[ 1 ,2,3-cd]pyrene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS
2 ,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenol
PHTHALATES
B is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
B utylbenzylphthalate
Diethylphthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
D i-n-octy Iphthalate
Surface
Son
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Subsurface
Soil
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(a) Industrial (b)
Leachate Residential Momitoring Surface
Sediments Wells Wells Wells Water
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XX
X
X XX
X X
X XX
X XX
X
XX X
X X
X XX
X XX
X X
X
X
X XX
X
OTHER SEMI-VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
Benzole acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chlorobenzene
4-Chloroaniline
Dibenzofuran
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
Arochlor 1242
Arochlor 1248 X
Arochlor 1254 X
Arochlor 1260 X
X
X
X
X
-------
Page 2 of 3
Table B-l
COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY MEDIA
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Surface
Chemical Soil
PESTICIDES
betaBHC
Chlordane X
4,4-DDE X
4,4-DDT X
delta BHC
Endosulfan I X
Endosulfan II X
Endosulfan Sulfate
gamma BHC(Lindane) X
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide X
BENZENE/TOLUENE/XYLENE (BTX)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Xylenes
OTHER VOLATILES
Styrene
Carbon disulfide
KETONES
Acetone
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
HALOGEN ATED ALKENES & ALKANES
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloroethane
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Subsurface
Soil Sediments
X X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
(a) Industrial
Leachate Residential
Wells Wells
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
00
Momitoring Surface
Wells Water
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
Page 3 of 3
Table B-l
COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY MEDIA
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
INORGANIC CHEMICALS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
DIOXINS and FURANS
Heptachlorodioxin
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
Hexachlorodibenzofuran
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
Pentachlorodibenzofuran
Surface Subsurface
SoU Soil
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
Sediments
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(a) Industrial
Leachate Residential
Wells Wells
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(b)
Momitoring Surface
Wells Water
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(a) Leachate well samples taken from west side of Phase III landfill.
(b) Surface water samples collected from surface water in oil seep area only.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
quality control guidelines (e.g., insufficient surrogate spike recovery). Estimated
results (data with a "J" qualifier) that met data validation requirements were
used in this assessment. Data were also reviewed and eliminated on
consideration of background concentrations.
After this review, 108 chemicals on the U.S. EPA Target Compound List (TCL)
remained. These chemicals are presented by media of occurrence in Table B-l.
From this group of chemicals a subset of chemicals was identified as chemicals
of potential concern to be used in this risk assessment. This subset of
66 chemicals is presented by selection criteria in Table B-2.
Chemicals of potential concern were selected using the following steps:
• All chemicals that had a toxicity value (i.e., slope factor or
reference dose) available through EPA's Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS) (U.S. EPA 1990) or published in the
quarterly Health Effects Summary Table (HEAST) (U.S. EPA
1989e) were identified. Chemicals from this group were eliminated
from consideration if they were detected infrequently (i.e., less than
10 percent of samples in a media) and did not represent chemical
"hot spots" or only detected in an environmental media not
associated with potential exposures at the site.
• Some chemicals were selected if they were lexicologically significant
(e.g., the noncarcinogenic PNAs which may act as cocarcinogens)
even if they did not have a toxicity value
B-4
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table B-2
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN AND SELECTION CRITERIA
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Selection Based on
Toxicity Value or
Current Standard
Selection Based on
Other Factors
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
Aluminum
Anthracene
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benz6[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzole Acid
Beryllium
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
2-Butanone
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroe thane
Chloroform
Chromium
Chrysene
Copper
Cyanide
DDT
Dibenzfa ,h]anthracene
Di-butyl phthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
Diethyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
a/d
b/d
b/d
b/d
c
c
c
c
b
a
a/d
b/d
a/b/d
a/d
a/b
a/b/d
a
a/b/d
a/d
a/b/d
a/b/d
c
a/d
a/d
a/b/d
c
a/d
a/b
b/d
a/b/d
a/d
a/d
a/d
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table B-2
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN AND SELECTION CRITERIA
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Selection Based on
Toxicity Value or Selection Based on
Chemical Current Standard Other Factors
Fluoranthene - e
Fluorene - e
Indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene c e
Iron d
Lead a/d e
Manganese a/d e
Mercury a/d
2-Methylnaphthalene - e
4-Methyl-2-pentanone a
2-Methylphenol a
4-Methylphenol a
Methylene chloride a/b
Naphthalene a e
Nickel a/d e
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine b/d
PCS b/d e
Phenanthrene - e
Phenol a/d e
Pyrene a e
Selenium a/d
Silver a/d
Tetrachloroethene a/b/d e
Toluene a/d e
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane a/d e
1,1,2-Trichloroethane a/b/d e
Trichloroethene b/d e
Vanadium a
Vinyl chloride b/d e
Xylenes a/d e
Zinc a/d e
NOTES:
a - Selected based on having a reference dose value.
b - Selected based on having a cancer slope factor.
c - Selected based on being a carcinogenic PAH, and slope factor based on Benzo[a]pyrene.
d - Selected based on having a current drinking water standard or criteria.
e - Selected based on frequency of occurrence and relative abundance.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Some chemicals were included if they were detected frequently or
of high concentrations even if they did not have a toxicity value.
Chemicals not selected by this screening process are presented in Table B-3.
The absence of these chemicals from the risk assessment does not imply that
exposure to any of these chemicals is without risk. Exclusion of these
compounds, however, should not significantly alter the outcome of the risk
assessment.
TOXICITY ASSESSMENT
Toxicity assessment comprises two general steps. The first step, hazard
identification, is the process of determining what adverse health effects, if any
can result from exposure to a particular chemical. The second step, dose
response evaluation, quantitatively examines the relationship between the level of
exposure and the incidence of adverse health effects in an exposed population.
This section summarizes the lexicological characteristics of representative
chemicals of potential concern at the G&H landfill site. The dose response
relationships for all of the chemicals of potential concern having toxicity values
are summarized.
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
For the purpose of this risk assessment, human health effects are divided into
two broad groups—carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic effects. This division is
based on the mechanism of action currently associated with each category. For
purposes of discussion, chemicals are therefore divided into two groups based on
B-5
-------
Table B-3
CRITERIA FOR THE EXCLUSION OF CHEMICALS FROM THE RISK ASSESSMENT
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Compound
Calcium *
4-Chloroaniline
Chlordane
Cobalt *
DDE
1 ,2,-Dichlorobenzene
2 ,4-Dinitrophenol
Dimethylphthalate *
Dioxins and furans
Endolsulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate *
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
2-Hexanone *
Lindane
Magnesium
Potassium *
Sodium *
Styrene
Thallium
Tin *
Infrequency Low
Of Concentrations Essential
Detection Detected Nutrient
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
Below
Background
Limits
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Concentrations detected in media where no potential
for exposure exists. Higher concentrations in surface
soils detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
* No toxicity value available for this chemical.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
associated effects—carcinogens and noncarcinogens. Some chemicals are
considered to be in both categories.
Carcinogens
Carcinogens are chemicals that cause or induce cancer. Carcinogenic effects
demonstrate a nonthreshold response mechanism. This means there is no level
of exposure (i.e., threshold) to a carcinogen that will not result in the possibility
of developing cancer.
U.S. EPA has developed a carcinogen classification system (U.S. EPA 1986d)
using a weight-of-evidence approach to classify the likelihood that a chemical is
a human carcinogen. Information considered in developing the classification
includes human studies of the association between cancer incidence and
exposure as well as long-term animal studies under controlled laboratory
conditions. Other supporting evidence considered includes short-term tests for
genotoxicity, metabolic and pharmacokinetics properties, lexicological effects
other than cancer, structure-activity relationships, and physical/chemical
properties of the chemical.
Of the chemicals detected at the site, 33 are classified as known (Class A),
probable (Class Bl and B2), or possible (Class C) human carcinogens by the
U.S. EPA Carcinogen Assessment Group. These chemicals and the definitions
of the EPA classification are presented in Table B-4.
Noncarcinogens
Chemicals causing noncarcinogenic effects (i.e., systemic toxins), in contrast,
exhibit a level of exposure from above zero to some finite value that can be
B-6
-------
Tables B-4
CARCINOGENIC POTENCIES
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Arsenic
Benzene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perlyene
Beryllium
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chromium VI
Chyrsene
ODD
DDT
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Indeno[l ,2,3-cd]pyrene
Lead
Methylene chloride
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
PCB
PAHs
1 , 1 ,2,2 Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Oral Route:
Weight-of Slope Factor
Evidence (mg/kg-day)-l
A
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
-
B2
B2
.
C
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2/C
C
B2
C
B2
A
2
0.029
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
-
1.1
0.014
-
-
0.13
0.0061
.
11.5
0.24
0.34
11.5
0.091
0.091
0.6
11.5
-
0.0075
0.0049
7.7
11.5
0.2
0.051
0.057
0.011
2.3
Inhalation Route:
a Weight-of Slope Factor
Source Date Evidence (mg/kg-day)-l
e
IRIS
d
d
d
b
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
-
IRIS
IRIS
-
d
IRIS
IRIS
d
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST(v)
b
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
f
HEAST
e
12-1-88
d
d
d
b
d
9-7-88
3-1-88
8-1-89
9-7-88
-
6-30-88
6-30-88
.
d
8-22-88
8-22-88
d
7-1-89
8-1-89
12-1-88
d
9-26-88
10- -89
3- -88
7- -89
b
3- -88
7- -89
9-26-88
f
7-1-89
A
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
Bl
B2
B2
A
62
-
B2
B2
-
B2
C
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2/C
C
B2
C
B2
A
50
0.029
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
8.4
1.1
-
-
6.1
0.13
0.081
41
6.1
-
0.34
6.1
-
0.091
1.2
6.1
-
0.014
-
-
6.11
0.2
0.0033
0.057
0.017
0.295
Source
IRIS
IRIS
d
d
d
c
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
d
-
IRIS
d
-
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
c
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
f
HEAST
Date
10-1-89
12-1-88
d
d
d
c
d
9-7-88
3-1-88
8-1-89
9-7-88
3-1-88
6-30-88
6-30-88
3-1-88
d
-
8-22-88
d
-
8-1-89
12-1-88
d
9-26-88
10-1-89
3-1-88
7-1-89
c
3-1-88
7-1-89
9-26-88
f
7-1-89
a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document for PAHs. U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Health Effects Assessment for Benzo[a]pyrene. U.S. EPA 1984.
d. Based on bcnzo[a]pyrene.
e. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5 (ug/l)-l. U.S. EPA 1988.
f. Withdrawn from IRIS us of 7-1-89, still listed in HEAST as verified on IRIS on 7-1-89
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
tolerated by the organism without causing an observed health effect. It is
believed that organisms may have adaptive mechanisms that must be overcome
before a toxic endpoint (effect) is manifested. Noncarcinogenic health effects
include a variety of toxic effects on body systems ranging from renal toxicity
(toxicity to the kidney) to central nervous system disorders. Non-carcinogenic
health effects fall into two basic categories—acute toxicity and chronic toxicity.
Acute toxicity occurs after a single exposure (usually at high doses) and the
effect is seen immediately. Chronic toxicity occurs after repeated exposure
(usually at low doses) and is seen weeks, months, or years after the initial
exposure.
Toxicity Profiles
Because of the large number of chemicals associated with the site, this section
presents summary toxicity profiles for a select number of contaminants of
potential concern. These chemicals are representative of the major contaminant
groups present at the site. Summary toxicity profiles are presented in
Table B-5. These profiles describe four categories of potential toxic effects:
acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, and the effects (such as
mutagenicity). Detailed toxicity profiles for these chemicals can be found in the
lexicological literature.
DOSE-RESPONSE EVALUATIONS
Toxicity is dependent upon the dose or concentration of the substance (i.e., the
dose-response relationship). Toxicity values are quantitative expressions of the
dose-response relationship for a chemical. Toxicity values take the form of
reference doses and cancer potency factors, both of which are specific to
exposure routes.
B-7
-------
TableB-5, Page lot7
Table B-S
Summary of Toxicity Profiles of Selected Chemicals
G&H Landfill
Acenaphthene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Toxic by inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure. In
humans, may be irritating to skin and mucous membranes.
Ingestion of large quantities may cause vomiting.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Subchronic oral exposure in laboratory animals has caused
morphological damage to liver and kidneys and mild bron-
chitis.
Cancer Potential
No evidence of carcinogenic effects, but data are lacking.
Antimony
Acute Toxicity Summary
Many antimony compounds irritate the gastrointestinal
tract; antimony tartar has been used as an emetic; intoxi-
cation results in severe vomiting and diarrhea. With occu-
pational inhalation exposures, rhinitis and acute pulmonary
edema may occur.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Inhalation of some antimony compounds can produce
rhinitis, pharyngitis, tracheitis, bronchitis, and pneumoco-
niosis with obstructive lung disease and emphysema.
Transient spots on the skin have been reported in workers.
Antimony may form stibine gas, which causes hemolysis.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Trivalent or pentavalent compounds. In mutation tests,
some antimony compounds were positive in human lym-
phocytes and Syrian hamster embryo cells. Trivalent anti-
mony compounds were used for treatment of parasites.
Arsenic
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute oral exposure can cause muscular cramps, facial
swelling, cardiovascular reactions, severe gastrointestinal
damage, and vascular collapse leading to death. Sensory
loss and hematopoietic symptoms delayed after exposure
to high concentrations are usually reversible. Inhalation
exposures can cause severe irritation of nasal lining, larynx,
and bronchi.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic oral or inhalation exposure can produce changes in
skin, including hyperpigmentation and hyperkeratosis;
peripheral neuropathy; liver injury; cardiovascular disor-
ders; oral exposures associated with peripheral vascular
disease; and blackfoot disease.
Cancer Potential
Known human carcinogen; oral exposures associated with
skin cancer, inhalation exposures with lung cancer.
Other
May be essential. Toxicity varies for different compounds;
inorganic trivalent arsenic compounds usually more toxic
than pentavalent compounds; high doses of some inor-
ganic arsenic compounds to pregnant laboratory animals
produced malformations in offspring.
Barium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Ingestion of barium salts can cause prolonged muscular
stimulation, gastroenteritis, hypokalemia, and cardiovas
cular effects such as ventricular fibrillation and extra systo-
les.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Prolonged occupational inhalation has resulted in barito-
sis—a benign, reversible pneumoconiosis.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Toxicity of compounds depends on solubility.
Benzene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposures (inhalation) to high levels of benzene may
lead to depression of the central nervous system, uncon-
sciousness, and death or may cause fatal cardiac arrhyth-
mias.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Major toxic effect is hematopoietic toxicity (affects forma-
tion of blood); chronic exposure of workers to low levels
has been associated with blood disorders, such as leuke-
mia and aplastic anemia (depression of all three cell types
of the blood in the absence of functioning marrow).
Cancer Potential
Sufficient evidence that benzene is a human and animal
carcinogen; strong correlation between exposure to ben-
zene by inhalation and leukemia.
Other
Chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow and blood have
been reported in experimental animals and some workers.
Benzolajan thracene
Acute Toxicity Summary
No information is available on short-term dermal or inhala-
tion effects.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
No information on systemic effects. PAHs as a group may
cause skin disorders and immunosuppressive effects.
Cancer Potential
Evidence exists that benzo[a]anthracene is carcinogenic to
laboratory animals through dermal and ingestion exposure
routes. Inhalation data is not available. May cause skin and
lung cancer. No reports relating cancer in humans from
exposure to benzo[a]anthracene exclusively, but exposure
from PAH mixtures.
Other
Mutagenic in laboratory experiments. benzo[a]anthracene
may be metabolized into reactive derivatives.
Benzo[a]pyrene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute toxicity appears low when administered by oral or
dermal routes to laboratory animals.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Prolonged exposure may produce chronic dermatitis and
reproductive changes. Repeated oral doses to mice have
caused hyppplastic anemia. Induction of cancer is the key
toxic endpoint from intermediate and long-term exposure.
Cancer Potential
Benzo[a]pyrene is a constituent of coal tar, which is classi-
fied as a Level 1 known carcinogen by IARC and a Level B2
probable carcinogen by the EPA. Ingestion may produce
stomach tumors, and inhalation may produce lung cancer.
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90
-------
Table B-5, Page 2 of 7
Benzo[a]pyrene (Continued)
Prolonged skin exposure has been linked to an increase in
skin cancer among workers.
Other
Benzolalpyrene is considered to be the most potent car-
cinogenic PAH. It is also a mutagen.
Benzo[b]fluoran thene
Acute Toxicity Summary
No information is available.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Systemic effects specific to benzo[b]fluoranthene have
not been reported.
Skin disorders and immunosuppressive effects have been
reported for PAH mixtures.
Cancer Potential
Experimental evidence that it causes lung and skin cancer
in laboratory animals by dermal absorption and intratrach-
eal distillation.
Other
No evidence of reproductive or teratogenic effects.
Beryllium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute lung disease (chemical pneumonitis) has been
observed immediately after inhalation of aerosols of sol-
uble beryllium compounds, such as beryllium fluoride and
compounds (probably zinc beryllium silicate) in broken
fluorescent light tubes. Several months after exposure the
entire respiratory tract may become inflamed with fulmi-
nating pneumonitis in severe reactions. Recoveries usually
occur within weeks, but fatalities have occurred. In studies
with monkeys, high concentrations of aerosols of beryl-
lium fluoride or beryllium phosphate produced severe lung
reactions in all animals and damaged the liver and kidney as
well as affecting adrenals, pancreas, thyroid, and spleen;
many lesions were similar to those in patients who died of
pneumonitis. Conjunctivitis and contact dermatitis may
follow exposure to beryllium, with skin lesions or ulcera-
tiqns. Beryllium compounds may produce hypersensitivity
with delayed allergic reactions.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
The lung is a major target organ for toxic effects of
beryllium. Berylliosis, a chronic granulomatous lung dis-
ease that is frequently fatal, has been described for over 40
years among workers exposed to insoluble beryllium
compounds; symptoms may include shortness of breath,
cyanosis, clubbed fingers, lesions that progress to fibrotic
tissue and nodules with respiratory dysfunction.
Cancer Potential
Beryllium compounds or alloys have produced cancer in
rats, rabbits, and monkeys. Lung tumors have been re-
ported in rats and monkeys exposed by inhalation, intratra-
cheally, or intrabronchial implantation, and bone tumors
have been produced in rabbits after intravenous or intraos-
seus administration. Excess lung cancer has been ob-
served in some studies of workers occupationally exposed
to beryllium, but data on exposure and confounding factors
were lacking. Beryllium and its compounds have been
classified by IARC as having sufficient evidence of being
carcinogenic in animals and limited evidence in humans
(group 2B) and by EPA as B1, probable human carcinogen.
Other
Wide variations in individual sensitivity have been re-
ported, perhaps because of an immune reaction; individu-
als exposed to low doses may exhibit severe effects.
Beryllium is stored in the body for many years with detect-
able amounts in lung reported as long as 23 years after
exposure. Some beryllium compounds are mutagenic in in
vitro tests.
Cadmium
Acute Toxicity Summary
For acute exposures by ingestion, symptoms of cadmium
toxicity included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscular
cramps, salivation, spasms, drop in blood pressure, ver-
tigo, loss of consciousness, and collapse. Acute renal
failure, liver damage, and death may occur. Exposure by
inhalation can cause irritation, coughing, labored respira-
tion, vomiting, acute chemical pneumonitis, and pulmo-
nary edema.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Respiratory and renal toxicity are major effects in workers.
Chronic oral exposures can produce kidney damage. Cad-
mium accumulates in kidney, and nephropathy results
after critical concentration in kidney is reached, probably
about 200 \ig/g. Inhalation can cause chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease, including bronchitis, progressive fibre-
sis, and emphysema. Chronic exposure affects calcium
metabolism and can cause loss of calcium from bone, bone
pain, osteomalacia, and osteoporosis. Chronic exposure
may be associated with hypertension. Cadmium can pro-
duce testicular atrophy, sterility, and teratogenic effects in
experimental animals.
Cancer Potential
Increased risk of prostate cancer and perhaps respiratory
tract cancer in workers exposed by inhalation. No evidence
of carcinogenicity from chronic oral exposure.
Other
A nonessential element.
Carbon Tetrachloride
Acute Toxicity Summary
Fatalities have occurred in humans, with death after inges-
tion of as little as 1.5 ml and average lethal doses of 70 to
140 mg/kg body weight. Exposure to high dosages of
carbon tetrachloride can cause CNS depression. Changes
in the liver of animals have been reported after a single oral
dose and may include rapid lipid accumulation, single cell
necrosis, membrane effects, and liver necrosis within 24
hours, but some changes may be reversed.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Exposure can produce liver and kidney damage in humans.
Classic hepatotoxic, liver necrosis, and fat accumulation
have been reported in humans, monkeys, rats, mice,
rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, cats, dogs, sheep, and
cattle. After inhalation CNS depression, pulmonary edema,
and fatal cardiac arrhythmias have been described. Encepha-
lopathy and neuropathological alterations have also been
observed in rats exposed for several weeks.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogen (liver tumors) in mice and rats; suggestive case
reports of humans exposed to carbon tetrachloride who
develop liver tumors several years later [IARC].
Other
Fetotoxic in mice; retarded development in rats; synergis-
tic with alcohol, producing liver injury.
Chloroform
Acute Toxicity Summary
Anesthetic depresses CNS. Fatalities in humans may be
rapid, resulting from cardiac arrest (apparently sensitiza-
tion to epinephrine) or delayed with kidney and liver dam-
age. Respiratory depression, coma, and liver and kidney
damage are among the symptoms of exposure to chloro-
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90
-------
Table 8-5, Page 3 of 7
Chloroform (Continued)
form. In laboratory animals, acute toxicity depends on
species, strain, sex, and age; liver damage may be cause
of death in rats and mice after acute exposure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Kidney damage (renal tubular necrosis) can occur in mice,
and kidney and liver damage in rats, rabbits, dogs, and
guinea pigs exposed by inhalation.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in mice (hepatomas, hepatocellular carcino-
mas), male rats (malignant kidney tumors), and female rats
(thyroid tumors).
Other
Fetotoxic in rats and rabbits.
Chromium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Major acute effect from oral exposure is renal tubular
necrosis. Inhalation of chromate salts results in irritation
and inflammation of nasal mucosa, ulceration, and perfora-
tion of nasal septum.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic exposure to hexavalent chromium has resulted in
kidney damage in animals and humans. Inhalation expo-
sures to chromates in industrial settings have resulted in
nasal membrane inflammation, chronic rhinitis, laryngitis,
and pharyngitis. Exposures to skin can result in allergic skin
reactions in sensitive individual. Overall, hexavalent forms
are usually more toxic than trivalent forms.
Cancer Potential
Excess lung cancer has been associated with chromate-
producing industry workers. Chromatic salts are carcino-
genic in rats exposed by inhalation.
Other
Essential element. Toxicity is related to valence state.
Chrysene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute toxic effects have not been descried.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chrysene accumulates in adipose and mammary tissues.
Chronic toxic effects have not been described.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in laboratory animals exposed to long-term
dermal doses.
Other
Limited evidence that Chrysene is mutagenic. Epidemiol-
ogical reports incidences of skin cancer when exposed to
PAH mixtures that included chrysene.
Copper
Acute Toxicity Summary
Inhalation of copper dusts result in symptoms similar to
metal fume fever. Exposure to metal fumes results in
upper respiratory tract irritation, metallic or sweet taste,
metal fume fever, and skin and hair discoloration. Exposure
to dusts and mists of copper salt result in congestion of
nasal mucous membranes, sometimes of pharynx, and
occasional ulceration with perforation of nasal septum.
Acute copper sulfate poisoning in humans (oral) some-
times fatal; includes vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension, coma,
and jaundice.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Hemolytic anemia after chronic exposure in some dialysis
patients. Sensitive individuals with disorders of metabo-
lism—Wilson's disease and Menke's disease.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Essential nutrient. Organoleptic threshold in water be-
tween 1 to 5 mg/l.
DDT
Acute Toxicity Summary
In animals, early effects include abnormal susceptibility to
fear, violent reactions to stimuli, motor unrest, hyperirrita-
bility, tremors, convulsions, weight loss and decreased
food intake, and death from respiratory arrest. In humans,
a significant symptoms include paresthesia of mouth, face,
and tongue; dizziness; disturbance of equilibrium; tremors
in the extremities; confusion; malaise; headache; fatigue;
delayed vomiting; and in severe cases, convulsions. Other
effects include motor unrest and tremors that proceed
from fine tremors to coarse tremors with voluntary move-
ments. Onset is 30 minutes to 6 hours after ingestion,
recovery within several days, depending on severity. Fatali-
ties have occurred, usually after suicidal ingestion of un-
known dosesof solutions of DDT. Palpitations and tachycar-
dia have been reported. Mature laboratory animals exhibit
convulsions, increased respiration and heart rate, and
increased sensitivity to low temperatures.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
While the CMS is the principle target for the toxic effects of
DDT and sensory and motor nerve fibers and the motor
cortex are affected, pathologic changes occur in the liver
after chronic or subacute exposures; effects on liver in-
clude enlargement, histologic changes, and centrilobular
necrosis. DDT induces the microsomal enzymes in the
liver thatare responsible for its metabolism. Morphological
changes in kidneys of animals have been observed. In
chickens, DDT injected subcutaneously inhibits testicular
growth and secondary characteristics. Estrogenic effects
have been produced by single or multiple doses in rodents.
DDT can sensitize the myocardium to epinephrine. Similar
effects are seen in single or repeated doses, except
debilitation and malnutrition from starvation may be pro-
duced with chronic exposure.
Cancer Potential
DDT produces liver tumors in mice.
Other
Species differences are marked in susceptibility to acute
poisoning after oral exposure. DDT powder is absorbed
poorly through the skin.
DDT is metabolized to DDE and stored in adipose tissue
and is slowly eliminated in humans. Other metabolites
include ODD and DDA.
Dibenzo[a,h]an thracene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute toxic effects have not been described.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic toxic effects have not been described.
Cancer Potential
I ARC [ 1983] has concluded that there is sufficient evidence
that dibenzo[a,h]anthracene is carcinogenic to laboratory
animals. In laboratory experiments oral doses have caused
tumors in mice, lung tumors in rats by intratracheal
distillation and skin cancer following dermal application.
Other
High doses in laboratory animals have produced fetal
deaths.
GL068800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90
-------
Table B-5, Page 4 of 7
1,1-Dichloroethane
Acute Toxicity Summary
CNS depression may occur when 1,1-dichloroethane is
inhaled at high concentrations. Irritating to skin.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Data limited.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
/, 1-Dichloroethene (Vinylidene
chloride)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Liver appears to be principal target. Biochemical changes
and necrosis in liver in fasted rats have been reported to
develop rapidly after inhalation. Liver damage in fasted rats
can occur after one oral dose. At high concentrations,
inhalation of 1,1 -DCE can cause CNS depression in hu-
mans and unconsciousness.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Described as "exquisite hepatotoxin" because it is more
potent and faster acting than classic hepatotoxin, carbon
tetrachloride. Kidney injury can also occur at relatively low
doses. Reports of health effects on workers exposed to
1,1-DCE include liver function abormalties, headaches,
vision problems, weakness, fatigue, and neurological
sensory disturbances.
Cancer Potential
One group of investigators reported an increased inci-
dence of kidney tumors in mice exposed by inhalation and
possibly mammary tumors in rats. Tumor initiator activity
in mouse skin following several treatments with phorbol as
promoter has been described.
Other
Structure similar to vinyl chloride, a known human carcino-
gen; mutagenic in bacterial tests; may be fetotoxic in
laboratory animals.
1,2-Dichloroethane
Acute Toxicity Summary
CNS depression, lung irritation, and injury to liver, kidney,
and adrenal have been reported. Deaths in humans ex-
posed by ingestion or inhalation may result from circulatory
and respiratory failure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic exposure can cause liver degeneration and kidney
damage in laboratory animals. Eye damage (necrosis of
cqrneal epithelium) has been observed in dogs injected
with 1,2-dichloroethane. Repeated exposures have been
associated with anorexia, nausea, liverand kidney dysfunc-
tion, and neurological disorders in workers.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in mice and rats exposed orally.
Other
Mutagenic in some tests in bacteria, barley, and fruit flies.
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Anesthetic at high concentrations; appears half as potent
as transisomer in depressing CNS; elevated liver enzymes
in rats reported after one exposure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Minimal fatty accumulation in liver of rats chronically ex-
posed to high doses of cis-1,2-DCE in drinking water.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Inhalation exposure to high levels can cause narcosis and
death in rats.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Rats exposed by inhalation exhibited fatty accumulation in
liver and infiltration of lungs.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Dichloromethane (Methylene chlo-
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acts on the CNS, causing narcosis; affects the liver. Fatali-
ties have been associated with acute or prolonged expo-
sure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
In animals chronic exposure can affect the liver and kidney.
Damage to liverand CNS following long-term occupational
exposure has been reported.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogen in laboratory animals.
Other
Mutagenic in some bacterial tests.
Eth yI benzene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Ethylbenzene is irritating to eyes, mucous membranes,
and skin. It can cause headaches and narcosis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Data limited.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Fluoranthene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Toxic by oral and dermal absorption. Can cross epithelial
membranes. A defatting agent that may affect the skin.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Limited information available.
Cancer Potential
IARC [1983] concluded there is no evidence that fluoran-
thene is carcinogenic on the basis of available data.
Other
When applied to laboratory animal skin simultaneously
with other carcinogenic PAHs, has increased the carcino-
genicity of the compound (i.e., cocarcinogenic effects).
Fluorene
Acute Toxicity Summary
May be toxic by inhalation, ingestion, or dermal contact and
absorption.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Limited information available.
Cancer Potential
Data inadequate to determine carcinogenic effects [IARC
1983].
Other
No toxicity data are available for humans.
Lead
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute inorganic lead intoxication in humans is character-
ized by encephalopathy, abdominal pain, hemolysis, liver
damage, renal tubular necrosis, seizures, coma, and respi-
ratory arrest.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic low levels of exposure to lead can affect the
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TO SLM/3-90
-------
Table B-5, Page 5 of 7
Lead (Continued
hematopoietic system, the nervous system, and the car-
diovascular system. Lead inhibits several key enzymes in-
volved in heme biosyntheses. One characteristic effect of
chronic lead intoxication is anemia, by reduced hemoglobin
production and shortened erythrocyte survival. In humans,
lead exposure has resulted in nervous system injury includ-
ing reduced hand-eye coordination, reaction time, visual
motor performance, and nerve conduction velocity. The
developing child appears especially sensitive to lead-in-
duced nervous system injury. Lead can also affect the
immune system and produce gingival lead lines. Epidemi-
ological studies have indicated that chronic lead exposure
may be associated with increased blood pressure in humans.
Exposure to lead is associated with sterility, abortion,
neonatal mortality, and morbidity. Organolead compounds
are neurotoxic.
Cancer Potential
Lead salts have some evidence of carcinogenicity in ani-
mals.
Other
Children are especially sensitive to low level effects.
Manganese
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute inhalation exposures to very high concentrations can
cause manganese pneumonitis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic manganese poisoning results from inhalation of
high concentrations of manganese dust. Chronic manga-
nese poisoning is characterized by psychiatric symptoms,
such as irritability, difficulty in walking, speed disturbances
and compulsive behavior, and by encephalopathy and
progressive deterioration of the CMS. Chronic effects of
manganese poisoning are similar to Parkinson's disease.
Liver changes are also frequently seen. Individuals with an
iron deficiency may be more susceptible to chronic poison-
ing.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Manganese is an essential nutrient. Manganese concen-
trations in water at 50 u.g/1 may exhibit undesirable taste
and discoloration.
Mercury
Acute Toxicity Summary
Inhalation of mercury vapor can cause bronchitis and
nervous system effects. Oral exposure can result in ab-
dominal cramps, gastrointestinal effects, ulceration, shock,
circulatory collapse, and renal failure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Occupational exposure to inorganic mercury can produce
effects on nervous system, including tremors, erethism,
muscular weakness, personality changes, gingivitis, and
colored eye reflex. In children, pink disease has been
reported after ingestion of mercurous compounds. Expo-
sure to organic mercury can cause sensory and visual
disturbances, tingling, paresthesiae, numbness, tunnel
vision leading to blindness, visual, peripheral neuropathy,
weakness in extremities and progressive ataxia, tremor,
cerebral atrophy, degeneration of nerves, and death.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated
Other
Mercury is transferred transplacentally. Toxicity depends
on chemical form. Metallic, organic, and inorganic com-
pounds can be biotransformed.
GL068800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90
Naphthalene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Inhalation of vapor may cause eye irritation, headache, and
confusion. Ingestion may cause abdominal pain, nausea,
and vomiting. Skin or eye contact may lead to systemic
effects such as bladder irritation, kidney effects, and
nemoletic effects such as anemia and decreased hemoglo-
bin. In animal studies, bronchial necrosis was observed in
rats.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Occurrence of cataracts upon naphthalene vapor and dust
exposure has been observed in humans. Subchronic ani-
mal studies have shown that oral doses produced cata-
racts and degeneration of the retina. Dermatitis has been
reported with repeated skin exposure. Two studies have
reported hemolytic anemia in infants born to women
exposed during pregnancy.
Cancer Potential
Studies have not shown that naphthalene is carcinogenic.
Naphthalene is commonly found in coal tar and epidemiol-
ogical studies have shown coal tar to be carcinogenic. The
role of naphthalene alone could not be determined.
Other
Acute exposures to large doses may cause hemolytic
effects (destruction of red blood cells). This effect is most
pronounced in individuals with a hereditary deficiency of
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Nickel
Acute Toxicity Summary
Signs of acute nickel toxicity may include headaches,
nausea, vomiting, chest pain, cough, hyperpnea, cyanosis,
gastrointestinal and CNS effects, weakness, fever, pneu-
monia, respiratory failure, cerebral edema, and death.
Acute exposures to nickel containing dust may result in
chemical pneumonitis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Rhinitis, nasal sinusitis, and nasal mucosal injury are among
the effects reported among workers chronically exposed
to various nickel compounds. Allergic contact dermatitis
and other dermatological effects are the most frequent
effects of dermal exposure to nickel and nickel-containing
compounds.
Cancer Potential
There is extensive epidemiological evidence indicating
excess cancer of the lung and nasal cavity for workers
exposed to certain nickel compounds. Nickel compounds
implicated as having carcinogenic potential include insol-
uble dusts of nickel subsulfide and nickel oxides, vapor of
nickel carbonyl and soluble sulfate, nickel carbonyl.
Other
May or may not be an essential element.
Phenanthrene
Acute Toxicity Summary
An irritant through inhalation and ingestion exposure. May
also be dermally absorbed.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
May be an allergen.
Cancer Potential
Inadequate data forthe evaluation in experimental animals.
Other
Can cause photosensitization of the skin.
-------
Table B-5, Page 6 of 7
Phenol
Acute Toxicity Summary
Corrosive to tissue. Severe eye damage and blindness may
result from direct eye contact. Skin contact may produce
whitening of skin, burn, or systemic poisoning. Paleness,
weakness, sweating, headaches, cyanosis, kidney dam-
age, and death may occur.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic phenol poisoning is rare. It induces vomiting,
difficulty swallowing, diarrhea, lack of appetite, headaches,
fainting, dizziness, and neural disturbances. Liver and
kidney damage may occur.
Cancer Potential
Phenol may promote the effects of certain carcinogens.
Pyrene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Limited information is available.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Limited information is available.
Cancer Potential
Evidence suggests that pyrene is cocarcinogenic in labora-
tory animal experiments.
Poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposure of rats to technical mixtures at high doses
causes diarrhea, loss of appetite, and liver necrosis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Cumulative toxic effects may follow continuous exposure
to low levels. In animals the most notable effects are
alterations to the liver, including liver enlargement, fatty
infiltration, centrilobular neurosis, induction of metaboliz-
ing enzymes, and changes in porphyrin metabolism. Ef-
fects on liver enzymes may alter the toxicity of other
chemicals. Adverse reproductive effects and fetotoxicity
have been observed in animals. Immunosuppressive ef-
fects have also been reported.
Cancer Potential
Rats fed Aroclor 1260 exhibit an increased incidence of
neoplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinomas (liver
tumors), as well as proliferative lesions in the liver.
Selenium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposures can produce CMS effects, including nerv-
ousness, drowsiness, and convulsions, and eye and nasal
irritation.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic exposure to selenium-containing compounds by
inhalation can result in pallor, coated tongue, gastrointes-
tinal disorders, nervousness, garlic breath, liver and spleen
damage, anemia, and mucosal irritation. Discoloration,
decayed teeth, skin eruptions, gastrointestinal distress,
and loss of hair and nails have been reported in humans
exposed orally. In livestock, excess intake can cause blind
staggers—impaired vision, weak limbs, respiratory fail-
ure—and alkali disease—hair loss, sterility, atrophy of
hooves, lameness, and anemia. Embryotoxic and terato-
genic in animals.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in laboratory animals. May be anticarcinc-
genic and protective in humans.
Other
Essential. Toxicity related to chemical form.
Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroeth-
ylene)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Tetrachloroethene can depress the CMS and cause narco-
sis. It is irritating to mucous membranes and skin and can
cause lung edema. Neurological effects on dry-cleaners
have been reported.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic exposure may result in pathological changes in
liver of laboratory animals. It may also affect the kidney. In
humans, inhalation exposure may produce irritation of
respiratory tract, nausea, headache, sleeplessness, and
abdominal pains. Fatalities have been reported.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in laboratory animals. An increased incidence
of cancers among dry-cleaning workers exposed to several
solvents has been described.
Toluene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Humans exposed by inhalation experimentally, occupa-
tionally, or by intentional abuse may exhibit excitation, then
CMS depression and necrosis. Neurotoxic effects include
nausea, fatigue, and coordination at low levels and confu-
sion, ataxia, and weakness at higher levels. In rats, irritation
of mucous membranes and incqordinatipn have been
observed, as well as pulmonary irritation with subchronic
exposure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
CNS effects have been reported in workers, such as
disturbances in memory and thinking, psychomotor skills,
visual accuracy, sensorimotor speed, and performance
tests. Indications of cerebral and cerebellar dysfunction
include tremors, ataxia, and equilibrium disorders, bizarre
behavior, and emotional lobility may occur. In cases of
abuse, changes in liver and kidney function have been
observed. In rats, a decrease in hematocrit has been
reported.
Cancer Potential
Embryotoxicity and possible teratogenicity in mice have
been reported in an abstract. In rats, skeletal retardation of
offspring has been described.
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Acute Toxicity Summary
Trichloroethane is a CNS depressant and may impair psy-
chophysiological functions. Human fatalities have been
reported following deliberate inhalation or occupational
exposures; lung congestion was found.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Exposure by inhalation can produce liver damage in mice
and affects drug metabolism in liver of rats.
Cancer Potential
Mutagenic in some in vitro tests.
Trichloroethene (TCE)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Exposure to TCE can cause depression of the CNS, includ-
ing dizziness, headaches, ^coordination similar to that
induced by alcohol, nausea, vomiting, and unconscious-
ness.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Long-term inhalation exposure can affect liver and kidneys
GLO68800.Afl.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90
-------
Table B-5, Page 7 of 7
Trichloroethene (TCE) (Continued)
in animals. In humans, changes in liver enzymes have been
associated with TCE exposure.
Cancer Potential
Exposure of mice (orally and by inhalation) and rats have
produced increases in liver or lung or kidney tumors.
Other
"Degreasers flush" has been described in TCE-exposed
workers who consume alcohol.
Vinyl Chloride
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute occupational exposure to high concentrations of
vinyl chloride can produce symptoms of narcosis in hu-
mans. Respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, headache,
irritability, memory disturbances, and tingling sensations
may also occur. Deaths have been reported. In animals,
ataxia, narcosis, blood clotting difficulties, congestion and
edema in lungs, and kidney and liver effects have been
demonstrated. At high doses excitement, contractions,
convulsions, and an increase in respiration followed by
respiratory failure precede death.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Human health effects associated with chronic occupa-
tional exposure to vinyl chloride include hepatitis-like liver
changes, decreased blood platelets, enlarged spleens,
decreased pulmonary function, acroosteolyis (sometimes
with Raynaud-like syndrome), sclerotic syndrome, throm-
bocytopenia, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal toxicity,
and disturbances in vision and in the CMS. In laboratory
animals, liver and kidney toxicity may be severe and
histopathological changes in lung and spleen may also
occur with vinyl chloride exposure.
Cancer Potential
Vinyl chloride is a known human carcinogen causing liver
angiosarcomas (a very rare tumor in humans) and possibly
increasing incidence of tumors of the brain, lung, and
hemolymphopoietic system in humans. Vinyl chloride is
carcinogenic in mice, rats, and hamsters.
Other
Vinyl chloride is mutagenic in several test systems. Chro-
mosome aberrations have been reported in exposed
workers. In humans, possible relationships between expo-
sure and birth defects and fetal death have been reported.
Possible increased fetal mortality among wives of occupa-
tionally exposed workers has been debated. Increased
skeletal variants were found in offspring of mice exposed
during gestation.
Xylene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposures to inhaled xylene can depress the CNS
and irritate mucous membranes.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Changes in behavioral tests, manual coordination, balance,
and EEG patterns have been reported in humans exposed
to xylenes. Development of tolerance against some of
these effects has been described. Effects on liver of rats
have been reported.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Zinc
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute adverse effects of zinc include metal fume fever by
the inhalation of fumes. Fever, nausea, vomiting, stomach
cramps, diarrhea may result from acute ingestions.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Prolonged ingestion of zinc can result in irritability, muscu-
lar stiffness and pain, loss of appetite, and nausea. High
levels of zinc in diet may retard growth and produce
defective mineralization of bone.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Essential nutrient. Taste threshold 15 ppm; 40 ppm soluble
zinc salts impart a metallic taste.
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Two primary sources of critical toxicity values were used. The primary source is
the U.S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database
(U.S. EPA 1990). IRIS is the EPA's repository of agencywide verified toxicity
values. If a toxicity value was not available through IRIS, then the latest
available Quarterly Update of the Health Effects Summary Table (HEAST)
issued by the EPA's Office of Research and Development (U.S. EPA 1989e)
was used as a secondary source. The slope factors for arsenic and
benzo[a]pyrene were taken from other U.S. EPA sources (U.S. EPA 1988b and
U.S. EPA 1980, respectively).
Reference Dose for Noncarcinogenic Effects
The toxicity value describing the dose-response relationship for noncarcinogenic
effects is the reference dose (RfD). The U.S. EPA RfD Work Group
(U.S. EPA 1989a) defines RfDs as follows:
In general, the RfD is an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an
order of magnitude) of a daily exposure to the human population
(including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without an appreciable
risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. The RfD is generally
expressed in units of milligram per kilogram of body weight per day
(mg/kg/day).
The RfDs used in this assessment are presented in Table B-6. This assessment
uses the term RfD to describe all of the critical toxicity values for
noncarcinogenic effects. Some of the RfDs listed in the HEAST update have
also not yet undergone the agencywide verification process.
B-8
-------
Page 1 of 3
REFERENCE DOSES
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
ORAL ROUTE:
Acetone
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Benzoic acid
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
2-Butanone
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Carbon disulflde
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
Cyanide
ODD
DDT
Di-n-biitylphthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Reference
Dose(RfD)
mg/kg/day
0.1
0.0004
0.001 e
0.05
4
0.005
0.02
0.05
0.2
0.0005
0.1
0.0007
0.02
0.01
1
0.005
0.037 f
0.02 g
-
0.0005
0.1
0.1
-
Source
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
-
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
-
(a)
Date
7-1-89
3-1-88
7-1-89
8-1-89
8-1-89
9-7-88
8-1-89
3-1-88
7-1-89
10-1-89
2-1-89
6-30-88
7-1-89
6-30-88
8-1-89
3-1-88
7-1-89
9-7-88
-
8-22-88
9-7-88
7-1-89
-
Critical Effect
Increased liver and kidney
weight and nephrotoxicity
Longevity, blood glucose,
and cholesterol
Keratosis and
hyperpigmentation
Increased blood pressure
Human daily per capita
No adverse effects
Increased relative liver
weight
Fetotoxicity in rats
Effects on body weight
gain, testes, liver,
kidney
Significant proteinuria
Fetal toxicity/
malformations
Liver lesions
Liver and kidney effects
Fatty cyst formation in
liver
No effects observed
No effects reported
-
Weight loss, thyroid
effects and myelin
degeneration
-
Liver lesions
Increased mortality
None
-
o>;
UF
1000
1000
-
100
1
100
1000
1000
100
10
100
1000
1000
1000
100
500
-
100
-
100
1000
1000
-
I (c) Confidence
MF inRfD
1 Low
1 Low
-
1 Medium
1 Medium
1 Low
1 Medium
1 Medium
-
1 High
1 Medium
1 Medium
-
1 Medium
10 Low
1 Low
-
5 Medium
-
1 Medium
1 Low
-
-
(d)
-------
Page 2 of 3
Table B-6
REFERENCE DOSES
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Methylene chloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Naphthalene
Nickel
Phenol
Pyrene
Selenium
Silver
1 , 1 ,2,2 Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Reference
Dose(RfD)
mg/kg/day
0.009
0.02
0.8
-
0.1
i
0.2
0.0003
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.4 e
0.02 h
0.6
-
0.003 e
0.003
-
0.01
(a)
Source
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
-
IRIS
-
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
-
HEAST
IRIS
-
IRIS
Date
12-1-88
1-1-89
9-7-88
-
9-7-88
-
7-1-89
7-1-89
10-1-89
7-1-89
1-1-89
1-1-89
7-1-89
3-1-88
6-1-89
-
7-1-89
6-30-88
-
3-1-88
Critical Effect
Hepatic lesions
Increased serum alkaline
phosphatase in male mice
Decreased growth rate,
food consumption and
altered organ weights
-
Liver and kidney toxicity
-
CNS
CNS
Liver toxicity
Increased liver and kidney
weight and nephrotoxicity
Decreased body weights
and neurotoxicity
Decreased body weights
and neurotoxicity
Ocular and internal
lesions
Decreased body and organ
weights
Reduced fetal body weight
in rats
-
Hair and nail loss;
dermatitis
Argyria
-
Hepatotoxicity in mice,
(b)
UP
1000
1000
1000
-
1000
-
100
10
100
1000
1000
1000
100
100
100
-
15
2
-
1000
(c)
MF
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
I
1
1
1
-
3
1
-
-
1
-
1
Confidence
inRfD
Medium
Low
Low
-
Low
-
-
-
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
-
Medium
Low
-
-
Medium
-
Medium
(d)
Toluene
0.3
IRIS
9-7-8
weight gain in rats
LDH levels
Clinical chemistry and
hematological parameters
100
Medium
-------
Page 3 of 3
Zinc
Table B-6
REFERENCE DOSES
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vanadium
Xylenes
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg/day
0.09
,
0.004
-
0.007
2
(a)
Source
IRIS
IRIS
-
HEAST
IRIS
Date
6-1-89
9-26-88 i
-
7-1-89
7-1-89
Critical Effect
Slight growth retardation
in guinea pigs
Clinical serum chemistry
f
None observed
Hyperactivity, decreased
(b)
UF
1000
1000
-
100
100
(c)
MF
1
1
-
-
1
Confidence
in RfD
Medium
Medium
-
-
Medium
(d)
0.2
HEAST
7-1-89
body weight and increased
mortality (males)
Anemia
10
INHALATION ROUTE:
2-Butanone
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Xylenes
0.09
HEAST
0.02 HEAST
2 mg/m3 HEAST(v)
0.3 mg/m3 HEAST(v)
7-1-89
7-1-89
7-1-89
7-1-89
CNS
1000
Liver and kidney effects
CNS effects, eye and nose
irritation
CNS effects, nose and
1000
100
a. Sources of RfD:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989.
b. UF-Uncertainty Factor - Presented on IRIS or HEAST.
c. MF-Modifying Factor - Presented on IRIS or HEAST.
d. Confidence in RfD as presented on IRIS.
e. The oral RfD is being reconsidered by the RfD workgroup.
f. Based on proposed drinking water standard of 1.3 mg/1.
g. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
h. Nickel value based on nickel-soluble salts.
i. AIC for lead listed in the SPHEM (0.0014) withdrawn by EPA.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
RfDs for some inorganic compounds are for specific forms (e.g., hexavalent and
trivalent chromium). The CLP analyses do not, however, report concentrations
of specific forms, but rather give results in terms of total inorganic chemical. In
such situations, it was assumed that, unless otherwise known, the most toxic form
is present and its RfD used.
Slope Factors for Carcinogenic Effects
The dose-response relationship for carcinogens is expressed as a carcinogenic
potency factor or slope factor that converts estimated intakes directly to
incremental lifetime cancer risk. Slope factors are presented in units of the
inverse of milligrams of chemical per kilogram of body weight per day. The
potency factors used in this assessment are summarized in Table B-4.
The data used for estimating the dose-response relationship are taken from
lifetime animal studies or human occupational or epidemiological studies where
excess cancer risk has been associated with exposure to the chemical. In animal
studies, it is assumed that if a carcinogenic response occur at the dose levels
used in the study, then a response will occur at all lower doses. For practical
reasons, low levels of risk cannot be measured directly, either by animal
experiments or epidemiologic studies (U.S. EPA 1984a). Use of cancer potency
factors inherently assumes that cancer risk is probablistic and any degree of
exposure leads to some degree of risk.
The approach used by the U.S. EPA to estimate the carcinogenic potency factor
from animal studies or human data assumes a dose-response relationship with no
threshold. There is uncertainty and conservatism built into EPA's risk
extrapolation approach. EPA has stated that cancer risks estimated by this
method produce estimates that "provides a rough but plausible upper limit of
B-9
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
risk," i.e., it is not likely that the true risk would be much more than the
estimated risk, but it could be considerably lower (U.S. EPA 1985a).
STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
The environmental standards and criteria for groundwater are defined in
Table B-7. U.S. EPA drinking water standards and criteria for the potential
chemicals of concern are presented in Table B-8. Currently, there are no
federal or state standards or criteria for soil.
EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
This section identifies the means by which people can come into contact with
chemicals from the site. It addresses exposures that may result under current
site conditions and from potential uses of the site and the surrounding areas in
the future. This section also identifies the populations at risk, the routes by
which the receptors may become exposed, and the magnitude, frequency, and
duration of the exposures.
EXPOSURE SETTING
This 100-acre site borders on the southwest edge of an expanding urban area.
The current land use is mixed rural, residential, and industrial areas, as
illustrated in Figure B-l. Residential areas are located just east and north of
the site. Small businesses are located adjacent to the east side of the site. The
south side of the site includes a portion of the Utica-Rochester Recreational
Area.
B-10
-------
Table B-7
DEFINITIONS OF STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDEUNES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
(Page 1 of 2)
Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs): MCLs are enforceable drinking water standards
established by U.S. EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act that represent the maximum permissible
level of a contaminant in water that is delivered to any user of a public water system. An MCL is
required to be set as close as feasible to the respective maximum contaminant limit goal (MCLG),
taking into consideration the best technology, treatment techniques, and other factors (including
costs). MCLs are listed at 40 CFR 141.61.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs): MCLGs are nonenforceable drinking water health
goals set by U.S. EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act that are to represent a level presenting
"no known or anticipated adverse effects on the health of persons" while allowing for an adequate
margin of safety. MCLGs were previously termed Recommended Maximum Contaminant Levels
(RMCLs). MCLGs are listed at 40 CFR 141.50.
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels: Secondary MCLs are nonenforceable goals for drinking
water established by U.S. EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act for contaminants that by their
presence in excessive quantities may discourage the utilization of a public water supply because of
such qualities as taste, color, odor, and corrosivity. Secondary MCLs are listed at 40 CFR 143.
Federal Water Quality Criteria (FWQC): FWQC are nonenforceable guidelines developed by
U.S. EPA under the Clean Water Act that are used by the states to set water quality standards for
surface water. EPA develops two kinds of criteria, one for the protection of human health and
another for the protection of aquatic life. FWQC quantitatively address the levels of pollutants in
water which will ensure water quality adequate to support a specified use. These criteria are based
solely on data and scientific judgments on the relationship between pollutant concentrations and
environmental and human health effects and do not reflect considerations of economic or
technological feasibility.
The purpose of FWQC for human health protection is to identify protective levels from two routes of
exposure-exposure from drinking the water and from consuming aquatic organisms, primarily fish.
There are criteria provided for exposure from both routes, and from fish consumption alone. The
criteria identify concentrations equating to specified cancer risk levels (10"4, 10, and 10"') for
carcinogens or threshold-level concentrations for noncarcinogens that represent the water
concentrations that would prevent adverse (chronic toxicity) health effects. There are also non-
health-based criteria for chemicals with organoleptic properties (i.e., taste or odor) representing the
water concentration that would prevent taste or odor concerns.
The FWQC without modification are not appropriate for exposures through groundwater or other
situations where exposure is through drinking water consumption alone. The FWQC values can be
adjusted to reflect only exposure from drinking the water. Adjusted FWQC are presented in the
Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual (U.S. EPA 1986e).
-------
Table B-7
DEFINITIONS OF STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
(Page 2 of 2)
Office of Drinking Water Health Advisories: The health advisories are nonenforceable guidelines
that present the U.S. EPA Office of Water's most recent assessment of concentrations of
contaminants in drinking water at which adverse effects (noncarcinogenic end points of toxicity)
would not be anticipated to occur. A margin of safety is included to protect sensitive members of
the population. These values are subject to change as new health effects information becomes
available. They are specified for 1-day, 10-day, longer term (90 days to 1 year), and lifetime
exposure periods. The lifetime health advisories are not developed for carcinogens.
GLT959/014.50
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table B-8
U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN G & H LANDFILL SITE
All units ug/1 except as noted
(e)
(•) (b) (c)
Maximum Contuninuit Maximum Contunimuit Scconduy Miximum
Level (MCL) Level Goal (MCLO) Contaminant Level (SMCL)
Chemical
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
bis(2-chloromethyl) ether
bis(2-chlorocthyl) ether
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
2-Butanone
Chlorobenzene (mono)
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
1,2-Dichloroetnane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethcne
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Iron
Lead
Mangenese
Mercury
Mcthylene chloride
4-Methylphenol
Nickel
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
PCB
Phenol
Selenium
Styrene
Tetrachloroelhene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes (total)
Zinc
Final
.
50
1000
5
-
-
-
-
-
50
-
-
5
7
-
-
-
50
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
5
2
-
-
Proposed
.
-
5000
-
-
-
-
-
100
100
1300
-
-
-
700
-
-
5
-
2
-
-
-
-
0.5
-
50
5/100 f
5
2000
-
-
10000
-
Final
.
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
0
-
-
Proposed Final Proposed
SO
-
5000 - -
-
-
-
-
.
100 - -
100
1300 1000
h
-
-
700 - 30
- - -
300
20
50
2
- - -
- - -
-
-
0 - -
.
50
0/100 g - 10
0 - -
2000 - 40
_
-
10000 - 20
5000
(d)
Federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria
Toxicity
Protection
.
-
-
-
-
-
21000
-
488
-
-
200
-
-
2400
188
-
50
-
10
-
-
15.4
-
-
3500
10
-
-
15000
-
-
-
5000
10-6 Orgmoleptic
Cancer Risk Criterion
.
0.0025
-
0.67
0.0000039
0.03
-
-
-
-
1000
-
0.94
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.1
-
4.9
0.013
-
-
-
0.88
-
2.8
2
-
-
Office of
Drinking Water
Lifetime Health
Advisories
.
50
1500
NRC
-
-
-
170
300
120
-
154
NRC
7
3400
-
-
20
-
1.1
NRC
-
150
-
-
-
-
140
10
2420
NRC
NRC
400
-
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table B-8
U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN G & H LANDFILL SITE
(a) MCLs are listed at 40 CFR.61 for organic contaminants and 40 CFR 141.62 for inorganic contaminants. Proposed MCLs issued on May 22, 1989 (54 FR 22062) except lead and
copper which were issued August 24, 1988 (53 FR 322S9).
(b) MCLOa are listed at 40 CFR 141.50 for organic chemicals and 40 CFR 141.51 for inorganic chemicals. Proposed MCLOs issued on May 22, 1989 (54 FR 22062) except lead and
copper which were issued August 24, 1988 (53 FR 32259).
(c) They are listed at 40 CFR 143. Proposed SMCLs issued on May 22, 1989 (54 FR 22062).
(d) Federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria (FAWQC). The toxicity protection criteria for noocarcinogenic effects presents concentrations which are not expected to produce adverse
effects in humans. Organoleplic effects are taste and odor problems and are not health based. Published in the "Supcrfund Public Health Evaluation Manual" (U.S. EPA 1986).
(e) A "NRC" is indicated where health advisories have been issued for the chemical for less than lifetime exposures.
(0 EPA proposes MCLs of 100 ug/1 based on a Group C carcinogen classification and 5 ug/l based on a B2 classification.
(g) EPA proposes MCLOs of 100 ug/l based on a Group C carcinogen classification and 0 ug/l based on a B2 classification.
(h) Non-corrosive.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
The site is located on terrain ranging from flat to gently rolling, with mixed
vegetation. Some areas are forested with mature trees and thick underbrush;
other areas are sparsely vegetated. The site was completely fenced in 1987.
The Clinton River is immediately west of the Phase III Landfill and about
l/2 mile south of the site, near Ryan Road. The Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal runs
adjacent to the south side of the site. The depth to the upper aquifer is
approximately 25 feet.
The climate in this area varies seasonally. Annual rainfall is approximately
30 inches (NOAA 1982). On the average, there are 90 days where temperatures
are below 32° F. The wind direction is generally from the southwest during
most of the year and may also be from the west during the months
January through May and October (National Weather Service, Detroit
Metropolitan Airport).
There are approximately 25 private residential and industrial wells east and
north of the site (Figure B-2). Some residences that previously used
groundwater for water supply have been connected to the municipal water
system. There is no restriction, however, preventing residents from using existing
or installing new wells. Businesses located adjacent to the east portion of the
site also have private wells, although they have been connected to the municipal
water supply also. The wells are reported to be used for nonpotable purposes.
EXPOSURE PATHWAY ANALYSIS
An exposure pathway is the means by which a chemical moves from a source to
a receptor. A complete exposure pathway has five elements (Figure B-3):
• A chemical source
B-ll
-------
CO
D
o
_>
o
North
LANDFILL BOUNDARY
U.S. EPA SITE FENCE
GATE
DITCH. STREAM, OR
RIVER
~: TRAIL
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
PHASE I LANDFILL
PHASE II LANDFILL
•••••^••••••••••••••-
Rochester - Utica Recreational Area
22 - MILE ROAD
RAILROAD GRADE
(TRACKS REMOVED)
NOTE: LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
FIGURE B-1
LAND USE MAP
G & H LANDFILL Rl
-------
GLO65561.RI RES WELLS&MUNIP WTR 3-8-90
OIL PONDS & SOLVENT
DISPOSAL AREA
0 500
^•i
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
l;i RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
/Q\ RESIDENTIAL WELL ON
v!i!> MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
;;*; RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING LOCATION
FIGURE B-2
RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
AND WELLS ON MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM
G&H LANDFILLRl
-------
SOURCE
Buried Wastes
RELEASE
MECHANISM
<
I
Rainfall -
Percolation
into Soil
Water
Leaches Out
Contaminants
1
Leachate
Mixes with
Groundwater
TRANSPORT
MEDIUM
Transport
through
Groundwater
to River
EXPOSURE
POINT
I
Offsite Wells
A
A
ROUTE OF
EXPOSURE
i
Ingestion
of
Groundwater
FIGURE B-3
ELEMENTS OF A COMPLEtP
EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
G&HLANDFILLRI
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• A mechanism for chemical release
• An environmental transport medium
• An exposure point (receptor location)
• A feasible route of exposure
Exposure may occur when chemicals migrate from the site to an exposure point
(i.e., a location where receptors can come into contact with the chemicals) or
when a receptor comes into direct contact with waste or contaminated media at
the site. An exposure pathway is complete (i.e., there is an exposure) if there is
a way for the receptor to take in chemicals through ingestion, inhalation, or
dermal absorption of contaminated waste or media.
Based on the analysis of the nature and extent of contamination in Chapter 3,
potential chemical migration discussed in Chapter 4, and a review of the site
setting, potential exposure pathways for the G&H Landfill site were identified
and evaluated for feasibility. These potential exposure pathways are illustrated
in Figure B-4. The analysis of the pathways is summarized in Table B-9. The
following exposure pathways were evaluated as the most feasible exposure
pathways for the G&H site:
• Exposure of site visitors by direct contact (dermal absorption and
incidental ingestion) with contaminated surface soils, sediment, and
oil seeps
• Exposure of site visitors resulting from the inhalation of chemicals
and the oil seeps that have volatilized from buried waste material
B-12
-------
GL065661.RI POT EXP PATH 1 3-14-90
SOURCE
RELEASE
MECHANISM
TRANSPORT
MECHANISM
EXPOSURE
POINT
EXPOSURE
MEDIA
EXPOSURE
ROUTE
PRIMARY
RECEPTOR
SECONDARY
RECEPTOR
| SUBSURFACE SOIL/
BURIED WASTE
Leaching / w Group
oesorption ^ H
1
dwater
ow
r
Discharge To
Surface water
>.
•
>,
Clinton River/Canal •
^-
r>
r>
•>
L>
Groundwater/
Drinking Water
Surface Water
Surface Water
Surface Water
w
>.
1
>,
'
Ingestlon, Dermal
Absorption, Inhalation
(Volatiles)
Ingestlon,
Bloaccumulatlon,
Bloconcentratlon
Ingestion
Ingestlon,
Dermal Absorption
^
>.
>,
Offslte Well Users
Aquatic Organisms
People Playing, Or
Swimming In
Surface Water Bodv
-f
w
^
r>
>.
k
*
Sediments
>,
>,
•
>
Ingestlon,
Dermal Absorption
Ingestlon,
Bloaccumulation,
Bloconcentratlon
. ,
Ingestion,
Dermal Absorption
>.
>,
— >
>.
w
People Pl^ina, Or
Qurfarfl Water ftnrfu
Aquatic Organisms
People Playing, Or
Swimming In
Surface Water Body
>,
>,
-^
w
*
People Consuming
Wildlife From Site
_ . _ . _. .
Caught From Water Body
Wlldlifft Pnncumlnn Fkh
1
People Consuming
Widlife From Site
FIGURE B-4 (Sheet 1 of 2)
POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
G & H LANDFILL Rl
-------
GLO65561.RI POTEXPPATH2 3-14-90
SOURCE
SURFACE SOILS
Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllll
SEDIMENTS
OIL SEEP AREA
Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllll
L
I
RREASE TRANSPORT EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE
MECHANISM MECHANISM POINT MEDIA ROUTE
*. 1 I 1 -IT Wi llr! -"
-f" Volatilisation ^ Wind
r> Onslte > Air (Dust) *\ Inhalation | —
w Wind-Driven w, .., a \ - 1
•* Erosion > ma , ,
>-> Otfslte | > Air (Dust) ^ Inhalation | —
v Direct Contact With Soil v n . k -,,,tiM-nii V lnQesUon
* (No Release and Transport) *" Onslte *• >>urtace ooll f- Demla] Absorption
,-* ««Himont k. Ingesflon, Dermal
-* Sediment * "Absorption
Onslte Ponds
v. nil C0on
w Direct Contact With Sediment w vu^ani , . .
~ (No Release and Transport) ~ Otfslte Ditches ^j Sediment | ^| ingestion —
Canal
w. on seeo Water fe mgestion. uermai
•^ on beep water »• Absorption
PRIMARY
RECEPTOR
.-.^1 ^itn Vkltnrc
1
^ Nearby Residents.
Nearby Businesses
->| Site Visitors
, Nearby Residents,
~* Nearby Businesses
|-> Site Visitors
L>| Terrestrial Wildlife
^^ ,._,.„,
SECONDARY
RECEPTOR
1 w People Consuming
~ WiMlifo Frnm "Jlto
w People Consuming
*" Wildlife From Site
FIGURE B-4 (Sheet 2 of 2)
POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
G & H LANDFILL Rl
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table B-9
ANALYSIS OF EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
O&H LANDFILL SITE
Source Release Mechanism Transport Medium Exposure Point Potential Receptors
Surface Soil Volatilization Air Onsite Site visitors
and dust release
Offsite - bouses Residents
Offsite - businesses Workers
Direct contact
Surface soils Receptor contacts Onsite Site visitors
Runoff Runoff Clinton River
Clinton* Recreational Users
Kalamazoo Canal
Subsurface Soil Volatilization Air Onsite Site visitors
and
Buried Waste
Offsite - bouses Residents
Offsite - businesses Workers
Leaching & Oroundwater Onsite Onsite. well users
desorption
Offsite Existing
groundwatcr users
Offsite Future
groundwater users
Exposure Route
Inhalation
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Inhalation
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Inhalation
Retain ? Rationale
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
Yes Substantial amounts of volatiles
detected in test pits and soil
borings. Site access unrestricted.
Yes Substantial amounts of volatiles
detected in test pits and soil
borings. Residences and businesses
located nearby.
No No current onsite groundwater use.
Site development is not feasible
due to landfill characteristics.
Oroundwater currently used as a
Yes potable water source. Contaminants
detected in groundwater.
No restrictions on groundwater use.
Yes Population increasing in areas
adjacent to site.
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table B-9
ANALYSIS OF EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
O & H LANDFILL SITE
Source Release Mechanism Transport Medium Exposure Point Potential Recepton Exposure Route
Leaching & Oroundwater Clinton River Recreational users Accidental
desorption discharge to Clinton- ingestion
surface water Kalamazoo Canal Dermal absorption
People who consume
contaminated fish. Ingestion
Buried Waste Leaching Leachate Oil Seep Area Site visitors Ingestion
Dermal absorption
People who consume Ingestion
contaminated wildlife.
Onsite Direct contact with onsite sediments Onsite Site visitors Ingestion
Sediments in place Dermal absorption
Retain ? Rationale
No evidence of release of
Yes contaminated groundwater to river/
canal although river and canal are
local discharge points.
People have access to the Clinton
Yes River and fish. Contaminants
detected in the river can not be
attributed to the site.
Yes No restrictions on site access.
Contaminants detected in leachate.
People known to hunt onsite.
Yes Contaminants have been detected in
organisms trapped in areas adjacent
to site, but contaminants can not be
attributed to the site.
Yes No restrictions on site access.
Contaminants detected in onsite
sediments.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Exposure of offsite residential and industrial groundwater users to
chemical in groundwater through the ingestion, dermal absorption,
and inhalation routes of exposure
• Exposure of people engaged in activities along the Clinton River
and Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal by direct contact with surface water
and sediments, if chemicals are released to these water bodies
• Exposure of offsite receptors resulting from the inhalation of
chemicals that have volatilized from buried waste material and
been transported offsite by the wind
• Exposure of people who consume fish and terrestrial wildlife
caught in the vicinity of the site, if chemicals are released from
that site
Site Visitor Exposures
People who gain access to the G&H Landfill site could come into contact with
contaminated media. The frequency, duration, extent, and route of exposure
would depend upon the particular activity of the receptor and location onsite of
the activity.
The site is currently bordered by a chain-link fence but it only limits, and does
not prohibit, site entry. In addition, under the assumption of no action, this
fence and the fence surrounding the Oil Seep Area may not be assumed to be
maintained in the future. Access to the site may also be gained by walking
along the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal (Williams, pers. comm.)
B-13
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Residential communities are adjacent to the site north of 23 Mile Road and east
of Ryan Road. These communities could be one source of visitors to the site.
There are businesses east of the site. It is possible, although unlikely, that
people working in these businesses may also enter the site. The Utica-
Rochester Recreational Area is adjacent to the site to the south. People from
outside the adjacent residential communities could come to the vicinity of the
site because of this recreational area.
Observations made during the site investigations indicated that people have
come onto the site. The site has been known to be a play area for children
(Johnson, pers. comm.). Teenagers and adults may come onto the site to hunt
or hike.
Surface Soil. Most of the site is covered with fill and vegetation that limits
direct contact with the site surface. Chemicals have been detected in some of
the exposed surface soil in samples collected in the Phase I landfill. Site visitors
could come into direct contact with contaminated soil in these exposed areas.
Direct contact with contaminated surface soil could result in exposure through
incidental ingestion and dermal absorption of chemicals.
Wind can release contaminated soil into the air as dust. This is not a major
release pathway for this site because of the limited surface contamination and
cover such as vegetation and fill; thus, it will not be addressed in this
assessment.
Onsite Sediments. Exposure to chemicals in sediments could occur if site
visitors come in direct contact with the sediments. The areas of the site where
contact with sediment could occur include the Oil Seep Area, onsite drainage
ponds, and ditches along the site access road, and sediments in the Clinton-
B-14
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Kalamazoo Canal. Chemicals have been detected in these areas and are
accessible to site visitors. Site visitors may also come in contact with sediment
in the drainage ditches along Ryan Road.
Oil Seeps. Oil seeps are collected in a series of ponds south of the Phase I
landfill. These ponds contain contaminated sediment, water, and oil. Although
the area is fenced, access is possible if individuals break the fence or the fence
is not maintained.
Site visitors in this area may come into direct contact with the contaminated
media in the ponds. The terrain is steeply sloped. It is possible that individuals
walking in the area could stumble and fall into the oil seep ponds.
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in the pond water and
sediment (i.e., chlorinated VOCs and aromatic VOCs). People walking in the
area of the ponds could inhale VOCs released to the ambient air. Odors were
observed in this section during the site investigation. On occasion, air
monitoring performed for personal protection during RI activities did register
VOC concentration above background.
Subsurface Wastes. VOCs were detected in the subsurface soil of the Phase I
landfill during test pitting operations. These chemicals could be released to the
ambient air as a result of volatilization and diffusion. Site visitors could inhale
VOCs released to the ambient air.
Offsite Receptors
People living in the residences adjacent to the site and people working at
business east of the site could be exposed if contaminants migrate from the site.
B-15
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
The potential migration and subsequent potential exposures are described in the
following sections.
Groundwater Users. Human exposure to chemicals in groundwater could occur
if the groundwater is used as a drinking water supply. The main route of
exposure in a residential setting would be through ingestion of water through
drinking and cooking. Dermal absorption could occur during showering or
bathing. Inhalation exposure may occur if volatiles are released from the water
during routine household uses such as cooking, bathing, or showering. Industrial
use of contaminated groundwater could result in exposure through the dermal
absorption and inhalation routes.
Chemicals have been detected in industrial and residential wells east of the site.
In addition, chemicals have been detected in groundwater monitoring wells
located on and surrounding the G&H site. These chemicals have all been
detected in the shallow aquifer. The actual number of households using
groundwater as their drinking water source is unknown. It is estimated that
25 households may be using groundwater, but this number may vary as many are
awaiting hookup to the municipal water system. The rest of the population in
this area uses the municipal water supply. It is anticipated that future residents
in this area will connect to the municipal water supply, although no groundwater
restrictions are in place.
Chemicals have also been detected in the private wells of small businesses
located adjacent to the site. Exposure to chemicals may occur to employees that
work at these facilities. These wells are not used by the employees as a
drinking water source but mainly used for showering and washing equipment.
Airborne Exposures. As discussed in the preceding section, chemicals may be
B-16
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
released from the site to the ambient air through volatilization. They may be
carried offsite by the wind. Residences and businesses are within V* mile to the
site. Exposure could occur if residents or people at the local businesses inhale
the volatile compounds that are released.
Recreational Users of the Clinton River
and Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal
The Clinton River or the Kalamazoo Canal may be discharge points for
groundwater from the site. Runoff from the site also may drain into these water
bodies. Human exposure to chemicals in surface water and sediment may occur
during swimming or other water related recreational activities at these water
bodies.
In previous site investigations, chemicals have been detected in the surface water
and sediments of the Clinton River. However, because of the presence of
another NPL site in the area and other industries, the contamination cannot be
definitively associated with the G&H site. Portions of the Clinton River flow
through the Utica-Rochester Recreation Area. Park users have access to the
river and its sediments when fishing, boating, and swimming.
If chemicals are released to these water bodies, exposure could occur through
dermal absorption and incidental ingestion of chemicals in water. Exposure may
also occur through direct contact with contaminated sediments.
Consumers of Fish and Wildlife
Exposure to chemicals from the site may occur if chemicals are released from
the site to the Clinton River and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal, the fish in these
B-17
-------
AGENCY REVEW DRAFT
waters become contaminated with chemicals through bioconcentration and
bioaccumulation of the chemicals, and people consume the fish. Past studies
conducted by the Michigan DNR have detected chemicals in fish from Clinton
River, although they are not directly attributable to the site.
Human exposure may also occur if terrestrial wildlife become contaminated with
chemicals from the site and people consume the terrestrial wildlife. Hunting is
thought to occur on the site or in the adjacent recreation area. Past studies by
the DNR and CH2M HILL have detected chemicals in wildlife that were
trapped in the G&H study area. Although some of the chemicals detected are
similar to chemicals detected at the site, their presence in the animals collected
is not directly attributable to the site.
Pathways Not Addressed
Some of the pathways identified as potential pathways of concern were not
addressed further in this assessment. These pathways include onsite well users,
future residential development, direct contract with surface soil, and inhalation of
contaminated dust released from surface soil.
Commercial or residential development of this property could result in exposures
of future site occupants if site development exposed buried waste or if
groundwater were used for a water supply. However, future development of the
G&H site, especially in the area of the Phase I Landfill, was not considered
feasible. Geotechnical and safety considerations such as subsidence and
concerns about buildings serving to trap methane released from the landfill make
the development of the site unlikely.
B-18
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Currently, there are no wells onsite used as a potable water source. Because of
the limitation of residential development, future groundwater users onsite would
not be a consideration. However, concentrations of contaminants detected in
monitoring wells were used to estimate risks to potential offsite groundwater
users because of offsite contaminant migration in groundwater.
Direct contact exposure with onsite surface soils in other locations besides the
Phase I Landfill were not addressed. Many of the other areas of the site are
covered with fill and vegetation that limits the potential for direct contact.
However, surface soil data are only available for some areas of the site. A
review of the data indicated that concentrations detected in samples collected
offsite were higher than those detected onsite. For similar reasons, inhalation of
contaminated dust released from the surface soil and potential exposure to site
visitors and offsite residents and visitors was not addressed. The presence of a
cover and vegetation would limit dust release from the surface soil.
QUANTIFICATION OF EXPOSURE
Exposure is defined as the contact of an organism with a chemical or physical
agent. In this assessment, exposure (or intake) is normalized for time and body
weight and is expressed as mg of chemical/kg of body weight/day (mg/kg/day).
The following factors are used to estimate intake, exposure frequency, exposure
duration, contact rate, exposure point concentrations, and body weight. This
section summarizes the exposure factors used in this assessment. The
methodologies for calculating chemical intakes for exposure estimation are
presented in Appendix C.
Recent EPA guidance states that actions at Superfund sites should be based on
an estimate of the "reasonable maximum exposure" expected to occur under
B-19
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
both current and future land use conditions. The reasonable maximum exposure
is defined as the "highest exposure that is reasonably expected to occur at a
site" (U.S. EPA 1989). The intent of the reasonable maximum exposure is to
estimate a conservative exposure case (i.e., well above the average case) that is
still within the range of possibilities. Each exposure factor has a range of
possible values. To the extent possible, this assessment has selected values for
the exposure factors that result in an estimate of the reasonable maximum
exposure.
Based on the analysis of exposure pathways presented earlier in this section, the
exposure pathways were chosen to be were evaluated to determine potential
risks. A summary of the exposure routes to be evaluated are presented in
Table B-10. Some exposure pathways could not be quantitatively evaluated in
the assessment because of inadequate data or information. These pathways will
be addressed in terms of qualitative risks in the Risk Characterization section of
this assessment.
Site Visitor Exposures
The following exposures are estimated to evaluate the potential exposures
associated with access to the site by people:
• Direct contact (i.e., dermal absorption and ingestion) with surface
soil
• Direct contact with sediments
• Direct contact with oil seeps
B-20
-------
Table B-10
EXPOSURE PATHWAYS ADDRESSED
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Receptor/Location
Media
Exposure Route
Quantitative
Assessment
Qualitative
Assessment
Site Visitor/Onsite
Surface Soil
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
X
Oil Seep Sediment
Onsite Pond Sediment
Offsite Ditch Sediment
Canal Sediment
Oil Seep Water
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Inhalation
X
X
X
X
X
Ambient Air
(Volatilization from
Subsurface Soil)
Inhalation
X
Resident/Off site
Groundwater Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Inhalation
X
X
Ambient Air
(Volatilization from
Subsurface Soil)
Inhalation
X
Recreation Users/
Clinton River;
Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal
Wildlife-Fish Consumers/
Onsite and Offsite
Surface Water
Sediment
Wildlife
Fish
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Ingestion
Ingestion
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
• Inhalation of volatile organics released from buried wastes and oil
seeps
The exposure factors used in this assessment to describe these exposures are
given in Table B-ll. They were selected to describe reasonable maximum
exposure situations.
Exposure Frequency and Duration. Exposure of site visitors would be
intermittent. Visitors would not be expected to come on the site daily.
Currently, no standard exposure assumptions have been formulated by U.S. EPA
to describe this type of exposure. Frequency and duration of exposure depend
upon such factors as site access, proximity of site to residential communities or
populations, attractiveness of the site, and climate. Surface soil and sediment
contamination are limited to discreet areas of the site; consequently, the site
visitor may not come into direct contact with contaminants during every site visit.
The actual frequency and duration of contact with contaminated media can not
be precisely estimated. For the purpose of this assessment, several conservative
assumptions were made to describe potential contact with various exposure
media.
Contact with contaminated surface soil and sediment was assumed to occur
25 times per year for 5 years. Inhalation of airborne contaminants was assumed
to occur 25 times per year for 5 years with each site visit lasting approximately 8
hours. Contact with oil seeps (water) could be caused by accidental exposure or
contact (i.e., someone falling into the ponds resulting in full body contact) and
would be limited to a one time exposure. Each of these exposure situations is
intended to describe a reasonable maximum exposure to a site visitor.
B-21
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table B-11
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Exposure Factor
Value
Source
Site Visitor - Soil and Sediment:
Body Weight (average)
Body Weight (child)
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Soil ingestion rate
Site Visitor - Oil Seep Water:
Body Weight (average)
Body Weight (child)
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Water ingestion rate
Water dermal absorption rate
Percent submersed
Duration in water
Site Visitor - Ambient Air:
Body Weight (average)
Hours exposed per day
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Inhalation rate
Offsite Groundwater Use Exposure:
Body Weight (average)
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Water ingestion rate
Water dermal absorption rate
Percent submersed
Bath duration
70-kg
35-kg
25 days
5 years
70 years
0.1 g/day
70-kg
35-kg
1 day
1 year
70 years
0.05 L/day
0.0008 cm/hr
75
10 minutes
70-kg
8 hours
25 days
5 years
70 years
1.4 m3/hour
70-kg
365 days
70 years
70 years
2 liters/day
0.5
75
15 minutes
U.S. EPA 1989
ICRP 1976
a
a
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
ICRP 1976
a
a
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
a
a
U.S. EPA 1989
a
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table B-ll
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Exposure Factor
NOTE:
a. Based on site-specific estimate.
Value
Source
Inhalation Offsite Resident:
Body Weight (average)
Hours exposed per day
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Inhalation rate
70-kg
24 hours
365 days
70 years
70 years
20 m3/day
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Route-Specific Exposure Factors. Table B-ll summarizes the route-specific
exposure factors used to describe exposures to site visitors. Soil and sediment
ingestion rates of 0.1 gram/day are based on current U.S. EPA guidance
(U.S. EPA I989b). It was conservatively (in a health-protective sense) assumed
that the absorption of chemicals bound to soil and sediment is not limited by the
soil/sediment matrix.
Several key assumptions arise concerning dermal absorption of contaminants
from water after an accidental fall into an oil seep pond. It was assumed that,
an individual was to be 75 percent submerged and that, because of wet clothing,
exposure would have a duration of approximately 10 minutes. Because there
are limited data supporting chemical-specific permeability contents, it was
assumed that chemicals would be dermally absorbed from the water at the same
rate as water (U.S. EPA 1989).
The inhalation rates used approximated an adult male engaged in light activities
breathing at a rate of 1.4 m3/hr. (U.S. EPA 1989c).
Exposure Point Concentrations. The surface soil concentrations used were the
highest detected concentrations for PCBs and PNAs detected in the surface soil
of the Phase I landfill (Table B-12). These concentrations are from the
Phase II Remedial Investigation sample results. Highest concentrations were
used due to limited surface soil data available for the site as well as the sparse
distribution of contaminants detected.
Sediment samples were grouped into four separate areas that best illustrate the
distribution of detected contaminants. These areas and sample numbers are
described below.
B-22
-------
Table B-12 (Page 1 of 3)
SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SURFACE SOIL,
SURFACE WATER, AND SEDIMENTS
Media:
Location
Sediments:
Offsite
Drainage
Ditches
Chemical
Aluminum
Arsenic
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Barium
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo[g,h,i]pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
Cadmium
Chloroform
Chromium
Chyrsene
Copper
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
DDT
Di-n-butylphthalate
Indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Pyrene
Selenium
Toluene
Vanadium
Zinc
Number of
Detections
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
4
5
3
1
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
5
5
3
5
5
1
3
5
5
Detection
Frequency %
100
100
100
100
100
100
60
100
80
100
60
20
100
100
100
40
40
10
80
100
100
50
100
100
20
60
100
100
Arithmetic
Mean
Concentration
(ug/lV
6,274
5.78
264
262.8
68
522.8
1.3
742
268.8
109.4
2.2
2.7
31
315.6
53
164
20
137.2
182
183.9
507.8
0.2
26.1
457.6
2.7
40.8
19.9
160.6
S.D.
2,668.4
3.3
262.3
241.8
64.5
504.7
1.0
555.4
189.7
78.7
0.8
0.8
20.8
293.9
34.5
25.6
15.9
56.5
107.4
182.6
205.4
0.1
11.8
423.1
0.5
52.6
7.9
122.8
95%
UCL
8,612.9
8.7
493.9
474.8
124.5
965.2
2.2
1,228.8
435.1
178.4
2.9
3.5
49.2
573.2
83.3
186.4
33.9
186.7
276.1
344
687.8
0.2
36.3
828.4
3.2
86.9
26.8
268.2
Range of
Concentrations
fue/H
2,960-10,900
2.1-11.9
55-730
61-640
32.9-195
84-1,300
0.23-0.61
180-1,700
47-570
39-220
1.2-3
1-5
7.6-68.1
66-750
11-111
120-150
23-50
68-185
47-320
47.7-536
181-778
0.1-0.31
7.3-40.3
88-1,000
1.9-5
8-140
9.3-33.1
27.4-372
-------
Table B-12 (Page 2 of 3)
Media:
Location
Sediments:
Onsite
Ponds Area
Sediments:
Oil Seep
Area
Oil Seep
Water
Chemical
Arochlor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzene
Benzoic Acid
Phenol
Pyrene
Toluene
Arochlor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzene
Butylbenzlphthalate
Ethyl Benzene
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenol
Toluene
Xylene
Arochlor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
Toluene
Xylene
Number of
Detections
2
3
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
Detection
Frequency %
40
60
20
47
20
20
60
100
66
100
66
100
66
66
66
100
100
50
33
50
33
50
Arithmetic
Mean
Concentration
Cue/lV
378.8
294.2
5.6
1,907
366.2
276.2
8.6
31,100
64,000
2,566.6
11,000
12,000
15,000
7,333.3
9,333.3
1,166.6
127,333.3
243,166.7
627,500
180,666.7
1,200
2,983.3
S.D.
309.3
247.9
1.9
1,478.8
117.3
92.7
7.7
30,542.1
53,839.3
1,800.6
3,559.0
9,899.5
10,677.1
2,494.4
5,312.5
623.6
54,658.5
239,389.7
842,064.4
228,322.6
141.42
2,505.6
95%
UCL
681.9
537.2
7.6
3,356.7
481.2
367.1
16.2
65,661.6
124,924.8
4,604.3
15,027.4
23,202.3
27,082.3
10,156.0
15,344.9
1,872.3
189,185.2
434,718.3
1,301,291
363,362.8
1,313.2
4,988.2
Range of
Concentrations
rue/n
125-880
77-710
4-9
130-4,150
530
170
3-22
5,300-74,000
22,000-140,000
700-5,000
8,000-16,000
1,000-25,000
6,000-30,000
4,000-10,000
3,000-16,000
500-2,000
53,000-180,000
5,000-526,000
10,000-1,823,000
10,000-505,000
1,000-1,300
1,000-7,000
-------
Table B-12 (Page 3 of 3)
Media:
Location
Surface
Soil
Sediment:
Clinton-
Kalamazoo
Canal
Chemical
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranathene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Chrysene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
PCBs
Pyrene
4,4-DDE
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo [ajanthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b&k]fluoranthene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzoic Acid
Beryllium
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chloroform
Chromium
Chrysene
Copper
Indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Pyrene
Vanadium
Zinc
Highest Detected15
Concentration
fug/kg)
7,700
6,300
9,000
8,500
4,600
8,000
4,800
1,200
1,730
20,300
28
3,990,000
3,900
39,000
520
150
150
260
78
180
130
99
2
96,000
200
14,100
70
11,100
628,000
10,400
400
14,000
38,900
aCalculation using '/> the detection limit for samples where compound was undetected.
calculations for these compounds are based on highest detected concentrations only.
GLT959/015.50
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Oil Seep Area (Samples: SD01, SD02, SD03)
Onsite ponds and ditches (Samples: SD05, SD06, SD07, SD08,
SD09, SD10)
• Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal (Samples: SD16, SD17)
Offsite drainage ditches (Samples: SDH, SD12, SD13, SD14,
SD15)
The arithmetic average and 95 percent upper confidence limit on the arithmetic
average were calculated for each individual chemical detected in the sediment
samples for each of the four groupings (Table B-12). The 95 percent upper
confidence limit on the arithmetic average chemical concentration for each
contaminant was used to estimate carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks from
direct contact with sediment. Only two samples were collected in the Clinton-
Kalamazoo Canal, so the highest detected concentration for each chemical
detected was used for this area. Only contaminants detected in greater than
10 percent of the samples were used for the evaluation. One half the contract
detection limit was used when the contaminant was listed as "undetected."
Oil seep water samples included the only samples obtained from the Oil Seep
Area. The arithmetic average and the 95 upper confidence limit was calculated
for all contaminants detected in the Oil Seep Area (Table B-12). The 95 upper
confidence limit for each contaminant was the concentration used to estimate
risks from direct contact with surface water.
Air monitoring data obtained during the site investigation was deemed to be of
insufficient quality for the risk assessment. Potential air releases from the buried
B-23
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
wastes were modeled to obtain potential onsite air concentrations. A screening
level (i.e., simple, conservative) modeling approach was used. The modeling
estimated volatile emissions from the Phase I Landfill. Test pit data were used
to describe the source of the volatile chemicals. The 95th percent upper
confidence limit on the arithmetic average chemical concentration in the test pit
samples was used. Volatilization was estimated using a method originally
developed by Farmer (U.S. EPA 1988a). The volatile emissions were convertical
from an emission rate to ambient concentrations above the source area using a
"box model" approach (U.S. EPA 1986f).
The modeling methodology is presented in Appendix C. The modeling is
conservative because it assumes steady-state conditions, a semi-infinite source, no
limitations on emissions from weather, and no limitations on emissions from site
cover material. The modeled air concentrations are presented in Table B-13.
Offsite Receptors-Groundwater Use Setting
Exposure to contaminants through the use of groundwater as a water supply was
estimated for the ingestion, dermal absorption, and inhalation routes of
exposure. The exposure assumptions used to described groundwater use are
summarized in Table B-ll.
Exposure Frequency and Duration. Exposure to a contaminated water source in
a residential setting is a continuous (i.e., daily) type of exposure. In this
assessment, it is assumed that exposures occur every day for an entire lifetime.
This is consistent with past approaches the EPA has used in evaluating risks
from contaminants in drinking water (U.S. EPA 1980).
B-24
-------
Table B-13
MODELED AIR CONCENTRATIONS
G&H LANDFILL SITE
Compound
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene
Airborne
Concentration
On-site
(mg/m3)
4.76E-02
3.08E-04
1.50E-04
2.30E-04
1.31E-04
2.08E-04
8.43E-04
2.24E-04
8.99E-03
3.34E-03
4.70E-03
Airborne
Concentration
at 300 meters
(mg/m3)
2.46E-03
1.59E-05
7.73E-06
1.19E-05
6.78E-06
1.07E-05
4.35E-05
1.15E-05
4.64E-04
1.73E-04
2.42E-04
Based on simple screening level air modeling. See Appendix D.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Recently published national statistics on the number of years spent by an
individual in one residence indicate that the average is 9 years and the
90th percentile figure is 30 years (U.S. EPA 1989d). While this may suggest
that 30 years is the reasonable maximum exposure duration, this assessment
assumed a full lifetime of exposure for consistency with past EPA risk
evaluations. These assumptions were used to estimate risks from contaminants
detected in samples obtained from industrial, residential, and monitoring wells.
Ingestion. This assessment follows the EPA's standard set of exposure
assumptions through ingestion of drinking water (U.S. EPA 1980). By current
U.S. EPA convention, risk estimates were based on the exposure to an adult
consuming 2 liters of water per day.
Dermal Absorption. The assumptions used in this assessment to describe this
exposure route are based on recent EPA guidance and professional judgment.
Dermal absorption exposure is a function of permeability of the skin, surface
area exposed, and length of exposure. Permeability constants are not available
for all contaminants so this assessment assumes that contaminants penetrate the
skin at the same rate as water (U.S. EPA 1989d) and that dermal absorption
exposures occur primarily during bathing, with daily baths lasting an average of
15 minutes (U.S. EPA 1989c). The bather is assumed to be 75 percent
immersed.
Inhalation. There is no standard methodology for estimating the level of volatile
organic chemicals released from drinking water to household air. Empirical
studies based on radon as well as modeling studies (McKone 1987;
Andelman 1986) suggest residents can be exposed to volatile chemicals in
household air throughout the day and throughout the house, not just in the
bathroom during showering or bathing. The level of volatile chemicals in the
B-25
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
indoor air will be a function of water use and insulation of the house. Studies
suggest that exposure of residents to volatile chemicals through the inhalation
route may be within the same order of magnitude as exposure through ingestion
of drinking water (assuming 2 liters of water consumed per day). The estimates
of inhalation exposure compared to ingestion exposure ranged from 25 to
600 percent (McKone 1987). This assessment does not quantify inhalation
exposures. It can be assumed that the exposure of residents to volatile
chemicals through inhalation will be approximately the same level of exposure
predicted to occur through ingestion.
Exposure Point Concentrations. Concentrations from individual, residential, and
industrial wells were used to estimate risks for each well. The concentrations
used for these estimates are presented in Table B-14. Concentrations from each
well were also compared to current drinking water standards and criteria.
Data collected from monitoring wells were used to estimate the potential risks of
current or future populations that would use groundwater as a potable drinking
water source. Although groundwater flow is generally to the south, the effects
of pumping of offsite wells could be to pull contaminants toward those wells.
Therefore, monitoring well data could represent potential offsite chemical
concentrations. Based on information presented in Chapter 3, monitoring wells
were grouped together based on site location, groundwater movement, and
specific source areas. This grouping consisted of five areas and is illustrated in
Figure B-5. The upper 95th percent upper confidence limit of the arithmetic
mean for concentrations detected in each well group was the concentration used
to estimate potential risk. This concentration was used, per current EPA
guidance (U.S. EPA 1989d), due to the great uncertainty when estimating
exposure point concentrations. To estimate this number, the chemical had to be
detected in at least 10 percent of the samples. One-half the contract detection
B-26
-------
Table B-14 (Page 1 of 3)
SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER ONSITE AREAS
Location Chemical
Area 1 1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Butanone
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Carbon disulfide
Chloroethane
Chromium
Cobalt
Di-N-butylphthalate
Diethylphthalate
Ethylbenzene
Lead
Manganese
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Nickel
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Vanadium
Vinyl chloride
Xylene
Zinc
Area 2 Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
Number of
Detections
7
12
9
2
12
6
9
43
45
32
9
9
14
7
12
8
8
13
8
44
6
9
12
6
16
9
10
11
11
3
10
12
7
Detection
Frequency (%)
13
23
17
12
23
11
17
84
93
61
17
17
26
13
25
16
15
26
16
91
11
24
23
11
30
19
20
25
78
42
83
100
58
Mean
Concentration
fug/na
47.3
221.8
20.1
225.9
25.8
37.2
89.1
43.2
634.7
130.7
11.1
45.3
90.8
5.5
21.8
20.9
9.3
189.8
3.2
233.8
9.8
24.1
57.6
8.1
10.7
21.3
112.1
2,589.7
522.5
167.2
59.2
398.4
7.9
s^pj1
188.7
1,164.5
37.3
634.2
83.7
120.3
28.9
53.5
938.7
323.2
20.2
183.2
368.0
1.7
8.8
97.6
18.4
532.8
38
384.8
18.4
16.4
192.2
11.3
18.5
7.7
397.8
13,773.1
639.7
216.3
80.8
229.6
8.0
95%
UCL
98.6
538.3
30.2
536.7
48.5
69.9
98.9
57.9
900.3
218.6
16.1
95.1
190.8
5.9
24.3
47.9
14.3
337.5
4.2
342.6
14.7
29.4
109.8
11.2
15.6
23.5
220.3
6,659.4
857.7
327.4
104.9
528.3
12.5
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
1,250
8,400
160
2,500
100
800
169
307
5,990
1,500
100
1,250
2,500
13.6
54.4
702
100
2,900
29.9
2,060
100
109
1,281
71
100
25
2,500
92,340
1,730
693
316
816
24
-------
Table B-14 (Page 2 of 3)
Location
Area 2
(Continued)
Area 3
Chemical
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Carbon disulfide
Manganese
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Acetone
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
2-Butanone
Butyl benzylphthalate
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chromium
Cobalt
Di-n-Butylphthalate
2,4-DimethyIphenol
Di-Methylphthalate
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Ethylbenzene
Manganese
Nickel
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Zinc
Number of
Detections
1
4
11
6
4
2
1
6
7
6
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
3
Mean
Detection Concentration
Frequency (%)
»' • ^ * ~~
50
33
100
67
33
100
20
85
100
100
56
16
14
14
14
14
14
56
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
100
33
14
14
100
(ug/na
72.5
11.4
367.3
18.9
4.2
117.1
5.8
216.5
23.2
828.9
8.8
37.5
18.6
2.3
5.1
2.4
5.12
16
12
21.4
5.6
13.8
11.7
55.7
3.8
248.1
45.4
5.6
7.7
78.4
S.D.a
678.5
17.6
252.8
7.7
1.2
56.8
1.6
244.3
14.2
481.6
8.3
72.7
33.2
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.3
8.6
17.1
40.2
1.4
21.7
16.5
124.2
3.3
225.7
35.9
1.4
6.6
14.7
95%
UCL
166.1
21.4
516.7
23.9
4.8
197.3
7.2
397.6
33.7
1,214.3
14.9
95.6
41.2
2.7
5.4
2.6
5.4
22.3
24.7
51.3
6.6
29.9
23.9
147.7
6.3
428.6
86.1
6.6
12.6
95
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
140
56
884
35.8
5
175
9
654
44.5
1,470
26
200
100
2.5
6
2.5
5.9
25
54
120
9
67
52
360
12
723
96.3
9
24
95.2
-------
Table B-14 (Page 3 of 3)
Location Chemical
Area 4 Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
bis(2-chloroethyl)Ether
Chloroethane
Manganese
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Area 5 Acetone
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Carbon disulfide
Chromium
Cobalt
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Trichloroethene
Vanadium
Zinc
Number of
Detections
3
20
24
8
7
5
23
5
5
7
2
8
9
11
2
5
2
15
2
1
4
3
4
Mean
Detection Concentration
Frequency (%)
16
83
100
33
29
21
100
33
21
100
13
50
56
100
12
31
12
93
12
12
25
21
100
rue/na
141
18.4
345.2
8.3
5.2
6.2
204.6
18.9
4.5
553.1
4.9
705.2
6.9
192.2
2.6
21.4
24.2
324.2
0.2
23.8
5.4
23.2
350
S.D.a
197.8
13.7
317
15.8
1.7
3.2
267.5
5.3
1
582.3
0.6
1,530.1
3.9
171.1
0.4
40.2
3.9
378.3
0.2
9.9
5.7
5.5
220.6
95%
UCL
232.4
23.8
472
14.7
5.9
7.4
313.9
21.6
4.9
984.6
5.2
1,454.9
8.8
296.9
2.8
41.1
26.1
509.6
0.3
30.7
8.3
26.1
566.1
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
953
46.6
1,440
60
11
17
1,150
32.3
5
1,720
6
6,010
15.7
666
4
170
27.5
1,250
0.9
50.1
22
30
720
aCalculation using '/2 the detection limit for samples where compound was undetected.
GLT959/016.50
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
limit was used in the calculation of average concentrations when a chemical was
reported as "not detected." Since some wells had data from multiple sampling
rounds, the arithmetic average of the detected concentrations for that well was
used. The point concentrations used in the risk estimation are presented in
Table B-14.
Offsite Receptors-Ambient Exposures
The potential exposure of individuals offsite from the release of VOCs from the
landfill was estimated for a hypothetical receptor located 300 meters east of the
site. This is the approximate distance to the nearest residence from the site.
Exposure Frequency and Duration. It was conservatively assumed that a
receptor would be exposed on a continuous basis over a 70 year lifetime. This
assumed that the wind would blow continuously from one direction across the
Phase I landfill. This conservative approach was used as part of a screening
expand level approach.
Exposure Factors. Consistent with EPA guidance (U.S. EPA 1989d) it was
assumed that the typical resident would breathe an average of 20 m3 of air in a
day.
Exposure Point Concentrations. As discussed, air monitoring data obtained
during the site investigation was deemed to be of insufficient quality for the risk
assessment. The modeled estimates of potential air releases used to estimate
potential onsite air concentrations were used as a source of offsite air
concentrations. A simple conservative gaussian dispersion modeling approach
was used to estimate contaminant transport and dispersion. The modeling
methodology is presented in Appendix C. It was assumed that the wind blows
B-27
-------
8
d>
•:. .
!; I02 i'':'':i:!S*'-:-:<:i:«S5:Sf
'
.",« ;Glrl27A
i;: \ •- ":\,.. GH17A.B,C~]ii
•; = AUTOMOBILE
DISPOSAL
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
PHASE I LANDFILL
PHASE iii
LAf4DFILL
GH28A;.B
'
"rf"" PI
' •" iv.'.v.v.-j f-.-.v.:-^ ;.
3H19A.B , ±::trd
;::>... RL17 ::
PHASE ii LANORLL
.
GH40A,B\ "':-:;:ii>:
'""
.. ® GH03A.B.C
f»• •.. ..... .. •
GH34A;B:.,.. " '":"...
•:•'..'.><-• ':"-"---->'GH09A.B.;-..,.." x;':
ROAO-:WV"W<
X
300
LEGEND
«:!:*KKSKS«5«i LANDFILL BOUNDARY
x ......... x .......... x U.S. EPA SITE FENCE
GATE
DITCH, STREAM, OR
• RIVER
TRAIL
RAILROAD GRADE
;; (TRACKS REMOVED)
MONITORING WELL
FIGURE B-5
LOCATIONS AND SAMPLES C
MONITORING WELL AREAS
G & H LANDFILL FS
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
across the landfill in a constant direction, always toward the receptor. It was
also assumed that emissions are not inhibited by weather conditions or site
cover. The offsite concentration estimated represented the highest (i.e., midline)
concentration at the designated downwind location. The estimated offsite air
concentrations are presented in Table B-13.
PUBLIC HEALTH RISK CHARACTERIZATION
This section presents an evaluation of the potential risks to public health
associated with the G&H Landfill site. Exposure settings are evaluated
estimating the carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks associated with the
potential exposures. The estimation of the risks assumed that contaminant
concentrations and intake levels are constant. Where appropriate, exposure
media concentrations are also compared to standards and criteria for the
protection of human health. A discussion of qualitative risks for exposure
pathways identified in the exposure assessment is also presented.
RISK ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY
This section summarizes the approach used in developing the human risk
estimates in this section. A detailed description of the methodologies used in
this assessment are presented in Appendix C.
Noncarcinogenic Effects
Noncarcinogenic risk is assessed by comparison of the estimated daily intake of a
contaminant to its RfD. This comparison serves as a measure of the potential
for noncarcinogenic health effects. The estimated intake of each chemical by an
B-28
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
individual route of exposure is divided by its RfD. The resulting quotients are
termed hazard quotients.
A "hazard index" approach has been adopted to assess the potential for
noncarcinogenic effects posed by exposure to multiple chemicals (U.S. EPA
1986c). This method assumes dose additivity. The hazard quotients are
summed to provide a hazard index. When the index exceeds one, there is a
potential for a noncarcinogenic health risk. If the hazard quotient exceeds one,
the hazard index will exceed one. The hazard index may exceed one even if
individual intakes do not exceed their respective RfDs. In this case, the
chemicals in the mixtures are segregated by similar effect or target organ to
determine potential health risks. Separate indices are derived for each health
effect; if any exceed unity, there is a potential for a noncarcinogenic health risk.
Carcinogenic Effects
The potential for carcinogenic effects is evaluated by estimating excess lifetime
cancer risk. Excess lifetime cancer risk is the incremental increase in the
probability of developing cancer over one's lifetime over the background
probability of developing cancer (i.e., if no exposure to site contaminants
occurs). For example, a 1 x 10"6 excess lifetime cancer risk means that, for
every 1 million people exposed to the carcinogen throughout their lifetimes, the
average incidence of cancer is increased by one case of cancer. Because of the
methods followed by the U.S. EPA in estimating cancer potency factors, the
excess lifetime cancer risks estimated in the assessment should be regarded as
upper bounds on the potential cancer risks rather than accurate representations
of true cancer risk.
B-29
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
While synergistic or antagonistic interactions might occur between carcinogens
and other chemicals at the site, there is insufficient information in the
lexicological literature to predict the health effects of these potential
interactions. Therefore, carcinogenic risks were treated as additive within an
exposure route in this assessment. This is consistent with the current EPA
guidelines on assessment of chemical mixtures (U.S. EPA 1986c).
QUANTITATIVE RISK ESTIMATION
The potential risks associated with G&H Landfill site are quantified in this
section. Based on the analysis of exposure pathways presented earlier in this
assessment, the following exposure pathways were evaluated to determine
potential risks.
Site visitor exposures
Offsite receptors—groundwater use
Offsite receptors—inhalation exposures
Site Visitor Setting
Risk estimates were calculated for the site visitors for direct contact with surface
soil, sediments, oil seep water, and inhalation of volatile chemicals released to
the ambient air from buried waste. A summary of this evaluation is presented
in Table B-15. The risk calculation tables for direct contact exposures are
presented in Appendix D, Tables D-l through D-21. The risk calculation tables
for inhalation exposures are presented in Appendix D, Tables D-49 and 50.
Surface Soil. Estimation of risks from direct contact (incidental ingestion) with
surface soil were calculated. The hazard index for ingestion did not exceed 1;
B-30
-------
Table B-15
SUMMARY OF SITE VISITOR RISKS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Location/Media
Phase I Landfill
Surface Soils
Oil Seep/
Sediments
Onsite Ponds &
Ditches/Sediments
Clinton/Kalamazoo
Canal/Sediments
Offsite Ditches/
Sediments
OU Seep/Water
Phase I Landfill/
Subsurface Soils
Exposure
Pathway
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Inhalation
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk
Major Chemicals *
PNAs
SUM
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Arochlor 1254
SUM
SUM
SUM
PCB
SUM
PCB
SUM
Risk
4E-06
4E-06
IE-OS
4E-06
4E-06
4E-08
1E-07
5E-07
9E-05
9E-05
5E-06
5E-06
7E-08
Chemical
Exceeding
RfD
None
None
None
None
, None
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzl phthalate
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
None
Noncarcinogenic Risk
Hazard Index
Child <0.01
Adult <0.01
Child 0.019
Adult 0.010
Child <0.01
Adult <0.01
Child 0.017
Adult <0.01
Child 0.064
Adult 0.032
Child 96
Adult 48
Child 2.1
Adult 1.0
Adult <0.01
'Chemicals with excess lifetime cancer risks equal to or greater than 1 x 10-6
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
therefore, based on the limited surface soil data, there appears to be no
potential noncarcinogenic health risk from ingestion exposure to surface soils.
Because of the limited surface soil data, the excess lifetime cancer risk was
estimated for ingestion exposure using the highest detected chemical
concentrations detected in surface soil. The carcinogens detected in the soil
were PCBs and PNAs. The excess lifetime cancer risk estimate was 4 x 10"*.
The excess lifetime cancer risk associated with any chemical did not exceed
1 x 10-6.
Sediment Estimation of risks from direct contact (incidental ingestion) with
contaminated sediments was calculated for onsite ponds, the Oil Seep Area,
offsite ditches, and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal.
i.
No hazard indexes exceeded for any of the sediment groups. This indicates that
there are no potential noncarcinogenic risks from ingestion of sediment.
Excess lifetime cancer risks were calculated for ingestion of sediment from each
sediment group. The highest excess cancer risk was 4 x 10"6 for the Oil Seep
Area. The chemical contributing the most to this risk was PCB (Aroclor 1254).
Excess lifetime cancer risk estimates did not exceed 1 x 10"6 for any of the
remaining areas, for which risks ranged from 1 x 10~7 to 4 x 10"8.
Inorganic data were available only for the offsite ditches and the Clinton-
Kalamazoo Canal areas. Risks associated with inorganic contaminants in the oil
seep sediments and onsite ponds cannot be estimated.
Oil Seep Water. Estimation of risks for direct contact with surface water in the
oil seep area were calculated for both ingestion and dermal absorption. All
estimates were based on a single accidental contact with chemicals in the oil
seep surface water. The hazard index exceeded 1 for ingestion exposure for
B-31
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
both child and adult exposure settings. The RfD for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
was exceeded for both child and adult exposure settings.
Excess lifetime cancer risk estimates were calculated for both ingestion and
dermal absorption. The estimate was 9 x 10~5 for ingestion and 5 x 10"6 for
dermal absorption. The chemical contributing the most to the risks was PCB
(Aroclor 1254). Because inorganic data were not available for samples collected
in the surface water, the risks associated with direct contact with inorganic
contaminant in surface water cannot be estimated.
Inhalation of Volatile Compounds. The potential inhalation exposure to a
hypothetical site visitor was estimated. A conservative, simple, screening level
modeling approach was taken to estimate potential ambient air concentrations.
The excess lifetime cancer risk was estimated at 7 x 10"8 and the hazard index
did not exceed 1. Based on this, the inhalation risks to site visitors were
considered too minimal to require a more detailed evaluation.
Offsite Receptors—Groundwater Users
Using a residential exposure setting, contaminants detected in residential,
industrial, and monitoring well samples were evaluated for potential risks.
Estimates were calculated for both ingestion and dermal absorption exposure
routes. The excess lifetime cancer risks from ingestion were approximately
three orders of magnitude higher than those from dermal absorption. Detected
concentrations of contaminants for each well were also compared to current
drinking water standards and criteria.
Residential and Industrial Wells. The calculations of risk based on data from
B-32
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
residential and industrial wells are presented in Appendix D, Tables D-22 to
D-31. A summary of risks from these wells is presented in Table B-16.
Concentrations were detected only in wells from industrial locations. Residential
use exposure assumptions were used to estimate potential risks because it was
the most conservative of potential groundwater use.
No RfDs or hazard indexes were exceeded for any well, indicating no potential
noncarcinogenic risk to groundwater users. The highest excess cancer risk
estimate for ingestion was 2 x 10"4 for groundwater in well GR-01. The
contaminants contributing the most to this risk estimate were vinyl chloride,
trichloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethane, and 1,1-dichloroethene. Groundwater from
the other wells had risk estimates of 1 x W4 (GR-04) and 3 x W6 (GR-03).
The cancer risks from dermal absorption were estimated to be approximately
three orders of magnitude less than risks from ingestion.
Monitoring Wells. The calculation of risks for groundwater from monitoring
wells are presented in Appendix D, Tables D-32 to D-41. These risks are
summarized in Table B-17. Based on the 95 percent upper confidence limit on
the arithmetic average concentrations, groundwater use does not appear to have
a notable potential to result in noncarcinogenic health risks. No estimates of a
chemical's intake by ingestion or dermal absorption routes of exposure exceeded
an RfD. Although the ingestion hazard index for Areas 1 and 3 exceeded 1,
when chemicals are grouped by similar effect, none of the hazard indexes for
these individual effect groupings did not exceed 1.
Two sets of excess lifetime cancer risks were estimated: one including arsenic
and one excluding arsenic. The maximum probable concentration of arsenic in
groundwater for the site is 18 jig/1. This is within the range of background for
arsenic naturally occurring in groundwater. In three of the five areas (Areas 1,
B-33
-------
Table B-16
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER USE RISKS - RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL WELLS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Exposure
Well Pathway
GR-01 Ingestion
GR-01 Dermal Absorption
GR-02 Ingestion
GR-02 Dermal Absorption
GR-03 Ingestion
GR-03 Dermal Absorption
GR-04 Ingestion
GR-04 Dermal Absorption
GR-13 Ingestion
GR-13 Dermal Absorption
Chemical
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk Exceeding
Major Chemicals* Risk RfD
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Benzene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
SUM
SUM
SUM
SUM
1,1-Dichloroethane
SUM
SUM
1,1-Dichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
SUM
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
SUM
SUM
SUM
8E-06 None
9E-06
7E-07
8E-06
1E-04
2E-04
2E-07 None
8E-06 None
IE-OS None
3E-06 None
3E-06
4E-09 None
1E-06 None
1E-04
1E-04
2E-09 None
2E-07
2E-07
2E-07 None
3E-10 None
Noncarcinogenic Risk
Hazard Index
0.011
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.002
<.01
<.01
<.01
Chemicals with excess lifetime cancer risks equal to or greater than 1 x 10-6
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table B-17
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER USE RISKS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Area Exposure Pathway
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk
Major Chemicals Risk
Chemical
Exceeding
RfD
Noncarcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index
(sum for area)
Area 1 Ingestion
Arsenic
Benzene
bis(2-Chlorethyl)ether
1,1 -Dichloroethane
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Vinyl chloride
SUM
Sum w/o Arsenic
3E-03
2E-04
5E-04
3E-04
2E-06
1E-02
None
1.8
1E-02
1E-02
Dermal Absorption
Arsenic
Vinyl chloride
SUM
Sum w/o Arsenic
4E-06
2E-05
3E-05
2E-05
None
<0.01
Area 2 Ingestion
Arsenic
Benzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
SUM
Sum w/o Arsenic
6E-03
IE-OS
7E-05
None
0.7
6E-03
8E-05
Dermal Absorption
Arsenic
SUM
Sum w/o Arsenic
8E-06
None
<0.01
8E-06
1E-07
Area 3 Ingestion
Arsenic
Benzene
SUM
Sum w/o Arsenic
2E-03
IE-OS
None
1.0
2E-03
IE-OS
Dermal Absorption
Arsenic
SUM
Sum w/o Arsenic
3E-06
None
<0.01
3E-06
2E-08
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table B-17
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER USE RISKS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk
Area Exposure Pathway Major Chemicals Risk
Area 4 Ingestion Arsenic 1E-03
Benzene IE-OS
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 2E-04
SUM 2E-03
Sum w/o Arsenic 2E-04
Dermal Absorption Arsenic 2E-06
SUM 2E-06
Sum w/o Arsenic 3E-07
Area 5 Ingestion Arsenic 5E-04
Trichloroethene 3E-06
SUM 5E-04
Sum w/o Arsenic 3E-06
Dermal Absorption
SUM 7E-07
Sum w/o Arsenic 3E-09
Chemical Noncarcinogenic
Exceeding Risk Hazard Index
RfD (sum for area)
None <0.5
None <.01
None 0.7
None <.01
*Chemicals with excess lifetime cancer risks equal to or greater than 1 x 10-6
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
2, and 3) the 95 percent upper confidence limit for arsenic was substantially
above background. In those three areas arsenic is a major contributing
contaminant to the risk estimate. In Areas 4 and 5, where arsenic is within the
range of the calculated background concentrations, the estimate of risk without
arsenic may be more representative of excess carcinogenic risk attributable to
site contaminants in groundwater.
The excess lifetime cancer risks from groundwater ingestion exposure were
estimated to range from 1 x 10"2 (Area 1) to 5 x 10"4 (Area 5) for the sum of
risk including arsenic, and 1 x 10~2 (Area 1) to 3 x 10"6 (Area 5) for the sum of
risk excluding arsenic. In addition to arsenic, benzene, bis(2-ethyhexyl)phthalate,
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, 1,1-dichloroethane, N-nitrosodiphenylamine,
trichlorethene, and vinyl chloride were detected in various groundwater samples
from the five areas in concentrations that were estimated to exceed 1 x 10"6
excess lifetime cancer risk. Dermal absorption risks were approximately three
orders of magnitude less than risks from ingestion.
Comparison to Standards and Criteria. Because the aquifer is used as a
drinking water source the concentrations of chemicals detected in groundwater
samples obtained from residential, industrial, and monitoring wells were
compared to current drinking water standards and criteria.
The comparison of residential and industrial well data to EPA drinking water
standards and criteria is summarized in Table B-18. The MCLG for
trichloethene was exceeded for wells GR-01, GR-02, GR-03, and GR-13. The
MCL for trichlorethene was also exceeded for wells GR-01 and GR-02. The
MCL and MCLG for vinyl chloride was exceeded for GR-01 and GR-04.
B-34
-------
Table B-18
SUMMARY OF RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
WELL CONCENTRATIONS WHICH EXCEED CRITERIA
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Well
Location Chemical
GR01-01 Benzene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
GR02-01 Trichloroethene
GR03-01 Trichloroethene
GR04-01 Vinyl chloride
GR 13-01 Trichloroethene
(a) Criteria
Concentration Criteria Concentration
ug/1 Exceeded ug/1
0.8 MCLG
25 MCL
MCLG
2 MCL
MCLG
8 MCL
MCLG
1 MCLG
2 MCL
MCLG
0.7 MCLG
0
5
0
2
0
5
0
0
2
0
0
(a) Criteria is defined as follows:
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Levels
MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Level Goals
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
The comparison of monitoring well data to EPA drinking water standards and
criteria is presented in Table D-43 through D-47 and summarized in Table B-19.
Numerous criteria were exceeded at various monitoring well locations. The
MCL and Health Advisory for arsenic were exceeded for wells in Areas 1, 2,
and 3. The secondary MCL for iron and manganese was exceeded for wells in
all five areas. Concentrations of vinyl chloride detected in wells from Areas 1,
2, and 4 exceeded both the MCL and MCLG. Benzene concentrations detected
in Areas 1, 2, and 3 exceeded the MCL and MCLG. The MCL for lead was
exceeded in Areas 1, 3, and 5. Other contaminants that exceeded criteria
include PCB (Area 1), barium (Areas 1, 3, and 4), and trichloroethene (Area 5).
Offsite Inhalation Exposures
The potential inhalation exposure to a hypothetical resident was estimated. A
conservative screening level modeling approach was taken. The hazard index
was not exceeded by inhalation. The excess lifetime cancer risk was estimated
at 1 x 10"6. This risk estimate is conservative (i.e., potentially overestimating
risks) for several reasons. The exposure estimate assumed a continuous release
of volatile chemicals from the landfill. This does not address the effect of
£-6-
weather conditions that could limit emissions (*», low temperature, precipitation,
and snow cover). The exposure estimates also assumed that the wind always
blows across the landfill (from the west) toward the receptors. It was further
assumed that receptors are exposed continuously for 70 years. The potential
exposure point air concentrations estimated represent the concentrations along a
centerline of a downwind plume (i.e., the highest potential concentrations). For
these reasons, the offsite receptor risks are likely to be less than 1 x 10"6.
B-35
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table B-19
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS THAT EXCEED
U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS.CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Well Area
Area 1
Phase I Landfill
and
Oil Seep Areas
(52 total wells)
Area 2
Phase II Landfill
(12 total wells)
Chemical
Arsenic
Benzene
Iron
Manganese
Vinyl chloride
Nickel
Xylene
Ethyl benzene
Aroclor 1254
Barium
Aluminum
Toluene
Lead
Trichloroethene
Arsenic
Iron
Manganese
Nickel
Benzene
Vinyl chloride
Aluminum
Xylene
(a)
Criteria
MCL
DW
MCLG
MCL
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
TP
SMCL-Prop
DW
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
MCLG-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCL
MCL
MCLG-Prop
DW
SMCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
MCLG
MCL
DW
SMCL
SMCL
TP
MCLG
MCL
MCLG
SMCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
Criteria
Concentration
(ug/0
50
50
0
5
300
50
0
2
15.4
20
400
10000
10000
30
700
700
0
0.5
1000
5000
5000
1500
50
40
2000
2000
2420
5
20
20
0
50
50
300
50
15.4
0
5
0
50
20
Number of
Wells Exceeding
Criteria
17
17
38
28
46
41
11
9
7
17
12
1
1
14
5
5
10
10
9
3
3
3
4
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
4
4
11
8
3
7
5
1
1
1
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table B-19
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS THAT EXCEED
U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS.CRTTERIA AND GUIDELINES
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Well Area
Area 3
Phase III Landfill
(7 wells total)
Area 4
Clinton/
Kalamazoo Canal
(24 wells total)
Area 5
Automobile
Disposal Yard
(16 wells total)
Chemical
Arsenic
Lead
Aluminum
Barium
Iron
Manganese
Benzene
Nickel
Chloroform
2-Butanone
Iron
Manganese
Benzene
Nickel
Lead
Aluminum
Barium
Vinyl chloride
Iron
Manganese
Trichloroethene
Aluminum
Lead
Chromium
(a)
Criteria
MCL
DW
MCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
TP
MCL
DW
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
TP
MCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL
MCLG
MCL
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
SMCL-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
MCL
MCL
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
Criteria
Concentration
(ug/1)
50
50
5
50
1000
300
50
0
5
15.4
100
170
300
50
0
5
15.4
5
50
1000
0
2
300
50
0
5
50
5
20
20
50
50
100
100
120
Number of
Wells Exceeding
Criteria
1
1
2
6
3
7
7
5
5
1
1
1
19
17
8
4
3
1
2
2
3
3
6
14
4
4
7
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
(a) Criteria abbreviations:
MCL -
MCLG -
SMCL -
DW -
Prop -
TP -
Maximum Contaminant
Maximum Contaminant
Level
Level Goal
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level
Drinking Water Lifetime Health Advisory
Proposed standard or criteria
Ambient Water Quality
Criteria for Toxicity
Protection
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
RISKS NOT QUANTITATIVELY ADDRESSED
Residents Offsite—Inhalation of Dusts
Contaminants have been detected in locations sparsely distributed throughout the
site. Most of the site is capped and vegetated, so the dust may be released
from this area only if the surface is disturbed. The surface soil data is limited
because it was presumed that the site surface would be generally
uncontaminated (i.e., clean cover). The areas of primary concern are the
Phase I Landfill and the Oil Seep Area. Based on the sample analysis, the
contaminants of concern would include inorganic compounds, PCBs, and PNAs.
Recreational Users—Surface Water and Sediments
Contaminants have been detected in the surface water and sediments of the
Clinton River and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal, but they cannot be directly
associated with the G&H Landfill site. Leachate from the Phase III Landfill
may discharge to the wetland area to the west. The wetlands drain into the
Clinton River, and shallow groundwater from the site may discharge to the river
and the canal. Consequently, there are mechanisms for contaminants from the
site to reach these surface water bodies. Although people have access to the
river and canal for recreational activities, the amount of contact that recreational
users may have with the surface water and sediments is not known. There is
not enough information or data to quantify the potential risk from recreational
activities.
B-36
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
People Consuming Fish and Wildlife
There may exist a potential for exposure to site contaminants through the
ingestion of wildlife and fish obtained from the G&H Landfill area. Potential
exposure pathways exist that could allow fish and terrestrial wildlife to come into
contact with contaminants from the site. Wildlife trapped near the area have
been found to contain concentrations of contaminants also detected on the site.
However, due to the home range and habits of the wildlife and the presence of
another NPL site and industry near the site, these contaminants cannot be
attributed only to the G&L Landfill site.
The animals trapped included opossum, raccoon, and muskrat. Actual hunting
and consumption patterns of local resident are not know. If these animals are
hunted only for sport, consumption risks would be negligible.
People fish the Clinton River and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal. Contaminants
have been detected in fish and macroinvertebrate organisms from the Clinton
River. However, while the potential pathways exist for aquatic organisms to be
exposed to site contaminants, the contamination detected in the aquatic
organisms can not be definitely attributed to the site. Consequently, the risks
from consumption of contaminated fish close to the site can not be estimated.
LIMITATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS
UNCERTAINTY FACTORS
Risk assessment as a scientific activity is subject to uncertainty, both with risk
assessment in general (Table B-20) and regarding an understanding of the site
B-37
-------
Table B-20
GENERAL UNCERTAINTY FACTORS
G&H LANDFILL SITE
Uncertainty Factor
Use of cancer potency
factors.
Risks/doses within an
exposure route assumed to be
additive.
Toxicity values derived
primarily from animal studies.
Toxicity values derived
primarily from high doses,
most exposures are at low
doses.
Toxicity values.
Affect of absorption.
Affect of applying critical
toxicity values to soil
exposures.
Estimating inhalation
exposures for released
volatiles.
Effect of Uncertainty
May overestimate risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May overestimate risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
Comment
Potencies are upper 95th percent confidence limits
derived from the linearized model. Considered
unlikely to underestimate true risk.
Does not account for synergism or antagonism.
Extrapolation from animal to humans may induce
error due to differences in absorption,
pharmacokinetics, target organs, enzymes, and
population variability.
Assumes linear at low doses. Tends to have
conservative exposure assumptions.
Not all values represent the same degree of
certainty. All are subject to change as new
evidence becomes available.
The assumption that absorption is equivalent
across species is implicit in the derivation of the
critical toxicity values. Absorption may actually
vary with species and age.
Assumes bioavailability of contaminants sorbed
onto soils is the same as delivered in lab studies.s
Contaminants delivered in studies may be more
bioavailable.
Release and migration of volatiles in the
subsurface soils subject to variability in wind
direction, temperature, and chemical
concentrations.
GLT959/017.50
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
or site-specific uncertainties (Table B-21). This assessment is subject to
uncertainty pertaining to:
• Sampling and analysis
• Fate and transport estimation
• Exposure estimation
• Toxicological data
ASSUMPTIONS
The major assumptions used in this assessment are:
• Contaminant concentrations remain constant over the exposure
period.
• Exposure remains constant over time
• Selected intake rates and population characteristics (weight, life
span, activities) are representative for the potentially exposed
population.
• All intake of contaminants is from the site-related exposure media
and not from other sources (i.e., no relative source contribution).
B-38
-------
Table B-21
SITE-SPECIFIC UNCERTAINTY FACTORS
G&H LANDFILL SITE
Uncertainty Factor
Metals analysis for total
metals only.
Not all chemicals at the site
have toxicity values.
No relative source
contribution is accounted for.
Contaminant loss during
sampling.
Some routes of exposure
were not quantified.
Analysis limited to TCL/TAL
chemicals.
Exposure assumptions.
Exposures assumed constant.
Method detection limits.
Buried waste/remaining
contaminant sources.
Addition of risks across
exposure pathways.
Not all high hazard
metal data received.
Accidental exposure to
surface water based on
toxicity values.
Modeling used to estimate
potential volatile chemical
releases from landfill.
Air transport modeling used
for offsite ambient air
concentrations.
Exposure assumptions for
offsite air exposures.
Effect of Uncertainty
May overestimate risk.
May underestimate risk.
May underestimate risk.
May underestimate risk.
May underestimate risk.
May underestimate risk.
May under- or overestimate
risk.
May under- or overestimate
risk.
May underestimate risk.
May underestimate risk.
May under- or overestimate
risk.
May underestimate risk.
May overestimate risk.
May overestimate risk.
May overestimate risk.
May overestimate risk.
Comment
Did not distinguish between valence or speciation.
Assumed the metal was present in its most toxic
form.
These chemicals are not addressed quantitatively.
Risk summed over media may exceed the
maximum risk posed by one medium. Does not
account for non-site related sources of exposure.
May underestimate VOCs present.
Dermal absorption from soil and sediment not es-
timated.
The TCL/TAL chemicals may represent only a
subset of the toxic chemicals which are present at
the site.
Assumptions regarding media intake, population
characteristics, and exposure patterns may not
characterize exposures.
Does not account for environmental fate, transport,
or transfer which may alter concentration.
For some chemicals (such as benzene), the method
detection limit is above a concentration which
might be of concern.
Future releases could exceed concentrations
detected during the RI.
Some exposure routes have greater uncertainty
associated with their risk estimates than others.
Metal data not received for sediments and surface
water in oil seep area.
Risk based on chronic toxicity values, exposure
would be acute.
Conservative estimation process. Assumed semi-
infinite source, no seasonal reduction in emissions,
no absorption on soil, and no limitation of releases
by soil cover.
Risks based on concentration along a centerline.
Assumed most stable wind conditions, wind
direction constant from one direction, and
continuous emissions.
Exposure estimates assumed continuous exposure
for 70 years.
GLT959/018.50
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
SUMMARY
The baseline risk assessment evaluated the potential public health risks posed by
the G&H Landfill site under the no-action alternative (i.e., no remedial action).
Risks were evaluated under current site conditions with no change in the site
conditions or future use of the site. The results of the baseline assessment are
summarized in Table B-22.
The major exposures pathways for the G&H Landfill site were identified. They
include: exposure of site visitors through direct contact with Phase I Landfill
surface soil, sediments and surface water from the Oil Seep Area^and the use of
contaminated groundwater as a water supply source. Each of these exposure
pathways had lifetime cancer risk estimates that exceeded 1 x 10"6.
Other potential site-related exposures pathways were identified including: the
direct contact with sediments in onsite ponds, offsite ditches, Clinton-Kalamazoo
Canal; the inhalation of volatile chemicals released from subsurface; exposure of
recreational users of the Clinton River and Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal through
contact with surface water and sediments; and ingestion of fish and wildlife from
the area. The risks from contact with these sediments and the inhalation of
volatile chemicals were estimated to be less than 1 x 10"6. The risks associated
with water recreational use and consumption of fish and wildlife could not be
estimated, although these exposure pathways remain a possibility.
GLT959/008.50
B-39
-------
Table B-22
SUMMARY OF HUMAN HEALTH RISKS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Page 1 of 2
Exposure Pathway
Exposure Point
Risk Characterization
Primary Chemicals of Interest
Comments
Site visitors come in
direct contact with
surface soils, onsite
sediments, or exposed
waste (i.e. oil seep)
Onsite
Cancer Risk-Surface Soil
4 X 10-6
Cancer Risk-Sediment in
Oil Seep Area 4 X 10-6
Cancer Risk-Other Onsite
Sediments-ranged from 1 x 10-7
to4X 10-8.
PCBs, PNAs
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
PCB
Surface soil contamination
sparsely distributed in the
Phase I Landfill.
Sediments in oil seep ponds.
Risk doesn't include inorganic
data.
Site visitors inhale
volatile chemicals
released from buried
waste
Onsite
Noncarcinogenic Risks-
Hazard Index < 1
Cancer Risk - Ambient Air
7 X 10-8
No individual chemical intakes
exceeded its RfD.
Risks based on available data;
Inorganic data not received.
Air concentrations based on
conservative screening level
modeling. Exposures likely
to be lower.
Noncarcinogenic Risks -
Hazard Index < 1
No individual chemical intakes
exceeded its RfD.
Air concentrations based on
conservative screening level
modeling. Exposures likely
to be lower.
Site visitors come in
accidental direct contact
with contaminated oil seep
surface water.
Onsite
Ingestion Cancer Risk -
9 X 10-5
Dermal Absorption Cancer Risk •
5 X 10-6
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
PCB
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
PCB
Inorganic chemical data not
received.
Noncarcinogenic Risks -
Hazard Index > 1 for both
ingestion and dermal
absorption.
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
Butylbenzylphthalate
Inorganic chemical data not
received.
-------
Table B-22
SUMMARY OF HUMAN HEALTH RISKS
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Page 2 of 2
Exposure Pathway
Exposure Point
Risk Characterization
Primary Chemicals of Interest
Comments
Release of contaminants
to groundwater used as
drinking water supply
Existing residential,
industrial wells
Cancer risks individual
private wells 1 X 10-4 to
2 X 10-7.
Noncarcinogenic Risks -
Hazard Index < 1
1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene,
1,1-Dichloroethene, Vinyl
Chloride, Trichloroethene
No individual chemical's intake
exceeded its RfD
Risks based on concentrations
detected in industrial wells,
not currently used for
drinking water.
Offsite wells in
future
Cancer risks monitoring wells
range from 1 X 10-2 to
5 X 10-4.
Arsenic, Benzene,
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
1,1-Dichloroethane, Vinyl
Chloride, Trichloroethene,
Bis(2-chloroehtyl)ether,
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Risks include arsenic
concentrations. Current
groundwater use is limited,
but no groundwater use
restrictions in place.
Noncarcinogenic risk Hazard
Index > 1 for Areas 1 and 3
No individual chemical's
intake exceeded its RfD.
Volatilization and
release of volatile
chemicals from subsurface
with subsequent release
to nearby residents and
businesses
Offsite (residents
businesses)
Cancer Risk - Ambient Air
1 X 10-6
Trichloroethane, carbon
tetrachloride, benzene
Air concentrations based on
conservative screening level
modeling. Assumed cap does not
limit releases, constant
release, and contains exposure.
Exposures likely to be lower.
No individaul chemical risk
equal to or greater than
1 x 10-6.
Noncarcinogenic risks
Hazard Index < 1
No individual chemical intakes
exceeded its RfD.
Air concentrations based on
conservative screening level
modeling. Exposures likely
to be lower.
-------
Appendix C
PUBLIC HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
GLT959/020.50-3
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Appendix C
PUBLIC HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
EXPOSURE ESTIMATION
Exposure is defined as the contact of an organism with a chemical or physical
agent. In this assessment, exposure is normalized for time and body weight.
Exposure normalized for time and body weight is termed "intake." Chemical
intake is expressed as mg chemical/kg body weight/day.
GENERIC ESTIMATION OF INTAKE
Equation C-l presents a generic equation for calculating chemical intake
(U.S. EPA 1989).
I = (C x CR x EF x ED) * (BW x AT) (C-l)
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
C = Chemical concentration (e.g, mg/1)
CR = Contact rate (e.g., /day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
BW = Body weight (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
C-l
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Carcinogens
A lifetime average intake (or chronic daily intake) of the chemical is estimated
for carcinogens. This acts to prorate the total cumulative intake over a lifetime.
An averaging time (AT) of 70 years is used for carcinogens.
Intake can change over a lifetime as body weight, contact rate, exposure
frequency, and chemical concentrations change. Equation C-l can be modified
to address this issue:
M
I = (I/AT) Z (Q x CRi x EF x ED) * BW; (C-2)
where:
= Chronic daily intake of the chemical (mg/kg body
weight/day)
= Chemical concentration in ith time period (e.g, mg/1)
= Contact rate in ith time period (e.g., /day)
= Exposure frequency in ith time period (days/year)
M = Number of time periods
ED = Exposure duration in ith time period (years)
BWj = Body weight in ith time period (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
U.S. EPA typically assumes a constant body weight (typically 70 kg) in
estimating lifetime cancer risk. This assumption would alter equation C-3 to
yield the following:
C-2
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
M
l/(ATxBW) E (Q x CRj x EF x ED) (C-3)
Noncarcinogens
The chemical intake of noncarcinogens is estimated over the appropriate
exposure period or averaging time. The averaging time selected depends on the
toxic endpoint being assessed.
When evaluating exposures to developmental toxicants, intakes are calculated by
averaging over the exposure event (e.g., a day or single exposure incident). For
acute toxicants, intakes are calculated by averaging over the shortest exposure
period that could produce an effect, usually an exposure event or a day. For
both situations, it can be assumed that the averaging time and the exposure
period are equal. Therefore, equation C-l can be simplified to:
I = (C x CR) + (BW) (C-4)
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
C = Chemical concentration (e.g, mg/1)
CR = Contact rate (e.g., /day)
BW = Body weight (kg)
When evaluating exposure to noncarcinogenic systemic toxicants, intakes are
calculated by averaging intakes over the period of exposure. The averaging time
used is no longer than a year and may conservatively be estimated to be a day.
In the latter situation, intake can be estimated using equation C-4.
C-3
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
MEDIUM-SPECIFIC INTAKES
The following sections present the methodology for estimating intake from
specific environmental media.
Intake—Drinking Water
An equation for calculating chemical intake through ingestion of drinking water
is presented below:
I = (CW x IR x EF x ED x CF) + (BW x AT) (C-5)
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
CW = Chemical concentration in water (pg/1)
IR = Ingestion rate (/day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
BW = Body weight (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
CF = Conversion factor (10"3 mg/yg)
Intake—Soil Ingestion
An equation for calculating chemical intake through ingestion of soil or sediment
is presented below:
I = (CS x IR x EF x DF x ED x CF) + (BW x AT) (C-6)
C-4
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
CS = Chemical concentration in soil (ng/kg)
IR = Ingestion rate (/day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
DF = Desorption factor (assume 100%)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
BW = Body weight (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
CF = Conversion factor (10'3 mg/yg x 10'3 kg/g)
Intake—Dermal Contact Soil
An equation for calculating chemical intake through dermal absorption of
chemicals from soil is presented below:
I = (CS x SA x DF x AF x EF x ED x CF) - (BW x AT) (C-7)
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
CW = Chemical concentration in soil (yg/kg)
SA = Surface area (cm2)
DF = Desorption factor
AF = Adherence factor—soil to skin (mg/cm2)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
BW = Body weight (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
C-5
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
CF = Conversion factor (10"6 kg/yg)
Intake — Dermal Contact Water
An equation for calculating chemical intake through dermal absorption of
chemicals in water is presented below:
I = (CW x SA x PC x ET x EF x ED x CF) * (BW x AT) (C-8)
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
CW = Chemical concentration in water (pg/1)
SA = Surface area (cm2)
PC = Permeability of water (cm/hr)
ET = Exposure time per day (hour/day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
BW = Body weight (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
CF = Conversion factor (volumetric for water and unit conversion
- lO'3 I/cm3 x 10'3
Intake — Inhalation of Airborne (Vapor Phase) Chemicals
An equation for calculating chemical intake through inhalation of vapor phase
contaminants is presented below:
I = (CA x IR x ET x EF x ED x CF) * (BW x AT) (C-9)
C-6
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
CA = Chemical concentration in air (jig/m3)
IR = Inhalation rate (m3/hour)
ET = Exposure time (hours/day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
BW = Body weight (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
CF = Conversion factor (10~3
Intake — Inhalation of Airborne (Sorbed to Dust) Chemicals
Equation C-10 presents an equation for calculating chemical intake through
inhalation of contaminants sorbed to airborne dusts.
I = (CA x PR x IR x ET x EF x ED x CF) * (BW x AT) (C-10)
where:
I = Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
CA = Chemical concentration in air (ng/m3)
IR = Inhalation rate (m3/hour)
PR = Percent of dust in respirable range
ET = Exposure time (hours/day)
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
ED = Exposure duration (years)
BW = Body weight (kg)
AT = Averaging time (days)
CF = Conversion factor (10~3 mg/yg)
C-7
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
CARCINOGENIC RISK ESTIMATION
For carcinogens, risks are estimated as the incremental probability of an
individual developing cancer over a lifetime as a result of exposure to a
potential carcinogen. The cancer potency factor or slope factor (SF) converts
estimated daily chemical intakes averaged over a lifetime of exposure directly to
incremental risk.
To estimate risks from exposure to carcinogens, the following is needed:
• Chronic daily intake of the chemical
• Carcinogenic potency factor
ESTIMATING CANCER RISKS CAUSED BY
EXPOSURE TO A SINGLE CARCINOGEN
The one-hit equation can be used to describe excess lifetime cancer risk from
exposure to a carcinogen. This model can be described by the following:
Risk = 1 -exp- (C-ll)
where:
Risk = Excess lifetime cancer risk as a unitless probability
exp = the exponential (2.71828)
SF = Slope factor or cancer potency factor (mg/kg/day)"1
GDI = Chronic daily intake averaged over a lifetime (mg/kg/day)
C-8
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Where the risks are low (Risk < 10~3), it can generally be assumed that the
dose-response relationship will be in the linear low-dose portion of the multi-
stage model dose-response curve. Under this assumption, the slope factor is a
constant and risk is related directly to intake. This can be described by:
Risk = SF x GDI (C-12)
ESTIMATING CANCER RISKS CAUSED BY
EXPOSURE TO MULTIPLE CARCINOGENS
Exposure situations may involve the potential exposure to more than one
carcinogen. To assess the potential for carcinogenic effects posed by exposure
to multiple carcinogens, it is assumed in the absence of information on
synergistic or antagonistic effects that carcinogenic risks are additive. This
approach is based on Guidelines for Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures
(U.S. EPA 1986a) and Guidelines for Cancer Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA 1986b).
For estimating cancer risks from exposure to multiple carcinogens from a single
exposure route, the following equation is used:
N
RiskT = z Riskj (C-13)
i = 1
where:
RiskT = Total cancer risk from route of exposure
Risk; = Cancer risk for the ith chemical
C-9
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
NONCARCINOGENIC RISK ESTIMATION
COMPARISON OF INTAKE TO REFERENCE DOSE
The potential for noncancer health effects from exposure to a contaminant is
evaluated by comparing an exposure level over a specified time period with a
reference dose (RfD) for a similar time period. This ratio of exposure to
toxicity is called a hazard quotient and is described below:
HQ = E * RfD (C-14)
where:
HQ = Noncancer hazard quotient
E = Exposure level (or intake in mg/kg/day)
RfD = Reference dose (mg/kg/day)
This comparison can be interpreted as follows:
HQ i 1 Potential for health effects (C-15)
HQ < 1 Health effects not anticipated (C-16)
HAZARD INDEX APPROACH
Exposure situations may involve the potential exposure to more than one
chemical. To assess the potential for noncarcinogenic effects posed by multiple
chemicals, a "hazard index" approach can be used. This approach, which is
based on Guidelines for Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures (U.S. EPA
1986a), assumes dose additivity and sums the ratios of the daily intakes of
C-10
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
individual chemicals to their reference doses. This sum is called the hazard
index (HI).
HI = E1/RfD1 + E2/RfD2+ ... Ei/RfDi (C-17)
where:
HI = Hazard index
Ej = Daily intake of the ith chemical (mg/kg/day)
RfDj = Reference dose of the ith chemical (mg/kg/day)
When the hazard index exceeds unity, it is a numerical indicator of the transition
between acceptable and unacceptable exposure levels and there may be concern
for potential health effects. Any single chemical with an estimated daily intake
greater than the corresponding reference dose will cause the hazard index to
exceed unity.
For multiple chemical exposures, the hazard index can exceed unity even if no
single chemical exposure exceeds the reference dose for that chemical. The
assumption of additivity is most properly applied to chemicals that induce the
same effect by the same mechanism or in the same target organ. If the hazard
index is near or exceeds unity, the chemicals in the mixture are segregated by
critical effect or target organ and separated indexes are derived for each effect
or target organ. If any of these separate indexes exceed unity, then there may
be a concern for potential health effects. Chemicals that are essential nutrients
are excluded from the index when in the range of essentiality.
C-ll
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
VOLATILE EMISSION CALCULATIONS
The model used to estimate volatile emissions is based on a model for
estimating volatile releases from covered landfills (without internal gas
generation) containing toxic materials developed by Farmer and later modified
(U.S. EPA 1988). Diffusion to the atmosphere is assumed to occur from a
planar surface within the landfill using Pick's Law of steady-state diffusion.
Processes such as biodegradation, transport in water, adsorption, and landfill gas
production are ignored by the calculation. The modified equation used to
describe the volatilization is:
Ef = Dj * Csi * A * Ps * M,/^ (C-18)
where:
Ej = emission rate of compound i (g/s)
Dj = diffusion coefficient of compound i (cm2/s)
Csi = saturated vapor concentration of compound i (g/cm3)
A = exposed area (An2)
Ps = the ratio of air-filled soil porosity to total soil porosity
(dimensionless)
Mj = weight fraction of compound i in the waste (g/g)
dx = effective depth of soil cover (cm)
C-12
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
The soil moisture may be accounted for by replacing the total soil porosity with
a porosity ratio term. This ratio is defined as:
Ps = Pa10/3/Pt2 (C-19)
where:
P, = total soil porosity (dimensionless)
Pa = the air-filled soil porosity (dimensionless)
The total soil porosity and the air-filled porosity are computed once the soil
types are defined. In the rare case where the soil is completely dry, the air-
filled porosity becomes the total soil porosity, and Ps becomes P,4/3. This occurs
in the original formulation of equation C-18. The total soil porosity is calculated
as:
Pt = 1.0 - (B/p) (C-20)
where:
B = bulk density of the soil (g/cm3)
p = particle density (g/cm3); 2.65 for mineral material
The air-filled porosity, Pa, can be calculated using the total soil porosity minus
the field capacity for water of the soil. The equation for computing air-filled
porosity is:
Pa = Pt-e
C-13
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
where:
0 = percent field capacity for water of soil (dimensionless)
If the diffusion coefficient for the chemical is unknown, it can be calculated
using Fuller's method given by Perry and Chilton:
D. = (O.Q1 * T1-75 q/Mw. + ^ (C_22)
((I V,)-333) + (I
where:
Dj = diffusion coefficient of compound i (cm2/s)
T = annual average air temperature (°K)
MWj = molecular weight of compound i (g/mol)
MWair = molecular weight of air (328.8) (g/mol)
= atmospheric pressure of site (atm)
= molecular diffusion volume of toxic substance
£Va = molecular diffusion volume of air (20.1) (cm3/
mole)
The molecular weight and volume of a compound are needed to compute the
vapor concentration (Csi) using the following:
C-14
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
VP *
Vri
R * T
CC-23")
saturated vapor concentration of compound i (g/cm3)
where:
= saturated vapor pressure of the compound i (mm Hg)
= molecular weight of compound i (g/mole)
R = molar gas constant (6.23 x 104 cm3 mm Hg/°K mole)
T = annual average air temperature (°K)
Since the saturated vapor concentration of the compound in the soil is used, this
assumes that contaminant concentrations are constant throughout the soil layer.
This assumption provides an upper limit for the volatilization rate.
ONSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS
Equation C-18 was used to estimate emissions from the Phase I landfill. The
surface area of the Phase I landfill is approximately 167,000 m2. Based on test
pit data, average depth to contamination is about 420 cm. Table C-l
summarizes the input to this calculation and estimate of emissions. Contaminant
source concentrations are based on the test pit samples. An upper 95th
percentile confidence limit on the arithmetic mean of test pit samples was used
to describe the source term for volatilization (Table C-l). One-half the
detection limit was used for samples where a chemical was not detected.
Chemicals which were detected in less than 10 percent of the test pit samples
were not included in the emissions estimate.
C-15
-------
Table C-1
TEST PIT DATA
G & H LANDFILL
Chemical
(ug/kg)
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYLBENZENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
Arithmetic
Average
434357
23201
97423
14815
3510
3690
572894
30660
1496292
144892
1931249
Highest No. No.
Detected Samples Nondetects
15000000
180000
1800000
190000
70000
70000
6300000
930000
15000000
3100000
29000000
39
33
39
37
39
39
37
39
31
39
39
26
9
33
23
33
35
6
32
2
24
5
Standard
Deviation
2367775
39031
334306
35774
11206
11288
1320581
147160
3211355
525455
5498815
Upper 95th
Limit
1177486
36518
202345
26342
7027
7232
998414
76847
2626773
309807
3657058
NOTES: One-half the detection limit used for samples where a chemicals concentration was listed as
nondetected in estimating the arithmetic mean concentration.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Although there is no generally accepted methodology for estimating onsite
concentration from an area source, onsite air concentration was estimated based
on the "box model" approach (U.S. EPA 1986c):
C = Q/(LS * V * H) (C-24)
where:
H = mixing height (2 meters)
V = average wind speed with mixing zone
= 0.5 times wind speed at mixing height
LS = width dimension of contaminated area perpendicular to the
wind direction
The mixing width for the box model was assumed to be 230 m, and the mixing
height was assumed to be 2 m. A wind speed of 5.9 m/s was assumed based on
onsite air monitoring data. The estimates of volatilization and onsite
concentration are presented in Table C-2. It was assumed the wind always blew
out of the west.
OFFSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS
The ambient air concentration at a distance of 300 meters downward of Phase I
landfill was estimated by a centerline of a plume directly downwind from the
source using Turner's method (U.S. EPA 1988). It is based on:
(E-25)
C-16
-------
Table C-2
ESTIMATION OF ONSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS FROM VOLATILIZATION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
G&H VOLATILE EMISSION CALCULATIONS
COMPOUND
1 ,2-Dichloroethene *
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene
Parameters Used to Calculated VolitilizarJon:
Ambient Temperature (C)
Absolute Pressure (atmospheres)
Soil Bulk Density (g/cm3)
Particle Density (g/cm3)
Moisture Filled Porosity
Total Porosity
Air Filled Porosity
Ratio of Air Filled to Total Porosity
Surface Area of contaminated zone (m2)
Depth of Soil Cover (cm)
Parameters Used to Calculated Airborne Concentration:
Average Wind Speed (m/s)
Minimum Area Width (m)
Mixing Height (m)
(I) (D (I) (I)
Concen-
(I/C)
tration Molecular Atomic Vapor Diffusion
in soil Weight Diffusion Pressure Coefficient
CAS# (rag/kg) (g/mol) Volume (mm Hg) (cm2/sec.)
540-59-0 1,177.49 97.00 79.96 276.00
78-93-3 36.52 72.00 87.32 77.50
108-10-1 202.34 100.00 128.24 6.00
71-43-2 26.34 78.0 90.68 7.60E+01
56-23-5 7.03 154.00 94.50 90.00
67-66-3 7.23 120.00 76.89 160.00
100-41-4 998.41 106.00 151.80 7.00
127-18-4 76.85 166.00 111.00 14.00
108-88-3 2,626.77 92.0 111.14 2.81E+01
79-01-6 309.81 131.00 93.48 60.00
1330-20-7 3,657.06 106.0 131.60 l.OOE+01
10 (I) Typical subsurface temperatue is 10 degrees C.
1.00 (I) Use 1.0
1.61 (I) Typical range is 1 .0 to 2.0
2.65 (I) 2.65 is representative of average density material
0. 10 (I) Range 0 to 1 .0 but must be less than Total Porosity
0.39 (C) As a check this should be between 0.33 and 0.55
0.29 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
0. 1 1 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
167000 (I) Site specific
418 (I) Site specific
5.90 (I) Site specific (3 m/s can be used as a conservative estimate]
230.00 (I) Site specific
2.00 (I) Use 2 m for on-site calculations
0.08391
0.08409
0.06854
0.08187
0.07493
0.08337
0.06327
0.06961
0.07359
0.07630
0.06735
(C)
Saturated
Vapor
Cone.
(g/crn3)
1.52E-03
3.16E-04
3.40E-05
3.36E-04
7.85E-04
1.09E-03
4.20E-05
1.32E-04
1.46E-04
4.45E-04
6.01E-05
(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
per cm2)
3.87E-07
2.50E-09
1.22E-09
1.87E-09
1.07E-09
1.69E-09
6.85E-09
1.82E-09
7.30E-08
2.72E-08
3.82E-08
(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
from Area
6.46E-02
4.18E-04
2.03E-04
3.12E-04
1.78E-04
2.82E-04
1.14E-03
3.03E-04
1.22E-02
4.53E-03
6.37E-03
(C)
Airborne
Cone.
On-site
(rag/mS)
4.76E-02
3.08E-04
1.50E-04
2.30E-04
1.31E-04
2.08E-04
8.43E-04
2.24E-04
8.99E-03
3.34E-03
4.70E-03
(I) Indicates value must be input by user.
(C) Indicates value is calculated by spreadsheet.
(I/C) Indicates value may be input by user or calculated by the spreadsheet.
* Vapor pressure: average of trans- and cis- at 25C.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
where:
C(X) = concentration of substance at distance x from site (mass/
volume
Q = release rate of substance from site (mass/time)
dy = dispersion coefficient in the lateral (crosswind) direction
(distance)
dz = dispersion coefficient in the vertical direction
y = mean wind speed (distance/time)
•n = the value pi = 3.14
A stability class of D was assumed. The results are presented in Table C-3.
The Turner method is for point sources. For area sources such as the landfill a
virtual point source distance must be estimated using:
S
fly
4.3
where:
S = LS in equation C-24
The distance to the virtual point source is estimated by looking up the estimated
oy on a graph of horizontal dispersion coefficient as a function of downwind
distance from the source (see Figure 3-5, Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual,
U.S. EPA 1988). The distance to the virtual point source and the actual
distance to the receptor location are summed and substituted as a distance from
the virtual source to the receptor.
C-17
-------
Table C-3
ESTIMATION OF OFFSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS-VOLATILIZATION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
O&H VOLATILE EMISSION CALCULATIONS
COMPOUND
1 ,2-Dichloroethene *
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene
Parameters Used to Calculated Volitilization:
Ambient Temperature (C)
Absolute Pressure (atmospheres)
Soil Bulk Density (g/cm3)
Particle Density (g/cm3)
Moisture Filled Porosity
Total Porosity
Air Filled Porosity
Ratio of Air Filled to Total Porosity
Surface Area of contaminated zone (m2)
Depth of Soil Cover (cm)
Parameters Used to Calculated Airborne Concentration:
Average Wind Speed (m/s)
Minimum Area Width (m)
Mixing Height (m)
Stability Class
Receptor Distance Downwind (X) (km)
Distance to virtual point source (Xy)
Virtual Distance to Receptor (X + Xy)
Lateral Dispersion Coefficient (sigma y) (m)
Vertical Dispersion Coefficient (sigma z) (m)
Fraction of Time Wind Blows Toward Receptor
(I) (I) (I) (I) (I/C) (C)
Concen- Saturated
tration Molecular Atomic Vapor Diffusion Vapor
in soil Weight Diffusion Pressure Coefficient Cone.
CASl (rug/kg) (g/raol) Volume (mm Hg) (cra2/sec.) (g/cm3)
540-59-0 1,177.49 97.00 79.96 276.00 0.08391 I.52E-03
78-93-3 36.52 72.00 87.32 77.50 0.08409 3.16E-04
108-10-1 202.34 100.00 128.24 6.00 0.06854 3.40E-05
7143-2 26.34 78.0 90.68 7.60E+01 0.08187 3.36E-04
56-23-5 7.03 154.00 94.50 90.00 0.07493 7.85E-04
67-66-3 7.23 120.00 76.89 160.00 0.08337 1.09E-03
100-41-4 998.41 106.00 151.80 7.00 0.06327 4.20E-05
127-18-4 76.85 166.00 111.00 14.00 0.06961 1.32E-04
108-88-3 2,626.77 92.0 111.14 2.81E+01 0.07359 1.46E-04
79-01-6 309.81 131.00 93.48 60.00 0.07630 4.45E-04
1330-20-7 3,657.06 106.0 131.60 l.OOE+01 0.06735 6.01E-05
10 (I) Typical subsurface temperatue is 10 degrees C.
1.00 (I) Use 1.0
1 .61 (I) Typical range is 1 .0 to 2.0
2.65 (I) 2.65 is representative of average density material
0. 10 (I) Range 0 to 1 .0 but must be less than Total Porosity
0.39 (C) As a check this should be between 0.33 and 0.55
0.29 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
0. 1 1 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
334000 (I) Site specific
418 (I) Site specific
(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
per cm2)
3.87E-07
2.50E-09
1.22E-09
1.87E-09
1.07E-09
1.69E-09
6.85E-09
1.82E-09
7.30E-08
2.72E-08
3.82E-08
(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
from Area
1.29E-01
8.36E-04
4.06E-04
6.24E-04
3.56E-04
5.65E-04
2.29E-03
6.07E-04
2.44E-02
9.07E-03
1.27E-02
(C)
Airborne
Cone.
On-site
(mg/m3)
9.51E-02
6.16E-04
2.99E-04
4.60E-04
2.63E-04
4.16E-04
1.69E-03
4.47E-04
1.80E-02
6.68E-03
9.39E-03
(C)
Airborne
Cone, at
Distance
(mg/ra3)
2.46E-03
1.59EX)5
7.73E-06
1.19E-05
6.78E-06
1.07E-05
4.35E-05
1.15E-05
4.64E-04
1.73E-04
2.42E-04
5.90 (I) Site specific (3 m/s can be used as a conservative estimate)
230.00 (I) Site specific
2.00 (I) Use 2 m for on-site calculations
D Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
0.30 Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
53.50 Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
53.50 Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
81.00 (I) See pp 3-14 and 3-15 of Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual (Versar, 1987)
35.00 (I) See pp 3-14 and 3-15 of Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual (Versar, 1987)
1.00 (I) Site specific (.3 can be used as a conservative upper bound)
(I) Indicates value must be input by user.
(C) Indicates value is calculated by spreadsheet.
(I/C) Indicates value may be input by user or calculated by the spreadsheet.
* Vapor pressure: average of trans- and cis- at 25C.
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
This method assumes a square or rectangular source. The landfill is a triangular
area. This is conservatively compensated for by doubling the landfill area,
essentially created a rectangular area source. This would overestimate the
emissions.
GLT959/009.50
C-18
-------
Appendix D
RISK CALCULATIONS
GLT959/020.50-4
-------
Table 0-1
G & H LANDFILL SITE
ONSITE VISITOR (CHILD) - SURFACE SOIL
NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
Reference Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Chemical mg/kg-day Source a ug/kg mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
_._................._..__...._.._....*............................A.............._..__.__._....._.._._....
Naphthalene 0.4 HEAST 1200 0.0000 0.000 NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) 0.000
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site Visitor
Exposed individual Adult
Soil intake (grams/day) 0.1
Body weight (kilograms) 35
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
-------
Table D-2
G & H LANDFILL SITE
ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT) - SURFACE SOIL
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
Reference Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Chemical mg/kg-day Source a ug/kg mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
Naphthalene 0.4 HEAST 1200 0.0000 0.000 NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) 0.000
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site Visitor
Exposed individual Adult
Soil intake (grams/day) 0.1
Body weight (kilograms) 70
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
-------
Table D-3
G & H LANDFILL SITE - ONSITE VISITOR SURFACE SOIL
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGEST ION
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen Slope Factor
Chemical Classification (kg -day/ ing)
BenzoCa] anthracene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo [g,h,i] per lyene
Chyrsene
I ndeno C 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
PCB
SUM OF RISKS
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Soil ingest ion rate (g/day)
Body weight (kg)
Number of days/years exposed
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average soil intake
(g/kg body weight per day)
82
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
B2
B2
Site Visitor
0.1
70
25
5
70
0.000007
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
7.7
Source
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
HEAST(v)
Lifetime Average Excess
Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime
ug/kg mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
7700
9000
8500
6300
4600
8000
4.800E+03
1.730E+03
5.382E-08
6.290E-08
5.941E-08
4.403E-08
3.215E-08
5.591E-08
3.355E-08
1.209E-08
6E-07
7E-07
7E-07
5E-07
4E-07
6E-07
4E-07
9E-08
4E-06
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-4
SITE VISITOR (CHILD) - OIL SEEP SEDIMENT
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Phenol
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sun of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.6
0.3
2
Site Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST(v)
IRIS
IRIS
ug/kg
125000
15000
23200
10000
15300
1870
189000
mg/kg-day
0.0004
0.0000
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0005
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.018
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.019
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-5
SITE VISITOR (ADULT)- OIL SEEP SEDIMENT
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Phenol
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.6
0.3
2
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST(v)
IRIS
IRIS
ug/kg
125000
15000
23200
10000
15300
1870
189000
mg/kg-day
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.010
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Site Visitor
Adult
0.1
70
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-6
SITE VISITOR - OIL SEEP SEDIMENT
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
U.S.EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
Slope Factor
(kg-day/mg)
Source
Lifetime Average Excess
Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime
ug/kg mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Aroclor 1254
Benzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
N-N i t rosodiphenyIami ne
82
A
82
82
7.7 HEAST(v)
0.029 IRIS
O.OU IRIS
0.0049 IRIS
65600
4600
125000
2.700E+04
4.585E-07
3.215E-08
8.736E-07
1.887E-07
4E-06
9E-10
1E-08
9E-10
SUM OF RISKS
4E-06
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site Visitor
Soil ingest ion rate (g/day) 0.1
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/years exposed 25
Number of years exposed 5
Years in lifetime 70
Lifetime average soil intake 0.000007
(g/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-7
SITE VISITOR (CHILD) - SEDIMENTS ONSITE PONDS AND DITCHES
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGEST ION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Methylphenol
Phenol
Toluene
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
4
0.02
0.5
0.6
0.3
Site Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST(v)
IRIS
ug/kg
3350
537
685
480
16
mg/kg-day
0.000010
0.000002
0.000002
0.000001
0.000000
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000002
0.000077
0.000004
0.000002
0.000000
0.000085
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-8
SITE VISITOR (ADULT) - SEDIMENTS ONSITE PONDS AND DITCHES
NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
4 -Methyl phenol
Phenol
Toluene
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfO)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
4
0.02
0.5
0.6
0.3
Site Visitor
Adult
0.1
70
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
. Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST(v)
IRIS
ug/kg
3350
537
685
480
16
mg/kg-day
0.000005
0.000001
0.000001
0.000001
0.000000
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000001
0.000038
0.000002
0.000001
0.000000
0.000043
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-9
SITE VISITOR - SEDIMENT ONSITE PONDS AND DITCHES
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
U.S.EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
Slope Factor
(kg-day/mg)
Source
Lifetime Average Excess
Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime
ug/kg mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Aroclor 1254
Benzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
B2
A
B2
7.7
0.029
0.014
HEAST(v)
IRIS
IRIS
682
8
537
4.767E-09
5.591E-11
3.753E-09
4E-08
2E-12
5E-11
SUM OF RISKS
4E-08
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site Visitor
Soil ingestion rate (g/day) 0.1
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/years exposed 25
Number of years exposed 5
Years in lifetime 70
Lifetime average soil intake 0.000007
(g/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-10
ONSITE VISITOR (CHILD) - SEDIMENT CLINTON KALAMAZOO CANAL
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Barium
Benzoic acid
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Nickel
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
4
0.005
0.02
0.2
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.02
0.007
0.2
Site Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
c
HEAST
HEAST
ug/kg
39000
180
130
520
99
9600
9600
14100
28
10400
14000
38900
mg/kg-day
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.006
0.001
0.017
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed NCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-11
ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT) - SEDIMENT CLINTON KALAMAZOO CANAL
NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Barium
Benzoic acid
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Nickel
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
4
0.005
0.02
0.2
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.02
0.007
0.2
Site Visitor
Adult
0.1
70
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
c
HEAST
HEAST
ug/kg
39000
180
130
520
99
9600
9600
14100
28
10400
14000
38900
mg/kg-day
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.008
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table 0-12
SITE VISITOR - SEDIMENT CLINTON KALAMAZOO CANAL
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen Slope Factor
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg)
Arsenic A 2
Benzo [a] anthracene B2 11.5
Benzo [blfluoranthene B2 11.5
Benzo [k]f luoranthene B2 11.5
Benzo [a] pyrene 82 11.5
Benzo [g,h,i] per lyene B2 11.5
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate B2 0.014
Chyrsene C 11.5
DOE B2 0.34
Indenot1,2,3-cd]pyrene B2 11.5
SUM OF RISKS
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site Visitor
Soil ingest ion rate (g/day) 0.1
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/years exposed 25
Number of years exposed 5
Years in lifetime 70
Lifetime average soil intake 0.000007
(g/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA
Source
c
b
b
b
b
b
IRIS
b
IRIS
b
1989
Concentration
ug/kg
3900
150
260
260
150
78
520
200
28
7.000E+01
Lifetime Average
Chemical Intake
mg/kg-day
2.726E-08
1.048E-09
1.817E-09
1.817E-09
1.048E-09
5.451E-10
3.634E-09
1.398E-09
1.957E-10
4.892E-10
Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
5E-08
1E-08
2E-08
2E-08
1E-08
6E-09
5E-11
2E-08
7E-11
6E-09
1E-07
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo [a] pyrene. Benzo Ca] pyrene potency
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1
. U.S
from Ambient Water Quality Criteria
. EPA 1988.
Document .
-------
Table D-13
ONSITE VISITOR (CHILD) - SEDIMENTS OFFSITE DITCHES
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGEST ION
Reference
Dose (RfD)
Chemical tng/kg-day
Barium
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Chloroform
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Di butyl phthalate
Manganese
Mercury (alkyl and inorganic)
Nickel
Selenium
Toluene
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
0.05
0.005
0.02
0.2
0.0005
0.01
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.1
0.2
0.0003
0.02
0.003
0.3
0.007
0.2
Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake Hazard
Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
c
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
ug/kg
125000
2200
1229
178
3000
3
4900
4900
8300
34
187
688000
230
36000
3200
87
27000
268000
mg/kg-day
0.0004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0020
0.0000
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001
0.0008
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.007
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.017
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.000
0.011
0.004
0.064
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-14
ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT) - SEDIMENTS OFFSITE DITCHES
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
Reference
Dose (RfD)
Chemical mg/kg-day
Barium
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Chloroform
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Di butyl phthalate
Manganese
Mercury (alkyl and inorganic)
Nickel
Selenium
Toluene
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
0.05
0.005
0.02
0.2
0.0005
0.01
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.1
0.2
0.0003
0.02
0.003
0.3
0.007
0.2
Visitor
Adult
0.1
70
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
c
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
ug/kg
125000
2200
1229
178
3000
3
4900
4900
8300
34
187
688000
230
36000
3200
87
27000
268000
mg/kg-day
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0010
0.0000
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
. 0.0004
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.004
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.000
0.006
0.002
0.032
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-15
ONSITE VISITOR - SEDIMENTS OFF SITE DITCHES
G & H LANDFILL SITE
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGESTION
Chemical
Arsenic
Benzo Ca] anthracene
Benzo Cb] f I uoranthene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perlyene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chloroform
Chyrsene
DDT
Dibenz [a, h] anthracene
Indenod ,2, 3-cd] pyrene
SUM OF RISKS
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Soil ingestion rate (g/day)
Body weight (kg)
Number of days/years exposed
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average soil intake
(g/kg body weight per day)
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
B2
82
C
B2
B2
B2
Site Visitor
0.1
70
25
5
70
0.000007
Lifetime Average
Slope Factor
(kg-day/mg)
2
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
0.014
0.0061
11.5
0.34
11.5
11.5
Concentration Chemical Intake
Source
c
b
b
b
b
b
IRIS
IRIS
b
IRIS
b
b
ug/kg
8700
494
965
965
475
435
1229
3
573
34
1 .860E+02
2.760E+02
mg/kg-day
6.081E-08
3.453E-09
6.744E-09
6.744E-09
3.320E-09
3.040E-09
8.590E-09
2.097E-11
4.005E-09
2.376E-10
1.300E-09
1.929E-09
Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
1E-07
4E-08
8E-08
8E-08
4E-08
3E-08
1E-10
1E-13
5E-08
8E-11
1E-08
2E-08
5E-07
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-16
SITE VISITOR (CHILD) - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Receptor
Water Intake (I/day)
Body Weight (kg)
Reference Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Concentration (DI) Quotient
mg/kg-day Source a ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD
0.02 IRIS
0.2 HEAST
0.3 IRIS
2 IRIS
Site Visitor
Child
0.05
35
1301000 1.8586 92.929
363000 0.5186 2.593
1300 0.0019 0.006
5000 0.0071 0.004
95.531
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
YES
YES
NO
NO
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-17
SITE VISITOR (ADULT) - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION
G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of OI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Receptor
Water Intake (I/day)
Body Weight (kg)
Reference Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Concentration (DI) Quotient
mg/kg-day Source a ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD
0.02 IRIS
0.2 HEAST
0.3 IRIS
2 IRIS
Site Visitor
Adult
0.05
70
1301000 0.9293 46.464
363000 0.2593 1.296
1300 0.0009 0.003
5000 0.0036 0.002
47.766
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
YES
YES
NO
NO
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-18
ONSITE VISITOR - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
G & H LANDFILL SITE
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST I ON
Chemical
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
Slope Factor
(kg-day/mg)
Source
Concentration
ug/l
Lifetime Average
Chemical Intake
mg/kg-day
Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
Aroclor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
82
B2
7.7
0.014
HEAST(v)
IRIS
435000
1301000
1.216E-05
3.637E-05
9E-05
5E-07
SUM OF RISKS
9E-05
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site Visitor
Daily water intake (I/day) 0.05
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 1
Number of years exposed 1
Averaging time: lifetime(yrs) 70
Lifetime average water intake 0.00000003
(I/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Slope Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzoCaJpyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene slope factor from Ambient Water Quality
Criteria Document. U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-19
ONSITE VISITOR (CHILD) - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
G & H LANDFILL SITE
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - DERMAL ABSORPTION FROM WATER
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl ph thai ate
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) =
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Exposed Individual
Body weight (kg)
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake
mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.02 IRIS 0.0008
0.2 HE AST 0.0008
0.3 IRIS 0.0008
2 IRIS 0.0008
Site Visitor
Child
35
18000
75
0.1
1303000 0.0402 2.010 YES
363000 0.0112 0.056 NO
1300 0.0000 0.000 NO
5000 0.0002 0.000 NO
2.067
Based on ingestion RfDs. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
awaiting entry into IRIS.
Verified value
-------
Table D-20
ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT) - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
G & H LANDFILL SITE
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - DERMAL ABSORPTION FROM WATER
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Toluene
Xylenes
Reference
Dose (RfD)
nog/ kg -day
0.02
0.2
0.3
2
Permeabi I i ty
Constant Concentration
Source a
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
cm/hr
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
ug/l
1303000
363000
1300
5000
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0201
0.0056
0.0000
0.0001
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
1.005
0.028
0.000
0.000
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
YES
NO
NO
NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) =
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting Site Visitor
Exposed Individual Adult
Body weight (kg) 70
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.1
1.033
Based on ingestion RfDs. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
awaiting entry into IRIS.
Verified value
-------
Table D-21
ONSITE VISITOR - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
G & H LANDFILL SITE
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - DERMAL ABSORPTION FROM WATER
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Aroclor 1254 B2 7.7 HEAST(v) 8.000E-04 435000 6.567E-07 5E-06
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate B2 0.014 IRIS 8.000E-04 1301000 1.964E-06 3E-08
SUM OF RISKS 5E-06
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Exposed Individual
Body weight (kg) 70
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Number of days per year 1
Number of years exposed 1
Averaging time (yrs in lifetime) 70
a. Cancer potency values based on ingestion. Sources of cancer potency factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene slope factor from Ambient Water Quality Criteria
Document. U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table 0-22
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-01
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal absorption
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Hazard Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Chemical mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD? mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.009 IRIS 0.0008 3 0.0001 0.010 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.009 IRIS 0.0008 0.5 0.0000 0.002 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) 0.011 0.000015
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting Residential
General assumptions:
Receptor Adult
Body Weight (kg) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-23
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-01
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingestion Dermal Absorption
U.S.EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Benzene A 0.029 IRIS 8.000E-04 0.8 2.286E-05 7E-07 3.086E-08 9E-10
1,1-Dichloroethane B2 0.091 HEAST 8.000E-04 3 8.571E-05 8E-06 1.157E-07 1E-08
1,1-Dichloroethene C 0.6 IRIS 8.000E-04 0.5 1.429E-OS 9E-06 1.929E-08 1E-08
Trichloroethene B2 0.011 IRIS 8.000E-04 25 7.143E-04 8E-06 9.643E-07 IE-OS
Vinyl chloride A 2.3 HEAST 8.000E-04 2 5.714E-05 1E-04 7.714E-08 2E-07
SUM OF RISKS 2E-04 2E-07
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingest ion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document. U.S.
EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-24
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-02
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal absorption
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Hazard Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Chemical mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD? mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.009 IRIS 0.0008 2 0.0001 0.006 NO 0.0000 0.000009 NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting Residential
General assumptions:
Receptor Adult
Body Weight (kg) 70
Ingestion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
a. Sources of RfOs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-25
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-02
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingestion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
1,1-Dichloroethane B2 0.091 HEAST 8.000E-04 2 5.7UE-05 5E-06 7.7KE-08 7E-09
Trichloroethene B2 0.011 IRIS 8.000E-04 8 2.286E-04 3E-06 3.086E-07 3E-09
SUM OF RISKS 8E-06 1E-08
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (y 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingest ion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-26
G & H LANDFILL - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-03
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal absorption
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Hazard Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Chemical mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD? mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.009 IRIS 0.0008 1 0.0000 0.003 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
Xylenes 2 IRIS 0.0008 0.9 0.0000 0.000 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) 0.003 0.000004
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting Residential
General assumptions:
Receptor Adult
Body Weight (kg) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table D-27
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-03
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
1,1-Dichloroethane B2 0.091 HEAST 8.000E-04 1 2.857E-05 3E-06 3.857E-08 4E-09
Trichloroethene B2 0.011 IRIS 8.000E-04 1 2.857E-05 3E-07 3.857E-08 4E-10
SUM OF RISKS 3E-06 4E-09
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingestion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document. U.S.
EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-28
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-04
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal absorption
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Hazard Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Chemical • mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD? mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.009 IRIS 0.0008 0.5 0.0000 0.002 NO 0.0000 0.000002 NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting Residential
General assumptions:
Receptor Adult
Body Weight (kg) 70
Ingestion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.
-------
Table 0-29
G & H LANDFILL - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-04
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingestion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
1,1-Dichloroethane B2 0.091 HEAST 8.000E-04 0.5 1.429E-05 1E-06 1.929E-08 2E-09
Vinyl chloride A 2.3 HEAST 8.000E-04 2 5.714E-05 1E-04 7.714E-08 2E-07
SUM OF RISKS 1E-04 2E-07
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingestion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingestion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document. U.S.
EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Table D-30
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-13
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingestion Dermal absorption
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Hazard Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Chemical mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD? mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.09 IRIS 0.0008 1 0.0000 0.000 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) 0.000317 0.000000
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting Residential
General assumptions:
Receptor Adult
Body Weight (kg) 70
Ingestion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
-------
Table D-31
G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-13
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Trichloroethene B2 0.011 IRIS 8.000E-04 0.7 2.000E-05 2E-07 2.700E-08 3E-10
SUM OF RISKS
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingestion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingest ion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table D-32
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 1
NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
Barium
Benzoic acid
2-Butanone
Carbon disulfide
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Dibutyl phthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane
Di ethyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Manganese
4-Methylphenol
Naphthalene
Nickel
Phenol
Silver
Vanadium
Xylenes
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
4
0.05
0.1
1
O.OOS
0.1
0.009
0.8
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.02
0.6
0.003
0.007
Z
0.2
Residential
Adult
70
Source
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
b
HEAST(v)
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
Permeabi I i ty
Constant
a cm/hr
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
Concentration c
ug/l
900.3
218.5
536.7
95.1
5.9
5.9
47.9
98.6
14.2
337.5
342.7
69.9
109.8
29.6
15.7
5.2
23.5
6659.4
857.7
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0257
0.0062
0.0153
0.0027
0.0002
0.0002
0.0014
0.0028
0.0004
0.0096
0.0098
0.0020
0.0031
0.0008
0.0004
0.0001
0.0007
0.1903
0.0245
Ingest ion
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.514
0.002
0.307
0.027
0.000
0.034
0.014
0.313
0.001
0.096
0.049
0.004
0.008
0.042
0.001
0.050
0.096
0.095
0.123
1.774
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003
0.0000
Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does
Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Water Intake (I/day)
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table D-32
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 1
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table 0-33
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 1
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - UATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
Slope Factor
(kg-day/mg)
Source
Permeability
a Constant
cm/hr
Concentration c
ug/l
Ingestion
Lifetime Average Excess
Chemical Intake Lifetime
mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Dermal Absorption
Lifetime Average Excess
Chemical Intake Lifetime
mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Arsenic A 2 b 8.000E-04 57.9 1.654E-03 3E-03 2.233E-06 4E-06
Benzene A 0.029 IRIS 8.000E-04 218.6 6.246E-03 2E-04 8.432E-06 2E-07
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether B2 1.1 IRIS 8.000E-04 16.6 4.743E-04 5E-04 6.403E-07 7E-07
1,1-Dichloroethane B2 0.091 HEAST 8.000E-04 98.6 2.817E-03 3E-04 3.803E-06 3E-07
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine B2 0.0049 IRIS 8.000E-04 14.8 4.229E-04 2E-06 S.709E-07 3E-09
Vinyl chloride A 2.3 HEAST 8.000E-04 220.3 6.294E-03 1E-02 8.497E-06 2E-05
SUM OF RISKS 2E-02 3E-05
SUM OF RISKS U/0 ARSENIC 2E-02 3E-05
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingest ion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table D-34
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 2
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
Barium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Manganese
Naphthalene
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I /day)
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
0.02
0.1
0.03
0.2
0.4
0.02
0.6
0.2
Residential
Adult
70
2
18000
75
0.25
Permeability
Constant Concentration c
Source a cm/hr ug/l
IRIS 0.0008 528.3
IRIS 0.0008 166.1
IRIS 0.0008 21.4
HEAST 0.0008 7.0
HEAST 0.0008 516.7
HEAST 0.0008 6.4
b 0.0008 23.9
HEAST(v) 0.0008 4.9
HEAST 0.0008 197.3
Ingest ion
Daily Intake Hazard
(DI) Quotient Does Intake
mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.0151 0.302 NO
0.0047 0.237 NO
0.0006 0.006 NO
0.0002 0.007 NO
0.0148 0.074 NO
0.0002 0.000 NO
0.0007 0.034 NO
0.0001 0.000 NO
0.0056 0.028 NO
0.689
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
2.04E-05
6.41E-06
8.25E-07
2.70E-07
1.99E-05
2.47E-07
9.22E-07
1.89E-07
7.61E-06
Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does
Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
4.08E-04
3.20E-04
8.25E-06
9.00E-06
9.96E-05
6.17E-07
4.61E-05
3.15E-07
3.81E-05
0.001
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on
the arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table D-35
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 2
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration c Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Arsenic A 2 b 8.000E-04 104.9 2.997E-03 6E-03 4.046E-06 8E-06
Benzene A 0.029 IRIS 8.000E-04 12.5 3.571E-04 1E-05 4.821E-07 1E-08
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate B2 0.014 IRIS 8.000E-04 166.1 4.746E-03 7E-05 6.407E-06 9E-08
SUM OF RISKS 6E-03 8E-06
SUM OF RISKS W/0 ARSENIC 8E-05 1E-07
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions: '
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingestion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table D-36
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 3
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
Acetone
Barium
2-Butanone
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Di butyl phthalate
Ethyl benzene
Manganese
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.2
0.03
0.01
1
0.005
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.02
0.6
0.2
Residential
Adult
70
Source
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
b
HEAST(v)
HEAST
Permeabi I i ty
Constant
a cm/hr
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
Concentration c
ug/l
7.2
1214.3
95.6
43.2
2.7
2.6
5.4
5.4
24.7
6.3
428.7
23.9
147.7
86.1
12.6
95
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0002
0.0347
0.0027
0.0012
0.0001
0.0001
0.0002
0.0002
0.0007
0.0002
0.0122
0.0007
0.0042
0.0025
0.0004
0.0027
Ingest ion
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.002
0.694
0.055
0.006
0.003
0.007
0.000
0.031
0.007
0.002
0.061
0.001
0.008
0.123
0.001
0.014
1.015
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does
Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Water Intake (I/day)
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table D-36
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 3
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table D-37
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 3
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration c Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Arsenic A 2 b 8.000E-04 33.7 9.629E-04 2E-03 1.300E-06 3E-06
Benzene A 0.029 IRIS 8.000E-04 14.9 4.257E-04 1E-05 5.747E-07 2E-08
Chloroform B2 0.0061 IRIS 8.000E-04 2.6 7.429E-05 5E-07 1.003E-07 6E-10
SUM OF RISKS 2E-03 3E-06
SUM OF RISKS U/0 ARSENIC IE-OS 2E-08
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingest ion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table D-38
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 4
NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
Barium
Manganese
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of Dl/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day)
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)
Inges
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Ha
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration c (DI) Quot
mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI
0.05 IRIS 0.0008 472.0 0.0135 0
0.2 HEAST 0.0008 314.0 0.0090 0
0.02 b 0.0008 21.6 0.0006 0
0.6 HEAST(v) 0.0008 4.9 0.0001 0
0.2 HEAST 0.0008 984.6 0.0281 0
0
Residential
Adult
70
2
18000
75
0.25
tion Dermal absorption
zard Daily Intake Hazard
ient Does Intake (DI) Quotient Does Intake
/RfD Exceed RfD? mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
.270 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.045 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.031 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.000 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.141 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.486 0.001
b.
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table D-39
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 4
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingest ion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration c Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Arsenic A 2 b 8.000E-04 23.8 6.800E-04 1E-03 9.180E-07 2E-06
Benzene A 0.029 IRIS 8.000E-04 14.7 4.200E-04 1E-OS 5.670E-07 2E-08
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether B2 1.1 IRIS 8.000E-04 5.9 1.686E-04 2E-04 2.276E-07 3E-07
SUM OF RISKS 2E-03 2E-06
SUM OF RISKS W/0 ARSENIC 2E-04 3E-07
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingestion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingest ion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Surmary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table 0-40
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING UELLS - AREA 5
NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
Acetone
Bar inn
Carbon disulfide
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Manganese
Mercury (alkyl and inorganic)
Nickel
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of Dl/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day)
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.1
0.05
0.1
1
0.005
0.2
0.0003
0.02
0.007
0.2
Residential
Adult
70
2
18000
75
0.25
Permeabi I i ty
Constant Concentration c
Source a cm/hr ug/l
IRIS 0.0008 5.2
IRIS 0.0008 296.9
IRIS 0.0008 2.8
IRIS 0.0008 41.1
IRIS 0.0008 41.1
HE AST 0.0008 509.6
IRIS 0.0008 0.3
b 0.0008 30.6
HEAST 0.0008 26.1
HE AST 0.0008 566.1
Ingest ion
Daily Intake Hazard
(DI) Quotient
mg/kg-day DI/RfD
0.0001 0.001
0.0085 0.170
0.0001 0.001
0.0012 0.001
0.0012 0.235
0.0146 0.073
0.0000 0.029
0.0009 0.044
0.0007 0.107
0.0162 0.081
0.740
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
a. Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Table D-41
G & H LANDFILL SITE
MONITORING WELLS - AREA 5
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Ingestion Dermal Absorption
U.S. EPA Permeability Lifetime Average Excess Lifetime Average Excess
Carcinogen Slope Factor a Constant Concentration c Chemical Intake Lifetime Chemical Intake Lifetime
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg) Source cm/hr ug/l ing/kg-day Cancer Risk mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
Arsenic A 2 b 8.000E-04 8.8 2.514E-04 5E-04 3.394E-07 7E-07
Trichloroethene B2 0.011 IRIS 8.000E-04 8.2 2.343E-04 3E-06 3.163E-07 3E-09
SUM OF RISKS 5E-04 7E-07
SUM OF RISKS W/0 ARSENIC 3E-06 3E-09
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Residential
General assumptions:
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/year exposed 365
Number of years exposed 70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs) 70
Ingest ion assumptions:
Daily water intake (I/day) 2
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2) 18000
Percent submerged (interger) 75
Time in water (hrs/day) 0.25
Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):
Ingest ion 0.029
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S.EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
arithmetic average chemical concentration.
-------
Appendix Table D-42
LISTING OF MONITORING WELLS AND SAMPLES BY AREAS
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3
PHASE I LANDFILL PHASE O LANDFILL PHASE ffl LANDFILL
SAMPLE NOS. SAMPLE NOS. SAMPLE NOS.
GH-FROWOH33A-02 OH-OWOH32A-02 OH-OWOH30A-02
OH-FRGWOH42B-02 OH-OWOH45A-02 OH-OWGH30B-02
GH-FRGWRD24-02 GH-GWI05-02 GH-GWGH31A-02
GH-FRGWRW30-02 GH-GWRL17-02 GH-GWGH31B-02
GH-GWGH11B-02 GH04B-01 GH-GWGH31C-02
GH-GWGH12A-02 GH04C-01 OH-GWRL29-02
GH-GWGH12B-O2 GH05A-01 GH23A-01
GH-GWGH24A-02 GH06A-01
GH-GWGH26A-02 GH06B-01
GH-GWGH33B-02 GH07A-01
GH-GWGH35A-02 105-01
GH-GWGH35B-02 RL17-01
GH-GWGH37A-02
GH-GWGH38A-02
GH-GWGH39A-02
GH-GWGH40A-02
GH-GWGH40B-O2
GH-GWGH41B-02
GH-GWGH03B-02
GH-GWRD08XX-02
GH-GWRD18-02
GH-GWRL04-02
GH-GWRL06-02
GH-GWRW10-02
GH-GWRW14-02
GH-GWRW21-02
GH-GWRW22-02
GH-GWRW23-02
GH-GWRW24-02
GH11B-01
GH12A-01
GH12B-01
GH20A-01
GH20B-01
GH21A-01
GH22A-01
GH22B-01
GH26A-01
GH33A-02
103-01
RD02X-01
RD08XX-01
RD 18-01
RL04-01
RL06-01
RW07-01
RW12X-01
RW14-01
RW19-01
AREA4
CANAL A WETLAND AREA
SAMPLE NOS.
GH-GWOH01A-02
GH-GWGH01B-02
OH-GWGH02A-02
OH-OWGH02B-02
OH-OWOH03C-02
OH-OWGH08B-O2
GH-OWGH09A-02
GH-OWGH09B-02
GH-GWGH34A-02
OH-GWOH34B-02
OH-GWOH43A-02
GH-GWGH43B-02
GH-GWGH44A-02
GH01A-01
GH01B-01
GH01C-01
GH02A-01
GH02B-01
GH02C-01
GH03A-01
GH10A-01
GH10B-01
GH10C-01
GH25A-01
AREAS
AUTOMOBILE DISPOSAL YARD
AND COMMERCIAL AREA
SAMPLE NOS.
GH-FRGWGH17B-02
GH-GWGH17A-02
GH-GWGH19A-02
GH-GWGH19B-02
GH-GWGH27A-02
GH-GWGH28A-02
GH-GWGH28B-02
GH-GWGH29A-02
GH-GWGH29B-O2
GH-GWGH29C-02
GH-GWGH36A-02
GH-GWGH36B-02
GH17A-01
GH17B-01
GH17C-01
GH19A-01
-------
Page 1 of 13
Sample Number
FRRW07-99
GH11B-01
GH12A-01
GH12B-01
GH13B-01
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Chemical
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Detected
Concentration
("9/1)
50.7 J
4J
13400
166
3.7 J
1640
53.2
6 J
43
10
14400
237
64
5.4 J
2J
1390
113
14
24.7
6010
169
2J
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Flnal
SMCL-Final
1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
1 x 10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1x10-6
1 X10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 X10-6
1x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1x10-6
Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2
-------
Page 2 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
FRGH13B-99
GH20A-01
QH20B-01
GH21A-01
GH21A-01DL
GH22A-01
GH26A-01
Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
XYLENE (TOTAL)
BENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
25.1
6630
170
7J
197
22.4
118
110
13800
51.9
26.1 J
800 E
140 D
940 D
8.1 J
357
108
1 J
93.6
56
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1 x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10«
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2
50
0.0025
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
15.4
20
400
0
0.67
5
20
400
0.0025
300
50
0
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
-------
Page 3 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
GH26A-01
(continued)
GH-FRGWGH33A-02
GH-FRGWGH40A-02
GH-FRGWGH42B-02
GH-FRGWRD24-02
GH-FRGWRW05-02A*
GH-GWGH11B-02
Chemical
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
AROCLOR-1254
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ARSENIC
IRON
Detected
Concentration
("9/1)
3J
11000
198
39.6
17 J
2 J
10000 J
63.7 J
31.9
15
13
1470
132
25.5
2090
51.4
12
1 J
34
130
43 J
53
2.4 J
2830 J
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Flnal
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1 x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1 x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x10-6
MCL-Final
1x1f>6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1 x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1 x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
Criteria Level
("9/1)
0.03
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
30
20
0
0.5
0.013
20
0.0025
300
-------
Page 4 of 13
Sample Number
GH-GWGH12A-02
GH-GWGH12A-02
GH-GWGH12B-02
GH-GWGH24A-02
GH-GWGH26A-02
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Chemical
AROCLOR-1254
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
1.8
28.8
15 J
10700
218
55
3 J
116
42
46.5
560
69
530
17600
102
9J
3500
170
210 J
11
13900
340
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1 X10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
MCLS-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
OC
1x1(^6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
Criteria Level
("9/1)
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
50
0.1
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
300
50
4.9
20
400
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
-------
Page 5 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
GH-GWGH33A-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
38
17 J
11300J
64.3 J
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x1f>6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
Criteria Level
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
GH-GWGH33B-02
GH-GWGH33B-02
GH-GWGH35A-02
GH-GWGH35B-02
GH-GWGH37A-02
GH-GWGH38A-02
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
4-METHYLPHENOL
AROCLOR-1254
ARSENIC
BARIUM
307
11
12800 J
71.7
26
14000
123
5J
6240
24.4
1040
4 J
1050
467
330 J
9.5 D
35.7
1070
1 X10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
OC
MCLG- Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
300
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
300
50
0.1
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
1000
-------
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
Page 6 of 13
Sample Number
GH-GWGH38A-02
(continued)
GH-GWGH38A-02 DL
GH-GWGH39A-02
GH-GWGH40A-02
GH-GWGH40B-02
GH-GWGH41B-02
Chemical
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
4-METHYLPHENOL
AROCLOR-1254
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BARIUM
IRON
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
1300
2900
8800
198
260 D
12 DJ
61
4800 J
332J
29.4
23
9J
1790
157
24.7
1400
2650
110
42 J
10200 J
Criteria (a) Criteria Level
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
TP
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-RnaJ
OC
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
(ug/i)
0
0.67
5
30
700
700
2400
300
50
0.1
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
- 50
50
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
1000
300
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
-------
Page 7 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
GH-GWGH42B-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
24.8
2070
51.7
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0.0025
300
50
GH-GWRD08XX-02
GH-GWRD18-02
GH-GWRD24-02
GH-GWRL04-02
GH-GWRL06-02
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
4-METHYLPHENOL
ALUMINUM
AROCLOR-1254
ARSENIC
BARIUM
71.4
2J
5670
91.7
111
6530
54.2
11.5
33
110
66J
1330 J
150
2J
39400 J
604 J
180 J
169 J
0.93 J
32.7
2240 J
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG- Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Final
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
OC
SMCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
0.0025
50
50
300
50
0.0025
30
20
50
1000
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.1
50
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
1000
1500
5000
5000
-------
Page 8 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
GH-GWRL06-02
(continued)
GH-GWRW05-02*
GH-GWRW10-02
GH-GWRW11-02A*
Chemical
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
XYLENE (TOTAL)
AROCLOR-1254
XYLENE (TOTAL)
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
VINYL CHLORIDE
AROCLOR-1254
TOLUENE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
130
170
53300 J
797 J
109
1300
43 J
70
800
3J
5990
230 J
590
131000
1710
56.9
20 J
1200
189 J
4980 J
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Pro posed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
OC
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG- Proposed
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1 x 10-6
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
MCLG- Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x1CW
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
DW
Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0
0.67
5
30
300
50
15.4
20
400
0
0.5
0.013
20
0.1
0.0025
1000
1500
5000
5000
0
0.67
5
30
300
50
15.4
4.9
0
2
2
0
0.5
0.013
40
2000
2000
2420
-------
Page 9 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
GH-GWRW11-02A*
(continued)
GH-GWRW11-02A«
GH-GWRW14-02
GH-GWRW14-02
GH-GWRW14-02DL
GH-GWRW21-02
Chemical
XYLENE (TOTAL)
*
AROCLOR-1254
ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ARSENIC
Detected
Concentration
(ug/1)
92340 J
21 J
406
1190
115J
51.8
520 J
12 J
680 J
25200
110
8J
890 J
1500 D
2100 D
5000 D
51.7
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
DW
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
DW
Criteria Level
("9/1)
20
400
10000
10000
0
0.5
0.013
30
20
400
50
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
300
50
4.9
20
400
0
0.67
5
30
700
700
20
400
0.0025
50
50
-------
Page 10 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
GH-GWRW21-02
(continued)
GH-GWRW22-02
GH-GWRW23-02
GH-GWRW24-02
GH-GWRW24-02
Chemical
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
AROCLOR-1254
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
2J
7300
119
34.5 J
14
76
83
7J
74
11800
169
23.3
7600
318
68.5 J
1.5
9.3 J
2290 J
160
230
45800 J
477 J
1400
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Flnal
SMCL-Final
TP
OC
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCLG-Finai
1 X10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
DW
Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0
0.67
300
50
15.4
0.1
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
300
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
1000
1500
5000
5000
0
0.67
5
30
300
50
20
400
-------
Page 11 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
103-01
RD02X-01
RD08XX-01
RD18-01
RL04-01
RL06-01
Chemical
ARSENIC
BENZENE
LEAD
ARSENIC
IRON
LEAD
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
BARIUM
BENZENE
IRON
XYLENE (TOTAL)
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
12.9
10
6
10
569
29.9
74.6
5
7350
117
130
2J
6310
54.2
1370
180
46200
36
140
27
1360
120
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
OC
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
Criteria Level
("9/0
0.0025
0
0.67
5
5
0.0025
300
5
20
20
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
1000
0
0.67
5
300
20
0.1
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
5
-------
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
Page 12 of 13
Sample Number
RL06-01
RL06-01DL
RW07-01
RW12X-01
RW14-01
Chemical
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
TOLUENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
Detected
Concentration
(ug/0
920 J
47600
509
48.2
370 J
18
4700 J
140 DJ
10000
6800 D
65.4
4 J
13600
162
49.6
4 J
22000
276
1 J
52
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
SMCL-Proposed
MCLS- Final
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
MCLS-Rnal
1 x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
Criteria Level
("9/1)
30
700
700
300
50
15.4
40
0
2
2
20
400
0
0.67
5
30
700
700
20
400
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
0
0.0025
50
50
-------
Page 13 of 13
Table D-43
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 1 - PHAS
Sample Number
RW14-01
(continued)
RW19-01
Chemical
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
1500
8J
2000
25200
101
16.6 J
14
8700
8.5 J
3J
68300
2060
18.8 J
1 J
3J
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
TP
MCLG-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1x10-6
Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
700
700
300
50
15.4
4.9
20
400
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
15.4
0
0
2
2
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
1X10-6- Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1x10-6
TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)
-------
Table D-44
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
Page 1 of 2
AREA 2 - PHASE II LANDFILL
Sample Number
GH04B-01
GH05A-01
GH06A-01
'•• .
GH06B-01
GHQ7A-01
i ;•;-.* S
GH-GWGH32A-02
GB-GWGH45A-O2
GH-GWI05-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
NICKEL
ARSENIC
IRON
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
38.4
1030
9650
884
21.3 J
45.4
1 J
12200
636
21 .6 J
316
6
13500
35.8 J
20.1
4640
6 J
52.5
11
18400
298
693
8.2 J
7590
486
69.7
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x106
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x 10-6
MCL-Final
Criteria Level
("9/1)
0.0025
300
300
50
15.4
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
15.4
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
15.4
0.0025
300
0
2
2
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
50
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table D-44
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 2 - PHASE II LANDFILL
Sample Number Chemical
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
GH-GWRL17-02 ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
105-01 ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
RL17-01 ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
21
18300
438
41.1
24 J
13700
376
78.8
18
28500
458
30
30
2J
16200
358
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1 x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
Criteria Level
("9/0
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
20
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
1 X 10-6 - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1x10-6
TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)
-------
Page 1 of 2
Table D-45
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 3 - PHASE III LANDFILL
Sample Number
GH23A-01
GH-FRGWGH30A-02
GH-FRGWGH31A-02
GH-GWGH30A-O2
GH-GWGH30B-02
GH-GWGH31A-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
LEAD
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
10.4
5.8
269 J
54.8
1030
7160
292 J
55.2 J
27.1
5
15800
232
654J
44.5
9320
12.8 J
723 J
39.6
1470
16
10200
102
69.3 J
28.6
6 J
15900
209
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x1(W
MCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
MCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
1 xlO-6
MCL-Final
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
Criteria Level
("9/1)
0.0025
5
50
0.0025
50
50
1000
300
50
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
300
5
50
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table D-45
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 3 - PHASE III LANDFILL
Sample Number
GH-GWGH31B-02
GH-GWGH31C-02
GH-GWRL29-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
CHLOROFORM
IRON
2-BUTANONE
4-METHYLPHENOL
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
24.2
1360
26
9750
160
544
5.6 J
2J
663
200 J
360 J
65.4 J
9.8 J
6
62500
268
96.3
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCL-Final
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1 X10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
DW
OC
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
TP
Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
0.19
100 g
300
170
0.1
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
15.4
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
1 X 10-6 - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1x10-6
TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)
-------
Page 1 of 4
Table D-46
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMAZOO CANAL
Sample Number
GH01A-01
GH01B-01
GH01C-01
GH02A-01
GH02B-01
Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
. BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
NICKEL
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
46.6
10300
118
14.8
4J
993
1440
368
56
45.4
60
9J
12500
112
5J
19.5
5
4580
15.8 J
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1 x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
TP
Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
300
1000
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
4.9
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
15.4
GH02C-01
GH03A-01
ARSENIC
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
6.1 J
1.8 J
570
649
18.8 J
1 x 10-6
1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
TP
0.0025
0.0025
300
50
15.4
GH08C-01
ARSENIC
IRON
8.7 J
597
SMCL-Rnal
0.0025
300
-------
Page 2 of 4
GH10B-01
GH25A-01
GH-GWGH01A-02
GH-GWGH01&O2
GH-GWGH02A-02
GH-GWGH02B-02
Table D-46
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMAZOO CANAL
Sample Number
GH10A-01
Chemical
ARSENIC
BARIUM
IRON
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
2.7 J
1140
1730
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
Criteria Level
(MO/I)
0.0025
1000
300
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
LEAD
4-METHYLPHENOL
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
ARSENIC
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
GH-GWGH03B-02RE VINYL CHLORIDE
82.5
SMCL-Final
50
39.4
4730
110
33.2
2J
3J
7730
166
15.9
15 J
3J
52.6 J
14
28
11
3470
22.9
3 J
1590
88.7
250
1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
1x1^6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1 x10-6
MCL-Proposed
OC
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1 x 10-6
1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Rnal
1 X10-6
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
0.03
300
50
0.0025
5
0.1
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
0.0025
0.03
300
50
0
2
2
-------
Page 3 of 4
Table D-46
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMA2OO CANAL
Sample Number
GH-GWGH03C-02
GH-GWGH08B-02
GH-GWGH09A-02
GH-GWGH09B-02
GH-GWGH34A-O2
GH-GWGH34B-02
GH-GWGH43A-02
GH-GWGH43B-Q2
Chemical
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
MANGANESE
NICKEL
ARSENIC
BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
953
12.9
904
2.9 J
188
32.4
2J
4J
546
25
629
426
20.3
1480
1150
12.5
1050
79.4
3J
473
32.3 J
16.8
3J
2900
102
26
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
Criteria Level
(ug/i)
50
0.0025
300
0.0025
50
0.0025
0
0.67
0.03
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0.03
50
15.4
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
0
2
2
-------
Page 4 of 4
Table D-46
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMAZOO CANAL
Sample Number
GH-GWGH44A-02
GH-GWGHO3B-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
35.6
56
7J
7140
135
14.6
3930
72.8
330 J
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
MCLS-Hnal
MCL-Final
1 X10-6
Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
1 X 10-6 - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1 x 10-6
TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)
-------
Page 1 of 2
Sample Number
GH17A-01
GH17&O1
GH17C-01
GH19A-01
GH-FRGWGH17B-02
GH-GWGH17A-02
GH-GWGH17B-02
GH-GWGH19A-02
GH-GWGH19B-02
GH-GWGH27A-02
Table D-47
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 5 - AUTOMOBILE DISPOSAL YARD
Chemical
IRON
MANGANESE
TRICHLOROETHENE
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
LEAD
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
345
60.8
14
8.4 J
178
623
4.2 J
185
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1xir>6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCL-Pro posed
MCLG- Proposed
DW
MCL-Final
TP
Criteria Level
(ug/l)
300
50
0
2.8
5
0.0025
50
50
0.0025
5
20
20
50
50
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
TRICHLOROETHENE
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
CHROMIUM
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
TRICHLOROETHENE
157
SMCL-Rnal
50
11.1
176
14 J
11.7
169
170
172 J
341
1020
185
73.2 J
444
7 J
1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Final
1 xlO-6
SMCL-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
DW
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
0.0025
50
0
2.8
5
0.0025
50
50
100
100
120
50
50
300
50
50
50
0
2.8
5
-------
Page 2 of 2
Table D-47
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
G&H LANDFILL SITE
AREA 5 - AUTOMOBILE DISPOSAL YARD
Sample Number
GH-GWGH28B-02
GH-GWGH29A-02
GH-GWGH29B-02
GH-GWGH29C-02
GH-GWGH36A-02
GH-GWGH36B-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
NICKEL
TRICHLOROETHENE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
2.3 J
100
9.6 J
540
675
159 J
2.7 J
1310
358
2930
15.2
6930
1250
6010
15.7
23800
34
1200
50.1
22
308
6.7 J
2840
143
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x106
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1xir>6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x106
SMCL-Final
MCL-Proposed
MCLG- Pro posed
DW
SMCL-Final
TP
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0.0025
300
5
20
20
50
15.4
0
2.8
5
50
0.0025
300
50
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
1 X 10-6 - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1 x 10-6
TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)
-------
Table D-48
G & H LANDFILL SITE
SITE VISITOR - EXPOSURE TO VOLATILES - PHASE I LANDFILL
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - INHALATION
Chemical
1 ,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
Reference
Dose(RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.0007
0.01
O.I
0.01
0.09
0.02
1
0.4
Source a
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST
Onsite(*)
Concentration
mg/m3
4.76E-02
1.31E-04
2.08E-04
8.43E-04
2.24E-04
3.08E-04
1.50E-04
8.99E-03
4.70E-03
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.380800
0.029943
0.003328
0.001349
0.003584
0.000548
0.001200
0.001438
0.001880
0.424
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Receptor
Body weight (kg)
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Volume of air inhaled/day (m3/day)
Volume of air inhaled per day per
kilogram of body weight (m3/kg-day)
Site Visitor
Adult
70
1.4
8
11
0.16
a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989
b. No inhalation RfD available, based on ingestion RfD
(*) Concentrations are modeled. See Appendix E.
-------
Table D-49
G & H LANDFILL
SITE VISITOR - EXPOSURE TO VOLATILES - PHASE I LANDFILL
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - INHALATION
Chemical
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
SUM OF RISKS
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
Onsite (*) Lifetime Average
Slope Factor a Concentration Chemical Intake
(kg-day/mg) Source mg/m3 mg/kg-day
0.029 IRIS 2.30E-04 0.00
0.13 IRIS 1.31E-04 0.00
0.081 IRIS 2.08E-04 0.00
0.0033 HEAST 2.24E-04 0.00
0.013 IRIS 3.34E-03 0.00
Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
5E-09
IE-OS
IE-OS
6E-10
3E-08
7E-08
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Body weight (kilograms)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Number of days per week
Number of weeks per year
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average air intake
(m3/kg body wt.- day)
Site Visitor
1.4
70
8
1
25
5
70
0.0008
a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
(*) Concentrations are modeled. See Appendix E.
-------
Table D-50
G & H LANDFILL SITE
OFFSITE EXPOSURE TO VOLATILES RELEASED FROM LANDFILL
NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - INHALATION
Chemical
1 ,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.0007
0.01
0.1
0.01
0.09
0.02
1
0.4
Source a
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST
Offsite(*)
Concentration
rng/m3
2.46E-03
6.78E-06
1.07E-05
4.35E-05
1.15E-05
1.59E-05
7.73E-06
4.64E-04
2.42E-04
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.035002
0.002756
0.000304
0.000124
0.000327
0.000050
0.000110
0.000132
0.000172
0.039
Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Receptor
Body weight (kg)
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Volume of air inhaled/day (m3/day)
Volume of air inhaled per day per
kilogram of body weight (m3/kg-day)
Residential
Adult
70
0.83
24
20
0.2845714286
a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989
b. No inhalation RfD available, based on ingestion RfD.
(*) Concentrations are modeled. See Appendix D.
-------
Table D-51
G & H LANDFILL SITE
OFFSITE EXPOSURES TO VOLATILES RELEASED FROM PHASE I LANDFILL
EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - INHALATION
Chemical
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
SUM OF RISKS
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
Offsite(*) Lifetime Average
Slope Factor a Concentration Chemical Intake
(kg-day/mg) Source mg/m3 rag/kg-day
0.029 IRIS 1.19E-05 0.00
0.13 IRIS 6.78E-06 0.00
0.081 IRIS 1.07E-05 0.00
0.0033 HEAST 1.15E-05 0.00
0.013 IRIS 1.73E-04 0.00
Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
1E-07
3E-07
2E-07
IE-OS
6E-07
1E-06
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Body weight (kilograms)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Number of days per week
Number of weeks per year
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average air intake
(m3/kg body wt.- day)
Residential
0.83
70
24
7
52
70
70
0.2846
a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. No inhalation potency. Cancer potency based on ingestion potency.
(*) Concentrations are modeled. See Appendix D.
-------
Appendix E
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
GLT959/020.50-5
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Appendix E
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
INTRODUCTION
This appendix presents the observations and a qualitative evaluation of potential
environmental concerns associated with the G&H Landfill site. The goal of that
effort was to qualitatively determine if site-related contaminants are present in
biota that could frequent the site or that may come in contact with contaminants
that have or are migrating from the site. The sampling effort was related to
sampling biota that could be exposed to site related contaminants and was
qualitative to the extent that the analysis presents limited information. The
methodology was useful for determining only the presence or absence of
chemicals of concern in the animals, without confirming that the chemicals came
from the site.
PREVIOUS STUDIES
Limited environmental studies were conducted at the G&H Landfill site. From
August through November 1983, fish and invertebrates were sampled in the
Clinton River. Mammals were sampled south of the site, along the Clinton
River and in the area of the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal. More fish were sampled
in September 1984.
In addition, a report on the impact the operations of Liquid Disposal, Inc., have
had on the Clinton River was prepared in May 1986 by the Michigan DNR.
The report, which discussed fish sampling efforts and the results of tissue
analyses, is pertinent to the G&H site since the river is adjacent to the site and
fish sampling locations are upstream and downstream of the G&H Landfill site.
E-l
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Details of these sampling efforts can be found in Appendix H of the G&H
Landfill Interim RI Technical Report.
SITE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The site is mainly an area of old field herbaceous and;shrubby vegetation.
Limited areas of upland woods are present near the perimeter of the landfill.
There is a large perennial pond just below the terrace that drops 15 to 20 feet
in elevation just south of the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal. It has been a
prominent feature in the Utica-Rochester Recreation Area since at least 1955.
East of the pond are two areas of wetlands that receive surface runoff from
culverts that extend beneath the canal. Southwest of the Phase III Landfill
there are some old oxbows of the Clinton River that are; perennial open water
bodies with wetland areas extending north along the toe of the Phase III
Landfill. The wetland vegetation present south and west of the site is generally
associated with the Clinton River and its flood plain. The wetlands are classified
by the National Wetlands Inventory as predominantly palustrine forested and
scrub/shrub types located on saturated to semipermanently flooded soils.
The property south of the site in the Utica-Rochester Recreation Area has been
used for recreational or residential purposes. This is evident from presence of
old building foundations, wrought iron fences, and pilings for w. hat may have
been walkways across the pond. There are also remnants of old wells both on
the terrace and along the Clinton River.
The G&H Landfill is within the Clinton River watershed j^.The., Clinton River is
located s
St. Clair.
located south and west of the landfill, and it eventually drains .into Lake
E-2
-------
-.-.'A \'::•/.;7o,> AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
Potential contaminant exposure sources for terrestrial and aquatic fauna include
subsurface soils, groundwater discharge, and oil seeps. Terrestrial wildlife could
be exposed to contaminants through direct contact near the Oil Seep Area at
the southeastern corner of the site, where contaminated groundwater discharges
to surface ponds and wetlands. Exposure could occur through direct contact or
ingestion. Similar exposure could take place west of the Phase III Landfill in
the wetland area near the leachate seeps.
Contaminants could enter the pond or Clinton River and adjacent wetlands in
surface water runoff from the seep areas. Fish, frogs, turtles, and various
aquatic invertebrates, and terrestrial animals such as birds, muskrats, raccoons,
and opossums could-thus be exposed.
' J±, U: ',-
-. • •'! V- •'•
- SAMPLING EFFORTS
, .1
Mammals, fish, and crayfish samples were taken near the G&H Landfill site
during the 1983 and 1984 sampling efforts. Thirty-eight fish and 18 crayfish
were taken from the Clinton River, and 9 mammal samples were obtained from
areas adjoining the site. The following compounds were found in the tissues
from these animalsi " '':--ni:!
• . I '-• !<•• ^ner'
• arsenic • phenanthrene
• cadmium • 4,4'DDE
. .«•-) j.. ,.
• chrOmiurii' • 4,4'DDD
lead;:rt; ni: ;; • 4,4'DDT
• mercury • Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
PCBs (1254, 1260) • endrin
• 2,4-diethyl phthalate • dieldrin
E-3
-------
AGENCY-REVIEW DRAFT
• bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate • -heptacnlbr expoxide
• pyrene .
'•c ?
The results of the aquatic sampling are presented in Table E-l; the mammal
sampling results are presented in Table E-2. _
Soil, surface water, and groundwater at the site were tested for various
parameters, including those listed previously. The results^ of those sampling
efforts are discussed in Chapter 3. •;—-•;
Chromium was present in all fish and macroinvertebrate samples. Lead was
found in 71 percent and mercury in 88 percent of the samples. Arsenic was
found in three fish and cadmium in six. '•-'-•
Chromium and lead were present in all crayfish sampled_and in most of the
mammals tested. Mercury was found in three crayfish. Cadmium was found in
two crayfish and four mammals. Arsenic was detected in only one crayfish.
Arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury had been _ detected in some
groundwater and subsurface soil samples.
Dieldrin was present in most of the fish samples but was not detected in any
media sampled at the site. Endrin and heptachlor epoxide .were found once
each in two different mammals. These chemicals were also detected in site soils.
Pyrene and phenanthrene, which were present in some of the subsurface soils,
were detected in two and three fish, respectively. 2,4-Diethyl phthalate was
detected in groundwater and subsurface soil samples and* in four fish samples.
:!^H •••
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected in the soil and in three of the fish and
three mammals. Gamma-BHC (Lindane) was found in groundwater samples
and in most of the fish samples. ;' if ,;
E-4
-------
Table E-1
CONCENTRATION OF COMPOUNDS IN CLINTON RIVER AQUATIC ORGANISMS
WHOLE TISSUE SAMPLES
(ug/kg)
COMPOUNDS
Total
Sample - Weight Length Sample Percent
Number Species '.:'.' (grams) (cm) .- Type Upkts
FISH '£ o _. ::.': L-- £,
F1001 Northern Pike —• in 1500 r~62,"' ~" Fillet JJ'1.3
F1002 Northern Pike 3 JJ 1000 r'*> ,,< ^Fillet C3"l.1
F1003 Carp ; £-2100 -)54E^ ^-~™* ";2-4
F1004 Carp $ 2220 ,^,66 U| tJ-'Flllet £r6.6
F1005 Carp -, -"600 :33.6 O " Fillet f.3.1
F1006 White Sucker ~" »" 390 "31 -|- -> Fillet ^1.1
F1007 White Sucker 300 30.6 • Fillet 0.9
F1008 White Sucker 220 28 Fillet 0.1
F1009 White Sucker 290 28 Fillet 0.6
F1010-013 4 Common Shiners 59 Whole Fish 13.8
F1014 Walleye 1200 47 Fillet 1.4
F1015 Walleye 460 38 Fillet 0.7
F1016 Walleye 150 26 Fillet 1
F1017 Walleye 120 24 Fillet 1
F1018 Northern Pike 1300 58 Fillet 2.2
F1019-021 3 Common Shiners 96 Whole Fish 1.7
F1031 White Sucker 200 25.5 Fillet 0.6
F1032 White Sucker 165 25.5 Fillet 0.8
F1033 White Sucker 250 28.6 Fillet 0.7
F1034 White Sucker 250 29 Fillet 0.9
F1035 Carp 1500 48 Fillet 0.73
F1036 Carp 3000 61 Fillet 8.6
F1037 Carp 3400 60.5 Fillet 45.8
F1038 Carp 2500 59 Fillet 1.6
CRAYFISH
M1001 7 Crayfish Whole Animals 0.12
M1002 4 Crayfish Whole Animals 0.45
M1003 1 Crayfish Whole Animals 1.2
M1004 6 Crayfish Whole Animals O.S
M1005 1 Crayfish Whole Animals 0.6
2,4-Oiethyl
Phtnalate
367
170
; 278
92
Bis 2 ethyl
Hexyl
Phthalate
661
223
1730
Phenan-
threne
59
,' --
" 139
'j- "I
Pyrene
O
ET
£J-
284
236
Dteldrin
4
CT 3
C> 9
29
•-. 22
1
2
6
6
3
2
6
14
12
39
4.4'DOE
160
80
180
620
170
140
79
120
69
240
93
26
39
32
181
140
45
35
72
67
600
1017
3200
1073
46
103
29
52
96
4,4'DDO
110
. 30
"/)' 88.
..
', 76;
;. 45
22
45
27
78
38
6
11
11
52
24
12
9
33
23
603
606
2010
420
8
6
14
Qamma-
BHC
(Undone)
4
6
21
24
14
3
1
4
2
17
6
2
2
2
3
6
1
2
3
29
177
PCB-1264
620
300
1200
3700
•-JMO
(\960
"480
990
420
1200
430
198
280
606
1080
1006
662
147
118
109
1762
2330
227000
936
660
660
289
280
495
PCB-1260
670
390
2300
3300
.;, 270
610
200
420
120
770
280
128
180
269
466
617
296
248
660
460
3290
4630
2600
4660
66
91
158
124
285
Arsenic
.-.
^
:;
'-•
160
490
360
Cadmium
36
18
36
30
176
44
42
198
Chromium
410
"110
<270
,w270
I80
190
200
180
360
190
1700
120
940
160
270
140
90
360
440
190
320
240
230
290
260
ISO
300
270
170
Lead
120^
70
90
90
260-
234;
100
too
390
190
190
240
140
80
90
130
190
210
170
210
320
890
730
1900
1000
660
Mercury
'-•
160
80
J
' 270
200
80
360
680
80
260
110
100
70
230
70
170
200
250
60
50
50
NOTE: Adapted from Tables 4, 6,10, and 12 of Appendix H of the G&H Landfill Interim Rl Report.
-------
Table E-2
CONCENTRATION OF COMPOUNDS IN MAMMALS CAPTURED ADJACENT TO THE G&H LANDFILL
MUSCLE TISSUE SAMPLES
(ug/kg)
COMPOUNDS
Body
Sample Weight Length Sample Percent
Number Species Sex (kilograms) (cm) Type Lipids
MAMMALS
W1001 Muskrat Male 0.75 23.5 Muscle Tissue 13.3
W1002 Muskrat Male 1 26 Muscle Tissue 9.6
W1003 Raccoon Female 3.5 42.5 Muscle Tissue 18
W1004 Opossum Female 3.4 44 Muscle Tissue 33.2
W1005 Opossum Female 1.85 40 Muscle Tissue 13.1
W1006 Opossum Female 2.35 43.5 Muscle Tissue 5.3
W1007 Raccoon Female 4.05 43.5 Muscle Tissue 11
W1008 Raccoon Female 4.55 43.5 Muscle Tissue 8.2
W1009 Opossum Male 2.25 42 Muscle Tissue 13.6
Bis 2 ethyl
Hexyl
Phthalate
20800
40900
7880
4.4'DDT
71
465
930
7300
2020
4,4'DDE
10
17
150
531
2060
464
7290
2950
4,4'DDD
12
71
51
110
450
Endrin
4
Heptachlor
Epoxide
59
PCB-1254
4330
637
PCB-1260
640
541
4460
850
966
220
Cadmium
44
184
37
29
Chromium
280
1500
360
1900
200
50
130
1400
Lead
560
200
240
1100
240
120
830
70
NOTE: Adapted from Tables 14 and 16 of Appendix H of the G&H landfill Interin Rl Report.
O
u
V-,!
.j •— ,J
,;~ o K g
i.- •"•' pi u
c
a.
J-,
y.
^*
•^
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
All fish and crayfish tested contained both PCB-1254 and PCB-1260. PCB-1254,
which was detected at the site, was found in two mammals; PCB-1260 was found
in six of the mammals tested.
The DDT derivatives 4,4'DDE and 4,4'DDT were detected in groundwater. All
fish and crayfish samples and 89 percent of the mammal samples showed the
presence of 4,4'DDE. An additional DDT derivative, 4,4'DDD, was present in
most of the fish samples, half of the crayfish samples, and over half the
mammals tested. Over half the mammals sampled also had 4,4'DDT.
The organic and inorganic substances detected in the fish and crayfish may have
been from the G&H Landfill site. The mammals sampled have home ranges
that include the site but also extend beyond the site boundaries. (See
Appendix H of the G&H Landfill Draft RI Technical Report for further
information.) For these reasons, the presence of organic and inorganic
substances in the animal life near the G&H Landfill cannot be directly linked to
the site as a primary source. However, the potential for environmental exposure
exists, especially through exposure to contaminated soil, groundwater seeps, and
the resulting runoff of contaminated surface water.
POTENTIAL AQUATIC IMPACTS FROM DISCHARGE
OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
Groundwater sampling results for various organic and inorganic substances were
combined in the same manner as for Chapter 5, corresponding to the five areas
at the G&H Landfill site (see Tables E-3 to E-8).
Shallow groundwater from the site is thought to discharge to both the ponds and
wetlands south and west of the site and the Clinton River. The volume of
E-5
-------
TableE-3
COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
G&H LANDFILL - AREA 1
Chemical
ORGANICS:
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzene
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Diethylphthalate
Ethylbenzene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenol
Xylene (total)
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
,,»,
FOOTNOTES:
''"Site
Background
Concentration
for Inorganics
ug/l
88
18
188
2
708
1
81
1195
Area! ""
Concentration
Upper 95th
Percentile
ug/l
538.28
30.24
218.57
47.92
14.26
337.53
14.78
15.69
6659.37
98.87
57.95
900.29
6.00
23247.27
4.17
29.35
857.69
%• r-
8 -tO
(a) (b)
Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by by
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone. 0.1 x Cone.
-
750 (6)
360 (3)
-
16 (3)
-
197 (3) '
3124 (2) *
211 (4) *
11600
2120
5300
940
940
32000
5850
10200
87 (6)
190 (3) 3243
5000
11 (3)
1000 (1)
7.7 (3) '
162 (2)*
191 (4)*
..
3 LOEL-C LOEL-C
3 LOEL-C
2560 -
FWQC-C
812 -
_
_
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
_
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
^PfO
-
NCDTE'i-'TrWbackground concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
t< Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water, jj-y;
^•.i .Assumed Hardness (mg 200 .,-^
(aij&T" - •' --
SeO
two
j (.;.
OOOi '5'
iral Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources. . .nr,
•Quality Criteria for Water' (Red Book), U.S. EPA; July 1976
Prom 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
' ~~ ' shjHild.npt be exceeded at anytime.' Chronic crite^jori relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: .Acute criterion p(. K ,„,,;,.,,.,
reflects a one hour average not tq.be. exceeded more^han once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
(3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29,1985.
(4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2,1987.
(5) From 53 FR 177, January 5.1988.
(6) From 53 FR 33177, August 30, 1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS:
FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Acute
FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic
-------
Table E-4
COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
G&H LANDFILL - AREA 2
•: "-Ji. 1!
fifcwjWQali i-n
ORMfc'£|^y;.\-
4,4'^pq^uoi, HMVrnir
B,ej)Ben»jin?qo^-; ",;
Napthalene
Phenol
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Iron
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Site
Background
., Concentration
'I.V-"..;.-.-. -.-1 •ug/C.rih ,.:;•
(-Ui-Xtl'J (i :. /i..V'(»i. i
•>i.'f)' n i;' "-by 1'"^
o!28 "
w«!0i: 12.50
6.40
4.85
327.45
104.89
528.34
17291.38
2.64
2393.00
197.35
(a) (b)
Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Criteria . ,,, .,, . ,,, Acute ^ .Chronic . by Existing by by
- ... ug/l ugl . I-*" -V ;«M9"..i. •!,,.:. '., ug/l.... ,. 1,-einui Concentration 0.01 x Cone. 0.01 x Cone.
C'!"-1:-' " '!•'
' IS.X
i.V p)1'1"'"
. T
750 (8)
360 (3)
197 (3)'
3124 (2) "
211 (4) *
.(,•«,!.{.-, 1(,IC«3- 105°
0.001 (2)
5300
250
10200
87 (6)
190 (3) 3243
5000
1000 (1)
7.7 (3)*
162 (2) *
191 (4) *
.••r'lrr-, (. •••:••!.' M|!IOj'
FWQC-C FWQC-C FWQC-C
50 -
2560 -
FWQC-C
812 -
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
FWQC-C FWQC-C
FWQC-C
FOOTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
* Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
Assumed Hardness (mg/l): 200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
(1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water' (Red Book). U.S. EPA; July 1976
(2) From 45 FR 79318. November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
should not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: Acute criterion
reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
(3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29, 1985.
(4) From 52 FR 6213. March 2, 1987.
(5) From 53 FR 177, January 5,1988.
(6) From 53 FR 33177. August 30.1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS: V
FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria-Acute "• WjVHI>?' :M ( •••/>•(... vs ii,' ,t\%. i ' •
FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic '• "
LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic
-------
Table E-5
COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
G&H LANDFILL - AREA 3
Chemical
ORGANICS:
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Ethyl benzene
Phenol
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Site
Background
Concentration
(or Inorganics
ug/l
88
18
188
2
708
1
81
1195
Area3
Concentration
Upper 95th
Percentile
ug/l
51.24
14.94
2.67
2.56
24.70
6.60
6.32
12.64
397.57
33.74
1214.31
5.36
34354.36
7.12
86.14
95.05
(a) (b)
Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by by
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone. 0.01 x Cone.
-
750
360
-
16
-
197
3124
211
(«)
(3)
<3)
(3)'
*
<4)*
-
87
190
-
11
1000
7.7
162
191
2120
5300
250
28900
940
940
32000
10200
(6)
(3) 3243
5000
(3)
0)
(3)'
<2)'
W
50
1240
3 LOEL-C
3 LOEL-C
2560
FWQC-C
812
_
_
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
_ _
• n •- r*
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
FOOTNOTES: r.,.N
NOTE - The background concentrations ,were developed^ Chapter 3.
y.Cjjtflrjon is dependent on the hardness^)! the water, ^-vio
is-?
RV
200
jarFederal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
b!" (l)IFrom'Quality Criteria for Water'(Red Book), U.S. €PA; July 1976 - icsan •.'"'Yj
S'"'(2VFTpm 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute crltefton reflects a concentration which
O».ie Vilinduld not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: Acute criterion
/9f[ep(8 a, one hour average ppt.to be exceeded nwije than once every 3 years on the averager Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average (,7H,i
concentration not to be exceede^fflore than.once in,3 years on the average. ...... -),<"•>><• r>>
(3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29. ,19815,, ,.„!-. ..
(4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2, 1987.
(5) From 53 FR 177, January 5.1988.
(6) From 53 FR 33177. August 30.1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS:
FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Acute
FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic
> i :•?!..•
(/ i x e'^r
-------
Table E-6
COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
G&H LANDFILL - AREA 4
Site Areal (a) (b)
Background Concentration Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
(.I)-' ••: . . !
'JODvOII;I'i;;.;i. i
ORGANteSji • "'•" "" ««'•••
BenfeeWnll"*vky \OTM*
Phehdlt"?'1' ,O'!''fii>. •;'!!
lr^ORGtAN/C^:| -,t..j0r!' ,
^"jnln^nj, ,,. .(pijam^-mj
Arsenic . ,•• „,,,.,
Barium
Iron
Nickel
..Concentration Upper 95th Acute
,., fprlnorganjcs. .,. ,, ,f?ercenflle^ „,, . Criteria
1 *-..:,=.ij* HQ/I,,, .; . ,iv'..«.|f,n MBflU !!.«.! O:.rM . Ug/l ,
•{"•ifi'i MI ii'..'C!!if"(|4.Wal!t^r!"l'"'1 - •' ::i^!>"li '
O".i !"' M'"pS%t(t"»M<«oi- 232-40 7SO <6>
188 472.03
708 5385.91
81 21.60 3124 (2) *
Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by by
„•.-. MOfl . •-.,..,-, nmiMafl,!., :-,,<..... r. "8* .s'tn Concentration 0.1 x Cone. 0.1 x Cone.
•„•»..-.!<»•*.>«:•.->... !-:,,:c-i ;;xn ,- -R. v^«" ^'i-'!™>
>i!" .r"!--i"^ v'i"i'?>;'83(J8'!'!'>ur"''!"r:'-'l'CP-''7f!'": ***'"•=••'
10200 2560
IIQ^MUC? vohtoo'-r'
87 (6) - - FWQC-C
190 (3) 3243 812
5000 - -
1000 (1) - - FWQC-C
162 (2)' -
-
_
-
—
FOOTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
* Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
Assumed Hardness (mg 200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
(1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water* (Red Book). U.S. EPA; July 1976
(2) From 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
should not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: Acute criterion
reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
(3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29,1985.
(4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2.1987.
(5) From 53 FR 177. January 5.1988.
(6) From 53 FR 33177, August 30,1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS:
FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria-Acute
FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic ,,
.. '•. • f.,.. ,i||i'in. :. i •
•-VHI3OH . •
•.'•••if-M I": ~: t.r HIV I O!iv'Oi>VJiC p: lr M.'( ! GO. HOI
-------
Table E-7
COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
G&HLANDFILL - AREAS
r i
Chemical
ORGANICS:
Trichloroethene
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Iron
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
Site
Background
• ' • Concentration •
(or Inorganics
ug/l
88
18
188
2
708
0
81
1195
Areal
Concentration
. Upper 05th
Percent! le
ug/l
8.25
1454.95
8.85
296.90
41.10
9836.71
0.27
30.66
566.14
(a)
Federal Water Quality Criteria
Acute
Criteria
ug/l
-
750 (6)
360 (3)
-
16 (3)
-
2 (3)
3124 (2) *
211 (4) *
Chronic
Criteria
ug/l
-
87 (6)
190 (3)
-
11 (3)
1000 (1)
0.012 (3)
162 (2)'
191 (4) *
(b)
Lowest Reported Effects Level
Acute
ug/l
45000
-
3243
5000
-
-
-
-
"
Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Chronic by Existing by
ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone.
_ _
FWQC-A, FWQC-C FWQC-C
812
_
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
FWQC-C
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
Criteria Exceeded
by
0.1 x Cone.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
FOOTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
* Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
Assumed Hardness (mg 200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
(1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water1 (Red Book). U.S. EPA; July 1976
(2) From 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
should not be exceeded at any lima. Chronic criterion jelects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6:, Acute criterion
reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average ' ' "'
' concentration not to be exceeded ifiore than once In Syears on the°average. l05 ;'
IvV.i '
'"
'8 ™
««»yoo
SMO
t (3) From 50 FR 30784. July 29.1985.
',rMFrom 52 FR6213, March 2.1987^08
V it) IrlW 53 FR 177- January 5.1988. °
v, eA?]from M FR 33177' August 30,1989.
(b) Npi'enough data was available to derFVfe a numerical n'dticflal water quality criteria for aquaffc life protection for"113
^' trje»9chemical8. Values reflect lowe^reported effe'cts'ie'vels. From 45 FR>9318. Novemb%> 1980.
te «•
moo
u
4«
b'AOC--V
bf/.OC-V
-Mor, -c
ABBREVIATIONS: .. _
FWQ6-A:"Fe*)ral Water Quality Criteria - Acute "a
FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality CriteWtf- Chronte»'^»
LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects fcevel - Acute: -i n
LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic :,
fi'J\'
C ''
< C-'«:'
^uio
0'" i' (JOUi-
•^
r;i •• . f •-, ,-,,.,J(
-------
Table E-8
COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
G&H LANDFILL - LEACHATE WELLS
!"' ;'•
liUKd
INOR
Chr»
Cop$
Nicke
Silver
Zinc
Site Areal (a) (b)
-v . Background . Concentration Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
.., <:,,, ^concentration! Upper 95th Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
;t -C i i • : ,"'" ! TfodTriorgahrbs^ i • Percentile Criteria Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by
'"CherriicaV-''"1 '''"-'" :' 'i!:Nug/r'll!/"^'"'!l'' ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone.
SANICS:
Jj«ii83fca33Jn-vnC.-A3fJ8B|' j^ ^ ,3,
RWi'WfcH IV, W''i3l*2 .|369'0 214Q 16 pjj
, ."', bH6S'3 '^'^.I'.^OS 40067.00
•f'KI. f l_i f^y "O^P^I '! • v^t'' «sitl? 4 4A jIA 4OY tfi\ •
1 18.40 197 (3)
• .'; t);'!'-1|!0li 1101 /'.i pi' Ovv:ooq'^ll^(:|iJ (pit; C'K. iiu gi«tllg oil l!"»«»i '.v •
" ..0. ..„„.„.; r,,.2.K»,,.,,...ir,, 13 (2)'
1195 ,,686.30 , 211 (4) *
>• ', '"l<\yip IM9 tiiofaci!0" <^43
11 (3)
11 (3)
1000 (1)
7.7 (3)'
162 po-
ll -i •","' • • >•"••• • i-.nsci
191 (4) *
FWQC-A. FWQC-C FWQC-C
812
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
FWQC-C FWQC-C
FWQC-C
^O.i2Vrl .^I^EL-C LOEL-C
- ' 'FWQC-A. FWQC-C
Criteria Exceeded
by
0.1 x Cone.
-
FCXDTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
* Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
Assumed Hardness (mg 200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria lor Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
(1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water* (Red Book), U.S. EPA; July 1976
(2) From 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
should not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: Acute criterion
reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
(3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29.1985.
(4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2,1987.
(5) From 53 FR 177, January 5,1988.
(6) From 53 FR 33177, August 30,1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS:
FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Acute
FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic ,'ij: y . „,,.,
MHv'in, !
,'HCY -
i1? l-OLf VOflV.tir I'll.!.' H.*Oj!-'C.ll(H-l
-------
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
groundwater discharging and the potential dilution of groundwater in these
surface water bodies is not known. Leachate from the Phase I Landfill is
believed to discharge to the wetlands south of the landfill. The wetlands drain
to the Clinton River.
To assess the potential for aquatic impacts from the discharge of contaminated
groundwater and leachate, contaminant concentrations in those media were
compared to federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria for aquatic life protection.
Where criteria do not exist, the concentrations were compared to the lowest
observed effects levels published (U.S. EPA 1980).
Comparisons were made for five groundwater areas (see Appendix B for
discussion and summary of data) and for the leachate wells. The groundwater
concentration used was the 95th percentile for the arithmetic mean and the
average of the three leachate wells. Because the potential dilution of
groundwater with leachate is not known, the groundwater concentrations were
compared to criteria assuming no dilution, dilution by l/10th and dilution by
l/100th. The results are presented in Tables E-3 through E-8.
Several chemicals in undiluted groundwater exceed the criteria. They are
aluminum, di-n-butyl phthalate, diethylphthalate, iron, zinc, DDT, chromium, and
mercury. DDT and iron exceed criteria at l/100th of this groundwater
concentration. In the leachate, criteria are exceeded by undiluted leachate
concentration for aluminum, chromium, copper, iron, lead, silver, and zinc. Only
iron exceeded its criterion at l/100th of the leachate concentration.
This analysis indicates that, depending on the actual volume of groundwater
discharge and dilution in the surface water, there may be a potential for aquatic
impacts for the discharge of groundwater and leachate.
GLT959/004.50
E-6
-------