EJBD
ARCHIVE
EPA
540-
R-
90-
005
                            Agency Review Draft

                   REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
                              Volume 2 of 2

                          G&H LANDFILL SITE
                         Shelby Township, Michigan
                    WA 12-5170.0/Contract No. 68-W8-0040

                              March 16, 1990
This document has been prepared for the-.lJSrEnvironmehtiirFr6tection Agency
    '    •-'  *    •'   .''• ("•—  f •    '       '         £     .-'  •  •->-"•"''''' j"1/ '-"'  " ^"^  L
under Cbhtract No. 68-W8-004Q. The material contained^ her4in; K> Cbhsidered::
confidential and isnotip be disclosed tp, :discmse^^tf^br^mai^ayi^abl? to
any person'br persons for any reason withoutVthe pribt: e^eWagprcwai of a
responsiblb official' of tbte U.S. Environmental Protection; Agency,
GLT959/019.50-2

-------
                           Appendix A
                  TECHNICAL MEMORANDUMS
GLT959/020.5Q-1

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1	 AGENCY REVIEW


TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:     Isaac H. Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         Jan Williams/GLO

DATE:      November 30, 1989

SUBJECT:  Round 1 Field Sampling
            G&H Landfill Phase III RI

PROJECT:  GLO65561.FI.FQ
                                INTRODUCTION

Round 1 field sampling took place from November 28 to December 2, 1988, at the
G&H Landfill site as part of the Phase III remedial investigation/feasibility study
Additional Phase III field activities will take place in the spring of 1989.  The
G&H Landfill is located in Shelby Township, Macomb County, Michigan, and issituated
on approximately 100 acres (Figures 1 and 2).  The landfill comprises three distinct fills
areas (Figure 3):

       •     .Original Disposal Area
             Phase II Landfill
       •      Phase III Landfill

The original disposal area may be further subdivided into specific features:

             Oil Pond No.  1
             Oil Pond No. 2
             Fish Pond
       •      Suspected Co-disposal Area

The G&H landfill began  operating in 1955,as a,wa.ste oil recovery facility.? .State, reports,
indicate that an estimated 650,000 gallons of oiT per mpn^
were solvents, paint residues, varnishes, paint thinners and lacq^
sludges;  A consent order issued in May  1966, by the  Macomb Cqunty jQircuit'Cpurt
prohibited disposal of paints, paint thinners and lacquers, and;vart»ishes.r Oil^ re,clarnajipn
activities were not banned.  In May 1966, the site was used for co-disppsal; of municipaj.
waste as well as liquid industrial wastes (excluding oil).  In MarcH 1967, the Macomb
County Circuit Court also banned the disposal of liquid industrial wastes, sludges ^

-------
               *••  -.
                                                             :!
  Prage-2	_
 ^NbVembirSO, 1989 j.
  GL6655J61.Fi.FQ   i
                                         •
                    xj          ;         /

                MEMJORANDUM NO. 1 '
                                                                    DRAFT

  jnuds.  /Ilie landfill cpntinued tp serve as avmunieipal refuse disposal site until it was
  closed in 1973.     !'?          /'    ----^.""'"  c~               '
             I.Objectives ol the/Phase Ill-field activities are to collect additional data, for
  ^yaluatii^ public healthjfirfsks from site contaminants and to develop and evaluate remedial
  acfifrn'^alteroatares:tor the site.-^Specific objectives are to:                   '     /
                   '  ;•/   .-,   -.-       )     ^
              rC^o^get-data-to support and Complete a quantitative risk assessr
_^JLt*L! A«
                     i ! t  >;
            .- -More lai<
                  6—.^. -,,^:                    -•'  "       i
             atejy estimate' the sizecand characteristics of the contaminant
                                                   potential future releases and to select
                            remedial alterna'tives that will contain, remove, trejat, or destroy
                          5 sources         •?.
                              ~ i-          ;s                     'j
         &T.-.  *Imp,rpye the ur^e'lstanding of^site hydrogeology to evaluate pot jntial
•/ cdntaminant pathways-for-sel^eting remedial alternatives te-cos
    • terftbve groundwater contaminants
    /-.••  i to          i           i
                                                                           jol^-contain,
  ;R0un.d Afield, .activities consisted of surface soil sampling, evaluation of the existing well
  .-riet^ojpk and samplfffg of groundwater from those wells, a residential and industrial well
  vsjgpj%y, ;§i\d jresidenltal well sampling.  Sediment and surface water sample collection was
  ^.aisb.^.^^^^^..^? part of this activity but, was not  accomplished.  Sediment and surface
     '  S(cqntairted a floating nonaqueous layer which cannot be analyzed  through routine
       ^ai:.;seryic^s.. A special analytical services (SAS) request will be prepared aad a CLP
                    designated before sampling surface water and sediments during^, later
  sampling round.                                                  .^ ""~~~~-^^/  '".  ^  -
   '    	                                                  * ';%?'*»»
                                                                              • S
                personnel and their responsibilities during the investigation -\yere:
  , Team Member:.  Jeff Keiser, Bryan Laude, John Gannon, Megan Morrisorl Dave
  Shekosk^. Jan .Williams, Cathy Kantowski,  Bob Klank (Warzyn Engineering)} and Katz
 \ prillfng were prisite. November 28 and 29.  Brian Monroe of the Michigan Department of
  Natural Resources visited the site on November 29.  Jim Maxwell from wArzyn
  Eng^nsenn^vfsited the site on November  30.                    - ^      (
  :- •-•"•- - -•'  s""../v/-V .T5 • '."-'.                                                      \

-------
              ..,
; SITE VICINITY;r
  G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
  TECH. MEMO. NO.tl

-------

                               OIL RECEIVING*
                               TANKS AND FLU
                                               INDUSTRIAL FILL COMPANY
                                       APPROXIMATE
                                       SITE
                                       BOUNDARY
            300:	•—
           SCALE IN FEET
 LEGEND
___ —   APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF
^____J   LANDFILL AREAS
Note: Location of all structures and.site
     features are approximate.
                                                                                      FIGURE 2
                                                                                      SITE LOCATION
                                                                                      G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                      TECH. MEMO. NO. 1

-------

                                                                                 ^-V'Yf..    r*
                                                                           ;:••*" ^^CJ> "••&
                                                                           'V^TN   A'x-yrf" J1     rXr

                                                      kOfr0"^^ "" •{•'.
;;^COILPONDNO. 1-d
 ^ «*« ....   _         )> '

                                                       •:••#    <~ r  ^
                                                       «7'   Afe •-.
                                                                     SUSPECTED CO-DISPOSAL   ,.--,.,,,
                                                                ^ rAREA (SOLVENTS)^) ; ,.   .^ll&if


                                        /  COMMERCIAL &

           SITE PROPERTY BOUNDAR\
         f BURIED POND AND OTHER
w.rrrvrvTv^ I SUSPECTED CONTAMINANT
           SOURCE AREAS
             CONTOUR INTERVAL = ;1, FOOTJ   V\
             ••»   -    -    ' v  :2~' ' \ ';
             ^?    ^^"  ^'S1!1
            -'••.^.••.-.r^  V,--   >•!:--if.fl
           LEACHATE SEEP AREA
           OF PHASE III LANDFILL
                                                                                      ^as :,_ApSTE DISP^SAU AREA
                                                                                          ~" •••"*?"£ & H LANDFILL PHA"^"""1
                                                                                                 TECH. MEMO. NO. 1'

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1                     AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 3
November 30, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
                              FIELD ACTIVITIES

Samples were collected from the groundwater and surface soil. Groundwater samples
were obtained from monitoring, residential,  commercial, and industrial wells.  Samples
were submitted to laboratories in the U.S. EPA contract laboratory program (CLP) for
Routine Analytical Service (RAS) and Special Analytical Service (SAS) parameters.  RAS
parameters included target compound list metals, volatile and  semivolatile organic
compounds, pesticides, and PCBs.  The SAS parameters requested were dioxin, Atterberg
limits, and grain-size analysis.  The various media sampled and their corresponding
analytes are:

      •     Monitoring Well Groundwater—Total metals for filtered samples, volatile
            organic compounds, base/neutrals, acid extractables, pesticides, and PCBs

      •     Residential Well Groundwater--Volatile organic compounds, base/neutrals,
            acid extractables, pesticides, and PCBs

      •     Surface Soil-Pesticides, PCBs, dioxins/furans, grain-size analysis, and
            Atterberg limits

Detailed sampling procedures, equipment descriptions, and responsibilities are discussed in
the quality  assurance project plan (QAPP) approved October  21, 1988.  All sampling was
conducted as described in the QAPP,  except for the various necessary field modifications
described herein.

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING

Groundwater samples were collected from 51 existing monitoring wells at the site between
November 28 and December 2 (Figure 4).  The field crew was unable to obtain water
samples from several existing monitoring wells (Table 1).

Three replicates, five field blanks, and three trip blanks were collected as QA/QC checks.
The trip blanks were made using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) water
in the laboratory, carried to the field,  and shipped to the laboratories with the field
samples. The field blanks were prepared by pouring the HPLC water into a
decontaminated bailer  and transferring it  to appropriate sample containers. All blanks
were preserved and handled as if they were actual samples.

-------
                           Table I
                MONITORING WELLS—NOT SAMPLED
Well Number

GH04A

GH08A

GH08B

GH09A,
GH09B

GH11A

GH14A

GH15A
GH15B
GH15C

GH24A

RW5

RL9

RL10X

RW11

RW20


12
                Reason Not Sampled

Too small water volume in well (0.31 foot)

Well dry

Unable to open

One casing bent, tape would not advance beyond
4.5 feet; not able to locate other well

Dark brown oily liquid bottom 3.42 feet of tape

Unable to open


Wells destroyed, casings lying on ground


Dark brown oily liquid in well

Brown oily liquid bottom 7 inches of tape

Too small water volume in well (0.5 foot)

Too small water volume in well (0.94 foot)

Dark brown oily liquid in well

Casing bent, tape would not advance beyond
33.85 feet

Brown oily liquid in well
GLT661/45

-------
                                                                                                       RW7  ,^  )\

                                                                                                        . •' rr. L; f    i
                                                                                          ~.''   'r^°"'dj  ~'~~-'  :'\' •'•'• ••')' -T/^-s
^.}fy^^&^.
                                                                               /  ,	. ,  ^y,      •  -  v  •"•••i •
                                                                               /  ("*• n    -^   '- - '    ^   ;  «"•
                                                                               >[   v. "*--v; ^ j^~,  ,/'•-».  :••'•• •
 n GH10A,B,C

*H (1,600 FT.)
            I
                   LEGEND
                           EXISTING MONITORING WELL, NOT ABLE TO SAMPLE



                           EXISTING BORINGS



                           MONITORING WELL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

                           LOCATION
                    0            300



                      SCALE IN FEET
                                                                                                               FIGURE 4

                                                                                                               MONITORING WELL

                                                                                                               GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

                                                                                                               G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl

                                                                                                               TECH. MEMO. NO. 1

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1
Page 4
November 30,  1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
The static water level was measured before samples were collected using an electronic
water level indicator  (see Table 2).  The volume of the standing column of water was
calculated.  Monitoring wells that were adequately recharging were purged of at least five
volumes of static water volume prior to sampling.  Wells which would not recharge
sufficiently were bailed dry and then sampled on the same day.  All wells were purged
using  a bailer, peristaltic pump,  or bladder pump.   Volumes were  measured by emptying
the bailer or pumping directly into a 5-gallon bucket and counting the number of buckets
filled.

Wells were sampled immediately after purging using a 3-foot stainless steel bailer with a
Teflon check valve.  The nylon cord suspending each bailer was discarded between each
well.  Samples for volatile organics were collected  first. A sample for field parameter
determination  (pH, temperature, specific conductivity) was collected in a separate bottle
and returned to the sample preparation area for testing.  The results of field parameter
testing are presented in Table 3. When a duplicate was collected, the sample was evenly
distributed to all sample bottles.

Following sample collection, the bottles were returned to the sample preparation area,
where metals were filtered and preserved according to the provisions of the QAPP.
Monitoring well water samples submitted for metals analysis were  preserved with 2 ml of
concentrated nitric acid to a pH of less than 2.  Samples collected for volatile organic
analysis were preserved with two drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid per 40-ml vial.
All monitoring well samples were considered low concentration samples and were placed
in iced coolers after preservation.  Custody was  maintained by the CH2M HILL project
team  until samples were shipped to  the designated CLP laboratory. Table 4 documents
sample numbers, sample types, dates of shipment, and laboratory destinations.

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING

Eleven residential, industrial, and commercial well samples plus replicates and blanks were
submitted to the designated CLP laboratory (Figure 5) to determine potential hazards to
human health.  Residential well samples were collected by Jan Williams and Dave
Shekoski on November 28 and 29.

Whenever possible, residential well samples were collected from the kitchen or rest room
tap to reflect drinking water conditions.  When this was inconvenient or not possible,
samples were collected from an outside spigot.  Prior to sampling, residents were asked  if
their well water was treated.  Before collecting each sample, the water was turned on and
allowed to run for 10 minutes to purge the water  conveyance lines of standing water.

-------
                                          Table 2
                                  GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
Well
Number
GH01Aa
GH01B3
GH01C3
GH02A
GH02B
GH02C
GH03A
GH04Aa
GH04Ba
GH04C3
GH05A
GH06A
GH06B
GH07A
GH08A
GH08C
GH10Aa
GH10Ba
GH10C.
GH11A0
GH11B
GH12A
GH12B
GH13B
GH14B
GH14C
GH16Aa
GH16Ba
GH16C3
GH17Aa
GH17B3
GH17Ca
GH18Ba
GH19Aa
GH20A
GH20B
GH21A
GH22A
GH22B
GH23A
GH25A
GH26A
RD2X
RL4.
RW5b
RL6
RW7
RD8XX
RL9
RL10X
RW11D
RW12X
RW14
RL17
RD18a
RW19a
I2B
13
15
Date
Recorded
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
12-01-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-30-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
Top
of Casing
Elevation
(ft msl)
688.80
688.60
690.20
--
688.50
—
685.90
689.00
688.61
691.00
—
—
—
684.57
--
—
653.01
652.65
653.34
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
710.07
708.44
709.28
705.28
704.41
703.98
707.11
696.03
690.16
690.02
689.12
692.12
692.80
669.27
687.35
690.79
708.46
708.47
710.66
710.07
709.14
708.08
708.11
710.00
705.90
706.22
706.73
709.34
711.07
711.70
702.71
693.46
697.26
Depth to
Water Below
Top of Casing
(ft msl)
6.72
6.45
21.11
4.07
5.70
19.66
4.32
12.44
13.59
22.82
17.35
9.65
9.67
10.56
13.66
14.72
Flowing
3.53
4.19
10.50
9.88
8.24
8.22
8.00
9.45
32.44
15.86
14.39
32.45
11.32
10.40
15.51
12.30
6.89
7.08
7.00
4.34
4.10
3.70
14.09
5.15
6.56
15.06
16.10
24.34
18.40
18.14
18.42
18.50
16.05
19.65
18.34
20.50
21.35
19.89
21.10
11.00
4.28
10.39
Water
Level
Elevation
(ft msl)
682.08
682.15
669.09

682.80

681.58
676.56
675.02
668.18



674.01


—
649.12
649.15







694.21
694.05
676.83
693.96
694.01
688.47
694.81
689.14
683.08
683.02
684.78
688.02
689.10
655.18
682.20
684.23
693.40
692.37
686.32
691.67
691.00
689.66
689.61
693.95
686.25
687.88
686.23
687.99
691.18
690.60
691.71
689.18
686.87
Bottom of
Well Below
Top of Casing
(ft msl)
11.35
21.80
145.00
10.40
24.87
100.80
13.75
12.75
26.90
94.90
21.80
15.60
24.42
19.85
15.09
127.90
4.30
7.25
11.20
13.60
29.05
12.96
29.67
17.50
41.50
100.80
25.05
49.70
85.20
20.00
46.90
84.90
44.70
15.00
15.93
38.84
16.32
15.24
41.42
33.02
14.48
13.40
49.05
20.20
—
20.24
34.48
40.30
19.00
16.99
—
28.34
31.46
29.47
36.90
28.30
17.00
17.00
16.67
jjTop of Casing measurements  refer  to inner casing  (riser)
 Oily liquid found in well
GLT661/54

-------
                                   Table 3 (page 1 of 2)
                             MONITORING WELL FIELD PARAMETERS
   Well
  Number

GH01A
GH01B
GH01C
GH02A
GH02B
GH02C
GH03A
GH04B
GH04C
GH05A

GH06A
GH06B
GH07A
GH08C
GH10A
GH10B
GH10C
GH11B
GH12A
GH12B
GH13B
GH14B
GH14C
GH16A
GH16B
GH16C
GH17A
  Date

11-29-88
11-29-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-02-88

12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-28-88
             Temperature
  8
  7
 10
 11
 12
  9
 10
  9
  8
10.5

  8
 11
12.5
 8.5
  9
  9
 10
 11
 10
10
8.5

 7
4.5
5.5
7.8
 6
Specific
Conductivity
pH (umhos/cm
(SU) at 25°C)
7.39
7.72
6.93
7.21
7.17
7.25
7.10
7.45
8.14
6.87
6.83
6.96
6.95
7.28
7.20
7.10
7.07
7.68
6.91
1091
539
7143
1389
1351
1324
1529
897
712
1732
2273
2222
1440
3134
5294
1618
2000
903
1171
            7.26
            7.14
            7.45
           12.14
            7.14
            7.95
            9.72
            7.15
 771
1119
 320*
 523
1017
 418
 107
1661
                                           Comments/
                                         Observations
                                   Purged dry after 6 gal.
                                   Water was light red with
                                   small oil droplets.
                                   Water initially was light
                                   brown.
                                   Water initially was
                                   tinted black.

                                   Purged dry after 30 gal.
Water was grey-brown,
turbid with oily sheen,
small oil droplets, odor.

Water was initially light
brown-grey and turbid,
slight odor.
Purged dry after 15 gal.

Purged dry after 8 gal.
Purged dry after 12 gal.
Water was initially red
and turbid.
GH17B
GH17C
GH18B
GH19A
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
12-01-88
           6.91
          11.72
           7.19
           7.36
                         452
                        1500
                         508
                         727
            Purged dry after 14 gal.

            Water was initially
            red and turbid.
GH20A
GH20B
GH21A
GH22A
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
11-29-88
8.5
 9
10
            6.72
            9.68
            6.73
                                          7.47
1231
 221
1414
                                         968
Purged dry after 7 gal.
Purged dry after 2 gal.,
water initially was
tinted black.

Purged dry after 2 gal.,
water was tinted black.

-------
                                   Table 3 (page 2 of 2)
   Hell
  Number

GH22B
GH23A
GH25A
GH26A
RD2X
RL4
RL6
RW7

RD8XX
RW12X
RW14
RL17
RD18
RW19

13
15
  Date

11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-01-88

12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88

11-30-88
12-01-88
Specific
Conductivity
Temperature pH (umhos/cm
(°C) (SU) at 25°C)
5.5
5
9.5
11
10
10
10
9
10
10
9
9
9
9
11
11.5
11.24
9.21
7.15
7.03
7.56
6.56
6.67
6.88
7.04
6.82
6.81
6.97
7.18
6.88
8.99
6.60
658
583
1304
1111
400
2114
2429
1147
1071
1286
2044
1206
1147
2926
972
1808
        Comments/
      Observations

Purged dry after 1 gal.
Purged dry.
Water was tinted black,
had small oil droplets
and strong odor.

Water initially was
tinted black, oily, very
odorous.

Water initially was grey.
Water was light grey,
foamy, very odorous,
slightly turbid.

Water had oily sheen,
moderate odor.

Slight odor.
Water was tinted black,
slightly turbid, odorous.

Slight odor.
•Specific conductivity not corrected to 25°C as no temperature reading available.
GLT661/53

-------
     Table 4 (Page 1 of 2)
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX-
       MONITORING WELLS
Sample
Number
GH-GH01A-01
GH-GH01B-01
GH-GH01C-01
GH-GH02A-01
GH-GH02B-01
GH-GH02C-01
GH-GH03A-01
GH-GH04B-01
GH-GH04C-01
GH-GH05A-01
GH-GH06A-01
GH-GH06B-01
GH-GH07A-01
GH-GH08C-01
GH-GH10A-01
GH-GH10B-01
GH-GH10C-01
GH-GH11B-01
GH-GH12A-01
GH-GH12B-01
GH-GH13-01
GH-FRGH13-99
GH-GH14B-01
GH-GH14C-01
GH-GH16A-01
GH-GH16B-01
GH-FRGH16B-99
GH-GH16C-01
GH-GH17A-01
GH-GH17B-01
GH-GH17C-01

GH-GH18B-01
GH-GH19A-01
GH-GH20A-01
GH-GH20B-01
GH-GH21A-01
GH-GH22A-01
GH-GH22B-01
GH-GH23A-01
GH-GH25A-01
GH-GH26A-01
GH-RD2X-01
GH-RL4-01
GH-RL6-01
GH-RW7-01
GH-FRRW7-01
GH-RD8XX-01
GH-RW12X-01
GH-RW14-01
GH-RL17-01
GH-RD18-01
GH-RW19-01
GH-I3-01
GH-I5-01
GH-GWFB01
GH-GWFB02
GH-GWFB03
GH-GWFB04
Collection
Date
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
.11-30-88
11-30-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88

11-28-88
12-01-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-01-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
Time
1340
1342
1115
1421
1410
1440
1054
1030
1020
0915
1135
1200
0920
1445
1610
1557
1550
1530
1154
1202
1540
1540
1239
1555
1220
0930
0930
1005
1405
1315
1345-
1705
1715
1010
1320
1315
1617
1110
1105
1005
1035
1040
0900
1626
1602
0834
0834
0945
1251
1430
1510
1245
1240
1655
1125
1510
1630
0830
1000
Shipment
Date
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88

11-28-88
12-01-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
12-01-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
11-30-88
12-01-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-30-88
12-02-88
Laboratory
Organics ,
Pesticides,


PCBs Metals
EMS I
EMSI
WANTEC
EMSI
EMSI
WANTEC
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
WANTEC
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
WANTEC
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
EMSI
WANTEC
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL
RMAL

-------
                                   Table 4 (Page 2 of 2)


                                                                	Laboratory
                                                                 Organics,
   Sample          	Collection            Shipment         Pesticides,
   Number            Date          Time          Date              PCBs            Metals

GH-GWFB05          12-02-88        1520        12-02-88           WANTEC            RMAL
GH-GWTB01          11-29-88        1515        11-29-88            EMSI
GH-GWTB02          11-30-88        1540        11-30-88            EMSI
GH-GWTB04          12-01-88        1600        12-01-88            EMSI
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
EMSI = Environmental Monitoring and Services, Camarillo, California
RMAL = Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical, Arvada, Colorado
WANTEC = Wan Technologies, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia

GH-FRGH16B-99 was a replicate of GH-GH16B-01
GH-FRGH13-99 was a replicate of GH-GH13-01
GH-FRRW7-01 was a replicate of GH-RW7-01

GH-GWFB01, GH-GWFB02, GH-GWFB03, GH-5WFB-4 and GH-6WFB05 were field blanks
GH-GWTB01, GH-GWTB02, and GH-GWTB04 were trip blanks


GLT661/49

-------
                             OIL PONDS & SOLVENT
                             DISPOSAL AREA
                                            APPROXIMATE FILL
                                            LIMITS
                                                                                                                                                     400
                                                                                                                                           APPROXIMATE
                                                                                                                                          SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND

GR04IS RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING LOCATION
                                                                                                                                                FIGURES
                                                                                                                                                RESIDENTIAL WELL
                                                                                                                                                SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                                                                                                G & H LANDRULPHASE III Rl
                                                                                                                                                TECH. MEMO. MO. il

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1
Page 5
November 30, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Faucet aerators were removed to avoid the volatilization loss of organic compounds.
Temperature, pH, and specific conductivity were measured at each sampling location.
Results of the field parameter analyses are presented in Table 5.  Residential wells that
could not be sampled are listed in Table 6.

Residential water sample bottles were placed in coolers and shipped to the CLP laboratory
for analysis of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs.  Custody
of samples was  maintained until samples were packaged and shipped to the designated
CLP laboratory (see Table 5).

SURFACE SOIL SAMPLING

A total of 26 surface soil samples plus replicates were collected by John Gannon and
Bryan Laude  on December 2. The samples were taken from the  surface of the original
landfill area, Phase II landfill, Phase III landfill, and  offsite in the auto salvage area and
around the pile perimeter. Five background samples were taken north of 23 Mile Road.
Soil sampling locations are shown in Figure 6.

Surface soil grab samples were collected  from the top 6 inches of soil using a stainless
steel trowel.  Soils were placed in sample jars and then into an iced cooler.  A shovel was
used to determine the approximate depth of the soil cover at each sample location.
Descriptions of soil types and layers encountered while digging are listed in Table 7.

Sample custody was maintained by CH2M HILL personnel until samples were shipped to
the designated CLP laboratory (Table 8).

The results of geotechnical laboratory testing are contained in Attachment 1.

SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

On November 30, Dave Shekoski and Jan Williams attempted to obtain surface water and
sediment samples from the oil seep area as planned  in the QAPP. A surface water
sample collected at the first location was very oily with a visible nonaqueous layer on top
of the water and along the surface of the container.  The sediment taken at that location
was also very oily.  A decision was made not to submit those  samples for RAS analysis.
An SAS request for analysis of soil and water samples with oil will be prepared and
samples will be collected in future field visits.  No  other surface water and sediment
samples were taken as it was expected that  the same type of oily  samples would be
obtained at other locations.

-------
                                                                   . Table 5
                                                           RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLES
Note:  All samples were tested at Compuchem Laboratories, North Carolina for organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs.
GR = Groundwater from residential well
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank

GH-GR10-99 was a replicate of GH-GR10-01
GH-GR31-99 was a replicate of GH-GR31-01
GH-GRFB-01 and GH-GRFB-02 were field blanks
GH-GRTB-01 and GH-GRTB-02 were trip blanks
 Samples shipped same day as collected

GLT661/SO
                                                                                                                                    Specific
Collection
Sample
Number
GH-GR01-01
GH-GR02-01

GH-GR03-01

GH-GR04-01

GH-GR06-01
GH-GR10-01
GH-GR10-99
GH-GR13-01
GH-GR14-01
GH-GR19-01
GH-GR21-01
GH-GR31-01
GH-GR31-99
GH-GRFB-01
GH-GRFB-02
GH-GRTB-01
GH-GRTB-02

Date3
11-28-88
11-28-88

11-28-88

11-28-88

11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-29-88
11-28-88
11-29-88
11-28-88
11-29-88

Time
1315
1355

1415

1425

1150
1240
1240
1550
1610
1630
1100
1700
1700
1210
1600
1700
1600

Well Depth Diameter
Residence (ft) (in.)
Beebe Oil Co.
Porta John
Corporation-1
Porta John
Corporation-2
Porta John
Corporation-3
Acres
Piatt

Modular Data
Smith (tenant)
Reed
Miller
Meyer





50651 Ryan Road approx. 20 1-1/4

50633 Ryan Road Shallow ?

50591 Ryan Road Shallow ?

50575 Ryan Road Shallow ?
50758 Ryan Road ? ?
50568 Ryan Road ? ?

50150 Ryan Road 18 24
50000 Ryan Road 86 ?
4034 Kingmont ? ?
4014 23 Mile Road 40 to 45 2
50639 Parsons ? ?





Well Condu
Temperature pH (umhos/cm
(°C) (SU) at 25°C)
10 6.99 2714

12 7.22 2568

11 7.07 2361

12 7.10 1203
11 7.08 1007
11 7.58 833

11.5 7.04 1233
11.5 7.55 719
12 7.05 811
11 6.94 618
8 6.88 1061






-------
                          GH7A
                          D
                                                                     ^   i/  (v' D~\, ^  ••'  '  , ^• •• VV"' C%*vj>RD2X :  i
                                                                     J-^\     ^- -o i,s-5n2^-^
-------
                           Table 6
                RESIDENTIAL WELLS NOT SAMPLED
   Location

50800 Ryan

50401 Ryan

50625 Parsons

50611 Parsons

50552 Ryan

4033 Kingmont

Ryan Road,
23 Mile Road
  Reason Not Sampled

House vacant

Connected to city water

House vacant

Not home

Connected to city water

Connected to city water

No residents/businesses
found at these locations
GLT661/46

-------
                          Table 7  (Page 1 of 2)
                    DESCRIPTIONS OF SOILS ENCOUNTERED
                      DURING SURFACE SOIL SAMPLING
Sample
Number

SS01*
                         Description

0 to 2 inches silty clay, grey, moist, clay cap is
discontinuous; refuse encountered 2 inches below ground
surface.
SS02*      0 to 1.3 feet poorly graded sand, some gravel, light brown to
           grey, moist; refuse encountered 1.3 feet below ground
           surface.

SS03*      0 to 1.2 feet silty sand with some gravel, light to dark
           brown; no refuse encountered.

SS04       Silty sand, some gravel, brown to black.

SS05       Silty sand, brown to black.

SS06       Silty sand, brown to black.

SS07*      0 to 0.9 feet gravelly sand, light brown; refuse encountered
           below 0.9 feet.

SS08       Silty sand, some gravel, brown to black.

SS09       0 to 0.5 feet gravelly sand, dark brown; refuse encountered
           below 0.5 feet.

SS10*      0 to 0.6 feet silty clay, grey, stiff; 0.6 to 1.5 feet poorly
           graded sand, medium grained, light brown; no refuse
           encountered.

SS11*      0 to 1.1 feet well graded sand, light brown, medium grained,
           some clay lenses; 1.1 to 1.5 feet organic rich silty clay,
           grey-black, slight odor.

SS12       0 to 1.8 feet gravelly sand, dark brown; no refuse
           encountered.

SS13       0 to 1.4 feet gravelly sand, light to dark brown; no refuse
           encountered.

SS14       0 to 1.7 feet gravelly sand, light to dark brown; no refuse
           encountered.

-------
                          Table 7 (Page 2 of 2)
Sample
Number                              Description

SSI5*      0 to 0.9 feet sandy silt, some clay, grey-brown; black
           organic rich sand encountered at 0.9 feet below ground
           surface, sweet odor.

SS16*      0 to 0.9 feet interbedded grey silty clay and brown medium
           grained sand; layers 1 to 2 inches thick; refuse encountered
           at 0.9 feet below ground surface, sweet odor from refuse.

SS17       Silty sand, brown to black.

SS18       Silty sand, some gravel, brown to black.

SS19       Gravelly sand, brown.

SS20       Silty sand, some gravel, brown to black.

SS21       Gravelly sand, brown.

SS22*      0 to 0.3 feet organic rich sand, some silt; 0.3 to 0.7 feet
           lean clay, grey; 0.7 to 0.9 feet black waste-like organic
           matter.

SS23*      0 to 0.9 feet gravelly sand, dark brown; refuse encountered
           below 0.9 feet.

SS24*      0 to 0.9 feet gravelly sand, grey-black, organic rich lenses;
           below 0.9 feet black waste-like organic matter.

SS25*      0 to 0.5 feet silty sand, light brown; 0.5 to 1.0 feet silty
           clay, grey, stiff; 1.0 to 1.5 black organic matter with odor.

SS26*      0 to 1.9 feet sandy clay, some silt, brownish-grey, very
           stiff; refuse encountered at 1.9 feet below ground surface,
           sweet odor from refuse.
*Soil description of cap on Phase I (Original Disposal Area), II, or III
 landfills.
GLT661/60

-------
     Table 8 (Page 1 of 2)
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX--
     SURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
         GSH LANDFILL
                                 Laboratory
Sample
Number
GH-SS01-01
GH-SS02-01
GH-SS03-01
GH-SS04-01
GH-SS05-01
GH-SS06-01
GH-SS07-01
GH-FRSS07-99
GH-SS08-01
GH-SS09-01
GH-SS10-01
GH-SS11-01
GH-FRSS11-99
GH-SS12-01
GH-SS13-01
GH-SS14-01
GH-SS15-01
GH-SS 16-01
GH-FRSS16-99
GH-SS17-01
GH-SS18-01
GH-SS19-01
GH-SS20-01
GH-SS21-01
GH-SS22-01
Collection
Date
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
Time
1500
1442
1430
0933
0917
0900
1652
1652
0942
1545
1216
1300
1300
1600
1612
1525
1148
1108
1108
0956
1008
1020
1030
1040
1415
Shipment
Date
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-05-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
Pesticides/
PCBs Dioxin
DATAC
DATAC
DATAC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
DATAC
DATAC
WANTEC
DATAC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
DATAC
DATAC
DATAC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
WANTEC
DATAC
«
AATS
AATS
—
~
--
AATS
AATS
~
—
AATS
AATS
~
~
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
~
AATS
AATS
~
~
~
—
Grain
Atterberg Size
Limits Analysis
__
CHEN
—
„
__
--
CHEN
—
~
._
CHEN
CHEN CHEN
--
CHEN
—
CHEN
CHEN CHEN
CHEN CHEN
—
—
—
__
—
__
CHEN CHEN

-------
                                   Table 8 (Page 2 of 2)
                                                               Laboratory
Sample
Number
GH-SS23-01
GH-SS24-01
GH-SS25-01
GH-SS26-01
Collection
Date
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
Time
1632
1508
1245
1128
Shipment
Date
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
12-02-88
Grain
Pesticides/ Atterberg Size
PCBs Dioxin Limits Analysis
DATAC
DATAC
DATAC
DATAC
CHEN CHEN
CHEN CHEN
-_
"™ ~™ ~™
SS = Surface Soil
FR = Field Replicate
AATS = American Analytical and Technical Services, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
CHEN = Chen and Associates, Denver, Colorado
DATAC = Datachem, Salt Lake City, Utah
WANTEC = Wan Technologies, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia

GH-FRSS07-99 was a replicate of GH-SS07-01
GH-FRSS11-99 was a replicate of GH-SS11-01
GH-FRSS16-99 was a replicate of GH-SS16-01
GLT661/47

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1
Page 6
November 30, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
DECONTAMINATION PRACTICES

Soil Sampling Equipment

All soil sampling utensils were decontaminated between each use. Utensils were washed
with a trisodium phosphate and tap water solution, rinsed with tap water, washed with
10 percent methanol and deionized water solution, rinsed with deionized water, and air
dried.

Groundwater Sampling Equipment

Stainless steel bailers used for sampling wells were decontaminated between sample
locations.  Bailers were washed with the same solutions as the soil sampling equipment.
The peristaltic pump was decontaminated by running the sequence of decontamination
solutions through it after sampling each well.
GLT863/076.50

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2	AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:      Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         Don Johnson/GLO

DATE:      September 28, 1989

SUBJECT:   Geophysical Surveys
            G&H Landfill Phase III RI

PROJECT:   GLO65561.FI.FP


                                 OBJECTIVES


The objective of the geophysical investigation was to locate areas of buried metal. The
results of the investigation were used to select test pit and boring locations for subsequent
investigations to determine the nature of the buried metal.


                PREVIOUS GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Two geophysical surveys were previously performed at the site—a magnetometer survey in
1983 and an electromagnetic ground conductivity survey in  1984. The results from those
investigations were used to plan the Phase III RI geophysical investigation.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

A magnetometer survey was performed by GMC Associates, Inc., in December 1983 as
part of the Phase I RI.  Selected portions of the landfill were investigated to locate
probable sites of buried drums.  The GMC report  concluded that magnetic methods
produced data of limited use because of poor resolution, difficulties in obtaining readings
with the magnetometer, and high noise levels from scattered metal inherent with landfills.
CH2M HILL's review of the data indicated discrete anomalies that could have been
attributable to metal-filled trenches; however, the area covered by the survey did not fully
cover the possible trenches, thus complicating the interpretation.

ELECTROMAGNETIC GROUND CONDUCTIVITY  SURVEY

Lockheed-EMSCO, under contract with the EPA Las Vegas laboratory, conducted an
electromagnetic survey to determine the sources of contaminated groundwater found south
of the landfill. Conductivity readings were made using the  Geonics EM31 and EM34 with
20- and 40-meter coil separations.  No plume was  identified nor were any conductivity

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2
Page 2
November 9, 1989
GLO65561.FLFP
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
highs associated with the oil ponds.  Lockheed's report suggested, however, that the areas
of highest conductivities could be investigated for possible buried drums.
                                  PROCEDURES
The current geophysical investigation was conducted to locate areas of buried metal.  Since
the site is a landfill and metal may be distributed throughout the site, surveys were
designed to delineate areas of the site where higher concentrations of metal are located,
such as in trenches or filled-in ponds. Magnetic and electromagnetic methods were used
for locating buried metal.  Magnetic methods are preferred for locating buried metal, but
because of potential problems from widespread scattered metal, electromagnetic methods
were also performed.  The electromagnetic method is less responsive to the scattered
metal than the magnetometer, but it  can detect larger masses of buried metal. The results
of the  two surveys were used together to identify areas with the most buried metal.

ESTABLISHING THE GRID

A survey grid was established over the site before collection of geophysical data.  Figure 1
shows  the limits  of the survey and the grid coordinates. The grid was marked with a
40- by 40-foot grid of flags over the Phase I landfill and with an 80- by 40-foot grid over
Phase  II and III landfills.  A wider line spacing was used over the Phase II and III landfills
because there has been no reported industrial dumping there.  Fill-in lines were run where
anomalies were deleted.

The grid over the Phase I landfill is oriented parallel to the fence surrounding the
property of the portable toilet company.  The northwest corner of the fence is grid
location 2000 east and 600 north. The grid over the Phase II and III landfills was oriented
with magnetic north with grid location 1200 E and  200 N  at the fence corner, just north of
the gate at the east end of Phase II landfill.  Grid  units are in  feet.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

An EDA OMNI  IV magnetometer was used for the survey.  Magnetometer data were
collected at 20-foot intervals along lines  40 feet apart at the Phase I landfill. Lines were
80 feet apart at  the Phase  II and III landfills unless anomalies  were observed, in which
case additional lines were  added to obtain a 40-foot spacing.  The total  magnetic  field
intensity and vertical magnetic field were measured at each location.  Base station
measurements were made three to four  times per day to measure the amount of  diurnal
drift.  The drift was less than 50 gammas, which is negligible compared to the anomalies
measured over the landfills which measured thousands of gammas.  No drift correction was
performed.

-------
                                             500E
                                                                         1000E
                                                                                 '     '
J^
                                                                                                                        .I      I
2000E
 I
                                                                                                                                                I      I
1000N-
500N-
0 200
SCALE IN FEET
...........
PHASE III
LANDFILL
. .
.
.
.
.
.
•
.
.
.
.
•
•
.
.
.
.
•
•
.
.
«
!\ >- — =nr 	
	 ( \ // ....•• 	 • 	 v 	

• 1 '• N V -^ . , 1
\\ : \ Sr^Zf:
\ • \ >^-'y ^^ » . ii
\\ . * . . • »-•* ......... II —
\\ \ \ 1)
::
Ai 	 % «
r\K \ i
X^ •• \\ PHASE 1 LANDFILL i|
	 ^. •• \\ ii
	 ^^ '. \\ n
} '• ^ '•• \\ ii
/ \ ^^ '••• \\ }\
'•-. X"--, »
\XX'V
i 'x-.. M\
• *.. // x^
• / •*/. ^ ••.
/ / • /I •••. Ns '..
| " PHASE II LANDFILL// *"*XV^'-..
/ --.r.>;-,.. r^.^—
\ ""^>*. i
i .—i:====^^"''.. 3
1 • -^> •. -rr...«.^r.-r?^...x..
• -^ ••
	 	 	 • ^^ '..
»°» ' ' ' ° ' ' ' ' 50'OE ' WOOE ' 120'0E ^C'*''.
**O''.
NOTE: The grids for Phase I Landfill and Phase II ^ C^ * • .
and III Landfills are different. ^ ,. * • . .
^
                                                                                                                                                            — 0
                                                                                                                                                        FIGURE 1
                                                                                                                                                        APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF
                                                                                                                                                        GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS
                                                                                                                                                        G & H LANDFILL

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 3
November 9, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FP
The total field data are presented in the contour map (Figure 2).  A constant of
50,000 gammas was subtracted from each measurement to make data handling more
manageable.  The contour interval used is 1,000 gammas.  The actual value was divided by
1,000 for the label on each contour; thus  a contour interval of 5 represents
55,000 gammas.

Vertical gradient data were not used for the interpretation. The gradient data emphasized
the shallow, scattered metal and minimized the response of deeper, larger  masses  of metal.

ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

A Geonics  EM31 was used to collect ground conductivity data.  Measurements were made
at the same stations as the magnetometer survey.  Conductivity values were measured with
the EM31 oriented east-west  and north-south.  In-phase measurements were made in the
east-west orientation.  The contoured conductivity values are shown in Figure 3 and the
in-phase values in Figure 4.


                                INTERPRETATION
Both the total magnetic field data and the electromagnetic data were used to determine
the location of buried metal. Each set of data was interpreted separately, and the results
of each set were compared to better define targets.  The geophysical methods respond  to
different physical properties and the respective interpretations will not necessarily  delineate
the same areas.  The areas where both the magnetic and electromagnetic surveys  indicated
buried metal are considered to  be those most likely to contain large amounts of buried
metal.

The magnetic data were noisy, as they were in the Phase I RI.  However, anomalous areas
are easily identifiable on the contour map of magnetic intensity (Figure 2).  The anomalies
presented in Figure 2 are  due to areas of high concentrations of metal.  The location of
buried metal using the total magnetic field data was interpreted from the data plots in
Attachment 1 and shown in Figure 5. The  location of the magnetic source (the buried
metal) is not directly beneath the magnetic  highs. The source location was estimated as
extending from the magnetic high on the south side of the source to the low on the north
side.  This is an approximation, but the resolution provided by 20-foot station intervals  will
not support a more precise  determination of source location.

The electromagnetic  conductivity data were also used  to determine areas  of probable
buried metal. Because different measurements were made at each location,  it is possible
to predict shallow versus deeper buried metal. The extent of shallow metal  is shown in
Figure 6.  The shallow metal was delineated by mapping areas of negative conductivity
values  and areas where the  orthogonal conductivity values differ.  A difference of  more

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 4
November 9, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FP
than 30 percent was considered indicative of metal.  Negative conductivities are almost
always associated with buried metal.  The location of the shallow buried metal does not
correlate well with the magnetic data and is not thought to represent large masses of
metal.

The in-phase response will indicate buried metal either as negative values or as high
values.  The negative values are interpreted as being due to shallow metal, the same as
conductivity values. The in-phase highs are interpreted as being due to more deeply
buried, higher concentrations of metal.  Values greater than 10 (parts per thousand of the
primary field)  are considered significant and are shown superimposed on  the interpreted
source areas of the magnetic anomalies in Figure 5.


                                     RESULTS
Several interpreted zones of buried metal have been identified (Figure 5).  The limits of
each zone are based on the in-phase electromagnetic response, as these areas appear to
provide better definable targets than the interpreted source areas from the magnetometer
survey.  Specific locations for test pits have been identified using results of both the
magnetic survey and electromagnetic survey. Zones with both in-phase and magnetometer
anomalies were given the highest priorities assuming they have the most buried metal.
Zones with either  in-phase  or magnetic anomalies, but not both, were also selected but
were considered lower priority.

The shallow buried metal is not recommended for followup at this time.  The locations of
these areas do not correlate well with the locations of the sources of the magnetometer
anomalies and probably represent smaller, less continuous sources.  Table 1 summarizes
the proposed test pit locations.

PHASE I LANDFILL

Zones with Both In-Phase and  Magnetic Anomalies

Zone A. The highest conductivities were found on lines 480 E and  520 E and strongest
magnetic response was on line  520 E, from 1400 to 1480 N. This zone is about 150 feet
east of the oil ponds shown in  historical aerial photographs and  there are no features on
the surface to indicate the  nature of the source.  The magnetic source area is less
extensive than the in-phase source area, so  any followup should  target the magnetic
anomaly on line 520 E first.

Zone B. Both magnetic and in-phase electromagnetic responses had the  strongest
responses on line 960 E, from about 1310 N to 1370  N.  This is a limited portion of a
more extensive zone of magnetic and conductivity highs.

-------
1000N
SOON
                                                                                                                               a a 0 « 9/t * » »»• « «»^J«««»»
                                                                                                                               ^/1>^  r"^^.  n<^\  /

                                                                                                                                                                          500M
         I      I
       400W
    LEGEND


    Contour Interval = 1000 Gammas

    5 = 55000

    6 = 56000


    7 = 57000

    8 = 58000


     ETC.
FIGURE 2
TOTAL MAGNETIC FIELD INTENSITY
G & H LANDFILL

-------
                             %
                              \
                                      K •:,-j
                                  \\    *V5-
                 ;»° ° *
1000H"
     <£%
 500N

























/
//
/
D
O
Or
\ 6
8
&
O
O
O
*
1 * «a
; :/
,' o\
\ :\
i\
:!
9 i
* i
» i
:i
•/ 1
:i i
:!l
«i t
*n
•i
:n
:\
: i
• i
: i
o


i j
i/
5 S
i
? '
it
i i
« i
1
i
i
I
i
I
t
*
i
1
/
>










         §118

       400W







     LEGEND




          CONTOUR INTERVAL:




     	  75 MILUMHOS / METER




     	100 MILLIMHOS / METER




              NEGATIVE CONDUCTIVITY
                                                                                                                                               2000E

                                                                                                                                    0     i      8
                                                                                                                                                                           -SOON
                                                                                                                                                                    FIGURE 3


                                                                                                                                                                    GROUND CONDUCTIVITY

                                                                                                                                                                    G & H LANDFILL

-------
1000N"
               >•"•-..
                         'X
                 X.20
 5QON-
            »
            o
            o
             S
             *
              *
              «
              «
               «
                        0
        400W
 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10 parts per thousand of the primary field
                                                                                   o
v-&
^























e
o
#
*
$•
d
G
•/
:i
.*
ii
;i
:i.
:t
•/ 1
:i i
:i i
* 8
«! I
:n
*i i
:n
: »
: t
: \
• i
: i
•
»
li
H
it
i i
'I
i
§
§
i
1
i
I
1
/
r























«
o
c
«
0 *













                                           O
                                                                                                                                                                                      SOON
                                                                                                                                                                             FIGURE 4
                                                                                                                                                                             IN-PHASE EM RESPONSE
                                                                                                                                                                             G & H LANDFILL

-------
10GON
SOON-
                                                                                                                                                                         -SOON
     LEGEND
            EXTENT OF BURIED METAL
            BASED ON MAGNETOMETER DATA
     f	)  EXTENT OF BURIED METAL
     ^	s  BASED ON IN-PHASE EM RESPONSE

      A    ZONE IDENTIFICATION (A - Z)
                                                                                                                                                                     FIGURES
                                                                                                                                                                     INTERPRETED AREAS OF
                                                                                                                                                                     BURIED MATERIAL
                                                                                                                                                                     G & H LANDFILL

-------
                                   1 .
                 1 o « » o »
100QN-
 500N«
        i
       400W
     LEGEND
                                                                                                                                                          SOON
                   1     I
             INTERPRETED EXTENT OF BURIED METAL
                                                                                                                                         FIGURE 6
                                                                                                                                         INTERPRETED EXTENT OF
                                                                                                                                         SHALLOW BURIED METAL BASED ON
                                                                                                                                         EM CONDUCTIVITY DATA
                                                                                                                                         G & H LANDFILL

-------
                                      Table 1
                        PLANNED TEST PIT LOCATIONS
                             G&H Landfill Phase III RI
                           Technical Memorandum No. 2
Test
Pit       Geophysical
No.      Grid Location

Priority Targets

 1        520 E  1410 N


 2       1320 E   800 N

 3       1240 E  1240 N


 4       1520 E  1200 N


 5       1560 E   600 N


 6       1400 E   700 N

 7       1240 E   770 N


 8       1520 E  1030 N


 9       1680 E   750 N

10        160 E   600 N



11       2280 E   320 N

12       2320 E   170 N

13       2040 E   220 N


14       1960 E   270 N


15       1840 E   460 N

16       1040 E   880 N
                     Comments
Zone A - very strong magnetic and electromagnetic
responses

Zone H - strong magnetic and electromagnetic responses

Zone C - very strong magnetic and electromagnetic
responses; magnetic response is about 500 feet long

Zone D - strong magnetic and electromagnetic responses;
same magnetic zone as No.  3

Zone G - very strong magnetic and electromagnetic
responses

Zone G - strong magnetic and electromagnetic responses

Zone H - very strong magnetic response; strong
electromagnetic response

Zone J - very strong electromagnetic response; possibly a
N-S  "trench"

Zone K - strong magnetic and electromagnetic responses

PHASE II - landfill, Zone M - primarily a very strong
magnetic target;  the only  recommended target outside the
Phase I landfill

Strong  magnetic  response

Strong  magnetic  response of limited extent

Strong  magnetic  and electromagnetic response, but nearby
trash may be affecting results

Strong  magnetic  and electromagnetic response of limited
extent

Strong  magnetic  response of limited extent

Strong  magnetic  response of limited extent

-------
                                 Table 1 (continued)


Test
Pit       Geophysical
No.      Grid Location                             Comments

17       1120 E   800 N      Strong magnetic response

18        320 E   1300 N      Oil Pond No. 2 - strong magnetic response

19        280 E   1510 N      Oil Pond No. 2 - strong magnetic response

20        480 E   1200 N      Oil Pond No. 2 - strong magnetic response; narrow source

21       1120 E   1140 N      Strong magnetic and electromagnetic responses

22       1240 E   1400 N      Fish pond - strong magnetic response only

23        960 E   1340 N      Zone  B  - primarily a magnetic response

24       1400 E   1360 N      Fish pond - strong magnetic response only

25       1520 E   1440 N      Oil Pond No. 1 (south side) - strong magnetic response;
                              some  shallow metal

26       1680 E   1440 N      Oil Pond No. 1 (south side) - strong magnetic response

27       1640 E   1100 N      Very strong magnetic response

28       1720 E   1000 N      Strong magnetic response

29       1840 E   940 N      Strong magnetic response

30       1920 E   1180 N      Near  Zone E - strong  magnetic and electromagnetic
                              responses of limited extent

31       1920 E   1400 N      Oil Pond No. 1 - strong magnetic response

32       1760 E   630 N      Electromagnetic response high;  upgradient of oil seeps

33       1480 E   840 N      Electromagnetic response high

34       1380 E   1210 N      Strong magnetic and electromagnetic responses; center of
                              same  zone as No. 3 and  No. 4

35       1100 E   1490 N      Western end of Oil Pond No. 1 not a geophysical target
                              but shallow metal is indicated

36        480 E   1460 N      Strong magnetic and electromagnetic responses; same
                              zone as  No. 1

GLT863/056.50

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 5
November 9,  1989
GLO65561.FI.FP
Zone C.  Strong magnetic and in-phase electromagnetic anomalies were found on all lines
from 1200 E to 1360 E. The anomalies were generally between 1200 N and  1280 N.
Although the in-phase response was high, the measured conductivities were not.  This can
happen under very conductive conditions. Zone C is within 100 feet of the south side of
the fish pond as shown in the work plan.

Zone D.  Zone  D consists of elevated in-phase electromagnetic and corresponding
magnetic anomalies on lines 1480 E and 1520 E. The magnetic anomalies of Zones D
and C  are part  of an extensive magnetic zone. The  response is not as continuous as the
magnetics; this is reflected by the creation of separate  zones.  Zone D is also within
100 feet of the  south side of the fish pond.

Zone E.  The in-phase response seen on lines 1920 E and  1960 E was narrower than the
corresponding magnetic anomalies.  The response indicates a relatively small, discrete
target within the more extensive magnetic anomaly.

Zone F.  The magnetic anomaly was equally  strong from lines 2040 E to 2160 E. The
in-phase response was strongest on line 2040, where  there was  a corresponding
conductivity anomaly.  The other lines in the zone did  not  have corresponding conductivity
anomalies, although there are in-phase highs.

Zone G.  Both electromagnetic and in-phase  electromagnetic anomalous areas cover
irregularly shaped areas and do not appear to define a disposal area of specific form (such
as a trench or filled pond). Zone G may represent  multiple dumping episodes.  The
anomalies in Zone G  are some of the strongest at the site.  The in-phase response  extends
for about 300 feet, and the magnetic source area extends about 1,000 feet.

Zone H.  The magnetic response of Zone H  connects with the magnetic response, as in
Zone G.  The in-phase of Zone H is associated with a separate arm of the interpreted
source  area of the larger magnetic area.

Zone I. Anomalous in-phase  electromagnetic responses are evident on lines 2040 E to
2280 E.  Shallow buried metal and surface metal may  be interfering with the in-phase
responses.  The corresponding magnetic anomaly is broader than the in-phase
electromagnetic response.

Zones  with In-Phase Anomalies Only

Zone J. The strongest in-phase response was seen on line 1520 E,  from 820 N to 1060 N.
The measurements on  this line were among the strongest measured at the site.
Anomalous electromagnetic responses were also seen on adjacent lines, but they were not
as strong.   No discrete magnetic anomaly is associated with Zone J.  The magnetic
anomalies within Zone J cannot be correlated between lines.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 6
November 9,  1989
GLO65561.FI.FP
Zone K.  Zone K is defined by anomalous in-phase responses on lines 1640 E and 1680 E
between 700 N and 760 N.  No well-defined magnetic anomaly covers both lines; however,
a relatively weak magnetic anomaly was present on line 1640 E.

Zone L.  Zone L is east of Zone E.  Both zones appear to be in line with each other.
The in-phase response was  strongest on lines 2080 E and 2120 E.  On both lines, the
in-phase was anomalous only at a single station.  There was no apparent corresponding
magnetic anomaly.

PREVIOUS FINDINGS

Zone A.  No previous work was done in this area.

Zone B.  No previous test was done in this area.

Zone C.  Boring RL-6 is near the west end of Zone C, but not within either the magnetic
or electromagnetic source areas.  No metal or oil contamination was noted, and no test
pits were located nearby.

Zone D.  No previous work was done in this area.

Zone E.  Boring RW-5,  about 50 feet west of Zone E, encountered oily soils at a depth of
15 to  18.5 feet. Test pits in the magnetic source area corresponding to Zone E
encountered metal, including drums.  The western  end of the magnetic anomaly has not
been investigated.  The  closest test pit to  Zone E is TP-5, about 50 feet to the northeast,
where sheet metal was  encountered but no drums.

Zone F.  Test pit  TP-28 is at the edge of Zone F. Five drums were encountered at  a
depth of 6 to  10 feet.

Zone G.  Within Zone  G, test pit TP-11 encountered eight drums  at a depth of 6 feet.
Test pit TP-12, less than 20 feet outside the zone, encountered no metal but did encounter
leachate at 12 feet.  TP-13, also less than 20 feet outside the zone, encountered no metal.
Boring RD-8XX is near Zone G and encountered  oily material at about 3 feet, but no
metal.

Zone H.  No metal was noted in boring RL-9, located at the west end of  this zone.  No
metal was noted in  test pit  TP-14, about 40 feet south of Zone H.  Additional test pits
were excavated within the magnetic source area that encompasses both  Zones G and H.
TP-10 encountered a drum  at 10 feet. TP-9 reported no metal.

Zone I. Test  pit TP-8  is located within Zone I.  Ten  drums were  found at a depth of
10 feet.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 7
November 9,  1989
GL065561.FI.FP
Zone J. No test pits were excavated within Zone J.

Zone K.  No test pits or borings have been performed within this zone.  A surface soil
sample from here contained 860 ppb of PCBs.

Zone L.  Test pit TP-17, in the vicinity of Zone L, encountered no metal.

PHASE n LANDFILL

No previous sampling was  done near Zones M and N to indicate the nature of the
sources.

Zone M. Zone M is the only distinct in-phase  anomaly in Landfill II. It is evident on line
120 E from 660 N to 720 N, and on line 160 E from 620 N to 700 N.  The zone is on the
north side of the source area of a large magnetic anomaly that extends about 200 feet east
of the in-phase anomaly.

Zone N.  Zone N is defined only by magnetic anomalies.  The source area for the
magnetic anomalies extends from 480 E to 720 E. The magnetic anomalies are not strong
relative to others at the site, but correlate well between lines.

PHASE IH LANDFILL

No in-phase anomalies  define zones that can be seen across two or more lines. The
anomalies observed on  only one line are not considered significant.

The magnetic data in Zones  P and Q do not clearly define any discrete  areas of buried
metal.  The high values measured on lines 400 W to 280 W may be due to edge effect.
The south edge of a magnetic source area will cause a positive anomaly. Since these highs
are located at the south edge of the landfill, the highs may be attributable to the  metal
scattered throughout the fill or to  a localized area within the landfill.

The shallow metal, indicated by the electromagnetic conductivity, corresponds to the
location of the interpreted magnetic source area and may be related to the same  feature.

No sampling was done  previously near these zones to indicate the nature of the sources.


GLT863/007.50

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 3	AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:     Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         John Heinicke/GLO

DATE:      September 11, 1989

SUBJECT:  Test Pit and Source Testing Investigation
            G&H Landfill Phase III RI

PROJECT:  GLO65561.FI.FT


                                INTRODUCTION


A test pit investigation at the G&H Landfill site in Shelby Township, Michigan, was
performed between May 15 and 26, 1989.  This memorandum presents the following data
generated by the investigation:

       •     Ground surface elevations and horizontal coordinates of test pit locations

       •     Test pit logs for each test pit excavation

       •     A list of samples collected from test pits for analytical  testing (for analytical
            results see Technical Memorandum No. 10)


                            PURPOSE AND SCOPE


The work was conducted:

       •     To define discrete areas or volumes, if possible, of source materials within
            the Phase I Landfill (primarily, suspected drum burial areas)

       •     To obtain chemical  information to characterize existing and potential future
            releases from landfill sources to groundwater for evaluation of containment,
            treatment,  and destruction alternatives

The investigation fulfilled the scope of activities described for Task FI, Subtask FT~Source
Testing, Test Pits of the G&H Landfill Phase III RI/FS Work Plan (November 18, 1988).
The scope of completed work consists of:

       •     Excavating and logging 36 test pits

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 3                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 2
September 11, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FT
      •     Collecting, packing, and shipping 45 samples of landfill source materials
            (including 6 duplicates and 2 high hazard samples) for analytical testing

      •     Analysis and onsite screening of landfill source materials by a close support
            laboratory (CSL)


                     FIELD ACTIVITIES AND METHODS


PERSONNEL AND VISITORS

The following team members were onsite during all  or part of the test pit investigation:

  Team Member                 Affiliation                  Responsibility

Dean Charpentier              CH2M HILL            Chemist
Don Johnson                  CH2M HILL            Logger/Sampler
Ike Johnson                   CH2M HILL            Logger/SSO
Cathy Kantowski               CH2M HILL            Sampler
Jeff Lament                   CH2M HILL            Logger/Sampler
Bryan Laude                  CH2M HILL            Sampler/Air Monitoring
Angelo Liberatore              CH2M HILL            SSO
Anne Stumpf                  CH2M HILL            Sampler/SSO
Kathy Warren                  CH2M HILL            Sampler
Jan Williams                  CH2M HILL            Sampler/Chemist
James Padden                  Maecorp                 Foreman/Operator
David Ris                     Maecorp                 Laborer
Dennis Smith                  Maecorp                 Operator

Kevin Adler of the U.S. EPA was onsite to observe  test pit  excavation and sampling
procedures.  Glen Turchan and Dave Cushman of Connestoga-Rovers and Associates were
onsite daily as representatives of the PRPs to observe test pit activities.

TEST PIT LOCATIONS

Test pit locations were selected on the basis of the results of the Phase III RI geophysical
investigation conducted in November 1988 (see Technical Memorandum No.  1) and on
data collected during RI Phases I and II.  Test pit locations were marked in  the field
according to the grid established during the Phase III RI geophysical investigation.
The locations of test pit excavations are shown in Figure 1.  Ground surface  elevations and
horizontal coordinates for the test pits are listed in Table  1.

-------
to
K
a.
t-
a>
S
o
                                                                                                     RSS5DSHTIALARSA
                                                              - *
                                                                                                                   23 -
DTP36

  ^TP01
XNP TP20
                                                                         D
                               Q TP35    -A

                            Or         TP22

                                       D


                            TP23         TP24D
                                                                               D
                                                                                               D      D
                                                                                               TP25
                                                                                                       TP26
                                                                                                            TP31
                            D
                                                                        .... ^,,- --q.
                                                                                                             TP30
                                                                                                                D
                                                                                 TP21
                TP27

                D
                                                                s:;  ••  DISPOSAL

                                                                I ''].      YARD
                                                               •••;.: ...•'••. ^
                            PHASE m
                            LAMDFiLL
          I: TP16

          ;; D
                                               TP10

                                                  D
>*••,„, V x;%«    TP17



   "X/, " ^*°   DTP07

       '"*'•:•,.    '"••-. ":'-<-;
                                                                                              ,TP33
                    PHASE i LANDHLL

                    D TP28

                         D
                        TP29
                  TP09

                  0
                                                                                                        TP32 D
                                                                                                    TP05
                                                     PHASE H LAMOFfLL
                         QTP15   |
                         x"
                                                                        OJL
                                                                                                        ^-x.:-:^ n
                                                                                                    ^•^•x><>x>*^ / "^
                                                                                                                  TP14
   .• ••.  **  x"5?V"V"v<<;>''''"—  ~*'?"V'i. '^ ••'  v;f'f                •"'" :
    X  / ifV*"* •**•        '•>•/%>-  ""-^ ••-  • •>  ~~        TD-4O  •••" •
  /,/   g~    	,-v^>^:v>x'^aTP13    TP^  |7

""*<—>•£%     /    'A-^*\^t\iv  *>**,     ^  ti
     M    /     w^^;^.     -d
                                                                                       ^j   / 'x-:
                                                                                     &&ir—J
                                                                                                                                 -..  >:,-:	 i,^ •'
                                                                                                                                  •v.. ,  vv^ .:..:•-.. -••• — ;
                                                                                                                                         /,. \
                                                                                                                                          "X.  Xx    II
                                                                                                                                            '^-^Jl

                                                                                                                                                      0>:
                                                   \.
                                                       \
                \
                                                                                          North
                                                                                                              t
                                                                                                                                                                                     300
                                                                                                                     APPROXIMATE

                                                                                                                     SCALE IN FEET
                                                                                                               LEGEND



                                                                                                           444SS!:i!SS*Sft4444:¥¥* LANDFILL BOUNDARY




                                                                                                           x	x	x	x U.S. EPA SITE FENCE




                                                                                                                 H        GATE




                                                                                                                         DITCH, STREAM. OR

                                                                                                          --""•••-,.-•-"	"  RIVER




                                                                                                            :.;••	, ,.:: ;:;: ;•.   TRAIL




                                                                                                                         RAILROAD GRADE

                                                                                                                      "'•  (TRACKS REMOVED)




                                                                                                                         TEST PIT (1989)
                                                                                         FIGURE 1

                                                                                         TEST PIT LOCATIONS

                                                                                         G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl

                                                                                         TECH. MEMO. NO. 3

-------
                          Table 1
               GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS
        AND HORIZONTAL COORDINATES OF TEST PITS
                   G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
                 Technical Memorandum No. 3
Test Pit
Designation
TP01
TP02
TP03
TP04
TP05
TP06
TP07
TP08
TP09
TP10
TP11
TP12
TP13
TP14
TP15
TP16
TP17
TP18
TP19
TP20
TP21
TP22
TP23
TP24
TP25
TP26
TP27
TP28
TP29
TP30
TP31
TP32
TP33
TP34
TP35
TP36
Ground Surface
Elevation (a)
709.5
706.8
707.5
707.3
704.5
705.5
706.3
706.5
706.2
706.0
701.0
699.0
702.5
700.9
704.2
707.0
705.5
705.2
709.0
704.5
708.1
705.4
707.8
705.7
705.5
704.8
707.2
706.1
707.2
706.9
706.0
705.5
706.8
707.3
705.2
709.8
Horizontal Coordinates (b)
Northing
50,630
50,020
50,460
50,240
49,810
49,920
49,990
50,250
49,960
50,000
49,540
49,380
49,440
49,480
49,680
50,100
50,020
50,520
50,730
50,430
50,360
50,620
50,550
50,580
50,660
50,660
50,320
50,220
50,160
50,400
50,620
49,960
50,060
50,410
50,710
50,680
Easting
24,590
25,380
25,300
25,580
25,620
25,460
25,300
25,580
25,740
24,430
26,340
29,380
26,110
26,020
25,900
25,100
25,180
24,390
24,350
24,550
25,180
25,310
25,020
25,460
25,580
25,750
25,700
25,780
25,900
25,980
25,980
25,830
25,540
25,440
25,160
24,550
(a)  Elevations based on USGS datum.
(b)  Horizontal coordinates based on site aerial map (Abrams 1983).

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 3                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 3
September 11, 1989
GL065561.FI.FT
Horizontal coordinates were obtained by plotting the Phase III RI geophysical grid and the
test pit locations onto the site aerial  map (Abrams 1983).  The coordinates were then read
directly from the aerial map and are considered to be  accurate within the range of
±10 feet.  Ground surface elevations were interpolated from the  elevation contours on the
aerial map and are  considered to be accurate within the range of ±0.5 foot.

EXCAVATION PROCEDURES

Test pits were excavated using a Komatsu PC 220 LC  track-mounted backhoe.  The
backhoe  and a front-end loader were used to backfill the test pits.  The equipment, two
operators, and helper were provided by Maecorp, Inc., an environmental services firm
subcontracted by Mateco Drilling Company of Grand Rapids. Test pits were logged by a
CH2M HILL geotechnical engineer,  hydrogeologist, or geologist.

Excavation and backfilling were conducted under Level B health and safety protection.
Air in the breathing zone and in the test pits was monitored continuously using an HNu
photoionization device, an explosimeter/oxygen meter, and a monitox cyanide detector.
Hazardous readings of organic vapors and explosive gases were measured and are
recorded on the test pit logs. No hazardous readings of oxygen depletion or cyanide were
detected.

Test pits were excavated in approximate 12-inch passes.  Uniform passes were difficult
because of the heterogeneity of the waste  material.  Excavated material was stockpiled on
a layer of 6-mil polyethylene placed on the ground next to the test  pit.  No  intact drums
were removed from the test pits.

After logging and sampling,  each pit was backfilled using the backhoe and front-end
loader.  Excavated materials were replaced to roughly  the same location of the pit from
which they were removed.  The backhoe bucket was used to compact material returned to
the pit.   Equipment was steam cleaned after excavating at each location. A 1-foot thick
layer of imported clay was placed over each test pit area at the completion  of the test pit
investigation.

SAMPLING PROCEDURES

Samples of landfill source materials were collected following the procedures  outlined in the
Quality  Assurance Project Plan dated (September 30, 1988). Samples were  collected for:

      •      Analytical screening at  a close support laboratory (CSL)
      •      Analytical testing at an EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) laboratory

Site personnel made no attempt to enter the  test  pits.   Upon bringing a backhoe bucket of
landfill waste to the surface, the material was screened with an HNu to determine the

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 3                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 4
September 11, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FT
presence of organic constituents.  Samples were taken directly from the bucket and placed
into labeled glass jars.

                           TECHNICAL RESULTS
TEST PIT LOGS

Thirty-six test pit logs are presented in Attachment 1.  A summary of the test pit data is
given in Table 2. Table 2 also indicates whether drums  or oil were encountered at the
test pit.

SAMPLES FOR ANALYTICAL TESTING

Table 3 summarizes the landfill source material samples  that were collected for onsite
screening by the CSL and for analytical testing by a CLP laboratory (see Technical
Memorandum No. 10 for analytical results).


GLT863/062.50

-------
            Table 2
SUMMARY OF TEST PIT EXCAVATIONS
      G&H Landfill Phase II! Rl
    Technical Memorandum No. 3
Test Pit
Designation
TP01
TP02
TP03
TP04
TP05
TP06
TP07
TP08
TP09
TP10
TP11
TP12
TP13
TP14
TP15
TP16
TP17
TP18
TP19
TP20
TP21
TP22
TP23
TP24
TP25
TP26
TP27
TP28
TP29
TP30
TP31
TP32
TP33
TP34
TP35
TP36
Excavation
Date
05-19-89
05-16-89
05-1 5-89
05-15-89
05-17-89
05-16-89
05-16-89
05-16-89
05-17-89
05-25-89
05-17-89
05-17-89
05-18-89
05-18-89
05-17-89
05-18-89
05-18-89
05-19-89
05-19-89
05-22-89
05-22-89
05-23-89
05-23-89
05-23-89
05-23-89
05-24-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-23-89
05-24-89
05-22-89
Total Depth
of Test Pit
(ft)
6
18
8
16
15
18
15
18
16
18
14
13
18
12
16
15
16
16
22
18
16
18
15
18
16
11
10
12
16
12
9
20
12
10
12
20
Cover
Thickness
(ft)
0.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.0
Waste
Thickness
(ft)
>5.5
8.0
5.5
12.0
12.0
13.5
12.0
13.0
15.0
13.0
>12.5
11.0
15.0
XI1.5
10.5
12.0
12.0
13.5
14.5
13.0
13.0
13.5
12.0
12.5
11.0
7.0
7.0
9.0
12.0
5.5
4.5
16.5
8.5
9.0
7.0
17.0
Drums
Encountered
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Oil
Encountered
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes .
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No

-------
                                            (Page 1 of 2)
              Table 3
SUMMARY OF LANDFILL SOURCE SAMPLES
FOR ANALYTICAL SCREENING AND TESTING
        G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
      Technical Memorandum No. 3
Test Pit
Designation
TP01
TP02
TP03
TP04
TP05
TP06
TP07
TP08
TP09
TP10
TP11
TP12
TP13
TP14
TP15
TP16
TP17
TP18
TP19
TP20
TP21
TP22
TP23
TP24
TP25
TP26
TP27
TP28
TP29
Sample
Designation
GH-TP01-01
GH-TP02-01
GH-FRTP02-01
GH-TP02-02
GH-TP03-01
GH-TP04-01
GH-TP04-02
GH-TP05-01
GH-TP06-01
GH-TP07-01
GH-TP08-01
GH-FRTP08-01
GH-TP09-01
GH-TP10-01
GH-TP11-01
GH-TP12-01
GH-TP13-01
GH-FRTP13-01
GH-TP14-01
GH-TP15-01
GH-TP16-01
GH-TP17-01
GH-TP18-01
GH-TP19-01
GH-TP20-01
GH-TP21-01
GH-TP22-01
GH-TP23-01
GH-TP24-01
GH-TP25-01
GH-FRTP25-01
GH-TP26-01HH
GH-TP26-01
GH-TP27-01
GH-FRTP27-01
GH-TP28-01
GH-TP29-01
Depth of
Sample
(ft)
4-6
10-12
10-12
12-14
6-8
2-4
14-16
12-14
15-17
13-15
11 -13
11 - 13
12- 14
16-18
9-11
11 -13
12- 14
12- 14
7-9
11 - 13
13-15
14- 16
13-15
15- 17
16-18
14- 16
16-18
13-15
15-17
13-15
13-15
9- 11
8- 10
8- 10
10- 12
14- 15
CLP (a)
VGA
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BNA
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PEST/
PCB
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Metals
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Oil&
Grease
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dioxin/
Furan
X
X
X




X
X









X
X

X



X
X

X

Incineration
Parameters (b)
X




X

X
X
X

X



X














CSL (c)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

-------
                                       Table 3
                     SUMMARY OF LANDFILL SOURCE SAMPLES
                     FOR ANALYTICAL SCREENING AND TESTING
                               G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
                             Technical Memorandum No. 3
                                                                             (Page 2 of 2)
Test Pit
Designation
TP30
TP31
TP32
TP33
TP35
TP36
Sample
Designation
GH-TP30-01
GH-TP31-01
GH-TP32-01
GH-TP33-01
GH-TP33-01HH
GH-TP35-01
GH-TP36-01
GH-FRTP36-01
Depth of
Sample
(ft)
9-11
7-9
18-20
10-12
10-12
18-20
18-20
CLP (a)
VGA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BNA
X
X
X
X
X
X
PEST/
PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Oil&
Grease
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dioxin/
Furan
X
X

X
X
X
X
Incineration
Parameters (b)






CSL (c)
X
X
X
X
X
X
(a) CLP designates a U.S. EPA contract laboratory program laboratory.
(b) Incineration parameters inlcude: Btu, % ash, % moisture, % volatile solids, and fixed carbon.
(c) CSL designates a close support laboratory.

-------
                    Technical Memorandum No. 3

                           Attachment 1
                         TEST PIT LOGS
GLT863/053.50

-------

DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
0
1 -
2. -
3 -
4_
5 -
~
SAMPLE
1
4
&>

I|




PROJECT NUMBER TEST PIT NUMBER
Gl_o k554> 1. FI.FT TPO| SHEET 1 OF 1
TEST PIT WALL LOG
PROJECT G| £ H LAMDFlUU IOCATION PHASE, t LAWfcFiU- MAPDpNW WAI 1 OF PIT
PIPVATION APPR-0* . Toq.S FT. nnMTRAr.Tno MATECO / MAE-COfLf nATC Pyr 41/ATCn 5/11181
WATFR 1 FVFI AMR RATF APP&.OV , 4-5 F T. FXnAVATION MFTHnn KoMATSU PC ZZOUC IORRFR 3"- LAMOfJT
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH 15 FT. WIDTH 5 FT. nPPTM 6 FT. ppuARKfi

y I I I i I I I i \ I I I I I <_t I I I I I I i I I I
"W^' ^ JyhK^J^ ^ '^_1(L_J-J ' ""**' ^ • •
\^77]^^^^ ° cuAftVitd A«d
' LEU- 1.%
. f
dark qtefivi ^loi.'Vlvvl p*{javvO
, •& • L V
. LEL = 55%
• I-W •- 35o f p-n
• Siop e^cavaiind Jue. ta
hlaV\ LEV. Avid niiu »W<1(>M5.
• ' • , 0
FORM \ Tnt Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                         PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                             TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                              TP02.
                                                                                                                      SHEET    /   OF  /
                                                                                              TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
           SAMPLE
          a
               1
PROJECT.
                               G<  H
LOCATION_QiAjS£_T__
                     ELEVATION.
                                A Pf PJO X .   T 0 
-------
                                                                        PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                        G,UO &5S4.L FX. FT
                                                              TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                TP03
                                                                                  SHEET
                           OF  /
                                                                                             TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BE
SURFACE (
           SAMPLE
                     PROJECT
M  LA>JDF]1_V_
                                                                            lonATioM   PHASE I,  LAtJPFlt-U
                     ELEVATION.
                                         10-7.5  FT-
                     WATER LEVELAND DATE NOT
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH   -20 FT.
                            muTPArrnp  hATE-Co/ MAE£op.P
                            EXCAVATION MPTHOn  KoMATSO  PC
                            WIQTH  ^ FT.   DEPTH   & FT-   REMARKS
               MAP OF_§£=_ WALL OF PIT
                    6/ /-S / •??
    LOGGER.
   5  -
   10 -
                      i   i    i
                                                    i
i    i
                                                                                                               -• at
                      i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—rn—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—r
                                                        LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                                     COMMENTS
                                                                                                                              Sail co\»e.
                                                                                                                   HCK) -
                                                                                                                   C5L

                                                                                                                                  Cup.
FORM V Tost Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                         TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                           TP04-
                                                                                                                 SHEET   I   OF
                                                                                          TEST PIT WALL LOG
IE
£ui
  Q.OC
  UO
  QM
           SAMPLE
                    PROJECT  g 4 H LAMPFH-U
                                                                PHASE.  I  LAMDFIU-
                                                                                             UAPOP
                                                                                                        WALL OF PIT
         APP£0*.   lQ7,3 FT.	 rr.MTQAr.Tnp   MATECo / MA£O>RP

WATER LEVEL AND OATF   APPP-QX.  15  FT-    EXCAVATION MFTHnn  KoMAT^U  P

APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH   l6 ^T-    yVIDTH	§_fL_ DEPTH	L^±Ii_ REMARKS.
                                                                                                      DATE EXCAVATED	5 I ISI
                                                     I   I    I   I	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
FORM \ Tost Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                      PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                       G\U> &55&I. FL.FT
                                                                          TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                            TPo5
                                                         SHEET  1    OF
                                                                                           TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BE
SURFACE (
           SAMPLE
         1
PROJECT   5 £ H
                                                                          incATinM   PHAS&Z
                                                                                                                  MAP OP
                                          .  5  FT.
ELEVATION.

WATER LEVELAND DATE APPPQ*. ll  FT.

APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH  ' <° ?
                                                               >//7/39
                                                                                                                             WAI i OP PIT
    EXCAVATION uprunn   KoMATso  PC, ^^O L(L

           <° ^    DEPTH__iU
.LOGGER.
                                                                                          PPMARKS
I   r   I   >r   I   J
   5  -
   lo  -
         IZ.
         /f
   15  -
                                                                              1   1    1
                                                                       1   1   1   1
                                                                             - stained
                                                                                        --  ftnn=  2 to 5
                                                                                            L&L *  3 -k 7 %
                     1	1	1	1	1	1	T
                                 —I	1	1	T

                                  LENGTH (FT)
                    T	1	T
                                                                                                                  COMMENTS
                                                                                           **  II'.

                                                                                           Jnn-  s<
                                                                                        -• Leu-  5 K'  io
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                        PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                                        . FT
                                                                                 TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                                      SHEET    I  OF I
                                                                                             TEST PIT WALL LOG
II
ffly
  O.OC
  UI3
  oat
           SAMPLE
          I
&
                     PROJECT
                                H
                                                             IOCATION   PHASEL  I.  IMPFILI.
                                                                                                                     MAPOJ=
                                                                                                                           KM
PIFVATIOM  APPELo*.  105.5   FT

                              IZ  FT.
                                                              mKiTPAr.-rnp
                                                            EYp.M/AT.nKiuPTnnn  koMATSO
APPROXIPKATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH
                                                     FT.     WIDTH
                                                               DEPTH  '& FT- _ REMARKS
                                                                                           DATE EXCAVATED

                                                                                           LOQGER _ J.
  5   -
          15
          n
  1C.
                      T   I
                                                                            I   I
                                                                                                   I    I   I
                                               I    I    I   I    I   I



                                                        LENGTH (FT)
                                                                    I    I   I    I    I   I    I   I
                                                                                                                     COMMENTS
                                                                                                                             12.
                                                                                                                  Hno s
                                                                                                                                      .V
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                                 time*,
FORM \ Test Pi! Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                         GL-0 £55 4, J .FI.FT
                                                                           TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                             TPol
                                                      SHEET    /  OF  /
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
           SAMPLE
               II
PROJECT   5 J H  LAlJDFtLl-
FIPVATIOM  APPE-Oll.
                                                 FT
                     WATER LEVELAND PATE  K)oT
           _ i nr.ATifw  PH-*S£ j: J-AtJPF/Ll.	 UAPOP  ^  WALL OF PIT
            MATZto/MA&ozP	DATE EXCAVATED	51
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH    Ib FT.   WIDTH
EXCAVATION MFTHon  fotfATSO  PC 2ZQ Ld   LOGGER.
            ^_ HFPTH   IS FT  REMARKS.
FORM \ Tost Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/B9

-------
                                                                        PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                                    . FJ.fr
                                         TEST PIT NUMBER
                                          TPoe>
                                     SHEET   /   OF   I
                                                                                              TEST PIT WALL LOG
  Ul
  oo
  O.OC
  IU3
  GOT
           SAMPLE
          i
                                                             UAPOF M\A/  WALL OF PIT
ELEVATION  ApPe.oV
                                                 FT
WATER LEVEL AND HATE  APPE.0*.  7.5 FT

APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH  3.O  FT
      CONTRACTOR _
                          DATE EXCAVATED
      EXCAVATION METHOD

      WIDTH _ 5 FT _ DEPTH
            P(LZ2O Z-C    LOGGER
        FT   REMARKS.
  /«>  H
         /3
  is  H
   2-0
                                       I
                                                                                                      I    I
                                                                                                                   L£L- 0

                                                                                                                + //wo = O
                                         I   I    I
  I    I    I.   I    I


LENGTH (FT)
I    I
                                                                                                                      COMMENTS
                                                                                                                       10 .
                                        2.0
                                                                   PP»I( pe
                                                                                                                      - 0 «f a.//
FORM \ Tmt PH Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                       GLOb55t>l. FI.FT
                                                                                TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                  TpO?
                                                                                              SHEET   /  OF   /
                                                                                           TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BE
SURFACE
           SAMPLE
          1
II
                     PROJECT
                                    LAHDFlLL
WATER LEVELAND DATE—	
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH_££
           _ inftATinM   PHASE- I- LAWFILL
            MA-TSCO/ /^ftECOK.P	
EXCAVATION UFTHnn  KOMATSU  PC220  LC
                                                                                                    UAPOF ^   WALL OF PIT
                                                                                                  X./;.
                                                             WIDTH
                                                              DEPTH.
                             .REMARKS.
FORM \ Tost Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                           TEST PIT NUMBER



                                                                              TP/0
                                                                                                                    SHEET   /  OF  /
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
9l
Ulm
eng
  IU3
  am
SAMPLE
                     PROJECT
                                                                                             3E
                                                                                               MAP OF
                                                                                                                               WALL OF PIT
                       70fc.o
                                                              nnuTRAnnnp
                                                                                     MA&2OK.P
                                                                                                         DATE EXCAVATED
                     WATER LEVELAND DATE
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH
                                                  i UFTHnn  ^0/^/47*50  PC22Q


                                         WIDTH ' 6 /=r.   pgpTH  /^ ^T   RFMARKS
   5  -
  /o  -
   2.0
                          I   i   i    i   T   i   T   i   i
                              SIUT     . brouow  wo     »pprK
                                                                        T   I    I   I    \
                                                                                                              . . L£.L- 0


                                                                                                                 rmo5  I
           T	1	1	T
                                                                       T	1	1	T
                                                                                               COMMENTS
                                                                                                                    " o
                                                       LENGTH (FT)
FORM \ Tnt Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                        G,LO
                                                                                 TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                   TPH
SHEET  I    OF
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
           SAMPLE
          •3
          I
II
                     PROJECT  5 < tf LA»DF)Ll.
                                                                           inr.ATinM
                                         7o/
                                                                                                        DATE EXCAVATED
                                                                                                     MAP OF  Nl   WALL OF PIT
                                                                                                          5/1
      WATER LEVELAND DATE
                                .  IP  FT-
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH   'SFT.     yuinjH   5 FT    OFPTH 1^ FT.   REMARKS

        - 1 — I - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 — I - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1
                                                                    I — I — I — I - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 -
FORM \ Tost Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                        GjU-0 kS54U Fi-FT
                                                                           TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                            TP 12-
                                                                                         SHEET    '  OF
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
  Q.E
  IU3
  on
           SAMPLE
               1
               &
                     PROJECT
                                  H  LAK)E>FILL
                                                      LOCATION.
                                                                 PHASE.  3.  LAMbFU-l
                                                                                         MAP OF
                           WALL OF PIT
FlPV/ATinM  APPEQ*.  (^.Q   FT	 rr.MTPAr.Tna  MATECo / MA£O>E.P	DATE EXCAVATED	S) n/


WATER LEVELAND OATF   APP^o-<.  fe  FT.	 EXCAVATION MPTHnn  kToMATSU  P<2^2o LC-	LOGGER	Z


APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH   l5  FT-    WIDTH	L-EL-DEPTH	H-fll. REMARKS	
  /o  -
   15 -
I
                TTT
                                                  I    FTI ,  1
                                                        \i«Mu +
i    i   i    r   I    i
i   i
                     T	1	1	1	1	1	1—I	1	1—I	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	\	1	1	1	1	T


                                                       LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                               COMMENTS



                                                                                            LEL-- 3%

                                                                                                  O -(D '
                                                                                            ot  pvT ^


                                                                                            LEL--  2

                                                                                               j:  5
                                                                                                                            fp1""1
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                        PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                          G,LO feSSkl. FI.FT
                                                                            TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                              rp 13
SHEET   /  OF   /
                                                                                              TEST PIT WALL LOG

  Bg
  Q.OC
  1113
  O0>
           SAMPLE
                     PROJECT
           ^H-  L-AMPFIUL. _ inr.ATinM   P/WS£ X  t-A*lpF>LL _ MAPOF_*L_ WALL OF PIT

FIFVATIOM  APPtLQ*.  ^102.5  FT. _ rr.MTDAr.TnQ  MATECO/ MA£
-------
                                                                     PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                           fcS5fal.FI.FT
                                                                         TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                           TP 14
SHEET
                                                                                                                 OF
                                                                                         TEST PIT WALL LOG
  CD(j
  D.OC
  IU3
  QM
          SAMPLE
!
                    PROJECT
                                                                                          X  LAMDPiuL.
                                                                                            MAP OF  W   WALL OF PIT
                             FT-
                                                                       M*T£CQ / MA E£O£P
                                                                                                     DATE EXCAVATED
                   APPgJ>J
                                                    FT      F*r.A\/ATinM UFTHnn  koPAATSQ  PCZZOLC   inoftPB
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH    Zo  FT.  umnju   5 FT.  nFPTH  /I FT-  RFUAHKS
  15  -
                                                                                          T   I   I    I   I
                                                                                                           .. One eUd  " 1



                                                                                                                         o.-V A I1
                     T—I	1	1	1	1	1—I	1	\	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	T

                                                      LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                                COMMENTS
                                                                                                              HOT- 0
FORM \ Tost Pit Log For J.H.

-------
                                                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                      CjLO 6554,1, FI-FT
                                                                                   TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                    TPI51
                                                                                  SHEET   '   OF  /
                                                                                          TEST PIT WALL LOG
  It
  am
SAMPLE
         I
          PROJECT
                         i*»I>FH-L
                                                               inr.AT.nM
                                                                                                      UAPOF      WA,,r.pp,T
APf&iX   104. Z.   FT.       rnMTPAfyrnp    MATE&)/WAE&>e.P
          	 EXCAVATION METHOD .^M*I^L_££
                                                                                            DATE EXCAVATED	H/-
          WATER LEVELAND DATE	
          APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH.
                                                       FT-   wirvru   10 FT-  DEPTH	lb ^-  REMARKS.
                                                                                                     X.//.
           I    Y   I
  10  -
  15  -
                                                                                           I    I
                                                                                                            -' LEU--
                             i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—r
                                                      LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                                 COMMENTS
                                                                                                                          rr
                                                                                                                    O -to 1
                                                                                                                          ff
                                                                                                              LEtr
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                         PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                          GU) (.SS6.1.FI. FT
                                                                                        TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                         TPKp
                                                                                                  SHEET
                                                                   OF
                                                                                               TEST PIT WALL LOG
  ui
  cog
  D.E
  UI3
  ocn
           SAMPLE
1
               &
                     PROJECT   5 i
                                                                             inr.ATir>M
                                                                                                             MAPOF_W_ WALL OF PIT
ELEVATION.
WATER LEVEL AND DATE JM
                                                 FT.
CONTRACTOR.
EXCAVATION MFTHnn   KoMATSO
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH    /&  f-T-   WIDTH	^  FT.  RFPTH  Is  ?T.  RFMAHKS
                                       _ DATE EXCAVATED	5/ '8 /
                              2.1.0 LC _ LOGGER.
  5  -
         13,
  15
         IS
             I    I  pi-   I.   I.I.I   I
                 ,  -\~\v\e -h>
                                                    T  ,1   ITT
                                                       n  mooi
i    r  T
                               " -f-i^S. Vmei.j qr^
                               «•*! H mov-iV  J-
                                                                   I    T
                                    I    I
                      T	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	T
                                                         LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                  COMMENTS
                                                                                                                        = 0-5
                                                                                                                 "t1 Hwu-  A 2-
FORM V Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                           TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                            TPI1
                                                                                                                    SHEET
                                                                 OF
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
  Eg
  O. EC
  UJ3
  ow
           SAMPLE
                     PROJECT
                                                                                      P>W5E
PIPVATIOM APffcQ*  TQS.S  A=T.


WATER LEVELAND QATF UoT
                                                              mMTBAr-rno   MAT£CO/
                                               	 MAP OF	


                                           DATE EXCAVATED	Sl I61
                                                                                                           WALL OF PIT
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH
EXCAVATION utrrunn


WIHTU  ^" ^7"-   RFPTH
                                                                                          PC 2.2QLC     inftftFP
                                                                  ^7:  RFUAPKS
                             1	1	1	1	1—I	1	1
                                                                  	1	1	1	1	1	
FORM \ T«3t P« Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                         PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                             TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                               TPI8
                                                                                                                       SHEET    /   OF  /
                                                                                               TEST PIT WALL LOG
    UJ
  OJ(j
  f ui
  Q.OC
  III 3
  O0>
           SAMPLE
PROJECT
                               $4 H
             MAP OF.
                                                                                                              WALLOFp,T
                                                                                       MAECoRf
                                                                                                            DATE EXCAVATED
FiPVATinu  A?Pea*  To 5.2  fT	

WATER LEVEL AND PATE  NoT P^COO^TEg.£.D     EXCAVATION METHOD  Ko^ATSO  P&22.O i-C    LOGGER.

APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH_L5_FT.__ winTU   5 FT.    nFPTH  \<* FT.  HFMARKS	
  5  -
   10  -
          13
   15
          15
                                                            I    I    I   I    I    I   I    T  T
                       \    \   I   I    I   I    I    TI   T1   I    I    I   \
                      "I   I    I	1	1	1	1—I	1	1	1	1	T

                                                         LENGTH (FT)
                                                    T	1—T
T	T
                                                                                                                        COMMENTS
                                                                                                LEL--  6%
                                                                                                    =  I Vo 2.
                                                                                                                     Oil e.n^tr'*  p,\-  -from,
                                                                                                                             ®. 7'.
                                                                                                                        i-  5o - 80
FORM \ T«t P« Log For J.H. 8/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                                   . Pi. FT
                                                                                     TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                                                    SHEET
                                                                                                                    OF
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
  fe
  tu
  Sg
   J«
SAMPLE
          PROJECT
                          LAMDFIUU.
PHASE. I
          Fl EVATION A?P&Q7k .
                     WATER LEVELAND OATF MoT ertCOQ»)TE.fcEP
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH  3>o  Pf
                                                                          hATECo /MA £Co£ f
                                                                                      	DATE EXCAVATED
                                                   EXCAVATION METHOD KoMATSO  PC 2.2.O 1-C   LOGGER	i
                                                   WIDTH	g FT'   HFPTH  *•"*-  FT'
MAP OF JlW_ WALL OF PIT
    5/ I
   O
   10  -
         /5
         /7
                                                                                                 I   I    1   I
                                                                                                              -• LEL- 7%
                                              T	1	1—I	\	1	1	1	T
                                                       LENGTH (FT)
                                                                       "I	1	1	1	1	1—I—T
                                                                                                                    COMMENTS
                                                                                                                         5,i«i>>«  os.Mse<  »i
                                                                                                                 turnip ,  not"  \>M oil
                                                                                                                 LEL--  <-%
                                                                                                                     i  o <*t
FORM \Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                       £jLO 4,5561- Fl.FT
                                                                       TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                         TF2-0
                    SHEET   V  OF   /
                                                                                           TEST PIT WALL LOG
    OT
           SAMPLE
                    PROJECT
                    FiPVATinM  APPPa*. 104.5  FT.
                    WATER LEVELAND DATE	
                                                  _ LOCATION—
                                                  MATE.CO /
                    MAP OF Jw	WALL OF PIT
                                                                                DATE EXCAVATED.
                                                                                inanpp  J- ^'
                    APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH_/JL_L=L__ umnru   ^ ^r-    OFPTH   ^ FT* REMARKS
  10  -
      I   I   I   I
SAt-yp .   TIN; \D «\ 8
                                                                                                                      o
                                                      LENGTH (FT)
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                        PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                         C,LO kssbi. FX.FT
                                                                                       TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                                        TPZI
                                                                                                  SHEET    /  OF  /
                                                                                              TEST PIT WALL LOG
  ui in
  tag
  a. oc
  LU3
  OM
           SAMPLE
1
                     PROJECT
                                      LAtJPFIi-L.
                                                                   LOCATION.
                                                                                                  MAP OF W   WALL OF PIT
  FIFUATION  APPE.Q*.  10&.\  FT

                     A/Of
                                                                                     /
                                                                                                DATE EXCAVATED	Hi
           APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH
                                           FYr.AX/ATinM UFTHOn


                                           winTH   ^ ^^    HFPTH
                                                                                             PC, 2Z.O L  ' i  '  j.'   L   t  '    i  .  i ,  i   nr  i    i    i   i    i   i    r
x     —!	*i—rou>rij—ry
                                                                                         7
                                                                                     \   i   i    i   r
                                                            TP 2.1-Ql.
                                               T—r~i—i—i—\—i—i—i—i—i—i—r

                                                        LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                            COMMENTS
                                                                                                                   LEU  ?%

                                                                                                                   Hno- 35
                                                                                                                          6%
                                                                                                                ..  UL -
                                                                                                                                8o°/0)
                                                                                                      - •  -b  Itt
FORM \ Tosl Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                       TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                         TPZZ-
                                                                                                                SHEET   '   OF
                                                                                         TEST PIT WALL LOG
  OO)
          SAMPLE
                    PROJECT
                    PiP\MTif>M APPgo*. ^05. 4-  fT.

                    WATER LEVELAND DATE
_ LOCATION-
 MATBCO /A7/4£da£p
                               Z2.Q
                                                                                           MAPOF
                                                                                                                       w
                                                                WALL OF PIT
                    APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH
                                                     FT-
EXCAVATION UFTHnn

WIDTH __^_f£^_ DEPTH_^_^L_ REMARKS
                                                                                DATE EXCAVATED

                                                                                LOGGER _^/
   /5 -
         /8
i    r  i   i   i   i    i   i    r
                                                        i   T   i   I    r   i    i
                        I   T   I   I    I   I
                                         1	T~P"7 o  ^ I
      T—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—r

                                LENGTH (FT)
                                                                             i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—r
                                                                                                                COMMENTS
                                                                                                              .LEL--
                                                                                                              LEL--  3%
                                                                                                              LEL--
                                                                                                                  = O
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                                   . FI.FT
                                                                          TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                            TP23
                                                      SHEET
                                               /  OF  /
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
  f 2
  CLtr
  UJ3
  am
           SAMPLE
                     PROJECT
                     PIFX/ATIOM
                                    .  707.6)
            _ LOCATION	P*AS£ J

             MArECo /
                                       MAP OF .
                                                                                                        DATE EXCAVATED
                                                                                                                       S  Z2
                                                                                                          WALL OF PIT
WATER LEVELAND DATE

APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH   /g
                                                          A-QA1ATSQ
                                    L(L    LOGGER
WIDTH .
DEPTH.
.REMARKS.
   /o  -
         /3
   /5  -

                                                      i   i   i   i   i   i
                                                                                                    r   i
                                                                                                             • • UL--  3%

                                                                                                                Hnu- O
                                              ~\   i—i—i—i—r—i—i—i—i—i—r

                                                       LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                                   COMMENTS
                                                                                                                LLL-- ZT/6
                                                                                                                                 *t  14'
FORM V Test Pit Log For J.H.. 6/12/69

-------
                                                                         PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                             TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                              TF2.4
                                                                                                                       SHEET
                                 I   OF  I
                                                                                               TEST PIT WALL LOG
IE
uiizr
  o.tc.
  IU3
  Q(0
           SAMPLE

PROJECT
                                5 <
                                                                             inr.ATinM
                                                        MAPOF

                                     WALL OF PIT
                     PIFVATION
                                         70S.-)  fT.
                     WATER LEVEL AND nATF
                                                 15
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH

EXCAVATION METHOD
WIDTH _JL?Il	DEPTH
                                                                                      LOGGER.
                                                                 !& FT.
REMARKS.
   5  -
  15
          IS
         i ?. i  ,
        ,  tine  to
                                            ,i   i   .1    i
                                          .^ broww, dry
                                                         I    I   I    I    I   I    I   I
  I
                                        I   I    I
                                                                                                LE.L--  2.%
                                                                                            • •  Hviu -  2.
                      T	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	T
                                                         LENGTH (FT)
                         COMMENTS
                                                                                                                                        18
FORM \ Toot Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                        PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                         G|UO t.554.1. FX. f-T
TEST PIT NUMBER

  TTZ5
                                                                                                SHEET   I   OF
                                                                                             TEST PIT WALL LOG
           SAMPLE
PROJECT.


PIFVATIOM  APPg.0*.  Ift5,5   FT.


WATER LEVELAND ruTF  APP£O*.
                                                                                                                     MAP DP w   WALL OF PIT
                                                                                    /
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH	^2
CONTRACTOR.

EXCAVATION MFTHnn  koMATSV  PC. 2.2,0 ££,


winTH  8  FT.   DEPTH   "° FT  REMARKS.
         DATE EXCAVATED	S/Z5/
                       I   I    .   ,1   I   I   I
                              £ TO
                                        1	1	1	1	1	1	1	


                                                        LENGTH (FT)
FORM \ Test Pil Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                              PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                 $LO (,55bi. FT. FT
                    TEST PIT NUMBER

                      TPZ-k
                                                                                                                     SHEET   /   OF  /
                                                                                             TEST PIT WALL LOG
  n>o

  O.E
           SAMPLE
•5
i
           PROJECT.
LOCATION.
                         MAP OF  £•   WALL OF PIT
                                            6
                                                                                                          DATE EXCAVATED.
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH.
                                                     WIDTH.
 DEPTH.
.REMARKS.
  5   -
  /o  -
          II
  /5  -
                       1   1    1   1   1    (   1    1
                                                                   1   1    1   1   1    1   1       1
                                                  "i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—r

                                                        LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                                     COMMENTS
                                                                                                                      -- 4%
                                                                                                                      = o
                                                                                                                      -- 0
                                                                                                                 .TPZ(o-oi Hrt is A.
                                                                                                                         of
                                                                                                                   LEL* 0
                                                                                                                   Hnu- 2,
                                                                                                                        >\V
                                                                                                         lo'.
                                                                                                                • • Ho)- o At Ail
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
FORM V Test Pit Log For J.H. 8/12/89

-------
                                                    PROJECT NUMBER


                                                     GLO &55bl. FI.FT
                                   TEST PIT NUMBER


                                     TPZB
                                                                                                                      SHEET
                                                                                                                  OF /
                                                                                              TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BELOW

SURFACE (FT)
           SAMPLE
          1
t
      PROJECT.
                                     LA*>PFIL-I-
                                                                                                                      MAPOP
                                                                                                                                  WAI i OF PIT
                     ELEVATION-
                                         "lot*. \  FT-
                                                             MA TEC.O J MAEC.ot.f>
WATER LEVEL AND DATE.
                            loFT-
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH
                                                        FT,
EXCAVATION METHOD.


WIDTH  6  ^r   DEPTH
                                                                        P£ 22.°
                                            DATE EXCAVATED.


                                            IOGGER  P. w< •
                                                                               RFMARKS
                          1  P .1  .  1   Iv
                          i  \vv\e n> m«d
                          1 L  1   1
                           Prou>n,
                               1   1    1    1   1    1
  5  -
  IO
          10
         12.
              /I
             /
1    1   1
1    1   1    1
                                                                                                  .. Hrw =
                                                                  - 7o
   IS -
       T—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—r—r



                                          LENGTH (FT)
                                                                             1   1   1    1   1    1    1   1    1   1
                                                                                                 COMMENTS
                                                                                                                          >(>p!
FORM \ Test Pit Log Foi J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                      PROJECT NUMBER


                                                                           6556 I. FX. FT
TEST PIT NUMBER


  TPZ*. lb-1.2.  FT.



WATERLEVELANDnATP A?pfr>X.  IP FT'
                                                                            lOOATinM
                                                                                                                     UAPOF
                                                                                                                                 WALLOFPIT
                                                                             MA T£CQ/**£&>&>	DATE EXCAVATED _il£±l82_


                                                               FxnAVATinMMPTHnn  KoHATSO  PC 220 L(L    irvsnpo   B.T,  LAuPE.
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH
                                                        /=7.
                                          wini"
                                                                      6  /=7-
                                                                              nEPTH
                                                                    ^T.
                                                                                             PFMARKS
   5 -
  10  -
                       1
         1   1   1    1   1    1   1   1    1   1    1   1   1
                                                                              1   1   1    1   1    1   1   1
 "IIIIIIIIIIIIT




                                   LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                    I   I    I   I    I    I   I
                                                                                                                      COMMENTS
                                                                                                                   Hnu - 5
                                                                                                                  L£U=  10%
                                                                                                                                       10
                                                                                                                lue\.- 5%
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                             fcSStl. FI. FT
                                                                                 TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                                   TP30
                                                                                               SHEET   /   OF   I
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
  UJni
  OJy

  f U.
  Q.OC
  UJ3
  am
           SAMPLE
U
                     PROJECT
                               5 < H   LAMP Ft LI
                A?PR-o*.
                                               FT.
                                                     _ LOCATION-

                                                      hAFEdo J
                                	 MAPOF_£_ WALL OF PIT

                            DATE EXCAVATED	5! 3'*/ 6?	
      WATER LEVEL AND nATF A?fga*.  S FT
                                         CYrAVATinM MFTMnn
              PC ZIP  L-C
                                                                                             B.T.
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH  Af
                                               WIDTH
                                                   FT.
DEPTH.
REMARKS.
        I   I    I   I   I    I
                                                   I   I    I   I
                                                   I    I   I    I   I   I    I   I
                                                             II]    I   I    I   I    I   I    I    I
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/1Z/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                             fcSSfel. FT. FT
                                                                           TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                            TP31
                                                                                                                    SHEET
                                                    OF
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
           SAMPLE
PROJECT.
                                      LAiJPRU.
. LOCATION.
                                                                  PHASED  LAUDfitA-
                                                                                               MAP OP  &-  WALL OF PIT
                     ELEVATION.
                                               FT,
                                         CONTRACTOR  ^AT£6O/
                                                fc Fr'
WATER LEVEL AND DATE.

APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH_^5_
                                                              EXCAVATION METHOD.
                                                                      PC 220  LC,    IOG«PP   X-^-  3~*nrJsotJ
                                                              WIDTH
                                                                     4/=r'
                                                        DFPTH
                                                                                      '=7"'
                 RFMARKS
                      1    1
                                                                            1
                      1    1   1    1   1   1    1   1    1   1    1   1    1   1    1    1   1    1   1    1   1    1   1    1   1

                                                       LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                                    COMMENTS
                                                                                                                            4i\,ftU«J

                                                                                                                            Corf,"
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 8/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                         G,LO feSSfol.  F1.FT
                                                                           TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                            JP32.
                                                                      SHEET
           OF
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
           SAMPLE
PROJECT.
                                      LAMDFILL
                             LOCATION    PHASE,  t  LAuDFtuv-
MAPOF.
WALL OF PIT
                                       165-5  FT
ELEVATION.
WATER LEVELAND "ATP APPRo*  IS FT.
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH	£
                                                     MAT£CO /
                                                              EXCAVATION METHOD.
                                                              WIDTH	^ FT   DEPTH
                                                                                              ZZo
                                                          DATE EXCAVATED	5/2.g/ 1f9
                                                          LOGGER  B.T. LAOPE.
                                           _ REMARKS.
   S  -
  10  —
   /s -
          IQ
   it>    20
                      I    I
                                                                         I   I    I   I    I
                                                                                                              .. lf-\-~  -T°
                                                                                                                 )4nu-  5,
 1	1	1	1	T
                               Jk
T- i  "i—i   T   i—i—r
         LENGTH (FT)
                         jp 32.-01, Rv\o -  lSo^>f^
                                                                                  i    i    i   i    i   i    i   i
                                                                                                                    COMMENTS
                                                                                                                 LEU'-
                                                                                                              . . LEU-  4%
                                                                                                                 LEU:
                                                                                                              - -  Hnu1  )5
                                                                                                                         p nr
FORM V Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                                  . K.FT
                                                                           TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                             TP33
                                                                                                                   SHEET
                                                              '   OF   /
                                                                                            TEST PIT WALL LOG
DEPTH BE
SURFACE (
           SAMPLE
Interval
PROJECT.
                                   H /~A>JDFILL
                                                                 PtiK>£-
                                                                                                                   MAPOF
                                                                                                                               WALLOFPIT
PIPUATIOM  APPE.O*.   TO I. ft  FT.

WATERLEVELANDDATF APP^rf.-   M  FT.
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH
                                                   '5 /=T.
EXCAVATION METHOD.

WIDTH	& /=r-   DEPTH.
             MAT££Q  / MAS.CQK.P

                  koWftTSU PC2.20
                                                                                                        DATE EXCAVATED.
                                                                                                        loor,PB
                                                                                                                 6. T.
                                                                                       FT
                                                                                          ' REMARKS
   s  -
  /»
          10
          12.
  15  -
                      1    1   1    1   1   1   1   1    1   1    1   1    1   1
                                                       1   1    1   1    1   1    1   1    1   1
 T   I	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	T

                                   LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                  1    1   1    1   1    1   1
                                                                                                                    COMMENTS
                                                                                                                 Hnu -
                                                                                                                LEU'- 5%
FORM V Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                                    . FI.FT
                                                                                              TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                               TP34
                                                                                               SHEET    /  OF  I
                                                                                             TEST PIT WALL LOG
KuJ
00 y
fl2
O.OC
Ufa
oo>
   5  -
           SAMPLE
               &
                     PROJECT
                     WATER LEVELAND RATF  wo 7
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH
            _ inrATinM    PHASE. X UUDFtU,
             MATEOS/ MA£CQg.f	DATE
PYP.AX/ATIHM MFrunn  ko fAAT^ O  PCZZQJ-C	LOGGER.
WIDTH _£_£!!_ nPPTH   /Q^r  REMARKS	
                                                                                                                  MAP OF.
                                                                                                          WALL OF PIT
                                                                                                                 LEU 5%
                                                                                                               -' Mn>|i 50 f
T—i—i—i—i—r
                                              ~\	1	1	1	1	1	T
                                                        LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                              T	1	1	T
                                                                                                                     LE-\_ =
                                                                                                                      16
                                                                                                                     i fio fc>  iot>Vo.
                                                                                                               . .  Mo
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                        PROJECT NUMBER

                                                                                     . FT-.
                                                                            TEST PIT NUMBER

                                                                             TP35
                                                       SHEET   /  OF
                                                                                              TEST PIT WALL LOG
  O.OC
  IIIO
  Q(0
           SAMPLE
                     PROJECT
                                  H
                                                       LOCATION.
                                                       MAP OF.
                               AP?fLD* •  -10^.2- FT.
                     WATER LEVEL AND HATF AP?fU*-
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS: LENGTH
                               I* FT-
EXCAVATION UPTHOH  koWATSO  PC IZO LC

WIDTH	^  ^	DEPTH  /z /"r"  REMARKS-
DATE EXCAVATED.

LOGGER __^J
                                                                                                     5/2*l
                       WALL OF PIT
                       I   I    I
              I   1   I
                                                                      I    I   I    I
                                               TP35-0),
                      1   I	1	1	\	T~1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	T

                                                        LENGTH (FT)
                                                                                                                      COMMENTS
                                                                                                                     -- o
                                                                                                                  H»u--  I
                                                                                                                   LUL-
                                                                                                                                       >

                                                                                                                                   l\  0,V
                                                                                                                                      IT
FORM \ Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
                                                                         PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                                  TEST PIT NUMBER
                                                                                   TP36
                                                                                                                      SHEET   /   OF
                                                                                              TEST PIT WALL LOG
  UJ
    u.
   .OC
           SAMPLE
U
PROJECT   5 <*
ELEVATION.
WATER LEVEL AND OATP  Mor
                                                                                                                             W
                                              FT.
                     APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:  LENGTH
                                                rr.MTPAr.TnQ   MATE&D / ?)?*£&>£(> _ DATE EXCAVATED
                                                cvr.AWATinM MPTunn   kDmATSO  PC. 22.0 LC    LOGGER _ X./V.
                                                                                                                                 .WALL OF PIT
                                          WIPTM  /0 fT-   DEPTH__2£_fI_ REMARKS.
                       I   I   „ I   .1   III   I    I   I    II   I    I   I
                                                    !3
                                                        LENGTH (FT)
FORM V Test Pit Log For J.H. 6/12/89

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4	AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:      Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         John Heinicke/GLO

DATE:      September 28, 1989

SUBJECT:   Soil Boring and Sampling, Installation of Monitoring Wells
            and Gas Probes, and Surveying G&H Landfill Phase III RI

PROJECT:   GLO65561.FI.FS
            GLO65561.FLFI
            GLO65561.FLFG
            GLO65561.FLFM


                               INTRODUCTION


Soil boring  and sampling, installation of monitoring wells and gas probes, and surveying at
the G&H Landfill site in Shelby Township, Michigan, were performed between May 23
and August 25, 1989.  This memorandum presents the following data generated by this
work:

      •     Horizontal coordinates and elevations of soil borings, monitoring wells, and
            gas probes

      •     Soil boring logs at each boring or monitoring well nest

      •     Monitoring well and gas probe construction diagrams

      •     Results of geotechnical laboratory tests performed on selected soil samples

      •     A list of subsurface soil samples collected for analytical testing (see Technical
            Memorandum No. 10 for analytical results)

PURPOSE  AND  SCOPE

The work was performed:

      •     To  obtain  stratigraphic information, with special regard to the hydraulic
            conductivity and attenuation  characteristics of soil deposits

      •     To  obtain  samples of subsurface soils for chemical analysis to further define
            the extent of contaminant source material

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 2
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI
      •     To provide groundwater and landfill gas monitoring locations in areas not
            sampled during RI Phases I and II to help locate contaminant pathways and
            define the extent of contaminant migration from landfill sources

The proposed scope of activities is described in the G&H Landfill Phase III RI/FS Work
Plan (November 18, 1988).  The completed work consists of:

      •     Drilling 8 soil borings

      •     Installing 55 monitoring wells

      •     Installing 7 gas probes

      •     Collecting 18 soil samples for geotechnical analysis

      •     Collecting 48 subsurface soil samples for analytical testing by Contract
            Laboratory Program (CLP)  laboratories and  63 subsurface soil samples  for
            screening by the close support laboratory (CSL)

      •     Surveying boring and monitoring well  locations

DEVIATIONS FROM  WORK PLAN

Five monitoring wells were added to the  proposed scope after the Round 1 sampling visit
revealed that several existing wells could  not be located or were inoperable (see Technical
Memorandum No. 1).  Wells GH08B, GH09A, and GH09B were abandoned by pulling the
casing and grouting the wellhole. Wells GH15B and GH15C had already been pulled (by
unknown party), so the wellholes could not be located and grouted.

Two gas probes, GP04 and GP05, were deleted from the proposed scope because the
Michigan Department  of Natural Resources (MDNR) already has gas probes in the
proposed locations. The MDNR granted the EPA permission to take  landfill gas samples
from their probes.

BORING, MONITORING WELL, AND GAS PROBE DESIGNATIONS

Soil borings, monitoring wells, and gas probes were identified using the same designations
used in  previous site investigations.

Soil boring designations are:

            "B_"   --    drilled outside of landfill

            "RB_"  -    drilled through landfill

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 3
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI
Monitoring well designations are:

      •     "RL_" ~    drilled through landfill; monitoring well screened at the bottom
                        of refuse in leachate zone

      •     "RW_"  —   drilled through landfill; monitoring well screened in the upper
                        sand unit just below refuse
      •     "RD_"  -   drilled through landfill; monitoring well screened in the upper
                        sand unit below refuse and just above  the till unit

      •     "L_"   -    drilled outside of landfill; monitoring well screened in leachate
                        zone

      •     "GH_A" —  drilled outside of landfill; monitoring well screened in the upper
                        sand unit near water table surface

      •     "GH_B" -  drilled outside of landfill; monitoring well screened in the upper
                        sand unit just above the till unit

      •     "GH_C" -  drilled outside refuse area; monitoring well screened in or
                        below the till unit

Gas probes are designated "GP_."


                     FIELD ACTIVITIES AND METHODS


SCHEDULE AND PERSONNEL

Figure 1 is the "as-constructed" work schedule indicating when work was performed and
who was onsite at the time.  Glen Turchan or Dave Cushman of  Connestoga-Rovers and
Associates visited the site once weekly as representatives of the PRPs to observe  drilling
and well installation.

DRILLING PROCEDURES

Borings were drilled using two CME 550 track-mounted all-terrain drill rigs, one CME 55
wheel-mounted all-terrain drill rig, and one CME  75 wheel-mounted drill rig.  The
equipment and drilling crews were provided by Mateco Drilling Company of Grand
Rapids. Each boring was logged by a  CH2M HILL geotechnical  engineer, hydrogeologist,
or geologist.

-------
GL065561.RI FIG1 (1 OF2) 9-18-69
    CREW1
    Gary Quails
    Stan Bevan

    CREW 2
O  Ned Taggart
{jj  Craig Cochrane
I-
<  CREW 3
E  Abed Saab
    Roger Elizardo

    CREW 4
    Vince Bennett
 	Steve Hawley
    SITE MANAGER
    Ike Johnson

    LOGGER/SAMPLER/
    WELL INSTALLATION
    Jim Russell
    Ned Pennock
    Jeff Lament
    John Heinicke
    Mary Reilly
    Louise Palmer
    Dale Cira
    Jeff Keiser
Z
5
   SAMPLE PAPERWORK
   Cathy Kantowski
   Jeff Keiser

   CHEMIST
   Dean Charpentier
   Jan Williams

   SURVEY
   Jeff Keiser
   John Heinicke
MAY
22 , 23 | 24 , 25

MOBE RB25 RB27 RB28
RB26










22 i 23 j 24 j 25
MAY














29 , 30 , 31

•****v^RB28 RW24
1






i-


29 i 30 | 31
1 ! 2

RD24XRW10X






"•••^


^^^^^"
1 i 2














5,6,7,8,9

X X RD24X WH4 RW30
RD24XX
i*
MOBE RL21 RL23 RW101, RL22
RW21 RW23 RL22JRW22X
U










5 i 6 i 7 i 8 i 9














JUNE
12 , 13 | 14 , 15 | 16

>. GH28BGH2BA B16 101
3 GH27A B15 UK
o GH37A
* RW22J B14 B13 GH33B
B14 IGH3SBGH38AGH33A








™™""1

12 i 13! 14 i 15 i 16
JUNE














19 | 20 | 21 , 22 , 23

103 X ._ GH45AGH43B
3 GH44AGH43A
° r\
X GH42B * GH32AIGH34B
GH41B GH03BJGH34A
GH34B;
j *








^^^^^™

19 i 20 i 21 I 22 i 23














26 | 27 , 28 | 29 , 30

\f GH09BGH06AGH40BGH39A
GH09A GH40A
DEMOB










26 I 27 I 28 i 29 i 30


Q
Ul
3
y
COIMTII










       INDICATES DRILLING CREW WAS ONSITE BUT DID NO DRILLING
                                                                                                        FIGURE 1 (Page 1 of 2)
                                                                                                        "AS-CONSTRUCTED" WORK SCHEDULE
                                                                                                        G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                                        TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
GLO65561.RI FIG1 (2OF2) 9-18-89
                    o
                    £
                    s
CREW1
Gary Quails
Stan Bevan

CREW 2
Ned Taggart
Craig Cochrane

CREW 3
Abed Saab
Roger Elizardo
                        CREW 4
                        Vince Bennett
                     	Steve Hawley
                        SITE MANAGER
                        Ike Johnson

                        LOGGER / SAMPLER /
                        WELL INSTALLATION
                        Jim Russell
                        Ned Pennock
                        Jeff Lament
                        John Heinicke
                        Mary Reilly
                    Zj  Louise Palmer
                    X  Dale Cira
                    P  Jeff Keiser

                    I  SAMPLE PAPERWORK
                    O  Cathy Kantowski
                        Jeff Keiser

                        CHEMIST
                        Dean Charpentier
                        Jan Williams

                        SURVEY
                        Jeff Keiser
                        John Heinicke
JULY
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 j 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12) 13 | 14
i\ ' .'"vfV'~V
I GH36B GPI2 \ RL29(GH31C|GH31A Devel/ Devd/ Dwel/ Devd/ Devd/
; GH36A GP06 !GH31CGH31B;GH30A Comp. Coup. Comp. Comp. Comp.
GP11 ! GH31AIGH30B
GP07J ; |
, ' RL29-
^ * u
' . *•* /•*
! i v i v fV
MOBE i GH03C GH29B ;GH29C DeveV De/OI Dwd/ GH09 /GH19B
-- ' GH03C !GH29A GP10 ! Corp. Comp. Camp. GH19B GH14A
|- l- I ! GH29CJ DEMOB
*••* 1 1
1 *:
4/1 :2
^j :^rf
2{':' 3i:
, --

^\ \
3 i 4 i 5 i 6 ! 7 ! 8 i 9 i 10 i 11 i 12i 13 ! 14
JULY

17 ; 18;19
ss—
*"%
MOBEJGH1SCGH1SA
GH15CIGP06 GH15B
^ ; DEMOB


17 i 18 il9
                                                                                                                        AUGUST
                                                                                                                    21 .  22  23 . 24 . 25
                                                                                                                    21 i 22 ! 23 I 24 I 25
                                                                                                                       AUGUST
                        Devd/
                        Comp.
     DEVELOP/COMPLETE
FIGURE 1 (Page 2 of 2)
"AS-CONSTRUCTED" WORK SCHEDULE
G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 4
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI
With the exception of GH15C, soil borings were advanced using 4.25-inch hollow-stem
augers.  At GH15C, both 4.25-inch hollow-stem augers and rotary wash techniques were
used because the hole was double-cased (GH15C is screened below the till  unit).  Drilling
equipment was steam cleaned after drilling at each location.

Drilling was done under Level C and D health and safety protection.  All borings were
monitored continuously with an HNu photoionization device and a monitox cyanide
detector.  Borings advanced through landfill waste or immediately adjacent to landfilled
areas were also monitored with an explosimeter and oxygen meter.  Auger cuttings were
screened using the HNu photoionization device. Cuttings that caused readings of 1 ppm
or greater were drummed in U.S. DOT approved 55-gallon drums and stored onsite.

At boring locations where a monitoring well was not installed or where an inoperable well
was pulled, the borehole was abandoned using a cement-bentonite grout.  Grout was
installed using the tremie method.  Four borings advanced through landfill waste were
abandoned and relocated. The boring designations and reasons for abandonment are:

             RWlOX-high LEL
       •     RW22X~augers hit buried drum
       •     RD24X and RD24XX-augers hit buried metal

SAMPLING PROCEDURES

Soil samples were collected following procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance Project
Plan (September 30, 1988)  for:

       •     Analytical screening at the CSL
       •     Analytical testing at a CLP laboratory
       •     Geotechnical laboratory testing

Soil samples were obtained using 2-inch-diameter split-spoon samplers and 3-inch-diameter
thin-walled tube  samplers (Shelby tubes). Split-spoon samples were obtained continuously
or at 5-foot intervals. Split-spoon samples were not obtained from the zone of landfill
waste for borings advanced through the landfill. Four Shelby tube samples were obtained
from a "till" material that underlies the site at a depth of about 30 feet.

The  split-spoon samplers were typically driven 24 inches.  Recovery of sand, especially
coarse sand with gravel, was low at many sampling locations even though baskets were
used in the spoon.  When recovery was low, several attempts to collect a sample with the
split-spoon were made, and the sampling interval was increased to greater than 2 feet.
Upon opening the split-spoon sampler, the soil was screened with an HNu to determine
the presence of volatile organic chemicals.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4                        AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page5
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI
Soil that was visibly contaminated or that caused HNu deflections was given priority for
analytical testing through the CLP.  Samples of apparently noncontaminated soil (i.e., not
visibly contaminated or not causing  HNu deflections) were also collected for CSL screening
and CLP analytical testing.  Soil was taken directly from the split-spoon sampler and
placed into labeled glass jars.

Soil samples for geotechnical testing were collected to  represent the range of soils
encountered during drilling and to characterize soils at the screened interval of monitoring
wells.

MONITORING WELL INSTALLATIONS

Monitoring wells GH3C, GH29C, and GH31C are screened in the "till."  They were
constructed using 2-inch-diameter, threaded, flush-jointed Schedule 40 PVC riser fitted with
a 5-foot  length of  0.010-inch factory slotted screen.  Joints were wrapped  with teflon tape
to promote a watertight seal.  A filter pack consisting of poorly graded fine sand was
placed in the annulus surrounding the screen.  The rest of the annulus was filled with
bentonite slurry seal and cement grout introduced by the tremie method.  Placement of
the filter pack and slurry was concurrent with  auger removal.

The remaining 52  monitoring wells  were constructed using 2-inch-diameter Schedule 5S
Type 304 stainless steel riser fitted  with a 5- or  10-foot length of 0.010-inch slot stainless
steel wire-wrap screen.  Rubber O-rings were  placed in the joints to provide a watertight
seal.  The soil formation was allowed to collapse in the annulus around the screen  to form
a natural filter pack as augers were removed.  In cases where the  soil formation would not
collapse  over the full  length of the  screen,  poorly graded fine sand was added. For wells
deeper than 16 feet, the annulus was filled with a bentonite slurry seal and cement grout
introduced by the  tremie method.  For wells shallower than 16 feet, the annulus was filled
with a bentonite slurry seal  and crushed bentonite.

Monitoring well GH15C is screened below the till unit. When  the  till unit was
encountered during drilling,  a 6-inch-diameter  steel  casing was installed by pushing  the
casing into the till and grouting  the casing in place using a bentonite-cement grout  mixture.
The 6-inch casing  helps prevent potential migration of groundwater between aquifers.  The
grout was allowed to  set up overnight, and drilling continued the next day using rotary
wash techniques.   GH15C was constructed  using stainless steel riser and screen as
described above.

All monitoring wells, with the exception of L01, L02, and L03, were completed by
installing a 4-inch  square protective steel cover with locking cap over the  well.  The
protective cover is anchored in-place with a concrete collar. Protective covers were not
installed at L01, L02,  and L03 because these wells are screened near the  ground surface
and a protective cover would interfere with the screened zone.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 6
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI
Monitoring wells were developed using a Bremmer valve, bailer, or air lift.  Monitoring
wells were developed until free of sediments or until a constant degree of turbidity was
achieved.  Purge water was discharged to the ground at each respective monitoring well
location per the work plan.

GAS PROBE INSTALLATIONS

Gas probes were constructed using a 10-foot length of 2-inch-diameter Schedule 40 PVC
riser.  The bottom 5 feet of PVC riser was perforated with 0.25-inch-diameter holes spaced
2 inches apart.  A filter pack consisting of uniformly graded, fine gravel was placed in the
annulus surrounding the screened interval, and a 1- to 2-foot crushed bentonite plug was
placed at the ground surface.  The gas probes were completed by installing a 4-inch
square protective steel cover with locking cap over the probe.  The protective cover is
anchored in place with a concrete collar.

SURVEY

An elevation survey was conducted following standard surveying procedures using a Lietz
B2C level.  The elevation datum is USGS monument #F-32-1930 (elevation 688.45 feet)
located near the intersection of the railroad grade and Ryan Road.

Horizontal coordinates were obtained by first measuring distances and angles to known
reference points with a tape and the Lietz B2C level. The measurements were then
plotted on the site aerial map and coordinates were read from the map.


                             TECHNICAL RESULTS
LOCATIONS

The locations of new soil borings, monitoring wells, gas probes, and a river stage marking
are shown in Figure 2.  Well riser elevations and horizontal coordinates are listed in
Table 1. Well riser elevations reported in Table 1 are considered accurate to within
± 0.05 foot;  horizontal coordinates are considered accurate to within  ± 10 feet.

SOIL BORING LOGS

Soil boring logs based on soil identifications made in the field  are presented  in
Attachment 1.  Sampling intervals are noted on  the boring logs.  At well nest locations,
only one log was made throughout the entire depth of the deepest boring.

-------
                                                                     RESIDENTIAL AREA
                                                                                                      •GP07
                                                                                                       A
                                                                                                          IGM27A
o
_j
o
                                                                                                             YARD
- .   ••   DISPOSAL       >jU
•••'• '••.       	         \ ; i
                      IN
               :;; GP11 iO
               i.      III
                                                                                                        GH28A.B
                                 GH32A    GH33A.B , •:.
                                                                                                                                    GH14A,
                                                                                                                    G
                                                                                                                                           RW23 'i
                                                                                                                                           RL23   ':i
                                                                                                                  GP12A
                                                                                                               :
                                                                                                                GH36A.B «
                                                                                                 ••••X ••••"• •_;_.  X«t...;.	.j( . „... •AwX"j™~"~~' X"""*"
                                                                                                    GP03 AJ     |	j ,.,„,„,
                                                                                                       I GH19B    	::z::r^
                                                                                                                          .v*:. '<
                                                                                                                            :| :;
                                                                                                              	i    mi i
                                                                                                              co&fsaeRC«AL
                                                                                                                           O
                                                                                                                       u

                      . •::". ._ x-
                                                                                                                GH40A.B\. " .' •] i;-::.. V

                                                                                                                        GH39A	
     J i:'
     / •'
     >c ,;'
'••   X  / ','
   ''•  / :'-;'
                                                                                                                       ••••••  A  i
                                                                                                                        •  .O : i
                                                                                                                          J-'> 5 5
                     GH45A

                   \
                                                                          GH43A.B    """"'"::':;":^':\:;;:.;:;C.;;•-•••...	  ""-"...,. ;-:HUi!ii ":-   liiH
                                                                   GH08B
                                                                                                               GH09A.B
                                                                                                      22 - MiLE ROAD
                                                                                                                                                        North
                                                                                                                                                                                                     t
                                                                                                                                                                 300
                                                                                                                                                                                                 APPROXIMATE
                                                                                                                                                                                                 SCALE IN FEET
                                                                                                                                              LEGEND
                                                  s«  LANDFILL BOUNDARY


                                                  -x  U.S. EPA SITE FENCE


                                                      GATE

                                                      DITCH. STREAM, OR
                                                  '    RIVER


                                                      TRAIL

                                                      RAILROAD GRADE
                                                  '    (TRACKS REMOVED)

                                                      SOIL BORING (1989)

                                                      MONITORING WELL (1989)

                                                      GAS PROBE (1989)
                                                                                                                                                                                          FIGURE 2
                                                                                                                                                                                          MAP OF SOIL BORINGS,
                                                                                                                                                                                          MONITORING WELLS,
                                                                                                                                                                                          AND GAS PROBES INSTALLED
                                                                                                                                                                                          DURING PHASE III
                                                                                                                                                                                          G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                                                                                                                          TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
                                                                    (Page 1 of 2)
                               Table 1
             ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL COORDINATES
                OF BORINGS AND MONITORING WELLS
                        G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
                      Technical Memorandum No. 4
Boring or
Monitoring Well
Designation
B13
B14
B15
B16
RB25
RB26
RB27
RB28
RW10
RL21
RW21
RL22
RW22
RL23
RW23
RW24
RD24
RL29
RW30
L01
L02
LOS
GH03B
GH03C
GH08B
GH09A
GH09B
GH14A
GH15A
GH15B
GH15C
Elevation
Well Riser (b)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
709.80
710.42
710.69
709.42
709.49
707.10
707.65
709.24
708.04
710.18
712.65
673.02
669.42
663.18
687.93
687.22
683.24
688.15
687.61
704.13
707.31
707.33
707.66
0)
Ground
Surface
696.5
691.6
697.8
697.1
707.6
707.6
706.1
707.4
707.5
708.2
707.1
704.9
706.5
707.6
710.7
670.2
666.8
660.8
684.6
681.0
685.3
702.7
706.5
Horizontal
Northing
49,647
49,200
49,916
50,010
50,252
50,368
50,263
50,084
49,973
50,154
49,960
49,990
50,251
50,000
50,808
50,295
49,956
49,673
48,818
Coordinates (a)
Easting
25,642
26,385
25,195
25,028
25,512
25,525
25,250
25,389
25,953
26,007
25,817
26,222
25,369
25,028
24,487
23,671
23,810
23,883
25,142

48,316
50,875
50,934
26,571
27,204
24,820
(a)  Elevations are based on USGS datum.  Horizontal coordinates are based
    on site aerial map (Abrams 1983).  At well nest, ground surface elevations
    and horizontal coordinates are given for a point at the middle of the nest.
(b)  Well riser elevations represent the top of the stainless steel or PVC riser
    without a coupling attached.

-------
                                                                    (Page 2 of 2)
                               Table 1
             ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL COORDINATES
                OF BORINGS AND MONITORING WELLS
                        G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
                      Technical Memorandum No. 4
Boring or
Monitoring Well
Designation
GH19B
GH27A
GH28A
GH28B
GH29A
GH29B
GH29C
GH30A
GH30B
GH31A
GH31B
GH31C
GH32A
GH33A
GH33B
GH34A
GH34B
GH35A
GH35B
GH36A
GH36B
GH37A
GH38A
GH39A
GH40A
GH40B
GH41B
GH42B
GH43A
GH43B
GH44A
GH45A
Elevation
Well Riser (b)
697.59
704.89
701 .48
701 .87
694.83
693.96
695.47
697.28
697.18
696.98
697.70
697.35
691.81
688.93
688.79
688.11
687.75
697.71
697.63
695.56
696.17
695.06
700.55
686.73
687.41
687.47
688.33
689.64
691.19
692.32
691.69
693.43
(a)
Ground
Surface
694.8
702.6
699.3
692.6
694.9
695.3
689.0
685.6
685.2
695.7
693.7
693.4
697.5
684.0
684.9
685.8
687.0
689.9
689.2
690.9
Horizontal
Northing
49,778
50,554
50,094
49,338
50,005
49,656
49,157
49,174
48,754
49,450
49,888
50,212
49,783
48,960
49,020
49,245
49,400
48,495
48.570
48,743
Coordinates (a)
Easting
26,472
26,460
26,585
26,489
24,192
24,193
24,912
25,250
26,378
25,971
26,759
24,716
25,422
25,822
25,616
24,405
25,789
25,785
25,440
24,795
(a)  Elevations are based on USGS datum.  Horizontal coordinates are based
    on site aerial map (Abrams 1983). At well nest, ground surface elevations
    and horizontal coordinates are given for a point at the middle of the nest.
(b)  Well riser elevations represent the top of the stainless steel or PVC riser
    without a coupling attached.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 4                     AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 7
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI
MONITORING WELL AND GAS PROBE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well construction details for GH15C are shown Figure 3.  GH15C is the only monitoring
well that penetrated the  "till" and thus the only well installed using a permanent surface
casing. Well construction details for all new monitoring wells except GH15C are shown in
Figure 4.  Gas probe construction details are shown in Figure 5.

GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING

Table 2 summarizes the  soil samples collected and the corresponding geotechnical
laboratory tests that were performed.  Attachment 2 contains the results of the
geotechnical laboratory tests.

ANALYTICAL TESTING

Table 3 summarizes the  subsurface soil samples collected for screening by  the CSL and
testing by a CLP laboratory.  Analytical results are presented in separate technical
memorandums (see Technical Memorandum No. 6 for CSL results and Technical
Memorandum No. 10 for CLP results).


GLT863/061.50

-------
                          PROTECTIVE COVER
                                                                        GROUND
                                                                        SURFACE

                                                         6-INCH DIAM STEEL
                                                         CASING GROUTED
                                                         IN-PLACE
                                                         2-INCH DIAM
                                                         STAINLESS
                                                         STEEL RISER
                                                         CEMENT GROUT
                                                         BENTONITE
                                                         SEAL
                                                                       69'
       41
                                                         FILTER PACK

                                                         5'STAINLESS    108'
                                                         STEEL
                                                         WELL SCREEN
                                                                           83.8*
                                            NOT TO SCALE
8
FIGURE 3
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
FOR GH15C
G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
GLO65561.RM FIG4(1 OF 3) 9-15-69
                                                                                                                OTHER WELL
                                                                                                                DIMENSIONS,
                                                                                                             SEE ACCOMPANYING
PROTECTIVE
COVER 	 ^
CONCRETE
GROUND \
SURFACE -\ V

N&WWi$&V>








CEMENT
GROUT' ^
2-INCH
DIAM
WELL
RISER' -



_


-"
v
S
s
s
s
s
s
\
s,

X
s
X
^
^H
















V
^1
vT
^
a
^


T
S
V
s
X
s
s
s
s
s
t
0,
X
x
X
o
O1
X
X
x
X

uiMurmm
MONITORING TYPE OF RISER LENGTHOF TOTAL WELL (1)
WELL COMPLETION AND SCREEN SCREEN DEPTH * B C
DESIGNATION DATE MATERIAL (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT)
RL21 6-6-89 STAINLESS STEEL 10 13.3 NA 2.3 11.0
RL22 6-9-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 10.0 NA 3.0 7.0
SjH-r-




















DhNIUNIIt ••• ••(
SEAL 	 -^ • •

FILTER ^fll H \
niL.icr« ••• ••• *
PACK 	 -^
^^4
WELL
SCREEN '

.
"•'
-j
J
•"

	
~
ih_

...

'/.-.
"J
"."."
i



\
— riLio o-/-oa aiHinLcaa aicci. in it.u nn t.v i£.u
L
RL29 7-7-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 42.6 26.3 6.0 10.3


RW10 6-8-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 16.0 NA 9.0 7.0

RW21 6-6-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 26.0 13.4 4.6 8.0
RW22 6-13-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 27.0 10.0 7.4 9.6

RW23 6-7-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 25.5 11.0 4.3 11.2
RW24 5-31-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 21.4 3.0 10.0 8.4
A RW30 6-9-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 24.8 11.2 16.2 8.6

RD24 6-8-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 43.7 29.0 5.1 9.6


L01 6-16-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 8.0 NA 1.0 7.0
L02 6-16-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 8.5 NA 1.0 7.5
L03 6-19-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 8.0 NA 1.0 7.0
r
L GH03B 6-22-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 25.0 10.0 5.5 9.5

B GH03C 7-7-89 PVC 5 46.0 30.0 8.0 8.0
f
GH08B 6-28-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 17.5 6.0 4.0 7.5
L
GH09A 6-27-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 12.0 NA 5.0 7.0
C GH09B 6-27-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 18.0 6.0 5.0 7.0
GH14A 7-14-89 STAINLESS STEEL 10 14.3 NA 2.0 12.3
r
GH15A 7-19-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 19.0 10.0 2.0 7.0
NOT TO SCALE GHISB 7-19-89 STAINLESS STEEL 5 33.5 21.0 4.0 e.s
(Continued)
              NOTE:
              LO1,L02,ANDL03DONOT
              HAVE PROTECTIVE COVER.
(D
   NA - NOT APPLICABLE; FOR THESE WELLS. CRUSHED
   BENTONITE WAS PLACED FROM THE TOP
   OF FILTER PACK TO THE GROUND SURFACE.
                                                                                       FIGURE 4 (PAGE 1 OF 3)
                                                                                       MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
                                                                                       G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                       TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
GLO65561.RI\ FIG4(2OF3) 9-15-89
       PROTECTIVE
       COVER

    CONCRETE
    PAD
 GROUND
 SURFACE -\
    FILTER
    PACK
    WELL
    SCREEN
                                                   GH198
                                                   GH27A
                                                   GH28A
                                                   GH28B
                                                                          OTHER WELL
                                                                          DIMENSIONS,
                                                                       SEE ACCOMPANYING
                                                                            DIAGRAM
MONITORING
   WELL      COMPLETION
DESIGNATION       DATE
TYPE OF RISER   LENGTHOF
 AND SCREEN     SCREEN
  MATERIAL        (FT)
                                                   (Continued)
                                                (1)
                 7-14-89

                 6-14-89

                 6-14-89

                 6-13-89
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
TOTAL WELL
  DEPTH
   (FT)


   29.5

   14.5

   15.0

   32.0
GH29A
GH29B
GH29C
GH30A
GH30B
7-7-89
7-8-89
7-9-89
7-9-89
7-9-89
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
PVC
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
10
5
5
10
5
12.9
24.0
50.0
18.9
25.2
NA
14.0
38.0
NA
10.2
2.3
2.0
4.0
6.0
5.0
10.6
8.0
8.0
12.9
10.0
GH31A
GH31B
GH31C
GH32A
GH33A
7-9-89
7-8-89
7-8-89
6-22-89
6-16-89
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
PVC
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
5
5
5
5
5
17.8
28.0
53.0
14.3
10.8
NA
12.5
38.2
NA
NA
8.8
5.9
5.5
5.0
3.8
9.0
9.6
9.3
9.3
7.0
GH33B
GH34A
GH34B
GH35A
GH35B
6-16-89
6-23-89
6-23-89
6-14-89
6-14-89
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
5
5
5
5
5
22.2
11.4
25.0
12.5
27.3
8.0
NA
11.0
NA
13.0
5.0
3.5
5.0
5.0
4.8
9.2
7.9
9.0
7.5
9.5
A™
(FT)
18.5
4.0
4.0
20.5
NA
14.0
38.0
NA
10.2
NA
12.5
36.2
NA
NA
8.0
NA
11.0
NA
13.0
B
(FT)
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
2.3
2.0
4.0
6.0
5.0
8.8
5.9
5.5
5.0
3.8
5.0
3.5
5.0
5.0
4.8
C
(FT)
7.0
6.5
7.0
6.5
10.6
8.0
8.0
12.9
10.0
9.0
9.6
9.3
9.3
7.0
9.2
7.9
9.0
7.5
9.5
                NOT TO SCALE
    NA - NOT APPLICABLE; FOR THESE WELLS, CRUSHED BENTONITE WAS PLACED FROM THE TOP OF FILTER PACK TO THE
    GROUND SURFACE.
                                                                                          FIGURE 4 (PAGE 2 OF 3)
                                                                                          MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
                                                                                          G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                          TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
GLO65561.RI\ FIG4 (30F 3) 9-15-89
       PROTECTIVE
       COVER
     CONCRETE
     PAD
    FILTER
    PACK
    WELL
    SCREEN
   OTHER WELL
   DIMENSIONS,
SEE ACCOMPANYING
    DIAGRAM
MONITORING
WELL
DESIGNATION
GH36A
GH36B
GH37A
GH38A
GH39A
GH40A
GH40B
GH41B
GH42B
GH43A
GH43B
GH44A
GH4SA

COMPLETION
DATE
7-5-89
7-5-89
6-14-89
6-15-89
6-30-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-20-89
6-20-89
6-23-89
6-23-89
6-22-89
6-22-89
TYPE OF RISER
AND SCREEN
MATERIAL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL
LENGTH OF
SCREEN
(FT)
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
TOTAL WELL
DEPTH
(FT)
16.4
32.0
12.0
12.4
9.0
10.0
23.5
22.5
27.3
15.0
30.0
16.0
16.0
(1)
A"
(FT)
NA
18.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
10.0
9.0
14.5
NA
17.0
4.0
4.0

B
(FT)
3.2
4.8
5.0
4.7
2.0
3.0
5.0
5.0
5.1
7.0
5.0
4.0
4.5

C
(FT)
13.2
9.2
7.0
7.7
7.0
7.0
8.5
8.5
7.7
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.5
                                           (1)
                                               NA - NOT APPLICABLE; FOR THESE WELLS. CRUSHED BENTONITE WAS PLACED FROM THE TOP OF FILTER PACK TO THE
                                               GROUND SURFACE.
               NOT TO SCALE
                                                                                    FIGURE 4 (PAGE 3 OF 3)
                                                                                    MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
                                                                                    G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                    TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
                                         PROTECTIVE
                                         COVER
                                      CONCRETE
                                      PAD
                                   GROUND
                                   SURFACE x
                                      FILTER
                                      PACK-
                                      PVC
                                      RISER
                                      ANDSCREEN-
                                                Not To Scale
                                                               B
OTHER
GAS PROBE
DIMENSIONS
GAS
PROBE
DESIGNATION
GP06
GP07
GP08
GP09
GP10
GP11
GP12

COMPLETION
DATE
7-18-89
7-6-89
7-6-89
7-13-89
7-8-89
7-6-89
7-6-89
TOTAL
DEPTH
(FT)
7.7
7.2
7.7
6.0
7.0
6.1
7.3

A
(FT)
1.5
1.3
1.5
0.8
2.0
0.9
1.3

B
(FT)
6.2
5.9
6.2
5.2
5.0
5.2
6.0
in
2
                                                         FIGURE 5

                                                         GAS PROBE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
                                                         G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                         TECH. MEMO. NO. 4

-------
               Table 2
       SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING
         G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
       Technical Memorandum No. 4
Boring or
Monitoring Well
Designation
B15
RD24
GH03C
GH09B
GH15C
GH28A
GH28B
GH29B
GH29C
GH30B
GH31C
GH33B
GH39A
Sample
Designation
GH-B15-13-16
GH-RD24-20-24
GH-RD24-24-28
GH-GH3C-42-44
GH-GH9B-10-12
GH-GH15C-43.5-45.5
GH-GH28A-11-13
GH-GH28B-29-30
GH-GH29B-12-14
GH-GH29C-27-29
GH-GH29C-46.5-48.5
GH-GH30B-9-11
GH-GH30B-19-23
GH-GH31C-21-23
GH-GH31C-51-52
GH-GH33B-14-16
GH-GH33B-23-24
GH-GH39A-4-8
Depth of
Sample
(ft)
13-16
20-24
24-28
42-44
10-12
43.5-45.5
11-13
29-30
12-14
27-29
46.5-48.5
9-11
19-23
21-23
51-52
14-16
23-24
4-8
Grain-Size
Distribution
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Natural
Moisture
Content


X

X



X

X


Atterberg
Limits


X

X



X

X


Permeability


X

X



X

X



-------
                                              (Page 1 of 3)
               Table 3
SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
FOR ANALYTICAL SCREENING AND TESTING
         G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
       Technical Memorandum No. 4
Boring or
Monitoring Well
Designation
B13
814
B15
B16
RB25
RB26
RB27
RB28
RW10
RW21
RW22
RW23
RW24
RD24
RL29
RW30
L01
Sample
Designation
GH-B1 3-9-11
GH-B13-11-15-01
GH-B13-15-17
GH-B14-11-13-01A
GH-B14-13-15-01B
GH-B14-11-15-01
GH-B14-15-19-02
GH-B15-10-13-01
GH-B1 6-9-1 2-01
GH-B1 6-1 2-1 7-02
GH-RB25-22-26-01
GH-RB26-1 8-22-01
GH-RB27-19-21
GH-RB27-21-23-01A
GH-RB27-23-25-01B
GH-RB27-21 -25-01
GH-RB27-25-27-02A
GH-RB27-25-27-02B
GH-RB27-25-29-02
GH-RB28-17-21-01
GH-RB28-23-27-02
GH-RW1 0-16-19-01
GH-RW21-16-18-01A
GH-RW21-1 8-20-01 B
GH-RW21 -16-20-01
GH-RW21 -24-26-02
GH-RW22-13-15
GH-RW22-17-19
GH-RW22-1 9-23-01
GH-RW22-25-27
GH-RW23-14-20-01
GH-RW23- 20-22-02
GH-RW24-1 8-22-01
GH-RD24-24-28-01
GH-RD24-35-36.5
GH-RL29-39-43-01
GH-RW30-23-25-01
GH-L1 -3-6-01
Depth of
Sample
(ft)
9-11
11-15
15-17
11-13
13-15
11-15
15-19
10-13
9-12
12-17
22-26
18-22
19-21
21-23
23-25
21-25
25-27
27-29
25-29
17-21
23-27
16-19
16-18
18-20
16-20
24-26
13-15
17-19
19-23
25-27
14-20
20-22
18-22
24-28
35-36.5
39-43
23-25
3-6
CLP (a)
VGA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BNA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PEST/
PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Oil&
Grease
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X

X
Dioxin/
Furan
X
X


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X


Incineration
Parameters (b)
X

X




X

X
X

X




CSL(c)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X


X

-------
                                             (Page 2 of 3)
               Table 3
SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
FOR ANALYTICAL SCREENING AND TESTING
        G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
       Technical Memorandum No. 4
Boring or
Monitoring Well
Designation
L02
L03
GH03B
GH03C
GH08B
GH09B
GH15C
GH19B
GH27A
GH28A
GH29C
GH30B
GH31C
GH32A
GH33B
GH34B
GH35A
GH35B
GH37A
GH38A
GH39A
*
Sample
Designation
GH-L2-4-6-01
GH-L3-4-6-01
GH-GH3B-11-13
GH-GH3B-25-26
GH-GH3C-41 -42-04
GH-GH8B-9-11
GH-GH8B-14-16
GH-GH9B-9-11
GH-GH9B-10-11
GH-GH15C-78.5-80.5-01
GH-GH19B-25-26-01
GH-GH19B-30-31-02
GH-GH27A-9-11-01
GH-GH28A-9-11-01
GH-GH29C-24-25-01
GH-GH29C-25-26-01
GH-GH29C-45-46-02
GH-GH30B-1 2-14-01
GH-GH30B-24-26-02
GH-GH31C-24-26-01
GH-GH31C-49-51-02
GH-GH32A-6-8
GH-GH32A-10-12
GH-GH32A-12-16-01
GH-FRGH32A-1 2-1 6-01
GH-GH33B-9-10-01
GH-GH33B-1 0-1 1-02
GH-GH34B-9-11
GH-GH34B-11-13
GH-GH35A-13-15-01
GH-GH35B-18-20
GH-GH35B-26-28
GH-GH35B-28-30-01
GH-FRGH35B-28-30-01
GH-GH37A-4-7-01
GH-GH38A-9-13-01
GH-GH39A-4-6
Depth of
Sample
(ft)
4-6
4-6
11-13
25-26
41-42
9-11
14-16
9-11
10-11
78.5-80.5
25-26
30-31
9-11
9-11
24-25
25-26
45-46
12-14
24-26
24-26
49-51
6-8
10-12
12-16
12-16
9-10
10-11
9-11
11-13
13-15
18-20
26-28
28-30
28-30
4-7
9-13
4-6
CLP (a)
VGA
X
X

X


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X

BNA
X
X

X


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X

PEST/
PCB
X
X

X


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X

Oil&
Grease
X






X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X



Dioxin/
Furan







X


X





X




Incineration
Parameters (b)



















X

CSL(c)
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X


X
X



X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

-------
                                                                               (Page 3 of 3)
                                         Table 3
                      SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
                      FOR ANALYTICAL SCREENING AND TESTING
                                 G&H Landfill Phase III Rl
                              Technical Memorandum No. 4
Boring or
Monitoring Well
Designation
GH40B
GH41B
GH42B
GH43B
GH44A
GH45A
Sample
Designation
GH-GH40B-4-6
GH-GH40B-15-16
GH-GH41B-9-11
GH-GH41B-21-23
GH-GH42B-14-16-01
GH-GH42B-18-20
GH-GH43B-9-11
GH-GH43B-20-30
GH-GH44A-8-10
GH-GH45A-10-12
Depth of
Sample
(ft)
4-6
15-16
9-11
21-23
14-16
18-20
9-11
20-30
8-10
10-12
CLP (a)
VGA






BNA






PEST/
PCB






Oil&
Grease






Dioxin/
Furan


X



Incineration
Parameters (b)






CSL (c)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(a) CLP designates a U.S. EPA contract laboratory program laboratory.
(b) Incineration parameters include: Btu, % ash, % moisture, % volatile solids, and fixed carbon.
(c) CSL designates a close support laboratory.

-------
                    Technical Memorandum No. 4

                           Attachment 1
                       SOIL BORING LOGS
GLT863/054.50

-------
KW.KIIH
                                      PROJECT.NUMBER
                                     BORING NUMBER
                                        6)3
                                                                                            SHEET
                                                                                                    /   OF   1
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT
          G, t H
                                                     R.g.
ELEVATION
                                          DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE  NJoT
CflAE. 850  .
                                                       tf.S.A.  •  Z"  SPLIT
               START
                                   FINISH
                                           -
J —
si
IU ...
DEPTH B
SURFACI
0
5 -

10 -



-
|c


-

_!
INTERVA
1

11

/3


/5

'7

SAMPLE
O
TYPE AN
NUMBEF


5-1

3-Z

5-3

d-^l.
O T


>
rr
RECOVE
(FT)


0.5

d),"?

0-3


I-O

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

/«-ZO -20-21
C-fo)
;«-2o-;y-/7
(3<>
9-/0-9- /5

C'°J
5-4-8-/0
(/-f;

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
Poofcu^ -<5|KAt>tD SASD *y siuT < 10%
^ravelj bkck; moi%f , de*^5^ (_ 5P-Sn)~
POORU^ -GifcAOE-b <^OACSE "SAMPj ">57.
 ABOVE, VVier) PooaL-J-
G&AOEO F>M£ -SAWD, black, (*t\, o«\v "
(SP5
A4 ABOUT C-^P). e*^.at noT-o^v

B.o.rt, Q. 17'
i

o
o
o
so
> o
(0-1











COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Lave.) d.




<^rl'o/p "0 1 : // - 15




-
                                                                                                REV 7/86 FORMD1S86

-------
                                 PROJECT NUMBER
                                   G,LO
                                                           BORING NUMBER
SHEET
          OF
                                                       SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
ELEVATI
DRILLINC
WATER L
» _
DEPTH BELO1
SURFACE (FT
O

5 -
-
IQ -
-

'o
-
2.0-
-
ON nPII 1 INfi CONTRACTOR MA TEC.O
3 METHOD AND
EVEL AND DATE
Fn,,,ou«.T CM£ 850- 4-J4-" MS. 4. : 2/7 SPLIT 5/=boA/5
-^//•^
• b.q*.'j i-l'b-'D START ^-/3-*79 FINISH ^"^3 -*8? I DfiRPR */• P^A/AtoC k

SAMPLE
INTERVAL
4
t
9
;/
13
15
11
n
Zl

TYPE AND
NUMBER

S-,

5-2.
5-3
^
5-5
*i.
5-7

RECOVERY
(FT)

/./

«
/•i
,.+
/-I
2.0


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

5-/0-/4-/5

5"c7;"^
5-5-/M3
%74""
2-1-1-15
2,1-31-21-2*
(59^
(43)

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
PooeLV- BEADED FINE. «=,A,Nb 04- Kr~,,^
fvwstj med. divx'St (SP^
Upper 0.4' AS ABOVE then PooEkV-
4PAOE.O COAE<,E SANP, Wa.tk,
votf, 0>^ (SP)
Wpper 0.2.' A5 ARdVE. fWtt SiuTV C-LA*} j
Upper 0.8'A5 ABOv/£l(Mt-a.^ th*»»
FbofcL^ -dEAOED FINE. ^AND, ^r^, voe.4,-

A3 ABOVE C^p)
SILrV SArvJD VA^.wet, »• .
0
G.H P14 o^- I5'-I?/
-


-
                                                                                    REV 7/86  FORM D1586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                      BORING NUMBER
                                         BIS
                                                                                           SHEET
                                                                                                      OF
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
          G, £ H
                                                               LOCATION.
ELEVATION .
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE */OT
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR
 CMg  850'.  4-^"   MS. 4.
                                                               MA TEC.O
                                                                    2." SPLIT  5/=bo/yys
               START
                                   .FINISH.
*_
DEPTH BELO\
SURFACE (FT
O
.5 -


-
IS -
-
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
f
10
12.
If
It

TYPE AND
NUMBER

S-l
5-Z
w
w

RECOVERY
(FT)

Ao
.»
/.Z
,.3

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
IN)

TT"
S-ll-1-12
5-7-«-9
(/5)
('3J>

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
FlU , mnied "s^iTd a»vJ aravtl TO 1.5"
WEUL-CI&APED •sAhJp roondeJ, Vac*.
(.
-------
                        PROJECT NUMBER
                                                     BORING NUMBER
                                                                            SHEET
                                                                                    /   OF  /
                                                 SOIL BORING LOG
I H
PROJECT_
ELEVATION	

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.

WATER LEVEL AND DATE	
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
 CM£  850 •  +*/+"  tf.S.
                                                . LOCATION _
                                                 MA TE.C.Q
                                                          SPLIT
                               START.
                                  . FIN.SH
                                                          t-IS-Vf
* —
k
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O

.5 -
-

/O -

-


/*> —




_J
INTERVA
4

£
•
x
in
s
SP
at


0.9


o.-i-

/.O

0.5


0.1

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

i-io-n-itp
(Zl)

7-10-1- 12-
(n>
5-1-7- >Z
(H>~)

s-s-s-t,
/ i — x
(/»->
1-4-4-t,
C<>

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME, COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
/ILL SAnd OjnA arAVtl 4e> I " wij, « oU,/.™*
^i^-e.
-
WEUU-G,PAOEO -SArNfe VJ/ <3,&AVEL,J rou^l^
-te Vz" mi. o\>ser«d s,^ ^ b\ack_, too
(O -1














COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Level D

"
-


qrt-Bifc-oi •- V-/*-'
•


^H" Bit- oZ • 12. - n


-
                                                                                REV 7/86 FORM 01588

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                       QLO
                       BORING NUMBER
                        LI
                                               SHEET
                                                          OF
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
          G, 4 H
                                                               LOCATION.
                                       :zzz.
ELEVATION .
                                         DRILLING rONTHACTOR    MA T££.O
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE  ^oT NEASUg.£f>
                              CM£ 850  -.
                        Z" SPLIT
START
                    . FINISH.
                                                  J.
*r-
i£
IU i.i
DEPTH B
SURFACI
0
„
_
-

•5 -


-
10 -

_J
INTERVA
0.5
•2..S

1-.S


t,.s

-a.5

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF

5-|

S-2.


S-3

S-4


>•
X
Ul
O
K

l.o

0.9


6.9

0.)

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N>

S-i-S-lO
(PJ
5-fe-fe- -8
0^3
1 .^.1 . K
X ~*r~5 *
C^
3-4-4-3
c^

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME, COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL

FIL.U, mo*tlw SA^D WxH\ % ARfiVF f ^C."^ »j\1Hi ^f*Jtm4 a"f"

-f»^ Sa«\d
ft»oei.s-<3j&AV)E.o s^^JC> w/ ^IL-T,
me^iu*^ coaLf6«.j qjri«j , weVj Jloo^ (SP3
B.o-H- (2. 8-5 '
1

O
O
CD
so
> O
(O -J










COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
1 . .I f.
L£v&>\ L7 .
;
$H - LI-QI •• 3.5'-6.5


-

-
See wje.^/ (2ff7i*^ruthon,
J/a<»rain. -
                                                                                                REV 7/86  FORMD1586

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                        G,LO
                                                                    BORING NUMBER



                                                                       LZ.
                                                                                            SHEET
'   OF  /
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT   £ 4  H
                                                               . LOCATION.
                                                                                  JET
ELEVATION.
                                          DRILLING rnNTRAr.TOR    MA TE.C.O
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT



WATER LEVEL AND DATE /^°~l~
                                      &90 •
                                                                                  5/=bQA/5
                                              START
                                                                 . FINISH.
                                                                                     .LOGGER.
                                                                                              -IT

ui uT
ll
& 1C
O

:


-
.
-
/o -

_,
INTERVA
0.5
2.5
4-.S


6.5

1,5

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBER

S-l
5-L

S-3


S-+


re
RECOVE
(FT)

O
0.5

/•2


O.T

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
(N)

4-3-V z.
(6)
(3^
10 W
i? 5 *~Z
G?)
3-5-5-7
O;>

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL

WO £.ECov£ty free fiooY m 4-ip of
•Spoovi
CLA^y SAMD, b^,, «CT| W C^O -
Opper O.l' A^> ABOVE (^c^, tVi€»i
Po6£L.s-Gie.ftDe.& Sfcioo *•/ siv-T , )o)a«.k,
io*.Vj Juio^t (5P-5M5
WE.LU-C,&ADe.t> 5ANJD w/ SluT. kbw k -
i*V, ^Mc (?«-*«>
8.0. H. @ 8.5'

u
o
ca
> o
CO -J









COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION


^H- LZ- 0) •• 4'-4>'


-
-I / ; •
C^n i-2. Qi. • ^,5 - 3,5
See. tOtM C'C'n»1^
                                                                                                REV 7/86  FORMD1586

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                               BORING NUMBER
                                    L3
                                                                                             SHEET
                                                                                                      /   OF /
                                                                SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
          G, 2 H
                                                                LOCATION.
                                              -ZZT
ELEVATION.
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR	
 850 •;  4-1^."  M 5. 4.
                                                                       "
                                                                          SPLIT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE .
                                             . START
                            . FINISH.

Sit
DEPTH B
SURFACf
O
-

5 -
-
/o -

_,
INTERVA
2
4-

I


SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF

S-,

s-z



cc
RECOVE
(FT)

o. /

/•O


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

IV yX W VJ
y. *>. f-i



SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
FATCLAI >WP PEAT, bl&cJr, i/uef,
l/ery <&£+ (orf /O
^^^-^^— ^^— f t 1 ^
-
U • v* IT * >i»

u
o
CD
so
(A -1






COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Leve.1 D
-

GjH- L.-S-O I : T 4> _
-
Se«- well C6r>^VvcHov^
                                                                                                 REV 7/86 FORMD1586

-------
^B
£<»Jftjf///U
^^
PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER
/ OF /
SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT Gf S, H LAfiJDplLl- mrATION
FLFVATION nnii iiNfi roNTRAr/rnR MATE£O
nmi i iwrsiuPTHnn AND FOIIIPMFNT CfA£. 85O • +/+" tf.S.A. • 2' SPLl 7~ 5n3OA/5
VUATCQ | FUCI awn r>ATF START 6-S-&? FINISH <£-8-8? i nrsr.FR ^


KOSSHi-L.

jguT
B Q

Ul 3
Oo>
0
-
5 -
/o -
-

/5 -

"


Zo~
-
SAMPLE
-j
cr
L1J





14


I V>

18

i /



Q^
Q. ^
ni






s-i


5-2
5-3




z
Ul
Orr
UJ £






O.Z


l-o
0.5




STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)






6-4-7-8
(13)

I6-I4-I-J-H
(30





SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL

Ao COTTMO<. $.
Upper 2' SfVrtD^) UoAt^j fhevi
-
-
-
££FU1»E. o.od PoofcLS- GEAOEO COARSE.
SAioO , ^fis j totVj oily (^>P) —
PooeiN -fifcAOEO P.MP SM*1>. br0u)r,."
wfcT' , ^e*\4fi (5P^
AS ABovt Cs?^

B.o.H. <3 1? '



u
o
o
ag
M_l














COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
L&v&l  .
3tt- R-vo-io- o\-. /t.' is' -


See voe>\ CoiTS^TucriDn
id\aArayv> ~
0
REV 7/86  FORMD1586

-------
sss
*>:«/://«

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER
G,LO (oSStol.fl.?! £W2|
SHEET / OF /
SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                                                                   LOCATION.
ELEVATION.
                                            DRILLING nnNTBAfrrnp    MA TEdO
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT_



WATER LEVEL AND DATE "* ^8'5  ty-'S •'•
8SO -.
                                                            .S. A.  •   Z"  SPLIT
                                               START
                                                                    . FINISH
                                     £-<£ - 89
                                                                                           i PROPS
                                                                                                    -J-.

III III"

o
5 -
10 -

15 -




2.0



'

.,



_j
INTERVA
14

H.


11!

Zo

Z2.

24


24,

SAMPLE
Q
Z J


S-/


s-z

5-3

5-4

S-5

Si
~4>



RECOVE
(FT)


0.5


/.o

/.S

A*

Zo


'T>

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

5-4-4-^Z
(«
^5-\1-3o-^i

C-W
17-20-11-10
(39;
»-<2-y4-28
(2W
i-n-iio-il
&>
t-\4-)$- r%

(273

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME, COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
A^Cf-K. CUTTIMGi5'
SiUT^f ^AN^ > b^a-ckj o\ 1 -s'ksned
PoofeLN- GR/\OEO SAlJOj C0&r*t 101^
frart afavfr^ ^ra voef , -?oo&€. ^SP> —
Pooe.u'S -G&RD&D SAwt>. coa-cse.. flfaw,

wt.^" , dfcn*?. (SP?
AS ABOVE. (t>r)

As ABooe (SP)

AS ABOVE. CSP)

tipper l-o ' A6 ABOVE j rVw Pooa.^-
6itADtr> SAND . -$-\vi<> ar&vj . iAje.t". —
w|"*lt' " 	 "-"- ' J *''*.) Q 1 * ;
6.O.H- £. ZA> '
t

o
o
o
so
53
















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Le.ve.1 C.
Drill fHrouaL, re4t*se tfrne.

QM-RiM-zl-oi- .4'- 18'-









; ,
Gf tt~ K.v\l-Z. 1- 02. '• <4 ~Z4

See we.ll cjn^}rnA^\tn\
dldqrArn •
d
                                                                                                      REV 7/86  FORM 01586

-------
Ppo..prT    G, t  H   I-AUDFILI-
PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                    BORING NUMBER
                                                                      RWZZ.
                                                      SHEET   /    OF |
                         SOIL BORING LOG
ELEVATION	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR	
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT   CM£ 8SO  *	4- ^ x/	//> S. ^ .
                                     PHASE  X
                              TE.C.O
WATER LEVEL AND DATE ~ *7-*  ^-^-\
      I                   I CTAMnAB
                               Z" SPLl T
       START
                            FINISH
                                                i nr,r,FR
* —
it
III m
•g
£S
S5
o
5 "~
/o -




/ /r





Zo -




5 e;




_J
INTERVA
1

II

13

15

17

11

ll

23


2.5

2.7

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF

5- I
1

5-2
S-i
-j

S-4-
3-5


-4>
^-i
o /

s-*


-9


>
a:
UI
O
ig




0,g>

• Z

/•I
D£T> S*MD WlTrt SILT, "PjXr
0,7' dark Wi, +Heb 5A>N&.  SAMD WITH G,EflVEL,
«fi^ i«>B> o.|' fh^ck black la^e^ fwoivf "
r*\e«l. ddv\^e. (SF)
A3 ABovE, except black (Sf)

PooKl-N- GPADED COARSE SA.MD, black,
W
A6 ABOVE (^^

OPO€»- o,»' A^ABo^E. -t-taw l^ogL-/-
GiEAOEo F^WE SAtoOj t\ac.K^ iA>eT , wed.j
de*v->e (S?j
Upfer 0.2' A,S Atov/£, fVie^ brow^^^P)

B.o.M, e ^-7'
i

u
o
ID
zo
>• o
(A -J





















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Levtl d.
•Drill throat, rt^e iotte
to»'HiOi\T 5^mo|li-t» .
' ^






Evacoak A>^i w»>^ W 1°
ivunutt*, due it> hi^li L.EL-.



$H- PW-Z2.-OI •- n'-Z2»'



-



•See w«.l\ oms'h'Mt^inT,
dia^rair\.
                                                          REV 7/86  FORM D1586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                       G,LO
                                                                   BORING NUMBER
                                                                                            SHEET
                                                                                                       OF /
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT
                                                              , ior.ATinM
ELEVATION	
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT   CMg
                   ~/5.3' />.j.s.-.  6-
                                         DRILLING KONTRACTOH   MA TEC.O	
                                            .  4-^-x/  M.S.A.;   2"  SPLIT 5/=bJ)
-f-7-/3-/4
(Zo;
IS-H-I5-I5
(sz;


SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
Au^Efc. Cvrmw^ ••
BlAckj oi 1 - •sVd.med refu.K and
5^v>dy loary\.
Uaoer d.Z* 0//W SflNJD u»Hi tOOOcJ JeWlSj
•t-^« POOELN- 
moot" fo uittj cle*\*e (SP3
AS ABOVE. C5P)
AS ABOVE (.SO

A5 ABOVE CSP)

AS ABo\y£ O?)

Upoer 1.5' AS ABOVE.. tVi R>oei.S-
^E-ftOED SANfc, ^€.} brown, w«-^, ~
<^e*v*e. O55*-)

B.o.H. @ Zfc.5'
l

SYMBOLIC
LOG


COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING,
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Level C.
Drill iVouAi rt-fw-ve gone,
tOI^Oui" SAmpllHA .
L£L>loo%, Evatuak. iwd -
a^oio ^ok r-o VCnT -fo»-
Z Virs.
dViandt l» Levd D.
3H- fc\M- ii-01'. lV-2o' -



G,tf-RvO- 23-02' *o'- Zi'


-

See we. If cwsfrn.e-'?^
diStar&ffO .
                                                                                                REV 7/86 FORM 01586

-------
s^s
[9iz?j.jsim
I^H
PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER
G|LO ^5 5&» I . Fl . /^X RW £4- SHEET / OF
/
SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT Gt f, H LAf^DpfLi. LOCATION P>M5E I LAWt>F)Ll-
Fl FUATION DPII 1 INR CONTRACTOR MA TE.C.O
nai| | iM^MFTHnn ANnFOiiiPUFNT C/V\£ 85O J 4-/+" H • 5. ^ . ' 2" SPLlT 5rt3OA/S
WATFP.FVFI AMnnarp MoT MEASo^£-D START 5-3J-8*? FINISH 5-3I-&1 , nr.r,FR A; . P£A/A/OC/<




I-
X «(
a K
W3
On
0
-
5 -
-
/5 -
-
-
"} n

•




i5-
SAMPLE
J
cr
UJ






18


lo


2Z

24


°^

a. ^
£i







5-1


b-Z

5_ i
j


oc
UJ
§
Op
St







1.2.


LI


°-l


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS

6"-6"-6"
IN)







/3-/3 -10-10
(2.3)

(,-1-li-l
/ ,a\
\ 'J
10-10- f-Jt,
(IV


SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL

Au& EK. £u TT>MO '•
A$ ABoi/g.
-
Pooeu-y -ae.pipE5 SAMD, coarte u>\\\\
TTa^& qravtlj b)acK, vutVj vtvN o>lsj
weJ, aeiA^e (Sp?
A5 ApOVE . C-Htep-V y\t) qr&\if.\ (^P^
0

Upper o,5; A6 ABOVE t/Sen hboKj-V-
£itRO£O 5IVMO -i -fme brow»r> wtT,

e.o. /y. <& 2.4- '
'

o
3
a
z o
 _l















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Uv&l (L.
Drill throitfik re^H5-e Z
-------
^S
&"VS'i«//W
^^
PROJECT NUMBER
BORING NUMBER
R.O24- SHEET 1 OF Z-
SOIL BORING LOG
Ppn.iPfrr G, £ H t-AUDFlLL. , nrAT.oM PHASE. I L*Mt>fM-L
Pl PVATION nRII 1 INn rnNTRACTOR M>
ff^tf ft*SO < A.\/j4- " Li ^ A '
PRH | |(Jrt MPTWnp ANIPFOIIIPMPWT , t-'V).rr.., O^ * ^ T fl • ^ • 1- j
^T£^O
2/x SPLIT 5^30A/5
WATFD1p«Pi AMnnATP MOT MEA-SU^ES START 6-7-^9 FINISH 6-<- ^9 , ORRFR ^ LAMoMT
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
O


-
5 ~
10 -
15 -





»-




3o
SAMPLE
INTERVAL







^0

2.2.

24
ifr


Z&
Z^.5

TYPE AND
NUMBER









5-1


s-z

b-J

5-4

RECOVERY
(FT)









1.3


1.5

I.O

1-5

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)








4--1-I3-/I
(zz;


(2?;
4-I9-/7-/6
/•2/ ^

7-/l-)5
(27;

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME, COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
(
A * \f- W^i? ^11 TT )Kl^ ^ t~KjD J^\ ^5 ~" \ ? •
SA^o m>x«cl Intlo boHU* pape^
wire , zkc..
-
-
-

PooVJUS -fiEJftDED SAUD CAArSC. unTV\

sik^^^vel *° 2 "**'


Poo|e.LN- GRAT>Et> t>NviD, ^m«. OT-AV
/ J Q ' _
(SP)
A6 ABOVE. C^p)


A^> A6o\/£ Ct>P^ AViixiefi V'o Sll_T"V
-1 	 'i' J j

SYMBOLIC
LOG


















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Uve.1 C.

Drill +1^1, reW star,*.
~~P T
-
-
-
-


Duller noVe^> a.u«e<" i* pws^m'i
ftV>WU W>1<. <^ ofrie-t lo'.







REV 7/86  FORM D1586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                             BORING NUMBER
                                RD24
                                                                                         SHEET
                                                                                                    OF
                                                             SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                   LANDFILL.
ELEVATION .
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
 8SO  •  4*4"  /y.S<
                          LOCATION.
                          A/U TEC.O
                                     PHASE.  X   LAMt>p)LU
                                                                       SPLl T
      ^PV/C. AMnnATF
                                            START
                                                               F|NISH
                                                                                   i nr,r,FR
* _
of
sir
DEPTH B
SURFACI
3o
-
-

"

-
-

_j
INTERVA
35
36.5
40
4-J
45

4-7

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF

5-5

S-6


5-7


IT
RECOVE
(FT)

/,5

(.0


2.o

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"

(403

SO -Si

4-7-7-7
04;

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
SAKlDV SlUT, flfi-y (.51^)
-
SILT, ^ (MlO
-
SlLT^ CUA^ CML-C-U)
"
B.o.H- S. 4-7'

u
0
a
10
>o
at _i








COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-
G\\\- RD -Z4-02 '• 35 '-34. 5*
-

.
<^. &D-24-03 : 45 -47
"
See. vJe.ll djrr\t>Tt <*£.)" ><>n.
Jia^rd.rn. .
                                                                                             REV 7/86 FORM 01588

-------
SB
^^
PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER
qi_0 (oSStel.fX.FX R6Z5 SHEET
1 OF /
SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT $ 4 H /LAUDFlLl- , OCATIOM PHASE. X L^MODFlL-U
R FVATION noil I iwrt CONTRACTOR M/A TEdO
£ /^A £ 8 5 ^2 * "^ X^L '^ ^y 5 ^ * 2 ^ ^ /^A_ / 7" 5 f^QG/^1 ^
iA/ATFn,ev/ci AMP, n ATE •« '6>-& '6^.6.; 5 ~ 24 -?? START 5-Z-4--8*? FINISH 5-^4~^9 , nr,r;FR N- PEMMOCK
*~
O ^
u [J7
EJ
a c
Qa>
O

-
5 -

-
/O -

"

-
15 -
•?n


"


-

25 — |


-
-
SAMPLE

FERVAL
?












20



22.

Z4


Z6

29


PE AND
JMBER
















-1


S-2

-3


s-t


m
O
S'-















O


1.3

0-5


1.2.

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
fN)















6-6-//-/0
,
(//J
4-f- /Z-/4

II -IS- 13- 12.
(Z6)

8-/4-/7-Z2
(30

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL

j ^

7

Au^i£fr £-uTT)'065 FR£N\ S " to 5
CLAV oa.c3e.r~ O-|OI*\IM\J*>^ CAv>6
^' > r*re't>

Au^t?. duTTi^6y5 F-\?o»n lo is .
Black oilvi siury -S^MO , 3^a^/

J 1
tr^^r."-*-":
-

NO R.£O3V£«.^


Pooe.u^-ii,i2AOE.O SANJD , •fin*, wi^lo
12JS;7?' wK ^' ^ •
As ABoVE- ^>P)


POOE.L.V - dl^ADE-D SA>^D? T^C. TO tried..
browM. \we-Tj acA^e. (5>r^
B-o. vA- @. l&' '


MBOLIC
)G
«OJ
























COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE,
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Le.ve.1 
-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                   BORING NUMBER
                                                                                           SHEET   I    OF
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT   ^T 5 n
                                                                          PHASE: J LAMPFILU
ELEVATION	
DRILLING METHOD AND			
WATER LEVEL AND mxTC~)k-4 ' b'% &- '  5~Z4-S? START 5-Z4'
	 DRILLING r-DNTRACTOH    MA
CM£  S><50  •  + y+"  hi- 5. .
                                                                '   Z"  SPLIT
                                                               . FINISH.
                                                                                     ,r>««PH  A/.
*{~
ai
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O
5 -
10 -

15 -





^~
-


25 -


_,
INTERVA
)4


jfe

18

io

2Z

Z4


SAMPLE
o
15


S-'


s-z

s-i

5-4

5-5



er
RECOVE
(FT)


0.8


0.2

0.5

/.O

;,o


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(HI

/--I. 4.— f

^
1-i-is->VVj
a\^"b^ 2.«p«.r O.2.' : SILT'V SAWDj b)acK_, 6\l^
Bottorvi o.to' '• PCOK.VS - ^R-^beo SMMO -
wiTH CigAVfi-i-j qra^ , wie-tj ^no'S*- (^fi
AS AftnuE. (spj Some, paper
m ' i I
AS ABOVE. CSP) , except browm

A^ Aftowt C^f2> with ^ O.i t^ick
Aevvst oi black 4 coir«€, 5a>^l
POOR.US- ^RADt^ SAJOO, Jf-me, broton
"*> *^; ^^ ^^

'

o
O
CD
 ioo%. £vai.ua^. &M^
illovO to vent T^«r Xi VlOUV/
K.esuwe eifAlitvi unafir head -

_
• i . ^
Q

GH-KB-ZL-or- ie>'- -L-L'


-


-
~
                                                                                              REV 7/88 FORM D1586

-------
   ' /•/'
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                        G,LO
BORING NUMBER



  f^B 2-7
                         SHEET
                                                                                                       I   OF  /
                                                                SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT   G, j  H   LAMDFlLl-
ELEVATION	 nBII I IMP! CONTRACTOR    MA TEC.Q	



DRILLING METHOD AND POI MPMPMT   CMS  8SO-.   4-^ "  tf. 3. 4 .  '   Z"  SPLl T  S^bOA/S




WATER LEVEL AND DATE .
                               *'.-  5-Z5-& START
. FINISH   5-2.5
                           A/.
*-
III w
I<
Ott
0
-

s -

-
10 -
/5 -
-

Zo -

-

.
£-





SAMPLE
<
INTEHV








«

2/


23

25

27

29

°£
uj £
ti










s-i

5-2

S-3

5-4


5-5

£
6e










0.2-

/.o

l.o

1.2


/.+

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS

6"-6"-6"
(Nl









3-3- ^ - 1
(12.)
/0-IO-IO-/Z


6-6-8-8

7-6-5-5
(IIJ
£-14-22-34
(3«

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME, COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
AufijE*. CUTTIES F«ON\ 0-15'
^r^^Jir^0""^-

_

-
-
.

Peoe_uV - &*^AP£.P 5A^ D W G,(2JV^EL .,
bla.c.k, yjer^ oi\w ^>P5 — i
Pooeo-^ - c, ?j>ioeo SA^P, -fine, l»Wk
on "Vop Va 4riV *^" feoTVow^ wt'V) W<4 . -
^ew^e. (6p 5
AS ABovE (t>P)


At> ABOVE (.5P)


/Vb ABovt C^P)
'
B.C. H. & 2.1 '

0
3
O
D
>o
M -1





















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS,
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Uvel fi.
UJi^^OfT *S><5.^PPVV^. •
V^LpOf^ or QUA! G.m\T\€o TTOw\ -
Kd«. 64'. LEU= 3%. P*t_
w4rev \*\ V)o\t iv^di CffxiTinW
Ol^|ll\*\d .
H it cA'*TTOe'^IOM & 4. 5 .
-
-
d* e b U-e. D.

—

qH-^-a7-0): 2l' - 26' '



G,H-RB- 21-02.', Vb1'1^'




                                                                                                  REV 7/86 FORM 01586

-------
f».•*',
                                        PROJECT NUMBER
                                          G,LO
                                                                       BORING NUMBER
                                                                         R.618
SHEET   /   OF  /
                                                                  SOIL BORING LOG
                                                                              PHASE X
ELEVATION .
                                           , non i iKin r.nMTRAf.TDR    MA TELC.O
CU.CVM I 1WI1            - -  _ __T_-IT _               Ljn I UL-iniU ^Wlt I nr^W I VJ n    -  • * i • ^~- ••• •—•-	
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT   C/V>£  8SO «.  4- ^ /x  >/. 5, >4 . *   2." SPLlT

WATER LEVEL AND DATE  ** ^°'   j  5"3°"fi>^  START  5-2.fe-&9    FINISH  5 - 3Q- 8?
                                                                                          LOGGER
IE
UI Hi
X <
a. cc
Oca
O


5-
yo -


_
15 -


-
2.0 -



-
2.5

"

.
-
SAMPLE
<
CC
UJ
t—










/7

n


23


Z5


27

|
i.
** m
OL S
KZ











s-i
S-2.

S-3

5-4


S-5



cr
UJ

op
St











O.ft
o.&

O

1.0






STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS

6"-6"-6"
(N)











z$-i&- is-n
(3O
I7-I5-/7-/3
IS-IO-ll-IS
(Zl)
It -IZ- 15-12.


1-1-I+-H
(2.2.)



SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL

t
AoCiE-fc. COTTlnXij S f&irn O - S :
E>fOLan TO bl^k SIL.TV ^^I^D **/ <«pji\/n.
w>^*i piper 3^
toooa ^.wi p^>Vic
-

PooR.1.^ -GiBADEO SAMO ^/OiPAVE,!-
black, KV>O>%T afUl^t (SP^
ASASovE (§P^; exctpV Jle-bs ara.vel
VI

MO P.FC.<>V EgV

Uppey O.S' POOVU.'/- ^RADE.0 -SftWO, CMrbC
klatk, wtVj vrit^i, d&v\^e. , "tWn TI^C.
iwl V>roto" (j>PD
PoO^-U>J -GiPADE.D SANJD) 4 Vn*. TO I^CO- ^
bfOw>n, uet, w>e6€. (^PJ

5.0. >V. <2 ^7'.

o
ED
SO
f> >nj.
-


.
-


G(H-fcB-z^-oi-. n - xi

0
LEL - |OO /0 . £vacuak. ivxi
VtrtT

G,H-R.B-i1--ol-- W- 2.5 ' .




.

                                                                                                     REV 7/86  FORMO1586

-------
nf.v.Kiiim
                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                         G,LO
                                                                      BORING NUMBER
                        SHEET
                                    OF
                                                                 SOIL BORING LOG
                                                                  LOCATION.
                                                                                       OTT  I^VNDFIl-U
ELEVATION



DRILLING
                                           DRILLING r.f>NTRARTOR    MA T££Q
                                       85O
2/x  SPLIT  5/=boA/5
WATER LEVEL AND DATE NJT MgA-SUR.£.I>
                                               START
                                                      7" 6-
                                                                    FINISH
     7-7-
                                                                                         ,nr.r,PB
                           T.
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
O
5 -
-
ro -
IS -
zo -
-


30
SAMPLE
INTERVAL









TYPE AND
NUMBER









RECOVERY
(FT)









STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)









SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
„ I' Of SILTVSANP, +V*n ~ 1' of
PooCL*/- 6|RJQD£D PIM£. SAND WITH
G,RAveu ^TOWO
AycjC-K. CurrtN<^s
^fa.«>s - ppt





' u"""'~" ;
V .
-
-
-


N/

SYMBOLIC
LOG









COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE,
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
.' r<31*3
-
-
-
-
-

.

                                                                                                   REV 7/88 FORMO1SB8

-------
                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                     BORING NUMBER
                                                                                             SHEET
                                                                                                     2.  OF
                                                                SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT_
             I  H
                                                                . LOCATION.
                                              J3T
ELEVATION	

DRILLING METHOD AND EOUIPMENT_
WATER LEVEL AND DATE  AJoT MEASURE/!?
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
850  ».  4-^y/  hl-S-
                                                                 MA TEC.O
                                                                          SPLI
                                              START 7- 4 -
                                                                 .FINISH.
                                                         3".
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
3o
35 -
-
-


4o-


*
—

SAMPLE
INTERVAL




39


41

43


TYPE AND
NUMBER






s-i


5-2


RECOVERY
(FT)






1-8





STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)





10 -15- /5"-/f
.
^ ^
n-2.t-2.i-4i
(50


SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
Ao<^E)?. (coNfO

\


SANt>V s"-Tj Y^
i 1

tf> ABOVE (.ML.^ }
-
-
/
-

(MIO
-

u>. HI ^ 3"+htck
levs-5^ o'f silfy •sA»vJ
B.O.H. v> of r«-£w.s«. <£ -vj 2>8'. -


—
<^H- R.U-29-OI : 39 --^S


^
-
                                                                                                 REV 7/86  FORM 01586

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                      BORING NUMBER
                                       R.W30
                                                                                            SHEET   I    OF  |
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
ELEVATION.
                                          DRILLING CONTRACTOR
                                  LOCATION
                                  MA
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE  A/°T
CMg  8SO  •;
                                                                       "
                                                                         SPLIT
              .START
                      C, - 9-
. FINISH.
* »
h
ui •.•
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O
/o -
IB -

Zo-








!
.j
INTERVA


Zl

Z3


Z5

27

SAMPLE
Q
oil


3-1

5-Z

S-3


S-4


>
o^


1-7

l-tt

1-5


2.0

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N>

13-11- II-I4»
(2Z>
i-n-u-ii
(233
?2
At. ABOVE C.'SP)

Upper- I' A^ ABOVE , tVi(

•go. H. ^, Z7 '
i

o
o
CD
>o
at -i











COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS,
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Le.ve.1 d.
DrilJ fhroc^ilo -fill 2on£
V •
(A^lTnOi/T S^fwoilvvf .









See. u>ell c^^^t'rwc.'Hfl^
* 0 ^^ "
                                                                                                 REV 7/86 FORM 01586

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                   BORING NUMBER
                                                                                           SHEET
                                                                                                   /   OF /
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                                                               LOCATION.
ELEVATION	



DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.



WATER LEVEL AND DATE   '3	_
                                         . DRILLING CONTRACTOR    M/A TEO.Q
                                      850
  . A.  -   2/x  SPLIT 5/=boA/5
                                  C-Z2-87  START
. -8?
                                                                 F1NISH
                                                                                      inr.npp
A/.
*~
St
Ul 1.1
DEPTH B
8URFACI
O
3 -

lo -

•



IK
'3

Zo -

25



_i
INTERVA


,,


13


IS

n



Z
(E
ill
O
K


l.o

l-l


I-T

!.(,



7 A
'

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
(N)

Z-5-fe-
(23^

^-3-4-?

(73

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
P°e>e.l^ -(^KADeP COAR-*,£ S*WD,
Y,t.««, we.t; we ABOVE. (^P^ H>en
PooKLV- CJEADE.D FiME. SA(^D bro^v^ , -
vo«.V mt«l . «i«*vs,«. .
Upper o.B' A^ ABovt (^>P} t^itn fto NBovC. C%?^ / 1-Vi-tvi
SIUT^ CI_A>/ 3rAw , v>j«-t^ -fivw (^ML-CL^

•

u
SYMBOl
LOG
















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Lj£V£.\ D



-




.

-



•3
                                                                                               REV 7/86  FORM D1586

-------
                        PROJECT NUMBER

                         G,Lo  6,551.1.
                                                     BORING NUMBER
                                                                             SHEET
                                                                   OF /
                                                 SOIL BORING LOG
4 H  LAUDF/LL.
PROJECT	

ELEVATION	

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.

WATER LEVEL AND DATE N°T ^^^^^
                           . DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
                                                 LOCATION	
                                                  MATE.OO
S5O '.
                                              j" Sf>i->T- g/'OOV -  3"S//£lgy
                               START
                                                   FINISH
                                     7- 6 -
                                                                       . nr,r,pp
                                                                                I-
*,-
DEPTH BELO
SURFACE (FT
0
7 K
* 0
3o-
-
35-
-
4-Q —




45-


SAMPLE
INTERVAL

tf
31
34
3fe
39
I-/
•fz
44
44-

TYPE AND
NUMBER


S-l

s-z

5-3
S-f
ST-5
5-4,

RECOVERY
(FT)


2-0

1-1

0
1.5
/•8
1.6

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)


9-/S-Z3-2Z
(^/;

3-&-&->/
C«J

3-4-6-/4
(7;
2--1-- wEl^

JnJTtE.L«H ER£.D 'Slt-T A WO UEAfO Cu«V }
qr&^ qi-d*,, weT,
*Wf«- C^
A-i ABOVE: CCO

B.O.M. e. 4fe'
1
SYMBOLIC
LOG
•0

COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
L«.veJ t> .
Dr.'l) from 0-29'
to \HiioUT *4i~pl>««[ -
.
pp- 2,15, B.6 TSF
ppr 2.o r^F
After Z«ro ire£jv«A.v , redrivC
r^Mu ^» * 4. .? ' "~ *
SPOOTi TT«w\ *& - tl .
pp= 3.2.5 T<>f ( "> sitO .
Po - O.5 T"*>P
rr


^e well Cj^-sfr>\x.T1irn
^(W^vx.
vi
                                                                                 REV 7/86  FORMO1586

-------
^_
£»'^^/J//U
^™
PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER
SOIL BORING
/*" tf ^V / A A/ O t~ 1 1— L ^*» * i TAJ
PRO IPf^T ~^T *t f* ^—^\ »v fc^ / / ^ #* 1 f}f* ATIOM *«*O U 1 rf
PI FVATION OPII 1 INR CONTRACTOR MA TEC.O
npii i iwn^PTHnniNnFOiiiPMPWT C.M£ 85O • -MATPQ I CUPI AMR OATP A/oT MEASURED START 6-28-8"? p|NISH 6 " 28 ~ <
SHEET / OF /
LOG
0/= C-AfJAL.

5PooA/5
-S/ | /-./^/-CD ^ ' 'l^^fAJtCfcJ^

O
»s
a c
S3
o
-
5 -
10 -
15 -
-
Zo


SAMPLE

cr
LU




//
14-
tl,
It
Zo



Is
Q. ^
£z



s-/

S-2

S-3



cr
tu
° P
at



,k

/.-f

..5


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)




/3-Z5-30-3I
(55)

J';To7'"

/9 -27-29-^
(50


SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL

See PVut*. 3L Ri W\tws loa-b
O ^
-
Pooft-l-S -Ci E^O£O ^//V£ ^AA^O, bfAfitn

Pe>o£Li-tjiSAf>C» SAWD v'/'Sit-T, ir&i
wef j v. oe*is«. pP-5M )
-
0 S)t-TV 'SAMP, d r^y , lufi^ I/, de*\<>4^
B.O.H. fi. 20'



u
o
a)
2 O
B>_l









COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Lei/d I>
-
-
.
q-Mm-a..^- -
-
-
^e ^ell^^.c^ _
^
REV 7/86  FORMD1586

-------
I*!?,': HUH
^~
PROJECT NUMBER
G,LO (eSStot .fl.fl
BORING NUMBER
CjM ^B SHEET
1 OF /
SOIL BORING LOG
PRO.IFCT G i H LAUDFILL
Fl FVATION _ nPII 1 INin nONTRAr.TOR
npn i iNfiMF-mnn Awn FDI IIPMFNT C/V\£ 85O - 4- /+ " H. 5. /
WUATCOIPV/P! AMnnATC A/o r M EA S v K. £J> START 6 -17- "8^
i nr.ATinN 5ow
MA TEC.O
<\. • 2/x SPLi
' FINISH 6-27'
TH OF CAMAL.

T SPooriS
•*? ,nr,r,FR ^ H



EiVlCKE-
* —
as
il
UI3
On
O

5 -
-

In —

-



15-
-
2.0-
-

.1
INTERVA
4-

<*
9


/(
1 -2
1 O
14

l<*
/?
2.1

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBER


5-1


e-7

5-3


0 A
o-4

3-5


>
oc
RECOVE
(FT)


0.8


i n
!• O
1-5



i, 1



STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

/ -a. 5-c
(133


t -II- 1^—15
(Z5? .
7-12.- 14-17
(2*5


-r-14-ii-iC,
(35;

2-3-^-3
C^

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
\AlELU- GiBADED SM\)I? w/«iKAVE.L . I*
lV ma*, o^iewwl siee ( Mortt-^ KM««i. -
4e*vs€. , p««iV»l^ fill ?o\j ciwafi dikt
§W3
l/Pp4.T O'Z. n* "oOvt IbwJ VAjxrn oocrv oil •
4VfeM PoofeL1-61K-AQE.D SwMD w/ SIV-T,
•fme > bro«J»i cJli"^"1^ "^ 3r6^ 7 w*-! >
.-.-.I /io..^/3 /iSP-^M ^
A5 A&ove.(^P-*i*Ofy*lm^To -SII-TV
C,AfOO A.V 4^ A o4*  o

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                 BORING NUMBER

                                                                        t+A
                                                                                        SHEET
                                                                                                 /  OF  I
                                                             SOIL BORING LOG
ELEVATION.
                                        npn i IMP; r.niMTRAfrrnR
                                                             mr.ATinM  -3 3 MI»-£
                                                             /MAreco
                                                                                     TuST £.  OF gyAN
DRILLING METHOD AND POM.PMEMT

WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                             CM& 5SO '.  <* '4 "  H. S. A.  '.  **  S?U|T
                                            START  7 ~ 14-89
                                                               FINISH
                                                                                  -LOGGER.

2t
UI3
Q ce
O
-


-

5




• -
15-

-

_,
INTERVA
O

Z

4

*

3

10


it

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBER

s-i


5-2.

5-3
5-4

S-5


5-t



oc
RECOVE
(FT)

1.1


M

1 ' V
I ' Iff

t


) &


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-€"-6"
IN)
7-7-5-4
/
^
U-fl-7-7
C's^
7--8-//-/Z
(11)
5-8-/0-Af
(J6)
(4-IZ-I3-IS
(Z5^

l5-Jt-29
/., E-
(45?

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
FILL : WELL- GRADED SAAJD WITH-
G.ZAVEL. bro«»l Jv\ertf- weA .Ae*w (Su)T

FlV-U! S'Uf/ S>yOO , brovon, kwoi-.Vj
Samt C.I&J inii 4^dV&l
v>/s.i-v.- G^RJ^O£D SKNID. 5otnt Ti*v4
a ri-^tl . brou>»i . *v\ortf' , we^i, Q^i^g, ft»>3
A^> ABoVE C^1*') 41-ctpV vott"

A^> ABOVE (sw)

-

(5P>
L

o
o
So
52












e.


COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
LtMtl D



-




C,tf- qH)4-fy- o 1 ; Q'-IO1 -

-
-

See. vMtH C
-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                      G,LO
                                                                  BORING NUMBER
                                                                       ISC
                                                                                         SHEET
                                                         /  OF  3
                                                             SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
ELEVATION.
DRILLING METHOD AND EO.MPMEK.T   CHE  75".  «f V

WATER LEVEL AND DATE M»T M £A * »£.££>
DRILLING CONTRACTOR
   "-"  i-t S.A.  AfJD
                                                              LOCATION Z3 MILE KD. ~ I MILE.  VJ. OF
                                                              MA TECO
                                                                                                           P£>.
                                            START   7'/7- 39
                                                               FINISH
                                                                                    , nnr.ca

o t
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O
5 -
10 -

1 TZ _
'5


2
-
_

-
3o "

_,
INTERVA
13-5

15



2.O
23.5

25
28.5
3o
SAMPLE
Q_
I-H>- 30

^

4-3-0
(J)

1^-15-4-1
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
WELL-GRADED 5AMD */ C,KAV/£L , ^2.°%
•f wt qvd.vel . brovjy>, \n^} weo 4V*^>j \

of -f int Sand
POOP.LV -6,PAO£O FiME. sA-tJCi, aravj .
WfcTj Jloo^. (?f

-


-
-
                                                                                             REV 7/86  FORMD1586

-------
                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                      BORING NUMBER
                                                                          I5C,
                                                                                               SHEET
                                                                                                           OF
                                                                 SOIL BORING LOG
                                       23 MILE
                                                                                            / M)L£  W.  OF
ELEVATION .
DRILLING METHOD AND PO.MPMPK.T

WATER LEVEL AND DATE
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR
 75-   4^" H.S./>. •
           START   7-/?-*»
                                                                   FINISH
                                                                                         , nr.r,FP
                                                                                                  2., P/)lM£g.
* —
DEPTH BELO
SURFACE (FT
JO
O3
-
45 -
So -
60
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
33.S
35
35.5
37-5
38.5
40
43.5
45-5

•"f-9.5
53.5
55
58. S
bo
TYPE AND
NUMBER

5-5

sr-t,

s-7

57-8

S-9

a-,o

5-,,
RECOVERY
(FT)

1.5

O

o.5

,3

0.6

/./

A4
STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

3-6- /4

^

s(«/*

^

4-6- bo/2"

7>"o"r

//-2I- 19
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
LEAN) C.L.AV flfAv \»i*-T V. shff V.

NO &£COV El*-^ po^4\^a^ po^^*1"^ ov\
rocl<
SiuTY CLA^/. Afa>j > wie-V, ha.^d

^r^S j vocK sV^ff (j^*-)
Oppe.r O.i' LEAKJ Cl-A'/ . ^ 5% fW ^rave.) ,

§jujV SA.MD , ~io'/0SilT-, ^ra^ we.t,
ae^e. (SM^ .
•t-lm c»a«, ^«Am-i - +LJ SIUT^ CLAV, -

5)i.ry cLAi, /ract^rave/, ?riy, H«)i^
WJ (w/.-^;
SYMBOLIC
LOG


COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
pp= 3.5, i.75 T6F
SCT" (o' c.aA\r\a \rarr\ surfer
H 34'. £jfom.t- in-pWe; "
a.llt>io to ser-vp overn\*V»T''-
' 0
uyn ^ n^
tl f 1 , p
Some, banirntif stroK€5 °T
S-7 were. < 3o".
pp- 45 Tt>f ( W S-7) -

,
^Z d»'^\er Tol**. 30"
pp > 4.5 "n>F
                                                                                                   REV 7/86  FORM 01586

-------
t »:M nun
PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER
(jiff 6554,1. FI. ?! (^H ISC
SHEET 3 OF 3
SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT
          G,<- /y
                                                               mr.A-nnM
-23
KD. -u /
                                                    U/. o/=
ELEVATION .
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.
                                      	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR_
                                       75.   4^"  M3.A.  AND
WATER LEVEL AND DATE
START  7-./7-3>9   FINISH   7- '8 -87-
                                                                                     mnnca
                                                                                              /..
Jp
uiHT
DEPTH B
SURFACI
-

Ac



70 -


75 -
.

-
etc


_j
INTERVA
63.5

65
48.5

69.5
73.5

74-5
76.5

/T/3

^

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF


5-12.


IJ


S-M-

S-IS


5-11,


.EC
RECOVE
(FT)


1.0

_
'


°'^

6.8


0.5

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

24-24-37


60/6"
v ^ ^<5^

"/o/^, "
C^ 7o)

/fc-/l7-/oe/2


1%

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
SAWOy S\V-T, •« 5o% siH t -i-raxe.
9>«e afAMt) , ar^'j vott> hard (MU)
-
" S)U-T; ?rd7> wtT' ^^ CM*-">

-
PoofeL.^ -G^Rj^DED plfOC- ^AMOj *JtiN J
vueV v. ^..5 T"^ p

-


-
-

-

See. vuell c-oi\-si~r\icJ~fc>n
a^r m.
                                                                                               REV 7/86  FORM 01586

-------
                                  PROJECT NUMBER
                                   qto  6 55 6 J.
BORING NUMBER

  C,H 11 6
SHEET
          OF
                                                         SOIL BORING LOG
ELEVATION.
                                      n«" ' '"" rnNTHAr.TDR
                                                        . LOCATION _
                                                         IMATE.CO
                                                                   6££S£  o/i.
                                55O-,
WATER LEVEL AND DATE
% —
DEPTH BELO
SURFACE (FT
O
5 -
-
I r\
IK

2.0 -
25-
3o
5.5' b.a.s. •, 7-I3-&9 START 7-13-tf? F.NISH 7-13-%"? , nr,r,PR L- PALMER.

SAMPLE
INTERVAL


-8
IO

 - 3o- 35

"(to33

(72.")


SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
RsofJU-y- QRAT>£t> FINE ^Awfcj browvi,
)
AS Above C=p.> except wtt, 3" sea*v>
ofmed.^ 44nd
WE-LU- C^PAOED SA*^O bra ton, WC-t
trace, f int. 4 five) (Sw/3
Upper I' A'i ABovt (S*O , Httvi
Poopu>| -ED FlKJEL SMOD, brourvi,
A5 ABOVE (SP)


4,
A^> ABOVE, ^p^

i

SYMBOLIC
LOG

COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Leve. \ D .
-

-
-
•
-
                                                                                      REV 7/86 FORMO1586

-------
ss
Hlf'lilM

PROJECT NUMBER
GJLO i554l. FJ.FI
BORING NUMBER
qHH6 SHEET 2-
OF 2.
SOIL BORING LOG
PRO.iPrT RII 1 IN« rnNTBArTDB
ppn i iMrt MPTMnnaMnprv'iPMFNT £ME 55 O ^ *+/+" U.S. A, •
,nrAT1nM BEE&£ OIL. GoMPAN/V
MATECO
2." 'SPLIT- 'S?OT5fJ



WATER LEVEL AND DATE
*5.5 b.^.-.  7-13-6?    START  7-13-??
                                                                  FINISH
                                                                                      .LOGGER.
                                                                                                  PALME*.
4^.
DEPTH BELO
SURFACE (FT
30
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
31.5

TYPE AND
NUMBER
5-7

RECOVERY
(FT)
2.0

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
1-7-IZ-Z.o

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
Ufper 1' AS ABOVE (SP3, -f+ICO SILT/SAND,
4ra^, met ,. -w 3o'/o sf^ (SMD
B.o.H. e. 31.5 '

SYMBOLIC
LOG


COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-
Set totl\ Cffin^ fnxitifrvi
                                                                                                 REV 7/86 FORM O1586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                       G,LO 4551/.f I.
                                                                  BORING NUMBER
     2.7 A
                       SHEET
                                  OF
                                                             SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                                                                         AUTO  S*LVA$£,
ELEVATION .
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.
                              C/v\£
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
 8SO  •  4-*4-" //. S.
                                                              MA TEdO
2X/ SPLIT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE.
                                            START
                                                               F1NISH
*t~
s£
Hi ...
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O

5 -
-

10 —





_J
INTERVA


6
9

/,

13


SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEP


s-i


S-2

5-3



>
cc
UJ
O
8P
it.


o.t,


1.4

hi


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(Nl

10-12-%-")
(20

3-5-4-7
(9)
3-k-lt- 9
(/O


SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
~
Poo|tLV-CiftAI>E-D F)M£ §/s,Mp , bronrn
 o
01 -1










COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
/.eve; O-


-
' '



-
See. u»ell con'sfvuc.-hirv)
O "^
                                                                                             REV 7/86 FORM O1586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                       G,LO
                                                                   BORING NUMBER
                                                                    Q//2-86
                                                                                           SHEET
/   OF  2.
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
Ppo,Pr.T   G i H
                                                                         A VTO
ELEVATION .
                                         DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
                                                               MA
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                              C/v\£  850 •
                                                      tf.S.A. '   2."  SPLIT  S/=boA/S
                                            START
                                                                . FINISH.
                                                                                    .LOGGER.
                                                                                             T.

111 rrr
DEPTH B
SURFACf
0

5 -
-

10




15 -
-

to -
-

25-

3o

_j
INTEHVA
4

C.
9

„

13
,4

/*


2/
Z4

ZJ.

30
SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBER


S-J


s-z

S-3


S-4


S-5


s-4,

S-7

or
RECOVE
(FT)


/.z.


M

/.o


1.5


I.S


M

0.5
STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"


6-7-6- 7
03)

7- 10-13 -15
(Z2O
4-9-9-H
(/•?:>

/ _j2_ //,-ia
(za;

7-/S-22-i|
C4o;

/b-33-40-fc
(73;

^;ta^"
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
PsofcLN-afcADED FINE SAUD. brawn.
eiv-y , me4.=leM'S€- (^PD ~
-
A5 ABOVE s^p^ e.-ACtp'V \M&"t

PcjoRL^f - (^ RAt>E£> p|NE *A«ND ^/Stl-T
br0«n, wtt,»*d.

5 AS ^BOME (-SP1) firopV C.UMAIWI
Color h> «ra>4  ABovg ^5P) CKC«.pT yd«j

o
o
B
5 2
> o
 _i



















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Level D.

"
-






—
-

—
-


-
G,H-G,H18a-o|: 29'-3o'
                                                                                               REV 7/86 FORM 01586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                  BORING NUMBER
                                                                        2.86
                                                                                         SHEET
                                                                                                     OF
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                                                              LOCATION.
ELEVATION .
                                         DRILLING r.nNTRACTQR    MA TE&Q
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE ^o7"
                              CM£  850
                                                                   Z/x SPLIT  5fboA/5
                                           . START
. FINISH.
                                                                      6-;3- #9
*f-
s£
Ul iu
• o
K U.
a. cc
ui a
o-
oc
RECOVE
(FT)

0.6

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

0-12-li- |5
(24)

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
SAM o^ •5ii-TJ gra-j, voaV, tard (ML.)
B.O.H. fi. 3fo '
i

u
o
o
so
> o
at -j



COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-
-
See toe) I CffYvsfroctifrTi
o awx '
                                                                                             REV 7/86  FORMD1586

-------
jSS
—
PROJECT NUMBER
G,LO 655k/.
Fl
. FI

BORING NUMBER
SHEET
f OF Z
SOIL BORING LOG
P«n,PrT G 2 H LANDFILL
PI PVATION noil
PHII i iwrtMPTHnn ANnpnniPMPNT CN\E. SSOjJ
VUATPQ i PUPI AMODATP ~7.O \},a.$.- "7-8-S?


.LING CONTRACT
4- '4- " //-
START 7
-8-

rop
S.x».
- 89
LOC
AV
AT,™ £/vzy/v£s
^r^co
', 2" SPLIT
FINISH 7~ 9

5 POO A/ -
OF AMERICA


3" SttELBV

TUBE.
-89 „„„ ^-- Pfti-^EK.
" ' \ nnnpB
*—
DEPTH BELO
SURFACE (FT
O
-
£ -
-
In
/O
-

15 -
2.0 -
25 -J

3o
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
O
2
f
6
,
Jo
It
1 +
14.5

C?-5
21

ZI..5
27
^

TYPE AND
NUMBER
5-1
s-z
S-3
s-^-
S-5

5-4,

S-7

S-8

s-,

S-io

RECOVERY
j.«-?

(no

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
Uoo^r O.L1 ToPSoiL. , the.* WELL-

^elu-^otp swoD -/C.PAVEL -W
V^f*-^ to 1* "Tin. ob«erve4 site.^ "brown/
AS ABOV& CSW)
W&UU- ^e.NDEO 5ht^D» "MO"/,, JrAv^;
AS ABOVE (.5W)
-
OPCMK- 0.3' SI LTV CLAN brow* To ari>)
MartV j v.tHH , "50% Tin?- SS'vl i^
PoceU- GRADED F)M£ SANO , ^ra^ , \Ntt,

wti^ v, 4e*»^e. (SP)
.,, -
A5 ABOVE. C^O

//
AS ABOVE (.5*0



SYMBOLIC
LOG



COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Leve.1 D

-

-
pp- 3.5 TSF
•
-
	
G,H-^HZ^C-Ol '- 2
-------
^JH,
{GttsKnM

PROJECT NUMBER
QLo 4.5541. FI. FJ
BORING NUMBER
SOIL BORING
PROJECT G. 4 H LANDFILL.
PI PUATION npn i iMfsrnwTBArTnp 	 '^A
AT.ON EKJ£-y>
TBCO
n»,,,,M«uPTHnn«,nc«,HDU«n- ^ME 55O-. **. " H-S- A. ', 2" SPUT" SPOON)-.
UUATCQICUCI AMnnATC ~7.0 lf^.4.- l-ft-fc^ START I'S'S^ FINISH 7-?-9'
SHEET 2. op 2.
LOG
-1E5 OF AMERICA

3" SHELS-y ToB£
\ ,nr,r,pp L. PALJVIte.
*~
o t
ui nr
II
111 3
Qfl)
30
-_

-

4O -
-
45 -


-


bo

_,
INTERVA
34.5

3

UT/ CLAV ^^^i >»*> ^^ ^^ S^uH CLAV, varved , i?.r4s . vott . 5f>ff . 6.0. H. (» So' i u o ID so >• o in -i COMMENTS DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE. DRILLING FLUID LOSS. TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION - ,t:^_>,V pps Z.o T"5F — • pp= 3.5 T5F - ppi ?.S j 3,i5, Z.T5 TSF See, votll c\ REV 7/86 FORM 01586


-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                        G,LO
                                                                     BORING NUMBER
                                                               SHEET
                                                                           OF
                                                                SOIL BORING LOG
ELEVATION .
           DRILLING nONTRACTOR    MA TEC.Q
CMg  Q<5O'.
DRILLING METHOD AND Pn, MP^PMT



WATER LEVEL AND DATE ^°T A?£ASUg.£.P
                                                        tf.S.A. •   2.
               START
                      7- 9-59
                                   . FINISH.
                                                                                       .LOGGER.
if
§1
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O

5 -
-

10 -


-
15 -

io -




<5

30

_J
INTERVA
4

fr


,/
,1

,+


z/

23

25

Z7

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF


s-|


5-1


5-3


S-4

5-5

-6

S-7


>
RECOVE
(FT)


1.3


/.«


/.o


/./

0.9

/./

/.I

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
fN)

a i-»_ 1C. 17
7- 1 1 IS If,
(30

SO
3«) - eo/^ •/
(?54iD
4-n-2t-3i
(f«

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
\MEI_V.- OI&AOE.D SAWD / ^JEAV&L,,
SLLib^wi^'dv i o l*oov^o£o % ^v\<\K)* Oiro L*J M 	
i S W ^
•
« PooW-1- fl^AOeo MEDIUM SAMDj T^acc.
favc\, I^V br.wo (SP^

R>ofcLN- GEADCCi F)NE SA^O, -^i^ViV
bi"ou3o to JliwV>V ora« . (5p^
o o ; v.
-
A6 A&OVE (.5P) extept gra^

At> ABOVE C^P>

A* A60VE (5P)

5AlOD^ S'lLT, <}ra>| , Moi-^t . v. •Stiff
(MlO
8.0. H. ~
-

"





~
S;d we// &ffH$}rtsc'h0nj
i *
o /r?'
                                                                                                  REV 7/86  FORM 01586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                              BORING NUMBER

                                    31  d
                                                                                          SHEET
                                                                                                     OF
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
          G, 4 H
ELEVATION .
DRILLING METHOD AND PP. MOMPK.T

WATER LEVEL AND DATE
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
 sco •  -4-^"  >/. s.
                                                                   2 /X  S PL t T
                                             START
              7-7-?9
                                                                RN|SH
                                                                        7" 7-5?
                                                                                    LOGGER
9
si
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O
s -


-

15 -




2o -
_


25-


3o

-i
INTEHVA


IO
14-

,5

17
/9

H

23
Z4

24,
21

SAMPLE
a
TYPE AN
NUMBEF


5-I


S-l

S-3


S-4
5-5


•?-*




ff-
RECOVE
(FT)


0. |


/.3




o.z
/. "5






STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
fN)

4-5-IO-/0
(js;>

^-^-^-^
('4-3
7-6-10-lz.
(18)

7-8-7-/Z
(/S^
9-/y- /»-23
^J

2<1-Z3-4S-59
(^^


SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
Upper 3' SAlOD AMP ^R-fcVEL, f^en
FIU\- '• SAiOD Kv»«<«i WITH REFvSEL
sV^e^ \»»d*k
-
LEAiJ CLAO/, black, Moi-bt, sf,ff (CL)
—
•5AMDV SILT, dark 4rAy (ML-)


A5 ABOVC. (MU)

A'i ABOVE CML)


*' A6 A60VE. (p\i-) -

i
SEE NEXT 5HEE.T

U
O
ffl
>o
at -i


















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-


-

•"





-


M-Wie-oi •• ^+'-^<0l -

-

                                                                                              REV 7/86 FORM D1586

-------
                                    PROJECT NUMBER
                                     G|LO
                      BORING NUMBER
                                             SHEET
                                                        OF
                                                            SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                  L.AfJDFlL.1-
ELEVATION.
                                        DRILLING CONTRACTOR
                                                             LOCATION
                                                             MA
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE  M>T
                             CMg  850  -.  +*/+" tf.S.A.  •  Z"  SPLIT 5/=bQA/S
START
                   . FINISH.
                          7-7-??
                                                                                 .LOGGER.
*.—
s£
III ...
DEPTH B
8URFACI
3o
-
35-
-
4o-
-
45-
-
5o-
-
55-

_j
INTERVA
3/
34
35.5
39
4/
44
4t
4^
£•/
53

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF
5-7

5-8

s-1

s-/o

s-n
5T-IZ


>
flC
RECOVE
(FT)
1-1

1.5

1-7

3,0




STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)
&-7-7-/0
(/*:>

I5-Z«-5I
(79)

7-4-S-IZ
(14^

4-7-7-9
(I4P

t-n-is"-^
(m
Pv)4H

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
AS ABOVE (ML)
-
As ABOVE (ML)
-
AS AflovE. (ML) , ex^f- ^ixe wtll
rouniad «r4*t\ K> KI" man. otaerw-d -
site

At> ABOVE (ML}

45 4BOVE (I>IL)

B.o. H. & 53'

u
SYMBOL
LOG











COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION

-
-
'-
-
-
-
-
^^-<}AJ3JC-02- 4?'-5/' _
-
See. vot/l dent>fruchrn
diaanm
V ' _
                                                                                            REV 7/86  FORM D1586

-------
                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                         C,LO
BORING NUMBER
 G,H 32.A
                         SHEET
                                    Of
                                                                 SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                                                                  LOCATION.
ELEVATION.
                                           DRILLING r.H    M<•' -

_

See ujf.ll £\1
                                                                                                   REV 7/86 FORMD158S

-------
                                       PROJECT NUMBER
                                        G,LO
                                                                     BORING NUMBER
                                                                                              SHEET
                                                                                                          OF
                                                                 SOIL BORING LOG
Ppo.IPr.T   G I  H
                                                                 .nr.AT.niu
ELEVATION .
                                          . DRILLING r.niMTRAf-.TDR    MA TEtlO
DRILLING METHOD AND pnn.PUPMT



WATER LEVEL AND DATE ^.S
85O
                                                            5,4 .
                                                                           SPLIT
                                              START
                                                                   FINISH
                                                                                        , nr,r,FP

s£
IU ...
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O

5 -



lo

'
-
15 -





Lo
-

-


_,
INTERVA
4-

6

*

/o

/i
/4

/&

/tf

2.0

zt

2.4

SAMPLE
O
TYPE AN
NUMBEF


s-i
c._7


S-3

S-4

S-5

3-fr

S_7
/

s-«

5-9


cr
RECOVE
(FT)


o.S



3.0

U



2.0


*.o

1.1

2.0

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

•=1-11-10- n
(21)
7-25- 26
(5<0
t,-(>-1-)l
Ql)
4-3-4- 2.4
(9)


(51 3
7-l7-2t-35
(4-3)
it-rf-ai-3?
(50
S-^-|2-- |^
w
11-11-12.-^
 P|»0£ SAiOb, V^^J
wef , **R& . clew-se (5P) ~
KJO K.ECOvER'y rock m Tip of •sp»»vn

A5 AB^vE ($P) , ch&n4£<> Color /o 3r<*y

yts/teoff ^^) , troMK1


jSABflU£(*fO

A1> ABOVE (SP)

A1> ABOVE (iP)

Upper o.s' A^> ABOVE Op}. TV\tvi ^Jlufy
SAMO, ^ra-j , wtt, Wied. ^«*\f)e (SM)
Uppe.r o.s' A^> ^bo^/e(5^, tKev\ SIUT
9<-i>), totV. (ML)
Q 7 ^
'

o
o
So
vO
(/> -1





















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Level C,




, ,
; ;
£)H- fl)H i3B-ol' 1-1 ~'l

-
^H- qH3J»B-o3 .- /4'-;ty

.





;
c^/^- ^ ^336- 04 •' Z3 -Z4
"¥"' ;
                                                                                                   REV 7/86 FORM D1586

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
BORING NUMBER
 Q//34-.3
                                                                                            SHEET
                                                                                                        OF /
                                                                SOIL BORING LOG
                                                                mnATinM   SE.Twe.EAJ  LAlO&FtU. ANP
ELEVATION
                                          DRILLING rPNTRACTQR    MA TELC.Q
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.
                        >'  b3*',
                                      850
     SPLI
WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                                              START
                                                                 . FINISH.
                                                                         6-23- -9<=?
                                                                                     -LOGGER.
                          A/.
* 0
k
IU 1.1
DEPTH B
SURFACI
0
-

JO


-



IS




? «





25 —


_i
INTERVA
7

1

II


/3

/e
'CJ

n

'j

i,

i3


Z5

SAMPLE
O
TYPE AN
NUMBEF

S-l


5-2.

5-3


5-4


5-5

b-^

-7

S-6

5-9



x
cc
Ul
8
ig

O


o,-6

l.o


1-7


U

/.z

1,5

0.9

i -a
I'O

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

2-1-7-9
^
s-5-n-n
(it,)
3_£_^._5
/. » >
(JOJ
6-7-20 -3J.
(X7)

3-2.--5-K,
0"3
^-37- s%-
(•87;
ZS-35-5%,
(.-853
+5-So-S>oo)
5-8-H-I4

(I*)

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
No RECOVER.^

PooRxV -G^OtD 3*»4D w/ *UT, W,
brovon^^r^, wttj med. 4em€. (??-*M3
Upper <5.5( 5AMOV «U-T, ^d-j , wtt, -shff
(jv\i_). fhen •Stu.T^C.L.M. ^fi^.wt^,
* £t f yv\L." C.L'N
Uj>oe.r >.3' AS Afeovt ( mt-CU") VV\ev>
sim SMOD, ^viie. ^)

A5 ABOVE CSW)

« PooRL^/- G,RAO£-0 FiME 5^(00, ar^j
weT, v.a«H*fc CSO
s\uTf S^IMD ^<~a>4, io«.V d4*v5<. (.SM)
4^1^ TO SAND-y 5IUT, <^ra>j we.^.
3\\tf* ^MU^
&.O.V4. @ 2.5'

O
SYMBOl
LOG























COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Le.v«.l D.
-




-













-

See. voe.ll CflM^h'otrTiJTv
                                                                                                REV 7/86 FORM D1S86

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                       G,LO
                                                                    BORING NUMBER
                                                  SHEET
                                                              OF
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT,
                   LANDFILL-
                                                               . LOCATION.
ELEVATION .
DRILLING CONTRACTOR    MA TELC.Q
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.
                                      850
              MS. /A.  •   2" SPLIT 5/=boA/5
WATER LEVEL AND DATE .
                                             START
                                                                 FINISH
                                                                         6 - /4-
                                                                                     -LOGGER-
*_
\l
III ...
DEPTH B
SURFACI
0

s -
-

10 -
-

15-



2o




1.5 -



3o

_j
INTERV*


6
9

,/


/^

y»

^

22

24

24

2K
3o
SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF


*-/


5-1


S-3

b-i

s-b
S_/


-7
S-9


5-9
5-10

>-
(T
UJ
O
SP
St


o


o.fr


(.1

1.4

0.7
2-.
,o

.0
I C
Jo

2.0
1-7
STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

H-3o-io-ia
(SCO

14-18- |4- fc>
(3Z)

7-IZ-/3-/4
(25)
14-30-43-4;
(73)
3-«- 2.1-^4,
(29)
6-/8-40-4
(5«)
23-3Z-43-57
(75)
/5-4l'^
(>|06)
X7-3o-3«-3
(4>6)
7-17- Jt-l?
(33)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
KIO pf^oVEfc^ rock \r> Vip »£ •spoon

-
WELL-Gii2ADE.T> S^^P ^/GieAU^1- r°U^al
1^?\5^^Z^ WOWn'lWChj "
-
PooRUN- G|eADED FirOE SAMPv brown ^
We4, a^,e (5f3
- ,A* ABOVE (^?) w.'VK Viet 4ri»t|

AS Afeove (5P)

A-S ABOVE, (tP)

AS ABov£ (SF)

A^> ABovE (sp1)

^ Si tTV ^^QOPj ^^^"i u>€,t de*\^c,(^^)
V (
SitT, airavj , weVj v.-sh f f (lAo

o
o
a
a2
> o
tn -i






















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Le.ve.1 C.


.

~
<^H- <^H35A - * I '• )V~I5;
•from bon>-id pr»-n.
Jo' from ^Hi5B.


1
T





_


8 0\- Z8' o'
Sea i/oeH con^T'ruc^'ioi'v
a\a^fir^.
                                     B.O. H- <£,
                                                                                                REV 7/86  FORMD1588

-------
PROJECT NUMBER
                           BORING NUMBER
                                                 SHEET   /
                                                           OF
                       SOIL BORING LOG
PRmprr & £ // 1-AtiDFlLl. mrATinM /IUTO DISPOSAL V/VR.D
FI PVATION ' npn i iNft r.nNTPAr.rnR M/4 TE.C.O
nRiiMMfiMFTHnnANnpniiiPMFNT C/V^£ 85O-; 4- *4- " M 5. 4 . - 2" SPLIT SPOOLS
W4TFR | FVP| "MO DATE A/oT MCf(t>L>E£3> START 1~5-^ FINISH l'^-^ 1 ORRFH T. MNOA/7~
*~
DEPTH BELO
SURFACE (FT
O
^r

-
/o -

-


-
2_

-


Jo
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
3
5
7
9
II
IZ
14-
Ib
IB
Zo
22
24-
z
Zfe.5
28

TYPE AND
NUMBER

S-l

S-2
s-s

5-4
5-5

«
S-7
S-,
s-9

s-/o

RECOVERY
(FT)

0.4

/•f
0.8

0-7
M

1-3
I.I
l.z-
o.<)

/,o

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
IN)

3-3-3-3

C/83
/I-U- If- lo

(33;
(37;

Io-i4-l4-3o
(2.6?
I8-23-ZI-3Z
i*r( ^
^*"~}0 ~I5~)5
czs;
n-3,-«-,

^c^r

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
Tm^flr**!, J^rW<*m (SP3
As ABOVE. (SP}
PooK-US - Gi(LAOE.D 'SWOO, fme or wtd . .
ft\A\»V orowii ^SP^
^ A*»L ^f) u,^ color c>,4n m "
fo ar^
SILT^ "SAlOD, irav fcM)

AS ABOVE CsrO

AS ABOVE (SM^

S" AS ABOVE. (SM)
AS ABOVE. ($K\)
'

SYMBOLIC
LOG

COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Level b.

-



-
-


-
-






-
-
                                                    REV 7/86 FORMO1586

-------
        PROJECT NUMBER
          G,LO  &55C»/ .fX.fl
                                              BORING NUMBER
                                                                      SHEET
                                                                                 OF
                                          SOIL BORING LOG
ELEVATION	

DRILLING METHOD AND

WATER LEVEL
	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR	
 C/v>£  850 -.  -fr^"  hi- S. A.
                                              TEC.O
                                               2X/ SPLIT 5/=boA/5
A/or M£A5we£j5
START   7-5-g?
                                            FINISH
                                            7-5-*?
                                                                ,nnnp«
*_
of
sir
DEPTH B
SURFACI
30

-
35 -

_,
INTERVA
32.

3+

SAMPLE
0
TYPE AN
NUMBER


5-y/


rr
RECOVE
(FT)




STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
IN)

31 -37- £0-2
(57;

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME, COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
Upp&r )' AS ABOVE (_*'*0 . T^en 5IL.T

i

0
o
CD
SO
>o
ID -1




COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-

.
See. voe_H C.OTISTVJC.TIOVI
'^S
                                                                          REV 7/86  FORM 01586

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                  BORING NUMBER
                                                                                         SHEET
                                                                                                 )   OF  /
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT,
ELEVATION.
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                             	 DRILLING CONTRACTOR	
                              C/N^E  850 -  4Y+"  tf.5.  A.
                                                                   Z" SPLIT 5/=bo/\/5
                                            START
                                                                FINISH
                                                                      6-/4-VI
                                                                                    , QBRPP
><->
si
IU ui
il
UI 3
O(0
o

5 -

-

y/o




/5 -

_i
INTERVA
4

^

•3

10

12.

'+

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBER


S-|

s-z.

S-3
3.4
•>j i
5-5



>-
cc
111
O
£1


0.5

1.5

l.b
1.5




STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

1-IZ-li-IZ
(11>
7-'8-f-'g
(/O
+-(,-1-12
(/+}
S-IO-li-12
(2ii
3-4-^-/o
(^P

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
Pooftj.^ -CXPAPED COAEAE <,tnw} blsuik,
o'ly (5p)
Uppor «^' A6 ABOVE ; then SA-K)t>y
SIUT. ar^, wet, v.sfiff (•SN)
•SANUy -SlUTj ^r?,Vi ^^V „ ^hff
C-SM)
A^ ABOVE (Sf-\:>

A-S A8ov& (-SM")

8.0-M. <£, 14'
t

o
0
01
so
>o
a> -i












COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Uvt\ \>

tT'«i^o>\
c^z^r&yv* .
                                                                                             REV 7/86  FORMD1S86

-------
                                    PROJECT NUMBER
                                     G,LO 6,554, /.FI./^T
                                                                BORING NUMBER
                SHEET
                        /  OF  /
                                                            SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
          G, 4 H  t-A*JDF>Ll-
ALofiJC,  R.R.
ELEVATION.
                                       DRILLING CONTRACTOR   MA TEL&Q
DRILLING METHOD AND
WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                                    8SO
                                          START  <£-/£-**?
                                                              FINISH
                                                                                 -LOGGER.
                  AJ.

s£
in ...
DEPTH B
SURFACI
0
5 -

/O -

•

.
;rt
IS

-i
INTEHVA


//


/3

15

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBER


S-|

S-2

5-3



>
oc
111
O
K


o.fe

1-0

0.5


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
INI

3-\Vlt-Zo
(29;
/J-lk-14-lfc
(
(2>«0



SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
1
POORLV- GRACED COARSE 5AM O , \&AK; r^oist; 4e*\->e ,o'il\j ^?5"
Upper 0.*' A<. ABOVE (SP) > t^h
PooPLV- OiC-^^e-O F>N£ •S/MMD t bretow -
loe-Vj ys ABovE (^P)



0
o
o
SO
> o
10 -I








•
COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Le.ve.1 
-------
K'MKIIH
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                       quo
                                                                  BORING NUMBER
                                                                        ? A
                                                                                          SHEET
                                                                                                     OF
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
PBn..PrT
ELEVATION .
          G, t H  LAHDFILI.
                                                             . LOCATION.
                                                                                  LANPPIU, AMD dAN)*U
                                        . nnii i iKirs rnNTRAfrrnR   M/A TE.C.O
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT_
WATER LEVEL AND DATE  NoT M£A£>Ug£P
                                     850 «
                                                                   Z" SPLIT
                                            START   6-30-8?
                                                               . FINISH.

BUI
U
52
a oc
UI3
O)

11-Hf-Z.o
(30

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY, USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
PooRJ-V -Gjp.At>E.t> '5AKlt> , medium j TTAce.
^vc\, wet >w^.
AS ABov&^^p)

Upper 0.5' A6 ABovt (^P^ , -(-l»,M SILT/
SA^P ' -fi«t_, ^Tee^rtK ar&^ , \**?r (SM)
^

u
O
a
> o
M -1








COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-

G|H-qrt^A- 0 | •• 4'-t' ~

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                       G,LO
                              BORING NUMBER
                                  4oB
                                                      SHEET
/   OF /
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
          G, $ H
ELEVATION .
                                         DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT.
850
                                                                        SPLIT
WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                                            . START
                          .FINISH.
                                                                                    .LOGGER.
                                                                                             AT
*_
ii
IU 1.1
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O

5 -



-
IQ
-

15 -
-

lo-



2,5-


_j
INTERVA


*

•8


|O
14

Ifc


ao.5

2Z

Zfa

SAMPLE
Q_
«5o3

I4-I?-I4
(3W

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT,
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
WELL.- ^CAOED SAhiD ^/djRAVEL,,
cxior fev\O
AS ABOVE. (SV-O

POOC.LS- dpJVDeo OoPv&SE. SAMT>
"/cxe-^EL., Wovow> wet ravn},
„<&, v,

PboRJ-H - ACADEO SAHC> **/ -SILT, afdM ,
loft" v . &•&**>%. (^P-'yW)
PooBUS- 6liAOO> FIME. ^>ANO, ucttj
vJe»\-,«. (sp>

SILT, ^5% Sdnd, ^rio ujfct^
Thf?- (Mt)
B.O.H\. @. 2^,'.

o
o
a
>o
in -i



















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-

^•KoB-di. +'-<,' ~
.




.
, ;
6|H"GlK40& '*' '5 ^
-

/ 7
^^/-^//•^o 6-03 ' 2(3,5 -22.


—
See totll Cjf>\^h" ocKffK,
                                                                                               REV 7/86 FORM 01586

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                   BORING NUMBER
                                                                                           SHEET
                                                                                                      OF  /
                                                               SOIL BORING LOG
                   LAUDFILL
                                                                                SOUTH  OF Qtl_
ELEVATION .
                                         , DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
DRILLING METHOD AND



WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                                      850
tf.S.A.  :   Z"  SPLIT 5/=%x>A/5
                                6-ZO--89
                                             START
                                                                 F.N.SH
                                                                                    -LOGGER-
                                          />£A/A/«C/<
*-~
s£
111 ...
DEPTH B
SURFACI
O
5 -
/O -

'5:

Zo-




_


~i
INTERVA
9

//



2.1

23

Z.5

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBEF

5-1



S-2.

C..3,
3 J
S-4



>•
QC
UJ
O
K

n,<5



0.7


1-8
I.1?


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
IN)

2-U- 12-10
(Z35

/,-a-ii - I).

(Z\J
H-I4-I5-I4
(ZT)
2-IZ-II.-I7
(.Zoj

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
Ao£j££. COTTIM<^1> o'-^'j
Poe&u^ -C^&P,tic.v> FlMEL iAi^t), brouov,—
i^-V, me^l. c3ie*v4e (SV>^
-
Upper o- T A3 ABovE C^P) e^cepf qray,
tVw SIUT, ^ra.y, wtf , ,KK C^<-5

ASA60VE(MO H

A6 AOOVC C^O

B.O.H.  o
in -i












COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
U.Me.1 b


-

-



-

ia^r&«v\ .
                                                                                               REV 7/86 FORM D1586

-------
                                      PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                     BORING NUMBER
                                                                                              SHEET
                                                                                                          OF
                                                                SOIL BORING LOG
          G, t H
                                                                . LOCATION.
                                                                                   "SOOTH  QP  OH-
ELEVATION	 nan i iMfi rnNTBAf.TnR    MATEdO



DRILLING METHOD AND FDIMPMPNT   C./V\£.  8SO  •,  4-/+"  //. 5.
                                                                  '   Z"  SPLl T
WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                                              START
                                                                  . FINISH.
ll
x <
a K
aw
°
-
5 -
-
/o -
-

/5 -


"








25-

•
Jo
SAMPLE
_,
J
UJ
Z





/4

/t




2o

22.

24

at

Z-8


Q^
** in
of s
ni






VI


s-z.


5-3

5-4

5-5

s-«,

S"7


oc
UJ


St






0 ^


1.2.


1-4

(•I

1.5

2




STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS

6"-6"-6"
(N)







J-t-13-IO
(f»)
11-13-1^-15
(2fc)

5-5-7--]

30-3o-5°/' "
C*>3
/5-tl-39
, '\r^'i, (*>?.T
•
-
Rx3(Zi.-«/ - GjpADW SvKKlD W/SlL."T" <»rdv
. . ^T> ex U —
wt-t, wed-den^e ^>? 5(A)
AS Abovfc (-SP-^n)


A^> ABOVE CSP-^M")

SILT/ ^MD, ^ra-^^voe-V, v.d«Art*><.

A5 ABovE L^^)

" SILT, ^-f, wtt) Wd (h^)

AS ABovf. (.M1-^ , except ^- ^^te

B.O.H. € 2-a'

o
3
CO
20
«3























COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
Levtl C.
_
:
-
-
-

. /




^









5ee. well Cjjrv^Tr
-------
^JHj^B PROJECT NUMBER
frifilTZffT ^ ** * ' ' •
BORING NUMBER
I QH430 SHEET
1 OF 2-
SOIL BORING LOG
oar\ icf*T Car 5 /* L—r\w&^^i^l~
rnUiJclj 1 _, ^™l ~ '
Fl PVATION nRII 1 INiri CONTRACTOR
nmi i iNRMPTHOn ANH FOIIIPUCNT C/V\£ 85O • 4-'+" H • 5,
i or.ATioN SOOTH op CAOAU
MA TEC.O
A. • Z" SPLIT 5AXW5



WATER LEVEL AND DATE K^OT'
.START.
                       F.NISH
                                                       JT
*r-
s£
BUI
0
52
&§
OO)
o

5 -
-

|0 -

-


-

Zo -


Z5-


3o

_J
INTERV>»


t
9

//

/3

;s


z/


2t
Z9

3o
SAMPLE
O
TYPE AN
NUMBEF


5-1


S-2.

5-3

5-4


S-5


s-t

S-r
-/

>•
cc
UJ
O
ig


0.2.


I.Z

M

to


1 o


I-L


O.(o
STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"

3.3.4-7
(73

5-f-9-io
0^
iz-t^-a.\-V
(3^
io-i-*-a\-z<3
C5»

- . « — ^ .
Cn?

5kl-5S- SI/
C^o

32- W/t "

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
V\JE.U--6iP-M>£.D 'SfcME* / fl|?A\/EL ,
iMortV, Jloo&e. (SxV)
-
Poogl.'y -<^£.P F>(OE SAtJD, \\,
broio^j uxAj *r\<^,a€v\*'t C^?^ —
Opper 0. ")' A^> ^BOV£.(_SP3. tr>€.v»
^r^5^^^j rv
Uowr )«5' AS ABOVE (5P_>v tW
SluTH SK^O. 4f&vi vutV oe*»^(L (S'*O
-
poov2.L,S - ^iPJ\^£-D Or\>JW / ^' 1 3
^rd^, UK.!, *.d**«. (SP-5rA->

ii A-b ABovt (_^P-S^


bH-T1^ ^>K'JT> ^ ^'^-Si \*»cV. v. clftwscC.^'"'


o
o
a
SO
>o
to -i



















COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
-

nwMol- Titl TJVJ Icvet \ _
-
( ,
G,H 436-01 : 1 -1 1

G,H43Tb-oi'. U'- 14'
j
reZ\V V^€ w«^ w^;vJ.
0


-
Gri 43 B - o V. 2jo'~ 5o'
"
-


                                                         REV 7/86  FORMO1588

-------
                                     PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                  BORING NUMBER
                                                                        458
                                                                                          SHEET
                                                                                                     OF
                                                              SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT.
                                                              LOCATION.
                                                                          SooTH   OF
ELEVATION.
                                         DRILLING CONTRACTOR.
                                                                   TEC.Q
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT



WATER LEVEL AND DATE  ™°T
                                     850
tf.S.A.
                                                                        SPLI T
                                            START
                                                               . FINISH
                                                                                    .LOGGER.

ui ^7
DEPTH B
SURFACI
30

-
35 -

_,
INTERVA
32.

33-5

SAMPLE
Q
TYPE AN
NUMBER


s-a


DC
RECOVE
(FT)


1.5

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"

5-7-^
(IO

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE. MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
SiuT VJiTH SMJDj ^ajijwe'r, 9l c-W *-"^ ^' •

-
Set wel\ con'bT'fiACTU'Vx
' Q Yrv-
                                                                                              REV 7/86  FORMO1586

-------
                                        PROJECT NUMBER
                                         G,LO
                                                                       BORING NUMBER
                                                                                                SHEET
                                                                                                            OF
                                                                  SOIL BORING LOG
ELEVATION
DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

WATER LEVEL AND DATE
                                       ___ DRILLING CONTR ACTOR
                                        8SO'.  ^- ^ ^  //. 5.
                                                                  . LOCATION
                                                                   MA
                                                                                      Of
                                                                        Z" SPLl T
                                               START
                                                                    F.NISH
DEPTH BELOW
SURFACE (FT)
0


-
lo
-

15 —

SAMPLE
INTERVAL
3
5
?
10
12.
1+
He

TYPE AND
NUMBER

s-\

S-2
5-3
S-4-
S-5

RECOVERY
(FT)

0,1

/.3
/•t
/.5


STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

/-3-3-f
(0

6-9-/6-/Z
09J>
S-/0-I3-/8
ow
•3-3-/3-I5
Oo
/O -Z+-25-3
(4^

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME. COLOR. MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
SiLT'l SMJO, dtr. 4fA4.> tooi •*>!", -fijoose.
$ /
£-9
Pooei.vl - CeAO£O 5MOD. £\»\fl. . AV.V>ro«m"
U*«i-; ^«^ceft W Vo r^«d.
A6 ABov/t (s?}
2 ^5 ABovS. C5^ ,e*c«pT (iewi«-

B.o.rt. fi. It'

SYMBOLIC
LOG


COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
U«t\ I>,
-
-
(il4 4-4-A- a 1 • in'— i? '

^H-nA-oi-. 12.' -n'


S«e lAX-H O^-^rue-W^
jia^r^im .
O
                                                                                                    REV 7/86 FORMD1588

-------
                                        PROJECT NUMBER
                                                                        BORING NUMBER
                                                                                                 SHEET
                                                                                                          /  OF   /
                                                                   SOIL BORING LOG
           G, 4 H
ELEVATION
                                                                   LOCATION
                                            DRILLING CONTRACTOR    MA
of
ELEVATION	 npii i iNr; r.niMTHACiTHH    /-i,n i t-v^i^	
DRILLING METHOD AND FniiiPMFMT   CMg  8SO \  4- '+ "  H- 5. A .  *   2.'  SPLl T
	.	  	   KJeT MtA^OerD        o-r.o-r  ^-27-^9     ^..,,,-LJ   ^-22-T!
WATER LEVEL AND DATE.
                                               START
                                                                    . FINISH.
                                                                                          .LOGGER.
$ —
k
ui •••
DEPTH B
SURFACI
0

5 -



}O -





15 -

i
_j
INTERVA
4-

4

8

\o

12.

)4

/^

SAMPLE
Q_
-i
>i


S-l

5-2-

b-5

5H-

S-5

5-^


V
(T
UJ
ie


o,5
i *2
l,o

1.5

1.5

.0

0.-8

STANDARD
PENETRATION
TEST
RESULTS
6"-6"-6"
(N)

2-5-4-5
c«
4-5e-4>
(lo;
4-5-7-5
0^
4-4 -5-t
0»
3-4-4-9
•c«
7-//-/0-//
(^0

SOIL DESCRIPTION
SOIL NAME, COLOR, MOISTURE CONTENT.
RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL
STRUCTURE, MINERALOGY. USCS GROUP
SYMBOL
-
FbofcLS -£,*.*«>£& FiiOfL SftiOO, ffcUrtV)
WOVMT.J mov-iV , ^oo^t (sp^)
A^» A6^£- C^P^

AS AftOVE/SP^j et^e^tJlt. Vjrtwm,
\XiCff»«es wet oth>m fc-iocKA,WD "•>/ SiuT Woum,
ux.V, Jljioi?. (SP-SrO
AS ABovE (_'5P-Si-\-)

AS ABOOE. (,Sp- 5n^

&.o.rt, ^. If

u
SYMBOl
LOG














COMMENTS
DEPTH OF CASING.
DRILLING RATE.
DRILLING FLUID LOSS.
TESTS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
LeoeA b






(
Gjri45A -01 - IO~I2.

6;H454-62' 12'- H,'


See w
-------
                   Technical Memorandum No. 4

                         Attachment 2
           GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
GLT863/054.50

-------
CA-2-79
                                chen and  associates, inc.
                 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                         SIEVE ANALYSIS.
24
45
100
90
80
70
ieo
UJ
040
UJ
Q.
20
1Q
0
HR. 7
MIN 15
}1 .01
Til
HR.
MIN 60V
12 CX
IE RE/
IN 19
IS OC
hDINGS
MIN 4 M
19 0
N 1 V
9 o:
»IN '2
17 0

•4 14
U.S.
0 '5
9 .2
STAND
0 -40 "3
97 1 .5
.42
»HD SEF
0 -1
30 1
1IES
• M
19
•
_
2.
0
1
J '4
36 4.
t
76 9.
CLEAR £
52 1!
>OUARE
." 1*
).1 38
OPENII>
-" 3
.1 . 7
4GS
5
	
i.2 12

-
7
1!
-
2l!
a
S 6 8 a 3 °"'
RETAINED
Z
ul
S
70
80
30
lo00
                                    DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT
I
| FINE
SAND
| MEDIUM

ICOARSE
GRAVEL
FINE | COARSE
COBBLES
                   GRAVEL    8  %




                      LIQUID LIMIT




                   SAMPLE OF




              Natural  Moisture =
SAND  47 %       SILT AND CLAY   45    %



  %      PLASTICITY INDEX          %



                 FROM Sample  No.  GH-SS02/4308 E-01
       89
24
45
100
90
80
0
Z fiO
CA
PERCENT PAS
o 8 8 £ 8
0
.0
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
HR. 7 1
MIN 15

m^^m
01 .OC
Tl
HR.
*IN 60 K

2 .OC
MERE
«IN 19
—^
» M
ADINGS
MIN 4 M
b=
» .01
IN 1 H
r~^^
9 0.

0'3

n > s
42
RTICLi
tRD SEH
0 -1

90 1.
= IN Ml
I£S
•10
s r
— h
I 	 r
19 12.
2.0
.LIMET
3

38 4.
ERS
SAND
FINE
MEDIUM (COARSE
*

76 9.
3LEAR !
r *

>2 1!
.OUARE
," 1

).1 X
OPENlix
*- 2

.1 76
GRAVEL
FINE | COARSE
IGS
- • !
^J
r

.2 127
1
r

52
1°
10
30
Q
8 8 3 8 S
PERCENT RET A
100
»
COBBLES
GRAVEL 26 % SAND 61 % SILT AND CLAY 13 %
LIQUID LIMIT * PLASTICITY INDEX *
SAMPLE OF FROM Sample No. GH-SS07/4308 E-02
Natural Moisture = 8.8% ,
GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fin ]

-------
CA-2-79
                               chen and associates, inc.
24
45
100
90
80
70
iso
O. en
O 4Q
S
20
10
0
.a

HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
HR. 7
MIN 15
)1 2 .OC
WERE/
(IN 19
)5 .OC
DOINGS
MIN 4 M
19 01
N 1H
9 0.
MH "I
17 0
DIA
CLAY TO SILT
SIEVE ANALYSIS ]
X) '1C
4 1'
METER
U.S.
» -5
19 .2
OF PA
STAND
0 '40 "it
^
37
. 4
RTI
.5'
12
CL
ARD SEF
0 '1
=a
» i
E IN Ml
1IES
•10
s r
=3
(
19 2.
2.0
LLIME1
3 •'
•— ' ^)
38 4.
rEHS
SAND
FINE
GRAVEL 0 % SAND 1 S %
MEDIUM [COARSE
i
76 9.
CLEAR !
.- i
52 1!
iOUARE
." 1'
1.1 3S
OPEN^
»- 3
.1 . 71
GRAVEL
FINE | COARSE
4GS
5-
>.2 12
H
7
1
1
3- e
"l
COBBLES
SILT AND CLAY 85 %

                     LIQUID LIMIT
                  SAMPLE OF
                Natural  Moisture
PLASTICITY INDEX
       FROM Sample No. GH-SS10A308 E-03
24
45
100
90
80
70
irn
«
H
UJ
£40
s
30
20
10
0
.0
I
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
HR. 7t
MIN 151

01 .00
T
«.
JIN. 60 H

3 .OC
MERE
»IN 19

IS .OC
AOINGS
MIN 4V

M .01
IN. 1 N
- -
9 .a
UN '21
==
37 .0
OIA
CLAY TO SILT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
30 '1C
P— ^
'* .14
METER
U.S.
» '5

9 2
OF PA
STAND/
0 '40 '3
— 1=
	 1—
=4

37 1 S
.42
RTICLE
\RO SEF
0 *i

X) 1.
: IN Ml
IES
B 7
	 f:
=&
ZT-T:
: 	 1-
19 fe.
2.0
LLIMET
3

38 4.
ERS
SAND
FINE
MEDIUM ICOARSE
>

76 9.
CLEAR £
I- »

i2 !<
>OUARE
.- 1

1.1 M
OPENIh
ff 3

.1 76
GRAVEL
FINE I COARSE
IGS
r •

5'

.2 127
1
r

zd
sz

10
20
30
O
40g
8 S S 8 g
PERCENT RETS
100
10
COBBLES
                  GRAVEL   12  %
                     LIQUID LIMIT
                  SAMPLE OF
                   19
 1  413 89
                    SAND  69  %      SILT AND CLAY
                      %      PLASTICITY INDEX          *
                                    FROM  Sample No. GH-SS12A308 E-04
Natural Moisture =  11.2£
                 GRADATION TEST RESULTS
                             Fig.

-------
CA-2-79
                               chen  and  associates, inc.
                HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                        SIEVE ANALYSIS
24
45
100
90
80
70
2rn
PERCENT PASSIf
8 8 6 S !
10
61
01
MR. 7
MIN 15


Tl
HR.
MIN 60 fk


ME RE/
(IN 19


IDINGS
MIN 4 M


IN 1 t.
r**-

«IN '2


DO MC


U.S.
K) *5


STAND
0 '40 "3
1
—y-
— 1 —

*RD SEF
0 '1


11 ES
. -1


°-


3 'J





CLEAR S


>OUARE
4" T


OPENIfs
4" 3


as
J


"


51 .002 005 009 019 u37 074 149 197 1 .590 1.19 2.38 476 952 19.1 38.1. 76.2 127
.42 2.0 1
j"


2
52
r
0
10
20
30
O
UJ
UJ
50 =
•z
UJ
60 C
a
70
80
JU
jo00
                                   DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT
GRAVEL 2 1 %
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
Natural Moisture =
SAND
FINE | MEDIUM (COARSE
GRAVEL
FINE | COARSE
COBBLES
SAND 60 % SILT AND CLAY 1 9 %
PLASTICITY IND^
%

FROM Sample No. GH-SS1 4/4308 E
10. IS:


                HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                        SIEVE ANALYSIS
24
45
100
90
80
70
O
CO
<
"•••n
*
E40
Ul
0.
30
20
10
0
.0
r
HR. 71
MIN IS
01 OC
Tl
^.
xllN 60k
2 .OC
ME RE
1IN 19
>5 .OC
*DINGS
MIN 4 fc
K 01
IN 1 K
9 .0
KIN '?
37 0
DIA
CLAY TO SILT
» '1C
14 .14
WETER
U.S.
0 '5
9 2
OF PA
STAND
0 '40 "3
t=±=
— I—
=fc:
37 1 .5
42
RTICLI
*RD SEF
O -1
90 1.
; IN Ml
IES
6 7
	 1-
: — h
l 	 j-
19 12.
2.0
LLIMET
3
38 4.
ERS
SAND
FINE | MEDIUM ICOARSE
»<
76 9..
:LEAR £
V *
>2 1!
>OUARE
." 1
).1 34
OPENIN
/,- 3
.1 76
GRAVEL I
FINE | COARSE 1
GS
- '
.2 12
>"
7
1
3.
2(
>2
30
O
40^
<
H-
UJ
50 C
*-
z
UJ
600
K
S
70
80
90
too
M
COBBLES
                  GRAVEL    0   %
                     LIQUID LIMIT

                  SAMPLE OF
                   SAND
                     %
77
 %
23 %       SILT AND CLAY
   PLASTICITY INDEX    NP
           FROM  Sample No. GH-SS11/4308 E-06
 1  413  89
Natural Moisture = 18.52
                GRADATION TEST RESULTS
                                                                             Fig.

-------
CA-2-79
                                 chen and associates, inc.
                  HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                           SIEVE ANALYSIS
                     TIME READINGS
                                              U.S. STANDARD SERIES
                                                                      CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24
45
too
90
70
60
50
40
20
(X
HR 7 HR.
MIN 15 MIN 60 H

>1 OC

)2 CK
(IN 19

>S OC
MIN 4 M

19 01
N 1 K

9 o:
.- :.- V*- 3- 5-

16 9.

52 1'

) 1 36

.1 . 7f

1.2 12
7
1
5"
^^H

2(
52
r
0
8 6 8 8 3
ENT RETAINED
£
70
80
90
,0°°
                                     DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
                     CLAY TO SILT
                                                   SAND
                                            FINE
                                                  |   MEDIUM  [COARSE
                                                                        GRAVEL
                                                                     FINE
                                                                            COARSE
                                                                                   4 COBBLES
                    GRAVEL    6   %      SAND 3 6  %       SILT AND CLAY   58   %
                      LIQUID LIMIT     2k           PLASTICITY INDuX    10
                    SAMPLE OF                              FROM  Sample  No.  GH-SS1 5A308 E-07
                   Natural  Moisture  = 12.8%
24
45
100
90
80
70
O
en
<
5
£40
UJ
a.
30
20
10
0
.0

HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
HR 7
MIN 151
01 OC
Tl
HR.
v»IN 60 K
2 .OC
ME RE
4IN 19
ts .oc
ADINGS
MIN 4 H
yd 01
IN 1 K
i 	 r-
9 .0
• IN "»
37 0
DIA
CLAY TO SILT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
X '1C
U 14
METER
U.S.
10 -5
9 .2
OF PA
STA
0 "4
I—
37
RTI
ND
0'3
.5
12
CLI
«,RD SEF
0 -1
^^ 1
90 1
E IN Ml
IES
S 7
t=f=
— b
19 ft.
2.0
-LIMET
9
•>
38 4
ERS
SAND
FINE
GRAVEL 6 % SAND kk %
MEDIUM
COARSE
*
S=—
76 9
:LEAR s
b- »
>2 1<
OUARE
." 1
.1 3£
OPENIN
V 2
.1 76
GRAVEL
FINE | COARSE
GS
" ' 5"
.2 12
7
1
>"
2l!
52

10
20
30
a
»-
UJ
Z
UJ
60 O
cc
UJ
a.
70
80
90
100
X)
COBBLES
SILT AND CLAY 50 %
      89
 SAMPLEOF                             FROM  Sample  No.  GH-SS16/4308 E-08
Natural  Moisture  = 21.3
                 GRADATION TEST RESULTS               Fig	!

-------
CA-2-79
                                  chen and  associates, inc.
24
45
100
90
80
70
itt
to
<
°» 50
^
Z
UJ-
s
20
10
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
HH. 7
MIN 15

Tl
MR.
MIN. 60 fc

ME REX
UN 19

hDINGS
MIN. 4 M

IN. 1 »,

illN. *2

SIEVE ANALYSIS
» MO

U.S.
O '5
i 	
STAND
0 '40-3
=?*=
— H —
m—
ARO SEF
0 '1

*IES
• •'

'
-

5
^^^

*

CLEAR !
r '
?=

SQUARE
,- 1

OPENIt

JGS
S

•(
-
-
.001 002 .005 .009 019 .037 074 149 297 1 .590 1.19 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 38.1 . 76.2 127
.42 2.0 1
| DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT
SANO
FINE | MEDIUM (COARSE
GRAVEL
FINE | COARSE
5"

2C
92

r
0
10
20
30
0
UJ
40 Z
88388
PERCENT RE
»
COBBLES
                                         SAND 56  %

                                           %
GRAVEL    6   %

   LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF


Natural  Moisture =  26.0%
                                       SILT AND CLAY   38   %

                               PLASTICITY INDEX    NP    %

                                       FROM  Sample  No.  GH-SS22A308 E-09
                  HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                             SIEVE ANALYSIS
24
45
100
90
80
70
O
PERCENT PAS
3 8 8 fi 8
0
HR. 71
MIN 151

^- "^
Tl
HR.
MIN. 60 »
„.-•'-•

ME RE
DIN. 19

-r-rr
AOINGS
MIN 4 M


IN 1 k


4IN. '2


0 '1C
^^r~'

u.s.
W -5


STAND/
0 -40'3
=±=
— i—
I — !—
=±=

KRD SEP
0 -1


IES
8 7
	 b
	 1-

3


*


CLEARS
fc" *


»QUAR£
." 1


OPENIls
ff 2


GS
" '

j"

r

m-J 	
10
O
88388
PERCENT RET A
100
           .001  .002    .005  .009   XlTi   XI37  ^74   J49   .297 ' .590   TTS  &38  4/76   9^52   19J   38.1   76J 127' 200
            .                                        42         2.0                            152

            I	                     DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS                      	I
                      CLAY TO SILT
                                                     SAND
                                             FINE
                                                                           GRAVEL
                                                    |   MEDIUM  ICOARSEl   FINE   |  COARSE
                                                                                      •(COBBLES
      89
GRAVEL   1 7   %      SAND 6

   LIQUID LIMIT           *

SAMPLE OF


Natural  Moisture =  12.9^

                  GRADATION TEST RESULTS
                                                  *        SILT AND CLAY    1 9   %

                                                  PLASTICITY INDEX      NP   *

                                                           FROM Sample No. GH-SS23A308 E-10
                                                                Fig

-------
CA-2-79
                                 chen and associates, inc.
                 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                          SIEVE ANALYSIS
24
45
100
90
80
70
i60
at
PERCENT PAS
38868
0
.01
HR 7
MIN 15
=»—
)1 .(X
Tl
HR.
MIN. 60 H
__iJ
12 CX
MERE/
(IN 19
=
)5 .OC
IDINGS
MIN. 4 M

19 0
N. t K
?=
9 -u:
4IN. '7
-~—B
7 0
DIA
CLAY TO SILT
TO 'K

74 14
METER
U.S.
10 -5

9 .2
OF PA
STAND
0 '40'3


97 1 5
.42
RTICL
ARD SEF
0 *1

M l
EINMI
HES 1 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
•10 '
=^

19 2.
2.0
LLIME1




38 4.76 9.
^ERS
SAND
FINE
GRAVEL 21 % SAND 62 %
MEDIUM COARSE


52 1<


).1 3i


.1 . 7
GRAVEL
FINE | COARSE



5.2 127
1


2(
52

0
10
20
30
0
UJ
40Z
88388
PERCENT RET
X)
COBBLES
SILT AND CLAY 1 7 %

                      LIQUID LIMIT
                   SAMPLE OF
                   Natural Moisture
            PLASTICITY INDIIX    NP
                    FROM Sample  No.  GH-SS2V4308 E-11
    8.4%
                 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                          SIEVE ANALYSIS
24
4S
100
90
BO
70
z rn
V,
s.
1.
£
30
20
10
0
.O
HR 71
MIN. 15
01 .OC
Tl
HR.
k4IN 60 K
12 .OC
MERE
MN 19
15 .OC
WINGS
MIN 4 V
19 .01
IN 1 It
9 .0.
4IN '2
37 0
DIA
CLAY TO SILT
10 '1C
'* .14
METER
u.s.
a -5
9 2
OF PA
STA
0 '4
NO
0'3
p=
1
^rr
yi > .5
42
RTICLI
^RD SEF
10 M
	
90 1.
: IN Ml
IES
•1
9
2
LLIM!
°-
k.
.0
rr
3 •<
38 4.
ERS
SAND
FINE
MEDIUM
COARSE
*
76 9.i
;LEAR J
a
>2 1<
>OUARE
,- 1
9.1 31
OPENIh
y :
.1 76
GRAVEL
FINE
COARSE
IGS
r • •
1 	 '
.2 12
>"
-
7
1
r
2C
52
10
10
20
30
O
40S
<
H-
UJ
^~
Z
UJ
600
UJ
a.
70
80
90
100
X)
COBBLES
                   GRAVEL       %
                      LIQUID LIMIT
                   SAMPLE OF
   SAND
     %
%       SILT AND CLAY
PLASTICITY INDEX
        FROM
l M3  89
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
                               Fig-

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 5	AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:     Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         Jeffrey Lamont/GLO

DATE:      September 28, 1989

SUBJECT:  Variable Head Hydraulic Conductivity
            Testing and Analysis
            G&H Landfill Phase III RI
PROJECT:  GLO65561.FLFQ
                                INTRODUCTION
Aquifer tests were conducted on several of the monitoring wells at the G&H Landfill site
on August 8 and 9, 1989.  Hydraulic conductivity values of the three surficial aquifer units
(i.e., upper sand unit, till unit, and middle sand unit) were measured using variable head
(slug) tests.  The tests were performed to provide information that will be used in
calculations related to groundwater and contaminant velocities and in developing and
evaluating the  feasibility of a groundwater extraction system.  This memorandum describes
the test methods, data evaluation procedures, test results, and data limitations for the tests
performed at the site.

Variable head (slug) tests  are single well tests performed to estimate hydraulic conductivity
in the vicinity  of the well screen by adding or removing a known volume of water.  The
rate at which the water level in the well recovers is measured and used to estimate the
hydraulic conductivity.

Both rising and falling head tests were conducted at the landfill site. By applying an
artificial pressure head to  the well, either  in the form of a solid PVC slug or a volume of
inert gas under pressure, a known volume of water was displaced through the well screen
back into the aquifer.  When the well fully stabilized from this stress, the slug (of either
PVC or gas pressure)  was removed instantaneously.  Data were then collected while water
levels recovered within the well.  Tests were performed by Jeffrey Lamont and Dan Plomb
of CH2M HILL.

Variable head tests were performed on monitoring wells GH03A, GH03B, GH03C, RD24,
GH29A, GH29B, GH29C, GH31A, GH31B, GH31C, and GH36B.  Locations are shown in
Figure 1.  "A" wells are screened near the water table surface in the upper  sand unit; "B"
wells are screened just above the till unit  in the upper sand unit;  and "C" wells are
screened in  the till unit. All tests were run in triplicate to improve the confidence in the
test  results, with the exception of the "C" wells which were run in duplicate  for statistical
verification of results.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 5                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 2
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
                             METHOD OF  TESTING

Two methods were used to displace the static water column in the wells.  The preferred
method consisted of displacing water from the well using nitrogen gas.  This method is
preferred because contact between potentially contaminated wellwater and testing
equipment and personnel is minimized, with only a single transducer requiring
decontamination. It also reduces the possibility of cross-contamination of wellwater when
test equipment is moved between several different wells. Use of the nitrogen depression
method was limited to wells in which a sufficient volume of water could be displaced from
the riser pipe without lowering the water level below the top of the well screen. Because
nitrogen gas would leak through the screen, it was not physically possible to use this
method when the water level was below the screen.  A PVC slug was used to displace
wellwater when the screened interval was close  to or straddled the water table.

NITROGEN  DEPRESSION METHOD

Equipment

The test assembly for displacing wellwater using the nitrogen gas depression method is
shown in Figure 2. The wellhead assembly is attached to the top of the riser pipe.  A
gastight seal between the assembly and riser pipe is achieved by mechanically expanding a
rubber packer at the base of the assembly.  The wellhead assembly contains gastight ports
for connecting  two pressure transducers, a fitting for attaching a pressure  regulator, and a
vent valve.

The pressure transducers are connected to a Campbell Scientific Model 21X  electronic
data logger.  Transducer No. 1 measures total head, which  is the sum of the  elevation
head and pressure head above the transducer.  Transducer No. 2 measures the pressure
head resulting from the nitrogen gas. Besides recording head values at discrete time
intervals for later analysis, the data logger is  programmed to calculate hydraulic
conductivity directly in the field  using simplifying assumptions regarding aquifer  geometry.
Therefore, a quick field check on the validity of the data is possible before disassembling
the equipment.

Testing Procedure

The wellhead assembly and transducer equipment are set up at the well location as shown
in Figure 2.  The initial water level (initial head) with respect to Transducer  No. 1 is
recorded before pressurizing the system.  Pressurized nitrogen, controlled  by regulators in
the nitrogen  supply line, is then introduced into  the riser pipe.  The  equivalent  water
height due to the nitrogen pressure head is read directly from Transducer No. 2. The
amount of pressure head introduced to the well is controlled to  displace at least 2 to
3 feet of water, but not to displace well water below the top of the screen.  The pressure

-------
I

§
CO
H
s
•&
§
        <  J02  j::-:
       \ :'    ;-O4'-
       J, :.   Cf'.
        \\.  Ql
        V":  sat
                                                              RW30
                                                               ®
                                                                             ,,,£®GH15A,B.C
                                                          *RW19
                 S,
 '<.  ®
 GH22A,B
       '
RW20
                                  PHASE ii!
                                  LAMDFiLL
                                                          \\
                                                            '
                                                                                                                             GH16A.B.C _
                                                                                                                               °B12
                                                                                                                                                               GH18B
                                                                                                                                                                .••'GP07 .,•",
                                                                                                                                                                                             GH14A.B.C ^
                                                                                                    RL06
                                                                                                                        RL04
                               ;{0RB01
                              B6
                                                 \\  RW07
                                                                                            RW05
                                                                         .,
                                                                         -^ GH37A
                                                                         ••'
                                                                                                 RB27O
                                                                    *ZS
                                                                 RD24
    n              RW05       'i

RB26    RD8             *     !|

 RB25)    O     PHASE \ LANDFILL
                                                                                                                                                              I o  :  AUTOMOSSLE
                                                                                                                                                              :;r;  ^   DISPOSAL
                                                                                                                                                              r. :;.       YARO
                                                                                                                                                             •
                                                                                                                                                                            ••••• "£!.
                                                                                                                                                                            GH17A.B.C
                                                                                                                                                                              \\ GP11
                                                                                                                                                                    GH19A.B   ..,,,,.,'"™^»Ni I
                                                                                                                                                                             i      in
                      RQ
                       O PHASE \\ LAMDRLL
                              V  ^            V2
                               \ \ GH31A.B.C
                                                                                                                             |   |	I    [	]  Lj
                                                                                                         /;•'  / jp^  GH
                                                                                                         ^~-^f x     /
                                                                                                          _   ^^rl     /
                                                                                                                                                       —.. -•«--- •••..-:. »~^:>
                                                                                                                                                       GH34A.&V,,. ........    ,.,:,:K'

                                                                                                                                                       ....,'''",••'"""•-• ^V..-""'; . 'V-
                                                                                                               v.;y...   .,..    ;   .....    -'\  •.

                                                                                                                 ...."" V:"5xV-.:.: '."-::'::':v. ••-.....    '  '• . j   Hi
                                                                                                               "'.I?.;.-        "" •'-•---.- dM09A.,BV:::- ., ..    ^:|

                                                                                                                .........                      "" -:-':"v
                                                                                 \
                                                                                                                     •' :'j|B GH08A.B.C
                                                                                                                                              -v   :i:;:;::;::

                                                                                                                            22 - MILE ROAD ^44 ^
                                                                                                                                                     GH10A,B,C
                                                                                                                                                     1600'^
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       North
                                                                                            LEGEND


                                                                                                ft:::5:::::SS5  LANDFILL BOUNDARY


                                                                                       x	x	x	x  U.S. EPA SITE FENCE


                                                                                              H          GATE


                                                                                                         DITCH, STREAM, OR
                                                                                       •"'-•.•••"	" '   RIVER


                                                                                        :;: •_,..	:V;.:; :;    TRAIL


                                                                                                         RAILROAD GRADE
                                                                                       ,      , ..,,.™w,,5   BRACKS REMOVED)




                                                                                                ©     WELLS TESTED

                                                                                        GH29A.B.C
                                                                                                                                                                            FIGURE 1
                                                                                                                                                                            IN SITU HYDRAULIC
                                                                                                                                                                            CONDUCTIVITY
                                                                                                                                                                            TESTING LOCATIONS
                                                                                                                                                                            G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                                                                                                            TECH. MEMO. NO. 5

-------
                                Pressure
                                Regulator
Weil-Head
Assembly •
                                                                    Pressure
                                                                    Regulatoi
Expandable
Rubber
Packer
                                Pressure
                                Transducer
                                No. 2
                            L = Length of Test Zone
Pressure
Transducer
No. 1
                                                   NOT TO SCALE
                               Radius of well
                         r  or R = Radius of borehole
                                                       FIGURE 2
                                                       SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF
                                                       NITROGEN SLUG TEST
                                                       ASSEMBLY
                                                       G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                       TECH. MEMO. NO. 5

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 5                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 3
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
forces water from the riser casing into the surrounding formation.  As the water level in
the well decreases under a constant pressure, the total head (Transducer No. 1) decreases.
The total head will eventually return to the initial head value when the well water level
stabilizes.  The total head  above Transducer No. 1 now includes the pressure component
from the nitrogen gas.  At this point, the vent valve is opened to instantaneously release
the pressure head.  This is similar in effect to instantaneously removing a column of water
equal to the volume of water displaced by the gas.  The data logger records the rate at
which the water level within  the well recovers.

PVC SLUG METHOD

Equipment

The PVC slug method is similar to the nitrogen slug method except that a PVC slug is
inserted in  the well to displace the water. The PVC slug has a 1/2-inch hole drilled
through its center to allow the use of a pressure transducer for measuring and  recording
water levels.  The slug and test apparatus for this method are shown in Figure 3.

Procedure

The wellhead  assembly and transducer equipment are set up at the well location as shown
in Figure 3. The test equipment, including the PVC slug, is lowered into the water and
the water level within the  well is then allowed to stabilize.  Once the water level has
stabilized, the  slug is quickly removed from the well displacing a known volume from the
well.  The data logger records the rate at which the water level within the well recovers.


                            METHOD OF ANALYSIS

METHODOLOGY

Tests were evaluated using the Bouwer and Rice method (1976). The water levels in
GH03B, GH03C, GH29C, and GH31A, GH31B, and  GH31C were displaced below the top
of the screened interval during slug testing.  For these wells, the well radius was adjusted
to account  for a porosity change associated with the sand pack surrounding the well
screen.
The equation for estimating hydraulic conductivity is:

       K =  [rc2 * In (Re/rw)]/2L * 1/t * ln(yo/yt)

-------
                                                     Transducer
                                                     Cable
                                                                         Data Logger
String for
Pulling Slug
                                      ? h  = Head at time, t
                                      Eye Bolts
                                       = nQ = Head at time, tQ
                                      Riser Pipe
                                      Hollow
                                      PVC Slug
                                                            NOT TO SCALE
                                      Screen
                                                      L = Length of Test Zone
                                      Pressure
                                      Transducer
     r or r
= Radius of well L  »|
R or r   =  Radius of bore hole
                                                         FIGURE 3
                                                         PVC SLUG TEST
                                                         ASSEMBLY
                                                         G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                         TECH. MEMO. NO. 5

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 5                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 4
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
where

     K  = hydraulic conductivity [L/T]
     L  = length of test zone [L]
     t   = time measured from start of test [T]
     y0  = initial head difference  [L]
     yt  = head difference at time t [L]
     rc  = well radius [L] (corrected for porosity in the sand pack)
     Re = effective radial distance over which the head (y) is dissipated [L]
     rw  = radius of the borehole [L]

The value of the term In (Rg/rw) is determined graphically using curves by Bouwer and
Rice for empirical constants.

TECHNICAL RESULTS

Calculated values of hydraulic conductivities are  summarized in Table 1. A logarithmic
average of the three values at each well is included in Table 1.  The logarithmic average
was used because, statistically, hydraulic conductivity values generally have a logarithmic
distribution. Graphs of the test data and hydraulic conductivities calculated using the
Bouwer and Rice method are presented in Attachment 1.  Raw data and  data reduction
notes have been retained in the project files.

The ranges of calculated values of hydraulic conductivity are:

     •    3.7 x 10"2 to 4.8 x 10"4 cm/s, "A" wells screened in the upper sand unit
     •    1.0 x 10~3 to 1.6 x 10"4 cm/s, "B" wells screened in the upper sand unit
           1.0 x 10'5 to 8.2 x 10'5 cm/s, "C" wells in the till unit

DATA LIMITATIONS

The following assumptions are made in the theoretical development of the Bouwer and
Rice equations for analyzing slug test data:

     1.    Drawdown of the water table around the well is negligible.
     2.    Flow in the unsaturated zone can be ignored.
     3.    Well losses are negligible.
     4.    The aquifer is homogeneous and isotropic.

Assumptions 1, 2,  and 3 are probably satisfied at the  G&H Landfill site.   Assumption 4,
however, is satisfied neither locally nor sitewide.  Thus, each test is  actually an average of
the formation material in the immediate vicinity of each test  location.

-------
                                       Table 1
                          RESULTS OF VARIABLE HEAD TESTING
                              G&H Landfill Phase III RI
                             Technical Memorandum No.  5
                                      Hydraulic Conductivity (cm/s)
Well I.D.
GH03A
GH03B
GH03C
RD24
GH29A
GH29B
GH29C
GH31A
GH31B
GH31C
GH36B
Stratigraphic
Unit
Upper
Upper
Till
Upper
Upper
Upper
Till
Upper
Upper
Till
Upper
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Test 1
3.5
1.0
1.0
1.7
5.1
3.2
2.7
6.2
5.8
8.2
8.7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
io-2
io-3
io-5
io-4
io-4
io-4
io-5
io-4
io-4
io-5
io-4
Test 2
3.3
1.0
2.3
1.6
4.9
3.0
*5.0
6.3
5.8
*2.0
9.0
x ID'2
x 10'3
x ID'5
x ID'4
x ID'4
x ID'4
x 10'6
x ID'4
x ID'4
x 10'6
x ID'4
Test 3
3.7
9.2
2.4
4.8
3.8
9.4
6.9
9.8
x 10'2
x ID'4
x 1C'4
x ID'4
x ID'4
x 10'4
x ID'4
x ID'4 .
Log
Average
3.5
9.7
1.5
1.9
4.9
3.3
2.7
7.2
6.2
8.2
9.2
x ID'2
x IO-4
x 10'5
x 1C'4
x IO-4
x IO-4
x 10'5
x IO"4
x ID'4
x ID'5
x ID'4
* Unreliable data due to the unresponsiveness  of the well over the period it was
  tested.
GLT863/064.50

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 5                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 5
September 28, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FQ
There are additional limitations to calculated hydraulic conductivities at wells where water
level was displaced below the top of the screened interval.  An assumption in the analysis
is that the recovery is limited to within the well casing.  Because the recovery for these
cases takes place within the well screen and the filter pack, the recovered volume is
greater than that of the assumed well casing by the volume of the pore space of the filter
pack. By correcting the volume of the well casing to incorporate both the volume of the
screen and the porosity of the filter pack,  the standard  analysis can then be applied.  For
these cases, the effective screen length and the effective thickness of the aquifer  also
change as the well recovers.  There are no methods of analysis to account for these
changes.  Thus, the rising head data obtained from the  wells in which the water table
surface is below the  top of the screened interval are  less  accurate than data obtained from
wells in which the screened interval is entirely submerged.


                                   REFERENCE

Bouwer, Herman, and R.  C. Rice.  A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity  of
Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells.  Water Resources
Research.  Vol. 12, No. 3.  1976.


GLT863/063.50

-------
                   Technical Memorandum No. 5

                         Attachment 1
                  GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION
                        OF TEST DATA
GLT863/055.50

-------
LU
LU
    G   4  H   LRNDFILL
    GH-3R
    TEST 1
    O_
     0.0
16.0      2U.O
 TIME  (SECS)
           32.0
140.0
    K (CH/S)  = 0.031999
    HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
    SCREEN LENGTH =3.0
    WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
    HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
    RQUIFER THICKNESS =21.2
    H (FEET)  =8.70
COEFFICIENTS
fl =  2.59
B =  0.42
C =  0.00
Y-INTERCEPT =1.61
SLOPE = -0.1579

-------
 G  4   H  LflNDFILL
 GH-3R
 TEST 2
O_
10.0
20.0
 TIME
                                30.0
                             (SECS)
140.0
50.0
K CCM/S) = 0.032668
HELL SPECS. (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =3.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RfiDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
flQUIPER THICKNESS =21.2
H (FEET) =8.70
          COEFFICIENTS
          fl = 2.59
          8 = 0.12
          C = 0.00
          Y-INTERCEPT = 1.6U
          SLOPE = -Q.m74

-------
UJ
U_
    G   4  H  LflNDFILL
    GH-3R
    TEST 3
    O_
                                                       ID * o »
               14.0
8.0
 TIME
   12.0
(SECS)
16.0
20.0
    K (CM/S)  = 0.036530
    HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
    SCREEN LENGTH =3.0
    WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
    HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
    HQUIFER THICKNESS =21.2
    H (FEET)  =8.70
          COEFFICIENTS
          fl = 2.59
          B = 0.42
          C = 0.00
          Y-INTERCEPT = 1.84
          SLOPE = -0.1648

-------
 G  4  H  LflNDFILL
 GH-3B
 TEST 1
O _
  0.0
i±Q. 0       80.0     120.0
            TIME  (SECS)
160.0
200.0
 K (CM/S)  = 0.001029
 HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
 SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
 WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
 HELL CflSING RflDIUS =  0.08
 RQUIFER THICKNESS =21.3
 H (FEET)  =21.30
                    COEFFICIENTS
                    fl = 0.00
                    B = 0.00
                    C = 1.38
                    T-INTERCEPT = 7.51
                    SLOPE = -0.0079

-------
 G  &  H  LflNDFILL
 GH-3B
 TEST 2
O_
           50.0
100.0
  TIME
   150.0
(SECS)
200.0
250.0
K (CM/S) = 0.001011
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS =21.3
H (FEET) = 21.30
          COEFFICIENTS
          fl = 0.00
          B = 0.00
          C = 1.38
          Y-INTERCEPT = 5.86
          SLOPE = -0.0080

-------
  G  4  H  LflNDFILL
  GH-3B
  TEST 3
^-«
O _
  r—
  co-
  c\i-
  00-

  (O-
  10-
b
  0.0
50.0
100.0
 TIME
   150.0
(SECS)
200.0
250.0
 K  (CM/S) = 0.000915
 HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
 SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
 WELL SCREEN/BORE  RRDIUS = 0.37
 HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
 flQUIFER THICKNESS =21.3
 H  (FEET) = 21.30
                     COEFFICIENTS
                     fl = 0.00
                     B = 0.00
                     C = 1.38
                     T-INTERCEPT = 8.08
                     SLOPE = -0.0070

-------
     G  4  H  LflNDFILL
     GH-3C
     TEST 1
      c\i-
LU  CD
      co-
      co-
      in-
      00-
      0.0
80.0
160.0
2140.0
320.0
1400.0
                         TIME  (SECS)   *10
     K (CM/S)  = 0.000010
     HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
     SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
     WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
     HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
     RQUIFER THICKNESS = 91.0
     H (FEET)  = 13.20
                     COEFFICIENTS
                     fi =  1.92
                     B =  0.27
                     C =  0.00
                     Y-INTERCEPT = 1. 02
                     SLOPE = -0.0001

-------
LU
      G  £   H  LflNDFILL
      GH-3C
     TEST 2
    "o  _
      oo-
      to-
      in-
                10.0
  20.0      30.0
TIME  (SECS)   *102
4:0.0
50.0
     K (CM/S) = 0.000023
     HELL SPECS. (FEET)
     SCREEN LENGTH  =5.0
     WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
     HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
     RQUIFER THICKNESS = 91.0
     H (FEET) = 13.20
            COEFFICIENTS
            fl = 1.92
            B = 0.27
            C = 0.00
            Y-INTERCEPT = 3.23
            SLOPE = -0.0002

-------
G  £  H  LflNDFILL
RD-24
TEST 1
                                                     200.0
                   TIME  (SECS)    *10J
K (CM/S)  = 0.000173
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
flQUIFER THICKNESS = 29.0
H (FEET)  = 29.00
COEFFICIENTS
fl = 0.00
B = 0.00
C = 2.91
Y-INTERCEPT = 5.US
SLOPE = -0.0008

-------
 G  £   H  LflNDFILL
 RD-24
 TEST 2
O _
                                                      200.0
                     TIME  (SECS)  *10J
 K (CM/S) = 0.000157
 HELL SPECS. (FEET)
 SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
 WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
 HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
 RQUIFER THICKNESS = 29.0
 H (FEET) = 29.00
COEFFICIENTS
fl =  0.00
B =  0.00
C =  2.911
T-INTERCEPT = 14.77
SLOPE = -0.0008

-------
G  4  H  LflNDFILL
RD-24
TEST 3
                                                     100.0
                    TIME  (SECS)
K (CM/S)  = 0.000237
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RfiDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RfiDIUS =  0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 29.0
H (FEET)  = 29.00
COEFFICIENTS
fi = 0.00
B = 0.00
C = 2.91
Y-INTERCEPT = U. 67
SLOPE = -0.0012

-------
G  &  H  LRNDFILL
GH-29R
TEST 1
           80.0
160.0     2140.0
 TIME  (SECS)
320.0
400.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000512
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =6.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 18.1
H (FEET)  = 6.00
          COEFFICIENTS
          fl = 3.62
          B = 0.61
          C = 0.00
          Y-INTERCEPT = 3. HO
          SLOPE = -0.0041

-------
G   4  H  LflNDFILL
GH-29R
TEST 2
 0.0
20.0      140.0      60.0
        TIME  (SECS)
           80.0
100.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000193
WELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =6.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 18.1
H (FEET)  =6.00
COEFFICIENTS
fl = 3.62
B = 0.61
C = 0.00
Y-INTERCEPT = 3. 11
SLOPE = -0.0012

-------
G  £  H  LflNDFILL
GH-29R
TEST 3
           80.0
160.0     2140.0
 TIME  (SECS)
320.0
"400.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000«i82
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =6.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RRDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 18.4
H (FEET)  =6.00
          COEFFICIENTS
          fl = 3.62
          B = 0.61
          C = 0.00
          Y-INTERCEPT = 3.18
          SLOPE = -0.0011

-------
G  &  H  LflNDFILL
GH-29B
TEST 1
 0.0
20.0
iiO.0
60.0
                   TIME (SECS)   * 10
                                     i
80.0
100.0
K (CM/S)  » 0.000296
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 18. t
H (FEET)  = 18.110
                     COEFFICIENTS
                     fl = 0.00
                     B = 0.00
                     C = 2.91
                     Y-INTERCEPT = 5.63
                     SLOPE = -0.0015

-------
G  &  H  LflNDFILL
GH-29B
TEST 2
 0.0
20.0      140.0      60.0
        TIME  (SECS)
           80.0
100.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000315
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RfiDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
flQUIFER THICKNESS = 18.1
H (FEET)  = 18.10
COEFFICIENTS
fl = 0.00
B = 0.00
C = 2.91
Y-INTERCEPT = 5.29
SLOPE = -0.0016

-------
 G  £  H  LflNDFILL
 GH-29B
 TEST 3
O _
            80.0
160.0     2140.0
  TIME  (SECS)
          320.0
1400.0
 K (CM/S)  = 0.000376
 HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
 SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
 WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
 HELL CflSING  RflDIUS = 0.08
 HQUIFER THICKNESS = 18.1
 H (FEET)  = 18.HO
COEFFICIENTS
fl =  0.00
B =  0.00
C =  2.91
T-INTERCEPT = 1.77
SLOPE = -0.0020

-------
 G  4  H  LflNDFILL
 GH-29C
 TEST 1
O
  oo-
  CD-
  in-
                                                     200.0
                     TIME  (SECS)   *10
 K (CM/S) = 0.000027
 HELL  SPECS. (FEET)
 SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
 WELL  SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
 WELL  CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
 RQUIFER THICKNESS = 97.0
 H (FEET) = 12.10
COEFFICIENTS
fl =  1.92
B =  0.27
C =  0.00
Y-INTERCEPT = 3.56
SLOPE = -0.0003

-------
LU
>-
     G  4   H  LflNDFILL
     GH-29C
     TEST 2
    ru
    O
      co-
      r—
      =»<-
      c\i-
00-

(O-
10-
3«
CO

CM-
    o
    O
      0.0
liO.O       80.0      120.0
         TIME  (SECS)
                                          160.0
200.0
     K (CM/S) = 0.000005
     HELL SPECS. (FEET)
     SCREEN LENGTH  =5.0
     WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
     HELL COS ING RflDIUS = 0.08
     RQUIFER THICKNESS = 97.0
     H (FEET) = U2.HO
                               COEFFICIENTS
                               fl = 1.92
                               B = 0.27
                               C = 0.00
                               Y-INTERCEPT = 3.56
                               SLOPE = -0.0000

-------
LU
    G   4  H   LflNDFILL
    GH-31R
    TEST 1
    O_
     0.0
50.0      100.0     150.0
            TIME  (SECS)
          200.0
250.0
    K (CM/S)  = 0.000616
    HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
    SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
    WELL SCREEN/BORE RfiDIUS = 0.37
    HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
    RQUIFER THICKNESS = 30.0
    H (FEET)  = 10.UO
COEFFICIENTS
fl =  1.92
B =  0.27
C =  0.00
Y-INTERCEPT = 3.91
SLOPE = -0.0068

-------
LU
    G  4  H  LflNDFILL
    GH-31F)
    TEST 2
   O_
              50.0
100.0     150.0
  TIME  (SECS)
200.0
250.0
    K (CM/S)  = 0.000630
    HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
    SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
    WELL SCREEN/BORE  RflDIUS = 0.37
    HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
    RQUIFER THICKNESS = 20.0
    H (FEET)  = 10.10
          COEFFICIENTS
          fl = 1.92
          B = 0.27
          C = 0.00
          Y-INTERCEPT = 3.97
          SLOPE = -0,0070

-------
 G  4   H  LflNDFILL
 GH-31R
 TEST 3
O_
 0.0
140.0      80.0     120.0
            TIME  (SECS)
160.0
200.0
K (CM/S) = 0.000938
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 20.0
H (FEET) = 10.10
                    COEFFICIENTS
                    fl = 1.92
                    B = 0.27
                    C = 0.00
                    T-INTERCEPT = 3.58
                    SLOPE = -0.0101

-------
G  4  H   LRNDFILL
GH-31B
TEST  1
 0.0
80.0
160.0
  TIME
  340.0
(SECS)
320.0
1400.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000579
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
HELL CflSING RflDIUS =0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 20.0
H (FEET)  = 20.00
   COEFFICIENTS
   fl = 0.00
   B = 0.00
   C = 1.38
   Y-INTERCEPT = 6.70
   SLOPE = -0.0015

-------
G  £  H  LRNDFILL
GH-31B
TEST 2
 0.0
80.0      160.0     2140.0
            TIME  (SECS)
320.0
400.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000580
WELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RRDIUS = 0.37
HELL CflSING  RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 20.0
H (FEET)  = 20.00
                    COEFFICIENTS
                    R = 0.00
                    B = 0.00
                    C = 1.38
                    T-INTERCEPT = 7. 25
                    SLOPE = -0.0015

-------
G   4  H  LflNDFILL
GH-31B
TEST 3
 0.0
50,0      100.0     150.0
            TIME  (SECS)
200.0
250.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000686
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
flQUIFER THICKNESS = 20.0
H (FEET)  = 20.00
                    COEFFICIENTS
                    fl = 0.00
                    B = 0.00
                    C = 1.38
                    T-INTERCEPT = 6.67
                    SLOPE = -

-------
G  4  H  LRNDFILL
GH-31C
TEST 1
oo-
p—
oo-
CM-h
 0.0
80.0      160.0     340.0
         TIME  (SECS)
320.0
1400.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000082
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS =0.37
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 95.0
H (FEET)  = 20.30
                     COEFFICIENTS
                     fl = 1.92
                     B = 0.27
                     C = 0.00
                     T-INTERCEPT =1.27
                     SLOPE = -0.0009

-------
UJ
           H  LflNDFILL
    GH-31C
    TEST 2
   CM
   o_
   o.
     0.0
80.0
160.0
240.0
320.0
1400.0
                       TIME  (SECS)   3ilO
                                         i
    K (CM/S)  = 0.000002
    HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
    SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
    WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.37
    HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
    RQUIFER THICKNESS = 95.0
    H (FEET)  = 20.30
                    COEFFICIENTS
                    fl = 1.92
                    B = 0.27
                    C = 0.00
                    Y-INTERCEPT = 3.19
                    SLOPE = -0,0000

-------
G  4  H  LflNDFILL
GH-36B
TEST 1
 0.0
20.0
110.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
                   TIME  (SECS)   5610
                                     i
K (CM/S)  = 0.0008714
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
RQUIFER THICKNESS = 27.9
H (FEET)  = 27.90
                    COEFFICIENTS
                    fl = 0.00
                    B = 0.00
                    C = 2.94
                    Y-INTERCEPT = 5.62
                    SLOPE = -0.00113

-------
G  4  H  LRNDFILL
GH-36B
TEST 2
 0.0
80.0
160.0
 TIME
  240.0
(SECS)
320.0
1400.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000896
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING RflDIUS = 0.08
flQUIFER THICKNESS = 27.9
H (FEET)  = 27.90
                    COEFFICIENTS
                    fl = 0.00
                    B = 0.00
                    C = 2.91
                    Y-INTERCEPT = 5.32
                    SLOPE = -0.0041

-------
G  £  H  LflNDFILL
GH-36B
TEST 3
           80.0
160.0     240.0
 TIME  (SECS)
320.0
400.0
K (CM/S)  = 0.000979
HELL SPECS.  (FEET)
SCREEN LENGTH =5.0
WELL SCREEN/BORE RflDIUS = 0.08
HELL CflSING  RflDIUS = 0.08
flQUIFER THICKNESS = 27.9
H (FEET)  = 27.90
          COEFFICIENTS
          fl = 0.00
          B = 0.00
          C = 2.91
          T-INTERCEPT = 7.51
          SLOPE = -0.0018

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 6                     AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:     Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         Dean Charpentier/GLO
            Jeff Keiser/GLO

DATE:      December 1, 1989

SUBJECT:   G&H Landfill Close Support Laboratory Results

PROJECT:   GLO65561.FI.FC



                                INTRODUCTION

From May to July 1989, CH2M HILL operated a Close Support Laboratory (CSL) at the
G&H Superfund site. The CSL, equipped with a Hewlett-Packard 5890A gas
chromatograph with a flame  ionization detector (GC/FID), was used to analyze soil
samples for the following target compounds:

      Compound                           Method Quantification Limit

      Benzene                                        1 mg/kg
      Toluene                                         1 mg/kg
      Ethylbenzene                                    1 mg/kg
      Xylenes                                         1 mg/kg
      Naphthalene                                     1 mg/kg
      2-Methylnaphthalene                              1 mg/kg

These target compounds were selected based on available historical data from  previous
investigations at the site. The data quality objective (DQO) of the CSL was to provide an
onsite soil sample  screening analysis with quick turnaround to allow for informed and
timely field  decisions about where to set screens for monitoring wells and to determine
which soil samples to submit to the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) program for
complete target compound list (TCL) analysis. This technical memorandum addresses
both the usability of the resultant CSL data  and  compliance with the project data quality
objectives.  It also addresses the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) measures used
to assess data quality and  the usability of the data obtained at the site.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 6
Page 2
December 1, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FC
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                             ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Before onsite analysis, a site-specific method for analysis of the target compounds was
developed that met project objectives. The analytical procedure used is outlined in the
Close Support Laboratory Standard Operations Procedures Addendum to the Quality
Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Phase  III Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study at
the G&H site.  CSL staff employed standard gas chromatography methods to analyze soil
samples (EPA Method 3550 "Sonification Extraction" and Method 8000 "Gas
Chromatography Analysis," both found in SW846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, 3rd edition,  1986).

Before GC analysis, soil samples were extracted with the solvent methylene chloride.  The
solvent allowed for mass  transfer of organics from the sample  into the solvent. Once the
sample was extracted with solvent by physically agitating the solvent/sample mixture, the
resultant extract was used for GC analysis.
               G&H CSL DATA VALIDATION/DATA ASSESSMENT

The purpose of data validation is to characterize the weaknesses of questionable data and
to determine data usability.  QA/QC criteria were  evaluated quantitatively when these
criteria were specified in the analytical methods or as part of the project DQOs. If values
were not specified, a qualitative assessment was made using established data validation
procedures.

Overall, the data generated from the G&H CSL were determined 100 percent usable for
the data quality objectives specified  in the  SOW (e.g., screening analysis).  All CSL data
are summarized in Tables 1A and IB.  A discussion of the data  validation parameters
follows.
HOLDING TIMES

All samples and extracts were refrigerated from the time they reached the CSL until they
were analyzed.  All samples were extracted within 2 days (48 hours) of sampling.  All
extracts were analyzed within 2  days (48 hours) of extraction.  These holding times are
within QAPP requirements.

INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

Initial calibration consisted  of the analysis of a series of standards. A custom stock mixed
standard solution containing 2,000 jig/ml of each target compound was obtained from

-------
6/01/19
CH2« HILL
Held 1.0. CSL 1.0.
IP01-OI IDUPI
1P04-OI
tPOl-OI
TP04-02
IP02-OI
IP02-02
IPOI-OI
IP07-OI
1P06-OI
1POS-OI
TPOS-02
IP09-OI
1P1I-OI
TPI2-OI
1PI5-OI
TPI1-OI
>mpii-oi
1PI4-OI
1PI6-OI
IPI7-OI
TPOI-OI
ipig-oi
IPI9-OI
IP20-OI
IP 36-01
IP2I-OI
IP22-OI
IP21-OI
TP22-OI IDUP)
TP24-01
IP25-OI
IP15-OI
HIIP2S-OI
1P26-OI
1P1I-OI
IP29-OI
IP29-OI (DU>>
IP10-OI
IPJ7-OI
IHIP27-OI
IP28-OI
JP11-OI
IP12-OI
IP 10-01
(II BMDl -
4
1
1
5
9
II
10
12
11
14
IS
16
17
l>
14
20
21
22
21 .
24
25
26
27
21
29
10
11
12
14
11
IS
17
16
19
19
40
41
42
4S
46
47
41
49
SS
Below oethod Detection
CC BUNI
21
29
10
11
17
19
41
41
44
SI
SI
55
61
61
64
66
67
61
74
71
94
95
96
97
91
99
101
111
111
117
111
121
121
I2S
121
112
114
116
141
175
176
177
171
191
Halls
TABU IA
CIH CSl TEST PIT OAIA
Benzene Toluene
Matrix oale Analyzed Ing/kg) lug/kg)
SOIL
SOIL
SOU
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOU
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOU
SOU
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOIL
SOU
SOU
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
SOIL
SOIL
sou
sou

5/16/19
5/16/19
5/16/19
5/16/19
5/I6/B9
5/16/19
5/16/14
5/16/19
5/16/19
5/17/19
5/17/19
5/17/19
5/11/19
5/11/19
5/11/19
5/11/19
5/11/19
5/11/19
5/19/19
5/19/19
5/21/19
5/22/19
5/22/19
5/22/19
5/22/19
5/22/14
5/21/14
5/21/14
5/21/19
5/14/19
5/24/19
5/14/19
5/14/19
5/24/14
5/24/S4
5/25/19
5/15/19
5/15/19
5/15/19
5/10/19
5/10/19
5/10/19
5/10/19
5/11/19

BMOL
BMDl
BMOL
6.4 |
BMDl
0.6 |
145.0 |
BMDL
15.1 |
BMDL
4.1 J
BMOL
54.1 |
BMOL
171.1 J
•MM.
BMOl
BMDL
BMOl
BMOl
119.4 |
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
0.9 1
BMDL
BMDl
BMOl
BMDL
0.9 J
0.1 1
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDl
1.4 J
BMDl
BMDL
BMDl
6.1 1
11.7
BMOl
0.1 1

e«x
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
141. B |
7161.7 1
BMDL
2102.9 j
III. 9
770.2 |
1111. 1 |
1275.1 1
4.1 J
4711.4 |
BMDL
1.1
16.7 |
BMDL
BMDL
6111.0 |
BMDl
BMDL
0.1 |
BMDL
0.4 )
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
4.1
BMDL
11.6
04 |
BMOl
• J 1
II. 0 |
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
66.4
111.7 J
114.6
BMDL

[thy (benzene
(ng/kg)
BMDl
0.7 |
BMDL
45.1
BMDl
90.
1754. j
BMOL
1020. |
120.
112.
1062.
1147.
4.
1524.
24.
21.
641.
BMDL
15.4
2955.4
BMDl
BMDL
19 J
BMDL
7.1
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDl
7.9
BMDL
4.1 |
BMDl
BMDL
55.1
75.0
BMDL
BMDl
BMDL
107.0 J
140.4
751.9
BMDl

xylenei
lug/kg)
BMDL
1.1
BMDL
121 0
BMDL
151.5
2190.1 |
BMDL
1714.1 |
191.7
469. |
1124. |
1201. J
4. 1
2507 . |
11.0 |
41.4 |
1094.1 |
BMDl
21.1
6111.0 |
BMDL
BMDl
4.1 1
1.1 1
9.0
BMDL
BMW
BMDL
BMDL
6.7
BMDL
1.4 |
0.5 |
BMDl
41.1 J
111.9
BMDl
BMDl
BMDl
491.1 |
277.4 |
515.1
BMDL

Naphthalene
(•g/kg)
BMDL
0.4 |
BMDl
90.2 |
BMDL
11.4 J
191. 1 J
BMDL
155.1 |
1.1 |
61.1 J
115.6 J
616.9 J
64.1 |
911.8 |
9.1 |
11.1 J
244.5 |
BMDL
1.9 J
198.9 |
BMDl
BMDL
7.5 J
1.4 J
1.0 J
BMDL
BMDL
BMOl
0.7
6.1 J
BMDL
6.7 J
BMDl
1.6 J
41.0 |
57.8 |
2.1 |
BMDL
BMDl
125.1 J
51.4 |
BMDL
BMDL

(2) | - (slimed Concenliatlon
2-Me thy (naphthalene
(ng/kg)
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
61.2 |
BMDl
10.7 J
47.9 J
BMDL
140. 1 )
11.4 |
21.1 J
175.4 J
210.0 |
BMDl
479.6 J
1.7 |
85 J
17.7 )
BMDl
BMDl
190.5 1
159.2 )
BMDL
16.1 J
5.6 J
1.1 |
BMDL
BMDL
BMDl
BMDL
1.7 )
BMDl
21.1 )
6.0 |
8.8 J
15.6 J
11.6 J
BMDL
BMDL
BMDl
10.7 J
11.7 |
15.1 |
BMDl

Pige I ol I

-------
6/10/14
CH2M Hill
field 10
RB2S-OI
RB26-OI
RB27-OIA
RB27-OIB
RB27-OIC
RB27-02A
6827-026
RB21-OI
RB21-02
1X134 -01
RW24-02
RW24-02 (DU>)
RWIO-OI
RW2I-OI (16-18 )
RW2I-OI ( 18-20' 1
RW2I-OI (24-26' )
RW21-OI 114-16')
BW23-OI 1 14-20' I
BK23-02 <20-22'l
RWIO-OI (16-18 )
RD24-OI (14-26')
RD24-02 (33-36 5' (
CH21A-OI O'-ll'l
(H27A-OI O'-ll')
OO5A-OI (I)'- IS')
O117A-OI (4'-7'>
11*22-01 
CH-12-01 (4'-6'>
CH-12-0! (4'-6.S'>
CH-U-89 (4'-6'l
GH-L1-OI I4'-6'I
OWIB O -II)
CH4I8 (2T-21')
OH42B 1 14' -16')
014 2B (U'-20'>
OMSA-OI (IO'-I2' >
CH32A (6'-«'l
CH32A 
004B (9'-ll'>
OU4B dl'-ll')
CH-33B <9'-9.9')
(I) BMDI - Below Method
CSl ID
41
44
90
51
92
93
54
96
57
51
54
60
61
62
61
64
65
66
67
61
64
70
72
73
74
75
76
77
71
79
II
12
•1
14
•0
17
16
1*
19
90
91
92
95
96
97
91
99
too
101
102
101
104
105
106
107
tot
109
no
III
91
Detection
CC RlMf
117
IK
179
180
1(1
182
190
192
199
201
207
201
221
221
224
226
229
210
211
211
214
2»
244
246
247
241
249
251
291
294
256
257
251
259
264
266
267
261
269
270
271
272
279
210
211
212
214
219
216
290
291
294
295
296
247
291
100
101
102
106
Unit
TABLE IB
GIH CSl t£ST PIT DATA
Benzene
•alrli Date Analyzed on/kg)
sou
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
sou
sou
sou
sou
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOU
SOIL
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOIL
SOU
SOU
SOIL
SOU
SOU
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
SOIL
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
SOIL
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
SOIL
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL

9/25/19
9/25/19
9/10/19
9/10/19
5/10/19
5/30/89
9/11/19
9/11/19
5/11/19
6/01/19
6/01/19
6/01/19
6/06/19
6/06/19
6/06/19
6/07/19
6/07/19
6/07/19
6/07/19
6/01/19
6/01/19
6/01/19
6/15/19
6/15/19
6/15/19
6/15/19
6/19/19
6/19/19
6/19/19
6/15/19
6/15/19
6/15/19
6/15/19
6/19/19
6/16/19
*/ 16/19
6/16/19
6/16/89
6/16/19
6/16/19
6/16/19
6/16/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/14
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/22/19
6/21/19
6/21/19
6/21/19
6/29/19

BMX
B»DL
20 |
BMX
BMDL
B«OL
BMW.
I.I 1
B«Ol
BMX
BMDI
BMDI
BMX
BMX.
B«OL
B«Dt
BMX
BMDl
BMX
0.7 |
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
01 1
2.2 )
0.4 J
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
11 1
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX

Toluene Elhylbenzene
(•g/kg) (eg/kg)
BMX
4.6 J
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
1.1 1
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
56.4
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
261.0 |
477.0 j
10.0 1
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
CMX
BMX
965.0 |
1.4 |
0.4 |
1.1 I
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
8MX
BMX
BMDL
BMDL
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX

BMX
11 4 |
11 1
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
24.7
BMX
4.6 )
BMW.
BMDL
0.5 J
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMDL
10.0
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
116.0 I
165.0 I
11.7 |
BMX
BMDL
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
210.0 J
0.5 |
0.2 J
I.I I
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
BMX
BMDL
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMDL
BMX
BMX
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDl
BMOL

xylenes Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene
(•a/kg) (ig/kg) (ng/kg>
BMX
21.5 J
4.1 1
0.1 )
BMX
BMDL
BMX
24.4
BMX
4.6 |
BMDL
BMDL
0.6 |
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
(MX
17.0
(MX
(MX
(MX
BMX
(MX
(MX
211.0 I
259.0 |
16.9 J
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
BMX
152.0 t
0.7 |
0.2 )
1.6 J
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
(MX
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
(MX

(2) I - (Ulna led concentration
BMX
11 1
22 |
I.I J
BMX
BMX
BMX
29.1 1
BMX
4.6 1
BMDL
(MX
0.2 J
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
(MX
10.4
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
(MX
(MX
24.0 J
19.0 1
2.2 J
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
52.0 |
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
BMDL
(MX
BMX
(MX
(MX
(MX
(MX
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
Page I

(MX
121.4
(MX
BMDL
BMX
BMDL
(MX
3.2 J
(MX
(MX
BMX
BMDL
BMX
(MX
BMX
BMX
(MX
(MX
(MX
1.0 |
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
7.4 |
6.1 1
0.4 |
BMX
BMX
(MX
(MX
(MX
(MX
(MX
(MX
15.4 |
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
(MX
BMX
(MX
(MX
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
BMX
(MX
BMX
(MX
BMX
BMX
BMX



-------
       TABLE IB
CtH CSL TEST PIT DATA
CH2M Hill
field ID
CH-ll-OI 13.S'-4.S
CH43B-03 (20'-30'>
OI-8B-OI <4'-H'l
CH-BB-02 (14'- 16' )
CH-4-01
GH-4-02 
CH-40B-OI (4 -6 )
01-408-02 I IS-- 16'
CH-34A-OI (4'-6'l
CSl IO CC RLNf
') »4
II]
111
114
IIS
116
117
) 111
114
II) BMDL • Belo* Method Delect Ion
(I) I - Estimated Concenlcation
J07
310
}l>
11)
314
315
316
314
322
Hull
ftalrlx Date Analyzed
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
sou
SOIL
sou

6/24/>4
6/24/14
6/24/14
6/24/14
6/24/14
6/24/14
6/24/14
6/24/14
6/30/14

Benzene
(•g/tg)
B«DL
B«DL
B«Dl
But*
BMDL
BMW
B*Dl
B«Ol
B«Dl

Toluene Elhylbenzene
(•g/fcg) («g/kg)
B«Dl
B«DL
B«DL
BMX
BMOL
BMOl
BMX
BMW
BMW

BMOL
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMOl
BMW
BMW
BMOL
BMOl

xylenes
(•g/kg)
BMW
BMW
BMOL
BMOl
BMOl
BMOl
BMOl
BMOl
BMW

naphthalene 2-Methvlnaphthalene
(•g/kg) log/kg)
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMOl
BMOl
BMW
BMW
BMW
Page 2
BMOL
BMOL
BMDL
BMW
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
. BMDL
BMDL


-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 6
Page 3
December 1, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FC
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Supelco, Inc.  Mixed standards were prepared using Burdick and Jackson GC capillary
grade methylene chloride.  Standards were prepared in concentrations of 10.0 jig/ml,
5.0 jig/ml, 2.0 iig/ml, 1.0 pg/ml, and 0.5 jig/ml. A calibration curve for each compound was
then constructed by plotting standard concentration on the abscissa and the corresponding
area counts on the ordinate.   The plot showed the relationship between  the standard
concentration and area counts.

Between the low and high standards, the calibration curve should be linear; this region
defines the working linear range for the analysis.  The linearity of the working range is
determined by using least squares analysis to compute the correlation coefficient from the
calibration data.  The  correlation coefficient for a linear segment is 1.00. The instrument
was recalibrated if the correlation coefficient was less than 0.99.

Response factors for the FID were calculated initially using a five-level calibration
(0.5 jig/ml, 1.0 iag/ml, 2.0 yg/ml, 5.0 yg/ml, and 10.0 vg/ml for the target compounds).
Whenever a  change was made in the system, a new initial calibration was performed.  See
Figures 1, 2, 3, 4,  5, and 6 for illustrations of the initial calibration curves.

A continuing calibration  standard was analyzed before each set of samples and used to
calculate the concentration of the target analytes in each batch. To assess instrument
stability before sample analysis, the percent difference between the response  factor (RF)
for the initial standard and the continuing calibration response factor was calculated. The
criteria for continuing calibration RFs allowed for a +/-15 percent variance from the initial
calibration RF.  All continuing calibration criteria were met.

DETECTION LIMITS

The working ranges established for the target compounds were based on the anticipated
concentrations of the samples. The working range for the target compounds was 0.5 jig/ml
to 10.0 iig/ml.  The GC/FID  was able to separate and detect the 0.5 vg/ml standard for
each of the target compounds without interference.  An instrument detection  limit (IDL)
of 0.5  pg/ml was assumed.

The G&H CSL results indicate that compounds are often detected above the IDL but
below  the working range  for the  detector.  In such cases, compounds are qualitatively
identified but quantitatively suspect because the concentrations do not fall within the
working calibration range. Accordingly, these values are flagged with a "J," meaning
estimated.

-------
         FIGURE 1:  FID 5-POINT CALIBRATION
                     FOR BENZENE
     Thousands
  600
  500
  400
  300
  200
  100
    0
                                     (10.0, 561171
          r"2 - 0.9999
                 (5.0, 281530)
               (2.0, 117060)
          (1.0, 59721)
        (0.5, 38554)
.inearity Check
      Fit
                                     8
                    10
                  CONCENTRATION (ug/ml)
12
G&H CSL

-------
        FIGURE  2:  FID 5-POINT CALIBRATION
                     FOR TOLUENE
     Thousands
  700

  600

  500

  400

  300

  200

  100

    0
                             (10.0, 59415J
r'2 ' 0.9997
          (5.0, 296280)
        (2.0, 121180)
   (1.0, 58789)
 (0.5, 39236)
inearity Check
   Best Fit
     0
G&H CSL
              4        6        ft
           CONCENTRATION (ug/ml)
                   10
12

-------
         FIGURE 3: FID 5-POINT CALIBRATION
                 FOR ETHYLBENZENE
     Thousands
  700

  600

  500

  400

  300

  200

  100

    0
                           (10.0, 670806)
 r'2 - 0.9997
        (5.0, 33300
      (2.0, 134520)
  (1.0, 68188)
(0.5, 44405)
.inearity Check
   Best Fit
             2468
                 CONCENTRATION (ug/ml)
                                   10
                           12
G&H CSL

-------
         FIGURE 4:  FID 5-POINT CALIBRATION
                      FOR  XYLENES
      Thousands
  2500
  2000
   1500
   1000
   500
     0
          r'2 • 0.9997
           (10.0, 20763J
                  (5.0, 1033130L
               ^(2.0, 418750)
            (1.0. 209797)
         ^(0.5,139161)
Linearity Check
    Best Fit
                      468
                   CONCENTRATION (ug/ml)
                    10
12
G&H CSL

-------
        FIGURE 5:  FID  5-POINT CALIBRATION
                  FOR NAPHTHALENE
  600
  500
  400
  300
  200
  100
     Thousands
     0
G&H CSL
                                    (1.0, 581
         r*2 - 0.9998
                (5.0, 28667
  (2.0. 115250)
          (1.0, 56539 )
        (0.5, 34942)
inearity Check
   Best Fit
2468
     CONCENTRATION (ug/ml)
                   10
12

-------
        FIGURE 6:  FID 5-POINT CALIBRATION
            FOR 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
     Thousands
  500
  400
  300
  200
  100
    0
     0
G&H CSL
                                   (10.0, 48141
         r"2 - 0.9997
                (5.0, 240780)
(2.0, 96258)
          (1.0, 48887)
        (0.5,16821)
inearity Check

   Best Fit
      468
   CONCENTRATION (ug/ml)
                  10
12

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 6
Page 4
December 1, 1989
GLO65561.FI.FC
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
BLANK ANALYSIS

A blank sample containing only the extraction solvent was analyzed with each batch of
samples.  The amount of any target analyte in the blank was considered in determining
whether any analyte found in the sample could have come from the solvents. No blank
contaminant was found at a concentration greater than 10 percent of the analyte at the
reported detection limit;  therefore, no qualification of the data because of blank
contamination was necessary.  See Tables 1A and IB for  blank sample results.

MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 summarize the recovery of analytes detected in the matrix spike
and duplicate (MS/MSD) samples, and Table 8 summarizes field and laboratory duplicate
results.  For the MS/MSD  samples, the recovery  of analytes was within the specified
control limits set in the analytical method. In some cases, the recoveries were outside of
the  control limits because the samples chosen to  be spiked were highly contaminated. High
levels of organic compound background in highly contaminated samples caused  inaccuracy
in the integration, and therefore quantification, of the target compounds.  The recoveries
for the "clean" samples,  however, demonstrated the validity of the method.  As for the
duplicate analysis, most relative percent differences (RPDs)  between like samples were
within QC acceptable ranges defined in the QAPP.  Sample results with percent recoveries
or RPDs outside of the QC limits were flagged estimated (J).

Figures 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,  13,  14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 graphically depict the results of the
MS/MSD samples.

                                    SUMMARY

The following summarizes the  use  of the CSL at the G&H Landfill site:

       •     A total of 113 samples, including field replicates and blanks, were analyzed in
            the CSL.

       •     Many of the results were flagged estimated (J) because of concentrations
            being less than the method quantification  limit, MS/MSD percent  recoveries
            outside of control limits, or RPDs outside of control limits.
            All of the data were determined to be usable for the data quality objectives
            specified for this project.
GLT863/077.50

-------
                                      TABLE 2
                          SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR BENZENE OF
                        MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
CH2M HILL
ID
TP07-01MS
TP07-01MSD
TP16-01MS
TP16-01MSO
TP22-01MS
TP22-01MSO
TP27-01MS
TP27-01MSD
RB28-02MS
R828-02MSD
CH35B(26'-28- )MS
CH35B<26'-28' )MSD
01428(14' -16' IMS
CH42B(14' -16- )MSD
CH-B15-01(10-13)MS
CH-B15-01(10-13)MSD
CH-40B-OK41 -6' )MS
CH-40B-OK41 -6' )MSO
CSL
ID
12MS
12MSD
23MS
23MSO
3 IMS
31MSO
4 SMS
4SMSO
57MS
57MSD
84MS
84MSD
101MS
101MSD
92MS
92MSD
1 17MS
117MSO
DATE
5-17-89
5-17-89
5-19-89
5-19-89
5-23-89
5-23-89
5-25-89
5-25-89
5-31-89
5-31-89
6-16-89
6-16-89
6-22-89
6-22-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
PERCENT
RECOVERY (1)
102
112
92
89
95
95
92
91
38
90
105
89
83
92
103
87
84
108
RELATIVE
PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (2)
9.3%
3.3%
0.0%
1 . 1%
2.2%
16.5%
10.3%
16.8%
25.0%
(1)  EPA Method Acceptance criteria For % R is 39-150%
(2)  EPA Method Acceptance criteria For RPD is <40%
page 1  of 1

-------
                                      TABLE  3
                          SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR TOLUENE OF
                        MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX  SPIKE  DUPLICATE
CH2M HILL
10
TP07-01MS
TP07-01MSD
TP16-01MS
TP16-01MSO
TP22-01MS
TP22-01MSD
TP27-01MS
TP27-01MSD
RB28-02MS
RB28-02MSD
0)358(26' -28' )MS
CH35B<26' -28' )MSD
CH42B(14'-16f )MS
CH42B(14--16')MSD
CH-B15-OK 10-13)MS
CH-B15-01(10-13)MSD
CH-40B-OK4' -61 )MS
CH-40B-OK4' -61 )MSO
CSL
10
12MS
12MSO
23MS
23MSO
3 IMS
31MSO
4 SMS
4SMSO
57MS
57MSD
84MS
84MSD
101MS
101MSD
92MS
92MSO
1 17MS
117MSD
DATE f
5-17-89
5-17-89
5-19-89
5-19-89
5-23-89
5-23-89
5-25-89
5-25-89
5-31-89
5-31-89
6-16-89
6-16-89
6-22-89
6-22-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
PERCENT
iECOVERY (1)
94
97
91
85
97
99
89
91
91
93
97
69
83
93
90
85
68
91
RELATIVE
PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (2)
3. 1%
6.8%
2.0%
2.2%
2. 2%
33.7%
11.4%
5.7%
28.9%
(1)  EPA Method Acceptance  criteria For  % R is  46-148%
(2)  EPA Method Acceptance  criteria For  RPD is  <40%
page i ol 1

-------
                                      TABLE 4
                        SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR ETHYLBENZENE OF
                        MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
CH2M HILL
ID
TP07-01MS
TP07-01MSO
TP16- 01MS
TP16-01MSD
TP22-01MS
TP22-01MSD
TP27-01MS
TP27-01MSD
RB28-02MS
RB28-02MSO
CH35B(261-28- )MS
CH35BC26' -28' )MSO
CH42BU4' -16' )MS
CH42BC14--16' )MSD
CH-B15-01(10-13)MS
CH-B15-01(10-13)MSD
CH-40B-OK4' -6' )MS
CH-40B-OK4' -6' )MSD
CSL
ID
12MS
12MSD
23MS
23MSD
31MS
31MSD
4 SMS
45MSD
S7MS
S7MSD
84MS
84MSD
101MS
101MSO
92MS
92MSD
117MS
1 1 7MSD
DATE
5-17-89
5-17-89
5-19-89
5-19-89
5-23-89
5-23-89
5-25-89
5-25-89
5-31-89
5-31-89
6-16-89
6-16-89
6-22-89
6-22-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
PERCENT
RECOVERY ( 1 )
96
95
106
101
83
95
91
88
76
77
98
68
86
96
93
86
65
87
RELATIVE
PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (2)
1 .0%
4.8%
13.5%
3.4%
1 .3%
36. 1%
11.0%
7.8%
28.9%
(i)  EPA Method Acceptance criteria For % R is 32-160%
(2)  EPA Method Acceptance criteria For RPD is <40%
page 1 ol i

-------
                                      TABLE 5
                          SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR XYLENES OF
                        MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
CH2M HILL
10
TP07-01MS
TP07-01MSD
TP16-01MS
TP16-01MSO
TP22-01MS
TP22-01MSO
TP27-01MS
TP27-01MSD
RB28-02MS
RB23-02MSD
CH35B(26i-28i )MS
CH35B<26'-28i )MSD
CH42B(14' -16' )MS
CH42B(14'-16' )MSO
OH-B15-01{10-13)MS
CH-B1S-01(10-13)MSD
CH-40B-OK4- -6' )MS
CH-40B-OH4' -6' )MSD
CSL
10
12MS
12MSD
23MS
23MSO
3 IMS
31MSO
45MS
4SMSO
S7MS
57MSD
84MS
84MSO
10 IMS
101MSD
92MS
92MSD
117MS
1 1 7MSO
DATE 1
5-17-89
5-17-89
5-19-89
5-19-89
5-23-89
5-23-89
5-25*39
5-25-89
5-31-89
5-31-89
6-16-89
6-16-89
6-22-89
6-22-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
PERCENT
RECOVERY (1)
96
95
100
94
89
96
93
89
89
90
98
70
86
97
95
90
65
88
RELATIVE
PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (2)
1 .0%
6.2%
7.6%
4.4%
1 . 1%
33.3%
12.0%
5.4%
30. 1%
d) EPA Method Acceptance criteria For  % R is 60-140%
(2) EPA Method Acceptance criteria For  RPO is <40%
Page i of i

-------
                                      TABLE 6
                        SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR NAPHTHALENE OF
                        MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
CH2M HILL
ID
TP07-01MS
TP07-01MSD
TP16-01MS
TP16-01MSD
TP22-01MS
TP22-01MSD
TP27-01MS
TP27-01MSD
RB28-02MS
RB28-02MSO
CH358<26'-28' )MS
CH35B(26' -28' )MSO
CH42B(14- -16' )MS
CH42B(14' -16' )MSD
CH-B15-01 ( 10-13)MS
CH-B15-OK10- 13)MSD
CH-40B-OK4' -6' )MS
CH-40B-01 (4' -6' )MSD
CSL
ID
12MS
12MSO
23MS
23MSO
3 IMS
31MSD
4 SMS
45MSO
57MS
57MSD
84MS
84MSO
10 IMS
101MSO
92MS
92MSO
1 17MS
1 1 7MSD
DATE
5-17-89
3-17-89
5-19-89
5-19-89
5-23-89
5-23-89
5-25-89
5-25-89
5-31-89
5-31-89
6-16-89
6-16-89
6-22-89
6-22-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
PERCENT
RECOVERY ( 1 )
85
93
78
79
94
96
90
91
89
92
103
68
81
95
94
85
62
83
RELATIVE
PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (2)
9.0%
1 .3%
2. 1%
1 . 1%
3.3%
40.9%
15.9%
10. 1%
29.0%
(D  EPA Method Acceptance Criteria For % R is 0-122%
(2)  EPA Method Acceptance criteria For RPO is <40%
Page 1  of 1

-------
                                          TABLE 7
                        SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE OF
                            MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
CH2M HILL
ID
TP07-01MS
TP07-01MSD
TP16-01MS
TP16-01MSD
TP22-01MS
TP22-01MSD
TP27-01MS
TP27-01MSD
RB28-02MS
RB28-02MSD
CH35B<26'-28- )MS
CH35B(26' -28' )MSD
CH42B(14' -16' )MS
CH42B(14' -161 )MSD
CH-B15-01(10-13)MS
CH-B15-01 ( 10-13)MSD
CH-40B-OK4- -6' )MS
CH-40B-OK4--6' )MSD
CSL
ID
12MS
12MSD
23MS
23MSD
31MS
31MSD
4 SMS
4SMSD
57MS
S7MSD
84MS
84MSD
10 IMS
101MSD
92MS
92MSD
1 I7MS
1 1 7MSD
DATE 1
5-17-89
5-17-89
5-19-89
5-19-89
5-23-89
5-23-89
5-25-89
5-25-89
5-31-89
5-31-89
6-16-89
6-16-89
6-22-89
6-22-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
6-29-89
PERCENT
RECOVERY (1)
86
50
76
79
32
70
88
90
76
91
87
61
78
82
100
75
47
76
RELATIVE
PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (2)
52.9%
3.9%
74.5%
2.2%
18.0%
35. 1%
5.0%
28.6%
47.2%
(1)  EPA Method Acceptance criteria For  % R is D-122%
(2)  EPA Method Acceptance criteria For  RPD is <40%
Page 1 of 1

-------
CH2M HILL CSL ID Benzene
Field ID
TP03-01 3
TP03-01 (DUP) 4
BMDL (1)
BMDL
TABLE 8
C*H LANDFILL
RPD CALCULATIONS
Toluene Ethylbenzene
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
xylenes Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
RPD (2) 	 --- --- --- 	
TP13-01 20
FRTP13-01 21
RPD
TP22-01 31
TP22-01 (DUP) 34
BMDL
BMDL
...
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
1.2
...
BMDL
BMDL
24.1
28.5
16.7
BMDL
BMDL
38.0
41 .9
9.8
BMDL
BMDL
9.8
13.3
30.3
BMDL
BMDL
8.7
8. 5
2.3
BMDL
BMDL
RPD
TP25-01 35
FRTP25-01 36
RPD
TP29-01 40
TP29-01 (DUP) 41
RPD
TP27-01 45
FRTP27-01 46
0.2
BMDL
...
BMDL
3.4
...
BMDL
BMDL
9.8
21 .6
75.2
8.3
11.0
28.0
BMDL
BMDL
7.9
4. 1
63.3
55.1
75.0
30.6
BMDL
BMDL
6.7
3.9
52.8
93.2
123.9
28.3
BMDL
BMDL
6. 1
6.7
9.4
41 .0
57.8
34.0
BMDL
BMDL
8.7
22.3
87.7
15.6
21.6
32.3
BMDL
BMDL
RPD 	 	 	 	 	 	
RVY24-02 59
RW24-02 (DUP) 60
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
RpD 	 ...
CH28A-01 (9--11-) 72
CH28A-01 (9'-11')DUP 720
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
RPD 	 	
CH35B (26' -28' ) 84
CH35B (261 -281 ) DUP 85
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMOL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
RPD 	
CH42B (141 -16' ) 101
CH42B (14--161) DUP 101D
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
RPO 	
CH40B-02 (151 - 16' ) 118
CH40B-02 (15' - 16' ) 1 18D
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
BMDL
RPD 	 	 	 	 	 	
(1) BMDL - Below Method Detect
(2) RPO - Relative Percent oif
ion Limits
ference



Page i of i


-------
    FIGURE 7: CONTROL CHART FOR BENZENE
     MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES
     PERCENT RECOVERY
IOU
140
120
100'
80
60
40 <
20
r\

-
-
n ° 5
a ffi 


-------
        FIGURE 8:  CONTROL CHART FOR BENZENE
                MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

    RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
  50


  40


  30


  20
                                    D
 D
I I I I
              lllllTllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiii
   0
   5/17    5/24     5/31     6/7    6/14     6/21    6/28
                    TIME (month/day)
                           KEY

                D RPD DATA  — QC LIMIT (40%)
G & H CSL

-------
         FIGURE 9:  CONTROL CHART FOR TOLUENE
          MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES
     PERCENT RECOVERY
160
140
120
100
 80
 60
 40
 20
       a
       +
                    ,
                    m
                   .
                   +
                   D
                                     +
                                                   D
    5/17    5/24    5/31     6/7     6/14    6/21     6/28
                      TIME (month/day)
       D  MS DATA
       -B- QC Limit (46)
   KEY
MSD DATA
QC Limit (148)
                                      100 % Recovery
G & H CSL

-------
  50
  40
  30
  20
  10
        FIGURE 10: CONTROL CHART FOR TOLUENE
                MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

    RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
                                    D
                                                  a
                                          a
      a
    (i
     llillTlTlllllTllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
   5/17    5/24     5/31    6/7     6/14     6/21    6/28
                     TIME (month/day)
                D
        KEY

RPD DATA  — QC LIMIT (40%)
G & H CSL

-------
             FIGURE 11:CONTROL CHART FOR ETHYLBENZENE
           MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

      PERCENT RECOVERY
   200
   150
   100
    50
                                                        ¥
                                                        a
                                                         -u
       I I I  I I I I I I I  I I I I I I  I I I I I I I  I I I I I I  I I I I I  I I I I I I I  I I I
    5/17     5/24     5/31     6/7      6/14     6/21     6/28
                        TIME (month/day)
                               KEY
        D  MS DATA         +  MSD DATA
        -*-  QC Limit (32)     ^^ QC Limit (160)
100 % Recovery
G & H CSL

-------
      FIGURE 12:CONTROL CHART FOR ETHYLBENZENE
                MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

    RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
  50
  40
  30
  20
  10
   0
                                   D
          D
                                          D
      D
            D
     I I I I I I  I I  I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I  I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
   5/17    5/24    5/31     6/7     6/14    6/21     6/28
                    TIME (month/day)
                          KEY

                D  RPD DATA   — QC LIMIT (40%)
G & H CSL

-------
    FIGURE 13:  CONTROL CHART FOR XYLENES
     MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX  SPIKE DUPLICATES
     PERCENT RECOVERY
  160
140
120
100
 80
 60
 40
 20
 0

      1 1 1 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1  II
    5/17    5/24    5/31     6/7    6/14    6/21    6/28
                   TIME (month/day)
                         KEY
       D  MS DATA       + MSD DATA      — 100 % Recovery
      -a- QC Limit (60)   -*- QC Limit (140)
G & H CSL

-------
        FIGURE 14:  CONTROL CHART FOR XYLENES
                MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

    RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
  50
  40
  30
  20
  10
                                          n
          o
      D
            D
                                                  D
    H I I I I  I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I  I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I  I I I I I
   0
   5/17    5/24     5/31    6/7    6/14     6/21    6/28
                     TIME (month/day)
                           KEY
                D RPD DATA
QC LIMIT (40%)
G a H CSL

-------
       FIGURE 15: CONTROL CHART FOR NAPHTHALENE
          MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES
     PERCENT RECOVERY
I4U
120
100
80'
60
40
20
r\ i

o
4 « ft + ?
'- * •>
+ D
-
,111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II,
    5/17    5/24     5/31    6/7     6/14     6/21    6/28
                      TIME (month/day)
       Q  MS DATA
       -»- QC Limit (0)
   KEY
MSD DATA
QC Limit (122)
100 % Recovery
G & H CSL

-------
      FIGURE 16: CONTROL CHART FOR NAPHTHALENE
                MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

    RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
  50
  40
                                    D
  30

  20

  10dr
                                       a
                                a
                                       a
     i u i i  i
9 . (D
                   a
   0
   5/17    5/24
       5/31     6/7     6/14    6/21
          TIME (month/day)
6/28
                           KEY
                D RPD DATA
                    QC LIMIT (40%)
G & H CSL

-------
              FIGURE 17: CONTROL CHART FOR
              2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE MS/MSD
140
120
100
 80
 60
 40
 20
  0
     PERCENT RECOVERY
                    D
      I I  I I I I  I I I I 1 I  1 1 1 1  1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1  1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1  II
    5/17    5/24     5/31     6/7     6/14    6/21     6/28
                      TIME (month/day)
       D  MS DATA
       -a- QC Limit (0)
                          KEY
                    + MSD DATA
                    -*- QC Limit (122)
100 % Recovery
G & H CSL

-------
             FIGURE 18: CONTROL CHART FOR
                 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
    RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
  80
  60
  40
  20
          D
                                                 D
                                                 D
                   D
   5/17    5/24    5/31     6/7     6/14    6/21     6/28
                    TIME (month/day)
                          KEY

                D  RPD DATA   — QC LIMIT (40%)
G & H CSL

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 7
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:     Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         Jan Williams/GLO

DATE:      December 14,  1989

SUBJECT:  Round 2 Field Sampling
            G&H Landfill  Phase III RI

PROJECT:  GLO65561.FI.FQ
            GLO65561.FLFW
                                INTRODUCTION

From July 24 through August 3, 1989, groundwater, surface water, sediment, and leachate
samples were collected as part of the Round 2 field investigation of the Phase III remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at the G&H Landfill site.  Round 2 field activities
consisted of source testing with test pit excavation, soil boring and sampling, monitoring
well installation and development, surface water and sediment sampling, groundwater
monitoring well sampling, leachate sampling, hydraulic testing, landfill gas emission and
ambient air sampling, and surveying and mapping.

This technical memorandum summarizes groundwater monitoring well sampling, and
surface water, sediment,  and leachate sampling field activities. Water level measurements
were taken concurrently  with monitoring well sampling.
                                  OBJECTIVES

The general objectives of the Phase III field activities were to collect additional data for
evaluating public health risks from site contaminants and to develop and evaluate remedial
action alternatives for the site.  Specific objectives were to:

      •     Collect data to support and complete a quantitative risk assessment

      •     More accurately  estimate the size and characteristics of the contaminant source
           area and to help in selection and evaluation of remedial alternatives that will
           contain, reduce, remove, or destroy contaminant  sources

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 7
Page 2
December 14, 1989
GLO65561.FI
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
      •     Improve the understanding of site hydrogeology to evaluate potential
           contaminant pathways for selecting remedial alternatives

Additional task-specific objectives for groundwater, leachate,  sediment, and surface water
sampling are to:

      •     Explore possible contaminant  migration pathways to the Clinton River from
           leachate seeps from the Phase III landfill area

      •     Explore the extent of sediment contamination in ditches along Ryan Road
           south of the site and in and around the seep area including the migration of
           nonaqueous phase liquids from the original landfill area and deposition of these
           liquids  in the seep area

      •     Determine the lateral and vertical extent of contamination in groundwater at
           and around the site

      •     Present the potential relationship between contaminant source and release
           points by comparison of groundwater and leachate analysis
                                    APPROACH

To meet the foregoing objectives, 74 monitoring wells were sampled. Samples were
obtained from all of the 48 new monitoring wells installed as part of the Round 2,
Phase III RI/FS.  The 26 existing monitoring wells  sampled were chosen to reaffirm
previous analytical results, to provide additional information for the  risk assessment, and to
achieve the specific objectives for groundwater analysis  listed previously. Sediment, surface
water, and leachate samples,  and water level measurements were also taken to achieve  the
objectives.  Specific data quality objectives are detailed  in the Quality Assurance Project
Plan (QAPP) dated September 30, 1988.
                                   PERSONNEL
CH2M HILL personnel and their responsibilities during the investigation were:

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 7
Page 3
December 14, 1989
GLO65561.FI
                    AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     Team Member

     Isaac Johnson
     Jeff Keiser
     Jan Williams

     Cathy Kantowski
     Bryan Laude
     Hugh Allerton
     Dale Cira
     Dody Holloway
     Chris  Ohland
Responsibility

Project Manager
Assistant Project Manager
Sample Team Member,
  Site Safety Coordinator
Sample Team Member/Documentation
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Individuals from Warzyn Engineering were onsite from July 31 to August 3 to sample wells
they had installed under a contract with Michigan Department of Natural Resources in
1988. Personnel from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources also visited the site
to oversee the Warzyn sampling effort.  George McPhearson from Science Applications
International Corporation was onsite July 26 to split a groundwater sample from
well RW14 for use in a treatability study being conducted by U.S. EPA Headquarters.
                              FIELD ACTIVITIES
Groundwater samples were collected between July 24 to 28.  Leachate, sediment, and
surface water samples were collected between July 31 to August 2.  Samples were
submitted to laboratories in the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program  (CLP) for
Routine Analytical Services (RAS) and Special Analytical Services (SAS) parameters.
RAS parameters consisted of Target Compound List inorganic analytes, volatile and
semivolatile organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs.  The SAS parameters requested
were oil and grease, BOD, COD, TOC, total phosphate, TDS, alkalinity,  chloride,
ammonia, nitrate plus nitrite and sulfate.  SAS analysis was also requested for volatile and
semivolatile organic compounds, pesticides, PCBs, and inorganic analytes  for samples with
visible oil.  The various media sampled and their corresponding analytes  are found in
Table 1.

Detailed sampling procedures, equipment descriptions, and responsibilities are discussed in
the approved QAPP and approved Revision 4 to the QAPP, dated  March 3,  1989.
Revisions 1, 2,  and 3 were incorporated in the original  QAPP. All  sampling was
conducted as described in the QAPP, except for the necessary field modifications described
herein.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.
Page 4
December 14,  1989
GLO65561.FI
                         AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                                      Table 1
                            SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
                       Monitoring Wells
TCL Organic Compounds

TAL Inorganic Analytes

Oil and grease, BOD,
COD, TOC, TDS, total
phosphate, alkalinity,
chloride, ammonia,
nitrate plus nitrite,
and sulfate

SAS Organic Compounds

SAS Inorganic Analytes
X

X

X
Leachate

    X

    X
Surface Water

      X

      X
Sediment

    X

    X
X

X
                   X

                   X
                    X

                    X
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING

Groundwater samples were collected from 26 existing monitoring wells and all 48 recently
installed wells at the site between July 24 and 28.  Sampling locations are shown in
Figure 1.

Nine replicates, eight field blanks, and six trip blanks were collected as QA/QC checks.
Trip blanks were prepared at the CH2M HILL warehouse in Milwaukee using high
performance  liquid chromatography (HPLC) water.  They were carried to the field and
shipped to the laboratory with the samples for volatile organic compound analysis. Field
blanks were prepared by pouring HPLC water into decontaminated bailers for organic
compounds and metals or commercial  deionized water into decontaminated bailers for
conventional  parameters and transferring it to appropriate sample containers.  All blanks
were preserved and handled as if they were actual samples.  The field blank  sample for
metals was filtered.

Static water levels were measured before samples were collected  using an electronic water
level indicator (Table 2). The volume of standing water was calculated from  the water
level measurement and the well depth. Monitoring wells that were adequately recharging
were purged  of at least five well volumes before sampling.  Wells that did  not recharge
sufficiently were bailed dry, allowed to recharge, and then sampled on the  same day. All
wells were purged using stainless steel  or disposable PVC bailers.  The disposable bailers

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                    H-
                                                                   V^:x::-....... •GH15B.C
                                           ^  ;: \\  ;:    "    RWSO
                                           \\  i62:1.:-::"::':::*¥:-"K:::i::;"":
                                            l\  ;'*:.
                                                           .RD18
                                                   GH16B.C
                                                          •      23-r&LC
                                                  	X   	 X	X     x    '
                                                                                                                                                                                      GH14A.C,
                                                                                               RL06
                                                                                                                  RL04
                                                                                                                                                                     GH17A.B  \l 1
                     QL.01
                                 PHASE HI
                                  \NDFJLL
***.. GH37A
••..*'%.
                              RW24
                              RD24
   RW05       ti;


PHASE \ LANDFALL

            • RW21
                                                                                                                                                             AUTOhSOBJLE
                                                                                                                                                              DISPOSAL
                                                                                                                                                          GH28A.B,
                                    RL29
                          o\
                          L02 •:•
                                                       RW22
                                                       •
                                                              RW10
                                                                           RW23  ::i.
                                                                                                                RD08XX
                            \ C>U03
                                                                          RL17
H LAMDRLL
                                      GH31A.B.C j \
                                                       RW11
                                                                                                                RW14
                                                                I05

                                                                                                   GH41B*
                                                                                 GH32A
                                                                                                                    GH40A,B\
                                                                                                                             "
                                                                                                                            GH39A
                                                                                        "LJ
                                                                                              > GH03B.C
                                                                     GH45A
                                                            "\
                                                                                                                           GH43A.B
                                                                  \
                                                                   \
                                                                                              GH36A.B ^   H  IK
                                                                                                     •  i i S  <
                                                                                                                                                                  R     """"^	^
                                                                                                                                                                  .D  j	•^-~--~^v-:
                                                                                                                                                                              ^
                                                                      ,B
                                                                                                                                                                    AREA
                                                                                                                                               ^<3H12A,B   |{ •GH29AvB,C
                                                                                                                                                         .GH26A
                                                                           GH34A;B>.......,,..

                                                                            .--"   •-"  .-•••'" "'!.••'
                                                                                                                                                                             ,--v
                                                                                                                                                                                     /•
                                                                                                                                                                                                             North
                                                                                                                                        t
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      300
                                                                                                                                                                                                         APPROXIMATE
                                                                                                                                                                                                         SCALE IN FEET
                                                                                                                            LEGEND

                                                                                                                       .:.:.:.:.:1:.:.:.xx:.:x .:.:•><.:..:.  LANDFILL BOUNDARY


                                                                                                                       x	x	x	x  U.S. EPASITE FENCE


                                                                                                                              *(         GATE
                                                                                                                              4
                                                                                                                                        DITCH, STREAM, OR
                                                                                                                       '"    .......•"   	   RIVER


                                                                                                                        :;:•-	 ....; ::~ ::    TRAIL


                                                                                                                                        RAILROAD GRADE
                                                                                                                       :;	 ;:	;:   (TRACKS REMOVED)


                                                                                                                                        MONITORING WELL
                                                                                                                             •          SAMPLING LOCATION


                                                                                                                                        LEACHATE WELL
                                                                                                                             O          SAMPLING LOCATION
S
s
o
                                                                                                                     GH08B
                                                                                                                                                           22 - WLE JRO&O'
                                                                                                                                FIGURE 1
                                                                                                                                MONITORING WELL AND
                                                                                                                                LEACHATE WELL
                                                                                                                                SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                                                                                G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                                                                TECH. MEMO. NO 7

-------
Page 1 of 3
                       Table 2
              GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
               G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
              Technical Memorandum No. 7
Well
Number
GH01A
GH01B
GH01C
GH02A
GH02B
GH02C
GH03B
GH03C
GH04A
GH04B
GH04C
GH06A
GH06B
GH07A
GH08A
GH08B
GH08C
GH09A
GH09B
GH11B
GH14A
GH14B
GH14C
GH15A
GH15B
GH15C
GH16A
GH16B
GH16C
GH17A
GH17B
GH18B
GH19A
GH19B
GH20A
GH20B
GH21A
GH22A
GH22B
GH23A
GH25A
GH26A
Date
Recorded
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
Top of Casing
Elevation (a)
( ft msl )
688.80
688.60
690.20
686.70
688.34
688.20
687.93
687.22
689.00
688.61
691 .00
695.42
695.40
684.42
683.24
684.40
683.60
688.15
687.61
696.20
(b)
704.45
704.50
707.31
707.33
707.66
710.07
708.44
709.28
705.28
704.41
707.11
696.03
697.59
690.02
689.89
688.94
692.04
692.72
668.94
687.17
690.64
Depth to
Water Below
Top of Casing
(ft)
6.85
6.60
20.18
3.75
5.62
19.07
6.05
5.83
dry
18.52
23.67
9.48
9.47
9.61
11.42
12.11
15.02
8.79
8.38
9.87
7.85
7.96
32.32
dry
14.25
48.82
15.39
13.98
33.32
14.04
13.05
12.07
6.91
8.56
7.00
6.99
casing bent
3.88
38.63
14.31
5.14
6.46
Water level
Elevation
( ft msl )
681.95
682.00
670.02
682.95
682.72
669.13
681.88
681.39
	
670.09
667.33
685.94
685.93
674.81
671.82
672.29
668.58
679.36
679.23
686.33
	
696.49
672.18
	
693.08
658.84
694.68
694.46
675.96
691 .24
691.36
695.04
689.12
689.03
683.02
682.90
	
688.16
654.09
654.63
682.03
684.18

-------
Page 2 of 3
                       Table 2
              GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
               G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
               Technical Memorandum No. 7
Well
Number
GH27A
GH28A
GH28B
GH29A
GH29B
GH29C
GH30A
GH30B
GH31A
GH31B
GH31C
GH32A
GH33A
GH33B
GH34A
GH34B
GH35A
GH35B
GH36A
GH36B
GH37A
GH38A
GH39A
GH40A
GH40B
GH41B
GH42B
GH43A
GH43B
GH44A
GH45A
I05
L01
L02
L03
RD02X
RD08XX
RD18
RD24
RL04
RL06
RL10
Date
Recorded
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
Top of Casing
Elevation (a)
( ft msl )
704.89
701 .48
701.87
694.83
693.96
695.47
697.28
697.18
696.98
697.70
697.35
691.81
688.93
688.79
688.11
687.75
697.71
697.63
695.56
696.17
695.06
700.55
686.73
687.41
687.47
688.33
689.64
691.19
692.32
691.69
693.43
697.24
673.02
669.42
663.18
708.30
707.93
71 1 .07
708.04
708.31
709.90
709.93
Depth to
Water Below
Top of Casing
(ft)
11.38
9.85
10.2
9.01
10.46
9.7
9.58
9.52
9.51
10.25
33.2
7.54
4.97
4.51
6.81
5.71
11.62
11.55
4.79
5.3
4.92
12.36
3.47
4.35
4.4
2.54
4.63
11.45
12.39
11.82
13.61
10.36
5.06
9.03
3.51
14.60
20.85
19.62
16.62
15.60
17.90
16.08
Water level
Elevation
( ft msl )
693.51
691.63
691.67
685.82
683.50
685.77
687.70
687.66
687.47
687.45
664.15
684.27
683.96
684.28
681.30
682.04
686.09
686.08
690.77
690.87
690.14
687.19
683.26
683.06
683.07
685.79
685.01
679.74
679.93
679.87
679.82
686.88
667.96
660.39
659.67
693.70
687.08
691.45
691 .42
692.71
692.00
693.85

-------
Page 3 of 3
                           Table 2
                 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
                  G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                 Technical Memorandum No. 7
Well
Number
RL17
RL21
RL22
RL23
RL29
RW05
RW07
RW10
RW14
RW19
RW21
RW22
RW23
RW24
RW30
Date
Recorded
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
Top of Casing
Elevation (a)
(ftmsl)
709.27
710.42
709.42
707.10
710.18
710.45
709.06
709.80
706.69
71 1 .70
710.69
709.49
707.65
709.24
712.65
Depth to
Water Below
Top of Casing
(ft)
21.41
dry
dry
14.61
28.32
20.70
17.89
15.16
23.16
19.76
19.82
19.53
17.77
17.82
20.33
Water level
Elevation
( ft msl )
687.86
	
	
692.49
681.86
689.75
691.17
694.64
683.53
691 .94
690.87
689.96
689.88
691 .42
692.32
(a) Top of casing measurements refer to inner casing (riser) without PVC coupling.
   MSL is referenced to a USGS datum.
(b) No top of casing elevation is available.
	Not applicable

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.
Page 5
December 14, 1989
GLO65561.FI
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
were used to sample wells with visible oil or nonaqueous layers. Purge volumes were
measured by emptying the bailer into a 5-gallon bucket and counting the number of
buckets filled.

Three wells were found  to have visible nonaqueous or oil layers in them.  102 had a thin
oil layer with oil globules floating on top of the water.  RW05 had a layer of yellow-dark
brown viscous oil several inches thick.  RW11 had a layer of black oil. An aqueous and a
nonaqueous fraction was obtained from wells RW05 and 102.  Only a nonaqueous fraction
sample was obtained from well RWll as the PVC dedicated bailer became caught in the
well after sampling  the nonaqueous fraction and could not be retrieved.  These samples
were handled and shipped as high hazard samples for SAS analysis according to the
provisions of the QAPP.

The field crew was  unable to sample wells GH16A AND GH21A because the well casings
were bent.   Wells GH15A, RL21, RL22, and RL23 were dry, therefore, no sample was
obtained.

Wells were sampled immediately after purging using the same bailer as used for purging
the well. The nylon cord suspending each bailer was discarded between each well.  A
VOA vial was filled as the first sample from each full bailer. A sample for field
parameters was collected in a separate bottle and returned to the sample preparation area
immediately after sampling for testing. The results of field parameter testing are
presented in Table  3.

Following sample collection,  the bottles were returned to the sample preparation area,
decontaminated in a trisodium phosphate and tap water solution and rinsed with deionized
water.   The metal samples were filtered and the samples were preserved according to the
provisions of the QAPP. After preservation, samples were placed in iced coolers. Sample
custody was maintained  by the CH2M HILL project team until samples were shipped to
the designated CLP laboratory. Table 4 summarizes  sample numbers, types, dates of
shipment, and collection and laboratory destinations.

LEACHATE SAMPLING

All three leachate wells  were sampled on July 31 and August 1. Sampling  locations are
shown in Figure 2.  One replicate, one field blank, and one trip blank were collected.
Preparation and treatment of blanks was as described for the monitoring well sample
collection, except the  leachate well metal samples and the leachate metal field blank were
not filtered.

Well volume calculation, purging of the wells, and sample collection and  preparation
proceeded  as described  for the monitoring well sampling.  A disposable PVC bailer was
used to purge and sample the leachate wells.  All leachate well samples were considered
low concentration samples. Table 5 lists sample number and types, dates of shipment,  and
collection and laboratory destinations.

-------
Page 1 of 3
                                            Table 3
                              MONITORING WELLS FIELD PARAMETERS
                                   G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                   Technical Memorandum No. 7
Well
Number
GH01A
GH01B
GH02A
GH02B
GH03B
GH03C
GH08B
GH09A
GH09B
GH11B
GH12A
GH12B
GH14A
GH14C
GH15B
GH15C
GH16B
GH16C
GH17A
GH17B
FRGH17B
GH18B
GH19A
GH19B
GH24A
GH26A
GH27A
GH28A
GH28B
GH29A
GH29B
GH29C
Date
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-26-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-27-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
Temperature
(C)
18
14
24
24
22
25
23
27.1
27.8
18
17
16
24
NR
18
20
23
19
16
16
16
23
16
14
18
20
17
22.9
21.7
20
20
21
Specific
Conductivity
pH (umhos/cm
(SU) at 25 deg. C)
7.2
7.24
7.28
7.32
7.08
8.85
7.53
7.47
7.29
7.25
6.85
7.79
7.4
NR
8.24
9.8
8.24
9.67
7.52
7.58
7.57
7.47
7.23
7.44
6.42
6.72
6.84
7.43
7.7
7.07
7.65
8.63
1163
603
1327
1224
1383
310
833
1248
1231
872
1190
1341
1837
NR
698
511
438
148
1098
427
427
521
1098
577
1279
1333
833
835
589
1111
567
307
Purge
Volume
(gallons)
2
8
6
18
16
13
5
3
8
5
6
22
6
18
17
21
10
12
8
28
(a)
25
6.5
21
6
6
3
4
24
5
12
20
Comments/Observations
Purged dry after 2 gallons, rusty brown
Purged dry after 8 gallons, water was slightly sandy, grey
~
--
Water was clear
Purged dry after 13 gallons, turbid
Water was silty, grey-brown
Water was turbid
Water was clear
Water was clear, slight organic, oil odor
—
—
—
Purged dry after 18 gallons, water was clear to slightly turbid
Water was turbid
Water was clear
Purged dry after 8 gallons
Purged dry after 10 gallons
Water was very rusty
Water was slightly turbid with grey tint, musky organic odor
--
Water was clear to slightly turbid
~
Water was clear
—
Septic, organic odor
Water was clear to slightly turbid
—
Water was turbid
Water was silty, grey
Water was light brown, silty
Purged dry after 20 gallons

-------
Page 2 of 3
                                           Table 3
                             MONITORING WELLS FIELD PARAMETERS
                                   G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                  Technical Memorandum No. 7
Well
Number
GH30A
FRGH30A
GH30B
GH31A
FRGH31A
GH31B
GH31C
GH32A
GH33A
FRGH33A
GH33B
GH34A
GH34B
GH35A
GH35B
GH36A
GH36B
GH37A
GH38A
GH39A
GH40A
FRGH40A
GH40B
GH41B
GH42B
FRGH42B
GH43A
GH43B
GH44A
GH45A
102
105
Specific
Conductivity
Temperature pH (umhos/cm
Date (C) (SU) at25deg. C)
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
26
28
27
17
17
17
17
15
18
22
17
13.8
14
15
15
16
16
26
18
22
20
19
20
22
16
16
22.5
22
20
14
NM
19
6.72
6.69
6.78
6.6
6.64
6.74
10.43
6.99
6.85
6.79
6.88
7.45
7.35
6.49
6.81
7.24
7.12
7.2
6.58
7.15
7.28
7.22
7.19
7.21
7.07
7.12
7.34
7.17
7.33
7.17
NM
6.67
1863
1792
1731
2024
2024
2262
440
1875
1512
1489
1667
1289
590
1500
1125
2805
2439
1167
1628
851
1422
1443
1500
1170
732
732
737
1250
1333
1282
NM
2159
Purge
Volume
(gallons)
4
(a)
12
4.5
(a)
12
5
6
8.5
(a)
17
7
18
3
11
12
16
3
7
9
9
(a)
18
20
18
(a)
4
15
5
2
4
5
Comments/Observations
Water was turbid
—
Water was clear
~
—
Water was clear
Purged dry after 5 gallons, water was turbid
Water was silty, grey-brown
Water was clear
—
—
Water was slightly turbid
—
Water was light brown
Water was light brown
Water was silty, red-orange
Water was clear to slightly turbid
Purged dry after 3 gallons, water was turbid, silty, organic, septic odor
Water had petroleum sheen, dark grey, slightly silty
Water was grey brown, silty to slightly turbid
Water was grey-brown, silty
--
Water was slightly silty, grey
—
—
—
Water was milky, light brown-grey
Water was light grey with small oil droplets
Water was brown and turbid
Water was slightly turbid
Thin oil layer
Water was turbid, grey with organic waste odor

-------
Page 3 of 3
                                                      Table 3
                                    MONITORING WELLS FIELD PARAMETERS
                                           G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                           Technical Memorandum No. 7
Well
Number
RD08XX
RD18
RD24
FRRD24
RL04
RL06
RL17
RL29
RW05
FRRW05
RW10
RW11
RW14
RW21
RW22
RW23
RW24
RW30
FRRW30
FB05
Date
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-26-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
Temperature
(C)
19
20
21
22
25
25
24
23
NM
NM
16
NM
15
16
21
16
20
21.3
23.2
30.5
Specific
Conductivity
pH (umhos/cm
(SU) at 25 deg. C)
7.25
7.23
7.58
7.52
6.33
6.49
6.88
6.73
NM
NM
6.13
NM
6.61
6.68
6.57
6.81
6.48
7.31
7.3
8.06
909
1233
543
532
1900
2600
1276
2500
NM
NM
2561
NM
1875
1159
870
854
889
1080
985
9
Purge
Volume
(gallons)
16
20
9
(a)
2.5
2
6.5
7
4
(a)
3
4
7
4.5
5
6
21.5
4
(a)
NA
Comments/Observations
Water was clear to slightly turbid with grey sediment at bottom of well
Water was slightly silty, grey to clear
—
—
Water was clear and foaming
Water was black with oil sheen, septic odor
Black flecks in water, septic odor
Purged dry after 5 gallons, water was turbid, light brown, strong odor
Yellow-brown viscous oil layer
~
Purged dry after 3 gallons
Black oil layer
Organic odor
—
Water was dark brown silty
Water was clear
—
Water was rusty pink-brown
—
—
NOTE:
    FR - Field Replicate
    NM - Not measured, oil layer in well
    NR - Not recorded
    NA - Not applicable
    (a) The field replicate samples were taken immediately after collection of the
      initial sample bottles. The well was not purged between initial and field
      replicate sample collections.
    ~ No comments/observations recorded

-------
Page 1 of 4
                                                       Table 4
                                             SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                                   MONITORING WELLS
                                                 G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                Technical Memorandum No. 7
                                                                                            Laboratory
Sample Number
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH01A
GH01B
GH02A
GH02B
GH03B
GH03B
GH03C
GH03C
GH08B
GH09A
GH09A
GH09B
GH09B
GH11B
GH12A
GH12B
GH14A
GH14C
GH15B
GH15C
GH16B
GH16C
GH-GW GH17A
GH-GW
GH-FR
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH-GW
GH17B
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
GWGH17B-02
GH18B
GH19A
GH19B
GH24A
GH26A
GH27A
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
OTR No.
EDF88
EDA61
EDF81
EDF82
EDA49
—
EDA52
—
EDF80
EDA46
--
EDA47
—
EDF61
EDF76
EDF75
EDF79
EDF62
EDA62
EDA63
EDF68
EDF67
EDA60
EDA58
EDA59
EDF71
EDF65
EDA54
EDF54
EDF89
EDA57
ITR No.
MEAC88
MEAA61
MEAC81
MEAC82
MEAA49
—
MEAA52
—
MEAC80
MEAA46
—
MEAA47
—
MEAC61
MEAC76
MEAC75
MEAC79
MEAC62
MEAA62
MEAA63
MEAC68
MEAC67
MEAA60
MEAA58
MEAA59
MEAC71
MEAC65
MEAA54
MEAC54
MEAC89
MEAA57
SAS No.
4733E
—
E19
—
E42
E07
—
£03
—
E41
E08
—
E04
—
—
—
E39
E40
—
E20
E21
—
—
E18
E16
E17
--
E50
E12
—
—
E15
Collection
Date
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-26-89.
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-26-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-27-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
Time
0705
0920
1055
1105
1425
1425
1500
1500
1052
1245
1245
1250
1250
1430
1030
0650
0845
1404
0915
0940
0910
0927
0739
0832
0832
1105
1220
0730
0810
0715
0835
Shipment
Date
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-25-89
Organics,
Pesticides,
PCBs
ENCOT
COMPU
ENCOT
ENCOT
COMPU
—
COMPU
~
ENCOT
COMPU
~
COMPU
—
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
COMPU
COMPU
ENCOT
ENCOT
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
ENCOT
ENCOT
COMPU
EMSI
ENCOT
COMPU
Metals
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
--
ENSECO
—
ENSECO
ENSECO
—
ENSECO
—
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
SKINER
ENSECO
ENSECO
Conventional
Parameters
__
ICM
—
ICM
—
ICM
—
ICM
ICM
—
ICM
—
ICM
—
—
ICM
ICM
—
ICM
ICM
—
—
ICM
ICM
ICM
—
ICM
ICM
—
—
ICM

-------
Page 2 of 4
                                                        Table 4
                                              SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                                     MONITORING WELLS
                                                 G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                 Technical Memorandum No. 7
                                                                                              Laboratory
Sample Number
GH-GWGH28A -02
GH-GW GH28B -02
GH-GWGH29A -02
GH-GW GH29B -02
GH-GW GH29C -02
GH-GW GH30A -02

GH-FR GWGH30A-02
GH-GW GH30B -02
GH-GW GH31A -02
GH-FR GWGH31A-02
GH-GW GH31B -02
GH-GW GH31C -02
GH-GW GH32A -02
GH-GW GH33A -02
GH-FR GWGH33A-02
GH-GW GH33B -02
GH-GW GH34A -02
GH-GW GH34A -02
GH-GW GH34B -02
GH-GW GH34B -02
GH-GW GH35A -02
GH-GW GH35B -02
GH-GW GH36A -02
GH-GW GH36B -02
GH-GW GH37A -02
GH-GW GH38A -02
GH-GW GH39A -02
GH-GW GH40A -02
GH-FR GWGH40A-02
GH-GW GH40B -02
GH-GW GH41B -02
OTRNo.
EDA64
EDA67
EDA77
EDA78
EDA76
EDA74

EDA75
EDA73
EDA80
EDA81
EDA82
EDA83
EDF77
EDF93
EDF94
EDF95
EDA48
—
EDA51
—
EDF55
EDF56
EDA55
EDA56
EDA68
EDA86
EDF70
EDA84
EDA85
EDA87
EDF66
ITRNo.
MEAA64
MEAA67
MEAA77
MEAA78
MEAA76
MEAA74

MEAA75
MEAA73
MEAA80
MEAA81
MEAA82
MEAA83
MEAC77
MEAC93
MEAC94
MEAC95
MEAA48
—
MEAA51
—
MEAC55
MEAC56
MEAA55
MEAA56
MEAA68
MEAA86
MEAC70
MEAA84
MEAA85
MEAA87
MEAC66
SAS No.
4733E
E22
E25
E32
E33
—
E30

E31
E29
E35
E36
E37
—
—
E46
E47
—
E06
—
E09
—
—
—
E13
E14
E26
—
—
—
—
E38
--
Collection
Date
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89

7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
Time
1115
1140
1350
1420
1445
1410

1410
1440
0715
0715
0700
0815
1050
0930
0930
0945
1237
1232
1452
1452
0830
0820
0710
0720
1150
0800
1025
0900
0900
0920
0950
Shipment
Date
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89

7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
Organics,
Pesticides,
RGBs
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
V
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
COMPU
—
COMPU
—
EMSI
EMSI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
Metals
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO

ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
—
ENSECO
—
SKINER
SKINER
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
Conventional
Parameters
ICM
ICM
ICM
ICM
—
ICM

ICM
ICM
ICM
ICM
ICM
—
_.
ICM
ICM
—
—
ICM
—
ICM
—
—
ICM
ICM
ICM
—
—
—
--
ICM
—

-------
Page 3 of 4
                                                       Table 4
                                             SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                                   MONITORING WELLS
                                                G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                Technical Memorandum No. 7
                                                                                            Laboratory
Sample Number
GH-GWGH42B -02
GH-FR GWGH42B-02
GH-GWGH43A -02
GH-GWGH43A -02
GH-GWGH43B -02
GH-GW GH43B -02
GH-GWGH44A -02
GH-GW GH44A -02
GH-GW GH45A -02
GH-GW 102-02*
GH-GW 102-02'
GH-GW 105-02
GH-GW RD08XX-02
GH-GW RD18-02
GH-GW RD24-02
GH-FR GWRD24-02
GH-GW RL04-02
GH-GW RL06-02
GH-GW RL17-02
GH-GW RL29-02
GH-GW RW05-02*
GH-GW RW05-02'
GH-FR GWRW05-02*
GH-FR GWRW05-02'
GH-GW RW10-02
GH-GW RW1 1-02"
GH-GW RW14-02
GH-GW RW21-02
GH-GW RW22-02
GH-GW RW23-02
GH-GW RW24-02
OTR No.
EDF52
EDF53
EDA45
—
EDA44
—
EDA43
—
EDA53
EDF49
EDF50 (Oil)
EDF90
EDF78
EDF84
EDF96
EDF97
EDF98
EDF99
EDF85
EDF86
EDF44
EDF48 (oil)
EDF46
EDF47 (Oil)
EDF57
EDF51 (Oil)
EDA79
EDF58
EDF91
EDF59
EDF92
ITRNo.
MEAC52
MEAC53
MEAA45
—
MEAA43
—
MEAA42
—
MEAA53
MEAC49
MEAC50 (Oil)
MEAC90
MEAC78
MEAC84
MEAC96
MEAC97
MEAC98
MEAC99
MEAC85
MEAC86
MEAC44
MEAC48(oil)
MEAC46
MEAC47 (oil)
MEAC57
MEAC51 (Oil)
MEAA79
MEAC58
MEAC91
MEAC59
MEAC92
SAS No.
4733E
—
—
EOS
—
E02
—
E01
—
E11
—
—
—
—
—
E48
E49
—
—
E44
—
—
—
—
~
—
—
E34
—
—
—
E45
Collection
Date
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-26-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
Time
0800
0800
1035
1035
1017
1017
1135
1135
0627
0916
0916
0845
0958
1405
0815
0815
1035
1015
1345
1438
1038
1038
1038
1038
0910
0803
0657
0900
0705
0930
0800
Shipment
Date
7-28-89
7-28-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
7-28-89
8-04-89
7-26-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
7-28-89
7-27-89
Organics,
Pesticides,
PCBs
EMSI
EMSI
COMPU
—
COMPU
—
COMPU
—
COMPU
AATS
AATS
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
EMSI
AATS
COMPU
EMSI
ENCOT
EMSI
ENCOT
Metals
SKINER
SKINER
ENSECO
~
ENSECO
—
ENSECO
—
ENSECO
JTC
JTC
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
JTC
JTC
JTC
JTC
SKINER
JTC
ENSECO
SKINER
ENSECO
SKINER
ENSECO
Conventional
Parameters
—
—
—
ICM
~
ICM
~
ICM
ICM
—
~
—
—
—
ICM
ICM
—
—
ICM
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
ICM
—
—
—
ICM

-------
                                                               Table 4
                                                    SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                                           MONITORING WELLS
                                                       G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                       Technical Memorandum No. 7
                                                                                                         Laboratory
Sample Number
GH-GW RW30-02
GH-FR GWRW30-02
GH-GW FB05-02
GH-GW FB05-02
GH-GW FB06-02
GH-GW FB07-02
GH-GW FB08-02
GH-GW FB09-02
GH-GW FB10-02
GH-GW FB11-02
GH-GW FB12-02
GH-GW TB01 -02
GH-GW TB02-02
GH-GW TB03-02
GH-GW TB04-02
GH-GW TB05-02
GH-GW TBO6-02
FR - Field Replicate
FB - Field Blank
TB - Trip Blank
* - High Concentration
OTRNo.
EDA65
EDA66
EDA50
—
EDA69
EDA70
EDF83
EDF87
EDF69
EDF72
EDF60
EDA71
EDA72
EDF73
EDF74
EDF63
EDF64



Sample
ITRNo.
MEAA65
MEAA66
MEAA50
—
MEAA69
MEAA70
MEAC83
MEAC87
MEAC69
MEAC72
MEAC60
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA




SAS No.
4733E
E23
E24
E10
—
E27
E28
E43
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
--




Collection
Date
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-28-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89




Time
1115
1115
1336
1336
1126
1200
1315
1355
1130
1120
1120
1440
1450
1300
1400
1500
1520




Shipment
Date
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-28-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-27-89




Organics,
Pesticides,
PCBs
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
—
COMPU
COMPU
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
EMSI
COMPU
COMPU
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT
ENCOT




Metals
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
—
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
SKINER
—
—
~
—
—
—




Conventional
Parameters
ICM
ICM
—
ICM
ICM
ICM
ICM
~
. —
—
—
—
—
—
—
~
—




COMPU - CompuChem Laboratories, NC
EMSI - Environmental Monitoring and Services, CA
ENCOT - Environmental Control Technology Corporation, Ml
ENSECO - Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical, CO
ICM - Industrial Corrosion Management, NJ
SKINER - Skinner and Sherman. Inc., MA

-------
                                        Tables
                            SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                      LEACHATE, SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT
                              G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                              Technical Memorandum No. 7
Laboratory
Sample Number
GH-LL01-01
GH-FRLL01-01
GH-LL02-01
GH-LL03-01
GH-LL01-02
GH-LL02-02
GH-LL03-02
GH-FBLL04-01
GH-LLTB06-01
GH-SW01-02*
GH-SW02-02*
GH-SW03-02*
GH-SW04-02*
GH-SW05-02'
GH-FRSW05-02"
GH-SW06-02*
GH-FRSW06-02*
GH-FBSW03-02*
GH-SD01-02*
GH-SD01-02*
GH-SD02-02*
GH-SD02-02*
GH-SD03-02*
GH-SD03-02*
GH-FRSD03-02*
GH-FRSD03-02*
GH-SD04-02*
GH-SD04-02*
GH-SD05-02
GH-SD06-02
GH-SD07-02*
GH-SD07-02'
GH-SD08-02*
GH-SD08-02*
GH-SD09-02
GH-FRSD09-02
GH-SD10-02
GH-SD11-02
GH-SD12-02
GH-SD13-02
GH-SD14-02
GH-SD15-02
GH-SD16-02
GH-SD17-02
Collection
OTRNo.
EDF29
EDF32
EDF30
EDF31
EDF34
EDF35
EDF37
EDF33
EDF45
EDF21 (oil)
EDF22
EDF23 (Oil)
EDF24
EDF25 (Oil)
EDF38
EDF26
EDF27
EDF28
EDFOO
	
EDF01
—
EDF02
	
EDF07
	
EDF03
	
EDF04
EDF05
EDF06
—
EDF09
	
EDF11
EDF10
EDF12
EDF13
EDF14
EDF15
EDF16
EDF17
EDF18
EDF19
ITRNo.
MEAC29
MEAC32
MEAC30
MEAC31
MEAC34
MEAC35
MEAC37
MEAC33
	
MEAC21 (oil)
MEAC22
MEAC23 (Oil)
MEAC24
MEAC25 (Oil)
MEAC38
MEAC26
MEAC27
MEAC28
MEACOO
	
MEAC01
	 •
MEAC02
	
MEAC07
	
MEAC03
	
MEAC04
MEAC05
MEAC06
	
MEAC09
	
MEAC11
MEAC10
MEAC12
MEAC13
MEAC14
MEAC15
MEAC16
MEAC17
MEAC18
MEAC19
Date
7-31-89
7-31-89
7-31-89
7-31-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
8-02-89
Time
1130
1130
1230
1445
815
750
735
840
1105
1410
1415
1600
900
845
845
825
825
1000
1430
1430
1530
1530
835
835
835
835
1140
1140
1210
1215
1240
1240
1300
1300
1340
1340
1400
1545
1600
1605
1610
1620
1645
1740
Shipment
Date
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-01-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-04-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
8-03-89
Organics,
Pesticides,
RGBs
3RIVER
3RIVER
3RIVER
3RIVER
3RIVER
3RIVER
3RIVER
3RIVER
3RIVER
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
AATS
AQUAI
	
AQUAI
	
AQUAI
	
AQUAI
	
AQUAI
	
COMPU
COMPU
AQUAI
	
AQUAI
	
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
Metals
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
—
JTC
JTC
JTC
JTC
JTC
JTC
JTC
JTC
JTC
	
JTC
—
JTC
—
JTC
—
JTC
—
JTC
ENSECO
ENSECO
—
JTC
	
JTC
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
ENSECO
FR - Field Replicate
FB - Field Blank
TB - Trip Blank
* - High Concentration Sample
3RIVER - Three Rivers Analytical, PA
AATS - American Analytical and Technical Services, OK
AQUAI - Aquatec, Inc., VT
COMPU - CompuChem Laboratories, NC
ENSECO - Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical, CO
JTC - JTC Environmental Consultants, MD
YORK - York Laboratories, CT

-------
                   SD04 /
                    A :-:'
                       X
                                  PHASE !H
                                 LANDFILL
                                      \  .,.
                                                                             --';:;••.••."''"•'••••••-•.•...
                                                                               *~ S *'-;•;•;••...!.!"''''''•••••••••••••.•.•....
._-,	,,,,,,,,,.....™,-,23 - ^5LE
                                                                                                                                                                   — x	— x	~ x—\ x
*r""'"*™'| ijo ]1
...... ."" ., : "; •. x ;:
:•:: i; : AUTO^OBSLE \ \
i S •:. - DISPOSAL. *:j
I " i:- VABD i ;

North
0 300
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
                                                              r\
                                                                                                                             KaN&^ss ^ J A^n^H i
                                                                                                                             s s J*^wiw * 6w.ff^.*'«W> si«.i«
                                                                                                                                SW01,SW02,SD01

                                                                                                                                SW03, SD02


                                                                                                                                SW05


                                                                                                                                SW06, SD03   S	x		x-


                                                                                                                                  C*^^- SW04
                       ^^ ?


                       I  I   ?
                         •:   >.%•!
                         ;   iK
                         i   <
 -.-:                     x  :: :|   ^

-•V-"-;:::;---x	:-x:::;	x	=  | [   <
                        . .   i«
                     \   .H  K
                                                                                                                                                                         AREA
                                                                                                                                                                                    >
                                                                                                                                                                                    s:
                                                                                            ^8017
                                                                                                                                                   SD06 '
                                                                    \
                                                                      \
                                                                                LEGEND

                                                                              ,.,^:.K:,:,,:,,,.,.<.,.  LANDFILL BOUNDARY

                                                                                x	x	x  U.S. EPA SITE FENCE

                                                                                  «v.         GATE
                                                                                  4
                                                                                            DITCH, STREAM, OR
                                                                                .,,..'•   RIVER


                                                                              •....,. ••-; •::." •    TRAIL

                                                                                            RAILROAD GRADE
                                                                                  '       ::   (TRACKS REMOVED)
                                                                                                                                                                                                     SD01
                                                                                                                                                                                                    SW01
                                                                                            SEDIMENT SAMPLING
                                                                                            LOCATION


                                                                                            SURFACE WATER
                                                                                            SAMPLING LOCATION
                                                                                                                                                                                                   NOTE: LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
o
o
                                                                                                                                                                               SD15+
                                                                                        FIGURE 2
                                                                                        SURFACE WATER AND
                                                                                        SEDIMENT SAMPLING
                                                                                        LOCATIONS
                                                                                        G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                        TECH. MEMO. NO. 7

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 7
Page 6
December 14, 1989
GLO65561.FI
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

Six surface water and 17 sediment samples were collected at the site on August 1 and 2
(Figure 2).  In addition, two replicate sediment samples and two replicate and  one field
blank surface water samples were collected.  The surface water field blanks were prepared
by pouring HPLC water directly into the appropriate sample containers. All blanks were
preserved and handled as if they were actual samples.

Surface water samples were collected using a glass container attached to a 5-foot wood
dowel. Three nonaqueous  phases or oil samples and three aqueous samples were
collected from the oil seep area.  A dark black oil or nonaqueous layer floating on the
water in the seep ponds was sampled at three locations.  Aqueous fractions were collected
from beneath the oil layer.  These samples were handled and shipped as high hazard
samples for SAS analysis according to  the provisions of the QAPP.  Samples were
decontaminated as previously noted  for monitoring well samples, and preserved according
to the QAPP at the sample preparation area. The metal samples were not filtered.

Sediment samples were collected using the glass container attached to the wood dowel or
a stainless steel trowel depending on the access  to the  sampling location. Sediment grab
samples were collected from the top 6  inches of soil, placed in sample jars decontaminated
as previously noted for monitoring well samples, and then iced in a cooler per  the QAPP.
Six sediment samples were  collected from the oil seep  area, the perimeter of the seep
area,  and the leachate seep east of the Phase III landfill and handled as high hazard
samples for SAS analysis according to  the provisions of the QAPP.  Eleven low
concentration sediment samples were collected from the ditch along Ryan road, the
Clinton-Kalamazoo canal, and downgradient of the oil  seep area.  Sample number and
types, dates of shipment, and collection and laboratory destinations for both surface water
and sediment samples are found in Table 5.

DECONTAMINATION PRACTICES

Groundwater Sampling Equipment

Stainless steel bailers used  for sampling wells were decontaminated between sample
locations.  Bailers were washed with a trisodium phosphate and tap water solution, a
10 percent methanol and water solution, and rinsed with deionized water and air dried.

Sediment and Surface Water Sampling Equipment

The glass container and trowels were washed and rinsed  with the identical solutions as the
groundwater sampling equipment  between all sampling locations.
GLT863/066.50

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:     Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         Bryan Laude/GLO

DATE:      January 22, 1990

SUBJECT:  Landfill Gas and Ambient Air Sampling
            G&H Landfill Phase III RI

PROJECT:  GLO65561.FI.FA
            GLO65561.FI.FG
                               INTRODUCTION

This technical memorandum summarizes the results of landfill gas and ambient air
sampling as part of the Round 2 and 3  field investigation of the Phase III remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at the G&H Landfill site.

OBJECTIVES

The general objectives of the Phase III  field activities were to collect additional data for
evaluating public health risks from site contaminants and to develop and evaluate remedial
action alternatives for the site.  Task-specific objectives for  the landfill gas and ambient air
sampling are:

      •     Collect  data to support and complete a quantitative risk assessment

      •     Investigate the concentrations and migration patterns of the landfill gas and
            determine if soil gas is migrating to the surrounding offsite soil

      •     Assess ambient air conditions on and around  the site and evaluate whether
            current  site conditions present a risk to site visitors and residents living near
            the site

      •     Evaluate the air quality impact from the aeration pond in the  seep area

      •     Evaluate whether excavating the landfill contents will present air quality risks
            to nearby residences

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 2
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI
APPROACH

To meet the objectives, two 5-day ambient air sampling events for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) were conducted. Tenax and carbon molecular sieve tubes were used
in parallel to sample for VOCs, according to EPA Methods TO-1 and TO-2.  The VOCs
and their associated detection limits are listed in Table 1.  One sampling event was
performed during a period of no site activity to assess ambient air conditions on and
around the site.  The other sampling event occurred during the excavation of the test pits
to assess the effect this activity would have on the ambient air quality.  The five locations
sampled each day included a location upwind of the site, a location  at the nearest
downwind fenceline, a location at the nearest downwind residence or receptor, a location
downwind of the seep area, and  a location downwind of the test pit excavation. During
the sampling event without excavation activity, a randomly chosen position on the landfill
was substituted as the sample location downwind of the test pit.

Sampling for PCBs, pesticides, and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) was done
over a 2-day period after the  first VOC ambient air sampling event  had been completed.
Polyurethane foam (PUF) was used as the collection medium per EPA Reference Method
TO-10.  Four locations were sampled each day.  The compounds that were analyzed for
are listed in Table 2.  PUF samples were collected from locations upwind of the landfill,
downwind of the aeration lagoon, downwind  of the seep area, and downwind of a borehole
on the landfill.

The field team selected sample locations just prior  to sampling on the basis of wind
direction.  Ambient air sample collection started during mid-morning to allow the wind
direction to stabilize.  Once sampling started, sample locations remained fixed throughout
each sampling period, even though wind direction may have changed.

The landfill gas investigation was completed  by sampling the 10 gas  probes installed at the
site and 2 Michigan Department of Natural Resources  (MDNR) gas probes during
4 sampling events.  Samples were collected in tedlar bags  and analyzed for methane using
EPA Method 51 IB and selected  VOCs using EPA  Method 8240. The compounds
analyzed for from the soil gas collected in tedlar bags are listed  in Table 3.   The first two
sampling events occurred during  the  second round of groundwater sampling. The third
event occurred a week later during the surveying and mapping field activity, and the fourth
event occurred during the third round of groundwater sampling.

-------
                                        Table 1
                                 G&H LANDFILL SITE
                DETECTION LIMITS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
            COLLECTED ON TENAX AND CARBON MOLECULAR SIEVE TUBES
                              Detection
Carbon Molecular Sieve         Limit
Volatile Organic Compounds     (ng/tube)

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          50
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane              50
1,1,2-Trichloroethane              50
1,1 -Dichloroethane                50
1,1 -Dichloroethene                50
1,2-Dichloroethane                50
1,2-Dichloroethene                50
Acetone                          50
Benzene                          50
Carbon disulfide                   50
Carbon tetrachloride               50
Chlorobenzene                    50
Chloroform                       50
Chloromethane                    50
Ethylbenzene                     50
Methylene chloride                 50
Styrene                           50
Tetrachloroethene                 50
Toluene                          50
Trichloroethene                    50
Vinyl chloride                     50
Xylene (total)                     50
                              Detection
Tenax                         Limit
Volatile Organic Compounds     (ng/tube)

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          25
1,1,1-Trichloroethane              25
1,1,2-Trichloroethane              25
1,1-Dichloroethane                25
1,1 -Dichloroethene                25
1,2-Dichloroethane                25
1,2-Dichloroethene                25
1,2-Dichloropropane               25
2-Butanone                      50
2-Chloroethylvinylether            50
2-Hexanone                      50
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone            50
Acetone                          50
Benzene                         25
Bromodichloromethane            25
Bromoform                       25
Bromomethane                    50
Carbon disulfide                   25
Carbon tetrachloride               25
Chlorobenzene                    25
Chloroethane                     50
Chloroform                       25
Chloromethane                    50
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene           25
Dibromochloromethane            25
Ethylbenzene                     25
Methylene chloride                 25  .
Styrene                          25
Tetrachloroethene                 25
Toluene                          25
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene          25
Trichloroethene                    25
Vinyl acetate                      25
Vinyl chloride                     50
Xylene (total)                      25

-------
                                       Table 2
                                 G&H LANDFILL SITE
      DETECTION LIMITS FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS AND PESTICDES/PCBS
                       FOR POLYURETHANE FOAM SAMPLES
Semivolatile Organics
Phenol
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
4-Methylphenol
n-N itro-di-n-propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophrone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzole Acid
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachloropentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl phthalate
3-Nitroaniline
Detection
Limit
(ug/PUF)

    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    50
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    50
    10
    50
    10
    50
Semivolatile Organics
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
di-n-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1,2,3-CD)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Detection
Limit
(ug/PUF)

    10
    50
    50
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    50
    50
    10
    10
    10
    50
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    20
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
    10
Pesticides/PC Bs
Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
Delta-BHC
Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Heptachlor epbxide
Endosulfan I
Dieldrin
4,4-DDE
Endrin
Endosulfan II
4,4-DDD
Endrin Aldehyde
Detection
Limit
(ug/PUF)
  0.01
  0.01
  0.01
  0.01
  0.01
  0.01
  0.01
  0.01
  0.02
  0.02
  0.02
  0.02
  0.02
  0.02
Pesticides/PC Bs
Endosulfan sulfate
4,4-DDT
Methoxychlor
Endrin Ketone
Chlorodane
Toxaphene
Aroclor-1016
Aroclor-1221
Aroclor-1232
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Detection
Limit
(ug/PUF)
  0.02
  0.02
  0.10
  0.02
  0.10
  0.20
  0.10
  0.10
  0.10
  0.10
  0.10
  0.20
  0.20

-------
                                     Table 3
                               G&H LANDFILL SITE
              DETECTION LIMITS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                GAS PROBE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN TEDLAR BAGS
Volatile Organic
Compounds
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Detection
Limits
(ug/l)

  10
  10
  10
  10
   5
 100
   5
   5
   5
   5
   5
   5
 100
   5
   5
  50
   5
   5
Volatile Organic
Compounds
1,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
Total Xylenes
Detection
Limits
(ug/l)

   5
   5
   5
   5
   5
   5
   5
  10
   5
  50
  50
   5
   5
   5
   5
   5
   5

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 3
January 22, 1990
GL065561.FI
PERSONNEL

CH2M HILL personnel and their responsibilities during the landfill gas and ambient air
sampling phase of the investigation were:

       Team Member                   Responsibility

      Jeff Keiser              Assistant Project Manager
      Bryan Laude             Sample Team Member/Documentation
      Cathy Kantowski         Sample Team Member/Documentation
      Anne Stumpf            Sample Team Member/Site Safety Officer


                             FIELD  ACTIVITIES

The first ambient air sampling event for VOCs was conducted during test pit excavation
from May 22 to 25.  PUF samples were collected on May  31 and June 1 to determine
PCB, pesticide, and SVOC concentrations.  The second sampling event was conducted
from August 7 to 11, when no activities were being performed onsite that would add to
the release of contaminants into the air. Landfill gas samples were collected from each of
the 12 gas probes on August 8, 10, and 22 and October 18.  The landfill gas and ambient
air sampling activities are summarized in Table 4.

Samples were submitted to laboratories in the U.S. EPA Contract  Laboratory Program
(CLP)  for Special Analytical Services (SAS).  The SAS parameters consisted of the VOCs
listed in the U.S. EPA Reference Methods TO-1 and TO-2 for the ambient air sampling.
PUF samples were collected and analyzed for PCBs, pesticides and SVOCs according to
EPA Reference Method TO-10. Tedlar bag samples collected from the gas probes were
analyzed for methane by EPA Method 51 IB and selected VOCs by EPA Method 8240. A
more detailed description of the analyses performed for the ambient air and gas probe
samples can be found in the SAS requests in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP),
approved October 21, 1988.  Detailed sampling procedures, equipment descriptions, and
responsibilities are also  discussed in the QAPP. All sampling was  conducted as described
in the QAPP except for necessary field modifications described below.

AMBIENT AIR VOC SAMPLING

Tenax  and  carbon molecular sieve  tubes were used in parallel to sample for VOCs.  Front
and back tubes of each type were used on each sample to prevent contaminant
breakthrough.  Five locations were sampled each day. The field crew selected sample

-------
                             Table 4
                        G&H LANDFILL SITE
    LANDFILL GAS  AND AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE COLLECTION ACTIVITITES
                                             Sample  Collection
Sample Type              Sample Date         Time  Interval	


Ambient Air (VOCs)       May 22, 1989        10:59 to  12:28
                         May 22, 1989        15:59 to  17:38
                         May 23, 1989        14:09 to  15:54
                         May 24, 1989        09:33 to  11:38
                         May 25, 1989        12:22 to  14:23
Ambient Air (PUF)        May 31, 1989        14:07 to  18:29
                         June 1, 1989        10:00 to  14:03
Ambient Air (VOCs)       August 7, 1989      13:40 to  17:43
                         August 8, 1989      12:37 to  16:50
                         August 9, 1989      10:45 to  15:07
                         August 10, 1989     11:10 to  15:25
                         August 11, 1989     10:03 to  14:25
Landfill Gas             August 8, 1989      09:12 to  16:25
(Gasprobes)              August 10, 1989     07:40 to
                         August 22, 1989     08:55 to  14:18
                         October 18, 1989

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 4
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI


locations just prior to sampling on the basis of wind direction. Samples  were collected
50 feet downwind of the test pit on the basis of previous HNu levels measured while
excavating prior test pits.  At this distance HNu levels were measured between zero and
10 ppm above background.  Higher concentrations could have caused breakthrough to the
back tube, thus causing the sample to be suspect.  This 50-foot distance  was used
throughout the sampling event.

Each sample was identified using a sample code that consisted of the following parts: the
site code (GH); the sample type (AA for ambient air); the sample collection media type
(C for carbon molecular sieve, T for tenax tube); the location code, which  indicates one of
the five locations from which the sample was collected and whether it was  the front or
back tube in the set; and a number code from 01 to  10 that identifies the  day the sample
was collected.  The location codes used for the ambient air VOC sampling are:

            UWF      Upwind Front Tube
            UWB      Upwind Back Tube

            TPF        Test Pit Front Tube
            TPB        Test Pit Back Tube

            SAF        Seep Area Front Tube
            SAB        Seep Area Back Tube

            DFF        Downwind Fenceline Front Tube
            DFB        Downwind Fenceline Back Tube

            DRF       Downwind Residence Front Tube
            DRB       Downwind Residence Back Tube

            FBF        Field Blank Front Tube
            TBF        Trip Blank Front Tube

A field replicate was represented by an FR preceding the location code. An example of a
complete sample code is:

            GH-AA-C-FRTPF-02

This sample code represents  an ambient air field replicate  sample from  the G&H Landfill
site, collected on the front tube of a carbon molecular sieve,  50 feet downwind of the test
pit—the second sample collected on May 22.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 5
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI


The sampling locations and meteorological conditions for each sample collected are shown
in Figures 1 to 10. The field crew attempted to select sample locations according to the
guidance provided in the QAPP.  Because the wind was north-northeasterly during
sampling on May 23, several sample locations varied from the locations specified in the
QAPP.  The downwind residence sample was collected at a location 100 feet downwind  of
the test pit because there are no residences southwest of the site close enough from which
to collect a sample. The downwind fenceline sample was collected from the southwest
corner of the Phase 2 and 3 landfill instead of at the fenceline because of the steep drop
in elevation that occurs where the edge of the landfill slopes to the Clinton River.   This
location for the downwind fenceline sample was selected so the change  of elevation and
the vegetation on the  slope would not affect the ambient air concentrations by dispersing
the contaminants.

Selection of sample locations for the ambient air VOC sample collected on May 24 were
based on a southwest  wind that was present at the start of sampling.  The  wind shifted to
the south-southeast for most of the sampling period.  Therefore, sample locations are not
consistent with the predominant wind direction for this sample.

The downwind residence sample  collected  on August 7 was located at the trailer area.
This location was selected because there were no  nearby residences downwind of wind
from the northwest.  Results from this sample location may be used to  assess  contaminant
levels at the trailer area.

Samples with number codes of 01 to 05 were collected during the first ambient air
sampling event; samples with number codes of 06 to  10 were collected during the second
ambient air sampling event. The second sampling event was conducted during a period of
no site activity.

Ambient VOC samples from the first sampling event were collected during the excavation
or backfilling of individual test pits. This operation was usually completed  within
90 minutes, so sample flow rates were set  at approximately 200 to 220 cc/minute to
achieve the proper sample  volume of approximately 20 liters of air. The number codes
assigned to each sample date and their associated test pits are as follows:

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8
Page 6
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI
                                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
            Sampling Date

            May 22
            May 22
            May 23
            May 24
            May 25

            August 6
            August 7
            August 8
            August 9
            August 10
            Number Code

                  01
                  02
                  03
                  04
                  05

                  06
                  07
                  08
                  09
                  10
Test Pit No.

   TP-20
   TP-21
   TP-25
   TP-26
   TP-33
Each set of tenax and carbon molecular sieve tubes flow rates were calibrated before
sampling and the flow rates were measured after sampling. An average of these two flow
rates was used in the following equation to calculate the sample volume passed through
each individual set of traps.

      Average Flow Rate x Sample Time  =  Sample Volume

During the second ambient air sampling event,  samples  were  collected over a 4-hour
period at flow rates of approximately 100 cc/minute, which gave a sample volume of
24 liters. The sample time was increased to  4 hours to  sample over a greater range of
site  conditions during the course of the day.  The increased volume of air sampled also
provided lower detection limits.

All ambient air samples were collected approximately 5  feet above the ground to limit  the
effects of ground cover vegetation on contaminant levels and  to collect samples
representative of concentrations that occur in the breathing zone.

Results from the laboratory were reported as nanograms per  trap.  These results were
converted to  micrograms of contaminant per  cubic meter of air sampled using the formula:
       Conc(ng) / Vol(1) x (1,000 liters/m3) x (yg/1,000 ng) = Conc(iag/m3)
where:
       Cone,
           (ng)
       Cone,
           (Jlg/m3)
=  concentration reported by the laboratory as ng/trap
=  volume of air sampled on each individual trap in liters
=  concentration in micrograms per cubic meter

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 7
January 22, 1990
GL065561.FI
For each VOC ambient air sampling event, a field replicate was collected daily at a
different sample  location on both the carbon molecular sieve (CMS) and the tenax tubes.
A field blank was prepared each day by opening the end caps on  a CMS and a tenax tube
and recapping them without drawing any air through the traps.  A trip blank consisting of
an unopened CMS and a tenax tube was also sent for analysis each day.

Three sets of replicate tubes were collected for each media type to be used by the
laboratory for a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) analysis; however, the
laboratory analyzing the tenax tubes for the first sampling event did not use the designated
sets of tubes for the MS/MSD  analysis.  Although the  chain-of-custody and SAS packing
lists designated the proper tubes to be  used for MS/MSD analysis, miscommunication
between the laboratory and the CH2M HILL sample control custodian caused this
mistake.  The three sets of tenax tubes collected for the MS/MSD analysis are, therefore,
considered field replicate samples.

After sample collection was complete, the  tubes were  returned to  the sample preparation
area where,  after the final flow rate check, end caps were replaced and tightened.  Each
tube was tagged, put in a plastic bag, placed in a tin can containing absorbent charcoal,
and shipped in iced coolers. Sample custody was maintained by the CH2M HILL project
team until samples were shipped the same evening to  the designated  CLP laboratory.
Custody seals  placed on the coolers by the project team confirmed that the chain of
custody remained intact until the laboratory received the samples.  Sample numbers, types,
dates of collection and shipment, and laboratory destinations are listed in Table 5.

METEOROLOGICAL DATA

A Climetronics system meteorological station was set up onsite to  record wind speed, wind
direction, and temperature data during the sampling events.  For the  first event,  a strip
chart record was available and averages for wind speed and wind  direction were
determined.   Because the temperature  sensor did not  function properly, no  temperature
record is available.  For the second sampling event, the meteorological system was installed
with a magnetic  tape and data logger system to record meteorological information. The
meteorological data could not be retrieved from the cassette tape  after the  sampling event
was concluded.  Because of the poor meteorological data recovery, National Weather
Service (NWS) data from the Detroit Metropolitan Airport were obtained and substituted
for the onsite data.  Meteorological conditions presented in Figures 1 through 12 are
averages of  the NWS data for  each sampling period.   For consistency, the NWS
meteorological data will be used in future  correlations with  the contaminant concentrations
measured during the ambient air sampling events.  Hourly averages for the  NWS
meteorological data and the onsite meteorological data that were  retrieved are presented
and summarized in Table 6.

-------
30-Jan-90
(Page 1  of 4)
                                                     TABLE 5
                                                G&H  LANDFILL  SITE
                                           SAMPLE  IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                        TENAX AND  CMS AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING

Sample Nunber
GH-AA-C-UWF-01
GH-AA-C-UUB-01
GH-AA-C-TPF-01
GH-AA-C-TPB-01
GH-AA-C-SAF-01
GH-AA-C-SAB-01
GH-AA-C-DFF-01
GH-AA-C-DFB-01
GH-AA-C-FRDFF-01
GH-AA-C-FRDFB-01
GH-AA-C-DRF-01
GH-AA-C-ORB-01
...
...
GH-AA-C-FBF-01
GH-AA-C-TBF-01
GH-AA-C-UUF-02
GH-AA-C-UWB-02
GH-AA-C-TPF-02
GH-AA-C-TPB-02
GH-AA-C-FRTPF-02
GH-AA-C-FRTPB-02
GH-AA-C-SAF-02
GH-AA-C-SAB-02
GH-AA-C-DFF-02
GH-AA-C-DFB-02
GH-AA-C-DRF-02
GH-AA-C-DRB-02
GH-AA-C-FBF-02
GH-AA-C-TBF-02
GH-AA-C-UWF-03
GH-AA-C-UWB-03
...
...
GH-AA-C-TPF-03
GH-AA-C-TPB-03
GH-AA-C-SAF-03
GH-AA-C-SAB-03
GH-AA-C-FRSAF-03
GH-AA-C-FRSAB-03
GH-AA-C-DFF-03
GH-AA-C-DFB-03
GH-AA-C-DRF-03
GH-AA-C-DRB-03
GH-AA-C-FBF-03
GH-AA-C-TBF-03
SAS No.
/ JLT^C
465ZC
(TO-2)
E15
616
E17
E18
E19
E20
£21
E22
E23
E24
E25
E26
...
...
E27
E28
E43
E44
E45
E46
E47
E48
E49
E50
E51
E52
E53
E54
£55
E56
E57
ESS
...
...
E59
E60
E61
E62
E63
E64
E65
E66
E67
E68
E69
E70

Laboratory
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
...
...
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
...
...
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO

Sample Nunber
GH-AA-T-UWF-01
GH-AA-T-UUB-01
GH-AA-T-TPF-01
GH-AA-T-TPB-01
GH-AA-T-SAF-01
GH-AA-T-SAB-01
GH-AA-T-DFF-01
GH-AA-T-DFB-01
GH-AA-T-FRDFF-01
GH-AA-T-FRDFB-01
GH-AA-T-DRF-01
GH-AA-T-DRB-01
GH-AA-T-FRDRF-01
GH-AA-T-FRDRB-01
GH-AA-T-FBF-01
GH-AA-T-TBF-01
GH-AA-T-UWF-02
GH-AA-T-UUB-02
GH-AA-T-TPF-02
GH-AA-T-TPB-02
GH-AA-T-FRTPF-02
GH-AA-T-FRTPB-02
GH-AA-T-SAF-02
GH-AA-T-SAB-02
GH-AA-T-DFF-02
GH-AA-T-DFB-02
GH-AA-T-DRF-02
GH-AA-T-DRB-02
GH-AA-T-FBF-02
GH-AA-T-TBF-02
GH-AA-T-UWF-03
GH-AA-T-UUB-03
GH-AA-T-FRUWF-03
GH-AA-T-FRUWB-03
GH-AA-T-TPF-03
GH-AA-T-TPB-03
GH-AA-T-SAF-03
GH-AA-T-SAB-03
GH-AA-T-FRSAF-03
GH-AA-T-FRSAB-03
GH-AA-T-DFF-03
GH-AA-T-DFB-03
GH-AA-T-DRF-03
GH-AA-T-DRB-03
GH-AA-T-FBF-03
GH-AA-T-TBF-03
SAS No
AAT9C
*
-------
30-Jan-90
                                                                                                  (Page 2 of 4)
                                                TABLE 5 (Cont)
                                               G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                          SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                       TENAX AND CMS AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING

Sample Number
GH-AA-C-UUF-04
GH-AA-C-UUB-04
GH-AA-C-FRUWF-04
GH-AA-C-FRUUB-04
GH-AA-C-TPF-04
GH-AA-C-TPB-04
GH-AA-C-SAF-04
GH-AA-C-SAB-04
GH-AA-C-DFF-04
GH-AA-C-DFB-04
GH-AA-C-DRF-04
GH-AA-C-DRB-04
GH-AA-C-FBF-04
GH-AA-C-TBF-04
GH-AA-C-UWF-05
GH-AA-C-UWB-05
GH-AA-C-TPF-05
GH-AA-C-TPB-05
GH-AA-C-SAF-05
GH-AA-C-SAB-05
GH-AA-C-DFF-05
GH-AA-C-DFB-05
...
...
GH-AA-C-DRF-05
GH-AA-C-DRB-05
GH-AA-C-FRDRF-05
GH-AA-C-FRDRB-05
GH-AA-C-FBF-05
GH-AA-C-TBF-05
SAS No.
AAT9C
HO3CC
(TO-2)
E99
E100
E101
E102
E103
E104
E105
E106
E107
E108
E109
E110
E111
E112
E127
E128
E129
£130
E131
E132
E133
E134
...
...
E135
E136
E137
E138
E139
EUO

Laboratory
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
...
...
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO

Sample Nunber
GH-AA-T-UWF-04
GH-AA-T-UUB-04
GH-AA-T-FRUUF-04
GH-AA-T-FRUW8-04
GH-AA-T-TPF-04
GH-AA-T-TP3-04
GH-AA-T-SAF-04
GH-AA-T-SAB-04
GH-AA-T-DFF-04
GH-AA-T-DFB-04
GH-AA-T-DRF-04
GH-AA-T-DRB-04
GH-AA-T-FBF-04
GH-AA-T-TBF-04
GH-AA-T-UUF-05
GH-AA-T-UWB-05
GH-AA-T-TPF-OS
GH-AA-T-TPB-05
GH-AA-T-SAF-05
GH-AA-T-SAB-05
GH-AA-T-DFF-05
GH-AA-T-DFB-05
GH-AA-T-FRDFF-05
GH-AA-T-FRDFB-05
GH-AA-T-DRF-05
GH-AA-T-DRB-05
GH-AA-T-FRDRF-05
GH-AA-T-FRDRB-05
GH-AA-T-FBF-05
GH-AA-T-TBF-05
SAS No,
fJLfyc
HOO£C
(TO-1)
ESS
E86
E87
ESS
E89
£90
E91
E92
E93
E94
E95
E96
E97
E98
E113
E114
E115
E116
E117
E118
E119A
E120A
E1198
E120B
E121
E122
E123
E124
E125
E126

Laboratory
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PE!
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
Collection
Date
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89

Time
0940
0940
0940
0940
1004
1004
0933
0933
1005
1005
0950
0950
1000
1000
1252
1252
1240
1240
1248
1248
1237
1237
1237
1237
1222
1222
1222
1222
1300
1300

Sh ipment
Date
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-24-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89
05-25-89

-------
30-Jan-90
                                                                                                    (Page 3 of 4}
                                                TABLE  5  (Cent)
                                               G&H  LANDFILL  SITE
                                         SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION  MATRIX
                                      TENAX AND CMS AMBIENT  AIR SAMPLING

Sample Number
GH-AA-C-UUF-06
GH-AA-C-UUB-06
GH-AA-C-SAF-06
GH-AA-C-SAB-06
GH-AA-C-FRSAF-06
GH-AA-C-FRSAB-06
GH-AA-C-TPF-06
GH-AA-C-TPB-06
GH-AA-C-DFF-06
GH-AA-C-DFB-06
GH-AA-C-DRF-06
GH-AA-C-DRB-06
GH-AA-C-FBF-06
GH-AA-C-TBF-06
GH-AA-C-UWF-07
GH-AA-C-UWB-07
GH-AA-C-SAF-07
GH-AA-C-SAB-07
GH-AA-C-TPF-07
GH-AA-C-TPB-07
GH-AA-C-DFF-07
GH-AA-C-DFB-07
GH-AA-C-FRDFF-07
GH-AA-C-FRDFB-07
GH-AA-C-DRF-07
GH-AA-C-DRB-07
GH-AA-C-FBF-07
GH-AA-C-TBF-07
GH-AA-C-UWF-08
GH-AA-C-UWB-08
GH-AA-C-SAF-08
GGH-AA-C-SAB-08
GH-AA-C-TPF-08
GH-AA-C-TPB-08
GH-AA-C-FRTPF-08
GH-AA-C-FRTPB-08
GH-AA-C-DFF-08
GH-AA-C-DFB-08
GH-AA-C-DRF-08
GH-AA-C-DRB-08
GH-AA-C-FBF-08
GH-A-C-TBF-08
SAS No.
/Q1 
-------
30-Jan-90
                                                                                                   (Page 4 of A)
                                               TABLE 5 (Cent)
                                              G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                        SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                     TENAX AND CMS AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING

Sample Number
GH-AA-C-UWF-09
GH-AA-C-UWB-09
GH-AA-C-SAF-09
GH-AA-C-SAB-09
GH-AA-C-TPF-09
GH-AA-C-TPB-09
GH-AA-C-DFF-09
GH-AA-C-DFB-09
GH-AA-C-DRF-09
GH-AA-C-DRB-09
GH-AA-C-FRDRF-09
GH-AA-C-FRDRB-09
GH-AA-C-FBF-09
GH-AA-C-TBF-09
GH-AA-C-UWF-10
GH-AA-C-UUB-10
GH-AA-C-FRUWF-10
GH-AA-C-FRUWB-10
GH-AA-C-SAF-10
GH-AA-C-SAB-10
GH-AA-C-TPF-10
GH-AA-C-TPB-10
GH-AA-C-DFF-10
GH-AA-C-DFB-10
GH-AA-C-ORF-10
GH-AA-C-DRB-10
GH-AA-C-FBF-10
GH-AA-C-TBF-10
SAS No.
Afl1 1C
HO 1 1C
(TO-2)
E99
E100
E101
E102
£103
E104
E105
E106
E107
E108
E109
E110
E111
E112
E127
£128
E129
E130
E131
E132
E133
E134
E135
E136
E137
E138
E139
EUO

Laboratory
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO

Sample Number
GH-AA-T-UUF-09
GH-AA-T-UVB-09
GH-AA-T-SAF-09
GH-AA-T-SAB-09
GH-AA-T-TPF-09
GH-AA-T-TPB-09
GH-AA-T-DFF-09
GH-AA-T-DFB-09
GH-AA-T-DRF-09
GH-AA-T-DRB-09
GH-AA-T-FRDRF-09
GH-AA-T-FRDRB-09
GH-AA-T-FBF-09
GH-AA-T-TBF-09
GH-AA-T-UWF-10
GH-AA-T-UUB-10
GH-AA-T-FRUUF-10
GH-AA-T-FRUUB-10
GH-AA-T-SAF-10
GH-AA-T-SAB-10
GH-AA-T-TPF-10
GH-AA-T-TPB-10
GH-AA-T-DFF-10
GH-AA-T-DFB-10
GH-AA-T-DRF-10
GH-AA-T-DRB-10
GH-AA-T-FBF-10
GH-AA-T-TBF-10
SAS No,
£A11P
HO IIC
(TO-1)
£85
£86
E87
£88
E89
£90
£91
E92
E93
£94
£95
£96
£97
£98
£113
£114
£115
E116
£117
£118
E119
E120
£121
E122
E123
E124
E125
£126

Laboratory
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
ESECO
Collection
Date
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89

Time
1110
1110
1129
1129
1114
1114
1123
1123
1137
1137
1137
1137
1300
1300
1003
1003
1003
1003
1024
1024
1010
1010
1017
1017
1028
1028
1201
1201

Sh i pment
Date
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
08-11-89
ESECO - Environmental Science and Engineering/Hunter Environmental Services, Inc., CO
PEI - PEI Associates, Inc., OH
— = no sample collected

-------
GL065561.FI.FA Amb VOCS 1  1-24-90
                                                                         RESIDENTIAL AREA
                                                                                                                      LEGEND
                                                           *??*^^^^
                                                                                                                              Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                                              U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                                              Gate

                                                                                                                              Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                                              river

                                                                                                                              Trail

                                                                                                                              Railroad grade
                                                                                                                              (Tracks removed)

                                                                                                                              VOC Sampling Location

                                                                                                                              Test Pit Location
                                                                                                                  NOTE: Locations are approximate.
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
 Predominant
Wind Direction:
 VARIABLE
                                                                                                                  Sample Date: MAY 22,1989
                                                                                                                  Sample Time Interval: 10:59 to 12:28

                                                                                                                  Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                                  Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                    Average Wind Speed: 9mph
                                                                                                                    Average Temperature: 74' F
                                                                                                                    Predominant Wind Direction: Variable

                                                                                                                  Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                    UW= Upwind
                                                                                                                    TP= Test Pit
                                                                                                                    SA = Seep Area
                                                                                                                    DF = Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                    DR = Downwind Residence
                                                                                                                  FR preceding the location code designates
                                                                                                                  that a field replicate sample was collected
                                                                                                                  at that location.
                                                                                                                       FIGURE 1
                                                                                                                       AMBIENT AIR VOCS
                                                                                                                       SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                                                                       G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                                                       TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
          GLO65561.FI.FA Amb VOCS 2 1-24-90
                                                                                 RESIDENTIAL ARE A
                                                                                                                               LEGEND
                                                                                                     \
                                                                                                     UUTOMOBILE
                                                                                                  IV   DISPOSAL
                                    ?~"*"vsx           ;7x  xx
                                    '    PHA"SE II LANDFILL  X.   /**.
       Landfill Boundary

       U.S. EPA Site Fence

       Gate

       Ditch, stream, or
       river

       Trail

       Railroad grade
       (Tracks removed)

       VOC Sampling Location

       Test Pit Location
                                                                                                                          NOTE: Locations are approximate.
             500
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
                                   Predominant
                                  Wind Direction:
                                      ESE
                                                                                                                          Sample Date: MAY 22,1989
                                                                                                                          Sample Time Interval: 15:59 to 17:38

                                                                                                                          Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                                          Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                            Average Wind Speed: 11 mph
                                                                                                                            Average Temperature: 71' F
                                                                                                                            Predominant Wind Direction:  ESE

                                                                                                                          Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                            UW= Upwind
                                                                                                                            TP= Test Pit
                                                                                                                            SA = Seep Area
                                                                                                                            DF= Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                            DR = Downwind Residence
                                                                                                                          FR preceding the location code
                                                                                                                          designates that a field replicate sample
                                                                                                                          was collected at that location.
FIGURE 2
AMBIENT AIR VOCS
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
          GL065561.FI.FA Amb VOCS 3  1-25-90
                                                                                RESIDENTIAL AREA
                                                                                                                              LEGEND
           \  \   PHASE III
           x-   '.  LANDFILL
                                                                                                                                     Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                                                     U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                                                     Gate
.^   ,—.,  Ditch, stream, or
           river
                                                                                                                                     Trail

                                                                                                                                     Railroad grade
                                                                                                                                  i   (Tracks removed)

                                                                                                                                     VOC Sampling Location

                                                                                                                                     Test Pit Location
                                                                                                                          NOTE: Locations are approximate.
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
 Predominant
Wind Direction:
    NNE
                                                                                                                         Sample Date: MAY 23, 1989
                                                                                                                         Sample Time Interval: 14:09 to 15:54

                                                                                                                         Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                                         Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                           Average Wind Speed: 12 mph
                                                                                                                           Average Temperature: 66' F
                                                                                                                           Predominant Wind Direction: NNE

                                                                                                                         Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                           UW=  Upwind
                                                                                                                           TP=  Test Pit
                                                                                                                           SA =  Seep Area
                                                                                                                     ^     DF=  Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                    ^"""^   DR = • Downwind Residence
                                                                                                                         FR preceding the location code
                                                                                                                   /*"£$; designates that a field replicate sample
                                                                                                                         was collected at that location.
    FIGURE 3
    AMBIENT AIR VOCs
    SAMPLING LOCATIONS
    G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
    TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
     GLO65561 .FI.FA Amb VOCS 4 1-25-90
       /,'
        500
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET

                                                               C^MERCIAL
                A\\H  JW*'^V^a^^^?. >^\
                  Vx>K^      V-^-""              ~&Y^
                  v.,¥ V-^~-::=..AT-" r=^53rs?s^«.	jul  i«
                   )«///       v~: ^  **'y»&i/^wytf?^^
                         ,             .
                         H^SE II LANDFILL X«..Vx.
                "~v..
                                 >
\
                     Predominant
                    Wind Direction:
                      SSE
                                                            Landfill Boundary

                                                            U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                            Gate

                                                            Ditch, stream, or
                                                            river

                                                            Trail

                                                            Railroad grade
                                                            (Tracks removed)

                                                            VOC Sampling Location

                                                            Test Pit Location
                                                                           NOTE: Locations are approximate.
                                                     Sample Date: MAY 24,1989
                                                     Sample Time Interval: 09:33 to 11:38

                                                     Meteorological Conditions During
                                                     Sampling from NWS Data
                                                      Average Wind Speed: 10 mph
                                                      Average Temperature: 67' F
                                                      Predominant Wind Direction: SSE

                                                     Sample Location Codes
                                                      UW= Upwind
                                                      TP= Test Pit
                                                      SA= Seep Area
                                                      DF = Downwind Fenceline
                                                      DR = Downwind Residence
                                                     FR preceding the location code
                                                     designates that a field replicate sample
                                                     was collected at that location.
FIGURE 4
AMBIENT AIR VOCS
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
GL065561.FI.FA Amb VOCS 5 1-25-90
                                                               RESIDENTIAL AREA

                                                                    23-MILE ROAD
                                                                                              FRDROS
                                                                                           Q PROS
    //'
                          x \ V v ^ >=::	      *T-"'" T-S:^3i ss*
                           V/f     '~ ^^-^'A  ,/      I,.  v~* '—
                •„.-- —..     5*;V          ^**».  ^~-/{~.~.      ••^^^••i
                   "-^4w,.... ^^>^.;:s-^c^
   /»
   t >
   i»
   I!
  • >.
  • \
  i \
  t \
   -^.^.
                          *
                               •
-------
           GLO65561 .FI.FA Amb VOCS 6 1-22-90
                                               UW06
                                                                                                                              LEGEND
                                                                                RESIDENTIAL AREA

                                                                                     23-MILE ROAD
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
 Predominant
Wind Direction:
    NW
                                                                                                                                     Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                                                     U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                                                     Gate

                                                                                                                                     Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                                                     river

                                                                                                                                     Trail

                                                                                                                                     Railroad grade
                                                                                                                                     (Tracks removed)

                                                                                                                                     VOC Sampling Location
                                                                                                                         NOTE: Locations are approximate.
                                                                                                                         Sample Date: AUGUST 7,1989
                                                                                                                         Sample Time Interval: 13:40 to 17:43

                                                                                                                         Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                                         Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                          Average Wind Speed: 14 mph
                                                                                                                          Average Temperature: 65* F
                                                                                                                          Predominant Wind Direction: NW

                                                                                                                         Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                          UW= Upwind
                                                                                                                           TP= Test Pit
                                                                                                                           SA = Seep Area
                                                                                                                           DF = Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                           DR = Downwind Residence
                                                                                                                   ^u$» FR preceding the location code
                                                                                                                   ^~»fcj  designates that a field replicate  sample
                                                                                                                         was collected at that location.
FIGURE 6
AMBIENT AIR VOCs
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
          GLO65561.FI.FA Amb VOCS 7 1-22-90
                                                                                                                             LEGEND
                                                                                RESIDENTIAL AREA

                                                                                    23-MILE ROAD
                                                                                                                                    Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                                                    U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                                                    Gate

                                                                                                                                    Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                                                    river

                                                                                                                                    Trail

                                                                                                                                    Railroad grade
                                                                                                                                    (Tracks removed)

                                                                                                                                    VOC Sampling Location
                                                                                                                         NOTE: Locations are approximate.
                                                                                                                         Sample Date: AUGUST 8, 1989
                                                                                                                         Sample Time Interval: 12:37 to 16:50

                                                                                                                         Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                                         Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                          Average Wind Speed: 8 mph
                                                                                                                          Average Temperature: 71 ' F
                                                                                                                          Predominant Wind Direction: WEST
                                                                                              TP
                                                                                              SA=
                                                                                              DP =
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
 Predominant
Wind Direction:
   WEST
                                                                                                                         Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                           UW= Upwind
                                                                                                                                Test Pit
                                                                                                                                Seep Area
                                                                                                                                Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                           DR - Downwind Residence
                                                                                                                         FR preceding the location code
                                                                                                                         designates that a field replicate sample
                                                                                                                         was collected at that location.
FIGURE 7
AMBIENT AIR VOCs
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
GL065561.FI.FA Amb VOCS 8  1-25-90


                                A^UWOS
                               VV (at gate)
                                         | I          RESiDENTiALAREA

                                        J 1   	    23-MILE ROAD      jQ	___
                                    m****,M*S  TW«»	-J-«-LU^---JUI	 TIn^nnnft^nnnrvnr-ri^^r^-UUUUL	nnnfl—HI
                                    ffl^gCT««»ffiyi^OTri4.
                                                           ;V   ^"^^CvX.SAOB
                                                   • •••••*••(..• • •i • •^ffiS&sCxJ^ _ *«^
                                                       ^- / sssss^spwi*vk^*^pv
                                                      ^j|A™^^
                                                                                                                   LEGEND
                                                                                                         Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                         U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                         Gate

                                                                                                         Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                         river

                                                                                                         Trail

                                                                                                         Railroad grade
                                                                                                         (Tracks removed)

                                                                                                         VOC Sampling Location
                                                                                                               NOTE: Locations are approximate.
   f
Predominant
   Wind
 Direction:
   SSW
                                                                                                              Sample Date: AUGUST 9,1989
                                                                                                              Sample Time Interval: 10:45 to 15:07

                                                                                                              Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                              Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                Average Wind Speed: 10 mph
                                                                                                                Average Temperature: 79' F
                                                                                                                Predominant Wind Direction: SSW

                                                                                                              Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                UW= Upwind
                                                                                                                TP= Test Pit
                                                                                                                SA = Seep Area
                                                                                                                DF = Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                DR = Downwind Residence
                                                                                                              FR preceding the location code
                                                                                                              designates that a field replicate  sample
                                                                                                              was collected at that location.
                                                                                                                   FIGURE 8
                                                                                                                   AMBIENT AIR VOCs
                                                                                                                   SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                                                                   G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                                                   TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
          GL065561 .FI.FA Amb VOCS 9  1 -25-90
                              UW09
                              (at gate)
                                                                                                         FRDR09
                                                                                                                             LEGEND
                                                                                                                                    Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                                                    U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                                                    Gate

                                                                                                                                    Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                                                    river

                                                                                                                                    Trail

                                                                                                                                    Railroad grade
                                                                                                                                    ( Tracks removed )

                                                                                                                                    VOC Sampling Location
                                                                                                                         NOTE: Locations are approximate.
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
Predominant
   Wind
 Direction:
    W
                                                                                                                        Sample Date: AUGUST 10,1989
                                                                                                                        Sample Time Interval: 11:10 to 15:25

                                                                                                                        Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                                        Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                          Average Wind Speed: 10 mph
                                                                                                                          Average Temperature: 79' F
                                                                                                                          Predominant Wind Direction: W

                                                                                                                        Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                          UW= Upwind
                                                                                                                          TP= Test Pit
                                                                                                                          SA = Seep Area
                                                                                                                          DF = Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                          DR = Downwind Residence
                                                                                                                        FR preceding the location code
                                                                                                                        designates that a field replicate sample
                                                                                                                        was collected at that location.
FIGURE 9
AMBIENT AIR VOCs
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
GLO65561 .FI.FA Amb VOCS 10 2-6-90
                                                                        RESIDENTIAL ARE A

                                                                             23-MILE ROAD
                                          I  — ~w?&*"*Z.^~'''*~**'^
                                         J \    3 ^^fgSy^^^^my^fff«y^^:i"i"i''Ji'>Jv^

                                                                                                                               LEGEND


                                                                                                                                      Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                                                      U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                                                      Gate

                                                                                                                                      Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                                                      river

                                                                                                                                      Trail

                                                                                                                                      Railroad grade
                                                                                                                                   >   (Tracks removed)

                                                                                                                               O     VOC Sampling Location

                                                                                                                           NOTE: Locations are approximate.
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
      Predominant
         Wind
NNE   Direction
                                                                                                                  Sample Date: AUGUST 11, 1989
                                                                                                                  Sample Time Interval: 10:03 to 14:25

                                                                                                                  Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                                                  Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                                                   Average Wind Speed: 6 mph
                                                                                                                   Average Temperature: 77' F
                                                                                                                   Predominant Wind Direction: Variable

                                                                                                                  Sample Location Codes
                                                                                                                   UW=  Upwind
                                                                                                                   TP=  Test Pit
                                                                                                                   SA =  Seep Area
                                                                                                                   DF =  Downwind Fenceline
                                                                                                                   DR =  Downwind Residence
                                                                                                                  FR preceding the location code
                                                                                                                  designates that a field replicate sample
                                                                                                                  was collected at that location.
                                                                                                                      FIGURE 10
                                                                                                                      AMBIENT AIR VOCs
                                                                                                                      SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                                                                      G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                                                      TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
GLO65561.FI.FA Polyur Foam 1 1-25-90
                                                                RESIDENTIAL AREA
                                                                                                           LEGEND
1^:	v'l
 V'  '               •_•! A
                                                          g^^
                                                                                   UUTOMOBILE
                                                                                     DISPOSAL
                                                                                       YARD
                                                                                   "
                                                                  ,   .».        -..            0
               \ \  //' •-"^7.-,-.^
               ^  \ A-;  *„ "-<::
                  '      •~-
-------
        GLO65561.FI.FA Polyur Foam 2  1-25-90
                                                            RESIDENTIAL AREA
                                                rK7^;™''^""""-^
   t..
\--^5^^^  if
  X               ^^^fe^-^Ci
                                                     ^^^-Z"^
                                                        *K  •• * -""V"- .s.
                                                    •M14- ^O- ^- •**•- ~*£-.S.~,.£

                                                       22-MILE ROAD-
                          \\
          500
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
Predominant
  Wind
 Direction:
  SSW
                                                                                              LEGEND


                                                                                                   Landfill Boundary

                                                                                                   U.S. EPA Site Fence

                                                                                                   Gate

                                                                                                   Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                   river

                                                                                                   Trail

                                                                                                   Railroad grade
                                                                                                 • (  (Tracks removed)

                                                                                                   PUF Sampling Location

                                                                                                   Monitoring Well Location

                                                                                           NOTE: Locations are approximate.
                                                                                           Sample Date: JUNE 1,1989
                                                                                           Sample Time Interval: 10:00 to 14:03

                                                                                           Meteorological Conditions During
                                                                                           Sampling From NWS Data
                                                                                            Average Wind Speed: 14 mph
                                                                                            Average Temperature: 72' F
                                                                                            Predominant Wind Direction: SSW

                                                                                           Sample Location Codes
                                                                                            UW= Upwind
                                                                                            SA= Seep Area
                                                                                            AL = Aeration Lagoon
                                                                                            BH = Borehole
                                                                                            FRAL = Field Replicate
                                                                                                 Aeration Lagoon
                                               FIGURE 12
                                               AMBIENT AIR
                                               POLYURETHANE FOAM
                                               SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                               G&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                               TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
                                                                       Page 1 of 3
                                     Table 6
                                G&H LANDFILL SITE
               COMPARISON OF NWS AND ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL DATA
                 COLLECTED DURING AMBIENT AIR MONITORING EVENTS
National Weather Service Data (NWS)


Date Time
May 22, 1989 08:50
09:53
10:50
11:51
12:54
13:51
14:50
15:50
16:51
17:50
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
200
60
170
220
130
120
140
120
120
120
Wind
Speed
(mph)
6
7
8
10
9
12
13
12
12
8

Temperature
(degrees R
66
71
73
75
75
76
74
73
71
70
Onsite Data
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
Variable
150
160
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
90
50
Wind
Speed
(mp
3
3
3
4
4
5
7
5
6
9
m










May 23,1989
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:50
16:51
40
30
360
20
10
10
12
10
12
10
13
12
62
63
64
66
68
69
360
20
40
360
340
30
5
6
7
5
6
8
May 24,1989
07:50
08:50
09:51
10:50
11:51
12:50
200
200
150
160
150
140
10
12
9
12
9
12
60
63
66
71
76
75
160
170
160
150
160
150
3
6
5
6
6
8
May 25, 1989
10:52
11:50
12:51
13:50
14:51
15:53
230
250
230
230
260
240
16
18
17
18
17
10
70
74
76
79
80
81
180
190
220
210
210
220
7
7
8
8
7
7

-------
                     Table 6
                G&H LANDFILL SITE
COMPARISON OF NWS AND ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL DATA
  COLLECTED DURING AMBIENT AIR MONITORING EVENTS
                                                      Page 2 of 3
National Weather Service Data (NWS)


Date
May 31, 1989








June 1, 1989








August 7, 1989







Augusts, 1989










Time
12:51
13:51
14:51
15:53
16:50
17:32
17:50
18:12
18:50
08:50
09:52
10:50
11:27
11:52
12:50
13:50
14:09
14:52
11:50
12:50
13:52
14:50
15:50
16:50
17:50
18:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:51
16:51
17:51
18:51
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
140
240
240
220
240
230
230
230
230
180
180
210
180
210
250
270
260
280
300
290
310
300
300
310
320
320
320
340
340
290
290
330
240
240
190
Wind
Speed
(mph)
8
17
17
20
17
16
17
17
20
10
13
14
14
17
16
10
12
10
15
17
16
13
14
14
16
17
8
12
12
7
7
8
9
12
9

Temperature
(degrees R
77
80
81
82
82
	
80
	
78
70
72
71
	
71
72
74
	
76
63
65
66
65
64
62
64
61
64
66
68
70
71
72
71
70
68
Onsite Data
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
140
170
180
180
200
	
200
	
190
30
130
160
	
180
180
210
	
230
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Wind
Speed
(mph)
5
5
6
7
8
— —
5
—
4
4
4
5
—
5
8
6
—
7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

-------
                                    Table 6
                               G&H LANDFILL SITE
               COMPARISON OF NWS AND ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL DATA
                 COLLECTED DURING AMBIENT AIR MONITORING EVENTS
                                                                      Page 3 of 3


Date Time
Augusts, 1989 08:50
09:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:51
16:50
August 10, 1989 09:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:50
15:53
16:52
August 11, 1989 08:50
09:50
10:50
11:50
12:50
13:50
14:04
14:50
15:35
15:51
16:50
Wind
Direction
(degrees)
200
180
190
200
240
230
180
200
230
240
270
180
280
270
280
290
130
360
290
190
10
60
30
30
190
210
240
280
Wind
Speed
(mph)
8
7
8
9
14
15
14
13
14
9
9
12
12
9
9
9
8
4
4
4
6
7
12
7
12
7
7
7
                                                74
                                                76
                                                78
                                                79
                                                80
                                                79
                                                81
                                                81
                                                73
                                                76
                                                79
                                                82
                                                79
                                                76

                                                70

                                                75
                                                77
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA = Data Not Available

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 8
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI
POLYURETHANE FOAM SAMPLING

Samples were collected using U.S. EPA Reference Method TO-10, which consists of
drawing air through a polyurethane foam plug with a personal sampling pump.  The four
locations sampled each day were upwind of the  landfill, downwind of the seep area,
downwind  of the aeration lagoon, and downwind of a borehole.  Samples were identified
using a sample code consisting of the site code (GH); the sample type (AA for  ambient
air); the sample collection medium (P for PUF sample); the location code, which indicates
from which of the four locations the sample was collected; and a number code that
identifies the date the  sample was collected.  PUF samples with the number code 01 were
collected on May 31, and samples with the number code 02 were collected on June 1.
The location codes used for PUF sampling are:

                  UW        Upwind
                  SA         Seep Area
                  AL        Aeration Lagoon
                  BH        Borehole

A field replicate was represented by an FR preceding the location code.  The sampling
locations and  the meteorological conditions that existed during sample collection are shown
in Figures 11  and 12.

This phase of the sampling program was delayed because the laboratory mistakenly sent
high volume PUF sample cartridges instead of the low volume cartridges specified in the
SAS request.  The laboratory purchased the correct low volume cartridges, certified them
clean, and shipped them to the site as soon as the error was discovered.  Samples were
collected downwind of boreholes instead of test  pits because the test pit operation had
been completed by the time the proper cartridges were received from the CLP  laboratory.

The first day's borehole sample was collected  downwind of RW24, whereas the  second
day's borehole sample was collected downwind of RD24.  The PUF ambient air samples
were collected approximately 5 feet above ground to limit the effects of ground cover
vegetation on contaminant levels and to  collect a sample representative of concentrations
that occur in the breathing zone.

Eight PUF samples were collected during the 2-day sampling event.  In addition, one field
blank and one field replicate were sent to the contract  laboratory for QA/QC analysis.
The field blank  was prepared by unwrapping the cartridge from the aluminum foil,
exposing it to the ambient air, and rewrapping it for shipment to the CLP laboratory.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                       AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 9
January 22, 1990
GLO65561.FI


Following sample  collection, the PUF samples were returned to the sample preparation
area where the cartridges were wrapped in aluminum foil, placed in tin cans with
absorbent charcoal packing, and put in coolers for shipment.  Sample custody was
maintained by the CH2M HILL project team until samples were shipped the same evening
to the designated  CLP laboratory.  Custody seals placed on the coolers by the
CH2M HILL project team confirmed that the chain of custody was intact until the
laboratory received the samples.  The sample numbers, types, dates of sample collection
and shipment, and laboratory destinations are listed in Table 7.

GAS PROBE SAMPLING

Gas probe samples were collected in tedlar bags from the two MDNR gas probes (GP04
and GP05) and 10 gas probes installed at the site. Two tedlar bags were collected from
each gas probe.  One was used for methane analysis, and the other was used for the
analysis of selected VOCs.  Samples were described by using a sample code consisting of
the following parts:  the site code (GH); the sample type (LG for landfill gas); the analysis
type (M for methane or V for  VOC analysis); the location code (GP01 to GP13)
identifying the gas probe from  which the sample was collected; and a number code (01 to
04), identifying the date the sample was collected.  A field replicate was represented by an
FR preceding the location code.

Gas probe samples were collected during four sampling events.  The number codes
represent the sample events that occurred on the following days:

               Sampling Date            Number Code

                 August 8                    01
                 August 10                   02
                 August 22                   03
                 October 18                  04
The laboratory did not analyze samples collected during the first sampling event on
August 8.  When the samples arrived, the laboratory's instrumentation was not set up for
the analysis of the samples, so the holding time of 24 hours was violated. The samples
were discarded without being analyzed and sampling was performed on August  10 to
replace the samples lost from the first sampling event.  The location of each gas probe
sampled  at the landfill site is shown in Figure 13.

Gas probes were purged by  placing teflon tubing into the probe through a rubber stopper
that sealed the probe  at the cap.  A  personal sampling pump was allowed to pump for
10 minutes to purge 5 to 6 volumes of landfill gas from the gas probe before sample

-------
                                 TABLE 7
                             G&H LANDFILL SITE
                        SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                         PDF AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING


Sample Number
GH-AA-P-UW-01
GH-AA-P-SA-01
GH-AA-P-AL-01
GH-AA-P-BH-01
GH-AA-P-FB-01
GH-AA-P-UW-02
GH-AA-P-SA-02
GH-AA-P-AL-02
GH-AA-P-FRAL-02
GH-AA-P-BH-02
SAS No.
4633E
(TO-10)
E01
E02
EOS
E04
EOS
E06
E07
EOS
EOS
E10



Collection
Laboratory
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
Date
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
Time
1417
1409
1407
1424
1400
1016
1011
1007
1007
1000

Shipment
Date
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
05-31-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
06-01-89
S3 - S-Cubed, CA

-------
GLO65561.FI  GAS PROBE 8.5x11  12-04-89
  }jX/V<  w
 //   ;   i'-CO-V
•'/\   /^      *:^
  t  /'           ;*,•
 ••''  :   .*            • :f
 / /   \  •            '. :
/•   \ \   PHASE III   :/i
.- /     \  *.  LANDFILL   t.\
I       \  \          K
               •^:
Ul    \\
 ' \ Q      *  '
 \l*       \  S
 \\%    \ i
   \x*^   \:-
   N- \    *v •
     ^\    \
       J\   9>	••
      //   /yV  5
      /    .' .*   \ V
                     Fl
                     {/
                    .41
                                                   ] 1        RESIDENTIAL AREA
                                                   I I GP05        GP04          AGP03
                                           rj'J2?K«i»7K3«a«w5OT^
                                           i:                  GP02  jl       I GP°7,~_->^
                                                                   .1       • / 4 . /?   "•»* ~.
                                                                   =/       ;• kiC
                                                                   ii        r. rv.      x
                                                                                                   23-MILE ROAD
 "****«\**;»%       \       PHASE I LANDFILL
       ""vW
  ,,,.       -N:/^.,
  /   N;^         4  ••. v«.
  '     -*x       9    *«.   /s,
         •x    /     x. >-,
                                                                                      1  n  Q
                                                                                       >! COMMERCIAL
                                                                                       I/,   AREA
                                                                                          GP10
                                         OIL	4i
                                         SEEPAGE
                                         AREA
                            *v\   {'" 'Si*^
                           . ^. \  }  ^^
                           ^VHU      v.
                                                                ^^^~^  <^»"  '••
                                                                     v"	c-KV^'N
                                                                           .A>- ;  ^  "x/
                                                                                                           LEGEND
                                                                                                                 Landfill Boundary
                                                                                                                 U.S. EPA Site Fence
                                                                                                                 Gate
                                                                                                                 Ditch, stream, or
                                                                                                                 river
                                                                                                                 Trail
                                                                                                                 Railroad grade
                                                                                                                 (Tracks removed)
                                                                                                                 Gas Probe
                                                                                                                 Sampling Location
                                                                                          NOTES: Locations are approximate.
                                                                                               GP04 & GP05 are Michigan DNR
                                                                                               gas probes.
        APPROXIMATE
        SCALE IN FEET
                                                                                            FIGURE 13
                                                                                            GAS PROBE
                                                                                            SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                                            G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                                                            TECH. MEMO. NO. 8

-------
      TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
      Page 10
      January 22, 1990
      GLO65561.FI


      collection began. Gas probe sample collection was attempted by evacuating the rigid wall
      container, thereby filling an  enclosed tedlar bag with gas.  Sample gas would not flow into
      the tedlar bag because a complete seal could not be obtained on the rigid wall container
      and the sample  pump could not overcome the leaks in the system. An alternative
      sampling method was used whereby the sample gas was pumped directly into the  tedlar
      bag through the personal sampling pump.  Samples were collected using this method for
      all four sampling events for  consistency.

      An HNu photoionization detector equipped with a 10.2-eV lamp was used to screen the
      gas probes before purging and sampling took place, and no readings above background
      were determined.  The day before the first sampling event a magnehelic gauge was placed
      on all gas probes. No differences in pressures were noted, so the gauge was not  used
      during subsequent sampling  events.

      Tedlar bags  were flushed with ultrapure nitrogen before sample  collection took place.
      Two blanks were prepared for each sampling event by filling tedlar bags directly with
      ultrapure nitrogen. During each gas probe sampling event, two  gas probes were selected
      from which a second  set of  samples was collected.  One set of samples was used  as a  field
      replicate, the other for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis.

i      When  sample collection was complete, the samples were tagged and placed in coolers
1      protected from light to avoid photochemical reactions.  Sample custody was maintained by
      the CH2M  HILL project team until samples were shipped to the designated CLP
      laboratory.   Custody seals placed on the coolers by the project team confirmed that the
      chain of custody was  intact until the laboratory received the samples.  Table 8 documents
      the sample  numbers,  types, sample collection times, dates of shipment, and laboratory
      destinations.


                                   SAMPLE  RESULTS

      Data summaries from the landfill gas and  ambient air sampling  are presented in Technical
      Memorandum No. 10.
      sk/GLT863/075.50

-------
05-Jan-90
                                                                                                      (Page 1 of 2)
                                                   TABLE 8
                                              G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                         SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                              GAS PROBE SAMPLING

Sample Number
GH-LG-M-GP08-01
GH-LG-M-GP12-01
GH-LG-M-FRGP12-01
GH-LG-M-GP11-01
GH-LG-M-GP11-01
GH-LG-M-GP07-01
GH-LG-M-GP05-01
GH-LG-M-GP02-01
GH-LG-M-GP06-01
GH-LG-M-GP01-01
GH-LG-M-GP03-01
GH-LG-M-GP10-01
GH-LG-M-GP04-01
GH-LG-M-GP09-01
GH-LG-M-FB01-01
GH-LG-M-TB01-01
SAS No.
(511B)
E141
E142
E143
E144
E144
E145
E153
E154
E163
E164
E165
E166
E167
E168
E169
E170

Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN

Sample Number
GH-LG-V-GP08-01
GH-LG-V-GP12-01
GH-LG-V-FRGP12-01
GH-LG-V-GP11-01
GH-LG-V-GP11-01
GH-LG-V-GP07-01
GH-LG-V-GP05-01
GH-LG-V-GP02-01
GH-LG-V-GP06-01
GH-LG-V-GP01-01
GH-LG-V-GP03-01
GH-LG-V-GP10-01
GH-LG-V-GP04-01
GH-LG-V-GP09-01
GH-LG-V-FB01-01
GH-LG-V-TB01-01
SAS No.
AR1 1P
HO IIC
(8240)
E146
EU7
E148
E149
E149
E150
E151
E152
E155
E156
E157
E158
E159
E160
E161
E162

Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Collection
Date
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
i
Time
0912
0930
0930
0945
0945
1002
1622
1534
1439
1448
1414
1523
1606
1506
1708
1710

Sh ipment
Date
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89
08-08-89

Sample Number
GH-LG-M-GP01-02
GH-LG-M-GP02-02
GH-LG-M-GP03-02
GH-LG-M-GP04-02
GH-LG-M-GP05-02
GH-LG-M-GP06-02
GH-LG-M-GP07-02
GH-LG-M-GP08-02
GH-LG-M-FRGP08-02
GH-LG-M-GP09-02
GH-LG-M-GP10-02
GH-LG-M-GP11-02
GH-LG-M-GP12-02
GH-LG-M-FB02-02
GH-LG-M-TB02-02
SAS No.
/IM 1C
HO I 1C
(511B)
E171
E172
E173
E174
E175
E176
E177
E178
E179
E180
E181
E182
E183
E184
E185

Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN

Sample Number
GH-LG-V-GP01-02
GH-LG-V-GP02-02
GH-LG-V-GP03-02
GH-LG-V-GP04-02
GH-LG-V-GP05-02
GH-LG-V-GP06-02
GH-LG-V-GP07-02
GH-LG-V-GP08-02
GH-LG-V-FRGP08-02
GH-LG-V-GP09-02
GH-LG-V-GP10-02
GH-LG-V-GP11-02
GH-LG-V-GP12^02
GH-LG-V-FB02-02
GH-LG-V-TB02-02
SAS No.
/Q1 1C
HO I 1C
(8240)
E186
E187
E188
E189
E190
E191
E192
E200
E193
E194
E195
E196
E197
E198
E199

Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Collection
Date
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
i
Time
1015
0744
0910
0910
0950
1008
0850
0819
0819
1150
1210
0836
0804
1500
1500

Shipment
Date
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
08-10-89
RADIAN - Radian Corporation, CA

-------
05-Jan-90
                                                                                                      (Page 2 of 2)
                                                  TABLE 8
                                             G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                        SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                             GAS PROBE SAMPLING


Sample Number
GH-LG-M-GP01-03
GH-LG-M-GP02-03
GH-LG-M-GP03-03
GH-LG-M-GP04-03
GH-LG-M-GP05-03
GH-LG-M-GP06-03
GH-LG-M-GP07-03
GH-LG-M-GP08-03
GH-LG-M-FRGP08-03
GH-LG-M-GP09-03
GH-LG-M-GP10-03
GH-LG-M-GP11-03
GH-LG-M-GP12-03
GH-LG-M-FB03-03
GH-LG-M-TB03-03



Sample Number
GH-LG-M-TB01-04
GH-LG-M-FB01-04
GH-LG-M-GP01-04
GH-LG-M-GP02-04
GH-LG-M-GP03-04
GH-LG-M-GP04-04
GH-LG-M-GP05-04
GH-LG-M-GP06-04
GH-LG-M-GP07-04
GH-LG-M-FRGP07-04
GH-LG-M-GP08-04
GH-LG-M-GP09-04
GH-LG-M-GP10-04
GH-LG-M-GP11-04
GH-LG-M-GP12-04
SAS No.
AA11P
to 1 ic
(511B)
E201
£202
E203
E204
E205
E206
E207
E208
£209
E210
E211
E212
E213
E214
E215
SAS No.
AOA7C
HTO/C
(511B)
£06
E07
EOS
£09
£10
£11
£12
£13
E14
E15
E16
E17
E18
E19
£20


Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN



Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN


Sample Number
GH-LG-V-GP01-03
GH-LG-V-GP02-03
GH-LG-V-GP03-03
GH-LG-V-GP04-03
GH-LG-V-GP05-03
GH-LG-V-GP06-03
GH-LC-V-GP07-03
GH-LG-V-GP08-03
GH-LG-V-FRGP08-03
GH-LG-V-GP09-03
GH-LG-V-GP10-03
GH-LG-V-GP11-03
GH-LG-V-GP12-03
GH-LG-V-FB03-03
GH-LG-V-TB03-03



Sample Number
GH-LG-V-TB01-04
GH-LG-V-FB01-04
GH-LG-V-GP01-04
GH-LG-V-GP02-04
GH-LG-V-GP03-04
GH-LG-V-GP04-04
GH-LG-V-GP05-04
GH-LG-V-GP06-04
GH-LG-V-GP07-04
GH-LG-V-FRGP07-04
GH-LG-V-GP08-04
GH-LG-V-GP09-04
GH-LG-V-GP10-04
GH-LG-V-GP11-04
GH-LG-V-GP12-04
SAS No.
AR1 1C
HO I 1C
(8240)
E216
£217
£218
£219
E220
E221
£222
£223
£224
E225
E226
£227
£228
£229
E230
SAS No.
/ OfiTC
*»yof c
(8240)
E21
£22
£23
E24
E25
E26
£27
£28
E29
E30
£31
£32
£33
£34
E35


Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN



Laboratory
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
RADIAN
Collection

Date
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
Collection


Date
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89


Time
1335
0905
1225
1255
1310
1325
1005
1020
1020
1355
1415
0950
0925
1300
1300



Time
1100
1100
1536
1344
1506
1600
1610
1525
1306
1306
1223
1454
1422
1246
1327

Shipment
Date
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89
08-22-89

-
Sn i pment
Date
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
RADIAN - Radian Corporation,  CA

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
TO:         Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM:     Isaac Johnson/GLO

PREPARED
BY:         Cathy Kantowski/GLO

DATE:      January 3, 1990

SUBJECT:  Round 3 Groundwater Sampling
            G&H Landfill Phase III RI

PROJECT:  GLO65561.FI.FQ
                                 INTRODUCTION

From October 16 through 19,  1989, groundwater and landfill gas samples were collected as
part of the Round 3 sampling effort of the Phase III remedial investigation (RI) at the
G&H Landfill site. This technical memorandum summarizes groundwater monitoring well
sampling field activities.  Water level measurements  were also  taken concurrently with
monitoring well sampling.
                                   OBJECTIVES

The general objectives of the Phase III field activities were to collect additional data for
evaluating public health risks from site contaminants and to develop and evaluate remedial
action alternatives for the site.  Specific objectives were to:

     •    Collect data to support and complete a quantitative risk assessment

     •    Estimate more accurately the size and characteristics of the contaminant source
          areas and to help select and evaluate remedial alternatives that will contain,
          reduce, remove, or destroy contaminant sources

     •    Improve  the understanding of site hydrogeology to evaluate potential
          contaminant pathways

     •    Evaluate and select remedial alternatives for groundwater treatment by analysis
          of SAS conventional parameters

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
Page 2
January 3, 1990
GLO65561.FI.FQ
                    AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                                   APPROACH

To meet the foregoing objectives, 63 monitoring wells were sampled.  Samples were
obtained from 47 new monitoring wells installed as part of the Round 2, Phase III RI.
The  16 existing monitoring wells that were sampled were chosen to compare with previous
analytical results, to provide additional information for the risk assessment, and to achieve
the objectives for groundwater analysis listed previously.  Specific data quality objectives
were detailed in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP).
                                   PERSONNEL

CH2M HILL personnel and their responsibilities during the investigation were:

     Team Member                 Responsibility
     Isaac Johnson
     Bryan Laude
     Anne Stumpf

     Cathy Kantowski
     Hugh Allerton
     Jeff Glenny
     James Adams
Project Manager
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member,
  Site Safety Coordinator
Sample Team Member/Documentation
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Sample Team Member
Glen Turchan from Connestoga-Rovers & Associates was onsite representing the PRPs
and observing groundwater sampling techniques.
                                FIELD ACTIVITIES

Groundwater samples were collected from October 16 to 19.  Samples were submitted to
laboratories in the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) for Routine Analytical
Services (RAS) and Special Analytical Services (SAS) parameters.  RAS parameters
consisted of target compound list inorganic analytes, volatile and semivolatile organic
compounds, pesticides, and PCBs.  The SAS conventional parameters requested were oil
and grease, BOD, COD, TOC, total phosphate, TDS, alkalinity, chloride, ammonia, nitrate
plus nitrite, and sulfate.

Detailed sampling procedures, equipment descriptions, and  responsibilities are discussed in
the QAPP, approved October 21, 1988, and approved Revision  4 to the QAPP, March 3,

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
Page 3
January 3, 1990
GLO65561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
1989. Revisions 1, 2, and 3 were incorporated in the original QAPP. All sampling was
conducted as described in the QAPP, except for the necessary field modifications described
herein.

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING

Groundwater samples were collected from 16 existing monitoring wells and 47 recently
installed wells at the site  between July 24 and 28.  Sampling locations are shown in
Figure 1.

Seven replicates, six field blanks, and five trip blanks were collected as QA/QC checks.
The trip blanks were made using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) water
in the field trailer and shipped to the laboratory with the samples for volatile organic
compound analysis.  The  field blanks were prepared by pouring HPLC water into
decontaminated bailers for organic  compounds and metals or commercial deionized water
into decontaminated bailers for  conventional parameters and transferring it to appropriate
sample containers.  All blanks were preserved and handled as if they were actual samples.
The field blank samples for metals were also filtered.

Static water levels were measured before purging and before samples were collected using
an  electronic water  level  indicator (Table 1).  The volume of standing water was calculated
from the water level measurement  and the well depth.  Monitoring wells that were
adequately recharging were purged of at least five well  volumes before sampling.  Wells
that did not recharge sufficiently were bailed dry, allowed to recharge, and then sampled
on  the same day. All wells were purged using stainless steel bailers.  Purge volumes were
measured by emptying  the bailer into a 5-gallon bucket and counting the number of
buckets filled. Purge water was disposed of onsite approximately 20 feet from well head
location.

One recently installed well, GH38A, was found to have a visible oil layer, so it was not
sampled.  Wells GH16A  AND GH21A could not be sampled because the well casings
were bent. Wells GH04A, GH15A, RL09, RL21, RL22, and RW20 were dry so no
samples were obtained.

Wells were sampled immediately after purging using the same bailer as used for purging
the well.   The nylon cord suspending each bailer was discarded after each well.  A VOA
vial was filled as the first sample from each full bailer.  A sample for field parameters was
collected in a separate  bottle and returned to the sample preparation area immediately
after sampling for testing. The  results of field parameter testing are presented in Table  2.

-------
Page 1 of 3
                                   TABLE  1
                           Croundwater Elevations
                         C&H  LANDFILL PHASE  III Rl
                         Technical Memorandum  No.  9
wel 1
Number
CH01B
CH01C
CH02A
CH02B
CH02C
CH03A
CH03B
CH03C
CH04A
CH04B
CH04C
CH05A
CH06A
CH06B
CH07A
CH08A
CH08B
CH08C
CH09A
CH09B
CH1 18
CH12A
CH12B
CH13B
CH14A
CH14B
CH14C
CH15A
CH15B
CH15C
CH16A
CH16B
CH16C
GH17B
CH17C
CH18B
CH19A
CH19B
CH20A
CH20B
Date
Recorded
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
Top of casing
Elevation (a)
(ft ms I )
688
690

688
688
685
687
687
689
688
691
700
695
695
684
683
684
683
688
687
696
694

697

704
704
707
707
707
710
708
709
704
703
707
696
697
690
689
.60
.20
(0
.34
.20
.69
.93
.22
.00
.61
.00
.21
.42
.40
.42
.24
.40
.60
.15
.61
.20
.09
(C)
.24
(C)
.45
.50
.31
.33
.66
.07
.44
.28
.41
.98
. 11
.03
.59
.02
.89
Depth to
water below
top of cas i ng
(ft)
6
20
4
5
19
4
6
5

14
22
17
10
10
10
13
13
14
9
8
10
8
8
8
8
8
30

14
48
.83
.20
.11 *
.76
.05
.41
.32
.92
dry
.22
.23
.37
.01
.04
.35
.57
.30
.12
.17
.61
.03
.27
.40 *
.30
.11
.37
.44
dry
.81
.94
Water
(b) Elevat
(ft ms
681.
670.
-
682.
669.
681.
681 .
681 .
-
674.
668.
682.
685.
685.
674.
669.
671.
669.
678.
679.
686.
685.
-
688.
-
696.
674.
-
692.
658.
I eve I
ion
I)
77
00
--
58
15
28
61
30
--
39
77
84
41
36
07
67
10
48
98
00
17
82
--
94
--
08
06
--
52
72
casing bent —
13
31
12
16
11
7
9
7
7
.28
.90
.72
.02
. 12
.54
. 10
.32
.23
695.
677.
691 .
687.
695.
688.
688.
682.
682.
16
38
69
96
99
49
49
70
66

-------
Page 2 of 3
                                  TABLE 1
                           Croundwater Elevations
                         C&H LANDFILL PHASE III  Rl
                         Technical  Memorandum No. 9
we 1 1
Number
CH21A
CH22A
CH22B
CH23A
CH24A
CH25A
CH26A
CH27A
CH28A
CH28B
CH29A
CH29B
CH29C
CH30A
CH30B
CH31A
CH31B
CH31C
CH32A
CH33A
CH33B
CH34A
CH34B
CH35A
CH35B
CH36A
CH36B
CH37A
CH38A
CH39A
CH40A
CH40B
CH41B
CH42B
CH43A
CH43B
CH44A
CH45A
I 03
I 05
Date
Recorded
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
Top Of
Elevat
(ft ms
688.
692.
692.
668.
688.
687.
690.
704.
701.
701.
694.
693.
695.
697.
697.
696.
697.
697.
691.
688.
688.
688.
687.
697.
697.
695.
696.
695.
700.
686.
687.
687.
688.
689.
691.
692.
691.
693.
693.
697.
cas ing
ion (a)
I)
94
04
72
94
22
17
79 *
89
48
87
83
96
47
28
18
98
70
35
81
93
79
11
75
71
63
56
17
06
55
73
41
47
33
64
19
32
69
43
53 *
26 *
Depth
water
top of
(ft)
4.
4.
36,
13.
4.
5.
7.
11 .
10.
10.
9.
8.
10.
10.
9.
9.
10.
13.
7.
4.
4.
6.
5.
11.
11.
5.
6.
5.
12.
3.
4.
4.
4.
14.
11 .
12.
11.
14.
4.
10.
to
below
cas ing
36
21
83
87
34
06
68 *
61
36
78
44
08
02
04
95
98
72
67
72
94
57
90
84
94
76
68
27
54
73
46
27
32
00
77
73
65
92
25
50 •
70 '
Water
(b) Elevat
(ft ms
684.
687.
655.
655.
683.
682.
683.
693.
691 .
691 .
685.
685.
685.
687.
687.
687.
686.
683.
684.
683.
684.
681 .
681 .
685.
685.
689.
689.
689.
687.
683.
683.
683.
684.
674.
679.
679.
679.
679.
689.
686.
I eve I
ion
I)
58
83
89
07
88
11
11
28
12
09
39
88
45
24
23
00
98
68
09
99
22
21
91
77
87
88
90
52
82
27
14
15
33
87
46
67
77
18
03
56

-------
Page 3 of 3
                                  TABLE 1
                           Croundwater Elevations
                         C&H LANDFILL PHASE I I I  Rl
                         Technical Memorandum No. 9
we 1 1
Number
RD02X
RD08XX
RD18
RD24
RL04
RL06
RL09
RL10
RL17
RL21
RL22
RL23
RL29
RW05
RW07
RW10
RW12X
RW14
RW19
RW20
RW21
RW22
RW23
RW24
RW30
Date
Recorded
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
Top Of
Elevat
(ft ms
708.
708.
711.
708.
708.
709.
708.
709.
709.
710.
709.
707 .
710.
710.
709.
709.
706.
706.
711.
710.
710.
709.
707.
709.
712.
casing
Ion (a)
I)
30
08 •
07
04
31
90
00
93
27
42
42
10
18
45
06
80
06
69
70
78
69
49
65
24
65
Depth
water
top o
(ft)
14
18
20
17
16
18

16
21


14
28
21
18
14
18
20
20

20
19
18
18
20
to
below
f casing
.84
.59 *
.00
.22
.02
.44
dry
.22
.42
dry
dry
.43
.10
.08
.35
.59
.56
.64
.13
dry
.16
.87
.17
.34
.84
Water
(b) Elevat
(ft ms
693.
689.
691.
690.
692.
691.
-
693.
687.
-
-
692.
682.
689.
690.
695.
687.
686.
691 .
-
690.
689.
689.
690.
691 .
level
ion
I)
46
49
07
82
29
46
—
71
85
--
--
67
08
37
71
21
50
05
57
--
53
62
48
90
81
(a) Top of casing measurements  refer  to  inner casing (riser) without PVC
    coupling, MSL is  referenced to a  USCS datum.
(b) Assumed  top of casing measurements refer to inner casing (riser) without
    PVC coup Ii ng
(c) NO top of casing  elevation  available.
 *  Measurements from the top of outer (protective) casing
— Not appli cable

-------
\: ;;l -H Vs X,^ ®GH15B,C | | RESSOe^TJALAHEA
x/,. WO * ^ ""Vr^--Jr 2s^
\ \ ''••:•-. : '.• -•: ••: •: •:• •:• •:• •:• ;• .• .-. .-. .-. .-. -. •. -.- -.- ~~" * ~ ~ it - „ ~ - X - — X " *" 	 X 	 x
l -. •:-. 	 -•• •• •• • v v *.-- — x — x 	 *
Ax. \\ "\*
"-•,:• \,,v '. V- '•-
-.. •• / ^ •••-,. \' •. i 't - V
'''::. ,+ \ '"'•-: ,+ 	 * V - £v . : :
'I jf ••' '''C\ " .#'-'' Ok \ •••!-. :•:•:''•"'• . QniQ
^^ :' '• •• +f*. -. ^P '•..' ' •-•'. "'..'••, -^ r\U I O % : -•
. // • ""^ GH^2^-? " \ ""'• ". _ RL06 ARL04 J;
•:. '/ L 	 ^'"**<<\ ^,! ;>-\, \\ * ii
:- v ' '•" :•; '•• 'f $ :• <• ' ' •:• ... .. ..-• '•• •:•'.;. *• •' ":. * • :
;;•: ' ;j; :: . '*'• \\. '' '•: .;. ': : :.:
' j.*" « •: .- '' ""••-. ' **>
v ?r : !l ^,. \ ?^. - ;:
\ t. i !: S *r%. *X'*%, ^ A PHASE i LANDFILL
V 'V, - '? - "*^ 'V /^,..GH37A ^ p*
\ \ PHASE HI ^,= j -^ f^^^ \x gSg
\ « LANDFILL f ;j - '^j. x-. ;'::>,... ^ 9 RW21
\ 1 i\ -; : k y^., 'f x,"';:':-:- .=:
* •:•: « '••• : •:•: "*>. '\. v:- . ••:'
\ \ RL29 Gft304,B« "y%^ '•—C'&v.
\ \ * ®? > I ''::<'*:>., '":-- ?**... RW22
\ '^ 3 '• ? '*^.f. * V. '"*,:.. fl. ®
* =;x « / .::: ..•'.•:.-.•.•-. '?*#,. ""••-.. "'::.5:... « w RW10
\ •;• •*';*•'/' ""•<::. .'/ "-:;^, ;'•,, •v-::<.:.. RD8XX
\ S .^ ;:;:•' •->,... .0' ':%. "X..",;.,.
\ ••> .-• -••>:• -• >:• '•••: . .- '•'.-:-. ' :- '••'.-:.
* •:- .-• -.- -.- • .;-.. .:.- *:. . t .. •:-> , 	
H ^ ^V V s '"^, / "^^ '''••<::%,.
\ ?. xi S; "-:: -.. ,.•" ' '':>x * ,. 'x?.:. .
^;,. \ \ 0|: | ^ PHASE II LAMOFILL "**¥. '^^vN*. x,""
HUE ROAD
X X 	 X 	 X — X ~x~ \
I/ '- 	 • " s "'••••' H i
» •- . ® :GH27A « i! 1
Si\ '". i ! \ H
i ^ = AUTO^OBiLE 1
...f.;k.. YARO jl
! i? «' HI
:;: ; i /, ||
g GH2.8:A!B. ..-V ff
• .' i . •
1 // i\ 1
RW23 \ K I I g
\ GH36A.B I 0 £K
"'•!• ' :• Z :
::: A 	 | 1 yi; i; u;
::: GH19B .,.,,.,™^Xi; i S
x •" i "^5 :• C<5
« • i H U;
; ^ I 	 j \ ce
GH14A ^

North
t
0 300
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
ii ::«:*«:::;:::*:::*:::::::¥:::::: LANDFILL BOUNDARY
x 	 x 	 x 	 x U.S. EPA SITE FENCE
^ GATE
DITCH, STREAM, OR
••'"••.•• 	 	 RIVER
                                                                                          ,...••:..-;, 'GHOIAiB
                                                                               GH34A.B.x~...,l.	';:-.-.'.

,"<'"'": • •'••
.•••
.-•




'•- ': ; "'.:
'"•'-.r 	 •••••-.. ..-;^'::
•-• 	 --^ ";',..,// .••-.,...

/' " "•"•• •":.."••- ...
/ ' 	 -"-_".'.'•.•••••
"•-*-,.
~~^'* 	
•• . .
•• •.'.'"- -
GH45A


•"'sf"



\.
                                                                                                                                           TRAIL

                                                                                                                                           RAILROAD GRADE
                                                                                                                                           (TRACKS REMOVED)

                                                                                                                                           MONITORING WELL
                                                                                                                                           SAMPLING LOCATION
                   \
FIGURE 1
MONITORING WELL
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
G & H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
TECH. MEMO. NO. 9

-------
page 1  of  2
                                                                Table 2
                                                   Monitoring wells Field Parameters
                                                       C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                       Technical Memorandum NO. 9
we I I
Number
CHOI A
CH01B
CH02A
CH03B
CH03C
CH04B
CH08B
CH09A
CH09B
CH12A
FRCH12A
CH14A
CH15B
CH15C
CH19B
CH22A
CH22B
CH24A
CH26A
CH27A
CH28A
CH28B
FRCH28B
CH29A
FRCH29A
CH29B
CH29C
CH30A
CH30B
CH31A
CH31B
CH31C
CH32A
FRCH32A
CH33A
CH33B
CH34A
CH34B
CH35A
CH35B
CH36A
CH36B
CH37A
CH39A
CH40A
CH40B
FRCH40B
CH41B
CH42B
CH43A
CH43B
CH44A
CH45A
103
105
RD08XX
RD18
RD24
RL04
FRRL04
Date
10-18-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10- 16-39
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
Tempe r a t u r e
( C)
11.5
10.7
12.5
12.9
8. 1
9.5
10.2
17.5
17.5
11.6
NM
16.7
16.2
16.9
13.1
11.5
10.3
9.4
10.9
12.1
9.8
10.6
NM
17.9
NM
16.5
17.2
12.9
11.4
12.9
12.3
10.9
11.9
NM
10.2
11.5
13.3
12.5
11.8
12.4
10.7
9.9
13.8
11.6
11.5
1 1
NM
10.4
9.9
13.2
12
1 1
15.6
14.1
12.6
10
9.4
8. 1
9.7
NM
PH
(SU)
6.72
8.01
6.68
6.64
7.75
7.11
7.96
7.63
7.59
6.6
NM
7.74
8.33
8.9
7.94
6.91
7.6
6.51
6.68
6.68
7.68
7.09
NM
7.71
NM
8.04
9.35
7 .46
7.42
6.89
7.01
10.08
7.68
NM
6.64
7.49
6.7
7.95
7.7
7.5
6.96
6.81
7.71
6.77
6.8
6.85
NM
6.7
6.77
7.98
7.68
6.72
7.47
8.78
6. 38
6.67
6.56
7.28
6.2
NM
speci f ic
conduct ivi ty
(umhos/cm at
25 deg. O
616
588
1200
1451
287
870
852
1294
1235
1093
NM
839
728
430
577
959
567
1453
627
943
862
562
NM
1224
NM
602
355
1781
1923
1847
2386
432
1694
NM
1648
1562
1044
933
1087
1471
2381
2292
1289
820
1370
1528
NM
1271
688
1322
1216
1389
1355
1151
2128
1000
872
529
1873
NM
purged
vo I ume
(gal Ions)
4
5
5.5
18
19
3
6
6
10
4
(a)
NR
17
30
4
3
2. 5
7.5
6
5
6
21
(a)
6
(a)
15
NR
10
16
10
17
10
8
(a)
8
17
7
18
2.5
16
15
24
5
6.7
7
18
(a)
18
21
5
17
6
NR
3
5.5
16
15
26
3
(a)
comments/
Observat ions
si ight oi 1 sheen
purged dry after 5 gallons
--
--
Purged dry after 19 gallons
Purged dry after 3 gallons
--
slight odor in purge bucket, small oily sheen

slight oily sheen on water
--
--
--
--
--
Purged dry after 3 gallons, very slow recharge

water was dark gray and had a slight oily odor
SI ight odor

--
--
--

--
--
Purged dry

--
--

Purged dry after 10 gallons

--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
si ight oi ly odor
--
--
--
--
--
--
slight oily sheen in bucket
--
--
Purged dry alter 3 gallons
--
--
--
--
--
--

-------
page 2 of 2
                                                                Table 2
                                                    Monitoring wells Field Parameters
                                                       C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                       Technical Memorandum NO. 9
wel 1
Number
RL06
RL29
FRRL29
RW10
RW14
RW21
RW22
RW23
FRRW23
RW24
RW30
FB01
FB02
FB03
FB04
FB05
FB06
Date
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10- 18-89
10-19-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
Temperature
( C)
8. 1
12.5
MM
7.5
9.5
9
9.7
9
MM
6.8
9 .6
MM
NM
NM
NM
14.2
NM
PH
(SU)
6.4
6.35
NM
6.31
6.9
6.56
6.45
6.65
NM
6.54
6.69
NM
NM
NM
NM
7 .98
NM
spec! r ic
Conduct ivi ty
(umhos/cm at
25 deg. c)
1511
2533
NM
2138
2029
1176
1412
1029
NM
2044
1156
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
Purged
vo 1 ume
(gal Ions)
2
5
(a)
2
8
8
9
9
(a)
5
6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
comments/
Observat ions
strong oily odor and oil sheen in bucket
Purged dry after 5 gallons
--
septic-type odor, purged dry after 2 gallons
Oily odor
--
sept ic-type odor
--
--
Odor f rom wel 1 . oily sheen in samp le
Oily odor
--
--
--
--
--
--
NOTE:
  FR - Field Repl icate
  NM - Not Measured
  NR - Not Recorded
  NA - Not applicable

 (a) The field  replicate samples were  taken  immediately after collection of the
     initial field sample bottles.  The well was not purged between initial and field
     replicate  sample collections.

-- NO comments/observations  recorded

-------
page 1  of  2
                                                            Table 3
                                                 SAMPLE  IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                                      MONITORING WELLS
                                                   C&H LANDFILL  PHASE III  Rl
                                                  Technical  Memorandum NO.  9
                                                                                                      Laboratory
sample Number
CH-CWCH01A-03
CH-CWCH01B-03
CH-CWCH02A-03
CH-CWCH03B-03
CH-CWCH03C-03
CH-CWCH04B-03
CH-CWCH08B-03
CH-CWCH09A-03
CH-CWCH09B-03
CH-CWCH12A-03
CH-FRCWCH12A-03
CH-CWCH14A-03
CH-CWCH15B-03
CH-CWCH15C-03
CH-CWCH19B-03
CH-CWCH22A-03
CH-CWCH22B-03
CH-CWCH24A-03
CH-CWCH26A-03
CH-CWCH27A-03
CH-CWCH28A-03
CH-CWCH28B-03
CH-FRCWCH28B-03
CH-CWCH29A-03
CH-FRCWCH29A-03
CH-CWCH29B-03
CH-CWCH29C-03
CH-CWCH30A-03
CH-CWCH30B-03
CH-CWCH31A-03
a-l-CWCH31B-03
CH-CWCH31C-03
CH-CWCH32A-03
CH-FRCWCH32A-03
CH-CWCH33A-03
CH-CWaH33B-03
CH-CWCH34A-03
CH-CWCH34B-03
CH-CWCH35A-03
Q-1-CWCH358-03
CH-CWCH36A-03
CH-CWCH36B-03
CH-CWCH37A-03
CH-CWCH39A-03
CH-CWCH40A-03
CH-CWCH40B-03
CH-FRCWCH40B-03
CH-CWCH41B-03
CH-CWCH42B-03
CH-CWCH43A-03
CH-CWCH43B-03
CH-CWCH44A-03
CH-CWCH45A-03
CH-CWI03-03
CH-CWI05-03
CH-CWRD08XX-03
CH-CWRD18-03
CH-CWRD24-03
CH-CWRL04-03
OTR NO.
EEY61
EEY62
EEY39
EEYOO
EEY01
EEY32
EEY02
EEY03
EEY04
EEY40
EEY74
EEY05
EEY06
EEY07
EEY08
EEY63
EEY64
EEY41
EEY42
EEY09
EEY10
EEY1 1
EEY71
EEY12
EEY69
EEY13
EEY14
EEY15
EEY16
EEY17
EEY18
EEY19
EEY28
EEY47
EEY20
EEY29
EEY21
EEY22
EEY30
EEY31
EEY23
EEY24
EEY25
EEY33
EEY73
EEY51
EEY27
EEY34
EEY35
EEY52
EEY53
EEY54
EEY55
EEY65
EEY43
EEY66
EEY44
EEY56
EEY45
ITR NO.
MEBF61
MEBF62
MEBF39
MEBFOO
MEBF01
MEBF32
MEBF02
MEBF03
MEBF04
MEBF40
MEBF74
MEBF05
ME8F06
MEBF07
MEBF08
MEBF63
MEBF64
MEBF41
MEBF42
MEBF09
MEBF10
MEBF1 1
MEBF71
MEBF12
MEBF69
MEBF13
MEBF 14
MEBF15
MEBF16
MEQF17
MEBF18
MEBF19
MEBF28
MEBF47
MEBF20
MEBF29
MEBF21
MEBF22
MEBF30
MEBF31
MEBF23
MEBF24
MEBF25
MEBF33
MEBF73
MEBF51
MEBF27
MEBF34
MEBF35
MEBF52
MEBF53
MEBF54
MEBF55
MEBF65
MEBF43
MEBF66
MEBF44
MEBF56
MEBF45
SAS NO.
4987E
..
--
E36
--
--
--
--
--
--
E41
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
E45
E43
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
E03
E04
--
£05
--
--
E02
E01
--
--
--
E39
E40
--
--
E42
E44
--
--
--
--
--
E38
--
E48
--
E49
col
Date
10-18-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10- 16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10- 16-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10- 18-89
10- 18-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10- 18-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10- 17-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10- 16-89
10-17-89
10- 18-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
lect ion
Time
1245
1710
1530
1745
1731
1515
1651
1506
1520
1605
1605
1515
1 130
1239
1655
1135
1135
0847
1135
1030
0853
0922
0922
1219
1219
1157
1209
1355
1415
0932
0912
1028
1152
1152
1050
0855
1647
0914
1027
1105
0920
0950
1440
1528
1424
1451
1451
1658
0932
1402
1434
1130
1605
1442
1440
1645
1340
0930
1526
Shipment
Date
10- 18-89
10- 17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10- 16-89
10-16-89
10-16-89
10- 16-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-19-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10- 18-89
10- 18-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10- 19-89
10- 17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10- 16-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
Organics .
compounds
COMPU
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
COMPU
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
Me t a I s
KEYTX
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
convent ional
Parameters

--
ICM
--
--
--
--
--
--
ICM
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
--
--
--
--

--
--
--

--
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
ICM

--
ICM
ICM
--

--
ICM
ICM
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
--
--
--
--
ICM

ICM

ICM

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                                            Table 3
                                                 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
                                                       MONITORING WELLS
                                                   C&H LANDFILL PHASE III Rl
                                                  Technical Memorandum NO. 9
                                                                                                      Laboratory
sample Number
CH-FRCWRL04-03
CH-CWRL06-03
CH-CWRL29-03
CH-FRCWRL29-03
CH-CWRW10-03
CH-CWRW14-03
CH-CWRW21-03
CH-CWRW22-03
CH-CWRW23-03
CH-CWRW24-03
CH-CWRW30-03
CH-CWFB01-03
CH-CWFB02-03
CH-CWFB03-03
CH-CWFB04-03
CH-CWFB05-03
CH-CWFB06-03
CH-CWTB01-03
CH-CWTB02-03
CH-CWTB03-03
CH-CWTB04-03
CH-CWTB06-03
OTR NO.
EEY48
EEY46
EEY57
EEY76
EEY58
EEY67
EEY36
EEY37
EEY38
EEY59
EEY60
EEY49
EEY50
EEY68
EEY70
EEY72
EEY75
EFQ76
EFQ77
EFQ78
EFQ79
EEY99
ITR NO. •
MEBF48
MEBF46
MEBF57
MEBF76
MEBF58
ME8F67
MEBF36
MEBF37
MEBF38
MEBF59
MEBF60
MEBF49
MEBF50
MEBF68
MEBF70
MEBF72
MEBF75
--
--
--
--

SAS NO.
4987E
£53
£46
--
--
--
--
£50
E51
E52
--
--
E37
£47
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
col
Date
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-17-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
lect ion
Time
1526
1053
1720
1720
1152
1325
1510
1535
1602
0852
1449
1330
1320
1610
1620
1200
1610
1445
1530
1320
1400
1315
Shipment
Date
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10- 19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-19-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10-18-89
10-16-89
10-17-89
10- 17-89
10- 18-89
10-18-89
10-19-89
Organics .
compounds
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
PEI
PEI
PEI
COMPU
COMPU
Me t a I s
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
KEYTX
WEYER
WEYER
WEYER
KEYTX
--
--

--

convent ional
Parameters
I CM
ICM
--
--
--
--
ICM
ICM
ICM
--
--
ICM
ICM
--
.-
--

--
--
--
--
--
FR - Field Repl icate
FB - Field Blank
TB - Trip Blank
PEI - PEI Associates,  inc.. OH
WEYER - Weyerhaeuser company. WA
COMPU - compuchem Laboratories. NC
KEYTX - Keystone Environmental Resources. TX
ICM - industrial  corrosion Management. NJ
-- - Not sampled
conventional  parameters  include oil and grease. BOD. COD. TOC. total  phosphate.  TDS.
  alkalinity, chloride,  ammonia, nitrate plus nitrite, and sulfate.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 9
Page 4
January 3, 1990
GL065561.FI.FQ
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Following sample collection, the bottles were returned to the sample preparation area,
decontaminated in a trisodium phosphate and tap water solution, and rinsed with deionized
water.  The metals samples were filtered and the samples were preserved according to the
provisions of the QAPP. After preservation, samples were placed in iced coolers.  Sample
custody was maintained by the CH2M HILL project team until samples were shipped to
the designated CLP laboratory. Table 3 documents sample  numbers,  types, dates of
shipment, and  collection and laboratory destinations.

DECONTAMINATION PRACTICES

Stainless steel bailers used  for sampling wells were decontaminated between sample
locations.  Bailers were washed with a trisodium phosphate and tap water solution, a tap
water rinse, a  10-percent methanol and water solution, and rinsed with deionized water
and air dried.
bcb/GLT863/073.50

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
                                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
TO:

FROM:

DATE:

PREPARED BY:

RE:



PROJECT:
Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

Isaac H. Johnson

July 21, 1989

Jan Williams

Round 1, 2, and 3 Analytical Results and Data Validation
Phase III RI
G&H Landfill

GLO65561.DE.DV
                                INTRODUCTION

This technical memorandum presents the analytical data collected during the Round I, II,
and III Field Sampling as part of the Phase III RI at the G&H Landfill site, and the
quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) evaluation of those data.  The purpose of data
validation is to verify that the QA/QC requirements of  a data set have been met, to
characterize the weaknesses of questionable data (possibly limiting its use), and to
determine which data are unusable.

The QA/QC procedures are documented in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)
for this project (CH2M HILL 1988) and include both field sampling and laboratory
analysis.  Data review is performed by U.S. EPA's Region 5  Central Regional  Laboratory
(CRL) according to regional SOPs based on the Laboratory Data Validation Functional
Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (U.S. EPA 1988), and the Laboratory Data
Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organics Analyses (U.S. EPA 1988). These
reviews, plus additional observations by CH2M HILL, are incorporated into the final data
validation written for each set of data before  its use. QA/QC, data  review procedures,
and the results of the data validation for the  G&H Landfill site are  summarized below.
                      FIELD AND LABORATORY QA/QC

The analyses discussed below are made to characterize the quality of a data set.  They
consist of analyzing blank, duplicate, field replicate, and spike samples to evaluate data
precision, accuracy, and contamination.  The results of the QA/QC analyses are discussed
along with the raw analytical data, and are used for data  review and validation.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 2
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
BLANKS

A blank is a clean sample equivalent that is processed and analyzed as a sample to
determine the  existence and magnitude of potential contamination introduced during
sampling or analysis. In the field, High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
water is used for aqueous blanks, and clean sands are used for soil blanks. Blanks are
treated with the same procedures as samples from the field through laboratory analysis
and reporting.   Laboratory preparation blanks (reagent blanks) are prepared from
contaminant-free water in the laboratory and processed along with the samples through
each sample preparation  and analysis step.  Field blanks identify contamination from
decontamination, sampling, bottle transport, and laboratory procedures.  Trip blanks
identify contamination from bottles and bottle transport.  Laboratory blanks identify
laboratory contamination.

QUANTITATION LIMITS

A quantitation limit is the minimum amount of a chemical that can be consistently
detected  and quantified.  An individual laboratory's detection  limits may be lower than the
Contract Required Quantitation Limits (CRQL) or Contract Required Detection Limits
(CRDL)  for inorganic compounds established for the Contract Laboratory Program  (CLP).
In this case, data  lower than the CRQL or CRDL are reported; these data are considered
estimated because the accuracy of quantitation below these levels is uncertain.
Contamination or other analytical problems (such as low sample recoveries) may cause the
actual quantitation limit to be higher than that reported by the laboratory. When this
occurs, it is noted in the  laboratory validation writeup.  Tables 10-1  and 10-2 present the
target compounds or elements  that were analyzed by the CLP laboratories and the CRQLs
and CRDLs.

SPIKE RECOVERIES

Spike sample analyses are done to determine the effect of the sample matrix on extraction,
digestion, and  measurement procedures.  Spike recoveries are also used to determine the
accuracy of the analyses,  which is a measure of the agreement between an experimental
determination  and the true value of the parameter being measured. In general,  a known
amount of compound is added to a sample, the sample is analyzed,  and the amount of
spike compound recovered by analysis is compared to the amount added.  The type of
spikes vary from organic  to inorganic analyses and from low to high concentration analyses.

A "surrogate spike" in organic analysis is a compound not expected to be present in
environmental samples, but with properties similar to those of the target compounds.  It is
added to all samples before extraction and other sample preparation.  Percent recovery
(%R) is calculated by the formula:

-------
                            Table  10-1
                    TARGET ANALYTE LIST AND
             .CONTRACT-REQUIRED DETECTION LIMITS
                                       Detection Limit
        Inorganic Target         Low Concentration Analysis3
           Analyte	         	Water (ug/1)	

        Aluminum                           200
        Antimony                            60
        Arsenic                              10
        Barium                             200
        Beryllium                             5
        Cadmium                               5
        Calcium                           5,000
        Chromium                            10
        Cobalt                              50
        Copper                              25
        Iron                                100
        Lead                                  5
        Magnesium                         5,000
        Manganese                            15
        Mercury                               0.2
        Nickel                              40
        Potassium                         5,000
        Selenium                             5
        Silver                              10
        Sodium                           5,000
        Thallium                            10
        Vanadium                            50
        Zinc                                 20
        Cyanide                              10
aThe  detection  limits for samples may be  considerably higher
 depending on the sample matrix.
                                                     [12/87]


GLT863/035.50

-------
                                      Table 10-2 (Page 1 of 3)
                                      TARGET COMPOUND LIST AND
                                CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTITATION LIMITS
                                                                    Quantisation Limits
                                                                 Low Concentration Analysis3
Volatile                               CAS Number

 1.  Cbloromethane                      74-87-3
 2.  Bromomethane                       7A-83-9
 3.  Vinyl Chloride                     75-01-4
 4.  Chloroethane                       75-00-3
 5.  Methylene Chloride                 75-09-2

 6.  Acetone                            67-64-1
 7.  Carbon Disulfide                   75-15-0
 8.  1,1-Dlchloroethene                 75-34-4
 9.  1,1-Dichloroethane                 75-35-3
10.  1,2-DIchloroethene  (total)        540-59-0

11.  Chloroform                         67-66-3
12.  1,2-Dlchloroethane                107-06-2
13.  2-Butanone                         78-93-2
14.  1,1,1-Trichloroethane              71-55-6
15.  Carbon Tetrachloride               56-23-5

16.  Vinyl Acetate                     108-05-4
17.  Bromodichloromethane               75-27-4
18.  1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          79-34-5
19.  1,2-Dichloropropane                78-87-5
20.  Cis-l,3-Dichloropropene          10061-02-5

21.  Trichloroethene                    79-01-6
22.  Dibromochloromethane              124-48-1
23.  1,1,2-Trlchloroethane              79-00-5
24.  Benzene                            71-43-2
25.  Trans-l,3-Dlchloropropene        10061-01-6

26.  Bromoform                          75-25-2
27.  2-Hexanone                        591-78-6
28.  4-tiethyl-2-pentanone              108-10-1
39.  Tetrachloroethene                 127-18-4
30.  Toluene                           108-88-3

31.  Chlorobenzene                     108-90-7
32.  Ethyl Benzene                     100-41-4
33.  Styrene                           100-42-5
34.  Xylenes  (total)                   133-02-7

Semivolatlle

35.  Phenol                            108-95-2
36.  bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether           111-44-4
37.  2-Chlorophenol                     95-57-8
38.  1,3-Dichlorobenzene              541-73-1
39.  1,4-Dichlorobenzene              106-46-7

40.  Benzyl Alcohol                    100-51-6
41.  1,2-Dichlorobenzene               95-50-1
42.  2-Methylphenol                     95-48-7
43.  bls(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether     39638-32-9
Water
(Tl 8/D
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Soil/Sedimentb
(]lg/kg)
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
Note:   Specific  quantitation limits are highly matrix dependent.   The  quantisation
        limits  listed herein are provided for guidance and may  not  always  be  achievable.
aQuantltation  limits listed for soil/sediment are based  on wet weight.  The  quantitation limits
  calculated  by the  laboratory for soil/sediment,  calculated  by dry weight as required by the
.contract, will  be  higher.
"Medium soil/sediment CRQLs for volatile TCL compounds are  100 times the  individual low soil/
  sediment CRQL;  for semlvolatile TCL compounds they are  60 times the individual low soil/sediment
  CRQL.

-------
                                      Table  10-2 (Page 2 of 3)
Semivolatile (Continued)
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.

49.
50.
51.
52.
53.

54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
4 -Mecnyipnenoj.
N-Nitroso Dipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isopborone

2-Nltrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzole acid
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dlcblorophenol

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroanlllne
Hexachlorobutadlene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
 CAS Number
 1116-44-3
 621-64-7
  67-72-1
  98-95-3
  78-59-1

  88-75-5
 105-67-9
  65-85-0
 111-91-1
 120-83-2

 120-82-1
  91-20-3
 106-47-8
  87-68-3

  59-50-7

  91-57-6
  77-47-4
  88-06-2
  95-95-4
  91-58-7

  88-74-4
 131-11-3
 208-96-8
 606-20-2
  99-09-2

  83-32-9
  51-28-5
 100-02-7
 132-64-9
 121-14-2

  84-66-2
7005-72-3
  86-73-7
 100-01-6
 534-52-1

  86-30-6
 101-55-3
 118-74-1
  87-86-5
  85-01-8

 120-12-7
  84-74-2
 206-44-0
 129-00-0
  85-68-7
Note:  Specific quantltatlon limits are highly matrix dependent.  The quantItation
       limits listed herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable.
aQuantitation limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight.  The quantitation limits
 calculated by the laboratory for soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight as required by the
.contract, will be higher.
"Medium soil/sediment CRQLs for volatile TCL compounds are 100 times the individual low soil/
 sediment CRQL; for semlvolatile TCL compounds they are 60 times the individual low soil/sediment
 CRQL.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
2 -Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
2 , 4 , 5-Trichlorophenol
2 - Chlo roanaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2 , 6-Dinltrotoluene
3-Nitroanlllne
Acenaphthene
2 , 4-Dinit rophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2 , 4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-nitrosodlphenylamlne
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Dl-n-butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Quantitation Limits
Low Concentration Analysis a
Water
(Tlg/1)
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
1C
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
Soil/Sedimentb
(pg/kg)
33U
330
330
330
330
330
330
1,600
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1,600
330
1,600
330
330
330
1,600
330
1,600
1,600
330
330
330
330
330
1,600
1,600
330
330
330
1,600
330
330
330
330
330
330

-------
                                      Table 10-2  (Page 3 of 3)
                                                                    Quantisation Limits
                                                                 Low Concentration Analysis8
Semivolatile (Continued)

89.  3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
90.  Benzo[a]anthracene
91.  Chrysene
92.  bls(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
93.  Di-n-octyl phthalate

94.  Benzo[bjfluoranthene
95.  Benzo [k] f luoranthene
96.  Benzo[a]pyrene
97.  Indenof1,2,3-cd]pyrene
98.  Dibenz[a,h]anthracene

99.  Benzo[g,h,i]perylene

Pesticides/PCBs
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
alpha-BHC
beta-BBC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Heptachlor epoxlde
Endosufan I
Dieldrln
4,4' -DDE
Endrin
Endosulfan II
4, 4' -ODD
Endosulfan Sulf ate
4, 4' -DDT
Endrin Ketone
Methoxychlor
alpha-Chlordane
gamma -Chlo rdane
Toxaphene
Arochlor-1016
Arochlor-1221
Arochlor-1232
Arochlor-1242
Arochlor-1248
      CAS Number

       91-94-1
       56-55-3
      218-01-9
      117-81-7
      117-84-0

      205-99-2
      207-08-9
       50-32-8
      193-39-5
       53-70-3

      191-24-2
                                       319-84-6
                                       319-85-7
                                       319-86-8
                                        58-89-9
                                        76-44-8

                                       309-00-2
                                       1024-57-3
                                       959-98-8
                                        60-57-1
                                        72-55-9

                                        72-20-8
                                     33213-65-9
                                        72-54-8
                                       1031-07-8
                                        50-29-3

                                     53494-70-5
                                        72-43-5
                                       5103-71-9
                                       5103-74-2
                                       8001-35-2
125. Arochlor-1254
126. Arochlor-1260
12674-11-2
11104-28-2
11141-16-5
53469-21-9
12672-29-6

11097-69-1
11096-82-5
Water
(PS/I)
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
Soil/Sedimentb
(Pg/kg)
660
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
160.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
160.0
160.0
Note:  Specific quantitation limits are highly matrix dependent.  The  quantitation
       limits listed herein are provided  for guidance and may not always be achievable.
aQuantitation limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight.  The quantitation  limits
 calculated by the laboratory  for  soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight  as required by  the
.contract, will be higher.
"Medium soil/sediment CRQLs for volatile  TCL compounds are 100 times the individual  low soil/
 sediment CRQL; for semlvolatlle TCL  compounds they are 60 times the individual  low  soil/sediment
 CRQL.
6LT863/036.50
                                                                                               [8/87]

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 3
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
                                        AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
      %R = SSR/SA x 100%

where:

      SSR = quantity measured in spiked sample
      SA  = quantity of spike added

A "matrix spike" consists of target compounds added to a sample just before analysis.  It
is analogous to the "method spike" done for high concentration inorganic analysis.  Both
analyses are performed to evaluate matrix effects on the analytical methodology and data
accuracy.

Percent recovery for a matrix spike is calculated by the formula:

      %R = SSR-SR x 100%

where:
SA
      SR  = quantity measured in unspiked sample
      SSR = quantity measured in spiked sample
      SA  = quantity of spike added
The "method spike" for high concentration inorganics and the "spike sample analysis" for
low and medium inorganic concentrations are the same.  The spike is added before any
reagents are added to the sample.  Percent recovery is calculated as for a matrix or
method spike.

A recovery above the control limits may indicate a high bias in the data, while a recovery
below the control limits may indicate a low bias and detection limits higher  than those
specified by the contract.

DUPLICATES/REPLICATES

Both field replicate and laboratory duplicate samples are analyzed to determine data
precision, a measure  of the reproducibility of field sampling and analysis.  The results are
reported as relative percent differences  (RPD)  and calculated by the formula:

      RPD =   Dl - D2   x  100%
               (Dl  + D2)/2
where:
       Dl = concentration of first duplicate/replicate

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 4
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
      D2 = concentration of second duplicate/replicate

An RPD result greater than the control limit indicates a lack of agreement between the
results.  The data associated with these results are questionable and are flagged estimated
or unusable.

SERIAL DILUTIONS

For an inorganic inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis, a serial dilution analysis is
made for each set of samples of similar matrix type and concentration.  For an analyte
concentration at least a factor of 10 above CRDL, the measured concentrations of the
undiluted sample, and of the sample after a five-fold dilution, should agree within
10 percent.  If the difference is greater than 10 percent, the results for that compound are
considered estimated because of matrix interference.

INSTRUMENT QC

Other instrument-specific tests  include initial and continuing calibration,
decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP) and bromofluorobenzene (BFB)  tuning for the
GC/MS,  and determining the linearity of standard calibration curves in GFAA analysis by
determining the coefficient of correlation (r).

Initial and continuing calibration of instruments with standard solutions are used to ensure
that the  instrument is capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. Calibration
verification results must fall within  control limits,  or the results are flagged estimated or
unusable.

Standard compounds, such as DFTPP and  BFB, are used  to tune and evaluate the
performance of the GC/MS. If mass calibration is in error or ion abundance criteria for
these compounds  is not met, then the associated  data are considered unusable.
The method of standard addition may be required of inorganic analysis. It involves a
three-point calibration curve prepared by spiking the sample matrix.  If  the correlation
coefficient of a standard calibration curve for the method  of standard addition is less than
0.995, the data are considered  estimated.
                       DATA REVIEW AND VALIDATION
CRL DATA REVIEW

The Sample Management Office receives data packages from the laboratories in the CLP
and distributes them to the Laboratory Sciences Services Section (LSSS) of the  U.S. EPA

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                   AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 5
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
Region 5 CRL. The LSSS reviews all data packages resulting from regional sampling
efforts.  The following items are reviewed (as stated in U.S. EPA guidelines):

          Sample holding times at the CLP laboratory
          GC/MS tuning and performance (organics)
          Instrument calibration
          Blanks
          Interference check sample analysis (inorganics)
          Surrogate recoveries (organics)
          Matrix and analytical spike analysis
          Duplicate sample  analysis
          Compound identification (organics)
          Overall assessment of data

DATA VALIDATION

After CH2M HILL receives the CRL-reviewed data packages, the reviewer's comments are
summarized in the final data validation before data interpretation by project staff.  Any
data noted in the review that should be qualified are flagged with  the appropriate symbol
(Table 10-3).  Results for field blanks and field replicates are reviewed (these  may or may
not have been considered by the LSSS)  and the data further qualified if necessary.
Finally, the data set as a whole is examined for consistency, anomalous results, and
whether the data are reasonable for the samples involved.  Table 10-3 lists the data
qualifiers used in this project and gives explanations of their use.  Data flagged with  a
qualifier may be used to a limited degree or may be completely unusable, depending on
the type of problem and significance of the data point.

Data review packages are identified by sample case numbers and traffic report numbers
for routine analytical services (RAS) and by SAS numbers for special analytical services
(e.g., fast turnaround times or high-hazard samples).  For RAS samples, a case number is
assigned to a group of samples collected at one time, and  individual samples are assigned
unique traffic report numbers to identify them from the time of sampling through
reporting of the analytical data.  For SAS samples, the first four numbers define a group
of samples and the final letters and numbers identify individual samples (e.g., SAS
3136-EO1, SAS 3136-E02).  CH2M HILL again assigns each sample a unique  identification
related to sampling location,  time of sampling, or depth of sample (e.g., GH-GH30A-02
for G&H  Landfill Round 2 sample collected from shallow  monitoring well, GH30A).

-------
                              Table  10-3
                           DATA QUALIFIERS


  Symbol
(Data Flag)                      Definition and Explanation

     B                  Blank Contamination

                        Chemical constituent  also found in
                        laboratory or field blank.   Data are not
                        flagged if sample concentration exceeds
                        blank concentration by at least a factor of
                        10 for common laboratory  contaminants
                        (methylene chloride,  acetone,  toluene,  2-
                        butanone,  and phthalate esters), or  a factor
                        of 5 for other contaminants.   Data not
                        meeting this criterion are flagged and are
                        considered unusable.   Data are not corrected
                        by subtracting the blank  value.

     J                  Estimated Value

                        Concentration was above the analytical
                        detection limit but less  than  CRQL or CRDL,
                        or one or more associated QA/QC parameters
                        were beyond control limits.

     R                  Unusable Data


     D                  Diluted Value
 Note:  All data qualified as estimated are usable at user's
 discretion.
 GLT863/037.50

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 6
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                        ROUND 1—FIELD SAMPLING

GROUNDWATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and two
field blanks were analyzed by Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory (ENSECO)
for inorganic analytes (Case 10968, SDG No, MET253, QC No. 88168. ITR
Nos. MET252-254, MET256-271 and MET274) by low concentration procedures. The data
results are presented in Table 1.  The data are qualified as follows:

      •    The spike sample recovery for vanadium (0 percent) is below control limits.
          The data may be biased  low and the quantitation limits may be higher than
          reported  for this compound.  All detected results for these samples are
          considered estimated (flagged "J") and all undetected results are  considered
          unusable (flagged "R").

      •    The post-digestion spike  for furnace AA analysis was out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results are considered estimated (J) for
          lead (MET252, MET253. MET256, MET257, MET261, MET264, MET266,
          MET268, and MET271); selenium (MET252, MET253, MET256, MET257,
          MET260-271, and MET274); and thallium (MET252-254, MET256-258,
          MET261-271, and MET274).

      •    Aluminum (28.7  to 53.2 jig/1), barium  (3.2 to 9.8 pg/1), calcium (391 to
          838 yg/1), copper (3.9 pg/1), iron (19.7 to 41.7 jig/1), magnesium (48.7 to
          146 vgfl), potassium (222 ng/1),  sodium (1,080 to 1,840 jig/1) and zinc (4.8 to
          267 yg/1) were found in the field blanks from this sampling  round.  Samples
          associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations
          less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged
          "B").

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and one
field blank were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case 10968, SDG
No. MET272,  QC No. 88170, ITR Nos. MEBG01-06, MET272, MET273, MET275-278,
MET281, MET282, MET284, MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, and MEW490) by
low concentration procedures.  The  data results are presented in Table 1. The data are
qualified as follows:

      •    The spike sample recovery for  thallium (53 percent) is below control limits.
          The data may be biased low and the  quantitation limits may be higher than
          reported for this compound.  Positive results for these samples are considered
          estimated (flagged "J").  Spike sample recovery for mercury (200 percent)

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 7
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
          indicates a high bias, although all results for this compound were below
          instrument detection limits and the data are considered acceptable.

     •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results are considered estimated (J) for
          arsenic (MET277); lead (MEBG01-03, MEBG05, MET272, MET281, MET289);
          selenium (MEBG01-05, MET272, MET273, MET276-278, MET281, MET282,
          MET284, MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, and MEW490); and thallium
          (MEBG01-06, MET272, MET273, MET275, MET277, MET278, MET281,
         ' MET282, MET284, MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, AND MEW490).

     •    The serial dilution results (12 percent) indicate interference and the results for
          zinc for all samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    The field blanks listed with SDG No. MET253  also apply to this group.

     •    Because  of poor replicate results for samples MET284 and MET289 for zinc,
          the results for this compound in these samples are considered estimated (J).

Nineteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and two
field blanks were analyzed  by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case 10968, SDG
No. MEBGOO, QC No.  88176, ITR Nos. MEBGOO, MEBG07-10, MET279, MET280,
MET283, MET288,  and MEW491-500) by low concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table  1.  The data are qualified as  follows:

     •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results are considered estimated (J) for
          arsenic (MEBGOO, MEBG07, MEBG08, MEBG09, MEW493, and MEW496);
          lead (MEBG10); selenium (MEBGOO, MEBG07-08, MEBG10, MET279,
          MET280, MET283, MET288, and MEW491-500); and thallium (MEBGOO,
          MEBG08, MEBG09, MET279, MET280,  MET283, MET288, and
          MEW491-500).

     •    The serial dilution results (17 percent) indicate interference and the results for
          zinc for all samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    The results for  sodium in sample MET280 exceeded the linear range of the
          instrument and  the results are considered estimated (J).

     •    The method of standard addition correlation coefficient for arsenic on  sample
          MEW491 was less than 0.995 and  the results are considered estimated (J).

     •    The field blanks listed with SDG No. MET253 also apply to this group.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 8
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
GROUNDWATER—ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Residential Wells

Fifteen residential well groundwater samples including two replicate sets and two field
blanks were analyzed by CompuChem Laboratories (COMPU) for volatile and semi-
volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968/SAS
423 IE, OTR Nos. EALOO-03, EAL06-07, EAL10, EAL11, EAL13,  EAL14, EAL19, and
EAL22-25) by low concentration procedures.  Two trip blanks were also analyzed for
volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group  (EAL04 and EAL08).  The data
results are presented in Table 2.  The data are qualified as follows:

      •    Holding times were exceeded for the reanalysis of SVOC fractions for
          EAL03RE, EAL06RE and EAL22RE and all detected  results are considered
          estimated (J).

      •    Surrogate spike recoveries were  below control limits for more than SVOC
          surrogate for EAL03  (39, 0, and 0 percent), EAL06 (0 and 0 percent), and
          EAL22 (0 and 0 percent). These samples were reanalyzed but surrogate spike
          recoveries were still below control limits for more than one SVOC surrogate
          for EAL03RE (4 and 9 percent), EAL06 (0 and 0 percent), and EAL22RE
          (0 and 0 percent).  The  data may be biased low and the quantitation limits
          may be higher than reported.  All detected SVOC results for these samples are
          considered estimated  (flagged "J") and all undetected SVOC results  are
          considered unusable (flagged "R").

      •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone, 2-hexanone, and
          acrolein for all samples are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and
          unusable (R) for undetected results for these  compounds. Calibration outliers
          also caused the positive  results for acetone and  1,1,1-trichloroethane for all
          samples to be considered estimated (J).

      •    Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (5 yg/1) and
          bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (3 vg/1), were found in the method blanks.
          Methylene chloride (0.8  to 1 vg/1), acetone (4 to  14 yg/1), and toluene (0.6 jig/1),
          both common laboratory contaminants, were found in the field or trip blanks.
          Phenol (2 jig/1) was found in the field blank.  Samples associated with these
          blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5  times the
          phenol, or 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank concentrations
          are considered unusable (flagged "B").

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 9
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
MONITORING WELLS

Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by Environmental Science and Engineering (EMSI) for volatile and
semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968,
SDG No. EAL27, OTR Nos. EAL26-45) by low concentration procedures. The data
results are presented in Table 3.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples)  and
          3-nitroaniline (EAL27-31, EAL33, and EAL34) are considered estimated (J) for
          all detected results and unusable (R)  for undetected results  for these
          compounds. Calibration outliers also  caused the positive results for acetone
          (EAL32, EAL36, EAL38, EAL39, EAL43, EAL44 and EAL45) to be
          considered estimated (J).

     •    A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride  (2 to 6 jjg/1), was found
          in the method blanks.  N-nitrosodiphenylamine (2 iig/1)  was  found in the
          method blank.  The common laboratory contaminants, acetone (2 jig/1),
          methylene chloride (2 to 6 jig/1), and  toluene (1 to 3 yg/1) were found in the
          field and/or trip blanks. Tetrachloroethene (2 yg/1) and
          bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (53 yg/1) were also found in the field blank. Samples
          associated with these blanks  that contain these contaminants at concentrations
          less than 5 times the N-nitrosodiphenylamine, or 10 times the common
          laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are considered  unusable (flagged
          "B").

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAL29 were outside the control limits for
          4-nitrophenol.   The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits
          in the same sample for 1,4-dichlorobenzene.  The unspiked  sample was
          considered estimated by the  CRL reviewer for these compounds although
          neither was detected in the unspiked  sample.

Seventeen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets  and two
field blanks were analyzed by EMSI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs  (Case  10968,  SDG No. EAL46, OTR
Nos. EAL46, EAL47, EA49-52, EAL55, EAL57-60, EBGOO, EBG02-05, and EBG07) by
low concentration procedures.  Two trip blanks were also analyzed for  volatile  organic
compounds as part of this sample group (EAL48 and EBG01). The  data results are
presented in Table 3.  The data are qualified as  follows:

      •    The VOC fraction of sample EBG04  was diluted and reanalyzed  as EBG04DL.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 10
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples),
          3-nitroaniline (EAL47), and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (EAL46, EAL47, EAL49-52,
          EAL55, EAL57, EAL58, EAL59, EAL60, EBGOO, EBG02-05, and EBG07) are
          considered  estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for
          undetected results for these compounds.  Calibration outliers also caused the
          positive results for 2,4-dimethylphenol (EBG04) and acetone (EAL49-51,
          EAL55, EAL57-60, EBGOO, EBG03-05, and EBG04DL)  to be considered
          estimated (J).

     •    A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (2 to 3 pg/1), was found
          in the method blanks. Benzoic acid (10 jig/1) was also found in the method
          blank.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 5 times  the benzoic  acid, or 10 times the common
          laboratory contaminant concentrations are considered unusable (flagged  "B").

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAL58 were  outside  the control limits for
          4-nitrophenol. The  matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits
          for the same sample for pentachlorophenol.  The unspiked sample was
          considered  estimated by the CRL reviewer for both compounds although
          neither were detected in the unspiked sample.

     •    GC/MS tuning, the retention time marker specifically,  is  out of control limits
          for the pesticide marker for EAL46.  All pesticide  results for this sample are
          considered  estimated (J).

     •    Ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EBG04 exceeded the linear range  of the
          instrument.  Use the results for diluted sample EBG04 for these compounds.

     •    Field blanks from SDG No. EAL27 also apply to this  sample group.

Sixteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells were analyzed by EMSI for volatile
and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 10968, SDG No. EAL56, OTR Nos. EAL56, EBG06, and EBG08-20, EBG22) by
low concentration procedures.  One trip blank was also analyzed  for volatile organic
compounds as part of this sample group (EBG21). The data  results are presented in
Table 3.  The data are qualified as follows:

          The VOC fraction of sample EBG22 was  diluted and  reanalyzed as EBG22DL.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples) and
          4-chloroaniline (EBG06) are considered estimated (J)  for all detected results,
          and unusable (R) for undetected results for these compounds.  Calibration

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 11
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          outliers also caused the positive results for 2,4-dimethylphenol (all samples
          except EBG06) and acetone (all samples) to be considered estimated (J).

      •    Benzoic acid (10 yg/1) was found in the method blank. Samples associated with
          this blank that contain this contaminant at concentrations less than 5 times the
          benzoic acid concentration are considered unusable (flagged "B").

      •    Field blanks from SDG No. EAL27 also apply to this sample group.

      •    Because of poor replicate results for EAL56 and EBG05 for carbon disulfide,
          the results for this compound are  considered estimated (J)  and  should be used
          with caution.

Six groundwater  samples from monitoring wells including two field blanks were analyzed by
Wan Technologies, Inc. (WANTEC) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case  10968, SDG No. EAL53, OTR
Nos. EAL53, EAL54, and EBG23-26) by low concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table 3.  The data are qualified as follows:

      •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone and 4-chloroaniline
          for all samples are considered  estimated (J) for all detected results, and
          unusable (R) for nondetected results for these compounds.  Calibration outliers
          also caused the positive results to be  considered estimated  (J) for
          bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (all samples), 4,4'-DDT and methoxychlor (EBG25)
          and heptachlor, dieldrin, 4,4'-DDT, methoxychlor, aldrin, endrin, endosulfan
          sulfate, alpha-chlordane and gamma-chlordane (EAL53, EAL54, EBG23,
          EBG24, and EBG26).

      •    Common  laboratory contaminants, methylene  chloride (2 vg/1) and
          bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (7 yg/1)  were found  in the method blanks.
          Tetrachloroethene (1  jig/1) was also found in the method blank.  Samples
          associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at  concentrations
          less than 5 times the tetrachloroethene, or 10 times the common laboratory
          contaminant blank concentrations  are considered unusable (flagged "B").

      •    Field blanks from SDG No. EAL27 also apply to this sample group.

SURFACE SOIL—ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Fifteen soil samples were analyzed by WANTEC  for pesticides/PCBs including two sets of
replicates (Case  10968, SDG No. EAL53, OTR Nos. EBG27-41) by low concentration
procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 4.  The data are qualified as follows:

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 12
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
     •    Because of calibration outliers, the positive results are considered estimated (J)
          for 4,4'-DDT and methoxychlor (EBG30 and EBG35-40) and heptachlor,
          dieldrin, 4,4'-DDT, methoxychlor, aldrin, endrin, endosulfan sulfate, alpha-
          chlordane and gamma-chlordane (EBG27, EBG29, and EBG41).

Fourteen soil samples including one replicate set were analyzed by DataChem (DATAC)
for pesticides/PCBs including one replicate set (Case 11050, SDG No. EBG42, OTR
Nos. EBG42-55) by low concentration procedures. The data results are presented in
Table 4.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Holding times were for extraction of all samples and all detected results are
          considered estimated (J).

     •    Surrogate spike recoveries were  high for the pesticide surrogate for EBG42
          (999 percent). All detected pesticide/PCB results for this sample are
          considered estimated (flagged "J").

Twelve soil samples were analyzed by American Analytical and Technical Services (AATS)
for dioxins/furans including one replicate set (Case SAS 4308 E, Sample Nos. E12-23).
The  data results are presented in Table 4.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the positive results are considered estimated (J)
          for 2,3,7,8-TCDD, PENTA-CDD, HEXA-CDD, and HEPTA-CDD (all
          samples); HEXA-CDD, TETRA-CDD, TETRA-CDF, PENTA-CDF and
          HEXA-CDF,and  2,3,7,8-TCDD (E12-17); and PENTA-CDD, HEXA-CDD,
          TETRA-CDD, HEXA-CDF, and 2,3,7,8-TCDD (E18-23).

SURFACE SOIL—PHYSICAL PARAMETERS

Eleven soil samples were analyzed for grain size and six of these samples were also
analyzed for Atterberg  limits (Case SAS 4308, Sample Nos. E01-E11) by Chen and
Associates (CHEN). The data are qualified as follows:

     •    No  method  duplicates were run  as specified  in the SAS request forms and all
          data are considered estimated (J).

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 13
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
                        ROUND 2—FIELD SAMPLING

GROUNDWATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including three replicate sets, one
sample of a replicate set, and two field blanks were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic
analytes (Case 12417, ITR Nos. MEAA63-70 and MEAA73-84) by low concentration
procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:

     •    The post-digestion spike  for furnace AA analysis is  out of control limits
          indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
          lead (MEAA64-68, MEAA73, MEAA75, MEAA77, and MEAA79-84); arsenic
          (MEAA83); selenium (MEAA64-68, and MEAA73-84); and thallium
          (MEAA63-68, MEAA73-81, and MEAA83-84).

     •    Field duplicates for samples MEAA74-75 were out  of control limits for
          aluminum (83 RPD), copper (134 RPD), lead (170  RPD), and manganese (85
          RPD) and the results for these analytes  are considered estimated (J) in these
          samples.

     •    Beryllium (0.7 to 1.0 pg/1), iron (30.6 pg/1), and zinc (11 jig/1) were found in the
          calibration or preparation blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that
          contain  these contaminants at concentrations less than  5 times the blank
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one  sample  of a replicate set
and two field blanks were analyzed  by ENSECO for metals (Case 12417, ITR
Nos. MEAA85-87,  and  MEAC75-91) by low concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table  5. The data are qualified as follows:

     •    The post-digestion spike  for furnace AA analysis is  out of control limits
          indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
          lead (MEAA85, MEAA87, MEAC75-78, MEAC82,  MEAC84, MEAC86, and
          MEAC90); selenium (MEAA85-87, MEAC75-82, MEAC84-86, and
          MEAC88-91); and thallium (MEAA85-87, MEAC75-82, MEAC84-86, and
          MEAC88-91).

     •    Beryllium (0.5 jig/1) and  magnesium (140 to 330 pg/1) were found in the
          calibration blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are
          considered  unusable (flagged "B").

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 14
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Nine groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by Skinner and Sherman, Inc. (SKINER) for inorganic analytes
(Case 12417, ITR Nos. MEAC52-60) by low concentration procedures.  The data results
are presented in Table 5.  The data are qualified as follows:

      •    The spike sample recovery for thallium (72 percent) is below control limits.
          The data may be biased  low and the quantitation limits  may be higher than
          reported for this compound. All results for these samples are considered
          estimated (flagged "J").

      •    The post-digestion spike  for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results  are considered estimated (J)  for
          selenium (MEAC53-59) and thallium (MEAC52-59).

      •    Aluminum (41.6 yg/1), antimony  (20.9 to 30.3  jig/1), beryllium (0.6  to 1.1  yg/1),
          cadmium (3.5  jig/1), cobalt (4.5 to 7.6 vg/1), iron (25.6  iig/1), manganese (3.3 to
          4.1 jig/1), sodium (88.6 to 129.8 yg/1), and zinc (5.4 to  14.3 pg/1) were found in
          the calibration or preparation blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks
          that contain these contaminants  at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set and  one
field blank were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case 12417, ITR Nos.
MEAA42-43 and MEAA45-62) by low concentration procedures.  The data results are
presented in Table 5.  The data are qualified as follows:

      •    Duplicate injection precision exceeded control limits for MEAA55 for selenium
          and the result for selenium in  this sample is considered  estimated (J).

      •    The post-digestion spike  for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results  are considered estimated (J)  for
          selenium (MEAA42-43, MEAA46-47, MEAA49, MEAA51-53, MEAA58-59 and
          MEAA61); arsenic (MEAA45, MEAA50, MEAA54, MEAA57, MEAA60, and
          MEAA62); thallium (MEAA42-49, MEAA51, and MEAA53-62); and lead
          (MEAA47-49, MEAA51, MEAA53, MEAA56-58, and MEAA60-62).

      •    Beryllium (0.8 jig/1), copper (19.2 jig/1), iron (25.8 >ig/l), and zinc (4.7 yg/1) were
          found in the calibration or preparation blanks.  Samples associated with  these
          blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times  the
          blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 15
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •     Field duplicates for samples MEAA58 and MEAA59 were out of control limits
           for zinc (82 RPD) and the results for this analyte are considered estimated (J)
           in these samples.

Eighteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and two
field blanks were analyzed by ENSECO for inorganic analytes (Case  12417, ITR
Nos. MEAC61-62, MEAC65-72, and MEAC92-99) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 5. The data are qualified as follows:

     •     The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
           indicating interference effects.   The results are considered estimated (J) for
           lead (MEAC99); selenium (MEAC61, MEAC62, MEAC65-68, MEAC70-71,
           MEAC92-94, and MEAC96-99); and  thallium (MEAC61-62, MEAC65-68,
           MEAC70-71, MEAC92-97, and MEAC99).

     •     Beryllium (0.5 vg/1), magnesium (140 to 330 pg/1), and zinc (1.6 jig/1) were
           found in the calibration or preparation blanks.  Samples associated  with these
           blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
           blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •     The serial dilution results for zinc (20.1 percent), barium  (10.5 percent), iron
           (10.2 percent), and manganese (11.7  percent) indicate  interference and the
           results for these analytes are considered estimated (J).

           Barium (3 to 8.9 yg/1), beryllium (0.5 yg/1), calcium (156 to 3,160 jig/1), copper
           (6.7 to 15.8 ng/1), iron (22.5 to 67.2 iig/1), magnesium (76.4 to 859 jig/1),
           manganese (3 jig/1), nickel (5.8 pg/1),  sodium (526 to 1,920 t»g/l), potassium
           (238  jig/1), and zinc (1.8 to 9.2 jig/1) were found in the field blanks.   Samples
           associated with these  blanks (all groundwater sample groups listed above) that
           contain these contaminants at  concentrations less than 5 times the blank
           concentrations  are considered  unusable (flagged "B").

Seven groundwater samples including two replicate sets were analyzed by JTC
Environmental Consultants (JTC) for inorganic analytes (Case SAS 4208E, ITR
Nos. MEAC44 and MEAC46-51) by high concentration  procedures.   The data  has not yet
been received (as of March, 1990).

GROUNDWATER—ORGANIC ANALYSES

Eighteen monitoring  well groundwater samples including three replicate sets and two field
blanks were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile  organic compounds (VOCs
and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDA63-70 and EDA73-82) by
low concentration procedures.  Two trip blanks were also analyzed for volatile  organic

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 16
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
compounds as part of this sample group (EDA71 and EDA72).  The data results are
presented in Table 5.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    The VOC fraction of sample EDA79 was diluted and reanalyzed as EDA79DL.

     •    Holding times were exceeded for the pesticide/PCB fraction extractions for
          EDA63, EDA65-68, EDA70 and EDA73-74; all pesticide/PCB results for these
          samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample  EDA68 were outside the control limits for
          gamma-BHC. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits
          for the same sample for gamma-BHC, heptachlor, and dieldrin. The unspiked
          sample was considered estimated (J) by the CRL reviewer for these
          compounds.  Matrix spike recovery for sample EDA63 was slightly outside  the
          control limits for pyrene.  The unspiked sample was not qualified  by the CRL
          reviewer based on this result.

     •    Because  of calibration  outliers, the detected  results for chloroethane
          (EDA63-67, EDA74-77, and EDA79-82), methylene  chloride (EDA79-82),
          acetone (EDA78-82), chlorobenzene (EDA79-82) and bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
          (EDA79-82)  are considered estimated (J).  Also because of calibration outliers,
          the results for 2-butanone (EDA69 and EDA71-72)  are considered estimated
          (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for these
          compounds.

     •    Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (9 jig/1), methylene chloride (1 to
          2  vg/1) and di-n-butylphthalate (3 jig/1) were  found in the method blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are considered
          unusable (flagged  "B").

     •    Benzene, ethylbenzene, and xylene in EDA79 exceeded the linear range of the
          instrument and the results for these compounds in this sample  are considered
          estimated (J).  Use the results from the diluted sample EDA79DL for these
          compounds.

Nine monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by EMSI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF52-60) by low concentration
procedures.   The data results are  presented in  Table 5.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples) are
          considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 17
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
          nondetected results for these compounds.  Also because of calibration outliers,
          the detected results for acetone (all samples), 1,2-dichloroethene (all samples),
          2,4-dimethylphenol (all samples), benzoic acid (EDF57), and 4-chloroaniline (all
          samples) are considered estimated (J).

     •    A common laboratory contaminant, acetone (9 jig/1), was found in a method
          blank.  Samples associated with this blank that contain  these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times  the blank concentrations are considered
          unusable (flagged "B").

One monitoring well groundwater sample was analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-
volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR
No. EDA83) by low concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 5.
The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Surrogate spike  recoveries were low for the pesticide surrogate for EDA83
          (0 percent).  The CRL reviewer determined that the pesticide surrogate was
          present but the  peak was shifted  due to phthalate contamination.  All pesticide/
          PCB results for  this  sample  are considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA83 were slightly outside the control
          limits for trichloroethene and benzene.  The unspiked sample was not qualified
          by the CRL reviewer based  on these results.

Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set, one  sample of a
replicate set, and two field  blanks were analyzed by Environmental Control Technology
Corporation (ENCOT) for  volatile and  semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF77-96)  by low concentration
procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 5. The data  are qualified as follows:

     •    The SVOC fraction  of sample EDF92 was diluted and  reanalyzed  as
          EDF92DL.

     •    Holding times were  exceeded for  the SVOC fraction extraction for EDF95 and
          all SVOC  results are considered estimated (J).

     •    Benzene in sample EDF89 and 4-methylphenol in EDF86 exceeded the linear
          range  of the instrument,  but the samples were not diluted and reanalyzed.  The
          results for these compounds in these samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (all samples) are
          considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                   AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 18
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
          nondetected results for this compound.  Also, because of calibration outliers,
          the detected results for all pesticides (EDF92) are considered estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike recovery for sample EDF83 was slightly outside the control limits
          for endrin. The matrix spike duplicate RPD for sample EDF84 was slightly
          outside the control limits for chlorobenzene.  The unspiked sample was not
          qualified by the CRL reviewer based on this result.

     •    Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (4 to 13 yg/1), acetone
          (10 jig/1), and di-n-butylphthalate (1 to 4 jig/1) were found in the method blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Naphthalene in EDF92 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the
          result for this compound in  this  sample is considered estimated. Use the result
          from the diluted sample EDF92DL for this compound.

Sixteen groundwater samples  from monitoring wells including one replicate set and two
field blanks were analyzed by COMPU for  volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDA84-87, EDF61-62,
EDF65-72, and EDF75-76) by low concentration procedures. Four trip blanks were also
analyzed for volatile organic compounds as  part of this sample group  (EDF63, EDF64,
EDF73, and EDF74).  The data results are presented in Table 5.  The data are qualified
as follows:

          The SVOC and pesticide/PCBs fraction of sample EDA86  was diluted and
          reanalyzed as EDA86DL.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for benzene (EDF61-66)
          are considered estimated  (J).

     •    The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits for EDF65 for
          1,1-dichloroethene.  The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) by the
          CRL reviewer for this compound.

     •    Methylene chloride (3 to  4 yg/1) and acetone (10 jig/1) were found in the
          method blanks. Samples  associated with these blanks that contain  these
          contaminants at concentrations less than  10 times the blank concentrations  are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Naphthalene and  4-methylphenol in EDA86 exceeded the  linear range of the
          instrument and the results for these compounds in this sample are  considered

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 19
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted sample EDA86DL for these
          compounds.

     •    The laboratory qualified the results for Aroclor-1254 in sample EDA86DL with
          a "C," but did not explain what this qualify meant.  The results from this
          analysis should be  used with caution pending clarification from the laboratory.

Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs
and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case  12417, OTR Nos. EDA43-62) by low
concentration procedures.   The data results are presented in Table 5. The data are
qualified as follows:

     •    The VOC fraction of sample EDA49 was diluted  and  reanalyzed as EDA49RE.

     •    Holding time was exceeded for the pesticide/PCB fraction extraction for
          EDA57 and all pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered estimated
          (J)-

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for acetone (EDA57-61), methylene
          chloride (EDA43-52 and EDA49RE), chloroethane (EDA43-52 and
          EDA49RE), and trichloroethene (EDA57-61) are considered estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike  recovery for sample EDA62 was outside  the control limits for
          4,4-DDT. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the control limits for
          the same sample for 4,4-DDT and gamma-BHC.  The unspiked sample was
          considered estimated (J) by the CRL reviewer for these compounds.

     •    Methylene chloride (1 to 5 jig/1) was found in the method blanks. Samples
          associated with these blanks that contain this contaminant at concentrations less
          than 10 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    GC/MS tuning requirements, specifically  the pesticide/PCB retention time
          marker shift, are out of control limits for EDA58 and EDA49.  All pesticide/
          PCB results for  these samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    Vinyl chloride and 1,1-dichloroethene in  EDA49 exceeded the linear range of
          the instrument and the results for these compounds in this sample are
          considered estimated. Use the results from the diluted sample EDA49RE for
          these compounds.

Three  monitoring well groundwater samples including  one sample of a replicate set were
analyzed by ENCOT for volatile and  semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs),

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 20
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF97-99) by low concentration procedures.
The data results are presented in Table 5.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    4-Methylphenol in EDF99 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and no
          dilution or reanalysis of the sample was done. The results for this compound
          in this sample are considered estimated (J).

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EDF97 and EDF99)
          are considered estimated  (J) for all detected  results and unusable (R) for
          nondetected results for this compound.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDF85 (from another sample delivery
          group) were outside the control limits for benzene, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol,
          1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, and endrin. The matrix spike
          duplicate RPD was outside the control limits for the same sample for
          trichloroethene and benzene.  The unspiked sample was considered estimated
          (J) by the CRL reviewer  for these compounds.

     •    Methylene chloride (4 to  13 jig/1) and acetone (10 pg/1) were found in the
          method blanks. Samples  associated with these blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the  blank concentrations are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").
      •    Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (1 to 23 ygyi), toluene
          (1 to 36 jig/1), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (6 jig/1) were found in the field or
          trip blanks.  Xylene (20 jig/1), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (2 to 3 jig/1),
          4-methyl-2-pentanone (8 jig/1), and ethylbenzene (2 pg/1) were also found in the
          field or trip blanks. Samples associated with these blanks (all groundwater
          sample groups listed above) that contain these contaminants at concentrations
          less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant, or 5 times the other
          compound blank concentrations  are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Seven monitoring well groundwater samples including two replicate sets were analyzed by
AATS for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 12495, OTR Nos. EDF44, and EDF46-51) by high concentration
procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 5.  The data are  qualified as follows:

      •    The VOC fraction of sample EDF51 was analyzed as two phases, an aqueous
          and  a nonaqueous phase.  The SVOC and pesticide/PCB fractions of samples
          EDF47 and EDF51 were analyzed as two phases, an aqueous and a
          nonaqueous phase.  The sample phases are designated as EDF47A or
          EDF47-11, EDF47B or EDF47-12, EDF51A or EDF51-11, and EDF51B or

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 21
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          EDF51-12. The notations "A" or "-11" refer to the nonaqueous phase, and
          the notations "B" or "-12" to the aqueous phase.
     •    No holding times were specified for high concentration organic analysis.

     •    All VOC surrogate spikes were diluted out in sample EDF51A and the VOC
          results for this sample are considered estimated (J).  Surrogate spike recoveries
          were high for the pesticide surrogate for EDF50 (130 percent).  All detected
          pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for endosulfan II (all samples),
          2-butanone (EDF44, EDF46-50, and EDF51B), 3-nitroaniline  (EDF51A), and
          4-nitroaniline (EDF46, EDF47A, EDF47B, EDF48-50, and EDF51B) are
          considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for
          nondetected results for these compounds. Also because of calibration outliers,
          the detected results  for 2-methylnaphthalene (EDF46, EDF47A, EDF47B,
          EDF48-50, EDF51A, and EDF51B), and methylene chloride (EDF47, EDF48,
          and EDF51A) are considered estimated (J).

     •    There was poor agreement between values obtained using both columns for the
          PCB results for EDF47,  EDF48, EDF51A, and EDF51B and  the PCB results
          are considered estimated (J)  in these samples.

     •    Methylene chloride (2 to 7 jig/1) and chloroform (2 ng/1) were found in  the
          method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less  than 10 times the methylene chloride, or
          5 times the chloroform concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

GROUNDWATER—CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS

Fifty groundwater samples from monitoring wells  including six replicate sets and four field
blanks were analyzed by Industrial Corrosion Management  (ICM) for oil and grease, BOD,
COD, TOC, total phosphate, TDS,  sulfate, alkalinity, ammonia, nitrate plus nitrite, and
chloride (Case SAS 4733E, Sample  Nos. E01-E50) by low concentration  procedures.  The
data results are presented in Table  6. The data are qualified as follows:

     •    E03 was only analyzed for oil and grease.  Samples E19 and  E41 were  not
          analyzed for oil and grease, and E46 was not analyzed for COD or TOC
          because the bottles were incorrectly preserved.

     •    E36 for phosphate,  E48  for phosphate and  chloride,  and E49 for phosphate
          and chloride were reanalyzed as E36RE, E48RE, and E49RE because of poor

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 22
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          precision between replicates, but the holding times for sample analysis was
          exceeded and the values reported from reanalysis were not used.

     •    The laboratory deviated from the SAS specified method for chloride by
          exceeding the detection limits by a factor of 10 and changing the working range
          from 1 to 20 mg/1 to 5 to  200 mg/1. Quantitation limits may be higher than
          reported for this analyte for E10, E27, E28, and E43 and chloride results for
          these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    The CRL reviewer stated  that holding times were exceeded for  E41 for TOC
          and E30 and E31 for chloride, and the results considered estimated (J),
          although no analysis date was given on the laboratory sheets.

          Field duplicates for samples E35-36 (73 RPD), and E48-49 (55  RPD) for
          phosphate,  E30-E31  (15 RPD) and E48-49 (11.3 RPD) for chloride and  E46-47
          (44 RPD) for ammonia exceeded the specified SAS control limits of less than
          10 RPD. All chloride, phosphate and ammonia results are considered
          estimated (J) because of poor precision.

SURFACE WATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES

Nine surface water samples including two replicate sets  and one field blank were analyzed
by JTC for inorganic analytes (Case SAS 4208E, ITR Nos. MEAC21-28 and MEAC38) by
high concentration procedures.  The data has not yet been received (as of  March, 1990).

SURFACE WATER—ORGANIC ANALYSES

Nine surface water samples including two replicate sets  and one field blank were analyzed
by AATS for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs (Case  12495, OTR Nos. EDF21-28 and EDF38) by high concentration
procedures.  The data  results are presented in Table 7. The data are qualified as follows:

     •    No holding times were specified for high  concentration organic  analysis.

     •    Surrogate recoveries for the pesticide surrogate for EDF21 (125 percent),
          EDF25  (135 percent), and EDF38 (135 percent).  All detected  pesticide/PCB
          results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDF21 were outside the control limits for
          n-nitroso dipropylamine.  The unspiked sample was considered  estimated (J)
          for this compound.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 23
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for endosulfan II (all samples),
          2-butanone (all samples), and 4-nitroaniline (EDF22, EDF24, EDF27-28 and
          EDF38) are considered  estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R)
          for nondetected results for these compounds.  Also because of calibration
          outliers, the detected results for methylene chloride (EDF21, EDF23, EDF25,
          EDF28, and EDF38) and  2-methylnaphthalene  (EDF21-25, EDF27-28 and
          EDF38) are considered  estimated (J).

     •    There was poor agreement between pesticide values obtained using both
          columns and the pesticide results for EDF21, EDF23, EDF25, and EDF38 are
          considered estimated.

     •    Methylene chloride (2 to 7 mg/kg) and chloroform (2 mg/kg) were found in the
          method blanks.  Samples associated with these  blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the methylene chloride, or
          5 times the chloroform concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Methylene chloride (4 mg/kg) and chloroform (2.5 mg/kg) were found in the
          field blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the methylene chloride or
          5 times the chloroform concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

LEACHATE—INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Eight leachate samples from leachate wells including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by York Laboratories (YORK) for inorganic analytes (Case 12479, ITR
Nos. MEAC29-35, and MEAC37) by low concentration procedures.  The data results are
presented in Table 8. The data are qualified as follows:

     •    The spike sample recovery for mercury (129 percent) is above control limits.
          The data may be biased high and all results for mercury in these  samples are
          considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    Method duplicates were outside the control limits for mercury and the results
          for this analyte are considered estimated (J) because of poor precision.

     •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results for:  selenium (MEAC31-32,
          MEAC35, and MEAC37); and thallium  (MEAC29, MEAC31-32, MEAC34-35,
          and MEAC37) are considered estimated (J).

     •    Aluminum (117.2 jig/1), arsenic (0.8 to 1.2 yg/1), beryllium (0.3 jig/1), calcium
          (83.6 pg/1), lead (0.4 to 0.9 yg/1), sodium (523.1 yg/1), selenium (0.5 to 0.8 jig/1),

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 24
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          thallium (0.4 to 0.5 jig/1), vanadium (3.1 to 4.5 pg/1) and zinc (10.9 jig/1) were
          found in the calibration or preparation blanks.  Samples associated with these
          blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
          blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Aluminum (126 vg/1), calcium (272 pg/1), lead (2.7 yg/1), magnesium  (37.5 jig/1),
          nickel (5.2 jig/1), sodium (825 yg/1), thallium (12.1 yg/1), and zinc (12.1 yg/1)
          were found in the field blank.  Samples associated with this blank that contain
          these contaminants at concentrations less  than 5 times  the blank concentrations
          are considered unusable (flagged "B").

LEACHATE—ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Eight leachate samples from leachate  wells including one replicate set and one  field blank
were analyzed by Three Rivers Analytical (3RIVER) for volatile and  semi-volatile organic
compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and  pesticides/PCBs (Case  12479, OTR Nos. EDF29-35
and EDF37) by low concentration procedures.  One  trip blank was also analyzed for
volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group (EDF45). The data results are
presented in Table 8.  The data are qualified as follows:

          The VOC fraction  of sample EDF30 was reanalyzed as EBF30RE because of
          poor surrogate  recoveries.

     •    Surrogate recoveries were  above control limits for a VOC surrogate for  EDF30
          (123 percent) and EDF30RE (124 percent).  The data are biased high and all
          VOC results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J"). Since
          surrogate recoveries were not improved with sample reanalysis, use the results
          from the original analysis,  EDF30.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDF34 were outside the control limits for
          benzene, n-nitroso  dipropylamine, and 4-nitrophenol.  The unspiked sample was
          considered estimated (J) by the CRL reviewer for these compounds.

     •    The internal standard area counts were out of the control limits for two VOC
          internal standards for sample EDF34.  Compounds  associated with these
          standards in this sample are  considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EDF34-35, EDF37,
          and EDF45) are considered estimated (J) for all  detected results and unusable
          (R) for nondetected results for these compounds.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 25
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    Methylene chloride (5 to 11 yg/1) was found in the method blanks. Samples
          associated with this blank that contain this contaminant at concentrations less
          than 10 times  the blank concentration are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Acetone (10 jig/1) and methylene chloride (4 pg/l) were found in the field or
          trip blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Field duplicates for samples EDF29 and EDF32 were  out of control limits for
          toluene (25 RPD) and the results for this compound are considered estimated
          (J) in these samples.

SUBSURFACE  SOILS—INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Test Pits

Twenty soil samples from test pits including two replicate sets and one field blank were
analyzed by Keystone Environmental Resources (KEYTX) for inorganic analytes including
cyanide (Case 12070, ITR Nos. MEAA10, MEAA12-15, MEAA24-35,  and MEAA37-39) by
low concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 9.  The data are
qualified as follows:

     •    The  spike sample recovery for antimony (70.9 percent), manganese
          (46.6 percent), and lead (67.3 percent) are below control limits.  The data may
          be biased low and the quantitation limits may be higher than reported for these
          compounds. All detected results for these samples are considered estimated
          (flagged "J").

     •    The  post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results for selenium (MEAA10, MEAA15,
          MEAA25-28, MEAA30-32, MEAA37, and MEAA39) and thallium (MEAA15,
          MEAA25-26, MEAA32-33, MEAA14, and MEAA37) are considered estimated
          (J)-

     •    Manganese (0.660 mg/kg) was found in the preparation blank.  Samples
          associated with this blank that contain this contaminant at  concentrations less
          than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    The  method of standard addition correlation coefficient for arsenic on samples
          MEAA12, MEAA27, and MEAA29 and for lead on samples MEAA15,
          MEAA30-31, and MEAA33 were less than  0.995 and the results are considered
          estimated (J).

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 26
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
     •    Duplicate injection precision exceeded control limits for selenium in samples
          MEAA10, MEAA25-26, and MEAA37 and the results are considered estimated
          (J).

Twenty soil samples from test pits including one replicate set and one field blank were
analyzed by Laucks Testing Labs, Inc. (LAUCKS) for inorganic analytes including cyanide
(Case 11960,  ITR Nos. MEAAOO-09, MEAA11, MEAA16-23, and MEAA36) by low
concentration procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 9. The data  are
qualified as follows:

     •    The spike sample recovery for antimony (-84 percent), barium (-6.3 percent),
          copper  (22.7 percent) is below control limits.  The data may be biased low and
          the quantitation limits may be higher than reported for this compound.  All
          detected results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J") and
          all undetected results are considered  unusable (flagged "R").  The spike sample
          recovery for lead (1,220.6 percent) and selenium (35.5 percent) is out of control
          limits.  All results for these samples are considered estimated (J) for these
          analytes.

     •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects. The results for antimony (MEAA08 and
          MEAA22-23); selenium (MEAA06, MEAA16, and MEAA22); and thallium
          (MEAA02 and MEAA04-06) are considered estimated (J).

     •    Aluminum (8.8 mg/kg) and silver (1.7 mg/kg) were found in the preparation
          blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
          at concentrations less than 5  times the blank concentrations are considered
          unusable (flagged "B").

     •    The serial dilution results for barium (10.6 percent), manganese (10.1 percent),
          aluminum (10.4 percent), iron (11.3 percent), and zinc (12.4 percent)  indicate
          interference and the results for these elements are considered estimated (J).

     •    Method duplicates were out of  control limits for barium (115.5 RPD), copper
          (79.3 RPD), lead (47 RPD), iron (32.5  RPD), manganese (80.9 RPD), and zinc
          (82.4 RPD) and the results for  these analytes are considered estimated  (J).

Two soil samples from test pits were analyzed by JTC for inorganic analytes (Case
SAS 42081, ITR No. MEAA40-41) by high concentration procedures.  Sample MEAA40
was separated into a solid and a liquid fraction which are designated MEAA40S  and
MEAA40L, respectively.  The data results  are presented in Table 9. The data are
qualified as follows:

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 27
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
           There are no established holding times for high concentration samples.

           The data are reported on a weight wet basis for high concentration analysis.

           The method spike sample recovery for the solid phase for antimony
           (48 percent), calcium  (60 percent), cobalt (40 percent), and copper
           (67 percent); and for  the liquid phase for cobalt (21  percent), and copper
           (62 percent) is below  control  limits.  The data may be biased low and the
           quantitation limits may be higher than reported for these analytes. All results
           for these samples for  these analytes are considered estimated (flagged "J").
           Method spike sample  recoveries for the solid phase for silver (0 percent) and
           zinc (2 percent), and for the liquid phase for silver (0 percent)  are out of
           control limits. The data may be biased low and the  quantitation limits may be
           higher than reported for this analyte.  All detected results for these samples
           are considered estimated (J) and all undetected results are considered unusable
           (flagged "R"). The method spike sample recovery for the solid phase for
           aluminum (225 percent), sodium (724 percent), and magnesium (132 percent)
           and for the liquid phase for sodium (792 percent) exceeded control limits. The
           data may be  biased high and  the detected results for these samples for
           aluminum and magnesium are considered estimated (J).  The method spike
           concentration added for sodium for both the solid and liquid phases is below
           the instrument detection limit, therefore no statement can be made regarding
           the accuracy  of spike  recovery for sodium.

           The analysis spike sample recovery for the solid phase for aluminum
           (72 percent), beryllium (60 percent),  chromium (72 percent), copper
           (60 percent), silver (40 percent), calcium (76 percent), magnesium (84 percent),
           and zinc (78  percent) and for the liquid phase for nickel (65 percent), zinc
           (70 percent), and lead (80 percent) are below control limits.  The data may be
           biased  low and the quantitation limits may be  higher than reported for these
           analytes. All results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").

           The laboratory control sample for aluminum and antimony was outside the
           control limits for both the liquid and the solid phase samples.  The results for
           these analytes in  these samples are considered estimated (J).

           Cadmium (1.6 mg/kg), calcium  (624 mg/kg), and silver (5.2 mg/kg) were found
           in the liquid  phase preparation blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks
           that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
           concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 28
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    Method duplicates were out of control limits for calcium (55 RPD) and sodium
          (200 RPD) for the solid phase samples and the results for these analytes are
          considered estimated (J).

     •    Standards for sodium and silver in both the liquid and solid phases exceeded
          control limits and the results for these analytes are considered estimated (J).

SUBSURFACE SOILS—ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Soil Borings

Five soil samples from soil borings including one field blank were analyzed by COMPU for
volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12010, OTR Nos. EAG68-72) by low and medium concentration procedures.  The
data results are presented in Table 10. The data are qualified as follows:

     •    The VOC fraction of samples EAG68 and EAG69 were diluted and reanalyzed
          as EAG68RE and EAG69DL.  The VOC fraction of EAG72 was reanalyzed as
          a medium level sample EAG72RE.

     •    Holding times were exceeded for the VOC fraction analysis for EAG72RE.
          Aromatic compounds in these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    Benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzo[k]fluoranthene were coeluting in  sample
          EAG71 and could not be positively identified, therefore the results for these
          two compounds are identified as one group and are  considered estimated (J).

     •    All surrogate compounds were diluted out for the VOC fraction for EAG69,
          EAG69DL, and EAG71 and the detected results are considered estimated (J)
          and the nondetected results are considered unusable (R). Surrogate recoveries
          were below control limits for the pesticide/PCB surrogate for EAG72
          (0 percent). The data are biased low, the quantitation limits may be elevated,
          and all pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered estimated (J) for
          detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAG69DL were  outside the control limits
          for toluene, 1,1-dichloroethene, benzene,  and trichloroethene  and  for sample
          EAG68 outside the control limits for phenol. Matrix spike duplicates were
          outside the control limits for EAG68RE for  toluene  and for EAG69DL for
          trichloroethene, benzene, and toluene.  The  unspiked samples were considered
          estimated (J) for these compounds by the CRL reviewer.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 29
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
     •    Ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG68; xylene in EAG69; and
          2-butanone, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG72 exceeded the linear
          range of the instrument and the results for these compounds in these samples
          are considered estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted samples,
          EAG68RE and EAG69DL, for these compounds, and all the results of
          EAG72RE which was rerun as a medium concentration sample.  Xylene in
          EAG68RE and EAG72RE exceeded the linear  range of the instrument and the
          results for this compound are considered estimated (J).

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for 2-butanone (EAG68-69,
          EAG68RE, EAG69DL, and EAG71), acetone (EAG68, EAG68RE, EAG70,
          and EAG72), 4-methyl-2-pentanone (EAG68 and EAG72) methylene chloride
          (EAG68RE and EAG70), 4-nitrophenol (EAG68-72), di-n-butylphthalate
          (EAG68-72), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (EAG68-72) are considered
          estimated  (J).

     •    Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (13 to 2,000 pg/kg) and methylene
          chloride (7 to 2,500 pg/kg), were found in the method blanks. Chloroform
          (1 to  140 jig/kg) and xylene (130 vg/kg) were also found in the method blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant, or
          5 times the other blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Eight soil samples from soil borings including one field blank were analyzed by ENCOT
for volatile and semi-volatile organic  compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12090, OTR Nos. EAG63-65, EDA16-17, and EDA19-21)  by low and medium
concentration procedures. The data  results are presented in Table 10. The  data are
qualified as follows:

          The VOC fraction  of sample EDA17, and the SVOC and pesticide/PCB
          fractions of sample EDA19 were diluted and reanalyzed as EDA17DL and
          EAG19DL.

     •    Toluene in EDA17 and several SVOC tentatively identified compounds in
          EDA19 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results for these
          compounds in these samples and are considered estimated (J). Use the results
          from  the diluted samples, EDA17DL and EDA19DL,  for these compounds.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for samples EAG64 and EAG63 were outside the
          control limits for 4,4-DDT.  Matrix spike duplicates were outside  the control
          limits for EAG64 for 4,4-DDT. The unspiked samples were  considered
          estimated  (J) for these compounds by the CRL reviewer.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO.  10
Page 30
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for acetone (EAG63,
          EDA16, EDA19DL, and EAG64), methylene chloride (EAG63), and
          2-butanone (EAG64, EDA16-17, EDA19-21, and EDA19DL), are considered
          estimated (J).

     •    Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (3 to 1,600 jig/kg), methylene
          chloride (2 to 15500 ug/kg). di-n-butylphthalate (140 to 330 jig/kg), butyl benzyl
          phthalate (69 to 93 yg/kg), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (530 to 720 wg/kg)
          were found in the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that
          contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 10  times the  common
          laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged
          "B").

Three soil samples from soil borings including one replicate set were  analyzed by Acurex
Corporation (ACUREX) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs  (Case  12203, OTR Nos. EDA92-93 and EDA98) by low
concentration procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 10.  The data are
qualified as follows:

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA92 were outside the control limits for
          toluene, and 1,1-dichloroethene.  The unspiked samples were considered
          estimated (J) for these compounds by  the CRL reviewer.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for 4,4-DDT, methylene
          chloride, and acetone (all samples) are considered estimated (J). Also because
          of calibration outliers, the detected results for 2-butanone  (all samples) are
          considered  estimated (J) and the nondetected results  are considered unusable
          (R).

     •    The common laboratory contaminant, acetone (36 ug/kg),  was found in the
          method blank.  Samples associated with this blank that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times  the common laboratory
          contaminant blank concentrations  are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Aroclor 1254 in sample EDA98 was labeled by the laboratory with an "X," but
          the meaning of this qualifier is unknown.  The results should be used  with
          caution pending clarification from the laboratory, and is flagged  "J" and
          considered estimated.

Nineteen soil samples  from soil  borings including  one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by IT Corporation (IT) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs  and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12160, OTR  Nos. EAG66-67, EAG73,

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 31
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
EDA24-36, EDA96-97, and EDA99) by low and medium concentration procedures.
data results are presented in Table 10.  The data are qualified as follows:
                     The
     •    Holding times were exceeded for the VOC fraction analysis for EAG73 and
          EDA32. Aromatic compounds in these samples are considered estimated
          (flagged "J").

     •    Xylene exceed the linear range of the instrument in samples EDA34 and
          EDA36, but the samples were not diluted  and reanalyzed.  The results for
          xylene in these samples should be considered estimated (J).

     •    Two surrogate compounds were diluted out for the SVOC  fraction for EDA33
          and one SVOC surrogate compound exceeded the control limits in the same
          sample. The SVOC results for sample EDA33 are considered estimated (J).
          Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for the pesticide/PCB surrogate
          for EDA33 (232 percent) and EDA34 (181 percent). The  data are biased  high
          and all pesticide/PCB results for these samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike  recoveries for sample EDA31 were outside the control limits for
          toluene and for sample EDA33 outside the limits for endrin.  Matrix spike
          duplicates were outside the control limits for EDA32 for toluene and
          1,1-dichloroethene, and for EDA25 for 1,4-dichlorobenzene,
          1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol and acenaphthalene.  The
          unspiked samples were considered estimated (J) for these compounds by the
          CRL reviewer.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for acetone (EDA28,
          EDA30-31, EDA34-35 and EAG67) and 2-methylnaphthalene (EDA33) are
          considered estimated (J).  Also because of calibration outliers, the detected
          results for  4-chloraniline and 3-nitroaniline (EAG66-67,  EAG73, and
          EDA24-25) are considered estimated (J) and the nondetected results are
          considered unusable  (R).

     •    Common laboratory  contaminants, acetone (1 to 500 vg/kg), toluene (1 vg/kg),
          and methylene chloride (3 to 1,500 jig/kg)  were found in the method blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that  contain  these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

One soil sample from a  soil boring was analyzed by ECOVA for volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) (Case 12388, OTR No. EDA42) by low
concentration procedures. The  data results are  presented in Table 10. The data are
qualified as follows:

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                   AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 32
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
          The VOC fraction of sample EDA42 was diluted and reanalyzed as EDA42RE.

     •    Toluene in EDA42 exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the result
          for this compound in this sample is considered estimated (J).  Use the results
          from the diluted sample EDA42RE for this compound.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA42RE were outside the control limits
          for toluene and matrix spike duplicates were outside the control limits for the
          same sample for toluene. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J)
          for this compound by the CRL reviewer.

     •    Benzole acid (60 jig/kg) was found in the method blank.  Samples associated
          with this blank that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
          5 times the benzoic acid concentration are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Five soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by Gulf South Environmental Labs
(GULF) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 12324, OTR Nos. EDA37, EDA41, EDA91,  and EDA94-95) by low
concentration procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 10.  The data are
qualified as follows:

     •    The VOC fraction of sample EDA94 was reanalyzed because of low internal
          standard recoveries as EDA94RE.  The internal standard recoveries were
          satisfactory for EDA94RE, therefore use the results  from this  analysis.

     •    A pesticide internal standard was outside the control limits for EDA41 and the
          pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered  estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA91 were outside the control limits for
          toluene, and for sample EDA94 outside the limits for phenol,
          2,4-dinitrotoluene, gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and
          4,4-DDT. Matrix spike duplicates were outside the control limits for EDA91
          for toluene and for EDA94 outside the control limits for heptachlor.  The
          unspiked samples were considered estimated (J) for  these compounds by the
          CRL reviewer.

     •    Because  of calibration outliers, the detected results for methylene chloride (all
          samples), acetone (all samples), and 2-butanone (EDA37, EDA41, and EDA94)
          are considered estimated (J).  Also because of calibration outliers, the results
          for 2-butanone  (EDA95) are considered estimated (J) for all  detected results
          and unusable (R) for nondetected results.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 33
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (6 to 19 yg/kg), methylene chloride
          (1 to 9 yg/kg), and 2-butanone (14 yg/kg) were found in the method  blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Four soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by GULF for volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12322, OTR Nos.
EDA88-90 and EDA38) by low and medium concentration procedures. The data results
are presented in Table 10.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction and pesticide/PCB fraction
          extractions for EDA88.  The SVOC and pesticide/PCB results  for this sample
          are considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for the pesticide/PCB  surrogate
          for EDA38 (181 percent), EDA88 (194 percent),  EDA89 (180 percent), and
          EDA89 (216 percent).  The data are biased high  and all pesticide/PCB results
          for these samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA88 were outside the control limits for
          toluene, and for sample EDA89 outside the control limits for 2,4-dinitrotoulene,
          phenol, gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4-DDT. The
          unspiked samples were considered estimated  (J) for these compounds by  the
          CRL reviewer.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for all pesticides (all
          samples),  acetone (EDA88, EDA90, and EDA38), 2-butanone  (EDA88 and
          EDA90), and methylene  chloride (EDA88, EDA38, and EDA90), are
          considered estimated (J).  Also  because of calibration outliers, the results for
          2-butanone (EDA89 and EDA38) are considered estimated (J) for all detected
          results and unusable for all nondetected results (R).

     •    Common  laboratory contaminants, acetone (6 to 13 yg/kg), methylene chloride
          (1 to 2,800 yg/kg), and 2-butanone (14 yg/kg) were found in the method blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Three  soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by MetaTRACE, Inc.  (META) for
volatile and  semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12037, OTR Nos. EDA14-15 and EDA18) by low and medium concentration

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 34
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
                                           AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
procedures.
follows:
The data results are presented in Table 10.  The data are qualified as
          The SVOC fractions of EDA14, EDA14RE, EDA15, EDA15RE, and EDA18
          were reanalyzed because of low internal standard recoveries as EDA14RE,
          EDA14DLRE, EDA15RE, EDA15DL, and  EDA18RE.  The VOC fraction of
          sample EDA15, the SVOC fraction of EDA15RE, the  SVOC fraction of
          EDA14RE and the pesticide/PCB fraction of EDA15 were diluted and
          reanalyzed as EDA15DL, EDA15DL, EDA14DLRE, and EDA15DLRE.

          Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction analysis for EDA14DLRE
          and EDA15DL and for the pesticide/PCB fraction analysis of EDA15DLRE.
          All SVOC fractions for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").
          All pesticide/PCB results for EDA15DLRE are considered unusable (R) for
          nondetected  results and estimated (J) for detected results.

          GC/MS tuning requirements, specifically the retention time marker, are out of
          control limits for the pesticide/PCB marker, for EDA14.  All pesticide/PCB
          results  for this sample are considered unusable (R).

          Naphthalene and 2-methynapthalene in EDA14 and  EDA14RE, naphthalene,
          xylene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, Aroclor-1248, Aroclor-1254 in EDA15, and
          2-methylnapthalene, naphthalene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in EDA15RE
          exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results for these
          compounds in these samples are considered estimated  (J).

          The surrogate recovery of the pesticide blank (181 and 0 percent) associated
          with samples EDA14, EDA15DLRE, and  EDA18; EDA14 (238 percent);  and
          EDA15D1RE (0 percent) were out of control limits  and the results are
          considered estimated (J) for EDA14.  The results are considered estimated (J)
          for detected  results, and unusable (R) for nondetected results for EDA15DLRE
          and EDA18.  A surrogate recovery was out  of control  limits for the VOC
          fraction of EDA15 (78 percent) and EDA15DL (69  percent), but they were
          within the control limit for reanalyses of this sample, and  therefore, the CRL
          reviewer did not qualify the data based on the surrogate results for sample
          EDA15.

          Matrix spike recoveries for sample EDA15 were outside the control limits for
          chlorobenzene; and for EDA15RE for 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene and
          4-chloro-3-methylphenol.  Matrix spike duplicates were outside the  control limits
          for EDA15 for pentachlorophenol.  The matrix spike recoveries for the diluted
          sample EDA15DL were within control limits; therefore, the CRL reviewer did
          not qualify the unspiked sample based on these results. Matrix spike recoveries

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 35
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Test Pits
          for sample EDA15DLRE were below control limits (0 percent) for gamma-
          BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4-DDT.  The results in the
          unspiked sample are considered estimated (J) for detected results and unusable
          (R) for all nondetected results by the CRL reviewer.

          One or more SVOC internal standards were out of control limits for samples
          EDA14, EDA14RE, EDA15RE, EDA15, EDA18, and EDA18RE.  Compounds
          associated with these internal standards for these samples are considered
          estimated (J).  One VOC internal standard recovery was outside  control limits
          for EDA18 and EDA18RE.  Compounds associated with this standard in this
          sample are considered estimated (flagged "J").  Results  for SVOC internal
          standards were satisfactory for EDA14DLRE and EDA15DL, use the SVOC
          results from these two analyses.

          Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (2,200 jig/kg), and methylene
          chloride (2,300 jig/kg) were found in the method blanks.  Samples associated
          with these  blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
          10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").

          Because of calibration outliers, the  detected results for all  pesticides (all
          samples),  and  4-nitrophenol (EDA14-15, and EDA18), are considered estimated
          (J).

          Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (25 vg/kg), toluene (2 pg/kg),
          methylene  chloride  (8 to 80 yg/kg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (82 jig/kg), and
          di-n-butylphthalate (110 pg/kg) were found in the field blanks.  Chloroform
          (2 pg/kg) was  also found in the field blanks.  Samples associated  with these
          blanks (all soil boring sample groups listed above) which contain  these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory
          contaminant blank concentrations, or less than 5 times the chloroform
          concentrations are considered unusable  (flagged "B").
Twenty soil samples from test pits including two replicate sets and one field blank were
analyzed by PEI Associates, Inc. (PEI) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12010, OTR Nos. EDAOO-09, EDA11-13,
EAG84, EAG86-89, and EAG98-99) by low and medium concentration procedures.  The
data results are presented in Table 9.  The data are qualified as follows:

          The VOC fraction of samples EAG86, EAG98, EAG99 and EDA04 were
          diluted and  reanalyzed as EAG86DL, EAG98DL, EAG99DL, and EDA04DL.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 36
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          The VOC fraction of EDA06 was reanalyzed as EDA06RE because of poor
          surrogate recovery.

          Toluene in EDA04; ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG98 and  EAG99;
          1,2-dichloroethene in EAG99; and ethylbenzene in EAG86 exceeded the linear
          range of the instrument and the result for these compounds in these samples
          are considered estimated (J). Use the results from the diluted samples,
          EAG86DL,  EAG98DL, EAG99DL and EDA04DL for these compounds.
          Trichloroethene in EDA02 exceeded the linear range  of the instrument, but  the
          sample was  not diluted and reanalyzed, and the results for this compound in
          this sample  are considered estimated (J).

          Holding times were exceeded for the VOC fraction analysis for EAG98,
          EAG86DL,  EAG87, EAG89, EDA11, EDA12, and EDA04DL.  Aromatic
          compounds  in these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").  Holding
          times were exceeded by more than 14 days for VOC fraction analysis for
          EAG88, EAG98DL, EAG99, and EAG99DL.  All VOC compounds are
          considered estimated (J) for all results and aromatic compounds are considered
          unusable (R) for  all nondetected results for these samples.  Holding times were
          exceeded for the  SVOC fractions extractions for EAG86 and  all SVOC results
          for these samples are considered estimated.  Holding  time to extraction for the
          SVOC fraction of EAG87 and EDA08 exceeded 14 days.  The SVOC results
          for these samples are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and
          unusable (R) for  nondetected results.

          Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for a VOC surrogate for EDA06
          (143  percent) and EDA06RE (138 percent) and for the pesticide/PCB
          surrogate for EDA04  (154 percent), EDA08  (194 percent), EDA03 (179
          percent), EAG89 (169 percent), and EAG84 (160  percent).  The data are
          biased high  and all VOC or pesticide/PCB results for  these samples are
          considered estimated  (flagged "J").  Surrogate recoveries were not improved
          with  the reanalysis of EDA06, and the original sample EDA06 should be used.

          Matrix  spike recoveries were outside the control limits for dieldrin and
          4,4'-DDT for EAG84 and for benzene and toluene for EDA04. Matrix spike
          duplicates for sample  EAG84 were outside the control limits  for benzene and
          for sample EDA04 for toluene, 1,1-dichloroethene, and benzene.  The unspiked
          sample was considered estimated by  the CRL reviewer for these compounds.

          Low  area counts  for one VOC  internal standard for sample EAG84 was noted.
          Compounds associated with this standard in this sample are considered
          estimated (flagged "J").

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 37
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EDAOO-03,
          EDAD06, EDA06RE, EDA08-09, EDA13, EAG84, EAG86-87, EAG86DL, and
          EAG98) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R)
          for nondetected results for these compounds. Also due to calibration outliers,
          the detected results for benzene (EDA03, EDA06, EDA08-09, EAG84,  and
          EAG86), methylene chloride (EDA12, EDA04-05, EDA07, and EDA04DL),
          acetone (EDA11-12, EAG89 and EDA04DL) and 2-methylnapthalene (EDA03,
          EAG87) are considered estimated (J).

     •    Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (2 jig/kg), acetone
          (1,000 jig/kg), di-n-butylphthalate (70 yg/kg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
          (75 jig/kg), and 2-butanone (3 to 240  ng/kg) were found in the method blanks.
          Chlorobenzene (2 to 450 ng/kg) and ethylbenzene (2 vg/kg) were also found in
          the method blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory
          contaminants, and 5 times the ethylbenzene  or chlorobenzene concentrations
          are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Twenty soil samples from test pits including one  replicate set and one field blank were
analyzed  by PEI for volatile and  semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs  (Case 11960, OTR Nos. EDA10, EAG74-83, EAG85, and EAG90-97) by
low and medium concentration procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 9.
The data are qualified as follows:

          The  VOC fraction of samples EAG75-77, EAG79-83, EAG85, EAG93,  and
          EAG97 and the SVOC fraction of sample EAG93 were diluted and reanalyzed
          as EAG75-77DL,  EAG79-83DL, EAG85DL, EAG93DL, and EAG97DL.  The
          VOC fraction of EAG80 was reanalyzed as EAG80RE because of poor
          surrogate recovery.

     •    Holding times were exceeded for the  VOC fraction analysis for EAG93DL,
          EAG97DL, and EDA91.  Aromatic compounds in these samples are considered
          estimated (flagged "J").  Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction
          extraction for EAG74, EAG83, and EAG77 and all SVOC compounds for these
          samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for more than one VOC
          surrogate for EAG80 (164 and 128 percent) and EAG80RE (128, 139, and 196
          percent).  The data are biased high and all  VOC results for these samples are
          considered estimated  (flagged "J"). Surrogate recoveries for the pesticide/PCB
          surrogate for samples EAG74-75, EAG79-80, EAG82-83, EAG93, and EAG97
          were above control limits but the CRL  Reviewer determined  that this was due
          to coelution with an unknown compound and the data was not qualified based

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 38
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          on these results.  Because surrogate recoveries were satisfactory for EAG80DL,
          but not EAG80 or EAG80RE, use the results from EAG80DL.

          Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAG78 were slightly outside the control
          limits for 1,1-dichloroethene, and for sample EAG91 slightly outside the control
          limits for 4,4-DDT.  Matrix  spike duplicates were slightly outside the control
          limits for EAG91 for 4,4-DDT.  The unspiked samples were not qualified by
          the CRL reviewer based on these results.

          Ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene in EAG76, EAG80, EAG82 and EAG80RE;
          1,2-dichloroethene, ethylbenzene, toluene,  trichloroethene, and xylene in
          EAG77; toluene and xylene in EAG79, EAG85,  and EAG81;
          1,2-dichloroethene, ethylbenzne,  toluene, and xylene in EAG75;
          4-methyl-2-pentanone, ethylbenzene, toluene, trichloroethene, and xylene  in
          EAG83; 4-methyl-2-pentanone, ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethene,  toluene,
          trichloroethene, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in EAG93; and xylene in EAG97
          exceeded the linear range of the instrument.  The result for these compounds
          in these samples are considered  estimated (J). Use the results from the  diluted
          samples, EAG75-77DL, EAG79-83DL, EAG85DL, EAG93DL, and EAG97DL
          for these compounds. Xylene in EAG93DL exceeded the linear range of the
          instrument but the sample was not diluted and reanalyzed and the result for
          this compound in this sample  is  considered estimated (J).

          Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for acetone  and 2-butanone
          (EAG74-83, EAG85, EAG90,  EAG92-97,  EDA10, EAG75-77, EAG85DL,
          EAG79-83DL, EAG80RE, EAG93DL, and EAG97DL), methylene chloride
          (EAG91), and 2-methylnaphthalene (EAG93DL) are considered estimated (J).

          Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (430  to 1,100 yg/1), toluene
          (280 yg/1), diethyl phthalate (420 to 29,000 yg/1), di-n-butylphthalate (56 to
          2,100 yg/1), bis(2-etylhexyl)phthalate (51 yg/1), and butylbenzyl phthalate
          (14 yg/1) were  found in the  method blanks.  Chlorobenzene (3 to 370 yg/1),
          phenol  (58 yg/1), and pyrene (2,000 yg/1)  were also found in the method
          blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
          at concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminants and
          5 times the other contaminant blank concentrations are considered unusable
          (flagged "B").

          Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (18 yg/kg), 2-butanone (2 yg/kg),
          methylene chloride (15 to 36 yg/kg), toluene (1 yg/kg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)
          phthalate (100 yg/kg), butylbenzyl phthalate (38 yg/kg), di-n-butylphthalate
          (100 yg/kg), diethyl phthalate  (280 yg/kg), and dimetylphthalate  (32 yg/kg) were
          found in the field blanks. Chlorobenzene  (4 to 6 yg/kg) and pyrene (38 yg/kg)

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                   AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 39
July 21, 1989
GL065561.DE.DV
          were also found in the field blanks. Samples associated with these blanks (all
          test pit sample groups listed above) that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant or
          5 times the other compound blank concentrations are considered unusable
          (flagged "B").

Two soil samples from test pits were analyzed by GULF for volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case SAS 43681, OTR Nos.
EDA22 and EDA23) by high concentration procedures.  The data results are presented in
Table 10. The data are qualified as follows:

          The VOC and SVOC fractions  of sample EDA23 were diluted  and reanalyzed
          as EDA23DL.

     •    No holding times are established for high concentration analysis.

     •    The results are reported on a wet weight basis for high concentration analysis

     •    4-Methyl-2-pentanone, ethylbenzene, toluene, trichlorethene, xylene, and
          butylbenzyl  phthalate in EDA23 exceeded the linear range of the instrument
          and the results for these compounds in this sample are considered estimated.
          Use the results from the diluted sample EDA23DL for these compounds.

     •    All surrogate compounds were diluted out for the VOC fraction for EDA22
          and EDA23DL and  the SVOC  fraction of EDA23DL.  The detected results for
          EDA22 are considered estimated (J) and the nondetected results are
          considered unusable (R).  Surrogate recoveries were within control limits for
          both the VOC and SVOC fractions of EDA23 therefore EDA23DL was  not
          qualified based on the surrogate recoveries.  Surrogate recoveries were outside
          the control  limits for the PCB surrogates for EDA22  (195 and 123 percent)
          and EDA23 (178 percent).  The data are biased high, and all PCB  results for
          these samples are considered estimated (J).

     •    Because of calibration outliers,  the detected results for acetone (EDA22,
          EDA23, and EDA23DL), methylene chloride (EDA22 and EDA23DL),
          Aroclor-1254 (all samples), and 1,2-dichloroethane (EDA23) are considered
          estimated (J).  Also because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone
          (EDA22, EDA23, and EDA23DL) and endosulfan I, endosulfan II,  endrin,
          endrin  ketone, heptachlor epoxide  (all samples) are  considered estimated for all
          detected results and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.

     •    Common laboratory contaminants,  acetone  (2 mg/kg),  and methylene chloride
          (2 to 4 mg/kg) were found in the  method blanks.   Samples associated with

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 40
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
          10 times the common laboratory contaminant blank concentrations are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").

SUBSURFACE  SOIL—OIL AND GREASE

Seventy-nine soil samples from soil borings and test pits including five duplicate sets and
five field blanks were analyzed by SKINER for oil and grease (Case SAS 4634E, Sample
groups E01-21; E42-53; E57-62; E78-79; E80-86; E54-56; E63-77; and E22-23 and E31-41)
by SAS procedures. The data results are  presented in Tables 9 and 10. The data are
qualified as follows:

     •    The  spike sample recovery was below control limits for sample groups E42-53
          (33.9 percent), El 1-21  (64 percent), E54-56 (71 percent), E63-77 (66.4 percent)
          and E22, E23, E31-41, E39 (4.1 percent).  The data may be biased low and the
          quantification  limits may be higher than reported for this analyte.  All results
          for these samples are considered estimated  (flagged "J").  The spike sample
          recovery was above control limits for sample group E01-10 (262 percent) and
          sample group  E57-62 (304 percent).  The data may be biased high and all
          results for these samples are considered estimated (flagged "J").  The
          frequency for  analysis of spike  samples as specified in the SAS request for
          sample group  E63-77 was not followed therefore  all oil and grease data are
          considered estimated (J) in this sample group.

     •    Method duplicates were out of control limits for sample groups E78-79
          (158 RPD), E42-53 (51.9 RPD),  E80-85 (50.7 RPD), E54-56 (36.1 RPD), and
          E22, E23, E31-41 (46 RPD) and the results for these samples are considered
          estimated.  The  frequency of analysis for duplicate samples as specified in the
          SAS request was not strictly followed for sample  group E63-77, therefore all oil
          and  grease data are considered estimated (J) in this sample group.

     •    The laboratory did not report the method  detection limit as specified in the
          SAS request.

     •    Oil and grease (53.4 to 109 mg/kg) were found in the method blanks.  Samples
          associated with these blanks which contain oil and grease at concentrations less
          than 5  times the blank concentrations are considered unusable  (flagged "B").

     •    Oil and grease (39.5 to 54 mg/kg) were found in  the test pit field blanks and
          oil and grease (14.9 to 210 mg/kg) were found  in  the soil boring field blank.
          Samples associated with these blanks (all soil boring and test pit sample groups
          listed above) which contain oil and grease  at concentrations less than 5 times
          the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 41
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
SUBSURFACE SOIL—DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSIS

Soil Borings

Twenty soil samples from soil borings including two field blanks were analyzed by AATS
for dioxins and furans (Case SAS 471 IE, Sample Nos. E01-20) by low concentration
procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 11. The data are qualified as
follows:

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for HexaCDD (E01-17) are
          considered estimated (J).

Test Pits

Nineteen soil samples from test pits including two replicate sets and one field blank were
analyzed by AATS for dioxins and furans (Case SAS 4636E, Sample Nos. E01-19) by low
concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 11.  The data are
qualified as follows:

          Samples E01, E05-13 and E15 were reanalyzed as E01RE, E05-13RE, and
          E15RE because surrogate recoveries were outside control limits.

     •    Surrogate recoveries were above control limits for the E13 (210 percent), E01
          (182 and 276 percent), E01RE (200 and 260 percent),  E05 (188 and 236
          percent), E05RE (230 and 320 percent), E06 (138 and 124 percent), E06RE
          (140 and 130 percent), E07 (176 percent), E07RE (130 percent), E09  (152 and
          204 percent), E09RE (140 and  136 percent), E10 (144 and 176 percent),
          E10RE (134 percent, Ell (236 and 200 percent), El IRE (154 and 146
          percent), E13 (210,  722, and 1370 percent), E13RE  (322 and 574 percent), E15
          (132 and 148 percent), E15RE (132 and 128 percent).  The data are biased
          high for all these  samples and the results are considered estimated (J).
          Because surrogate recoveries were not improved with reanalysis of samples
          E01, E05-07, E13, and E15, use the original  data analyses.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample E16 were outside the control limits for
          HeptaCDF and 2,3,7,8 TCDD.  Matrix spike duplicates were outside the
          control limits for the same sample for OCDF. The  unspiked samples  were
          considered estimated (J) for these compounds.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for HexaCDD (all samples),
          HeptaCDD (E03-07, Ell, E13, E15, E17, E18, E01RE, E02RE, E07RE,
          E09RE, E10RE, E11RE, E12RE, and E06RE), OCDD (E07, Ell, and E13),

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 42
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          HeptaCDF (E03-07, Ell, E13, E05RE, E13RE, E15RE, E06, E15, E17,
          E06RE, and E18), HexaCDF (E03, E04, E06, £05, E15, E17, and E18) are
          considered estimated (J).

SUBSURFACE SOIL—INCINERATION PARAMETERS

Soil Borings

Seven soil samples from soil borings were analyzed by Hoffman Laboratory (HOFF) for
incineration parameters including percent moisture, ash, volatile matter, fixed carbon and
heating value (Case SAS 4730E, Sample Nos. E01-07) by SAS procedures.  The data
results are presented  in Table 12.  No qualification of the data was necessary.

Test Pits

Seven soil samples from test pits including one replicate set were analyzed by Versar, Inc.
(VERSAR) for incineration parameters including percent moisture, ash, volatile matter ,
fixed carbon, and heating value (Case SAS 4634E, Sample  Nos. E24-30) by SAS
procedures.  The data results are presented in Table  12. The data are qualified as
follows:

     •    The method duplicates  exceed the control limits of +/- 50 BTU as specified in
          the SAS request but the relative percent difference is 0.9 percent, therefore the
          data were not qualified based on this result.

SEDIMENT—INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Twelve soil sediment  samples including one replicate  set were analyzed by ENSECO for
inorganic analytes (Case 12417, ITR Nos. MEAC04-05, and MEAC10-19) by low
concentration procedures.  The data  results are presented in Table  13.  The data are
qualified as follows:

      •    The spike sample recovery for arsenic (71.1 percent)  and silver (53.1 percent)
          are below control limits.  The data may be biased low and the  quantitation
          limits may be higher than reported for this compound.  The spike sample
          recovery for manganese (146.6 percent) is above control limits and the data
          may be biased high All results for these samples  are considered estimated
          (flagged "J").

      •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating  interference  effects and the results for selenium (all samples except
          MEAC05  and MEAC15); and thallium (all samples except MEAC17) are
          considered estimated (J).

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 43
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    Aluminum (7.9 mg/kg), cobalt (1.2 mg/kg), and zinc (1.5 mg/kg) were found in
          the preparation blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks which contain
          these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations
          are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    The serial dilution results (30.8 percent) for zinc indicate interference and the
          results for zinc are considered estimated (J).

     •    The method of standard addition correlation coefficient for selenium on sample
          MEAC15 was less than 0.995 and the results are considered estimated (J).

     •    Method duplicates were out of control limits for aluminum (49.6 RPD), arsenic
          (83.3 RPD), calcium (36.9 RPD), iron (50 RPD), and manganese (39,2 RPD)
          and the results for these metals are  considered estimated (J) due to poor
          precision.

Seven sediment samples including one replicate set were analyzed by JTC for inorganic
analytes (Case SAS 4208E, ITR Nos. MEACOO-03, MEAC06-07,  and MEAC09) by high
concentration procedures.  The data has not yet been received (as of March, 1990).

SEDIMENT—ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Twelve soil sediment samples including one replicate set were analyzed by COMPU for
volatile and semi-volatile  organic compounds  (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs
(Case 12417, OTR Nos. EDF04-05, and EDF10-19) by low concentration procedures.  The
data results are presented in Table 13.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Both decanted and undecanted percent moisture determinations were given for
          the SVOC and pesticide/PCB fractions of samples EDF05 and EDF12.

     •    Benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzo[k]fluoranthene in samples EEDF13-18 were
          coeluting and  could not be positively identified, therefore the results for these
          two compounds are identified as one group and flagged estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike duplicates were outside the control limits for EDF19 for
          pentachlorophenol.  The  unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) for this
          compound by  the CRL reviewer.

     •    Methylene chloride (8 to 16 yg/kg) and acetone (8 to 19 jig/kg) were found in
          the method blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the blank concentrations are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 44
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Seven soil sediment samples including one replicate set were analyzed by Aquatec, Inc.
(AQUAI) for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and
pesticides/PCBs (Case 12495, OTR Nos. EDFOO-03, EDF06-07, and EDF09) by high
concentration procedures.  The data  results are presented in Table 13.  The data are
qualified as follows:

     •    The VOC fraction of sample EDFOO was diluted and reanalyzed as EDFOODL.

     •    High concentration samples are reported on a wet weight basis.

     •    EDF03, EDF06, and EDF09 were screened as low/medium level samples and
          the VOC fraction was rerun by low/medium concentration analysis.  The SVOC
          and pesticide/PCB fractions of these three samples were also run as
          low/medium level  samples under another sample delivery group.

     •    VOC surrogates for sample EFDOO were diluted out but the undiluted sample
          surrogate recoveries were within control limits, therefore, the data was not
          qualified based on this result.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for 2-butanone (all samples)
          are considered estimated  (J).  Also because of calibration outliers, the results
          for acetone, pentachlorophenol, heptachlor epoxide, endrin, endosulfan II,
          endrin ketone (all samples) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results
          and unusable (R) for nondetected results for these compounds.

     •    Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (1 to 22 mg/kg), methylene chloride
          (1 to 9 mg/kg), and 2-butanone (16 to 23 mg/kg), were found in the method
          blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
          at concentrations less than 10 times  blank concentrations are considered
          unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Aroclor results in samples EDF01 and EDF07 are considered estimated
          because the lower value from two analyses is given and the difference between
          the two results relative to the lower value is greater than 25 percent.

     •    Xylene in EDFOO exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results
          for this compound in this sample are considered estimated (J).  Use the results
          from the diluted sample EDFOO for  this compound.

Three soil sediment samples  were analyzed by Aquatec, Inc. (AQUAI) for volatile and
semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12495,

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10                  AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Page 45
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
OTR Nos. EDF03, EDF06, and EDF09) by low concentration procedures. The data
results  are presented in Table 13. The data are qualified as follows:

     •    These samples are originally from the sample delivery group above, as
          previously noted. These  samples are labeled EDF03L, EDF06L, and EDF09L
          to distinguish them from  the previous high concentration VOC analysis.

     •    Holding times were exceeded for VOC fraction analysis and SVOC and
          pesticide/PCB fractions extractions and all results are considered estimated (J).

     •    Matrix spike  duplicates for sample EDF09 were outside the control limits for
          phenol, 2-chlorophenol, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, n-nitrosodiphenylamine,
          1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, acenapthalene, 4-nitrophenol,
          2,4-dintrotoluene, pentachlorophenol, pyrene, gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin,
          dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4-DDT.  Matrix spike recoveries were outside the  control
          limits for n-nitrosdiphenylamine and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene for sample EDF09.
          The unspiked sample results were considered estimated (J) for these
          compounds by the CRL reviewer.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the results for acetone, 2-butanone (all samples)
          and trans-1,3-dichlorpropane (EDF06) are considered estimated (J) for all
          detected results and  unusable (R) for nondetected results for these compounds.

     •    The common  laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (3 to 5 jig/kg) was
          found in the  method blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain
          this contaminant at concentrations less than 10 times blank concentrations are
          considered unusable  (flagged "B").

     •    Aroclor 1254 in sample EDF09 and EDF06, they are considered estimated (J)
          because the reported result is below the specified reporting dilution analysis.

AMBIENT AIR

EVENT 1

Seventy ambient air carbon molecular sieve tube samples including 10 replicate sets, five
field blanks  and five trip blanks were analyzed  by Environmental Science and
Engineering/Hunter Environmental Services, Inc. (ESECO) for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) (Case SAS 4632E, Sample Nos. E15-28, E43-70, E99-112, and E127-140) by EPA
Method T02.  The data  results are presented in Table 14.  The  data are  qualified as
follows:

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 46
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          Data results from sample E52 were missing from the data package.
          explanation from the laboratory was given.
                 No
          Sample E48 was reanalyzed as E48RE.  No explanation from the laboratory
          was given.  Use the results from the original sample, E48.

          The surrogate recoveries of all of the samples (16 to 50 percent and 150 to
          1826 percent) except E25, E27, E43, E45, E49, E51, E106, E128, E129,E134,
          E136, and E138 were outside control limits.  All VOC results for the samples
          except those  previously listed are considered estimated.  Samples E48, E48RE,
          and E99 had one  or more surrogate recovery at 0 percent.  All VOC results
          for these samples are considered estimated (J) for  all detected results and
          unusable (R) for all nondetected results.

          Matrix spike  recoveries for E25 for 1,1-dichloroethene and chlorobenzene; for
          E65 for trichloroethene, benzene, toluene, chlorobenzene; for E133 or
          1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, benzene, and chlorobenzene  were outside
          the control limits.  Matrix spike  duplicates were out of control limits for E25
          for 1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, toluene, and chlorobenzene; for E65 for
          1,1-dichloroethene, toluene,  and  chlorobenzene; and for E133 for
          1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, benzene, toluene, and chlorobenzene.  The
          results in the unspiked samples are considered estimated (J) for by the CRL
          reviewer for these compounds.

          Because of calibration outliers, the positive results for chloromethane,
          methylene chloride, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and benzene (E43-56,
          E48RE, E15-28, E57-58, and E61);   acetone (E16-48, E57-58, and E61); carbon
          tetrachloride  (E16-28, E57-58, E61); 1,1,2-trichoroethane and tetrachoroethene
          (E43-48, E48RE, E16-28, E57-58, and E61); toluene and xylene  (E49-58,
          E15-28, E57-58, and E61);  chloromethane, methylene chloride, benzene, and
          xylene (E62-70, E59-60, E99-112, and E127-135); chloromethane, benzene, and
          methylene chloride (E136-140); carbon tetrachloride and trichloroethene
          (E62-70, E59-60, E99-103, and E127-135); toluene (E62-70, E59-60,  E99-104,
          and E112); ethylbenzene (E127-135); and styrene (E62-66, E69-70, and
          E104-112)  are considered  estimated (J).  Also because of calibration outliers,
          the results for carbon tetrachloride (E43-56, E48RE, E49-56, E15, and
          E104-112); 1,1,2-trichoroethane and tetrachlorethene (E49-56, and E15),
           1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (E43-70, E48RE, E15, E16-23, E24-28,  E99-112, and
          E127-135, E136-140), ethylbenzene (E62-70, E59-60, E99-103, and E104-112),
          and styrene (E67-68, E59-60, E99-103) are considered estimated (J) for all
          detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected  results for this compounds.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 47
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
      •     Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (36 to 220 ng/tube), methylene
           chloride (43 to 490 ng/tube), and toluene  (26 to 180 ng/tube) were found in the
           method blanks.  Chloromethane (11 to 430 ng/tube), 1,1,2-trichloroethane (25
           to 59 ng/tube), 1,1-dichloroethene (50 ng/tube), trichlorethene (24 to
           78 ng/tube), tetrachloroethene (30 to 270  ng/tube), benzene (33 to
           220  ng/tube), chlorobenzene (53 to 200 ng/tube), styrene (47 to 170 ng/tube),
           ethylbenzene (38 to 75 ng/tube),  and xylene (42 to 240 ng/tube) were also
           found in the method blanks.  Samples  associated with these blanks that contain
           the  common laboratory  contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times, or
           less  than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged
           "B").

      •     One or more internal standard was out of control limits for samples E18, E20,
           E21, E23, E24, E28,  E43, E44, E47, E48, E48RE, E49,  E50, E55, E57, E58,
           E60-68, E70, E99, E101-107, E109-111, E127-136, E138, and E140, and the
           results  for compounds associated with these standards, are  all considered
           estimated (J) for these samples.

      •     Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (4.5 jig/m3),  toluene (2.4 to
           27 jig/m3), methylene chloride (4 to 39 jig/m3) were found  in the field or trip
           blanks.  Benzene (1.2 to 2.3 jig/m3), chlorobenzene (2.6 to  8.5 ]ig/m3)
           chloromethane (2.1 to 115 pg/'mS), ethylbenzene (1.6 to  46  jig/m3), styrene
           (1.3 to 55 jig/m3), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (55 vg/m3), and xylene (1.6 to
           105  ]ig/m3) were also found in the field or trip blanks.  Samples associated with
           these blanks which contain the common laboratory  contaminants at
           concentrations less than 10 times or less than  5 times the blank concentrations
           are  considered unusable (flagged "B").

      •     Samples with breakthrough between front and back MCS tubes are considered
           estimated for those compounds (flagged "J") (Table 10-4).

      •     Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits  are listed  in  Table 10-5 and the
           results  are considered estimated (J).

Seventy ambient air tenax tube samples including  ten replicate sets, and five field and five
trip blanks were analyzed by PEI for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Case
SAS 4632E, Sample Nos. E01-14, -42, E71-98, and El 13-126) by EPA Method T01. The
data results are presented in Table 15.  The data are qualified as follows:

      •     Samples Ell, E12, E71, E72, El 19 and E120  were  sent in  to be analyzed as
           MS/MSD samples but the  laboratory did not use them for  that purpose.  They
           are  considered replicate samples and labeled Ell A and El IB, etc.   The tube
           for  E85 was broken and thus not analyzed.

-------
                                                    TABLE 10-4
                                                  C 4 H LANDFILL
                                  SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
                                                   CMS--EVENT 1


Samples                       E15.E16   E17.E1B   E43.E44   E65.E66   E135.E136  E137.E138

Chemical
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE                       X         X
BENZENE                                                               X          X
CARBON DISULFIDE                                  X
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE                  X                                       X
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE                                                     X
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)                X                             X

-------
                                                               TABLE  10-5
                                                             C & H LANDFILL
                                                  SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL LIMITS
                                                              CMS--EVENT 1
samples

Cliemi cal
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROBEN2ENE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E21.E23   E22.E24   E45.E47   E46.E48   E61.E63   E99.E100  E135.E137 E136.E138

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 48
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          Because of calibration outliers, the positive results for acetone (E89-98,
          E113-118, E119A, E119B, E120A, E120B, E121-126), 4-methyl-2-pentanone
          (E12A, E12B, E14, E29-37, E01-10, E11A, E111B, E13), 2-butanone (E01-10,
          E11A, E11B, E13, E12A, E12B, E14, E29-37, E115-118, E119A, E119B,
          E120A, E120B, E121-126) are considered estimated (J).  Also because of
          calibration outliers,  the results for 2-butanone (E76-84, E86-88, E89-98, El 13,
          El 14) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R)
          for nondetected results for this compound.

          Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (17 to 44 ng/tube), methylene
          chloride (11 to 19 ng/tube), 2-butanone (24 to 55 ng/tube) were found in the
          method blanks.  Chlorobenzene (8 ng/tube), ethylbenzene (4 ng/tube), styrene
          (3 to 7 ng/tube),  and xylene (3 to 8 ng/tube) were also found in the method
          blanks.  Samples  associated with these blanks which contain the common
          laboratory  contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times or the other
          contaminants at concentrations less than  5 times the blank  concentrations are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").

          GC/MS tuning time  limit was exceeded for sample E126 and  the results are
          considered estimated (J).

          Several compounds exceeded the linear range of the instrument in several
          samples, but reanalysis of these samples were not possible because of the
          nature of the media. The results for these compounds in the  samples are
          considered estimated (J).

          Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (1.1 to 3 pg/m3), toluene (0.1 to
           1 iig/m3), 2-butanone (0.9 to 3.1 yg/m3),  methylene chloride (0.4 to 1.3 ]ig/m3)
          were found  in the field or trip blanks. Benzene (0.2 pg/m3),  carbon disulfide
          (0.2 pg/m3), chlorobenzene (0.4 yg/m3), ethylbenzene  (0.2 to 0.3 jig/m3),
           1,1,1-trichloroethane (0.8 to  5.5 iig/m3), and xylene (0.1  to  1.2 yg/m3) were also
          found in the field or trip blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks which
          contain the  common laboratory contaminants at concentrations less than
           10 times or the other contaminants  at concentrations less than 5 times the
          blank concentrations are considered  unusable (flagged "B").

          Samples with breakthrough between  front and back TENAX  tubes are
          considered estimated for those compounds (flagged "J")  (Table 10-6).

          Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits are listed in Table 10-7 and
          results are considered estimated (J).

-------
                                                                                                                                                     page 1  of  2
                                                                  TABLE 10-6
                                                                 C & H LANDFILL
                                                  SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
                                                                 TENAX--EVENT 1
Samples

Chemical
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE
BENZENE
BROMOMETHANE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E03.E04   E05.E06   E07.EOB   E09.E10   E11A.E12A E11B.E12B E29.E30   E37.E38   E71A.E72A E71B.E72B E73.E74   E75.E76   E77.E78

-------
                                                                                                                                                     page 2  of  2
                                              TABLE 10-6
                                             C 8 H LANDFILL
                              SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
                                             TENAX--EVENT 1


Samples                       E79.E80   E81.E82   E87.E88   E89.E90   E91,E92   E95.E96   E119A.E120

Chemical
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE                                        X
BENZENE                       X
BROMOMETHANE
CARBON DISULFIDE              X
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE                 X         X
CHLOROMETHANE                                                                             X
ETHYL BENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE            XX                   XXX
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

-------
                                                                  TABLE  10-7
                                                                C * H  LANDFILL
                                                      SAMPLES  EXCEEDING  RPD CONTROL LIMITS
                                                                TENAX--EVENT  1
                                                                                                                                                      page 1 of 2
samples

chemical
1.1.1 -TRICHLOROE THANE
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIOE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROME THANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TR I CHLOROE THENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E07.E09
            E08.E10
                        E11A.E11B   EUA.E12B   E31.E33
                                                            E32.E34
                                                                        E71A.E71B   E72A.E72B   E75.E77
                                                                                                            E76.E78     E66.E68

-------
                                                                                                                                                      page 2 ol 2
                                                                                           TABLE  10-7
                                                                                        C  « H  LANDFILL
                                                                               SAMPLES  EXCEEDING  RPD CONTROL LIMITS
                                                                                        TENAX--EVENT  1
Samples                        E119A.E119B  E120A.E120B  E121.E123    E122.E124

chemical
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE                        X
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE                  X                        X
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROME THANE                  X
ETHYLBENZENE                               X
METHYLENE CHLORIDE             XX                        X
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE                        X
TRICHLOROETHENE                X
XYLENE (TOTAL)

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 49
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Ten ambient air polyurethane foam samples including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by PEI for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and pesticides/PCBs
(Case SAS 4633E, Sample Nos. E01-10) by EPA Method T010.  The data results are
presented in Table 16. The data are qualified as follows:

     •     The surrogate recovery  of the pesticide surrogate was below control limits (0
           percent) for E06.  All pesticide results for this sample is considered estimated
           (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.

     •     Matrix spike recoveries  for all samples were outside the control limits for all
           SVOC compounds (32 to 74 percent) , aldrin (33 percent), dieldrin (44
           percent), endrin (22 percent) 4,4-DDT (135 percent), 2,4-dinitrophenol (0
           percent), alpha-BHC (0 percent), beta-BHC (0 percent), gamma BHC (0
           percent), and endosulfan sulfate (0 percent). The results in the all sample are
           considered estimated (J) for these compounds by the CRL reviewer.

     •     Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for all pesticides (all
           samples) are considered estimated  (J).

     •     A common laboratory contaminant, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (2 ng/tube) was
           found in the method blanks.  Phenol (2  ng/tube) was also found in the method
           blank.  Samples associated with these blanks which contain the common
           laboratory  contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times or  the other
           contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are
           considered unusable (flagged "B").

EVENT 2

Seventy ambient air carbon molecular sieve and 70 tenax tube samples including
20 replicate sets, 10 field blanks, and 10 trip blanks were analyzed by ESECO for volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) (Case  No. SAS 4632E, Sample Nos. EO1-140) by EPA Method
T01 and T02.  The data results are presented in Tables 17 (CMS) and 18 (TENAX).  The
data are qualified as follows:

     •     Samples E23,  E130, E134,  and E139 lost packing material  during sample
           preparation and were not analyzed, E77 was inadvertently injected before the
           GC/MS was ready and some loss of volatile organic compounds may have
           occurred.  The results for these samples are considered estimated (J).  E124
           was missing a cap during shipment and therefore may have been exposed to
           the atmosphere.  The results for E124 also are considered estimated (J).

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 50
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
CMS
          Sample E124, a tenax back tube, contained a large number of compounds not
          found in the corresponding front tube. It is suspected that the tube was
          contaminated and the results should not be used.

          For samples E127, E128, El 13, El 14, E93, and E94, the sample volume was
          not recorded, and the volume is estimated. All sample results are considered
          estimated (flagged with  "*").
          The surrogate recoveries (13 to 48 percent and 151 to 1188 percent) of
          samples all samples except E45, E84, E100, and E108, were outside control
          limits. All VOC results for the samples except those  previously listed are
          considered estimated.  Samples E77, E83, E106, and El 11 had one  or more
          surrogate recoveries of 0 to 9 percent. All VOC results for these samples are
          considered estimated (J)  for all detected  results and unusable (R) for all
          nondetected results.

          Matrix spike recoveries for E105 and E106 were outside the control limits for
          1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, and toluene; E71 and E72 for
          1,1-dichloroethene, benzene, toluene, and chlorobenzene; E133 and E134 for
          1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, benzene, and toluene.  Matrix spike
          duplicates were  out of control limits  for E105  and E106 and E133 and E134
          for 1,1-dichoroethene, trichloroethene,  benzene, toluene, and chlorobenzene,
          and E71 and E72 for 1,1-dichlorethene, toluene, and chlorobenzene.  The
          results in the unspiked samples are considered estimated (J) for by the CRL
          reviewer.

          Because of calibration outliers,  the detected results for chloromethane, acetone,
          chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and xylene  (all samples) are considered
          estimated (J). Also due  to calibration outliers, the results for
          1,1,2,2-tetrachlorethane (E15-21, E43-50,  E71-79,  E103-108, E133, E136-138,
          and E140), ethylbenzene (E15-21), carbon tetrachloride (E51-56 and  E73-75)
          and acetone (E73-75) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and
          unusable  (R) for nondetected results for  this compounds.

          Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (3  ng/tube), methylene chloride (6
          to 190 ng/tube), and toluene (3 to 34 ng/tube) were found in the  method
          blanks. Chloromethane (17 to  410 ng/tube), trichloroethene (3 to 9 ng/tube),
          1,1,2-trichloroethane (1 to  17 ng/tube), tetrachlorethene (1 to 23 ng/tube),
          1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethene  (75 to 160 ng/tube), styrene (5 to 350 ng/tube),
          ethylbenzene (2 to 84 ng/tube), xylene (3 to 130 ng/tube), and chlorbenzene (65
          ng/tube) were found in the method blanks.  Samples associated with  these
          blanks which contain the common laboratory contaminants at concentrations

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 51
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
TENAX
           less than 10 times or less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered
           unusable (flagged "B").

           One or more  internal standards were out of control limits for samples E18,
           E20-22, E24-28, E43-46, E48, E52, E53, E56, E71-79, E82-84, E99, E100,
           E102-106, E108,  E110, Bill, E127, E129, E131, E135, E137, and E138, and
           the results for compounds associated with these standards are considered
           estimated (J)  for these samples.

           Samples with  breakthrough between the front and back CMS tubes are
           considered estimated for those compounds (flagged "J") (Table 10-8).

           Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits are listed in Table 10-9 and the
           results are considered estimated (J).

           Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (0.5 jig/m3), toluene (0.3 to
           0.9 vig/m3), and methylene chloride (1.1 to 54.2 yg/m3) were found in the field
           or trip blanks. Benzene (23.3 ]ig/m3), chlorobenzene (0.3 to 0.6 yg/m3),
           chloromethane (7.1 jig/m3), ethylbenzene (0.04 to 0.1 ]ig/m3),
           1,1,2-trichloroethane (0.4 ji/m3), trichloroethene (0.2 ng/m3),  1,1-dichloroethene
           (0.4 jig/m3), styrene (0.1 to  1.5 >ig/m3), and xylene (0.1 to 1.2 jig/m3) were also
           found in the field or trip blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks which
           contain the common laboratory contaminants at concentrations less than
           10 times, or concentrations less than 5 times  the blank concentrations are
           considered unusable (flagged "B").
           The surrogate recoveries of samples E34, E36, E38-42, E65, E58-62, E67, and
           E85-89 (156 to 210 percent) were outside control limits and the results are
           biased high and are considered estimated (J).

           Matrix spike recoveries for E57 and E58, E91 and E92, and El 19 and 120
           were outside the control limits for toluene.  Matrix spike duplicates were out of
           control limits for El 19 and E120 for toluene. The results in the unspiked
           samples are considered estimated (J) for this compound by the CRL reviewer.

           Because of calibration outliers, the positive results for chloromethane,
           bromomethane, vinyl chloride, chloroethane,  methylene chloride, carbon
           disulfide, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, chloroform,
           1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1,1,-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, vinyl acetate,
           bromodichoromethane, 1,2-dichlorpropane, trichloroethene, benzene,
           cis-l,3-dichloropropene, bromoform, tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2,-tetrachloethane,

-------
                                                                         TABLE  10-8
                                                                       C &  H LANDFILL
                                                       SAMPLES  EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL  LIMITS
                                                                        CMS--EVENT 2
                                                                                                                                                      page i ol 2
Samples

Chemical
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 . 2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE  (TOTAL)
E17.E18   E19.E20   E21.E22   E25.E26   E43.E44   E45.E46   E51.E52   E71.E72   E73.E74   E75.E76   E79.E80   E81.E82   E99.E100


                    X                                                                           .   X
                    X
                    X

-------
                                                                                                                                                      page 2 ol  2
                                                              TABLE  10-8
                                                            C & H  LANDFILL
                                            SAMPLES EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL LIMITS
                                                             CMS--EVENT 2


Samples                       £10I.E102 E103.E104 E105.E106 E107.E108  E109.E110 E131.E132 E135.E136 E137.E138

chemical
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE                                                                        X
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE                                                                X
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE                        X                                                 X
CHLOROBENZENE                                               X                   X
CHLOROMETHANE                                     XXX
ETHYLBENZENE                  XX                              X                   XX
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE                             .    X
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE                                                                           X         X
XYLENE (TOTAL)                          X

-------
                                                    TABLE 10-9
                                                   G & H LANDFILL
                                        SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL  LIMITS
                                                   CMS--EVENT 2
samples

Chemical
1.1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
E17.E19   E18.E20   E49.E51    E75.E77   E76.E78   E107.E109 E108.E110 E127.E128

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 52
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
           toluene, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and xylene (all samples) are
           considered estimated (J).  Also because of calibration outliers, the results for
           acetone, 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-hexanone (all samples), and
           1,1,2,2-tetrachoroethane (E40-42, E57-62, and E68) are considered estimated (J)
           for all detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for this
           compounds.

           Carbon disulfide  (28 ng/tube), benzene (3 ng/tube), 4-methyl-2-pentanone (45 to
           480 ng/tube), styrene (5 to 140 ng/tube), xylene (5 to  160 ng/tube),
           chlorobenzene  (5 ng/tube), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (140 to 250 ng/tube),
           bromoform (18 to 79 ng/tube),  and ethylbenzene (9 to 180 ng/tube), were
           found in the method blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks which
           contain contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
           concentrations  are considered unusable (flagged  "B").

           One or more internal standard was out  of control  limits for samples E41 and
           E70 and the results  for compounds associated with these standards are
           considered estimated (J) for these samples.

           Common laboratory contaminants, toluene (0.3 to  10.8 pgym3) and methylene
           chloride (0.6 to 17.5 jig/m3) were found in the field or trip blanks. Carbon
           disulfide (0.4 yg/m3), benzene (0.1 to 0.4 jig/m3), ethylbenzene  (0.5 yg/m3),
           trichloroethene (0.2  ]ig/m3), styrene (0.3  pg/m3), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (0.8 yg/1)
           and xylene (0.1 to 3 jig/m3) were also found in the field or trip blanks.
           Samples associated with these blanks which contain the common laboratory
           contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times, or less than  5 times the
           blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

           Samples with breakthrough from front to back tubes exceeded  control limits for
           Tenax are listed  in Table 10-10, and the results  are considered estimated (J)
           for  these compounds in the listed samples.

           Duplicate RPD which exceeded control limits are listed in Table 10-11.  Results
           are considered estimated  (J) for the compounds in the listed  samples.
                         ROUND 31—FIELD SAMPLING

GROUNDWATER—INORGANIC ANALYSES

Eighteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets, and two
field blanks were analyzed by KEYTX for inorganic analytes (Case 12961, ITR
Nos. MEBF37-38, MEBF41-42, MEBF44-46, MEBF48, MEBF50, MEBF56-60,
MEBF66-67, and MEBF75-76) by low concentration procedures. The data results are
presented in Table  19.  The data are  qualified as follows:

-------
                                                              TABLE 10-10
                                                             C & H LAM>FILL
                                              SAMPLES  EXCEEDING BREAKTHROUGH CONTROL  LIMITS
                                                             TENAX--EVENT 2
Samples

ChemicaI
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE
BENZENE
BROMOME THANE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
                               E03.ECM    E09.E10    E1I.E12    E29.E30   E31.E32    E33.E34    E35.E36   E39.E40   E67.E68    Et1S.El 16  El 21.E122

-------
                                                                                  TABLE 10-11
                                                                              .   C 4 H LANDFILL
                                                                      SAMPLES EXCEEDING RPD CONTROL  LIMITS
                                                                                 TENAX--EVENT  2


Samples                                           E03.E05   E04.E06   E35.E37   E36.E38   E61.E63   E93.E95    E113.E115  E114.E116

Chemical
1.1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE                             X                                       X
1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE                                                                        X
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ACETONE
BENZENE                                           XX                             XX
CARBON DISULFIDE                                            X                             XXX
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE                              X                                                           XX
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM                                                                                          X
CHLOROME THANE                                     X         X
ETHYLBENZENE                                                          X                   X
METHVLENE CHLORIDE                                XXX                             X
TETRACHLOROETHENE                                 X                   X                   X                   X
TOLUENE                                                               XXX
TRICHLOROETHENE                                   X                                       X
XYLENE (TOTAL)                                                        X                   X

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 53
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    The spike sample recovery for cadmium (133 percent) is above control limits.
          The data may be biased high, and all detected results for these samples are
          considered estimated (flagged "J").

     •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects. The results are considered estimated (J) for
          lead (MEBF38, MEBF42, MEBF44-46, MEBF48, MEBF50, MEBF56-60, and
          MEBF 75-76); arsenic (MEBF45, MEBF48, MEBF50, MEBF58, MEBF60, and
          MEBF75); selenium (MEBF37-38, MEBF44, MEBF50, MEBF56-57, MEBF60,
          and MEBF75-76); and thallium (MEBF42, MEBF44-46, MEBF48, MEBF50,
          MEBF56-60, MEBF66-67, and MEBF75-76).

          Calcium (74 to  97.2 jig/l), chromium (5.1 jig/1), copper (11.2 to 15.2 jig/1), and
          iron (24.9 to 45.84 vg/1) were found in the calibration or preparation blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than  5 times the blank concentrations are  considered
          unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Field duplicates for  samples MEBF57 and MEBF76 were out of control limits
          for arsenic, manganese, and selenium. The results for these analytes are
          considered estimated (J) in these samples. Field duplicates for samples
          MEBF45 and MEBF48 were out of control limits for zinc and the results for
          this analyte are considered estimated (J) in these samples.

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and one
field blank were  analyzed by KEYTX for inorganic analytes (Case 12916, ITR
Nos. MEBFOO-01, MEBF20, MEBF27, MEBF32-36, MEBF39-40, MEBF43, MEBF49,
MEBF51, MEBF54, MEBF61, MEBF63-64, and MEBF73-74) by low concentration
procedures.  The data results are presented in Table 19.  The data are qualified as
follows:

     •    The spike sample recovery for cadmium (146 percent)  is above control limits.
          The data may be biased high, and all detected results for these samples are
          considered estimated (flagged "J").

The spike sample recovery for  iron (58.6 percent), selenium (68 percent), and thallium
(29 percent) are below control  limits.  The data may be biased low, quantitation limits may
be higher than reported  for these analytes, and the data are considered estimated (J) for
iron and selenium.  For  thallium, the data are considered estimated (J) for  all detected
results and unusable  (flagged "R") for all nondetected results.

     •    The post-digestion spike for  furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results are considered estimated (J) for
          lead (MEBF32-33, MEBF35-36, MEBF39-40, MEBF43, MEBF51, MEBF54,

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 54
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          MEBF61, and MEBF63-64, and MEBF73-74; arsenic (MEBF01); selenium
          (MEBFOO, MEBF35-36, MEBF40, MEBF43, MEBF64, and MEBF73); and
          thallium (MEBF01, MEBF20, MEBF32, MEBF34, MBEF35, MEBF43, and
          MEBF54).

     •    Method duplicates were outside the control limits for arsenic (25.9 RPD) and
          the results for this compound are considered estimated (J) because of poor
          precision.

          Copper (12.4 to 17.5 yg/1), iron (33.3 yg/1), nickel (34.8 yg/1), thallium (4.9 yg/1),
          and zinc (8.1 yg/1) were found in the preparation or calibration blanks.
          Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants at
          concentrations less than 5 times the blank concentrations are considered
          unusable (flagged "B").

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two samples of replicate sets
were analyzed by Weyerhaeuser Company (WEYER) for inorganic analytes (Case 12961,
ITR Nos. MEBF02-19, MEBF21, and MEBF22) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 19.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference  effects.  The results are considered estimated  (J) for
          lead (MEBF07 and MEBF09); thallium (MEBF03, MEBF12, MEBF15,
          MEBF16, and MEBF18); and selenium (MEBF04-08, MEBF11-13, MEBF15-18,
          and MEBF21-22).

          Antimony (17.7 to 21 iig/1), cadmium (2 yg/1),  calcium (19.6 to 63.2 yg/1),  lead
          (2.9 yg/1), magnesium (183.4 to 259.8 yg/1), potassium (374.2 to 534 yg/1),
          sodium (16 to 61.7 yg/1), and vanadium (2.8 to 3.3 yg/1) were found in the
          calibration or  preparation blanks.  Samples  associated with these blanks that
          contain these contaminants at concentrations less than  5 times the blank
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Eighteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set, two
samples of replicate sets, and three field blanks were analyzed by WEYER for inorganic
analytes (Case 12961, ITR Nos. MEBF23-25, MEBF28-31, MEBF47,  MEBF52-53,
MEBF55, MEBF62, MEBF65, and MEBF68-72) by low concentration procedures. The
data results are presented in Table 19.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Holding times were exceeded for mercury analysis and all mercury results are
          considered estimated (J).

     •    The spike  sample  recovery for lead (0 percent) and thallium (74.8 percent) are
          below control limits. The data may be biased  low, quantitation limits may be
          higher than reported for these analytes, and the data are  considered estimated

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 55
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          (J) for thallium. For lead, the data are considered estimated (J) for all
          detected results and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.

     •    The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits
          indicating interference effects.  The results are considered estimated (J) for
          selenium (MEBF23-25, MEBF28-31, MEBF47, MEBF52, MEBF53, MEBF55,
          MEBF62, and MEBF69);  arsenic (MEBF23-24 and MEBF31); and thallium
          (MEBF23-24, MEBF29, MEBF53, MEBF55, and MEBF69).

     •    The serial dilution results  for zinc (47.4 percent) indicate interference and the
          results for this  element are considered estimated (J).

     •    Aluminum (151.4 yg/1), arsenic (1.3 to  1.4 yg/1), calcium (8 to 41.4 yg/1), cobalt
          (1.0 jig/1), iron  (10.9 jig/1), lead (3.0 yg/1), and sodium (11.7 to 641.3 vg/1) were
          found in the calibration or preparation blanks.  Samples associated with the
          blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the
          blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

          Aluminum (77.7 to 95.6 pg/1), arsenic  (1.1 to 1.2 jig/1), barium (1.6 to 3.5 pgfl),
          calcium (67.2 to 811 vg/1), copper (13.7 vg/1), iron (17.6 to 55.2 yg/1), lead
          (4.7 jig/1), magnesium (130 to 268 vg/1), manganese (1.1 yg/1), sodium (146 to
          1,230 jig/1), and zinc (7.4 to 9.8 yg/1) were found in the field blanks.  Samples
          associated with these blanks (all groundwater sample groups listed above) that
          contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the blank
          concentrations  are considered unusable (flagged "B").

GROUNDWATER—ORGANIC ANALYSES

Seven monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field blank
were analyzed by PEI for  volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds  (VOCs  and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961,  OTR Nos. EEY09-11, EEY23-24, and
EEY71-72) by low concentration procedures. One trip blank was also analyzed for volatile
organic compounds as part of this sample group  (EFQ78).  The data results  are presented
in Table 19.  The data are qualified as follows:

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY24 were slightly outside the control
          limits for 1,1-dichloroethene, phenol, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 4-nitrophenol,
          2,4-dinitrotoluene, dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4'-DDT. The matrix spike duplicate
          RPD was slightly outside the control limits for the same sample for
          1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, and pyrene. The  unspiked sample
          was not qualified by the CRL reviewer based on these results.

     •    Although the quality control criteria for confirmation columns for pesticides
          were not met,  the data were not qualified based on this result because no
          pesticides were detected.

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 56
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
     •    A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (3 vg/1), was found in
          the  method blank.  Samples associated with this blank that contain this
          contaminant at concentrations less than ten times blank concentrations are
          considered unusable (flagged "B").

Nineteen monitoring well groundwater samples including two replicate sets and two field
blanks were  analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs
and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR Nos. EEY36-38, EEY41-42,
EEY44-46, EEY48, EEY50, EEY56-60, EEY66-67, and EEY75-76) by low concentration
procedures.  One trip blank was also analyzed for volatile organic compounds as part of
this sample group (EEY99). The data results are presented in Table  19.  The data are
qualified as follows:

     •    The VOC fraction of samples EEY41 and EEY46 were diluted and reanalyzed
          as EEY41RE and EEY46RE.

     •    Holding times were exceeded for the SVOC fraction extractions for EEY48  and
          all SVOC results for this sample are considered estimated (J).

     •    Xylene in EEY46, and xylene and toluene in EEY41  exceeded the linear range
          of the instrument and the results for these  compounds in these samples are
          considered estimated (J).  Use the results from the diluted sample, EEY46RE
          and EEY41RE, for these compounds.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY59  were outside the control limits for
          4-chloro-3-methylphenol, pentachlorophenol, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene,
          gamma-BHC, and 4,4'-DDT. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outside the
          control limits for the same sample for  4-nitrophenol, gamma-BHC, and
          4,4'-DDT. The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) for these
          compounds by the CRL reviewer.

     •    Because of calibration outliers, the  positive results are considered estimated  (J)
          for  methylene chloride (EEY36-38, EEY41, EEY41RE, EEY42, EEY44-45,  and
          EEY50), 1,2-dichloroethene (EEY36-38, EEY41-42, EEY41RE, EEY44-45,
          EEY48, EEY50, EEEY56-57, EEY59,  EEY75-76,  and EEY99), benzoic acid
          (EEY48, EEY50, EEY56-58, EEY60, EEY66, EEY75-76), 3-nitroaniline
          (EEY48), and bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (EEY36-38, EEY41-42, and EEY59).
          Also because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EEY58,
          EEY46RE, EEY60, EEY66, and EEY67) are considered estimated  (J) for all
          detected results and unusable (R) for nondetected  results for these  compounds.

     •    A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (1 jig/1), was found in a
          method  blank.  Samples associated with this blank  that contain these

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 57
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the contaminant
          concentrations  are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Field duplicates for samples EEY45 and EEY48 were out of control limits for
          3-nitroaniline, phenanthrene, phenol, and 4,4-DDD, and the results for these
          compounds are considered estimated (J) in these samples.

     •    Field duplicates for samples EEY57 and EEY76 were out of control limits.
          The results are considered estimated (J) in these samples for benzene, xylene,
          benzoic acid, naphthalene, phenol, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethene,
          1,2-dichloroethene, 2-butanone, ethylbenzene, styrene, toluene, trichloroethene,
          2-methylphenol, and diethylphthalate.

Eleven monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by PEI for volatile and  semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR No. EEY25, EEY28-31, EEY47,
EEY52-53, EEY62, EEY65, and EEY70) by low concentration procedures.  Two trip
blanks were  also analyzed for volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group
(EFQ76-77).  The data results are presented in Table 19.   The data are qualified as
follows:

          The SVOC fraction of sample EEY47 was reanalyzed as EEY47RE because of
          internal standards outside control limits.  The SVOC fraction of EEY52 was
          dilated and reanalyzed as EEY52DL.

     •    Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in EEY52 exceeded the linear range of the
          instrument and the result for this compound in  this sample is  considered
          estimated (J).  Use the result from the diluted sample, EEY52DL, for this
          compound.

     •    For sample EDF47, the internal standard  area counts were  out of the control
          limits for one SVOC internal standard.  The sample was reanalyzed as
          EEY47RE with the same results. Compounds associated with this standard in
          these samples  are considered estimated (flagged "J") for all detected results
          and unusable (R) for all nondetected results.

     •    Matrix spike recoveries for sample EEY29 were slightly outside the control
          limits for dieldrin.  The unspiked sample was not qualified by the CRL
          reviewer based on these results.   Matrix spike recoveries for sample  EEY29
          were outside the control limits for 4-nitrophenol and pentachlorophenol.  The
          unspiked sample was considered estimated (J)  for these compounds by the
          CRL reviewer.

      •    Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (9 yg/1) and 2-butanone (6 yg/1),
          were found in the method blank. 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (3  pig/1) and

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 58
.July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
           2-hexanone (3 pg/1) were also found in the method blanks.  Samples associated
           with these blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations less than
           10 times the common laboratory contaminant, or 5 times the other compound
           blank concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and one field
blank were analyzed by PEI for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR  Nos. EEY02-08, EEY12-19, EEY21-22,
EEY55, and EEY68-69) by low concentration procedures.  The  data results are presented
in Table 19.  The data are qualified as follows:

      •     Surrogate spike recoveries were low for the pesticide surrogate for EEY06
           (21 percent).  All pesticide/PCB results for this sample are considered
           estimated (flagged "J").

      •     Because of calibration outliers, the detected results for chloroethane (EEY02,
           EEY04-05, EEY07, EEY12, EEY14-19, EEY55, and EEY68) are considered
           estimated (J).

      •     Matrix spike recoveries  for sample EEY05 were outside the control limits for
           dieldrin.  The unspiked  sample was considered estimated (J) by the CRL
           reviewer.

      •     Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (1 jig/1), acetone (7 to
           22 jig/1), and 2-butanone (6 to 9 yg/1)  were found in  the method blanks.
           Bromoform (2 pg/1), 2-hexanone (3 to  6 jig/1), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (2 to
           4 jig/1), and 4-methyl-2-pentanone (3 to 4 jig/1) were  also found in the method
           blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that contain these contaminants
           at  concentrations less than 10 times the common laboratory contaminant
           concentrations or 5 times the other contaminant concentrations, are considered
           unusable (flagged "B").

Nineteen groundwater  samples from monitoring wells including two replicate sets and one
field blank were analyzed by COMPU for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs and SVOCs), and pesticides/PCBs (Case 12961, OTR Nos. EEYOO-01, EEY20,
EEY27, EEY32-35, EEY39-40, EEY43, EEY49, EEY51, EEY54, EEY61, EEY63-64, and
EEY73-74) by low concentration procedures.  One trip blank was also analyzed for  volatile
organic compounds as  part of this sample group (EFQ79).  The data results are presented
in Table 19.  The data are qualified as follows:

           The VOC fraction of sample EEY20 was diluted and reanalyzed as EEY20RE.

      •     Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (EEY20RE, EEY32,
           and EEY35) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable
           (R) for nondetected results for this  compound.  Because of calibration outliers,

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 59
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          the positive results for chloroethane (EEYOO-01 and EEY20) and acetone
          (EEYOO-01 and EEY20) are considered estimated (J).

     •    The matrix spike recoveries were outside the control limits for
          4-chloro-3-methylphenol, pentachlorophenol, pyrene, and gamma-BHC for
          EEY51.  The unspiked sample was considered estimated (J) by the CRL
          reviewer for these compounds.

     •    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (1 yg/1) was found in the method blank. Samples
          associated with this blank that contain this contaminant at concentrations less
          than 5 times the blank concentration  are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    In EEY20, xylene exceeded the linear range of the instrument and the results
          for this compounds in this  sample are considered estimated (J).  Use the
          results from the diluted sample, EEY20RE,  for this compound.

     •    Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (1 to 77 pg/1), acetone
          (26 ]ig/l), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (90 jig/1), and toluene (5  to 7 yg/1) were
          found in the field or trip blanks.  1,1,1-Trichloroethane (1 to 2 jig/1) was also
          found in the field or trip blanks.  Samples associated with these blanks that
          contain these contaminants at concentrations less than 10 times the common
          laboratory contaminant concentrations, or 5  times the other contaminant
          concentrations are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Field  duplicates for samples EEY40 and EEY74 were out of control limits for
          ethylbenzene, and the results for this  compound are considered estimated (J) in
          these samples.  Field duplicates for samples EEY51 and EEY27 were out  of
          control limits for chloroethane, benzoic acid, and phenol, and the results for
          these compounds are considered estimated (J) in these samples.

GROUNDWATER—CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS

Twenty-three groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two  replicate sets and
two field blanks were analyzed by ICM for TDS, alkalinity, COD, TOC, total phosphate,
ammonia, nitrate plus nitrite, chloride, sulfate, and oil and grease (Case SAS 4987E,
Sample Nos. E01-05 and E36-53) by low concentration  procedures. Eighteen samples of
this sample group were also analyzed  for BOD (E36-53). The data results are presented
in Table 20.  The data  are qualified as follows:

     •    BOD (2 mg/1) was found in a field blank. Samples associated with this blank
          that contain BOD at concentrations less  than 5 times the blank concentrations
          are considered unusable (flagged "B").

     •    Field duplicates for samples E49 and E53 were out of control limits for  BOD,
          COD, TOC, and sulfate and the results for  these analytes are considered

-------
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 10
Page 60
July 21, 1989
GLO65561.DE.DV
AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
          estimated (J) in these samples. Field duplicates for samples EEY51 and EEY27
          were out of control limits for chloroethane, benzoic acid, and phenol and the
          results for these compounds are considered estimated (J) in these samples.
GLT959/012.50

-------
21-Dec-89
                                                                              Table 1
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 1 of 6)
                                                                            G & H LANDFILL
                                                                RI PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                   MONITORING WELLS - INORGANIC ANALYSIS
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH01A-01
MET 269
11/29/88



46.6
202
138000



10300

42000
118


23700


47600
R
504 B
GH01B-01
MET270
11/29/88



14.8
253
78200



993

27000
26.4


3700 J


16200
R
746 B
GH01C-01
MET280
12/02/88




1440
216000



368

95700
56


6530 J


1180000 J

27 JB
GH02A-01
MEBG03
12/01/88

30.3 JB

45.4
542
119000


6 JB
12500

43400
112


50500


101000

569 JB
GH02B-01
MEBG02
12/01/88

34.6 JB

19.5
356
97500
4.6 J
4 J
6.1 JB
4580

58600
34.2

15.8 J
18700


128000

239 JB
GH02C-01
MEBG08
12/02/88



6.1 J
176 J
42400



126 B

26300
13 J


2850 J


172000

37.2 JB
GH03A-01
MEU496
12/01/88

42.7 JB

1.8 J
274
129000


8.5 JB
570

54200
649

18.8 J
47400


118000

232 JB
GH04B-01
MET278
11/30/88

33.2 JB

38.4
294
75100


4.5 JB
1030

39800
54.2 B

8 J
4260 J


66500

468 JB
GH04C-01
MET277
11/30/88

32 JB


89.3 J
20300


3.4 JB
53.6 JB

12700
11.2 J


1880 J


125000

23.7 JB
GH05A-01
MET279
12/02/88




136 J
140000



9650
2.4 J
106000
884

21.3 J
23200


111000

1080 JB
GH06A-01
MEU498
12/01/88

42.6 JB

45.4
454
173000

8.9 J
6 JB
12200

61900
636

21.6 J
50100


137000
4.5 J
80 JB
NOTE:
  FR = Field replicate
  FB = Field blank
   B = Blank contamination
   J = Estimated value
   R = Laboratory data not
         usable

-------
21-Dec-89
                                                                              Table 1
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 2  of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH06B-01
MEU499
12/01/88

25.6 JB

316
810
116000

9 J

13500
3.1 J
80100
49.7

35.8 J
82500


194000

534 JB
GH07A-01
MET275
11/30/88



20.1
264
10800



4640

53400
45.1

13.7 J
4610 J


150000

122 JB
GH08C-01
MEBG09
12/02/88



8.7 J
636
76100



597

36100
14.6 J


3840 J


511000

88.3 JB
GH10A-01
MET271
11/29/88



2.7 J
1140
129000



1730

61400
36.4


5310


788000
R
48.4 B
GH10B-01
MET272
11/29/88

37.7 JB


96 J
131000


5.1 JB
139 B

42100
82.5

8.4 J
3550 J
1.1 J

161000

1110 JB
GH10C-01
MET273
11/29/88

33.1 JB


113 J
151000
4.1 J

3.9 JB
22.5 JB

46900
10.3 JB

8.1 J
2950 J
2.3 J

219000

150 JB
GH11B-01
MEBG05
12/01/88

33.9 JB

3.7 J
340
91400


5.5 JB
1640

33400
53.2


8340


55000

55.1 JB
GH12A-01
MEU500
12/01/88

40.7 JB

43
268
141000


10.2 JB
14400

41700
237


16800


65400

121 JB
GH12B-01
MEBGOO
12/01/88



5.4 J
192 J
93400



1390

24400
113


3450 J
1 J

27700

115 JB
GH13B-01
MET284
11/30/88

32.6 JB

24.7
257
110000


5.5 JB
6010

35800
169


13400


55400

59.7 JB
FRGH13B-99
MET289
11/30/88

51.2 JB

25.1
257
111000


9.5 JB
6630

36000
170


13700


56300

134 JB
NOTE:
  FR = Field replicate
  FB = Field blank
   B = Blank contamination
   J = Estimated value
   R = Laboratory data not
         usable

-------
21-Dec-89
                                                                              Table 1
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 3 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/i)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH14B-01
MET253
11/28/88



4 J
109 J
85500



242

24600
88.4


1080 JB


11300
R
16.1 JB
GH14C-01
MET254
11/28/88

511
60 J
7.3 J
26.6 JB
51000



27.7 JB

39 JB



3640 J


20900
R
10.7 JB
GH16A-01
MET268
11/29/88




23.1 JB
140000
4 J


398

33700
50.5

170
2700 J


66200
R
101 B
GH16B-01
MET252
11/29/88

50.3 JB

13.1
139 J
55700



81.1 JB

21100
88.7


1130 J


8180 B
R
1060 B
FRGH16B-99
MET262
11/29/88

27.7 JB

12.9
140 J
55700



75.6 JB
2.4 J
21200
90.5


1140 J


7890 B
R
1340
GH16C-01
MET259
11/29/88

4030

7.5 J
36.8 JB
15200
5.1 J


4600
25.9
3860 J
109 B


3540 J


16700
17.7 J
1020 B
GH17A-01
MET256
11/28/88




42.7 JB
105000



345

35200
60.8
.4

2110 J


196000
R
122 B
GH17B-01
HET257
11/28/88



8.4 J
75.2 J
WOO



78.8 JB

20100
178
.9

1010 JB


8600 B
R
434 B
GH17C-01
MET258
11/28/88

623

4.2 J
134 J
146000



74.9 JB
185
253 JB



3140 J


36100
11.9 J
136 B
GH18B-01
MET261
11/28/88



12.3
118 J
66000



573

25300
50


1620 J


8080 B
R
149 B
GH19A-01
MEW493
12/01/88




27.2 JB
108000
28.1

5.1 JB
143 B

20100
157


5260


51600

168 JB
NOTE:
  FR = Field replicate
  FB = Field blank
   B = Blank contamination
   J = Estimated value
   R = Laboratory data not
         usable

-------
21-Dec-89
                                                                              Table 1
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 4 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
GH20A-01
MET266
11/29/88

26.9 JB


71.9 J
138000



196 B

29000
197


7300


114000
R
709 B
GH20B-01
MET267
11/29/88



22.4
90.3 J
9090



25 JB

5980
10.3 J


1630 J


31000
R
73.4 B
GH21A-01
MEBG06
12/01/88

34 JB

118
405
104000

10.7 J
5.6 JB
13800

48600
51.9

26.1 J
36200


87200

88.2 JB
GH22A-01
MET264
11/29/88



8.1 J
169 J
113000



357

40400
108


3020 J


63200
R
234 B
GH22B-01
MET265
11/29/88

37.3 JB


36.4 JB
78200



25 JB

692 JB



3160 J


24400
R
186 B
GH23A-01
MET263
11/29/88



10.4
29 JB
14900



22.3 JB
5.8
8280
26.7


6040


113000
R
151 B
GH25A-01
MEU494
12/01/88

35.8 JB

39.4
645
91600


13.8 JB
4730

44900
110


57900


86500

505 JB
GH26A-01
HEU495
12/01/88

57.6 JB

93.6
505
135000


8.4 JB
11000

28100
198

9.6 J
28900


51300
3 J
127 JB
103-01
MET285
11/30/88

31.5 JB

12.9
90.2 J
28400


4.6 JB
62 JB
6
32500
9.7 J

11.3 J
34500


100000
5.3 J
209 JB
105-01
MEU497
12/01/88

43.4 JB

78.8
816
179000


4.5 JB
28500

58500
458

9.9 J
64900


86200

92.7 JB
R002X-01
HEU492
12/01/88



10
138 J
59800


3.1 JB
569
29.9
21300
99.3 B


1460 J

8.6 J
9150 B

915 JB
NOTE:
  FR = Field replicate
  FB = Field blank
   B = Blank contamination
   J = Estimated value
   R = Laboratory data not
         usable

-------
21-Oec-89
                                                                              Table 1
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 5 of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
RD08XX-01
MET288
12/01/88



74.6
394
94300



7350
3.4 J
45200
117


18700


73700

1720 J







RD18-01
MET282
11/30/88

27.3 JB

130
55.9 J
103000

4.1 J
5.8 JB
6310

38200
54.2


4890 J


80500

941 JB







RL04-01
MET 290
11/30/88

59.4 JB


1370
215000
11.1
6.7 J
10.9 JB
46200

48900
667 B


53900


77700
3.4 J
51.4 JB







RL06-01
MEU490
11/30/88

80.3 JB

27
1360
132000
6.1 J
25.1 J
8.6 JB
47600

83200
509

48.2
58300


143000
3.9 J
155 JB







RL17-01
MET287
11/30/88



30
304
136000


12.2 JB
16200

32600
358


19900


64500

237 JB







RU07-01
MET283
12/01/88

25.2 JB

65.4
199 J
138000



13600

33500
162


8960
1 J

63200

1050 JB







FRRU07-99
MEU491
12/01/88

30.1 JB

50.7 J
203
139000



13400
2.1 J
33700
166


9330


63700

1420 J







RU12X-01
MEBG01
12/01/88

31.5 JB

49.6
335
139000


6.3 JB
22000
2.2 J
36700
276


31900


70000

1360 J







RU14-01
MEBG04
12/01/88

42.3 JB

52
255
174000
6.5 J
7.4 J
7.8 JB
25200

54700
101

16.6 J
50200


136000
3.4 J
655 JB







RU19-01
MET281
11/30/88

29.1 JB

8.5 J
31.7 JB
456000

6.3 J
5.3 JB
68300

105000
2060

18.8 J
60000


84400

452 JB







GUFB01
MET260
11/28/88

47.6 J


8.6 J
422 J



27.8 J

48.7 J







R
4.8 J








-------
21-Dec-89
                                                                              Table 1
                                                                                                                                                    (Page 6  of 6)
SAMPLE:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM .
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
NOTE:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
usable
GUFB02
MET 274
11/30/88

48.6 J


8.3 J
838 J



41.7 J

146 J






1080 J
R
267







GUFB03
MET276
11/30/88

53.2 J


9.8 J
790 J


3.9 J
19.7 J

104 J






1600 J

15.7 J







GUFB04 GUFB05
MEBG07 MEBG10
12/02/88 12/02/88

28.7 J 46.8 J


3.2 J 5.7 J
526 J 391 J





101 J 54.9 J



222 J


1840 J

11.4 J 37.1 J








-------
19-Sep-89
Table 2
                                                                      (Page  1 of 2)
                                                                              G & H LANDFILL
                                                                    Rl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                     RESIDENTIAL WELLS - ORGANIC RESULTS
SAMPLE: GR01-01 GR01-01RE GR02-01 GR02-01RE GR03-01 GR03-01RE GR04-01 GR06-01 GR10-01
OTR NUMBER: EAL03 EAL03RE EAL06 EAL06RE EAL22 EAL22RE EAL23 EALi>5 EAL02
DATE SAMPLED: 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88
FRGR10-99 GR13-01
EAL01 EAL13
11/28/88 11/28/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 3
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE .5
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 7
2-BUTANONE
2-HEXANONE
ACETONE 6
ACROLEIN
BENZENE .8
CHLOROE THANE .5
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE 25
VINYL CHLORIDE 2
XYLENE (TOTAL)
SEN I -VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
A-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
NOTES:
RE = Reanalyzed by
laboratory
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
TB = Trip blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data
not usable
NA = Not analyzed


J

R
R
JB
R
J
J





(ug/L)
R
R










NA
NA 2
NA
NA 9
NA R
NA R
NA It JB
NA R
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 8
NA
NA

R 2 J
R R










NA
NA 1
NA
NA 5
NA R
NA R
NA A JB
NA R
NA
NA
NA
NA SB
NA 1
NA
NA .9 J

R R
R R










NA
NA .5 J
NA
NA 3
NA R R R
NA R R R
NA 7 JB 5 JB
NA R R R
NA
NA .8 J
NA 1 JB
NA 2 B
NA
NA 2
NA

R
R 1 JB










1 J



R R
R R
4 JB 5 JB
R R


2 B

.7 J
















-------
19-Sep-89                                                                     Table 2                                                               (Page 2 of 2)
                 SAMPLE:   GR14-01     GR19-01     GR21-01     GR31-01     FRGR31-99    GRFB01      GRFB02      GRTB01       GRTB02
             OTR NUMBER:   EAL14       EAL19       EALOO       EAL10       EAL11        EAL24       EAL07       EAL08       EAL04
           DATE SAMPLED:   11/28/88    11/28/88    11/28/88    11/29/88    11/29/88     11/28/88    11/29/88    11/28/88    11/29/88


VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE                       RRRR            RRRRR

2-HEXANONE                       R           R           R           R            R           R           R           R           R
ACETONE                        6 JB        5 JB        7 JB        6 JB         4 JB        5 JB        4 JB        9 JB       14 JB
ACROLEIN                         RR            RR            RRR            RR
BENZENE
CHLOROETHANE

METHYLENE CHLORIDE                                                                         .8 J                     1 J         1 J
TOLUENE                                                38         4 B          2B                    .6 J
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)


SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPO
4-N1TROPHENOL
PHENOL 1 JB 1 JB 2 B 2 B 1 JB 2 B
NOTES:
RE = Reanalyzed by
NA NA
NA NA

         laboratory
  FR = Field replicate
  FB = Field blank
  TB = Trip blank
   B = Blank contamination
   J = Estimated value
   R = Laboratory data
         not usable
  NA = Not analyzed

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                            (Mage i  ol  5)
                                                                                                  C &  M  LAISOFILL
                                                                                        Rl PHASE  III  ROUND I  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                                           MONITORING WELLS  -  ORGANIC  ANALYSIS
SAMPL E :
OIR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GHOIA-OI
EAL42
11/29/99
CHOIB-OI
EAL43
11/29/86
GHOIC-0!
EALS4
12/02/68
CH02A-OI
EBCI6
12/01/86
a 1026-0 I
EBGI7
12/01/88
CH02C-OI
EBC24
12/02/86
GH03A-OI
EBCIO
12/0 I/O
O104B-OI
EAL52
11/30/86
GFO4C-OI
EAL5I
11/30/86
GH05A-OI
F.AL53
12/02/88
GH06A-OI
EBCI2
12/01/88
CH06B-OI
EBCI3
12/01/88
CH07A-OI
EAL49
11/30/88
CH09C-OI
EBC25
12/02/68
CHIOA-OI
EAL44
11/29/99
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  (ug/L)

I. I-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-OICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
1.2-OICHLOIiOPROPANE
2-BUTANQNE

2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON OISULFIOE

CHlOR06ENZfN[
CHLOROE THANE
ETHYLBCMZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE

TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICMLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  (ug/ll

1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-METMYLPHENOl
3.]-OICHLOROeENZIDINE

3-NIIROANILINE
4-CHlOSOANILINl
4-METHYLPHENOL
4-NITDOANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACID
BISI2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
OI-N-BUTVL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE

FLUORENE
N-N1TROSOOIPHENYLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYRENE

PESTICIDES/PCBS  (ug/L I

4.4'-DOD
4. 4'-DOT
            2 )B
            « I
           14

            1 B|
                        2  IB
                                     I  I

                                       R
 2 IB
60
                                    2  I
                                    12
                                    2  I
                                     2  I

                                        H
2 IB
5
                                                 5  I
3 IB

4 I
                                                             I  IB


                                                             I  IB
                                                                          2  ID


                                                                          I  Hi
2 IB
6
                                                                                                                                     I  |B
                                                                                                                                                 5 IB
                                                                                                              3  I

                                                                                                             14  B
                                                                                                                                                 6 I
                                                                                                                                                                         2 IB
                        2 IB
                                                                                                 2 IB       II JB        MB        12 B        4 |B        2 IB
                                    5  I
3 I
NOUS:
  F«  i  Held  replicate
  FB  --  Field  blank
  re  --  Trip blank
   B  :  Blank  contamination
   ]  ;  Estimated value
   R  =  Laboratory data not  usuable
   D  =  Diluted
  NA  =  Not analyzed

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                           (Page 2 ut
                             SAMPLE:
                         OIK  NUMBER:
                       DATE SAMPLED:
CHIOB-OI
CAL49
CHIOC-OI
EAL46
11/29/96
CHIIB-OI
EBC20
12/01/68
CHI2A-OI
EBCI4
12/01/88
01126-01
EBCI5
12/01/81
GHI3B-OI
EAL58
11/30/88
FRGH13B-99
EBC02
11/30/88
CHUB-OI
EAL27
11/28/88
CHUC-OI
EAL28
11/28/88
GHI6A-01
EAL4I
11/29/88
GHI6B-OI
EAL26
11/29/88
FRGHIbB-99
EAL35
11/29/88
OII6C-OI    CHI7A-OI
EAL32       EAL29
11/29/88    H/28/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  IUg/LI

I. I-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-OICHLOROETHENE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-BUTANONC

2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON OlSUlfIDC

CKLOROBENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE

1ETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CULM IDE
XYLENE (TOTAL!

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  (ug/l)

1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2-METHYL NAPHTHALENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
}.}-OICHLOROBENZIOINE

3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROANILINE
4-METHYL PHENOL
4-NITROANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACID
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLIPHTHAIATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE

FLUORENE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYRENE

PtSIICIDtS/PCBS (ug/l)

4.4'-DOO
4.4'-DDT
    J JB
    I IB
    2 IB
                                        10
                                        g
                                        3 I
                                        3 I
                                                    3 I
                                        2  I
                                       24
                                                                 I  I
                                                                6  |B
                                                                 I I
                                                                                                    5  IB
                                                                                                     I  I
                                                                                                     3  I
                                                                                                                                          I  I
                                                                             I  I
                                                                            7 I
                                                                                        S B
                                                                                                                                                     6  IB
                                                                                                                                                      I  I
                                                                                                                                                      3  IB
                            9 IB
                                        3 IB
                                                                5 I

                                                                6 IB
                                                                            5 JB
                                                                                                                            2 IB          3  |B        4  IB
                                                                                                                            2 I
                                                                                                    2 IB
                                                    3 I
NOTES:
  FR  = field replicate
  FB  = field blank
  TB  = Trip blank
   B  = Blank contamination
   )  = Estimated value
   R  ; Laboratory data not usuable
   D  -- Diluted
  NA  = Not analyzed

-------
2i-oec-89                                                                                                 labie 3                                                                                          (Page 3 ul 51






                             SAMPLE:    QII7B-OI     CH17C-01     CHI8B-OI    GHI9A-OI    OI20A-OI    GH20B-OI     GH2IA-OI    GH22A-OI    CH22B-01     GH23A-OI     GH25A-OI     GFI26A-OI    103-01       105-01      RD02X-OI
                        OTB  NUMBER:    EAL30       EAL3I        EAL34       E8C07       EAL19       EAL40       EBG22       EAL37       EAL31       EAL36        EBG08       EBC09       SALS')       EBCII       EBC06
                      DATE SAMPLED:    11/28/88     11/28/88     11/28/88    12/01/88    11/29/88    11/29/88     12/01/88    11/29/88    11/29/88     ll/29/Bfi     12/01/88     12/01/88    11/30/88     12/01/88    12/01/88

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS lug/LI

I.1-DICHLOROETHANE                                                                                                                                                                         2 |
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DlCHLO«OETHeNE                                                                                                             21                                             I J
1. 2-DICHLOROPIIOPANE
2-BUTANONE                                   RB8R6SRS8BRRRRR

2-HEXANONE
4-«ETHVL-2-PENIA^JONE
ACETONE                                                5  JB                                 > IB                                            9 JB         >  III                     I IB       1} IB        2 IB
BENZENE                                                                                                          140 D                                                     '   56          10          It
CARBON DISU.FIOE                           4 I          3  I                                                                                                                                 19

CHLOROBENZENE                                                                                                                                                                  I I                     14
CmOHOE THANE                                                                                                      22                                               5 I         75           2 J
ETHYLBENZENE                                                                                                       9
METHYLENE CHIORIDE                                                                         2 IB                                                        3  IB

TE1RACHLOROETHENE
TOIUENE                                                2  |B                                 I IB        I IB
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINVL CML08IDE                                                                                                                 I I
XVIENE (TOTAL!                                                                                                   940 D                                                                                30

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  (UQ/II
 1.2-DICHlOROeENZENt
3.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL                                                                                                21  I
2-METHYL NAPHTHALENE
J-METHYLPHENOl
3.3-DICHLOK08ENZIDINE                                                            *                                                                                                          K

3-NITROANILINE                               >                        R
4-CHLOROANILINE
4-METHYLPHENOL
4-NITROANILINE                                           >
BENZOIB I ELUORANTHENt

BENZOIC ACID
BISI2-CHLOROETHYLI ETHER                                                                                                                                                       3  I
BISU-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE                 2  IB         6  IB                     2 JB        18 6        4  IB                    5 IB        43  B         MB                                 4 |B         13 B
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE                                               5 I                                                         3 I
FLUORANTHENE

FLUODENE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE                     J  IB         3  B|                     3 I         4 I
NAPHIHALENE                                                                                                                                                                                           ^ I
PHENANTHRF.NE
PHENOL                                                                                                             61                                                          5|                     21
PYRENE

PESTICIDES/PC8S  (ug/LI
» f -000
4.4 -DO1
NOIES:
  FR  = Field replicale
  FB  -• Field blank
  TB  = Tr ip blank
   B  : Blank contamination
   I  = Estimated  value
   R  : Laboratory data not  usuable
   D  = Diluted
  MA  : NO! analyzed

-------
                                                                                                          lable 3
                                                                                                                                                                                                           (Cage 4 ol  5)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
RD08XX-01
EBCOO
12/01/88
R018-01
EAL57
RL04-OI
EBG03
11/30/88
RL06-OI
EBC04
11/10/88
RL 17-01
EAL60
11/30/88
RW07-01
EAL56
12/01/88
FRRW07-W
EBG05
12/01/88
RWI2X-OI
EBG16
12/01/88
RW14-OI
EBC1V
12/01/88
RWI9-01
EAL55
11/10/88
CWFBOI
EAL33
11/28/98
CWFB02
EAL47
11/10/88
CWFBOI
EAL50
11/10/88
GWFB04
EBC2]
12/02/88
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  (Ug/LI

I. I-DICHLOROETHANE                                                                1 I
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE                                                              140 D|
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-BUTANONE                                      R            R            R         II I

2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE                                                            770 D
ACETONE                                       2  IB         4  IB        1  IB      180 D|B
BENZENE                                       5            2|        180          140 D|
CARBON Dl SUE IDE                                         43            II          6

CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROE THANE                                  7  |
ETHYLBENZENE                                                                   1000 D
METHYLENE CHLORIDE                            2  IB        12  B                    79 D|B

TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE                                       I  IB                     2  IB      410 DB
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE                                                                   18
XYLENE (TOTAL)                                                       36         6800 D

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  lug/I I

1.2-DICHlOROBENZENE
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL                                                              130 J
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE                                                   2  I
2-METHYLPHENOL                                                                   45 |
1.3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE                           R            R            R            R

3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROANIllNE
4-METHYLPHENOL                                                                  140
4-NITROANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE                                                  2  I

BENZOIC ACID                                              21         10  I
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYll ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE                    60 B         2  IB        6  |B
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE                                                          1  I

FLUORENE                                                              2  |
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE                        1  I
NAPHTHALENE                                                          14
PHENANTHRENE                                                          5  I
PHENOL                                                                           19 |
PYRENE                                                                3  |

PLSIICIOES/PCBS (ug/LI

4.4'-DOD                                                            0.3
4.4'-OOT
                                                                                              4  IB
                                                                                              2  I
                                                                                             13
                                                                                              4  I
                                                                                                          2 I

                                                                                                            R
 4 I
42 |
3 |

  R

3 I

4 IB
4 I
I I
                                                                                                                      I  IB
                                                                                                                                  6 I
                                    67 IB
                                  1500
                                                                                                                                            140 |
                                                                                                                                           2000
                                                                                                                                            62 IB
                                                                                                                                              3 I
                                                                                                                                            160 |
                                                                                                                                              8 I
                                                                                                                      3 IB
                                                                                                                                              8 I
                                                                                                                                              34 B
                                                                                                                                             14
                                                                                                                                             72
                                                                                                          3  I
                                                 I I
                                                 3 I
                                                 6
                                                 3 I
                                                   R
4 IB
3 I
I I
                                                 2 I

                                                 6 B
                                                                                                                                                          I I
                                                                                                                                                          3 I
                                                                                                                                                                                              2 I
                                                                                                                                                                                  3 I
                                                                                                                                                                                                          2 IB
                                                                                                                                                                                                          2 IB
                                                                                                                                                                                                          I I
                                                                                                                                                          2 IB
                                                                                                                                                                                                         53 IB
NOTES:
  FR =  Field replicdte
  FB :  Held blank
  IB =  Tiip blank
   B =  Blank contamination
   I =  Estinaled value
   R =  Laboratory data not usuable
   D =  Diluted
  NA =  NO! analyzed

-------
                                                                                                                                                                 (Page 5 ul 51
      SAMPLE:
  OTR NUMBER:
DA If SAMPLED:
                                       cwFBOj
                                       EBC26
                                       12/02/88
CWIBOI
EAL49
11/29/99
CWTB02
EBG01
11/10/99
                                C*IB04
                                EBG2 I
                                 12/01/99
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  (Ug/L)

I. I-DICHLOROE THANE
1.2-DICHLOROCTHANE
1.2-OICHLOROETHENE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-BUTANONE

2-HEXANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ACETONE
BENZENE
CARBON DISUFIDE

CHLOROBENZENE
CHI OR OE THANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE

IETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  lug/I)

1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4-OIMETHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENl
2-METHYL PHENOL
J. J-DICHLOR08ENZIDINE

1-NIIROANILINE
4-CHIOROANILINE
4-MEIHYLPHENOL
4-NITROANILINE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACID
BISI2-CHLOROEIHYL) ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYl PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE

FLUORENE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYRENE

PESTICiDES/PCfls (ug/L)
2 |B
            I |
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA

      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA

                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA

                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA

                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
                                      NA
4.4'-
4.4'-
NOTES
FR
FB
IB
B
1
R
D
NA
XX) NA NA NA
JDI NA NA NA
Field iepl icale
Field blank
TI ip blank
Blank contamination
Estimated value
Laboratory data not usuable
Diluted
Not analyzed

-------
28-Sep-89
                                                      Table 4
                                                                                                                           (Page 1  of  3)
                                                                  G & H LANDFILL
                                                       RI PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                            SURFACE SOIL • ORGANIC RESULTS
              SAMPLE:   SS01-01
          OTR NUMBER:   EBG42
          SAS NUMBER:
        DATE SAMPLED:
12/02/88
SS02-01
EBG43
4308E12
12/02/88
SS03-01
EBG44
4308E13
12/02/88
                                    SS04-01
                                    EBG27
            SS05-01
            EBG28
SS06-01
EBG29
12/02/88    12/02/88    12/02/88
SS07-01
EBG45
4308E14
12/02/88
FRSS07-99   SS08-01
EBG46
4308E15
12/02/88
                                                                                                                        EBG30
SS09-01
EBG47
                                                                                                                        12/02/88     12/02/88
SS10-01
EBG31
4308E16
12/02/88
PESTICIDES/PCBs (ug/kg)

4,4'-DDE
4.4'-DDT
AROCLOR-1254
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULFAN II
GAMMA BHC (LINDANE)
GAMMA CHLORDANE
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
  7.4 J
  4.9 J
              300 J

               57 J
                                       27
                                                                                                  64
                                                                                                             5.7 J
                                      150
D10XINS/FURANS (ug/kg)
HEXA-CDD
HEPTA-CDD
OCTA-CDD
TETRA-CDF
PENTA-CDF
HEXA-CDF
HEPTA-CDF
OCTA-CDF
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


.226
.442 J
.337 J
.063 J

.054
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FR - Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R - Laboratory data not
    usable
NA - Not analyzed

[File:  TABLE 4.UK1]

-------
28-Sep-89
Table 4
                                                                     (Page 2 of 3)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
SS11-01
EBG32
4308E17
12/02/88
FRSS11-99
EBG33

12/02/88
SS12-01
EBG48

12/02/88
SS13-01
EBG49
4308E18
12/02/88
SSH-01
E8G50
4308E19
12/02/88
SS15-01
EBG34
4308E20
12/02/88
SS16-01
EBG35
4308E21
12/02/88
FRSS16-99
EBG36

12/02/88
SS17-01
EBG37
4308E22
12/02/88
SS18-01
EBG38
4308E23
12/02/88
SS19-01
EBG39

12/02/88
PESTICIDES/PCBs (ug/kg)

4.4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
AROCLOR-1254
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULFAN II
GAMMA BHC (LINDANE)
GAMMA CHLORDANE
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE

DIOXINS/FURANS (ug/kg)
NA - Not analyzed

[File:  TABLE 4.UK1]
                                                        22 J
HEXA-CDD
HEPTA-COD
OCTA-CDD
TETRA-CDF
PENTA-CDF
HEXA-CDF
HEPTA-CDF
OCTA-CDF
FR - Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R - Laboratory data not
usable
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






.107 J
.636 .199 .081
.490 .035 .029
.282 .023 .030
.046 J
.094






NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





.056 J
.849 J
1.697

.092

.277
.242






.150
.400
.105
.146
.017 J
.042
.069





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






-------
28-Sep-89
                                                      Table 4
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 3 of 3)
              SAMPLE:
          OTR NUMBER:
          SAS NUMBER:
        DATE SAMPLED:
SS20-01
EBG40
SS21-01
EBG41
SS22-01
EBG51
SS23-01
EBG52
SS24-01
EBG53
SS25-01
EBG54
SS26-01
EBG55
12/02/88    12/02/88    12/02/88    12/02/88    12/02/88     12/02/88    12/02/88
PESTICIDES/PCBs (ug/kg)

4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
AROCLOR-1254
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULFAN II
GAMMA BHC (LINDANE)
GAMMA CHLORDANE
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE

DIOXINS/FURANS (ug/kg)
  380
NA - Not analyzed

[File:  TABLE 4.UK1]
                         1600 J
                                                  62  J
                                                                         3.7 J
HEXA-CDD
HEPTA-CDD
OCTA-CDD
TETRA-COF
PENTA-CDF
HEXA-CDF
HEPTA-CDF
OCTA-CDF
FR - Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R - Laboratory data not
usable
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE  5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page  1 of 24)
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                RI  PHASE III  ROUND  2 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                           MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH01A-02
OTR NUMBER: EDF88
ITR NUMBER: MEACB8
DATE SAMPLED: 7-27-89

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
ug/l


33.2
223


U5000



7730

38900
166

28000

53600

1720
GH-GUGH01B-02 GH-GWGH02A-02 GH-GUGH02B-02 GH-GUGH03B-02 GH-GWGH03B-02RE GH-GUGH03C-02 GH-GUGH08B-02 GH-GUGH09A-02
EDA61 EDF81 EDF82 EDA49 EDA49 RE EDA52 EDF80 EDA46
MEAA61 MEAC81 MEAC82 MEAA49 NA HEAA52 MEAC80 MEAA46
7-25-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-24-89 7-24-69 7-24-89 7-26-89 7-24-89
ug/l


15.9
232


75800



291 B
15 J
25400
40.6

3010 J

14300

1090
ug/l
52.6 J

14
276


99200



3470

53600
48.9
14.7 JB
17200

125000

496
ug/l


22.9
396


113000



1590

43400
88.7
8.5 JB
45800

105000

318
ug/l


14.6
649
.8 JB

121000


14.6 JB
3930

66300
72.8
18.6 JB
21100

85300

21.9 B
ug/l
MA
HA
HA
IIA
HA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ug/l
953

12.9
128 J
.6 JB

21800


34.4 B
904

9080
25.9
6.5 JB
3390 J

37800

10.4 JB
ug/l


2.9 J
130 J


102000



103 B

29800
188
10.2 JB
4380 J

90800

111
ug/l


32.4
296


86200


36
161

38000
546
13.2
36500

74600

17.4









B
B



JB




JB
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
ChIorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
                                                          810   J
                                                           720
2  J
2 JB
5  B
                             28
                              1  JB
                                                                                           6 JB
                                                          330  J
                                                           250
                                                                                                          1  JB
                                                                                                                         2   J
                                                                                                                         1 JB

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
(Page 2 of  24)
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                RI  PHASE III  ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                           MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH01A-02 GH-GUGH01B-02 GH-GUGH02A-02 GH-GUGH02B-02 GH-GUGH03B-02 GH-GWGH03B-02RE GH-GUGH03C-02 GH-GUGH08B-02 GH-GUGH09A-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - D i ch I orobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb] f luroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254












EDF88 EDA61 EDF81 EDF82 EDA49
MEAC88 MEAA61 MEAC81 MEAC82 MEAA49
7-27-89 7-25-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-24-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l






3 J



3 J 11 3 J
12 B 19 B 27 B 9 JB











2 J 3 J

•
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
EDA49 RE
NA
7-24-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA












EDA52 EDF80 EDA46
MEAAS2 MEAC80 MEAA46
7-24-89 7-26-89 7-24-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l








3 J

4 J
2 JB



























-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 3 of  24)
                 SAMPLE:   GH-GUGH09B-02  GH-GUGH118-02  GH-GUGH12A-02  GH-GUGH12B-02  GH-GUGH14A-02  GH-GUGH14C-02  GH-GUGH1SB-02  GH-GUGH15C-02  GH-GUGH16B-02
             OTR NUMBER:           EDA47          EDF61          EDF76          EDF75          EDF79          EDF62          EDA62          EDA63          EDF68
             ITR NUMBER:          MEAA47         MEAC61         MEAC76         HEAC75         MEAC79         MEAC62         MEAA62         MEAA63         MEAC68
           DATE SAMPLED:         7-24-89        7-27-89        7-26-89        7-26-89        7-26-89        7-27-89        7-25-89        7-25-89        7-27-89

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1 - Tri ch loroethane
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Ch loroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
ug/l


25
278


80800



629

47700
426
10.4 JB
28900

76800

16.8 JB













6 B



ug/l ug/l


2.4 J 28.8
298 J 241


89700 133000



2830 J 10700

30000 38700
46.4 J 218

7180 16900

49300 59800

5.5 JB 18.9 JB


1 J
98



15 J



8 B
20 B
1 JB 1 JB

55
2 JB
ug/l ug/l ug/l
185 J 333

3 J 9 J
203 75.4 J 17.3 JEl


97000 80900 24200


8.7 JB
63.1 JB 281 B

25500 15500 317 JB
116 20.8

3880 J 1780 J 6060

45200 319000 30100

5.6 JB 18.7 JB 4.9 JI3




-- R

4 J





13 B 2 JB
27 B



ug/l


3 J
100 J
.6 JB

79000


9.4 JB
132 B

23100
65.1

1580 J

24900

29.3 B

















ug/l
56.1 J

10.3
38.4 JB


16300



84.2 JB

10800
8.4 JB
5.8 JB
17000
4 J
81800

57.3

















ug/l


12.2
135 J


63600



43.4 JB
1.2 J
20200
85.1 J

1740 J

9350 B

1360 J












16 B





-------
08-Mar-90
                                                     TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 4 of 24)
                 SAMPLE:
             OTR NUMBER:
             ITR NUMBER:
           DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GWGH09B-02
        EOA47
       MEAA47
      7-24-89
GH-GWGH11B-02
        EDF61
       MEAC61
      7-27-89
GH-GWGH12A-02
        EDF76
       MEAC76
      7-26-89
GH-GWGH12B-02
        EDF75
       MEAC75
      7-26-89
GH-GWGHHA-02
        EDF79
       MEAC79
      7-26-89
GH-GUGHUC-02
        EDF62
       MEAC62
      7-27-89
GH-GWGH15B-02
        EDA62
       MEAA62
      7-25-89
GH-GUGH15C-02
        EDA63
       MEAA63
      7-25-89
GH-GUGH16B-02
        EDF68
       MEAC68
      7-27-89
                                    ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo[b]fIuroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodi phenyIamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene

Aroclor-1254
         5 JB
        13  B
         7 JB
        10  B
        12  B
        59  B
                                                                                    2  J
                        5 JB
                        2 JB
                                                                                    7  J
                                                                                    2  J
                                     1.8
                                  NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                           FB = Field blank
                                            B = Blank contamination
                                            J = Estimated value
                                            R = Laboratory data not usable
                                            * = High concentration sample,
                                           NR = Data not received
                                           NA = Not analyzed
                                           DL = Diluted sample
                                           RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                            D = Diluted result
                                           TB = Trip blank
                                                results reported in mg/kg

-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                      (Page 5 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 - D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chi oroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH16C-02 GH-GUGH17A-02 GH-GUGH17B-02 GH-FRGUGH17B-02 GH-GWGH18B-02 GH-GUGH19A-02 GH-GUGH19B-02 GH-GUGH24A-02 GH-GUGH26A-02
EDF67 EDA60 EDA58 EDA59 EDF71 EDF65 EDA54 EDF54 EDF89
MEAC67 MEAA60 MEAAS8 MEAA59 MEAC71 MEAC6S MEAA54 MEAC54 MEAC89
7-27-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-27-89 7-27-89 7-25-89 7-28-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l
724 37.5 J

11.8 11.7 11.1 10.8 J
72.5 J 28.4 JB 83.1 J 88.1 J 134 J 55 J
.6 JB .6 JB .8 JB .5 JB

17200 57700 61500 64000 77600 126000
170


1250 J 38.7 JB 281 B 51.5 JB 664 J
5 1.9 J
6780 17400 19700 20400 25500 26700
26.7 J 46.6 169 176 54.4 J 172 J
6.3 JB
3790 J 1940 J 1150 JB 993 JB 1700 J 4910 J

23700 153000 8180 B 7780 B 8410 B 45200

130 J 188 302 J 720 J 225 J 42 JB






3 J





17 B 1 JB 2 JB 3 JB 13 B
SB 2: JB
14 J

3 JB
ug/l ug/l
341 46.6 JB
30 JB
46.5
76.9 J 589
.6 JB

76500 130000
9.2 J
8.3 JB
9.6 JB
1020 17600
2.5 J
22200 35200
185 102
12.3 JB 11.2 JB
3270 J 35700

22900 80100
5.6 J
40.3 B 69.2 B




-- R


560



530
690 B
1900 B


3500
ug/l


170
626


161000



13900

29200
340

32500

47300

41


3
2
--


210
4
37


4
1


2



















B


J
J
R


J
J



JB
JB


JB

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                             (Page 6 of 24)
                 SAMPLE:
             OTR NUMBER:
             ITR NUMBER:
           DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUGH16C-02
        EDF67
       MEAC67
      7-27-89
GH-GWGH17A-02
        EOA60
       MEAA60
      7-25-89
GH-GUGH17B-02
        EDA58
       MEAAS8
      7-25-89
GH-FRGWGH17B-02
          EDA59
         MEAA59
        7-25-89
GH-GUGH18B-02
        EDF71
       MEAC71
      7-27-89
GH-GWGH19A-02
        EDF65
       MEAC65
      7-27-89
GH-GUGH19B-02
        EDA54
       MEAA54
      7-25-89
GH-GWGH24A-02
        EDF54
       MEAC54
      7-28-89
GH-GUGH26A-02
        EDF89
       MEAC89
      7-27-89
                                    ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/t
                          ug/l
                          ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
1,2-D i chIorobenzene
1,4-D i chIorobenzene
2.4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzolb]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene

Aroclor-1254
         30 B
         2  J
                                                       27  B
                                                        1  J
                                                        3 JB
                                                        3 JB
                                                                                                                   34  J
                                                                                                                    6  J
                                                                                                                    7  J
                                                                                                                  160  J
                                                                                                                   42
                                                     69
                                                      2 JB
                                                                                                                    3  J

                                                                                                                    2  J
                                                                                                                   47
                                                                                                                    9  J

                                                                                                                   10
                                                     11
                                                     11   B
                                                                                                     7  J

                                                                                                     1  JB
                                                                                                                    7  J
                                  NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                           FB = Field blank
                                            8 = Blank contamination
                                            J = Estimated value
                                            R = Laboratory data not usable
                                            * = High concentration sample, results reported in ing/kg
                                           NR = Data not received
                                           NA = Not analyzed
                                           DL = Diluted sample
                                           RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                            D = Diluted result
                                           TB = Trip blank

-------
08-Mar-90
                                            TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 7 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH27A-02 GH-GWGH28A-02 GH-GUGH28B-02 GH-GUGH29A-02 GH-GUGH29B-02 GH-GUGH29C-02 GH-GUGH30A-02 GH-FRGWGH30A-02 GH-GUGH30B-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA57 EDA64 EDA67 EOA77 EDA78 EDA76 EDA74 EDA75 EDA73
ITR NUMBER: MEAA57 MEAA64 MEAA67 MEAA77 MEAA78 MEAA76 MEAA74 MEAA75 HEAA73
DATE SAMPLED: 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
ug/l
73.2 J


26.3 JB


111000



284 B

23700
444
13.6 JB
3580 J

48000

10.5 JB
ug/l



28.5 JB
.5 JB

83900
32.8


72.7 JB

19500
34.8
10 JB
14100

63200

25.8 B
ug/l


2.3 J
121 J


78200



157 B

19500
100
5.8 JB
1460 J

22200

17.5 JB
ug/l
38.9 J

9.6 J
127 J


95300



540
2.2 J
19700
675
12.1 JB
6810

69000

9.2 JB
ug/l
159

2.7
112
.7

88800



1310
3
23600
358
11.6
4430

25200

27.3
J

J
J
JB






J


JB
J



B
ug/l
2930

15.2
666
.9 JB

227000
6 J
9.4 J
6.3 JB
6930
2.2 J
23100
1250
16.9 Jll
3110 J

36200
8.5 J
316
ug/l
654 J

44.5
856
.9 JB

188000

5.7 J
30.6 JB
9320
12.8 J
73000
723 J
26.5 JB
41100

103000

80.6
ug/l
269 J

54.8
1030
.7 JB

153000
6.8 J
4.9 J
•^
7160

69600
292 J
21.7 JB
44500

111000

15.6 JB
ug/l
38.2

39.6
1470


155000



10200

76500
102
23.8
45000

124000

18.5
J













JB




JB
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
2 JB
3 JB
7  J
1 JB
8  B
                                             5  B
                                                           6   J
2 JB
4 JB
                                                                          1 JB
                                                                                                          2 JB
                                                                                                          9  J
                                                                                                         16
11   B
 7  B

-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 8 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH27A-02 GH-GUGH28A-02 GH-GWGH28B-02 GH-GUGH29A-02 GH-GUGH29B-02 GH-GUGH29C-02 GH-GUGH30A-02 GH-FRGUGH30A-02 GH-GUGH30B-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

EDAS7
MEAAS7
7-25-89
ug/l
EDAM
MEAA64
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA67
MEAA67
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA77
MEAA77
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA78
MEAA78
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA76
MEAA76
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA74
MEAA74
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA75
MEAA75
7-25-89
ug/l
EDA73
MEAA73
7-25-89
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-D i chIorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo[b]fIuroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene

Aroclor-1254
                               8 JB
                                             9  J
                                                              10
                                  NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                           FB = Field blank
                                            B = Blank contamination
                                            J = Estimated value
                                            R = Laboratory data not usable
                                            * = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
                                           NR = Data not received
                                           NA = Not analyzed
                                           DL = Diluted sample
                                           RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                            D = Diluted result
                                           TB = Trip blank

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                 TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 9 of 24)
                 SAMPLE:   GH-GUGH31A-02  GH-FRGUGH31A-02   GH-GUGH31B-02   GH-GUGH31C-02  GH-GUGH32A-02  GH-GWGH33A-02  GH-FRGUGH33A-02  GH-GUGH33B-02  GH-GUGH34A-02
             OTR NUMBER:           EDA80            EDA81           EOA82          EOA83          EOF77          EDIF93            EDF94          EDF9S          EDA48
             ITR NUMBER:          MEAA80           MEAA81         MEAA82         MEAA83         MEAC77         MEAC93           MEAC94         MEAC9S         MEAA48
           DATE SAMPLED:         7-26-89          7-26-89         7-26-89        7-26-89        7-26-89        7-27-89          7-27-89        7-27-89        7-24-89

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichl oroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chi oroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
ug/l
69.3 J

28.6
535
.9 JB

141000

9 J

15900
2.6 J
103000
209
24.9 JB
37200

129000

44.6 B







6 J
1 J







2 JB
ug/l
55.2 J

27.1
526
.7 JB

143000

9.4 J

15800

102000
232
25.9 JB
36200
4.1 J
129000

20.9 B







5








1 JB
ug/l
45 J

24.2
1360
.7 JB

173000

5.3 J

9750

105000
160
23.3 JB
63200

166000

59.3







26








1 JB
ug/l
544

5.6 J
58.6 J


13000 B



663

3000 JB
12.4 JB

15400

55400

14.6 JB










2 J


2 JB



ug/l
42.3 J

52.5
550
.5 JB

130000



18400

65600
298
15.3 JB
54200

141000

45.6 B




-- R


11




1 JB




u<
45.7

38
422


112000

8.9

11300

51500
64.3
27.2
56100

118000

15.2




--


17



12
2«



460
J/l
J


J




J

J


J
JB




JB




R


J



JB
B



B
ug/l
39.2 J

39.6
401 J


103000

10.3 J

10000 J

47000
63.7 J
20.4 JB
50500

108000

17.3 JB




-- R


17 J



13 JB
33 B



450 B
ug/l
31.2 J

307
977 J


135000



12800 J

68200
47.4 J
17 JB
34200

112000

25.9 JB




-- R


11




10 B
1 JB


62 B
u<


20.3
176
.6

112000



1480

41200
1150
14.5
38100

62900

45.8












1
5



3/1



J
JB









JB




B












JB
B




-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                            (Page 10 of 24)
                 SAMPLE:
             OTR NUMBER:
             ITR NUMBER:
           DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUGH31A-02
        EDA80
       MEAA80
      7-26-89
GH-FRGUGH31A-02
          EDA81
         MEAA81
        7-26-89
GH-GUGH31B-02
        EDA82
       MEAA82
      7-26-89
GH-GWGH31C-02
        EDA83
       MEAA83
      7-26-89
GH-GUGH32A-02
        EDF77
       MEAC77
      7-26-89
GH-GUGH33A-02
        EDF93
       MEAC93
      7-27-89
GH-FRGUGH33A-02
          EDF94
         MEAC94
        7-27-89
GH-GUGH33B-02
        EDF9S
       MEAC95
      7-27-89
GH-GWGH34A-02
        EDA48
       MEAA48
      7-24-89
                                    ug/l
                          ug/l
                          ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                          ug/l
                          ug/l
                       ug/l
1,2-D i chIorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N - N i t rosod i pheny I am i ne
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene

Aroclor-1254
                                                                                                      4   J
                                                       14  B
                                                        9 JB
                                                     8  JB
                                                        2   J
                                                       13   B
                                                       10  JB
                                                                                                                     7  J
                                                                                                                     2 JB
                                                                       2  J
                                                                                        2   J
                                  NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                           FB = Field blank
                                            B = Blank contamination
                                            J = Estimated value
                                            R = Laboratory data not usable
                                            * = High concentration sample, results reported in nog/kg
                                           NR = Data not received
                                           NA = Not analyzed
                                           DL = Diluted sample
                                           RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                            D = Diluted result
                                           TB = Trip blank

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 11 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1 , 2 -D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chtorobenzene
Chi oroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trich I oroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH34B-02 GH-GUGH35A-02 GH-GUGH35B-02 GH-GUGH36A-02 GH-CWGH36B-02 GH-GWGH37A-02 GH-GUGH38A-02 GH-GUGH38A-02 DL GH-GUGH39A-02
EDAS1 EDF55 EDF56 EDA55 EDA56 EDA68 EDAB6 EDA86 DL EDF70
MEAA51 MEAC55 MEAC56 MEAA55 MEAAS6 MEAA68 MEAA86 NA MEAC70
7-24-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l
38.9 JB
26.6 JB
12.5 71.7
132 J 920


79100 111000

7.6 JB

1050 14000

22700 34000
79.4 123

937 JB 37800

4570 JB 80700
5.8 J
13.2 JB 19.2 JB




-- R


26

17


12 JB
13 B



ug/l ug/l
6010

5 J 15.7
113 J 269


124000 149000
45.4
27.5 J
74.9 B
6240 23800
34
39600 34200
46.2 1200
50.1
3150 J 8180

56700 448000
30 J
12.7 JB 176



3 J
-- R








12 B
22


ug/l ug/l
308

6.7 J 24.4
390 1040
.5 JB

174000 142000
5.7 J


2840 1050

47900 35700
143 467
25.9 JB
2430 J 19600

202000 85400

13.3 JB 25.5 B







4 J
2 J
6 J


4 i!J




ug/l
39.6 J

35.7
1070


155000

5.3 J

8800

49800
198
13 JB
46000

108000

158






1800 JB
1300



2900
1800 B
15000 B


15000 B
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ug/l
32.4

61
385


96200



4800

37000
332

33200

66000

17.9












16




J


J






J


J





JB












B





-------
08-Mar-90                                                                       TABLE 5                                                                (Page  12 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH34B-02
OTR NUMBER: EDA51
ITR NUMBER: MEAAS1
DATE SAMPLED: 7-24-89
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - D i ch I orobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methy I phenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo [b] f I uroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di -n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254
NOTES:











GH-GUGH35A-02 GH-GUGH35B-02 GH-GUGH36A-02 GH-GUGH36B-02 GH-GUGH37A-02
EDF55 EDF56 EDA55 EDA56 EDA68
MEACSS MEAC56 MEAA55 MEAAS6 NEAA68
7-28-89 7-28-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-25-89
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l











7 JB 10 B




2 J






3 J


FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in dig/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE - Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
GH-GUGH38A-02
EDA86
MEAA86
7-26-89
ug/l


120
67
47

330 J




120 B
100



54



400 J

9 J
22

9.5 D












GH-GUGH38A-02 DL GH-GUGH39A-02
EDA86 DL EDF70
NA MEAC70
7-26-89 7-27-89
ug/l ug/l


69 DJ

36 DJ

260 D




96 DJB 1 JB
72 DJ



42 DJ



380 D




12 DJ













-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 13 of  24)
                 SAMPLE:   GH-GWGH40A-02  GH-FRGWGH40A-02  GH-GWGH40B-02  GH-GUGH41B-02  GH-GUGH42B-02  GH-FRGWGH42B-02  GH-GUGH43A-02  GH-GUGH43B-02  GH-GUGH44A-02
             OTR NUMBER:           EDA84            EDAB5          EDA87          EOF66          EOF52            EDF53          EOA45          EDA44          EDA43
             ITR NUMBER:          MEAA84           MEAA85         MEAA87         MEAC66         MEACS2           MHAC53         MEAA45         MEAA43         MEAA42
           DATE SAMPLED:         7-26-89          7-26-89        7-26-89        7-27-89        7-28-89          7-2B-89        7-24-89        7-24-89        7-24-89

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
ug/l
45.4 J

29.4
382


95300



1790

59400
157
15.3 JB
50300

94400

10.2 JB







23


ug/l
33.1 J

31.9
345
.5 JB

85500



1470

55000
132
13 JB
47500

87800

6.8 JB






8 JB
15


ug/l


24.7
1400


92100



2650

64100
20.1
8.5 JB
54500

94700

5.8 JB










ug/l


110
610 J


111000



10200 J

49800
42.7 J
9.6 JB
20500

77900

96.9 J







42 J


ug/l
46.6 JB

24.8
365
1.1 JB

98000



2070

29500
51.7
10.8 JB
2840 J

31200

22.7 B




-- R





ug/l


25.5
371
.56 JB

99700



2090

30000
51.4

2050 J

30700

13,9 JB




-- R





ug/l



89 J

4.3 J
86000



93.2 JB

26600
473
32.3 J
18600

33300

84.3










ug/l
33 J

16.8
351


133000



2900

41900
102
26.8 JB
2590 J

111000

52.8







3 J


US


35.6
340


94800

4.2

7140

45400
135
16.8
45000

87100

28.9







56

17
>/l








J





JB




B









J
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
7  B
13  B
4 JB
                                               1 JB
                                                                                              3 JB
                                                                                            2 JB

                                                                                           26
                                                                                                                           2 JB

-------
08-Har-90
                                            TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page U  of  24)
                 SAMPLE:   GH-GUGH40A-02  GH-FRGWGH40A-02  GH-GUGH40B-02  GH-GUGH41B-02  GH-GUGH42B-02  GH-FRGWGH42B-02  GH-GUGH43A-02  GH-GUGH43B-02  GH-GUGH44A-02
             OTR NUMBER:           EOA84            EDA85          EDA87          EOF66          EOF52            EOF53          EDA45          EDA44          EDA43
             ITR NUMBER:          MEAA84           MEAA85         MEAA87         MEAC66         MEAC52           MEAC53         MEAA45         MEAA43         MEAA42
           DATE SAMPLED:         7-26-89          7-26-89        7-26-89        7-27-89        7-28-89          7-28-89        7-24-89        7-24-89        7-24-89
                                    ug/l
                 ug/l
                ug/l
               ug/l
               ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-D i chIorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthatate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthaiate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene

Aroclor-1254
9  J
3 JB
13
 2 JB
                                                              3  J
2 JB
3 JB
                                                                                           7  J
                                                                                              3  J
                                                                                                           2  J
                                  NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                           FB = Field blank
                                            B = Blank contamination
                                            J = Estimated value
                                            R = Laboratory data not.usable
                                            * = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
                                           NR = Data not received
                                           NA = Not analyzed
                                           DL = Diluted sample
                                           RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                            D = Diluted result
                                           TB = Trip blank

-------
08-Har-90
                                            TABLE  5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 15 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH45A-02 GH-GUI02-02* GH-GWI02-02*
OTR NUMBER: EDA53 EDF49 EDF50 (oil)
ITR NUMBER: MEAA53 MEAC49 MEAC50
DATE SAMPLED: 7-25-89 7-28-89 7-28-89
WML W1L

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
ug/l
693

8.2 J
174 J
.8 JB

92400
10.8

24 JB
7590

46900
486
15.9 JB
26600

67300

59.2
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
GH-GU105-02 GH-GURD08XX-02 GH-GURD18-02 GH-GURD24-02 GH-FRGURD24-02 GH-GURL04-02
EDF90 EDF78 EDF84 EDF96 EDF97 EDF98
MEAC90 MEAC78 MEAC84 MEAC96 MEAC97 MEAC98
7-27-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89 7-27-89 7-27-89
ug/l
35 J

69.7
498


149000



18300

58600
438
15.3 JB
81400

160000

44.6 B
ug/l


71.4
381
.5 JB

89400



5670

41400
91.7

16200

67600

1730
ug/l


111
65.5 J


123000



6530

42200
54.2

5070

88200

500
ug/l


11.5
170 J


65400





21400
43.2 J
15.3 JB
3910 J

33700

31 JB
ug/l


12
172 J


64700





21400
41.3 J
15.8 JB
3480 J

33900

14.8 JB
ug/l
66


1330


214000
6.2
6.2

39400

48600
604
6.8
50300

67300

58.5
J


J



J
J

J


J
JB




J
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-D i chIoroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chtoroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
            2.5 JB

              5  B
2.5 JB

2.5 JB
                                        21
                                        15
5  B
                               2  J
2 JB
3 JB
 33

  3 JB


110
                                                                                                   15  B
                                                                                                    1  J
34
 5  B
 4 JB
                                                                                                  130
                                                                                        7  J
                                                                                      150
                                                                                        1  JB


                                                                                       17   B

-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page  16 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH45A-02 GH-GUI 02-02* GH-GUI02-02* GH-GUI05-02 GH-GURD08XX-02 GH-GURD18-02 GH-GWRD24-02 GH-FRGURD24-02 GH-GURL04-02
OTR NUMBER: EDAS3 EOF49 EDF50 (oil) EOF90 EDF78 EDF84 EDF96 EDF97 EDF98
ITR NUMBER: HEAAS3 MEAC49 MEACSO MEAC90 MEAC78 MEAC84 MEAC96 MEAC97 MEAC98
DATE SAMPLED:


1 , 2-0 i ch I orobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2, 4 -Dime thy I phenol
2-Methylnapthatene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Hethylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzotb] f luroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl pnthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di -n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254













7-25-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-27-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-27-89
WML UIL
ug/l mg/kg mg/kg ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l

1 J









5 JB 3 JB 6 JB 23 B


3 J

1 JB 1 J
2 J


10


22 3 J


NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
UIL = Water immiscible liquid
7-27-89 7-27-89


ug/l ug/l



3



2

1
2
25 B 8
1 J
2
3

1 J
1
2
3
18

4
9
2

















J



J

J
J
JB

J
J


J
J
J


J
J
J














                                          WML = Water miscible liquid

-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 17  of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GURL06-02 GH-GURL17-02 GH-GWRL29-02 GH-GURU05-02* GH-GURUOS-02* GH-FRGURW05-02* GH-FRGURU05-02A* GH-FRGURU05-02B* GH-GURU10-02
EDF99 EDF85 EDF86 EDF44 EDF48 (oil) EDF46 EDF47A (oil) EDF47B (oil) EDF57
MEAC99 MEAC8S MEAC86 MEAC44 MEAC48 HEAC46 MEAC47A MEAC47B MEAC57
7-27-89 7-26-89 7-26-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89
UML UIL WML UIL WML
ug/l
169 J

32.7
2240 J
.5 JB

189000
8.3 J
54.4

53300 J
3.1 J
119000
797 J
109
51700

141000
6.5 J
148 J




-- R


130



170
100 B
49 JB


1300
ug/l


41.1
392


147000



13700

33800
376

23000

73500

175




-- R


24 J




2 JB




ug/l
65.4

9.8
694
.5

198000
5.9
17

62500

83400
268
96.3
49600

176000

95.2




200

130
6

6

12
29
8


28
J

J

JB


J
J















J

B


J


B
B


B
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR




-- R





2.5 JB

4 B




mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR




-- R





20 JB
14 J
27 JB
13 J


70
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR:
NR:
NR
NR
NR
NR
NFI
NR
Nit
NR
Nit
NR
Nit




-- K





2.5 JB

5 B




mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR




-- R





25 B

12 JB
14 J


53
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR




NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ug/l
133
27.3
3
5990
1.1

250000
13.6
21.2

131000
3.1
39300
1710
56.9
83100

124000
13.5
307


370
8400
--
870
580
230

410

590
3200
1700

1200
2900
JB
JB
J

JB



JB


J






J




J
R
B
JB
J

J


B
B


B

-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 18 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWRL06-02
OTR NUMBER: EDF99
ITR NUMBER: HEAC99
DATE SAMPLED: 7-27-89

1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - D i ch I orobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo [b] f I uroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N - N i t rosod i pheny I ami ne
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254

ug/l

37
1 J
5 J

180 J




78 B


2 J





44


9 J

.93 J
NOTES:
GH-GURL17-02 GH-GURL29-02 GH-GURW05-02* GH-GURU05-02* GH-FRGWRU05-02* GH-FRGURU05-02A* GH-FRGURU05-02B* GH-GURU10-02
EDF85 EDF86 EDF44 EDF48 (oil) EDF46 EDF47A (oil) EDF47B (oil) EOF57
MEAC85 MEAC86 MEAC44 MEAC48 MEAC46 MEAC47A MEAC47B MEAC57
7-26-89 7-26-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89 7-28-89
WML UIL WML UIL WML
ug/l ug/l mg/kg mg/kg Dig/kg mg/kg ing/kg ug/l

120
67
52

360 J




140 14 B
100



54



5 J

9 J
24


FR = Field replicate


358







50

42


12

16
33
105

71

16
43



J







J

J


J

J
J
J

J

J
J



273 J 20 J


800

720 J


17 JB

27 J
12 J



15 J
33 J
101 J 160
20 J
70 J

18 J
43 J

                                          FB = Field blank
                                           B = Blank contamination
                                           J = Estimated value
                                           R = Laboratory data not usable
                                           * = High concentration sample,  results  reported in mg/kg
                                          NR = Data not received
                                          NA = Not analyzed
                                          DL = Diluted sample
                                          RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                           D = Diluted result
                                          TB = Trip blank
                                         UIL = Water immiscible liquid
                                         WML = Water miscible liquid

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE  5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 19 of 24)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:


Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
GH-GURW11-02A*
EDF51A (oil)
MEAC51A
7-28-89
UIL
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
GH-GURU11-02B* GH-GURU14-02 GH-GURWU-02ROL GH-GURU21-02 GH-GURU22-02 GH-GURU23-02 GH-GURU24-02 GH-GURU24-02 DL
EDF51B (oil)
MEAC51B
7-28-89
WML
mg/kg
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
EDA79
MEAA79
7-26-89

U9/1
115 J

51.8
264


181000

5.7 J

25200

54300
110
15.9 JB
45200

107000

1160
EDA79 OL
NA
7-26-89

ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF58
MEAC58
7-28-89

ug/l
115 JB

51.7
268
.56 JB

92900


13.7 JB
7300
1.7 J
28200
119
34.5 J
30700

89000

71.3 B
EOF 91
MEAC91
7-27-89

u
-------
08-Mar-90
TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 20 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GWRW11-02A* GH-GWRU11-02B* GH-GURU14-02 GH-GURU14-02RDL GH-GURU21-02 GH-GURU22-02 GH-GURU23-02 GH-GURU24-02 GH-GURU24-02 DL
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:


1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzolb] f iuroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylph thai ate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254














EDF51A (oil) EDF51B (oil) EDA79
MEAC51A MEAC51B MEAA79
7-28-89 7-28-89 7-26-89
UIL WML
mg/kg tng/kg ug/l
6 J

78
497 J 11






12 J

363

2 J

702
19 J


1281 110
8 J
49 J
14

189 J 21 J
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample,
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted result
TB = Trip blank
WIL = Water immiscible liquid
WML = Water miscible liquid
EDA79 DL EDF58
NA HEAC58
7-26-89 7-28-89

ug/l ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 10 B
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 3 J
NA
NA





results reported in mg/kg








EDF91 EDF59 EDF92
MEAC91 MEACS9 MEAC92
7-27-89 7-28-89 7-27-89

ug/l ug/l ug/l


6 J
8 J 130
4 J

14



7 J
25 B 24 B 67 B
4 J 3 J

3 J 9 J

4 JB



34 480 J

4 J
6 J

1.5 J














EDF92 DL
NA
7-27-89

ug/l



94 D







73 DB


8 DJ

12 DJB



510 D




NA















-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page 21 of 24)
                 SAMPLE:   GH-GWRU30-02  GH-FRGURU30-02  GH-GUFB05-02  GH-GUFB06-02  GH-GUFB07-02  GH-GUFB08-02   GH-GUFB09-02  GH-GUFB10-02  GH-GUFB11-02
             OTR NUMBER:          EDA65           EDA66         EOA50         EOA69         EDA70         EOF83         EDF87         EDF69         EOF72
             ITR NUMBER:         MEAA65          MEAA66        MEAA50        MEAA69        NEAA70        MEAC83        MEAC87        MEAC69        MEAC72
           DATE SAMPLED:        7-25-89         7-25-89       7-24-89       7-25-89       7-25-89       7-26-89       7-26-89       7-27-89       7-27-89

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/l
41.9 J


33 JB


113000



61.2 JB

26600
13.5 JB

1370 J

80200

9.6 JB

ug/l



31.6 JB


115000



61.2 JB

27300
12.9 JB

1330 J

82400

7.3 JB

ug/l ug/l ug/l



6.6 J


156 J 199 J 3160 J


6.7 JB
22.5 JB 42.1 JB 45.9 JB

859 J

5.8 J


1920 J

5.6 JB 9.2 JB 2.1 JB
2 J
ug/ 1 ug/ 1




.5 JB

454 J 394 J


15.8 J
67.2 J

381 JB 165 JB


238 J



3.4 J 1.8 J

ug/l ug/l



8.9 J 8.8 J


324 J 193 J


11.9 J









3.8 JB 7.1 JB

1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
5  B
                4 JB
                              3 JB
                              2  J
3 BJ
2  J
4 BJ
4  J
3 JB
1  J
                                                                                    --  R
                                                                                     8  J
 2  J

36


20
                                                                                                  21  B
                                                                                                                14  B

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                     TABLE 5
                                                                                                                            (Page 22 of 24)
                 SAMPLE:
             OTR NUMBER:
             ITR NUMBER:
           DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GURU30-02
       EDA65
      MEAA65
     7-25-89
GH-FRGURU30-02
         EOA66
        MEAA66
       7-25-89
GH-GWFB05-02
       EDA50
      MEAA50
     7-24-89
GH-GUFB06-02
       EDA69
      MEAA69
     7-25-89
GH-GUFB07-02
       EDA70
      MEAA70
     7-25-89
GH-GUFB08-02
       EDF83
      MEAC83
     7-26-89
GH-GUFB09-02
       EOF87
      MEAC87
     7-26-89
GH-GUFB10-02
       EOF69
      MEAC69
     7-27-89
GH-GUFB11-02
       EOF72
      MEAC72
     7-27-89
                                   ug/l
                        ug/l
                        ug/l
                      ug/l
                      ug/l
                      ug/l
                      ug/l
                      ug/l
                      ug/l
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2-Methylnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanaline
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo[b]fluroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Oiethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylanrine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene

Aroclor-1254
                        3 JB
                        2  J
                                 NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                          FB = Field blank
                                           B = Blank contamination
                                           J - Estimated value
                                           R = Laboratory data not usable
                                           * = High concentration sample,
                                          NR = Data not received
                                          NA = Not analyzed
                                          DL = Diluted sample
                                          RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                           D = Diluted result
                                          TB = Trip blank
                                               results reported in ing/kg

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                       (Page  23 of 24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUFB12-02 GH-GUTB01-02 GH-GUTB02-02 GH-GUTB03-02 GH-GUTB04-02 GH-GWTB05-02 GH-GUTB06-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
EDF60
MEAC60
7-28-89
ug/l



3 J


268 J



36.1 JB

76.4 J
3 JB



526 JB


EDA71
NA
7-25-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDA72
NA
7-25-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF73
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF74
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF63
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EDF64
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chioroethane
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
              3  J
              3  J
1   J
1 BJ
4  J
                                         16   B
                                                      23  B

-------
08-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 5
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 24 of  24)
SAMPLE: GH-GUFB12-02 GH-GUTB01-02 GH-GUTB02-02 GH-GUTB03-02 GH-GWTB04-02 GH-GUTB05-02 GH-GUTB06-02
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2.4-Dimethylphenol
2-Hethytnapthalene
2-methylphenol
4-Chloroanal ine
4-Methylphenot
Acenaphthene
Benzoic acid
Benzo [b] f I uroanthene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethythexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butytphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1254


EDF60 EDA71
MEAC60 NA
EDA72
NA
7-28-89 7-25-89 7-25-89
ug/l ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6 J NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


EDF73
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


EDF74
NA
7-26-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


EDF63
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


EDF64
NA
7-27-89
ug/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


B = Blank contamination

J = Estimated value





                                           R = Laboratory data not usable
                                           * = High concentration sample, results reported in ing/kg
                                          NR = Data not received
                                          NA = Not analyzed
                                          DL = Diluted sample
                                          RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                           D = Diluted result
                                          TB = Trip blank

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 6
                                                                                                                                                      (Page 1  of 6)
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                               RI PHASE  III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                         MONITORING WELLS  - CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
SAMPLE :
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUGH01B-02
E19
7-25-89
GH-GUGH02B-02 GH-GUGH03B-02
E42
7-26-89
E07
7-24-89
GH-GUGH03C-02
E03
7-24-89
GH-GWGH08B-02
E41
7-26-89
GH-GUGH09A-02
E0!i
7-24-89
GH-GUGN09B-02
E04
7-24-89
GH-GUGH12B-02
E39
7-26-89
GH-GUGH14A-02
£40
7-26-89
(mg/l)
Oi I and Grease
BOD
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite

NA

22
6
.06 J
404
44
262
34 J
1 J

NOTES:

3
75
18

866
6
574
141 J
9.6 J

FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank


41
14

626
10
625
107 J
8.9 J



NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
2
113
58 J
0.18 J
634
12
590
110 J





103
24
1.05 J
673
9
546
88 J
16 J




68
15
0.37 J
702
18
477
133 J
8.4 J




42
3
.48 J
526
67
217
103 J
1.5 J




90
11
.32 J
1134
60
543
314 J

1.8

B = Blank contamination




J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed















-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
                                                                                                                                                    (Page 2 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH15B-02 GH-GUGH15C-02 GH-GUGH17A-02 GH-GUGH17B-02 GH-FRGUGH17B-02 GH-GUGH19A-02 GH-GUGH19B-02 GH-GUGH27A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E20
7-25-89
E21
7-25-89
E18 E16
7-25-89 7-25-89
E17 E50
7-25-89 7-27-89
E12 £15
7-25-89 • 7-25-89
(dig/ 1)
Oi t and Grease
BOD
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sutfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite

2
23
4
.28 J
413
45
194
83 J



6
34
7
.11 J
295
8
221
48 J
.4 J


2 3
9
2
.07 J
670 305
45 39
262 177
204 J 30 J

.5

3
24
6
.1 J
302 696
39 85
176 303
30 J 138 J

.2

7
6 18
5
.11 J .08 J
340 490
58 51
237 286
55 J 81 J

.3
                               NOTES:    FR  =  Field replicate
                                        FB  =  Field blank
                                         B  =  Blank contamination
                                         J  =  Estimated value
                                        NA  =  Not  analyzed

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 6
                                                                                                                                                     (Page 3 of 6)
             SAMPLE:    GH-GUGH28A-02   GH-GUGH28B-02   GH-GUGH29A-02   GH-GUGH29B-02   GH-GUGH30A-02   GH-FRGUGHJOA-02    GH-GWGH30B-02   GH-GUGH31A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOD
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkal inity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
E22
7-25-89



27
5
.07 J
497
79
218
82 J

.2
E25 E32
7-25-89 7-25-89


2
14 64
6
.05 J .52 J
385 616
58 74
163 360
61 J 85 J
1.1 J

E33
7-25-89


2
33
5
.23 J
374
50
200
41 J


E30
7-25-89


4
198
38
1.96 J
1048
13
986
127 J
20 J

E31
7-25-89


4
194
:ss
1.97 J
1133
12
974
109 J
21 J

E29
7-25-89


5
103
33
.18 J
1128
9
824
139 J
20 J

E35
7-26-89



82
16
.21 J
1128
24
875
183 J
23 J

                               NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                        FB = Field blank
                                         B = Blank contamination
                                         J = Estimated value
                                        NA = Not analyzed

-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 6
                                                                                                                                                     (Page 4 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-FRGUGH31A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E36
7-26-89
GH-GUGH31B-02 GH-GWGH33A-02 GH-FRGUGH33A-02 GH-GWGH34A-02 GH-GUGH34B-02 GH-GUGH36A-02 GH-GUGH36B-02
E37
7-26-89
E46
7-27-89
E47 E06
7-27-89 7-24-89
E09 E13 E14
7-24-89 7-25-89 7-25-89
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOO
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite



82
18
.45 J
1118
23
844
187 J
21 J

NOTES:


129
27
.79 J
1332
20
1075
242 J
41 J

FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank

4
NA
NA
.28 J
858
2
638
134 J
28 J



4
70 33
22 11
.3 J .13 J
890 682
2 48
640 443
142 J 92 J
25 J 3.7 J




11 36 10
3 7
1.08 J
340 1780 1582
43 83 77
204 334 206
33 J 719 J 555 J
.15 J .15 J


B = Blank contamination




J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed







-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 6
                                                                                                                                                      (Page 5 of  6)
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH37A-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E26
7-25-89
GH-GUGH40B-02 GH-GWGH43A-02 GH-GWGH43B-02 GH-GUGH44A-02 GH-GUGH45A-02 GH-GURD24-02 GH-FRGURD24-02
E38
7-26-89
EOS
7-24-89
E02
7-24-89
E01 E11 E48
7-24-89 7-25-89 7-27-89
E49
7-27-89
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOO
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
TOS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite

6
5
651
37
.72 J
788
17
654
119 J
5.9 J

NOTES:

4
86
25
.13 J
876
4
703
137 J
25 J

FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank

2
26
9
.08 J
520
13
378
58 J
5.3 J



3
46
15
.08 J
824
9
524
168 J
.25 J



3
79 19 41
23 5 6
.1 J ,3 J .35 J
806 606 376
5 110 29
587 471 242
129 J 1114 J 27 J
26 J 7.8 J .4 J



3
37
6
.2 J
382
30
239
42 J
.45 J


B = Blank contamination




J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed









-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 6
(Page 6 of 6)
             SAMPLE:    GH-GURL17-02   GH-GWRW14-02   GH-GURU24-02   GH-GURU30-02   GH-FRGURU30-02   GH-GUFB05-02   GH-GWFB06-02   GH-GUFB07-02   GH-GWFB08-02
SAS NUMBER 4733:
DATE SAMPLED:
E44
7-26-89
E34
7-26-89
E45 E23 E24 E10 E27 E28 E43
7-27-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-24-89 7-25-89 7-25-89 7-26-89
(mg/l)
Oil and Grease
BOO
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
TDS
Sulfate
Alkalinity
Chloride
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite

8
8
H5
18

818
52
521
111 J
16 J

NOTES:

6
143
45

16
13
290 22 22
52 5 4
2.5 J 0.25 J .25 J
1010 1056 656 644
2
238
167 J
26 J

FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
10 65 64
935 315 312
102 J 138 J 138 J
32 J
1.7 1.6

B = Blank contamination




J = Estimated value
NA = Not analyzed



-------
03-Jan-90
                                                                                  TABLE 7
                                                                                G&H LANDFILL
                                                                   R! PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                                SURFACE WATER
                                                                                                                                                              (Page  1  of  1)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-SU01-02* GH-SU02-02* GH-SW03-02* GH-SW04-02* GH-SW05-02* GH-FRSW05-02* GH-SW06-02* GH-FRSU06-02* GH-FBSU03-02*
EDF21 (oil) EDF22 EDF23 (oil) EDF24 EDF25 (oil) EDFJS8 EDF26 EDF27 EDF28
HEAC21 (oil) MEAC22 MEAC23 (oil) MEAC24 MEAC25 (oil) MEAC38 MEAC26 MEAC27 MEAC28
8-01-89 8-01-89 8-01-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-IJ9 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg)
Acetone
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
2-methy I naphthalene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Pent ach I orob i pheny I
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Tetrachlorobiphenyl
Aroclor-1254






2.5 JB 2.5 JB
2.5 JB 2.5 JB

1 J
11 J

567
48 J
48 J

60 J
78 J

60 J
526 J
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable

2.5 JB 2.5 JB
2.5 JB 2.5 JB
1 J
7
19 J
1812
582
505
48 J

60 J
73 J


475 J






2.5 JB
2.5 JB
1 J
6 J
19 J
1823
574
501
43 J


77 J


443 J





• 5 JB
3 B 2.5 JB 2.5 JB 2.5 JB
3 JB 2.5 JB 4 JB
2 J
7
17 J
2680
780
487
49
23 J

75 J
23 J

445 J





                                 = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg

                              Data for inorganic analyte analysis has not been received.

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                  TABLE 8
                                                                                                                                                             (Page 1  of  1)
                                                                                G&H LANDFILL
                                                                   RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                               LEACHATE WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-LL01-01 GH-FRLL01-01
OTR NUMBER: EDF29 EDF32
ITR NUMBER: MEAC29 MEAC32
DATE SAMPLED: 7-31-89 7-31-89
GH-LL01-02
EDF34
MEAC34
8-01-89
GH-LL02-01 GH-LL02-01 RE
EDF30 EDF30 RE
MEAC30 NA
7-31-89 7-31-89
GH-LL02-02
EDF35
MEAC35
8-01-69
GH-LL03-01
EDF31
MEAC31
7-31-89
GH-LL03-02 GH-FBLL04-01 GH-LLTB06-01
EDF37 EDF33 EDF45
MEAC37 MEAC33 NA
8-01-89 8-01-89 8-01-89
(ug/t)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Si Iver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Acetone
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
A -methyl phenol
Benzole acid





5020 5960
50.5 J 62
32.9 25.5
376 383
.46 JB
166000 176000
16.2 24.8
50.7 50.7
22.6 J 21.2 J
28700 30200
10 B 11.3 B
74300 76600
691 712
33 J 39 J
52400 53400


151000 152000
.4 JB
25.6 J 28.6 J
59.2 B 65.1

4 J 3 J


8 J



NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
6630
63.9
33.8
380
.46
169000
22.8
33.8
17.2
30200
13.3
75200
695
32.1
52300

2.5
149000

29.4
62.5
9
5

4
3












JB


J
J

B


J


J


J

JB
J

BJ
J








3960
88.3
39.7
230

265000
18.8
60.8
19.3 J
48200
9 B
140000
811
41.5
66600


199000
.5 JB
13.1 JB
1310
26 JB
21 J
17 J

12 J
15 J
70
170





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
23 JB
22 J
16 J

5 J
15 J
NA
NA





4050
69.9
35.6
218
.68 JB
265000
19.9
43.9 J
17.7 J
47000
9.8 B
140000
786
46.4
67000
.6 JB

200000

13.3 JB
1290

30
19


16
54
110





4170
77.1
21.2
713
.35 JB
1i 59000
38.2

22.3 J
41800
18.4
166000
685
67.2
222000
1.9 JB

454000
.4 JB
11 JB
58.7 B




8








3050 126 JB
81.1
21.4
738
.65 JB
166000 272 JB
27.2

17.2 J
39400
13.5 B 2.7 JB
184000 37.5 J
615
61.7 5.2 J
225000
1.3 JB

470000 825 JB
.7 JB 1.1 JB
9.5 JB
46.4 B 12.1 JB

4 J


5








NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10 J


4 BJ


NA
NA





R = Laboratory data not usable



TB = Trip blank
RE = Sample reanalyzed
NA = Not analyzed

























-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                  TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                          (Page 1 of 14)
                                                                               G&H  LANDFILL
                                                                   RI PHASE  III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         TEST PIT  -  SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease

1 , 1 , 2, 2- Tetrach I oroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobemene
Chloroform
GH-TP01-01
EAG93
MEAA19
E18
5-19-89
(ing/kg)
5130 J
299 J
15.7
8040 J

54.3
12100
9840
40.5
4980 J
146
98200 J
42200 J
4260
1900 J
188
199
433 J
3.8 J
1 JB
1450

21
9670 J
333000 J
(ug/kg)





71000
180000 J

1800000 J

41000

10000 JB

GH-TP01-01 DL
EAG93 DL
NA
NA
5-19-89
(dig/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)






320000 JBD





220000 JBD

GH-TP02-01 GH-TP02-01 DL
EAG76 EAG76 DL
MEAA02 NA
E04 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
< ing/ kg)
3390
0.79
5
30.4

0.51
65100
14.4
2.1
68.5

6790
33.7
8950
161

12.1
498

1.9
113

12.6
91.3
10200
J
J

J

J


J
J

J
J

J


J

B
J


J
J
(ug/kg)






20000


4900

470
2200
380






J


JB

J
B
J
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)






4400 JBD





23000 DB

GH-TP02-02 GH-TP02-02 DL
EAG77 EAG77 DL
MEAA03 NA
E05 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
(mg/kg)
4540 J
-- R
4.8
71.4 J

0.88
50400
13.6
2.5 J
35.8 J

10700 J
93;2 J
9260
225 J

16.6
647 J

1.1 JB
156 J

12.9
480 J
2660 J
(ug/kg)





43000 J
19000 J

8500
5600 JB
810
390 J
2300 B

(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)





40000 D
3700 JBD





22000 DB

GH-TP04-01
NA
NA
E01
5-15-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6020 J
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-TP04-02
EAG74
MEAAOO
E02
5-15-89
(mg/kg)
7290
19.3
5.6
879

1.4
56700
26.9
7.4
77.8

19800
143
9540
618

27.3
1490
.39

299

24.3
453
21300
J
J

J




J
J

J
J

J



J

J


J
J
(ug/kg)






22000



4000
530
2100







J




J
B

GH-TP05-01
EAG85
MEAA11
EOS
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
2980 J
.92 J
3.4
95.6 J

1.1
79300
36
3.1 J
43.6 J

10300 J
205 J
15900
276 J

22.6
341 J


111 J

11.8
516 J
35600 J
(ug/kg)






17000 JB



8500

12000 B


-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                          (Page 2 of 14)
                                                                               G&H LANDFILL
                                                                   RI PHASE ill ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                        TEST PIT - SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichlocoethene
Xylene (total)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methy (naphthalene
2-Hethylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl .phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [1 , 2 , 3 - cd] pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254




GH-TP01-01
EAG93
MEAA19
E18
5-19-89
(ug/kg)
3400000 J
48000 B

SOOOOO J
7000000 J
2200000 J
7900000 J


180000








1300000 JB
160000 B


16000 JB

51000 JB
17000 J


23000 J
530000
27000 J
60000
15000 JB


NOTES:



GH-TP01-01 DL GH-TP02-01
EAG93 DL EAG76
NA MEAA02
NA E04
5-19-89 5-16-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
6300000 DJ 140000 J
950 B

930000 D
15000000 DJ 170000 J
3100000 D
19000000 DJ 280000 J


180000 JD

160 J






1500000 DB 120 JB
170000 B


580 BJ

55000 JBD
17000 JD 37 J



570000 D 84 J
26000 JD
80000 JD 150 J
15000 JBD 59 JB


FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
GH-TP02-01 DL
EAG76 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
110000 D



200000 D

310000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DL
D
RE
NA
GH-TP02-02 GH-TP02-02 DL
EAG77
MEAA03
EOS
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
120000 J
3600 B

1000
170000 J
110000 J
230000 J


110000 J
200000 J







49000 JB
82000 J


25000 JB

47000 JB




95000 J
5900 J
42000 J



= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
EAG77 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
110000 D
12000 JBD


230000 D
100000 D
290000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


GH-TP04-01
NA
NA
E01
5-15-89
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


GH-TP04-02
EAG74
MEAAOO
E02
5-15-89
(ug/kg)
4800
1300 B


3400
320 J
12000 J


2400 J








8800 JB


1500 J
21000 JB






5900 J


4700 JB




GH-TP05-01
EAG85
MEAA11
E08
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
260000



350000 J
11000
710000 J


10000 J









6900 JB




4800 JB




15000 J

22000 J
3900 JB




= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed




R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results


reported in mg/kg wet
weight






-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                 TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                         (Page 3 of  U)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oi 1 & Grease

1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
GH-TP05-01DL
EAG85 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)






150000 JBD





160000 JBD

GH-TP06-01
EAG79
HEAA05
E07
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
2800 J
4 J
5.2
5390 J

2.3
64700
170
6.7 J
893 J
1.5
14400 J
3370 J
19500
211 J
0.21
28.1
373 J

1.5 JB
366 J

11.6
3680 J
100000 J
(ug/kg)





1800000
91000 JB





150000 B

GH-TP06-01 DL
EAG79 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)





15000000 D
140000 JBD





250000 JBD

GH-TP07-01
EAG78
MEAA04
E06
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
5660 J
1.1 J
5.8
437 J

42.9
65500
28.4
6.2 J
93 J

32700 J
431 J
12900
405 J

19.8
844

.87 JB
405 J

15
696 J
337 JB
(ug/kg)





1900
13000 J


1600 JB

370 J
1200 B
260 J
GH-TP08-01
EAG75
MEAA01
E03
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
6950
17.4
5.7
843

36.4
28200
82
14.9
284

28500
1020
6570
412
1.1
324
819
3.7
11.5
582

18.4
1970
24600
J
J

J





J

J
J

J


J
J

J


J
J
(ug/kg)





550000
7700



86000

15000






J
JB





B

GH-TP08-01 DL
EAG75 DL
NA
NA
5-16-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)





690000 0
150000 JBD





190000 JBD

GH-TP09-01 GH-TP09-01 DL
EAG83 EAG83 DL
MEAA09 NA
E09 NA
5-17-89 5-17-89
(mg/kg)
3760
38.7
5.3
6490

42.9
89300
534
32.8
262
9.6
140000
2920
62800
1370
.3
174
210
20

445

30.7
1450
58900
J
J

J





J

J
J

J


J
J

J


J
J
(ug/kg)

93000

7700
42000
90000
120000

480000
19000
32000

11000







J

J
JB


B

(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)






300000 JBD





150000 JBD

GH-TP10-01
EDA11
MEAA37
E52
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
4240

3.1
23.6 J


96000
8.2
3.8 J
21.4

8980
14.5 J
19700
367 J

7.8 J
382 J


161 J
.59 J
17.9
30.2
143 JB
(ug/kg)






11 B


53 JB


5 JB


-------
06-Har-90
                                                                                 TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                          (Page 4 of  U)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery 1 ene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-buty I phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254






GH-TP05-01DL
EAG85 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
420000 D
130000 JBD


730000 D

1400000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:





GH-TP06-01 GH-TP06-01 DL GH-TP07-01
EAG79 EAG79 DL
MEAA05 NA
E07 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
2600000 2300000 D
130000 JB 170000 JBD


6500000 J 6100000 D
280000 320000 D
7800000 J 7000000 D
NA
NA
41000 J NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
94000 B NA
45000 B NA
NA
NA
8500 JB NA
NA
22000 JB NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
93000 NA
5000 J NA
NA
3300 JB NA
11000 NA
59000 NA
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample.
EAG78
MEAA04
E06
5-16-89
(ug/kg)
1900
880 B


6100
4100
3600


37 J

180 J






240 JB



430 BJ

170 BJ




190 J

110 J
52 JB


DL
D
RE
NA

results
GH-TP08-01 GH-TP08-01 DL
EAG75 EAG75 DL
MEAA01 NA
E03 NA
5-16-89 5-16-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
1200000 J 1400000 D
10000 JB 150000 JBD


3600000 J 5200000 D
27000
2200000 J 3000000 D
NA
NA
50000 J NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
46000 JB NA
50000 JB NA
NA
NA
12000 JB NA
NA
120000 B NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
130000 NA
4400 J . NA
NA
5600 JB NA
54000 NA
36000 NA
= Diluted sample
= Di luted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed


GH-TP09-01
EAG83
MEAA09
E09
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
1200000 J
25000 B

6000 J
3100000 J
600000 J
2900000 J


180000 J

35000 J






260000 JB
330000 J


30000 JB

140000 JB




250000 J

64000 J


18000






GH-TP09-01 DL
EAG83 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
1500000 D
120000 JBD


4800000 D
620000 D
5100000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






GH-TP10-01
EDA11
MEAA37
E52
5-25-89
(ug/kg)
4 JB
21 B


9 JB

2 J


230 J














67 JB
















reported in mg/kg wet weight

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                 TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                          (Page 5 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-TP11-01 GH-TP11-01 DL
EAG82 EAG82 DL
HEAA08 NA
E12 NA
5-17-89 5-17-89
(mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease
3270
8.7
10.3
10200

8.2
72000
405
51.8
155
4
39600
1810
37800
441
1.6
118
682
1.7

729

37.4
1740
138000
J
J

J





J

J
J

J


J
J

J


J
J
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch loroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
A-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform





83000
120000

160000
40000
61000

14000
12000






J


JB


B

(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)






300000 JBD





170000 JBD

GH-TP12-01
EAG81
MEAA07
E11
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
6410 J
-- R
3.4
40.1 J


18900
39.2
5.2 J
11.7 J

10600 J
41.9 J
8120
130 J

18.7
535 J

.95 JB
136 J

18.6
64.4 J
9850 J
(ug/kg)






18000 J


3800 JB
800
440 J
1600 B
330 J
GH-TP12-01DL
EAG81 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)






4600 JBD





2900 DB

GH-TP13-01
EAG90
MEAA16
E14
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
2040 J
-- R
4
17.9 J


46200
9.6
3.1 J
6.6 J

7030 J
15.1 J
11500
181 J

6.2 J
152 J

.67 JB
109 J

10.4
21.2 J
11500 J
(ug/kg)





40000






7500 JB

GH-FRTP13-01
EAG96
MEAA22
E15
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
1740 J
-- R
4.8
23.2 J

.84
47600
22.5
4.6 J
20.2 J

23700 J
31.5 J
13200
420 J

19.1



117 J

8.8
29.2 J
5270 J
< ug/kg>





55000






6800 BJ

GH-TP14-01 GH-TP14-01 DL
EAG97 EAG97 DL
MEAA23 NA
E13 NA
5-18-89 5-18-89
(mg/kg)
1540
5.5
40.5
478

21
7820
1200
66.9
801
2.6
496000
1990
3740
15900

574



5340

70.1
357
97000
J
J

J





J

J
J

J








J
J
(ug/kg)












7200













JB

(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)












21000 JBD

GH-TP15-01
EAG80
MEAA06
E10
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
2680 J
1.3 J
1.5 J
1110 J

.86 J
15400
99.6
8.7 J
41.1 J
5.5
5860 J
465 J
5690
102 J
.51
494
616 J

1.2 JB
325 J

38.6
7030 J
70700 J
(ug/kg)










190000 J

14000 JB


-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                     (Page 6 of  U)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Ethytbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methy (naphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k]f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl ph thai ate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-biitylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254





GH-TP11-01
EAG82
MEAA08
E12
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
1600000 J
93000 B


2800000 J
190000
3300000 J


250000


8300 J





180000 B
41000 JB
8100 J
8800 J
18000 JB

45000 JB
13000 J
13000 J


560000
32000 J
33000 J
16000 JB

54000
NOTES:




GH-TP11-01 DL GH-TP12-01 GH-TP12-01DL
EAG82 DL EAG81
NA MEAA07
NA E11
5-17-89 5-17-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
1600000 D 14000
280000 DB 810 B


3300000 D 34000 J
190000 D
4300000 D 46000 J
NA
NA
NA 2300 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 7000 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA 5500 JB
NA
NA 2700 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 2100 J
NA
NA 6800 J
NA 1800 JB
NA
NA 7500
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
EAG81 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
11000 D
1500 JBD


37000 D

41000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DL
D
RE
NA

GH-TP13-01 GH-FRTP13-01
EAG90 EAG96
MEAA16 MEAA22
E14 E15
5-18-89 5-18-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
37000 17000
3200 JB


5300 JB

27000 12000


470 J 4900 J












430 JB 5800 JB

3000 JB



170 J
2100 22000 J

98 JB



= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed

GH-TP14-01 GH-TP14-01 DL
EAG97
MEAA23
E13
5-18-89
(ug/kg)
230000



11000 B
6100 J
700000 J
7200 J
24000 J
36000 J












5800 JB





17000 J
150000




180000





EAG97 DL
NA
NA
5-18-89
(ug/kg)
320000 DJ





790000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





GH-TP15-01
EAG80
MEAA06
E10
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
530000 J



1800000 J
15000 J
1400000 J


9000 J








62000 B
8800 JB


11000 JB

8700 JB




25000 J


3600 JB

27000 J





* = High concentration sample, results


reported in mg/kg wet weight






-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                 TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                         (Page 7 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1, 2 -Dich I oroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
GH-TP15-01DL
EAG80 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)






150000 JBD



150000 D

93000 JBD

GH-TP15-01RE
EAG80 RE
NA
NA
5-17-89
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)










190000 J

12000 JB

GH-TP16-01
EAG95
MEAA21
E16
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
2330 J
-- R
3.6
6.4 J


71800
6.6
2.2 J
5 J

5170 J
4.8 J
14600
133 J
.09
4.9 J
322 J

.59 JB
123 J

7.8
17.7 J
142 JB
(ug/kg)






4400 J





610 JB

GH-TP17-01
EAG94
MEAA20
E17
5-18-89
(mg/kg)
2130 J
-- R
5.1
18 J


116000
6
4.2 J
5.1 J

5120 J
5.5 J
21400
180 J

4.8 J
710 J

.79 JB
184 J

6.5 J
18.6 J
1390 J
(ug/kg)






6300 J


1100 JB

380 J
620 JB

GH-TP18-01
EAG92
MEAA18
E19
5-19-89
(mg/kg)
2780
--
5.1
13.7

.43
98600
8.7
3.1
10.6
.79
8480
28.1
20500
233

7.6
496


168

9.4
58.1
295000
J
R

J

J


J
J

J
J

J


J


J


J
J
(ug/kg)

*










5600













JB

GH-TP19-01
EDA10
MEAA36
E20
5-19-89
(mg/kg)
3410 J
.77 J
4.4
9.1 J


67700
7.4
3.4 J
73.4 J

5460 J
16.6 J
15900
168 J

7.9
472 J

.92 JB
123 J

7.1 J
40.2 J
4840 J
(ug/kg)






4300 J





670 JB

GH-TP20-01
EDAOO
MEAA26
E22
5-22-89
(mg/kg)
1520

2.1 J
55.3


59300
8.6
2.6 J
6.1
42.6
4500
10.7 J
10300
137 J

6.8 J



74.6 J

5.8 J
38.7
51600 J
(ug/kg)






3100 J





390 JB

GH-TP21-01
EDA02
MEAA28
E31
5-22-89
(mg/kg)
3430

1.9
38.6


40800
13.8
3.3
7.4

6500
33.9
9310
152

7.1
251


252

12.2
34.7
4270


J
J




J



J

J

J
J


J



J
(ug/kg)






3700





410







J





JB

GH-TP22-01
EDA05
MEAA31
E33
5-23-89
(mg/kg)
2430

2.7
23.5 J


59900
8.7
2.7 J
9.7

5730
35.7 J
14000
164 J

8.1 J
314 J


115 J

9.4 J
46
364 J
(ug/kg)









37 B


8 B


-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                          (Page 8 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a)pyrene
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo tgh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k) fluoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
I ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254







GH-TP15-01DL
EAG80 DL
NA
NA
5-17-89
(ug/kg)
440000 D
100000 DB


1700000 D

1300000 D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:






GH-TP15-01RE GH-TP16-01 GH-TP17-01
EAG80 RE EAG9S EAG94
NA MEAA21 MEAA20
NA E16 E17
5-17-89 5-18-89 5-18-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
530000 J 3400
930 B 990 B


1700000 J 850 B 1000 B
22000 J
1500000 J 700 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 140 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 110 JB 390 JB
NA 88 JB
NA
NA
NA 300 JB 540 JB
NA
NA 90 JB 230 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 59 J 620 J
NA
NA 210 JB 130 BJ
NA 49 JB
NA
NA
FR = Field replicate DL
FB = Field blank D
B = Blank contamination RE
J = Estimated value NA
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in mg/kg wet weight
GH-TP18-01 GM-TP19-01 GH-TP20-01
EAG92 EDA10 EDAOO
MEAA18 MEAA36 MEAA26
E19 E20 E22
5-19-89 5-19-89 5-22-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
4700 J 4200
980 B 590 JB


9300 B 2600 3800

3100 J 13000


3300 J 4700 J








160 JB



5700 JB 290 JB

2300 JB 77 JB




3800 J
5500 J
3700 J
58 JB 2600 JB

13000 8800
= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed



GH-TP21-01 GH-TP22-01
EDA02 EDA05
MEAA28 MEAA31
E31 E33
5-22-89 5-23-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
16000
620 JB 27 JB


3900 13

29000 J











11000 JB 170 BJ





97 BJ







1300 JB 38 JB










-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                  TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                           (Page 9 of  14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-TP23-01
EDA03
MEAA29
E32
5-23-89
(mg/kg)

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oi 1 & Grease

13000

1.8
986
.53
2.1
47700
44.7
11.5
48.4

20200
31
9750
750

34.4
1150


195

32.6
698
14800



J

J



J



J

J


J


J



J
(ug/kg)

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene '
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Ch I orobenzene
Chloroform







19000





490








J





JB

GH-TP24-01 GH-TP24-01 DL
EDA04 EDA04 DL
MEAA30 NA
E34 NA
5-23-89 5-23-89
(mg/kg)

4880

2.9
2930

5.5
54700
59.7
12.6
104
1.4
49000
2130 J
7460
552 J
.18
45.7
351 J


196 J

22.8
2780
7460 J
(ug/kg)











30 J

8 B

(mg/kg)

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)







18 JBD


94 JBD
58 DJ

22 JBD

GH-TP25-01 GH-FRTP25-01 GH-FRTP25-01 RE
EDA13 EDA06 EDA06 RE:
MEAA39 MEAA32 N/l
E35 E36 NA
5-23-89 5-23-89 5-23-89
(mg/kg)

1710

1 J
7.4 J


45200
6.7
2.5 J
3.5 J

4480
5.2 J
8890
175 J

4.5 J
248 J


66.8 J

8.9 J
21.7
33000 J
(ug/kg)







6600 J



620 J

650 JB

(mg/kg)

2650

1.3
32.4


38200
19.5
4.8
15

7260
3.9
8560
155

7.3



86.3

11.5
210
27100



J
J




J



J

J

J



J



J
(ug/kg)







26000



1100

580








J



J

JB

(mg/kg:i

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)







6100 J



790 J

590 JB

GH-TP26-01
EDA08
MEAA34
E38
5-24-89
(mg/kg)

1830

1.5 J
9 J


35700
5.2

3.5 J

4410
8.1 J
8410
125 J

13.2
372 J


74.8 J

8.8 J
21.2
66100 J
(ug/kg)







28000 J





590 BJ

GH-TP26-01* GH-TP26-01* LIQUID
EDA22 NA
NA MEAA40 L
NA NA
5-24-89 5-24-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1500 JB
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
(mg/kg wet
weight)
234 J


9.6 J


785 JB
6 J

11.2 J

183 J
61.2 J

7.2 J

1640 J


-- R



760 J
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

-------
06-Har-90
TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                           (Page 10 of H)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
1TR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:


Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 , 2 - D i ch 1 orobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a)pyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzotghilperylene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-buty I phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254







GH-TP23-01 GH-TP24-01 GH-TP24-01 DL GH-TP25-01
EDA03 EDA04 EDA04 DL EDA13
HEAA29 MEAA30 NA MEAA39
E32 E34 NA E35
5-23-89 5-23-89 5-23-89 5-23-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)

22 12 DJ 7500
1500 B 68 JB 89 JBD 590 JB
3 J
3 J
5600 570 J 460 DJ 16000
510 J
130 12 DJ 12000
NA
NA
130 J NA 15000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 7500
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in ma/kg wet weight
GH-FRTP25-01 GH-FRTP25-01 RE
EDA06
MEAA32
E36
5-23-89
(ug/kg)

9000 J
1100 JB


19000 J
500 J
13000 J


7300 J
























8400
DL = Diluted sample
D = Di luted result
RE = Sample reanalyzed
NA = Not analyzed



EDA06 RE
NA
NA
5-23-89
(ug/kg)

8500 J
560 JB


18000 J
390 J
22000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA







GH-TP26-01
EDA08
MEAA34
E38
5-24-89
(ug/kg)

1300
860 B


7100

2500
-- R
-- R
870 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
360 J
-- R
-- R
-- R

2100 J







GH-TP26-01*
EDA22
NA
NA
5-24-89
(ing/kg wet
weight)
-- R
460 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R











7 J
14 J






















GH-TP26-01* LIQUID
NA
MEAA40 L
NA
5-24-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA








-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                  TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                           (Page 11  of  U)
SAMPLE: GH-TP26-01* SOLID
OTR NUMBER: NA
ITR NUMBER: MEAA40 S
SAS NUMBER: NA
DATE SAMPLED: 5-24-89
(mg/kg wet
GH-TP27-01
EAG88
MEAA14
E45
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-FRTP27-01
EAG89
MEAA15
E46
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP28-01
EAG98
MEAA24
E47
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP28-01DL
EAG98DL
NA
NA
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP29-01 GH-TP29-01DL
EAG86 EAG86DL
MEAA12 NA
E41 NA
5-24-89 5-24-89
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
GH-TP30-01
EAG84
HEAA10
E40
5-24-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP31-01
EDA09
MEAA35
E39
5-24-89
(mg/kg)
weight)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oil & Grease
5500


58.4
1.2

1890
55.6
10.8
40

3160
60
1630
36
.4
10900


--


38.4
3700
NA
J


J
J

J
J
J
J


J
J
J




R


J
J

(mg/kg wet
3090

3.9
295


54100
7.1
4.1
3.1

7640
12.4
16600
332

8.2
603


96.9
.75
12.5
25.3
1790








J
J


J

J

J
J


J
J


J
(ug/kg)
6680

3.9
1040


62800
12.5
8.2 J
14.1

13700
15.7 J
20300
641 J

15.8
1060 J


132 J

21.8
49.3
52.3 JB
(ug/kg)
306


52.3

4.7
5060
7

11.9
1.2
6150
27.6 J
318 J
76.6 J


135 J


56.8 J

1.6 J
993
26300 J
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
3620

5.3 J
307

9.8
19100
146
37.7
478
1.4
45200
413 J
90SO
642 J
.49
226
881 J


748 J

31.7
857
35000 J
(u<|/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
2920

5
57.8


73800
10.3
3.5 J
22.7

7530
40.3 J
17600
304 J

29.6
203 J


70.7 J

11.4
210
2110 J
(ug/kg)
2110

1.2 J
19.6 J


39900
6.4
2.6 J
2.6 J

5050
11.4 J
10700
154 J

5.2 J
475 J


76.4 J

9.9 J
21.2
37700 J
(ug/kg)
weight)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Oichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA














560





4900
1200
750
1300
--

--

J





J
J
J
JB
R

R













6 JB







-- R













9100 JBD


14000 JBD
-- R

-- R







19000 J



1400 J

440 JB







-- R













25000 J





480 JB






750
23000 J





710 BJ


-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                           (Page 12 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:


Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 , 2-D i ch 1 orobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-buty I phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254







GH-TP26-01* SOLID
NA
MEAA40 S
NA
5-24-89
(dig/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:






GH-TP27-01 GH-FRTP27-01 GH-TP28-01
EAG88 EAG89 EAG98
MEAA14 HEAA15 MEAA24
E45 E46 E47
5-25-89 5-25-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)

750 J 6 JB 380000 J
1100 JB 21 B 1100 B
-- R

1100 JB 7 JB 66000 J

1200 J 7 J 640000 J


8600 J














2600 JB



150 J
100 J 370 J 63000





FR = Field replicate DL
FB = Field blank D
B = Blank contamination RE
J - Estimated value NA
R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results
reported in cng/kg wet weight
GH-TP28-01DL GH-TP29-01
EAG98DL EAG86
NA MEAA12
NA E41
5-25-89 5-24-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)

230000 DJ 35000 J
720 B
-- R

42000 DJ 11000

400000 DJ 81000 J
NA
NA
NA 10000 J
NA
NA
NA 3900 J
NA
NA 11000 J
NA 17000 J
NA 7000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 13000 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 5700 JB
NA 16000 J
NA
NA 7900 J
NA
NA 45000 J
NA 13000 J
NA
NA 18000 J
NA
NA
= Diluted sample
= Diluted result
= Sample reanalyzed
= Not analyzed



GH-TP29-01DL
EAG86DL
NA
NA
5-24-89
(ug/kg)

42000 DJ



15000 DJ

98000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA







GH-TP30-01 GH-TP31-01
EAG84 EDA09
MEAA10 MEAA35
E40 E39
5-24-89 5-24-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)

1500
880 B 810 B


1100 B 2900

11000 3300


1500 17000 J














6000 JB




2400
440 J












-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                  TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                          (Page 13 of 14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-TP32-01 GH-TP32-01 DL
EAG99 EDG99 DL
MEAA25 NA
E49 NA
5-25-89 5-25-89
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
GH-TP33-01
EAG87
MEAA13
E48
5-25-89
(mg/kg)
GH-TP33-01*
EDA23
MEAA41
NA
5-25-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Oi 1 & Grease
2430

3.1
19.6


106000
14
4.7
6.8
36
6170
19
12500
213

15.1
441


126

10
158
8530



J




J



J

J


J


J

J

J
(ug/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)
4560

1.5 J
88.5

1.9
51600
34.5
4.8 J
38.1
1.4
10100
1930 J
13300
299 J

11.8
498 J


116 J

15.9
169
16600 J
(ug/kg)
20300


322

6.4
37300
47.2

36.4

11100
363
8760
210

37.2


--
3820

26.4
372
NA
J




J
J
J

J



J


J


R
J

J
J

(mg/kg wet
weight)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform





34000
4500


800
--

--






J
J


JB
R

R







6600 JBD


18000 JBD
-- R

-- R






110000
-- R









6

12
630
36

820
56
14







J
J


J
J




GH-TP33-01DL*
EDA23 DL
NA
NA
5-25-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)





700 D
-- R

1100 D
830 JBD




GH-TP35-01
EDA07
MEAA33
E37
5-24-89
(mg/kg)

1930

1.6
6.6


66000
6.1
2.6
2.7

6130
2.1
13800
190

5.4
294


102

8.5
25.4
336



J
J




J
J


J

J

J
J


J

J

J
(ug/kg)







6





6








JB





B

GH-TP36-01 GH-FBTP01-01 GH-FBTP02-01
EDA01 EAG91 EDA12
MEAA27 MEAA17 MEAA38
E23 E21 E53
5-22-89 5-19-89 5-25-89
(mg/kg)

1940

2 J
7.7 J


103000
6.6
2.5 J
4.7 J

5000
10.8 J
21900
246 J

4.8 J



101 J

8.1 J
17
15300 J
(ug/kg)







3300 J





470 JB

(mg/kg) (mg/kg)

57.1 J 32.3 J
-- R

-- R





-- R

53.2 J 36.8
1.7 J .48 J




206 J

.64 JB



.86 J
39.5 JB 54 J
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)







2 JB


18 J


6 JB 4 JB


-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 9
                                                                                                                                                          (Page 14  of  14)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:


Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 , 2-D i ch I orobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Methy (naphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene
Benzo tghilperylene
Benzo [k]f luoranthene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
F luoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1254




GH-TP32-01
EAG99
MEAA25
E49
5-25-89
(ug/kg)

240000 J
1000 JB
-- R
490 J
53000 J
5300 J
50000 J


9500 J








8000 JB
3500 JB




11000 JB




14000 J


2800 JB






GH-TP32-01 DL
EDG99 DL
NA
NA
5-25-89
(ug/kg)

290000 DJ

-- R

25000 DJ

180000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:



GH-TP33-01 GH-TP33-01*
EAG87 EDA23
MEAA13 MEAA41
E48 NA
5-25-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg) (mg/kg wet
weight)
730000 J 3400 J
11 B

84
870000 J 2400 J
65000 1100 J
1700000 J 16000 J


100000 J 600


-- R

-- R
-- R
-- R

28000 JB 920
18000 JB 12000
-- R



-- R 1200
-- R

-- R
-- R
37000 J 620
2800 J

-- R

5300 400 J
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
GH-TP33-01DL* GH-TP35-01 GH-TP36-01
EDA23 DL EDA07 EDA01
NA MEAA33 MEAA27
NA E37 E23
5-25-89 5-24-89 5-22-89
(mg/kg wet (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
weight)
4700 D 110
42 JB 520 JB


7500 D 62 1700
1200 D
29000 D 11000


580 J








810 J 130 BJ
26000




2000 J




690 J
4100 J

3200 JB
NA
NA 9300
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
RE = Sample reanalyzed
NA = Not analyzed
GH-FBTP01-01 GH-FBTP02-01
EAG91 EDA12
MEAA17 MEAA38
E21 E53
5-19-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)


36 J 15 JB


1 J













100 JB
38 JB


280 JB
32 J
100 JB







38 J






R = Laboratory data not usable
* = High concentration sample, results



reported in mg/kg wet
weight


-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 1 of 20)
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                                Rl PHASE  III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                    SOIL BORINGS - SUBSURFACE SOIL
                  SAMPLE:
              OTR NUMBER:
              SAS NUMBER:
            DATE SAMPLED:
GH-B13-11-15-01
          EDA32
            E70
        6-15-89
GH-B14-11-15-01
          EAG66
            E63
        6-13-89
GH-B14-15-19-02
          EAG67
            E64
        6-13-89
GH-B15-10-13-01
          EOA34
            E72
        6-15-89
GH-B16-9-12-01
         EDA31
            NA
       6-15-89
GH-B16-12-17-02
          EDA30
            E71
        6-15-89
GH-GH03C-41-42-01
            EDA88
               NA
          7-06-89
                   (ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)






17000 BJ




120000 J
37000 B
210000 J

640000 J






16 B 69 JB 25 JB 14 JB 8 JB
12



3 J
23 B 26 B 6 B 6 B 4 BJ
210 220 140 130 J 28

400 J




14 JB

18 JB





45 JB
26 J


1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene                1600
4-Methylphenol                      120  J
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene                         57  J
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzotalpyrene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene
Benzotk]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene and
    Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate         4600  B
Butyl benzyl phthalate             2500
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate                1600  B
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene                        160  J
Fluorene
                            56 JB
                                             240 JB
                           120 JB
                                                               39 JB
                                                                                                                     870  J

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 2 of 20)
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                                RI PHASE  111 ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                    SOIL BORINGS - SUBSURFACE SOIL
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oil & grease

GH-B13-11-15-01 GH-BU-11-15-01 GH-BH-15-19-02 GH-B15-10-13-01
EDA32 EAG66 EAG67 EDA34
E70 £63 E64 E72
6-15-89 6-13-89 6-13-89 6-15-89

440
3000
400 61 J
170 J
1000 88 J
1200 120 J

111 JB 112 JB 150 JB 191 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-B16-9-12-01 GH-B16-12-17-02 GH-GH03C-41 -42-01
EDA31 EDA30 EDA88
NA E71 NA
6-15-89 6-15-89 7-06-89

55 J

NA 70.2 JB


-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page  3 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-GH15C-78. 5-80. 5-01 GH-GH15C-78. 5-80. 5-01 RE GH-GH198-25-26-01 GH-GH19B-30-31-02 GH-GH27A-9-11-01 GH-GH28A-9-11-01
OTR NUMBER: EDA42 EDA42 RE NA EOA38 EDA24 EDA25
SAS NUMBER: NA NA E86 NA E65 E66
DATE SAMPLED: 7-18-89 7-18-89 7-13-89 7-13-89 6-14-89 6-14-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2, 2- Te t rach I oroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone 5 JB
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride 1 JB
Toluene 860 J
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 2 -Di Chlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] py rene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [k]f luoranthene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo [k] f luoranthene
Benzo ic acid 44 JB
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 43 JB
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene






10 JBD






1200 JD


NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA -•• R
NA
NA 34 JB 5 BJ 24 B
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 64 JB 15 B 19 B
NA 220 220 110
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 4 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
A, It' -DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor

Oi 1 & grease






GH-GH15C-78. 5-80. 5-01 GH-GH15C-78.
EDA42
NA
7-18-89












NA
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
5-80.5-01 RE
EDA42 RE
NA
7-18-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA






GH-GH19B-25-26-01
NA
E86
7-13-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

119 B






GH-GH19B-30-31-02 GH-GH27A-9-11-01 GH-GH28A-9-11-01
EDA38 EDA24 EDA25
NA E65 E66
7-13-89 6-14-89 6-14-89

>










NA 115 JB 133 JB







-------
 06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                  (Page 5 or
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
GH-GH29C-25-26-02
EDA94
E83
7-08-89





9 JB

14 JB





80 JB
120


GH-GH29C-2S-26-02 RE GH-GH29C-45-46-02
EDA94 RE EDA41
NA NA
7-08-89 7-09-89





11 JB

20 JB 16 JB





38 JB 54 JB
81 120


GH-GH30B-12-14-01
EDA95
E84
7-09-89





-- R

210 JB





260 JB
520


GH-GH30B-24-26-02
EDA37
E85
7-09-89





8 JB

16 JB
39




120 JB
160


GH-GH31C-24-26-01
EDA90
E61
7-07-89





44 JB

48 JB





180 JB
980


1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-D j chlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene and
    Benzo[k] f Iuoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
FIuoranthene
Fluorene
120 JB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
440
89 JB
85 JB
670  B

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
(Page 6 of  20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GH29C-25-26-02 GH-GH29C-25-26-02 RE GH-GH29C-45-46-02
EDA94 EDA94 RE EDA41
E83 NA NA
7-08-89 7-08-89 7-09-89
GH-GH30B-12-14-01 GH-GH30B-24-26-02 GH-GH31C-24-26-01
EDA95 EDA37 EDA90
E84 ESS E81
7-09-89 7-09-89 7-07-89
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4, 4' -DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

(mg/kg)
Oil & grease

217 JB
NOTES:
FR = field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL - Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
NA NA
usable
272 JB 112 JB 101 JB


-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 7 of 30)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GH31C-49-51-02
EDA91
E82
7-07-89
GH-GH32A-12-16-01
EDA92
E78
6-22-89
GH-FRGH32A-12-16-01
EDA93
E79
6-22-89
GH-GH33B-9-10-01
EDA36
E74
6-16-89
GH-GH33B-10-11-01
EDA99
E75
6-16-89
GH-GH35A-13-15-01
EOA29
E69
6-U-89
                   (ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo [a] pyretic
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fIuoranthene
Benzo[blfluoranthene and
    Benzo[k]fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
FIuoranthene
Fluorene
 68 JB
 17
 73 JB
160  J
130 JB
430  J
                       --  R

                      160 JB
 90 JB
890
                    24  B
                     3  J
                     4  J
 19  B
180

760  J
                      4 BJ
11  B
21
                    18  B
 15  B
170
360 JB
                                                                                                     65  J
                                                                                                     50 JB

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 8 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(tng/kg>
Oi 1 & grease










GH-GH31C-49-51-02 GH-GH32A-12-16-01
EDA91 EDA92
E82 E78
7-07-89 6-22-89














166 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-FRGH32A-12-16-01 GH-GH33B-9-10-01 GH-GH33B-10-11-01 GH-GH35A-13-15-01
EDA93 EOA36 EDA99 EDA29
E79 E74 E75 E69
6-22-89 6-16-89 6-16-89 6-K-89


63 J

41 J

49 J







71.7 JB 132 JB 106 JB











-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                  (Page 9 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-GH35B-28-30-01 FRGH-GH35B-28-30-01 GH-GH37A-4-7-01 GH-
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
EDA27
E67
6-14-89
EDA26
E68
6-14-89
EDA28
NA
6-U-89
GH38A-9-13-01 GH-L01-3-6-01 GH-L02-4-6-01 GH-L03-4-6-01
EDA33
NA
6-15-89
EDA96
E76
6-16-89
EDA97
E77
6-16-89
EDA98
NA
6-19-89
                   (ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1 -0 i chIoroethene
1,2-0 i chIoroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trich Ioroethene
Xylene (total)

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-0 i chIorobenzene
2-Hethylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzofajpyrene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene and
    Benzo[k]fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
  5 BJ
 12  B
230
 5 BJ
17  B
51
                                          7 JB
14  B
85
                                        300  J
                                         79  J
                                        250  J
                                        540  B
                                        240  J
                                        200  J
                                         80  J
                                        140   J
                                                         15000  J
 320000
  43000 BJ
 510000

1700000
                                  13000   J
                                 83000  JB
                                 35000   J
                                                         11000 JB
                                                     2 BJ
 9  B
38
                                                                                            5 BJ
13  B
14  B
                                                                                                          110
                                                                 890  J
                                                                                   280 J

-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                  (Page 10 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4' -DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oi 1 & grease










GH-GH35B-28-30-01 FRGH-GH35B-28-30-01 GH-GH37A-4-7-01
EDA27 EDA26 EDA28
E67 E68 NA
6-14-89 6-14-89 6-14-89


210 J

240 J

220 J


120 J




138 JB 100 JB NA
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-GH38A-9- 13-01 GH-L01-3-6-01 GH-L02-4-6-01 GH-L03-4-6-01
EDA33 EDA96 EDA97 EDA98
NA E76 E77 NA
6-15-89 6-16-89 6-16-89 6-19-89


40000 J



460 J
19 J
9300 J
26000 J 370 J




NA 52.1 JB 320 JB











-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                 (Page 11 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RB25-22-26-01 GH-RB25-22-26-01 RE GH-RB26- 18-22-01 GH-RB27-21-25-01 GH-RB27-21-25-01 DL GH-RB27-25-29-02
OTR NUMBER: EAG72 EAG72 RE EAG71 EAG69 EAG69 DL EAG68
SAS NUMBER: E42 NA E43 E50 NA E51
DATE SAMPLED: 5-24-89 5-24-89 5-24-89 5-25-89 5-25-89 5-25-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 1 . 1 - Tr i ch I oroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethene
1 , 2 -D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1 ,2, 4- Tri chlorobenzene
1,2-Di chlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4 -Methyl phenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
BenzoCalpyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzo [k)f luoranthene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo tk] f I uoranthene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylph thai ate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
26
300
61
5

4

410
26
590
8
1100


41











300
100



130



J
JB
J

J

J
B
J

J


J











JB
J



JB









8200 DJ

9400 DJ

29000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
--
--
4200
--
--
--
150000
2000
37000
--
300000


1400

54
290
770
81




66

1900
650
92
320

390

460
470
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
J
R
R
R
J
JB
J
R
J




J
J

J




J

JB

J
J

JB



42000
--
4500
--
--
--
240000
2100
110000
16000
540000



1500



62
50
91
53



310

74




93

R
R
R
R
J
R
R
J
R
R
R
J
JB
J
J
J







J
J
J
J



JB

J




J

-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
3700 DJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
220000 DJ
-- R
110000 DJ
16000 DJ
490000 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2 J
170 J
160 J
56 JB
13


2 JB
540 J
25 B
390 J
30
1300 J














96 JB









-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                  (Page 12 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-RB25-22-26-01 GH-RB25-22-26-01 RE GH-RB26-18- 22-01 GH-RB27-21 -25-01 GH-RB27-21 -25-01 OL GH-RB27-25-29-02
EAG72
E42
5-24-89
EAG72 RE EAG71 EAG69
NA E43 E50
5-24-89 5-24-89 5-25-89
EAG69 DL
NA
5-25-89
EAG68
E51
5-25-89
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
99 J
130 J
65 J


-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
NA
NA 3200
NA
NA 1300 68 J
NA
NA 220 J 110 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA










(mg/kg)
Oil & grease






109 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
0 = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
NA 1540 J 205 JB




usable

NA






78 JB







-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 13 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RB27-25-29-02 RE GH-RB28-17-21-01 GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 DL GH-RB28-17-21-01 RE GH-RB28-17-21-01 DL RE GH-RB28-23-27-02
OTR NUMBER: EAG68 RE EDA15 EDA15 DL EDA15 RE EDA15 DL RE EDA18
SAS NUMBER: NA £54 NA NA NA ESS
DATE SAMPLED: 5-25-89 5-30-89 5-30-89 5-30-89 5-30-89 5-30-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Oichtoroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulf ide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 , 2 - D i ch I orobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo tb] f luoranthene
Benzo [k] f luoranthene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo [k] f I uorant hene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F luoranthene
Fluorene


230 DJ
250 D
380 JBD
11 DJ


22 JBD
980 D
160 JBD
490 DJ
34 D
2200 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA





540


460
37000



120000


5400

160
980








11000
2800

740

4100
160
810






J


JB
J



J




J









JB
J



J
J
J









4600 JBD
42000 D



150000 D

410 DJ
4000 DJ


750 DJ








11000 JBD
3000 DJ

620 DJ

4800 DJ

890 DJ
850 DJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


7000 J


1000








8800 J
2900 J

830

4700 J
130 J
980 J

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA








540 JB







71 J











240 JB
100 J



130 JB
390 J
60 J


-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 14 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-RB27-25-29-02 RE GH-RB28-17-21-01 GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 DL GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 RE GH-RB28- 17-21 -01 DL RE GH-RB28-23-27-02
EAG68 RE
NA
5-25-89
EDA15
E54
5-30-89
EDA15 DL
NA
5-30-89
EDA15 RE EDA15 DL RE
NA NA
5-30-89 5-30-89
EDA 18
E55
5-30-89

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 15  of  20)
SAMPLE: GH-RB28-23-27-02 RE GH-RD24-24-28-01 GH-RL29-39-43-01 GH-RU10-16- 19-01 GH-RU21 -24-26-02 GH-RU21 -24-26-02 DL
OTR NUMBER: EDA18 RE EAG64 EDA89 EAG63 EDA17 EDA17 OL
SAS NUMBER: NA E62 E80 E61 E59 NA
DATE SAMPLED: 5-30-89 6-08-89 7-07-89 6-08-89 6-06-89 6-06-89
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo [b] f luoranthene
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene and
Benzo [k] f luoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di -n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA


90 J











220 JB
86 J


44 J

140 J
65 J


4200 J

180000
-- R 1 J
10000 J
140 JB 36000 JB 53 B




120000 1 J
8 B 3100 B 32000 JB 3 JB
160 2900 330000 260 J
27000
460000 13
8700

13000
260 J










360 JB 360 JB 4500 B 120 JB
2500



110 JB 2900 B 200 JB









97





7
260

6
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






JBD





JBD
D

DJ
























-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page 16  of  20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oil & grease










GH-RB28-23-27-02 RE GH-RD24-24-28-01 GH-RL29-39-43-01
EDA18 RE EAG64 EDA89
NA E62 E80
5-30-89 6-08-89 7-07-89

1300
280 J

150 J

89 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA 168 JB 126 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
0 = Di luted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-RW10-16-19-01 GH-RW21 -24-26-02 GH-RU21 -24-26-02 DL
EAG63 EDA17 EDA17 DL
E61 E59 NA
6-08-89 6-06-89 6-06-89

NA
22000 87 J NA
NA
4200 NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
48000 NA
48000 NA
NA
NA

54100 J 262 JB NA
\










-------
06-Mar-90
                                       TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                   (Page  17 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RU21-16-20-01 GH-RW21- 16-20-01 DL GH-RU22- 19-23-01 GH-RW23-14-20-01 GH-RU23-20-22-02 GH-RW24- 18-22-01
OTR NUMBER: EOA19
SAS NUMBER: £58
DATE SAMPLED: 6-06-89
EDA19 DL
NA
6-06-89
EAG73 EDA21
NA E60
6-13-89 6-07-89
EDA20
NA
6-07-89
EDA14
E56
5-31-89
(ug/kg)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-D i ch loroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene 13
Methylene chloride
Toluene 64
Trich loroethene
Xylene (total) 89
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






300000 B




860000 J 5 J
120000 BJ 2 JB
1400000 J 180

4600000 J 61



3 J


33 B





3 JB
67
1 J
28






2800 B




2700
1600 JB


9000
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-D i chIorobenzene
2-Methy(naphthalene
4-Methyl phenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzotalpyrene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fIuoranthene and
    Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthaiate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
2100
                      1900 DJ
2800
                       480 DJ
                                         2400  B
                                          560
                                         1200  B
                    120 JB
110  J




340 JB

100  J


150 JB

100  J
                  8800  J


                    51  J
3400 JB
 630  J

  62  J

1000 JB

-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                  (Page 18 of  20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitcosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroclor-1248
Arocloc-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oi 1 & grease









GH-RU21- 16-20-01 GM-RW21-16-20-01 DL GH-RW22- 19- 23-01 GH-RW23-H-20-01
EDA19 EDA19 DL EAG73 EDA21
E58 NA NA E60
6-06-89 6-06-89 6-13-89 6-07-89


600 J 740 DJ 4700

1800 DJ



390 J
8400 D 4100 D 900 J


8.3 J

4040 J NA NA 260 JB
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
GH-RU23-20-22-02 GH-RU24- 18-22-01
EDA20 EDA14
NA £56
6-07-89 5-31-89


15000 J




-- R
-- R
-- R
670 J
53 J
-- R

NA 5590 J










-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                  (Page 19 of 20)
SAMPLE: GH-RU24-18-22-01RE GH-RW24-18-22-01 DL RE GH-RW30-23-25-01 GH-FBRB01-01 GH-FBRB02-01 FBRB03-01
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
EDAK RE
NA
5-31-89
EDAK DL RE
NA
5-31-89
EAG65 EAG70 EDA16 EDA35
NA E44 E57 E73
6-09-89 5-24-89 6-06-89 6-15-89
(ug/kg)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 1 , 1 - T r i ch I oroethane
1 , 1 -0 i ch I oroethene
1,2-Oichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene (total)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA



13


150 B 25 JB



2 J

6 B 80 JB 8 B
80 2 BJ


1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hethylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene and
    Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
12000  J
   81   J
 2900
  350
   83
 1200
 8400 DJ
 4100 DJ
  500 DJ
1300 JBD
90 JB
                                                                            82  J
                             110  J
   79  J

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 10
                                                                                                                                                  (Page 20 of 20)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDE
Aroc lor- 1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta-BHC
Heptachlor
(mg/kg)
Oi 1 & grease

GH-RU24-18-22-01RE GH-RW24- 18-22-01 DL RE GH-RU30-23-25-01 GH-FBRB01-01 GH-FBRB02-01
EDA14 RE EDA14 DL RE EAG65 EAG70 EDA16
NA NA NA E44 E57
5-31-89 5-31-89 6-09-89 5-24-89 6-06-89

13000 J 20000 DJ
130 J
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA

NA NA NA 169 J 14.9 J
NOTES:
FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
RE = Sample reanalyzed
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
NA = Not analyzed
FBRB03-01
EDA35
E73
6-15-89



210 J


-------
10-Jan-90
                                                                             TABLE 11
                                                                                                                                                    (Page 1 of 6)
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                               Rl PHASE  III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                          TEST PIT AND SOIL BORING - DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSIS
            SAMPLE:  GH-TP01-01   GH-TP01-01RE   GH-TP02-01   GH-TP02-01RE   GH-FRTP02-01RE   GH-TP07-01   GH-TP08-01   GH-TP18-01   GH-TP18-01RE   GH-TP19-01
SAS NUMBER: 4636E05
DATE SAMPLED: 5-19-89
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD 15.702 J
Octa-CDD 43.098 J
2.3,7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF 4.25 J
4636E05RE
5-19-89

3.409 J
11.312 J
40.062 J



5.846 J
5.463 J
2.819 J
4636E01
5-16-89

.888 J
1.833 J
3.042 J


.212 J
.253 J
1.082 J
.629 J
4636E01RE
5-16-89

.739 J
2.239 J
4.543 J




1.299 J
.786 J
4636E02RE
5-16-89

.079 J
.72 J
1.384




.361
.229
4636E03
5-16-89



1.055

.304
.532
.808 J
2.396 J
6.398
4636E04
5-16-89

1.157 J
9.246 J
16.856
.404

1.993
1.142 J
5.844 J
5.809
4636E06
5-19-89

2.097 J
8.049 J
9.431 J



2.152 J
3.542 J

4636E06RE
5-19-89

3.269 J
9.473 J
6.212 J



4.92 J
10.292 J
2.247 J
4636E07
5-19-89

.082 J
.326 J




.056 J
.205 J

                         NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                   J = Estimated value

-------
10-Jan-90
                                                                             TABLE 11
                                                                                                                                                    (Page 2 of  6)
            SAMPLE:    GH-TP19-01RE   GH-TP21-01RE   GH-TP2S-01   GH-TP25-01RE   GH-TP26-01RE   GH-TP28-01   CH-TP29-01    GH-TP29-01RE   GH-TP30-01    GH-TP31-01
SAS NUHBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-COD
Octa-CDD
2,3.7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-COF
4636E07RE
5-19-89

.14 J
.429 J
.473 J



.174 J
.428 J
.078 J
4636E08RE 4636E11
5-22-89 5-23-89

.437 J
.08 .768 J
.112 1.113 J



.784 J
.043 1.616 J
.385 J
4636E11RE
5-23-89

.325 J
1.171 J
1.771 J



.909 J
2.017 J
.399 J
4636E12RE 4636E18 4636E13 4636E13RE
5-24-89 5-25-89 5-24-89 5-24-89


.318 J .746 J 1.319 J
.608 1.834 J 2.796 J



.177 1.291 J
.282 .329 J
.207 J .324 J
4636E14 4636E15
5-24-89 5-24-89

1.207 J
.934 J
.331 J



1.03 J
2.984 J
.622 J
                             NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                       J = Estimated value

-------
10-Jan-90
                                                                             TABLE 11
                                                                                                                                                    (Page 3 of  6)
            SAMPLE:     GH-TP31-01RE   GH-TP33-01   GH-TP35-01   GH-TP-36-01   GH-TP36-01RE   GH-FRTP36-01   GH-FRTP36-01RE   GH-TPFB02-01   GH-B13-11-15-01
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-COD
Octa-COD
2.3,7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
4636E15RE 4636E17 4636E16
5-24-89 5-25-89 5-24-89

1.134 J
1.025 J .376 J
.665 J 1.752



1.02 J
2.685 J
.638 J
4636E09 4636E09RE
5-22-89 5-22-89

.139 J
.318 J
.403 J
'-


.164 J
.481 J .574 J
.153 J
4636E10
5-22-89

.139 J
.434 J
.426 J



.157 J
.542 J
.177 J
4636E10RE 4636E19
5-22-89 5-25-89

.142 J
.632 J
.767 J



.198 J
.722 J
.281 J
4711E15
6-15-89










                             NOTES:    FR = Field replicate
                                       J = Estimated value

-------
10-Jan-90                                                                    TABLE 11                                                               (Page 4 of 6)
            SAMPLE:    GH-BU-11-15-01   GH-GH19B-25-26-01   GH-GH29C-24-25-01   GH-GH35A-13-15-01   GH-GH42B-14-16-01   GH-RB2S-22-26-01   GH-RB26-18-22-01
        SAS NUMBER:            4711E13             4711E20             4711E19             4711E16             4711E14            4711E01            4711E02
      DATE SAMPLED:            6-13-89             7-13-89             7-08-89             6-14-89             6-20-89            5-24-89            5-24-89

             (ug/kg)


Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD                                                                                                                                           .435
Octa-CDD                                                                                                                                            .445
2,3,7,8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF


                                NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                          J = Estimated value

-------
10-Jan-90
                                                                             TABLE 11
                                                                                                                                                    (Page 5 of 6)
            SAMPLE:     GH-RB27-21-25-01   GH-RB27-25-29-02   GH-RB28-17-21-01   GH-RB28-23-27-02   GH-RL29-39-43-01    GH-RW10-16-19-01    GH-RU21-16-20-01
SAS NUMBER: 4711 £04
DATE SAMPLED: 5-25-89
(ug/kg)
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD
Octa-CDD
2.3,7.8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
4711E05 4711E06
5-25-89 5-30-89


.329
.381



.227
.66
.209
4711E07 4711E18 4711E11
5-30-89 7-07-89 6-08-89

.06 J
1.41
3.876


.064
.218
1.225
1.57
4711E09
6-06-89

.087 J
.387
.614


.011
.249
.921
.302
                                 NOTES:    FR = Field replicate
                                           J = Estimated value

-------
10-Jan-90                                                                    TABLE 11                                                               (Page 6  of 6)
            SAMPLE:    GH-RU22-19-23-01   GH-RU23-U-20-01   GH-RU24-18-22-01   GH-FBRB01-01   GH-FBR804-01
        SAS NUMBER:             4711E12            4711E10            4711E08        4711E03        4711E17
      DATE SAMPLED:             6-13-89            6-07-89            5-31-89        5-24-89        6-21-89

             (ug/kg)
Hexa-COD
Hepta-CDD                      .339
Octa-CDD                       .737               .422
2,3,7,8-Tetra-CDF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF                       .15
Octa-CDF
                                 NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                           J = Estimated value

-------
04-Jan-90
                                                                             TABLE 12
                                                                                                                                                    (Page 1 of 2)
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                                Rl PHASE  III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                         TEST PITS AND SOIL BORINGS - INCINERATION PARAMETERS
SAMPLE: GH-TP01-01 GH-TP06-01
SAS NUMBER: 4634E30 4634E26
DATE SAMPLED: 5-19-89 5-16-89
Percent Moisture
Percent Ash
Percent Volatile Matter
Percent Fixed Carbon
Heating Value (BTU/lb)
23.6
44.5
19.9
12
6230
12.2
75.6
12.7

2150
GH-TP08-01 GH-FRTP08-01 GH-TP09-01 GH-TP11-01 GH-TP15-01 GH-B13-11-15-01
4634E24 4634E25 4634E29 4634E28 4634E27 4730E05
5-16-89 5-16-89 5-17-89 5-17-89 5-17-89 6-15-89
32.9 25.2 42.8 27.8 19.5
42.8 62.8 39.9 55.7 25.6
22.9 13.7 23.9 20.3 55.3
1.4
3880 666 2160 3050 6590
12.67
78.94
9.92
-1.53
20
                                NOTES:   FR = Field replicate
                                          J = Estimated value

-------
04-Jan-90
TABLE 12
                                                                                                                                                    (Page  2  of 2)
SAMPLE: GH-B15-10-13-01 GH-GH38A-9-13-01 GH-RB28-23-27-02 GH-RU21- 16-20-01 GH-RU22- 19-23-01 GH-RU24- 18-22-01
SAS NUMBER: 4730E07 4730E06 4730E01 4730E03 4730E04 4730E02
DATE SAMPLED: 6-15-89 6-15-89 5-30-89 6-06-89 6-13-89 5-31-89
Percent Moisture
Percent Ash
Percent Volatile Matter
Percent Fixed Carbon
Heating Value (BTU/lb)
9.67
73.79
11.76
4.78
32
12.04
74.93
15.22
-1.63
165
13.79
79.85
6.1
.26
28
12.84
78.15
7.33
1.68
3.5
8.06
72.08
20.83
-.97
43
12.7
70.45
13.99
2.86
393
                                        NOTES:    FR = Field replicate
                                                  J = Estimated value

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 13
                                                                                                                                                           (Page  1 of 6)
                                                                               •G&H LANDFILL
                                                                   RI PHASE III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                                 SEDIMENT
SAMPLE: GH-SD01-02* GH-SD01-02 DL*
OTR NUMBER: EDFOO EDFOO DL
ITR NUMBER: HEACOO NA
DATE SAMPLED: 8-01-89 8-01-89


Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc


2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
11 JB
4 JB
5 J

10
.5 JB
1 J
180 J
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(mg/kg wet
weight)
39 JBD
22 JBD
5 D

10 D
3 JBD

160 D
GH-SD02-02*
EDF01
MEAC01
8-01-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
21 JB
23 J
2 J

25
2 JB
2 J
150
GH-SD03-02*
EDF02
MEAC02
8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
9 JB
1 JB
.7 J

1
.3 JB

52
GH-FRSD03-02*
EDF07
MEAC07
8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
12 JB
11 J



1 JB


GH-SD04-02* GH-SD04-02 L
EDF03 EDF03 L
MEAC03 NA
8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
14 JB
11 JB



1 JB


(mg/kg)

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)

-- R
-- R



18 BJ


GH-SD05-02
EDF04
MEAC04
8-02-89
(mg/kg)

3550
128
387


52000
10.6
8.2
48.5
16200
109
9440
166
.49
18
1180

2200
17.3
48.1

J
J



J

J

J


J

J
J

J
J
J
(ug/kg)






30








B


GH-SD06-02
EDF05
MEAC05
8-02-89
(mg/kg)

45100
47.4
543
2

79800
93.5
33.8
139
86400
466
37400
1100
.57
83.9
5400

1640
100
392

J
J

J

J

J

J


J




J

J
(ug/kg)

34
420



220



J
B



B



-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 13
                                                                                                                                                         (Page 2 of 6)
                                                                              G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  Rl PHASE  III ROUND 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                                SEDIMENT
SAMPLE: GH-SD01-02*
OTR NUMBER: EDFOO
ITR NUMBER: MEACOO
DATE SAMPLED: 8-01-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
4,4'-DDE
4.4'-DDT
Aroclor-1254 74
2-Methylnaphthatene 12 J
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzotalpyrene
Benzo [b]f luoranthene and
Benzo [kl f I uorant hene
Benzo [ghilperylene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Chtoroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 140
Butyl benzyl phthalate 16
Chrysene
Dibenzo [a, h] anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate 16
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F luoranthene
Fluorene
I ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 30
Naphthalene 8 J
Phenanthrene 6 J
Phenol 16
Pyrene
NOTES:









GH-SD01-02 DL* GH-SD02-02* GH-SD03-02* GH-FRSD03-02*
EDFOO DL EDF01 EDF02 x EDF07
NA MEAC01 MEAC02 MEAC07
8-01-89 8-01-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg wet (mg/kg wet (mg/kg wet (mg/kg wet
weight) weight) weight) weight)
NA
NA
NA 14 J 5.3 J 4.6 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 30 22 4 J
NA 8 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 6 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 6 J
NA 4 J
NA
NA 3 J
NA
FR = Field replicate
B - Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
L = Reanalyzed as low to medium concentration samples
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
DL = Diluted sample
D = Diluted result
GH-SD04-02* GH-SD04-02 L GH-SD05-02 GH-SD06-02
EDF03
MEAC03
8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA










EDF03 L EDF04 EDF05
NA MEAC04 MEAC05
8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)














3500 J 3000 J
6800
970 J 2500 J







230 J






230 J











-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 13
                                                                                                                                                         (Page 3 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-SD07-02* GH-SD07-02 L
OTR NUMBER: EOF06 EDF06 L
ITR NUMBER: MEAC06 NA
DATE SAMPLED: 8-02-89 8-02-89


Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc


2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
9 JB
.9 JB



.8 JB


(mg/kg)

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)

-- R
-- R






GH-SD08-02* GH-SD08-02 L
EDF09 EDF09 L
MEAC09 NA
8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg wet
weight)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(mg/kg wet
weight)
10 JB
3 JB



1 JB


(mg/kg)

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(ug/kg)

-- R
-- R
9 J


1000 J
22 J

GH-SD09-02 GH-FRS009-02
EOF11 EDF10
ME AC 11 ME AC 10
8-02-89 8-02-89
(mg/kg)

3160 J
6.6 J
33.9 J


5700 J
8.6
3.9 JB
13.9
5950 J
9.1
2840
51.2 J

6.8 J
291 J

721 J
8.9 J
18.8 J
(ug/kg)

9 J
76 B



37 B
3 J

(mg/kg)

5810
6
43.7


7490
26.2
5
17.3
12700
10.5
6000
102

15.2
346


24.8
25.6

J
J
J


J

JB

J


J


J



J
(ug/kg)

6
44



22



J
B



B


GH-SD10-02
EDF12
MEAC12
8-02-89
(mg/kg)

2040 J
3 J
50.1 J


59900 J
6
3.2 JB
14.3
4780 J
6.2
7850
137 J

5.6 J
332 J

557 J
7.7 J
19.4 J
(ug/kg)


39 B



31 B


GH-S011-02
EDF13
ME AC 13
8-02-89
(mg/kg)

5270 J
4.6 J
50.4
.23 J
1.3
56500 J
33.3
9 J
67
19400 J
182
15000
560 J
.15
30.8
572 J


16.6
210 J
(ug/kg)


38 B



22 B
140

GH-SD12-02
EDF14
ME AC 14
8-02-89
(mg/kg)

5080 J
4.1 J
32.9 J

1.2
99300 J
30.3
7.4 J
47.8
12200 J
103
13900
629 J
.13
33.4
618 J


17.5
131 J
(ug/kg)


11 B

1 J

15 B


GH-SD13-02
EDF15
ME AC 15
8-02-89
(mg/kg)

7160 J
6.2 J
44.3 J
.4 J

67500 J
15.9
7.4 J
28.3
17400 J
51.2
26200
391 J

18.6
1350
1.9 J

22.8
62.6 J
(ug/kg)


59 B



110 B
50


-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 13
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 4 of 6)
SAMPLE: GH-SD07-02*
OTR NUMBER: EDF06
ITR NUMBER: MEAC06
DATE SAMPLED: 8-02-89

4, 4' -DDE
4, 4' -DDT
Aroclor-1254
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo [a] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene and
Benzo tk] f luoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzo ic acid
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
D i benzo [a , h] anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
I ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene










(mg/kg wet
weight)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:









GH-SD07-02 L GH-SD08-02* GH-SD08-02 L GH-SD09-02 GH-FRSD09-02 GH-SD10-02 GH-SD11-02 GH-SD12-02 GH-SD13-02
EDF06 I EDF09 EDF09 L EDF11 EDF10 EDF12 EDF13 EDF14 EDF15
NA MEAC09 NA MEAC11 MEAC10 MEAC12 MEAC13 MEAC14 HEAC15
8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89 8-02-89
(ug/kg) (mg/kg wet (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
weight)
NA
NA
390 J NA 880 J
NA
NA 57 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA 130 J
NA
NA 710 J 77 J 82 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 680 J
NA
NA
NA
NA 160 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 530 J
NA 170 J
FR = Field replicate
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
L = Reanalyzed as low to medium concentration samples
* = High concentration sample, results reported in mg/kg
DL = Diluted sample
D = Di luted result
23

47 J
44 J
170 J
730 87 J
640 100 J

1300 J 170 J
290 J 87 J


770 860
190 J 50 J
750 98 J
120 J

90 J
68 J

1600 160 J
41 J
280 J 78 J


910 110 J

1000 140 J










(ug/kg)





55 J
53 J

84 J



200 J
48 J
66 J





91 J




52 J

88 J











-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 13
                                                                                                                                                         (Page 5  of  6)
SAMPLE :
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc

2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (total)
GH-SDK-02
EDF16
MEAC16
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
2960 J
2.1 J
17.5 J


46700 J
7.6
3.8 JB
11
6550 J
47.7
11500
181 J

7.3 J
408 J

363 J
9.3 J
27.4 J
(ug/kg)
29 B



25 B
8

GH-SD15-02
EDF17
MEAC17
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
10900 J
11.9 J
195
.62 J
3.2
68200 J
68.1
13.2 J
111
24400 J
536
24200
778 J
.31
40.3
1660


33.1
372 J
(ug/kg)
34 B



20 B


GH-SD16-02
EDF18
ME AC 18
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
1910 J
2.2 J
17.2 J
.13 J

36800 J
9.6
3 JB
14
5320 J
9.6
11300
163 J

7.6 J
273 J


7.9 J
38.9 J
(ug/kg)
36 B

2 J

24 B


GH-SD17-02
EDF19
HEAC19
8-02-89
(mg/kg)
3990 J
3.9 J
39 J


31600 J
9.3
5.6 JB
14.1
8730 J
11.1
9110
628 J

10.4
396 JB


14
30 J
(ug/kg)
18 B



12 B



-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE 13
                                                                                                                                                        (Page 6 of 6)
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Aroclor-1254
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzota] anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene and
Benzo [kj f I uoranthene
Benzo [gh i ] pery I ene
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
D i benzo [a , h] anthracene
Oiethylphthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
F I uoranthene
Fluorene
1 ndeno [ 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene










GH-S014-02
EDF16
MEAC16
8-02-89
(ug/kg)








68 J
61 J

110 J
47 J


180 J
39 J
74 J





140 J

47 J


89 J

110 J
NOTES:









GH-SD1S-02 GH-SD16-02
EDF17 EDF18
MEAC17 MEAC18
8-02-89 8-02-89
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)

50





75 J 47 J
380 J 150 J
460 150 J

950 J 260 J
350 J 78 J
61 J

1700 400 J
220 J 99 J
590 200 J
150 J


68 J
85 J
930 420 J

320 J 70 J


410 J 200 J

950 400 J
FR = Field replicate
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
NR = Data not received
NA = Not analyzed
L = Reanalyzed as low t
* = High concentration
DL = Diluted sample
0 = Di luted result
GH-SD17-02
EDF19
HEAC19
8-02-89
(ug/kg)
28












180 J

520


















usable


o medium cone
sample, resul



-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE  14
                                                                                                                                                           Page 1 of 9
                                                                               G&H  LANDFILL
                                                                 Rl  PHASE  II  EVENT  1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AMBIENT  AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-AA-C-UWF-01 GH-AA-C-UWB-01 GH-AA-C-TPF-01 GH-AA-C-TPB-01 GH-AA-C-SAF-01 GH-AA-C-SAB-01 GH-AA-C-DFF-01 GH-AA-C-DFB-01
E15 E16 E17 E18 E19 E20 E21 E22
05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89

-- R

-- R

0.4 J


31 J
15.2 BJ
1.3 J
-- R
8.6 BJ

32 BJ
7.6 J
142.1 J
22.8 J
12.7 J
36.5 J
26.4 J

7.1 J

-- R -- R -- R -- R






20.8 J 35.6 J 11.1 J 8.6 J
3.1 BJ 1.9 BJ


2.8 BJ

0.4 BJ 39.6 BJ 115.6 BJ 32.1 BJ
1.8 J 7.6 J
8.1 BJ 57.8 BJ 31.6 BJ 28.4 BJ
2.6 BJ
2.4 BJ
42.1 BJ 48.9 BJ 1.7 BJ 14.2 BJ
1 BJ 8.9 BJ 5.6 BJ

14.2 J 25.8 J 8 J

-- R -- R






36.7 J
2.9 BJ
2.2 J



37.7 BJ 10.1 BJ
1.5 J
43.8 BJ 129.5 BJ

2.7 BJ
1.1 BJ 23 BJ
15.1 BJ

8.6 J

-- R






10.1 J





42.4 BJ

23 BJ


1.9 BJ



                    NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                            FB = Field Blank
                            TB = Trip Blank
                             B = Blank Contamination
                             J = Estimated Value
                             R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
                                                                                                                                                             Page 2 of 9
                                                                               G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                   AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1 , 2 • D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Ch t orobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ene Chloride
Styrene
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-FROFF-01 GH-AA-C-FROFB-01 GH-AA-C-DRF-01 GH-AA-C-DRB-01 GH-AA-C-FBF-01 GH-AA-C-TBF-01 GH-AA-C-UUF-02 GH-AA-C-UUB-02
E23
05-22-89

-- R







3.7 BJ




371.3 J

209.6 BJ


24.6 BJ
9.6 BJ


FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E24
05-22-89

-- R







1.9 BJ




26.9 BJ

17.4 BJ
6 BJ
1.2 BJ
4.5 BJ


7.8 BJ





Usable
E25 E26
05-22-89 05-22-89

-- R -- R

0.8 BJ




16.3 BJ
3 BJ
1.5 J

4.5 BJ 2.2 BJ

3.7 BJ 11.3 BJ
11.9 BJ
68.8 BJ 28.8 BJ
3.6 BJ 1.5 BJ
3.5 BJ
26.9 BJ 3.8 BJ
15 J

20 BJ






E27 E28 E43 E44
05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89

-- R -- R -- R -- R






3.8 BJ
1.2 BJ 4.8 B
6.5 J
-- R -- R
2.6 BJ 2.7 B

2.1 BJ 65 J

4 BJ 145 BJ 62.6 BJ 43.5 BJ


2.4 BJ










-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
                                                                                                                                                             Page 3 of 9
                                                                               G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 Rl PHASE  II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AHBIENT  AIR  - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,H-Dichloroethane
1 , 2 -D i ch I oroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-TPF-02 GH-AA-C-TPB-02 GH-AA-C-FRTPF-02 GH-AA-C-FRTPB-02 GH-AA-C-FRTPB-02RE GH-AA-C-SAF-02 GH-AA-C-SAB-02
E45 £46
05-22-89 05-22-89

-- R -- R






10.1 BJ


-- R -- R



275.3 J 4.3 J
32 BJ 14 BJ


15.7 J


730.3 J 15.7 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B - Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
E47
05-22-89

-- R








11.1 J
-- R


150 BJ
105.6 J
300 J


7.8 J
5.2 J

300 J






E48
05-22-89

-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
2.7 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
16.7 BJ
-- R
11.7 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R






E48RE
05-22-89

-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
2.8 J






E49
05-22-89

-- R

-- R




6 BJ


-- R


1.1 BJ
0.7 J
15.2 BJ

-- R
4.1 J
2.4 J

4.7 J






E50
05-22-89

-- R

-- R







-- R


42.4 BJ

36.4 BJ

-- R











-------
06-Har-90
                                                                                TABLE 14
Page 4 of 9
                                                                               G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 RI PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, ,1-Trichloroethane
, ,2-Trichloroethane
, -Dichloroethane
, -Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-DFF-02 GH-AA-C-DRF-02 GH-AA-C-DRB-02 GH-AA-C-FBF-02 GH-AA-C-TBF-02 GH-AA-C-UUF-03 GH-AA-C-UUB-03 GH-AA-C-TPF-03
E51
05-22-89

-- R

-- R




7.6 B

2 J
-- R


10.8 8J

63.3 BJ

-- R

6.3


FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E53
05-22-89

-- R

-- R




2.8 BJ


-- R


11.4 BJ
2.5 J
28.6 BJ

-- R
2 J


3.6 J





Usable
E54 £55 E56 E57 E58 E59
05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89

-- R -- R -- R -- R -- R -- R

-- R -- R -- R




4.5 J 7.4 BJ
2 BJ 1.8 BJ 3.3 BJ 2 BJ 7.4 BJ
2.9 J
-- R -- R -- R
4.9 BJ

9 BJ 34.5 BJ 19 BJ 13.6 BJ 6.6 BJ 6.4 BJ
73.9 J
6.2 BJ 25.5 BJ 13.5 BJ 222.2 BJ 19.2 BJ 54.2 BJ
10.8 BJ
-- R -- R -- R
3.7 BJ 251.2 J
4.7 BJ 20.2 J

295.6 J







-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE  14
                                                                                                                                                           Page 5 of 9
                                                                              G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 Rl  PHASE  II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AMBIENT  AIR  - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-TPB-03 GH-AA-C-SAF-03 GH-AA-C-SAB-03 GH-AA-C-FRSAF-03 GH-AA-C-FRSAB-03 GH-AA-C-DFF-03 GH-AA-C-DFB-03 GH-AA-C-DRF-03
SAS NUMBER: £60 E61 E62 E63 E64 E65 E66 E67
DATE SAMPLED: 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Oichloroethane
,1-Oichloroethene
, 2-0 i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)

-- R -- R -- R







4.2 BJ 3 BJ
1.5 J

4.7 BJ

45.3 BJ 60.9 BJ 91.4 BJ
-- R -- R
36 BJ 132 BJ 34 BJ
12.3 BJ 9.6 BJ

6.9 BJ 13.7 BJ 5.1 BJ
2.5 BJ

31 BJ 8.6 BJ

-- R -- R -- R -- R -- R






52 J
4.5 BJ 3.6 BJ 2.6 BJ 6.1 BJ 1.7 BJ
2.1 J

3.2 BJ 4.2 BJ 3.9 BJ 3.8 BJ

302.2 BJ 230.8 BJ 106.1 BJ 307.3 BJ 10.1 BJ
4.5 BJ -- R -- R 10.6 J 7.2 BJ
170.3 BJ 45.6 BJ 100.6 BJ 55.9 BJ 19.2 BJ
167.6 J 6.7 BJ

13.7 BJ 5.3 BJ 11.7 BJ 24.6 BJ 15.4 BJ
2.9 BJ 4 BJ 4.2 BJ

25.3 J 34.6 J 20.2 BJ
                    NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                            FB = Field Blank
                            TB = Trip Blank
                             B = Blank Contamination
                             J = Estimated Value
                             R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 14
                                                                                                                                                             Page 6 of 9
                                                                               G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 RI PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2- Tet rach I oroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
, 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-D i ch I oroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Ch I orobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-DRB-03 GH-AA-C-FBF-03 GH-AA-C-TBF-03 GH-AA-C-UWF-04 GH-AA-C-UUB-04 GH-AA-C-FRUWF-04 GH-AA-C-FRUUB-04 GH-AA-C-TPF-04
E68
05-23-89

-- R







2 BJ




96.2 BJ
-- R
38.5 BJ
5.3 BJ

2.2 BJ



FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E69 E70
05-23-89 05-23-89

-- R -- R







1.6 BJ 2.2 BJ


3.6 BJ 2.3 BJ

3 BJ 145 J
1.6 J -- R
6 BJ 50 BJ
2 BJ 2.1 BJ

4.1 BJ 3.8 BJ








Usable
E99 E100
05-24-89 05-24-89

-- R -- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.6 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
7.1 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R 1.8 BJ
-- R
21.2 BJ 7.6 BJ
3.9 BJ -- R
87 BJ 7.1 BJ
-- R -- R
3.4 BJ
27.2 BJ 2.1 BJ
10.9 J
-- R
31 BJ






E101
05-24-89

-- R







4.3 BJ




56 BJ
-- R
35.8 BJ
-- R
1.9 BJ
14.2 BJ
4.1 BJ








E102 E103
05-24-89 05-24-89

-- R -- R



1.9 J

2.8 J

1.2 BJ 5.5 BJ
2.7 J

5 BJ

51.7 BJ 189.1 BJ
-- R 39.3 BJ
17.7 BJ 194 BJ
-- R -- R
3.1 BJ
1.3 BJ 69.7 BJ
9.5 J
1.1 J
184.1 BJ







-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE  U
                                                                                                                                                           Page 7 of 9
                                                                               G&H  LANDFILL
                                                                 RI  PHASE  II  EVENT  1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AMBIENT  AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-TPB-04 GH-AA-C-SAF-04 GH-AA-C-SAB-04 GH-AA-C-DFF-04 GH-AA-C-DFB-04 GH-AA-C-DRF-04 GH-AA-C-DRB-04 GH-AA-C-FBF-04
SAS NUMBER: E104 E105 E106 E107 E108 E109 E110 £111
DATE SAMPLED: 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89 05-24-89
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
, 2-D i ch I oroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)

-- R







1.3 BJ

-- R
4 BJ

11.4 BJ
6 BJ
3.8 BJ
10.4 BJ

4.7 BJ


19.4 BJ

-- R -- R -- R







3.2 BJ 2 BJ

-- R -- R -- R
2.1 BJ

1.2 BJ 16.4 BJ 9.5 BJ
-- R -- R 5.5 BJ
5 BJ 4.6 BJ 13.6 BJ

1.4 BJ
7.8 BJ 1.6 BJ 16.6 BJ
3 J

10.5 BJ 16.1 BJ

-- R -- R -- R







1.8 BJ

-- R -- R -- R
2.4 BJ 2.2 BJ

3.9 BJ 5 BJ 1.5 BJ
9 BJ 8.1 BJ 2.3 BJ
4.3 BJ 16.7 BJ 1.3 BJ
6 BJ 2 BJ 6.8 BJ
1.7 BJ
5 BJ 19 BJ 1.6 BJ
3.8 J

18.6 BJ 23.5 BJ 8.6 BJ

55 J







2.3 BJ

-- R
8.5 BJ

115 J
46 J
39 J
55 J

27 BJ


105 J
                    NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                            FB = Field Blank
                            TB = Trip Blank
                             B = Blank Contamination
                             J = Estimated Value
                             R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
06-Mar-90
TABLE 14
                                                                                                                                                             Page 8 of 9
                                                                               G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1,2 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichtoroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-TBF-04 GH-AA-C-UUF-05 GH-AA-C-UUB-05 GH-AA-C-TPF-OS GH-AA-C-TPB-OS GH-AA-C-SAF-OS GH-AA-C-SAB-05 GH-AA-C-DFF-05
E112
05-24-89

-- R









-- R


12.5 J
-- R
6 BJ
2.6 BJ





FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
£127
05-25-89

12.8 J








1.3 J

2.6 BJ

5.3 BJ
7.5 BJ
149.8 BJ
5.7 BJ

12.8 BJ
10.6 J

14.5 BJ





Usable
E128 E129
05-25-89 05-25-89

-- R -- R



1.1 J

39.6

1.6 J


1.3 BJ

30.4 BJ 25.3 BJ
35.5 J
11.9 BJ 69.1 BJ
2.1 BJ 3.7 B
4.2 B
1.2 BJ 38.2 B
11.1 J
5.1
156.7 J






E130 E131
05-25-89 05-25-89

-- R -- R










1.8 BJ 1.3 BJ

12 BJ 2.3 BJ
4.2 BJ 12 BJ
9.2 BJ 8.2 BJ
5.5 BJ 2.1 BJ

13.5 BJ
2.5 J

11.5 BJ 44.2 J






E132 E133
05-25-89 05-25-89

-- R 194.7 J










15.3 BJ

15.4 BJ 3.2 BJ
68.4 BJ
11.5 BJ 25.3 BJ
2.5 BJ 126.3 BJ

1.2 BJ 4.7 BJ
8.4 J

7.2 BJ 242.1 BJ







-------
06-Mar-90
                                                                                TABLE 14
                                                                                                                                                            Page 9 of 9
                                                                               G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 Rl PHASE II EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-DFB-05 GH-AA-C-DRF-05 GH-AA-C-ORB-OS GH-AA-C-FRDRF-OS GH-AA-C-FRORB-OS GH-AA-C-FBF-05 GH-AA-C-TBF-OS
SAS NUMBER: E134 E135 E136 E137 E138 E139 EUO
DATE SAMPLED: 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89
(ug/m3)
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane -- R -- R -- R -- R
, ,1-Trichloroethane
, ,2-Trichloroethane
, -Dichloroethane
, -Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene 1.1 J 1.9 J
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene 1 BJ 1.5 BJ
Chloroform
Chloromethane 6.3 BJ 7 BJ 24.8 BJ 56.1 BJ
Ethyl benzene 3.1 J
Hethylene Chloride 6.3 BJ 12.6 BJ 8.1 BJ 32.1 BJ
Styrene 2.8 B 3 B 1.7 BJ
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene 5.6 BJ 4.8 B 3.7 BJ
Trichloroethene 1.5 J 1.4 J
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total) 7.4 B 3.2 BJ

-- R -- R -- R







1.7 J




102 BJ 8 BJ 20.5 J

9.7 BJ 8 BJ 19 BJ
1.3 BJ

2.2 BJ 11 J


1.6 J
                    NOTES:  FR = Field Replicate
                            FB = Field Blank
                            TB = Trip Blank
                             B = Blank Contamination
                             J = Estimated Value
                             R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 15
                                                                                                                                                       Page  1 of  10
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                                Rl PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAHPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,1-Trichl oroet hane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trich I oroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:


GH-AA-T-UWF-01 GH-AA-T-UUB-01 GH-AA-T-TPF-01 GH-AA-T-TPB-01 GH-AA-T-SAF-01 GH-AA-T-SAB-01 GH-AA-T-DFF-01 GH-AA-T-DFB-01
E01
05-22-89

7 B


18.6 J
3.1 J
4.5 B
4.4
0.8
0.7
0.8 B

3.1
45.2
1.9
21.6
31.7

12.1
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
E02
05-22-89

2.7 B


3 BJ

6.5 B
0.2 J


0.4 B


2.8 B

0.7 B


0.6 B



£03
05-22-89

4.4 8

0.4 J
5.3 BJ

4.5 B
2.7
0.4
0.4
0.6 B

1.8
23
1
11.2
9.6

7



E04 £05
05-22-89 05-22-89

3.8 B 10.2 B

0.2 J
2 BJ 2 BJ

4.1 B 3.4 B
0.5
0.6

0.4 B

0.3 JB
4.4 B 38.9

1.1 0.8 BJ
2.1

0.5 B 16



£06
05-22-89

2 B


2 BJ

2.2 B
0.1 J


0.3 B


3.9 B

1.3 J


0.2 JB



£07
05-22-89

7.3 B

0.2 J
4.6 BJ

12 B
3.3 J
1.9 J

0.5 B

0.5 B
113.3 J
0.7
8.7 J
18

2.1 B



EOS
05-22-89

7.3 B


2.9 BJ

4.3 B
1.3 J
0.3 J




16.7 J

2.1 J


0.4 B



B = Blank Contamination


J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data

Not Usable











-------
07-Har-90
TABLE 15
                                                                                                                                                       Page 2  of  10
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                                 RI PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-T-FRDFF-01 GH-AA-T-FRDFB-01 GH-AA-T-DRF-01 GH-AA-T-DRB-01 GH-AA-T-FRDRF-01 GH-AA-T-FRDRB-01 GH-AA-T-FBF-01
E09
05-22-89

4.7 B


5.6 BJ

4.3 B
2 J
0.3 J
0.3 J
0.6 B

1 B
22.2 J
0.7 J
11.8 J
15.3

4.5 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E10
05-22-89

5.6 B




5.8 B
0.3 J
0.2 J




36.8 J
0.3 J
2.8 J
1.8 J

0.8 B





Usable
E11A
05-22-89

4.6 B


4.9 BJ

6.5 B
2.8 J
0.7 J
0.4


0.2 JB
42 J
0.4 J
5.3 J
7.7 J

0.5 B






E12A
05-22-89

4.5 B


2 BJ

3 B
1.1 J
0.6 J

0.3 B


71 J




0.3 B






E11B
05-22-89

2.3 B

0.8
5.7 BJ

7.6 B
3.1
2.2 J
0.4
0.5 B

0.7 B
152.9 J
1.1 J
12.7 J
33.1 J

2.5 B






E12B
05-22-89

1.3 B


1.6 BJ

4.8 B
0.1 J
1.9 J




159.2 J

1 B


0.4 B






E13
05-22-89

2.5


1 BJ

1.2 B






0.4 B












-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE  15
                                                                                                                                                      Page 3 of  10
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                               AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS  (TENAX)
                                                              RI  PHASE III EVENT 1  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-TBF-01 GH-AA-T-UUF-02 GH-AA-T-UUB-02 GH-AA-T-TPF-02 GH-AA-T-TPB-02 GH-AA-T-FRTPF-02 GH-AA-T-FRTPB-02 GH-AA-T-SAF-02
SAS NUMBER: E14 E29 E30 E31 E32 E33 E34 E3S
DATE SAMPLED: 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89 05-22-89

1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Bisulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)

5.5 2.7 B


1.5 BJ

1.8 B 3.8 B
0.9 B
0.7
0.3
0.4 B 0.4 B

0.4 B
0.9 B 45.2 J
0.2 J
0.1 J 4.2
9.6

2.2 B

2.1 B 2.7 B 1.9 B

0.8
4 BJ

13.9 J 6.9 B
6.9
2 J

0.3 B 0.4 B

323.7 0.3 B
16 J 75.1 J 13.9 J

46.2
0.1 J 8.1

0.7 B 867.1 1.5 B

2.1 B

1
6 BJ

4.5 B
7.5
1.3 J



318.4
48.3 J

49.3
7

845.8

0.8 B 2.5 B


1.3 BJ

4.5 B 2.9 B
0.1 BJ 0.7 B
0.2 J 0.5
0.4


0.3 B 3.6
2.9 B 31.9

8.5
2.9

9.5 J 21.3
                NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                        FB = Field Blank
                        TB = Trip Blank
                         B = Blank Contamination
                         J = Estimated Value
                         R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
07-Har-90
TABLE 15
                                                                                                                                                      Page 4 of 10
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                                AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                               Rl PHASE 111 EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 15
                                                                                                                                                      Page 5 of 10
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 AMBIENT AIR -  ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                                RI PHASE III EVENT 1  ANALYTICAL RESyLTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-UWB-03 GH-AA-T-FRUUF-03 GH-AA-T-FRUUB-03 GH-AA-T-TPF-03 GH-AA-T-TPB-03 GH-AA-T-SAF-03 GH-AA-T-SAB-03
SAS NUMBER: E72A E71B E72B E73 E74 E75 E76
DATE SAMPLED: 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89
(ug/m3)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.6 B
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone 1.5 B
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone 5.8 B
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide 0.9 J
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride 142 J
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total) 0.8 J

178.8 J


3.7 B

3.6 B
1.4 J
4 J



0.6 J
201.1 J
1.3 J
6.7 J
19 J

2.8

3.1 B

4.7
1.5 B 67 1.8 B

2.4 B 3 B 3.6 B
7.3
0.6



0.2 J 12.3
24.6 J 29.1 J 27.4 J

106.1
11.2 J 18.4

0.5 B 36.3 0.7

1.8 B


1 B

2.5 B
1 J
0.2 J
0.4
0.3 J

0.2 J
13.9 J

7.2 J
2.5 J

0.8 J

0.7 B


-- R

2.6 B
0.5 J
0.2 J




18 J





                NOTES:  FR = Field Replicate
                        FB = Field Blank
                        TB = Trip Blank
                         B = Blank Contamination
                         J = Estimated Value
                         R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE  15
                                                                                                                                                      Page 6 of  10
                                                                             G&H  LANDFILL
                                                                 AMBIENT  AIR  -  ORGANIC ANALYSIS  (TENAX)
                                                                RI  PHASE  III  EVENT  1  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-FRSAF-03 GH-AA-T-FRSAB-03 GH-AA-T-DFF-03 GH-AA-T-OFB-03 GH-AA-T-DRF-03 GH-AA-T-DRB-03 GH-AA-T-FBF-03 GH-AA-T-TBF-03
SAS NUMBER: E77 E78 E79 E80 E81 E82 E83 E84
DATE SAMPLED: 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89 05-23-89
(ug/m3)
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Oisulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xytene (total)

1.6 B


2.5 BJ

3.3 B
1
0.7 J
0.4



41.5 J


6.6 J



0.7 B


-- R -- R

4.6 B 4.3 B
1.1 J
0.3 J 0.6 J


1 J
0.3
30.1 J 18.6 J

4.5
3.3

1.1

0.6 B 1.3 B


-- R 6.9 BJ

3.4 B 5.2 B
0.5 J 2.1
0.2 J 1.2

0.2 J

0.7
17.6 J 63.8 J

8.5
8

3.4

0.5 B 1.9


-- R -- R

4.7 B 1.1 B
0.4
0.2 J

0.2 J


20.7 J 0.5 B

0.4


0.2 BJ 0.1 J

1.9


2.4 J

1.9 B






0.5 B





                NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                        FB = Field Blank
                        TB = Trip Blank
                         B = Blank Contamination
                         J = Estimated Value
                         R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 15
                                                                                                                                                      Page 7 of 10
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                                Rl PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-D i ch I oroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-T-UWB-04 GH-AA-T-FRUUF-04 GH-AA-T-FRUUB-04 GH-AA-T-TPF-04 GH-AA-T-TPB-04 GH-AA-T-SAF-04 GH-AA-T-SAB-04 GH-AA-T-DFF-04
E86
05-24-89




-- R

3.7 B



0.2 J


11.6 J

2.4 B


0.1 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E87
05-24-89

3.3 B


4.2 J

4.1 B
5.9
0.5 B

0.4

2.2
29.4
3.1
16.3
7.7
0.4
11.3





Usable
E86 E89
05-24-89 05-24-89

1.1 B 3.7 B
0.3
2.9
2 J 10.9 BJ

3.8 B 10 BJ
11.8
0.5 B
3
3.7

17.3
5.4 B 20.5 J
3.9
39.5
8.6

63.6






E90 E91
05-24-89 05-24-89

0.5 B 3.1 B


-- R 5.9 BJ

6.4 BJ 9.9 BJ
0.5 5.9
0.5 B
0.4
0.4

0.2 5.9
10.5 J 33.2 J
2.8
22.3
8.9

1.6 27.2






E92 E93
05-24-89 05-24-89

0.7 B 2.6 B


2.5 BJ 4.5 BJ

7.9 BJ 8.1 BJ
5.7
0.2 B 1 B
0.4
0.3

0.9
23.3 J 52.4
2.7
12.4
6.2

3.5







-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 15
                                                                                                                                                      Page 8 of 10
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                                AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                               Rl PHASE III EVENT 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                               TABLE  15
                                                                                                                                                       Page 9 of 10
                                                                             G&H  LANDFILL
                                                                 AMBIENT  AIR  - ORGANIC ANALYSIS  (TENAX)
                                                               RI  PHASE  III  EVENT  1 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-T-TPB-05 GH-AA-T-SAF-05 GH-AA-T-SAB-05 GH-AA-T-DFF-05 GH-AA-T-DFB-05 GH-AA-T-FRDFF-05 GH-AA-T-FRDFB-05 GH-AA-T-DRF-05
E116 E117 E118 E119A E120A E119B E120B E121
05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89

0.9 B

4.3
3.6 BJ

9.7 BJ
0.2 BJ





2.7 B





FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not

1 B


3.5 BJ

6.3 BJ
1 B
1.1 B
0.3


8.4
57.9
0.6
17.4
10.5

40





Usable

0




5.2 BJ 5
0
0
0


0

.8




.6
.9
.4
.4


.9
3.6 B 23
0
5


4






.8
.6
3

.2







B




BJ 4 BJ
B 0.1 BJ
B


1 J
B
J 5.6 B

J
J

B 0.3 B







1




5
1
0
0
0


54

8
9

4







.5




.4
.7
.9
.4
.2
1
1
.5
1
.4
.9

.8







B




BJ
J
B

J
J
B
J

J
J

B







1




5.4 BJ 4
0.1 BJ 2
1
0
0

0
6.4 J 71

7
10

4







.5




.4
.3
.5
.4
.3

.9
.8
1
.7
.5

.6







B




BJ

J

J

B





B







-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 15
                                                                                                                                                      Page 10 of  10
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 AMBIENT AIR -  ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                                RI PHASE III EVENT 1  ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-DRB-05 GH
SAS NUMBER: E122
DATE SAMPLED: 05-25-89
(ug/ni5)
1,1,1-Trichtoroethane 10.5 B
1 , 1 -D i ch I oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl -2-Pentanone
Acetone 4.6 BJ
Benzene 0.4 B
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride 2.4 B
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene (total)
-AA-T-FRDRF-05 GH-AA-T-FRDRB-05 GH-AA-T-FBF-05 GH-AA-T-TBF-05
E123 E124 E125 E126
05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89 05-25-89

1.9 B




7.4 BJ
2.2
4.4 J
0.4


0.7 B
91.4
1
8
12.6

3.4 B

1.1 B 0.5 2.8


13.7 BJ 3.1 BJ 2.6 B

25.1 BJ 2.3 BJ 2.3 B
0.4 B 0.2 J
0.2 J



0.3
11.4 J 0.4 B 0.6 B

0.4


1.2
                NOTES:  FR = Field Replicate
                        FB = Field Blank
                        TB = Trip Blank
                         B = Blank Contamination
                         J = Estimated Value
                         R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
07-Mar-90                                                                 TABLE 16                                                             Page 1 of 2


                                                                         G&H LANDFILL
                                                            AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (PUFF)
                                                                RI PHASE III ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-P-UW-01
SAS NUMBER: E01
DATE SAMPLED: 05-31-89
(ug/m3)
Bis(2-ethylhexyl )phthalate
Phenol
Pyrene
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aroclor-1016
Aroclor-1221
Aroclor-1232
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Beta BHC
Chlordane (total)
Delta BHC
Dieldrin
Endosutfan 1
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Endrin Ketone
Gamma BHC (lindane)
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
GH-AA-P-SA-01 GH-AA-P-AL-01 GH-AA-P-BH-01 GH-AA-P-FB-01 GH-AA-P-UW-02
E02 E03 E04 EOS E06
05-31-89 05-31-89 05-31-89 05-31-89 06-01-89

93.9 JB
46.9 JB
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
                        NOTES:   B = Blank Contamination
                                 J = Estimated Value
                                 R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
07-Mar-90                                                                 TABLE  16                                                              Page  2 of 2


                                                                         G&H  LANDFILL
                                                            AMBIENT  AIR  -  ORGANIC ANALYSIS  (PUFF)
                                                                RI PHASE III  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS


                        SAMPLE:    GH-AA-P-SA-02      GH-AA-P-AL-02       GH-AA-P-FRAL-02      GH-AA-P-BH-02
                    SAS NUMBER:              E07                £08                   E09                E10
                  DATE SAMPLED:         06-01-89           06-01-89             06-01-89           06-01-89
             (ug/m3)
    Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate                           127.7 JB
    Phenol
    Pyrene
    4,4'-ODD
    4,4'-DDE
    4,4'-DOT
    Aldrin
    Alpha-BHC
    Aroclor-1016
    Aroctor-1221
    Aroclor-1232
    Aroclor-1242
    Aroclor-1248
    Aroclor-1254
    Aroclor-1260
    Beta BHC
    Chlordane (total)
    Delta BHC
    Dieldrin
    Endosulfan I
    Endosulfan II
    Endosulfan Sulfate
    Endrin
    Endrin Aldehyde
    Endrin Ketone
    Gamma BHC (lindane)
    Heptachlor
    Heptachlor Epoxide
    Methoxychlor
    Toxaphene
                        NOTES:    B = Blank Contamination
                                 J = Estimated Value
                                 R = Laboratory Data Not Usable

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE  17
                                                                                                                                                      Page  1 of 9
                                                                             G&H  LANDFILL
                                                                  AMBIENT  AIR - ORGANIC  ANALYSIS  (CMS)
                                                                 RI  PHASE  II  EVENT  2  ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-UUF-06 GH-AA-C-UUB-06 GH-AA-C-TPF-06 GH-AA-C-TPB-06 GH-AA-C-SAF-06 GH-AA-C-SAB-06 GH-AA-C-FRSAF-06
SAS NUMBER: E15 E16 E21 E22 E17 E18 E19
DATE SAMPLED: 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chtorome thane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)

-- R -- R -- R



0.1 J 0.04 j


0.7 J

0.02 J
1.3 J


15.2 J 1.1 BJ 0.8 BJ
2 BJ -- R 1.7 BJ
8.3 BJ 9.1 BJ 3.2 BJ
2.8 BJ
0.5 BJ
2.4 BJ 0.2 BJ 12.8
0.1 BJ

2 BJ 0.9 BJ

-- R -- R



0.7 J
1.6 J
0.4 J
0.5 J 5.2 J

0.6 J



7.9 J
0.4 BJ 1.2 BJ -- R
49.8 BJ 4.9 BJ 71.2 BJ
1 BJ 0.6 BJ
0.2 BJ
0.5 BJ 8.2 J 1.1 BJ
0.2 J

0.4 BJ 1.1 BJ

-- R



0.2 J




0.2 J

0.6 BJ


1.2 BJ
34 BJ
0.5 BJ
0.3 BJ
5.6 BJ
0.1 BJ

0.9 BJ
                    NOTES:  FR = Field Replicate
                            FB = Field Blank
                            TB = Trip Blank
                             B = Blank Contamination
                             J = Estimated Value
                             R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
                             * = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE  17
                                                                                                                                                      Page 2 of 9
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                                 AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
                                                                RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-FRSAB-06 GH-AA-C-OFB-06 GH-AA-C-DRF-06 GH-AA-C-DRB-06 GH-AA-C-FBF-06 GH-AA-C-TBF-06 GH-AA-C-UWF-07
SAS NUMBER: E20 E24 £25 E26 E27 E28 E43
DATE SAMPLED: 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-08-89
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Oichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)

-- R



0.4 J


2.2 J

0.3 J



20.4 J 195.6 J 255.7 J
-- R 0.3 BJ 0.4 BJ
26 BJ 12.5 BJ 45.3 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.2 BJ
0.2 J
0.3 BJ 0.4 BJ 12.9 J


0.2 BJ 0.2 BJ



0.8 BJ




7.1 J



0.6 BJ

27.8 J
0.3 BJ
19.4 BJ
0.4 BJ
0.2 J
0.7 BJ
0.2 J

0.2 BJ

-- R

0.4 J

1.4 J




1 J

0.3 J

231.2 BJ
0.1 BJ 0.04 BJ 1.3 J
3 J 54.2 J 132.9 BJ
0.1 BJ 0.2 BJ 3.5 BJ
0.3 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.4 BJ 15.6 J
0.3 J

0.1 BJ 2.1 BJ
                    NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                            FB = Field Blank
                            TB = Trip Blank
                             B = Blank Contamination
                             J = Estimated Value
                             R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
                             * = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 17
                                                                                                                                                       Page 3  of 9
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR -  ORGANIC ANALYSIS  (CMS)
                                                                 Rl  PHASE II  EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-C-UWB-07 GH-AA-C-TPF-07 GH-AA-C-TPB-07 GH-AA-C-SAF-07 GH-AA-C-SAB-07 GH-AA-C-DFF-07 GH-AA-C-DFB-07
SAS NUMBER: E44 E47 E48 E45 E46 £49 E50
DATE SAMPLED: 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-0 i ch I oroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)

-- R -- R



0.1 J


1.7 BJ

0.1 J



5.9 BJ
0.5 J 0.4 J
92.5 BJ 24.2 BJ
1 BJ 0.3 BJ
0.1 BJ
1.7 BJ 3.4 BJ
0.1 J

0.7 BJ 0.4 BJ

-- R -- R -- R



0.1 J


4.3 BJ 1.4 BJ

0.1 J 0.1 J


0.04 J
62.5 BJ 2.6 BJ 48.9 BJ
0.9 J
32.8 BJ 12 BJ 44 BJ
0.5 BJ 0.5 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.5 BJ 75.6 J 5.8 BJ
0.1 J 0.1 J

0.3 BJ 0.9 BJ 0.4 BJ

-- R



0.3 J


1.7 BJ

0.3 J


0.1 J
3.6 BJ
0.7 J
34.7 BJ
0.7 BJ
0.1 BJ
4 BJ


1.5 BJ

-- R












12.8 BJ

21.9 BJ
0.3 BJ

0.2 BJ



                    NOTES:  FR = Field Replicate
                            FB = Field Blank
                            TB = Trip Blank
                             B = Blank Contamination
                             J = Estimated Value
                             R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
                             * = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 17
                                                                                                                                                        Page  4  of 9
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                   AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
                                                                  RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
, 1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:






GH-AA-C-FRDFF-07 GH-AA-C-FRDFB-07
E51 E52
08-08-89 08-08-89





0.1 J


2.3 BJ

0.1 J 0.1 J
-- R -- R
8.1 J

59.9 BJ
0.6 J 0.3 J
9.9 BJ 14.1 BJ
0.7 BJ 11.6 J
0.6 J
8.1 J 0.7 BJ
0.1 J

0.6 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
GH-AA-C-DRF-07
E53
08-08-89





0.6 J


9 BJ

0.2 J
-- R


18.8 BJ
1 J
38.9 BJ
31.6 J

4.7 BJ










GH-AA-C-DRB-07 GH-AA-C-FBF-07 GH-AA-C-TBF-07 GH-AA-C-UUF-08
E54 E55 E56 E71
08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89 08-09-89

-- R



0.5 J


0.5 J

0.4 J
-- R -- R -- R
0.6 J 0.4 BJ

47 BJ 8.3 BJ 50 J 8 BJ
0.7 J
2.9 BJ 5 BJ 17.1 BJ 52.9 J
1.5 J 0.4 J 0.8 BJ
0.3 J
0.4 BJ 0.3 BJ 8.3 J


0.5 J








-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
                                                                                                                                                        Page 5 of  9
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CMS)
                                                                 Rl PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-UUB-08 GH-AA
E72
08-09-89

-- R












29.9 J
0.5 J
10.3 BJ
0.6 BJ

2.1 BJ


0.5 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
•C-TPF-08 GH-AA-C-TPB-08 GH-AA-C-FRTPF-08 GH-AA-C-FRTPB-08 GH-AA-C-SAF-08 GH-AA-C-SAB-08
E75 E76
08-09-89 08-09-89

-- R -- R



1 J


3.1 J 3.2 J

0.3 J
-- R
0.2 BJ

5.8 BJ
1 BJ 0.3 BJ
50 BJ 1.7 BJ
0.6 BJ 1 BJ
1.7 BJ
11.7 J 0.3 BJ
0.1 J

1.1 BJ





Usable
E77
08-09-89

-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R






E78 E73
08-09-89 08-09-89

-- R -- R



4.6 J


73.1 J
3.8 J
1.5 J
-- R


35.3 J
2.6 BJ
14.5 BJ 200.9 J
1.4 BJ 3.9 BJ
2.7 BJ
0.5 BJ 12.3 J
0.7 BJ

3.1 BJ






E74
08-09-89

-- R






30.1 J


-- R




146.1 J
1.8 BJ

0.5 BJ


0.5 BJ






* = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 17
                                                                                                                                                       Page 6 of 9
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
                                                                 RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

-------
07-Har-90
                                                                              TABLE 17
                                                                                                                                                        Page 7 of  9
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
                                                                 RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Oichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tet rach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-TPF-09 GH-AA-C-TPB-09 GH-AA-C-SAF-09 GH-AA-C-SAB-09 GH-AA-C-DFF-09 GH-AA-C-DFB-09 GH-AA-C-DRF-09 GH-AA-C-DRB-09
E103
08-10-89

-- R

0.3 J

0.2 BJ








13.7 J
3.4 J
23.6 BJ
15.5 J
0.4 J
2.7 BJ
0.2 BJ

8.2 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E104
08-10-89

-- R








0.2 J



0.6 BJ
3 J
13.7 BJ
4.7 J

1.6 BJ
0.2 BJ

6.9 J





Usable
E101
08-10-89





0.6 J


2.8 J

0.2 J




0.7 J
24.4 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.6 J
9.2 J
0.2 BJ

0.4 BJ






E102 E105
08-10-89 08-10-89

-- R
4.3 J


0.2 BJ




0.1 J



1.4 BJ
0.1 J
8.8 BJ 4.1 BJ
4.4 J
0.7 J
0.9 BJ 2.7 BJ
0.3 BJ

1 BJ






E106
08-10-89

-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.1 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
31.4 J
-- R
40.8 BJ
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.2 BJ
-- R
-- R






E107
08-10-89

•-- R



0.2 BJ


20.5 J





8.6 J
1.3 J
25.9 BJ
0.2 BJ
0.4 J
5.4 J


0.8 BJ






E108
08-10-89

-- R










0.5 J

27 J

25.9 BJ


1.2 BJ









* = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 17
                                                                                                                                                       Page 8 of 9
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                   AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
                                                                  RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1. ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, ,1-Trichloroethane
1, ,2-Trichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethane
1, -Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-0 i ch I oroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chtorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach I oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:






GH-AA-C-FRDRF-09 GH-AA-C-FRDRB-09 GH-AA-C-FBF-09 GH-AA-C-TBF-09 GH-AA-C-UWF-10 GH-AA-C-UUB-10 GH-AA-C-FRUWF-10
E109 E110
08-10-89 08-10-89

37.2 J



0.03 BJ


4.4 J 1.9 J





1.6 J
0.1 J
7 BJ 10.7 BJ
8.8 J 1.1 BJ

0.4 BJ 0.3 BJ
1.1 BJ

6 J 0.5 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E111 E112 E127 E128
08-10-89 08-10-89 08-11-89 08-11-89

-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.1 J
-- R
-- R
-- R 0.9 BJ*
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R 1.3 BJ* 5.4 BJ*
-- R 0.3 J*
1.2 J 13.8 J 7.5 BJ* 7.9 BJ*
0.3 J 0.4 BJ* 0.2 BJ*
-- R
0.3 BJ 0.3 BJ 1 BJ* 0.2 BJ*
0.2 BJ 0.1 BJ*
-- R
-- R 0.4 J 0.5 J*







E129
08-11-89





0.2 J








0.1 BJ

10.7 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.3 J
1.2 BJ
0.1 BJ










-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 17
                                                                                                                                                        Page 9 of 9
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL
                                                                  AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (CHS)
                                                                 RI PHASE II EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
, 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
, 1 -D i ch I oroethane
, 1 -0 i ch I oroet hene
,2-Dich I oroethane
, 2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach 1 oroet hene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-C-TPF-10 GH-AA-C-SAF-10 GH-AA-C-SAB-10 GH-AA-C-DFF-10 GH-AA-C-DFB-10 GH-AA-C-DRF-10 GH-AA-C-DRB-10 GH-AA-C-TBF-10
E133 E131
08-11-89 08-11-89

-- R

1.4 BJ

1.1 J 0.3 J


3.9 J



1 J
0.4 J
11.3 BJ 2.1 BJ
2.8 J
45.2 BJ 7 BJ
7.7 BJ
0.9 BJ
4.5 BJ 5.2 BJ


7.2 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
E132 E135 E136
08-11-89 08-11-89 08-11-89

-- R



0.6 J


0.6 BJ

0.2 J

0.5 J 0.4 J

0.6 BJ 4.4 BJ 4.2 BJ
0.2 J 0.8 J
1.7 BJ 2.5 BJ 28.8 BJ
0.3 BJ 0.9 BJ 2.3 BJ
0.6 BJ
0.2 BJ 0.8 BJ 6.2 BJ
0.4 J

0.2 J






E137
08-11-89

-- R

0.2 BJ

0.1 J








0.3 BJ
0.7 J
2.5 BJ
0.4 BJ
0.5 BJ
7.3 J
0.2 J

0.7 BJ






E138 E140
08-11-89 08-11-89

-- R -- R







23.3 J




0.2 BJ 7.1 BJ
0.5 J
2.3 BJ 19.2 BJ
1.2 BJ 2.3 BJ

4.6 BJ 0.7 J
0.2 J

1.6 BJ






                               = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE 18
                                                                                                                                                   Page 1  of  10
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                               AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                              RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
, 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
, 2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
. 2 - D i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch t oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulf ide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Hethylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:






GH-AA-T-UUF-06 GH-AA-T-UWB-06 GH-AA-T-TPF-06 GH-AA-T-TPB-06 GH-AA-T-SAF-06 GH-AA-T-SAB-06 GH-AA-T-FRSAF-06
E01 E02
08-07-89 08-07-89


0.9 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R
1.9 J



0.8 J 0.1 BJ
0.7 J



15.2 J


1.5 J
26.3 J 10.6 BJ


15.7 J
0.2 J


6.5 J
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E07
08-07-89








-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.7 J



4.3 J
1.5 J

3.4 J

9.5 J


0.4 J
31.2 J

0.4 J
5.6 J



1.8 J







E08 E03 E04
08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89


0.6 J





-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
0.2 J 1.7 J 0.4 J



0.7 J 0.4 J
0.5 J



5.8 J 10.6 J


0.8 J
1.9 BJ 18.2 BJ 2.9 BJ


16.1 J
0.1 J


1.5 J







EOS
08-07-89








-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
0.4 J



0.8 J
0.1 J






0.9 J
55.1 J

0.2 J
18.2 J



1.1 J








-------
07-Mar-90                                                                   TABLE  18                                                               Page  2 of  10


                                                                           G&H  LANDFILL
                                                                AMBIENT  AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                               RI  PHASE  III  EVENT  2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-FRSAB-06 GH-AA-T-DFF-06 GH-AA-T-DFB-06 GH-AA-T-DRF-06 GH-AA-T-DRB-06 GH-AA-T-FBF-06 GH-AA-T-TBF-06
SAS NUMBER: E06 E09 E10 Ell E12 £13 E14
DATE SAMPLED: 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89 08-07-89
(ug/m3)
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
, 1 -D i ch I oroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromod i ch I oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)


1.5 J





-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
0.6 J 0.3 J



0.1 BJ 0.2 BJ
0.9 J






1 J
7.7 BJ 16.5 BJ
0.2 BJ

10.8 J 0.6 J
0.4 J 0.6 J


4.6 J


1.2 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.5 J 0.1 J



0.2 BJ 0.3 J
1 J



10.4 J


0.6 J
18.7 BJ 5.6 BJ
0.2 BJ

8 J
0.2 J


2.5 J








-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.1 BJ



0.04 BJ








2 J
0.3 BJ





0.1 BJ
                   NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                           FB = Field Blank
                           TB = Trip Blank
                            B = Blank Contamination
                            J = Estimated Value
                            R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
                            * = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE  18
                                                                                                                                                   Page 3 of 10
                                                                            G&H  LANDFILL
                                                               AMBIENT AIR  - ORGANIC ANALYSIS  (TENAX)
                                                              Rl  PHASE  III  EVENT  2 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Oichloroethene
1 , 2 - D i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch loromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:






GH-AA-T-UUF-07 GH-AA-T-UWB-07 GH-AA-T-TPF-07 GH-AA-T-TPB-07 GH-AA-T-SAF-07 GH-AA-T-SAB-07 GH-AA-T-DFF-07
E29 E30
08-08-89 08-08-89


0.6 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.7 BJ



0.3 BJ 0.5 BJ
0.3






0.5 J
13.6 J 3.5 J


7.4 J



2.7 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E33 E34 E31
08-08-89 08-08-89 08-08-89

•#
1.3 J 1.2 J

k



-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
0.6 BJ 0.2 BJ 1.2 J


0.6 J
0.3 BJ 0.2 BJ 5.2 BJ
0.6 0.4 J
0.1 J

0.1 J



0.4 J 1.5 J
15.5 J 16 J 9.7 J
6.3 J
0.2 J 0.2 J
8 J 30.6 J
0.1 J
1.8 J

2.1 BJ 15.3 J







E32 E35
08-08-89 08-08-89


1.2 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.5 BJ


0.6 J
4.9 BJ 0.3 BJ
0.6 J



2.7 J


0.7 J
16.2 J
5.6 J
0.2 J
0.2 J 9.8 J


0.5 J
6 J 4.8 J








-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE 18
                                                                                                                                                   Page 4  of  10
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                                AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                               RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
. 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1-Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
, 2 -0 i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch I oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:






GH-AA-T-DFB-07 GH-AA-T-FRDFF-07 GH-AA-T-FRDFB-07 GH-AA-T-ORF-07 GH-AA-T-DRB-07 GH-AA-T-FBF-07 GH-AA-T-TBF-07
E36 E37
08-08-89 08-08-89


1.1 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-• R -- R
0.2 BJ 0.6 BJ



0.3 BJ 0.2 BJ
0.6






0.3 J
14.7 J 11.4 J

0.1 J
5.2 J



2.1 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
* = Estimated Sample Volume
E38 £39
08-08-89 08-08-89


1.1 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
•- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.6 BJ



0.2 BJ 0.3 BJ
0.5 J






0.8 J
1.9 J 15.9 J
0.7 BJ
0.1 J
0.4 J 5.9 J



5 J







E40 E41 £42
08-08-89 08-08-89 08-06-89

-- R -- R -- R






-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R


0.5 BJ










3.3 J















-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE  18
                                                                                                                                                  Page 5  of  10
                                                                           G&H  LANDFILL
                                                               AMBIENT AIR -  ORGANIC  ANALYSIS  (TENAX)
                                                              Rl PHASE III EVENT  2 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-AA-T-UUF-08 GH-AA-T-UUB-08 GH-AA-T-TPF-08 GH-AA-T-TPB-08 GH-AA-T-FRTPF-08 GH-AA-T-FRTPB-08 GH-AA-T-SAF-08
SAS NUMBER: E57 £58 E61 E62 E63 E64 E59
DATE SAMPLED: 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89 08-09-89
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1.1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Oichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch 1 oromethane
Brcxnoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)

-- R
4.8 J





-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
4.1 J




1.4 J






2.3 J
11.5 BJ

4.8 J
28.2 J
1 J


11 J

-- R -- R -- R
1 J

0.5 J



-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
-- R -- R -- R
3.5 J



0.9 J
0.6 J
0.3 B





1.7 J
13.2 BJ 5.4 BJ

1.7 J
9.9 J
0.7 J


9.1 J


2.2 J





-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.7 J




0.6 J







8.6 BJ
0.8 BJ
2.5 J
6.1 J
0.5 J


0.6 BJ

-- R
4.5 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
3.9 J



1.9 J
1.2 J






10.6 J
0.8 BJ 205.9 J
0.2 BJ 1.4 BJ
4.8 J
35.9 J
1.3 J


1.3 BJ 58.2 J
                   NOTES:   FR = Field Replicate
                           FB = Field Blank
                           TB = Trip Blank
                            B = Blank Contamination
                            J = Estimated Value
                            R = Laboratory Data Not Usable
                            * = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE 18
                                                                                                                                                  Page 6 of 10
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                               AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                              RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE 18
                                                                                                                                                  Page 7 of  10
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                               AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS  (TENAX)
                                                              RI PHASE 111 EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-AA-T-UUF-09
ESS
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-UUB-09
E86
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-TPF-09
E89
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-TPB-09
E90
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-SAF-09
E87
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-SAB-09
£88
08-10-89
GH-AA-T-DFF-09
E91
08-10-89
          
-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE 18
                                                                                                                                                   Page  8  of  10
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                               AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                              RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-D i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodi ch 1 oromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chi oromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch loromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-T-DFB-09 GH-AA-T-DRF-09 GH-AA-T-DRB-09 GH-AA-T-FRDRF-09 GH-AA-T-FRDRB-09 GH-AA-T-FBF-09 GH-AA-T-TBF-09
E92
08-10-89








-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R




















0.3 BJ
FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E93 E94
08-10-89 08-10-89


1.9 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
2.9 J



0.2 J
0.7 J


0.1 J



2.3 BJ
15 BJ 3.5 BJ

1.5 J
13.3 BJ
0.2 BJ


12.9 BJ





Usable
E95
08-10-89


2 J





-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
3 J




0.7 J






2.1 BJ
105 BJ

1.3 J
14.6 BJ
.3 BJ


12.3 BJ






E96 E97
08-10-89 08-10-89








-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.4











0.5 J
1.6 BJ 17.5 J


3.3 J
0.2 J


3 J






E98
08-10-89








-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R













1.5 J













* = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                            TABLE 18
                                                                                                                                                  Page 9 of 10
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                                AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                               RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                  SAMPLE:
              SAS NUMBER:
            DATE SAMPLED:
GH-AA-T-UUF-10
          E113
      08-11-89
GH-AA-T-UWB-10
          E1U
      08-11-89
GH-AA-T-FRUUF-10
            E115
        08-11-89
GH-AA-T-FRUWB-10
            E116
        08-11-89
GH-AA-T-TPF-10
          £119
      08-11-89
GH-AA-T-TPB-10
          E120
      08-11-89
GH-AA-T-SAF-10
          E117
      08-11-89
          (ug/m3)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
BromodichIoromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chioromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromochIoromethane
       0.5 BJ
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
       0.7 J*
       1.5 J*
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
                          1.8 BJ
          -- R
          -- R
          -- R
          -- R
         1.8 J
                                           0.6 J
          -- R
          -- R
          -- R
          -- R
                                             0.3  J
                                                                              0.4 BJ
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
       0.5 J
                                            0.2 J
                                            0.3 J
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
                                         0.04 J
                                                                                               1.9 BJ
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
        -- R
       1.6 J
                                        0.8 J
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:















FR =
FB =
TB =
B =
J =
R =
* -
1.3 BJ*
220.8 J* 4.6 BJ*

0.1 J*
10.4 BJ* 0.1 BJ*
0.3 J*


7.9 BJ*
Field Replicate
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Blank Contamination
Estimated Value
Laboratory Data Not Usable
Estimated Sample Volume
1.8 BJ
14 BJ

0.8 J
15.7 BJ
0.3 J


7 BJ







0.5 BJ
3.1 BJ 25 BJ

0.2 J
5.6 BJ
0.1 J


3.1 BJ







1.5 BJ
1.8 BJ 12.7 BJ
0.1 BJ
0.6 J
1.5 BJ 16.6 BJ



6.7 BJ








-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 18
                                                                                                                                                  Page 10 of 10
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                                AMBIENT AIR - ORGANIC ANALYSIS (TENAX)
                                                               RI PHASE III EVENT 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE:
SAS NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/niJ)
, 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethane
, 1 -D i ch loroethene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethene
, 2-0 i ch I oropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachtoride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
D i bromoch I oromet hane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrach loroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene (total)
NOTES:





GH-AA-T-SAB-10 GH-AA-T-DFF-10 GH-AA-T-DFB-10 GM-AA-T-DRF-10 GH-AA-T-DRB-10 GH-AA-T-FBF-10 GH-AA-T-TBF-10
E118
08-11-89








-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R





0.1 J










3.5 BJ




FR = Field Replicate
FB = Field Blank
TB = Trip Blank
B = Blank Contamination
J = Estimated Value
R = Laboratory Data Not
E121
08-11-89


2.2 BJ





-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.8 J



0.3 J
0.8 J






1.2 J
10.2 BJ

1 J
17.4 BJ
0.3 J


5.7 J





Usable
E122 E123
08-11-89 08-11-89


0.3 BJ 2.1 BJ





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
0.8 J 3.9 J




0.7 J






1.9 J
12 BJ

0.8 J
4.5 BJ 18 BJ
0.3 J


10.8 J






E124
08-11-89

1.6 J
4.4 J
3.7 J

0.8 J
3.9 J
0.3 J
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
1.2 J
0.1 J



14.4 J

72 J
264 J
480 J
0.2 J
0.2 J
0.7 J
320 J
0.6 BJ
8 J
33.6 BJ
27.2 J


3 J






E125 E126
08-11-89 08-11-89


0.8 J





-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-• R -- R
-- R -- R













3.6 J


10.8 J










* = Estimated Sample Volume

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                     Page 1  of  22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 . 1 ,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1, 2- Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyt-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3-D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH01A-03 GH-GWGH01B-03
EEY61 EEY62
MEBF61 MEBF62
10-18-89 10-17-89

142 JB

39.5 J 13.4
190 J 246

122000 74500



6930 J 783
2.8 JB
32900 23900
120 26

23300 2880 J


44300 15800
-- R

780 570 J










3 J






4 JB






GH-GUGH02A-03
EEY39
MEBF39
10-18-89



34.6 J
383

85000
5.4 J

17.4 JB
6410 J

32700
97.7
42 B
42200


80400
-- R

256










12








1 JB




GH-GUGH03B-03
EEYOO
MEBFOO
10-19-89



15.3 J
658

109000



4220 J

58600
60.4
29.6 JB
19600


87600
-- R

25.8 B





640











7 JB




300

GH-GUGH03C-03 GH-GUGH04B-03
EEY01 EEY32
MEBF01 MEBF32
10-19-89 10-19-89

4240

6.6 J 15.1 J
83.6 J 226

19200 42000
13.4

13.7 JB 9.4 JB
6960 J 16.1 JB
3.9 JB
7060 39000
93.7 12.4 J
85.3 B
2410 J 4670 J


18300 53500
-- R -- R
13.6 J
75.3 86.4






-- R


8 JB














GH-GUGH08B-03 GH-GUGH09A-03
EEY02 EEY03
MEBF02 MEBF03
10-17-89 10-16-89

9.2 JB

2.3 JB 32.8
68.4 J 328
5.1 B
90600 93200



53.8 JB 2970
2.6 JB
25600 39800
232 393
20.4 J
2160 JB 36900


87200 81600

4.5 JB 3.9 JB
18.4 JB 10.8 JB










2 J

3 J

1 J


1 JB

3 JB





-------
07-Mar-90                                                                    TABLE 19                                                               Page 2 of 22


                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS

                   SAMPLE:    GH-GUGH01A-03   GH-GWGH01B-03   GH-GUGH02A-03   GH-GUGH03B-03   GH-GUGH03C-03   GH-GWGH04B-03   GH-GUGH08B-03   GH-GUGH09A-03
               OTR NUMBER:            EEY61           EEY62           EEY39           EEYOO           EEY01           EEY32           EEY02           EEY03
               ITR NUMBER:           MEBF61          MEBF62          MEBF39          MEBFOO          MEBF01          MEBF32          HEBF02          MEBF03
             DATE SAMPLED:         10-18-89        10-17-89        10-18-89        10-19-89        10-19-89        10-19-89        10-17-89        10-16-89
     ___


1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-d i chIorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-noethy (naphthalene
2-methyI phenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol                                                        11 J
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid                                                                                                                          2  J
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether                                              7 J                                                                            3 J
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
D i benzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate                                                                                                                                     2 J
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol                                                                                3 J             3 J

Aroclor-1260
4.4'-ODD


                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                     Page 3 of 22
                                                                           G&H  LANDFILL
                                                              RI  PHASE  III ROUND  3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 - D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GWGH09B-03
EEY04
MEBF04
10-16-89



34.6
301

79800



2SOO

45700
239

33200


84500

3.8 JB
16.5 JB

















1 JB






GH-GUGH12A-03
EEY40
MEBF40
10-18-89



35.9 J
230

121000



12800 J

36400
205

13500


55100
-- R

14.6 JB





4 J




10





1 J







GH-FRGUGH12A-03
EEY74
MEBF74
10-18-89



32.2 J
241

124000



13000 J

37300
214

13900


55800
-- R

12.5 JB





4 J




10













GH-GUGH14A-03
EEY05
MEBF05
10-16-89

15.3 JB

1 JB
25.6 J

81800


3.3 JB
41.9 JB

16100
12.2 J
16.6 J
1680 JB


111000

3.8 JB
6.8 JB
























GH-GUGH15B-03
EEY06
MEBF06
10-16-89

13.3 JB

3.4 JB
138 J

79700
5.7 J


24.7 JB

22400
64.2

1650 JB


27200

3.5 JB

























GH-GUGH15C-03
EEY07
MEBF07
10-16-89

23.4 JB

10.9
40 J

13400
29.6

1.7 JB
114 B

10000
2.6 JB
26.4 J
6200


65100

2.9 JB
3.1 JB
























GH-GUGH19B-03 GH-GUGH22A-03
EEY08 EEY63
MEBF08 HEBF63
10-16-89 10-18-89



3.8 JB
71.2 J 132 J

69700 98500



18.4 JB 76.9 JB

18200 39300
154 84.4

1620 JB 3680 J


21500 59300
-- R
3.7 JB
23.8 B 49.4





2 J






3 J






1 JB





-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 19
Page 4 of 22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS

                   SAMPLE:    GH-GWGH09B-03   GH-GUGH12A-03 GH-FRGUGH12A-03   GH-GUGHUA-03   GH-GUGH15B-03   GH-GWGH15C-03    GH-GUGH19B-03   GH-GWGH22A-03
               OTR NUMBER:            EEY04           EEY40           EEY74           EEY05           EEY06           EEY07            EEY08           EEY63
               ITR NUMBER:           MEBF04          MEBF40          MEBF74          MEBF05          MEBF06          MEBF07           MEBF08          MEBF63
             DATE SAMPLED:         10-16-89        10-18-89        10-18-89        10-16-89        10-16-89        10-16-89         10-16-89        10-18-89
     _____


1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-di chlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyt) ether              1 J
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate                      2 J                                             2 J                             1  J
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol                                                                                                                2  J

Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD
                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE  19
                                                                                                                                                      Page 5 of 22
                                                                            G&H  LANDFILL
                                                               Rl  PHASE  III  ROUND  3  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                          MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 , 2, 2- Tet rach I oroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chi oroethane
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH22B-03 GH-GUGH24A-03 GH-GWGH24A-03 RE GH-GUGH26A-03
EEY64 EEY41 EEY41RE EEY42
MEBF64 MEBF41 NA MEBF42
10-18-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89



82.7
35.3 J 544

75200 128000
4.9 J


17100

411 JB 34900
98.5

3360 J 31600


28500 74800
-- R
7.9 J 7.3 J
60.1 599










470


12 J


480
11 JB

2300 J



2900 J

NA
NA
NA 146
NA 575
NA
NA 147000
NA
NA
NA
NA 11700
NA
NA 27900
NA 341
NA
NA 29000
NA
NA
NA 52700
NA
NA
NA 39.7 B










370 D 190


3 J
120

330 D
51 DJB 2 JB

1700 D 2 JB



2000 D
GH-GUGH27A-03
EEY09
MEBF09
10-18-89

19.4 JB


24 J

111000
13.9
3.3 J

1320

24300
805
288
3720 J


42100

4.9 JB
13 JB
9

4 J




7 J
8 J


6



3 J

4 BJ

1 BJ
2 J



GH-GUGH28A-03 GH-GUGH28B-03 GH-FRGUGH28B-03
EEY10 EEY11 EEY71
HEBF10 MEBF11 MEBF71
10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89

10.2 JB

3.6 JB
28.8 J 113 J

74300 73000

2.5 J

348 142 B

17900 18500
162 71.7
89.7
13000 1720 JB


65100 22200

2.5 JB 3.7 JB
32.6 B 12.9 JB
9

5 J

3 J


8 J
8 J


2 J



1 J

3 JB 3 JB


2 J




98.6 JB

2.9 JB
114 J

68500



222 B
-- R
18000
68.1

1140 J


23000


7.8 JB

















2 JB







-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                    Page 6 of 22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 , 2 - d i ch I orobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1, A -dich I orobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy I naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo( b) f I uorant hene
Benzo(ghi )perylene
Benzo( k ) f I uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
I ndeno( 1 , 2 , 3 - cd ) py rene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4.4'-DDD









GH-GUGH228-03 GH-GWGH24A-03 GH-GUGH24A-03 RE GH-GUGH26A-03 GH-GUGH27A-03 GH-GUGH28A-03 GH-GUGH28B-03 GH-FRGUGH28B-03
EEY64 EEY41
MEBF64 MEBF41
10-18-89 10-19-89


3 J


15
8 J
5 J

65
34






110 J
4 JB

3 J



8 J
69

5 J


NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J = Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
EEY41RE EEY42 EEY09 EEY10 EEY11 EEY71
NA MEBF42 HEBF09 HEBF10 MEBF11 MEBF71
10-19-89 10-19-89 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 11 J
NA 2 JB
NA
NA 2 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 5 J
NA
NA




usable




                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mac-90
                                                                             TABLE 19
Page 7 of 22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/t)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans- 1, 3-D ichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH29A-03
EEY12
MEBF12
10-16-89

9.2 JB

16.7
229

121000



2450

26000
659

9020


85200

4.6 JB
9.4 JB
























GH-FRGUCH29A-03
EEY69
MEBF69
10-16-89

66.8 JB

15
219

112000



2450
2.7 JB
24400
609

8050


79900


18.5 JB
























GH-GWGH29B-03 GH-GUGH29C-03
EEY13 EEY14
MEBF13 MEBF14
10-16-89 10-16-89

12.2 JB 163 JB

4 JB 31
86.8 J 16.8 JB

68700 7600



531 67.4 JB

20400 3770 J
221 2.2 JB

2790 J 3270 J


24100 57600

4.1 JB 15.5 JB
6.3 JB












8




1 JB






GH-GUGH30A-03
EEY15
HEBF15
10-17-89



78.4
1240

143000

2 J

9170

67300
137
17.3 J
49700


117000

4.9 JB
13.2 JB










7



3 J









GH-GUGH30B-03
EEY16
MEBF16
10-17-89

9.2 JB

46.4
1410

138000

1.7 J

8560

68900
66.9

42900


119000

6.1 JB
5.5 JB










19













GH-GWGH31A-03
EEY17
MEBF17
10-17-89


14.3 JB
51.5
568

126000

6.1 J

19000

97600
136
27.9 J
37600


127000

4 JB
7.4 JB










5


1 J










GH-GUGH31B-03
EEY18
MEBF18
10-17-89

15.3 JB

55.8
1360

145000

1.8 J

13100

91400
96

66300

2.1 J
159000

5.4 JB
6 JB










18

3 J












-------
07-Mar-90                                                                    TABLE 19                                                               Page 8 of 22


                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS

                   SAMPLE:    GH-GWGH29A-03 GH-FRGUCH29A-03   GH-GWGH29B-03   GH-GWGH29C-03   GH-GUGH30A-03   GH-GUGH30B-03   GH-GUGH31A-03   GH-GUGH31B-03
               OTR NUMBER:            EEY12           EEY69           EEY13           EEY14           EEY15           EEY16           EEY17           EEY1B
               ITR NUMBER:           MEBF12          MEBF69          MEBF13          MEBF14          MEBF15          MEBF16          MEBF17          MEBF18
             DATE SAMPLED:         10-16-89        10-16-89        10-16-89        10-16-89        10-17-89        10-17-89        10-17-89        10-17-89
     ___


1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1, A-d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy{naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(Z-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-ni trosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol                                                                                                                2  J              5  J

Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD


                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                      Page 9 of  22
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                               RI  PHASE  III  ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                          MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/t)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
A-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichl oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH31C-03 GH-GUGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 RE
EEY19 EEY28 EEY47 EEY47RE
MEBF19 MEBF28 MEBF47 NA
10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89

124 JB 156 JB 141 JB

10.1 46.6 53.7
16.8 JB 425 418

4840 J 91400 91700
3.5 J
1.1 JB

60 JB 11200 10700
-- R -- R
764 JB 43800 44100
1.7 JB 192 188

11800 45500 45500


70400 107000 106000

3.3 JB 2.6 J 3.2 J
7.2 JB 28.2 JB 22.6 JB










12 12






3 JB

1 JB 1 JB 20 B





NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUGH33A-03 GH-GUGH33A-03 RE
EEY20 EEY20RE
MEBF20 NA
10-19-89 10-19-89



47.1 J
427

99800

10.6 J

12200 J

45600
65.8
32.4 JB
49200


95800
-- R

30.6 B










23



4 J

7






480 J

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






-- R



19 D





6 DJ






380 D
GH-GUGH33B-03
EEY29
MEBF29
10-17-89

166 JB

285
928

111000

3.2 JB

11300
2.3 JB
57300
36.9
16.1 J
30900


105000

3.7 J
11.1 JB










16



4 J







8 J
33
GH-GWGH34A-03
EEY21
MEBF21
10-17-89


12.4 JB
27.5
179 J

91100

2.1 J

2800

33200
572
16.6 J
33600


57000

4.2 JB
8.9 JB

























-------
07-Mar-90                                                                    TABLE 19                                                               Page 10 of 22


                                             '                              G&H LANDFILL
                                                              RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1 , 4 - d i ch I orobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroani line
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo( b) f I uoranthene
Benzo(ghi )perylene
Benzo( k ) f I uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthatate
Di-n-butyt phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylaroine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD
GH-GUGH31C-03 GH-GWGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 GH-FRGUGH32A-03 RE GH-GWGH33A-03 GH-GUGH33A-03 RE GH-GWGH33B-03
EEY19 EEY28 EEY47 EEY47RE EEY20 EEY20RE EEY29
MEBF19 MEBF28 MEBF47 NA MEBF20 NA MEBF29
10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-17-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-17-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-- R -- R NA
-- R -- R NA
-- R •- R NA
-- R -- R NA
NA
NA
3 JB NA 5 JB
-- R -- R NA
NA
NA 1 J
-- R -- R NA
-- R -- R NA
NA
NA
NA
2 J NA
NA
NA
GH-GUGH34A-03
EEY21
MEBF21
10-17-89






























                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE  19
                                                                                                                                                    Page  11 of 22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              RI PHASE III  ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
GH-GUGH34B-03
EEY22
MEBF22
10-17-89

19.3 JB

12
139 J

76800

2.3 J

1080

21400
79.5

816 JB


5530


6.9 JB






GH-GUGH35A-03
EEY30
MEBF30
10-17-89

141 JB

61.8
929

109000
3.1 J
3.1 JB

13800
-- R
33800
107

38200


84700

4.1 J
11.4 JB



2 J


GH-GUGH35B-03
EEY31
MEBF31
10-17-89

74.8 JB

1.6 JB
102 J

111000



6020
-- R
37300
42.3

2700 J


57000

2.8 J
23.4 JB






GH-GUGH36A-03
EEY23
MEBF23
10-18-89

180 JB

5.4 JB
177 J

128000
11.7
7.1 J

1890
-- R
25700
640
17.6 J
8210


405000

3.5 J
101 J






GH-GUGH36B-03
EEY24
MEBF24
10-18-89

134 JB

6.8 JB
322

159000


1.1 JB
1900
-- R
42200
101

1860 J


228000

3.9 J
14.8 JB






GH-GUGH37A-03
EEY25
MEBF25
10-17-89

151 JB

25.9
891

116000



3290
-- R
29700
335

13700


91600


31.8 JB






GH-GUGH39A-03
EEY33
MEBF33
10-18-89



56.5 J
335

76500



5400 J

28600
386
27.2 JB
23700


53800
-- R

51






GH-GUGH40A-03
EEY73
MEBF73
10-18-89



35.2 J
349

84600



3330 J

56100
47.1

44200


91100
-- R

22 B






2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
DibromochIoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans-1,3-D i chIoropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
27
25
 3 JB
                                2 J
                 2 JB
 3 JB

 1 JB

19
                                                2 JB
                                                                6 B
                                                                                               18

-------
07-Mar-90                                                                    TABLE  19                                                               Page 12 of  22


                                                                           G&H  LANDFILL
                                                              RI  PHASE III  ROUND 3  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH34B-03 GH-GWGH35A-03 GH-GWGH35B-03 GH-GWGH36A-03 GH-GWGH36B-03 GH-GUGH37A-03 GH-GUGH39A-03 GH-GUGH40A-03
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
EEY22
MEBF22
10-17-89
EEY30
MEBF30
10-17-89
EEY31
MEBF31
10-17-89
EEY23
MEBF23
10-18-89
EEY24
MEBF24
10-18-89
EEY25
MEBF25
10-17-89
EEY33
MEBF33
10-18-89
EEY73
MEBF73
10-18-89
     (ug/l)

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-d i chIorobenzene
1,3-dich I orobenzene
1,4 -d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether                                                                                                                            11
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate           13 B
D i benzo(a,h)anth racene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol                                                2 J

Aroclor-1260
4,4'-ODD


                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                     Page 13 of  22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                       MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH40B-03 GH-FRGWGH40B-03 GH-GUGH41B-03 GH-GUGH42B-03 GH-GUGH43A-03 GH-GWGH43A-03 DL
OTR NUMBER: EEY51 EET27 EEY34 EEY35 EEY52 EEY52DL
ITR NUMBER: MEBF51 MEBF27 MEBF34 ME8F35 MEBF52 NA
DATE SAMPLED: 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-18-89 10-19-89 10-17-89 10-17-89
(ug/t)
Aluminum 301 B 173 JB
Antimony
Arsenic 29.2 J 30.5 J 92.5 J 27.2 J 2.7 JB
Barium 1530 1540 680 302 89.4 J
Cadmium
Calcium 87000 86300 104000 77400 59000
Chromium
Cobalt 1.6 JB
Copper 19.6 JB 4 JB
Iron 3200 J 3220 J 10100 J 1830 J 42.3 JB
Lead -• R
Magnesium 60600 60600 47100 24300 23400
Manganese 14.2 J 11.6 J 31.1 40.4 383
Nickel 37.8 JB 43 B 44 B 33 J
Potassium 53300 53000 19600 1460 J 22500
Selenium
Si Iver
Sodium 86200 87900 75800 22900 102000
Thallium -- R -- R -- R 4 JB
Vanadium
Zinc 43.3 B 50.5 22 B 28.8 B 38.4 JB
1,2,2-Tetrachtoroethane
1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-Trichloroethane
1-Dichloroethane
2-Dichloroethane
2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone -- R
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene 60
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane 2 J
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride 3 JB
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 -D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GWGH43B-03
EEY53
MEBF53
10-17-89

156 JB

15
378

121000



2890
-- R
36500
63.1

1580 J


115000

2.9 J
47.5 JB












3 J




3 JB

2 JB


33

GH-GUGH44A-03
EEY54
MEBF54
10-18-89



48.9 J
350
4.7 J
85400


12.3 JB
8380 J

38900
79.5

40500


89900
-- R

33 B










30






3 JB







-------
07-Mar-90
                                       TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                    Page 14 of 22
                   SAMPLE:    GH-GWGH40B-03 GH-FRGUGH40B-03
               OTR NUMBER:            EEYS1           EEY27
               ITR NUMBER:           MEBF51          MEBF27
             DATE SAMPLED:         10-18-89        10-18-89
                                     G&H LANDFILL
                        RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL  RESULTS                             v
                                 MONITORING WELLS

                        GH-GWGH41B-03   GH-GWGH42B-03   GH-GWGH43A-03 GH-GWGH43A-03 DL  GH-GWGH43B-03   GH-GUGH44A-03
                                EEY34           EEY35           EEY52         EEY52DL           EEY53           EEY54
                               MEBF34          MEBF3S          MEBF52             NA          MEBF53          MEBF54
                             10-18-89        10-19-89        10-17-89        10-17-89        10-17-89        10-18-89
     (ug/l)

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichtorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenot
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chtoroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indenod ,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol

Aroclor-1260
4,4'-ODD
5 J
6 J
                                                                3  J
                                                              330  JB
                                              250 DB
12 B
                                                                              10
                2 J
3 J
                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                      Page 15  of  22
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL
                                                               RI  PHASE III  ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                          MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnes i urn
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1.1. 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 oromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 - D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUGH45A-03
EEY55
MEBFS5
10-16-89

142 JB

8.7 J
162 J

85100



3600
-- R
43500
411

31600


74200

3 J
22.1 JB









25 B
2 J








3 JB




GH-GUI03-03
EEY65
MEBF65
10-17-89

206 B

9.3 J
54.9 J

23600



47.9 JB
8.7 JB
23600
7.3 J

30700


102000


142 J










10

10




3 JB






GH-GUI05-03
EEY43
MEBF43
10-18-89



86.1 J
788

132000
5.1 J
7.1 J

20000 J

79700
139
42.6 B
109000


185000
-- R
8.8 J
145










26


27









11
GH-GURD08XX-03
EEY66
MEBF66
10-19-89



83.9
510

90500



5120

40000
42.2

11300
1.9 J

56900


436






-- R



2 J






3 JB






GH-GURD18-03
EEY44
MEBF44
10-19-89



160
54.5 J

91200



6820

33600
41.8

4490 J
3.5 J

73300


65.3










1 J






5 JB






GH-GURD24-03
EEY56
HEBF56
10-19-89



15.9 J
173 J

60300


11.7 JB
794

19200
28

1560 J
2.7 J

25600


3.7 JB
















8






3 J
GH-GURL04-03
EEY45
HEBF45
10-19-89




1440

211000
9.8 JB
7.7 J

42200

45900
607

47900


60700

13.9 J
95.1 J










180






2 JB





12
GH-FRGURL04-03
EEY48
MEBF48
10-19-89

61 JB


1460

212000
8.9 JB
7.7 J

42800

46600
612

48500


61300

13.5 J
66 J










160






8 B





12

-------
07-Mar-90                                                                    TABLE  19                                                               Page 16 of 22


                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              RI PHASE III  ROUND 3  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS

                   SAMPLE:    GH-GWGH45A-03     GH-GUI03-03     GH-GUI05-03  GH-GURD08XX-03    GH-GURD18-03    GH-GURD24-03    GH-GURL04-03  GH-FRGURL04-03
               OTR NUMBER:            EEY55           EEY65           EEY43           EEY66          EEY44           EEYS6           EEY45           EEY48
               ITR NUMBER:           MEBF55          MEBF6S          MEBF43          MEBF66         MEBF44          MEBF56          MEBF4S          MEBF48
             DATE SAMPLED:         10-16-89        10-17-89        10-18-89        10-19-89        10-19-89        10-19-89        10-19-89        10-19-89
     _____


1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-d i chIorobenzene
1,4-d i chIorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy(naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nttroanaline                                                                                                                                       2  J
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fIuoranthene
BenzoCghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fIuoranthene
Benzoic acid                                                                                                                         9 J            10  J
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate                          150 B                                            4 JB                            3 JB
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene                                                          13                                                             10              10  J
Phenanthrene                                                                                                                         2 J             3  J
Phenol                                               11                               2  J             2 J                             3 J             9  J

Aroclor-1260
4,4'-DDD                                                                                                                            .1 J


                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                    Page  17 of 22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
S i I ver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulf ide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D ibromochloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Hethylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
t rans - 1 , 3 - D i ch I oropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GWRL06-03 GH-GWRL06-03 RE
EEY46 EEY46RE
MEBF46 NA
10-19-89 10-19-89

65 JB

28.1
2470

152000
5 JB
25.4 J

53600

117000
480
46
51500


91900

15.6 J
147





3 J




90








19 B



1200 J

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA






-- R



77 0








14 DJB



940 D
GH-GURL29-03 GH-FRGURL29-03
EEY57 EEY76
MEBF57 MEBF76
10-19-89 10-19-89

197 JB

28.8 J
774

154000

15.1 J

47500

74600
94.5 J
90.4
44700
2.1 J

166000

13.2 J
162




15 J





13 J





28 J
100 B

520 J



93 J

184 JB

17.5 J
711

149000

16.2 J

54600
4.4 JB
72300
108 J
96.8
45700 ,


163000

15.4 J
160



4 J
5 J
2 J
38 J


15 B
10 J





21 J
56 B
2 J
180 J

1 J

68 J
GH-GURU10-03
EEY58
MEBF58
10-19-89

92.9 JB


2070

239000
13.2 B
10.9 J

56800

26700
1110
42.2
48100


79300

18 J
118



16 J

170
14 J



88





250
9 JB

520



630
GH-GURU14-03
EEY67
MEBF67
10-19-89



80.1
263

159000
4.9 JB

16.8 JB
26200

45100
111

39600


102000

9.4 J
336






-- R



1300





1600

.




6400
GH-GURU21-03 GH-GURU22-03
EEY36 EEY37
MEBF36 MEBF37
10-19-89 10-19-89



35.5 J 111
89.8 J 455

87700 123000



7440 J 16500

27700 35400
114 149

21000 30000


74800 68700
-- R
6.8 J
49.5 41 B










97

7 J

15 10 J

67


5 B 250



350

-------
07-Har-90
TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                    Page  18 of 22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1 , 3 - d i ch I orobenzene
1 , A - d i ch I orobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy (naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenot
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)f luoranthene
BenzoCghi )perylene
BenzoC k ) f I uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyt) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a>h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4, 4' -ODD









GH-GURL06-03 GH-GWRL06-03 RE GH-GURL29-03 GH-FRGURL29-03
EEY46 EEY46RE EEYS7 EEY76
HEBF46 NA MEBFS7 MEBF76
10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
41 NA 2 J 2 J
NA
2 J NA 5 J 3 J
NA
NA
2 J NA 32 27
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 17 J 110 J
NA
5 JB NA
NA
NA 3 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
33 NA 2 J 4 J
NA
4 J NA 2 J 3 J
NA
NA
NOTES: FR = Field replicate
FB = Field blank
B = Blank contamination
J - Estimated value
R = Laboratory data not usable
NA = Not analyzed
DL = Diluted sample
RE = Sample reanalyzed
D = Diluted Result
GH-GURU10-03
EEY58
MEBF58
10-19-89

9 J

2 J
9 J
14
9 J
10


89





310 J

14 B

3 J




27

13
4.4










GH-GURU14-03
EEY67
MEBF67
10-19-89


7 J


120
12 J









330

13 JB

7 J

4 J

6 J
120

20











GH-GURU21-03 GH-GWRU22-03
EEY36 EEY37
MEBF36 MEBF37
10-19-89 10-19-89





6 J




8 J






2 J
3 JB 5 JB






14

3 J











                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                     Page 19 of  22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              Rl PHASE II! ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichtoroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch I oromethane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-CURW23-03 GH-GURW24-03 GH-GURU30-03 GH-GUTB01-03
EEY38 EEY59 EEY60 EFQ76
MEBF38 MEBF59 MEBF60 NA
10-19-89 10-19-89 10-19-89 10-17-89



29.9 14.6
86 J 2220 30.8 J

113000 172000 97600
12.7 B

10.2 JB
9740 41100 30.3 JB

29800 54800 23500
336 297 24.4
36.1 J
5240 50700 1630 J
2 J

56600 82500 100000

11.8 J
40.8 B 31 B 60.5






-- R



1 J 190

2 J



760
6 B

2 JB

2 J

3200

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

















5 J

4 J




GH-GUTB02-03
EF077
NA
10-17-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

















5 J

6




GH-GUTB03-03
EFQ78
NA
10-18-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

















77

7




GH-GUTB04-03
EFQ79
10-18-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

1 J






















GH-GUTB06-03
EEY99
NA
10-19-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

1 J























-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                             TABLE 19
                                                                                                                                                     Page  20  of 22
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL
                                                              Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 , 2 - d i ch I orobenzene
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy (naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzol b)f I uoranthene
BenzoCghi )perylene
Benzo( k ) f luoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Oiethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N - n i t rosod i pheny I ami ne
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Aroclor-1260
4, 4' -ODD
GH-GURU23-03 GH-GURU24-03
EEY38 EEY59
MEBF38 MEBF59
10-19-89 10-19-89






41











21 B


2 J


3 J
270

5 J
2.1

GH-GURU30-03 GH-GUTB01-03
EEY60 EFQ76
HEBF60 NA
10-19-89 10-17-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUTB02-03
EF077
NA
10-17-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GWTB03-03
EFQ78
NA
10-18-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUTB04-03
EFQ79
10-18-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GH-GUTB06-03
EEY99
NA
10-19-89

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                              TABLE  19
                                                                                                                                                     Page 21 of 22
                                                                            G&H  LANDFILL
                                                               RI  PHASE  III  ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                          MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
(ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Oichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
D i bromoch 1 orornet hane
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene (total)
GH-GUFB01-03 GH-GUFB02-03 GH-GUFB03-03 GH-GWFB04-03
EEY49 EEY50 EEY68 EEY70
MEBF49 MEBF50 MEBF68 MEBF70
10-18-89 10-19-89 10-16-89 10-17-89

95.6 JB 77.7 JB

1.2 JB 1.1 JB
2 J 3.5 J

315 J 67.2 JB 661 J 733 J


13.7 JB
25.3 JB 55.2 JB 44.9 JB 17.6 JB
-- R -- R
164 J 268 J
1.1 J




146 J 1230 JB 1030 JB
-- R

9.3 JB 7.4 J

1 J







26 B







2 J

5 J 5




GH-GUFB05-03 GH-GUFB06-03
EEY72 EEY75
MEBF72 MEBF75
10-18-89 10-19-89

93.6 JB

1.2 JB
1.6 J

811 J 431 JB




4.7 JB
164 J 130 J





1080 JB 639 J


9.8 J

2 J















72 1 J

6





-------
07-Mar-90                                                                    TABLE  19                                                                Page  22 of 22


                                                                           G&H  LANDFILL
                                                              RI  PHASE III  ROUND  3  ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE:
OTR NUMBER:
ITR NUMBER:
DATE SAMPLED:
GH-GUFB01-03
EEY49
MEBF49
10-18-89
GH-GUFB02-03
EEY50
MEBF50
10-19-89
GH-GUFB03-03
EEY68
MEBF68
10-16-89
GH-GUFB04-03
EEY70
MEBF70
10-17-89
GH-GUFB05-03
EEY72
MEBF72
10-18-89
GH-GUFB06-03
EEY75
MEBF75
10-19-89
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-d i chIorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
2,4-dimethylphenol
2-methy[naphthalene
2-methylphenol
3-Nitroanaline
4-chloroaniline
4-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate                                                                          90
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol

Aroclor-1260
4,4'-ODD


                            NOTES:  FR = Field replicate
                                    FB = Field blank
                                     B = Blank contamination
                                     J = Estimated value
                                     R = Laboratory data not usable
                                    NA = Not analyzed
                                    DL = Diluted sample
                                    RE = Sample reanalyzed
                                     D = Diluted Result
                                    TB = Trip blank

-------
07-Mar-90
   TABLE 20
                                                                                                                                                 Page 1 of 3
                                                     MONITORING WELLS -
                                                           Rl PHASE III
 G&H LANDFILL
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-GUGH02A-03
SAS NUMBER: E36
DATE SAMPLED: 10-18-89
TDS
Alkalinity
BOO
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
Chloride
Sulfate
Oi I and Grease
678
A87
it B
56
22
0.08
20

113


GH-GUGH12A-03
E41
10-18-89
696
481
3 B
40
11
0.17
7.5

94
50

GH-GUGH24A-03
E45
10-19-89
773
595
19
146
45
0.34
25

98
4

GH-GUGH26A-03
E43
10-19-89
705
542
4 B
54
20
0.19
20

74
14

GH-GUGH32A-03
E03
10-17-89
800
640
NA
35
11
0.13
45

140
24

GH-FRGUGH32A-03
E04
10-17-89
788
638
NA
36
11
0.12
48

135
25

GH-GUGH33B-03
EOS
10-17-89
888
668
NA
56
15
0.16
19

132
3

GH-GUGH35A-03
E02
10-17-89
748
592
NA
80
21
0.34
31

114
3

         NOTES:   B = Blank Contamination
                  J = Estimated Value
                 NA = Not Analyzed

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                           TABLE 20
Page 2 of 3
                                                                         G&H LANDFILL
                                                     MONITORING UELLS - CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
                                                           RI PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-GWGH35B-03
SAS NUMBER: £01
DATE SAMPLED: 10-17-89
TDS
Alkalinity
BOD
COO
TOC
Total Phosphate
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
Chloride
Sulfate
Oil and Grease
616
439
NA
40
10
0.12
1.3

76
32

GH-GUGH39A-03 GH-GUGH40A-03
E39 E40
10-18-89 10-18-89
542
359
5 B
45
13
0.07
4

92


836
750
3 B
52
13
0.1
21

131
70

GH-GUGH41B-03
E42
10-18-89
734
554
7 B
111
23
0.35
15

110
2

GH-GUGH42B-03
£44
10-19-89
436
293
4 B
28

0.11
0.45

44
25

GH-GUI05-03
E38
10-18-89
1378
1198
3 B
103
29
0.11
85

245


GH-GURD18-03
E48
10-19-89
640
293
2 B
23
5
0.07
1.7

135
62

GH-GURL04-03 GH-FRGURL04-03
£49 £53
10-19-89 10-19-89
1127
1014
18 J
204 J
43 J
0.5
40

67
17 J
a
1113
1032
7 BJ
246 J
33 J
0.45
39

64
23 J
8
         NOTES:   B = Blank Contamination
                  J = Estimated Value
                 NA = Not Analyzed

-------
07-Mar-90
                                                                           TABLE 20
                                                                                                                                                 Page 3 of 3
                                                                         G&H LANDFILL
                                                     MONITORING WELLS - CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS
                                                            Rl PHASE III ROUND 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE: GH-GURL06-03
SAS NUMBER: E46
DATE SAMPLED: 10-19-89
TDS
Alkalinity
BOD
COD
TOC
Total Phosphate
Ammonia
Nitrate + Nitrite
Chloride
Sulfate
Oil and Grease
1283
1184
20
211
63
0.63
31

79
6

GH-GURU21-03
E50
10-19-89
625
471
5 B
123
21
0.68
15

99
22

GH-GURU22-03
E51
10-19-89
768
594
10
100
32
0.35
27

97
9

GH-GWRU23-03 GH-GUFB01-03 GH-GUFB02-03
E52 E37 E47
10-19-89 10-18-89 10-19-89
606
383
3 B 2
35
8
0.15
2.5

82
53

         NOTES:   B = Blank Contamination
                  J = Estimated Value
                 NA = Not Analyzed

-------
                            Agency Review Draft

                   REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
                               Volume 2 of 2

                           G&H LANDFILL SITE
                          Shelby Township, Michigan
                    WA 12-5170.0/Contract No. 68-W8-0040

                               March 16, 1990
This document has been prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
under Contract No. 68-W8-0040.  The material contained herein is considered
confidential and is not to be disclosed to, discussed with, or made available to
any person or persons for any reason without the prior express approval of a
responsible official of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
GLT959/019.50-2

-------
CA-2-79
                                    chen  and  associates,  inc.
                   HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                               SIEVE ANALYSIS
                      TIME READINGS
                                                 U.S. STANDARD SERIES
                                                                           CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24
45
70
in
c/l
tt. VI
PERCENT
bo (3 3 86
HR 7
MIN 15
J1 01
HR
MIN 60 H
02 01
IN 19
35 0<
MIN 4 M
» J
N 1 V
9
UN '2
17 0
DO -10
74 X
0 -5
19 2
0 -40-3
97 1 i
42
B 'I
90 1
s
19
0
'
6
! 'A
38 «
^zi
76 9.

52 l<

) 1 38
.-
1 . 7
5" (
52 12
7
1!
r
X
a
S fi 8 a o °~
RETAINED
Z
UJ
70
ao
30
                                        DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
                       CLAY TO SILT
                                                       SANO
                                               PINE
                                                         MEDIUM
                                                                 [COARSE
                                                                              GRAVEL
                                                                          PINE
                                                                                  COARSE
                                                                                         4COBBLES
                     GRAVEL    8

                        LIQUID LIMIT

                     SAMPLE OF


                Natural Moisture
                          SANO  H?  H        SILT AND CLAY  *»5    %

                            %       PLASTICITY INDEX           *

                                             FROM Sample No.  GH-SS02A308  E-01
                   HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                                SIEVE ANALYSIS
24
45
100
90
ao
70
U3
£»
UJ
£40
£
X
20
10
0
.0
r
MR 7 t
MIN 151
M^M^W
^•^•^M
•^K^H^
Tl
•IB
JIN 60»i
^=i
01 002 (X
ME RE
•IN 19

15 (X
kOlNGS
MIN 4 MIN i t
r=
^
•IN '2

» 319 037 0
» '1C
	

us.
» -5

n 149 2>
STAND/
0 '40 '3
=i=
-rf-
-7
zb
97
ba
5
kROSEP
0 -1

» i
IES 1 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
•10 1
8 1
•=-+
	 <»
	 f-
19 *2.


38 4


re 9



	


— h
=d
h
>2 19.1 38.1 76.2 127
r

2C
10
o
intu
<
^
Ui
SOU
Z
UI
«g
UJ
&
70
»
90
too
0
                                                      <2         20

                                        DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
                        CLAY TO SILT
                                                       SAND
                                               -IN6    I   MEDIUM   [COARSEl   -INE   1  COARSE
                                                                              GRAVEL
                                                                                         •(COBBLES
                      GRAVEL   26


                         LIQUID LIMIT


                      SAMPLE OF
                          SAND   6 1  %        SILT AND CLAY   1 3    %

                             %      PLASTICITY INDEX           *


                                             FROM  Sample  No.  GH-SS07M308  E-02
        89
'•l3tura]  Moisture  = 8.8/
                       GRADATION TEST RESULTS
Fig..

-------
CA-2-79
                                   chen  and associates,  inc.

24
44
100
90
80
70
§60
crt
?,„
PERCENT
Oo o 8 8 4 •
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
MR 7
MIN IS
01 O
Tl
-IR
MIN MM
32 .31
MERE/
UN 19
35 OC
kOINGS
MIN 4M
	
» 0
N 1 Ik
9 u.
UN "i
17 0
SIEVE ANALYSIS
» -10
	
74 ^
US
0 '3
— »
19 2
STAND
5 -40'3
="
)7 5
42
»RO SEr
9
=|
90 1
2 ic





	 1"


.1 76.2 127
1
GRAVEL
FINE
COARSE


X
(2
30
O
4i°r
VK
SOE
U*
600
70
80
90
100
10
COBBLES
         89
          GRAVEL   1 2    %

             LIQUID LIMIT           *

          SAMPLE OF

        Natural Moisture  =  11.2x

                           GRADATION TEST RESULTS
SAND  69 %        SILT AND CLAY   19   %

  *      PLASTICITY INDEX           %

                 FROM  Sample  No.  GH-SS12A308  E-0<+



                                          Fig	L

-------
CA-2-79
                                chen and associates, inc.

24
45
100
90
ao
70
PERCENT PASStf
3 8 8 ft 8 i
0
a
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS
MR 7
MIN IS
I^^MBB
••^•^MB
?=
91 U
Til
HR
MIN 80 V
^•••HWMH
	 1
1 1**
02 01
«E RE/
IN 19
==
DS 01
DINGS
MIN 4M

N ' fc
—
••^-
>9 J19 j.
1
UN '?

17 C
M ^0

4 1
MIN IS I
01 OC
Tl
4R.
JIN SOlr
12 OC
ME R&
UN 19
» (X
40INGS
MIN 4 M
)9 01
CLAY TO SILT
IN 1 tl
9 a
IN '2
	 1
17 0
OIA

0 '1C
U 14
METER
US STAND)
10 -SO -40*3
1 	 i — *—
9 297 ' 5
42
OF PARTICL
IRO SEP
0 -i
90 1
: IN Ml
IES
•10
• r
=±
19 12
2.0
LLIMET
9
38 4
ERS
SANO
;INE | MEDIUM ICOARSE
>.
—
CTTTT
'6 9
CLEARS
i- *
	
2 19
QUARE
•" 1
.1 3<
OPENIh
>- 3
i 76
GRAVEL
CINE | COARSE
IGS
r •
	
2 12
"
:
7'
1!
r
2
-------
CA-2-79
                                  chen and  associates,  inc.
                  HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                      TIME READINGS
           24'HP. 7 HP.
           4S MIN IS MIN.  60 MIN  19 MIN « MIN
                                                            SIEVE ANALYSIS
            U S STANDARD SERIES


1 MIN '200  '100  '50 '40 '30   "6   f-a
                                                   CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS


                                                           vj-   r  5-8  8-
1
1 40
10
°a

91 01

02 01

tt Of

19 0

19 o.

7 0
OIA
CLAV TO SILT

74 1
METER

19 2
OF PA

97 S
42
RTICL
kMMM—
p=9
90 t
EIN Ml
K^
19
LLIM
c!
e
R
0
El
=Z=
38 4
•ERS
SANO
FINE | MEDIUM
[COARSE
^
76 $.
m
52 i(
^
» 1 3J

	
.i . r
GRAVEL
-INE | COARSE
m
—
J2 12
__

:
1


iHB
^•1
•••
V.
a
8 & 8 a o °
RETAINED
!N33H3d _
8 S i R 5B
ES
                     GRAVEL    6


                        LIQUID LIMIT


                     SAMPLE OF
      SANO 36  S        SILT AND CLAY   58    v,

        4k                             ^fc
  2 A            PLASTICITY INDEX    10


                        FROM  Sample  No.  GH-SS15A308 E-07
                    Natural  Moisture =  12.83;
24
45
100
90
O
*n,
PERCENT
_o S 3 8 S
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
MR 7 »
MIN IS 1
at oc
Tl
•4A
JIN SO Hi
! i 1 1
12 OC
ME RE
UN 19
tt 01
tOlNGS
MIN 4 M
1'
» 0
IN 1 fc
1 	
9 0
UN -2
37 0
OIA
CLAY TO SILT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
» '10
r* 14
METER
US
0 -5
• :
OF PA
STA
o -4
97
RTI
NO/
0'3
m
=
s
42
CLE
kRO SEP
0 M
	
==
JO 1
: IN Ml
IES
•10
> r
=J
19
2
LLIMI
t
0
rr
s
^
38 4
ERS
SAND
FINE
MEDIUM (COARSE
V
=
76 9
;LEA«S
,- >.
—
>2 IS
OUAPE
1 1 3C
OPEN^
,- 3
1 76
GRAVEL
--INE I COARSE
GS
r • 5"
1
=-=£
.2 127
1
r
=
hi
52
COBBLES

86835°
RETAINED
60S
cc
UJ
a.
70
90
90
100
10
 i  An 89
GRAVEL    6   %      SAND

   LIQUID LIMIT     22    *

SAMPLE OF


Natural  Moisturp  = 21.3

                 GRADATION TEST RESULTS
                                                  %        SILT AND CLAY   50   %


                                                  PLASTICITY INDEX     8    %


                                                          FROM  Samole  No.  GH-SS16/A308  E-08
                                                Fig..

-------
CA-2-79
                              chen and associates, inc.

24
45
90
80
70
i ao
V)
PERCENT PA
S 8 8 £ 8
01
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
MR. 7 I
MIN 15 »

TIH
*R
•UN. 60 M

K. RE/
IN 19
"^y^
DINGS
MIN 4M

N 1 Ik

UN '2

SIEVE ANALYSIS
1
M '10

U.S.
0 -5

STA
o •«

MO
J-»
:z2
"—

«RO SEF
) -i

IIES
5 M,
—
»•«

i
~m

'-
t=~~

CLEAR i
r '
•5=

iOUARE
." V

OPEN^
-." 3

2 1S
lOUARE
I- 1

.1 36
OPENIh
*- :

.1 76
as
r • 5-

2 127
1!
r

X
a

88388
PERCENT RETA
100
10
CLAY TO SILT
SANO
PINE
1 MEDIUM
ICOARSE
GRAVEL
CINE
| COARSE
COBBLES
GRAVEL   17
   LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLEOF
Natura
                                     SAND 6^*
                                       *
      89
                   *      SILT AND CLAY   19   %
                   PLASTICITY INDEX      NP  H
                          FROM Sample No. GH-SS23A308  E-10
Moisture = 12. 9V
        GRADATION TEST RESULTS              Fig __
                                                                   5

-------
CA-2-T9
                                   chen and  associates, inc.

24
45
100
90
80
70
i 80
*/>
PERCENT PA
o X ^ 6 8
0
.01
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
HR 7
MIN IS
P^HBMI^B
JP*-S
Tl
HH
MIN 60 M
aii-1
UIEREX
UN 19
E— •
iDINGS
MIN 4 M
53
N i ^
F=^
•IN . '2
B— "
SIEVE ANALYSIS
M ''0
-r*
US.
o •&

STAND
0 '40 '3
=4=
»RO SEf
0 -1

llES
5 'T-'

It 002 005 009 019 -37 074 149 297 1 590 1 19 2
42 20
i

:

38 476 9


SQUARE
." V
	
OPENI*

IGS
!



52 19.1 38 1 . 76.2 127
S'

2C
>z

r
10
20
0
UJ
40Z
88388
PERCENT RE
io'
                                      DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT
SANO
PINE
| MEDIUM
ICOARSE
GRAVEL
FINE
| COARSE
COBBLES
                     GRAVEL   21   %



                       LIQUID LIMIT



                     SAMPLE OF




                    Natural  Moisture
   SANO 62  %        SILT AND CLAY   17



             PLASTICITY INOOC    NP     %



                     FROM  Sample  No.  GH-SS2V*4308  E-11
                  HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                             SIEVE ANALYSIS
                      TIME READINGS
                                               U S. STANDARD SERIES
                                                                        CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24
46
J
K
30
10
0
0
MR 7 f
MIN IS 1
01 OC
•5 01
MIN 4 M
39 0
IN 1 *
9 a
UN •?
37 0
DIA
CLAY TO SILT
» "1C
U 14
METER
10 -S
9 2
OF PA
0 '4
0'3
=3
—
=4=
J7 1 S
42
RTICLI
O -1
30 1
• IN Ml
•10
» |-
=rj-
19 12.
20
LLIMET
I ••
38 4
ERS
SAND
PINE
MEDIUM (COARSE
*
76 9.
>• "
12 i;
.- i
n M
»- 3
1 rs
GRAVEL
CINE
COARSE
- • r
1 - -1-
2 127
1
r
21!
52
COBBLES
! fc 8 8 5 °
ETAINEO
Z
UJ
600
UJ
a.
70
n
90
100
10
                     GRAVEL        %



                        LIQUID LIMIT




                     SAMPLE OF
   SAND     %        SILT AND CLAY




      *      PLASTICITY INDEX




                    FROM
 l  M3  89
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
Fig..

-------
HYDROMETER
                              GRADATION
                               L    WORKSHEET
                                     H
                             ATERIALJJ*
• •>••<.*.
JOB NO.
                             PART NO.
      JOB NAME
                          PREP. BY_LAfa£-DATB

                           CALC.
                     DEPTH

       VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
                               SAMPLE
                             .-^ Vf
                                                       "arP^t— i^U
      BUN BY
                                SAMPLE PREPERATION
                                                               SIEVING TIME
-> -^
2.1 -C5
71 ^
Iv.o
2i.c?
£J£*C^GRA1
-L--»vO.«^7
MTY
i. AMOUNT 	 /_
DISPERSIN
•2*'

HYC.
READ




•**-

zq.o
•?<= ^
,- •>
r\ .^
^3.0
10. o
HYD.*
CORR




-^ 	
4.-:



•- .7.
4 -fi
8i2B











FACTOR X CORRECTED READING =
X OF TOTAL PASSINQ


% OF TOTAL
PASSBVG




y
^
«
.^
^
- ^

c -|
2Z7

(o
/
O *
GRAVEL ? ' * 5AMn 47 * ^L'v.c, rr 4S~ *
G AGENT" 6*/0fVfi ^*O 5
ll DATE
PARTICLE
DIAMETER




0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
r ALIR










•_-
^TfiBArjp | nrrAjlON mmimmi _____
       * coMccnoN mouDCS TEMP, •CHOCUS. AMD OCFIOCULENT

       ~        :DATE IN:	SUPERVISOR:

       L-- cs-esj ""  LOCATION:___	

-------
..., HYDROMETER      GRADA™N ANALYS.P^T.u^ ™Ku^l
r'   	••_          WORKSHEET	»VIM!   LAB MO - -**•***
                                             -CAUTION: HAZARDOL
                                             ^n
JOB NO. I-*!**
JOB NAME -P-SA -
                        PART
                                   IT
PREP. BY.

 CALC.
                                                         DATB
                                                         CKEO. BY
    HOLE
                                      NO._Q2*.
    VISUAL
   RUM BY
                          SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
OP PAN AfO SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED —
IIILI .mi I'M i inn ^
% OF TOTAL PASSING




?
— *>

3"





1 1/2"





3/4"




(00
3/8"



uz.?
^
NO.4



7P.2.
74;
WXs
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
WET DRY /
' • /
SAMPLE 	 X^«^. "
RETAINED —>« 7
ON NO. 4_L__ ^O^Z.
PASSING • A>, ''fls
NO. A . ,_,„ \2/0& *L

   RUN BY
                      SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                     SIEVING TIME
SIEVE
NO.
8 (103
16
30 (40]
50
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
l-.V\
\1.^>\
•20.<^l
arAfe
4O-\2,
4 \.-ll.
.A^ m "~

WEIGHT
PASSING








X OF
TOTAL
PASSING
6^ ^
5G '
4^ /
Z^ 7
1C"'
' ^ y
i -z /
/ _'
	
	
FACTOR r JK£ =
W


tMIS^ •

. - MOISTURE DETERMINATION
•
DISH NO.
WT.WETSOLANDDBH
WT. DRY SOIL AND DBH
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
•4
MATERIAL






-4
MATERIAL
C.-!1^-
341 .S
&?{*(,
^J ^*^( i C*P
«rs7..-2.'
: W
?.?S"
MYGRO.
'MOISTURS

^i.Tf
4^3,0?
— ^»

O.V2-*
HYDRO.
SAMPLE

£•*. ^-


50,3 I '

RUN BY n T unwivic i cn MI^MUTOIO
CYLINDgP NO. // CBC/-IC
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
^.2.1
I.ZZ-
_•— ^—
^A^J"
/O ^ £*
^7 ft «>* *^
9. W2^

^.5?
1\.Q%
r» C,rQi^<»- PATP /2
1C GRAV
-27- *
MTY
'9 ' <
J5 AMOUNT 	 t_!
D1SPERSIN
2sr

TEST TIME
START MIX
STOP MIX
— -0.5 min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMr.





2.0 . O
•zc.c
2.0,0
J-0- £
•LI. d
2.7. n
HYD.
READ





w.o
1*1.0
10. S"
10.^
9s .O
1-0
CORR*





5o



4.'
••
CCRR
READ











DNISSVd 1
r ONIOV3U 0310
Si <
s *-
e o
0 °
0 u.
x O
§ ^
N"
O
<
u.
X Or TOTAL
PASSNG





)3 '
10 ^
-7 ' f
-7 J
5" y
3 '
GRAVEL .Z-Co * CAMn 'o / * H^-SLT 'S *
G AGE
ll DA
PARTIC
DIAMET


MT • y*S* AfAP0**
TE
=|




0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.0 19 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
CALIH






«.


••-

STORAGE 1 OCATION _., ' "
     COMtCCTION IMCUBCS TtM^ MCHSOJS. AMD OCTLOCULCMT

             DATE IN:	_ SUPERVISOR:
 .T-
—:*" L-4 (5-653
             LOCATION:.

-------

     HYDROMETER
                                         CAUTION: HA/AKUL
                   GRAOAI].°" A"ALYSIS    MATERIAL IN USE
                             WORKSHEET
     JOB NAME
                                                  LAB NO
                                       PREP. BY I^WA HATS IT-/a -Eft

                                        CALC. BY ^^ CKED. BV QP
            DEPTH
                              SAMPLE NO
VISUAL
                 CJi
                                   ,.
                                           i •Vr
                                                         - \/ .
B,1NBv SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
CFPANANDSAMRE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED
DRY.WT. PASSING
X OF TOTAL PASSING







3"





1 1/2"




<**
3/4"



^
^
3/8"


^
^~

N0.4




/ 00
WXs
SIEVINR TIUP
SAMPLE WEIGHTS -••
WET DRY
TOTAL
fi A LI Pi P
RETAINED
ON NO. A • 	
PASSING
NO. 4 _____ '
r«-c •»-•••.
                      SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                   SIEVING TIME
SIEVE
NO.
8 (103
16
30 (403
50
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
fe.-2_<^
O.feV
\ .ou
7. .CM
A AH
-|-v\
CL_A3r-^

WEIGHT
PASSING








T%OT°AFL
PASSING/
^)£$
-3 £?
9^ '
% ' '/
9c? '
^S'
—
—
FACTOR =^ =


IW$oJ

. - MOISTURE DETERMINATION
•
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DBH
WT. DRY SOIL AND DBH
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
•4
MATERIAL






-4
MATERIAL
(L-2.-
*M« 0.
»^?'^ '
J / J f ***
^^ QJ
• 	 ^w

HYGRO.
'MOISTURE
— ^>
^4/4. 2^/
a££3.7}
^>
/
o,i*o4
HYDRO.
SAMPLE

5*0- 3i"

Go.og'
•

pUN ay nTUMUMcien MWMI.TOIO - — r*c*.o iv/f»T^_rn<_ fy *
CYLINinep MO 10 eoe/>ie
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
&
IQ, w
l<,S4f
It. OH
n f^\\-V PATP 12,
1C GRAV
-2?- 2
flTV
5 AMOUNT
D1SPEJJSIN
^ ^ n

TEST TIME
START MIX
STOP MIX
__ ?.f- min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.





20.0
ZO.C
20.0
2 c0
-------
-'HYDROMETER       GRADATJON ANALYsfiAUTIQN:
~'   	            -WORKSHEET          MATFRlA&Bl
   JOB NO. 1
                       PART
   JOB  NAME '
                          PREP.

                           CALC
HOLE ^* -
                 DEPTH
         SAMPLE
          j>^_^-».
   VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
                            SAMPLE PREPERATION
       sieve SIZE
                             1  1/2
               3/4'
          3/8*
NO.4
                                                          SIEVING r
SAMPLE HEIGHTS'
     OF PAN AM) SAMPLE
   WT. OF PAN
   DRY WT. RETAINED «•*
                                                         TOTAL
                                                         SAMPLE
   X OF TOTAL PASSING
                                    /OO
                                                         RETAINED  ---*!tl'J
                                                         ON NO. r  —  •*'-
                                                         PASSING
                        SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
          WEIGHT
         RETAINED
              WEIGHT
              PASSING
 X OF
 TOTAL
PASSING
FACTOR =
                                            W
    6 (10}
                                            MOISTURE DETERMINATION
     16
                       10 /
                                                MATERIAL
                                 -4
                               MATERIAL
                           MYGRO.
                           MOISTURE
                    HYDRO.
                    SAMPLE
   30(40)
                             DISH NO.
                               O -24
     50
                                Wr.WETSOLANDDBH
    100
                             WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
                                      4.30.
    200
                                WT. DISH
                                                           \
    PAN
                             WT. OF DRY SOIL
                                                           r w
   TOTAL
                             % MOISTURE
                               II.Z5'
BUM pv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS '-^^
CYI INOPP Mrt % tPFClF
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
9- '3
3- llf
<•• —
3. /£"
?• /%
°t.^
to. ist
4.30
\l*00

1C GRAV
MTY
2. AMOUNT
BISPERSIN
n

TEST TIME
START MIX
STOP MIX

1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.





^D./0
26.0
£0.&
ZOiO
2.2 .n
n.*»
HYD.
READ





ft.O
is-.o
iJt.S*
n.r
9s-.r>
i.n
HYD.*
CORR
—




»"• *5 '
1 1

"
4.*, "
s.o1
R?2S











it
O
FACTOR X CORRECTED REAI
X OF TOTAL PASSING
GRAVEL 	 ^_ 	 X RAMH !rf\ « rL^y-5LrT /9
*S^GL





/•g '
' /
^ '
'0
5" '
2 -^
-«
G A G E N T ' *^ ^° r
-------
-"HYDROMETER
                                                ->
                                   -CAUTlOiM:
          GRADATJON ANALYSIS     MATE^^N
 JOB-NO. _Li
                        PART NO.
 JOB  MAilff
                                  PREP. BY_fc*fc*.DATE J2^

                                   CALC.
 HOLE m-^i* DEPTH

 VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
                               SAMPLE NO—OS.
                                  £f
                                                 L^^ QlTso
                          SAMPLE PREPARATION
     SIEVS'SIZE :
                              ! 1/2
                       3/4
                                                  NO.4
                                     SAMPLE
   OFPAN>WC SAMPLE
                                                                WET
 WT. OF PAM
 DRY WT. RETAINED—— >
                                                        TOTAL
                                                        SAMPLE
                                                       t7t>M
 X OF TOTAL PASSING
                                     loo
                                                        RETAINED
                                                        ON NO. •*
                                                         PAWING
RUN BY.
                      SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                          S|EV|NQ TIME
 SIEVE
  NO.
       WEIGHT
      RETAINED
.WEIGHT

PASSING
 % OF
 TOTAL
PASSING
FACTOR =
 8 (10)
         7t-\
                                           MOISTURE DETERMINATION
  1
          2A
                                              MATERIAL
                                        MATERIAL
                             HYGRO.
                            MOISTURE
                                                HYDRO.
                                                SAMPLE
 30 (40)
                        5-4-'
                DISH NO.
                                O -
                               WT. WET SOL AND DGH
                              .WT. DRY SOC AM3 D6H
  200
                              WT. DISH
                                                                            i
                               WT. OF DRY SOIL
                               X MOISTURE
                                                                      50,4
pyfj Rv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINC
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
r
°s o
~J D
cHoVfo*




/
5^

•

s • ^'

S^S











tl
o
< 0
Ul Z
= W
0 W
«**T!r
H- O-
2 -
i *
§ 2
0 u.
x- O -
R *
0
Ik
•wss^




«*-- /
/8 '
'r '
/27
^ "
b',
3 '
GRAVEL <5I ' it ^^up ^0 «J"ri"Av.eLrr /9 *
« ^wWiNAPo*
il DATE
PARTICLE .
DIAMETER




O.OSO mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
rAi IB




.«.

*




STORAGE LOCATION 	
£K COMCCTION  IMCUACS TtliP, MCM


 ""•        DATE IN:

L-4 (5-8S5    LOCATION
                        AND OCPLOCULEMT


                              SUPERVISOR:

-------
HYDROMETER
GRADATJON
                          WORKSHEET
                             HAZARDOUS
                     MATERIAL!
  >JOB NO. 1 -*4\^

  JOB NAME :
PART NO.
                   PREP. BY_fe6fc^DATE

                   CALC.
              DEPTH
      SAMPLE NO. ftk
   VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
               £r
                                        • i-
                      SAMPLE PREPERAT10N
SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED
DRY WT. PASSING
X OF TOTAL PASSING








3"






1 1/2"






3/4~






3/«"
•- :• .


s
f
WXr
NO.4 „
-.*

^
'
loo



TOTAL •'":'-- '-'.-^P.'
ft A Ai Pi e w.;-. -rfxn ;•

nu MO! A m;.,J~~'-- ••'"•*•"'
.PASSING " • 7 T
NO. 4 _ ____. _ - -
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS «,rvik,,. T^F
SIEVE
NO.
8 (10)
16
30 (40}
SO
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
o cn
r>.ud
O 4T5
O.l=ft
"2. ^A-^
\v -\"V
t^v.Tl

WEIGHT
PASSING








T»0?/L
PASSING
IOO'
100' ,
99
99'.
44!
77'

	
FACTOR = S&-S
* Inf


i.^^^ •-•? '•-

. - UCISTURE DETERMINATION
.
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND OGH
WT.ORYSOLANDDCH
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
MATERIAL






MATERIAL

r - \>r

flftrf'^^^*^?'
*a..\ -
/f.s'r
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
_3r»
^7
^i-^3
4^3.26
— ^

.C/Z3'
HYDRO.
SAMPLE

^t>.3g

/
5^,24>

RUN BY n i unwiwc i cn «r*/*u i *»i«
CYLINO
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
$•£>£
q,0t,
• •"
9*^7
cyj^
9.£&
/o. o7
ly,i2.
j^.^i
ep NO. ^7 c;ppf^|p
0 ^V^ OATP /2-'
TEST TIME
START- MIX
STOP MIX
~ 0.5 min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
,25h 45 min
TE
•° u.
x. O -
0 *
o
<
Ik
DISPERSING AGEN
2.^ ml DAT
*P^SGL




•^ • /
51 '/
37 /
2^" /
/9 '
/^ /
/o '
«BAWC. (p ' * <.AMn 2.2, K :-VLAY-5LIT 77 *'
$ COMMCCTION INCUBCS TC
— • DATE
MK, MCMISOJS, AMD OCTUOCULCMT
IN: QIID
L-* rs-asi LOCATION-
ERVISC
PARTICU
DIAMETEI

T • U 0/6 rJ n r* 0 ^
P rAi IR





0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm





».





>B.





-------
                        GRADATION  ANALYSIS
                        •	WORKSHEET	
                                            CAUTION:  HAZARDOl
                                                MATERIAUJNJJSE
 JOB NO.-L^
 JOB NAME
                 PART

                   P

                                  PREP. BY K*k/v ftATg f2.-lQ-fejfrs

                                  CALC. BY^M CK ED. BY Op ~
 HOLEfett.
                        SAMPLE
 VISUAL DESCRIPTION:

                                                         rv^\xAr We*. .^3
RUN BY.
                          SAMPLE PREPERATION
                                                        SIEVING
                                                                   *.
                                                                   r-
     SIEVE SIZE
                        1 1/2"
                      3/4
                                           3/a
                                          NO. 4
                                    S AMPLE WEIGHTS
   OF PAN AND SAMPLE
                                                               WET
                                                               ORY
 WT. OF PAN
 DRY WT. RETAINED
                                                 \l4.Lfl
                                                TOTAL
                                                SAMPLE


                                                RETAINED
 X OF TOTAL PASSING
                              loo
                                            W%s
                     SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
  NO.
                                                        SIEVING TIME
 WEIGHT
RETAINED
.WEIGHT

PASSING
 X OF
 TOTAL
PASSING
                                 FACTOR ~
 8 (10)
                                   MOISTURE DETERMINATION
  16
                                             MATERIAL
                                               MATERIAL
                                               HYGRO.
                                              MOISTURE
                                               HYDRO.
                                               SAMPLE
 30 (40)
                        DISH NO.
   SO
                       WT. WET SOL AND OBH
  100
   4S
                              WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
  200
                  5%
                WT. DISH
                               52. ^
       •2.2.
                              WT. OF DRY SOIL
                                                   r w
                              X MOISTURE
RUM HV rlTUltwMC 1 CM ANAUTdlo
CYLINO
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
9> 0y
OftOi.
-•P— '
T> • /.
i_D AMOUNT 	 LA
DISPERSIN
2-A n

TEST TIME
START' MIX
STOP MIX
• 8.3 IBIii"
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.
c-





2,0.0
zo.o
£>& • 'O
2.0 « o
11.0
l\.s
HYD.
READ





34.0
2*9, a
^7.0
Zl>0
1^1 .0
IS-O
CORR*





$•?


' '
45 '
s/y
CORR
READ


-








it
0
rt
< a
£ 2
e co
a »
•"Tlr
K- 
-------
HYDROMETER
                   GRADATJON  ANALYSIS
                        WORKSHEET	
                CAUTION: HAZARDOl
                   MATERIAL IN USE
 JOB NO.
 JOB NAME
                                       PREP. BY kAHV nATC
                                        CALC. BY^I^ CKED.
HOLE
             DEPTH.
SAMPLE NO._C&-
 VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED* —
-•». ** *^ «*« jg— ^•^•^•^MT^^ .^^^
^pWW^^^^^H^^^^B^^^^^W^^^B^^^^^^
« OF TOTAL PASSING





— O

3"





1 1/2"





3/4"




/CO
3/8"



f,3f-
?^'
NO. 4



/s;o,
^'
W»r 	
SIEVING TIMP
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
WET DRY
• • •
TOTAL ' T. '. Jar f
SAUPLE *&iAJ»o
RETAINED tfA
ON NO. ^ * 15-0
PASSING " &&S'
hlQ. A ^^* v
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS stEX/1Mrt T1Me
SIEVE
NO.
8 CIO)
16
30 (40)
SO
100
200
PAN
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
I .OT_
2.CTV
^..^
u c^r^
Ita ."Ifs
2.*3.7.S
7±a.V^>

.WEIGHT
PASSING








T«of/L
PASSING
^^/
^o',
^7'
^/'
foZ,y>
50'
—
__ _
FACTOR r •£& =
Wf


f,%S73J . .

- - MOISTURE DETERMINATION
•
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DGH
WT. DRY SOU AND DfiH . -
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
»4
MATERIAL






-4
MATERIAL
rv _\

^3A
^*/Y^o
«^7~TT"^'
•*>! A-
r vu
2I-ZS'
-HYGRO.
MOISTURE
^j*.
"

ZZO 0>7
<2t<*.3£
- . .v

0,%

 ttJIM BY
                      HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINO
6lSH N
CLOCK
TIME
*.£7
2. rg

s.s?
9,oz
&s,o
Z\>-0
11.0
i=5 .n
l^.o
CHO^R*

UHH^



~'l
••
II

«5.D
'•
CORR
READ

L






/


it
O
FACTOR X CORRECTED REAt
X OF TOTAL PASSING
*&gg-





^r' ,
3^ ;
^
2S',
n '/
\<5
fiRAVPL Co" X «SAur, ^^ « "H *v.^LrT ^"O «
G AGEN
il DAT
PARTICL!
DIAMETE

T- K'AMAP03
E
5'




0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
CAL1R






•t




QTnoArtP inr.ATinN
 3£ COIMCCTION memoes
 -       DATE IN:_
 L-4 (5-85)   LOCATION:
                  . AND DCFLOCULCMT
                  	 SUPERVISOR:

-------
HYDROMETER
         —•«	- "BS&OT1
                             WORKftUFPT

SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED — -

X OF TOTAL PASSING





.
*?


SAMf
3"






»LE PRE
1 1/2"






•PERATI
3/4"




)00

ON
3/5"



f.sr,
*n'
WXs

N0.4



/* H
<^t| *

SIEVING TW <* '"
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
WET ._. DRY ,
TOTAL " ""!"'" r, ,* &
SAMPLE i/Oi /

RETAINED . > \.
OM MO. A „.,• _,. /i.y
NOSSING ^g^Vf

                    SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
                                                      SIEVING TIME
       WEIGHT
      RETAINED
.WEIGHT

PASSING
 % OF
 TOTAL
PASSING
FACTOR s

 8 (10)
                           MOISTURE DETERMINATION
  16
                                            MATERIAL
                                     MATERIAL
                                     HYGRO.
                                     MOISTURE
                                  .HYDRO.
                                  SAMPLE
 30(40)
               DISH NO.
                              CL-A
  50
               WT. WET SOL AND OBH
  100
                             WT. DRY SOL AlsD DBH
  200
               WT. DISH
 PAN
               WT. OF DRY SOIL
                       = w
                                             50.
TOTAL
               % MOISTURE
p,,N Bv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLIND
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
*.T3
f.Hf
— —
S..SS1
^.rg
^.ro*
f.^s1
14. W
10, HO
PP MO l\ 	 ,. gpppip

1C GRA\
/ITY
!? AMOUNT /
DISPERSIN
2. «0 n
•
TEST TIME
START' MIX
STOP MIX
•"•inb min
1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.





20.0
£0.0
20.0
20 tQ
7.1 . =i
2.\.^
HYD.
READ





aa.C?
\t.o
15.0
I3>.o
!O . O
*?j.O
CORR




/
S'Cj'

•'

r.o'
••
fliSB











it
O
rt
< 0
IU "Z.
« w
0 «g
UJ ^J
*- o-
o _,
s *
5 *-
S o
- :
x- O
R *
^
o
<
Ik
*#SSNGL





5///
»^ •?
<^3 /
/?• '
/4 '
^™j ^
V
GBAVPL rt," * SANO '•' ' '*; "'"I AV.^IT ' «
/5 ftrfp^T-^^/a/V^PO^
il DATE
PARTICLE .
DIAMETER




0.050 mm
0.037 mm
0.0 1 9 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
r AI IB






>.




STORAGE LOCATION
  COMICCTIOM IMCUAC5 TCM% MCHISCUS.


          DATE IN:
           OCFLOCULCNT


          	 SUPERVISOR:
L-4 (5-85)    LOCATION:

-------
HYDROMETER       GRADATJON ANALYSIS

RUN BY.
                         SAMPLE PREPERATION
                                                       SIEVING
     SIEVE SIZE
                   1 1/2
              3/4
                                3/8
                                                N0.4
SAMPLE WEIGHTS
   OF PAN AND SAMPLE
                                                              WET
                                                          BUY
 WT. OF PAN
 DRY WT. RETAINED
                                            TOTAL
                                            SAMPLE
 X OF TOTAL PASSING
                          (DO
                                           WX«
BIIM QV SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVING Tiw-=
SIEVE
NO.
8 (10)
16
30(40)
50
100
200
PAN
•^••^^•••MB
TOTAL
WEIGHT
RETAINED
*-».s-\
-J.14
l^.^^
14= 1^5
•?j-t.\Ti
bQ.C%


.WEIGHT
PASSING








% OF
TOTAL
PASSIN/G
77',
71 '
tn\ ',
3^JI
^ !
\°\ ;
. 	
	
FACTOR =J& =
W
- ;^3°^

- - MOISTURE DETERMINATION '\A:
.
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DGH
WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
»4
MATERIAL






"4
MATERIAL
r> -?rr
9S72.4/
jyK-/
V I f'.if
«?»l.-l •
= W
12. XT
HYGRO.
MOISTURE

111.39
!<**.*!
— — •?
/
0,31
HYDRO.
SAMPLE

SD-^^

i/
50,4,4

^UN Rv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINO
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
*•*?
sr. &

*.S7
9,&L
ei. (0
^r.fff
M.£&
10,3*
PP MO ^ SPECIF
r\ JS^', (-p,n-«.*j HATP /2 •
:>C GRAV
2*-?
fITY
ST AMOUNT— G
DISPERSING AGEN
trST" ml DAT

TEST TIME
START' MIX
STOP MIX
n e .•.!•.
1.0 mln
4.0 mln
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TfeMP.
o
/3,o
/// C?
9. 0
-I .0
rtPAVPI 17 ' It CAMO fo /9 *'

PARTICLI
OIAMETE
T LiV*A/4/=>0^
E
I"




O.OSO mm
0.037 mm
0.019 mm
0.009 mm
0.005 mm
0.002 mm
0.001 mm
r AI IR






v




STORAGE LOCATION
  comtecnoM IMCUOCS TIMF., MCNHCUS
L-4 (5-85D
DATE IN:_

LOCATION:
. AND OCFIOCULENT


  	 SUPERVISOR:

-------
HYDROMETER
                                       CAUTION:  HAZARDOU.
                  GBADt,TJL°^ALYS'S   MATHtlflJNJjS^
JOB NO. _L=
                     PART
   jnn WAUP  PDA
              PREP.
              CALC.
                                                           IO -«
HOLEfeH-aM DEPTH_^H
VISUAL DESCRIPTION:
SAMPLE NO.
r  .C'
                                     \\
                                             fi
B11N BV SAMPLE PREPERATION
SIEVE SIZE
OF PAN AND SAMPLE
WT. OF PAN
DRY WT. RETAINED —
«K^j^^B3W»=-
X OF TOTAL PASSING




— ^>
r .,-
•^*"

3"





1 1/2"





3/4"




/CO
»/8"



ft'l
^
NO.4



*7/-^C^>
^Q"l"\


.WEIGHT
PASSING








X OF
TOTAL
PASSING
7/7
U5 '/
zi ;
31' ,
& *
IT
—
—
FACTOR -^~


f.Slebb' • •

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
.
DISH NO.
WT. WET SOL AND DSH
WT. DRY SOL AND D6H
WT. DISH
WT. OF DRY SOIL
X MOISTURE
»4
MATERIAL






MATERIAL
f^-tCV
AZ*.A
u?fty
r^&^v\
•5>Z b -^
r W
9+f*
HYGRO.
MOISTURE
— -4v
£77^2*
47^,^
^ • «y
t I
1.Z&
HYDRO.
SAMPLE

S0,tk>

i
$or?z

B^N Ry HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
CYLINC
DISH N
CLOCK
TIME
g.f'S?
%.*6


2.147
g. SO
<9.o&
*\.<4~!
tj.Q-Z
lo»Sfc]
ep MO. ^-, 	 _ sp££)F
o. "Q-vsN0- PATP /Z/
1C GRAY
i*-*
/ITY
? AMOUNT
CISPERSIN
f2£~ „

TEST TIME
START- MIX
STOP MIX


1.0 min
4.0 min
19 min
60 min
7h 15 min
25h 45 min
TEMP.
C»





20'10
-2.0.0
•20,0
2CKP
1\.O
7.\ C5
HYO.
READ





ATo
1*4*9
>2.,0
1/4 1;
Q O
o».o
CH0V«R*




/
5i ^v.
-------
                      cnen ana associates, inc.
                      ATTERBERG LIMITS
SSS^
W""- •
"-••vi»-
•r-5?
*••'-*.•

••J-.^,
••' .
•;. •
-*
- *
"fcf
- n
• E
Z
Q
_
m
5
5








. f
i ' i :




. ,•













'




1 ' '


.

•






•
•













.

•











.






: - ;






















...



















.. ,.


..;
....
;•::


••'
.
•..
....




•







: t


...















,..




it-


. i




















'









• i.




• .,



• . i

i


; i


1 i , :
||-
::;.


. •

....


..




....
;ii.
.;•


(;..
1 •


:t




-


• .,


• •








'•







.


















                                         LDUDLMT.LL

                                         RUSTIC LMT. PL

                                         FLAsmcnv rcec.
                                       CAUTION:  HAZARDOUS
                                          MATERIAL IN USE
      10
           15   20
30   40 50 60  80 100
PLASTIC UMfT DETERMINATION
TRAY LOCATION
D6HNO.
Wr.OFWETSOLiDBH
WT.OFDRYSOL4DBH _V
WT.OFD&H •?->- .-.•'. - -
WT.OFWATBR '''vjv^?'^^-^----^'" ''
WATB1CCNTe --- ..-
••*-'• -• •:i"f" "





' .-,--•• -MS?
. -..
.:




... rr<>---
Vi^Sf^f
* ^"a£r:;:
..T«;.^-





-.-...









• : ,.- - .
.



••>•• - ^
j 	 .:• .
C"^ .
-.-•^- . *>

 -:" LH3 C5-853

-------
                    *;n«n ana associates, inc.
                     ATTERBERG LIMITS
                                      CAUTION:  HAZARDOUS
                                         MATERIAL IN USE
         15   20   .30   40 50 60

            ->-' ND,OFBLOWS,N
   80 100
                      PLASTIC UMIT DETERMINATION
 TRAY LOCATT3N
 DBHNa
 WT.OFWETSOL4D6H
 Wr.OFORYSOL&D6H
.fL£
 WT. OF DSH
                        10 -
      •H"-ST

                         '3,7/7
L-fl C5-853

-------
                         cnen ana associates, inc.
                          ATTERBERG LIMITS
                            UQUD UMTT DETERMWATION
    THAYLOCAICN
                                        -to
    WT.WET90C4DSH
    WT. DRV SOL & OGH
                                                                          "St.
                                                 1 1  .2,2

    WT. OF DRY SOL
    WATER CONTBir.wX
    NaOFBLOWS.N
                              33
*•• '••
'. .**
J-v:

-£» —
                    4-
                    J_
                                        &
                                        13-
                                               LOUDLMT. LL


                                               PLASTCLMT.PV.
                                                             Z/,6
                                                              7,6
                                             CAUTION:  HAZARDOUS
                                                MATERIAL IN USE
       TO     15   2D     30   40  SO 60  80 100
          -  :.:.-:,.-:•» NaOFa.ows.N
:" PLASTIC UMIT DETERMINATION '"= '••",.. '..-
TRAYLOCATCN -r
DBHNa
\VT.OFVVETSOL4DeH
WT.OFDRYSOL4D6H V»
wr.oFDGH :":•'"£'•• - .
WT. OF WATS* -*cl%i_. - '-
WAT® CONTB>
14. 0-/


£0
2/.g7
«^o . &^
ll^fe
-. •• .' •*--~!»rV.
}4»o-/
"—• '.-:-





. -.-•- .-


••




....... .......

•"*•;. •'.•• •-.
. >Ti . : .;r~

*••.'- -^
•-•^t*^r.>:
•:-^«-^':--
...*«w ^j. • .
.... •t*».— — —*-«..
* tijj-i^- " • •;
v JtwMu Urt *s« fc
•AS^ft*^
s?-
   L-fl (5-85)

-------
                            ana associates, inc.

                        ATTERBERG LIMITS
                      PART NO	L
                        DEPTH
                          LJOUD UMfT DETERMMAT1ON
                     30   405060*80100
.PREP./RUN BY.

CALC. BY.
    SAMPLE NO.
         v ^..
                                            h^r
                                             UQUDLMT. LL


                                             PLASTIC LMT. PI.



                                             PUSTX^IY ICEX PI
                             m
                                         CAUTION: HAZARDOUS
                                            MATERIAL IN  USE

                         PLASTC UMfT DETERMINATION
       LOCATON
    OSHNa
    Wr.OFWETSOL&OBH
    WT. OF DRY SOL & OGH
    W.OFDOH
                                       "•->•*:<
— ^.L-8 C5-853

-------
                     chen ana associates, inc.
                      ATTERBERG LIMITS
                           WORKSHEET
                                        -AK^\ f
JOB
NO..
                              V
                                       PREP./RUN BY.
   NAME
             -DATEJ
           .CKEO BY.
HOLE.
DESCRIPTION
                     DEPTH
SAMPLE NO.
                               I r>
                                                  rvvrs^ vV-
UQUD UMIT DETERMMATION
.TOAYLOCATON
O&iNQ.
WT. WET SCX 4 DBH
WT. DRV SOL & OGH
WT.OFOBH
WT.OFWAT5*v
WT. OF DRV SOL
WATH^ CONTENT. w%
NO. OF BLOWS. N






i\ n /
V




, r. L,













,^

















  I
                                          UOUDLMT.U.

                                          RJVSTICLMT.PI.

                                          PLAsncrrv roex. PI
                                       CAUTiOM:
                            HAZARDOUS
                            AL iN u
    10    15   20    X  40 50  60
               NO. OF BLOWS, N
        SO  100
PLASTIC UMIT DETERMINATION
TRAYLOCATDN
OSHNO.
WT. OF WET SOL & OSH
WT. OF DRY SOL & D6H
WT.OFDBH
WT. OF WATER
WATER CONTB/T.W* - Pl_
••









































-------
                     chen and associates, inc.
                      ATTERBERG LIMITS
                            WORKSHEET
   NO. _L^
JOB NAME. &-&A  A-*,
PART NO	L
PREP.
                                         BY.
unip  &,u . -vs. ^
  DEPTH
   SAMPLE NO	LL

UQUD UMTT DETERMMATION
.TRAYLOCATCN
DBHNa
WT.VMET SOLA OEM
WT. CRY SOL & D&l
WT.OFDBH
WT.OFWATWx
WT. OF DRY SOL
WATB4 CONTENT. wX
NO. OF BU7WS.N












j* / n
Ntr.
f y






/
f




__

















  I
• • 1





















: 1 | i


1.'

-TH+
ill
' : ! '

i • . .
: i 1 .


• . , ,
i • • :
i
....




1 1

[ :



H 	
1 '

: , .
; : i •
1 : : •


1 •
. ; ,





' i :
. 1 •






















: _ ,





• • :
1 -
:
1 ' . '



•









j i i ;
! •





( - •

'








. •!:
i T
i
'.

n

'i''

..,:
'!"

''!

•i|
"il
!>!
;••:.





1 '



...

^1:

• i:>
•••.

• c


•i..





i||:

' II
i
i ! •

-rrt-
i'

' i • '
• • i .
i . r
1 1 : -

'

: 1 .

1,1.


i Ml
T it
+4i-
'I'l
li-
I'l-


I : i •

. - >
!ili
• <<
ij:i
' •',




: ,
:

I •'

llj>
Fii
1"
1 •
"•
')::

•r
'•




i

1 1 •• .
I , ,
i..
• ' •
, - •
t •
I
&•
r





:>'••.

'.'


;:


i,.-






•'!•






"-\


..1
'1.
l'-










lOCUAT.UL

Dl ACTV^fTV *FfY Qt
CAUTION: HA2MKDOUS
MAlERIALINUSE
    10     15  20    30   40 50  60
                Na OF BLOWS. N
             80 KB
PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION
TRAY LOCATON
DCSHNO.
WT. OF WET SOL & DBH
WT.OFDRYSOL&DBH
WT.OFD&I
WT. OF WATER
WATER CONTENT,** - Pl_










































-------
                          Appendix B
          BASELINE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
GLT959/020.50-2

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                              Appendix B
                 BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT
                           INTRODUCTION

This appendix presents the results of the baseline risk assessment for the G&H
Landfill site. The purpose of the baseline risk assessment is to characterize the
potential human health risk from the G&H Landfill site to support a decision
whether to proceed with a feasibility study of potential remedial actions.

A baseline risk  assessment is an evaluation of the potential threats  to public
health from the site, in absence of any remedial action (i.e., the no-action
alternative) (U.S. EPA 1988c).  It identifies and characterizes the toxicity of
contaminants of concern, the potential  exposure pathways, the potential human
receptors, and the extent of expected threat under the conditions defined for the
site.

The no-action alternative assumes that  no corrective actions take place  and no
restrictions are placed on future use of the site.  Based on the definition of no
action, the baseline risk assessment addressed potential risks from the site under
current and feasible future land uses.  Evaluation of a no-action alternative is
required under  Section 300.68(f)(l)(v)  of the National Contingency Plan (NCP)
(U.S. EPA 1985).

BASIS OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT

The baseline risk assessment was performed consistent with the following
guidances and advisories:
                                   B-l

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

            U.S. EPA risk assessment guidelines (U.S. EPA 1986a, 1986b,
            1986c, and 1986d)

      •     Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund:  Volume 1—Human
            Health Evaluation Manual (U.S. EPA 1989d)

            Exposure Factors Handbook (U.S. EPA  1989c)

This assessment is based on the following major assumptions:

      •     No remedial actions

      •     No land use  restrictions,  except no development on the landfill due
            to geotechnical limitations

      •     For the purpose of risk calculations, contaminant concentrations
            will not change over time

This risk assessment is based on the data collected during Phase III of the
remedial investigation (unless otherwise specified) and is presented in  Chapter 3.
Data collected from other phases of the RI are  used to support the data from
the Phase III investigations.

ORGANIZATION

This appendix is organized into the following sections:

      •     Identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern.  Identifies the
            chemicals evaluated in the  assessment.
                                    B-2

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
      •      Toxicity Assessment.  Summarizes the toxicity of the selected
            chemicals and the relationship between magnitude of exposure and
            adverse health effects.

      •      Exposure Assessment.  Estimates the magnitude of actual or
            potential human exposures, the frequency and duration of these
            exposures, and the pathways by which the exposures occur.

      •      Public Health Risk Characterization. Integrates the toxicity and
            exposure assessments to estimate the potential risks to public
            health and the environment from exposure to site chemicals.

      •      Limitations and Assumptions.  Summarizes the basic assumptions
            used in the risk  assessment and limitations of data and
            methodology.

Information used to support this  risk assessment is presented in the
accompanying appendixes. The method used to assess public health risk is
outlined in Appendix C.  The risk calculation data tables are presented in
Appendix D.
 IDENTIFICATION OF CHEMICALS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

The analytical data collected for the site underwent data validation procedures
described in Technical Memorandum No. 10 (Appendix A).  After data
validation, the data were reviewed to eliminate results that may represent
contamination of samples in the laboratory or  in the field or that failed to meet
                                   B-3

-------
Page 1 of 3
                                                              Table B-l
                                                COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY MEDIA
                                                       G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
POLYNUCLEAR AROMATICS
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
Indeno[ 1 ,2,3-cd]pyrene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS
2 ,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenol
PHTHALATES
B is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
B utylbenzylphthalate
Diethylphthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
D i-n-octy Iphthalate
Surface
Son

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X













Subsurface
Soil

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X



X
X
X

X
X


X

(a) Industrial (b)
Leachate Residential Momitoring Surface
Sediments Wells Wells Wells Water

X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XX
X
X XX
X X
X XX
X XX

X

XX X
X X
X XX

X XX
X X
X
X
X XX
X
 OTHER SEMI-VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
    Benzole acid
    Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
    Chlorobenzene
  4-Chloroaniline
    Dibenzofuran
  1,2-Dichlorobenzene
X

X

X
             X
X
X
X
 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
    Arochlor 1242
    Arochlor 1248                       X
    Arochlor 1254                       X
    Arochlor 1260                       X
X
X
X
                                       X

-------
Page 2 of 3
                                                      Table B-l
                                         COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY MEDIA
                                                G & H LANDFILL SITE
Surface
Chemical Soil
PESTICIDES
betaBHC
Chlordane X
4,4-DDE X
4,4-DDT X
delta BHC
Endosulfan I X
Endosulfan II X
Endosulfan Sulfate
gamma BHC(Lindane) X
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide X
BENZENE/TOLUENE/XYLENE (BTX)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Xylenes
OTHER VOLATILES
Styrene
Carbon disulfide
KETONES
Acetone
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
HALOGEN ATED ALKENES & ALKANES
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloroethane
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Subsurface
Soil Sediments



X X
X




X
X X
X X
X X
X X

X

X X
X X

X

X
X X

X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X

(a) Industrial
Leachate Residential
Wells Wells









X X
X
X X
X X



X






X
X
X


X
X

X
X
00
Momitoring Surface
Wells Water



X
X





X
X
X X
X X

X

X
X
X
X

X

X
X
X
X

X
X



X

-------
Page 3 of 3
                                                                 Table B-l
                                                  COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY MEDIA
                                                          G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
INORGANIC CHEMICALS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
DIOXINS and FURANS
Heptachlorodioxin
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
Hexachlorodibenzofuran
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
Pentachlorodibenzofuran
Surface Subsurface
SoU Soil

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
Sediments

X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X









(a) Industrial
Leachate Residential
Wells Wells

X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X









(b)
Momitoring Surface
Wells Water

X

X
X


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X

X
X









 (a) Leachate well samples taken from west side of Phase III landfill.
 (b) Surface water samples collected from surface water in oil seep area only.

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

quality control guidelines (e.g., insufficient surrogate spike recovery).  Estimated
results (data with a "J" qualifier) that met data validation requirements were
used in this assessment.  Data were also reviewed and eliminated on
consideration of background concentrations.

After this review, 108 chemicals on the U.S. EPA Target Compound List (TCL)
remained. These chemicals are presented by media of occurrence in Table B-l.

From this group of chemicals a subset of chemicals was identified as chemicals
of potential concern to be used in this risk  assessment.  This subset of
66 chemicals  is presented by selection criteria in Table B-2.

Chemicals of potential concern were selected using the following steps:

       •      All chemicals that had a toxicity value (i.e., slope factor or
             reference dose) available through EPA's Integrated Risk
             Information System (IRIS) (U.S. EPA 1990) or published in the
             quarterly Health Effects Summary Table (HEAST) (U.S. EPA
             1989e) were identified. Chemicals from this group were eliminated
             from consideration if they were detected infrequently (i.e., less than
             10 percent of samples in a media) and did not represent chemical
             "hot spots" or only detected in an environmental media not
             associated  with potential exposures at the site.

       •      Some chemicals were selected if they were lexicologically significant
             (e.g., the noncarcinogenic PNAs which may act as cocarcinogens)
             even if they did not have a toxicity value
                                    B-4

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                         Table B-2
       POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN AND SELECTION CRITERIA
                                   G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Selection Based on
Toxicity Value or
 Current Standard
Selection Based on
  Other Factors
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
Aluminum
Anthracene
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benz6[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzole Acid
Beryllium
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
2-Butanone
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroe thane
Chloroform
Chromium
Chrysene
Copper
Cyanide
DDT
Dibenzfa ,h]anthracene
Di-butyl phthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
Diethyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
       a/d
       b/d
       b/d
       b/d
        c
        c
        c
        c
        b
        a
       a/d
       b/d
      a/b/d
       a/d
       a/b
      a/b/d
        a
      a/b/d
       a/d

      a/b/d
      a/b/d
        c
       a/d
       a/d
      a/b/d
        c
       a/d
       a/b
       b/d
      a/b/d
       a/d
       a/d
       a/d
        e
        e
        e
        e
        e
        e
        e
        e

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                         Table B-2
       POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN AND SELECTION CRITERIA
                                   G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                  Selection Based on
                                  Toxicity Value or                  Selection Based on
Chemical	Current Standard	Other Factors

Fluoranthene                              -                                 e
Fluorene                                  -                                 e
Indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene                     c                                 e
Iron                                      d
Lead                                    a/d                                e
Manganese                               a/d                                e
Mercury                                 a/d
2-Methylnaphthalene                       -                                 e
4-Methyl-2-pentanone                     a
2-Methylphenol                           a
4-Methylphenol                           a
Methylene chloride                        a/b
Naphthalene                               a                                 e
Nickel                                   a/d                                e
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine                   b/d
PCS                                    b/d                                e
Phenanthrene                              -                                 e
Phenol                                   a/d                                e
Pyrene                                    a                                 e
Selenium                                a/d
Silver                                   a/d
Tetrachloroethene                        a/b/d                               e
Toluene                                 a/d                                e
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane                     a/d                                e
1,1,2-Trichloroethane                    a/b/d                               e
Trichloroethene                          b/d                                e
Vanadium                                a
Vinyl chloride                            b/d                                e
Xylenes                                 a/d                                e
Zinc                                    a/d                                e
 NOTES:
   a  -  Selected based on having a reference dose value.
   b  -  Selected based on having a cancer slope factor.
   c  -  Selected based on being a carcinogenic PAH, and slope factor based on Benzo[a]pyrene.
   d  -  Selected based on having a current drinking water standard or criteria.
   e  -  Selected based on frequency of occurrence and relative abundance.

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

       •      Some chemicals were included if they were detected frequently or
             of high concentrations even if they did  not have a toxicity value.

Chemicals not selected by this screening process are  presented in Table B-3.
The  absence of these chemicals from the risk assessment does not imply that
exposure to any of these chemicals is without risk. Exclusion of these
compounds, however, should not significantly alter the outcome of the risk
assessment.

                        TOXICITY ASSESSMENT

Toxicity assessment comprises two general steps.  The first step, hazard
identification, is the process of determining what adverse health effects, if any
can result from exposure to a particular chemical. The second step, dose
response evaluation, quantitatively examines the relationship between the level of
exposure and the incidence  of adverse health effects in  an exposed population.

This section summarizes the lexicological characteristics of representative
chemicals of potential concern at the G&H  landfill site.  The dose  response
relationships for all of the chemicals of potential  concern  having toxicity values
are summarized.

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

For  the purpose of this risk assessment, human health effects are divided  into
two  broad groups—carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic  effects.  This division is
based  on the mechanism of action currently associated with each category.  For
purposes of discussion,  chemicals are therefore divided into two groups based on
                                     B-5

-------
                                                              Table B-3
                                    CRITERIA FOR THE EXCLUSION OF CHEMICALS FROM THE RISK ASSESSMENT
                                                        G & H LANDFILL SITE
Compound
Calcium *
4-Chloroaniline
Chlordane
Cobalt *
DDE
1 ,2,-Dichlorobenzene
2 ,4-Dinitrophenol
Dimethylphthalate *
Dioxins and furans
Endolsulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate *
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
2-Hexanone *
Lindane
Magnesium
Potassium *
Sodium *
Styrene
Thallium
Tin *
Infrequency Low
Of Concentrations Essential
Detection Detected Nutrient
X
X X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X

X
X
X X
X
X
Below
Background
Limits
X

X
X
X



X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X



Comments


Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.

Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.



Concentrations detected in media where no potential
for exposure exists. Higher concentrations in surface
soils detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.
Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.

Higher concentrations of pesticides detected offsite.






* No toxicity value available for this chemical.

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

associated effects—carcinogens and noncarcinogens.  Some chemicals are
considered to be in both categories.

Carcinogens

Carcinogens are chemicals that cause or induce cancer.  Carcinogenic effects
demonstrate a nonthreshold response mechanism.  This means there is no level
of exposure (i.e., threshold) to a carcinogen that will not result in the possibility
of developing cancer.

U.S. EPA has developed a carcinogen classification system (U.S. EPA 1986d)
using a weight-of-evidence approach to classify the likelihood that a chemical is
a human carcinogen.  Information considered in developing the classification
includes human studies of the association between cancer incidence and
exposure as well as long-term animal studies under controlled laboratory
conditions.  Other supporting evidence considered includes short-term tests for
genotoxicity, metabolic and pharmacokinetics properties, lexicological effects
other than cancer, structure-activity relationships, and physical/chemical
properties  of the chemical.

Of the  chemicals detected at the site,  33 are classified as known (Class A),
probable (Class Bl and B2), or possible (Class C) human  carcinogens by the
U.S. EPA  Carcinogen Assessment Group. These chemicals  and the definitions
of the EPA classification  are presented in Table B-4.

Noncarcinogens

Chemicals causing noncarcinogenic effects (i.e., systemic toxins),  in contrast,
exhibit  a level of exposure from above zero to some finite value that can be
                                     B-6

-------
                                                                               Tables B-4
                                                                        CARCINOGENIC POTENCIES
                                                                           G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
Arsenic
Benzene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perlyene
Beryllium
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chromium VI
Chyrsene
ODD
DDT
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Indeno[l ,2,3-cd]pyrene
Lead
Methylene chloride
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
PCB
PAHs
1 , 1 ,2,2 Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Oral Route:
Weight-of Slope Factor
Evidence (mg/kg-day)-l
A
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
-
B2
B2
.
C
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2/C
C
B2
C
B2
A
2
0.029
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
-
1.1
0.014
-
-
0.13
0.0061
.
11.5
0.24
0.34
11.5
0.091
0.091
0.6
11.5
-
0.0075
0.0049
7.7
11.5
0.2
0.051
0.057
0.011
2.3
Inhalation Route:
a Weight-of Slope Factor
Source Date Evidence (mg/kg-day)-l
e
IRIS
d
d
d
b
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
-
IRIS
IRIS
-
d
IRIS
IRIS
d
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST(v)
b
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
f
HEAST
e
12-1-88
d
d
d
b
d
9-7-88
3-1-88
8-1-89
9-7-88
-
6-30-88
6-30-88
.
d
8-22-88
8-22-88
d
7-1-89
8-1-89
12-1-88
d
9-26-88
10- -89
3- -88
7- -89
b
3- -88
7- -89
9-26-88
f
7-1-89
A
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
Bl
B2
B2
A
62
-
B2
B2
-
B2
C
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2/C
C
B2
C
B2
A
50
0.029
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
8.4
1.1
-
-
6.1
0.13
0.081
41
6.1
-
0.34
6.1
-
0.091
1.2
6.1
-
0.014
-
-
6.11
0.2
0.0033
0.057
0.017
0.295
Source
IRIS
IRIS
d
d
d
c
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
d
-
IRIS
d
-
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
c
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
f
HEAST
Date
10-1-89
12-1-88
d
d
d
c
d
9-7-88
3-1-88
8-1-89
9-7-88
3-1-88
6-30-88
6-30-88
3-1-88
d
-
8-22-88
d
-
8-1-89
12-1-88
d
9-26-88
10-1-89
3-1-88
7-1-89
c
3-1-88
7-1-89
9-26-88
f
7-1-89
a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document for PAHs. U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Health Effects Assessment for Benzo[a]pyrene. U.S. EPA 1984.
d. Based on bcnzo[a]pyrene.
e. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5 (ug/l)-l. U.S. EPA  1988.
f. Withdrawn from IRIS us of 7-1-89, still listed in HEAST as verified on IRIS on 7-1-89

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

tolerated by the organism without causing an observed health effect.  It is
believed that organisms may have adaptive mechanisms that must be overcome
before a toxic endpoint (effect) is manifested. Noncarcinogenic health effects
include a variety of toxic effects on body systems ranging from renal toxicity
(toxicity to the kidney) to central nervous system disorders.   Non-carcinogenic
health effects fall into two basic categories—acute toxicity and chronic toxicity.
Acute toxicity occurs after a single exposure (usually at high doses) and the
effect is seen immediately.  Chronic toxicity occurs after repeated exposure
(usually at low doses) and is seen weeks, months, or years after the initial
exposure.

Toxicity Profiles

Because of the large number of chemicals associated with the site, this section
presents summary toxicity profiles for a select number of contaminants of
potential concern.  These chemicals are representative of the  major contaminant
groups present at the site.  Summary toxicity profiles  are presented in
Table B-5.  These  profiles describe four categories of potential toxic effects:
acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, and the effects  (such as
mutagenicity).   Detailed toxicity profiles for these chemicals can be found in the
lexicological literature.

DOSE-RESPONSE EVALUATIONS

Toxicity is dependent upon the dose or concentration of the  substance (i.e., the
dose-response relationship).  Toxicity values are quantitative expressions of the
dose-response relationship for a chemical.  Toxicity values take the form  of
reference doses and  cancer potency factors, both of which are specific to
exposure routes.
                                      B-7

-------
TableB-5,  Page lot7
Table B-S
Summary of Toxicity Profiles of Selected Chemicals
G&H Landfill
Acenaphthene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Toxic by inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure. In
humans, may be irritating to skin and mucous membranes.
Ingestion of large quantities may cause vomiting.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Subchronic oral exposure in laboratory animals has caused
morphological damage to liver and kidneys and mild bron-
chitis.
Cancer Potential
No evidence of carcinogenic effects, but data are lacking.

Antimony
Acute Toxicity Summary
Many antimony compounds irritate the  gastrointestinal
tract; antimony tartar has been used as an emetic; intoxi-
cation results in severe vomiting and diarrhea. With occu-
pational inhalation exposures, rhinitis and acute pulmonary
edema may occur.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Inhalation  of some antimony compounds can produce
rhinitis, pharyngitis, tracheitis, bronchitis, and pneumoco-
niosis with obstructive lung disease  and emphysema.
Transient spots on the skin have been reported in workers.
Antimony may form stibine gas, which causes hemolysis.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Trivalent or pentavalent compounds. In  mutation tests,
some antimony compounds were positive in human lym-
phocytes and Syrian hamster embryo cells. Trivalent anti-
mony compounds were used for treatment of parasites.

Arsenic
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute oral exposure can cause muscular cramps, facial
swelling, cardiovascular reactions, severe gastrointestinal
damage, and vascular collapse leading to death. Sensory
loss and hematopoietic symptoms delayed after exposure
to high concentrations are usually reversible. Inhalation
exposures can cause severe irritation of nasal lining, larynx,
and bronchi.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic oral or inhalation exposure can produce changes in
skin, including hyperpigmentation and  hyperkeratosis;
peripheral  neuropathy; liver  injury; cardiovascular  disor-
ders; oral exposures associated with peripheral vascular
disease; and blackfoot disease.
Cancer Potential
Known human carcinogen; oral exposures associated with
skin cancer, inhalation exposures with lung cancer.
Other
May be essential. Toxicity varies for different compounds;
inorganic trivalent arsenic compounds usually more toxic
than pentavalent compounds; high doses  of some inor-
ganic arsenic compounds to  pregnant laboratory animals
produced malformations in offspring.

Barium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Ingestion of barium salts can cause prolonged muscular
stimulation, gastroenteritis, hypokalemia, and cardiovas
cular effects such as ventricular fibrillation and extra systo-
les.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Prolonged occupational inhalation has resulted in barito-
sis—a benign, reversible pneumoconiosis.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Toxicity of compounds depends on solubility.

Benzene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposures (inhalation) to high levels of benzene may
lead to depression of the central nervous system, uncon-
sciousness, and death or may cause fatal cardiac arrhyth-
mias.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Major toxic effect is hematopoietic toxicity (affects forma-
tion of blood); chronic exposure of workers to low levels
has been associated with blood disorders, such as leuke-
mia and aplastic anemia (depression of all three cell types
of the blood in the absence of functioning marrow).
Cancer Potential
Sufficient evidence that benzene  is a human and animal
carcinogen; strong correlation between exposure to ben-
zene by inhalation and leukemia.
Other
Chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow and blood have
been reported in experimental animals and some workers.

Benzolajan thracene
Acute Toxicity Summary
No information is available on short-term dermal or inhala-
tion effects.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
No information on systemic effects. PAHs as a group may
cause skin disorders and immunosuppressive effects.
Cancer Potential
Evidence exists that benzo[a]anthracene is carcinogenic to
laboratory animals through dermal and ingestion exposure
routes. Inhalation data is not available. May cause skin and
lung cancer. No reports relating cancer in humans from
exposure to benzo[a]anthracene exclusively, but exposure
from PAH mixtures.
Other
Mutagenic in laboratory experiments. benzo[a]anthracene
may be metabolized into reactive derivatives.

Benzo[a]pyrene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute toxicity appears low when administered by oral or
dermal routes to laboratory animals.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Prolonged exposure may produce chronic dermatitis and
reproductive changes. Repeated oral doses to mice have
caused hyppplastic anemia. Induction of cancer is the key
toxic endpoint from intermediate and long-term exposure.
Cancer Potential
Benzo[a]pyrene is a constituent of coal tar, which is classi-
fied as a Level 1 known carcinogen by IARC and a Level B2
probable  carcinogen by the EPA. Ingestion may produce
stomach tumors, and inhalation may produce lung cancer.
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90

-------
Table B-5,  Page  2 of 7

Benzo[a]pyrene (Continued)
Prolonged skin exposure has been linked to an increase in
skin cancer among  workers.
Other
Benzolalpyrene is considered to be the most potent car-
cinogenic PAH.  It is also a mutagen.

Benzo[b]fluoran thene
Acute Toxicity Summary
No information is available.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Systemic effects specific to benzo[b]fluoranthene have
not been reported.
Skin disorders and immunosuppressive effects have been
reported for PAH mixtures.
Cancer Potential
Experimental evidence that it causes lung and skin cancer
in laboratory animals by dermal absorption and intratrach-
eal distillation.
Other
No evidence of reproductive or teratogenic effects.

Beryllium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute  lung disease (chemical  pneumonitis) has been
observed immediately after inhalation of aerosols of sol-
uble beryllium compounds, such as beryllium fluoride and
compounds (probably  zinc beryllium silicate) in  broken
fluorescent light tubes. Several months after exposure the
entire respiratory tract may become inflamed with fulmi-
nating pneumonitis in severe reactions. Recoveries usually
occur within weeks, but fatalities have occurred. In studies
with monkeys,  high concentrations of aerosols of beryl-
lium fluoride or beryllium phosphate produced severe lung
reactions in all animals and damaged the liver and kidney as
well as affecting adrenals, pancreas, thyroid, and spleen;
many lesions were similar to those in patients who died of
pneumonitis. Conjunctivitis and contact dermatitis may
follow exposure to beryllium, with skin  lesions or ulcera-
tiqns. Beryllium compounds may produce hypersensitivity
with delayed allergic reactions.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
The lung is a major target  organ for toxic effects  of
beryllium.  Berylliosis, a chronic granulomatous lung dis-
ease that is frequently fatal, has been described for over 40
years among workers exposed  to  insoluble beryllium
compounds; symptoms may include shortness of  breath,
cyanosis, clubbed fingers, lesions that progress to  fibrotic
tissue and nodules with respiratory dysfunction.
Cancer Potential
Beryllium compounds  or alloys  have  produced cancer in
rats, rabbits, and monkeys. Lung tumors have been re-
ported in rats and monkeys exposed by inhalation, intratra-
cheally, or intrabronchial implantation, and bone tumors
have been produced in rabbits after intravenous or intraos-
seus administration. Excess lung cancer has been  ob-
served in some studies of workers occupationally exposed
to beryllium, but data on exposure and confounding factors
were  lacking. Beryllium  and its compounds have been
classified by IARC as having sufficient evidence of being
carcinogenic in  animals and limited evidence in humans
(group 2B) and by EPA as B1, probable human carcinogen.
Other
Wide variations in individual sensitivity have  been re-
ported, perhaps because of an immune  reaction; individu-
als exposed to low doses may exhibit severe effects.
Beryllium is stored in the body for many years with  detect-
able amounts in lung reported as long as 23 years after
exposure. Some beryllium compounds are mutagenic in in
vitro tests.

Cadmium
Acute Toxicity Summary
For acute exposures by ingestion, symptoms of cadmium
toxicity included nausea,  vomiting, diarrhea,  muscular
cramps, salivation, spasms, drop in blood pressure, ver-
tigo, loss of consciousness,  and collapse. Acute  renal
failure, liver damage, and death may occur. Exposure by
inhalation can cause irritation, coughing, labored respira-
tion, vomiting, acute chemical pneumonitis, and pulmo-
nary edema.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Respiratory and renal toxicity are major effects in workers.
Chronic oral exposures can produce kidney damage. Cad-
mium accumulates in  kidney, and nephropathy results
after critical concentration in kidney is reached, probably
about 200 \ig/g. Inhalation can cause chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease, including bronchitis, progressive fibre-
sis, and emphysema. Chronic exposure affects calcium
metabolism and can cause loss of calcium from bone, bone
pain, osteomalacia, and osteoporosis. Chronic exposure
may be associated with hypertension. Cadmium can pro-
duce testicular atrophy, sterility, and teratogenic effects in
experimental animals.
Cancer Potential
Increased risk of prostate cancer and perhaps respiratory
tract cancer in workers exposed by inhalation. No evidence
of carcinogenicity from chronic oral exposure.
Other
A nonessential element.

Carbon Tetrachloride
Acute Toxicity Summary
Fatalities have occurred in humans, with death after inges-
tion of as little as 1.5 ml and average lethal doses of 70 to
140 mg/kg  body weight. Exposure to high dosages of
carbon tetrachloride can cause CNS depression. Changes
in the liver of animals have been reported after a single oral
dose and may include rapid lipid accumulation, single cell
necrosis, membrane effects, and liver necrosis within 24
hours, but some changes may be reversed.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Exposure can produce liver and kidney damage in humans.
Classic hepatotoxic, liver necrosis, and fat accumulation
have been  reported in humans,  monkeys, rats, mice,
rabbits, guinea  pigs, hamsters, cats, dogs, sheep, and
cattle. After inhalation CNS depression, pulmonary edema,
and fatal cardiac arrhythmias have been described. Encepha-
lopathy and neuropathological alterations have also been
observed in rats exposed for several weeks.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogen (liver tumors) in mice and rats; suggestive case
reports of humans exposed to carbon tetrachloride who
develop liver tumors several years later [IARC].
Other
Fetotoxic in mice; retarded development in rats; synergis-
tic with alcohol, producing liver injury.

Chloroform
Acute Toxicity Summary
Anesthetic depresses CNS. Fatalities in humans may be
rapid, resulting from cardiac arrest (apparently sensitiza-
tion to epinephrine) or delayed with kidney and liver dam-
age. Respiratory depression, coma, and liver and kidney
damage are among the symptoms of exposure to chloro-
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90

-------
Table 8-5,  Page 3 of 7

Chloroform  (Continued)
form.  In laboratory animals, acute toxicity depends on
species, strain, sex, and age; liver damage may be cause
of death in rats and mice after acute exposure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Kidney damage (renal tubular necrosis) can occur in mice,
and kidney and liver damage in  rats, rabbits,  dogs, and
guinea pigs exposed by inhalation.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in mice (hepatomas, hepatocellular carcino-
mas), male rats (malignant kidney tumors), and female rats
(thyroid tumors).
Other
Fetotoxic in rats and rabbits.

Chromium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Major acute effect from oral exposure is renal tubular
necrosis. Inhalation of chromate salts results in irritation
and inflammation of nasal mucosa, ulceration, and perfora-
tion of nasal septum.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic exposure to  hexavalent chromium has resulted in
kidney damage in animals and humans. Inhalation expo-
sures to chromates in industrial settings have resulted in
nasal membrane inflammation, chronic rhinitis, laryngitis,
and pharyngitis. Exposures to skin can result in allergic skin
reactions in sensitive individual. Overall, hexavalent forms
are usually more toxic than trivalent forms.
Cancer Potential
Excess lung cancer has been associated with  chromate-
producing industry workers. Chromatic salts are carcino-
genic in  rats exposed by inhalation.
Other
Essential element. Toxicity is related to valence state.

Chrysene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute toxic effects have not been descried.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chrysene accumulates in adipose and mammary tissues.
Chronic toxic effects have not been described.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in laboratory animals exposed to long-term
dermal doses.
Other
Limited evidence that Chrysene is mutagenic. Epidemiol-
ogical reports incidences of skin cancer when exposed to
PAH mixtures that included chrysene.

Copper
Acute Toxicity Summary
Inhalation of copper dusts result in symptoms similar to
metal fume fever. Exposure to metal fumes results in
upper respiratory tract irritation, metallic or sweet taste,
metal fume fever, and skin and hair discoloration. Exposure
to dusts and mists of copper salt result in congestion of
nasal mucous  membranes,  sometimes of pharynx, and
occasional  ulceration with perforation of nasal septum.
Acute copper sulfate poisoning  in  humans  (oral) some-
times fatal; includes vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension, coma,
and jaundice.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Hemolytic anemia after chronic exposure in some dialysis
patients. Sensitive individuals with disorders of metabo-
lism—Wilson's disease and Menke's disease.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Essential nutrient. Organoleptic threshold in water be-
tween  1 to 5 mg/l.


DDT
Acute Toxicity Summary
In animals, early effects include abnormal susceptibility to
fear, violent reactions to stimuli, motor unrest, hyperirrita-
bility, tremors, convulsions, weight loss and decreased
food intake, and death from respiratory arrest. In humans,
a significant symptoms include paresthesia of mouth, face,
and tongue; dizziness; disturbance of equilibrium; tremors
in the extremities; confusion; malaise; headache; fatigue;
delayed vomiting; and in severe cases, convulsions. Other
effects include motor  unrest and tremors that proceed
from fine tremors to coarse tremors with voluntary move-
ments. Onset  is 30  minutes to 6 hours after ingestion,
recovery within several days, depending on severity. Fatali-
ties have occurred, usually after suicidal ingestion of un-
known dosesof solutions of DDT. Palpitations and tachycar-
dia have been reported. Mature laboratory animals exhibit
convulsions, increased respiration and heart rate, and
increased  sensitivity to low temperatures.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
While the CMS is the principle target for the toxic effects of
DDT and sensory and  motor nerve fibers and the motor
cortex are affected, pathologic changes occur in the liver
after chronic or subacute exposures; effects on liver in-
clude enlargement, histologic changes, and centrilobular
necrosis. DDT induces the  microsomal enzymes in the
liver thatare responsible for its metabolism. Morphological
changes in kidneys  of animals have been observed. In
chickens,  DDT injected subcutaneously inhibits testicular
growth and secondary characteristics. Estrogenic effects
have been produced by single or multiple doses in rodents.
DDT can sensitize the myocardium to epinephrine. Similar
effects are seen in single or repeated doses,  except
debilitation and malnutrition from starvation may  be pro-
duced with chronic exposure.
Cancer Potential
DDT produces liver tumors in mice.
Other
Species differences are marked in susceptibility to acute
poisoning after oral exposure. DDT powder  is absorbed
poorly through the skin.

DDT is metabolized to DDE and stored in adipose tissue
and is  slowly  eliminated in humans. Other metabolites
include ODD and DDA.

Dibenzo[a,h]an thracene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute toxic effects have not been described.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic toxic effects have not been described.
Cancer Potential
I ARC [ 1983] has concluded that there is sufficient evidence
that dibenzo[a,h]anthracene is carcinogenic to laboratory
animals. In laboratory experiments oral doses have caused
tumors in mice, lung tumors  in rats  by   intratracheal
distillation and skin cancer following dermal application.
Other
High doses in laboratory animals have produced fetal
deaths.
GL068800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90

-------
Table B-5, Page 4 of 7

1,1-Dichloroethane
Acute Toxicity Summary
CNS depression may occur when 1,1-dichloroethane is
inhaled at high concentrations. Irritating to skin.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Data limited.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.


/, 1-Dichloroethene   (Vinylidene
chloride)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Liver appears to be principal target. Biochemical changes
and necrosis in liver in fasted rats have been reported to
develop rapidly after inhalation. Liver damage in fasted rats
can occur after one  oral dose. At high  concentrations,
inhalation of 1,1 -DCE can cause CNS depression in hu-
mans and unconsciousness.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Described as "exquisite hepatotoxin" because it is more
potent and faster acting than classic hepatotoxin, carbon
tetrachloride. Kidney injury can also occur at relatively low
doses. Reports of health effects on workers exposed to
1,1-DCE include liver function  abormalties, headaches,
vision problems,  weakness, fatigue, and neurological
sensory disturbances.
Cancer Potential
One group of investigators reported an increased inci-
dence of kidney tumors in mice exposed by inhalation and
possibly mammary tumors in rats. Tumor initiator activity
in mouse skin following several treatments with phorbol as
promoter has been described.
Other
Structure similar to vinyl chloride, a known human carcino-
gen; mutagenic in bacterial tests; may  be fetotoxic in
laboratory animals.


1,2-Dichloroethane
Acute Toxicity Summary
CNS depression, lung irritation, and injury to liver, kidney,
and adrenal have been reported. Deaths in humans ex-
posed by ingestion or inhalation may result from circulatory
and respiratory failure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic exposure can cause liver degeneration and kidney
damage in laboratory animals. Eye damage (necrosis of
cqrneal epithelium) has been observed in dogs injected
with 1,2-dichloroethane. Repeated exposures have been
associated with anorexia, nausea, liverand kidney dysfunc-
tion, and neurological disorders in workers.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in mice and rats exposed orally.
Other
Mutagenic in some tests in bacteria, barley, and fruit flies.


cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Anesthetic at high concentrations; appears half as potent
as transisomer in depressing CNS; elevated liver enzymes
in  rats reported after one exposure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Minimal fatty accumulation in liver of rats chronically ex-
posed to high doses of cis-1,2-DCE in drinking water.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Inhalation exposure to high levels can cause narcosis and
death in rats.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Rats exposed by inhalation exhibited fatty accumulation in
liver and infiltration of lungs.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.

Dichloromethane (Methylene chlo-

Acute Toxicity Summary
Acts on the CNS, causing narcosis; affects the liver. Fatali-
ties have been associated with acute or prolonged expo-
sure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
In animals chronic exposure can affect the liver and kidney.
Damage to liverand CNS following long-term occupational
exposure has been reported.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogen in laboratory animals.
Other
Mutagenic in some bacterial tests.

Eth yI benzene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Ethylbenzene is  irritating to  eyes, mucous membranes,
and skin. It can cause headaches and narcosis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Data limited.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.

Fluoranthene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Toxic by oral and dermal absorption. Can cross epithelial
membranes. A defatting agent that may affect the skin.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Limited information available.
Cancer Potential
IARC [1983] concluded there is no evidence that fluoran-
thene is carcinogenic on the basis of available data.
Other
When applied to laboratory animal skin simultaneously
with other carcinogenic PAHs, has increased the carcino-
genicity of the compound (i.e.,  cocarcinogenic effects).

Fluorene
Acute Toxicity Summary
May be toxic by inhalation, ingestion, or dermal contact and
absorption.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Limited information available.
Cancer Potential
Data inadequate to determine carcinogenic effects [IARC
1983].
Other
No toxicity data are available for humans.

Lead
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute inorganic lead intoxication in humans is character-
ized by encephalopathy, abdominal pain, hemolysis, liver
damage, renal tubular necrosis, seizures, coma, and respi-
ratory arrest.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic low levels of exposure to lead can affect the
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TO SLM/3-90

-------
Table B-5,  Page  5 of 7
Lead   (Continued
hematopoietic system, the nervous system, and the car-
diovascular system. Lead inhibits several key enzymes in-
volved in heme biosyntheses. One characteristic effect of
chronic lead intoxication is anemia, by reduced hemoglobin
production and shortened erythrocyte survival. In humans,
lead exposure has resulted in nervous system injury includ-
ing reduced hand-eye coordination, reaction time, visual
motor performance, and nerve conduction velocity. The
developing child appears  especially sensitive to lead-in-
duced nervous  system injury. Lead can also affect the
immune system and produce gingival lead lines. Epidemi-
ological studies  have indicated that chronic lead exposure
may be associated with increased blood pressure in humans.
Exposure  to lead is associated with  sterility, abortion,
neonatal mortality, and morbidity. Organolead compounds
are neurotoxic.
Cancer Potential
Lead  salts have some evidence of carcinogenicity in ani-
mals.
Other
Children are especially sensitive to low level effects.

Manganese
Acute Toxicity  Summary
Acute inhalation exposures to very high concentrations can
cause manganese pneumonitis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic manganese poisoning results from inhalation of
high concentrations of manganese dust. Chronic manga-
nese  poisoning  is characterized by psychiatric symptoms,
such as irritability, difficulty in walking, speed disturbances
and compulsive behavior, and by encephalopathy and
progressive deterioration of the CMS.  Chronic effects of
manganese poisoning are similar to Parkinson's disease.
Liver changes are also frequently seen. Individuals with an
iron deficiency may be more susceptible to chronic poison-
ing.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Manganese is an essential nutrient. Manganese concen-
trations in water at 50 u.g/1 may exhibit undesirable taste
and discoloration.

Mercury
Acute Toxicity  Summary
Inhalation of mercury vapor can  cause  bronchitis and
nervous system effects. Oral exposure can result in ab-
dominal cramps, gastrointestinal effects, ulceration, shock,
circulatory collapse, and renal failure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Occupational exposure to inorganic mercury can produce
effects on nervous system, including tremors, erethism,
muscular  weakness, personality changes, gingivitis, and
colored eye reflex.  In children,  pink  disease has been
reported after ingestion of mercurous compounds. Expo-
sure  to organic mercury  can cause sensory  and visual
disturbances, tingling, paresthesiae,   numbness, tunnel
vision leading to blindness, visual, peripheral neuropathy,
weakness in extremities and progressive ataxia, tremor,
cerebral atrophy, degeneration of nerves, and death.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated
Other
Mercury is transferred transplacentally. Toxicity depends
on chemical form. Metallic, organic, and inorganic com-
pounds can be biotransformed.
GL068800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90
Naphthalene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Inhalation of vapor may cause eye irritation, headache, and
confusion. Ingestion may cause abdominal pain, nausea,
and vomiting. Skin or eye contact may lead to systemic
effects such  as bladder irritation,  kidney effects, and
nemoletic effects such as anemia and decreased hemoglo-
bin. In animal studies, bronchial necrosis was observed in
rats.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Occurrence of cataracts upon naphthalene vapor and dust
exposure has been observed in humans. Subchronic ani-
mal studies have shown that oral doses produced cata-
racts and degeneration of the retina. Dermatitis has been
reported with repeated skin exposure. Two studies have
reported  hemolytic  anemia in infants born to women
exposed during pregnancy.
Cancer Potential
Studies have not shown that naphthalene is carcinogenic.
Naphthalene is commonly found in coal tar and epidemiol-
ogical studies have shown coal tar to be carcinogenic. The
role of naphthalene alone could not be determined.
Other
Acute exposures to large  doses may cause hemolytic
effects (destruction of red blood cells). This effect is most
pronounced in individuals with a hereditary deficiency of
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Nickel
Acute Toxicity Summary
Signs of acute nickel toxicity may include headaches,
nausea, vomiting, chest pain, cough, hyperpnea, cyanosis,
gastrointestinal and CNS effects, weakness, fever, pneu-
monia, respiratory failure, cerebral edema, and death.
Acute exposures to nickel containing dust may result in
chemical pneumonitis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Rhinitis, nasal sinusitis, and nasal mucosal injury are among
the effects reported among workers chronically exposed
to various nickel compounds. Allergic contact dermatitis
and other dermatological effects are the most frequent
effects of dermal exposure to nickel and nickel-containing
compounds.
Cancer Potential
There is  extensive epidemiological evidence indicating
excess cancer of  the lung and nasal cavity for workers
exposed to certain nickel compounds. Nickel compounds
implicated as having carcinogenic potential include insol-
uble dusts of nickel subsulfide and nickel oxides, vapor of
nickel carbonyl and soluble sulfate, nickel carbonyl.
Other
May or may  not be an essential element.
Phenanthrene
Acute Toxicity Summary
An irritant through inhalation and ingestion exposure. May
also be dermally absorbed.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
May be an allergen.
Cancer Potential
Inadequate data forthe evaluation in experimental animals.
Other
Can cause photosensitization of the skin.

-------
Table B-5,  Page 6 of 7
Phenol
Acute Toxicity Summary
Corrosive to tissue. Severe eye damage and blindness may
result from direct eye contact. Skin contact may produce
whitening of skin, burn, or systemic poisoning. Paleness,
weakness, sweating, headaches, cyanosis, kidney dam-
age, and death may occur.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic phenol poisoning is rare.  It induces vomiting,
difficulty swallowing, diarrhea, lack of appetite, headaches,
fainting, dizziness,  and neural  disturbances.  Liver and
kidney  damage may occur.
Cancer Potential
Phenol may promote the effects of certain carcinogens.


Pyrene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Limited information is available.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Limited information is available.
Cancer Potential
Evidence suggests that pyrene is cocarcinogenic in labora-
tory animal experiments.


Poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposure of rats to technical mixtures at high doses
causes diarrhea, loss of appetite, and liver necrosis.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Cumulative toxic effects may follow continuous exposure
to low levels.  In animals the most notable effects are
alterations to the liver, including liver enlargement, fatty
infiltration, centrilobular neurosis, induction of metaboliz-
ing enzymes, and changes in porphyrin metabolism. Ef-
fects on  liver enzymes may alter  the toxicity of  other
chemicals. Adverse reproductive effects and fetotoxicity
have been observed in animals. Immunosuppressive ef-
fects have also been reported.
Cancer Potential
Rats fed  Aroclor 1260 exhibit an increased incidence of
neoplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinomas (liver
tumors), as well as proliferative  lesions in the liver.

Selenium
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposures can produce CMS effects, including nerv-
ousness, drowsiness, and convulsions, and eye and nasal
irritation.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic exposure to selenium-containing compounds by
inhalation can result in pallor, coated tongue, gastrointes-
tinal disorders, nervousness, garlic breath, liver and spleen
damage,  anemia,  and mucosal irritation. Discoloration,
decayed  teeth,  skin eruptions,  gastrointestinal distress,
and loss of hair and nails have been reported in humans
exposed orally. In livestock, excess  intake can cause blind
staggers—impaired vision,  weak limbs, respiratory fail-
ure—and alkali  disease—hair loss, sterility, atrophy of
hooves, lameness, and anemia. Embryotoxic and terato-
genic in animals.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in laboratory animals. May be anticarcinc-
genic and protective in humans.
Other
Essential. Toxicity related to chemical form.
Tetrachloroethene  (Perchloroeth-
ylene)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Tetrachloroethene can depress the CMS and cause narco-
sis. It is irritating to mucous membranes and skin and can
cause lung edema. Neurological effects on dry-cleaners
have been reported.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Chronic  exposure may result in pathological changes in
liver of laboratory animals. It may also affect the kidney. In
humans, inhalation exposure may produce irritation  of
respiratory tract, nausea, headache, sleeplessness, and
abdominal pains. Fatalities have been reported.
Cancer Potential
Carcinogenic in laboratory animals. An increased incidence
of cancers among dry-cleaning workers exposed to several
solvents has been described.
Toluene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Humans exposed  by inhalation experimentally, occupa-
tionally, or by intentional abuse may exhibit excitation, then
CMS depression and necrosis. Neurotoxic effects include
nausea, fatigue, and coordination at low levels and confu-
sion, ataxia, and weakness at higher levels. In rats, irritation
of mucous membranes  and incqordinatipn  have been
observed, as well as pulmonary irritation with subchronic
exposure.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
CNS effects have  been  reported in  workers,  such as
disturbances in memory and thinking, psychomotor skills,
visual accuracy, sensorimotor  speed, and performance
tests. Indications of cerebral and cerebellar dysfunction
include tremors, ataxia, and equilibrium disorders, bizarre
behavior, and emotional  lobility may occur. In cases of
abuse, changes in  liver and kidney function have been
observed.  In rats,  a decrease in  hematocrit has been
reported.
Cancer Potential
Embryotoxicity and possible teratogenicity in mice have
been reported in an abstract. In rats, skeletal retardation of
offspring has been described.
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Acute Toxicity Summary
Trichloroethane is a CNS depressant and may impair psy-
chophysiological functions. Human fatalities have been
reported following deliberate inhalation or occupational
exposures; lung congestion was found.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Exposure by inhalation can produce liver damage in mice
and affects drug metabolism in liver of rats.
Cancer Potential
Mutagenic in some in vitro tests.


Trichloroethene  (TCE)
Acute Toxicity Summary
Exposure to TCE can cause depression of the CNS, includ-
ing dizziness, headaches, ^coordination similar to that
induced by alcohol, nausea, vomiting, and unconscious-
ness.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Long-term inhalation exposure can affect liver and kidneys
GLO68800.Afl.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90

-------
Table B-5, Page 7 of 7

Trichloroethene (TCE)  (Continued)
in animals. In humans, changes in liver enzymes have been
associated with TCE exposure.
Cancer Potential
Exposure of mice (orally and by inhalation) and rats have
produced increases in liver or lung or kidney tumors.
Other
"Degreasers flush" has been described in TCE-exposed
workers who consume alcohol.

Vinyl Chloride
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute occupational exposure to high concentrations of
vinyl chloride can produce symptoms of narcosis in hu-
mans.  Respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, headache,
irritability, memory disturbances, and tingling sensations
may also occur. Deaths have been reported.  In animals,
ataxia, narcosis, blood clotting difficulties, congestion and
edema in lungs, and kidney and liver effects have been
demonstrated. At high doses excitement,  contractions,
convulsions, and an increase in respiration followed by
respiratory failure precede death.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Human health effects associated with chronic  occupa-
tional exposure to vinyl chloride  include hepatitis-like liver
changes, decreased blood platelets, enlarged spleens,
decreased pulmonary function, acroosteolyis (sometimes
with Raynaud-like syndrome), sclerotic syndrome, throm-
bocytopenia, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal  toxicity,
and disturbances in vision and in the CMS. In laboratory
animals,  liver  and kidney toxicity may  be severe and
histopathological changes in lung and spleen may also
occur with vinyl chloride exposure.
Cancer Potential
Vinyl chloride is a known human carcinogen causing liver
angiosarcomas (a very rare tumor in humans) and possibly
increasing incidence of tumors of the brain, lung, and
hemolymphopoietic system in humans. Vinyl chloride is
carcinogenic in mice, rats, and hamsters.
Other
Vinyl chloride is mutagenic in several test systems. Chro-
mosome aberrations have  been reported in exposed
workers. In humans, possible relationships between expo-
sure and birth defects and fetal death have been reported.
Possible increased fetal mortality among wives of occupa-
tionally exposed workers has been debated. Increased
skeletal variants were found in offspring of mice exposed
during gestation.

Xylene
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute exposures to inhaled xylene can depress the CNS
and irritate mucous membranes.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Changes in behavioral tests, manual coordination, balance,
and EEG patterns have been reported in humans exposed
to xylenes. Development of tolerance against some of
these effects has been described. Effects on  liver of rats
have been reported.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.

Zinc
Acute Toxicity Summary
Acute adverse effects of zinc include metal fume fever by
the inhalation of fumes. Fever, nausea, vomiting, stomach
cramps, diarrhea may result from acute ingestions.
Chronic Toxicity Summary
Prolonged ingestion of zinc can result in irritability, muscu-
lar stiffness and pain, loss of appetite, and nausea. High
levels of zinc  in diet may retard  growth and produce
defective mineralization of bone.
Cancer Potential
Not indicated.
Other
Essential nutrient. Taste threshold 15 ppm; 40 ppm soluble
zinc salts impart a metallic taste.
GLO68800.AR.PH Tox TW SLM/3-90

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
Two primary sources of critical toxicity values were used. The primary source is
the U.S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database
(U.S. EPA 1990).  IRIS is the EPA's repository of agencywide verified toxicity
values.  If a toxicity value was not available through IRIS, then the latest
available Quarterly Update of the Health Effects Summary Table (HEAST)
issued by the EPA's Office of Research and Development (U.S. EPA 1989e)
was used as a secondary source.  The slope factors for arsenic and
benzo[a]pyrene were taken from other U.S. EPA sources (U.S. EPA 1988b and
U.S. EPA 1980, respectively).

Reference Dose for Noncarcinogenic Effects

The toxicity value  describing the dose-response relationship for noncarcinogenic
effects is the reference dose (RfD).  The U.S. EPA RfD Work Group
(U.S. EPA 1989a) defines RfDs as follows:

      In general,  the RfD is an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an
      order of magnitude) of a daily exposure to the human population
      (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without  an  appreciable
      risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime.  The RfD is generally
      expressed in units of milligram per kilogram of body weight per day
      (mg/kg/day).

The RfDs used  in this assessment are presented in Table B-6. This assessment
uses the term RfD to describe all of the critical toxicity values for
noncarcinogenic effects.  Some of the RfDs listed in  the HEAST update have
also not yet undergone the agencywide verification process.
                                    B-8

-------
Page 1 of 3
                                                     REFERENCE DOSES
                                                    G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
ORAL ROUTE:
Acetone

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium
Benzoic acid
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

2-Butanone
Butyl benzyl phthalate


Cadmium
Carbon disulflde

Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform

Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
Cyanide


ODD
DDT
Di-n-biitylphthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Reference
Dose(RfD)
mg/kg/day

0.1

0.0004

0.001 e

0.05
4
0.005
0.02

0.05
0.2


0.0005
0.1

0.0007
0.02
0.01

1
0.005
0.037 f
0.02 g


-
0.0005
0.1
0.1
-
Source

IRIS

IRIS

HEAST

IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS

IRIS
HEAST


IRIS
IRIS

IRIS
HEAST
IRIS

IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS


-
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
-
(a)
Date

7-1-89

3-1-88

7-1-89

8-1-89
8-1-89
9-7-88
8-1-89

3-1-88
7-1-89


10-1-89
2-1-89

6-30-88
7-1-89
6-30-88

8-1-89
3-1-88
7-1-89
9-7-88


-
8-22-88
9-7-88
7-1-89
-
Critical Effect

Increased liver and kidney
weight and nephrotoxicity
Longevity, blood glucose,
and cholesterol
Keratosis and
hyperpigmentation
Increased blood pressure
Human daily per capita
No adverse effects
Increased relative liver
weight
Fetotoxicity in rats
Effects on body weight
gain, testes, liver,
kidney
Significant proteinuria
Fetal toxicity/
malformations
Liver lesions
Liver and kidney effects
Fatty cyst formation in
liver
No effects observed
No effects reported
-
Weight loss, thyroid
effects and myelin
degeneration
-
Liver lesions
Increased mortality
None
-
o>;
UF

1000

1000

-

100
1
100
1000

1000
100


10
100

1000
1000
1000

100
500
-
100


-
100
1000
1000
-
I (c) Confidence
MF inRfD

1 Low

1 Low

-

1 Medium
1 Medium
1 Low
1 Medium

1 Medium
-


1 High
1 Medium

1 Medium
-
1 Medium

10 Low
1 Low
-
5 Medium


-
1 Medium
1 Low
-
-
                                                                                                                       (d)

-------
Page 2 of 3
                                                                   Table B-6
                                                               REFERENCE DOSES
                                                              G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene

Diethyl phthalate


Dimethyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Methylene chloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)

2-Methylphenol

4-Methylphenol

Naphthalene

Nickel

Phenol

Pyrene
Selenium

Silver
1 , 1 ,2,2 Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Reference
Dose(RfD)
mg/kg/day
0.009
0.02

0.8


-
0.1
i
0.2
0.0003
0.06
0.05

0.05

0.05

0.4 e

0.02 h

0.6

-
0.003 e

0.003
-
0.01
(a)
Source
IRIS
IRIS

IRIS


-
IRIS
-
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS

IRIS

IRIS

HEAST

IRIS

IRIS

-
HEAST

IRIS
-
IRIS
Date
12-1-88
1-1-89

9-7-88


-
9-7-88
-
7-1-89
7-1-89
10-1-89
7-1-89

1-1-89

1-1-89

7-1-89

3-1-88

6-1-89

-
7-1-89

6-30-88
-
3-1-88
Critical Effect
Hepatic lesions
Increased serum alkaline
phosphatase in male mice
Decreased growth rate,
food consumption and
altered organ weights
-
Liver and kidney toxicity
-
CNS
CNS
Liver toxicity
Increased liver and kidney
weight and nephrotoxicity
Decreased body weights
and neurotoxicity
Decreased body weights
and neurotoxicity
Ocular and internal
lesions
Decreased body and organ
weights
Reduced fetal body weight
in rats
-
Hair and nail loss;
dermatitis
Argyria
-
Hepatotoxicity in mice,
(b)
UP
1000
1000

1000


-
1000
-
100
10
100
1000

1000

1000

100

100

100

-
15

2
-
1000
(c)
MF
1
1

1


-
1
-
-
-
I
1

1

1

-

3

1

-
-

1
-
1
Confidence
inRfD
Medium
Low

Low


-
Low
-
-
-
Medium
Low

Medium

Medium

-

Medium

Low

-
-

Medium
-
Medium
                                                                                                                                               (d)
Toluene
0.3
IRIS
9-7-8
 weight gain in rats
LDH levels
Clinical chemistry and
 hematological parameters
100
Medium

-------
Page 3 of 3
Zinc
                                                                     Table B-6
                                                                  REFERENCE DOSES
                                                                 G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
1,1,1-Trichloroethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vanadium
Xylenes
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg/day
0.09
,
0.004
-
0.007
2
(a)
Source
IRIS

IRIS
-
HEAST
IRIS
Date
6-1-89

9-26-88 i
-
7-1-89
7-1-89
Critical Effect
Slight growth retardation
in guinea pigs
Clinical serum chemistry
f
None observed
Hyperactivity, decreased
(b)
UF
1000

1000
-
100
100
(c)
MF
1

1
-
-
1
Confidence
in RfD
Medium

Medium
-
-
Medium
                                                                                                                                                    (d)
       0.2
HEAST
7-1-89
 body weight and increased
 mortality (males)
Anemia
10
INHALATION ROUTE:
2-Butanone
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene

Xylenes
      0.09
HEAST
      0.02        HEAST

  2 mg/m3      HEAST(v)

0.3 mg/m3      HEAST(v)
7-1-89
             7-1-89

             7-1-89

             7-1-89
                        CNS
                                1000
            Liver and kidney effects

            CNS effects, eye and nose
             irritation
            CNS effects, nose and
                                1000

                                 100
a. Sources of RfD:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989.
b. UF-Uncertainty Factor - Presented on IRIS or HEAST.
c. MF-Modifying Factor - Presented on IRIS or HEAST.
d. Confidence in RfD as presented on IRIS.
e. The oral RfD is being reconsidered by the RfD workgroup.
f. Based on proposed drinking water standard of 1.3 mg/1.
g. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
h. Nickel value based on nickel-soluble salts.
i. AIC for lead listed in the SPHEM (0.0014) withdrawn by EPA.

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

RfDs for some inorganic compounds are for specific forms (e.g., hexavalent and
trivalent chromium). The CLP analyses do not, however,  report concentrations
of specific forms, but rather give results in terms of total inorganic chemical. In
such situations, it was assumed that, unless otherwise known, the most toxic form
is present and its RfD  used.

Slope Factors for Carcinogenic Effects

The dose-response relationship for carcinogens is expressed as a carcinogenic
potency factor or slope factor that converts estimated intakes directly to
incremental lifetime  cancer risk. Slope factors are presented in units of the
inverse of milligrams of chemical per kilogram of body weight per day.  The
potency factors used in this assessment are summarized in Table B-4.

The data used for estimating the dose-response relationship are taken from
lifetime animal studies  or human occupational or epidemiological studies where
excess cancer risk has been associated with exposure to the chemical. In animal
studies,  it is assumed that if a carcinogenic response occur at the dose levels
used in  the study, then a response will occur at all lower doses.  For practical
reasons, low levels of risk cannot be measured directly,  either by animal
experiments or epidemiologic studies (U.S. EPA 1984a). Use of cancer potency
factors inherently assumes that cancer risk is probablistic and any degree of
exposure leads to some degree of risk.

The approach used by the U.S. EPA to estimate the carcinogenic potency factor
from animal studies  or  human  data assumes a dose-response relationship with no
threshold.  There is  uncertainty and conservatism built into EPA's risk
extrapolation approach.  EPA has  stated that cancer risks estimated by this
method produce estimates that "provides  a rough but plausible upper limit of
                                     B-9

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

risk," i.e., it is not likely that the true risk would be much more than the
estimated risk, but it could be considerably lower (U.S. EPA 1985a).

STANDARDS AND CRITERIA

The environmental standards and criteria for groundwater are defined in
Table B-7.  U.S. EPA drinking water standards and criteria for the potential
chemicals of concern are presented in Table B-8. Currently, there are no
federal or state  standards or criteria for soil.
                      EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT

This section identifies the means by which people can come into contact with
chemicals from the site.  It addresses exposures that may result under current
site conditions and from potential uses of the site and the surrounding areas in
the future.  This section also identifies the populations at risk,  the routes by
which the receptors may become exposed, and the magnitude,  frequency, and
duration of the exposures.

EXPOSURE SETTING

This 100-acre site borders on the southwest edge of an expanding urban area.
The current land use is mixed rural, residential, and industrial areas, as
illustrated in Figure B-l.  Residential areas are located just east and north of
the site.  Small businesses are located adjacent to the east side of the site. The
south side of the site includes a portion of the Utica-Rochester Recreational
Area.
                                   B-10

-------
                                         Table B-7
                 DEFINITIONS OF STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDEUNES
                                    G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                        (Page 1  of 2)


Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs):  MCLs are enforceable drinking water standards
established by U.S. EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act that represent the maximum permissible
level of a contaminant in water that is delivered to any user of a public water system. An MCL is
required to be set as close as feasible to the respective maximum contaminant limit goal (MCLG),
taking into consideration the best technology, treatment techniques, and other factors (including
costs). MCLs are listed at 40 CFR 141.61.


Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs):  MCLGs are nonenforceable drinking water health
goals set by U.S. EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act that are to represent a level presenting
"no known or anticipated adverse effects on the health of persons" while allowing for an adequate
margin of safety.  MCLGs were previously termed Recommended Maximum Contaminant Levels
(RMCLs).  MCLGs are listed at 40 CFR 141.50.


Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels: Secondary MCLs are nonenforceable goals for drinking
water established by U.S. EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act for contaminants that  by their
presence in excessive quantities may discourage the utilization of  a public water supply  because of
such qualities as taste, color, odor, and corrosivity.  Secondary MCLs are listed at 40 CFR 143.


Federal Water Quality Criteria (FWQC):  FWQC  are nonenforceable guidelines  developed by
U.S. EPA under the Clean Water Act that are used by the states to set water quality standards for
surface water. EPA develops two kinds of criteria, one for the protection of human health and
another for the protection of aquatic life.  FWQC quantitatively address  the levels of pollutants in
water which will ensure water quality adequate to support a specified use.  These criteria are based
solely on data and scientific judgments on the relationship between pollutant concentrations and
environmental and human health effects and do not reflect considerations of economic or
technological feasibility.

The purpose of FWQC for human health protection is to identify protective levels from two routes of
exposure-exposure from drinking the water and from consuming aquatic organisms, primarily fish.
There are criteria provided for exposure from both routes, and from fish consumption alone.  The
criteria identify concentrations equating to specified cancer risk levels (10"4, 10, and 10"') for
carcinogens or threshold-level concentrations for noncarcinogens that represent the water
concentrations that would  prevent adverse (chronic toxicity) health effects.  There are also non-
health-based criteria for chemicals with organoleptic properties (i.e., taste or odor) representing the
water concentration that would prevent taste or odor concerns.

The FWQC without modification are not appropriate for exposures through groundwater or other
situations where exposure is through drinking  water consumption  alone. The FWQC values can be
adjusted to  reflect only exposure from  drinking the water.  Adjusted FWQC are presented in the
Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual  (U.S. EPA 1986e).

-------
                                         Table B-7
                 DEFINITIONS OF STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                    G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                       (Page 2 of 2)


Office of Drinking Water Health Advisories: The health advisories are nonenforceable guidelines
that present the U.S. EPA Office of Water's most recent assessment of concentrations of
contaminants  in drinking water at which adverse effects (noncarcinogenic end points of toxicity)
would not be  anticipated to occur.  A margin of safety is included to protect sensitive members of
the population.  These values are subject to change as new health effects information becomes
available.  They are specified for 1-day,  10-day, longer term (90 days to 1 year), and lifetime
exposure periods. The lifetime health advisories are not developed for carcinogens.


GLT959/014.50

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                                          Table B-8
                                   U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                           FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN G & H LANDFILL SITE
All units ug/1 except as noted
                                                                                                                                (e)
(•) (b) (c)
Maximum Contuninuit Maximum Contunimuit Scconduy Miximum
Level (MCL) Level Goal (MCLO) Contaminant Level (SMCL)
Chemical
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
bis(2-chloromethyl) ether
bis(2-chlorocthyl) ether
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
2-Butanone
Chlorobenzene (mono)
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
1,2-Dichloroetnane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethcne
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Iron
Lead
Mangenese
Mercury
Mcthylene chloride
4-Methylphenol
Nickel
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
PCB
Phenol
Selenium
Styrene
Tetrachloroelhene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes (total)
Zinc
Final
.
50
1000
5
-
-
-
-
-
50
-
-
5
7
-
-
-
50
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
5
2
-
-
Proposed
.
-
5000
-
-
-
-
-
100
100
1300
-
-
-
700
-
-
5
-
2
-
-
-
-
0.5
-
50
5/100 f
5
2000
-
-
10000
-
Final
.
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
0
-
-
Proposed Final Proposed
SO
-
5000 - -
-
-
-
-
.
100 - -
100
1300 1000
h
-
-
700 - 30
- - -
300
20
50
2
- - -
- - -
-
-
0 - -
.
50
0/100 g - 10
0 - -
2000 - 40
_
-
10000 - 20
5000
(d)
Federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria
Toxicity
Protection
.
-
-
-
-
-
21000
-
488
-
-
200
-
-
2400
188
-
50
-
10
-
-
15.4
-
-
3500
10
-
-
15000
-
-
-
5000
10-6 Orgmoleptic
Cancer Risk Criterion
.
0.0025
-
0.67
0.0000039
0.03
-
-
-
-
1000
-
0.94
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.1
-
4.9
0.013
-
-
-
0.88
-
2.8
2
-
-
Office of
Drinking Water
Lifetime Health
Advisories
.
50
1500
NRC
-
-
-
170
300
120
-
154
NRC
7
3400
-
-
20
-
1.1
NRC
-
150
-
-
-
-
140
10
2420
NRC
NRC
400
-

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                                                              Table B-8
                                               U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                                          FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN G & H LANDFILL SITE
(a)  MCLs are listed at 40 CFR.61 for organic contaminants and 40 CFR 141.62 for inorganic contaminants. Proposed MCLs issued on May 22, 1989 (54 FR 22062) except lead and
    copper which were issued August 24, 1988 (53 FR 322S9).

(b)  MCLOa are listed at 40 CFR 141.50 for organic chemicals and 40 CFR 141.51 for inorganic chemicals. Proposed MCLOs issued on May 22, 1989 (54 FR 22062) except lead and
    copper which were issued August 24, 1988 (53 FR 32259).

(c)  They are listed at 40 CFR 143.  Proposed SMCLs issued on May 22, 1989 (54 FR 22062).

(d)  Federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria (FAWQC). The toxicity protection criteria for noocarcinogenic effects presents concentrations which are not expected to produce adverse
    effects in humans.  Organoleplic effects are taste and odor problems and are not health based.  Published in the "Supcrfund Public Health Evaluation Manual" (U.S. EPA 1986).

(e)  A "NRC" is indicated where health advisories have been issued for the chemical for less than lifetime exposures.

(0  EPA proposes MCLs of 100 ug/1 based on a Group C carcinogen classification and 5 ug/l based on a B2 classification.

(g)  EPA proposes MCLOs of 100 ug/l based on a Group C carcinogen classification and 0 ug/l based on a B2 classification.

(h)  Non-corrosive.

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

The site is located on terrain ranging from flat to gently rolling, with mixed
vegetation. Some areas are forested with mature trees and thick underbrush;
other areas are sparsely vegetated.  The site was completely fenced in 1987.
The Clinton River is immediately west of the Phase III Landfill and about
l/2 mile south of the site, near Ryan Road.  The  Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal runs
adjacent to the south side of the site.  The  depth to the upper aquifer is
approximately 25 feet.

The climate in this area varies seasonally.  Annual rainfall is approximately
30 inches  (NOAA 1982).  On the average, there are 90 days where temperatures
are below 32° F.  The wind direction is generally from the southwest during
most of the year and may also be from the west during the months
January through May and October (National Weather Service, Detroit
Metropolitan Airport).

There are approximately 25 private residential and industrial wells east  and
north of the site (Figure B-2).  Some residences  that previously used
groundwater for water supply have been connected to the municipal water
system.  There is no restriction, however, preventing residents from using existing
or installing new wells.  Businesses located adjacent to the east portion of the
site also have private wells, although they have been connected to the municipal
water supply also.  The wells are reported to be used for nonpotable purposes.

EXPOSURE  PATHWAY ANALYSIS

An exposure pathway is the means by which a chemical moves from a source to
a receptor.  A complete exposure pathway has five elements (Figure B-3):

       •      A chemical source
                                    B-ll

-------
CO

D
o
_>
o
                                                                                                                                                                  North
                                                                                                                                                                   LANDFILL BOUNDARY

                                                                                                                                                                   U.S. EPA SITE FENCE

                                                                                                                                                                   GATE

                                                                                                                                                                   DITCH. STREAM, OR
                                                                                                                                                                   RIVER
                                                                                                                                                              ~:   TRAIL
                                                                                                                                                               APPROXIMATE
                                                                                                                                                               SCALE IN FEET
                                                                                                PHASE I LANDFILL
                                                 PHASE II LANDFILL
                                          •••••^••••••••••••••-
                                                         	

                                                         Rochester - Utica Recreational Area
                                                                                                                           22 - MILE ROAD
RAILROAD GRADE
(TRACKS REMOVED)
                                                                                                                                                      NOTE: LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.

                                                                                                                                                                     FIGURE B-1
                                                                                                                                                                     LAND USE MAP
                                                                                                                                                                     G & H LANDFILL Rl

-------
GLO65561.RI RES WELLS&MUNIP WTR 3-8-90
                 OIL PONDS & SOLVENT
                 DISPOSAL AREA
0    	    500
^•i
 SCALE IN FEET


 LEGEND

   l;i  RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
  /Q\ RESIDENTIAL WELL ON
  v!i!> MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY

   ;;*;  RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING LOCATION
                                                                  FIGURE B-2
                                                                  RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                                                                  AND WELLS ON MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM
                                                                  G&H LANDFILLRl

-------
            SOURCE
         Buried Wastes
               RELEASE
             MECHANISM
<
                                       I
                                     Rainfall -
                                    Percolation
                                     into Soil
                                      Water
                                    Leaches Out
                                   Contaminants
                                       1
                                     Leachate
                                     Mixes with
                                    Groundwater
             TRANSPORT
                 MEDIUM
                                     Transport
                                      through
                                    Groundwater
                                      to River
             EXPOSURE
                  POINT
                                       I
          Offsite Wells
A
A
              ROUTE OF
             EXPOSURE
                                       i
            Ingestion
              of
           Groundwater
                                                        FIGURE B-3
                                                        ELEMENTS OF A COMPLEtP
                                                        EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
                                                        G&HLANDFILLRI

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

      •      A mechanism for chemical release
      •      An environmental transport medium
      •      An exposure point (receptor location)
      •      A feasible route  of exposure

Exposure may occur when chemicals migrate from the site to  an exposure point
(i.e., a location where receptors can come into  contact with the  chemicals) or
when a receptor comes into direct contact with waste or contaminated media at
the site.  An exposure pathway is complete (i.e., there is an exposure) if there  is
a way for the receptor to take in chemicals through ingestion, inhalation,  or
dermal absorption of contaminated waste or media.

Based on the analysis of the nature and extent of contamination in Chapter 3,
potential chemical migration discussed in Chapter 4, and a review of the site
setting, potential exposure pathways for the G&H Landfill site were identified
and evaluated for feasibility.  These potential exposure pathways are illustrated
in Figure B-4. The analysis of the pathways is summarized in Table B-9. The
following exposure pathways were evaluated as the most feasible exposure
pathways for the G&H site:

      •      Exposure of site visitors by direct contact (dermal  absorption and
             incidental ingestion) with contaminated surface soils, sediment, and
             oil seeps

      •      Exposure of site visitors resulting from the inhalation of chemicals
             and the oil seeps that have volatilized from buried waste material
                                    B-12

-------
                   GL065661.RI POT EXP PATH 1 3-14-90
     SOURCE
                        RELEASE
                       MECHANISM
TRANSPORT
MECHANISM
EXPOSURE
 POINT
EXPOSURE
 MEDIA
EXPOSURE
 ROUTE
PRIMARY
RECEPTOR
SECONDARY
 RECEPTOR
| SUBSURFACE SOIL/
  BURIED WASTE
Leaching / w Group
oesorption ^ H
1
dwater
ow
r
Discharge To
Surface water

>.
•
>,




Clinton River/Canal •
^-
r>
r>
•>
L>
Groundwater/
Drinking Water

Surface Water

Surface Water

Surface Water
w
>.
1
>,
'
Ingestlon, Dermal
Absorption, Inhalation
(Volatiles)

Ingestlon,
Bloaccumulatlon,
Bloconcentratlon

Ingestion

Ingestlon,
Dermal Absorption

^
>.

>,
Offslte Well Users

Aquatic Organisms




People Playing, Or
Swimming In
Surface Water Bodv
-f






















w


^






r>



>.


k
*












Sediments










>,



>,
•





	 >













Ingestlon,
Dermal Absorption




Ingestlon,
Bloaccumulation,
Bloconcentratlon


. ,


Ingestion,
Dermal Absorption

>.



>,






— >



>.


w






People Pl^ina, Or
Qurfarfl Water ftnrfu





Aquatic Organisms





People Playing, Or
Swimming In
Surface Water Body






















>,








>,


-^


w




*
People Consuming
Wildlife From Site






_ . _ . _. .

Caught From Water Body
Wlldlifft Pnncumlnn Fkh


1
People Consuming
Widlife From Site



                                                                                                                 FIGURE B-4 (Sheet 1 of 2)
                                                                                                                 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
                                                                                                                 G & H LANDFILL Rl

-------
GLO65561.RI  POTEXPPATH2 3-14-90
SOURCE








SURFACE SOILS









Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllll
SEDIMENTS

OIL SEEP AREA
Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllll













L
I


















RREASE TRANSPORT EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE
MECHANISM MECHANISM POINT MEDIA ROUTE


*. 1 I 1 -IT Wi llr! -"
-f" Volatilisation ^ Wind



r> Onslte 	 > Air (Dust) 	 *\ Inhalation | —
w Wind-Driven w, .., a \ 	 - 	 1
•* Erosion > ma , 	 ,
>-> Otfslte | 	 > Air (Dust) 	 ^ Inhalation | —

v Direct Contact With Soil v n . k -,,,tiM-nii V lnQesUon
	 * (No Release and Transport) *" Onslte *• >>urtace ooll f- Demla] Absorption



,-* ««Himont 	 k. Ingesflon, Dermal
-* Sediment * "Absorption

Onslte Ponds
v. nil C0on
w Direct Contact With Sediment w vu^ani , . .
~ (No Release and Transport) ~ Otfslte Ditches ^j Sediment | 	 ^| ingestion —
Canal


w. on seeo Water 	 fe mgestion. uermai
•^ on beep water »• Absorption

PRIMARY
RECEPTOR
.-.^1 ^itn Vkltnrc
1


^ Nearby Residents.
Nearby Businesses

->| Site Visitors
, Nearby Residents,
~* Nearby Businesses

|-> Site Visitors
L>| Terrestrial Wildlife








^^ ,._,.„,







SECONDARY
RECEPTOR











1 	 w People Consuming
~ WiMlifo Frnm "Jlto








w People Consuming
*" Wildlife From Site






                                                                              FIGURE B-4 (Sheet 2 of 2)
                                                                              POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
                                                                              G & H LANDFILL Rl

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                                                            Table B-9
                                                               ANALYSIS OF EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
                                                                     O&H LANDFILL SITE
Source Release Mechanism Transport Medium Exposure Point Potential Receptors
Surface Soil Volatilization Air Onsite Site visitors
and dust release
Offsite - bouses Residents
Offsite - businesses Workers
Direct contact
Surface soils Receptor contacts Onsite Site visitors
Runoff Runoff Clinton River
Clinton* Recreational Users
Kalamazoo Canal
Subsurface Soil Volatilization Air Onsite Site visitors
and
Buried Waste
Offsite - bouses Residents
Offsite - businesses Workers
Leaching & Oroundwater Onsite Onsite. well users
desorption
Offsite Existing
groundwatcr users
Offsite Future
groundwater users
Exposure Route
Inhalation
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Inhalation
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal absorption
Inhalation
Retain ? Rationale
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
No Surface soil has limited contamination.
Surface represents final landfill cover.
Yes Substantial amounts of volatiles
detected in test pits and soil
borings. Site access unrestricted.
Yes Substantial amounts of volatiles
detected in test pits and soil
borings. Residences and businesses
located nearby.
No No current onsite groundwater use.
Site development is not feasible
due to landfill characteristics.
Oroundwater currently used as a
Yes potable water source. Contaminants
detected in groundwater.
No restrictions on groundwater use.
Yes Population increasing in areas
adjacent to site.

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                                                              Table B-9
                                                                 ANALYSIS OF EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
                                                                        O & H LANDFILL SITE
Source Release Mechanism Transport Medium Exposure Point Potential Recepton Exposure Route
Leaching & Oroundwater Clinton River Recreational users Accidental
desorption discharge to Clinton- ingestion
surface water Kalamazoo Canal Dermal absorption
People who consume
contaminated fish. Ingestion
Buried Waste Leaching Leachate Oil Seep Area Site visitors Ingestion
Dermal absorption
People who consume Ingestion
contaminated wildlife.
Onsite Direct contact with onsite sediments Onsite Site visitors Ingestion
Sediments in place Dermal absorption
Retain ? Rationale
No evidence of release of
Yes contaminated groundwater to river/
canal although river and canal are
local discharge points.
People have access to the Clinton
Yes River and fish. Contaminants
detected in the river can not be
attributed to the site.
Yes No restrictions on site access.
Contaminants detected in leachate.
People known to hunt onsite.
Yes Contaminants have been detected in
organisms trapped in areas adjacent
to site, but contaminants can not be
attributed to the site.
Yes No restrictions on site access.
Contaminants detected in onsite
                                                                                                                                    sediments.

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

      •      Exposure of offsite residential and industrial groundwater users to
             chemical in groundwater through the ingestion, dermal absorption,
             and inhalation routes of exposure

      •      Exposure of people engaged in activities along the Clinton River
             and Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal by direct contact with surface water
             and sediments, if chemicals are released to these water bodies

      •      Exposure of offsite receptors resulting from the inhalation of
             chemicals that have volatilized from buried waste material and
             been transported offsite by the  wind

      •      Exposure of people who consume fish and terrestrial wildlife
             caught in the vicinity of the site, if chemicals are released from
             that site

Site Visitor Exposures

People who gain access to the G&H Landfill site could come into contact with
contaminated media.  The frequency, duration, extent,  and route of exposure
would depend upon the particular activity of the receptor and location onsite of
the activity.

The site  is currently bordered by a chain-link fence but it only limits, and does
not prohibit,  site entry.  In addition,  under the assumption of no action, this
fence and the fence surrounding the Oil Seep Area may not be assumed  to be
maintained in the future.  Access to  the site  may also be gained by walking
along the Clinton-Kalamazoo  Canal (Williams, pers. comm.)
                                    B-13

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Residential communities are adjacent to the site north of 23 Mile Road and east
of Ryan Road. These communities could be one  source of visitors  to the site.
There are businesses east of the site.  It is  possible, although unlikely, that
people working in these businesses may also enter the site.  The Utica-
Rochester Recreational Area is adjacent to the site to the south.  People from
outside the adjacent residential communities could come to the vicinity of the
site because of this recreational area.

Observations made during the site investigations indicated that people have
come onto the site. The  site has been known  to  be a play area for children
(Johnson, pers. comm.). Teenagers and adults may come onto the  site  to hunt
or hike.

Surface Soil.  Most of the site is covered with fill and vegetation that limits
direct contact with the site surface.  Chemicals have been detected  in some of
the exposed surface soil in samples collected in the Phase I  landfill. Site visitors
could come into direct contact with contaminated soil in these exposed  areas.
Direct contact with contaminated surface soil could result in exposure through
incidental ingestion and dermal absorption of chemicals.

Wind can release  contaminated soil into the air as dust.  This is not a major
release pathway for this site because  of the limited surface contamination and
cover such as vegetation and fill; thus, it will not be addressed in this
assessment.

Onsite Sediments.  Exposure to chemicals in sediments  could occur if site
visitors come  in direct contact with the sediments. The areas of the site where
contact with sediment could occur include the  Oil Seep  Area, onsite drainage
ponds, and ditches along  the site access road, and sediments in the Clinton-
                                     B-14

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Kalamazoo Canal.  Chemicals have been detected in these areas and are
accessible to  site visitors.  Site visitors may also come in contact with sediment
in the drainage ditches along Ryan Road.

Oil Seeps. Oil seeps are  collected in a series of ponds south of the Phase I
landfill.  These ponds contain contaminated sediment, water, and oil.  Although
the area is fenced,  access is possible if individuals break the  fence or the fence
is not maintained.

Site visitors in this  area may come into direct contact with the contaminated
media  in the ponds.  The terrain is steeply sloped.  It is possible that individuals
walking in the area could stumble and fall into the oil seep ponds.

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in the pond water and
sediment (i.e., chlorinated VOCs and aromatic VOCs).  People walking in the
area of the ponds could inhale VOCs released to the ambient air.  Odors were
observed in this section during the site investigation.  On occasion, air
monitoring performed for personal protection during RI activities did register
VOC concentration above background.

Subsurface Wastes. VOCs were detected in the subsurface soil of the Phase I
landfill during test  pitting operations.  These chemicals could be released to the
ambient air as a result of volatilization and diffusion.  Site visitors could inhale
VOCs released to the ambient air.

Offsite Receptors

People living in the residences adjacent to the site and people working at
business east of the site could be exposed if contaminants migrate from the  site.
                                     B-15

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

The potential migration and subsequent potential exposures are described in the
following sections.

Groundwater Users.  Human exposure to chemicals in groundwater could occur
if the groundwater is used as a drinking water supply.  The main route of
exposure in a residential setting would be through ingestion of water through
drinking and cooking. Dermal absorption could occur during  showering or
bathing.  Inhalation exposure may occur  if volatiles are released from the water
during routine household uses such as cooking, bathing, or showering.  Industrial
use of contaminated groundwater could result in exposure through the dermal
absorption and inhalation routes.

Chemicals have been detected in industrial and  residential wells east of the site.
In addition, chemicals have been detected in groundwater monitoring wells
located on and surrounding the  G&H site.  These chemicals have all been
detected in the shallow aquifer.  The actual number of households using
groundwater as their drinking water source is unknown.  It is  estimated that
25 households may be using groundwater, but this number may vary as many are
awaiting hookup to the municipal water system. The rest of the  population in
this area uses the municipal water supply.  It is anticipated  that future residents
in this area will connect to the municipal water supply, although no groundwater
restrictions are in place.

Chemicals have also been detected in the private wells of small businesses
located adjacent to the site. Exposure to chemicals may occur to employees that
work at these facilities.  These wells are not used  by the employees  as  a
drinking water source but mainly used for showering and washing equipment.

Airborne Exposures. As discussed  in the preceding  section, chemicals may be
                                   B-16

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

released from the site to the ambient air through volatilization.  They may be
carried offsite by the wind.  Residences and businesses are within V* mile to the
site.   Exposure could occur if residents or people at the local businesses inhale
the volatile compounds that are released.

Recreational  Users of the Clinton River
and Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal

The Clinton River or the Kalamazoo Canal may be discharge points for
groundwater  from the site.  Runoff from the site  also may drain into these water
bodies.  Human exposure to chemicals in surface water and  sediment  may occur
during swimming or other water related recreational activities at these water
bodies.

In previous site investigations, chemicals have been detected in  the surface water
and sediments of the Clinton River.  However, because of the presence of
another NPL site in the  area and other industries, the contamination cannot be
definitively associated with the G&H site.   Portions of the Clinton River flow
through the Utica-Rochester Recreation Area.  Park users have access to the
river and its  sediments when fishing, boating, and swimming.

If chemicals are released to these water bodies, exposure could occur through
dermal absorption and incidental ingestion  of chemicals in water. Exposure may
also occur through direct contact with contaminated sediments.

Consumers of Fish and Wildlife

Exposure to  chemicals from the site may occur if chemicals  are released from
the site to the  Clinton River and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal, the fish in  these
                                    B-17

-------
                                                AGENCY REVEW DRAFT

waters become contaminated with chemicals through bioconcentration and
bioaccumulation of the chemicals, and people consume the fish.  Past studies
conducted by the Michigan DNR have detected chemicals in fish from Clinton
River, although they are not directly attributable to the site.

Human exposure may also occur if terrestrial wildlife become contaminated with
chemicals from the site and people  consume the terrestrial wildlife.  Hunting is
thought to occur on the site or in the adjacent recreation area.  Past studies by
the DNR and CH2M HILL have detected chemicals in wildlife that were
trapped in the G&H study area.  Although some of the chemicals detected are
similar to chemicals detected at the site, their presence in the animals  collected
is not directly attributable to the site.

Pathways Not Addressed

Some of the pathways identified as  potential pathways of concern were not
addressed further in this assessment.  These pathways include onsite well users,
future residential development, direct contract with surface soil,  and inhalation of
contaminated dust released from surface soil.

Commercial or residential development of this property could result in exposures
of future site occupants if site development  exposed buried waste or if
groundwater were used  for a water supply.  However, future development  of the
G&H site, especially in  the area of the Phase  I Landfill, was not considered
feasible. Geotechnical and safety considerations such as subsidence and
concerns about buildings serving to  trap methane released  from  the landfill make
the development of the site unlikely.
                                    B-18

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Currently, there are no wells onsite used as a potable water source. Because of
the limitation of residential development, future groundwater users onsite would
not be a consideration. However, concentrations of contaminants detected in
monitoring wells were  used to estimate risks to potential offsite groundwater
users because of offsite contaminant migration in groundwater.

Direct contact exposure with onsite surface  soils in other locations besides the
Phase  I Landfill were not addressed.  Many of the other areas of the site are
covered with fill and vegetation that limits the potential for direct contact.
However, surface soil data are only available for some areas of the site. A
review of the data indicated that  concentrations detected in samples collected
offsite  were higher  than those detected onsite. For similar reasons, inhalation of
contaminated dust released from  the surface soil and potential exposure to site
visitors and offsite residents and visitors was not addressed. The presence of a
cover and vegetation would limit  dust release from the surface soil.

QUANTIFICATION OF EXPOSURE

Exposure is defined as the contact of an organism with a chemical or physical
agent.  In this assessment, exposure (or intake) is  normalized  for time and body
weight and is expressed as mg of chemical/kg of body weight/day (mg/kg/day).
The following factors are  used to estimate intake,  exposure frequency, exposure
duration, contact rate, exposure point concentrations, and body weight.  This
section summarizes the exposure  factors used in this assessment.  The
methodologies for calculating  chemical intakes for exposure estimation are
presented in Appendix C.

Recent EPA guidance states that actions at Superfund sites should be based on
an estimate of  the  "reasonable maximum exposure" expected to occur under
                                    B-19

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

both current and future land use conditions.  The reasonable maximum exposure
is defined as the "highest exposure that is reasonably expected to occur at a
site" (U.S. EPA 1989).  The intent of the reasonable maximum exposure is to
estimate a conservative  exposure case (i.e., well above the average case) that is
still within the range of possibilities.  Each exposure factor has a range of
possible values.  To the extent possible, this assessment has selected values for
the exposure factors that result in an estimate  of the reasonable maximum
exposure.

Based on the analysis of exposure pathways presented earlier in this section, the
exposure pathways were chosen to be were evaluated to determine potential
risks.  A summary of the exposure routes to be evaluated are presented in
Table  B-10. Some exposure pathways could not be quantitatively evaluated in
the assessment because of inadequate data or information.  These pathways will
be addressed in terms of qualitative risks in the Risk Characterization section  of
this assessment.

Site Visitor Exposures

The following  exposures are estimated to evaluate the potential exposures
associated with access to the site by people:

       •     Direct  contact (i.e., dermal absorption and ingestion) with surface
             soil

       •     Direct  contact with sediments

       •     Direct  contact with oil seeps
                                     B-20

-------
                                                    Table B-10
                                         EXPOSURE PATHWAYS ADDRESSED
                                                G & H LANDFILL SITE
Receptor/Location
                                           Media
                  Exposure Route
                           Quantitative
                            Assessment
 Qualitative
Assessment
Site Visitor/Onsite
 Surface Soil
         Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
                                                    X
                                 Oil Seep Sediment
                             Onsite Pond Sediment
                             Offsite Ditch Sediment
                                   Canal Sediment
                                   Oil Seep Water
                        Ingestion
                Dermal Absorption

                        Ingestion
                Dermal Absorption

                        Ingestion
                Dermal Absorption

                        Ingestion
                Dermal Absorption

                        Ingestion
                Dermal Absorption
                        Inhalation
                                    X
                                    X
                                                                                                              X
                                                                                                              X
                                                                                                              X
                                      Ambient Air
                                (Volatilization from
                                  Subsurface Soil)
                        Inhalation
                                    X
Resident/Off site
Groundwater             Ingestion
                Dermal Absorption
                        Inhalation
                                    X
                                    X
                                      Ambient Air
                                (Volatilization from
                                  Subsurface Soil)
                        Inhalation
                                    X
Recreation Users/
Clinton River;
Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal


Wildlife-Fish Consumers/
Onsite and Offsite

Surface Water


Sediment

Wildlife

Fish
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption

Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Ingestion

Ingestion
X
X

X
X
X

X

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

      •      Inhalation of volatile organics released from buried wastes and oil
             seeps

The exposure factors used in this assessment to describe these exposures are
given  in Table B-ll. They were selected to describe reasonable maximum
exposure situations.

Exposure Frequency and Duration.  Exposure of site visitors would be
intermittent.  Visitors would not be expected to come on the site daily.
Currently, no standard  exposure assumptions have been formulated by U.S. EPA
to describe this type of exposure.  Frequency and duration of exposure depend
upon  such factors as site access, proximity of site to residential communities or
populations, attractiveness of the site, and climate.  Surface soil and sediment
contamination are limited to discreet areas of the site; consequently, the site
visitor may not come into direct contact with contaminants during every site visit.

The actual frequency and duration of contact with contaminated media can not
be precisely estimated.  For the purpose of this assessment, several conservative
assumptions were made to describe potential contact with various  exposure
media.

Contact with contaminated surface soil and  sediment was assumed to occur
25 times per year for 5 years.  Inhalation of airborne contaminants was assumed
to occur 25 times per year for 5 years with  each site visit lasting approximately 8
hours. Contact with oil seeps (water) could be caused by accidental exposure or
contact  (i.e., someone falling into the ponds resulting in  full body contact)  and
would be limited to a one time exposure. Each of these exposure situations  is
intended to describe a reasonable  maximum exposure to a site visitor.
                                    B-21

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                     Table B-11
                             EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
                               G & H LANDFILL SITE
           Exposure Factor
Value
Source
Site Visitor - Soil and Sediment:
Body Weight (average)
Body Weight (child)
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Soil ingestion rate
Site Visitor - Oil Seep Water:
Body Weight (average)
Body Weight (child)
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Water ingestion rate
Water dermal absorption rate
Percent submersed
Duration in water
Site Visitor - Ambient Air:
Body Weight (average)
Hours exposed per day
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Inhalation rate
Offsite Groundwater Use Exposure:
Body Weight (average)
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Water ingestion rate
Water dermal absorption rate
Percent submersed
Bath duration

70-kg
35-kg
25 days
5 years
70 years
0.1 g/day

70-kg
35-kg
1 day
1 year
70 years
0.05 L/day
0.0008 cm/hr
75
10 minutes

70-kg
8 hours
25 days
5 years
70 years
1.4 m3/hour

70-kg
365 days
70 years
70 years
2 liters/day
0.5
75
15 minutes

U.S. EPA 1989
ICRP 1976
a
a
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989

U.S. EPA 1989
ICRP 1976
a
a
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
a
a

U.S. EPA 1989
a
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989

U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                     Table B-ll
                             EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
                               G & H LANDFILL SITE
           Exposure Factor
NOTE:
   a. Based on site-specific estimate.
Value
Source
Inhalation Offsite Resident:
Body Weight (average)
Hours exposed per day
Number days/year exposed
Number years exposed
Years in lifetime
Inhalation rate

70-kg
24 hours
365 days
70 years
70 years
20 m3/day

U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989
U.S. EPA 1989

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Route-Specific Exposure Factors.  Table B-ll summarizes the route-specific
exposure factors used to describe exposures to site visitors. Soil and sediment
ingestion rates of 0.1 gram/day are based on current U.S. EPA  guidance
(U.S. EPA I989b).  It was conservatively (in a health-protective sense) assumed
that  the absorption of chemicals bound to soil and sediment is not limited by the
soil/sediment matrix.

Several key assumptions arise concerning dermal absorption of contaminants
from water after an accidental fall into an oil seep pond.  It was assumed that,
an individual was to be 75 percent submerged and that, because of wet clothing,
exposure would have a duration of approximately 10 minutes.  Because there
are limited data supporting chemical-specific permeability contents, it was
assumed  that chemicals would be dermally absorbed from the water at the same
rate  as water (U.S. EPA 1989).

The  inhalation rates used  approximated an adult male  engaged in light activities
breathing at a rate of 1.4  m3/hr.  (U.S. EPA 1989c).

Exposure Point Concentrations.   The surface soil concentrations used were  the
highest detected concentrations for PCBs and PNAs detected in the surface soil
of the  Phase I landfill (Table B-12).  These concentrations are  from the
Phase  II Remedial Investigation sample results.  Highest concentrations were
used due to limited surface soil data available for the site as well as the sparse
distribution of contaminants detected.

Sediment samples were grouped into four separate areas that best illustrate the
distribution of detected contaminants.  These areas and sample numbers are
described below.
                                    B-22

-------
                                                 Table B-12 (Page 1 of 3)
                               SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SURFACE SOIL,
                                          SURFACE WATER, AND SEDIMENTS
 Media:
Location

Sediments:
Offsite
Drainage
Ditches
       Chemical

Aluminum
Arsenic
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Barium
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo[g,h,i]pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
Cadmium
Chloroform
Chromium
Chyrsene
Copper
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
DDT
Di-n-butylphthalate
Indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Pyrene
Selenium
Toluene
Vanadium
Zinc

Number of
Detections
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
4
5
3
1
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
5
5
3
5
5
1
3
5
5

Detection
Frequency %
100
100
100
100
100
100
60
100
80
100
60
20
100
100
100
40
40
10
80
100
100
50
100
100
20
60
100
100
Arithmetic
Mean
Concentration
(ug/lV
6,274
5.78
264
262.8
68
522.8
1.3
742
268.8
109.4
2.2
2.7
31
315.6
53
164
20
137.2
182
183.9
507.8
0.2
26.1
457.6
2.7
40.8
19.9
160.6


S.D.
2,668.4
3.3
262.3
241.8
64.5
504.7
1.0
555.4
189.7
78.7
0.8
0.8
20.8
293.9
34.5
25.6
15.9
56.5
107.4
182.6
205.4
0.1
11.8
423.1
0.5
52.6
7.9
122.8

95%
UCL
8,612.9
8.7
493.9
474.8
124.5
965.2
2.2
1,228.8
435.1
178.4
2.9
3.5
49.2
573.2
83.3
186.4
33.9
186.7
276.1
344
687.8
0.2
36.3
828.4
3.2
86.9
26.8
268.2
Range of
Concentrations
fue/H
2,960-10,900
2.1-11.9
55-730
61-640
32.9-195
84-1,300
0.23-0.61
180-1,700
47-570
39-220
1.2-3
1-5
7.6-68.1
66-750
11-111
120-150
23-50
68-185
47-320
47.7-536
181-778
0.1-0.31
7.3-40.3
88-1,000
1.9-5
8-140
9.3-33.1
27.4-372

-------
                                                     Table B-12 (Page 2 of 3)
 Media:
Location

Sediments:
Onsite
Ponds Area
Sediments:
Oil Seep
Area
Oil Seep
Water
        Chemical

Arochlor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzene
Benzoic Acid
Phenol
Pyrene
Toluene

Arochlor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzene
Butylbenzlphthalate
Ethyl Benzene
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naphthalene
Phenol
Toluene
Xylene

Arochlor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
Toluene
Xylene


Number of
Detections
2
3
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
3


Detection
Frequency %
40
60
20
47
20
20
60
100
66
100
66
100
66
66
66
100
100
50
33
50
33
50
Arithmetic
Mean
Concentration
Cue/lV
378.8
294.2
5.6
1,907
366.2
276.2
8.6
31,100
64,000
2,566.6
11,000
12,000
15,000
7,333.3
9,333.3
1,166.6
127,333.3
243,166.7
627,500
180,666.7
1,200
2,983.3



S.D.
309.3
247.9
1.9
1,478.8
117.3
92.7
7.7
30,542.1
53,839.3
1,800.6
3,559.0
9,899.5
10,677.1
2,494.4
5,312.5
623.6
54,658.5
239,389.7
842,064.4
228,322.6
141.42
2,505.6


95%
UCL
681.9
537.2
7.6
3,356.7
481.2
367.1
16.2
65,661.6
124,924.8
4,604.3
15,027.4
23,202.3
27,082.3
10,156.0
15,344.9
1,872.3
189,185.2
434,718.3
1,301,291
363,362.8
1,313.2
4,988.2

Range of
Concentrations
rue/n
125-880
77-710
4-9
130-4,150
530
170
3-22
5,300-74,000
22,000-140,000
700-5,000
8,000-16,000
1,000-25,000
6,000-30,000
4,000-10,000
3,000-16,000
500-2,000
53,000-180,000
5,000-526,000
10,000-1,823,000
10,000-505,000
1,000-1,300
1,000-7,000

-------
                                  Table B-12 (Page 3 of 3)
 Media:
Location

Surface
Soil
Sediment:
Clinton-
Kalamazoo
Canal
    Chemical

Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranathene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Chrysene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
PCBs
Pyrene

4,4-DDE
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo [ajanthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b&k]fluoranthene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzoic Acid
Beryllium
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chloroform
Chromium
Chrysene
Copper
Indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Pyrene
Vanadium
Zinc
Highest Detected15
  Concentration
       fug/kg)

       7,700
       6,300
       9,000
       8,500
       4,600
       8,000
       4,800
       1,200
       1,730
      20,300

         28
   3,990,000
       3,900
      39,000
        520
        150
        150
        260
         78
        180
        130
         99
          2
      96,000
        200
      14,100
         70
      11,100
     628,000
      10,400
        400
      14,000
      38,900
aCalculation using '/> the detection limit for samples where compound was undetected.
      calculations for these compounds are based on highest detected concentrations only.
GLT959/015.50

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

            Oil Seep Area (Samples: SD01, SD02, SD03)

            Onsite ponds and ditches (Samples: SD05, SD06, SD07, SD08,
            SD09, SD10)

      •     Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal (Samples: SD16, SD17)

            Offsite drainage ditches (Samples: SDH, SD12, SD13, SD14,
            SD15)

The arithmetic average and 95  percent upper confidence limit on the arithmetic
average were calculated for each individual chemical detected in the sediment
samples for each of the four groupings (Table  B-12).  The 95 percent upper
confidence limit on the arithmetic average chemical concentration for each
contaminant was used to estimate carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks from
direct contact with sediment. Only two samples were collected in the Clinton-
Kalamazoo Canal, so the highest detected concentration for each chemical
detected was used for this area. Only contaminants detected in greater than
10 percent of the samples were used for the evaluation.  One half the  contract
detection limit was used when the contaminant was listed as "undetected."

Oil seep water samples included the only samples obtained from the Oil Seep
Area.  The arithmetic average  and the 95 upper confidence limit was calculated
for all contaminants detected in the Oil Seep Area (Table B-12). The 95 upper
confidence limit for each contaminant was the concentration  used to estimate
risks from direct contact with surface water.

Air monitoring data obtained during the site investigation was deemed  to be of
insufficient quality for the risk  assessment.  Potential air releases from  the buried
                                   B-23

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

wastes were modeled to obtain potential onsite air concentrations.  A screening
level (i.e., simple, conservative) modeling approach was used.  The modeling
estimated volatile emissions from the Phase I Landfill.  Test pit data were used
to describe the source of the volatile chemicals.  The 95th percent upper
confidence limit on the arithmetic average chemical concentration in the test pit
samples was used. Volatilization was estimated using a method originally
developed by Farmer (U.S. EPA 1988a).  The volatile emissions were convertical
from an emission rate to ambient concentrations above the source area using a
"box model" approach (U.S. EPA 1986f).

The modeling  methodology is presented in Appendix C. The modeling is
conservative because it assumes steady-state  conditions, a semi-infinite source, no
limitations on  emissions from weather, and no limitations on emissions from site
cover material. The modeled air concentrations  are presented in Table B-13.

Offsite Receptors-Groundwater Use  Setting

Exposure to contaminants through the use of groundwater as a water supply was
estimated for the ingestion, dermal absorption, and inhalation routes of
exposure.  The exposure assumptions used to described groundwater use are
summarized in Table B-ll.

Exposure Frequency and Duration.  Exposure to a contaminated water source in
a residential setting is a continuous  (i.e., daily) type of exposure.  In this
assessment, it  is assumed that exposures occur every day for an entire lifetime.
This is consistent with past approaches the EPA has used in evaluating risks
from  contaminants in drinking water (U.S. EPA  1980).
                                    B-24

-------
                          Table B-13
               MODELED AIR CONCENTRATIONS
                     G&H LANDFILL SITE
     Compound
1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene
Airborne
Concentration
On-site
(mg/m3)
4.76E-02
3.08E-04
1.50E-04
2.30E-04
1.31E-04
2.08E-04
8.43E-04
2.24E-04
8.99E-03
3.34E-03
4.70E-03
Airborne
Concentration
at 300 meters
(mg/m3)
2.46E-03
1.59E-05
7.73E-06
1.19E-05
6.78E-06
1.07E-05
4.35E-05
1.15E-05
4.64E-04
1.73E-04
2.42E-04
Based on simple screening level air modeling. See Appendix D.

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Recently published national statistics on the number of years spent by an
individual in one residence indicate that the average is 9 years and the
90th percentile figure is 30 years (U.S. EPA 1989d).  While this may suggest
that 30 years is the reasonable maximum exposure duration, this assessment
assumed a full lifetime of exposure for consistency with past EPA risk
evaluations.  These assumptions were used to estimate risks from contaminants
detected in samples obtained from industrial, residential, and monitoring wells.

Ingestion.  This assessment follows the EPA's standard set of exposure
assumptions through ingestion of drinking water (U.S. EPA 1980).  By current
U.S. EPA convention, risk estimates were based on the exposure to an adult
consuming 2 liters of water per day.

Dermal Absorption.  The assumptions used in this assessment to describe  this
exposure route are based on recent EPA guidance and professional judgment.
Dermal absorption exposure is a function of permeability of the skin, surface
area exposed, and length of exposure. Permeability constants are not available
for all contaminants so this assessment assumes that contaminants penetrate the
skin  at the same rate as water (U.S. EPA  1989d) and that dermal absorption
exposures  occur primarily during bathing, with daily baths lasting an average of
15 minutes (U.S. EPA 1989c).  The bather is assumed to be 75 percent
immersed.

Inhalation.  There is no standard methodology for estimating the level of  volatile
organic chemicals released from drinking water to household air. Empirical
studies based on radon as well as modeling studies (McKone 1987;
Andelman 1986) suggest residents can be exposed to volatile chemicals in
household air throughout the day and throughout the house, not just in the
bathroom  during showering or bathing.  The level of volatile chemicals in  the
                                   B-25

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

indoor air will be a function of water use and insulation of the house.  Studies
suggest that exposure of residents to volatile chemicals through the inhalation
route may be within the same order of magnitude as exposure through ingestion
of drinking water (assuming 2 liters of water consumed per day).  The estimates
of inhalation exposure compared to ingestion exposure ranged from 25 to
600 percent (McKone  1987).  This assessment does not quantify inhalation
exposures.  It can be assumed that the exposure of residents to volatile
chemicals through inhalation will be  approximately the same level of exposure
predicted to occur through ingestion.

Exposure Point Concentrations. Concentrations from individual, residential, and
industrial wells were used to estimate risks  for each well.  The concentrations
used for  these estimates are presented in Table B-14.  Concentrations from each
well were also compared to current drinking water standards and  criteria.

Data collected from monitoring wells were  used to estimate the potential risks of
current or future populations that would use groundwater as a potable drinking
water source.  Although groundwater flow is generally to the south, the effects
of pumping of offsite wells could be to pull contaminants  toward those wells.
Therefore, monitoring well data could represent potential  offsite  chemical
concentrations.   Based on information presented in Chapter 3, monitoring wells
were grouped together based on site location, groundwater movement, and
specific source areas.  This grouping consisted of five areas and is illustrated in
Figure B-5. The upper 95th percent upper confidence limit of the arithmetic
mean for concentrations detected in each well group was the concentration used
to estimate potential risk.  This concentration was used, per current EPA
guidance (U.S. EPA 1989d), due to  the great uncertainty when estimating
exposure point concentrations. To estimate this number, the  chemical had  to be
detected  in at least 10 percent of the samples.  One-half the contract detection
                                    B-26

-------
                                                 Table B-14 (Page 1 of 3)
                       SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER ONSITE AREAS
Location             Chemical

Area 1       1,1-Dichloroethene
             1,2-Dichloroethane
             2,4-Dimethylphenol
             2-Butanone
             2-Methylnaphthalene
             4-Methylphenol
             Aluminum
             Arsenic
             Barium
             Benzene
             bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
             Carbon disulfide
             Chloroethane
             Chromium
             Cobalt
             Di-N-butylphthalate
             Diethylphthalate
             Ethylbenzene
             Lead
             Manganese
             N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
             Nickel
             Naphthalene
             Phenanthrene
             Phenol
             Vanadium
             Vinyl chloride
             Xylene
             Zinc

Area 2       Aluminum
             Arsenic
             Barium
             Benzene

Number of
Detections
7
12
9
2
12
6
9
43
45
32
9
9
14
7
12
8
8
13
8
44
6
9
12
6
16
9
10
11
11
3
10
12
7

Detection
Frequency (%)
13
23
17
12
23
11
17
84
93
61
17
17
26
13
25
16
15
26
16
91
11
24
23
11
30
19
20
25
78
42
83
100
58
Mean
Concentration
fug/na
47.3
221.8
20.1
225.9
25.8
37.2
89.1
43.2
634.7
130.7
11.1
45.3
90.8
5.5
21.8
20.9
9.3
189.8
3.2
233.8
9.8
24.1
57.6
8.1
10.7
21.3
112.1
2,589.7
522.5
167.2
59.2
398.4
7.9


s^pj1
188.7
1,164.5
37.3
634.2
83.7
120.3
28.9
53.5
938.7
323.2
20.2
183.2
368.0
1.7
8.8
97.6
18.4
532.8
38
384.8
18.4
16.4
192.2
11.3
18.5
7.7
397.8
13,773.1
639.7
216.3
80.8
229.6
8.0

95%
UCL
98.6
538.3
30.2
536.7
48.5
69.9
98.9
57.9
900.3
218.6
16.1
95.1
190.8
5.9
24.3
47.9
14.3
337.5
4.2
342.6
14.7
29.4
109.8
11.2
15.6
23.5
220.3
6,659.4
857.7
327.4
104.9
528.3
12.5
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
1,250
8,400
160
2,500
100
800
169
307
5,990
1,500
100
1,250
2,500
13.6
54.4
702
100
2,900
29.9
2,060
100
109
1,281
71
100
25
2,500
92,340
1,730
693
316
816
24

-------
                                                    Table B-14 (Page 2 of 3)
Location

Area 2
(Continued)
Area 3
        Chemical

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Carbon  disulfide
Manganese
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc

Acetone
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
2-Butanone
Butyl benzylphthalate
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chromium
Cobalt
Di-n-Butylphthalate
2,4-DimethyIphenol
Di-Methylphthalate
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Ethylbenzene
Manganese
Nickel
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Zinc

Number of
Detections
1
4
11
6
4
2
1
6
7
6
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
3

Mean

Detection Concentration
Frequency (%)
»' • ^ * ~~
50
33
100
67
33
100
20
85
100
100
56
16
14
14
14
14
14
56
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
100
33
14
14
100
(ug/na
72.5
11.4
367.3
18.9
4.2
117.1
5.8
216.5
23.2
828.9
8.8
37.5
18.6
2.3
5.1
2.4
5.12
16
12
21.4
5.6
13.8
11.7
55.7
3.8
248.1
45.4
5.6
7.7
78.4
S.D.a
678.5
17.6
252.8
7.7
1.2
56.8
1.6
244.3
14.2
481.6
8.3
72.7
33.2
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.3
8.6
17.1
40.2
1.4
21.7
16.5
124.2
3.3
225.7
35.9
1.4
6.6
14.7

95%
UCL
166.1
21.4
516.7
23.9
4.8
197.3
7.2
397.6
33.7
1,214.3
14.9
95.6
41.2
2.7
5.4
2.6
5.4
22.3
24.7
51.3
6.6
29.9
23.9
147.7
6.3
428.6
86.1
6.6
12.6
95
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
140
56
884
35.8
5
175
9
654
44.5
1,470
26
200
100
2.5
6
2.5
5.9
25
54
120
9
67
52
360
12
723
96.3
9
24
95.2

-------
                                                    Table B-14 (Page 3 of 3)


Location Chemical
Area 4 Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
bis(2-chloroethyl)Ether
Chloroethane
Manganese
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Area 5 Acetone
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Carbon disulfide
Chromium
Cobalt
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Trichloroethene
Vanadium
Zinc

Number of
Detections
3
20
24
8
7
5
23
5
5
7
2
8
9
11
2
5
2
15
2
1
4
3
4

Mean

Detection Concentration
Frequency (%)
16
83
100
33
29
21
100
33
21
100
13
50
56
100
12
31
12
93
12
12
25
21
100
rue/na
141
18.4
345.2
8.3
5.2
6.2
204.6
18.9
4.5
553.1
4.9
705.2
6.9
192.2
2.6
21.4
24.2
324.2
0.2
23.8
5.4
23.2
350
S.D.a
197.8
13.7
317
15.8
1.7
3.2
267.5
5.3
1
582.3
0.6
1,530.1
3.9
171.1
0.4
40.2
3.9
378.3
0.2
9.9
5.7
5.5
220.6

95%
UCL
232.4
23.8
472
14.7
5.9
7.4
313.9
21.6
4.9
984.6
5.2
1,454.9
8.8
296.9
2.8
41.1
26.1
509.6
0.3
30.7
8.3
26.1
566.1
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
953
46.6
1,440
60
11
17
1,150
32.3
5
1,720
6
6,010
15.7
666
4
170
27.5
1,250
0.9
50.1
22
30
720
aCalculation using '/2 the detection limit for samples where compound was undetected.
GLT959/016.50

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

limit was used in the calculation of average concentrations when a chemical was
reported as "not detected." Since some wells had data from multiple sampling
rounds, the arithmetic average of the detected concentrations for that well was
used.  The point concentrations used in the risk estimation are  presented in
Table B-14.

Offsite Receptors-Ambient Exposures

The potential exposure of individuals offsite from the release of VOCs from the
landfill was estimated for a hypothetical receptor located 300 meters east of the
site. This is the approximate distance to the nearest residence  from the site.

Exposure Frequency and Duration. It was conservatively assumed that a
receptor would be exposed on a continuous basis over a 70 year lifetime.  This
assumed that the wind would blow continuously from one direction across the
Phase  I landfill. This conservative approach was used as part of a screening
expand level approach.

Exposure Factors.  Consistent with EPA guidance (U.S. EPA 1989d) it was
assumed that the typical resident would breathe an  average of 20 m3 of air in a
day.

Exposure Point Concentrations.   As discussed,  air monitoring data obtained
during the  site  investigation was deemed to be  of insufficient quality for the risk
assessment. The modeled estimates of potential air releases used to estimate
potential onsite air concentrations were used as a source of offsite air
concentrations.  A simple conservative  gaussian dispersion modeling approach
was used to estimate contaminant transport and dispersion.  The modeling
methodology is presented in Appendix C. It was assumed that the wind blows
                                    B-27

-------
8
d>
                                            •:.   .
                                          !; I02 i'':'':i:!S*'-:-:<:i:«S5:Sf
                                           '
                                                                                                                                                   .",« ;Glrl27A

                                                                                                                                                  i;:  \  •- ":\,..  GH17A.B,C~]ii
                                                                                                                                                  •;   = AUTOMOBILE
                                                                                                                                                         DISPOSAL
                                                                                                                                                                                                  APPROXIMATE
                                                                                                                                                                                                  SCALE IN FEET
                                                                                                                     PHASE I LANDFILL
                             PHASE iii
                            LAf4DFILL
                                                                                                                                                     GH28A;.B
                                                                                                                                                         '
"rf""	PI
 ' •"      iv.'.v.v.-j f-.-.v.:-^   ;.
 3H19A.B  ,	±::trd
                                                                   ;::>... RL17   ::
                                                            PHASE ii LANORLL
                                                                                                                               .
                                                                                                                GH40A,B\  "':-:;:ii>:
                                                                                                                        '""
                                                                                        .. ® GH03A.B.C
       f»• •.. ..... .. •	

GH34A;B:.,..	  " '":"...
                                                                                                                                         •:•'..'.><-•      ':"-"---->'GH09A.B.;-..,.."  x;':
                                                                                                                                                               ROAO-:WV"W<
                                                                                                                                                                        X
                                                                                                                                                                                                              300
                                                LEGEND


                                                «:!:*KKSKS«5«i  LANDFILL BOUNDARY


                                                x ......... x .......... x  U.S. EPA SITE FENCE


                                                            GATE


                                                            DITCH, STREAM, OR
                                                         •   RIVER


                                                            TRAIL


                                                            RAILROAD GRADE
                                                         ;;   (TRACKS REMOVED)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       MONITORING WELL
                                                                                                                                                                                              FIGURE B-5
                                                                                                                                                                                              LOCATIONS AND SAMPLES C
                                                                                                                                                                                              MONITORING WELL AREAS
                                                                                                                                                                                              G & H LANDFILL FS

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

across the landfill in a constant direction, always toward the receptor.  It was
also assumed that emissions are not inhibited by weather conditions or site
cover.  The offsite concentration estimated represented the highest (i.e.,  midline)
concentration at the designated downwind location.  The estimated offsite air
concentrations are presented in Table B-13.
           PUBLIC HEALTH RISK CHARACTERIZATION

This section presents an evaluation  of the potential risks to public health
associated with the G&H Landfill site.  Exposure settings are evaluated
estimating the carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks associated with the
potential exposures.  The estimation of the risks assumed that contaminant
concentrations and intake levels are constant.  Where appropriate, exposure
media concentrations are also compared to standards and criteria for the
protection of human health.  A discussion of qualitative risks for exposure
pathways identified in the exposure assessment is also presented.

RISK ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY

This section summarizes the approach used in developing the human risk
estimates in this section.  A detailed description of the methodologies used in
this assessment  are presented in Appendix C.

Noncarcinogenic Effects

Noncarcinogenic risk is assessed by comparison of the estimated daily intake of a
contaminant to  its RfD. This comparison serves as a measure of the potential
for noncarcinogenic health effects.  The estimated intake of each chemical by an
                                   B-28

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

individual route of exposure is divided by its RfD.  The resulting quotients are
termed hazard quotients.

A "hazard index" approach has  been adopted to assess the potential for
noncarcinogenic effects posed by exposure to multiple chemicals (U.S. EPA
1986c). This method assumes dose additivity.   The hazard quotients are
summed  to provide a hazard index.  When the index exceeds one,  there is a
potential for a noncarcinogenic health risk. If the hazard quotient exceeds one,
the hazard index will exceed one. The hazard  index may exceed one even if
individual intakes do not exceed their respective RfDs. In this case, the
chemicals in the mixtures are segregated by similar effect or target organ to
determine  potential health risks.  Separate indices are derived for each health
effect; if any exceed unity, there  is a  potential for a noncarcinogenic health risk.

Carcinogenic Effects

The potential for carcinogenic effects is evaluated by estimating excess  lifetime
cancer risk. Excess lifetime cancer risk is the incremental increase in the
probability of developing cancer over one's lifetime over the background
probability of developing cancer (i.e., if no exposure to site contaminants
occurs).  For example, a 1 x 10"6 excess lifetime cancer risk means that, for
every 1 million people exposed to the carcinogen throughout their  lifetimes, the
average incidence of cancer is increased by one case of cancer.  Because of the
methods followed by the U.S. EPA in estimating cancer potency factors, the
excess lifetime cancer risks estimated in the  assessment should be regarded as
upper bounds on the potential cancer risks rather than accurate representations
of true cancer risk.
                                     B-29

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

While synergistic or antagonistic interactions might occur between carcinogens
and other chemicals  at the site, there is insufficient information in the
lexicological literature to predict the health effects of these potential
interactions.  Therefore, carcinogenic risks were treated as additive within an
exposure route in this assessment.  This is consistent with the current EPA
guidelines on assessment of chemical mixtures (U.S. EPA 1986c).

QUANTITATIVE RISK ESTIMATION

The  potential risks associated with  G&H  Landfill site are quantified in this
section.  Based on the analysis of exposure pathways presented earlier in this
assessment, the following exposure  pathways were evaluated to determine
potential risks.
             Site visitor exposures
             Offsite receptors—groundwater use
             Offsite receptors—inhalation exposures
Site Visitor Setting

Risk estimates were calculated for the site visitors for direct contact with surface
soil, sediments, oil seep water, and inhalation of volatile chemicals released to
the ambient air from buried waste.  A summary of this evaluation is presented
in Table B-15.  The risk calculation tables for direct contact exposures are
presented in Appendix D, Tables D-l through D-21.  The risk calculation tables
for inhalation exposures  are presented in Appendix D, Tables D-49 and 50.

Surface Soil.  Estimation of risks from direct contact (incidental ingestion) with
surface soil were calculated. The hazard index for ingestion did not exceed  1;
                                     B-30

-------
                                                                    Table B-15
                                                        SUMMARY OF SITE VISITOR RISKS
                                                              G & H LANDFILL SITE
Location/Media
Phase I Landfill
Surface Soils
Oil Seep/
Sediments
Onsite Ponds &
Ditches/Sediments
Clinton/Kalamazoo
Canal/Sediments
Offsite Ditches/
Sediments
OU Seep/Water

Phase I Landfill/
Subsurface Soils
Exposure
Pathway
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Ingestion
Dermal Absorption
Inhalation
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk
Major Chemicals *
PNAs
SUM
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Arochlor 1254
SUM
SUM
SUM
PCB
SUM
PCB
SUM
Risk
4E-06
4E-06
IE-OS
4E-06
4E-06
4E-08
1E-07
5E-07
9E-05
9E-05
5E-06
5E-06
7E-08
Chemical
Exceeding
RfD
None
None
None
None
, None
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzl phthalate
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
None
Noncarcinogenic Risk
Hazard Index
Child <0.01
Adult <0.01
Child 0.019
Adult 0.010
Child <0.01
Adult <0.01
Child 0.017
Adult <0.01
Child 0.064
Adult 0.032
Child 96
Adult 48
Child 2.1
Adult 1.0
Adult <0.01
'Chemicals with excess lifetime cancer risks equal to or greater than 1  x 10-6

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

therefore, based on the limited surface soil data, there appears to be no
potential noncarcinogenic health risk from ingestion exposure to surface soils.
Because of the limited surface soil data, the excess lifetime cancer risk was
estimated for ingestion exposure using the highest  detected chemical
concentrations detected in surface soil.  The carcinogens detected in the soil
were PCBs and PNAs.  The excess lifetime cancer risk estimate was 4 x 10"*.
The excess lifetime cancer risk associated with any chemical did not exceed
1 x 10-6.

Sediment  Estimation of risks from direct contact (incidental ingestion) with
contaminated sediments was calculated for onsite ponds, the Oil Seep Area,
offsite  ditches, and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal.
                          i.
No hazard indexes exceeded for any of the sediment groups.  This indicates that
there are no potential noncarcinogenic risks from  ingestion of sediment.

Excess lifetime cancer risks were calculated for ingestion of sediment from each
sediment group.  The highest excess cancer risk was 4 x 10"6 for the Oil Seep
Area.  The chemical contributing the most to this  risk was PCB (Aroclor 1254).
Excess lifetime cancer risk estimates did not exceed 1 x 10"6 for any of the
remaining areas, for which  risks ranged from 1 x  10~7 to 4 x 10"8.
Inorganic data were available only for the offsite  ditches and the Clinton-
Kalamazoo Canal areas. Risks associated with inorganic contaminants in the oil
seep sediments and onsite ponds cannot be estimated.

Oil Seep Water.  Estimation of risks for direct  contact with surface water in the
oil seep area were calculated for both ingestion and dermal absorption.  All
estimates were based on a  single accidental contact with chemicals in the oil
seep surface water. The hazard index exceeded 1 for  ingestion exposure for
                                    B-31

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

both child and adult exposure settings.  The RfD for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
was exceeded for both child and adult exposure settings.

Excess lifetime cancer risk estimates were calculated for both ingestion and
dermal absorption.  The estimate was 9 x 10~5 for ingestion and 5 x 10"6 for
dermal absorption.  The chemical  contributing the most to the risks was PCB
(Aroclor 1254).  Because inorganic data were not available for samples collected
in the surface water, the risks associated with direct contact with inorganic
contaminant  in surface water cannot be estimated.

Inhalation of Volatile Compounds. The potential inhalation exposure to a
hypothetical site visitor was estimated. A conservative, simple, screening level
modeling approach was taken to estimate potential ambient air concentrations.
The excess lifetime cancer risk was estimated at 7 x 10"8 and the hazard index
did not exceed 1.  Based on this, the inhalation risks to site visitors were
considered too minimal to require a more detailed evaluation.

Offsite Receptors—Groundwater Users

Using a residential exposure setting, contaminants detected in residential,
industrial, and monitoring well samples were evaluated for potential risks.

Estimates were calculated for both ingestion and dermal absorption exposure
routes.  The excess lifetime cancer risks from ingestion were approximately
three orders of magnitude higher than those from dermal absorption. Detected
concentrations of contaminants for each well were also compared to current
drinking water standards and criteria.

Residential  and Industrial Wells.  The calculations of risk based on data from
                                     B-32

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

residential and industrial wells are presented in Appendix D, Tables D-22 to
D-31. A summary of risks from these wells is presented in Table B-16.
Concentrations were  detected only in wells from industrial locations.  Residential
use exposure assumptions were  used to estimate potential  risks because it was
the most conservative of potential groundwater use.

No RfDs or hazard indexes were exceeded for any well, indicating no potential
noncarcinogenic risk  to groundwater users.  The highest excess cancer risk
estimate for ingestion was 2 x 10"4 for groundwater in well GR-01. The
contaminants contributing the most to this risk estimate were vinyl chloride,
trichloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethane, and 1,1-dichloroethene.  Groundwater from
the other wells had risk estimates of 1 x W4  (GR-04) and 3 x W6 (GR-03).
The cancer risks from dermal absorption were estimated to be approximately
three orders of magnitude less than risks from ingestion.

Monitoring Wells.  The calculation of risks for groundwater from monitoring
wells are presented in Appendix D, Tables D-32 to D-41.  These risks are
summarized in Table B-17.  Based on the 95  percent upper confidence limit on
the arithmetic average  concentrations, groundwater use does not appear to have
a notable potential to result in noncarcinogenic health risks. No estimates of a
chemical's intake by  ingestion or dermal absorption routes of exposure exceeded
an RfD. Although the ingestion hazard index for Areas 1 and 3 exceeded 1,
when chemicals are grouped by similar effect, none of the hazard indexes for
these individual effect groupings did not exceed 1.

Two sets of excess lifetime cancer risks were  estimated: one including arsenic
and one excluding arsenic.  The maximum probable concentration of arsenic in
groundwater for the  site is 18 jig/1. This is within the range of background for
arsenic  naturally occurring in groundwater.  In three  of the five areas (Areas 1,
                                    B-33

-------
                                                         Table B-16
                           SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER USE RISKS - RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL WELLS
                                                    G & H LANDFILL SITE
Exposure
Well Pathway
GR-01 Ingestion
GR-01 Dermal Absorption
GR-02 Ingestion
GR-02 Dermal Absorption
GR-03 Ingestion
GR-03 Dermal Absorption
GR-04 Ingestion
GR-04 Dermal Absorption
GR-13 Ingestion
GR-13 Dermal Absorption
Chemical
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk Exceeding
Major Chemicals* Risk RfD
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Benzene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
SUM
SUM
SUM
SUM
1,1-Dichloroethane
SUM
SUM
1,1-Dichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
SUM
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
SUM
SUM
SUM
8E-06 None
9E-06
7E-07
8E-06
1E-04
2E-04
2E-07 None
8E-06 None
IE-OS None
3E-06 None
3E-06
4E-09 None
1E-06 None
1E-04
1E-04
2E-09 None
2E-07
2E-07
2E-07 None
3E-10 None
Noncarcinogenic Risk
Hazard Index
0.011
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.002
<.01
<.01
<.01
Chemicals with excess lifetime cancer risks equal to or greater than 1 x 10-6

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                                       Table B-17
                                     SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER USE RISKS
                                                  G & H LANDFILL SITE
 Area	Exposure Pathway
                Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk
       Major Chemicals	Risk
             Chemical
             Exceeding
               RfD
              Noncarcinogenic
             Risk Hazard Index
               (sum for area)
 Area 1     Ingestion
Arsenic
Benzene
bis(2-Chlorethyl)ether
1,1 -Dichloroethane
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Vinyl chloride
                                                         SUM
                                               Sum w/o Arsenic
3E-03
2E-04
5E-04
3E-04
2E-06
1E-02
None
 1.8
                                       1E-02
                                       1E-02
           Dermal Absorption
Arsenic
Vinyl chloride
                                                         SUM
                                               Sum w/o Arsenic
4E-06
2E-05
3E-05
2E-05
None
<0.01
 Area 2     Ingestion
Arsenic
Benzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
                                                         SUM
                                               Sum w/o Arsenic
6E-03
IE-OS
7E-05
None
 0.7
                                       6E-03
                                       8E-05
           Dermal Absorption
Arsenic
                                                         SUM
                                               Sum w/o Arsenic
8E-06
                                                                                       None
                  <0.01
                                       8E-06
                                       1E-07
 Area 3     Ingestion
Arsenic
Benzene
                                                         SUM
                                               Sum w/o Arsenic
2E-03
IE-OS
None
  1.0
                                       2E-03
                                       IE-OS
           Dermal Absorption
Arsenic
                                                         SUM
                                               Sum w/o Arsenic
                                       3E-06
                                                                                       None
                                 <0.01
                                       3E-06
                                       2E-08

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                                     Table B-17
                                    SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER USE RISKS
                                                G & H LANDFILL SITE
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk
Area Exposure Pathway Major Chemicals Risk
Area 4 Ingestion Arsenic 1E-03
Benzene IE-OS
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 2E-04
SUM 2E-03
Sum w/o Arsenic 2E-04
Dermal Absorption Arsenic 2E-06
SUM 2E-06
Sum w/o Arsenic 3E-07
Area 5 Ingestion Arsenic 5E-04
Trichloroethene 3E-06
SUM 5E-04
Sum w/o Arsenic 3E-06
Dermal Absorption
SUM 7E-07
Sum w/o Arsenic 3E-09
Chemical Noncarcinogenic
Exceeding Risk Hazard Index
RfD (sum for area)
None <0.5
None <.01
None 0.7
None <.01
 *Chemicals with excess lifetime cancer risks equal to or greater than 1 x 10-6

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

2, and 3) the 95 percent upper confidence limit for arsenic was substantially
above background.  In those three areas arsenic is a major contributing
contaminant to  the risk estimate.  In Areas 4 and 5, where arsenic is within the
range of the calculated background concentrations, the estimate of risk without
arsenic may be  more representative of excess carcinogenic risk attributable to
site contaminants in groundwater.

The excess lifetime cancer risks from groundwater ingestion exposure were
estimated  to range from 1 x 10"2 (Area 1) to 5 x 10"4 (Area 5) for the sum of
risk including arsenic, and 1 x 10~2 (Area 1) to 3 x 10"6 (Area 5) for the sum of
risk excluding arsenic.  In addition to arsenic, benzene, bis(2-ethyhexyl)phthalate,
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, 1,1-dichloroethane, N-nitrosodiphenylamine,
trichlorethene, and vinyl chloride were detected in various groundwater samples
from the five areas in concentrations that were estimated to  exceed  1 x 10"6
excess lifetime cancer risk.  Dermal absorption risks were approximately three
orders of  magnitude less than risks from ingestion.

Comparison to  Standards and Criteria.  Because the aquifer is used as a
drinking water source the concentrations of chemicals detected in  groundwater
samples obtained from residential, industrial, and monitoring wells were
compared to current drinking water standards and criteria.

The comparison of residential and industrial well data to EPA drinking water
standards  and criteria is summarized  in Table B-18.  The MCLG for
trichloethene was exceeded for wells  GR-01, GR-02, GR-03,  and GR-13.  The
MCL for  trichlorethene was also exceeded for wells GR-01 and GR-02.  The
MCL and MCLG for vinyl  chloride was exceeded for GR-01 and GR-04.
                                    B-34

-------
                                      Table B-18
                        SUMMARY OF RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
                   WELL CONCENTRATIONS WHICH EXCEED CRITERIA
                                 G & H LANDFILL SITE
Well
Location Chemical
GR01-01 Benzene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
GR02-01 Trichloroethene
GR03-01 Trichloroethene
GR04-01 Vinyl chloride
GR 13-01 Trichloroethene
(a) Criteria
Concentration Criteria Concentration
ug/1 Exceeded ug/1
0.8 MCLG
25 MCL
MCLG
2 MCL
MCLG
8 MCL
MCLG
1 MCLG
2 MCL
MCLG
0.7 MCLG
0
5
0
2
0
5
0
0
2
0
0
(a) Criteria is defined as follows:
     MCL - Maximum Contaminant Levels
   MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Level Goals

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

The comparison of monitoring well data to EPA drinking water standards and
criteria is presented in Table D-43 through D-47 and summarized in Table B-19.
Numerous criteria were exceeded  at various monitoring well locations. The
MCL and Health Advisory for arsenic were exceeded for wells in Areas  1, 2,
and 3. The secondary MCL for iron and manganese was exceeded for wells in
all five areas.  Concentrations of vinyl chloride detected in wells from Areas 1,
2, and 4 exceeded both the MCL  and MCLG. Benzene concentrations detected
in Areas  1, 2, and 3 exceeded the MCL and MCLG. The MCL for lead was
exceeded in Areas  1, 3, and 5. Other contaminants  that exceeded criteria
include PCB (Area 1), barium (Areas 1, 3, and 4), and trichloroethene (Area 5).

Offsite Inhalation Exposures

The potential inhalation exposure  to  a hypothetical resident was estimated.  A
conservative screening level modeling approach was  taken. The hazard index
was not exceeded by inhalation. The excess lifetime cancer risk was estimated
at  1 x 10"6.  This risk estimate is conservative (i.e., potentially overestimating
risks) for several reasons.  The exposure estimate assumed a continuous release
of volatile chemicals from the landfill. This does not address the effect of
                                           £-6-
weather conditions that could limit emissions (*», low temperature, precipitation,
and snow cover).  The exposure estimates also assumed that the wind always
blows across the landfill (from the west) toward the  receptors. It was further
assumed  that receptors are exposed  continuously for 70 years.  The potential
exposure point  air concentrations  estimated represent the concentrations along a
centerline of a  downwind plume (i.e., the highest potential concentrations).  For
these reasons, the offsite receptor risks are  likely to  be less than 1 x  10"6.
                                    B-35

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                 Table B-19
           SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS THAT EXCEED
           U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS.CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES
                             G & H LANDFILL SITE


Well Area
Area 1
Phase I Landfill
and
Oil Seep Areas

(52 total wells)

























Area 2
Phase II Landfill

(12 total wells)








Chemical
Arsenic

Benzene

Iron
Manganese
Vinyl chloride

Nickel
Xylene



Ethyl benzene


Aroclor 1254

Barium



Aluminum
Toluene



Lead


Trichloroethene
Arsenic

Iron
Manganese
Nickel
Benzene

Vinyl chloride
Aluminum
Xylene

(a)
Criteria
MCL
DW
MCLG
MCL
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
TP
SMCL-Prop
DW
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
MCLG-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCL
MCL
MCLG-Prop
DW
SMCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
MCLG
MCL
DW
SMCL
SMCL
TP
MCLG
MCL
MCLG
SMCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
Criteria
Concentration
(ug/0
50
50
0
5
300
50
0
2
15.4
20
400
10000
10000
30
700
700
0
0.5
1000
5000
5000
1500
50
40
2000
2000
2420
5
20
20
0
50
50
300
50
15.4
0
5
0
50
20
Number of
Wells Exceeding
Criteria
17
17
38
28
46
41
11
9
7
17
12
1
1
14
5
5
10
10
9
3
3
3
4
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
4
4
11
8
3
7
5
1
1
1

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                Table B-19
           SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS THAT EXCEED
           U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS.CRTTERIA AND GUIDELINES
                             G & H LANDFILL SITE


Well Area
Area 3
Phase III Landfill

(7 wells total)








Area 4
Clinton/
Kalamazoo Canal

(24 wells total)





Area 5
Automobile
Disposal Yard

(16 wells total)










Chemical
Arsenic

Lead
Aluminum
Barium
Iron
Manganese
Benzene

Nickel
Chloroform
2-Butanone
Iron
Manganese
Benzene

Nickel
Lead
Aluminum
Barium
Vinyl chloride

Iron
Manganese
Trichloroethene

Aluminum
Lead



Chromium




(a)
Criteria
MCL
DW
MCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
TP
MCL
DW
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
TP
MCL-Prop
SMCL-Prop
MCL
MCLG
MCL
SMCL
SMCL
MCLG
MCL
SMCL-Prop
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
MCL
MCL
MCL-Prop
MCLG-Prop
DW
Criteria
Concentration
(ug/1)
50
50
5
50
1000
300
50
0
5
15.4
100
170
300
50
0
5
15.4
5
50
1000
0
2
300
50
0
5
50
5
20
20
50
50
100
100
120
Number of
Wells Exceeding
Criteria
1
1
2
6
3
7
7
5
5
1
1
1
19
17
8
4
3
1
2
2
3
3
6
14
4
4
7
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
(a) Criteria abbreviations:
MCL -
MCLG -
SMCL -
DW -
Prop -
TP -
Maximum Contaminant
Maximum Contaminant
Level
Level Goal




Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level
Drinking Water Lifetime Health Advisory
Proposed standard or criteria
Ambient Water Quality
Criteria for Toxicity
Protection


-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

RISKS NOT QUANTITATIVELY ADDRESSED

Residents Offsite—Inhalation of Dusts

Contaminants have been detected in locations sparsely distributed throughout the
site.  Most of the site is capped and vegetated, so the dust may be released
from this area only if the surface is disturbed.  The surface soil data is limited
because it was presumed that the site  surface would be generally
uncontaminated (i.e., clean cover).  The areas of primary concern are the
Phase I Landfill  and the Oil Seep Area.  Based on the sample analysis, the
contaminants of  concern would include inorganic compounds, PCBs, and PNAs.


Recreational Users—Surface Water and Sediments

Contaminants have been detected in the surface water and sediments of the
Clinton River and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal, but they cannot be directly
associated with the G&H Landfill site. Leachate from the Phase III Landfill
may discharge to the wetland area to  the west.  The wetlands drain into the
Clinton River, and shallow groundwater from the site may discharge to the river
and the canal. Consequently, there are mechanisms for contaminants from the
site to reach these surface water bodies.  Although people have access to the
river and canal for recreational activities, the amount of contact that recreational
users may have with the surface water and sediments is  not known.  There is
not enough information or data to quantify the potential risk from recreational
activities.
                                    B-36

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

People Consuming Fish and Wildlife

There may exist a potential for exposure to site contaminants through the
ingestion of wildlife and fish obtained from the G&H Landfill area.  Potential
exposure pathways exist that could allow fish and terrestrial wildlife to come into
contact with  contaminants from the site.  Wildlife trapped near the area have
been found to contain concentrations of contaminants also detected on the site.
However, due to the home range and habits of the wildlife  and the presence of
another NPL site  and industry near the site, these  contaminants cannot  be
attributed only to  the G&L Landfill site.

The animals trapped included opossum, raccoon, and muskrat. Actual hunting
and consumption patterns of local resident are not know.  If these animals are
hunted only  for sport, consumption risks would be  negligible.

People fish the Clinton River and the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal.   Contaminants
have been detected in fish and macroinvertebrate organisms from the Clinton
River.  However, while the potential pathways exist for aquatic organisms to be
exposed to site contaminants, the contamination detected in the aquatic
organisms can not be definitely attributed to the site.  Consequently,  the risks
from consumption of contaminated fish close to the site can not be estimated.


                 LIMITATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS

UNCERTAINTY FACTORS

Risk assessment as a scientific activity is subject to uncertainty, both with risk
assessment in general (Table B-20) and regarding an understanding of the site
                                   B-37

-------
                                                      Table B-20
                                         GENERAL UNCERTAINTY FACTORS
                                                G&H LANDFILL  SITE
  Uncertainty Factor

Use of cancer potency
factors.
Risks/doses within an
exposure route assumed to be
additive.

Toxicity values derived
primarily from animal studies.
Toxicity values derived
primarily from high doses,
most exposures are at low
doses.

Toxicity values.
Affect of absorption.
Affect of applying critical
toxicity values to soil
exposures.
Estimating inhalation
exposures for released
volatiles.
Effect of Uncertainty

May overestimate risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
May overestimate risks.
May over- or underestimate
risks.
            Comment

Potencies are upper 95th percent confidence limits
derived from the linearized model.  Considered
unlikely to underestimate true risk.

Does not account for synergism or antagonism.
Extrapolation from animal to humans may induce
error due to differences in absorption,
pharmacokinetics, target organs, enzymes, and
population variability.

Assumes linear at low doses. Tends to have
conservative exposure assumptions.
Not all values represent the same degree of
certainty.  All are subject to change as new
evidence becomes available.

The assumption that absorption is equivalent
across species is implicit  in the derivation of the
critical toxicity values.  Absorption may actually
vary with species and age.

Assumes bioavailability of contaminants sorbed
onto soils is the same as delivered in lab studies.s
Contaminants delivered in studies may be more
bioavailable.

Release and migration  of volatiles in the
subsurface soils subject to variability in  wind
direction, temperature, and chemical
concentrations.
GLT959/017.50

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

or site-specific uncertainties (Table B-21).  This assessment is subject to
uncertainty pertaining to:

      •     Sampling and analysis
      •     Fate and transport estimation
      •     Exposure estimation
      •     Toxicological data
ASSUMPTIONS

The major assumptions used in this assessment are:

      •      Contaminant concentrations remain constant over the exposure
             period.

      •      Exposure remains constant over time

      •      Selected intake rates  and population characteristics (weight, life
             span, activities) are representative for the potentially exposed
             population.

      •      All intake of contaminants is from the site-related exposure media
             and not from other sources (i.e., no relative source contribution).
                                    B-38

-------
                                                      Table B-21
                                       SITE-SPECIFIC UNCERTAINTY FACTORS
                                                G&H LANDFILL SITE
  Uncertainty Factor

Metals analysis for total
metals only.
Not all chemicals at the site
have toxicity values.

No relative source
contribution is accounted for.
Contaminant loss during
sampling.

Some routes of exposure
were not quantified.

Analysis limited to TCL/TAL
chemicals.
Exposure assumptions.



Exposures assumed constant.


Method detection limits.
Buried waste/remaining
contaminant sources.

Addition of risks across
exposure pathways.

Not all high hazard
metal data received.

Accidental exposure to
surface water based on
toxicity values.

Modeling used to estimate
potential volatile chemical
releases from landfill.
Air transport modeling used
for offsite ambient air
concentrations.
Exposure assumptions for
offsite air exposures.
Effect of Uncertainty

May overestimate risk.



May underestimate risk.


May underestimate risk.



May underestimate risk.


May underestimate risk.


May underestimate risk.
May under- or overestimate
risk.
May under- or overestimate
risk.

May underestimate risk.
May underestimate risk.


May under- or overestimate
risk.

May underestimate risk.


May overestimate risk.



May overestimate risk.




May overestimate risk.




May overestimate risk.
            Comment

Did not distinguish between valence or speciation.
Assumed the metal was present in its most toxic
form.

These chemicals are not addressed quantitatively.
Risk summed over media may exceed the
maximum risk posed by one medium. Does not
account for non-site related sources of exposure.

May underestimate  VOCs present.
Dermal absorption from soil and sediment not es-
timated.

The TCL/TAL chemicals may represent only a
subset of the toxic chemicals which are present at
the site.

Assumptions regarding media intake, population
characteristics, and exposure patterns may not
characterize exposures.

Does not account for environmental fate, transport,
or transfer which may alter concentration.

For some chemicals (such as benzene), the method
detection limit is above  a concentration which
might be of concern.

Future releases could exceed concentrations
detected during the RI.

Some exposure routes have greater uncertainty
associated with their risk estimates than others.

Metal data not received for sediments and surface
water in oil seep area.

Risk based on chronic toxicity values, exposure
would be acute.
Conservative estimation process. Assumed semi-
infinite source, no seasonal reduction in emissions,
no absorption on soil, and no limitation of releases
by soil cover.

Risks based on concentration along a centerline.
Assumed most stable wind conditions, wind
direction constant from one direction, and
continuous emissions.

Exposure estimates assumed continuous exposure
for 70 years.
GLT959/018.50

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                                SUMMARY

The baseline risk assessment evaluated the potential public health risks posed by
the G&H Landfill site under the no-action alternative (i.e., no remedial action).
Risks were evaluated under current site conditions with no change in the site
conditions or future use of the site.  The results of the baseline assessment are
summarized in Table B-22.

The major exposures pathways for the G&H Landfill site were identified. They
include:  exposure of site visitors through direct contact with Phase I Landfill
surface soil, sediments and surface water from the Oil  Seep Area^and the use of
contaminated groundwater  as a water supply source. Each of these exposure
pathways had lifetime cancer risk estimates that exceeded 1 x  10"6.

Other potential site-related exposures pathways were identified including:  the
direct contact with sediments in onsite ponds, offsite ditches, Clinton-Kalamazoo
Canal; the inhalation of volatile chemicals released from subsurface; exposure of
recreational users of the Clinton River and Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal through
contact with surface water  and sediments; and ingestion of fish and wildlife from
the area.  The risks from contact with these sediments and the inhalation of
volatile chemicals were estimated to be less than  1 x 10"6.  The risks associated
with water recreational use and consumption of fish and wildlife could not be
estimated,  although these exposure pathways remain a possibility.
GLT959/008.50
                                    B-39

-------
                                                                           Table B-22
                                                           SUMMARY OF HUMAN HEALTH RISKS
                                                                    G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                                                                                                                     Page 1 of 2
     Exposure Pathway
   Exposure Point
       Risk Characterization
      Primary Chemicals of Interest
           Comments
Site visitors come in
direct contact with
surface soils, onsite
sediments, or exposed
waste (i.e. oil seep)
Onsite
Cancer Risk-Surface Soil
4 X 10-6

Cancer Risk-Sediment in
Oil Seep Area 4 X 10-6

Cancer Risk-Other Onsite
Sediments-ranged from 1 x 10-7
to4X 10-8.
PCBs, PNAs
                                                              Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
                                                              PCB
Surface soil contamination
sparsely distributed in the
Phase I Landfill.
Sediments in oil seep ponds.
Risk doesn't include inorganic
data.
Site visitors inhale
volatile chemicals
released from buried
waste
Onsite
Noncarcinogenic Risks-
Hazard Index < 1

Cancer Risk - Ambient Air
7 X 10-8
                                                                                            No individual chemical intakes
                                                                                            exceeded its RfD.
                                            Risks based on available data;
                                            Inorganic data not received.

                                            Air concentrations based on
                                            conservative screening level
                                            modeling.  Exposures likely
                                            to be lower.
                                                        Noncarcinogenic Risks -
                                                        Hazard Index < 1
                                                              No individual chemical intakes
                                                              exceeded its RfD.
                                                                                Air concentrations based on
                                                                                conservative screening level
                                                                                modeling.  Exposures likely
                                                                                to be lower.
Site visitors come in
accidental direct contact
with contaminated oil seep
surface water.
Onsite
Ingestion Cancer Risk -
9 X 10-5

Dermal Absorption Cancer Risk •
5 X 10-6
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
PCB

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
PCB
Inorganic chemical data not
received.
                                                        Noncarcinogenic Risks -
                                                        Hazard Index > 1 for both
                                                        ingestion and dermal
                                                        absorption.
                                                              Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
                                                              Butylbenzylphthalate
                                                                                Inorganic chemical data not
                                                                                received.

-------
                                                                            Table B-22
                                                            SUMMARY OF HUMAN HEALTH RISKS
                                                                     G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                                                                                                                      Page 2 of 2
     Exposure Pathway
   Exposure Point
       Risk Characterization
       Primary Chemicals of Interest
            Comments
Release of contaminants
to groundwater used as
drinking water supply
Existing residential,
industrial wells
Cancer risks individual
private wells  1 X 10-4 to
2 X 10-7.

Noncarcinogenic Risks -
Hazard Index < 1
1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene,
1,1-Dichloroethene, Vinyl
Chloride, Trichloroethene

No individual chemical's intake
exceeded its RfD
Risks based on concentrations
detected in industrial wells,
not currently used for
drinking water.
                               Offsite wells in
                               future
                          Cancer risks monitoring wells
                          range from 1 X 10-2 to
                          5 X 10-4.
                                     Arsenic, Benzene,
                                     Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
                                     1,1-Dichloroethane, Vinyl
                                     Chloride, Trichloroethene,
                                     Bis(2-chloroehtyl)ether,
                                     N-nitrosodiphenylamine
                                             Risks include arsenic
                                             concentrations.  Current
                                             groundwater use is limited,
                                             but no groundwater use
                                             restrictions in place.
                                                         Noncarcinogenic risk Hazard
                                                         Index > 1 for Areas 1 and 3
                                                              No individual chemical's
                                                              intake exceeded its RfD.
Volatilization and
release of volatile
chemicals from subsurface
with subsequent release
to nearby residents and
businesses
Offsite (residents
businesses)
Cancer Risk - Ambient Air
1 X 10-6
Trichloroethane, carbon
tetrachloride, benzene
Air concentrations based on
conservative screening level
modeling.  Assumed cap does not
limit releases, constant
release, and contains exposure.
Exposures likely to be lower.
No individaul chemical risk
equal to or greater than
1 x 10-6.
                                                         Noncarcinogenic risks
                                                         Hazard Index <  1
                                                              No individual chemical intakes
                                                              exceeded its RfD.
                                                                                 Air concentrations based on
                                                                                 conservative screening level
                                                                                 modeling. Exposures likely
                                                                                 to be lower.

-------
                          Appendix C
       PUBLIC HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
GLT959/020.50-3

-------
                                          AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

                           Appendix C
PUBLIC HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

                    EXPOSURE ESTIMATION

Exposure is defined as the contact of an organism with a chemical or physical
agent. In this assessment, exposure is normalized for time and body weight.
Exposure normalized for time and body weight is termed "intake."  Chemical
intake is expressed as mg chemical/kg body weight/day.

GENERIC ESTIMATION OF INTAKE

Equation C-l presents a generic equation for calculating chemical intake
(U.S. EPA  1989).

      I     =     (C x CR x EF x ED) * (BW x AT)                (C-l)

where:

      I     =     Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
      C    =     Chemical concentration (e.g, mg/1)
      CR   =     Contact rate (e.g., /day)
      EF   =     Exposure frequency (days/year)
      ED   =     Exposure duration (years)
      BW   =     Body weight (kg)
      AT   =     Averaging time (days)
                                C-l

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Carcinogens

A lifetime average intake (or chronic daily intake) of the chemical is estimated
for carcinogens.  This acts to prorate the total cumulative intake over a lifetime.
An averaging time (AT) of 70 years is used for carcinogens.

Intake can change over a lifetime as body weight, contact rate,  exposure
frequency, and chemical concentrations change.  Equation C-l can be modified
to address this issue:

                           M
       I      =     (I/AT)  Z (Q x CRi x EF x ED) * BW;               (C-2)
where:
             =     Chronic daily intake of the chemical (mg/kg body
                   weight/day)
             =     Chemical concentration in ith time period (e.g, mg/1)
             =     Contact rate in ith time period (e.g., /day)
             =     Exposure frequency in ith time period (days/year)
       M     =     Number of time periods
       ED   =     Exposure duration  in ith time period (years)
       BWj   =     Body weight in ith time period (kg)
       AT   =     Averaging time (days)

U.S. EPA typically assumes a constant  body weight (typically 70 kg)  in
estimating lifetime cancer risk.  This assumption would alter equation C-3 to
yield the following:
                                    C-2

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

                               M
                   l/(ATxBW)  E (Q x CRj x EF x ED)                (C-3)
Noncarcinogens

The chemical intake of noncarcinogens is estimated over the appropriate
exposure period or averaging time. The averaging time selected depends on the
toxic endpoint being assessed.

When evaluating exposures to developmental toxicants, intakes are calculated by
averaging over the exposure event (e.g., a day or single exposure incident).  For
acute toxicants, intakes are calculated by averaging over the shortest exposure
period that could  produce an effect, usually an exposure event or a day. For
both situations, it  can  be assumed that the averaging time and the exposure
period are equal.  Therefore, equation C-l can be simplified to:

       I      =     (C x CR) + (BW)                                    (C-4)
where:

       I      =     Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
       C     =     Chemical concentration (e.g, mg/1)
       CR    =     Contact rate (e.g., /day)
       BW   =     Body weight (kg)

When  evaluating exposure to noncarcinogenic systemic toxicants, intakes are
calculated by averaging intakes over the  period of exposure.  The averaging time
used is no longer  than a year and may conservatively be estimated to be a day.
In the latter situation, intake can be estimated using equation  C-4.
                                    C-3

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

MEDIUM-SPECIFIC INTAKES

The following sections present the methodology for estimating intake from
specific environmental media.

Intake—Drinking Water

An equation for calculating chemical intake through ingestion of drinking water
is presented below:

      I     =    (CW x IR x EF x ED x CF) + (BW x AT)           (C-5)

where:

      I     =    Chemical intake  (mg/kg body weight/day)
      CW  =    Chemical concentration in water (pg/1)
      IR    =    Ingestion rate (/day)
      EF   =    Exposure frequency (days/year)
      ED   =    Exposure duration (years)
      BW  =    Body weight (kg)
      AT   =    Averaging time (days)
      CF   =    Conversion factor (10"3 mg/yg)

Intake—Soil Ingestion

An equation for calculating chemical intake through ingestion of soil or sediment
is  presented below:

      I     =     (CS x IR x EF x DF x ED x CF) + (BW x AT)       (C-6)
                                   C-4

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
where:
      I     =     Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
      CS    =     Chemical concentration in soil (ng/kg)
      IR    =     Ingestion rate (/day)
      EF    =     Exposure frequency (days/year)
      DF   =     Desorption factor (assume  100%)
      ED   =     Exposure duration (years)
      BW   =     Body weight (kg)
      AT   =     Averaging time (days)
      CF    =     Conversion factor (10'3 mg/yg x 10'3 kg/g)

Intake—Dermal Contact Soil

An equation for calculating chemical  intake through dermal absorption of
chemicals from  soil is presented below:

      I =  (CS x SA x DF x AF x EF x ED x CF) - (BW x AT)        (C-7)

where:

      I     =    Chemical intake  (mg/kg body weight/day)
      CW  =    Chemical concentration in soil (yg/kg)
      SA   =    Surface area (cm2)
      DF   =    Desorption factor
      AF   =    Adherence factor—soil to skin (mg/cm2)
      EF   =    Exposure frequency (days/year)
      ED   =    Exposure duration (years)
      BW  =    Body weight (kg)
      AT   =    Averaging time (days)
                                   C-5

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

      CF   =    Conversion factor (10"6 kg/yg)

Intake — Dermal Contact Water

An equation for calculating chemical intake through dermal absorption of
chemicals in water is presented below:

      I  =  (CW x SA x PC x ET x EF x ED x CF) * (BW x AT)       (C-8)

where:

      I     =    Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
      CW  =    Chemical concentration in water (pg/1)
      SA   =    Surface area (cm2)
      PC   =    Permeability of water  (cm/hr)
      ET   =    Exposure time per day (hour/day)
      EF   =    Exposure frequency (days/year)
      ED   =    Exposure duration (years)
      BW  =    Body weight (kg)
      AT   =    Averaging time (days)
      CF   =    Conversion factor (volumetric for water and unit conversion
                  - lO'3 I/cm3 x 10'3
Intake — Inhalation of Airborne (Vapor Phase) Chemicals

An equation for calculating chemical intake through inhalation of vapor phase
contaminants is presented below:

       I  =  (CA x IR x ET x EF x ED x CF) * (BW x AT)              (C-9)
                                   C-6

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

where:

      I     =    Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
      CA   =    Chemical concentration in air (jig/m3)
      IR    =    Inhalation rate (m3/hour)
      ET   =    Exposure time (hours/day)
      EF   =    Exposure frequency (days/year)
      ED   =    Exposure duration (years)
      BW   =    Body weight (kg)
      AT   =    Averaging time (days)
      CF   =    Conversion factor (10~3
Intake — Inhalation of Airborne (Sorbed to Dust) Chemicals

Equation C-10 presents an equation for calculating chemical intake through
inhalation of contaminants sorbed to airborne dusts.

      I  =  (CA x PR x IR x ET x EF x ED x CF) * (BW x AT)       (C-10)

where:

      I      =    Chemical intake (mg/kg body weight/day)
      CA   =    Chemical concentration in air (ng/m3)
      IR    =    Inhalation rate (m3/hour)
      PR    =    Percent of dust in respirable range
      ET    =    Exposure time (hours/day)
      EF    =    Exposure frequency (days/year)
      ED   =    Exposure duration (years)
      BW   =    Body weight (kg)
      AT   =    Averaging time (days)
      CF    =    Conversion factor (10~3 mg/yg)
                                    C-7

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                CARCINOGENIC RISK ESTIMATION

For carcinogens, risks are estimated as the incremental probability of an
individual developing cancer over a lifetime as a result of exposure to a
potential carcinogen.  The cancer potency factor or slope factor (SF) converts
estimated daily chemical intakes averaged over a lifetime of exposure directly to
incremental risk.

To estimate risks from exposure to carcinogens, the following is needed:

      •     Chronic daily intake of the chemical
      •     Carcinogenic potency  factor

ESTIMATING CANCER RISKS CAUSED BY
EXPOSURE TO A SINGLE CARCINOGEN

The one-hit equation can be used to describe excess lifetime cancer  risk from
exposure to a carcinogen. This model can be described by the following:

      Risk  =     1 -exp-                                   (C-ll)

where:

      Risk  =     Excess lifetime cancer risk as a unitless probability
      exp   =     the exponential (2.71828)
      SF    =     Slope factor or cancer potency factor (mg/kg/day)"1
      GDI  =     Chronic daily intake averaged  over a lifetime (mg/kg/day)
                                   C-8

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Where the risks are low (Risk <  10~3), it can generally be assumed that the
dose-response relationship will be in the linear low-dose portion of the  multi-
stage model dose-response curve. Under this assumption, the slope factor is a
constant and risk is related directly  to intake.  This can be described by:

      Risk  =    SF x GDI                                          (C-12)

ESTIMATING CANCER RISKS CAUSED BY
EXPOSURE TO MULTIPLE CARCINOGENS

Exposure situations may involve the potential exposure to more than one
carcinogen. To assess the potential for carcinogenic effects posed by exposure
to multiple carcinogens, it is assumed  in the absence  of information on
synergistic or antagonistic effects that  carcinogenic  risks are additive. This
approach is based on Guidelines for Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures
(U.S. EPA 1986a) and Guidelines for Cancer Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA 1986b).
For estimating cancer risks from exposure to multiple carcinogens from a single
exposure route, the following equation is used:

                  N
      RiskT  =    z Riskj                                             (C-13)
                 i = 1
where:
      RiskT =      Total cancer risk from route of exposure
      Risk; =      Cancer risk for the ith chemical
                                   C-9

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


             NONCARCINOGENIC RISK ESTIMATION

COMPARISON OF INTAKE TO REFERENCE DOSE

The potential for noncancer health effects from exposure to a contaminant is
evaluated by comparing an exposure level over a specified time period with a
reference dose (RfD) for a similar  time period. This ratio of exposure to
toxicity is called a hazard quotient and is described below:

      HQ   =    E * RfD                                        (C-14)

where:

      HQ   =    Noncancer hazard quotient
      E     =    Exposure level (or intake in mg/kg/day)
      RfD  =    Reference dose (mg/kg/day)

This comparison can be interpreted as follows:

      HQ i 1     Potential for health effects                         (C-15)

      HQ < 1    Health effects  not anticipated                      (C-16)

HAZARD INDEX APPROACH

Exposure situations may involve the potential exposure to more than one
chemical.  To assess the potential for noncarcinogenic effects posed by multiple
chemicals, a "hazard index" approach can be used.  This approach, which is
based on Guidelines for Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures (U.S. EPA
1986a), assumes dose additivity and sums the ratios of the daily intakes of
                                  C-10

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

individual chemicals to their reference doses.  This sum is called the hazard
index (HI).

      HI    =     E1/RfD1 + E2/RfD2+ ... Ei/RfDi                    (C-17)

where:

      HI    =     Hazard index
      Ej     =     Daily intake of the ith chemical (mg/kg/day)
      RfDj  =     Reference dose of the ith chemical (mg/kg/day)

When the hazard index exceeds unity, it is a numerical indicator of the transition
between acceptable and unacceptable exposure levels and there may be concern
for potential health effects.  Any single chemical with an estimated daily intake
greater  than the corresponding reference dose will cause the hazard index to
exceed unity.

For multiple chemical exposures, the hazard index can exceed unity even if no
single chemical exposure  exceeds the reference dose for that chemical.  The
assumption of additivity is most properly applied to chemicals that induce the
same effect by the same  mechanism or in the  same target organ.  If the hazard
index is near or exceeds  unity, the chemicals in the mixture  are segregated by
critical effect or target organ and separated indexes are derived for each effect
or target organ.  If any of these separate  indexes exceed unity, then there may
be  a concern for potential health effects.  Chemicals that are essential nutrients
are excluded from the index when in the range of essentiality.
                                    C-ll

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT


               VOLATILE EMISSION CALCULATIONS

The model used to estimate volatile emissions is based on a model for
estimating volatile releases from covered landfills (without internal gas
generation) containing toxic materials developed by Farmer and later modified
(U.S. EPA 1988). Diffusion to the atmosphere is assumed to occur from a
planar  surface within the landfill using Pick's Law of steady-state diffusion.
Processes such as biodegradation, transport in water, adsorption, and landfill gas
production are ignored by the calculation.  The modified equation used to
describe the volatilization is:

       Ef     =     Dj * Csi * A * Ps * M,/^                          (C-18)

where:

       Ej     =     emission rate of compound i (g/s)

       Dj     =     diffusion coefficient of compound i (cm2/s)

       Csi    =     saturated vapor concentration of compound  i (g/cm3)

       A     =     exposed area (An2)

       Ps     =     the ratio of air-filled soil porosity to total soil porosity
                   (dimensionless)

       Mj    =     weight fraction of compound i in the waste (g/g)

       dx    =     effective depth of soil cover  (cm)
                                   C-12

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

The soil moisture may be accounted for by replacing the total soil porosity with
a porosity ratio term.  This ratio is defined as:

      Ps     =     Pa10/3/Pt2                                             (C-19)

where:

      P,     =     total soil porosity (dimensionless)
      Pa     =     the air-filled soil porosity  (dimensionless)

The total  soil porosity and the air-filled porosity are computed once the soil
types are  defined.  In the rare case where the soil is completely dry, the air-
filled porosity becomes the total soil porosity,  and Ps becomes P,4/3. This  occurs
in the original formulation of equation C-18.  The total soil porosity is calculated
as:

      Pt     =      1.0 - (B/p)                                          (C-20)

where:

      B     =      bulk density of the soil  (g/cm3)
      p     =      particle density (g/cm3); 2.65 for mineral material

The air-filled porosity, Pa,  can be calculated using the total soil  porosity minus
the field capacity for water of the soil.  The equation for computing air-filled
porosity is:
       Pa     =     Pt-e
                                     C-13

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

where:

      0      =     percent field capacity for water of soil (dimensionless)

If the diffusion coefficient for the chemical is unknown, it can be calculated
using Fuller's method given by Perry and Chilton:
      D.     =     (O.Q1 * T1-75 q/Mw. +       ^                     (C_22)
                           ((I V,)-333) + (I
where:

      Dj     =     diffusion coefficient of compound i (cm2/s)

      T     =     annual average air temperature (°K)

      MWj  =     molecular weight of compound i (g/mol)

      MWair =     molecular weight of air (328.8) (g/mol)

             =     atmospheric pressure of site (atm)

             =     molecular diffusion volume of toxic substance
       £Va   =     molecular diffusion volume of air (20.1)             (cm3/
                                                                    mole)
The molecular weight and volume of a compound are needed to compute the
vapor concentration (Csi) using the following:
                                   C-14

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

                  VP *
                  Vri
                    R * T
                                                                    CC-23")
                  saturated vapor concentration of compound i (g/cm3)

where:
            =    saturated vapor pressure of the compound i (mm Hg)
            =    molecular weight of compound i (g/mole)
      R    =    molar gas constant (6.23 x 104 cm3 mm Hg/°K mole)
      T    =    annual average air temperature (°K)

Since the saturated vapor concentration of the compound in the soil is used, this
assumes that contaminant concentrations are constant throughout the soil layer.
This assumption provides an upper limit  for the volatilization rate.

ONSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS

Equation C-18 was used to estimate emissions from the Phase  I landfill.  The
surface area of the Phase I  landfill is approximately 167,000 m2.  Based on test
pit data, average depth to contamination is about 420 cm. Table C-l
summarizes the input to this calculation and estimate of emissions. Contaminant
source concentrations are based on the test pit samples.  An upper 95th
percentile confidence limit on the  arithmetic mean of test pit samples was used
to describe the source term for volatilization (Table C-l).  One-half the
detection limit was used for samples where a chemical was not detected.
Chemicals which were detected in less than 10 percent of the test pit samples
were not included in the emissions estimate.
                                   C-15

-------
                                               Table C-1
                                            TEST PIT DATA
                                            G & H LANDFILL
Chemical
(ug/kg)
1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYLBENZENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
Arithmetic
Average
434357
23201
97423
14815
3510
3690
572894
30660
1496292
144892
1931249
Highest No. No.
Detected Samples Nondetects
15000000
180000
1800000
190000
70000
70000
6300000
930000
15000000
3100000
29000000
39
33
39
37
39
39
37
39
31
39
39
26
9
33
23
33
35
6
32
2
24
5
Standard
Deviation
2367775
39031
334306
35774
11206
11288
1320581
147160
3211355
525455
5498815
Upper 95th
Limit
1177486
36518
202345
26342
7027
7232
998414
76847
2626773
309807
3657058
NOTES:  One-half the detection limit used for samples where a chemicals concentration was listed as
         nondetected in estimating the arithmetic mean concentration.

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Although there is no generally accepted methodology for estimating onsite
concentration from an area source, onsite air concentration was estimated based
on the "box model" approach (U.S. EPA 1986c):

      C     =     Q/(LS * V * H)                                   (C-24)

where:

      H    =     mixing height (2 meters)

      V    =     average wind speed with mixing zone

            =     0.5 times wind speed at mixing height

      LS   =     width dimension of contaminated area perpendicular to the
                  wind  direction

The mixing width for the  box model was assumed to be 230  m, and the mixing
height was assumed to be 2 m. A wind speed of 5.9 m/s was assumed based on
onsite air monitoring  data. The estimates of volatilization and onsite
concentration are presented in Table C-2.   It was assumed the wind always blew
out of the west.

OFFSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS

The ambient air concentration at  a distance of 300 meters downward  of Phase I
landfill was estimated by a centerline of a plume directly downwind from the
source using Turner's method (U.S. EPA 1988).  It is based  on:
                                                                    (E-25)
                                   C-16

-------
                                                                         Table C-2
                                            ESTIMATION OF ONSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS FROM VOLATILIZATION
                                                                    G & H LANDFILL SITE
G&H VOLATILE EMISSION CALCULATIONS
COMPOUND
1 ,2-Dichloroethene *
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene
Parameters Used to Calculated VolitilizarJon:
Ambient Temperature (C)
Absolute Pressure (atmospheres)
Soil Bulk Density (g/cm3)
Particle Density (g/cm3)
Moisture Filled Porosity
Total Porosity
Air Filled Porosity
Ratio of Air Filled to Total Porosity
Surface Area of contaminated zone (m2)
Depth of Soil Cover (cm)
Parameters Used to Calculated Airborne Concentration:
Average Wind Speed (m/s)
Minimum Area Width (m)
Mixing Height (m)
(I) (D (I) (I)
Concen-
(I/C)
tration Molecular Atomic Vapor Diffusion
in soil Weight Diffusion Pressure Coefficient
CAS# (rag/kg) (g/mol) Volume (mm Hg) (cm2/sec.)
540-59-0 1,177.49 97.00 79.96 276.00
78-93-3 36.52 72.00 87.32 77.50
108-10-1 202.34 100.00 128.24 6.00
71-43-2 26.34 78.0 90.68 7.60E+01
56-23-5 7.03 154.00 94.50 90.00
67-66-3 7.23 120.00 76.89 160.00
100-41-4 998.41 106.00 151.80 7.00
127-18-4 76.85 166.00 111.00 14.00
108-88-3 2,626.77 92.0 111.14 2.81E+01
79-01-6 309.81 131.00 93.48 60.00
1330-20-7 3,657.06 106.0 131.60 l.OOE+01

10 (I) Typical subsurface temperatue is 10 degrees C.
1.00 (I) Use 1.0
1.61 (I) Typical range is 1 .0 to 2.0
2.65 (I) 2.65 is representative of average density material
0. 10 (I) Range 0 to 1 .0 but must be less than Total Porosity
0.39 (C) As a check this should be between 0.33 and 0.55
0.29 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
0. 1 1 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
167000 (I) Site specific
418 (I) Site specific

5.90 (I) Site specific (3 m/s can be used as a conservative estimate]
230.00 (I) Site specific
2.00 (I) Use 2 m for on-site calculations
0.08391
0.08409
0.06854
0.08187
0.07493
0.08337
0.06327
0.06961
0.07359
0.07630
0.06735















(C)
Saturated
Vapor
Cone.
(g/crn3)
1.52E-03
3.16E-04
3.40E-05
3.36E-04
7.85E-04
1.09E-03
4.20E-05
1.32E-04
1.46E-04
4.45E-04
6.01E-05















(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
per cm2)
3.87E-07
2.50E-09
1.22E-09
1.87E-09
1.07E-09
1.69E-09
6.85E-09
1.82E-09
7.30E-08
2.72E-08
3.82E-08















(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
from Area
6.46E-02
4.18E-04
2.03E-04
3.12E-04
1.78E-04
2.82E-04
1.14E-03
3.03E-04
1.22E-02
4.53E-03
6.37E-03















(C)
Airborne
Cone.
On-site
(rag/mS)
4.76E-02
3.08E-04
1.50E-04
2.30E-04
1.31E-04
2.08E-04
8.43E-04
2.24E-04
8.99E-03
3.34E-03
4.70E-03















(I)   Indicates value must be input by user.
(C)  Indicates value is calculated by spreadsheet.
(I/C) Indicates value may be input by user or calculated by the spreadsheet.
*   Vapor pressure:  average of trans- and cis- at 25C.

-------
                                                 AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

where:

      C(X)  =     concentration of substance at distance x from site (mass/
                   volume
      Q     =     release rate of substance from site (mass/time)
      dy     =     dispersion coefficient in the lateral (crosswind) direction
                   (distance)
      dz     =     dispersion coefficient in the vertical direction
      y     =     mean wind speed (distance/time)
      •n     =     the value pi  = 3.14

A stability class of D was assumed.  The results are presented in Table C-3.

The Turner method is for  point sources.  For area sources such as the landfill a
virtual point source distance  must be estimated using:

                    S
       fly           	
                   4.3

where:

      S     =     LS in  equation C-24

The distance to the virtual point source is estimated  by looking up the estimated
oy on a graph of horizontal dispersion  coefficient as a function of downwind
distance from the source (see Figure 3-5, Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual,
U.S. EPA 1988).  The distance to the  virtual point source and the actual
distance to  the receptor location are summed and substituted as a distance from
the virtual source to the receptor.
                                    C-17

-------
                                                                       Table C-3
                                            ESTIMATION OF OFFSITE AIR CONCENTRATIONS-VOLATILIZATION
                                                                 G & H LANDFILL SITE
O&H VOLATILE EMISSION CALCULATIONS
COMPOUND
1 ,2-Dichloroethene *
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Xylene
Parameters Used to Calculated Volitilization:
Ambient Temperature (C)
Absolute Pressure (atmospheres)
Soil Bulk Density (g/cm3)
Particle Density (g/cm3)
Moisture Filled Porosity
Total Porosity
Air Filled Porosity
Ratio of Air Filled to Total Porosity
Surface Area of contaminated zone (m2)
Depth of Soil Cover (cm)
Parameters Used to Calculated Airborne Concentration:
Average Wind Speed (m/s)
Minimum Area Width (m)
Mixing Height (m)
Stability Class
Receptor Distance Downwind (X) (km)
Distance to virtual point source (Xy)
Virtual Distance to Receptor (X + Xy)
Lateral Dispersion Coefficient (sigma y) (m)
Vertical Dispersion Coefficient (sigma z) (m)
Fraction of Time Wind Blows Toward Receptor
(I) (I) (I) (I) (I/C) (C)
Concen- Saturated
tration Molecular Atomic Vapor Diffusion Vapor
in soil Weight Diffusion Pressure Coefficient Cone.
CASl (rug/kg) (g/raol) Volume (mm Hg) (cra2/sec.) (g/cm3)
540-59-0 1,177.49 97.00 79.96 276.00 0.08391 I.52E-03
78-93-3 36.52 72.00 87.32 77.50 0.08409 3.16E-04
108-10-1 202.34 100.00 128.24 6.00 0.06854 3.40E-05
7143-2 26.34 78.0 90.68 7.60E+01 0.08187 3.36E-04
56-23-5 7.03 154.00 94.50 90.00 0.07493 7.85E-04
67-66-3 7.23 120.00 76.89 160.00 0.08337 1.09E-03
100-41-4 998.41 106.00 151.80 7.00 0.06327 4.20E-05
127-18-4 76.85 166.00 111.00 14.00 0.06961 1.32E-04
108-88-3 2,626.77 92.0 111.14 2.81E+01 0.07359 1.46E-04
79-01-6 309.81 131.00 93.48 60.00 0.07630 4.45E-04
1330-20-7 3,657.06 106.0 131.60 l.OOE+01 0.06735 6.01E-05
10 (I) Typical subsurface temperatue is 10 degrees C.
1.00 (I) Use 1.0
1 .61 (I) Typical range is 1 .0 to 2.0
2.65 (I) 2.65 is representative of average density material
0. 10 (I) Range 0 to 1 .0 but must be less than Total Porosity
0.39 (C) As a check this should be between 0.33 and 0.55
0.29 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
0. 1 1 (C) Calculated by spreadsheet
334000 (I) Site specific
418 (I) Site specific
(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
per cm2)
3.87E-07
2.50E-09
1.22E-09
1.87E-09
1.07E-09
1.69E-09
6.85E-09
1.82E-09
7.30E-08
2.72E-08
3.82E-08

(C)
Emission
Rate
(g/sec.
from Area
1.29E-01
8.36E-04
4.06E-04
6.24E-04
3.56E-04
5.65E-04
2.29E-03
6.07E-04
2.44E-02
9.07E-03
1.27E-02

(C)
Airborne
Cone.
On-site
(mg/m3)
9.51E-02
6.16E-04
2.99E-04
4.60E-04
2.63E-04
4.16E-04
1.69E-03
4.47E-04
1.80E-02
6.68E-03
9.39E-03

(C)
Airborne
Cone, at
Distance
(mg/ra3)
2.46E-03
1.59EX)5
7.73E-06
1.19E-05
6.78E-06
1.07E-05
4.35E-05
1.15E-05
4.64E-04
1.73E-04
2.42E-04

5.90 (I) Site specific (3 m/s can be used as a conservative estimate)
230.00 (I) Site specific
2.00 (I) Use 2 m for on-site calculations
D Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
0.30 Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
53.50 Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
53.50 Not used in spreadsheet, but used to estimate dispersion coefficients
81.00 (I) See pp 3-14 and 3-15 of Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual (Versar, 1987)
35.00 (I) See pp 3-14 and 3-15 of Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual (Versar, 1987)
1.00 (I) Site specific (.3 can be used as a conservative upper bound)
(I)   Indicates value must be input by user.
(C)   Indicates value is calculated by spreadsheet.
(I/C) Indicates value may be input by user or calculated by the spreadsheet.
*   Vapor pressure: average of trans- and cis- at 25C.

-------
                                               AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

This method assumes a square or rectangular source.  The landfill is a triangular
area.  This is conservatively compensated for by doubling the landfill area,
essentially created a rectangular area source. This would overestimate the
emissions.
GLT959/009.50
                                   C-18

-------
                           Appendix D
                      RISK CALCULATIONS
GLT959/020.50-4

-------
                                                  Table 0-1
                                             G  &  H LANDFILL  SITE
                                     ONSITE  VISITOR (CHILD)  -   SURFACE  SOIL
                             NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION  - SOIL  INGESTION
                               Reference                            Daily Intake     Hazard
                              Dose (RfD)             Concentration           (DI)   Quotient   Does Intake
Chemical                       mg/kg-day   Source  a           ug/kg      mg/kg-day     DI/RfD   Exceed RfD?
_._................._..__...._.._....*............................A.............._..__.__._....._.._._....
Naphthalene                          0.4    HEAST              1200         0.0000      0.000        NO

Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)                                                          0.000

EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting             Site Visitor
Exposed individual                 Adult
Soil intake (grams/day)              0.1
Body weight (kilograms)               35

a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment  Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment  Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA  1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.

-------
                                                  Table D-2
                                            G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                    ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT) -  SURFACE  SOIL
                             NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION  - SOIL  INGESTION
                               Reference                            Daily Intake      Hazard
                              Dose (RfD)             Concentration          (DI)   Quotient   Does  Intake
Chemical                       mg/kg-day   Source a          ug/kg    mg/kg-day      DI/RfD   Exceed RfD?

Naphthalene                          0.4    HEAST             1200        0.0000      0.000         NO

Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)                                                         0.000

EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting             Site Visitor
Exposed individual                 Adult
Soil intake (grams/day)              0.1
Body weight (kilograms)               70

a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.

-------
                                                    Table D-3
                                G & H LANDFILL SITE -  ONSITE VISITOR SURFACE SOIL
                                  EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK -  SOIL INGEST ION
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen Slope Factor
Chemical Classification (kg -day/ ing)
BenzoCa] anthracene
Benzo [b] f I uoranthene
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo [g,h,i] per lyene
Chyrsene
I ndeno C 1 , 2 , 3 - cd] py rene
PCB
SUM OF RISKS
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Soil ingest ion rate (g/day)
Body weight (kg)
Number of days/years exposed
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average soil intake
(g/kg body weight per day)
82
B2
B2
B2
B2
C
B2
B2


Site Visitor
0.1
70
25
5
70
0.000007
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
7.7


Source
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
HEAST(v)


Lifetime Average Excess
Concentration Chemical Intake Lifetime
ug/kg mg/kg-day Cancer Risk
7700
9000
8500
6300
4600
8000
4.800E+03
1.730E+03


5.382E-08
6.290E-08
5.941E-08
4.403E-08
3.215E-08
5.591E-08
3.355E-08
1.209E-08


6E-07
7E-07
7E-07
5E-07
4E-07
6E-07
4E-07
9E-08
4E-06

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.   Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene.  Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
   U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk  of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.   U.S.  EPA 1988.

-------
                                                  Table D-4
                                   SITE VISITOR (CHILD) - OIL SEEP SEDIMENT
                             NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
                                              G & H LANDFILL SITE

Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Phenol
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sun of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.6
0.3
2


Site Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST(v)
IRIS
IRIS






ug/kg
125000
15000
23200
10000
15300
1870
189000






mg/kg-day
0.0004
0.0000
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0005






Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.018
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.019





NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO






   Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
   Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
   Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                  Table D-5
                                   SITE VISITOR (ADULT)- OIL  SEEP SEDIMENT
                             NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH  RISK EVALUATION -  SOIL INGESTION
                                              G & H  LANDFILL  SITE

Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Phenol
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.6
0.3
2


Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST(v)
IRIS
IRIS


ug/kg
125000
15000
23200
10000
15300
1870
189000


mg/kg-day
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003


Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.010

NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO


Site Visitor
Adult
0.1
70















a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                    Table D-6
                                        SITE VISITOR - OIL SEEP SEDIMENT
                                  EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGESTION
                                               G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
       U.S.EPA
    Carcinogen
Classification
Slope Factor
 (kg-day/mg)
                                                               Source
              Lifetime Average        Excess
Concentration  Chemical Intake      Lifetime
        ug/kg        mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk
Aroclor 1254
Benzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
N-N i t rosodiphenyIami ne
            82
             A
            82
            82
         7.7  HEAST(v)
       0.029      IRIS
       O.OU      IRIS
      0.0049      IRIS
        65600
         4600
       125000
    2.700E+04
4.585E-07
3.215E-08
8.736E-07
1.887E-07
4E-06
9E-10
1E-08
9E-10
SUM OF RISKS
                                                                                                                4E-06
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting               Site Visitor
Soil ingest ion rate (g/day)             0.1
Body weight (kg)                         70
Number of days/years exposed             25
Number of years exposed                   5
Years in lifetime                        70
Lifetime average soil intake       0.000007
(g/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
   U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.   U.S. EPA 1988.

-------
                                                  Table D-7
                          SITE VISITOR (CHILD) -  SEDIMENTS ONSITE PONDS AND DITCHES
                           NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGEST ION
                                            G & H LANDFILL SITE

Chemical
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Methylphenol
Phenol
Toluene
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
4
0.02
0.5
0.6
0.3


Site Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST(v)
IRIS






ug/kg
3350
537
685
480
16






mg/kg-day
0.000010
0.000002
0.000002
0.000001
0.000000






Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000002
0.000077
0.000004
0.000002
0.000000
0.000085





NO
NO
NO
NO
NO






   Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
   Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
   Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG.  See HEAST.

-------
                                                  Table D-8
                          SITE VISITOR (ADULT) - SEDIMENTS ONSITE PONDS AND DITCHES
                           NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION -  SOIL INGESTION
                                            G & H LANDFILL SITE

Chemical
Benzoic acid
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
4 -Methyl phenol
Phenol
Toluene
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfO)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
4
0.02
0.5
0.6
0.3


Site Visitor
Adult
0.1
70
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
. Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST(v)
IRIS






ug/kg
3350
537
685
480
16






mg/kg-day
0.000005
0.000001
0.000001
0.000001
0.000000






Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000001
0.000038
0.000002
0.000001
0.000000
0.000043





NO
NO
NO
NO
NO






   Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
   Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
   Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                    Table D-9
                                 SITE VISITOR -  SEDIMENT ONSITE PONDS AND  DITCHES
                                   EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGESTION
                                               G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
                                    U.S.EPA
                                 Carcinogen
                             Classification
      Slope Factor
       (kg-day/mg)
                                                               Source
                                 Lifetime Average        Excess
                   Concentration  Chemical Intake      Lifetime
                           ug/kg        mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk
Aroclor 1254
Benzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
B2
 A
B2
  7.7
0.029
0.014
HEAST(v)
    IRIS
    IRIS
682
  8
537
4.767E-09
5.591E-11
3.753E-09
4E-08
2E-12
5E-11
SUM OF RISKS
                                                                                                                4E-08
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting               Site Visitor
Soil ingestion rate (g/day)             0.1
Body weight (kg)                         70
Number of days/years exposed             25
Number of years exposed                   5
Years in lifetime                        70
Lifetime average soil intake       0.000007
(g/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene.  Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
   U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk  of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.   U.S.  EPA 1988.

-------
                                                  Table D-10
                          ONSITE VISITOR (CHILD) - SEDIMENT CLINTON KALAMAZOO CANAL
                           NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
                                             G & H LANDFILL SITE

Chemical
Barium
Benzoic acid
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Nickel
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
4
0.005
0.02
0.2
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.02
0.007
0.2


Site Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
c
HEAST
HEAST






ug/kg
39000
180
130
520
99
9600
9600
14100
28
10400
14000
38900






mg/kg-day
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001






Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.006
0.001
0.017





NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO






a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed NCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                  Table D-11
                          ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT) - SEDIMENT CLINTON KALAMAZOO CANAL
                           NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGESTION
                                             G & H LANDFILL SITE

Chemical
Barium
Benzoic acid
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Nickel
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
4
0.005
0.02
0.2
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.02
0.007
0.2


Site Visitor
Adult
0.1
70
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
c
HEAST
HEAST






ug/kg
39000
180
130
520
99
9600
9600
14100
28
10400
14000
38900






mg/kg-day
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001






Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.008





NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO






a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                   Table 0-12
SITE VISITOR - SEDIMENT CLINTON KALAMAZOO CANAL
 EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - SOIL INGESTION
              G & H LANDFILL SITE
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen Slope Factor
Chemical Classification (kg-day/mg)
Arsenic A 2
Benzo [a] anthracene B2 11.5
Benzo [blfluoranthene B2 11.5
Benzo [k]f luoranthene B2 11.5
Benzo [a] pyrene 82 11.5
Benzo [g,h,i] per lyene B2 11.5
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate B2 0.014
Chyrsene C 11.5
DOE B2 0.34
Indenot1,2,3-cd]pyrene B2 11.5
SUM OF RISKS
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site Visitor
Soil ingest ion rate (g/day) 0.1
Body weight (kg) 70
Number of days/years exposed 25
Number of years exposed 5
Years in lifetime 70
Lifetime average soil intake 0.000007
(g/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA


Source
c
b
b
b
b
b
IRIS
b
IRIS
b












1989

Concentration
ug/kg
3900
150
260
260
150
78
520
200
28
7.000E+01













Lifetime Average
Chemical Intake
mg/kg-day
2.726E-08
1.048E-09
1.817E-09
1.817E-09
1.048E-09
5.451E-10
3.634E-09
1.398E-09
1.957E-10
4.892E-10













Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
5E-08
1E-08
2E-08
2E-08
1E-08
6E-09
5E-11
2E-08
7E-11
6E-09
1E-07












HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo [a] pyrene. Benzo Ca] pyrene potency
U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1

. U.S
from Ambient Water Quality Criteria

. EPA 1988.


Document .



-------
                                                  Table D-13
                             ONSITE VISITOR (CHILD) - SEDIMENTS OFFSITE DITCHES
                          NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - SOIL INGEST ION
Reference
Dose (RfD)
Chemical tng/kg-day
Barium
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Chloroform
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Di butyl phthalate
Manganese
Mercury (alkyl and inorganic)
Nickel
Selenium
Toluene
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
0.05
0.005
0.02
0.2
0.0005
0.01
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.1
0.2
0.0003
0.02
0.003
0.3
0.007
0.2


Visitor
Child
0.1
35
Daily Intake Hazard
Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
c
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST






ug/kg
125000
2200
1229
178
3000
3
4900
4900
8300
34
187
688000
230
36000
3200
87
27000
268000






mg/kg-day
0.0004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0020
0.0000
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001
0.0008






DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.007
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.017
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.000
0.011
0.004
0.064





NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO






   Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
   Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
   Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                  Table D-14
                             ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT) - SEDIMENTS OFFSITE  DITCHES
                          NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION -  SOIL  INGESTION
Reference
Dose (RfD)
Chemical mg/kg-day
Barium
Beryllium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Chloroform
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
DDT
Di butyl phthalate
Manganese
Mercury (alkyl and inorganic)
Nickel
Selenium
Toluene
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting Site
Exposed individual
Soil intake (grams/day)
Body weight (kilograms)
0.05
0.005
0.02
0.2
0.0005
0.01
1
0.005
0.037
0.0005
0.1
0.2
0.0003
0.02
0.003
0.3
0.007
0.2


Visitor
Adult
0.1
70
Daily Intake
Concentration (DI)
Source a
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
d
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
c
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST






ug/kg
125000
2200
1229
178
3000
3
4900
4900
8300
34
187
688000
230
36000
3200
87
27000
268000






mg/kg-day
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0010
0.0000
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
. 0.0004






Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.004
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.000
0.006
0.002
0.032





NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO






   Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
   Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
   Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                    Table D-15
                                   ONSITE VISITOR -  SEDIMENTS OFF  SITE  DITCHES
                                               G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                  EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK -  SOIL  INGESTION


Chemical
Arsenic
Benzo Ca] anthracene
Benzo Cb] f I uoranthene
Benzo [k] f I uoranthene
Benzo [a] pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perlyene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chloroform
Chyrsene
DDT
Dibenz [a, h] anthracene
Indenod ,2, 3-cd] pyrene
SUM OF RISKS
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Soil ingestion rate (g/day)
Body weight (kg)
Number of days/years exposed
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average soil intake
(g/kg body weight per day)
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
A
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
B2
82
C
B2
B2
B2


Site Visitor
0.1
70
25
5
70
0.000007

Lifetime Average
Slope Factor
(kg-day/mg)
2
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
0.014
0.0061
11.5
0.34
11.5
11.5










Concentration Chemical Intake
Source
c
b
b
b
b
b
IRIS
IRIS
b
IRIS
b
b










ug/kg
8700
494
965
965
475
435
1229
3
573
34
1 .860E+02
2.760E+02










mg/kg-day
6.081E-08
3.453E-09
6.744E-09
6.744E-09
3.320E-09
3.040E-09
8.590E-09
2.097E-11
4.005E-09
2.376E-10
1.300E-09
1.929E-09










Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
1E-07
4E-08
8E-08
8E-08
4E-08
3E-08
1E-10
1E-13
5E-08
8E-11
1E-08
2E-08
5E-07









a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene.  Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
   U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk  of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.   U.S.  EPA 1988.

-------
                                                Table D-16
                              SITE VISITOR (CHILD) - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
                         NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION
                                            G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Receptor
Water Intake (I/day)
Body Weight (kg)
Reference Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Concentration (DI) Quotient
mg/kg-day Source a ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD
0.02 IRIS
0.2 HEAST
0.3 IRIS
2 IRIS


Site Visitor
Child
0.05
35
1301000 1.8586 92.929
363000 0.5186 2.593
1300 0.0019 0.006
5000 0.0071 0.004
95.531

Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
YES
YES
NO
NO


   Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
   Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
   Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                               Table D-17
                             SITE  VISITOR (ADULT)  -  OIL  SEEP  SURFACE  WATER
                        NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH  RISK  EVALUATION  -  WATER  INGESTION
                                          G & H LANDFILL SITE
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of OI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Receptor
Water Intake (I/day)
Body Weight (kg)
Reference Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Concentration (DI) Quotient
mg/kg-day Source a ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD
0.02 IRIS
0.2 HEAST
0.3 IRIS
2 IRIS


Site Visitor
Adult
0.05
70
1301000 0.9293 46.464
363000 0.2593 1.296
1300 0.0009 0.003
5000 0.0036 0.002
47.766

Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
YES
YES
NO
NO


a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                       Table D-18
                                        ONSITE VISITOR - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
                                                  G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                     EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST I ON
Chemical
      U.S. EPA
    Carcinogen
Classification
Slope Factor
 (kg-day/mg)
                                                                   Source
            Concentration
                     ug/l
         Lifetime Average
          Chemical Intake
                mg/kg-day
                                                                                                                     Excess
                                                                                                                   Lifetime
                                                                                                                Cancer  Risk
Aroclor 1254
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
            82
            B2
         7.7
       0.014
HEAST(v)
    IRIS
 435000
1301000
1.216E-05
3.637E-05
9E-05
5E-07
SUM OF RISKS
                                                                                                                     9E-05
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting                 Site Visitor

Daily water intake (I/day)               0.05
Body weight (kg)                           70
Number of days/year exposed                 1
Number of years exposed                     1
Averaging time: lifetime(yrs)              70
Lifetime average water intake      0.00000003
 (I/kg body weight per day)
a. Sources of Slope Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzoCaJpyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene slope factor from Ambient Water Quality
   Criteria Document.  U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.

-------
                                                      Table D-19
                                 ONSITE  VISITOR  (CHILD)  -  OIL  SEEP SURFACE  WATER
                                                 G &  H LANDFILL  SITE
                       NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH  RISK EVALUATION  -  DERMAL  ABSORPTION  FROM WATER
Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl ph thai ate
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) =
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Exposed Individual
Body weight (kg)
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Hazard
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration (DI) Quotient Does Intake
mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.02 IRIS 0.0008
0.2 HE AST 0.0008
0.3 IRIS 0.0008
2 IRIS 0.0008


Site Visitor
Child
35
18000
75
0.1
1303000 0.0402 2.010 YES
363000 0.0112 0.056 NO
1300 0.0000 0.000 NO
5000 0.0002 0.000 NO
2.067

Based on ingestion RfDs.   Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA  1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989.
awaiting entry into IRIS.
Verified value

-------
                                                         Table D-20
                                     ONSITE VISITOR (ADULT)  -  OIL  SEEP  SURFACE WATER
                                                    G & H LANDFILL SITE
                           NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION  - DERMAL ABSORPTION FROM WATER


Chemical
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Toluene
Xylenes
Reference
Dose (RfD)
nog/ kg -day
0.02
0.2
0.3
2
Permeabi I i ty
Constant Concentration
Source a
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
cm/hr
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
ug/l
1303000
363000
1300
5000
Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0201
0.0056
0.0000
0.0001
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
1.005
0.028
0.000
0.000

Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
YES
NO
NO
NO
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD) =

EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure Setting                 Site Visitor
Exposed Individual                     Adult

Body weight (kg)                          70
Surface area (cm2)                     18000
Percent submerged                         75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.1
                                                                                                        1.033
   Based on ingestion RfDs.  Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA  1989.
   awaiting entry into IRIS.
Verified value

-------
                                                               Table D-21
                                                ONSITE VISITOR - OIL SEEP SURFACE WATER
                                                          G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                       EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - DERMAL ABSORPTION FROM WATER
                                       U.S. EPA                               Permeability                 Lifetime Average        Excess
                                     Carcinogen     Slope Factor           a     Constant  Concentration   Chemical Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                         Classification      (kg-day/mg)    Source          cm/hr           ug/l         mg/kg-day   Cancer  Risk

Aroclor 1254                                 B2              7.7  HEAST(v)      8.000E-04         435000         6.567E-07        5E-06
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate                   B2            0.014      IRIS      8.000E-04        1301000         1.964E-06        3E-08

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                     5E-06


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure Setting
Exposed Individual
Body weight (kg)                             70
Surface area (cm2)                        18000
Percent submerged (interger)                 75
Time in water (hrs/day)                    0.25
Number of days per year                       1
Number of years exposed                       1
Averaging time (yrs in lifetime)             70
a. Cancer potency values based on ingestion.  Sources of cancer potency factors:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene slope factor from Ambient Water Quality Criteria
   Document. U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.

-------
                                                                           Table 0-22
                                                         G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-01
                                         NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND  DERMAL  ABSORPTION
                                                                                                       Ingest ion                                Dermal  absorption

                                    Reference            Permeability                     Daily Intake    Hazard                   Daily Intake      Hazard
                                   Dose (RfD)                Constant   Concentration             (DI)  Quotient   Does Intake             (DI)    Quotient  Does  Intake
Chemical                            mg/kg-day   Source a        cm/hr            ug/l        mg/kg-day    DI/RfD   Exceed RfD?        mg/kg-day      DI/RfD  Exceed RfD?

1,1-Dichloroethane                      0.009     IRIS         0.0008               3           0.0001     0.010       NO                0.0000      0.000       NO
1,1-Dichloroethene                      0.009     IRIS         0.0008             0.5           0.0000     0.002       NO                0.0000      0.000       NO

Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)                                                                               0.011                                   0.000015


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure Setting                  Residential

General assumptions:

Receptor                                Adult
Body Weight (kg)                           70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Water Intake (I/day)                        2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                      18000
Percent submerged                          75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.25

a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                                                  Table D-23
                                                                   G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-01
                                                     EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                           Ingestion                    Dermal Absorption

                                       U.S.EPA                               Permeability                     Lifetime Average       Excess      Lifetime Average        Excess
                                    Carcinogen     Slope Factor            a     Constant   Concentration      Chemical Intake     Lifetime       Chemical Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                        Classification      (kg-day/mg)     Source          cm/hr            ug/l            mg/kg-day  Cancer Risk             mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

Benzene                                      A            0.029       IRIS      8.000E-04             0.8            2.286E-05        7E-07             3.086E-08         9E-10
1,1-Dichloroethane                          B2            0.091      HEAST      8.000E-04               3            8.571E-05        8E-06             1.157E-07         1E-08
1,1-Dichloroethene                           C              0.6       IRIS      8.000E-04             0.5            1.429E-OS        9E-06             1.929E-08         1E-08
Trichloroethene                             B2            0.011       IRIS      8.000E-04              25            7.143E-04        8E-06             9.643E-07         IE-OS
Vinyl chloride                               A              2.3      HEAST      8.000E-04               2            5.714E-05        1E-04             7.714E-08         2E-07

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                          2E-04                               2E-07


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                   Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                            70
Number of days/year exposed                365
Number of years exposed                     70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)              70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                   2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                       18000
Percent submerged (interger)                75
Time in water (hrs/day)                   0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingest ion                                0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document. U.S.
   EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.

-------
                                                                             Table D-24
                                                            G & H LANDFILL SITE -  RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-02
                                           NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION  - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                       Ingest ion                                Dermal  absorption

                                    Reference            Permeability                     Daily Intake    Hazard                   Daily Intake      Hazard
                                   Dose (RfD)                Constant   Concentration             (DI)  Quotient   Does Intake             (DI)    Quotient  Does  Intake
Chemical                            mg/kg-day   Source a        cm/hr            ug/l        mg/kg-day    DI/RfD   Exceed RfD?        mg/kg-day      DI/RfD  Exceed  RfD?

1,1-Dichloroethane                      0.009     IRIS         0.0008               2           0.0001     0.006       NO                0.0000    0.000009       NO

Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure Setting                  Residential

General assumptions:

Receptor                                Adult
Body Weight (kg)                           70

Ingestion assumptions:

Water Intake (I/day)                        2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                      18000
Percent submerged                          75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.25

a. Sources of RfOs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S.  EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based  on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                                          Table D-25
                                                           G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL  WELL  GR-02
                                               EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION  AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                        Ingestion                    Dermal Absorption

                                   U.S. EPA                               Permeability                     Lifetime Average       Excess      Lifetime Average        Excess
                                 Carcinogen     Slope Factor            a     Constant   Concentration      Chemical  Intake     Lifetime       Chemical Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                     Classification      (kg-day/mg)     Source          cm/hr            ug/l            mg/kg-day  Cancer Risk             mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

1,1-Dichloroethane                       B2            0.091      HEAST      8.000E-04              2            5.7UE-05        5E-06             7.7KE-08         7E-09
Trichloroethene                          B2            0.011       IRIS      8.000E-04              8            2.286E-04        3E-06             3.086E-07         3E-09

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                      8E-06                               1E-08


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                         70
Number of days/year exposed             365
Number of years exposed                  70
Averaging time: lifetime (y              70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                    18000
Percent submerged (interger              75
Time in water (hrs/day)                0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingest ion                             0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S.  EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.   Verified values awaiting entry into  IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
   U.S. EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.   U.S.  EPA 1988.

-------
                                                                               Table D-26
                                                                 G & H LANDFILL - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-03
                                              NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                       Ingest ion                                Dermal  absorption

                                    Reference            Permeability                     Daily Intake    Hazard                   Daily Intake      Hazard
                                   Dose (RfD)                Constant   Concentration             (DI)  Quotient   Does Intake             (DI)    Quotient  Does  Intake
Chemical                            mg/kg-day   Source a        cm/hr            ug/l        mg/kg-day    DI/RfD   Exceed RfD?        mg/kg-day      DI/RfD  Exceed RfD?

1,1-Dichloroethane                      0.009     IRIS         0.0008               1           0.0000     0.003       NO                0.0000      0.000       NO
Xylenes                                     2     IRIS         0.0008             0.9           0.0000     0.000       NO                0.0000      0.000       NO

Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)                                                                               0.003                                   0.000004


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure Setting                  Residential

General assumptions:

Receptor                                Adult
Body Weight (kg)                           70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Water Intake (I/day)                        2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                      18000
Percent submerged                          75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.25

a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                                                  Table D-27
                                                                   G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-03
                                                       EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                            Ingest ion                    Dermal Absorption

                                         U.S. EPA                             Permeability                     Lifetime  Average        Excess     Lifetime Average        Excess
                                       Carcinogen    Slope Factor           a     Constant   Concentration      Chemical Intake      Lifetime     Chemical  Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                           Classification     (kg-day/mg)    Source          cm/hr            ug/l            mg/kg-day   Cancer  Risk           mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

1,1-Dichloroethane                             B2           0.091     HEAST      8.000E-04               1            2.857E-05        3E-06           3.857E-08         4E-09
Trichloroethene                                B2           0.011      IRIS      8.000E-04               1            2.857E-05        3E-07           3.857E-08         4E-10

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                          3E-06                             4E-09


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                      Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                               70
Number of days/year exposed                   365
Number of years exposed                        70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)                 70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                      2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                          18000
Percent submerged (interger)                   75
Time in water (hrs/day)                      0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingestion                                   0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.  U.S.
   EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.

-------
                                                                            Table D-28
                                                            G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-04
                                            NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                       Ingest ion                                Dermal  absorption

                                    Reference            Permeability                     Daily Intake    Hazard                   Daily Intake      Hazard
                                   Dose (RfD)                Constant   Concentration             (DI)  Quotient   Does Intake             (DI)    Quotient  Does  Intake
Chemical                 •          mg/kg-day   Source a        cm/hr            ug/l        mg/kg-day    DI/RfD   Exceed RfD?        mg/kg-day      DI/RfD  Exceed RfD?

1,1-Dichloroethane                      0.009     IRIS         0.0008             0.5           0.0000     0.002       NO                0.0000    0.000002       NO

Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure Setting                  Residential

General assumptions:

Receptor                                Adult
Body Weight (kg)                           70

Ingestion assumptions:

Water Intake (I/day)                        2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                      18000
Percent submerged                          75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.25

a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Cyanide value based on free cyanide.
c. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
d. Copper RfD based on proposed MCLG. See HEAST.

-------
                                                                                Table 0-29
                                                                 G & H LANDFILL - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-04
                                                   EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                            Ingestion                  Dermal Absorption

                                        U.S. EPA                              Permeability                    Lifetime Average       Excess      Lifetime Average        Excess
                                      Carcinogen    Slope Factor            a     Constant   Concentration     Chemical Intake     Lifetime       Chemical  Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                          Classification     (kg-day/mg)     Source          cm/hr            ug/l           mg/kg-day  Cancer  Risk            mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

1,1-Dichloroethane                            B2           0.091      HEAST      8.000E-04             0.5           1.429E-05       1E-06            1.929E-08         2E-09
Vinyl chloride                                 A             2.3      HEAST      8.000E-04               2           5.714E-05       1E-04            7.714E-08         2E-07

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                         1E-04                              2E-07


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                     Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                              70
Number of days/year exposed                  365
Number of years exposed                       70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)                70

Ingestion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                     2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                         18000
Percent submerged (interger)                  75
Time in water (hrs/day)                     0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingestion                                  0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.  U.S.
   EPA 1980.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.

-------
                                                                              Table D-30
                                                        G & H LANDFILL SITE  -  RESIDENTIAL  WELL  GR-13
                                 NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION -  WATER  INGESTION  AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                       Ingestion                                Dermal absorption

                                    Reference            Permeability                     Daily Intake    Hazard                   Daily  Intake      Hazard
                                   Dose (RfD)                Constant   Concentration             (DI)  Quotient   Does  Intake             (DI)    Quotient  Does Intake
Chemical                            mg/kg-day   Source a        cm/hr            ug/l        mg/kg-day    DI/RfD   Exceed RfD?        mg/kg-day      DI/RfD  Exceed RfD?

1,1,1-Trichloroethane                    0.09     IRIS         0.0008               1           0.0000     0.000       NO                 0.0000       0.000       NO

Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)                                                                            0.000317                                   0.000000


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure Setting                  Residential

General assumptions:

Receptor                                Adult
Body Weight (kg)                           70

Ingestion assumptions:

Water Intake (I/day)                        2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                      18000
Percent submerged                          75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.25

a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S.  EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.

-------
                                                          Table D-31
                              G & H LANDFILL SITE - RESIDENTIAL WELL GR-13
                              EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                        Ingest ion                   Dermal Absorption

                                      U.S. EPA                             Permeability                    Lifetime Average       Excess   Lifetime Average       Excess
                                    Carcinogen    Slope Factor           a     Constant   Concentration     Chemical  Intake     Lifetime    Chemical Intake     Lifetime
Chemical                        Classification     (kg-day/mg)    Source          cm/hr            ug/l          mg/kg-day  Cancer Risk          mg/kg-day  Cancer Risk

Trichloroethene                             B2           0.011      IRIS      8.000E-04             0.7          2.000E-05        2E-07          2.700E-08        3E-10

SUM OF RISKS


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                   Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                            70
Number of days/year exposed                365
Number of years exposed                     70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)              70

Ingestion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                   2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                       18000
Percent submerged (interger)                75
Time  in water (hrs/day)                   0.25

Lifetime average media  intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingest ion                                0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
      IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
c. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                                                               Table D-32
                                                                           G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                        MONITORING WELLS - AREA 1
                                              NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION -  WATER INGESTION  AND  DERMAL ABSORPTION



Chemical
Barium
Benzoic acid
2-Butanone
Carbon disulfide
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Dibutyl phthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane
Di ethyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Manganese
4-Methylphenol
Naphthalene
Nickel
Phenol
Silver
Vanadium
Xylenes
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:

Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
4
0.05
0.1
1
O.OOS
0.1
0.009
0.8
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.02
0.6
0.003
0.007
Z
0.2


Residential

Adult
70




Source
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST
b
HEAST(v)
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
HEAST








Permeabi I i ty
Constant
a cm/hr
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008









Concentration c
ug/l
900.3
218.5
536.7
95.1
5.9
5.9
47.9
98.6
14.2
337.5
342.7
69.9
109.8
29.6
15.7
5.2
23.5
6659.4
857.7








Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0257
0.0062
0.0153
0.0027
0.0002
0.0002
0.0014
0.0028
0.0004
0.0096
0.0098
0.0020
0.0031
0.0008
0.0004
0.0001
0.0007
0.1903
0.0245







Ingest ion
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.514
0.002
0.307
0.027
0.000
0.034
0.014
0.313
0.001
0.096
0.049
0.004
0.008
0.042
0.001
0.050
0.096
0.095
0.123
1.774








Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO








Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003
0.0000







Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does


Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002






NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO







Water Intake (I/day)

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                                                               Table D-32
                                                                           G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                        MONITORING WELLS - AREA 1
                                              NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION -  WATER INGESTION  AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)                      18000
Percent submerged                          75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                                   Table 0-33
                                                                               G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                            MONITORING WELLS - AREA 1
                                                       EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - UATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
      U.S. EPA
    Carcinogen
Classification
Slope Factor
 (kg-day/mg)
                                                                    Source
  Permeability
a     Constant
         cm/hr
Concentration c
         ug/l
             Ingestion
Lifetime Average       Excess
 Chemical Intake     Lifetime
       mg/kg-day  Cancer Risk
       Dermal Absorption
Lifetime Average        Excess
 Chemical Intake      Lifetime
       mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk
Arsenic                                      A                2          b      8.000E-04            57.9             1.654E-03        3E-03             2.233E-06         4E-06
Benzene                                      A            0.029       IRIS      8.000E-04           218.6             6.246E-03        2E-04             8.432E-06         2E-07
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether                     B2              1.1       IRIS      8.000E-04            16.6             4.743E-04        5E-04             6.403E-07         7E-07
1,1-Dichloroethane                          B2            0.091      HEAST      8.000E-04            98.6             2.817E-03        3E-04             3.803E-06         3E-07
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine                      B2           0.0049       IRIS      8.000E-04            14.8             4.229E-04        2E-06             S.709E-07         3E-09
Vinyl chloride                               A              2.3      HEAST      8.000E-04           220.3             6.294E-03        1E-02             8.497E-06         2E-05

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                           2E-02                               3E-05
SUM OF RISKS U/0 ARSENIC                                                                                                               2E-02                               3E-05

EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                   Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                            70
Number of days/year exposed                365
Number of years exposed                     70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)              70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                   2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                       18000
Percent submerged (interger)                75
Time in water (hrs/day)                   0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingest ion                                0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                                  Table D-34
                                                                             G & H LANDFILL  SITE
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS -  AREA  2
                                              NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION -  WATER INGESTION  AND DERMAL  ABSORPTION



Chemical
Barium
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Manganese
Naphthalene
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I /day)
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)

Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.05
0.02
0.1
0.03
0.2
0.4
0.02
0.6
0.2


Residential

Adult
70

2

18000
75
0.25

Permeability
Constant Concentration c
Source a cm/hr ug/l
IRIS 0.0008 528.3
IRIS 0.0008 166.1
IRIS 0.0008 21.4
HEAST 0.0008 7.0
HEAST 0.0008 516.7
HEAST 0.0008 6.4
b 0.0008 23.9
HEAST(v) 0.0008 4.9
HEAST 0.0008 197.3












Ingest ion
Daily Intake Hazard
(DI) Quotient Does Intake
mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.0151 0.302 NO
0.0047 0.237 NO
0.0006 0.006 NO
0.0002 0.007 NO
0.0148 0.074 NO
0.0002 0.000 NO
0.0007 0.034 NO
0.0001 0.000 NO
0.0056 0.028 NO
0.689












Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
2.04E-05
6.41E-06
8.25E-07
2.70E-07
1.99E-05
2.47E-07
9.22E-07
1.89E-07
7.61E-06












Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does


Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
4.08E-04
3.20E-04
8.25E-06
9.00E-06
9.96E-05
6.17E-07
4.61E-05
3.15E-07
3.81E-05
0.001











NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO












a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on
   the arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                                  Table D-35
                                                                              G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                           MONITORING WELLS - AREA 2
                                                      EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                            Ingest ion                    Dermal Absorption

                                      U.S. EPA                               Permeability                      Lifetime Average       Excess      Lifetime Average        Excess
                                    Carcinogen     Slope Factor            a     Constant   Concentration c     Chemical Intake     Lifetime       Chemical Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                        Classification      (kg-day/mg)     Source          cm/hr            ug/l             mg/kg-day  Cancer Risk             mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

Arsenic                                      A                2          b      8.000E-04           104.9             2.997E-03        6E-03             4.046E-06         8E-06
Benzene                                      A            0.029       IRIS      8.000E-04            12.5             3.571E-04        1E-05             4.821E-07         1E-08
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate                  B2            0.014       IRIS      8.000E-04           166.1             4.746E-03        7E-05             6.407E-06         9E-08

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                           6E-03                               8E-06
SUM OF RISKS W/0 ARSENIC                                                                                                               8E-05                               1E-07


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                   Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                            70
Number of days/year exposed                365
Number of years exposed                     70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)              70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                   2

Dermal abs. assumptions:                                                           '

Surface area (cm2)                       18000
Percent submerged (interger)                75
Time in water (hrs/day)                   0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingestion                                0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
Page 1 of 2
                                                                           Table D-36
                                                                       G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                    MONITORING WELLS - AREA 3
                                          NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION



Chemical
Acetone
Barium
2-Butanone
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Di butyl phthalate
Ethyl benzene
Manganese
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:

Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.2
0.03
0.01
1
0.005
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.02
0.6
0.2


Residential

Adult
70




Source
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS
b
HEAST(v)
HEAST








Permeabi I i ty
Constant
a cm/hr
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008









Concentration c
ug/l
7.2
1214.3
95.6
43.2
2.7
2.6
5.4
5.4
24.7
6.3
428.7
23.9
147.7
86.1
12.6
95








Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0002
0.0347
0.0027
0.0012
0.0001
0.0001
0.0002
0.0002
0.0007
0.0002
0.0122
0.0007
0.0042
0.0025
0.0004
0.0027







Ingest ion
Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.002
0.694
0.055
0.006
0.003
0.007
0.000
0.031
0.007
0.002
0.061
0.001
0.008
0.123
0.001
0.014
1.015








Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO








Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000







Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does


Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001






NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO







Water Intake (I/day)

-------
Page 2 of 2
                                                                           Table D-36
                                                                       G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                    MONITORING WELLS - AREA 3
                                          NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)                      18000
Percent submerged                          75
Time in water (hrs/day)                  0.25
a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                                  Table D-37
                                                                              G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                           MONITORING WELLS - AREA 3
                                                     EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                            Ingest ion                   Dermal Absorption

                                      U.S. EPA                               Permeability                      Lifetime Average       Excess       Lifetime Average        Excess
                                    Carcinogen     Slope Factor            a     Constant   Concentration c     Chemical Intake     Lifetime        Chemical  Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                        Classification      (kg-day/mg)     Source          cm/hr            ug/l             mg/kg-day  Cancer  Risk             mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

Arsenic                                      A                2          b      8.000E-04            33.7             9.629E-04       2E-03             1.300E-06         3E-06
Benzene                                      A            0.029       IRIS      8.000E-04            14.9             4.257E-04       1E-05             5.747E-07         2E-08
Chloroform                                  B2           0.0061       IRIS      8.000E-04             2.6             7.429E-05       5E-07             1.003E-07         6E-10

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                          2E-03                               3E-06
SUM OF RISKS U/0 ARSENIC                                                                                                              IE-OS                               2E-08


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                   Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                            70
Number of days/year exposed                365
Number of years exposed                     70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)              70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                   2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                       18000
Percent submerged (interger)                75
Time in water (hrs/day)                   0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingest ion                                0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                                 Table D-38
                                                                             G & H  LANDFILL SITE
                                                                         MONITORING WELLS  - AREA  4
                                              NONCARCIMOGEN1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION AND  DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
Barium
Manganese
Nickel
Phenol
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of Dl/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day)
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)
Inges
Reference Permeability Daily Intake Ha
Dose (RfD) Constant Concentration c (DI) Quot
mg/kg-day Source a cm/hr ug/l mg/kg-day DI
0.05 IRIS 0.0008 472.0 0.0135 0
0.2 HEAST 0.0008 314.0 0.0090 0
0.02 b 0.0008 21.6 0.0006 0
0.6 HEAST(v) 0.0008 4.9 0.0001 0
0.2 HEAST 0.0008 984.6 0.0281 0
0

Residential
Adult
70

2
18000
75
0.25
tion Dermal absorption
zard Daily Intake Hazard
ient Does Intake (DI) Quotient Does Intake
/RfD Exceed RfD? mg/kg-day DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
.270 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.045 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.031 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.000 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.141 NO 0.0000 0.000 NO
.486 0.001

b.
Sources of RfDs:
IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989.
Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                                  Table D-39
                                                                              G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                          MONITORING WELLS - AREA 4
                                                    EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGEST ION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                            Ingest ion                    Dermal  Absorption

                                      U.S. EPA                               Permeability                      Lifetime Average       Excess      Lifetime Average       Excess
                                    Carcinogen     Slope Factor            a     Constant   Concentration c     Chemical Intake     Lifetime       Chemical Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                        Classification      (kg-day/mg)     Source          cm/hr            ug/l             mg/kg-day  Cancer Risk             mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

Arsenic                                      A                2          b      8.000E-04            23.8             6.800E-04        1E-03             9.180E-07        2E-06
Benzene                                      A            0.029       IRIS      8.000E-04            14.7             4.200E-04        1E-OS             5.670E-07        2E-08
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether                     B2              1.1       IRIS      8.000E-04             5.9             1.686E-04        2E-04             2.276E-07        3E-07

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                           2E-03                              2E-06
SUM OF RISKS W/0 ARSENIC                                                                                                               2E-04                              3E-07


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                   Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                            70
Number of days/year exposed                365
Number of years exposed                     70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)              70

Ingestion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                   2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                       18000
Percent submerged (interger)                75
Time in water (hrs/day)                   0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingest ion                                0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Surmary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1.  U.S. EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                             Table 0-40
                                                                         G & H LANDFILL  SITE
                                                                      MONITORING UELLS -  AREA 5
                                           NONCARCIMOGEN 1C HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - WATER INGESTION  AND  DERMAL ABSORPTION
Chemical
Acetone
Bar inn
Carbon disulfide
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Manganese
Mercury (alkyl and inorganic)
Nickel
Vanadium
Zinc
Hazard Index (Sum of Dl/RfD)
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
General assumptions:
Receptor
Body Weight (kg)
Ingest ion assumptions:
Water Intake (I/day)
Dermal abs. assumptions:
Surface area (cm2)
Percent submerged
Time in water (hrs/day)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.1
0.05
0.1
1
0.005
0.2
0.0003
0.02
0.007
0.2


Residential
Adult
70

2
18000
75
0.25
Permeabi I i ty
Constant Concentration c
Source a cm/hr ug/l
IRIS 0.0008 5.2
IRIS 0.0008 296.9
IRIS 0.0008 2.8
IRIS 0.0008 41.1
IRIS 0.0008 41.1
HE AST 0.0008 509.6
IRIS 0.0008 0.3
b 0.0008 30.6
HEAST 0.0008 26.1
HE AST 0.0008 566.1


Ingest ion
Daily Intake Hazard
(DI) Quotient
mg/kg-day DI/RfD
0.0001 0.001
0.0085 0.170
0.0001 0.001
0.0012 0.001
0.0012 0.235
0.0146 0.073
0.0000 0.029
0.0009 0.044
0.0007 0.107
0.0162 0.081
0.740

Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO


Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000


Dermal absorption
Hazard
Quotient Does Intake
DI/RfD Exceed RfD?
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001

NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO


a. Sources of RfDs:
   IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System.  U.S.  EPA 1988.
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989
   HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  U.S.  EPA 1989.
   Verified value awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Nickel value base on nickel-soluble salts.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                                                                           Table D-41
                                                                       G & H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                    MONITORING WELLS - AREA 5
                                               EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - WATER INGESTION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION
                                                                                                                            Ingestion                    Dermal  Absorption

                                      U.S. EPA                               Permeability                      Lifetime Average       Excess      Lifetime Average       Excess
                                    Carcinogen     Slope Factor            a     Constant   Concentration c     Chemical Intake     Lifetime       Chemical Intake      Lifetime
Chemical                        Classification      (kg-day/mg)     Source          cm/hr            ug/l             ing/kg-day  Cancer Risk             mg/kg-day   Cancer Risk

Arsenic                                      A                2          b      8.000E-04             8.8             2.514E-04        5E-04             3.394E-07        7E-07
Trichloroethene                             B2            0.011       IRIS      8.000E-04             8.2             2.343E-04        3E-06             3.163E-07        3E-09

SUM OF RISKS                                                                                                                           5E-04                              7E-07
SUM OF RISKS W/0 ARSENIC                                                                                                               3E-06                              3E-09


EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS

Exposure setting                   Residential

General assumptions:

Body weight (kg)                            70
Number of days/year exposed                365
Number of years exposed                     70
Averaging time: lifetime (yrs)              70

Ingest ion assumptions:

Daily water intake (I/day)                   2

Dermal abs. assumptions:

Surface area (cm2)                       18000
Percent submerged (interger)                75
Time in water (hrs/day)                   0.25

Lifetime average media intake
(I/kg body weight per day):

Ingest ion                                0.029

a. Sources of Cancer Potency Factors:
     IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
     HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
     HEAST(v) - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Verified values awaiting entry into IRIS.
b. Based on Risk Assessment Council unit risk of 5x10-5(ug/l)-1. U.S.EPA 1988.
c. Concentration shown is the 95th percent upper confidence limit on the
   arithmetic average chemical concentration.

-------
                Appendix Table D-42
LISTING OF MONITORING WELLS AND SAMPLES BY AREAS
                G&H LANDFILL SITE

AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3
PHASE I LANDFILL PHASE O LANDFILL PHASE ffl LANDFILL
SAMPLE NOS. SAMPLE NOS. SAMPLE NOS.
GH-FROWOH33A-02 OH-OWOH32A-02 OH-OWOH30A-02
OH-FRGWOH42B-02 OH-OWOH45A-02 OH-OWGH30B-02
GH-FRGWRD24-02 GH-GWI05-02 GH-GWGH31A-02
GH-FRGWRW30-02 GH-GWRL17-02 GH-GWGH31B-02
GH-GWGH11B-02 GH04B-01 GH-GWGH31C-02
GH-GWGH12A-02 GH04C-01 OH-GWRL29-02
GH-GWGH12B-O2 GH05A-01 GH23A-01
GH-GWGH24A-02 GH06A-01
GH-GWGH26A-02 GH06B-01
GH-GWGH33B-02 GH07A-01
GH-GWGH35A-02 105-01
GH-GWGH35B-02 RL17-01
GH-GWGH37A-02
GH-GWGH38A-02
GH-GWGH39A-02
GH-GWGH40A-02
GH-GWGH40B-O2
GH-GWGH41B-02
GH-GWGH03B-02
GH-GWRD08XX-02
GH-GWRD18-02
GH-GWRL04-02
GH-GWRL06-02
GH-GWRW10-02
GH-GWRW14-02
GH-GWRW21-02
GH-GWRW22-02
GH-GWRW23-02
GH-GWRW24-02
GH11B-01
GH12A-01
GH12B-01
GH20A-01
GH20B-01
GH21A-01
GH22A-01
GH22B-01
GH26A-01
GH33A-02
103-01
RD02X-01
RD08XX-01
RD 18-01
RL04-01
RL06-01
RW07-01
RW12X-01
RW14-01
RW19-01

AREA4
CANAL A WETLAND AREA
SAMPLE NOS.
GH-GWOH01A-02
GH-GWGH01B-02
OH-GWGH02A-02
OH-OWGH02B-02
OH-OWOH03C-02
OH-OWGH08B-O2
GH-OWGH09A-02
GH-OWGH09B-02
GH-GWGH34A-02
OH-GWOH34B-02
OH-GWOH43A-02
GH-GWGH43B-02
GH-GWGH44A-02
GH01A-01
GH01B-01
GH01C-01
GH02A-01
GH02B-01
GH02C-01
GH03A-01
GH10A-01
GH10B-01
GH10C-01
GH25A-01

























AREAS
AUTOMOBILE DISPOSAL YARD
AND COMMERCIAL AREA
SAMPLE NOS.
GH-FRGWGH17B-02
GH-GWGH17A-02
GH-GWGH19A-02
GH-GWGH19B-02
GH-GWGH27A-02
GH-GWGH28A-02
GH-GWGH28B-02
GH-GWGH29A-02
GH-GWGH29B-O2
GH-GWGH29C-02
GH-GWGH36A-02
GH-GWGH36B-02
GH17A-01
GH17B-01
GH17C-01
GH19A-01


































-------
                                                                         Page 1 of 13
 Sample Number
FRRW07-99
GH11B-01
GH12A-01
GH12B-01
GH13B-01
                                 Table D-43
               SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
               THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                          CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                             G&H LANDFILL SITE

                    AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Chemical
ARSENIC


BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


ARSENIC
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


Detected
Concentration
("9/1)
50.7 J


4J

13400
166
3.7 J
1640
53.2
6 J


43
10


14400
237
64


5.4 J
2J

1390
113
14


24.7
6010
169
2J



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Flnal
SMCL-Final
1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
1 x 10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1x10-6
1 X10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 X10-6
1x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1x10-6

Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2

-------
                                                       Page 2 of 13
                  Table D-43
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

     AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Sample Number
FRGH13B-99





GH20A-01
QH20B-01
GH21A-01










GH21A-01DL




GH22A-01



GH26A-01







Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


MANGANESE
ARSENIC
ARSENIC


BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
XYLENE (TOTAL)

BENZENE


XYLENE (TOTAL)

ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC


BENZENE


Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
25.1
6630
170
7J


197
22.4
118


110


13800
51.9
26.1 J
800 E

140 D


940 D

8.1 J
357
108
1 J
93.6


56



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1 x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10«
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal

Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2
50
0.0025
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
15.4
20
400
0
0.67
5
20
400
0.0025
300
50
0
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5

-------
                                                       Page 3 of 13
                 Table D-43
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

     AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Sample Number
GH26A-01
(continued)

GH-FRGWGH33A-02






GH-FRGWGH40A-02






GH-FRGWGH42B-02


GH-FRGWRD24-02




GH-FRGWRW05-02A*



GH-GWGH11B-02



Chemical
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE

ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
AROCLOR-1254


XYLENE (TOTAL)
ARSENIC
IRON
Detected
Concentration
("9/1)
3J
11000
198
39.6
17 J


2 J
10000 J
63.7 J
31.9
15


13
1470
132
25.5
2090
51.4
12
1 J

34
130
43 J


53
2.4 J
2830 J

Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Flnal
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1 x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1 x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x10-6
MCL-Final
1x1f>6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1 x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1 x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal

Criteria Level
("9/1)
0.03
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
30
20
0
0.5
0.013
20
0.0025
300

-------
                                                                          Page 4 of 13
 Sample Number
GH-GWGH12A-02
GH-GWGH12A-02
GH-GWGH12B-02
GH-GWGH24A-02
GH-GWGH26A-02
                                  Table D-43
                SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
               THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                              G&H LANDFILL SITE

                     AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Chemical
AROCLOR-1254


ARSENIC
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


ARSENIC
MANGANESE
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC
BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

ARSENIC


BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
1.8


28.8
15 J


10700
218
55


3 J
116
42
46.5
560


69
530
17600
102
9J
3500

170


210 J


11
13900
340

Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1 X10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
MCLS-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
OC
1x1(^6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal

Criteria Level
("9/1)
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
0
2
2
0.0025
50
0.1
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
300
50
4.9
20
400
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50

-------
                                                                                  Page 5 of 13
                                     Table D-43
                 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                             CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                 G&H LANDFILL SITE

                       AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
 Sample Number
GH-GWGH33A-02
       Chemical
ARSENIC
BENZENE
                  IRON
                  MANGANESE
 Detected
Concentration
   (ug/l)

      38
      17 J
                             11300J
                              64.3 J
 Criteria (a)
 Exceeded

1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x1f>6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
                                                                         Criteria Level
0.0025
    0
  0.67
    5
  300
   50
GH-GWGH33B-02
GH-GWGH33B-02
GH-GWGH35A-02
GH-GWGH35B-02
GH-GWGH37A-02
GH-GWGH38A-02
ARSENIC


BENZENE


IRON

ARSENIC


BENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE

ARSENIC
IRON

ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE

4-METHYLPHENOL
AROCLOR-1254
                  ARSENIC
                  BARIUM
307


11


12800 J
71.7


26


14000
123
5J
6240
24.4
1040
4 J

1050
467
330 J
9.5 D


35.7
1070
1 X10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
OC
MCLG- Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
300
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
300
50
0.1
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
1000

-------
                  Table D-43
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                                        Page 6 of 13


Sample Number
GH-GWGH38A-02
(continued)







GH-GWGH38A-02 DL



GH-GWGH39A-02




GH-GWGH40A-02






GH-GWGH40B-02


GH-GWGH41B-02








Chemical
BENZENE


ETHYLBENZENE



IRON
MANGANESE
4-METHYLPHENOL
AROCLOR-1254


ARSENIC


IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BARIUM
IRON
ARSENIC


BENZENE


IRON
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
1300


2900



8800
198
260 D
12 DJ


61


4800 J
332J
29.4
23


9J
1790
157
24.7
1400
2650
110


42 J


10200 J


Criteria (a) Criteria Level
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
TP
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-RnaJ
OC
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
(ug/i)
0
0.67
5
30
700
700
2400
300
50
0.1
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
- 50
50
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
1000
300
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300

-------
                                                                              Page 7 of 13
                                    Table D-43
                SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                            CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                               G&H LANDFILL SITE

                      AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP
Sample Number
GH-GWGH42B-02
Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
24.8
2070
51.7
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0.0025
300
50
GH-GWRD08XX-02
GH-GWRD18-02
GH-GWRD24-02
GH-GWRL04-02
GH-GWRL06-02
ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE

ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE

ARSENIC
ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

ALUMINUM
BARIUM
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE

4-METHYLPHENOL
ALUMINUM
AROCLOR-1254
                 ARSENIC
                 BARIUM
71.4


2J

5670
91.7
111


6530
54.2
11.5
33
110
66J
1330 J
150


2J
39400 J
604 J
180 J
169 J
0.93 J


32.7
2240 J



1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG- Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Final
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
OC
SMCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
0.0025
50
50
300
50
0.0025
30
20
50
1000
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.1
50
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
1000
1500
5000
5000

-------
                                                       Page 8 of 13
                  Table D-43
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

     AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Sample Number
GH-GWRL06-02
(continued)







GH-GWRW05-02*



GH-GWRW10-02
















GH-GWRW11-02A*








Chemical
BENZENE


ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
XYLENE (TOTAL)

AROCLOR-1254


XYLENE (TOTAL)
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC
BARIUM



BENZENE


ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
VINYL CHLORIDE


AROCLOR-1254


TOLUENE



Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
130


170
53300 J
797 J
109
1300

43 J


70
800
3J
5990



230 J


590
131000
1710
56.9
20 J
1200


189 J


4980 J




Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Pro posed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
OC
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG- Proposed
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1 x 10-6
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
MCLG- Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x1CW
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
DW

Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0
0.67
5
30
300
50
15.4
20
400
0
0.5
0.013
20
0.1
0.0025
1000
1500
5000
5000
0
0.67
5
30
300
50
15.4
4.9
0
2
2
0
0.5
0.013
40
2000
2000
2420

-------
                                                       Page 9 of 13
                 Table D-43
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

     AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Sample Number
GH-GWRW11-02A*
(continued)


GH-GWRW11-02A«





GH-GWRW14-02











GH-GWRW14-02



GH-GWRW14-02DL







GH-GWRW21-02




Chemical
XYLENE (TOTAL)

*

AROCLOR-1254


ETHYLBENZENE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

ALUMINUM
ARSENIC


BENZENE




BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

BENZENE


ETHYLBENZENE


XYLENE (TOTAL)

ARSENIC


Detected
Concentration
(ug/1)
92340 J



21 J


406
1190

115J
51.8


520 J




12 J
680 J
25200
110
8J
890 J

1500 D


2100 D


5000 D

51.7



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
DW
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
DW

Criteria Level
("9/1)
20
400
10000
10000
0
0.5
0.013
30
20
400
50
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
300
50
4.9
20
400
0
0.67
5
30
700
700
20
400
0.0025
50
50

-------
                                                       Page 10 of 13
                  Table D-43
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

     AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Sample Number
GH-GWRW21-02
(continued)



GH-GWRW22-02










GH-GWRW23-02


GH-GWRW24-02



GH-GWRW24-02














Chemical
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC


BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
AROCLOR-1254


ARSENIC
BARIUM



BENZENE


ETHYLBENZENE
IRON
MANGANESE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
2J

7300
119
34.5 J
14
76


83


7J
74
11800
169
23.3
7600
318
68.5 J
1.5


9.3 J
2290 J



160


230
45800 J
477 J
1400


Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Flnal
SMCL-Final
TP
OC
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
MCLG-Finai
1 X10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
DW

Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0
0.67
300
50
15.4
0.1
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
300
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0
0.5
0.013
0.0025
1000
1500
5000
5000
0
0.67
5
30
300
50
20
400

-------
                                                       Page 11 of 13
                 Table D-43
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

     AREA 1 - PHASE I LANDFILL AND OIL SEEP


Sample Number
103-01




RD02X-01




RD08XX-01







RD18-01






RL04-01





RL06-01







Chemical
ARSENIC
BENZENE


LEAD
ARSENIC
IRON
LEAD


ARSENIC


BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC


BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
BARIUM
BENZENE


IRON
XYLENE (TOTAL)
4-METHYLPHENOL
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE


Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
12.9
10


6
10
569
29.9


74.6


5


7350
117
130


2J

6310
54.2
1370
180


46200
36
140
27
1360
120



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
MCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
OC
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal

Criteria Level
("9/0
0.0025
0
0.67
5
5
0.0025
300
5
20
20
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
1000
0
0.67
5
300
20
0.1
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
5

-------
                                  Table D-43
                SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
               THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                              G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                                                         Page 12 of 13
 Sample Number
RL06-01
RL06-01DL
RW07-01
RW12X-01
RW14-01


Chemical
ETHYLBENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
TOLUENE
VINYL CHLORIDE


XYLENE (TOTAL)

BENZENE


ETHYLBENZENE


XYLENE (TOTAL)

ARSENIC


BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ARSENIC


Detected
Concentration
(ug/0
920 J


47600
509
48.2
370 J
18


4700 J

140 DJ


10000


6800 D

65.4


4 J

13600
162
49.6
4 J

22000
276
1 J
52



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
SMCL-Proposed
MCLS- Final
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Rnal
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
MCLS-Rnal
1 x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW

Criteria Level
("9/1)
30
700
700
300
50
15.4
40
0
2
2
20
400
0
0.67
5
30
700
700
20
400
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
0
0.0025
50
50

-------
                                                                                        Page 13 of 13
                                        Table D-43
                   SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                  THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                                CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                   G&H LANDFILL SITE

                        AREA 1 - PHAS


Sample Number
RW14-01
(continued)











RW19-01











Chemical
BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ETHYLBENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
XYLENE (TOTAL)

ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
TRICHLOROETHENE
VINYL CHLORIDE


Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
1500


8J
2000


25200
101
16.6 J
14
8700

8.5 J
3J

68300
2060
18.8 J
1 J
3J



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
SMCL-Proposed
DW
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
TP
MCLG-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1x10-6

Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0
0.67
5
0.03
30
700
700
300
50
15.4
4.9
20
400
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
15.4
0
0
2
2
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
         MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
        MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
        SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
       1X10-6- Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1x10-6
           TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
          DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)

-------
                  Table D-44
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE
                                                        Page 1 of 2
           AREA 2 - PHASE II LANDFILL


Sample Number
GH04B-01

GH05A-01


GH06A-01
'•• .




GH06B-01







GHQ7A-01
i ;•;-.* S



GH-GWGH32A-02







GB-GWGH45A-O2



GH-GWI05-02



Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
ARSENIC


BENZENE


IRON
NICKEL
ARSENIC
IRON
VINYL CHLORIDE


ARSENIC


BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC

Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
38.4
1030
9650
884
21.3 J
45.4
1 J

12200
636
21 .6 J
316


6


13500
35.8 J
20.1
4640
6 J


52.5


11


18400
298
693
8.2 J
7590
486
69.7


Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x106
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x 10-6
MCL-Final

Criteria Level
("9/1)
0.0025
300
300
50
15.4
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
15.4
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
15.4
0.0025
300
0
2
2
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
50

-------
                                                                                         Page 2 of 2
                                        Table D-44
                   SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                  THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                                CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                   G&H LANDFILL SITE

                                AREA 2 - PHASE II LANDFILL


Sample Number Chemical

BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
GH-GWRL17-02 ARSENIC
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
105-01 ARSENIC


BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
XYLENE (TOTAL)
RL17-01 ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)

21


18300
438
41.1
24 J


13700
376
78.8


18


28500
458
30
30
2J

16200
358

Criteria (a)
Exceeded
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1 x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal

Criteria Level
("9/0
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
0.0025
50
50
0
0.67
5
300
50
20
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
          MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
         MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
         SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
        1 X 10-6 - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1x10-6
           TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
           DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)

-------
                                                       Page 1 of 2
                  Table D-45
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

           AREA 3 - PHASE III LANDFILL


Sample Number
GH23A-01

GH-FRGWGH30A-02






GH-FRGWGH31A-02






GH-GWGH30A-O2




GH-GWGH30B-02






GH-GWGH31A-02








Chemical
ARSENIC
LEAD
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC


BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
10.4
5.8
269 J
54.8


1030
7160
292 J
55.2 J
27.1
5


15800
232
654J
44.5
9320
12.8 J
723 J
39.6
1470
16


10200
102
69.3 J
28.6
6 J


15900
209

Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x1(W
MCL-Proposed
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
DW
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
MCL-Proposed
SMCL-Final
1 xlO-6
MCL-Final
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal

Criteria Level
("9/1)
0.0025
5
50
0.0025
50
50
1000
300
50
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
300
5
50
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50

-------
                                                                                         Page 2 of 2
                                         Table D-45
                    SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                   THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                                CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                    G&H LANDFILL SITE

                                AREA 3 - PHASE III LANDFILL


Sample Number
GH-GWGH31B-02






GH-GWGH31C-02




GH-GWRL29-02











Chemical
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
CHLOROFORM

IRON
2-BUTANONE
4-METHYLPHENOL
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE


IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
24.2
1360
26


9750
160
544
5.6 J
2J

663
200 J
360 J
65.4 J
9.8 J
6


62500
268
96.3

Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCL-Final
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1 X10-6
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
DW
OC
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
TP

Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0.0025
1000
0
0.67
5
300
50
50
0.0025
0.19
100 g
300
170
0.1
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
50
15.4
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
         MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
        MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
        SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
       1 X 10-6 - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1x10-6
           TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
          DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)

-------
                                                                               Page 1 of 4
                                     Table D-46
                  SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                 THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                             CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                G&H LANDFILL SITE

                        AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMAZOO CANAL


Sample Number
GH01A-01


GH01B-01



GH01C-01


GH02A-01







GH02B-01







Chemical
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
. BARIUM
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
ARSENIC
BENZENE


IRON
NICKEL
Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
46.6
10300
118
14.8
4J

993
1440
368
56
45.4
60


9J
12500
112
5J
19.5
5


4580
15.8 J

Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1 x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
1x10-6
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
TP

Criteria Level
(ug/l)
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
300
1000
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
4.9
0.0025
0
0.67
5
300
15.4
GH02C-01

GH03A-01
ARSENIC

ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
NICKEL
 6.1 J

 1.8 J
570
649
18.8 J
1 x 10-6

1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
TP
0.0025

0.0025
  300
   50
  15.4
GH08C-01
ARSENIC
IRON
 8.7 J
597
                                                         SMCL-Rnal
                0.0025
                  300

-------
                                                                                Page 2 of 4
GH10B-01

GH25A-01



GH-GWGH01A-02
GH-GWGH01&O2
GH-GWGH02A-02
GH-GWGH02B-02
                                     Table D-46
                  SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                 THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                             CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                 G&H LANDFILL SITE

                        AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMAZOO CANAL
Sample Number
GH10A-01
Chemical
ARSENIC
BARIUM
IRON
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
2.7 J
1140
1730
Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Final
Criteria Level
(MO/I)
0.0025
1000
300
MANGANESE

ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE

ARSENIC
BENZENE

BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE

ARSENIC
LEAD

4-METHYLPHENOL
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON

ARSENIC
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
GH-GWGH03B-02RE   VINYL CHLORIDE
82.5
          SMCL-Final
                              50
39.4
4730
110
33.2
2J

3J
7730
166
15.9
15 J
3J
52.6 J
14
28


11
3470
22.9
3 J
1590
88.7
250


1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1 x 10-6
1x1^6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1 x10-6
MCL-Proposed
OC
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCLG-Rnal
1x10-6
MCL-Rnal
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1 x 10-6
1 X10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Rnal
1 X10-6
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
0
0.67
0.03
300
50
0.0025
5
0.1
50
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
0.0025
0.03
300
50
0
2
2

-------
                                                       Page 3 of 4
                  Table D-46
 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
           CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
              G&H LANDFILL SITE

      AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMA2OO CANAL


Sample Number
GH-GWGH03C-02


GH-GWGH08B-02

GH-GWGH09A-02




GH-GWGH09B-02


GH-GWGH34A-O2


GH-GWGH34B-02


GH-GWGH43A-02


GH-GWGH43B-Q2









Chemical
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
BENZENE

BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
MANGANESE
NICKEL
ARSENIC
BENZENE

IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
953
12.9
904
2.9 J
188
32.4
2J

4J
546
25
629
426
20.3
1480
1150
12.5
1050
79.4
3J
473
32.3 J
16.8
3J

2900
102
26



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
TP
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
MCLS-Final
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6

Criteria Level
(ug/i)
50
0.0025
300
0.0025
50
0.0025
0
0.67
0.03
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0.03
50
15.4
0.0025
0
0.67
300
50
0
2
2

-------
                                                                                        Page 4 of 4
                                         Table D-46
                   SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                  THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                                CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                    G&H LANDFILL SITE

                          AREA 4 - CLINTON-KALAMAZOO CANAL


Sample Number
GH-GWGH44A-02






GH-GWGHO3B-02







Chemical
ARSENIC
BENZENE


BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
IRON
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
VINYL CHLORIDE


Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
35.6
56


7J
7140
135
14.6
3930
72.8
330 J



Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
1 x 10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
MCLS-Hnal
MCL-Final
1 X10-6

Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
0
0.67
5
0.03
300
50
0.0025
300
50
0
2
2
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
         MCL  - Maximum Contaminant Limit
        MCLG  - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
        SMCL  - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
       1 X 10-6  - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1 x 10-6
           TP  - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
          DW  - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)

-------
                                                                               Page 1 of 2
 Sample Number
GH17A-01
GH17&O1
GH17C-01
GH19A-01

GH-FRGWGH17B-02


GH-GWGH17A-02



GH-GWGH17B-02


GH-GWGH19A-02
GH-GWGH19B-02
GH-GWGH27A-02
                                     Table D-47
                  SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                 THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                             CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                 G&H LANDFILL SITE

                        AREA 5 - AUTOMOBILE DISPOSAL YARD


Chemical
IRON
MANGANESE
TRICHLOROETHENE


ARSENIC
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
LEAD




Detected
Concentration
(ug/l)
345
60.8
14


8.4 J
178
623
4.2 J
185





Criteria (a)
Exceeded
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1xir>6
MCL-Final
1x10-6
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
MCL-Pro posed
MCLG- Proposed
DW
MCL-Final
TP

Criteria Level
(ug/l)
300
50
0
2.8
5
0.0025
50
50
0.0025
5
20
20
50
50
MANGANESE

ARSENIC
MANGANESE

TRICHLOROETHENE
ARSENIC
MANGANESE

CHROMIUM
MANGANESE

ALUMINUM
IRON
MANGANESE

ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
TRICHLOROETHENE
157
SMCL-Rnal
                             50
11.1
176
14 J


11.7
169
170



172 J
341
1020
185
73.2 J
444
7 J


1 X10-6
SMCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Final
1 xlO-6
SMCL-Rnal
MCL-Rnal
MCL-Proposed
MCLG-Proposed
DW
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Rnal
SMCL-Proposed
SMCL-Rnal
MCLG-Rnal
1 X10-6
MCL-Rnal
0.0025
50
0
2.8
5
0.0025
50
50
100
100
120
50
50
300
50
50
50
0
2.8
5

-------
                                                                                         Page 2 of 2
                                         Table D-47
                    SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONCENTRATIONS
                   THAT EXCEED U.S. EPA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS,
                                CRITERIA, AND GUIDELINES
                                    G&H LANDFILL SITE

                           AREA 5 - AUTOMOBILE DISPOSAL YARD


Sample Number
GH-GWGH28B-02

GH-GWGH29A-02


GH-GWGH29B-02



GH-GWGH29C-02



GH-GWGH36A-02










GH-GWGH36B-02





Chemical
ARSENIC
MANGANESE
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
LEAD


MANGANESE
NICKEL
TRICHLOROETHENE


ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
IRON
MANGANESE
Detected
Concentration
(ug/i)
2.3 J
100
9.6 J
540
675
159 J
2.7 J
1310
358
2930
15.2
6930
1250
6010
15.7
23800
34


1200
50.1
22


308
6.7 J
2840
143

Criteria (a)
Exceeded
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
1x106
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1xir>6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x106
SMCL-Final
MCL-Proposed
MCLG- Pro posed
DW
SMCL-Final
TP
MCLG-Final
1x10-6
MCL-Final
SMCL-Proposed
1x10-6
SMCL-Final
SMCL-Final

Criteria Level
(ug/i)
0.0025
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0.0025
300
50
50
0.0025
300
5
20
20
50
15.4
0
2.8
5
50
0.0025
300
50
(a) Abbreviations for Criteria Exceeded:
         MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit
        MCLG - Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal
        SMCL - Secondary Maximum Contaminant Limit
       1 X 10-6 - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Level at which cancer risk equals 1 x 10-6
           TP - Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Human Health -
               Ingestion of Water - Toxicity Protection for Noncarcinogenic Health Effects
          DW - Drinking Water Health Advisories - Lifetime (Noncarcinogenic Effects)

-------
                                                     Table D-48
                                               G & H LANDFILL SITE
                               SITE VISITOR - EXPOSURE TO VOLATILES - PHASE I LANDFILL
                               NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - INHALATION


Chemical
1 ,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
Reference
Dose(RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.0007
0.01
O.I
0.01
0.09
0.02
1
0.4



Source a
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST

Onsite(*)
Concentration
mg/m3
4.76E-02
1.31E-04
2.08E-04
8.43E-04
2.24E-04
3.08E-04
1.50E-04
8.99E-03
4.70E-03

Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001

Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.380800
0.029943
0.003328
0.001349
0.003584
0.000548
0.001200
0.001438
0.001880
0.424

Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO

EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Receptor
Body weight (kg)
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Volume of air inhaled/day (m3/day)
Volume of air inhaled per day per
kilogram of body weight (m3/kg-day)
Site Visitor
Adult
70
1.4
8
11
0.16









































a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989
b. No inhalation RfD available, based on ingestion RfD
(*) Concentrations are modeled. See Appendix E.

-------
                                                          Table D-49
                                                       G & H LANDFILL
                                   SITE VISITOR - EXPOSURE TO VOLATILES - PHASE I LANDFILL
                                        EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - INHALATION


Chemical
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
SUM OF RISKS
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
A
B2
B2
B2
B2

Onsite (*) Lifetime Average
Slope Factor a Concentration Chemical Intake
(kg-day/mg) Source mg/m3 mg/kg-day
0.029 IRIS 2.30E-04 0.00
0.13 IRIS 1.31E-04 0.00
0.081 IRIS 2.08E-04 0.00
0.0033 HEAST 2.24E-04 0.00
0.013 IRIS 3.34E-03 0.00

Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
5E-09
IE-OS
IE-OS
6E-10
3E-08
7E-08
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Body weight (kilograms)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Number of days per week
Number of weeks per year
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average air intake
(m3/kg body wt.- day)
Site Visitor
1.4
70
8
1
25
5
70
0.0008





















a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
  IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
  HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
(*) Concentrations are modeled. See Appendix E.

-------
                                                       Table D-50
                                                   G & H LANDFILL SITE
                             OFFSITE EXPOSURE TO VOLATILES RELEASED FROM LANDFILL
                                NONCARCINOGENIC HEALTH RISK EVALUATION - INHALATION


Chemical
1 ,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
Xylenes
Hazard Index (Sum of DI/RfD)
Reference
Dose (RfD)
mg/kg-day
0.02
0.0007
0.01
0.1
0.01
0.09
0.02
1
0.4



Source a
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
IRIS b
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST
HEAST

Offsite(*)
Concentration
rng/m3
2.46E-03
6.78E-06
1.07E-05
4.35E-05
1.15E-05
1.59E-05
7.73E-06
4.64E-04
2.42E-04

Daily Intake
(DI)
mg/kg-day
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

Hazard
Quotient
DI/RfD
0.035002
0.002756
0.000304
0.000124
0.000327
0.000050
0.000110
0.000132
0.000172
0.039

Does Intake
Exceed RfD?
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO

EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure setting
Receptor
Body weight (kg)
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Volume of air inhaled/day (m3/day)
Volume of air inhaled per day per
kilogram of body weight (m3/kg-day)
Residential
Adult
70
0.83
24
20
0.2845714286









































a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
   HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables - Quarterly Summary. U.S. EPA 1989
b. No inhalation RfD available, based on ingestion RfD.
(*) Concentrations are modeled. See Appendix D.

-------
                                                            Table D-51
                                                      G & H LANDFILL SITE
                            OFFSITE EXPOSURES TO VOLATILES RELEASED FROM PHASE I LANDFILL
                                        EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK - INHALATION


Chemical
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
SUM OF RISKS
U.S. EPA
Carcinogen
Classification
A
B2
B2
B2
B2

Offsite(*) Lifetime Average
Slope Factor a Concentration Chemical Intake
(kg-day/mg) Source mg/m3 rag/kg-day
0.029 IRIS 1.19E-05 0.00
0.13 IRIS 6.78E-06 0.00
0.081 IRIS 1.07E-05 0.00
0.0033 HEAST 1.15E-05 0.00
0.013 IRIS 1.73E-04 0.00

Excess
Lifetime
Cancer Risk
1E-07
3E-07
2E-07
IE-OS
6E-07
1E-06
EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS
Exposure Setting
Inhalation rate (m3/hr)
Body weight (kilograms)
Time exposed (hrs/day)
Number of days per week
Number of weeks per year
Number of years exposed
Years in lifetime
Lifetime average air intake
(m3/kg body wt.- day)
Residential
0.83
70
24
7
52
70
70
0.2846





















a. Sources of Toxicity Values:
  IRIS - Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. EPA 1988.
  HEAST - Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. U.S. EPA 1989
b. Carcinogenic PAHs based on benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene potency from Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document.
  U.S. EPA 1980.
c. No inhalation potency. Cancer potency based on ingestion potency.
(*) Concentrations are modeled.  See Appendix D.

-------
                          Appendix E
                 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
GLT959/020.50-5

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
                              Appendix E
               ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
                           INTRODUCTION

This appendix presents the observations and a qualitative evaluation of potential
environmental concerns associated with the G&H Landfill site.  The goal of that
effort was to qualitatively determine if site-related  contaminants are present in
biota that could frequent the site or that may come in contact with contaminants
that have or are migrating from the site.  The sampling effort was related to
sampling biota that could be exposed to site related contaminants and was
qualitative to the extent that the analysis presents limited information. The
methodology was useful for determining only the presence or absence of
chemicals of concern in the animals, without confirming that the chemicals came
from the site.
                         PREVIOUS STUDIES

Limited environmental studies were conducted at the G&H Landfill site.  From
August through November 1983, fish  and invertebrates were sampled in the
Clinton River.  Mammals  were sampled south of the site, along the Clinton
River and in the  area of the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal. More fish were sampled
in September 1984.

In addition, a report on the impact the operations of Liquid Disposal, Inc., have
had on the Clinton River  was prepared in May 1986 by the Michigan DNR.
The report, which discussed fish  sampling efforts  and the results of tissue
analyses, is pertinent to the G&H site since the river is adjacent to the site and
fish sampling locations are upstream and downstream of the G&H Landfill site.
                                   E-l

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

Details of these sampling efforts can be found in Appendix H of the G&H
Landfill Interim RI Technical Report.
                  SITE  ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

The site is mainly an area of old field herbaceous and;shrubby vegetation.
Limited areas of upland woods are present near the perimeter of the landfill.
There is a large perennial pond just below the terrace that drops 15 to 20 feet
in elevation just south of the Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal.  It has been a
prominent feature in the Utica-Rochester Recreation Area since  at least 1955.
East of the pond are two  areas of wetlands that receive surface runoff from
culverts that extend beneath the canal. Southwest of the Phase III Landfill
there are  some old  oxbows of the Clinton River that are; perennial open water
bodies with wetland areas extending north along the toe of the Phase III
Landfill.   The wetland vegetation  present south and west of the site is generally
associated with the  Clinton River  and its  flood plain.  The wetlands are classified
by the National Wetlands Inventory as predominantly palustrine forested and
scrub/shrub types located  on  saturated to semipermanently flooded soils.

The property south of the site in  the Utica-Rochester Recreation Area has been
used for recreational or residential purposes.  This is evident  from  presence of
old building foundations, wrought iron  fences, and pilings for  w. hat  may have
been walkways  across the pond. There are also remnants of  old wells both on
the terrace and along the Clinton River.
The G&H Landfill is within the Clinton River watershed j^.The., Clinton River is
located s
St. Clair.
located south and west of the landfill, and it eventually drains .into Lake
                                    E-2

-------
             -.-.'A \'::•/.;7o,>                      AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

                POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS

Potential contaminant exposure sources for terrestrial and aquatic fauna include
subsurface soils, groundwater discharge, and oil seeps.  Terrestrial wildlife could
be exposed to contaminants through direct contact near the Oil Seep Area at
the southeastern corner of the site, where contaminated groundwater discharges
to surface ponds and wetlands.  Exposure could occur through direct contact or
ingestion.  Similar exposure could take place west of the Phase III Landfill in
the wetland area near the leachate seeps.

Contaminants could enter the pond or Clinton River and adjacent wetlands in
surface water runoff from the seep areas.  Fish, frogs, turtles, and various
aquatic invertebrates, and terrestrial animals such as birds, muskrats, raccoons,
and opossums could-thus be exposed.
              '  J±, U: ',-
               -. • •'! V-  •'•
                   -     SAMPLING EFFORTS
                   , .1

Mammals, fish,  and crayfish samples were taken near the G&H Landfill site
during the 1983 and 1984 sampling efforts.  Thirty-eight fish and 18 crayfish
were taken from the Clinton River, and 9 mammal samples were obtained from
areas adjoining  the site.  The following compounds were found in the tissues
from these animalsi " '':--ni:!
          • . I '-• !<•• ^ner'
      •      arsenic                         •     phenanthrene
      •      cadmium                        •     4,4'DDE
               . .«•-)   j..  ,.
      •      chrOmiurii'                       •     4,4'DDD
             lead;:rt; ni:  ;;                    •     4,4'DDT
      •      mercury                         •     Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
             PCBs (1254, 1260)               •     endrin
      •      2,4-diethyl phthalate             •     dieldrin
                                    E-3

-------
                                               AGENCY-REVIEW DRAFT
      •     bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate         •     -heptacnlbr expoxide
      •     pyrene                             	   .
                                                    '•c ?

The results of the aquatic sampling are presented in Table E-l; the mammal
sampling results are presented in Table E-2.           _

Soil, surface water, and groundwater at the site were tested for various
parameters, including those listed previously.  The results^ of those sampling
efforts are  discussed in Chapter 3.                 •;—-•;

Chromium  was present in all fish and macroinvertebrate  samples.  Lead was
found in 71 percent and mercury in 88 percent of the samples. Arsenic was
found in three fish and cadmium in six.             '•-'-•

Chromium  and lead were present in all crayfish sampled_and in most of the
mammals tested.  Mercury was found in three crayfish.  Cadmium was found in
two crayfish and four mammals.  Arsenic was detected in only one crayfish.
Arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury had been _ detected in some
groundwater and subsurface soil samples.

Dieldrin was present in most of the fish samples but was not detected in any
media sampled at the site. Endrin and heptachlor epoxide .were found once
each in two different mammals.  These chemicals were also detected in site soils.
Pyrene and phenanthrene, which were present in some of the subsurface soils,
were detected in two and three fish, respectively.  2,4-Diethyl phthalate was
detected in groundwater  and subsurface soil samples and* in four fish samples.
                                                 :!^H   •••
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected in the soil and in three of the fish and
three mammals. Gamma-BHC (Lindane) was found in groundwater samples
and in most of the fish samples.                          ;' if  ,;
                                    E-4

-------
                                                                     Table E-1
                                          CONCENTRATION OF COMPOUNDS IN CLINTON RIVER AQUATIC ORGANISMS
                                                               WHOLE TISSUE SAMPLES
                                                                      (ug/kg)
                                                                                            COMPOUNDS
Total
Sample - Weight Length Sample Percent
Number Species '.:'.' (grams) (cm) .- Type Upkts
FISH '£ o _. ::.': L-- £,
F1001 Northern Pike —• in 1500 r~62,"' ~" Fillet JJ'1.3
F1002 Northern Pike 3 JJ 1000 r'*> ,,< ^Fillet C3"l.1
F1003 Carp ; £-2100 -)54E^ ^-~™* ";2-4
F1004 Carp $ 2220 ,^,66 U| tJ-'Flllet £r6.6
F1005 Carp -, -"600 :33.6 O " Fillet f.3.1
F1006 White Sucker ~" »" 390 "31 -|- -> Fillet ^1.1
F1007 White Sucker 300 30.6 • Fillet 0.9
F1008 White Sucker 220 28 Fillet 0.1
F1009 White Sucker 290 28 Fillet 0.6
F1010-013 4 Common Shiners 59 Whole Fish 13.8
F1014 Walleye 1200 47 Fillet 1.4
F1015 Walleye 460 38 Fillet 0.7
F1016 Walleye 150 26 Fillet 1
F1017 Walleye 120 24 Fillet 1
F1018 Northern Pike 1300 58 Fillet 2.2
F1019-021 3 Common Shiners 96 Whole Fish 1.7
F1031 White Sucker 200 25.5 Fillet 0.6
F1032 White Sucker 165 25.5 Fillet 0.8
F1033 White Sucker 250 28.6 Fillet 0.7
F1034 White Sucker 250 29 Fillet 0.9
F1035 Carp 1500 48 Fillet 0.73
F1036 Carp 3000 61 Fillet 8.6
F1037 Carp 3400 60.5 Fillet 45.8
F1038 Carp 2500 59 Fillet 1.6
CRAYFISH
M1001 7 Crayfish Whole Animals 0.12
M1002 4 Crayfish Whole Animals 0.45
M1003 1 Crayfish Whole Animals 1.2
M1004 6 Crayfish Whole Animals O.S
M1005 1 Crayfish Whole Animals 0.6
2,4-Oiethyl
Phtnalate

367

170
; 278














92











Bis 2 ethyl
Hexyl
Phthalate

661
223



















1730








Phenan-
threne

59
,' --
" 139
'j- "I


























Pyrene


O
ET
£J-








284





236











Dteldrin

4
CT 3
C> 9
29
•-. 22

1
2

6
6
3
2

6





14
12
39







4.4'DOE

160
80
180
620
170
140
79
120
69
240
93
26
39
32
181
140
45
35
72
67
600
1017
3200
1073

46
103
29
52
96
4,4'DDO

110
. 30
"/)' 88.
..
', 76;
;. 45
22
45
27
78
38
6
11
11
52
24
12
9
33
23
603
606
2010
420


8

6
14
Qamma-
BHC
(Undone)

4
6
21
24
14
3
1
4
2
17
6
2
2
2
3
6
1
2
3


29
177







PCB-1264

620
300
1200
3700
•-JMO
(\960
"480
990
420
1200
430
198
280
606
1080
1006
662
147
118
109
1762
2330
227000
936

660
660
289
280
495
PCB-1260

670
390
2300
3300
.;, 270
610
200
420
120
770
280
128
180
269
466
617
296
248
660
460
3290
4630
2600
4660

66
91
158
124
285
Arsenic


.-.

^
:;

'-•








160






490


360




Cadmium

36

18
36






30










176
44




42
198

Chromium

410
"110
<270
,w270
I80
190
200
180
360
190
1700
120
940
160
270
140
90
360
440
190
320
240
230
290

260
ISO
300
270
170
Lead

120^
70
90
90
260-
234;
100


too
390

190
190
240
140
80
90
130
190
210
170
210
320

890
730
1900
1000
660
Mercury

'-•
160

80
J
' 270
200

80

360
680
80

260

110
100
70
230
70
170
200
250

60

50
50

NOTE: Adapted from Tables 4, 6,10, and 12 of Appendix H of the G&H Landfill Interim Rl Report.

-------
                                                                 Table E-2

                                 CONCENTRATION OF COMPOUNDS IN MAMMALS CAPTURED ADJACENT TO THE G&H LANDFILL

                                                           MUSCLE TISSUE SAMPLES

                                                                  (ug/kg)



                                                                                               COMPOUNDS
Body
Sample Weight Length Sample Percent
Number Species Sex (kilograms) (cm) Type Lipids
MAMMALS
W1001 Muskrat Male 0.75 23.5 Muscle Tissue 13.3
W1002 Muskrat Male 1 26 Muscle Tissue 9.6
W1003 Raccoon Female 3.5 42.5 Muscle Tissue 18
W1004 Opossum Female 3.4 44 Muscle Tissue 33.2
W1005 Opossum Female 1.85 40 Muscle Tissue 13.1
W1006 Opossum Female 2.35 43.5 Muscle Tissue 5.3
W1007 Raccoon Female 4.05 43.5 Muscle Tissue 11
W1008 Raccoon Female 4.55 43.5 Muscle Tissue 8.2
W1009 Opossum Male 2.25 42 Muscle Tissue 13.6
Bis 2 ethyl
Hexyl
Phthalate



20800
40900
7880



4.4'DDT


71

465
930

7300
2020
4,4'DDE
10
17
150

531
2060
464
7290
2950
4,4'DDD


12

71
51
110
450

Endrin




4




Heptachlor
Epoxide





59



PCB-1254






4330

637
PCB-1260


640

541
4460
850
966
220
Cadmium

44
184
37



29

Chromium
280
1500
360
1900
200
50
130
1400

Lead
560
200
240
1100
240
120

830
70
NOTE: Adapted from Tables 14 and 16 of Appendix H of the G&H landfill Interin Rl Report.
                                     O
                                     u
                                          V-,!
    .j  •—  ,J

,;~  o  K  g
 i.-  •"•'  pi  u
c
a.
                                                                                J-,
                                                                                                                         y.
                                                                                                                         ^*
                                                                                                                         •^

-------
                                              AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
All fish and crayfish tested contained both PCB-1254 and PCB-1260.  PCB-1254,
which was detected at the site, was found in two mammals; PCB-1260 was found
in six of the mammals tested.

The DDT derivatives 4,4'DDE and 4,4'DDT were detected in groundwater. All
fish and crayfish samples and 89 percent of the mammal samples showed the
presence of 4,4'DDE. An additional DDT derivative, 4,4'DDD, was present in
most of the fish samples, half of the crayfish samples, and over half the
mammals tested. Over half the mammals sampled also had 4,4'DDT.

The organic and inorganic substances detected in the fish and crayfish may have
been from the G&H Landfill site.  The mammals sampled have  home ranges
that include the site but also extend beyond the site boundaries.   (See
Appendix H of the G&H Landfill Draft RI Technical Report for further
information.)  For these reasons,  the presence of organic and inorganic
substances in the animal life near the G&H Landfill cannot be directly linked to
the site  as a primary source.  However, the potential for environmental exposure
exists, especially through exposure to contaminated soil, groundwater seeps, and
the resulting runoff of contaminated surface water.
      POTENTIAL AQUATIC IMPACTS FROM DISCHARGE
               OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

Groundwater sampling results for various organic and inorganic substances were
combined in the same manner as for Chapter 5, corresponding to the five areas
at the G&H Landfill site (see Tables E-3  to E-8).

Shallow groundwater from the site is thought to discharge to both the ponds and
wetlands south and west of the site and the Clinton River. The volume of
                                  E-5

-------
                                                                                   TableE-3
                                               COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
                                                                             G&H LANDFILL  - AREA 1
Chemical
ORGANICS:
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzene
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Diethylphthalate
Ethylbenzene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenol
Xylene (total)
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
,,»,
FOOTNOTES:
''"Site
Background
Concentration
for Inorganics
ug/l

88
18
188
2
708
1
81
1195


Area! ""
Concentration
Upper 95th
Percentile
ug/l
538.28
30.24
218.57
47.92
14.26
337.53
14.78
15.69
6659.37
98.87
57.95
900.29
6.00
23247.27
4.17
29.35
857.69
%• r-
8 -tO
(a) (b)
Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by by
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone. 0.1 x Cone.
-
750 (6)
360 (3)
-
16 (3)
-
197 (3) '
3124 (2) *
211 (4) *


11600
2120
5300
940
940
32000
5850
10200
87 (6)
190 (3) 3243
5000
11 (3)
1000 (1)
7.7 (3) '
162 (2)*
191 (4)*

..
3 LOEL-C LOEL-C
3 LOEL-C
2560 -
FWQC-C
812 -
_
_
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
_
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
^PfO
-
NCDTE'i-'TrWbackground concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
t< Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water,   jj-y;
^•.i .Assumed Hardness (mg         200             .,-^
(aij&T"  	   -  •'  --
                                                                                                  SeO
                                                                                                 two
                                                                 j  (.;.
                                                                            OOOi  '5'
       iral Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.          . .nr,
           •Quality Criteria for Water' (Red Book), U.S. EPA; July 1976
      Prom 45 FR 79318, November 1980.  Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
' ~~  ' shjHild.npt be exceeded at anytime.' Chronic crite^jori relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: .Acute criterion p(. K ,„,,;,.,,.,
      reflects a one hour average not tq.be. exceeded more^han once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
      concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
    (3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29,1985.
    (4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2,1987.
    (5) From 53 FR 177, January 5.1988.
    (6) From 53 FR 33177, August 30, 1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
    these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS:
 FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Acute
 FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
 LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
 LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic

-------
                                                                                  Table E-4
                                               COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
                                                                           G&H LANDFILL - AREA 2
•: "-Ji. 1!
fifcwjWQali i-n
ORMfc'£|^y;.\-
4,4'^pq^uoi, HMVrnir
B,ej)Ben»jin?qo^-; ",;
Napthalene
Phenol
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Iron
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Site
Background
., Concentration
'I.V-"..;.-.-. -.-1 •ug/C.rih ,.:;•
(-Ui-Xtl'J (i :. /i..V'(»i. i
•>i.'f)' n i;' "-by 1'"^
o!28 "
w«!0i: 12.50
6.40
4.85
327.45
104.89
528.34
17291.38
2.64
2393.00
197.35
(a) (b)
Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Criteria . ,,, .,, . ,,, Acute ^ .Chronic . by Existing by by
- ... ug/l ugl . I-*" -V ;«M9"..i. •!,,.:. '., ug/l.... ,. 1,-einui Concentration 0.01 x Cone. 0.01 x Cone.
C'!"-1:-' " '!•'
' IS.X
i.V p)1'1"'"
. T
750 (8)
360 (3)
197 (3)'
3124 (2) "
211 (4) *
.(,•«,!.{.-, 1(,IC«3- 105°
0.001 (2)
5300
250
10200
87 (6)
190 (3) 3243
5000
1000 (1)
7.7 (3)*
162 (2) *
191 (4) *
.••r'lrr-, (. •••:••!.' M|!IOj'
FWQC-C FWQC-C FWQC-C
50 -
2560 -
FWQC-C
812 -
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
FWQC-C FWQC-C
FWQC-C
FOOTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
 * Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
    Assumed Hardness (mg/l):      200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
   (1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water' (Red Book). U.S. EPA; July 1976
   (2) From 45 FR 79318. November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
       should not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: Acute criterion
       reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
       concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
   (3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29, 1985.
   (4) From 52 FR 6213. March 2, 1987.
   (5) From 53 FR 177, January 5,1988.
   (6) From 53 FR 33177. August 30.1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
   these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS:                                                                                     V
  FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria-Acute    "• WjVHI>?' :M  (                                •••/>•(... vs ii,'  ,t\%. i       '    •
  FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic                                        '• "
  LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
  LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic

-------
                                                                                    Table E-5
                                                  COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
                                                                              G&H LANDFILL - AREA 3
Chemical
ORGANICS:
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Ethyl benzene
Phenol
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Site
Background
Concentration
(or Inorganics
ug/l



88
18
188
2
708
1
81
1195
Area3
Concentration
Upper 95th
Percentile
ug/l

51.24
14.94
2.67
2.56
24.70
6.60
6.32
12.64

397.57
33.74
1214.31
5.36
34354.36
7.12
86.14
95.05
(a) (b)
Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by by
ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone. 0.01 x Cone.

-

750
360
-
16
-
197
3124
211



(«)
(3)

<3)

(3)'
*
<4)*

-

87
190
-
11
1000
7.7
162
191

2120
5300
250
28900
940
940
32000
10200

(6)
(3) 3243
5000
(3)
0)
(3)'
<2)'
W

50
1240
3 LOEL-C
3 LOEL-C
2560

FWQC-C
812
_
_
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
_ _
• n •- r*

-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
FOOTNOTES:                                   r.,.N
NOTE - The background concentrations ,were developed^ Chapter 3.
y.Cjjtflrjon is dependent on the hardness^)! the water,  ^-vio
                                                                              is-?
                                                                               RV
                                    200
jarFederal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
b!" (l)IFrom'Quality Criteria for Water'(Red Book), U.S. €PA; July 1976                  -              icsan             •.'"'Yj
S'"'(2VFTpm 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute crltefton reflects a concentration which
O».ie Vilinduld not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: Acute criterion
	   /9f[ep(8 a, one hour average ppt.to be exceeded nwije than once every 3 years on the averager Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average  (,7H,i
      concentration not to be exceede^fflore than.once in,3 years on the average.                         ......           -),<"•>><•           r>>
   (3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29. ,19815,,        ,.„!-.   ..
   (4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2, 1987.
   (5) From 53 FR 177, January 5.1988.
   (6) From 53 FR 33177. August 30.1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
   these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.
ABBREVIATIONS:
 FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Acute
 FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
 LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
 LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic
                                                                                                                                                   >  i :•?!..•
                                                                                                                                                                   (/ i x e'^r

-------
                                                                                  Table E-6
                                               COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
                                                                            G&H LANDFILL  - AREA 4
Site Areal (a) (b)
Background Concentration Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
(.I)-' ••: . . !
'JODvOII;I'i;;.;i. i
ORGANteSji • "'•" "" ««'•••
BenfeeWnll"*vky \OTM*
Phehdlt"?'1' ,O'!''fii>. •;'!!
lr^ORGtAN/C^:| -,t..j0r!' ,
^"jnln^nj, ,,. .(pijam^-mj
Arsenic . ,•• „,,,.,
Barium
Iron
Nickel
..Concentration Upper 95th Acute
,., fprlnorganjcs. .,. ,, ,f?ercenflle^ „,, . Criteria
1 *-..:,=.ij* HQ/I,,, .; . ,iv'..«.|f,n MBflU !!.«.! O:.rM . Ug/l ,
•{"•ifi'i MI ii'..'C!!if"(|4.Wal!t^r!"l'"'1 - •' ::i^!>"li '
O".i !"' M'"pS%t(t"»M<«oi- 232-40 7SO <6>
188 472.03
708 5385.91
81 21.60 3124 (2) *
Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by by
„•.-. MOfl . •-.,..,-, nmiMafl,!., :-,,<..... r. "8* .s'tn Concentration 0.1 x Cone. 0.1 x Cone.
•„•»..-.!<»•*.>«:•.->... !-:,,:c-i ;;xn ,- -R. v^«" ^'i-'!™>
>i!" .r"!--i"^ v'i"i'?>;'83(J8'!'!'>ur"''!"r:'-'l'CP-''7f!'": ***'"•=••'
10200 2560
IIQ^MUC? vohtoo'-r'
87 (6) - - FWQC-C
190 (3) 3243 812
5000 - -
1000 (1) - - FWQC-C
162 (2)' -

-
_
-
—
FOOTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
 * Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
    Assumed Hardness (mg         200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life. From the following sources.
   (1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water* (Red Book). U.S. EPA; July 1976
   (2) From 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
      should not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6:  Acute criterion
      reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
      concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
   (3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29,1985.
   (4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2.1987.
   (5) From 53 FR 177. January 5.1988.
   (6) From 53 FR 33177, August 30,1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
   these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.

ABBREVIATIONS:
  FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria-Acute
  FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
  LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
  LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic       ,,
                               ..   '•.  •       f.,..  ,i||i'in. :.                                           i  •
•-VHI3OH .  •
                                                                              •.'•••if-M I":  ~: t.r HIV I O!iv'Oi>VJiC p: lr M.'(  ! GO. HOI

-------
                                                                                  Table E-7
                                              COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
                                                                            G&HLANDFILL -  AREAS


r i

Chemical
ORGANICS:
Trichloroethene
INORGANICS:
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Iron
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
Site
Background
• ' • Concentration •
(or Inorganics
ug/l



88
18
188
2
708
0
81
1195
Areal
Concentration
. Upper 05th
Percent! le
ug/l

8.25

1454.95
8.85
296.90
41.10
9836.71
0.27
30.66
566.14

(a)
Federal Water Quality Criteria
Acute
Criteria
ug/l

-

750 (6)
360 (3)
-
16 (3)
-
2 (3)
3124 (2) *
211 (4) *
Chronic
Criteria
ug/l

-

87 (6)
190 (3)
-
11 (3)
1000 (1)
0.012 (3)
162 (2)'
191 (4) *

(b)

Lowest Reported Effects Level

Acute
ug/l

45000

-
3243
5000
-
-
-
-
"
Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
Chronic by Existing by
ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone.

_ _

FWQC-A, FWQC-C FWQC-C
812
_
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
FWQC-C
FWQC-C FWQC-C
_
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
Criteria Exceeded
by
0.1 x Cone.

-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-

FOOTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
 * Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
    Assumed Hardness (mg         200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria for Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life.  From the following sources.
   (1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water1 (Red Book). U.S. EPA; July 1976
   (2) From 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
      should not be exceeded at any lima. Chronic criterion jelects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6:, Acute criterion
      reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average  ' ' "'
     ' concentration not to be exceeded ifiore than once In Syears on the°average.        l05   ;'
                                                                                                                                 IvV.i '
'"
                                                '8 ™
                                            ««»yoo
                                                SMO
   t (3) From 50 FR 30784. July 29.1985.
',rMFrom 52 FR6213, March 2.1987^08
 V it) IrlW 53 FR 177- January 5.1988. °
v, eA?]from M FR 33177' August 30,1989.
(b) Npi'enough data was available to derFVfe a numerical n'dticflal water quality criteria for aquaffc life protection for"113
^' trje»9chemical8. Values reflect lowe^reported effe'cts'ie'vels. From 45 FR>9318. Novemb%> 1980.
                                                               te «•
                                                                            moo
                                                                              u
                                                                              4«
b'AOC--V
bf/.OC-V
                                                                                                                                  -Mor, -c
ABBREVIATIONS:  .. _		    		
  FWQ6-A:"Fe*)ral Water Quality Criteria - Acute    "a
  FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality CriteWtf- Chronte»'^»
  LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects fcevel - Acute: -i n
  LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic   :,
                                                                                                              fi'J\'
                                                                                                                         C ''
                                                                                                                                                 < C-'«:'
                                                                                                                                              ^uio
                                                                                                                                                                 0'" i' (JOUi-

                                                                                                                                                                     •^

                                                                                                                                                                 r;i   •• . f •-, ,-,,.,J(

-------
                                                                                  Table E-8
                                              COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER TO CRITERIA FOR AQUATIC LIFE PROTECTION
                                                                         G&H LANDFILL -  LEACHATE WELLS
!"' ;'•
liUKd
INOR
Chr»
Cop$
Nicke
Silver
Zinc
Site Areal (a) (b)
-v . Background . Concentration Federal Water Quality Criteria Lowest Reported Effects Level
.., <:,,, ^concentration! Upper 95th Acute Chronic Criteria Exceeded Criteria Exceeded
;t -C i i • : ,"'" ! TfodTriorgahrbs^ i • Percentile Criteria Criteria Acute Chronic by Existing by
'"CherriicaV-''"1 '''"-'" :' 'i!:Nug/r'll!/"^'"'!l'' ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l Concentration 0.1 x Cone.
SANICS:
Jj«ii83fca33Jn-vnC.-A3fJ8B|' j^ ^ ,3,
RWi'WfcH IV, W''i3l*2 .|369'0 214Q 16 pjj
, ."', bH6S'3 '^'^.I'.^OS 40067.00
•f'KI. f l_i f^y "O^P^I '! • v^t'' «sitl? 4 4A jIA 4OY tfi\ •
1 18.40 197 (3)
• .'; t);'!'-1|!0li 1101 /'.i pi' Ovv:ooq'^ll^(:|iJ (pit; C'K. iiu gi«tllg oil l!"»«»i '.v •
" ..0. ..„„.„.; r,,.2.K»,,.,,...ir,, 	 13 (2)'
1195 ,,686.30 , 211 (4) *

>• ', '"l<\yip IM9 tiiofaci!0" <^43
11 (3)
11 (3)
1000 (1)
7.7 (3)'
162 po-
ll -i •","' • • >•"••• • i-.nsci
191 (4) *
FWQC-A. FWQC-C FWQC-C
812
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
FWQC-A. FWQC-C
FWQC-C FWQC-C
FWQC-C
^O.i2Vrl .^I^EL-C LOEL-C
- ' 'FWQC-A. FWQC-C
Criteria Exceeded
by
0.1 x Cone.
-
FCXDTNOTES:
NOTE - The background concentrations were developed in Chapter 3.
 * Criterion is dependent on the hardness of the water.
    Assumed Hardness (mg        200
(a) Federal Water Quality Criteria lor Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life.  From the following sources.
   (1) From 'Quality Criteria for Water* (Red Book), U.S. EPA; July 1976
   (2) From 45 FR 79318, November 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Availability of Documents. Acute criterion reflects a concentration which
      should not be exceeded at any time. Chronic criterion relects an average concentration over a 24-hour period. Footnotes 3-6: Acute criterion
      reflects a one hour average not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years on the average. Chronic criterion reflects a 4-day average
      concentration not to be exceeded more than once in 3 years on the average.
   (3) From 50 FR 30784, July 29.1985.
   (4) From 52 FR 6213, March 2,1987.
   (5) From 53 FR 177, January 5,1988.
   (6) From 53 FR 33177, August 30,1989.
(b) Not enough data was available to derive a numerical national water quality criteria for aquatic life protection for
   these chemicals. Values reflect lowest reported effects levels. From 45 FR 79318. November 1980.

ABBREVIATIONS:
  FWQC-A: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Acute
  FWQC-C: Federal Water Quality Criteria - Chronic
  LOEL-A: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Acute
  LOEL-C: Lowest Observable Effects Level - Chronic  ,'ij:          y                .                                            „,,.,
MHv'in, !
                                                                                               ,'HCY -
                                                                                               i1? l-OLf VOflV.tir I'll.!.' H.*Oj!-'C.ll(H-l

-------
                                                AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT

groundwater discharging and the potential dilution of groundwater in these
surface water bodies is not known.  Leachate from the Phase I Landfill is
believed to discharge to the wetlands south of the landfill. The wetlands drain
to the Clinton River.

To assess  the potential for aquatic impacts from the discharge of contaminated
groundwater and leachate, contaminant concentrations in those media were
compared to federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria for aquatic life protection.
Where criteria do not exist, the concentrations were compared to the lowest
observed effects levels published (U.S. EPA 1980).

Comparisons were made for five groundwater areas (see Appendix B for
discussion and summary of data) and for the leachate wells.  The groundwater
concentration used was the 95th percentile for the arithmetic mean and  the
average of the three leachate wells.  Because the potential dilution of
groundwater with leachate is not known,  the groundwater concentrations were
compared to criteria assuming no dilution, dilution by l/10th and dilution by
l/100th.  The results are presented in Tables E-3 through E-8.

Several chemicals in undiluted groundwater exceed the criteria.  They are
aluminum, di-n-butyl phthalate, diethylphthalate, iron,  zinc, DDT, chromium, and
mercury.  DDT and iron exceed criteria at l/100th of this groundwater
concentration.  In the leachate, criteria are exceeded by undiluted leachate
concentration for aluminum, chromium, copper, iron, lead, silver, and zinc.  Only
iron exceeded its criterion at l/100th of the  leachate concentration.

This analysis indicates that, depending on the actual volume of groundwater
discharge  and dilution in the surface water, there may be a potential for aquatic
impacts for the discharge of groundwater and leachate.

GLT959/004.50
                                     E-6

-------