UniMdl                        AMMphwIe R«i«aretJ and
•nvtaonmOTtt                  AMMMmmi Ubontoiy
Agmcy
R«s»arch and Devttopment          November igoi
                                             EPA 600/3-91/074

PROJE|CT REPORT
THE ROLE OF CLIMATE  IN FOREST MONITORING AND

ASSESSMENT?   A  MEW ENGLAND EXAMPLE

-------
       THE ROLE OF CLIMATE IN FOREST MONITORING AND
            ASSESSMENT:  A NEW ENGLAND EXAMPLE
                Ellen J. Cooler, Sharon K. LeDuc, Lawrence Truppi1
                      Ecosystem Exposure Research Division
              Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory
                      Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
                                   27711
                              Donald R. Block2
                             UNISYS Corporation
                          Research Triangle Park, NC
                                   27709
                               November 1991
I/ On Assignment from the Air Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
   Administration
21 Work completed while employed by ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research
   Triangle Park, NC

-------
                           DISCLAIMER
     The information in this document has  been  funded in part by
the United States Environmental Protection Agency under contract
number  68-02-444.   It has  been subjected  to Agency  review and
approved for publication.   Mention of trade  names  or commercial
products does not constitute endorsement or  recommendation for use.

-------
                            ABSTRACT
     The  development  of  climatological  information products  to
support ecological data collection and analysis is described.  The
scope of research is narrowed to issues of direct interest to the
joint U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Monitoring
and Assessment Program and  U.S.  Department of Agriculture Forest
Service New England Forest Health Monitoring program.

     Characteristics of climatological persistence and recurrence
that  are  especially critical  to New  England forest health and
productivity are  identified.   These  include physical disturbance
events (tornadoes, high winds and wet snowfall),  drought, growing
degree  days and  late  spring  freezes.  Climatological   data  are
assembled and presentations developed based on the analysis issue
to be addressed: background (status and persistence); most recent
decade (short-term trends); and  most recent sampling year (near-
term  impacts).    A  Geographic  Information  System  is   used  for
presentation, data management and analysis.

     Major research findings focus on  the  application of climate
data and products  to operational ecological  monitoring and analysis
situations.    Possible future  activities  are identified  in the
areas of new climatologies, program design,  database acquisition or
development and applied research.  All these efforts would result
in significant contributions to the development of a more coherent
theory of natural disturbance and ecosystem response.
                               111

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT	  ill

List of Figures	  vi

List of Tables	  ix

Acknowledgements	  x

I.   Background	   1

     A.  Project Overview	   1

     B.  Conceptual Frameworks and Definitions for
         Forest/Climate Research	   2
          1.   Definitions	   2
               a.   Weather and Climate	   2
               b.   Scale	   3
                    - mesometeorological events	   3
                    - synoptic events	   3
                    - landscapes	   3
                    - patches	   4
               c.   Disturbance	   4
                    - spatial distribution	  11
                    - disturbance frequency	  11
                    - size of area	  12
                    - magnitude	  14
          2.  Conceptual Frameworks	  14
               a.   Dynamic Stability	  15
               b.   Recurrence and Persistence	  17
               c.   Theories of Catastrophe and  Chaos	  18
               d.   Temporal and  Spatial  Hierarchies	  19

     C.  Summary	  20
                                IV

-------
II.  Data and Methodology	  21

     A.  Targeting the Study	  21

     B.  Data Resources	  24
          1.  Severe Weather	  25
          2.  Tropical Cyclones	  30
          3.  Drought	  34
          4.  National Weather Service Cooperative
              Network Data	  36
               a.  Growing Degree Days	  41
               b.  Last Spring Freeze	  41
               c.  Last Spring Snowfall	  43
     C.  Display Technology (CIS)	  44

     D.  Summary	  45


III.  Example Disturbance Climatologies	  46

     A.  Introduction	  46

     B.  Baseline Conditions (1961-1990)	  46
          1.  Severe Weather and Tropical Cyclones	  47
          2.  Temperature and Precipitation	  50
          3.  Drought	  57
          4 .  Growing Degree Days	  58
          5.  Last Spring Freeze	  64
          6.  Last Spring Snowfall	  64

     C.  Most Recent Decade (1981-1990)	  70
          1.  Severe Weather and Tropical Cyclones	  71
          2.  Combined Stress Analysis	  72
          3.  Summary	  78

     D.  Most Recent Year (1990)	  82
          1.  October 1989 through September 1990 Weather	  82
          2 .  Historical Comparison	  83
          3.  Summary and Comparison to Monitored Data	  87


IV-  Report Summary and Future Work	  90


V -   References	 93

Appendix A.   FUTURE RESEARCH	  100

Appendix B.   CLIMATE DATA AND RESEARCH BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR
              THE NEW ENGLAND STATES	  103

-------
                         List of Figures


1.   Developmental pathways of riparian forest patches
     in response to frequent and infrequent disturbances
     (after:  Wissmar and Swanson, 1990)	 13

2.   Mechanical dynamic stability in terms of potential
     energy (Godron and Forman, 1983)	 15

3.   (a) Disturbance regimes, (b) forest processes,
     (c) environmental constraints and  (d)vegetation
     patterns, viewed in the context of space-time
     domains  (after:  Gosselink,  etal.,1990)	 20

4.   The New  England Forest Health Monitoring Program
     network of potential sampling sites	23

5.   Digitized location of  severe weather  events, 1961-1990.... 26

6.   Intersections of digitized severe weather events
     with NEFHM Program sampling  hexagons, 1961-1990	 28

7.   Location of tornado touchdown and path within a
     forest sampling hexagon in southwestern New Hampshire,
     1981-1990	29

8.   North Atlantic cyclone tracks for 1938
     (Neumann et al. ,  1990)	 32

9-   The influence of weather related disturbance events
     on a mixed coniferous and broadleaf deciduous forest
     in New Hampshire (after Woodward, 1987)	 33


10.  Distance between "nearest" cooperative temperature
     observation sites and  potential NEFHM sampling hexagons... 38

11.  Distance between "nearest" cooperative precipitation
     observation sites and  potential NEFHM sampling hexagons... 39

12.  Relative intra-annual frequency of tornado and damaging
     wind events in New England,  1961-1990	 47

13.  Distribution of tornado intensity for New England,
     1961-1990	48

14.  Mean annual New England precipitation, 1961-1990	51

15.  Mean annual maximum New  England temperature, 1961-1990.... 53

16.  Mean annual minimum New  England temperature, 1961-1990.... 54

                               vi

-------
34.  Percentage of New England region impacted by
     climate stress, 1961-1970	78

35.  Distribution of hexagon and climate event
     intersections, 1961-1970	79

36.  Location of hexagons reporting four or more
     intersections with climate disturbances, 1961-1970	80

37.  1990 annual maximum temperature departure from
     30-year average conditions	84

38.  1990 annual minimum temperature departure from
     30-year average conditions	85

39.  1990 annual precipitation departure from 30-year
     average conditions	86

40.  Potential forest sampling hexagons represented by
     precipitation recorded at Squapan Dam, Maine	 88
                               Vlll

-------
17.   Area weighted time series of annual New England
     precipitation, 1961-1990	55

18.   Area weighted time series of annual minimum
     New England temperatures, 1961-1990	55

19.   Area weighted time series of annual maximum
     New England temperatures, 1961-1990	56

20.   Area weighted time series of annual New England
     temperature range,  1961-1990	56

21.   Area weighted time series of mean growing season
     PDSI, 1961-1990	59

22.   Monthly PDSI values for New England with a 1 in
     100 year chance of  occurrence, 1895-1990	 60

23.   Duration of New England drought episode (PDSI with
     consecutive months of -2.0 or less) with a 1 in
     100 event chance of occurrence, 1895-1990	 61

24.   Mean annual growing degree days (base = 10°C,
     lower limit = 0°C) , 1961-1990	 62

25.   Area weighted time series of annual growing degree
     days (base = 10°C,  lower  limit = 0°C) , 1961-1990	 63

26.   Mean date of last spring hard freeze (minimum
     temperature of -2.2°C or  less) , 1961-1990	 65

27.   Area weighted time series of last spring hard
     freeze event dates (minimum temperature of
     -2.2°C or less) ,  1961-1990	66

28.   Mean date of last spring  snowfall, 1961-1990	 67

29.   Area weighted time series of last spring snowfall
     dates, 1961-1990	69

30.   Percent of New England region impacted by climate
     stress, 1981-1990	72

31.   Monthly PDSI values for New England with a 1 in
     20 year chance of occurrence, 1895-1990	73

32.   Distribution of hexagon and climate event
     intersections, 1981-1990	 75

33.   Location of hexagons reporting four or more
     intersections with climate disturbances, 1981-1990	77
                               VII

-------
                          List  of Tables

1.   Natural disturbances and associated ecosystems
     present in the northeastern U.S. for which
     studies are reviewed in Pickett and White (1985)	  7

2.   Some correlated disturbance,  population and life
     history characteristics in plant communities
     (from Bazzaz,  1983)	  8

3.   Examples of climatic variables shown to affect
     tree growth (Peer, 1990)	  9

4.   Proposed climatological variables, data and
     ecological responses (Solomon, 1984)	10

5.   USDA Forest Service New England Forest Health and
     Monitoring Program objectives  (USDA, n.d.)	24

6.   Examples of climate disturbance (stress) products
     for New England (see Chapter III)	45

7.   Elements of a New England disturbance regime
     climatology for which baseline examples have been
     developed	46

8.   Tropical cyclones impinging on the New England
     states, 1961-1990	49

9.   Elements of a New England disturbance regime
     climatology for which decadal examples have been
     developed	71

10.  Elements of a 1990 New England disturbance regime
     climatology	82
                                IX

-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
     The authors wish to thank Keith Eggleston of the New England
Regional  Climate  Center  for providing  the  1990  New  England
Climatological data,  Richard Livingston and Preston Leftwich of the
National Weather  Service for  providing the digitized  storm data
through 1989 and Vince Miller  of the Weather Channel for providing
1990 preliminary storm data.  Thanks  also  go  to  Karl Hermann for
additional GIS assistance and George Mapp for database programming.

-------
I.   Background


I.A.  Project Overview


     The  primary goal  of  this  report  is  to  define a  working
hypothesis   of  climate/ecosystem   interactions  suitable   for
operational environmental monitoring programs.  Such an exercise is
necessary  before climate research and  analysis  can become  an
integral  part of these programs.     Although  the  research  has
focussed on  a  specific  cooperative EPA and  USDA sampling project
initiated  during 1990,  insights  are  provided  pertinent  to  the
general topic of climate/biosphere interactions.

     The  approach  adopted  is to  establish a  common ground  of
concepts  and.  terminology  to  facilitate exchanges   between  the
climatological and ecological  communities.   This is  accomplished
through the careful definition of key terms and a discussion of the
role of  climate in  current ecological theory  (see  section  I.E.
below).  The discussion provides  an  avenue  for  identifying major
environmental  policy  issues,  establishing  which of these  are
significantly  climate  related,    and  initiating  work   on  the
necessary data and analysis products.

     The hypothesis that  is developed is that the relationship of
climate  (the synthesis  of weather)  to ecosystems  depends  on the
time and space scale of the biological system to be monitored and
the analyses to be performed.  Climatological averages and ranges
reflect  one set of  physical  bounds  on  the number  of  possible
ecosystem  states represented  within  a  landscape.   Inter-annual
climate variability  acts  as ecosystem disturbances.   Disturbance
phenomena impact ecosystem health and productivity as measured by
changes in growth, system  energetics,  plant populations and  species
characteristics.  Disturbance events  impact the persistence and
recurrence  of ecological states.   Disturbance  events vary  with
geographic location and can be described by their frequency,  size
and magnitude.   Many EMAP and FHM indicators,  particularly those
based on  directly monitored  observations,  may  not  be  correctly
interpreted  and valid associations drawn without consideration of
mitigating or compounding climatological factors. A climatological
description  of background persistence and disturbance regimes is
essential  if associative  (EMAP)  or   predictive  modeling  studies
(FHM) are  to include natural as well as anthropogenic  forces of
ecosystem change.

     This  hypothesis  is  illustrated with data  drawn   from  a
particular region.  The  focus of this effort  is the presentation of
relatively  familiar  climatological   products  and  ideas  in  new
ecological  contexts.     Chapter  II  describes the  cooperative
Environmental  Monitoring and  Assessment Program  (EMAP)  and New
England Forest Health Monitoring (NEFHM) programs, presents  current

-------
data  resources,  future data  resources,  analysis  techniques  and
display technologies  which may be  employed.   The  summaries  and
analysis  products  themselves are  presented in  Chapter III.    A
summary   and  listing   of   future   research   and   application
opportunities suggested by this reported are provided in  Chapter IV
and Appendix A.   Additional climatological  references of potential
interest for work in the New England area  are presented in Appendix
B.
I.E. Definitions  and  Conceptual  Frameworks  for  Forest/Climate
     Research

I.B.I.  Definitions

     Because  the study  of climate/ecosystem  interactions  is  a
rapidly  evolving  field,   terms  must  be  carefully  defined  and
judiciously used.  The definitions that follow have been selected
to establish a common language to facilitate communication between
ecological  and climatological  communities.   As  such,  some may
appear to be intuitively obvious.   Others represent the selection
of one particular use from several possibilities.  All provide the
building   blocks  for   research   into   (1)   climate/ecosystem
interactions,  (2) the role of climate and climate research in EMAP
and  (3) the role of EMAP and ecology in climate change detection,
analysis and impact assessment.


I.B.I.a.  Weather and Climate

     Weather is the state of the atmosphere, mainly with respect to
its  effects  upon life and human  activities  (Huschke  1989) .   As
distinguished  from climate, weather  consists  of the  short-term
(minutes to months) variations of the atmosphere.

     Climate,  on the other hand, is the synthesis of the weather.
It is the long-term manifestation of weather (Huschke, 1989) .  More
rigorously, the climate of a specified area is represented by the
statistical collective of its weather conditions during a specified
interval of time (usually  several decades).

     These are important distinctions for climate/forest research.
Although the weather  event  of interest may take  place over the span
of minutes (severe weather) or months  (drought), forest ecosystems
may often respond  on  the  order  of  seasons  to decades.   Thus, the
appropriate means  of analysis  is  generally climate  rather than
weather.  But, as implied  by the definition of climate, this does
not mean that we are limited to analyses of "average" conditions,
(although for  very long-term large  area studies this may provide
the most useful information).   By definition, climate includes

-------
weather variables that  describe  the state of the atmosphere over
time.  This is done through comparison to itself  (normal, deviation
from  normal,  extremes,  variability)  or through  associations  of
weather  variables  (i.e.,  a  synthesis  of  weather  conditions).
Examples of the  latter  would  include the Palmer Drought Severity
Index  or  Showalter Stability Index.   In each  case,  a synthetic
variable or measure of  atmospheric condition has been constructed
as a function of several coincident atmospheric conditions.


I.B.l.b.  Scale

     The resolution of ecological and environmental time and space
scales is a critical issue for climate impact assessment research.
Many discussions are available in the  literature, but Rosswall et
al.  (1988)  contains  a  recent   collection   of  essays that  deal
directly with the resolution of scale to address integrated global
change issues.

     Mesometeorological   events   occur   between  meteorological
stations, or at least well beyond the  range  of normal observation
from a single point  (Huschke, 1989).   The types of major weather
phenomena  that  are small  enough to  remain undetected  within a
normal observation  network include  tornadoes,  thunderstorms and
immature  tropical cyclones.   This  scale  also  includes  events
associated with local geographic  influences such as isolated areas
of freezing temperatures or flash flooding.  Fujita (1989) includes
events occurring in the range of  50  to 500 km, with duration of 30
min to 5 days and maximum winds of 25  to 60 m s"1.

     Synoptic (cyclonic) scale events include the migratory high
and  low  pressure  systems of  the  lower troposphere, with  wave
lengths of 1000 to 2500 km.  This scale would also include events
resulting  from  the presence  of these systems such  as  drought,
freezing precipitation,  freezing temperatures, general flooding and
hurricanes.  Fujita (1989)  includes events ranging from 200 to 2000
km, lasting 1 to  15 days with maximum windspeeds ranging from  10 to
90 m s"1.

     Landscapes are heterogeneous land areas composed of a cluster
of  interacting  ecosystems that  are  repeated  in  similar  form
throughout (Forman and Godron, 1986).  Landscape ecology deals with
large, connected areas and emphasizes spatial patterns  and spatial
interactions.   Landscape  ecology  often focuses  on  studies  of
spatial  patterns  subject  to  some  combination  of   natural  and
anthropogenic  disturbances.     This  contrasts  with  the  term
"ecosystem" which is  used  to  emphasize more localized biotic and
abiotic functional interactions.   There is  considerable overlap in
the two terms  (ecology and landscape ecology) since spatial pattern
and ecological process are  inseparable.  Both are influenced by the
scale of inquiry.  One example of such a complex system is a river.

-------
A river is a complex system of many parts that function together as
an  integrated whole.   Headwaters,  upland slopes,  floodplains,
terraces,  and river  channels are  all  spatially  and structurally
integrated  and  interrelated.    River  systems  cannot  be  fully
understood  by  a  study   of   these   individual   parts;   their
interrelationship  is  a  fundamental   property   of  the  system
(Gosselink, etal., 1990).  Woodward (1987), IGBP  (1990) and others
state that climate (the long-term synthesis of weather) impacts the
distribution,   persistence and  recurrence  of  vegetation  on  the
landscape  scale.    Given  this  definition,   then,  appropriate
climatological  products  for  landscape  analysis   could  include
regional  summaries (maps) of climate  means, extremes, ranges and
other relevant statistics.

     Patches are plant and animal communities surrounded by  an area
with  a similar  community structure  or composition  (Godron  and
Forman, 1983).   Patches may  or may not have distinct boundaries.
Distinct  patch types  in natural vegetation are normally produced
through a  variety of mechanisms.  Spot disturbance patches result
from disturbance  of  small areas.   Environmental  resource patches
result from the heterogeneous spatial distribution of environmental
resources.  Remnant  patches result from disturbance surrounding
small areas.   In natural vegetation influenced minimally by human
activities, patches are generally long,  narrow, irregular in shape
and few in number. They are caused by a  number of natural factors
including  fire, insect outbreaks or hurricanes.

     Concepts  bearing on  patch definition and  patch dynamics are
summarized in a  volume  edited by Pickett  and  White (1985).   The
range of  essays  presented describe dynamics that span a temporal
scale of 10 to 1000 years  and spatial scales of 10"*  to 106 m2.  This
range reflects the variety of biological systems and the variety of
scales  within each system  on  which disturbance  effects usually
occur.  Shugart et al.  (1988)  propose that mesoscale  climate is
appropriate for  gap  or patch  dynamics  analysis  and successional
models.  The analysis of certain synoptic scale  events should be of
value for  these activities as well.
I.E.I.e.  Disturbance

     Disturbance,  as  defined by Forman and Godron  (1987) ,  is an
event that causes  a significant change from the normal pattern in
an ecological system  such  as an ecosystem or  landscape.   This is
nearly  identical to the  definition of ecosystem stress  (Barrett,
1981).  Climatologists would more than likely choose to  call such
an event  a perturbation rather than disturbance,  but  White and
Pickett  (1985)   contend  that  the  use   of  perturbation   in  an
ecological  setting is,  most  often,  inappropriate.  In  general,
perturbation  has  been  used  by ecologists  with a whole-system
orientation in the  sense  of any change in a defining  characteristic

-------
of  a  system.   The problem  with applying  this term  to  natural
systems is that it is difficult to separate perturbation from the
background variance in system parameters.  White and Pickett (1985)
suggest limiting the use of perturbation to very narrowly defined
situations.  They propose the following definition:  A disturbance
is any relatively discrete event in time that disrupts ecosystem,
community or population structure and changes resources, substrate
availability or the physical environment.  This definition includes
environmental fluctuations and destructive events, whether or not
these are perceived as "normal" for a particular system.  This is
particularly  important   for   relatively   rare  but  large-scale
destructive  events  such as hurricanes and  massive  flooding that
might  be  omitted  under the Forman  and  Godron definition.   To
establish  a  common  basis  throughout   this   report  the  term
disturbance will  be used as defined by White  and Pickett.   This
means that a disturbance can be a climatological perturbation, but
it is not a  necessary condition  for  the event  to be of interest.
The remainder of  this discussion will  focus on developing a more
precise  definition  of  climatological  disturbances  and  their
relationship to ecosystem health and productivity.

     To restate an important point, a disturbance is any relatively
discrete  event  in  time that  disrupts  ecosystem,  community,  or
population structures  and changes resources,  substrate availability
or  the  physical  environment.    The  most  obvious  role  that
disturbance plays in ecosystems is in the deflection  of a community
from  some otherwise  predictable  successional  path  (Pickett and
White, 1985; also see  section I.B.2.C.).   Models that describe the
successional implications of disturbance are discussed in Shugart
et al. (1988).

     Gap models are a  subset of a class of  forest succession models
called individual-tree models because the  models follow the growth
and fate of individual trees.  Under optimal growth conditions, the
growth of a tree is assumed to occur at a rate that will produce an
individual of maximum recorded age and  diameter.   Modifications
reducing this optimal growth are  imposed on each tree based on the
availability of light and, depending on the specific model, other
resources.  Depending on the specific model,  growth may be further
reduced as climate  stochastically  varies.   Shugart  et al.  (1988)
limit  their  discussion  to mesoscale  meteorological  phenomena
including tropical cyclones, mesoscale convective complexes, severe
thunderstorms and frozen precipitation.  Such events may generate
dramatic  changes  in  the  successional  framework, but  other more
subtle factors such as drought or unfavorably cool or wet growing
season  conditions  that  can   impact  general  forest  health and
productivity over an extended period of time are omitted.  Michaels
and Hayden (1987) discuss climatological data sources and suggest
ways  in which  acute climate disturbances  can  be introduced into
such successional models.  Chronic  stress  has been simulated using
the FORET  (a tree growth and development model) by modifying the
growth curves of specific individuals or species by a fixed percent

-------
and following  the  impact on primary  productivity  and population
distribution (Auerback, 1981).

     Table 1,  adapted  from White  and  Pickett,  lists some natural
disturbances  and  the  ecosystem  in  which  literature  has  been
reviewed that  fit  this broader definition of  disturbance.   Only
weather related disturbances and terrestrial ecosystems represented
in the Northeastern U.S.  have been included.  Note that chronic as
well as acute  climatological disturbances have been included.

     Table 2,  adapted  from  Bazzaz  (1983)  contains a  summary of
correlated    disturbance,    population,    and    life    history
characteristics in plant communities.   Bazzaz  (1983) describes in
some  detail  the  role  of  disturbance  in  the determination  of
population characteristics.   Reiners  (1983)  presents  a similar
discussion for ecosystem energetics.   This  includes  measures of
ecosystem productivity such  as  above  and  below ground biomass as
well as  other  soil chemistry measurements.   Similar  studies for
aquatic as well as terrestrial ecosystems are  summarized in Barrett
and Rosenberg  (1981).   Pickett  and White  (1985) summarize a number
of  essays  concerning natural  disturbance  and patch  dynamics by
saying  that  disturbance  has demonstrated  effects on  community
characteristics,  including richness, dominance, and structure.  The
functional attributes  of ecosystems  are  also governed  to  some
extent by disturbance.   Nutrient cycling and energetics respond to
disturbance  as well as  to  biotic and abiotic  opportunities and
limiting factors.

     Table 3,  adapted from Peer (1990),  contains a summary of the
role of  climate  in recent forest growth models.   Table 4,  taken
from Solomon  et al.  (1984), contains relationships between specific
climatological variables (means, frequencies,  extremes) and various
forest response indicators.   This kind of information, in addition
to that  presented  in  Table  2 and  discussed  in Reiners  (1983)  is
particularly  critical   if  disturbance  climatologies are to  be
related  to monitoring  programs such as  EMAP  and FHM.   Proper
interpretation   of  field   samples   lead   to  more   accurate
identification of trends and  potential sources  of ecosystem stress
for policy analysis and  for  detection of  local manifestations of
global environmental change  (e.g., greenhouse warming).   Although
model development  is  not a  primary goal of this  study,  climate
analyses  that directly  support   the integrated  assessment  of
ecosystem  status  and   trends  can  lead   to  a  more  complete
understanding  of   forest/climate  relationships   and   to   the
development of more accurate models of  natural and anthropogenic
influences on  forest dynamics.

-------
Table l.  Natural disturbances and associated ecosystems present in
          the northeastern U.S. for which studies are reviewed in
          Pickett and White  (1985).
Disturbance
Fire
Hurricane
Other windstorms
Ice storm
Ice Push on shores
Freeze damage
Fluctuating water levels in
basins
Droughts
Alluvial processes
Coastal processes
Salinity changes
Insect outbreaks
Disease
Ecosystem of geographical area
Boreal forest
Temperate forest
Coastal plain
Terrestrial
Temperate forest
Temperate forest
Temperate and Boreal forests
Various
Various
Temperate forest
Various
Various
Various
Various
Deciduous forest

-------
Table 2.  Some correlated disturbance, population, and life history
          characteristics in plant communities (from Bazzaz, 1983).
  A.  Disturbance characteristics with relevance to plant response
        Size
        Intensity
        Frequency, regularity and predictability of occurrence
        Duration
        Seasonal time of occurrence
        Level of environmental heterogeneity within the disturbed
          area
        Nature of the biotic neighborhood
  B.  Population characteristics responsive to disturbance
        Density and dispersion
        Growth rate
        Survivorship; age and size structure
        Levels of gene flow in the population
        Degree of relatedness among the members of the population
        Organization of variation within the population
        Strength of competitive interactions
        Niche breadth and niche overlap
        Strength of interactions with other trophic levels
      Plant  life history characteristics responsive to disturbance
        Spatial and temporal dispersal ability
        Seed germination
        Seedling establishment and growth
        Reproductive strategies
             Breeding system
             Fecundity
             Reproductive allocation and packaging
                                8

-------
Table 3.  Examples of climatic variables shown to affect tree growth  (Peer, 1990)
CLIMATIC
VARIABLES
Fall precipitation =>1.3cm
Cold falls and winters
July precipitation
High June precipitation
Low fall rainfall
Intense summer precipitation
Cumulative air temp, degree days
Total precipitation
Monthly average temperature
Total rainfall
June temp, previous year
November temp, previous year
January temp, current year
July precip. previous year
March precip. current year
June precip. current year
July precip. current year
34 variables based on monthly
temperature and precipitation
SPECIES AND LOCATION
conifers (8 species)
Minnesota, Wisconsin, and
Michigan
hardwoods (14 species) same
locations as above
red maple (Acer rubrum) ,
northern red oak (Quercus rubra) ,
paper birch (Betula papyrifera) ,
all in northern Michigan
red spruce (Smoky Mountains)
hemlock (Pennsylvania)
European silver fir
(Bad Herenalb, FOR)
DEPENDENT
VARIABLE
diameter at
breast
height (dbh)
diameter
growth
tree ring
width
tree ring
width
tree ring
width
COMMENTS
Corr. coef. did not
exceed .42; Species varied
in climate sensitivity;
generally conifers more
sensitive than hardwoods
Proportion of variance
explained by regression
ranged from .44 to .65
Demonstrated that climate
sensitivity varied over
time
R-square=.64; hemlock is a
climatically sensitive
species
Method suitable for
dealing with both change
and sudden shocks

-------
 Table  4.    Proposed  climatological variables,  data  and  ecological  reponses   (Solomon,  1984).
                                                Affedted organisms,
                                            life-stage, or  environmental
                                                     varieties
                                           Primary
                                          responses
                                                  Secondary
                                                  responses
Climate variables
  Tenperature variables

    Frequency,  intensity of winter low
     temperature

    Frequency,  intensity of spring frosts
    Cumulative grown)ng season warmth
    Frequency,  intensity, length of heat
     waves in midsummer
    Frequency,  intensity of fall frosts

  Precipitation variables

    Frequency,  length of flooding


    Frequency of spring soaking rains

    Growing season precipitation as  days
     below wilting point of soil moisture
    Frequency,  intensity of growin  season
      droughts
  Instense wind storms, ice storms
Saplings
Trees

Spring-terminating seeds
Trees

Saplings, trees
Soil biota

Seedlings
Fire frequency
Fall-germinaling seeds
Seedlings
Saplings, trees

Seedlings

Seedlings

Saplings, trees
Soil biota

Seedlings
Mature trees

Fire frequency

All trees,  largest
 trees,  shallow-rooted
 trees
X Death of  saplings
% Loss of buds, branches

X Death, by species
% Defoliation

X Growth of tree, by species
X Nutrient  release rates

X Death, by species
X Death, damage, reproduction by
    life-stage, and species

X Death, by species
X Death
X Death,  slowed growth,  by  species

X Death  from soil bioat,  by species

X Death  if  too little/too much
    by species
X Growth  of tree, by species
X Nutrient  release rates

X Death  by  species
X Slowed, stopped growth,
    by species
X Death,  damage;  reproduction by
    life-stage and species

X Death,  damage;  enhanced
    reproduction by species
  Loss of  reproduction,  tree damage

X Growth of tree, by species

X Increased disease, mortality
X Growth of tree, by species
  Loss and gain of pathogen
  population
X Increased disease; death by species
                                                                                                               X  Increased disease,  death by species
                                                                                                               X  Growth of trees,  by species
X Increased disease, death  by species;
  Loss and gain of pathogen population

X Increased disease, mortality
                                                                          10

-------
     Wissmar  and  Swanson  (1990)  suggest that  ecotones  may be
particularly sensitive to disturbance regime.  Ecotones are zones
of   transition  between   adjacent  ecological   systems   having
characteristics uniquely  defined by space and time scales and by
the strength of interactions between systems (Holland,  1988).  They
are considered to be sensitive to gradients of limiting factors and
landscape changes  caused  by physical and biological disturbances.
A  basic scientific  problem in  the evaluation  of  landscapes and
their ecotones is the lack of testable models with short- and long-
term  predictive capabilities  (Wissmar  and Swanson,  1990).   The
difficulty concerns not knowing the extent to  which characteristic
or repetitive changes in ecotones and ecosystems of a landscape are
caused  by  disturbances  of  low  frequency   and high magnitude
extremes.  We understand that large disturbance events  can dominate
the main trends of change.  Yet we do not know which events will be
formative, or  how  to recognize  temporal and spatial sequences of
events  and the ability of  ecotones and ecosystems  to recover to
characteristic  persistent  states.   Wissmar  and  Swanson  (1990)
present  information about representative disturbance  recurrences
and recovery phases for disturbed hillsides  and rivers,  but such
landscape knowledge for  both physical  and biotic  components of
ecotones and ecosystems is  generally lacking.

     White and Pickett (1985) summarize disturbance characteristics
which  can  be used  as  a guide to  the development  of  disturbance
climatologies.    Key descriptors  include spatial  distribution,
frequency, area and magnitude. These attributes are in  fundamental
agreement with descriptions contained in Reiners  (1983) and Bazzaz
(1983) .

     Spatial   distribution  includes  the  relationship   of  the
disturbance   to   geographic,   topographic,    environmental   and
ecological community gradients.  Table  1 suggests some guidelines
for the  geographic distribution of disturbance events.  The list
should be considered only an initial starting  point.  Summaries of
other  disturbance   studies  for  specific  geographic areas  or
applications include Peer (1990) and Solomon  et  al. (1984).

     Disturbance frequency is the mean  number of events per time
period.  Frequency is often  used  for probability of  disturbance
when  expressed  as  a  decimal  fraction  of  events  per  year.
Disturbance frequency is  of particular  interest  to climatologists
as well as ecologists.    Overpeck  et  al.  (1990)  report General
Circulation Model (GCM)  results that suggest changes in  disturbance
frequency resulting from  greenhouse warming.   The authors used  a
mixed-species,  mixed-age  stochastic stand-simulation model  to
estimate the impact on forest biomass of these changes. Given the
uncertainty in GCM scenario results, an  alternative  approach is to
explore ways in which changes in  forest health and productivity can
suggest  the  existence of  trends in disturbance event frequency.
Reiners (1983)  suggests measures of above, as well as below, ground
                                11

-------
biomass as an  indicator  of  changes in disturbance frequency.  He
suggests  that  as  disturbance  frequency  goes  up,  biomass and
associated detritus production will decrease.  This is reflected in
the model  generated results  of  Overpeck et al.  (1990) .   Bazzaz
(1983)  states  that frequency  of  disturbance  may regulate age
structure  of   the  population,   life   cycle   and  reproductive
strategies.

     Reiners  (1983)  also discusses the "kind"  or "uniqueness" of
the disturbance.    Species  composing  an ecosystem must  have, to
varying degrees,  adaptations  to normally occurring disturbances.
The more frequent the disturbance,  the stronger the representation
of  better adapted  species  and  theoretically,  the stronger the
selection  pressure for  adaptive  traits.   Thus  the impact  of  a
unique disturbance  is likely  to be more profound  than that of a
"normal" disturbance.  Similar distinctions are emphasized by White
and Pickett  (1985)  in their  review of the  terms  "disaster" and
"catastrophe."  A "disaster" occurs so frequently that it  is likely
to occur within the life cycles  of  successive generations, while a
"catastrophe"  occurs  rarely,  so  that  it is  unlikely  to  be
experienced  as a repeated selective force.  A  disaster  would be
likely to  increase  fitness through selection, while a catastrophe
would generally decrease fitness.  Figure 1  illustrates differences
between  developmental  pathways  of  frequently  and  infrequently
disturbed  riparian  forest  patches.   Pathway  1  includes  stand
initiation and exclusion stages during reactive and recovery phases
in  ecotones  following  disturbances.    Pathway  2  includes  stand
exclusion, understory reinitiation, and old growth stages  after the
recovery and during the  persistence phases.

     Size  of area disturbed can be expressed as  area  per event,
area per time period,  area per event per time period, or total area
per disturbance type(s) per  time period.  It is frequently given as
a percentage of total available area.  Disturbance size ranges from
very  small  gaps  created by  the  death  of  an  individual  in an
herbaceous community, to the breakage  of a tree limb to  the fall of
a single tree creating a canopy  gap, to the fall of several trees,
to very large disturbances created by fires and windstorms.  Bazzaz
(1983) states  that  disturbance size and heterogeneity interact in
determining size and identity  of plant populations.  Reiners  (1983)
states  that   areal extent   impacts  system  energetics  through
environmental modification and re-colonization potential.  A larger
disturbed  area  will,   within   limits,   create  more   extreme
microclimates for regenerative processes.  Depending on  the form of
ecosystem  disruption  generated  by  the  disturbance,   a  larger
catchment for runoff can result,  leading to a higher potential for
erosion on upland sites and  deposition in lowland sites.  A larger
disturbed  area,  particularly  as  it  takes  a  round  and   fully
contiguous   shape,   creates  a   longer  dispersal  distance  for
recolonizers,  including  both  the spores and  seeds  of  plants and
vectors such as specific and  critical pollinators.
                                12

-------
Figure  1.   Developmental pathways of  riparian  forest patches  in
              response  to  frequent  and infrequent disturbances.   The
              letter  't1 indicates  different transition times for
              riparian  patches  (successional stages)
              (Wissmar  and Swanson,  1990).
                  PATHWAY # 1
                  (Response to frequent
                  disturbances)
                                                    Vegetation remains In Initiation
                                                      and exclusion stages
                  PATHWAY # 2
                  (Responses to Infrequent
                  disturbances)
                                                       RECOVERY PHASE
Vegetation patches remain In
Initiation and exclusion stages
                                   REACTION PHASE
                                        \
    Vegetation patches develop via
    exelusion,understory reinitiation
    and old growth stages A
     PERSISTENCE PHASE
                                       13

-------
     Magnitude of disturbance can be characterized by intensity and
severity.    Scaling  intensity  is  relatively  simple  within  a
disturbance  type and  for a  particular ecosystem.   The  Palmer
Drought  Severity Index  for  drought  and  the  Fujita scale  for
tornadoes are examples of scaled disturbance intensities.  Reiners
(1983) points  out,  however,  that at present we have  no  means of
making comparisons  of  intensity  between disturbance  types,  or of
predicting responses of different ecosystems to the same intensity
of  a  particular  disturbance.   Intensity  responses  may  be non-
linear, not monotonic and threshold behavior,  particularly at the
ecosystem  level,  is  likely.   These  thresholds may  be  critical
points at which  recovery rates are  significantly slowed,  or more
importantly, at which recovery to the original state is impossible.
Defoliation either  by  pests or weather  events  is a  case in point
(Stephens, 1981; Johnson, et al., 1988).
I.E.2.  Conceptual Frameworks

     The importance of climate to the health, productivity and even
the existence  of  particular ecosystems has long  been recognized
(Woodward, 1987) .   But the field of ecology and,  along with it, the
study of  climate  and ecosystems,  has evolved rapidly  during the
last two decades.   Prior to  this, most ecological research focused
on  the  observational characterization  of ecological  patterns.
Research consisted primarily of qualitative descriptions with few
theories based on physical or mathematical principles.  In recent
years,  interdisciplinary  concepts  of  ecosystem  behavior  and
dynamics have  gained prominence.   Quantitative models  have been
developed for relationships  that had previously been expressed only
in qualitative terms.

     For  the  applied climatologist,  an  introduction  to  these
theoretical "frames of reference" serve two functions.  First, it
emphasizes the use of theory and mathematical techniques that are
also  found in  predictive  climate  and meteorological  research.
Markov chains and Chaos theory are two such examples.   Second, it
illustrates the limited role of climate  and  weather  in previous
ecological  research.   This  is as  much  the  responsibility  of
climatologists as  ecologists.  Ecologists performing climatological
analyses introduce  new  perspectives  concerning  climate/biosphere
interactions,  but to take advantage of  these contributions, the
applied climatologist must  gain an  appreciation  of  dynamic bio-
centric  as  well   as  more  familiar atmosphere  or  man-centered
systems.

     From  the  ecological side, the  selected frameworks  will be
familiar,  but the  role of climate in these settings is highlighted.
In  some cases,  climate  interactions  have  always been  present
implicitly, but rarely expressed explicitly.  For instance, under
the dynamic  stability framework,  the role  of energy  dynamics is

                                14

-------
discussed  at length,  but the  influence of  climate and  climate
disturbances on the storage or release of ecosystem energy is less
apparent.

     The  discussion  that  follows  highlights  three  conceptual
frameworks proposed in the recent  ecological literature.   These
approaches include dynamic stability,  Markov chain analysis  and
catastrophe theory.  The selected frameworks are presented both for
their range  of disciplinary  appeal, but also for their  similar
portrayal of climatological influences.


I.B.I.a.  Dynamic  Stability

     The first approach appears frequently in the literature of the
late 1970's and early 1980's.  It borrows prominently from physics,
specifically the field  of mechanics.  A representative  example is
illustrated  in Figure  2  adapted from  Godron and Forman  (1983).
Living organisms often start from highly stable states represented
as  state B  in  Figure 2.    Organisms   build  locally  metastable
ecosystems represented  by points C, D  or E.   At these  points,  a
system  will  return  to equilibrium  after small  (but not  large)
displacements.   The greater the  energy required to displace  the
system from equilibrium, the more metastable that system is said to
be.


Figure 2.  Mechanical dynamic stability  in terms of potential
           energy  (Godron and Forman, 1983).
                o
                tr
                UJ
                z
                UJ
                o
                Q.
  Most
Metastable
                                Least
                               Metostable
                         'Most Stable
                                15

-------
     Landscapes  represent  an interesting  special case  for this
framework.   As  defined earlier, a  landscape is made up of many
smaller patches.  Borman and  Likens (1979)  develop an example of
this framework applied to forest clear-cuts.  The authors example
begins at a highly metastable  point  located  to the  left of point A
of  Figure 2.   This  point represent  a  system with  high biomass
(potential energy).   Energy, in the form of some disturbance event,
clear-cutting in  the Borman  and Likens example  although fire or
hurricane would work in a similar fashion,  is input to the system
(point A)  and the biomass  is released until point B is reached.
Disturbance  and increased decomposition promote  an  increase in
available  water and  nutrients.   As time passes,  living biomass
again  accumulates and the  system  progresses through metastable
points C,  D and E.   Based on output of the forest  growth model
JABOWA (Botkin,  et al.,  1972),  Borman and  Likens (1979) suggest
that  dynamic equilibrium,  or  shifting  mosaic  steady  state is
achieved  when  the total  biomass  across  all  patches begins to
oscillate about a mean.  When a dynamic equilibrium is reached, the
proportions of  landscape patches in states B, C,  D or E remain more
or  less constant  with  time, but the state  of any individual plot
may change  as it gains or looses biomass (points  L,  M,  N or Z) .
For example, new patches  in state B  arise when gaps are created by
the fall of large trees.  This results in a  "blip"  in the level of
biomass which is later compensated for by biomass gains (increased
metastability)  in other patches.

     Under  a dynamic  equilibrium   framework,  climate plays  two
roles.  First,  climate means and long-term patterns of variability
impose upper limits to the accumulation of potential energy in the
ecosystem.  Second, climate can act to move systems  from metastable
states to higher or lower states.   For example,  metastability can
be increased by directly supplying or facilitating the storage of
additional energy (e.g. Photosynthetically Active Radiation  (PAR),
moisture,    conditions   favorable    for    nutrient   fixation).
Metastability could be decreased by bringing about the release of
stored energy through, the addition of mechanical energy  (wind,
hurricane), heat energy (lightening  and  fire) or direct removal of
potential energy  (e.g., reduced available moisture resulting  from
drought), thus triggering decomposition and the loss of potential
energy from the  system.   The  importance  of  this  framework to
ecosystem  status and  health monitoring  is  that these climate
related energy  exchanges  take place  continually  and  are part of
normal ecosystem behavior.    Changes  in  these  relationships or
patterns  of  climate  related  energy accumulation  and release may
indicate changing forest status, health or define the  initiation of
forest or climate trends.   More detailed discussions of  ecosystem
energetics including  climatological aspects are provided in Reiners
(1983) and several papers in Zonneveld and Forman  (1990).
                                16

-------
I.B.2.b.  Recurrence and Persistence

     This conceptual framework is closely related to principles of
Markov processes.   The  Markov chain is a special  case in which a
finite  (or  countably infinite) number of  outcomes  or states are
possible.  A  first  order Markov chain is one in which each state
depends only  on the immediately preceding state.

     Models   using  Markov  techniques  are  useful  as  a  first
approximation to changes from one ecological  state to another when
only  the  probabilities  of  the  transitions   can  be  estimated
(Jeffers,  1988).    Within  major  states,  substates  can  also  be
modelled as a Markov chain.  Markov models (and related approaches)
have been used successfully  as  landscape modeling paradigms in both
applied and basic contexts.  Markov models of  forest succession are
mathematically and  conceptually the most straight  forward of the
succession models that are presently in use (Shugart et al. , 1988).
This approach is also found in more complex "gap" models.  Several
examples  of the  use of Markov process models for  successional
modeling are  mentioned  in Weinstein and Shugart (1983).

     Early stand dynamics models held climate constant using only
average  conditions.   Climate  impacted  forest composition  only
through growth response to  temperature and competition for light
and moisture.  Movement through the successional chain was driven
by forest-gap initiation  and overturn through old-age mortality -
Later   research   recognized   that  changes   in  disturbance  or
climatological regime  short-circuits these  slower  processes and
modifies the  rate of successional change.  Overpeck et al. (1990)
tested the sensitivity of a widely used stochastic stand-simulation
model (FORENA, Shugart,  1984) to changes  in disturbance frequency.
The practical impact of climate disturbance  in these simulations
was to reset the Markov  chain to earlier successional stages.  More
frequent  disturbance  resulted  in  greater  dominance  by  early
successional  species.

     As  yet,  Markov  chains have  not  been  employed  to simulate
temporal patterns  of large scale  disturbance,  but  research that
explores  the use   of  Markov  chains  to  predict  large-scale
atmospheric   patterns    is   underway   (S.   LeDuc,   personal
communication).  The need to relate such large-scale circulations
to models of forest  ecosystem dynamics is discussed in Michaels and
Hayden  (1987).

     Botkin  (1980)  uses the concept of  Markov  chains to address
some highly general  ecological  concepts. He suggests that ecosystem
behavior   through  time   can  usually   be   described   by  two
characteristics. First,  particular ecosystem  states come and go, or
recur. Second, the  recurrence of ecosystem states depends on the
total amount  of  variation  (the total  number of possible states)
which,  in  turn,  must be  bounded.  This  suggests the  concepts of
ecosystem persistence within bounds and the recurrence of  specific

                                17

-------
ecosystem states.

     Under this  framework,  long-term patterns  of climatological
means  and  variability   can   influence  the  establishment  and
persistence  of  dominant ecological  landscapes,  i.e.,  climate
features  set  the bounds  for the  state space  (Woodward,  1987).
Conversely, climate is dynamic,  with  weather conditions that can
vary widely from one  year to the next.   Climate can, therefore,
affect the range of  variation  (the number of possible  states), the
rate of recurrence of particular states and the average time that
the ecosystem is in any of its possible states.


I.B.2.C.  Theories of Catastrophe and Chaos

     Catastrophe  theory  has   recently  attracted  considerable
attention in studies of non-linear mathematical dynamics and chaos
theory-  Chaos theory  has shown  that regular equations can produce
irregular behavior.  Minor variations in the system's initial state
cause  behavior  that  is, in  effect,  unpredictable   even  though
overall system change is predictable.   It is strictly determinate
in  a  mathematical  sense.    Catastrophe theory  suggests that  a
gradually changing  system (with its  associated  characteristics)
converges on  and crosses  particular  points (chaotic  attractors).
Only a  slight change  in the  immediate  vicinity of a point will
divert the  system in  a  quite  different direction.   A  change in
system  non-linearity  acts  in  a  fashion  similar  to changes  in
initial  system  state.    Not  only  might  the final  equilibrium
condition be altered,  but the  ability  of the system to converge to
equilibrium may  be  eliminated  (Gleick,  1987) .   One example which
could lead  to a system  of  equations that contain changing non-
linearities is plant growth and development under variable moisture
stress.
     Forman and  Godron  (1986)  propose  that  major alterations in
landscape development  take place in this way.  An abrupt change in
the distribution of  climatological events is one factor that, alone
or in combination with other factors,  can push an ecosystem beyond
its critical  threshold  point.   For  instance, tree  species that
normally tolerate degraded air quality conditions may  experience a
precipitous decline when frequency and intensity of severe winter
conditions change.  The  determination of  the  short  or  long term
nature of such interactions would influence the interpretation of
present status and  monitored  trends  in  forest health (Johnson et
al., 1988) .
                                18

-------
I.B.2.d  Temporal and Spatial Hierarchies

     To fully understand the role of climate  (changing climate) in
an ecological  context,  its  place in  a bio-centric  temporal and
spatial  hierarchy must  be considered.   In  the  context  of the
present   study,   compatibility   of   spatial  scale   is  fairly
straightforward,  but  temporal  scale must   be  approached  more
cautiously.  Although the disturbance event  (e.g., windthrow) may
take place in the space  of a few minutes,  it is the response of the
biological system to this  disturbance that  is of  interest.   For
example,  even  though a tree  is  partially uprooted, it  may take
several seasons to die.  Changes in crown  density and nutrients may
respond on the order of weeks to months to prolonged drought, but
normal growth and reproduction may not be  observed for one or more
growing seasons even with a return to more moderate temperature and
moisture regimes.   This represents a  radical departure from more
traditional  mono-crop  agriculture applications  common in  the
climate literature that most often deal with single or short-term
events  occurring within a  particular growing season.    With the
exception of extremely rapid-growing species such as loblolly pine,
forest/climate  impacts  span periods  from one to ten years and
frequently include multiple, interacting disturbance events.

     Figure 3 relates time and space distributions of disturbance
regimes, forest processes, environmental constraints and vegetation
patterns.  In the case  of disturbance regime, spatial scales fall
neatly into the mesoscale and synoptic scale definitions provided
in Huschke (1989).  The  temporal scale  represents the return period
of the  disturbance  event.   As  an example, one  interpretation of
Figure 3 is that a windthrow event with a return period  of 1 in 100
to 1 in 1000  years and impacting an area on the order of 1000 m2 can
be expected to affect tree replacement  processes within topographic
constraints  and may  manifest  itself   in  changes  in gap  (canopy
disruption) and stand or serai stage vegetation pattern.

     Climate change  events,  typified in Figure 3 by glacial cycles,
is defined as spanning more than 10000 years and impacting more and
10000 km2.   From Figure 3,   affected processes  include species
extinction and  impacts  would be  noted in vegetation patterns of
ecological provinces  and biomes.   If, as some  studies  suggest,
climate change takes place  on smaller  spatial scales  (i.e., 105 m2)
and  over  a   shorter  time  (i.e.,  102  years), new impacts and
constraints  can be  quickly  noted.   For  instance,  under glacial
change, the  importance  of  disturbance regime all but disappears.
Disturbance reemerges as an important element under a scenario of
rapid  environmental change.   Secondary  succession and species
migration processes  emerge  as  new impact areas.   Soil properties
(pedogenesis) and fluxes of moisture  and energy  become limiting
constraints.    Changes  in   stand and  cover  patterns  may  become
evident.
                                19

-------
Figure  3.    (a)  Disturbance  regimes,  (b)  forest  processes,  (c)
environmental constraints  and (d)  vegetation patterns, viewed  in
the context of space-time domains  (Gosselink, et al.,  1990).
                             a -
                 SPATIAL SCALE (lofl m'l
                             C J
           UICRO-
           CNVMONS7
                                                     b -
                                                   10  13
                     CO.,.1)
                                            SCALE (lo« m1)
I.e.  Summary - A Working Hypothesis of Climate/Ecosystem
                Interactions

     The  relationship of climate  (the synthesis  of  weather) to
ecosystems depends  on the time and space scale of the biological
system  to  be  monitored  and  the  analyses  to  be  performed.
Climatological  averages  and ranges  reflect one  set  of physical
bounds  on the  number of possible ecosystem  states  represented
within  a  landscape.   Inter-annual  climate variability  acts as
ecosystem disturbances.   Disturbance  phenomena  impact ecosystem
health and productivity  as  measured by changes in growth,  system
energetics,   plant   populations   and   species  characteristics.
Disturbance  events  impact  the  persistence  and  recurrence of
ecological  states.     Disturbance  events  vary  with  geographic
location  and  can  be described  by  their  frequency,   size  and
magnitude.  Many EMAP and FHM indicators,  particularly those based
on  directly   monitored  observations,   may  not  be  correctly
interpreted and valid  associations drawn  without consideration of
mitigating or compounding Climatological factors.  A climatological
description of  background persistence  and disturbance regimes is
essential  if  associative   (EMAP)  or  predictive  (FHM)  modeling
                                20

-------
studies are to include natural as well as anthropogenic forces of
ecosystem change.

     The remainder of this  report  applies  this hypothesis to the
New England region of the U.S.   Data availability,  analysis  and
display options are discussed in section  II.  Climate analyses are
performed  to  address  three  levels  of  inquiry:    large-scale
climatologies  that  establish  system boundaries  (e.g.  means and
extremes);  climatologies  of  shorter duration and  smaller scale
disturbances  that  are  characterized  by  frequency,  size  and
magnitude; and climate summaries that permit comparisons of recent
regional  and  local  conditions to   pre-determined  baseline  or
historical conditions.
II.  Data and Methodology

II.A.  Targeting the Study

     The vast array of possible climate/ecosystem interactions that
could  be  examined is  substantially narrowed by "targeting"  the
analysis to a particular setting.  In this case,  the cooperative US
EPA/EMAP-Forests pilot and USDA Forest Service New England Forest
Health Monitoring  (NEFHM) project has been selected.

     EMAP is a long-range program to monitor status and trends in
the  condition  of the major  ecological  resources of the  U.S.   A
discussion of  the  sampling  design and landscape characterization
under EMAP is presented in Norton  and Slonecker  (1990) .  Six broad
ecological categories have been defined within EMAP, one of which
is Forests.   The  use of indicators to measure  ecological status and
trends for  forests as well  as the other  resource  categories is
discussed  in Hunsaker  and   Carpenter  (1990).    An  indicator is
defined  to  be  a  characteristic  of  the  environment that,  when
measured, quantifies  habitat  characteristics,   the  magnitude of
stress, degree of exposure to the stressor,  or degree  of ecological
response to  the exposure.   Under this definition,  for example,
drought is a climate  stressor,  but Palmer  Drought Severity Index
quantifies the magnitude  of  stress and  so  is a  stress indicator.
Climate as a whole  could also be considered a landscape indicator.
A  landscape indicator  is  defined  as  a  characteristic  of  the
environment  used to describe  spatial distribution  of  physical,
biological  and  cultural  features  across  a   geographic  area.
Although all examples  of stress and stressors given in Hunsaker and
Carpenter  (1990)   are  negative,  a stress  does  not necessarily
correspond to a decline in forest status or health.  The authors'
definition of stress indicator suggests only "changes in exposure
and  habitat."    This  conincides  with literature  definitions of
ecological stress which closely resemble our  earlier  definition of
disturbance  (Barrett,  1981).   Throughout  the  remainder  of  this

                                21

-------
report, disturbance and stress will be used interchangeably with no
value judgment as  to the  detrimental  or beneficial nature of the
resultant ecosystem response.

     The U.S.D.A. Forest  Service (USDA-FS)  has designed a national
system to annually monitor the health of the Nation's forests as an
integral part of the USDA-FS Global Change Program proposed under
the Forest  Ecosystems  and Atmospheric Pollution  Research  Act of
1988.    The  program involves coordination  with  the USEPA's EMAP.
This new program,  Forest Health Monitoring (FHM)  is a multi-tiered,
long-term   process  to   1)   detect   unexpected  deviation  from
established baseline conditions or trends,  2)  identify causes of
change, and 3) define basic relationships sufficiently to predict
consequences. Detection,  evaluation and research monitoring levels
are planned.  Implementation of the  FHM program began during the
summer of 1990 in New England (NEFHM).

     The initial year of the cooperative NEFHM/EMAP-forest project
consisted of 263 nearly equally spaced sampling areas, each being
equivalent  to an  EMAP  sampling  hexagon.   EMAP plots  are 40.6 km2
hexagons with a  density of  a one-sixteenth sample of total area.
These  points represent   potentially  forested  locations.    Some
hexagons fell in urbanized areas so that the final  sampling network
consisted   of   206  forested  hexagons   distributed  throughout
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and
Vermont  (Figure  4).  As time goes  on, present forested sites may
become  urbanized  or  previously  inaccessible  sites may  become
available.  Although 206  locations were sampled during 1990,  all
263 sites remain available for future sampling seasons.  Specific
NEFHM objectives are provided in Table 5.  Lists of the variables
selected for observation  are provided in USDA Forest Service (no
date). The initial sampling project was completed during the summer
months of 1990.   A summary of this collection season is provided in
Brooks et al. (a)  (in press).
                                22

-------
Pigur
e 4-  The
                                             Program
                                                          network
                                    O 0 O O  O
                                   O O O O O  (
                                  O O O O O O
                                 O O O O O O <
                                0  P O • 0 O
                                 O O O 0 0 O t
                             oooooooco
                            000000300
                           oooooooooo
                           > o  o  o    o o o o o o
                           O O  O  O  0 O
                         23

-------
Table 5.  USDA  Forest  Service  New  England  Forest  Health  and
          Monitoring Program objectives  (USDA, no date).
       To  characterize the  following  forest conditions:
            a.  growth rates
            b.  tree  vigor
            c.  soil/site
            d.  stand composition
            e.  landscape

       To  characterize the  following  potential forest stressors:

            a.  insect and disease pests
            b.  climate  (long-term)/weather  (short-term)
            c.  atmospheric  pollution/deposition
            d.  other (direct anthropogenic activities, e.g
            harvesting)

       To  quantify changes  in forest  conditions, and

       To  correlate  changes in forest condition with potential
       forest stresses.
II.B.  Data Resources

     Section  I  has suggested  general frameworks  for describing
climate features relevant to the analysis of forest landscapes and
patch  dynamics.   The  importance of  climate  related disturbance
regime to  these frameworks  is  clear.  For  example, disturbance
related  mortality  impacts  tree population  structure,  community
structure, the release of light, nutrient and moisture resources,
resources stored by decomposers and the creation of new resources
such as complex organic compounds and  decomposer habitat (Franklin
et al., 1987). Climate and forest scientists  agree that changes in
disturbance regime can result in major ecosystem impacts and could
be an early indicator of greenhouse warming (Overpeck  et al., 1990;
Michaels and  Hayden,  1987;  Graham  et al., 1990).  To be  able to
more fully understand forest/disturbance interactions and to detect
changes in these relationships, data must be assembled and baseline
climatologies constructed.

     Data  sets bearing on several major  categories  of ecosystem
disturbance have been  assembled.  Methodologies  are explored to
illustrate the relevance  of specific climate  features  to forest
status and health assessment.   The pertinent climatological data
sets are outlined below.  Examples of their use in  selected climate
analysis products will be presented in section III.


                                24

-------
II.B.I.  Severe Weather  (High Winds and Tornadoes)

     Windthrow, the toppling or uprooting of trees by wind, can be
a  frequent disturbance  phenomenon in  northern and New England
forests.   Catastrophic  windthrow  in presettlement Wisconsin is
discussed  in  Canham and Loucks  (1984).   They  conclude  that the
majority of windthrow damage conforms to downburst phenomena such
as those described in Fujita  (1978).   Bormann  and  Likens (1979)
take a larger spatial view and conclude that the importance of
such events varies with geographic location, but windthrow  is a
frequent disturbance throughout the Northern Hardwood Forest area
of North America.   Ferris  (1980)  reports that windstorms are not
uncommon in Maine and mature  spruce-fir  stands are particularly
susceptible to windthrow because  they have shallow root systems.
Henry  and  Swan  (1974)  summarize  an  analysis  of the  affects of
windthrow on an experimental forest in southwestern New Hampshire.

     Tornado and  damaging wind data bases were obtained from the
National Weather  Service's  (NWS)  National Severe Storms Forecast
Center  (NSSFC) in Kansas City,  Missouri.   They contain digitized
records from 1950  (for tornadoes)  or  1955  (for wind) through 1989
and have been updated for the New  England  states through September
of 1990 using preliminary weather  service  reports. Similar records
have been acquired from Environment Canada, Atmospheric Environment
Service to supplement data-sparse portions of northern New England.

     Michaels and Hayden (1987) suggest that frequency,  strength
and area affected are important characteristics of severe storms
for the  estimation of atmospheric  effects  on  ecosystems.   These
correspond  with   disturbance   frequency,   magnitude   and  size
characteristics recommended by Pickett and White (1985).  A number
of descriptors are available from the NSSFC database;  only a few
are selected for analysis.   In  the case  of tornadoes these include
location of  touchdown,   direction,  length and width of  path and
strength as  described by the  Fujita scale  given below (Fujita,
1981).
          Funita  Tornado         Classification categories
          F-scale             maximum estimated wind velocity
                                          (m/s)
            F-0                         18 - 32
            F-l                         33 - 50
            F-2                         51 - 70
            F-3                         71 - 92
            F-4                         93 - 116
            F-5                        117 - 142

     Although these  may  be  critical characteristics,  time-series
taken from the  best digitized weather  records  available must be
used with care. Reporting and verification criteria vary throughout
the  record.    The  tendency of reported  events  to converge on
population centers is also easily noted in a 30-year summary map of
severe weather events (Figure 5).

                                25

-------
Figure 5.  Digitized  location  of severe weather events,  1961-1990
A  WIND  EVENT
       o ter t
       knots)
                                                (jjrep ter than
                                                TORNADO EVENT
                                                Spot location

                                                (Tornodo  trockj
                                                 ore indicated
                                                 •i th a line)
                                    26

-------
     Because  of  these  limitations,    time  series  of  tornado
characteristics are not presented in any of the climate summaries.
Particularly when detection  of  trends  and changes in disturbance
regimes are  priorities,  observational biases in  this historical
database are too great. Analyses of other characteristics such as
tornado strength  (magnitude) and  area affected  (size)  may also
suffer from similar biases, but, if it is assumed that the storms
randomly hit populated areas, a  pooled  sample of these population-
centered storms should  still provide  reasonably reliable general
information concerning the characteristics  of tornadic events in
New England.  Aggregate  summaries of  monthly distribution(intra-
annual frequency),  F-scale  (intensity)   and extent  of  affected
surface area (size)  are presented in the climate summaries (section
III) .

     Reporting errors aside,  other problems arise when attempting
to  relate  point observations of  storm damage to  an operational
monitoring program  such as  EMAP  or FHM.   Figure  5  displays the
location of reported  severe  weather events.   Figure 6, generated
with a GIS,  represents  the intersection  (co-location of latitude
and longitude coordinates)  of New  England tornado  events  of the
most  recent decade and  the NEFHM sampling hexagons.    First,
population bias is again evident.   Second, the impression from the
sampling  network alone  is  that  tornadic  events  are  far  less
frequent  than  the  weather  database  suggests.    That  is,  the
likelihood  of  noting  the effects  of  these events  at  a  forest
sampling point  is quite small.   This  latter point  is  even more
evident in Figure 7.   Figure 7  is a representation of a specific
hexagon in southwestern New Hampshire in which tornado events were
reported.   The  dashed lines  surrounding the tornado locations
represent imprecision in the  coordinate locations of the digitized
weather  record.    The large open  circle represents  the  forest
sampling location within the hexagon.

     The implications  of these comparisons are twofold.   First,
tornadoes and other severe storm events may best be summarized in
an  aggregate,  landscape,  manner.   Knowledge  of  the individual
events will  be  essential to future forest  model  development and
interpretation of site specific  health  indicators  (e.g., mortality
and  crown  condition) ,  but  will   likely  not be  useful for the
detection  of overall  resource  condition and  trends.   Second,
remotely sensed  data  from Doppler radar  and  space  based  earth
observing systems should play a vital role in establishing accurate
regional summaries.   For example,  by the turn of the century  it is
anticipated that  instruments on the Earth  Observing System will
provide global coverage; surface winds  are expected to be measured
at  100 km  resolution with errors  less than  5  ms"1 (Baker,  1991) .
Although this still represents  a  fairly  high degree of error as
compared to in situ instrumentation, it will fill large geographic
"gaps" in our present databases.
                                27

-------
Figure 6.  Intersections of digitized severe weather  events  with
           NEFHM Program sampling hexagons, 1961-1990.
                                     00*0
                                 o  o  o o o  o
                                   o  o o o  o  
                                 o  o  o o o  o
                                o  o  •  o o
                               o o  o  o o o  o
                             OOOOOOOO
                            oooooooo
                           oooo»ooooo
            • o o  *  o / •
                           oo »ooo/o oo
                            o  o o o  o
            o o o  •
           •  o •  • > o o o
            o o o /*  o o
            o o I o  o o •  *
             k  O  • •
         « •  k  O  • IO
                     ">T - __^/-«
                    -7    ^ V*
                               28

-------
Figure 7.  Location of tornado touchdown and path within a forest
           sampling hexagon in southwestern New Hampshire, 1981-
           1990.
                                          hexagon area = 40 km
                                       hexagon diameter =  8 km
                                                  •    wind  event
                                                 —   tornado  track
                                                  o    FHU  samp It  site
                                                 Direction  and  d i stance
                                                  to  nearest  coop  site
                                                           2
                                29

-------
     Wind reports contained in the NSSFC database are events that
meet certain criteria.  There must be verified peak gusts  in excess
of 26 ms"1 (50 knots) for inclusion in the database.   On  occasion,
no windspeed  measurements  are available and  gusts  are  estimated
from damage  surveys.   In  these  cases it can  be determined that
windspeeds in excess of 26  ms"1 occurred, but the exact value of the
peak cannot be established.

     Because  of  reporting  uncertainties similar  to  those of the
tornado database, no time  series summaries  have been prepared. A
seasonal frequency distribution (intra-annual  frequency)  of events
is  presented for  wind.  The  data do  not  support  a  wind  speed
magnitude analysis.  Area  impacted (disturbance size) information
are not available in digitized form.

     Additional  events of  interest  are reported in  the serial
publication,  Storm data   (USDOC,  1991).    The  digitized severe
weather data that has been analyzed here is abstracted from these
publications.  Storm Data may be of limited "real time" help to the
FHM program since its publication schedule runs six or more months
behind the event.  However, it  is useful for information  about the
previous season.  For instance, data  are available in October 1990
for storms which occurred  in February 1990.
II.B.2.  Tropical Cyclones

     The passage of  tropical  cyclones  or hurricanes represents a
synoptic  scale,  ecosystem  level  disturbance.    Severe  storm
(mesoscale)  events  such as  high winds,  hail and  tornadoes  may
accompany or be imbedded in these systems, but overall, impacts are
more widespread. The terms tropical depression,  tropical storm, or
hurricane are assigned depending on whether the sustained surface
winds near the center of the system are, respectively,  <  17 ms'1, 17
ms'1 to 32 ms"1 inclusive, or >  32  ms"1.   Tropical cyclones are not
archived  (or named)  unless  they reach  at  least  tropical  storm
strength.   The maximum wind  speed often must be  inferred from
indirect evidence,  and  a wind speed is  subjectively assigned  by the
analyst after considering all available information.

     The  passage  through  the  New  England area  of disturbances
associated with or derived  from  North Atlantic tropical cyclones
is not uncommon.  Most often, the original tropical system has been
highly modified by contact with continental air masses  and is rated
as extratropical  by the  time New  England  is  reached.    When a
tropical cyclone becomes extratropical, the size of the circulation
usually expands, the speed of the maximum wind decreases, and the
distribution of the  winds,  rainfall,  and temperatures around the
center of the cyclone become increasingly asymmetric.  While these
characteristic features develop,  some  tropical features, such as a


                                30

-------
small area of strong, often hurricane-force winds near the center
and extremely heavy  rainfall,  may be retained for a considerable
time.

     A 1938 New England cyclone is a good  example  of a storm which
was  technically  classified  as  extratropical,   but which  still
maintained hurricane-like characteristics  (Neumann,  et al., 1990).
Figure 8 shows the track of this system, labeled as storm number 4
for that year,  as it passed through the  region.   Henry and Swan
(1974) summarize the ecological impacts of damage associated with
this storm while  still  rated  at hurricane strength at a research
forest site in southwestern New Hampshire  (Figure  9).   Historical
reconstruction at  this  site  indicates  the forest canopy remained
essentially intact between 1665  and 1897.  After this date, four
windstorms, culminating in the 1938 hurricane,  completely destroyed
the canopy trees and  set in motion the growth of  a  new forest.  The
authors compare forest  characteristics prior  to the 1897 to 1938
disturbance period (pre-hurricane) to those of the  period 1938-1967
(post-hurricane).  They conclude that the  post-hurricane forest
exhibits higher tree density,  smaller  stem diameters and changed
species composition.  Although the pre-hurricane and post-hurricane
forests  have  beech   (Fagus   grandifolia),  white birch  (Betula
papyrifera Marsh.) and hemlock (Tsuga canadensis)  in common, their
composition differs  in  that  the current  forest  also contains red
maple (Acer rubrum L.),  black birch (Betula  lenta  L.), sugar maple
(Acer saccharum Marsh.)  and striped maple  (Acer pensylvanicum L.).
White pine  (Pinus strobus L.), present before  the hurricane,  is
absent in the post-hurricane forest.

     Neumann  et  al.(1990) compile  map displays  (referred  to  as
"best  tracks")  of  annual and multi-year  tropical  storm  track
summaries in the North Atlantic.   They  represent best estimates of
the smoothed path of  the cyclone eye as it  moves  across the earth's
surface.  These tracks should be considered  as the average path of
the larger scale storm  circulation system and not necessarily the
precise location of the  eye at any given time.

    Since  the  introduction   of  continuous  weather  satellite
surveillance,, there  is  little chance that a tropical cyclone will
go undetected.  There also is a high probability  that the  center of
the storm can be  located within 46 km of  its actual position and
the intensity determined to within 5.1 ms'1  of its actual intensity.
Since all of the storm tracks and intensity classifications for the
1964 through 1989  Atlantic hurricane seasons were prepared with the
benefit of  satellite imagery  (as well as aircraft reconnaissance
and  other  data),  the  track  accuracy should  be  near   optimum,
considering the scale of the maps and the scale of  motion depicted.
                                31

-------
Figure 8.  North Atlantic cyclone tracks for 1938 (Neumann et al., 1990).
                        U.S.  DEPARTMENT   OF  COMMERCE, WEATHER  BUREAU
                         NORTH  ATLANTIC   HURRICANE  TRACKING  CHART

-------
Figure 9.  The influence of weather-related  disturbance events on
           a mixed coniferous and broadleaf deciduous forest in New
           Hampshire  (after Woodward,  1987).

x Main
•torey

t
tnereaaina
Dominance

1OO -]
80 -

60 -
40 •
2O

O -
                                Development of
                                main canopy
               Pinua




               Tsuga

               Picea

              Quercua

               Acer
              Pop,,In.
                                         Pinua —
T»ug
              Tauga
              (Date)  16BO  17OO 174-O 178O 182O  1B6O
                     I
                    Fire
     There  is some suggestion that there  has  been an increase in
U.S. east  coast storminess since the early  1940's and a shift in
dominant storm track to a position further off the coast (Hayden,
1981).  Hayden concludes that these trends  are part of a secular
variation  of a longer time scale.  Future trends in tropical and
extratropical storms and storm tracks under greenhouse warming is
a hotly debated topic.   While some scientists argue for increases
in the destructive potential of hurricanes  (Emanuel,  1987; Emanuel,
1988)  and  a higher frequency of hurricanes  (AMS Council and UCAR
Board  of Trustees, 1988) under greenhouse warming, others maintain
there  will  be  no  change  in  the  frequency of  occurrence  of
Atlantic/Caribbean hurricanes  and  a  significant  decrease  in the
intensities of such  storms (Idso,  et al, 1990).

     For this report, North Atlantic cyclone events during the most
recent 30  years are enumerated. Magnitude is summarized by life-
stage  at  landfall and during its passage  through the New England
region.  Size is broadly summarized by listing the  states through
which  the  storm path passed.   Each storm is somewhat unique and
should be  individually  researched  if  site  specific  detail  is
required.
                                 33

-------
II.B.3.  Drought

     Next we move from disturbances resulting in direct windthrow
damage and mortality to a disturbance with more subtle implications
for  forest ecosystem health.   Drought  impacts many  aspects of
forest health.   As a drought develops,  leaf  cells progressively
dehydrate  and the  reduced turgor  of leaf  cells  inhibits cell
expansion  (Kozlowski, 1985).  At the same time the stomata close,
thereby reducing the rate of photosynthesis by impeding absorption
of  C02 through  stomatal  pores.     Changes  in  hormonal  growth
regulators  also  occur.    If  drought  is  prolonged, the  reduced
transport  of  carbohydrates and  hormonal growth  regulators from
leaves  to  roots  will  reduce root  growth which will  decrease
absorption  of water and  mineral nutrients.  Production of fruits
and seeds can be arrested by drought at any stage of reproductive
growth,  including  flower bud  initiation,  opening of  flowers,
pollination,  fertilization,  embryo  growth,  or  fruit and  seed
enlargement.  Trees in chronic drought  areas typically allocate an
abnormally  large  carbon  component to  their roots  (Smith,  1990).
Field observations of prolonged droughts in the Allegheny Plateau
region of  northwestern Pennsylvania  result  in  heavy mortality of
shallow-rooted tree species such as hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) and
yellow birch  (Betula alleghaniensis)  (Runkle,  1985).  Drought has
been implicated as  an  initiator or  important  contributor  to many
forest declines (Smith, 1990).

     A  secondary  impact  of  drought  is  pest  infestation.   For
instance,  spruce  budworm outbreaks  occur  in  Maine in  stands of
overmature  balsam  fir under  warm,  dry  May  and  June  conditions
(Ferris, 1980).  Trees begin  to die  after  5 years of defoliation
and  mortality is  nearly complete after  8 years.   Trees under
drought stress may also have lower resistance to pests such  as bark
beetles (e.g., reduced resin exudation)(Graham, et al,  1990).  In
pine-oak  forests  of  the  southeastern  United  States,  drought
predisposes most of the  resident  pines to  successful invasion by
the southern pine beetle  (Michaels et al.,  1986)

     One measured forest  response to drought  is tree ring width.
A summary of current tree ring analysis techniques is provided in
Fritts and  Swetnam  (1989).  The authors  also  provide examples of
dendrochronological  applications  to  the  assessment  of  spruce
budworm  effects  on  forest growth,  forest decline and  climate
variability and  change.    Puckett (1981)  reconstructs  a  drought
climatology using  tree  rings  and Zahner and Myers (1989)  use an
index of drought  severity to  help identify sources  of stress as
reflected in tree ring histories.

     One prominent indicator  of  meteorological  drought  is the
Palmer Drought  Severity Index (PDSI)  (Palmer,  1965).    The PDSI
represents  the  deviation of  meteorological  conditions  from
climatological  "normals"  for  some  specified  area  or location.


                               34

-------
Although the  temporal characteristics of the  algorithm makes it
poorly suited  for  estimating the impact of  short-term drought on
biological systems  (Sadowski, 1975; Cooter,1982; Alley, 1984), it
appears  to  be  a  reasonable  measure  of longer  duration  drought
stress for  forest  ecosystems (e.g. Puckett, 1981  and Zahner and
Myers, 1989) .  The PDSI response time is of the same  order as forest
growth  and  development,  and   its  use  to  define  large-scale
climatological patterns  is well  established (Karl, 1983;  Eder et
al., 1987).

     The PDSI uses  mean monthly temperature  and precipitation data
and  a  hydrologic  accounting system based  upon simple soil and
atmospheric demand  models. Moisture  is  removed linearly from the
top  layer of  the two-layer  soil  model.  Moisture removal from the
underlying  layer is proportional to how close  the profile  is to
moisture capacity.   Potential atmospheric moisture demand is a non-
linear  transformation of  mean  monthly  temperature  and  monthly
precipitation.  Actual demand is a function of the potential and
the  moisture   available  to  meet the demand.    Once  atmospheric
demands are met, the remaining precipitation is assumed to refill
the  soil  profile  linearly  from  the   top layer,   down.    Any
precipitation  in excess  of that  needed to refill the  soil profile
and  meet atmospheric  demand (evapotranspiration)   is treated as
runoff.

     Palmer (1965)  documents the  original development  of the PDSI.
Monthly  PDSI   for  climate divisions  across the  U.S.  from  1895
through 1990 have  been digitized and are distributed through the
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Climate Divisions (CDs) are
groups of political (e.g. counties)  or geographic (e.g. hydrologic
basins)  entities  considered  to  be climatologically  homogeneous.
Documentation  for these  data  is  available in Karl  et  al. (1983).

     In this study, drought  frequency is represented  in two ways.
First,  time series  of  area-weighted PDSI  values  are computed.
Growing season (April-September)  means are provided for a baseline
summary  and  individual months  are  provided  for shorter  term
summaries.  Statistics of PDSI must be examined with  care because
of the  influence of the method  of  calculation.   For instance, a
baseline  summary  of   "mean  PDSI"  would be  meaningless  if the
baseline was  equivalent to  the normalizing  period  of the  time
series.  By definition,  the mean PDSI  for  this period should be
zero.   Likewise,  the frequency distribution  of  PDSI  values is
predefined by the characteristics of the normalizing  period.

     Drought disturbance magnitude has  two  components, intensity
and duration.   Frequency, intensity and  duration are summarized in
the  baseline  climate  summary using a return period presentation.
The  return  period  is the amount of time expected  to pass before
these  or more extreme  conditions  are  experienced.   Figure  3
suggests that  a 100  year  return period would  be  an appropriate
definition of drought disturbance.  The entire computed PDSI record

                                35

-------
is used in the baseline summary.  Frequency and intensity summaries
are based  on mean growing season  (April  through September)  PDSI
values.   This  eliminates higher frequency events  that might not
appear in growth indicator measures such as changes in diameter at
breast height  (dbh)  and  tree  ring  widths.  Individual months are
examined to determine drought  persistence.  A PDSI value of -3.0 or
more negative indicates severe drought.  Runs  of consecutive months
with PDSI  values  of  -3.0 or  less were computed  for the period of
record, and the number of consecutive  drought months expected once
in 100 years of record was computed.

     Size of drought disturbance is estimated in  two ways.  First,
the  map  presentations  of  intensity  and  duration provide  some
indication of the area impacted by drought of  similar character.
A second estimate is  presented in a decadal summary.  In this case,
the percent  of  the  New  England region impacted by drought  of a
given  magnitude  is  estimated for  each year  of  the time series.
Although  similar  calculations could be performed  for  the entire
period of  record  and regional  statistics  computed, this kind of
pooled  summary should  be approached  with  caution.    There  are
several different characteristic drought episodes associated with
large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns, each having distinct
spatial and temporal characteristics.   An average, aggregate area
mean  could  be misleading.    A more  detailed  study  including
stratification by circulation pattern may be more  informative.  For
those  interested  in  trend detection, some scientists suggest that
greenhouse warming will first  be detected by noting changes in such
large-scale circulation patterns (Michaels and Hayden, 1987) .
II.B.4.  National Weather Service Cooperative Network Data

     Much  of  the climatological data  available  for  analysis are
from  the  National  Weather  Service's  (NWS)   cooperative  network
stations "summary of the day." These daily arrays contain 24-hour
maximum  temperature,  minimum  temperature,   total  precipitation,
snowfall and snow depth.  At present,  cooperative station density
is maintained nationally at a minimum of one  station  per 1600 km2.
Standard sample variables and methods of collection are detailed in
NWS  (1989).

     An  initial array  of  potential weather  sites were provided
based  on a minimum 30-year period-of-record,  current  reporting
status and completeness of record.   For  a given station in this
network,  several potential  inhomogeneities   are  usually present
(Karl and Quayle, 1988).  Changes  in instrument  location, the type
of  instrument,  the  local environment,  exposure and changes in
observational  procedures  average  about  five  to ten  potential
discontinuities per 100 years of record.   Karl and Williams  (1987)
provide  examples   of   the  magnitude  and  frequency  of  these
                                36

-------
inhomogeneities.

     Next, the CIS was used to associate each forest sampling area
(hexagon) in Figure 4 with a weather observing site. Climatological
data for  1990 which were  unavailable  from the  NCDC were obtained
from  the  Northeastern  Regional  Climate  Center   at  Cornell
University.

     Distributions  of stations and station distances  for  NEFHM
hexagons  and "nearest"  temperature  and  precipitation data  are
summarized  in Figures 10  and 11.    Overall,  43%  of  the sampling
sites have access to 30-year precipitation data within 15 km of the
site, 33% can utilize rainfall reports  from between  15 and  30 km
away and  24% of  sampling  locations must use data  more than  30 km
away.  The maximum distance is 106 km.  Most distances greater than
30 km are  for sampling hexagons located  in the population sparse
sections of northern Maine.

     Twenty-nine percent of sampling hexagons are within 15  km of
a cooperative temperature  site, while 28% of  sampling sites have
access to data  within  30  km and  33% of  sampling sites  must be
characterized by weather observations  more than 30  km distant.  The
maximum distance is 110 km.  All distances greater than 42 km are
again for sampling hexagons  located  in northern Maine.   Future
studies should examine the availability of Canadian  data  to fill
some of these gaps.

     The  significance of  the  spatial distribution  of available
climate  data for  future  forest and  climate analyses  should be
explicitly  addressed.  For  instance, the use of "nearest"  station
analysis  may be  adequate for  regional summaries  and status,  but
more  closely  associated  values,  perhaps  through  statistical
interpolation,  may be more appropriate for sampling point analysis
or for making associations between sampling points.   The  NWS and
the National Environmental Satellite  and Data Information Service
(NESDIS)  are in the process of considering various strategies for
modernizing the  cooperative network.  At  this  time,  the NWS does
not anticipate any major changes in cooperative network density or
station  locations  arising from  such  efforts (Robert Leffler,
personal Communication).

     Once the stations have been selected  and assigned to sampling
sites, climatological variables of  interest are designated.  Basic
variables  such  as  means  and  extremes  of  precipitation  and
temperature have been identified as important to the NEFHM program
by Brooks  et al.  (b,  in press) and Brooks  et  al. (c,  in press) .
The relationships between these variables and forest response are
fairly well known and  are presented in the climate summaries with
no additional explanation.  Additional climate variables have been
selected for analysis  based on the NEFHM project work plan, Solomon
et al.  (1984),   Kozlowski  (1985)  and Peer (1990).     Cumulative
growing degree days,  last spring freeze and warm  spring snowfall

                                37

-------
Figure 10.   Distance between "nearest" cooperative temperature
            observation sites and potential NEFHM sampling
            hexagons.
                                          DISTANCE FROM FHM SAMPLE
                                          TO NEAREST COOPERATIVE SITE
                                             0  to  15  k i Iome t e r s

                                             15  to  30  k i Iome t e r s

                                             more  than  30  kilometers
                              3P

-------
Figure 11.   Distance between "nearest" cooperative precipitation
            observation sites and potential NEFHM sampling
            hexagons.
    o   •  o  o  •
                                         DISTANCE FROM FHM SAMPLE
                                         TO NEAREST COOPERATIVE SITE
                                            0  to  15  kilometers
                                            15  to  30  kilometers
                                            more  than  30  kil ome t e r s
                              39

-------
dates  were selected.   Since the  availability  and use  of these
secondary  data  may  be   less   obvious,   their  derivation  and
relationship to  forest physiology  and monitored response will be
discussed  in some detail.

     Disturbance regime characteristics are summarized in  a similar
fashion for each of  these  primary  and secondary variables.  Mean
conditions are  determined  for the baseline  summary to delineate
geographic  and climatological  boundaries for  ecosystems.   For
instance,  high elevation  locations  can  often  be  identified by
regions of cool seasonal temperatures.  Rain  shadow  effects can be
detected  as  precipitation minima  on  the  leeward  side  of these
cooler temperature areas.  If we assume that at each location the
distribution of weather observations approximates the normal, the
mean also  approximates the mode and so is a measure of  greatest
frequency.

     As  in the case of  drought,  disturbance magnitude  can  be a
function of both intensity  and duration.  The PDSI relates present
conditions to historical record for a particular area.  The index
at a point in time  captures both intensity and duration aspects of
drought.  For  instance, an equally negative (severe)  drought stress
could  represent  a short duration  intense event  as well  as the
cumulative effects of  long duration less intense events.   This is
another reason  that  time  series analysis  of PDSI  is  a  far  more
useful tool than single  value presentations.  No such integrated
measures  apropos  to  forest  ecosystems  exist  for the  climate
variables  included in this discussion.

     An  alternative  approach is  to  use  event  likelihood   as a
surrogate  for  magnitude  of intensity.  Under this  system,  it is
assumed that existing  vegetation has  adapted to prevailing  (most
frequent)  climatological means  and variability.   Excursions  from
these  conditions  represent  situations  that  could  result  in
ecosystem change.  The more unusual the event, the more likely it
is that some change will result.  In this sense, frequency defines
the magnitude of the disturbance (stress).   Following this system
we will arbitrarily declare an event with  a local return period of
1 in 20 years  to be  mildly stressful  (i.e.,  there is some chance
that an  ecosystem  change will  result).   An event  with  a return
period of 1 in 50 years is moderately stressful (i.e., there is a
moderate chance that ecosystem change will result).  Using Figure
3 as an endpoint,  an event with a  1  in 100 year return period is
considered to be extremely  stressful(  i.e., it is likely that some
ecosystem change will result from this event).

     For this report, these probabilities have been  estimated from
the instrumental record.  Relatively few stations in the reporting
network have 100 or  more years  of  recorded observations.  Values
for returns greater  than 50  years  represent  only rough estimates
based on the most recent history.   Statistical techniques exist to
estimate more  accurate  values  of rare events and should be explored

                                40

-------
in future studies.

     Disturbance size is characterized  by  the percent of the New
England region  reporting a  specified  level of disturbance.   An
integrated size, frequency and intensity analysis is presented and
discussed in the decadal climate analysis  (section III).


II.B.4.a.  Growing Degree Days

     Solomon et al.  (1984)  and  Peer (1990)  provide  examples of
research associating cumulative growing  degree days (GDD) directly
to forest growth.   GDDs are a specific example of the heat unit
concept. This  represents a  measure  of  the energy available for
biologic activity or growth. The heat unit  has proven to be useful
in a variety of biological settings. For instance,  cumulative GDD
totals  are  associated with  winter  wheat  phenology  in Nuttonson
(1955).  They are  used  to  limit the number  of daily timesteps
permitted for carbon transfer  in corn plants  in Jones and Kiniry
(1986).  The use of degree day  totals  to  predict   Southern Pine
Beetle  larvel  survival  and generation  survival are  discussed in
Gagne et al. (1980) .    Species  specific GDD ranges as used in a
forest  stand simulation model  are  summarized in Solomon  et al.
(1984).

     GDDs are usually computed as a temperature deviation from some
physiologically  significant base temperature.   Upper  and lower
temperature thresholds representing limiting conditions may  also be
defined.   In these cases,  GDDs are not computed  (i.e.,  GDD=0).
Solomon et al.(1984) states that forest processes begin between 0
and 10°C.  According to Kozlowski (1985), growth of most trees is
optimal between 20 and 35°C, depending on the  species.  A GDD base
of 10°C is  used for this  illustration.    A   lower  threshold is
defined as  a 24-hour minimum temperature of 0°C. No explicit upper
"capping" temperature is used.   Small annual GDD sums are assumed
to represent unfavorable growth  conditions and are highlighted in
the climate stress analysis.  Physical interpretation of GDDs must
be done cautiously-  For instance, similar  GDD totals could result
from either  long periods of mild temperature  conditions or short
periods of  extremely warm temperatures.  Growth response could vary
markedly given these two sets of conditions.


II.B.4.b.  Last Spring Freeze

     Primary  forest response  to  late  spring hard  freezes are
defoliation and, in extreme  cases, death.  Gerardi and Grimm (1979)
summarize  physiological  stress to trees  as  the  result  of
defoliation.  Stress on  individual trees depends upon the species,
duration and  degree  of  defoliation,  stand  site,   location of
defoliation in the tree  crown and the age and health of the  tree at
the time defoliation  occurs.  Defoliation also  affects seed and

                                f.l

-------
flower production, wood quality,  foliation timing, respiration and
efficiency  of photosynthesis, size,  abundance and  food storage
capacity, metabolic food conversion pathways and hormone production
in much the same way as drought.  Removal  of new foliage, such as
that at first flush in the spring,  decreases growth of the upper
stem more than in  the  lower stem.   Late season defoliation (from
early freezes or warm  snow events)  reduces twigs of woody tissue
and subjects  them  to winter damage.   Specific growth losses from
defoliation include reduced height growth, radial growth losses and
reduction of shoot  elongation. Stomatal resistance to transpiration
is also affected by defoliation.   This resistance is less in fully
emerged,  secondary foliage produced  after  defoliation than  in
primary foliage that has  escaped  defoliation  in oak  and  aspen;
however, as  leaf  surface area declines,  the demand for moisture
decreases.  The decreased demand for moisture improves the internal
water balance of defoliated trees if ample soil water is available;
but  defoliation  also  may  increase  tree  hydration.    Drought
compounds the effects on the physiological make-up of trees during
and after defoliation.

     A  knowledge   of   interactive   effects   of  natural   and
anthropogenic  disturbance  factors  is  also  critical if  climate
change trends are  to be detected.   Forest response  to  winter or
freezing conditions is a good example of interacting stressors.
For instance, an exhaustive treatment of the response of red spruce
to winter conditions alone and in combination with anthropogenic
disturbances  (ozone, SO2,  NO2 and acid deposition) is contained in
Adams and Eagar (1989).  A second summary  that  focuses exclusively
on the ecosystem-wide impacts of nitrogen  deposition is presented
in Aber et al. (1989).  Both reports  discuss the effect of nitrogen
deposition on the development of frost-hardiness in spruce. These
research results could mean that future changes in freeze related
foliar  damage to  New  England  forests could  be  in response  to
changing anthropogenic  stressors rather than  an  indication  of a
changing freeze disturbance regime.

     A  freeze  analysis  can  be used to  confirm or  supplement
observations of adverse weather conditions that might cause growth
decline and  tree  mortality. Late  spring  freezes  do not  leave
sufficient   sign   for   later  identification   even   though,   in
combination with other stresses,  they have been implicated in most
forest  declines (USDA  Forest  Service, no date).    Knowledge  of
possible climate related defoliation  is also important for pest and
disease studies. Defoliation resulting from  freezing temperatures
may combine with later  pest related defoliation to contribute to
tree mortality.  Spring freeze defoliation can remove a source of
food  for  pests and  actually  act   to curb  epidemics.    Spring
defoliation can also weaken trees and predispose them to later pest
infestation.  For example, Gerardi and Grimm (1979) report that the
action of  shoestring root rot fungus, Arnillaria mellia, and the
two-lined chestnut borer,  Agrilus bilineatus in the outer wood may


                                42

-------
be controlled by the chemical changes occurring there as a result
of defoliation.

     Other factors related to frost/freeze damage are the duration
of  stressful  temperatures and  the  degree  of  cold  hardiness in
affected plant tissues at the time of freeze  (Kozlowski, 1985). The
NWS Cooperative Observer data set provides  only 24-hour extremes
with no  indication of  persistence  within the  day-  Supplemental
hourly data are available from a limited number of National Weather
Service First and  Second Order observing stations. These data could
be used to perform more  detailed studies if freeze duration within
a 24-hour period  is determined  to be  a critical factor.  A second
analysis could focus on minimum temperatures preceding the freeze
event (cold hardiness)  and the duration across 24-hour periods of
the freezing  event.   In the  present  analysis,  a  hard  freeze is
recorded if the 24-hr minimum temperature is -2.2°C or colder.


II.B.4.C  Last Spring Snowfall

     Snow has a variety of implications for forest ecosystem health
and productivity.  An insulating blanket  of  snow protects tender
understory species from  winter desiccation or damage from periodic
soil heaving.  Snow also provides an  important  source of surface
water  storage.    Wintertime   evapotranspiration   is  low,   and
substantial  supplies  of moisture can be held  until spring.   A
slowly melting layer of snow  in the spring  releases  moisture and
nutrients in a fashion that permits maximum vertical infiltration
and minimum surface erosion.

     When ice crystals fall through a layer of relatively warm air,
the crystal surface melts.   These "wet"  flakes  then  stick to any
surface they come in  contact  with.   The accumulated weight of this
trapped liquid water on leaves  and  branches  causes loss of limbs
and uprooting  of  entire trees.   One particular case,  the "warm
snowstorm of  May  9,  1977"  is  discussed  in Gedzelman  and Lewis
(1990) .    This storm  was  one  of   the latest occurring  major
snowstorms  in the  lower  Hudson River  Valley  on  record.   The
accumulated weight of the  wet snow on  newly sprouted leaves caused
extensive destruction  to trees (see  impacts  of  defoliation in
section II.B.4.b.).

     A traditional source of snowfall data is the NWS Cooperative
Observer Network.   Unfortunately, these data are particularly poor
in terms of quality control  and spatial coverage.   But when used
with caution,  they can provide valuable information  for forest
scientists.    For  example,  it is difficult to  determine from the
digitized summary-of-day reports if a snowfall  event was warm or
cold.    As  an alternative  to  extensive  archival research,  the
present study assumes that if, at a particular  location, a spring
snowfall event is  expected on a later spring date fewer than one
                                43

-------
year in 20, it is likely to be a warm snow event.

     A  discussion of snow  data error  and  bias is  presented in
Robinson (1988) .   Although unavailable for the present study, a new
quality  controlled  set  of  snowfall   data  have  recently  been
developed based on the work of Robinson and can be ordered from the
National Climatic Data  Center.   Future  work should consider warm
fall snow events, use of the Robinson data base and more accurate
determination of event occurrence from the digitized record.


II.C  Display Technology (CIS)

    Geographic Information System (GIS)  software was used to study
these spatial  relationships between the  climatology of  the  New
England  area  and  the  sampling  locations  in  the Forest  Health
Monitoring  Project.   The  GIS  system  used  for the  display  and
analysis of these relationships was Environmental Systems Research
Institute's ARC/INFO. The types of spatial analysis performed were
proximity analysis,  surface modeling and overlay  analysis.   The
procedures  used  for each of  these three analyses are  discussed
below.

     For the  proximity  analysis, the  GIS was  used  to  associate
conditions measured at nearby National Weather Service Cooperative
Observer locations with  the 263 potential NEFHM sampling locations.
The  ARC/INFO  "NEAR"  command was  used to  identify   the  closest
cooperative observer station  for each of the  263  NEFHM sampling
locations.    Once identified,  the information  from  the observer
station is  linked to the associated NEFHM  sampling  location  and
used  to  characterize  the  likelihood  of  forest  response  to
climatological disturbances.

     Surface  models  were  created  from  long  term  cooperative
observer station data for annual growing degree  days, date of last
spring  freeze  and  date of  last spring  snowfall using  Dynamic
Graphics' Interactive Surface Modeling (ISM)  software.  The contour
lines generated  from ISM during the modeling  process  were then
moved to ARC/INFO for overlay and display purposes.

     The GIS  was then  used  in the final overlay  analysis which
characterizes  individual  sampling hexagons  from a weather event
perspective. This process involves displaying and analyzing events
that  occur  in  the  same  spatial  domain.    The events analyzed
included wind,  hail and  tornado events.   The  analysis produced maps
of individual hexagon sampling sites displaying with the associated
weather events that have occurred at  that  location.  This analysis
also  produced  descriptive  statistics  on the  number of  weather
events  (intersections) occurring within the sampling frame of 263
NEFHM locations.
                                44

-------
     These analytical techniques were also used in combination to
further  analyze  relationships.   For  example,  to estimate  the
growing degree days at a particular sampling location the surface
model  for  the growing  degree  days  was  overlaid  on the  sample
locations.   Similar analyses were performed for the  spring snow and
freeze data.
II.D. Summary

     Disturbance regime  climatology  examples have  been prepared
targeted to  the joint,  1990 EPA  EMAP-forest  and  NEFHM project
conducted in six states in the northeastern United States.  Weather
and  climate databases  have  been  assembled  from  a variety  of
sources.   Secondary or derived variables of potential interest to
these programs have been  identified.  The physiological impacts of
these variables on  forest  ecosystems have  been summarized  and
expected forest responses were  noted.    Table  6 summarizes  all
climate  disturbance  products  developed  using  the  techniques
discussed in Chapter II that  are  applied to the New England region
in Chapter III.  A blank entry  in Table  6  indicates disturbance
attributes that have not been quantified for this report.
Table 6.  Examples
          England
of climate disturbance  (stress)
(see Chapter III).
products for New
CLIMATE VARIABLE
Tornadoes
Wind
Tropical Cyclone
Drought
Temperature
Precipitation
Growing Degree
Days
Late Spring
Freeze
Late Spring
Snowfall
FREQUENCY
intra-annual
intra-annual
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
MAGNITUDE
intensity
only

intensity
only
intensity
duration
intensity
only
intensity
only
intensity
only
intensity
only
intensity
only
SIZE
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
                                45

-------
III.  Example Disturbance Climatologies

III.A.  Introduction

     The results presented below represent examples of disturbance
(stress) climatologies.   The  use  of,  and caveats associated with
these products are discussed.  A portion of this material already
appears in Brooks  et  al.  (b,  in press) and Brooks  et  al.  (c, in
press) and is being used  by  the EMAP  Forest and Assessment teams
(Kucera  and  Martin,  1991).    Further  operational  and  research
applications are anticipated in the future.


III.B.  Baseline Conditions (1961-1990)

     The first analysis characterizes  aspects of the long-term, or
background climate of the New England region.   Using  the earlier
analogy of ecological persistence  and recurrence,  the background
climate defines, in part,  the "bounds" for the recurring ecosystem
states.   Table  7  summarizes  elements of  a disturbance  regime
climatology for which baseline examples have been developed.  With
the  exception  of  event  duration,  frequency   and  magnitude  of
disturbance  (stress)   are well  represented  at  this  level  of
analysis.  In most  cases,  event size is not characterized until the
decadal analysis.
Table 7.  Elements of a New England disturbance regime climatology
          for which baseline examples have been developed.
CLIMATE VARIABLE
Tornadoes
Wind
Tropical Cyclone
Drought
Temperature
Precipitation
Growing Degree
Days
Late Spring
Freeze
Late spring
Snowfall
FREQUENCY
intra-annual
intra-annual
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
MAGNITUDE
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
SIZE
X

X






                                46

-------
III. B.I.  Severe Weather and Tropical Cyclones

     These phenomena are presented together because their primary
impact  on  forest ecosystems is  through windthrow.   The primary
difference  between these  events  is  their  frequency  and  size.
Disturbance  frequency  is  presented   in  terms  of  intra-annual
variability for  wind and tornado  events  and by  enumeration for
tropical cyclones.   Time series  are  not appropriate  for severe
weather events because of observational biases discussed previously
and because of the infrequency of cyclone events.

     Figure 5  illustrated that there have been numerous tornado and
damaging wind event reports  throughout New England during the last
30 years.   There has been confirmation of  278  tornadoes and 1351
damaging wind  reports in  the region from  1961  through September,
1990.  Figure  12  summarizes the  intra-annual frequency distribution
of these events.  Figure 12 shows that  the within-year distribution
of wind and tornado events are similar, with a wintertime minimum
and July maximum.  This  is to be  expected since both phenomena are
generated by similar kinds of unstable atmospheric conditions.
Figure 12.
           Relative intra-annual frequency of tornado and damaging
            wind events in New England, 1961-1990.
          o

          CD
          Z3
          O~
          CD
              1OO
               80
               6O
               4-0
               20
                                     Total -  278 ^Zl tornado
                                     Total  - 1351 E23 wind
                                        r§
                                      2 Z
                                              I7L_ r-T_
                    1  2  3  A  5   6  7  8  9  1O  11  12

                               Month

     Figure  13  contains  a  summary  of the  distribution  of  New
England tornado magnitude (F-scale rating).   No intensity analysis
is performed  for  damaging winds because of  poor records of  peak
gusts.  Windspeeds  associated with F-0 events break branches off
trees and  push  over shallow-rooted  trees.   Windspeed  associated
with any event rated F-2 or higher can  result in large  trees being
snapped or uprooted. Figure 14 indicates that these events account
for nearly  30%  (about 83) of  all  tornadoes  reported since  1961.
                                47

-------
There  have been  approximately three  tornado  events containing
windspeeds in excess of 89 ms'1.
Figure 13.  Distribution of tornado intensity for New England,
            1961-1990.
           o

           CD
           CT
           CL5
               1OO
                BO
                eo
4O
                20
                                             Total «  278
                            1      2      3

                               F-Scale
     The  majority of reported  tornadoes either  touch-down only
briefly (point events) or have such short paths that they are not
recorded.  Based on the available record, however, the average of
2.59 km2 is a conservative estimate of the area impacted by tornadic
events each year.  The largest documented area impacted  in a single
year between 1961 and 1990 was 24 km2.  This damage was generated
by three storms reported in 1979.

     Although not as  common as tornado  or  wind events, tropical
cyclones pass through the  New England area with some regularity.
Table 8 enumerates these events  and estimates storm strength and
the states impacted.  There  have  been nine storms in the last 30
years capable of  damaging  the forest canopy.  The last confirmed
storm (through September,  1990)  capable of producing significant
windthrow in the  New  England states  occurred  in  1976.   The most
frequently impacted states are Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine
and New Hampshire.  For  more detailed information concerning the
tracks and life stages of these events, see Neumann et al  (1990).
                                48

-------
Table 8.  Tropical cyclones impinging on the New England states,
                  1961-1990.
Year
1961
1961
1966
1971
1971
1972
1976
1979
1979
1985
1988
Name
-
Esther
Alma
Doria
Heidi
Carrie
Belle
Frederic
David
Gloria
Chris
Life
Stage*
T
D
EX
T EX
T EX
EX
H T
T EX
T EX
EX
EX
Dates
Sept 12-15
Sept 11-26
June 4-14
Aug 20-29
Sept 10-14
Aug 2 9 -Sept 5
Aug 6-10
Aug 29-Sept 14
Aug 25-Sept 7
Sept 16-Oct 1
Aug 21-29
States
Impacted
CT,MA,ME,NH
ME
MA
CT,MA,ME,NH
ME
ME
CT , MA , ME , NH
VT
ME,NH,VT
CT,MA,ME,NH
CT,MA

* H = Hurricane (windspeeds equivalent to F-l or greater)
T = Tropical Storm (windspeeds equivalent to F-0 to F-l)
EX = Extratropical Storm (windspeeds may vary from F-0 to F-l)
D = Tropical Depression (windspeeds of F-0 or less)
                               49

-------
III.B.2.  Temperature and Precipitation


     There are many possible averaging periods and derived variable
options  to represent  temperature and  precipitation conditions.
Temperature  extremes  (annual maximum  and  minimum)  and  annual
precipitation  (October  through  September)   were  identified  as
particularly useful in monitoring forest health in the Northeastern
U.S. (Brooks, et al., b, in press). Persistence characteristics of
these variables are summarized in contour maps of mean conditions.
Frequency is illustrated by weighted  time series  graphs.  Relative
magnitude of disturbance can  be  visually  estimated from the time
series presentation.  No size  (area)  summary  is presented at this
time.

     Contour map summaries  of  the most recent 3O years for mean New
England  precipitation  and  temperature extremes  are  presented in
Figures  14,  15 and 16.   Two features make these  products unique.
First, atlas summaries have often focussed on the presentation of
all  available  data,  rather  than   data  selected  for  specific
applications.   In this study, only  data from stations  that have
been associated with NEFHM program sampling locations are analyzed.
The selected station data are then spatially  smoothed using a  bi-
harmonic cubic spline to generate spatial contours.  The degree to
which these data,  some of which are  from instruments located more
than  40  km  away  from the   FHM sampling   location,   represent
conditions at a monitoring  site has yet to be  explicitly addressed.
Statistical  estimation  techniques,  such as  kriging  or  cokriging
could be applied to climate means (e.g., Dingman  et al.,  1988).
Interpolation of extreme values such  as  annual maximum and minimum
temperature  is  significantly more  complex.  The  selection  of
appropriate  interpolation  techniques should be  dictated  by the
needs of the monitoring program and will be addressed  in future
research.

     A second  feature  of the  contour presentation  is that annual
values are  based on the months  October through  September rather
than a calendar year.  This period was chosen so  that a 1990 value
represents events  leading up to and  including the forest sampling
period and does not overlap previous  or  following growing seasons.
All values on  contour  or time series graphs  are  labeled with the
calendar year in which the  averaging  period ends.  This label also
corresponds  to the  year  containing months   of  significant  tree
growth.

     The most  obvious  ecological boundary  effects  illustrated by
these figures are  a function of latitude and  elevation.   Latitude
and  elevation  play  an  important  part  in   patterns  of  annual
precipitation  (Figure  14) .    Moist  conditions  prevail   in the
southern  portion  of  New  England and  on the windward  side  of
mountain  peaks and  extensive mountain ranges.    Slightly  drier
conditions are observed in the colder more northern latitudes and

                                50

-------
Figure 14.   Mean  annual  New England  precipitation,  1961-1990
                                           PRECIPITATION
                                           (in  centime ten)
                                                less than  45.0
                                           ITTT1 45.0 to   60.0
                                                60.0 to   75.0
                                                75.0 to   90.0
                                                90.0 to  105.0
                                                105.0 to  120.0
                                                120.0 to  135.0
                                                135.0 to  150.0
                                                150.0 to  165.0
                                                165.0 to  180.0
                                                180.0 and  over
                                     51

-------
leeward of  significant  mountain  ranges.   Latitudinal affects are
also reflected by zonal  bands of northward-decreasing temperatures
in homogeneous  geographic areas  and are most  notable in minimum
temperature patterns  (Figures  15 and 16) .   Distortions of these
broad patterns occur in  mountainous areas.  Elevation does not play
a dominant role in annual minimum temperature patterns across New
England,  but  is  more  apparent   in  patterns  of annual maximum
temperature.

     Temporal variability of regional temperature and precipitation
variables  can  be  visually summarized  by  weighted  time  series
(Figures  17,  18,  19  and 20).    Since  the NEFHM sampling design
generates a nearly uniform grid of points, weighted  area  means are
constructed by  associating climate  values  with their appropriate
sampling hexagons, summing and dividing  the  results by the total
number of hexagons in the region.

     Area-weighted annual precipitation  in New  England ranges from
a low of 78.7 cm in 1965 to a high of 140 cm in  1983  (Figure 17).
The time series  appears  equally variable throughout the 30-years of
data  and  no  statistically  significant  linear  trend   has  been
detected.  The largest year-to-year change, 45 cm, occurs between
1984 and 1985.

     Inter-annual variability  is a  notable  feature  in  the  time
series of area-weighted minimum temperatures (Figure 18).  Values
range from -32°C during  1971 to -23.5°C during 1980.   Particularly
large year-to-year variability is noted  from  1979 through 1985.  A
small but statistically  significant linear trend of .18 °C/year has
been estimated for the  30-year time series.

     Periods of smaller year-to-year change  are seen in the time
series of area-weighted annual maximum  temperatures (Figure 19).
The greatest year-to-year  change  occurred  between 1974  and 1975.
1974 was such an extreme year that it dominates  our perception of
the  slope.    The  combined  effect of  area-weighted  maximum  and
minimum temperature trends could  narrow annual temperature ranges.
This,  in  fact  is the  case.    A significant  linear trend  with
negative  slope  equal to  that  determined for  the annual minimum
temperature has been estimated.   Figure 20  indicates   increased
annual range variability beginning in 1979.  Such possible trends
in  regional  climatological   averages   and  variability  must  be
interpreted carefully.   For  instance,  for global or hemispheric
averages, it is likely that random inhomogeneities  in the station
data will tend  to cancel each  other out (Karl and Quayle, 1988).
This is not as likely in the calculation  of regional  averages where
far fewer stations are used.  Furthermore, station inhomogeneities
add artificial variance to the time series.
                                52

-------
Figure 15.   Mean annual maximum New England temperature, 1961-1990
                                                      DEGREES CENTIGRADE
                                                           15.0  to is.o
                                                           18.0  to 21 .0
                                                           21.0  to 24.0
                                                      7777K  24.0  to 27.0
                                                           27.0  to 30.0
                                                           30.0  to 33.0
                                                           33.0  to 36.0
                                                           36.0  to 39.0
                                    53

-------
Figure 16.  Mean annual minimum New England temperature,  1961-1990,
                                                      DEGREES  CENTIGRADE
                                                      ••I -41.0 to -38.0
                                                           -38.0 to -35.0
                                                           -35.0 to -32.0
                                                           -32.0 to -29.0
                                                           -29.0 to -26.0
                                                           -26.0 to -23.0
                                                           -23.0 to -20.0
                                                           -20.0 to -17.0
                                                           -17.0 to -14.0
                                    54

-------
Figure  17,
      Area weighted time  series of annual New England
      precipitation  (cm),  1961-1990.
   p
   R
   E
   c
   i
   p
   i
   T
   A
   T
   I
   O
   N
        CM
       140
130 '



120 '



110


100


 90



 80
        70 i,—
         1960
                   1970
1980
                                                     1990
                                  YEAR
Figure 18.  Area weighted time series of annual minimum New England
             temperatures (°C), 1961-1990.
   T
   E
   M
   P
   E
   R
   A
   T
   U
   R
   E
  C
-23 '

-24

-25 '

-26

-27 1

-28

-29

-30

-31

-32

-33
        I960
                         1970
                                    1980
                 1990
                                  TEAR
                                  55

-------
Figure  19.  Area weighted time series of annual maximum New England
             temperatures (°C), 1961-1990.
      T
      E
      M
      P
      E
      R
      A
      T
      U
      R
      E
          C
         37
         36
35
34
33
         32
         31 V-
          1960
                           1970
                                   1980
                1990
                                   TEAR
Figure 20.   Area weighted  time series of annual New England
             temperature range (°C), 1961-1990.
     R
     A
     N
     G
     E
 C
66

65

64

63

62

61

60

59

58

57

56
 1960
                           1970
I960
1990
                                   YEAR
                                 56

-------
     In the New England forest case, such inhomogeneities may not
represent a significant problem  in  well instrumented areas where
each  station  may  represent  from  1  to 3  sampling  locations.
However, significant bias  may be introduced into a time series when
a  larger  number  of forest sites must be  represented by a single
weather observation.  In New England, all such cases occur in Maine
-  the  state which also  dominates  the region  in  area.  Thus,  a
situation exists  in which the greatest  influence on the regional
estimate is derived from the region with the  least data.  Errors in
sparsely  instrumented areas of Maine  could  easily  be responsible
for visually detected trends  in the regional  time  series (e.g.,
Figure 17).  If  studies of ecosystem  behavior  at these latitudes
are considered to  be critical  for  climate trend detection  and
impact analyses,  additional long-term climate observation sites are
needed.

     The  accuracy of climatological data and  summaries aside,  a
second fundamental question concerns the importance of such changes
for forest ecosystems.  For instance,  if we assume  that existing
vegetation is  ideally adapted to prevailing climatological means
and extremes,  how great a change is  necessary before detectable
ecosystem changes occur?   Although the majority  of plant growth and
development  can  be  generalized  as  responding to  modal  (most
frequent or dominant) climate conditions,  it  is extreme conditions
or events that most severely constrain species range  and potential
productivity.  Responses  to trends  such as  that noted  in annual
temperature range would most likely be observed at the margins of
species range (ecotones).   Warmer minimum temperatures (Figure 18)
could create conditions in these areas favorable for expansion of
marginal  southern species into existing  ecotones,  or facilitate
expansion of the ecotone  itself.  Although  answers  to  some "how
important  is  this?"  questions   are  already  available  in  the
literature, other such  questions require more  detailed modeling
studies.  The goal of this report is to develop ways  of describing
climatological conditions so that  associations between  climate
conditions (e.g.  means,  trends and variability) and  indicators of
forest status and health can be postulated and tested.  This is a
fundamental EMAP activity.  If such associations  can  be confirmed,
then research aimed towards the development of predictive response
models can  be  pursued.    This  could occur either within  the FHM
program of entirely outside the EMAP/FHM initiative.


III.B.3  Drought

     Drought frequency,  intensity and duration products have been
prepared as a baseline analysis.  The spatially  aggregate nature of
the drought database makes contour presentations  inappropriate.  A
time series of regional mean  growing season PDSI can be used to
estimate  drought frequency (Figure 21) .   In  this  case,  Climate
Division  (CD)  PDSI values were  assigned to each  NEFHM sampling
hexagon within the  division.  The 1960s are dominated by drought

                                57

-------
Figure  21.
Area weighted timeseries of  mean growing season  PDSI,
1961-1990.
             PDSI
                3


                2


                1


                0


               -1


               -2


               -3 1
               -4
                I960
                     1970
1980
1990
                                             YEAR
             GE 4.00  EXTREMELY WET
             3.99 - 3.00 VERY WET
             2.99 - 2.00 MODERATELY WET
             I.99 - I.00 SLIGHTLY  WET
             0.99 - 0.50 INCIPIENT WET
             0.49 TO -0.49 NORMAL
                          -0.50 TO -0.99  INCIPIENT DROUGHT
                          -1.00 TO -1.99  MILD DROUGHT
                          -2.00 TO -2.99  MODERATE DROUGHT
                          -3.00 TO -3.99  SEVERE DROUGHT
                          LE -4.00 EXTREME DROUGHT
                                      58

-------
conditions that peak at a region-wide PDSI value of nearly -4.0 in
1965.   This  was  followed  in  the  early  to  mid  1970s by  wet
conditions.  Regional growing season PDSI values have ranged from
"slightly dry" (-1.50)  to "slightly wet"  (+1.50) from 1975 through
1990.

     Drought  magnitude is described  by intensity  and  duration.
Based on  relative  frequency, Figure 22  contains  monthly CD PDSI
values expected to occur once in 100 calendar years of record.
Figure  3a   indicates   that  disturbances  of  this   order  are
hierarchically compatible with a number of ecological process and
responses.   Since  nearly  100 years  of computed  PDSI  values  are
available  for analysis  (1895-1990),  no statistical modeling is
required  and  these  estimates may be considered to  be  relatively
accurate  representation  of  drought  disturbance  events.    Most
intense drought conditions have  occurred  in coastal Maine, western
and   southern  Vermont,   western   and  coastal   Massachusetts,
northwestern and coastal Connecticut.

     New  England  drought  magnitude   expressed   as  duration  is
summarized  in Figure 23.   Over the past  96  years, each  CD  has
averaged 28 multiple-month droughts of PDSI equal  to or less than
-2.00.    The  values shown  on  Figure 23  were computed from  a
frequency analysis of  these  data,  and  represent drought duration
expected once in 100 such multiple-month events.   Length of the 1
in   100   chance  drought  varies  from  23  months   in  Eastern
Massachusetts  to  42  months  in  Western  Vermont.    There  is
substantially more geographic variability  in New  England drought
persistence than in drought  intensity.


III.B.4.  Growing Degree Days

     A contour map  of mean growing  degree days and a weighted time
series  are  presented as  baseline  products  (Figures 24  and 25) .
Return periods have  also  been calculated and will be used in the
decadal analysis.

     Figure  24  indicates  the   fewest  number  of  degree  days in
northern Maine and the  mountains of New Hampshire.  A tongue of GDD
maximums  follows the  Connecticut  River valley  northward  into
Massachusetts.  Other areas of warmth center on major metropolitan
areas of Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

     An area  weighted  time series  of  annual GDD  is presented in
Figure 25.  No trend is evident in the time series.  A maximum of
1030 GDD  is estimated in  1988.   A minimum  value of 810  GDD is
estimated for 1986.  Maximum year-to-year  change  appears to have
occurred between 1986 and 1987.
                                59

-------
Figure 22.  Monthly PDSI values for New England with a l in 100
            year chance of occurrence, 1895-1990.

-------
Figure 23.
Duration of New England drought episode  (PDSI  with
consecutive months of -2.0 or less) with a  1  in  100
event chance of occurrence, 1895-1990.
  NUMBER  OF  CONSECUTIVE
  • GE  50  MONTHS     H
  • 49  TO  40  MONTHS
  • 39  TO  30  MONTHS
  OH 29  TO  20  MONTHS
     19  TO  10  MONTHS
MONTHS POSI LE -2
10  TO  0  MONTHS
                                                      00
                               61

-------
Figure 24.
Mean annual New England growing degree  days
(base = 10°C,  lower limit = 0°C) ,  1961-1990.
                                62

-------
Figure 25.  Area weighted timeseries of  annual New England  growing
            degree days (base = 10°C, lower limit = 0°C) , 1961-1990.
      1100
      1000
   D   900
   D
       800
       700 <
         I960
1970             1980
        YEAR
1990
                                63

-------
III.B.5.  Last Spring Freeze

     A contour map of the mean last date on which a minimum daily
temperature  of  -2.2°C  or less  is  reported  in  the spring  and a
weighted  time series of  these dates  are presented  as baseline
products  (Figures 26 and 27) .   Return  periods  have  also been
calculated and will be used in the decadal analysis.

     Figure 26 shows essentially the same latitudinal and elevation
patterns as GDD.   On  average,  the latest spring freeze dates occur
at  northern  latitudes  and  at  higher  elevations.     Freezing
temperatures  disappear  earliest  in the  spring along  the eastern
seacoast and large metropolitan areas.

     Figure 27 contains  an area-weighted time series of last spring
freeze dates.  Between 1960  and 1980,  the average date of the last
spring  hard  freeze  event  occurs  progressively  earlier in  the
season.   Although Figure 27  could be  interpreted to  reflect a
changing  climate  in  New England,  other  potential  sources  of
observational or recording error should be investigated in future
studies.  One potential  source of error reported in Karl and Quayle
(1988) involves shifts in time of observation from evening
to a morning observation.  This can create cooling bias in the data
record.
III.B.6.  Last Spring Snowfall

     A  contour  map of the  30-year  mean date of the  last spring
snowfall and a weighted time series of these dates are presented as
baseline products  (Figures  28 and 29) .  No accumulation (snow-on-
the-ground)  is  considered  because  of  the poor quality  of these
data.  This variable, then, represents a risk of snow damage, but
not that damage  has actually occurred.  The later in the spring the
snow event occurs, the more severe the  forest stress is assumed to
be and  the greater the  likelihood of defoliation.   No underlying
physical assumptions concerning atmospheric conditions conducive to
warm snow events are made,  and this presentation is meant only to
be illustrative.

     Figure  28   suggests  a geographic  pattern of  last  season
snowfall similar to that of GDDs  and late  spring hard freeze dates
with at least one  interesting exception.  An unusual area of warm
and dry conditions  (last  snowfall  prior  to March 1)  appears in
central Maine.  Although  this site is on the drier, leeward  side of
the Appalachian  Mountains,  the record  should  be  investigated to
further identify the source of this unusual signal.
                                64

-------
Figure  26.
Mean  date of last  spring hard freeze  (minimum
temperature of  -2.2°C  or less),  1961-1990.
                                            Dote of lost hard 
-------
Figure 27
     Area  weighted timeseries of  last spring hard freeze
     event dates (minimum temperature of  -2.2°C or less) in
     New England,  1961-1990.
       MO
    c
    A
    L
    E
    N
    D
    A
    R

    D
    A
    Y
130
       120
       110
         I960
                  1970
1980
                                                         1990
                                 YEAR
                                66

-------
Figure 28.   Mean date of  last spring snowfall,  1961-1990.
                                               Dote  of last  snowfall
                                                    before  March 1
                                                TTI  March  1  to Kerch  20
                                                ^  Morch  21  to April 9
                                                 ^H  Apri I  10  to Apri I 29
                                                    after  April 29
                                    67

-------
     Figure 29 contains an area-weighted time series of  last spring
snowfall  dates.   Although  the  earlier  record  (1961-1980)  is
difficult to interpret, there is a marked date increase  (later in
spring) in  the decade of the  1980s.   This,  in  combination with
regional freeze data  (Figure 27) suggests that during the  1980s the
risk of damage associated with late spring snowfall events may have
increased.  Late  spring  hard freeze events  that might delay bud
initiation occur earlier  in the spring  (Figure 27), while snowfall
events occur later (Figure 29).  Note that the term "risk" is used
here.   Given  the  present  dataset,   it  cannot  be stated  with
certainty that the number of damaging snow events  has  increased. It
does not  contain  the  information  needed to verify  the  moisture
content of the snow.   In the future, newly developed  snowfall data
sets, used in combination with synoptic  meteorological map analysis
could be used to more carefully define such events.
                                68

-------
Figure 29.  Area weighted timeseries of  last spring snowfall dates
             in New England,  1961-1990.
    c
    A
    L
    E
    N
    D
    A
    R

    D
    A
    Y
       130
       120
1 10
100
        90
        80
         I960
                  1970
1980
1990
                                 YEAR
                                69

-------
III.C.  Most Recent Decade  (1981-1990)

     In contrast  to  the 30-year climatology,  a  10-year study is
used to emphasize short-term variability of climate stress.  This
also represents more closely the regional response time of forest
ecosystems  to  chronic  climatological  stress.    Since detectable
ecosystem health  and productivity response  times  are relatively
slow, substantial data sets will be required before true ecological
trend analyses over relatively small areas can be  performed.  Under
the present EMAP Forests four year sampling design,  it  is estimated
that  detection  of  regional and  national  trends   in  response
indicators on  the order of 1% per year  is  expected within 10-15
years (Hunsaker and Carpenter, 1990) .

    The period 1981 to 1990 has been chosen to  illustrate regional
climate fluctuations within  a decade  which approximates the time
interval since the last USDA Forest Inventory Analysis  (FIA) Survey
(see table below).


                     DATES  OF LAST  FIA SURVEY
                       Connecticut       1984
                      Maine             1982
                      Massachusetts     1984
                      New Hampshire     1983
                      Rhode Island      1984
                      Vermont           1983
     Table 9 summarizes the characteristics  of the regional stress
regime for which sample climatologies covering the period 1981-1990
have been developed.   A comparison  of  Tables  8  and 9  shows a
greater  emphasis  on  spatial  characterization  in  the  decadal
analysis  (Table 9) than in the baseline study-   Since temperature
and precipitation have been addressed extensively in the baseline
discussion, they are omitted from the decade analysis.  As is the
case throughout all these example climatologies, no effective means
of wind event magnitude and areal extent characterization has been
identified.
                                70

-------
Table 9.  Elements of a New England disturbance regime climatology
          for which decadal examples have been developed.
CLIMATE VARIABLE
Tornadoes
Wind
Tropical Cyclone
Drought
Temperature
Precipitation
Growing Degree
Days
Late Spring
Freeze
Late spring
Snowfall
FREQUENCY
intra-annual
intra-annual
X
X


X
X
X
MAGNITUDE
X

X
X


X
X
X
SIZE
X

X
X


X
X
X
III.C.I.  Severe Weather and Tropical Cyclones

     The most recent decade has been relatively quiet in terms of
large scale windthrow events.  There has been a total of 58 tornado
events reported. The annual mean number of reported events dropped
from a 30-year value of 9 to only 6 per  year.  Seventy-five percent
of these storms were of strength F-2 or less.  Only two tornadoes
of strength F-3 or  greater were reported.   Annually,  the average
area impacted by tornadic events was only 1.6 km2.

     The number of damaging wind events has shown a marked increase
in the last decade.   It  is not clear  if this represents a physical
trend or if  it reflects changes in  reporting  techniques.   There
have been 832  damaging wind reports in the last decade.  The decade
average of 83  events each year is nearly double that of the last 30
years.  Incompleteness of data records prevents any generalization
of peak gusts or area impacted by these storms.

     Only two  tropical cyclone-spawned storm  systems passed through
New England in the  last  decade  (Table 8).  Both were classified as
extra-tropical  storms.   The  larger of  the two, Gloria,  passed
through  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  Maine  and New  Hampshire in
1985.
                                71

-------
     In summary, the most recent decade has generally lacked large-
scale  windthrow  events  such  as  tornadoes  and  well-developed
tropical  cyclones.   A  significant  increase  in  the  number  of
damaging wind events (most often described as downburst type events
associated with dissipating severe weather)  is suggested  by  the
data, but  verification of this increase  has not been  performed.
Research  by  Canham and Loucks   (1984)  for  downburst  events  in
Wisconsin suggests that forest damage from individual events should
be on the order of  1 km2  or  less.


III.C.2  Combined Stress (Disturbance) Analysis

     Figure  30  contains  a decadal  summary of drought, GDD sums,
spring freezes  and warm spring  snowfall events  in terms  of  the
percent of total area impacted.   Small GDD totals, spring freeze
and snowfall dates are included  if,  based on the  entire  climate
record for a station, the current value is expected to occur fewer
than once in 20 years. Although more extreme conditions such as a
100 year  freeze are  suggested  as appropriate  by Figure  3a,  the
relatively short period  of  record available does not support  the
direct calculation of these values.   Such rare  events might  be
statistically estimated through the use of extreme value theory in
future studies  (Mearns,  et al., 1984;  Katz  and Brown,  1991).
Figure 30.
          Percent of New England region impacted by climate
          stress, 1981-1990.
0
C£
LU
Q_
      100
      80
      60
      40
      20
                                              II freeze
                                                 gdd
                                                 snow
                                                 drought
            1981 1982  1983 1984  1985  1986 1987  1988 1989  1990

                               YEAR
                                72

-------
     In order to determine a  comparable  drought  return period,  a
frequency analysis  was performed  using the  minimum  PDSI  value
reported in each CD  during each October through September calendar
year.  Figure 31 presents the  PDSI values expected in each CD once
in every 20 calendar years.   These values range from -3.62 to
-4.10.    To  simplify calculations,  a value of  -4.0 was  used  to
declare a forest growth year to have  suffered under drought stress.
Figure 31.
Monthly PDSI values for New England with a 1 in 20 year
 chance  of occurrence, 1895-1990.
                               73

-------
     The  purposes  of  Figure  30  are  1)   to facilitate  visual
identification  of  short-term  trends in  forest  related climate
variables; 2) to identify the frequency  and  size of regional-scale
climate  events;  and  3)  to identify  associations  of  stressful
climate conditions.   This  figure  does  not  quantify the amount of
forest damage or forest response to these stresses.   The impact of
environmental stress will vary with ecological system (although all
of these  measures reflect local  conditions)  and  combinations of
stresses may result in threshold behavior (discontinuities) or non-
linear increases  in damage.  This figure  represents a consistent
intensity of stress across stressors and permits,  for this decade,
some generalizations  of size/frequency relationships.

     Figure  30  indicates that  one   drought event occurred (PDSI
during at least one month equal to or less than -4.00) in the New
England region during the  last decade.  Late spring freezes were
associated with at  least a few  sampling locations during nine of
the ten years.  The  freeze event of largest spatial extent occurred
in 1988 and  impacted  8% of the region.  Late spring freezes and
unfavorably cool growing conditions throughout the year (small GDD
totals) were not clearly associated.  The most widespread GDD event
was reported in 1982  and affected 16%  of  the New England region.
The most  extensive  late spring  snowfall event of  the last decade
occurred  in  1990  and  impacted 20% of New  England.  Thus, for the
decade of the  1980s,  at the level of stress represented by a 20
year return period, the largest scale events (spatially) were late
spring snowfall and low GDD totals.

     Next, this stress information is related to the  NEFHM program
sampling network.    Figure 32 shows the distribution  of the number
of event  "intersections" with NEFHM sampling hexagons  over  the
decade.  A hexagon intersection is said to occur when  a disturbance
event is identified in the climatological record associated with a
particular NEFHM sampling hexagon.  The  maximum possible number of
intersections for each hexagon is 40  (drought, freeze, snow and GDD
for each of ten years).  The areas of interest are the "tails" of
the distribution.   Hexagons counts located at the  lower tail (zero
intersections)    represent   areas   experiencing    few   climate
disturbances (as  defined by our  four events  and 20-year return
period).   Using the  earlier conceptual description of  climate-
ecosystem interactions, these are areas that might be expected to
persist or show slow or little change.   Dramatic changes in forest
status  or health  in  these  areas  are likely   associated  with
something other than  the climatological stresses  examined here.
                                74

-------
 Figure 32.  Distribution of hexagon and  climate event
             intersections,  1981-1990.
        >-
        O
        ID
        O
        LU
        cr.
             100
             80 -
             60 -
40  -
             20 -
               00   123456789

                          INTERSECTIONS
     Hexagons  in the  upper tail  represent areas  subject to  a
relatively  larger  number  of  stresses.    Evidence  of  ecosystem
response  to these  factors  could  take  the form of  changes  in
ecosystem structure or  characteristics or changes in overall system
health (resistance to pest and disease injury).  The present stress
analysis, however, is not complete.  Disturbance persistence should
be  included as well.   Under the  present  system,  a region  that
experiences stresses that are  few  in  number but persistent would
not  be  highlighted.   The  estimation  of drought  persistence  is
straightforward and has been demonstrated in the background study.
Late spring freeze persistence could also be easily  defined.   The
development of a definition  of  persistence for GDD and late spring
snowfall is more difficult.

     Figure 33  contains  the location of hexagons reporting  4  or
more event  intersections.  This is equivalent to the upper 3%  of
the frequency distribution shown in Figure  32.  Five  cooperative

                               75

-------
weather network  stations  define the three  intersection areas of
Figure 33.  Three of these five stations define the Massachusetts
area, indicating  this  is  likely to be  a  climatologically active
region.   Further investigation shows the Vermont area becomes more
firmly defined when the next  lower intersection frequency category
is  added  to  the  map.   Alternatively,  the  third area  which is
located in New Hampshire remains poorly defined, even when hexagons
with  lower intersection  frequencies  are added.   This suggests
"noisy"  weather data or local-scale phenomena rather than a pattern
of regionally important climatological disturbances.
                               76

-------
Figure  33    T
        JJ-   Locati
                                       O O 0  O
                                      O 0 O O  O
                                    O  O O O  O <>
                                   O  O O O O  O
                                  O O  O O O  O I
                                 O O  O O O O  O
                                  O O  O O O  O
                               ooooooooo,
                             OOOOOOO.OO
                            oooooooooo
                             0000000000^
                            OOOOOO/OOO O^J^/
                         77

-------
III.C.3.  Summary

     The results of the 1981-1990 analysis suggest that this was a
relatively quiet period with no significant mesoscale disturbances
(tropical cyclones),  few tornadoes  and only  small scale  (area)
disturbances  throughout the  region.   By  way of  comparison,  a
similar regional hexagon analysis was performed for the decade of
the 1960's.   This is a period  of particular interest because high
elevation red spruce decline is suggested to have been triggered by
a combination of climate  and pollution stresses during this time
(Johnson  et  al.,   1988).    Figure  34  contains  the  same  data
presentation as Figure 30.   It  is immediately apparent that this is
a more active climatological period.  Three consecutive large scale
drought years dominate  the figure  from  1964  into  1966.    Late
snowfall events also are more  frequent  and impact a  larger area
than  during the  1980's.    Nearly one-third of New England  was
impacted by a late  spring freeze in 1961 and 20% was  impacted in
1969.  GDD  totals do not  appear to be of major importance  in the
1960's. Figure  35  contains the distribution  of hexagon/climate
stress intersections.   Hexagons with  four or more intersections
represent 31% of the 1961-1970 sample as compared  to  3% of 1981-
1990  hexagons.   The bulk  of these  sites  is concentrated  in the
Northern three New England  states  (Figure  36).
Figure 34.  Percentage of New  England region impacted by climate
            stress, 1961-1970.
         100
         80
         60
      CJ>
      C£
      LU
      Q_  40
         20
            I . I freeze
            [//A gdd
            Vr^4 snow
            ^1 drought
                            Jk
	n
n
               1961  1962  1963 1964  1965 1966  1967  1968 1969  1970

                                  YEAR
                                78

-------
Figure 35.  Distribution of hexagon and climate event
           intersections, 1961-1970.
     CJ
     z
     LJ
     LJ
     LT
          100
                 0   12345678


                      INTERSECTIONS
                              79

-------
Figure 36.  Location of hexagons reporting four or more
            intersections with climate disturbances, 1961-1970.
                               80

-------
     Johnson et  al.  (1988)  attribute red spruce  declines in the
White, Green and Adirondack Mountains to a series of cold winters
in 1961, 1962 and 1963.  Although there is agreement that this is
a  likely  source  of decline  at  higher elevations,  there  is some
disagreement concerning the  interpretation  of tree-ring patterns
and mortality elsewhere (Van  Deusen et al.,  1991) .  The time series
in Figure  34  does suggest unusual winter conditions  in 1961 and
1963, but  also  indicates  that these  conditions were  followed by
severe drought and continued unfavorable winter conditions  in 1966,
1967 and 1969.  Johnson et al. (1988)  found conflicting evidence of
the  association   of  PDSI  with  ring width,  but drought as  an
additional source of stress cannot be entirely discounted.  Zahner
et  al.  (1989)  found PDSI  very  useful  in  evaluating  tree-ring
chronologies in conifers of the Southeast.

     Johnson et al. (1988) found close relationships between cold
early winters prior to the growing season and warm late summers of
the previous years to red spruce ring chronologies.   Such unusually
late warm conditions could easily be associated with the multiple
year  drought of  1964-1966.   As yet there  is no  physiological
explanation  for  these relationships  other  than perhaps  the new
shoot material doesn't harden-off properly when the  late summer is
too warm.   In the future,  if  tree-ring chronologies  are to be used
to  track  changes  in  disturbance regime  by  EMAP  and  the  NEFHM
program;  then an  index  of  -late  summer  temperatures   and  the
distribution of wintertime temperature minima  should  be added to
the stress climatology-

     Associative  studies  such as these  and  modeling  activities
linking climate and ecosystem behavior in the northeastern United
States  are  anticipated  in  the   future.   Recent  climate/forest
modeling activities are discussed in a special issue  of Agriculture
and Forest Meteorology.   The April,  1990 issue is devoted to the
Second Uppsala workshop  on Modeling  Forest  growth  Processes.   A
meeting summary and review is presented by Perttu (1990).

     Examples  of forest  modeling  and associative studies  for
climate change applications are discussed in  Solomon et al.(1984),
Pastor  and Post  (1988),  Joyce  et  al.   (1990),  Overpeck  et al.
(1990), Fritts and  Swetnam  (1989)  and  IPCC  (1990).   Although a
relatively large body of research literature exists, the need for
more basic and applications research is identified by both  the IGBP
and the U.S.  Department of Agriculture Forest Service (IGBP, 1990;
USDA Forest Service, 1990).
                                81

-------
III.D.  Most Recent Year  (1990)

     Summaries of climatological conditions in the most recent past
are  primarily  used to  aid  in the interpretation  of the current
year's sampling program.  An example is found in Brooks et al.  (c,
in  press).    These products  and  analyses,  in  combination with
supplemental   field  observations,   can  be   useful   for  the
identification  of areas  in  need of special  studies to identify
unknown sources of stress or mortality.  Table  10 indicates those
disturbance regime characteristics summarized for the roost recent
sample collection period  (1990).   With the exception of wind and
tropical   cyclone  events,   all  identified   disturbances  are
characterized for 1990  in terms of their frequency, magnitude and
size.
Table  10.  Elements of a 1990 New England disturbance regime
            climatology.
CLIMATE VARIABLE
Tornadoes
Wind
Tropical Cyclone
Drought
Temperature
Precipitation
Growing Degree
Days
Late Spring
Freeze
Late spring
Snowfall
FREQUENCY
X
X
none reported
X
X
X
X
X
X
MAGNITUDE
X

none reported
X
X
X
X
X
X
SIZE
X

none reported
X
X
X
X
X
X
III.D.I.  October 1989 through September 1990 Weather

     Record warmth  was reported during November  1990.   This was
followed by a blizzard with sustained  hurricane  force winds and
gusts of 45 ms"1 in Maine  during November.  Winter weather impacted
Maine again during  December, when the  worst blizzard since 1987
struck the Presque Isle area. Many Vermont  stations reported "the
coldest December on record."  Ice accumulations of from 1.27 cm to
1.9 cm  on  trees and powerlines  in Connecticut and Massachusetts
made a February ice storm the most serious  since 1984.
                                82

-------
     Severe  weather was  reported  in  May  and June.    Two  weak
tornadoes were  reported  in  Massachusetts during  May-    A small
tornado,  three  funnel  clouds  and  15  damaging wind  events  were
reported during June.  Flooding was reported in New Hampshire and
Vermont throughout July and August.  The heaviest 24-hour rainfall
in 50 years was reported in Massachusetts during August.


III.D.2.  Historical Comparison

     There were fewer  than average  tornadoes  during 1990.  Those
that were reported occurred earlier  in  the summer than usual.  The
spring  and   summer  wind  events  were  in  keeping  with  the  past
climatology of the area, but the large number of reports associated
with a September storm  outbreak was unusual.  Peak wind gusts of 45
ms'1 in November, over 34 ms'1 in June and over 31 ms~'  in August were
unusually strong.    Figures 37-39  illustrate  1990  departures from
average temperature and precipitation conditions.  Figure 30 tells
us that GDD, last spring frosts date and PDSI  conditions were not
unusual over a significant portion of New England during 1990.

     Mean annual 1990 New England temperatures follow the typical
south  to north gradient  evident  in  the  long-term area record
(Brooks  et   al,   c,  in  press).    Slightly   cooler than  normal
conditions prevailed in southern  Vermont  and  southeastern Maine,
with slightly warmer than average  conditions  elsewhere.   Annual
maximum temperatures were near, or  slightly cooler than, the 30-
year average (Figure 37).   Annual minimum temperatures were below
the 30-year  average  for much of Maine  and near to slightly above
average for the remainder of New England (Figure 38).  This is in
keeping with the  unusually cold  winter conditions noted  in the
weather summary.

     An irregular  pattern  of precipitation was reported across New
England  during  1990.   With  the  exception  of north-central and
southern  coastal  Maine, the region reported  near-normal  or wet
conditions.   Some  areas reported 25.4 to 38.1  cm of  rain  in excess
of their average annual totals (Figure 39).

     Figure  30  indicates  a fairly  large  portion  of  New England
experienced  a late  season  (spring)  snowfall event  in 1990.  This
event occurred on  May 22 and 23 and was  centered in northern Maine.
A few stations in  Vermont  and New  Hampshire were impacted as well.
Frozen precipitation associated with this storm tended to be light,
with  the  exception   of   Squapan  Dam,   Maine,   which  reported
accumulations of 5 cm.
                                83

-------
Figure 37.   1990 annual maximum temperature departure from 30-year
             average conditions.
                                             DEGREES CENTIGRADE
                                             ^m -6.0 to  -3.0
                                                 -3.0 to   0.0
                                                  0.0 to   3.0
                                                  3.0 to   6.0
                                 84

-------
Figure 38
1990 annual ,ini». temperature departure fro* 30-year
average conditions.
                                                  DEGREES CENTIGRADE
                                                  j^ -g.O to -6.0
                                                       -6.0 to -3.0
                                                       -3.0 to   0.0
                                                        0.0 to  3.0
                                                        J.O to  6.0
                                       85

-------
Figure 39.   1990 annual  precipitation departure from 30-year
              average conditions.
                                                PRECIPITATION
                                                (in centimeters)
                                                    -30.0 to -15.0
                                                    -15.0 to  0.0
                                                      0.0 to  15.0
                                                     15.0 to  30.0
                                                     30.0 to  45.0
                                    86

-------
III.D.  Summary and Comparison with Monitored Data

     With only  a few local  exceptions,  1990 brought  to  a quiet
close a notably uneventful disturbance decade.  The negative trend
in  severe weather and tropical  storm  activity discussed  in the
decade  summary  continued through  1990.   No  significant  drought
stress was noted.  Conditions generally favorable to forest growth
prevailed as is borne  out  by Brooks et al.  (c,  in press) .  Isolated
cases of winter freeze damage were  reported, but no locations were
given.  This could coincide with extremely cold winter conditions
reported in Maine and Vermont.

     Brooks et al. (c, in  press) note an area of moderate to severe
crown dieback in Maine cedars, particularly in Aroostook County. No
explanation was immediately available. Although many other factors
could be involved, a cursory check of weather records for that area
suggests three  possibilities.   First, the  Presgue Isle  area of
Aroostook County  reported record 24-hour  snowfall  in  December of
1989  (76  cm)  accompanied by  sustained winds of 13 ms"1 and peak
gusts  of  21 ms"1.   Although  evergreens in  this region are well
adapted to such events, the early December blizzard was extreme by
any standard.

     Second, Figure 30 indicates an  unusual late  spring snowfall
event  during  1990.    Further  investigation  shows that the event
centered on Aroostook County.  The county is represented by three
precipitation  stations,   Caribou,   Fort  Kent and  Sguapan  Dam.
Temperature conditions were warm enough to suggest this was a warm
snow event.   Records  for  Caribou and Fort  Kent  indicate this was
snow mixed with rain,  but frozen precipitation accounted for only
a  trace of  that recorded  and there was  no snow  accumulation.
Squapan Dam, on the other  hand, reported 5 cm of accumulated frozen
precipitation from this storm which  lasted  from May  22 to 23 and
produced a total water equivalent (rain and  melted snow or ice) of
3.1  cm.    Figure  40  illustrates  the   locations  of  hexagons
represented by the Squapan Dam observation.

      Finally, a severe storm  passed through the area during August
of  1990 with  winds in excess  of 26  ms"1.   This event  would be a
factor only if sampling in this area was  done late in the summer.
Since more  detailed information  concerning  the  location of crown
damage within the county  is unavailable at this time,  these three
sources of  forest disturbance are  only suggestions  and cannot be
directly associated with  the  sample observations.
                                87

-------
Figure 40.  Potential forest sampling hexagons represented by
            precipitation recorded at Squapan Dam, Maine.
                                   O  O  O  O  • •
                                  o  e>  o  o  o o o
                                   o  o  o  o o o
                                     ooooooo
                                    ooooooo
                              oooooooooo
                                  ooooo
                 ooooo/o
                            olo  o  o  o o o
                               ooooo
                000(0000
                o  o  o  o o o o
                o  o o o o o o
                     OOOOO
                               88

-------
IV.  Report Summary and Future Work


     Forest response research has established that climate plays an
important role in forest ecosystems, influencing both persistence
and  recurrence  characteristics  of  the  landscape   (Chapter  I) .
Forests  act as  environmental integrators  of  both natural  and
anthropogenic  disturbances. New  monitoring programs such  as  EPA
EMAP and the USDA FHM  program  hope  to  capture forest response to
changes  in  these   stresses,  but  their  observations  cannot  be
correctly interpreted without an ability to discern between natural
climate variability  and signals of permanent climatological change.
Likewise, changes in ecosystem health and productivity can not be
accurately  attributed  to changes in societal  behavior  unless  the
ecosystem response to natural disturbance  can be better understood
and predictively modeled.

     Pickett and White (1985)  propose the foundation for a theory
of  natural  disturbance.    One  conclusion is  that,  "in order  to
develop a theory of disturbance composed of unambiguous,  testable
hypotheses and capable  of making sound mechanistic predictions,  the
relevant variables  of disturbance  must  be  established.    These
include  at  least  magnitude,   frequency,  size  and  dispersion."
Existing climatological products that are designed to appeal to a
general  audience provide  valuable  background information.   If,
however, we are  to  correctly  interpret and  model forest/climate
interactions as proposed by Pickett and White, we must be certain
to  focus on the  most pertinent aspects  of the environment.  This
includes making sure that researchers are provided with the climate
conditions  being  integrated   by and   inducing   changes   in  the
communities under study (Chapter II).

     This  research   addresses  several  critical  climate  impact
issues.  First, while existing  historical  networks may be adequate
for landscape  or regional analyses, local  geographic  influences
critical to the development of accurate predictive models (a stated
goal  of  the  FHM)   may  be  lost  or  misinterpreted  by  using
nonrepresentative climate observations.  Ecosystem monitoring and
modeling   programs   that   anticipate   the   availability   of
climatological observations suitable for  assessment and research
applications may be  disappointed  by  reality.  The availability and
characteristics of climatological data and information pertinent to
the research issue to be addressed should figure prominently in the
early stages of any  ecological monitoring program. Too  often it is
included as an afterthought.  With many  of today's critical issues
focusing  on  the presence,  absence,   change  and  detection  of
climatological and anthropogenic  influences on the biosphere, this
oversight could be very costly in terms of knowledge lost as well
as dollars expended.

     Next,   although there are  usually  far more   climate  data
available for analysis  than for ecosystem  status and health, there

                               89

-------
are serious quality control and representation problems.   Some  of
these  issues are  currently being  addressed by  the atmospheric
science   community,   but   true,   uniform   quality   control   of
cooperatively observed  weather conditions  is  a  formidable task.
The ecological research community must be made as  aware as possible
of particularly risky areas.  Alternatives should  be provided where
possible.

     Finally, new  data analysis  technologies  such  as  CIS offer
unique opportunities  to integrate  previously  intractable multi-
media  research  issues.    With increased  flexibility  comes  new
challenges-to research problem definition.   One issue illustrated
in this  research is  the  problem of graphically  representing  an
inherently  temporal  process  (climate\forest  interactions  and
dynamics) in a spatial setting  (regional analysis).  The discussion
of data biases and weighting scheme error illustrates  that the best
solution to these problems is yet to be determined.

     Remotely  sensed and  new  ground-based monitoring  programs
increase  analysis  opportunities.   For  example,  Quattrochi  and
Pelletier (1991) suggest that remote sensing technology can  be used
to detect and record  successional or cyclical ecosystemic  changes
in response to  disturbance, to identify the location and  spatial
extent of stress response or disturbance events and  to estimate the
magnitude of disturbance and level of stress response.  To  realize
this potential, there is first the need to establish the new data
in the assessment process.  Even if remotely sensed data provides
improved characterization  of  spatial  and temporal  variability of
the  climate,   comparative  relationships between  historic  data
sources  and  new sources  must be  established  before  they  are
routinely incorporated into ecological assessment products.

     Pickett and White conclude that the development of disturbance
theory requires an explicit statement of  the parameters of  systems
that can respond to disturbance.  Predictions must be  made in terms
of the variables of disturbance and the response parameters.  The
research summarized here represents a first  step in this process,
i.e.,   the presentation  of the  magnitude,  frequency,  size  and
dispersion of known climate disturbance phenomena.    The next step
is to explicitly link observations  of  forest status  and behavior
with the unified climatological disturbance  data base to identify
and more  precisely  define forest response  parameters.   This has
been done in a cursory fashion in Chapter III, but a long  process
of research,  integration and application remains before the  role  of
climate/forest  interactions  in the overall earth system  can  be
fully understood and  predicted.

     This point  is  illustrated by Appendix  A, which contains  an
outline of research opportunities suggested  by this report.  They
are not  ranked  but  have  been  stratified  into  four categories.
These areas represent: (1)  the development of new climate analyses
(climatologies),  (2)  fundamental  program  design  issues,   (3)

                                90

-------
acquisition of new data, and (4)  applied climatological research.
This report  illustrates the volume of research  and applications
studies that can be applied to operational monitoring programs such
as EMAP and FHM.  Appendix  A suggests there  is  far more that can
and should be done to expand the use and value of climate data and
information to these programs.
                               91

-------
V.  References

Aber, J.D.,  K.J.  Nadelhoffer, P-  Steudler and J.M. Melillo,  1989.
      "Nitrogen   Saturation   in  Northern   Forest   Ecosystems."
      BioSciencer  39(6):  378-386.

Adams, M.B.  and C.  Eager (eds.),  1989.  Air Pollution and Winter
      Injury  of  Red  Spruce, Proceedings of a workshop  sponsored by
      the  Spruce-Fir  Research Cooperative,  Edinburgh,   Scotland,
      April  17-18,  1989, Northeastern  Forest Experiment  Station,
      Amherst, MA.

Alley,  W.M.,   1984.     "The   Palmer   Drought  Severity  Index:
      Limitations and Assumptions."  Journal of  Climate and Applied
      Meteorology, 23:   1100-1109.

AMS   Council,  UCAR  Board  of  Trustees,   1988.    "The   changing
      atmosphere - challenges and  opportunities."  Bulletin of the
      American Meteorological Society.  69: 1434-1440.

Auerback, S.I., 1981.  "Ecosystem Response to Stress:  A  Review of
      Concepts  and Approaches."   Chapter  3 in  Stress Effects on
      Natural Ecosystems. G.W.  Barrett and R. Rosenberg  (eds.), John
      Wiley & Sons, Chichester.  pp 29-41.

Baker, W.E.,  1991.    "Wind  Measurements Expected with  the Laser
      Atmospheric Wind Sounder."  Preprints of the Seventh  Symposium
      on Meteorological  Observations and Instrumentation. American
      Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.  pp 169-174.

Barrett, G.W.,  1981.  "Stress Ecology:  An Integrative Approach."
      Chapter  1  in  Stress  Effects on Natural  Ecosystems.  G.W.
      Barrett  and   R.   Rosenberg   (eds.),   John  Wiley  &  Sons,
      Chichester.  pg  4.

Barrett, G.W. and R.  Rosenberg,  1981.   Stress  Effects on Natural
      Ecosystems.  John  Wiley & Sons, Chichester.  305pp.

Bazzaz,  F.A., 1983.  "Characteristics of Populations in Relation to
      Disturbance in Natural and Man-Modified Ecosystems." Chapter
      5.4 in  Disturbance and  Ecosystems;   Components of  Response.
     H.A. Mooney  and M. Godron  (eds.),  Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
     pp259-275.

Bormann, F.H. and G.E. Likens, 1979.  "Catastrophic Disturbance and
     the Steady State  in Northern Hardwood Forests."   American
     Scientist. 67: 660-669.

Botkin,  D.B.,  1980.   "A Grandfather  Clock down  the Staircase:
     Stability and Disturbance in  Natural  Ecosystems." In Forests.
     Fresh Perspectives from Ecosystem Analysis. R.H. Waring (ed.),
     Oregon State University Press, Corvallis,  pp 1-10.

                                92

-------
Botkin, D.B., J.F. Janak and J.R. Wallis, 1972.  "Some ecological
     consequences of a computer model of forest growth."  Journal
     of Ecology. 60:948-972.

Brooks, R.T.,  M. Miller-Weeks  and W. Burkman,  in press  a.  New
     England  Forest  Health Monitoring  Program:    1990 Executive
     Summary-  USDA Forest  Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment
     Station, Radnor, PA.

Brooks, R.T., D. Dickson, W. Burkman,  I. Millers, M. Miller-Weeks,
     E. Cooter and L. Smith, in press c.   New England Forest Health
     Monitoring Program:  1990 Annual  Report.  USDA Forest Service
     Northeastern Forest Experiment Station,  Radnor,  PA.

Brooks, R.T., T. Frieswyk,  D.  Griffith, E. Cooter and L. Smith, in
     press b.  New England  Forests:  A Baseline for the New England
     Forest  Health  Monitoring  Program.    USDA  Forest  Service
     Northeastern Forest Experiment Station,  Radnor,  PA.

Canham, C.D. and O.L. Loucks, 1984.  "Catastrophic Windthrow in the
     Presettlement Forests of  Wisconsin."  Ecology. 65(3):803-809.

Cooter, E.J., 1982.  An Oklahoma Soil Moisture  Climatology.  Volume
     6 of Operational Weather Modification, Oklahoma Climatological
     Survey, Norman, Oklahoma, 184 pp.

Eder,  B.K.,  J.M.  Davis and  J.F.  Monahan,  1987.    "Spatial  and
     Temporal Analysis  of  the  Palmer  Drought  Severity Index over
     the South-Eastern  United States."  Journal  of  Climatology,
     7:31-56.

Emanuel, K.A.,   1988.    "The  Maximum  Intensity of  Hurricanes."
     Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 45(7):1143-1155.

Emanuel, K.A.,  1987.   "The dependence of hurricane  intensity on
     climate."  Nature. 326:483-485.

Ferris, C., 1980.  "The Forest System."   Volume 2, Chapter 9 of An
     Ecological Characterization of Coastal Maine (North and East
     of Cape Elizabeth),  S.  I. Fefer  and  P.A.  Schettig,  eds.,
     Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Northeast
     Region publication, FWS/OBS-80/29,  Newton Corner,  MA.  39 pp.

Forman, R.T.T.,  and M. Godron,  1986.   Landscape  Ecology.   John
     Wiley and Sons, New York.  619pp.

Franklin,  J.F., H.H.  Shugart and M.E. Harmon,  1987.  "Tree Death as
     an Ecological Process."  BioScience. 37(8): 550-556.
                                93

-------
Fritts, H.C. and T.W.  Swetnam,  1989.   "Dendroecology:  A  Tool  for
     Evaluating   Variations    in   Past   and   Present    Forest
     Environments."  In Advances in Ecological Research, Volume  19,
     M.  Begon,  A.H. Fitter,  E.D.  Ford and  A.  MacFadyen  (eds.),
     Academic Press, London,  pp 111-188.

Fujita, T.T., 1978.  Manual of downburst identification. Satellite
     and Mesometeorology Research Project Research Paper  No. 156,
     The University of  Chicago,  Chicago, Illinois.

Fujita, T.T., 1989.  "Mesoscale  Classifications:  Their History  and
     Their  Application to Forecasting."   Chapter  2  of Mesoscale
     Meteorology  and   Forecasting.   P.S.   Ray  (ed.),   American
     Meteorological Society, Boston.   ppl8-35.

Fujita, T.T., 1981.   "Tornadoes and Downbursts in the Context of
     Generalized Planetary  Scales."   Journal  of the  Atmospheric
     Sciences. 38(8):1511-1534.

Gagne,  J.A.,  Coulson,   R.N.,  Foltz,  J.L.,  Wagner, T.L.  and L.J.
     Edson,  L.J.,  1980.   "Attack  and Survival  of  Dendroctonus
     frontalis in relation to weather during three years in east
     Texas."   Environmental Entomology. 9:22-29.

Gedzelman,  S.D.  and   E.  Lewis,  1990.     "Warm  Snowstorms,  a
     forecaster's Dilemma".  Weatherwise. 43(5):  265-270.

Gerardi, M.H. and J.K.  Grimm, 1979.  The History. Biology.  Damage
     and  Control of  the  Gypsy Moth   Porthetria  Dispar  (L.).
     Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Rutherford,  pp  101-103.

Gleick, J., 1987.  Chaos.  Viking Press, NY.  352pp.

Godron, M.  and R.T.T.  Forman,  1983.    "Landscape Modification  and
     Changing  Ecological  Characteristics."    Chapter  2.1  of
     Disturbance and  Ecosystems:   Components  of  Response. H.A.
     Mooney and M.  Godron (eds.), Springer-Verlag,  Berlin,  pp  12-
     28.

Gosselink, J.G.,  L.C. Lee and T.A. Muir, 1990.  "The Regulation  and
     Management   of    Bottomland   Hardwood    Forest   Wetlands:
     Implications of the EPA-Sponsored Workshops."   Chapter 19 in
     Ecological Processes and Cumulative Impacts:  Illustrated by
     Bottomland Hardwood Wetland Ecosystems. J.G. Gosselink, L.C.
     Lee and T.A. Muir, eds.,  Lewis Publishers,  Chelsea, Michigan.
     p 646.

Graham, R.L., M.G. Turner and  V.H. Dale, 1990.   "How Increasing C02
     and Climate Change Affect  Forests."  BioScience.  40(8): 575-
     587.
                                94

-------
Hayden,  B.P.,  1981.    "Secular  Variation  in  Atlantic  Coast
     Extratropical Cyclones. " Monthly Weather Review. 109:159-167.

Henry, J.D.  and Swan, J.M.A., 1974.  "Reconstructing forest history
     from live and dead plant material - an approach to the study
     of forest succession  in southwest New  Hampshire."   Ecology
     55:772-783.

Holland,  M.M.,  1988.    "SCOPE/MAB technical  consultations  on
     landscape  boundaries:    report of a  SCOPE/MAB workshop on
     ecotones."  Biology International. Special Issue, 17: 47-106.

Hunsaker,  C.T.  and  D.E.  Carpenter  (eds.),  1990.    Ecological
     Indicators  for  the Environmental Monitoring  and  Assessment
     Program.  USEPA/AREAL, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Huschke,  R.E.   (ed.),  1989.    Glossary  of Meteorology.  American
     Meteorological Society, Boston.  638pp.

Idso,  S.B.,  R.C.  Balling,  Jr., and R.S. Cerveny,  1990.   "Carbon
     Dioxide and Hurricanes:   Implications of Northern Hemispheric
     Warming  for Atlantic/Caribbean  Storms."   Meteorology  and
     Atmospheric Physics. 42: 259-263.

International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme,  1990. IGBP: A Study of
     Global Change. Report no. 12, pp 6.1-1 to 6.1-30.

Jeffers, J.N., 1988.   "Statistical and Mathematical Approaches to
     Issues of Scales in Ecology-"  Chapter 4 in Scales and Global
     Change:   Spatial  and  Temporal  Variability in Biospheric and
     Geospheric Processes. T.  Rosswall, R.G.  Woodmansee  and P.G.
     Risser  (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.  pg 54.

Johnson, A.H., E.R. Cook, and T.G. Siccama,  1988.   "Climate and red
     spruce growth and decline in the northern Appalachians."  In
     Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 85: 5369-
     5373.

Jones, D.A.  and Kiniry,  J.R., 1986.  CERES-Maize;   A Simulation
     Model of Maize Growth and Development.  Texas A&M University
     Press,  College Station, TX.   194pp.

Karl, T.R. and R.G. Quayle,  1988.  "Climate Change in Fact and in
     Theory:  Are we Collecting the Facts?"  Climatic Change. 13:
     5-17.

Karl,  T.R. ,  L.K.  Metcalf,  M.L. Nicodemus and  R.G.  Quayle,  1983.
     Statewide  Average  Climatic History.  Historical Climatology
     Series No. 6-1,  NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC.
                                95

-------
Karl, T.R. and C.N. Williams Jr.,  1987.   "An Approach to Adjusting
     Climatological Time Series for Discontinuous Inhomogeneities. "
     Journal of Climate  and Applied Meteorology. 1744-1763.

Karl,  T.R.,  1983.   "Some  Spatial  Characteristics   of  Drought
     Duration  in  the  United States."    Journal  of  Climate and
     Applied Meteorology. 22:  1356-1366.

Kozlowski, T.T., 1985.   "Tree Growth  in Response to Environmental
     Stresses."  J. of Arboriculture. 11(4):97-lll.

Michaels,  P.J.  and  B.P. Hayden,  1987.    "Modeling  the  Climate
     Dynamics of Tree Death." BioScience.  37(8):603-610.

Michaels,   P.J.,   P.J.   Stenger,  and   D.E.   Sappington,   1986.
     "Modelling  changes  in the  epidemic range of  Southern Pine
     Beetle  using temperature  and objective  moisture indices."
     Theoretical and Applied Climatology.  37:   39-50.

National Weather Service, 1989.   Cooperative Station Observations.
     National Weather Service Observing Handbook No. 2, U.S. GPO,
     Washington, D.C.  83 pp.

Neumann,  C.J.,  B.R.  Jarvinen,  A.C.   Pike,  and J.D.  Elms,   1990.
     Tropical Cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean. 1871-1986  (with
     storm  track  maps updated through  1989),   NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC,
     Asheville, NC.  186 pp.

Norton, D.J. and Slonecker, E.T., 1990.  The Ecological Geography
     of EMAP-  Geolnfo Systems. 1:32-45.

Nuttonson, M.Y., 1955. Wheat-Climate Relationships and the Use of
     Phenology  in  Ascertaining  the Thermal   and  Photo-Thermal
     Requirements  of Wheat.   American Institute of Crop Ecology,
     Washington, D.C.

Overpeck, J.T., D. Rind  and R.  Goldberg,  1990.  "Climate Induced
     Changes  in  Forest  Disturbance  and  Vegetation."   Nature.
     343(4):51-53.

Palmer,  W.C.,   1965.   Meteorological Drought.   Weather Bureau
     Research Paper No.  45.  Washington, D.C.   58 pp.

Peer, R.L., 1990.   "An Overview  of Climate Information Needs for
     Ecological  Effects Models."     Contract  No.   68-02-4288,
     USEPA/ORD/AREAL, Research Triangle Park, NC.  52  pp.

Pickett,  S.T.A.  and White,  P.S.   (eds.),  1985.  The  Ecology of
     Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press,  Inc.,
     Orlando, 472 pp.
                                96

-------
Puckett, L.J., 1981.  Dendroclimatic estimates of a drought index
     for northern  Virginia.  U.S. Geological  Survey Water-Supply
     Paper 2080.  39 pp.

Quattrochi, D.A. and  R.E.  Pelletier,  1991.   "Remote  Sensing for
     Analysis  of  Landscapes:   An Introduction."   Chapter  3  of
     Quantitative Methods  in Landscape Ecology, M.G.  Turner and
     R.H. Gardner (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York.  pp 51-76.

Reiners,  W.A.,  1983.    "Disturbance  and  Basic  Properties  of
     Ecosystem  Energetics."    Chapter  3.3   in  Disturbance  and
     Ecosystems:   Components of  Response,    H.A.  Mooney  and  M.
     Godron (eds.), Springer-Verlag,  Berlin.   pp 83-98.

Robinson, D.A., 1988.   "Construction of a United States Historical
     Snow  Data  Base."   In  Proceedings  of the  1988 Eastern Snow
     Conference.  pp 50-59.

Rosswall, T.,  R.G. Woodmansee and P.G.  Risser  (eds.), 1988.  Scales
     and  Global Change:    Spatial  and Temporal Variability  in
     Biospheric and Geospheric Processes.  SCOPE  (series) 35, John
     Wiley & Sons,  Chichester.  355 pp.

Runkle, J.R.,  1985. Disturbance Regimes in Temperate Forests.  In
     The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. S.T.A.
     Pickett and P.S.  White (eds.), Academic Press, Inc., Orlando,
     pp 17-33.

Sadowski,  A.,  1975.    Bulletin  concerning Technical  Procedures
     Bulletin No. 130:CROP MOISTURE INDEX.   NOAA/NWS  bulletin to
     recipients   of   technical   procedures   bulletin   series
     (mimeographed).

Shugart, H.H., 1984.   A Theory of  Forest Dynamics:  The Ecological
     Implications of  Forest  Succession  Models.   Springer-Verlag,
     New York.  278pp.

Shugart, H.H., P.J. Michaels, T.M. Smith,  D.A. Weinstein and E.B.
     Rastetter, 1988.   "Simulation Models of  Forest Succession."
     Chapter .8 in Scales and Global Change:  Spatial and Temporal
     Variability   in   Biospheric  and   Geospheric   Processes.
     R.Rosswall, R.G.  Woodmansee and P.G.  Risser, eds., John Wiley
     & Sons,  Chichester.  pp!25-152.

Smith,  W.H.,  1990.   "The Health  of North American Forests:  Stress
     and Risk Assessment."  Journal of Forestryf 88: 32-35.
                                97

-------
Solomon, A.M.,  M.L.  Tharp,  D.C.  West,  G.E. Taylor, J.W. Webb  and
     J.L. Trimble, 1984.   "Response  of  Unmanaged Forests to C02  -
     Induced Climate Change:  Available  Information,  Initial Tests
     and Data Requirements."  Prepared for DOE under  Contract,  No.
     W-7405-ENG-26,  DOE/NBB-0053,  Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
     Oak Ridge  TN.   93 pp.

Stephens, G.R., 1981.   Defoliation  and mortality in Connecticut
     Forests.    Bull.  796,  Connecticut  Agricultural  Experiment
     Station, New Haven.  13pp.

United  States  Department of  Commerce,  1991.      "Storm   Data",
     USDOC/NOAA/NCDC,  National Climatic  Data Center,  Asheville,
     North Carolina.

United States Department  of  Agriculture Forest Service, no  date.
     "New England Forest  Health Monitoring Program:  Project Work
     Plan." Compiled by M. Miller-Weeks  and D.I.  Gagnon,  FPM, USDA
     Forest Service, Durham, NH.

Weinstein, D.A.  and  H.H.  Shugart,  1983.  "Ecological Modeling of
     Landscape   Dynamics."     Chapter  2.2  in  Disturbance  and
     Ecosystems:  Components of Response. H.A. Mooney and M.  Godron
     (eds.), Springer-Verlag,  Berlin.   pp29-45.

White,  P.S.  and S.T.A. Pickett, 1985.   "Natural Disturbance and
     Patch Dynamics:  An  Introduction."  Chapter 1 in The Ecology
     of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. S.T.A. Pickett and
     P.S. White  (eds.), Academic Press, Inc, Orlando.  pp3-9.

Wissmar, R.C. and F.J.  Swanson, 1990.  "Landscape Disturbances and
     Lotic Ecotones."  Chapter 5 in The Ecology and Management of
     Aquatic-Terrestrial  Ecotones.  R.J.  Naiman  and H.  Decamps
     (eds.),  Parthenon Publishing Group  Inc.,  Park Ridge, New
     Jersey.  pp 65-89.

Woodward, F.I.,  1987.  Climate and Plant Distribution.  Cambridge
     University Press, Cambridge.  174pp.

Zahner, R.,  Saucier,  J.R.  and Myers,  R.K.,  1989.  "Tree-ring model
     interprets growth decline in  natural stands of loblolly pine
     in  the  southeastern  United  States."   Canadian Journal  of
     Forest Research. 19:612-621.

Zonneveld,  I.S.  and R.T.T. Forman,  1990.  Changing Landscapes:  An
     Ecological Perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York.   281pp.
                                98

-------
                            APPENDIX A

                           FUTURE WORK
Additional Climatologies

1.   Ozone or  other  pollution episodes could,  over  time,  impact
     forest  growth and  productivity.    Ozone  climatologies  are
     needed  for  use  with pollution  indicator  species monitoring
     data.

2.   Climatologies of other temperature related disturbances:
          a.  heat waves (evaporative stress and heat shock)
          b.  frequency, intensity and duration of cold winter
              temperatures (winterkill  and tree-ring chronologies)
          c.  warm August temperatures (tree-ring chronologies)

3.   Climatologies of other precipitation variables:
          a.  Fall precipitation greater than or equal to 1.25 cm
               (correlated with growth)
          b.  Spring precipitation greater than or equal to 1.25 cm
               (correlated with growth)

4.   Statistical definition of drought  areas not necessarily based
     on  climate  divisions.   This would help to  target special
     forest  health  studies  and is  of  interest  to  tree-ring
     scientists.

5.   Climatology  of  wet-spell or flooding  events.   The extreme
     positive  end of the  PDSI scale  could  be considered  as an
     indicator of  wide-spread soil  saturation.   It  would  not be
     adequate for local or  short-term flooding  events.  If this is
     critical, alternative methods of  estimation  will need to be
     identified.

6.   Climatology  of  spring or  fall  freeze duration  (within  and
     between  24-hour  periods) and pre-freeze  conditions (winter
     hardiness).

7.   A  fire  weather  climatology.    Because  of the  influence of
     forest management,  this is a difficult issue,  but is critical
     for climate  trend/climate  change  assessment research.   Much
     work has been done  by  USDA Forest  Service  scientists already,
     so this  may only involve determining how best  to apply the
     information in an EMAP/FHM setting.

8.   Expansion of the  spring hard freeze and snowfall climatologies
     to late fall events.
                                99

-------
Program Design

1.   Investigation of the implications of the proximity of weather
     data for FHM data  analysis:  i.e.,   are the stations we have
     selected adequate in time and space? No comparison of climate
     site descriptors  to sample site descriptors  has  been made.
     Selection  criteria is based only on  distance from sampling
     site and quality of record.  If interpolation is needed, which
     methods are  the most appropriate?   This may vary  with the
     climate variable to be interpolated.

2.   Examination and resolution of any  differences  between EMAP
     monitoring and  climate CIS designs.

3.   Exploration of potential interactions  between climate and air
     pollution and deposition activities.
Database Development

1.   Extraction  from  data record of  "modeling" of  snow  and ice
     disturbance events.  A model is needed because of inaccuracies
     in  the snow/ice  record for most NWS  cooperative  observer
     locations.  Ice storms in particular can result in substantial
     areas of crown damage,  defoliation and mortality.

2.   Acquisition of digitized tropical cyclone paths.  Since these
     paths are remotely sensed,  this information may help to fill-
     in  severe storm  observations  in sparsely populated areas.
     Since the resolution of the paths is  known, error bars can be
     placed around the central path to establish potential impact
     area estimates.

3.   Calculation of PDSI by station.  Once this database has been
     developed,  it can be  manipulated  in  a  variety  of  ways,
     including support for  tree-ring chronology studies  and the
     spatial drought climatology described above.

4.   Acquisition of Canadian weather data to supplement data-sparse
     northern  border  areas.   This has been  started,  but  has not
     progressed very far.

5.   Acquisition  of  a  lightning  strike database.    Data  are
     available from networks operated  by Bureau  of Land Management
     (BLM),  National Severe  Storms Laboratory (NSSL) and the State
     University of New York at Albany  (SUNYA).

6.   Acquisition  of  the Robinson  quality  controlled  snowfall
     database from NCDC.  These data would be used to better define
     heavy  (wet)  snowfall   events  and   to  then  generate  more
     meaningful return period climatologies.

                               100

-------
Applied Research

1.   Investigate the application or  integration of remotely sensed
     weather  data to  quantitative  summaries  used by  landscape
     ecologists that also use remotely sensed land surface data.

2.   Explicitly examine the way  in which disturbance climatologies
     have  been used  and  may  be  used  in tree-ring  chronology
     studies.  This would be done specifically with trend detection
     and source analysis in mind.

3.   Develop and  complete  definition  of  disturbance phenomena in
     three-dimensional (3-D) space  (size, intensity and duration)
     for given disturbance frequencies.   For instance, what does a
     100 year  drought  look like in terms  of intensity,  size and
     impact area and duration (where area is defined by percent of
     total  area  involved)?    Perform   an  historical  study  to
     determine spatial and temporal variability of the 3-D space.
     Investigate  ways  of   detecting  trends or  changes  in  the
     character of the 3-D space.  Develop a  3-D time series such as
     Figure  30 summarizing  regional characteristics.   This study
     would  also  relate to spatial pattern  analysis of  drought
     described earlier.

4.   Explore the  use  of extreme value distributions  to estimate
     return periods beyond the cooperative (30-year) data record.
     This  has  been done  in the  literature  for temperature and
     precipitation variables, but  not necessarily  for  all  those
     identified as critical to forest health.

5.   Explore the  development  of interactive/multiple disturbance
     climatologies such as moisture stress and Southern Pine Beetle
     infestation and damage severity or similar relationships for
     Gypsy moth in the northeast.
                               101

-------
                            APPENDIX B
                 EMAP BIBLIOGRAPHIC RESOURCE LIST
                          compiled 11/90

Anderson,  Eric A.  NOAA-ARS  Cooperative  Snow  Research Project:
     Watershed Hvdroclimatology and Data for Water Years  1960-1974.
     Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977. *

Atlas of Monthly and Seasonal Temperature Departures from the Long-
     Term Mean (1895-1983) for the Contiguous United States: Fall.
     Asheville, NC:  NOAA National  Climatic  Data  Center, 1984.

Air Weather Service Climatic Briefs: North America. Scott Air Force
     Base,  IL:  Air Force  Environmental Technical  Applications
     Center, 1984.  *

Baron,  William R.   "Frost-free  Record  Reconstruction  for Eastern
     Massachusetts". Journal  of Climate and Applied Meteorology.
     23, no. 2  (Feb. 1984), 317-319. *

Baron,   William,    et   al.   Loner-time  Series   Temperature   and
     Precipitation   Records  of  Maine.   1808-1978.   Orono,   ME:
     University of  Maine at Orono,  1980.

Bates, R.E. Climate at  CRREL  (Cold  Regions Research & Engineering
     Laboratory) Hanover.  New  Hampshire. Hanover, NH: United States
     Army Corps of  Engineers,  Cold Regions Research and Engineering
     Lab, 1984. *

Bates, Roy E. Snow  Cover and  Meteroloqv at Allaqash. Maine. 1977-
     1980. Hanover, NH:  United States Army Corps of Engineers, Cold
     Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, 1983. *

Bates, Roy E. Winter Thermal Structure. Ice Conditions, and Climate
     of Lake Champlain. Hanover,  NH:  United States Army Corps of
     Engineers, Cold Regions  Research and Engineering Laboratory,
     1980. *

Bates, Roy E.  and  Brown,  Mary-Lynn. Lake Champlain Ice Formation
     and  Ice  Free  Dates  and  Predictions  from Meteorological
     Indicators.  Hanover,  NH:  United  States  Army  Corps  of
     Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab, 1979.*

Bilello, M.A.  Review of Snow Conditions  and Winter Climate Near
     Burlington and Underhill. Vermont.  Hanover, NH: United States
     Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering  Laboratory, 1980.*
                               102

-------
Bogart, Dean B. Floods of August  to  October 1955.  New England to
     North Carolina.  Washington: United States Government Printing
     Office, 1960.

Brumbach, Joseph J. The Climate of Connecticut, np. 1965. Series:
     State  Geological  and  Natural History  Survey  of Connecticut
     Bulletin 99.

Bulletin of the New England  Weather Service.  Boston,  Mass:  New
     England Weather Service,  1892-.

Burlington  IAP  VT.  Revised  Uniform  Summary  of Surface  Weather
     Observations. Parts A-F.  Scott Air Force Base, IL: Air Force
     Environmental Technical Applications Center,  1987. *

Brunswick Naval Air  Station.  Maine.  Revised Uniform  Summary of
     Surface Weather  Observations.  Parts A-F. Scott Airforce Base,
     IL: Air  Force Environmental  Technical  Applications  Center,
     1987.   *

Climatolocrical Data.  New England.  Asheville, NC:  National Oceanic
     and  Atmospheric  Administration.   Environmental   Data  and
     Information Service, National Climatic Center, 1979.

Dana, Terry and Easter, R.C. "Statistical Summary and Analyses of
     Event  Precipitation Chemistry From  the MAP3S  Network,  1976-
     1983." Atmospheric Environment.  21,  no. 1 (1987),  113-128. *

Dethier, Bernard  E.  The Climate  of  the  Northeast Precipitation
     Probabilities.  Ithaca,  NY:  New   York   State  College  of
     Agriculture,  1965.

Dow  Air Force Base.  Banqor.  Maine.   Revised Uniform  Summary of
     Surface Weather  Observations.  Parts A-F. Scott Airforce Base,
     IL: Air  Force Environmental  Technical  Applications  Center,
     1987.   *

Fay, Richard. New  England Coastal  Fog. New York, NY: United States
     Weather Bureau Eastern Region, 1967.

Federer, C.A.  Annual Cycles  of  Soil  and Water Temperatures at
     Hubbard Brook. Upper Darby, PA:  United  States Forest Service.
     Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1973.  *

Fobes,  Charles B.  Climatic Divisons of Maine. Orono, ME: University
     Press,  1946.

Fort  Devens  Army   Air  Field.   Massachusetts  Limited  Surface
     Observations  Climatic  Summary.  Parts  A-F.  Scott  Air Force
     Base,   IL:  Air  Force  Environmental Technical  Applications
     Center, 1985. *


                               103

-------
Glidden, D.E. "Great Windstorm of 2 April 1973  on  Cannon Mountain,
     New Hampshire." Weatherwise. 27, no. 4 (Aug.  1974), 156-161.*

Gosslee,   David  G.   Weekly  Precipitation  and  Temperature   in
     Connecticut, storrs, CT:  University of Connecticut, College of
     Agriculture  Experiment Station, 1961.

Govoni, John  W.  Comparison of Winter Climatic Data for Three  New
     Hampshire  Sites.  Hanover,  NH:  United States  Army Corps  of
     Engineers, Cold Regions Reasearch and Engineering  Laboratory,
     1986.

Gow, Anthony  J. and Govoni, John W.  Ice Growth on Post Pond  (NH) .
     1973-1982.    Hanover,   NH:  United   States  Army Corps   of
     engineers, Cold Regions  Research  and  Engineering  Laboratory,
     1983. *

Hamburg,  Steven  P.  et  al.  "Historical  Decline  of  Red Spruce
     Populations and Climatic Warming." Nature. 331,  No. 6155  (Feb.
     4, 1988),  428-431.  *

Hedin, Lars O. et al.  "Decrease in  Precipitation Acidity Resulting
     from  Decreasing  SO SUB  4 Super 2  Super-  Concentration."
     Nature.  325, no.  6101  (Jan. 15, 1987), 244-246.

Hunter, Bruce W. and Meade, Daniel B. Precipitation in Connecticut.
     1951-1980. Hartford, CT:  Natural Resources Center,  Connecticut
     Dept. of Environmental Protection,  1983.

Hurley, Charles W. "Recent Temperature and Snowfall  Trends."  News
     Bulletin (Mount Washington  Observatory, Gorham, NH), 10,  no.
     3  (Sept. 1969), 13-15. *

Impact of Tropical Storm  "Acmes"  on Chesapeake Bay. Vol.1.  Summary.
     Prepared by  Cheseapeake  Research Consortium Inc.  Baltimore,
     MD: United States Army Corps of Engineers,  Baltimore District,
     1975. (vol.  2 also  avail.)  *

 Karl,  Thomas  R.  Atlas  of  Monthly and  Seasonal  Precipitation
     Departures from Normal (1895-1985)  for the Contiguous United
     States  : Fall.  Asheville,  NC: NOAA  Natioanl  Climatic Data
     Center,  1985.

Karl, Thomas  R. and Knight,  Richard W. Atlas  of Monthly Palmer
     Hydroloaical Drought  Indices  (1895-1930)  for the Contiguous
     United States.  Asheville,  NC:  NOAA.  National  Climatic Data
     Center,  [1985].

Karl, Thomas  R. and Knight,  Richard W. Atlas  of Monthly Palmer
     Moisture Anomaly Indices  (1895-1930) for the Contiguous United
     States.  Asheville,  NC:   NOAA.  National Climatic Data Center,
     1985

                               104

-------
Karl, Thomas R. et al.  Probabilities and Precipitation Required to
     End/Ameliorate  Droughts.  Asheville,   NC:   NOAA.   National
     Climatic Data Center, 1986.

Karl, Thomas R.  Statewide Average Climatic History; Connecticut.
     1895-1982. Asheville, NC: NOAA. National Climatic Data Center,
     1983. *

Karl, Thomas R.  Statewide Average Climatic History: Maine. 1895-
     1982. Asheville,  NC: NOAA.  National Climatic  Data Center,
     1983. *

Karl, Thomas R. Statewide Average  Climatic History; Massachusetts.
     1895-1982. Asheville, NC: NOAA. National Climatic Data Center,
     1983. *

Karl, Thomas R. Statewide Average  Climatic History: New Hampshire.
     1895-1982. Asheville, NC: NOAA. National climatic Data Center,
     1983. *

Karl, Thomas R. Statewide Average  Climatic History: Vermont. 1895-
     1982. Asheville,  NC: NOAA.  NAtional Climatic  Data Center,
     1983. *

Krenz, Maria  E.  et al.  Institutional  Directory.  Climate-related
     Impacts Network.  Boulder,  CO: National Center for Atmospheric
     Research, Environmental and  Societal Impacts Group, 1989.

Landin, Michael  G.  and Bosart, Lance  F.  "Diurnal  Variability of
     Precipitation  in  the Northeastern  United States." Monthly
     Weather Review. 113, no. 6 (June 1985), 989-1014.  *

Lautzenheiser, Robert E. Climatological Summary; Greenville. Maine.
     Boston,  MA: National Weather  Service. Weather Service Office,
     1971. * (NOAA report no.71121615).

Lautzenheiser, Robert E. Climatological Summary:  Lewiston. Maine.
     Boston,  MA: National Weather  Service. Weather Service Office,
     1971. * (NOAA report no.71121616).

Lautzenheiser, Robert E. Snowfall. Snowfall Frequencies, and Snow
     Cover Data for New England. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Department
     of Commerce  , Environmental  Science Services Administration,
     Environmental Data Service,  1969.

Lee, Richard.  "Lattitude,  Elevation,  and  Mean Temperature in the
     Northeast."  Professional Geographer.  21, no.  2 (July 1969),
     227-231.

Local Climatological Data. Boston. Massachusetts. Monthly Summary.
     Asheville, NC: NOAA. National Climatic Data Center, monthly.


                               105

-------
Loring  Air Force  Base.  Maine.  Revised Uniform  Summary of  the
     Surface Weather Observations. Parts A-F. Scott Air Force Base,
     IL: Air  Force Environmental Technical  Applications Center,
     1987. *

Miller, J.F.  et  al.  Probable Maximum Precipitation  for the Upper
     Deerfield River Drainage Massachusetts/Vermont. Springfield,
     VA: NOAA. National Weather Service. Office of Hydrology, Water
     Management Information Division, 1984.

Mohnen,  V.A.   Exposure of  Forests  to  Air Pollutants.  Clouds.
     Precipitation and Climatic Variables.  Research Triangle Park,
     NC: U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, Atmospheric Research
     and Exposure Assesment Laboratory,  (in cooperation with State
     University of NY  at Albany),  1989.  *  (EPA report no.  EPA-R-
     813934; EPA/600/3-89/003).

Monthly Normals  of  Temperature.  Precipitation,  and  Heating  and
     Cooling Degree Days 1951-1980. Asheville, NC: NOAA. National
     Climatic Data Center, 1982.

Morrill, R.A. et al. Maine Coastal Storm and Flood of February 2,
     1976: Report  Prepared  Jointly  by the  U.S. Geological Survey
     and  the  National Oceanic  and  Atmospheric  Administration.
     Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.

North American Droughts. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1978.

Otis  Air  National Gaurd  Base.   Massachusetts.   Revised Uniform
     Summary of Surface Weather Observations. Parts  A-F.  Scott Air
     Force Base,  IL: Air Force Environmental Technical Applications
     Center, 1987. *

Palley, Patricia A. and Miller, David R. "Climate Data  Sources  in
     Connecticut."  (Storrs,  Connecticut University)  Acrricultual
     Experiment Station Bulletin. 461, 1982. *

Pannuto,  Robert  J.  "Review of  Mt.  Washington Observation  in
     Relation to Winter Weather  at Boston." News Bulletin  (Mount
     Washington Observatory,  Gorham,  NH),  16,  no.l  (March  1975),
     17-21.

Pearson, F.J and Fisher, D.W. Chemical Composition  of Atmospheric
     Precipitation in the Northeastern United  States. Washington:
     U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971. (Sudoc no.  119.3:1535-
     P).

Proceedings.   Sertlina Forest. NY;   Conference on the  Drought  in
     •hhe  Northeastern  United  States. 1967.   Pub.  NY: New  York
     University Press, 1968.
                                106

-------
Rao, G.A. Drought Probability  Maps.  Geneva:  World Meteorological
     Organization,  1987.

Revised Uniform Summary of  Surface Weather Observations. Pease Air
     Force Base.  New Hampshire. Scott Air Force Base,  IL: Air Force
     Environmental Technical Applications Center, 1985.

Richardson,  William  S. et al.  Tide  Climatology  for  Boston.
     Massachusetts.  Boston,  MA:  NOAA  National  Weather  Service,
     Forecast Office,  1982. *

Sanders, Frederick and Bosart, Lance F.  "Mesoscale Structure in the
     Megalopolitan Snowstorm, 11-12 February 1982. Pt.  2, Doppler
     Radar  Study of  the New England  Snowband." Journal  of  the
     Atmospheric Sciences.  42,  no.  13 (July 1985), 1398-1407.  *

Shenton, Edward H.  and Horton,  Donald B. Literature Review of the
     Marine  Environment  Data  for  Eastport.  Maine,   rev.   ed.
     Portland: ME:  Research Institute of the Gulf of Maine, 1973.

Significant Snowstorms. Northeastern United  States.  Bedford,  MA:
     Weather Services Corp., 1978.

Silver, Andrew L. and Brown, Wendell S. Great Bay Estuarine Field
     Program; 1975 Data Report. Pt.  2.  Temperature.  Salinity and
     Density. Durham,  NH:  University  of New  Hampshire,  Durham;
     Dept. of Earth Sciences, 1979. *

Stensland,  Gary J.   Precipitation  Chemistry   Trends   in   the
     Northeastern  United  States.   In   Proceedings   of  the  12th
     Rochester International Conference on Environmental Toxicity.
     NY: Plenum Press, 1980. *

Suckling, Phillip W.  and  Kimsey,  Mary B.  "Seasonal Snowfall in
     Northern  New  England:   Recent   Trends  and  Variability."
     Climatological Bulletin. 22,  no. 2 (Aug. 1988), 14-25. *

Summary of Meteorological Observations.  Surface  (SMOS).  Brunswick.
     Maine. Asheville, NC:  Naval Oceanography Command Detachment,
     1988. *

Summary of Meteorological  Observations.  Surface (SMOS)  for South
     Weymouth. Massachusetts.  Asheville,  NC:  Naval Oceanography
     Command Detachment, 1988.  *

Summary  of Meteorological Observations.  Surface  (SMOS).  South
     Weymouth. Massachusetts.  Asheville, NC:  Naval Oceanography
     Command Detachment, 1984.  *
                               107

-------
Summary  of  Synoptic  Meteorological  Observatons;  North  American
     Coastal  Marine Areas  -Revised.  Atlantic  and Gulf  Coasts.
     Volume 2. Area 8 -  St.  Lawrence  River.  Area 9 -  Gulf of St.
     Lawrence. Area 10 -Cape  Breton Island S.E..  Area 11 - Halifax.
     Area 12 - Boston. Area 13 - Quonset Point. Area 14 - New York.
     Washington, DC: Naval Weather Service Command, 1975.

Surface Observation Climatic  Summaries (SOCS) for Hanscom Air Force
     Base. Bedford. Massachusetts. Scott  Air Force Base,  IL: Air
     Force Environmental Technical Applications Center,  1989.

Thorp, John M.  and  Scott,  Bryan C.  "Preliminary Calculations of
     Average  Storm Duration  and  Seasonal  Precipitation  Rates for
     the  Northeast  Sector   of  the United  States."  Atmospheric
     Chemistry. 16, no. 7 (1982), 1763-1774. *

U.S. Drought 1988;  a Climate  Assessment. Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept.
     of Commerce. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
     [1988] .

United States Army-  Corps of Engineers. New York District. Flood
     Plain Information. Dog  River. Northfield.  Vermont.  New York:
     The Corps, 1975.

United States Environmental Data  Service.  Weather Atlas  of the
     United States. Originally titled: Climatic Atlas of the United
     States. Detroit: Gayle  Research Co.,  1975.

United  States National  Oceanic  and  Atmospheric Administration.
     Climatic  Atlas of  the  United States.  Asheville,  NC:  NOAA
     Natioanl Climatic Center, 1977.

United States Weather Bureau.  Climates  of the States. 1959-1969.
     Washington: U.S. Dept.  of Commerce, Weather Bureau, 1969.

Westover  Air  Force  Base.  Chicopee Falls.  Massachusetts  Revised
     Uniform  Summary  of  Surface  Weather Observations. Parts A-F.
     Scott Air  Force  Base,  IL:  Air Force Environmental Technical
     Application Center,  1981. *

Westover Air Force  Base. Massachusetts Limited Surface Observations
     Climatic Summary. Parts A.  C-F. Scott Air Force Base,  IL: Air
     Force Environmental  Technical Applications  Center, 1986. *

Wind. Ceiling, and Visibility Data at Selected Airports. Vol.l. New
     England Region. United States Federal Aviation Administration,
     Dept. of Transportation, 1980. n.p.
                               108

-------
Note: * = abstract available on request

           Climate Librarian
  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
            Mail Drop MD 80
    Research  Triangle Park,  NC  27709
              FTS  629-0912
                   or
              919-541-0912
                  109

-------