TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5
              symposium
    Air over Cities

     \
                PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
     ROBERT A. TAFT SANITARY ENGINEERING CENTER

-------
                                                           Symposium
                                                       Air Over Cities
Sponsored by the
Laboratory of Engineering and
  Physical Sciences
           of the
Division of Air Pollution
U. S. Department of
Health, Education, and Welfare
Public Health Service
Robert A.  Taft
Sanitary Engineering Center
Held November 6-7, 1961
Cincinnati, Ohio

-------
                           CONTENTS

                                                           Page

INTRODUCTION	'.	     v

SESSION 1:  CITY AIR - BETTER OR WORSE?
                   Chairman:  H. E. LANDSBERG	     1
   Air Pollution Studies in the Netherlands.  F. H. SCHMIDT ....    23
   Recent Developments in the  Chemistry of Urban
      Atmospheres. J. P. LODGE, JR   	    31
   A Climatological Evaluation of Precipitation Patterns
      Over an Urban Area. S. A. CHANGNON, JR	    37
   Some Effects of Air Pollution on Visibility In and
      Near Cities.  G.  C. HOLZWORTH  	    69
   Smoke Concentrations in Montreal Related to Local
      Meteorological Factors.  P. W.  SUMMERS	    89
   The Air Over Philadelphia,  F. K. DAVIS, JR  	   115
   The Thermal Climate of Cities.  J. M. MITCHELL,  JR	   131
   Some Observations of Cloud Initiation In  Industrial
      Areas.  G. E. STOUT	   147

SESSION 2:  THE DISPERSION AND DEPOSITION
             OF AIR POLLUTANTS OVER CITIES
                   Chairman:  M. NEIBERGER	   155
   Analog Computing Techniques Applied to Atmospheric
      Diffusion: Continuous Area Source.  F. V. BROCK	   173
   Dispersion Calculations for  Multiple Sources.
      F. POOLER, JR	   189
   Some Effects of City Structure on the Transport of Air-
      borne Material in Urban Areas.  W. A. PERKINS	   197
   Source Configurations and Atmospheric Dispersion in
      Mathematical Models of Urban Pollution Distributions.
      G. R HILST	   209
   Some Aspects of Atmospheric Diffusion in Urban
      Areas.  JAMES HALITSKY	   217

SESSION 3:  PRESENT AND  FUTURE NEEDS FOR
             METEOROLOGICAL AND AIR  QUALITY
             OBSERVATIONS
                   Chairman: J. J. SCHUENEMAN
   The Relative Importance of Some Meteorological
      Factors in Urban Air Pollution.  ELMER ROBINSON	   229
   Measurement Programs Required for Evaluation of
      Man-Made and Natural  Contaminants in Urban
      Areas.  E. W. HEWSON, E. W. BIERLY, AND J. C.  GILL	   239
   The Representativeness of Local Observations in Air
      Pollution Surveys.  M. E. SMITH	   259
   Present and Future Needs for Meteorological  and  Air
      Quality Observations in Canada.  R. E.  MUNN	   267
   Problems Associated with Forecasting Air Pollution
      Over an Urban Area. E. K. KAUPER	   269
   The Need for More Meaningful Meteorological and Air
      Quality Observations for Mortality and Morbidity
      Studies. F. FIELD AND J. K. MCGUIRE	   277
                              m

-------
                                Introduction

                                ARTHUR C. STERN, Chief, Laboratory of
                                Engineering and Physical Sciences,
                                Division of Air Pollution:
      My function here is to say welcome, but I have chosen in-
stead to  take the 10 minutes allotted to me to forecast what the
role of the meteorologist, particularly the one in charge of a
Weather Bureau station in a large metropolitan area,  will be in
the year 1985.   This I hope may give you a little pattern for the
talks to follow,  and if you succeed in the following 2 days in set-
ting all of the groundwork for this chore in  1985,  we will have ful-
filled our reason for getting together here.
      Now,  firstly, in 1985 the people will be more interested in
whether the air is safe to breathe than whether it will rain. This,
of course, will completely change many of the paramount func-
tions in  the normal operation of a Weather Bureau station.
      During a typical day in the Weather Bureau station,  the
staff will not only study the classical weather maps at ground
level and aloft,  but also a recently developed (before  1985) basic
horizontal plane air quality isoconcentration map.  In addition to
the latter horizontal plane maps, we will, of course,  by then have
a very well-developed set of  vertical elevation data for a number
of latitudes and longitudes, from the ground up to 5, 000 feet. At
particular stations, we will get  from the facsimile  elevation maps
showing temperature,  pressure, air movement, humidity,  and
air quality in the vertical plane.  The station staff will  choose the
latitudes and longitudes that  intersect the particular urban com-
plex where their major interest lies,  and also those proximate
thereto.  And although advisories will be sent from Washington --
I presume Washington will still  be the capital of the United States
then -- giving  72-hour, 48-hour, and 24-hour air quality fore-
casts, these forecasts will be routinely combined with the data
obtained from the local vertical elevation maps and isoconcentra-
tion maps for air quality.  The meteorologist will combine these
with the daily source strength prediction, which he will receive
each day from the local air pollution control agency; these two
sets of data will be fed into the station electronic computer, which
I am sure each of the stations by then will have.
      To obtain these vertical elevation maps, we must have by
1985 a very well-developed national network for vertical sounding
from the ground to 5, 000 feet; this network  will be as intense

-------
vertically as our horizontal network is now intense horizontal y.

      The electronic computer will develop local forecasts of air
quality and the maximum source strength distribution that will
keep pollutant emissions within air quality standard limits.

      These latter data, that is the maximum source strength dis-
tributions, will simultaneously be typed out not only at the com-
puter in the Weather Bureau station but also at the air pollution
control headquarters, which will  use them to provide  quotas to
various agencies.
      I don't know whether by 1985 we can give hourly quotas, but
certainly we will be giving quotas to the highway entrance control
points as to the number of vehicles permitted to pass  each hour,
and to industrial sources for their hourly emission quotas.  Also
we will determine which portion of energy used in household and
commercial enterprises is to be drawn hourly from energy  stor-
age reserves maintained for that  purpose,  and  which portion may
come from new energy conversion processes.  Thus on bad days
we will balance the ability of the atmosphere to handle the pollu-
tion with the amount that we throw into the atmosphere.

      About at this  point the computer will be hooked up to the
telemetered local air quality monitoring network to make hourly
comparisons between the  predicted and the actual concentrations
and to prepare hourly amendments to the source strength quotas.
                             VI

-------
Session 1:  City Air - Better or Worse
H. E. LANDSBERG,* chairman
Summary

     Human activity has caused considerable changes in local climates.  These modifi-
cations in turn have affected the temperatures of the lowest layer of the atmosphere, the
diurnal  temperature range, the shape of the diurnal temperature curve, the local relative
humidity, the local electric field, the patterns and amounts of precipitation, and the speed
and direction of winds.  These effects have probably only a minor influence upon human
well-being. Other changes, however, have potentially harmful effects. The most radical
effect has been on atmospheric suspensions and admixtures. None of these changes have
been beneficial.  The growth of nearly all urban areas and industrial complexes has out-
paced the engineering and legal efforts to minimize the nuisance and the possible dangers
of contamination.  Already the  ill winds from one settlement can influence the next town
downwind.  The day of planning in terms of single communities is over, and whole region-
al patterns now must be viewed together.  Our knowledge of air quality and its effects on
health is not yet adequate. In  the interest of public hygiene, an intense effort in bio-
meteorological and medical research is required.
       Census figures show that an ever-increasing percentage  of
our citizens  have  become  urbanites or,  at least,  suburbanites.
Eighty-five percent of  the 28-million increase in the U.  S.  pop-
ulation in the 1951-1960 decade occurred in the  standard metro-
politan areas (as designated by the U. S.  Bureau of the Census in
1961).   These cover only 9  percent of the  area of the country.
This concentration of population has given rise to many problems.
As this  trend continues,  major problems in planning will arise.
Clean water for the population has been of public concern for a
long time, and it is time that we  do something about the  air in
the  metropolitan areas.  The reasons for this are clear  and need
not  be repeated.  As in all planning,  however,  we need a quanti-
tative basis  -- and this is only beginning  to emerge.
       There is no gainsaying that the towns and  the cities consti-
tute a radical change from the natural environment.  These dense
settlements  help in commerce and trade, in culture and services
--and in a bygone age they were  even useful in common defense.
But what price do we pay for our gregariousness ?   Some might
point to slums,  others to the rise in crime, still others  to  traf-
fic difficulties.  As meteorologists we are  particularly interest-
ed in the changes of the atmosphere in urban  areas.   These are
of considerable magnitude and of concern to our health and well-
being.
       Just 300 years ago there was problably only one place in
the  world which found itself vis-a-vis a notable  man-made  cli-
matic change:  London, England.  The chronicler of the  day,
*Director, Office of Climatology, U.S. Weather Bureau

-------
2                        LANDSBERG

John Evelyn, F. R. S. (1661),  gave a classical account of it.  He
focused attention on the problem of smoke pollution, which he
attributed to channel coal used in some early manufacturing
processes.  Since that day and age one metropolis after another
has had to face the same difficulty from various causes.

      In colonial America with its small towns,  wide-open spaces,
and good natural ventilation, about a century after Evelyn a trav-
eler could still admire the clean air.  Thus,  on his trip to the
New World in 1761,  the Vicar of Greenwich,  the Reverend Andrew
Burnaby (1775), a neighbor of smoggy London,  could still rave
about New York:  "It lies in a fine climate, and  enjoys a very
wholesome air.  "  But a century after the American Revolution
we find a  much less sanguine appraisal.  No less an authority
than the medical correspondent of Godey's Lady Book (1873) stat-
ed that the air of cities was thoroughly polluted by organic dust,
thought to be spores or germs.   Our great-grandmothers were
enjoined to scrupulous cleanliness and an unceasing war against
dust lest contagious diseases would threaten their health and even
their lives.   A Mr.  Spence in England and the Reverend Mr.
Gibsone on this  side of the Atlantic suggested that smoke be dis-
charged into the sewers instead of being poured  into the atmos-
phere (Harpers,  1872).
      In the twentieth century the problem has become truly world-
wide.  It affects in a melancholic fasion us, our allies,  the neu-
trals, and the Soviets alike.  Urbanization and industrialization
have  been, and will  remain,  in the ascendance.  Thus the prob-
lem has become a matter of concern even to the World Health
Organization (1961).  It is the central theme with which we want
to grapple in this symposium.

      In the scientific approach of our day we have a few small
advantages over Evelyn.  He had  only his senses of sight and
smell--admittedly formidable qualitative tools--to diagnose the
difference between the natural state and the man-spoiled environ-
ment.  Since Luke Howard published for the first time in 1818
his treatises on the  climate of London,  we  have  been trying to
ascertain by quantitative measures the magnitude of the change.
The result is truly startling.  Not a single  atmospheric element
has remained unchanged in the urban areas.  Although we have
only a few sets of "before" and  "after" measurements, there  are
a large number of running accounts and comparative values be-
tween cities  and  surroundings.

      More  comprehensive surveys in the literature (Kratzer,
1956; Landsberg,  1956) present a more-detailed documentation
thanl can give here.  Kratzer's monograph cites 533 references
up to 1955.   We now accumulate pertinent papers on this subject

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR - BETTER OR WORSE                              3

at the rate of 100 every 5 years, excluding those which deal only
with techniques and effects in the air pollution area.

      Tables 1  and 2 illustrate the  city effect in a gross way.
Table 1 deals primarily with the general climatic elements
(Landsberg,  1958), and Table 2 with atmospheric admixtures
(Katz,  1961).   Where base figures  of undisturbed areas are avail-
able, the differences of the city air environment are stressed.
                          TABLE 1

          CLIMATIC CHANGES PRODUCED BY CITIES

      Element                  Comparison with Rural Environs

Contaminants :
      dust particles	  10 times  more
      sulfur dioxide	   5 times  more
      carbon dioxide 	  10 times  more
      carbon monoxide 	  25 times  more

Radiation:
      total on horizontal surface	  15 to 20% less
      ultraviolet,  winter  	       30% less
      ultraviolet,  summer	        5% less

Cloudiness:
      clouds  	   5 to 10% more
      fog,  winter	      100% more
      fog,  summer  	       30% more

Precipitation:
      amounts	   5 to 10% more
      days with 0. 2 in	       10% more

Temperature:
      annual mean  	,	   1 to 1. 5 F more
      winter minima	   2 to 3 F more

Relative Humidity:
      annual mean	        6% less
      winter	        2% less
      summer  	        8% less

Wind Speed:
      annual mean 	  20 to 30% less
      extreme gusts 	  10 to 20% less
      calms   	   5 to 20% more
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
4                        LANDSBERG

                          TABLE 2

        CONCENTRATION OF SOME AIR POLLUTANTS
           IN THE ATMOSPHERE OF URBAN AREAS
                                    Concentration,
                 Pollutant          	ppm	

             Carbon Dioxide . .      300 to  1000
             Carbon Monoxide . .  .    1. 0 to 200
             Oxides of Nitrogen .  ..0.01 to 1.0
             Sulfur Dioxide	0. 01 to 3. 0
             Aldehydes        . .    0.01 to 1.0
             Chlorides.         ...  0. 00 to 0. 3
             Oxidants               0. 00 to 0. 8
             Ammonia       . .     . 0. 00 to 0. 21
             Fluorides	   0. 00 to 0. 08
             Dust    . .   . .     .... 5 to  100 milliona
             Also highly variable amounts of gross
             dust, micro-organisms and  pollen.

              Dust concentration in particles per
              cubic foot.

      This raises the following fundamental question: are  there
any undisturbed atmospheric conditions left in the  mechanized
areas of the world?  The  answer is probably "No, " and we have
to be  satisfied with using  the less-perturbed conditions  in the rural
zone  near the  city for our base values.  These data give us an
approximate  picture of how much human activity has unwittingly
altered the parameters of the lowest layer of the atmosphere.
      Two major changes  have been introduced by  man.   One is
the  radical alteration of the surface,  the other is the continuous
addition of a  wide variety  of  substances -- gaseous,  liquid,  and
solid  --to the air.  It is not entirely possible to separate the
effects  of these alterations; however, some of them can be stated
in general terms.

      The change of surface  involves particularly the radiation
balance.  In some locations a new effective surface is created;
run-off and evaporation character of the surface is sweepingly
altered.  The air motion is basically affected by changes in the
roughness parameters.  On a microscale, wind channeling occurs.
Thus,  we see that even a  city without heating devices, industry,
or motorized traffic would create a climate different from that of
the  surroundings.   A mental picture can be made by imagining the
replacement  of fields,  forests,  streams,  and ponds by a barren

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR  BETTER OR WORSE                              5

rock formation with deep canyon-like cuts.

      The other change is even more complex.  The simplest
phase involves the addition of heat from local sources, ranging
from the  metabolism of the inhabitants  to domestic and industrial
heating processes.  Substantial amounts of water vapor also are
added from combustion processes,  and by steam releases from
power plants,  laundries, and other industrial establishments.
The gamut of chemicals injected into the atmosphere is yet to  be
listed anywhere.  From a meteorological point of view dust par-
ticles in the sub-micron and micron ranges, carbon dioxide, and
a few hygroscopic  substances are probably most important.  From
the aspect of health and hygiene many more substances could be
cited.   Perhaps carbon monoxide,  sulfur dioxide, some alde-
hydes,  and  fluorine compounds should be singled out because of
their immediate noxious effects.
      Here  might be a good point to digress.  Although a  great
deal has been learned about the special climatic characteristics
of cities, progress has been hampered for two reasons:

      1.  Too little information is available on a  strictly com-
      parative basis from series of observations in the city and
      in rural  proximity.  Generally, such parallel series are
      available by accident rather than  by design.  This is the
      case for the usually observed weather elements  at a city
      station and an outlying airport.  These intercomparisons
      are often complicated by the fact  that  airports are located
      in selected microclimates and at  considerable distances.
      Lacking particularly are simultaneous observations of the
      radiation balance and of the vertical wind structure in the
      lowest 1000 feet.
      2.  The second point covers the special orographic and
      geographic peculiarities of various locales.  With some
      luck we might contrive  to arrive at an abstraction of a city
      climate per se,  in contrast to a forest climate or a moun-
      tain climate ~o~r an island climate  or other types  of meso-
      climates. For practical purposes, however, this will
      accomplish little. In addition each city climate must be
      studied for its own peculiarities.   This is particularly es-
      sential since many settlements  are in a specific locality
      because of some "favorable" geographical features, such as
      a river,  a lake, a natural harbor, a plain in front of a
      mountain range, or a valley system.  All these features
      introduce microclimatic variants  that couple with the city
      influences to create  special combinations.  Even the macro-
      climatic  setting is of importance.  The problems of South-
      ern California are a striking example.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
6                        LANDSBERG

      In addition to the broad general studies of city climates,
therefore,  we need detailed analyses of each locality.  In a
modern dynamic approach only a bare start has been made.  The
classical studies of Besson (1931) placed the problem in the right
framework of scientific inquiry and recent publications such as
those on Vienna (Steinhauser _et _al.  1955,  1957,  1959) have shown
most exhaustively what can be done.  In this country we have con-
siderable  information on the Los Angeles  Basin by many contrib-
utors.  (Only a few are cited here:  Edinger, 1958;  Edinger and
Helvey, 1961; Neiburger,  1955a,  1955b; Haagen-Smit, 1958;
Frenkiel,  1957. ) Even these  fine studies  remain fragmented re-
ports and  papers. And what about the other 74 standard metro-
politan areas?   There exist only a few scattered studies on their
atmospheric  environment.   Private  enterprise,  the planners of
the future, and even the intelligent citizen-voters need author-
itative and comprehensive  reference sources on the mesoclimate
of the metropolitan areas;  these, however, remain  to be written.
      In returning to the main theme,  I would like to cover some
of the principal alterations in climate caused by cities.   Much  of
this will illustrate points already made.  In view of the system
employed  by  past studies,  it is easiest to  proceed by meteorolog-
ical elements.
      There is some information --if rather limited --on radi-
ation conditions. The gist is  that the  city environment, particu-
larly smoke,  reduces  the total duration  of sunshine and the
intensity of solar radiation.  The latter  is particularly notable in
the short  wave lengths.
      This is easily demonstrated for illumination.   The city
generally  is darker than the environs.  A  survey in the industrial
section  of Zaporozhe  in the Ukraine, a center for the production
of steel and other metals in the Dnieper Valley, showed this well
(Fedorov,  1958).  There the midday diffuse illumination was re-
duced by about 5 percent in May and June  and by 21 percent in
December, with an average annual reduction of 13 percent.

      There is need for a great deal more information on com-
parative values  of spectral intensity of solar radiation at the
earth's  surface inside and outside the city atmosphere.  This is
the more desirable because of the bactericidal action of ultra-
violet radiation below  3000 A.  Even in polluted city air there is
still some residual killing action of solar  radiation  on microbes,
as experiments  in Leningrad (Krupins et al. ,  1954) demonstrated.
We know very little about conditions across a metropolitan area,
based on standardized micro-organisms and simultaneous  spectral
pyrheliometer observations.  We do not even know with certainty
that some of  the pollution products did not kill the microbes used

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR   BETTER OR WORSE                              7

in the experiments carried on so far.

      Locally,  the absorption of radiation by the polluted city air
might have fairly  profound influences  on the temperature of the
absorbing layer.  In England recent measurements in the infra-
red from aircraft have shown that in extreme cases this effect
may account for temperature rises of as much as  5°C  (Roach,
1961).   The magnitude of the attenuations  is shown in Table 3.

                           TABLE  3

   COMPONENTS OF ATTENUATION IN LOWEST 1, 000 FEET
                   OF THE ATMOSPHEREa
                      Visible x , %   Infra-red  A.,  %   Total xi, %
Absorption                  5              35            20
Back- scattering             5               55
Forward-scattering        90              60            75
Total                     100             100           100

aAfter W. T.  Roach
      The conviction of the author is that the absorption 'effects
contribute in reality only in a minor way to the temperature rises
that have been observed in cities.  These have been documented
for many locations, ever since Luke Howard's early effort.  With
all the orographic varieties that are found in city locations, the
"heat island"  effect is well demonstrated.  One of the most thor-
ough recent studies in a not-too-complicated setting is  that of
Sundberg for Uppsala (1950, 1951).   Mitchell (1953) has shown
that population increases account reasonably well  for some of the
secular changes observed in metropolitan areas.

      As for many other micro- and mesoclimatic effects, city
influence becomes most obvious on  clear days  and nights.  (It is,
of course,  always there. )  An interesting effect is notable in the
diurnal variation of temperature.  In the hours after sunrise, city
and country show  little difference; by and large, the maxima are
not too different.  But in the late afternoon the differences begin
to show.  In the country cooling with setting sun is rapid.  Out-
going radiation is unimpeded.  Grass and soil lose their heat by
radiation rapidly; little heat is supplied from deeper layers.   In
the city, pavements and house walls absorb a lot of heat during
the hours of high sun.  After sunset they begin to radiate toward
each other instead of against the sky.  They are better  heat con-
ductors than open land with vegetation.  Hence they can draw on
conducted heat from lower layers.  Direct heat sources are also
involved (furnaces etc. ).   Their effect is greatest during the cool
hours of the day.  All this combines into a slower decline of tem-
perature in  the evening, higher temperatures at night,  and

SYMPOSIUM:   AIR OVER CITIES

-------
8                        LANDSBERG

notably higher minima.  This is demonstrated by frequency dis-
tributions of country-city temperature differences for the daily
extremes.  In the simplest orographic settings there is little
difference in the daily  maxima; the differences are almost nor-
mally distributed.   In the minima,  however,  the distribution is
notably skewed.  Both  in summer and in winter there is a high
preponderance of excess temperatures  in the city, with the
largest departures noted in winter.
      The larger the city, the more pronounced the effect between
center and outskirts becomes.  The complications that arise are
often the effect of microclimatic  settings.   These are  particularly
notable in the warm season when land,  lake,  or sea  breezes and
mountain and valley breezes  attain their greatest extent.  The
literature contains some exceptional examples  of contrasts in
temperature between a city and its  surroundings.   In many cases
only a  fraction of the observed temperature contrast can be as-
cribed to city influence (Duckworth and Sandberg,  1954).
      There are,  however, some beneficial effects of the nightly
temperature excess  in the city.   It  reduces the heating degree-
day values and hence the fuel requirements.  A comparison of  13
pairs  of city-versus-airport  station records in the Weather Bur-
eau network shows an average of 10 percent reduction in degree-
days between the two locations.   Baltimore is a typical case. The
mean  annual value of degree-days at the Friendship  International
Airport is 4787 but only  4203 in the downtown district.  For a
completely fair picture one should  also present comparative data
for cooling degree-days  in summer,  but, unfortunately,  no series
of such observations has as yet been worked up.

      A direct effect of the slightly warmer city climate  is a re-
duction in seasonal snowfall.  This has recently been shown for
Montreal and Toronto (Potter,  1961).  In Toronto, which has a
seasonal total of 60 inches,  a decrease of about 2 inches can be
ascribed to city effect.

      In a number of cities the increased minima lead to an ear-
lier cessation of freezes in spring  and later initiation of the
freezing season in autumn.   The  values are quite variable accord-
ing to the microclimatic settings, but differences of a week on
either end of the freeze-free season apply to  many cities.

      Meteorologically most  intriguing is the behavior of precip-
itation over city areas.  It is of interest in the air pollution prob-
lem because of the  substantial wash-out effects of precipitation.
These are generally beneficial,  except for the presence  of fission
products from weapons tests.  It should be stated at the  outset
that the influences of the city on  precipitation are most complex
and the various skeins are not easily unraveled.  We can say with

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR   BETTER OR WORSE                              9

reasonable confidence, however, that most of them tend to in-
crease precipitation.  These causes are enumerated without
emphasis on the order:  water vapor addition from combustion
processes and factories;  thermal updrafts from local heating; up-
drafts from increased friction turbulence; added nuclei of conden-
sation leading more readily to cloud formation;  and added nuclei
which might possibly act as freezing centers for subcooled cloud
particles.

      Only  a few pieces of evidence are cited here.  The  case of
the gradual increase of rainfall over Tulsa, Oklahoma, with its
growth from a village to a city in 5  decades,  is presented with
diffidence.  The fact that current rainfall comparisons between
city and airport station still show about an 8 percent difference
lends some support to the hypothesis that in this orographically
uninfluenced area the city really has led to the precipitation in-
crease.  The winter values are relatively higher; this is  also
favorable to the hypothesis of city influence because shower con-
ditions in summer are not likely to be too much affected.
      The excess  production of condensation nuclei over the city
is a long-established fact (Landsberg,  1938) and has been re-
affirmed with many amplifying circumstances (Georgii, 1959). We
do not yet have complete  evidence for the freezing nuclei, although
measurements in  the Washington,  D.  C. , area suggest that for
the low-temperature end there is a considerable surplus  in the
metropolitan area (Kline  and Brier,  1961).  There is even a sug-
ges'tion that giant  nuclei,  which may  initiate the coalescence
process, are more abundant in an industrial area than elsewhere
(Semonin and Stouk,  1961).
      We can hardly escape the conclusion that a pollution effect
is at work when a weekly cycle is shown to be operative in indus-
trial areas.  This was first suggested by  Ashworth (1929) in
England's industrial area.  Frederick recently (1961) made a new
analysis of  this phenomenon in the United States.  He showed a
definite minimum of Sunday rainfall for a 10-year period  at Louis-
ville, Pittsburgh,  and Buffalo.  These cities had fewer total days
with precipitation on Sundays than on weekdays and the least aver-
age amounts for rainy Sundays compared  to rainy weekdays.
This study is still incomplete but is certainly suggestive.   The
possibility of "seeding1' over metropolitan areas  is strongly sus-
pected in a  snowfall case reported (v. Kienle, 1952) for Mannheim,
Germany,  and might well have been the case for a rather remark-
able snowfall in Leicestershire, England  (Murray, 1957). A
strong city  influence is also suggested in  the snow patterns pub-
lished (Potter, 1961) for Toronto,  Ontario.  Here, as  in other
cities, mesoclimatic influences such as Lake Ontario may play a
role.   Such influences may not be entirely lacking in the rainfall

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
 10                       LANDSBERG

 patterns over Chicago, although an urban effect on rainfall there
 seems to be present almost without  doubt.  The study by Chagnon
 (1961) estimates this effect accounts for 2. 3 inches of an annual
 total around 35 inches.
      In the smaller town of Champaign-Urbana, Illinois,  Huff
 and Chagnon (1960) found no higher frequency of excessive rain-
 falls, of practical importance, than in the surroundings.  Their
 study is a reminder of an earlier, almost unknown dissertation by
 Belger  (1940),  who investigated some frontal storms over Berlin,
 Germany.  He  studied only four cases in detail but in two found
 very marked increases in  rain intensity over the metropolis; a
 similar case has been discussed by  Hull (1957) for Washington,
 D. C.   More important, perhaps, is Belger's rather remarkable
 finding that in all the Berlin cases a notable  retardation of the
 squall lines or rain fronts over the city took place.
      This brings us to the consideration of an important question:
 what  influence does a  city exercise  on the circulation?  We do
 know  that the wind speed is considerably reduced in the built-up
 area.   This is a simple consequence of increased friction.   There
 have been suggestions from time to  time that with weak gradient
 winds the city is capable of setting up its  own circulation.  The
 late Professor Berg in Cologna (1959) tried to obtain evidence  for
 a city and country breeze system.  He concluded that a general
 wind of 1 to 2 meters per second is  sufficient to suppress the
 nightly country breeze, which otherwise can be set up by the 3°
 to 3. 5°C temperature  difference between the city and the country.
 I know of only one well-documented  case of complete convergence
 of wind from all sides into the  city.   This was based on rime
 deposits in the  Japanese city of Asahikawa (Okita,  1960).

      With the help of  data from meteorologically instrumented
 towers we are beginning to get a feel for the temperature field in
 the vertical over a city area,  as shown by the  studies of DeMarrais
 (1961) for Louisville and earlier by  Duckworth and Sandberg (1954)
for San Francisco.  These studies indicate that the city undoubt-
 edly superimposes a wind field of its own upon the  general flow
pattern.  Observations of slow pilot balloons and floating balloons,
used over some west coast cities, have given similar indications.
Nevertheless it is almost impossible with the material now avail-
able to disentangle land and sea breeze or mountain and valley
breeze from the city and country breeze.   Investigations in much
 simpler orographic settings are needed.

      From a practical point of view the general flow patterns
 and dynamic conditions in the atmosphere are  probably more im-
 portant.  These will be discussed later.   Here may be a good
 place  to insert  information on the material human activities add

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR - BETTER OR WORSE                            11

to the air of our cities.  These cover probably the whole range of
chemical substances used in modern civilization and all the by-
products produced incidentally in their manufacture.  In addition,
there are all the intermediate and end products of combustion
processes, not the least of which are those of internal combustion
engines of motor vehicles.

      Much of the material is in  solid form, ranging from  sub-
micron particles to flyash in the millimeter sizes.  The larger
particles fall out by gravity and  generally stay in the urban or
suburban areas.   In the modern  metropolitan districts this dust
amounts to 100 tons per square mile per month.  It is likely to be
more a nuisance than a menace.  McDonald (1961) recently es-
timated the mean  residence time of this material at a few hours
only.  It must be assumed that the  smaller particles stay sus-
pended for a much longer time (Hess, 1959).  The largest  fraction
appears  to be in the micron size.  This material without doubt
penetrates into the upper respiratory passages  and,  according to
its composition,  might readily serve as an irritant.  There is
also persistent evidence that the number of microbial organisms
shows a  high correlation to the number of suspended particles.
Although it is not  proven, there  is  a suspicion that some of these
organisms attach  themselves to  the suspensions.  The influence
of the  suspensions on the electric properties  of the atmosphere
are well known (Beckett,  1958; Miihleisen, 1959).  Whether or
not this has health effects remains to be  explored (Reiter,  1960).

      There is a better estimate on the effects of the gaseous ad-
mixtures.  Only 03, CO, CO2, and SO2 are mentioned here.  The
oxidants usually represented by  ozone have been most widely dis-
cussed (Neiburger, 1959); they are  by no means restricted to
Southern California, (see e. g. ,  Wanta et al. , 1961).  These ox-
idants show definite adverse effects on both crop plants and
humans.  Much less demonstrated is the influence of CO.  This
insidious compound is present in appreciable quantities in  the
traffic-clogged canyon streets of our cities.  A survey in Ham-
burg, Germany,  revealed some  remarkable consequences  (Effen-
berger,  1957) of  carbon monoxide in city air.  Suburban residents
showed 1. 56  percent carboxyhemoglobin  in blood samples; those
living in city apartments 1. 82 percent and traffic policemen as
much as 9. 5  percent.  We may wonder how many headaches can
be attributed to this pollutant.  Under inversion conditions with
calm,  concentrations of 0. 005 volume percent of CO were  found;
this  is decidedly high value for a gas that shows such deadly af-
finity for our blood.
      The production of CO2 by combustion processes is another
source of urban and industrial air pollution.  As far as  health
effects go, it probably can be dismissed,  even though it may

SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
 12                       LANDS BERG

 increase by 10 percent over the normal in polluted city air.  An
 example of this is shown in the difference between December and
 April mean values by Steinhauser (1959) for Vienna.  Much has
 been written about the possible influence of CO2 concentration
 upon heat absorption in the atmosphere.  Some have adduced it  as
 the cause of rising temperatures of the earth (Callendar,  1961),
 and  although this is  only a hypothesis at present, the matter
 deserves  close watch in the future.
      SO2 is probably  another pollution product (Weiss and
 Frenzel,  1956; Lenshin,  1958).  There is good evidence,  for ex-
 ample that SO2 increased markedly in the fatal London smog of
 December 1952.  Russian workers (Bushtuveva, 1954) have shown
 that  such  increases  in SO2 are related linearly to simultaneous
 presence  and increases in H2SO4.  These irritants are likely to
 be among those causing the well-known symptoms of air pollution
 afflictions.
      At present we can only wonder how much city air contrib-
 utes to general morbidity.  It is  certainly a problem that requires
 more  detailed  attention than it has been given heretofore (Hei-
 mann, 1961).   Offhand it  appears that the city influence would be
 more pronounced on respiratory diseases than on diseases  affect-
 ing any other system of the organism.  Just contemplate this
 formidable list:  asthma, bronchitis,  bronchiectasis, common
 cold, diptheria, emphysema,  the influenzas,  the pneumonias,
 laryngitis, phthisis, pleurisy, tuberculosis,  and whooping cough.
 Although many of these are caused by specific microorganisms,
 others are simply symptom-complexes possibly due to  chemical
 irritations, which in many cases are followed by infections
 (Babayants, 1949).   Respiratory complications are often the cause
 of death in the elderly afflicted with cardiac and circulatory ail-
 ments.  Although, except for episodes of the  Donora type, these
 relations cannot readily be  discovered (Hechter and Goldsmith,
 1961),  the  subjective complaints should not be overlooked.  In  a
 recent survey,  for example, residents in the Los Angeles area,
 showed a much higher incidence  of malaise attributed to air pol-
lution than other inhabitants of California (Table 4) (Breslow,
 1961).  Although psychological factors might  have inflated these
figures, they cannot be completely dismissed.

      In spite of the  many contributing local micrometeorological
factors, the general meteorological pattern of air pollution is
 simple.  There is essentially only  one factor that  causes accumu-
lation of waste  products  — lack of ventilation.  Two elements con-
tribute to this:   (1) vertical stability or low-level inversions that
 prevent vertical motions and turbulence and (2)  calms and slight
wind motion.  From general climatological observations and the
upper air records a  picture of the air pollution potential of various

                               SEC  TECHNICAL  REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR   BETTER OR WORSE                             13
                           TABLE 4
          AIR  POLLUTION EFFECTS REPORTED BY
                  CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS21

 (Percent of people surveyed who registered complaints in Los
 Angeles County compared with those in remainder of State. )

               Ailment              Excess % Cases
          Eye  complaints                   22
          Nose complaints                  21
          Asthma                           17
          Throat complaints                 16
          Hay  fever                         13
          Shortness of breath               11
          Coughing                         10
          Bad  headaches                    10
&From Breslow (1961?).

localities or broad geographical regions can be gained.  The most
recent publications in this field are by Dickson (1961), Boettger
(1961),  and Hosier (1961).  These studies show that vast areas of
the United States have these two meteorological prerequisites for
temporary air  pollution accumulations.  Fortunately, the self-
cleansing mechanisms of the  atmosphere are also at work. Grav-
ity helps in promoting fallout; basically,  however,  strong wind
and washout by rain are the effective agents of pollution dispersal
and dilution. Frequent precipitation and winds above 10  miles per
hour can be counted upon in many of our industrialized regions to
hold air pollution to proportions which do not lead to acutely dan-
gerous episodes.  In spite of  the remarkable  natural dissipation
system of pollutants, however,  constant vigilance through con-
tinuous surveillance is important.

      A major  problem of the future is large-area pollution.  Area-
wide difficulties have existed for some time in England's  Mid-
lands and in the German Ruhr region.  In the United States as
population primarily in metropolitan areas increases, towns
grow into cities, and cities into  metropolises.  With sprawling
suburban areas and industrialization along belt highways, separ-
ate urban entities grow together and form a conurbation which
some have dubbed a megalopolis.  Under these circumstances the
pollution spread is no longer  a mathematically neat problem of a
point source influenced by diffusion and turbulence.  Only under
specialized conditions, such as atomic plant operation, is this
still an acute problem.  We do,  however,  have to face the fact
that there are already innumerable  single pollution sources in
various nuclei  over large areas  -- and in the not-too-distant
future in long chains  of cities.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
14
LANDSBERG
       One of these sources will be the city system from Richmond,
Virginia,  to Portland,  Maine.  This stretched-out chain of settle-
ments, industries,  and traffic soon will have to be  studied as a
single entity.  As an example the author tried a very rudimentary
approach as a  crude first approximation.   Since January 1961 the
Weather Bureau has been publishing regularly the daily wind re-
sultant for all  major stations, based on the 24hourly observations
                        BRIDGEPORT.
                              ^
                        NEWARK»»NEW"YORK
                 PHILADELPHIA*
             BALTIMORE

       WASHINGTON, 0. C. •
Figure 1. Daily wind motion, from 24-hourly wind resultant, along the densely settled NE
        coastal sector of the U. S. for first 8 months of 1961.  Black area in frequency
        diagram at right shows cases when air motion is slight and pollution products
        are apt to stay within settled area.
                                  SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR   BETTER OR WORSE                             15

during the  day.  The resultant gives a quick, if not too accurate,
idea of the air transport during the day.  Figure  1 shows a break-
down by  resultant distances of wind movement, for the first 8
months of  1961, for the following sequence of 10  cities:  Richmond,
Va. ,  Washington, D. C. ,  Baltimore, Md. , Philadelphia, Pa. ,
Newark, N. J. ,  New York (La Guardia Field), Bridgeport, Conn. ,
Providence,  R. I. ,  Boston, Mass. , Portland, Me.  Airport winds
can be taken as  fairly representative for a city in general, as
shown in a study of Nashville by Frederick (1961).

      A  considerable number of days showed less than 100 miles
air transport per day.  This means that with suitable wind direc-
tion pollution products  will stay in the general districts of which
these cities are centers.   As might be expected from the general
meteorological pattern of the area, the southern  part of  the chain
shows the  greater number of  slow  transports.  On the other hand
the 8-month sample, which includes data for winter and  spring,
shows a  fair percentage of movements over 300 miles per day.
These can  be considered as a cleansing influence in the area.
Data for autumn will undoubtedly boost the share  of the weak
winds, but these were not  available when this was written.

      Typical situations at the extremes  of this distribution are
shown in Figures 2 and 3.   Figure 2 shows generally  slow winds
along the chain of cities on June 12,  1961.  The very  weak pres-
sure field  of the synoptic situation is a primary indication. Under
such circumstances pollution products can be expected to stay  in
the local area or to be  wafted slowly toward the next city in the
chain.  If visibility is used as a primitive index of pollution,  very
low minima are noted.  Such weather conditions,  at least for
parts of  the chain,  are not exceptionally  rare.
      A  converse case  is shown in Figure 3.  This occurred on
February 9,  1961,  when an offshore low-pressure system with a
tight pressure gradient caused the resultant winds all along the
chain to  be at right angles to the conurbation.  Pollution  products
cannot accumulate under these circumstances and would  be blown
far out to sea.  Even the lowest visibilities of the day were good.
      Obviously, these cases should be studied with more refined
analyses, but this primitive approach gives an idea of future prob-
lems.
      Are there other problems  that should receive more atten-
tion? In the author's opinion,  in our study of the basic problems
of city climate,  we have neglected those man-made factors which
can lead to improvements  (Katz, 1956).   Most of  these are of a
microclimatic nature.  In  the old days it was generally considered
adequate to place smoke sources in the lee of the city according
to the generally prevailing wind  direction; it would be more

SYMPOSIUM: AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
16
                                LANDSBERG
         •  CITY

         •  END-POINT OF DAILY RESULTANT WIND VECTOR

         \/ FALLOUT AREA OF POLLUTION PRODUCTS
Figure 2.  A cose of weak winds.  Upper left inset shows pressure distribution at 0100
          EST. Figures at right show lowest visibilities during 24 hours of 12 June 1961.
                                         SEC TECHNICAL REPORT  A62-5

-------
CITY AIR    BETTER  OR WORSE
17
         •  CITY
         •  END-POINT OF DAILY RESULTANT WIND VECTOR
         \l  FALLOUT AREA OF POLLUTION PRODUCTS
Figure 3.  A case of strong winds.  In this type of situation pollution products are apt to
          be dissipated to sea.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
18                       LANDS BERG

appropriate to substitute the direction prevailing for the slight
winds under inversion conditions.   Local air drainage problems
also should be given greater consideration.

      Among the positive measures are the creation of open
spaces and parklands, avoidance of solid walls of buildings, and
construction of buildings of irregular heights.   All of these coun-
teract the blocking of winds.  For the gross dust,  shrubbery,
trees, and hedges have proven to  be  good filters and could be used
to much greater extent.

      In industrial areas the truly noxious substances must be
suppressed to a much greater extent. This will require further
research  to distinguish between these and the  effluents which are
harmless to health.   Even now the question might be asked;  why
permit any SO2 emission at all?  There are other culprits equally
well known.  Perhaps the idea of  a smoke sewer is not as com-
pletely harebrained as it sounds.   In fact it has been in use for
years in Europe in connection with some smelters.  Certainly
smokestacks on mountain and hill tops will reach over many a
low-level inversion and into the layers of higher wind speeds. The
ratio of cost to benefit is not easily worked out for such an installa
tion on a large scale,  but it certainly deserves a most serious
engineering study with a realistic assessment of the public health
benefits.
      Cars are likely to remain a major  difficulty for many dec-
ades to come.  It  is too much to hope for complete  electrification
of surface transportation,  but more of it may  come in the metro-
politan areas before they choke completely in  traffic tangles and
exhaust fumes.  In connection with the latter the automotive in-
dustry certainly can use more inventors.

      For decades safe drinking water has  been a basic right. The
body needs only a few liters of water each day, whereas,  the body
at rest needs 12, 000  liters of air  in a day and at work twice as
                                               19
much.  At this rate we strain or pass through lO1^ particles per
day.  A contaminant that is present at only one part in a million
moves through the system at the rate of 12 to  20 cubic centimeters
in a day.  For many of these substances we would shudder to think
of getting that much in a single dose.  If we get it diluted we live
in the hope that it is harmless.  Is it too much to expect clean air,
as we have come to expect  clean water?
                        REFERENCES

Anonymous (1873); Floating Dust; Godey's Lady Book (March
      1873), _86,  p.  280.


                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR   BETTER OR WORSE                             19

Anonymous (1872); Harper's New Monthly Magazine (April 1872),
      ^4, p. 786.
Ashworth, J. R.  (1929); The influence of smoke and hot gases
      from factory chimneys on rainfall;  Qu.  Journ.  R.  Meteorol.
      Soc. _55, 341-350.
Babayants, R. A.  (1949); The dependence of diseases of the res-
      piratory tract upon polluted air in the cities (translated
      title); Gigiyena i Sanitariya 12, 3-11.
Beckett, J. C.  (1958); The influence~of air pollution on the elec-
      trical properties of air; Natl.  Conf. on Air Pollut. Proceed
      1958; 114-115.
Belger,  W. (1940),  Der Groszstadteinfluss auf nichtstationare
      Regenfronten und ein Beitrag zur Bildung lokaler Warme-
      gewitter; Berlin Dissertation,  Koln, 69 pp.
Berg,  H. (1959); Nachtlicher Temperaturanstiej am Rande einer
      Groszstadt; Wetter und Leben  11,  9-11.
Besson, L. (1931); L'alteration du climat d'une  grande ville;
      Annales d'Hygiene _9,  (Aout 1931), 34pp.
Boettger,  C. M.  (1961); Air pollution potential east of the Rocky
      Mountains:  Fall 1959; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. _42,  615-
      620.
Breslow, L. (1961);  Air pollution effects reported by California
      residents;  Cal.  Dept.  of Publ.  Health, Berkeley,  56 pp.
Burnaby, A. (1775);  Travels through the  middle settlements  in
      North America in the years 1759 and 1760; Reprinted, Great
      Seal Books (Cornall Univ.  Press),  Ithaca, N. Y. ,  I960,
      154 pp.
Bushtuveva, K. A. (1954); Ratio  of sulfur dioxide and sulfuric
      acid aerosol in atmospheric air in relation to meteorological
      conditions  (translated title); Gigiyena i Sanitariya,  No.  11,
      11-13.
Callendar, G.S.  (1961); Temperature fluctuations and trends over
      the earth; Qu. Journ.  R.  Meteorol.  Soc.,  37, 1-12.
Chagnon, S.A. , Jr.  (1961);  Precipitation contrasts between the
      Chicago urban  area and an offshore station in  southern Lake
      Michigan; Bull. Am.  Meteorol. Soc. 42,  1-10.
DeMarrais, G. A. (1961); Vertical temperature difference ob-
      served over an urban area; Bull.  Am.  Meteorol. Soc.  42,
      548-554.
Dickson, R. R. (1961);  Meteorological factors affecting particulate
      air pollution of a city; Bull. Am.  Meteorol. Soc. 42, 556-
      560.
Duckworth, F. S. , and Sandberg, J. S. (1954); The effect of cities
      upon horizontal and vertical temperature gradients; Bull.
      Am.  Meteorol. Soc. 35, 198-207.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
20                       LANDSBERG

Edinger, J. G.  (1958); Research problems on the meteorology of
      Los Angeles air pollution; Univ. of Calif. ,  Dept.  of
      Meteorol. ;  Report on contract CWB-9309,  48 pp.
Edinger, J. G. , and Helvey,  R. A.  (1961); The San Fernando con-
      vergence zone; Bull. Am. Meteorol.  Soc.  42,  626-635.
Effenberger, E.  (1957); Das Kohlenoxyd und dessen Bedentung in
      der Hygiene;  Medizin-Meteorol. Hefte, Nr. 12.,  128 pp.
Evelyn, J.  (1661); Fumifugium; The inconvenience of the air, and
      smoke  of London dissipated. Oxford; Reprinted by National
      Smoke  Abatement Society,  Manchester 1933,  18 pp.
Federov, M. M.  (1958); The effect of smoke on the illumination
      conditions  of a city (translated title); Gigiena i Sanitarya
      _2J3,  14-18.
Frederick,R. H.  (1961a);  personal communication.
Frederick, R.H.  (1961b);  Surface Wind Study --  Nashville,
      Tennessee; U.S.  Weather Bureau manuscript.
Frenkiel, F. N.  (1957); Atmospheric pollution in growing commu-
      nities;  Smithson. Instit.  Rep. for 1956,  269-299.
Georgii, H. W. (1959);  Probleme und Stand der Erforschung des
      atmospharischen Aerosols;  Ber. d. Dt.  Wetterdienstes,  1_
      (Nr.  51), 44-52.                                        ~~
Haagen-Smith, A.J.  (1958); Air conservation; Science  128, 869-
      878.
Heimann, H. (1961); Effects of air pollution on human health;
      "Air Pollution",  WHO Monogr.  Ser.  46,  159-220.
Hechter, H.H. ,  and Goldsmith, J. R.  (1961); Air pollution and
      daily mortality, Am.  J.  Med. Sci. 241, 581-588.
Hess,  P.  (1959);  Untersuchungen  iiber den Ausfall von Aerosol-
      partikeln durch Niederschlage und Wolkenbildung; Ber.  d.
      Dt. Wetterdienstes _7  (Nr. 51);  67-71.
Hosier, C. R. (1961); Low-level inversion frequency in  the con-
      tiguous United States; Mo. Wea. Rev.  89,  319-339.
Howard, L. (1818);  The Climate of London, Tst.  ed.  (2nd.  ed.
      1833,  3 vols. )
Huff,  F. A. ,  and  Chagnon, S. A. (1960);  Distribution of  excessive
      rainfall amounts  over an urban area. Journ. Geophys. Res.
      _65,  3759-3765.
Hull,  B. B. (1957);  Once-in-a-hundred-year rainstorm,  Washing-
      ton, D. C.  4 September 1939; Weatherwise 10, 128-131, 139.
Katz, M. (1956);  City planning, industrial plant  location, and air
      pollution; Sect. 2, Magill, P. L. ,  etc, al.  , Air Pollution
      Handbook,  McGraw Hill Book Co.
Katz, M. (1961);  Some aspects of the  physical and chemical nature
      of air pollution; "Air  Pollution" WHO Monogr. Ser.  46,
      pp. 97-158.
Kienle, J.  von (1952); Ein stadtgebundener Schneefall in Mann-
      heim; Meteorol.  Rundschau 5,  132-133.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CITY AIR   BETTER OR WORSE                             21

Kline, D. B. ,  and Brier, G. W. (1961); Some experiments on the
      measurement of natural ice nuclei; Me. Wea.  Rev. 89,
      263-272.
Kratzer, A.  (1956); Das Stadtklims, 2nd ed. , Die Wissenschaft
      Bd. 90, Braunschweig,  184 pp.
Krupins, A. P. , Tyukov, D. M. , and Ponomareva, A. M.  (1954).
      Effect of atmospheric pollution on the bactericidal effective-
      ness of solar radiation,  (translated title); Gigiena i
      Santiariya,  No. 8, 15-18.
Landsberg, H. (1938); Atmospheric condensation nuclei,  Erg.
      Kosm.  Physik, _3, 155-252.
Landsberg, H. E.  (1956); The  climate  of towns; in:  Man's Role
      in Changing the Face of  the Earth,  Univ. of Chicago Press,
      584-606.
Landsberg, H.E.  (1958); Physical Climatology; 2nd ed.  Gray
      Printing Co. 446 pp.
Lenshin, V. T. (1958); Sulfurous anhydride  in the atmospheric
      air of Leningrad;  Gigiena i Sanitariya 23,  No.  8,  57-59.
McDonald, J. F.  (1961); Mean atmospheric residence times for
      particulate air pollutants; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 42,
      664-665.
Mitchell, J. M. , Jr.  (1953); On the  causes of instrumentally ob-
      served secular temperature trends; J. Meteorol.  10,  244-
      261.
Muhleisen, R. (1959); Elektrische Ladungen an Aerosol-. Dunst-
      und Nebelteilchen; Ber.  d. DT.  Wetterdianstes 7 (Nr.  51),
      62-66.                                         ~
Murray, M.  (1957); Snowfall in Leicestershire 18-19 February
      1957; Weather  1J2, 329-330.
Neiburger, M. (1955a);  Tracer test of the accuracy  of trajector-
      ies computed from observed winds in the Los Angeles area;
      Air Pollut. Foundat.  Rep. No. 7, 55 pp.
Neiburger, M. (1955b);  Visibility trends in Los Angeles; Air
      Pollut. Foundat.  Rep. No. 11, 45 pp.
Neiburger, M. (1959); Meteorological aspects of oxidation type
      air pollution; in:  The Atmosphere and the Sea in Motion,
      New York,  Rockefeller Inst.  Press and Oxford University
      Press,  158-169.
Okita, T. (1960); Estimation of air  flow from observation of rime
      ice; J.  Meteorol.  Soc. of Japan,  Ser II, 38,  207-209.
Potter,  J.  G.  (1961); Changes in seasonal snowfall in cities;
      Canad.  Geographer _5, 37-42.
Potter,  J.  G.  (1961); Areal variation of snowfall in metropolitan
      Toronto; Meteorol. Branch-Sept, of Transp. -Canada, CIR-
      3431, TEC-342, 7 pp.
Reiter,  R.  (1960);  Meteorobiologie  und Elektrizitat der Atmos-
      phare.  Probl. d. Biokl. Ed. 6) Akad. Verlagsges Leipzig
      1960, 424 pp.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
22                       LANDSBERG

Roach, W. T. (1961); Some aircraft observations of fluxes of
      solar radiation in the atmosphere; Qu. Journ.  R.  Meteorol.
      Sec.  _8_7,  346-363
Semonin,  R.  C. ,  and Stout, G. E. (1961); Atmospheric particu-
      lates in precipitation physics; 111.  State Water Survey,
      Meteorol. Lab., Final Rep. Nat'l.'Sci. Found G-6352,
      18 pp.
Steinhauser,  F. (1959); Der Kohlenoxyd-Gehalt der Lufts in Wien
      and  seine Abbangigkeit von verschiedenen Faktoren; Ber.
      d. Dt.  Wetterdienstes _7 (Nr. 51);  53-61.
Steinhauser,  F. ,  Eckel, O. ,~and Sauberer,  F.  (1955,  1957,
      1959); Klima und Bioklima von Wien; Wetter und Leben,
      Pt.  I    Sonderheft  3   Vol.  T_>  12° PP-
      Pt.  II   Sonderheft  5   Vol. 1),  134 pp.
      Pt.  Ill   Sonderheft  7   Vol. Tl, 136 pp.
Sundberg, A. (1950); Local climatological studies of the temper-
      ature conditions in an urban area; Tellus 2, 222-232.
Sundberg, A. (1951); Climatological studies  in Uppsala,  with
      special regard to the temperature conditions in the urban
      area.   Uppsala Univ. Geog. Inst. , Geographies No. 22.
U. S.  Bureau of the Census (1961); United States Census of Popu-
      lation,  United States Summary, Number of Inhabitants,
      Final Report PC(1),  Washington,  140 pp.
Wanta, R.  C. ,  Moreland,  W.  B. , and Heggestad, H.E.  (1961);
      Tropospheric  ozone:  an air pollution  problem arising in
      the Washington, D. C. , metropolitan area;  Mo. Wea.  Rev.
      89_,  289-296.
Weiss, E., and Frenzel,  J. W.  (1956);  Untersuchungen von
      Luftverunreinigungen durch Rauch-und Industriegase im
      Raum von Linz; Wetter und Leben 8, 131-147.
World Health Organization (1961); Air Pollution,  Monogr. Series
      46,  Columbia  Univ.  Press,  New York, 442 pp.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                  Air Pollution Studies in the Netherlands

                                  F. H. SCHMIDT, Royal Netherlands
                                  Meteorological Institute
Summary
     A study is made of the increase in concentration of atmospheric pollution at the
earth's surface in large cities and industrial areas when stability increases.  By means
of some simplifying assumptions, it is shown theoretically that when stability increases
discontinuously the increase in concentration of pollution initially is proportional to time
and for extended periods of stability is proportional to the square root of the time. A
linear increase of concentration with time is also found with a slow increase of stability.
The theory is illustrated numerically by data  from measurements obtained in three case
studies. The empirical data are reasonably well represented by theoretical formulas.
       Air pollution began to be felt as a problem in the Nether-
lands almost immediately after the second World War, when the
industrialization of the  country progressed rapidly.  Its harmful
effects,  even in a flat and windy country like the Netherlands,
were experienced for the first time  in an area northeast of big
steelworks to the west of Amsterdam when severe damage was
done to flower  estates.   Figure 1 shows the total damage observed
at the end of  summer,  expressed   in a relative measure; the
Sutton pattern  can be recognized clearly.   The curves are less
flat  than they should be according  to  theory,  because the wind
direction was,  of course, not constant during the whole season.
The problem has been solved, more  or  less,  since the steel-
works built a  150-meter chimney.

       At the  same time  the ever-increasing industrialization in
and  around the second largest harbour of the world, (New York
being the largest)  Rotterdam, just to the south of one  of the most
important horticultural districts of the country,  became more
and  more a nuisance.  In this case we could not  attribute any
damage to  one  special industry but had to consider the integrated
effect  of a  large  number of sources  at various heights; this led
us automatically to a study of the problems that  are specific  for
the topic of this symposium.

       We considered several aspects of the behaviour of pollu-
tion in such an area; special attention has been given to the role
of atmospheric stability in some cases.  Three examples  are
given in this paper and  are  illustrated with some figures.

       First we tried to get  an idea of what happens to  concentra-
                                  23

-------
 24
                           SCHMIDT
        Figure 1. Patterns of pollutant damage to vegetation near Amsterdam.

tions in an urban area when stability in that area increases sud-
denly.   In such cases, at least in the dangerous ones, there is
generally little or no wind and the pollution balance  is almost  ex-
clusively governed by the production of pollution and its upward
transportation by turbulence.
      Assuming equilibrium during  the period preceding the
stability increase,  including the effect of advection into the ver-
tical transport,  which is of course physically not correct, and
taking an area so large and homogeneously contaminated that the
variations of concentration in horizontal directions may be ig-
nored, another relatively rough approximation, we get equations
that can be solved by Laplace transform (see Bouman and
Schmidt,  1961).  We are interested in the variation  of ground
concentration with  time  after the  moment  stability increases sud-

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
AIR POLLUTION STUDIES IN THE NETHERLANDS
25
denly.  The result is that after a short period, during which only
the sources in ground level   automobiles for example   add to
the ground concentration, all sources  start to increase, resulting
in an increase of that concentration proportional with the square
root of time.

      The result has been tested successfully in  a number of
cases.  Figure 2 shows as an example the SO2 measurements
made in the centre of London during the great smog of December
1952.  The theory provides a possibility within certain limits to
forecast to what level concentrations may rise under such cir-
cumstances.
5  05

8  04
o*
   Q3


   0.2
   O.t
       December
 Figure 2. Measured concentrations of S02 in London during smog episode, December 1952.

      Secondly the hourly observations of the dust content of the
air,  made in the centre of Rotterdam and measured by the well-
known filter method, have been analysed harmonically.  General-
ly, the dust content  over the day, averaged for instance for every
month of the year, is such that we find the curve reaches  a pro-
nounced maximum in the morning and more or less  flattens for
the rest of the day.  It  may be assumed,  therefore,  that it is
especially the morning part of the curve  that determines the har-
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
26
SCHMIDT
monic components.  It is found that the first harmonic generally
has the largest amplitude of all.
      If stability plays a role in the daily variation of the dust
content of the air,  its influence may be assumed to appear espe-
cially in the first harmonic.  If the morning observations  are
assumed the most  important ones,  therefore, through the year
we may expect a shift of the time at which the first harmonic
shows its maximum.
      Figure 3 shows the time of sunrise and the times at which
the first harmonic  and the combination of the second and the third
harmonics obtain maximum values.  It seems that the part of the
morning maximum that is due to stability occurs about 1 hour
after  sunrise.
   JAN    FEB    MAR   APR    MAY   JUNE    JULY   AUG    SEPT   OCT    NO
 Figure 3. Harmonic component patterns based on hourly dustfall observations in Rotter-
         dam.

      Finally,  if the first harmonic depends mainly on stability,
its relative amplitude, i.e., its  contribution to the total morning
maximum,  may be assumed to depend on cloudiness.  High values
of cloudiness result  in small variations in stability, and vice
versa.  This is even more true with respect to precipitation.
Apart from its direct connection with cloudiness,  precipitation
wets the earth's surface and thereby reduces the daily variation

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
AIR POLLUTION STUDIES IN THE NETHERLANDS
27
in stability.  In Figure 4 the total monthly amount of precipitation
is plotted against the amplitude of the first harmonic over the
total morning amplitude; the effect of precipitation can be observ-
ed clearly.
   JAN    FEB    MAR   APR   MAY   JUNE    JULY   AUG   SEPT   OCT   HOY   DEC
          Figure 4. Relationship of harmonic pattern to precipitation data.
      Cities influence the circulation, as do large industries that
have a considerable heat output.  It was observed that in Vlaar-
dingen, a small town west of Rotterdam, the volatile products of
the Shell  refineries south of it could be smelled during situations
with westerly winds.  This could  only be explained by assuming
a vertical circulation due to the heating of the atmosphere over
the Refineries,  air rising over them,  and eventually descending
over the town.
      In order to  detect this circulation,  wind observations were
made around the Shell complex during situations with westerly
winds,  and the  divergence was determined.

      Figure 5  shows the  divergence pattern that has been com-
puted from these  observations,  translated into vertical velocities
in centimeters  per second, based on the  assumption that the  di-
vergence pattern  is constant between the ground and 100 meters,
the maximum height of the chimney stacks.   The figure confirms
that air rises over the region with largest heat  output and de-
scends to the north of the refineries.  This  result was  based on a
relatively small number of observations  (17); however,  direct
measurements  of the vertical motions with pilot balloons have
given similar results.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
28
                            SCHMIDT
-10
                                          0       Vz in cm/sec.
   Figure 5. Computed wind divergence over industrial complex near Vlaardingen during
          westerly winds.

                          BIBLIOGRAPHY

 F. H.  Schmidt,  1957 :  On the diffusion of stack gases in the at-
                         mosphere; Koninklijk Nederlands Meteor-
                         ological Institute,  Mededelingen en
                         Verhandelingen 68.

 F. H.  Schmidt,  1960 :  On the dependence on stability of the para-
                         meters in Button's diffusion formula;
                         Beitrage zur Physik der Atmosphare 33,
                         p. 112.
                                 SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
AIR POLLUTION STUDIES IN THE NETHERLANDS           29

D. J. Bouman and F,  H. Schmidt,  1961 :   On the growth of ground
                       concentrations of atmospheric pollution in
                       cities during stable atmospheric condi-
                       tions;  Beitrage zur Physik der
                       Atmosphare 33, p.  215.
                          DISCUSSION

      FROM THE FLOOR: Plant damage around the steel mill,
was it sulfur dioxide damage or chloride damage?

      DR. SCHMIDT:  Chloride.

      MR. ROBINSON:  In the diurnal stability pattern did you
include a diurnal wind  factor, also?
      DR. SCHMIDT:  No, it is very small.  There may be an
influence of land or sea breeze,  even at Rotterdam,  although it is
30 kilometers from the city.

      We didn't have a measure for the daily variation of
stability.  We just looked at pollution and said,  "Well, pollution
shows a daily variation.   And, can we understand that by ascrib-
ing it to the daily variation of stability. "  At the present time we
do not have the  means  in the  Netherlands to measure  stability
correctly.  We  have radiosonde  observations, but it is hardly
possible to say  something about  stability in the lower 100 or 200
meters with the observations as they are confined to two per day.
What we did was just look at  the daily variation of pollution,
taking that daily variation as a measure of the daily variation of
stability, then compare that daily variation of pollution with the
amount of rain,  for instance,  the amount of rain giving an
indication of the cloudiness,  not a very exact indication, but
giving an indication. And when we did that we found  a connection
between the two that we think we can  understand.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                   Recent Developments in the Chemistry
                                   of Urban Atmospheres

                                   JAMES P. LODGE, Jr., National Center
                                   for Atmospheric Research
 Summary
     The role of meterolog ica I factors in the transport of air pollutants is widely known.
 The effect of air pollutants upon weather and climate, however, has received far less at-
 tention.  Probably the substance that has been studied most is carbon dioxide. It is
 generally agreed that the concentration of this compound in the earth's atmosphere has
 increased since the turn of the century, though the exact amount  of increase is still un-
 settled.  There is still less agreement on the resulting effect on  the global heat balance.
 Urban air contains many more condensation nuclei than country air, and numerous un-
 supported statements have related this fact to smog formation. A better case can be
 made for an effect of sulfur dioxide, which is absorbed by fog droplets and is partially
 oxidized to sulfuric acid. This process should have a profound effect on fog persistence.
 Numerous other substances can be cited that must have some sort of modifying effect
 upon the urban microclimate.
       What I would like  to talk about has been in some measure
preempted by Dr.  Landsberg,  but I am going to go over it again
because perhaps stated  from the viewpoint of a chemist it will be
received with a little different emphasis.   I want to talk about the
atmospheric effects of chemical pollutants.
       Considerable work has been done on the  effect of the atmos-
phere on its  load of chemical species.   Some of this work has
been of good quality, and some very poor, but nonetheless there
has been substantial continuing research effort on the atmospheric
transport of  pollutants and on the changes undergone  by pollutants
as  they are being carried.   On the other hand,  with one or two
rather small exceptions astonishingly little active work has been
done on the effect of chemical  species,  as such, on the weather,
microclimate and climate of the urban area.

       Certainly the best-known and most-studied effect is the so-
called greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide; however,  the exact
magnitude  of this effect  still appears,  so far as I can tell from
current literature,  to be under debate.

       The amount of increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
over the past 60 years or so is not  known.   In  1961 we  still do not
have sufficiently accurate methods  of measuring carbon dioxide to
permit determination of this increase over a short period.  The
severity of the need for  such methods was brought to my attention
just a few days  ago by a colleague who  is trying to measure carbon
                                  31

-------
32                          LODGE

dioxide at Point Barrow.  He needs a method or device that will
measure the very small gradients we would expect to find in the
proximity of sinks, i. e. ,  a device that might measure hundredths
of a part per million carbon dioxide.   I did not unduly encourage
him, since this calls for an accuracy of roughly one in  30, 000,
which is  very  good accuracy for the best-established techniques
of quantitative analysis of substances much easier to determine
than carbon dioxide.
      It has frequently been stated and was reiterated by Dr.
Landsberg that cities are a source of very large numbers of con-
densation nuclei.  The exact nature of their effect remains un-
demonstrated.  Some very careful experiments concerning the
nature of condensation nuclei formation in flames have  been
made; however, to my knowledge, only the rate of production of
condensation nuclei by individual fuels has been demonstrated.
Many of the condensation nuclei produced by human activity are
so small they  simply are not activated in the  natural atmosphere.

      Certain  other individual species present in the particulate
state in urban air have  a substantial effect on fog persistence.
For example,  the output of sulfur dioxide  reflected in an increase
in the amount  of sulfur  trioxide or sulfuric acid has  a substantial
effect on fog persistence,  as is now clearly demonstrated by work
in London and elsewhere.   Be-e-ause of the extremely hygroscopic
nature of sulfuric acid, there can be no question whatever that the
presence of sulfur dioxide  does result in an increase in the  sul-
furic acid content of the air, and thereby frequently stabilizes and
perpetuates fogs  at conditions well below water saturation.

      There is still another effect of city gases such as sulfur
dioxide,  and this is the conversion of  certain other species  to
sulfates and nitrates, and the like.  For example, it has been
shown by Jung that the one place large amounts of particulate
nitrate are found in the air  seems to be over coastal cities.   In
these cities salt fresh from the  sea is brought into contact with
oxides of nitrogen.  Chemically this is very fascinating.  The
sulfates present in urban air seem to  be ammonium sulfate and
calcium sulfate.  Sulfur dioxide is  converted to sulfuric acid and
thence to sulfate  and seems in that state to tie up primarily with
ammonia.  Since lime and ammonia are the most active materials,
they present the finest  chance for reaction; nitrogen dioxide then
comes along but must be contented to  react with the only thing
left, sodium chloride,  which is  less favorable for reaction.   The
sulfur dioxide has grabbed off everything else.

      In  a very clean atmosphere,  if the sulfur dioxide were
forced to react with the sodium chloride because of the absence  of
other good surfaces,  we would have an interesting situation.


                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CHEMISTRY OF URBAN ATMOSPHERES                     33

According to the data that I can find,  the transition humidity for
sodium chloride,  i. e. ,  the relative humidity at about room tem-
perature at which it undergoes transition from a solid particle to
a liquid drop, is about  74 percent.  On the other hand,  the cor-
responding transition humidity for sodium sulfate decahydrate,
which is certainly the species that would be present under these
conditions, is 93 percent.  This would have a profound effect on
fog persistence under these conditions.
      I am not able to find the transition humidity for sodium
nitrate in the literature; however, this would be  very interesting
since these chemical reactions do result in a shift in the relative
humidity at which haze formation is initiated.  This is  an effect
that to my knowledge has not really been investigated in relation
to our present knowledge.

      Another species put into the air of cities in quantity is soot.
I find it very fascinating that soot is put  out and we have talked
about sootfall, and so forth,  and yet nobody has tied this in with
the series of experiments done by, among others,  Dr.  Florence
Van Straten.  These  experiments indicate at least  a good possi-
bility of the initiation of convective activity by heat absorbed by
clouds of soot.
      Without passing for the  moment on the validity of Dr.  Van
Straten's  experiments,  which I am not competent to assess and
which I think no one else has fully assessed as yet, this certainly
presents another source of possible meteorological change from
pollutants.
      Another interesting bit of recent knowledge is the fact that
a number of species, most particularly metallurgical fumes,
seem quite active as freezing nuclei at reasonably elevated tem-
peratures; and still more recent knowledge,  completely unassim-
ilated as yet, that certain organic compounds are extremely ac-
tive in promoting freezing of supercooled water.
      Head in Australia demonstrated freezing on the  surfaces
of some fairly esoteric  organic compounds at temperatures as
warm as -2. 5°.  I will say, lest I frighten anyone, that this was
under highly unrealistic conditions.  Attempts to get  classical-
type cold-box nucleation by the same  species have not been suc-
cessful as yet.  Head's  work certainly indicates  the possibility
that cities can act as rather potent sources of freezing nuclei,
and that this may, in fact,  affect  precipitation patterns over
cities.

      Another substance briefly mentioned by Dr.  Landsberg, and
certainly on a large scale neglected as a pollutant, is water vapor.
Not too long ago, while  I was  still working here at Taft Center, I

SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
34                          LODGE

had a visitor who wanted to know how to remove his chief prob-
lem pollutant, which was water vapor.  His  stacks discharge
quantities of water vapor just upwind of a major highway, and
under these conditions you can have a severe pollution problem
from water.  There is, furthermore,  the possibility already
raised by Dr. Landsberg that this added water has an impact upon
the total water balance of the city,  in terms of increasing precip-
itation.
      Finally, we have a rather more subtle effect of chemical
species on the weather, a secondary effect.  I can point out areas
such as that region between the City of Houston, Texas,  and the
Gulf,  for example,  which have been thoroughly denuded of vege-
tation by uncontrolled  discharge of pollutants   trees are dead,
grass in many cases is gone.  I think this is an effect that has
been very little thought of, but we have denuded these acres of
ground.  We have reduced them to the bare earth.  Certainly the
effect of this on the heat balance must be great.  No one would
claim that the albedo of bare earth was identical with that of a
grass- and tree-covered expanse.
      In fact, as is well known, Dessens,  working in Africa, has
attempted to  show,  I think with relatively little success,, actual
cloud  formation over a simply large black area of ground.  If he
puts in a little additional heat from  a few burners,  which we fre-
quently  do ourselves, by building a plant in the middle of such a
desert,  then he can get very fine formation of convective clouds.
On one noteworthy occasion Dessens produced a tornado.
      I am not trying to use scare tactics here.  I am merely
pointing out that we can hardly do anything without  upsetting some-
thing in our balance of nature.  We must weigh very carefully
whether the results are worth the upset.
                         DISCUSSION

      DR. MITCHELL: I was, of course,  interested in the allu-
sion you made to the fact  that certain organic compounds might
act as freezing nuclei at as high a temperature  as  -2. 5°,  and I
just wanted to have you clarify,  if you could,  whether the evidence
for this was in context of  the small droplets as  we find them  in
the atmosphere or at larger bulk water masses.  This would be
highly interesting.

      DR. LODGE:  Probably the first publication  on this work
was a brief note in Science, I think this past September 9  by R
B.  Head of Melbourne.  The chemical compound was melted  on  a
microscope slide and allowed to solidify; very small drops were


                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CHEMISTRY OF URBAN ATMOSPHERES                     35

condensed on the solidified compound by chilling the microscope
slide, and then observed for freezing.

      Now the droplets themselves are small.  The number of
active sites is rather  slight, and appears to coincide with some
sort of unidentified lattice falls.  The organic compounds in ques-
tion are pure only to the extent of giving sharp melting points, and
consequently I can't say beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is not
due to some impurity.  This I am planning myself to do a little
work on.  But there was one compound that did nucleate under
these conditions at some times at temperatures as warm  as -2.  5°,
and several above -10°.  Primarily steroids, but  also cholester-
ol,  which is quite active in this as  well as in some other things,
and fluorene derivatives.

      DR. HEWSON:  I would like to  ask Dr.  Lodge what he es-
timates the improvements in the techniques for measuring carbon
dioxide have been since the beginning of the century.

      DR. LODGE:  That's sort of  a  tricky question.  I would say
this:  at best our methods now are very much better, a fine ex-
ample being, on the days  when they are working,    the nondisper-
sive infrared instruments,  such  as those used by Keeling and
Kanwisher,  and others.

      As I know you realize,  there are many days on which these
instruments are not working and our big difficulty is the total lack
of a true referee method which permits calculation from first
principles of what the concentration is that the instruments are
measuring.
      Their reproducibility can be  made very good.  Their ab-
solute accuracy I think is largely unknown.  It is  my opinion that
within a few years there should be  methods that would be  good to
at least a tenth of a  part per million.  I think we are at last be-
ginning to learn a few things about  this,  and I believe that the
accuracy, precision, or discrimination, of the order of a part
per million, necessary to  sense  gradients over water and so on,
can be achieved by simply dodging  the issue and measuring the
gradient itself,  directly,  say, with a concentration cell,  rather
than undertaking to make  two separate determinations and sub-
tract.
      DR. HILST: Dr. Lodge, what  scale of length or area do
you have in mind with regard to the changing of surface conditions
and how this might affect  the  area.   Is it an area of a square mile
or are you thinking of counties,  states, continents?  Or all of it?
      DR. LODGE:  The specific case to which I alluded would be
the area that we all  know  about,  of the order of less than a square
mile, an area which has been denuded simply by chemical action.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
 36                          LODGE

 I am not referring specifically to paving.  I am referring simply
 to the  destruction of vegetation by uncontrolled discharge of pol-
 lutants.
      DR.  HILST:  The effect of  it,  of course, would depend on
 how dynamically or hydrostatically  stable or unstable the atmos-
 phere  reacted.
      DR.  LODGE:  Absolutely.
      FROM THE FLOOR:  In view  of the available methods for
 measuring pollution,  data which  are available from history, and
 what is liable to happen in the future, what is your view on  the
 best indicator of trends of pollution, manmade pollution?

      DR.  LODGE: As things stand, and assuming that we  don't
 learn a tremendous amount more about air cleaning than seems
 likely, I would stick by my  statement of some years ago that car-
 bon dioxide was probably the best index.   Because it  is produced
 in all human activity.        ,
                        REFERENCES

Lodge, J. P. ,  Ed. , Atmospheric Chemistry of Chlorine and Sul-
      fur Compounds,  NAS-NRC,  Publ. No. 652,  1959, page 47.
Van Straten,  Dr. Florence, U.S.  Naval Res.  Lab. Rep.  5235,
      Washington, D. C. ,  25 pp.  1958.
Head, R.  B. ,  (1961), Nature,  191,  1058.
Dessens,  H. ,  (1960), in H. Weichmann,  Physics of Precipitation,
      NAS-NRC Publ.  No.  746, pp 396-401.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                   A ClimatologicaI Evaluation of
                                   Precipitation Patterns Over An Urban Area

                                   STANLEY A. CHANGNON, Jr.,
                                   Climatologisl, Illinois State Water Survey*
Summary
     A 13-year measurement program of urban rainfall distribution in a moderate-sized
Illinois municipality is described.  A dense raingage network with one gage per square
mile has been in operation since 1948 in a community of 70,000 population. The month-
ly, seasonal, and annual precipitation patterns derived from the network data are dis-
cussed, and suggestions are offered concerning the possible urban influences on the
patterns. The annual average precipitation pattern is compared with that from a nearby
rural network to help evaluate the apparent urban-affected precipitation pattern obtained
over the urban area. Recommendations are presented for the type of measurement pro-
gram necessary to determine whether urban influences are producing measureable effects
on the amount of precipitation over and downwind from the urban areas.
INTRODUCTION
       Precipitation data from a  dense network of raingages lo-
cated in a moderate-sized urban area in central Illinois  have pro-
duced a 10-year precipitation pattern which suggests the presence
of urban influences.  Statistical tests and theoretical considera-
tions have  been applied to  these findings in hopes of determining
whether the urban influences were responsible for  additional pre-
cipitation on the downwind side of the urban area.   From these
investigations,  conclusions as to other possible  causes or explan-
ations of the additional  downwind precipitation are  drawn,  and
suggestions are  offered concerning urban precipitation measure-
ment programs.
PREVIOUS FINDINGS
      Before the Illinois study is discussed, it is appropriate to
report  briefly  on some of the earlier findings.  Undoubtedly,  the
most recent comprehensive resume of findings relating to urban
effects on precipitation  is the one by Dr.  Landsberg. *  Dr. Lands-
berg presented information on the various urban conditions affect-
ing precipitation conditions as well as  information on the observed
precipitation increases  in urban areas.  He refers to other pub-
lications which show that urban areas, as opposed to  rural areas,
*Read by Glenn E. Stout for Stanley A. Changnon, Jr.

                                  37

-------
 38                        CHANGNON

 have been noted to have (1) more rainy days, (2) more thunder-
 storm days,  and (3) more total precipitation.  Various  studies ot
 European and North American conditions have shown that in urban
 areas precipitation can be expected to range from 5 to 10 percent
 above that in nearby rural areas.   The number of  days  of light
 rain and of thunderstorms were reported to average from  11 to 18
 percent more in urban areas than in nearby rural  areas.
      Three factors are listed as principal causes  of urban-
 induced increases in precipitation.  These urban factors are addi-
 tional condensation nuclei,  additional water vapor, and turbulence
 resulting from thermal convection and increased surface rough-
 ness.  Additional nuclei are designated as playing a more  im-
 portant role in the colder half-year when frontal precipitation in
 the central United States is most frequent.  Because of this, Dr.
 Landsberg stated that the urban effect on precipitation is most
 pronounced in the colder half-year of humid continental climates.
DESCRIPTION OF ILLINOIS PROJECT
      As so often occurs in science,  a project started for one
purpose eventually finds another and often an equally useful scien-
tific objective.  Such is the case with our urban precipitation
project in Illinois.
      In late 1948, the Illinois State Water Survey,  in collabora-
tion with-the University of Illinois College of Engineering,  in-
stalled nine recording raingages in Champaign-Urbana,  Illinois.
The locations of these gages, numbers 1 through 9,  are shown in
Figure I.   These were installed to furnish data for a hydrologic
study of rainfall-runoff relationships on an urban watershed lo-
cated in these adjoining communities.    At that time, two other
recording raingages, numbers 11 and 12, were already in  opera-
tion in the urban area, and by 1950 a twelfth gage, number  10 on
the map (Figure 1),  was installed.  Data collection and routine
analysis have been continuous since these 12  gages were installed.
The data collected in the 1950-1959 period have  been carefully
re-analyzed and the  results are used as a basis  for the urban
precipitation study.  Extreme care was  exercised in  the installa-
tion of these gages in an effort to obtain comparable exposures,
and since  installation, the gages have had regular maintenance
and servicing by one technician.  Thus within normal performance
limitations, the data from this network are considered to be of
exceptional quality.

      In many respects Champaign-Urbana,  which is about  130
miles south of Chicago in east central Illinois,  is in a uniauelv
suitable location for evaluating urban influences on precipitation

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62.5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                        39

These adjoining cities,  which are actually a single urban area,
lie in an exceptionally flat featureless glacial plain with no sig-
nificant changes in relief within 100 miles.  The entire surround-
ing area also is devoid of any large-sized water bodies.  The
rural land is devoted to extensive cash-grain farming, chiefly
corn and soybeans.  The nearest urban communities with appre-
ciable industrial development are more than 40 miles away. Dur-
ing the  1950-59 period, a complex of petro-chemical industries
was built in a rural area 23 miles  south of Champaign-Urbana.
In general,  it is believed that no natural or cultural factors that
might significantly affect the distribution of precipitation exist in
the region outside the urban area.
      The twin cities function basically as a university-residential
area.  There are a few local industrial and heating plants as
shown on Figure 1, but these  are of minor importance and are
not heavy industries.  During the 1950-59 decade,  the urban area
has undergone growth.  The corporate area was 9. 8  square miles
in 1950 and was 11. 2 square miles by 1959; therefore, the  rain-
gage  density has been about 1 gage per square mile.   The urban
population increased from 62, 000 in 1950 to nearly 77, 000  in
1959.  As shown in Figure 1,  the urban area is rectangular with
the longer dimension of 5 miles lying east-west.  The mean north-
south width is 2. 5 miles.  Impervious surfaces have been com-
puted to be  38 percent of the total corporate area.  ^   Until recent
years,  most of the urban area including the University of Illinois
campus had an extensive tree growth but  this has been greatly re-
duced by tree diseases. The  only other local change of any pos-
sible significance was the addition in 1957 of a soybean processing
plant in the  vicinity of gage 4  (Figure 1).
      In order  to have a measure of precipitation for the surround-
ing rural area,  records from three raingages, which were in op-
eration during  most of the 10-year period,  were employed.  These
gages, as shown on Figure  1, are at Rising, a village 3 miles
west-northwest of the urban area; at the University of Illinois
Airport, 3.  5 miles south of the urban area; and at St. Joseph,
about 7 miles  east  of the urban area.  These are all unshielded
recording raingages operated by the Illinois State Water Survey.
Four weather stations in the area (Figure 1) were  operated simul-
taneously during the July 1959 to June 1960 period to obtain de-
tailed surface temperature measurements.
INTRODUCTION TO PROBLEM
      The possibility of the existence of urban effects on the pre-
cipitation distribution in Champaign-Urbana is based on the pre-
mise that these  effects will produce more precipitation in the

SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
  40
                            CHANGNON
• RISING
        URBAN
         BOUNDARY-^
              X
             I	
             I	
r	
  DMW (

   «4

      •5
  CHAMPAIGN
          x«7
     I	1
—i   i  r
  1_J  L_
     .9  L
 URBANA   i
                                 JSCENTRAL

                                                   ST JOSEPH
                   AIRPORT
                                      -KEY-

                               X Principal Sources of Smoke
                                 and Water Vapor
                               Q Weather Station
                               • Recording Raingage
                               0123
                                   SCALE, Miles
                  Figure 1. Champaign - Urbana and Vicinity

 eastern portions of the urban area than elsewhere in the urban
 area.  This is considered valid since most precipitation systems
 and individual cells generally move  from a westerly direction in
 this area. ^'    With  such an average movement it is believed that
 urban effects  on  precipitation would not be realized until the  pre-
 cipitation system had passed over the western portion of the  urban
 area.  Fluctuations in the speed of cell movement,  the stage of
 storm development,  and the  speed and direction of the  surface
 winds would cause urban-affected precipitation  conditions to  max-
 imize at different locations in the eastern half of the urban area,
 or possibly in the rural area east of Urbana.

       Radar studies of precipitation cells  and organized lines of
 precipitation  in this area have  shown that  precipitation cells  and
 lines generally move  at speeds of 10 to 30 mph. ^>  5, 6  ^ an
 average speed of 20 mph and an average cell diameter  of 5
 miles, 6 a  cell moving from the west over the urban area would
 require  30 minutes to pass entirely  across the urban area.  This
 is from the time the  cell's leading edge reaches the western
 boundary until the trailing edge leaves the eastern  edge of Urbana.
 Such a situation would require  urban effects from Champaign
 (west) to act on the cell during the 15 to 20 minutes the cell is
 passing over  Champaign.  Since  the average  life cycle  of a

                                 SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                         41

thunderstorm is on the order of 60 minutes,   this means that
most thundershowers and rainshowers passing over Champaign-
Urbana from the west spend nearly one-half their life cycle under
the possible influence of the city.  These statistics give some
order of magnitude for the  time-space relationship between pre-
cipitation conditions  and this specific urban area.
      If a 10-year ma'ximization of precipitation occurred in the
eastern urban area,  this could be explained by any one of three
possible factors:  first, urban conditions may have produced addi-
tional precipitation (urban  effects);  second, more rain cells may
have formed or maximized naturally over Urbana (natural varia-
tion of precipitation); and third, more sheltered exposures for
the raingages may have existed in the eastern area (variability in
gage exposures).

      Description of the  1950-59 annual and seasonal precipita-
tion patterns and the precipitation patterns displayed by individual
precipitation periods in the 1958-1959 period will be presented,
and from these and other supporting data, explanations will be
offered relating to the three possible causes of  the precipitation
patterns observed.


AVERAGE ANNUAL PRECIPITATION
      Figure 2 shows the average annual precipitation  pattern
      31
                                                      30
         Figure 2. Average annual precipitation for 1950-1959, in inches.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
42                       CHANGNON

based on the data for 1950-1959.  Note that the highest values oc-
curred over the ESE portions of the urban area.  The  entire
urban area is the center of the  region of greatest precipitation
which diminishes in all directions away from the urban area. In
general  the rural to urban relationship is 30  to 34 inches, re-
spectively  and the difference amounts to 12 percent.   This  com-
pares favorably with annual percentage differences of 5 to 10 per-
cent reported by Dr. Landsberg.
     Although not discernible in Figure 2, the average annual
precipitation pattern for 1950-1959 across Missouri, Illinois,
and Indiana had a west-to-east  increase,  as based on First-Order
Station data.  In the area of Champaign-Urbana this west-to-east
increase was at the average rate of one inch per 20 miles; this
indicates that with no urban influence a west-to-east increase of
0. 25 inch should have occurred from the west side of the urban
area to the east side.
     A 10-year precipitation record in a humid continental  cli-
mate can be considered of questionable significance, since it may
represent an abnormal period because of temporal and spatial
precipitation variations. One estimate of the possible validity of
the  maximum in the east urban area was obtained by comparing
long-term records of two urban raingages. Gage 11 in the high
area (Figure 2) has been in operation since 1903,  and gage 12,
with a 10-year average nearly  2 inches lower than gage 11,  has
been in operation since 1930.   The 1930-1959 average annual pre-
cipitation at gage 11  is  37. 3 inches compared to 34. 5 inches at
gage 12.  The  30-year average annual difference of 2. 8 inches is
in the same order of magnitude as that shown in Figure 2, and
thus lends credulence to the 10-year pattern.   The 45-year nor-
mal annual value for gage 11 is 36. 6 inches; therefore, the 34. 4
inches recorded as an  average  for the 1950-1959 period repre-
sents a below-normal departure, which is largely a result of
drought conditions in 1952-1955. 7

      The validity of the pattern shown in Figure 2 also was in-
vestigated by inspecting the frequency distribution of the  annual
ranks based on the annual totals of each of the 12 urban gages.
The 12 values  in each year were ranked from high (first) to  low
(twelfth), and the rank frequencies for the 10  years were then in-
spected.  This was used to determine whether the areas of high
and low average precipitation were a result of extremes in just a
few of the 10 years.  The rank frequencies for the  12  gages  and
an average rank determined for each gage are given in Table 1.
The 6 gages located in the east half of the urban area  had 25 of
the  first, second,  or third ranks, and this total is  10  more  than
would be expected if the ranks  were normally distributed among
all  12 gages.  There was a distinct absence of low ranks  (tenth,

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT  A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS
                                                             43
                           TABLE  1
 NUMBER OF TIMES EACH GAGE ACHIEVED VARIOUS RANKS
     BASED ON ANNUAL TOTALS AT EACH URBAN GAGE
                       1950-1959 PERIOD
                      Distribution of rank by gage number
Ranks
1-2-3
4-5-6
7-8-9
10-11-12
2
1
4
3
2
3
1
2
6
1
4
1
2
0
7
5
1
2
3
4
6
1
4
3
2
7
0
0
5
5
8a
2
1
4
3
_ŁŁ
2
5
3
0
10a
6
3
0
1
ii!
8
2
0
0
12a
5
2
1
2
ll
2
3
2
3
Average Rank   6911  10  5   12  8    3     2
                                                    1     4    7

       Indicates gages located in the east half of the urban area.
eleventh, or twelfth) among the six easternmost gages.  Only nine
of these low ranks were recorded, whereas 15 would normally be
distributed in the east.  Also four of the six easternmost gages had
the highest average ranks.   These data support the climatological
validity of the annual pattern shown in Figure 2 and indicate that
this annual maximization in the east was a repetitive process in
                        60
                             55
    70
  Figure 3. Total number of 30-minute to 24-hour amounts  Ł 2-year recurrence value,
         1950-1959
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
 44                       CHANGNON
 most years.  Either gage 10 or 11 ranked first or second in 7 of
 the 10 years.  In two of the remaining three years,  gages 8 and 9
 achieved rank one.  In only one year,  1959,  did the maximum pre-
 cipitation and highest  ranks occur on the west side of the cities.
      The possibility that the 10-year annual pattern might be a
 derivative of the frequent occurrence of excessive rainstorms in
 Urbana was also investigated.   In Figure 3 the urban  distribution
 of storms in 1950-1959 with recurrence intervals equal to or
 greater than 2 years and with durations ranging from 30 minutes
 to 24 hours is shown. 8  The greatest frequency of such storms
 was in the southwestern urban area and the lowest in  the eastern
 area, indicating that the average annual precipitation maximum in
 the east  urban area was not derived from repeated occurrences
 of excessive rainstorms in that area.
      Several studies  in Europe have shown that an urban area,
 through urban influences, experiences  more thunderstorms than
 nearby rural areas. *-   An examination of the records from the
 Airport weather station and the Central weather station (Figure 1)
 revealed that during a 5-year period of comparable records for
 the hours between 0700 and 1800 CST the urban station recorded
 on the average three more thunderstorm days per year than the
 Airport station.  The  urban average annual 5-year value was 45
 thunderstorm days, which is 2 days less than the normal, based
 on 54 years of record.   This finding tends to corroborate the
 belief that urban effects produced by Champaign-Urbana influence
 precipitation systems  passing and developing over the cities.

      Other investigators have analyzed data on the frequency of
 days with precipitation and concluded that an urban effect exists.
A European study revealed Munich had 11 percent more days with
precipitation in  the range of 0. 004-0. 2  inch than the surrounding
 country. 1   An urban increase  of 12 to  18 percent in these light
rains was found in the  Ruhr region of Germany. *•   In  Illinois a
comparison of 8 years of records showed that  the mean  annual
number of days  with light precipitation (0. 004-0. 24 inch) was 69
at the Airport gage (Figure 1), compared with 78  at urban gage
 11.   This is an increase of 13 percent,  which compares favorably
with the percentages noted in Europe.   For days with  precipita-
tion of 0. 25 inch or more,  there was no significant difference be-
tween the average for  the  Airport (41 days) and that for  gage 11
(42  days).
AVERAGE SEASONAL PRECIPITATION
      In Figure 4 the four seasonal average isohyetal patterns
are portrayed.  Maximization of precipitation over the eastern
half of the urban area is evident in all four seasons.  In Table 2

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS
                                                              45
the values considered the best approximations of the rural or un-
modified urban precipitation and those best representing the mod-
ified urban precipitation are shown.  These data reveal that the
greatest percentage excess in the urban area occurs during the
colder seasons; this agrees with Landsberg's findings for Tulsa.
The least excess occurs during  the summer.

      The  30-year average seasonal values for gages 11 and 12
1
    Figure 4. Average seasonal precipitation patterns for 1950-1959 in Champaign-
           Urbana and Vicinity.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
46
   CHANGNON

    TABLE 2
COMPARISON OF  AVERAGE SEASONAL PRECIPITATION FROM
           RURAL AND UNMODIFIED URBAN AREAS
         WITH THAT FROM MODIFIED URBAN AREA
                          1950-1959

                                         Season
Rural and unmodified,
urban precipitation,  in.

Modified urban
precipitation,  in.

Difference between rural
and urban-modified,  in.

Percentage excess in
modified urban area
Winter
5. 25
6. 25
1. 00
16
Spring
8. 25
9. 50
1. 25
13
Summer
10. 25
11. 00
0. 75
7
Fall
6.25
7. 25
1. 00
14
                          TABLE 3

   COMPARISON OF AVERAGE SEASONAL PRECIPITATION
          AMOUNTS AT GAGES 11 AND 12 BASED ON
        30-YEAR AND 10-YEAR PERIODS OF RECORD
                             Seasonal precipitation,  in.
1930-1959 Period
 Gage 11 average
 Gage 12 average
 Difference, 11-12

1950-1959 Period
 Gage 11 average
 Gage 12 average
 Difference, 11-12
Winter

 6. 55
 5. 43
 1. 12
 6. 47
 5. 63
 0. 84
Spring

 11. 05
 10. 11
 0. 94
 9. 50
 8. 64
 0. 86
Summer

 11.05
 10. 65
  0. 40
 11.08
 11. 16
 -0. 08
Fall

8. 67
8. 17
0.50
7.31
7.21
0. 10
are shown in Table 3.  Gage 12 represents a more rural location
than gage 11 in the urban modified area.  The  differences between
these two gages, based on data for the 1950-1959 period  are
shown also in Table 3.  In general,  the average seasonal values

                             SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                        47

for both gages,  based on the more reliable long-term record,
compare favorably with those based on data for 1950-1959.  Only
the 1950-1959 spring and fall averages are lower than the 30-year
values. A comparison of the differences between the values from
the two gages reveals that seasonal differences based on the two
periods of record are remarkably similar.  These findings  tend
to substantiate the fact that although the 1950-1959 precipitation
was somewhat below normal at a  point,  the variations shown be-
tween points may be  representative of those expected over a
longer and, climatologically, a more reliable period of time.
      Winter    The winter precipitation pattern (Figure 4) re-
veals a condition not found in the  other three seasons. The  east
side urban area high extends to the east into the rural area, in-
dicating that if urban influences do produce additional winter pre-
cipitation the resultant greater precipitation is prolongated  in
time and continues over a greater distance than in the other sea-
sons.  This could be explained partially by the greater winter
frequency of more extensive frontal precipitation systems,  and
by the fact that,  in general,  urban nuclei effects on precipitation
systems are most pronounced in the winter season.    The per-
centage excess  listed in Table 2 is highest for winter also.
      Spring   The area of maximum precipitation in spring ap-
parently extends 2 or 3 miles east of Urbana,  but at the St.  Joseph
rural location the average value is much lower than  the urban
maximum values.  A secondary high in the isohyetal pattern ap-
pears at the Airport  gage.  The increase in precipitation across
the urban area is much more rapid over a short distance, from
8. 75 to 9. 5 inches in 1 mile,  than any comparable increase  over
a short distance in winter, although this could be largely a sam-
pling variation.
      Summer   Summer is  the only season in which the east-
side urban high  apparently does not extend into the rural area to
the east.  The presence of a rural average,  at the Airport,
greater than the values in the urban high (Figure 4) strongly sug-
gests that the summer pattern may largely be a result of natural
rainfall variations.  At least,  natural variability, which maxi-
mizes in the summer, helps to confuse the assignment of any  in-
creases to urban influences.   The differences between the aver-
ages of the three rural gages also substantiate this  conclusion.
The Airport value is 11. 49 inches, the  Rising value  is 10. 41
inches, and the  St. Joseph value is 8. 33 inches.  The maximum
difference between these three values exceeds any variation ob-
served between  any of the 12 urban gages.  Landsberg has stated
that urban influences on precipitation have least effect in the sum-
mer, or warm season,   and this  is supported in Table 2,which
reveals that the  lowest seasonal percentages of urban excess

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
48

occurred in the summer.

      Fall
                          CHANGNON
      The fall isohyetal pattern closely resembles the
pattern; however,, changes in precipitation across the
                                                The ur-
sprin
urban area are more gradual in fall than in the spring.
ban excess in fall produces the second greatest seasonal per-
centage, as shown in Table 2.
EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL PRECIPITATION
PERIODS IN 1958-1959
      All precipitation periods in 1958 and 1959 on the urban
area network were analyzed to investigate more  closely the  con-
ditions with which precipitation increases occurred in the east-
ern portion of the urban area. As stated previously, precipita-
tion maximization in the east was considered indicative of pos-
sible urban influence. A precipitation period was defined as a
distinct period of precipitation, with no precipitation 6 hours
before the period began and none for 6 hours after the period
ended.  This delineation of the data yielded 262 precipitation per-
iods in the 2 years.   Each of these precipitation periods was
mapped and isohyetal patterns were drawn.

      The urban area was  divided by two lines, as shown in
Figure 5, so that a western,  eastern,  northern,  or  southern half
1 t
I 	 '
3 I1
^- I1-
~"*5 -~~. !•'
.7^
'<-. -- 1 •"--
-.- _,._!".;-">
u
WEST 1 EAST

_ _ —1
! ,-'
i i__
•9 L
1
I
1
1
— .. _4_NORTH
10?-' SOUTH
	 i
i
	 .1
        Figure 5. Division of urban area for study of precipitation pattern
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                         49

of the urban area could be delineated.  Each directional half had
six raingages.   Based on this form of separation  each isohyetal'
pattern for a precipitation period was classified according to the
half containing the  maximum precipitation.  This half was defined
as the area containing the four highest precipitation values; if no
half had the highest four values, or if the 12 values  showed very
little percentage difference, the pattern was considered "flat" or
without a  definite maximum.  Consequently,  there were five po-
tential pattern classifications.
      A pattern with a maximum in the eastern half  was consid-
ered to be a pattern representative of urban influences  on precip-
itation.  The other four patterns were  considered to represent
natural variations in precipitation.  Therefore,  the  frequency of
periods with east-half maxima was examined statistically in rela-
tion to the frequency of other patterns.  The temporal distribution
of precipitation occurrence, the surface  winds,  and the types of
synoptic situations which occurred with these 262 rain periods
also were studied,  compared,  and evaluated.

      Frequency Distribution.   The annual and seasonal  frequen-
cies of the periods associated with the five different patterns are
shown in Table  4.  If all patterns were normally distributed,  each
of the percentage values in Table 4 would be 20; however, exam-
ination of the percentages for the cases with east-half maximum
values indicated that in each season and for the year this pattern
easily exceeded the normal expected frequency of occurrence. In
the winter and fall  seasons  the percentages are almost  twice those
expected,  and the spring  and annual percentages are more than
50 percent greater than expected.  Only in summer  is the per-
centage near the normal expected value.   Without elaborate sta-
tistical testing, which is  not in  order with this sample size,  it
appears that the high percentage of cases with east-area  max-
ima in the fall  and  winter achieve particular significance because
no other comparable high percentages occurred  in these two sea-
sons.  The high east area percentage in spring is exceeded by the
flat pattern percentages,  and this factor  tends to lessen the sig-
nificance  of the high spring value in the east.
      From these data it  could be concluded that urban  influences
affect one precipitation period in 10, causing a maximization in
the eastern half of the urban area.  Normally, 2 out of  10 precip-
itation periods are  expected to maximize there,  but  on  an annual
basis the  1958-1959 data indicate that 3 of 10 periods maximized
in that urban locality.  In all four seasons more precipitation per-
iods with an east-half maximum occurred than expected.  In both
the fall and winter season,  nearly 4 out of every 10 precipitation
periods maximized in the eastern half of the urban area.


SYMPOSIUM:  AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
50
       CHANGNON

         TABLE  4

     „„  FREQUENCIES Ol
,__ WITH DIFFERENT TYPES
OF"ISOHYETAL PATTERNS

    Area of Maximum Precipitation Values
    '          "   "             None    Total
         West  North  South  (flat)   periods
Winter

Number of periods
Percent of total

Spring

Number of periods
Percent of total

Summer

Number of periods
Percent of total

Fall
Number of periods
Percent of total

Annual

Number of periods
Percent of total
East

  18
  39
                     28
                     34
  18
  24
  22
  37
  86
  33
                             5
                            11
           14
           17
18
24
12
20
49
19
                   1
                   2
 9
12
 4
 7
19
 7
       17
                         15
                         20
                          7
                         12
                         36
                         14
                    14
                    31
             29
             36
                                                 15
                                                 20
                                                 14
                                                 24
                                                 72
                                                 27
                                                          46
                                                          82
                                                          75
                       59
                                                         262
      Hourly Occurrence of Precipitation.   The time of occur-
 rence of precipitation with these various precipitation patterns
 also was investigated.  A count of the number of times each hour
 had precipitation was made for (1) the precipitation periods with
 maxima in the east half and (2) all the remaining precipitation
 periods.  The results of this analysis are shown in Table 5.  If it
 is assumed the data derived from the other four patterns repre-
 sent a near normal hourly distribution of precipitation, any sig-
 nificant deviations from these  distributions exhibited by data  from
 periods maximizing in the east would be of interest.

      In the winter the east-half maximization periods produced
 precipitation most frequently in the hours from 1400 to 2200  CST,
 whereas for all the other periods precipitation was most frequent
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                         51

from 0400 to 1200.  In the spring the periods maximizing in the
east area were most frequent from 1200 to 2000  CST, whereas
the other patterns maximized from 1800 to 0200  CST.  In the
summer, the precipitation periods with east-half maximization
were most frequent at hours  nearly the same as  those with the


                           TABLE  5

        DISTRIBUTION OF HOURS WITH PRECIPITATION
         ASSOCIATED WITH PRECIPITATION PERIODS
                  MAXIMIZING IN THE EAST
       AND WITH ALL OTHER PRECIPITATION PERIODS
                          Percent of total hours
             Winter       Spring	    Summer       Fall        Annual
 2-hr period  East  Other   East  Other   East Other   East Other   East  Other
   (CST)    max. patterns  max. patterns  max. patterns   max. patterns  max. patterns
2400-0200
0200-0400
0400-0600
0600-0800
0800-1000
1000-1200
1200-1400
1400-1600
1600-1800
1800-2000
2000-2200
2200-2400
4 6
5 8
5 9
7 11
8 11
9 9
10 9
11 8
10 8
12 7
12 7
7 7
3
4
5
6
8
11
12
14
13
12
a
4
10
7
7
8
6
7
6
8
9
10
10
12
5
7
5
10
11
13
10
11
8
7
6
6
4
6
6
7
8
9
14
12
8
12
8
6
6
5
7
8
9
10
10
9
9
10
9
8
8
7
7
11
12
8
8
8
8
7
8
8
5
5
5
7
9
10
11
11
10
11
9
7
7
77
8
9
9
8
9
9
8
9
8
9
 other periods of precipitation,  although the other patterns indicated
 a secondary maximization of hourly frequencies from 1800 to
 2000 CST.  In the fall the east-half maximum periods produced
 precipitation most frequently between 1000 and 1400 CST,  com-
 pared with 0600 to 1000 CST for the other patterns.  This  ten-
 dency for a greater frequency later in the day with the east-half
 maximization periods also was characteristic in winter.  On an
 annual basis, the precipitation periods in which a maximization
 occurred on the east half of the urban area produced precipitation
 more frequently during the afternoon and early evening hours,
 whereas the other types of patterns produced precipitation more
 uniformly distributed in time.  The possible causes for these
 peculiar time distributions associated with precipitation periods

 SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
52                        CHANGNON

maximizing in the east will be discussed later.
      The average precipitation periods with an east-half max-
imization were 12. 1 hours in winter,  6. 5 hours in spring, 3. 4
hours in summer, and  10. 1 hours in fall.  The durations for fall
and spring were slightly greater than those based on all the other
patterns.
      Surface Wind Conditions.   It is assumed that two of the
urban influences on precipitation are additional condensation
nuclei and water vapor.   For these factors to influence the mod-
erately  small Champaign-Urbana area most actively, they would
have to  be brought into the precipitation systems west of the
urban area, since most precipitation systems move from the
west. This would give these  two factors more time to act on the
precipitation systems.  To produce an east-area maximization,
the low-level winds prior to the start of precipitation should be
moving  across the urban  area in a  direction which would allow
these influences to be swept downwind into  the clouds to be
affected. ^   Because of the relatively small size of the urban
area under consideration, however, a northeast, east,  or south-
east low-level wind direction would appear to be most favorable
to obtain an upwind movement of atmospheric nuclei and water
vapor for earlier entrainment into  the precipitation-producing
system  entering the urban area from the west.   Winds at and
prior to precipitation are considered in this evaluation rather
than wind conditions during precipitation, because precipitation
tends to remove nuclei from the air thereby lessening this urban
influence. 1 •*•  Previous radar studies have shown that most pre-
cipitation cells in this area move from the  west-southwest, west,
and west-northwest.    To support this supposition on air move-
ment, the precipitation periods with maximization in the east
should be preceded by a greater frequency  of winds from the
northeast, east, and  southeast than are all the  other four types
of precipitation patterns.   Data presented in Table 6 do not sub-
stantiate this assumption,although surface winds are not always

                           TABLE  6
   FREQUENCY OF SURFACE WIND DIRECTIONS PRIOR TO
    AND AT THE BEGINNING OF PRECIPITATION PERIODS

                                    Direction  frequency, %
Total
Precipitation pattern periods N NE E SE S SW W NW
Maximum in east 86 41
All other patterns 176 14
.19 5 12 37 15 7
8 17 12 16 19 95
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                         53

indicative of the low-level wind field.  25 percent of the east-half
maximum periods had surface winds moving from the three
easterly azimuths across the city, whereas of all other periods
37 percent had surface winds from these three  directions.
      These  findings derived from the  surface wind data could be
interpreted as refuting the theory that  urban effects helped to pro-
duce more frequent maximization of precipitation in the east,
because  favorable surface wind directions were not frequent.  At
least,  the surface wind conditions with east-side precipitation
maxima  do not substantiate the theoretical considerations.
      Synoptic Conditions with Precipitation Periods.   The fre-
quency of various synoptic situations associated with the 262
periods is shown in Table 7.  Cold and warm front classifications
include pre-frontal activity related to their presence.   Relating
the cause of  precipitation to various synoptic types is fraught with
problems of  interpretation,  but it is believed that the frequencies
shown in Table 7 are in the right order of magnitude and that it is
safe to use such data to draw limited conclusions. As expected,


                           TABLE  7

           ANNUAL AND SEASONAL FREQUENCIES
           OF SYNOPTIC TYPES ASSOCIATED WITH
         THE PRECIPITATION PERIODS IN 1958-1959
                                     Surface
Season
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Annual
Warm
Front
2
11
3
7
23
Cold
Front
11
20
29
21
81
Stationary
Front
5
15
23
11
54
Occluded
Front
10
10
0
4
24
Low or
Trough
8
13
9
8
38
Upper
Trough
4
2
3
5
14
Air
Mass
6
11
8
3
28
Total
Periods
46
82
75
59
262
cold fronts were the most frequent synoptic condition that pro-
duced precipitation, and stationary fronts were the second most
frequent type.  Surface lows, air mass instability,  occluded
fronts,  and warm fronts had almost equal frequencies.
      In Table 8 the numbers of different synoptic types associated
with the five  different precipitation patterns are expressed as per-
centages of the pattern  total.  Only with the air mass and station-
ary front types is there a semblance of comparable percentages
among the five patterns.  If the difference between the number of N
west and east maximizations (Table 4) is assumed to represent


SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
East
maximum
7
35
20
12
13
1
12
West
maximum
10
33
30
0
15
2
10
South
maximum
0
36
22
0
11
17
14
North
maximum
16
48
21
0
5
5
5
flat
13
17
14
19
21
6
10
54                        CHANGNON

                           TABLE 8

            SYNOPTIC TYPES ASSOCIATED WITH
          FIVE URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS
                              Percent of each pattern total

                     East
Synoptic type

Warm front
Cold front
Stationary front
Occluded front
Surface low-trough
Upper trough
Air mass
urban influences,  then  the significant differences between east
and west synoptic percentages shown in Table 8 could indicate the
synoptic condition most favorable  for maximizations in the east.
The  only difference favoring the east is associated with occluded
fronts.  Comparison of all the percentages in Table 8 reveals
that  the flat pattern percentage for occluded fronts exceeded that
same percentage with east maximizations; however, it could be
concluded that the only significant synoptic condition relating to
maximization in the eastern urban area is the occluded frontal
type.
      For a closer inspection of the synoptic conditions associated
with eastern urban area maximizations, the seasonal frequencies
are portrayed in Table 9,  and these frequencies are also ex-
pressed as percentages of the seasonal totals in Table 7.  It has
been stated previously  in this section that apparently:  (1)  the
seasons during which the east-half storms occurred most fre-
quently were winter, fall,  and spring; and (2) the synoptic type
exhibiting the most  significant difference in percentages, associ-
ated with east-half patterns, was the occluded front.  These
statements are augmented by the data in Table 9.  In winter and
spring 40 percent of the occluded front periods  maximized in the
east, and in the fall, 50 percent.


      Summary.  The  theory that urban effects increase precip-
itation appears to be substantiated by many of the results derived
from the investigation of 262 precipitation periods.   Almost twice
as many periods as expected had a maximum of precipitation in
the eastern half of the area.  Furthermore,  the seasons when
these events occurred most frequently were winter and fall,
closely followed by  spring.  Therefore," the  cases that supported

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------

Season
Winter
Number
Percent of total
seasonal cases
Spring
Number
Percent of total
seasonal cases
Summer
Number
Percent of total
seasonal cases
Fall
Number
Percent of total
seasonal cases
Warm
front

1

50

3

27

0

0

2

29
Cold
front

5

46

8

40

8

27

9

43
Stationary
front

3

60

3

25

7

30

4

36
Occluded
front

4

40

4

40

0

0

2

50
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                         55

                           TABLE 9

  SEASONAL NUMBER AND PERCENT OF SYNOPTIC TYPES
       ASSOCIATED WITH  PRECIPITATION MAXIMUMS
        IN THE EASTERN HALF OF THE URBAN AREA
                                             Surface   Upper   Air
                                            low-trough trough   mass

                                                401

                                                50      0     16


                                                316

                                                23      50     56


                                                102

                                                11      0     25


                                                401

                                                50      0     33
the hypothesis of urban-induced precipitation occurred largely in
the colder half-year, and this agrees with previous findings. 1

      The  marked tendency for precipitation with an east-half
maximization to occur later in the day than  the other precipitation
patterns during the winter and fall, and more frequently during
the period from midday to late afternoon than the other precipita-
tion patterns suggests the possibility that a  diurnal heating influ-
ence might be acting to produce maximization of precipitation in
the east.   Surface winds prior to the beginning of precipitation
periods maximizing in the eastern area were not frequently from
easterly azimuths, however,  a condition believed favorable for
bringing the urban nuclei and water vapor influences into the  cloud
and precipitation systems.  The only synoptic type associated
with precipitation periods maximizing in the east more frequently
than elsewhere was the occluded front.

EVALUATION OF CAUSES  FOR URBAN PRECIPITATION
MAXIMIZATION.
      Considerable data have been presented concerning the daily,
seasonal, and annual distribution of precipitation during all or
parts of the 1950-1959 decade.  It has been  repeatedly suggested
that  urban  influences could  be largely responsible for the max-
imization of precipitation in east side urban areas.  Champaign-
Urbana urban-rural differences in total precipitation,  days of
rain, and days with thunderstorms were statistically similar  to

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
56                        CHANGNON

results found elsewhere,  and attributed to urban influences on at-
mospheric conditions.  Based on this comparison it could be
superficially concluded that the findings of the 10 years of precip-
itation data collected in Champaign-Urbana were a  result of urban
meteorological influences.  Knowledge of the spatial precipitation
variability encountered in this climate through natural influences
and from varying raingage exposures, plus the lack of definite
measured proof of the action  of urban influences, however, leaves
the discerning observer unsure of the causes for the observed
variations in precipitation.  Therefore, a discussion of each of
three possible causes for the variation follows.
      Raingage Exposures.   Evaluating precipitation catch has
long been a problem in meteorology  and climatologyl2 because of
differing raingage exposures.  Also  the effects of various methods
of shielding raingages have been measured in many different ex-
periments with varying results.   Weiss and Wilson 13  reported
that amounts of precipitation measured when various shielding
techniques are used vary from 87 percent to as high as 340 per-
cent of unshielded catches.  From the values of the 17 experiments
they listed, the median value selected indicated that shielded rain-
gages  catch 9 percent more precipitation than unshielded gages.
This percentage  difference is comparable with the annual differ-
ence of 12 percent found for the 10-year period in Champaign-
Urbana.  That is, if the gages in  the eastern urban area gener-
ally were more  shielded than those in the west,  a west-to-east
increase comparable to that experienced in  1950-1959 might re-
sult.   To derive  such a conclusion it must be assumed that ex-
posure differences caused by obstacles  in an urban area might be
comparable with those differences between shielded and unshield-
ed gages.  None  of the 12 gages were shielded.  All the raingages
were assumed to have similar gage wind eddies, but it is possible
that  site and environment wind eddies, because of differences in
gage exposures,  varied sufficiently in magnitude to create wind
eddy differences  which approximated the differences in gage
eddies obtained between shielded and unshielded raingages.

      In further support of the possibility that gage  exposures are
responsible for the Champaign-Urbana differences,  it should be
noted that shielding effects are much more pronounced for snow-
fall than for rainfall. i3   Since the average urban snowfall in the
10-year period was 11. 8 inches, or about 1. 2 inches of water,
extreme exposure differences between the rural gages and the
central urban gages might produce a water measurement differ-
ence of about 0. 5 inch.  This  difference is based on a median  per-
centage determined from 18 field  experiments reported by Weiss
and Wilson; these experiments showed that the snow catch of a
shielded gage is 160 percent of the snow catch of an unshielded

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                        57

gage.  As noted in Table 2, the average urban-rural precipitation
difference in winter was 1. 0 inch; shielding variations therefore
could account for 50 percent of the observed difference.
      Since  exposure variability can be shown to be a possible
cause for observed precipitation difference, a method was devel-
oped to obtain a quantitative measure of the exposures of the 12
urban gages for comparison purposes.  No wind instruments were
available to perform this.

      The method initially consisted of measuring with a transit
the amount  of horizon blocking afforded by surrounding obstacles
which extended above the horizon line of the raingage tops. Since
the amount  of wind passing a gage orifice  is inversely related to
the gage catch,  the amount of blocking or  shielding by surround-
ing objects  should be directly related to the catch.  The exposure
in blocking  was  computed as the number of degrees of vertical
blocking in  each of the eight 45-degree sectors  in azimuth, with
each sector centered on the eight basic compass directions.
Since no object at any gage had a vertical  angle greater than  30
degrees, the total possible blocking in any sector was 45 degrees
times 30 degrees, or 1350 degrees, and the amount of blocking in
each sector at each gage was expressed as a  percent  of this total.

      Secondly,  these sector blocking percentages were normal-
ized to wind directions by multiplying each by the corresponding
annual wind direction frequency during the occurrence of precip-
itation.   Therefore, excessive gage blocking  to the  north from
where precipitation winds are infrequent would  not achieve as
much statistical significance as equal sector  blocking to the south
from where precipitation winds are frequent.  Unfortunately  this
calculation  does not include wind speed, but it does provide a
relative  measure of the effect of site and environment shielding
around the gages.
      The results of this method for evaluating  exposures of  the
12 gages are shown in Table 10.  A comparison of these results
with those in Table 1 indicates that, in general,  there is very
little agreement for any gage between the  rank of the  precipitation
catch and the shielding rank.  A high shielding factor should  re-
late  directly with a greater precipitation catch.  If the rank val-
ues based on precipitation amounts in Table 1 are added,  the
easternmost six urban gages have a score of  25, compared with
a score of 53 for the westernmost six gages.  A similar summa-
tion  of ranks based on the shielding factors in Table 10 provides
a total score of 41 for the easternmost gages and 37 for the west-
ernmost gages.  This indicates no  material difference between the
overall  exposures of the gages in the western and eastern halves
of the urban area.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
58                        CHANGNON

                          TABLE  10

           ENVIRONMENTAL SHIELDING FACTORS
                  FOR 12  URBAN RAINGAGES
Total
	 shielding
Gage
1
2
3
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
N
8. 4
3.0
1. 7
1. 3
1. 3
0
1.0
1. 3
0. 3
1.0
3. 3
NE
2. 6
1. 1
4. 6
1.8
1. 3
0. 7
1. 3
0.2
3. 7
3. 1
1.8
E
3.2
0. 3
3. 7
1. 1
1. 3
1. 8
1. 3
0
2. 4
0. 8
2. 6
SE
2. 9
0.2
1. 5
0. 9
0. 9
3.2
0. 3
0
0. 7
1. 7
1. 7
S
13.8
2. 9
7. 8
2.8
2. 5
9. 1
0. 6
0
2. 3
3. 9
4. 7
SW
4. 4
0. 7
0.8
1. 3
2. 1
0.2
0. 4
3.0
0.8
0.8
1.6

1
1
2

3
0
1
0
1
0
2
W
. 5
. 0
. 4
0
. 5
.2
.9
. 6
. 0
. 4
. 1
NW
4.
2.
1.

1.

1.
1.
0.
1.
3.
0
8
1
0
3
0
5
2
7
9
.9
value
40.
12.
23.
9.
14.
15.
8.
6.
11.
13.
21.
8
0
6
2
2
2
3
3
9
6
7
                                                        Rank based
                                                           on
                                                       shielding total
                                                            1
                                                            7
                                                            2
                                                            9
                                                            5
                                                            4
                                                           10
                                                           11
                                                            8
                                                            6
                                                            3
                              0  0. 4   1. 4    0    2.0        12
      A further corroboration was obtained by comparing summa-
 tions of the shielding factors for the four highest-ranked gages and
 the four lowest.   The four highest-ranked raingages,  numbers  9,
 10,  11, and 12, had a combined shielding factor of 49. 2, whereas
 the four lowest-ranked raingages, numbers  3, 4, 5,  and 7,  had a
 combined factor of 55. 3.

      The results of the investigation of gage exposure variability
 as a possible cause or explanation for the distribution of precip-
 itation  in 1950-1959 have  indicated that,  except for a  few un-
 measurable variations, differences in exposures in the urban
 area probably were not responsible for the observed variations in
 precipitation.  Any shielding differences that did affect the dis-
 tribution of precipitation were probably most active during snow-
 fall  in the winter season.  Quantitatively, this effect on snowfall
 catch could have  been 0. 5 inch of water,  which accounts for only
 12 percent  of the 4. 0-inch annual difference in precipitation for
 the eastern urban area and that for the western urban and rural
 areas.

      A raingage located in an urban area,  even with  a very un-
 sheltered exposure site, must be considered to have more en-
 vironmental shielding than most rural raingages, and therefore,
 the urban raingage will generally catch more precipitation.   In
 larger  urban areas it is conceivable that the increased turbulence
 and  friction effects might cause an overall reduction in the speed
 of storm  movement and increase the time required for passage
 over the  city,  thereby allowing more precipitation to  fall over
 the urban area.

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                        59

      Urban Effects.   The  second possible cause for the max-
imization of precipitation in the eastern half of the urban area is
the influence on precipitation systems from urban effects.  These
effects are considered to be additional condensation nuclei,  addi-
tional water vapor, and increased turbulence from surface rough-
ness and thermal heating.   In previous descriptions of the data
associated with precipitation quantity, seasonal distribution, num-
ber of rainy days, number of thunderstorm days, and synoptic
conditions, it was indicated that much of these  data could be in-
terpreted as  indicative of influences from urban effects.
      Additional condensation nuclei are presumed to be largely
derived from  combustion processes.   Champaign-Urbana has
very few industries and no heavy industries.  The five principal
point  sources of smoke are shown on Figure 1, and none,  except
for the heating plant near gage 9 and the University heating plant
near gage 1,  produces any large volume of smoke.  Furthermore,
the heating plant operations are restricted largely to the colder
seasons.  The only other potential sources are home heating
plants,  but only during the cold season.   Telford 1" recently
stated that industries, other than heavy industries such as  steel
plants,  probably have little influence on the freezing-nuclei count
in the atmosphere.  Therefore, except for some possible minor
influence in the winter season, it is believed that the Champaign-
Urbana urban area does  not produce sufficient condensation nuclei
to have an effect on precipitation systems.
      Much the same conclusion can be drawn concerning water
vapor production by  the Champaign-Urbana urban area.  Without
heavy industries no great volume of water vapor is  released to
the atmosphere.  The only other possibility for additional water
vapor might be evapotranspiration, from urban trees and lawns,
which could be greater than that from corn and soybean crops in
rural areas;  however, data published by Blaney, '•^ concerning
consumptive  water use of plants, which is indicative of the rate
of evapotranspiration, indicate that corn and soybeans have a
greater combined rate of evapotranspiration than grass and decid-
uous trees.   This  indicates that the foliage in the urban area would
release less  water vapor through evapotranspiration than foliage
in rural areas.

      It thus  appears that air turbulence produced by the Cham-
paign-Urbana urban  area could be the only major effect which
could influence precipitation.  Unfortunately, no measurements
of the roughness effect on turbulence are available, but this effect
may be considerable, especially when the flat,  featureless sur-
rounding rural area  is taken into consideration. Thermal heating
over the cities also could produce turbulence by lifting the  air.


SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
60                        CHANGNON

In a recent article DeMarrais 15 has shown that air over an urban
area  because of local temperature conditions, is relatively less
stable throughout the day than air over rural areas.
      A comparison of the mean monthly minimum and maximum
temperatures,  based on 6 years of comparative data, has shown
that the maximum values at the rural Airport station (Figure 1)
range from 0. 5°,  in the summer-fall period,  to 1. 3° in the
winter-spring period,  lower than those at the urban Central sta-
tion. 16 The rural mean monthly minimum temperatures vary
from 0. 8°,  in summer,  to 2. 0°, in winter,  lower than the urban
values.  This proves that  on the average the urban area is warmer
than the rural area.
      To further examine  the urban-rural temperature difference
in time and space, two additional weather stations were installed
on the fringes of the urban area (Figure 1) for a 12-month period
beginning in July 1959.  The 2-hourly mean seasonal values from
each of the  stations were compared with those from the Central
urban station, and the results are  given in Table 11.  Space does
not permit a thorough discussion of all the many interesting fea-
tures displayed in Table 11;  however, a few pertinent observa-
tions require mention.  In all four seasons there are times of the
day when the rural (Airport) and outlying urban stations (NW and
SE) have temperatures exceeding those at the urban Central sta-
tion.   The time of day when these excesses  occur  varies from
late in the afternoon in winter and  fall to mid-morning in spring
and summer. The more  rapid  afternoon cooling at the  Central
urban station in winter and fall  suggests the occurrence of greatei
radiational  heat loss over the urban area.
      For each season data in Table 5 were used to select the 8-
hour periods of maximum precipitation associated with the pre-
cipitation periods which maximized in the eastern half of the
cities, and  these periods have been indicated in Table 11.  Com-
parison of these 8-hour periods with the mean temperatures of
the Central urban station in each season reveals that the period,
except in summer, occurred during or just  after the hours of
maximum heating.  Further, comparison  of these 8-hour periods
with the temperature departures of the rural and outlying urban
stations reveals that the 8-hour period in  each season always
began at hours when the temperature departures began to exceed
the Central  station mean values.  From these relationships it
would appear reasonable to conclude that the urban area, because
of higher temperatures and greater radiation at the ground sur-
face than in the rural areas,  may have  been producing more
thermal lifting of air and  a generally more unstable lower atmos-
phere, and consequently was affecting precipitation systems.
DeMarrais 15 has shownj  howeverj that urb&n &nd ^^ ^

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                            61


         COMPARISON  OF  TEMPERATURES  BETWEEN
                CENTRAL AND FRINGE STATIONS
                        July  1959-June 1960

00 02
Winter
Central
mean 28.8 28.2
Station departures
SE -0.3 -0.1
NW -0.5 -0.3
AP -1.- -1.0
8-hour period of most
frequent precipitation
Spring
Central
mean 42.8 41.4
Station departures
SE 	
NW -1.1 -1.0
AP -2.6 -2.5
8-hour period of most
frequent precipitation

04


27. 8

-0. 3
-0.4
-1.6



40. 1

-0. 7
-2. 5



06 08


27.6 28.

-0.4 -1.
-0.4 -1.
-1.1 -2.



39. 3 43.

-0.9 -0.
-1.3 -0.






7

2
3
0



2

1
2


Time,
10


31. 5

-1.2
-1. 1
-0.6



47. 9

+0. 4
+0. 5
X

CST
12 14


33.8 34.3

-0.6 -0.1
-1.0 +0.3
-0.4 +0.2
X


50.8 52.6

+0. 4 +0. 2
+0.2 -0.3
1000-1800


16 18


33.1 31.2

+0.4 +0.1
+0. 7 +0
+0.4 -0. 6
1400-2200


52.8 51.0

+0 -0. 7
-0.8 -1.7
X


20


30.2

-0. 2
-0. 4
-1.0



47. 8

-1. 6
-2. 7



22 Average


28.9 30.3

-0.2 -0.3
-0.1 -0.4
-1.4 -0.7
X


45.1 46.2

-1.2 -0.3
-2.4 -1.3


 Summer
  Central
   mean 68.2  66.5  65.3  65.9  70.8  76.4  79.5  81.1  80.9  78.4  74.1   70.3    73.1
  Station departures
   SE   -0.7  -0.7  -1.2  -0.8  +1.8  +1.3  +1.3  +2.2  +1.4  +0.9  -1.1   -0.8    +0.3
   NW  -0.2  -0.5  -0.5  -1.5  -0.6  -0.3  +0.6  +0.7  +0.8  +1.0  -0.1   -0.2    -0.1
   AP   -1.7  -1.5  -1.9  -0.4  +2.1  +1.3  +1.0  +0.1  -0.4  -0.3  -2.4   -1.9    -0.3
  8-hour period of most             X	0800-1600	X
   frequent precipitation

 Fall
  Central
   mean 47.1  46.3  45.6  46.8  50.6  55.3  58.3  58.7  56.4  52.4  49.7   48.0    51.3
  Station departures
   SE   +0.4  +0.1  -0.2  -1.9  -1.2  -0.9  +0   +1.0  +2.1  +1.3  +0.3   +0.1    +0.3
   NW  +0.7  +0.2  +0   -2.1  -2.4  -2.0  -0.8  +1.1  +2.4  +2.4  +1.0   +0.8    +0.3
   AP   -0.5  -0.7  -1.1  -2.9  -1.8  -0.8  +0   +1.0  +2.1  +0.7  -0.2   -0.5    -0.4
  8-hour period of most                  X   " 1000-1800	X
   frequent precipitation



 temperatures several hundred feet above the surface are not too

 dissimilar in daylight hours,  the period when precipitation max-

 imization in the east was most  frequent.  DeMarrais also indicated

 that the urban influence on air temperature above a city was

 greatest at  night,  tending to break down the inversion which re-

 mains over the  rural areas.  Thus, his findings tend to  refute the

 claim that thermal effects were a major urban influence on

 precipitation.

       Natural Variability of Precipitation   The third possible

 cause for the precipitation distribution in the Champaign-Urbana

 area in the  1950-1959 period could be natural spatial variations

 in precipitation.  In this area nearly 40 percent of the average

 annual precipitation is derived  from thunderstorms,  and the ex-

 extreme variability of  storm and monthly precipitation in the area

 is well known. ^  Unfortunately, similar statistical measures of
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
62
                          CHANGNON
the spatial variability of seasonal and annual precipitation,  es-
pecially over short distances,  are not yet available.  Therefore,
it is difficult to evaluate statistically the 1950-1959 Champaign-
Urbana seasonal and annual patterns in regard to significant dif-
ferences which may have arisen from natural rainfall variability.
      During this same 10-year period the Illinois State Water
Survey operated another raingage network in a completely rural
area 55 miles northwest of Champaign-Urbana. ^ This network,
the Panther Creek Network,  was comprised of nine recording
raingages located in a 100-square-mile area,  as shown in
Figure 6.
31.5,
   \
    \

                                                 N
                          A   '
   AREAS EQUAL TO SIZE ^ )
   OF CHAMPAIGN-URBANA K^
   URBAN  AREA
         \   •
                            31.5    32
                                                 35
        SCALE
         MILES
	 NETWORK
          BOUNDARY
    • RAINGAGES
  Figure 6. Annual average precipitation on Panther Creek raingage network, 1950-59
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                        63

In the results here reported for this network,  data from two
Weather Bureau raingages located on  the periphery of this net-
work were incorporated.  The precipitation data from this net-
work are considered to be representative of natural variations in
precipitation, and the  network is near enough to Champaign-Urbana
to experience comparable climatological conditions.   Therefore,
data from this rural network were compared with that from the
urban area, even though the gage densities differed,  because the
rural network data were the only available  expression of natural
variability of precipitation for this 10-year period and this area.
      The average annual pattern of precipitation in the rural net-
work is shown in Figure 6.   Superimposed  on this pattern are two
rectangles,  each the size of the Champaign-Urbana urban area.
These  rectangles have been  placed in  two portions of  the rural
pattern where variations were comparable  with those exhibited in
the urban network.  This indicated that the annual urban pattern
(Figure 2) could be entirely  a result of natural causes.
      The rural network data for each year and each gage were
ranked from high to low,  as were the  urban annual data shown in
Table  1.  In the rural  network,  20 of the 30 possible highest three
ranks were  achieved by the five easternmost gages.   This is com-
parable with the value of 25  of 30 three highest ranks obtained in
the urban area by the six easternmost gages.  If the  six north-
easternmost gages in the rural network are chosen as a group for
a similar comparison, we find that these gages had 24 of the 30
highest three  ranks.  These findings also suggest that the urban
precipitation distribution was of a magnitude exhibited by natural
variation.  In 8 of the  10 years the annual totals of the three east-
ernmost gages in the rural  network ranked first.  In the urban
area the highest annual rank occurred at one of the six eastern-
most gages  in 9 of the 10 years.
      The seasonal patterns in the rural network did not show the
consistent maximization in  the eastern area in each season  that
was seen in the urban  network.  In the rural network  definite sea-
sonal maximums occurred in the eastern area only in the fall and
spring.  In the winter  a north-south latitudinal increase was ap-
parent; in the summer the precipitation  pattern was more ambig-
uous, and no definite regional maximization occurred.  These
findings,  especially for the winter season,  reflect the fact that
the rural network was experiencing true natural variations in pre-
cipitation.   In this climatic region, the distribution of precipita-
tion in winter is much less  variable than in the other  seasons  and
also is related closely to change in latitude.
     Another measure of rural or natural  precipitation variability
was made using the data from the individual precipitation periods

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
64                        CHANGNON
in
... the 1958-1959 period.  As shown in Table 4, 33 percent of all
1958-1959 precipitation periods in the urban network maximized
in the eastern half of the urban area.  To obtain comparable val-
ues from the larger rural network,  it was decided to determine
how many of the 245 precipitation periods on the rural network
maximized at any one of the three easternmost gages.  In the 2-
year period, 122 precipitation periods maximized at these three
gages.  This frequency, expressed as a percent of the total per-
iods,  was almost 50 percent,  compared with the 33 percent fre-
quency in the urban area.  This comparison may be  questionable
because of differences in area,  but it does indicate that a frequent
concentration of storm precipitation can occur naturally in a very
small portion of a given area.  Time did not permit  further de-
tailed investigation of the precipitation data  from the rural net-
work, but the results presented here appear to prove that most  of
the urban measurements of precipitation could have  been entirely
a result of natural  variations rather than of  any urban influence.

SUMMARY AND SUGGESTIONS

      In reporting on a study of precipitation in a moderate-sized
urban area with very little industry and no pollution  problem,
attempts have been made to illustrate some  of the important prob-
lems  associated with the overall question of whether urban effects
influence  the spatial distribution of precipitation.  It might be
argued that some of the problems raised by  the Champaign-Urbana
site would not be applicable in larger cities.   Similar data from a
larger urban area probably would not provide  more enlightening
answers,  however,  because urban-rural percentage differences in
precipitation conditions measured in Champaign-Urbana were
comparable to those measured at other much larger urban areas.

      As stated previously, the present general lack of knowledge
of the microscale atmospheric processes does not permit the
evaluation and measurement of urban effects on precipitation
processes with the degree of accuracy desired.  In general,  these
effects have been claimed to produce increases in precipitation on
the order of 5 to 15 percent, but meteorologists cannot presently
measure or describe the atmospheric processes well enough to
achieve a high degree of accuracy in theoretical calculations.

      The only other hope for defining the relation between urban
conditions and precipitation is through an intensive measurement
program to be used with generalized inferences.  The results of
the Champaign-Urbana study have  shown that the precipitation
maximization in Urbana could easily be claimed to result either
from urban effects  or from natural variations  of precipitation.
Raingage exposures presented a problem in  the evaluation of
effects;  and admittedly,  not all of the instruments and data needed

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                         65

to make such decisions were available.   To instrument an urban
area for the purpose of evaluating urban influences on precipita-
tion would be a difficult and tremendously expensive project,  and
investigators would want to be confident that results from such an
undertaking would provide reliable answers.  Another and probably
more serious problem to overcome,  even with a thoroughly in-
strumented project, is that of natural variation of precipitation,
especially in climatic regions where variability is known to be
excessive because  of the predominance  of shower-type rainfall.
Much more  statistical information is needed concerning the vari-
ability of  seasonal  and annual precipitation in small densely-gaged
networks.  Until these data are available one cannot provide a
statistical description of the natural  spatial variability of precip-
itation; and until this description is available,  it will be difficult
to evaluate the natural variability of  precipitation in a study of
the relationship between urban influences and precipitation. Many
large urban areas in the United States are near to physical fea-
tures, such as large water bodies, hills, and mountains, which
make urban-precipitation studies even more difficult.
      Whether a given city  produces,  or can produce, a 5,  10, or
15 percent increase in rainfall and number of rainy days in por-
tions of its urban area is a question that neither meteorology nor
climatology can at  present  answer accurately.  Gross or general-
ized urban effects may be claimed,  but  to obtain reliable evidence
of their existence,  we must increase our knowledge of atmospher-
ic processes and undertake extensive measurement programs.
                         REFERENCES

 1.  Landsberg,  H.E.,  "The Climate of Towns",  Man's Role in
      Changing  the Face of the Earth.  University of Chicago
      Press,  Chicago,  Illinois,  1956,  pp.  584-603.
 2.  Chow,  V.T., Hydrologic Studies of Urban Watersheds.  Hy-
      draulic Engineering Series No.  2,  University  of Illinois,
      Urbana,  1955.
 3.  Huff, F. A. , and S. A.  Changnon, Jr.,  Severe Rainstorms in
      Illinois 1958-1959.   Report of Investigation 42, Illinois
      State Water Survey, Urbana,  1961.
 4.  Changnon, S. A. ,  andF.A. Huff, Studies of Radar-Depected
      Precipitation Lines.. Scientific Report No.  2,  Contract No.
      AF 19(604)-4940, Urbana,  Illinois, 1961.
 5.  Hiser,  H. W. ,  and S. G.  Bigler, Wind Data from Radar Echoes.
      Tech.  Report No. 1, Navy BuAer Contract No. N189s-88164,
      Urbana, Illinois, 1953.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
 66                        CHANGNON

 6.  Byers, H. R. ,  and others,  The Thunderstorm.   U.S. Govern-
       ment Printing Office, Washington, D. C. ,  1949.
 7.  Hudson, H. E. ,  and W. J.  Roberts,  1952-55 Illinois Drought
       with Special Reference to Impounding Reservoir Design.
       Bulletin 43,  Illinois State Water Survey,  Urbana,  1955.
 8.  Huff,  F.A. , andS.A.  Changnon,  Jr.,  "Distribution of Exces-
       sive Rainfall Amounts Over an Urban Area", Journal of
       Geophysical Research,  65(11): 3759-3765,  November,  1960.
 9.  Changnon,  S. A. ,  Jr. , Thunderstorm-Precipitation Relations
       in Illinois.  Report of Investigation 34, Illinois State Water
       Survey, Urbana,  Illinois,  1957.
10.  Telford,  J.W. , "Freezing Nuclei from Industrial Processes",
       Journal of Meteorology,  17(6):676-679, December,  1960.
       pp.  676-679.
11.  Dickson, R. R. , "Meteorological Factors Affecting Particulate
       Air Pollution of A City",  Bulletin of  AMS,  42(8):556-560,
       August, 1961.
12.  Kurtyka, J. C. , Precipitation Measurements  Study.  Report of
       Investigation 20,  Illinois State Water Survey,  Urbana,  1953.
13.  Weiss, L. L. ,  and W. T. Wilson,  "Precipitation Gage Shields",
       Comptes Rendus  et Rapports.  Toronto, 1958,  pp. 462-484.
14.  Blaney,  H. F. ,  "Irrigation Requirements of Crops", Agricul-
       tural Engineering,  32( 12):665-668, December, 195T!
15.  DeMarrais, G.  A. ,  "Vertical Temperature Difference  Ob-
       served Over  An Urban Area",  Bulletin of AMS, 42(8):548-
       554, August,  1961.
16.  Changnon,  S. A. ,  Jr. , Summary of Weather Conditions at
       Champaign-Urbana, Illinois.  Bulletin 47, Illinois State
       Water Survey, Urbana,  1959.
17.  Huff,  F.A. , and J.  C.  Neill, Rainfall Relations on Small  Areas
       in Illinois.  Bulletin 44,  Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana,
       1957.
                          DISCUSSION

       CHAIRMAN LANDSBERG:  This was certainly very gracious
 of Mr. Stout to present Mr. Changnon's paper.  If Mr.  Stout is
 willing to stand in for his colleague,  we have a minute or two for
 questions.

       DR.  SCHMIDT:  One thing occurs  to me in regards to this.
 Due consideration has  been shown to the individual exposure of
 the stations, but I wonder if there isn't some possibility that the
 urban area, the built-up area itself,  creates  to a general de-
 crease in the low-level wind flow in that region.  Would it be pos-
 sible that the lighter winds in the eastern region might result in
 a larger apparent catch of precipitation?  The rain gages  are so


                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
URBAN PRECIPITATION PATTERNS                        67

sensitive to wind speeds that if the mean winds in that region were
generally lower, it is a possible thing that I think you could look
into fairly easily.  Because  if  it is so,  then  the catch would be
most different during higher winds and less  different during low
winds.

      MR. STOUT:  This is  true.  We are all aware of this, but
as yet we have no data  with which to  correct for this apparent
defect.   But I think you are right that the general wind movement
is much less in the built-up  areas than in the rural areas,  or  at
the outer fringes of town.

      FROM THE FLOOR:  Is  your Panther  Creek network totally
free of urban  influence?
      MR. STOUT:  Yes.

      FROM THE FLOOR:  So the variations that you found here
which are equal in magnitude to the urban area could not in any
way be  charged to wind speed?
      MR. STOUT:  The topmost gage was in a town of about 750
or a thousand people,  and there were no industries there.  But
over to the right there  that was all rural areas,  all open, country
and no problem as far as exposures.

      DR. HEWSON: Are there any other orographic effects other
than the Panther Creek?

      MR. STOUT:  No, the  change  in elevation at Panther Creek
is a maximum of about 100 feet in that area, so it  is a relatively
flat land.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                  Some Effects of Air Pollution on
                                  Visibility In and Near Cities*

                                  GEORGE C. HOLZWORTH, V. $. Weather
                                  Bureau, Los Angeles, California
 Summary
     Regularly obtained visibility observations are examined with regard to effects due
 to nearby air pollution sources. Some inherent difficulties in dealing with visibility data
 are pointed out. The effects on visibility of wind speed and of wind direction relative to
 pollution sources are described. A method is presented for analyzing possible trends in
 visibility.
       One of the more profound effects of air pollution is on visi-
 bility.   To some extent such effects are experienced by most mem-
 bers of a community and therefore are worthy of consideration in
 air  pollution appraisals.  To obtain a record of visibility observa-
 tions suitable for study,  one turns  almost invariably to the nearest
 observing office of the Weather Bureau.  Typically,  such offices
 are at  the airport, often near the outskirts of the city.  Observa-
 tions at the edge of a  city offer an opportunity to assess the effects
 of the urban area as a general pollution source.   As  shown in Fig-
 ure 1,  the urban area of Sacramento,  California,  acts as  a  source
 of pollutants that reduce the visibility  at the municipal airport,
 located 4. 5  miles south of downtown Sacramento.  Relative  to the
 airport,  most of the Sacramento urban area lies in the sector
 northwest clockwise through east-southeast.  As the drawing in-
 dicates,  the higher percentages of poor visibilities,   0-10 miles,
 are  associated with winds from the urban directions.
      The data in Figure 1 are based on hourly observations dur-
 ing May, July, September,  and November for 18 years.  Only day-
 time observations have been considered,  since visibility during
 darkness depends on different factors and is considered less re-
 liable.   In an attempt  to eliminate  visibility reduction due to natur-
 al causes, the observations considered were restricted to periods
 in which wind  speeds were 1 to 10  miles per hour (mph),  no pre-
 cipitation was occurring,  and relative  humidity was  less than 90
 percent.  Even with these restrictions, there remain 13, 726 ob-
 servations.  For small samples such visibility wind roses are
 often less regular than that shown  in Figure  1.

      In this analysis  the  implied  assumption is  that the wind
direction at the time  of the visibility  observation  is  roughly
*This work is supported by the U. S. Public Health Service.

                                 69

-------
70
                                  HOLZWORTH
           n7lP  '*l > *"^»T 'V^O^—^J-
   -;^.. iSlfl^SlS^
Figure  1.  Sacramento metropolitan area with wind rose of the percent frequency for each
           wind direction for visibilities of 0-10 miles.  Wind rose centered on observation
           site, municipal airport.  Data based on daytime hourly observations during May,
           July, September, and November for 18 years.  Observations with precipitation
           and/or relative humidity greater than 90 percent, or with wind ipvedi other than
           1-10 mph omitted.
                                          SEC  TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY                 71

representative of the trajectory of the air since it passed over
significant pollutant sources.  This assumption appears valid at
Sacramento but may not apply in areas of small-scale eddies or
where there are marked diurnal variations in air flow.
      The diurnal variation in visibility at Chicago's Midway
Airport from January to March 1930 was discussed  by Week.
He observed that the main contribution to reduced visibility was
smoke.  An average daily minimum visibility of 3. 0 miles at
8:00 a. m.  was attributed to the smoke released after the man of
the house arose and stoked the furnace.  As the day advanced,
the smoke became lighter (probably in part because of increased
atmospheric mixing) and the visibility improved to 4. 5 miles
near  3:00 p. m.   In the late afternoon  firing at residences and
banking of factory furnaces reduced the visibility to a secondary
minimum of 3. 5 miles near  5:00 to 6:00 p. m. ,  after which it
slowly rose again to an average daily maximum of 7. 0 miles at
4:00 a. m.
      At Columbus,  Ohio, daily visibility observations made at
the center of the city at  8:00 a, m.  for 11 years have been com-
pared to corresponding Weather Bureau observations at the  air-
port,  about 6 miles  to the east-northeast.  The airport is well
beyond the city limits and is considered an out-of-town location.
Figure 2 shows that the  average annual visibility at  the city lo-
cation is consistently about 1 mile lower than that at the airport.
No observations were included if precipitation was occurring.  It
is interesting to note in  these  data a trend of improving visibility
through 1958 at both sites.   This trend may be related to the av-
erage annual dustfall rates in  Columbus,  shown in Figure 2. The
steady decline  in these rates is consistent with the trend of in-
creasing visibility,  and  both trends reflect the effective program
of the Division of Smoke Regulation and Inspection of the Columbus
Department of Public  Safety.
      The term "visibility" is used in this paper in  its meteoro-
logical sense,  which is more properly "visual range, " or the
greatest distance at which prominent  objects can just be seen.
This  use should be distinguished from visibility in terms of  the
clarity with which objects can be seen, although the two uses
are not unrelated.
      An important use of visibility data is as an indicator of air
pollution trends, as described for  Columbus.   To determine the
visibility trend  for the United  States in general the percent fre-
quencies of all hourly visibilities less than 7 miles  (due to all
causes) have been compared at a number  of locations for two per-
iods separated by about  15 to 20 years.   The data are presented
in Table 1.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
72                     HOLZWORTH




                        TABLE 1





        PER CENT FREQUENCIES OF ALL VISIBILITIES



                   LESS THAN 7 MILES AT



           WEATHER BUREAU AIRPORT STATIONS &






                    JAN FEE MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
BAKERSFIELD 1/29-12/38
CALIFORNIA 7/55-6/59
BURBANK 10/31-12/38
CALIFORNIA 5/50-4/55
CARIBOU 1/38-12/41
MAINE 7/59-3/61
CHICAGO 1/30-12/38
ILLINOIS 1/59-12/60
COLUMBIA 6/30-12/38
MISSOURI 7/59-3/61
COLUMBUS 1/30-12/38
OHIO 7/58-6/61
DBS MOINES 4/33-12/38
IOWA 7/58-6/61
EL PASO 7/30-12/38
TEXAS 1/49-12/53
GRAND ISLAND 9/31-12/38
NEBRASKA 7/58-6/61
GREENSBORO 1/30-12/38
N. CAROLINA 7/58-6/61
INDIANAPOLIS 7/29-12/38
INDIANA 7/58-6/61
LAKE CHARLES 3/39-4/42
LOUISIANA 7/59-3/61
MEDFORD 7/29-12/38
OREGON 8/50-7/55
MILWAUKEE 1/30-12/38
WISCONSIN 7/58-6/61
MOLINE 1/30-12/38
ILLINOIS 7/58-6/61
NASHVILLE 7/37-12/41
TENNESSEE 7/58-6/61
OAKLAND 7/29-12/38
CALIFORNIA 5/50-4/55
23 9
47 29
[Taj 24
J25J 14
36 30
21 30
72 70
57 37
31 34
21 28
63 57
46 37
54 46
23 30
[I] 5
111 4
25 23
15 23
31 24
23 24
61 56
35 40
11 12
20 24

35 12
40 23
50 45
29 30
63 55
31 34
45 41
26 27
26 19
28 26
PEORIA 3/36-12/38 68 56
ILLINOIS 7/58-6/61 36 36
RICHMOND 6/29-12/38 39 33
VIRGINIA 7/58-6/61 22 24
3
6
24
21

24
28
65
48
29
24
45
29
41
28
9
4
20
20
23
19
50
33
17
16
5
4
40
0
5
1
2

29
32

19
21
62
32
22
4
28
19
29
11
10
4
23
10
18
11
38
14
11
9
PI
14
28 17
32
37
15
13
54
34
12
2
19
16
21
9
4
2
13
10
10
12
26
14
6
3
2
2
32
18
51 40 25
34 14
32 11
17 9
9
8
4
9
40 29
33 12
27 22
20 13
11
10
7
2
8
20
11
19
18
1
3
48
42
16
14
48-
30
7
6
16
20
14
9
2
1
m
lil
6
17
18 1
18 )
3
4
1
0
27
2
2

3 7
5 9
I
11 29
15 40 58

43 42 43
45 51 51
18 16 19
10 13 10
47 52 52
32 38 33
m
lil
8 13
4 2
16 23 23
26 32 24
~il 20 20
io|
1
1
3
3
8 9
0 2
0 1
8 10
2 5
10 11 16
22 28 22
Til 31 32
22| 30 19
356
8 10 9
! [
2] 9
3 5
22 30 32
11 11 22 12
21 [Til 37 35
14 |_20J 19 14
8 13 16 12
10 15 17 17
3
5
7 11 25
1 10 18
16 17 28 30
11 16 20 12
18 20 22 26
22 26 41 27
38 22 21
47 34 26
20 31 39
14 23 18
58
40
18
14
35
25
26
12
1
1
10
3
15
24
38
21
12
15
56 73
29 39
23 36
5 15
53 68
23 41
32 52
11 17
1 3
1 3
15 20
6 9
26 34
14 13
46 65
18 31
11 19
15 20

13
29
38
19
45
21
23
19
28
27
37
20
26
23
23 37
49 46
36 43
18 21
51 66
12 26
43 44
16 25
41 30
37 30
41 62
17 26
34 38
18 18
                           SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY

                            TABLE 1 (Continued)
                                                  73
 SACRAMENTO
 CALIFORNIA
 SALEM
 OREGON
 SAN DIEGO
 CALIFORNIA
 SEATTLE
 WASHINGTON
 SIOUX CITY
 IOWA
 SOUTH BEND
 INDIANA
 ST. LOUIS
 MISSOURI
 TULSA
 OKLAHOMA
 WINSLOW
 ARIZONA
1/30-12/38
3/50-2/55

1/34-12/38
7/55-6/59

1/30-12/38
8/49-7/54

1/30-12/38
7/55-6/59

1/47-12/51
7/58-6/61

6/30-12/38
7/58-6/61

1/35-12/41
1/58-12/60

3/30-12/36
7/58-6/61

2/31-12/38
7/55-6/59
JAN FEE MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
 42 [22J
 39  30
4
9
2 1 1
324
2
4
13
8
16
19
37
44
55
46
 35  29
 25  19
 90  85   86
 79  78   88
 50  45   39
 34  18   28
 26  24   17
 14  19   12
                 0   0
                 0   0
       51
       24
87  81   77
75  67   71
30  44   53
13  28   34
                                  37
                                  24
       33
       20
           46
           27
           86
           73
          46
          38
           45
           27
          40
          13
              37
              35
              88
              82
                                          36
                                          28
                                      11   17
                                       9   11
              67
              41
               52
               22
          14  22
           4  12
0  0   0  Fol   4
0  00   2  [lj   0
   Observations at hourly intervals.
 Data Sources: U. S. Weather Bureau Local Climatological Data, Climatography of the U. S.
 No. 30-(for selected stations), and Normal Plying Weather for the U. S. (New Orleans, 1945).
 The  stations listed in the table were selected because the obser-
 vation sites did not change significantly during the time between
 the two periods compared.  Where the frequency of visibilities
 less  than 7 miles is greater in the later  period (lower row) than
 in the earlier period (upper row), the figures  are boxed in. Low
 visibilities are more frequent in the later period in less than 26
 percent of the comparisons.  Further, these increases  in poor
 visibility are for the most part rather small: of the 336 compar-
 isons only 13 are greater  than 10 percent, 4 are greater than 20
 percent, and  none are greater than 30 percent.  On the  other
 hand, many of the decreases in frequency of low visibilities are
 large: 108 are greater than  10 percent, 35 are greater than 20
 percent, and  10  are greater than 30  percent.   These changes are
 all the more significant  in view of a  revised method of reporting
 visibility.  As pointed out by Robinson 2* visibility was  reported
 before January 1, 1939,  as the greatest visibility over the hori-
 zon.   Since then it has been reported as  the lowest visibility over
 the half of the horizon (not necessarily continuous)  with the
      *This reference includes an excellent discussion  of the the-
 ory of visibility  and many of the  practical considerations to be
 made in utilizing visibility data for air pollution purposes.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
 K
 tq
 O

 H
 M
 O
 ffi
 2
 1 — I
 O
o
z>
H
                               AVERAGE 8:00 A.M. VISIBILITY

                                         MILES

                            123456
                                                                COLUMBUS, OHIO
                                                                          30
                                                                     AVERAGE DUSTFALL

                                                              TONS PER SQUARE MILE PER MONTH

                                                             25      20      15       10      5





























1 [_






































1

       ••   DOWNTOWN           ISsai^    AIRPORT                     IN CITY


                 DATA SOURCE: COLUMBUS DIVISION OF SMOKE REGULATION AND INSPECTION 14


Figure 2.  Average 8:00 A.M. visibility at downtown Columbus, Ohio, and at the municipal airport,

           6 miles east-northeast; and  average dustfall rates in Columbus.
                                                                                                                                        ffi
                                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                                        r
                                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                                     SJ
                                                                                                                     H
                                                                                                                     ffi

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY                  75

greatest visibility.

     Although the data of Table 1 are meager, the differences
seem much too large to attribute to chance alone.  It appears
that visibility in many urban areas of the United  States is im-
proving.  Such a trend  is perhaps surprising, but there is some
evidence to indicate that it is real.  Prior to control of the qual-
ity of solid fuel in St.  Louis (beginning about 1941) and in Pitts-
burgh (beginning about  1945) pollution  in winter,  due largely to
smoke from coal combustion,  was often  dense  enough to require
the use of street lamps  and automobile headlights at midday.   It
has been estimated that in St.  Louis smoke was reduced 75 per-
cent and in Pittsburgh,  70 percent. 3  Visibility data for St. Louis,
included in Table  1, show a marked reduction in poor visibilities,
especially in the  colder months.

      Some idea of the  contaminants produced by the combustion
of coal,  oil, and natural gas may be obtained from Table 2.  The
weight of particulate material produced per BTU decreases by
about an order of magnitude for each conversion, from coal to
oil and from oil to gas.  Coal  and oil combustion produce about
the same quantity of gaseous  material, but natural gas produces
only one-fifth that amount.

                          TABLE 2

          COMPARISON OF CONTAMINANTS FROM

             COMBUSTION OF COAL,  OIL AND

          AND  NATURAL GAS (INDUSTRIAL BOILERS) a

                        (lb/107 Btu)

                        Coal           Oil           Gas
Particulates           14.1           1.93          0.14

      Gases           26.8          26.62          5.24
       Total           40.9          28.55          5.38

a  After  Neiburger (Ref.  15)

      A specific example of the effect of fuel conversion on vis-
ibility improvement has been described by Bloodworth.    At the
municipal airport at Atlanta,  Georgia, a railroad switching yard
2 miles to the northwest was listed as a principal smoke  source
(for reduced visibilities).    The  total number  of regular hourly
observations when smoke alone reduced the visibility to less than


SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
76
                        HOLZWORTH
 1 mile was tabulated for the period from 1944 to 1951   Table 3
 h™wthat as the locomotives in the yard were converted from
 steam (coal) to diesel,  the annual number of poor visibilities due
 to smoke alone was greatly reduced.  This effect was most pro-
 nounced during the period from 1947 to 1949.  Thereafter the
 continued conversion of locomotives to  diesel fuel had little ap-
 parent effect.  Bloodworth noted in addition that smoke reduction
 at the airport was  also augmented by a  general fuel change in the
 area from coal to natural gas.

                          TABLE 3

      TOTAL NUMBER OF VISIBILITY OBSERVATIONS

 IN GIVEN VISIBILITY CATEGORIES DUE TO SMOKE ALONE

      AT ATLANTA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT,  GEORGIA a

                                Percent Conversion of Steam
          Visibility Less Than  (Coal) to Diesel Locomotives
1 mile 3 miles
17
20
17
15
5
1
0
2
191
182
135
139
113
17
6
22
 1944

 1945

 1946

 1947

 1948

 1949

 1950

 1951

 aAfter Bloodworth (Ref. 4)
                                in Nearby Yards




                                     Started

                                        20


                                        60


                                        90
                                                             5
      Nearby railroad yards have been listed as a common pri-
mary source of smoke  and reduced visibility at many airports
The American Petroleum  Institute 6 reports that before World
War II less than 2 percent of the locomotives in use on the major
railroads burned diesel fuel.   In 1958 more than 90 percent of
such locomotives were diesel fueled.
      Besides the changing of fuels there have been improve-
ments in combustion techniques and equipment and in the methods
of capturing pollutants before they are emitted to the atmosphere,
The general public is certainly becoming more aware of air pol-
lution, with the result that increasing efforts are being made to
reduce emissions to the atmosphere.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY                  77

      It is not intended here to settle the matter of whether vis-
ibility in the United States has been generally improving or de-
teriorating.  Several significant matters have not even been men-
tioned.  But the information presented here suggests that the
emission  of visibility-reducing materials to the  atmosphere well
may have declined.

      For  specific locations the evaluation of visibility data with
reference  to air pollution is not often simple.  In such studies it
is desirable to eliminate those cases of visibility reduction due
to natural  causes.  For precipitation this is straightforward.
For fog it  is much less so because many man-made pollutants
are hygroscopic and may act as condensation nuclei in the for-
mation of fog.  Further the meteorological  conditions favorable
to fog formation are also conducive to poor dispersion of air
pollutants.  The usual  procedure for eliminating cases of poor
visibility  due to natural causes is to select  some relative humid-
ity above  which the visibility observations are neglected.  In trend
studies it would be helpful if  the dispersive characteristics of  the
atmosphere and their effects on production  of pollutants would not
vary from year to year.  But they do vary,  and there are seldom
sufficient data  to allow for such effects.

      In addition to the troublesome influences of the weather
there are other difficulties in dealing with visibility data. Since
visibility  is defined as  the greatest distance at which objects can
just be seen, there must be  objects present.  In some localities
the number and distribution  of objects,  or markers,  may be un-
satisfactory.  Also, the erection of new markers may change the
spectrum of reported visibilities.  Visibility observations are
subjective estimates made by trained and experienced observers.
These estimates are based on the ability to "see" and it is known
that such  capacities are far  from constant,  either among different
people or in the same person at different  times.

      Although not all of the factors influencing visibility have
been touched on,  it should be apparent that  there are good reasons
for visibilities to fluctuate markedly from year to year (and over
even shorter spans).  In trend studies such variations are often
observed,  with the result that the trend is difficult to evaluate,
especially over short periods.  It is usually reasonable to as-
sume that  such fluctuations are random,  however.

      One  of the more  extensive studies of the visibility trend
relative to air  pollution was carried out by  Neiburger 7 for down-
town Los  Angeles for the years 1933 through 1954.  From obser-
vations at  5:00 a. m.,  noon,  and 5:00 p. m.  a great many tabula-
tions of visibility by wind direction, relative humidity, time  of
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
78                      HOLZWORTH

day  season,  and year were prepared.   It was shown that the
frequency of very good visibilities decreased markedly as the
population and industry of the area grew.  After about 1947 to
1948, when the control  of pollutants was initiated, visibility
seems to have improved in spite of a continued increase of pop-
ulation and industry.  Neiburger concluded that these trends were
not due to  differences in the  weather.
      Using a similar type of analysis,  Robinson, Curie, and
James ^ considered noon visibilities at  downtown San Francisco
for the period 1933 to 1956.   They noted that for various visibi-
lity ranges the annual frequencies varied from year to year.
After restricting the  observations to cases of light wind and low
relative humidity, they concluded that it was difficult to observe
any long-term visibility trend related to air pollution.
      Holzworth and Maga ^  have suggested a  method for analyz-
ing  the trend of visibility.  This method,  which will be  illustra-
ted  here,  has been applied to data for Sacramento and Bakers-
field,  California,  with the conclusion that the visibility has
deteriorated at both cities, supporting the belief that air pollution
in California's Central Valley is increasing.   The method of
Holzworth and Maga was also applied to Neiburger's Los Angeles
data,  which were extended 5 years through 1959.  Before controls
were initiated,  a trend of rapidly declining visibility was indi-
cated for Los Angeles. After controls there was little trend in the
visibility.   From a control standpoint this latter is significant in
view of a  rapid rise in population and the attendant increase in
automobile emissions.
       The  method of trend analysis  suggested by Holzworth and
Maga will now be illustrated by  application to data for the muni-
cipal airport at Salt Lake City,  Utah.   Only hourly daytime ob-
servations (about 8:00 a.m.  to 5:00 p.m.) during periods with no
precipitation and with relative humidities less than 90 percent
are considered.  The total range of visibility is broken down into
a number  of sub-ranges,  and the percent frequencies of occur-
rence in each of these ranges is tabulated for each year.  The
advantage of considering the visibility by ranges rather than using
median or mean values is that the changes that occur can be de-
tected more precisely.  In the left portion of Figure 3,  the  per-
cent frequencies of visibilities in the indicated ranges are  plotted
for October of each year from 1946  to 1960.  There are some
rather large variations from year to year, but as a whole the
linear regression lines, fitted by the method of least squares,
depict the  general trend in each range fairly well.  In this  par-
ticular case there is a clear  trend of improving visibility.   The
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY
                                    79
 frequencies in the two higher visibility ranges  are both increas-
 ing,  while the frequencies  in the three lower ranges  are all
 decreasing.
   PER CENT FREQUENCIES OF
   VISIBILITIES IN GIVEN RANGES
   BY YEARS WITH LINEAR TREND LINE.

   64 j
   56--
              FLUX OF VISIBILITY
             FREQUENCY CHANGES
   FREQUENCY
--  1946
         1960
                                       --  34.6
                                                44.2
  NET
CHANGE
46   60
                                                        +9.6
FLUX OF RESULT-
 ANT CHANGES
                                                                -9.6
       46   48   SO   52   54  56   58   60
                                       --  28.9    55.8    +26.9 +  -36.5
                                                                           -9.6
                                          10.6     0.8     -9.8 +  -26.7
                                                                          -36.5
                                       --  14.4     0.7    -13.7 +  -13.0
                                                                          -26.7
                                       --  11.5
                                                -1.5
                                                       -13.0 +
                                                                           -13.0
       46
 Figure 3.  Percent frequencies of visibilities in given ranges by years (left), and schemat-
          ic shift of visibility frequency changes (right) at Salt Lake Municipal Airport
          in October.  Linear regression lines  fitted by method of least  squares.  Data
          based on daytime hourly observations; observations with precipitation and/or
          relative humidity greater than 90 per cent omitted.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
80                       HOLZWORTH

      But the matter may be pursued further in order to include
some numbers in the trend, and this will also  be helpful in.the
evaluation of more complicated trends.  For any one year the
total frequency of observed visibilities in all ranges is  100 per-
cent; this is true also for the frequencies determined from the
linear regression lines.  Therefore, the initial and terminal
points of the regression lines may be used  to obtain the net per-
centage frequency changes over the span of years considered, as
shown in the right portion  of Figure  3.  For instance, from the
regression line the frequency of visibilities in the range greater
than 30 miles  is 34. 6 percent in 1946 and in 1960 it is 44. 2 per-
cent.  The net change is plus 9. 6  percent,  and so on for the other
ranges.   The algebraic sum of the changes in  all ranges is zero,
and the increases  are compensated for by decreases elsewhere.

       But now it is important to consider how  such compensations
are likely to occur. A negative net change represents a surplus
of visibilities  in that particular range, and a positive change,  a
deficit.   The problem is to determine how the surpluses and de-
ficits in the various visibility ranges interact.

       The matter  of why the net frequency  changes in visibility
 ranges should interact may be considered from  another point of
 view. If other things are the same, when the concentration of
 visibility reducing materials changes, a similar effect  may be
 expected on all visibilities that would have occurred otherwise.
 Let us take the very simplified case of three visibility ranges,
 low, intermediate, and high,  each with frequency of occurrence
 of  33. 3  percent at some initial time.  At some later time if the
 general concentration of visibility reducing materials is less we
 may expect, for instance,  that 10. 0 percent of the frequencies
 that would otherwise have been poor are now intermediate, 10
 percent of the intermediate are high, and 10 percent of  the high
are just higher.  The result is that at the later time the resulting
frequencies are low: 23. 3 percent,  intermediate: 33. 3 percent,
and high 43. 3  percent. It would appear that the only visibilities
affected were  those in the upper and lower ranges.  But actually
there has  been a flux of  visibilities upward  to  higher ranges.
       Consider a case  of the visibility improving,  say,  from 3
to 25 miles.  Such changes are not discontinuous, but the visi-
bility passes continuously  through intermediate valves.   Cor-
respondingly,  with a trend of improving visibility, as in Figure
3, it is expected that the surpluses  (net frequency decreases)  in
the  lower visibility ranges are shifting upward to each next higher
range.  In each case the  amount shifted to the  adjacent  range is
algebraically added to the net change there and the resultant
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY                  81

value is shifted to the next range.  These resultant shifts are in-
dicated by the arrows in the right portion of Figure  3.  For in-
stance, in the lowest range, 0 to 6 miles,  the net change from
1946 to 1960 is minus 13. 0 percent.  This surplus is shifted up
to the next higher range,  7 to 12 miles, where it is  added to the
net change there,  minus 13. 7 percent.  The resultant is minus
26. 7 percent which is shifted up to the next range, 13 to 19 miles,
where the net change is minus 9. 8 percent.  The resultant change
in the  13-to-19 mile range is minus 36. 5 percent and this is shift-
ed to the 20~to-30 mile range, where the net change  is plus 26. 9
percent.   The resultant change in the 20-to-30 mile range is  minus
9. 6 percent, which, when shifted to the highest range,  greater
than 30 miles, just balances the net change there  of plus  9. 6
percent.   In Figure 3  it is shown that in all cases the resultant
shifts  (of  surplus frequencies) are all upward to higher visibility
ranges.  The  total resultant shift upward  is 85. 8 percent, and it
is clear that there is a marked trend of improving daytime visi-
bility at Salt Lake City in October.
      The visibility trend at Salt Lake  City was also  studied  for
December; the analysis is shown in Figure 4.  Here the major
visibility  changes are in the two upper ranges; the best visibili-
ties are declining in frequency and the second-best are increasing.
As shown on the right side of Figure 4, the total resultant shift
downward to lower visibility ranges is 18. 0 percent,  the total up-
ward to higher ranges is  2. 5 percent,  and the sum is 15.  5 percent
downward.  Therefore, there is a  slight trend  of deteriorating
visibility  in December.

      In view  of the improving trend in October this is surprising.
But a deeper look into the matter will indicate  that such opposing
trends are not without some basis. In 1941 Salt Lake City passed
an air pollution control ordinance, aimed primarily at reducing
smoke emissions.  It has been stated that emission of particulate
matter within Salt Lake City limits has been  reduced substantial-
ly as a result of enforecement activities.  ®  Natural  gas was
brought to the area about 1941,  and steady conversion from coal
to gas was responsible for much of the reduction in particulate
emissions.  It is significant that Salt Lake City is the only muni-
cipality in the state having an air pollution control ordinance. As
shown in Figure 5,  the city is located near the center of a large
intermountain valley.   This valley is developing rapidly.  It is
estimated that from 1940 to  1958 the population grew from
347, 000 to 632,000. 10
      In October, when there is a trend of improving visibility,
space heating is necessary,  especially at night. The  mean daily
maximum temperature for October is 66.  5 F and the minimum
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
82
                                HOLZWORTH
  PER CENT FREQUENCIES OF
  VISIBILITIES IN GIVEN RANGES
  BY YEARS WITH LINEAR TREND LINE
                                                     FLUX OF VISIBILITY
                                                    FREQUENCY CHANGES
                                                         NET
                                         FREQUENCY    CHANGE    FLUX OF RESULT-
                                                   1960     46    60
                                                    6.9    -16.5  +
                                          !_ 22.9     37.9   +15.0  +  -16.5
".I
 84
 ni
                    A
                              13-19 MILES
%f  6-8
  i L
                                                    8.6
                                                           +1.8  +
                                                                    -1.5
                                                                    -0.3
it —
'14-
1(H
8-
n -
• 7-12 MILES A
A A '

: X/^ "--*'"* V
I...J_I — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1_


- 13.9 15.8


                                                           + 1.9  +   -2.2
   60-
   52-
   44--
   36-
   28-
   20-'
   12-
   4--
         l   !  I   I  i  i   i  |   i  I  I  I   I  I
      46   48    50   52   54   56    58   60
                     YEARS
                                         33.0
                                                30.8
                                                        -2.2  +
Figure 4.  Percent frequencies of visibilities in given ranges by years (left), and schemat-
          ic shift of visibility frequency changes (right) at Salt Lake Municipal Airport
          in December.  Linear regression lines fitted by method of  least squares. Data
          based on daytime hourly observations; observations with precipitation and/or
          relative humidity greater than 90 per cent omitted.
                                        SEC TECHNICAL  REPORT A62-5

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY
83
     Figure 5. Salt Lake Valley, Utah. (Elevation contours in thousands of feet).


 is 39. 2  F.    The dispersive capacity of the atmosphere is much
 less at night than  during the day; low-level temperature  inver-
 sions are frequent at night,    and it is  estimated that the mean
 daily maximum  mixing depth is  1000 meters.  In the forenoon
 wind directions  are  primarily from the city area,  south-south-
 east, and in the afternoon from  the lake,  northwest.  With such
 a set of conditions a pattern of high pollution concentration in the
 morning with much lower  values during the  afternoon is  reason-
 able.
 SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
84
                          HOLZWORTH
Therefore, pollutants that reach the airport in the morning,  be-
fore the atmosphere is well-stirred, will be most effective in
reducing the visibility.  Figure 6 shows the percent frequencies
of visibilities  of 0 to 12 miles for each wind direction (for wind
speed of 1 to 10 mph in October.  Poor visibilities are by far
most frequent with winds from the direction of Salt Lake City,
from the sector east through south.  It is clear that Salt Lake
City is a direct source of poor visibilities at the airport during
October.  Recall that in Figure 3 the trend in frequency of visi-
bilities  in the  ranges  0 to 6 and 7 to 12 miles was  downward. The
fact that the visibility trend in October is upward reflects the
effectiveness  of the control program in Salt Lake City.
                                                        30
 Figure 6.  Wind rose of percent frequency for each wind direction for visibilities of 0-12
         miles at Salt Lake Municipal Airport in October. Data are the same as in
         Figure 3  except that only wind speeds of 1-10 mph are considered.


       The visibility wind rose for December,  shown in Figure 7,
is based on the same type of analysis as that in Figure 6.  Al-
though visibilities of 0 to 12 miles are most frequent with winds
from the northwest, there is no particular sector for which the
frequencies are especially greater than for others.  Therefore,
low visibilities are about as likely from one sector  as another.
It is concluded,  then,  that concentrated pollutants are trapped
in the valley for several days  at a time and simply recirculated,
Schmalz  3 nas explained such occurrences in association with
stagnating anticyclones over Utah,  especially in winter. He noted
that after about a week of stagnation, smoke (reported by pilots)
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY
85
extended from Salt Lake City to the Nevada State line,  110 miles
away.   Schmalz also noted the relationship between low visibili-
ties and wind direction,  shown in Figure 6.
 Figure 7. Wind rose of percent frequency for each wind direction for visibilities of 0-12
        miles at Salt Lake Municipal Airport in December. Data are the same as in
        Figure 3 except that only wind speeds of 1-10 mph are considered.

      In December the mean maximum mixing depth is estimated
to be 500  meters, just half of that in October.  Furthermore, the
lowest average wind speed of the year,  7. 4 mph, 3-1 occurs in
December.  With such a low dispersive capacity atmospheric
pollutants may be transported throughout the Salt Lake Valley
and remain in a relatively concentrated state throughout the day.
Therefore, pollution from various sources throughout the valley,
where there are no control ordinances,  is effective in reducing
the daytime visibility at  Salt Lake Airport in December.  At the
airport the effect of the control measures  is expected to be most
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
 86                      HOLZWORTH
 apparent in the forenoon,  whereas the effect of uncontrolled
 emissions is expected to be most apparent m the atternoon.
 Consequently,  the visibility improvement effected by control
 measures within Salt Lake City is overwhelmed by the uncon-
 trolled emissions from developing areas throughout the valley.
 And in December there is a trend of declining visibility in the
 daytime.
        Visibility data can be an important source of information
 in the evaluation of air pollution problems.  In some cases the
 conclusions reached are straightforward, in more complex
 situations, however,  additional information and more detailed
 analyses are  required.
                         REFERENCES

  1.  Week, F.  H. ,  1930:  Average Visibility at Chicago airport.
        Monthly Weather Review,  vol. 58, p. 204.
  2.  Robinson,  E.,  1962:  Effects of air pollution on visibility,
        Air Pollution, A Comprehensive Treatise, Edited by
        A. C. Stern, Academic Press,  New York.
  3.  Faith, W.  L. ,  1959:  Air Pollution Control, John Wiley,
        New York, p. 4.
  4.  Bloodworth, S. H., 1953:  The decreasing importance of
        smoke in reducing visibilities at Atlanta,  Georgia,
        Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol 34.,
        p.  78.
  5.  U. S.  Weather Bureau:  Terminal reference forecasting man-
        ual, available for various  stations in the U. S.,  Govern-
        ment Printing Office,  Washington, D. C.
  6.  American  Petroleum  Institute, 1959:  Petroleum Facts and
        Figures, American Petroleum Institute, p. 369.
  7.  Neiburger, M. ,  1955: Visibility Trend in Los Angeles, Air
        Pollution Foundation,  Rpt. No.  11,  Los Angeles, 45 pp,
  8.  Robinson,  E. ,  H.  Currie,  and H.  A. James, 1960:  Aspects
        of San Francisco visibility climatology, presented at 187th
        national  meeting Amer. meteor. Soc. ,   Eugene,  Oregon,
        June 14-16.
 9.  Holzworth, G. C.  and  J.  A.  Maga,  1960:   A method for
       analyzing the trend  in visibility,  Air Pollution Control
       Assn.  Journ. , vol.  10, pp. 430-436.
10.  U.S. Public Health Service,  1959:  A Review of the Air
       Pollution Situation in The Salt Lake Valley, Utah,  R. A.
       Taft Sanitary Engineering Center,  Cincinnati,  Ohio, 32 pp,
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON VISIBILITY                  87

11.  U. S. Weather Bureau, 1959:  Local Climatological Data
      with Comparative Data,  Salt Lake City, Utah, issued an-
      nually, Government Printing  Office,  Washington, D. C.
12.  Hosier, C. R. ,  1961: Low-level inversion frequency in
      the contiguous United States,  Monthly Weather Review,
      vol. 89,  pp.  319-339.
13.  Schmalz,  W. M.,  1947:  Some notes on visibilities at Salt
      Lake  City Airport,  Bulletin American  Meteorological
      Society,  vol. 28, ppT 179-186.
14.  Division of Smoke Regulation and Inspection, Dept. of
      Public Safety, City of Columbus, Ohio: 1960 Annual Report.
15.  Neiburger, M. , 1959: Meteorological aspects of oxidation
      type air pollution, The Rossby Memorial Volume, Rocke-
      feller Institute Press in association with Oxford University
      Press, New York,  pp.  158-169.
                       DISCUSSION

      PROFESSOR J.  O.  LEDBETTER:  How were the regres-
sion lines fitted?

      MR.  HOLZWORTH:  By the method of least  squares.
If you have reason to suspect that there is some other trend in-
volved, you can compute  other lines more detailed.  We have
done  this in a few cases but it doesn't lead to any improvement.

      MR.  LICHTBLAU:  Did you draw the conclusions on the
deterioration of visibility at Lake Charles, as indicated from
your  diagram?  Lake  Charles was outstanding.

      MR.  HOLZWORTH:  Yes,  the frequencies of poor
visibilities have increased  in recent years at Lake Charles. It
was brought  to my attention only recently, in a compilation made
here  at the Taft Center.  It is interesting to  consider which of
the cities that were listed have  any type of control,  and most of
them do.  Those that don't  have any control are Caribou, Maine;
Lake Charles, Louisiana; Pocatello, Idaho; and until very re-
cently Oakland,  California.  So Lake Charles is one of the cities
where there  are no controls.  What conclusions you draw from
this,  I am not sure.  It would probably depend on having more
data.
      DR. SCHMIDT:  It  may be of interest to you that  we  studied
the visibility from our light vessels that are  situated 10 to 20 or
perhaps 30 miles  out from  the coast.  Comparing visibility be-
fore and after the war, we  found a deteoriation of the visibility.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
cn                      HOLZWORTH
DO
      DR  HILST-  What is the-implication of before and after
the war, 'increased industrialization after the war?

      DR.  SCHMIDT:  Yes, sir.
      MR  WOHLERS:  I have a question.  I am not a  meteorolo-
gist.  You have given quite a  bit of data ranging from  1930 up to
1950  some odd,  at various stations.   How many men may have
been  on duty at those stations?
      MR. HOLZWORTH:  This is one of the matters that I hoped
to bring out in listing the difficulties of using visibility data --
some of the factors that go into this year-to-year variation that
you see.  The only way I think that the data can be used is to
assume that such  variations are random.  Obviously a great
number of different people have taken part in those observations,
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                  Smoke Concentrations in Montreal Related
                                  to Local Meteorological Factors

                                  PETER W. SUMMERS, Weather Engineering
                                  Corporation of Canada Ltd. and McGill
                                  University, Montreal
Summary
     Smoke concentrations in central Montreal have been measured by Weather Engineer-
ing Corporation since January 1960.  The seasonal variations are related to the changes
in atmospheric stability.  Early in 1961  measurements were started by McGill University
on the campus and on top of Mount Royal.  Data from the three locations are compared
and discussed in terms of the vertical distribution of smoke and  local topographical ef-
fects. The advantage of a "smokeless zone" is  clearly demonstrated. Some synoptic
situations producing high smoke concentrations are illustrated.  Application of these re-
sults  to similar locations in eastern Canada and the northern United States with a long
winter snow cover  is discussed.
      The first analysis of air pollution in Montreal in relation
to local meteorological variables was presented one year ago at
the Kingston meeting of the Royal Meteorological Society,
Canadian Branch.  Although based on a 4-month sample of smoke
concentration measurements from only one location,  in the down-
town area,  this study presented several interesting results and
some tentative conclusions.

      Since that time,  measurements have continued and the
seasonal and diurnal variations can now be analyzed in more de-
tail.  Measurements were  started at the MacDonald Physics
Building on the McGill University Campus at the end of January
1961 and on top of Mount  Royal at the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation transmitter building in the middle of March 1961.
The measurements from  these two sampling locations can now be
compared to determine the effects of the Mount Royal "smokeless
zone".   Also the measurements made at the top of  Mount  Royal
at a height  of 600 feet above the city can be used to evaluate the
effect of inversions on the vertical transport of pollution.  Some
preliminary results of these studies will be presented.

SAMPLING EQUIPMENT

      The equipment used for  these studies is the  Model E auto-
matic spot  sampler developed for the American Iron and Steel
Institute by Hemeon ^ and manufactured by the Research Appli-
ance Company of Pittsburgh.
                                 89

-------
90                         SUMMERS

      In sampling with this equipment, a known volume of outside
air is drawn through a given area of filter paper and the amount
of dust  and smoke  particles deposited in a given time is evaluated
by measuring the optical density of the soiled spot with a photo-
meter.  The method is described in full  detail elsewhere. 2

UNITS
      The optical density is  calculated as follows:

      Optical density (O. D. )     log   IP

where:
      I0    the intensity of transmitted light through the clean
            paper

      I    the intensity of transmitted light through the soiled
            paper

       For comparison with other samples the optical density is
 converted to a unit scale called the COH unit,  defined as follows:

       1  COH unit     100 x O. D.

       This value is  still dependent on the volume of air drawn
 through the filter paper.  If L is the quantity of air sampled ex-
 pressed  in thousands  of linear feet then:

       L    flow (cu. ft.  per min. ) x sampling time (min.)
                      1000 x area of spot (sq. ft. )

       The standard  unit used to express  smoke concentration is:

       COH units per 1000  linear feet    O. D.  x 100
                                              L

 INTERPRETATION OF COH UNITS

       The  New Jersey State Department of Health3 carried out an
 extensive statewide  survey of air pollution by means of smoke
 samplers in 1956.  On the basis of informed opinion they assigned
the following adjectival ratings to various levels of smoke con-
centration:
           Smoke Concentration          Adjectival Rating
       (COH units /1000 linear feet)
                   0-0.9              light
                 1.0   1.9              moderate
                 2.0 -  2.9              heavy
                 3.0   3.9              very heavy
                 4. 0 plus                extremely heavy
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5
                                                        GPO 8251II-*

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL                  91

      Many cities have recorded concentrations in the range of
8.0tol2.0 COH units for sampling periods of 2hours.  In Montreal
on April 14th, 1960, a maximum of 12. 8 was registered between
1900 and 2100 EST.  During one half-hour period from 1930 to
2000 EST a peak of 15.4 COH units was reached,  under a very
strong low-level warm frontal inversion.
      During a period of forest fires in the fall of 1952 concentra-
tions  produced by a mixture of forest smoke and urban smoke
reached 18. 0 COH units in Pittsburgh.  Areadingof 23. Ounits has
been reported from Sydney, Australia,  presumably from bush
fires  inland.

      The adjectival ratings have been used by several other
agencies and are used throughout this paper.

SAMPLING TIME

      The relation between the quantity of smoke in the atmos-
phere and the otpical density was found to be linear for values of
I less than 50 percent.   With the flow rate and spot size  used in
our samplers this  value often was exceeded for 2-hour samples in
the winter months.  Therefore, a standard 1-hour sampling period
was used at  all three locations from October to May. One-hour
samples have the added advantage of convenient correlation with
meteorological variables such as wind and temperature, which
are normally tabulated on an hourly basis in published summaries.

      During most of the first year the  Weather Engineering
sampler was operated on a 2-hour sampling period and was
changed to a  1-hour period only when necessary.  Thus some of
the data represent averages over a 2-hour sampling period.

LOCATION OF SAMPLERS
      The location of the three smoke samplers with respect to
Mount Royal and the downtown Montreal area is shown in
Figure 1, which also indicates the height  of the air intake
above sea-level.  The McGill and Weather Engineering intakes
are situated about  35 feet above the ground; the CBC intake is 12
feet above ground.

      The following abbreviations are used throughout:
      WEC    --    Weather Engineering Corporation
                    sampler located on Crescent Street

      McGill  --    McGill University  sampler located on the
                    Campus
      CBC    --    McGill University  sampler located in the

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
92
                           SUMMERS
                     Canadian Broadcasting Corporation building
                     on top of Mount Royal
                                       ?<,VWEATHER ENGINEERING (I851)
    SCALE IN MILES
            Figure 1.  Location of samplers with respect of Mount Royal
 SEASONAL VARIATION IN SMOKE CONCENTRATION

       Figure 2 shows a plot of the monthly averages at WEC
 from January 1960* to September  1961.  This figure indicates a
 very marked seasonal variation.   Readings remained in the top
 half of the heavy range from January to April 1960 and then fell
 sharply during May to relatively low readings from June to
 August.  Only in July, however,  did the monthly average fall into
 the light range.   Beginning in August the concentrations increased
 steadily, reaching the heavy range again by November.   During
 January 1961 concentrations reached a peak in the very heavy
 range.   From January on they declined steadily until May. During
 the summer of 1961 values  remained almost constant near 1.0
 COH unit.  September 1961 was the warmest on record in Montreal,
with a mean temperature  nearer to that expected in July  or
August; the smoke concentration during this month was lower by
27 percent than the  corresponding value for September 1960.

	There  are  two reasons for  the marked seasonal trend:
*Note the January 1960 average is  based  on 16 days only.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL
93
  3-0
  '2-0
o
§
o
F
0Ł
I-
Ł
K
8
                                                       VERY HEAVY
                                                            t
           •—• W.E.C.
           o—o MCQILL

           X-—X C.B.C.

           i  i   i  i  i  i  i
        J  FMAMJJASONDJ  FMAMJJAS
                  I960                        1961
                              MONTH
  Figure 2. Average monthly smoke concentrations in Central Montreal, January 1960 to
         September 1961

      1.  The emission of smoke into the atmosphere is much
          higher during the long winter heating season.

      2.  The ventilation of the city's air is severely restricted
          in the winter months because of the almost continuous
          stability of the atmosphere and frequent temperature
          inversions caused by snow-covered or frozen ground.

      These two factors combine to give smoke concentrations

•SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
94                         SUMMERS

in midwinter nearly three times those of midsummer.
      The effect of snow cover  on smoke concentrations in the
spring is shown in Figure  3.  This diagram shows a plot of the
  3-0
 x2-0
l
"" 1-0
                                                     I960
                                     1961-
          -i	1	1	1	1	1    i   i   i    i
       3  9   15  21  27  5  II  17 23 29  4  10  16 22  28  4  10  16
          FEBRUARY               MARCH             APRIL          MAY
                           MID-DATE OF 21-DAY RUNNING MEAN

    Figure 3.  Twenty-one-day running mean at WEC late winter and spring 1960, 1961

 21-day  running means  from February to mid-May for 1960 and
 1961.  The  readings are very close until about March 17th, when
 the 1961 readings began to fall below the corresponding 1960
 values;  by April 10th they were 0. 8 COH units lower. During
 April 1961 the smoke concentrations  averaged 24% lower than in
 1960:

       There are two possible reasons for this:  either less pollu-
 tion was emitted into the atmosphere during April 1961 or the
 dispersion of the pollution by the atmosphere was much greater.

       Since  the  mean temperature was 1. 0°F lower in 1961 the
 first reason can be  discounted.  Heating plants should have pro-
 duced about the  same amount of smoke, and  there is no  evidence
 of any reduction in emissions from other  sources such as trans-
 portation and industry.

       One must  look, then, for a meteorological reason to ex-
 plain the increase in ventilation.  The percentage variation in
 mean  wind speed and precipitation between the two Aprils was
 less than that for some of the other months,  February,  March
 and May; therefore winds or precipitation  cannot be the  cause.
 Synoptically  the  weather patterns were rather similar, with fre-
 quent storms in  both Aprils.  In the absence of any low-level
temperature soundings, the frequency of temperature inversions
cannot be determined accurately.

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
5MOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL                   95

     The  only significant difference between the two winters
vas the snow cover.  The total snowfall in Montreal in the 1959-
1960 winter season was 120 inches; in the 1960-1961  season it
Has only 86 inches.

     By March 8th, 1961, the snow cover at Dorval  Airport was
down to 2 inches and had disappeared from many parts of the
:ity.  Two heavy snowstorms  in mid-March increased the depth
again, but the last snow cover disappeared one week  earlier than
in 1960.   Throughout April there were frequent rains, which
speeded the thawing-out of the ground so that the chilling effect
of the ground on the air ended much earlier in 1961 than in 1960.
Thus the lowest layers of the atmosphere became unstable earlier
in 1961 and allowed increased ventilation, which  caused  the lower
smoke concentrations in April 1961.
     The  readings at McGill show exactly the same seasonal
trend, but the magnitude of the readings  is lower by a factor of
one-third to one-half.  This difference between the two locations
will be discussed later.

     The  few months of data available from the  CBC location
show little evidence of any marked seasonal variation.  The
average smoke  concentrations from April through September
have remained almost steady, whereas at WEC and McGill the
values have halved.  This suggests that although  much less
smoke is produced  in the  summer months, the increased vertical
mixing due to convection carries the smoke aloft more readily.
     In an earlier  report * it was shown  that during the period
January 15th  to April 30th,  1960,  the highest smoke concentra-
tions all occurred  under inversion conditions caused  either by
the advectionof warmer air from the south over the snow-
:overed ground or by low-level  warm frontal surfaces over the
=ity.
     The  stalling  of warm fronts just south of the St. Lawrence
ind Ottawa valleys  in the  winter months is a feature well-known
;o meteorologists in the area.  At times  this stagnation can lead
;o prolonged  spells of high smoke concentrations (well above 25
Dercent more than the 21-day running mean) as happened for
;5-l/2 days in February 1960.

     During  the 1960-61  winter season high readings again oc-
::urred in these circumstances,  but there was also a  much greater
'requency  of anticyclonic  weather,  which produced equally high
smoke concentrations.  It therefore appears that two frequently
occurring  types of weather situations can lead to extremely high
>ollution levels in  Montreal during the winter months.  In most
rther large cities only one situation,  the anticyclone,  regularly

iYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
96
                           SUMMERS
causes high pollution levels.  These meteorological influences
will be illustrated by examples.

DIURNAL VARIATION OF SMOKE CONCENTRATION
Seasonal Change in Week-day  Diurnal Variations at  WEC.
      A  study of the week-day diurnal curves for the months
January 1960 to September 1961 indicates the same basic daily
variation in every month.   Each day has two maxima (shortly after
sunrise  and in the evening) and two minima (early morning and
early afternoon).
      The shape of the  curves shows a continual transition from
month to month.  The curves can be classified into two basic
types, examples of which are illustrated in Figure 4.  Type A
       3-0
        2-0
         •0
                                                     TYPE A
                                                     DEC I960
               I   3579   II    I    3579
                     MORNING                      AFTERNOON
                              MID-TIME OF SAMPLE, E.S.T.
              Figure 4. Examples of weekday diurnal curves at WEC
                                 SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
5MOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL
                                                              97
ms a small diurnal amplitude of less than 35 percent.  The
naximum occurs in the morning; the early evening peak is near
md at times higher than the morning peak.  Type A occurs from
November through April.  Type B has a large diurnal amplitude
}f more than  50 percent with a strong peak in the morning.  It oc-
curs from May through October.

     In Figure  5 the  top curve shows the diurnal amplitude ex-
pressed as a  percentage of the monthly average and indicates a
    100


     80


     60


     40


     20


      0

     -10
                 •	•    DIURNAL  AMPLITUDE

                 X	X    MORNING  MAXIMUM-EVENING MAXIMUM
                 o	o    AFTERNOON  MINIMUM-OVERNIGHT MIN.
               F    M   A   M
A   S    0   N   D
                                J    J
                                  MONTH
  Figure 5. Diurnal amplitude, morning maximum minus evening maximum, afternoon min-
         imum minus overnight minimum as a percentage of average weekday values
pronounced seasonal variation.  In the winter months the atmos-
phere remains stable for most of the  day and overnight; hence
the diurnal variation is relatively small.  In the late spring and
particularly in the late summer  and fall.,  great stability develops
 SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
98                         SUMMERS

overnight and is followed by daytime instability leading to large
diurnal variations.  In mid-summer (July) the atmosphere tends
to remain unstable at times through the night hours or at least
develops no great stability.  This leads to somewhat smaller di-
urnal variations as  indicated in Figures 4 and 5.

      The middle curve on Figure 5 shows the difference between
the morning maximum and the evening maximum again  expressed
as a percentage of the average monthly smoke concentration.
This curve  indicates that the morning maximum is most pro-
nounced in the fall,  whilst in the winter there is little difference
between the two maxima.

      The bottom curve on Figure 5 shows that the two  minima
are almost of equal magnitude, although in the fall the lowest
readings tend to occur in the afternoon rather than overnight.

      A full explanation of the shape of these diurnal curves can-
not be given at this time.  The actual smoke concentration at any
given time  is a function of both the  rate of smoke production and
the rate of ventilation during the preceding few hours.   Both of
these vary throughout the day and although the diurnal changes
can be assessed subjectively,  the absolute magnitudes cannot be
obtained at present.

       The morning peak shortly after sunrise is generally ascribed
to a Hewson^ fumigation and although this undoubtedly occurs on
occasions in Montreal, the curves in Figure 4 show little indica-
tion of this on the average.  Rather there is an almost steady in-
crease in concentration from 0200 EST until shortly after sunrise,
The gradual buildup probably occurs because during these hours
more pollution is produced than can be ventilated. The rate of
ventilation  increases sharply after  sunrise and more than offsets
the big increase in  production due to daytime traffic and industry
until late afternoon.  By late evening the rate of ventilation has
fallen off again but  is still greater than the rate  of production
after man's  daytime activities have ceased.   Pollution therefore
falls to a minimum again shortly after midnight.

Comparison of Week-day with  Week-end Diurnal Variations at
WEC.

      From November through March the day-to-day variations
in pollution are so large that even with a sample of 30 observations
at any given time for  each day of the week no significant variations
were found.

      Average values of smoke concentration were found to be lOfi
lower on week-ends, but the individual diurnal curves were very
erratic.   Once a larger sample is obtained allowing the effects of
random day-to-day  meteorological changes to be supressed then

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL
                99
a comparison can be made between rates  of production of pollu-
tion on week-days and week-ends.
      During the summer months June to  August 1960 and  1961
the day-to-day variation in the meteorological variables was not
so great.  Although the sample consisted  of only 26  observations
for each day of the week, significant variations  were found be-
tween week-ends and week-days.  The daily average was higher
for every week-day than for the  week-end.  On Saturdays the
average smoke concentration was  20 percent less than on week-
days; on Sundays it was  25 percent less.  The curves  are shown
for comparison in Figure 6.
       1-6
      0-8
      0-4
                                                  week  days
                                                  Saturdays
                                           x	x Sundays
                     5   7
                     MORNING
579
AFTERNOON
                            MID-TIME OF SAMPLE, E.S.T.
Figure 6.  Comparison of weekday with weekend diurnal variations at WEC for the summer
        months June to August 1960, 1961
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
100                       SUMMERS

      If we assume that the factors affecting ventilation are the
same on week-days as  on week-ends., then the differences between
the curves in Figure  6  must be explained in terms of differing
rates of production of pollution.  We know that industrial activity
is much less over the week-end and that the  flow of traffic is very
different.
      Perhaps the most significant feature of Figure 6  is the
complete breakdown  of the normal diurnal variation on Sunday.
There is no morning peak because most of man's  activities are
at a standstill in the  early hours of Sunday.

Comparison of Diurnal Variations at Top and Bottom of Mount
Royal

      By April 1961 the sampler on top of Mount Royal was op-
erating on a regular  basis.  The 1-hourly readings are compared
with those at Me Gill  for the month of April.  This small sample,
based on 20  days, could not be combined with observations for
May since the change to Daylight Saving Time shifts the daily
cycle of production one hour with respect to  the daily cycle of
ventilation.

      Figure 7 is an  example of the type of comparison that may
be made when more data become available.

      The Me Gill curve shows  evidence  of a  Hewson fumigation
immediately after sunrise between 0500 and  0600 EST.

      The maximum  at the top  of Mount  Royal at 0800 EST indi-
cates a lag of 2 hours after the overnight stability has broken
down sufficiently to allow maximum transfer of pollution up to
that level.

EFFECT OF MOUNT ROYAL "SMOKELESS
   ZONE" ON SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS

      Nine hundred and fifty-seven simultaneous hourly obser-
vations of smoke concentration for week-days only at WEC and
Me Gill  during February and March 1961 were tabulated accord-
ing to the wind directions recorded at Dorval Airport.  The
mean concentrations  for each of the eight cardinal compass
points are shown in Table 1.  The following conclusions can be
made from this table:

      1.  Averaged over the quadrant north through east to
         south, where  the Mount Royal smokeless zone can have
         no effect, the smoke concentrations at Me Gill are 33
         percent lower than at  WEC.   The reason is that the im-
         mediate surroundings pf Me Gill have fewer sources of
         pollution.

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL
                                                      101
   1-2
z
LU
(J
  0-8
  0-4
     0
                       CBC
_L
              SUNRISE
J_
                                     SUNSET
                                       J
                                       LL
                                                _L
         I
         5   7
          MORNING
              I
I
                                      J   5   7  9   I
                                            AFTERNOON
                        END-TIME OF SAMPLE, E.S.T.
Figure 7. Comparison of diurnal variations at top and bottom of Mount Royal for April
       1961
    2. When winds are tabulated on a  16-point compass the
       greatest frequency is from the west-southwest rather
       than southwest (see Figure 8); the majority of the
       southwest winds shown in Table I are  really west-
       southwest winds.  With winds  from this  direction the
       air  at the McGill Sampler has passed  over Westmount
       Summit Park and skirted Mount Royal Park  and has
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
102                        SUMMERS
          picked up very little pollution during the last 2 miles of
          its trajectory.  Thus the Me Gill readings drop to 0.8
          COH units.  With southwest winds the buffering effect of
          the smokeless zone is not felt at WEC, where the average
          concentration is 2. 7 COH units.
                           TABLE I

        EFFECT OF MOUNT ROYAL "CLEAN AREA" ON
       SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS AT WEC AND  McGILL
             DURING FEBRUARY AND MARCH 1961

               _N    NE   _E_   SE   _S_  SW    W   NW Calm
 Percentage
 Frequency    15   20    55     6     6   31    14     3    1/2

 Mean Wind
 Speed,  mph   9.8  14.2  10.3   11.2  7.7  13.4 15.4  9.8
 Mean Smoke
 Concentration
 at WEC,
 COH units     3.4   2.9  3.3   2.9  3.9  2.7  1.6  1.8  4.1

 Mean Smoke
 Concentration
 at Me Gill,
 COH units     2.2   1.9  2.4   2.0  2.6  0.8  0.6  1.4  3.5

      3.  The Me Gill site has even better protection with winds
          from the west, and concentrations drop to 0. 6 COH
          units.  At WEC the west winds have passed over the
          edge of the Park, and concentrations drop to 1.6 COH
          units.

      4.  With northwest winds both McGill and WEC are pro-
          tected by the Park, and smoke concentrations are
          similar.

      5.  In calm conditions the Park has no effect and readings
          at both locations are high.

          Even without the Park, winds from southwest through
          north could be expected to  give lower smoke concentra-
          tions because stability is lower and ventilation is there-
          fore increased, (see Figure 8).

     A similar analysis has  been  done for June to August 1961.
This analysis shows the same general trend in variations of
smoke concentration but with the following important differences:

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL
                                                                       103
 24% SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE
    ATMOSPHERE
    No temperature liwerslor
    Clean Arctic air,
    Goad Vortical Mixing.
    Low Pollution Potential
                          777A- HEAVY INDUSTRY
40% STABLE ATMOSPHERE
   Frequent strong tempera-
   ture Inversions.
   No Vertical Mixing
   High Pollution Potential
  32% NEUTRAL TO SLIGHTLY
    STABLE ATMOSPHERE
    No temperature Inversions.
    But only slight Vertical
    mixing.
    Light to Moderate
    Pollution  Potential.
                                                        4% CALM WINDS
                                                          No Horizontal or Vertical
                                                          Mixing
                                                          High Pollution Potential
              Note: These composite wind data are for the months November to April
                   for the 10-year period 1947 to 1956 at Dorval Airport and were
                   supplied by the Meteorological Branch, Department of Transport.
   Figure 8. Location of heavy industry on Island of Montreal together with the wind fre-
           quencies for the months November to April
       1.
       2.
           Averaged over the quadrant north through  east to
           south the smoke concentrations  at  McGill are only  16
           percent lower than those at WEC.
           With southwest and west winds the reduction at  McGill
           is only 45 percent, compared  to a reduction of 60 to  70
           percent in the  winter.
       These values indicate that although Mount Royal has an
appreciable effect in the summer,  it is  not nearly so marked as
in the winter.  This is to be expected,  since a much larger, pro-
portion of the total smoke in summer is due to the more distant
industrial sources  rather than to local  household  and  commercial
heating plants.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                           SUMMERS
RELATION OF SMOKE  CONCENTRATIONS TO
SYNOPTIC FEATURES ON THE WEATHER MAP

      Two cases will be discussed to illustrate how changes in
the synotpic features of the weather map affect the smoke con-
centrations in Montreal.

Prolonged Spell  of Anticyclonic Weather,  March 20th to 24th,
1961

      The surface weather maps during this period are shown in
Figures 9 to  11.  An Arctic  cold front passed through Montreal
      Figure 9. Surface Weather Map
           0100 EST 20 March 1961
late on March 19th, and the high-pressure area drifted slowly
southeast from James Bay to a position just east of Montreal by
the morning of the 22nd.  The vertical temperature structure at
Maniwaki, Quebec, (about 125 miles northwest of Montreal)
during this  period is shown in Figure 12.  At 1200 G. M.T. (0700
EST) on the  20th the profile shows a shallow layer of cold air up
to 940 mb.   By the 21st subsidence associated with the high and
advection of warmer air aloft,  combined with strong nocturnal
cooling at the ground,  had created an extremely strong tempera-
ture inversion of  16°C in  the lowest 600 feet of the atmosphere.
This inversion persisted for three days,  but by the 23rd its
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATION IN MONTREAL
105
                               -
                                               •
      Figur. 11. Surtoc. W.otKct Map
             0100 EST 24 Morch 1961
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
106                        SUMMERS

magnitude had decreased to 9° C in the lowest 400 feet.

      On the 24th the high had moved off to the east as a small
low drifted across  New England from the west,  and the anti-
cyclonic inversion  had completely disappeared.  The cold front
moved down  rapidly from the northwest and passed through
Montreal early on the 25th.
   700
  800
  900
 1000
                                                    I200Z
                                                    22 MARCH
                                 J_
         -20
-10
                              TEMPERATURE, "C

     Figure 12. Vertical temperature profiles at Maniwaki -- March 20-24, 1961
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATION IN MONTREAL                   107

      The pollution record during this period for WEC and CBC
is shown in Figure 13.   The readings at McGill were in very close
agreement with WEC and so are omitted from the diagram.  Un-
fortunately, the CBC sampler was not operating at the beginning
  8-0
I e-o
  2-0
•«••      '        '         M      A/V \   A^
                            ]    \  .  /       V/^T


                                                          \A
       12  18  00  06  12   18 00 06  12  18  00  06  12  18  OO 06  12  18 00
        MARCH 20       MARCH 21        MARCH 22         MARCH 23        MARCH 24
                            END-TIME OF SAMPLE, E.S.T.
 Figure 13. Smoke concentrations at WEC and CBC during prolonged spell of anticyclonic
         weather, March 20th - 24th, 1961
of the period.  The morning peak occurred at WEC at varying
times between 0400 and 1000 EST on each of the four mornings.
      At CBC the concentration dropped to near zero at about
0600  EST on the 22nd and 23rd, an indication that the inversion
was below the top of Mount Royal.
      Between 1200 and 1300 EST on the 23rd the temperatures
at Dorval Airport increased by 9° F indicating the final break-
down of the  inversion.   With only very light winds and a slightly
stable atmosphere  (see  Figure 12), the concentration was again
high at  WEC on  the morning of the 24th.   At  the top of Mount
Royal,  however, readings remained relatively high through the
night of the  23rd/24th in the absence of the inversion.  Smoke
concentrations finally fell off on the night of  24th/25th because of
freshening westerly winds and the passage of the cold front,  which
brought in clean Arctic  air.
      It is interesting to note the differences between the minimum
temperatures recorded  at the McGill Observatory and Dorval
Airport during this period:
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
108
Date

March 21
        22
        23
        24
       SUMMERS

    Minimum
Temper ature^F

Dorval   Me Gill
    2
   10
   10
   3 1
11
14
26
34
                                                     Temperature
                                                     Difference, °F
 9
 4
16
 3
       There is no doubt that smog is  one of the factors that con- |
tributes to large differences in temperatures between cities and »
the surrounding countryside on a night of strong nocturnal radia-
tion cooling.  In Figure 13 the average smoke concentration is
lower during the night of  the 21st/22nd than on the preceding and
following nights and could account for the much lower tempera-
ture  difference.   Cloud cover  on the night of 23rd/24th produced
a general restriction in nocturnal cooling.

 Variations in Smoke Concentrations during the Passage of a
 Storm
       Figure  14 shows the variations at WEC and McGill during
 the period February 12th to 15th,  1961.  At this time the sampler
   6-0 -
         ANTICYCLONIC
      _  INVERSION
                                                MARITIME
                                 WEAK  ARCTIC   / TROWAL
                                 WARM  FRONT
                                "          \\  ^
     12   18    00   06   12   18   00   06   12   18  00  06   12
         FEE 12            FEB 13               FEB 14           FEB 15

                             END-TIME OF SAMPLE, E.S.T.

 Figure  14.  Variations of smoke concentration at WEC and McGill during passage of ridge
          of high pressure and storm, February 12th - 15th, 1961


                                 SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL
                                                      109
had not been installed on Mount  Royal.  The surface weather maps
are shown in Figures  15 through 17.
  -rx^"~ /   V'
t,  ,,"*>^v-c   V
*•-v   B iis»   T
 SjK- /-Kt- l>
      15*,*  *Ł&*
 *
                  **\'^^~
   , *&jgsi!^^jaup|Ł
:"'/    /A^  ttr^Ł^^-
    Figure 15. Surfaco Weather Map
          0100 EST 13 Feb. 1961
     Smoke concentrations were extremely high on the morning
of the 13th under a strong anticyclonic inversion.   On this occasion
the minimum temperature at Dorval Airport was -6°F compared
to  8°F at the Me Gill Observatory.

     At noon on the 13th the winds at Dorval increased to 15 mph
from the east or northeast,  but smoke concentrations remained
high under a warm frontal inversion.  At 2100 EST a weak Arctic
warm front (not shown on Figures 12 and 13) passed through
Montreal.  It was followed by a strong southerly gradient with
southeast winds between 15  and 20 mph, which produced low
smoke  concentrations.  With the approach of a trowal (shown
as an occlusion  on Figure 16) the surface winds decreased and
the increased stability due to over-running warm air at low
levels produced another sharp peak in pollution at  1000 EST.  For
the remainder of the day winds were steady from the southwest at
20 mph, but  the concentrations at  VVEC did not decrease signifi-
cantly until after the passage of the Arctic  cold front at midnight,
which brought westerly winds at 20 to 30 mph.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
110
                           SUMMERS
      The lower concentrations at McGill during the after-
noon and evening of the 14th are due to the effects of Mount
Royal.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL
                                                            111
 *"?rv  -^^^^-^
 .** "* ***P_T..>    - 1 7   . ^^^-^f ""_*• -<•?
     Figur* 17. Surface Weather Map
           0100 EST 15 F«b. 1961
Summary and Conclusions
      The preceding analysis clearly  shows that the seasonal
and daily variations of smoke concentration in central Montreal
are intimately related to changes in the meteorological variables.
In particular the effect of winter snow cover is very important in
that it produces almost continuous stability and frequent tempera-
ture inversions in the lowest levels of the atmosphere at a time of
the year when the emission of pollution is at a maximum.

      The problem is  further aggravated by the relative location
of the  heavy industrial areas in Montreal.  Pollution from these
industrial sources  is blown directly across some or all of the
business and residential  sections of the Island during the 40 per-
cent of the time in  the winter months,  when the atmospheric con-
ditions are least able  to disperse it.   This is illustrated diagram-
aticallv in Figure 8.*
      The advantage of a "smokeless  zone" such as Mount Royal
Park  is very evident  in that  pollution  concentrations in the sur-
rounding areas are reduced  considerably.
*Wind frequencies were compiled from data supplied by the
 Meteorological Branch,  Department of Transport.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
112                       SUMMERS

      Although strong inversions form in Montreal under anti-
cyclonic weather conditions, they occur just as frequently due to
the advection of warm air at low levels in the atmosphere over
the cold ground.
      The second effect is most pronounced at a location which:
      1. has a long and continuous period of snow cover;
      2. lies in  a valley orienated in a general east to west
         direction so that cold air is either trapped or funnelled
         in at ground level;
      3. is near to or north of the main winter storm tracks to
         provide frequent periods of low-level warm air ad-
         vectation just above  the cold air.
      Montreal,  with a population of 2 million,  is the largest
urban area in North  America to satisfy all the requirements for
a pronounced inversion of the  second type,  a factor that hitherto
has not been  considered in air pollution studies.  Since these
conditions probably occur in other rapidly growing urban areas
in central  Canada and the northern United States,  they  should be
taken into  account for urban planning and the location of industrial
plants.
                         REFERENCES

     Denison, P. J. , B. A. Power and P-W.  Summers,  "Analyses
       of Air Pollution Levels in Montreal Related to Meteorological
       Variables, " presented at Kingston Meeting, Royal Meteoro-
       logical Society,  June  1960  (unpublished).
     Hemeon, W. C. L. ,  George F. Haines,  Jr. and Harold H. Ide,
       "Determination of Haze and Smoke Concentrations by Filter
       Paper Samplers, " Journal Air Pollution Control Assn.,
       Vol.  3, No.  1,  pp.22.  August 1953.
     New Jersey State Department of Health, "State-wide Air Pollu-
       tion Survey -- Smoke Index, " 1958.
     Hewson, E. Wendell, "Atmospheric Pollution, "  Compendium
       of Meteorology,  pp.  1147,  1951.
                         DISCUSSION

      DR.  HEWSON:  Do you have other examples  of trapping
below warm fronts, especially slowly moving warm-front

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SMOKE CONCENTRATIONS IN MONTREAL                  113

systems?  It seems to me that this is a situation in which one
might expect quite high concentrations.  You had one brief period
of it during your study.

      MR.  SUMMERS:  Yes, we did a study in the first winter,
and we found that 20 percent of the time the air was being
trapped under a warm front.  This trapping effect is quite a well-
known feature of the St.  Lawrence and Ottawa valley region.   It
can persist for several hours,  and on one occasion did persist for
2-1/2 days, a very high concentration.

      DR.  HILST:  In your comparison of the McGill station and
the effect of the Mount Royal Park, you pointed out that the McGill
station was affected first,  then it improved; the concentrations
there went quite low, while yours stayed up.  But then when you
were both affected,  their concentrations came up, rather than
yours coming down.  Do you have any explanation for this?

      MR.  SUMMERS:  Not really, except that with the north-
west wind the air is not blowing directly across the mountain but
is going around the mountain, which would  possibly affect it.  This
occurred in a very small percentage  of the time,  4 percent.   It
was a very small sample.
      DR.  SCHMIDT:  Mr. Summers, you talked about that
morning maximum,  and you  talked a  bit of  the cause of that
maximum.  Did you also see something of a shift throughout the
year ?
      MR.  SUMMERS:  Yes.  The shift occurred within 2 hours
after sunrise.  And about 4 hours in  the midwinter.

      MR.  MUNN:  I have some comments  about the evening peak
that might  be helpful.  Recently I have been looking at data from
a 200-foot  tower in Ottawa, and also  from a tower at Douglas
Point in Ontario.   We have found that in the early evenings,  under
light-wind, high-pressure situations,  the inversion forms later on
in the evening. The inversion  doesn't collapse completely, but it
diminishes somewhat, and comparable with this  the wind at 200
feet is a maximum in the  afternoon.  It decreases in the early
evening when the  inversion reduces in intensity,  and in the late
evening the 200-foot wind increases.   It is  at that point that the
pollution level goes up.  I have  found that the 200-foot wind in-
crease is a very good predictor of an evening peak.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                   The Air Over Philadelphia

                                   FRANCIS K. DAVIS, Jr., Professor of
                                   Physics, Drexel Institute of Technology and
                                   Staff Meteorologist, WFIL-TV
Summary
     Simple air pollution theory indicates that relatively few meteorological and air
quality observations are necessary in general air pollution studies.  Even these relative-
ly few observations are usually lacking, however, in studies of the behavior and quality
of the air over a particular city.  The observations of meteorological quantities related to
air pollution should be standardized and the number of observations increased.  Theory
should be extended to include the complications brought about by characteristics of urban
areas. At the same time, some useful rules for forecasting and regulating air pollution
can be formulated for a city such as Philadelphia on the basis of currently available ob-
servational data.
THE PROBLEM
      A steadily increasing population and a continuing trend to-
ward industrialization within that population have resulted in an
ever-increasing volume of the various waste products being poured
into the atmosphere.  Wanta and Stern (1957) point out that 21 per-
cent of the world's people now live in cities with populations  of
20, 000 or greater and that by the middle of the next century the
number will have increased to 90 percent.  The population of the
United States is increasing at a  rate  of 15 percent per decade,
and the amount of energy expended per person is  increasing
yearly.

      In spite of engineering efforts to reduce  air pollutants to
their least offensive form, they could become,  if they are not
already,  a very serious health and economic problem in the Phil-
adelphia area and in many other areas.   Maneri and Megonnell
(1960) describe the  result of three  statewide surveys of the extent
and seriousness of air pollution in  New York.   Although these sur-
veys were made independently by different agencies and with dif-
ferent techniques, a composite conclusion was  reached:  "Air
pollution  is a widespread complaint in New York State communi-
ties of all sizes,  and its abatement and control receive too little
attention. "
      When waste products have been discharged into the atmos-
phere, their subsequent life  history is a  meteorological problem.
Even though pollutants are put into the atmosphere at a constant
rate, the condition of the atmosphere will determine whether
these contaminants  accumulate to  cause  discomfort and damage

                                115

-------
116                          DAVIS

or disperse enough that no problem results.  Atmospheric condi-
tions also determine whether such a problem will be localized in
one  small section of the community or will be widespread.  Cer-
tainly any wise city planning activity should consider local weather
conditions and their relation to air pollution when zones are set
for industrial and residential development.

DIFFUSION PARAMETERS

      When contaminants are released at a particular point, the
atmosphere acts as its own cleansing agent by transporting and
diffusing such contaminants,  thus reducing their concentrations.
A complete mathematical analysis of diffusion processes which
would allow quantitative calculations is difficult.  Diffusion equa-
tions are available from several sources,  some of the  most widely
used being those developed by Sutton (1932, 1947).   Such equations
indicate that for a given contaminant emission the properties of
the  atmosphere of primary concern in determining concentrations
at any point are wind speed, wind direction, and air stability as
reflected by the temperature profile in the vertical  direction.
Very recent observations reported by  Maneri and Megonnell (1960),
Boettger (1961), Dickson (1961), Markee (1961), and Turner(1961)
tend to confirm this indication.  For example, Dickson reports a
significant correlation of atmospheric pollution with all three
properties; Markee reports high correlations between  certain
pollution levels and vertical temperature differences in Louis-
ville;  and Turner reports that the meteorological variables of
wind speed,  temperature,  and stability account for about half of
the  variance in daily city-wide sulfur dioxide concentrations and
soiling indices in Nashville, Tennessee.

DATA REQUIREMENTS
       Relating meteorological parameters to air pollution concen-
trations in a given city is not a simple job.  Although most large
cities across the nation make air pollution measurements of some
kind, there are no fixed standards for the type of measuring in-
struments to be used,  for the general location and height at which
such measuring instruments are exposed,  or for the atmospheric
conditions under which such measurements should be made. As
a result,  collection and comparison of pollution data in an effort
to consider relative pollution levels in various cities across the
nation, and even within a single city,  are almost meaningless.
It is highly desirable to accumulate data that would lead to stand-
ardization of pollution-measuring instruments and techniques so
that  a picture of pollution distribution on a nationwide basis and
within a city can be established. Furthermore, Hemeon (1958)
points out that we have yet to determine which of the many air

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
THE AIR OVER PHILADELPHIA                            117

pollution effects are objectionable, and that from an engineering
viewpoint we have no objective basis for evaluating these air pol-
lution nuisances.

      In the meteorological department, measurements of wind
speed and direction are available  at many U.S. Weather Bureau
Stations.  These measurements, however, are frequently made
at relatively high levels,  often at  airports located at some dis-
tance from urban areas and in topographical surroundings quite
different from the urban area they represent.   Low-level wind
flow patterns throughout urban areas ought to be much more def-
initely understood under conditions of high pollution potential.
      The vertical temperature structure  of the air over a city is
probably as important as the wind data in  analysis of pollution
problems.   But in most cities no vertical  temperature measure-
ments are available.  The vertical temperature distribution must
be inferred from other measurements.  For example,  Turner
(1961),  in his Nashville study, proceeded  on the premise that sta-
bility depends mainly on net radiation and wind speed and that net
radiation is determined by the elevation of the sun and by the
amount and height of cloud cover.  He used these parameters to
set up a stability classification.

      Observations of the vertical temperature profiles have been
made recently over Louisville,  Kentucky.   DeMarrais (1961) re-
ports that these data show that stability conditions over an urban
complex are quite different from those over open areas, where
most other observations have been made.

      Thus, it would also be highly desirable to standardize and
increase the meteorological observations  related to air pollution
and to extend the observations and the theory to cover the com-
plications brought about  by the physical characteristics of urban
areas.

METEOROLOGY OF THE PHILADELPHIA AREA

      Although there is great need for additional meteorological
and air pollution measurements to define more clearly the rela-
tionships between the two, existing observations and knowledge
can often be combined and used to gain a greater measure of
understanding of the air  pollution problem in a particular city.  In
Philadelphia we recently undertook an investigation of the weather
influences on urban air pollution with the aim of determining
whether periods of potentially high air contamination might be
anticipated on the basis of changing weather patterns.
      To establish some of the detailed weather patterns for
Philadelphia, a collection of hourly surface weather observations

SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
118                          DAVIS

taken at the Philadelphia Weather Bureau Station at International
Airport was  analyzed.  Through the cooperation of the National
Weather Records Center in Asheville, North Carolina,  these rec-
ords were acquired in the form of WBAN- 1 punch cards suitable
for machine  computations.  They cover the period July 1949
through June 1959.

      Studies such as those by Kleinsasser and Wanta (1956),
Machta, Scott,  and Korshover (1958), Keagy and Schueneman
(1958), Neiburger (1959), and Niemeyer (1960) indicate that light
winds  are very highly correlated with high  degrees of atmospher-
ic pollution.   Analysis of the  Philadelphia data shows that the
period of lightest winds is summer and  fall,  particularly late
summer and early fall.  This coincides with  the period of max-
imum  frequency of clear  skies at night, which contribute to low-
level cooling at night and to high stability.  The large-scale
weather observations indicate that poorest  diffusion conditions in
the Philadelphia area occur in the late summer and early fall and
generally are associated  with winds from the southwest.  The late
summer and fall  are potentially the seasons of greatest air pollu-
tion risk in  Philadelphia on the basis of low wind speeds, or low
ventilation rate,  alone.  A detailed analysis of the general mete-
orological patterns for Philadelphia is presented in a report pub-
lished by the Air Pollution Control Section, Department of Public
Health,  City of Philadelphia [Davis (1960)J.

RELATION OF HIGH POLLUTION LEVELS TO
METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS
       In an effort to relate air pollution conditions in Philadelphia
to weather conditions and weather patterns, dates of high particu-
late concentration in Philadelphia were  obtained for the years
1957 through 1959.  The particulate concentrations were recorded
at two sites  by high-volume and AISI samplers.  The basis for
classifying a daily reading as high was arbitrarily set at 1. 5 times
the monthly  average.   Since the list of dates  selected on this basis
was quite long,  an additional criterion was imposed:  the high-
pollution  dates must cover a period of 2 to  5  days  in which read-
ings for at least one of the days were high at both  sampling sites
and on both sensing devices.

      This list totals 24 "episodes" covering 68 days, a little over
6 percent of  the days in the 3-year period.  The original list, how-
ever,  included 125 days,  or more than 11 percent of the total days.
Seasonally, the distribution shows eight "episodes" in the winter
months,  four in the spring,  two in the summer,  and eight in the
fall.

      The general weather patterns associated with each of these

                               SEC TECHNICAL  REPORT A62-5

-------
THE AIR OVER PHILADELPHIA                            119

pollution periods were investigated.  Although these patterns
were varied, some characteristics were persistent.  On the basis
of these a forecasting system could be set up to provide a warning
when weather conditions likely to aggravate air pollution problems
are developing.  These conditions have a typical general history:
a continental polar high-pressure center moves out of Canada
across the Great Lakes, sometimes going slowly across New York
State and off the Northeast coast,  sometimes down into the  Ohio
Valley and eastward across the Middle Atlantic area to the  Mid-
east or Northeast  coast.  These highs become stationary or very
slow-moving at the coast,  and the Philadelphia area is influenced
by very light winds for several days.  During most of that period
the high-pressure  center is generally to the  east, so the air flow
is predominantly from a direction between southeast and south-
west, with southwest heavily predominant.
      Wind speeds during the  problem periods were predominantly
less than 8 mph; during 15 of  those periods such speeds were re-
corded continuously for 14 hours or longer.  High pollution levels
were recorded with somewhat higher wind speeds in the spring
season.
      To associate wind directions with high pollution "episodes'1
more specifically, the hourly wind directions were tabulated for
these periods.  Figure  1 shows a composite  wind rose for these
high pollution periods.  The high percentage of winds from  west-
southwest through  south is apparent.
      Because of the higher wind speeds associated with the spring
episodes (March,  April, and May), the high  pollution periods for
those months were analyzed separately.   The over-all pattern for
wind direction is not greatly changed, but the predominance of
southwesterly winds is  even stronger.  Figure 2 shows the  wind
rose associated with high pollution episodes  in the spring.

RELATION OF LOW POLLUTION LEVELS TO
METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS
      The weather conditions  related to low levels of air pollution
in Philadelphia were studied for the same 3-year period.  Low
levels were  determined by records from the same samplers and
were arbitrarily set at  0. 6 of the monthly average or lower.  The
list included only those dates  for which low readings were record-
ed at both locations.  This list was heavily weighted with dates
that fell on Saturdays and Sundays; these dates were eliminated
because studies by the Air Pollution Control Section have demon-
strated that  the dramatic lowering  of air pollution levels on week-
ends results from  reduced community activity rather than from
meteorological factors.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
120
                             DAVIS
           NW
    W —
            SW
                                                    NE
                                                          — E
                                                    SE
   Figure 1.  Percentage of wind directions during periods of high pollution, 1957-1959-

      These periods of low pollutant levels showed a very con-
sistent weather pattern dominated by high, gusty winds and fresh
continental polar air.  Most often the weather map showed a low
pressure center near the mideast or northeast coast and a high
center west of the Philadelphia area.  Winds were thus from a
direction between northeast and northwest,  mostly northwest,
with speeds often around 20 mph  and gusts over 30 mph.

VENTILATION RATES
      The horizontal motion of the air transports pollutants across
the city.   Contaminants put into the  air may be  spread out verti-
cally so that surface concentrations  will be low if the air is un-
stable.   If wind speeds are high,  concentrations will be relatively
low because the volume of air into which the pollutants are dis-
charged is large.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
THE AIR OVER PHILADELPHIA
                                                             121
           NW
                                                      HE
         SW
                                                    SE
  Figure 2. Percentage frequency of wind directions during high pollution periods in the
         spring season 1957-1959-

      If we assume that contaminants put into the air in and
 around Philadelphia are all  discharged at levels below 500 feet
 and that under stable conditions they remain within that layer, the
 maximum allowable discharge rates can be estimated crudely for
 certain wind speeds.
      The average wind speed in Philadelphia is between 9 and 10
 mph.  Wind speeds of less than  8 mph are recorded 37 percent of
 the time, and speeds of 12 mph  or less are recorded 73 percent
 of the time.  On this basis it seems reasonable to use a speed of
 10 mph as a first approximation in computing an average ventila-
 tion rate.  Wind speeds of this magnitude and less are often asso-
 ciated with stable air,  but this is not necessarily true during the
 daylight hours.   Thus any assumption that the contaminants are
 mainly confined in the  lower 500 feet is open to question and
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
122                          DAVIS

should be evaluated on the basis  of additional data.

      In spite of the limiting assumptions it seems worthwhile to
consider quantitatively the way in which  concentrations of pollu-
tants may be expected to build up in the air over Philadelphia
under certain circumstances.

      The physical layout of the  city is such that an area 10 miles
wide and 15  miles long along a southwest to northeast axis should
be representative of the  surface area to  be  ventilated.  If the  con-
taminants are  considered to be concentrated in a 500-foot depth,
the volume  of air to be ventilated is  14. 2 cubic miles.  The aver-
age  rate of generation of sulfur dioxide in Philadelphia is fairly
accurately known to be about 830 tons per day.  Since most of
this is  generated in the southern or southwestern to central sec-
tions of the  city, this seems to be a  suitable contaminant to work
with in quantitative calculations.

      Let us assume  that completely fresh air is flowing through
our space at a certain rate (the ventilation rate), that sulfur diox^
ide  is being generated in that space at a  fixed rate,  and that the
contaminant is instantaneously distributed throughout the air in
the  space.   Then, the rate at which the total volume of sulfur  di-
oxide in the space builds up with time can be expressed as


                      dV   Pdt -lAj.-^-  dt
                                       a

where    V   volume of sulfur dioxide in the air at any time
           P   rate  of production of sulfur dioxide
               830 tons per day - 2. 64 x  10"6 cubic miles per  hour
         ^r   ventilation rate  in cubic miles per hour
         V    total volume of  air   14. 2 cubic miles.
           a
                    V
          Note that— - concentration,  C.
                      a

      For a 10-mph wind speed, the ventilation rate is 9. 47 cubic
miles per hour, and

               dV  2.64xlO-6dt   9.41--dt
               2. 64 x 10"6-  V
                             1. 5
                                  dt
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5
                                                        GPO 8251II-!

-------
    AIR OVER PHILADELPHIA                            123


               1.5 In (2. 64 x 1(T6- ~)  t + constant
                           _
     Now,  at t  0, V   0.   . ' .  A = 2. 64 x 10~6, so


                            V               fi -t/1'5
              2.64 x 10-6  _J_  = 2.64 x 10~be
                           1. 5


     and      V   1.5  (2.  64 x 10~6)  (l-e~t/1-5)

To obtain the maximum V, note that  as t —• °°, e    '   -*  0,
io, V approaches 1. 5 (2. 64 x 1CT6) as a limit.  Therefore, after
i long period of time,

: ~ L 5 ^2' 64 x 10	* ^ 2. 8  x 10" 7 parts of SO2 per part  air
           L ^t, &

     or,      C   0.3  ppm.
     It is hardly likely that pollutants would be restricted to the
ower 500 feet of the atmosphere when the wind speeds average
[0 mph.   The expected concentrations would be one-half of the
:alculated value or less, if the vertical mixing extended through
t layer 1000 feet deep or more.

     In many of the periods considered earlier the wind speed
vas recorded as less than 4 mph on many observations. If we
:alculate  for a wind speed of 3 mph,  the ventilation rate becomes
i. 84 cubic miles per hour and the  maximum concentration is
L 0  ppm.

     The concentration buildup, of course, is quite rapid in the
;arly stages and then tends to level off, approaching the maximum
'or any given set of conditions.  For example,  if we use about
lalf of the maximum concentration for a wind speed of 3 mph; that
s,  0. 5 ppm, we find that it takes about 4 hours to attain that
ralue. A  graph showing the  rate at which  concentrations build up
'or a low  ventilation rate is plotted in Figure 3.  Note that this is
jased on the assumptions that the air coming into the  city is en-
irely clean and that the sulfur dioxide is restricted to the lower
iOO  feet of air.
     These derived concentrations are in good agreement with

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
124
                              DAVIS
observed concentrations of oxides of sulfur in the city.   The ob-
served concentrations averaged about 0. 15 ppm over the past 3
years,  with an estimated rise to 0. 5 to 1. 5 ppm if these oxides
varied  with the soiling index during the periods of minimum venti-
lation.
o
p
8
     1.0
     0.8
     0.6
     0.4
     0.2
                2        4        6        8        10       12

                               TIME, hours
         Figure 3.  S02 concentrations versus time for a wind speed of 3 mph.


EXPERIMENTAL FORECAST PERIOD
      At the suggestion of Mr.  Raymond  Smith,  Chief of the Air
Pollution Control Section, Department of Public Health,  of Phila-
delphia, a short  experimental program was  set up to predict high
pollution episodes for the city.   This  program embraced the per-
iod January 1 through April 30,  1961, but excluded the first 2
weeks in March.   During this program we were  to alert  the City
to the probability of high pollution levels  at  9 AM at least 24 hours
before the dates on which such  high pollution levels were expected
to occur.  We were to issue a definite high pollution level fore-
cast by 9 AM on the date of expected  occurrence and to give 24
hours notice of the expected time  of relief.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
THE AIR OVER PHILADELPHIA                             125

      Five air pollution "episodes'1 were recorded during the ex-
perimental program.  Four of these were successfully forecast.
For two episodes we were able to give 48 hours advance warning,
and for the other two,  24 hours.   On three  occasions we alerted
the city 24 hours in  advance but cancelled the alert by 9  AM on
the alert date.  On these  dates no high pollution levels were re-
corded.  Thus, periods of high pollution level in Philadelphia
were  successfully forecast at least 24 hours  in advance with 80
percent accuracy.

SUMMARY
      Simple air pollution theory indicates  that relatively few me-
teorological and air quality observations are necessary in general
air pollution studies.  Even these relatively few observations are
usually lacking, however, in studies of the behavior and quality
of the air over a particular city.   The observations of meteoro-
logical quantities related to air pollution should be standardized
and the number of observations increased.   Theory should be ex-
tended to include the complications brought about by characteris-
tics of urban areas.  At the same time, some useful rules for
forecasting and regulating air  pollution can be formulated for a
city such as Philadelphia on the basis of currently available ob-
servational data.
                        BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Boettger,  C. M. ,  1961:  Air pollution potential east of the
      Rocky Mountains:  Fall,  1959.  Bull. Amer. Meteor.  Soc. ,
      vol. 42, no. 9,  pp 615-620.                              "
    Davis,  F. K. ,  I960:  The Atmosphere Over Philadelphia.  Air
      Poll. Control Sec. , Dept. of Public Health,  City of Phila-
      delphia, 56 pp.
    DeMarrais,  G. A. ,  1961:  Vertical temperature difference ob-
      served over an  urban area.   Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. ,
      Vol.  42, No. 8,  pp 548-554.
    Dickson,  R. R. , 1961:  Meteorological factors affecting  par-
      ticulate  air pollution of a city.  Bull. Amer. Meteor.  Soc.
      Vol.  42, No. 8,  pp 556-560.
    Hemeon,  W. C. L. ,  1958:  What needs to be done in the future.
      Proc. Nat'l  Conf.  on Air Pollution,  U.S. Dept. of Health,
      Educ. and Welfare, pp 326-330.
    Keagy,  D. M. and Schueneman,  J.J., 1958: Air pollution in
      the Birmingham,  Alabama area.   Tech. Rep. A 58-8,  U.S.
      Dept. of Health, Educ. and Welfare,  17 pp.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
 126                         DAVIS

 7.  KLeinsasser,  T.W. and Wanta,  R. C. ,  1956: The development
       of a forecasting service  for use in air pollution control.
       Paper presented APCA meeting,  Buffalo, N. Y. , May, I95ji
 8.  Machta, L. ,  Scott, G. ,  and Korshover,  J. , 1958:  Weather
       Bureau Research on air pollution potential.  APCA Proc,,
       58-25,  19 pp.                                       ~'
 9.  Maneri, C. S. and Megonnell, W. H. ,  I960: Comprehensive
       area surveys inN.Y.  State.  Journ. APCA,  Vol.  10, No. 5
       pp 374-377.
10.  Markee,  E. H.  Jr.,  1961:  Effects of vertical temperature
       difference  on soiling index.  Journ.  APCA, Vol. 11, No. 3,
       pp 118-119.
11.  Neiburger, M. , 1959:  Meteorological aspects of oxidation
       type air  pollution.  The  Atm.  and the Sea in  Motion, Rocke-
       feller Inst.  Press, N. Y.
12.  Niemeyer,  L. E., I960: Forecasting air pollution potential.
       Mon.  Wea.  Rev. , Vol.  88, No.  3, pp  88-96.
13.  Sutton, O. G. ,  1932:  A theory of eddy  diffusion in the atmos-
       phere.  Proc.  Roy.  Soc. , London, A, Vol. 135, pp 143-165,
14.  Sutton, O. G. ,  1947:  The  problem of diffusion in the lower
       atmosphere.  Quart. Journ. Roy. Meteor. Soc. , Vol. 73,
       pp 426-436.
15.   Turner, D. B. , 1961:  Relationships between 24-hr,  mean air
       quality measurements and meteorological factors  in Nash-
       ville, Tennessee.  Journ. APCA, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp 483-
       489.
16.  Wanta, R. C. and Stern, A. C. ,  1957:   Classification of air
       pollution exposures.  Amer.  Ind. Hyg. Assoc.  Quarterly,
       Vol. 18,  No. 2, pp 156-160.
                           DISCUSSION

       MR. SCHUENEMAN:  I wonder if you have an estimate of
 the additional time it might take a regular weather bureau station
 operator to make pollution forecasts  once he has run through the
 exercises of developing and selecting parameters.   Assuming
 that he is making forecasts for other purposes, how much addi-
 tional work would it be?
       PROFESSOR DAVIS; As a rough estimate, I think it wouldn't
 take him any more than an extra 45 or 60 minutes to make a spec-
 ial air pollution forecast for a city like Philadelphia.
       DR. SCHMIDT:  I was very much interested in the last
..graph you showed giving the increase of air pollution as a func-
 tion of time.  I just tried to put it  in another way by taking the
 square root of time and I think that you found also that the increase
 is proportional.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
THE AIR OVER PHILADELPHIA                             127

      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  I made a note of that in the paper you
gave, and I am sure that is a pretty close approximation.

      DR. SCHMIDT:  I wonder if you could briefly tell us how
many stations you used in  gaining your pollutant levels for Phila-
delphia.  Did you find any  great variation statistically between
these stations?  And were these only particulates,  or did you also
include the gaseous material?

      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  We used only two stations in the
City of Philadelphia for the reason that over that 3-year period
only two  stations were making continuous observations.  The
measurements at other stations were sporadic,  and we wanted
observations on a continuing basis.  These were particulate
measurements made with the AISI and the high volume samplers.
      DR. SCHMIDT: Was there a great difference between these
two stations?  Did you reach a mean or an average, or just how
did you come to a particular level, a danger level of contaminants
in your city?

      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  We didn't establish a danger level.  As
a basis for classifying the pollution level as high,  we set a purely
arbitrary figure:  when a reading on an instrument was 1-1/2
times the monthly average.  We called this a critical value, but
one should not read into this any implication that this level is
dangerous to health.   I have no way of knowing whether this  is a
critical value in regard to health.
      The samplers at both stations were very consistent, I think,
in the over-all readings.

      MR. FULKS:  I would like to hear  something more  specific
about the type of wind exposure you would like.

      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  Well, as a physicist, about the best
thing you can  say  is that you would like to get all the data you can.
If we could stick an anemometer at every corner,  and 50 feet
above the surface, and all the  way up to  500 feet we would like  to
do this,  but it is not feasible.  At this point, I am not sure what
is required to really describe  the wind flow in a city like Phila-
delphia.

      FROM THE FLOOR:  Two related  values are the SO2 level
and the soiling index. When one exceeded  the limit,  did the other
exceed the limit?   And you talk about 1-1/2 times the monthly
average   - which month is that? If that occurs in the beginning
of the month,  how do you determine what the monthly average  is?
      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  With regard  to the second question,
the data  were furnished me by the City.  The Air Pollution Con-
trol Section of the City simply averaged  all the values from the

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
128                          DAVIS

beginning to the end of the month, and any individual reading
that turned out to be 1-1/2 times that average was considered to
be a high pollution level..

      Now, in regard to your question about the SO2 values and
the soiling index, these values also were given me by the Air
Pollution Control Section of the City of Philadelphia.   They are
confident of their SC>2 levels.  They  didn't have measurements on
a parallel basis,  but they assumed that the soiling index followed
the same pattern as the SO2-

      MR.  ROBINSON:  I am concerned about the  first statement
in your answer.   In air pollution studies, I think that one thing we
come across is a great deal of variability,  both in meteorological
and in air pollution measurements.   This makes your use of at
most two stations questionable.  I would  like to see you expand a
bit on this idea of simple relationships and few measurements.
      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  Well, I think during the early part of
the paper I cited  an equation such as those  derived by Sutton as
the basis for the  theory behind diffusion.   Now,  obviously simpli-
fying assumptions are made with regard  to the microscopic con-
dition of the atmosphere and so on,  but if you work with equations
such as Button's and others of similar nature it appears that wind
speed,  wind direction,  and air stability are all you need.

      MR.  ROBINSON:  This  is fine  in theory, but when you bring
these together with your measurements,  you don't come up with
a situation that makes you very satisfied with just a few observa-
tions.
      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  I thought that was the whole point of
my discussion:  the theory indicates that only a relatively few ob-
servations are needed,  but even these are lacking.
      DR. NEIBERGER:  I only want to comment that the theory
is based on very  simplified assumptions, which are not ordinar-
ily met in nature, and perhaps this  is the difference that you are
talking about.
      PROFESSOR DAVIS:  That's right.   That's the only theory
we  have,  I think.
      DR.  GIFFORD:  It is true that Button's method involves a
number of simplifying assumptions; but I think Sutton would be the
first person to point out,  were he here,  that he never intended
that the method that he presented should be applied to the distances
comparable with the size of a city, nor to deviations from the
smooth,  gently rolling land,  for which his method was first pre-
sented.   The fact that it has been applied in these  other ways in
no way reflects  upon the quality of his contribution, which was
great.
                                SEC  TECHNICAL  REPORT A62-5

-------
THE AIR OVER PHILADELPHIA                             129

      Very recently there has been a method used in connection
with the Atomic Energy applications.  That  sort of air pollution
is restricted at present to isolated or groups of isolated sources.
This method has been put forward by many of us,  particularly by
Mr.  Pasquill  in England.  It avoids the simplifying assumptions
by essentially relating the theoretical problem directly to the
high-grade measurements of atmospheric dispersion that have
been made by some  of the people  in this room and others in the
last few years.  This method is compatible  with the sort of treat-
ment that Button presented.  And  I don't want to present an unin-
vited paper at this point,  but I would like to say that I will have
available for distribution tomorrow, to any of those of you who are
interested,  a little pamphlet published by the Atomic Energy
Commission and my office, the Oak Ridge Weather Bureau Office,
which lists the essential technical information that is needed  in
order to use this method and gives something of the rationale.
This  pamphlet tells  you what observations the method is based on.

-------
                                  The Thermal Climate of Cities*

                                  J. MURRAY MITCHELL, Jr., Office of
                                  Climatology, U. S. Weather Bureau,
                                  Washington, D.C.
Summary
    The urban "heat island" and other aspects of the anomalous temperature distribu-
tion in cities are discussed. Evidence is presented of the long-term intensification of
the heat islands of several U. S. cities, associated with their physical growth. Con-
tributory causes of the heat island are outlined, including local heating plants (winter),
insolational superheating (summer), and the influence of aerosol and gaseous pollutants
on the urban radiation budget.  The influence of the heat island on other aspects of
urban climate, such as lapse rate, cloudiness, and turbulent mixing, is briefly con-
sidered.
THE URBAN "HEAT ISLAND"

      Many familiar urban-rural contrasts of weather and cli-
mate are due more  or less directly to the fact that cities are
warmer than their environs.  This characteristic warmth of a
city,  appropriately  dubbed the urban "heat island, " is particu-
larly noticeable at night when skies are clear and winds are
light.  Indeed the  "heat island" is so characteristic of urban cli-
mate that local Weather Bureau forecasts must usually account
for it with such familiar  wording as,  "clear tonight, low temper-
ature 40° in the city and  about 30° in the suburbs.  .  . "

      That certain cities are warmer than their environs has
been known for a very long time.  London's heat island was doc-
umented by Luke Howard   as long ago,  apparently,  as 1818.
More than a century later, Vienna's  was described in great de-
tail, among others by Wilhelm Schmidt,   who in 1927  was the
first to use an  automobile to obtain thermal cross-sections  of a
city.   Since then,  the temperature distributions of many cities
have been sampled.   The  example  of Washington, D. C. ,  has been
discussed by Landsberg.   Undoubtedly the most exhaustive study
of urban temperatures yet published  is that of Sundborg4'   for
Uppsala,  Sweden.
                                r>
      Duckworth and Sandberg   have recently surveyed the tem-
perature distribution of three  Californian communities by auto-
mobile.  Their study, the most comprehensive of its kind in the
United  States to date, demonstrated that relatively small towns
have heat islands  too. One survey, made  on a  clear spring night, is
*A revised version of this paper appeared in Weatherwise, vol. 14, no. 6, December 1961

                                131

-------
M
n

H
M
n
a
x
i— <
n
33
W

~
O
S3
                                                                                                                                                    HI     I-1
                                                                                                                                                    C     c/j
                                                                                                                                                    -a     to
                                                                                                                                                    •a
                                                                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                                                                    a>
                                                                                                                                                    a
                                                                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                                                                    13
                                                                                                                                                    ~

                                                                                                                                                    s
                                                                                                                                                    O
                                                                                                                                                    (W
                    Figure  1.  Isotherm pattern for 2320 PST on 4 April 1952 superimposed on an aerial photograph of San Francisco.
                                                                                                                                                    C/3
                                                                                                                                                    p
cn
o
O
cn
~
O
Tl
      n
      cc
      w
      r
      r

-------
THE THERMAL CLIMATE OF CITIES
133
Another survey by the same investigators is shown in Figure 2.
On these occasions, which were not particularly unusual,  the
temperature of the densely built-up business district was  some
20°F higher than the lowest observed suburban temperature, and
7 or 8 F higher than the average temperature of the urban per-
iphery.
                                                    .e
     ttothtrm pattern for
     PST, 26 March 1952, in
     San Francisco
                           Figure 2.
IS THE HEAT ISLAND REALLY MAN-MADE?

      Most cities were originally settled where they were be-
cause of desirable topographical features,  such as a river ad-
vantageous to commerce or hills tactically valuable in their
defense.  Such features are certain to produce microclimatic
anomalies.  Someone,  for example,  who knows both San Fran-
cisco and a smattering of microclimatology,  might well look at
Figure 1 and reasonably conclude that the same temperature pat-
tern would have existed on  the eve of the California gold rush in
1848, when San Francisco was a mere village of 800 inhabitants.
After all,  the highest temperatures are to be found on Nob Hill,
lying above the nocturnal inversion likely to spread over  the rest
of the city in clear calm weather,  and the lowest temperatures
are in Golden Gate Park, which at its minimal elevation would
be chilled  the most under this same  inversion.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
134
MITCHELL
      How,  then,  can we know that urban heat islands are not
topoclimatic anomalies that would exist,  city or no city?

      First, we can point to the fact that cities in entirely dif-
ferent topographic settings typically possess  heat islands. Ex-
amples of heat  islands in smaller cities, again measured by
Duckworth and  Sandberg,  are shown in Figures 3 and 4.
   Isotherm pattern for 2200
   PDT, 22 May 1952, in
   San Jose, California
                               Figure 3.
   Isotherm pattern for 2055
   PST, 25 March 1952, in
   Palo Alto, California
                              Figure 4.

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
THE THERMAL CLIMATE OF CITIES                      135

      Second, we can sometimes demonstrate that the heat island
of a city is weaker on Sundays,  when the city is comparatively
dormant, than on other days of the week,  when it is teeming with
people and bustling with activity. For example,  a comparison of
daily maximum and minimum temperatures in the city of New
Haven and at its neighboring airport, averaged for four winter
seasons,  is shown in Table 1.  The relative warmth is seen  to
have averaged only about half as much on Sunday as on any other
day.   (This result is statistically significant at the  99 percent
level.)
                         TABLE 1
EXCESS WARMTH OF CITY COMPARED WITH AIRPORT (F°)
            Data for New Haven,  Conn. , in Four
                 Winter Seasons 1939   1943

                  Maximum      Minimum      Mean daily
Day of week      temperature    temperature    temperature

Sunday                0.1             1.2             0.6
Monday               0.0             2.0             1.0
Tuesday               0.2             2.4             1.3
Wednesday            0.0             2.1             1.1
Thursday             0.0             2.3             1.2
Friday                0.0             2.4             1.1
Saturday              0.0             2.1             1.0
      Third,  it is frequently possible to show a gradual increase
 of the intensity of an urban heat island as the city grows in size
 and population over the years. ° Examples are Washington, D. C.
 and Baltimore, Md., whose seasonal mean temperatures as
 measured at their downtown Weather Bureau stations, are shown
 in Figure 5 in the form of 10-year moving averages from 1894 to
 1954,  For comparison, the combined temperature series for a
 large number of rural climatological stations,  all within about 50
 miles of these cities,  is also shown in this figure.   One can  see
 that, especially in the summer season,  the cities have been  grad-
 ually warming up in relation to their rural surroundings.   Cur-
 iously, this relative warming has been almost  entirely absent in
 winter (see bottom of Figure 5).
      The rates at which ten cities  in the  eastern half of the
 United States have warmed relative to their environs since the
 19th Century are compared for each season in  Table 2.  Here,
 the cities have been ranked in  order of growth  rate, measured
 by each city and its suburbs.  Such a measure of  city growth  has
 been used because it approximates  the average length of travel

 SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
136
                            MITCHELL
             1995-1904    1905-14    1915-24    1925-34
                               AVERAGING PERIOD
Figure 5. Ten-year moving averages of seasonal mean temperature in eastern Maryland,
        shown as departures from 1945-54 average. Solid curve is average of data (or
        17 rural  cooperative stations; dashed curve is Baltimore city data; dotted curve
        is Washington, D.  C.,  city data.

 over the city of air arriving at the Weather Station thermometer
 and the total  urban heating is  assumed to be proportional to this
 travel distance.  Table  2 shows that the highest rates of urban
 warming generally are  associated with the most  rapidly growing
 cities. The relationship is close in summer, as shown in Figure6,
 but not nearly so close  in winter or for the year  as a whole.  A
 different measure  of city growth would apparently be more appro-
 priate in the  colder half of the year, when the urban  heat island is
 maintained by different kinds  of heat sources than  those prevail-
 ing in  summer.   We  will have  a little more to say  about these
 presently.
                                 SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 THE THERMAL CLIMATE OF CITIES                          137

                              TABLE 2

     RATES OF URBAN WARMING OF  SELECTED  CITIES,
                            BY SEASONS

                   (Excess over Rural Environs)


(All values shown are significantly different from zero at 99 percent confidence level)



City

Cleveland, Ohio
Boston, Mass.
Washington, D. C.
Tampa, Fla,
Baltimore, Md.
Charlotte, N. C.
Rochester, N. Y.
Nashville, Tenn.
Lincoln, Nebr.
Marquette, Mich,


Period of
record a

1895-1941
1895-1933
1893-1954
1895-1931
1894-1954
1897-1951
1914-1940
1897-1948
1895-1954
1899-1954

Growth
rate
index

12. 9
10. 5
9. 9
6. 6
6.0
5. 1
4. 5
3. 0
2.4
0. 6
Urban warming rate (degrees F
per 100 yrs)


Winter
1. 8
2. 9
c
4. 8
c
c
c
c
c
c
Spring
3. 8
3. 2
1. 5
2. 6
2. 0
c
c
c
c
c
Summer
5. 1
4. 7
4. 3
2. 9
3.0
1. 7
c
c
2. 2
c
Autumn
2. 7
3. 7
2. 7
3.4
2. 7
c
c
c
c
c
a Limited to period of available city-office data only.
b Rate of change of root population (units per year).
c Not significantly different from zero.
       6 r
                  A. YEAR
  o   4
  o
  X
  O
  5

  I
                            r = .59
   B.  SUMMER
                                                           A
                                                          A
 A

A
           r  =  .86
                          10       15    0        5
                        CITY GROWTH  RATE
         10
15
 rigurc 6.  Change of urban temperature with city growth: annual mean temperature on left,
         ana summer-season mean on right.  Cities are those listed in Table 2. "r" is
         correlation coefficient.
 SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
138
                          MITCHELL
      In an earlier study along similar lines,  I compared the
net temperature changes between the 20-year periods 1900
through 1919 and 1920 through 1939, at a total of 77 cities through-
out the United States, with the corresponding changes of square
root of urban population.  Regression lines were fitted to these
data in each of six geographical  sections of the country.  For the
annual mean temperature, the results are reproduced in Figure 7.
In all  six zones the regression lines have a similar slope, an in-
dication that the more rapidly growing cities in each  zone tended
to experience faster rates of warming than the slower-growing
cities. This result is quantitatively as well as qualitatively con-
sistent with the more direct measure of the effect of  urban growth
in 10 cities shown in Figure 6.
               MEAN  TEMPERATURE  CHANGE (DEC. F)
Ld
2  or
              I
                                                     +3
                   20120
                 <« 12-MONTH ANNUAL AVERAGE
Figure 7.  20-yr changes  of annual mean temperature at 77 selected cities in the United
        States, as (unction of 20-yr changes in square root of their urban population, by
        geographical zones. Computed regression lines are included.  Data cover
        period 1900 -  1939.
 CITY-RURAL TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES IN RELATION
 TO TIME OF DAY

       It has already been mentioned that the urban heat island is
 most evident at night.  Figure 8 shows comparative monthly av-
 erage temperature in the center and at the edge of a city for each
 hour  of the day.  The figure refers to Vienna, Austria,  for which
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
THE THERMAL CLIMATE OF CITIES
139
hourly mean temperatures are readily available,   but there is
no reason to doubt that data for American cities would show sim-
ilar comparisons.
                    JULY, 1956
                                — SCHOTTENSTIFT
                                    (URBAN STATIONI
                                --- HOME WARTE
                                    {SUBURBAN STATION)
                   FEBRUARY, 1956
                  12  2  4  6  8  10 12  2  4  6  8  10 12
                        A.M.      NOON       RM.
         Figure 8.  Diurnal variation of temperature in Vienna, Austria.


      In July the relative warmth of the city is greatest at night,
and virtually absent during most of the daytime.  In fact,  during
mid-day in summer, it is not unusual for the city to be a fraction
of a degree cooler than its environs,  owing presumably to the at-
tentuation of sunlight over the city by dust and  smoke.  The city
continues to hold its heat in the late afternoon, after tempera-
tures have begun to slide in the suburbs.  Maximum  daily temper-
atures in the city may thus be reached  an hour or two after they
are reached in the suburbs. Minimum temperatures are also
reached somewhat later in the  city,  and the daily temperature
range is smaller.

      In February (the coolest  month of the year  in Vienna) the
city tends to  remain warmer than its suburbs both day and night.
Again, the daytime differences are smaller than  the nighttime
ones.  Daily maxima and minima of temperature are reached
slightly later in the city than in the suburbs,  and the daily range
is less in the city.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
140
                          MITCHELL
CITY-RURAL TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES IN RELATION
TO TIME OF YEAR

      Figure 9 shows two examples of the annual march of tem-
perature in and outside cities.  Comparative monthly normals of
daily maximum, mean, and minimum temperature are included
in this figure. These examples are typical in showing the urban
heat island to be reflected most in minimum temperatures, and
least in maximum temperatures,  throughout the year.
                90

                so

                70

                60

                50

                40

                30
              u  90
              K
                60

                70

                60

                50

                40

                30

                20

                10
DENVER, COLO.
                                    CITY STATION
                                    AIRPORT STATION
BALTIMORE, MD.
                                        A S  0 N
 Figure 9. Annual variation of average monthly maximum, mean, and minimum temperatures
        in and outside selected cities.

 CONTRIBUTORY CAUSES OF THE HEAT ISLAND

       Various physical factors are  probably responsible in part
 for the formation of urban heat islands.  Some are more  influen-
 tial in summer,  and  others more so in winter.

       On a summer day solar radiation is more  or less readily
 absorbed in the city by building and paving materials possessing
 large heat-storage capacities.  There is virtually no vegetation
 or moist soil that can soak up some of this  solar heat by evapor-
 ation, as it does in the country.  The temperature of streets and
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5.

-------
THE THERMAL CLIMATE OF CITIES                      141

south-exposed building surfaces may soar well above 100°. Even
though air temperatures may be reasonably low,  these hot sur-
faces irradiate us poor  pedestrians,  seemingly like so many
turkeys in a slow oven!  To make matters worse,  the buildings
obstruct ambient wind that might otherwise  offer  relief.

      As night falls, the streets and buildings begin to cool down,
but very slowly. Their radiation continues all night, and their el-
evated temperatures prevent the air itself from cooling as much
as it otherwise would. By morning this heat has still not entirely
expended itself,  and the next sizzling day begins with this therm-
al handicap.
      On a winter day matters  are  a bit different  - at least in our
relatively high latitudes. The solar rays may have  appreciable
heat in them, but the streets and buildings are warmed  perhaps
as much by the furnace  heat of our office buildings  and homes.
This heat seeps through their imperfectly insulated walls and
windows and disgorges through countless rooftop  chimneys.

      During the day the atmosphere is comparatively turbulent,
and the urban warmth is dissipated before street-level temper-
atures can be much affected.  By nightfall,  however,  the-furnaces
begin to work harder against the cold, and the increasing slug-
gishness and stability of the atmosphere allow their heat to ac-
cumulate more readily in the city.  In addition, the  smoke, water
vapor, and  carbon dioxide escaping from the chimneys spread
out in a "blanket" above roof-level that supplements the building
walls themselves in intercepting some of the heat radiation from
the streets  and re-radiating part of their own heat downward.
Under these circumstances temperatures remain relatively high
in the city throughout the night, all the way from  street level  to
heights  often considerably above the roof tops.

      Surmounting this warm layer, a nocturnal inversion is com-
monly encountered. This inversion inhibits the upward dispersion
of smoke and other pollutants in the city.  In fact, the inversion
may become intensified  by the  pollution layer whose upper surface
cools by radiation to the sky, just as in the country the ground it-
self cools by radiation.  This,  in turn, promotes the further in-
crease of pollution concentration in the city,  until arrival of
morning, when the sun's heat can finally destroy the inversion.

EFFECT OF WEATHER ON THE HEAT ISLAND

     In the preceding discussion,  we  have been presupposing
average weather conditions, characterized by relatively clear
skies and light winds. Since cloudiness and  strong winds would
inhibit the formation of ground inversions,  and since wind speed
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
142                      MITCHELL

would also affect the rate of "ventilation" of the city, it is to be
expected that the intensity of the urban heat island would depend
substantially on these  weather variables.  Sundborg,4 who studied
the matter in some detail for Uppsala, found that the nighttime
urban-rural temperature difference, D,  could be roughly approx-
imated by an equation of the form
                       D=
                              V
where N is percent cloud cover, V is wind speed, and a and-b are
constants. Undoubtedly such a formula could be used for cities
other than Uppsala;  appropriate values of the constants would de-
pend on the city and on the locations of the wind speed and com-
parative temperature measurements. *

      In this discussion it has been possible merely to sketch in
some of the salient characteristics of the urban heat island. Much
remains to be done in establishing the relative importance of the
various physical factors involved. Of particular  interest to us
here,  of course, is the role of atmospheric pollution — water
vapor and carbon dioxide as well as smoke— in altering the ra-
diative heat balance of cities.  Unfortunately very few theoretical
studies of this subject have been made.  We hope that this matter
will receive much more attention in the near future.
 *  Note that calm winds would have to be treated as a special case
 case (in Uppsala, calms were rare). Sundborg also found that
 temperature and humidity influence D somewhat. At night, how-
 ever,  these factors are negligible in comparison with wind and
 cloudiness.
                       REFERENCES

    Howard, L. :  Climate of London Deduced from Meteorologic-
      al Observations.  Harvey and Darton,  London (3rd Ed), 1833.
    Schmidt, W. :  Distribution of Minimum Temperature during
      the Frost Night of May 12, 1927 within Vienna.  Fortschritte
      der Landwirtschaft, 2-21, 1929,681-686. (In German. )
    Landsberg, H. E. :  Comfortable Living Depends on Micro-
      climate.  Weatherwise,  3-1, 1950, 7-10.
    Sundborg,  A. :  Climatological studies  of the Special Regard
      to the Temperature  Conditions in the Urban Area.  Geo-
      graphica (Geographical Institute,  University of Uppsala,)
      22, 1951. (Ill pages.)
    Sundborg,  A. :  Local Climatological Studies of Area.  Tellus,
      2-3,  1959, 222-232.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
THE THERMAL CLIMATE OF CITIES                      143

6.  Duckworth, F. S.,  and J. S.  Sandberg.  The Effect of Cities
     upon Horizontal and Vertical Temperature Gradients.
     Bulletin American Meteorological Society,  35-5,  1954,
     198-207.
7.  Mitchell, J.  M. , Jr.:  On the Causes  of Instrumentally Ob-
     served Secular Temperature Trends.  Journal of Meteor-
     ology,  10-4,  1953, 244-261.
8.  Mitchell, J.  M., Jr. :  The Measurement of Secular Temper-
     ature Change in the Eastern United States.  Research Paper
     No.  43, U. S. Weather Bureau, Washington,  1961.
     (80 pages.)
9.  Steinhauser, F. , O.  Eckel,  and F. Sauberer.   The Climate
     and  Bioclimate of Vienna (Part II).  Osterreich Gesellschaft
     fur Meteorologie, Vienna,  1957.  (136 pages,  in German.)


                        DISCUSSION

     MR.  MILLER:  I have two points.  One is the possibility
that Washington, D. C. is different from other cities as to the
limitation on vertical construction. I am not talking about the
growth of  the government,  but the buildings.

     Second, I would like  to have Dr. Mitchell comment on
what geographers are calling "strip cities, " such as the urban
complex between Cleveland and Pittsburgh, or between Washing-
ton and  New York.
     DR.  MITCHELL: Well, the government in Washington is
certainly growing,  but mostly it is growing in the suburbs.  As
a matter of fact,  looking at the horizon from  24th and M Streets,
where the long series of observations cited here were made, I
am impressed by the fact that it doesn't differ very much from
what it looked like in photographs 20, 30, or 40 years ago.  I
think that  in winter, at least, the  intensity of the heat island,
from the point of view  of a single  spot in the city, is importantly
affected by what is  happening right in the local area, not so much
by what is happening at the distance of the suburbs.

     Another way of saying the same thing is that in winter, at
least, the heat island will grow in area with the growth of a city,
but will not intensify much in terms of its  central superheating
value.   But in summer apparently other things are  involved --
what is  going on in  the suburbs does affect temperatures down-
wind in  other parts of the city.

     Now, concerning these "strip cities, " I don't really know
what can be said about them. Apparently,  even a  moderately
small amount of human development is enough to  affect


SYMPOSIUM: AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
 144                      MITCHELL

 temperatures, and especially in winter it doesn't take very much
 development to affect temperatures quite noticeably.   From that
 point on, further physical development will have a relatively
 small effect on temperature.  So I think that if I were to predict
 how temperature conditions in strip cities and other newer  rural
 developments would change,  I would expect to find initially  a
 rather rapid increase of nocturnal temperatures in these areas,
 Then, as these communities continue to grow,  in a peripheral
 sense, the  effect will probably become less pronounced.
       MR.  ROBINSON:  I think somebody should speak from
 Palo Alto.
       I noticed something on the slides that I hadn't noticed  be-
 fore,  and perhaps it is  significant.  The temperature differences
 from San Francisco to Palo Alto were not great in the sense of
 the built-up part of the  city,  each case being in order of 10  de-
 grees.  But the  area covered by this high-temperature isotherm
 was primarily,  if my memory serves me rightly,  the area  in
 which we have reinforced concrete buildings.  In Palo Alto, this
 is  an area  of a few square blocks;  in San Francisco it is possibly
 about a  square mile,  or maybe 2 square miles.  The area for
 San Jose would be in between. But if this is a factor, perhaps,
 in  the growth of cities,  the development of the downtown area
 and the  growth of reinforced concrete construction is a signifi-
 cant factor, and then,  perhaps, the central portions of the city
 have seen the  maximum as far as this is concerned.  I noticed,
 that for Palo Alto there was a slight indication of an isotherm
 even around the building complex  of Stanford University.  This,
 again, is a stone and  concrete group of buildings in an isolated,
 really a rural setting.  This might also be a factor of difference
 to  look for  if careful observation should come about between an
 eastern city with brick  construction in the homes and residential
 areas, compared to a western city with wood and stucco, that
 retains  much less heat.

	 OR. GIFFORD:  One of the graphs you presented showed
 the graduaTlnc-p-ease of the winter temperature in Washington.
 I recall  that in the climatology that I took some time  ago, we
 considered an over-all temperature increase for the  whole  world.
 I wonder if you could  comment oh the effect  of this city heat is-
 land phenomenon on the possibilities of detecting an over-all
 worldwide temperature or of  defining an overall worldwide
 temperature?   Since this increase is apparently an urbanization
 effect, could we now know actually what the  global temperature
 is  doing?

      DR. MITCHELL:  I think so.  You may remember that I


                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT  A62-5

-------
THE THERMAL CLIMATE OF CITIES                      145

showed a series of six regressions of the temperature trend
versus the population growth of the cities. (Figure 7)   The
point at which these regression lines intersect the zero line
of city growth was not at zero temperature change.  This is
one indication that there is a residual trend that is certainly
due to large-scale climatic variations.   Taking records from
various nonurbanized locations we come to the same conclusion,
that definite temperature trends exist over and above what the
cities are contributing. The two effects are very real, and for
many purposes  it is essential to separate the two; that's what I
tried to do here.
     DR. GIFFORD:  Are these trends of about the same mag-
nitude?
     DR. MITCHELL: That depends on what time interval you
consider. They have been about equal since the turn of the cen-
tury,  yes.  This was  only a  coincidence.

      Mr. STOUT: Mr. Changnon has some  data on thermograph
records from the four stations around Champaign-Urbana, a
small city with  a population  of 7, 000.  The interesting thing is
that we do have the cooling off at  night,  which you would expect
at the rural  stations.  But in the afternoon these- stations are
warmer than the downtown stations.  So  there is sort of a ring,
or a donut effect taking place, in the  afternoon,  anyway, that I
have no explanation for.

     DR. HILST: Has any attempt been made to use these data
to determine the thermal energy excess in the heat island and
compare  this with the energy consumption in the city?

     DR. .MITCHELL: You mean to  make direct calculations of
the  amount of warming to  be expected from  local fuel consump-
tion?  Did I  understand you correctly?

     DR. HILST: Just what do these numbers represent in the
way of excess thermal energy in the atmosphere?

     DR. MITCHELL: They are  quite consistent with estimates
of the heat produced by fuel  combustion in the winter seasons. I
can cite a few studies, but they put a highlight only on this matter
of fuel consumption and not other heat-budget factors involved.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                 Some Observations of Cloud Initiation in
                                 Industrial Areas

                                 GLENN E. STOUT, Head, Meteorology
                                 Section, Illinois State Water Survey,
                                 Urbana, Illinois
Summary
    A petro-chemical industry, located in the rural areas of central Illinois, has been
observed to initiate clouds. At least five cases are partially documented by surface,
airborne, or radar observations. On one occasion a cumulus congestus cloud formed and
produced tornado funnels.  No  other clouds were present in the area. Other cases are
discussed and the available data presented. Preliminary occasional observations suggest
that this industrial source could be used for an interesting research study of the possible
influence of industrial pollution on cloud formations.
      Various investigators have suggested that pollution from in-
dustrial sources enhances precipitation.   To the best of my knowl-
edge, no one has proposed that pollution  decreases rainfall  down-
wind from the source.  For example,  Landsberg and Changnon,
in earlier papers of this symposium, have suggested that precip-
itation over an urban  area is  greater than over the rural areas.
To test a hypothesis that  nuclei from specific industrial sources
might increase  precipitation in the atmosphere, the staff at Gen-
eral Electric Company, Falconer and Schaefer, •"•   studied rainfall
patterns downwind from lead-smelting plants in the West.   Re-
sults were inconclusive,  since the lack of sufficient rain gages in
the area prevented a  comprehensive study.

      More  recently,  F. W. Van  Straten,2  of the  U.S. Navy,
proposed that carbon  black would produce clouds under certain
conditions and would  enhance the development of clouds.  Tests
were made by spreading carbon black in  warm maritime air. Al-
though there was some suggestion that clouds  could be produced,
the program has not been fully tested.

      Telford, ^ of the Commonwealth  Scientific and Industrial
Research Organization in Australia,  recently  concluded that a
portion of the freezing nuclei in the atmosphere comes from cer-
tain types of industrial activity.   The  smoke from a steel factory
was identified as a prolific .source.  He also concluded that other
industries probably have  little influence  on the freezing nuclei
count.  It is  quite possible that some may produce inhibiting agents.

      Studies of rainfall in Illinois by Huff4 have  suggested that
the greatest  frequency of heavy  rainfalls occurred east  of St.
Louis, Missouri.  The annual mean rainfall at Edwardsville,

                                147

-------
 148
STOUT
Illinois, has increased by 10 percent in the last two decades.  A
detailed climatological study has shown a higher incidence of
fronts in this region.  Therefore, the increase may be due to pol-
lution or frontal stagnation.
      The rainfall patterns east of Chicago have been of consider-
able interest to us.  For example, LaPorte, Indiana,  shows an
average annual rainfall of 50 inches, while nearby stations re-
port 36 inches.  Correspondence with the State Climatologist of
Indiana has  not produced a satisfactory explanation of  this great
rainfall anomaly.
      The large concentration of steel mills around Gary could
very well support the  high incidence of rainfall at the LaPorte
station.  Figure 1 shows the annual precipitation for LaPorte,
          LA PORTE
     	VALPARAISO
     	 SOUTH BEND
          WHITING
     1900  1905  1910   1915   1920  1925   1930  1935  1940  1945  1950  1955  I960
                                 —YEARS —

 Figure 1. Annual precipitation values determined by averaging 5-year moving totals for
         selected Indiana stations

Valparaiso,  South Bend,  and Whiting,  Indiana.  The increase in
precipitation beginning about 1922 is quite evident at the three
stations in operation at that  time.   The  continuing increase in the


                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CLOUD INITIATION IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS
149
annual precipitation at LaPorte is  quite striking.  Either the ex-
posure of the gage or the pollution from the steel mills has con-
tributed to the anomaly.   The LaPorte observer convinced the
author that there is an unusual wintertime snowfall belt in a small
area around LaPorte.  The heavy snowfall arrives with north-
westerly flow, which may be due to lake effect.  The pronounced
increase in rainfall in summer is difficult to explain.   Figure 2
shows the annual steel production in the Chicago and Gary indus-
trial complex.  The great increase in annual rainfall after 1933
  100 xlO7
  I00xl0s
  100x10*
 I
 in
 Ł100x10*
 H
 Ł 100X10'
 I
  lOOxlO2
        1910  1915   1920  1925  1930   1935  1940  1945  1950  1955  I960
                              - YEARS-

             Figure 2. Annual steel production in tons, 1910-1960
 coincides with the greater increase in steel production.  Exact
 figures for the Gary steel manufacturing complex were not avail-
 able.  We have also looked at the rainfall patterns downwind from
 other industrial areas such as Peoria, Illinois, and find no anom-
 alies of any significance.  There are no steel furnaces in the
 Peoria area.

      Johnson  reported that a cumulus cloud developed over a
 prairie grass fire.  The radiosonde data did not indicate any con-
 vective activity possible.  He thought that the water vapor for the
 cloud over the fire came from evaporation of the moisture from
 the green grass, from the'top layers of the ground, and  also from
 the combustion of the grass.  Hoddinott ^  reported observing a
 funnel cloud that was due to an industrial  activity.  He reported
 that the area of Chester, England,  has been a beehive of indus-
 trial activity since 1955 and that new cumulonimbus developments
 were often observed downwind from the steel works of Chester.
 SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
150                         STOUT

      The flat prairie land of east central Illinois was trans-
formed from an agricultural area by the construction of a large
industrial activity just west of Tuscola, Illinois, in about 1951.
The  industrial complex is now valued at $130 million and covers
approximately a  square mile.  Five hundred thousand cubic feet
of natural gas is used daily in the extraction of various elements
including ethane, which is the main raw material used in making
petrochemical products.   The plant also houses the largest unit
in the world for making industrial alcohol.

      On December 24, 1954,  the Midwest area was under a large,
high-pressure system of continental origin.  At around 1600,  I
observed from our laboratory a  low stratus-type cloud,  the only
cloud in the sky, directly south of the airport.  There was also
one  small cumulus turret evident.  I drove 20 miles south to the
source  of the  cloud and observed that the stratus was actually a
dark smoke cloud below an inversion of 1700 feet.   The white
cumulus turret was located near the power plant stacks and ex-
tended  several hundred feet above the inversion.  Fallout was oc-
curring about three miles from the stack.  Upon investigation of
possible contaminations in the air,  I learned unofficially  that there
had  been a burnoff of  alcohol  prior to my first cloud observations.

      On March  1,  1960, clouds of unusual origin were again ob-
served  near Tuscola and at Decatur, approximately 30 miles due
west.  A pilot  reported that these clouds were the only ones pres-
ent.   Clouds formed near the top of the inversion layer and were
approximately 200  feet in depth.  Below the base of the clouds,
industrial smoke was  clearly visible and seemed to be feeding into
the cloud formation.

      In May 1960, Dr. B. Vonnegut from Arthur D. Little, Inc.,
and  I observed a low-hanging white cloud in the  area of the indus-
trial activity in the late evening.  A squall line had passed the
area in the late "afternoon.  The  industrial cloud extended  15 to 20
miles from the source and was intense  enough for radar detection.
The  top of the cloud as determined  by radar was about 6000 feet.
No rainfall measurements are available to verify a precipitation
mechanism within the storm.

      Our most striking observation occurred on May 27,  1960.
As we drove to work at 0700 CST, we observed one large cumulus
cloud about  20  miles south of the airport.   There were no other
clouds present within  visible range. We immediately dispatched
an aircraft, which at that time was outfitted to collect samples of
the particulates in the atmosphere,  to investigate.   As the ob-
server  approached the area, he called back to report a funnel
hanging from the base of the cloud.  In the  meantime,  radar ob-
servations  indicated the cloud top was 20, 000 feet.   A few minutes

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CLOUD INITIATION IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS                  151

later, the state police  called to report funnels from this isolated
cloud.  They observed five funnels during the 75-minute period
of observation.  The particle concentration within the cloud was
of sufficient quantity and size that again the radar was able to
detect it.  To the best  of our knowledge there was no precipita-
tion from the cloud.  This observation appears to be similar to
Hoddinott's in Chester, England.

     On October 12,  1961,  clear skies prevailed over East
Central Illinois except for intense smoke layers over the cities
and the Petro Chemical Company area, where inversion around
2500 feet produced a dense smoke layer extending westward from
Tuscola.   At the same time,  a  lower inversion with a top at 100
feet trapped a white hygroscopic smoke, which appeared to be a
fog layer.  This layer  extended northeastward from the Tuscola
area for  approximately 20 miles.

     Two types of data should  be explored for further study of
this phenomenon.  First, a radar climatological study of the ex-
istence of echoes in and downwind of industrial areas should be
undertaken. Secondly,  the use of TIROS cloud data would help to
support some of these  findings.

     Wilk 7 of the Illinois State Water Survey has been using well-
calibrated quantitized radar information to determine the areas  of
greatest  radar reflectivity during hailstorms.  During several of
his case  studies, he has noticed that the strongest echoes from
precipitation masses occur over industrial areas.  On other occa-
sions he  has observed  new echo developments ahead of squall
lines downwind of industrial areas such as St.  Louis, Missouri.
No quantitative comprehensive  study has been undertaken to date,
but the significance of  the data  suggests that such work should be
performed.

     Satellite information also provides a new source of data.
Inspection of TIROS photos has on several occasions shown in-
creased cloud activity  just east of Gary, Indiana.   Maps of rain-
fall showed localized rainfall in the  area during the approximate
time ot the satellite passage.   Therefore,  a climatological study
of aerial cloud photos in and around major industrial areas with
and without other influences, such as large bodies of water,  would
prove most interesting.
     I have tried to illustrate  that industrial complexes produce
clouds  and enhance precipitation.  Conversely,  there is always  a
chance that pollution will have  no effect on the precipitation proc-
ess.  Several techniques have been  suggested for future data col-
lection and research on the  influence of industrial activities on
precipitation.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
152                         STOUT

                        REFERENCES

1.   Falconer,  R. E.  andV.J. Schaefer, Final Report No. RL-
      1007,  ONR Project,  Contract No. NONR-925(00), Decem-
      ber,  1953.
2.   Van Straten, F. W. ,  "Preliminary Experiments using Carbon
      Black for Cloud Modification and Formation, " NRL Report
      5235,  October 28,  1958.
3.   Telford, J. W. ,  "Freezing Nuclei from Industrial Processes,"
      Journal  of Meteorology, Vol.  17,  No. 6,  December 1960,
      676-679.
4.   Stout, G.E.  and F. A. Huff, "Studies of Hydrometeorological
      Factors Influencing Severe Rainstorms on Small Water-
      sheds. "  Presented at Tenth Hydraulics Division Conference
      of ASCE in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, August 16-18, 1961.
5.   Johnson, Oliver, "The Development of a Cumulus Cloud over
      a Prairie Grass Fire. "  Weather,  London, 14(6), June
      1959,  212-215.
6.   Hoddinott, M.H.O. ,  "Funnel Cloud at Chester,  July 28, 1959."
      Meteorological Magazine, London, 89(1053),  April 1960,
      124-125.
7.   Wilk, Kenneth E. , "Radar Investigations  of Illinois Hail-
      storms. "  Scientific Report No.  1, Contract No. AF 19(604)-
      4940,  January 15,  1961.
                          DISCUSSION

      DR.  NEIBERGER:  Just one or two comments about some
experiments that Dr. Dessens in France has been conducting on
the French side of the Pyrenees.  He has been conducting what he
calls a meteorotone, which consists of a square of oil burners
about 100 meters  square.  I have forgotten the amount of oil that
is consumed and the corresponding  amount of energy produced,
but in his experiments under appropriate conditions the smoke
column,  or the column of heat,  develops convective activity to the
extent that cumulus  clouds are formed.   In two or three cases he
has had funneled clouds developed which had quite intense rota-
tions,  corresponding to small tornados.
      MR.  KALSTROM: May I ask  in what direction these funnel
clouds were in relation to  the plant  and the heat  sources -- how
far downwind? Or were they quite close to the energy?
      MR.  STOUT:  They were downwind and about 5 miles away.
But the cloud  kept moving  away,  so that at the end of an hour the
cloud was about 25 miles from the source.   It was a slow-moving
cloud, but  it did migrate away from the  source.

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
CLOUD INITIATION IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS                 153

     MR. KALSTROM:  The funnels occurred some distance
away from the heat ?

     MR. STOUT:  Yes, that's right.

     FROM THE FLOOR:  I might mention a rather well-docu-
mented case, I believe in the 1920's.  An oil fire was reported,
where tornados actually occurred.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES
                                                   GPO 825111—6

-------
Session 2:  The Dispersion and Deposition of Air Potiutants Over Cities
M. NEIBERGER,* Chairman
Summary

   In setting limits for the control of pollution sources in industrial and urban com-
plexes, limits must not be established solely on the basis of individual stacks and
plants; the basic concept must be the area-source strength, in terms of total emissions
per square mile, since the emissions from separate stacks and plants are additive as the
air moves across them toward residential and commercial communities.  The dispersion of
pollutants from vehicle exhausts along congested streets and roads deserves attention.
Such questions as the influence of heat from motors and the motion of the vehicles need
examination.  Studies of dispersion have generally assumed flat uniform terrain and wind
conditions in which the direction is steady and the average speed is high compared to
turbulent fluctuations.  Studies must be performed on the dispersion of pollutants over an
irregular complex of buildings and under the influence of wind conditions in which the
average speed is low and the magnitude of windspeeds in fluctuations is as great or
greater.
      In introducing this session on the dispersion and deposition
 of atmospheric pollution over cities,  I want to point out the ques-
 tions I regard as most important in the consideration of the dis-
 persion of air pollution over cities.   For the  most part I shall
 leave the answers to the other members of the  panel insofar as
 answers are  known,  and to further research insofar as they are
 not.  It is my hope that in the course of this  morning's session
 the foundation for this afternoon's  program on present and future
 needs for observational data will be laid.   At the same time,  the
 needs for future theoretical studies will be developed.
      In the past almost all studies of the dispersion of pollution
 have dealt with point sources,  and line sources have been con-
 sidered occasionally.  The problem of area sources,  and partic-
 ularly the effective evaluation of how the concentrations due to
 self- contamination within large source areas depend on the var-
 ious contributing factors,  has begun to be  investigated only
 recently.

      We can get a simple indication  of this dependence by mak-
 ing the assumption, as is frequently done, that the flux,  F, of a
 contaminant of concentration C  in any direction is proportional
 to its gradient in that direction.
      Here Fz is the flux in the vertical of a contaminant of con-
centration C, and Az is the  coefficient of  proportionality,  ordi-
narily called the coefficient of turbulent exchange, or sometimes
the eddy diffusivity.

'Chairman, Dept. of Meteorohogy, University of California at Los Angeles

                                155

-------
 156                       NEIBERGER

      Fx and Fy are similar expressions for the flux and in x and
y directions.
      As is familiar to all of you,  consideration of the conver-
gence of this flux leads to the expression for the rate of change of
the concentration with time given in equation 2.

      —     — ( Ax 	 ) +	f Ay — ) + -— I Az T— ) (2)
       at     a x V    a * /   dy \    dy J   dz  \   dz /

      For an individual point source, integration of this equation
leads under simplifying assumptions to the formulas of Roberts,
Bosanquet and Pearson, and Button.

      In a general way their formulas show the concentration at
the ground downwind of a large elevated source in  the form shown
in Figure  1.  The position of the large elevated source is taken at
the origin of the coordinate axis; the maximum ground concentra-
tion is some  distance downwind because of the time that is re-
quired for the diffusion to carry the pollutant down to the ground,
and the further diffusion spreads it out  so that beyond this point
along the plume axis you have a more or less exponential decrease.
                    1000       1500       2000      2500      3000      3500

                    DISTANCE DOWNWIND ALONG PLUME AXIS, meters

   Figure 1. Variation with distance of surface concentrations from elevated source
          (schematic).


      Now,  if you had initially a background of pollution on which '
the contamination due to this source is superimposed,  you would


                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION AND DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS
157
have the situation shown in Figure  2.  Here the background con-
centration is shown by the dashed line and the total concentration
is shown by the same curve as in Figure  1  displaced upward. Far
enough downwind of the point source,  the effect is simply to in-
crease the  background concentration slightly.
                          TOTAL CONCENTRATION
                                        BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION
            1            23456

                          DISTANCE DOWNWIND, kilometer,

  Figure 2. Variation with distance of total concentrations at surface downwind from an
         elevated source (schematic).
                           DISTANCE DOWNWIND, kllomitni
 Figure 3. Variation with distance of total concentrations at surface downwind from a
         number of elevated sources located along a line parallel to the m»on wind
         (schematic).
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
 158                      NEIBERGER

      Now, if you visualize a series of such point sources all in
a line along the wind you would get the conditions shown in
Figure  3.   The first source adds to the background concentration
its typical hump, which falls  off and leaves the background slight-
ly higher,  and then the next one does the same thing.   Thus there
is a gradual increase in the background.
      In Figure 3 I  have assumed schematically that all of the
sources are very large,  each producing a big hump and then de-
clining in the course of over a kilometer, and that all of them are
located exactly along the wind direction.  This, of course, in gen-
eral would not be true. If you had random sized and randomly
spaced sources spread over an area, the effects along the axis
would look like that shown in Figure 4. In this case one after
another of the sources would contribute at  random intervals and
with random intensities.  The background concentration goes up
as a result of the successive decay of each  of these sources. The
plume axis of the first one source is assumed to be the line along
which the  concentration is computed.  Occasionally, this line will
strike a source which is approximately on the  same plume axis,
but in general the sources will be some distance from  it.
                         DISTANCE DOWNWIND, kllom.f.r.
  Figure 4.  Variation with distance of surface concentrations from randomly sized and
          spaced elevated sources (schematic).


      To  get a quantitative estimate of the increase in background
concentration due to an area source of this sort, we must express
the intensity of the source in terms of a smooth functionE(x, y, t),
The boundary conditions for the solution of the equation then would

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION AND DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS            159

be that at the ground, i. e. ,  at z =  0, Fz ,  the upward flux, is just
equal to the  source function.  (For the moment we assume that
the sources  are all at the ground. )  We further assume that at
sufficiently great heights the concentration goes to zero,  and at
the point where the air first begins to cross the source area the
concentration is zero.  These boundary conditions,
                    Fz = E ( x,  y,  t) at z   0
                     C = 0  at z = -°                     (3)
                     C = 0  at x = 0 .

are adequate to determine a solution if AX, Ay,  and Az are known.

     In general,  Ax, Ay, AZ are  functions of z,  because of the
variation of  the lapse rate with height and the variation of the size
of turbulent  eddies with height.  They are in general also func-
tions of x and of y, because of variations of the lapse rate in the
horizontal and because of the  variation in the roughness due to
buildings and other irregularities  of terrain.
      To solve the diffusion equation under these conditions is a
very difficult problem when you have to allow for the variations
of all these  quantities, and  even then, as I mentioned,  this is a
simple and not a rigorous way of approaching atmospheric
diffusion.
      For a  first crude approximation,  we shall assume that AZ
is constant and equal to A,  and that the variation of C in the x
direction, taken to be the wind direction, and the variation in the
y direction are much smaller than the variation in the  z direction.
In that case  the equation reduces to equation 4.

                          dC
      Fz   E,  a constant, for x > 0 .   Fz = 0 for x < 0 .

      With these boundary conditions, assuming also that E is
 constant and not dependant on x,  y, or t, we can get an analytic
 expression for the solution, which is given by equation 5.
                    2Vt  c
                                   WA
 At the ground,  z equals zero, the concentration reduces to the
 very simple expression given in equation 6.  At Z - 0,
                          C =_Ł_ŁlVJi                     (6)
 SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
160                      NEIBKRGER

This equation is similar to the one that Dr.  Schmidt showed
yesterday.
      If, furthermore,  we concern ourselves with an air column
which is moving across the area with a constant velocity., U, in
the x direction, then t = x/U, and we have the expression shown
in equations 5a and 6a.

                             Z2U
          c_   E  )  2Vx     4Ax  _Z_ rf  /_&J3/U\f(5a)
          \^,   ——— t 	 ^            	 t- j. j. v_, 1    - -    t /
                                                 VAT/)
                                                        (6a)
      Equation 6 and 6a give some indication of the way that you
would expect the background concentration due to an area source
to change as the air moves across it.  It varies with the square
root of  the time that the air moves along its trajectory over the
source,  or, if the wind is constant over the area  source,  then it
varies as the  square root of the distance along the path  of the
column as it moves across its source.

      For a numerical example, let us assume that the  average
emission of hydrocarbons from automobile traffic in Los Angeles
is 2 tons per square mile per day and is  evenly distributed. This
corresponds to a value of E of approximately 10"9 gram per
square  centimeter per second.

      If the wind speed is 1 meter per second and you express the
concentration in parts per million by mass, which is commonly
called in meteorology the mixing ratio, the proportion by mass at
various  distances is shown in Table  1. The concentration is

                           TABLE  1

      HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS (ppm by mass)
          AT WINDSPEED OF 1 METER PER SECOND

      y                   Distance  Downwind, km
Diffusivity
    (A)
  5- 102
  103
  5- 103
  104
  5-104

                               SEC  TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5
0. 1
0. 41
0.29
0. 13
0. 09
0. 04
0. 9
1.2
0. 86
0. 38
0. 27
0. 12
2. 5
2.0
1. 4
0. 64
0. 45
0.20
6.4
3.2
2. 3
1.0
0. 72
0. 32
10.0
4. 1
2. 9
1. 3
0. 91
0. 41
20.0
4.9
3.4
1. 5
1. 1
0. 49
40.0
8.0
5.7
2.5
1.8
0.80

-------
DISPERSION AND DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS            161

expressed in parts per million,  for various values of A given in
the first column.   The distances downwind from the start of the
source area are given in kilometers.

      Values of A are really not well known, but in a  general way
the values near the top of the table correspond to fairly strong
inversions,  or moderate inversions, and values near the bottom
correspond to lapse conditions.

      Taking any one value of A,  it is seen that the concentration
increases downwind as the air passes the sources, as would be
expected.  On the assumptions made,  this variation is exactly as
the square root of the distance,  so that the rate of increase of
concentration tapers off as the air passes  over  more and more of
the source area.
      Looking now at the effect of the various coefficients of dif-
fusion, we see that the concentration is greatest for the slowest
diffusion,  corresponding to the inversion,  and is least for the
greatest diffusivity, corresponding to a relatively large lapse
condition.
      The computation thus gives a clear indication of the factors
controlling the concentrations of pollutants,  namely source in-
tensity, windspeed, and the intensity of turbulence,  represented
by the A,  which in turn is controlled by roughness of terrain,  at-
mosheric  stability, windspeed, and windshear.
      I have presented this discussion not  as an answer to the dif-
fusion problems but rather to focus attention on the elements that
need investigation.

      As long ago as 15 years,  when I was first consulted on the
air pollution problem,  I pointed out the urgent need for a census
of pollution sources to give their locations and intensity.  The
Air Pollution Control  District of Los Angeles County has carried
out such censuses to some extent.

      Figure 5 shows  a map made some years ago of pollution
sources over the Los  Angeles basin, as an indication of the type
of data that are needed.  The chemical and process industries
are very dense in the  section called Vernon, southeast of central
Los Angeles, and are sparse in residential areas.
      Some of the municipal incinerators shown on the map have
actually been closed down because they didn't meet the rules  of
the Air Pollution Control District.   This map is based on data
from 1952 for the most part.
      The isopleths of traffic density also  will have changed con-
siderably from the 1951-52 data represented here.  The lines are
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
                          NEIBERGER
Figure 5.  Map of traffic density and industrial sources of pollution in Los Angeles County.
labelled in terms of the percentage of the county total per square
mile.  The one labelled 0. 1,  for instance, has one-tenth of a per-
cent of the county total per square mile.  In  central Los Angeles
it reaches as much as 45/100ths of a percent per square  mile.
If one takes  this fraction  per square mile, multiplies it by the
total  amount of gasoline  consumed in Los Angeles County  in a
day,  and then by the fraction that comes out  in the exhaust un-
burned or partially burned,  one can get the amount of hydro-
carbons lost from automobile exhausts  per square mile.   So we
have  a pattern of isopleths which can be interpreted as the emis-
sion function,  E, as a function of x and y,  expressed in terms of
tons per square mile,  or whatever unit you choose.
       If,  corresponding to each of  these circles and triangles, we
had similar  information  about the  source  strength for each par-
ticular pollutant, we could draw isopleths  for them also and have
a function E for other  pollutants, for example SO^, or whatever
other  pollutants one is interested in.  This is the kind of map that
I  feel  is required to come from censuses  of the amount of pollu-
tion put  into the atmosphere.  This map was prepared on  a whole-
day basis, but. since traffic varies  with time of day hourly maps
of this sort should be plotted also.

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION AND DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS
                                                              163
     To evaluate the trajectory of the air as  it crosses the
source area,  it is necessary to know not only how the emission
intensity varies over an urban area but also how the  wind varies
over time and space.  Figures 6-10  represent the flow  pattern
over Los Angeles during a particular  24-hour period in 1954,
starting at the time of the maximum sea breeze, 2:30 p. m. ,
September 21, and ending at the same  time September 22.
     In Figure 6, you see that the air is streaming across the
basin from the coast to the mountains at the time of maximum  sea
breeze.  The solid lines with  arrows are streamlines and the
dashed lines are isotachs,  or velocity  lines in miles  per hour.  At
the coast the  speed is  16 miles per hour,  but farther inland it
drops off to 8 miles  per hour.
Figure 6. Streamlines (solid lines) and isotachs (lines of equal speed, dashed lines) for
       1430 PST September 21, 1954.  Speeds are given in miles per hour beside sta-
       tion arrows  and at ends of isotachs.
     Figure  7 shows the pattern 8 hours later.   By 10:30 p.m.
the land breeze has already sprung up, the air is flowing out from
the mountains and across the coast, with speeds of less than 4
miles per hour over most of the basin, and there is even a line,
enclosing an area for which the winds are less than  2 miles per
hour.  Thus the winds have become very light and from the land
on the whole.
SYMPOSIUM: AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
lb-1
                          NEIBERGER
 Figure 7. Streamlines (solid lines) and isotachs (lines of equal speed, dashed lines) for
        2230 PST September 21, 1954. Speeds are given in miles per hour beside sta-
        tion arrows and at ends of isotachs.

      Figure  8, for 6:30 a. m. shows the land breeze at roughly
 its maximum, with a 6-mile-an-hour wind right at the coast,  but
 over most of  the area the winds are  2 miles an hour or less, very
 light winds carrying the  air back from the inland area toward the
 coast and then off-shore.
      At 10;30 a. m. , Figure  9, the Seabreeze has already started.
 One interesting thing,  at 2:30 p. m.  September 21 the Seabreeze
 was all coining from the west coast of the basin,  but during the
 early part of  the Seabreeze there is a line of convergence, with
 part of the  Seabreeze coming from the south coast.  At 10:30 the
 speeds range  from 4 to 10 miles per hour, rather less than at
 2:30 p.m.   Figure 10 shows  the situation at 2:30 p.m.  September
 22, when the  Seabreeze is again near its maximum.

      This  series of charts shows how in a complicated topogra-
 phy, with light winds such as we have in Los Angeles in the warm
half of year,  there is quite a variation of winds with distance in-
land.  In computing diffusion in such terrain one cannot assume a
wind in a uniform direction with constant speed.

      Figure  11 shows a  trajectory computed from hourly maps
 such as the ones in the preceding figures.  This one is the trajec-
tory reaching Pasadena at noon on the 23rd of September,  1954.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION AND  DEPOSITION OF  POLLUTANTS
165
                 "   ,.,...        '
                      I' I'' !	1   "•—)->
                       K»1I II H>LI>
 Figure 8.  Streamlines (solid lines) and isotachs (lines of equal speed, dashed lines) for
          0630 PST September 22, 1954.  Speeds are given in miles per hour beside sta-
          tion arrows  and at ends of isotachs.
 Figure 9.  Streamlines (solid lines) and isotachs (lines of equal speed, dashed lines) for
          1030 PST September 22, 1954.  Speeds are given in  miles per hour beside sta-
          tion arrows and at ends oi isotachs.
SYMPOSIUM:   AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
                          NEIBERGER
 Figure 10. Streamlines (solid lines) and isotachs (lines of equal speed) dashed lines) for
         1430 PST September 22, 1954.  Speeds are given in miles per hour beside sta-
         tion arrows and at ends of isotachs.

The large circle is Pasadena,  and the  smaller circles show the
positions of the  air at the hours given by the numbers beside
them.  The air went in across the coast with the beginning of the
Seabreeze on September 22, streamed inland,  reached a point not
far from Pasadena that evening, meandered southwestward slowly
during the night, started  northeastward again with the beginning
of the seabreeze the next day and reached Pasadena 23 hours after
it  left the coast.  A little later the results of a computation of the
variation of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxides along this tra-
jectory will be presented.  To evaluate the concentrations along
the trajectory we should know,  in addition to these windflow pat-
terns, the variation of coefficient diffusivity, A, in the horizontal
and in the vertical.

      Figure  12  shows a temperature sounding typical of the warm
half of the year near the coast in Los Angeles.  This  is on a ro-
tated tephigram,  so that the constant temperature lines (labelled
in  °C) slope upward to the right and the dry adiabatic or constant
potential temperature  lines (labelled in °K) slope upward to the
left.  The numbers on the left of the sounding curve are heights
in  meters,  on the right water vapor mixing ratio in parts per
thousand.  The temperature decreases  with height for the first
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION AND  DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS
                                                                   167
                                               18
                                                    /I6
                                                   15
                                         2I/
                                          /  ,/l3 Pasadena
                                  23.. .22,' r<   .. 19
                                                        23-9-54
 TRAJECTORY  OF AIR REACHING PASADENA
 1200 PST   23  SEPTEMBER 1954
 MEASURED  VALUES AT  PASADENA - Eye irritation  28 (on scale 0-55)
                                  Oxidant;  30 pphm
                                  Hydrocarbons; 31 pphm
                                  Carbon Monoxide. 620 pphm
                                  Ald«hydet: 29 pphm
 Figure 11.  Trajectory of air arriving at Pasadena at noon September 23, 1954 with high
          values of oxidant and eye irritation.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
168
                           NEIBERGER
 few hundred meters are practically at the adiabatic  rate, and then
 there is an inversion of temperature of a considerable thickness,
 above which the temperature decreases again.

      Thus, instead of a constant value of A, corresponding to
 some particular lapse rate, it varies with height.  For the  com-
 putation that I will show, which  is an unrealistic one also, I have
 assumed that A is practically infinite for the layer of adiabatic
 lapse rate, and extremely  small beginning where the inversion
 starts.  The whole computation  is intended to be schematic.
      Figure 12 shows a typical sounding near the coast,  but
 actually even there it varies with time of day, and as the air
 moves  inland during  the day there is variation with position. For
 an accurate computation, then,  one should account for the varia-
 tion of A not only  with height, but  also with time and with distance
 600
 700
 800
900
IOOO —
  Figure 12.  Typical sounding at southern California coast in summer.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION AND DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS
169
in the horizontal.  Rigorous account of all these factors would be
too difficult to carry out analytically, but might be attempted by
high-speed electronic digital computers,  or perhaps as the next
paper will discuss,  by analog computers.
      The results of the computation of the hydrocarbon and car-
bon monoxide concentrations for the trajectory that we saw in
Figure 11, using the distribution of E corresponding to the traffic
density pattern shown in 1952, Figure  5,  are shown in Figure 13.
We assume  a parcel of air starting at the coast containing no hy-
drocarbons  and no carbon monoxide, and compute the amount  that
is added due to the traffic density as it  follows the trajectory
shown in Figure 11.  For  each segment of the trajectory the
source strength is assumed  proportional'to the corresponding
traffic density line,  and the  diffusion into the air parcel below the
inversion is  computed.  The computed hydrocarbon value for the
point where the trajectory reaches Pasadena at noon on the 23rd
       Sept. 22
Figure 13. Estimated accumulation of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide from motor traffic
        along trajectory of Figure 11.

is about 20 pphm, the observed value measured was  31  parts per
hundred million,  so that the computation gives a value of the same
general magnitude,  although not very close.

      For the carbon monoxide,  the computed value is about 700,
and the measured value was 620.  Thus even with the very crude
method of evaluation the computation comes not very far from the

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
170
                         NEIBERGER
measured values, on the assumption that the measured values are
due to the addition of the hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide from
automobile traffic without  any other sources and without any de-
struction of these contaminants.  Actually,  we know that there
are other sources, and there may also have been a background
value at the start, since the air may have moved out from the
land to  sea the previous day and then  moved in again.  Thus there
are ways of explaining the fact that the hydrocarbons are too low
on this  basis.  Similarly,  the fact that the  computed value of the
carbon  monoxide is  too high can be explained,  since presumably
some of the carbon monoxide was oxidized during the passage
across  the basin. But also,  of course, there are many other
deficiencies  in the computations and one should not take the cor-
respondence too seriously.

      Even this crude theory gives some promise that if the wind
and temperature conditions are forecast accurately and if we have
some way of deriving from them the values of A,  we could make
fair forecasts of the concentrations of pollutants for which the
area emission strength  is known.   As theory improves and data
for verification become available,  the accuracy of forecasts of
concentration will improve correspondingly.
      The principle of area emission intensities as opposed to in-
dividual source strengths  applies  not only to the forecasting prob-
lem, but also to the problem of zoning urban areas with  respect
to industrial developments and traffic patterns.  The criterion
should  be to limit the increases in sources to the maximum area
emission intensity that will not produce undesirable concentra-
tions.  This intensity for an area  may be produced by  individual
large sources or by many small ones.
      The zoning restrictions should  recognize this fact.  To ar-
rive at  a criterion for the acceptable area  emission intensity, as
for accurate forecasting,  it is necessary to know much more
about the process of diffusion over urban areas.  Recognizing
that the approach through  statistical studies of turbulent diffusion
may turn out to be the best way to get the answer, we  may still
couch the question in  the terms of the exchange coefficient A. The
question then would be how is A affected by the terrain of complex
urban areas, which consist of tall and low  buildings,  trees, hills,
heat sources from residences and industrial processes,  and mov-
ing vehicles.  How does it vary with the wind,  especially for low
average wind speeds,  in which condition the fluctuations have as
large magnitude as the average?  How does it  vary with lapse
rate and how does it vary with height  under all these circumstances?
When the variation of A  is known or the equivalent clarification of
the turbulent diffusion process is obtained by other means, it will
be necessary to apply it to the distribution of E for each urban

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION AND DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS           171

community under models typical of adverse weather conditions to
estimate the resulting concentrations of pollutants.   The integra-
tion of the diffusion equation or its equivalent will probably be too
difficult to carry out analytically, as I have already mentioned.
High-speed computers will have to be used.  But  when we have
adequate theory  and computing techniques and the knowledge  of
the area emission functions it will be possible to  compute the
effects of prolonged adverse weather conditions not yet experi-
enced or the effect of changing the emission distribution by the
addition of new sources or the  development of new commercial,
industrial, and residential areas.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                   Analog Computing Techniques
                                   Applied to Atmospheric Diffusion:
                                   Continuous Area Source*

                                   FRED V. BROCK, Meteorological
                                   Laboratories, The University of Michigan,
                                   Ann Arbor
Summary

     An electronic analog computer has been used to obtain solutions to the diffusion
equation.  The model is that of a continuous area source located on the ground in steady-
state conditions. The crosswind-integrated concentration is obtained as a continuous
function of distance downwind for discrete  height intervals.  The versatility of analog
simulation is demonstrated by introducing a variety of boundary conditions and other para-
meters into the basic model. With this approach the effects of an inversion, radioactive
decay, gravitational settling, ground reflection, ground absorption, etc. are conveniently
included.  Windspeed and eddy diffusivity can be arbitrarily varied with height. Analog
simulation may be extended to treat the problem of photochemical reactions that occur
during the diffusion process.
      The purpose of this paper is to show how the electronic an-
alog computer may be used to simulate atmospheric diffusion.
The example chosen to illustrate this technique  is that  of  diffusion
of particulate matter from an area source-on the ground in steady-
state conditions.  No specific physical problem  is envisioned here
but, as the solutions are obtained  in nondimensional parameters,
they could apply to a wide variety  of situations.   For example they
could be applied to the diffusion of industrial effluents from a
group of stacks, of automobile exhaust fumes from a  city,  or, at
the other end of the  scale, of pollen from a cluster of plants. The
only restriction on scale is one implied by the choice of a wind
profile,  a power law in this  case.

      In this problem the coordinate axes are  oriented with the
x-axis downwind, the y-axis  crosswind,  and the z-axis vertical.
The source,  as shown in Figure 1, is circular and centered at the
point (a/2 .0.0).   The mean wind vector is assumed to  have no
components in the y or z directions.  The source strength is as-
sumed to be  constant over the  source area.
* Paper No. 58 from the Meteorological Laboratories, Department of Engineering
  Mechanics, The University of Michigan. Publication No. 30 on Atmospheric Pollution
  by Aeroallergens. Grant No. Al C6 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infec-
  tious Diseases, Public Health Servi ce.
                                   173

-------
174
                             BROCK
  Figure 1. Orientation of the coordinate axis relative to the source and to the mean wind
         direction. The center of the circular source is located at the point (a/2, 0, 0)
         in the x, y, z space.
 THE MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICAL MODEL

       The diffusion equation as used here may be stated as

                                                  f 1*    XX  (1)
u(z)  AA    JL[K(Z)   -1*1+  _L
     3x    az  |_       dzj     dy
                                            <9y
with the following boundary conditions:

       X — 0    as    x —0  for all y,  z
              and    x,   |y| , z  -» ?°
      lim
      z ^C
                   J^  +  fxl
                    a z       J
where
        X  concentration
        u  mean wind speed in the x- direction
       K  eddy diffusivity
        f = fall  speed of the particulate
        X = decay  rate,  e. g.  radioactive decay
in consistent units.

The source strength is a constant Q over the  region defined by the
relation

      y.2 + (x   a/2)2    a2/4;  z  0.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
ANALOG COMPUTING TECHNIQUES                        175

The rate of loss of material to the ground is assumed to be pro-
portional to the "local" concentration near the ground with the
proportionality constant p.   The statement of the boundary condi-
tion at the ground was adopted from the work of Calder.

     If  the mean  wind speed and eddy diffusivity profiles are
given by
                rz i 1/7                    -• 6/7
     u(z)    U,    -     ,  K(z)    K,
then equation (1) may be written in nondimensional form as
follows:

ld^  -_ z- >/7   d  \z 6"   as] + F z  '/7 _^ _ D z- '" S    (2)
c ax          az \_      szj           az

where S is the nondimensional crosswind-integrated concentra-
tion defined as


                          1   '     Xdy.
                         Xo    ^

The constant Xo will be defined later.  The other nondimensional
parameters are
                   X   Cu,- 2   l~l


                   Z   —  z
                         zo
                                  - 6/7
                   F    *o  TO |       f


                         „    .„.,    6/7

                             lT-|       P
                   D -
The boundary conditions for equation (2) are

                   S — 0  as X — 0 for all Z
                         and as  X, Z — °°
lim
z-0
L  6/7 iŁ  + (F  P) sl  =  -B T!AX  x1!  [i - h(x  A)]
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
176                         BROCK

where
                           2 C O u  •
                   Xo
                             B K,
      All of the constants involved can be grouped into two types.
The first type,  scale parameters, includes ui,  KI, z\,  and z0.
These determine the conversion from nondimensional units to
physical units and, therefore, the scale of the problem.   The sec-
ond type may be called convenience parameters and have no phys-
ical significance.   These parameters, B and C, are used solely to
scale the problem  on the analog computer.
PREPARATION FOR ANALOG COMPUTATION
      Equation (2) is stated in terms of two independent variables,
X and Z.   Since the analog computer can integrate with respect to
only one independent variable,  one of them,  Z,  must be replaced
with finite differences.  Computer time  is used to represent X.
Implementation of finite differences requires a  new model, which
is shown in Figure 2.  The atmosphere is  divided into 10 layers
in the vertical,  and the thickness of the  layer increases exponen-
tially with height.  Each layer  incorporates the properties of the
atmosphere that it replaces.   For convenience, the layers are
labeled 1 through 10.   Thus the notation Sn(X) represents the
crosswind-integrated concentration in the  nth layer as  a function
of distance downwind.
      The  general finite difference expression for stations 1
through  9 is
      1 ds
      C dX
                  Z(n)'     Z(n + l/2)6/7  ,       „
(n)'1/7 ("
  Z(n)  [_A
                  A  Z(n)  [_A  Z(n + 1/2)     n+i    n


                  Z(n   l/2)6/7
                  AZ(n   I72T V n    n- i

                  F Z(n)-1/7
                   2 A Z(n)   

                  DZ(n)-'"Sn.                             (3)

The expression for station 1,  which is next to the ground,  is dif-
ferent because of the boundary conditions that must be inserted.
The boundary condition in finite difference form is
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
ANALOG COMPUTING TECHNIQUES
177
                  , 6/7
                        (Si   S0)  +  (F   P) Sc
                                                              (4)
10
n
Q S
9
8
7.5
7
6
K R
5
AG.
4
3


i
2.996
Z

1.897
1.386
1.204
1.050
0.7984

0.5977

0.4305
0.2876

8.1524
0.05163
-


-
-


-









ds UQ\XO x •
    Figure 2. Finite difference model showing the vertical coordinate axis relations.
From this,  an expression can be found for So,  which is a virtual
station below ground.  The  meaning of this is that in the finite
difference model, a virtual station below ground is given a con-
centration such that the boundary condition for  flux at the ground
is satisfied.   The boundary condition at Z — °°  is satisfied by
setting SIQ   0 which is at infinity due to  the exponential cell
spacing.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
178
             BROCK
ANALOG MODEL
      The physical model now consists of a stack of planes spaced
exponentially in the z direction.  It is supposed that each plane
has a capacity for containing some of the  diffusing substance just
equal to that of the layer of atmosphere that it replaces.  At a
given point  in x,  a traverse in the  z direction shows the properties
of the  atmosphere lumped at discrete intervals.  This model can
be simulated with an electric analog,  where each of the circuit
components is analogous to some property of the atmosphere.  A
segment  of such a circuit is shown in Figure  3.  The analogies
shown were developed from the similarity of  the node differential
equations for a simple case,
       C  dV
       CndT
          J    - 2 V  + V    )
          n+1      n    n-i
   (Az)  u
       n   dx
    _
    (Az)
                            n+l
2X  + X    )
  n     n-1
 To perform the simulation,  set the resistor Rn proportional to
 Az/k, the capacitor Cn proportional to Az Q, and voltage V pro-
 portional to concentration.   The problem time t will represent
 distance downstream.  All these relations are stated as propor-
 tionalities so that scale factors can be used to provide reasonable
  ^WV
           V,
-A/W-^A/W
  -VVVjAA/V
•AA/V
             (AZ)n/K
                          \n
          TIME=x
                                     dx   "
 Figure 3. Typical station in the passive network analog showing the analogy between
         circuit components and the physical properties of the atmosphere pertinent to
         the diffusion problem.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
ANALOG COMPUTING TECHNIQUES
179
values of resistance and capacitance.   In general, one  may relate
electrical resistance to atmospheric resistance to diffusion, and
electrical capacitance to the capacity of a layer of the atmosphere
to hold the diffusing substance.   The complete network analog is
shown in Figure 4,  along with the electronic analog and a repre-
sentation of the physical model.
                -s0
          Electronic Analog
              Circuit
                                                Finite Difference
                                                 Physical Model
  Figure 4.  Electronic analog, passive network analog, and physical, finite difference
          model of the atmosphere. Note that each group of components represents a
          layer of the atmosphere.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
180
                            BROCK
      The passive-circuit analog was not used in this study,  but it
is helpful to construct it on paper because of the insight it provides.
This is particularly useful in determining the method of applying
the  boundary conditions.
      The electronic analog circuit could be designed directly from
the  passive network or from the set of simultaneous differential
equations.  The latter method is much the easier course after the
equations are reduced to the form
                dS
                dX
+ cn
The principal element in the electronic analog is the integrating
amplifier, which can be used to represent one station as shown in
Figure  5.  In the passive-network analog, there was a direct
                        rGH
                                    -s,
                       O.I or I M
                                            HIGH-GAIN, d-c
                                           AMPLIFIER
      —Q— = COEFFICIENT POTENTIOMETER
 Figure 5. Typical station in the active or electronic analog circuit. The concentrator! is
        represented as a voltage, and equation coefficients as potentiometer settings.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
ANALOG COMPUTING TECHNIQUES                        181

correspondence between the circuit elements and the physical
problem, while in the  electronic analog,  there exists a one-to-one
correspondence between the circuit elements and the defining
equation.  The coefficients  a, b, and c are set on the correspond-
ingly designated coefficient potentiometers.  The integrating am-
plifier sums the three  inputs, integrates the sum,  and inverts the
sign.  Ordinarily, the  gain  of the integrating amplifier is unity,
set by the 1-megohm input resistor and 1-microfarad feedback
capacitor.  If  one of the  coefficients is greater than unity, the
corresponding input resistor used is 0. 1 megohm, which provides
a gain of 10.   This  is necessary because the maximum setting of
the coefficient potentiometers is 1.

     The electronic circuit is much more flexible than the pas-
sive network,  permitting almost any conceivable form of boundary
conditions to be set up readily.   In this case,  a voltage is gener-
ated and fed into the network at So  such that equation (4) is  satis-
fied.
     The accuracy of  the solutions obtained with this method can
be demonstrated by analogy.  When the problem is set up on a
computer, it is a physical system that is designed to behave like
the atmosphere with respect to  diffusion.  This same model has
been tested previously. ^  With a different input arrangement it
simulated diffusion from  an infinite line source.  The solutions
obtained were  compared with available analytical solutions "
where the errors were found to be  less than 5 percent.
 RESULTS OF COMPUTATION
      In Figures 6 through 10 the solutions have been plotted as
 lines  of constant, crosswind-integrated concentration for cases I
 through V, respectively.  The following table shows what effects
 were  used in each case.

                           TABLE 1

    LIST  OF SOLUTIONS OBTAINED AND THE VALUES OF
          THE PARAMETERS FOR TIME DECAY D,
  GRAVITATIONAL SETTLING F, GROUND SINK EFFECT P,
          AND THE PRESENCE OF AN INVERSION I

                                     Solution

 Parameter
    D
    F
    P
    I

 SYMPOSIUM:  AIR  OVER CITIES
I
0
0
0
NO
II
0
0
0
YES
III
0
0
2
NO
IV
0
2
2
NO
V
2
0
0
NO

-------
182
                             BROCK
      A typical set of values will give an idea of the magnitude of
these parameters. If we choose zo = zi  10  cm,  KI  10  cm /sec,
the other parameters become
                      f    20  cm/sec
                      X    0.002 sec-'

To express  X in terms of half-life, this becomes about 6 hours.
   0.2 -
     0
                         12
                                             24
                                                    28
                                                          32
                                16     20
                            Distance  Downwind, X
   Figure 6.  Lines of constant, crosswind-integrated concentration in the X, Z plane.
           D = F = P = 0.  No inversion.
 EXTENSION OF THE  METHOD

       Analog computation can be used profitably in solution of
 partial differential equations with up to three independent vari-
 ables.  In diffusion problems  these will be time and two space
 variables or three space variables.   In the case,  say,  of three
 space variables,  x,  y, and z,  one of them, usually x, will be  rep-
 resented continuously by computer time.  The  other two will be
 represented by finite differences.

       Arbitrary variation of any parameter as  a function of any of
 the independent variables is readily accomplished.  The function
                                 SEC  TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
ANALOG COMPUTING TECHNIQUES
   1.4
                                                                          183
                              12       16       20      24       28      32      36
                                   Distance   Downwind,   X
   Figure 7.  Lines of constant, crosswind-integrated concentration  in the X, Z plane.
             D = F = P = 0.  Inversion at Z =  1.897.
   0.2 -
0
                 8
                                                                28
                                                                        32
                               12       16       20      24
                                 Distance    Downwind.  X
   Figure 8. Lines of constant,  crosswind-integrated concentration  in the X, Z plane.
            D = F = 0.  P = 2.  No inversion.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
                                   BROCK
                             12       16       20       24
                                 Distance   Downwind,  X
                                                               28
                                                                        32
Figure 9. Lines of  constant, crosswind-integrated concentration in the X, Z plane.
          D = 0. F = P = 2. No inversion
0.2
   0
                                                                28
                                                                        32
                             12       16        20       24
                                  Distance    Downwind,  X
Figure 10.  Lines of constant, crosswind-integrated concentration in the X, Z plane.
           D = 2.  F = P = 0. No inversion.
                                       SEC  TECHNICAL  REPORT A62-5

-------
ANALOG COMPUTING TECHNIQUES                        185

may be in analytic, graphical, or tabular form.  Boundary condi-
tions of almost any desired form can be used, including multiple
sources, ground reflotation of particulates, etc.

     Not so readily accomplished,  but still possible,  is computa-
tion of the diffusion of the products  of chemical reactions or radio-
active  decay in the atmosphere.  It is possible to compute simul-
taneously the diffusion of the original substance and of the products
of reactions.
     The most  severe restriction on this method is that the
amount of equipment required  increases with the complexity of
the problem, so that each analog computer installation will have
its own limit.
                        REFERENCES

 1.  Brock, Fred V. ,  1961.   Analog computing techniques applied
      to atmospheric diffusion:  continuous line source.  Tech-
      nical Report No.  2 on National Science Foundation Grant
      G-11404.  The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
 2.  Calder,  Kenneth L. , 1961.  Atmospheric diffusion of partic-
      ulate material, considered as a boundary value problem.
      Journal of Meteorology.  18(3):413-416.
 3.  Button, O. G. ,  1953. Micrometeorology.  McGraw-Hill Book
      Company, New York
      The author wishes to acknowledge his grateful appreciation
 to Professor E. Wendell Hewson for his consistent interest and
 constructive advice.  The wholehearted cooperation and assistance
 of Mrs. Anne C.  Rivette is also appreciated.
                         DISCUSSION

      MR.  GIFFORD:  Just to throw your last remarks into a
little bolder relief, would you tell us, considering that you showed
really a tremendous amount of computations, five or six complete
fields for essentially different  diffusion problems, about how long
it took to program the  machinery and to actually run off these
solutions ?
      MR.  BROCK:  The question is a little difficult to answer
because it happens that the  problem is  similar to a previous one
that I did, but I think that programing the machine itself takes
very little time.  Designing the particular circuit would take


SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
186
                            BROCK
perhaps an hour.  It would take several hours to compute the co-
efficients for the various parts in the problem.  It took me longer
actually to decide how the boundary condition ought to be set up
than to do all the rest of the work combined.
      Running the problem doesn't take very long, because we
set it up so that the particular solution is run out in about 15
minutes,  and it is plotted out in graphical form for us.  I then
replotted in the form that you  saw to make it a little more com-
pact. So this work took me  about two weeks,  most of which was
spent worrying about how the boundary condition ought to be set
up.
      MR. GIFFORD:  It seems to me that in connection with
urban pollution problem and area sources, there are essentially
two  separate problems, of which  you have treated one.  In the one
problem you have an area source, and this would correspond
somewhat to the megalopolis problem, where you are interested
maybe in the next state or the next town,  that is, what is coming
from a large area upwind.
      For the other problem you really don't care very much
about what happens outside of town but you are extremely con-
cerned about what goes on within  the area  source.  And I wondered
if you had given any thought to the simulation of this second prob-
lem.

      MR. BROCK:  Essentially there is a difference in scale,
although when you deal with what  is happening immediately within
the source, so to speak,  you have to be more careful about the
simulation of the source.  I think that could probably cause more
trouble than anything else.   It is reasonable to assume that the
source is constant over a circular area, when you get far enough
away from it.   Up close you would probably have a series of point
sources,  and the problem then it  to simulate these.   If you have a
field of point sources you must produce this electrically,  and in-
evitably it would come down to a question of resolution.  There is
a limit to how  fine  a  resolution one can get in analog computation.
It is usually determined by the amount of equipment. However,
it is like  treating the  problem of multiple sources, where you
have a scattering of sources.  I think that  we  could reasonably do
something with this.

      MR. GIFFORD:  I might remark that we have  just begun to
think about this as  a  result of the very interesting visit that we
had from Mr.  Brock at Oak Ridge.  We can't  get it on the com-
puter until December. But as a first approach, what we did was
to apply  a mathematical coordinate.   This is really  what I wanted
to ask you about.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5
                                                       GPO 825111-7

-------
ANALOG COMPUTING TECHNIQUES                        187

     To get the detail in the city, we are going to change coor-
dinates from X and Y to R and S, where R    1 - E~x, and
S   1   E~y.  That means that when x   0, say,  than R   0, and
when x   °° ,  R  1, and when x - 1 it turns  out that R  = ~ 0. 8.
That means that if you apply this transformation then you can put
most of your equipment inside the city and not worry too much
about what  goes on in the suburbs or in the next town.   We don't
have any results, but if you have any words of wisdom for us,  I
would be glad to hear them.  Do you think we will get anywhere
with that kind of approach?

     MR.  BROCK:  I am sure that you will.   The computers are
of immense flexibility.  You really can do almost anything that
you want to do,  if you persevere long enough.

     This  is  an excellent  transformation.  Of course,  the one
that I used  to  reduce the z axis from infinity down to something
finite that I could handle, and turning it around and applying it  to
X or Y is very much the same thing.  You simply explode your
scale then,  which can be done very easily.
     I would  be very much interested in seeing the results on
this, because I think you do have a good approach.
     MR.  LARSEN:  Do you believe that a time-sharing of analog
computer components would be a feasible method of cutting down
on the amount of equipment needed for a three-dimensional simu-
lation of air pollution over a city?

     MR.  BROCK:  We have been considering this problem re-
cently.   There have been two innovations in the analog art re-
cently.   One of them is time sharing -- well,  both of them are
time sharing in a sense, and they have very earnest proponents.
Now, so far as  I know, and I have been  in contact with some of
the  leaders in this field, this has not yet resulted in anything that
can be brought to bear on our problem.  It has been used in other
problems, which can be described as  something essentially like
the  diffusion equation.  But in other things,  such as fluid flowing
through a pipe,  for example, this time-sharing business has
worked.  The leaders in the field as of August of this year, and
by leaders I mean specifically Professor Howe of the University
of Michigan and some people from the  West Coast,  have agreed
that at the present time this time-sharing could not be applied to
the  problems we have in meteorology.   The problem seems to be
that when you time share you introduce  more errors, and as you
do more of  this to save on equipment, errors multiply and grow
to the point that the computation becomes useless.  I don't want
to go on record as saying that this won't work in the future,  but
as of the present it does not seem to.


SYMPOSIUM:   AIR OVER CITIES

-------
188                         BROCK

      MR. LARSEN:  So if you wish to simulate pollution.,  say,
over Cincinnati and from all points and from multiple sources
you would still require hundreds of analog components to simulate
a whole town at one time.

      MR. BROCK: It depends on the detail you want.  If you want
to go into all the gory detail at once, then yes --it would take an
awful lot  of equipment.  But by no means would it completely
solve the  problem of handling partial diffusion by analog
computers.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                  Dispersion Calculations for
                                  Multiple Sources

                                  FRANCIS POOLER, Jr., Weather Bureau
                                  Research Station, Laboratory of Engineering
                                  and Physical Sciences, R. A. Taft Sanitary
                                  Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
Summa ry
     Several ways in which multiple sources may be collectively described are ex-
amined, together with appropriate diffusion formulation. Since the main objective in
developing models to calculate concentrations is to eliminate the necessity of direct
air quality measurements, u pragmatic approach is recommended, both to simplify the
required calculations and to incorporate diverse observations of pollutant  behavior into
the models used.  Some possible uses of the calculations are discussed, and necessary
further observations  suggested.
      Calculation of pollutant concentrations from the numerous
sources in urban areas is a difficult task.  We probably will never
be able,  or even be asked, to derive models capable of explaining
all possible variations of concentrations over an area, because no
one has any use for such detailed information.  What are desired,
and likely will be for some time to come,  are values of calculated
concentration that show  details  comparable  to those that can be
observed.  The apparent objective in making calculations is thus,
essentially, to be able to calculate values of concentration that
match measured values.  The ultimate objective is to develop
means of calculating  concentrations to supplant direct  measure-
ments.

      This general objective can be divided  into at least five cat-
egories,  corresponding  to the uses that might be made of calcula-
tions.  The categories that occur to me are:

1.  To estimate concentrations  for particular times and places,
for  correlation with some known effect.
2.  To estimate the contributions to the total pollutant  loading
from  particular classes of sources: from  different source areas,
or from different kinds of sources within the same area.
3.  To delineate  the  spatial  distribution of concentrations.
4.  To estimate the variability of concentrations for averaging
times less than the sampling interval of the instrument used.
5.  To estimate extreme concentrations that could occur at a
given location.

      As a general statement of the calculation problem,  we are
trying to determine the concentration at any point in space and

                                189

-------
 190                        POOLER

time.  The concentration is made up of the contributions from a
field of sources, with this source field a function of the space
and time coordinates. The  contribution of concentration from any
point in this  source field is  the product of the field  strength and a
spatial probability distribution function, which itself varies with
time.  Symbolically,
             X(x,y, z, t) = /  /  /  /  Q(x,y, z, t)D   (t)
                         7xyyyzvt              xyz  •

where  O is the source strength of a  point in the 4-dimensional
field of space (x, y, z) and time (t) and  D is a spatial distribution
function,  also dependent on time. The total concentration at a
point is obtained by integrating over the 4-dimensional field. It
may be noted that the source field is to be integrated, and not the
concentration field.

      In any real case we might be dealing with,  we will never be
able to specify either Q or  D precisely and totally.  We are forced,
by practical  necessity,  to approximate the sources  by a collective
source description, and to  approximate  the probability density
fields  by a collective  probability density. In other words,  we are
attempting to describe a highly complicated matter  by making
some simplifying assumptions, in order to derive mathematical
analogs that  can be used to estimate concentrations. In any analogy,
comparison  is made only between limited parts of the two subjects
compared; in an analogy of multiple-source dispersion,  one must
choose the portion of  the problem that is to be most closely de-
scribed by means of the analog.  The portion to be described is
determined primarily by the purpose in  making the  calculations.
In other words, there is no  all-purpose  model that can be used to
satisfy all the uses to which multiple-source dispersion calcula-
tions might be put.  The particular model used will depend on three
factors: (1) the use to be made of the results; (2) the source data
available; and (3) the  meteorological data available.
      The models that can be employed fall into three general
classes,  which can be named according to the source description
employed. These classes I shall  call the cloud-source model, the
grid-point-source  model, and the area-source model. In the
cloud-source model, the emissions  from groups of  sources are
followed forward in time, and the concentration from any  source
grouping can be calculated for as many points as desired.  In
equation form,
                 xp (t)=ZJ/  Q- (*)D._,_ (t) .
The source grouping can be considered as an emitted cloud per
unit time,  the cloud having some definable initial probability
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION CALCULATIONS: MULTIPLE SOURCES         191

density. The subsequent travel and spread of the instantaneous
cloud can be approximately described in terms of any available
meteorological measurements, so that it is not necessary to as-
sume spatial or temporal uniformity in either the mean flow or
the turbulence processes.  The amount of calculation necessary
with this kind of model increases in direct proportion to the num-
ber of source clouds used to describe the sources, since  generally
both the initial  cloud distributions and  the subsequent mean mo-
tions and diffusion rates will be different for each cloud.   When it
is obviously necessary to consider a varying field of motion, which
usually will be  the case when pollution must be followed for at
least an appreciable fraction of a day,  this kind of model is prob-
ably required.  However,  if such long travel times must be con-
sidered,  the exact details of the real source geometry  become
rather unimportant,  so that it  will generally be  possible to keep
the source clouds limited to a  manageable number.  Dr. Frenkiel
used this kind of approach with, I believe, a digital  computer to
estimate concentrations in the Los Angeles basin using clouds for
his model. This same general approach can, of course, be used
with a limited number of individual sources,  in  which case the
contribution from each source to  a point can be  calculated individ-
ually by a conventional formula.
      In the other two kinds of models,  both temporal and hori-
zontal spatial uniformity of motions are assumed, so that the rel-
ative dispersion from source to receptor doesn't depend on the
actual location of either,  but only on the relative locations.  In
the grid-point-source model,   a series of sources of identical
geometry are used to represent the real source, so that the spa-
tial variations  of source strength can be simulated to an accuracy
determined by  the spacing of the  grid-points.  The concentration
at a point is then determined as the sum of the contributions from
each source point, or
                       X  --
                        p   —u   yz
      The most practical use of this kind of model is to calculate
 concentration patterns for an area, and usually it will be desirable
 to obtain as much detail in the spatial variation of concentration
 as is available from the source description.  Thus it is easiest to
 use this model to calculate values for a grid of points with the
 same spacing as the source  grid.  A grid  of D values can be cal-
 culated, the products  of Q and D at each grid point obtained, and
 these products added to calculate the concentration for one point.
 The grid of D values must then be shifted relative to the source
 grid, and the  arithmetic repeated,  to obtain concentrations for
 each point of the grid.  Thus, the amount of simple arithmetic
 SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
192                        POOLER

necessary is proportional to the square of the number of grid
points.  The easiest, cheapest,  and most accurate way to do such
arithmetic is with the  aid of a digital computer.
      A somewhat simpler source grid can be devised if concen-
trations at only a small number of points  are desired, by spacing
the grid points in such a way that the relative contribution from
each source point to the receptor point is about the same; this
can be done by spacing the points so that their  density is an in-
verse function of distance from the receptor point.

      The third model is the  area source: the concentration at a
point is determined as the integrated contribution from the up-
wind source area,  or

                    X   -    /  — D (x)
                      P ~~   J   u  z
                             x

      The assumption is made in such  a formulation that the
source  area is sufficiently extensive in the crosswind dimension
that it can be  treated the same  as an infinite crosswind  source,
As Mr. Brock showed, you could also  make the distribution func-
tion two-dimensional rather than one-dimensional as shown.  In
view of the fact that there has been quite a bit of coverage of area
sources by Mr. Brock and Dr.  Neiberger, and by Dr. Schmidt
yesterday, there is no need  to go into any further detail to show
the use that might be made of such calculations.
      When it comes to setting  down some exact expression for a
model,  three  steps are required.  The  first is a visualization of
the entire dispersion process that is to be described.  This re-
quires a good imagination,  for  we will rarely be able to actually
see more than small glimpses of the real situation,  and we must
fill in the greater part of the total picture with imaginary plumes,
telescoping time scales,  and other devices.

      Some attention must also be given to the  source inventory
that will be used,  for  the way in which the sources are to be col-
lectively described is  partially dependent on the way the disper-
sion is  to be treated,  and the dispersion will very obviously de-
pend on the geometry  of the  sources.  It will be necessary to con-
sider what purpose the calculations are to serve, what kind of
detail will be  available from  the source data,  and what sorts of
meteorological data will be available.  From these considerations,
we must settle on the  type and general form of the model to be
used. The source data can then be adapted to the model.
      The second step is to break down the total dispersion proc-
ess into smaller components that can each be described by means

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION CALCULATIONS: MULTIPLE SOURCES        193

of some mathematical expression. For this step,  I think the best
thing to do is look out the window, or sit on top of Mount Royal,
perhaps to watch the  auto-correlation of velocity, or the growth
and decay of eddies,  or whatever it is  that one chooses for de-
scribing diffusion.  This step requires  the ability to be a good  ob-
server. I  think both the first and  second steps,  the visualization
and the observation, require the capability of a meteorologist,  and
therefore  I wouldn't trust a model not made up by a meteorologist.

     The  third step is to use the  meteorological measurements
that may be available to indicate the  dispersion that has been ob-
served and described. I think a great deal of confusion can be  avoided
if we recognize that there is no such thing as a definitive set of
meteorological measurements  that will describe dispersion for
even the simplest of circumstances.  We must therefore use avail-
able meteorological data as indices of dispersion conditions,  and
not regard them as diffusion measurements. If we choose to use a
meteorological parameter as a continuous index, rather than as one
element of a discrete classification system, it will be possible to
end up with some extremely odd dimensional units for numerical
coefficients, even though the original form of an equation  is dimen-
sionally logical.  This step requires a very careful judgement, and
probably few observers would  choose identical values to describe
the same process.
      Even with rather scant meteorological data to work with, it
will be possible to devise some elaborate formulations that pro-
vide a  quantity of doubtful detail.  Since  these details cannot be
checked, and may not be valid  to  start  with,  it will often be pos-
sible to simplify a formulation without  any real loss of accuracy.
It will  often be instructive to plot  curves of calculated concentra-
tion versus  distance from a source,  using linear scales,  to see
what the influence of varying parameters in a formulation may be.
In this way, it  may turn out that  a large error factor really doesn't
matter, because  the  erroneous contribution is only a small
fraction of the total from all sources. The degree to which a form-
ulation is  simplified will thus depend in part on the formulation
itself and  on the use to be made of it.

      Since  the form of an equation as used will depend on the
means available for making the calculations, I don't believe there
is much point to setting down specific formulae. With an area-
source model,  it  is easiest to  set up some expression that can be
integrated analytically or electronically; with a  grid-point source
model, quite unwieldy functions can be used, since the expression
need be numerically evaluated  only for discrete points;and with the
volume-source model, dispersion by the mean flow may mask some
of the smaller-scale  diffusion  processes, so that mass continuity of
the mean flow will be a primary requirement of a formulation.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
194
                           POOLER
      Multiple-source dispersion calculations at present involve
too much guesswork and arbitrary extrapolation to be regarded
as having a scientific merit,  and therefore I don't think they
should be judged by scientific standards.  Improvements will come
about by narrowing the margin  of uncertainty in our estimates of
dispersion parameters and by increasing our knowledge of the
relationships between dispersion and available measurements.
The greatest area of uncertainty is in the area of generally great-
est significance in determining pollutant concentrations in urban
areas: we have very little data  concerning the vertical distribution
of mean flow and turbulence, or of pollutant  stratification.  We
also lack a physical basis for tying such data together, i. e.,  our
theories are incomplete. We know little concerning the ultimate
disposition of pollution; we can't very well say where  something
is going unless we first know what it is, and this requires atten-
tion to the physical and chemical forms in which the pollutants
exist  in the atmosphere.

      In spite of these  inadequacies,  I think we can, at present,
make calculations for limited situations that are sufficiently ac-
curate to serve a useful purpose. If such results justify our in-
exact methods we can always incorporate new findings and more
complete theories into the methods, and thereby extend the utility
of such calculations.

                         DISCUSSION

      CHAIRMAN NEIBERGER:  I have a feeling it might help
some of the people here if you  will describe  how one would go
about getting the D function.

      MR. POOLER: Well,  this is the thing I had in mind when I
said,  first look out the window. I don't believe there is any general
way to go about it, primarily because it depends on the model you
are using. For instance, if  you are  interested in dispersion over
scales of several miles,  which would be an urban area diffusion
problem, you would have to come out with some  distribution func-
tion that fit what the atmosphere was actually doing.  This is the
main  requirement, and how you actually do it,  I think requires
imagination more than anything.  There are certainly numerical
measurements or calculations from some of the  work that Dr.
Hilst  has done,  as an example,   or some of the work from large
sources,  our TVA studies, where we can see the dispersion
measurement over fairly large  scales,  and we can use these
numerical data as a beginning point.  But I think the problem is
that there is so little that we know about large-scale diffusion
that at this point we simply have to make up  a great deal.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
DISPERSION CALCULATIONS: MULTIPLE SOURCES         195
     DR. GIFFORD:  There are really three parts to this prob-
lem.  First,  you have got to get the material into the air,  and
then there is the part you have been talking about,  which is carry-
ing it through the air,  and then the other part, which concerns
the effect on people. Also there is  the problem of measuring con-
centrations after some residence time  of materials in the air.
Since you highlighted the uncertainties  and difficulties and  general
unsatisfactory nature of the second of these, I wondered if you
would be willing to  hazard a guess  as to whether the atmospheric
contribution is more or less uncertain,  for example, than  our
present knowledge of sources and of concentration measurements?
In other words, does it make much difference whether we are a
little uncertain about it?
      MR.  POOLER:  This is a very good point to bring out, be-
cause I think at the present  time the estimates we can get of the
sources and also the accuracy of many of the concentration mea-
surements  are probably about the same order of accuracy  as our
dispersion  calculations --of equal uncertainty in all three areas.

      MR.  HILST: You are not suggesting that on this account it
is worthwhile to take less than the  best we can get?
      MR.  POOLER: We  should all aim for perfection, but we
will never know if we have reached it.
 SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                  Some Effects of City Structure on the
                                  Transport of Airborne Material in
                                  Urban Areas

                                  W. A. PERKINS, Dept. of Chemistry and
                                  Chemical Engineering, Stanford University,
                                  Palo Alto, California
Summary
    Transport of airborne material in urban areas is compared to the transport
mechanisms observed and calculated for open areas.  The effects of urban areas in modi-
fying general weather patterns are examined, with emphasis on the effects of specific
location, size of the urban area, wind speed and cloud cover, and vertical temperature
gradient. Meteorological and air pollution surveys conducted in several citiss are re-
viewed, and conclusions based on these surveys are presented. The degree of loss of
particulate matter by impaction on exposed surfaces in urban areas is considered;
theoretical and experimental impaction data are reviewed.
      There is reason to believe that the transport of airborne
material in urban areas,  particularly under certain meteorolog-
ical conditions,  might differ substantially from the transport that
has been observed in  open areas.   Buildings and  other structures
increase the surface roughness,  thereby enhancing atmospheric
diffusion associated with mechanically induced turbulence.  In
addition, the  large number of surfaces within an  urban area af-
fords a potential loss  of particulate airborne material by impac-
tion processes.

      Unfortunately the type of experimental data I would like to
present  to illustrate these and other effects are not now  available.
What are needed,  of course, are quantitative observations on the
diffusion of material within cities for  direct comparison with
measured diffusion in open areas.   To be meaningful these  dif-
fusion studies require an  air sampling network on a suitable
scale, together  with a controlled source of tracer material that
can be emitted in known amounts and,  if particulate,  in a pre-
scribed  particle-size  range.  Collateral meteorological  observa-
tions on a scale commensurate with the travel distances are es-
sential.   Results from this type of investigation are a necessary
starting point  for the  computer techniques  suggested by Hilst at
this  meeting,  if the results of these computations are to be rep-
resentative of actual transport within cities.
      In the absence of suitable field data,  one must fall on in-
direct evidence  that suggests possible differences in the transport
                                 197

-------
198                        PERKINS

of airborne  materials within cities as compared with open areas.
Perhaps the most pertinent line of evidence is the well-established
fact that air temperatures within cities are significantly different
from those in surrounding open areas.  The differences are evi-
dent both in the horizontal temperature distribution near the
ground and in the vertical temperature  gradient.
      The fact that cities are noticeably warmer than their sur-
roundings has been known for over a century based on records
taken from fixed  stations inside and outside of certain cities.  '
2, 3  The first measurements of temperature distribution at
ground level within a city were obtained by Schmidt in Vienna^
using equipment carried  in a car.  A similar technique was used
by Sundborg  to obtain comprehensive measurements of air
temperature throughout the city of Uppsala.  The first indication
that the vertical temperature gradient was modified in an urban
area was obtained by Blachin and Pye^  during their investigation
of the temperature patterns in Bath, England, which lies in a
steep valley.   In a number of cases nighttime temperatures taken
from the hillside showed little or no inversion over the city, al-
though inversions were established within  the valley on either
side of the city.

      With the above surveys as background, a series of detailed
measurements on urban modification of air temperature was
undertaken by the Aerosol Laboratory,  Stanford University. The
results have been reported by Duckworth and Sandberg'  and have
been fully described by Mitchell and others at this  meeting.
      A  few comments regarding the objectives of these surveys
may be of interest.  Since modification of  air temperature by a
city is less pronounced during the  day than at night, primary
emphasis was given to nighttime observations.  In  designing the
program four points were given consideration.  First, the attempt
was made to determine by refined  techniques whether temperature
effects observed thus  far were characteristic of cities in general
or whether these phenomena were  peculiar to specific locations.
The fact that urban temperature modification had been noted in
several communities in earlier years certainly suggested that
this was a general characteristic,  but additional data obtained
with improved equipment seemed desirable.

      Second, the effect of city size on  the extent of urban modi-
fication had not been investigated systematically.   Accordingly,
measurements were made in San Francisco, San Jose,  and Palo
Alto to represent large,  intermediate,  and small cities  located
close  enough within the Bay Area to have similar over-all weather
conditions.  Conditions are particularly similar during the summer
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SOME EFFECTS OF CITY STRUCTURE                      199

months, when the study was undertaken.

      Third,  additional information was needed to establish the
effect of wind speed and cloud cover on urban temperature
modification.  On the basis of available  data these two factors
appeared to be the most important over-all weather factors con-
trolling the urban effect.

      Finally, and perhaps most important,  measurements of
vertical temperature  gradients taken concurrently with the
horizontal temperature traverses were needed.  It is doubtful
that the hillside observations taken in Bath were truly repre-
sentative of the free air temperature gradient.  Accordingly,
wiresounde temperature measurements  were made within and
outside each  of the  three cities in conjunction with the ground-
level  measurements taken with sensors  mounted on automobiles.
      Since the investigation in the Bay Area was completed,
DeMarrais has reported on vertical temperature  gradient ob-
servations in Louisville.   These urban-area gradients were
compared with typical open-area vertical gradients obtained in
Idaho and New England.  The findings of DeMarrais are in accord
with those described by Duckworth and Sandberg.

      Typical examples of nighttime temperature surveys in
San Francisco and San Jose have been shown previously.  (See
Figures 1, 2,  and 3   Mitchell)  Air temperature is highest in the
most  built-up area  and lowest in the open areas.  A similar pat-
tern was found for Palo Alto.  In all three cities maximum temp-
erature differences were associated with light wind and clear sky,
and under comparable conditions the differences were greater
the larger the city.  Thus  in order of decreasing city size,  the
maximum observed temperature differences between urban and
surrounding areas were 20°F,  14. 2°F,  and 12. 6°F.  Representa-
tive temperature differences in the three cities were approximate-
ly one half the maximum values.

      Figure 1 shows one example of temperature gradients ob-
served in built-up and open areas in San Francisco under condi-
tions  favorable for  the development of a moderate temperature
differential across  the city.  Typically,  the strong inversion
associated with the open areas is absent within the city at low
level.  In the  example shown, the gradient in the built-up area is
essentially neutral  below 100 feet and isothermal aloft, with a
slight inversion at  125 feet.  In many cases the gradient taken
within the city showed a marked inversion at about two building
heights above the surface, with neutral  conditions below.
      From the several trials conducted in the three  Bay Area
cities coupled with earlier and more recent observations obtained

SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
 200
                            PERKINS
                             TEMPERATURE 
-------
SOME EFFECTS OF CITY STRUCTURE                      201

     From the standpoint of atmospheric diffusion within cities,
the urban temperature modification tends to reduce the extreme
range of conditions expected.   Lapse conditions will be found
during the day if such conditions exist in the open.  Inversion
conditions in the  lower layers within a city are not likely at
night, however,  and in any case will be less well-developed than
in open areas.  Thus a strong inversion in open areas associated
with light winds  and clear  sky are accompanied by neutral condi-
tions within built-up areas.  If the sky is overcast or the wind
speed is high, the urban temperature differential will be elimin-
ated and neutral atmospheric stability can be expected both inside
and outside the urban area.  As a consequence of the urban temp-
erature modification therefore, atmospheric temperature stabil-
ity within a city is generally limited within the range of  neutral
to lapse conditions rather  than inversion to lapse, as found in
the  open.  Accordingly the transport of airborne material within
cities may  be expected to show  less variability than that in the
open.
      If the airborne material is composed of particulates, some
of the material may be lost by impaction on the large amount of
surface to which airborne  material  is exposed  in an urban area.
The magnitude of this loss can be estimated by use of experi-
mental data obtained in connection with laboratory studies on
particulate impaction.   An airborne particle approaching an ob-
struction may contact the obstructing surface  and presumably be
retained, if the particle  has sufficient momentum to cross the
streamlines formed around the  obstruction.  If its momentum is
not sufficient, the particle will  be carried by the air stream
around the  obstruction and there will be no impaction.   As  shown
by Johhstone and Roberts, ^ momentum considerations can be  used
to define a  dimensionless parameter, K, which in turn may be
directly related to particulate impaction efficiency.   Specifically,

                           K    1  d2up                   (1)
                                18   DM
where d   particle diameter
      P   particle density
      u   air speed relative to obstruction
      M - viscosity of air
      D = minimum crosswind  dimension of obstruction

      Theoretical and experimental particulate impaction data
reported by Ranz and Wong-'-'-' indicate that no impaction is ex-
pected for K values less than 0. 05.  For a nominal wind speed of
10 mph (500 cm/sec),  a particle diameter of 2 microns, and
density 1 gm/cc  equation (1) becomes
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
202                        PERKINS


                        v   6.16 x 10"3
                        K. - —
                                 D
      Therefore, in order that K exceed the limiting value of
0. 05, the value of D must be less than 0. 12 cm.  Obstructing
surfaces having a minimum dimension greater than this value
will not be effective collectors by the impaction process in
moderate winds unless the particles are substantially larger than
2 microns.   Thus buildings and other structures will not be ex-
pected to collect a significant amount of particulate airborne
material.
      Although losses might be expected on small surfaces such
as wires and foliage,  two factors tend to minimize the over-all
loss on such surfaces in city-wide transport.  First,  if the foliage
is dense enough to cause significant removal by impaction, the
wind speed and likewise the impaction efficiency will be reduced.
Second,  if the wind  speed is high, mechanical turbulence will dis-
tribute the airborne material aloft and a smaller percentage of
the total will be in lower layers and in contact with obstructing
surfaces.
      At the  outset of this discussion I indicated that quantitative
data on the transport  of material over cities are not now avail-
able but I must make  one exception.  Neiberger conducted five
daytime experiments  in Los Angeles using a particulate fluor-
escent tracer •"• 1 to investigate the reliability of trajectory  analy-
sis from available meteorological data.

      In trial 5 all of  the tracer material was carried across the
single sampling arc,  and further, the arc was wide enough to
bound the airborne tracer on each side.  Therefore the results
from this trial can be used for a  quantitative comparison between
the amount of material released and the amount found at the
sampling position.

      Briefly,  the trial was conducted as follows.  A total of
2400 grams of fluorescent tracer was released between 5  and 6
a.m. from a point source at  Compton Airport, as shown in
Figure 2.  Prom appropriate calibration data, it was  known that
each gram of tracer contained  5. 5 x Id*" fluorescent  particles,
hence the total number of particles released was 1.3 x 10^. A
total of 23 samplers were located along an arc approximately 13
miles from the source.  Air samples were  collected on membrane
filters.  Any fluorescent particles present in the air sample were
retained on the filter  surfaces and were readily identified and
counted under ultraviolet light.  Filters were changed at hourly
intervals to determine the time of tracer arrival and the time re-
quired for the tracer to  pass the  sampling arc.


                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT  A62-5

-------
SOME EFFECTS  OF CITY STRUCTURE
                                                                       203
             ARRIVAL TIME
   From surface trajectory
   From 500ft trajectory
   Observed
_I300-I400 hours
_0900-IOOO hours
_ 1000 hours
                                                                   10
  21 Sept. 1954
Figure 2. Results of fluorescent particle tracer test No. 5 conducted by Neiberger in the
        Los Angeles Basin.  Tracer was released at Compton Airport; samplers were
        located on an arc approximately 13 miles distant from the source. Positive
        counts were obtained at stations 16 through 23; each circle at these stations
        represents one  power of ten in particle count.  Numbers to right of stations
        show hours when tracer particles were collected.  Surface wind trajectories by
        several analysts  are included together with one 500-foot level trajectory. (Air
        Pollution Foundation Report No. 7)

       During the first 3 hours after the release, winds were
light and variable.   The tracer moved an estimated three miles
in a southeasterly  direction then later in the morning reversed
its direction.   Subsequently,  the wind  speed increased  and the
tracer moved steadily across the center  of the sampling arc at
6 mph.  The total  number of particles collected at each station
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER

-------
204                        PERKINS

is  given below; in Figure 2 each ring around the station repre-
sents particle numbers collected in powers of 10.  Sampling rate
was  8. 75 liters/minute at station 23 and 7. 5 liters/minute at all
other stations.
 Sampling           Total           Sampling           Total
Station No.      Particle Count     Station No.      Particle Count

     15                 0              20               864
     16                60              21               346
     17              1963              22                98
     18              3352              23                42
     19              1541              24                 0

      Before the tracer reached the sampling arc,  surface heat-
ing created unstable conditions from the ground to  1000 feet. A
strong inversion at the 1000-foot level effectively stopped further
mixing above  this height.  Under these conditions it is  reasonable
to assume  that mixing was sufficient below the inversion to pro-
duce a uniform vertical distribution of the tracer between'the
surface and 1000 feet.   Thus the amount of tracer recovered at
ground level can be  used to compute the total amount of tracer
passing through a vertical plane extending from the sampling arc
to a height of 1000 feet.  On the basis of this assumption the total
number of particles crossing the sampling arc from the ground
to the  inversion layer is 1. 1 x 10^4.  The expected value based
on the total number  of particles released  is 1. 3 x 10  .  In view
of uncertainties in determining source strength,  inversion height,
and  wind speed through  the unstable layer, these two values are in
excellent agreement.  These results suggest that the proposed
transport mechanism is reasonably  correct and that there was no
significant loss  of particles in the  course of 5 hours of travel over
the city of Los Angeles.

      Obviously, more information is needed before results such
as these,  obtained in one trial,  can be generalized.  If observa-
tions indicate that marked atmospheric stability in the  lower lay-
er over a city is normally absent,  however,  then vertical mixing
of airborne material can be expected both day and night.  In this
sense  the presence of a city tends  to simplify rather than com-
plicate the problem  of estimating behavior of airborne  material
in its movement over urban areas.
                        REFERENCES
1.   Howard,  Luke:  Climate of London deduced from meteor-
      ological observations.  3rd Ed. London, Harvey and Barton,
      1833.

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SOME EFFECTS OF CITY STRUCTURE                      205

2.  Renou,  E. :   "Differences de temperature entre Paris et
     Choisyle-Roi.  ' Societe Meteorologique de France,
     Annuaire,  10:  105-109, 1862.
3.  Hammon, W. H., and Duenchel, F.  W. :  "Abstract of a
     comparison of the minimum temperatures recorded at the
     U.  S.  Weather Bureau and the Forest Park Meteorological
     Observatories,  St. Louis, Missouri,  for the year 1891. "
     Monthly Weather Review,  30(1): 11-12, Jan.  1902.
4.  Schmidt,  Wilhelm:  "Die Verteilung der Minimumtempera-
     turen in der Frostnacht des  12 Mai 1927 im Gemeindegebiet
     von Wien.  " (Distribution of  minimum temperatures during
     the frost night of May 12,  1927  within the communal limits
     of Vienna. ) Fortschritte der Landwirtschaft,  2(21): 681-
     686,  1929.
5.  Sundborg, A. : "Local climatological studies of the tempera-
     ture conditions in an urban area, " Tellus,  2(3): 221-231,
      1950.
6.  Balchin,  W.  G.  V. , and Pye,  N. :  "A micro-climatological
     investigation of Bath and the surrounding district. "
      Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society,  73:  297-
      323,  1947.
7.  Duckworth,   F. S., and Sandberg, J.  S. :  "The Effect of
      Cities upon Horizontal and Vertical Temperature Gradients,
      Bulletin American Meteorological  Society,  35:  198-207,
      1954.
8.  DeMarrais,  G.  A. :  "Vertical Temperature Difference  Ob-
      served over an Urban Area,  " Bulletin American  Meteor-
      ological Society, 42:  548-556,  1961.
9.  Johnstone, H. F.,  and Roberts,  M.  H. :  "Deposition of
     Aerosol Particles from Moving Gas Streams, "^Industrial
     and Engineering Chemistry,  _4Jj 2417-2420,  1949.
10.  Ranz, W. E., and Wong, J.  B. :  "impaction of Dust and
     Smoke Particles on Surface  and Body Collectors,
     Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 44:  1371-1381,
      1952.
11.  Neiburger,  M. :  "Tracer Tests of Trajectories Computed
     from Observed Winds",  Report No. 7,  Air Pollution
     Foundation, Los Angeles,  California,  1955.
                        DISCUSSION

      MR.  YOSHIDA:  You mentioned that there were no losses
 by impaction on buildings.  Have you made  any estimate of the
 amount of tracers you may lose as a result of a diffusion pro-
 cess ?

 SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
206                       PERKINS

      PROFESSOR PERKINS:  Yes, we have made a fairly crude
attempt at this and this loss  appears to be extremely small.
Much less than that by impaction.
      DR. LANDSBERG:  Professor Perkins,  I have a question
with respect to your d over D factor.  That can be valid only at
a certain  limiting windspeed.
      PROFESSOR PERKINS:  You are exactly right.  My point
in presenting this was to depict a certain condition at 10 miles
an hour.  Of course,  as windspeed goes up,  the  D value would
also go up in proportion.  At 100 miles an hour the correspond-
ing value  of D would be at  12 centimeters, but at 100 miles an
hour one is  not much interested  in impaction.

      MR. HOLZWORTH:  We have seen the slides that were
produced  by Duckworth several times here,  and you have  men-
tioned that there were certain conditions under which one  would
get these  temperature patterns,  the heat islands.  With respect
to San Francisco, that area  being rather windy and cloudy, we
should point out that these pictures probably are not too repre-
sentative  of conditions that occur there often.  Is that correct?
      PROFESSOR PERKINS:  Yes, in the sense that the
measurements were made not necessarily to determine whether
these were  characteristic  of San Francisco over, say, an appre-
ciable period  of time.  They are characteristic of a large city,
providing you have the clear conditions and low windspeed.

      MR. HOLZWORTH:  These were,  indeed,  rather special-
ized occasions in San Francisco, wouldn't you say?
      PROFESSOR PERKINS:  I  don't represent  the San Fran-
cisco Chamber of Commerce but we don't have clouds all  the
time.  Of course, the stratus  is a very common phenomenon
during summer,  but much less so in spring and  fall.
      DR. HEWSON:  I would like to ask  what  might be the time
variation  of this  rather uniform  distribution of turbulence for a
city.  For example, don't  we begin to get some stabilization,
say, towards  dawn?

      PROFESSOR PERKINS:  The temperature  differences
maintain their identity throughout the night; in San Francisco there
is a difference all night long.  In a small community, Palo Alto,
the difference is less.  So again it is a function of city size.

      FROM THE AUDIENCE:  In view of the comments about
impaction and d over D, and comments about the effectivity and
desirability of parks  in metropolitan areas,  would you care to
comment  on the effectiveness  of parks in helping pollution
problems ?

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
SOME EFFECTS OF CITY STRUCTURE                      207

     PROFESSOR PERKINS:  Well, my comments will be rather
qualitative.  If one intends to remove particles by impaction,  it
will have to be by foliage, since it takes small surfaces to do it.
If the foliage is dense enough to make appreciable reduction in the
concentration of material in an area of 1 or 2 kilometers,  then
the windspeed simply couldn't be maintained.  "In  other words,  if
you have a high density of foliage, you lose your windspeed,  and
therefore the impaction efficiency drops because it varies in pro-
portion to the windspeed.

     We have  some  reservations as to the possibility of remov-
ing particles effectively by this mechanism.   One other consider-
ation is  that you remove  only the material that passes through
this lower layer.  If  the material is also distributed substantially
above the lower layer then,  of course,  the percentage lost by im-
paction is going to be reduced.
     MR. KALSTROM:  In the studies  in San Francisco and  San
Jose was there any attempt to differentiate natural differences
from the effects of the city?  In other words,  were all of the ob-
served effects  due to the' city or were part of  them due to condi-
tions that were there previously?  I don't know how much building
has gone on in  San Francisco since 1952,  but  in both San Jose and
Palo Alto there has been considerable  building and enlargement
of the city since that time.  Would a new study show the same
pattern or would it show  the effects of the  more recent building?

     PROFESSOR PERKINS:  San Jose, I am sure,  would show
a new pattern.   There isn't the slightest doubt about it.   And this
is by virtue of the fact that not only has it  expanded, but there
has been an appreciable density increase  in certain areas.  A re-
study of this area, I  think, would show the effects that you men-
tioned.
     Now,  I think your first point was  that you are trying to
separate the effect of the city from the  local climatology --

     MR. KALSTROM:  Pre-existing.
     PROFESSOR PERKINS:  Pre-existing climatology.  I think
San Jose might be a  good example to illustrate this point.  Were
San Jose completely  removed,  and the flat area undeveloped  or
agricultural as it  was in  the past,  I am sure you wouldn't find the
kind of temperature discontinuity now observed in that area.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                   Source Configurations and Atmospheric
                                   Dispersion in Mathematical Models of Urban
                                   Pollution Distributions

                                   GLENN R. HILST, The Travelers Research
                                   Center, Inc. Hartford, Connecticut
 Summary
     The bivariant normal distribution of airborne materials emitted continuously from
 individual point (small-area) sources is utilized as the basic mathematical model for at-
 mospheric dispersion.  The mathematical form of the variance terms .in this model, as a
 function of travel distance or time, is reviewed. The integral form of these basic equa-
 tions for multiple sources is then derived  and examined for tractability under various
 source-distribution and dispersion conditions.  Simplified conditions are utilized to  ob-
 tain distributions of air pollutants for steady-source and meteorological conditions and
 these  are presented to  show the effects of concentrated versus widely dispersed sources.
 The more general utility of the model in studying various  source configurations under a
 variety of  meteorological conditions and the restrictions that must be imposed for real
 sources and atmospheres are reviewed.
      The problem of urban air pollution and its impact on the
comfort,  safety,  health, and economic status of communities of
people are, paradoxically  enough,  becoming better defined and
more complex at the same  time.  Better defined as we discover
the underlying biological,  physical,  and chemical  processes at
work; more complex as we recognize the multivariate nature of
the problem and the sometimes subtle, sometimes bold interac-
tions of the atmosphere, sunlight,  multiple pollutants,  and the  dis-
tribution of sources of pollutants in establishing the patterns of
exposure  in the urban environment.  A pollution problem exists
only if there is a material or combination of materials that ad-
versely affect at least one segment of  a population; the effects are
in themselves frequently difficult to define.
      The work of many people in the many facets of air pollution
has shown conclusively  that the knowledge  and understanding we
require to cope with this problem, whether in urban planning or
pollution control,  must  be derived as a consistent synthesis of  the
processes of  pollution generation and emission,  atmospheric
transport and diffusion, and interactions between the pollutants
and the receptors.   It is the purpose of this paper to present a
method for synthesizing the first two of these, source variables
and atmospheric variables,  by way of  a mathematical model and
in the context of the urban pollution problem.   This  model is re-
stricted to steady-state meteorological and source conditions and
predicts average concentrations.

                                 209

-------
210                          HILST

THE MODEL
      Consider a Cartesian coordinate system with an arbitrary
origin but fixed in the earth,  with the  x  axis oriented along the
direction of the mean wind, the  y axis oriented horizontally cross-
wind,  and the z axis oriented along the  vertical.  At a point
(Ł, -1}, 3 ) we place a continuous,  steady point source of strength
Q( Ł ,  1  .5 )-   The average  concentration of the  material emanat-
ing from this source when  it reaches the point (x,  y,  z) is
X(x-Ł, y-ij,  z-4).  We wish to  specify X (x, y,  z|Ł , r\, \ ) in
terms of  Q( i-,  1, .J),  (x-?, y-1, z-.$ ) and the parameters that
characterize  the dispersive capacity of the atmosphere.  For this
purpose we shall assume that the distribution of X in the (y,  z)
plane is bi-variant normal.  Then
 X(x, y, zlf,  , , j  )        '  "' "*  }  exp
           1                 z 
-------
MODELS OF POLLUTION DISTRIBUTIONS                   211

SOLUTION OF THE MODEL

     Solution of equation (1) and integration of equation (2) re-
quires the specification of o-y2 (x   Ł  ) and 
-------
212
                              HILST
   \
    \
    \  Line Source
     \
     \
      \
       \
        \
          V
       X\
              \
           P| =
Fi n ite Area
  Source
                       Continuous Area
                          Source
  0
Figure 1. Maximum concentrations as a function of downwind distance from a line source,
        a banded source of width w, and a uniform source distribution, all of infinite
        crosswind extent.
      Another criterion that may be established is, "What source
distribution gives the  minimum total dosage over some area of
interest?"  In the present steady-state model comparative dosages
can be obtained by integrating equation (2) over the area of interest.
With the infinite crosswind source distributions assumed for our
exemplary  models,  the  integration is over a downwind distance
X from the line source or the upwind edge of the area sources.
Then
                                X
                       D:
                                    X (x)
                                      (4)
where Xr (x) is the distribution of concentration in the plane of the
maximum (the plane of the sources), D is the dosage per unit time,
and the subscript  i specifies the source configuration (i - J for
line  source, i    w for banded source,  i     c for uniformly dis-
tributed source).
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MODELS OF POLLUTION DISTRIBUTIONS                   213

     Solution of equation (4) for these source configurations
yields

                        2-P

                      X  2
                  F u AzX'(2-p)
      W-A     w V2Ą u Az#(2-p)(4-p)


                          2-P
                    4Q/i X  2
     Dc,X
                                       X
4-p"|
 2J
                2IT u Az/>(2-p)(4-p)



Forming ratios of these dosages,  we have

             D/,X     4-p
                                               (a)
             DC,X      2

                                               (b)         (6)
             DW,X      2    DW)x              ,  >
             ~T^	    ~A	  T^	              \("'
             D/ , X     4-p  DC , X

Equations (6) are of particular interest since we wish to know the
comparative dosages.  Equations (6a) and (6b) are shown graph-
ically for three values of p in Figure 2,  where the total dosages
from a line source  and banded sources of varying downwind widths
w are compared with the total dosage from a uniformly distributed
source covering the entire distance of interest, X.
    Inspection of  Figure 2 shows that the maximum  total dosage
is associated with the line source and this dosage is 10 to 15 per-
cent higher than the uniform source  case.  The total dosage from
the banded source area is intermediate between the line and uni-
form sources and tends to the latter as the fraction of the distance
of interest occupied by the banded source increases (w/X  •— 1. 0. )
    If one can ignore for the moment all other requirements that
must be met in planning the distribution of sources of atmospheric
Pollutants in urban  areas, the ramifications  of Figures 1 and 2 are

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR  OVER CITIES

-------
214
                              HILST
        1.20
  pe  o
 Q IP
        1.02
        1.00
                                                            0.9  1.0
                                       w
                                       X
 Figure 2. The effect of downwind source width, w, on total dosage in the plane of max-
         imum concentration and over a distance of interest X, for three values of the
         diffusion coefficient, p. (w = 0 represents the case of a line source.) (See text
         for explanation of ratio Dw \/Dc )(.)
almost self-evident.   One can minimize, or at least largely con-
strain, maximum concentrations and can minimize  absolutely
dosages over an area of interest by distributing the sources of air
pollutants as uniformly as possible over that area.  The reduction
in total dosage by this device is not large,  according to this model,
but again the value of a 10 to 15 percent reduction in the general
exposure of the area or population to air pollutants  must be weighed
separately.

      Some  generality can be introduced in the source  distributions
assumed above.  The more  practical problems of urban air pollu-
tion do require the recognition of constraints  set by aesthetics,
                                 SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MODELS OF POLLUTION DISTRIBUTIONS
215
land utilization,  transportation,  power and water supplies, top-
ography,  and the like.  These source distributions are unique to
the locality for which they are derived and must be considered
individually,  a procedure for which the models developed here
are equally useful.
     We can consider one further problem that is of real interest
in city planning.   The question may be phrased, "Of what value
are 'green-belts' (non-source areas)  in the context of air pollu-
tion?"  An initial solution to this problem may be obtained by solv-
ing the  model for an arbitrary arrangement of banded source
strips.   An example of such a solution is shown in Figure 3,  where
three source  bands are  arranged,  as  shown by the shaded strips,
                            Distance Downwind (km)
Figure 3. Comparison of maximum concentrations as a (unction of distance downwind from
       three arbitrarily arranged banded source areas and the same total source strength
       distributed uniformly over a distance of 20 km. All source configurations are of
       infinite crosswind extent.


at 0 « x < 3  km,  7  ^ x <  9  km and  11  $ x 3 16 km.   The resultant
concentration distribution is shown by the solid line in the graph;
for comparison,  the concentration distribution that obtains for a
uniformly distributed source configuration is shown as the  dashed
line (total source strength is conserved in this comparison).

     The comparative excess of concentration (and dosage) in the
compressed  source strips and the  deficit  of these quantities in the
"green-belts" are obvious from the diagram.  Concentrations for
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
216                         HILST

these two cases are converging with increasing distance,  i. e. , at
large distances the concentrations  and dosages become insensi-
tive to the banded source arrangement.
CONCLUSIONS
      The power of mathematical models to cope with the joint
effects of source distributions and atmospheric dispersion prop-
erties in determining air pollution distributions has been illustrated.
The ability of these models to handle much more complex systems
of sources and meteorological variability is  clearly recognized and
requires only the judicious use of available high-speed electronic
computer equipment.

      A limitation must be recognized, however.  These models
are no more  accurate and complete  than the  mathematical repre-
sentations of the physical processes that they incorporate.  In the
present instance the lack of a thorough knowledge of the vertical
exchange  capacity of the atmosphere over a rough urban surface
and the failure to incorporate loss of pollutants by deposition are
most  serious  areas of ignorance.  These must be overcome by
continued research; in the meantime we have the mechanism, in
these models, to synthesize what we do know in a useful way.
Perhaps  more importantly, we can use these models as guides to
the design of the highly complex experimental programs required
to further our knowledge  in this important problem area.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                  Some Aspects of Atmospheric Diffusion
                                  in Urban Areas

                                  JAMES HALITSKY, Research Scientist,
                                  New York University
Summary
    The waffle-type topography of a large city creates two general airflow regimes: a
channel (low through streets and among buildings, and an upper airflow. Three types of
discharge of pollutants over cities (ground-level, roof-level, and tall-stack discharge) are
considered in terms of diffusion by the two airflow regimes. Ground-level discharge is in
channel flow, which is principally an aerodynamic phenomenon.  Wind-tunnel studies of
concentration patterns would be very useful for this source.  Roof-level discharge is in a
transition regime. A full-scale study would require saturation of an area with sampling
equipment for the short duration of a constant wind. A program to develop  simulation of
turbulence in wind tunnels would prove helpful for studies of roof-level discharge.  Tall-
stack discharge is in free atmospheric flow, with turbulence generated by ground rough-
ness and by heat from building surfaces.  A full-scale study would be required to deter-
mine diffusion coefficients  over a city.
      Gas concentrations in an urban atmosphere may vary over
several orders  of magnitude.   For example, the concentration of
SO  within the chimney of a coal-  or oil-fired  heating plant may
be of the order  of 1CF  ppm,  while  day-to-day samples taken at
street level may be of the order of 10~1 ppm or less.  In a given
atmospheric condition, an observer moving among such sources
would not normally experience the highest concentrations.  Human
beings,  animals,  plants,  and  mechanical  equipment sensitive  to
corrosion would be speedily removed from an  environment con-
taining 10  ppm.  SC>2 concentrations of the order of ICr ppm  are
found quite frequently  on  roof tops,  however,  and  concentrations
of 10  ppm may be found  in upper-story apartments when the wind
is in the  right (or wrong) direction.   At a distance from a  given
chimney  great enough  that the contribution of that  chimney to the
concentration level is  negligible,  the observer  experiences low
concentrations of the  order of 10    ppm.   These concentrations
do not vary rapidly with location.  They are caused  by the in-
tegrated  effect of all sources  in the  area.
     Between the recognizable regions of high local concentra-
tion and low diffuse concentration, there exists a poorly defined
region of intermediate concentrations.   This is the ordinary en-
vironment of the urban dweller.  It is a three-dimensional space
in Which the concentrations fluctuate in time,  and  through  which
the observer moves during his daily routine.   Our understanding
of diffusion and  our knowledge of pollutant distribution within this

                                 217

-------
218                        HALITSKY

intermediate region is practically nil.
      A research program designed to evaluate air pollution over
cities should take into account the characteristics of these three
regions,  and methods  of observation and analysis should be suit-
able to each region.

ANALYTICAL METHODS
      In the  mathematical treatment of atmospheric diffusion a
real situation is customarily idealized into a simple mathematical
model.  A tall chimney may be represented by a  continuous point
source.  A multitude  of small  chimneys dispersed over  a large
area  may be represented by a  continuous area source.   When
these idealizations are made,  it  is implied, but not always
stated, that  the derived formulas for ground concentration are
valid only beyond a loosely defined distance at which emission ir-
regularities cease to  influence the  concentration  distribution in
the plume.
      For the isolated chimney the irregularity may appear as an
initial plume expansion,  which becomes insignificant in  comparison
with subsequent diffusion after a short travel distance.   Since the
plume rarely reaches  a receptor on the ground in this distance,
the foregoing limitation is  not  a handicap.  In a multiple-chimney
problem  the area-source solution will be valid beyond some dis-
tance from the  edge of the  area.  When the principal receptors are
among the chimneys within the area, the area-source solution is
not adequate.
      In a region of multiple sources the technique of distributing
the total  effluent uniformly over  the total area must lead to an
underestimate of the maximum concentration experienced by a re-
ceptor  moving within  the area.  Diffusion theory  generally predicts
that all sources upwind of a point will contribute  to the concentra-
tion at that point.  Maximum contributions  will come from sources
directly upwind.  The  contributions from sources displaced later-
ally from the upwind axis decrease  exponentially with lateral
distance.  Practically, the entire contribution will be made by
sources lying within a wedge having its apex at the receptor and
its body symetrically disposed about the  upwind axis.  In the
mathematical process of transforming the  multiple sources into an
area  source, some of the contaminant  is removed from  this wedge
and distributed over the  area outside the wedge.  The removed
portion makes no contribution  to the concentration at the receptor;
this results  in a lower estimate of the  integrated effect than  would
be obtained if the sources within the wedge were  not distributed.
Moreover,  a receptor immediately  downwind of a stack  would
                                 SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-51

-------
ASPECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION                    219

receive very high peak concentrations.

     To overcome this defect one might replace the continuous
area source by small area sources of high concentration at the
actual chimney locations.  Concentrations in the plumes for each
chimney might be calculated, and the total concentration at any
point would be derived by a numerical summation of concentrations
from all sources.   This approach would be quite feasible if the
physical reality consisted of isolated chimneys rising from level
ground of low uniform roughness.  In such a case,  the mean wind
speed and direction and diffusion coefficients could be postulated.

     In a city, however,  most chimneys  do not extend more than
a few feet above the roofs of the buildings they serve, and other
sources such as automobile exhausts move about on the ground.
The mean wind high above the city need bear no simple relation-
ship in speed or direction to the wind at roof or street level.
Diffusion coefficients at roof and street level are simply not
known. Thus, it is unlikely that a purely analytical approach  will
prove effective within  a city.   Experimental data are needed to
give clues to diffusion rates in circumstances where the principal
factor is the  influence of local topography.

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

     How shall such experiments  be conducted?  Evidently we
must consider source  location, receptor location, building
shape, wind speed, wind direction, and thermal gradients.  It is
a huge task to instrument one full-size building to cover all pos-
sible receptor locations and to conduct such a test during the
short time period during which atmospheric conditions remain
constant.  Moreover,  we  must consider whether the information
obtained in this one test is valuable enough to justify the expense.
Generally, such considerations militate against the experiment.

     The alternatives to  a full-scale field test are  spot checks
at a given installation  or comprehensive tests on  a scale model.
Recent model tests at  New York University found that spot  checks
are often misleading because neither the instantaneous nor the
mean plumes from  a source close  to a building can be predicted
with certainty.   One cannot tell whether the spot measurement is
a maximum  or not.  Under controlled wind-tunnel conditions,  ex-
haustive  studies of concentration distributions can be made at
reasonable cost.  Such intensive studies have been performed re-
cently with a model of the  Clinical Center of the National Institutes
of Health at  Bethesda.  1» 2
     Figures 1  and 2  are  representative of the smoke pattern
photographs made  during tests of smoke patterns around single


SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
CO
W
O

H
M
n
a
^
i—i
n
>
r

SJ
w
^
o
               «ind
centerplane section elevation
roof plan
                                                                                             rear face elevation
                    Figure 1.  Smoke Concentrations  Around a Cube 0° Orientation
                                                                                                                                        r

                                                                                                                                        H
                                                                                                                                        •s.
                                                                                                                                        7,

-------
                                                                                                                                                                 r.
                                                                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                                                                                 H
                                                                                                                                                                 -f.
K
•X
r;

H
              wind

                                                                                                                                                                 c
                                                                                                                                                                 C/;

                                                                                                                                                                 C
                                                                                                                                                                 x
                                      roof plan
                                                                       centerplane section elevation
                                                                                                                               elevation
                                                Figure 2.  Smoke Concentrations Around a Cube 45° Orientation

-------
222                       HALITSKY

block shapes. 3  They indicate that the  maximum concentrations
may occur in unexpected locations.  For example Figure 1 shows
that when a building is  oriented with one face normal to the wind,
the emission from a  flush roof exhaust will produce maximum
roof surface concentrations upwind of  the exhaust opening.  This
condition does not obtain in a corner orientation,  as shown in
Figure  2.

AN URBAN AREA DIFFUSION RESEARCH PROGRAM

      In evaluation of pollution over and within an urban area,
some generalizations of source distribution are needed to es-
tablish  typical pollution patterns.  Three  major source groupings
can be established.   The first contains the very tall chimneys
found on power plants,  refineries,  and municipal incinerators.
The second contains  the numerous heating plant and incinerator
exhausts at roof level of the older five- and six-story buildings
that fill our city blocks.  The third group contains the automo-
tive exhausts at  street  level.

      None of these source groupings are amenable to strict
analytical treatment.   The tall stacks may be considered as
elevated continuous point sources,  but there is a dearth of in-
formation regarding diffusion coefficients  over urban areas.
The roof-top emissions may be treated as rectangular area
sources separated by clear bands formed by streets and avenues,
but it is difficult to predict how rapidly the gases will penetrate
downward between buildings.  Diffusion from ground-level sources
is greatly affected by the channeling  of air currents between
buildings and the back  flow in eddies created  by building corners;
analytical methods are completely inadequate for this type of
source.

      Since it is generally desirable to use analytical methods
where possible,  experiments should be performed to determine
diffusion coefficients and mean wind profiles  at various eleva-
tions above roof level.   These quantities should be measured at
full-scale in the atmosphere.  Although the controlled environ-
ment of the wind tunnel makes testing easier, the modeling of
atmospheric turbulence in the wind tunnel has not been developed
sufficiently to give reliable results, especially where thermal
gradients are involved.  There is a possibility that wind tunnel
models may be  used to determine diffusion coefficients near roof
level under neutral conditions and high wind speeds,  since the
mechanical turbulence  in this region should be much greater than
thermal turbulence.  Until the scaling of turbulence spectra has
been more  fully  explored, however, this approach can not be
recommended.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5,

-------
ASPECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION                    223

     Once the diffusion coefficients above the city have been
determined,  the analysis of tall stack sources may proceed.  If
the coefficients are found to vary considerably with height,  it may
be necessary to refine the diffusion formulas to permit arbitrary
variation of wind speed and diffusion  coefficient.  Numerical
methods may be useful to give approximate but practical solu-
tions.  One open question is the elevation of the effective ground.
Since ground concentrations theoretically vary inversely as the
square of the source height, the assumed ground elevation is im-
portant. Perhaps the source height ought to be measured from the
ZQ of the large-scale wind profile over the city.

     The rooftop area source poses an interesting analytical
problem, since part of the pollutant will diffuse upward and part
downward into  the space between buildings.  This aspect is beyond
my competence and I leave it as a challenge  to the analysts.  Roof-
top diffusion downward into city streets can easily be measured in
model tests, however.  A representative section of the city contain-
ing several typical repetitive block arrangements can be tested for
area emission  or  multiple-point-source  emissions on a given
roof.  Three-dimensional concentration gradients within the
street channels can be measured as far downwind as is  necessary
for the concentrations to reduce to negligible values.  A numerical
addition of displaced concentration patterns will give the in-
tegrated effect of  emissions on all buildings.

     The diffusion  of pollutants from street-level sources should
be studied  with models to determine  the three-dimensional diffu-
sion pattern.  Visual smoke studies to determine the region of
highest concentration,  followed by quantitative concentration
measurements in  this region offer assurance that the maximum
concentrations will be detected. Model concentrations can be
represented as non-dimensional coefficients, which may then be
used with full-size values  of wind speed, source strength,  and
building size to obtain full-size concentrations. ^

     The validity of model testing of diffusion around buildings
has not been established as yet by  direct comparison of full-scale
and model experiments in a variety of turbulence  conditions.
There is theoretical support and some experimental evidence to
indicate that the procedure is valid for neutral atmospheres and
higher winds.  Tests of gas bomb releases in a mock-up of a
full-scale village and a model  of the  village in a wind tunnel have
shown good correlation. 4' 5  Funds  have been requested from
NIH  for comparative tests to establish with greater refinement
the degree  of discrepancy between model and full-scale tests in
the case of diffusion around a simple  block-shaped building,  and,
if such discrepancies are found to be  large,  to develop analytical


SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
224                        HALITSKY
or experimental techniques to improve correspondence.*

      The three-mode source arrangement suggested in the previ-
ous paragraphs is,  of course,  an approximation.  Even if all the
analytical and experimental procedures that were discussed should
prove effective,  there is no assurance that the combined picture
would correspond to reality.  Some experimental evidence must be
found against which the predictions  can be weighed.  There is no
substitute for full-scale field sampling for this purpose.

      A study just beginning in New York City may provide  the
type of information required.  The New York City Health Research
Council has given a research grant  to Cornell University to cor-
relate weather and pollution variables with the incidence of pul-
monary ailments in a normally healthy population.   The portion of
the program concerned with weather and pollution documentation
has been subcontracted to New York University under the direction
of Dr. Wm. T. Ingram.  I am involved in setting up the weather
and sampling stations.  The medical and statistical  analyses  will
be handled by Cornell.

      We intend to record continuously the concentrations of a
number of atmospheric pollutants at four levels of a 200-foot-high
building that stands fairly isolated in a more or less uniform area
of 5-story tenements.  In addition to the contaminants, we will
measure the wind  speed at the roof,  the variation of temperature
with height, solar radiation,  rainfall,  mean temperature,  and
pressure.   We also intend to measure  simultaneously,  under
selected test conditions,  the horizontal variation of  specific pollu-
tants.  To  supplement our own measurements, the records of the
various weather stations  at municipal airports and stations of the
New York  City Department of Air Pollution Control  will be  used.

      It is  hoped that the  data collected in this  manner can be inte-
grated into a space-time  picture of the pollution distribution in  the
area under consideration, which measures about 1 by 5 miles and
is located  on the west shore of the East River in midtown Manhat-
tan.  This  information will then be analyzed in conjunction with
records of the activity of sample populations in the area and their
state of health.  Fortunately, this information will also be avail-
able for other studies,  such as those suggested in this paper.
*The NIH has awarded Mr. Halitsky a 3-year  research grant for
 this purpose,  effective June 1,  1962.

                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
ASPECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION                    225

                        REFERENCES

1.  Halitsky, James,  Diffusion of Vented Gas Around Buildings,
     APCA Journal,  v.  12,  no.  2,  February 1962.
2.  Halitsky, James and Jones, Herbert H., Wind Tunnel Tests
     of Exhaust Recirculation at the NIH Clinical Center,  Paper
     No.  65,  Amer.  Ind. Hyg. Conf. , Washington,  D. C. May
     16,  1962.  (To be published in AIHA Journal. )
3.  Halitsky, James and Golden,  Jack, Diffusion of Vented Gas
     Around Simple Boxes  (in preparation).
4.  Kalinske,  A. A.,  Jensen,  R. A. and Schadt,  C.  F.,  Wind
     Tunnel Studies of Gas Diffusion in a  Typical Japanese
     Urban District, NDRC Div. 10 Informal Kept.  No.  10. 3A-
     48,  June 1945.
5.  Kalinske,  A. A.,  Jensen,  R. A. and Schadt,  C.  F. ,  Correla-
     tion of Wind  Tunnel Studies with Measurements of Gas  Dif-
     fusion, NDRC Div.  10 Informal Rept. No.  10.3A-48a,
     September,  1945.
                        DISCUSSION

     FROM THE  FLOOR:  We frequently  run into the problem of
an adequate sampling population.  You  mentioned using Welfare
Department cases. Are we to assume  that everybody in  Manhat-
tan is on welfare ?
     MR.  HALITSKY:  The sample population was selected by
Cornell.   It consists principally  of Welfare Department cases,
who report weekly for their allowances and may thus be questioned
about their ailments.  Some volunteers not on welfare are included.
Our building choice was based on physical suitability and prox-
imity to the center of the  sample population.  The economic
status of the population will have to be  filtered out statistically.
     MR.  SMITH:  Do you have  any data at all  from the  Clinical
Center at  Bethesda to correlate with the concentration measure-
ments you made in the tunnel? This is the kind  of thing I think
would be most instructive.

     MR.  HALITSKY:  There are no field-correlation measure-
ments available.  I wish I could assure everybody that the tunnel
measurements can be converted  to field concentrations simply by
inserting the appropriate  known parameters into the scaling for-
mula.  In tests of this type, where flow disturbances are aero-
dynamic rather than thermal in origin, there are indications
that  diffusion is determined mostly  by turbulence induced by the
building rather than turbulence in the approaching air  stream.
The  request for research support from NIH is aimed at resolv-
ing this problem.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
226                       HALITSKY

      MR.  SMITH:  To finish my question,  I think you are right
that in such cases the  tunnel probably represents beautifully what
happens around a building.  But I think that many of us are a little
worried about the scale-factor problem,  about whether the model
representation is correct or not.
      MR.  HALITSKY: My tests were limited to regions very
close to the buildings because I,  too, am concerned with the in-
creasing influence of atmospheric turbulence as wake turbulence
decreases.  I don't think there is any information available on the
relative importance of atmospheric turbulence in the  presence  of
wake  turbulence.
      MR.  COLLINS:  For a good many years I worked with an
industrial concern that took advantage  of some of the  fine work
that Mr. Halitsky and his colleagues are doing at New York Uni-
versity.  I would like to tell a little story and then ask him a
question.

      We were consulted  on the design of a chemical  laboratory,
which had  stacks for many chemical exhausts on the roof.  The
question arose as to how  high these stacks should be  to prevent
the recirculation that Mr. Halitsky has demonstrated.  After
studying some of the shapes in the wind tunnel,  we decided that
if the stack were well above the  surface of separation there should
be no trouble.

      We passed our recommendations on to the design engineer
and the architect.  We didn't hear anything more about it until
about a year later.  The laboratory had been built at  that time,
and we got an emergency call that about twice a week they had  to
evacuate all the personnel,  250 people, because of recirculation
of H2S and other unpleasant fumes.

      We went out to look at the  laboratory, and this  is what had
happened.   True enough they put the stacks up to the  height of 30
feet above the roof as we had suggested.  But the architect didn't
like the looks of them. He built a penthouse around the stacks so
that the actual stack  was  about six inches above the roof of the
penthouse; furthermore,  the penthouse had a 2-foot papapet on it,
and all the fumes were trapped in this little well on the top of the
building and they just sort of oozed out into the air intake.

      My question is, how do you win an argument with an
architect ?

      MR. HALITSKY: Well, actually it is pretty tough.  In the
Bethesda work we tested  not only the original conditions, but some
suggestions that had  been made for alleviating the conditions.
There were severe restrictions  on what could be done with the
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
ASPECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION                   227

building, because aesthetically they are very proud of it.  I think
this is true  in many of the modern types  of construction.
     FROM THE AUDIENCE:  Your use of this simple model
for data reduction and inclusion of V in the determination of
scale factor seems to imply that there is a stationary wake form
with respect to wind velocity.  Is this in  fact so?
     MR.  HALITSKY:  This is so if you use the term quasi-
stationary instead of stationary to indicate a time mean rather
than an instantaneous wake form.  We have tested a number of
sharp-edged building models at different tunnel  wind speeds
varying from 1 to about 15 ft/sec. The values of K in the wake
do not vary with wind speed above a speed of about 3 ft/sec.   I
believe that this is due to the sharp edges of the building, which
prescribe the wake shape.  A rounded building shape  would have a
wake that is more sensitive to boundary layer formation,  which
in turn depends on Reynolds Number and therefore on wind speed.
     MR.  MOOK:  On the matter of scaling,  I think the same
phenomenon of exhaust recirculation occurs when the wake is
not generated by  a moving wind but by a moving building or car.

     MR.  HALITSKY:  Yes.  I have a station wagon with the
rear seat facing backward.  My children like to ride in the back
with the rear window open.  The exhaust recirculates into the
rear window,  and out through the butterfly in my left  front window.
It is not so  bad on a level road with the throttle  open, but when
going down  hill while braking,  I find the exhaust concentrations
up front intolerable.  As a general rule,  I do not permit the rear
window to be open more than 3 inches from the  top.
     FROM THE AUDIENCE: In your tests, to what height
above the building did you  have to go to measure the free wind
speed?

     MR.  HALITSKY:  The height varies with the distance down-
wind from the leading edge.  On the cube the height of the wake
at the downwind edge of the roof is about half the height of the
cube.  The  speed just outside of the wake is about 15  to 20%
higher than  the free wind  speed.

     FROM THE AUDIENCE:  In other words,   if we  were mak-
ing a measurement for air pollution purposes, we ought to get up
a distance of half the height of the building?
     MR.  HALITSKY:  It  depends on wind direction.   The wake
over the roof in a cornering wind is very small.  The wake in a
frontal wind is large.  To  be absolutely safe in all wind directions
you would have to get above the largest wake, and even then you
must take into account a certain degree of overspeed.  This

SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
228                        HALITSKY
figure of half the building height applies only to a cube.  I believe
a tall building of-small plan cross section would have a wake over
the roof no larger than that of a cube of side area equal to the plan
area of the building.
      MR.  GOLDSTON:  In reviewing the papers that have been
presented  here in the past day and a half,  I hope I leave here more
enlightened than confused.  I can see the immensity of the prob-
lems we face here,  and their complexity.  I think we are facing a
problem of greater  gravity than simply that  of time and space,
per  se.  I  just wonder whether,  at some time in the future,  we
would be able to take the mass  of material that we have con-
sidered  here,  the heat,  the various strata and layers of pollu-
tants,  the  precipitation  patterns in cities, the suburban tempera-
ture variations, and make them amenable to a simple statement
that we could use  as a guide to further our activities and studies.

      MR.  HALITSKY:  I think that other members  of the
Symposium would be better qualified  to answer that question.

      DR.  HILST:   Throughout what we have been talking about
this morning there  seems to run a theme not stated, and I hope it
is not assumed, that there are unique solutions to the problem
which we face.  I would like to disabuse anybody with that idea.
We recognize that we are working with highly variable fluid
quantities  here.  They vary with time and with space.  We recog-
nize that,  from a statistical point  of view, if we are going to de-
fine over a large amount of time,  we have to take a large  sample.
But  we also recognize that the atmosphere itself is  guilty of taking
small samples.  It  has a large degree of freedom within which to
work and because of inhomogeneity and the rapid changes  in the
wind and temperature, the atmosphere itself gets only a small
chance to act in the specific circumstances we prescribe.  There
is no solution; we can only describe the distribution of possible
solutions.

      CHAIRMAN NEIBERGER: I think that we can all see that
there are various approaches to this  problem of dispersion in the
atmosphere.  The approach of the statistical turbulence measure-
ments,  the approach of the continuous diffusion concept,  and the
approach of the model experiments; the use  of computers  both
analog and digital give some hope  of solving the complex problems.

-------
Session 3: Present and Future Needs for Meteorological
        and Air Quality Observations
J. J. SCHUENEMAN,* Chairman
                                 Trie Relative Importance of Some
                                 Meteorological Factors in Urban Air Pollution

                                 ELMER ROBINSON, Stanford Research
                                 Institute
Summary
    Wind patterns and inversion or stability conditions are important meteorological
factors affecting urban air pollution.  Popular attention  is usually focused on inversion,
even though wind conditions can be shown to be more significant in many situations. The
relative importance of winds and inversions is examined in terms of theoretical, statis-
tical, and climatological considerations.

     This .discussion is not a  technical paper in the usual sense,
since it puts forth a particular point of view of the author and does
not include the examples of contrary fact or opinion that would  be
necessary in a technical paper.  Neither  does the discussion in-
clude a comprehensive presentation of available  research  studies.
This type of presentation was  specifically designed to take advan-
tage of the program chairman's  remark that  "controversial  topics
should  not be  avoided. "  The author hopes that this approach will
lead to a more careful appraisal of urban diffusion meteorology.
     Not long ago an eastern  city experienced a period of partic-
ularly  severe  air pollution.   When a newspaper reporter asked
the cause,  he  was told that the pollution was due  to a temperature
inversion affecting the area.  On the West Coast  it sometimes
seems  that everyone believes that if there were no inversion over
Los Angeles there would be  no smog in that afflicted area.

     Although public recognition of the smog-producing effect  of
a temperature inversion seems quite remarkable,  careful con-
sideration indicates a rather poor public  understanding of urban
air pollution meteorology.  The  most unfortunate aspect of this
situation is  that professional meteorologists are  doubtlessly to
blame for this state of affairs.   The inversion is often given spec-
ial treatment  and emphasis,  and the rest of the meteorology is all
too often glossed over or not mentioned at all.  With respect to
meteorological air pollution factors,  it would appear that a much
better case  can  be made for a  weak wind  pattern than for a low
inversion.  In the following discussion the relative importance  of
these two  parameters, inversion and wind, will be considered in
some urban air  pollution situations.   The impact on air pollution
meteorology of "inversionless" thinking will be examined, and  a
more rational approach to an explanation of city-wide air pollu-
tion will be outlined.
* Chief, Technical Assistance Branch, Division of Air Pollution,
 U. S. Public Health Service.
                                229

-------
230                       ROBINSON

AREA-WIDE CALCULATIONS
      An exercise undertaken at some time by almost everyone in
air pollution is the calculation of a typical volume of air available
for the dilution of an area's daily emission of pollution.  Table 1
shows the results of such calculations for the San Francisco Bay
area.  On the first line are the calculated concentration figures
for two inversion heights with typical nonsmog day winds.

                           TABLE  1

         CALCULATED AREA SO2  CONCENTRATIONS
               San Francisco Bay Area (500 mi^ )
                  SO2 emissions   1147 T/day
                                Inversion Height
    Ventilation        	
        Rate               1500 ft.              1000 ft
       8 mph           0. 07 ppm SO2         0.11ppmSO2
       5 mph           0. 11                  0. 17
       2 mph           0. 29                  0. 43


      (Ref:  Wohlers,  Community Air. Pollution Sources)
The succeeding lines of calculations show the results of altering
the meteorological parameters in ways that are typical of moder-
ate and severe air pollution days.  When the inversion is lowered
to a moderate level with constant winds, the result is a  propor-
tional but moderate increase in concentration.  When the inversion
is left at its average height and the average wind is  dropped to
2 mph,  the resulting calculated concentration change is  still pro-
portionate but it is obviously much more pronounced than in the
inversion change.  In the low-inversion, low-wind situation the
wind is still the dominant feature.  It is generally much more
realistic to expect a several-fold change in wind speed than in
inversion height.

     When the day's smog story is written, however, it will prob-
ably begin with:  "A strong inversion layer sealed off the area
today and smog concentrations quickly climbed to irritation
levels. "  Perhaps the wind pattern will be mentioned, perhaps not.
STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIPS

     Another way of viewing the inversion and wind relationship is
to correlate their values with air pollution measurements.  This

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 RELATIVE FACTORS IN URBAN POLLUTION               231

 has been done many times and perhaps it is dangerous to present
 individual examples; however, since the object of this discussion
 is to look for over-emphasized inversions,  some selection is
 perhaps excusable.  In the Los Angeles air pollution situation, the
 temperature inversion has probably received its earliest and
 widest attention.  Thus a more careful look at some of the rela-
 tions among inversions,  wind, and smog in Los Angeles may pro-
 vide a  valuable example.

    It  should be pointed out that the Los Angeles inversion is
 primarily a subsidence inversion  associated with the subtropical
 Pacific High.  The height of the base averages between 1000  and
 1500 feet during the  summer and fall months.   The  inversion
 base is below 3000 feet for 80 to 90 percent of the time from June
 through October.   Below the inversion base, thermal turbulence
 will be a dominant factor  in mixing emissions.  The air below the
 inversion is usually  identified with the on-shore movement of
 marine air, while the air above the inversion is dry superior air.
    A  number of years ago Stanford Research Institute correlated
 oxidant data with  various  meteorological variables.  These factors
 included the afternoon height of the inversion base and the daily
 wind movement in the Los Angeles area.  Both simple and partial
 correlation coefficients were  calculated on the  basis of data for
 the period of July 1 to November 30,  1952.   The results are
 shown  in Table 2.

                          TABLE  2

     CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS FOR LOS ANGELES
                 (July 1-November 30, 1952)

                                          Single        Partial
   Relationship-1 PM Observations     Correlation Correlation
                                      Coefficient  Coefficient
 Oxidant--Wind Speed (m =  130)           -0. 70        -0. 41
 Oxidant--Inversion Height  (m = 130)      -0.67        -0.29
     The simple correlation coefficients between total oxidant
and either wind speed or inversion height were high.  The nega-
tive result is expected with both variables.   The partial correla-
tions do not show the same picture, however,  and the correlation
for oxidant and wind speed is higher than that for oxidant and in-
version height.  Other calculations have shown that in  Los Angeles
there is a strong correlation between inversion height  and wind,
and thus it is necessary to use partial correlations  to separate
this interrelationship.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
232
                           ROBINSON
      Correlations such as these were carried out several times
with Los Angeles observational records for various periods.  The
results in general showed less correlation between inversions and
smog than was shown here.   Thus it seems that the  subsidence
inversion is  not as significant a factor in the Los Angeles smog
picture as many  writers have claimed.
URBAN CLIMATOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

      The statement has already been made that for diffusion of
urban pollution the effects of wind movement are more important
than are the  effects of inversion.  One apparent explanation for
the lesser role of the  inversion is the heat island produced  by the
city itself.  This phenomenon would produce less stable surface
conditions within the city without its being apparent at the usual
neighboring airport observation point.

      This factor of urban climate has been carefully studied by
Duckworth and Sandberg (Figure 1).  Their study showed not only
that large temperature gradients occurred at night between  open
and urban areas but also that this temperature effect frequently
caused instability up to  about 3 times  the roof height.  The  study
also related  the magnitude of this heating effect  to the size  of the
city:  the more developed the city,  the more it modified its
   700
                 58
                      so
                                              68
                            62    64     66
                            TEMPERATURE, °F
Figure 1.  San Francisco wiresonde data for 2210 PST, 26 March 1952, showing soundings
        over built-up (B) and adjacent undeveloped (U) areas.


                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 RELATIVE FACTORS IN URBAN POLLUTION                233

 atmosphere; thus the  larger the city,  the less likely it is to have
 surface inversion conditions.

      The impact of this urban heating effect on pollution diffu-
 sion seems quite clear.  The polluted layers are unstable during
 the day because of the solar heating of the buildings and pavement
 areas,  and at night the heat lost by these surfaces is enough to
 prevent strong stable  conditions from building up.  There is prob-
 ably not much change  in the stability conditions over the central
 urban areas.  Thus it is not surprising that pollutant concentra-
 tions are not highly responsive to stability parameters such as
 inversion height  or inversion conditions measured outside the
 central area.
 INTER-CITY COMPARISONS

      Another way to consider these urban diffusion factors is to
 compare similar pollution data from several different cities.
 Data for three California areas are  shown in Figure 2: Berkeley
 is in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles is in the Southern
 California Los Angeles basin, and Riverside is 50 miles inland
 from the Los Angeles basin.  The pollutant shown in these  data is
 the daily oxidant maximum concentration for 1960.

   CONCENTRATION, ppn,
   0 40 i   	—	>
        BERKELEY
   0.30
   0 20
   0 60
   O'.SO
   0.40
   0 30
   0.20
   0. 10
LOS ANGELES
                         MAY   JUNE   JULY   AUG  SEPT
   Figure 2.  Daily maximum oxidant concentrations in three California cities, 1960
           (potassium iodide method).

      If the potential air pollution hazard can be judged from the
yearly maximum value of oxidant, these areas  did not differ
greatly in I960:  the maximum value in Berkeley was 0. 30; in Los
Angeles, 0. 45; and in  Riverside, 0. 37.  The frequency of the high
concentration days, however,  is  considerably different for the
three  areas.  High values,  though rare in Berkeley, were the
general thing in  Los Angeles  except for the winter months,  and


SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
234                       ROBINSON

were the normal situation in Riverside during the summer and
fall.
      This pattern is not explained by the inversion conditions,
because there is very little difference between those in Los
Angeles and in Berkeley.  An important factor that does differ is
the wind.   Berkeley has considerably more wind than either Los
Angeles or Riverside, and the wind is normally strongest in mid-
summer.   When the wind blows, Berkeley has little pollutant
accumulation as shown by the data;  on the few days when the wind
does not blow the  pollutant peaks can occur.

      A comparison of the Los Angeles and Riverside data indi-
cates the  ineffectiveness of thermal mixing as an important factor
in establishing community pollution levels.  Riverside is in an
area that  regularly is considerably  warmer than Los Angeles.
This warmer temperature causes the inversion base to rise
rapidly during the day and to exceed that reached by the inversion
over Los  Angeles. Although it is difficult to compare pollution
values without studying the source areas, the data at hand still
might be appraised in the following  manner:  (a) Since the devel-
opment in Riverside is less than in  Los Angeles,  lower pollution
levels would be expected;  (b) if increased thermal turbulence
were  a major additional factor reducing pollution levels at River-
side,  concentrations should be significantly lower than in Los
Angeles;  (c) since concentrations are not markedly lower, it
seems doubtful that  much  reduction in air concentration values
ran be attributed to  the midday inversion height.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

      Several aspects of the stability-wind situation have been
described.  First, pollutant concentrations were shown to be
better related to wind conditions than to inversion conditions;
second, it was pointed out that wind conditions normally vary
over a wider range than stability conditions; and third,  it was
shown that the  city itself is the cause of prevailing unstable  con-
ditions in the polluted air.  In spite of facts such as these, the
idea is still prevalent that pollution problems go hand-in-hand
with inversion  conditions.

      The  Public Health Service   Weather Bureau meteorologists
have made a valuable step in the proper direction with their large-
area air pollution studies.  In these studies they have pointed out
that a  stagnating anticyclone  is the basic characteristic of large-
scale urban pollution incidents.  The stagnating High brings to an
area both a weak wind pattern and low-level stability.  The pre-
ceding discussion has tried to make the point that the wind pattern
is more important than the stability.   Perhaps it would be even

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 RELATIVE FACTORS IN URBAN POLLUTION               235

 more logical to argue  that since a stagnating anticyclone is the
 basic meteorological cause of air pollution troubles,  then  air
 pollution meteorology  should deal primarily with this weather
 system rather than with various individual or local wind and in-
 version conditions.  The Public Health Service studies take this
 more inclusive type of approach.  It is to be hoped that their re-
 sults will have the needed impact on air pollution thinking.

     It seems clear that air pollution meteorologists have been
 caught in a trap caused by the popular nature of air pollution
 troubles.  In an effort to supply meteorological explanations to a
 large nontechnical audience, a "popular" description of the
 weather factors was provided.   A semi-mysterious warm  air
 layer,  called an inversion,  was a more interesting concept to pre-
 sent to the public than either the prevailing winds or the stagnat-
 ing anticyclone.   Once the description was provided, it  reproduced
 itself many times, and repetition made it  "authentic. "  Progress
 toward public understanding of air pollution meteorology depends
 upon how rapidly  this popularized erroneous description can be
 replaced with real definitions.
                         DISCUSSION

      MR. FIELD:  I was just curious.  How many stations do you
 use when you arrive at an oxidant figure for the city of Los
 Angeles?  And when you say maximum concentration, is that  an
 average or the peak reached during the day?

      MR. ROBINSON:  These data were the peak values attained
 by a recording instrument situated in downtown Los Angeles.
 This is not necessarily  an average value for the City of Los
 Angeles, which would be more difficult to  realize.  These  data
 are probably representative of rather large  areas within the city.
      MR. FIELD:  Well, I  am curious. How  do you select the
 station?  Is  it simply put there because it  is there?
      MR. ROBINSON:  Mr.  Kauper has probably had more to do
 with selecting the stations than anybody else here.  All I did was
 select the data.

      MR. KAUPER: That was his first mistake.
     I hope  I am the reverse of the architect.  We  advise  where
 stations  go,  and then architect types  choose stations. It depends
 where there  is space available,  within rather broad limits. In
 this case, I  think that our downtown Los Angeles station has
 varied from  the top of our present building,  which is in skid row,
 six floors up, to the middle of town,  considered as  Pershing


SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
236                       ROBINSON

Square, sitting within a bunch of banana trees, and directly over
a rather large parking lot.  The resulting oxidant values at these
various locations have varied considerably. Not because the
instrument was  changed,  but because the environment was changed.
At the time  of this work,  in 1960, the station was on the 6th floor,
in a rundown section of town, and slightly east of the main traffic
area.

      MR. FIELD:   I am  just wondering how you can compare
values from three different stations if they are set up without any
regard to conditions you are trying to measure.  I am sure if you
set up three stations in one city, you will get three different  vari-
ations.

      MR. KAUPER:  That is what we have now.

      DR. NEIBERGER:  How many do you have now?

      MR. KAUPER:  I haven't looked lately but there are prob-
ably about seven --  not in the city, but in the county area. They
range from extreme west to east,  and as a rule the oxidant values
seem to come out higher  in the direction toward Riverside and
lower toward the coast.   As a matter of fact,  our downtown Los
Angeles readings are relatively lower than those in the eastern
suburbs region.

      MR. ROBINSON: I did not put  the data for Anaheim in  here
because I didn't want to get into the argument  as to how much
Disneyland  might have done to the  oxidant, but the data did show
that with  the eastward transport of the marine  air, it continued
to develop higher oxidant concentrations.

      MR. HOLZWORTH: I think these data you showed were
from the  publication by the State Department of Public Health.

      MR. ROBINSON: Yes.

      MR. HOLZWORTH: Having  been with them for a time,  I
am somewhat familiar with their selection of these data.  In order
to make as  much data available as possible and at the same'time
to cover as  much territory of the state as possible,  they include
one station  for each county.   They give consideration to the con-
tinuity of  the data,  the reliability of the data from each station
(such as breakdown  of the instruments,  and so on),  and to the
representativeness  of the stations.  For  instance at Riverside
County there is  more than one instrument, but they chose  one and
they hope that that station will remain in the same place for a long
time to come, so that they will have  a long comparative record.

      DR. NEIBERGER:  First, I wanted to say something about
inversions and then  I want to  ask something about Riverside.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
RELATIVE FACTORS IN URBAN POLLUTION                237

     The role of the inversion is obviously a necessary one,
even though it isn't a sufficient one.  That is shown by the fact
that even though you get the advection of the air from Los Angeles
over in the desert very often,  somehow or other you never get
eye irritation.   The same air  manages to mix to still higher
levels.  So I don't think that you can belittle the inversion; it  is a
necessary part  of the picture.   The fact that winds are important
I think has been recognized.  I don't know at whom the criticism
was aimed, but I was among the first to have written on this sub-
ject, about 15 years ago.  In a little bit earlier work Leopold  and
Veer, who, as far as I know,  gave the first study of air pollution
in  Los Angeles,  mention the inversion and then devote most of
their paper (in the transactions for  the AGU for 1945) to the wind
patterns over Los Angeles.

     So I think it has been recognized all the time that this vol-
ume of air through which the pollution can go is a function of these
factors:  the horizontal dispersion due to the wind, the vertical
dispersion due to the wind, and the  limitation to vertical disper-
sion due to the inversion.  And I remember many times we said
that the only reason they didn't have this type of smog at all in
those days in San Francisco was that they have twice as much
wind as we do.
     But I wanted to ask what specifically you had in  mind about
Riverside, because we  have at various times examined the trajec-
tories of the air and the behavior of the oxidant as it moves along
from the  west coast.  At this time of year when we get drifts
towards the coast the worst  situation is out in the western part of
the area.  But ordinarily,  in most of the smog, we follow it from
the west coast,  where there is practically zero oxidant, (8 or 9
ppm maximum)  into the  downtown area, where you get 20 to 30
ppm, then to Pasadena,  where it might be 30 to 40 ppm, and then
continuing all the  way through  to the late afternoon,  when the  peak
value is reached at Riverside.   And the fact is that most of the
time,  even though the inversion just about gets wiped  out at River-
side, the maximum is still reached there.
     I was wondering what type of study you had in mind at
Riverside.
     MR. ROBINSON:  The point that I was trying to  make on
that Riverside-Los Angeles  comparison was that if you take the
surface temperatures and  extrapolate them against the upper air
soundings you get an increased depth of turbulence,  an increased
depth of mixing  as the trajectory moves inland.  In some of my
own thinking, perhaps,  this has tended to play  a more important
role than more careful  consideration might have placed on it.
This thermal turbulence, which I think is a factor in the Central


SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
238                       ROBINSON

Valley of California --in Sacramento and Stockton --is almost
cutting away at the base of the inversion.  Increased turbulence
does not seem to be as important a factor in all the  air pollution
concentrations  as one might expect from reading some  of the
technical writings on urban air pollution studies.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                     Measurement Programs Required for
                                     Evaluation of Man-Made and Natural
                                     Contaminants in Urban Areas*

                                     E. W. HEWSON, E. W. BIERLY, and
                                     G. C. GILL,  Meteorological Laboratories,
                                     The  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
                                     Michigan
Summary
     Existing studies of diffusion in transitional states emphasize the need for more
comprehensive research programs near shorelines, over lakes, over varying terrains, in
valleys, within forests, and over and within uncomplicated cities of various sizes.  Be-
cause of the serious public health problems created by aeroal lergens, many more centers
are needed for aeroallergen research.  Pollen samplers that minimize nonisokinetic
sampling errors must be developed. Television towers should be widely instrumented,
not only for lapse rates in typical varieties of terrain, but also for contaminant evalua-
tion.  Tracer studies are needed to permit direct and accurate determination of diffusion
coefficients.  Relatively simple methods are required to assess long-term trends of  pollu-
tion by industrial waste products.  Methods of calibrating electrical conductivity measure-
ments in terms of air pollution levels  should be devised and used widely.
URGENT PROBLEM AREAS

Diffusion In Uniform And Steady States

      It is  clearly logical to begin the evaluation of atmospheric
diffusion by studying diffusion under the least complex circum-
stances.  For this reason most of the comprehensive investigations
undertaken thus far have been confined to the  simplest steady-
state conditions.   Such studies have been  made in England •"•"»    '
28, in the United States 2,  4,  19,  and in the U. S. S. R. 21,  24 for
uniform and  level terrain and for limited time periods,  over which
atmospheric conditions were effectively uniform and steady in
space and time.
      Within cities, however,  the  presence  of buildings  and other
obstructions to air flow leads to  substantially different diffusion
patterns. It is unfortunate  that virtually no observational data on
diffusion within typical cities  are available. A beginning should
be made by conducting a measurement program of atmospheric
'Research conducted under U. S.  Public Health Service Grant AP-1 (Publication No. 29)
 and under National Science Foundation Grant G-11404

 Publication No. 57 from the Meteorological Laboratories of The University of Michigan

                                   239

-------
240               HEWSON, BIERLY AND GILL

diffusion with a city under the simplest possible conditions. The
city should be one on a flat terrain,  without topographic features,
with statistical uniformity of building type and size.  The study
should be conducted near the center of the city, away from edge
effects. Appropriate times for the field investigations should also
be chosen. The most satisfactory periods of the day will be from
0 to 4 hours and from 12 to  IS hours, and the best meteorological
conditions will have wind speed and direction most nearly constant,
so that steady-state conditions most nearly prevail.  Later studies
would be made in  succession in cities having increasingly more
complex terrain and  structural diversity.

      Some of the techniques and instrumentation required for such
studies will be discussed in later sections.
Diffusion In Transitional States

      Most of the existing diffusion theories are based on the as-
sumption that turbulent diffusion is invariant with time and space,
a basis that requires exclusion of a wide range of situations that
are of the utmost importance in urban air pollution.  The atmos-
phere is a dynamic  entity whose diffusional characteristics  may
and often do change  radically within short periods of time.  When
the field of atmospheric turbulence exhibits marked variations in
time  or space or both,  then the resulting atmospheric diffusion
may be referred to  as "diffusion in transitional states. "
Diffusion in River Valleys   The first investigation of diffusion in
transitional states was conducted in the Columbia River Valley
near Trail, British  Columbia. 16  Two examples were discovered,
one associated with  a space variation of turbulence and the second
with a time variation.   The space variation resulted from a dry
adiabatic lapse rate in the lower portion of the valley surmounted
by an inversion aloft but in the valley.  Although turbulence and
mixing were pronounced below, high concentrations of SO2 occurred
at the  surface because the inversion aloft prevented upward diffu-
sion out  of the valley.   A similar condition has since been shown
to be the primary contributing factor in Los Angeles smog.  Con-
tainment of pollutants beneath an inversion aloft  even when terrain
does not  limit horizontal mixing has been named "trapping. " ^ 15

      The time variation within the Columbia River Valley oc-
curred during the morning hours in summer, when solar heating
caused a turbulent layer to develop upward from the surface,  re-
placing an inversion. When this turbulent layer reached the smoke
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES                     241

plume aloft, it brought high concentrations of SO2 to the valley,
a process known as "fumigation" caused by "inversion breakup
diffusion. " H  Many other examples of this process over  flat
terrain have since been found.
Diffusion Near Shore Lines   Because of the need for an adequate
water supply, river valleys and shore lines are preferred loca-
tions for cities and industries.  Some of the aspects of the "diffu-
sion in transitional states" in river valleys have been mentioned
above,  but relatively little research on such diffusion near shore
                                                       1 7  1 R
lines has been conducted,  although a start has been made.  >

     The construction of  nuclear power plants at shore-line lo-
cations on the Great Lakes has led to measurement programs that
will establish the air pollution climatology of these areas.  The
authors are engaged in such measurement programs at the  Enrico
Fermi Atomic Power Plant near Monroe, Michigan,  at the  west
end of Lake Erie and at the Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant
near Charlevoix,  Michigan,  on the east side of Lake Michigan.
The latter is shown in Figure 1, an aerial photograph showing the
plant in the foreground and the  250-foot instrumented meteorolog-
ical tower behind it, very near the water's edge.  Figure 2 shows
the steel  tower and wooden pole as viewed from the lake. Ane-
mometers and wind vanes are installed at 32 and 64 feet on the
pole and at 128 and 256 feet on  the tower.  Water temperature at
3 feet beneath the lake  surface  and air temperature at 10, 50,  100,
150,  200, and 250  feet  on  the tower are measured for lapse-rate
determinations. All winds and temperatures are recorded in the
small building at the base of the tower.

     At a shore line the horizontal distribution of the diffusion
field is the important factor. Marked horizontal variations  in
turbulence may be due  to horizontal differences in the tempera-
ture of the underlying surface;  these temperature differences in-
duce or suppress thermal turbulence.  Alternatively,   such horizon-
tal variations in turbulence may be due to differences in the rough-
ness of the underlying surface; these differences also can cause
mechanical turbulence  to increase or to decrease in  intensity.  At
a shore line both surface temperature differences and surface
roughness differences may be pronounced and may combine to
produce highly complex patterns of diffusion.
     Two main types of diffusion in transitional states  should be
considered: one with the horizontal distribution of turbulence sta-
tionary; the second with the horizontal distribution varying with
time.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
242
HEWSON,  BIERLY AND GILL
  Figure 1.  Aerial view of the Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant near Charlevoix,
           Michigan, with 250-foot instrumented meteorological tower near the shore line.
                                       SEC TECHNICAL  REPORT A62-5

-------
MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES
                                                                       243
 Fijure 2. View of 250-foot meteorological tower and instrumented pole along the lake
         shore at the Sig  Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
244              HEWSON, BIERLY AND GILL

      1.  Stationary Horizontal Distribution.  There is a natural
subdivision in this category near shore lines. The most general
case is horizontal variation primarily along wind.  In this case
the diffusing plume is entirely over land or entirely over water,
A particular but important case is horizontal variation primarily
across wind.  Here the wind direction is parallel to the shore line,
so that one  side of the plume  has a land trajectory and the other
side  a water trajectory.
      2.  Horizontal Distribution Varying with Time.  This type of
variation may be associated with such factors as the diurnal vari-
ation of wind speed and lapse rate,  a frontal passage, or a shift
in wind direction resulting in a change of upwind surface rough-
ness. The  varying field of air flow associated with a regime of
land  and  the lake breezes near a shore line is an excellent example
of this type of diffusion in transitional states.

      Three aerial photographs of smoke released from the mete-
orological  tower  at the Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant illus-
trate very  well some of the complex diffusion patterns in transi-
tional states with a stationary horizontal distribution as specified
above. These photographs, taken in  July 1961, are shown in Fig-
ures  3,  4,  and 5. Figure 3 shows the behavior of the smoke plume
with  a northwest  wind from over the lake.  The initial spreading
of the smoke is limited, but diffusion becomes rapid as  mechanical
and thermal turbulence develop over land.   Figure 4 illustrates
looping of the plume under unstable conditions with thermal turbu-
lence in  southwest winds,  with the plume being brought down to
the lake  surface.  Figure  5 is an especially striking photograph
which shows the behavior  of the plume with a west to west-south-
west  wind.  Initial diffusion is limited but  is followed by very
pronounced lateral spreading of the plume.

      Detailed analyses of shore-line effects found at the site of
the Enrico Fermi Atomic  Power Plant have been given by the
         i n  -| o                                  o      i/
authors.  ^ '> ±0  The general findings to date may be summarized
as follows:

      1.  Values of Button's virtual diffusion coefficient GZ are
characteristic of those for a  3-minute sampling period,

      2.  Values of Button's virtual diffusion coefficient C  are
characteristic of those for a  1-hour sampling period.

      3.  The wind at 96 feet is relatively  strong,  12. 4  mph
averaged over a  3-year period,  in comparison with that at the
same height over a uniform land surface.

      4.  A lake-breeze inversion occurs  frequently in late spring
and early summer.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A6S-5

-------
MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES
245
Figure 3. Smoke plume behavior with a northwest wind from over the lake at the Big Rock
        Point Nuclear Power Plant.
 Figure 4.  A looping plume caused by thermal turbulence with southwest winds at the Big
         Rock Point Plant.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
246
HEWSON,  BIERLY AND GILL
  Figure 5.  Lateral shear in the smoke plume at the Big Rock Point Plant with west to
          west southwest winds.

      5.  This lake-breeze inversion moves inland about 4 miles
on the average, and diffusion improves with distance inland from
the shore line.
      6.  Prolonged inversions caused by the advection of warm
air over the cold lake occur,  but extend no  more than 8 miles in-
land,  with improving  diffusion over that distance.
      7.  During stagnant anticyclones the difference in horizontal
air density from water  to land results in local winds of sufficient
strength to provide substantial natural ventilation.
      8.  Measurements to date indicate that there is considerable
natural ventilation at  the shore line of a large lake.
      Although the researches mentioned  above were not conducted
near a city,  it is clear  that a city situated on a shore line will be
subjected to a number of localized meteorological influences; as-
certaining their exact nature will require comprehensive measure-
ment  programs.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES                     247

Diffusion in Other Transitional States   Diffusion in transitional
states near shore lines has been singled out for special attention
because the authors are engaged in field measurement programs
near shore lines.  It is clear, however, that the study of diffusion
in many other types of transitional states is of fundamental im-
portance for an adequate  understanding of the dispersive processes
at work in the air over cities. For example, diffusion within
wooded and forested areas has  received relatively little attention.
Trees have a pronounced effect on local stability patterns in the
air below, around,  and above them and in addition have a filtering
action in removing particulates. Although there have been a num-
                                  q  c 1 f^
her of studies of air flow in valleys'3' Oj  ,  many more measure-
ments of wind speed, direction, turbulence,  and temperature
lapse rate in and near cities situated in valleys are urgently
needed.  The influence of valley cities in heating the  air flowing
over them and the possible effects of this heating on air flow
patterns during very light winds should be investigated thoroughly
for such cities.
Atmospheric Pollution by Aeroallergens

     It is estimated that some ten million Americans are seri-
ously inconvenienced by aeroallergens,  airborne substances which
cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.  Ragweed pollen
is probably the worst offender among the aeroallergens.  There
is good evidence that man's land-use  practices are leading to in-
creased production and wide aerial distribution of ragweed pollen.
It is surprising,  therefore, that practically no attention has been
paid to this important public health problem  until recent years,
especially since remedial measures can be taken and others un-
covered if adequate research is conducted.
     Meteorological aspects of the production,  transport,  and
deposition of ragweed pollen are being investigated at two centers:
the University of Michigan and  Brookhaven National Laboratory.
The importance of aeroallergens as a national public health prob-
lem requires the establishment of other centers for the study of
the many  complex problems involved.
     Among the techniques developed at Michigan is that of grow-
ing preseasonal ragweed  plants that pollinate in June, well before
the regular pollen season,  which extends from mid-August through
September. Since the preseasonal plants are the only ones pollin-
ating in the area, the source of pollen in the air is clearly estab-
lished as  the experimental ragweed plot. Such a plot,   containing
over 3000 ragweed plants developed from seedlings  in the green-
house and located on the farm lands of the State Prison of Southern


SYMPOSIUM:   AIR OVER CITIES

-------
248              HEWSON, BIERLY AND GILL

Michigan at Jackson, is shown in Figure 6.

   Figure 6. Ragweed pollen plot at the State Prison of Southern Michigan, Jackson,
          Michigan.
      Determining the sources  of pollen found within cities is an
important problem that awaits solution.  Does the pollen come
from  ragweed plants within the city, which might be destroyed by
spraying, or from sources well outside the city, which would be
less amenable to control? Some of the  features of an experimental
program designed to find answers to such questions are illustrated
in Figure 7.  The map shows the route  followed by an instrumented
automobile each day during the regular ragweed  season as it trav-
eled through Ann Arbor into the adjacent farm lands and back to
the city. 25  The  shaded areas along the route give  the vegetative
characteristics of the farm lands. The  density of ragweed  stands
was estimated by  the botanists  associated with the project.  The
results of this study are being prepared for publication.

      The production and release of ragweed pollen by the  plants
occurs mainly from 7 to 11 a.m. on clear mornings.  Precipitation
or prolonged fog  in the morning will delay and reduce substantially
the pollen emission.  Our research has shown that meteorological
conditions during  May and June have a significant influence on the
subsequent pollen crop.   Objective forecasting methods that are


                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT  A62-5

-------
 MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES
249
 now being developed hold promise of yielding forecasts of pollen
 concentrations on both a daily and a seasonal basis.
   ;>SSX RURAL, TILLED

   |§g§S RURAL, UNTILLEO

   '•-f.^f URBAN
 Figure 7. Route of mobile sampling program through Ann Arbor, Michigan, and surround-
        ing areas.
      There is evidence that the  sensitivity of many individuals
to ragweed pollen is a function of the current meteorological con-
ditions.  This phase of the problem has been barely touched,  and
many  measurement programs will  be required before significant
progress is made.
      Since source strength, atmospheric dispersion, and receptor
reaction are all dependent on fluctuating atmospheric conditions,
it may be that the pollen dispersion problem represents the tran-
sitional state problem in its ultimate meteorological complexity.

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
250              HEWSON,  BIERLY AND GILL

      Although ragweed pollen is,  medically speaking, the most
important of the aeroallergens,  there are many others, including
spores,  rusts, and smuts.  Carefully devised measurement pro-
grams are needed if we are to make progress in combating this
growing public health problem.

RECOMMENDED MEASUREMENT PROGRAMS

      The following outline of recommendations is not meant to be
inclusive.  It represents only those programs that are urgently re-
quired if continued progress is to be made.  Comprehensive  cover-
age of the instrumentation currently available and in use,  its ad-
vantages and disadvantages, methods of mounting,  etc., is avail-
able elsewhere. 14  For this reason only general outlines of the
needed programs are given here.

Standardization Studies

      Such a variety of measurements have  been proposed and
undertaken from time to time that  a serious attempt to achieve
even limited standardization of requirements is an important next
step.   Valuable progress in that direction has recently been made,''
but even more fully detailed specifications are now required,  It
may be necessary to set up a specific project for the purpose at
some appropriate  center, with provision for consultants to aid in
the essential decision making.  Examples of specifications needed
are as follows: the height and  exposure of wind sensors,  permis-
sible limits in the response characteristics of wind sensors used
to measure  atmospheric turbulence,  and minimum accuracy re-
quirements  for lapse-rate temperature  measurements.

Air Pollution Climatology Studies

      It is essential to establish air pollution climatologies for a
number of cities of various sizes subject to various climatic
regimes and with a variety  of terrain features.  Many of the
problems described in earlier sections  will be solved most ex-
peditiously by an intensive program of installing appropriate
meteorological and sampling equipment on existing and future
television towers.

      Meteorological and sampling programs that utilize TV towers
have been proposed for a number of years, 12  but little progress
has been made in implementing the proposals.  H.  W. Baynton and
associates were responsible for instrumenting the first tower,
WJBK-TV,  located in northwestern Detroit, as part of the Detroit-
Windsor International Air Pollution Investigation. 20   This


                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES                     251

installation was later placed under the care of the Meteorological
Laboratories of The  University of Michigan.  Temper ature-
measuring units are  installed  at heights of 20, 300, 600, and 870
feet.  The top portion of the 1050-foot tower consists of the radi-
ating antenna. Figure 8 is a photograph of the tower showing the
platforms at 300,  600, and 870 feet, where the artificially venti-
lated temperature sensors are mounted.  Figure  9 shows the
lowest sensor mounted beneath the platform at 20 feet.  It is pro-
posed that all the sensors be relocated on booms  extending hori-
zontally from the tower to minimize the  possibility of errors due
to radiational heating or cooling of the tower during the day or  at
night.
      A  recent detailed study of air pollution in Nashville, Tennessee,
led to the installation of wind speed and direction transmitters  at
251-and  501-foot levels on the  WSM-TV tower. 30

      Until more definitive standards for tower instrumentation
can be established, it is proposed that temperatures or temper-
ature differences be  measured at 200-foot intervals if possible,
with an accuracy of 0. 20 .   Because of the positions of tower plat-
forms, instruments may have  to be spaced at greater intervals.
Anemometers and wind vanes  should be mounted at the same
heights,  and the response characteristics of the  vanes  should be
sensitive enough to justify their use as accurate sensors of the
horizontal component of atmospheric  turbulence.   A high-grade
turbulence sensor, such as a rapid response bivane without ex-
cessive  overshoot for all ranges of turbulent eddies, should be
maintained at the station at a level of 200 or higher.  All data
should be recorded at the base of the  tower.

      Installations  of this type  should be established at a number
of cities of various sizes and with various climatic and terrain
features,  With such installations  in operation it will be  possible
to study diffusion over cities in uniform and steady states and in
a wide variety of transitional states.

      Supplementary wind and  turbulence data would be obtained
from wind sensors on 30-foot  (10-meter) masts at a limited
number  of other stations in and near the city and in the streets  on
horizontal cables stretched between buildings, well above the im-
mediate  influence of  street traffic. Precipitation measurements
should be taken by  means  of one or more recording rain gages in
locations with good exposures.
     It must be emphasized that well-designed programs of at-
mospheric sampling  must supplement the meteorological measure-
ments if results are  to be significant.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
      HE\VSON,  BIERLY AND GILL
Figure 8.  View of the WJBK-TV tower, Detroit, Michigan.
                       SEC TECHNICAL REPORT  A62-5

-------
 MEASUREMENTS KOH URBAN STUDIES
253
 Figure 9. Detail of the WJBK-TV tower showing the lowest sensor beneath the platform
        at the 20-foot level.

 Aeroallergen Studies

     The prime requirement for advance  in aeroallergen studies
 is the development of a simple and accurate sampler for  pollens
 such as those of ragweed.  An isokinetic sampler 9 is required
 for accurate sampling of ragweed pollen (18/u),  but such  a sampler
 presents severe design problems.  The sampler  should be able to
 operate reliably without attention for a minimum period of 24 hours
 if it is  to displace the simple but highly inaccurate gravity slide
 sampler.

     A number of other measurement programs are needed, such
as those designed to determine the variation of ragweed pollen
 source  strength as a function of  meteorological conditions,  the
distance traveled by such pollen, the role  played by  precipitation
in scavenging, and the filtering action of natural  vegetation . .11 pol-
lens and oilier aeroallergens.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
254              HEWSON, BIERLY AND GILL

Tracer Studies

      An important technique in evaluating the dispersive prop-
erties of the atmosphere is the use of tracer substances such as
ZnCdS as a fine powder or liquid uranine dye.  Such tracers may
be used to follow air motion and turbulent diffusion over a wide
range of distances from a hundred feet or so, representing the
distance between a source and an air conditioning intake, to a
hundred miles or so, representing diffusion over  a megalopolis
such as that along the east coast.

Model Studies

      Model studies in  wind tunnels have been most useful in the
past in estimating the amount of aerodynamic downwash of plume
gases occurring in the  lee of buildings.   '     A second important
application is in delineating the details of air flow around buildings,
Much remains to be done in using wind tunnel model studies to
predict the effect of nearby terrain features on the movement of
contaminants in their vicinity.  Existing programs should be ex-
tended and new programs should be established to permit wide
and more effective use  of this  powerful tool.

Turbidity and Conductivity Studies

      Certain types  of studies  are  required to assess long-term
trends in urban pollution levels. A network of turbidity stations
has been established, but the areal distribution of this network
                    o o
should be increased.    It has been known for some  time that the
electrical conductivity  of the atmosphere is related to its particu-
late pollution content. 2"  The use of this method to assess long-
term trends in pollution was strongly recommended  a number of
years ago, 12 but no action has resulted.  Calibration methods
should be developed and an active program for measurement of
electrical conductivity  in the atmosphere and study of its relation
to particulate pollution  should  be established in a number of cities,

Carbon Dioxide Studies

      The possible influence on our climate of increased CC>2 in
the atmosphere resulting from our combustion of fossil fuels
should be thoroughly studied.  For an adequate program, CC>2
should be measured on  a routine basis year after year at a number
of points far from sources, such as large cities. Routine observa-
tions of CC>2 on a number of oceanic weather ships would be par-
ticularly helpful.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES                    255
                          REFERENCES

 1.  Bierly,  E. W. ,  and E.  W. Hewson,  1962:  Some Restrictive
      Meteorological Conditions to be Considered in the Design of
      Stacks,  Submitted for publication.
 2.  Bowne,  N. E., 1961:  "Some measurements of diffusion
      parameters from smoke plumes, " Bull. Amer. Meteor.
      Soc.,  42, 101-105.
 3.  Buettner,  K. J.  K. , and N. Thyer,  1959: On Mountain and
      Valley Winds, Final Report,  Contract AF 19 (604)   2289,
      AFCRC-TR-59-283, Department of Meteorology and Clima-
      tology,  University of Washington.
 4.  Cramer, H. E., F.  A.  Record,  and H.  C.  Vaughan,  1958:
      The study of the diffusion of gases or aerosols in the lower
      atmosphere^  Cambridge, Mass.  Inst.  of Tech. ,  AFCRC-
      TR-58-239.
 5.  Davidson, B.,  1961:  "Wind valley phenomena and air pollution
      problems," J. Air Poll. Control Assoc.,  11,  364-368, 383.
 6.  Dingle,  A. N., G. C. Gill,  W. H.  Wagner,  Jr.,  and E.  W.
      Hewson, 1959: "The  emission, dispersion, and deposition
      of ragweed pollen, " Adv. Geophysics,  6,  367-387.
 7.  Gill, G. C. ,  H.  Moses, and M. E.  Smith" 1961:  "Current
      thinking on meteorological instrumentation for use in air
      pollution problems, " J.  Air  Poll.  Control Assoc. ,  11,
      77-82, 96.
 8.  Halitsky,  J. ,  1962:  "Some Aspects of Atmospheric Diffusion
      in Urban Areas, " Symposium:  The Air Over Cities,
 9.  Harrington, J. B. , Jr., G. C. Gill, and B. R. Warr, 1959:
      "High-efficiency pollen samplers for use in clinical allergy, "
      J.  Allergy,  30,  357-375.
10.  Hay, J.  S. , and F. Pasquill,  1959:  "Diffusion from a con-
      tinuous source in relation to the spectrum and scale of tur-
      bulence,  "  Adv. Geophysics,  6,  345-365.
11.  Hewson,  E. W., 1945:  "The meteorological control of at-
      mospheric pollution by heavy  industry, " Quart. J. R.
      Meteor.  Soc.,  71,  266-282.
12,  Hewson,  E. W. , 1952:  Meteorology Panel,  in Air  Pollution
     L.  C. McCabe, Ed., New York, McGraw-Hill,  10-13.
13.  Hewson, E. W. , 1955:  "Stack Heights Required to Minimize
     Ground Concentrations, "  Trans.  Amer. Soc. Mech. Engrs. ,
     77_,  1163-72.
14,  Hewson, E. W. , 1962:  "Meteorological  measurements,  "
     Air Pollution, A Comprehensive Treatise,  Vol.  I, A. C.
     Stern,  Ed., New York, Academic Press,  528-567.
 SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
256              HEWSON, BIERLY AND GILL

15.  Hewson,  E. W. ,  (in press):  "Meteorological measuring
      techniques and methods for air pollution studies, " Industrial
      Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol. 3.  L.  Silverman, Ed. , New
      York, Interscience.
16.  Hewson,  E. W. ,  and G. C.  Gill, 1944: "Meteorological inves-
      tigations in Columbia River Valley near Trail,  B. C. , "
      Report submitted to the Trail Smelter Arbitral Tribunal by
      R.S. Dean and R.E. Swain.  Bull.  U. S. Bur.  Mines No.
      453, 23-228.
17.  Hewson,  E. W. , G.  C. Gill, and  E.  W.  Bierly,  1960:
      Atmospheric diffusion study at the Enrico  Fermi Nuclear
      Reactor Site.  Ann Arbor,  Univ.  of Michigan Research
      Institute,  Report No. 2728-3-T,  19  pp.
18.  Hewson,  E. W. , E.  W. Bierly, and G. C.  Gill,  1961:
      "Topographic influences on the behavior of stack effluents, "
      Proceedings of the American Power Conference, 1961,  23,
      358-370.
19.  Hilst, G. R. , and C.  L.  Simpson, 1958:  "Observations of
      vertical diffusion rates  in stable  atmospheres, " J. Meteor.
      15,  125-126.
20.  International Joint Commission, 1960:  "Relation between
      pollution levels and meteorological factors, " Report of
      the  International Joint Commission,  United States and
      Canada, on the pollution of the atmosphere in the Detroit
      River area,  164-206^
21.  Kanzanskii, A.  B. , and A. S. Monin, 1957: "On the shape
      of smoke plumes, "  Trans, from  Bulletin (Izvestiya) of the
      Academy of Sciences of the U. S. S. R., Geophysics Series,
      No.  8,  56-70.
22.  Lowry, P.  H. ,  1951:  "Microclimate factors in smoke pol-
      lution from tall stacks, " Meteor. Monogr. ,  1, No. 4, 24-29.
23.  McCormick, R.  A.,   1960: (Personal communication).
24.  Monin, A.  S. , 1959:  "Smoke propagation in the  surface
      layer of the atmosphere, " Adv. Geophysics, 6,  331-343.
25.  Sheldon,  J. M. ,  and E. W.  Hewson,  1959:  Atmospheric
      pollution by aeroallergens.  Ann  Arbor,  Univ. of Michigan
      Research  Institute,  Report No. 2421-3-P,  103pp.
26.  Sherlock, R.  H. , and E. J. Lesher,  1955:  "Design of
      chimneys  to control  down-wash of gases, " Trans. Amer.
      Soc. mech. Engrs.,  77,  1-9.
27.  Stewart,  N. G.,  H. J.~Gale, and R.  N. Crooks,  1958: "The
      atmospheric diffusion of gases discharged  from the chimney
      of the Harwell reactor BEPO, " Int.  J. Air Poll. , _!,  87-102.
28.  Button, G. G. , 1947:  "The theoretical distribution "of air-
      borne pollution  from factory chimneys, " Quart.  J.  R.
      meteor. Soc.,  73,  426-436.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MEASUREMENTS FOR URBAN STUDIES                     257


29.  Wait, G. R.,  1946:  "Some experiments relating to the
     electrical conductivity of the lower atmosphere, " J. Wash.
     Acad.  Sci. , ^6, 321-343.
30.  Zeidberg, L. D. ,  J.  J.  Schueneman, P. A. Humphrey,  and
     R. A.  Prindle, 1961:  "Air pollution and health: general
     description of a study in Nashville, Tennessee, " J. Air
     Poll. Control Assoc. , 11, 289-297.
                      DISCUSSION

     DR.  SCHMIDT:  What sort of thermometers do you use in
your television masts?

     PROFESSOR HEWSON:  I can tell you about our own
installations,  We have used thermocouples more widely.
     Ted  Munn, what was  on the TV tower?
     MR.  MUNN: A Honeywell Resistance Thermometer.

     DR.  SCHMIDT:  We used thermometers also on television
masts,  but we had difficulties  as a consequence of the large elec-
trical field.  It was unmanageable.
     MR.  MUNN: We have had this problem with radio towers
but not television towers.

     PROFESSOR HEWSON:  There was some difficulty with the
upper levels, but I think that was the shielding that was developed
at the point.   This is an important aspect to keep in mind to make
sure that it is  covered  adequately.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
                                   The Representativeness of Local
                                   Observations in Air Pollution Surveys

                                   MAYNARD E. SMITH, Meteorology Group,
                                   Brookhaven National Laboratory,
                                   Upton, Long Island, N. Y.
Summary
     The need for appropriate meteorological data in the evaluation of air pollution
problems is now generally conceded.  The natural tendency is to use existing observa-
vational data whenever the material seems pertinent. In investigations by the Brookhaven
Meteorology Group, data from a number of sources, including tower and surface observa-
tions, have been compared.  Depending on the circumstances, both the differences and
similarities are striking. Enough information is now available to indicate situations in
which data may be validly transferred from one site to another and those in which transfer
should not be attempted. Careful estimates  of wind and stability distributions for sites
with complex terrain may often be far superior to an inappropriate transfer of data.
      With the  constantly increasing interest in air pollution,
 there is an associated need for appropriate meteorological data
 for evaluation of the problems.  Obtaining such information in
 its original form is time-consuming and expensive,  and the
 question of the suitability of existing information naturally arises.
 In this paper,  some of the problems involved in transferring data
 from one site to another are considered,  and examples of suita-
 ble and unsuitable transfer are shown.

      In the meteorological program at Brookhaven  National
 Laboratory, the opportunity has arisen for the examination of
 data from various locations, and in this study two sets  of records
 are used.   The first includes wind data obtained from three ele-
 vated installations  along the east coast  of the United States.  The
 maximum separation  of these sites  is about 150 miles,  but all are
 in rather flat terrain  and located near the  coast.   The  locations
 of these three sites are shown in Figure 1, and are  designated
 as Brookhaven,  South Norwalk,  and Delaware City.
      The meteorological instruments from which the wind data
 were obtained were all mounted on structures above the ground.
 The  instruments at  Brookhaven were  supported on a meteorolog-
ical tower, those at South Norwalk on a tank,  and those at Dela-
ware City on a  refinery structure.  Heights of the instrumenta-
tion ranged from 150  to 350 feet above ground.  The other group
of records was obtained  from three local airports in western New
York State, all in rolling but not rugged terrain,  and located
                                 259

-------
260
                            SMITH
                        Figure 1. Coastal Sites
                         Figure 2. Inland Sites

somewhat closer to each other than the coastal stations.   Figure
2 shows the relative positions of the inland stations:  Dansville,
Jamestown,  and Olean.  At these sites the meteorological equip-
ment was mounted about 30 feet above  ground, so that all of the
data are low level.
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 REPRESENTATIVENESS OF OBSERVATIONS
                              261
      In comparison of the data, only wind directions are used,
 both because the height differences of the coastal stations are con-
 siderable, and because at least one of the anemometers in the
 inland group probably was defective.


 COASTAL STATIONS

      Figures 3 and 4 represent wind roses at the three coastal
 stations during winter and summer,  respectively.  Although the
 figures show a distinct seasonal change, the wind roses of the
                     y<
           *i.o*Y_         ( °-0% ]	
                       /r^
      Irookhaven, N. Y.
Wilmington, Del.
S. Norwalk, Conn.
          Figure 3. Coastal Sites, December/ January and February
                           0.0%
    /r
     Srookhaven, N.Y.
Wilmington, Del.
                                       S. Norwalk, Conn.
        10 19 20 %
             Figure 4. Coastal Sites, June, July and August
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
262                         SMITH

three stations are quite similar.   In the winter, each of them
shows a definite NW maximum with important contributions from
SW,  W, N, and NE as well, but none of the stations is  particularly
affected by winds ranging from E through S. In the summer wind
roses, Figure 4, similarities are also apparent,  although the
South Norwalk record shows a little more frequency of S and NW
winds as opposed to a south-westerly flow,  which is predominant
at Brookhaven and Delaware City.  The harbor orientation favors
a more southerly sea breeze at South Norwalk,  and a drainage
wind down a shallow valley at night contributes to the northwest-
erly maximum.
      Figures 3  and 4 show that calm winds (entered as percent
in the center of the circle) are exceedingly  rare at all stations.

INLAND HILLY  STATIONS
      Similar wind roses  for winter and summer are presented in
Figures 5 and 6  for the hilly inland stations: the direction distri-
bution for these  stations is shown to 16 rather than 8 points.  One
would be hard pressed to  identify these wind roses as coming from
the same general area of  the country.   The differences are marked,
with Dansville showing a strong tendency for NW-SE flow,  James-
town generally recording  winds from S through NW,  and Clean re-
flecting sharp peaks from the SW and E, especially in the summer.

      The Jamestown station shows a very high percentage of
calms, which may reflect a defective instrument,  since no other
reason is apparent.

      These marked differences cannot be explained on any gen-
eral meteorological grounds,  but the reasons for them become
clear on  inspection of terrain maps of the local areas,  Figures
7, 8 and  9.  Dansville, shown in Figure 7,  lies in a pronounced
NNW-SSE valley, which channels the flow very sharply.  Pre-
sumably  there would be a strong diurnal variation in this valley
with drainage winds from the SSE at night and up-valley winds
from the NNW in the daytime.  The map of  Olean,  Figure 8 shows
quite clearly the  reason for the predominance of east and west
winds at the site,  since the main configuration of the valley favors
such flow.  It is not obvious on a map of this scale, but closer
inspection of detail would show a sharp cut  directly south of the
station; presumably the strong tendency toward S winds represents
a drainage  wind down the  slope.  The map of Jamestown,  Figure 9,
is not quite so easy to interpret, since the  terrain features are
not as sharply marked as those of the other two sites.   Particularly,
the very high percentage of calms is difficult to explain, and for
this  reason it is thought that the anemometer may have been
defective.

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 REPRESENTATIVENESS OF  OBSERVATIONS
                                                                 263
                                     2.7%
Jamestown, N.Y.
                                   Clean, N.Y.        Dansville, N.Y
               Figure 5. Hilly Sites, December, January and February
      Jamestown, N.Y.             Clean, N.Y.
                                                 Dansville, N.Y.
                   Figure 6.  Hilly Sites, June, July and August
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
264
                                 SMITH
                    Figure 7.  Terrain map — Dansville,  N.Y.
                      Figure 8.  Terrain map — Olean, N.Y.




                                    SEC  TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 REPRESENTATIVENESS OF OBSERVATIONS
265
                  Figure 9. Terrain map — Jamestown, N.Y.
 CONCLUSIONS
      This brief review indicates that prospects for the use of
 existing meteorological data for air pollution studies are both
 encouraging and discouraging.  Essentially the  main conclusion of
 the study is that in each case that requires  data, the decision as
 to the means of acquiring it should  be made by a person familiar
 with micrometeorology.  If the terrain and  altitude considerations
 warrant it,  transfer of data among  similar  sites,  even over a
 fairly wide area, is a perfectly reasonable  procedure.   Certainly
 from a  site-survey point of view, the wind roses of Brookhaven,
 South Norwalk,  and Delaware City are substantially identical.
      On the other hand,  it seems equally clear that there is little
 point in devoting any  study  to data transfer  in rough terrain.  A
 careful  inspection and evaluation of the site may produce an
 estimate of  the wind distribution which would be superior to that
 obtained from a misguided  attempt  to transfer data.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
266                         SMITH

                         DISCUSSION

      PROFESSOR HEWSON:  There is one type of variable that
shows up in that Jamestown wind rose that I don't think you men-
tioned.  Is there not a possibility that  since the peaks in the wind
rose are from west, southwest, south, and so on,  and you had
minima in between these points -- may this not indicate a bias on
the part of the person who was reading the observations?  I
noticed this, and my interpretation was that it was perhaps easier
to write southwest or west rather than south southwest.

      MR.  SMITH:  I think that anyone who has ever done any
reading of such data would have to agree with you. This is one
of the points that I wanted to make really,  that when you select
information of this kind you accept the problems  as well as the
data.  I think any one of us will show a bias, particularly some-
one who isn't scientifically curious about it.  That certainly could
be what happened in that case.

      We performed a study on the problem  some time ago; we
had two girls read two full years of wind-speed data,  and they
were  to read this information to a tenth of a meter per second.
The records were perfectly satisfactory for this.   If you look
through the  data and make a frequency distribution, of course,
0. 5 and 0. 0 show up far more frequently than anything else. There
is no  question about it.

      MR. KALPERN:  What type of stations were these actually?
Were  they 24-hour observations?

      MR.  SMITH:  Yes,  they were.

      MR.  KALPERN:  Were  they Weather Bureau stations?

      MR.  SMITH:  They were Weather. Bureau stations or
Airways  stations.

      MR.  KALPERN:  What period of time ?

      MR.  SMITH:  The records I showed you covered a period of
two or three years.

      MR.  KALPERN:  How long ago?

      MR.  SMITH:  I think the earliest date was about 1956 and
the latest date was  very recent.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                           Present and Future Needs for
                                           Meteorological and Air Quality
                                           Observations in Canada*

                                           R. E.  MUNN, Meteorological Branch,
                                           Department of Transport, Canada
                   Summary

                         Air pollution meteorological data can-
                   not be assessed without knowledge of the  ob-
                   jectives of urban air pollution studies. A set
                   of objectives and requirements for meteorolog-
                   ical support  is outlined. Some typical Canadi-
                   an air pollution surveys  now in progress are
                   discussed. Field data  are assessed and rec-
                   ommendations made. The advantages  of na-
                   tional or international  uniformity in methods
                   of measuring, reporting,  and storing air pollu-
                   tion meteorological observations are  presented.
*To be published in full by the UNESCO Conference on Science and Technology for
 Underdeveloped Countries, Geneva,  February  1963.
                                          267

-------
                                  Problems Associated with Forecasting Air
                                  Pollution Over an Urban Area

                                  ERWIN K. KAUPER, Air Pollution Control
                                  District, County of Los Angeles
 Summary
     The need for a more specialized observational program scaled for air pollution
 studies is discussed in terms of the operational air pollution forecasting service in the
 Los Angeles Basin area of Southern California.
      Any air pollution study requires an accompanying body of
 meteorological data.  This holds true both for the simple survey
 that determines whether there is air'pollution,  and for the all-
 out effort of continuous measurement designed to detect pollutant
 levels and alert a community to the approach  of pre-determined
 danger levels.

      In none of these situations is one likely  to find the meteor-
 ological data in the form and at the location desired.  This is a
 characteristic of such data as presently gathered.   The location
 of weather stations and the type of observations reflect a preoccu-
 pation with aviation  problems.  In former days, agricultural
 interests received all the attention.   That was the period of empha-
 sis on temperature and precipitation reports gathered by a multi-
 tude of cooperative stations.  The city office was in its ascendency,
 although it served more as a climatological clearing house than a
 source of detailed weather  information about the city itself.
      The airport weather station has now replaced the city office
 at most urban centers.  What the study of air pollution needs,
 though, is a return to the city office, a city office that  conducts
 an observational  program geared to urban problems.
      In this paper,  we will discuss these problems in  the light of
 the forecasting program conducted by the Los Angeles  County Air
 Pollution Control District.
GENERAL DISCUSSION
      Instead of forecasting the general weather of whole states or
sections of the  country,  the Air Pollution Control  District concen-
trates on predicting the air pollution conditions over one coastal
basin.  Through inter-agency agreements,  Los Angeles County
provides meteorological forecast service to two of the three other
counties that  share the region included in the term, Los Angeles

-------
270                        KAUPER

Basin.  Altogether,  then, the forecast area encompasses about
2400 square miles,  running from the Pacific Ocean on the west
and south,  inland 77 miles to the fringing mountains to the east,
and 31 miles to the mountain boundary on the north.

      Beyond these mountains lie the California deserts that to-
gether with the Pacific Ocean control the ebb and flow of the air
over the Basin,  a transport mechanism that directs the movement
of the Los  Angeles  smog cloud from its first formation to its final
removal.

      The forecast  problem in this rather limited area basically
is the prediction of two meteorological conditions - the horizontal
wind flow and the stability of the air mass.  Knowledge of these
conditions  and of the amount of solar radiation that will be avail-
able at the  surface  should theoretically produce a good forecast
of the resulting air pollution situation.

      Some rather formidable obstacles stand in the way of the
achievement of such a perfect forecast.  These are,  as would be
expected, forms' of ignorance: ignorance regarding the future
meteorological doings of nature, and further,  ignorance of the
actual conditions that have led to smog attacks in the  past.

      In the latter situation,  the  air pollution forecaster finds him-
self in a position similar to that  of the early Weather Bureau men
who had to  make predictions without the benefit of an  understand-
ing afforded by the  frontal theory of storm formation  and growth.
This analogy applies specifically to the photochemical type of
smog.  To  the extent that low-level, mesoscale, meteorological
measurements are  not made synoptically with air quality measure-
ments,  it applies also to the air  pollution problem in  general.
PROBLEMS INVOLVING THE ATMOSPHERIC-CHEMICAL
REACTIONS
      The cause-effect relationship between hydrocarbon-produc-
ing sources and photochemical reactant products forming smog has
been firmly established since 1952 by Haagen-Smit.  The inter-
mediate steps in this reaction, the way variations in initial  pollu-
tion conditions may alter the course of the reaction, have re-
mained unknown, however. Within the past year, experiments
with large controlled-environment chambers have begun to  pro-
duce results that should increase our knowledge in this regard.
In the meantime back at the forecast office, the forecaster  is en-
deavoring to apply his knowledge of the reactions.  This is  most
difficult, to use as  colorless an understatement as possible, in
our uncontrolled natural atmospheric environment.
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 FORECASTING URBAN AIR POLLUTION                    271

      Experience has taught the Los Angeles smog forecasters
 that some of the most apparent smog attacks (apparent to the tax-
 paying citizens' sense of smell and sight) are not accompanied by
 correspondingly high concentrations of oxidants or ozone.   Other
 situations reveal the reverse - high concentrations of pollutants,
 but no noticeable smog.

      Then, too, there are differences in smog effects that de-
 pend on the particular section of the Basin that is involved.  For
 example, in downtown Los Angeles the eye-irritating properties
 of smog are most pronounced, but ozone values are relatively low.
 It is at outlying stations to the north and east that alert-level
 ozone values are usually measured.   In these suburbs eye irrita-
 tion may or may not accompany  the ozone.  Further east,  in San
 Bernardino and Riverside Counties,  elevated ozone or oxidant
 values may be recorded, but little or no eye irritation is noted.
 These high values have been accompanied by visibility observa-
 tions ranging  from 30 miles to 1/2 mile.

      Plant damage is another manifestation of air pollution on
 which the forecaster must give advice.  Here more unknowns ob-
 scure the forecaster's crystal ball.  Plant-damaging attacks of
 smog have been noted everywhere in the Basin and even across
 the fringing mountains in the Mojave Desert.  Apparently the con-
 centration of smog need not be very high to produce plant damage,
 since such effects are noted in areas  that so far have not reported
 eye irritation.
 THE OPERATIONAL FORECAST

      Operational forecasts by the Air Pollution Control District
 are designed for two general uses:  public and internal.  The
 latter is the information on which the air sampling operation is
 conducted, and probably closely resembles the type of service
 given any organization by its meteorological  supporting unit. The
 public  dissemination of smog forecasts is somewhat unusual and
 for that reason is more fully  discussed.
      The issuance of smog forecasts to the Los Angeles public
 began in 1952.   Originally the public release of these forecasts
 was made in order to educate.  Smog in its varying degrees of
 severity was not recognized by  the general public  as being mete-
 orologically controlled.  Rather it was thought that the source  of
 pollution varied in strength.   It was to combat this idea that the
 forecasts were issued,  always relating the expected pollution in
 terms of pertinent weather conditions. A secondary consideration
 involved in the issuance of a public forecast was the District s
 overloaded switchboard on bad days.  Complaints  came thick and


SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
272                        KAUPER

fast whenever the weeping-eyed populace could grope its way,  via
telephone dial, to the District's complaint desk.  The forecast, it
was hoped,  would cut out that portion of the public that  called just
to tell the District that it was smoggy.  If it was already in the
forecast, the reasoning went, they all could save their  telephone
message units.
      The air pollution forecast has been the basis for various
systems of limiting  emissions when poor dispersion conditions
were expected.  For example, open fires are not allowed in the
Los Angeles Basin,  with  but few exceptions.   These exceptions,
however, are also forbidden whenever stagnant air flow is fore-
cast.
      At one time, a voluntary system of restricted driving was
put into effect whenever bad smog was anticipated.   This took the
form of a request that no unnecessary driving be done on smoggy
days.  Since no one, it turned out, did any unnecessary driving,
this use  of the  forecast could not  be considered a huge success.
However, there is evidence that on days forecast to be  smoggy,
fewer than the  usual number of shoppers came into town.   At least,
that is the complaint from the downtown merchants'  association.
      During the  cool portion of the year,  when the electricity-
generating steam  plants are normally burning fuel oil rather than
natural gas,  the forecast is used  to cause these plants to switch
to gas when an air pollution attack is  expected.  This takes the
combined efforts of  the power-generating systems and the  gas
companies.   Gas, being in  great demand for domestic use  in
winter, is provided  to industry on an  as-available basis.  When
the fuel-switch forecast is  made,  the gas  companies have to de-
pend on their storage facilities to provide service to all.  For-
tunately  heavy smog attacks,  while they occur in winter, do not
last very long - usually only a day or two.

      A major segment of the air sampling activity of the District
is that done in response to  the legally required monitoring service.
Various  pollutants,  known to have toxic effects,  are constantly
watched  through use of automatic recording instruments.   A sys-
tem of warning levels  has been established.  The first alert level
is in the nature of a preliminary warning.  Industries are notified
to prepare for possible shutdown, if the pollution level  goes higher.
A second-stage alert triggers the shutdown procedure.  If third-
stage conditions are encountered, then concentrations are such
that a danger to the  public health  exists and the emergency powers
of the State  Governor come into play.

      The meteorologist  is involved in this alert procedure be-
cause pollution levels  exceeding the alert criteria may  occur at
any station in the  Basin.  He is then asked to predict how long the

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 FORECASTING URBAN AIR POLLUTION                    273

 values will remain high, to what maximum they will go, and
 finally, what other stations may be expected to measure high con-
 centrations of this pollutant.

       If the meteorologist knew for the entire area the wind flow
 pattern and the depth of the polluted layer, then he would be able
 to answer these questions successfully.  Since he doesn't know
 these  things precisely, he  does the best guessing he can.  Cer-
 tainly some type of telemetering  system, both for meteorological
 and air monitoring data,  would be very useful here.
       Obtaining the depth of the polluted air - a sounding - pre-
 sents  one of the more important difficulties.   At the present stage
 of technology the best that can be done is to obtain more frequent
 temperature soundings by balloons or other airborne equipment.
 What is really needed is an instrumented tower about a mile high,
 but that does  seem a bit impractical even for California.  Three-
 hundred-foot  towers, as used elsewhere, would not meet the need
 in Los Angeles because the restraining inversion base is as much
 as  1000 feet or more even on the  worst smog days.
 FORECASTING WEATHER PATTERNS
 CONDUCIVE TO SMOG
      Turning to the strictly meteorological portion of the fore-
 cast problem,  one discovers the same lack of basic knowledge of
 the existing large-scale weather conditions that exists regarding
 the very local conditions associated with pollution concentrations.
 For a forecast of the Los Angeles  smog conditions 24 to 36 hours
 in the future,  it is necessary to consider past and current weather
 patterns and how they are changing.  The basic charts used to ob-
 tain this picture are those for 500  and  850  millibars and the cor-
 responding surface chart.
      Since upper-air charts are made only every 12 hours, with
 considerable space between network stations,  the  forecaster is
 severely limited in his efforts to extrapolate.  This would not be
 such a problem if we were dealing with dominant features of a
 weather map - the deep lows and the prominant highs - but air
 pollution is a child of weak weather systems.  These are often
 barely detectable, even after the fact.  Any changes at all in con-
 ditions either  at the surface or aloft, may be important to the
 forecast.  With present weather observing  schedules, these subtle
 changes are almost bound to be noted too late to do any good.
      In an effort  to detect small changes in weather conditions
 the Los Angeles forecaster resorts to a close watch of surface
 pressure gradients between coastal and inland stations.  Generally,
 an increasing  onshore gradient results in a rising inversion and

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
274                        KAUPER

a lessening of the  smog.  An increasing offshore gradient usually
indicates the reverse, until  the change is too boisterous.  In this
latter situation, the air mass lying on the desert side of the moun-
tains bursts its bounds and sweeps down over the coast.  This is
the "Santa  Ana",  a wind that carries the smog far out to sea  and
in certain sections is strong enough to  carry off part of the real
estate as well.
     The forecaster feels most confident about his forecast  for
the occurrence of  smog when the pressure gradients are near
zero and show no great change during the preceding hours.  The-
oretically,  the low-level wind flow that is responsible for the
accumulation and subsequent movement of smog is caused by these
pressure gradients.  When strong gradients exist, this  relation-
ship of pressure and wind flow is evident.  But with weak gradi-
ents the winds appear to be uninhibited by such theoretical con-
siderations.  It must be assumed that even in this situation the
wind does indeed flow from high- to low-pressure areas.  The
apparent contradictions encountered must be the result  of inac-
curate  or imprecise pressure measurement.

     Even in the low-lying coastal area of the Los Angeles Basin,
the first-order weather stations (military and Weather Bureau)
sometimes report as much as one, and often as much as one-half,
millibar difference in pressure between stations only 6  miles
apart.   This,  it would seem,  represents a basic inaccuracy in
pressure readings at one or the other station. A thorough check
on pressure-observing practices seems indicated so that this un-
certainty can be minimized.

     Even with these more obvious errors in pressure readings
corrected,  there still remains the problem of preciseness.  In a
situation of weak gradients, it is not at all unlikely that definite
wind flows  will develop,  indicating a response to some gradient,
weak as it  seems to be.  Possibly, a more refined pressure  ob-
servation network, refined both from the standpoint of instrumen-
tation and geographical spacing, would reveal the cause of the
observed wind flows.
UNTAPPED SOURCES OF WEATHER DATA
      One possibility of getting an enlarged picture of the basic
pressure patterns is to utilize temperature.  Temperature is re-
lated to pressure and there are many more temperature than
pressure observations available for study.
      In the Los Angeles Basin, in addition to the regular network
of meteorological stations, there are a great number of locations
at which temperature is measured.   Within the past several years

                              SEC  TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 FORECASTING URBAN AIR POLLUTION                    275

 it has become fashionable for commercial concerns to display tem-
 perature readings on lighted  signs.  Preliminary reconnaissance
 indicates that as a whole these thermometers have a rather uni-
 form exposure.   They are usually mounted on the roof of a one-
 story building in a louvered "birdhouse".   The indicators are
 visible both from the street and inside.  Telephoned in to a fore-
 cast office, these temperature reports would provide a basis for
 analyzing the existing temperature field.  A  series of hourly ob-
 servations would show the change of temperature with time.
 Hopefully,  these data could be correlated with the various types
 of morning air flows found in the Los Angeles Basin.
      This is one method of trying to achieve full utilization of
 existing meteorological  data.   Any study in depth of a geographical
 area such as the Los Angeles Basin will uncover an unsuspected
 number of meteorological data gathering organizations.  Much
 information could be made available  to interested parties provided
 some means could be found for communication.   No one  organiza-
 tion appears able to afford the monetary and  labor costs of setting
 up and running such a local meteorological network.  A proposal
 for such a  system, in which mesoscale analyses would be per-
 formed at a local analysis center,  has been recently made by
 Todd.
 SUMMARY
      Problems facing the air pollution forecaster, as seen from
 the midst of the Los Angeles  smog cloud, fall into two categories.
 These involve the lack of knowledge of, (1) the pollution reaction
 itself, and (2) the meteorological variations.

      The first is being worked on by air pollution chemists and
 thus is outside the province of meteorologists.  The second,
 though, must be faced by the  meteorological profession.  An in-
 creased emphasis must be placed on measuring the atmosphere on
 a scale suitable to the air pollution problem.  This includes not
 only a relocation of observational sites back into the cities but also
 an increase in the density of the weather-reporting network sur-
 rounding a city.  It further includes making the proper  kinds of
 meteorological measurements.
      Once this basic meteorological data is available the fore-
 casters of air pollution may have some hope of success in pre-
 dieting precisely the extent and duration of a srnog episode.  It is
 conceivable that, if necessary,  the future air  pollution forecast
 may be used to save lives even as flood and severe weather fore-
 casts do presently.
SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
276                       .KAUPER

                         DISCUSSION

      MR.  WILLIAMS:  What has the batting average been on pre-
dicting smog?
      MR.  KAUPER: You can always get an 80 percent accuracy
if you manipulate right.  But we do a monthly verification on var-
ious parts  of our forecast, and our verification ranges between 60
and 70 percent most of the time.

      MR.  LICHTBLAU:  I feel that I have to say a few words in
defense of  the Weather Bureau.  Thirty years ago we were under
somewhat different circumstances, and practically all  of our sta-
tions were at urban locations.  I think that we have as  many urban
stations at the  present time as we had 30 years ago,  but we also
have many, many airport stations that did not exist 30  years ago.
So that is the way the picture has changed.  And probably we will
get more urban stations  as time progresses.

      You mentioned about the pressure observations.  It is un-
fortunate that these inaccuracies do exist and we will try to cor-
rect this situation.  But  there  are many agencies involved, such
as the military, the CAA, and the FAA, and sometimes it is rather
difficult to get  uniform measurements.

      There are a couple of other remarks I would like to make.
I just wanted to state for the record that meteorologists are cer-
tainly interested in morbidity and health.  Otherwise there would
be no reason for our existence.

      Yesterday the question was asked about how long it would
take for Weather Bureau people to make air pollution forecasts.
I think the  figure was given as 45 minutes or an hour.  At a
Weather Bureau Forecast  Center the forecaster on duty often does
make informed air pollution forecasts.  At certain times of the
year the city piles up the collected trash instead of burning it
every day as they usually do.  Then the fire department will call
us and ask, "Can we burn  our  trash today,  or shall we burn it
tomorrow? " And usually we can tell them within a minute or two
whether they should burn it today or tomorrow.

      DR.  HEWSON:  In  1949 a paper was published by Dr. Jones
in  which certain rules and definitions of chemistry were set forth.
It was  indicated that these should be used in air pollution fore-
casts.  Have these rules been  proved to be of value when used
over a long period of time?

      MR.  KAUPER: The  answer is  that we don't use those rules.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
                                    The Need for More Meaningful Meteorological
                                    and Air Quality Observations for Mortality
                                    and Morbidity Studies

                                    F. FIELD, Albert Einstein College of
                                    Medicine of Yeshiva University

                                    J. K. McGUIRE, Office of Climatology
                                    United States Weather Bweau
 Summary
     The relationships between air pollution, meteorology, morbidity, and mortality are
 being studied in many countries, especially Great Britain and the United States.  These
 studies show that more meaningful meteorological and air pollution data must be devel-
 oped. Relating air pollution to health effects is difficult because the network of record-
 ing stations  is sparse and because not enough is known about the diffusion, dispersion,
 and concentration of pollutants in the atmosphere of urban areas.  Difficulties encoun-
 tered in health studies of this type are discussed, and the need for descriptive meteor-
 ological and  air pollution data is indicated.
       The existing information concerning the effects of toxic
 substances upon animals and man is considerable and is derived
 mainly from laboratory investigations  and industrial exposure
 studies.   These data generally are concerned with above-normal
 concentrations and as a rule,  though not always, with acute ef-
 fects.  It is from these data that the industrial hygienists derive
 the terms "maximum allowable concentration" and "lethal dose. "

       In  considering the problem of air pollution,  however,  we
 are  interested not only in the effects on man  of the above-normal
 concentrations that may occur at times,  but also in the effects
 of the levels of air pollution to which he  is subject during the
 course of his daily life.

       The chief characteristics  of air pollution are that it is
 generally low in concentration and long in duration of exposure.
 Air  pollution varies temporally and  spatially in  a  given geograph-
 ical area and also differs from area to area.   These character-
 istics make it  exceedingly difficult to arrive at meaningful average
 values of air pollution over a long period of time.
       Moreover, the residents of urban areas,  who are exposed
 to the effects  of air pollution during their lifetimes, have great
 mobility.  A person employed in a section  of the city where he is
 exposed during an 8-hour day to high levels of air pollution may
reside in a relatively non-polluted suburban  atmosphere.  Another
person in the course  of changes of employment may be subject to

                                  277

-------
278                  FIELD AND McGUIRE

various levels of air pollution.  This mobility in a population adds
to the difficulty of  evaluating the effects of air pollution.

      Three approaches may be used to relate air pollution to
health.  The first is to study man in the laboratory in experimen-
tal fashion.  Despite moral and legal implications,  volunteer work
with human subjects has produced some basic information.   But
this type  of experimentation has of necessity been limited.  We do
not reject this direct approach -- it is  the soundest physical at-
tack on the problem -- but by its very nature this work must ad-
vance slowly and cautiously.

      The second source of information is the controlled exposure
of animals in laboratories  to various concentrations and combina-
tions of air pollution and meteorological factors.  Much knowledge
concerning physiological changes has been gained this way, but
carrying over the results of these experiments to human beings
is difficult.

      The third method of  evaluating the influence of air pollution
and meteorology upon morbidity and mortality is to study man in
his normal environment. This is the epidemiologic approach in
which we are working, under the direction of  Dr.  Leonard Green-
burg,  at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine with support by
the U.S.  Public Health Service. We are grateful indeed for being
permitted to attend this meeting and express our thoughts on the
matter.

       The epidemiologic method consists of a study of the con-
ditions in a  population, the distribution of these conditions, and
the factors that lead to such a distribution.  The condition to
which we  refer is  the health status of the individual, which in-
cludes susceptibility to disease, illness, or death.  The factors
that influence these conditions and with which we are concerned
are the contaminants in the atmosphere and the meteorological
variations.

       Among the questions which we  may ask are:  Does exposure
to normally low concentrations in the air cause direct impairment
of health?  Does such low  level exposure make the individual
prone to  infection?  How important are the predisposing conditions
or susceptibility of the individual when he is exposed to low levels
or acute  periods of air pollution ?  What is the combined effect of
weather and air pollution on the health of New York  City residents?

       The several sources from which morbidity data may be ob-
tained include the  records of emergency clinics,  hospital admis-
sions and discharges,  union and group medical plans,  civil
service groups, private physicians, and clinics.  The problems
                                SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
 MEANINGFUL DATA FOR HEALTH STUDIES                279

 of differential diagnosis enter into the collection of such infor-
 mation,  and we would not like to mislead you into thinking that
 morbidity statistics are clear cut.

      Absenteeism and  illnesses records are available from
 large business firms, but in our experience they have been  found
 to be influenced by too many external factors to be of value.

      Mortality information, on the other hand, provides more
 definitive numbers, which include precise times of occurrence
 and cause.  We are fortunate in New York City that the Depart-
 ment of Health's Bureau of Statistics,  under the  direction of Dr.
 Carl Erhardt,  has for the past 15 years compiled mortality data
 by  date of death and has recorded these on punch cards.  These
 are two invaluable assets in our study.   Only New York City,
 Chicago,  and Los Angeles, we are reliably informed, report
 mortality by date of death. *  Everywhere else the data are by
 date of report of death or grouped by week or month.  Date  of the
 report of death may be any time up to several days afterwards.
 This uncertain time element seriously weakens any attempted
 correlation with air pollution and weather.

      Turning now to air pollution and  weather, the epidemiologist
 asks:  What indices may we use to represent the  air pollution and
 weather to which an individual is exposed?  What liberties may
 we  take with the  data collected by monitoring,  sampling,  and
 meteorological measurements in order to make such data usable
 in our intended statistical analyses?  For through these statis-
 tical associations we will be able to develop hypotheses concerning
 the etiological factors and test the hypotheses  developed in clinic
 or laboratory.

      Air pollution may be considered  as an independent variable,
 subject only to the magnitude of its sources.  On the other hand,
 air pollution is conveyed by the atmosphere, so that it is a de-
 pendent variable with respect to meteorological conditions.  The
 body of knowledge that has accumulated in recent years on the
 subject of air pollution has already given satisfactory evidence of
 the qualitative relationships between weather  parameters and air
 pollution levels in the atmosphere.
      But from this point on our information is weak.  The more
 detailed knowledge of the atmospheric  structure over given cities,
 parts of cities, given urban or rural localities -- this knowledge
 plus knowledge of the effects of such small-scale atmospheric
 conditions  in varying the dispersion and diffusion of pollutants  is
 still to be acquired.
      We have become very  much aware in our epidemiological
 studies in New York City of the lack of information regarding the

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
280                  FIELD AND McGUIRE

variability of both air pollution and meteorology,  not only spatial-
ly in the horizontal and vertical,  but also chronologically.  This
variability points up one of our problems:  how to obtain valid in-
dices for the  contaminants that may be present in the atmosphere.

      We would like to offer an example  of a valid index.  In a
survey designed to investigate the relationship between the prev-
alence of pneumoconiosis  and dust exposure in coal mines, we
might  define the exposure to the air pollutant as the concentra-
tion of dust times the length of exposure.  If the concentration
were measured at one end of the coal shaft,  our dust exposure
would  be invalid.  First,  the concentrations which were measured
could not be assumed to be the  same as those that had existed in
the past and that may have produced the  disease.  Second, in the
course of employment in the mines, the  men would probably have
worked in other parts of the mine where the measurements taken
would  not be applicable.  Lastly,  the dust measurements may
prove  to be irrelevant in such a study because such dust measure-
ments  in terms of weight are unduly influenced by the larger
particles,  which do not enter the  lung at all.

      A valid  index is therefore one that measures what it is  in-
tended to measure, and it can be  judged  only in the light of pre-
vious knowledge and investigations.
      What then is a valid index of air pollution that the  epidemio-
logist  may employ in his  study  of health  effects ?

      How valid are the air pollution data that the epidemiologist
has at  his command ?  At the outset it should be noted that pol-
lutant  measurements are often  taken 15 feet above street level.
If the object of the sampling network is to meet some specific
need,  however, then the station locations are adjusted to the
particular requirements of the  study.   Few sampling stations
have been established primarily for the purpose of gathering data
for epidemiological studies.   It should also be noted that the great
variety of sampling and analytical techniques makes it difficult to
compare or interpret air quality data  collected from different
sources.

      Although the measurement of air pollution levels has pro-
gressed rapidly in the past few years  and continuous monitoring
is now possible,  the air pollution levels  reported in our cities are
generally estimates based upon readings taken at one or two sta-
tions.   We are therefore in a rather precarious position as to the
significance and interpretation  of the air quality readings now
available.  We must ask just how much of an area, both horizont-
ally and vertically, these numbers represent.  The  question of
chronology arises also,  since  in many instances the readings are
not continuous.

                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MEANINGFUL DATA FOR HEALTH STUDIES                281

      For example, data on the levels of various air pollutants
are collected in the City of New York, where we are fortunate in-
deed to have a growing Department of Air Pollution Control.  This
department has  established a series of stations about the city to
provide continuous information on smoke shade.  Since we are
dealing with a collection of morbidity and mortality statistics
drawn from various section's of New York City, we are interested
in ascertaining the variability of the records from these stations.

      An analysis of variance was carried out for four of these
stations, with the following interesting results:

      1. The four stations differ significantly  in their absolute
levels with a P value of less than 0. 001.  We had of course ex-
pected variations  between the stations and thought that possibly
these variations between all of the stations might not prove sig-
nificant, but this was not  the case.

      2. The two stations located at the Department of Air Pollu-
tion Control Laboratory at the 59th St. Bridge  report significant-
ly higher readings than the stations at Central  Park in midtown
and Brooklyn Tech High School,  which is located in the borough of
Brooklyn.  The  distances  between the four stations are approxi-
mately 10 to 15  miles.

      3. There is a significant difference in the smoke shade
readings for different days of the month.

      The purpose of our analysis was to enable us to determine
whether one  station might possibly be utilized to give us a repre-
sentative reading  for the city as a whole,  or whether some mathe-
matical manipulation might give us an index.  It appears  offhand
that we cannot presume to use one station for such a purpose; the
analysis also emphasized  the question of just how much of an area
each of our current stations represents.

      Similar to the problem encountered in smoke shade is  the
preliminary comparison of the carbon monoxide readings measured
in New York City.   Continuous observations are made at two sta-
tions:  the Department  of Air Pollution Control Laboratory at 121st
Street and the station at the 59th Street Bridge.  The following in-
formation was obtained through a statistical analysis:
      1.  The absolute  levels of carbon monoxide differ signifi-
cantly for the two recording stations.  As might be expected, the
values registered at the Bridge are as much as 5 times higher
than those at the laboratory.
      2  The range of  concentrations is much  greater at the
Bridge, as might  be expected also, because of the proximity and
density of traffic.   The onset of high levels of carbon monoxide

SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
282                 FIELD AND Me GUI RE

starts earlier and the high levels last for a longer period of time
at the Bridge.
      In comparing these two stations we allow for the fact that
the laboratory measurements are made 20 feet above street level,
while those at the Bridge are recorded at the ramp near street
level.
      But before  we can make any assumptions or simplifications
in working with carbon  monoxide, we  must have a better picture
of the distribution of this fugitive gas.   What index can we use
with carbon monoxide?   Is it possible to measure this pollutant at
some level in the lower atmosphere that may provide a reading
applicable for health studies and yet be  free from the undue in-
fluence of the source?  These are the data we sorely need.
      The question of whether carbon  monoxide has any ill  effects
at chronic low levels has been reopened recently. European in-
vestigators are of an affirmative mind.   But since our knowledge
of the distribution of carbon monoxide in urban air is incomplete,
it is difficult to infer the  effects upon  individuals. Sampling of
carbon monoxide at street levels has disclosed values as high  as
100 ppm, depending upon density of traffic and meteorological
conditions.   The validity of our carbon monoxide readings must
be probed further.

      To this point our  discussion has been concerned with the
location of sampling stations.   We have pointed out the lack of
standardization in the collection and analysis of data.  Before  we
can truly  judge the validity of the numbers we are collecting and
use them  more meaningfully, we must improve and standardize
the basic  methods of measurement.

      We  find a weakness also in our knowledge concerning the
interactions between pollutants in the  atmosphere and the inter-
actions between pollutants and weather  elements. Observational
and experimental evidence indicates that the toxic effect of carbon
monoxide, a pollutant,  is enhanced by higher temperature, a
meteorological element.  Or in reverse,  the loss of biologically
active ultraviolet radiation,  a meteorological element, is brought
about by increasing air pollution.  It is  also possible that the
direct relationships we seek do not exist, but instead synergistic
reactions between pollutants and weather may play a serious role.

      A recent statistical investigation  by Holland indicates that
both atmospheric pollution and  low temperature have an effect on
acute respiratory admissions to London hospitals.  In this study
it was not possible to decide which had  the greatest effect, the
temperature or the air pollution, or the combination. 3
                               SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5
                                                      GPO 82511 1-10

-------
MEANINGFUL DATA FOR HEALTH STUDIES                283

      The interactions of the various substances in the air must
be determined in order to study more specific forms of illness.
We must investigate  further the role played by weather in trans-
forming or altering pollutants in the photochemical reactions, in
the absorption of gases and vapors on particulate material, and in
catalytic oxidations and other chemical and physical changes.

      As for the variable of  meteorology itself,  the effect of
weather has been the subject of intensive investigation in European
countries and to a much lesser degree in this country.  Physio-
logical  studies have been carried out on high and low temperatures,
temperature and humidity combinations, high and low barometric
pressure, and other  meteorological  elements.

      Extreme weather conditions,  such as severe and prolonged
heat waves, have been shown to increase mortality.   This has
been demonstrated for our area of interest by Kutschenreuter. ^

      Human bioclimatology is  a vast and  largely uncharted field.
We can only hope that the  forecast made by Dr.  H.  E. Landsberg
will come true:

      "The greatest advances of climatology are destined
      to lie in the  border field of biology,  provided an
      adequate cooperative research program is started.
      The interactions between the physical changes in
      the atmosphere and  living organisms are too great a
      challenge to scientific curiosity to remain in a
      relatively unexplored state.

      In this area  we are again fortunate,  since in New York
City we have abundant data from the U. S.  Weather Bureau.  In or
near the city we have hourly surface weather observations from
four locations:  Central Park, LaGuardia  Field, New York Inter-
national Airport, and Newark Airport.  We have more data, though
less detailed, from the Bureau's cooperative climatological net-
work of about 30 stations.   We  even have an upper-air sounding
record, from N.  Y.  International Airport, so we have low-level
inversion data, etc.
      Researchers in other areas may not  be so fortunate.  Most
cities have only one Weather Bureau station, usually at an airport,
away from the  population from  which the morbidity and mortality
data are derived.   The network of atmospheric sounding stations,
adding the necessary third dimension,  is much sparser than the
network of surface weather observations.   In short, there is a
problem in the availability of the meteorological information.
Beyond  this,  we need more research on urban microclimatology
- the variations of climate between, for example, the airport
SYMPOSIUM: AIR OVER CITIES

-------
284                  FIELD AND McGUIRE

where the meteorological data come from and the various parts of
the city where the people live and die.  We need more research-
on the structure of the lower atmosphere over our cities, with
respect to both turbulence and microclimatology.  As  Wexler has
mentioned,  the routine meteorological data  are not suitable for
short-term  time and spatial studies of air pollution. °
      But even the possession of abundant routine data poses its
own problems.  One of the first questions we had to settle in our
study was whether we might use the meteorological observations
from ore  station to correlate with the mortality data for the city
as a whole.   We were dealing with a population of 8 million in an
area of 365  square  miles.   The residents are living in environ-
ments ranging from semi-suburbs to stone canyons, in a climate
where,  for example,-' sea breezes may be cooling Staten  Island,
Lower Manhattan, and southern Brooklyn and Queens,  while the
residents of the  Bronx,  Upper Manhattan, and the rest of Queens
and  Brooklyn  are sweltering in the heat.
      With the assistance of the Weather Bureau's National
Weather Record Center, we compared a year's series of hourly
temperature,  pressure, humidity, and wind observations from
the four locations previously mentioned, plus Battery Place, the
former site of the Weather  Bureau City Office.  We found that the
data from the five stations vary significantly with regard to ab-
solute values, but that with regard to changes in the values the
differences  were not meteorologically important.  In short, there
was a spatial  but not a chronological difference.  This result was
satisfactory,  since it was the frequency and magnitude of the
weather changes that we felt all along represented the  best key
to the interpretation of the mortality data.   There is too much
uncertainty  about the applicability of the values of the elements to
do much with  the absolute values except in terms of large depar-
tures from "normal. "

      While  our experience has been confined to New York City
data, we believe that the same needs apply elsewhere, not only
in urban areas but in rural as well.  Therefore, before summariz-
ing the foregoing in the form of conclusions  as to present and
future needs for meteorological and air quality observations, we
must consider the important phase of rural  investigations that we
have so far not mentioned.  These needs are just as important as
those we have cited for cities.  Much of what we have said applies
to rural areas, so we need not repeat ourselves.   We do want to
bring out a few important points.

      The first is the comparative lack of knowledge about rural
environments  as regards the atmospheric,  the air pollution,  and
the medical information required.  Weather Bureau stations are

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MEANINGFUL DATA FOR HEALTH STUDIES                285

near or in the population centers; except for military airfields,
climatological information in the rural areas is limited to the
temperature and precipitation reports of the Weather Bureau's
cooperative observers.  The stations of the solar radiation ob-
servation network are mainly in urban areas.  There is a need
for more observations of solar radiation, surface winds,  and
low-level inversions from the rural areas.  There is an equal
need for more air quality observations from such areas.  And,
just as the morbidity and mortality data for our cities need to
be improved and systematized,  so  do the same data for non-urban
locations.

      There are several factors that support the foregoing state-
ments in terms  of the needs of human bioclimatology.  First, we
should have some idea of the ordinary air pollution levels away
from  the major  sources, in  order  to find out what our supposedly
healthier country cousins  are breathing and to  compare their
medical histories with those  of us  who gasp in  the big  cities.

      Secondly,  before we can decide how urban climates modify
air pollution and how air pollution  modifies urban climates,  we
should know more about non-urban climates and microclimates.
For example, how are we to  compare New Yorkers with the
Westchester suburbanites and the Suffolk County farmers ?

      Thirdly, we know  that reduction of solar radiation is  an
important health aspect  of city climate and air pollution;  and we
know  that solar  radiation itself is a major  factor in certain forms
of morbidity.

      Finally, we know that  agricultural research specialists are
becoming increasingly concerned about the effects of air  pollu-
tion on plants and animals.  We  know,  too,  that agricultural
meteorology and agricultural climatology are experiencing a
renaissance in many sections of our country,  thanks to the
cooperation of the U. S. Weather Bureau and State Agricultural
Experiment Stations.
      We  suggest that we need the  help of the agricultural in-
terests,  and they need ours.  For  example, in the Midwest anet-
work  of Model Agricultural Weather Stations has been proposed.
and some have been established.  Shouldn't these include  air
quality observations?  Also,  shouldn't more meteorological sta-
tions  everywhere have air sampling instruments and vice versa?
Conclusions:
      The following are the conclusions at which we have arrived:

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
286                  FIELD AND McGUIRE

      1.  We need better morbidity and mortality data,  and more
laboratory investigations,  to assess the physiological meaning of
our meteorological and air quality observations.

      2.  We need to standardize the sampling and analytical
techniques for continuous air monitoring to match the rather high
degree of standardization that exists in the meteorological obser-
vations.
      3.  We need more joint meteorological and  air sampling
stations in cities and  towns and  in rural areas.
      4.  We need to have these stations, primarily the rural
ones, instrumented to furnish more information on surface winds,
low-level atmospheric conditions, and solar radiation.

      5.  We need to encourage  and  support the U. S. Weather
Bureau so that more observations of the weather  and climate  can
be made in the places where the people live, in addition to where
the airplanes take off and land.

      6.  We need research on the meteorological and air quality
data to translate them into models for obtaining meaningful indices
of air pollution that may be interpreted in terms of health, both
                         7 Q
in urban  and rural areas. '< °
      7.  We need more cooperation and more teamwork from
everybody -- the general  public; the local,  state,  and federal
medical,  public health, meteorological and climatological,
agricultural and industrial organizations --to obtain the obser-
vations needed and to achieve the goal the Surgeon-General has
defined:  "To determine the conditions under which toxic substan-
ces in the community atmosphere affect human health adversely,
and the measures which must be applied to prevent adverse
effects. "9
                       REFERENCES

1.  Dr. Richard Prindle,  personal communication.
2.  Castrop,  V. J.,  Stephans,  J.  F.,  and Patty,  F. A.,  "A
      Comparison of Carbon Monoxide Concentrations in Detroit
      and Los Angeles," Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc.  Quart., vol. 16,
      1955,  p.  225.
3.  Holland,  W. W., Spicer, C.  C., and Wilson, J. M.  G.,  "in-
      fluence of the weather  on respiratory and heart disease, "
      Lancet (London). Vol. 2,  No.  7198, August 12,  1961,  p. 338.
4.  Kutschenreuter,  P. H.,  "A study  of the effect of weather on
      mortality in New York City, " M. S. Thesis,  Rutgers U.,
      January 1960.

                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT  A62-5

-------
 MEANINGFUL DATA FOR HEALTH STUDIES                287

 5.  Landsberg,  H. E.,  "Trends in climatology, " Science,  Vol.
      128, No. 3327 (Oct.  3,  1958), pp. 749-758.
 6.  Wexler,  H.,  "The role of meteorology in air pollution, " in
      Air Pollution,  World Meteorological Organization (Colum-
      bia University Press, 1961) pp.  49-61.
 7.  Karplus, W.  J., Berkey,  G.  A., and Pehrul, P.  J.,  "At-
      mospheric diffusion of air pollutants, Analog  computer
      study,  " Ind.  Eng. Chem.,  Vol.  50 (Nov.. 1958), pp.  1657-
      1660.
 8.  Vaughan, L.  M.,  "The prediction  of atmospheric diffusion by
      using an eddy diffusivity based on the vertical transfer of
      heat, " Journal of  Meteorology, Vol. 18, No.  1  (Feb.  1961),
      pp. 43-49.
 9.  Burney,  L.  E., "Status Report to  the Nation, " Proceedings
      National Conference on Air Pollution,  Washington, D.  C.,
      Nov. 18-20,  1958, U.S. Dept of Health, Education and
      Welfare, PHS 1959, pg. 3.
                         DISCUSSION

      DR.  LODGE:  What specifically, do you mean by measuring
air pollution?  Air pollution is an abstract concept.  You can't
measure everything in the air.  This is some thousands of sub-
stances.

      DR.  FIELD: Well,  let us put it this  way,  then;  there are
many air pollutants.   We are interested in a certain number of
pollutants.  Let's take,  for example, carbon monoxide.  We are
interested  in the effects upon health.  We feel that air pollution,
while it may change the weather pattern, may bring the tempera-
ture up in our cities,  may increase rainfall.  All these are excellent
research projects which we highly subscribe to, but what we are
interested  in is trying to learn what  happens to a population such
as that of New  York City,  when the amount of sulfur dioxide in
the atmosphere rises  to a certain level.  What is the effect on
respiratory disease?  Does this in any way affect  morbidity?
Does this in any way hospitalize people?
      What we  require are more adequate measures of sulfur
dioxide that will tell us what these readings do mean in terms of
area and population effects.   Right now we  are at a loss.  We  have
five or six stations that we compare  and we find that they vary
greatly.  Since we would like to compare any change in specific
pollutants as they are  measured now, carbon monoxide,  sulfur
dioxide  etc.  we would like to know just how much of an area these
pollutants actually embrace,  what mortality and morbidity data

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER CITIES

-------
288                 FIELD AND McGUIRE

must we  confine ourselves to.  For example, it has been mentioned
that stagnation,  large high-pressure systems moving into an
area,  will create certain stability, inversions,  and all the weak
wind patterns that go along with this, and that this would increase
air pollution.
      Well,  taking our cue from  such a meteorological incident,
which occurred in New York City in 1953,  we went back into the
records and studied the mortality during this period of air pollu-
tion and compared it to similar periods  during  3 years prior and
3 years subsequent to the incident.  At that time the only pollu-
tion data we had as a measure were smoke shade and sulfur diox-
ide collected at one  station.  Despite the fact that this was a gross
air pollution estimate, we were able to define a striking increase,
which proved to be  statistically significant in the number of
deaths in New York  City.
      DR. LODGE:  In a more precise study, though, do you feel
that you will uniquely characterize sulfur dioxide intoxication by
a knowledge of sulfur dioxide  pollution?
      DR. FIELD:  Yes, I would say so.  There are different
ways of grading the  effects on human physiology of these various
pollutants.  This would be more  of a laboratory type of approach.

      I had mentioned to Dr. Landsberg that the Russians, for ex-
ample, in setting up maximum permissible levels,  will test an
individual through visual stimuli.  They will seat an individual in
a chamber,  subject  him  to certain  stimulus of light or other stim-
uli, and introduce at the same time an amount of gaseous material
into the  room  at extremely  low levels.  They keep testing on
this basis until they find out at what level these various incre-
ments, these various changes take place.  Then they will remove
the initial visual stimulus, after the  subject has been conditioned
and introduce the secondary effect  at lower and lower levels and
find the threshold where he no longer feels or elicits a response.
There are various ways  of grading this.

      Now,  we feel that respiratory disease and sulfur dioxide go
hand in hand.  We would like very much to be able to correlate
the two,  but when we find that the measurements are made com-
pletely differently from city to city and techniques vary so great-
ly, that the  measurements are made at stations which are arbi-
trarily set up at certain areas,  without any regard to representa-
tion, I don't feel that such pollution data are adequate for our use.
I was  curious when I asked the question  before  about the oxide,
whether  somebody actually went  out and did some surveys and
then decided this was a fairly representative area,  unaffected by
local sources that would contribute in any way to the change.


                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5

-------
MEANINGFUL DATA FOR HEALTH STUDIES                289

After all, we are dealing with the numbers that you provide us
for health studies and these numbers at this point are not satis-
factory for our purpose.

      MR.  STERN:  I would like to commend to Dr. Field the
series of papers discussing sampling station density and place-
ment,  as a result of the Nashville study.  There  the city was
literally saturated with sampling points in order  to determine the
necessary number and location of sampling points.  And I think
the Nashville data in the series of papers that have been published
go a long way to answer some of the questions you have raised as
to the meaning of any one  station with relation to others in a net-
work,  and how many are needed to characterize it.
      DR. FIELD:   Thank you.

      MR.  WOHLERS:  I have a simple question.  So far as
analytic techniques  are concerned,  they are physical measure-
ments and if you want analyses at this  and that location,  we can
provide them for you.  But then, after you get these data how do
you then judge whether my liver was affected or my lungs, or
which has affected my head?

      DR. FIELD:   It has  been mentioned previously that Mr.
Halitsky and another health study group were entering into a
study in New York City on welfare  patients and the possible ef-
fects of air  pollution.  I have been at one  or two of the meetings
and I understand they have quite a problem there in trying to as-
say that.  However,  there are certain  diseases we may go into
and see whether we  can  correlate with any of the particular pol-
lutants.  For example, one of the interesting things would be to
be able to compare  cities.  Does New York have  more air pollu-
tion than Boston? I don't  know whether this is  possible.  Is there
some level that  we might get,  or background level of air pollution
that would enable us to compare the morbidity and mortality and
air pollution among  cities. This has been tried in many other
ways through fuel consumption and economic indices and so on.
But for the actual morbidity and mortality studies underway, are
pollutants as measured today, sufficient? And  I feel that they are
not.  I don't dispute Mr. Stern's statement.   I just bring out what
our experience has been,  the fact that  stations  are set up in an
area and we have no prior knowledge as to whether those stations
are adversely affected by  the local topography or the local in-
stantaneous release of pollutants that might  occur because of
factory sites and so on.  Measuring carbon monoxide at a bridge
will  give you a good  idea of traffic.   Measuring carbon monoxide
one story above street level in another part  of town may give you
something else.  But I hope it is possible through your research
and through what I feel is  much-required  research, for you to

SYMPOSIUM:  AIR OVER  CITIES

-------
290                  FIELD AND McGUIRE

come up with numbers for us to use  more meaningfully in the
morbidity and mortality studies.

      If we are given more precise air pollution data to work with,
which you say you can provide,  I am sure we will be able to study
such data and those diseases which we suspect are aggravated or
brought about by air pollution and weather.
                              SEC TECHNICAL REPORT A62-5
                                                     GPO 8251 1 1-1 I

-------