PERFORMANCE
WOOD
1TORING OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
: FIELD TESTING FOR FUEL SAVINGS,
CREOSOTE BUILD-UP AND EMISSIONS
VOL. II
CONEG^
Policy Research Center
United States Environmental Protection Agency
A
sszz
-------
The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
(NYSERDA) is a public benefit corporation chartered by the New York
State Legislature. It is governed by a 13-member Board of Directors ap-
pointed by the Governor with the consent of the Senate. State Energy
Commissioner William D. Cotter is Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Executive Officer. A President manages the Authority's RD&D programs,
staff, and facilities.
As expressed in its enabling legislation, the underlying rationale for
establishing the Authority is:
... that accelerated development and use within the State of new
energy technologies to supplement energy derived from existing sources
will promote the State's economic growth, protect its environmental
values and be in the best interests of the health and welfare of the
State's population ...
The legislation further outlines the Authority's mission as:
... the development and utilization of safe, dependable, renewable
and economic energy sources and the conservation of energy and
energy resources.
The Authority's RD&D policy and program stress well-designed
research, development and demonstration projects, based on technol-
ogies with potential for near-term commercialization and application in
New York State. The Authority seeks to accelerate the introduction of
alternative energy sources and energy-efficient technologies and to im-
prove environmental acceptability of existing fuels and energy pro-
cesses. The Authority also seeks to ensure that Federal research pro-
grams reflect the needs of the State.
The use of New York contractors and an awareness of energy-related
growth opportunities are part of the Authority's effort to support in-
dustry in New York. Concentrating on these objectives ensures that
NYSERDA's RD&D programs will produce maximum benefits for the
citizens and businesses of New York, while attracting the participation
of both the private sector and the Federal Government.
NYSERDA derives its research and development revenues from an
assessment upon the intrastate sales of the State's investor-owned gas
and electric utilities. The Authority also derives income from the invest-
ment of retained earnings and leased property, as well as from bond
financings of pollution control facilities and special energy projects.
Further information about NYSERDA's RD&D programs may be
obtained by writing or calling the Department of Communications, New
York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Two
Rockefeller Plaza, Albany, N.Y. 12223; (518) 465-6251.
Mario M.Cuomo WilliamD.Cotter
Governor Chairman
State of New York New York State
Energy Research and
Development Authority
-------
PERFORMANCE MONITORING OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY WOOD STOVES:
FIELD TESTING FOR FUEL SAVINGS,
CREOSOTE BUILDUP AND EMISSIONS
Vol. II Technical Appendix
(Contains Appendices B, C, and D)
Final Report
Prepared for
NEW YORK STATE
ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Project Manager
Dr. Lawrence R. Hudson
and
CONEG POLICY RESEARCH CENTER, INC.
Project Manager
Steven J. Morgan
Technical Development Corporation
and
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Project Manager
Robert C. McCrillis
Prepared by
OMNI ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
10950 SW 5th Street, Suite 160
Beaverton, OR 97005
834-EIM-CE-86
Energy Authority
Report 87-26 November 1987
-------
NOTICE
This report was prepared by OMNI Environmental
Services, Inc. in the course of performing work
contracted for and sponsored by the New York
State Energy Research and Development Authori-
ty, the CONEG Policy Reseach Center, Inc. and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (here-
after the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed
in this report do not necessarily reflect those
of the Sponsors or the State of New York and
reference to any specific product, service,
process or method does not necessarily consti-
tute an implied or expressed recommendation or
endorsement of same. Further, the Sponsors and
the State of New York make no warranties or
representations, expressed or implied, as to
the fitness for particular purpose, merchant-
ability of any product, apparatus or service or
the usefulness, completeness or accuracy of any
processes, methods or other information con-
tained, described, disclosed or referred to in
this report. The Sponsors and the State of New
York and the contractor make no representation
that the use of any product, apparatus, pro-
cess, method or other information will not
infringe privately owned rights and will assume
no liability for any loss, injury, or damage
resulting from, or occurring in connection
with, the use of information contained, de-
scribed, disclosed, or referred to in this
report.
-------
Section
CONTENTS
VOLUME II
Appendix B - Calculation Procedures B-l
Appendix C - Quality Assurance C-l
Appendix D - Graphs of Stove Temperature, Flue Oxygen, Fueling
Practices, and Heating System Use D-l
-------
Appendix B
Calculation Procedures
-------
Calculation Procedures
1. Mass particulate emissions/mass dry wood burned
= MP x SV
FR x SD (1 - [%02/20.9%])
2. Mass particulate emissions/heat output
= MP x SV
FR x SD x HC x EF (1 - [%02/20.9%])
3. Mass particulate emissions/time
= MP x SV x MOW
FR x SD x SP (1 - [%02/20.9%])
4. Mass particles/volume
= MP
FR x SD
where:
MP = mass particulate emission (g)
SV = stoichiometric volume (I/kg dry wood)
FR = sampling flow rate (I/minute)
SD = sampling duration (minutes)
02 = oxygen in flue gas (% by volume)
HC = heat content of wood (J/kg wood)
EF = efficiency factor (%/100)
MOW = mass dry wood (kg)
SP = sampling period (hours) - total period stove was in operation,
with flue temperature > 39ฐC.
5. Stoichiometric Volumes
Stoichiometric volumes have been calculated by species from the carbon,
hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen content of the wood. Table B-l lists the
carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen values used for each species. Some
entries in Table B-l are literature values and some are from actual
ultimate analyses of the wood fuel. If no values were available for a
given species, then the values for a similar wood species was used. The
true stoichiometric volumes were modified for stove technology types due
to the level of incomplete combustion (viz, the CO content of flue gas)
characteristic of each technology type. Table B-2 gives the estimated
flue gas CO and C02 concentrations characteristic of the different
technology types. Attachment B-l illustrates an example calculation of
the modified stoichiometric volume for red oak fuel burned in a low
emission technology stove. The value calculated is referred to as the
specific modified stoichiometric volume as it is the volume per unit mass
(kg) of wood burned. Table 3 lists the sporatic modified stoichiometric
volumes for the various used species and stove technology types used.
B-l
-------
6. Heat Content
The heat content of the wood fuel by species is listed in Table B-l. Some
entries in Table B-l are literature values and some are from actual
ultimate analyses of wood fuel. If no values were available for a given
species, then the values for a similar wood species were used.
7- Efficiency Factor
Efficiency factors were determined by the "Condar Technique" (Handbook for
Measuring Woodstove Emissions and Efficiency Using the Condar Sampling
System, S. G. Barnett, August 1, 1985). The efficiency factors are
calculated from the emission factor (gm/kg), the average flue gas oxygen
content, the average stack temperature, and wood moisture. Attachment B-2
gives the procedures followed to calculate efficiency factors with this
technique.
B-2
-------
Table B-l
Elemental and Higher Heat Contents of Wood Fuel
Species
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Alder
Apple
Ash
Aspen
Beech
Birch
Douglas Fir
Elm
Maple
Oak
(unspecified
species)
Poplar
Red Oak
White Oak
White Pine
Cherry
Ironwood
Hickory
Elemental Content (%)
C, H, 0, N
51.64
50.44
49.73
51.64
51.64
49.77
52.30
50.35
50.64
49.97
51,64
49.49
50.44
52.55
49.77
49.67
49.67
, 6.26
, 6.59
, 6.93
, 6.26
, 6.26
, 6.49
, 6.30
, 6.57
, 6.02
, 6.61
, 6.26
, 6.26
, 6.59
, 6.08
, 6.49
, 6.49
, 6.49
, 41.
, 42.
, 43.
, 41.
, 41.
, 43.
, 40.
, 42.
, 41.
, 43.
, 41.
, 43.
, 42.
, 41.
, 43.
, 43.
, 43,
45, 0.00
73, 0.00
04, 0.00
45, 0.00
45, 0.00
45, 0.00
50, 0.10
34, 0.00
74, 0.25
24, 0.00
45, 0.00
74, 0.00
76, 0.00
25, 0.00
45, 0.00
11, 0.00
11, 0.00
Higher Heat
(Joules
kg dry
20.7
20.5
20.7
20.7
20.4
20.1
21.1
20.4
20.0
Content
x 106/
wood)
19.9
20.7
20.2
20.5
20.7
20.1
20.1
20.2
B-3
-------
Table B-2
Estimated Flue Gas CO and COg Content by Stove Technology Type
Stove Technology
Assumed
Volume %
CO C02
Moles CO
Moles CO + Moles C02
Moles C02
Moles CO + Moles C02
Catalytic 0.2 10.0
Add-on/Retrofit 0.8 10.0
Low-Emission 1.3 10.0
Conventional 2.0 10.0
0.03
0.11
0.17
0.24
0.97
0.84
0.83
0.76
B-4
-------
Table B-3
Calculated Stoichiometric Volumes by Wood Species and Stove Technology Types
Species
Stoichiometric Volumes (liter/kg)
Catalytic
Add-on/Retrofit
Low-Emission
Conventional
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Alder
Apple
Ash
Aspen
Beech
Birch
Douglas Fir
Elm
Maple
Oak
(unspecified
species)
Poplar
Red Oak
White Oak
White Pine
Cherry
Ironwood
Hickory
5111
5035
5036
5111
5111
4929
5209
5033
4954
4981
5111
4924
5035
5162
4929
4929
4929
5111
5035
5036
5111
5111
4929
5209
5033
4954
4981
5111
4924
5035
5162
4929
4929
4929
4955
4883
4886
4955
4955
4779
5051
4881
4801
4830
4955
4774
4883
5003
4779
4779
4779
4838
4769
4773
4838
4838
4666
4932
4767
4686
4717
4838
4662
4769
4884
4666
4667
4667
4701
4635
4641
4701
4701
4534
4794
4634
4552
4585
4701
4531
4635
4745
4534
4535
4535
B-5
-------
Attachment B-l
Banple Calculation of Specific Modified Stoichianetric Volume
- * *.:*-** *-*ป ***** -ป ป *-*** ******-*******ซ *-ปr+-ii **)<-ป-*> *************-****-**ป*-ป * * * **
Woe:-.: Species - Daualas Fir
Stove Type : Catalyst
Douglas Fir : 1 kg contains 523.O g C ==> 43.5
63.0 g H ==> 62.5
405.0 g O ==> 25.3
1.0 g N ==> O. 1
43.5 moles C ==O (O.O3)(43.5 moles) CO + (O.97)(43.5 moles) CO2
==:.- 1.3 moles CO + 42.2' moles CO2
1.3 moles O + (2 X 42.2 moles 0) ==> 85.8 moles 0 from CO & C02
62.5 moles H ==> 31.2 moles H20 ==> 31.2 moles O -from H20
moles 0 required for complete combustion:
85.8 + 31.2 ==> 117.0 moles O
1 kg wood contains 25.3 moles O
so, O -from air: T17.O - 25.3 = 91.7 moles D ==> 45.9 moles O2
N2/O2 ,-nole ratio in air: 3.73
Ar/O2 mole ratio in air: O.O45
<45.9 moles O2M3.73) ==> 171.1 moles N2 -from air
(45.9 moles O2)(O.O45) ==> 2.1 moles Ar -from air
ific Stoichiometric (modified) Volumt:
dry gas, STP
-------
Attachment B-2
Jfeking a Woodstove Efficiency Determination Using the Oondar Emissions System
The overall efficiency of a woodstove is the product of corbustion efficiency
times heat transfer efficiency. These instructions will treat corbustion
efficiency first, then heat transfer efficiency and finally, overall
efficiency. If you are interested in the scientific background of these
procedures, write to Cordar Coipany.
Corbustion efficiency is easily determined by using the table below. (For the
basic equation and its derivation, write to Condar Company.) Sinply locate
your Gondar emission factor on the table and read the corresponding ccrrbustion
efficiency. The data base for emission factors above 20 gm/kg is limited, so
corresponding combustion efficiencies must be considered approximate.
CDrvl'STlOft CJTlCIOtCT USING COMOMI ENIUIOHS FACTORS
IVM.IU uon jo en/He ปic nrrKziwn, HAVING teen
DCMVtD rpOH LlnlTTD DCO AMtl TVA MTAI
CI*M*
UmiV CM1AI
mil* Ifdflltf
um n
i.i n.M
i.i M.I
1.1 tf.U
1.4 11.1
1.1 H.ll
1.1 n.<
ซ.) H.I
ซ.i n.i
i.t IVM
i n.i
1.1 ซ.t7
I.I 11. 1}
1.1 K.JI
1.1 iซ.n
1.5 tl.H
I.I 11.11
1.1 11.41
I.I 11.11
1.1 11.11
1 11. 1)
l.t 11. n
7.7 11.71
7.1 tl.H
1.1 11.11
7.1 11.41
l.t 11. II
7.1 11. 71
I.I H.H
7.1 ป.M
1 H.ll
1.1 ซ.)!
1.7 H.11
1.1 N.ll
1.1 n.it
i.i n.n
1.1 n n
i.i ปi.4i
J.I H.71
i.i n.n
i n.n
i.i n.n
4.1 n.n
1.1 ll.U
I.I N.M
1.1 n.n
i.i 11.11
i.i ii.ii
1.1 n.n
1.1 n.n
> ll.U
C*M*
[imm (MAI.
IKIK IIUCIICI
uuri in
1.1 ll.U
VI V.N
LI 11.11
1.1 It. II
1.1 14.11
S_l H.ll
1.7 It. 17
!.l U.II
vi U.H
> ivn
1.1 n.n
I.J B.ll
1.1 n.*i
i.i n.u
i.i n.n
i.i n.u
4.1 11.11
4.1 11.11
4.1 11.43
1 K.ป
I.I K.11
1.7 H.ป
1.1 II. 1)
i.i n.n
i.t n.M
i.i 11.11
1.1 11. H
1.1 11.11
I.I II. Jl
1 11.71
I.I 11.11
1.1 11.11
1.1 17. K
1.1 11.17
i.t n.u
1. 17.11
i. ii.r.
1. I.-.71
1. U.II
n.n
i. ii.ii
1.1 ii. n
1.1 11.41
i.i 11.11
1.1 ii. ป
1.1 11.71
LI n.u
1.1 II. H
1.1 H.17
II M.ll
an*
HUM CMUII.
fKIM imcilKt
tun in
II. 1 M.ll
ll.l tt.il
1 ll.l M.U
II. < H.ll
ll.l M.71
ll.l H.ll
11.7 M.ll
ll.l 71.H
11.1 71.71
II 71.11
ll.l 71. ll
ll.l 71.1}
ll.l 71.11
11.4 71.71
ll.l 71.11
II. 71.11
II. 71. H
II. II. 1*
II. 71.11
1 71.11
17. ป.
-------
Use the table below do determine heat transfer efficiency. The values in
the table are derived from typical hardwood containing 6.57. hydrogen, 502
carbon. 20% moisture. See the box below the table for an example.
150 200
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE (ฐF)
250 300 350 400 450 500
550 600 650
k
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
87.8
87.7
87.5
87.4
87.2
87.0
86.8
86.6
86.2
85.8
85.3
84.6
83.5
82.0
79.4
86.5
86.3
86.1
85.9
85.6
85.3
84.9
84.5
84.0
83.3
82.4
81.3
79.6
77.1
73.0
85.2
85.0
84.7
84 .4
84.0
83.6
83.1
82.5
81.7
80.8
79.6
78.0
75.7
72.3
66.5
83.9
83.6
83.3
82.9
82.4
81.8
81.2
80.4
79.5
78.3
76.7
74.7
71.8
67.4
60.0
82.6
82.3
81.9
81.4
80.8
80.1
79.3
78.4
77.2
75.8
73.9
71.4
67.8
62.5
53.5
81.3
80.9
80.3
79.8
79.1
78.3
^77.3
76.3
74.9
73.1
71.0
68.0
63.8
57.5
46.9
80'. 1
79.6
79.0
78.4
77.6
76.6
75.6
74.3
72.7
70.7
68.2
64.8
60.0
52.8
40.5
78.7
78.2
77.5
76.8
75.9
74.8
73.6
72.2
70.6
68.1
65.3
61.5
56.0
47.8
33.9
77.5
76.9
76.2
75.3
74.3
73.2
71.8
70.2
68.2
65.7
62.5
58.3
52.2
43.2
27.6
76.1
75.5
74.7
73.7
72.6
71.3
69.9
68.1
65.9
63.1
59.6
54.9
48.1
38.1
20.9
74.9
74.1
73.2
72.2
71.0
69.6
68.0
66.1
63.6
60.6
56.7
51.6
44.2
33.2
14.5
U3
U
tx
X
o
u
o
I
CORRECTION FACTORS
(1) For Douglas Fir subtract 0.5% ,
(2) Tables Values are for 20% (moist basis) wood moisture.
Correction For Wood Of Different Wood Moisture.
Stack Temp. Heat Transfer Correction
For Each 10% Difference In
Wood Moisture
200
300
400
500
600
1.4%
1.4%
1.5%
1.5%
1.6%
Add the vood moisture correction to your heat transfer % if your wood is dryer
than 20% moisture and subtract if your wood is wetter.
Example: From A Douglas Fir Test Your test results show:
Average Stack Temperature ป 400ฐ
Average Oxygen ซ 13%
Average Wood Moisture = 25%
Heat Transfer Value From Table - 73.1
Fir Correction - -0.5
Wood Moisture Correction " - .75
Your llcat Transfer % - 71 .85
The values in the table are derived from typical hardwood containing 6.5%
hydrogen, 50% carbon. Moisture content, 20%.
1. Many moisture meters give dry basis moisture readings. We are working
with moist basis moisture here. To convert dry to moist basis use this
formula: ,
,. dry basis reading
Moist Rasis reading - . J , . ,, ..
(1 + dry basis reading)
-------
HINT: If you have oxygen and stack temperature values that are in between the
chart values, the easiest way to interpolate is to look at the chart values
that are diagonal in a lower left to upper right direction to the intersection
point of your oxygen and stack temperature values.
Example: Stack Temperature 275"F, Oxygen 10.52
Pertinent Part 250CF 300*F _ -
of Heat Transfer 10%
Chart: 11%
83.1
10.5%. 275T Intersection Point
The upwardly assending diagonal to the right indicates you should average
82.5 and 81.2Z to give an 81.8% value. The spread in the values along this
diagonal is much less than the spread along the other diagonal and hence, it
is easier to estimate the appropriate value by simple inspection.
OVERALL EFFICIENCY
Multiply your combustion efficiency times your heat transfer efficiency.
To continue your example:
Combustion efficiency ซ 87.4% (from previous example)
Heat transfer efficiency 71.9% ( " " " )
Overall efficiency ซ 62.83:
NET HEAT OUTPUT OF YOUR STOVE
Obtain net heat output (BTU/hour) by the following formula:
Net output (BTU/hour) ซ 8600 x (1 - wood moisture(decimal))x
(Burn rate in wet (as weighed) Ib/hr.) x (Overall efficiency X/100)
GRAMS PER HOUR EMISSIONS AND STOVE CERTIFICATION
For a stove to pass certification in states such as Oregon, the pollution
level of the stove must be shown as grams per hour of particulates.
Additionally, grams/hour must be determined over a wide range of burn rates.
Generally four stove tests are required. One test must be at least than
10,000 BTU/hour, a second at 10,000 - 15,000 BTU/hour, a third at 15 - 25,000
BTU/hour and a fourth at maximum heat output. For exceptions consult Oregon
D.E.Q.
HINT: Conduct your first test in the mid-output range. Then conduct
subsequent tests first at lower, then at higher outputs than the first test.
B-9
-------
Appendix C
Quality Assurance
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE
1.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE -- PARTICULATE EMISSION LEVELS
Participate emission levels are being reported in four different formats. These
are: (1) mass particles/mass dry wood; (2) mass particles/heat output; (3) mass
particles/time of stove operation; and (4) mass particles/volume of flue gas.
Accuracy and precision estimates were made for all primary parameters used to
calculate the particulate emission values. The accuracy and precision estimates
were based on manufacturer's specifications and from field and laboratory
experience. The accuracy and precision estimates are listed in Tables C-l and
C-2. Standard propagation of error treatment of the data was used to estimate
the overall accuracy and precision associated with the final particulate levels
which were calculated (Attachments C-l and C-2). Complete equations for the
calculation of these parameters and for the calculation of their associated
uncertainties are presented in Attachment C-2.
The emissions information collected from each home and sampling period underwent
a careful review process approved by the project QA officer to determine the
suitability of each sample for inclusion in the final report. From this review,
each sample was identified as either meeting the criteria for reporting, not
meeting the criteria for reporting, or as meeting most or all of the criteria,
but requiring a "flagging" of the results. Reasons for not reporting a sample
data point included excessive sampler leakage rates, malfunctioning oxygen
sensors, malfunctioning flue thermocouples, Data LOG'r^-m timing (clock) problems,
unacceptable woodbasket scale performance, scrambled data file, data transmission
loss, clogged sampling probes, improper wood weighing procedures by woodstove
operator(s), sample pumps unplugged or switched to override by homeowner, broken
stove door glass, and low use or zero use of the woodstove during the 168-hour
sampling period (24 hours or less operation time). In addition, there were
several cases where a sample was not collected as scheduled due to a home
occupant vacation, a modified woodstove (to reduce flue condensation problems),
or a Data LOG'r wiring problem. Reasons for "flagging" an emissions sample in
this report are given in the notes for each particulate emissions table and
include damaged, misaligned, or replaced combustors, a change in the type of
heating appliance being used, unusual operation of dampers or bypass levers,
suspected homeowner wood weighing problems, and oxygen sensor calibrations out of
the prescribed performance range.
C-l.
-------
1.1 Accuracy
A conservative estimate (i.e., maximum probable bias) was made of the systematic
error for each primary-parameter from which a propagated accuracy value was
determined. Propagated error values were calculated for every emission data set.
Attachment C-3 is an example data printout for one test run which illustrates
typical propagated error values. Two factors should be taken into consideration
when reviewing the accuracy data. (1) Accuracy is defined as a systematic bias,
and the same biases would manifest themselves throughout the entire study since
the same type of instrumentation was utilized at all homes, and, consequently,
accuracy would not be an issue in intra-study comparisons, e.g., comparing
catalyst vs. non-catalyst emission values, and (2) comparability tests were
conducted with OM-7 samplers by OMNI (Table C-3) and with stack and dilution
tunnel OM-7 samplers by the U.S. EPA (Tables C-4 and C-5). Additional
compatibility testing with Methods 5H and 5G was conducted by OMNI with funding
by U.S. EPA, BPA, and Oregon DEQ (Figures C-l through C-3). The data reveals
that values calculated from the AWES/Data LOG'r approach are reasonably close to
values obtained from standard OM-7, Method 5H and Method 5G equipment.
Table C-6 lists calculated accuracy from propagation of error determinations
(Attachments C-l and C-2) from a set of paired AWES samplers. Average calculated
AWES accuracy, using the data set of 29 AWES pairs used for precision
determination, was ฑ6.0 g/hr relative to an average calculated emission rate of
17.4 g/hr.
The mass particles/volume of flue gas format had the lowest (best) relative
accuracy among the four methods of reporting particulate emission levels. This
was due simply to the fact that fewer parameters were necessary to calculate the
mass/volume value and that the oxygen content which has a lower accuracy level
associated with it was not needed for the mass/volume calculation, whereas it is
needed to calculate the other three.
1.2 Precision
An estimate of the limit of error (1% confidence limit) was made for each primary
parameter from which a propagated precision value was determined. The limit of
error (A) is equal to 2.6 times the standard deviation (or) for a normal
distribution. The limit of error was used in the estimation of the precision
(random error) of the primary parameters since it is conceptually easier to
estimate than a standard deviation. As with the accuracy estimates,
manufacturer's specifications and field and laboratory experience were taken into
consideration in making the estimates. The precision estimates (A) for each
C-2
-------
primary parameter are listed in Table C-l and C-2. After an overall precision
value was calculated by the standard propagation of error technique, the value
was divided by 2.6 to put it in the more meaningful standard deviation form. An
example of the precision values associates with each of the four methods of
reporting particulate emission levels for a representative data set is given in
Attachment C-3. As can be seen from the data, the precision expressed as a is
approximately 20% of the particulate emission values themselves except for the
mass/volume parameter, for which it is 9%. The precision typically associated
with the standard U.S. EPA Method 5 technique is generally recognized as being
approximately 20%.
Dual samplers were used on several homes during the second heating season to
directly measure the precision of the AWES sampling system. A set of 29 paired
AWES samples was assembled and is presented in Table C-6. The overall average
difference between AWES average samplers relative to an average emission rate of
17.4 g/hr was ฑ3.2 g/hr, or an average difference of 18%. Sampler precision, as
the average difference of an individual sample (g/hr) from the mean of the paired
samplers, was 11.4%, with a standard deviation of 9.5%. Measured sampler
precision, in g/hr, averaged 3.8 g/hr lower (better) than calculated sampler
precision.
1.3 Comparability
As discussed in Section C-l.l above, three comparability studies have been
conducted. One study was conducted by OMNI utilizing in-stack OM-7 samplers for
comparison (Table C-3); one study was conducted by the U.S. EPA (Engineering
Science, Contractor) utilizing OM-7 samplers in stock and in-dilutor tunnels
(Tables C-4 and C-5); and one study has been conducted by OMNI (U.S. EPA, BPA,
and Oregon DEQ funded) in which Methods 5G and 5G were utilized for comparison
data reduction in progress (Figures C-l through C-3). The data to date reveals
that emission factors obtained with the AWES samples are reasonably comparable
with the standard OM-7, Method 5G and Method 5H.
1.4 Representativeness
Inherent in the design of the AWES/Data LOG'r sampling approach is a high degree
of representativeness. By sampling for one minute out of thirty for a week-long
period, a long-term integrated sample is obtained. Moreover, by the in situ
sampling of the emissions under actual home use conditions, samples
representative of "real world" emissions were obtained.
C-3
-------
1.5 Completeness
Data completeness (number of g/hr emission values divided by total number of
possible samples collected) is 59%.
1.6 Audits
Several audits were performed by an EPA-designated auditor (Research Triangle
Institute) during the second heating season of the project. Their findings, in
summary, are as follows:
1.6.1 Audit of Data Quality, October 1986
This audit addressed the recording and transfer of raw data, data calculations,
documentation of procedures, and the selection and discussion of appropriate data
quality indicators. It was based on data reported in the July 1986 Interim
Report. Audit conclusions were:
Basic study design addressing data quality and technical systems were
acceptable.
ซ An error in the algorithm used to calculate stack gas flow rates was
noted.
Minor discrepancies were found in many fuel use and particulate
emission calculations due to hand-processing of data.
OMNI's response to the audit findings were as follows:
The algorithm used to calculate stack gas flow rates was corrected.
Additional details regarding specific wood species, calculated (rather
than assumed) stove efficiency, and other factors were added to the
computer program.
All fuel use and particulate emission data for both heating seasons
were calculated using a computer program to ensure data quality.
1.6.2 Technical Systems Audit, March 1987
This audit was a qualitative on-site evaluation of measurement systems. The
audit was performed in the New York Study area (for field equipment and
practices) and in Burlington, Vermont (for sampler clean-up and sample handling).
Major audit conclusions were:
Inlet and exhaust ports of the AWES samplers were not capped during
transport.
XAD-2 cartridges for -POM/TCO analysis were extracted no earlier than
four days after removal from the home.
OMNI QA Officer did not visit the field site during the study.
C-4
-------
OMNI's response to the audit findings were as follows:
Inlet and outlet ports should have been plugged. Most samplers used in
Vermont were routinely capped; communication to the New York technician
was not clearly made. While it is acknowledged that inlet and outlet
ports should have been capped, the impact on gravimetric samples should
be negligible. Concerns over contamination of POM/TCO samples are well
founded, although the volume change due to ambient temperature change
is unlikely to cause ambient air to reach the XAD-2 resin. The large
void volumes of the filter holder upstream and silica gel canister
downstream of the main cartridge reduce the chance of contamination
significantly.
POM values, due to the low volatility of the compounds selected for
analysis, should not be significantly affected by short periods of
unrefrigerated storage. Additionally, the samples represent integrated
samples collected over one-week periods, during which collected ROMs
and TCO compounds could be lost. The POM/TCO task was outlined over
the course of several letters from OMNI and EPA, with changes and
additions in each. The rapid shipment and processing of samples,
requested in an EPA letter, was overlooked in the Work Plan.
Dr. Houck was scheduled to visit the field site in early December 1986
when RTI was scheduled to conduct a Technical Systems Audit. This
audit was cancelled, then rescheduled with one week's notice in March.
Dr. Houck was unable to reschedule existing commitments, and was
therefore unable to attend the audit. More frequent visits were not
budgeted. Quality assurance site visits and other activities were not
contracted in first heating season activities.
1.6.3 Field Performance Evaluation Audit. March 1987
This audit, intended to qualitatively evaluate performance of measurement
systems, was coordinated with the Technical Systems Audit. Major comments from
RTI were concerned with measurements of oxygen in flue gases:
02 cells were not always replaced when all output signals were less
than 6.5 mV, as stated in the QAPP.
A negative intercept was noted on the 02 signal at 0% 02-
Calibration checks on one 02 cell showed ambient 02 values to be 2.9%
(absolute) high. Concerns were raised regarding the accuracy of the
oxygen cells. A rating of "not acceptable, corrective action required"
was recommended for particulate emission data.
OMNI's response to the audit findings were as follows:
The normal range of 02 cell outputs is reported by the manufacturer as
5 to 15 mV and 20% 02- Typical values in the field were about 6.0 to
8.0 mV. Oxygen cells were replaced when the output signal was less
than 5 mV or poor/erratic signals; about 10 cells were replaced in the
course of the project. The QAPP reference to a minimum voltage of 7 mV
was erroneous.
C-5-
-------
The negative intercept for 02 signals was a hardware problem in the
Data LOG'rs. A correction was made for each individual Data LOG'r
during data reduction, providing a true 0 intercept for each file.
OMNI's QAPP stated that QZ accuracy would be ฑ2%. This should have
been more clearly stated as ฑ2% 02 absolute, not ฑ2% relative, as
apparently it was understood by RTI. OMNI edited 02 files for high
(>2% above 20.9%) and low (>2% below 20.9%) 02 at the end of test
periods and during no-burn periods during the sampling period when flue
gas 02 was at ambient (or lower) levels. If 02 values exceeded ฑ2% 02
(absolute) at any mid-point or end-of-period, the data was flagged and
not used for data analysis. (It should be noted that the AWES 02 cell
checked for the audit appears to be atypical; less than 10% of
otherwise valid samples were flagged from 02 editing efforts.) See
Section C-1.7 below for additional detail on accuracy and precision
checks on the AWES 02 cell.
1.6.4 Audit of Data Quality, August/September 1987
The final Audit of Data Quality recommended an "acceptable with recommendations"
rating. Comments concerned the following points:
ป OMNI's 02 validation procedures appeared to be in error in two cases.
More thorough review of data was recommended.
Presenting estimated precision and bias for each sampling rotation was
recommended.
OMNI's estimation of imprecision of sampler flows was thought to be
overly conservative; a smaller imprecision was recommended.
ป Various suggestions were made to improve sampling hardware and
methodologies for future studies.
OMNI's response to the audit findings was as follows:
02 validations were in fact done correctly. Confusion arose from the
format of data sheets which showed both 02 cell /iV output (actual
calibration value) and a computed 02 concentration at the time of Data
LOG'r activation. Only the /iV reading was taken with the AWES pump on,
which is necessary for an accurate reading.
* Precision and bias values for 51% of AWES samples are shown in Table
C-6 of the report. As the values are relatively consistent, they were
thought to provide adequate information to interested parties.
The bias estimate for AWES flow rates was intentionally conservative.
A more tightly-defined bias value would change precision and error
estimates by no more than 10 percent of the particulate emission rate
in most cases, and was therefore not thought necessary.
Most of the suggestions made by RTI to improve measurement accuracy in
future studies have already been made by OMNI. OMNI agrees with all of
the RTI recommendations.
C-6
-------
1.7 Oxygen Cell Precision and Accuracy
See attachment C-5.
1.8 Field Blanks
Field blanks were collected from AWES samplers under the field conditions in the
Vermont lab and in OMNI's Beaverton laboratory to assess any effect the
equipment, handling, shipping, or processing steps may have on the particulate
sample collected. Particulate samples are composed of the summed total of net
filter catch, net probe, and glassware rinses (with brushing) with methanol
(CH30H) and methylene chloride (CH2C12), and net XAD-2 resin extraction with
CH2C12- A total of 16 samples representing about 10 percent of the total samples
were planned for collection; due to equipment and procedural difficulties, three
samples were voided. The average particulate mass from the 13 field blank
samples was 101.2 mg, with a standard deviation of 46.6 mg. The average field
blank value represents about 25 percent of the average particulate sample catch
from all samplers. All results are reported with the blank value subtracted from
the lab totals.
Similar "second-generation" AWES samplers were built for other studies using
custom glassware which allows compression fittings to be used on all connections.
The original AWES samplers used for both sampling seasons on the NCS were built
on a "fast-track" program to get equipment into the field before the heating
season began. This required "off-the-shelf" components, including glassware with
ball joint connectors. The ground glass ball joints required vacuum grease to
ensure a leak-tight vacuum system. Laboratory testing showed a large portion of
the field blank was halo-carbon grease used on the ball joints. Field blanks
from another study using the second-generation (with compression fittings not
using vacuum grease) AWES samplers averaged 22.5 mg per sample.
Field blanks effects on data quality are considered insignificant for conclusions
of the study, relative comparisons of stove technology groups, and emission
values for stove technology groups. The magnitude of the field blanks increases
the uncertainty of individual samples, especially lower-emission samples. It is
unlikely that POM samples are affected, although an organic-based binder in the
grease could contribute directly or indirectly to reported POM or TCO values.
Further confirmation of the data validity was obtained from results of the AWES
sampler precision testing from the second heating season. Results from 32 pairs
of AWES samplers (64 individual samples) show a precision of 11 percent, with a
standard deviation of 10 percent. Additionally, similar studies of using the
C-7
-------
second-generation AWES systems have reported values quite similar to results
reported here using the first-generation samplers.
C-8
-------
Table C-l
Precision and Accuracy Estimates
Emissions Values
Parameter
1.
a
b
c
c
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
AMP
. AMF
. AMRMC
. AMM
. AMX
ASV
APR
ASD
A%02
AHC
AEF
AWDB
AMWW
ASP
Aindoor
temp
Aflue &
Estimated Precision (A)
Sum of a,b,c & d*
ฑ 1 mg
ฑ 2 mg
ฑ 2 mg
ฑ 20% (relative)*
-0- (constant)
ฑ 0.2 liters/min.
+. 1.78% relative*
ฑ 1%02 (absolute)
-0- (constant)
ฑ 0.03 (constant)
ฑ 3% (absolute)
ฑ 4% (absolute)
ฑ15% (absolute)
ฑ 11% (relative)*
ฑ 0.3% (relative)*
ฑ 2ฐF (1.2ฐC)
ฑ 3ฐF (1.9ฐC) or 0.5%
catalyst (relative)* whichever
temp
APOMi_8
is greater
ฑ 20% (relative)*
Estimated Accuracy
Sum of a,b,c & d*
ฑ 0.1 mg
ฑ 0.5 mg
ฑ 0.5 mg
ฑ 50% (relative)*
ฑ 500 liters/kg
dry wood
ฑ 0.3 liters/min.
ฑ 1.78% relative*
ฑ 2%02 (absolute)
ฑ 1.4 x 106
joules/kg
ฑ 0.1
ฑ 5% (absolute)
ฑ 5% (absolute)
ฑ 15% (absolute)
0.5% (relative)*
ฑ 1.0% (relative)*
ฑ 4ฐF (2.5ฐC)
ฑ 6ฐF (3.8ฐC) or
1.0% (relative)*
whichever is
greater
ฑ 30% (relative)*
Comments
weighing errors
polar compounds,
surrogate standards
range in calcu-
lated values
field observa-
tions, wet basis
6 min. out of
336 min. ; 1 sec.
out of 1 min.
field data
range in lit.
values
laboratory
experience
<25% moisture
25-35% moisture
> 35% moisture
Manf. specs &
field data
field data, post
calibration
field data
Manf. specs.
600ฐF threshold
for relative
error, Manf.
specs
surrogate
standards
C-9
-------
Table C-2
Precision and Accuracy Estimates
Wood Use (Volumetric) and Creosote (Mass) Values
Parameter
Estimated
Precision
(A)
Estimated
Accuracy
Comments
AHDD
ฑ0.5 per day
ฑ 1 per day
AV
AWDB
ACF.2
ฑ 0.0037m3 (0.13ft3)
ฑ 10T* (relative)
or greater
ฑ 3% (absolute)
ฑ 4% (absolute)
ฑ 15% (absolute)
-0- (constant)
AMWW
AMC
ฑ11%* (relative]
ฑ20 grams
NWS & DEQ discussions
Not true indicator of
heating demand. Mean
of Max. & Min. temp.
Always rounded up.
Precision ฑ 6 inches
in each linear dimen-
sion. Estimated 10%
accuracy for most
homes, some homes
will be identified
with a larger number.
<25% moisture
25-35% moisture
>35% moisture
Corrected moisture
meter reading.
ฑ 40% (relative) wood
density based on lab
experience with Douglas
fir (.3 to .7 grams/cm3
=> .5ฑ.2 => 40%. Void
spaces ฑ 10% (relative)
for stacked wood, 20%
(relative) for piled
wood.
ฑ 0.5%* (relative) Calib. data analysis.
ฑ 5% (absolute)
ฑ 5% (absolute)
ฑ 15% (absolute)
ฑ 50%* (relative)
stacked wood
ฑ 60%* (relative)
piled wood
<10% (relative)
Weighed on Ohaus Model
8004 Spring Balance.
Estimates based on man-
ufacturer's specifi-
cations. Measurement
errors are considered
insignificant in com-
parison to potential
accuracy and precision
factors in creosote
collection methodology,
which are estimated to
be ฑ 40% (relative).
C-10
-------
Table C-3
Comparability Tests -- AWES and OH-7
Test Description
AWES I.D.
Participate
Concentrations
(a/m3)
AWES OM-7
OM-7
%deviation
from AWES
Test 1
a. AWES, 1 min. on, 5 min. off
b. OM-7, Mean of 2 runs
c. One AWES sampler used
d. Sampling period 6.8 hrs.
35
2.8
2.6
-7%
Test 2
a. AWES, 1 min. on, 5 min.
b. OM-7, Mean of 3 runs
c. Two AWES samplers used
d. Sampling period 10.8 hrs.
off
24
35
0.48
0.58
0.42
0.42
-14%
-28%
C-ll
-------
Table C-4
U.S. EPA/ES Corrparability DATA (AWES, CM-7 & Dilution Tunnel)
O
Oil. Tunnel
with CM-7
Stove
Fisher Tech
IV Insert
"n
n
-
Earth Steve
1000C
n
"
"
Run Date
2/12/86
M
2/13/86
"
2/14/86
11
2/20/86
h
2/21/86
"
2/22/86
H
"
Bum Information
Doug fir, 22.0% moisture,
fi n
*< n
" 22.7% moisture.
n ซ
K H
" 23.9% moisture,
M "
M
22.2% moisture.
it n
ซ ft
" 23.0% moisture,
ซ n
n ft
23.0% moisture.
r. H
" "
1.0 kg/hr.
"
n
1.0 kg/hr.
ft
H
1.1 kg/hr.
"
n
1.3 kg/hr.
ซ
ft
i . I kg/hr.
'''
H
1.0 kg/hr.
H
m
19,400 Btu/hr*
H
H
21,300 Btu/hr
H
19,400 Btu/hr
N
H
25,300 Btu/hr
"
IB
21 , 300 Btu/hr
n
m
19,400 Btu/hr
M
M
Units
g/hr
gAg
g/mJ
g/hr
gAg
g/mJ
g/hr
gAg
g/mJ
g/hr
gAg
g/mJ
g/m
gAg
g/mJ
g/hr
gAg
g/mJ
AWES
5.34
5.02
0.342
3.77
3.47
0.236
6.72
6.55
0.446
6.88
4.94
0.336
2.03
1.69
0.114
2.64
2.38
0.162
CM-7
8.09
8.09
0.396
15.9
14.4
0.706
6.56
6.56
0.321
4.57
3.51
0.172
1.18
1.07
0.052
1.85
1.85
0.090
(R)
12.7
12.7
0.621
11.3
10.3
0.504
7.08
7.08
0.346
9.66
7.43
0.363
2.49
2.27
0.111
3.27
3.27
0.160
(Q)
8.21
8.21
0.401
6.08
5.53
0.270
6.76
6.76
0.330
9.71
7.47
0.365
^.18
1.98
0.097
1.86
1.86
0.091
Dil, Tun.
with CM-7
(X)
10.46
10.46
0.511
8.69
8.42
0.387
6.92
6.92
0.338
9.68
7.45
0.364
2.34
2.12
0.104
2.56
2.56
0.126
R/Q
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.86
1.86
1.87
1.05
1.05
1.05
0.99
0.99
0.99
1.14
1.15
1.14
1.76
1.76
1.76
AWES/
CM-7
0.66
0.62
0.86
0.24
0.24
0.33
1.02
1.00
1.39
1.51
1.41
1.95
1.72
1.58
2.18
1.43
1.29
1.79
AWES/
X
0.51
0.48
0.67
0.43
0.41
0.61
0.97
0.94
1.32
0.71
0.66
0.92
0.87
0.80
1.10
1.03
0.93
1.28
CM-7
X
0.77
0.77
0.77
1.83
1.71
1.82
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.72
0.72
0.72
* input heat
Fisher Tech IV
EarU-i Stove 1000 C
2.5 gr/hr Certified
3.5 gr/hr Certified
R = f-torma! run CM-7 in dilution tunnel
Q = QA replicate run CM-7 in dilution tunnel
-------
Table C-5
Mean Comparability Data U.S. EPA/ES
x, n-1 x, n-1 x, n-1 x, n-1
UNITS R/Q AWES/OM-7 AWES/x OM-7/x
g/hr 1.39, 0.38 1.09, 0.57 0.75, 0.25 0.86, 0.46
g/kg 1.39, 0.38 0.86, 0.52 0.70, 0.23 0.85, 0.46
g/mJ 1.39, 0.38 1.42, 0.71 0.98, 0.3.0 0.87, 0.50
n =
C-13
-------
Table C-6
AWES PRECISION AND ACCURACY MEASUREMENTS
Sample3
V01-4-3
V01-4-5
V01-5-3
V01-5-5
V01-7-3
V01-7-5
V05-4-3
V05-4-5
ync.c "3
VO^i-^-^
V12-6-3
V12-6-5
V13-4-3
V13-4-5
V13-5-3
V13-5-5
V13-6-3
V13-6-5
V13-7-3
V13-7-5
V16-4-3
V16-4-5
Vlfin -3
V16-5-5
V1fi-fi Q
V16-6-5
V16-7-3
V16-7-5
V34-5-3
V34-5-5
V34-7-3
V34-7-5
Participate
Emissions'5
(g/hr)
7.5
5.0
12.3
7.9
8.8
5.4
10.3
7.6
29.2
33.5
5.5
4.9
11.8
13.0
8.6
10.7
11.7
13.7
10.0
10.9
21.1
16.9
21.8
21.7
16.4
17.1
20.0
10.1
7.2
8.5
8.1
3.6
Measured
Precision0
(9/hr)
ฑ2.5
ฑ4.4
ฑ3.4
ฑ2.7
ฑ4.3
ฑ0.6
ฑ1.2
ฑ2.1
+9 ft
ฑ0.9
ฑ4.2
ฑ0.1
ฑ0.7
+Q Q
= y . y
ฑ1.3
ฑ4.5
Calculated Precision^ (g/hr)
Individual
ฑ3.5
ฑ3.7
ฑ4.9
ฑ4.2
ฑ4.5
ฑ4.4
ฑ4.8
ฑ4.6
ฑ11.8
ฑ13.4
ฑ2.8
ฑ3.2
ฑ5.6
ฑ6.4
ฑ4.4
ฑ5.5
ฑ5.1
ฑ6.3
+4.5
ฑ5.9
ฑ7.6
ฑ7.3
ฑ9.3
ฑ10.5
ฑ7.1
ฑ7.9
ฑ8.1
ฑ7.3
ฑ3.8
ฑ4.1
+4.5
ฑ3.5
Average
ฑ3.6
ฑ4.6
ฑ4.5
ฑ4.7
ฑ12.6
ฑ3.0
ฑ6.0
ฑ5.0
ฑ5.7
ฑ5.2
ฑ7.5
ฑ9.9
ฑ7.5
ฑ7.7
ฑ4.0
ฑ4.0
Precision: Calculated
vs. Measured
Difference6 (g/hr)
+1.1
+0.2
+1.1
+2.0
+8.3
+2.4
+4.8
+2.9
+3.1
+4.3
+3.3
+9.8
+6.8
-2.2
+2.7
-0.5
Calculated Accuracy^ (g/hr)
Individual
ฑ2.3
ฑ1.9
+3.8
ฑ2.5
ฑ2.9
ฑ1.9
ฑ4.2
ฑ3.3
ฑ13.1
+14.5
ฑ1.9
ฑ1.9
ฑ4.1
ฑ4.4
ฑ2.8
ฑ3.7
ฑ3.9
ฑ5.0
ฑ3.2
ฑ3.9
ฑ7.4
ฑ6.0
ฑ7.9
ฑ8.0
ฑ5.5
ฑ6.2
ฑ6.6
ฑ3.9
ฑ2.7
ฑ3.2
ฑ3.0
ฑ1.5
Average
ฑ2.1
ฑ3.2
ฑ2.4
ฑ3.8
+ 1 3 R
ฑ1.9
ฑ4.3
+3 3
ฑ4.5
ฑ3.6
ฑ6.7
ฑ8.0
+5 q
ฑ5.3
+3.0
ฑ2.3
-------
Table C-6 (Continued)
AWES PRECISION AND ACCURACY MEASUREMENTS
Sample3
Nfn-fi-?
N03-6-5
N08-4-3
N08-4-5
N08-6-3
N08-6-5
N08-7-3
N08-7-5
NflQ-4-7
Nf)Q-4-ti
N09-6-3
N09-6-5
NDQ-7 Q
N09-7-5
N15-4-3
N15-4-5
N15-5-3
N15-5-5
N15-7-3
wi R_7_E;
N18-4-3
N18-4-5
N18-5-3
N18-5-5
NlR-fi-^
Nlft-fi-R
Average^/
Part icu late
(9/hr)
26.3
22.3
32.7
32.5
27.4
25.8
34.4
27.3
21.2
21.1
16.6
17.5
26.9
32.2
10.4
8.3
5.9
9.8
9.9
12.9
23.1
18.1
36.8
45.7
29.6
33.5
17.4
Measured
Precision0
(g/hr)
+4 n
ฑ0.2
ฑ1.6
ฑ7.4
+n 1
ฑ0.9
ฑ5.3
ฑ2.1
ฑ3.9
ฑ3.0
ฑ5.0
ฑ8.9
ฑ3.9
ฑ3.2
Calculated Precisiond (g/hr)
Individual
ฑ14.0
ฑ11.8
ฑ9.1
ฑ9.8
ฑ7.6
ฑ7.3
ฑ8.8
ฑ8.0
ฑ6.3
ฑ7.0
ฑ6.8
ฑ6.3
ฑ8.3
ฑ9.8
ฑ7.9
ฑ8.2
ฑ4.1
ฑ5.1
ฑ6.3
ฑ5.9
ฑ6.1
ฑ5.8
+11.6
ฑ13.1
ฑ8.6
ฑ9.1
ฑ7.0
Average
ฑ12.9
ฑ9.5
ฑ7.5
ฑ8.4
ฑ6.7
ฑ6.6
ฑ9.1
ฑ8.1
+A A
ฑ6.1
+fi n
ฑ12.4
+ O Q
ฑ7.0
Precision: Calculated
vs. Measured
Difference6 (g/hr)
+8.9
+9.3
+5.7
+1.0
+6.6
+5.7
+3.8
+6.0
+0.7
+3.1
+1.0
+3.5
+5.0
+4.0
Calculated Accuracyd (g/hr)
Individual
ฑ11.8
ฑ9.9
ฑ9.3
ฑ10.8
ฑ7.5
ฑ7.1
ฑ9.4
ฑ7.9
ฑ6.4
ฑ6.7
ฑ5.5
+5.5
ฑ8.3
ฑ11.1
ฑ4.6
ฑ3.9
ฑ2.0
ฑ3.4
ฑ4.1
ฑ4.9
ฑ6.1
ฑ5.3
+12.5
ฑ14.6
ฑ8.9
ฑ9.8
ฑ5.9
Average
ฑ10.9
ฑ9.8
ฑ7.3
ฑ8.7
ฑ6.6
ฑ5.5
ฑ9.7
+4 ?
ฑ2.7
+A K
ฑ5.7
ฑ13.6
ฑ9.4
ฑ6.0
o
Iป
en
-------
Table C-6 (Continued)
a' For precision determinations, two AWES samplers were operated simultaneously at the stove's flue collar.
ฎ' Particulate Emissions (g/hr)Particulate emission rate in grams material per hour of stove operation (flue gas
temperature > 38ฐC).
c' Measured precision is the difference in emissions rates (g/hr) observed between dual simultaneous AWES samplers.
^' Calculated precision and accuracy based on total propagation of uncertainties of individual measurements used in
the emissions calculations, shown in Tables C- .
e' Difference (g/hr) in calculated vs. measured precision values. A positive difference indicates calculated value >
measured value; negative difference indicates calculated value < measured value.
f' Column averages. Absolute values of the differences were used to determine the average calculated precision vs.
measured precision value.
-------
i
iป
~j
Figure C-1
Emission Sampling Methods Comparability Test L01
Conventional Technology Woodstove "Portland Area" Burn Cycle
F a r t i c u I a 11
En is;ion
Rate
'N/hn
1 0 . 0 -
I * accurv:
^ F.att
J. - iccuri't
Eu
[Continuou
sn't]
* J
NDTE: Htthod EG snd 5H
ttiission ntts hsuซ an aji
* iOx accuracy
-------
50-
Particulate
EM issivn
Rate
M/hr)
00
2,0-
1.0-
Figure C-2
Emission Sampling Methods Comparability Test LB2
Integral Catalytic Woodstove "Portland Area" Burn Cycle
(flj^ujteij
*
SG
5H
Si
RHES
(jT^nt i nuoujj
fH EH
fFr-jportional 1C ? n s t a n t
R3t-4 J "
HDIE. Htthod EG 9nd EH psrticuI it* tMisiivn rstซs hivt sn ssiuMtd ซ iu/; accuracy
-------
5.0-
o
Iป
UD
EH iu ion
P.itc
i^'iu-j
3,0-
2.0-
1.0-
Figure C-3
Emission Sampling Methods Comparability Test L03
Integral Catalytic Woodstove "Northeast" Burn Cycle
j + i-cur;cy
m R^t
EG
1
TflQ/DCP
flUES
(TnttrH itttnt)
[Cont inuousl
NOTE: Method EG and ฃH p5r11 cu I s11 tti I ss i on r511s hsyt in 3ssuHtd * i0x sccuric
-------
Attachment C-l
Propagation of Errors
Precisionrandom error, reproducibility
Estimate A for each parameter
A - limit of error - 1% confidence limit
A = 2.6 a (normal distribution)
2. Accuracydeterminate, systematic error, bias
Estimate |x - true for each parameter, conservative error estimate, i.e.
maximum possible error
3. Propagation
F = f(Xl, x2> x3, ... .)
di
AF -
-r X LiAi
dXj l
df A
- x Ax,
x Ax-,
C-20.
-------
Attachment C-2
Calculations and Propagation of Errors - Participate and POM Data
Parameters - Participate and POM Data
1. MP Mass particles (total
MF Mass particles on filter
MRMC Mass particles from methylene chloride rinse
MM Mass particles from methanol rinse
MX Mass particles from XAD-2
2. SV Specific stoichiometric volume (corrected for stove type)
3. FR Sampler flow rate
4. SD Sampling duration
5. %02 Flue gas 02
6. NC Specific heat content
7. EF Efficiency factor
8. WDB Water in wood fuel - dry basis
9. MWW Mass wet wood
10. SP Sampling period
11. POMi_3 Mass POM
POMi Oxygen
POM2 Acenapthene
POM3 Phenanthrene
POM4 Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
POM/ 3-Methylcholanthene
POMg Pyrene
1. Mass Particles
(MP) =
AMP =
MF
AMF
+ MRMC
+ AMRMC
MRM
AMRM
MX
AMX
2. Mass Particles / Mass Dry Wood = MP x SV
FR x SD x (1 - %02/20.9%)
Propagated error =
AMP SV
FR x SD x (1- %02/20.9%)
+ ASV
MP
FR x SD x (1 - %02/20.9%)
+AFR
MP x SV
x SD x (1 - %02/20.9%)
ASD
MP x SV
FR x SD2 x (1 - %02/20.9%)
+A02%MP
SV
FR x SD x 20.9% x (1- %02/20.9%)
C-21
-------
Attachment C-2 (Continued)
3. Mass Particles / Heat Output = MP x SV
FR x SD x HC x EF (1 %02/20.9%)
Propagated Error =
AMP
+AFR
+AHC
SV
FR x SD x HC x EF x (1-%02/20.9%)
MP x SV
FR2 x SD x HC x EF x (1-%02/20.93
MP x SV
FR x SD x HC2 x EF x (1-%02/20.9%)
MP x SV
ASV
+ASD
+AEF
MP
FR x SD x HC x EF x (1-%02/20.9%)
MP x SV
FR x SD2 x HC x EF x (1-%02/20.9%)
MP x SV
FR x SD x HC x EF2 x (1-%02/20.9%)
FR x SD x HC x EF x 20.9% x (1-%02/20.9%)2
4. Mass Particulate Emissions / Time Stove Operations (SP)
MP x SV x
FR x SD x SP x (1 + WDB)(1-%02/20.93
Propagated error =
AMP
SV x
FR x SD x SP (1+WDB)(1-%02/20.9%)
+ASV
MP x
FR x SD x SP (1+WDB)(1-%02/20.93
+AMWW
MP x SV
FR x SD x SP (1+WDB)(1-%02/20.9%)
+AFR
.MP x SV x
x SD2 x SP (1+WDB)(1-%02/20.9%)
+ASD
MP x SVx_MWW
FR x SD^ x SP (1+WDB)(1-%02/20.9%
+ASP
MP x SV x.MWU
FR x SD x SP^ (1+WDB)(1-%02/20.9%]
+AWDB
MP x SV x
FR2 x SD x SP (1+WDB)Z(1-%02/20.9%)
+A02%
MP X SV x
FR x SD x SP x 20.9%(1+WDB)
(1-%02/20.9%)2
C-22
-------
Attachment C-2 (Continued)
5. Mass particles / volume = MP
FR x SD
Note: Standard temperature at which orifice mass flows are reported is 20ฐC.
Propagated error = AMP
1
FR x SD
AFR
MP
FP/ x SD
+ ASD
MP
FR x
6. Repeat equations 2-5 and associated error propagation equations for each POM
compound. Substitute POM i_g for MP and APOMi_g for AMP.
C-23
-------
Calcnlttiont find Propagation of Error* Wood Dปe
1. Mass dry wood / beatips dcKrec day -- \VoodpiIc
Mast dry wood / heating degree day = V CF
(1+WDBMGDD)
V = Volume of woodpile used (note 1 cord = 128 ft1 or 3.62 a*)
CF - Conversion factor mass wet wood / woodpile volume
CF - (l+WDBHCF.,)
1.2
CF.,ซ Conversion Factor oacs wood at 20% moisture / woodpile volume,
OSD data, assumes 1/3 void space, 2/3 wood
Mass dry wood / heating degree day ซ V CF,t
1.2 HDD
Propagated error
AV I CF.* I I V I .mn I V-CFtl I
AV I 1.2 HDD I * ACF" I 1.2 - HDD I AHDD I 1.2 BDDป I
2. Mass dry wood / beat inn degree day Data LOG'r
liass dry wood / heating degree day ซ= ifWV
(HDD)(1+WDB)
KVW ซ= Mass wet wood
Propagated error
11 I I inrw I I HW
(BDD)(141DB) I + AHDD I (HDD)Va.roB) | * AWDB |
C-24
-------
Attachment C -3
Exairple AWES Printout Program
Sample Site : Vermont Home 7
Sample Rotation: 7
Sample Location: 3 (Flue Collar)
De-fined Stove Operational Temperature
Log Book
02/22/87 00;00
O2/2B/87 24:OO
Calculated Stove Time
Calculated Sampling Time (total) :
Calculated Sampling Time (operational):
Calculated Mean 02 (total) t
Calculated Mean O2 (operational) :
Calculated Mean TCttl (operational :
336 min.
327 min.
15.9 7.
15.7 V.
(sd= 2.9 V.)
Wood ซ Type
13 Maple
5 Beech
1. 14 1pm
7. of Mixture Moisture
60.0
4O.O
Weighted Average:
Calculated Stove E-f f ici ency:
13.O
15.0
13.8
Stolen. Vol.
4954
5111
5017
HHV
20.0 MJ/kg
20.4 MJ/kg
20.2
55. 1 7.
Fraction of Time Stove in Operation :
Fraction o-f AWES Sample when Stove in Operation:
Mass Dry Wood :
Burn Rate (dry wood) :
97.2 7.
97.3 '/.
236.8 kg
1.45 kg/hr
Calculated Emissions
9.6 g/hr
6.6 g/kg
O.33 g/m^3
O.6 g/lO~6 J
Estimated Error (1 sigma)
Precision Accuracy
ฑ 1.2
ฑ O.03
ฑ O. 1
ฑ 3.4
t 2.2
ฑ 0.05
ฑ 0.2
C-25
-------
1.
Attachment C-4
Miscellaneous Parameters and Notes
Flue temp. (TC]J
"x ฑ S.D. weekly (above 100ฐF)
2. Percent of time combustor is operational (TC2>500ฐF) during stove use
(TCi>100ฐF).
3. MDW =
(1+WDB)
MDW = Mass dry wood
MWW = Mass wet wood
MDB = Water content wood
AMDW = AMWW
1
(1+WDB)
+ AMDB
1+WDB'
4. Burn rate
Kg dry wood / minutes, TC2 > 100ฐF
C-26
-------
AttachmentC-5
AWES Oxygen Cell Precision and Accuracy
Prepared for: Robert C. McCrillis,
Combustion Research Branch, and
Judith S. Ford,
Quality Assurance Officer
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Prepared by: OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.
10950 SW Fifth Street, Suite 160
Beaverton, Oregon 97005
August 27,1987
C-27
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Summary
The precision and accuracy of the oxygen data collected as part of the woodstove sampling conducted
in New York and Vermont have been thoroughly investigated by OMNI personnel. The precision and
accuracy of the data used from these cells have been demonstrated to be within the quality assurance
objectives of the project's QAPP as revised in Appendix B of the Mid-Study Progress and Data Report
dated July 1, 1986 (precision is ฑ1.0% oxygen, absolute, and accuracy is ฑ2.0% oxygen, absolute). The
source of the problem with the negative bias on the oxygen readings has been conclusively identified
and all reported oxygen values have been corrected. Data defining the precision and accuracy of these
cells, including dependence of the cells on temperature and including long-term drift of the
calibrations, are presented in this document as tables and plots; these data support the validity of
using the oxygen readings in the emissions calculations for the samples collected in New York and
Vermont.
1.2 Background
On March 23 and 24, 1987, auditors from Research Triangle Institute (RTI) conducted a technical
systems audit and a performance evaluation audit of the OMNI Environmental Services, Inc. woodstove
study in Glens Falls, NY, and Burlinton, VT, entitled "Performance Monitoring of Catalyst Stoves,
Add-ons, and High-Efficiency Stoves: Field Testing for Fuel Savings, Creosote Build-up, and Emissions
(Northeast Project)." Results of this audit were summarized in a draft final audit report dated April
30, 1987, and included a recommendation of "not acceptable, corrective actions required" The "not
acceptable rating" was largely due to accuracy and precision concerns about the oxygen sensors used
by OMNI in its Automated Woodstove Emissions Sampler (AWES). Specifically, the audit identified the
following oxygen cell-related problems or potential problems:
An in-field performance check of an oxygen cell at three different oxygen concentrations
resulted in two of the three readings being outside of the QAPP specifications.
Long-term stability of the oxygen cells over the week during which sampling takes place
was questionable.
A negative reading was obtained at 0% oxygen levels.
Oxygen sensors were not replaced according to OMNI QAPP guidelines.
In response to these audit findings, OMNI collected the following data:
Two sets of AWES oxygen readings collected at the same flue collar sampling position were
compared during a week-long in-lab AWES validation test.
The negative bias problem was definitely identified and a mathematical correction devised to
retroactively correct affected oxygen readings.
AWES oxygen readings were compared to a real time oxygen monitor during three week-long
in-lab AWES validation tests and a week-long in-field AWES validation test.
AWES samplers were operated in the lab for one week under various temperature conditions
to assess temperature dependence of the cells and to assess long-term stability of the
calibrations.
As part of a separate RTI audit of the AWES validation study entitled "Northwest Woodstove
Study," span gases were applied to three AWES units at the end of a week-long sampling
period as a check against accuracy.
C-28
-------
The oxygen readings for all data files collected in New York and Vermont were manually
reviewed for end-of-file oxygen calibrations and for any periods during which the stoves
were not operating as a check against unstable calibrations.
Flue gas volumes were calculated using four different methods during the Northwest
Woodstove Study as a check against the validity of using AWES oxygen readings in
calculating flue gas volumes.
Each of these data sets are described in more detail in the next section.
C-29
-------
2.0 PRECISION
2.1 Introduction
The precision objective of the oxygen cell was defined in the revised QAPP as included in Appendix B
of the Mid-Study Progress and Data Report as ฑ 1.0% oxygen, absolute.
2.2 Test Data
Precision data from a pair of AWES units operating simultaneously under actual stove operation
indicate that the precision of the AWES oxygen cells is extremely good. This test resulted in a data
set of 333 oxygen value pairs which had a maximum deviation from each other of 0.8% oxygen
(absolute) and a standard deviation of less than 0.3% oxygen (absolute), well within the QAPP precision
objective of 1.0% oxygen (absolute) (Figure 1).
In order to validate the AWES system against standard woodstove testing methods, the Northwest
Woodstove Study was designed to test a woodstove for a one week period of time simultaneously using
EPA modified Method 5, the EPA dilution tunnel method, two intermittently operating AWES, and one
continuously operating AWES. Tests were performed at OMNI's lab on two stoves at burn rate
protocols and wood species deemed representative of Northwest and Northeast stove operation. A
week-long test was also conducted at the home of a volunteer homeowner in the Portland area under
normal consumer-operated conditions.
The first of the in-lab tests included a pair of simultaneously operating intermittent AWES units both
collecting samples at the same flue collar position. The oxygen data from these two samplers can be
directly compared as they were operated by a single Data LOG'r and readings were recorded within 7
seconds of each other. The results of this comparison is summarized in Figure 1 and in Table 1. The
result of a linear regression between the two values yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.998 and a
slope of 0.989. The slope's deviation from 1.00 and the y-intercept of 0.25 is most likely due to the
small number of data points in the region less than 5% oxygen and the lack of weighting of the curve
in this area. Of the 333 data pairs, the maximum deviation of one set from the other did not exceed
0.8% oxygen (absolute), and the standard deviation did not exceed 0.3% oxygen (absolute). As can be
seen from Table 1, there were no significant differences in precision between six different ranges in
oxygen values; that is, the precision did not degrade at any point in the oxygen cell's working range.
The calculated mean operational oxygen percent (the value actually used in the emissions calculations)
for the two samplers were 14.4% and 14.3%, again in very good agreement with one another.
It should be emphasized that the oxygen cells used in these two samplers were picked at random and
standard calibration procedures were followed for each. The oxygen readings were corrected for the
Data LOG'r negative bias as discussed in the next section.
C-30
-------
FIGURE 1
Comparison of Two 02 Sensors, Week-Long Test: L81TAB80.B02
co
i.
d
M
C
4J
W
10-
5 -1
# Points
Corr
S lops
V-Int
0.3SS
0.3SS
0.2E
l 1
10 15
D2 Sensor #1 (x)
r
20
r
25
-------
Table 1
Comparison of Two 02 Sensors
*********#**********<***-***ซ*********ป*ปป#***ซป**#********
Input file : LO1TABOO.H02
Total number of paired 02 readings: 333
Rpqr ession result" o-f 02 t)? vs. 02 til:
N 3 ." 7-
Corrclation cciu-f-ficient . 0.'''9Q
Y- intercept 0.1"' 3 7
****+--ป ซ-**-*-******--lซ ******+ป#*-**-*-*v** *-* + ***ป
5 and ; = 10:
N : 28
Mean : 0.182 7. (absolute)
SD : 0.247 7. (absolute)
Max : 0.70O 7. (absolute)
ซ*-ซ- +-**. *ป**#**-a-*** ***+******+* ปซ-*-ป-*-#*-ซ****** ซ* *****ป*******
(02 #2 - 02 #2) when 02 #1 > 10 and <= 15:
N : 1 14
Mean : 0.104 7. (absolute)
SD : 0.241 7. (absolute)
Max : -0.80O 7. (absolute)
*** + + ##****#******ป***+***#**#-**-*-*#
(02 #2 - 02 #2) when 02 tt1 ) 15 and <= 20:
N : 78
Mean : 0.036 7. (absolute)
SD : 0.259 7. (absolute)
Max : -0.800 7. (absolute)
******+***+*****+*****#**********+**#*+**
(02 #2 - 02 tt2> when 02 til > 20 and <= 25:
N : 112
Mean : 0.018 7. (absolute)
SD : 0.257 7. (ab so Kite)
Max : 0.800 7. (absolute)
C-32
-------
3.0 ACCURACY
3.1 Introduction
The accuracy of the oxygen cell used in the AWES unit (Catalyst Research, Model 472062) is defined
by the manufacturer to be 2% of full scale (Table 2). This is the value used in the revised QAPP in
the Mid-Study Progress and Data Report (note: the original QAPP, dated January, 1986, cited the
accuracy of the oxygen cells to be ฑ 1.0% oxygen, absolute; this was in error).
3.2 Test Data
3.2.1 Negative Bias Determination and Correction
The source of the negative bias in the Data LOG'r has been identified and all affected O2 readings
(second year data only) have been corrected in a simple and highly accurate manner.
The RTI audit team mentioned in the March, 1987, audit of the OMNI DAS/AWES system that a
negative bias on the O2 readings was an item for concern in regard to the validity of the O2 readings.
This was first noted when a span gas containing 0% O2 was used on the AWES system, resulting in
both negative /iV readings and negative calculated O2 percentages. This problem also manifested itself
when a jumper was placed across the DAS /*V input terminals. Fortunately, this problem was traced to
a hardware assembly error hi the data loggers used by OMNI and simply affected the ground potential
used as a reference by the analog/digital conversion circuit. The problem was due to the system
ground current being pulled through a thin circuit board trace instead of through a heavier gauge
wire, with the result that the slightly higher resistance, coupled with the relatively high amperage
through this section of the circuit, caused a slight voltage bias. Moving the power ground to the
proper ground strap and adding a small jumper on the ground side of the filter board on the front of
the DAS removed this "bias" completely, confirmation that this was indeed the problem. Passing pure
nitrogen through an AWES unit after this fix resulted in the expected 0 /iV and 0.0% O2 readings, as
did placing a jumper across the DAS /iV input.
Because the length of circuit trace involved was short (less than 1/2"), the electronics engineer who
located the problem felt that temperature effects on the resistance and thereby on the bias voltage,
would be minimal. OMNI did conduct several experiments concerning the stability of this bias with
respect to temperature and to time and discovered that the bias is relatively constant (Tables 3 and
4). The 20 j*V shift in the bias over a Data LOG'r temperature change of 33ฐF represents only 0.05%
oxygen (absolute), which is below the detection limit of the cell. The shift over time summarized in
Table 4 may include some temperature effect as well, but even so the 40 fiV maximum difference
represents only 0.1% oxygen (absolute).
There is, however, a wide variation hi the biases measured between individual Data LOG'r units,
ranging from -450 /iV to -1200 /zV. As a result, the biases of all Data LOG'r units were measured
when they were returned to OMNI after sampling for the 1986/87 heating season was complete. It
should be noted that the bias affects only the results from the second year of sampling, as the wiring
error was introduced during some circuit modifications during the summer of 1986. It should also be
emphasized that because the ground reference potential for the A/D circuit was affected, all readings
from the O2 cell were affected in a linear fashion; that is, regardless of the actual O2 cell /iV output,
the error associated with the fiV reading as seen by the Data LOG'r is a constant value for that given
Data LOG'r.
Because the bias appears to be relatively constant, it is a simple matter to retroactively correct the
O2 readings collected during sampling mathematically. Because the Data LOG'r does not store the /iV
reading, but instead stores the O2 percent calculated from the calibration value determined when the
AWES unit is first installed for each sampling period, the beginning-of-file calibration in /iV must be
obtained from the field log books. The formula used by the Data LOG'r to convert the /*V reading
into percent O2 is
C-33
-------
Table 2
CRTftLYST RESEARCH
P. N. 472062
SPECIF I COT IONS
CHftRfiCTERISTICS
1. Primary Sensitivity
2. Operating Principle
3. Rechargeable / Replaceable
4. Range , Useful
5. Operating Life , S.T.P. with
minimum exposure to acid gases
6. Preconditioning Requirement*
7. Bias Supply / Reference Voltage
8. Internal Impedance 9 ฃ0 C
3. Required Circuit Impedance
10. Storage Life , S.T. P.,in mfgr.
recommended mode Q-S5 C
11. Operating Pressure Range
12. Operating Temperature Range
13. Temperature Compensated
14. Effect of Operating Temperature on
Rccuracy , from O to 5a C
15. Operating Relative Humidity Range
16. Response Timo to Step Change
I? a LPM IN TEE (UPTIME)
17. Position Sensitivity
18. Output Signal 9 SIX 02
IS. Linearity
2tf. Full Scale Output Drift , S. T. P. ,
continuous duty in air
21. Output at 0. 0X O2
22. Sensor Weight
23. End of Life Indication
24. Flow rate Range
25. Electrical Connection
26. Warranty
Partial P'ressure Ocf
Galvanic Fuel Cell
Replaceable
0 - 100X D2
7bป, tawid O2 % hrป.
NONE
NONE
110 ohms
18 K ohm mm.
6 month*
*/- 4 PSI
-3 to +tปO C
YES
( 5 % arror & Thermal
Equi1ibrium
O - 9954 RH non-condensing
< 2tf Bee to 9/ X
< Id sec to ^0 X
None
a fixed value between 3 &
17 mv which changes with
oxygen concentration
Within 2X of reading
< 2X F.S. / Month
I?. 25 rnv MOX.
31 grams max.
Sensor cannot be accurately
calibrated l> Ivnd X Q2
3tftf cc/rnin to 5 LPnl
( effects response time )
3 pin Gold Molex
1 year
C-34
-------
Table 3
Stability of DAS Negative Bias with Respect to Temperature
Elapsed Time
(min)
l'/2
2/2
4
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
60
85
Box Temo
(ฐF) '
43
44
45
46
50
54
58
64
67
70
74
76
Analog Circuit Output
When Jumpered (^V)
-620
-620
-620
-620
-630
-630
-630
-630
-640
-640
-640
-640
Placed DAS #8541-17 in refrigerator for 24
hours. Box temperature was monitored
inside the box, with the lid shut to avoid
uneven heating of circuit boards.
Table 4
Stability of DAS Negative Bias with Respect to Time
Analog Circuit Output
Date When Jumpered
4/9/87 am -530/iV
4/9/87 pm -550/iV
4/21/87 -510 ttV
4/28/87 -530/iV
Tests were performed on DAS #8541-17
C-35
-------
(20.9%) (^V reading obtained during sampling)
02% =
(fj.V reading obtained during calibration)
Knowing the calibration /iV reading and any given reading during sampling, it is a simple matter to
solve for the original /iV equivalent of that reading. The bias for the particular Data LOG'r used for
that sample is added to both the calibration /iV reading and the reading in question, and the above
formula is used to reconvert the /iV reading back into a corrected O2 percent.
The net effect of this bias correction is shown in Table 5 and Figure 2. It should be noted that the
largest effect of this correction is at the lower /xV readings. This is because the one-point calibration
at ambient O2 (assumed 20.9%) implicit in the formula above acts as a pivot point and because the
y-intercept implicit in the above formula as well (the b term in the general linear formula y = mx+b) is
assumed to be zero. With the correction, values on the low side of 20.9 are higher, and values on the
higher side of 20.9% (typically associated with an end-of-file calibration problem, to be discussed in
Section 3.2.5) would be lower. Readings corresponding to 20.9% would remain unchanged.
In practice, a computer program was developed which made the conversions quickly and accurately
before the data were used in any emissions calculations. All of the oxygen data presented in this
document were also corrected for this bias and represent more accurate data than data given to or
collected by RTI personnel during their audit.
3.2.2 AWES vs. Real Time Monitor
Calculated mean oxygen values for a continuous commercial oxygen analyzer versus an AWES unit were
well within the QAPP accuracy objectives of ฑ 2% oxygen (absolute). In all, four tests comprising a
total 1337 data points resulted in a mean difference of 0.7% oxygen (absolute) between the two
measuring methods.
As discussed hi Section 2.2, OMNI's AWES units were operated in conjunction with several standard
test methods as part of a comparability study. As part of these four tests, oxygen data were collected
from a continuous oxygen monitor and recorded every 10 minutes. This continuous monitor (Infrared
Industries Model IR-2200) is based on an electrochemical cell with a rated accuracy of 2% of full scale
and a stability of 2% of full scale over 30 days. This monitor is the same monitor used by OMNI as
part of its woodstove certification testing for Oregon DEQ and the US EPA and is part of OMNI's
accredited testing lab equipment. The monitor was calibrated before each test series using two span
gases, one of which is NBS-traceable, and a zero gas.
Table 6 summarizes the mean oxygen values for both the continuous monitor and the intermittent
AWES unit for each of the four comparability tests. It should be emphasized that the AWES units
were programmed to sample for one minute out of every thirty minutes and would only pull sample gas
for that one minute, resulting in some lag and integration of the oxygen readings because of the "dead
volume'' in the sampler. In contrast, the continuous monitor was pulling sample gas continuously and
would represent essentially instantaneous real-time oxygen measurements. Despite this difference,
Table 6 shows that the two oxygen measurement methods were quite close in three of the four tests,
and certainly within the QAPP accuracy specifications for all four tests. As each of these tests
involved over three hundred data points in the means, the data base is significant.
3.2.3 Temperature Effects and Long Term Drift
Three in-lab tests performed by OMNI indicate that both temperature effects and the drift in cell
calibration over the course of a week are well within the QAPP objectives of ฑ 2% oxygen. These
tests were performed under extreme temperature ranges and include pulling both ambient air and a
span gas. The oxygen cell appears to warm to ambient temperatures after being exposed to low
temperatures well within the 30 minutes described in the AWES Operating Procedure.
C-36
-------
Table 5
Effect of Bias Correction on Calculated Oxygen Readings
Old02
-1.5
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
Old Cell
Output (/iV)
-530
0
335
670
1005
1340
1675
2010
2344
2679
3014
3349
3684
4019
4354
468?
5024
5359
5694
6029
6364
6699
7033
7368
7703
8038
8373
Corrected Cell
Output (/iV)
0
530
865
1200
1535
1870
2205
2540
2874
3209
3544
3879
4214
4549
4884
5219
5554
5889
6224
6559
6894
7229
7563
7898
8233
8568
8903
Corrected
02(%)
0.0
1.5
2.4
3.3
4.3
5.2
6.1
7.0
8.0
8.9
9.8
10.8
11.7
12.6
13.6
14.5
15.4
16.3
17.3
18.2
19.1
20.1
21.0
21.9
22.9
23.8
24.7
This table is compiled assuming a typical negative
bias of 530 /tV and an oxygen output of 7000 pV at
ambient conditions
C-37
-------
FIGURE 2
PLOT OF EFFECT OF BIAS CORRECTION ON
CALCULATED OXYGEN READINGS
8000
o
GO
CO
CL
H
Z>
O
LU
O
6000
4000
2000
AFTER BIAS CORRECTION
WITH NEGATIVE BIAS
10
15
20
CALCULATED 02(%)
-------
Table 6
Comparison of Mean Oxygen Values as Calculated from a
Continuous Monitor and an Intermittent AWES
Test
L01
L02
LOS
P02-2
Number of
Readings
333
336
336
332
Continuous
Monitor,
Mean O2 (%)
14.6ฑ3.9
14.4ฑ2.5
11.6ฑ2.5
17.2ฑ1.4
Intermittent
AWES,
Mean O2 (%)
14.3 ฑ 3.8
13.0 ฑ 2.2
10.8 ฑ2.2
16.9 ฑ 1.3
C-39
-------
In response to RTI's concerns about the effects of calibrating the AWES oxygen cells before the
sampler had achieved thermal equilibrium and about long-term drift of the cells with respect to their
calibrations over time, OMNI conducted several in-lab experiments.
The first of these involved running an AWES on a normal sampling cycle (1 minute on/29 minutes off)
pulling ambient air. The AWES was placed in three different temperature environments during the
week, including three days in OMNI's warehouse area, two days on OMNI's roof exposed to large
temperature swings, and two days in a room heated with an electrical heater. The results of this test
are presented graphically in Figure 3. Temperature is obviously a factor in the oxygen cell's response,
as can be seen in the increase in the swings in oxygen readings as the variability of the ambient
temperature increases. This is despite the temperature compensation circuit in the oxygen cell. How-
ever, the manufacturer claims a 5% (relative) error at thermal equilibrium due to temperature effects
despite the temperature compensation circuit (Table 2) and as much as 20 minutes for thermal
equilibrium to be reached (Figures 4 and 5) after a temperature change. This last item is important in
that if the temperature is constantly changing, thermal equilibrium may never be reached, and the
error maybe larger than 5% (relative).
What is significant about OMNI's test is that the overall mean of 336 oxygen readings was 20.5%
(absolute), with a maximum of 21.2% and a minimum of 20.2%. This data at no time exceeds the QAPP
objective of ฑ2% oxygen, and when averaged over the entire week (as would be oxygen data for use in
the emissions calculations) is only 0.4% lower (absolute) than nominal ambient oxygen levels. The final
calibration check of the oxygen readings at the end of the sampling period yielded 21.0 %, only 0.1%
(absolute) higher than nominal ambient oxygen. It should be emphasized that this AWES unit was
submitted to quite drastic temperature extremes (49 to 99ฐF) which would not be typical of an in-home
installation.
The second test involved placing an AWES unit in a freezer for 6 hours to duplicate the transportation
of an AWES unit in an unheated vehicle to a participant's home. The AWES unit was then removed
from the freezer and the temperature of the oxygen cell was monitored over 30 minutes to duplicate
normal installation time of an AWES in a home. Oxygen cell temperature data is presented in Table 7.
The temperature of the cell went from 16 to 86ฐF during this half hour and appeared to have
essentially reached equilibrium in that time. The cell was calibrated following normal procedures and
data collected for one week as the AWES pulled ambient air. The results are presented graphically in
Figure 6. As with the data presented in Figure 3, the oxygen data shows an influence by temperature,
with regular temperature swings corresponding to the heat of the afternoons and the cool of the
night. The oxygen values range between 21.4% and 20.6% (absolute), clearly within QAPP guidelines.
The overall mean for the week is 20.9% and the calibration check at the end of the sampling period
was 21.4%. Long term drift does not appear to be a problem, especially when averaged across the
entire week.
A third test involved placing an AWES unit on OMNI's roof with the inlet connected to a gas sample
bag containing span gas to determine the effects of temperature swings on oxygen readings at an
oxygen level typical of what might be collected from an operating stove. The span gas was analyzed
before the test using the monitor described in section 3.2.2, yielding an oxygen concentration of 9.9%.
The AWES unit was allowed to operate at a normal sequence of 1 minute on/29 minutes off for
approximately 40 hours, at which time the gas bag was discovered to have a leak. The data is
presented in Figure 7. As can be seen from this plot, after the gas bag was connected and until the
gas bag apparently began leaking, the measured oxygen values ranged from 9.6% to 10.8%. The mean
for the first 24 hours was 9.9%, in excellent agreement with the measured concentration of the span
gas used.
3.2.4 End of File Span Gas Checks
Performance tests of three AWES units conducted at the end of an in-lab test using two span gases
and a zero gas resulted in values which are within 0.4% oxygen (absolute) of the nominal values.
As part of the RTI audit of the Northwest Woodstove Study April 8 and 9, 1987, OMNI personnel
performed end-of-sampling oxygen cell response checks on three samplers using span gases provided by
C-40
-------
o
21.5-
21.0
20.5-
20.0-
1S.E-
19.0-
18.5-
FIGURE 3
Weekly Oxygen Performance Profile: oZtempi.soZ
' ' I ' ' T
I Noon I Noon
OH/25/S7 OH/27/S7
I n I 7 I ' ' I ' ' \
Noon I Noon I Noon I Moon
OH/2S/47 OH/30/87 05/01/87
02 ftl
SSftl Temp
-130
-110
V
1.
4>
(I
i.
a
Ho
-70
-------
Figure 4
Thermal Stabilization of Oxygen Cell
Ambient to 40ฐ C
o
I
(M\/}
8-,
7-
6
5-
4-
3-
2-
0
-.5 MV
19.7% O2
-6.5%
-.3 MV
19.3% O2
-5.2%
i
5
I
10
I
15
WELL
BOARD
I
20
I
25
TIME (MINUTES)
30
T
35
-.4 MV
19.9% O2
-5.2%
ฑ.0 MV
20.8% O2
ฑ0%
I
40
SOURCE: CATALYST RESEARCH
-------
o
J,
CO
Figure 5
(MV)
8.0-,
7.5-
7.0-
6.5-
6.0-
5.5-
5.0-
0
Thermal Stabilization of Oxygen Cell
Ambient to 5ฐC
21.9%
23.3% O2
WELL
I I I I
10 15 20 25
TIME (MINUTES)
21.1% O2
+ 1.4%
20.4% O2
-1.8%
30 35 40
SOURCE: CATALYST RESEARCH
-------
Table 7
Temperature Recovery of AWES Oxygen Cell
Elapsed Time Oxygen Cell
(min) Temperature (ฐF)
0 16
2 46
4 61
6 68
8 74
10 76
12 79
14 82
16 83
18 [missed]
20 81
23 83
25 85
28 86
C-44
-------
.
en
21.5-1
21.0-
20.5-
20.0-
13.5-
13,0-
18.5-
F1GURE 6
Weekly Oxygen Performance Profile: 02TEMP3
-35
-SO
-85
-80
-65
' I ' ' I 1 ^ I T^ I T I r I ^ I ' ' I ' ' I
Moon I Moon I Moon I Moon I Moon I Moon I Moon
05/10/87 05/11/87 05/12/87 05/13/87 05/1S/87 05/15/87 05/16/87
02
SSttl Temp
-------
o
^
Ol
1H ,0-
13 .0-
12,0-
11,0-
10 .0-
3.0-
.0-
6.0-
OS/07/J7
FIGURE 7
Weekly Oxygen Performance Profile:Q2 TEMP2.SO2
Noon
02 II
01/01/17
Noon
Temp
-1HO
-ISO
-120
-110
0
i.
-100 ซ
Q
I
t)
-30
-80
.'-70
-------
RTI. These samplers were used as part of the in-lab test designated LOS; two of the samplers were
sampling intermittently and one was sampling continuously. The span gas checks were performed
before the end-of-file calibration check normally performed before shutting the AWES units down.
The results of these checks were previously reported in RTFs audit report; however, the AWES oxygen
values reported there were not been corrected for the Data LOG'r negative bias problem. Revised
results are presented in Table 8. The deviation of the AWES readings from the nominal values of the
span gases average only 0.3% oxygen (absolute), ranging from 0.2% to 0.4% (absolute). The deviation
of the AWES readings from the expected 0.0% of the zero gas is consistently 0.4% to 0.5% (absolute).
However, the high readings at 0.0% oxygen should not be a reason for concern, as the manufacturer
claims a maximum cell output of 250 jtV at zero oxygen levels (Table 2), corresponding to approxi-
mately 0.7% oxygen, and these readings are within this limit. Overall, the performance of the oxygen
cells are again well within the QAPP guideline for accuracy.
3.2.5 Screening of Field Data
All field data files were screened for end-of-file oxygen calibrations and oxygen levels during
non-burn periods; all data files which did not meet the QAPP accuracy requirement of ฑ 2% oxygen
(absolute) have been identified and will be flagged in the final report and not included in summary
calculations.
As a quality assurance check of the actual oxygen cell performance during sampling, all end-of-file
calibrations were manually reviewed for both years' data files. Data files with poor calibrations [more
than 2% (absolute) deviation in oxygen readings from 20.9%] were flagged in the final report. In
addition, a computer program was run on all data files to look for periods during which the stove was
not operating (defined as the flue gas temperatures being less than 100ฐF) for more than four hours;
printouts were generated showing the average of the top three values during such non-operational
periods. These printouts were also reviewed as an additional check for oxygen cell performance
outside of the accepted range; files which failed this check will also be flagged in the final report and
not used in the summary calculations. In all, 5 of the 74 Vermont files were flagged and 11 of the 63
New York files were flagged. This corresponds to 6.8% and 17.5% of the files, respectively. Overall,
11.7% of the data files failed to meet one or both of the above tests.
The higher discard percentage of the New York files is explained by the apparent greater care in the
handling of samplers and in the calibration of the AWES units before sampling that occurred in
Vermont.
3.2.6 Comparative Flue Gas Volume Calculations
The flue gas volume calculations based on AWES oxygen values for three in-lab stove tests are within
the ฑ 30% range of values calculated by four alternative methods, a further demonstration that the
AWES oxygen values, as used in emissions calculations, are accurate indicators of flue gas flows.
As part of the comparability calculations performed in the report for the Northwest Woodstove Study
("Woodstove Emission Sampling Methods Comparability Analysis and In-Situ Evaluation of New
Technology Woodstoves," July, 1987), flue gas volumes were calculated using four different gas compo-
sition methods. These calculation were based upon oxygen as measured by an intermittently sampling
AWES, oxygen as measured by a continuously sampling AWES, oxygen as measured by a commercial
continuous oxygen monitor (see section 3.2.2), CO2 as measured by a commercial continuous CO2 gas
analyzer (Infrared Industries model IR-702), and stoichiometric combustion. Formulas and example
calculations are attached as Appendix A. The results are summarized in Table 9.
Table 9 indicates that for the three in-lab comparability tests and for the five calculations done for
each, the overall range of calculated flue gas volumes varied by as much as ฑ 30%. The mean volume
calculated for test L01 was 1813 m3, ranging from 1744 m3 to 1848 m3; the AWES-based volumes
ranged from 1763 to 1818 m3, comfortably within the range of the extremes. The mean volume
C-47
-------
Table 8
End-of-Sampling AWES Calibration Checks
Span Gas O2 Bias-Corrected AWES O2 (%)
Content (%) AWES 8541-23 AWES 8541-27 AWES8541-13
9.7 10.1 10.0 9.5
0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4
15.2 15.5 15.4 14.8
0.0 0.4 0.5 0.4
C-48
-------
Table 9
Woodstove Emission Sampling Methods Comparability Analysis
Flue Gas Volume Calculations
Flue Gas Volumes (cubic meters)
Calculation Basis3 L01b L02C L03d
AWES O2 - Intermittent #1
AWES O2 - Intermittent #2
AWES O2 - Continuous
Stack O2 Gas Analyzer
Stack CO2 Gas Analyzer
Stoichiometric Combustion
1,763
1,790
1,818
1,846
1,744
1,848
1,317
N/A
1,601
1,601
1,712
2,146
2,025
N/A
2,06
1,48
1,566
2,143
Laboratory Mean Standard
Compara- Volume Deviation AWES - Intermittent #1 AWES - Intermittent #2 AWES - Continuous
bilityTest (m3)e (tr^) Vol. (m3) % of Mean Vol. (m3) % of Mean Vol. (m3) % of Mean
L01
L02
LOS
1,813
1,820
1,852
59
288
286
1,763
1,317
2,025
97.2%
72.4%
109.3%
1,790
N/A
N/A
98.7%
N/A
N/A
1,818
1,601
2,006
100.3%
88.0%
108.2%
a - Refer to Appendix A for flue gas volume calculation procedures
b - L01 - Conventional Technology woodstove using a "Portland area" burn cycle
c - L02 - Integral Catalytic woodstove using a "Portland area" burn cycle
d - LOS - Integral Catalytic woodstove using a "Northeast" burn cycle
e - Mean of non-AWES flue gas volumes (stack O2, stack CO2, Stoichiometric combustion).
C-49
-------
calculated for test L02 was 1820 m3, with values ranging from 1317 m3 to 2146; the AWES-based
volumes were the low value of 1317 m3 and an intermediate value of 1601 m . The mean volume for
LOS was 1852 m3, with values ranging from 1566 m3 to 2143 m3; again, the AWES-based volumes were
within this range, with values of 2025 and 2006 m3
The conclusion to be drawn from the data in Table 9 is that the AWES-based flue gas calculations are
generally within the range of flue gas volumes as calculated by several alternative methods. Because
the oxygen data collected by the AWES units in field sampling are used for essentially the same
calculation, this data supports the validity and accuracy of the AWES oxygen values when averaged
over the entire sampling period.
C-50
-------
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
Continued research into the performance of the oxygen cells used in OMNI's AWES samplers have
demonstrated that the precision and accuracy of these cells are within the guidelines established in the
revised QAPP. The source of the Data LOG'r negative bias, causing negative oxygen values to be
generated at 0% oxygen levels, has been positively identified, and all affected oxygen values have been
mathematically corrected. All end of sampling calibrations and oxygen levels during stove
non-operational periods have been reviewed manually and those files not meeting QAPP guidelines will
be flagged in the final report.
Although RTI indicated in their audit report that at 15% oxygen levels a 1% absolute difference may
result in a 20% variation in calculated emissions numbers, the QAPP precision and accuracy values
were included in the propagation of errors calculations performed on each and every emissions value.
As long as these propagated errors are kept in mind when looking at the emissions values, OMNI feels
confident that the values are meaningful and accurate.
C-51
-------
Appendix CC
Flue Gas Volume Calculation Procedures
-------
Flue Gas Volume Calculations
A. EQUATIONS
1. AWES:
VFG =
(SV)(MDW)
1-(02/20.9)
2. Stack O2:
VFG =
(SV)(MDW)
1-(02/20.9)
3. CO,:
VFG = (VDT)(CO,DT-CO,A)
(CO2F-CO2A)
4. Stoichiometric Combustion:
VFG = (SV)(MDW)
1-[(CO7+CO)SC/(CO7+CO)A1
1-[(CO2+CO)F/(CO2+CO)A]
B. EXPLANATION OF PARAMETERS
VFG = Flue gas volume (m3)
S V = Stoichiometric volume (lAg dry wood)
MDW = Mass dry wood (kg)
O2 = Oxygen content in flue gas (% by volume)
VDT = Volume of dry gas from dilution tunnel (m3)
CO2DT = CO2 content in dilution tunnel (% by volume)
CO2A = CO2 content in ambient air (% by volume)
CO2F = CO2 content in flue gas (% by volume)
(CO2+CO)SC = Hypothetical CO2 and CO content in flue assuming complete Stoichiometric
combustion (% by volume)
(CO2+CO)A = CO2 and CO content in ambient air (% by volume)
(CO2+CO)F = CO2 and CO content in flue gas (% by volume)
C. INSTRUMENTATION
AWES O2 Measured by Catalyst Research #472062 Cell
Stack Gas Analyzer O2 Measured by Infrared Industries Model 2200 Analyzer
CO2 (Flue Gas) and CO Measured by Infrared Industries Model 702D Analyzer
CO2 (Dilution Tunnel) Measured by LIRE Model 3200 Analyzer
CC-1
-------
D. EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Data from in-situ AWES/Method 5G comparison:
AWES O2 = 16.9%
Stack O2 = 17.2%
CO2DT = 0.358%
CO2A = 0.037%
CO2F = 3.5%
COF = 0.05%
MDW = 145.5kg
SV = 5184 I/kg
VDT = 37,908m3
1. AWES:
VFG = (5184 I/kg) (145.5 kg)
[1-(16.9%/20.9%)](1,000 1/m3)
VFG = 3941 m3
2. Stack O2:
3. CO,:
VFG = (5184 I/kg) (145.5 kg)
[1-(17.2%/20.9%)] (1,000 Vm3)
VFG = 4261 m3
VFG = (37,908 m3)(0.358%-0.037%)
(3.5% - 0.037%)
VFG = 3514 m3
4. Stoichiometric Combustion:
For Stoichiometric combustion in an integral catalytic woodstove approximately 3% of the fuel's
carbon content is converted to CO, and approximately 97% of the fuel's carbon content is
converted to CO2.
1 kg Douglas Fir contains: 43.4 moles C
63.4 moles H
25.5 moles O
43.4 moles C -ป .03(43.4) = 1.30 moles CO
.97(43.4) = 42.10 moles CO2
moles O from C -> 1.30 + 2(42.10) = 85.5 moles O from CO and CO2
63.4 moles H -> 31.7 moles H2O = 31.7 moles O from H
Total moles 0 required -* 85.5 + 31.7 = 117.2 moles 0
1 kg wood contains 25.5 moles O; 117.2-25.5 = 91.7 moles O required for complete combustion
91.7 moles O = 45.85 moles O2 required from ambient air.
CC-2
-------
Air contains: N2/O2 mole ratio = 3.73
Ar/O2 mole ratio = 0.044
moles N2 = 3.73(45.85) = 171.0 moles N2
moles Ar = 0.044(45.85) = 2.0 moles Ar
(C02+CO)SC =
CO + CO,
1.30 + 42.10
= 20.0%
CO + CO2 + N2 + Ar 1.30 + 42.10+ 171.0 + 2.0
(CO2+CO)F = 3.5% + 0.05% = 3.55%
Assume CO content in air is negligible: (CO2+CO)A = CO2A = 0.037%
VFG = (145.5 kg)(5184 I/kg)
1,0001/m3
VFG = 4286 m3
1-(20.0%/0.037%)
l-(3.55%/0.037%)
CC-3
-------
Appendix D
Graphs of Stove Temperature, Flue Oxygen,
Fueling Practices, and Heating System Use
-------
INDEX TO AWES SAMPLES
V01-4 D-60 V13-2 D-17 N04-1 D-72
-5 D-61 -3 D-18 -5 D-73
-7 D-62 -4 D-19 N06-1 D-74
V02-1 D-63 -5 D-20 -2 D-75
-2 D-64 -6 D-21 -3 D-76
V03-16 D-65 -7 D-22 N07-5 D-94
-36 D-66 V14-1 D-107 -7 D-95
-5 D-79 -2 D-108 N08-4 D-110
-6 D-80 -3 D-109 -6 D-lll
V04-3 D-81 -6 D-85 -7 D-112
-4 D-82 -7 D-86 N09-1 D-43
-6 D-83 V16-1 D-23 -4 D-44
V05-4 D-2 -4 D-24 -6 D-45
-5 D-3 -5 D-25 -7 D-46
V06-1 D-102 -6 D-26 N10-1 D-47
-2 D-103 -7 D-27 -5 D-48
-5 D-104 V18-4 D-87 -6 D-49
-6 D-105 -5 D-88 -7 D-50
V07-1 D-4 -6 D-89 Nll-2 D-51
-3 D-5 -7 D-90 -4 D-52
-6 D-6 V31-4 0-28 N12-4 0^77
-7 D-7 V32-1 D-29 N14-2 D-78
V08-1 D-8 -5 D-30 -6 D-113
-2 D-9 V34-5 D-91 -7 D-114
-4 D-10 -7 D-92 N15-4 D-96
-5 D-ll V35-7 D-93 -5 D-97
-6 D-12 N01-3 D-31 -7 D-98
-7 D-13 -5 D-32 N16-1 D-115
V09-1 D-106 -6 D-33 -4 D-99
V10-2 D-67 -7 D-34 -6 D-100
-5 D-68 N02-1 D-35 -7 D-101
-6 D-69 -3 D-36 N18-4 D-53
Vll-2 D-14 -4 D-37 -5 D-54
-6 D-15 -6 D-38 -6 D-55
-7 D-16 -7 D-39 -7 D-56
V12-2 D-70 N03-4 D-40 N32-5 D-57
-3 D-71 -5 D-41 N33-3 D-58
-6 D-84 -6 D-42 -5 D-59
D-i
-------
APPENDIX D NOTES
A. Graphs present data from sampling periods shown in Tables 3-10A and 3-10B
in the companion report. Graphs are in the order they appear in the
tables. They are grouped by stove technology category, and show Vermont
samples first, followed by New York samples.
B. Temperature graphs from catalytic stoves, retrofits, and add-on devices
sampled during the 1985-86 heating season show catalyst and stack
temperatures only. Samples from the 1985-86 heating season are
designated by -1, -2, or -3 following the home code (e.g., V05-1).
Samples from the second (1986-87) heating season include pre-combustor
temperatures (e.g., V05-4 and V05-5).
Catalyst temperatures from add-on devices with movable combustors were
taken as close as possible to the combustor, but may be immediately above
or below the combustor.
C. Auxiliary heating system use is shown when a heating duct in the room
with the stove showed temperatures over 35ฐC (95ฐF), or when baseboard
electric heat in the room was on. "Heating system use" therefore may not
document auxiliary heat use in other parts of the house.
D-l
-------
V05-4
1800~
1600-
1400-
8
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V05-4, from V05C2QSH.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/16/86 11/17/86 11/18/86 11/19/86 11/20/86 11/21/86 11/22/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
W
3(H
o
o 20H
o
10-
22
18
14
g
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V05-5, from V05C22SH.B02
V05-5
W^*tfP^w*
r < vf v
\<
.''WsV"V^*''f<\\-^'^'^^'"-'''r^~^'-j-~'-"^>\'\''.j'^
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ง
3(H
0 20-
O
10-
22
18
14
10
61
I I
K Illl Ill I
T
T
7T
T
' Noon I Noon ' I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-3
-------
V07-1
AWES Sampling Data: for V07-1, from V07C02JS.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86 01/14/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
5 30H
Q
ฃ
o
o 20-]
o
10-
22-
18
14-
10-
2-
/I
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86 01/14/86
02 VALUES
(AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE- MEASUREMENTS
D-4
-------
V07-3
1800-
1600-
1400-
-
ls s
- 800-
600-
400-
200-
AHES Sampling Data: for V07-3, from V07C06SM.HEX
900
800
700
G-
8 j
a
400-
300
200 H
100
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I
03/09/86 03/10/86 03/11/86 03/12/86 03/13/86 03/14/86 03/15/86 03/16/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
0 20H
O
10-
' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/09/8.6 03/10/86 03/11/86 03/12/86 03/13/86 03/14/86 03/15/86 03/16/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-5
-------
V07-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
o
la
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
AWES Sampling Data: for VQ7-6, from V07C24JS.BQ2
.i. i
I
'
100-
Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
o
O 20-
o
10-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon 1 Noon
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-6
-------
V07-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V07-7, from V07C26SM.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30H
O 20-|
O
10-
22
18
14
10-
6-
II
inn
IBI
' Noon 1 Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
-02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-7
-------
V08-1
AWES Sampling Data: for V08-1, from V08C01SM.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
s: -
ง
o _
w
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
8
ฃ 30~
Q
O
O 20H
o
10-
No'on I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-8
-------
V08-2
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q,
800-
600-
400-
200-
AHES Sampling Data: for V08-2, from V08C03SM.HEX
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/09/86 02/10/86 02/11/86 02/12/86 02/13/86 02/14/86 02/15/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 30-
S
^ -
o
ง 20H
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/09/86 02/10/86 02/11/86 02/12/86 02/13/86 02/14/86 02/15/86
02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
0-9
-------
V08-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V08-4, from V08C20SH.B02
900-
200-
100-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/18/86 11/19/86 11/20/86 11/21/86 11/22/86 11/23/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
X
> 30H
Q
ฃ
o
o 20H
o
10-
Nobn I Noon Noon Noon I Noon I Noon
11/18/86 11/19/86 11/20/86 11/21/86 11/22/86 11/23/86
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-10
-------
V08-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
a
s-
,
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V08-5, from V08C22SH.B02
900-
Noon Noo.n Noon I Noon Noon Noon Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30-
a
&
o
0 20-
o
10-
22
18
14
10
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-ll
-------
1800
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V08-6, from V08C24JS.B02
V08-6
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
ฃ 30~
Q
ฃ
O
o 20H
o
10-
22-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-12-
-------
V08-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
ANES Sampling Data; for V08-7, from V08C26SH.B02
900
100
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
3ฐH
Q
v/
O
0 20-|
o
10-
22
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-13
-------
V11-2
1800-
1600-
1400-
AWES Sampling Data: for Vll-2, from V11C08SH.HEX
o _
o,
800-
600-
400-
200-
100-
Noon No'on Noon I Noon I Noon I
02/26/86 02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86 03/02/86 03/03/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
Q
ฃ
O
O 20-|
O
^
22
18-
14-
10-
10-
6-
2-
Mlllllllllll
Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I
02/26/86 02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86 03/02/86 03/03/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-14
-------
V11-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
l g-
l &~
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700-
400-
300
200
100
AWES Sampling Data: for Vll-6, from V11C22JS.B02
Noon I Noon I
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87
TCiH (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST)
Noon
02/11/87
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
Noon
40-
> 30H
a
o
O 20H
i
10-
22
18
14
10
Noon I
02/08/87 02/09/87
02 VALUES h
Noon
I
Noon
I
02/10/87 02/11/87
l AUX. HEAT USE I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
Noon
D-15
-------
V11-7
AWES Sampling Data: for Vll-7, from V11C25SM.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
w
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
200-
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TM3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
Q
O
O 20-|
O
10-
22-
18-
14-
g
M
O
10
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-16
-------
V13-2
1800-
1600-
1400-
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
AMES Sampling Data; for V13-2, from V13C03SM.HEX
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/23/86 02/24/86 02/25/86 02/26/86 02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86
. TC#1 (STACK)
. TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
0,
O
0 20-i
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/23/86 02/24/86 02/25/86 02/26/86 02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86
-02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-17
-------
V13-3
1800-
1600-
1400-
a
ง
a
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V13-3, from V13C05SM.HEX
100-
Nobn ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/23/86 03/24/86 03/25/86 03/26/86 03/27/86 03/28/86 03/29/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
OH
Q
Q
o
o
30-
20-
10-
Noon I Noon I No'on I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/23/86 03/24/86 03/25/86 03/26/86 03/27/86 03/28/86 03/29/86
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-18
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
ANES Sampling Data: for V13-4, from V13C20JS.B02
V13-4
900
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/02/86 12/03/86 12/04/86 12/05/86 12/06/86 12/07/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
3
o
O 2(H
o
10-
22
18
14
10-
6-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/02/86 12/03/86 12/04/86 12/05/86 12/06/86 12/07/86
-02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-19
-------
V13-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
s
H
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
AWES Sampling Data: for V13-5, from V13C23SM.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
. TC#1 (STACK)
Tซ2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
Q
ฃ
O
O 20-|
o
10-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-20
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
GT-
SH
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data; for V13-6, from V13C25SH.B02
V13-6
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
TCfl (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
3(H
O 20H
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
- 02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-21
-------
V13-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
sr-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
[3 .
ง
s
a
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V13-7, from V13C27SM.B02
Noon Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon 1 Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
> 30H
Q
0
8 20-|
o
10-
22
18
14-
10-
6-
2-
I I
v
'
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-22
-------
V16-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
GT-
SH
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V16-1, from V16C01JS.HEX
900
Noon I Noon I Noon Noon Noon Noon Noon
01/26/86 01/27/86 01/28/86 01/29/86 01/30/86 01/31/86 02/01/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
S 30~
Q,
O
0 20-|
O
10-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/26/86 01/27/86 01/28/86 01/29/86 01/30/86 01/31/86 02/01/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-23
-------
V16-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
II
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V16-4, from V16C20JS.B02
900-
Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/30/86 12/01/86 12/02/86 12/03/86 12/04/86 12/05/86 12/06/86
TCซ (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
fed
ฃ 3(H
Q
$
O
O 20-
o
10-
10-
6-
2-
i i
Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/30/86 12/01/86 12/02/86 12/03/86 12/04/86 12/05/86 12/06/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-24
-------
AWES Sampling Data: for V16-5, from V16C23SH.B02
V16-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
ฃ-
s-
800-
600-
400-
200-
200
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
8
Q
O
O 20H
O
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-25
-------
V16-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V16-6, from V16C25SH.B02
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
... TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 30~
Q
i"
O
iS
8 20H
O
10-
22
18
14-
10-
6-
2-
I il III mi nung
! I
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
02 VALUES
) AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-26
-------
V16-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
= S~
t BJ
o S
-t
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V16-7, from V16C27SM.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30-
a
& H
O
O 2H
O
10-
22
18
14
10
6-
lil
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
02 VALUES I lAUX. HEAT USE I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-27
-------
V31-4
1800-f
1600-
1400-
in
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
AWES Sampling Data: for V31-4, from V31C2QSH.B02
200
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/06/86 12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86
. TC#1 (STACK)
Tซ2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
0
Q
ฃ
O
O 20-
O
10-
22-
18-
14-
ID-
2-
I I
,1
J-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/06/86 12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86
-02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-28
-------
V32-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
ฃ-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V32-1, from V32C01JS.HEX
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/14/86 03/15/86 03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
ฃ 30~
a
ฃ
0 20-|
o
10-
22
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/14/86 03/15/86 03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86
02 VALUES : lAUX. HEAT USE I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-29
-------
V32-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
o
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V32-5, from V32C20SM.B02
200 J
1004
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87 01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
> 30H
Q
fe
o
3
O 20-
o
10-
22
18
10-
6-
2-
l I
Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87 01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-30
-------
N01-3
AWES Sampling Data: for N01-3, from N01C08TW.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
\ ฃ"-
800-
600-
400-
200-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86 03/21/86 03/22/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
S1
Q
ฃ
O
o 20H
o
10-
22
18
14-
g
M
O
10
6-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon
03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86 03/21/86 03/22/86
-02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-31
-------
N01-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700-
G
S3
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N01-5, from N01C22TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
TC#1 (STACK)
. TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
3ฐH
Q^
O
o
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-32
-------
N01-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
er-
S-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700
&
8
a
400-
300
ZOO-
100
AWES Sampling Data; for N01-6, from N01C23TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon
02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87 02/08/87
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 3ฐH
Q
^-^
^ ,
o
22
18
14
0 2H
O
O
10-
10-
6-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87 02/08/87
-02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-33
-------
N01-7
1800-f
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800-
700-
CT
400 ^
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N01-7, from N01C24TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
o
>. 30H
Q
ฃ
O
I
O 20-|
o
10-
22
18
14
10-
2-
l I
Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-34
-------
N02-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data; for N02-1, from N02C02TW.HEX
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/18/86 01/20/86 01/21/86 01/22/86 01/23/86 01/24/86 01/25/86
TC.#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
Q
fe
O
o 20H
o
10-
22
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/18/86 01/20/86 01/21/86 01/22/86 01/23/86 01/24/86 01/25/86
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-35
-------
N02-3
1800-
1600-
1400-
o
to
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N02-3, from N02C05TW.HEX
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86 03/21/86 03/22/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
8
ฃ 30~
Q
fe
O
O 20-)
O
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon
03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86 03/21/86 03/22/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-36
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
9001
800-
AWES Sampling Data: for N02-4, from H02C20TW.B02
N02-4
ซ*>' \a
\; ' v: v* \:
\v
? \- '-" g w \>
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/23/86 11/24/86 11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30-
a
& -ซ
o
0 20H
o
10-
22
18
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/23/86 11/24/86 11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-37
-------
N02-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
BJ
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N02-6, from N02C24TW.B02
02/01/87 02/02/87 02/03/87
TCซ (STACK)
Noon
02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87
TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30-1
Q_
fc
O
O 20-|
o
ฃ
10-
22
18
14
10-
6-
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/01/87 02/02/87 02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-38
-------
N02-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
9001
800
700
CT
400-
300
200
100-
AWES Sampling Data; for N02-7, from N02C26TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
S
% 3(H
Q
O
0 20-|
O
10-
22
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-39
-------
N03-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for NQ3-4, from N03C20TW.B02
900-
200-
100
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86 11/30/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
Q
ฃ
O
o 20H
o
10-
22
18
14
6-
III
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon 1Noon
11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86 11/30/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-40
-------
NIW-D
1800-
1600-
1400-
er-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N03-5, from N03C22TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
TCซ (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
30H
o
O 20H
o
10-
22
18'
14-
10-
6-
2-
III I
l
i
I
ll
i
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
- 02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-41
-------
N03-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
2ง
o -
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N03-6, from N03C23TH.B02
900-
800-
700-
G
a
ง
o
400-
300-
200-
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/01/87 02/02/87 02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TCซ (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
0 20H
o
10-
22
18
14
O
10-
6-
I
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/01/87 02/02/87 02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-42
-------
N09-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700
AWES Sampling Data; for N09-1, from N09C01TW.HEX
IN
- ': 3 \ , a^:-
':.'' X"" '= '
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/05/86 02/06/86 02/07/86 02/08/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
S 30~
a
o
O 20-j
o
10-
22
18'
14-
10-
6-
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/05/86 02/06/86 02/07/86 02/08/86
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-43
-------
N09-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
[2
S
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N09-4, from N09C20TW.B02
900-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
o
w
g 30H
Q^
o
o 20-j
o
10-
22
18-
14-
10-
6-
2-
Noon
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
02 VALUES I lAUX. HEAT USE i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-44
-------
N09-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N09-6, from N09C23TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87 02/22/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30H
Q
fe
o
8 20-|
O
10-
22
18
14
10
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/17/87 02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87 02/22/87
-02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
[ WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-45
-------
N09-7
AWES Sampling Data: for N09-7, from N09C24TW.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
200
100
\
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
Q
O 20-|
O
10-
22
18
14
g
r-]
O
10-
6-
2-
Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
. 02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-46
-------
N10-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
E1-
o _
a
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
AWES Sampling Data: for H10-1, from H10C01TH.HEX
100
I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon
02/06Z064/86 02/05/86 02/06/86 02/07/86 02/08/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
% 3ฐH
CD
O
O 2(H
o
10-
22
18'
14'
10-
6-
2-
III I
II II II I I I I l
ซi
I l
I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/06Zg84/86 02/05/86 02/06/86 02/07/86 02/08/86
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-47
-------
N10-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
AWES Sampling Data: for N10-5, from N10C21TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/18/87 01/19/87 01/20/87 01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
Tซ3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O 20-|
o
10-
22
18
14-
10-
6-
Noon I Noon
01/18/87 01/19/87 01/20/87 01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
-02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
: WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-48
-------
N10-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
a
Q,
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data; for N10-6, from N10C22TH.B02
Noon i Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon Noon
02/15/87 02/16/87 02/17/87 02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
Q
ฃ
O
Q
O
O
30-
20-
10-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/15/87 02/16/87 02/17/87 02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-49
-------
N10-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
I1
800-
600-
400-
200-
200
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N10-7, from N10C23TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 3oH
Q
O
3
O 20-|
o
10-
22
18
14-
10-
6-
2-
Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-50
-------
N11-2
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data; for Nll-2, from N11C02TW.HEX
900-
800-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/02/86 03/03/86 03/04/86 03/05/86 03/06/86 03/07/86 03/08/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
> 30H
Q
O
o 20H
O
10-
22-1
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/02/86 03/03/86 03/04/86 03/05/86 03/06/86 03/07/86 03/08/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
[ WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-51
-------
N11-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
s
o
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
AWES Sampling Data: for Nll-4, from N11C20TW.B02
100
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
TW1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
o
o
20H
10-
Noon 1 Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-52
-------
N18-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
AWES Sampling Data; for N18-4, from N18C20TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/23/86 11/24/86 11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30H
O 20H
i
10-
22
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/23/86 11/24/86 11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-53
-------
N18-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
o
u
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AMES Sampling Data: for N18-5, from N18C23TW.B02
200-
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TCI2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
Q
fe
O
0 20-
O
10-
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-54
-------
N18-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data; for N18-6, from N18C24TW.B02
Noon Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87 02/08/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 30~
Q
& H
O
O 20-]
O
10-
22
18
14-
8
6-
2-
I l
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87 02/08/87
02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-55
-------
N18-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
g
BJ
O
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N18-7, from N18C25TW.B02
900-
200-
100
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
TC#1 (STACK)
. TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O 20-|
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-56
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
ANES Sampling Data; for H32-5, from N32C20TW.B02
N32-5
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87 01/11/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
O 20-|
O
10-
22
18
14
I
I
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87 01/11/87
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-57
-------
N33-3
1800-
1600-
1400-
O
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
s
s
Q_
400-
300
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N33-3, from N33C02TW.HEX
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon
02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86 03/02/86 03/03/86 03/04/86 03/05/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
3(H
O 20-1
O
10-
22
18
14
10-
6-
2-
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86 03/02/86 03/03/86 03/04/86 03/05/86
02 VALUES I lAUX. HEAT USE i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-58
-------
1800-1
1600-
1400-
ง
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N33-5, from N33C20TW.B02
900-
800-
700-
' v
A; ,
i! i
'HI
":
!:
"'I,
.itrJ
i!
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1
01/18/87 01/19/87 01/20/87 01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87
Noon
N33-5
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
ฃ 30-
Q
fe
O
o 20-1
o
10-
22-
2-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/18/87 01/19/87 01/20/87 01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-59
-------
V01-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
s
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
AWES Sampling Data: for V01-4, from V01R20SH.B02
100J
Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/16/86 11/17/86 11/18/86 11/19/86 11/20/86 11/21/86 11/22/86
. TCI1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
3(H
Q_
3
O 20-|
o
10-
22-
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon^INoon'
11/16/86 11/17/86 11/18/86 11/19/86 11/20/86 11/21/86 11/22/86
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-60
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
8
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
AWES Sampling Data; for V01-5, from V01R22JS.B02
V01-5
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
S
3(H
Q
**-s
* *
O
O 20H
o
10-
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-61
-------
V01-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
200
100
AWES Sampling Data: for V01-7, from V01R26SM.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ai
Q
ฃ
O
Q
O
O
30-
20-
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon 1 Noon I Noon I
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-62
-------
V02-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
\_-
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V02-1, from V02A02SH.HEX
900
800
Noon I Noon
01/08/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
8
ฃ 3ฐH
Q
O
O 20-|
O
10-
22
18-
14-
10
6-
' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/08/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-63
-------
V02-2
AWES Sampling Data: for V02-2, from V02A05SM.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
PJ
800-
600-
400-
200-
200-
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/13/86 02/14/86 02/15/86 02/16/86 02/17/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30H
O 20-
o
10-
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/13/86 02/14/86 02/15/86 02/16/86 02/17/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
0-64
-------
V03-1
AWES Sampling Data: for V03-1, from V03A01SM.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
O _
(3
e
800-
600-
400-
200-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
30H
Q
fe _
O
O 20H
O
10-
22
18
14-
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
- 02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-65
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
ฃ -
8
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for V03-3, from V03A05SM.HEX
V03-3
100-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/09/86 03/10/86 03/11/86 03/12/86 03/13/86 03/14/86 03/15/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
OJ
Q
O 20-
o
10-
22
18
14
g
CN
O
10-
6-
2-
i i
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon
03/09/86 03/10/86 03/11/86 03/12/86 03/13/86 03/14/86 03/15/86
-02 VALUES
( AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-66
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
er-
o _
a
o
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800'
AWES Sampling Data: for V10-2, from V10A03SM.HEX
V10-2
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/23/86 02/24/86 02/25/86 02/26/86 02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
M
ฃ 30H
Q
fe
o
o 20H
o
10-
22-
18
14-
10
6-
I IHHI 11111
IIUII11 I H
I I
|l
' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/23/86 02/24/86 02/25/86 02/26/86 02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86
-02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-67
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
II
ง1
m Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
a .
400
300
200
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V10-5, from V10A23SH.B02
V10-5
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O 20-]
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
02 VALUES
i AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-68
-------
V10-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
3-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700
G
400
300-
200
100
AWES Sampling Data: for V10-6, from V10A25SH.B02
Noon
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
Noon
Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
a
IT
o 20H
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon 1 Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-69
-------
V12-2
1800-
1600-
1400-
f "
Si
sJ
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800-
700-
CT
a
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V12-2, from V12A03SH.HEX
Noon Noon Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/20/86 02/21/86 02/22/86 02/23/86 02/24/86 02/25/86 02/26/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30H
G
I
o 20H
10-
22
18
14
10-
6-
2-
9|
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon
02/20/86 02/21/86 02/22/86 02/23/86 02/24/86 02/25/86 02/26/86
-02 VALUES
X. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-70
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
l j|-
\ S
H
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700
400-
300-
200-
100-
AHES Sampling Data; for V12-3, from V12A05SH.HEX
V12-3
Noon ' Noon I
03/24/86 03/25/86 03/26/86
TC#1 (STACK)
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/28/86 03/29/86 03/30/86
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
ซ
> 30-i
Q
O
a
O 20H
O
10-
' . '.'
Noon I Noon I
03/24/86 03/25/86 03/26/86
02 VALUES l
Noon ' Noon ' Noon I Noon
03/28/86 03/29/86 03/30/86
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
tu
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800-
700-
C?
IS
ง
S
Q
400-
300
200
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N04-1, from N04A02TW.HEX
N04-1
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/19/86 01/20/86 01/21/86 01/22/86 01/23/86 01/24/86 01/25/86
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
o
g 30-
Q
O
O 20-
o
10-
22
18
14-
g
CS
O
10-
6-
2-
HI m 11
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/19/86 01/20/86 01/21/86 01/22/86 01/23/86 01/24/86 01/25/86
02 VALUES
i AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-72
-------
N04-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
er-
SH
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AHES Sampling Data; for N04-5, from N04A21TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
3(H
o
O 20-|
O
10-
22
18-
14-
S
10-
6-
2-
' Noon ' I ' Noon 'I ' Noon 'INoon 'INoon'1Noon'I Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
-02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-73
-------
N06-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
| B
I ^
800-
600-
400-
200-
A^JES Sampling Data: for NQ6-1, from NQ6A01TW.HEX
100-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/19/86 01/20/86 01/21/86 01/22/86 01/23/86 01/24/86 01/25/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
S 30-|
o
53
3=
Q
O 20-
O
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon Noon
01/19/86 01/20/86 01/21/86 01/22/86 01/23/86 01/24/86 01/25/86
- 02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-74
-------
N06-2
1800-
1600-
1400-
la
gs
800
600-
400-
200-
AHES Sampling Data: for N06-2, from N06A03TW.HEX
100
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon i Noon I Noon
02/15/86 02/17/86 02/18/86 02/19/86 02/20/86 02/21/86 02/22/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
Q
30H
O 20-|
O
10-
22
' N0on INoon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/16/86 02/17/86 02/18/86 02/19/86 02/20/86 02/21/86 02/22/86
02 VALUES
-------
N06-3
1800-
1600-
1400-
C -
O _
800-
600-
400-
200-
WIS Sampling Data: for N06-3, from N06A05TW.HEX
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon
03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86 03/21/86 03/22/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
O
W
O 20-|
o
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon Noon Noon
03/16/86 03/17/86 03/18/86 03/19/86 03/20/86 03/21/86 03/22/86
-02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-76
-------
N12-4
AWES Sampling Data: for N12-4, from N12A20TW.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
sJ
e
800-
600-
400-
200-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
Q
fe
O
O 20H
o
10-
22
18
14
S
10J
II Nil
111
I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
- 02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-77
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data: for N14-2, from N14A04TW.HEX
N14-2
900-
Ndon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/02/86 03/03/86 03/04/86 03/05/86 03/06/86 03/07/86 03/08/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
> 30H
O 20-
o
10-
22
18
14
g
OJ
O
10
6-
2-
li
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon
03/02/86 03/03/86 03/04/86 03/05/86 03/06/86 03/07/86 03/08/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-78
-------
AWES Sampling Data; for V03-5, from V03L20JS.B02
V03-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
e-
1-
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800-
700-
a
S
& '
400-
300-
200-
100-
12/14
\
h ' * : !
; ii5 *j H M M U. M ^ ., 1
i> ?-,;>; j : ill ; Ji S "\ M ..is ii > iiij
H i :| |U^ i iA 'i \ ' i|\ :\ i ( U ^\ $ A if
V '^v-^-'l^'^^y^vM1
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
.TC#1 (STACK)
Tซ2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
% 3(H
Q
fe
O
O 20H
O
10-
22
18
14
ID-
2-
Illl
Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-79
-------
V03-6
AWES Sampling Data: for V03-6, from V03L22JS.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
er-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
&
(DEGREES
400-
300-
200-
100-
* JL
-1 .''.
I
\ "
\:
Noon
-.
, . i ~
> 1 H J!;|
1 1
-------
V04-3
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data; for V04-3, from V04L03SH.HEX
900'
800'
700-
G
O
a
Q -
400-
300-
200-
100-
\
\
V
> I
i > -I \
' ! i=:'5.X
' /'i '!:!!
i^l ฃฃ
:? i"
! ! '. ' '
1 i !
\; \
\ \
Noon 1
I
V
Noc
,i
''\
(|
!
*
^v.
''5 '^ :
"\
)n 1 Noon
;
- r
' ;
.:;.
I'l-
;-|:
<*
1 \
i
v
1 '
[
\i
^
;;
\
V
Noon
|
'
\ ' "
\t- ": :
< ! rx :
:'fci i
ii 5 r
, ( ;
i"
! . '*
i ! f '
:\ l \ \
V ' W
1 ' Noon ' 1
j
3 i
^ ;
$ 5 :
:? ' *
* '
(* l
' ; ( ',
\ \ i
Noon 1 Noon
03/09/86 03/10/86 03/11/86 03/12/86 03/13/86 03/14/86 03/15/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
g 30-|
Q
ฃ -
O
O 20-)
i
10-
' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/09/86 03/10/86 03/11/86 03/12/86 03/13/86 03/14/86 03/15/86
02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-81
-------
V04-4
AWES Sampling Data: for V04-4, from V04L20JS.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
tu
ฃ~ ฃT -
^ LU
is
fc ฐ -
ซ W
Is
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
G1
a
a
o
BJ
400-
300-
200-
100-
11/1E
', ; i ;
j, ;| ;
;;'vl. '|
^
'v'^ . ;
i :*''.; -\
s - '. !< ' \
( < "i | ',
V 'V^Jl^
i
L , ;':
i ': f [ /
'. l .'i ! !: '.
' ^ !; '\ ''. ' '
1 5 - : l! ^ ji; j 1 }ฃ ::
r'l * ' ' r'^ ! >! ^li * :P \ ^ *! ' :
1 M \t\l\ H. ' ; I '1 11
\ : ': 'i;1' v,|! 1 j' ';:: ]' ; ; : \ ^
^v ' \_ ? vi yx
'* ^
^>
li;
M' :
'* !'
- *S
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
/86 11/17/86 11/18/86 11/19/86 11/20/86 11/21/86 11/22/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
3(H
Q
i
o
0 20-|
O
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/16/86 11/17/86 11/18/86 11/19/86 11/20/86 11/21/86 11/22/86
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-82
-------
V04-6
AWES Sampling Data: for V04-6, from V04L25JS.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
er-
1-
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900'
800-
700-
a
ง
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
\
^
! i-
( ';
i ;
*:
ฃ:
': ' \
} \
f \
V
3 ill- i }
> ' ; 1 ' '
j ;; (
! j'' =
i : ijif :! f-
'? ':''> t't ''
'i. .-.: \. : ' \
' ':'. \\ \
"l * . *
ii; \i \
i:1
ii|
It ii
ii :'f5
- '. ! ป i
,: ซ i :'\
| \ j \
v \
(I . C
= , ! J !$: :-
!^! ^ ^ ? '.1 ! i; ;|
;; ;i T ii Hi
! v !;-.* :^;d
! .' : f /!'.
> ' ^ i ! ป : : ^ 5^ ; : :
\ \ \ ' ', \ ' '* l i ' ; ?
\1 \ V "'
\v V v
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon I Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
.TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
Q
s
O
O 2(H
o
10-
22
18-
14-
10-
6-
2-
II
I I
JL-J.
T
' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
- 02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-83
-------
V12-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
H
H
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800
700
CT
S3
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V12-6, from V12L25SH.B02
Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
ซ
> 30H
O 20-j
o
10-
22
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-84
-------
V14-6
AWES Sampling Data; for V14-6, from V14L25SH.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
6T-
1-
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800'
700-
a
3
a
400-
300'
200-
100-
J j :
; i .
i ^ | i j| j : >, !.; ,;
j/ij 4,'^ i n ai\S ?. i\. : -;. I* ' ii -, ,; * J.^- i, i Jปi'l
?? iiiVs"1; U^r;\iUU 1? j^ ^\ i\ '-jifil ;!/?ง :\^!^
v,j '"H^v* ^i^r^'V, \g\^ Vv-^W-
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon I Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
*
O
0 20H
O
10-
22-
18-
14-
10-
6-
2-
I I
"II
I I
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
- 02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-85
-------
V14-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
I
(D
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700
fj
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V14-7, from V14L27SM.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
- TCซ (PRE-CAT)
40-
Q
o
s
O 20-
o
10-
22
18-
14-
ID-
2-
i ' i.
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-86
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
u
B
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800
700
G1
400
300
200
100-
AWES Sampling Data; for V18-4, from V18L21JS.B02
V18-4
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/30/86 12/01/86 12/02/86 12/03/86 12/04/86 12/05/86 12/06/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
g
a
O
0 20-j
o
10-
* II
Noon I Noon 1 Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
11/30/86 12/01/86 12/02/86 12/03/86 12/04/86 12/05/86 12/06/86
-02 VALUES
(AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-87
-------
V18-5
AWES Sampling Data: for V18-5, from V18L24SM.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
3 ฃ>_
^D
b $
ฃ o
e ia ~
i a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
u
a
ง
o
PJ
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
1 1 .... h \ 1
' -, ' ' 5 ; ; ;:'- ::
> ; U^ . . ; :\ i $i$ ?' . 1 & UiS,
: ' 5l:::^.i t: 1 ':' ' -^l i M /?. ii ; !.;' i ^ : =%;'.:
! ;..(_.. V /. % v j i, J ; , , '.'.;'.. '; ;', H ''*.)!;. ; *\ ' '
\y!fl^f^npvwiL yV^^r*
^ \
i_^K.
Noon Noon I Noon 1 Noon Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
3
O 20-|
O
10-
22
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/11/87 01/12/87 01/13/87 01/14/87 01/15/87 01/16/87 01/17/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
-------
V18-6
AWES Sampling Data: for V18-6, from V18L26SM.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
(DEGREE
i
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
G
ง .
400-
300-
200'
100-
k
* , !-: , :* h=n >
SfJj^y^ \l*'$\ ^P\jn^'M'\
^v.^ >
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
Ktl (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
Q
ฃ
O
O 20H
o
10-
22
6-
2-
il
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/08/87 02/09/87 02/10/87 02/11/87 02/12/87 02/13/87 02/14/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
[ WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-89
-------
V18-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
ง
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800-
700-
fj
S2 \
400-
300
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V18-7, from V18L28SM.B02
UWWl
V, ,. V, \. .A V
Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 30H
E
O 20-
10-
22
18
11-
10-
6-
2-
-i i !* i "i
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
02 VALUES
i AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-90
-------
AWES Sampling Data: for V34-5, from V34L20JS.B02
V34-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
|a"
a B
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
CT
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
j
1 1 r * ซซ i* i'jซ- j ir v [ /l! L ^ * !'/ ป ''!L!!> ; * i^v *y . i j^^ i -
V\^ : \f \
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon ' Noon 1 Noon T Noon 1 Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
.TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
Q
te
o
0 20H
i
10-
22
18-
14-
10-
6-
2-
I H H
l i
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
- 02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-91
-------
V34-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
700-
(j
8
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V34-7, from V34L25SM.B02
Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
TM1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
O
o
20H
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/22/87 02/23/87 02/24/87 02/25/87 02/26/87 02/27/87 02/28/87
. 02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-92
-------
V35-7
AMES Sampling Data; for V35-7, from V35L23SH.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
ง s? -
^ pj
& ง -
la
800-
600-
400-
200-
900'
800'
700-
G
1 '
3
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
.
ฐj
1
\
v^
Noon 1 Noo
;
{
'.\
'' \
f ::
j
, ''i \ ! L
t :: :
i ' 1 \ '*r
H \\ ;l ' v
V S \
n 1 Noon 1
i
; i :
< ; i
I -: '.\ ;
': f ;'; 1 1 ;
i ;; f 1: 1 :;
; j^J " i v
; v M ^
i !v^\
V, v
Noon 1 Noon
i
> f;
v 1
> !
' * i
5 i '. 'j^'c
1 J''"it \
\ \ |i i-*lS
\J
1 ' Noon' 1
i
:
V'
'i
t *
:' I
: \
\
^
Noon
<,
V
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
X
Q
fe
O
O 20H
o
10-
' fjoon I Noon ' I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/08/87 03/09/87 03/10/87 03/11/87 03/12/87 03/13/87 03/14/87
02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
[ WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-93
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
ง 5
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
fj
a
400-
300-
200-
100-
ANES Sampling Data: for N07-5, from N07L22TW.B02
N07-5
Noon
Noon
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1
Noon
Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O,
fc
5
0
o
20-
10-
Noon I Noon I No'on Noon I Noon Noon Noon
01/04/87 01/05/87 01/06/87 01/07/87 01/08/87 01/09/87 01/10/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-94
-------
N07-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
l |-
l ^
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700
CT
S
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data; for N07-7, from N07L26TW.B02
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
S
30H
Q
S
O
O 20-j
ง
10-
22
I' Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
- 02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-95
-------
N15-4
1800-
1600-
1400-
o _
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
e?
400-
300-
200-
100-
AUES Sampling Data: for N15-4, from N15L20TW.B02
\ !
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
. TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
o 20H
o
10-
Noon Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
02 VALUES
i AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-96
-------
N15-5
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700
G
|i
400-
300-
200-
100-
;M
) \
(
\ : v
VVl 5
i 1
Noon
i
i
*
\
^
\
r
1
*
" ! t
'' i j
vJl-
ij-
H
\
Noon
w
,
' 1 I1
\ '-III
i ' ! ':' '' '
*:J !--J '-!- "
1 ill :
1 h * . ^' i
<'i nh
v
1 ' Noon ' 1
I
>
'-. " i
'.' '',*
!"\! !'v
U i r
J ^
i
\
V
Noon
i
1 - :, ' c
' * . ' 'i< .* .1,*.
^ i) g ". -;i !''i
^ ;! ; , < J i i /' /ฃ " '!<"
.! '! ป: 5 : 7t !'" , ^*> *! -!
S \| i \ '. ;j <> : r:::1!' :;';-'. "; ; '
'. ' ***" j/ I V ' ^ ',- ! i 1 ' ' !'ป'"!
)i \! ' : i , fs ,:j ^ :! i
\ \ ' ? ::
V ; ^
1 Noon 1 Noon I Noon
01/18/87 01/19/87 01/20/87 01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O 20-|
O
10-
22-
10-
6-
2-
.1 ,y.. h-.'v .--..I'
I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon 1 Noon
01/18/87 01/19/87 01/20/87 01/21/87 01/22/87 01/23/87 01/24/87
-02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
-------
N15-7
AWES Sampling Data: for N15-7, from N15L24TW.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
ET -
1
a
800-
600-
400-
200-
"
900-
800-
700-
G-
a .
ง
u
a '
400-
300-
200-
100-
1 it :
\ i i . .
M : I j \\ I , 1
I ' :":*>'.' '$. '. '. ]' :> : '. !; !; ;
': : 1 *:';] : ';;"; ii i^< ^: ;''':$ ' i :^ ; :: ;)j \.:!;i ?1 ^.
s ; \ : ':' ! > ( : i :: t ; '.< A ' 'J - ; ' ', ' 1; ' \ ^ !''.! i "l ;
v ^ ^ ^: v, \i : \: v
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon ' Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
TCS1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
te
o
o
20-
10-
22
18
14-
ฃ
r-J
o
10-
6-
2-
HB HIM HI
Noon Noon I Noon Noon Noon Noon Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-98
-------
N16-4
AWES Sampling Data: for N16-4, from N16L20TW.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
ง ST -
H S3
< g
a a
ID g
1 M "
| ฐ
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800-
700-
G-
(/I
S '
OH
s
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
j
5 L
> i ป i- ^ '
: -i I: J i M^ l-.-^l' i .Nl^ ! .; ji ; ifi !
i Mr 1$1 ^ R ii\H\ ftH ' Fl i
\ : ' w \ ' \*i \ ' ป ' "*i' ' *-i \ ! *r * V V \ ! ^
V*v\ * t ' * V V * * \ V ^
_" v ' "x^
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
12/07/86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ง
Q
O
8 20H
o
10-
Noon 1 Noon I .Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
12/0 /86 12/08/86 12/09/86 12/10/86 12/11/86 12/12/86 12/13/86
- 02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
I WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-99
-------
N16-6
AWES Sampling Data: for N16-6, from N16L23TW.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
3
r C/J
tu
*ฃ [Tl
a 2
1 S-
p ฐ
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800'
700-
G
a
ง
G
W
S '
400-
300-
200-
100-
'^ '.',
ij:- , ; <
!;*!;!'ป $ . : ji - ! * 5
J i .! \ :=. ^ . , ; i j i ;:ii i i 1 < ' ' -i;
^lijU :^1ii\^yy\ ^^iP'1! ^:i Ji:l ^yn ilh ^!
VA;'^ ^' ' M"! liy1'^^ ' u;1 v \H^:-?:''^ ^\U1
- \ p ,.-p
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
02/15/87 02/16/87 02/17/87 02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 3(H
Q
o 20H
o
10-
22-
Nobn I Noon I Noon I Noon ' Noon I Noon I Noon
02/15/87 02/16/87 02/17/87 02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87
02 VALUES
i AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-100
-------
N16-7
AWES Sampling Data; for N16-7, from N16L24TH.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
er-
S2
ง
a-
Q
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800'
700-
a
tS
s
g
e
400-
300-
200-
100-
i . ^ ;
.1 : ;;! ''.' ii \ | j- i ^ C ;I
I { . v' ' ' 5 :. ? ; ฃ i ^- ^ ! IT, ' i i ;i '. :-'; - t. b
\ :'\^'M n?l \ A\' Vjiii = 14J^ ^ i '^1 :; -^"^
W ' \3 ' ? \^ :' * \ ' ' \*' ^ \ M * : ^ ' *i ฅ^ JT \ "' ' M'-i^V ' "^ v ''
( \ * v \ '/V V % \i ^v' V ^S; H*
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30-
O
I
O 20-|
o
10-
I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
- 02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D--101
-------
V06-1
AWES Sampling Data: for V06-1, from V06T02SH.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
Ll]
- sr -
ฃ ฎ
i s
CL, O _
5 Q
H
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
(j
a .
s
o
a)
& -
400-
300-
200-
100-
,
\ '
1
~
ฃ
V
\.
; .".
^
! ; ]
! '
'; -'I';
1 \ '<
' V
i '
Noon
:;
^ >
: i
!
; '
: :': :
:: ::-
" '.''. ':'
' ' ^ ' ''!'
' :;^ !
''.' :; i :'
IVi^
Noon
. '
1
/
'!
-
\
\
i
\
\:
* i"%
1 V'|
VJ
Noon
i.
j ;
V ;
. :: I
j ' ;
'" z
\ ' I"!1
N ' u1
"* . ]!
|i!" II
-;' ' I
-!i' ; '-
1 ''. ''. !:
w
Noon 1
.
_
,
V
0.
\
\
'f
l\
!': '
:h' ''
1 i
[!
i -
i j;|
'" i " <
', ' t %
( i -i J
: i :- ;
1 '' V "i ^
i . \ * i
Noon 1 Noon
]
1
J
! I '
i ! ?: .
i :'
^ :;
! '
i {. i
. ti i i?
".I1 ' '!
'"' 'j ' ' v
\ t" \ ^ i| !
\i Y
Noon
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
30H
o 20H
o
22-
Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I ' Noon' I Noon
01/07/86 01/08/86 01/09/86 01/10/86 01/11/86 01/12/86 01/13/86
-02 VALUES
t AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-102
-------
V06-2
1800-
1600-
1400-
Q
**"
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800
700-
&
S3
400
300
200
100
J
;!
.>
x
j i
;
'll
Noon
,
;i
J *
i;
i
*,
;:!'
J .
!* ^ ^
1 ; '
V I
V
1 ซ
i
\
oon
i . ,'
1 1 /
\ 1*
j- . ' ' 1
i ';!
, -*" *
i -i*
* i -
f: i
' \ \
\ \
\ V
i Noon
'
$
V
if
1
J
^
' /*
')
\
;
';
;
, j
X
\
N
i
oon
ij
j^
!i.
"I
I '
i
i
? \
:
1 '
l
U
*!
ฃ
^
r'
" L
;
*
;
\
V
Noon
;
I
J
f
|(
|'t
|l
1
\
i
\
.
;
i
f i
*
i s
ป
;
: ;
J
; i
i J,
': :;i
.'1
*;
I '" '1
j ' '!
\|i \
Noon' 1 ' N
>
-i
i
\ i
i
ii
oo r
r
a
i
:
*
' ':
! "
i_
i
02/09/86 02/10/86 02/11/86 02/12/86 02/13/86 02/14/86 02/15/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30-
Q
ฃ
O
Q
O
O
20-
10-
22
18-
14
10
6-
2-
i i
' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/09/86 02/10/86 02/11/86 02/12/86 02/13/86 02/14/86 02/15/86
02 VALUES l lAUX. HEAT USE i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-103
-------
V06-5
AWES Sampling Data: for V06-5, from V06T22JS.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
jง ฃT -
HC/J
CD
< s
K (V
HJ g
|a"
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
e?
CO
PJ
c;
& '
400-
300-
200-
100-
.' - !
' 1 *
' ' ; *
:: |f: !i
s ' i
s
; \\\
i /.j '
J-. i !
: n. % i
t- i i,
V i i
V1^!
Noon 1 Noon
j
!i
!! (
' 5
''.'. ?
v "
; ^ 1 ;
,i \ i j
x ' / J
\ J '
?f\l
1 ' Noon ' 1
i
,
1
i
i
\
' \
Noon
*f
: * ;.
> <( !
f I! '
\ ; ^ '
\ ; \ ;i
1 Noon
/ ;
' ;
: s
i rf i.
.' \ "
;l
f
;.
1
\
\
i .;
':'
^ 'l '
** . '
\ I1 ' :: ,*: "
^y
oon 1 Noon
-
^
> '.
v' .
' -.
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30-
o
w
Q
O 20-
o
10-
22-
18-
14-
10-
6-
2-
Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon '
12/14/86 12/15/86 12/16/86 12/17/86 12/18/86 12/19/86 12/20/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
HOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-104
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
\ |-
\ e
H
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
G
12 .
ง
o
B
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for V06-6, from V06T24JS.B02
1
i
i
,
\ ;
1 ;!
V
'
y
p.
S
.^
.
'
\ . i
i
i
\
i :'.
V
i -
k ;
,
' i j ;
{
^
.
T
\ i
!\
': V
7!
7 .
' ^ i
-. ?:
's '
"' 5
iii i
i!? $ \
]& \
! . ;
i P ' 1
I1. L1' ? 'l
.; 'i ;!': ; -; !"
.} j| I | | .. li
: :j:Jf '; ;! j i^ !
: ;!:< .1; 5 ' t ?
',' 'tf'f, j" J"" ;
': ici:; J*. 5-i! h
i ^ii i H .if?
i ' 1 : C \ ' i ! $ !
* *i i * i '. \ ป I' :
' \ '. I l \ * V
? V t \.v \
f \ N^ \
" ri
* :
:E
'r
\ '
i \ ' I
" V
;
*j
X
?! \
' \ 'i
: : v?
'?
. ', ^>
! ' ! t*!
;i ' 1 '": '
li ! ''
I\ n :
|f \iH
^ \
i
k)
V
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
V06-6
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
s
ฃ 30H
Q
ฃ
a
O 20H
o
10-
' Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
01/25/87 01/26/87 01/27/87 01/28/87 01/29/87 01/30/87 01/31/87
-02 VALUES
. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-105
-------
V09-1
AHES Sampling Data: for V09-1, from V09T02SH.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
^ G -
[ i 1/i
TEMPERS
(DEO RE
1
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
U
c^
;i) .
(DEGREI
400-
300-
200-
100-
!< '
i\ /
: ji -i
' :?i i"
;;'^ :j
.' ' ? : .
s . . . ^
\ "
1 i '
Noon
^
^
i i'
; .: ป 'i'- i
| , / ^ I A. '** '
1 :, ! "" Jr ' ! ' -^!
; 1 i| '' $'': 1 : ' ^ i
i' ; i; ; V? ; jl; :. , ; ~*- '
.' \ v:J 'i^ซ' ' -i ~ ' ' ป
: : 5. .^ _{ : ^-v '. \ A ' \ : \ '*
1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
;
\ >
I ;
j i
j ;
\ !;
'v ' - ''
'" '<.'
1 ' : i
i '. i'"1
VjM\
1 Noon
(
^
1 '
. ,
" <
:.^
ป * !'
- ^:'
'i
' ' i1 :(
'I
Noo
}'
i:
\ฃ
%
\
n'
1,
"i
I
V
-
^
~
~ f
11 "i '^
j' *'i -'J-
? -i;'::
' :
!T \ ^
h
^oon
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
b
o
uj
3:
o
o
3:
10-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon Noon Noon Noon
01/26/86 01/27/86 01/28/86 01/29/86 01/30/86 01/31/86 02/01/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-106
-------
AWES Sampling Data; for V14-1, from V14L01SH.HEX
V14-1
1800-
1600-
1400-
ฃ
Ht/J
Mrl
ง3 UJ ~
1 a
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
a .
o
w
400-
300-
200-
100-
,
; . j . . \ |, . ! :
:: !;. '^! ; s |^ ;i ! i -;A. :}>;$ ii^:i;l:;^! ? !i?^ .M'':li *.^ -:ป
iiy-% i iHiwypttif (\\^i \ ftjfiyif
'^ 'V^'r!' V !* ' "s" ^'?
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
01/26/86 01/27/86 01/28/86 01/29/86 01/30/86 01/31/86 02/01/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
O
X
3M
o
O 20H
o
10-
22
18
14-
10-
6-
IHI M I 181 I I II
1 ,' ' " ,"'." ""'-%
I ft
'
I I
I II
Noon Noon Noon Noon I Noon I Noon
01/26/86 01/27/86 01/28/86 01/29/86 01/30/86 01/31/86 02/01/86
- 02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
l HOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-107
-------
V14-2
AWES Sampling Data: for V14-2, from V14L04SH.HEX
1800-
1600-
1400-
65 ฃT -
ง ฎ
2 S
S o _
t3 UJ
IB
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
G
GREES
DJ
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
'$ I & '( ; ' ' '-
; ." ": 'i'.' ' * '' i :' ^ Hi :
" i '; !' :'. .". : :i] % i j'1!' ': ; '-I {.-
;. ,; ^ :V> : i IM ; i /A; : 'i: i-' v:^
'\: Vr ^ v\; i' S: : V; 'f ' V \? !;' Vx.
"C >"V C/' '' '' >
' ^
Noon I Noon Noc
1 ;
j
' ' j : ป I I " ,
? ''"' ."' ; ''i ^
j i : * !'; !;! .*; i ; : :. :' '^ ; i' <
'if : '*' \ Y ^ 'i ,i i ? ; i '-> ; ;. fซ. .; r
;' ^ ^ ' " \jVV~ Vj 'V^'':{ ? -^
v i?lv V V '
n 1 Noon 1 Noon
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
8 20H
o
10-
2-
Nobn I No'on I Noon Noon I Noon
02/26/86 02/27/86 02/28/86 03/01/86 03/02/86
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-108
-------
V14-3
1800-
1600-
1400-
rrl
TEMPERATURl
(DEGREES F)
I i
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
(DEGREES q
400'
300-
200-
100-
i
i i ? '-
* 1 * ". '
iliiliMiil ij |j \.
"^^"^^'V^V^^fV
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon ' Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30-
Q
fe
O
O 20H
o
10-
22
18-
6-
I ll
I ii
H i
f
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/23/86 03/24/86 03/25/86 03/26/86 03/27/86 03/28/86 03/29/86
-02 VALUES
l AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-109
-------
N08-4
1600-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
700-
400-
300-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N08-4, from N08T2QTW.B02
':"- V
' -f.'vV
|j; f?j'^5Vj;
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon
Noon
30H
:>
Q
20-
10-
11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86 11/30/86
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) - TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
22-
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
Noon
r
Noon
11/25/86 11/26/86 11/27/86 11/28/86 11/29/86 11/30/86
02 VALUES i lAUX. HEAT USE i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-110
-------
N08-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
GT-
1.
ttS
800-
600-
400-
200-
900'
800-
700-
O
BJ
Q
400-
300-
200-
100-
! i i H:: !
r. ; ^ ^ :':ซ ฃ r
< ti '' ' 1 ' j ) ' J ?< ' f I i ^ .
ป ; J ( i : '> : * '{" ; * : .
* F ' i ^ ?. :.f ซf or ; .*! :":' : s
'-,'- < i, ij v ;>: !ฃ : ->; j ' :;:: =5 \t -.
$ M 'H 1 !?il sl.i 1 ^\ ! M II \:' M
, i 'i \ ' ^ !: ' ' ;;';^ I'vi- * >it: \ -|i i r^ ' V ' ^ ' i '^} ';->r
i '\ \. \ ;i\f 5 \ !iii;i'V^ ?\;i \ ' H ^ >i ' iU \ ii [ N
\ ' \ '' : 1 'i ' ' ' ^ ' ' . *( V : I
M1 ' : \ \ ' I* ' \ ; ' ' I'
V
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
02/01/87 02/02/87 02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
ฃ 30~
Q
s
O
8 20-1
10-
22-
NoonINoon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/0 /8702/02/87 02/03/87 02/04/87 02/05/87 02/06/87 02/07/87
-02 VALUES
lAUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-lll
-------
N08-7
1800-
1600-
1400-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
400-
300-
200-
100-
AWES Sampling Data: for N08-7, from N08T24TW.B02
!;! \
> '. ' J,
' ฐ ' \- \ t
'!:!; : '
' '* i ' ^
' :: 'i :' '
\: "* j ]^\\ ' \
' ^ : V
Noon 1
U h
\ ^ '
; (^. '
' '. ', c.
: ' ; - v
If ;
Noon
^ i '
^ i v
' '' i -I
:. ' - v. ' > 4 ':
: -K. - /.
! :pj : /: ^ i : jj I . f JM !'i
'*/'?. ''''': :t:i. ' ป: : ,: : : ;, ''. ii:
i i'- ~J ' ' > i '" ' k! V ' i '' ' !k ^ ^''
' ?>: 1 ;M : H;^ : :H : i s.: *:\ ; ,. M
: i' v^ ^> : ' 'i ^ i vf: \ &' :: ? ffi i
11 ^vr i \^!\^\
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1
/
\ : ,
> ! .
:; - :: '.
' t ''''
~> ' '.',
* i '
*'i i ' ;!
1 '-l\ :|
'V
Noon
40-
o
53
O 20-|
O
10-
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
TC#1 (STACK) TC#2 (CATALYST) TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
22-
18-
Nobn Noon I Noon I Noon Noon I Noon I Noon
03/01/87 03/02/87 03/03/87 03/04/87 03/05/87 03/06/87 03/07/87
02 VALUES
i AUX. HEAT USE
WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-112
-------
N14-6
1800-
1600-
1400-
ฃ7**
a"
800-
600-
400-
200-
900
800-
700-
s
8-
400-
300-
200-
100-
i ! i j . ; , : i
ti I : \ i - i: ;: ; i ฃ :. I ; t. v .'.'. -,
::;jii: jjc ;::';;,: tt f;; jj ; 1 ;; J: i ( ;?: ;; ;; . fe :; i ; ^ j r
'-'5* ^1 r^ i'- - '= ^i 'i'^ fe U^ r\ ^; ^'-Kr.A :::: ';.';:. ?ฃ ii;- :1 v ^s'
jl ''IjH^M; ''fr^^f^fW'^'f^V^lfl^
y ' \
Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
02/15/87 02/16/87 02/17/87 02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
Q
ฃ
O
O 20-|
O
10-
22
Noon Noon ' I Noon I Noon I Noon 1 Noon
02/15/87 02/16/87 02/17/87 02/18/87 02/19/87 02/20/87 02/21/87
- 02 VALUES
AUX. HEAT USE
l WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-113
-------
N14-7
AWES Sampling Data: for N14-7, from N14T24TW.B02
1800-
1600-
1400-
| tr -
ii
|ง-
800-
600-
400-
200-
900-
800-
700-
G
S -
a
ง
& '
400-
300-
200-
100-
h i . * ; ;. ' \ ,
1 '<') ( 2 i \. . '
i ';;!" :: :?; "il f'J ^i :'N t ;jj. .* .V. j j'.c _ ; ;: $* /; ;. f- '
-:t : !?:& -^ ';. ' ^l'''!;"< '": C*": 'i :>>''''V; ::i-' !;% : -j^-^ 'i,\;;-M l1/-^. .fif
r- ' * " ' \ -^V \ 1 H \ ''>', ,'\' '^rt ' \-l-f ' ' LJ' A :L ' / .'i * ';'' !' j: it rK1 ' l'!^ ;
I ' V '* V ' ' *' i \JJ ^ ' r *" i^ . \I i 'i I1 I 'ฃf '. : ! ~ ! '..' ' * ' V s \
\v* i, ~ ^ "^ 'i i ' '-1 :^' ' 'j 't !' :> A j ' *' \ i r ' ^ ' ^ * \J 1
"Hx v ^ ;\ ' \: ^ i! ซ ^ \ \ *
V < ' \
Noon I Noon ' Noon Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon I Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30-
O 20-
10-
22
18
14-
ฃ
(N
O
10-
6-
2-
Hoon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
03/15/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/19/87 03/20/87 03/21/87
02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
i WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-114
-------
1800-
1600-
1400-
- a"
S tjj
sl-
o a
^
800-
600-
400-
200-
AWES Sampling Data; for N16-1, from N16T03m.HEX
N16-1
900
800'
700'
u
3
c2
o
ID
Q,
400-
300-
200-
100-
(
..
;! /
'. i
' "
| '.
''. L ;
\'t '
''. ' ' '
\
Noon
j
i *
i . :'
J J , -
: > i ; '
> :': : i'.J . ^ ?
" ': :', *;;' !: ?-::: 1. ;.
' '. j ': !' 'ป-v *'j :
!; .;:;;; ji; |:f5;^;
! ;': :' ; *''.' 'I' V -v*-i '^
;. ;j ';' ';< ' | i I; : 'j-''l ij
l'|:VI!'?i
*\
1
1 Noon 1 Noon
;. i
'; }
*
* !
>. . .
' '; .. '*
' Jซ! " s
r^.'!. ;.'.''
;:;;:; j Si;:
;T ",| ^ /J-l'i
;v j': ^r jj\;i
t; ^
Noon
t
J
7
)
] 1 !!
:, , ! i?"
'!- ! |" ' -;'- : ;
-''' ? .; : :: : I :
I ง j5 ' ฃi ;; i| !!
' / !r-.\ ' .'.* ^ il(. t! %' !'
' ^ 5 * V '>' "-;J! !'t! ^ '' '
; $ J ;? ''! i- y j i;
vy^'Yv
1 Noon 1 Noon 1 Noon
02/02/86 02/03/86 02/04/86 02/05/86 02/06/86 02/07/86 02/08/86
TC#1 (STACK)
TC#2 (CATALYST)
TC#3 (PRE-CAT)
40-
30H
O 20H
o
10-
22
18
14-
10-
6-
2-
II
118
"l
I
H i
f\ ',-.* '/ -V
__ ^
Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon I Noon
02/02/86 02/03/86 02/04/86 02/05/86 02/06/86 02/07/86 02/08/86
- 02 VALUES
I AUX. HEAT USE
! WOOD SCALE MEASUREMENTS
D-115
-------
For further information
on NYSERDA reports or
publications contact:
Department of Communications
NYS Energy Research and
Development Authority
Two Rockefeller Plaza
Albany, N.Y. 12223
(518) 465-6251
-------
Energy Authority Report 87-26, Vol. II
State of New York Mario M. Cuomo, Governor
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
William D. Cotter, Chairman Irvin L. White, President
------- |