D
                 LT
 REVIEW OF COLOR WASTE LOADS
 AND COLOR TECHNOLOGIES FOR
       BLEACHED KRAFT MILLS
                PREPARED FOR THE
         U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL
         PROTECTION  AGENCY
EFFLUENT GUIDELINES  DIVISION
                        BY THE
          EDWARD C. JORDAN CO., INC.
                 PORTLAND, MAINE
           CONTRACT NO-  68-01--3287
                  DECEMBER 1978

-------
                              NOTICE
The attached document is a DRAFT REPORT.  It includes technical in-
formation and recommendations submitted by the Contractor (E.G. Jordan
Company) to the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA")
regarding the subject industry.  It is being distributed for review and
comment only.  The report is not an official EPA publication and it has
not been reviewed by the Agency.

The report, including the recommendations, will be undergoing extensive
review by EPA, Federal and State agencies, public interest organizations
and other interested groups and persons during the coming weeks.  The
report, and in particular the contractor's recommended effluent limita-
tions, guidelines and standards of performance, is subject to change in
any and all respects.

The regulations to be published by EPA under Sections 301, 304 (b) and
306 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, will be
based to a large extent on the report and the comments received on it.
However, pursuant to Sections 301, 304 (b) and 306 of the Act, EPA will
also consider additional pertinent technical and economic information
which is developed in the course of review of this report by the public
and within EPA.  Upon completion of the review process, and prior to
final promulgation of regulations, an EPA report will be issued setting
forth EPA's conclusions concerning the subject industry, effluent limit-
ations, guidelines and standards of performance applicable to such
industry.  Judgments necessary to promulgation of regulations under
Sections 301, 304 (b) and 306 of the Act, of course, remain the res-
ponsibility of EPA.   Subject to these limitations, EPA is making this
draft contractor's report available in order to encourage the widest
possible participation of interested persons in the decision-making
process at the earliest possible time.

The report shall have standing in any EPA proceeding or court proceeding
only to the extent that it represents the views of the Contractor who
studied the subject industry and prepared the information and recom-
mendations.  It cannot be cited, referenced or represented in any res-
pect in any such proceedings as a statement of EPA's views regarding the
subject industry.
                                   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                                   Office of Water Planning and Standards
                                   Effluent Guidelines Division
                                   Washington, DC  20460

-------
                             ABSTRACT









In an effort to improve the information and data base on color waste




loads from bleached kraft and soda paper mills, the U.S. Environmental




Protection Agency contracted with the Edward C. Jordan Co., Inc. to




perform the following tasks:









1.   Review available information and data regarding technology for the




     control of color;




2.   Obtain color waste load data through sampling and analysis programs




     at 26 bleached kraft and soda mills;




3.   Review and analyze the color measurement analytical techniques used




     by some of the mills through use of a split sampling program;




4.   Update the proposed Best Available Technology Economically Achiev-




     able (BATEA) effluent color limitations for the bleached kraft and




     soda subcategories based upon (1) identification of a color re-




     duction technology representing BATEA, and (2) the color waste load




     data collected during the sampling surveys, updated literature




     reviews, equipment manufacturer's data, and historical mill data;




5.   Calculate costs and energy requirements of application of the BATEA




     technology for model mills.









This report presents the results of the work done on the above tasks




since September, 1975.  Based upon the data gathered during the project




from the sources previously mentioned, BATEA effluent color discharge




for the average day conditions are presented and a color reduction




technology representing BATEA is identified.

-------
Three subcategories for color effluent limitations were recommended as




follows:




1.   Bleached kraft (fine kraft,  market kraft, and BCT kraft);




2.   Dissolving kraft;  and




3.   Soda.




The report also recommends use of bleached pulp production for cal-




culating a mill's total color load.








The color control technology identified consists of a minimum lime




treatment process applied on the first caustic extraction effluent.








Supportive data and the data analysis for development of the average day




effluent discharge, and identifying and costing the BATEA color reduction




technology are contained in this report.
                                -ii-

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS


Section                          Title                      Page No.

I.        CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 	  1-1

          A.   SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS	1-1
          B.   SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 	  1-9

               1.   BATEA Color Reduction Technology. . .  .  1-9
               2.   BATEA Effluent Color Discharge
                      (Average Day)	1-11

II.        INTRODUCTION	II-l

          A.   PROJECT OBJECTIVES 	  II-l
          B.   METHODS USED FOR.DATA COLLECTION 	  II-l
          C.   METHODS USED FOR PROCESSING DATA .......  II-5

III.      DATA SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS	III-l

          A.   HISTORICAL MILL DATA VERSUS COLOR
                 SURVEY DATA	III-3
          B.   DOMINANT WAVELENGTH	III-9
          C.   SPLIT SAMPLE ANALYSIS	111-13

               1.   Introduction	111-13
               2.   Presentation of Results 	  111-16
               3.   Summary 	  111-36

          D.   RESULTS FROM MILL COLOR SURVEYS	111-39
          E.   COLOR LOAD BASED ON BLEACH PLANT
                 PRODUCTION 	  111-39
          F.   BLEACH KRAFT MILL COLOR ORIGIN 	  111-66
          G.   DATA COMPARISON 3Y SUBCATEGORY AND
                 WOOD SPECIE	111-99

               1.   Fine Kraft Subcategory. . 	  111-99
               2.   Fine and Market Kraft Mills 	  III-101
               3.   Market Kraft Subcategory	III-103
               4.   BCT Kraft Subcategory 	  III-104
               5.   BCT and Market Kraft Mills	III-106
               6.   Dissolving Kraft	III-107
               7.   Soda	III-108
               8.   Mills Utilizing Multiple Pulping and
                      Mixed Products	III-109
               9.   Summary 	  III-109

          H.   WOOD SPECIE	III-112

               1.   Wood Specie's Effect on Color from
                      Bleach Plant	III-112

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
                              (Continued)
Section                          Title                      Page No.

               2.   Wood Specie's Effect on Total Color at
                      the Secondary Treatment Influent. . .  III-119

          I.   ANALYSIS OF BLEACHING SEQUENCES	III-123

               1.   Rationale for Categorization	III-125
               2.   Bleaching Factors Investigation ....  III-125
                    a.   Bleaching Sequence within
                           Group B	III-126
                    b.   Chlorine Application 	  III-126
                    c.   Hypochlorite Application 	  III-127
               3.   Discussion of Sequence Variables.  . . .  III-127
                    a.   Bleaching Sequence
                           Discussion .  .  	  III-128
                    b.   Chlorine Application
                           Discussion 	  III-129
                    c.   Hypochlorite Application
                           Discussion 	  III-132

          J.   INTERNAL PARAMETERS COMPARISON .......  III-135

               1.   Selection of Variables	III-135
                    a.   Wood Species	III-136
                    b.   Degree of Pulping ("K" or
                           KAPPA Numbers)  	  III-136
                    c.   Brown Stock Washing Efficiency
                           (Overall)	III-136
                    d.   White Liquor Sulfidity 	  III-137
                    e.   Bleaching Sequence and
                           Application	III-137
                    f.   Chlorine Application 	  III-138
                    g.   Bleach Extraction Stage ("K" or
                           KAPPA Numbers)  	  III-138
                    h.   Type of Chlorine Dioxide
                           Generation 	  III-138
                    i.   Type of Hypochlorite Used	III-138
                    j.   Final Pulp Brightness	III-139
               2.   Data Collection 	  III-139
               3.   Discussion of Relationship
                      Investigations	III-139
                    a.   Wood Species	III-140
                    b.   Degree of Pulping	III-142
                    c.   Brown Stock Washing	III-145
                    d.   White Liquor Sulfidity 	  III-148
                    e.   Bleaching Sequence 	  III-151
                    f.   Chlorine Application .......  III-151

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
                              (Continued)
Section                          Title                      Page No.

                    g.   Bleach Plant Control (As Caustic
                           Stage "K" Number)	III-151
                    h.   Type of Chlorine Dioxide
                           Generation 	  III-153
                    i.   Type of Hypochlorite	III-153
                    j.   Final Pulp Brightness  	  III-155

          K.   SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 	  III-155

               1.   Historical Mill Data	III-157
               2.   Dominant Wavelength 	  III-157
               3.   Split Sample Analysis 	  III-157
               4.   Color Load Based on Bleach Plant
                      Production	III-158
               5.   Bleached Kraft Mill Color Origin. . .  .  III-158
               6.   Data Comparison by Subcategory and
                      Wood Specie 	  III-159
               7.   Wood Species	III-159
               8.   Analysis of Bleaching Sequences  ....  III-160
               9.   Internal Parameters Comparison	III-160

IV.       LITERATURE AND EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING
            INFORMATION	IV-1

          A.   LITERATURE SUMMARY	  IV-1

               1.   Coagulation and Precipitation 	  IV-1
               2.   Activated Carbon Adsorption 	  IV-26
               3.   Activated Alumina Adsorption	IV-30
               4.   Resin Separation and Ion Exchange
                      Processes	IV-34
               5.   Membrane Processes	IV-40
               6.   Flotation Process 	  IV-54
               7.   Ozone Treatment	IV-67
               8.   Amine Treatment Process 	  IV-75
               9.   Additional Color Reduction
                      Techniques	IV-82

          B.   EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING DATA	IV-86

V.        IDENTIFICATION OF THE COLOR REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY
            REPRESENTING BATEA	V-l

          A.   PRELIMINARY EVALUATION 	  V-l

               1.   Minimum Lime	V-l
               2.   Lime and Ferric Chloride	V-6

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
                              (Continued)
Section                          Title                      Page No.

               3.   Lime - Magnesia Process	V-7
               4.   Chemicals Studied to Replace Lime . .  .  V-7
               5.   Activated Carbon Adsorption 	  V-8
               6.   Activated Alumina Adsorption	V-9
               7.   Resin Separation and Ion Exchange
                      Processes	V-9
               8.   Membrane Processes	V-ll
               9.   Alum Coagulation and Recovery	V-12
              10.   Flotation Processes 	  V-12
              11.   Ozone Treatment	V-13
              12.   Amine Treatment Process 	  V-13
              13.   Other Color Reduction Techniques. . .  .  V-15

          B.   FINAL EVALUATION - IDENTIFICATION OF A TECH-
                 NOLOGY REPRESENTING BATEA	V-15

               1.   Stage of Color Reduction Technology
                      Development	V-18
               2.   Operational Problems Experienced. . .  .  V-19
               3.   Total Operating Cost	V-20
               4.   Wastewater Streams Treated	V-22
               5.   Color Reduction Efficiency	V-23

          C.   BATEA TECHNOLOGY 	  V-24

VI.       RECOMMENDED BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE -
            AVERAGE DAY .	  .  VI-1

          A.   LOGIC FOR PAPERGRADE SINGLE BLEACHED KRAFT
                 COLOR LIMITATIONS	VI-4
          B.   RATIO:  100 PERCENT SOFTWOOD TO 100 HARD-
                 WOOD PULP BLEACHED	VI-8
          C.   METHOD USED TO CALCULATE BATEA EFFLUENT
                 COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY)	VI-10
          D.   BLEACHED KRAFT SUBCATEGORY 	  VI-12
          E.   DISSOLVING KRAFT SUBCATEGORY 	  VI-16
          F.   SODA SUBCATEGORY	VI-21
          G.   SUMMARY	VI-24

VII.      COST FOR COLOR REDUCTION AT MODEL MILLS -
            BATEA	VII-1

          A.   BASIS FOR MINIMUM LIME TREATMENT COSTS . .  .  VII-2
          B.   MODEL MILLS	VII-4
          C.   AVERAGE FLOWS	VII-5
          D.   CAPITAL COSTS	VII-7

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
                              (Continued)
Section
                       Title
Page No.
VIII.

IX.

X.
E.   ANNUAL OPERATION COSTS 	  VII-9

     1.   Operator and Maintenance Labor	VII-9
     2.   Energy Requirements 	  VII-10
     3.   Chemical Cost	VII-12

F.   SUMMARY	VII-14

REFERENCES	VIII-1

BIBLIOGRAPHY	IX-1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	X-l

APPENDICES

I.   FIELD DATA RECORDING SHEETS

II.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EFFLUENT
       GUIDELINES COLOR SURVEY FORM

III. PRODUCTION DATA SUMMARY FORM

IV.  COLOR DATA SUMMARY FORM

V.   SPLIT SAMPLE RESULTS FORM

VI.  EPA COLOR SURVEY SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
       QUESTIONNAIRE

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES


Table                            Title                           Page No.


  1       COMPARISON OF MILL PRODUCTION FOR DATA YEAR
            WITH COLOR SURVEY PERIOD	III-4

  2       DOMINANT WAVELENGTHS	111-10

  3       MILL COLOR ANALYSIS PROCEDURES	111-18

  4       SUMMARY COMPUTER PROGRAM RESULTS FOR SPLIT
            SAMPLES 	 111-19

  5       SUMMARY COMPUTER PROGRAM RESULTS FOR SELECTED
            SPLIT SAMPLES 	 111-37

  6       MILL LOCATION CODE FOR REPORTING COLOR SURVEY
            DATA	111-40

  7       COLOR BY NCASI METHOD AT ALL SAMPLE LOCATIONS 	 111-42

  8       COLOR LOAD BY SAMPLE LOCATION (kkg/day-lbs/day) .... 111-48

  9       COLOR LOAD BY SAMPLE LOCATION (kg/kkg-lbs/ton)	 111-56

 10       PERCENT OF TOTAL COLOR LOAD IDENTIFIED BY SOURCE. . .  . 111-97

 11       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
            FINE KRAFT	III-100

 12       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
            FINE AND MARKET KRAFT 	 III-102

 13       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
            MARKET KRAFT	III-104

 14       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
            BCT KRAFT 	 III-105

 15       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
            BCT AND MARKET KRAFT	III-107

 16       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
            DISSOLVING KRAFT	III-108

 17       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT - SODA . .  . III-108

 18       COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
            MULTIPLE PULPING, MIXED PRODUCTS	III-109

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES
                              (Continued)
Table                            Title                           Page No.
                                                           v
 19       GROUP B BLEACHING SEQUENCES 	 III-124

 20       DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES PULPED	III-141

 21       REQUIRED COAGULANT DOSAGE 	 IV-4

 22       COST OF COAGULATION	IV-5

 23       TREATMENT OF KRAFT EFFLUENTS WITH DIVALENT IONS VS.
            TREATMENT OF KRAFT EFFLUENTS WITH TRIVALENT IONS. .  . IV-10

 24       LIME TREATMENT OF KRAFT BLEACH CAUSTIC EXTRACT IN
            THE PRESENCE OF METAL ION	IV-12

 25       REMOVAL OF BOD, COD, AND PHOSPHATE AT SELECTED
            LIME-MAGNESIA LEVELS	IV-14

 26       ANNUAL COSTS OF LIME AND LIME-MAGNESIA TREATMENT.  . .  . IV-17

 27       ANNUAL COSTS OF LIME AND LIME-MAGNESIA TREATMENT
            (SUPPORTING DATA FOR TABLE 26)	IV-18

 28       SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 	 IV-20

 29       ANALYSIS OF TREATED AND FINAL EFFLUENTS 	 IV-27

 30       REVERSE OSMOSIS OF BLEACH PLANT EFFLUENT	IV-47

 31       EXTRAPOLATED OPERATING COSTS	IV-67

 32       FINAL EFFLUENT PROPERTIES ACHIEVED AT MILL A	 IV-69

 33       EFFLUENT PROPERTIES ACHIEVED AT MILL B	IV-71

 34       EFFLUENT PROPERTIES ACHIEVED AT MILL C	IV-71

 35       EFFLUENT PROPERTIES AT RECYCLED BOARD MILL	IV-72

 36       DAILY OZONE REQUIREMENTS	IV-72

 37       DAILY OPERATING, CAPITAL INVESTMENT, AND
            TREATMENT COSTS, 1974	IV-74

 38       OZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR COLOR REDUCTION OF
            SELECTED PULP AND PAPER MILL EFFLUENTS	IV-74

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES
                              (Continued)
Table                            Title                           Page No.

 39       EFFLUENT IRRADIATIONS WITH LIME AND HYPOCHLORITE
            TREATMENTS	IV-85

 40       INVENTORY OF EXTERNAL COLOR REDUCTION
            TECHNOLOGIES	V-2

 41       COMPARISON OF COLOR REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY COSTS	V-21

 42       SUMMARY OF BATEA COLOR REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY
            ANALYSIS	V-25

 43       RATIO:  100 PERCENT SOFTWOOD TO 100 PERCENT HARDWOOD
            PULP BLEACHED	VI-9

 44       RAW WASTE BOD DETERMINATIONS	VI-11

 45       DETERMINATION OF AVERAGE COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY
            TREATMENT INFLUENT BLEACHED KRAFT 	 VI-13

 46       BLEACHED KRAFT PERCENT SOFTWOOD PULP	VI-14

 47       BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY)
            BLEACHED KRAFT	VI-17

 48       CALCULATED BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE
            DAY) BLEACHED KRAFT MILLS SURVEYED	VI-18

 49       BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY)
            DISSOLVING KRAFT	VI-22

 50       SUMMARY BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE
            DAY)	VI-25

 51       AVERAGE FLOW DETERMINATION	VII-6

 52       COST SUMMARY FOR MODEL MILLS	VII-16

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES


Figure                           Title                           Page No.

   1      DOMINANT WAVELENGTH PROBABILITY CURVE
            SECONDARY INFLUENT	III-ll

   2      DOMINANT WAVELENGTH PROBABILITY CURVE
            FINAL EFFLUENT	111-12

   3      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 102 	 111-20

   4      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 103 	 111-21

   5      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 107 	 111-22

   6      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 108 	 111-23

   7      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 110 	 111-24

   8      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 114 	 111-25

   9      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 117 	 111-26

  10      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 119 	 111-27

  11      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 121 	 111-28

  12      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 125 	 111-29

  13      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 127 	 111-30

  14      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 134 	 111-31

  15      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 136 	 111-32

  16      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 140 	 111-33

  17      SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION LINES, MILL 152 	 111-34

  18      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (#/DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 100	111-69

  19      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 101	111-70

  20      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (#/DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 102	111-71

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
                              (Continued)
Figure                           Title                           Page No.

  21      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 103	111-72

  22      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 105	111-73

  23      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 106	111-74

  24      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 107	111-75

  25      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 108	111-76

  26      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 110	111-77

  27      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 111*	111-78

  28      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 113	111-79

  29      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 114	111-80

  30      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 117	111-81

  31      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % QF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 118	111-82

  32      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 119	111-83

  33      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 121	111-84

  34      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 122	111-85

  35      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 125	111-86

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
                              (Continued)
Figure                           Title                           Page No.

  36      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 126 	 111-87

  37      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 127	111-88

  38      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 134	111-89

  39      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 136	111-90

  40      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 140	111-91

  41      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 152	111-92

  42      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 161	111-93

  43      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (///DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL
            COLOR MILL NUMBER 187	111-94

  44      COMPARISON OF SUBCATEGORIES 	 III-110

  45      SOFTWOOD VERSUS HARDWOOD AT THE FIRST CHLORINATION
            STAGE FILTRATE	III-113

  46      FIRST CHLORINATION STAGE FILTRATE 	 III-115

  47      SOFTWOOD VERSUS HARDWOOD AT THE FIRST CAUSTIC
            EXTRACT STAGE 	 III-116

  48      FIRST CAUSTIC EXTRACT STAGE 	 III-117

  49      SOFTWOOD VERSUS HARDWOOD FOR COMBINED FIRST
            CHLORINATION AND CAUSTIC EXTRACT STAGES 	 III-118

  50      COMBINED FIRST CHLORINATION AND FIRST CAUSTIC
            EXTRACT STAGES	III-120

  51      SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT	III-121

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
                              (Continued)
Figure                       .    Title                           Page No.

  52      SOFTWOOD VERSUS HARDWOOD AT THE SECONDARY
            TREATMENT INFLUENT	III-122

  53      BLEACH PLANT COLOR BLEACHING GROUP A	 II1-130

  54      BLEACH PLANT COLOR BLEACHING GROUP B	 III-131

  55      BLEACH PLANT COLOR VS. C12 USAGE	III-133

  56      BLEACHING GROUP B BLEACH PLANT COLOR VS. %
            HYPOCHLORITE USED 	 III-134

  57      PULPING ("K" NUMBER)  VS. TOTAL COLOR	III-143

  58      SCREEN ROOM OR DECKER COLOR VS. PULPING K#	 III-144

  59      BROWN STOCK WASHER LOSSES VS. SCREEN ROOM OR
            DECKER COLOR (BASED ON BLEACH PLANT PRODUCTION) .  .  . III-146

  60      SCREEN ROOM OR DECKER COLOR (HARDWOOD AND
            SOFTWOOD) 	 III-147

  61      SCREEN ROOM OR DECKER COLOR VS. SULFIDITY OF
            COOKING LIQUOR	III-149

  62      BROWN STOCK WASHER LOSSES VS. COOKING LIQUOR
            SULFIDITY 	 III-150

  63      BLEACH PLANT COLOR VS. BLEACH PLANT CONTROL
            (AS CAUSTIC STAGE "K" NUMBER) 	 III-152

  64      BLEACH PLANT COLOR VS. TYPE OF HYPOCHLORITE
            USED BLEACHING GROUPS A&B 	 III-154

  65      FINAL BRIGHTNESS VS.  BLEACH PLANT COLOR 	 III-156

  66      A PROPOSED SCHEME FOR LIME-MAGNESIA TREATMENT
            OF COMBINED KRAFT EFFLUENT	IV-15

  67      DIAGRAMS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT ELECTROLYTIC
            PROCESSES	IV-21

  68      EXPERIMENTAL ELECTROLYTIC CELL	IV-22

  69      SCHEMATIC OF PILOT PLANT	IV-25

  70      SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF THE GRANULAR ACTIVATED
            ALUMINA PROCESS FOR COLOR REMOVAL	IV-33

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
                              (Continued)
Figure                           Title                           Page No.

  71      ROHM AND HAAS RESIN PROCESS	IV-35

  72      UDDEHOLM-KAMYR RESIN PROCESS	IV-37

  73      DOW CHEMICAL COLOR REDUCTION MINI-PILOT PLANT
            UNIT	IV-39

  74      ULTRAFILTRATION FLOW DIAGRAM	IV-42

  75      ULTRAFILTRATION PILOT PLANT FLOW DIAGRAM	 IV-44

  76      REVERSE OSMOSIS OF SIMULATED BROWN STOCK WASH
            EFFLUENT	IV-48

  77      PLANNED WATER RE-USE SCHEMATIC	IV-50

  78      TYPICAL REVERSE OSMOSIS PROCESS FOR A 400 TPD
            PULP MILL	IV-53

  79      SCHEMATIC OF DISPERSED AIR FLOTATION
            "MINI-PLANT"	IV-55

  80      SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF THE ION FLOTATION EXPERIMENTAL
            APPARATUS	IV-58

  81      EFFECTS OF pH ON COLOR REMOVAL (FINE SPARGER)	IV-59

  82      EFFECTS OF pH ON COLOR REMOVAL (MEDIUM SPARGER) .... IV-60

  83      PERCENT COLOR REMOVAL VS. SURFACTANT DOSAGE 	 IV-62

  84      DOSAGE VS. PERCENT FLOTATION RECOVERY 	 IV-63

  85      PERCENT FLOTATION RECOVERY VS. AIRFLOW	IV-64

  86      PROPOSED ION FLOTATION FOR KRAFT MILL
            EFFLUENT DECOLORIZATION . . 	 IV-66

  87      OZONE GENERATION SYSTEMS	IV-68

  88      LABORATORY OZONIZATION APPARATUS	IV-70

  89      TYPICAL DECOLORIZATION TEST RESULTS WITH T-1902D
            (IN SOLTROL 170) USED AS THE TREATMENT AGENT	IV-78

  90      PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM FOR A TYPICAL AMINE TREATMENT
            PROCESS AT A 500 ADT/DAY PULP MILL	IV-80

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
                              (Continued)
Figure                           Title                           Page No.

  91      DECOLORIZATION OF KRAFT DECKER EFFLUENT IN THE
            PRESENCE OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 	 IV-84

  92      BLEACHED KRAFT BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR
            DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY) 	 VI-19

  93      DISSOLVING KRAFT BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR
            DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY)	VI-23

  94      BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY)	VI-26

  95      COST FOR TREATING BLEACH PLANT CAUSTIC EXTRACT
            FILTRATE WITH MINIMUM LIME SYSTEM	VII-8

  96      MINIMUM LIME TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. . .  . VII-11

  97      MINIMUM LIME TREATMENT ENERGY REQUIREMENTS	VII-13

  98      MINIMUM LIME TREATMENT CHEMICAL COST. .	VII-15

-------
                               SECTION I




                    CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS









A summary of the conclusions reached during the course of the color




surveys and data evaluation will be listed in this section.  After the




conclusions have been summarized the specific recommendations, such as




the BATEA average day color discharge, the color reduction technology




with the cost of that technology as well as other recommendations which




have been made as a result of this study will be presented.









A.   SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS









The conclusions which were reached as a result of the data evaluation




will be listed in the order in which they appear in the report.  Ad-




ditionally, the conclusions will be presented by the particular section




in the report they appear.  The following specific conclusions have been




made as a result of this study:









     Section III, Data Summary and Analysis









     1.   A.   Historical Mill Data Versus Color Survey Data









          As a result of a comparison of wood species pulped, bleach




          plant production and the final production between the data




          year and the 3 day survey period it was concluded that the




          color surveys were generally conducted during a period of




          normally anticipated mill operation levels.







                                   1-1

-------
2.    B.    Dominant Wavelength









     The dominant wavelengths determined for the secondary treat-




     ment system influent and the final effluent were evaluated to




     check the standard solutions of potassium chloroplatinate/cobaltous




     chloride as the basis for establishing the color of mill




     wastewaters.  The range of wavelengths encountered during the




     surveys were found to be consistent with those measured for




     the standard employed.  This assisted in providing further




     acceptance of the potassium chloroplatinate/cobaltous chloride




     solution as a color standard.









3.    C.    Split Sample Analysis








     An evaluation of the split samples for the color surveys was




     performed to determine a level of confidence associated with




     these split sample results.  It was concluded that adjusting




     the pH to 7.6 prior to analysis versus not adjusting the pH,




     which some mills that split samples did not do, was one of the




     primary factors inducing variances between the mill and




     contractor color values on the same samples.  It was determined




     that comparable results could be obtained as long as the




     analytical techniques employed are equivalent.  A statistical




     correlation, based on the split sample, was determined for the




     final effluent and applied to the 26 mills' final effluent
                           1-2

-------
     color concentration and then compared with the E.G. Jordan




     Company's results.  It was found that for the average value




     only a 1 percent difference resulted (10 mg/1).  Therefore, it




     was concluded that normally a good comparison of results was




     attained at the final effluent during the color surveys.









4.   F.   Bleached Kraft Mill Color Origin








     An evaluation of the origin of the total color discharged to




     the secondary treatment system at each of the 26 mills was




     performed to determine which specific process within the mills




     contributed the majority of the color in the wastewater.  With




     the exception of six mills (100, 111, 113, 114, 119 and 140)




     the percent of the total color identified by process was 70




     percent or higher.








     The highest contributor to the color load in the wastewater




     was determined to be the first stage caustic extraction in the




     bleach plant with an average of 45 percent of the total color.




     The decker filtrate or screen room in the pulping process was




     the second highest contributor with an average of 24 percent




     of the total color load.








5.   G.   Data Comparison by Subcategory and Wood Specie








     The preliminary evaluation of the effect that wood specie had




     on color load discharged from the 26 mills resulted in the
                              1-3

-------
     conclusion that mills pulping and bleaching softwood species




     had the largest color loads.









6.   H.   Wood Specie









     Based upon the determination made in the preliminary evalu-




     ation that the wood specie did effect the color load a more




     detailed analysis was undertaken to determine if the proposed




     color limitations should provide for a wood specie allowance.









     An analysis of softwood versus hardwood use was performed on




     the first chlorination and first caustic extraction stages of




     bleaching, and on the total color load at the secondary




     treatment system influent.  In all cases the average color




     load increased as the total percentage of softwood increased.




     The average color load at the secondary treatment influent for




     a 100 percent softwood operation was 561 Ibs/ton of pulp




     bleached, while a 100 percent hardwood operation had an




     average of 302 Ibs/ton (approximately a 2:1 ratio).








     It was concluded from this analysis that the color limitations




     should provide for a wood specie allowance.








7.   I.   Analysis of Bleaching Sequences








     Initial evaluations of the color analysis results concluded




     that significant variation in color load from bleach plant to
                             1-4

-------
bleach plant where similar species were bleached to corres-




ponding final brightnessses had taken place.  In an attempt to




identify the factors causing these variations bleaching variables




were examined for their potential to influence color generation.









Two bleaching sequence groups were established:  Group A,




which did not utilize any hypochlorite bleaching, and Group B




which did use hypochlorite in bleaching.  Hypochlorite was




selected because its use had been reported to result in




reduced color loads from the bleach plant.









Group A bleaching sequences were evaluated with no significant




conclusions reached other than the fact that a wide variation




of color was found within the group under similar operating




and geographic conditions.









Group B bleaching sequence evaluation concluded that no one




sequence showed any trend toward lower color generation.




However, Group B did show a lower average color load per ton




than Group A (237 Ibs/ton versus 452 Ibs/ton).  Therefore, it




can be concluded that bleaching sequences using hypochlorite




bleach will result in less color than sequences using no




hypochlorite, all other major parameters being similar.









The evaluation of the amount of chlorine usage per ton of




product in the first bleaching stage was performed to deter-
                     1-5

-------
     mine if this had any effect upon the color load generated.  No




     reliable statistical relationship existed between chlorine




     usage and the bleach plant effluent color.









     The amount of hypochlorite used, related to color load, was




     then evaluated.  It was concluded that use of hypochlorite in




     the bleach sequence did result in a decreased color load.  The




     percent hypochlorite used, however, was not shown to have any




     reliable relationship to the bleach plant color.  It was




     concluded that too many other factors existed at the mills to




     verify the expected decreased color load with increased




     hypochlorite use.









8.   J.   Internal Parameters Comparison









     In an attempt to identify the operating parameters that would




     cause color load variations within the same subcategory the




     following operating parameters were examined:









          (1)  Wood Species




          (2)  Degree of pulping ("K" or KAPPA numbers)




          (3)  Brown stock washing efficiency (overall)




          (4)  White liquor sulfidity




          (5)  Bleaching sequence and application




          (6)  Chlorine application
                              1-6

-------
     (7)  Bleach extraction stage ("K" or KAPPA numbers)




     (8)  Type of chlorine dioxide generation




     (9)  Type of hypochlorite used




    (10)  Final pulp brightness









Insufficient data from the color surveys on the specific wood




species (i.e., oak, gum, pine, etc.) processed was obtained to




make any conclusions on the various species.  However, as was




detailed earlier the hardwood versus softwood pulp did have




enough data to perform evaluations.









Statistical analysis of the data for the degree of pulping




(cooking) and color generation showed no apparent relation-




ship.  The brown stock washing effluent showed a trend toward




higher color load per ton of pulp as washer chemical losses




increased.








White liquor sulfidity was compared with screen room or decker




color load to determine if soluble organic sulfur compounds




formed during the cooking process had a significant effect on




color load.  The relationship between color from the screen




room or decker and the sulfidity was not judged to be sig-




nificant.








No trend was seen between bleach plant extraction stage "K"




numbers and bleach plant color.
                         1-7

-------
          An evaluation of the type of chlorine dioxide generation




          process used and the bleach plant color did not show a trend




          toward reduced color with any particular process.









          Evaluation of calcium hypochlorite versus sodium hypochlorite




          versus no hypochlorite showed, as described earlier, a sig-




          nificant decrease in color load from the bleach plant if




          hypochlorite was used.  Additionally, it was determined that




          calcium hypochlorite reduced the bleach plant color more




          effectively than sodium hypochlorite.









          The pulp brightness was evaluated against bleach plant color




          load statistically.  No reliable statistical relationship was




          found, but the data did seem to indicate a trend toward higher




          color load at higher brightness.  More data would be needed,




          however, to examine this relationship in more detail.









Based upon the conclusions (presented earlier) reached through the data




evaluation and the literature available on color reduction technologies,




specific recommendations were made on the color reduction technology




presently representing BATEA and its cost, and finally the BATEA ef-




fluent color discharge loads for the average day condition.
                               1-8

-------
B.   SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS









The specific recommendations contained in this report dealt with either




the BATEA color reduction technology, or the BATEA effluent color




limitations.  The recommendations for these two items will be presented




separately.









     1.   BATEA Color Reduction Technology








     Identification of a color reduction technology representing BATEA




     involved an evaluation of all of the external color reduction




     technologies tested to date.  The evaluation included an analysis




     of the color reduction efficiency of the technology; operational




     problems experienced; stage of technology development; wastewater




     stream or streams treated; total cost of treatment; and an analysis




     of any full scale color reduction technology in use.








     As a result of this evaluation minimum lime and alum coagulation




     were determined to be the top two technologies presently representing




     BATEA.  Minimum lime treatment of the first stage caustic extraction




     was recommended as the BATEA color reduction technology because it




     has a more technically advanced recovery system than the alum coagu-




     lation process.  However, it was also recommended that many of the




     reduction technologies be closely monitored by the EPA.  Some of
                                   1-9

-------
these systems appeared to be applicable if technological develop-




ment could achieve the necessary refinement in the systems.









Section VII presented the cost analysis for the minimum lime




system.  The costs were capital and total annual cost.  The total




annual cost was the sum of the annual cost (depreciation and




interest), operator and maintenance labor, energy and chemical




costs.









A minimum lime treatment system to reduce the color of the first




caustic stage extraction effluent was sized and estimated for a 670




TPD model mill.  The minimum lime treatment system for which cost




estimates were made represents an entirely independent system from




the existing mill processes and external treatment.  Costs for




other model mills were developed from the cost calculated for the




670 TPD facility.








A total annual cost range with the model mills of $2.50 to $3.50




per ton of production resulted from the cost calculations.  The




lower cost was for those model mills producing the greatest amount




of product (1300 TPD), while the higher cost was for the mills with




the lowest level of production (250 TPD).  The cost for the 670 TPD




model mill was calculated to be $2.85 per ton of production.
                             1-10

-------
2.   BATEA Effluent Color Discharge - Average Day









The calculation of the average day BATEA color discharge load was




based upon a color control process concluded to be technologically




feasible at the present time.  Optimizing color reduction would




require treatment of all the color contributing wastewater streams




from a bleached kraft mill.  However, as determined in Section V,




development of a color reduction technology to achieve this opti-




mized condition has not reached the stage of actual application as




a feasible process.  The basis for calculating the BATEA effluent




color discharge for the average day was the minimum lime color




reduction of the first stage caustic extraction effluent.  The




first stage caustic extraction effluent was determined to be the




major source of color at the majority of the 26 pulp and paper




mills surveyed.  In addition to the minimum lime treatment of the.




first stage caustic extraction effluent the reduction in total




effluent color caused by reducing or eliminating the wastewater




discharge from the pulp mill decker/screen room was evaluated.




Reducing or eliminating the amount of wastewater from this phase of




the pulping operation is a BATEA internal color and as such must be




evaluated to determine the total color with this process discharge




reduced or eliminated in volume.








Two points were calculated to determine a range of values for




reductions in the color load from the decker/screen room of 50 and
                              1-11

-------
100 percent.  The specific color load contributed by this process




was calculated at 24 percent of the total color load at the se-




condary treatment system influent.  As described earlier this




percentage represents the average color load contributed from the




decker/screen room during the color surveys.









Because the scope of the study did not specify the evaluation of




daily color load variability over a long term (13 months or more),




there were no variability factors between annual average day and




maximum 30 day average and maximum day calculated.  Therefore,




without these variability factors or an annual average day color




load the normal color limitations of maximum 30 day average and




maximum day could not be calculated.  It was determined that the




average day color loads for the survey periods at the mills would




be used instead.  It was, however, recommended that the EPA obtain,




or monitor and determine, the daily color load at a few of the




average bleached kraft mills surveyed in this study over at least a




13 month period.  With this data the average day color load de-




termined in this study can be verified or revised, and the maximum




30 day average and maximum day variability factors can be determined




and the revised limitations calculated.








It was also recommended that the color load determinations for




bleach kraft mills be based on the bleach plant production rather




than the final production, which is presently used.  Using the
                              1-12

-------
bleach plant production would eliminate the inaccuracies caused at




mills which utilize large amounts of fillers for their paper




production, purchased pulp, and/or other types of pulp in the




manufacture of their finished product.  The bleach plant has been




determined to be the process responsible for over half of the total




color load at a bleach kraft mill and as such the bleach plant




production should be used to calculate color loads.  The BATEA




effluent color discharge for the average day calculated in this




report were done using the bleach kraft production.








It was also recommended that color limitations should be for a




single bleached kraft subcategory (includes market kraft, fine




kraft, and BCT kraft), a dissolving kraft subcategory and a soda




subcategory.  Additionally, it was determined that the wood specie




allowance would depend upon the percentage of softwood pulp bleached




by a specific facility.









The mills used to calculate the BATEA effluent color discharge




(average day) were those mills surveyed which had raw waste BOD




values at, or below the BATEA raw waste BOD load.  The rationale




supporting this procedure was that mills which met the BATEA BOD




raw waste load had eliminated that portion of their color load to




the wastewater treatment system that results from insufficient




internal controls.  Therefore, the color load from these mills (as




defined by the raw waste BOD) would approximate the color loads  .
                              1-13

-------
      from the  entire  industry with tighter  internal  controls  adopted on

      an  industry-wide basis.  The  recommended  BATEA  effluent  color

      discharge (average  day) for the bleached  kraft  dissolving kraft and

      soda subcategories  are as  follows:
                                   100  Percent          100  Percent
                                   Softwood Pulp        Hardwood  Pulp
                                 Kg/Kkg (Ibs/Ton)     Kg/Kkg (Ibs/Ton)
Bleach Kraft

@50% Color Reduction From
  The Decker/Screen Room

@100% Color Reduction  From
  The Decker/Screen Room
 89.5    (179)
 60.5    (121)
            45
            30
        (89.5)
        (60.5)
Dissolving Kraft
i
@50% Color Reduction From
  The Decker/Screen Room

@100% Color Reduction  From
  The Decker/Screen Room
114.5    (229)
 67
(134)
            57     (114.5)
33.5    (67)
Soda

@50%  Color Reduction  From         130       (259)
  The Decker/Screen Room

(§100% Color Reduction From         96       (192)
  The Decker/Screen Room
                     65     (129.5)
                     48
                    (96)
     Mills pulping a percentage of  softwood pulp less  than 100 percent

     would have a BATEA effluent  color discharge (average day) calculated
                                   1-14

-------
on the basis of the actual percentage.  The discharge load would be




somewhere between the 100 percent softwood and 100 percent hardwood




values listed.
                              1-15

-------
                              SECTION II




                             INTRODUCTION









A.   PROJECT OBJECTIVES




                               i




A color sampling and analysis program was performed at 25 bleached kraft




mills and one soda mill to improve the information and data base for




substantiating or modifying the BATEA effluent color limitations listed




in the "Development Document for Advanced Notice of Proposed or Promul-




gated Rule Making for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source




Performance Standards for the Bleached Kraft, Groundwood, Sulfite, Soda,




Deink, and Non-Integrated Paper Mills Segment of the Pulp, Paper, and




Paperboard Mills Point Source Category" dated August 1975.









In addition to the data collected from the 26 mill surveys, a review of




the literature pertaining to color and color reduction technologies




along with a summary of data available from manufacturers of treatment




systems for color reduction were undertaken.  A color reduction tech-




nology which presently represents BATEA was identified and costs for




model mills to utilize this color reduction technology to meet BATEA




effluent color limitations were calculated.









B.   METHODS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION









Process and wastewater color measurement surveys were arranged at 25




bleached kraft mills and one soda mill.   Attempts were made to schedule
                                   II-l

-------
these surveys during periods of normal mill operation. This was done so




that sampling and subsequent color determinations would be representative




of typical mill operations.  Every attempt was made to obtain data which




accurately reflected average color levels in mill effluents and internal




process streams.









The actual sampling and testing program was preceded by a one-day meet-




ing between mill personnel and a project engineer.  In this preliminary




meeting specifics of the color survey and how this program relates to




the effluent limitations work in general were discussed.  The "EPA Ef-




fluent Guidelines Color Survey Form" was reviewed and completed at this




meeting (see Appendix II).  The project engineer was also responsible




for establishing the sampling program within the mill prior to sampling




and testing.  Specific sample points, means of sample collection,




laboratory arrangments and other details were covered during the pre-




liminary visit.








Information was also obtained pertaining to the brownstock washing,




bleaching, and any other processes which might have a significant effect




on color levels.  Bleaching sequence, recycle schemes and modifications




to or deviations from conventional pulp production techniques were




recorded at this time.








The color survey team usually consisted of two persons, but in a few




mills, circumstances warranted the use of three people.  Sampling was




conducted for a period of 72 consecutive hours during which three 24-




hour composite samples were obtained at each sampling point.  Sampling
                                    II-2

-------
points were selected to identify the main sources of color generation

within the mill.  Additional sampling locations were included before and

throughout the waste treatment system for the purpose of observing how

various waste treatment systems affect color levels.  In many instances,

automatic composite sampling equipment existing at normal mill sample

points was used to obtain the composite samples.  In the absence of

these devices, samples were manually collected and composited.  The

samples were refrigerated during the 24-hour collection period prior to

conducting the color determination.



It was the specific intent of this study to measure the true color form

present in the composite samples rather than the apparent color.  Two

techniques of color determination were employed in this study:  the

NCASI procedure and the EPA procedure.  Both of these techniques are

discussed below.  The survey team conducted color analysis at the end of

each 24-hour sampling period using equipment supplied by the contractor.

Mill personnel made laboratory space available for conducting the tests

and also supplied additional equipment and chemical solutions as needed.



The NCASI procedure involved first measuring and recording the pH of the

composite sample.  The pH was then adjusted to 7.6 using sulfuric acid

        or sodium hydroxide (NaOH).  In some cases hydrochloric acid

          used in place of sulfuric acid.  Comparison tests were per-
formed which indicated no significant differences in color levels resul-
ting from pH adjustment by! HC;L instead of 112804.  Sample volume increase
                          V
resulting from pH adjustment was limited to one percent.   The pH adjusted
                                  II-3

-------
sample was next filtered through a 0.8 micron filter which had been




prerinsed with distilled water.  The filtered sample was transferred to




a 10 nm path length test tube and brought to room temperature.  The




Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 70 spectrophotometer was set at 465 nm and




referenced to 100 percent transmittance with a distilled water blank.




The sample was then inserted into the spectrophotometer and the percent




transmittance was recorded at 465 nm.  Since the spectrophotometer




calibration curve is more accurate above 25 percent transmittance, some




samples were diluted with distilled water so that the percent trans-




mittance would be approximately 25 percent or greater at 465 nm.  Dilu-




tion factors were recorded on the data sheet along with percent trans-




mittance (see the Appendix for a copy of the data recording sheets).  A




more detailed description of the NCASI procedure can be found in NCASI




Bulletin 253.









The EPA Procedure was based on the spectrophotometric color method




presented in Part 206A of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water




and Wastewater, 13th edition.  The samples were first adjusted to a pH




of 7.6 using H^SO, or NaOH.  A 0.8 micron filter was precoated with a




slurry of diatomaceous earth and distilled water.  A small amount of




diatomaceous earth was also added to the pH adjusted sample and the




mixture was then filtered through the precoated filter. The filtered




sample was next transferred to a spectrophotometer test tube and brought




to room temperature.  Percent transmittance was measured and recorded at




30 different wave lengths using the spectrophotometer. (See the Appendix




for the specific wave lengths used).  Each wave length was referenced to




100 percent transmittance with a distilled water blank.
                                  II-4

-------
In addition to collecting color data, production and process wastewater




flow data were collected for the sampling period.  More specifically,




these items included:









     1.   Schematic flow diagram of waste treatment system and mill




          processes.









     2.   Mill production during the 72-hour color survey.









     3.   Mill production and wastewater data for the year July 1, 1974




          to June 30, 1975.









     4.   Flow measurements or estimates at each point of sample col-




          lection during the 72-hour color survey.









     5.   Data on waste stream parameters measured on mill effluent




          during the 72-hour survey.









From time to time additional information was requested from mill per-




sonnel when said information appeared to be relevant to the purposes of




this study.









C.   METHODS USED FOR PROCESSING DATA









A computer program was devised to assist in calculation of the three




trichromatic coefficients (EPA procedure) and color units (NCASI pro-
                                   II-5

-------
cedure) present for each day's sample points.  Output was by sample and




listed mill number, mill name, mill location, sample name, and unadjusted




and adjusted pH values.









The computer printout sheets for the "EPA Color Procedure" listed measured




wave lengths in nanometers (nm) and corresponding percent transmittance




for each ordinate X, Y, and Z.  Tristimulus values were calculated by




summing each ordinate and multiplying the total by the appropriate




factor. Tristimulus values X, Y, and Z were listed below their ordinate




columns, where Z was the percent luminance.  Trichromatic coefficients x




and y were calculated from the tristimulus values.  The location of (x




and y) on a chromaticity diagram gave dominant wavelength and excitation




purity.  Hue was obtained by comparison of dominant wavelength with a




table of hue vs wave length range.








A portion of the computer printout sheets for the "NCASI Color Proce-




dure" listed the results of that computation.  Percent transmittance at




465 nm is directly related to the amount of color present and, with the




proper calibration curve established from color standards for each




instrument, a measure of the color units present was obtained.








The resulting color units were then used to calculate color loads for




each day of the color survey at all the sample points.








Each mill's color survey data was assembled upon completion of the color




survey.  This data consisted of the following:
                                   II-6

-------
     1.   EPA Effluent Guidelines Color Survey Form (see Appendix II);









     2.   Process diagrams of both the mill and its treatment system;









     3.   Production Data Summary Sheet (see Appendix III);









     4.   Color Data Summary Sheet (included NCASI color survey pro-




          cedure results with the color load in pounds per day and




          pounds per ton calculated,  and the EPA color survey procedure




          summarized for each sample point, see Appendix IV);









     5.   Split Sample Results Form (see Appendix V);  and









     6.   Computer sheet of color determinations.









The color survey data were submitted to the mill for review and comments




prior to evaluation.









Additional general operating parameters for the pulping and bleaching




processes were requested from each mill for the purpose of aiding in the




data evaluation.  The form listing the 11 items of additional data re-




quested is shown in the Appendix.
                                   II-7

-------
                            SECTION III




                     DATA SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS









This section presents a summary of the historical mill data collected




during the color surveys as well as the color results from the sampling




and analysis done at the 26 mills.









Initially, a comparison of the average bleach plant and final production




along with the wood species (softwood and/or hardwood) bleached for a




specific one-year period prior to the color surveys and the same average




parameters for the three-day color survey period was performed.  The




purpose of the comparison was to determine if the 26 mills were opera-




ting at or near normal capacity, and bleaching their normal mix of




softwood and hardwood.









The next phase of the analysis was to check the validity of the potas-




sium chloroplatinate/cobaltous chloride solutions as an acceptable




standard for the measurement of color in pulp and paper mill effluents.




The procedure used was to evaluate the range in dominant wavelengths




determined during the color surveys.









Split samples which were undertaken at 15 of the 26 mills were then




analyzed.  This evaluation was done by developing a correlation between




the mill and the Edward C. Jordan Co., Inc.'s results so that an in-
                                  III-l

-------
dication of the level of confidence associated with the derived cor-




relations could be made.









The remainder of the evaluations dealt with the results of the NCASI




color procedure sampling and analysis work done at the 26 pulp and paper




mills.  The results are presented by mill for each sample point on a




daily basis along with the average for each sample point.  This pre-




sentation shows the results in mg/1, thousand kilograms of color per day




(thousand pounds per day), and finally in terms of kilograms of color




per thousand kilograms (pounds per ton) of bleach plant production.  The




reason for calculating the color load based on the bleach plant pro-




duction and not final production are given later in this Section.








Utilizing the color load determinations, an evaluation of the origin of




color within the mill processes was undertaken to determine the major




color contributors at each mill.  Block diagrams showing the color load




and percent of the total color load contributed by the process waste-




water streams sampled is shown along with the approximate sewer loca-




tions and points of discharge to the wastewater treatment system.  The




percent of the total color load at each mill which was identified during




the color surveys is presented and the major sources of color are




identified.








Evaluation by subcategory, wood species, and several pulping and bleaching




parameters (i.e., kappa numbers, brightness, saltcake losses, and




sulfidity), were performed.  These evaluations were done for the purpose
                                  III-2

-------
of trying to establish valid relationships between color load produced




and the internal pulping and bleaching operations which may have caused




the color.









Finally, a summary of the conclusions which resulted from the eval-




uations performed is presented.









A.   HISTORICAL MILL. DATA VERSUS COLOR SURVEY DATA









The initial phase of data analysis attempted to determine whether each




mill was operating at or near normal in terms of both production and




wood species pulped and bleached.  The basis for this determination was




a comparison of the average daily production figures reported by each




mill on the "EPA Color Survey Form," or the data year production figures




submitted, with the average daily production levels encountered during




the three-day color survey.  Table 1 shows the comparison of softwood




versus hardwood, bleach plant production, and finished production




during the two periods of concern.









Sixteen of the 26 mills surveyed were bleaching approximately the same




softwood/hardwood mix during the survey period as was bleached during




the data year reported.  Mill 102 normally bleaches approximately 74




percent softwood pulp, however, it bleached only 39 percent softwood




pulp during the color survey.  As discussed later in this section,




processing softwood pulp generally results in higher color levels in a




mill's wastewater; therefore, it can be theorized that the color level




found at Mill 102 was less than that normally experienced.  Six other







                                  III-3

-------
                                                           TABLE 1

                             COMPARISON OF MILL PRODUCTION FOR DATA  YEAR WITH  COLOR SURVEY PERIOD
                                   Wood  Specie Pulped  (%)
Average Daily Bleach Plant
   Production Thousand
 Kilograms/Day (Tons/Day)
     Average Daily Production
Thousand Kilograms/Day (Tons/Day)
Mill
Mill No. Subcategory Specie
100 Coarse & Market Pulp Softwood
Hardwood



101 Fine & Market Pulp Softwood
Hardwood

102 Miltiple Pulping Softwood
Mixed Products Hardwood
103 Fine 6, Market Pulp Softwood
Hardwood

105 Coarse Board & Tissue Softwood
Hardwood



106 Fine & Market Pulp Softwood
Hardwood

107 Fine & Market Pulp Softwood



Data
Year
55%
45%



56%
44%

74%
26%
54%
46%

57%
43%



83%
17%

100%



Color
Survey
54%
46%



40%1
56%

39%
61%
31%
69%

53%
47%



60%
40%

100%



Data Color
Year Survey Product
894.4 (985) 690.1 (760) Tissue & Toweling
Food Board
Cup Stock
Pulp Dryer
TOTAL
521.2 (574) 614.7 (677) Coated & Uncoated Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
522.1 (575) 561.1 (618) Bleached Board

472.2 (520) 434.0 (478) Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
821.7 (905) 796.3 (877) Paper
Foodboard
Tissue
Market Pulp
TOTAL
484.0 (533) 396.8 (437) Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
131.7 (145) 146.2 (161) Coated Paper
Uncoated Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
Data
Year
363.2
349.6
136.2
45.4
894.4
257.9
252.4
510.3
413.3

227.0
236.1
463.1
390.4
345.0
231.5
54.5
1021.5
238.8
280.6
519.4
173.4
20.0
45.4
238.8
(400)
(385)
(150)
(50)
(985)
(284)
(278)
(562)
(475)

(250)
(260)
(510)
(430)
(380)
(255)
(60)
(1125)
(263)
(309)
(572)
(191)
(22)
(50)
(263)
Color
Survey
296.0
448.6

82.6
827.2
408.6
136.2
544.8
466.7

210.7
263.3
474.0
386.0
347.8
221.6
76.3
1030.6
327.8
69.9
397.7
266.0


266.0
(326)
(494)

(91)
(911)
(450)
(150)
(600)
(514)

(232)
(290)
(522)
(424)
(393)
(244)
(84)
(1135)
(361)
(77)
(438)
(293)


(293)
4% of bleached pulp was reported as transition  pulp  during  the  color  survey  period.

-------
TABLE 1
(Continued)
Average Daily Bleach Plant
Production Thousand Average Daily Production
Wood Specie Pulped (%) Kilograms/Day (Tons/Day) Thousand Kilograms/Day (Tons/Day)

Mill No.
108


110


111




113


114

117


118


Mill
Subcategory Specie
Dissolving Softwood
Hardwood

Fine 4 Market Pulp Softwood
Hardwood

Coarse Board & Tissue Softwood
Hardwood



Coarse & Market Pulp Softwood
Hardwood


Market Pulp Softwood
Hardwood
Coarse & Market Pulp Softwood


Fine Paper Softwood
Hardwood

Data
Year
83%
17%

32%
68%

53%
47%



50%
50%




100%


27%
73%

Color
Survey
72%
28%

30%
70%

63%
37%



51%
49%


25%
75%
100%


25%
75%

Data Color
Year Survey Product
992.4 (1093) 112.3 (1225) Bleached Market Kraft
Dissolving Kraft
TOTAL
590.2 (650) 622.9 (686) Coated Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
601.1 (662) 483.1 (532) Bleached Paper
Unbleached Paper
Bleach Kraft Board
Bleached Coated Paper
TOTAL
1089.6 (1200) 926.2 (1020) Coated Board
Uncoated Board
Market Pulp
TOTAL
668.3 (736) 699.2 (770) Market Pulp

317.8 (350) 306.9 (338) Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
168.0 (185) 149.8 (165) Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
Data
Year
301
691
992
658
340
998
79
1
454
148
682
658
113
317
1089
668

213
104
317
158
18
177
.5
.0
.4
.3
.5
.8
.0
.8
.0
.0
.8
.3
.5
.8
.6
.3

.4
.4
.8
.9
.2
.1
(332)
(761)
(1093)
(725)
(375)
(1100)
(87)
(2)
(500)
(163)
(752)
(725)
(125)
(350)
(1200)
(736)

(235)
(115)
(350)
(175)
(20)
(195)
Color
Survey
799
312
1112
634
292
927
90

458
150
700
759
379
1138
699

194
83
277
178

178
.9
.4
.3
.7
.4
.1
.8

.5
.7
.1
.1
.5
.6
.2

.3
.5
.8
.9

.9
(881)
(344)
(1225)
(699)
(322)
(1021)
(100)

(505)
(166)
(771)
(836)
(418)
(1254)
(770)

(214)
(92)
(306)
(197)

(197)

-------
Wood Specie Pulped (%)
Mill No
119
121
122
125
126
127
134
136
Mill
Subcategory Specie
Fine Paper Softwood
Hardwood
Coarse Board & Tissue Softwood
Hardwood
Coarse & Market Pulp Softwood
Mixed Products Hardwood
Miltlple Pulping & Softwood
Mixed Products Hardwood
Market Pulp Softwood
Dissolving Softwood
Fine Paper Softwood
Hardwood
Fine Paper Softwood
Hardwood
Data
Year
40%
60%
76%
24%
69%
31%
94%
6%
100%
100%
30%
70%
63%
37%
Color
Survey
42%
58%
56%
44%
81%
19%
92%
8%
100%
100%
35%
65%
60%
40%
TABLE 1
(Continued)
Average Daily Bleach Plant
Production Thousand Average Daily Production
Kilograms/Day (Tons/Day) Thousand Kilograms/Day (Tons/Day)
Data Color
Year Survey Product
435.8 (480) 480.3 (529) Book Paper
Fine Paper
TOTAL
1042.4 (1148) 1110.5 (1223) Paperboard
Nodular Pulp
Market Pulp
TOTAL
Uncoated Board
952.5 (1049) 887.1 (977) Newsprint
Coated & Uncoated
Market Pulp
Data
Year
338
182
521
928
38
216
1182
	 »-512
518
259
574
TOTAL 1352
490.3 (540) 457.6 (504) Market Pulp 490
Production was Normal Production was Normal
635.6 (700) 599.3 (660) Coated Paper 871
Uncoated Paper 36
TOTAL
1162.2 (1280) 1263.0 (1391) Uncoated Paper
Uncoated Board
Coated Board
Market Pulp
TOTAL
908
691
572
25
58
1347
.7
.5
.2
.0
.1
.1
.2
.1
.5
.7
.8
.9
.3
.7
.3
.0
.0
.9
.4
.1
.5
(373)
(201)
(574)
(1022)
(42)
(238)
(1302)
(564)
(571)
(286)
(633)
(1490)
(540)
(960)
(40)
(1000)
(761)
(631)
(28)
(64)
(1484)
, Color
Survey
353.2 (389)
189.8 (209)
543
692
45
378
1116
548
770
614
1384
456
808
808
800
543
173
1518
.0
.8
.4
.6
.8
.4
.0
.7
.7
.7
.1
.1
.9
.0
.3
.2
(598)
(763)
(50)
(417)
(1230)
(604)
(848)
(677)
(1525)
(503)
(890)
(890)
(882)
(598)
(192)
(1672)

-------
TABLE 1
(Continued)
Wood Specie Pulped (%)
Mill
Mill No. Subcategory
140 Market Pulp
152 Soda
161 Coarse Board 6 Tissue
Specie
Hardwood
Softwood
Hardwood
Softwood
Hardwood
Data
Year
100%
4-5%
95-96%
52%
48%
Color
Survey
100%
4-5%
95-96%
45%
55%
Average Daily
Production
Kilograms /Day
Data
Year
285.1 (314)
219.7 (242)2
645.6 (711)
Bleach Plant
Thousand Average Daily Production
(Tons/Day) Thousand Kilograms/Day (Tons/Day)
Color
Survey Product
316.9 (349) Market Pulp
263.3 (290)2 Paper
816.3 (899) Paper
Market Pulp
TOTAL
Data
Year
285.1 (314)
555.7 (612)
637.4 (702)
127.1 (140)
764.5 (842)
Color
Survey
316.9 (349)
597.5 (658)
799.0 (880)
112.6 (124)
911.6 (1004)
 187
         Market Pulp
                                  Hardwood   100%
                                                      100%
635.6  (700)   706.4  (778)   Market Pulp
                                                                                                                       635.6  (700)   665.6  (733)
Bleached Soda Pulp

-------
mills also bleached less softwood than normal. Mills 101, 103, 106, 108,




121, and 161 bleached 16, 23, 23, 11, 20, and 7 percent less softwood




pulp than average, respectively.









Two mills bleached a higher proportion of softwood pulp than their daily




average for the data year. Mills 111 and 122 had an increase in percent




softwood pulp bleached of 10 and 12 percent, respectively.









The second data comparison was the bleach plant production.  Analysis of




the bleach plant production during the survey period showed 20 of the 26




mills bleached within plus or minus 15 percent of their average daily




pulp production levels for the data year.  Of the remaining six mills,




three bleached 23, 18, and 20 percent less than average (Mills 100, 106,




and 111, respectively), and three bleached 25, 20, and 26 percent more




pulp than their reported average daily production (Mills 122, 152, and




161, respectively).









Comparison of the average daily production levels showed 24 of the 26




mills produced finished products during the color survey within 15 per-




cent of their data year's average daily levels.  Mills 161 and 106 pro-




duced 19 percent more and 23 percent less, respectively.









The preceding comparisons indicate that the color surveys at the 26




mills were generally conducted during normally anticipated mill oper-




ational levels.  The relative importance of each of the three criteria,
                                  III-8

-------
wood specie, bleach plant production, and final production, to the color




load from bleached kraft mills is discussed later in this Section.









B.   DOMINANT WAVELENGTH









The utilization of standard solutions of potassium chloroplatinate/




cobaltous chloride as the basis for establishing the color of mill




wastewaters was of concern because of possible differences in dominant




wavelengths.  The dominant wavelength of a solution is indicative of the




color perceived by the human eye and encompasses the range of 400 to 700




nm.









The method employed to establish dominant wavelengths was the ten or-




dinate spectrophotometric procedures presented in the 13th Edition of




Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.  Analysis




of the color standards yielded a dominant wavelength in the range of




575-576 nm, which is equivalent to a yellow hue.  Secondary treatment




influent and final effluent samples from the 26 mills surveyed were




analyzed to establish their dominant wavelengths.  Secondary treatment




influent sample dominant wavelengths ranged from 572 to 580 nm and




averaged 576.5 nm.  Final effluent sample dominant wavelengths ranged




from 571 to 580 nm and averaged 576.8 nm.  The survey data is presented




in Table 2 and graphically depicted on the frequency of occurrence




functions presented in Figures 1 and 2.









The range in dominant wavelengths encountered during the surveys are




consistent with that measured for the standards employed, and thus
                                  III-9

-------
                                                       TABLE 2

                                                DOMINANT WAVELENGTHS
              Dominant Wavelength        Dominant Wavelength        Dominant Wavelength         Dominant Wavelength
        Mill  Secondary  Final     Mill  Secondary  Final     Mill  Secondary  Final     Mill   Secondary  Final
        No.   Influent   Effluent  No.   Influent   Effluent  No.   Influent   Effluent  No.    Influent   Effluent
100


575
574
577
575
577
577
108


577
578
577
576-577 119
577-578
577-577
575
576
575
571 136
575
574
577
577
577
576
576
576
        101      	        576    110      578        578    121      576         577     140       577        577
                            576             578        577             576         577              577        577
                            577             578        577             575         575              576        577
M
M
V       102      	        577    111      576        576    122      579         577     152       576        576
o                	        576             576        577             578         579              576        576
                            577             577        578             580         577              574        576

        103      576        577    113      576        578    125      579         578     161
                 579        580             577        579             579         578
                 578        578             579        579             579         577

        105      579        580    114      576        579    126      580         580     187       578        579
                 577        579             576        578             580         580              578        579
                 578        	             577        579             579         580              578        579

        106      573        579    117      	        578    127      578         579
                 577        579             	        576             578         577
                 577        579             	        576             578         578

        107      	        579    118      574        578    134      575         575
                            579             572        572             576         575
                                            575        576             575         575

-------
                                        FIGURE   I

                DOMINANT WAVELENGTH  PROBABILITY  CURVE

                               SECONDARY  INFLUENT
  980
  579
  578
                         SECONDARY  INFLUENT
E
c
 „
I
h-
O
z
UJ
O
O
577
  576
  575
  574
  573
  572
                                                                                          J_
99.99     99.9 99 8     99  98    95   90    80   7O  6O 5O 4O  30   20

                                        PERCENT  GREATER
                                                                  10
                                                                            I   O.5  O.2 O.I O.O5
O.OI

-------
                         FIGURE: 2
        DOMINANT WAVELENGTH PROBABILITY CURVE
                      FINAL EFFLUENT
580r
               FINAL EFFLUENT
                           70 60 50 40  30

                           PERCENT .GREATER
0.05 0.01

-------
 further leads  to  the  acceptance  of  potassium  chloroplatinate/cobaltous




 chloride  solutions  as an  acceptable standard  for  the measurement  of




 color  in  mill  wastewater.









 C.   SPLIT SAMPLE ANALYSIS









 1.   Introduction









 Color measurement analytical techniques employed  at the mills surveyed




 were reviewed  and analyzed.  For those mills which split samples  for




 independent color determinations, correlations between mill and con-




 tractor results were  to be established including  an indication of the




 level of  confidence associated with  the derived correlations.









 The analytical determination of color is based on the measurement of




 light transmittance through a sample and comparison of the results




 obtained with  light transmittance through color standards of various




 concentrations measured under similar conditions.  Color concentration




 ideally follows Beer's law which states that the logarithm of the trans-




mittance of a monochromatic light beam through a sample is directly




 proportional to the concentration of the absorbing substance in the




 sample and to  the path length of the light through the sample.  Solu-




 tions of potassium chloroplatinate,  hued with cobaltous chloride, are




used as color  standards and the monochromatic light wavelength employed




 in the color determination is 465 nm.  This wavelength is employed




because the spectral transmittance curves of standard color solutions
                                 111-13

-------
and kraft mill wastewater samples parallel each other in this region of




the visible spectrum.  Under normal laboratory conditions, standard




solutions up to approximately 2,500 mg/1 (color units) can be prepared.




Above this concentration the standard solution becomes supersaturated




and thus cannot be used.  Theoretically, color concentrations up to




approximately 8,000 mg/1 can be measured with spectrophotometric equip-




ment.  However, usual practice assumes Beer's Law does not hold true at




transmittances less than 20-25 percent (color concentrations greater




than approximately 2,500 mg/1) and, as a result, sample dilutions with




deionized water were made to bring the color of the sample within the




range of the standards (1).  The color of the diluted sample is deter-




mined and multiplication by the appropriate dilution factor results in




the actual sample color concentration (2).









Many factors affect both the accuracy and precision with which the true




color of a sample may be analytically determined.  Two primary influencing




factors include the pH of the sample and the presence of turbidity in




the sample.  Color varies with pH and, in general, increases with in-




creasing pH.  The pH of samples must therefore be adjusted to a discrete




value prior to analysis and the value that has been selected is a pH=7.6.




Dilution of a sample with acid or base,  as required for pH adjustment,




must not induce a volumetric change greater than one percent.  The




method of turbidity removal employed also has a significant effect on




the resultant color value.  Two principal techniques are used for tur-




bidity removal:  centrifugation or filtration.  Centrifugation has been




found to be capable of removing turbidity but not true color.  In general,
                                  111-14

-------
however, this technique is not employed because turbidity removal varies




with the size and speed of the centrifuge employed.  In addition, par-




ticles less dense than the suspending medium tend to float or remain in




solution during centrifugation thus yielding incomplete removal and




subsequent erroneous results.  Filtration of samples through 0.45 micron




filter paper was found by NCASI to be unacceptable because the fil-




trate's color was dependent on the volume of sample subjected to fil-




tration.  Use of 0.8 micron filter paper, on the other hand, was found




to alleviate the above and still yield a turbidity-free filtrate.  The




success of turbidity removal by filtration is still, however, greatly




dependent upon the analyst's technique.  During the filtration of a




sample, a rapid reduction in the rate of sample throughput indicates




that filter plugging is occurring.  If the above is noted, filtration




should be stopped immediately since further filtration may result in the




removal of the true color bodies and thus the overall color of the




filtrate.









Other factors affecting the precision and accuracy of color determin-




ations are oriented mainly toward the analytical instrument employed.




Certain of these factors include:









     1.   use of instrument allowing wide incident bandwidths;




     2.   voltage fluctuations;




     3.   stray radiation;




     4.   varied scattering and reflection losses of the incident light




          beam;




     5.   changes in light path length;
                                   111-15

-------
     6.   variation in optical properties of absorption cells;




     7.   cleanliness of absorption cells; and




     8.   loss of wavelength calibration through improper or incon-




          sistent operation of the analytical instrument.









To provide a basis for comparison of results sample pretreatment and




analysis procedures developed by the NCASI were used.  These are pre-




sented in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 253 ("An Investigation of Improved




Procedures for Measurement of Mill Effluent and Receiving Water Color,"




dated December 1971).  A Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 70, with an 8 nm




spectral bandwidth, was the spectrophotometer used for the measurement




of light transmittance through both the color standards and the mill




wastewater samples in question.








2.   Presentation of Results








The process and wastewater streams subjected to color analysis in this




survey included such items as decker filtrate, first stage chlorination




effluent, first stage caustic extract effluent, primary clarifier in-




fluent/effluent, acid sewer, secondary influent, and final effluent.




The color concentration in these various streams ranged from approx-




imately 50 mg/1 to in excess of 18,000 mg/1.








All samples at each mill were collected in sufficient volume so that




color determinations could be made by the Edward C. Jordan Co., Inc. and




the mill's personnel.  Seven of the 15 mills that analyzed samples used
                                   111-16

-------
the NCASI method of color determination or some modification thereof.


The remaining 8 mills that analyzed samples used various alternate color


determination procedures including Standard Methods, color meters, and


visual comparisons.  Sample pH was not adjusted to 7.6 at 4 of the 8


mills using the alternative procedures.  Table 3 lists the mills that


conducted color analyses and the procedures used.





A computer program was used to calculate a 99.99% confidence least


squares regression function which compared mill and Edward C. Jordan


Co., Inc. analytical results.  The program output listed for each mill


surveyed the slope and intercept of the regression line and the data

                          2
correlation coefficient, R .  Perfect agreement is shown by a line

                                                 2
through the origin with a slope of 1.000 and an R =1.000.  A summary of


the computer analysis is presented in Table 4.





Data correlations for each mill are presented in Figures 3 through 17.


The dashed line labeled "All Samples" on each figure represents the re-


gression line derived by incorporating the data points from all 15


mills.  The solid line labeled "Mill N" represents the regression line


derived from the data specific to "Mill N" only.  For purposes of


clarity, all data points are not always shown.





As can be seen from Table 4, the "All Samples Regression Line" reflects


variations from perfect data agreement resulting from the incorporation


of data derived from "non-standard" analysis procedures.  For this


reason, certain data were deleted and new regression lines calculated.
                                   111-17

-------
                              TABLE 3

                  MILL COLOR ANALYSIS PROCEDURES


Mill No.                     Procedure

 102           Sample centrifuged and pH adjusted to 7.0, color measured
               with a Hach Meter

 103           Hach test kit, no pH adjustment

 107           No pH adjustment, sample centrifuged and color estab-
               lished by comparison with color standards in Nessler
               tubes

 108           Standard Methods

 110           Modification of NCASI, using Reeve Angle 934 AH Filter

 114           NCASI, Spectronic 20 used for determining color

 117           Oregon DEQ procedure

 119           NCASI, 2 Whatman No. 5 filter papers used for filtering,
               and readings were done at 455 nm.

 121           pH not adjusted, color measured with a Beckman DB
               Spectrophotometer at 465 nm and compared to potassium
               chloroplatinate standard

 125           NCASI, Beckman Model B Spectrophotometer used to deter-
               mine color

 127           NCASI

 134           NCASI

 136           NCASI

 140           Standard Methods, pH adjusted to 7.6, Hach dr/2 Spectro-
               photometer is used to do readings

 152           Standard Methods, true color
                           111-18

-------
                      TABLE 4




SUMMARY COMPUTER PROGRAM RESULTS FOR SPLIT SAMPLES
Mill No.
102
103
107
108
110
114
117
119
121
125
127
134
136
140
152
All Samples Re-
gression Line
Arithmetic Mean
7 NCASI Mills
Arithmetic Mean
8 Non-NCASI Mills
Ideal Regression
Line
Slope
0.993
0.716
1.02
0.986
0.790
1.17
0.394
0.991
0.873
1.01
1.02
0.481
0.909
1.08
0.810
0.896
0.910
0.859
1.00
Intercept
308
1,610
-86
125
97
-146
420
6
96
196
219
377
719
1
62
293
210
317
0
R
0.832
0.303
0.981
0.988
0.998
0.986
0.426
0.977
0.988
0.994
0.862
0.977
0.883
0.335
0.906
0.884
0.954
0.720
1.00
                   111-19

-------
                             FIGURE   3

  SPLIT SAMPLE REGRESSION  LINES, MILL  IO2
  ISOOi—
en

E



_l 1000
CO

2
o
o:
u
h-
LJ
Q

cr 500
o
_i
o
o
             MILL 102

             Y = 0.993X + 308

             R2 = 0.832
                ALL SAMPLES

                Y=0.896X + 293

                R2 = 0.884
          I	I
I    I    I    I   II
I
till
                         500                  1000



                 COLOR DETERMINATION BY CONTRACTOR mg/l
                                                1500

-------
                                FIGURE   4
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL  IO3
  7500
E 5QQ.Q
m

2
O
tt:
UJ 250Q
h-
LU
Q

ft
O
_J
O
O
MILL 103
,Y= 0.7I6X + 1610

R2= 0.303
                               SAMPLES

                          Y= 0.896X  293

                          R2= 0.884
                                                  I
                                                               i	I
                           25QO                   50QO

                    COLOR DETERMINATION  BY CONTRACTOR mg/l
                                                    7500

-------
                               FIGURE   5

  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION LINES,   MILL IO7
  7500 I—
  5000
m

2
O
o:
HJ
I-
UJ
Q

CK
O
_l
O
o
  2500
                                MILL  107

                                Y= I.O2X-86

                                R*= 0.981       //
                                                 ALL SAMPLES

                                                 Y= 0.896X-I-293

                                                 R2= 0.884
                          2500                   5000


                   COLOR DETERMINATION  BY CONTRACTOR  mg/l
                                                                     7500

-------
                              FIGURE  S

  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL IO8
  1500 i—
  1000 —
CD
h-
<
5
o:
UJ
I-
UJ
o

tr
a
_i
o
o
              Y= O.896X+ 293

              R2=0.884
500 —
                         500                  1000


                   COLOR DETERMINATION BX CONTRACTOR mg/l
                                                                I5OO

-------
                               FIGURE   7
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL  MO
  7500 i—
^5000
>
CD
\-
<
or
  2500
LU
Q

cc
O
_l
O
O
                                        ALL
                                        Y= 0.896X-
                                        R = 0.884
MILL 110
Y = O.790X + 97
R2= 0.998
                          25OO                  5000


                   COLOR DETERMINATION  BY CONTRACTOR  mg/l
                        7500

-------
                               FIGURE   8
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL
  7500r—
en
  5000
I-
<
5
QC
UJ 2500
Ct
O
_l
O
O
                       MILL 114
                       Y= I.I7X-I46
                       R2= 0. 986
ALL SAMPLES
Y= 0.896X^293
R2= 0. 884
                                                    j	i	I
                          2500                  5000

                   COLOR DETERMINATION  BY CONTRACTOR mg/l
                        7500

-------
                               FIGURE   9
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL  117
 15000 i—
jjfioooo
00
o
o:
UJ 5000
h-
UJ
Q
O
O
      0
                                    ALL SAMPLES
                 Y= 0. 896X+293

                 R2= 0.884
                                                      MILL 117

                                                      Y = O.394 + 42O

                                                      R2= O.426
                                                                       I
      500O                  IOOOO


COLOR DETERMINATION  BY CONTRACTOR mg/l
15000

-------
                                FIGURE   10

    BPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL 119
   3000 —
m
   20OO —
a:
u
h-
LJ
Q

o:
o

o
o
   1000 —
                                         MILL  119

                                         Y| 0.99IX-I-6

                                         R = 0.977
                                  j	i
                                                        o.
                    Y= 0.896X+293

                    R= 0.884
                      1000              2000              30OO


                   (COLOR DETERMINATION BY CONTRACTOR mg/l

-------
                              FIGURE  II

  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION LINES,  MILL  121
  7500 r—
  5000
>-
CD
o

<
2

i
o:
  2500
UJ
Q
O
o
                       ALL  SAMPLES

                       Y=0. 896X + 293

                       R2=0.884
                                           MILL 121

                                           Y = 0. 873X + 96

                                           R2= 0.988
                         250O                 5000


                   COLOR DETERMINATION BY CONTRACTOR
                                                                     I
                                                                   7500

-------
                              FIGURE  12

  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION LINES,  MILL  125
 15000 r—
  10000
m

z
o
h-

z

I
o:
  5000
UJ
Q

o:
o
_i
o
o
              I	i
                               MILL 125

                               Y= I.

                               R2= 0.994
                                            ALL SAMPLES

                                             = 0.896X+293
                                            R= 0.884
                          1
                                                I
                         5000                 10000


                   COLOR DETERMINATION BY CONTRACTOR  mg/l
                                                                    I50OO

-------
                              FIGURE  13
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION LINES,  MILL  127
 15000
glOOOO
>-
CO
o:
  5000
u
o

o:
O
_i
O
o
MILL 127

Y= I.02X+
                R =0.862
                       ALL SAMPLES

                       Y= 0.896+293

                       R2= 0.884
                         5000                 IOOOO


                   COLOR  DETERMINATION BY CONTRACTOR mg/l
                                                   15000

-------
                               FIGURE   14
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL  134
 15000 I—
  10000
>-
ffl
or
  5000
UJ
Q

££
O
_l
O
O
                       ALL SAMPLES
                       Y= 0. 896X+293
                       R2= 0.884
MILL 134
Y=0. 48IX+377
R*= 0.977
                          5000                  10000


                   COLOR DETERMINATION  BY CONTRACTOR  mg/l
                I500O

-------
                               FIGURE   15
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL  136
 15000 i—
5" 10000
00

2
o
o:
UJ 5000
H
UJ
Q

<£
O
_l
O
o
                   MILL  136
Y=0.909X +719

R2= 0. 883
ALL SAMPLES

Y = 0.896X4-293

R2= 0.884
                          5000                  10000


                   COLOR DETERMINATION  BY CONTRACTOR  mg/l
                                                  15000

-------
                                FIGURE   16

    SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,  MILL I4O
   3000
o>
E
>-
CD
o

<
cc
UJ
h-
UJ
Q

cr
o
   2000
O  1000
MILL 140

Y= I.08X+I

R2= 0. 335
             ALL SAMPLES

             Y=0.896+293

             R2= 0.884
                          i  i  i  i  i
                                                           i  i  i
                      IOOO             2OOO              3OOO


                 JC.OLOR DETERMINATION  Y CONTRACTOR mg/l

-------
                              FIGURE  17
  SPLIT  SAMPLE  REGRESSION  LINES,   MILL  152
  7500.—
  5000
5
m
z
o

z
i
o:
  2500
UJ
Q
CE
o
_)
o
o
                           ALL SAMPLES
                           Y=0. 896X-I-293
                           R2= 0. 884
                                     MILL 152
                                     Y = 0.8IOX+62
                                     R2= 0. 906
                                            ,	I
                                                             i	i
                          2500                 5000

                   COLOR DETERMINATION BY CONTRACTOR mg/l
                                                                   7500

-------
For example, pH adjustment was previously noted as having an effect on


the color of a sample.  As a result, a new regression analysis was per-


formed using the data from all samples that had been subjected to a pH


adjustment to 7.6.  The outcome is presented below:






     Samples at all pH values


          Y = 0.896X + 293                   with R2 = 0.884


     Samples at pH = 7.6 only


          Y = 0.969X + 52                    with R2 = 0.864


          where Y = color as measured by mill personnel (in mg/1)


                X = color as measured by contractor (in mg/1).






As can be seen from the above, pH adjustment to 7.6 had a significant


impact on the correlation of mill to contractor measurement with the


slope of the line more closely approximating unity and the intercept


approaching zero.  Adjustment of pH, however, had a relatively minor

                                             2
effect on the data correlation coefficient, R , adjusting it from 0.884


to 0.864.






Another variable of concern was the utilization of color data above


2,500 mg/1 resulting from either taking transmittance readings of less


than 25 percent or from applying appropriate multiplication factors to


samples that had been diluted with deionized water prior to measuring


light transmittance.  Linear regression analyses were thus undertaken


encompassing data between zero and 2,500 mg/1 color with the results as


follows:
                            111-35

-------
                                                               2
                                   Slope     Intercept        R
Using NCASI Procedure
     Samples at all color con-
      centrations                  0.910        210         0.954

     Samples with less than
      2,500 mg/1 in color          0.863        148         0.869

Using Non-NCASI Procedure

     Samples at all color con-
      centrations                  0.859        317         0.720

     Samples with less than
      2,500 mg/1 color             0.938        196         0.761
From the above, the only obvious consistent alteration induced by lim-

iting the color concentration used in the analysis is a decrease in the

intercepts of the linear functions.  Depending on the procedure employed

for color measurement by each mill, both the slope of the functions and

the data correlation coefficients were subject to either positive or

negative changes.  The above data are presented in Table 5.



3.    Summary



The accuracy and precision of color measurements are known to be a

function of the analytical techniques and equipment employed.  To es-

tablish correlations between results obtained by mill personnel and the

contractor, various statistical analyses were performed.



Adjusting a sample's pH to 7.6 prior to color measurement was found to

be one of the primary factors inducing variances between mill and con-

tractor color values on the same sample.  If mill personnel adjusted the
                             111-36

-------
                              TABLE 5




    SUMMARY COMPUTER PROGRAM RESULTS FOR SELECTED SPLIT SAMPLES
Mill No.
102
103
107
108
110
114
117
119
121
125
127
134
136
140
152
Sample Regression
Line
7 NCASI Mills
8 Non-NCASI Mills
Ideal Regression
Slope
0.993
0.718
1.05
0.963
0.668
1.01
1.04
. 0.774
0.912
0.793
1.08
0.890
0.823
0.925
0.897
0.969
0.863
0.938
1.00
Intercept
308
888
-99
144
212
30
57
163
88
415
-42
76
181
160
22
52
148
196
0
R
0.832
0.577
0.845
0.851
0.936
0.993
0.925
0.664
0.993
0.750
0.950
0.858
0.931
0.285
0.776
0.864
0.869
0.761
1.00
Remarks
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Color <_ 2,500
Calculated without
mills that did not
adjust pH included



Line
                          111-37

-------
pH of their portion of a sample to the above value, the following cor-

relation prevailed:

          Y    =    0.969 X + 52                   with R2    =    0.864

    where X    =    color as measured by the Edward C. Jordan Co., Inc.
                    (mg/1)

          Y    =    color as measured by mill personnel (mg/1)
           2
          R    =    data correlation coefficient

Twenty-six (26) mills were surveyed during the course of this study.

For comparative purposes, the above correlation has been applied to the

final effluent color concentrations encountered at these 26 mills and is

presented below:



                                        	Color, mg/1	
                                        Minimum      Average      Maximum

Determined by the Edward C. Jordan Co.,
  Inc.                                    310         1,330        2,260

Calculated Mill Value                     350         1,340        2,240

Difference                                +40           +10          -20

Percent Difference                        +13%          +1%          -1%
The resulting 10 mg/1 difference between the mill and the Edward C. Jordan

Co., Inc. color concentration at average conditions indicates the nor-

mally good comparison of results attained at the final effluent during the

color surveys.



In summary, comparable results can be obtained independently as long as

the analytical techniques employed are equivalent.
                                111-38

-------
D.   RESULTS FROM MILL COLOR SURVEYS









The results of the NCASI procedure for determining color are presented




on Table 7.  The color, in mg/1, at each sample location for each day of




the color survey at all the mills, and the average color concentration




at the sample locations are presented.  The use of mg/1 in place of




color units was done in previous EPA color determinations, and to




provide a basis for comparing the results of that earlier work with the




results from this study the procedure was also followed in this report.




To help simplify the data presentation it was necessary to code each




sample location with a letter or footnote number.  Table 6 shows the




identification for each letter code used on Tables 7, 8, and 9.  Foot-




note numbers used to identify sample locations are given at the bottom




of the page upon which they appear.









The NCASI color procedure color results, in mg/1, were then used to




determine the color load in kilograms per day (pounds per day) at each




sample location.  Table 8 shows the results of these calculations.  The




same letter code was utilized for color load presentation at each sample




location (see Table 6).









E.   COLOR LOAD BASED ON BLEACH PLANT PRODUCTION









Environmental Protection Agency limitations, presently proposed for




color, use the mill's finished production for determining the allowable




color load kg/kkg (Ibs/ton) for each subcategory.  During the project




comments were made by mill personnel that this procedure should be




revised from use of the finished product tonnage to the pulp or bleach





                            111-39

-------
                              TABLE 6

                           MILL LOCATION
               CODE FOR REPORTING COLOR SURVEY DATA
Code           Mill Location Sampled

D              Decker Filtrate (Hardwood and Softwood)

DS             Decker Filtrate (Softwood)

DH             Decker Filtrate (Hardwood)

S              Screen Room Sewer

B              Bleach Plant Sewer (Hardwood and Softwood)

BA             Bleach Plant Acid Sewer

BC             Bleach Plant Caustic Sewer

C              First Stage Cl- Filtrate (Hardwood and Softwood)

CS             First Stage Cl_ Filtrate (Softwood)

CH             First Stage Cl_ Filtrate (Hardwood)

E              First Stage Caustic Extract Filtrate  (Hardwood and Softwood)

ES             First Stage Caustic Extract Filtrate  (Softwood)

EH             First Stage Caustic Extract Filtrate  (Hardwood)

E-             Second Stage Caustic Extract Filtrate

A              Acid Sewer

AS             Acid Sewer (Softwood)

AH             Acid Sewer (Hardwood)

Al             Alkaline Sewer (Caustic Sewer)

A1S            Alkaline Sewer (Softwood)

A1H            Alkaline Sewer (Hardwood)

W              Woodyard Sewer

H              Hypochlorite Filtrate (Hardwood and Softwood)
                          111-40

-------
                              TABLE 6
                            (Continued)
Code           Mill Location Sampled

HS             Hypochlorite Filtrate (Softwood)

HH             Hypochlorite Filtrate (Hardwood)

CD             Chlorine Dioxide (Hardwood and Softwood)

CD2            Chlorine Dioxide (Second Stage)

PaM            Paper Mill Sewer

PM             Pulp Mill Sewer

R&E            Recovery and Evaporator Sewer

PI             Primary Treatment Influent

PE             Primary Treatment Effluent

SI             Secondary Treatment Influent

SE             Secondary Treatment Effluent

FE             Final Effluent
                          111-41

-------
                                                               TABI.K 7

                                            COI.OK liY NCASf  METHOD AT Ai,L .SAMPLE LOCATIONS
                                     (Refer  to Table 6  for  Sample (.ocnLion Code Ident i f ication)

  lil eai:hiil|;   Day of   Wood Spm: i-U                                               M.I.H Location Sampler!
Mill. No .
100
101
102
10313
Sequence Survey
A-Unc 1
CEHDII 2
H-l.ine 3
CEIII) Average
CKIIDII 1
2
3
Average
CEDED 1
2
3
Average
CEIIEI) I
2
3
Average
Soft
56%
54%
54%
54%
HA
3%
65%
92%
40%
38%
39%
40%
39%
0%
68%
20%
31%
Hard
44%
46%
46%
46%
96%^
30%
7%''
56%'
62%
61%
60%
61%
100%
32%
80%
69%
Color (m^/1)
BA
1. , 500
1 ,060
910
1,160
8
9,060
3,730
1,340
4,710
BUa
590
580
560
580
D
3,830
3,170
4,350
3,780
BC
3,810
4,210
2,620
3,550
C
990
810
1 , 360
1,050
B
970
1,190
980
1,050
B
960
990
990
980
A
1,440
1 , 060
1 ,310
1,270
E
7,300
15,300
22,280
14,960
W
100
93
58
84
R&E
1,360
510
320
730
PM
1 ,0]0
880
1,220
1 ,040
A
1,720
1,500
1,560
1,590
PI
145
230
230
200
PaM
16
49
66
44
PI
1,010
850
1,010
960
PI
'8909
1,7709
.1 , 900
.1,480
PE
130
185
230
180
PE
1,020
960
560
850
PE
1 ,060
1,170
1,380
1 , 200
SE
1,200
1 ,180
1,220
1,200
11.
120
110
100
110
14
1,060
1,340
1,340
1,250
SI
1,040
1,180
1,070
1,100
FE
1,220
1 , 1 80
1,180
1,190
12
220
310
400
310
SE
1,360
.1,950
1,310
1,540
SE FE
1,330 1,340
1,290 1,290
1,060 1,290
1,230 1,310
10
640
620
560
610
FE
1,750
2,250
1,720
1,910
1 2
33 740
8 280
16 320
19 450
1.   Ash pond decant                                     10.   Spill  pond effluent

2.   Sludge 1,'igoon decant:                                lla.  One recovery boiler out of three was  down.  Decker  color might
                                                             be higher than normal.
J.   Six percent, transition pulp from softwood  to
     hardwood                                           11.   Oxidation pond effluent

4.   One percent transition pulp from hardwood  to        12.   Spillway
     softwood
                                                        13.   Mill had a major spill upon startup after  1975  holidays.   Due
5.   Five percent transition puip from softwood                to this problem, color measurements  taken  of  treated  effluent
     to hardwood                                              during sampling period will be higher  than normal

6.   One percent transition pulp from hardwood  to        14.   Intermediate aeration effluent
     softwood

7.   Four percent transition pul p

8.   tJrown stock sewer

9.   Gampler ma I function, grab sample was analyzed

-------
Mill No.
 105
 108
Bl earh i il};
Si'qnem-e

Softwood
CKIIHKI)
Ha rdwood
CEIini)






CEDED




CEDE/ III)




CIIEDED
3-l,ines
Mi) Is A,B&C






l):iy of
Su rvey

1
2
3
Average

1
2
3
Average

1
2
3
Average

1
2
3
Average

1
2
3
Average

I
2
3
Average
Wood _Sj»ur ie
Soft Hard

522
542
537.
537,

522
542
537,
532

412
1002
397,
607,

1 002
1002
1002
1002

732
712
722
722

732
712
72%
722

4 HZ
462
472
472

487.
462
472
472

592
07
61%
402

02
02
02
02

272
297,
282
282

272
292
282
282
mi
2,920
2,460
2.58015
2,650
SE
2 , 320
-
2,360
2,340
D
1 ,350
920
:i , 030
1,100
OS
3,450
3,790
2,770
3,340

Mill A-
Mill B-
MI11 C-

B
890
1,630
1,170
1,230
I)S
2,160
1,720
85015'
1,940
FE
1,950
_
2,580
2,260
C
480
850
690
670
CS
530
650
590
590
C
390
49
823
NA
PF.
740
620
485
620
TAIiLli 7
(Continued)
CM
440
16 235
16 1 50
279





K
2,770
7,530
5 , 1 00
3,130
ES
6,040
6,220
6,040
6,100
II
6,230
310
-
NA
ST.
1,310
1,420
1,630
1,450
CS
530
390
215
380





A
205
470
360
345
BA
495
620
485
530
20
-
-
11,330
NA
FE.
1,170
1,330
1 , 310
1,270
Mil 1
I'll
840
61.0
400
620





Al
2,950
8,750
5,560
5,750
BC
3,340
3,670
3,450
3,490
E
4,560
570
-
NA
FE,,
1,250
1,310
1 ,250
1,270
Location Sampled
Color (nig/ 1 )
K.S
1 6 , 01 0
1 6 , 01 0
1 1,090
14,370





PF.
_ 1 /
1 ,010
810
910
SE
1 , 090
820
910
940
CD
49
41
530
NA
21
22,020
26,390
25,980
24,800
A W
1,220
1 ,180 2,250
940 1,330
1,110 1,790





SI FE
56018 ])830
L.410 1,780
1,170 1,640
1,050 1,750
FE
1,420
1,310
-
1,420
E, CD.,
'0 24
49 16
550 0
NA NA





VI SI
2,130 1,900
1,120 1,240
2,250 1,510
1,830 1,550





19
910
-
-
910















          15.   Pulp mill, was down for  2  of  the 12  samples

          16.   Decker was at 0 to half flow from 12:00  AM  to
                6:00 AM, or 4 of  the  12  samples (3rd  day's
                data @ this point was  discarded).

          17.   Primary clarifier  down, sample  taken at  bypass  ditch
18.   Low color at the secondary influent probably related to
      primary clari fier being bypassed.   Ad j ustment in secon-
      dary influent will be made by adding the first day's
      bypass ditch color load to that of the secondary influent

19.   Primary clarifier bypass ditch

20.   Hypochlorite plus caustic extract filtrate,  Mill C

21.   Strong waste pond effluent

-------
I 14
BU'ai-liing
Sequence
CEDED
A- Line
CEIII)
li-l.ine
CEMDUD
Softwood
Ha rdwood
CIIDED
CEIII) El)
Day of
1
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
Wood t
S.Tf t
17%
79%
0%
30%
54%
61%
76%
63%
46%
61%
487.
51%
25%
26%
24%
25%
100%
1 00%
100%
100%
1007.
100%
100%
1.00%
ipeeu'
lla rd
83%
21%
1 00%
70%
46%
39%
24%
37%
54%
39%
52%
49%
75%
74%
76%
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
TABU! 7
(Cont Inued)
I)
360
1 , 800
600
920
CH
610
460
470
510
Dil
10,380
8,670
8,850
9,300
D
3,650
4,530
4,960
4,380
CS
1,240
1 , 000
1 , 160
1 , 1 30
23
240
240
C
320
570
450
CS
590
860
680
710
DS
4 , 330
2,390
1,720
2,810
C
330
320
360
340
ES
4,290
5,810
7,900
6,000
24
1,210
1,210
E
5,900
11,160
4 , 2.1 0
7,090
EH
11 ,160
13,970
7,330
10,820
CH
170
210
165
180
E
2,930
3,440
2,930
3,100
BS
405
900
920
740
PI
1,750
650
1 , 080
ES
9,630
17,370
20,220
15,740
CS
850
1,020
1,020
960
A
250
290
300
280
R6.E
330
76
140
180
Mill
Ci
FT
950"
1,650
740
1,110
PI
1,800
1 ,090
1,020
1,300
ES
12,580
1.2,530
9,880
11,660
FT
1,430
2,050
1 ,450
1,640
A
1,240
1,060
1 , 1 20
1,140
Location Sampled
>lor (mg/1)
SI
850
1,480
1 ,040
1,120
SI
1 ,400
1,250
1,090
1,250
1111
540
590
740
620
SI
1,040 '
1,210
1 ,010
1,090
22
7
0
4
4
SE
1,060
1 ,090
1 , 1.00
1 ,080
FE
1 , 250
1,440
1 ,650
1,450
PI
.1,150
1,230
2,080
1,490
FE
2 , 160
2,130
1,930
2,070
PaM
76
33
175
90
FE
1,060
1,020
1 ,020
1,030
PE
1,140
1,120
1,590
1,280
PI
490
425
500
470
FE
1,540
1,630
1,520
1,560
PE
250
500
510
420
FE
740
670
820
740
         22.   RecanstJclzing Sewer

         23.   Digester  condensate

         24.   Combined  evaporator condensate

         25.   Mi.] I  117  adds hypochlor i te to the first stage caustic extraction  filtrate
               being sewered to minimi 7,e color

-------
> :ILL: 3072835     rBorrower: SLA     :ReqDate: 19990826 :NeedBefore: 19990925
  :Status: SHIPPED                     :RecDate:          :RenewalReq:
  :OCLC: 25882050   :Source: OCLCILL   :DueDate: 19991007 :NewDueDate:
  :Lender: EJB,EJB,*EJB                                                      1
> :CALLNO:  EPAX 9205-0092 f
^ :TITLE:   Review of color waste loads and color technologies for bleached
kraft mills / f
> :IMPRINT: [Washington, D.C.] :  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1978. I
> :VERIFIED: OCLC I
^ :PATRON:  susan darling f
> :SHIP TO:  Social Law Library/1200 Court House/Boston, MA 02108/
ATTN:Interlibrary Loan 1
> :BILL TO:  Same I
> :SHIP VIA: First Class           :MAXCOST: Postage  :COPYRT COMPLIANCE: CCG f
> :BORROWING NOTES: Postage reimbursed if billed 1
> :LENDING CHARGES:                :SHIPPED: 19990909 :SHIP INSURANCE:        f
^ :LENDING RESTRICTIONS:  I
> :LENDING NOTES:  BdJ^too large to send via First Class, so shipped via UPS.I
> :RETURN TO: U.S. EPA/HQ LIBRARY /ILL-3404/401 M STREET SW/WASHINGTON,
D.C.,20460/(202) 260-5933/FAX #(202) 260-5153. H
^ -.RETURN VIA: First class mail f

-------
Mill  No.
           Sequence __ Su rv
                      liny of   Wood Specie
                      Su rve-y   So f t_   Ha rd
 I 25
 I 19
121    Bleach Plant I
         CEIIEU
      Bleach Plant 2
         CEDED
          CEDED
       Newsprint-CKII
       Coaled Paper
          CE1III
                           I      25%     75%
                           2      25%     75%
                           3      2_5%     75%
                       Average   25%     75%
                          I       42%     58%
                          2      42%     58%
                          3      42%     58%
                       Average   42%     58%
                                 57%    43%
                                 58%    42%
                                 52%    48%
                                 56%    44%
                          L      69%     31%
                          2      79%     21%
                          3      100%      0%
                       Average   81%     18%
                                 100%
                               100%
                                 92%
 0%
15%
 0%
14%
 8%
TABLE 7
(Cout inued)
C
570
530
820
640
CS
980
1,010
780
920
S
4,500
4,370
2,690
3,850
A
740
850
610
730
n
2,460
2,560
1,110
2,040
E
3,000
4,910
3,170
3,690
HS
3,900
4,040
3,670
3,870
CS
1,020
1,070
680
920
Al
10,580
4,640
6,540
7,250
C
1,030
1,310
1,140
1,160
PI
790
770
960
840
CH
640
670
370
560
ES
8,690
8,690
5,330
7,570
R&E
6,890
6,420
1,220
4,840
F.
7,540
12,130
7,780
9,150
SI
960
1 ,060
1,070
1,030
till
2,930
3,140
2,500
2,860
CM
560
1 ,270
590
810
1'E
4,300
4,510
4,660
4,490
AT
4,400
5,850
5,100
Mill Location Sampled
Color (nig/1)
I'M
940
1,180
1 ,250
1 , 1.20
PI
870
810
660
780
Ell
5,470
7,920
4,110
5,830
SI
2,370
3,380
2,040
2,600
W
6,620
11,330
8,980
27
.100
230
320
220
PE
1,080
880
690
880
B
1,040
1 , 300
1,070
1,140
SE
1,910
2,160
1,270
1 ,780
PE
2,340
3,290
2,800
2,810
28
1,620
2,220
850
1,560
SK
490
540
480
500
PK SI
980 1,460
660 1 , 380
780 1,090
810 1,310
FE
1 ,660
1 ,830
1,160
1,550
SI SE
1,800 1,590
2,040 1,520
2,190 1,660
2,010 1,590
FE
1,530
1,470
1 , 500
1 , 500
FE
.1,450
1,440
1 ,460
NoL'es:    26.  Sodium hypochl or i te  is  added  to the extraction stajje tower

          27.  No. 2 Lagoon  Influent

          28.  No. 2 Lagoon  Effluent

-------
Itlca.-liinj;
Sei|(IUlK-e
CEDED
CEIIDEI)
Mill 1= 1
Mill 2=2
Suf twooci
CElin
Ha rdwood
CEII
A-Pine
C Mil III!
C-l'iiu-
CEIIEI)
l)-ll;i rdwood
cnr.iin
Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
:)
Average
1
2
3
Average
I.
2
n 3
Average
1
2
3
Avern ye
Wood Spec ie
Soft
1007.
100%
100%
[007,
1007.
100Z
100%
100%
IOOZ
1002
1002
100%
34%
372
34%
35%
58%
61%
6.1 1
60%
Hard
0%
0%
oz
0%
oz
oz
0%
0%
02
02
02
0%
662
632
662
652
42%
39%
39%
402

I)S
1,330
1 , 330
1 ,070
1 ,240
UjS
455
33
240
31
680
1 , 280
1,850
1,270
S
1,500
.1 , 250
1 , 330
1,360
I,34
14,510
13,840
11,740
.1 3 , 360

CS
990
1 , 360
2 , 1 60
1,500
PS
590
480
455
410
32
100
240
120
150
CS
1,120
1,040
680
950
A35
2,110
1,970
1 ,660
1,910
TAUI.K 7
(Continued)
ES
1:1 ,670
13,800
11,670
12,380
C1S
540
640
590
33
145
2,700
2,840
1,900
ES
17,190
17,910
16,470
17,190
ES-A
12,110
16,450
15,790
14,780
«c29
AS
660
920
1 ,120
900
C?S
395
730
380
500
PI
2,040
2,840
2,840
2,570
CH
600
820
490
640
ES-C
24,490
17 , 320
17,890
19,900
Mil 1 1
C
-------
llluai:hing Day of
Mill No. Sequence Survey

140 CEIIEI) 1
2
3
Average

1 52 CEIl 1
with soait.' pulp 2
blearhed in 4th 3
stage "P" Average


161 Softwood 1
CEIII)-'7 2
. Hardwood 3
CEIII) Average

Io7 CEDE/HI) 1
2
3
Average
Wood
Soft

0%
0%
0%
0%

4-5%
4-5%
4-5%
4-5%


41%
46%
48%
45%

0%
0%
0%
0%
Spec ie
lla'rd

1 00%
100%
100%
100%

95-96%
95-96%
95-96%
95-96%


59%
54%
52%
55%

100%
1 00%
100%
100%
TAIII.E 7
(Continued)
1)11
1 ,270
1 ,630
1,700
1 , 530
1)11
5 , 600
5,740
5,500
5,610

I)S
4 , IIO^8
4 , 790
7,970
5,690
Cll
1 , 180
990
960
1,040
Cll
950
1,120
1,090
1,050
Cll
650
350
460
490

Dll
4,590."
3,790
5,350
4,580
Ell
4,310
6,070
5,820
5,400
EH
1,720
2,070
1 ,980
1,920
Ell
6,700
4,550
5,740
5,700

CS
_40
910^1
1,040
980
W
770
-
370
570
PI:
1,040
.1,220
1 ,360
1,210
PI
930
850
650
810

ES
11 ,350'H
9,640
12,1 60
1 1 , 050
K&E
960
3,670
1,150
1,930
Mill Location Sampled
Color (ing/1)
SI
1 ,180
1,360
1,270
1 ,270
PE
810
470
550
610

Cll
690
400
850
650
PI
1,340
2,390
2,820
2,180
SE36
1 ,040
1 ,170
1,070
1,090
I'K
650
640
590
630
42
Ell
4,780
3,520
4 , 940
4,410
ST.
2,010
2,320
2,040
2,120










43 44
Al A10
3,560 950
3,950 530
4,480 960
4,000 810
FE
1,920
1,850
2,010
1,930











A
320
465
710
500





NULUS:    36.  Mill Wiis clown for  L7 clays  approximately 3 weeks before
                sainpl Jn^.  There fore,  final  effluent samples could
                luive  been a f feu ted.

          37.  P.'trL of nuirkct pulp goes  through  CEII bleaching only

          38.  So I twoiKi h I enc'h  p 1 ant down for"  5  of 12 samp] es

          39.  One of  12  samples  not taken  because of samp]ing problem

          40.  Unable  to  get sample at first stage softwood  Cl?
                filtrate
41.   Two of 12 samp 1es  not  co11ected

A2.   Some samples  at  the  fi rst stage  hardwood caustic extract
      were not collected  because sample point was not ac-
      cessible.  Day  I  -  2  of  1.2 samples;  Day 2 - 3 of 12,
      and Day 3 -  0  of  12

43.   Alkali ne pulp mill sewer

44.   Alkaline paper  mill  sewer

-------
                                                                          TABLE 8
                                                              COLOR LOAD BY SAMPLE LOCATION
Mill N.I
 1.02
Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
4
Average
1
2
3
A
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
Flow contim

L
ISA
23.02 (50.70)
1.6.06 (3.r).38)
13.79 (30.38)
17.63 (38.83)
SI*
1.61.36(355.42)
.187.77(413.58)
166.21(366. 10)
171.84(378.50)
71
102.98(226.82)
56.53(12/1.51)
22.85 (50.32)
60.78(133.88)
FE1
114.63(252.49)
114.00(251.11)
131.44(298.51)
120.02(264.37)
,,3
6.26 (13.79)
6.15 (13.55)
5.94 (13.08)
6.12 (13.47)
103
14.84 (32.68)
19.61 (43.20)
24.70 (54.41)
19.72 (43.43)
lously recorded
Co lor Load -Thou sand
BCA
2.89 (6.36)
3.19 (7.03)
1.98 (4.37)
2.69 (5.92)
SE*
206.59(455.05)
205.27(452.13)
164.65(362.67)
192.17(423.28)
C*
10.05 (22.14)
8.84 (19.47)
15.05 (33.14)
.11.31 (24.92)
83
1.21 (2.67)
1.18 (2.59)
1.06 (2.34)
1.15 (2.53)
B'
55.12(12.1.42)
70.33(154.92)
57.55(126.76)
61.00(134.37)
6. Sludge lagoon
Mill Location Sampled
Kilograms Par Day (Thousand
A4
32.73 (72.10)
24.09 (53.07)
29.78 (65.59)
28.87 (63.59)
FEV
187.84(413.75)
122.19(269.13)
215.04(473.66)
175.02(385.51)
E*
35.13 (77.37)
78.26(172.37)
102.14(224.98)
71.84(158.24)
w3
0.76 (1.67)
0.70 (1.55)
0.44 (0.97)
0.64 (1.40)
decant
Pounds Per Day)
PM*
37.50 (82.60)
32.69 (71 .97)
45.30 (99.77)
38.49 (84.78)
53
0.50 (1.1.0)
0.12 (0.27)
0.24 (0.53)
0.30 (0.65)
A1
26.07 (57.42)
23.87 (52.57)
25.41 (55.98)
25.12 (55.32)
PI3
10.77 (23.72)
17.08 (37.62)
17.08 (37.62)
14.98 (32.99)

PI4
137.75(303.42)
119.15(262.45)
137.75(303.42)
131.55(289.76)
t,"
2.81 (6.18)
1.06 (2.34)
1.2.1 (2.67)
1.69 (3.73)
PI4
82.96(182.73)
65.75(144.83)
126.74(279.17)
135.33(298.09)
102.70(226.21)
PE3
9.65 (21.26)
13.37 (29.44)
17.08 (37.62)
13.37 (29.44)

PE4
140.56(309.60)
159.58(351.49)
182.99(403.06)
161.04(354.72)
SEA
91.39(201.29)
105.95(233.38)
107.24(236.21)
101.53(223.63)
91
8.09 (17.83)
6.96 (15.33)
6.17 (13.60)
7.08 (15.59)
          3.  Flow estimated by  the mill      7.   Brown stock sewer




          4.  Flow calculated by the  mi.ll     8.   Spill pond effluent




          5.  Ash pond decant                 9.   Oxidation pond effluent





                                              10.  Spillway

-------
Mill No.
103
105
106
Day ol~
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
L
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1.
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average

,/'
30.03 (66. 16)
27.26 (60.05)
37.58 (82.77)
31.63 (69.66)
sir1
81.77(180. 11)
119.39(262.97)
77.43(170.54)
92.86(204.54)
n,,4
9.40 (20.71)
7.92 (17.45)
8.31 (18.30)
8.54 (18.82)
A1
105. 16(231 .62)
104.88(231.01)
77.46(170.61)
95.83(211.08)
I:
D
33.25 (73.23)
2H.23 (62.19)
28.88 (63.61)
30. 12 (66.34)
SI*
56.44(124.31)
U5. 31 (320. 06)
130.33(287.06)
110.69(243.81)
Color Load Thousand
B1
28.23 (62.17)
29.10 (64.11)
27.27 (60.06)
28.20 (62.11)
FE1
105.22(231.76)
137.75(303.42)
91.49(201.52)
111.49(245.57)
DS*
7.69 (16.94)
6.12 (13.49)
3.03 (6.67)
5.62 (12.37)
w1
6.05 (13.33)
5.90 (12.99)
5.97 (13.16)
C" .
10.91 (24.03)
21.26 (46.82)
18.04 (39.73)
16.73 (36.86)
FE3
152.53(335.98)
148.37(326.80)
136.70(301.10)
145.87(321.29)
TABLE 8
(Continued)
Mill Location Sampled
Kilograms Per Day (Thou
R&EA
26.69 (58.78)
10.57 (23.28)
6.8L (15.01)
14.69 (32.36)
CH4
7.03 (15.49)
3.76 (8.28)
2.40 (5.28)
4.39 (9.68)
PI1
171.73(378.25)
92.42(203.56)
195.63(430.91)
153.26(337.57)
E*
37.78 (83.22)
102.70(226.22)
69.56(153.22)
70.02(154.22)
123
49.99(110.12)
49.99(110.12)
sand Pounds Per Day)
PaM1
0.18 (0.39)
0.54 (1.19)
0.68 (1.49)
0.46 (1.02)
cs<
11.99 (26.40)
8.82 (19.43)
4.86 (10.71)
8.56 (18.85)
SI*
276.57(609.19)
186.65(411.12)
227.28(500.62)
230.11(506.85)
A3
6.99 (15.40)
16.03 (35.30)
12.28 (27.04)
LI. 76 (25.91)

PEA
31 .34 (69.03)
30.55 (67.29)
17.65 (38.88)
26.51 (58.40)
EH4
3.95 (8.69)
2.86 (6.31)
1.88 (4.14)
2.90 (6.38)
SE*
397.55(875.67)
410.13(903.37)
403.84(889.52)
. Al3
40.24 (88.63)
119.35(262.88)
75.84(167.04)
78.47(172.85)

II3
63.73(140.38)
82.04(180.70)
79.20(174.44)
74.99(165.17)
ES*
106.15(233.81)
106'. 15(233. 81)
73.53(161.96)
95.28(209.86)
FE2
334.15(736.02)
448.37(987.59)
391.26(861.80)
PE<
55.87(123.06)
51.56(113.56)
53.71(118.31)
.1.  Flow continuously recorded




2.  Flow measured and calculated




3.  Flow estimated by the mill.




4.  Flow calculated by the mill




1.1.  Intermediate aeration effluent




12.  Primary cJarifier by-pass ditch

-------
Mill No.
 107
 108
Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
:i
2
3
Average

/:
I)S
J2.03 (26.49)
16.51 (36.37)
9.'J7 (21.96)
12.83 (28.27)
FEJ
76.36(1.68.20)
65.81(144.96)
71.09(156.58)
Mi 1 1
A
IS
C
Mill
A
11
C
Bl
84.30(185.68)
156.86(345.50)
124.11(273.38)
121.84(268.38)
D3
2.05 (4.51)
10.23 (22.53)
3.41 (7.51)
5.23 (11.51)
SK3
112.45(247.69)
119.76(263.79)
129.19(284.57)
1.20.47(265.35)
Color Load-Thousand
CS<
6.08 (13.40)
9.33 (20.56)
6.95 (15.31.)
7.45 (.16.42)
C*
4.05 (8.92)
0.96 (2.12)
0.71 (1.56)
NA
O
0.21 (0.46)
0.39 (0.87)
NA
PE1
124.76(274.81)
107.11(235.93)
88.57(195.08)
106.82(235.28)
c3
9.70 (21.36)
17.27 (38.05)
13.48 (29.70)
KE1
108.43(238.84)
108.21(238.34)
115.94(255.37)
110.86(244.18)
TABLE 8
(Cout.inued)
Mil. 1. Local: i.un Sampled
Kilograms Per Day (Thousand
ES4
64.53(142.14)
83.19(183.23)
66.36(146.18)
71.36(157.18)
,1*
37.76 (83.18)
2.47 (5.44)
NA
CD,*
0.10 '(0.21)
0.09 (0.20)
NA
si1
347.91(766.33)
387.35(853.20)
474.89(1046.02)
403.40(888.55)
E3
67.06(147.71)
.126.85(279.40)
47.87(105.40)
80.59(177.50)
Pounds Per Day)
BA*
5.68 (12.52)
8.90 (19.61)
5.72 (12.59)
6.77 (14.91)
43*
57.10(125.75)
NA
FE1
75.35(165.98)
85.66(188.68)
79.41(174.91)
80.14(176.53)
PI.2
34.49 175.97)
73.66(162.25)
25.44 (56.03)
44.53 (98.08)

BC4
18.60 (40.97)
25.58 (56.35)
19.74 (43.47)
21.31 (46.93)
E*
12.09 (26.64)
1.61 (3.56)
NA
PE,1
242.39(533.90)
272.97(601.26)
288.41(635.26)
270.96(596.83)
Pip2
65.92(145.20)
121.53(267.68)
52.74(116.16)
80.06(176.35)

SE*
47.62(104.88)
36.27 (79.90)
39.75 (87.56)
41.06 (90.45)
CD4
0.19 (0.42)
0.16 (0.36)
1.77 (3.89)
NA
141
45.88(101.06)
99.98(220.22)
67.92(149.60)
71.26(156.97)
SI*
94.29(207.69)
171.30(377.32)
114.82(252.91)
126.74(279.17)
Notes:     1.   FJow continuously recorded     4.   Flow calculated by the mill




          2.   Flow measured and calculated   13. Hypochlorite plus caustic extract filtrate, Mill C




          3.  Flow estimated by the mill      14. Strong waste pond effluent

-------
             Day 11 f
             Survey
                                           Cok
114
               I
               2
               3
            Average
               3
            Average
            Average
               I
               2
               3
            Average
               I
               2
               3
            Average
                             o.m  (2.oo)
                             £._52  (I. 14)
                             0:99  "(2.17)
130.24(286.87)
132.03(290.82)
163.79(360.77)
142.02(31.2.82)
                                1)11
                                  ,3
 55.06(121.27)
 45.99(.IOI .30)
 46.94(103.40)
 49.33(108.66)
                                PI
189.53(417.47)
198.53(437.28)
338.08(744.67)
242.05(533.14)

      I)3
 12.44 (27.41)
 15.45 (34.02)
 16.91 (37.25)
 14.94 (32.90)
                                VE
267.60(589.42)
249.35(549.24)
204.74(450.96)
240.56(529.87)
TAISI.E 8
(Conl inued)
Mill Location Samp.led
r Load Thousand Kilograms Per Day (Thousand Pounds Per Day)
..
CS
1.05 (2.31)
1.63 (3.59)
1.42 (3.12)
1.37 (3.01)
DS3
22.97 (50.59)
12.68 (27.94)
9.13 (20.10)
14.92 (32.87)
PE3
187.88(413.84)
180.77(398.17)
258.43(569.24)
209.03(460.42)
c3
14.76 (32.50)
14.31 (31.51)
16.09 (35.45)
15.05 (33.15)
3
Ell
16.49 (36.32)
16.41 (36.14)
5.00 (11.01)
12.63 (27.82)
CH3
2.64 (5.82)
3.26 (7.19)
2.57 (5.65)
2.82 (6.22)
FE*
239.22(526.92)
247.64(545.47)
293.71(646.93)
260.19(573.11)
E3
42.85 (94.38)
50.30(110.8])
42.85 (94.38)
45.34 (99.86)
3
KS
17.15 (37.77)
36.20 (79.73)
42.14 (92.81)
31 .83 (70.10)
cs3
12.23 (26.96)
14.69 (32.35)
14.69 (32.35)
L3.87 (30.55)





A2
14.96 (32.96)
.17.25 (37.99)
17.73 (39.05)
16.65 (36.67)
3
PI
187.54(413.09)
99.94(220.13)
101.25(223.02)
129.88(286.08)
ES3
33.36 (73.49)
33.23 (73.20)
26.20 (57.72)
30.94 (68.14)





PI2
109.71(241.65)
132.49(291.82)
85.15(187.55)
109.12(240.35)
1
SI
145.87(321.29)
114.61(252.45)
108.20(238.33)
122.89(270.69)
HH3
1.43 (3.15)
1.57 (3.45)
1.96 (4.32)
1.65 (3.64)





SI1
131.60(289.87)
154.95(341.29)
125.51(276.45)
137.35(302.54)
         1.  Flow continuously recorded

         2.  Flow measured and calculated

         3.  Flow estimated by the. mill

         4.  Flow calculated by the mill

-------
Day of
Mill No. Survey
117 1
Average
1
2
3
Average
1 18 1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
119 1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average

cs3
7.05 (15.
5.6H (12.
6.59 (14.
6.44 (14.
0.88 (1.
0.35 (0.
1 . 92 (4 .
1.05 (2.
c3
4.97 (10.
4.62 (10.
7.1.5 (1.5.
5.58 (12.
193
0.55 (1.
0.76 (1.
0.29 (0.
0.54 (1.
c:s3
5.57 (L2.
5.74 (12.
4.43 (9.
5.25 (11.
SEA
21.91 (48.
23.2.3 (53.
21.28 (46.
22.41 (49.
Co

52)
52)
52)
19)
93)
77)
24)
31)
94)
17)
74)
28)
.22)
,67)
64)
,18)
27)
64)
76)
,56)
.25)
.17)
.87)
.36)
TABI.K 8
(Cone i nued)
Mill Location Sampled
lor Load-Thousand Kilograms Per Day (Thousand Founds Per Day)
ES
16.25
22.01
29.93
22.73
PI
23.04
19.58
22.42
21.65
E
10.23
16.74
L0.81
3
(35.80)
(48.48)
(65.93)
(50.07)
1
(50.75)
(43.13)
(49.39)
(47.69)
3
(22.53)
(36.88)
(23.81)
1.2.59 (27.74)
HS3
6.06
6.27
5.70
6.01
(13.34)
(.13.82)
(12.56)
(13.24)
BS
4.15
9.21
9.41
7.59
1'E
1.1.75
23.04
22.78
19.19
PI
.12.27
11 . 38
1.8.19
13.95
CM
4.85
5.08
2.81.
4.24
3
(9.13)
(20.28)
(20.73)
(16.71)
I
(25.89)
(50.74)
(50. 18)
(42.27)
4
(27.03)
(25.06)
(40.06)
(30.72)
3
(10.68)
(11.18)
(6.18)
(9.35)

0,
0,
0
0.
44
41
50
45,
14
15
20
16
4
4
3
4
R&E
.86 (1.90)
.20 (0.44)
.54 (.1.1.8)
.53 (1.17)
KE1
.46 (97.94)
.07 (90.46)
.76(1 11 .81)
.46(100.13)
si1
.91 (32.85)
.66 (34.50)
.27 (44.65)
.95 (37.33)
llll3
.55 (10.02)
.88 (10.74)
.88 (8.55)
.44 (9.78)

16.
13.
15.
15.
0.
0.
16,
19,
26.
20.
45.
39,
32,
38,
A1
25 (35.80)
.53 (29.81)
,23 (33.55)
01 (33.06)
163
,02 (0.04)
,02 (0.04)
FE*
.38 (36.09)
.66 (43.30)
,05 (57.37)
.70 (45.60)
PI1
.52 (93.66)
.59 (87.20)
.01 (70.50)
.04 (83.79)
15
1
Neg.
Neg.
Nee.
Neg.
1.73
4.52
4.52
18
0.04
0.08
0.11
0.07
PE
(9.96)
(9.96)
3
(0.08)
(0.17)
(0.24)
(0.16)
4
48.28(106.35)
39.34 (86.65)
30.59 (67.37)
39.40
(86.79)
.1.   Plow continuously recorded     16. Digester condensate




3.   Flow estimated by the mill     17. Combined evaporator condensate




4.   Flow calculated by the mill    J8. No. 2 Lagoon influent




15. R'jcausticizing sewer           19. No. 2 Lagoon decant

-------
125
Day of
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
TABLE 8
(Continued)
Mill Location Sampled
Color Load-Thousand Kilograms Per Day (Thousand founds Per Day)
s3
85.25(187.77)
82. 78(182. 34)
50.96(112.24)
72.99(160.78)
PC1
66.83(147.21)
47.01(103.55)
51.42(1 13.26)
55.09(121.34)
A1
9.81 (21.61)
11.37 (25.04)
7.81 (17.21)
9.67 (21.29)
cs3
25.12 (55.33)
26.35 (58.04)
16.74 (36.89)
22.74 (50.09)
si3
265.52(584.84)
255.15(562.01)
.195.75(431.17)
238.81(526.01)
Al1
175.57(386.72)
79.29(174.64)
11.2.25(247.24)
122.37(269.53)
ES3
82.31(181.30)
82.31(181.30)
50.48(111.20)
71 .70(157.93)
FE1
300.86(662.68)
286.27(630.55)
292.68(644.67)
293.27(645.97)
R&E3
5.22 (11.50)
4.87 (10.72)
0.93 (2.04)
3.67 (8.08)
CH3
8.70 (19.16)
26.46 (58.29)
12.29 (27.08)
15.82 (34.84)
PE1
91.72(202.03)
89.54(197.22)
109.82(241 .89)
97.02(213.71)
E,,3
22.80 (50.21)
45.01 (99.14)
23.36 (51.45)
30.38 (66.93)
SI1
169.26(372.82)
238.83(526.06)
150.49(331.47)
186.19(410.12)
B3
118.21(260.37)
147.76(325.47)
121.62(267.88)
129.19(284.57)
SE1
136.41(300.46)
152.63(336.18)
93.68(206.35)
127.57(281.00)
                I
                2
                3
             Average
                I.
                2
                3
                4
             Average
                1
                2
                3
                4
             Average
                                .,20
      D 	

  6.71 (14.78)
  6.98 (15.38)
  3.03  (6.67)
  5.58 (12.28)
                               SI
218.03(480.24)
250.11(550.91)
264.19(581.91)

244.11(537.69)
 27.51 (60.60)
 34.74 (76.52)
 37.27 (82.10)
 33.18 (73.08)
192.59(424.21)
186.36(410.48)
200.25(441.09)

193.07(425.26)
184.82(407.10)
262.87(579.01)
192.18(423.30)
213.30(469.82)

     FE1
232.71(512.57)
247.77(545.74)
211.69(466.27)

230.72(508.19)
    Al3
83.20(183.27)
72.35(159.36)
96.19(211.88)

83.92(184.84)
102.84(226.51)
176.00(387.66)

139.42(307.09)
     FE 	

135.64(298.77)
157.06(345.95)
133.98(295.11)
144.23(313.28)
         I.   Flow continuously recorded

         3.   Klow estimated by the mill

         4.   Flow calculated by  the mill

         20.  Mill was  not  discharging  to  the  river during  color  survey

-------
Mill No.
 .134
 136
Notes:
                 3
              Aver.ige
                 3
              Average
                 1
                 2
                 3
             Average
                1
                2
                3
             Average
                1
                2
                3
             Average
	IIS	
 10.08 (22.20)
 10.08 (22.20)
  8. 1.1 (17.86)
  9.42 (20.75)
153.94(339.07)
162.61(358.18)
125.49(276.40)
147.35(324.55)
                              1.14  (2.50)
                              1.09  (2.40)
                              1.26  (2.77)
                              1.16  (2.56)
                                 I'M
 51. 14(125.85)
 66.20(145.81)
 62.43(137.51)
 61.92(136.39)

      O3
 98.95(217.96)
 94.39(207.90)
 80.06(176.35)
 91.14(200.74)
                                 Pi
183.05(403.19)
201.49(443.80)
213.84(471.01)
199.46(439.33)
TABI.K 8
(Cont inued)
M L.l 1 Location Sampl ed
Co lor Load -Thou sand Ki 1 ograms Per Day (Thousand Pounds Per Day)
cs3
16.88 (37.18)
23.19 (51.07)
36.83 (81.12)
25.63 (56.46)
FE1
1.70.10(374.66)
183.30(403.75)
161 .40(355.51)
171.60(377.97)
CS*
8.95 (19.72)
9.30 (20.48)
7.70 (16.97)
8.65 (19.06)
PI1
56.16(123.71)
75.07(164.36)
57.33(126.28)
62.86(138.45)
A3
18.39 (40.50)
17.17 (37.81)
14.46 (31.86)
16.67 (35.72)
PFA
197.99(436.11)
191.98(422.87)
213.84(471.01)
201.27(443.33)
ES3
212.32(467.67)
250.97(552.79)
212.23(467.47)
225.17(495.98)
Es4
26.05 (57.38)
30.54 (67.26)
35.57 (78.34)
30.72 (67.66)
PE1
61.96(136.48)
55.98(123.30)
59.07(130.12)
59.01 (129.97)
ES3
39.46 (86.91)
53.60(118.06)
51.45(113.32)
48.17(106.10)
FE4
149.43(329.14)
172.97(381.00)
166.75(367.30)
163.05(359.15)
AS2
20.00 (44.06)
33.11 (72.94)
30.98 (68.23)
28.03 (61 .74)
CH*
5.55 (12.22)
8.48 (18.68)
5.42 (11. 94)
6.48 (14.28)
FE1
45.38 (99.96)
44.89 (98.87)
45.27 (99.72)
45.18 (99.52)
ESc3
26.9I"(59.27)
19.03 (41.92)
19.66 (43.30)
21.86 (48.16)
PI2
251.99(555.05)
117.98(259.87)
87.35(192.40)
152.44(335.77)
EH4
1.91 (4.20)
1.99 (4.38)
2.30 (5.07)
2.07 (4.55)
HH4
3.80 (8.38)
2.34 (5.16)
2.95 (6.50)
3.03 (6.68)
si*
169.40(373.12)
173.83(382.88)
146.70(323.13)
163.31(359.71)
PaM4
2.30 (5.06)
0.69 (1.52)
1.49 (3.29)
RiE3
7.80 (17.19)
2.06 (4.54)
4.93 (10.86)
          1.  Flow continuously recorded

          2.  Flow measured and calculated

          3.  Flow estimated by trlie mill

          4.  Flow calculated by the mill

          21. MiJl requested that color, in pounds per day, be deleted  because  data  was  of a confidential nature and should not be made
              public.  Informat Lon was nonetheless used in all evaluation  procedures^

-------
Mill No
 140
 152
 187
Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
•)
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
•J
Average
1
2
')
Average
1
2
3
Average
Co
im3
3.46 (7.63)
4.44 (9.79)
4.63 (1.0. 21.)
4.18 (9.21)
D*
31.83 (71). 10)
28.27 (62.67)
31. .26 (fi8.86)
30.45 (67.07)
us3
34.29 (75.53)
38. 1 1. (8:t.95)
63. 4.1 (J 19. 68)
42.26 (99.70)
V
147.02(323.83)
163. 12(359.31)
J69. 74(373. 87)
.159.94(352.29)
CM3
24.59 (54.16)
20.68 (45.44)
20.00 (44.06)
21.74 (47.89)
FEJ
154.22(339.69)
148.59(327.30)
.150.02(330.45)
150.95(332.48)
TA1II.H 8
(Cont i lined)
Mill l.ocaLion Sampled
lor Load-Thousand Kilograms Per Day (Thousand Pounds Per Day)
<:,,3
4.1.4 (9.1.2)
4.88 (10.75)
4.75 (10.46)
4.59 (10.11)
c"
6.40 (14.10)
2.65 (5.84)
4.53 (9.98)
4.53 (9.97)
,),,3
40.00 (88.10)
33.03 (72.75)
46.62(102.69)
39.88 (87.85)
A1,A
17.92 t39.48)
10.42 (22.96)
17.53 (38.62)
15.30 (33.71)
EH3
57.1,5(125.89)
80.49(177.30)
77.18(169.99)
71.61(157.73)
K,,3
6.51. (14.35)
7.84 (17.27)
7.50 (16.52)
7.29 (16.05)
^
24.12 (53.12)
13.24 (29.17)
20.66 (45.51)
19.34 (42.60)
cs*
10.34 (22.78)
12.34 (27.17)
.11.31 (24.91)
A4
9.70 (21.36)
14.97 (32.98)
21.52 (47.40)
15.33 (33.76)
w3
2.92 (6.43)
1.40 (3.09)
2.16 (4.76)
PI*
25.22 (55.54)
29.12 (64.14)
31.94 (70.36)
28.76 (63.35)
pr1
53.59(118.05)
45.12 (99.38)
47.26(104.10)
48.66(107.18)
KS«
30.97 (68.22)
26.30 (57.92)
33.17 (73.06)
30.14 (66.39)
R(,E3
14.55 (32.05)
55.62(122.51)
17.43 (38.39)
29.20 (64.32)
SI1
28.61 (63.02)
32.46 (71.50)
29.83 (65.71)
30.30 (66.74)
PE*
46.68(102.81)
24.95 (54.95)
39.99 (88.08)
37.31 (81.95)
CH*
8.52 (18.77)
5.11 (11.25)
10.89 (23.98)
8.19 (18.04)
PI3
66.00(145.38)
117.72(259.29)
138.90(305.94)
107.54(236.87)
SE<
25.22 (55.54)
29.93 (61.51)
25.13 (55.36)
26.09 (57.47)
FE*
37.46 (82.51)
33.97 (74.83)
42.90 (94.49)
38.11 (83.94)
EH4
13.04 (28.72)
9.60 (21.15)
13.47 (29.68)
12.04 (26.51)
SI3
144.69(318.71)
167.01(367.86)
146.85(323.46)
152.85(336.68)
Notes:    1.   Flow continuously recorded




          3.   V.low estimated by the mill




          4.   Flow calculated by the mill

-------
                                                                       TABLE  9




                                                            COLOR LOAD BY SAMPLE LOCATION





                                             (Uofer t.o Table (> for Sample Location  Code:  Idenci flea t ion)
Day of
Mill No. Survey
1 00 1
3
Average
1
')
3
Average
101 1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
4
Average
102 .1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average

I1A
32.0
24.0
20.0
20.5
SI
224
284
243
250
3
170.0
96.0
35.5
1.00.5
FK
190
193
203
195
n
12.0
10.5
10.5
11.0
6
28.5
33.5
43.0
35.0


(64)
(48)
(40)
(51)
(448)
(567)
(485)
(500)
(340)
(192)
(71)
(201)
(379)
(386)
(406)
(390)
(24)
(21)
(21)
(22)
(57)
(67)
(86)
(70)

HC
4.0
5.0
3.0
4.0
SE
287
310
240
279
C
16.5
15.0
23.0
18.0
4
2.0
2.0
1.5
2.0
B
106
120
1.01
109
Color

(8)
(10)
(6)
(8)
(573)
(619)
(480)
(557)
(33)
(30)
(46)
(36)
(4)
(4)
(3)
(4)
(211)
(239)
(201)
(217)
Mill LouaLion Sampled
Load - Kilograms/Thousand Kilograms (Pounds/Ton)
A
40.5
36.5
43.5
42.0
FE
261
185
314
253
E
58
133
.158
116
W
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0

(91)
(73)
(87)
(84)
(521)
(369)
(627)
(506)
(116)
(265)
(316)
(232)
(3)
(2)
(2)
(2)

52.0
49.5
66.0
56.0
0.7
0.2
. 0.4
0.5
43.0
40.5
39.5
41.0
20.5
29.0
30.0
26.5
I'M
(104)
(99)
(132)
(112)
1
(1.4)
(0.4)
(0.7)
(1.0)
A
(86)
(81)
(79)
(82)
PI
(41)
(58)
(60)
(53)

191
180
201
191
4.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
137
112
196
294
185
18.5
22.5
30.0
23.5
PI
(382)
(360)
(402)
(381)
2
(8)
(3)
(4)
(5)
PI
(274)
(223)
(392)
(588)
(369)
PE
(37)
(45)
(60)
(47)

195
24.1
267
234
151
180
166
166
15.0
12.0
11.0
13.0
PE
(390)
(481)
(534)
(468)
SE
(302)
(359)
(331)
(331)
5
(31)
(24)
(22)
(26)
Ash pond.




S1 ndge 1 ijgoon decant.
Brown stock sewer.
Spill pond effluent.




Oxidation pond.
                                                       Spillway.

-------
                                                                          TAIII.E 9

                                                                        (Cont i nuetl)
               llay of
Mill No

 I irj
 105
 106
                   1
                   2
                   3
               Average
                   3
               Average
               Average
                   1
                   2
                   3
               Average
                                65. 5
                                57.0
                               103.0
         (131)
         (I U)
         (206)
                                75.0
                                        (150)
                              	si;	
                               178      (356)
                               250      (500)
                               213      (425)
                               214
23.0
20.5
25.5
23.0
                                        (427)
 (46)
 (41)
 (51)
120
                               90.5
                               70.0
                               69.0
                               76.5
290
360
31 1
320
          (46)
1.24      (247)
124      (247)
1.13	(225)
         (240)
         (181)
         (140)
         (138)
                                        (153)
                                     SI
(579)
(719)
(621)
                                                   Mill. Location Sampled
                                   Color Load - Kj logranis/Thou.sand  Kilograms (Pounds/Ton)
         (640)

61.5
61 .0
75.0
66.0
229
289
252
257
17.5
13.5
8.5
13.0
7.0
8.5
8.0
29.5
52.5
43.0
41.5
415
367
326
370
H
(1.23)
U22)
(150)
(132)
FE
(458)
(577)
(503)
(513)
DS
(35)
(27)
(17)
(26)
W
(14)
(17)
(16)
C
(59)
(105)
(86)
(83)
FE
(830)
(734)
(652)
(739)

58.0
22.0
18.5
33.0
17.0
9.5
7.5
11 . 5
202
109
284
198
103
254
166
.174
136
136
R&E
(116)
(44)
(37)
(66)
Cll
(34)
(19)
(15)
(23)
PI
(403)
(128)
(568)
(396)
E
(205)
(508)
(332)
(348)
8
(272)
(272)

0.4
1 .0
2.0
1 .0
27.0
19.0
13.5
20.0
325
220
329
292
19.0
39.5
29.5
29.5
I'aM
(0.8)
(2.0)
(4.0)
(2.0)
cs
(54)
(38)
(27)
(40)
SI
(649)
(440)
(659)
(583)
A
(38)
(79)
(59)
(59)

68.0
64.0
48.5
60.0
9.5
7.5
6.0
7.5
467
484
475
110
296
1.81
196
PF.
(136)
(128)
(97)
(120)
Ell
(19)
(15)
(12)
(15)
SE
(933)
(967)
(950)
Al
(219)
(591)
(362)
(391)

114
172
218
176
241
230
202
224
392
529
461
139
123
131
7
(227)
(344)
(435)
(352)
ES
(481)
(459)
(403)
(448)
FE
(784)
(1,057)
(921)
PE
(277)
(246)
(262)
 Fntermedlate aeration
8
 Primary clari.fier  by-pass  di.tch.

-------
                                                                         TAHI.K 9

                                                                       (Continued)
M i I I  No

 1.07
                  3
               Average
                  I
                  2
                  3
               Average
                  'I
               Average
                  I
                  2
                  3
               Average
457
                                   Hi II
                                    A
                                    li
                                    C
                                   Mill
 77.5
135.0
115.0
(155)
(270)
(229)
                                                   Mi I.I  Locution Sampled
                            	Color  Load  - Ki lograms/'i'liousand Kilograms  (Pounds/Ton)
I)S CS
77
107
78
87

489
424
(IV.)
(213)
(156)
(174)
KE
(978)
(848)
39.0
60.0
54.5
51.0



(78)
(120)
(109)
(102)



413
536
518
489



ES
(826)
(1,072)
(1,037)
(978)



BA
36.5
57.5
44.5
46.0



(7.3)
(115)
(89)
(92)



BC
1 1.9
165
154
146



(238)
(329)
(308)
(292)



SE
305
23.1
311
282



(610)
(461)
(621)
(564)



                       3.5    (7)
                       1.0    (2)
                       0.5    (I)
                           NA

                           E
                     0
                     0.2
                     0.4
11.5
92.0
81.5
                                                               (0)
                                                             (0.4)
                                                             (0.7)
                                                          NA
109.0
         (218)
 (23)
(184)
(163)
                     61.5
                               (123)
34.5 (69)
2.0 (4)
NA
CD,.
~67I
0.1
0
(0.2)
(0.2)
(0)
NA
SI
319
334
438
364
(638)
(667)
(875)
(727)
                                                                                              52.5
69.0
73.5
73.0
                                                                             11.0
                                                                              1.5
                                                                                                        (105)
                                                                          (22)
                                                                           (3)
                                                                                  NA
(138)
(147)
(146)
231
235
266
                                                                72.0
                                                                          (144)
(461)
(470)
(532)
                                                                                      244
                                                                                               (488)
                                                                            0.2
                                                                            0.2
                                                                            1.5
                                                                                                                                               CD
42.0
86.0
62.5
                                                                                                           63.5
                                                    (0.3)
                                                    (0.3)
                                                    (3  )
                                                                                                        NA
                                                                                                                                                10
 (84)
(172)
(125)
                                                                                                           (127)
 llypochlori le plus caustic extract  filtrate, Mill  C.

  Strong waste ponil effluent.

-------
I ID
I II
                 3
              Avuraj
                               3.0
                              18.0
                               5. 5
                               9.0
          (6)
         (36)
         (II)
         (18)
167
213
204
                                      (334)
                                      (425)
                                      (408)
195
         (389)
                              6.5
                              5.0
                              5.0
                              5.5'
        (13)
        (10)
       -_Ci°J_
        (11)


14.5
30.5
-
22.5

161
192
183
179

3.5
5.5
4.5
4.5
Co l.o r
C
(29)
(61)
-
(45)
FE
(322)
(384)
(366)
(357)
CS
(7)
(11)
(9)
(9)
TAIil.K 9
(Continued)
MiJI. Location Sampled
Load - Kilograms/Thousand K:i l.ograms (Pounds/Ton)

99.5
226.0
75.5
133.5






69.0
87.5
47.0
68.0
E
(199)
(451)
(151)
(267)





EH
(138)
(175)
(94)
(136)
IMA
51
131
40
74





ES
60.5
121.0
127.0
102.5
PIB
(102)
(262)
(80)
(148)






(121)
(242)
(253)
(205)
98.0
216.0
83.5
132.5






359
207
231
266
(196)
(432)
(167)
(265)





PI
(718)
. (414)
(461)
(531)
140
305
182
209






280
235
246
254
• si
(279)
(609)
(363)
(417)





SI
(559)
(470)
(492)
(507)
                             250
                             271
                             T7JL
                             298
         (499)
         (542)
         (745)
         (595)
 98.5
152.0
 93. 5
114.5
(197)
(303)
(187)
(229)
                                                        US
                     48.5"
                     26.5
                     19.5
                                                  31.5
                                                             (97)
                                                             (53)
                                                             (39)
                                                             (63)
                                                                              CH
                      4.5
                     11.0
                      5.0
                                                                         7.0
           (9)
          (22)
          (10)
                                                                                  (14)
            26.0
            31 .0
            31.5
                                                                                             29.5
                                                                          (52)
                                                                          (62)
                                                                          (63)
                                                                                                       (59)
                                                                                                                        ES
                                                                            70.5
                                                                            70.0
                                                                            66.0
                                                                                                                  65.5
(141)
(140)
(112)
                                                                                                                            (131)
2.5
5.0
4.0
                                                                                                                                         4.0
                                                                                                                                              HI!
 (5)
(10)
 (8)
                                                                                                                                                 (8)
                                   PI.
                                                        PE
                 1
                 2
                 3
              Average
184
255
349
263
(367)
(510)
(698)
(525)
182
233
257
227
                               (364)
                               (465)
                               (533)
                               (454)
232
318
303
284
(463)
(636)
(606)
(568)

-------
Ml I l_Jo



 I 14
 117
Day .if
Su rvey

1
•i
•)
Average

1
2
3
Average

1
2
3
Average

1
2
3
Average

r>
18.5
22.0
23.0
21.0
FK
401
359
279
346
CS
23.0
19.0
20.5
21.0
PaM
3.0
1.0
6.0
3.5


(37)
(44)
(A 6)
(A 2)

(HOI)
(718)
(557)
(692)

(A6)
(38)
(Al)
(A2)

(6)
(2)
(12)
(7)

C
22.0
20.5
22.0
21.5





ES
53.5
74.0
94. 0
7A.O
PL
75.5
65.5
70.0
70.5
Color

(AA)
(Al)
(AA)
(43)






(1.07)
(148)
(188)
(148)

(151)
(131)
(140)
(141)
TAHI.K 9
(Continued)
Mill Location Sampled
Load - Kilograms/Thousand Kilograms (Pounds/Ton)

64.0
72.5
58.5
65.0






13.5
31 .0
29.5
24.5

38.5
77.5
71.5
62.5
E
(128)
(1A5)
(117)
(130)





BS
(27)
(62)
(59)
(49)
PR
(77)
(155)
(143)
(125)
A
22.5
25.0
2A.O
2A.O





R6.K
3.0
0.5
1 .5
1.5
FE
147
138
160
148

(45)
(50)
(48)
(A8)






(f>)
(1)
(3)
(3)

(293)
(276)
(319)
(296)
PI
164
196
116
157





A
53.5
A5.5
A8.0
A9.0
12
-
-
0.05
0.05

(328)
(381)
(231)
(313)






(107)
(91)
(96)
(98)

-
-
(0.1)
(0.1)
SI
197 (39A)
223 (AA6)
171 (3A2)
197 (394)





11
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
13
-
-
14.0 (28)
.14.0 (28)
  Kecaust it: i zing area.


12  .
  Di guster concent:rate.



  Kvaporator  concentratt;

-------
                                                                        TAIII.K y

                                                                      (Continued)
               Day D|"
               Survey
                  3
               Avu rage
                                                                              Mill Locution Sampled
                                                             Color Load - Kilograms/Thousand Kilograms  (Pounds/Ton)
c
3(>.0
1)8.0
37.5
37.0

(72)
(76)
(75)
(74)

74
139
57
90
1?
(148)
(277)
(114)
(180)

89
94
96
93
PI
(1.78)
(188)
(192)
(186)

108
1.30
107
115
SI
(216)
(259)
(214)
(230)

1 19
163
137
140
PE
(237)
(326)
(274)
(279)

0.3
0.5
0.5
0.4
14
(0.5)
(1.0)
(J.O)
(0.8)
                  3
               Averse
                  3
               Average
                            27.0
                            28.5
                            22.0
                            26.0
 (54)
 (57)
 (44)
 (52)
                                                   29.5
                                                   31.5
                                                   28.5
                                                         IIS
                                                 30.0
          (59)
          (63)
          (57)
                                                           (60)
            .17.5
            1.8.0
            10.0
                                                                      15.0
                                                                              CH
          (35)
          (36)
          (20)
                                                                                (30)
            16.0
            17.5
            14.0
                                                                                           16.0
          (32)
          (35)
          (28)
                                                                                                      (32)
            87.5
            82.0
            67.5
                                                                                                                76.0
         (175)
         (1.64)
         (135)
                                                                                                                          (158)
            99.5
            81.5
            64.5
                                                                                                                                        82.0
                                                                                                                                              PE
         (199)
         (163)
         (129)
                                                                                                                                                 (164)
15
No. 2 lagoon influent.

No. 2 lagoon decant.
                              45.0
                              50.0
                              45.0
                                      (90)
                                     (100)
                                      (90)
                              46.5
                                        (93)
                  I
                  2
                  3
               Average
                            76.0
                            70.5
                            49.5
                            65.5
(152)
(141)
 (99)
                                     (131)
                                                         CS
39.0
38.5
31.5
                                                 36.5
 (78)
 (77)
 (63)
                                                           (73)
                                                                              ES
123.0
121 .0
 94.5
                                                                      114.5
(255)
(242)
(189)
                                                                               (229)
18.0
53.5
24.5
                                                                                           32.0
 (36)
(107)
 (49)
                                                                                                      (64)
47.5
90.5
47.0
                                                                                                                61.5
                                                                                                                        Ell
 (95)
(181)
 (94)
                                                                                                                          (123)
105
126
118
                                                                                                                                        116
(210)
(251)
(236)
                                                                                                          (232)
                  I
                  2
                  3
               Average
                            59.5
                            40.0
                            50.0
                            50.0
                                    PE
(119)
 (80)
(100)
                                     (100)
236
217
190
                                                 215
                                                         SI
(472)
(434)
(380)
                                                          (429)
268
244
284
                                                                      265
(535)
(487)
(567)
                                                                               (530)

-------
                                                                       TABLE 9

                                                                       (CunLlniiutl)
              Day of
              Sn rvc
125

1
2
3
Average

1
9
3
Average

1
2
3
4
Average

1
2
3
4
Average
1
2
3
Average

]
2
3
Average

15.0
19.0
14.5
16.0

207
254
175
212

-
7.5
8.5
3.5
6.5

238
277
313
-
276
24.0
20.5
17.5
20.5

366
335
270
324
A
(30)
(38)
(29)
(32)
SK
(414)
(509)
(350)
(424)
n
-
(15)
(17)
(7)
(13)
SI
(476)
(554)
(626)
-
(552)
(48)
(41)
(35)
(41)
SE
(732)
(669)
(539)
(647)
                                                        Al
                 Mill Location Sampled
Color Load - Kilograms/Thousand Kilograms  (Pounds/Ton)
267      (533)
132      (264)
210      (420)
                                                  203
                                                           (406)
                                                        FK
c
30.5
41.0
43.0
38.0
SE
211
206
237
218
CS
40.0
47.5
79.0
55.5
FE
405
378
347
376
(61)
(82)
(86)
(76)
(421)
(413)
(474)
(436)
(80)
(95)
(158)
(111)
(809)
(755)
(693)
(752)
                                                                        8.0
                                                                        8.0
                                                                        1 .5
                  (16)
                  (16)
                   (3)
                                                                        6.0
                                                                                 (12)
                                                                             E
                                                                         205    (4.10)
                                                                         312    (623)
                                                                         217    (434)
                                                                         245
                                                                                (489)
                                                                             KE
                                                                       255
                                                                       275
                                                                       251
                  (509)
                  (549)
                  (501)
                                                                       260
                                                                                 (520)
                                                                             ES
                                                                       505     (1,010)
                                                                       517     (1,033)
                                                                       456	(911)
                                                                       493
                                                                                 (985)
139
149
206
                                                                                             1.65
                               91
                               80
                               114
                                                                                              95
                              47.5
                              68.0
                              66.5
                              60.5
                                                                                                                        SI
(278)
(298)
(411)
                                                                                                      (329)
257      (514)
398      (796)
282	(563)
                                                                                                                  312
                                                                                                                           (624)
                                                                                                   Al
                                                                                                                                             PE
        (182)
        (160)
        (228)
              114
              209
                                                                        (228)
                                                                        (417)
                                       (190)
                                                                                                                    167
                                                                                                                          (323)
                       151    (301)
                       186    (372)
                       155    (310)
                       164    (328)
                                                                                                                        PI
                                                                                                                                             SI
          (95)
         (136)
         (133)
         (1-21)
            600    (1,199)
            243      (486)
            188      (375)
                                                                                     403       (806)
                                                                                     358       (716)
                                                                                     315	(630)
                                                                                                                  344
                                                                                                                           (687)
                                                                                                                                       359
                                                                                                                                                 (717)

-------
                                                                          TAHI.K 9

                                                                        (Con Li lined)
Mill No.
 127
l=Mill  I
2=MiI  I  2
 134
               Hay
               Su I'v
                   3
               Average
                   3
               Average
          (2)

         T2T
 7.0
 3.0
                                        (14)
                                         (ft)
                                         (7)
                                         (9)
                                     19
                                 -1.0     (2)
                                31.0    (62)
                                19.0    (38)
                                1.7.0    (3/0
                                         (4)
                                         (4)
                                         (4)
                                         (4)
                                     I'M
                               107.5    (215)
                               111.5    (223)
                                93.0    (186)
                                                    Mill  Location Sampled
                                  Color Load - Kilograms/Thousand Kilograms  (Pounds/Ton)
1 04.0
         (208)

6
12
9
9
2.1 .
34.
26.
28.
234
361
296
297
50
42
34
42
1.05.
1.26.
85,
106.
n.,s
' (12)
(24)
(18)
(18)
AS
.0 (42)
.0 (68)
.0 (52)
.0 (56)
PI
(467)
(721)
(591)
(593)
CS
(100)
(84)
(68)
(84)
PI
.5 (211)
.5 (253)
.5 (171)
.0 (212)
C S
25.5
29.0
27.0
W
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
SI
333
401
374
369
KS
145
138
158
147
PE
116.5
94.5
88.0
99.5

(51)
(58)
(54)
(2)
(3)
(2)
(2)
(665)
(802)
(747)
(738)
(290)
(276)
(315)
(294)
(233)
(189)
(176)
(199)
C..S
7.0 '
20.0
7.5
11.5
16
7.5
8.5
4.5
7.0
FT.
348
406
359
371
Cll
16
23
12
17
I'K
85.5
75.5
67.5
76.0

(14)
(40)
(1.5)
(23)
(15)
(1.7)
(!»)
(14)
(695)
(81.2)
(718)
(742)
(32)
(46)
(24)
(34)
(171)
(151)
(135)
(152)

303
276
280
286
2.0
2.5
0.4
1.5
5.5
5.5
5.0
5.5
E S
(605)
(550)
(560)
(572)
17
(4)
(5)
(0.8)
(3)
EH
(11)
(11)
(10)
(11)

105
207
152
154
4.5
6.0
3.0
4.5
4.0
1.0
1.5
E0S
' (209)
(413)
(304)
(309)
18
(9)
(12)
(6)
(9)
PaM
(8)
(2)
(3)
  No.  ') riua I box  s idu  strc;im.
17
  KIIOLS and slii ves.
1.8
  1'ower house midillt;  U-drain.
  Power house  south  U-drain.

-------
                                                                          TA11I.E 9

                                                                        (Con tinned)
               l):iy of
               Sn rvey
                  3
               Average
               Average
                   I
                   2
                   3
               Average
                Mill Location  Sampled
ilor  Load  - Kilograms/Thousand  Kilograms (Pounds/Ton
                   1
                   2
                   3
               Average
                   1
                   2
                   3
               Average
78. 5
74.5
63.5
72.0
IT
146
159
1.69
1.58
1)11
10.0
16.0
14.0
13.5
1)
107
141
107
119
115
97
153
122
Al
200
193
196
196
(157)
(149)
(127)
(1.44)
(291)
(318)
(338)
(316)
(20)
(32)
(28)
(27)
(214)
(282)
(214)
(237)
(230)
(194)
(306)
(243)
(400)
(386)
(391)
(392)

14.5
.13.5
11.5
13.0
158
152
169
160
.12.0
17.5
14.5
14.5
21.5
13.0
15.5
16.5
26.5
30.0
28.0
24.5
12.5
20.5
19.0
A
(29)
(27)
(23)
(26)
PE
(315)
(303)
(338)
(319)
CH
(24)
(35)
(29)
(29)
C
(43)
(26)
(31)
(33)
cs
(53)
(60)
(56)
" (49)
(25)
(41)
(38)
ES-A2" ES-O
54.0
69.5
67.0
63.5
FE
1.19
137
132
129
EH
19.0
28.0
22.5
23.0
E
8.1.0
66.0
71.0
72.5
ES
104.0
67.0
80.0
83.5
A
13.0
17.5
24.5
18.5
(108)
(139)
(134)
(127)
(238)
(273)
(264)
(258)
(38)
(56)
(45)
(46)
(162)
(132)
(142)
(145)
(207)
(134)
(160)
(167)
(26)
(35)
(49)
(37)
36.5
24.5
25.5
29.0
I'T
74.5
104.0
96.5
9.1.5
I'T
180
225
162
189
1)11
92
73
103
89
!'l
(73)
(49)
(51)
(58)
(149)
(208)
(193)
(183)
(360)
(450)
(324)
(378)
(184)
(146)
(205)
(178)
1111
7.5
4.5
6.0
6.0
SI
84.5
116.0
90.0
96.5
PE
157
325
137
140
CH
19.5
11.5
24.0
18.5
RiE
(15)
(9)
(12)
(12)
(169)
(231)
(180)
(193)
(313)
(249)
(274)
(279)
(39)
(23)
(48)
(37)
6.0
1.5
3.8
74.5
99.5
76.0
83.5
126
170
147
148
30.0
2.1.0
29.5
27.0
(12)
(3)
(7.5)
SE
(149)
(199)
(152)
(167)
FE
(252)
(339)
(294)
(295)
EH
(60)
(42)
(59)
(54)
?.o,.
  Caustic extract  JMltr.-ite  bleach J i nu A.

  Cause ic extract  I: i 1 crate  bleach line H.

-------
Day of
Mill No. Survey

187 1
2
3
AVCI.IKI;
1
9
3
Average


37.5
28.5
27.0
31.0
234
205
204
214

Cll
(75)
(57)
(54)
(62)
(468)
(409)
(408)
(428)


87
1 II
105
101


Co lor
KH
(174)
(222)
(210)
(202)


TABLE y
(Continued)
Mill Location Sampled
Load - Ki lo^rams/Thousand Kilograms (Pounds/Ton)
W
4.5 (9) 22.
76.
2.0 (4) 23
3.3 (6.5) 40.


R&E
.0
.5
.5
.5


(44)
(153)
(47)
(81)


101
162
189
151


PI
(201)
(324)
(378)
(301)



220
230
200
216


SI
(440)
(460)
(400)
(433)



-------
pulp production (3, 4, 5). The main reason for this suggested change was




that it would more accurately reflect the color load from a mill.




Previous studies have concluded that the pulping and bleaching processes




are responsible for the largest percentage of the color contributed to a




bleached kraft pulp and paper mill's total wastewater.  Using the bleach




plant production would eliminate inaccuracies caused at mills which




utilize large amounts of fillers, purchased pulp, and/or other types of




pulp in the manufacture of their finished product.  For these reasons




the determination of color load in kg/kkg (Ibs/ton) of production was




based on the bleach plant production. For those mills which utilize




separate bleach plants for hardwood and softwood the determination of




color load for sample locations within these separate bleach plants




utilized only the production for that bleach plant (i.e., softwood




production only is used to calculate color load in the softwood bleach




plant).  The results of the color load determinations in kilograms per




thousand kilograms (pounds per ton) for each sample location on each




day, as well as the three-day average for each sample location are shown




on Table 9.  Refer to Table 6 for the letter code identifications used




for the sample locations.









F.   BLEACHED KRAFT MILL COLOR ORIGIN









Several treatment technologies which have been proposed by researchers




for the reduction of color in bleached kraft pulp and paper mill ef-




fluents are for treatment of the first stage caustic extraction filtrate




and/or the total bleach plant process wastewater stream only.  The basis




for this was the assumption that a large portion of the color load from
                            111-66

-------
a bleached kraft mill originates in the bleach plant, and that it is




less expensive to treat these highly colored streams utilizing specific




treatment technologies.









Therefore, the percent color at the various sample locations within a




mill's process based upon the total color load at the treatment system




was determined.  This was done to determine if the percent color re-




duction, which has been claimed by the manufacturers of these tech-




nologies, would reduce the color load enough to meet the proposed BATEA




limitations.









Prior to the calculation of the percent color at sample locations within




a mill's process, it was necessary to select the total mill color load




at a location in the treatment system which would provide the most




accurate total color load from each mill for the period of the survey.




The total color load at the final effluent was eliminated because in




twenty-two of the twenty-six mills surveyed, detention times were great-




er than the 3-day survey period and therefore would not reflect any




changes in wastewater characteristics caused by process changes which




might have occurred during the survey period.  In many of the mills the




acid portion of the mill's wastewater stream bypasses the primary clar-




ifier and combines with the remainder of the mill's wastewater at the




influent to the secondary treatment system.  The time for the wastewater




to flow from its source within the individual mill processes to the




influent to the secondary treatment system was normally a relatively




short time period.  Therefore, changes within a process which would




affect the color level from the mill would normally be reflected at the
                            111-67

-------
secondary treatment system influent within a few hours.  Additionally,




selection of a sample location at the influent to the secondary treat-




ment system eliminated any possible color increases or decreases that




might occur through the secondary treatment system and any holding




lagoons which might be utilized by a mill.  It should be noted that




because of the short duration of the color surveys (3 days) at each mill




it could not be determined if any color increases due to detention time




in earthen lagoons had occurred.  For the preceding reasons the influent




to the secondary treatment system was used as the location for estab-




lishing total mill color loads and for determining the percent color at.




each sample location.









Figures 18 through 43 are block diagrams of the basic sewer system




utilized to transport wastewater to the treatment system for each mill.




The color load identified, in kilograms (pounds) per day, along with the




percent of the total color for the sample locations indicated are shown




for each of the 26 mills surveyed.









The accuracy of the color origin determinations depends upon the proper




sampling and analysis procedures in the field, as well as the method of




flow rate determination at each sample location.  The flow rate is used




in calculating the color load in kilograms (pounds) per day.  Attempts




were made to utilize the most accurate method available for determining




flow rates.  In some instances it was necessary to utilize estimates of




the flow rate as provided by mill personnel.  These estimates of flow




were often based on average mill experience or on pumping performance
                            111-68

-------
                                            FIGURE  18
       COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (4*/DAY)t  AND %
                                       MILL  NUMBER  IOO
                                                                   OF  TOTAL COLOR
              PULP MILL

               38,490
              (84,780)
                 22%
             SCREEN ROOM
                 OR
               DECKER
            BLEACH PLANT
          Acid
                    Caustic
                     2,688
                    (5,920)
                      2%
              PAPER MILL
1

 llogram per day units appear
above English units.
                                                                             WOODYARD
                                                                            CAUSTICIZING
                                                                        RECOVERY & EVAPORATOR
 PRIMARY
TREATMENT
  131,551
 (289,760)
   77%
                                                     ACID SEWER
                                                       28,870
                                                      (63,590)
                                                        17%
                                                                             CHEMICAL AREA
TOTAL COLOR
     @
SECONDARY
 INFLUENT
  171,840
 (378,500)
                                                                           ASH POND  AND  SLUDGE
                                                                              LAGOON DECANT
 1,998
(4,400)
   1%
                                       111-69

-------
                                             FIGURE   19
        COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (*t/DAY),* AND %  OF  TOTAL COLOR
                                        MILL  NUMBER IOI
               PULP MILL
                 60,780
               (133,880)
                   48%
                  -»T*
               SCREEN ROOM
                  OR
                DECKER
             BLEACH PLANT
         1st Cl2
          11,310
         (24,920)
             9%
1st Caustic
  71,840
(158,240)
     56%
             PAPER MACHINES
                  AND
               PULP DRYER
 I
                                                                               WOODYARD
  Jilogram per day  units  appear
  above English units.
*=Hrimary Influent  plus Acid
 Wewer.
                 PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                 102,700
                (226,210)
                    80%
                                                                              EVAPORATORS
                                        ACID  SEWER
                                          25,120
                                         (55,320)
                                           20%
                    CHEMICAL AREA,
                    LIME KILN,  AND
                       RECOVERY
                         1,150
                        (2,530)
                           1%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT**
    127,810
   (281,530)
                                        111-70

-------
                                           FIGURE   20
     COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (4t/DAY),* AND %  OF TOTAL COLOR
                                     MILL  NUMBER IO2
            DIGESTERS
              DECKER
              6,120
            (13,470)
               8%
           BLEACH PLANT
              61,000
            (134,370)
                81%
            PAPER MILL
 *Kilograms per day units
  appear above English units.
**Secondary Influent was
  assumed to be primary
  effluent, bleach plant,
  and woodyard.
  _S\_
                                            WOODYARD
                                               640
                                            (1,400)
                                               1%
                                          RECOVERY AND
                                          CAUSTICIZING
 PRIMARY
TREATMENT
   13,370
  (29,440)
     18%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
 INFLUENT**
    75,010
  (165,210)
                                     111-71

-------
                                           FIGURE   21
     COLOR SOURCES,  LOAD (#/DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL  COLOR
                                      MILL  NUMBER  IO3
            DIGESTERS
              DECKER
              31,630
             (69,660)
                42%
           BLEACH PLANT
         Acid
        28,200
       (62,110)
          38%
Caustic
            PAPER MILL
               460
            (1,020)
               1%
*Kilogram per day units
 appear above English units.
^Secondary Influent was  the
 sum of the Primary Effluent
 plus the Bleach Plant Sewer,
                                    _S\_
                PRIMARY
               TREATMENT
                 26,500
                (58,400)
                  35%
                                                                              WOODYARD
                                                           RECOVERY &
                                                           EVAPORATOR
                                                             14,690
                                                             (32,360)
                                                               20%
                                                                            PULP DRYER
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
 INFLUENT**
    74,990
  (165,170)
                                      111-72

-------
                                           FIGURE   22
     COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (#/ DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL  COLOR
                                     MILL  NUMBER  IO5
            DIGESTERS &
             WASHERS
             DECKER
      Softwood
        5,620
      (12,370)
         2%
Hardwood
  8,540
(18,820)
   4%
          BLEACH PLANTS
              1st C12
      Softwood
        8,560
      (18,850)
         4%
Hardwood
  4,390
 (9,680)
   2%
          BLEACH PLANTS
           1st Caustic
      Softwood
        95,280
      (209,860)
         41%
Hardwood
  2,900
 (6,380)
   1%
                                                            WOODYARD
                                                              5,970
                                                            (13,160)
                                                               3%
Kilogram per day units
appear above English units,
                 PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                 153,260
                (337,570)
                   67%
                                                                        RECOVERY & EVAPORATOR
                                                                             PAPER MILL
                                    ACID SEWER
                                      95,830
                                    (211,080)
                                       42%
TOTAL COLOR @
 SECONDARY
  INFLUENT
   230,110
  (506,850)
                                      111-73

-------
                                          FIGURE   23
     COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (4*/DAY),* AND %  OF TOTAL COLOR
                                     MILL  NUMBER  IO6
             DIGESTERS
             DECKER
             30,120
            (66,340)
              24%
           BLEACH PLANT
      1st Cl2
       16,730
      (36,860)
        13%
1st Caustic
  70,020
(154,220)
   55%
           PAPER MILL &
           PULP DRYER
Kilogram per day units
appear above English units.
                                                           WOODYARD
                                                           EVAPORATORS
                   CAUSTICIZING &
                    LIME RECOVERY
                               CAUSTIC  SEWER
                                   78,470
                                 (172,850)
                                    62%
                                                ACID  SEWER
                                                   11,760
                                                  (25,910)
                                                    9%
                     POWER HOUSE
                 PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                   53,710
                 (118,310)
                    42%
                                                 i'
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
 INFLUENT	
   127,360
  (280,520)
                                     111-74

-------
                                              FIGURE   24-
        COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (#/DAY),*AND % OF TOTAL COLOR
                                        MILL  NUMBER  IO7
               DIGESTER
                DECKER
                12,830
               (28,270)
                 31%
             BLEACH PLANT
        1st Cl2**
          7,450
        (16,420)
1st Caustic**
    71,360
  .(157,180)
               PAPER MILL
 ^Kilogram per day units       ]
   appear above English units.
   §A portion of the 1st stage
   Cl2 and caustic filtrates are
   sent to odor abatement
   facilities.
*B:Secondary influent was
 • assumed to be effluent from
   ASB#1 (Detention Time 1.4
   days).
                                                                                WOQDYARD
                                                                            (Purchased Chips)
                                                             RECOVERY
CAUSTIC SEWER
  21,310
 (46,930)
    52%
                           ACID SEWER
                             6,770
                           (14,910)
                              16%
                  PRIMARY
                 TREATMENT
             TOTAL COLOR @
               SECONDARY
             INFLUENT***
                 41,060
                (90,450)
                                         111-75

-------
                                          FIGURE  25
     COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (^/DAY),*AND % OF  TOTAL  COLOR
                                     MILL  NUMBER  IO8
      DIGESTER & WASHING
           SCREEN ROOM
           BLEACH PLANT
             121,760
            (268,190)
               30%
            PULP DRYER
*Kilogram per day units
 appear above English unit.
                                           WOODYARD
                                       EVAPORATOR & RECOVERY
            STRONG LIQUOR LAGOON
                  71,260
                (156,970)
                   18%
                    CAUSTICIZING &
                     LIME RECOVERY
                                               3-3
 PRIMARY
TREATMENT
  106,820
 (235,280)
    26%
                                                                           CHEMICAL AREA
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
  403,400
 (888,550)
                                      111-76

-------
                                            FIGURE   26
       COLOR SOURCES,  LOAD (4t/DAY),*AND % OF TOTAL COLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER  MO
             PULP MILL
               DECKER
                5,230
              (11,520)
                4%
            BLEACH PLANT
       1st C12
        13,480
       (29,700)
          11%
1st Caustic
   80,590
 (177,500)
    64%
             PAPER MILL
                                                                        EVAPORATORS & RECOVERY
                                                         CAUSTICIZING &
                                                              LIME
kilogram per day units
 appear above English units.
                PRIMARY
               TREATMENT
                124,590
               (274,430)
                  98%
COLOR TOTAL @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
  126,740
 (279,170)
                                        111-77

-------
                                           FIGURE   27
      COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD  (#/DAY),*AND %  OF  TOTAL COLOR
                                      MILL  NUMBER III
            PULP MILL
        Softwood
Hardwood
           BLEACH PLANT
             1st Cl?
        Softwood
          1,370
         (3,010)
            1%
Hardwood
    990
 (2,170)
    1%
           BLEACH PLANT
           1st Caustic
        Softwood
          31,830
         (70,100)
            26%
Hardwood
 12,630
(27,820)
   10%
            PAPER MILL
                                                                             RECOVERY
^Kilogram per day units
 appear above English units.
                PRIMARY
               TREATMENT
                 129,880
                (286,080)
                  106%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
   122,890
  (270,690)
                                       111-78

-------
                                           FIGURE  28
      COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (#/DAY),*AND %  OF TOTAL COLOR
                                      MILL  NUMBER  113
              DECKER
        Softwood
         14,920
        (32,870)
            7%
 Hardwood
  49,330
(108,660)
    24%
           BLEACH PLANT
              1st C12
        Softwood
         13,870
        (30,550)
           7%
 Hardwood
   2,820
  (6,220)
     1%
           BLEACH PLANT
      1st Caustic
        Softwood
         30,940
        (68,140)
           15%
  1st  Hypo
 Hardwood
   1,650
  (3,640)
    1%
            PAPER MILL
                AND
            PULP DRYER
                                                                             WOODYARD
                                                            DIGESTER
                       RECOVERY
                         AND
                    CAUSTICIZING
*Kilogram per day appear
 above English units.
               PRIMARY
              TREATMENT
               242,050
               (533,140)
                  115%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
    209,030
   (460,420)
                                       111-79

-------
                                          FIGURE  29
     COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (#/DAY),*AND  % OF  TOTAL  COLOR
                                     MILL  NUMBER  114-
             PULP MILL
             DECKER
             14,940
             (32,900)
               11%
          BLEACH PLANT
     1st Cl?
      15,050
     (33,150)
       11%
1st Caustic
   45,340
  (99,860)
     33%
                                                                            RECOVERY
*Kilogram per day units
 appear above English units.
               PRIMARY
              TREATMENT
               109,120
              (240,350)
                 79%
                                                          CAUSTICIZING
                                                               AND
                                                              LIME
                                                    ACID  SEWER
                                                      16,650
                                                     (36,670)
                                                        12%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
  INFLUENT
   137,360
  (302,550)
                                      111-80

-------
                                              FIGURE  3O
        COLOR  SOURCES,  LOAD (#/ DAY),* AND  % OF  TOTAL COLOR
                                         MILL  NUMBER  117
                DIGESTERS,
          WASHERS.  AND  SCREENS
             BLEACH PLANT
          1st Cl?
           6,440
          (14,190)
            18%
1st Caustic**
   22,730
  (50,070)
     66%
               PULP DRYER
               PAPER MILL
                 1,050
                (2,310)
                  3%
                                                           EVAPORATORS AND
                                                               RECOVERY
                                                                 530
                                                              (1,170)
                                                                 2%
BLEACH FILTRATES
     7,590
   (16,710)
      22%
RECAUSTICIZING AND
    LIME RECOVERY

    Negligible
 'wLlogram per day units appear
  above English units.
**"ypochlorite is added to the
  tustic filtrate being
  Sewered for color reduction.
**S_econdary influent was the sum
     the Primary Effluent and
   .d Sewer.
                  PRIMARY
                 TREATMENT
                  21,650
                  (47,690)
                     63%
                                                       ACID  SEWER
                                                          15,010
                                                         (33,060)
                                                           44%
                    TOTAL COLOR @
                      SECONDARY
                     INFLUENT***
                       34,200
                      (75,330)
                                          111-81

-------
                                            FIGURE  31
       COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD  (4*/DAY),  AND %  OF  TOTAL  COLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER IIS
              PULP MILL
                   540
                 (1,180)
                  3%
               DECKER
            BLEACH PLANT
        1st Cl?
          5,580
        (12,280)
           32%
                   1st Caustic
                     12,590
                    (27,740)
                       72%
              PAPER MILL
                                                                              WOODYARD
                                                                              RECOVERY
I
 ilogram per day units appear
above English units.
 econdary Influent was the sum
 f the Primary Effluent and
No. 2 Lagoon Decant.
 PRIMARY
TREATMENT
  13,950
 (30,720)
    82%
TOTAL COLOR@
 SECONDARY
INFLUENT**
  17,480
 (38,510)
                                        111-82

-------
                                            FIGURE  32
       COLOR SOURCES, LOAD (#/ DAY),* AND %  OF  TOTAL CQLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER  119
           BATCH DIGESTERS
            BLEACH PLANT
               1st Cl2
         Softwood
           5,250
         (11,560)
           13%
Hardwood
   4,240
  (9,350)
    11%
            BLEACH PLANT
              1st Hypo
         Softwood
           6,010
         (13,240)
           15%
Hardwood
  4,440
 (9,780)
  11%
               PAPER MILL
I
                                                                           CIO2 GENERATING
                                                                               PLANT
                                                         CAUSTICIZING
                                                             AREA
ilogram per day units appear
     English units.
                PRIMARY
               TREATMENT
                38,040
               (83,790)
                  97%
TOTAL COLOR @
 SECONDARY
  INFLUENT
  39,400
 (86,790)
                                        111-83

-------
                                            FIGURE ^33
       COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD  (#/DAY),*AND %  OF  TOTAL COLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER 121
              PULP MILL
             SCREEN ROOM
                72,990
              (160,780)
                 31%
            BLEACH PLANTS
               1st Cl2
         Softwood
          22,740
         (50,090)
            9%
Hardwood
 15,820
(34,840)
   7%
             BLEACH PLANTS
              1st Caustic
         Softwood
           71,700
        (157,930)
           30%
Hardwood
  30,390
 (66,930)
     13%
kilogram per day units  appear
 above English units.
                                                          PAPER MILL
                                                           RECOVERY
BLEACH PLANT
  129,190
 (284,570)
    54%
                 PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                  55,090
                (121,340)
                   23%
        TOTAL  COLOR
          SECONDARY
          INFLUENT
          238,810
         (526,010)
                                        111-84

-------
                                            FIGURE  34
       COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (4t/DAY),*AND  % OF  TOTAL  COLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER  122
              PULP MILL
            BLEACH PLANT
         Acid
          9,670
        (21,290)
           5%
 Caustic
 122,370
(269,530)
   66%
               PAPER MILL
kilogram per day units  appear
 above English units.
               PRIMARY
              TREATMENT
                97,020
              (213,710)
                 52%
                                                          WOODWASH
                       EVAPORATOR
                         3,670
                        (8,080)
                          2%
                                                                             CAUSTICIZING
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
  186,190
 (410,120)
                                        111-85

-------
                                             FIGURE  35
        COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (4t/DAY),*AND % OF  TOTAL  COLOR
                                        MILL  NUMBER  125
             DIGESTERS AND
                WASHING
             BLEACH PLANT
         1st Cl?
          33,180
         (73,080)
           14%
1st Caustic
 213,300
(469,820)
    87%
               WOODYARD
                139,420
               (307,090)
                  54%
*wLlogram per day units  appear
 above English units.
                                                         CAUSTICIZING
                                                                               PAPER MILL
                                ALKALINE SEWER
                                    83,920
                                  (184,840)
                                     34%
                      SCREEN ROOM
                 PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                 142,230
                (313,280)
                   58%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
   244,110
  (537,690)
                                          111-86

-------
                                            FIGURE  36
       COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD  (#/DAY),*AND %  OF  TOTAL COLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER 126
              PULP MILL
               DECKER
                9,420
              (20,750)
                 6%
            BLEACH PLANT
        1st Cl
         25,63(
        (56,460)
          16%
                 1st Caustic
                  225,170
                 (495,980)
                   138%
I
Kilogram per day units
appear above English units.
                                                                            WOODYARD
                                                                            RECOVERY
                                                  ACID SEWER
                                                    28,030
                                                   (61,740)
                                                      17%
                                     PRIMARY
                                    TREATMENT
                                     152,440
                                    (335,770)
                                       93%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
   163,310
  (359,710)
                                         111-87

-------
                                            FIGURE  37
       COLOR SOURCES,  LOAD (4*/DAY),* AND  % OF TOTAL COLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER  127
             PULP MILL
                 2%
               DECKER
        Mill #1
        Negligible
Mill n
    1%
            BLEACH PLANT
              1st Cl?
        Mill #1
Mill 92
  1%
             BLEACH PLANT
              1st  Caustic
        Mill  #1
        39%
   Mill 92
     20%
«ill requested color  load
 (///day)  be kept confidential.
                                                          WOODYARD
                                                         Negligible
                                                         CAUSTICIZING
                                                                             EVAPORATOR
                                                                                  1%
                                                   ACID SEWER
                                                      7%
                PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                   80%
                                                           POWER HOUSE
                            6%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
                                         111-88

-------
                                           FIGURE   38
      COLOR SOURCES,  LOAD (#/DAY),*AND  % OF TOTAL  COLOR
                                      MILL  NUMBER  134-
          SCREEN ROOM
            1,160
           (2,560)
             2%
                   *r*-
           BLEACH PLANT
              1st Cl2
       Softwood
         8,650
       (19,060)
          15%
Hardwood
  6,480
(14,280)
   11%
          BLEACH PLANT
          1st Caustic
       Softwood
         30,720
        (67,660)
           52%
Hardwood
  2,070
 (4,550)
    4%
             PAPER MILL
               1,490
              (3,290)
                3%
^Kilogram per day units
 appear above English units.
                                                            RECOVERY
                 PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                  62,860
                (138,450)
                   107%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
   INFLUENT
      59,010
    (129,970)
                                       111-89

-------
                                             FIGURE   39
       COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (#/DAY),*AND % OF TOTAL COLOR
                                       MILL  NUMBER  136
          DECKER FILTRATES
           COLLECTION TANK
               91,140
              (200,740)
                45%
            BLEACH PLANTS
          1st Cl2 Collection
          	Tank	
              16,670
             (36,720)
               8%
            BLEACH PLANTS
            1st Caustic
        A-Pine
         48,170
       (106,100)
          24%
                 C-Pine
                  21,860
                 (48,160)
                    11%
             BLEACH PLANT
           1st Hypochlorite
                 3,030
                (6,680)
                  2%
I
ilogram per day units
ppear above English units.
                                                                           EVAPORATORS AND
                                                                             RECOVERY
                                                                              4,930
                                                                            (10,860)
                                                                                2%
                                                                            PAPER MILL
                                  PRIMARY
                                 TREATMENT
                                  199,460
                                 (439,330)
                                    99%
                                                         TOTAL COLOR @
                                                           SECONDARY
                                                            INFLUENT
                                                           201,270
                                                          (443,330)
                                         111-90

-------
                                           FIGURE  40
      COLOR SOURCES,  LOAD (4t/DAY),*AND % OF TOTAL COLOR
                                      MILL  NUMBER  I4O
          SCREEN ROOM AND
              DECKER
              4,180
             (9,210)
               14%
           BLEACH PLANT
       1st Cl?
        4,590
      (10,110)
          15%
1st Caustic
  7,290
(16,050)
     24%
           PULP  CLEANERS
          AND PULP MACHINE
                                                           EVAPORATORS
''Kilogram per day units appear
 above  English units.
                PRIMARY
               TREATMENT
                 28,760
                (63,350)
                   95%
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
  INFLUENT
   30,300
  (66,740)
                                       111-91

-------
                                     FIGURE  4-1
COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (4*/DAY),*AND % OF  TOTAL  COLOR
                                MILL  NUMBER  152
       SCREEN ROOM
        DECKER
        30,450
        (67,070)
          63%
     BLEACH PLANT
 1st Cl2
  4,530
 (9,970)
   9%
1st Caustic
  19,340
 (42,600)
     40%
        PAPER MILL
^ilgoram per day units  appear
 above English units.
  trimary influent was used  to
  alculate the percent color of
  rocess sample locations
 because flow was recorder  at
Bhat location.
                            PRIMARY
                          TREATMENT**
                            48,660
                          (107,180)
                                       TOTAL  COLOR @
                                         SECONDARY
                                         INFLUENT
                                  111-92

-------
                                             FIGURE   42
       COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (4*/DAY),* AND % OF TOTAL  CQLOR
                                        MILL  NUMBER  161
               DIGESTERS
               DECKERS
          Softwood
           45,260
          (99,700)
             24%
Hardwood
 39,880
(87,850)
   21%
            BLEACH PLANTS
                1st C12
          Softwood
            11,310
           (24,910)
               6%
Hardwood
    8,190
  (18,040)
      4%
             BLEACH PLANTS
              1st Caustic
          Softwood
            30,140
           (66,390)
             16%
Hardwood
 12,040
(26,510)
     6%
kilogram per day units
 Appear above English units.
  icondary Influent.
                                                          EVAPORATORS
ALKALINE SEWER
   15,300
  (33,710)
     8%
                                                                               PAPER MILL
              INFLUENT TO
           PRIMARY CLARIFIER
                175,240
                (386,000)
                  92%
                             111-93
                                                        CAUSTICIZING
                                                         CHEMICAL AREA
          INFLUENT TO
           POND //4
            15,330
           (33,760)
               8%
                           190,570**
                          (419,760)

-------
                                           FIGURE   43
     COLOR  SOURCES, LOAD (4t/DAY)f* AND %  OF TOTAL COLOR
                                     MILL  NUMBER  187
        DIGESTER AND SCREEN
               AREA
           BLEACH PLANT
       1st  Cl?
        21,470
       (47,890)
         14%
1st Caustic
   71,610
 (157,730)
    47%
          PULP MACHINE
                                                            WOODYARD
                                                             2,160
                                                            (4,760)
                                                               1%
                    RECOVERY AND
                    EVAPORATOR
                       29,200
                       (64,320)
                         19%
Kilogram per day units
appear above English units.
                 PRIMARY
                TREATMENT
                 107,540
                (236,870)
                   70%
                                                                           CAUSTIC PLANT
TOTAL COLOR @
  SECONDARY
  INFLUENT .
   152,850
  (336,680)
                                          111-94

-------
data.  Table 8, showing the color load determination in thousand kilo-




grams (pounds) per day, lists each sample location with a footnote




signifying the method of flow determination used during the color sur-




vey.  Each sample location's flow rate was determined through one of the




four methods indicated:









     1.   flow was continuously recorded using mill flow recorders,









     2.   flow was measured at a parshall flume by the sampling team




          when each sample was taken and the daily flow rate was cal-




          culated,









     3.   mill personnel provided estimated flow rates, and/or









     4.   mill personnel provided calculated flow rate based on pro-




          duction levels or measurements by the mill personnel.









Most of the mill surveys required at least two of the four methods of




flow rate determination.  Many of the estimated flow rates were at




sample locations in the bleach plant or pulping area.  Therefore, the




accuracy of the color load and the color origin determinations shown on




Figures 18 through 43, for each sample location, will depend upon the




exact method used to determine the flow rate at the location.  However,




despite the possible inaccuracies introduced by estimated flows, the




determination of color origin does provide a general indication of the




sources of color within a mill.






                             111-95

-------
The first analysis performed utilizing the color origin determination




was to evaluate the total percent color level identified by source at




each mill. Figures 18 through 43 provide the sample locations used




during^the color survey, as well as those areas in the mill that were




not sampled but do discharge to the wastewater treatment system.  Table




10 summarizes the total color load at the secondary treatment influent,




the cumulative color load identified by source, and the percent of the




total color load that these identified sources represent for each mill




surveyed.









Seven of the 26 mills had 90 to 110 percent of the total color iden-




tified by source, while 12 of the 26 mills had 80 to 120 percent.




Twenty of the 26 mills were in a range from 70 to 125 percent of the




total color identified by source.  The remaining six mills were in a




range from 38 to 56 percent.  Mills, which have greater than 100 percent




of the color accounted for, resulted because estimated sewer flows had




to be used on many of the process sewers.  The accuracy of the estimates




varied and a precise calculation of the actual color load at the sample




location was not possible.









When the possible inaccuracies which arise from estimated flows are




taken into account, the percent of the total color identified by source




was concluded to have been generally good, except for the six mills




mentioned above (mills 100, 111, 113, 114, 119, and 140).









The second analysis performed was to determine the major sources of




color from the twenty-six mills.  The color data from the 20 mills which




were in the range of 70 to 125 percent of the color load identified by




source, indicated that the major source of color is the bleach plant.




                            111-96

-------
                TABLE 10




PERCENT OF TOTAL COLOR IDENTIFIED BY SOURCE
Mill
Number
100
101
102
103
105
106
107
108
110
111
113
114
117
118
119
121
122
125
126
127
134
136
140
152
161
187
Total Color @
Secondary Treatment Influent
kg/day (Ib/day) '
171,840
127,810
75,010
74,990
230,110
127,360
41,060
403,400
126,740
122,890
209,030
137,360
34,200
17,480
39,400
238,810
186,190
244,110
163,310
-
59,010
201,270
30,300
48,660
190,570
152,850
(378,500)
(281,530)
(165,210)
(165,170)
(506,850)
(280,520)
( 90,450)
(888,550)
(279,170)
(270,690)
(460,420)
(302,550)
( 75,330)
( 38,510)
( 86,790)
(526,010)
(410,120)
(537,690)
(359,710)
-
(129,970)
(443,330)
( 66,740)
(107,180)
(419,760)
(336,680)
Color Load Percent of
Identified By Source Total Color
kg /day (Ib/day)
72,050
157,740
67,750
74,980
214,140
120,360
40,910
299,840
99,300
46,810
113,540
76,920
24,180
18,700
19,940
184,280
135,700
175,410
180,470
-
50,580
185,800
16,060
54,320
157,960
124,710
(158,690)
(347,440)
(149,240)
(165,150)
(471,670)
(265,100)
( 90,110) '
(660,440)
(218,720)
(103,100)
(250,080)
(169,430)
( 53,250)
( 41,200)
( 43,930)
(405,910)
(298,900)
(386,360)
(397,510)
-
(111,400)
(409,260)
( 35,370)
(119,640)
(347,920)
(274,700)
42
124
90
100
93
95
100
74
78
38
54
56
71
107
51
77
73
72
111
77
86
92
53
112
83
82
                 111-97

-------
Fourteen of these 20 mills had at least 50 percent of their total color




load at the secondary treatment influent contributed by the bleaching




process.  The average for these 14 mills was 76 percent.  The other six




mills were in a range from 30 to 49 percent of the total color to the




wastewater treatment system contributed by the bleaching process.  The




average for these six mills was 40 percent.









The six mills which had less than 70 percent of their total color iden-




tified by source had an average color contribution from their bleaching




process of approximately 36 percent.  The average color contribution




from the bleaching process for all 26 mills was 59 percent.  Approx-




imately 45 percent was contributed by the first stage caustic extract




filtrate from the bleaching process.









The second largest color source identified at the 26 mills was the




screen room or decker filtrate.  Sixteen mills were sampled at this




process location.  The average percent of the total color load con-




tributed by the screen room or decker filtrate at these 16 mills was
approximately \24\percent.  Mill 152 (soda mill) had 63 percent of its




total color load contributed by the decker filtrate.  Mills 103, 107,




113, 121, 136, and 161 had 42, 3,1, 31, 31, 45, and 45 percent of their




total color load contributed by the screen room or decker filtrate,




respectively.









The pulping, bleaching, and evaporator and recovery processes were




responsible for an average of approximately 79 percent of the total




color load at the 26 mills surveyed.  Eighteen of the 26 mills surveyed
                              111-98

-------
had 70 percent or more of their total color load contributed by these




processes with an average of approximately 90 percent.









The preceding evaluations are utilized in Sections V and VI to provide a




basis for selection of a BATEA color control technology, and to es-




tablish updated BATEA effluent color limitations.









G.   DATA COMPARISON BY SUBCATEGORY AND WOOD SPECIE









The 26 mills surveyed were separated into their respective subcategories




to determine if a correlation existed between mill subcategory (product




manufactured) and the resulting color load to the mill's wastewater




treatment system.  The color load at the influent to the secondary




treatment system based upon the bleach plant production was used to make




the comparison.  Also included in each comparison was the proportion of




softwood used during the color survey, the bleaching sequence, and the




flow in kiloliters per thousand kilograms, kl/kkg (thousands of gallons




per ton, kgal/ton) of bleach plant production.  An average color load




and flow per ton of bleach plant production was also calculated for each




subcategory.









1.   Fine Kraft Subcategory









Four bleached kraft mills in the fine kraft subcategory were visited




during the color survey project.  Three of the mills were located in the




Northeastern section of the United States and one in the South.
                              111-99

-------
The proportion of softwood pulp bleached at these four mills ranged from




25 to 60 percent of their total bleached pulp.  The average color load




ranged from a high at Mill 136 of 159.5 kg/kkg (319 Ibs/ton) to a low of




82 kg/kkg (164 Ibs/ton) at Mill 119.  The average color load for the




four mills was 114 kg/kkg (228 Ibs/ton).









Table 11 shows the results of the comparison for the four mills in the




fine kraft subcategory.
                               TABLE 11




      COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT - FINE KRAFT
Mill
No.
118
119
134
136
Day of Percent
Survey Softwood
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
25
25
25
25
42
42
42
42
34
37
34
35
58
61
61
60
Color Load
kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
108.0
129.5
107.0
115.0
99.5
81.5
64.5
82.0
116.5
94.5
88.0
99.5
157.5
151.5
169.0
159.5
(216)
(259)
(214)
(230)
(199)
(163)
(129)
(164)
(233)
(189)
(176)
(199)
(315)
(303)
(338)
(319)
Bleaching Flow
Sequence kl/kkg (kgal/ton)
CEHD 112.6 (27.0)
122.2 (29.3)
99.7 (23.9)
111.5
CH H D 88.0
L l 92.6
93.4
91.3
CEDE-^ 157.6
CEH— ' 145.1
129.3
144.0
CEHED 148.5
CEHDH 150.1
CHEHD 155.0
151.2
(26.7)
(21.1)
(22.2)
(22.4)
(22.2)
(37.8)
(34.8)
(31.0)
(34.5)
(35.6)
(36.0)
(37.2)
(36.3)
Subcategory Average
114.0
(228)
125.0
(29.9)
The wood specie bleached and bleaching sequence appeared to have played




a role in the amount of color resulting at the secondary influent for







                              III-100

-------
the fine kraft subcategory mills.  Mill 136 had the highest color load




at the secondary treatment influent, and also the highest percentage of




softwood pulp bleached.  Mill 119 had the lowest color load, but it did




not have the lowest percentage of softwood pulp bleached.  However, it




should be noted that the bleaching sequence at Mill 119 was CH H_D.




The hypochlorite second stage of this bleaching sequence results in a




lower color level over those experienced at the other three mills in the




fine kraft subcategory, which utilize caustic for lignin extraction in




the second bleaching stage.  The hypochlorite is known for its color




reduction capabilities, and some of the mills surveyed were utilizing




hypochlorite second stage bleaching for this purpose.  Mill 117 used a




CEHH bleaching sequence; however, hypochlorite was added to the sewered




caustic extraction filtrate, for the purpose of color reduction (5a).









2.   Fine and Market Kraft Mills









Five bleached kraft mills producing fine paper and market pulp were




surveyed.  Three of the mills were located in the South, one in the Mid-




west, and one on the West Coast.









The average amount of softwood pulp bleached during the color survey at




the five mills ranged from 30 to 100 percent of the total, while the




average color load ranged from 176 to 320 kg/kkg (352 to 640 Ibs/ton)  of




bleach plant production.  The average color load for the fine and market




kraft mills surveyed was 235 kg/kkg (470 Ibs/ton).   Table 12 shows the




comparison for the five bleached kraft fine and market kraft mills which
                              III-101

-------
were surveyed.
                               TABLE 12

              COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT-
                         FINE AND MARKET KRAFT
Mill   Day of   Percent
No.    Survey   Softwood
                        Color Load
                    kg/kkg   (Ibs/ton)
101
103
106
107
110
   1
   2
   3
Average

   1
   2
   3
Average

   1
   2
   3
Average

   1
   2
   3
Average

   1
   2
   3
Average
 11
  3
 65_
 40

  0
 68
 12
 31

 41
100
 39
 60

100
100
100
100

 17
 79
 _0
 30
180.0
152.0
235.5
189.0
138,
172.
Average
217.5
176.0

289.5
359.5
310.5
320.0
305.0
230.5
310.5
282.0

139.5
304.5
181.5
208.5

235.0
(360)
(304)
(471)
(378)

(277)
(344)
(435)
(352)

(579)
(719)
(621)
(640)

(610)
(461)
(621)
(564)

(279)
(609)
(363)
(417)

(470)
Bleaching
Sequence

CEHDH
                                                Flow
                                          kl/kkg    (kgal/ton)
CEHED
CEDED
CEDHD
CEDED
125.5
152.2
135.5
137.7

130.9
128.0
162.2
140.4

274.0
254.8
265.2
264.7

279.4
281.1
341.1
300.5

164.3
205.6
174.3
181.4
                                                     205.6
(30.1)
(36.5)
(32.5)
(33.0)

(31.4)
(30.7)
(38.9)
(33.7)

(65.7)
(61.1)
(63.6)
(63.5)

(67.0)
(67.4)
(81.8)
(72.1)

(39.4)
(49.3)
(41.8)
(43.5)

(49.2)
All five mills utilized a chlorination first stage and a  caustic  extrac-

tion second stage in their bleaching sequence.  Mills 106 and  107  had

the highest color loads at 320 and 232 kg/kkg  (640 and 564 Ibs/ton),

respectively.  These two mills also bleached a higher percentage  of

softwood pulp than Mills 101, 103, and 110.  Mill 106 bleached  60  percent
                             III-102

-------
softwood while Mill 107 bleached 100 percent softwood pulp during the




color survey.









3.   Market Kraft Subcategory









Four market kraft mills were surveyed, three in the South and one in the




Midwest.  All four mills bleached pulp with a chlorination and caustic




extract as the first two stages of their bleaching sequences.  There was




a considerable range in the color load at the secondary treatment in-




fluent at these four mills.  Mill 140, located in the Midwest, had the




lowest average color load at 96.5 kg/kkg (193 Ibs/ton), while Mill 126




had the highest average color load, 358.5 kg/kkg (717 Ibs/ton).  Mill




114 and 187 had average color loads of 197 and 216.5 kg/kkg (394 and 433




Ibs/ton), respectively.  The average color load for the four market




kraft mills was 217 kg/kkg (434 Ibs/ton).









Mill 126, which had the highest color load, was the only market kraft




mill surveyed that bleached 100 percent softwood pulp.  Twenty-five




percent softwood was bleached 'at Mill 114, while Mills 140 and 187




bleached 100 percent hardwood.









Table 13 shows the comparison for the four market kraft mills surveyed.
                              III-103

-------
                               TABLE 13

            COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT
                             MARKET KRAFT
Mill
No.
114



126



140



187



Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
Percent
Softwood
25
26
24
25
100
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Color
kg/kkg
197.0
223.0
171.0
197.0
403.0
358.0
315.0
358.5
84.5
115.5
90.0
96.5
220.0
230.0
200.0
216.5
Load
(Ibs/ton)
(394)
(446)
(342)
(394)
(806)
(716)
(630)
(717)
(169)
(231)
(180)
(193)
(440)
(460)
(400)
(433)
Bleaching
Sequence kl/kkg
CEHDED 189.3
184.2
168.9
180.8
CEDED 153.0
144.3
130.1
142.6
CEHED 71.3
85.1
70.9
75.8
CEDED 109.3
99.2
98.0
102.2
Flow
_ (kgal/ton)
(45.4)
(44.2)
(40.5)
(43.4)
(36.7)
(34.6)
(31.2)
(34.2)
(17.1)
(20.4)
(17.0)
(18.2)
(26.2)
(23.8)
(23.5)
(24.5)
Subcategory Average
217.0
(434)
125.8
(30.1)
4.   BCT Kraft Subcategory



Five BCT kraft mills were surveyed, four in the South and one in the

West.  The four Southern mills had average color loads in a range from

214.5 kg/kkg (429 Ibs/ton) to 291.5 kg/kkg (583 Ibs/ton).  Mill 117,

located in the West, had an average color load of 111.5 kg/kkg (223

Ibs/ton) of bleach plant production.  It should be noted once again

however, that Mill 117 added hypochlorite to their second bleaching

stage caustic extraction filtrate that was being sewered for the purpose

of reducing the color load from this wastewater stream.  The average
                              III-104

-------
color load for the five BCT kraft mills was 221 kg/kkg  (442  Ibs/ton).



Mill 121 utilized a CHED bleaching sequence, while the  other  four mills

used CEH as their first three bleaching stages.  The  comparison  of  the

five BCT kraft mills is shown on Table 14.



                               TABLE 14

      COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT - BCT  KRAFT
Mill   Day of   Percent
No.    Survey   Softwood

105       1        52
          2        54
          3        _53
       Average     53

111       1        54
          2        61
          3        J76
       Average     63

117       1       100
          2       100
          3       100
       Average    100

121       1        57
          2        58
          3        52!
       Average     56

161       1        41
          2        46
          3        4£
       Average     45

Subcategory Average
    Color Load
kg/kkg   (Ibs/ton)
324.5
220.0
329.5
291.5

279.5
235.0
246.0
253.5

 92.0
123.0
119.5
111.5
221.0
(649)
(440)
(659)
(583)

(559)
(470)
(492)
(507)

(184)
(246)
(239)
(223)

(472)
(434)
(380)
(429)

(475)
(446)
(481)
(467)

(442)
Bleaching
Sequence

Softwood
CEHDED
Hardwood
CEHDD

Softwood
CEHDHED
Hardwood
CEHED

CHEHH
                            Flow
                      kl/kkg   (kgal/ton)
                     CHED
                     CEHD
170.6
177.2
218.1
188.6
199.3
188.1
225.6
204.3

197.7
197.2
182.6
192.5

161.8
157.2
173.9
164.3
            123.0
            110.1
             99.7
            110.9

            172.6
(40.9)
(42.5)
(52.3)
(45.2)

(47.8)
(45.1)
(54.1)
(49.0)

(47.4)
(47.3)
(43.8)
(46.2)

(38.8)
(37.7)
(41.7)
(39.4)

(29.5)
(26.4)
(23.9)
(26.6)

(41.3)
                             III-105

-------
5.   BCT and Market Kraft Mills









Three mills producing BCT papers and market pulp, located in the South,




were visited during the color surveys.  All three mills bleached at




least 51 percent softwood pulp during the survey period and all three




utilized CEH bleaching for the first three stages of their bleaching




sequence (Mill 113 used CHD on their hardwood pulp).  The average color




load was 268 kg/kkg (526 Ibs/ton) for the three mills.









The percentage of softwood pulp bleached appeared to be a major factor




in contributing to the relative color load from these mills.  Mill 122




bleached the highest percentage of softwood pulp, 81 percent, and had




the highest color load, 312 kg/kkg (624 Ibs/ton).  Mill 113 had the




lowest percentage of softwood pulp bleached, 51 percent, and had the




lowest color load 227 kg/kkg (454 Ibs/ton).  Table 15 shows the com-




parison for the three BCT and market kraft mills.
                              III-106

-------
                               TABLE 15

            COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT
                       BCT AND MARKET KRAFT
Mill
No.
100



113



122



Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
Percent
Softwood
56
54
54
54
46
61
48
51
69
79
100
81
Color
kg/kkg
224.0
283.5
242.5
250.0
182.0
232.5
266.5
227.0
257.0
398.0
281.5
312.0
Load
(Ibs/ton)
(448)
(567)
(485)
(500)
(364)
(465)
(533)
(454)
(514)
(796)
(563)
(624)
Bleaching
Sequence
Softwood
CEHD
Hardwood
CEHDH
Softwood
CEHDEDD
Hardwood
CHDED
CEHD




kl/kkg
215.2
239.8
226.4
227.1
159.7
207.2
167.6
178.2
108.4
117.6
138.0
121.3
Flow
(kgal/ton)
(51.6)
(57.5)
(54.3)
(54.5)
(26.0)
(49.7)
(40.2)
(42.7)
(26.0)
(28.2)
(33.1)
(39.1)
Average
268.0
(526)
176.0
(42.1)
6.   Dissolving Kraft



Two dissolving kraft mills, both located in the South, were visited

during the color survey project.  The average color load at the influent

to the secondary wastewater treatment plant at the mills was 363.5

kg/kkg (727 Ibs/ton) at Mill 108 and 369 kg/kkg (738 Ibs/ton) at Mill

127.  Mill 127 bleached 100 percent softwood pulp, while Mill 108

bleached 72 percent softwood pulp during the color survey.  Table 16

shows the comparison of the color survey results at these two dissolving

kraft mills.
                              III-107

-------
                               TABLE 16

   COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT - DISSOLVING KRAFT
Mill
No.
108
127
Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
Percent
Softwood
73
71
72
72
100
100
100
100
Color
kg/kkg
319.0
333.5
437.5
363.5
332.5
401.0
373.5
369.0
Load
(Ibs/ton)
(638)
(667)
(875)
(727)
(665)
(802)
(738)
(738)
Bleaching
Sequence
CHEDED
CEHDED
kl/kkg
243.5
234.4
268.8
248.8
217.3
247.3
209.8
224.8
Flow
(kgal/ton)
(58.4)
(56.2)
(64.4)
(59.7)
(52.1)
(59.3)
(50.3)
(53.9)
Subcategory Average
                       336.0
(732)
237.4
(56.8)
7.
Soda
One of the two operating soda mills in the United States was visited

during the color survey project.  The results of the survey at the mill

are shown on Table 17.



                               TABLE 17

         COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT - SODA
Mill
No.
152
Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
Percent
Softwood
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
Color Load
kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
156.5 (313)
124.5 (249)
137.0 (274)
139.5 (279)
Bleaching
Sequence
JL
CEH j k
— P
Flow
kl/kkg (kgal/ton)
193.5 (46.4)
274.4 (63.4)
248.9 (59.7)
235.6 (56.5)
*Bleach Plant uses a CEH sequence with a portion of the bleached pulp sent
 to a fourth stage peroxide bleaching.
                              III-108

-------
8.   Mills Utilizing Multiple Pulping and Mixed Products



Mills 102 and 125 manufacture various products utilizing two or more

kinds of pulp.  Mill 102 manufactures bleached and unbleached board,

while Mill 125 manufactures bleached kraft and groundwood pulp for the

production of newsprint, market kraft, and coated and uncoated papers.

Table 18 shows the results of the color survey at each of the two mills.
                               TABLE 18

           COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT -
                   MULTIPLE PULPING, MIXED PRODUCTS
Mill
No.
102
125
Day of
Survey
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
Percent
Softwood
38
, 39
40
39
100
85
100
94
Color
kg/kkg
125.5
143.0
131.5
133.3
238.0
277.0
313.0
276.0
Load
(Ibs/ton)
(251)
(286)
(263)
(267)
(476)
(554)
(626)
(552)
Bleaching
Sequence
CEDED
CEHED
kl/kkg
264.8
239.4
245.6
249.9
126.3
135.9
142.6
139.3
Flow
(kgal/ton)
(63.5)
(57.4)
(58.9)
(59.9)
(30.3)
(32.6)
(34.2)
(32.4)
Average
205.0
(410)
193.1
(46.2)
9.    Summary



A bar graph was used to compare all the subcategories and indicate the

general conclusions which were made during this evaluation phase of the

color project.  Figure 44 shows the bar graph comparison by subcategory.
                             III-109

-------
                                               FIGURE
                        COMPARISON  OF>  SUBCATEGORIES-
c
o
a>
                    FINE
                   KRAFT
                             SODA
                                                                                   MULTIPLE. PULPING,
                                                                                   MIXED  PRODUCTS
MARKET
 KRAFT
BUT
               FINEStMARKET
                                                                       KRAFT
                                                     KRAFT
                                     PERCENT  SOFTWOOD
 COA-RSE
8MARKET
  KRAFT
         DISSOLVING
           KRAFT
                                                                                                 81%
                                                                                                       100%
        0 (0)
                                                MILL  NUMBER
                                                                                   	  AVERAGE FORSUBCATEGORY

-------
Each subcategory was presented-so that the mill with the lowest average




color load at the influent to the secondary treatment was shown first,




and the remaining mills shown in order of increasing average color load.




The average color load for the subcategory was shown as a dashed line




through the mill bar graphs in that subcategory.  Also shown on the




Figure was the average percent softwood pulp bleached during the color




survey for each mill.









As was mentioned in the preceding portions of this section, there was a




definite indication that mills bleaching softwood pulp would have higher




color load than a similar mill bleaching hardwood pulp.  This has been




reported in previous studies done by others on color from bleached kraft




mills.  The mill with the highest average color load in 5 of the 7 sub-




categories surveye'd (Mill 152 not included) also bleached the highest




percent softwood pulp.  In one of the 2 subcategories where this was not




the case, BCT kraft, the mill bleaching the highest percent softwood




pulp, Mill 117, used hypochlorite on their caustic extraction filtrate




which was sewered to reduce their color load.  In the other subcategory,




fine and market kraft, 2 mills of the 5 mills surveyed bleached 60 and




100 percent softwood, while the other 3 mills were in a range from 30 to




40 percent softwood pulp bleached.  Mill 106 and 107 had an average




color load of 301 kg/kkg (602 Ibs/day), while the 3 mills which bleached




the lower percent 'softwood pulp had an average color load of 191 kg/kkg




(382 Ibs/ton).  A more detailed evaluation of softwood versus hardwood




bleached pulp, and the resulting color load will follow.










                              Ill-Ill

-------
H.   WOOD SPECIE









After evaluating the comparison by subcategory it was determined that an




analysis of the color load versus the wood specie bleached should be




undertaken.  The approximate effect upon color load that results from




the percent of softwood or hardwood pulp bleached was calculated for




various sample locations.  The intent of the evaluation was to establish




whether sufficient data existed for providing BATEA effluent color




limitations which would depend upon the wood species pulped.  The




evaluation by subcategory had indicated that mills which bleached higher




percentages of softwood pulp had greater color loads than those ex-




perienced at mills which bleached higher percentages of hardwood pulp.









1.   Wood Specie's Effect on Color From Bleach Plant









The effect that the percent softwood or hardwood pulp bleached had upon




the color load in the first chlorinatiori stage effluent was evaluated




(see Figure 45).   Data from mixed hardwood and softwood bleach plants




showed a general trend of increasing color load with increasing percent




softwood pulp bleached.  The average color load for the samples at the




first chlorination stage when 100 percent softwood pulp was bleached was




28.5 kg/kkg (57 Ibs/ton).  The average color load for those samples




taken at the first chlorination stage when 100 percent hardwood pulp was




bleached was 17 kg/kkg (34 Ibs/ton).
                              III-112

-------
                      FIGURE  45
  SOFTWOOD  VERSUS. HARDWOOD
       AT THE  FIRST CHLORINATIQN
               STAGE  FILTRATE
80(160)
                                            r (160) 80
I
70(140) -
60(120) <
(
<
"c 50(1 00) -<
o
X (
in
-Q
f
1
)
1
)
>

1


C 0 0
1
o> (
£ 40 (80) •
o>

" i
Q
O 30 (60) '
-1 AVERAGE 	 (
I

8 <
o



0 ° 0
(
I
0? • f
-1 ik ° <
O ffi CJD <
•(140) 70
-(120) 60
>
o
-(100)50 o
r
o
^n

r~
O
- (80) 40 ' o
) "
yr
 i
> i
0 20(40)-! ° 	 	 Jy (40)20
I 0 f* — AVERAGE
1 OR
1 ° ° 1
i i
10 (20) H » (20)10
« ,«, 1 <5>
!
ln\ n
0    10   20   30  40   50   60
                %  HARDWOOD

100  90   80   70  60   50   40
                %  SOFTWOOD
                                    70   80  90  100
                                     30   20   10
O   SINGLE POINT

•   MULTIPLE POINT

-------
A probability curve showing the color loads at the first stage chlorina-

tion effluent and the percent of the values which were less than or

equal to a specific color load was also plotted (see Figure 46).




The first caustic extract stage was then evaluated.  The population

distribution function of the first caustic extract stage showed that

most had color loads less than 150 kg/kkg (300 Ibs/ton) of bleach plant

production, but color loads ranged as high as 550 kg/kkg (1100 Ibs/ton).

The color loads for 100 percent softwood pulp bleached reflected  this

wide range:  the average 168 kg/kkg (336 Ibs/ton) was significantly

greater than the median 120 kg/kkg (240 Ibs/ton).  Color loads for

bleaching 100 percent hardwood averaged 45.5 kg/kkg (91 Ibs/ton)  and had

a median of 30 kg/kkg (60 Ibs/ton).  A marked increase in color load was

observed with increasing softwood pulp bleached.
                  I



Figure 47 shows a graph with the first caustic extract stage data plot-

ted.  A probability curve for the first caustic extract stage data was

plotted and is shown on Figure 48.




The first chlorination and caustic extract stages were then added and a

graph showing 100 percent softwood, 100 percent hardwood, and various

points representing fractions of softwood and hardwood pulp bleached

were plotted.  Figure 49 shows the plot of these data points.




The color loads for the 100 percent softwood pulp bleached reflected the

wide range of values determined.  Color loads for the 100 percent soft-

wood pulp bleached averaged 222 kg/kkg (444 Ibs/ton) which was well




                              III-114

-------
c
o
O
<
o
O
o
  90(180)
  80 (160)
  70(140)
  60(120)
  50(100)
  40 (80)
  30 (60)
  20 (40)
  10 (20)
0 (0)

   0.01
                                     FIGURE: 46
                 FIRST  CHLORINATION  STAGE  FILTRATE
             I
                  j	I
          0.05 0.1 0.2  0.5  I
                             10   20   30 40 50  60  70  80    90


                                  % OF THE TIME < GIVEN VALUE
                                                               95
98  99
99.8 99.9
99.99

-------
c
o
X
in
O>


en


O

O

cr
O

O
O
                                FIGURE   47  .
            SOFTWOOD  VERSUS  HARDWOOD
     AT   THE  FIRST  CAUSTIC  EXTRACT  STAGE
550 (1100) -i
<
<
i
500(1000)-
450 (900)-
<
400(800)-
350 (700)-

(
300 (600)-


250 (500)-
i
<
200 (400)J
<
150 (300)-<
1
>
)
\
t
>
)
)






)
1
5 0
0
1
0
) 0
)
i ° °
100 (200)-i ° 0
T (
-(1100)550

- (1000)500
- (900)450
- (800)400
O
- (700)350 0
O
r
o
- (600) 300 0
(O
JT
- (500)250 ^
CT
(A
O
3
- (400) 200
- (300)150

>
I °° A
I §0 0 T
50 (IOO)-T 4(100)50
i j^-AVERAGE
A m
0 (0)-
c
'
0 ,
f\ i
1)1111111
) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1C
L (0) 0
)0
SINGLE POINT

MULTIPLE POINT
                                   %  HARDWOOD
                100  90   80
70  60   50  40   30   20
     %  SOFTWOOD
10

-------
                                                       FIGURE  48

                                 FIRST   CAUSTIC   EXTRACT   STAGE;
   600 (1200)
o  500 (1000)

\
in
cn
   40O (800)
   300 (600)
CC
O
_l

3  200 (4pO)
   100 (200)
     0   (0)
           0.01   0.05 O.I 0.2   0.5  I    2
10     20   30  40  50  60  70   80     90   95     98  99      99.8 99.9      99.99
                                                       %  OF THE TIME < GIVEN VALUE

-------
                      FIGURE   49
SOFTWOOD VERSUS HARDWOOD.
FOR COMBINED FIRST CHLORINATION
AND CAUSTIC EXTRACT STAGES
600(1200) r -| (1200) 600
I
I
2 5.5.0 (1 1 00) (
o 1
X
.a 500 (1000)
j* 450 (900) (
o>
•* 400 (800)
Q"
0 350 (700) '
0 300 (600) '


-


-
"

-


-
0
0 250 (500) A- °
rt v r rr ft r* r M
MV t K AvJ C ^1
200 (400) T- °
MEDIAN 	 »J ° °
150 (300)?- ° -,
a o
8 o '
9 O
100 (200) |-
T "
50 (100) '

0 (0)

o


(1100) 550


(1000)500
(900) 450

(800) 400

(700) 350
(600) 300
(500) 250
(400) 200

(300) 150



(200) 100






O
O
f—
0
33
0
0
y,.
(O
£
I
o
•3







< AVFRARF
""(1 00) 50

1 Id 1 1 II 1 1 T (0) 0
_..._Q. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
	 	 „ .. % HARDWOOD
... LOQ....9JD-. 8.0 70 60 .50 .40 3.0 20 ..10 0
MEDIAN





                           %  SOFTWOOD
    SINGLE POINT
•   MULTIPLE POINT

-------
above the median value of 167.5 kg/kkg (335 Ibs/ton) of bleach plant

                                                               i
production.  The 100 percent hardwood pulp data points indicated a much


smaller spread.  The color loads averaged 64 kg/kkg (128 Ibs/ton) and


the median was 52.5 kg/kkg (105 Ibs/ton).




Three probability curves were plotted for the combined first chlor-


ination and first caustic extract stages.  The curves-represented a plot


of the color load resulting from 100 percent softwood,  100 percent

hardwood, and mixed hardwood and softwood points.  Also shown was a plot


of all sample points (see Figure 50).  The plot of all the sample points


reflected the skewing tendency which resulted with increasing percent


softwood pulp bleached.




2.   Wood Specie's Effect on Total Color at the Secondary Treatment Influent




The total color at the influent to the secondary treatment system had


been used in most of the previous evaluations of the data collected


during the pulp and paper mill color surveys.  For the purpose of deter-


mining BATEA effluent color limitations based upon wood species pulped,


the secondary treatment influent provides the best sample location for


making this determination.




Figure 51 shows the color load population distribution functions for


three cases at the secondary treatment influent.  Points representing


color load resulting from 100 percent softwood, 100 percent hardwood,

and mixed hardwood and softwood samples were plotted.   Figure 52 shows a




                              III-119

-------
                                                    FIGURE   5O
                           COMBINED   FIRST  CHLORINATION  AND

                              FIRST  CAUSTIC  EXTRACT  STAGES
 i  600(1200)
c
o
o>
   500 (1000)
   400 (800)
o>


Q" 300 (600)


O
_l


a:
_J
O
o
   200 (400)
   100 (200)
         (0)
O ALL POINTS

A 100% SW


O 100% HW

D MIXED HW.SW
          O.OI   O.O5 O.I 0.2   0.5  I
                          10
20  30  40  50  60  70   SO
90   95
98  99
99.8 99.9
99.99
                                                     %  OF THE TIME
-------
c
o
   450(900)
   400(800)
   350 (700)
cr>
   300(600)
o>
.it
Q
<
O  250 (500)
_l

cr
o
_i

°  200(400)
   150 (300)
   100 (200)
    50 (100)
          0.01
                                                        FIGURE   51

                            SECONDARY   TREATMENT  INFLUENT
     A 100 % sw

     O 100% HW

     D MIXED HW, SW
                     I
             \	I
0.05 O.I 0.2   0.5   I
10      20   30  40  50  60   70   80     90


       % OF  THE  TIME < GIVEN VALUE
95
98   99
99.8 99.9
                                                                                                                                 99.99

-------
                    FIGURE 52
      SOFTWOOD  VERSUS  HARDWOOD
AT THE  SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT






*£
o
X
It)
CT.
_^
\
o>
Q
O
o:
o

o
o















450 (900)

400 (800)*
<
350 (700)
<

MEDIAN 	 ^
300 (600)
AVERAGE 	 »•


250 (500)
(

200 (400)




150 (300)

(
(

100 (200)
<

50 (100)
O (01
i-
O
»• o
1
-
0 0
0
o
L o
o
o
0 0
o
0 0
0 8°
o°o
o •<
0
0 0
0 °

_ O o <
O u 0 -
o ,
\
> 0 ° 0 " <
o ,
o
o -
' ° {
0 '
o
• —
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(900) 450

(800)400

(700)350



(600) 300



(500) 250
>
J
X400) 200



•^ 	 AVERAGE
1300)150
JM fui r n i A M
^ MtUIMN
)
3

(200) 100
5

(100) 50
(Ol O
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% HARDWOOD
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
% SOFTWOOD






o
O
r'
0
r
0
^
0
y.
(O
3T
Id
CT
U)

O
3
^-'















-------
plot of the sample data points at the secondary treatment influent on




the basis of percent softwood and hardwood pulp bleached versus color  •




load.  The color loads resulting from bleaching 100 percent hardwood




pulp showed a range from approximately 82 kg/kkg (165 Ibs/ton) to 250




kg/kkg (500 Ibs per ton)".  The color loads resulting from bleaching 100




percent softwood pulp ranged from 100 to 425 kg/kkg (200 to 850 Ibs/ton),




Color loads resulting from bleaching mixed softwood and hardwood pulps




had ranged from 75 to 450 kg/kkg (150 to 900 Ibs/ton).  The average




color load for 100 percent softwood pulp bleached was 281 kg/kkg (561




Ibs/ton),  which was slightly less than the 313 kg/kkg (626 Ibs/ton)




median value.  The median value being higher than the average reflected




the scattering of points in the lower color load range.  The 100 percent




hardwood pulp bleached averaged 151 kg/kkg (302 Ibs/ton) with a median




of 137 kg/kkg (274 Ibs/ton).  Color loadings from the bleaching of mixed




softwood and hardwood pulps tended to increase with increasing levels of




softwood pulp bleached.









The preceding evaluations showed the need for providing limits which




would vary depending upon the proportion of softwood or hardwood pulped




and bleached.  Section VI will therefore determine BATEA effluent color




limitations based upon the percent softwood pulped and bleached.









I.   ANALYSIS OF BLEACHING SEQUENCES









As shown by data presented previously in this Section, there is a sig-




nificant variation in color load from bleach plant to bleach plant where
                              III-123

-------
similar species are bleached to corresponding final brightnesses.  In an

attempt to identify the factors causing these variations bleaching

variables were examined for their relative potential to influence color

generation.



To facilitate this analysis, the mills surveyed were separated into two

general bleaching categories based on sequence used.  Group A involved 5

mills:  numbers 102, 106, 121, 126, and 187 all using the CEDED sequence.

Group B involved 18 mills and 26 bleach plants:  numbers 100, 101, 103,

105, 107, 108, 111, 113, 114, 118, 119, 121, 122, 125, 127, 136, 140,

and 161 all using a significant amount of hypochlorite in their sequences

along with chlorine dioxide in various configurations.


                                                                                  •N
The number of stages in Group B varied from 4 to 7 with a wide variety

of combinations as shown in Table 19.



                             TABLE 19

                    GROUP B BLEACHING SEQUENCES

Sequence                                     Number

CEHD                                           6
CEHDH                                          3
CEHED                                          5
CEHDED                                         4
CEHDD                                          1
CHEDED                                         1
CEHDEDD                 '                       1
CHDED                                          1
CHHD                                           2
CHEHD                                          1
CE-DHD                                          1

Code:     C = Chlorination
          E = Caustic Extraction
          H = Hypochlorite (sodium or calcium)
          D = Chlorine .dioxide


                              III-124

-------
Two unusual sequences were not placed in any specific group for data

analysis.  They were Mill 117 with its CEHH sequence and Mill 152 with

its CEHP, where the "P" indicates hydrogen peroxide bleach solution

being used on the last step for a portion of its bleached pulp.



1.   Rationale for Categorization



The selection of the two general bleaching categories indicated as Group

A and Group B is based on a very simple factor, namely, the use of

hypochlorite.bleach in Group B and the absence of its use in Group A.

Chlorine and chlorine dioxide are common to both groups.  Hypochlorite

bleach was selected as it has been reported that its use has a sig-

nificant effect on reduction of bleach plant color.  In the subsequent

analysis of variables within each sequence, the effects are further

investigated on the basis of wood species category.



2.   Bleaching Factors Investigated



The following bleaching factors were determined to be potentially sig-

nificant in regard to color generation versus sequence grouping:

1.   Bleaching sequence (within Group B)

2.   Chlorine application
                  I
3.   Hypochlorite .application



Further analysis of bleaching is discussed later in this report.  The

thrust of this particular section is to analyze the effect of the overall



                              III-125

-------
bleaching sequence on color generation rather than investigating oper-




ating parameters to a great degree.









a.   Bleaching Sequence within Group B.  Group A bleaching sequences are




all the same, namely CEDED; thus no analysis of sequence variation is




necessary.  However, in Group B there are 11 different variations of




sequences using chlorine, hypochlorite, and chlorine dioxide, in most




cases in conjunction with sodium hydroxide stages.  Although the bleach




plant is recognized as a complex chemical process with many variables




which could theoretically have an effect on color of the final bleach




plant effluent, claims have been made for improved color from sequence




variation.  Ideally, to investigate the effect of this particular item,




a single bleach plant bleaching a uniform species to a uniform final




brightness should be investigated using the different sequence var-




iations.  However, this was not a practical approach; thus, it was




considered worthwhile to attempt an analysis based on the survey data as




well as some additional data obtained in a follow-up discussion of




internal operating conditions with the subject mills.









b.   Chlorine Application.  Both main sequence groups utilize chlorine




in the first stage of each bleach plant surveyed, which is the case in




the majority of bleach plants throughout the industry.  The only variation




is where chlorine dioxide is substituted for chlorine in the first stage




in various percentages up to nearly 100%.  None of the mills in this




survey utilized chlorine dioxide in the first bleaching stage, although




suppliers' data indicated that its use can reduce bleach plant color









                               III-126

-------
 (i.e., Rapson and Reeves).  Thus, there is no survey data to allow




 analysis of the effect of chlorine dioxide and the task becomes one of




 comparing the effects of the amount of chlorine used per ton of pulp




 versus color generation.









 c.   Hypochlorite Application.  Several sources identified the sub-




 stitution of chlorine dioxide with hypochlorite bleach as a method for




 reducing bleach plant color.  All bleach plants in Group B utilized




 hypochlorite for bleaching in addition to chlorine dioxide.   Thus, it




 would be expected that the various ratios of chlorine dioxide to hypo-




 chlorite might show a relationship to color generation within a given




 species category.









 3.   Discussion of Sequence Variables









 There are many variables, both controlled and uncontrolled,  which have a




 potential to affect color generation from the bleaching process.  The




 complexity of the process and interaction of operating variables would




 require monitoring of numerous simultaneous events in order  to determine




 the causes of subtle changes in effluent color.   This study  did not go




 to that degree of effort and as a practical necessity limited itself to




 analysis of items judged to be apparent without  extensive variable




monitoring.









 The following discussions of the effects of bleaching sequences on color




of bleach plant effluent are based on analysis of data obtained during




 the mill survey phase of the study.








                                 III-127

-------
a.   Bleaching Sequence Discussion.  Group A bleach sequence was CEDED




with a range of color in the bleach plant effluent from 217 Ibs/ton to




1,096 Ibs/ton.  Mill No. 102 showed the lowest figure and bleached both




hardwood and softwood to a brightness of 87+ points G.E.  Mill No. 126




showed the highest per ton color and it bleached only softwood to a




brightness of 87+ points.








All mills in Group A bleached to a brightness in excess of 87 points



with Mill No. 187 bleaching as high as 92 points during the survey




period.








All mills in Group A that produced data used in this analysis are




located in the South, thus similar wood species were used in each.




Nothing significant can be noted from Group A bleaching sequence other




than the fact that a wide variation of color can be found within the




group under similar operating and geographic conditions.








Group B which consisted of 11 variations of use of the bleaching agents




chlorine, chlorine dioxide and hypochlorite, showed a bleach plant ef-



fluent color range of from 38 Ibs/ton to 1,080 Ibs/ton.  Mill No. 103




showed the lowest color while bleaching hardwood to a brightness of 85



points while Mill No. 107 had the highest figure and bleached only
                  I


softwood to a brightness in excess of 87 points.








The CEHD sequence was the most popular with CEHED and CEHDED also being



used extensively throughout the 26 bleach plants in the group.  The







                                 III-128

-------
three sequences accounted for 58 percent of the plants surveyed.  No one




sequence showed any trend toward lower color generation within Group B;




however, Group B did show a lower average per ton color load than Group




A (237 Ibs/ton versus 452 Ibs/ton).









Group B generally bleached to a lower brightness than Group A; however,




that was not considered to be a significant factor due to the fact that




the great majority of color is generated early in the bleaching sequence




regardless of final brightness.  The significance of brightness is more




fully explored later in this report.









The percentage of hardwood and softwood bleached in each group was




almost identical.  Group A averaged 49% hardwood and 51% softwood, while




Group B averaged 48% hardwood and 52% softwood.  Thus, species effect on




average color of the sequence groups was not a factor.









It would appear from the survey data that there is significant reason to




expect the sequences utilizing hypochlorite bleach to produce an ef-




fluent with less color than sequences using no hypochlorite, all other




major process parameters being similar.









Figures 53 and 54 show the relative color contribution from bleach




plants in each bleaching group.









b.   Chlorine Application Discussion.  An attempt was made to determine




the effect of chlorination degree on color loading in bleach plant








                                 III-129

-------
   100
   101
   102
   103
   105
   106
   107
   108
   110
                                     FIGURE   53
                       BLEACH   PLANT  COLOR
                         BLEACHING   GROUP  A
   113
0  H4
-I
2
   117
   118
   119
   121
   122
   125
   126
   127
   134
   136
   140
   152
   161
   187
      (0)
      0
                                                                                           1109
(100)
 50
                            (200)
                             100
1
(300)
150
i
(400)
200
i
(500)
250
i
(600)
300
"I
(700)
350
                           TOTAL BLEACH PLANT  COLOR  kg/kkg  (Ibs/ton)

-------
                             FIGURE  54   .
              BLEACH   PLANT   COLOR
                 BLEACHING   GROUP   B
(0)
 o
(100)
 50
(200)
 100
(300)
 150
(400)
 200
(500)
250
(600)
 300
(700)
 350
                    TOTAL  BLEACH  PLANT COLOR   kg/kkg  (Ibs/ton)

-------
effluent.  Figure 55 shows points plotted for the bleach plants in Group




B with hardwood and softwood plotted separately due to their different




chlorine requirements.









No reliable statistical relationship was seen to exist between chlorine




usage and bleach plant effluent color in Ibs/ton, based on the survey




data.









c.   Hypochlorite Application Discussion.  An attempt was also made to




determine the effect of the amount of hypochlorite used per ton of




bleached pulp, on color loading in bleach plant effluent.  As the




sequence group comparison-indicated that the use of hypochlorite re-




sulted in lower color generation, it was reasonable to expect the amount




of hypochlorite used to be a predictable factor.  Figure 56 shows




hypochlorite percentage plotted aginst bleach plant color in Ibs/ton




with hardwood and softwood being plotted separately.









Statistical analysis of the survey data does not show any reliable




relationship to exist between percent hypochlorite and bleach plant




color.  Although this relationship has been shown in laboratory work,




apparently too many other factors were present in the survey data to




verify the expected results.
                                 III-132

-------
                                     FIGURE   55
        BLEACH  PLANT  COLOR   VS.
                                                                     USAGE
  200-i(400)
o
  150
o
o
o.  100-
x
o
m
   50-
       (300)'
               O'2I
       (200)
                             Ol52
                    O161
                  Ol36
       (100)
           O 140
QII3


Qll9
                                  O 100
                                                    O   HARDWOOD
                                                    A   SOFTWOOD
                                                    D   COMBINED
                                                                         n
                                                     A no
g
                                                   117
                                                   121
                                                                 A114
                                                  A161
                                                            A 134
                                                                 Al36
                                                        113
                                                                                  A 125
                                                                                      I03A
                                                                             A'oo
                                                                             A I 19

-------
                                      FIGURE  56
                            BLEACHING   GROUP  B
BLEACH   PLANT  COLOR  VS.  % HYPOCHLORITE   USED
      400-,(800)
      350 -
  ~   300
  o
      250-
  cc
  o
  o
  o
  x
  u
  HI
  _1
  m
      200-
150-
      100-
       50-
    (700)
    (600)
    (500)
    (400)
(300)
    (200)
    (100)
            I03Q


          Ql40
                                            D
                                QII4
                                 O152
                                 O161
IOOQ
                                            "19
                                        125
                                                         O   HARDWOOD
                                                         A   SOFTWOOD
                                                         D   COMBINED
                                         A114
                                           136 A
                                                        n
                                                    A 125
                                                             Q|36
                                                                   O134
                                                                        A
                                                                    119
                      I
                     1.0
                                      2.0
                                                         3.0
                                                                                          I7A
                                                                                    4.0
                                       TOTAL  HYPOCHLORITE  (%)

-------
J.   INTERNAL PARAMETERS COMPARISON









As noted in preceding sections, there were variations in color gen-




eration in pounds per ton of bleached pulp within the subcategories.  In




an attempt to identify factors causing these variations, kraft pulping




and bleaching variables were examined for their relative potential to




influence color generation.  The following variables were determined to




be potentially significant:









     1.   Wood Species




     2.   Degree of pulping ("K" or KAPPA numbers)




     3.   Brown stock washing efficiency (overall)




     4.   White liquor sulfidity




     5.   Bleaching sequence and application




     6.   Chlorine application




     7.   Bleach extraction stage ("K" or KAPPA numbers)




     8.   Type of chlorine dioxide generation




     9.   Type of hypochlorite used




    10.   Final pulp brightness









Liquor spills and leaks certainly would have an effect on color var-




iations and the sample teams were kept appraised of any such occurrence




by mill management during their sampling periods.









1.   Selection of Variables









The rationale for selection of these variables is  as follows:








                                 III-135

-------
a.   Wood Species.  The effect of wood species on color and the data to




support the supposition is included in a previous section.  That section




deals only with the two general species categories of hardwood and




softwood.  No attempt was made to identify the relative contributions of




any one type of wood within a general category as data was not available




from the mill sampling selected.









b.   Degree of Pulping ("K" or KAPPA Numbers).  The thoroughness of




delignification of pulp is traditionally measured by the "K" number or




the KAPPA number test.  The two are similar and result in an indirect




measurement of the amount of lignin left in the pulp after cooking.  As




the reacted lignin is known to be a major color contributor, it follows




that an analysis of degree of pulping in a general species category




might explain color variations.









c.   Brown Stock Washing Efficiency (Overall).  The solubilized wood   ~\




constituents which make up the majority of kraft mill color potential




are separated from the fiber mass on brown stock washers and the major




portion is subjected to evaporation and burning for chemical and heat




recovery.  However, the washing system is not 100 percent efficient and




efficiency varies from mill to mill depending on a number of factors




such as system capacity and washer design, as well as operating pro-




cedures.









The "black liquor" not washed out of the pulp mass follows the pulp




through the process and ultimately finds its way to the effluent stream.










                                 III-136

-------
Where it exits depends on system design with the (a) screen room ef-




fluent (2) brown stock decker effluent (c) bleach plant effluent; all




being sources of discharge.  In some plants, the screen room system is




closed to a high degree and decker water is recycled back to the brown




stock washers.  This, in effect, adds an additional stage of washing and




the brown stock washer soda losses are not an accurate measurement of




what finally reaches the effluent.  In such systems the pulp leaving the




screening system for bleaching contains the color causing material which




will exit at the bleach plant in a reacted form.









Brown stock washer soda losses, as well as brown stock screened pulp




decker soda losses, were candidates for investigation.









d.   White Liquor Sulfidity.  The kraft pulping process involves the




formation of soluble organic sulfur compounds which have been identified




as having color causing potential.  The amount of sodium sulfide in




kraft cooking liquor or "white liquor" is measured and expressed in




terms of percent sulfidity.  This test is an indicator of the amount of




sulfide available for reaction during the cooking process.  It follows




that if the soluble organic sulfur compounds have a significant impact




on effluent color then the amount of sulfur used in the cooking process




is worthy of investigation.









e.   Bleaching Sequence and Application.   The bleach plant is recognized




as a significant source of effluent color and the reasons for variability




of this source are worthy of investigation.  This was covered in a




previous section.






                                 III-137

-------
f.   Chlorine Application.  The effect of excess chlorine and ultimately




chlorine in the bleach plant effluent was discussed as part of the




previous section.









g.   Bleach Extraction Stage ("K" or KAPPA Numbers).  Bleaching is now




thought of by the industry as an extension of the pulping process in




that it involves the further purification of cellulose by removal of




colored materials, primarily lignin.  One of the control techniques used




in most bleach plants is a measurement of lignin removal after the




second or caustic extraction stage of bleaching.  This test is a "K"




number or KAPPA number as used in the cooking phase and indicates the




solubilization of lignin and its subsequent removal to the bleach plant




effluent.  An attempt was made to correlate bleach plant color and this




test.









h.   Type of Chlorine Dioxide Generation.  Although the type of C1CL




generator used is not considered to be a significant process variable as




far as bleaching effluent color is concerned, there is the possibility




of an effect on final effluent color.  If the spent acid from the




generation process is not recovered and is sewered it has the potential




to affect final effluent color and for that reason was investigated.









i.   Type of Hypochlorite Used.  Those mills using hypochlorite as a




bleaching agent use two types:   namely sodium and calcium.  The chemical




suppliers have indicated that a reduction in effluent color has been




noted from the use of calcium hypochlorite as compared to sodium hypo-




chlorite.  An attempt was made to verify this contention in the mills




surveyed.




                                 III-138

-------
j.   Final Pulp Brightness.  As previously discussed, bleaching is no




more than an extension of pulping where cellulose purification is the




objective.  Considering brightness of the bleached pulp as a measurement




of the degree of purification then it may be possible to establish a




relationship between brightness and effluent color for a given species




mix.  Data collected were analyzed for this relationship.









2.   Data Collection









To acquire data to evaluate the potential color source relationships, it




was necessary to request additional information from the survey mills.




This was accomplished by developing a questionnaire which was completed




primarily by telephone communications.  The data requested was concerned




with process variables and conditions existing within the plant at the




time of the sampling procedure.









A sample of the form used to collect the additional data is shown in




Appendix VI.









3.   Discussion of Relationship Investigations









Before attempting to discuss the potential relationships between the




particular process variables and color variation, it is necessary to




comment on the complexity of the kraft process.









                                 III-139

-------
There are many variables, both controlled and uncontrolled, which have a




potential effect on effluent color from the kraft process.  The general




categories are:









     1.   Short-term variations in raw materials




     2.   Seasonal variations in wood supply




     3.   Production rate changes




     4.   Product type variations




     5.   Intentional operating changes




     6.   Unintentional operating changes




     7.   Liquor spills and leaks









To determine subtle changes in color as a result of one specific var-




iable involves the' monitoring of literally hundreds of operating events




and analysis of a substantial amount of data.  This was beyond the scope




of this investigation and analysis was of necessity limited to those




relationships which were significant enough to be apparent without




extensive monitoring of other variables.









The following discussions, of each process item investigated as having a




potentially significant effect on color in kraft effluent, are based on




data accumulated from the supplementary questionnaire.









a.   Wood Species^  As previously mentioned, insufficient data was




available from the surveys to allow quantification of the color po-




tential of individual species of wood within the general classes of




hardwood and softwood.






                                 III-140

-------
Of those mills responding to the questionnaire, the following species

were pulped (see Table 20).



                               TABLE 20

                    DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES PULPED


             Hardwood                        Mills Using

               Oak                                19
               Gum                                13
               Maple                               5
               Beech                               2
               Poplar                              2
               Hickory                             1
               Aspen                               1
               Birch                               1
               Sycamore                            1
               Pecan                               1
               Ash                                 1
               Elm                                 1

             Softwood

               Pine (mixed)                        15
               Loblolly Pine                       9
               Douglas Fir                         2
               Cedar                               1
               Jack Pine                           1
               Hemlock                             1



It can be seen from Table 20 that the predominant woods pulped by the

mills responding were those growing in the south, namely, oak and gum in

the hardwood category, and loblolly pine and mixed pine species in the

softwood category.



A comparison of the relative color contribution of the general cate-

gories of hardwood and softwood is discussed earlier in this report.
                                 III-141

-------
b.   Degree of Pulping.  All kraft categories process their wood chips




to produce pulp in essentially the same manner, with the exceptions of




dissolving kraft pulp mills Nos. 108 and 127.  Figure 57 shows plots of




the two general species categories with degree of cooking as measured by




"K" number versus primary clarifier influent color.  It should be noted




that hardwood and softwood are not "cooked" to the same target "K"




number, thus the separation of species is evident in Figure 57.









Statistical analysis of the data points indicates that no apparent




relationship exists between degree of "cooking" and color generation in




either species category, or if such a relationship exists it is not




significant within the general bleached kraft category.  It should be




noted that the "K" number range within each species category was not




very great due to the common requirements of final pulp.









Of primary concern in the analysis of primary clarifier influent color




is the fact that only three of the mills plotted were 100 percent one




specie.  Mill Nos. 187 and 152 were all hardwood and mill No. 126 was




all softwood, thus the analysis had to take into account the relative




percentage of hardwood and softwood in the mills cooking both simul-




taneously.









An attempt was also made to correlate degree of pulping with color in




the screen room effluent as shown in Figure 58.  However, again no




significant relationship exists.  A relationship that did exist would




most probably be overwhelmed by the effect brown stock washing efficien-




cy has on screen room or decker color loading.







                                 III-142

-------
                                 FIGURE  57
   PULPING   ("K"  NUMBER)  VS.  TOTAL   COLOR
   350 -i (700)
   300-
K  250-


o
2


*  200 H
c
o
J1   I50H
Jt
^
o>
JC


X
o

o
o   100-
    50-
        (600)
                  0,,,
        (500)
        (400)
                100

                101




                 136
        (300)
             187
        (200)
             O"9
        (100)
                         Quo
                      •152
                       II8

                       l40
                       O'°2
       10
                 i     i     I    i

                 12   13   14    15
                                           O   HARDWOOD

                                           A   SOFTWOOD
                                                                         A126
                                                             113
                       A ioi




                       H4A A 136
                                                                    A100
                                                                  A 134
                                               A118
                                                      A 119
                                                           A 102
T    i     i     i    i     r     riii

16   17    18   19   20   21    22   23   24   25
                                    HARDWOOD  K  AND  SOFTWOOD

-------
                               FIGURE  58

       SCREEN   ROOM   OR.DECKER  COLOR

                                      VS-

                               PULPING  K*
    240 -i (480)
    210-4(^20)
in
J3
-   180 -
or
o

o
o
o:
o
LU
O


-------
c.   Brown Stock Washing.  An evaluation of the potential relationship




between brown stock washer losses in the form of sodium chemicals, and




color in the effluent stream from the screening and deckering section of




the kraft process was attempted.  The relationship was plotted in Figure




59 with no distinction between species as shown by the data points.  It




was not possible to develop a hardwood-softwood relationship with this




effluent stream due to the factor that both species were screened and




deckered simultaneously.  In the majority of mills surveyed, due to




potential color concentration at this point in the process, distinction




would not be considered practical.









The plot shows a trend toward higher color load per ton of pulp in the




screen room or decker effluent as the brown stock washer chemical losses




increase.









Figure 60 shows the random nature of screen room or decker color load in




kg/kkg (Ibs/ton) from the mills reporting this data.  No specie or




subcategory trend can be noted although it can be seen that a signi-




ficant amount of color load comes from this source in a large percentage




of the mills surveyed.









Mill No. 152 showed 63 percent of its total color load from the decker




and Mill No. 136 had 45 percent of its total from the same source.  Six




other mills had from 31 to 40 percent of their total color from the




screen room area.









                                 III-145

-------
                                FIGUjRE  59


       BROWN STOCK   WASHER  LOSSES  VS.

         SCREEN   ROOM   OR. DECKER  COLOR


  (BASED  ON   BLEACH   PLANT   PRODUCTION)
  120 i
c
o
in

^  90 H
o>
JL

-------
                                       FIGURE  6O
          BCREEN    ROOM    OR.  DECKER    COLOR
                (HARDWOOD   AND   SOFTWOOD)
o
z
100
101
102
103
105
106
107
108
110
III
113
114
117
118
119
121
122
125
126
127
134
136
140
152
161
187
                                                               Illllllllllll  HARDWOOD
                                                                          SOFTWOOD
                          IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
      (0)
       0
               (50)
                25
(100)
 50
(150)
 75
(200)
 100
(250)
 125
(300)
 150
(350)
 I 75
                             SCREEN ROOM  OR DECKER  COLOR  kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)

-------
The screen room or decker area is the second most significant color

contributor in the mills surveyed with five mills having it as their

major source (Mills Nos. 103, 113, 136, 152 and 161).




d.   White Liquor Sulfidity.  Comparison of white liquor sulfidity with

screen room or decker color load was done to determine if soluble or-

ganic sulfur compounds formed during the cooking process have a sig-

nificant effect on color.  This relationship was analyzed making the

assumption that the three governing factors affecting formation of these

compounds were reasonably uniform in all mills plotted.  The factors

are:




     1.   Actual cooking time

     2.   Cooking temperature
                  i
     3.   Total alkali to wood ratio




It was assumed that the three cooking variables were changed to any

significant degree only when species were different.  Hardwood does not

require the severity of "cook" needed to produce softwood pulp.



Figure 61 shows plotted points which appear to show a trend to increased

color with increased sulfidity.  Further investigation of this rela-

tionship by plotting sulfidity against brown stock washer losses re-

vealed a similar trend as shown in Figure 62.  This secondary rela-

tionship was judged to be coincidental based on an analysis of factors

affecting brown stock washer losses.  However, it helps to explain the

trend shown in Figure 61 as Figure 59 shows that a good correlation



                                  III-148

-------
                            FIGURE  61
    (SCREEN  ROOM  OR  DECKER  COLOR  VS,

          SULFIDITY  OF   COOKING  L
  150 -i (300)
o

\
en
0>
je
jf
  100 H
o
o
o
UJ
IT
O


2
O
O
ir
cc
o
   50 H
 (200)
 [100)
            Al40
                                     A 107
                                 D 103
                                 114
                                   D110

                                    D'34
                                           O  HARDWOOD

                                           A  SOFTWOOD

                                           D  COMBINED
A161

QIGI
                                          All3
15   16  17   18   19   20  21
                                                             D 102
                               22   23   24  25   26   27  28  29   30
                             SULFIDITY  (%)

-------
                                  FIGURE   62

        BROWNSTOCK  WASHER   LOSSES   VS.

                COOKING  LIQUOR   SULFIDITY
   40-1 (80)
   35-
(70)
c
o
to
a
_  30-
(60)
O>
Jt
V)
LJ
UJ
X
v>
o
o
en
o
tr
    25-
(50)
    20-
(40)
    15-
       (30)
    10-
(20)
    5-
(10)
                                              A 161
     D 101
                            a
                              A I 34
   D 126
                           134 Q
                                    Quo
A
A
D
                           no       ioo
                           II7
                                         R"8
                                         ZSioo
                             All9
                         114
                                  D H4
                                        O 100
                                                 O  HARDWOOD

                                                 A  SOFTWOOD

                                                 D  COMBINED
                                                         U '87
                                                          Dl25
                 15
                      20         25

                              SULFIDITY (%)
                 i
                30
 i
35
 1
40

-------
exists between brown stock washer losses and screen room or decker




color.  Thus, the relationship between sulfidity and screen room or




decker color was not judged to be significant.









e.   Bleaching Sequence.  This item was covered in a previous section.









f.   Chlorine Application.  This item was covered in a previous section.









g.   Bleach Plant Control (As Caustic Stage "K" Number).  The signi-




ficance of bleach plant chemical activity as measured by "K" number test




after the first caustic extraction stage and compared to bleach plant




color loading was investigated as shown in Figure 63.









The plot shows a wide scattering of data points with no indication of a




trend.  Hardwood and softwood are usually bleached to different "K"




number targets as with "cooking," and the separation can be noted with




the softwood points plotted at higher "K" number.









A large number of the mills surveyed did not separate hardwood and




softwood bleach plant effluent and those are plotted as "combined" data




points.  Mill Nos. 103, 114, 121, 101, 110,  and 106 are in this cate-




gory.  Mill Nos. 113-, 134, 187, and 140 bleached hardwood and kept the




effluent separate while Mill Nos. 113, 136 and 134 bleached softwood and




also had the effluent isolated to allow sampling for color content.




Mill Nos. 118 and 125 report that they mixed species prior to bleaching.









                               III-151

-------
                                 FIGURE  63  ,
                           ' !••

                 BLEACH   PLANT   COLOR   VS.


                 ;BLEACH   PLANT  CONTROL


           ,{AS   CAUSTIC   STAGE "K" NUMBER)
      i (600)
  250-
      O
   200-
I03


  (100)
                     O110
                  O140


                   O 134
                                         O 101
                                       O"2I
                                                      n 125
 Aioe
                                                D
   113

   121
                                                          O   HARDWOOD

                                                          A   SOFTWOOD

                                                          n   HARDWOOD  AND

                                                                SOFTWOOD  MIXED
                                                               A 134
                                                             O l87
                                                           A114
                                                     A 103
                                                                             A no
                              A
                                 101
                                                                             A '36
      2.5
                        3.5
4.5
5.5
                                     BLEACH PLANT  K

-------
h.   Type of Chlorine Dioxide Generation.  Chlorine dioxide was gener-




ated by five different processes in the mills surveyed.  The processes




used were:









     1.   R-2




     2.   Matheson




     3.   Solvay




     4.   Hooker SVP




     5.   R-3









The R-2 process was the most prevalent and only one mill reported that




it was not recovering its waste acid from chlorine dioxide generation.




That mill had low bleach plant color due to large usage of hypochlorite




so no color effect'could be determined from sewering of the acid.









The survey data did not show a trend toward reduced bleach plant color




from any particular chlorine dioxide generating system.









i.   Type of Hypochlorite.  Figure 64 is a bar chart showing color




contributions from mills using no hypochlorite, mills using sodium




hypochlorite and mills using calcium hypochlorite as a main bleaching




chemical.









The average color from each of the three categories plotted in kg/kkg




(Ibs/ton) was as follows:









                               III-153

-------
(0)
 0
                             FIGURE  64
          BLEACH   PLANT  COLOR
      TYPE  OF    HYPOCHLORITE   USED
            BLEACHING   GROUPS  A  B ^
                                                                           GROUP  A
                                                                           GROUP  B
                                                                                 (1109)
(100)
 50
(200)        (300)        (400)       (500)        (600)
 100         150         200         250         300
TOTAL  BLEACH  PLANT COLOR  kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
(700)
 350

-------
     No hypochlorite               433




     Sodium hypochlorite           220




     Calcium hypochlorite          125









The data shows hypochlorite to have a significant effect on reducing




bleach plant color contribution as was discussed in a previous section;




however it also shows calcium hypochlorite to have an apparent advantage




over sodium hypochlorite.









Thus, the type of hypochlorite bleach used appears to be a significant




color reducing item.  Of the four mills using only calcium hypochlorite




(Mill No. 117 not included), all bleached both hardwood and softwood.









j.   Final Pulp Brightness.  Figure 65 shows a plot of data points




relating final bleached pulp brightness in TAPPI standard units 'to




bleach color in kg/kkg (Ibs/ton).









Statistical analysis of the data does not show a reliable relationship




to exist with a correlation of 0.26, a slope coefficient of 1.93 and a




confidence factor of 83 percent.  A trend does seem to be indicated




showing increasing brightness but not enough data was collected to




establish a significant relationship in any of the two species groups.









K.   SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS









Section III has presented the data gathered during the color surveys at




the 26 bleached kraft and soda mills, and the analyses which were done








                               III-155

-------
                           FIGURE  65


                  FINAL  BRIGHTNESS   VS.


                   BLEACH PLANT   COLOR
  300 -i (600)
o 250-
o>
je
cr
o
_i
o
o
  200-
   150-
X

o
111
_l
m
  100 -
   50-
[500)
(400)
(300)
1200)
(100)
                                         O  HARDWOOD


                                         A  SOFTWOOD


                                         D  COMBINED
                                          105
                                          D'22
                                                   D 127




                                                  D 106
                                                      n
                                           n
                                     Ano
                                     Due
                          O110
                                          n
|36Q  A136     161 D




  100 n n,19
                                            D 134
nio3
    n !|3

140 n n 125
                                   Dl87




                                 n IDS



                                   QII4
         ii'i\IIrr^i    i    iIiiII

     75  76   77  78  79  80   81   82  83  84   85  86  87   88  89   90   91   92
                           FINAL  BRIGHTNESS

-------
with the data.  This portion of the Section will summarize the con-




clusions which were made.









1.   Historical Mill Data









It was concluded that the color surveys were generally conducted during




normal anticipated mill operational levels.  This conclusion was based




on the comparison of operating production levels during the survey to




the historical mill data.









2.   Dominant Wavelength









The range in dominant wavelengths encountered during the surveys were




consistent with those measured for the standards employed.  Therefore,




the acceptance of potassium chlorop^atinate/cobaltous chloride solutions




as an acceptable standard for the measurement of color in mill waste-




water was further enhanced.









3.   Split Sample Analysis









As demonstrated by the level of confidence experienced by the split




sampling and analysis conducted during these studies, comparable results




can be obtained independently as long as the analytical techniques




employed are equivalent.









                               III-157

-------
4.   Color Load Based on Bleach Plant Production









To eliminate the possibility of inaccurate color load data, which could




be calculated when using the finished mill's production, the bleach




plant was selected as the basis for calculating color load in terms of




kg/kkg (Ibs/ton) of production.  The pulping and bleaching operations




were found to contribute the largest percentage of the total color load




at the 26 pulp and paper mills surveyed.  It therefore was concluded




that basing the color load on the kkg (tons) of pulp bleached per day




would be the method used to calculate color load.  Mills which utilize




fillers, purchased pulp, and/or other types of pulp in the manufacture




of their finished product would have a more representative color load




determination through use of the bleach plant production.









5.   Bleached Kraft Mill Color Origin









The evaluation of the color load identified by source for the 26 bleached




kraft and soda mills resulted in 20 of the 26 mills having 70 to 125




percent of their total color load identified by internal process source.









It was also determined that the major source of color at the 26 mills




was the bleach plant, which contributed an average of 59 percent of the




total mill color.  Of the 59 percent, 80 percent was determined to be




contributed by the first caustic stage extraction in the bleach plant.










                               III-158

-------
The second major source of color was determined to be the screen room or
                                                                     t
decker process.  Approximately 24 percent of the total mill color was

determined to originate at this point in the mill's process.



The pulping, bleaching, and evaporator and recovery processes were

determined to be responsible for an average of 79 percent of the total

color load for the 26 mills surveyed.



6.   Data Comparison by Subcategory and Wood Specie



The evaluation by subcategory and wood specie identified the fact that

pulping and bleaching higher amounts of softwood would increase the

color load produced by a mill.  This was found to be true in 5 of the 7

subcategories.  The two subcategories which did not show this trend were

found to have process differences which altered this pattern.  It was

concluded that without these changes in the normal operations these two

subcategories would have also experienced this result.



7.   Wood Species



As a result of the findings made in the subcategory analysis a more

detailed evaluation of wood specie pulped and bleached versus color load

was undertaken.  The first chlorination, first caustic, and combined

first chlorination and first caustic effluents were evaluated along with

the color load and percent softwood pulp bleached at the secondary
                               III-159

-------
wastewater treatment influent.  The preliminary findings were substan-




tiated and it was concluded that BATEA effluent color limitations based




upon the wood species pulped and bleached would be calculated.









8.   Analysis of Bleaching Sequences









The data evaluated has shown a significant variation in color load




between different bleach plants where similar species were bleached to




corresponding final brightnesses.  An attempt was made to identify these




variations by analyzing bleaching variables for their relative potential




to influence color generation.









Two major bleaching groups were identified, Group A, bleaching with the




CEDED sequence, and Group B which utilized hypochlorite in the bleaching




process.









It was determined that the Group B mills did experience less color than




Group A; however, a statistical analysis of the survey data did not show




any reliable relationship between percent hypochlorite and bleach plant




color.









9.   Internal Parameters Comparison









An evaluation of 10 different internal process parameters was done in an




attempt to identify factors which might cause variations in color




generated.









                               III-160

-------
No substantive correlations between color load generated and the in-




ternal parameters examined were found after a statistical analysis of




all parameters had been performed, although screen room or decker color




load was identified as one of the two major color contributors in the




bleached kraft area, with a trend toward increased color with increased




washer losses.
                               III-161

-------
                              SECTION IV



          LITERATURE AND EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING INFORMATION







The following section will present a literature review on external color



reduction techniques.  Additionally, a discussion of equipment manu-



facturing data from manufacturers of external color control techniques



developed or being developed will be presented.







The information reported in this section will form the basis for iden-



tifying a color control technology representing BATEA in Section V.







A.   LITERATURE SUMMARY


               I




lo   Coagulation and Precipitation







Numerous chemicals have been evaluated by researchers for the coagu-



lation of pulp and paper wastewaters to achieve color reduction.
                                                                   f


Among the chemical coagulants evaluated have been lime,  alum, iron



salts, and fly ash.  With the exception of lime, most of the research



has been done at the laboratory level to determine optimum pH, chemical



dosage, and the,resulting sludge handling characteristics.  In a very



limited number of cases, coagulant addition has been done full scale at



pulp and paper mill treatment systems or in pilot plants.  Iron and



aluminum based precipitants have been employed more extensively in
                             IV-1

-------
Europe, the U.S.S.R., and Japan than in North America where lime has




been the chief coagulant used.









Two treatment systems utilizing an alum color reduction stage (Baikal,




U.S.S.R. and Gulf States Paper in Tuscaloosa, Alabama) were reported in




an earlier EPA document (6).   Raw wastewater color levels at the Baikal




mill averaged 1000 units and the treated effluent 101 units.  Thus, the




overall color reduction approached 90 percent.  Alum dosage (A1203) was




30 mg/1 and a flocculant (polyacrylamide) was fed at a rate of 1 mg/1 to




aid sedimentation.  The Gulf States system included an alum recovery




process which has a projected recovery of approximately 94 percent.  A




Gulf States spokesman has pointed out that the system is still in the




research and development stage until it performs over a sufficient




period to prove its complete practicality.  However, initial results




have shown effluent color levels well below the presently proposed




EPA guidelines for BATEA (1983).  Operating costs, based on 454 thousand




kilograms (kkg) per day or 500 tons/day of production, for the color




reduction portion of the Gulf States' treatment system has been estimated




to be $108.58 total and $68.37 operating cost per million gallons of




effluent treated.  This equals $2.61 total and $1.64 operating cost per




ton of production (7).









Another full scale alum color removal study has been carried out at a




paper mill in British Columbia, Canada (8).  Early trials resulted in
                             IV-2

-------
numerous problems in the process control.  In addition, Freyschuss




reported on one unbleached kraft mill in Sweden which has achieved 90%




color removal with alum dosage of 120 mg/1 (8).  The Degremont Company




of France is developing an alum treatment system similar to the one




being used in Tuscaloosa, Alabama by Gulf States Paper.









Olthof and Eckenfelder used ferric sulfate, lime, and alum to perform




laboratory studies on primary clarifier influent samples from three pulp




and paper mills (9, 10).  Mill I and II produced bleached kraft and




groundwood pulps for the manufacture of newsprint, and Mill III was an




unbleached kraft paperboard mill.  The study sought to determine three




things:  1) optimum pH; 2) optimum chemical dosage; and 3) character-




istics of the resultant sludge.









The optimum pH levels determined were 3.5 to 4.5 on the influent at Mill




I and II using ferric sulfate and 4.5 to 5.5 for Mill III.  The optimum




pH when using alum was determined to be one-half unit higher in each




case, while the optimum pH using lime was 12.0 to 12.5 for all three




mills.  The optimum dosage for each chemical at the three pulp and paper




mills is listed along with the respective percent color reductions on




Table 21.
                             IV-3

-------
                               TABLE 21


                       REQUIRED COAGULANT DOSAGE



           Ferric Sulfate             Alum                    Lime

Mill
I
II
III

Dosage
(mg/1)
500
275
250
Percent
Color
Removal
92
91
95

Dosage
(mg/1)
400
250
250
Percent
Color
Removal
92
93
91

Dosage
(mg/1)
1,500
1,000
1,000
Percent
Color
Removal
92
85
85
Evaluation of the various sludge characteristics indicated that lime


sludge resulted in higher allowable filter loading rates (at least four


to five times higher) and higher percent solids in the filter cake.


However, the advantages of using lime are partially offset by the

                i
resulting larger quantity of sludge to be dewatered relative to the


amounts generated using ferric sulfate and alum.





The authors performed an economic evaluation based upon the results of


the laboratory experiments on the wastewater from the three mills.  The


cost estimated included a solids contact clarifier, vacuum filter, and


the chemicals (polymer and coagulants) required to operate in the optimum


pH range.  Costs were calculated for treatment systems of 1, 5, and 20


million gallons per day.  The results of their cost determination are


shown on Table 22.
                             IV-4

-------
                               TABLE 22

                         COST OF COAGULATION
Effluent
  Flow
 (mgd)
    1
    5
   20
    1
    5
   20
    1
    5
   20
    Ferric
    Sulfate
(c/1000 gal)
      30.6
      24.3
      21.9
      23.5
      17.4
      15.2
      17.6
      13.0
      11.2
                                   MILL I
                                   MILL II
                                   MILL III
     Alum
(C/1000 gal)
      29.2
      22.7
      20.4
      24.8
      17.7
      15.8
      18.4
      13.7
      12.1
     Lime
(C/1000 gal)
      28.4
      21.8
      19.2
      24.3
      17.8
      15.3
      19.8
      16.0
      14.3
It should be noted that the costs are based on 1973 prices, including

capital, operating, and maintenance.  Chemical costs were $50.00 per ton

for ferric sulfate, $52.25 for alum, and $20.00 per ton for lime.



It was concluded that ferric sulfate used for color removal of pulp and

paper mill wastewaters can be an attractive alternative to lime treat-

ment.  The main reason for this conclusion was that the required optimum

dosage of ferric sulfate was 25 to 33 percent that of the optimum lime

dosage.  Another reason which was discussed was the effluent quality

which results when using lime.  Lime treatment results in a high pH and
                             IV-5

-------
a great deal of calcium in solution.  Common practice is to use an




additional treatment step, recarbonation, which will reduce the pH and




recover the calcium as CaC03.  The use of ferric sulfate and alum,




however, does not require this additional treatment step, and depending




upon the buffering capacity of the biological treatment, may not require




any neutralization.  Berov studied the need for neutralization of kraft




mill effluents which were treated with alum for color removal (11).  He




concluded that if the chemically treated process effluent pH did not




fall below 5.8, neutralization was not needed.  As indicated above,




however, this is dependent upon the buffering capacity of the biological




treatment in each case.









Jensen and Meloni studied coagulation with aluminum sulfate, ferrous




sulfate, and fly ash on three wastewater streams from a kraft mill in




Finland (12).  The wastewater streams studied were the pine barking




effluent, screen room effluent, and the alkaline extract from the




bleachery.  The purpose of the study was to test the suitability of




chemical treatment of these wastes to meet effluent guidelines.  Addi-




tionally, the intent was to find a chemical that could be used most




economically.









The color reduction results on all three wastewater streams were in the




range of 80 to 90+ percent.  The range of chemical dosage used for fly




ash was 1,000 to 20,000 mg/1 on all three wastewater streams.  The
                             IV-6

-------
aluminum sulfate dosages were 100 to 500 mg/1 on the barking effluent,

50 to 600 mg/1 for the screening effluent, and 500 to 2,500 mg/1 for the

bleachery effluent.  Ferrous sulfate dosages were 100 to 700 mg/1 for

the barking effluent, 300 to 1,100 mg/1 for the screening effluent, and

1,000 to 3,000 mg/1 for the bleachery effluent.




Optimum chemical dosages for the bleachery effluent with respect to

color removal were over 5,000 mg/1 for fly ash, 1,500 mg/1 for aluminum

sulfate, and 2,500 mg/1 for ferrous sulfate.  These chemical dosages

reduced color to the 2,500 mg/1 level from influent color levels which

were 14,000 to 20,000 mg/1.  This represented color reduction effici-

encies of over 80 percent.  Color reduction over 90 percent was achieved,

but the increase chemical dosage to achieve the additional 10+ percent

removal was significantly higher than the previously mentioned dosages.

Fly ash dosage required went from 5,000 mg/1 for 87 percent reduction to

20,000 mg/1 for 97 percent reduction.  Alum dosage required went from

1,500 mg/1 for 82 percent reduction to 2,000 mg/1 for 96 percent re-

duction.  The ferrous sulfate dosages required went from 2,500 mg/1 for

87 percent reduction to 3,000 mg/1 for 97 percent reduction.  One of the

conclusions arrived at from the study was that fly ash was comparable or

superior to lime as a treatment chemical.




Nasr, Gillies, Bakhshi, and Macdonald performed laboratory studies
               i
utilizing the waste products from a coal-burning electric generating

plant (hydrochloric acid and fly ash) for color removal from a pulp mill

effluent (13).
                            IV-7

-------
The fly ash used in the study had as its major component silica.




Aluminum and calcium were the most abundant cations.   Caustic extraction




filtrate from a bleached kraft pulp mill was the wastewater stream




investigated.  The average color concentration was 12,000 units with pH




of 8.5.  Initial laboratory experiments were performed using untreated




fly ash.  A dosage of 1,000 gm/1 of fly ash was needed to achieve a 51




percent color reduction with the pH increasing to 9.4.








Experiments were then performed to see if the components of fly ash




could be released into solution by treatment with HC1.  The main purpose




of this treatment was to release calcium into solution because of its




effectiveness in chemical precipitation for color removal.  The tests




indicated that 20 mg equivalents of HC1 were required to completely




acidify one gram of fly ash.  Two hours of stirring was required for the




completion of acidification reactions.








An optimum pH of 5 was determined for color removal.   The optimum acidi-




fied fly ash requirement was found to be 1,900 mg/1 which resulted in a




color removal of 98 percent.  Most of the color removal was attributed




to precipitation of colored material by reaction with metal ions released




from the acidified fly ash.  Sludge was found to be voluminous and slow




to settle.  After 12 hours of settling, the sludge occupied 15 percent




of the volume of the effluent.
                             IV-8

-------
The study concluded that due to the quantity of fly ash, dried sludge,




and HC1 needed for acidification purposes, a fairly large materials




handling problem would exist if this treatment were to be utilized on a




full-scale basis.









Dugal, Church, Leekley, and Swanson performed laboratory studies on




color reduction with a combined ferric chloride and lime treatment




system (14).  This study sought to establish conditions for improving




the lime treatment systems by using multivalent ions with the lime for




color precipitation.  Earlier investigations of the lime precipitation




treatment system showed that removal of color using only lime was 85 to




90 percent and that the remaining color bodies had an apparent weight




average molecular weight of less than 400.  Preliminary studies with




multivalent ions and lime showed almost total color removal.









Tests were run in the laboratory on the decker filtrate and caustic




extraction discharge from International Paper Company's mill at Spring-




hill, Louisiana.  Various salts such as barium chloride, ferric chloride,




magnesium hydroxide, and zinc chloride were used in the initial experi-




ments.  Based on data from these initial experiments ferric chloride was




selected for futher analysis.  In general it was determined that tri-




valent ions are 'more effective color removing agents than divalent ions




(See Table 23). '









Twenty-four experiments were run using ferric chloride and/or lime at




various concentrations.  Color removal up to 98.7 percent was attained,
                             IV-9

-------
                                                          TABLE 23
 TREATMENT OK KRAFT EFKLUKNTS WITH  DIVALENT IONS
                                                                        TREATMENT  OK  KRAFT EFFLUENTS WITH TR1VALENT  IONS  (14)
                     Decker  Effluent
                                               Caustic Exrract
                                                                                   Decker Effluent
 Sa 1 t
 concen-
 t ration
_J5B/J__ -

 Mg (Oil) 2

   0
 100
 200
 250
 300
 350
 400
 600
   0
 J.OO
 200
 250
 '100
 350
 400
 600
   0
 100
 200
 250
 300
 350
 400
 600
 800
 1000

 Ca(OH)2

   0
 100
 200
 250
 300
 350
 400
 600
nal
ill

7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8

7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6

7
7
7
7
7
6
6
(,
6
5

-
-
-
-
-
-
-

.2
.4
.5
.8
.0
.0
.1
.0

^ 2
.9
.5
-.5
.4
.3
.2
.0

.2
.3
.2
.1
.0
.9
.7
.4
.2
.7

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Color
Remova 1 ,

	
0
2
5
2
2
7
7

_
2
5
7
12
17
22
45

—
5
16
21
23
26
28
41
42
61

-
-
-
-
-
-
-



.5
.0
.5
.5
.5
.5

—
.5
.0
.5
.5
.5a
.5
.4

_
.0
.7
.7
.3
.7
.3
.2
.5
.2

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Final

a.
a.
8.
8.
9.
9.
9.
9.

a.
6,
6.
6
6.
6
6.
6.

7.
6.
6,
6
6.
6
6
7
7
7
8
10
11
11
1 ]
11
11
12

.2
4
7
9
.0
0
,1
,2

.1
.9
.7
.7
.7
.7
.7
.7

.1
.9
.5
.5
.6
.8
.9
.0
. 1
.1
.6
.3
.3
.6
.7
.8
.9
.1
Color
Remova 1 ,

	
0
6.
11.
11.
11.
12.
22.

	
0
3.
3.
13.
13.
22.
44.

	
0
0
0
+1.
4.
1.
23.
35.
45.

20.
22.
22.
25.
32.
62.
72.



a
4
4
4
0
a



9
9
6
4
9
0





3
1
1
7
9
2

0
5
5
0
5
5
5
Sa 1 1
concen-
tration
mg/1
Alum (Alj
0
100
200
250
300
350
400
600
Fed -,-pll
0
100
200
250
300
350
400
600
FeCi3-PH
0
100
200
250
300
350
400
600










Color
Final Removal ,
j>H %
!
-------
and it was concluded that a synergistic effect between lime and ferric



chloride existed.  Table 24 shows the results of these 24 experiments.






Another flocculation and precipitation process is in full scale opera-



tion in Japan, and being investigated through laboratory studies in



Sweden. The process involves using iron salts and lime to obtain color



removals in the range of 85 to 95 percent (8).   Chlorination and



caustic extraction stage effluents are treated.  Iron metal is first



dissolved in the chlorination stage effluent.  Retention times of 1.5 to



2 hours and temperatures near 50°C are needed to dissolve a sufficient



amount of the metallic iron.  The resulting solution is then combined



with the caustic extract and the pH adjusted within the range of 9 to 10



with lime.  No chemical dosages were listed for the lime required or the
               i


amount of iron metal consumed.






Vincent studied the decolorization of biologically treated pulp and



paper mill effluents by lime and lime - magnesia additions (15). Re-



sultant estimated costs were compared with those of conventional lime



treatment. Studies were conducted in a laboratory on effluents from



three kraft mills, one sulfite mill, and one NSSC mill.  All except one



of the kraft mills had. been subjected to biological treatment before



chemical treatment.






Separate testing with lime and magnesia showed 1,000 mg/1 lime removed



approximately 90 percent of the color; however, magnesia alone proved to
                             IV-11

-------
                                TABLE 24

LIME TREATMENT OF KRAFT BLEACH CAUSTIC EXTRACT IN THE PRESENCE OF METAL IONa (14)
FeCls
mg/1
0
25
50
100
200
300
500
800
0
25
50
100
200
300
500
800
0
25
50
100
200
300
500
800
Lime,
ml
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
Sludge
vol.b
mg/1
6.2
8.2
8.2
8.5
13.3
14.4
22.0
30.1
6.2
7.0
7.3
9.7
14.1
19.1
33.5
62.0
8.9
8.7
9.0
9.4
11.2
12.2
14.3
16.8
Final
PH
11.58
11.50
11.42
11.42
11.49
11.50
11.40
11.32
11.79
11.70
11.70
11.70
11.70
11.71
11.78
11.73
11.98
11.99
11.98
12.00
12.01
12.01
12.01
12.00
Color
Removal ,
%
81.4
81.7
85.7
90.0
91.4
91.6
95.8
95.5
87.2
88.0
89.5
91.8
93.6
95.2
96.8
97.5
93.4
94.9
95.0
95.9
96.3
97.3
98.2
98.7
TOC
Removal ,
%
66.6
66.0
71.0
78.0
76.4
74.3
81.0
83.2
68.6
75.4
73.0
75.2
79.6
81.6
86.0
87.3
80.4
79.5
77.6
81.7
84.0
81.5
87.7
88.7
BOD
Removal
%
6.5
4.3
0.0
12.8
23.5
27.7
36.2
40.5
23.5
23.5
25.5
29.8
34.0
36.2
44.7
51.0
32.0
32.0
38.4
36.2
36.2
46.8
46.8
51.0
 aUntreated caustic extract had a pH of 8.83, a color of 4400 units,
  TOC of 220 mg/liter,  and BOD of 47 mg/liter.

 °Total volume of kraft bleach caustic extract after lime and FeCl3
  addition was 100 ml.  Sludge volumes were measured after a 15-minute
  settling time.
                              IV-12

-------
be ineffective at moderate doses and required 4,000 mg/1 to get approxi-




mately 50 percent color reduction.  Magnesia alone, therefore, could not




be justified because the amount of magnesia had little effect on color




removal.  However, magnesium hydroxide freshly formed in situ was highly




effective when in combination with lime.









The magnesium was added as a soluble salt prior to the lime slurry.   A




dosage of 50 to 100 mg/1 magnesia prior to 500 mg/1 lime gave the same




color removal as 1000 mg/1 of lime alone.  Additionally, the volume of




sludge was less with the lime - magnesia process.   Table 25 shows some




typical results of the lime - magnesia process for removing color, BOD,




COD, and phosphate for the five mills.









Recovery techniques were suggested but none were investigated in con-




nection with this study.  This would indicate additional testing would




have to be done to prove the feasibility of this lime - magnesia re-




covery process before attempting it on a larger scale.  Figure 66 shows




a schematic of the proposed process.









An evaluation concluded that the system is costly, but the benefits




might favor its use.  Costs were estimated for a lime and lime-magnesia




process at a 500 ton per day kraft mill treating a combined effluent of




approximately 24 mgd.  The costs were estimated assuming 1) no recovery,
                             IV-13

-------
                                                                                       TAIILE 25

                                                     REMOVAL OF 1101), COD, AND  1MIUSPI1ATI! AT SELECTED LIME - MAGNESIA  LEVELS (L5)
                                   I'reatmeiU   Tri-a( mc-Ml                 Before  Tro:i tinen t                           After Treatment                	          Removal
II II
A
B
C
EfflmMir- -
CaO MgO
Kraft, combined effluent, 500 100
80% bleached biological
t rea tnu'iiL
Kraft, hi|;h
nnb leached ,
t rea tment
Kraft, conibi
biological L
KOI) stream, 500 100
not biological
ned effluent, 500 100
rea tment
Color BOO1- COD2 Phosphate3 Color BOD COD - -Phosphate Color BOD COf)
2,570 - 420 1.05 137 16 100 -iO.Ol 94.7 - 76
(560)
1,070 130 340 0.7 78 105 580 0.07 92.7 19
(560) 1,310
2,620 60 500 3.0 185 30 100 0.06 92.9 50 80
(720)
Phosphate
99.0
90.0
98.0
 0    SnlfLtii, NH-j base, combined    2,000        400        1,790      60      2,430         0.8            298       67     460       0.07         83.4      -        81         91.3
      effluent, biological                                                    (1,300)
      treatment.


 E    NSSO, combined biological      6,000      3,000       36,300     525      8,640        31.5        12,800      320   1,040       0.80         64.7      39       88         97.5
      L rea Linen t                                                               (4,960)




 BOD determined after i" i ..Lr ration through Reeve-Angel glass filter papers,  and subsequent adjustmen; to pH 7.

^COI) after fi I tral: i on through Keevo-Angf 1  gifts:;  filter papers.   Bracketed  values are for unf i leered effluents.

 Phoypbate anal ys J s (vn lues  in mg/1  of  I*)  by  modi f icd ascorbic acid method.

-------
                                       FIGURE  66
                          A PROPOSED SCHEME  FOR
                       LIME-MAGNESIA  TREATMENT OF
                        COMBINED  KRAFT  EFFLUENT,
            USING  BOO mg/l  LIME  AND  IOO  mg/l  MAGNESIA,
         BASED ON  IOOO  GAL.  OF UNTREATED EFFLUENT (15)
Combined Effluent
  (1000 gal.)
     MgS04

     Soln.
     10 gal.
     (1 Ib. MgO)
Clarifier
1510 gal.
 Filter or
 Centrifuge
                             Ca(OH)2 soln.
                             500 gal.
                             (5 Ib.  CaO)
Decolorized Effluent
     1510 gal.
        Sludge
        (12.7 Ib. day)
                                         Sludge Kiln
                      C02
                                                CaO  (4.83 Ib.)
                                                MgO  (1.02 Ib.)
                                           Slaker
                                        (leach  tank)
                                                              500 gal.
     Effluent  for
     disposal  or
     further treatment
     (may be carbonatei
     to lower  pH if
     required)
        1010 gal.
                           CaO make-up if  required
                                          Filter or
                                          Centrifuge
                                            MgS04
                                            tank
                           H2S04, water,  10 gal.

                           Mg(OH)2 make-up, if
                           required

-------
and 2) recovery of chemicals.  The chemical dosages used to estimate the

cost were 1000 mg/1 of lime for the lime process and 500 mg/1 lime and

50 mg/1 magnesia for the lime - magnesia process.  Tables 26 and 27 give

the cost breakdown.



Electrically induced coagulation has been discussed and studied by

researchers (10, 17).  The theory described by Olthof for utilizing

electrolytic coagulation was that color consists of two fractions, A and

B (10).  Fraction A is composed of large polymers which are amenable to

coagulation, and fraction B consists of smaller lignin degradation

products which are more easily oxidized and thus reduced in color by

chemical means.  Therefore, it was concluded that an electrolytic cell

capable of producing both chlorine and polyvalent metal ions might be

effective in removing color from kraft pulp mill wastewaters.  The
               |

reasoning behind this proposal was that the chlorine would be useful in

reducing color in fraction B and that the polyvalent metal ions would

aid in the coagulation of fraction A.



Herer and Woodward conducted laboratory studies of this electrolytic

coagulation process (17).  The removal mechanisms were found to be

coagulation by hydrated aluminum ions which were brought into solution

by electrolytic dissolution of the aluminum anode.  Bleaching of small
               i
color-causing polymers by chlorine formed by oxidation of chloride ions

at the anode was shown to be improbable.  However, hydrogen bubbles

formed at the cathode aided removal of coagulated polymers by flotation
                             IV-16

-------
                          TABLE 26

    ANNUAL COSTS OF LIME AND LIME-MAGNESIA TREATMENT (15)
           (costs in thousands of dollars - 1974)
          CaO (1000 mg/1)
No Recovery         Recovery of CaO
                     from sludge
                     and effluent
   (1)                   (2)
     CaO-MgO (500-50 mg/1)
No Recovery         Recovery of CaO-MgO
                        from sludge
   (3)
(4)

M
1
H-1
^J



Equipment Capital
Chemical Cost
Direct Operating
Cost
Period Costs
Total Operating
Costs
Direct Operating
Cost per T. pulp
Total Operating
Cost per T. pulp
325
1163
1443
40
1483
8.25
8.47
3500
0
667
444
1111
3.81
6.35
325
866
1096
40
1136
6.26
6.49 '
3500
156
675
444
1119
3.
6.





86
39

-------
                                                   TABLE 27

                             ANNUAL COSTS OF LIME AND LIME-MAGNESIA TREATMENT (15)
                                    (costs in thousands of dollars - 1974)
                                         Supporting Data for Table 26
               CaO - (1000 mg/1)
                 No Recovery  ^
Total
Operating Costs
                    CaO - (1000 mg/1)
                    Recovery from sludge
                       and Effluent
                  CaO-MgO (500-50 mg/1)
                      No Recovery
                     CaO-MgO  (500-50) mg/1)
                     Recovery from sludge
Chemicals
Sludge Disposal
Maintenance
f Utilities
M
OO
Labor
Indirect Labor
Total Direct
Costs
Depreciation
Insurance
Overhead
Total Period
Costs
1163
260
20
0
0
0
1443
33
7
0
40
0
0
210
373
60
24
667
350
70
24
444
866
210
20
0
0
0
1096
33
7
0
40
156
0
210
225
60
24
675
350
70
24
444
1483
1111
1136
1119

-------
action.  Color removal efficiencies of 92 and 99 percent were observed




for chlorination and caustic effluents, respectively.  These removal




rates were attained with an aluminum concentration of 143 mg/1 at a pH




of 4.3 and 230 mg/1 at a pH of 5.1 respectively.  Table 28 shows the




results of the experiments.









An evaluation of the feasibility of the electrocoagulation process




determined that direct electrolytic treatment of kraft bleachery waste




is impractical.  Whether or not an indirect electrocoagulation process




can be made practical depends upon the development of:  1) an electro-




lytic cell capable of energy efficiencies in excess of 50 percent and/or




2) the realization of beneficial reactions or activities which result in




a significantly better quality effluent than can be achieved with conven-




tional coagulation systems.  Figure 67 is a schematic diagram of the




direct and indirect electrolytic processes.  Figure 68 is a diagram of




the electrolytic cell used in the experiments.









Use of lime for coagulation and precipitation has been thoroughly




covered in prior Development Documents and for this reason was not




included except as it related to the studies described.  Other studies




have also dealt with improving the existing lime treatment method of




color reduction.









Nicolle, Shamash, Nayak, and Histed have analyzed ways of improving the




settling characteristics of sludge from lime treatment of first extrac-
                             IV-19

-------
                                                          TABLE 28



                                             SUMMARY OF  EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS (17)
ro
o
Al concen-
Waste tration, mg/1
Chlorination
(17)


Chlorination
(previously reported)


Caustic extraction
(17)



Caustic extraction
(previously reported)


20
38
77
143
27
39
53
106
23
63
129
230
256
29
59
88
118
pH Range
for min.
color
3.0-4.0
4.5-5.5
4.0-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.8-5.5
5.5-6.0
3.8-4.8
3.5-4.5
4.3-5.3
4.5-5.5
5.5-6.5
3.5-4.5
3.8-4.8
4.0-5.0
4.0-5.0
Max. color
removal %
25
82
86
92
69
82
85
87
38
86
97
99
99
22
65
90
98
pH Range
for min.
carbon
3.5-4.0
5.0-6.0
5.0-6.0
4.5-6.0
4.5-5.5
5.0-5.5
4.8-5.5
5.5-6.0
4.5-5.5
3.5-4.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-6.0
3.0-4.0
4.0-4.5
4.5-5.0
4.5-5.5
Max. carbon
removal %
26
59
62
69
32
38
42
52
28
59
85
89
88
25
62
80
85

-------
                                FIGURE  67
                  DIAGRAMS  OF DIRECT AND
     INDIRECT ELECTROLYTIC  PROCESSES (17)
Al Metal
Waste
Electrolyte

Electrical -
  energy
Al Metal
Electrolyte'
Electrical
  energy
Cell
                   Flocculation
                       tank
                             Settling
                               tank
*• Treated waste
•^Sludge
                  PROCESS I-DIRECT ELECTROLYTIC PROCESS
                                           Waste
                     Cell
                      Mixing
                       tank
Flocculation
tank


Settling
tank






                                                                   *-Treated waste
                                                                   *-Sludge
                PROCESS 2-INDIRECT ELECTROLYTIC  PROCESS

-------
                         FIGURE  68
EXPERIMENTAL  ELECTROLYTIC CELL (17)
      Aluminum
       Cathode
                       Alternating Current
                         Voltage Source

                        Variable Isolation
                          Transformer
                          Full Wave
                         Rectifier and
                       Filter Capacitors
                           Voltmeter
                                               Ammeter
Aluminum
 Anode

-------
tion stage kraft bleachery effluent which presently requires massive




doses of lime or addition of fiber to promote settling (18). It was




found that first extraction stage effluent loses its dispersant charac-




teristics if soluble calcium salts are added before the lime. The in-




vestigators discovered that lime dissolved in first stage chlorination




filtrate provides the necessary soluble calcium salts to promote fast




settling of sludge at low lime dosages.









The investigation was divided into two phases.  The first phase objec-




tives were to determine the feasibility of a one clarification stage




lime treatment process and the manner in which it should be carried out.




The objectives of the second phase were to obtain data on the proposed




lime treatment process under continuous operating conditions using mill




effluents to obtain more realistic information on the process and its




actual feasibility.









The results showed that the lime treated waste settled rapidly resulting




in a clear supernatant only when sufficient calcium ions were present in




the system as described above.  Two methods of providing the calcium




ions were analyzed.









First, dissolving some lime in the chlorination effluent prior to the




addition of extraction effluent followed by the bulk lime,  or second, by




adding recycled sludge with the fresh lime to the combined  CD and E]_




effluents.  On the basis of the investigations it was recommended that
                             IV-23

-------
the first method be utilized rather than sludge recycle.  The utiliza-




tion of a sludge return process resulted in approximately a 30 percent




color reduction and 40 percent COD reduction.









The mini pilot lime unit (see Figure 69) was then used in further




studies.  Thirty runs were used in these additional tests.  In runs one




through sixteen, two-thirds of the chlorination effluent and all the




caustic extraction effluent were treated.  Lime additions ranged from




30.4 to 82.6 kg (67 to 182 pounds) of lime per air dried ton of pulp




bleached with four levels of sludge recycle:  0, 32, 50, and 68 percent.




During those runs with zero sludge recycle 13.6 kg (30 pounds) of lime




per air dried ton was added to the chlorination effluent prior to blen-




ding with the extraction effluent and the final dosage of lime.  The




remaining one-third of the chlorination effluent was added to the




treated effluent leaving the clarification unit to reduce its alkalinity.









In runs 17 through 28, one-third of the chlorination effluent was treated




with the extraction effluent added to this treated chlorination effluent.




Lime addition ranged from 34.5 to 87.2 kg (76 to 192 pounds) of lime per




air dried ton and three levels of sludge recycle (Q-j 32, and 68 pjercent)




were studied.  Lime was added to the chlorination effluent when no




sludge was recycled.
                             IV-24

-------
                                        FIGURE  69
                   SCHEMATIC OF  PILOT  PLANT  (18)
           Cd(OH)2
    Ca(OH)

    Water
 Lime
Slurry
 Tank
        g
ob
1


2
>

i
r^
20 l/hr ^
n
1

f
^

i
X 1
1
Heating 1
Unit .
1
1
i
A
                                                     Sludge Recycle
                                                                2.12 l/hr
                                                                 Sludge
                                                                 Bleed
      DASHED LINES INDICATE OPTIONS

-------
In run 29, no lime was added to the chlorination effluent prior to the




addition of the extraction effluent, and no sludge was recycled.  Two-




thirds of the chlorination effluent and all the caustic extraction




effluent were treated, and the remaining one-third chlorination effluent




added to the treated effluent.  The lime addition was 56.3 kg (124




pounds) of lime per air dried ton of pulp.









In run 30, only the caustic extraction effluent was treated with lime,




and all the chlorination effluent was added to the treated effluent.  No




sludge was recycled.  The lime addition was 56.3 kg (124 pounds) per air




dried ton.









Data on some of the 30 runs that were made are shown on Table 29.









2.   Activated Carbon Adsorption









Activated carbon treatment for color reduction has been reported in




previous EPA work.  Many of these studies investigated activated carbon




as an additional treatment step to a mill's existing treatment system.




Some of the more recent work has involved investigations of activated




carbon for treating the more concentrated bleach plant effluent.









The NCASI studied the carbon adsorption of spent chlorination and




caustic extraction stage liquor color and organics on activated carbon
                             IV-2 6

-------
                                                   TABLE 29

                                    ANALYSIS OF TREATED AND FINAL EFFLUENTS (18)
Run Number
Proportion CD Treated
Lime Added to CD Effluent, Ib/T
Total Lime Addition, Ib/T
Sludge Recycle Proportion

Mixing Tank Samples
Initial Settling Velocity, mm/min

Final Effluent Analysis
PH
Color, CPPA Method H5-P,  Pt,  mg/1
Color Removal, Pt, mg/1
% Color Reduction
COD, mg/1
% COD Reduction
Suspended Solids, mg/1
Alkalinity as NaOH, mg/1
Acidity as NaOH, mg/1
Total Carbon, mg/1
Total Organic Carbon, mg/1

Sludge Samples Analysis
Initial Settling Velocity, mm/min
Specific Resistance, 1()9  m/kg
1
2/3
30
68.1
0
19.4
10.54
1050
3280
75.7
973
36.5
52.0
116.0
N.A.
-
—
0.906
30.4
13
2/3
30
153.8
0
13.4
11.31
542
3790
87.5
875
42.9
111.3
-
N.A.
321
286
0.114
19.2
14
2/3
0
152.4
0.32
23.0
10.71
782
3550
82.0
885
42.2
71.3
144.0
N.A.
372
308
2.08
18.4
17
1/3
0
76.2
0.32
14.5
3.77
1650
2680
61.9
1011
34.0
68.7
N.A.
140.0
404
349
1.09
19.1
19
1/3
30
106.2
0
10.6
4.52
1410
2920
67.4
1010
34.1
48.7
N.A.
64.0
372
315
1.43
24.5
26
1/3
0
161.9
0.32
17.7
6.87
1470
2860
66.0
963
37.1
40.0
N.A.
2.0
377
323
2.09
10.4
28
1/3
30
191.9
0
17.3
6.73
1350
2990
68.9
902
41.1
38.7
N.A.
3.2
365
294
2.83
15.4
29
2/3
0
123.8
0
35.4
11.07
920
3420
78.8
913
40.4
144.0
188
N.A.
-
—
2.00
20.0
3.39
3010
1330
30.6
1336
12.8
84.7
N.A.
208.0

-------
(19).  The purpose of the study was twofold:  first, to determine the




reaction mechanisms of colored organic matter separation; second, to




determine those factors controlling color reduction efficiency and




chemically identifying the constituents removed and remaining after




treatment.  A variety of activated carbons were investigated.









One of the findings was that removal of color was aided by a reduction




in the pH of the wastewater being treated.  It was stated that this was




caused by reduced ionization of the colored weak organic acids present




which enhanced their adsorption on the activated carbon.  It was also




found that molecular weight of the organics present was the second major




factor influencing the degree of color reduction.  Color reduction was




found to be associated with removal of the high molecular weight materials.




However, the adsorption capacity of activated carbon displayed a pre-




ferential capacity for the low molecular weight fraction.  Increased




removal of the higher molecular weight fraction could be achieved by




increasing the activated carbon dosage.  Additional findings included




the observation that chemical factors were not decisive in controlling




the overall process of color reduction as was previously concluded.  It




was also observed that when the spent chlorination liquor was in large




excess during the adsorption process or when the liquor was in contact




for a short duration with the activated carbon, a temporary color in-




crease occurred.  This effect was traced to iron and other heavy metals




in the liquor.  The carbon itself was a primary source of metals which




were released during treatment with acid liquors.
                             IV-2 8

-------
Rankin and Benedek tested several powdered and granular activated car-

bons for TOG and color removal using Indulin as a lignin model compound

(20).  They determined that carbon pore size, relative to the molecular

weight of the color bodies, had the major effect on adsorption rate and

capacity.  They concluded that the selection of the type and size of the

carbon was very important in maximizing color removal efficiency.



Gibney wrote a state-of-the-art paper on granular activated carbon

treatment (21).  For a typical adsorption system the wastewater contacts

the carbon bed for 30-60 minutes at flow rates which vary between 0.082 -

0.303 cubic meters per minute per square meter (2-8 gallons per minute

per square foot).  The thermal regeneration technique is better than

nonthermal reactivation of carbon.  Optimal performance of an adsorption
                i
system will depend upon proper pH adjustment and flow equalization.

Pretreatment should be performed if wastewaters containing suspended

solids in amounts exceeding 50 mg/1, or oils and greases in concentra-

tions above 10 mg/1 are present.  Reuse of industrial process water

could make the carbon adsorption treatment process stage economically

justifiable.  In a treatment system designed to produce reusable process

water the carbon adsorption stage would be a polishing step after the

bulk of the impurities have been removed by other treatment.



An EPA-supported pilot plant at Pensacola, Florida has evaluated both

the column granular carbon approach and a multi-stage countercurrent

fine-activated-carbon process (22, 23, 8).  A major objective of this
                             IV-29

-------
pilot plant work has been production of reusable water from unbleached




kraft mill effluent.  An effluent with color levels less than 100 units




and capable of being reused has been attained using dosages of 2.0 kg




(4.5 pounds) of lime and 1.1 kg (2.5 pounds) of carbon per 3.8 cubic




meters (1,000 gallons) of mill effluent.  The effluent initially con-




tained 1,000 color units and 250 mg/1 TOG and BOD.  The treatment system




tested in the four-year pilot plant study was primary clarification,




bio-oxidation, lime treatment, and carbon adsorption in various con-




figurations.  The most economical process was found to involve a low




lime addition followed by carbon adsorption in downflow granular carbon




beds.









Capital costs were estimated for a 37,850 cubic meters per day (10 mgd)




flow from an 726.4 thousand kilogram (800-ton) per day mill in 1974




dollars at $7,000,000, with estimated operating costs of 30c per 3.8




cubic meters (1,000 gallons) or $3.85 per thousand kilograms (2,200




pounds) of production which included credit for reused water (22).









J3.   Activated Alumina Adsorption









A calcium sulfite pulp and board mill located on the Lake of Constance




in Germany was faced with extremely tight discharge requirements (24).




In 1971, the mill started to evaluate all known processes for wastewater




treatment to meet these requirements.  The mill employed research insti-




tutes and consultants experienced in wastewater treatment to evaluate




the various processes.  The following methods of treatment were examined:
                              IV-30

-------
     1.   Single and multi-stage biological purification.




     2.   Coagulation with calcium, iron, and aluminum salts, alone and




          in combination.




     3.   Catalytic oxidation (Katox process).




     4.   Ultrafiltration with tubular and sheet membranes.




     5.   Electrochemical processes.




     6.   Radioactive irradiation.




     7.   Ozonization.




     8.   Adsorption on activated carbon.








Methods 2 through 8 were employed following biological treatment.  These




methods were also evaluated at the pilot plant level.  After three years




of research it was concluded that all of the above processes were imprac-




ticable for this application.  The reasons included poor performance,




processes which resulted in other difficulties (i.e., sludge production),




or in excessive projected cost.









The mill personnel involved in the research had evaluated numerous




adsorbants, mostly inorganic, in earlier investigations.  Activated




alumina (aluminum oxide) had exhibited excellent adsorbance.  The ad-




sorbant was tested with effluent from the pulp mill  (dilute sulfite




liquor), effluent from the chlorination stage, and the combined effluent




from the bleach plant.  The following results were observed:








     1.   The lignin components in the effluent were quantitatively
                             IV-31

-------
          adsorbed by the activated alumina so that the treated water




          had no detectable lignin.




     2.   The treated effluent was completely colorless.




     3.   After adsorption the foaming tendency of the effluent was




          destroyed.




     4.   The materials present in the effluents which were not adsorbed




          were readily destroyed biologically.  They behaved like low




          molecular weight compounds, similar to carbohydrates.








Regeneration of the activated alumina was then studied.  It was deter-




mined that a thermal regeneration by heating the A1203 to 500-600°C in




the presence of air was the process to utilize.  When the bleach plant




effluent pH was adjusted to 2.5 with HC1 before the adsorption step, a




reuse of about 89 times without suffering much loss in adsbrbant capa-




city was achieved.








The ratio of A1203 to effluent (weight/volume) is still uncertain;




however, 10-12 kg A1203 per cubic meter (0.085 to 0.102 pounds per




gallon) of effluent appeared to be the average.  The researchers de-




veloped a laboratory test system which utilized five reactors in series




(four operating, one being regenerated).  To alleviate the problem of




clogging of the activated alumina columns by suspended solids in the




wastewater being treated an upflow "swirling bed" reactor was developed.




Figure 70 is a schematic diagram of the process.  Research into this




process is continuing and a full scale swirling bed reactor has already




been built.
                             IV-3 2

-------
SCHEMATIC
     ALUMINA
               FIGURE. 70
DIAGRAM   OF  THE   GRANULAR  ACTIVATED
 PROCESS  FOF$  COLOR  REMOVAL  (8)
          BLEACHERY
          EFFLUENT
          SETTLING
              UP FLOW COLUMN IN SERIES
                                                            TREATED











I



1











I



f











'



'
EFFLUENT "



                           ROTARY
                            DRUM
                            FILTER
                              INDIRECT HEATED
                                 ROTARY KILN
                                       (500°C)
                                                        REGENERATED
                                                        ALUMINA FOR
                                                        RECYCLE

-------
No attempt was made during the initial studies to estimate a cost for




this treatment process.  Further research will, however, be directed at




establishing the technical requirements of this treatment process for




use in developing a preliminary cost estimate.









The latest reports on the small pilot scale studies being carried out




indicate that almost 100 percent of the color is eliminated with a




requirement of 7 kg ^263 per cubic meter of effluent (8).  Flow rates




of 2-10 cubic meters per square meter per hour (0.8 to 4.1 gpm/sf) are




being attained.  The optimum pH for operation of the columns is approxi-




mately 2.5.  Further evaluations of this process are planned in Germany




and Canada.









4.   Resin Separation and Ion Exchange Processes









The use of adsorption and ion exchange resins for color reduction of




kraft bleachery effluents has undergone extensive research over the past




few years.  Several specialized resins recently developed have offered




improved results over those initially used.  Included among these are




the processes developed by Rohn and Haas, Uddeholm-Kamyr and Dow Chemical.









An estimate of the cost (1974) for the Rohm and Haas process (Figure 71)




at a 635.6 thousand kilogram (700 ton) per day mill for a full scale




system was $1,495,000 in capital cost with an operating cost of $0.77




per thousand kilograms (2,203 pounds) of paper produced (8). Rock has






                             IV-34

-------
                      FIGURE   71
ROHM  AND  HAAS  RESIN  PROCESS
                                                     (25)
                                               HIGHLY COLOURED
                                               SPENT
                                               BLEACHING
                                               LIQUOR
         TO PAPER MACHINES
                 WHITE
                 PULP
           BLEACHING
                                 FILTRATION
           PROCESS
                 BROWN
                 PULP
                        BORROWED CAUSTIC
                         REGENERANT
                                        , AMBERLITE
                                       /   XAD-8
WOOD
CHIPS
PULPING
PROCESS
                         HIGHLY COLOURED
                            SPENT
                          REGENERANT
                                      DECOLOURIZING
                                         PROCESS
   ORGANIC- LADEN
   BLACK LIQUOR
                          RECOVERED
                          MOLTEN
                          CAUSTIC
                                      DISCHARGE  TO STREAM
            CAUSTIC
           RECOVERY
            FURNACE
                                      85 %  DECOLOURIZED
                                           BOD. REMOVED
         BURNED
         ORGANICS
          DISCHARGE TO AIR
       CARBON DIOXIDE & WATER
                                    DECOLOURIZED
                                    BLEACHING
                                    LIQUOR

-------
estimated the capital cost in December 1973 dollars at $940,000 for a




full scale process at a 635.6 thousand kilogram (700 ton) per day mill




(25).  More recent cost estimates (1975) for an 726.4 thousand kilograms




(800 ton) per day mill were $900,000 for capital cost and $0.72 per




thousand kilograms (2,203 pounds) of pulp for the operating cost.









Two methods for regeneration have been proposed for the Rohm and Haas




process.  First, using the mill white liquor stream no soda loss would




result, but 1.3 to 5 percent additional evaporator capacity would be




required.  Second, regeneration using the weak wash stream would require




no increase in the evaporator capacity, but soda make-up would be required.




White liquor regeneration is the more economical process (25).  Two




potential disadvantages of the Rhom and Haas process are that low pH




(2.5) is required for optimum efficiency and a buildup of chloride in




the pulping process water could occur.  Chloride accumulation, however,




is claimed to be at sufficiently low levels to produce no pulping and/or




recovery system problems.  The process treats a combined caustic extract-




chlorination bleaching effluent.









The Uddeholm-Kamyr process (Figure 72) which is in full scale operation




at a 272.4 thousand kilogram (300 ton per day) mill in Sweden and also




in Japan, is apparently based upon a weak anionic type resin which




appears to utilize adsorption and ion exchange mechanisms for color




removal.  The first caustic extraction stage is the stream treated.




Kamyr, Inc. in the United States is presently using a 76.0 liters (20
                             IV-36

-------
                             FIGURE   72
    UDDEHOLM- KAMYR  RAISIN  PROCESS
                             (27)
BLEACHERY
EFFLUENT

  FILTRATION
  FOR
  SUSPENDED
  SOLIDS
  REMOVAL
   REGENERANT
   (4-8% NaOH)
ION
EXCHANGER
                               RECOVERY
                               FURNACE
                    EVAPORATOR
                            ELUATE ON
                            REGENERATION
                                           BLACK
                                           LIQUOR
                     DECOLOURIZED
                       EFFLUENT

-------
gallon) per minute mobile pilot plant to collect operational data on the




system at several North American mills.  Chloride buildup and a required




2 to 3 percent increase in evaporator capacity are the potential draw-




backs related to this process.  No capital costs are available, but an




estimated operating cost of $0.99 per thousand kilograms ($0.90 per ton)




of pulp based upon the experience with the Swedish process has been.made




(8).








Komori studied color removal using activated carbon and 5 polymeric




adsorbants (26).   He found that the polymers were equal or superior to




activated carbon for color removal.  Regeneration was done using alka-




line solutions.









Chamberlin, Kolb, Brown, and Philp with Dow Chemical Company reported on




a polymeric resin process for reducing the color in bleach plant first




chlorination and caustic stage filtrates (28).   The technology has been




field tested at a 590.2 kkg/day (650 TPD) bleached kraft softwood mill




utilizing a mini-pilot plant consisting of two columns, one-half cubic




foot per column.   A diagram of the unit is shown on Figure 73.  Recently




a new group of polymeric resins which are able to function over a wide




pH range have been developed by Dow Chemical Company and field tested at




the mini-pilot plant (29).








The influent wastewater streams to the mini-pilot plant contained color




levels in a range from 9,000 to 12,000 mg/1 with the average being
                             IV-38

-------
                      FIGURE  73
   DOW  CHEMICAL  COLOR   REDUCTION

           MINI- PILOT   PLANT  UNIT
                           (28)
             Caustic
                      Sewer
NOTE-  INFLUENT  PASSED THROUGH  SAND  FILTERS
        AND  A CHARCOAL  BED
        COLUMNS  ALTERNATE  BETWEEN  SORPTION
        AND  REGENERATION  MODES

-------
10,500 mg/1.  After three hours, at a flow rate of 7.5 bed volumes per




hour, 85, 92, and 84 percent total accumulated color reduction was




observed for pH's of 7.0, 5.4, and 4.0, respectively.  No costs for the




system were developed.









5.   Membrane Processes









Ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, dialysis, and electrodialysis are all




processes utilizing membranes to accomplish wastewater treatment.  The




basic differences between the processes are membrane permeability and




driving force.  Dialysis and electrodialysis utilize membranes which are




mainly permeable to ions.  The driving force through the membrane for




the dialysis process is the difference in concentration of ions across




the membrane, while the driving force for the electrodialysis process is




an electrical potential difference.









Dialysis requires a solution downstream of the membrane to be much more




dilute than the influent stream being treated.  Therefore, dialysis is




not used to any great extent for treating pulp and paper process streams




and effluents where large flow rates of solutions have to be processed




(30).









Ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis (hyperfiltration) rely on an external




pressure to provide the driving force.  Both of these processes can




utilize membranes which are permeable to molecules of a specific size.
                             IV-40

-------
Ultrafiltration has been the subject of pilot plant studies at Champion




International Corporation in North Carolina.  Effluent streams treated




included decker and pine bleachery caustic extraction filtrates.




Results of these studies and others have been reported in an earlier




EPA document (6).  A flow diagram of the process used in these studies




appears in Figure 74.  Plugging of the membrane cartridges by residual




particles and membrane cartridge life have been the two major problems




identified through these studies.








Investigation of a related system was carried out by International Paper




Company in cooperation with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and with




EPA support (32).  Dynamically formed membranes composed of zirconium,




silicone oxides, and polyoculate were investigated for possible color




removal from caustic extraction and pulp washing effluents.  It was




determined that dynamically formed membranes decreased the plugging




problem and lengthened the life of the membrane.  The salt reduction is




also improved when using dynamically formed membranes.  Laboratory




tests, primarily on kraft effluents, were performed with these new




membranes.  It was determined that ultrafiltration was probably a better




alernative than reverse osmosis when using dynamically formed membranes




for treating bleach plant effluents.  The organic concentrate would be




directed to the recovery system and the inorganic-rich stream discharged




or treated to recover process chemicals.  Observed color removal effic-




iencies were generally above 95 percent.








The researchers concluded that although the results of the laboratory




tests were good, more work would be necessary to establish the technical
                            IV-41

-------
                         FIGURE  74
ULTRAFILTRATION  FLOW DIAGRAM  (3D
      Reusable
      Permeate
                    Effluent  Stream
                          O-«	pH Adjustment
                        Filter
                       Polishing
                        Fifter
                        Feed
                      Reservoir
                    Ultrafiltration
                        Cells
                          r
                    Solids Disposal
Incinerator
                       Vent to
                     Atmosphere
                                                        Gas
                                                     Scrubber

-------
feasibility of applying dynamic membrane filtration techniques to kraft




wastewater.  Preliminary cost estimates were performed based on the




laboratory work and previous cost estimates from a desalinization pro-




cess.  It was estimated (1974) that the treatment cost would be 5.3
-------
                                FIGURE  75


             ULTRAFILTRATION  PILOT PLANT


                    FLOW  DIAGRAM  (33)
Alkaline extraction effluent
   from filter drum
               Screen


              100 mesh
     Rejects
                                                    PRV


                                                   •IX-
                          150 gallon

                           Feed tank
                          Heating coil
                                       •ex-
                                        FRV
                                         Pump
                                 Drain valves
Ultra-

filter
                                                              Permeate sewered
                                               LEGEND



                                               PI   =  Pressure indicator

                                               PRV =  Pressure regulation valve

                                               FRV =  Flow regulation valve

-------
Initial trials with the pilot plant encountered difficulties in the form




of coating or fouling of the membrane surface.  High velocities for




eliminating or minimizing these problems were attempted; however, resi-




dual fouling was still encountered.  The use of a daily wash became the




final solution to the problem.  The contents of the wash water required




was not specified.  Results from the pilot plant work were similar to




those levels of removal attained in the laboratory work.  It was also




shown that the sodium and chloride rejection measured was negligible,




which is important when considering recycling the concentrate to the




recovery plant.









An improved polymeric membrane, which has increased resistance to




chemicals and temperature, has been developed for use in future pilot




plant work.  The researchers feel that color removal should reach 80




percent without a decrease in flow rate when the new membrane is tested.









Pels, et. al. studied ultrafiltration at the laboratory level (34).




Prefiltered bleach kraft mill effluent was used along with five dif-




ferent sized molecular weight cutoff membranes.  The membranes were made




of cellulose acetate.  It was concluded that ultrafiltration provided




good removal of color, COD, and BOD.  A molecular weight cutoff of




10,000 appeared to be the most effective in terms of removal efficiencies.




A preliminary cost estimate based upon this laboratory work indicated




relatively high costs for the ultrafiltration process.  A capital invest-




ment in the range of $20 to $50 million for a 454 thousand kilograms
                            IV-45

-------
(500 ton) per day mill with an operating cost of about $0.26 per cubic




meter (264.2 gallons).  Exactly what was included in the estimated costs




did not appear in the referenced article.









Studies of reverse osmosis for color removal have been reported in an




earlier EPA document (6).  Reverse osmosis utilizes membranes which




reject lower molecular weight solutes; however, lower flux rates occur




along with a need for higher operating pressure differences across the




membrane than those experienced with ultrafiltration.









The research at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, described previously,




also evaluated reverse osmosis (hyperfiltration) treatment of brown-




stock washer, decker, and screen-room effluents as well as bleach plant




effluents (32).









The reverse osmosis process utilized a dual-layer membrane, prepared by




exposing a hydrous oxide sublayer to a solution containing poly (acrylic




acid) at low pH.  This type of membrane, which has rejection properties




expected of a polyacrylate cation-exchange membrane, has appeared promising




for desalination of brackish water.









Initial tests were carried out on the brown-stock decker effluent to see




if reverse osmosis could effectively concentrate the effluent to make




recovery by evaporation, or reuse of the filter practical.  The reverse




osmosis treatment of the simulated brown-stock water was carried to
                            IV-46

-------
approximately 85 percent water recovery.   The permeate which resulted

appeared adequate for reuse for example,  in the bleach plant.   It was

also noted that the concentrate approached the concentration necessary

for returning to the evaporator, along with the weak black liquor, for

eventual chemical recovery.  Figure 76 shows the rejection (percent),

flux rate, and the concentration of contaminants in the permeate which

resulted from the tests on the brown-stock water.   The tests were

conducted at a pressure of 950 psig, a temperature of 43°C,  and a pH of

7.7 to 8.6.



The reverse osmosis process was then used to treat a caustic extraction-

stage effluent, adjusted to the experimental pH values with chlorination

stage bleach plant effluent and with mixed bleach plant effluents.  The

membranes produced a permeate suitable for recycle; however, the concen-

trate contained so much chloride that its introduction into the kraft

recovery system would be impractical.  Table 30 shows the percent rejec-

tion, concentrate, and permeate levels which resulted from these tests.



                               TABLE 30

             REVERSE OSMOSIS OF BLEACH PLANT EFFLUENT (32)


                         Observed Rejection %     Concentrate         Product

Color                          99.9               9000-45,000           5-35
Pt-Co Units

Total Carbon                   94-97               775-3200            25-100
mg/1

Chloride                       80-90              1000-5000           150-1000
mg/1


                            IV-47

-------
                                         FIGURE   76

                    REVERSE  OSMOSIS OF SIMULATED

                    BROWN-STOCK  WASH EFFLUENT

                                                (32)
    Z
    o
    o
    UJ
    a:

    a
    UJ
    >
    o:
    UJ
    en
    m
    O
    o
    •a
	«w _.	
     o
     01
                20
40
60
80
100
                WATER RECOVERY,  %
20     40     60     80     100

WATER  RECOVERY, %
          Legend


          o   0.27#m  Selos tube  at I9ft/sec

          A  0.45 /4m  Acropor at 15 ft/sec

-------
A preliminary estimate of the treatment cost per 3.8 cubic meters (1,000




gallons) for a 3,785 cubic meters (10" gallon) per day reverse osmosis




unit was $0.30.









Timpe and Lang (paper presented in May?1973) concluded in a comparison




of various techniques for removal of color from kraft mill effluents




that reverse osmosis was uneconomical (35).  However, development of new




types of membranes and other technical improvements have made the reverse




osmosis process more feasible.








Nelson, Walraven, and Morris reported on the installation of a reverse




osmosis process at a neutral sulfite semi-chemical pulp and paperboard




mill in Green Bay, Wisconsin, which produces about 267.9 thousand kilo-




grams (295 tons) of paperboard daily (36).  The reverse osmosis process




was incorporated as a balancing control function in the total mill reuse




system  (see Figure 77).  The operation was designed to maintain the




total volume of the recirculating excess white water within the limits




of system volume by the removal of high quality permeate.  Forty-five




days operating data indicates a color removal over 99 percent and 8005




removal over 98 percent.  The permeate quality has exceeded the level




called  for in the specifications.  Twenty-four modules failed during the




period with two-thirds of the failures blamed on manufacturing problems




and not on the design or exposure to the feed stream.  It was concluded




that the problems with the modules could be resolved.






                            IV-49

-------
                                              FIGURE:  77
                  PLANNED  WATER   RE-,USE   SCHEMATIC  (36)
        Unclarified Water From Machine
•iiiiiiiin  Unclarified Water Re-Use

        Unclarified Water Spill Storage Loop

        Clarified  Water
                 -To Machine Showers
                 Re-Use-
                        Permeate
                         Water
       Surge
                                  Spill
                                Storage
Surge
                                                                                -^

                                                                                I
                    Filter
                 (Thickener)
Returned Solids
                       iiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiini
                                                               iniikiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit-

-------
Bansal reported on an improved design membrane called the "sand matrix"




module which was developed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (37).




The membrane, which is a proprietary formulation with a cellulose




acetate base plus several chemical modifiers, is drop-cast into the




support tubes as a liquid, then cured to the design characteristics.   It




is stated that the membrane support structure can stand much higher




elevated temperatures of 55°C to 65°C and pressures of 750 psig to 900




psig.









Two basic types of laboratory experiments were conducted with this




membrane.  First, the performance of the membrane when using a fixed




feed composition produced by the continuous recycle of both permeate and




concentrate to the feed tank was investigated.  Second, the effect of




variations in feed composition on the performance of the system by




recycling only the concentrate to the feed tank was evaluated.  The




study was made to determine if reverse osmosis could be used to purify




the caustic extraction effluent from a bleached kraft mill using a CEDED




bleaching sequence.  The purpose of the study was twofold:  1) to recover




90 percent of the water with a 75 percent or higher recovery of sodium




chloride in the reverse osmosis concentrate; and 2) to recycle the




reverse osmosis permeate to the bleach plant.  The pH of the feed liquor




was not adjusted prior to the reverse osmosis system and it varied




between 7.1 and 9.6.  The overall flux rates averaged 26.5 and 31.6




gallons per day per square foot at 750 psig and 900 psig, respectively,




for the two trials.
                             IV-51

-------
The final permeate was colorless and it was stated that it could be




considered of excellent quality for recycle to the bleach plant.  It was




also noted that reverse osmosis techniques appeared to offer a feasible




approach to closing up kraft bleach plants, but that there are practical




limitations to the degree to which permeate recycle could be practiced.




This was because of a build-up of adverse temperature, pH, viscosity,




and the concentration of suspended solids, soluble components, pitch,




fearners, colors, etc.  Recovery of sodium chloride from the reverse




osmosis concentrate is possible through one of two methods: 1) freeze




concentration, or 2) vacuum evaporation.  A flow sheet for a reverse




osmosis process treating caustic extraction kraft bleach effluent at an




assumed typical 362.8 thousand kilograms (400 ton) per day bleached




kraft mill using 7571 cubic meters (2 million gallons) per day of water




appears on Figure 78.








The report concluded by pointing out that the economics of the process




are dependent to a large extent upon the life expectancy of the membrane




modules, as well as upon the membrane performance in terms of flux rates




and solute rejection. It was noted that newer type membrane modules may




be close to reaching the life expectancies and throughput rates required




for continuous commercial operations.








Gellman observed that a tentative cost estimate for a reverse osmosis




process of $0.82 per 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) of water treated




(1972) from caustic bleach effluent had been reported (38).  He noted,
                            IV-52

-------
                           FIGUR,E  78
TYPICAL   REVERSE  OSMOSIS   PROCESS
      FOR  A  4OO  TPD  PULP   MILL  (37)
                    Pulp Mill
                    400 tpd
                                              0.0125 mgd Fresh-
                                              Water Makeup
                              2.0 mgd
              Bleach Plant Recycle  Loop
              Recycle  at 5000 gal/ton Pulp
              Recycle  1.0 to 1.5 mgd
              at 0.5-  1.0%  Dissolved  Solids
                  0.5 - 1.0 mgd
                  1.0-0.5% Solids
                      i
              Reverse Osmosis
                 0.05 - 0.10 mgd
                 10-5% Solids
             Vacuum  Evaporation
             or Freeze
             Concentration
                  0.0125 mgd
                  40% Solids
                                        0.45-0.90 mgd
                                        Clean Water
0.037-0.087 mgd
Clean Water
            Disposal or Recovery
            of  Salts and  Organics
                      T
                 25 tpd
                 40 - 60% NaCI

-------
however, that the process costs were apparently quite sensitive to




membrane module replacement and maintenance charges, to membrane permea-




tion rates, and to increases in osmotic pressure as concentration




increases.









Balhar studied reverse osmosis for treating pulp and paper effluents and




determined that pressures from 570 to 1,200 psi would be needed to con-




centrate effluents containing liquors and bleachery effluents (39).









6.   Flotation Process









Flotation processes, sometimes called adsorptive bubble separation




processes, include microflotation, precipitate flotation, and ion




flotation.









Haye and Munroe studied a dispersed air flotation process for color




removal utilizing alum and polyelectrolytes (40).  Tests were conducted




using a laboratory scale "mini-plant" capable of operating on a con-




tinuous flow basis (see Figure 79).  The retention time in the "mini-




plant" was 56 minutes.  Chemical dosages were 300 mg/1 for alum and 0.6




to 3 mg/1 of a synthetic, high molecular weight, cationic polyelec-




trolyte.  The optimum pH was found to be between 6.5 and 7.0, which




resulted in color reductions ranging from 83.5 to 95.5 percent.









Preliminary costs were estimated  (1974) for treating the total effluent




from a 681 thousand kilograms (750 tons) per day mill (25 mgd) with 300
                             IV-54

-------
                                         FIGURE  79
SCHEMATIC  OF   DISPERSED  AIR  FLOTATION  "MINI - PLANT"(4O)
                                                                          Air
         Sludge
         Draw- off
                                                                                     	  Feed
                                             Polyelectrolyte    *

-------
mg/1 of alum and 2 mg/1 of a polyelectrolyte.  The chemical cost esti-




mate was $4.30 per ton of production.  Development of an alum recovery




system would reduce the chemical cost and improve the feasibility of




this process.









The researchers recommended that a pilot plant be constructed and




operated to obtain more data, and that the pilot plant work should




evaluate the following:









     1.   Economic factors:  plant cost, chemical costs, and manpower.




     2.   The efficiency of the dispersed air flotation system compared




          to partially pressurized dissolved air system.




     3.   Design parameters:  cell types, lamillar inserts, controls,




          and residence time.









Das investigated floating of the precipitate formed by using amine (up




to 500 mg/1 dosage) with dispersed air flotation (41).  He found color




removal difficult to achieve with this process.








Ion flotation has been found to offer a more attractive process for




color removal.  The process consists of adding a cationic surfactant to




the effluent containing the soluble anionic lignin.  An isoluble pre-




cipitate is formed and is transported to the surface by the passage of




air through the solution.  The resulting froth layer is then removed.




Initial research conducted by Herschmiller showed that 95+ percent color
                            IV-56

-------
removal could be attained (42).   Chan, Herschmiller,  and Manolescu




continued the research to establish whether or not a  technical basis




existed for further development of the process, and to develop pre-




liminary costs (43).









The effluent tested was combined bleach plant effluent which contained




approximately 2,000 Pt-Co color units.  The bleaching sequence employed




at the kraft mill was CEDED.  A schematic diagram of  the laboratory




experimental appartus is shown in Figure 80.









Experiments were also run using the caustic extraction stage effluent




only.  This effluent contained over 20,000 color units.  Solution pH was




adjusted to 3.0 and 5.0 with hydrochloric acid prior  to the flotation




experiments.  Surfactant dosages of 1.20 and 2.80 grams per liter at pH




of 3.0 resulted in color removals of 56 and 86 percent, respectively.  A




dosage of 4.00 grams per liter yielded only 52 percent color removed at




pH 5.0.









Initial experiments on the combined effluent dealt with pH and air




sparger size and their effect on color removal.  Figures 81 and 82 show




the results of these initial experiments.  The results indicate that




using a fine air sparger at a pH from 2.0 to 5.0 would result in color




removal of 95+ percent.









Tests were then conducted to determine the effect of  pH and time on the




percent flotation recovery.  The volume of the experimental ion flotation
                            IV-57

-------
                                      FIGURE   8O
                 SCHEMATIC   DIAG.RAM. OF THE  ION
         FLOTATION  EXPERIMENTAL  APPARATUS  (43)
       Speed
      Controller
  Vacuum  Train
   Pressure
   Regulator
Compressed
Air
Cylinder
                                                      Funnel
                                Rotameter
                   Pressure
                   Regulator
V
                                          X Valve
                                                        Manometer
                                                                         Motor
                                LAJ
                                     Stirrer
Flotation
Cell
                                                                                    Diffuser
                                       Rubber
                                       Bung
                                                                              — DX
                                                                                      Sample
                                                                                      Line

-------
                                       FIGURE   81

          EFFECTS  OF  pH  ON  COLOR   REMOVAL.   (43)
      100
      80
CD
o>
tc.
 o
 o
O
0)
o

I
      60
40
                Dosage =  0.442gm/l

                Fine  Sparger
      20
                  2.0
                      3.0
4.0         5.0


   pH
6.0
7.0

-------
                                    FIGURE  82

       EFFECTS  OF  pH  ON  COLOR   REMOVAL (43)
o
O
0)
     100
      80
      60
40
      20
                Dosage = 0.480gm/l

                Medium Sparger
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
                                                                 7.0
                                                                                  8.0
                                          pH

-------
apparatus was 2.5 liters.  A surfactant dosage of 0.4 grams per liter at




an air flow of 2.5 ml per second and a fine air sparger were used during




the tests.  It was determined that a pH of 5 and 40 minutes retention




resulted in an optimum flotation recovery of 95+ percent.









The experiments then sought to determine the optimum surfactant dosage




at a pH of 5.0.  The optimum dosage was found to be 0.52 grams per liter




with a resulting color reduction of 98 percent (see Figure 83).  It was




also determined that flotation recovery exceeded 90 percent in 10 minutes




producing a treated effluent of less than 100 color units.  The optimum




dosage at pH of 3.0 and 5.0 for flotation recovery was then determined




to be approximately 0.5 to 0.55 with a resulting recovery of 95+ percent




(see Figure 84).









The optimum air flow rate for color removal and flotation recovery was




then determined.   This optimum air flow rate was found to be 2.5 ml per




second at 20°C and 1 atm.  Air flow rates below this level were insuf-




ficient to effectively float the suspended solids; above this rate,




excess turbulence hindered the flotation operation (see Figure 85).









Based upon color reduction of the bleach plant first caustic extraction




stage effluent of a 681 thousand kilogram (750 tons) per day mill, pre-




liminary chemical cost estimates were calculated to be approximately $30




per 908 kilograms (ton) of production (based upon surfactant Aliquat




221).  This high cost made it extremely important to determine a surfac-




tant recovery process to make the ion flotation economically feasible.
                             IV-61

-------
                                           FIGURE   83

PERCENT  COLOR   REMOVAL.  VS.   SURFACTANT  DOSAGE  (-43)
             100
             80
        (0
        o

        i
        o
        o
        U
        0)
        o

        I
60 —
40
             20 —
                          .1
pH
                                 .3         .4

                                  gm/ I
             .5
.6

-------
                                       FIGURE   84


   DOSAGE  VS.  PERCENT   FLOTATION  RECOVERV  (43)i
     100
     80
o
o
d>
JO

"a

75

ul



1
o
60
40
     20 —
                  I
                        I
                 0.2        0.4


                   Dosage  (gm / I)
                                  0.6
0.8
                                                                    O  pH =  5

                                                                         Airflow '
                                     2.5 ml /sec.
                                                                    A   pH =3

                                                                         Airflow = 1.5 ml/sec.
                                                                              Fine  Sparger

-------
                                    FIGURE  85
PERCENT   FLOTATION   RECOVERY  VS.  AIRFLOW  (43)
     100
o>
cc
CO
35
u.
0)
S
0)
0.
     80
60
40
     20
              A-A-
                 2.0         4.0        6.0

                       Airflow   (ml/sec.)
                                            8.0
O  Flotation  Recovery

/\  Colour  Removal
                                                                 pH = 5.0
                                                                 Dosage = 0.4gm/l
                                                                 Fine  Sparger

-------
Studies into a recovery process within the time frame of this investi-




gation were inconclusive; however, it was concluded that most of the




chromophoric compounds in kraft pulp mill effluents can be removed by a




flotation process using cationic surfactants as collecting agents.  The




major process variables of ion flotation were found to be surfactant




dosage, pH, sparger porosity, air sparger rate, and temperature.  Aliquat




221, a commercial surfactant, available in bulk quantity at compara-




tively low cost from General Mills Chemicals, Inc., was found to be very




effective for color removal.









Optimum conditions for flotation using this surfactant was found to be a




dosage of 500 mg/1 and a 3.0 - 5.0 pH range.  Under these conditions a




95+ percent color reduction is possible with residual colors less than




100 Pt-Co units and very little turbidity.









The researchers proposed a possible ion flotation scheme for color




reduction of the kraft mill effluent.  Figure 86 is a diagram of this




proposed ion flotation process.









Further investigations to develop an economical surfactant recovery




process or formulate a very inexpensive surfactant were recommended.  It




was also recommended that the possibility of utilizing ion flotation for




both effluent color and suspended solids removal be investigated.
                            IV- 6 5

-------
                             FIGURE
             PROPOSED  ION  FLOTATION  FOR
      KRAFT  MILL  EFFLUENT  DECOLORIZATION . (43)
                        Surfactant
Effluent
                    Scum
              Flotation
              Cell
 Decolourized  Effluent
                           Colorized
                           Caustic
Surfactant
Storage
                                                          Solvent
                                                         Separator
                                                                     n
                                                                     o


-------
7.   Ozone Treatment









Pilot plant studies on ozone application for color reduction undertaken




by Bauman and Lutz (44) were reported in a previous EPA document  (6).




Operating costs listed in that document to achieve a specific range of




color in the effluent were based on $0.25 per pound of ozone applied.




Table 31 shows these estimated operating costs.









                               TABLE 31




                   EXTRAPOLATED OPERATING COSTS (44)






    Color of              Ozone          	Operating Costs
Ozonated Effluent
300 - 450
250 - 350
150 - 200
125 - 175
Applied (mg/1)
10
20
30
40
Yearly
$121,500
$243,000
$364,500
$486,000
Per Ton of Pulp
$0.675
$1.35
$2.03
$2.70
Nebel, Gottschling and O'Neill all with Welsbach Ozone Systems Corpora-




tion conducted laboratory studies of color removal with ozone on four




different effluents (45).  Two effluents were from kraft pulp and paper




mills (Mills A and B) producing fine papers, one was from a bleached




board mill (Mill C), and one was from a paperboard mill using 100 percent




wastepaper (Mill D).









The investigators briefly reviewed the three types of ozone generation




systems available.  These three systems are shown on Figure 87.
                             IV-67

-------
                      FIGURE   87
OZONE  GENERATION  SYSTEMS  (45)





Air
All














1 	 »P

>x
( } t-
^r 1
fc ,i
L







i — i


j


^






I













I









Air












S*\ A *
u + A i r

To Process


 Filter    Compressor    Coolers
       Driers
    Ozonator
                   OZONE  FROM  AIR
uxygen From
Liquefaction
Plant



o3*o

Reaction
Vessel



                                                      02 To
                                                      Other
                                                      Process
                     Ozonator
      OZONE  FROM  ONCE-THROUGH  OXYGEN
                 Catalytic
             Combustion Unit
                          Heater
                                      il xHeat Exchanger
                                               Water Seal
                                                         02
                                               From Process
           d
1


1

I
°t*
k


°3+02 ,
To Process
Compressor     Coolers
Driers
Make-up
  00
Ozonator
         OZONE  FROM  RECYCLED  OXYGEN

-------
The effluent levels desired were 100 color units for Mill A, 200 color

units for Mills B and C, and 50 color units for Mill D.  Figure 88 shows

the laboratory equipment used in the investigations.  Mill A required 70

mg/1 of ozone to accomplish the desired color level in the effluent.

Table 32 shows the effluent properties before and after ozone treatment

for Mill A.
                               TABLE 32

           FINAL EFFLUENT PROPERTIES ACHIEVED AT MILL A (45)
                                   Effluent Properties     Removal
                                   Before        After
Color, APHA units

COD, mg/1

Total bacteria count
  per 100 ml

Total coliform bacteria
  count per 100 ml

PH
    520

    298


240,000


 24,000

    5.0
  100

  188


4,900


1,600

  6.7
81

37


98


93
Mill B required 81 mg/1 on ozone to accomplish the desired color level

in the effluent.  Table 33 shows the effluent properties before and

after ozone treatment for Mill B.
                            IV-69

-------
                                FIGURE   88    ...
LABORATORY   OZONIZATION   APPARATUS  (45)
                        Effluent  In
                                     Effluent
                              Plexiglas Column
                           (15 Gal. Cap. Approx)
                         o
                     o   o   o
                         o
                         o
Ozone
Generator
                           •Ozone Line
                                                                  Off Gas
                                                                         Vent
                                  K I  Trap
                                                         	T  Sample
                                                         =t>V  Valve
                         Porous
                     /"Diffuser
                                                              Drain
                                                              , Valve

-------
                               TABLE 33

              EFFLUENT PROPERTIES ACHIEVED AT MILL B (45)


                                   Effluent Properties     Removal
Before
900
950
248
After
200
479
176
(%)
78
50
29
Color, APHA units

Turbidity, JTU

COD, mg/1
Mill C required 143 mg/1 of ozone to achieve the desired color level in

the effluent.  Table 34 gives the effluent properties for Mill C before

and after ozone treatment.



                               TABLE 34

              EFFLUENT PROPERTIES ACHIEVED AT MILL C (45)
                                   Effluent Properties     Removal
                                   Before        After
Color APHA units                    1,600          200        88

Turbidity, JTU                        620          207        67

COD, mg/1                             275          217        21

BOD, mg/1                             147          124        16

Total bacterial count
  per 100 ml                  130,000,000    1,180,000        99

Fecal streptococci bac-
  teria count per 100 ml               40            0       100
                            IV-71

-------
The.recycled board mill (Mill D) required 29 mg/1 of ozone to achieve

the desired color level in the effluent.  Table 35 shows the effluent

properties before and after ozone treatment at Mill D.
                               TABLE 35


            EFFLUENT PROPERTIES AT RECYCLED BOARD MILL (45)
                   t


                                   Effluent Properties     Removal
Color, APHA units

Turbidity, JTU

COD, mg/1

Total coliform bacteria
  count per 100 mg
Before
170
230
67
After
50
85
33
(%)
71
63
51
20,700
99.9
Based upon these laboratory studies and the results shown on Tables 32

through 35, daily ozone requirements were calculated for each of the

four mills.  The kilograms of ozone per day required at each of the

mills is shown on Table 36.


                               TABLE 36

                     DAILY OZONE REQUIREMENTS (45)
                                                  Effluent Flow   Daily Ozone
     Initial Color Color Desired   03 Dosage          Rate        Requirements
Mill  APHA Units    APHA Units   Required (mg/1)  m^/d     (mgd)   kg     (Ibs)
A
B
C
D
520
900
1,600
170
100
200
200
50
70
81
143
29
57,000
60,800
95,000
9,500
                                                           (15)   3,973   (8,750)

                                                           (16)   4,903  (10,800)

                                                           (25)  13,520  (29,780)
                                                                    275
                                         (605)
                            IV-72

-------
Preliminary estimated operating and capital investment costs were then




calculated for each mill.  Then the actual treatment cost for 3.8 cubic




meters (1,000 gallons) of effluent treated was calculated.  The actual




treatment cost included the sum of capital expenditures, installation




cost, debt-retirement cost, and the daily operating expenditure.  The




installation cost was estimated to be 20 percent of the capital expen-




diture.  This installed cost was then amortized over a 20-year period on




a sliding depreciation basis at a 6 percent interest level.  Operating




costs are based on ozone generation, producing oxygen, and the cost of




recycling unused oxygen back to the ozone generator.  The costs are




shown on Table 37.









The NCASI conducted studies at the laboratory level on 12 different




classes of mill effluents (46).  The effluents treated included the




total mill effluent, bleachery effluents, and lime reduced color ef-




fluents.  A small laboratory ozonator was used.  Table 38 shows the




ozone requirements for selected effluents.









The study concluded that 15 to 50 color units were removed per mg of




ozone applied for bleachery effluents, 4 to 5 units per mg of ozone in




the total kraft mill effluents, and less than 1 unit per mg of ozone




in the lime treated effluent.  In a draft report on effluent color reduc-




tion covering the technologies under investigation the NCASI concluded




that the cost of producing ozone is not encouraging for commercialization




of the ozone color reduction process (38).
                            IV-73

-------
                               TABLE 37

  DAILY OPERATING, CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND TREATMENT COSTS, 1974 (45)
                                    Mill A
            Mill B
   Mill C
Mill D
Daily ozone requirements (Ib)

Feed gas to ozone generators

Daily operating expense ($)

Number of ozone generators

Capital Investment for
 ozone generators ($)

Installed cost ($)

Annual debt retirement

Cost per 100 gallons ($)
8,750
Oxygen
393.75
4
10,800
Oxygen
486.00
5
29,780
Oxygen
340.10
14
605
Air
48.40
1
315,000    372,000    976,000'     95,000

378,000    446,400  1,173,000    114,000

 30,200     36,370     96,180      7,706

 , 0.031      0.032      0.064      0.028
                               TABLE 38

               OZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR COLOR REDUCTION OF
              SELECTED PULP AND PAPER MILL EFFLUENTS (46)
     Stream
Lime color reduced
hardwood caustic bleach
extract effluent

Kraft mill total
secondary treated
effluent

NSSC total mill
effluent sodium
  Initial
Color (APHA)
    425
    540
  7,500
Ozone Required For 75%
Color Reduction (mg/1)
          100
           85
          850
                            IV-7 4

-------
Buley stated, in a report on ozone treatment for color reduction, that




from an economic point of view ozone treatment should be used after




other.treatment processes have removed the greatest portion of the waste




contaminants (47).  He stated further that additional experimentation




may reduce the ozone dosage required for color reduction to 50 mg/1 or




less.









Ozone demand is mostly dependent upon the initial BOD or COD of the




wastewater being treated.  Therefore, utilizing ozonation as a polishing




step subsequent to biological treatment may be the most feasible alter-




native.









8.   Amine Treatment Process









The amine treatment process was developed by P. Monzie of Centre Tech-




nique de 1'Industrie des Papiers, Catons et Celluloses (CTP), Grenoble,




France, while he was working on the use of ion exchange resins as a




means of quantitatively recovering organic acids from pulp mill ef-




fluents.  According to the basic process, a pulp mill effluent is first




acidified and then contacted with a dilute organic solution of a high




molecular weight amine. The color bodies present in the effluent react




with the amine to form an organophilic precipitate.  The effluent is




reduced in color through phase separation, the color bodies collect in




the upper (organic) phase.  The organic phase is then mixed with a




controlled (low) volume of alkaline solution to regenerate the amine for
                             IV-75

-------
reuse.  The color bodies are thus concentrated in the alkaline solution.




In practice, for a kraft mill, the alkaline solution could be, for




example, white liquor.  The "spent" white liquor would then be returned




for pulping use in the digesters.  The colored organic compounds would




thus eventually be burned in the recovery furnace.









Based upon Monzie's earlier investigations extensive research by the




Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada, under a program sponsored




by the Department of Environment in cooperation with the Canadian Pulp




and Paper Industry, was undertaken using high molecular weight amines




(48, 49).









The amine treatment process was evaluated in a two-part study program




for the purpose of determining its applicability, and to make improve-




ments in the technical performance as well as to determine the economic




feasibility of the process in North America.









The first part of the program was performed through "batch type" labora-




tory studies to improve upon the Amberlite LA-2/kerosene system used by




Monzie in Grenoble, France during the initial research and development




work.









The results of the studies included finding a new combination amine




(Kemamine T-1902D) and solvent (Soltrol 170) which improved on the




Amberlite LA-2/kerosene system by reducing turbidity and residual odor
                            IV-7 6

-------
in the treated effluent, and slowing hardening of amine-complexed color




bodies..  Additionally, the new amine resulted in lower solubility in




water, and lower chemical costs.  Color removals of 90 to 99 percent




from kraft mill effluents along with 10 to 74 percent BOD and 36 to 78




percent of COD removals were attained.









A small continuous operating laboratory "micro-pilot" unit was developed




for further laboratory testing.  Color, BOD, and COD removals with the




"micro-pilot" unit were comparable to those obtained from the batch




testing in the laboratory.  Figure 89 shows the degree of color reduc-




tion attained for the various samples tested.








A relatively low cost amine regeneration stage for the treatment of the




third-phase emulsion which forms during the process was developed.  The




regeneration stage is a thermal treatment method in which amine, which




would otherwise be lost, is recovered by heating the centrifuged third-




phase emulsion in the presence of excess solvent (Soltrol 170) to about




120°C for several minutes.  It is estimated that a recovery of about 98




percent of the amine from the third-phase emulsion could be accomplished




with this regeneration method.








Costs based on a preliminary engineering design of the amine process




treating alkaline bleach effluent from a 500 ADT per day bleached kraft




pulp mill was calculated.  The capital cost of the amine treatment




process was estimated to be $564,000 with an annual operating cost of
                            IV-7 7

-------
                                   FIGURE  89
                TYPICAL DECOLORIZATION TEST RESULTS WITH T-1902D
               (IN SOLTROL 170) USED AS THE TREATING AGENT  (49 )
                              pH  (after acid-
                              ification) of
                              effluent sample
                              to be treated
            % Color Removal* @ 68  F (based
            	on filtered samples)	
            0
20
40
60
80   100
1.  Bleached kraft mill
    effluents	

(a) Softwood

    (i) bleach plant
        caustic extraction
   (ii) brown stock wash

  (iii) bleach plant
        chlorination wash

   (iv) combined pulp mill
(b) Hardwood

    (i) bleach plant
        caustic extraction

   (ii) brown stock wash

  (iii) combined pulp mill

2.   Unbleached kraft mill
     effluents (softwood)

     (i) combined pulp mill

3.   Low-yield sulphite
     mill effluent (hardwood)

     (i) bleach plant
         caustic extraction

4.   Spent sulphite liquor
     (softwood)	

     (i) sodium base
         10% liquor in H2
-------
$1.41 per ADT.  Figure 90 is a flow diagram of the amine process for




treating the caustic extraction effluent from a 500 TPD pulp mill.









The second part of the study consisted of mill-site tests at a bleached




kraft mill in Quebec (49).









Acidification of the effluent at the mill was done by using C102 gene-




rator waste acid prior to the amine treatment.  The amine concentration




ranged from 10,000 to 20,000 mg/1.  The ratio of solution of amine to




effluent was regulated in the range of 1:4 to 1:2 (by volume).  Tests




were run on the caustic extraction effluent, caustic extraction plus




chlorination effluent, caustic extraction plus brown stock decker fil-




trate, woodroom debarking, and other combined mill effluents.








Color removal efficiencies were equal to or greater than those results




obtained in  the laboratory batch and "micro-pilot" tests.  Conclusions




made from the tests at the mill included the following:








     1.   For caustic extraction effluent, color removal was virtually




          unaffected by wood species (i.e., hardwood versus softwood).








     2.   For a given effluent, the initial color had little effect on




          the degree of color removal achieved.








     3.   An initial pH of 3.0 to 3.3 was required to achieve 95+ per-




          cent efficiency of color removal.
                            IV-79

-------
                                                 FIGURE   90
                  .PROCESS  FLOW   DIAGRAM  FOR  A  TYPICAL
        AMINE. TREATMENT   PROCESS  ATA  BOO  ADT/DAY
                                           PULP   MILL   (48)
From Bleach Plant
Caustic Extraction
Stage Seal Tank
        I050USGPM
       L-0~f
                                                    Amine Solution  200-500 USGPM
                                                         From Mill White
                                                        J Liquor Storage

                                                         Recycling  of Spent Caustic Solution
                           Separator I
                           156,000 USG
                                 Gravity
                                 Separator  II
                                 I5.60O USG
 Exchanger
                                        one.
                                      Amine
                                     Soln. Storage
                                      5OOUSG
                                                                         Hydro-
                                                                         cyclone
                                                 Liq-Liq
                                                 Centrifu
                                                       30O
Treated  Effluent
Mix Tank
2O USG
                                    Spent
                                    Caustic
                                    Solution
                  1-5
                  USGPM
                                                                        To Mill White
                                                                        Liquor System
                        Cone.
                        Sulphuric Acid
                        Storage  6,250    62, 500 USG
                                 USG
                                        -GT
                            Amine  Solution
                            Storage. 125,OOO USG
                                                          CENTRIFU6ED  THIRD PHASE

-------
     4.   The test results confirmed that color reduction of caustic




          extraction effluent would provide the minimum cost solution to




          the effluent color problem.









Additionally, the impact upon the existing mill operation was estimated




to be minimal, requiring 2 to 6 percent increase in black liquor evapora-




tion and lime production capacities.








Original cost estimates were updated and a cost comparison between an




amine and a lime treatment process for color reduction of the caustic




extraction bleachery effluent was calculated.   The capital cost (1974)




for the amine treatment process at a 500 ADT per day bleached kraft




mill was revised to $596,000 and an operating cost of $1.47 per ADT of




pulp.  The total annual cost comparison between amine and lime treatment




was based on a 500 ADT per day kraft mill with a volume of 3,000 gallons




per ADT of caustic extraction effluent.  The after taxes total annual




cost for the amine process was estimated to be $1.10 per ADT of pulp




while the lime treatment process was estimated at $1.24 to $1.43 per ADT




of pulp.








The study recommended that additional research into the exact toxic




effects on amine treated effluent be performed as well as extended con-




tinuous operation of a pilot plant on one type of effluent (i.e.,  caustic




extraction effluent) to determine more reliable estimates of amine




losses and chemical costs.  The average amine loss estimated from this
                            IV-81

-------
study was 1.04 pounds per ADT, but it was noted that these losses were

found to be very sensitive to small analytical and experimental errors.




9.   Additional Color Reduction Techniques




There is a wide diversity of color reduction approaches which have been

studied.  The stage of development of most of these processes is either

at the laboratory or pilot plant level.  Most of the techniques have

been summarized; however, there are a few others which have yet to be

reviewed.  This section of the report will cover these additional tech-

niques which have been investigated and reported on.




Irradiation for treating kraft and sulfite mill effluents was initially

studied by Lenz and Robbins (50).  They observed that both kraft and

NSSC effluents using gamma radiation, both with and without supplemental

treatment by an oxidizing gas (62, air, chlorine), appeared to com-

pletely destroy color bodies.   A study of a radiation enhanced oxidation
                                                         •
process for color reduction of pulp mill effluents was undertaken at the

Oak Ridge .National Laboratory sponsored by NCASI (51).  It was shown

that exposure to 10^ Roentgens in the presence of 500 psi of oxygen

could achieve 90 percent color reduction.  It has also been noted by

NCASI that attempts to commercialize this process are currently under

way (38).




Another study of the irradiation process for color reduction was done by

McKelvey and Dugal (52).  Their initial investigations were carried out
                             IV-82

-------
with a medium pressure mercury lamp in the presence of oxygen using un-




bleached kraft decker effluent, caustic extract from kraft bleaching,




and neutral sulfite semi-chemical pulp washings in a laboratory.









It was felt that the irradiation times were excessively long, and there-




fore additives were used in an attempt to shorten the reaction time.




The kraft decker effluent was used in these investigations.  Sodium




hypochlorite was determined to be the best additive based upon its




effectiveness and cost.  An alkaline pH was also found to be best for




this treatment process.








Irradiation time at various dosages of sodium hypochlorite versus color




levels was determined and the results are shown on Figure 91.  The




researchers concluded that since this process is capable of 100 percent




color removal, the economics might make it more feasible to use the




process for removal of residual color after pretreatment by another




method.  Therefore, the treatment was tried on an effluent that had been




treated with lime for initial color removal.  It was determined that the




irradiation time was reduced significantly on this pretreated effluent,




as Table 39 indicates.








The researchers concluded that additional investigations would be re-




quired before the^ economics of this process could be determined, but




they did point out that no chemical recovery or sludge handling problems




are associated with the process.
                             IV-83

-------
                            FIGURE   91
DECOLORIZATION  OF  KRAFT DECKER  EFFLUENT

  IN  THE PRESENCE OF  SODIUM  HYPOCHLORITE

                               ;(52) .
            ?
            c

            O
            CM
            z
            o
            z.
            <
            CE
too


90


80




70



60





50






40
 30
                20
                                         0% NaOCI
                          15
                  30
45
60
75
                               RRADIATION TIME, min

-------
                               TABLE 39

                  EFFLUENT IRRADIATIONS WITH LIME AND
                     HYPOCHLORITE TREATMENTS (51)

                 Sample      Concentration   Irradiation   Initial   Final
Pretreatment   Volume (ml)     NaOCl (%)      Time (min)
None
None
None
None
Lime
Lime
Lime
2802
2802
2802
2,8003
2802
2,8003
2.8003
0.2
0.1
0.04
0.1
0.05
0.017
0.035
12
18
36
15
5
5
8
27
23
26
26
71
80
80
98
96
95
88
96
91
98
 Percent transmission at 520 nm.
^Optical path ca. 1.0 cm.
^Optical path ca. 6 cm.
A study was conducted by the Nova Scotia Research Foundation for the

Canadian Department of the Environment on the use of fungi for reducing

color, BOD, and suspended solids in pulp mill effluents (53).  Effluent

from a kraft pulp mill was treated in aerated reactors in which the

fungi were grown on submerged screens without additional nutrients.  A

wide range of pH (3 to 7.5) and temperatures (6°C to 20°C) was covered

in the experiments.



It was found that the maximum color reduction was about 50 percent at pH

5.0 and 7.5.  Higher color removals would require nutrients.  No color

reduction was observed at pH of 3.0.  BOD reduction varied between 70

and 90 percent depending on temperature, pH , and fungus used.  Removal

of suspended solids was also 75+ percent.
                             IV-85

-------
It was concluded that for high performance at a low pH and temperature,




the fungal method appeared to be an atractive alternative biological




method for the reduction of BOD and suspended solids from pulp mill ef-




fluents.  However, more research was recommended before the ability of




fungi to remove color could be fully evaluated.









The fungal degradation of lignin that has been modified during pulping




has been studied by scientists at the Forest Products Laboratory of the




U.S. Department of Agriculture, Madison, Wisconsin (54).  Data showed




that the organisms converted over 40 percent of lignin's aromatic carbon




from both kraft and bleached-kraft pulping into carbon dioxide.









B.   EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING DATA









In an attempt to gain more current pilot and/or full-scale data on color




reduction technologies, manufacturers of such systems were contacted.




Of concern were systems utilizing alum coagulation, polymeric adsorption,




ultrafiltration, ion exchange, and chemical precipitation.  Information




sought included system application(s), performance based on field test




results, and both capital and operating costs.









The response of the manufacturers led to no substantive increase in




materials gleaned from the review of current and/or historic literature.




In all cases there was either no response, no additional material avail-




able, or, if there was, it was not available for public disclosure.
                            IV-86

-------
                          SECTION V




      IDENTIFICATION OF THE COLOR REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY




                     REPRESENTING BATEA









Identification of a color reduction technology representing BATEA in-




volved an evaluation of all of the external color reduction technologies




previously discussed in Section IV.  The evaluation included an analysis




of the color reduction efficiency of the technology; operational prob-




lems experienced; stage of technology development; wastewater stream or




streams treated; total cost of treatment; and an analysis of any full




scale color reduction technology in use.  An inventory of external color




reduction technologies is shown on Table 40.  The technologies shown are




either full scale operating plants; full scale but presently not oper-




ating; full scale testing or developmental stage; or pilot plants.  The




evaluation of each of the technologies previously discussed is presented




on the next few pages along with the summary of the evaluations and the




identification of the color reduction technology presently representing




BATEA.









A.   PRELIMINARY EVALUATION









1.   Minimum Lime'









The minimum lime process has been reported in earlier EPA documents. The




process has been used for color reduction of the first caustic extrac-




tion filtrate at two bleached kraft pulp and paper mills which were
                              V-l

-------
                                                                   TAHLK  40

                                              INVKN'i'OKY OK KXTKUNAL COLOR REDUCTION TliCllNOMiCIES
                                                                                            Reported
Technology
Mi u iuium Lime
Mi n iiinini Li me
M i n iiniini L hue
Mini mum L i me
Massive Lime
Modified Lime
(l.jme Mud)
Li mtt
Lime - Magnesia
Domta r Ltd .
1 ron-Li me
Luc a tion
Cforgia Pacific
Woodland, Maine
Georgia Pacific
Crossett , Arkansas
Interstate Paper
U i ceboro, (!eo rgia
Co nt i nenta I Can
Hodge, Lou Lsiana
Springhill, LA
In ternn t i.oiui 1 Paper
Springhill, LA
Ca 1 cas len Paper
Kl Uabeth, 1A
SenneviJ. le, (Quebec ,
Canada
O j 1 Paper C'o. ,
Japan
Stage of Devel opment
Kul I scale (Down at
t ime of report)
I'u 1 1 seal e
Intermittent Use
Kull scale
continuous
Kull scale
Continuous
pi ant has been
d i stiiant 1 ed
Large scale pilot
plant has been
dismant.l ed
Kull scale
testing
Laboratory studies
with pilot plant
proposed
Kull scale
continuous
Waste Streams Treated Color Reduction
Alkaline bleach 4.3 MGD 80-85
Color 8,000-10,000 CU
Lime dosage .1,500-3,000
Caust if: ext ract
Lime dosage 2,000 mg/l
Unbleached kraft eff. 85-90
10 MCI)
Color 1 ,200 CU
Lime dosage 1,500 mg/1
Unbleached kraft and 85-90
NSSC boardmlll eff.
13 MOD
Color 2,000 CU
Lime dosage 1,000 mg/1
Caustic extract and >90
unbleached decker
effluent
unbleached decker
. effluent
Kraft effluent No information
Iliologically treated =90
kraft mi.1.1 effluent
Kraft bleachery effluent No information
Capital Operating
$7M,000 $1.37/ton
Excluding lime
kiln
Similar to G-l' Mill
in Woodland, Maine
$355,100
Excluding c.larifier
and lagoons
$1,761,561 $0.77/ton
Included all
effluent
treatment
$1 .807 ton
Amortized cost
availabl e
$6.35 - $8.47/ton
total operating cost
ava liable
Remarks
Cost - 1973
550 TPD Mill

Cost - 1968
400 TPD Mill
Cost - 1973
620 TPD Mill
Cost - 1973

Cost - 1974
500 TPD Mill

Lime-Si-'awa ter
                    Nova Scot la          Pilot sealc
                    Kfsearch  Konndat ion testi ng
Kraft mill effluent
 5  -  10% seawater
 Lime dosage £_ 250 mg/1
                                                                                                  80
                                                                                                            No information  available

-------



A 1 I Mil
A turn
Alum
Art i vat oil
Ca rbon
(Irunular
Ca rbon
PPRIC
Carbon
Ai_-t ivatud
A) iiiii 1 na
™\
Mil del 10 Im-Kamyr
Ikidelio Im-Kamyr
TAUI.K M>
(Continued)
Reported
l.oc;it it'll Staj;c of Development Waste Streams Treated Co 1 or Reduction
C.u 1 f Scat:*.- I'.iper Pu.l 1 sra 1 e llnox- treated unbleached >90
TM sea loosa , A I ahaina devel opmenta 1 staj-e kraft effluent , 12 MOD
Color 800-1,200 API1A
units
Uike llalkal, I'u 1 1 scale Effluent from production <90
IISSR cont i nnous of ti re cord cellulose
and krafL pulp, 76 MGD
Color I., 000 units
Alum 30 nig/]
i'o 1 yac ry 1 amide f 1 occii l.ant
1- mg/l
Mi My in Sweden Ku 1 1 sc;ile Report on one mill: 'JO
funtiniiuiis UnhJeuchecl kraft effluent
Alum 120 rag/]
St. Kej-is 1'nper '-"rye s»j;il.e testing Affluent Crom a multiple 90
reiisacola , Florida pulping process mill.
Color 1000 C.U.
Miraiiuchi Timher Pilot I'l.ant Combined bleach kraft 50-60
Newcastle, N.B. effluent
Color 2,500 C.U.
Scott Martimes 7'ilot Plant Combined bleach kraft 75-85
Abercombie PC. effluent.
N.S. Color 2,000-4,000 C.U.
Inike of Constance Pilot Plant Biologically treated ''95
Clerinatiy effluent from a calcium
sulfite pulp mill.
Daishowa Paper Co. i'u 11 scale Alkaline bleaching ~95
Iwanuma, Japan continuous
IMdeholn] Pull scale Alkaline bleaching 90-95
Skoghall, Sweden continuous 8 m /MT
Color 14,000 C.U.

'
Cost
Capital Operating Remarks
Total amortized cost = $2.61 Cost - 1974
per ton, operating cost 500 TPD
= $1.64 per ton mill
No information available
No information available
$7,000,000 $3.50/ton Cost - 1974
800 TPD
mill
No information available
No information available
No information available
No information available
$500,000 $0.90 ton Cost - 1974
300 TPl)
mill

-------



Technology
Uddeholm-Kamyi-
Kohm and Haas
Dow Chemi ca )
Corp.
Ami ne Kxt racL ion
UI t r;i 1" i It rat ion
U I tra f i 1 trat ion
Rhone Pou l.enc

Reverse osmosis



Local ion
MI t Is in North
America
Several mi 1 Is in
North America

Quebec
Champ ion Inter-
nat ion a "I , Canton
NC

1 ml . , Cl oquet ,
M inn.
Creen Hay
Packaging,
Creen Bay, WI
TAI1LK 40
(Continued)
Reported
SLa&e ol; Development Waste Streams Treated Color Reduction
Mobile pilot plant: First caustic extract
Mob tie p i 1 ot plant Fi rst caustic extract 90
and Cl- off l.uents
and Cl . ef f 1 uents
Color 9,000-12,000
Pilot plant Caustic extraction 90-99
Pilot plant Pine caustic extract 90-92
Color 3000 CU
Pilot plant Caustic extraction 60-70
ef fluent
ef f 1 uent
Color 6000 CU
La rj;e sen 1 e NSSC pulp and paperboard
testing mi 1 1 wa s t e wa t er


Cost
Capi tal Operating Remarks
-
$1,495,000 $0.70/ton Cost - 1974
700 TPD mill

$ 596,000 $1.47/ton Cost - 1974
500 ADT mill
$0.06-$] .00/1000 gal. Cost - 1974
amort ized cost
No information available

-

-------
required to reduce color during periods of low flow in their receiving




stream.  One of the keys to operation of the system is a properly de-




signed solids contact clarifier discharging sludge at 10-15 percent




solids.  Additionally, the minimum lime process has been successfully




operated at two unbleached kraft mills.  The total effluent from these




two mills is treated with color reductions of 85 to 93 percent reported.









The main operational consideration to be addressed with the minimum lime




process is enchancing the relatively slow settling rate of the lime




sludge.   Section IV discussed various laboratory and pilot plant




studies which have dealt with perfecting this aspect of the minimum lime




process.  The minimum lime processes in full scale use have also ad-




dressed this question.  Fiber fines in the paper mill effluent at one of




the unbleached kraft mills was found to enhance color reduction with




lime additions well below the solubility of calcium hydroxide. The same




unbleached kraft mill experimented with ferric hydroxide, calcium carbon-




ate, starches, polyelectrolytes, and recausticizing sludge with only




marginal results.









The process developed at the two bleached kraft mills utilizes reuse of




the first caustic effluent in the woodroom prior to color reduction.




This provides the necessary source of fiber which aids in the settling




and dewatering of the lime sludge which results from the minimum lime




color reduction process.  An operating cost of the minimum lime process




at one of the two bleached kraft mills was reported to be $1.37 per ton




of product in 1972.  The minimum lime process has proven to be tech-
                              V-5

-------
nologically feasible for color reduction at bleached kraft mills.  Oper-




ational problems such as slow lime sludge settling, sludge handling,




scaling, and foaming must be addressed when designing a full scale




minimum lime process.  Section IV described continuing research into




improving the performance of the lime process through elimination of




these operational problems.  Pilot plant and laboratory results on the




lime process in combination with other chemicals has been promising.  A




brief review of the lime process in combination with these other chem-




icals will be performed.









Another study dealt with using only lime, but with a variation in the




method of application for the purpose of improving the settling rate of




the lime sludge.  The process involved adding a portion of the lime in




the first chlorination effluent prior to addition of the caustic ex-




traction effluent and the remaining lime.  Color reduction up to 87.5




percent was achieved.









2.   Lime and Ferric Chloride









The lime and ferric chloride system was investigated because it was




found that minimum lime reduced color by 85 to 90 percent and that the




remaining color bodies had an apparent average molecular weight of less




than 400.  It was theorized that addition of multivalent ions to remove




the lower molecular weight color bodies, and lime would result in almost




total color reduction. Laboratory experiments on caustic extraction




stage effluent determined the total color reduction to be 95.8 percent
                               V-6

-------
when 500 mg/1 of ferric chloride and 1,000 mg/1 of lime was added.  Also




mentioned earlier was the color reduction technique used in a Japanese




mill.  Iron metal is dissolved in the first chlorination effluent using




a 1.5 to 2 hour retention time, and then mixed with the first caustic




effluent and lime. No chemical dosages or costs for this system were




provided, but the process is achieving 85 to 95 percent color reduction.









3.   Lime - Magnesia Process









This process was analyzed and found to provide good color reduction, but




at this time additional testing on a larger scale is needed and a




recovery system must be developed.  Because of the early stage of




development of this process and the technical aspects still left un-




resolved it has been eliminated, at this time, from consideration as a




BATEA color reduction technology.









4.   Chemicals Studied to Replace Lime









Numerous studies reported on in Section IV evaluated various other




chemicals for color reduction in place of lime.  Some of the chemicals




evaluated for this purpose were ferric sulfate, alum, fly ash, aluminum




sulfate and ferrous sulfate.  Alum will be discussed in detail later in




this section.









Ferric sulfate was concluded to offer an attractive alternative to lime




treatment, but additional studies are needed to establish the economic






                              V-7

-------
feasibility of ferric sulfate in place of lime.  Technically its ad-




vantages are a decreased optimum dosage when compared to lime, and




elimination of the recarbonation step needed in lime treatment.  Ad-




justment of pH after color reduction treatment and prior to effluent




discharge may also be eliminated when using ferric sulfate.  However,




this would depend upon the buffering capacity of the biological treat-




ment system.









Fly ash proved equal or superior to lime treatment, but the amount of




sludge generated would result in a major solids handling problem.  The




sludge was found to be voluminous and slow to settle.









The remaining chemicals mentioned were not as effective as the lime




treatment process for color reduction.









5.   Activated Carbon Adsorption









Technically activated carbon adsorption has been proven to reduce color.




However, at this time the economics of the process appear to relegate




its use to that of a polishing stage treatment after the bulk of the




impurities have been reduced by other treatment steps.   It does offer




the possibility of producing reusable industrial process water which in




certain situations might make the economics of the system feasible.









Carbon adsorption in continuous countercurrent stirred  contactors is




believed to have promise of providing treatment at lower operating costs
                              V-8

-------
and substantially lower capital costs.  A capital cost estimate for a 10




MGD treatment system for an 800 TPD mill was $7 million (1974).  The




operating cost was estimated at $3.50 per ton of production which in-




cluded a credit for reused water.









Ruling this treatment out of consideration because of its high cost is




not within the framework of this report.  Results from pilot plant work




were good, and therefore it was included in the final selection of a




BATEA color reduction technology.









6.   Activated Alumina Adsorption









This process has been in the development stages at a calcium sulfite




pulp mill in Germany.  The results of the technology development have




been encouraging thus far; however, further research is planned in




Germany and Canada to establish the specific technical requirements of




the process for use in developing a preliminary cost estimate.









The technology will not be included in the final selection of a BATEA




technology because it is at a relatively early stage of development.




However, it should be included in any future color reduction technology




reviews because of the promising results of tests done thus far.









7.   Resin Separation and Ion Exchange Processes









Three processes have been developed to at least the pilot plant stage
                             V-9

-------
under this color reduction technology.  These are the Rohm and Haas




granular resin separation process, the Uddeholm-Kamyr adsorption and ion




exchange process, and a polymeric resin process developed by Dow Chem-




ical.









Only the Uddeholm-Kamyr process is presently used on a full scale




operation.  Two bleached kraft mills, one in Sweden and one in Japan,




are utilizing this color reduction technology on their alkaline bleach




effluent.  Color reductions of 90 to 95 percent have been reported with




an operating cost of $0.90 per ton reported for the 300 TPD Swedish mill




(1974).   Both mills have had to replace resin beds as a result of de-




activation problems.









The Rohm and Haas and Dow Chemical color reduction technologies are both




at the pilot stage of development.  Rohm and Haas claims 90 percent




color reduction as a result of pilot work.  Cost estimates developed




from the testing was $1,495,000 for a capital cost and an operating cost




of $1.70 per ton of production (1974) based upon a 700 TPD bleached




kraft mill treating the first chlorination and caustic effluents.  The




Dow Chemical process claims 84+ percent color reuction of the same




wastewater streams; however, no cost estimates were available.









Both the Rohm and Haas and Dow Chemical color reduction technologies




have not been included in the final selection process of a BATEA tech-




nology because the processes need to be evaluated on a larger scale




basis to determine chemical regenerant requirements and the ability to
                             V-10

-------
recycle treated water back into various mill chemical systems.  The




Uddeholm-Kamyr process will be included in the final selection at the




end of this section.









8.   Membrane Processes









Ultrafiltration and hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis) have been under-




going continuous development for the past few years.  Membrane fouling




and related problems have been the major drawback to both of these




processes.  Prefiltration has until recently been necessary to attempt




to limit the membrane plugging problem.  However, Rhone Poulenc has




developed a polymeric membrane which requires no pretreatment.  Color




reductions of 60 to 70 percent were achieved in initial studies of this




new membrane.









Dynamically formed membranes are also being developed and tested which




are reported to decrease the plugging problem and lengthen the life of




the membrane.  Initial laboratory tests of the dynamically formed mem-




branes for hyperfiltration and ultrafiltration were good, but the




researchers indicated more testing was necessary to establish the tech-




nical feasibility of applying these filtration techniques to kraft




wastewater.









Although the development of new membranes has resulted in improved




operations of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis neither technology is




at the stage of its development to be considered in the final BATEA







                           V-ll

-------
technology selection.  They do, however, warrant continued monitoring to




assess the effect of new breakthroughs in their technological develop-




ment.









90   Alum Coagulation and Recovery









Alum coagulation is presently in use in a bleached kraft mill in the




USSR, unbleached kraft mills in Sweden, and an unbleached kraft mill in




Alabama.  Color reductions of 90+ percent have been reported at these




mills.  Alum sludge handling problems have also been reported.  The alum




color reduction process in Alabama has experienced operational problems




with the alum recovery process which is a part of their system.









Alum has proven to be capable of effluent color reduction in bleached




kraft mills, and as has been discussed above, is in full scale use for




this purpose.  For these reasons alum will be included in the final




selection of a'BATEA technology.









10.  Flotation Processes









Recently studies of dissolved air flotation and ion flotation for color




reduction of bleach plant effluents have been carried out at the lab-




oratory level.  Ion flotation, seems to offer the more attractive process




for color reduction.  However, the researchers pointed out that because




of the high cost for treatment, the feasibility of this color reduction




process depends upon development of a surfactant recovery process or a
                           V-12

-------
low cost surfactant.









Both of the flotation processes are at an early stage in their devel-




opment with technical and economic problems and questions still to be




resolved.  For these reasons they were not included in the final selec-




tion of a BATEA technology.









11.  Ozone Treatment









Ozone has been shown through laboratory tests to be capable of color




reduction of kraft mill wastewater.  However, ozone demand for color




reduction has been found to depend upon the initial BOD or COD of the




wastewater being treated.  Additionally, the cost for ozone generation




and color reduction is high.  Therefore, it is felt that utilizing




ozonation as a polishing step subsequent to biological treatment may be




the most feasible alternative.









Development of a less expensive method of generating ozone is needed to




make this color reduction technique feasible.  For the reason of ex-




tremely high cost and a lack of any extensive pilot plant operating




results ozone has not been included in the final selection of a BATEA




technology.
                             y
12.  Amine Treatment Process
The Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada has been studying the
                           V-13

-------
possibility of utilizing high molecular weight amines for color re-




duction of the alkaline bleach plant effluent.  The testing has pro-




ceeded from the initial laboratory analysis to the pilot plant stage.




The results of the pilot plant testing showed that color reduction of




the caustic extraction effluent would provide the minimum cost amine




treatment process solution to the effluent color problem.  It was also




estimated that the impact upon existing mill operations would be min-




imal, with 2 to 6 percent more black liquor evaporation and lime pro-




duction capacities required.  A preliminary cost estimate was developed




for a 500 ADT per day bleached kraft mill reducing the color in the




caustic extraction bleachery effluent.  A capital cost of $596,000 was




estimated and an operating cost of $1.47 per ADT of pulp.









The researchers recommended more extended continuous operation of a




pilot plant as well as research into the toxic effects of the amine




treated effluent be performed to determine more reliable data on the




system.









Because of the preliminary stage of development of the amine treatment




process and the questions left to be resolved it was not included in the




final selection of a BATEA color reduction technology.  However, any




future research should be monitored so that future updates of the color




reduction technologies can report on the development of the amine




process.
                         V-14

-------
13.  Other Color Reduction Techniques


Other color reduction techniques reported on, irradiation and fungal
degradation, are both at early phases in their development.  Specific
operating data is not available for use in adequately assessing the
ability of each process to provide an economic, technically sound color
reduction technique.  Therefore, the processes have not been included in
the final selection of a BATEA color reduction technology.


B.   FINAL EVALUATION - IDENTIFICATION OF A TECHNOLOGY REPRESENTING BATEA


The following technologies were selected for the final evaluation in the
identification of a technology representing BATEA:

                             #
1.   Minimum lime;
2.   Activated carbon adsorption;
3.   Uddeholm-Kamyr ion exchange; and
4.   Alum coagulation and recovery.


At the beginning of this section it was stated that the evaluation of
BATEA color reduction technologies would be based upon: (1) stage of
development of the process (full scale, pilot plant, etc.); (2) oper-
ational problems experienced; (3) total operating cost; (4) the waste-
water streams that can be treated; and (5) the color reduction efficien-
cy of the process.  The four technologies selected after the preliminary
evaluation will be evaluated in a more detailed manner.
                           V-15

-------
The stage of development of the color reduction technology was selected




as the most important factor in the selection of a technology represen-




ting BATEA.  Many of the technologies achieved excellent color reduction




efficiencies.  However, if the technology is only at the laboratory or




pilot plant stage in its development, then the value of the data re-




ported must be evaluated with this in mind.   Operational problems and




cost data cannot be adequately assessed at this early stage of devel-




opment, and the problems which do occur when technologies are scaled up




cannot and normally have not been identified.









The factor that was selected next was operational problems experienced




by the technology at the specific stages of  its development.  A tech-




nology must be able to operate on a continuous basis with a minimal




amount of operational downtime to be considered an effective and useful




color reduction technology.  Total operating cost was selected as the




next evaluation factor.  Cost of treatment,  as has been covered earlier,




does affect a treatment technique's value as a feasible color reduction




technology.









The specific wastewater streams within the bleached kraft mill which can




be treated by the technology was selected as the fourth evaluation fac-




tor.  Many technologies can achieve optimum efficiency and treatment




operation through treating only one specific wastewater stream.  The




value of this type of technology at a mill whose color originates at




another wastewater stream is obviously minimal, and selection of a




different color reduction technology must be made.
                          V-16

-------
The factor selected as least important was the color reduction efficien-




cy.  For the four technologies being evaluated there is very little




difference in color reduction efficiency.  All are reported to achieve




at least 80 percent color reduction efficiency.  For this reason, the




efficiency of the color reduction technologies is of minimal importance.









The resulting point values assigned to the five evaluation phases are




presented below:









     Stage of color reduction technology development  =   5




     Operational problems experienced                 =   4




     Total operating cost                             =   3




     Wastewater streams treated                       =   2




     Color reduction efficiency                       =   1









Each of the five evaluation factors will be presented below with the




four color reduction technologies evaluated and rated within each of the




five phases.   A point value of four will be assigned the best technology




for the evaluation factor being analyzed, and a point value of one




assigned to the technology considered to be less advantageous under that




evaluation phase.









It should be noted before the evaluation factors are assigned point




values that the selection of most important to least important was done




on a general overall basis.  Individual mills may rank the evaluation




factors in a different sequence and thereby achieve a different BATEA
                          V-17

-------
technology.  However, on a general basis it was concluded that the




ranking of the evaluation factors should be as presented in this section.









1.   Stage of Color Reduction Technology Development









Minimum lime and alum coagulation have been developed to the full scale




operational stage at more pulp mills than the ion exchange technology or




activated carbon.  Minimum lime, or a lime process, for color reduction




is in full scale operation or available for full scale operation at six




pulp and paper mills.  Alum coagulation is used at a bleached kraft mill




in the USSR, unbleached kraft mills in Sweden, and one in Alabama.




Minimum lime and alum can be considered to be at about the same stage of




development except for their respective recovery systems.  Minimum lime




has a recovery system which has been operational, while an alum recovery




system is still being developed.  For this reason, minimum lime was




rated as the most advanced color reduction technology, with alum second.









The Uddeholm-Kamyr process is being used at a bleach kraft mill in




Sweden and Japan, while the activated carbon adsorption process is not




in full scale operation at any pulp and paper mill for the purpose of




color reduction.  It has undergone pilot plant testing.  The resulting




point values given to each of the four technologies for this evaluation




phase is shown below:









     Minimum lime                               =   4.0




     Alum coagulation and recovery              =   3.0
                           V-18

-------
     Uddeholm-Kamyr (ion exchange)              =   2




     Activated carbon adsorption                =   1









2.   Operational Problems Experienced









From the data available at this time it was concluded that the activated




carbon adsorption process experienced the fewest operational problems.




However, it should be noted that no full scale activated carbon ad-




sorption color reduction process is in use on a full scale basis.









Minimum lime treatment was selected as the next technology with fewer




operational problems.   The decision was based on a comparison with an




alum coagulation and recovery system.  Sludge handling problems are




common to both processes.  Dewatering aids, such as fiber for the lime




process, are used to improve the sludge handling.  The lime recovery




system has been tried and proven, but the alum recovery process is a




technology still being developed.









Ranked last in this evaluation phase was the Uddeholm-Kamyr ion exchange




process.  Resin beds have required replacing at both of the kraft mills




using the process because of deactivation problems.









The results of the point values for each of the color reduction tech-




nologies under this evaluation phase are listed below:
                           V-19

-------
     Activated carbon adsorption             -   4




     Minimum lime                            =.   3




     Alum coagulation and recovery           =   2




     Uddeholm-Kamyr (ion exchange)           =   1









3.   Total Operating Cost









The cost comparison between the four color reduction technologies was




based upon actual operating systems or pilot plant work done at a mill




site.  Table 40 presented both capital and operating costs for the color




reduction technologies.  Detailed capital cost estimates for these




technologies on a model mill situation was not required, therefore, it




was necessary to base the capital cost assessment on the data provided




on Table 40.









Activated carbon would require the highest expenditure of capital.  It




is much more difficult to compare the remaining three technologies




from a capital expenditure standpoint, but alum coagulation and recovery,




minimum lime and ion exchange would all be at least less than half the




capital cost of an activated carbon system.









Based on the available operation and maintenance cost of the four tech-




nologies the Uddeholm-Kamyr (ion exchange system) is the least costly




to operate, followed by minimum lime, alum coagulation, and activated
                           V-20

-------
carbon.  It should be pointed out that both the alum and activated

carbon systems were based on color reduction at unbleached kraft mills,

and as such the cost for similar treatment at a bleached kraft mill can

be expected to be higher in terms of operating cost.  Costs, and their

source, for the four technologies are presented on Table 41.



                             TABLE 41

          COMPARISON OF COLOR REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY COSTS


Technology                         Cost Information

Minimum Lime                  Capital cost                $843,000

                              Total operating cost        $1.55/ton

Alum coagulation and re-      Total operating cost        $2.61/ton
 covery
                3
Activated Carbon              Capital cost                $7,000,000
                              Operating cost              $3.50/ton

UddeholmrKamyr (ion ex-       Capital cost                $500,000
 change)
                              Operating cost              $0.90/ton

 Costs were based on G-P bleached kraft mill, Woodland, Maine (1972-625 TPD)
 Costs were adjusted to 1974 by ENR index ration 1995/1761.

2
 Costs are based on Gulf States unbleached kraft mill in Tuscaloosa,
 Alabama (1974-500 TPD).

 Costs are based on pilot plant work at St. Regis, Pensacola, Florida
 (1974-800 TPD)

A
 Costs are based on bleached kraft mill in Skoghall, Sweden  (1974-300 TPD).
                               V-21

-------
The point values assigned to the color reduction technologies for this




evaluation phase are shown below:









     Uddeholm-Kamyr (ion exchange)           =   4




     Minimum Lime                            =   3




     Alum coagulation and recovery           =   2




     Activated carbon adsorption             =   1









4.   Wastewater Streams Treated









Alum coagulation and activated carbon adsorption can both treat the




entire wastewater effluent from a bleached kraft mill.  However, ac-




tivated carbon would be more likely used as a polishing stage to the




treatment system rather than the actual treatment.  Therefore, alum was




the technology determined to handle more wastewater streams than the




other three technologies.









Activated carbon was determined to be next followed by minimum lime and




the ion exchange process which handles only the alkaline bleach ef-




fluent.  Recent studies into the minimum lime process have shown that it




can be used to treat other streams in combination with the alkaline




bleach effluent.









The point values assigned to the color reduction technologies for this




evaluation phase are shown below:
                             V-22

-------
     Alum coagulation and recovery           =  4




     Activated carbon adsorption             =  3




     Minimum lime                            =  2




     Uddeholm-Kamyr (ion exchange)           =  1









5.   Color Reduction Efficiency









The Uddeholm-Kamyr process was reported to achieve 90 to 95 percent




color reduction at the bleached kraft mill in Sweden while activated




carbon was reported to achieve 90 percent at the pilot plant tests of




the system.  Alum coagulation achieved a little less than 90 percent




color reduction at the bleached kraft mill in the USSR and lime achieved




approximately 80 percent at the two bleached kraft mills discussed




earlier.









Based on these efficiencies the following point values were assigned to




the color reduction technologies in this evaluation phase:









     Uddeholm-Kamyr (ion exchange)           =  4




     Activated carbon adsorption             =  3




     Alum coagulation and recovery           =  2




     Minimum lime                            =  1









The point value assigned each color reduction technology under the




respective evaluation phases was then multiplied by the point value
                            V-23

-------
assigned for the specific evaluation phase.  The calculation of the




total point values for each color reduction technology under each eval-




uation phase is shown on Table 42.









C.   BATEA TECHNOLOGY









Based upon the preceding evaluation minimum lime and alum coagulation




were determined to be the top two technologies presently representing




BATEA.  Minimum lime has the main advantage of a proven recovery system.




Alum coagulation will perform as well as lime, but the recovery system




for alum must still be developed.  Therefore,  minimum lime was selected




as presently representing the best available technology.  Further de-




velopments in any of the technologies described in this report could




change this determination,  and an update at some point in the future




should be done to verify or revise the selection of minimum lime as the




color reduction technology representing BATEA.
                            V-24

-------
BATEA
Color Reduction
Technology	
Minimum Lime

Activated Carbon

Ud d e hoIm-Ka myr

Alum Coagulation
Minimum Lime

Activated Carbon

Uddeholm-Kamyr

Alum Coagulation
                                            TABLE 42

                      SUMMARY OF BATEA COLOR REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS


                                                    Evaluation Phase
Stage Operational Total Wastewater Color
of Problems Operating Streams Reduction
Development Experienced Cost Treated Efficiency
Point
5 4
Point Value
4 3
1 4
2 1
3 2
Value Assigned
3
Assigned Color
3
1
4
2
Calculated Point Value
20 12
5 16
10 4
15 8
Total
nimum Lime 46
urn Coagulation 39
tivated Carbon 33
deholm-Kamyr 32
9
3
12
6
Point Value for

Evaluation Phase
2
Reduction Technology
2
3
1
4
for Color Reduction Technology
4
6
2
8
Color Reduction Technology

1
1
3
4
2
1
3
4
2


-------
                         SECTION VI




        RECOMMENDED BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE -




                         AVERAGE DAY









This section of the report presents the calculation of the BATEA




effluent color discharge for the average day condition.  The calculation




of the BATEA average day color discharge has been based upon a color




control process concluded to be technologically feasible at the present




time.  Optimizing color reduction would require treatment of all the




color contributing wastewater streams from a bleached kraft mill.




However, as determined in Section V, development of a color reduction




technology to achieve this optimized condition has not reached the stage




of actual application as a feasible process.  As discussed earlier the




continuing research into further development of these color reduction




technologies should be monitored by the EPA.  Further research could




achieve a feasible color reduction process capable of color reduction of




a greater portion of the color contributing streams than is possible




with the minimum lime process.









The basis for calculating the BATEA effluent color discharge for average




day will be the minimum lime color reduction of the first stage caustic




extraction effluent.  The first stage caustic extraction effluent was




determined to be the major source of color at the majority of the 26




pulp and paper mills surveyed.  In addition to the minimum lime treat-




ment of the first stage caustic extraction effluent the reduction in




total effluent color caused by reducing or eliminating the wastewater
                             VI-1

-------
discharge from the pulp mill decker or screen room will be evaluated.

Reducing or eliminating the amount of wastewater from this phase of

the pulping operation is a BATEA internal control and as such must

be evaluated as to its effect upon the total color discharged from a

bleached kraft operation.  This particular process was determined to

have contributed an average of 24 percent of the total mill color load

at the bleached kraft mills sampled' for decker/screen room color.




The minimum lime process was selected in Section V as the color reduc-

tion technology presently representing BATEA.   Two bleached kraft pulp

and paper mills presently have a minimum lime process for color reduc-

tion of the first caustic extraction effluent.  The process is used only
                             t
during low flow conditions in the mill's effluent receiving stream.

Color reduction efficiencies of approximately 80 percent have been

achieved at both mills.  Calculation of BATEA effluent color discharge

loads were done with an 80 percent reduction efficiency used to deter-

mine the color load which can be removed from the first stage caustic

extraction effluent.




The effect of reducing or eliminating the decker/screen room discharge

will be evaluated on the basis of the percent discharge (color load)

eliminated.  A minimum of 50 percent reduction in flow (color load)

will be used along with 100 percent reduction in decker/screen room

flow (color load)„
                             VI-2

-------
The total mill color load, which was used to calculate the BATEA ef-




fluent color discharge for average day, was determined from the color




measured at the influent to the secondary wastewater treatment system




and the total bleach plant production.  Section III has already presented




the reasons for the selection of these two parameters versus use of the




final effluent and the final mill production presently used.  Most




pulp and paper mills do keep records on daily bleach plant production,




including a breakdown by softwood and hardwood.









One item of particular importance in establishing BATEA effluent color




limitations is determining the variability factors necessary for cal-




culating the maximum 30 day average and maximum day limitations,,




Normally, these variability factors are determined by statistically




evaluating at least a 13-month period of daily wastewater loads to




determine the annual average day load, the maximum 30 day average




load,  and the maximum day load.  The variability factors are then




calculated by dividing the maximum 30-day average load by the average




day load, and the maximum day load by the average day.  These factors




are then used to calculate the maximum 30-day average and maximum day




limitations.









The scope of this study did not include an evaluation of the color load




variability over a long-term period (at least 13 months).  Therefore,




BATEA effluent color limitations of maximum 30 day average and maximum




day were not calculated.  Instead the average day for the color survey




period was determined and the annual average day color discharge was






                              VI-3

-------
calculated using this value.  It is recommended that daily color loads




at a few of the average bleached kraft mills examined in this study be




obtained, or monitored and determined (if not available) for at least a




13 month period.  Using this information the average color load deter-




mined in this study would be verified or revised if required.  Then




the maximum 30 day average and maximum day color loads can be deter-




mined, and with the annual average day color load the variability




factors for calculating the BATEA effluent color limitations can be




obtained.









After evaluation of the data gathered at the 23 papergrade bleached




kraft mills, it was determined that all of the bleached kraft subcate-




gories, except for dissolving kraft and soda mills, would be included in




one subcategory for calculating the BATEA color limitations.  The sub-




category is called bleached kraft.  The following subsection will




describe the basis for this determination.









A.   LOGIC FOR PAPERGRADE SINGLE BLEACHED KRAFT COLOR LIMITATIONS









Kraft pulping and bleaching operations account for the large majority of




color generated by the mills surveyed, while only a small portion is




generated by the paper mill operation.  Spot checks were made on paper




mill effluents during the sampling phase to verify this assumption and




the data showed from 3 percent of total color measured at the secondary




treatment influent in Mill No. 134 to 3 percent of the total color in




Mill No. 161 measured at this sample point.
                             VI-4

-------
With this basic premise verified (the paper making operation in an




integrated pulp and paper manufacturing operation generates insignif-




icant color when compared to the total), the pulping and bleaching




phases were then considered.









Pulping and bleaching both are accomplished by processes designed to do




essentially the same task, to remove the color causing material (primarily




lignin) and purify the cellulose fiber.  This purification is accom-




plished in nearly all cases in such a way as to maintain maximum fiber




integrity and strength.  The exception being dissolving kraft which will




be dealt with as a separate subcategory for that reason.









All the bleached kraft subcategories use similar pulping operations




with variations in operating parameters to accommodate differences in




wood types and final product requirements.  The end uses are so similar,




whether the pulp is being produced for market or for internal use to




directly produce paper, that the only significant variation within a




species group is final pulp brightness.  Strength variations are not




intentional and result from wood characteristics and individual mill




process differences.









Figure 57 shows that pulping targets are essentially the same within




each species group.  It has been shown in this report that the large




majority of color generation in overall pulp mill effluent comes from




two sources.  In the pulping area, the screen or decker effluent is by
                             VI-5

-------
far the major contributor, and in the bleaching area, the first two




bleaching stages account for the large majority of color from that




system and the largest single source of color in the entire mill complex.









Because the pulping phase is essentially the same in all subcategories




only the bleaching operation varies.  A review of bleaching shows that




the process is an extension of pulping in that it continues the lignin




removal and cellulose purification action.  Chlorine in the first




bleaching stage, followed by extraction of the chlorinated organic




materials in the second stage using sodium hydroxide, removes nearly all




of the impurities left in the cellulose mass.  What remains is reacted




with the agents used to complete the bleaching process in subsequent




stages, primarily chlorine dioxide and hypochlorite.









All mills surveyed bleached to final brightness between 82.0 and 90.0




TAPPI points.  The amount of lignin left in the pulp in this brightness




range is extremely small and variations are not accurately measurable by




a normal "K" number test used in pulping and bleaching.  Because this




material is the primary source of color, it was concluded that final




brightness and final product subcategory have an insignificant effect on




bleach plant color contribution in the bleached kraft subcategories




surveyed.  This conclusion was verified by the random scattering of




points in Figure 65.









Based on the above logic and survey results, it was decided that no




sound basis existed for different color limits within the bleached kraft






                             VI-6

-------
subcategory in the scope of this report.  Only dissolving kraft and soda




pulping were considered as separate subcategories requiring limitations




based on process and product differences.









The only variation from this single subcategory concept of any sig-




nificance in the survey data was the color load from the mills which




produced only fine paper.  Lower color loads at these three mills were




noted.  These low figures are explained as resulting from the selection




of mills to be sampled.  Hardwood was the predominent specie at these




three mills and hardwood is shown to contribute less color in Ibs/ton




than softwood.  The three bleached kraft fine paper mills surveyed use




hypochlorite bleach which is shown to reduce color load, with one of the




mills adding extra hypochlorite for color reduction.









It was also noted that the mills surveyed which produced fine paper and




market pulp had essentially the same average color per ton as mills




producing only market pulp.  This would indicate that the production of




fine paper at a mill is not sufficient basis to expect lower color




generation in its effluent.









Thus, a single color standard is developed to include the following




subcategories:




     Bleached Kraft - Market Pulp




     Bleached Kraft - BCT Papers




     Bleached Kraft - Fine Papers
                             VI-7

-------
B.   RATIO;  100 PERCENT SOFTWOOD TO 100 PERCENT HARDWOOD PULP BLEACHED









Section III of this report evaluated the specific effect that bleaching




softwood pulp versus bleaching hardwood pulp had on the color load at




the 26 pulp and paper mills surveyed.  It was determined that because of




the obviously higher color load which results when bleaching softwood




pulp the BATEA effluent color limitations would be determined on the




basis of the wood species pulped.  The method selected was a BATEA




effluent color limitation (average day) with the lowest limit at 100




percent hardwood pulp and progressing at a linear relationship to the




highest limit at 100 percent softwood pulp.  Determination of the




specific effluent color limitation at any bleached kraft, dissolving




kraft, or soda mill would then be determined by the percent softwood




pulp bleached.  The specific ratio of 100 percent softwood to 100




percent hardwood will now be determined.









The ratio of 100 percent softwood to 100 percent hardwood pulp bleached




was determined by adding the daily color load at the influent to the




secondary wastewater treatment system for each of the mills surveyed




that bleached either 100 percent softwood or hardwood pulp and deter-




mining an average color load for both.  The average color load at the




100 percent softwood pulp mills was then divided by the average color




load at the secondary influent for 100 percent hardwood pulp.  The




resulting value is the approximate ratio to be used in calculating the




BATEA effluent color limitations.







                            VI-8

-------
Mills 107, 126, 117, and 127 bleached 100 percent softwood pulp while

mills 140 and 187 bleached 100 percent hardwood pulp.  Mill 127 was not

used in the ratio determination because it is a dissolving kraft mill

and not a bleached kraft mill as are the other four mills.  Mill 117 was

also not included in the ratio determination because it was utilizing

hypochlorite on the first caustic extraction effluent for the purpose of

color reduction of that wastewater stream.



Table 43 shows the calculation of the 100 percent softwood pulp to the

100 percent hardwood pulp ratio.



                             TABLE 43

RATIO:  100 PERCENT SOFTWOOD TO 100 PERCENT HARDWOOD PULP BLEACHED
        100 Percent Softwood
           Color Load at
Mill     Secondary Influent
 No.      kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)

107        305   (610)
           231   (461)
           310   (621)

126        403   (806)
           385   (716)
           315   (630)

Total    1,922 (3,844)

Average    320   (641)


Ratio    100 Percent Softwood
         100 Percent Hardwood
Mill
 No.

140
187
100 Percent Hardwood
   Color Load at
 Secondary Influent
  kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
    84
   116
    90

   220
   230
   200
(169)
(231)
(180)

(440)
(460)
(400)
641
313
   940 (1,880)

   157   (313)



  2.05
                             VI-9

-------
Based upon the ratio calculated on Table 43, a ratio of 2:1 was used in




the calculation of the BATEA effluent color discharge (average day).









C.   METHOD USED TO CALCULATE BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE




     (AVERAGE DAY)









The average day BATEA effluent color discharge loads were calculated




on the basis of the BOD raw waste load reported by each mill during




the color survey.  Only those mills surveyed which were at, or below,




the BATEA BOD raw waste load criteria during the color survey were




used in calculating the discharge loads for color.  The rationale sup-




porting this procedure is that the mills which met the BOD raw waste




load for BATEA had eliminated that portion of their color load, which




results from insufficient internal controls, to the wastewater treat-




ment system.  Therefore, the color load from these mills (as defined




by the raw waste BOD) would approximate the color loads from the




entire industry with tighter internal controls adopted on an




industry-wide basis.









Based upon the flow and wastewater BOD values submitted by each of the




mills BOD raw waste loads were calculated.   The resulting BOD loads




along with the BATEA raw waste BOD load for each of the 26 mills sur-




veyed appears on Table 44.   It should be noted that when the BOD was




measured at the ASB influent a 15 percent BOD reduction through the




primary clarifier was used.
                             VI-10

-------
                             TABLE 44

                   RAW WASTE BOD DETERMINATIONS
                 Average Raw Waste
                BOD for Color Survey
                  kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
BATEA Raw Waste
      BOD
kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
100
101
102
103
105
106
107
108
110
111
113
114
117
118
119
121
122
125
126
127
134
136
140
152
161
187
39.4
22.7
49.7
37.6
32.1
75.5
38.3
33.2
26.8
31.7
41.2
40.1
9.7
35.5
21.5
33.2
39.3
25.6
30.4
31.0
18.6
35.5
29.5
19.7
Not
24.7
(78.8)
(45.3)
(99.3)
(75ol)l
(64.1)2
(150. 9)1
(76=6)3
(66. 3)1
(53.5)
(63.3)
(82.1)
(80.2)
(19. 4)1
(71. O)4
(44. 7)5
(66.1)1
(78.5)
(51. 2)6
(60. 7)1
(62. O)7
(37.2)
(70. 9)8
(58. 9)1
(39.3)
Included in BATEA Mill
(49. 3)1
26.5
23.5
26.5
23.5
26.0
23.5
23.5
37.5
23.5
26.0
26.5
26.5
26.0
23.5
23.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
37.5
23.5
23.5
26.5
30.0
Selection^
26.5
(53.0)
(47.0)
(53.0)
(57.0)
(52.0)
(47.0)
(47.0)
(75.0)
(47.0)
(52.0)
(53.0)
(53.0)
(52.0)
(47.0)
(47.0)
(53.0)
(53.0)
(53.0)
(53.0)
(75.0)
(47.0)
(47.0)
(53.0)
(60.0)

(53.0)
1.   BOD was measured at the primary effluent, therefore, 15 percent
     was added to the measured values.

2.   Only one day of the color survey was used to calculate BOD load.

3.   BOD was measured at the ASB influent for only the 1st and 3rd day
     of the color survey.  15% was added to this measured value.

4.   Day one and three of the color survey was used to determine BOD load.

5.   BOD data for period 7/74 through 6/75 was used to calculate BOD load.

6.   BOD was measured at the ASB influent on the 2nd and 3rd day of the
     color survey.  15% was added to the measured value.

7.   BOD was measured at the ASB influent on the 1st and 2nd day of the
     color survey.  15% was added to measured value.

8.   BOD data for 1/75 through 6/75 was used to calucate the BOD load.

9.   Mill's wastewater treatment system is shared with two other paper mills.
     Therefore,  BOD data could not be used.
                             VI-11

-------
Nine mills were determined to be at, or below, the BATEA BOD raw waste


load.  Six bleached kraft mills (Mills 101, 117, 119, 125, 134, and


187), two dissolving kraft mills (Mill 108 and 127) and the one soda


mill (Mill 152) were included in the 9 mills.  These mills will be used


in calculating the average day BATEA effluent color discharge loads.





D.   BLEACHED KRAFT SUBCATEGORY





Table 45 shows the average color load at the first stage caustic ex-


traction effluent, color load reduction through application of the


minimum lime process, and the average color load at the secondary treat-


ment influent before and after minimum lime treatment at the 6 bleached


kraft mills representing BATEA.  Also shown is the total average color


load after treatment of 88 Kg/KKg (175 Ibs/ton).  The percent softwood


pulp bleached by the 6 mills was then determined.  Table 46 shows the


determination of the percent softwood pulp bleached to be 49 percent.




                 , f
The final step in .calculating the average day BATEA effluent color dis-


charge was to apply the effect that reducing or eliminating the dis-


charge from the second largest source of color in a bleached kraft


mill the decker/screen room.  This internal control is a BATEA control


and as such must be evaluated to determine what effect it will have


upon the color load discharged by bleached kraft mills.  Because it


may not be possible for all bleached kraft operations to totally


eliminate the color load contributed by the decker/screen room process
                             VI-12

-------
                                                 TABLE 45

                     DETERMINATION OF AVERAGE COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT
                                             BLEACHED KRAFT
I
M
OJ
              Average Color Load @ First
Mill Caustic Extraction Effluent
No. kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
101
117
119
125
134
187
Total
Average
95
-
46
258
37
101


(190) L
-
(92)
(517)
(74)
(202)
•;/?

Color Reduction
   Achieved
kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
Average Total Color Load @ Secondary
         Treatment Influent
                                               76

                                               37
                                              196
                                               30
                                               81
          (152)

           (74)
          (391)
           (59)
          (162)
Before Treatment
kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
189
82
245
100
217
(378)
(164)
(590)
(199)
(433)
After Treatment
kg/kkg (Ibs/ton)
113
62
45
100
70
136
526
88
(226)
(125)2
(90)
(199)
(140)
(271)
(1,051)
(175)
       1.  Day 2 and 3 of color survey was used to calculate average.

       2.  Hypochlorite is used by Mill 117 for color removal; therefore, the color measured  at  the
           secondary treatment influent was used as the after treatment color load.

-------
                             TABLE 46
               BLEACHED KRAFT PERCENT SOFTWOOD PULP
Mill
No.
101
117
119
125
134
187
Average
kkg
221
307
. 202
804
209
-
Softwood Pulp Average Hardwood Pulp Percent
(tons)
(243)
(338)
(222)
(885)
(230)
-
kkg
380
-
279
70
• 390
706
(tons)
(418)
-
(307)
(77)
(429)
(778)
Softwood
37
100
42
92
35
0
Total    1,743  (1,918)




Total pulp bleached




Average percent softwood
    1,825  (2,009)




3,568 kkg (3,927 tons)




1,743/3,568 (1,918/3,927) x 100 = 49 percent
                            VI-14

-------
a range included a 50 percent reduction in decker/screen room color load




and a 100 percent reduction.  Many of the mills evaluated may have to




achieve a significant, if not total, reduction in the color load from




the decker/screening operation to be able to meet the BATEA effluent




color limitation.









The specific color load used to establish the range for color reduction




from the 50 and 100 percent reduction of color from the decker/screen




room was determined on the basis of the 24 percent average of the total




color load at the secondary treatment influent for this process, which




was calculated in Section III under the bleached kraft mill color




origin.









The average day color load at the influent to the secondary treatment




system for the six mills (only five used to calculate average, mill 117




not used) was 176.5 Kg/KKg (353 Ibs/ton).  Based upon the average of




24 percent of this total color load being contributed by the decker/




screen room, a color load of 42.5 Kg/KKG (85 Ibs/ton) contributed from




this process was calculated.  Therefore, the 50 and 100 percent




reduction in color load from this process would mean an additional




21 Kg/KKG (42 Ibs/ton) and a 42 Kg/KKg  (85 Ibs/ton) reduction in the




after minimum lime treatment color load calculated on Table 45.









This would result in average day BATEA effluent color discharge of




67 Kg/KKg (133 Ibs/ton) and 46 Kg/KKg (90 Ibs/ton) with the 50 and
                               VI-15

-------
100 percent color reduction at the decker/screen room subtracted, res-




pectively.  These discharge loads are for the 49 percent softwood




point of the BATEA effluent color discharge (average day).   Table 47




lists the BATEA effluent color discharge (average day) for mills




pulping 100 percent softwood and also mills pulping 100 percent hard-




wood with a 50 and 100 percent color load reduction from the decker/




screen room accounted for.  Mills processing a mixture of softwood




and hardwood pulp will have BATEA effluent color limitation (average




day) at a value between those listed for 100 percent softwood and 100




percent hardwood.









Table 48 lists the BATEA effluent color discharge (average day) for




the 23 bleached kraft mills included in this study.  These discharge




loads were calculated on the basis of the percent softwood pulp used




by each of the facilities during the color survey period (listed on




Table 1).  Figure 92 shows the plot of the BATEA effluent color dis-




charge (average day) for the bleached kraft subcategory with 50 and




100 percent of the decker/screen room color load removed.









E.   DISSOLVING KRAFT SUBCATEGORY









Two dissolving kraft mills, Mill 127 and 108,  were surveyed during the




pulp and paper mill color project.  Mill 127 and 108 both had BOD raw




waste loads, during the color survey, below the BATEA BOD raw waste




load.
                             VI-16

-------
                             TABLE 47

           BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY)
                          BLEACHED KRAFT
                         100% Softwood Pulp            100% Hardwood Pulp
                         kg/kkg    (Ibs/ton)           kg/kkg     (Ibs/ton)

50% Color Load Reduction
@ Decker/Screen Room       89.5      (179)               45         (89.5)

100% Color Load Reduction
@ Decker/Screen Room       60.5      (121)               30         (60.5)
                             VI-17

-------
                             TABLE 48

      CALCULATED BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE (AVERAGE DAY)
                   BLEACHED KRAFT MILLS SURVEYED
Mill      Percent            BATEA Effluent  Color  Discharge (Average Day)
No.       Softwood       50% Color Reduction           100% Color Reduction
                        @ Decker/Screen Room           @ Decker/Screen Room
100
101
102
103
105
106
107
110
111
113
114
117
118
119
121
122
125
126
134
136
140
161
187
54
40
39
31
53
60
100
30
63
51
25
100
25
42
56
81
92
100
35
60
0
45
0
                        kg/kkg
(Ibs/ton)
69
62.5
62
58.5
68.5
71.5
89.5
58
73
67.5
56
89.5
56
63.5
70
81
86
89.5
60.5
71.5
45
65
45
(138)
(125)
(124)
(117)
(137)
(143)
(179)
(116)
(146)
(135)
(112)
(179)
(112)
(127)
(140)
(162)
(172)
(179)
(121)
(143)
(89.5)
(130)
(89.5)
kg/kkg
(Ibs/ton)
46.5
42.5
42
39.5
46.5
48.5
60.5
39.5
49.5
45.5
38
60.5
38
43
47
55
58
60.5
41
43.5
30
44
30
(93)
(85)
(84)
(79)
(93)
(97)
(121)
(79)
(99)
(91)
(76)
(121)
(76)
(86)
(94)
(110)
(116)
(121)
(82)
(97)
(60.5)
(88)
(60.5)
                               VI-18

-------
                              FIGURE   92
10
.o
o
<
o
IT
O
_J
O
O
               BLEACHED   KRAFT   BATEA

           EFFLUENT   COLOR    DISCHARGE

                           (AVERAGE DAY)
    350(700)-
   300(600)-
7  250(5001-
o
   200(400)-
150(300)-
    100 (200)-

   89.5 (179)
    60.5(121 )

     50(100) -
     0 (0)
              126
             107
                                     X 106
                                          X 105
                                                           v 114
                                                                        187
                                              DECKER/SCREEN
                                                                        187
                                                                    140
                                                                        I40<
                        ROOM

                        AVERAGE DAY WITH IOO% COLOR REDUCTION
                        DECKER/SCREEN ROOM
                                                                       r (700) 350
                                                                       - (600)300
                                                                           -(500)250
                                                                       ^(400)200
                                                                           -(300)150
                                                                       -(200)100
                                                                         ( 100) 50
                                                                         (89.5) 45


                                                                         (60.5) 30
                                                                         [0)0
            100
                    80
                                     60           40

                                    %  SOFTWOOD
20
COLOR LOAD  AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT BEFORE MINIMUM  LIME

TREATMENT OF THE  FIRST  CAUSTIC  EXTRACT

COLOR LOAD  AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT AFTER MINIMUM LIME

TREATMENT OF THE  FIRST  CAUSTIC  EXTRACT
                                                                                   c
                                                                                   o
                                                                                   a
                                                                                   <
                                                                                   o
                         (X
                         O
                         _1
                         O
                         o

-------
The average color load at the secondary treatment influent for the two




dissolving kraft mills was 367 kg/kkg (733 Ibs/ton), while the average




color load at the first stage caustic extraction effluent was 271 kg/kkg




(542 Ibs/ton).  Applying the 80 percent color reduction efficiency of




the minimum lime treatment system to the average first stage caustic




extraction effluent resulted in 217 kg/kkg (434 Ibs/ton) of color load




removed.  Subtracting the color load removed from the average color




load at the secondary treatment influent gave an average day BATEA




effluent color discharge of 150 kg/kkg (300 Ibs/ton).  Determination




of the specific point that this average represented involved calcula-




tion of the average percent softwood pulp bleached by the two dissolving




kraft mills during the color survey at the mills.  This calculation




resulted in an average of 85 percent softwood pulp bleached at the




mills.









The final step in calculating the BATEA effluent color discharge (average




day) for the dissolving kraft subcategory was to determine the color load




to be subtracted from the after treatment (minimum lime) average day




value determined earlier.  The color load contributed by the decker/




screen room was calculated to be 88 kg/kkg (176 Ibs/ton).  This value




was calculated by using the color load at the secondary treatment system




times the average color load contributed by the decker/screen room of




24 percent.
                            VI-20

-------
The 50 and 100 percent discharge reduction from the decker/screen room




was then applied to the average day color load after minimum lime treat-




ment to calculate the BATEA effluent color discharge (average day).  The




limitation was determined to be 106 kg/kkg (212 Ibs/ton) and 62 kg/kkg




(124 Ibs/ton) for the 50 and 100 percent reductions, respectively.









By then applying the previously calculated percent softwood determined




the 100 percent softwood and hardwood pulped limitations were calcu-




lated.  These discharge loads are shown on Table 49.









Figure 93 is a plot of the color loads calculated versus the percent




softwood pulped.  Also included on the plot is the color reduction




achieved at both facilities with minimum lime treatment applied.









F.   SODA SUBCATEGORY









Only two soda mills are presently operating in the United States.  One




of these mills, Mill 152, was visited during the color surveys.  Mill




152 uses basically 100 percent hardwood pulp (approximately 4 to 5




percent of the pulp used at the mill is softwood) in their manufacturing




process.  Mill 151, the other soda mill, is also a 100 percent hardwood




mill.  Therefore, one limit for average day was calculated on the basis




of the color survey at Mill 152.  Mill 152 had an average BOD below the




BATEA raw waste BOD load.
                               VI-21

-------
                             TABLE 49

           BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE  (AVERAGE DAY)
                         DISSOLVING KRAFT
                         100% Softwood Pulp       100% Hardwood Pulp
                         kg/kkg   (Ibs/ton)       kg/kkg    (Ibs/ton)

50% Color Load Reduction  114.5      (229)          57         (114.5)
@ Decker/Screen Room

100% Color Load Reduction  67      •  (134)          33.5       (67)
@ Decker/Screen Room
                             VI-22

-------
a
<
o
o:
o
                                 FIGURE   93
              DISSOLVING    KRAFT   BATEA
          EFFLUENT  COLOR   DISCHARGE
                        -  (AVERAGE   DAY)
    350(700)
    300(600) -
    250(500) -
    200(400) -
    150 (300)



    114.5(229)

    100 (200) '
     67 (134)
     50(100) •
      0(0)
              127
            100
                              X 108
                              1 '
                               108
AVERAGE  DAY WITH IOO% COLOR REDUCTION
DECKER/SCREEN ROOM
                    AVERAGE  DAY WITH 5O% COLOR REDUCTION
                    DECKER/SCREEN ROOM-
    80
60          40
 % SOFTWOOD
20
  COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT BEFORE MINIMUM LIME
  TREATMENT OF  THE FIRST CAUSTIC  EXTRACT
  COLOR LOAD AT SECONDARY TREATMENT INFLUENT AFTER MINIMUM LIME
  TREATMENT OF THE  FIRST  CAUSTIC  EXTRACT
                                                      [700)350
                                                     - (600)300
                                                     u (500)250
                                                     -(400)200
                                                     "(200) 100



                                                      (114.5)57

                                                     \- (100)50

                                                      ( 67 )33.5
                                                      (0)0
                                                 c
                                                 o
                                                                                     V.
                                                                                     in
                                                 O
                                                 <
                                                 O
                                                                 IT
                                                                 O
                                                     -(300)150   o

-------
The average color load at the secondary treatment influent for Mill 152




was 140 kg/kkg (279 Ibs/ton).  The average color load contributed by the




first stage caustic extraction effluent was 73 kg/kkg (145 Ibs/ton).  A




total of 58 kg/kkg (116 Ibs/ton) of color can be removed with the min-




imum lime process at 80 percent efficiency.  The color load at the




secondary treatment influent after minimum lime treatment was 82 kg/kkg




(163 Ibs/ton).









The effect of reducing the decker/screen room discharge by 50 and 100




percent, respectively, was then evaluated.  Based upon the average 24




percent of the total color load from bleach kraft mills at the decker/




screen room a total of 17 kg/kkg (33.5 Ibs/ton) and 33.5 kg/kkg (67




Ibs/ton) was subtracted from the color load after minimum lime treatment




to determine the BATEA effluent color discharge.









The average color load for BATEA effluent color discharge was calculated




to be 65 kg/kkg (129.5 Ibs/ton) at 50 percent color load reduction, and




48 kg/kkg (96 Ibs/ton) with a 100 percent color load reduction at the




decker/screen room.  These color discharge loads are at the 100 percent




hardwood point.









G.   SUMMARY









Table 50 shows the BATEA effluent color discharge (average day) which




were calculated for the bleached kraft, dissolving kraft, and soda




subcategories.  The discharge loads were also plotted on Figure 94.
                               VI-24

-------
                               TABLE 50

         SUMMARY BATEA EFFLUENT COLOR DISCHARGE  (AVERAGE  DAY)


                              100% Softwood        100% Hardwood
Subcategory                   kg/kkg (Ibs/T)       kg/kkg  (Ibs/T)

@ 50% Color Reduction from Decker/Screen Room

Bleached Kraft                 89.5 (179)           45 (89.5)

Dissolving Kraft              114.5 (229)           57  (114.5)

Soda                          130  (259)             65 (129.5)

@ 100% Color Reduction from Decker/Screen Room

Bleached Kraft                 60.5 (121)           30 (60.5)

Dissolving Kraft               67   (134)          33.5 (67)

Soda                           96   (192)           48 (96)
                             VI-25

-------
a<
JC
JC
a
<
o
ac
o
                                 FIGURE   94


         BATEA  EFFLUENT  COLOR  DISCHARGE


                             (AVERAGE  DAY)
     150 (300)-
     130(259)
     1145(229)
100(200)

 96(192)


89.5(179)
 67(1 34)


60.5(121 )
      50 (100)-
         0(0)
                                                                       -(300)150
                                                                            -(200)100
               SODA SUBCATEGORY
               DISSOLVING  KRAFT SUBCATEGORY
               BLEACHED KRAFT SUBCATEGORY
            100
                    80
 I

60
40
 i

20
                                       (129.5) 65


                                       (114.5) 57
                                                                                        c
                                                                                        o
                                                                                   a
                                                                                   <
                                                                                   o
                                      a:
                                      o
                                      _j
                                      o
                                      o
                                                                         (89.5) 45




                                                                         ( 67 ) 38.5

                                                                         ( 60.5) 30
                                                                        0(0)
                                       % SOFTWOOD
                     AVERAGE DAY WITH  50% COLOR REDUCTION DECKER/SCREEN ROOM
                     AVERAGE DAY WITH 100% COLOR REDUCTION DECKER/SCREEN ROOM

-------
                              SECTION VII




         •   COST FOR COLOR REDUCTION AT MODEL MILLS - BATEA









The total annual costs presented in this report for color reduction of




the first stage caustic extraction effluent utilizing the minimum lime




treatment technology are subdivided into two categories, as follows:









     1.   Depreciation and interest (annual cost)




     2.   Operation and maintenance.









Depreciation costs reflect the accounting charges for replacement of the




capital assets over a period of years.  Straight-line depreciation has




been assumed in all annual cost calculations.  Interest is the financial




charges on the capital expenditures for the color reduction facility.




For purposes of this report, depreciation, interest, insurance, taxes,




and spare parts are assumed to be 15.0 percent of the total capital




expenditure.









The operation and maintenance costs are those costs expended for annual




operation of the color reduction facility.  These costs are subdivided




as follows:









     1.   Operator Labor




     2.   Maintenance Labor




     3.   Energy Requirements
                            VII-1

-------
     4.   Chemicals









Operator labor costs are based on the annual manhours required to per-




form the tasks for proper operation, overhead and supervision, and




quality control monitoring for the color control treatment facility.




The maintenance costs are the annual manhours required for preventative




maintenance tasks such as lubrication, equipment inspection, minor parts




replacement, and painting.  It was assumed that major equipment repair




and/or replacement and miscellaneous yard work would be done by the




existing mill personnel.









Chemical usage is based on estimated quantities required to meet pro-




posed effluent limitations,  or as required for proper operation of the




minimum lime system.  The energy requirements are based on the addition-




al horsepower and operating times plus the heat energy required for the




minimum lime technology.









The total annual operating costs presented in this report are the sum of




the annual costs for operator labor, maintenance costs, energy require-




ments, and chemicals.









A.   BASIS FOR MINIMUM LIME TREATMENT COSTS









A minimum lime treatment system to reduce the color of the first caustic




stage extraction effluent was sized and estimated for a 670 TPD model
                           VII-2

-------
mill.  The minimum lime treatment system for which cost estimates were




made represents an entirely independent system from the existing mill




processes and external treatment.  It should be stated that there are




other variations of the minimum lime color control system which are




possible and may be more practical for some mills.









The system would utilize a wastewater transfer pump to transport the




first caustic stage effluent from the bleach plant to the minimum lime




treatment system.  A cost for piping to transport the flow to the treat-




ment system was included (4,000 feet of 16 inch pipe for the 670 TPD




mill).









An inline mixer would then be used to combine a lime slurry, with the




first caustic stage effluent.









For the purpose of the cost estimate a lime dosage of 2,250 mg/1 was




used.  It may be necessary for some mills to add more or less lime,




but the specific amount will depend upon the amount of fiber in the




system, polyelectrolyte used, and the hydraulics of the clarification




step.









The wastewater then flows to a color reduction clarifier with a poly-




electrolyte metered into the wastewater stream prior to the clarifier to




aid in settling the lime precipitate.  Other settling aids such as fiber




fines could also be used at this point in the minimum lime process.
                            VII-3

-------
Sludge from the clarifier would either be sent to a sludge holding and

mixing tank or pumped directly to the lime mud dewatering system.  After

the lime mud has been dewatered to approximately a 60 percent solids

concentration it is transferred to a fluidized bed for drying and cal-

cining.  The reburnt lime is then transferred back to the slaker for

reuse in the color control process.



B.   MODEL MILLS



The cost for the minimum lime system was developed for a 670 TPD mill.

The costs were then calculated for other size model mills on the basis

of a cost to flow relationship.  The size model mills used in the cost

estimate by subcategory are shown below:



     Bleached Kraft

          Market Kraft             350 and 700 TPD
          BCT Kraft                250, 670, and 1300 TPD
          Fine Kraft               250, 670, and 1300 TPD

     Dissolving Kraft              600 and 1000 TPD

     Soda                          300 and 700 TPD



The cost summary at the end of this section will present the cost of a

minimum lime treatment system at these model mills.
                           VII-4

-------
C.   AVERAGE FLOWS









The average flow at the influent to the secondary treatment system and




the first stage caustic extraction effluent were determined for use in




sizing the minimum lime treatment system equipment.  The flows recorded




during the color surveys were used to determine the average flow.  Table




51 shows the determination of these average flows and the percent of the




total flow at the secondary influent represented by the first stage




caustic extraction effluent.
                              VII-5

-------
                               TABLE 51

                      AVERAGE FLOW DETERMINATION
Mill
No.

100
101
102
103
105
106
107
108
110
111
113
114
117
118
119
121
122
125
126
127
134
136
140
152
161
187

Average
Ave. Flow Secondary
Treatment Influent
kl/Kkg
227.35
138.90




187.22
265.28
299.35
249.09
180.58
204.02
176.22
180.95
192.84
109.78
92.98
164.28

120.45
137.15
142.37
224.11
143.05
151.50
75.46
232.59
110.49
102.08
171.17
(Kgal/ton)
(54.39)
(33.23)
—Wr» f- C*amT»l Qrl



(44.79
(63.46)
(71.61)
(59.59)
(43.20)
(48.81)
(42.16)
(43.29)
(46.13)
(26.26)
(39.24)
(39.30)

(28.82)
(32.81)
(34.06)
(53.61)
(34.22)
(36.24)
(18.05)
(55.64)
(26.43)
(24.42)
(40.95)
Ave.
Caustic
kl/Kkg
1.09
7.90
at First
at First
28.59
34.53
23.24
30.93
18.39
12.62
11.91
20.98
12.37
23.70
13.33
26.00

28.63
27.17
40.00
33.77
15.88
21.44
12.04
12.75
13.67
18.85
20.41
Flow 1st
Extract
(Kgal/ton)
(0.26)
(1.89)
Stage Caustic-
Stage Caustic-
(6.84)
(8.26)
(5.56)
(7.40)
(4.40)
(3.02)
(7.85)
(5.02)
(2.96)
(5.67)
(3.19)
(6.22)

(6.85)
(6.50)
(9.57)
(8.08)
(3.80)
(5.13)
(2.88)
(3.05)
(3.27)
(4.51)
(4.88)

Percent of
Total Flow
0.5
5.7




15.3
13.0
7.8
12.4
10.2
6.2
6.6
11.6
6.4
21.6
14.3
15.8
I
23.8
19.8
28.1
15.1
11.1
14.2
16.0
5.5
12.4
18.5
11.9
An average flow of 20.48 kl/Kkg (4.90 Kgal/ton) at the first stage

caustic extraction effluent and 171.38 kl/Kkg (41.00 Kgal/ton) at the

secondary treatment influent was used to size the treatment equipment,
                              VII-6

-------
D.   CAPITAL COSTS









As previously mentioned, the costs were developed on the basis of a 670




TPD mill and a flow relationship was used to calculate costs for the




remaining model mills.  The capital cost was based upon the following




equipment:









     1.   wastewater transfer pump,




     2.   lime storage, slaker, and feed system,




     3.   polyelectrolyte system,




     4.   inline mixers,




     5.   clarifier (thickener),




     6.   sludge pumps,




     7.   sludge holding and mixing tank,




     8.   lime mud dewatering, and




     9.   lime mud incineration.









Capital cost and annual cost based upon depreciation and interest at




15.0 percent of the capital cost were calculated for all of the model




mills previously listed.  These costs are summarized by model mill on




Table 52 at the end of this section.









A plot of the capital cost and annual cost based upon the first caustic




extraction effluent flow is shown on Figure 95.  All capital costs are




based upon February 1978 dollars.
                              VII-7

-------
                                       FIGURE  95


           COST   FOR   TREATING   BLEACH   PLANT


            CAUSTIC   EXTRACT    FILTRATE   WITH


                          MINIMUM   LIME   SYSTEM
  10,000
en

-------
E.   ANNUAL OPERATION COSTS




As stated in the introduction to this section, the annual operation cost

consists of operator labor, maintenance labor, energy requirements, and

chemicals.  Each of these four items of cost will be discussed on the

following pages.




1.   Operator and Maintenance Labor



The operator labor is based on the annual manhours required to perform

the tasks for proper operation, overhead and supervision, and quality

control monitoring, while the maintenance labor cost is based on the

annual manhours required for preventative maintenance tasks such as

lubrication, equipment inspection, minor parts replacement, and
                                                                i
painting.



Existing mill personnel would be able to handle some of these additional

operation and maintenance tasks required for the minimum lime system.

However, the external color control equipment such as the clarification

unit would require additional manpower expenditures.  The number of

additional manhours required is dependent upon the size of the equip-

ment, which in the case of the minimum lime system is dependent upon the

first stage caustic extraction effluent flow.  Estimates of the ad-

ditional manhours required were done for the model mills based upon

their respective flows.  A man year rate of $22,000 was used to determine

the operator and maintenance labor costs for the minimum lime system.

The average non-supervisory labor rate in pulp and paper production
                              VII-9

-------
in February 1978 was $71.4 per hour (referenced from the Bureau of Labor




and Statistics).   This base rate was then increased by 35 percent for




overhead and benefits and 15 percent for labor supervision.  Based on




these factors a yearly rate of $22,000 was used in the cost determina-




tions.









A summary of these operation and maintenance costs by model mill is




shown on Table 52 at the end of this section.  Figure 96 shows a plot of




the operation and maintenance cost as a function of the minimum lime




treatment system capacity.









2.    Energy Requirements









The energy requirements of the minimum lime treatment system include the




horsepower required to operate the color control processes, and the heat




energy required to dry and recalcine the lime mud after filtration.  The




energy requirement for operating the equipment was determined to be 3.91




kilowatt-hours per ton of production (kw-hr/ton) or 794 kw-hr/mgd.  The




operating energy costs were then calculated for the model mills using a




cost of $0.03 per kw-hr.









The heat energy was calculated on the basis of fuel oil as the source of




heat for accomplishing the lime sludge drying.  A heat production of




approximately 146,000 BTU's per gal of fuel oil was used along with a
                              VII-10

-------
                                 FIGURE   96

                    MINIMUM   LIME   TREATMENT

               OPERATION   AND   MAINTENANCE
  1000
   100
en
D
O
X
CO
O
o
    10
     I
     0.38

     (0.10)
              I    I  I   I  I I I I
         I    I  I   I I  I I  I
         I    I
3.78

(1.00)
37.80

(10.00)
378

(100)
                  FIRST CAUSTIC  EXTRACT  FLOW   kkld (mgd)

-------
cost of $3.50 per million BTU's.  Heat energy of 6.5 million BTU per ton




of lime product for incineration was used to calculate heat energy




costs.  For the purpose of determining the quantity of lime sludge,




which must be dried per day, a lime recovery rate of 90 percent at the




clarifier was used.  This results in 28 tons per day of lime as CaO




recovered at the clarifier for the 670 TPD mill.  A solids concentration




of 60 percent after the lime mud filter was also used.









The total energy cost for each model mill is shown on Table 52 at the




end of this section; Figure 97 shows a plot of the total annual energy




cost and the annual operating kilowatt hours required related to the




first caustic extract effluent flow.  The kilowatt-hours per year re-




quired was divided into two plots which show the annual equipment oper-




ating energy and the total operating energy (heat energy plus operating




energy).  The equipment operating energy represents approximately 4.7




percent of the total energy required.









3.   Chemical Cost









The annual chemical cost consists of the lime and polyelectrolyte re-




quired for the minimum lime system.









As mentioned earlier in this section, a lime dosage of 2,250 mg/1 has




been used with a lime recovery in the clarifier of 90 percent.  There-




fore, 10 percent of a mill's daily lime requirement must come from
                              VII-12

-------
                                FIGURE  97
                  MINIMUM  LIME  TREATMENT,
                    ENERGY  REQUIREMENTS
  10,000
O  1000
o
o
z
o
I
CO
o
o

-------
purchased makeup lime (CaO).  A lime cost of $35.00 per ton of lime was


used.






A polyelectrolyte dosage of 3 mg/1 at a cost of $1.00 per pound of


polyelectrolyte was used to determine the polyelectrolyte chemical cost


for each model mill.






A summary of the total chemical cost for the mills is presented on Table
                                                                f

52 at the end pf this section.  Figure 98 is a plot of the chemical cost


related to the flow from the first caustic extraction effluent.





F.   SUMMARY





The capital cost, annual cost (depreciation and interest), operation


and maintenance labor cost, energy cost, and chemical cost for each of


the model mills is presented on Table 52.  The total annual cost (deprecia-


tion and interest plus operation and maintenance labor plus energy plus


chemical cost) is also shown.





A total annual cost range at the model mills of $2.50 to $3.50 per ton


of production resulted from the cost calculations.  The lower cost was


for those model mills producing more (1300 TPD) and the higher cost was


for those producing the lowest level (250 TPD).  The cost for the  670


TPD mill was calculated at $2.85 per ton of production.  Mills that have


10 to 20 percent capacity available in their existing lime systems would


be able to attain significant savings over the cost presented here.
                              VII-14

-------
                                   FIGURE  98

                   MINIMUM   LIME  TREATMENT
                              CHEMICAL   COST
   1000
o
o
O
X
o
o
z
z
<
    100
       I
       0.38
       (0. 10)
               I	I
         I	I
         I	I
3.78
(1.00)
 37.8
(10.0)
378
(100)
                         FIRST  CAUSTIC  EXTRACT  FLOW   kkld  (mgd)

-------
                                                            TABLE 52

                                                  COST SUMMARY FOR MODEL MILLS
      MARKET KRAFT
ETC KRAFT
FINE KRAFT
<
M
M
I
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Size: 350 TPD
$1,273,000
191,000
55,800
133,400
34,400
414,600
Size: 700 TPD
$1,929,000
289,000
84,500
266,700
70,200
710,400
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Size: 250 TPD
$1,033,000
155,000
45,300
92,200
24,900
317,400
Size: 670 TPD
$1,895,000
284,000
83,000
257,600
68,000
692,600
Size: 1300 TPD
$2,820,000
423,000
123,500
497,200
131,600
1,175,300
     1.    Capital  Cost
     2.    Annual Cost  (Depreciation and Interest)
     3.    Operator and Maintenance Labor
     4.    Energy Cost
     5.    Chemical Cost
     6.    Total Annual Cost  (2+3+4+5)
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Mill
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Size: 250 TPD
$1,033,000
155,000
45,300
92,200
24,900
317,400
Size: 670 TPD
$1,895,000
284,000
83,000
257,600
68,000
692,600
Size: 1300 TPD
$2,820,000
423,000
123,500
497,200
131,600
1,175,300
DISSOLVING KRAFT
                                                                               Mill Size:  600 TPD
                                                                               1.
                                                       $1.754.000
2,
3.
4.
5.
6.
263,000
76,800
225,600
59,300
624,700
                                                                               Mill" Size: 1000 TPD
                                                                               1.
                                                                               2."
                                                                               3.
                                                                               4.
                                                                               5.
                                                                               6.
                                                       $2.402,000
                                                          360,000
                                                          105,000
                                                          390,000
                                                          101,500
                                                          956,800
SODA
                                                                       Mill Size:  300 TPD
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
$1,181,000
177,000
51,700
115,300
31,300
375,300
                                                                       Mill Size:  700 TPD
                                               1.
                                               2."
                                               3.
                                               4.
                                               5.
                                               6.
                                 $1.929,000
                                    289,000
                                     84,500
                                    266,700
                                     70.200
                                    710,400

-------
                            SECTION VIII

                            REFERENCES


1.   Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water.
     14th Edition.  American Public Health Association, American Water
     Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington,
     D.C., 1976, p. 64-70.

2.   CPPA Technical Section, "Color of Pulp Mill Effluents," CPPA Std.
     H.5P;  3p. (September, 1974).

3.   Correspondence from Mill 152, July 27, 1976.

4.   Correspondence from Mill 110, September 1, 1976.

5.   Correspondence from Mill,101, May 7, 1976.

5a.  Correspondence from Mill 117, May 20, 1976.

6.   "Development Document for Interim Final and Proposed Effluent
     Limitations Guidelines and Proposed New Source Performance
     Standards for the Bleached Kraft, Groundwood, Sulfite, Soda,
     Deink, and Non-Integrated Paper Mills, Volume 1, Segment of
     the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard, Point Source Category," EPA
     440/1-76/047-a Group I, Phase II (January, 1976) pg. 377-378.

7.   Fuller, R.R., "API's 1975 Environmental Awards," Paper Trade Jr.,
     159 (22) 41 (1975).

8.   Rush, R.J. and Shannon, E.E., "Review of Color Removal Technology
     in the Pulp and Paper Industry," Environmental Protection Service,
     Environment Canada, Report No. EPS 3-WP-76-5, (April, 1976).

9.   Olthof, M.G.; Eckenfelder, W.W., Jr., "Laboratory Study of Color
     Removal from Pulp and Paper Waste Waters by Coagulation," TAPPI 57,
     No. 8:  55-6 (August, 1974).

10.  Olthof, M.G., "Color Removal from Textile and Pulp and Paper Waste
     Waters by Coagulation," Vanderbilt Univ., Ph.D. Thesis 1974; 359 p.
     (Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich; From;  Piss. Abstr. 35, no. 7:
     3359B (Jan.,  1975).

11.  Berov, M.B.,  et al, "Optimum Conditions for Chemical Treatment of
     Effluents," Bum. Prom. No. 2:17 (1975)(Russ.): Abs. Bui. Inst.
     Pap. Chem. 46 (2) 1571 (1975).

12.  Jensen, W.; Meloni, E., "Use of Waste Chemicals in Kraft Mill
     Effluent Treatment," Paper, World Res. Devt.-No., 1974:  46, 48-9,
     52-4.

13.  Nasr, M.S.; Gillies, R.G.; Bakhshi, N.N.; Macdonald, D.G.,
     "Lab-Proven Fly Ash Process Removes Bleach Effluent Color,"
     Canadian Pulp Paper Industry 28, No. 9:  30-32, 35 (September,
     1975).
                            VIII-1

-------
14.  Dugal, H.S.; Church, J.O.; Leekley, R.M.;  and Swanson, J.W.,
     "Color Removal in a Ferric Chloride-Lime System," TAPPI,
     Vol. 59, No. 9 (September, 1976).

15.  Vincent, D.L., "Colour Removal From Biologically Treated Pulp and
     Paper Mill Effluents," Pulp and Paper Pollution Abatement Series,
     CPAR Report 210-1, Canadian Forestry Service, Department of the
     Environment (March 31, 1974).

16.  Soniassy, R.N.; Mueller, J.C.; Walden, C.C. "Effects of Color and
     Toxic Constituents of Bleached Kraft Mill Effluent on Algal Growth,"
     CPPA Environmental Improvement Conference (Vancouver);  85-91
     (October 15-17, 1975).

17.  Herer, D.O.; Woodard, F.E., "Electrolytic Coagulations of Lignin
     From Kraft Mill Bleach Plant Waste Waters," TAPPI 59, No. 1:
     134-136 (January, 1976).

18.  Nicolle, F.M.A.,  Shamash, R., Nayak, K.V., Histed, J.R.,
     "Lime Treatment of Bleachery Effluent," presented at 1976 Inter-
     national Environmental Conference October 6-8, 1976, CPPA.

19.  Dence, C.W.; Luner, P.; Chang, Jr.; Durst, W. ; Hsjeh, J.; Klink-
     hammer, M., "Studies on the Adsorption of Spent Chlorination and
     Spent Caustic Extraction Stage Liquor Color and Organic Carbon
     on Activated Carbon," NCASI Stream Improvement Technology Bul-
     letin, no. 273: 74 p. (March, 1974).

20.  Rankin, P.R. and Benedek, A., "Lignin Adsorption on Activated
     Carbon," Wastewater Research Group Report #73-103-1, Department
     of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University (September, 1973).

21.  Gibney, L.C., "Inroads to Activated Carbon Treatment," Environ-
     mental Science Technology 8, no. 1: 14-15 (January, 1974).

22.  Lang, E.W., et al, "Activated Carbon Treatment of Unbleached
     Kraft Effluent for Reuse," EPA -660/2-75-004 (April, 1975).

23.  Gellman, I.; Berger, H.F., "Current Status of the Effluent De-
     colorization Problem,", TAPPI 57, no. 9: 69-73 (September, 1974).

24.  Ploetz, T., "Purification of the Pulp Industry's Bleachery Ef-
     fluents with Alumina," Papier 28, no. 10A: V39-43 (October, 1974).

25.  Rock, S.L.; Bruner, A.; Kennedy, D.C., "Decolorize Kraft Bleach Plant
     Effluents Effectively with Low-Cost Polymeric Adsorption Method,"
     Pulp Paper International 17, no. 3:66-69  (March, 1975).

26.  "1975 Review of the Literature on Pulp and Paper Effluent Manage-
     ment," NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 284 (February, 1976).

27.  Lingberg, S., "Decolorization of Bleach Plant Effluent and
     Chloride Handling," Paper Trade Journal, p. 36-37 (December,  1973).
                           VIII-2

-------
28.  Charaberlin, T.A.; Kolb, G.C.; Brown, S.F.; Philip, D.H., "Color
     Removal from Bleached Kraft Effluents," TAPPI Environmental
     Conference (Denver), Preprints: 34-45 (May 14-16, 1975).

29.  Correspondence from Dow Chemical received on March 22, 1976.

30.  Burns, C.M., "Review of Membrane Processing of Pulp Mill Ef-
     fluents," Pulp and Paper Pollution Abatement CPAR Project Report
     124-1, Canadian Forestry Service, Department of the Environment,
     March 31, 1973.

31.  Martin, L.F., Industrial Water Purification, Noyes Data Corporation,
     (Park Ridge, N.J. 07656 & London) c!974: 300 p.

32.  Johnson, J.S., Minturn, R.E., and Moore, G.E., "Filtration Tech-
     niques for Purification of Kraft Pulp Mill and Bleach Plant
     Waste," TAPPI, 57, 1, 134, (1974).

33.  Muratore, E.; Pichon, M.; Monzie, P., "Color Removal from Kraft
     Effluent by Ultrafiltration with New Polymeric Membranes,"
     Svensk Papperstid 78, no. 16: 573-576 (November 10, 1975).

34.  Fels, M.; Smith, D.; Miller,  C.; Miller, P., "Ultrafiltration Offers
     'Good' Removal of Color, COD, BOD," Can. Pulp Paper Ind. 27, no. 9:
     50-2 (September, 1974).

35.  Timpe, W.G. and Lang, E.W., "Activated Carbon and Other Techniques
     for Color Removal from Kraft Mill Effluents," Proc. EUCEPA Conf.,
     Rome (May 1973), Abs. Bull. Inst. Paper Chemistry, 45, 2, 1667
     (1974).

36.  Nelson, W.R.; Walraven, G.O.; Morris, D.C., "NSSC Mill with Waste
     Reuse and Reverse Osmosis," TAPPI Environmental Conference (New
     Orleans): 63-71 (April 17-19, 1974).

37.  Bansal, I., "How to Purify Effluents, Recover By-Products with
     Reverse Osmosis," Pulp Paper 49, no. 5: 118-121 (May, 1975).

38.  Gellman, Isaiah, "Draft Effluent Decolorization — A Program for
     Assessment of its Need, Technological Capability and General
     Consequences."

39.  Balhar, L., "Prospects of the Application of Reverse Osmosis in
     the Pulp and Paper Industry," Papir Celuloza, 2£  (11) 257 (1974)
     (Slovak); Abstract Bulletin Institute Paper Chemistry, 45^ (10)
     10742 (1975).

40.  Haye, E.R., and Munroe, V.G., "Kraft Effluent Color Removal by
     Dispersed Air Flotation," Pulp and Paper Mag. Canada, 75, 11,
     61, (1974).
                           VIII-3

-------
41.  Das, B.S., Ontario Research Foundation, "Precipitation-Flotation
     Method of Treating Pulp Mill Effluents," Pulp and Paper Pollution
     Abatement, CPAR Project Report 184-1, Canadian Forestry Service,
     Department of the Environment, September 30, 1973.

42.  Herschmiller, D.W., "Foam Separation of Kraft Mill Effluents,"
     MAS Thesis. University of British Columbia (April, 1972).

43.  Chan, A.; Herschmiller, D.W.; and Manolescu, D.R., "Ion Flotation
     for Color Removal from Kraft Mill Effluents," Pulp and Paper Pol-
     lution Abatement, CPAR Project Report 93-1, Canadian Forestry
     Service, Department of the Environment, March 31, 1973.

44.  Bauman, H.D.; Lutz, L.R., "Ozonation of a Kraft Mill Effluent,"
     TAPPI 57. no. 5: 116-19 (May, 1974).

45.  Nebel, C.; Gottschling, R.D.; O'Neill, H.J., "Ozone: A New
     Method to Remove Color in Secondary Effluents," Pulp Paper 48,
     no. 10: 142-5 (September, 1974).

46.  NCASI, "Preliminary Laboratory Studies of the Decolorization and
     Bacterial Properties of Ozone in Pulp and Paper Mill Effluents,"
     Technical Bulletin No. 269, (January, 1974).

47.  Buley, V.F., "Potential Oxygen Application in the Pulp and Paper
     Industry," TAPPI, Vol. 56, No. 7 (July, 1973).

48.  Prahacs, S.; Wong, A; Jones, H.G., "Amine Treatment Process for
     Decolorization of Pulp Mill Effluents. (1) Laboratory Studies,"
     A.I.Ch.E. Symp.  Ser. 70, no. 139: 11-22 (1974).

49.  Wong, A.; Heitner, C.; and Prahacs, S., "The Amine Treatment
     Process for the Decolorization of Pulp Mill Effluents. (2) Mill-
     Site Studies," Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada.

50.  Lenz, B.L.; Robbins, E.S.; et al., "The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on
     Kraft and Neutral Sulphite Pulp and Paper Mill Aqueous Effluents,"
     Pulp and Paper Magazine of Canada, Vol. 72, No. 2, pg. 75-80  (Feb-
     ruary, 1971).

51.  "A Preliminary Investigation of Radiation Enhanced Oxidation of Pulp
     Mill Effluents for Color Reduction," NCASI Technical Bulletin No.
     271 (February, 1974).

52.  McKelvey, R.D.;  Dugal, H.S., "Photochemical Decolorization of Pulp
     Mill Effluents." TAPPI 58, no. 2: 130-3 (February, 1975).

53.  Nova Scotia Research Foundation, "Biological Treatment Method for
     the Removal of Colour, BOD, and Suspended Solids from Pulp Mill
     Effluents," Pulp and Paper Pollution Abatement Series, CPAR Report
     208-1, Canadian Forestry Service, Department of the Environment
     (March 31, 1974).
                           VIII-4

-------
54.   Chemical Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Vol. 83, No. 27, December 20,
     1976, pg. 19.
                           VIII-5

-------
                             SECTION IX

                           BIBLIOGRAPHY
Akamatsu, I.; Kobayashi, T.; Kamishiuma, H., "Regeneration of Spent
 Granular Activated Carbon Used for Kraft Pulp Waste Treatment;
 Effects of Regenerating Time and Quantity  of Steam on Regenerated
 Activated Carbon," Japan TAPPI 28, no. 7:  329-33  (July, 1974).

Anderson, L.G.; Lindberg, S., "Uddeholm (Forest Industries, Skoghall
 Sweden) Cleans Bleach Effluents and Solves Chloride Removal Question,"
 Pulp Paper Intern. 16, no. 6: 46-7, 52 (June, 1974).

Aschim, O.K.; Wiest, K.C., "Bleach Plant Water Reduction," paper
 presented at Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Air and Stream
 Improvement Conference, Toronto, Ontario (September 23, 1974).

Atkinson, E.S., "Bleach Plant Pollution Abatement  - Where Do We Stand?",
 Canadian Pulp Paper Industry 28, no. 9: 22-24 (September, 1975).

Auer-Welsbach, C., "New Methods of Fresh Water Preparation and Ef-
 fluent Purification in Pulp and Paper Mills," Wochbl. Papierfabr. 102
 no. 8: 293-4, 296 (April 30, 1974).

Basu, A.K., "Advanced and Low-Cost Treatment of Pulp Mill Wastes,"
 Tribune CEBEDEAU (Centre Beige Etude Documentation Eaux) 27,
 no. 371: 419-423 (October, 1974).

Berger, H.F., "Color Loads Associated with  Sulfite and Semi-
 Chemical Operations," Proceedings of the 1974 NCASI Central-Lake
 States and Northeast Regional Meetings, NCASI Special Report No. 76-04
 (April, 1976).

	, "Investigation of Changes in Treated  Effluent Color
 Upon Storage," Proceedings of the 1974 NCASI Southern and West
 Coast Regional Meetings, NCASI Special Report No. 76-01 (Jan-
 uary, 1976).

Black, A.P. and Christman, R.F., J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 55(6): 1963.

Bogoev, S.; Semov, V., "Biological Purification of Effluents From Pulp
 and Paper Mills," Tr. Nil Vodosnabdyavane, Kanalizatsiya, Sanit.
 Tekh. 7, no. 2: 147 54 (1971).

Brecht, W.; Dalpke, H.L., "Basic Considerations of the Closed Mill
 System," Paper 181, no. 8:413, 415-16, 421 (April 17, 1974).

Chou, S.; Sumimoto, M.; Sakai, K.; Kondo, T., "Studies on Magnesium-
 Base Semichemical Pulps. (2). Qualities and Treatment of Waste
 Liquors," Japan TAPPI 29, no. 2:77-83 (February,  1975).

Clarke, J., "Color and Organic Removal from Kraft  Bleachery Effluent
 by Coagulation," PhD Thesis, University of South  Carolina, 1969.
                             IX-1

-------
Collin, G., "A Modern Line for Producing Pulp, Taking into Con-
 sideration Energy, Environment, and Economics," Papel 36: 41-46
 (February, 1975).

Croom, H.C., Owens-Illinois, Inc., "Method of Decolorizing Waste
 Process Liquid Discharged by a Paper Mill," U.S. pat. 3,883,463-
 Issued Sept. 3, 1974.

Croon, I., "Some Advanced Systems for Reducing Pollution in the
 Pulp Industry, Mainly Oxygen Bleaching," Papel 24:50-60 (October,
 1973).

Dorica, J.; Berzins, V.; Prahacs, S., "Color Measurement of Pulp
 Mill Effluents," CPPA Environmental Improvement Conference (Vancouver):
 57-64 (October 1517, 1975).

Dugal, H.S.; Swanson, J.W.; Dickey, E.E.; Buchanan, M.A., "Effect of
 Lime Treatment on Molecular Weight Distribution of Color Bodies
 From Kraft Linerboard Decker Effluents," TAPPI 58, no. 7: 132135
 (July, 1975).

Federal Register, "Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source Category:
 Effluent Guidelines and Standards," Fed. Register 39, no. 104:
 18742-52  (May 29, 1974).

Fiehn, G., "Current Status and Trend of Bleaching Processes and
 Bleaching Technology," Zellstoff Papier 24, no. 1:6-14 (January, 1975)

Firsov, A.I.; Drozdov, N.P.; Malev, V.P. "Final Purification of Bio-
 chemically Treated Effluents from Wood Rosin Plants," Gidroliz.
 Lesokhim. Prom, no. 1:6-7 (1974).

Fremont, H.A., "Color Removal from Kraft Mill Effluents by Ultra-
 Filtration," Proceedings of the 1974 NCASI Southern and West Coast
 Regional Meetings, NCASI Special Report No. 76-01 (January, 1976).

Gellman, I.; Gove, G., "1973 Review of the Literature on Pulp and
 Paper Effluent Management," NCASI Stream Improvement Technology
 Bulletin no. 275: 72 p. (May, 1974).

Hawthorne, S.H.; Rapson, W.H., "Reduction of Lignin Model Compounds by
 Trivalent Uranium," Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 75, no. 6: 82-8 (T234-40)
 (June, 1974).

Haynes, D.C., "Water Recycling in the Pulp and Paper Industry," TAPPI
 57., no. 4: 45-52 (April, 1974).

Howard, T.E., "Swimming Performance of Juvenile Coho Salmon (Oncor-
 phynchus Kisutch) Exposed to Bleached Kraft Pulp Mill Effluent,"
 J. Fisheries Res. Board Can. 32, no. 6: 789-793  (June, 1975).
                            IX-2

-------
              _; Walden, C.C., "Measuring Stress in Fish Exposed to
 Pulp Mill Effluents," TAPPI 57, no. 2:133-5  (February, 1974).

Hwang, C.P., "Carbon and Color Distribution in Various Size Fractions
 of Treated Pulp Mill and Board Mill Waste Effluents" TAPPI 57, no.
 12: 148-9 (Dec., 1974).

Kabeya, H.; Fujii, T.; Kimura, Y., "Studies of Renovation and Pulp
 Mill Waste Water: Pilot-Plant Test for Granular Activated Carbon
 Adsorption of Kraft Mill Waste Water," Japan TAPPI 27, no 11:548-
 53 (November, 1973).

Karelin, Ya. A., Salamatov, Yu. P., "Ozonization of Effluents of
 a Kraft Pulp Mill," Izv. VUZ, Stroit. Arkhitek. 16, no. 7: 136-141
 (1973).

Koseki, M.; Tanaka M., "Advanced Treatment of Chemigroundwood Pulp
 Waste Waters," Japan TAPPI 28, no. 3: 132-5  (March, 1974).

	; Kimura, Y., "Advanced Treatment of Unbleached
 Kraft Pulp Waste Waters," Japan TAPPI 28, no. 4: 145-60 (April, 1974).

Ladmiral, D., "La Cellulose du Pin (France) Reduces Its Sources of
 Pollution," Papeterie 96, no. 12:814-822  (December, 1974).

Lexezynski, C.; Zielinski, J., "Effect of Various Technological Factors
 on the Color of Pulp Mill Effluents," Pizeglad Papier. 30, no. J3:
 290-6 (August, 1974).

McKague, A.B., "Flocculating Agents Derived From Kraft Lignin,"
 J. App. Chem. Biotechnol. 24, no. 10: 607-15 (October, 1974).

McKeown, J.J.; Whittemore, R.C., "Color Perception," Proceedings
 of the 1974 NCASI Southern and West Coast Regional Meetings,
 NCASI Special Report No. 76-01 ( January, 1976).

Maematsu, R., "Water Treatment With Activated Carbon Made From
 Sludge and Waste Paper," Japan Pulp Paper 12, no. 3: 53-8 .(October,
 1974).

Moy, W.A.; Sharpe, K.; Betz, R.G., "New Bleaching Sequence for SBK
 (Semi-Bleached Kraft) Cuts Effluent Color and Toxicity," Pulp
 Paper Can. 76, no. 5: 126-129 (T166-169)  (May, 1975).

Nagaya, K.; Maeda, K.; Nakata, T., "Production of Powdered Activated
 Carbon From Sodium-Base SCP (Semichemical Pulp) Black Liquor  (1)
 Production From Pyrolysis Residue By Stream Activation. (2). Carbon
 Activity and Treatment of Dilute Black Liquor With The Carbon,"
 Japan TAPPI 28, no. 10: 501-6; no. 11: 558-63  (October-November,
 1974).
                            IX-3

-------
National Council of the Paper Industry for Air & Stream Improvement,
 "Engineering Estimate of the Cost to the Paper Industry of Achieving
 Selected EPA National Effluent Limitation Levels," NCASI Stream
 Improvement Tech. Bull, no 270: 142 p. (January, 1974).

Nayak, K.V.; Nicolle, P.M.A.; Histed, J.R., "How to Reduce Bleachery
 Effluent Color," Pulp and Paper Canada, 76 (4), (April, 1975).

	, "Bleachery Effluent Treatment," paper presented
 at Canadian Pulp and Paper Assoc. Air and Stream Improvement Con-
 ference, Toronto, Ontario (September 23, 1974).

Nebel, C.; Gottschling, R.D.; O'Neill, H.J., "Ozone Decolorization
 of Effluents from Secondary Treatment," Paper Trade Journal 158,
 no. 4:24-5 (January 28, 1974).

"1974 Review of the Literature on Pulp and Paper Effluent Management,"
 NCASI Technical Bulletin No., 280 (April, 1975).

Obiaga, T.I.; Ganczarczyk, J., "Biological Removal of Lignin from
 Kraft Mill Effluents: Changes in Molecular Size Distribution,"
 TAPPI 57, no. 2: 137-8 (February, 1974).

Olson, Marc; Luoma, Dick; Wallace, A.T.; and Grimestad, Garry,
 "Percolating Effluent Into Ground Reduces Color at Missoula
 Mill," Pulp and Paper. October 1976.

"Ultrafiltration Looks Feasible for Kraft Effluent Color Removal,"
 Paper Trade Journal 158, no 17:26-7 (April 29, 1974).

"Corrugated Ink and Starch Wastes Meet Environmental Protection Agency
 Standards at St. Regis," Paperboard Packaging 59, no. 12:24, 26, 28-9
 (December, 1974).

Pichon, M.; Muratore, E.; Monzie, P., "Treatment of Alkali Extrac-
 tion Effluents by Ultrafiltration," ATIP Rev. 28, no. 1: 9-15 (1974).

Polcin, Jr., "Non-Destructive Bleaching of Highly Lignified Fibrous
 Materials. (1) Wood Chromophores and Their Destruction," Vyskum.
 Prace Odboru Papiera Calulozy 19, V. 69-73 (1974).

"Proceedings of the 1974 NCASI Southern and West Coast Regional Meetings,"
 Special Report No. 76-01 (January 1976).

Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada, "Delignification Using
 Pressurized Oxygen, Pulp and Paper Pollution Abatement, CPAR Project
 Report 3-2, Canadian Forestry Service, Department of the Environment
 (September 30, 1971).

Rapson, W.H. and Reeve, D.W., "The Effluent-Free Bleached Kraft Pulp
 Mill Part III.  The Present State of Development," paper presented at
 the Alkaline Pulping Conference of the Technical Association of the
 Pulp and Paper Industry, September 11-14, 1972.
                             IX-4

-------
 Rolfe,  O.K.;  Owens-Illinois,  Inc.,  "Method of Decolorizing Paper
  Mill Effluent Liquid," U.S.  pat.  3,883,464- Issued September 3, 1974.

 Rouba,  J.,  "Processing of Sediments from Coagulation Applied  as  the
  Third Stage  of Effluent Purification," Przeglad  Wlok.  29,  no 9:
  452-455 (September,  1975).

 Sameshima,  K.;  Sumimoto,  M.;  Kondo,  T., "Color of Pulp  Industry  Waste
  Liquors.  (5)  Contribution of Wood  Components to  the Color of Waste
  Liquors from Kraft and Sulfite Pulping," J.  Japan Wood Resources
  Society (Mokuzai Gakkaishi)  20, no.  6: 284-9 (June 1974)

	,  "Color  of Pulp Industry Waste Liquors.  (IV).
  Interaction  of Chloro-Oxylignin With Metal Salts.  (2)", Japan Wood
  Resources  Society (Mokuzai Gakkaishi)  20,  no 1:  21-5 (January,  1974).

	,  "Color  of Pulp Industry Waste Liquors.  (6)
 Behavior  of  Color During Waste  Treatments,"  J.  Japan  Wood  Res.  Soc.
 (Mokuzai  Gakkaishi)  21, no.  3:  188-193  (March,  1975).

 Schmidt, H.;  Weigt, G.,  "Selection  of  the Proper Technology for  Sul-
 fite Pulp Mill Effluent Treatment," Vyskum.  Pr.  Odboru Papiera
 Celulozy  19, V 59-64  (1974).

 Sharpe, K.; Moy, W.A.; Styan, G.E., "Modification of Kraft  Bleaching
 Sequences for Pollution Abatement," CPPA Annual Meeting  (Montreal)
 61, Preprints Book B:67-71  (1975).

 Spruill, E.L., "Color  Removal and Sludge Disposal (Process)  for  Kraft
 Mill Effluents," Paper Trade J. 158,  no. 33: 24-7 (August  19, 1974).

        	, "Color Removal and Sludge Disposal Process  for  Kraft
 Mill Effluents," U.S. EPA, Environmental Protection Technology, EPA-
 660/2-74-008; 131 p.  (February, 1974).

	, "Long-Term Experience with Continental  Can's  Color
 Removal System," TAPPI Environmental Conference  (New Orleans):  19-
 24  (April 17-19, 1974).

Stevens, F., "First Pollution-Free Bleached Kraft Mill Gets Green
 Light," Pulp Paper Can. 76, no. 10: 27-28  (October 1975).

Tejera, N.E. and Davis, M.W., Jr., TAPPI 53 (10): 1931 (1970).

Timpe, W.G., "Kraft Bleach Decolorization by a Resin Adsorption  Process,"
 Proceedings of the 1974 NCASI Southern and West Coast Regional
 Meetings, NCASI Special Report No. 76-01 (January, 1976).

Tosaka, K.; Hayashi, J., "Studies of Recovery of Chemicals and
 Manufacture of Activated Substances From Pulping Waste Liquor.
 (2) Use of Softwood Kraft Pulp Waste Liquor,"  Japan TAPPI 29,
 no. 6: 316-323 (June, 1975).
                            IX-5

-------
Vogt, C., "Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines
 and New Source Performance Standards for the Unbleached Kraft and
 Semichemical Pulp Segment of the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills
 Point Source Category," U.S. EPA Kept. 440/1-74-025-a: 353 p. (May,
 1974).

Warren, C.E.; Seim, W.K.; Blosser, R.O.; Caron, A.L.,; Owens, E.L.,
 "Effect of Kraft Effluent on the Growth and Production of Salmonid
 Fish," TAPPI 57, no. 2: 127-32 (February, 1974).

Williams, H.H., "Removal of Kraft Color by Alum Treatment," Proceedings
 of the 1974 NCASI Central-Lake States and Northeast Regional Meetings,
 NCASI Special Report No. 76-04 (April, 1976).

Wong, A., "Physical-Chemical Treatment," Proceedings of Seminars on
 Water Pollution Abatement Technology in the Pulp and Paper Industry,
 Economic and Technical Review Report EPS 3-WP-76-4 CPPA, pg. 125-170
 (March, 1976).

	; Prahous, S., "Treatment of Pulp and Paper Mill Ef-
 fluents Using Physical-Chemical Techniques," paper presented at the
 1976 International Environmental Conference, October 6-8, 1976,
 CPPA.

Wright, R.S.; Oswalt, J.L.; Land, J.G., Jr., "Color Removal From Kraft
 Pulp Mill Effluents by Massive Lime Treatment," TAPPI 57. no. 3:
 126-30  (March, 1974).

Zielinski, J.; Jurkiewicz, S., "Determination of Lignin Compounds in
 Mill Effluents and Surface Waters," Przeglad Papier 30, no. 5: 182-8
 (May, 1974).
                            IX-6

-------
                              SECTION  X




                            ACKNOWLEDGMENTS









The Edward C. Jordan Co., Inc. wishes to acknowledge the assistance and




guidance of the Effluent Guidelines Division of the Environmental Pro-




tection Agency.  Particular appreciation is extended to Mr. Craig Vogt,




Project Officer.









Appreciation is extended to the many companies who granted access to




their mills and treatment facilities, and for providing laboratory space




for the color survey team.  The operating records provided by these




mills contributed greatly to the project.









Appreciation is also extended to the many members of the E.G. Jordan




Company staff for their efforts in gathering, compiling, analyzing,




and assimilating the data for this study.  These staff members included




Don Cote, John Tarbell, Ralph Oulton, Fred Keenan, Fred Stubbert, Pete




Krauss, and Arthur Condren.
                              X-l

-------
        APPENDIX I
FIELD DATA RECORDING SHEETS

-------
NCASI Color Procedure
Mill:
Date:
Adjust pH to 7.6 and filter through 0.8 ^ filter paper
Original
Sample Description PH % T @ 465.0 tnu
1. i
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
«



















-------
                                                  EPA COLOR PROCEDURE-I
Mill:
Date:
                                           pH  of Samples  at  Time of Analysis:_

Sample Description
*
•^
L.
2.
3.
i.
5.
&.
7.
8.
9.
Wavelength, millimicrons
435.5









461.2









544.3









564.1









577.4









.588.7

" ^







599.6


«






610.9









624.2









645.9









%
Sanple










-------
Mill:
EPA COLOR PROCEDURE-it




                     Date:
                                           pH  of Samples at Time of Analysis:_

Sample Description
*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
3- . '
9.
Wavelength, millimicrons
4RQ.S









SIS. 2









529.8









541.4









551.8





-



561.9









572.5


\






584.8










600.8










627.3





















-------
Mill:
EPA COLOR ?P,OCEDURE-III




                     Date:
                                           pH  of Samples at Time of Analysis:,

Sample Description
*
L.
2.
3.
i.
5.
5.
7.
3.
9.
Wavelength, millimicrons
422.2









432.0









438.6









444.4









450.1





-



.455.9









462.0


\






468.7









477.7









495.2










465.0





'




-------
               APPENDIX II
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EFFLUENT
      GUIDELINES COLOR SURVEY FORM

-------
                                                                      Subcategory:
                              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                    EFFLUENT GUIDELINES               Agency: 	_
                                       COLOR SURVEY
I.   Company Name:	 Survey Date:	19_

     Address:	ZIP:	
 •                                     *
     Phone;     /	.   Survey Team (Leader's Name First);     	
     Mill/Corporate contacts (Use asterisk for person to contact re this survey.)
     A.   Approx.  tons/day of principal and waste-significant raw materials.  (Include
          wood type,  major chemicals,  fillers (by major type), dyes (if color-significant)
     B.   Approx.  ton/day of manufactured and purchased pulp:

                                 Tons per day                         Tons per day
                              Mfgd.        Purch.                     Mfgd.      Purch.

     Bleached Kraft           	(  )   	(  ) Deinked(net) (2)	(  )  	(  )
     Unbleached Kraft (1)     	(  )   	(  ) NSSC           	(  )  	(  )
     Bleached Sulfite         	(  )   	(  ) Bleached Soda  	(  )  	(  )
     TJnbl. Sulfite (1)        	(  )   	(  ) Waste Paper    	(  )        (  )
                                                      (not deinked)
     Groundwood (1)           	(  )   	(  ) 	   	(  )  	(  )
     Bleached Groundwood      	(  )   	(  ) 	   	(  )  	(  )

(1)  Do not include bleached,  (2)  Ave. Shrinkage 	%.   Totals 	      	
(  ) Percentage moisture                           Sum of Mfgd. + Purchased       L

-------
                                     Location: _ ] _  Page 2  of 10
     C.   Number of paper machines _ :  pulp dryers
          Approx. tons/day of principal products (include market pulp) :
                                                   Typical Production days/yr:
     Total nominal tons/day of paper	;   Mkt.  pulp:	Attach  daily  tonnage
     records from 7/1/74 to 6/30/75 or other year  to correspond with waste  data below.
     Final discharge into   _;	.  (Receiving water or public  sewer).


II.  Mill Laboratory Testing Procedures (Used in reporting 12-month data).

Temperature;   °F or °C 	


pH:  (a)  glass electrode? 	     Standardization frequency?	
     (b)  Colorimetric? 	


Color:    (a)  NCASI, pH adjusted to	;
          (b)  Standard Methods
          (c)  Other: 	;	.  	.
          Procedure:
Suspended Solids: 	(a) 	Glass Fiber (Std. Methods) 	(b)  NCASI
                 	(c) Asbestos Mat         (d) Other: 	;	'
          Procedure:
BODS;     No. of Dilutions:      •        Source of seed: 	
          Dilution of water:
               Std. Methods Ingredients? 	Source of distilled water
               Routine check for copper? 	Seed Procedure: Std.  Methods?	If no
               describe:	

          D.O. Measurement: Winkler 	.  Electrode 	.
          Standardization method:
          Incubation Temp.  	*	.    Temp checked how often? 	
          No.  days incubated   .	.    Selection of reported results:
                                           (a) ©2 Depletion, mg/1 	min; 	max.
                                           (b) Seed correction? 	
          Procedure:

-------
Mill:
                        Location:
                                                       Page 3 of 10
How often does mill run standard glucose-glutamic acid test:	
Has mill changed above procedures in last 12-months?	 If yes, explain in Sec. VI
Bench Sheets Available for Susp. Solids?   .	for BOD?

Turbidity:     (a)  Jackson candle 	 (b) Turbidimeter
                                                         (c) Other
III. Available Mill Data:  Indicate frequency of mill test.

     A. .  Location (Name and sampling point symbol per sketches)
Location
Flow
TSS
BOD
.  PH
Color
Turb.
Temp.
Other
12-month daily waste records enclosed in duplicate for raw waste?_
charge?	__; intermediate treatment?    	.  If not, when 	
12-month daily tonnage records enclosed?	
                                                           ; final dis-
                                                              Duplicate
                                          If not, when
During 12-month data period, did any process or treatment upset last over 30 days?_
Did this affect data? 	; if yesi explain in Section VI.

-------
Mill:
        Location:
                                 Page A of 10
     B.   Also note any discharges for which routine mill data does not exist, with
          estimates of Flow, BOD, and TSS, and show in sketch.
     C.   Recommended split sampling program.  If possible, select routine mill
          samples for raw waste, final discharge, and intermediate treatment.
     Location
Final Effluent
Secondary Influent	

Primary Influent	

Decker Filtrate	

First Stage Cl? Filtrate
~ ' ~ ~ ~  ^       T "£••

1st Stage Caustic Filtrate
Symbol
Composite
Frequency
Mill Samole

-------
        APPENDIX III
PRODUCTION DATA SUMMARY FORM

-------
                                                                                Mill I.D. No._
                                                                                Subcategory
                                                 PRODUCTION DATA SUMMARY
DATE
  TOTAL
PRODUCTION
 TONS/DAY
                                        BLEACH PLANT PROD.
HARDWOOD
TONS/DAY
SOFTWOOD
TONS/DAY
                                                        PAPER MACHINE PROD.
                                                                     MARKET PULP PROD.

-------
      APPENDIX IV
COLOR DATA SUMMARY FORM

-------
COLOR DATA SUMMARY
                                                            Mill I.D.  No._




                                                            Subcategory
DATE
























SAMPLE POINT













FLOW
(MGD)














4,

\
'
i








1
TOTAL
PRODUCTION
TONS/DAY
























NCASI METHOD
COLOR
(PPM)
























COLOR
»;DAY
























COLOR
#/TON
























EPA METHOD
DOMINANT
WAVELENGTH
(mu)
























HUE










-













LUMINANCE
(X)
























PURITY
«)

























-------
        APPENDIX V
SPLIT SAMPLES RESULTS FORM

-------
                                                              Mill I.D. No.
                                                              Subcategory
                                   SPLIT SAMPLE RESULTS
§>ATE
SAMPLE POINT
                                                                         RESULTS
MILL
E.G. JORDAN
  NCASI

-------
            APPENDIX VI
EPA COLOR SURVEY SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
           QUESTIONNAIRE

-------
 7501900





                                      EPA COLOR SURVEY
^_


    \                         SUPPLEMENTAL DATA QUESTIONNAIRE





 Mill Namr>. 	



 Mill Numbe\r	
 Location
 Mill Contact'*,
           .  .
 Color Survey tw
 The following information must be for the color survey dates shown above.



 1.   WOOD SPECIES)  (Tons /Day)



           A.  Pulped                                    B.  Bleached

      Hardwood       Softwood                 Hardwood            Softwood



 Day 1
                   \


 Day 2



 Day 3







 2.   K OR KAPPA NUMBERS AFTER BROWNSTOCK WASHERS
 3.   SALTCAKE (Pounds/Ton) AFTER BROWNSTOCK WASHERS
 4.   SALTCAKE (Pounds/Ton) AFTER SCREEN ROOM DECKER

                                           i

-------