AD-
    NEUROBEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF CARBON MONOXIDE (CO)
                  EXPOSURE IN HUMANS:
         ELEVATED CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN  (COHb) AND
                CEREBROVASCULAR RESPONSES

                      FINAL REPORT

       Vernon A. Benignus-'-, Matthew  L. Petrovick^

                   and James D. Prah-'-

                      May 19, 1989

          •'•U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Human Studies Division
                Clinical Research Branch
            Research Triangle Park,  NC 27711
                           and
                Department of Psychology
              University of North Carolina
                  Chapel Hill, NC 27599

          ^u.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Neurotoxicology Division
               Systems Development Branch
            Research Triangle Park,  NC 27711

                      Supported by

   U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
         Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701-5012

                 Project Order 81PP1812

          Contracting Officer's Representative
                   MAJ David L. Farmer
            Health Effects Research  Division
U.S. Army Biomedical Research and Development Laboratory
              Approved for public release;
                 distribution unlimited
The findings in this report are not to be  construed  as  an
     official Department of the Army position unless
        designated by other authorized documents.

-------
                                            AD-
    NEUROBEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF CARBON MONOXIDE (CO)
                  EXPOSURE IN HUMANS:
         ELEVATED CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN (COHb)  AND
                CEREBROVASCULAR RESPONSES

                      FINAL REPORT

       Vernon A. Benignus , Matthew L. Petrovick^

                   and James D. Prah-'-

                      May 19, 1989

          1-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Human Studies Division
                Clinical Research Branch
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                           and
                Department of Psychology
              University of North Carolina
                  Chapel Hill, NC 27599

          ^u.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Neurotoxicology Division
               Systems Development Branch
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

                      Supported by

   U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
         Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701-5012

                 Project Order 81PP1812

          Contracting Officer's Representative
                   MAJ David L. Farmer
            Health Effects Research Division
U.S. Army Biomedical Research and Development Laboratory
              Approved for public release;
                 distribution unlimited
The findings in this report are not to be construed  as  an
     official Department of the Army position unless
        designated by other authorized documents.

-------
sgcllAiTV CLASSIFICATION of THI$ PAGE
                      REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
                                                                             OM8 Ha. 0704-0188
la. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
 Unclassified
                                   1b. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS
2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY
2D. ^CLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE
                                   3. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF REPORT
                                   Approved for public  release: distribution
                                   unlimited
  PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)
                                   5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)
M. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
 U.S. Enviroamental  Protection
 Agency
                   66. OFFICE SYMBOL
                      (If appticabto)
               7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION
                U.S.  Army  Biomedical Research
                Development Laboratory
              and
6c ADDRESS (City, SU», and ZIFCodt)
 Human Studies Division
 Clinical Research Branch
 Research Triangle Park,  NC  27711
                                   7b. ADDRESS (Crty, StaM, and ZIPCodt)
                                    Fort  Detrick
                                    Frederick,  MD 21701-5010
 la. NAME OF FUNDING /SPONSORING
   ORGANIZATION  U.S. Army Medical
 Research & Development Command
                   8b. OFFICE SYMBOL
                     (If appticaofe)
              9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

               Project Order B1PP1812
8c ADDRESS (City. Stat», and ZIP Code)
  Fort Detrick
  Frederick, MD  21701-5012
                                   10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS
                                   PROGRAM
                                   ELEMENT NO.
                                   62777A
                          BH&62
                          777A878
TASK
NO.
                                                                         CA
WORK UNIT
ACCESSION NO.
             287
11. TITLE (todud* Security OuiMIutb.^ NEUROBEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF  CARBON  MONOXIDE (CO)  EXPOSURE
     IN  HUMANS: ELEVATED  CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN  (COHb)  AND CEREBROVASCULAR  RESPONSES
12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)
  Vernon  A.  Benignus, Matthew L. Petrovick and James D.  Prah
13a. TYPE OF REPORT
  Final  Report
          1136. TIME COVERED
           FROM  1985   TO 1983
             14. DATE OF REPORT (»ar, A«ontn,Oay>
             	1 qqp  Mav 23
    15. PAGtCOUNT
      58	
16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION
17.
             COSATI COOES
   FIELD
  06
           GROUP
             u/
14
        SUB-GROUP
18. SUBJECT TERMS (Conttnu* on rtwnv if rwctnan/ and Mtntrfy by otodr nwnter)
 Carbon Monoxide, CO, Carboxyhemoglobin  (COHb),
 Brain Blood Flow, Cerebrovascular
19. ABSTRACT (Continue on rtwrw H mnsuty and Mtnmy by otodc numter)
                A  two-channel  cranial  impedance plethysmograph  (CIP)  was
          designed and  constructed as  a noninvasive measure of  brain blood
          flow (BBF) in man.   The  instrument was  designed to  reduce  some  of
          the problems  with  instability and difficulty  of use  found  in
          earlier  commercially-available  models.  The CIP has  been
          previously validated against other measures of BBF.
                During  carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) formation, BBF  is known to
          increase.   When BBF increases it  compensates  for the  reduced
          ability  of the blood to  carry oxygen in the presence  of COHb.
          Fifteen  men  breathed carbon  monoxide (CO) to  produce  increases  in
          COHb values  ranging from endogenous 18.4%.  Increased COHb was
          significantly related to a  relative increase  in BBF  (p <  0.019).
          Data from a  similar experiment  on dogs  was obtained  from  Richard
                                                           continued,  next  page
20. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT
GO UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED El SAME AS RPT. Q OTIC USERS
'2* NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL
' " Mary Frances Bostian
21. ABSTRACT SE.QJRITY CLASSIFICATION
Unclassified
22b. TELEPHONE f/ndud* Ana Cod*)
301/663-7325
^mr*
 O Form 1473, JUN 86
                                                  SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Of THIS PAGE

-------
ABSTRACT Ctd.
Traystman for reanalysis and comparison to human results.  Human
and dog data did not differ significantly in the relation to
increased COHb.  Various tests demonstrated that the CIP is a
reliable device.  It was also shown that the information in the
two CIP channels (left and right sides of the head) is redundant
with respect to increased COHb. There was a substantial amount of
scatter about the line of best fit.  Some subjects (both humans
and dogs) did not show increased BBF with high-level COHb.  It
was hypothesized that subjects who sufficiently increased BBF
would not be behaviorally affected by COHb.  Subjects whose BBF
did not increase after exposure would not, hypothetically, have
compensated and would therefore show behavioral impairment.  The
importance of testing the hypothesis with future work was
emphasized.
                               111

-------
                             FOREWORD

Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are
those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S
Army.

  X  Where copyrighted material is quoted, permission has been
obtained to use such material.

     Were material from documents designated for limited
distribution is quoted, premission has been obtained to use the
material.

  X  Citations of commercial organizations and trade names in
this report do not constitute an official Department of Army
endorsement or approval of the products or services of these
organizations.

     In  conducting research using animals, the investigator(s)
adhered  to the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals", prepared by the Committtee on Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Resources,
National Research Council (NIH Publication No. 86-23, Revised
1985)

  X  For the protection of human subjects, the investigator(s)
adhered  to policies of applicable Federal Law 45 CFR 46.

     In  conducting research utiliing recombinant DNA technology,
the  Tnvestigaor(s) adhered to current guidelines promulgated by
the  National Institute of Health.
     The manuscript has been  reviewed by the Health Effects
Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
approved for publication.   Mention of trade names or commercial
products does not  constitute  endorsement or recommendation for
use.

-------
                         EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



     The present document contains (a) a brief review of the



literature regarding increased brain blood flow (BBF) in response



to elevated carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), (b) a description of an



instrument to measure BBF in humans in a noninvasive manner and



(c) a report of an experiment in which BBF was measured in a



group of men with various COHb levels.



     It is a well-established fact that, in dogs and sheep, BBF



increases as COHb is formed.  This statement originates from



experiments involving invasive, direct measurement of blood flow



in the arterial blood supply to the brain.  The increased BBF is



hypothesized to provide a compensatory mechanism for the



reduction in oxygen-carrying capacity of blood when COHb is



present. The BBF compensation is (in group averages) adequate to



compensate for both the lost oxygen-carrying capacity and a



shifted oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve.



     If compensation were adequate in all subjects at all times



and for all parts of the brain, then there should be no



behavioral effects of COHb unless there is some other mechanism



than hypoxia by which COHb produces behavioral effects.  Review



of behavioral experiments implies that below 20 - 30% COHb little



reliable effect on average performance is noted in healthy, young



men at rest, who are not simultaneously exposed to other



toxicants.  It has also been shown that oxygen consumption in the



brain does not begin to decline until after about 20 - 30% COHb.



Thus, there is apparent agreement between the behavioral



literature and the compensatory BBF data.

-------
     An instrument was designed and constructed to measure BBF in



man.  The device is a cranial impedance plethysmograph (CIP).



This method of measurement of BBF had previously been



standardized against other, more traditional methods of BBF



quantification by other researchers.  The instrument and data



reduction methods were tested in the present experiment.  While



no measure of BBF in ml/min can be made with the CIP, it is



possible to calculate the relative change in BBF, R(BBF).  This



is a dimensionless unit which is commonly used in the BBF



literature -



      To test the method of BBF measurement, fifteen men breathed



air and carbon monoxide (CO) mixtures from a Douglas bag.  CO



concentrations in parts per million (ppm) in the bag were



calculated and mixed to produce COHb levels ranging from



endogenous to 19%.  The BBF was measured before and after



exposure and R(BBF) was computed for each subject.  No behavior



was measured.



     The R(BBF)  increased as a function of COHb.  The slope and



intercept of the regression function in humans were compared to a



function fitted  to data from  Richard Traystman in dogs.  There



was no significant difference between the two functions.  A



single function  was fitted to the combined dog and human data.



     A notable feature of the R(BBF) data was its wide scatter



about the line of best fit.  Some subjects did not exhibit



compensatory increases while others appear to have



overcompensated. This was true of both humans and dogs.  It was



hypothesized that those subjects not compensating for COHb might

-------
be behaviorally impaired by the COHb.  The subjects who do



compensate would show reduced or no behavioral effects.  If this



hypothesis were demonstrated, it could lead to the description of



a population of subjects who are especially sensitive to



behavioral impairment by COHb.  No test of this hypothesis could



be performed with the present data set.

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD	 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	 2
LIST OF FIGURES	 6
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS	 7
INTRODUCTION	 8
     BBF RESPONSE TO ELEVATED COHb	 8
          The Compensatory Mechanism Hypothesis	 8
          Implications of Compensatory mechanism	 9
          Assumption 1	10
          Assumption 2	10
          Assumption 3	11
          Assumption 4	11
          Assumption 5	11
     BBF COMPENSATION AND BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS	11
     PURPOSE OF THE PRESENT STUDY	13
METHODS	13
     SUBJECTS	13
     INSTRUMENTATION	14
          Cranial Impedance Plethysmograph (CIP)	14
          Display and Recording	18
     CO EXPOSURE	18
     PROCEDURE	19
     CIP DATA REDUCTION	21
     STATISTICS	23
RESULTS	23
     R(BBF) AS A FUNCTION OF INCREASED COHb ( ACOHb)	24
     EXPLORATORY EXPERIMENTS AND ANALYSES	24
          Comparison of Human and Dog Data	24
          Number of CIP Cycles Required	25
          Differences Between Channels	26
DISCUSSION	27
     R( BBF ) AS A FUNCTION OF ACOHB	27
     IMPLICATION OF OBSERVATIONS ABOUT BBF ON BEHAVIOR	28
     HUMAN VS . DOG  R ( BBF )	28
     OTHER EXPLORATORY RESULTS	30
     CONCLUSIONS	30
TABLE 1	32
GLOSSARY	33
FIGURES	34
LITERATURE CITED	39
APPENDIX - TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CRANIAL
IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPH  (CIP) INSTRUMENT	41
     INTRODUCTION	42
     SYSTEM DESCRIPTION	43
     IMPEDANCE DISPLAYS AND OUTPUT CONNECTORS	44
     SUBJECT ELECTRICAL SAFETY	45
     FRONT PANEL CONTROLS	45
     REAR PANEL CONNECTIONS	47
     INITIAL SETUP	47
     OPERATION	48
     SPECIFICATIONS	50
DISTRIBUTION LIST	53

-------
                           LIST OF FIGURES
Figure                Figure Heading                   Pa9e
No.

1.  Plots of the two-channel CIP and the ECG	33

2.  Diagram of the CIP wave and its first
    derivative, showing the measurements of A,
    A', T and t.  These measurements are used to
    compute the derived measure, F, as defined
    by Jacquy et al.  (1974 )	34

3.  Scatter plot and  fitted function for the values
    of R(BBF) as a function of ACOHb for 14 men	35

4.  Scatter plot and  fitted function for the values
    of R(BBF) as a function of ACOHb for 14 dogs	36

5.  Scatter plot and  fitted function for the values
    of R(BBF) as a function of ACOHb for the pooled
    data of 14  men and 14 dogs	 37

-------
                      TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS

BBF       Brain blood flow.  Also see R(BBF).

CIP       Cranial impedance plethysmograph, an instrument or its
          output which measures an analog of brain blood
          flow by measuring the cranial electrical
          bioimpedance changes.

CO        Carbon monoxide, an invisible, odorless gas which is
          the product of incomplete combustion.

COHb      Carboxyhemoglobin, a measure of the level of carbon
          monoxide in the blood.

p         Probability of an event or outcome of a test of
          statistical significance.

R(BBF)    Relative change in brain blood flow.

ppm       Parts per million.

r         Correlation coefficient (Pearson product-moment).

-------
                          INTRODUCTION



     The present document contains (a) a discussion of the data



regarding increased brain blood flow (BBF) in response to



elevated carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), (b) a description of an



instrument to measure an analogue  of BBF in humans in a



noninvasive manner and (c) a report of an experiment in which an



analogue  of BBF was measured in a group of men with various



levels of COHb.



BBF RESPONSE TO ELEVATED COHb



     The Compensatory Mechanism Hypothesis.  The most definitive



and quantitative information about the BBF response to COHb is



contained in a review and summary of a series of experiments



performed in Richard Traystman's laboratory (Jones & Traystman,



1984). From this work, involving invasive, direct measurement of



flow in the brain arterial supply in dogs and sheep, it appears



that as COHb increases there is a corresponding proportional



increase in BBF.  The rise in BBF is apparently due to brain



vascular dilation.



     As COHb increases, the blood's ability to carry oxygen (©2)



is diminished in direct proportion.  The effect of the increased



BBF is to tend to compensate for the reduced 02~carrying capacity



of the blood.  Thus, the BBF response to increased COHb can be



teleologically regarded as a compensatory mechanism.



     When COHb increases, not only is the 02~carrying capacity of



the blood reduced, but the ©2 dissociation curve is also shifted



to the left (Lambertsen, 1980).  The effect of the shift in the



dissociation characteristic is to decrease the amount of 02 which

-------
is unloaded from the blood into the tissue (Lambertsen, 1980).



If a compensatory mechanism is to be adequate to maintain an



unchanged 02 delivery to the tissues, then BBF must rise by more



than the decreased (^-carrying capacity due to COHb because there



must be sufficient additional 02 delivered to also compensate for



the more difficult 02 unloading.



     The issue of adequacy of the compensatory BBF mechanism has



also been addressed by Jones and Traystman (1984).  Two lines of



argument are offered as evidence that the compensation is



sufficient to maintain unchanged 02 supply to tissue even in the



face of 20 - 30% COHb.  First, the mean increase in BBF which was



observed in subjects was larger than needed to compensate for the



reduced 02~carrying capacity, thus possibly reflecting a change



great enough to also compensate for the increased difficulty in



unloading 02 from blood to tissue.  Second, the mean ©2



consumption of the whole brain was not observed to fall for



elevated COHb values in the above range.  Jones and Traystman



therefore hypothesized that the brain vasodilation is the



effector part of a closed-loop 02 regulation system.



     Implications of Compensatory Mechanism.   It is potentially



important to study BBF compensation for COHb elevation in humans.



If whole-brain ©2 delivery is regulated at the tissue level in



the face of increasing COHb, brain function should not be



impaired.  The preceding statement rests upon a number of



assumptions which are explicated and discussed below, but which



have not been tested.

-------
     Assumption 1:  Regulation of 02 supply at the tissue level



is homogenous across all regions of the brain.  This is not



likely to be an exactly accurate assumption.  Even if the



assumption were not valid in detail, but deviations in regulation



were small, the function of brain regions might not be disturbed



because of redundancies within the regions.



     Differences in vasodilatory responses to COHb across brain



regions were reported in sheep (Koehler et al., 1984) and in cats



(Okeda et al.,  1987).  It is possible that the differences in



regional BBF response to COHb were proportional to 02 utilization



rate and therefore appropriate to the demand.  However, the BBF



in one area of the brain, the neurohypophysis, has been shown to



be unresponsive to COHb (Hanley et al., 1986; Wilson et al.,



1987).  Too little data are available to assess the implications



of the findings or the effect of deviations from the assumption.



To the extent that the above assumption is violated to an



important degree, behavioral effects of carbon monoxide (CO)



could occur despite compensatory action.



     Assumption 2; Regulation remains effective over the entire



exposure duration.  A number of other compensatory mechanisms do



not behave in a the above manner, e.g.  the brain vasoresponse to



hypoxic hypoxia (Krasney et al., 1984;  Manohar et al., 1984) and



for reduced carbon dioxide  (C02), (Albrecht et al., 1987;



Raichele et al. , 1970).  The BBF response in  the above cases



declined over the course of hours or days, depending upon the



conditions.  It is not, however, clear that the decline of the



BBF response represents a failure of compensatory mechanisms so
                              10

-------
much as it represents some other, more long-term adaptive



mechanism coming into play.  No data on the duration of the BBF



response to COHb elevation are available.



     Assumption 3: Regulation is equally effective for all



subjects and all occasions of measurement.  Again, there are no



relevant data for CO in the peer-reviewed literature.



     Assumption 4: There would be a behavioral decrement if there




were a decrease in 02 supply.  It is not certain that a decrement



in brain function would occur if the 02 supply were slightly



decremented.  Brain tissue could increase its 02 extraction to



further compensate.  No data are available on this possibility.



     Assumption 5;  The neurotoxic effect of CO exposure is



entirely due to the hypoxic consequences of COHb formation.



There is evidence that CO hypoxia is not the only mechanism by



which CO produces effects  (Piantadosi et al., 1987).  The latter



is apparently important only at high CO concentrations, however.



If other toxic mechanisms played an important role, the BBF



compensatory mechanism might be only partly effective.  Current



evidence seems to indicate, however, that other mechanisms have



only very small effects under conditions of exposure of interest




in this document.



BBF COMPENSATION AND BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS.



    Benignus et al. (1989) reanalyzed reports of behavioral



effects of COHb elevation.  They concluded that the effects of



COHb less than ca. 20% on brain function were small or absent.




The conclusion was limited to normal, healthy, young males, who




were not simultaneously exposed to other toxicants, under minimal
                              11

-------
physical work conditions.  This is the conclusion which would be



expected from the compensatory mechanism hypothesis and data as



outlined above (if all assumptions are valid) because brain ©2



supply is held constant by the compensatory mechanism and the ©2



consumption does not fall below 20 - 30% COHb.



     The conclusion of Benignus et al. (1989) was tempered by



some less formal observations.  It appears that in nearly all of



the reports of behavioral effects of elevated COHb, there were



slight (but not statistically significant) elevations of mean



behavioral error scores for COHb values less than 20%.  It also



appears that if data from individual subjects are examined, some



subjects demonstrated decrements in performance while others did



not or did so to a lesser extent (authors' own observations and



those of Steven Horvath, 1989).  The latter observation could



explain the slight elevations in mean behavioral error scores and



produce a high variance among subjects.  If the above less formal



observations were true, the conclusions of Benignus et al. (1989)



should be re-stated.  It is possible that some subjects respond



to COHb elevation while others do not, or respond some of the



time and not other times.  Thus, it is possible that in the



individual, if not in the group means, the effects of COHb



elevation could be large and important.



     The compensatory vasodilation hypothesis (above) is based



upon data from group averages, as are behavioral conclusions.



Assumptions made about the compensatory process regarding equal



effects for all subjects and constant effects over time



(assumptions number 2 and 3) may not hold.  If either or both of
                              12

-------
the assumptions do not hold, some subjects may not fully



compensate at all times and thereby show behavioral effects of



COHb elevation.  No data are available to assess the validity of



the various assumptions and it was therefore considered important



to devise and test a method to collect such data in a noninvasive



way in humans.



PURPOSE OF THE PRESENT STUDY




     The compensatory vasodilation hypothesis may well be



important to the issue of the mechanism of COHb effects (or non-



effects) on brain function.  No recent data are available on



brain vasodilation due to COHb elevation in humans.  Thus, it is



not known if humans exhibit the same extent of compensatory



response as do dogs and sheep.



     The present study was designed to (a) devise a modern, non-



invasive method of estimating human BBF (b) expose humans to CO



while measuring BBF and (c) compare results to data in dog.  Even



though the eventual application of BBF data would be to the



prediction of behavioral effects, no behavioral data were



collected in this study.  It was not deemed prudent to obtain



behavioral data until the newly-designed cranial impedance



plethysmograqph) (CIP) instrument and methods had been



demonstrated to yield reliable and plausible results.



                              METHODS




SUBJECTS



     Subjects were 15 men, aged 18.8 - 33.6 yrs (mean = 25.1,




SD = 4.52).  Subjects weighed from 68.0 - 92.5 kg  (mean = 80.6,




SD = 7.50), and were from 170.2 - 189.2 cm tall (mean = 179.3,
                              13

-------
SD = 5.70).  Recruitment for participation was by public



advertisement.  Each subject was paid $36 plus travel costs for



participation.  Informed consent was obtained by written



statement and by oral exchanges.  For the protection of human



subjects, the investigators have adhered to the policies of



applicable Federal Law 45CFR46.  The protocol was approved by



Human Use Review Office of the Department of the Army, Office of



the Surgeon General, by the Committee on the Protection of the



Rights of Human Subjects of the School of Medicine, University of



North Carolina at Chapel Hill as well as by the Research Ethics



Committee of the Department of Psychology of the University of



North Carolina at Chapel Hill.



INSTRUMENTATION



     Cranial Impedance Plethysmograph (CIP).  The instrument



which was used to estimate human BBF used the impedance



plethysmograph principle.  Earlier versions of such instruments,



also called rheoencephalographs (Jenkner, 1962), were unstable



and difficult to use.  The present CIP instrument was developed



jointly by the second author of the present report and personnel



at the Research Triangle Institute in Research Triangle Park, NC.



Modern solid state technology was used and, as a result, the



device is extremely stable, reliable and simple to use.  A



detailed description and evaluation of the CIP is given in the



Appendix.  The principles of operation of the CIP are discussed




in the following paragraphs.



     The impedance of the cranium fluctuates in a pulsatile




manner, synchronized with the cardiac cycle.  Figure 1 is a plot
                              14

-------
of the left and right CIP wave along with the electrocardiogram



(ECG).  Quantitative measures derived from the CIP have been



developed by various investigators and related to BBF by



comparison with other, more standardized, measures.



Quantification is usually preceded by ensemble averaging of the



CIP waves to reduce the influence of artifacts and presumably



random deviations which occur from wave to wave.  Measures are



then performed on the ensemble-averaged CIP wave.  The following



is a brief review of the relevant literature.



     Jacquy et al.  (1974) defined a derived CIP measure and



compared it to measures of BBF made simultaneously on the same



human subjects via  the xenon clearance method.  The derived



measure  (F), a descriptor of brain blood flow, was made in 37



persons whose BBF was manipulated with injections of papaverine



and by CC>2 inhalation.  F was calculated from measures made on



the ensemble-averaged CIP waveform and its first derivative as



shown in Figure 2.  The CIP was averaged over 30-100 cycles.  The



equation for F is given as follows, without the calibration



coefficients, which were eliminated for clarity.



                F = [A/t(A')]/T



Terms in the above  equation are defined in Figure 2.  The data



revealed that F was correlated with the xenon clearance measure



of gray-matter BBF  (r = 0.95).



     A simpler derived CIP measure was compared to BBF as



measured by a radioisotope venous dilution method using 20




patients of various cerebral ischemic disturbances  (Hadjiev,



1968).  The CIP quantification consisted of the time to peak
                               15

-------
divided by the total wave time as measured on the un-averaged CIP



wave.  The ratio was averaged for five cycles of CIP waves for



each subject.  The two measures of BBF were not conducted



simultaneously but in close temporal contiguity.  The measures



correlated well (r = 0.81).  Possibly the correlation was not as



high as that demonstrated by Jacquy et al. (1974) because of (a)



the fewer cycles averaged (b) the non-simultaneous measurement of



BBF by the two methods (c) the possibly lower range of BBF values



which occurred in the patients or (d) the different derived



measure of CIP which was used.



     BBF as measured by the xenon clearance method was compared



to CIP quantified from the ensemble average of 16 waves (Colditz



et al., 1988).  Subjects were nine infants on artificial



ventilation whose PaCC>2 altered their BBF.  The amplitude of the



averaged CIP was used as the measure.  A low correlation



(r = 0.67) was observed.  Such a low correlation could have



resulted from  (a) the small number of cycles averaged (b) the



small number of subjects studied (c) the possibly small range of



BBF which occurred or (d) the particular derived measure of CIP



may have been  innapropriate.



     No absolute value of BBF can be computed from the impedance



measure, but presumably relative changes are accurately



portrayed.  Thus, if a measurement of CIP is taken as a baseline,



before administration of a substance which may be a cerebral




vasodilator  (e.g. CO), and the measurement is repeated while the




subject is under influence of the vasodilator, then the relative



change in the  CIP measure is the same as the relative
                               16

-------
vasodilation.  The foregoing is true if the measure of CIP is a



linear function of BBF.  The assumption of linear relationship to



BBF appears to be valid for the measures of CIP proposed by



Jacquy et al.  (1974 ) .



     From the positioning of the electrodes and knowledge of



cranial anatomy, most of the variation in the CIP may be assumed



to be due to BBF although contamination by extra-brain (scalp)



blood flow is possible.  The effect of extra-brain blood flow



contamination of the impedance measurement depends upon the



relative volume of such flow and its variability with respect to



COHb.  The following is a logical evaluation of the possible



effects of extra-brain blood flow on the CIP.  If extra-brain



blood flow does not vary as a function of COHb, or varies in the



same way as BBF, then  it will not affect the CIP measure.  If it



varies inversely with  BBF, then the measurement of impedance



would be attenuated, but proportional to BBF.  If it varies non-



systematically with respect to COHb then the impedance measure



would be made more variable, but the mean CIP values would still



be well related to BBF.  Thus, it may be argued on strictly



logical grounds that even if extra-brain blood flow contamination



were present in the impedance measure, the measure would still be



a good analogue of BBF in terms of the mean measurement.



     The influence of  scalp blood flow was tested in 15 subjects



by Jevning et al.  (1989).  They computed various measures from



the averaged CIP, among which was the F measure of Jacquy et al.




(1974).  The CIP measures were taken with and without a




constrictive band around the head to temporarily stop scalp blood
                               17

-------
flow. Differences between conditions were extremely small,



indicating that scalp blood flow was a negligible component of F.



     Display and Recording.  The pulsatile signals of the CIP



were displayed along with the EGG and an eye movement channel, on



a Grass model 7 D polygraph with the low frequency time constant



set at 0.15 Hz (half amplitude point) and high frequency filter



set at 40 KHz. The high frequency cutoff is not critical beause



the output of the present CIP instrument contains so little



noise.  The outputs of the two Grass amplifiers for the CIP were



digitized by a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter at the rate of



100 samples per sec.  Digitized data were stored on disk in an



IBM PC/XT.  Computation of F was performed by the IBM PC/XT via



an offline program written by the senior author of the present



document.



CO EXPOSURE



     During the experiment each subject breathed sufficient CO



designed to produce one of three approximate COHb levels;



endogenous, 12.5 or 17.0%.  Exposure to CO was achieved by having



subjects breathe air/CO mixtures from a Douglas bag.  The



concentration in the bag was fixed for each of three groups at



either 0, 6,000 or 9,600 ppm.  The total bag volume was 30 1.  No



effort was made to achieve particular COHb levels for each



person by, e.g., using physiological variables to compute the



amount of CO required.  It was considered desirable, for



regression analysis purposes, to have a more-or-less continuous



distribution of COHb than to achieve 3 distinct groups.  Bags




were prepared by an experimenter who had no contact with the
                              18

-------
subject.  Neither the subject nor those experimenters in contact



with the subject were informed of the bag contents until after



the experiment.



PROCEDURE




     Before being accepted into the study, potential subjects



were given routine physical examinations with special attention



to cardiac health.  Following this, if no problems were detected,




they were given a twelve-lead resting ECG.  If no problems were



noted,  they were given a standard Bruce exercise ECG.  Only



persons who showed no signs of abnormality of any kind were



accepted for study.



     Subjects  arrived in the laboratory between 0830 and 0930 and



were given a brief physical examination by a physician.



Following informed consent, pre-exposure blood was drawn and



Beckman silver-silver chloride (1 cm diameter) electrodes were



attached to the subject's head using EC-2 electrode paste.



Excitation signal (100 kHz, 4 ma) was applied between two



electrodes, one attached immediately above inion, the other



attached to the center forehead, 5 cm above nasion.  Reference



leads for the  two impedance measurement channels were attached to



each mastoid process.  The two inputs of the impedance



measurement channels were attached to the forehead, 5 cm above



nasion  and 4 cm on each side of midline.



     After electrode preparation, a subject was seated in a



double  walled  audiometric testing chamber approximately 3x3x3




m in size.  To avoid movement-induced artifacts in the CIP, he




was trained to relax during the measurement periods.  The
                               19

-------
relaxation training consisted of instructing him to perform a



continuous mental inventory of all muscles including the tongue,



ears, scalp, temples, jaw and eyes to assure that each of the



muscles was relaxed and not moving.  The subject was to allow his



head to drop forward until his chin came to rest on his chest.



     When the subject became relaxed, a pre-exposure baseline



period of CIP was recorded for 2.5 min.  Following the baseline



recording the subject was instructed to breathe the contents of a



60 1 Douglas bag which had been filled with 30 1 of either air or



one of two air/CO mixtures.  The bag breathing required 3.0 - 6.2



min  (mean - 4.2, SD » 1.1).  The subject was then removed from



the chamber and blood was drawn 2 min after the end of bag



breathing.  The subject then returned to the chamber for a post-



exposure CIP measurement.  The time from the end of bag breathing



until the beginning of post-exposure CIP measurement was 4.55 -



8.47 min (mean = 6.15, SD = 1.0).  Note that no information can



be gleaned from the present design regarding the persistence  of



the compensatory BBF response because only short term CO exposure




was used.



     The subject then exited the chamber and electrodes were



removed.  If his COHb was above 10%, he was requested to breathe



normobaric 02 for up to 1 hr until his COHb was reduced to less



than 10%.  Blood samples were drawn as appropriate to assure COHb



reduction.  After reduction of COHb to less than 10% the subject



was released with the admonition to avoid even moderate exercise




and activities which required alertness or fine motor




performance.
                              20

-------
CIP DATA REDUCTION.



     The value F of Jacquy et al. (1974) was computed on the



ensemble-averaged CIP data from the present experiment.  The



equation for F and its interpretation is given above in the



paragraph entitled "INSTRUMENTATION", "Cranial Impedance



Plethysmograph (CIP)".  One value of F was computed for each



subject and each condition in the experiment.



     Ensemble averaging was performed off-line to allow adequate



artifact rejection.  During averaging each cycle of the two-



channel CIP was displayed on a CRT screen and the operator was



then required to determine whether the displayed waves were



contaminated by artifact or distorted in a number of ways (see



below).  If no problems were found, the data were passed to the



routine for computation of the ensemble averages. Before



inclusion into the ensemble average, a straight line was fitted



between the beginning and end points of the CIP wave.  The



straight line was then subtracted from the wave to eliminate



baseline drift.  When the number of required cycles was reached,



the averaged cycles were quantified by computation of F.



     The criteria for acceptance of the displayed waves were (a)



the dicrotic notch (see Figure 1) had to be present  (b) no



truncation or clipping could be present (c) the falling portion



after the dichrotic notch had to be relatively linear and (d)



there could be only moderate baseline drift  (maximum of



approximately 30 degree baseline angle with  respect  to



horizontal).  The baseline drift was assessed by connecting an



imaginary line between the beginning and end points  of the wave.
                              21

-------
The criteria are qualitative and therefore difficult to specify



exactly.  The reliability of the selection procedure was tested



by having all records analyzed by two independent observers who



were blind to the exposure conditions.  The correlation between



their results was r = 0.95.  Thus, the procedures were



demonstrably reliable.



     For each subject and both conditions, the ensemble average



contained 50 cycles of data.  Derived measures (F) were computed



for the left and right channels and were considered to be



measures of BBF for the  left and right sides of the head.  The



final measures of vasodilation were computed as the relative



increase of F from pre-  to post-exposure for left and right



channels. The relative increase in F will be called the relative



increase in brain blood  flow, R(BBF).  This procedure avoids



absolute units of flow and is the same as that used in the



literature in dogs and sheep (Jones & Traystman, 1984) except



that the units in the literature are usually expressed as




percentages.



     Computational steps involving CIP quantification can be



summarized as follows:



        (a)  Select undistorted CIP cycles.



        (b)  Subtract TbajEkeJ.ine drift from each acceptable




             pair of CI? waves (left and right channels).




        (b)  Compute ensemble average CIP cycle for both




             channels..



        (c)  Compute F for each 50-cycle ensemble averaged




             CIP wave.
                               22

-------
        (d)  Average F across both channels to produce one



             measure per subject, per condition.  Fewer measures



             were desired to simplify the hypothesis testing.



             Individual channels were later analyzed in an



             exploratory manner.




        (e)  Compute R(BBF) from pre to post exposure.



             After hypothesis tests were made, changes were made



             in the above procedure and the data were reanalyzed



             on an exploratory basis.  The purpose of the



             reanalyses was to explore the sensitivity of the



             results to the data reduction methods.



STATISTICS.



     A straight line was fitted to R(BBF) as a function of COHb



using BMDP statistical software for microcomputers (Dixon, 1988),



program 1R.  The significance of the fit was evaluated by the F



test as computed by program Ir.  The alpha level was 0.05.



     During exploratory analyses, regression solutions were



compared for significant differences using methods from



Kleinbaum, Kupper and Muller (1988, p 266-269).  Reliability of



R(BBF) estimation methods was analyzed as a function of the



number of CIP cycles included in the ensemble averages by use of



the Spearman-Brown equation (Ghiselli, 1964).



                              RESULTS




     A total of seven statistical analyses were conducted, each



of them to test a particular hypothesis.  One of the hypotheses




was formed on an a-priori basis, the others were exploratory.



Table 1 is a list of the hypotheses and the results of their
                              23

-------
tests.  In the following text the hypothesis numbers will be used



for reference to Table 1.



R(BBF) AS A FUNCTION OF INCREASED COHb (ACOHb).



     Figure 3 is a plot of R(BBF) for each subject as a function



of that subject's ACOHb.  The line in Figure 3  is a regression



line the particulars of which are listed in Table 1, hypothesis



1A.  The fitted line accounted for a significant amount of



variance (r = 0.62, p = 0.019).



EXPLORATORY EXPERIMENTS AND ANALYSES.



     Comparison of Human and Dog Data.  To compare the human



results with those from experiments on dogs, raw data were



obtained from Richard Traystman.  Figure 4 is a plot of dog



R(BBF) as a function of ACOHb.  Exploratory regression analysis



(see Table 1, Hypothesis IE) yielded r = 0.47,  p = 0.087.  The



experimental design employed by Traystman was to use each dog as



his own control for 1 or 2 elevated COHb measures.  Consequently,



there were no independent pre-exposure baseline data as there



were for the human data.  It is probable that the non-significant



result from hypothesis  IE was due to the fact that the pre-



exposure data were not  available thus reducing the range of



ACOHb.  For exploratory purposes, it was decided to use the




fitted function given in Table 1.



     It was desired to  explore the possibility that the functions




fitted to the human data and the dog data did not differ



significantly.  Slopes  and intercepts of the dog and human data



were tested for significant differences  (Kleinbaum  et  al., 1988,




pp 266-269).  The  two intercepts were not significantly
                               24

-------
different, p > 0.5 (see Table 1, hypothesis 2E).  The two slopes
did not  differ, p > 0.1 (see Table 1, hypothesis 3E).  Thus
there was no evidence that the lines of best fit for human and
dog R(BBF) were different.  Qualitatively, the intercepts were
nearly the same.  The slopes had quite different values (0.0403
vs. 0.0135).  The lack of a significant difference in the slopes,
however, implied that there was a large uncertainty about one or
both of the estimates.
     Because the two lines cannot be said to differ, a single
function was fitted to the pooled data from the human and dog
experiments (Figure 5).  The regression analysis yielded
r = 0.69, p < 0.0001 (see Table I, hypothesis 4E).  The slope and
intercepts of the fitted function most closely approximated that
of the dog data.
     Number of CIP Cycles Required.  In the above analyses of the
human CIP, the ensemble average contained 50 CIP cycles.  From an
efficiency standpoint it would be desirable to use as few cycles
as possible.  Having to average fewer cycles would also mean that
a shorter length of raw CIP data would be needed and therefore
more temporal resolution in an ongoing record of BBF could be
obtained.  Too few cycles, however, might yield unreliable
results.
     To determine the loss of stability (reliability) as a
function of the number of cycles averaged, the entire data set
was analyzed twice, using only 10 CIP cycles in the ensemble
average (10 CIP cycles in each channel and the  results  from the
two channels averaged).  The first 10 cycles of CIP came from the
                               25

-------
early part of the 2.5 min block of data and the second 10 cycles



came from a later part.  Pre- and postexposure records were



analyzed to produce early and late estimates of F and from these



the R(BBF) was computed for both early and late parts of the



record.  Correlation between the early and late estimates of area



(the reliability coefficient) was 0.71, p < 0.007 (see Table 1,



hypothesis 5E).



     The Spearman-Brown formula (Ghiselli, 1964) was used to



estimate the  reliability for various numbers of CIP cycles in the



averaging.  Figure 6 is a plot of the estimated reliability of



the R(BBF) as a function of number of CIP cycles, from 10 to 150



cycles.  As can be seen, the reliability of the 50-cycle data as



used in the analysis of the above experiment, was estimated to be



0.92.  Fewer  CIP cycles in the average would be expected to yield



lower  reliabilities and therefore greater variance in estimates



of area across conditions or individuals.



     The intercept for the fitted line to relate the two 10-cycle



estimates of  R(BBF) was near zero (0.078).  The slope of the line



was 1.0294, (nearly unity).  It appears that the two estimates



not only correlated well but were nearly identical.



     Differences between channels.  To compare information



between left  and right channels, the R(BBF) was not averaged



across the two channels.  When data from the 50-CIP-cycle



analysis  was used, the correlation between left and right



channel R(BBF) was r = 0.90  (see Table 1, hypothesis 6E).



Apparently, there is no variation due to ACOHb in one channel



that is not found in the other.
                              26

-------
                            DISCUSSION



R(BBF) AS A FUNCTION OF ACOHb



     The R(BBF) as computed in the present study is significantly



related to ACOHb.  The correlation is approximately 0.62.



Observations about R(BBF), based upon the present results, are



potentially important.  From Figure 3, it may be seen that in the



unexposed control group, the BBF strongly tended to decline from



the baseline to the "post-exposure" measurement even though there



was no change in COHb.  This change might reflect a decreased



brain activation due  to reduced anxiety about the exposure or the



experimental procedures in general or a reduced level of stress.



No data are available from which to deduce the cause of the



decreased BBF.  The amount of BBF increase for the CO-exposed



subjects must, therefore, be compared to the predicted value for



the unexposed controls at an equivalent time in the experiment



since without COHb, they too would presumably have exhibited



vasoconstriction.  The best measure of effect is the difference



between the control and the experimental groups, not the absolute



vasodilation of the experimental group, since the latter is the



due to the contribution of the independent variable plus whatever



other variables are also acting on the control group.



     From Figure 5, it is apparent that many of the subjects



(both humans and dogs) do not appreciably increase BBF over



control values after  elevated COHb.  The regression line slope  is



significantly different from zero because most of the subjects




respond.  Apparently, some subjects do not exhibit appreciable



brain vasodilation in the presence of COHb. The variation in BBF
                              27

-------
response may be due to individual differences, or to some other



unknown factor.  Since there is high variation in BBF responses



Assumption 3 in the Introduction may not hold, i.e. there may be



variation which is related to the individual or to the occasion




of measurement.  The apparent nonresponders and (for that matter)



the apparent over responders may, of course, be entirely due to



random variation in the measurement.  No conclusion can be drawn



without further data.



IMPLICATION OF OBSERVATIONS ABOUT BBF ON BEHAVIOR



     Unpublished observations (see Introduction) imply that only



some subjects' behavior may be affected by COHb. The present



results imply that the same may hold for the BBF compensatory



response.  It seems to be a reasonable hypothesis that the



behavioral effect of COHb is inversely related to the BBF



compensatory response.  The subjects who exhibit adequate BBF



compensation for COHb may show no behavioral effects while those



subjects that do not adequately vasodilate may be behaviorally



impaired.  If the above hypothesis is valid, much of the variance



in the behavioral effects of CO exposure may be accounted for by



BBF variation.  It could also be true that there exists a



population at increased risk of behavioral impairment by COHb due



to a failure to compensate by vasodilation.  Such information



could be quite important if, indeed, the observed variation in




R(BBF) is other than random error of measurement.




HUMAN VS. DOG R(BBF)



     It appears that the measure of R(BBF) used in humans in the




present study yields data which are similar to the R(BBF) data
                              28

-------
reported by Jones and Traystman (1984) in dogs.  The slope of the



function derived from humans does not differ significantly from



that of dogs even though the numeric value of the slopes differed



markedly (human slope greater than dogs').  The numeric




difference between slopes could easily be due to the small range



of COHb values in the two studies, which could have resulted in



erroneous estimates.  The slope of the human data could have also



been over estimated because of a single subject whose R(BBF) was



2.28 for a ACOHb of only 9.8% (a possible outlier).  Conversely,



the slope of the dog data could have been erroneously estimated



because of the absence of independent baseline data thus leading



to the absence of control data at near-zero ACOHb.  When the two



data sets were combined, however, the function fitted for the



pooled data was much more similar to the dog than the human



function.  While no unique conclusion can be reached, it appears



that the slope of the human function was overestimated due to a



possible outlier.  If the variation across subjects is not due to



random error (see above) the slope of the human function may not



be important anyway, because in the face of, e.g. real individual



differences, a regression analysis would be less appropriate.



     Qualitatively, the scatter of the dog data is similar to the



scatter of the human data.  The similarity of the two data bases,



the well-understood principles of impedance plethysmography and



the standardization of CIP against other measures of BBF  (Jacquy



et al., 1974), lend credence to the use of CIP as a measure of




relative BBF.
                              29

-------
OTHER EXPLORATORY RESULTS



     There seems to be no difference between the measured



response in left and right channels of the CIP to ACOHb.  This is



due either to the lack of lateral asymmetry in the brain



circulatory system or the lack of the ability of the device to



resolve lateral differences.  From the present data base, there



is no way to decide between the above alternatives.



     The number of cycles of CIP over which averaging is carried



out is important to the reliability and stability of the



estimates of R(BBF).  Figure 6 indicates that approximately 40



cycles must be averaged to obtain a reliability coefficient of



0.90.  This figure is very useful for experimental design



purposes.  By use of Figure 6, estimates of the duration of



measurements (via number of CIP cycles to average) in a



particular condition can be made, reliabilities can be estimated



and one aspect of the power of a test can be determined.




CONCLUSIONS



(1)  The reliability of the CIP, using the methods of Jacquy et



al. (1974) to measure BBF as an analog of cranial impedance, is



high when sufficient cardiac cycles of data are included in the




ensemble average.



(2)  The BBF as measured by the CIP in man compares well




with other measures of BBF in man and with BBF measures




made by other methods in dogs.



(3)  The CIP did not show lateralization in the BBF response




to COHb.
                              30

-------
(4)  Average BBF increases with COHb in dogs,  sheep and



humans. There is, however, a large amount of variability across



individuals and/or occasion of measurement.
                               31

-------
             TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF THE HYPOTHESES TESTED WITH
                                TEST STATISTICS

                                  TEST
H*1   TEST                STAT.   df     p     r     int   slope

1A  R(BBF) - f(ACOHb)    F=7.34  1,12  0.019  0.62  0.893  0.0403
            (HUMANS)

IE  R(BBF) - F(ACOHb)    F=3.48  1,12  0.087  0.47  0.987  0.0135
            (DOGS)

2E  HUMAN AND DOG INT-   t-0.28    24  >0.50   n/a   n/a     n/a
    ERCEPTS ARE SAME

3E  HUMAN AND DOG SLOPES t=l.59    24  >0.10   n/a   n/a     n/a
    ARE SAME

4E  R(BBF) - F(ACOHb)    F=23.2  1,26  <0.001 0.69  0.985  0.0139
    MAN, DOG DATA POOLED

5E  REPEAT ANALYSIS FOR  F=10.9  1,12  0.007  0.71  0.078  1.0294
    RELIABILITY (TEST 1)

6E  DIFFERENCES BETWEEN  F=49.9  1,12  <0.001 0.90  0.246  0.7903
    LEFT/RIGHT R(BBF)


^•Hypothesis  numbered 'A' was a priori.  Those numbered 'E'  were
exploratory.
                               32

-------
                             GLOSSARY

Blind             An experimental strategy in which a participant
                  is kept uninformed about a condition.  Also see
                  "Double Blind".

Digitization      Conversion of a continuous signal of function
                  to a discrete number series.

Double blind      An experimental strategy in which neither the
                  subject nor the experimenter in contact with
                  the subject is informed of the conditions of
                  exposure.  The strategy is used to minimize
                  bias due to expectations.

Plethysmograph    An instrument used to infer changes in blood
                  flow in an intact organ of the body from
                  changes in e.g. volume, electrical impedance,
                  optical or acoustic properties of the organ.
                               33

-------
RIGHT
 CIP
LEFT
 CIP
 ECG
                         TIME
    Figure  1.   Plots of the  two-channel  CIP  and  the  ECG.   The
    left  and right CIP refer  to the  left and right sides  of  the
    head.   On  each CIP cycle,  points typical of  point A
    correspond to the opening  of the aortic  valve while poits
    typical  of point B are  the dichrotic notch,  corresponding  to
    the closing of the aortic  valve.

-------
FIRST
DERIVATIVE
OF CIP
   CIP
                         TIME
  Figure 2.  Diagram  of  the  CIP wave  and  its  first derivative,
  showing the measurements of  A,  A',  T  and  t.  These
  measurements are  used  to compute  the  derived measure, F, as
  defined by Jacquy et al. (1974).  The equation  for  F
  (without calibration coefficients)  is   F  =  (A/t(A')]/T.
                              35

-------
      2.2H
      2.M
       1.8-1
       1.'
       i.oH
       3.4-
                                           10
                                                           I
                                                          15
Figure 3.   Scatter  plot and fitted  function  for  the  values
of'R(BBF) as  a  function of ACOKb for  14  men.   The  regression
line was R(BBF)  =  0 . 0403(ACOHb) + 0.89.   r =  0.62,
p < 0-019 .
                             36

-------
    2.4—
    2.2 —
    2.0—
    1.8 —
    1.6-
    1.2 —
    1.0 —
    0.8 —
    0.6 —
    0.4
                         I
                         20
 I
40
                                                        50
                            COHb (?)
Figure 4.   Scatter plot and  fitted  function for the values
of R(BBF)  as  a  function of ACOHb  for  14 dogs.  The
regression  line was R(BBF) =  0.0135(ACOHb)  + 0.99.
r = 0.47,  p <  0.087 .
                             37

-------
     2.4—
     2.2-
     2.0-
     1.8-
     1.6-
     1.2-
     1.0 —
     0.3-1
     0.6 —
     0.4
                          20
 I
40
 I
60
                             COHb
Figure 5.   Scatter  plot and fitted function  for  the  values
of R(BBF) as  a  function of ACOHb for  the pooled  data of 14
men and 14  dogs.   Open circles are dog data,  filled  circles
are human data.   The regression line  was
R(BBF) = 0.0139(ACOHb) + 0.99.  r = 0.69, p  <  0.0001.
                             38

-------
                         LITERATURE CITED

Albrecht,  R.F.,  Miletich, D.J., and Ruttle, M.  1987.  Cerebral
effects of extended hyperventilation in unanesthetized goats.
Stroke. 18:649-655.

Benignus, V.A., Muller, K.E., and Malott, C.M.  1989. Dose-
effects functions for carboxyhemoglobin and behavior. Neurotox. &
Teratol.  In Press, 1990.

Colditz,  P.,  Greisen, G., and Pryds, 0.  1988.  Comparison of
electrical impedance and 133-xenon clearance for the assessment
of cerebral blood flow in the newborn infant.  Pediat. Res.
24:461-464.

Dixon, W.J. (ed.) 1988.  BMDP Statistical Software Manual.
University of California Press, Berkely.

Ghiselli,   E.E.  1964.  Theory of Psychological Measurement.
McGraw-Hill, New York.

Hadjiev,  D. 1968.  A new method for quantitative  evaluation  of
cerebral  blood flow by rheoencephalography.  Brain Res.  8:213-
215.

Hanley,  D.F.,  Wilson, D.A., Traystman, R.J.  1986.  Effect  of
hypoxia and hypercapnia on neurohypophyseal blood flow.  Am.  J.
Physiol. 250: H77-H15.

Horvath, S.M. 5/1989.  Private communication, Durham, NC.

Jacquy, J., Dekoninck, W.J., Piraux, A., Calay, R., Bacq,  J.,
Levy, D., and Noel, G.  1974.  Cerebral blood flow and
quantitative rheoencephalography.  Electroenceph. and Clin.
Neurophysiol. 36:507-511.

Jenkner, F.L.  1962.  Rheoencephalography - A Method for the
Continuous Registration of Cerebrovascular Changes.  Charles C.
Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1962.

Jevning, R., Fernando, G., and Wilson, A.F. 1989. Evaluation  of
consistency among different electrical impedance indices of
relative cerebral blood flow in normal resting individuals.  J of
Biomed. Eng. 1153-56.

Jones, M.D. Jr., and Traystman, R.J. 1984.  Cerebral oxygenation
of the fetus, newborn, and adult.  Semin. Perinatol. 8:205-216.

Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., and Muller, K.E.  1988. Applied
Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods.  PWS-Kent
Publishing Company, Boston.
                              39

-------
Koehler, R.C., Traystman, R.J., Zeger, S., Rogers, M.C., and
Jones, M.D.  1984.  Comparison of cerebrovascular responses to
hypoxic and carbon monoxide hypoxia in newborn and adult sheep.
J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 4:115-122.

Krasney, J.A., McDonald, B.W., and Matalon, S.  1984.  Regional
circulatory responses to 96 hours of hypoxia in conscious sheep.
Respir. Physiol. 57:73-88.

Lambertsen, C.J. 1980.  Effects of excessive pressures of oxygen,
nitrogen, helium, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide.   In V-
Mountcastle (Ed.), Medical Physiology, vol. 2, pp. 1901-1944. St.
Louis: C.V. Mosby Company.

Manohar, M. , Parks, C.M., Busch, and Bisgard, G.E.  1984.  Bovine
regional brain blood flow during sojourn at a simulated altitude
of 3500 m. Respir. Physiol. 58:111-122.

Okeda, R., Matsuo, T.,  Kuroiwa, T., Nakai, M., Tajima, T., and
Takahashi, H. 1987.  Regional  cerebral blood flow of acute carbon
monoxide poisoning in cats.    Acta Neuropathol. 72:389-393.

Piantadosi, C.A., Sylvia, A.L. and Jobsis-Vandervliet, F.F. 1987.
Differences in brain cytochrome responses to carbon monoxide  and
cyanide in vivo.  J. Appl. Physiol. 62:1277-1284.

Raichle, M.E., Posner,  J.B., and Plum, F.  1970.  Cerebral blood
flow during and after hyperventilation.   Arch.  Neurol. 23:394-
403.

Wilson, D.A., Manley, D.F., Feldman, M.A., Traystman, R.J.  1987.
Influence of chemoreceptors on neurohypophyseal blood flow during
hypoxic hypoxia.  Circ. Res. 61:1194-11101.
                               40

-------
               APPENDIX
     TECHNICAL  DESCRIPTION OF THE




CRANIAL IMPEDANCE  PLETHYSMOGRAPH (CIP!




              INSTRUMENT
                 41

-------
                             APPENDIX

               TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CRANIAL
             IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPH (CIP) INSTRUMENT
INTRODUCTION
     Noninvasive measurement of cerebral blood flow can be

accomplished by a variety of medical instrumentation,  i.e.

nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), radio labeled isotopes in the

blood, and doppler backscatter of red blood cells exposed to

ultrasonic signals.  Each method has its advantages,

disadvantages, cost effectiveness and the type of information

obtained.  Each method is unique and may be favored over other

methods depending on the desired application.   i.e.,  clinical

diagnostic, research, mobility, and various environmental

exposure situations.

     Of the popular methods, (NMR) requires large size buildings

and computer controlled data acquisition systems.  Other systems

include mobile carts which are far too costly and not  suitable

for laboratory experiments or field applications.  Alternative

noninvasive measurements of cerebral blood circulation have been

considered which are more cost effective and physically portable.

For the latter, the level of measurement accuracy and  validation

is not equivalent to the more sophisticated and costly methods.

     For the purposes of behavioral experiments involving carbon

monoxide exposures with (COHb levels of 10-20%), the impedance

plethysmographic method was selected for measurement of cerebral

pulsatile blood volume-  This method is also known as

rheoencephalography (Jenkner,  1962).  Commercially available

instruments, however, were found to be inadequate for  one or more
                              42

-------
of the following reasons:  (a) poor sensitivity to cerebral



vessel vasomotor events, (b) poor signal to noise ratio, (c)



D.C.  drift problems, (d) excessive artifact, (e) excessive



size, (f) poor electrical safety characteristics, and (g) poor



calibration and data display methods.




     In order to overcome the above limitations, a dedicated two



channel cranial impedance plethysmograph (CIP)  instrument was



designed, and fabricated.  The CIP, as a result of its basic



design, measures the change of electrical impedance (z)  of



pulsatile red cell masses as they pass between specific



excitation (current source electrodes) and detection electrodes



(Jenkner, 1962).  Briefly, the measurement of z-changes  between



electrodes represent changes of electrical conductivity  in a 100



KHz electrical field.  This measurement, therefore, is not a



direct measure of any fluid flow component such as blood.



Conversely, the measured signal amplitude is generally



proportional to the fluid bolus profile.




SYSTEM DESCRIPTION



     The CIP system used in the present study is comprised of



(1) a two channel impedance plethysmograph instrument,  (2) a two



channel electrode system, (3) an auxiliary ECG channel and (4) a



power source-  The CIP electrodes are placed in proximity to the



area of observation (cerebral vascular tree).  One pick-up




electrode ( + ) channel (1) is placed over the right eyebrow.  A




second pick-up electrode (+) channel  (2) is placed over  the left



eyebrow.  Each CIP channel is referenced (-) to each mastoid




process.  A 100 KHz, 4 ma square-wave excitation signal  from a
                              43

-------
constant-current source is applied, to the center of the



forehead.  The excitation current source is referenced to a



common electrode on the inion (back of the skull).



     This electrode configuration creates a 100 KHz square-wave



field within the frontal to occipital skull region.  As pulsatile



blood flow occurs, the 100 KHz signal is modulated and picked-up



by the (+) recording electrodes.  The modulated signal is




subsequently processed to its analog slow-wave component.



As cerebral vascular modulation takes place, this change of



impedance is amplified and sent to a synchronous detector



circuit.  The synchronous detector removes the 100 KHz (carrier)



signal but retains its slow-wave envelope as an analog signal.



The analog signal reflects the pulsatile blood volume profile



including the opening of the aortic valve and the dicrotic notch



or closing of the aortic valve (see Figure 1).



     The analog signal is fed to a delta z rebalancing circuit



which has a maximum D.C. limit in the event of artifact, i.e., if



a lead movement, scalp flexing signal exceeded the delta z



threshold, the circuit is automatically re-zeroed.  This prevents



overdriving or saturation of any recording device or analog to



digital converters connected to the CIP output.  Each of two CIP




channels are virtually identical.



IMPEDANCE DISPLAYS AND OUTPUT CONNECTORS



     Each channel contains its own LCD display for calibration



and subject impedance measurements.  Each channel has the




following analog signal outputs:
                              44

-------
              1.    Zo  =  base  impedance



              2.    Z = subject  impedance



              3.    dz/dt =  1st  derivative  impedance



              4.    ECG = electrocardiogram



     The detected  (Zo)  signal  is  also  sent  to a D.C.  16 Hz  low



pass filter  and  to an isolation amplifier.  Additionally, the



output of  the  rebalancing  (z)  signal is fed to an isolation



amplifier. When  velocity of  flow  profile  information  is desired,



the  (z) is fed to  a differentiator amplifier and then to an



isolation  amplifier,  resulting in a dz/dt signal.



     In addition to the impedance signals, a three lead ECG



signal is  provided to check  for cardiac rhythm synchronization



with CIP signals.  The  output  connectors  provide signal levels of



+1.5 volt  for use  with  an  analog  recorder, or an analog to



digital converter.



SUBJECT ELECTRICAL SAFETY




     All bioimpedance signals  and the  ECG signal are fed to



output connectors  via isolation amplifiers.  The isolation



amplifier provides low  leakage currents and reduce possible shock



hazards when the CIP  is  connected to the  test subject or other



instruments.



FRONT PANEL CONTROLS




A.  Power  Switch  - This switch turns  the instrument off and



    on.  When power is  on  the  red POWER light is lit.
                              45

-------
B.  ZO  Meter - This meter indicates what has traditionally been



    called the "base" impedance or the "static" impedance of the



    CIP signal.  The meter reads 0 to 70 ohms +1% of reading +0.1



    ohm.



C.  Operate-Calibrate Switch - This is a momentary-contact,



    center-off switch which selects the operating mode of the



    instrument.  Momentarily pushing the switch in the Operate



    direction connects the instrument to the front panel input



    connectors during which the calibrate light is not lit.



    Momentarily pushing the switch in the calibrate direction



    connects the instrument to the internal calibrator signals



    during which the calibrate light is lit.



D.  Rebalance Switch - This switch has three positions AUTO, OFF,



    and ZERO.



    1. AUTO - In this position the instrument automatically



       rebalances  (re-zeros) the delta Z channel whenever the



       threshold which has been set on the front panel



       dial is exceeded.  When rebalancing occurs, the rebalance



       light on the front panel flashes and a 10 ms TTL pulse



       appears at  the rebalance output connector on the rear



       panel.



    2. OFF - This  position sets the rebalance threshold to



       +12V (+3 ohm). Under normal signal conditions



       this effectively inhibits all rebalancing. (NOTE: Re-



       balancing may still occur if the input is open circuited



       and the delta Z channel saturates with noise.)
                              46

-------
    3. ZERO (Momentary) - This position forces a rebalance to



       occur by momentarily setting the rebalance threshold to



       0 volts.




E.  Rebalance Threshold Control - This ten-turn, continuaous dial



    indicates the relative rebalance threshold on a scale of 0 to



    10.  This corresponds to an impedance range of 50 milliohms



    (0) to 0.5 ohm (10.)




F.  Z Input Connector - 9 pin input connector for the subject



    impedance leads.



G.  ECG Input Connector - 5 pin input connector for the subject



    ECG leads.



REAR PANEL CONNECTIONS:



    ECG Output - BNC



    dZ/dt Output (CHI & CH2) - BNC



    delta Z Output (CHl & CH2) - BNC



    ZO Output (CHl & CH2) - BNC



    Rebalance Pulse Output (CHl & CH2) - BNC



INITIAL SETUP



A. Connect the instrument to a standard 3-wire 120 VAC power




   source



B. Turn the instrument on via the front panel power switch.  The




   red POWER light should light.



C. Switch both channels (1&2) to the calibrate mode by



   momentarily pushing each operate-calibrate switch to the




   calibrate position. Both red calibrate lights should light.
                              47

-------
D. Rebalance both channels (1&2) by momentarily depressing each



   rebalance switch to zero position.  If a rebalance operation



   occurs the green rebalance light should flash.



E. Display the calibration signals.  They  should be as follows:



            ECG             - 2.0Vp-p Triangle Wave



            dz/dt           - 4.0VO-0 Square Wave



            delta Z         - 680mVp-p Triangle Wave



            ZO              - 0.0 volts



            Rebalance Pulse - 0.0 volts except during rebalance



                              when each rebalance will generate



                              a 5V, 10 ms pulse.



F. Front Panel Meters - With the instrument in calibrate mode



   both meters should indicate 35 ohm (+0.45 ohm).



OPERATION



A.  Attach the CIP electrodes to the subject and connect them to



    the Channel 1 input cable.  The connections to this cable are



    numbered as follows:



             1  Current source



             2  + Impedance Pickup



             3  - Impedance Pickup



             4  Current Return (common)



    Connect the Channel 1 cable to the front panel of the



    instrument. NOTE: If only one impedance channel is being used



    it must be channel 1 because only channel 1 is connected to



    the current source.
                              48

-------
B-  If two impedance channels are being used, attach  the  second



    set of CIP electrodes to the subject and connect  them to  the



    Channel 2 input cable.  The connections to this cable  are



    numbered:



             1  OPEN




             2  + Impedance Pickup




             3  - Impedance Pickup



             4  - OPEN




    Connect the Channel 2 cable to the front panel of the



    instrument.  NOTE: Channel 2 does not contain a current



    source.  It must be used in conjunction with the Channel 1



    current source to make a measurement.  Similarly,  if Channel



    1 is switched into the calibrate mode the current source is



    removed from the subject and Channel 2 will not record a



    signal even though it remains in the operate mode.



C.  Attach the ECG electrodes to the subject and connect them to



    the input cable.  Connect the ECG cable to the front panel of



    the instrument.



D.  Switch the impedance channels being used from the  Calibrate



    to the Operate mode.  Again, if a single channel is being



    used it must be Channel 1.  Momentarily depress each



    rebalance switch to the Zero position then set them to the



    AUTO position.  Set the rebalance threshold dial to 10.  It



    is best to leave the threshold set on 10 as this allows the




    largest delta Z signal possible without saturating the dz/dt




    ci rcuits.
                              49

-------
    Connect an oscilloscope or strip chart recorder to the



    outputs and observe subject waveforms.




                          SPECIFICATIONS



      CURRENT SOURCE



        Frequency



        Output level
        Effective output impedance



        Dynamic range



        Maximum open circuit output



        voltage



II.    Zo Channel



        Output sensitivity








        Bandwidth (-3dB)



        Dynamic range



        Noise



        Output Impedance



III.   delta Z Channel



        Output sensitivity



        Bandwidth (-3dB)



        Dynamic range




        Noise



        Output Impedance
100 kHz, sinusoidal



4 mA rms



50 kohm



0 ohm to 2 kohm



+ 12V
200 mV/ohm



0 ohm = -7.0 V



DC to 0.16 Hz



0 ohm to 70 ohm



2mVp-p



50 ohm








8 V/ohm



DC to 100 Hz



+3 ohms (Rebalance off



4mVp-p



50 ohm
                              50

-------
 IV.    dz/dt  Channel



        Output sensitivity             2 V/(ohm/sec)



        Bandwidth  (-3dB)               2 Hz to 40 Hz




        Dynamic range                  +Vp-p 0-40Hz  (2.5 mohm/




                                       sec equivalent)



        Output Impedance               50 ohm



V.    ECG Channel




        Output sensitivity             1000 V/V



        Bandwidth  (-3dB)               0.07 Hz to 106 Hz



        Dynamic range                  +12 mv input



        Noise                          4mVp-p output



        Output Impedance               50 ohm



VI.   Front  Panel Meter



        Range                          0 to 70 ohms



        Accuracy                       + 1% of reading +0.1  ohm



VII.  Front  Panel Threshold Potentiometer



      Range    Indicator    Threshold Voltage    Effective  ohms



                   0              0.2 V          +50 milliohms



                  10              2.2 V          +550 milliohms



VIII. Rear Panel Rebalance Pulse



        TTL  compatible                 (0 to 5 V)



        Pulse width                    10 msec
                              51

-------
IX.    Internal Circuits



      Synchronous Demodulator - recovers only resistive (in-



      phase)  component



      Digital Rebalance



        Droop rate                     0 V/sec



        Resolution                     16 bits (1 LSB = 763 uohm)



        Dynamic range                  0 to 10 V (0-50 ohm)



      (Zo suppression resolution to within +6 mV at delta Z



      output [+0.75 milliohms])



X.    Isolation



        Maximum leakage current, total instrument    14uA



        Maximum lead leakage current to ground        6uA



        Maximum isolated lead leakage current to



        ground (120 VAC applied between lead



        and AC power ground)                         23uA
                               52

-------
                         DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. of Copies

15              Commander
                U.S. Army Biomedical Research and
                Development Laboratory
                Attn:  SGRD-UBZ-RA
                Ft. Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701-5010

1              Commander
               U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
               Attn:  SGRD-RMI-S
               Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701-5012

2              Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
               Attn:  DTIC-FDAC
               Cameron Station
               Alexandria, VA 22304-6145

1              Dean
               School of Medicine
               Uniformed Services University of the
               Health Sciences
               4301 Jones Bridge Road
               Bethesda, MD 20014

1              Commander
               U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency
               Attn:  HSHB-0
               Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD 21010

1              Commander
               U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency
               Attn:  Librarian,  HSHD-AD-L
               Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010

1              Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
               Department of Respiratory Research
               Attn:  SGRD-UWH-E
               Washington, D.C. 10307-5100

2              U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental
               Medicine
               Attn:  SGRD-UE-MEP
               Natick, MA  01760-5007

1              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Human Studies Division
               Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

1              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Library
               Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                               53

-------
Commandant
Academy of Health Sciences, U.S. Army
Attn: HSHA-CDB
Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6100
               54

-------