OUIDE
                   CONTROL
                   POLLUTION
                       In
                    Small
                    Urban
J. >. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
     GUIDE FOR  CONTROL
OF AIR POLLUTION EPISODES
   IN SMALL URBAN AREAS
         Prepared under Public Health Service
            Contract No. PH-22-68-32
      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            Office of Air Programs
        Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
                June 1971
  For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
          Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents
              Stock Number 5503-0012

-------
The  AP series of reports is issued by  the  Office of Air Programs.
Environmental Protection Agency, to report the results of scientific and
engineering  studies, and  information of general interest  in the field of
air pollution.  Information reported in this series includes coverage of
Air Program intramural activities and of cooperative studies conducted
in conjunction  with  state and local agencies, research institutes, and
industrial organizations.  Copies of AP  reports are available free of
charge to Federal employees, current contractors  and grantees,  and
nonprofit organizations    as  supplies permit - from the Office of Tech-
nical  Information and Publications. Office  of Air  Programs.  Environ -
mental Protection Agency. P. O. Box  12055. Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina  27709.  Other requestors may purchase copies from the
Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C.  20402.
        Office of Air Programs Publication No. AP-78

-------
                        CONTENTS

Section                                                    Page

LIST OF FIGURES    	      v
LIST OF TABLES  	   v
1.  INTRODUCTION 	   1
   1.1 OBJECTIVE  	   1
   1.2 SCOPE	   1
   1.3 EPISODE BACKGROUND  	   2

2.  DEFINITIONS OF EPISODE FACTORS	   5
   2.1 ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS-THEIR NATURE AND
      EFFECTS 	   5
      2.1.1 Participates	   5
      2.1.2 Sulfur Oxides  	   6
      2.1.3 Carbon Monoxide 	   7
      2.1.4 Oxidants  	   8
      2.1.5 Oxides of Nitrogen  	   9
      2.1.6 Other Pollutants	  10
   2.2 METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS  RELATED TO AIR POLLU-
      TION EPISODES	  10
      2.2.1 Local Considerations  	  10
      2.2.2 Atmospheric Indicators of Episode Development	  13

3.  EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN	  17
   3.1 INTRODUCTION  	  17
   3.2 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FORMULATION  	  18
      3.2.1 Responsibility and Authority	  18
      3.2.2 Emergency Action Criteria   	  19
      3.2.3 Background Information	  19
      3.2.4 Emergency Source-Curtailment Action  	  19
      3.2.5 Communications	  20
      3.2.6 Reporting	  20
   3.3 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION	  20
      3.3.1 Emission Source Inventory  	  21
      3.3.2 Air Quality Observations  	  23
      3.3.3 Atmospheric Dispersion Estimation	  24
      3.3.4 Communications	  25
      3.3.5 Socio-Economic Factors	  26
      3.3.6 Emergency Action Plan Criteria 	  30
      3.3.7 Emission Curtailment	  31
                              111

-------
                                                  Page

4. SUMMARY  	   33

5. REFERENCES	   35

APPENDICES
  A. GLOSSARY OF AIR POLLUTION TERMS  	   37
  B. AIR QUALITY CRITERIA	   45
  C. fflGH AIR POLLUTION POTENTIAL ADVISORY PROGRAM .   51
  D. TAPE SAMPLER	   53
  E. NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE STATIONS IN UNITED
     STATES	      	   57
  F. EXAMPLE PROBLEMS IN DIFFUSION ESTIMATION	   59
                        IV

-------
                     LIST OF FIGURES

Figure                                                           Page

 1-1 Frequency of Air Pollution Episodes	    3

 2-1 Atmospheric Areas of Continental U.S	   11

 2-2 Schematic  Representation of  Effect  of  Vertical  Temperature
    Gradient on Atmospheric Mixing	   15

 3-1 Elements of Emergency Action Plan  	   18

 3-2 Sample Press Release	   27

 3-3 Flyer  Published by the  National Tuberculosis  and Respiratory
    Disease Association	   29

 E-l National Weather Service Stations in United States	   58
                      LIST OF TABLES


Table                                                            Page

B-l Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter	   46

B-2 Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur Oxides  	   47

B-3 Air Quality Criteria for Carbon Monoxide	   48

B-4 Air Quality Criteria for Ozone Based on Health Effects  	   49

B-5 Air Quality Criteria for Oxidants Based on Health Effects  	   50

-------
            GUIDE  FOR CONTROL

     OF AIR  POLLUTION  EPISODES

          IN SMALL URBAN AREAS



                   1.  INTRODUCTION


 1.1  OBJECTIVE

   This manual has  been made available  through the efforts of the Air
Pollution Control Office's (APCO's) Emergency Operations Control Center and
is intended to assist local  air pollution control officials concerned with the
design and implementation of emergency action plans for the avoidance of air
pollution episodes. In  this document, an air pollution episode is defined briefly
as  the occurrence of  stagnant  air masses  during which air pollutants
accumulate, so that the population is exposed to an elevated concentration of
airborne contaminants. It  is  not specifically designed for utilization in the
"man-made" type incident in which an accident or spill results in a localized
fumigation of emergency proportions. Much of the direction provided herein,
however, will be applicable to such a situation.


1.2  SCOPE
   The manual is directed toward the needs of relatively small cities. A city
with a nominal population of 10,000 to 30,000 cannot be expected to have a
highly sophisticated air pollution control authority and often must rely on the
State agency for overall guidance. Limited but effective control actions can be
taken  in any area, however; it is not essential that sophisticated air quality
monitoring  capabilities  and  other  specialized  technical  expertise  be
immediately available.  In spite of limited technological  capabilities, local
agencies may be able to take effective action owing to their great familiarity
with their jurisdiction. This manual is then restricted to some of the more basic
procedures  and  should be a  valuable reference for those local air  pollution
control authorities with limited resources at their disposal.

-------
 1.3 EPISODE BACKGROUND

    The occurrences of air pollution episodes are becoming more frequent with
 the growth of our society.  Reported  critical periods of air pollution date back
 as  far as  1873.  London  has had ten reported episodes since that date; New
 York City has had seven reported episodes since 1953. At least two of the
 latter were general episodes for the  entire Eastern United States. Other well-
 known episodes occurred  in  the Meuse Valley of Belgium and in Donora,
 Pennsylvania. Minor "incidents" have been reported for St. Louis, Missouri;
 Cincinnati, Ohio;  Wierton, West Virginia; Rotterdam,  Holland;  Hamburg,
 Germany; and Osaka, Japan. Critical periods of smog have occurred frequently
 in  Los  Angeles, California; and outbreaks  of asthma  have  been reported for
 New Orleans, Louisiana, and for the Tokyo-Yokohama  area of Japan.

    Many incidents of air pollution episodes are borderline cases, and they may
 go unreported.  An episode may occur for a short period of time but not be
 reported  in  the technical  literature  because the number of people  severely
 affected is not  large enough to attract public attention. The 1953 episode in
 New York was not reported until 9 years later.

    Some general indicators of air pollution episodes that can be derived from
 the reported literature are:

     1. Prolonged anticyclonic weather systems were present.

     2. Temperature inversions were  noted.
     3. Wind speeds were low.

     4. Concentrations  of smoke,  sulfur dioxide, and  other pollutants in-
        creased to critical levels.

     5. Mortality  associated   with  peak  concentrations  of air pollutants
        increased.

     6. Morbidity was also related to the air pollution levels  encountered.
     7. The effects were prompt.

     8. Death and illness occurred in all age groups.

     9. Excessive death rate occurred with increasing age.

    10. Effects  of  episodes on health  seemed to be due to a combination of
        several pollutants.

    11. Deaths generally resulted from the breakdown  of human respiratory or
        cardiovascular systems.

    12.  Cough and eye irritation were shown to be related to episode pollution
        levels.

    13.  The duration of episodes generally ranged from  2 to 7 days.



2                           GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
    14. Species other than man may have succumbed  to  the  air pollution
        dosages received.


    Detailed  documentation is not available on most reported  air pollution
 episodes,  especially those occurring before 1957.  Lynn,  Steigerwald,  and
 Ludwig have described  in some detail the November-December  1962  air
 pollution   episode  in the Eastern  United States.1  During  this  episode,
 benzene-soluble organics rose to 7 times their normal, and total particles rose
 to approximately 4 times their normal. Carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and
 sulfur dioxide were also elevated 3 to 6 times their normal.
    Fensterstock and Fankhauser have reported on the Thanksgiving 1966 air
pollution episode  in the Eastern United  States.2 Peak pollution levels were
recorded during this episode, and the death rate increased by approximately 24
deaths per day.
    Awareness of air pollution is growing, and techniques for monitoring levels
of pollution  are improving. Episode frequency is increasing, as demonstrated
by Figure 1-1, which shows the frequency of air pollution episodes as reported
in the literature.
    High Air  Pollution Potential  Advisories (HAPPA), issued daily by the
National Weather  Service, were initiated on a regular basis in August  1960.
Advance warnings  of meteorological conditions conducive to the accumulation
o
>. 5

•1
2 4
i
>-" 3
u
Ul
§ 2
Ul

" 1
n
111111 ' ' f( AIR POLLUTION
l< POTENTIAL
1 1 FORECASTS
1
—» 1
1
1.
1

1
1
ii ii 	 mi;
—

_


—











         1870
                               YEAR
L
            Figure 1-1.  Frequency of air pollution episodes.
Introduction

-------
of air pollution are  provided by this system. To provide the service, a set of
semi-arbitrary technical  conditions has been selected  for  defining high  air
pollution  potential.  These advisories, plus their possible utilization,  will be
discussed later in this guide.


    In  general  terms,  a  description of weather conditions conducive to  air
pollution episodes is as follows:

    1. A high-pressure system becomes almost stationary  over the area for
      several days.
    2. No precipitation occurs.

    3. Temperatures are  generally above normal.

    4. Winds range  between 0 and 7 miles per hour near the surface, and are
      relatively light aloft to at least 18,000 feet (500 millibars).

    5. Air at higher elevations is slowly sinking and warming (subsidence).

    6. Air in the low levels is stable, that is, it exhibits little motion or mixing
      in the vertical layers.

    7. Temperature  in these layers increases with height (inversion) instead of
      decreasing as is normal.

    From a meteorological standpoint, a weather situation conducive to the
accumulation of high concentrations of air  pollutants is said  to have "high
pollution  potential," whether pollutant sources actually exist in  the underlying
air or not.
                            GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
      2.   DEFINITIONS  OF EPISODE  FACTORS
    High concentratons of man-made pollutants in the air have produced the
 following observed effects:

    1.  Reduction of visibility.

    2.  Deterioration of fabrics, metals, and building materials.
    3.  Damage to vegetation and animals.

    4.  Injury to man.

    If, under chronic conditions, the pollutant levels are sufficient to produce
 some of these manifestations, then, under acute  (episode) conditions, these
 effects can interact to create an emergency or, perhaps, a disaster. When the
 population is subjected to these extreme pollution levels, public concern and
 cooperation are at a maximum. Compulsory and voluntary emission reduction
 is most easily justified and  obtained, provided proper direction is available
 from the local authority.  Thus, this section deals with information that should
 help the local authority to understand and define the factors that constitute an
 air pollution episode. A glossary of air pollution terminology can be found in
 Appendix A.
2.1  ATMOSPHERIC POLLUXANTS-
     THEIR NATURE AND EFFECTS


2.1.1  Participates

   Particles of solid—and occasionally liquid—matter in  the air constitute a
relatively small but important portion of polluted community air in most cities
and towns  in the United States.  These so-called particulates may be either so
large that they rapidly settle to the  ground, or  so small that they remain
suspended in the air until they are removed by such natural phenomena as rain
or until they are inhaled by people. Particulates may be quite complex in their
chemical composition. The organic materials found in airborne particles may

-------
 contain aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, acids, bases, phenols, and other
 compounds. Airborne  particles  may also contain any  of a wide  range of
 metallic elements; those most commonly found are silicon, calcium, aluminum,
 iron,  magnesium,  lead, copper,  zinc, sodium, and  manganese. Sources of
 particulates include such activities as fuel combustion, various manufacturing
 and  processing  operations  (production  of steel, cement,  and petroleum
 products), and open burning and incineration of refuse.

    Particulate air  pollution is widely regarded as objectionable  because  it is
 often aesthetically bothersome. It interferes with visibility and  is associated
 with soiling and corrosion of metals, fabrics, and other  materials. Its adverse
 effects on health are far more subtle but, nonetheless, significant. In general,
 concern about the health effects of particulates is related to (1) the ability of
 the human respiratory system to remove particulates from  inhaled air  and
 retain them in the lung, (2) the presence in some  particulates of mineral
 substances  having  toxic  or  other physiological effects,  (3) the presence in
 particulates  of polycyclic hydrocarbons having  demonstrated  carcinogenic
 (cancer-producing)  properties,  (4)  the  demonstrated ability of some  fine
 particles  to increase the harmful physiological activity of irritant gases when
 both  are  simultaneously present in inhaled  air,  and  (5) the  ability of some
 mineral   particulates to  increase  the rate  at  which sulfur  dioxide  in  the
 atmosphere is converted by  oxidation to the far more physiologically active
 sulfur trioxide.

    The size of airborne particles has an important bearing on whether and to
 what  extent  they  will reach the lungs. Most coarse  particles—those about 5
 microns or more in diameter—lodge  in the nasal passages. Smaller particles are
 more likely to penetrate into the lungs; the rate of penetration increases with
 decreasing particle size. Particles smaller than 2 to 3 microns usually reach the
 deeper structures of the lungs where there is no protective mucous blanket.

    The ability of particles  to  accentuate the adverse physiological effects of
 simultaneously inhaled gas is one of the most important  aspects of the health
 hazard of particulate air pollution.  Combinations of gases and particles have
 been  shown to cause toxicity changes in rodents, resistance to airflow in  the
 respiratory tract, and bactericidal action.

    Air quality criteria  for particulate matter can be found in Appendix B.


 2.1.2 Sulfur Oxides

    The sulfur oxides (SOX) that are of concern as atmospheric pollutants are
 sulfur dioxide, sulfur trioxide, and their acids and acid  salts. Fossil fuels such as
 coal and petroleum contain elemental sulfur; when the fuel burns, the sulfur is
 converted to  sulfur dioxide and, to a lesser  degree, sulfur trioxide. Because
 fossil fuels are burned extensively in the United States to heat buildings and to
 generate electric power, pollution  of the atmosphere  with  SOX is widespread


6                            GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
and is  especially prevalent in cities.  Petroleum refineries, smelting plants,
coke-processing plants, sulfuric acid manufacturing plants, coal-refuse banks,
and refuse-burning activities are also major sources of sulfurous pollution.

    The evidence  is  considerable  that  SOX  pollution  aggravates  existing
respiratory  diseases in humans and contributes to their development. Sulfur
dioxide alone  irritates the upper respiratory tract; adsorbed on particulate
matter, the gas can be carried deep into the respiratory  tract to injure lung
tissue.  Sulfuric acid, when inhaled in  a  certain particle size, can also deeply
penetrate the lungs and damage tissue.

    The documented severe air pollution episodes had common factors: they
occurred  in heavily industrialized areas during  relatively  brief  periods  of
anticyclonic weather conditions; sulfur dioxide levels were excessively high, as
were levels  of other gaseous and particulate pollution. Although the pattern of
effects  was not perfectly  uniform in all  these episodes, generally the elderly,
the very young, and those with pre-existing cardiorespiratory disease were most
affected.

    Epidemiological and clinical studies substantiate the evidence that certain
portions of the population are more sensitive than others to SOX pollution. For
example, prolonged exposures to relatively  low levels  of sulfur dioxide have
been  associated with increased  cardiovascular morbidity in older persons;
prolonged exposures to higher concentrations of  sulfur  dioxide have been
associated with an increase in respiratory disease death rates and an increase in
complaints  of nonproductive cough, mucous membrane irritation, and mucous
secretion by school children; the residual air in the lungs of emphysematous
patients has been reduced significantly  when the patients breathed ambient air
that had been filtered of pollutants.

    Sulfur oxides pollution can also adversely affect the more robust segments
of  the  population. Experiments in which healthy human volunteers were
exposed to sulfur dioxide  concentrations several  times higher than the taste
threshold concentration indicate that such exposures will produce pulmonary
function changes including increased respiration  rates, decreased  respiratory
flow rates,  and increased  airway  resistance. The impairment of function was
greater  when the sulfur  dioxide  was  administered together with particulate
matter.

    Air  quality  criteria for SOX can be found in Appendix B.
2.1.3  Carbon Monoxide

    Carbon  monoxide  (CO)  is one of the most common of all  urban air
pollutants  and  one  of the most  harmful to man. Its ability to impede the
oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood makes it lethal in high concentrations.
Though all  processes involving combustion of carbonaceous material produce
Definitions of Episode Factors

-------
 CO  the motor vehicle is by  far the most important source from which this
 pollutant gas reaches the atmosphere. The wide use of motor vehicles, coupled
 with the fact that they discharge pollutants from points close to the gound,
 makes them the  prime contributor to most people's daily exposure to CO.
 Federal standards to  control carbon  monoxide  emissions from  new motor
 vehicles have been established and became effective beginning with  1968 model
 cars and light trucks.

    Carbon  monoxide  poisoning is a  well-understood phenomenon. As with
 many other harmful gases, the degree of damage that man sustains as a result of
 exposure to CO is related to the concentration of the gas in inhaled air and the
 length of exposure. The hazards of CO arise mainly from its strong affinity for
 hemoglobin, which carries oxygen to body tissues. The effect of CO combining
 with hemoglobin  is to  deprive the tissues of needed oxygen. At concentrations
 of slightly more  than  1,000  parts per million (ppm), CO  kills quickly.  Fifty
 parts per million  is now recommended as the upper limit of safety for healthy
 industrial workers exposed for  an 8-hour period. At approximately 100  ppm,
 most people experience dizziness, headache, lassitude, and other symptoms.

    In the January 1956 smog episode, CO concentrations in  the ambient air
 reached 50  ppm  in London and  80 ppm  in  Salford, England. Inside
 automobiles,  concentrations  were  undoubtedly considerably higher.  For
 comparison, the average CO level in London during 1955 was 15  ppm.

    It is quite possible that during episodes, the levels of CO that are reached
 both in vehicles and close to the highways are frequently high enough to affect
 some especially  susceptible persons,  such  as those  already suffering from a
 disease associated with a decrease  of oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood
 (e.g., anemia) or those suffering  from cardiorespiratory  disease. The  extra
 burden that is placed  on the body by  the reduction of the oxygen-carrying
 capacity of the blood  induced by CO may cause injury  to vital organs. People
 already burdened by the  presence in their blood of unusual  amounts of CO
 because of tobacco smoking or occupational exposure  may also be adversely
 affected by the extra amount of CO they inhale from contaminated air.

    Air quality criteria for CO can be found in Appendix B.
2.1.4  Oxidants

    Oxidants are a major class of compounds found in photochemical smog—a
major air pollution problem caused by atmospheric reactions of gases derived
from  the combustion of organic fuels. Emissions from motor vehicles are a
prime factor in the formation of photochemical smog in virtually all parts of
the country.  Other  factors  that  contribute  to smog formation  are  the
combustion  of fuels for heat and electric power, burning of refuse, evaporation
of petroleum products, and handling and use of organic solvents. The principal
                            GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
 identifiable oxidants in polluted urban air are ozone, the peroxyacyl nitrates
 (PAN), and the oxides of nitrogen (NOx), primarily nitrogen dioxide (N02).

    The most  commonly experienced effect of photochemical smog is eye
 irritation.  The components causing eye  irritation have not been  completely
 identified, but there  is  some  correlation between the  occurrence of eye
 irritation  and  overall  levels of oxidant in the  atmosphere.  There is a
 characteristic pungent odor associated with photochemical smog. Ozone is an
 acrid component of this odor.

    Studies have shown that it  is harder for humans, particularly  patients
 suffering from chronic respiratory  disease, to breathe in areas having even a
 moderate level of  photochemical air pollution (0.10 ppm  total oxidant or
 higher). In clinical studies of patients with chronic bronchopulmonary disease
 exposed to the ambient Los Angeles smog for 1-week (when compared to the
 effects  on the same patients breathing filtered air for a  similar period), the
 most significant and uniform effect of photochemical smog exposure was an
 increase in oxygen consumption and a decrease in oxygen content of the blood
 (decrease in oxygen tension in arterial blood) during light exercise. Thus, while
 the patients were consuming more oxygen, less of it was being made available
 to  the  body. There also was greater difficulty in breathing by the  patients
 (increased pulmonary airway resistance) when breathing the smoggy air.

    Air quality criteria for oxidants and ozone can be found in Appendix B.
 2.1.5 Oxides of Nitrogen

    Oxides  of nitrogen  (NOx)  are  a*1  important  group of  atmospheric
 contaminants in  many  communities.  They  are  produced during the high-
 temperature  combustion  of coal, oil,  gas, and gasoline in  power plants and
 internal  combustion engines. The combustion fixes atmospheric nitrogen to
 produce  the oxides. At the high temperatures, nitric oxide (NO) forms first; in
 the  atmosphere it reacts with oxygen and is converted to N02. While this
 oxidation is very  rapid at high concentrations, the rate is much slower at low
 concentrations. In sunlight, especially  in the presence of organic material as
 typified  by Los Angeles type photochemical smog, the conversion of NO to
 N02 is greatly accelerated.

    Nitrogen  dioxide,  an acutely irritating substance, is considerably more
 toxic than NO. In equal concentrations,  it is more injurious  than CO. The
 proven effects of N02  on man and lower animals are confined almost entirely
 to the respiratory tract. With increasing dosage, acute  effects are expressed as
 odor perception,  nasal  irritation,  discomfort in breathing, acute respiratory
 distress,  pulmonary edema,  and  death. The relatively low solubility of N02,
 however, permits penetration into the lower respiratory  tract.  Delayed or
 chronic pulmonary changes may occur  from high but sublethal concentrations
 and from repeated or continuous exposures to lesser concentrations.
Definitions of Episode Factors

-------
    It  should  be noted, however, that other considerations such as plant
damage, visibility reduction, or combined effects with other air pollutants may
be more critical than the adverse health effects of NO2 alone.
2.1.6 Other Pollutants

    There are, of course, many air pollutants other than those mentioned here;
and these may be  of prime importance in specific localities. Since episode
criteria have not yet been developed for these pollutants, they are not included
here.
 2.2 METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS RELATED
     TO AIR POLLUTION EPISODES

    The most important part of training in air pollution meteorology is that
 portion concerned with recognizing meteorological conditions associated with
 air pollution  episodes.  Conditions  that characterize large-scale air pollution
 potential are listed as the HAPPA criteria in Appendix C. For local authorities
 who  receive no teletype weather service,  there is a need to recognize the
 existence or imminence  of local episode conditions  that may or may not be
 part of a larger situation. Except for a difference in size of the affected area,
 criteria for episodes in a local community are the same as for a statewide area
 treated in a HAPPA.
 2.2.1  Local Considerations

    There  is considerable variation in the  types and degree of air pollution
 potential across the United States. The main factors causing these differences
 are  emission characteristics,  meteorology, and  topography.  For planning
 purposes, it is desirable to appreciate the nature of these differences, and it is
 necessary to identify the local "character" of a given area.

    Diurnal variations  are a part of the local  "character" and influence the
 strategy of episode control. Seasonal variations, such as predominantly oxidant
 pollution in summer and sulfur dioxide pollution in winter, may exist in some
 areas.

    The meteorological character of a region  is determined by geographical
 location and local topography.  Location  identifies the broad-scale weather
 patterns that dominate the area, and topography accounts largely for local
 variations  during particular weather situations. The National Oceanographic
 and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has adopted a classification based on
 similarity  of weather  conditions wherein  the contiguous United States is
 divided into eight atmospheric areas, shown in Figure 2-1.
10                          GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
s
o
 w
T3
 PS
 a

 i
                                                        I


                                                        j  GREAT PLAINS

                                                        I     AREA
                                               ,       j


                                          (*!-BUOUEROUE l!
                          NOAA METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE UNIT
                              Figure 2-1.  Atmospheric  areas of the continental  United States.

-------
    The  Appalachian  and  Rocky Mountain  areas  are  most  likely to  be
dominated by stagnant air masses  and light winds. The other areas are usually
well ventilated except for  local and transitory  variations, but the  prepon-
derance of sources renders them most subject to episode conditions, especially
when local  topographical conditions greatly modify the  general circulation
pattern. Topographic factors that can influence the general pattern include:

    1.  Terrain: Roughness,  profile, slope, elevation, valley spacing, and valley
       width.
          Flat, open  terrain is more exposed to broad-scale movement of air
       than is rough, mountainous terrain, and it is generally less subject to air
       pollution episodes.
    2.  Vegetation:  Dimensional characteristics, physical  properties,  and dis-
       tribution.
          Heavily wooded  clusters tend to develop a micro-climate under the
       leafy  canopy,  marked by light  winds  and temperature  inversion.
       Pollutants entering this regime may accumulate and persist longer than
       in nearby open areas.
    3.  Hydrology:  Shape, size,  distribution,  and dynamic properties of nearby
       water bodies.
          Adjacent land and water surfaces  absorb and radiate solar heat
       differently;  the resulting contrast in temperature  helps to drive the
       land-sea  breeze during the  warmer  months  of the year. In coastal
       communities,  when  the wind systems are weak,  pollution  tends to
       "slosh back and forth" with the diurnal reversals of the surface  wind,
       moving off the coast at night and returning inland by day.

    4.  Culture:  Degree of urbanization.
          Compared with surrounding countryside, urban areas influence local
       weather and pollution distributions in  the following ways:
       a. Winds: Man-made structures reduce the wind speed and channel the
          flow through streets that lie along the general wind direction, tinder
          some conditions, pollutants become  distributed in  waffle-shaped
          patterns following the city plan of streets. Peak concentrations may
          be lowered.

       b. Temperature:  Buildings retain incident daytime heat  and re-radiate
          at night  to the surrounding air, thus acting to  warm it through a
          layer that is several times higher than the urban skyline.
       c. Turbulence: The  higher temperature,  rougher  profile, blocking of
          wind, and  net  influx of air into the city act  to increase vertical
          motions of the air  above the  city. Pollutants that might otherwise
          accumulate  under a nocturnal temperature inversion become  dis-
          tributed through  the thicker layer  of atmospheric mixing above the
          city.

       d. Other Effects:  The  above  effects,  plus the  added presence  of
          particulate matter, act to increase cloudiness and precipitation near a


12                           GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
          city, particularly  downwind  from it; precipitation is  effective in
          removing pollutants from the air.

    Combinations of topographical factors, coupled with atmospheric processes
that vary with season, time of day, and dominating weather-map systems,
produce  complex  local wind patterns.  Two patterns associated with terrain
configurations are especially  important:

    1.  Ridges: Winds tend  to follow the orientation of ridges and troughs in
       "ribbed" or "washboard" terrain. Communities may be receptors  for
       pollution that is channeled over considerable distances along the valleys.
    2.  Cup-Shaped Valleys:  An industrial valley that is  virtually surrounded
       by peaks and ridges is particularly prone to hazardous levels of air
       pollution. During clear, still nights, cold air collects in pools and pockets
       at the valley bottom and may persist for long periods of time. Daytime
       heating sets  a  mountain-valley  circulation  in  motion,  but often
       pollutants are contained within the valley geometry because winds from
       an overriding weather system fail to penetrate the heavy air below.
 2.2.2 Atmospheric Indicators of Episode Development

    When the air "feels stale," when persistent layers of smoke and haze lie low
 over the landscape, and when winds create hardly a stir for several days on end,
 chances are that the region lies under the dome of a stagnant high-pressure area
 that covers a major portion of the country. This phenomenon is usually caused
 by a worldwide slowdown in the normal west-to-east process of the major high-
 and low-pressure systems. The slowdown may occur several times a year, and
 situations  conducive  to high  air  pollution are not infrequent over the entire
 United States.

    The high pollutant levels that mark the occurrence of air pollution episodes
 are caused by  the accumulation of emissions over urban areas for some time.
 Day-to-day variations in  total emissions do not  ordinarily account for the
 observed rise in ambient  concentrations. The principal  factor  is  the meteoro-
 logical condition. Usually, pollutants are distributed through the atmosphere by
 the actions of outward-moving winds and upward-moving air currents. From
 time  to time, however, certain features in the atmosphere (inversions) appear
 to "clamp  a lid" over broad areas, limiting vertical transport; slackening winds
 restrict the horizontal transport  of pollutants. When  these natural conditions
 occur in regions with air pollution sources and sensitive receptors and stagnate
 for an unusually long period of time, episode potential is high.
2.2.2.1  Mixing Height

    Of the two atmospheric properties  that  limit pollutant transport—wind
speed and  mixing height-the latter is relatively unfamiliar to  non-meteorol-
Definitions of Episode Factors                                          13

-------
ogists  and may need  explanation. Physically, mixing height is  the  vertical
extent of turbulent motion within the  layer of air next to the ground. The
turbulence may be generated by solar heating of the ground, passage of wind
across  rough surfaces below, or by a combination of both. When the wind is
fresh and gusty or when tall cumulus clouds indicate vigorous upward currents
from solar heating, the mixing layer is deep and  pollutants are well diluted.
When the air is still, the ground relatively cold, fog  and smoke banks low-lying,
and the  barometer  higher than  average, the mixing layer is  shallow, and
pollutant concentrations could be high. With normal daytime heating, mixing
layers  that are  shallow in the morning deepen considerably by afternoon. At
night,  as the ground cools, the mixing height again decreases.


2.2.2.2 Lapse Rate and Stability

    A  discussion of mixing height  requires some explanation of lapse rate and
stability. Lapse rate is the  rate at which atomospheric temperature is observed
to decrease with elevation. It is the vertical temperature profile, which can be
measured by balloon-borne  radiosonde and other methods.  On the average,
temperature decreases about 3.5° F with every 1,000 feet of rise, up to the
base of the stratosphere some 6 miles high. The decrease is seldom steady, even
in  the free  atmosphere well  above the  ground.  Through  some  layers, the
temperature  drop may  be  faster  or  slower than through  other layers.
Sometimes the temperature holds steady through the layer; the layer is then
said to be isothermal. Sometimes the temperature rises with ascent; the layer is
then said to be  an inversion.

    If  a parcel of air is carried upward by  thermal or wind turbulence, it
expands and cools at the rate of 5.4° F per 1,000 feet, provided no moisture
condenses out. This  rate  of  cooling is called the dry adiabatic  lapse rate.
Ascending air must be  replaced by descending or inflowing air, and a vertical
circulation may develop. Descending or subsiding air becomes warmer at the
adiabatic rate.  Thus, an atmospheric layer characterized by a dry adiabatic
lapse rate is or has been a region of significant vertical motion.

    In  a  layer in which  the  lapse rate exceeds  the dry  adiabatic (super-
adiabatic), vigorous vertical motion can begin "spontaneously." Such a layer is
said to be unstable, because the vertical motion is self-perpetuating.

    Layers in which the lapse rate is less than the  dry adiabatic are said to be
stable, because  vertical motions are limited. The normal lapse rate of 3.5° F per
1,000  feet describes a stable condition;  an isothermal condition is more stable;
and an inversion condition in the most stable of all. An inversion layer tends to
suppress vertical motion from below. When a mixing layer is shallow, it is often
so because a strong inversion caps the surface layers of air.

    Figure 2-2 show how an inversion may define the top of a mixing layer. In
the morning, the mixing layer hugs the ground at the base of the nocturnal
14                          GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
 inversion. As daytime heating erodes the inversion, the mixing layer rises to 1.4
 kilometers, about 4,600 feet. Note that the daytime lapse rate is identical to
 the dry adiabatic lapse rate projected upward from the maximum afternoon
 temperature at the ground.
 O
      2.0
 -1-    1.5


       1.0


       0.5

SURFACE
           MAXIMUM MIXING HEIGHT
ATYPICAL NIGHTTIME.
'SURFACE INVERSjONy
                                               ADIABATIC LAPSE
                                                     RATE      _J
                                   V
                     DAYTIME:
                      MIXED
                      LAYER
                         *
TYPICAL
DAYTIME
:  LAPSE
  RATE
                                        DAILY MAXIMUM
                              TEMPERATURE—*-
    Figure 2-2.  Schematic representation of the effect of vertical
                 temperature gradient on atmospheric  mixing.
    Emissions responsible for episodes are the same as those responsible for
 "chronic" air pollution.  Generally,  these  emissions are  sulfur  dioxide,
 particulates,  and oxidants, or combinations of these in different proportions. It
 is a familiar fact that oxidants are at present the greatest recognized problem in
 Los Angeles; particulates and sulfur dioxide are serious problems on the East
 Coast. The need for basing emergency control actions on the local problem is
 clear.  Plans  must  be  flexible  because emission characteristics are certain to
 change with  time in kind and quantity due to improved but unequal control of
 pollutants.
 Definitions of Episode Factors
                                                                  15

-------
             3.  EMERGENCY  ACTION PLAN
 3.1  INTRODUCTION

     This  section  discusses  the
                                              _,_
 Emergenc>rAclionTIi51|EAPj/fhe intent js^not to spell out a universal model
~plaii~but to provide a woriclist of ife^"itnars¥ouI3Te considered in designing _
~aria~TmpIe]men'ting a plan. Each area or region contains special ccmditiom and
TirriTtafions, and each planning item must be consideredrin" the light of local
"^requirements. For those areas that are parts of federally designated Air Quality
"'Control Regions, the  State  must submit to  APCO acceptable Emergency
 Action Plans as part of the implementation plan for the region.

    The necessity for  careful  and detailed  pre-planning, cannot be .over-
 empTiasTzed; the  time  for reaction jnay j>£  iT matter  of hours. Planning is
 necessary to insure that the required equipment, resources, personnel, ..and
 procedures  are available and the desired communications^ and control actions^
 are ready to be implemented. An air pollution episode is an unusual  event; the
 emergency actions may  be appreciably rnoje drastic Jhan the normal abatement .
 activities undertaken to meet long-term air quality goals.

    The major elements of an EAP are shown in Figure 3-1 .

    In  preparing  the   subsequent  material in  this  section,  the  following
 generalizations were made:

    1. The existence of an air pollution control authority is essential, that is,
       the community  does have  at least  one official responsible  for air
       pollution control. The position could be filled by a member of the local
       health department.

    2. The number of significant stationary emission sources is relatively small,
       approximately five to ten.
    3. The community is located in an episode-prone area.
    4. The  population  falls  into  the 10,000 to 30,000 range and has the
       municipal services and departments typical of such communities.
                                   17

-------
     WEATHER
     FACTORS
        AIR
     QUALITY
   OBSERVATION
      SOURCE
    INVENTORY
                          SOCIO-
                        ECONOMIC
                         FACTORS
                        DECISION
                        CRITERIA
                         EMISSION
                      CURTAILMENT
                       EMERGENCY ACTION
                              PLAN
       Figure 3-1. Elements of an  Emergency Action Plan.
                                                             J
3.2 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FORMULATION
   There are actually two phases involved in the creation of an EAP. One
phase  must be  formulated for  activities within the air pollution  control
authority itself,  while the  second  relates to the interactions between the
authority and others such as governmental agencies, sources of pollution, and
news media. The integration of these two elements into a single "master plan"
involves the following considerations  and activities.

3.2.1 Responsibility and Authority

   1. Determine the boundaries of the control area and explore cooperative
      relations with adjoining areas; decide on interagency strategies in calling
      alerts; examine special boundary problems.
18
GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
   2. Establish the lines of authority for emergency actions.  Local agencies
     often have  authority that has been delegated by the State; but in such
     cases the final responsibility still lies with the State.
   3. Determine whether an advisory emergency committee will be part  of the
     plan; each member should have-an alternate.
   4. Establish the legal  authority to  exercise emergency control actions,
     including civil or criminal law enforcement tools.
   5. Obtain  the approval of the  mayor, appropriate  State  authority,  and
     APCO (if a federally designated region).

3.2.2  Emergency Action Criteria

    1.  Assemble the available information on emission sources and air quality
       to define the local situation.

    2.  Establish a committee to review and recommend criteria; the committee
       should include the disciplines of  medicine, meteorology, air pollution
       engineering, government, and law and public safety (police).
    3.  Review the criteria that have been adopted in other similar areas,  if any;
       prepare  arguments  for  revising  them or  developing new criteria,
       considering episode-proneness, local air quality status, and controllable
       elements.

    4.  Determine the responsibility and establish procedures for  emergency
       actions.

    5.  Plan for annual review of criteria, or special review following a major
       episode.
3.2.y Background Information

    1.  Develop  emission  inventory data, using  records  of other agencies
       (Planning, etc.) where possible; develop means for updating periodically.

    2.  Define the air  quality observation  program  necessary  to recognize
       pre-episode conditions.

    3.  Define the physical  data  to be obtained during potential and actual
       episodes.

         tablish procedures  for  reviewing data during potential  and actual
          ;odes.
        mergency Source-Curtailment Actions

       Establish the possible emission-curtailment actions to be taken for:

       a.  Power generation.


Emergency Action Plan

-------
       b.  Other industrial sources, by class and size.
       c.  Commercial sources, by class and size.

       d. Incineration and open burning: municipal, commercial, construction,
         and residential.
    2.  Establish which actions  should  be voluntary  and which should  be
       mandatory.
    3.  Define inspection and enforcement procedures, including personnel and
       equipment requirements.


3.2.5  Communications

    1.  Establish  direct communications with personnel at  major emission
       sources; establish contacts and alternates for each.
    2.  Determine the information desired by State and Federal authorities and
       the form in which it is desired.

    3.  Design the local information system utilizing police, civil defense, public
       safety, and private communication links; coordinate with each to define
       their roles. (Police and taxicab radios can serve as emergency communi-
       cation networks.)
    4.  Prepare  sample news releases; consult with other control  agencies
       experienced in problems of dealing with the public in these matters.

    5.  Develop  recommendations to  local medical  groups on advising  their
       patients.


3.2.6  Reporting

    1.  Determine  whether  legal documentation of data  is  required; if so,
       simply the HAPPA bulletin  plus local sampling station measurements
       may suffice.
    2.  Prepare an outline for a technical summary report; include a record of
       the times of emission curtailment actions, air quality observations, and
       observed effects, as well as the climatology of the event.
3.3  EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

   The EAP provides for the flow of information between different elements
and allows for appreciable interaction between the elements. The information
flow into the authority includes data on the current status of the atmosphere.
Information  is also required on both pollutant emissions and the availability of


20                          GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
control actions. The authority interprets the incoming information and, using
judgment in  conjunction with such tools as atmospheric dispersion estimates,
predicts the present and future status of the atmosphere. The prediction is then
compared  with the air quality criteria established. If  the defined levels of
pollutant exposure and expected persistence of meteorological conditions are
reached, the authority calls an alert.

    When an alert has been called, information then flows outward from the
authority  as  planned  actions  for  control of  emissions  and  information
dissemination are executed. Typical communications at this point include:
    1.  Notification to pertinent personnel  of  requirements for increased air
       quality observations, meteorological measurements, and inspections.
    2.  Notification to those people most susceptible to acute health problems.
    3.  Notification to  the public (through news media), interested  public
       officials, and public agencies of the present status.
    4.  Notification to management of pollutant sources of the requirement to
       reduce emissions hi accordance with the EAP.

    As the pollution sources reduce emissions into the atmosphere, the effects
are  detected  by  air quality observations; depending  on local conditions,
pollutant levels either hold, continue to rise, or  decrease. If the pollutant levels
rise, it may be necessary to take more drastic control actions. Surveillance of
air quality and effects continues until the episode terminates. At that point,
communications similar to those listed above  are utilized  to reduce or stop
observations, inform all interested public parties,  and allow sources to resume
normal operating conditions.

    The  following subsections  will discuss  those  elements both within  and
outside the authority that must be  considered in the implementation of an
EAP. Each community will have different requirements, budgets, and legal
instruments. It is,  therefore, impossible to cover all possibilities, and the reader
should relate his circumstances  to the discussion  with judgment. Familiarity
with problems encountered by other similar agencies can be a valuable  source
of practical information on plan implementation and communication.
3.3.1  Emission Source Inventory

    If the impact  of emissions from specific sources of pollution  is to be
estimated, such emissions must be quantified. More importantly, if emissions
are to be reduced during episodes, the possible means of curtailment must be
identified. It is therefore recommended that the authority obtain as  much of
the following information, in as  much  detail  as possible, that is available. A
questionnaire  may  be used but, if the number of sources  is not too great,
visitation and consultation is the  method suggested for gathering the following
information:
    1. General information.


Emergency Action Plan                                                21

-------
      a. Location and property boundaries.
      b. Plant capacity, normal and maximum.
      c. Fuel usage by shift, month, and season.
      d. Fuel type and composition, especially sulfur and ash content.
      e. Fuel heating value.
      f. Input-material flow rates.
      g. Number and frequencies of operating levels if process is continuous.
      h. Number and frequencies of "batches" if process is "batch."
      i. Source emission height and stack diameter.
      j. Emission rate of pollutants per unit of input material.
      k. Emission gas flow rates and temperatures, including variation.
      1. Individuals (and their telephone numbers) to be contacted on air
         pollution matters.
      m. Type, efficiency, and cost of pollution control equipment.
      n. Plans and expansion.
      o. Process flow diagrams.
      p. Interruptability of batch processes.
    2. Dual fuel capability.
      a. Advance notice desired.
      b. Alternate fuel, ash and sulfur content.
      c. Time required to switch fuel.
      d. Seasonal availability.of alternate fuel.
      e. Added cost of dual fuel capabilities.
    3. Process curtailment capability.
      a. Advance notice required.
      b. Curtailment methods.
      c. Emission rate after curtailment.
      d. Number of employees released on curtailment.
      e. Estimated economic loss per day of curtailment.
    In some cases,  the source management will not be able to supply pollutant
emission rates; if  not,  rates  may be estimated by techniques  described in
Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors* Additional assistance may be
obtained from  either the appropriate  State agency or the  Control Agency
Development Division, APCO.

22                          GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
 3.3.2 Air Quality Observations

 3.3.2.1 Pollutant Monitoring

    Monitoring of atmospheric pollutants by means of sophisticated continu-
 ous equipment  is not recommended. Operation of such equipment requires
 technological  skills not usually available within the  authority. Furthermore,
 such units are relatively expensive to install and operate. Some quantification
 of episode levels should be obtained, however.

    For particulate matter, the Spot Tape Sampler may be used. It allows the
 measurement  of spoiling-type  particles in the air that generally  accumulate
 during episode conditions. One unit, plus its companion Spot Evaluator, can
 be purchased  for  under $1,000.  It does not require a highly skilled operator
 and can  be maintained for approximately $200 annually.  The  Spot Tape
 Sampler's  accuracy  and frequency  of measurement are sufficient  for the
 purpose   of determining  episode  criteria.  Appendix D contains detailed
 information on this device.

    Visual color comparators have been used  for short-term measurement of
 SOj and oxidants, including N02. The application of such comparators has
 been  restricted  to field survey  work where  electric power and laboratory
 facilities are limited. The use of visual color techniques for measuring pollutant
 levels  during episode conditions is suggested. Advantages are small initial cost
 and simplicity of operation. Usually a low-volume air pump (battery operated),
 suitable  for aspirating the  air  sample through a specific reagent to obtain the
 desired colored  solution, is used. The colored  reagent  is then matched  to a
 colored glass filter that has the appropriate spectral characteristics of a known
 concentration of the desired constituent. The major disadvantage of the color
 comparator is  its limited accuracy. Satisfactory agreement (within 20 percent)
 was obtained between  the visual comparator and spectrophotometric methods
 for S02  and N02. The oxidant  method has  been shown to  result in values
 somewhat  higher than those obtained with the neutral  buffered KI methods.
 These  disadvantages, however, are  not  a  serious obstacle under episode
 conditions. A sampling  train, a comparator,  and standard  color disks for
 measuring  S02, N02) and oxidants (with instructions for their use)  are
 commercially available for well under $500.
3.3.2.2  Meteorological Monitoring
    For the purpose of episode determination, meteorological monitoring is
not recommended for the same reasons advanced for not using sophisticated air
quality  monitoring.  Two  courses  are open to the local authority to  obtain
weather information needed to make action decisions.

    Arrangements should  be made with  the Weather Service for the local
authority  to receive  HAPPA  bulletins when issued and for consultation with
Emergency Action Plan                                                23

-------
Weather Service personnel whenever the authority has reason to believe that
the locality may be experiencing episode conditions, even though no NOAA
advisory has been issued. It is important to note that the NOAA advisories are
concerned exclusively with meteorological conditions and not with air quality
per  se.  An advisory  simply  states that atmospheric  conditions  that  are
conducive to poor air quality are imminent and are expected to last for a day
or more.  The burden is then on the authority to determine whether its area of
responsibility  is  indeed affected  and,  if so, what action should  be  taken.
Appendix C describes  the  HAPPA Program, and Appendix  E shows  the
Weather Service offices throughout the country.

    Meteorological data such as wind speed, wind direction, and mixing depths
are also available from the Weather Service. These data should be obtained on
an hourly basis during  episode periods. If for some reason these data are not
available, hourly  averages of wind speed and direction  may be  made by an
observer at the local airport.
 3.3.2.3 Local Observations

    The local authority must also rely heavily upon pertinent information and
 observations from local sources in order to judge the imminence or severity of
 an air pollution episode. These data may include:

    1. Reports or observations of persistent poor visibility. Hourly visibility
       measurements should be made  and recorded during  episode periods.
       These can  be made by observing familiar objects located  at known
       distances from the observer.

    2. Reports  or observations  of  malodors.  A record  of odor  location,
       strength, type, and frequency should be kept. These data can serve as an
       index to the progression of the episode conditions.

    3. Reports from doctors and hospitals on sharp increases in cases involving
       respiratory  and allergic conditions. Daily communications  should  be
       established   with  local medical  personnel to  obtain  data  on  the
       occurrence  of respiratory ailments during these periods.
3.3.3  Atmospheric Dispersion Estimation

    When information relative to the emissions of pollutants from a source, i.e.,
concentration, height of release, and other physical  data (Section 3.3.1), is
available in conjunction with data concerning wind  speed, direction, atmo-
spheric stability, and mixing height, it is possible for any technically intelligent
layman to estimate the dispersion of the pollutants. These estimates can aid in
determining the  need for a specific source to reduce its emissions in order to
avoid an episode. They  also  allow the authority to  predict the  relative
24                          GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
 accumulation of pollution from specific sources as weather  stagnation is
 forecast to persist.

    The reference document for modeling is D. Bruce Turner's  Workbook of
 Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates,4  available  on request from APCO's  Air
 Pollution Technical Information Center (APTIC).

    The only simplifications recommended beyond those already presented
 are:

    1. Stability:  Use D curves for morning conditions, B curves for afternoon.
    2. Mixing height: Assume it lies well above  the point source plume so
       that, for  downwind concentrations measured over  a period of 1 or 2
       hours, it is necessary to work only with the Gaussian model.

    3. Effective  stack height:  Add  an extra  one-third to the known  stack
       height to  account  for plume  rise; or if the average wind  is under 4
       meters per second, double the stack height.

    4. Since wind speed appears in the denominator on the right-hand side of
       the Gaussian diffusion equation,  the expression fails under zero wind
       conditions. Assume, however, a non-zero wind of 2 meters per second,
       since wind speed should average out through the mixing layer, and  the
       probability of dead calm through the entire layer is small.

    Examples of atmospheric diffusion estimation by means of the described
 technique are found in Appendix F.
 3.3.4 Communications

    A potential or actual episode requires rapid control response to changes in
 meteorological conditions and pollutant levels. This requirement means that
 the design of a communications plan is one of the most important elements in
 the  implementation  of an  EAP.  A major portion of the communications
 network is used to transmit status reports and control actions to non-control-
 agency personnel. Individuals and agencies needing such information include:

    1. Public Officials—Mayor, Governor, city  council, health commissioner,
       etc., who may  be  called  upon  to  participate in  a decision-making
       process.
    2. Personnel  at  Major  Emission Sources—Personnel  at major emission
       sources  require  alert-status reports to effect  source  control plans
       designed to reduce emissions. If execution of such plans is mandatory, a
       formal system may be required for legal notification of the alert status.

    3. Public Safety  Agencies-The police, fire, civil defense, and public health
       departments may be assigned definite tasks during an alert and need to
Emergency Action Plan                                                25

-------
      be kept informed on the status of the event. In some locations, existing
      civil defense, disaster,  or  emergency networks and  procedures may be
      available for use. The telephone company, though not a public agency,
      similarly needs  to  be  informed, mainly because of the  possibility of
      overloading facilities.
    4. Sensitive Persons—Those  people who  are most susceptible to acute
      health problems must be kept advised during an episode. Thus there
      must be a coordinated effort between the local air pollution officials,
      public health officials, physicians, hospitals, and the  public. It may be ill
      advised to notify these sensitive people via the  public news media as it is
      important  that  the physician be able -to detect whether a particular
      patient is reacting  physiologically to the pollution levels or  psycholog-
      ically  to the episodes. Communicating information through the local
      health agency or medical society may be more advisable.
    5. General Public and News Media—A direct communications link to the
      major sources of local news media in the area is required. The use of
      good judgment in dealing with news media is extremely important, and
      consultation with those experienced in this procedure is highly desirable.
      An example of a typical episode news release is shown in Figure 3-2.

    An  office  proximate to  the local police  communications  center  is
recommended for the  emergency operations  control  center.  It  should be
equipped with a minimum of two telephones with separate lines that are at the
disposal  of the authority during  activation of the EAP. Files  should be
provided for all pre-collected information,  necessary workbooks, and refer-
ences; "desk-top" space  for activities such as map-plotting and calculations
should be included also.

    Staggered schedules for regular communications with observers, emission
sources,  other  public  agencies and officials, and  the  news media must be
established in order to prevent "tie-up" of telephone  and radio channels of
contact.
3.3.5  Socio-Economic Factors

3.3.5.1  Social Considerations

    In the broadest sense, social considerations encompass all those factors that
relate to human society, the welfare of human beings as members of society,
the  interaction  of the individual and  the  group,  and the cooperative and
interdependent relationships of members of the group. This section is restricted
to a rather narrow field of human behavior. There are several social factors that
the episode planner must prepare for.

    1. It must be realized that any action whatsoever that is taken will have a
      social effect.


26                           GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
 NEWS R&EASE -  (Date)                    	Agency
                                         Department of A1r Pollution Control
                                         (Address)
                                         (City)
 TOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                    CONTACT:  (Staff Member  - Phone No.)

     At  12:30 p.m. today (date), the local  Weather Service notified the City's
 Department of A1r Pollution Control that weather conditions consisting of a
 high pressure area and low wind speeds were developing in the metropolitan
     (dty)	area.  These are the same weather conditions that are
 being  formed over the Eastern seaboard from Maine to the Carol1nas.  These
 weather  conditions are expected to continue until late tomorrow  (date) and
 may result 1n an Increase 1n the levels of some air pollutants.
     "There has been some Increase 1n the levels of sulfur dioxide, but the
 proportions of other contaminants have not reached a point at which calling of
 an  'air  pollution alert1 1s necessary or required," stated Mr. 	,
 (title).
     Mr. 	also announced that the Air Pollution Control
 Department's laboratory had been placed on a 24-hour operational  basis.
 Hortnally, the staff works a 40-hour week while the instruments measuring
 air quality record their results continually without attention around
 the clock. "However1) the     (title)     said,"ln order to be fully cognizant
 of  the problems as they arise, we shall maintain a close watch on the
 conditions and report to the public if there is need for any specific
 activity." Mr. 	, air pollution specialist for the   (city)
 Weather  Service, stated that because cool air at the surface was  trapped by
 a lid  of warm air aloft, 1t would remain stagnant over the   (city)    area.
 It  1s  expected that the Department of A1r Pollution Control  will  issue another
 statement within 24 hours.

                   Figure 3-2.  Sample press release.
Emergency Action Plan

-------
    2.  Generally, these  effects will increase with the duration of the episode.
    3.  Initially, the effects will be in the nature of inconveniences.
    4.  The effects are primarily those related to restrictions on normal activity
       and the anxieties associated with a pervasive hazard from which there is
       no escape.
    5.  Finally, with  some exceptions, these  effects disappear at the termina-
       tion of the episode.

    The  principal means  available to the local authority to minimize  these
types  of social effects is through a program  of public education. The episode
planner  must provide  for  an  effective  public  information program  before,
during, and  after an episode. The  public must be  prepared to endure  the
inconveniences of personal restrictions and to assess calmly the nature of the
hazard. Figure 3-3 displays a sample public information approach.

    While  the public in smaller communities will face only minor inconven-
iences, s :ch as  restriction of  backyard  refuse  burning,  certain emotional
individuals  and  some  citizens with  severe  heart or respiratory disease will
undoubtedly become alarmed. The local  authority must be  able to reassure
such persons that they will be protected from possible injurious effects by
either a reduction of source emissions or a warning to leave the immediate area
of high pollution until the episode terminates.


3.3.5.2 Economic Considerations

    It  is important  to  appreciate the fact that the benefits  of improved air
quality are as difficult to assess as are the many costs of air pollution control.
As with any health-related control program, the costs involve human factors
that are difficult to express as equivalent dollars. For "episode  control,"  the
benefits include the avoidance of acute illness and death. The duration of much
of the economic impact is a few days; when human lives are involved, the costs
involved in control are relatively slight compared to the possible benefits.

    During the source inventory,  information can be gathered that will  assist
the  authority in evaluating part of the economic impact of emergency action
options. It is to industry's advantage to release accurate economic and emission
data  to help insure that  designed  actions are realistic and effective. The
necessary  information  may be  supplied  voluntarily  or regulations may be
required. The control authority should observe industrial proprietary rights to
economic and technical  information.

    The costs incurred by industry during  an episode will be a combination of
the  fixed  or regularly  recurring  costs associated with being  prepared for an
episode, and costs approximately proportional  to the duration of emergency
abatement action during an episode. Both of these classes of costs will vary


28                           GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
         WHEN  AIR  POLLUTION   IS  HEAVY


       Here's what you can do to help yourself and your neighbor

        .  Use public transportation wherever possible.  Use your
            automobile only If absolutely necessary.  If you must
            drive, try to team up with neighbors or co-workers.

                      AIR POLLUTION FROM AUTOMOBILES
                            IS A MAJOR PROBLEM

        .  Reduce room temperatures to the  legal minimum, unless
                health considerations prevent such action.
                  AIR POLLUTION FROM HEATING EQUIPMENT
                          IS A MAJOR PROBLEM

                      .  Stop all outdoor burning.

                AIR POLLUTION FROM OPEN OR  REFUSE BURNING
                           IS A MAJOR PROBLEM
           .  Use as little electricity as  possible, either for
                          lighting or appliances.

                       AIR POLLUTION FROM POWER PLANTS
                              IS A MAJOR PROBLEM
       Observe the restrictions recommended by your health department
                     or air pollution control agency.
      IF YOU SUFFER FROM A RESPIRATORY AILMENT OR  HEART CONDITION-

                  Remaln Indoors with the windows  closed.

           Don't smoke.  Avoid rooms where others  are smoking.

                 Eliminate unnecessary physical  exertion.

                      Stay under your physician's  care.
             AIR POLLUTION CONTRIBUTES TO RESPIRATORY DISEASE


Figure 3-3.  Flyer published by the National Tuberculosis and  Res-
              piratory Disease Association.
                                                                      29
 Emergency Action Plan

-------
widely in magnitude and nature from place to place, among types of industries,
and among various plants within each industry. Consequently, data should be
collected from each individual plant or plant classification.
3.3.6  Emergency Action Plan Criteria

    Following  are  the  suggested EAP criteria that  trigger  the pre-planned
episode emission reduction scheme:

    1.  Status:  Forecast—The Forecast level indicates that an internal watch
       will  be  activated by a Weather Service HAPPA or equivalent report
       stating  that a high air pollution potential will  exist  for the next  36
       hours.

    2.  Status:  Alert-The Alert  level is that concentration  of pollutants at
       which short-term health effects can be expected to occur. An Alert will
       be declared when any one of the following levels is reached:
         SO2—0.3 ppm, 24-hour average
         Particulate—3.0 Coh, 24-hour average
         S02   and Particulate combined—Product of  24-hour S02  average
           (ppm) and Coh equal to 0.2
         CO—15 ppm, 8-hour average
         Ox-0.1 ppm, 1-hour average

       and  adverse  meteorological conditions are expected to continue for  12
       or more hours.

    3.  Status:  Warning— The Warning level indicates that air quality is contin-
       uing to  deteriorate and that additional abatement actions are necessary.
       A Warning  will  be declared when any one of the  following levels is
       reached:
         S02—0.6 ppm, 24-hour average
         Particulate—6.0 Coh, 24-hour average
         Combined S02 and Con-Product of 24-hour S02 average (ppm)
           and Coh equal to 1.0
         CO—30 ppm, 8-hour average
         Ox—0.4 ppm, 1-hour average
       and adverse  meteorological conditions are expected to continue for  12
       or more hours.

    4.  Status:  Emergency-lias  Emergency  level  is  that  level at which a
       substantial endangerment  to  human health can be  expected. These
       criteria are absolute in the sense that they represent a level of pollution
       that  must not be  allowed to  occur. An Emergency  will be declared
       when it becomes  apparent that  any one  of the following levels is
       imminent:
30                          GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
          SO2 — 1.0 ppm, 24-hour average
          Particulate-10 Coh, 24-hour average
          Combined S02 and Coh-Product of 24-hour S02  average (ppm)
           and Coh of 2.4
          CO— 50 ppm, 8-hour average
               75 ppm, 4-hour average
              125 ppm, 1-hour average
          Ox—0.4 ppm, 4-hour average
              0.6 ppm, 2-hour average
              0.7 ppm, 1-hour average

    It should be made clear that an Air Pollution Alert, Warning, or Emergency
 can be declared on  the basis  of deteriorating air quality alone; a High Air
 Pollution Potential Advisory need not be in effect. The  appropriate episode
 status should be declared when any monitoring site records ambient air quality
 below  that designated  in the  criteria.  The criteria  should  be applied to
 individual monitoring sites and not to area-wide air quality.

    The levels used to designate an Air Pollution Emergency are those that pose
 an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health. Because  these
 levels should not be permitted.to occur, an Air Pollution Emergency should be
 declared when it appears imminent that these levels may be reached.
 3.3.7 Emission Curtailment

    The  reduction  of pollutant emissions as a measure to avoid potential
 episodes requires information not  ordinarily available to the local authority.
 Information pertaining to fuel switching, power interchange, curtailment, and
 postponement operations  can only be obtained through the development of a
 close and knowledgeable contact  with the  source management. These data
 should be obtained as part of the emission inventory. In many instances the
 switching to a lower-sulfur-content fuel, postponement of refuse combustion,
 and curtailment of nonessential production  operations such  as the filling of
 reservoirs are  adequate emission-reduction procedures. Each source manage-
 ment should be required to submit curtailment plans  covering the elements as
 described in the source inventory  section, and the operational  changes to be
 made in curtailing emissions.

    The public may be requested to help reduce emissions by keeping heating
 and electrical loads to a minimum. All private incineration and open burning
 should be curtailed.

    The curtailment of major sources can be  planned  to be implemented on a
 voluntary basis.  The voluntary actions to  be taken should be known to the
 authority, and  surveillance  should be  conducted as  though the  curtailment
 were  mandatory. Experience  to date  with  voluntary compliance by major
Emergency Action Plan

-------
 emitters has been excellent, and indicates that pollution control is more easily
 achieved in the "emergency" case than in the "chronic" case. It is not difficult,
 however, to obtain legal authority in the form of a court order for curtailment
 of emissions in an emergency situation. In fact, it is recommended that the
 legal groundwork be previously laid if a state of extreme noncooperation by
 personnel at major emission sources is found to exist.

    A list  of possible  actions to be taken to reduce emissions during the two
 curtailment phases of the EAP are as follows:

    1. "Watch" situations:
       a.  Delay the start-up of any new industrial process.

       b.  Postpone industrial plant start-ups or shutdowns.
       c.  Request that  all power-generating facilities have available a 5-day
           supply  of low-sulfur fuel (oil or gas)  wherever fuel  switching is
           possible.

       d.  Request that  municipal,  home,  commercial,  and governmental
           incineration be minimized.
       e.  Prohibit all open burning.

    2. "Alert" situations:

       a. Prohibit the use of home, municipal, commercial, governmental, and
           industrial incineration.

       b. Prohibit the use of high-sulfur, high-ash fuels for power generation.
       c. Prohibit the cleaning  of storage  vessels that  contained toxic  or
           odorous compounds.

       d.  Request that all industrial sources reduce  activities to a minimum,
           and put into effect all emission curtailment plans.

       e.  Request the  public to  reduce  motor  vehicle activity, use  of
           electricity, and home heating or air conditioning to a minimum level.
32                           GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
                         4.  SUMMARY
   The following items should be considered when formulating a typical EAP.
For convenience, they are  arranged as an annotated Table of Contents for a
typical EAP.
   Item

    1. Administration

      1.1 Authorization



      1.2 Purpose

      1.3 Organization


      1.4 Levels of Activation
Remarks
Specifies  the  general functions of the
EAP and assigns responsibilities for  its
operation.

States  what the EAP is to accomplish.

Defines the relationships within and
outside the authority.

As defined in Section 3.3.6.
   2. Operations
      2.1 Manning


      2.2 Schedule


      2.3 Duties

      2.4 Communications


      2.5 Data Logging
Specifies the number and skills of per-
sonnel involved in the EAP.

Specifies the  sequence of EAP opera-
tions.

Statements of responsibilities.

Specifies  procedures,   schedules,  and
facilities.

Instructions for recording  of all infor-
mation.
      2.6 Criteria for Activation     As defined in Section 3.3.6.
                                   33

-------
    Item

    2. Operations—Continued
       2.7 Activation Procedures
       2.8 Coordination with
           Other Agencies

       2.9 Means of Emissions
           Reduction

       2.10 Decision Criteria
       Remarks
       Specifies the  steps required to imple-
       ment action phases.

       Specifies procedures by which advice
       and assistance are obtained.

       Specifies control strategies available.
       Criteria, designed for the specific com-
       munity, which trigger voluntary or man-
       datory controls.
    3.  Termination of Emergency
       3.1  AU-Clear


       3.2  Reverting to Routine



       3.3  After-Action Report
       Criteria for all-clear; specify who must
       be notified.

       Instructions for terminating operations,
       releasing personnel, disposition of data,
       etc.

       Specifies the  format, author, and con-
       tent of the post-episode report.
34
GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
                      5.  REFERENCES
1.  Lynn, D. A., B. J. Steigerwald, and J. H. Ludwig. The November-December
   1962 Air Pollution  Episode in the  Eastern United States. U.S. DHEW,
   Division  of  Air Pollution.  Cincinnati,  Ohio.  1964. PHS Publication No.
   999-AP-7.

2.  Fensterstock, J. C., and R. K. Fankhauser. Thanksgiving 1966 Air Pollution
   Episode in the Eastern United States. U.S. DHEW, PHS, CPEHS, National
   Air Pollution Control Administration. Durham, N.C. 1968. NAPCA Publica-
   tion No. AP-45.

3.  Duprey, R. L. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. U.S. DHEW,
   PHS, CPEHS, National Air Pollution Control Administration. Raleigh, N.C.
   1968. PHS Publication No. 999-AP-42.

4.  Turner, D. B. Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates. U.S. DHEW,
   PHS, CPEHS, National Air Pollution Control Administration. Cincinnati,
   Ohio. Revised  1969. PHS Publication No. 999-AP-26.
                                35

-------
                        APPENDIX A.
    GLOSSARY OF  AIR POLLUTION TERMS
1. Acute
2. Aerosol
3. Air Pollution
4. Air Pollution Index
5. Ambient Air Quality
6. Anticyclone




7. Atmosphere, The



8. Atmosphere, An
Having  a  sudden  onset and  a short and
relatively severe course.

A  dispersion  of solid or liquid particles  of
microscopic size in gaseous media. Examples
are smoke, fog, and mist.

The presence of unwanted material in the air.
The term "unwanted material" refers to ma-
terial  in sufficient amount and under such
circumstances as to interfere significantly with
comfort, health, or welfare of persons, or with
full use and enjoyment of property.

One of a number of arbitrarily derived mathe-
matical  combinations  of air pollutants that
gives a single  number attempting to  describe
the amibient air quality.

A  physical  and  chemical measure  of the
concentration  of  various chemicals  in the
outside air. The quality is usually determined
over a specific  time period (for example, 5
minutes, 1 hour, 1 day).

An area of relatively high atmospheric pres-
sure. In the northern hemisphere, the wind
blows spirally outward in a clockwise  direc-
tion.

The whole mass of air,  composed largely  of
oxygen  and  nitrogen,  that surrounds the
earth.

A  specific gaseous mass,  occurring either
                                 37

-------
 9. Breathing Zone


10. Coh


11. Collection Efficiency



12. Collector




13. Combustion




14. Density

15. Diffusion, Molecular




16. Dispersion



17. Diurnal



18. Dust




19. Dust Fall


20. Dust Loading


38
 naturally  or artificially, that can contain any
 number of constituents  and in any  propor-
 tion.

 That stratum  of the atmosphere  in which
 people breathe.

 Abbreviation for coefficient of haze, a unit of
 measurement of visibility interference.

 The percentage of a specified substance re-
 tained by a  gas-cleaning  or  gas-sampling de-
 vice.

 A device for removing and retaining contami-
 nants  from air or other gases. Usually this
 term is applied to cleaning devices in exhaust
 systems.

 The reaction of carbon-containing substances
 (or  other  oxygen-demanding materials) with
 oxygen,  producing a  rapid  temperature in-
 crease in a flame.

 The mass per unit volume of a substance.

 A  process of  spontaneous intermixing  of
 different substances, attributable to molecular
 motion, that tends to produce uniformity of
 concentration.

 The most general term for a system consisting
 of particulate matter suspended in air or other
 gases.

 Daily,  especially pertaining  to actions  or
 events that are completed within 24 hours and
 that recur every 24 hours.

 A  term  loosely  applied  to solid  particles
 predominantly  larger than colloidal and  cap-
 able of temporary suspension in air or other
 gases.

 The amount of  large  particulate matter de-
 posited per month per square mile of land.

 An  engineering  term for "dust concentra-
GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
 21. Droplet




 22. Efficiency


 23. Emissions


 24. Emission Inventory



 25. Emission Mixture


 26. Environment



 27. Episode




 28. Fly Ash




 29.  Fog




 30.  Fume
 tion,"  usually  applied  to the  contents  of
 collection   ducts  and the  emissions from
 stacks.

 A small liquid particle of such size and density
 as  to  fall  under still  conditions, but which
 may remain suspended under turbulent condi-
 tions.

 The ratio of attained performance to absolute
 performance, commonly expressed in percent.

 The total  substances discharged into  the air
from a stack, vent, or other source.

 A list of primary air pollutants emitted into a
 given community's  atmosphere, in amounts
 (commonly tons) per day, by type  of source.

The total  mixture  in  the atmosphere  of
emissions from all sources.

The aggregate of all external conditions and
influences  affecting  the life,  development,
and, ultimately, the  survival of an  organism.

The occurrence  of stagnant air masses  during
which air pollutants accumulate, so that the
population is exposed to an elevated concen-
tration of airborne contaminants.

The finely divided particles of ash entrained in
 flue gases,  arising from  the combustion  of
fuel. The particles of ash may contain incom-
pletely burned fuel.

Visible aerosols  in which the dispersed phase
is liquid. In meteorology, a visible aggregate  of
minute  water droplets  suspended in  the air
near the earth's surface.

Properly, the  solid particles  generated  by
condensation from the gaseous state, generally
after  volatilization  from  melted substances
and often accompanied by a chemical reaction
such as oxidation. Fumes flocculate  and some-
 times coalesce. Popularly, the term  is used  in
reference to any or all types of contaminants
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms
                                        39

-------
31. Gas
32. Grab Sample
33. Impaction


34. Impinger


35. Inversion


36. Isokinetic
37. Mass Concentration
38. Mist
39. Month



40. Odor


41. Odor Unit

42. Odorant
 and, in many laws or regulations,  with the
 added  qualifications  that  the contaminant
 have some unwanted action.

 One of  the  three  states of aggregation  of
 matter, having neither independent shape nor
 volume,  and  tending to  expand indefinitely.

 A sample of an atmosphere obtained in a very
 short period of time, such that the sampling
 time is insignificant in comparison with the
 duration of the operation or the period being
 studied.

 A forcible contact of particles (often  used
 synonymously with impingement).

 Broadly, a sampling instrument using impinge-
 ment for the collection of participate matter.

 A layer of air  in which temperature increases
 with height.

 A term describing a condition of sampling, in
 which  the flow  of gas  into  the  sampling
 device, at the opening or  face of the inlet, has
 the   same flow rate  and  direction  as  the
 ambient atmosphere being sampled.

 Concentration expressed in terms of substance
 per  unit volume of gas or liquid.

 A term loosely applied to dispersions of liquid
 droplets, the  dispersion being of low concen-
 tration  and the  particles  of large  size.  In
 meteorology,  a light dispersion of water drop-
 lets of sufficient size to be falling.

 For  reporting  analyses of  ambient  air on  a
 monthly basis, rate results are calculated to a
 base of 30 days.

 That property of a substance that affects the
 sense of smell.

 Unit volume of air at the odor threshold.

 Odorous substance.
40
GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
 43. Opacity Rating
 44. Oxidants




 45. Particle

 46. Particle Concentrations
 47. Particle Size
 48. Precipitation,
      Meteorological
 49.  Precision
 50.  Pollutant
51. Receptor
52. Ringelmann Chart
 A measurement  of the opacity of emissions,
 defined as the  apparent  obscuration  of an
 observer's vision to a degree  equal  to the
 apparent obscuration of  smoke  of a  given
 rating on the Ringelmann Chart.

 A measure of the presence  of organic oxi-
 dizing  chemicals,   such  as  ozone, in the
 ambient air. An indicator  of photochemical
 smog.

 A small discrete mass of solid or  liquid matter.

 Concentration  expressed in terms of number
 of particles per  unit volume  of air or other
 gas. Note: In  expressing particle concentra-
 tions, the method of determining the concen-
 tration should be stated.

 The size of liquid or solid particles expressed
 as the average or equivalent diameter.

 The precipitation  of water from  the at-
 mosphere in the form of hail, mist, rain, sleet,
 and snow. Deposits of dew, fog, and frost are
 excluded.

 The degree of agreement of reported measure-
 ments of the same property. Expressed in terms
 of dispersion of test results about the mean re-
 sult, obtained by repetitive testing of a homo-
 genous sample under specified conditions.

Any  matter that,  upon  discharge  to  the
ambient  air, creates or  tends  to  create  a
harmful effect  upon  man,  his property, con-
venience  or  happiness,  or that  causes the
contamination in  ambient air to exceed legally
estabh'shed limits,  or that is  defined  as  a
pollutant by a regulatory agency.

Any person or piece  of property upon which
an air pollutant creates an effect.

Actually a series  of charts, numbered from  0
to 5; that simulates various smoke densities by
presenting  different percentages of black. A
Ringelmann No. 1 is equivalent to 20 percent
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms
                                                                      41

-------
53. Sampling
54. Smog
55. Smoke
56. Soot




57. Synergjsm




58. Tape Sampler




59. Thermal Turbulence


60. Topography
 black; a Ringelmann No. 5, 100 percent. Used
 for measuring the opacity of smoke arising
 from stacks and other  sources by matching
 with  the actual effluent the various numbers,
 or densities, indicated by  the  charts. Ringel-
 mann numbers are sometimes used in setting
 emission standards.

 A process consisting of  the  withdrawal  or
 isolation of a fractional  part of a whole. In air
 analysis, the separation of a  portion  of an
 ambient  atmosphere,  with or  without simul-
 taneous isolation of selected components.

 A combination  of "smoke" and "fog." Ap-
 plied to extensive atmospheric contamination
 by  aerosols arising  partly through natural
 processes  and  partly  from human activities.
 Often used loosely for any contamination of
 the air.

 Small gas-borne particles produced by incom-
 plete combustion, consisting  predominantly
 of carbon and other combustible material, and
 present in sufficient quantity to be detectable
 in the presence of other solids.

 Agglomerations of particles or  carbon impreg-
 nated  with "tar" that are  formed in the
 incomplete combustion  of carbonaceous ma-
 terial.

 The cooperative  action of  separate substances
 such that the total  effect  is greater than the
 sum of the effects of the substances acting
 independently.

 A device used in the measurement  of both
 gases   and  fine  particulates.  It  allows  air
 sampling to be done automatically at prede-
 termined times.

 Air movement and mixing caused by convec-
 tion.

 The  configuration of  a  surface, including its
 relief  and  the position of its  natural and
 man-made features.
42
GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
61. Vapor                     The gaseous phase  of matter that normally
                               exists in a liquid or solid state.

62. Volume Concentration      Concentration  expressed in terms of gaseous
                               volume of substance per unit volume of air or
                               other  gas,  usually  expressed  in  percent or
                               parts per million.

63. Week                      For reporting  analysis  of ambient air on a
                               weekly basis, results are calculated to a base
                               of seven consecutive 24-hour days.

64. Year                      For reporting  analysis  of ambient air on a
                               yearly basis, results  are calculated to a base of
                               twelve 30-day months.
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms                                         43

-------
     APPENDIX B.






AIR QUALITY CRITERIA
          45

-------
                                    Table B-1. AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR PARTICULATE MATTER8
Concentration,
ng/m3
100
100
1 50-350
100-135

>130

>300
800-1 000
Measurement
methods
Short-term average
high-volume sampling
High-volume sampling
Smoke stain calibra-
bration or long-term
average high-volume
sampling
Long-term average
high-volume sampling

Long-term average
smoke stain cali-
bration

Smoke stain calibra-
tion 24-hr average
Smoke stain calibra-
ration
24-hr average
Effects
Visibility restriction to < 7.5 miles
Damage to materials
Impairment in lung function or
increase in sputum volume of
exposed populations
Increased probability of chronic
respiratory disease mortality
when economic status has been
corrected for

Increased frequency and severity
of lower respiratory tract disease
in children followed from birth
to 1 5 years
Acute worsening of symptoms in
bronchitic patients
Probability of increase in acute
illness and death from respiratory
and cardiac conditions, especially
in persons with chronic cardio-
pulmonary diseases
Conditions
Particle sizes in the range of
0.2-1 .Op and R.H. <70%
Long-term exposure
In the presence of
1 23-300 Mg/m3 sulfur
oxides
Upper temperate latitudes in
presence of increased sulfation.
Three ranges are given and the
concentrations cited are the lower
bounds of the two upper ranges
In the presence of concentrations
of sulfur oxides above 130 ng/m3

Upper temperate latitudes in
presence of more than 630 jug/m3
sulfur oxides
In presence of 750-8,000 /ug/m3
sulfur oxides
Reference
Charlson et al.
Noll etal.
Larrabee et al.
Copson
Holland etal.
Toyama et al.
Lunn et al.
Fletcher etal.
Winkelstein

Douglas et al.

Lawther
Martin et al.
Martin
Lawther
Greenburgetal.
Watanabe
 o

 S
 o
 w
 •*]
 o
 90
 n
 o

 H

 §

 O
 •n
 >
 53

 3
i
aThe studies referenced here are discussed in  National  Air Pollution Control Administration Publication No. AP-49, Air Quality Criteria for

 Paniculate Matter.

-------
                                         Table B-2.  AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR SULFUR OXIDES
Effect
Visibility impairment
Corrosion
Vegetation damage (alfalfa
mostly, but many other
species are similarly
sensitive)
Odor threshold
Respiratory "symptoms
Respiratory symptoms
Respiratory symptoms
Respiratory symptoms
Respiratory symptoms,
plus impairment of lung
function in children
SC>2 exposure, ppm

0.03 to 0.1 2
0.3
0.47 ppm. 50% of
subjects detect
0.2
>0.05
0.2
0.9
>0.05
Duration

Annual average
8hr
<1 hr
Daily average
Long-term
average
Daily average
Hourly average
Monthly average
Comment
Theoretical work is suggestive, but adequate
measurements of sulfuric acid and sulfate
particles have not been made
Moist temperate climate with
paniculate pollution
Laboratory experiment; other environmental
factors optimal. Field studies are consistent
but dose is difficult to estimate
May be higher for many persons or when
other methods are used
Community exposure exceeding 0.2 ppm
more than 3% of the time
With particulates >100jug/m3
With particulates
With particulates
With particulates
Reference

Upham (1967)
Thomas (1937)
Katz 8t Mac-
Callum (1952)
Manufacturing
Chem. Assn.
(1968)
Bell (1962)
Holland-Stone
(1965), Deane-
Goldsmith-Tuma
(1965)
McCarroll (1966)
Cassell (1965)
Toyama (1964)
o
a
         aThe studies referenced here are discussed in National Air Pollution Control Administration Publication No. AP-50, Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur

          Oxides.

-------
                                      Table B-3.  AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
Concentration
and method
More than 10-12 ppm
NDIR

About 1 0 ppm
NDIR


More than 8 ppm
NDIR



Mean of 50 ppm
MSA Colorimetric


30 ppm
NDIR


50 ppm
NDI




100-300 ml
Injection of pure
gas into air-
stream
Duration of
averaging
4-5 hr


24 hr



Weekly
average



8hr



8-1 2 hr



90 min





10-15 min



Effect
Increased COHb
0.5-2%.

Possibly increased risk
of auto accidents


Possibly increased case
fatality rate in
hospitalized myo-
cardial infarction
patients
Increased hematocrit.
COHb mean of 3.8% in
smokers and 3.4%
in nonsmokers
Equilibrium value of
5% COHb reached


Threshold for the im-
pairment in time
discrimination. Un-
published data show this
effect with substantially shorter
exposures
Impairment of visual
function detectable
at 4-5% COHb

Comments
Traffic police in Paris and Detroit and
students in Los Angeles. May be over-
whelmed by smoking exposure.
Epidemiological association. Smoking or
alcohol use might contribute or the
association might be spurious. Being
studied in Los Angeles 1963-1968.
Higher case fatality in L.A. area with
higher pollution during the quartile
of weeks with highest CO levels. 1958
data need to be confirmed with later
data. Other factors may be involved.
All occupational exposure data do not
show an effect on hematocrit.


Experimental exposure of nonsmokers.



COHb levels not available, but expected
values about 2%. Certain psycho-
motor test results were impaired at
2% COHb.


Data given for very small number of
subjects.


Reference
Chovin et al.
Clayton et al.

Chovin et al.
Clayton et al.


Cohen et al.




Hofreuter



Smith
State of California,
Department of
Public Health
Beard et al.
Schulte




Halperin et al.



n
o

H
O
i
       aThe studies referenced here are discussed in National Air Pollution Control Administration Publication No. AP-62, Air Quality Criteria for Carbon

        Monoxide.

-------
                               Table B-4. AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR OZONE BASED ON HEALTH EFFECTS*
Effect
Odor detection
Respiratory irritation (nose
and throat), chest con-
striction
Changes in pulmonary functions:
Diminished FEV-| g after
8 weeks
Small decrements in VC, FRC,
and DLCQ in, respectively,
3, 2, and 1 out of 7
subjects
Impaired diffusion
capacity (DLco'
Increased airway
resistance
Reduced VC, severe cough,
inability to concentrate
Acute pulmonary edema
Exposure, ppm
0.02
0.3
0.5
0.2-0.3
0.6-0.8
0.1-1.0
2.0
9.0
Duration
5 min
Continuous during
working hours
(8hr)
3 hr/day
6 days/week for
12 weeks
Continuous during
working hours
2hr
1 hr
2hr
Unknown
Comment
Odor detected in 9/10 subjects within 5 min
Occupational exposure of welders (other
pollutants probably also present).
Experimental exposure. Change returns to
normal 6 weeks after exposure. No
changes observed at 0.2 ppm.
Occupational exposure. All 7 subjects
smoked. Normal values for VC, FRC, and
Dl_co based on predicted value.
Experimental exposure of 11 subjects
Increase in 1/4 at 0.1 ppm and 4/4 at
1.0 ppm.
High temperatures. One subject.
Refers to peak concentration of
occupational exposure. Most of exposure
was to lower level.
Reference
Henschler et al.
Kleinfeld et al.
Bennett
Young et al.
Young et al.
Goldsmith et al.
Griswold et al.
Kleinfeld etal.
t
£•*•
v;
n
          aThe studies referenced  here are discussed in

           Photochemical Oxidants.
National Air  Pollution Control Administration Publication No. AP-63, Air Quality Criteria for

-------
                           Table B-5. AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR OXIDANTS BASED ON HEALTH EFFECTS
                                                                                                               -.a
Effects
Eye irritation
Impairment of pulmonary function
(airway resistance)
Aggravation of respiratory
disease: asthma
Impaired performance of
student athletes
Exposure,
PPm
0.1
Regression
about 0.1
0.1 3b
Regression
about 0.1
Duration
5 min
1 week in room
containing ambient
air
Continuous
1 hr +
Comment
Result of panel response.
Subjects were smokers and nonsmokers.
Most subjects had emphysema.
Patients exposed to ambient air. Value
refers to oxidant level at which
number of attacks increased.
Exposure for 1 hour immediately prior to
race.
Reference
Renzetti and
Gobran
Remmers and
Balchum
Schoettlin and
Landau
Wayne et al.
w
*fl
o
*)
n
o
aThe studies  referenced here are discussed in  National  Air Pollution Control Administration Publication No. AP-63, Air Quality Criteria for

 Photochemical Oxidants.

^Calculated from a measured value of 0.25 ppm (phenolphthalein method), which is equivalent to 0.13 (Kl).
O
r
o
53
r
i

-------
                         APPENDIX  C.

                   HIGH AIR  POLLUTION
         POTENTIAL  ADVISORY PROGRAM
  An air pollution potential message is issued every day at 12:20 p.m., EST,
by the  Weather Service National Meteorological Center (NMC) located at
Suitland, Maryland. The message is disseminated over the Service C Network. It
has two parts: a plain-language narrative and a coded message. The narrative
identifies areas for which an air pollution potential condition is forecast. If no
air pollution potential areas are  likely, the statement is "None Today."  The
narrative may include information added at the forecaster's discretion, such as
a developing situation that does  not yet meet the rigid criteria for  issuance
of an advisory.

   The  coded message provides information on current  and predicted mixing
heights and average wind speed in the mixing layer for all reporting Weather
Service radiosonde stations in the United States. Computations are based upon
data  for 7:00 a.m., EST, which  is the  time of synoptic upper air soundings
everywhere in the world. Since a vast quantity and variety of data must be
processed to produce the coded message, the entire procedure is computerized,
including the punched paper tape for disseminating the message on teletype
circuits.

   The  NMC  forecaster  uses the machine-calculated  data  as a  guide in
determining whether  an air pollution potential  advisory is warranted.  His
decision depends largely upon whether all of the following criteria are met:

   1. The  affected area  must  be  no smaller than an area approximately
      equivalent to a 4-degree  latitude-longitude square (about the size of
      Oklahoma).
   2. No  significant  precipitation or frontal passages  must be observed or
      expected for the next 36 hours or so.
   3. The surface winds at  stations in the area must not average more than 5
      knots and/or no more than three individual hourly wind speeds  are to
      exceed 8 knots during a 24-hour period.
                                  51

-------
   4. The  morning urban mixing height must be <  500 meters (about 1,600
      ft), and the observed average wind speed through this layer must be < 4
      meters/sec (about 9 mph).

   5. The  numerical product of the afternoon mixing height and the forecast
      average wind  speed through this layer must be <  6,000 m2 /sec, and the
      forecast average wind itself must not exceed 4 m/sec.
   6. The  30-hour  forecast of the following afternoon's  mixing height and
      average wind speed must meet the same criteria as in 1. above.

   These criteria may appear to be overly stringent.  Situations in which all
criteria are  satisfied  should  occur infrequently, and many local air pollution
events would not be covered by HAPPA advisories.  This is not unplanned.

   "This conservatism on the part of the APP  forecaster is by design. In simple
   terms, he does not wish  to be accused  of crying Wolf!  The social and
   economic consequences of a  substantial air  pollution episode are  suf-
   ficiently great such  that  the  APP  forecaster would  rather  miss  a  few
   marginal cases than attempt to forecast all possibilities  and cry APP when
   none came  to pass. He would soon be ignored to the eventual detriment of
   the ignorers. Rather he would prefer that his forecasts  came to be trusted
   so that  preventative measures,  reducing smoke production, changing fuel
   types, and generally restricting pollutant production, could be undertaken
   to avoid the possible disastrous consequences of a failure to  act.

   At present, nothing seemingly  can be done about changing the potential;
   however, adequate warning coupled with  firm measures can go a long way
   toward  eliminating the  Air Pollution   in an air pollution  potential
   episode."1
REFERENCE FOR APPENDIX C

1. Stackpole, J. D. The  Air Pollution Potential Forecast Program. Weather
   Bureau Technical Memorandum NMC-43. Suitland, Md. November 1967.
52                          GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
                         APPENDIX  D.


                       TAPE SAMPLER


 D.I PRINCIPLE AND APPLICABILITY

    D.I.I Ambient air is  drawn through  a circular portion of a continuous
 strip of filter paper tape 2 inches wide. Particulate matter impinges on the filter
 tape in a spot 1 inch in diameter. The sampling spot is automatically advanced
 every 2 hours on even-hour increments by a timer and take-up reel mechanism.
 In  the National  Air Surveillance  Network,  the samplers are  operated con-
 tinuously, and the tapes are cut weekly, usually after the 8:00 to 10:00 a.m.
 spot on Monday.

    D.1.2 The spot on the tape is measured in Coh's (from "coefficient of
 haze") per 1,000 linear  feet  of sampled air. Mesaurement is based  on light
 transmission through the spot sample; clean areas in  front of each  spot are used
 as a reference. Such measurement  describes the  quantity of particulate matter
 in the air in terms of soiling properties.



 D.2 RANGE AND SENSITIVITY

    D.2.1 In relatively  clean atmospheres,  the amount of particulate collected
 may be insufficient to  cause any measurable difference between  the reference
 blank and the spot. In  some cases, the spot may give a negative reading. Such
 data are not tabulated. A sampling rate of 15 standard cubic feet per hour and
 a  sampling  time  of  2  hours  per  spot  produce the  greatest amount of
 translatable data.



D.3 INTERFERENCES

    D.3.1 Rain and condensation tend  to  stain  the paper filter tape; the
resulting  darkened  area  bears  no relation  to soiling  characteristics of the
atmosphere,  because the  moisture apparently washes out the sampling tube.
                                  53

-------
Care therefore must be taken  to keep the inlet funnel upside down and the
sampling tube as short as possible.
D.4 PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND STABILITY

    D.4.1 Accuracy of airflow measurement is important. Flow through the
filter tape should be set at 15 standard cubic feet per hour. The flow must then
be maintained at 15 and  should be checked twice daily. Each instrument must
be individually calibrated on  site  with an accurate wet-test meter. Thickness
and optical density of the paper tape should be uniform.
D.5 APPARATUS

    D.5.1  Sampling

    D.5.1.1  Tape Sampler—The instrument consists  of a rotary vane vacuum
pump, whose flow is measured by a push-to-test flowmeter (range 0 to 30) and
is adjusted by a needle valve; an automatic timer set for 2-hour intervals; and
an electric take-up motor with necessary electromechanics to change sampling
spots automatically.

    D.5.1.2  Filter Paper  Roll-Whatman  No. 4 filter paper or equivalent, 2
inches wide, indexed with 1/8-inch holes every 2 inches.
    D.5.2  Analysis

   D.5.2.1  Optical Density Measuring Instrument—Capable of measuring the
optical density of light transmitted through the tape.

   D.5.2.2  Automatic Spot  Evaluator (optional)—This instrument is  con-
venient when large amounts of data are collected. It automatically advances the
tape to each spot,  measures light transmission through the spot  and reference
area, digitizes  the reading, and makes it available for automatic data processing
equipment.
D.6  REAGENTS—None required for sampling or analysis.


D.7  PROCEDURE

    D.7.1  Sampling


54                         GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF. AIR POLLUTION

-------
    D.7.1.1  Thread a  new roll  of spot  tape in the supply reel through the
sampling block and attach to the tape take-up reel core. Turn on the sampler,
and  set  the  timer at  zero. Next,  set the flowmeter  to  correspond  with a
calibration curve previously obtained to give 15. Turn off the sampler and wait
until  an  even hour (e.g., 8:00, 10:00, 12:00), then turn on the sampler. The
tape will automatically advance to a clean spot.

    D.7.1.2  Check the flowmeter at least twice daily and adjust, if necessary,
to obtain a true flow of 15.

    D.7.1.3  Cut the tape weekly for optical density measurement. Leave about
a foot of blank tape on each end for ease of processing and protection. When
removing  the tape, mark a beginning and ending date and the  time  on the
appropriate  ends. Mark the  date and time on the edge of the tape each day,
usually when  the airflow  is checked. Do not mark in areas that pass through
the translator light beam and optical cell area; use only the lower 1/4 inch for
marking purposes.  Handle  the tape by the edges, and do  not allow it to pick up
dirt, grease, or moisture.
    D.7.2 Analysis

    D.7.2.1 Install the exposed tape in the optical-density measuring instru-
ment and read as directed by instrument instructions.
D.8 CALIBRATION

    D.8.1  Airflow through the clean filter paper must be maintained at 15. A
wet-test meter may be used if other conditions are standardized. A calibration
curve must be drawn to relate true flow and flowmeter readings in the range of
10 to 20.  Flow rate can vary with differences in filter thickness and particulate
loading.

    D.8.2  The optical density measuring instrument must also be calibrated
with standard optical densities.
D.9 CALCULATIONS

    D.9.1  The  Coh  is  defined as "the  quantity  of light-scattering  solids
deposited  on the standard filter tape that produces an optical density of 0.01
when measured by white-light transmittance (where the blank filter is 0 optical
density).

             _ measured optical density
               optical density per Coh


Tape Sampler                                                         55

-------
       _ . ,   measured optical density
       Coh s =	ool	

   D.9.2 Optical density (OD) is defined as the logarithm to the base 10 of
the reciprocal of the transmittance.

                 I              100	         I0
       OD = log, o Y= log, o % transmittance  ' lo& ° 7

where:

       T = transmittance

         _ intensity of light transmitted through the clean area adjacent to
       ° ~ the spot

       I  = intensity of light transmitted through the spot.

   D.9.3 Data are reported in Coh's per 1,000 linear feet of an air column of
cross-sectional area equal to that of the spot.

                  sampled volume   _ ft
       Lineal feet = area Of sample spot	
      where:   F = sample flow rate, ft3 /min

               t  = sample time, min

               ASp0t  = area of the spot, ft2

      Therefore:

               Coh's per 1,000 lineal ft =

               100 (measured OD of spot—measured OD of blank)
                                      ft
                                 LOOOAgpot

           Coh's	j 10s Aspot (OD of spot-OD of blank)
      01   1,000 lineal ft                    ft


D.10 BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. ASTM Standards, Part 23. Standard Method of Test for Paniculate Matter
   in the Atmosphere, subtitle, Optical Density of Filtered Deposit. Oct. 1967,
   pages 827-834.


56                        GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------
                               APPENDIX E.
       NATIONAL  WEATHER SERVICE  STATIONS

                           IN UNITED  STATES
 ALABAMA
 1.  MOBILE
 2.  HUNTSVILLE
 3.  BIRMINGHAM
 4.  MONTGOMERY
 ARIZONA
 1.  YUMA
 2.  PHOENIX
 3.  FLAGSTAFF
 4.  WINSLOW
 5.  TUCSON
 ARKANSAS
 1.  FORT SMITH
 2.  LITTLE ROCK
 3.  TEXARKANA
 CALIFORNIA
 1.  EUREKA
 2.  OAKLAND
 3.  SAN FRANCISCO
 4.  SANTA MARIA
 5.  BURBANK
 6.  LOS ANGELES
 7.  LONG BEACH
 8.  SAN DIEGO
 9.  MOUNT SHASTA
10.  RED BLUFF
II.  SACRAMENTO
12.  STOCKTON
13.  FRESNO
14.  BAKERSFIELD
15.  POMONA
 COLORADO
 1.  GRAND JUNCTION
 2.  ALAMOSA
 3.  DENVER
 4.  COLORADO SPRINGS
 5.  PUEBLO
 CONNECTICUT
 t.  BRIDGEPORT
 2,  NEW HAVEN
 3.  HARTFORD
 DELAWARE
 1.  WILMINGTON
 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
 FLORIDA
 1.  PENSACOLA
 2.  APALACHICOLA
 3.  TALLAHASSEE
 4.  JACKSONVILLE
 5.  ORLANDO
 6.  DAYTONA BEACH
 7.  TAMPA
 8.  LAKELAND
 9.  FORT MYERS
10.  PALM BEACH
11.  MIAMI
12.  KEY WEST
 GEORGIA
 1.  COLUMBUS
 2.  ATLANTA
 3.  MACON
 4.  ATHENS
 5.  AUGUSTA
 6.  SAVANNAH
 IDAHO
 1.  LEWISTON
 2.  BOISE
 3.  POCATELLO
 ILLINOIS
 1.  MOLINE
 2.  ROCKFORD
 3.  CHICAGO
 4.  PEORIA
 5.  SPRINGFIELD
 6.  CAIRO
 INDIANA
 1.  EVANSVILLE
 2.  SOUTH BEND
 3.  INDIANAPOLIS
 4.  FORT WAYNE
 IOWA
 1.  SIOUX CITY
 2.  DES MOINES
 3.  WATERLOO
 4.  DUBUQUE
 KANSAS
 1.  GOODLAND
 2.  DODGE CITY
 3.  CONCORDIA
 4.  WICHITA
 5.  TOPEKA
 KENTUCKY
 t.  LOUISVILLE
 2.  LEXINGTON
 LOUISIANA
 1.  SHREVEPORT
 2.  ALEXANDRIA
 3.  LAKE CHARLES
 4.  BATON ROUGE
 5.  NEW ORLEANS
 MAINE
 1.  CARIBOU
 2.  PORTLAND
 MASSACHUSETTS
 1.  WORCESTER
 2.  BOSTON
 3.  NANTUCKET
 MARYLAND
 1.  FREDERICK
 2.  BALTIMORE
 MICHIGAN
 1.  MARQUETTE
 2.  ESCANABA
 3.  SAULT STE. MARIE
 4.  ALPENA
 5.  HOUGHTON  LAKE
 6.  MUSKEGON
 7.  GRAND RAPIDS
 8.  LANSING
 9.  FLINT
10.  DETROIT
 MINNESOTA
 1.  INTERNATIONAL FALLS
 2.  DULUTH
 3.  ST. CLOUD
 4.  MINNEAPOLIS
 5.  ROCHESTER
 MISSISSIPPI
 1.  VICKSBURG
 2.  JACKSON
 3.  MERIDIAN
 MISSOURI
 1.  KANSAS CITY
 2.  SPRINGFIELD
 3.  COLUMBIA
 4.  ST. LOUIS
 MONTANA
 1.  KALISPELL
 2.  MISSOULA
 3.  HELENA
 4.  GREAT FALLS
 5.  HAVRE
 6.  BILLINGS
 7.  GLASGOW

                 57
NEBRASKA
1. SCOTTS BLUFF
2. VALENTINE
3. NORTH PLATTE
4. GRAND ISLAND
5. NORFOLK
6. LINCOLN
7. OMAHA
NEVADA
1. RENO
2. WINNEMUCCA
3. ELKO
4. ELY
5. LAS VEGAS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
1. CONCORD
NEW JERSEY
1. TRENTON
2. NEWARK
3. ATLANTIC CITY
NEW MEXICO
t. SILVER CITY
2. ALBUQUERQUE
3. ROSWELL
NEW YORK
1. BUFFALO
2. ROCHESTER
3. SYRACUSE
4. ALBANY
5. BINGHAMTON
6. NEW YORK CITY
NORTH CAROLINA
1. ASHEVILLE
2. CHARLOTTE
3. WINSTON -SALEM
4. GREENSBORO
5. RALEIGH
6. WILMINGTON
7. CAPE HATTERAS
NORTH DAKOTA
1. WILLISTON
2. BISMARCK
3. FARGO
OHIO
1. CINCINNATI
2. DAYTON
3. TOLEDO
4. COLUMBUS
5. MANSFIELD
6. CLEVELAND
7.- AKRON -CANTON
8. YOUNGSTOWN
OKLAHOMA
1. OKLAHOMA CITY
2. TULSA
OREGON
1. ASTORIA
2. SALEM
3. EUGENE
4. MEDFORD
5. PORTLAND
6. PENDLETON
PENNSYLVANIA
t. ERIE
2. PITTSBURGH
3. WILLIAMSPORT
4. READING
5. HARRISBURG
6. SCRANTON
7. ALLENTOWN
8. PHILADELPHIA

RHODE ISLAND
1. PROVIDENCE
SOUTH CAROLINA
1. GREENVILLE-
SPARTANBURG
2. COLUMBIA
3. CHARLESTON
SOUTH DAKOTA
1. RAPID CITY
2. ABERDEEN
3. HURON
4. SIOUX FALLS
TENNESSEE
1. MEMPHIS
2. NASHVILLE
3. CHATTANOOGA
4. KNOXVILLE
5. BRISTOL
TEXAS
1. EL PASO
2. AMARILLO
3. LUBBOCK
4. MIDLAND
5. DEL RIO
6. LAREDO
7. ABILENE
8. SAN ANGELO
9. WICHITA FALLS
10. FT. WORTH
11. DALLAS
12. WACO
13. SAN ANTONIO
14. AUSTIN
15. VICTORIA
T6. CORPUS CHRISTI
17. BROWNSVILLE
18. HOUSTON
T9. PORT ARTHUR
20. GALVESTON
UTAH
1. WENDOVER
2. SALT LAKE CITY
VERMONT
1. BURLINGTON
VIRGINIA
1. ROANOKE
2. LYNCHBURG
3. RICHMOND
4. NORFOLK
WASHINGTON
1. SEATTLE
2. OLYMPIA
3. WENATCHEE
4. YAKIMA
5. SPOKANE
6. WALLA WALLA
WEST VIRGINIA
1. HUNTINGTON
2. PARKERSBURG
3. CHARLESTON
4. BECKLEY
5. ELKINS
WISCONSIN
1. LA CROSSE
2. MADISON
3. GREEN BAY
4. MILWAUKEE
WYOMING
1. LANDER
2. SHERIDAN
3. CASPER
4. CHEYENNE

-------
00
 
  •fl
  o

  r
  i
                   •«•  /"*•»/  V\i
                                                                                                   u
                               Figure E
-1. National Weather Service Stations  in United States.

-------
                        APPENDIX F.


                EXAMPLE PROBLEMS IN

                DIFFUSION ESTIMATION

   The solutions to the problems listed below refer to tables and figures found
in Bruce Turner's Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, available
from the  Environmental Protection Agency's Air Pollution Control Office as
PHS Publication No. 999-AP-26 (revised 1969).

PROBLEM 1. A  power plant burns  10 tons per hour of coal containing 3%
sulfur; the effluent is  released from a single stack with effective height of
emission of 150 meters. On a sunny afternoon, with the wind at 4 m/sec, what
is the distance to the maximum  ground-level concentration, and what is the
concentration at that point?

SOL UTION:  To  determine the source strength, the amount of sulfur burned
is: 10 tons/hi x  2,000 Ib/ton x 0.03 sulfur = 600 Ib sulfur/hr. Sulfur has a
molecular weight  of 32 and combines with 02 with a molecular weight of 32;
therefore, for every mass unit of sulfur burned, there result two mass units of
S02.

      n _  2x(6001b/hrx453.6g/lb)
      Q --    3600sec/hr        =  151 ^ S0>

Turn to Figure 3-9 on p. 29 of the Workbook, For a sunny afternoon, consider
stability to be in  Class B. Using the curve marked B, at effective height of 150
meters, read  the Y-coordinate as 1 km for the downwind distance to the point
of maximum concentration. Read the X-coordinate as 7.5 x 10~6  for maximum
XU/Q, which  is the "normalized" concentration. Multiply the last figure by Q/u
to get
             _  Xu Q  _ 7.5xlCT6 xlSl _
       Xmax  - QmaxU - - 4

             = 2800 /-ig/m3  = 0.098 ppmNPT
                                 59

-------
PROBLEM 2:  For the power plant in Problem 1, at what distance does the
maximum ground-level concentration occur,  and  what is this concentration
under nighttime or heavy overcast conditions?


SOLUTION: Use D stability curve. From Figure 3-9, D stability, at H of 150
m,  distance to the point of maximum ground level concentration is 5.6 km,
and the maximum normalized concentration is 3 .0 x 1 0~6 .

  Xmax = 3-0xl°46x151 = 1.1 x  1(T4 g/m3 = 1 10 Mg/m3 = 0.0375 ppm NPT
PROBLEM 3.  Under conditions of Problem 1 , what concentration would be
measured at a point 1 .5 km downwind, and 200 m off to the side of the plume
direction?

SOLUTION: Turn to Figure 3-5B. Refer to 1.5 km along the abscissa, follow
the line up the chart to where it intersects the curve for H =  150, then read
across  to the  left, 6.0 x  10"6 for normalized concentration. However,  this
applies to the center line of the plume.

    Now turn to Figure 3-2. At downwind distance  of  1.5 km, follow the  line
up the chart to where it intersects the curve for B, and read to the left a value
for 0y of 225 m. This is the  standard deviation of the  lateral spread of the
plume  concentration. Our  point of interest is 200/225 of the distance of the
standard deviation, or  0.889.  Turn to Table  A-l, on  page 66, and read for
0.889 a value of 6.73 x 10"1 . This is the factor to be applied to the centerline
concentration. Hence,
       (xu/Q)x,y = 6.0 x 10~6 x 0.673 = 4.038 x 10"'
                 4.038 xlO'6 xlSl   ,„_   ,_
           Xx,y =	Z	~ 152.5 x 10

                = 152.5 jug/m3 = 0.053 ppm NPT
60                         GUIDE FOR CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

-------