MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE*
MRI
EPORT
STATIONARY SOURCE TESTING OF A MISSOURI-TYPE
CHARCOAL KILN
DRAFT
DRAFT REPORT
April 8, 1976
Midwest Research Institute
EPA Contract No. 68-02-1403
MRI Project No. 3927-C(14)
For
Region VII
Environmental Protection Agency
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
Attn: Mr. Charles W. Whitmorc
425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110 • 816561-0202
-------
MRI-NORTH STAR DIVISION 3100 38th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406* 612 721-6373
MRI WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005- 1522 K STREET, N.W. • 202 293-3800
-------
STATIONARY SOURCE TESTING OF A MISSOURI-TYPE
CHARCOAL KILN
by
William H. Maxwell
DRAFT REPORT
April 8, 1976
Midwest Research Institute
EPA Contract No. 68-02-1403
MRI Project No. 3927-CC14)
For
Region VII
Environmental Protection Agency
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
Attn: Mr. Charles W. Whitmore
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110 • 816561-0202
-------
PREFACE
The work reported herein was conducted by Midwest Research
Institute (MRI) under Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Contract
No. 68-02-1403, Task No. 14.
The project was under the technical supervision of Mr. Paul
C. Constant, Jr., Head, Environmental Measurements Section of the Phys-
ical Sciences Division. Mr. William Maxwell served as project chief and
was assisted by Mr. Bruce DaRos. The analysis of the samples was done
by Dr. Clarence Haile, Ms. Carol Green, and Ms. Mary Woodfin under the
technical supervision of Dr. Mark Marcus. Mr. Thomas Merrifield was re-
sponsible for the data reduction and computer analysis. Some sample
analysis was done by Kansas City Testing Laboratories under the direc-
tion of Mr. A. G. Cloud, Chief Chemist.
Approved for:
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
^L/^7 Tfl
—rrr^yv/
'.Paul C. Constant, Jr.
Program Manager
Av\-4Uvv^_
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction• . ..... 1
II. Summary and Discussion of Results 2
A. Mass and Total Organics. 2
B. Polycyclic Organic Materials . . 10
C. Visible Emissions • 14
D. Heat of Combustion 14
III. Process Description and Operation ..... 16
A. Process Description 16
B. Process Operation 19
IV. Sampling and Analytical Procedures. .... 21
A. Sampling 21
B. Analysis 39
V. Recommendations and Comments. 42
References 44
Appendix A - Results of Analysis - Computer Computations (Total
Particulate) 45
Appendix B - Sample Calculations 71
Appendix C - Results of Analysis - Computer Computations (Total
Organic) 78
Appendix D - Results of Analysis - Computer Computations (Poly-
cyclic Organic Materials) 105
Appendix E - Flue Gas Combustion Computations 147
Appendix F - Computation of Kiln Volume 157
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Concluded)
Appendix G - Preliminary Runs - Field Data 162
Appendix H - Computation for Isokinetic Sampling 173
Appendix I - Table of Metric Equivalents 176
List of Tables
Table Title Page
1 Summary of Particulate Results 3
2 Summary of Organic Results 5
3 Summary of Mass and Organic Data . . 6
4 Summary of Mass Emission Factors (Charcoal Production). 8
5 Summary of Mass Emission Factors (Wood Utilization) . . 9
6 Summary of ORSAT Results • • • 11
7 Summary of Polycyclic Organic Material Results 12
8 Heats of Combustion 15
A-l Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 1 46
A-2 Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 3 47
A-3 Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 5 49
A-4 Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 7 51
A-5 Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 9 53
A-6 Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 11 55
IV
-------
List of Tables (Continued)
Table Title
A-7 Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 13 57
A-8 Particulate Data and Calculated Values, Run 14 58
A-9 Particulate Emission Data • 59
A-10 Particulate Emission Data (Metric Results). ...... 62
A-ll Summary of Results (Particulate). 65
A-12 Summary of Results—Metric Units (Particulate) 68
C-l Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 1 79
C-2 Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 3 . 80
C-3 Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 5 83
C-4 Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 7 ....... 85
C-5 Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 9....... 87
C-6 Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 11 89
C-7 Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 13 91
C-8 Organic Data and Calculated Values, Run 14 92
C-9 Organic Emission Data 93
C-10 Organic Emission Data (Metric Results) 96
C-ll Summary of Results (Organic). ....... 99
C-12 Summary of Results—Metric Units (Organic) 102
D-l Benzfclphenanthrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 2 . 106
D-2 Benz[V]phenanthrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 4 • 107
-------
List of Tables (Continued)
Table Title
D-3 Benz[cjphenanthrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 6 . 108
D-4 Benz[£]phenanthrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 8 • 109
D-5 BenzfVjphenanthrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 10. 110
D-6 Benz[V]phenanthrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 12. Ill
D-7 Benz[£]phenanthrene Emission Data 112
D-8 Benz[^c]phenanthrene Emission Data (Metric Results). . • 114
D-9 Summary of Results (BenzfVjphenanthrene) 116
D-10 Summary of Results—Metric Units (Benz[cT]phenanthrene). 118
D-ll Benz[ja]pyrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 4 .... 120
D-12 Benz[V]pyrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 6 .... 121
D-13 Benz[_a]pyrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 8 .... 122
D-14 Benz[V]pyrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 10. ... 123
D-15 Benz[^a]pyrene Data and Calculated Values, Run 12. ... 124
D-16 Benz[ai]pyrene Emission Data 125
D-17 Benz^ajpyrene Emission Data (Metric Results) 127
D-18 Summary of Results (Benz[ja]pyrene). 129
D-19 Summary of Results—Metric Units (Benz[V]pyrene). . • • 131
D-20 POM-Like Material Data and Calculated Values, Run 2 . . 133
D-21 POM-Like Material Data and Calculated Values, Run 4 . . 134
D-22 POM-Like Material Data and Calculated Values, Run 6 . . 135
D-23 POM-Like Material Data and Calculated Values, Run 8 . . 136
VI
-------
Table
D-24
D-25
D-26
D-27
D-28
D-29
G-l
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-5
G-6
G-7
G-8
Figure
1
2
3
4
List of Tables (Concluded)
Title Page
POM-Like Material Data and Calculated Values, Run 10. . 137
POM-Like Material Data and Calculated Values, Run 12. . 138
POM-Like Material Emission Data 139
POM-Like Material Emission Data (Metric Results). ... 141
Summary of Results (POM-Like Material) 143
Summary of Results—Metric Units (POM-Like Material). . 145
Preliminary Data and Calculated Values, Run 1-P .... 163
Preliminary Data and Calculated Values, Run 2-P .... 164
Preliminary Data and Calculated Values, Run 3-P .... 165
Preliminary Data and Calculated Values, Run 4-P .... 166
Preliminary Data and Calculated Values, Run 5-P .... 167
Preliminary Data and Calculated Values, Run 6-P .... 168
Preliminary Emission Data .......... 169
Preliminary Emission Data (Metric Results). 171
List of Figures
Title
The Missouri-Type Charcoal Kiln . .
Drawings of Sampled Kiln. . . . . .
Schedule of Burn and Testing Cycles
17
20
22
Preliminary Sampling Train A: Runs Nos. 1-P and 2-P. . 25
vii
-------
List of Figures (Concluded)
Figure Title
5 Preliminary Sampling Train B: Run No. 3-P 27
6 Preliminary Sampling Train C: Run No. 4-P 27
7 Preliminary Sampling Train D: Run No. 5-P 33
8 Preliminary Sampling Train E: Run No. 6-P 33
9 Flammability Limits Apparatus ..... 37
10 Cryogenic Sampling Apparatus 38
viii
-------
NOTICE
This document is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally
released by EPA and should not at this stage be construed to represent
Agency policy. It is being circulated for comment on its technical accur-
acy and policy implications.
I. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of source testing performed
during the period December 2 to 9, 1975, by MRI on a Missouri-type char-
coal kiln at the Wulff Charcoal Company, Vienna, Missouri. Testing for
particulate, total organic, and polycyclic organic material (POM) emis-
.sions was conducted on each of the eight uncontrolled stacks of the kiln
during a burn cycle, a continuous process.
The testing was not done for compliance reporting but rather
for research into the general amount and types of emissions present dur-
ing operation of a typical kiln. The data are to be used for the possible
establishment of new source emission standards and for evaluation of po-
tential control techniques for the charcoal industry in Missouri. The
testing was also done as a means of developing and evaluating source sam-
pling methodology for charcoal kilns. The scope of work for this project
specified:
-------
1. At least one sample per day for particulate, total organic,
and POM emissions over the period of a burn cycle.
2. Flammability limits sampling.
3. Visible emission observations.
The following sections of this report present:
1. Summary and discussion of results;
2. Process description and operation;
3. Sampling and analytical procedures; and
4. Recommendations and comments.
II. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
A. Mass and Total Organics
Table 1 presents a summary of the particulate results for the
eight runs. Data are presented as grains per dry standard cubic foot
(gr/dscf), milligrams per normal cubic meter (mg/ncm), pounds per hour
(Ib/hr), and kilograms per hour (kg/hr). Computer printouts of the field
data and reductions may be found in Appendix A. Sample calculations are
found in Appendix B.
The runs are broken down into three sections. Run No. 1 was
completed during the 3-hr kiln start-up period before the doors were
closed and sealed. The resulting values may be considered representative
of emissions found during this period. They should only be considered
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF PARTIGULATE RESULTS
Total particulate loadJL/
Run
No.
1
3
5
7
9
11
14
13
Partial^./
Date
Start-up
December
Burn-cycle
December
December
December
December
December
December
Other
December
gr/dscf£/ mg/ncm£/
2, 1975
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
1.09
0.36
0.76
CT- 95C^1
1.64
2.43
6.29
4.20
2,487
815
1,734
__6,751
3,745
5,553
14,383
9,602
Ib/hrcA
d/
ISO2-7
1.04
2.16
o • / 2
3.43
5.44
9.03
1.57
kg/hr£/
d/
82-
0.46
1.05
__— 3...0.6
1.55
2.46
4.10
0.71
To tali/
gr/dscf£' mg/ncm£/
1.32
0.80
2.21
<1
3.77
5.21
9.21
6.82
3,
1,
5,
39,
8,
11,
21,
15,
022
829
054
824
628
917
074
618
lb/hr£/
d/
219-
2.32
6.24
39.84
7.91
11.68
13.23
2.56
kg/hr£/
d/
99-
0.97
2.83
18.06
3.58
5.29
6.01
1.16
a/ Total for all stacks emitting during test; 8 stacks for Runs Nos. 3, 5, 7, and 11; 7 stacks for
Runs Nos. 9 and 14; 1.67 stacks for Run No. 13; 1 stack (nominal) for Run No. 1; grains per dry
standard cubic foot and milligrams per normal cubic meter are irrespective of number of stacks.
b/ Partial = Front half of sampling train only (probe, cyclone, first filter)
Total = Entire train
£/ gr/dscf = Grains per dry standard cubic foot
tng/ncm = Milligrams per normal cubic meter
Ib/hr = Pounds emissions per hour
kg/hr = Kilograms emissions per hour
d/ Values for Run No. 1 are approximate and based on a nominal 10-ft diameter stack.
-------
approximate due to the sampling method as will be reported later. Runs
Nos. 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 14 are complete daily runs conducted each full
day of the burn cycle. These data indicate the trend of emissions over
the cycle of the burn. Run No. 13 was a partial run covering only one
and two-thirds stacks on 1 day. These data may indicate those emissions
from a lesser number of stacks but were not used in subsequent emission
factor calculations.
Sampling volumes for the six daily runs varied from 16.80 dscf
(2.65 ncm) to 93.53 dscf (0.48 ncm). Values for the percent isokinetic
sampling rate varied from 94.0 to 104.6.
Table 2 presents a summary of the organic results for the eight
runs. These data are based on the ether-chloroform extractable portion
of the particulate samples and are presented in the same form as the par-
ticulate data. Computer printouts of the field data and reductions are
found in Appendix C. The same raw field data and sample calculations as
for the particulate runs apply to the organic runs.
The relationship between the total particulate catch and the
organic fraction is shown in Table 3. The emission rate from the total
mass calculations is compared with that of the organic fractions. The
organic fraction of the total mass emissions is in the range of 66 to
77%.
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC RESULTS
Total organic load£'
Run
No.
1
3
5
7
9
11
14
13
«/
b/
£/
Date
Start-up
December 2, 1975
Burn-cycle
December 3
December 4
December 5
December 6
December 7
December 8
Other
December 8
Total for all stacks
Runs Nos. 9 and 14;
standard cubic foot
Partial = Front half
Total = Entire train
gr/dscf = Grains per
Partial^/
TotalJi/
gr/dscf£/ mg/ncm£/ lb/hr£/ kg/hr£/
0.77 1,755 127-
0.30 593
0.60 1,372
1.26 2,875
1.92 4,390
4.50 10,300
2.70 6,169
emitting during test; 8
1.67 stacks for Run No
0.72
1.68
2.66
4.32
6.44
1.02
stacks
. 13; 1
SB*/
0.34
0.79
1.19
2.71
2.94
0.46
gr/dscf£/ mg/ncn£A
0.89
0.55
1.62
13. 45
2.86
3.54
6.38
4.52
for Runs Nos. 3
stack (nominal)
and milligrams per normal cubic meter
of sampling train only
dry standard cubic foot
(probe,
cyclone,
2,
1,
3,
30,
6,
8,
14,
10,
045
269
718
782
535
105
608
334
,5, 7, and
for Run No.
are irrespective of
first
filter)
lb/hr£/
148^
1
4
30
6
8
9
1
.60
.56
.80
,535
,105
.17
.68
kg/hr£/
67^
0
2
13
1
3
4
0
.73
.08
.95
.94
.59
.17
.77
11; 7 stacks for
1; grains per dry
number of
stacks.
mg/ncm = Milligrams per normal cubic meter
Ib/hr — Pounds emissions per hour
kg/hr = Kilograms emissions per hour
±1
Values for Run No. 1
are approximate and based on a
nominal
10-ft diameter
stack.
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF MASS AND ORGANIC DATA
Run
No.
1
3
5
7
9
11
14
13
£/
b/
Total
Date
Start-up
December
Burn-cycle
December
December
December
December
December
December
Other
December
lb/hrb/
2,
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
Total for all
5, 7, and 11
No. 13; 1
train.
1975 219s-'
2
6
39
7
11
13
2
.32
.24
.84
.91
.68
.23
.56
ma ss ay
Total
organic^/
kg/hrb/ lb/hrb/ kg/hrb/
99£/
0.97
2.83
18.06
3.58
5.29
6.01
1.16
stacks emitting during
; 7 stacks for Runs Nos
stack (nominal)
Ib/hr = Pounds
emissions
per
kg/hr = Kilograms emissions
£/
Values for
Run
No. 1 are
c/ c/
149s-' 67-
1
4
30
5
7
9
1
.60
.56
.80
.95
.92
.17
.68
test; 8
. 9 and
for Run No. 1;
hour
per hour
approximate
0
2
13
1
3
.73
.08
.95
.94
.59
4.17
0
stacks
14; 1.
data is
and based on a
.77
Percent
organic
68
69
73
77
75
68
69
66
for Runs Nos. 3,
67 stacks for Run
for
entire sampling
nominal 10-ft
di-
ameter stack.
-------
Table 4 presents a summary of the mass emission factors (unit
emissions per unit charcoal produced) for each run as well as the total
for the burn cycle. These emission factors have been computed by three
methods. In the first method, the data for each run are taken to repre-
sent that of the 24-hr period encompassing the run time. The data for
the 3-hr start-up period are added to form the total emission factor for
the burn cycle. This method does not include the shut-down period of the
cycle. The second method utilizes the data from each run as representa-
tive of the emissions over a 28-hr period around each sample time. This
method includes the start-up and shut-down periods. The last method takes
the data from each run as being consistent with that of a 27.5-hr period
around each sample time. The data for the start-up period are added to
form the total while the shut-down period is included. These methods
yield total emission factors ranging from 126.4 to 160.5 Ib of emissions
per ton of charcoal produced (63.2 to 80.2 kg of emissions per metric
ton of charcoal produced).
Table 5 presents the same data but figured as unit emissions
per unit wood used in the charcoal production. The data were computed
by the same three methods as that for Table 4. The results range from
26.8 to 34.1 Ib emissions per ton wood utilized (13.4 to 17.0 kg emis-
sions per metric ton wood utilized).
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF MASS EMISSION FACTORS (CHARCOAL PRODUCTION)
00
Run
No.'
IS/
3
5
7
9
11
14
Total
METHOD I3'
METHOD IlJi/
Total mass Total mass
Period emissions Emission factor Period emissions Emission factor
covered lb£f kg£/ lb/tonfi/
n lTTl975 656 298 36'5
December 2, 1975
1540 December 2
1540 December 3 " " 3'1
1540 December 3 ^ 6g fl>3
1540 December 4
1540 December 4
1540 December 5
fstn n^" * 19° 86 10-5
1540 December 6
1540 December 6 28Q
1540 December 7
1540 December 7
1540 December 8 318 144 17'6
147 hr 2,606 1,181 144.7
METHOD IIl£/
Total mass
Period emissions Emission factor
kg/MtonS/ covered lb£/ kg2' Ib/tonS/ kg/Mton£/ covered Ibl/ kgg/ lb/ton£'
IS. 2
1240 December 2
1640 December 3
4.2 "*9 DeCe^er ' 175 79 9.7 4.9
2040 December 4
26 -5 nn?n DCCe°ter « M" 506 62.0 31.0
0040 December 6
5-3 rnDeCeter? "1 10° 12'3 6.1
0440 December 7
0440 December 7
7'8 0840 December 8 327 l48 18'2 9>1
8.8 0840 December 8 2Q
1240 December 9
72.3 168 hr 2,274 1,030 126.4 63.2
656 298 36.5
December 2, 1975
1540 December 2 0
1910 December 3 6* 29 3'5
1910 December 3 UJ ?g ,_5
2240 December 4
2240 December 4
0210 December 6
0210 December 6
0540 December 7
0540 December 7
0910 December 8 321 U5 l7'8
?9ln neCe"ter S 3" l" 20.2
1240 December 9
168 hr 2,891 1,311 160.5
kg/Mtonl/
18.2
1.8
4.8
tCSP
"^gttBmiG
JO^
8.9 KjeaCTBKB
tt^|
80.2
a/ Based on 24-hr periods per run plus 3 hr start-up; excludes shutdown.
b/ Based on 28-hr periods per run including start-up and shutdown periods*
c/ Based on 27.5-hr periods per run plus 3 hr start-up; includes shutdown*
d/ lb = Pounds emissions
kg — Kilograms emissions
Ib/ton = Pounds emissions per ton charcoal produced (based on 18 tons charcoal)
kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton charcoal produced (based on 16.33 Mtons charcoal)
cl Values Cor Run No. I are approximate.
-------
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF MASS EMISSION FACTORS (WOOD UTILIZATION)
METHOD
Tb/
METHOD III-'
VO
Run
No.
*
3
5
7
9
11
14
Total
Period
covered
1240-1540
December 2, 1975
1540 December 2
1540 December 3
1540 December 3
1540 December 4
1540 December 4
1540 December 5
1540 December 5
1540 December 6
1540 December 6
1540 December 7
1540 December 7
1540 December 8
147 hr
Total mass
emissions
Ibl/ ka°/
656 298
56 25
150 68
956 433
190 86
280 127
318 144
2,606 1,181
Emission
lb/ton£' t
7.7
0.7
1.8
11.3
2.2
3.3
3.7
30.7
factor
ig/Htong/
3.9
0.3
0.9
5.6
1.1
1.6
1.9
15.3
Period
covered
1240 December 2
1640 December 3
1640 December 3
2040 December 4
2040 December 4
0040 December 6
0040 December 6
0440 December 7
0440 December 7
0840 December 8
0840 December 8
1240 December 9
168 hr
Total mass
emissions Emission factor
~"°" ~&S~ °"~ "^
65 29 0.8 0.4
175 79 2.1 1.0
1,116 506 13.1 6.6
221 100 2.6 1.3
327 148 3.8 1.9
370 168 4.4 2.2
2,274 1,030 26.8 13.4
Period
covered
1240-1540
December 2, 1975
1540 December 2
1910 December 3
1910 December 3
2240 December 4
2240 December 4
0210 December 6
0210 December 6
0540 December 7
0540 December 7
0910 December 8
0910 December 8
1240 December 9
168 hr
Total mass
emissions
Ibi'
656
64
172
1,096
218
321
364
2,891
298
29
78
497
99
145
165
1,311
Emission
Ib/toni' I
7.7
0.8
2.0
12.9
2.6
3.8
4.3
34.1
factor
cg/Mtoi^d/
3.9
0.4
^
6.4 ||l|™
K3
U9 sagg
2.1 «HaBi
17.0
a/ Based on 24-hr periods per run plus 3 hr start-up; excludes shutdown.
b/ Based on 28-hr periods per run including start-up and shutdown periods*
£/ Based on 27.5-hr periods per run plus 3 hr start-up; includes shutdown.
d/ Ib = Pounds emissions
kg = Kilograms emissions
Ib/ton = Pounds emissions per ton wood utilized (based on 84.96 tons wood)
kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton wood utilized (based on 77.07 Mtons wood)
el Values for Run No. I are approximate.
-------
Table 6 presents a summary of the ORSAT results for the stack
gas compositions. Values for the percent by volume of carbon monoxide
and carbon dioxide generally increased over the period of the burn while
that for oxygen generally decreased. These values may be in error some-
what due to the presence of volatile hydrocarbons in the gas stream, but
are thought to be representative.
Percent moisture values ranged from 25.5 to 35% (by volume) for
the six daily runs. These values are at or slightly below moisture satu-
ration. The value for the volume of water collected was back-calculated
using the standard equation for those runs at moisture saturation (these
values were needed for entry with the computer program). The value for
Ap at each point found in the computer printouts was back-calculated from
the input velocity data, since no direct Ap readings were obtained by
pitot readings due to the low flow. These values are shown merely to in-
dicate approximate readings that would be expected.
B. Polycyclic Organic Materials
Table 7 presents a summary of the POM results for the six runs.
Data are presented as for the mass and total organics. Computer printouts
of the field data and reductions may be found in Appendix D. The sample
calculations are the same as for the mass data.
10
-------
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF ORSAT RESULTS
Date
December 3, 1975
December 4, 1975
December 5, 1975
December 6, 1975
December 7, 1975
December 8, 1975
Percent by volume
Stack
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
14)
7
3
5
(Runs
5
8
(Runs
6
2
8
(Runs
7
7
(Runs
4
8
6
(Runs
8
1
(Runs
Time
1000
1255
1530
Nos. 1, 2, 3)
0900
1230
Nos. 4, 5)
0830
1200
1400
Nos. 6, 7)
0900
1030
Nos. 8, 9)
0940
1130
1300
Nos. 10, 11)
0900
1300
Nos. 12, 13,
C02
9.80
8.67
14.40
10.96
17.00
13.00
15.00
12.67
12.27
26.73
17.22
14.60
17.53
16.07
22.17
21.00
11.40
18.19
22.67
22.00
22.33
02
10
11
5
9
6
7
7
8
11
7
9
7
4
6
2
2
10
5
0
1
1
.67
.53
.33
.17
.87
.73
.30
.53
.73
.40
.22
.93
.87
.40
.37
.40
.60
.12
.87
.40
.13
CO
1
1
2
1
4
1
2
2
2
7
4
1
1
1
7
6
3
5
8
5
6
.73
.73
.20
.88
.00
.87
.93
.53
.60
.27
.13
.33
.67
.50
.07
.40
.00
.49
.20
.13
.67
Molecular weight
dry stack gas
N2
77
78
78
77
72
77
74
76
73
58
69
76
75
76
68
70
75
71
68
71
69
.80
.07
.07
.98
.13
.40
.77
.27
.40
.60
.42
.13
.93
.03
.40
.20
.00
.20
.27
.47
.87
(Ib/lb-mole)
29
29
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
32
31
30
31
30
31
31
30
31
31
31
31
.99
.85
.52
.12
.99
.39
.69
.37
.43
.57
.12
.65
.00
83
.64
.46
.25
.12
.66
.58
.62
-------
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF POLYCYCLIC ORGANIC MATERIAL RESULTS
Total POM load!i/
Run
No. Date
Bum-cycle
2 December 3, 1975
4 December 4
6 December 5
8 December 6
10 December 7
12 December 8
POM
material^
1
2
3
1
2
3
I
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
' Kr/dacf£/
15.2
NDS/
339.7
3.3
3.3
137.8
12.4
3.6
77.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
197.3
ND
ND
837.0
Partial^./
iPR/ncmj/
34.7
ND
777.3
7.5
7.5
315.3
28.4
8.3
178.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
451.6
ND
ND
1,915.4
Ib/nrg/
44.2
ND
989.3
9.4
9.4
394.6
27.6
8.0
173.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
383.8
ND
ND
1,194.7
kg/hd/
20.0
ND
448.7
4.2
4.2
179.0
12.6
3.7
78.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
174.1
ND
ND
541.9
Sr/dscf*/
15.2
ND
370.2
22.6
13.8
205.3
12.4
8.1
118.6
26.7
8.9
257.3
12.7
20.7
513.8
51.0
60.2
1,485.3
Totalf./
-Efi/ncma/
34.7
ND
847.2
51.6
31.5
469.7
28.4
18.6
271.4
61.0
20.3
588.7
29.1
47.4
1,174.1
116.7
137.7
3,399.0
tb/hd./
44.2
ND
1,078.2
64.6
39.4
587.8
27.6
18.1
263.5
55.9
18.6
538.7
24.7
40.3
997.8
72.8
85.9
2,120.0
kg/hd/
20.0
ND
489.0
29.3
17.9
266.6
12.6
8.2
119.5
25.3
8.5
244.4
11.2
18.2
452.6
33.0
38.9
961.7
al 1 = Benz[cjphenanthrene
2 — Benz[ji]pyrene
3 = POM-like material
All other POM's not detectable.
b_/ Total for all stacks emitting during tests} 8 stacks for Runs Nos* 2, 4, 6, and 10; 7 stacks for Runs Nos. 8
and 12; grains per dry standard cubic feet and milligrams per normal cubic meters irrespective of number
of stacks.
£/ Partial = Front half of sampling train only (probe, first filter)
Total = Entire train
d/ gr/dscf = Grains per dry standard cubic foot x 10
mg/ncm = Milligrams per normal cubic meters x 10
Ib/hr = Pounds emissions per hour x 10"**
kg/hr — Kilograms emissions per hour x 10
e/ ND = Not detectable.
«-6
-------
The six sets of samples were analyzed for the following POMs:
Benz[£]phenanthrene
Benz[_a]pyrene
Dibenz|ja,hJ anthracene
3-Methylcholanthrene
7,12-Dimethylbenz[ja]anthracene
3,4,5,6-Dibenzocarbazole
Other materials found on the chromatograms were classified as
POM-like materials. These were defined as the total of unassigned peaks
eluting after 3-methylcholanthrene, and may reflect the degree of clean-
up. They were classed together and reported like the other POMs. Detect-
able quantities were found only for benz[cjphenanthrene, benz[_a]pyrene,
and the POM-like material. Quantities for the other POMs, if present,
were below the detection limits for the given sample volumes. The ranges
of the detection limits for the various POMs were as follows:
Benz[c_]phenanthrene: 1.2 to 4.1 |j,g/sample
Benz[ajpyrene: 1.0 to 2.0 |j,g/sample
Dibenz^,hjanthracene: 1.5 to 4.5 y,g/sample
3-Dimethylcholanthrene: 0.4 to 0.8 ng/sample
7,12-Dimethylbenz[ji]anthracene: 1.0 to 2.0 jig/sample
3,4,5,6-Dibenzocarbazole: 4.0 to 10.0 p,g/sample
13
-------
G. Visible Emissions
Observations of the visible emissions according to procedures
established in EPA's Method 9- were not made. However, frequent obser-
vation of the stacks by two trained, but not currently certified, obser-
vers indicated that the opacity was seldom, if ever, lower than 100%. As
compliance testing was not involved, it is felt that these observations
are valid as indicators of the general state of the visible emissions
from an operating charcoal kiln.
As the stack gas was at or near moisture saturation, some steam
may be included in the visible emissions, causing problems with the read-
ings. The plumes of the several stacks and kilns readily mingle, making
readings from any one stack difficult at times.
D. Heat of Combustion
Table 8 presents a summary of the heat of combustion data for
the five cryogenic samples. The heat of combustion values are given for
both the water and tar and oil fractions as recovered from the sampling
apparatus. The heats of vaporization given are for the amounts of water
collected. The net heat available from the flue gas stream is found by
summing the heats of combustion for each sample and subtracting the re-
spective heats of vaporization. The air/fuel ratios are approximate val-
ues for the volume of air per unit volume of flue gas needed for stoi-
chiometric combustion of the flue gas. The stoichiometric heat indicates
14
-------
TABLE 8
HEATS OF COMBUSTION
Volume
flue gas
sampled Sample
Dace (cf)£/ No.
December 4, 19752/ 0.84 1-1
1-2
-a.—- December &J 0.94 2-1
^^^jH 7-9
:*s&
HSI t-' December 1- 1.88 3-1
"•ISSP Ui 10
i*^8* December 8^ 2.57 4-1
-------
the quantity of heat required to combust the flue gas stream and added
air under stoichiometric conditions. The negative values indicate that
an additional fuel source must be provided as the flue gas stream will
not sustain combustion of itself. Additional information may be found
in Appendix E.
III. PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
A» Process Description
Charcoal in Missouri is manufactured by means of the pyrolysis,
2-4/
or destructive distillation of wood, utilizing the kiln method. The
wood is heated in generally air tight ovens using controlled amounts of
air. Wood moisture, volatiles, and combustion gases are driven off by .
the high temperatures generated. Combustion of part of the wood volatiles
produces heat to sustain the carbonization process. The waste gases are
emitted to the atmosphere through the kiln stacks leaving a product of
highly carbonized charcoal, along with some partially charred wood which
may be used in subsequent kiln loadings. Approximately 4,000 Ib (1,814
kg) of wood must be used to obtain 1,000 Ib (454 kg) charcoal.
A typical Missouri-type kiln is shown in Figure 1. Wood is
loaded through the door and the roof ventilation ports leaving some air
space along the bottom of the kiln. The fire is usually started at the
bottom center of the kiln using kindling or other easily combustible ma-
terials placed there during loading. During the start-up phase, the door
16
-------
•Clay Sewer
Pipe Stacks —
Roof Ventilation
Ports
Air Pipes
Steel Doors —
Concrete Walls
and Roof
Figure 1 - The Missouri-Type Charcoal Kiln
-------
and roof ventilation ports are left open. The ports are closed first
after approximately 1 hr and then the doors are closed after 2 to 3 hr.
Combustion air inflow is then provided through the use of air pipes near
the floor and controlled to prevent complete ashing of the wood* Stack
gas velocities are only slightly greater than natural convection and
may cease altogether at times in any given stack, depending on the loca-
tion of hot spots in the kiln, and wind direction and velocity. Generally,
the burn is completed when the fire has reached the floor of the kiln,
having burned from top to bottom and center to walls. At this time, all
openings are sealed off, preventing further air inflow or waste gas emis-
sion, killing the fire, and allowing the kiln to cool.
Burn times vary with the type and size of kiln, operator ex-
perience and practice, the type of wood used, and the degree of carbon-
ization or quality of product desired. A typical cycle may be within the
time frames given below:
1-2 days to load;
5-8 days to burn;
10-14 days to cool; and
1-2 days to unload.
The kilns are generally of concrete construction and may have
exposed walls or earthen embankments to provide insulation. Stacks may
be constructed of many materials but are usually of 6 to 8 in. (15.2 to
18
-------
20.3 cm) diameter clay sewer pipe with water pipe and galvanized stove
pipe also being used. Stack heights may vary from kiln to kiln or among
stacks of a given kiln. No emission control devices are known to be in
operation in Missouri on Missouri-type kilns.
B. Process Operation
The kiln tested at the Wulff Charcoal Company, Vienna,
Missouri, operates as a typical Missouri-type charcoal kiln. Drawings
of the kiln are presented in Figure 2. The kiln has been in operation
for 25 to 30 years. The wood utilized is generally white (post) oak,
and may be either fresh cut cordwood, aged (dried) cordwood, or sawmill
waste bark-edge slabwood. Prior to this test series, the kiln owner had
several truck loads of the various wood types measured and.weighed to
obtain an average pounds per cubic foot (pcf) value for the wood used
in this test kiln. This value is probably very representative as the
wood is stacked as tightly in the kiln as it is on the truck. The aver-
age value obtained was 29.5 pcf (472.5 kg/cu m). Thus, this kiln has a
capacity of approximately 191,300 Ib (86,790 kg) or 50.5 cords of wood.
Calculations relating to the kiln volume are found in Appendix F. Allow-
ing for air space left around the walls and roof and provided on the
floor, the usable wood volume would be approximately 45 cords (169,920
Ib, 77,074 kg), which will be used as the capacity for this test. As
most of the charcoal produced by Wulff Charcoal is used for industrial
19
-------
Earth
N
Air
Pipes
Concrete -
Earth
—
i
— *
-r*
\
^
:-
r:
•
i
~-e o ir-
61" 100" 94" . 1(
POO
Roof Ventilation
O— -rp — O.
r £
O 0 i
o o'
•—12" 384" (32')
! ! I ' J !
O o O
56" 100" 97" 10
W1
(
Cf~
- Do
>
^
*i
1
c
2"
"i i
•}
.
cl
or
)
,
j
)
53
n
L
X
\
\
7
7
12
7
i
41
2"
2"
0" T-
-I
,
'
-
'
io
0
N
• i
^>^'\ r\6" '-D-
JL//^ ^xxt \.
! 6" 1 |i Hi
i lii,1
— ^ i i P 'i
ik i ' ' i
"^ , 1 1 i n
— .in
^ IN it
00 | ' II |l|
!' 1 urn mm 1 !! ill
/ \
<— Air Pipes— ^
b. ELEVATION
D. Clay Sewer Pipe
a. PLAN
Stack No.5
Stack No. 4
•n
i
i
! C 45" 1 43^~ |
f * rf i r
1 1 i
!' '
1 i
ii
u
!!
n
n
n
f3 ^H"
• t "
i ? II
i n
i|
,i
. Steel
Air Pipes
4
-i
' T
|i 24"
!i
20" |
il
u
II t
U 20"
II
II
I'
L
c. SOUTH SIDE
( 1 ) Not to Scale
(2) All Measurements Approximate
Due to Surface Irregularities
d. NORTH SIDE
Figure 2 - Drawings of Sampled Kiln
-------
purposes, they try to obtain a higher degree of carbonization than is
normal. This also yields a lower amount of charcoal per cord of wood
than is normal, only around 800 lb (363 kg) charcoal per cord. Thus,
the charcoal production of the kiln for this test would be approximately
36,000 lb (16,330 kg).
The kiln was loaded and ready to be lit by noon, Tuesday,
December 2, 1975. Figure 3 presents a comparison of the kiln burn cycle
with the sampling test cycles. At first, the closed door was not completely
sealed but gradually the kiln was sealed such that only the air pipes
and exhaust stacks remained open. Close-down began on the afternoon of
Monday, December 8, 1975, with the sealing of two exhaust stacks and was
completed by approximately noon, Tuesday, December 9, 1975, yielding a
7-day burn cycle.
IV. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Sampling
Due to the nature of the charcoal kiln itself and the types
of materials emitted in the waste gas stream, in addition to the general
lack of information relating to the testing of a kiln during operation,
a portion of the task was to evolve a sampling train and technique that
would handle the effluent constituents with reasonable case.
Various sampling techniques were examined for use on the proj-
ect. One was to sample each emitting stack each day. This would yield up
21
-------
DATE
00
2 December 1975
(Tues)
3 December 1975
(Wed)
4 December 1975
.(Thur)
5 December 1975
(Fri)
6 December 1975
(Sot)
7 December 1975
(Sun)
8 December 1975
(Mon)
9 December 1975
(Toes)
00 06
Run 1
Run 3
Run 2
Run 5
Run 4
Run 7
Run 6
Run 9
Run 8
Run 11
Run 10
Run 13
Run 14
Run 12
Tl/
00 12
a oa a
A A 6
o
a o a a
A A A A
O
a a a a
O (
a a aa a
A A AAA
0 O
a a aa a
A AAA AA
O O
a a
am
A A AA
O
V\E
00 18
1240 1540
a a
ao o a a a
A A A A A
0 0
a o a a
A A A A
O •
a a a a
1 O
a a
A A
*
aa a
A A
o •
i acorn
A AA
o v ••
1240
00 24
00
a
A
o
Kiln Start-up
Burn Cycle
Kiln Close-down
Parti cu late-Organic
POM (5 min sample)
Orsat (grab sample)
Cryogenic sample
Figure 3 - Schedule of Burn and Testing Cycles
22
-------
to eight samples per day. However, as the proper recovery of samples is
time consuming, this method of sampling would not be practical for use
during 1 day. Another technique would be to composite several stacks into
one sample, yielding one to four samples per day. By compositing samples
from all emitting stacks into one daily sample, a closer compromise be-
tween the task objectives and an amount of work that could reasonably be
done in 1 day could be achieved. Thus, it was decided to sample each emit-
ting stack once per day, compositing the samples together for one sample
or run per day. Each stack would be sampled for the same amount of time
on a given day.
In order to do the actual testing, basically two train config-
urations were considered. The first method would involve manifolding the
stacks together and sampling the common duct. This method would involve
considerable problems in material deposition in the manifold ducting and
possible disruption of the normal operation of the kiln or the natural
draft of the stacks. It was rejected in favor of the other method. By
sampling each emitting stack in turn with the same sampling apparatus
without sample cleanup between stacks, samples from the individual stacks
would be automatically combined for a daily average. It was felt that by
using this sampling method and by modifying the standard EPA Method 5
sampling train,— a workable system would result.
23
-------
1. Mass and total organics
a. Preliminary tests; As tars and oils, present in the
waste gas stream, were predicted to plug a glass-fiber filter easily,
the filter was moved from its normal position at the front of the train
to the rear, just ahead of the silica gel (Figure 4). Also, as the pres-
ence of polycyclic organic matter (POM) in the effluent stream was being
investigated, 2% sodium carbonate was substituted for distilled water in
the first two impingers due to the greater solubility of POMs in sodium
carbonate. No probe or filter heaters were used. As the stack gas flow
rate was very low, glass tubing of approximately 0.5 in. (1.3 cm) ID was
used as a probe and probe tip.
To check out this train and related sampling procedures,
as well as the analytical techniques, a preliminary series of tests was
conducted at a kiln operated by Noblett Charcoal, Belle, Missouri. Two
1/2-hr tests (Runs Nos. 1-P and 2-P) were run on one stack of the kiln
during a burn cycle. The impingers were maintained in an ice water bath.
Stack gas temperatures were obtained using a thermocouple and potentio-
meter while stack gas velocities were measured with a Type 3002-2G Alnor
Velometer. The velocities were too low for accurate reading using the
standard Type-S pitot tube. The velometer presents problems as it is sus-
ceptible to ambient wind and possible internal interference due to oil
and tar entrained in the flue gas stream. Sampling was done at a constant,
24
-------
T
f
o
0
•Glass Fiber Filter
t
t
\
\
\
i
j
:
i
t
,
j
_j
;
.
\
m
i w
T
^
-4V-
V_?% <;«,«, im V.
x»———^ I \ vr yf ..i i.i. a.j *
_*j |*_~6" ^---\ — -/--- ^^Ar
Metering
Console
Sodium
Carbonate
-Silica Gel
Figure 4 - Preliminary Sampling Train A: Run Nos. 1-P and 2-P
-------
low flow rate of approximately 0.25 actual cubic feet per minute (0.007
actual cubic meters per minute). One flue gas determination by ORSAT
analysis was conducted. Moisture determinations were made using the
volume of collected water. The probe tip projected into the stack ap-
proximately 6 in. (15.3 cm) directly from the top. It was not practice-
able to establish ports in the stack and extensions were not used in
order to disturb the stack draft characteristics as little as possible.
Also, no traversing of the stack was done due to the large probe tip
size with respect to the small stack size. No general problems were en-
countered during sampling with this train.
As difficulties arose in the analysis of the samples of
the first preliminary series, a second preliminary series of testing
was done at Wulff Charcoal, Vienna, Missouri. In this series, four train
variations were examined, two for the mass and organic analysis and two
for the POM analysis, to be examined later. For the mass-organic trains,
the standard EPA Method 5 sampling train was used with the inclusion of
a filter prior to the silica gel (Figures 5 and 6). The first test (Run
No. 3-P) was done with both train filters at atmospheric temperature
while the second test (Run No. 4-P) was run with the first train filter
heated to approximately 350°F (177°C).
Due to the high moisture content of the flue gas (~ 30%
by volume), a considerable amount of water was condensed onto the un-
heated first filter during Run No. 3-P, filling perhaps one-third the
26
-------
/
Glass Fiber Filter
r
Glass Fiber Filter
6n
f
O
O
T, X X I 1 f"^"^ I
T i *P *r TT TT
/-Stack
i*—6"
Distilled
Water
Metering
Console
•Ice Bath
-Silica Gel
ISi
Figure 5 - Preliminary Sampling Train B: Run No. 3-P
'Glass Fiber Filter
Glass Fiber Filter
*
IA
a
0
i jjj
-»—»p>
350
-Stack
Distilled
Water
Silica Gel
Figure 6 - Preliminary Sampling Train C: Run No. 4-P
-------
volume of the filter holder. The second filter had no observable mate-
rial on it after 30-min running time. It is believed that the wet first
filter acted as scrubber or catalyst, removing more material than nor-
mal. The wet filter, however, is very difficult to handle.
Run No. 4-P was conducted to eliminate the wet first fil-
ter. During this run, the first filter remained dry and was much easier
to handle. The second filter was yellow in color after 30-min running
time. During both runs, the impinger solutions were cloudy indicating
that not all of the flue gas material was captured on the filter and
that water-soluble organics were present. Also, the filter support frit
contained condensed tar and oil. In all cases, the silica gel was dis-
colored, indicating a reaction with some substance passing through the
train or the collection of additional condensates.
In order to most closely comply with the EPA Method 5
sampling train for particulates and organic matter, Train C (Figure 6)
was chosen for use during the actual test series. This train also had
the advantage of eliminating the wet first filter. The first filter was
to be heated to 200 to 250°F (93.3 to 121.1°C).
Computer printouts of the field data for the preliminary
runs are presented in Appendix G.
b. Test series; Particulate and organic samples were
taken with Research Appliance Company Model 2243 "Stacksampler" equip-
ment, modified by MRI. Stack gas temperature readings were taken by
28
-------
thermocouple using a Thermo Electric Minimite Model 31101 potentiometer.
Stack gas velocities were taken with the Alnor Velometer, Type 3002-2G.
No traversing of the stacks was done due to the small
diameter of the pipes. As the stacks were made of clay sewer pipe, the
cutting of ports was considered impractical and no extensions were added
to the stacks in order not to disturb the natural flow characteristics.
The probe tip was merely inserted down into the center of the stack ap-
proximately 6 in. (15.3 cm). After the preliminary tests, it was believed
possible to approach an isokinetic sampling rate by working the EPA iso-
kinetic equation backwards, so to speak, for the actual gas volume to be
sampled for each 5-min sampling period. The equation used for this com-
putation is presented in Appendix H.
Sampling times per stack were chosen in order to optimize
maximum time and sample volume with minimum operation and cleanup prob-
lems. Sample times per stack were as follows:
Run No. 3 30 min
Run Nos. 5,7 20 min
Run Nos. 9, 11, 13 15 min
Run No. 14 10 min
No direct attempt was made to hold to the general EPA guidelines of a
2-hr sample time and 60-dscf sample volume.— Sample times were reduced
generally when the number of first filter changes became excessive due
29
-------
to filter plugging (excessive pressure drop) or when such changes were
forecast for the following run.
Flue gas velocities were measured every 10 min for each
run until Run No. 9, when they were measured once per stack. For each
run, these velocities remained fairly constant for each stack, within
the precision of the method of measurement. The metering console data
and flue gas temperatures were recorded every 5 min throughout the test
series. Periodic leak checks of the train were made in order to ensure
leak-free operation. In addition, visual examination of the train was
made during sampling on nearly every stack to ensure proper functioning.
The relationship between the run times and the burn cy-
cle has been presented in Figure 3. Run No. 1 was made in an attempt to
sample emissions during the start-up period. However, after sampling for
5 min on Stack 1, the draft became insufficient and no other stacks emit-
ted until after the doors had been closed. Therefore, Run No. 1 was com-
pleted by sampling 25 min with the probe projecting into the plume being
emitted out of the front door. A nominal duct diameter of 10 ft (3.048
m) was used in the calculations for Tables 1 through 5. Insufficient time
remained on that day to begin a normal test series.
Standard operation was to intersperse the POM sampling
with the particulate-organic sampling. This involved using both trains
on a stack in succession before moving to the next stack. Except for the
30
-------
first full day (December 3, Run No. 3), the POM run on a stack preceded
the particulate-organic run.
The stacks were sampled in the order 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, 6, 7,
8 except during Runs Nos. 9, 11, 13, and 14. For Run No. 9, Stacks 1 and
2 were not emitting at the start of the test so sampling was begun on
Stack 4. Subsequently, Stack 1 began emitting and was sampled last. Stack
2 never emitted and was not sampled. On Run No. 11, Stack 2 did not begin
emitting until after the start of the test and so was sampled last. Run
No. 13 was terminated during sampling on the second stack as a result of
repeated first filter changes and a difficulty in maintaining an isokine-
tic sampling rate. During Run No. 14, Stacks 4 and 8 ceased emitting and
were capped by kiln personnel, Stack 4 after being tested and Stack 8
prior to being tested. During Run No. 7, several stacks were emitting in-
termittently. This "puffing" was determined by continuously monitoring
the stack temperature. No sampling was done during period of no emissions.
During Run No. 3, the train configuration was changed in
that a cyclone and catch-bottle was inserted prior to the first filter
to provide a reservoir for the collected water. Due to the high moisutre
content of the gas' stream (~ 30%), the volume of water condensed was such
that even by heating the first filter box, all of the moisture could not
be maintained in the vapor stage. The cyclone-bottle combination was pro-
vided in order to retain this moisture and not have it fill up the hori-
zontal portions of the probe. During some runs, the collected water had
31
-------
to be emptied to prevent overflow. This water was combined with the im-
pinger catch.
Values for the percent moisture by volume of the gas
stream were determined in the field by measurement of the volume of wa-
ter condensate collected. Some of these values were subsequently found
to be slightly in excess of the saturation value for the average stack
temperature as read from a psycrometric chart. Therefore, the percent
moisture values for use in the computer calculations for Runs Nos. 1, 11,
13, and 14 were determined by volume calculations while those of Runs Nos.
3, 5, 7, and 9 were determined from a psychrometric chart. The value for
Run No. 1 is very low, probably due to mixing between the atmosphere and
the plume emerging from the open kiln door.
Two or three grab samples of the stack gas were taken per
day for ORSAT analysis of the stack gas composition. The values obtained
were averaged for each days' runs.
No sampling was done on December 9, 1975, as all of the
stacks were either partially or totally capped.
2. Polycyclic organic materials
a. Preliminary tests; After the first preliminary test
series, described earlier, the polycyclic organic material (POM) train
was modified by placing another filter in front of the sodium carbonate
impingers (Figures 7 and 8). This was done in an attempt to clean up the
32
-------
rGlass Fiber Filter
Glass Fiber Filter
T
8
-350°F' r-
i
/-Stack L_
I-—6"
2% Sodium
Carbonate
Dry
Ice Bath
•Silica Gel
u>
10
Figure 7 - Preliminary Sampling Train D: Run No. 5-P
f
4
o
o
O
»— ^
R
Glass Fiber Filter
Glass Fiber Filter
J
Metering
Console
2% Sodium
Carbonate
Dry
Bath
•Silica Gel
Figure 8 - Preliminary Sampling Train E: Run No. 6-P
-------
impinger solutions for ease of analysis. The first test (Run No. 5-P)
was done with the first filter heated to approximately 350°F (177°C),
while the second test (Run No. 6-P) was run with both filters at am-
bient temperature.
During Run No. 5-P, the first filter remained dry. The
second filter was yellow in color after 30 min running time. Run No.
6-P was conducted to see if condensed water would pass through a hori-
zontal filter and frit easier than through a vertical assembly. This
proved to be the case but the wet filter was still hard to handle.
Again, all impinger solutions were cloudy and the filter support frit
contained tar and oil.
For the actual test series, Train D (Figure 7) was chosen
in order to maintain a dry first filter and to remove as much material
as possible prior to the impinger solutions/The first filter was to be
heated to 200 to 250°F (93.3 to 121.1°C).
Computer printouts of the field data for the preliminary
runs are presented in Appendix G.
b. Test series; The same sampling equipment and tech-
niques were used for the POM testing as for the particulate-organic
testing. POM concentrations in the preliminary samples were found to be
of sufficient magnitude to allow for a minimal sampling time during the
test series in order to keep the impinger solutions as clean as possible.
34
-------
Sampling times of 5 min/stack were used for all runs. First filters were
replaced as necessary.
Flue gas velocities were measured prior to sampling each
stack. The metering console data and flue gas temperatures were recorded
every 5 min. Periodic leak checks and visual inspections of the train
were made to ensure proper functioning.
The stacks were sampled in the same order as for the
particulate-organic train with the same exceptions. For Run No. 8, Stacks
1 and 2 were not emitting at the start of the test, Stack 1 being sampled
last and Stack 2 omitted due to lack of emissions. On Run No. 10, Stack
2 did not begin emitting until midway through the test and so was sampled
last. During Run No. 12, Run No. 13 (particulate-organic) was terminated.
Run No. 12 was held up until Run No. 14 had caught up in the number of
stacks sampled. For Run No. 12, Stack 8 was not tested as it was sealed
before it could be tested. During Run No. 6, several stacks emitted only
intermittantly. This was detected by constant monitoring of the flue gas
temperature and no sampling was done during period of "puffing."
No cyclone assembly had to be added to the train to catch
condensed water vapor but moisture collected in the probe elbow prior
to the first filter was periodically added to the contents of the first
impinger. Percent moisture values were determined as for the particulate-
organic train, those for Runs Nos. 10 and 11 calculated from volume com-
putations while those for Runs Nos. 2, 4, 6, and 8 were obtained from a
psychrometric chart.
35
-------
3. Flammability limits and heat of combustion; Another por-
tion of the sampling program was to determine if a flaramability limit
could be established. This is the amount of air that must be combined
with the flue gas stream in order to sustain combustion, data useful in
exploring control device possibilities for the kilns.
The apparatus used is shown in Figure 9. The chamber was
filled with flue gas using the inlet blower. When this was accomplished,
the inlet was directed towards ambient air and the spark or flame source
was initiated. The flue gas in the chamber and the incoming ambient air
were mixed using the inlet and outlet blowers. Three ignition methods
were tried, two spark and one open flame.
Several tests were attempted during the preliminary tests and
the actual test series. At no time could the flue gas be made to ignite.
It is thought that the high moisture content of the stack gas stream may
be responsible for this failure to ignite.
In an attempt to obtain some useful information relating to
the combustion qualities of the stack gas, five cryogenic samples were
taken during the actual test series in order to determine the heat of
combustion of the condensed material. The sampling apparatus is shown
in Figure 10. A 0.5-in. ID stainless steel "U"-tube was placed in a dry-
ice-ethanol bach (-97.6°F, -72°C) and a sample was drawn at a very low
flow rate using the RAG meter console until the trap was sealed with
36
-------
CO
Plexiglas
Front
Outlet
Blower
Spark Plug
Outlet
Blower
Inlet Blower
Inlet, Secondary
Spark Source
and Open Flame
Ports
Plywood
Chamber
Plexiglas
Front
Secondary
Spark
Source
Plywood
Chamber
a. SIDE VIEW
b. FRONT VIEW
Figure 9 - Flammability Limits Apparatus
-------
to
oo
Dewar
Flask
Stainless Steel "U" -Trap
Wood
Cover
Cryogenic
Bath
Metering
Console
Figure 10 - Cryogenic Sampling Apparatus
-------
condensed material. For the last two tests, a salt water-ice bath (14°F,
-10°C) was substituted for the dry ice-ethanol bath. These samples were
run for 15 min but were not cold enough to freeze.
B. Analysis
1. Mass and total organicsi At the conclusion of each run,
the samples were recovered at the sampling site. The filters were placed
in clean, wide-mouth glass jars. All filters from a given position in
the train, i.e., first or second, for each run were placed in the same
jar. All glassware ahead of the first filter was washed with acetone into
a clean, narrow-mouth glass bottle and sealed with a poly-seal cap. The
impinger water was measured volumetrically and stored in a clean, narrow-
mouth glass bottle with a poly-seal cap. The impingers, and all glassware
behind the first filter, were then rinsed with acetone into a separate
clean, narrow-mouth glass bottle having a poly-seal cap. The silica gel
was weighed and discarded. The samples, after recovery, were transported
to Kansas City by truck for analysis.
For the first set of preliminary runs, it was believed that
the sodium carbonate solution could be utilized for both mass-organic
and POM evaluations. However, it was discovered that the sodium carbon-
ate was taken up by the ether-chloroform extraction process, resulting
in a white, crystalline mass in the sample residue. Thus, the train con-
figuration was changed for the other preliminary series and for the actual
test series.
39
-------
The mass samples were analyzed as specified in the referenced
Federal Register«~ To obtain data for the total organics portion of the
task, the filters were extracted ultrasonically using three 25-ml por-
tions of chloroform followed by three 25-ml portions of ether. Each por-
tion was decanted from the filter residue using disposable pipettes. The
filter particles collected in the ether-chloroform extract were then cen-
trifuged out and rinsed with ether and chloroform until no color was de-
tected in the rinses. The combined ether-chloroform washings were evapor-
ated in an ambient air hood, dessicated, and weighed. This result was
compared with that of the total mass filter weight and the organic frac-
tion was determined. This fraction was then applied to the acetone rinses
to determine their organic fractions. The total organic load was obtained
by summing all of the organic fractions with the result of the ether-
chloroform extraction of the impinger water.
2. Polycyclic organic materials; The POM samples were re-
covered in the field in the same manner as the mass samples except that
clean, brown-glass bottles with poly-seal caps were used for all solu-
tions.
The sodium carbonate impinger solutions were extracted in a
separatory funnel using three 100-ml portions of cyclohexane. The acetone
rinses were evaporated to dryness using a stream of nitrogen gas. They
were then extracted with cyclohexane, using 20-, 20-, and 5-ml portions.
40
-------
The filters were extracted ultrasonically using cyclohexane, also using
20-, 20-, and 5-ml portions. The extractions were eluted on 20-gram col-
umns of fluorisil eluted with 250 ml of 15% ether in hexane. The samples
were analyzed using a Varian Model 1400 gas chromatograph with a scandium
tritide electron capture detector. The 6 ft by 2 mm ID glass column was
packed with 3% Dexil 300 GC on 100/120 Supelcoport. A nitrogen carrier
gas flow rate of 30 ml/min was used. The temperatures utilized for the
injection port, column, and detector were 255, 290 and 295°C, respectively.
3. Heat of combustion; The cryogenic samples were recovered
after the return to Kansas City. The stainless steel U-traps were opened
and the water fraction of each trap poured into a separate clean glass
bottle and sealed with a poly-seal cap. The material remaining in each
trap was then rinsed with acetone into separate clean glass bottles. The
acetone rinses were evaporated to dryness at approximately 55°C, cooled
to room temperature, and sealed with poly-seal caps. Both sets of samples
were weighed and then sent to Kansas City Testing Laboratories for anal-
ysis. The heat of combustion results were obtained by Adiabatic Bomb
Calorimeter. Filter paper pellets were used as a fuel source for both
the water and the tar and oil fractions. The tar and oil fraction samples
were transferred to the bomb cup via filter paper. A slight residue was
observed in the bomb cup after each firing, indicating that the values
may be on the low side.
41
-------
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
!• The data presented in this report results from a single
series of tests at a single kiln. It is not known how various woods would
effect the emission characteristics. Other factors that could play a role
are the meterological conditions and kiln operator techniques. Prior to
any extensive setting of regulations regarding the charcoal kiln industry,
other tests at other kilns should be considered to evaluate these other
factors.
2. It is possible that more uniform mass data could be obtained
by sampling with a train that does not employ the first filter, similar
to the EPA sampling train for sulfuric acid mist.— In this train, the
flue gas stream is passed directly to the impingers before going to a
final filter. This would eliminate the constant need for replacement of
the first filter resulting from heavy loading and excessive pressure
drop across the filter. Also, due to the nature of the flue gas stream,
the amount of material that passes through the filter is somewhat depen-
dent on the temperature at which the first filter is maintained in the
sample box. Because of the variations in the precision of different sam-
ple box heaters, the amount of material collected on the first filter
could vary from test to test, thus affecting the "front-half" emission
calculations. By going to the impingers directly, the need to heat the
probe or otherwise handle the condensed flue gas water vapor would be
eliminated.
42
-------
3. The low stack gas velocity inherent in charcoal kiln op-
eration is difficult to measure by normal means• The velometer used in
this test worked satisfactorily but as has been mentioned, is affected
by ambient wind and possibly by the flue gas constituents. Other methods
should be investigated to determine the most suitable.
4. Further work needs to be done to determine the combustion
characteristics of the flue gas stream if control methods are envisioned
for the charcoal industry. Enhanced combustion might be achieved by re-
moving all or part of the water vapor from the flue gas stream. The pos-
sibility of using charcoal as the heat source for waste gas combustion
might also be explored.
43
-------
REFERENCES
1. Environmental Protection Agency, "Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources," Federal Register, Vol. 36, No. 159, Part II,
Tuesday, August 17, 1971.
2. Engineering Science, Inc., "Exhaust Gases from Combustion and Indus-
trial Processes," Chapter IV-3, Environmental Protection Agency
Contract No. EHSD 71-36, October 1971.
3. Jarvis, J. Pitts, Jr., "The Wood Charcoal Industry in the State of
Missouri," Engineering Series Bulletin No. 48, Engineering Exper-
iment Station, University of Missouri at Columbia, Vol. 61, No.
21, Columbia, Missouri, May 2, 1960.
4. Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., "Air Pollution Control for
Missouri Charcoal Kilns," prepared for the Missouri Air Conserva-
tion Commission, Jefferson City, Missouri, February 1971.
5. Hodgman, Charles D. (ed.), Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 23rd
Ed., Chemical Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, Ohio (1939).
6. Dean, John A. (ed.), Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, llth Ed., McGraw-
Hill Book Company, New York (1973).
44
-------
APPENDIX A
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - COMPUTER COMPUTATIONS
(TOTAL PARTICULATE)
45
-------
TABLE A-l
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 1
ATMOS
TEMP
(06. F)
60.0
PORT-
POINT
1
D
I)
0
D
f)
ATMOS
PHES
(I.HG)
29.26
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
802.84
804.15
806.04
808.02
810.29
812.96
H?0
COND
(ML)
31.0
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.002
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG)
786.70
DELTA
II
(I.H20)
.150
.250
.400
.450
.550
.850
OATH- 12-02-75
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL
(MG)
955
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
62.0
64.0
67.0
72.0
80.0
85.0
.70
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
62.0
64.0
64.0
64.0
6Q.O
69.0
AREA
(FT?)
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.5
4.0
5.5
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
801.61
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
62.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
PERC PERC PERC PI
02 C02
DRY DRY
9.2 11.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
CO T
TOT
URF
DRY COFF
1.9 .
VP.L
(FPH
150.
300.
300.
300.
300.
300.
050
)
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-2
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG
40
.F )
.0
PORT-
PO
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
INT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
( I . HG )
29.31
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
RUN- 3
H?0 PARTIC
COND WT-PTL
(I.H20) (ML)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) 1
814.74
816.47
818.17
819.87
821.61
823.47
825.05
826.78
828.66
830.53
832.47
834.18
836.32
838.47
840.49
842.42
844.38
846.64
675.2
DELTA
P
(I.H20)
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.009
.009
.007
.007
.009
.009
(MG)
2162.50
DELTA
H
U.H?0)
.400
.350
.330
.350
.370
.400
.300
.400
.440
.400
.350
.350
.550
.530
.450
.400
.500
.550
DATE- 12-03-75
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) (FT?)
4855
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
42.0
46.0
56.0
59.0
66.0
69.0
56.0
61.0
72.0
64.0
72.0
74.0
65.0
71.0
79.0
80.0
85.0
87.0
.10
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
44.0
44.0
44.0
45.0
48.0
49.0
55.0
56.0
58.0
59.0
60.0
61.0
62.0
63.0
64.0
65.0
66.0
68.0
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
2.5
2.5
3.0
4.0
7.0
7.5
11.0
14.0
14.0
4.0
9.0
9.0
10.0
6.5
6.5
6.5
8.0
9.0
(DCF)
813.01
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
145.0
140.0
140.0
140.0
140.0
140.0
150.0
150.0
150,0
145.0
150.0
150.0
130.0
130.0
135.0
135.0
130.0
135.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
9.2 11.0 1
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.9 .850
VEL
(FI'M)
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
320.0
320.0
350.0
350.0
-------
TABLE A-2 (Concluded)
RUN-
DATE- 12-03-75
00
PORT-
PO
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
INT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(M1N)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
848.58
850.39
852.26
854.17
656.33
858.82
860.99
863.59
066.03
868.03
870.31
872.79
875.34
878.03
880.37
882.08
884.03
886.24
888.17
889.99
891.61
893.37
894.87
896.38
898.77
901.12
903.36
905.49
907.40
909.35
HELTA
P
(I.H20)
.006
.006
.008
.008
.009
.009
.011
.011
.008
.008
.014
.014
.011
.011
.006
.006
.008
.008
.006
.006
.005
.005
.004
.004
.011
.011
.008
.008
.007
.007
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.500
.400
.450
.400
.500
.700
.700
.750
.700
.600
.750
.700
.750
.800
.800
.550
.550
.650
.550
.450
.400
.400
.300
.300
.650
.650
.550
.550
.400
.400
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
65.0
70.0
80.0
83.0
81.0
87.0
76.0
82.0
95.0
94.0
98.0
100.0
82.0
«9.0
98.0
98.0
98.0
100.0
86.0
90.0
95.0
97.0
100.0
98.0
82.0
87.0
95.0
96.0
99.0
99.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
66.0
66.0
67.0
68.0
70.0
72.0
73.0
74.0
75.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
78.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
81.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
83.0
84.0
84.0
81.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
11.0
11.0
14.0
15.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.5
7.5
8.0
10.0
14.0
6.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
10.0
8.0
n.O
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
145.0
145.0
145.0
145.0
140.0
140.0
160.0
165.0
160.0
160.0
165.0
165.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
155.0
150.0
155.0
155.0
155.0
155.0
165.0
165.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
70.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
60.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
55.0 .600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
400.0
400.0
350.0
350.0
450.0
450.0
400.0
400.0
300.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
300.0
300.0
280.0
200.0
250.0
250.0
400.0
400.0
350.0
350.0
320.0
320.0
-------
TABLE A-3
PARTICIPATE DATA AMD CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
U)G
50
.F)
.0
PORT-
PO
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
INT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
-------
t_n
O
TABLE A-3 (Concluded)
IU)M- 5 DATE- 12-04-75
PORT-
PO
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
B
8
8
B
INT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
942.89
945.26
947.63
950.01
952.39
954.77
957.19
959.60
961.40
963.18
964.95
966.73
969.13
971.54
973.93
976.43
DELTA
P
I.H?0)
.011
• Oil
.01 1
.01 1
.011
.011
.011
.011
.006
.006
.006
.006
.011
.011
.011
.011
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.700
.700
.650
.650
.700
.650
.700
.700
.500
.400
.350
.300
.650
.650
.650
.650
TEMP
IN
(O.F)
73.0
79.0
91.0
95.0
83,0
90.0
100.0
103.0
86.0
89.0
95.0
97.0
90.0
96.0
104.0
108.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
65.0
75.0
76.0
77.0
80.0
81.0
83. 0
83.0
84.0
05.0
86.0
87.0
86.0
88.0
88.0
90.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
11.5
12.0
5.0
5.0
5.5
6.5
10.0
10.5
11.5
12.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
160.0
155.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
165.0
160.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
160.0
160.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T niA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
65.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEl.
(FPM)
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
AOO.O
400.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
-------
TABLE A-4
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(06.
50.
F)
0
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.25
SAMP
TIME
( 1-1 1 N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) <
978.81
980.18
981.61
983.08
984.80
986.52
988.47
990.56
992.31
994.20
995.95
997.72
999.19
1000.66
1002.10
1003.49
RUN- 7
H?0 PARTIC
COND WT-PTL
(ML)
624.7
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.004
.004
.004
.006
.006
.008
.008
.006
.006
.006
.006
.004
.004
.004
.004
(MG)
10536.20
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.300
.250
.250
.250
.350
.300
.400
.500
.350
.450
.400
.400
.300
.250
.250
.250
DATE.- 12-05-75
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL AREA
(MG) 1
62150
TEMP
IN
(O.F)
64.0
68.0
72.0
74.0
72.0
77.0
85.0
88.0
78.0
81.0
90.0
92.0
80.0
82.0
88.0
90.0
.60
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
66.0
67.0
67.0
68. 0
70.0
71.0
73.0
74.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
81.0
82.0
!FT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
8.0
8.5
10.0
11.0
1?.0
12.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
6.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
977.30
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
155.0
150.0
150.0
155.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
165.0
160.0
165.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBF
DRY DRY DRY COEF
9.2 17.2 4
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(O.F) (IN)
.600
.600
60.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
65.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
60.0 .600
.600
.1 .850
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
250.0
250.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
250.0
250.0
250.0
250.0
-------
TABLE A-4 (Concluded)
RUM-
DATE- 12-05-75
Ol
N>
PORT-
PO
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
H
INT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
1005.43
1007.39
1009.53
1011.61
1013.61
1015.64
1017.64
1019.41
1021.70
1023.97
1026.25
102B.50
1029.96
1031.42
1032.96
1034.54
DELTA
P
(I.H20)
.008
.008
.008
.000
.008
.008
.007
.007
.010
.010
.010
.010
.004
.004
.005
.005
DELTA TEMP
H
(I.H20)
.450
.450
.550
.550
.550
.500
.450
.350
.700
.700
.650
.650
.400
.400
.300
.300
IN
(D.F)
70.0
74.0
84.0
87.0
77.0
83.0
92.0
94.0
84.0
92.0
98.0
103.0
80.0
81.0
86.0
89.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
74.0
74.0
74.0
75.0
77.0
78.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
82.0
83.0
84.0
80.0
ei.o
82.0
81.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
9.0
10.0
11.0
11.0
5.0
9.0
10.0
9.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.5
5.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
160.0
165.0
165.0
170.0
170.0
165.0
160.0
165.0
185.0
185.0
190.0
185.0
180.0
175.0
175.0
175.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
325.0
325.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
250.0
250.0
275.0
275.0
-------
TABLE A-5
PART1CULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
Ul
OJ
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
40.0
PORT-
POINT
4 1
4 1
4 1
3 1
3 1
3 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
6 1
6 1
6 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29. 6b
SAMP
TIME
( M I M )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(1.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(OCF) (
36.12
37.68
39.44
41.1?
42.73
44.51
46.19
47.87
49.55
50.96
52.36
53.76
HUN- 9
H20 PARTIC
COND
(ML)
316.4
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.004
.004
.004
WT-PTL
(MG)
3719.50
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.300
.350
.400
.400
.400
.400
.400
.400
.350
.250
.250
.250
DATE- 1
PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
8569
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
40.0
43.0
49.0
48.0
51.0
57.0
51.0
55.0
60.0
54.0
58. 0
60.0
.10
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
40.0
41.0
42.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
50.0
50.0
51.0
52.0
52.0
53.0
2-06-75
STACK
AREA
(FT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
4.0
5.0
6.5
fl.O
8.0
9.0
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.0
10.5
11.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
34.54
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
160.0
160.0
145.0
145.0
145.0
150.0
155.0
155.0
150.0
155.0
155.0
PF.RC PERC PERC PI
02 C02
DRY DRY
6.4 16.1
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
TOT
CO TURF.
DRY COEF
1.5 .
VFL
(FPM
300.
300.
300.
300.
300.
300.
300.
300.
300.
250.
250.
250.
850
)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
Ln
-P-
TABLE A-5 (Concluded)
»«UN- 9 OATE- 12-06-75
PORT-
POINT
7
7
7
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
i
i
i
i
SAMP
TIME
(HIM)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
55.53
57.10
58.69
60.44
63.05
63.70
65.39
67.09
68.72
DELTA
P
I.H20) 1
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
DELTA
H
II.H20)
.400
.350
.300
.400
.350
.350
.350
.350
.350
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
55.0
59.0
63.0
54.0
58.0
63.0
60.0
64.0
68.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
54.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
56.0
56.0
56.0
56.0
58.0
TRAIN
VAC
STACK S.GEL PROBE
TEMP TEMP T 01 A
(I.HG) ('D.F) (D.
4.0
5.0
7.5
13.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
12.5
13.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
170.0
170.0
155.0
155.0
160.0
,F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VFL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
-------
TABLE A-6
PARTICIPATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DO
40
.F)
.0
PORT-
PO
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
5
5
5
6
6
6
INT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.65
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
CDCF) (
72.13
73.50
74.86
76.66
78.44
80.25
81.87
B3.43
84.83
86.49
88.34
90.09
91.69
93.32
94.94
RUN- 1 1
H20 PAPTIC
COND WT-PTL
(ML)
370.0
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.004
.004
.008
.008
.000
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
(MG)
6043.60
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.250
.250
.250
.400
.400
.400
.300
.300
.300
.350
.400
.400
.400
.350
.350
OATE- 12-07-75
PARTIC STACK ]
WT-TTL AREA
(MG) 1
12969
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
44.0
47.0
51.0
48.0
53.0
59.0
52.0
5M.O
62.0
52.0
57.0
63.0
55.0
59.0
65.0
.50
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
45.0
45.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
47.0
48.0
49.0
50.0
50.0
51.0
51.0
52.0
53.0
54.0
IFT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
3.0
4.0
6.0
9.0
9.0
9.5
9.5
11.0
13.5
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
[NIT
VOL
(DCF)
70.83
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
170.0
170.0
170.0
200.0
200.0
205.0
170.0
160.0
160.0
170.0
185.0
190.0
175.0
180.0
100.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COF.F
5.1 18.2 5.
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
56.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
5 .850
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
250.0
250.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
-------
TABLE A-6 (Concluded)
RUN- 11
DATE- 12-07-75
Ln
PORT-
POINT
7
7
7
8
8
8
2
2
?.
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF )
96.57
9B.16
99.72
101.28
102.85
104.42
105.74
107.04
108.36
DELTA
P
(I.H20)
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.005
.005
.005
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.350
.350
.300
.300
.300
.300
.250
.200
.200
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
53.0
57.0
61.0
59.0
62.0
65.0
60.0
62.0
66.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
54.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
56.0
57.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
1H5.0
195.0
190.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
335.0
330.0
330.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T 01 A
(D.F) (IN)
.600
55.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
-------
TABLE A-7
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 13
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
40.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.35
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(OCF) (
112.45
113.52
115.01
116.04
116.76
M?0
COND
(ML)
52.5
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.005
.005
.005
.003
.003
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG)
1577. ao
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.250
.200
.300
.100
.050
DATE- 12-08-75
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL AREA
(MG) (FT2)
2566.
TEMP
IN
(D.F) (
42.0
45.0
50.0
42.0
45.0
30
TEMP
OUT
D.F)
45.0
45.0
45.0
44.0
45.0
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
9.0
14.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
111.14
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
320.0
325.0
290.0
320.0
330.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
1.1 22.3 6.
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
7 .850
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
300.0
250.0
250.0
-------
TABLE A-8
PARTICIPATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
oo
ATMOS
TEMP
( 06 . F
40.0
PORT
)
POINT
1
1
2
2
4
4
3
3
5
5
6
6
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
39.35
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(1.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
118.09
119.36
120.31
120.98
122.15
123.22
124.27
125.27
126.59
127.71
129.27
130.65
132.00
133.17
RUM- 14
H?0 PARTIC
COND
(ML)
176.0
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.005
.005
.002
.002
.003
.003
.003
.002
.006
.006
.004
.004
.004
.004
WT-PTL
(MG)
6858.70
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.200
.200
.100
.100
.200
.200
.200
.150
.250
.150
.300
.300
.300
.250
DATE- 1
PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
10048
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
43.0
46.0
46.0
47.0
50.0
53.0
45.0
47.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
54.0
52.0
55.0
.90
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
45.0
46.0
46.0
47.0
4«.0
4 8 . 0
47.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
48.0
49.0
50.0
2-08-75
STACK INIT
AREA
(FT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
2.5
5.0
7.0
12.0
4.0
10.0
4.0
11.0
8.0
e.o
4.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
VOL
(DCF)
116.76
STACK
TEMP
(O.F)
325.0
320.0
325.0
330.0
235.0
245.0
200.0
215.0
335.0
335.0
295.0
325.0
300.0
325.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02
DRY DRY
l.l 22.3
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
50.0 .600
.600
.600
.ISOO
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
CO TUBE
DRY COEF
6.7 .850
Vfc-L
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
200.0
200.0
220.0
220.0
200.0
200.0
340.0
340.0
200.0
280.0
280.0
280.0
-------
TABLE A-9
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS 1
12-02-75 12-03-75 12-04-75
DN
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD
V*'
vwv
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS .
TS
NP
PST
PS
vs
.AS
QS
QA
PERI
MF
MT
1C .
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX...
EA
PROBE TIP ..DIAME.IER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP.
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
... VOL DRY..GAS-S.TD .COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE. BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT.. 0.2 .t.Y...VOL.»_..DRY ... ._
PERCENT CO 3Y VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR-.-*! -.DR.Y.. .STK GAS
MOLECULAR *'T-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC. .PRES .OF STACK.
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK. A«EA . .
STK FLOwRATE, DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOfcRATE
PERCENT ISOKINEJIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC...IHPJMGER_CA1CH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
..PART.. LQAD-PILjSTK.CN..
PART. LOAO-TTL,STK CM
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
P A RT I C. . E M I S.-T.OJ Al
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
- IN _..
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
OCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
1N.K20
OEP.F
.. IN . HG
IN.HG
FPM
IN2. ...
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
L8/HR
LB/.KS.
.600
30.0
29.26
.442
11.35
68.4
- Jl»15.
31.0
1.47
11.6
.884
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13.
28.72
.850
.007
52.0
6
-0.00
29.26
275 ,
11, 310='.
a 1
19,326='
21,601-
76.7
786.70
955.70
. 17.68
1.08703
1.32054
.97224
1.18110
180
219
67
,600
240.0
29.31
..506
96.34
75.5
93.53
675.2
32.00
25.5
.745
11.0
.9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.04
.650
.008
150.5
46
-0.00
29.31
332
29
42
66
94. C.
2162.50
4855.10
55.46.
.35606
.79940
•Z256Q
.50651
.13k/
.29-k/..
67
.600
160.0
29.31
.539
67. OB
79. B
64.61
596.0
26.35
30.5
.695
15.0
7.3
2.9
74.8
30.69
26.82
.850
.006
15S.3
3?
-0.00
29.31
353
29
1 1
71
99.5
3178.70
9264.70
65.69
.75769
2.20837
.44224
1.28895 .
.27k/
.78k/
4?
£/ Nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
59
-------
TABLE A-9 (Continued)
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
11
12-05-75 12-06-75 12-07-75
DN
TT
PB
PM .. ..
VM
TM
VMSTD
VW
VWV
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
VS
AS
OS
OA
PEP- 1
MF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT .
CAU
CAW
CAX
EA
.PROBE.. TIP ILI.AM.ET.ER.
NET TIMt OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
A.V.G. .ORIFICE PRES .DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL .DKY._.GAS-STD....COND
TOTAL M20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
.PERCENT MQIST.UPE.JBY. VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT 0?_.6Y...V.O.Lf. DPY. _.
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR .wT-DRY ..STK_..GA.S
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD ..
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF. .STACK..
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE* DRY.STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOwRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAU-PTL*STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOApj-PTL.»STK ..CN . . .
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
P A R T I C. EMI S- T_Q T AJ
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN..
WIN
IN.HG
IN.HZO .
DCF
DEG.F
D.SCF.
ML
' SCF
IN.HZO
DEG.F
...IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
IN2.
DSCrM
ACFK
MG"
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GP/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
.. .LB/.HP..
..600--
160.0
29.25
. . .. .412
57.24
79.6
- 55.00
6?4.7
29.61
35.0
.650
17.2
.9.2
4.1
6S.5
31.12
26.53
.850
.006
16^.8
32
-0.00
29.25
309
.29
33
62
1.04.6
10536.20
62150.60
.. .83.05
2.95024
17.40280
1.59022
9.38035,
.84i/
4.98£/.
64
...600-
105.0
29.65
.35G
34.18
53.3
35.00.
316.4
15.00
30.0
.700
lf>. 1
. 6.4.
1.5
76.0
30.63
26.98
.850
,.006 ..
157.1
21
-0.00
29.65
293
. 29
35
59
97. .0
3719.50
6569.10
56.59
1.63650
3.77023
.97498
2.24620
.49k/
.. -i.iak/.
39
.6.00
120.0
29.65
.319
37.53
54.4
-3?,. 35
370.0
17.54
31.4
.686
18.2
. 5.1
5.5
71.?
.31.12
27.00
.850
.006
202.7
24
-0.00
29.65
300
29
33
60
99.4
6043.60
12969.50
53.40
2.42671
5.20770
1.31975
2.83217
.68*'
.. . 1.461/
14
aj Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
b/ Per stackj to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
60
-------
TABLE A-9 (Concluded)
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
13
ON
TT
PB
PK
VM
TM
VMSTD
VW
VWV
PMOS
MO
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
vs
AS
QS
QA
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX
EA
DATE OF RUN
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP ...
VOL DRY GAS-METER CONO
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL.
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOLt DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DR.Y STK....6AS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD ..
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTU5TD CN
PART. LOAO-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAp-PTLirSTK^CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN.
MIN
IN.HG
.IN.H20 . .
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
IN.H20
DEG.F
IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
IN 2 ....
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
L8/HR
LB/HR
12-08-75
. ...^600
25.0
29.35
_.180
5.62
44.8
... 5.79
52.5
2.49
.. .30.1
.699
22.3
.1.1..
6.7
69.9
31.61...
27.52
.850
.. .004
317.0
5
_ ....TO..OCL.
29.35
280
29.
26
56
J99.7..
1577.80
2566.30
38,52
4,19602
6,82485
1.96373
3.19402
.94£/
1.531/
-11
12-08-75
.600
70.0
29.35
. - .207
16.41
46.0
16.80
176.0
3.34
33.2
.666
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
. 31.61
27.10
.850
.004
293.6
14
-0.00
29.35
260
29
24
52
101,7
6858.70
10048.90
31.75
6.28550
9.20908
2,89786
4.24575
1.29k/
1.89k/
-11
aj Per stackj to obtain total multiply by 1.67
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
61
-------
TABLE A-10
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA
(METRIC RE SULTS)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS 1 3 5
12-02-75 12-03-75 12-04-75
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VW
VWM
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MM
CP
DPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
OSM
QAM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TINF. OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL » DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
MET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE* DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CM
PART. LOAO-TTL«STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC FMIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
OEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HP
.600
30.0
29.26
.442
11.35
68.4
.32
31.0
.04
11.6
.884
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13.
28.72
.850
.007
11.1
6
-0.00
29.26
83.8
11,3101'
5 47 */
612*7
76.7
786.70
955.70
17.68
2487.49
3021.85
2224.82
2702.75
82
99
67
.600
240.0
29.31
.506
96.34
75.5
2.6S
675.2
.91
25.5
.745
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.04
.850
.008
f.S.8
48
-0.00
29.31
101.2
29
1.2
1.9
94.0
2162.50
4855.10
55.46
814.79
1829.31
516.25
1159.06
.058k/
.13ll/
f>7
.600
160.0
29.31
.539
67.08
79.8
1.83
5^8.0
.80
30.5
,695
15.0
7.3
2.9
74.8
30.69
26.82
.850
.008
70.1
32
-0.00
29.31
107.7
29
1.2
2.0
99.5
3178.70
9264.70
65.69
1733.81-)
5053.51
1011.99
2949.56
.nik/
.354k/
4?
aj Nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stackj to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
62
-------
TABLE A-10 (Continued)
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
(METRIC RESULTS)
DESCRIPTION
DATE OK RUN
UNITS
11
12-05-75 12-06-75 12-07-75
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VW
VWM
PMOS
MO
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MM
CP
DPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
QSM
QAM
PERI
MF
HT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIKE OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY 6AS-STD COND
TOTAL H2G COLLECTED
VOL H«:0 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL* DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL« DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL » DRY
PERCENT N2 hY VOL* DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK CAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATEi DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOwRATE
PERCENT ISOKINF.TIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINIJER CATCH
PART. LOAU-PTL.STO CN
PAHT. LOAO-TTLISTD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL. ,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC ECUS-PARTIAL
PART 1C I: MIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIH
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
OEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN?
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
.600
160.0
29.25
.412
57.24
79. B
1.56
624.7
.84
35.0
.650
17.2
9.2
4.1
69.5
31.12
26.53
.aso
.0.06
73.8
32
-0.00
29.25
94.3
29
.9
1.8
104.6
10536.20
62150.60
83.05
6751.16
39823.53
3638.97
21465.44
.3B3&.
2.257-'
64
.600
105,0
29.65
.350
34.18
53.3
.99
316.4
.42
30.0
.700
16.1
6.4
1.5
76.0
30.83
26.98
.850
.006
69.5
21
-0.00
29.65
89.3
29
1.0
1.7
97.0
3719.50
6569.10
56.59
3744.88
8627.56
2231.09
5140.06
.222^
.512k/
39
.600
120.0
29.65
.319
37.53
54.4
1.09
370.0
.50
31.4
.686
IB. 2
5.1
5.5
71.2
31.12
27.00
.850
.006
94.8
24
-0.00
29.65
91.5
29
.9
1.7
99.4
6043.60
12969.50
53.40
5553.14
11916.98
3020.04
6480.97
•308t/
.661^
14
_a/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8,
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
63
-------
TABLE A-10 (Concluded)
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
(METRIC RESULTS)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF HUN
UNITS 13 U
12-08-75 12-08-75
DN
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VM
VWM
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MUD
MW
CP
DPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
QSM
QAM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOLt DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOLt DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOLt DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOLt DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSUREt ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATEt DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTD CN
PART, LOAO-TTLtSTD CN
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTK CN
PART. LOAD-TTLtSTK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PAKTIC EM1S-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
.600
25.0
29. 35
.180
5,62
44.8
.16
52.5
.07
30.1
.699
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.52
.850
.004
158.3
5
-0.00
29.35
85.4
29
.7
1.6
89.7
1577.80
2566,30
38.52
9601.92
15617.58
4493.69
7309.01
.428£/
.6 95 */
-11
.600
70.0
29.35
.207
16.41
48.0
.46
176.0
.24
33.2
.668
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.10
.850
.004
145.3
14
-0.00
29.35
79,3
29
.7
1,5
101,7
6856.70
10048.90
31.75
14383.35
21073.51
6631,29
9715.72
.586^7
.858^
-11
£/ Per stack; to obtain total, multiply by 1.67.
b_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
64
-------
TABLE A-11
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (PARTICIPATE)
Ul
NAME DESCRIPTION
HATE OF RUN
UNITS I 3 5
12-02-75 12-03-75 12-04-75
VMSTD VOL DRY GA.S-STD COND
PMOS
TS
OS
OA
PERI
PART
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PART
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE, DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
ICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAO-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC F.MIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
DSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
DSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
11.15
11.6
5P.O
11,310£/
21,60l£/
76.7
93.53
25.5
150.5
4?
66
94.0
64.61
30.5
158.3
41
71
99.5
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
786.70
1.08703
.97224
180
2162.50
.35606
.22560
.13—'
3178.70
.75769
.44224
.27—
955.70
1.32054
1.18110
219
17.60
4855.10
.79940
.50651
55.46
a/ Based on nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
9264.70
2.20837
1.28895
65.69
-------
TABLE A-ll (Continued)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (PARTICULATE)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS
TS
OS
OA
PERI
PART
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PART
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE. DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULAR WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
ICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC LMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
UNITS
DSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
7
12-05-75
55.00
35.0
164.8
33
62
104.6
10536.20
2.95024
1.59022
.84£/
62150.60
17.40280
9.38035
83.05
9
12-06-75
35.00
30.0
157.1
35
59
97.0
3719.50
1.63650
.97498 ,
.49E/
8569.10
3.77023
2.24620
56.59
11
12-07-75
38.35
31.4
202.7
33
60
99.4
6043.60
2.42671
1.31975
.68£/
12969.50
5.20770
2.83217
1.46£/
53.40
aj Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
TABLE A-11 (Concluded)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (PARTICIPATE)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS
TS
QS
QA
PERI
PART
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATEt DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL' STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL'»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
UNITS
DSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
13
12-08-75
5.79
30.1
317.0
26
56
89.7
1577.80
4.19602
1.96373
.94£/
14
12-08-75
16.80
33.2
293.6
24
52
101.7
6858.70
6.28550
2.89786
1.29k/
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAO-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
2566.30
6.82485
3.19402
1.53£/
38.52
10048.90
9.20908
4.24575
1.89k/
31.75
a/ Per stack; to obtain total, multiply by 1.67.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
TABLE A-12
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS (PARTICULATE)
oo
NAME
VMSTM
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
PARTI
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PARTI
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE* ORY»STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
CULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
CULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART, LOAO-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAO-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINC3ER CATCH
UNITS
NCM
OEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
1
12-02-75
.316
11.6
11.1 ,
547£/
6122/
76.7
67
786.70
2487.49
2224.02
82
955.70
3021.85
2702.75
99
17.68
3
12-03-75
2.649
25.5
65.8
1.2
1.9
94.0
67
2162.50
814.79
516.25
..058k/
4855.10
1829.31
1159.06
.13li/
55.46
5
12-04-75
1.B29
30.5
70.1
1.2
2.0
99.5
42
3170.70
1733.85
1011.99
,12lW
9264.70
5053.51
2949.56
.354^7
65.69
a/ Nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
-------
TABLE A-12 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS (PARTICULATE)
NAME DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STO COND NCM
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
TSM AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.C
QSM STK FLOWRATE* DRY.STD CN NM3/MIN
QAM ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE M3/MIN
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC
EA PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PART
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PART
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAO-PTL.STO CN
PART. LOAO-PTL»STK CN
PARTIC FMIS-PARTIAL
ICULATF.S — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTLfSTD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
PARTIC F.MIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
7
12-05-75
1.557
35.0
73.8
.9
1.8
104.6
64
10536.20
6751.16
3638.97
.383£/
62150.60
39823.53
21465.44
2.257£/
83.05
9
12-06-75
.991
30.0
69.5
1.0
1.7
97.0
39
3719.50
3744.88
2231.09
.2 22^7
8569.10
8627.56
5140.06
.512k/
56.59
11
12-07-75
1.086
31.4
94.8
.9
1.7
99.4
14
6043.60
5553.14
3020.04
.308£/
12969.50
11916.98
6480.97
.661*/
53.40
a/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
•-J
o
TABLE A-12 (Concluded)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS (PARTICULATE)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
PART
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATEt DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTD CN
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
UNITS
NCM
DEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
13
12-08-75
.164
30.1
158.3
.7
1.6
89.7
-11
1577.80
9601.92
4493.69
,428^/
14
12-08-75
.476
33.2
145.3
.7
1.5
101.7
-11
6858.70
14383.35
6631.29
.586^'
PARTICULATES — TOTAL* CATCH
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTU»STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
2566.30
15617.58
7309.01
.695£/
38.52
10046.90
21073.51
9715.72
.858^'
31.75
a/ Per stack; to obtain total, multiply by 1.67.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
APPENDIX B
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
71
-------
EXAMPLE PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
ro
1. VOLUME OF OPY GAS SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS (1)
17.71*VM»(PB + PM/13.6)
VMSTD =
- - —- J-M + 460. .... . _
17.71* 57.24*(29.25* .412/13.6)
= ^- = 55.00 DSCF
79.8*460.
.VMSTM =_. VMSTO^O.028317= 55.00*0.028317= 1.56 DNM3
2. VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VWV = 0.0474*V*' = -0.0474*-624.7 = 29.61 SCF
VWK = VWV«0.028317 = 29.611*0.028317 = .8385 NM3
3. PERCENT MOISTURE IN STACK GAS
100.*VWV 100.« 29.61
PMOS = — •-— s.... =. 35.0 PERCENT
VMSTD*VWV 55.00* 29.61
-------
4. MOLE FRACTION OF DRY STACK GAS
MD
1GO.-PMOS
»«VM«»«WM«»«BM««^
...'. 400.
100.- 35.0
lflV«»«W^^«»«»^«»^«»«
100.
.650
CO
5. .AVERAGE MOLECULAR- WEIGHT OF-DRY STACK GAS
MWD = (PC02 « 44/100) + (P02 * 32/100)
*-(PN2+PCO.-..« 28/100-)
(17.2 * 44/100) * ( 9.2 « 32/100)
+473.6 * 28/100)
6. MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS
31.12
MM = MrtD«MD * 18»(1-MD>
= 31.1* ,.650 > 18«(1- .650)
26.53
-------
7. STACK GAS VELOCITY AT STACK CONDITIONS
= 5129*CP*ASQRT(DPS*(TS+460))*
SORT(1/(PS*MW))
= 5129* .850 * 1.977
"SORT(1/129.25* 26.53))
VSM = VS*0.3048 a
309*0.3048
309 FPM
94 METERS/MIN
6. STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW AT STANDARD CONDITIONS* DRY BASIS
0.123*VS»AS»MO*PS
OS =
. — —. T-S*460- -- -
0.123« 309* 29» .650*29.25
. ir. ^. T*** ™^** •^*^»."*^«»*»^^^«»^«"^i^«p«*^^^^«w^"»^«»^^..
164.8 +460
= 33 DSCFM
QSM = QS*0.028317 = 33«0.028317 = 1 NM3/MIN
9. STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW AT STACK CONDITIONS
OS * (TS+460)
QA =
17..71-»-.P-S •» -MO -
33
-------
10. PERCENT -ISOKINE.TIC
01
1D32
-------
13.
PAKTICULATE LOADING — PROBE* CYCLONE* AND FILTER
-IAT--STACK CONDITIONS)
CAT
17.71*CAN*PS»MD
TS+460
- 17,71* a.2390*29.25* -,650
164.8+460
CATM = CAT*2288.34 = 1.20683»2288.34 = 2761.64 MG/M3
= 1.20683 GR/ACF
14. PAP-TICULATE LOADING — TOTAL
(AT STACK CONDITIONS)
CAU
= 7.25071 GR/ACF
17.71*CAO*PS«MD
TS+460
_.. -17,71«13^4518#29.25*. .650
164.8+460
CAUM = CAU*2288.34 = 7.25071*2288.34 * 16592.09 MG/M3
15. PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE
— PR08E» CYCLONE, AND FILTER
CAW = 0.00857»CAN»OS
= 0.00857« 2.2390» 33
CAWM = CAW*0.45359 = ,64«0.45359
.64 LH/HH
.?9 KG/HP
-------
16. PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE
~ TOTAL
CAX «* 0.00857*CAO*QS
= 0.00857* 13.4518* 33
CAXM = CAX*0.45359 = 3.85*0.45359
17. PERCENT EXCESS AIR AT SAMPLING POINT
EA
100. « (P02-0.5*PCO)
0.264«PN2-P02+0.5»PCO
100. M 9.2-0.5* 4.1)
0.264*69.5- 9.2*0.5* 4.1
3.B5 LR/HR
1.74 KG/HR
63.9 PERCENT
(1) STANDARD CONDITIONS- AT 70 DEO F (21.1 DEG C), 29.92 IN HG (760 MM HG)
-------
APPENDIX C
RESULTS OE; ANALYSIS - COMPUTER COMPUTATIONS
(TOTAL ORGANIC)
78
-------
TABLE C-l
ORGANIC DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
vo
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20
TEMP PRES VAC CONO
(06.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML)
60.0 39.26 0.00 31.0 554.90 646.70
UN- 1
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(M6)
DATE-
PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
12-02-75
STACK IN1T
AREA VOL
(FT2) (DCF)
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
601.61 9.2 11.0 1.9
,850
PORT-
POINT
1
D
D
D
D
D
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
802.84
804.15
806.04
808.02
810.29
812.96
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.002
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
• 150
.250
.400
.450
.550
.850
TEMP
IN
(D.F) -(
62.0
64.0
67.0
72.0
80.0
85.0
TEMP
OUT
;D.F)
62.0
64.0
64.0
64.0
68.0
69.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.5
4.0
5.5
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
62.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T OIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
150.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
-------
TABLE C-2
ORGANIC DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
DATE- 12-03-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20 PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC COND WT-PTL
(D6.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML) (MO)
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) (FT2) (DCF)
40.0 29.31 0.00 675.2 1574.60 3367.30
PERC PERC PERC PI TOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
• 20 813.01 9.2 11.0 1.9 .8
-------
00
TABLE C-2 (Continued)
RUN- 3 DATE- 12-03-75
PORT-
POINT
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
842.42
844.38
846.64
848.58
850.39
852.26
854.17
856.33
858.82
860*99
863.59
866.03
868.03
870,31
872.79
875.34
878.03
880.37
882.08
884.03
886.24
888.17
889.99
891.61
DELTA
P
I.H20) (
.007
.009
.009
.006
.006
.008
.008
.009
.009
.011
.011
.008
.008
.014
.014
.011
.011
.006
.006
.008
.008
.006
.006
.005
DELTA
H
I.H20)
.400
.500
.550
.500
.400
.450
.400
.500
.700
.700
.750
.700
.600
.750
.700
.750
.800
.800
,550
,550
.650
.550
.450
.400
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
80.0
85.0
87.0
65.0
70.0
80.0
83.0
81.0
87.0
76.0
82.0
95.0
94.0
98.0
100.0
82.0
89.0
98.0
98.0
98.0
100.0
86.0
90.0
95,0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
65.0
66.0
68.0
66.0
66.0
67.0
68.0
70.0
72.0
73.0
74.0
75.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
78.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
81. 0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HQ)
6.5
8.0
9.0
11.0
11.0
14.0
15.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.5
7.5
8.0
10.0
14.0
6.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
10.0
8.0
8.0
10.0
STACK S.GEL
TEMP TEMP
-------
TABLE C-2 (Concluded)
RUN-
DATE- 12-03-75
oo
PORT- SAMP METER DELTA
POINT TIME VOL P
(MIN) (DCF) (I.H20) (
7 1 5.00 893.37 .005
7 1 5.00 894.87 .004
7 1 5.00 896.38 .004
8 1 5.00 898.77 .011
8 1 5.00 901.12 .011
8 1 5.00 903.36 .008
8 1 5.00 905.49 .008
8 1 5.00 907.40 .007
8 1 5.00 909.35 .007
DELTA TEMP TEMP TRAIN STACK S.GEL PROBE
H IN OUT VAC TEMP TEMP T DIA VEL
I.H20) (D.F) (D.F) II. HG) (D.F) (O.F) (IN) (FPM)
.400 97.0 83.0 11.0 155.0 .600 280.0
.300 100.0 84.0 12. 0 155.0 .600 250.0
.300 98.0 84.0 13.0 155.0 .600 250.0
.650 82.0 81.0 6.0 165.0 .600 400.0 £&»
.650 87.0 82.0 6.5 165.0 .600 400.0 J™!
.550 95.0 82.0 7.0 160.0 .600 350.0 SQI
ecn ax. t\ ay n 7 « n IftOaO .600 350.0 maim.
.550 96.0 oc.O i.u lou.w .w«w ~> nwBB^8l
.400 99.0 82.0 7.0 160.0 55.0 .600 320.0 g^^i
* "r U U ^y»v ^**-wv _,»— -1 -^ rt n ri7u»u<.jLfti«i««MH
.400 99.0 82.0 7.0 160.0 .600 320.0 m&BBt
™ 9
-------
TABLE C-3
ORGANIC DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
oo
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
50.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
3 1
3 1
3 1
3 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.31
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
911.14
912.85
914.55
916.25
918.28
920.33
922.34
924.53
926.59
928.65
930.73
932.78
934.63
936.39
938.42
940.55
RUt»- 5
H?0 PARTIC
COND WT-PTL
(ML)
598.0
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.006
.006
.006
.006
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.006
.006
.008
.008
(MG)
2515.50
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.450
.400
.400
.350
.550
.550
.500
.600
.550
.500
.500
.500
.400
.400
.500
.500
DATE- 12-04-75
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL AREA
(MG) (FT2)
6815
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
54.0
58.0
66.0
68.0
66.0
72.0
83.0
86.0
75.0
80.0
90.0
92.0
79.0
83.0
90.0
93.0
.40
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
56.0
56.0
56.0
57.0
62.0
62.0
65.0
65.0
70.0
72.0
74.0
74.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
79.0
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
5.5
5.5
6.0
8.0
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.0
11.0
12.0
12.0
5.0
5.0
6.0
6.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
909.35
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
155.0
155.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
145.0
145.0
155.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
155.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
7.3 15.
0 2.
9 .850
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T
DIA
(D.F) (IN)
•
«
55.0 ,
.
.
•
.
.
.
.
65.0 .
•
.
•
65.0 .
•
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
300.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
-------
TABLE C-3 (Concluded)
RUN-
DATE- 12-04-75
00
-p-
PORT-
POINT
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
6
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
9*2.89
945.26
947.63
950.01
952.39
954.77
957.19
959.60
961.40
963.18
964.95
966.73
969.13
971.54
973.93
976.43
DELTA
P
(I.H20)
.011
.011
• Oil
.011
.011
.011
.011
.011
.006
.006
.006
.006
.011
• Oil
.011
.011
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.700
.700
.650
.650
.700
.650
.700
.700
.500
.400
.350
.300
.650
.650
.650
.650
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
73.0
79.0
91.0
95.0
83.0
90.0
100.0
103.0
86.0
89.0
95.0
97.0
90.0
96.0
104.0
108.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
65.0
75.0
76.0
77.0
80.0
81.0
83.0
83.0
84.0
85.0
86.0
87.0
86.0
88.0
88.0
90,0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
11.5
12.0
5.0
5.0
5.5
6.5
10.0
10.5
11.5
12.0
STACK S.GEL
TEMP TEMP
(D.F) (D.F)
160.0
155.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
165.0
160.0
165.0
165.0
165.0 65.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
160.0
160.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
-------
TABLE C-4
ORGANIC DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
OATE- 12-05-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20 PART 1C
TEMP PKES VAC COND WT-PTL
(OG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML) (MG)
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) (FT?) (OCF)
50.0 29.25 0.00 624.7 7996.00 48040.40
PERC PERC PFRC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
.20 977.30 9.2 17.2 4.1 .850
oo
PORT-
POI
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
NT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
978.81
980.18
901.61
983.08
984.80
986,52
988.47
990.56
992.31
994.20
995.95
997.72
999.19
1000.66
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.004
.004
.004
.006
.006
.008
.008
.006
.006
.006
.006
.004
.004
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.300
.250
.250
.250
.350
.300
.400
.500
.350
.450
.400
.400
.300
.250
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
64.0
6fl.O
72.0
74.0
72.0
77.0
85.0
88.0
78.0
81.0
90.0
92.0
80.0
82.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
66.0
67.0
67.0
68.0
70.0
71.0
73.0
74.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
79.0
HO.O
80.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
8.0
8.5
10.0
11.0
12.0
12.0
4.0
5.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
155.0
150.0
150.0
155.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
165.0
160.0
165.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
60.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
65.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
250.0
250.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
250.0
250.0
-------
oo
TABLE C-4 (Concluded)
RUM- 7 DATE- 12-05-75
PORT-
POINT
3
3
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(OCF) (]
1002.10
1003.49
1005.43
1007.39
1009.53
1011.61
1013.61
1015.64
1017.64
1019.41
1021.70
1023.97
1026.25
1028.50
1029.96
1031.42
1032.96
1034.54
DELTA
P
I.H20) (
.004
.004
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.007
.007
.010
.010
.010
.010
.004
.004
.005
.005
DELTA
H
I.H20)
.250
.250
.450
.450
.550
.550
.550
.500
.450
.350
.700
.700
.650
.650
.400
.400
.300
.300
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
88.0
90.0
70.0
74.0
84.0
87.0
77.0
83.0
92.0
94.0
84.0
92.0
98.0
103.0
80.0
81.0
86.0
89.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
81.0
82.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
75.0
77.0
78.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
82.0
83.0
84.0
80.0
81.0
82.0
81.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I. HO)
5.0
6.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
11.0
5.0
9.0
10.0
9.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.5
5.0
9.0
9.0
9,0
STACK S.GEL
TEMP TEMP
(D.F) (O.F)
160.0 60.0
160.0
160.0
165.0
165.0
170.0
170.0
165.0
160.0
165.0
185.0
185.0
190.0
185.0
180.0
175.0
175.0
175.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
250.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
325.0
325.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
400.0
250.0
250.0
275.0
275.0
-------
TABLE G-5
ORGANIC^DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
DATE- 12-06-75
oo
ATMOS
TEMP
DG.F)
40.0
PORT-
POINT
4 1
4 1
4 1
3 1
3 1
3 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
6 1
6 1
6 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.65
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
U.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
36.12
37.68
39.44
41.12
42.73
44.51
46.19
47.87
49.55
50.96
52.36
53.76
H?0
COND
(ML)
316.4
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.004
.004
.004
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG)
2855.50
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.300
.350
.400
.400
.400
.400
.400
.400
.350
.250
.250
.250
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) (FT2)
6491
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
40.0
43.0
49.0
4fl.O
51.0
57.0
51.0
55.0
60.0
54.0
58.0
60.0
.20
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
40.0
41.0
42.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
50.0
50.0
51.0
52.0
52.0
53.0
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
4.0
5.0
6.5
8.0
8.0
9.0
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.0
10.5
11.0
(DCF)
34.54
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
160.0
160.0
145.0
145.0
145.0
150.0
155.0
155.0
150.0
155.0
155.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
6.4 16.1 1
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.5 .850
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
250.0
250.0
250.0
-------
TABLE C-5 (Concluded)
RUN- 9 DATE- 12-06-75
oo
oo
PORT-
POINT
7
7
7
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
55.53
57.10
58.69
60. 44
62.05
63.70
65.39
67.09
68.72
DELTA
P
(I.H20)
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
ELTA
H
H20)
.400
.350
.300
.400
.350
.350
.350
.350
.350
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
55.0
59.0
63.0
54.0
58.0
63.0
60.0
64.0
68.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
54.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
56.0
56.0
56.0
56.0
58.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
4.0
5.0
7.5
13.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
12.5
13.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
170.0
170.0
155.0
155.0
160.0
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
-------
TABLE C-6
ORGANIC DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUM- 11
PATF.- 12-07-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20 PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC CONO WT-PTL
(DG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML) (MG)
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL AREA
(MG) (FT2)
40.0 29,65 0.00 370.0 4777.90 8821.20
,20
INIT PERC PERC PERC PITOT
VOL 02 C02 CO TUBE
(DCF) DRY DRY DRY COEF
70.83 5.1 18.2 5.5 .850
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (1
72.13
73.50
74.86
76.66
78.44
80.25
81.87
83.43
84.83
86.49
88.34
90.09
DELTA
P
:.H20) (
• 004
.004
.004
.008
.008
.008
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
.006
DELTA
H
I.H20)
.250
.250
.250
.400
.400
.400
.300
.300
.300
.350
.400
.400
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
44.0
47.0
51.0
48.0
53.0
59.0
52.0
58.0
62.0
52.0
57.0
63.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
45.0
45.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
47.0
48.0
49.0
50.0
50.0
51.0
51.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I»HG)
3.0
4.0
6.0
9.0
9.0
9.5
9.5
11.0
13.5
3.0
3.0
4.0
STACK S.GEL
TEMP TEMP
(D.F) (D.F)
170.0
170.0
170.0
200.0
200.0
205.0 56.0
170.0
160.0
160.0
170.0
185.0 50.0
190.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
250.0
250.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
-------
TABLE C-6 (Concluded)
RUN- 11 PATE.- 12-07-75
PORT-
POINT
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5*00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
-------
TABLE C-7
ORGANIC DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUM- 13
OATK- 12-08-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H?0 PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC CONO WT-PTL
(06.F) (J.HG) (I.H20) (ML) (MO)
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MO) (FT2) (DCF)
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBF.
DRY DRY DRY COEF
40.0 29.35 0.00 52.5- 1013.70 1698.20 ,20 111.14 1.1 22.3 6.7 .850
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
112.45
113.52
115.01
116.04
116.76
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.005
.005
.005
.003
.003
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.250
.200
.300
.100
.050
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
42.0
45.0
50.0
42.0
45.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
45.0
45.0
45.0
44.0
45.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I. HO)
9.0
14.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
STACK S.GEL
TEMP TEMP
(D.F) (D.F)
320.0
325.0
290.0
320.0
330.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
300.0
250.0
250.0
-------
TABLE C-8
ORGANIC DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 14
HATE- 12-08-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20 PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC COND WT-PTL
(DG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML)- (MG)
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) (FT2) (DCF)
40.0 29.35 0.00 176.0 4911.40 6965.90
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 CO? CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
.20 116.76 1.1 22.3 6.7 .850
NJ
PORT-
POINT
1
1
2
2
4
4
3
3
5
5
6
6
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) 1
118.09
119.36
120.21
120.98
122.15
123.22
124.27
125.27
126.59
127.71
129.27
130.65
132.00
133.17
DELTA DELTA TEMP TEMP TRAIN STACK S.GEL PROBE
P H IN OUT VAC TEMP TEMP T DIA
(DCF) (I.H20) (UH20) (D.F) (D.F) (I.HG) (D.F) (D.F) (IN)
.005
.005
.002
.002
.003
.003
.003
.002
.006
.006
.004
.004
.004
.004
.200
.200
.100
.100
.200
.200
.200
.150
.250
.150
.300
.300
.300
.250
43.0
46.0
46.0
47.0
50.0
53.0
45.0
47.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
54.0
52.0
55.0
45.0
46.0
46.0
47.0
48.0
48.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
48*0
49.0
50.0
2.5
5.0
7.0
12.0
4.0
10.0
4.0
11.0
8.0
8.0
4.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
325. 0
320.0
325.0
330.0
235.0
245.0
200.0
215.0
335.0
335.0
295.0
325.0
300.0
325.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
300.0
200.0
200.0
220.0
220.0
200.0
200.0
340.0
340.0
2BO.O
280.0
280.0
280.0
-------
TABLE C-9
ORGANIC EMISSION DATA
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS .1..... 3 5
12-02-75 12-03-75 12-04-75
DN
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD
VW
VWV
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
VS
AS
QS
QA
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY G6S-STD COND
TOTAL H?0 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL« DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL t DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL » DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR *T-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TU6E COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE* DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
WIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
IN.H20
DEG.F
IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
IN2
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
.600
30.0
.29.26
.442
11.35
68. 4
11.15
31.0
.1,47
11.6
.884
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
28.72
.850
,007
52.0
6
-0.00
29.26
275a/
11,310^'
19,326*/
21,60l£/
76.7
554.90
646.70
14.20
.76674
.89358
.68577
.79922
127
" 149
67
.600
240.0
..29.31
.506
96.34
75.5
93.53
675.2
32.00
25.5
.745
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.04
.850
.008
150.5
48
-0.00
29.31
332
29
42
66
94.0
1574.60
3367.30
53.24
.25926
.55443
.16427
.35129,
.09E/
.20k/
67
.600
160.0
29.31
.539
67.08
79.8
64.61
598.0
2£.35
30.5
.695
15.0
7.3
2.9
76.8
30.69
26.82
.850
.008
158.3
32
-0.00
29.31
353
29
41
71
99.5
2515.50
6815.40
63.09
.59961
1.62455
.34997
.94819
.2l£'
.57k/
42
a/ Nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
93
-------
TABLE C-9 (Continued)
NAME
DN
TT
P8
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD-.
V«
VWV
PMOS ..
MO
PC02
P.02-. . .
PCO
PN2
M.WD -
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST .
PS
VS
AS
QS
QA
PERI ...
MF
MT
.1C-... -
CAN
CAO
CAT . .
CAU
CAW
CAX .. . .
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
PROBE T i P -o i A METER -
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
.AV.G ORIFICE.. PRES. .DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL- D&Y..-GAS--STD-CONO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT .MUlSTURE. BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
..PERCENT. ...02- BY ..VOL* DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL* DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR- KT-.DRY. STK. GAS
MOLECULAR *T-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK -VELXJCI-I-Y... HEAD •
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK- AREA
STK FLOWRATE. DRY»STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT -ISOK.INE-TI.C- . .. ...
PARTICULATE teT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC -iMPlNuER-CAICH- ~~
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN
.P.AKT..-LOAD.-P~TL-».STK~CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
P. ART-I C. EM.LS---TQ T AJ -
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
-IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
. .
IN.H20
DEG.F
. -IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
- IN2
— A t ' C»
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF-
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR ...
7
12-05-75
.600
160.0
29.25
.412
57.24
79,8
55.00
624.7
29.61
35.0
.650
17.2
9.2
4.1
69.5
31.12
26.53
.850
:..... .006
164.8
32
-0.00
29.25
309
29
33
62
-104.6
7996.00
48040.40
.-.-- -83.36
2.23896
13.45180
1.20683
7.25071
.64*
3.85-
64
11
12-06-75 12-07-75
.600
105.0
29.65
.350
34.18
53.3
-35.00
316.4
15.00
30.0
.700
16.1
- - 6.4
1.5
76.0
30.83
26.98
.850
.006-
157.1
21
-0.00
29.65
293
29
35
59
97-.0 -
2855.50
6491.20
. - 56.4)1-
1.25636
2.85599
.74851 -
1.70152
oob/
K/
Qcb/..
-••• •- .oj—
39
.600
120.0
29.65
,319
37.53
54.4
- 38.35
370.0
17.54
--31.4
.686
18.2
5,1
5.5
71.2
31.12
27.00
.850
.006
202.7
24
-0.00
29.65
300
29
33
60
99.4
4777.90
8821,20
-45.84.
1.91649
3.54201
-1.04336
1.92630
a/
-.99i
14
_a/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
94
-------
TABLE C-9 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
1.1
14
12-08-75 12-08-75
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD
VW
VWV
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
VS
AS
QS
QA
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUHE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
OEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
IM.H20
DEG.F
IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
IN2
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
L8/HR
LB/HR
,600
25.0
29.35
.180
5.62
44.8
5.79
52.5
2.49
30.1
.699
22.3
1*1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.52
.850
.004
317.0
5
-0.00
29.35
280
29
26
56
89.7
1013.70
1698.20
40.31
2.69585
4.51621
1.26165
2.11358 .
Ma/
• ol—
l.Oll/
-11
.600
70.0
29.35
.207
16.41
48.0
16.80
176.0
8.34
33.2
.668
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.10
.850
.004
293.6
14
-0.00
29.35
260
29
2*
52
101.7
4911.40
6965.90
29.49
4.50094
6.38374
2.07511
2.94315
.92^
1.31^
-11
aj Per stack; to obtain total, multiply by 1.67.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
95
-------
TABLE C-10
ORGANIC EMISSION DATA
(METRIC RESULTS)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
12-02-.7S 12-03-75 .12-0.4-J5
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VW
VWM
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MUD
MW
CP
DPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
QSM
QAM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H2C COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR KT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLO*RATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL>STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTUSTK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
MJ.N
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
NCM
.. .ML ...
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
"M3/MIN "~
KG
MG
MG/NM3
"MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
•- - -
.600
... 3.0.0
29.26
.442
.. ...11,35
68.4
.32
3U.Q._
.04
11.6
.884
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
28.72
.850
.007
11.1
6
-0.00
29.26
83.8 .
11,310£/
5 47 a/
612a/™
76.7
554.90
646.70
14.20
1754.55
2044.82
1569.28
1828.89
™ 58
67
67
.600
240.0
29.31
.506
96.34
75.5
2.65
6J5,2.
.91
25.5
.745
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.04
.850
.008
65.8
48
-0.00
29.31
101.2
29
1.2
1.9
94.0
1574.60
3367.30
53.24
593.28
1268.73
375.90
803.87,
.042^
.09Lk/
67
.600
160.0
29.31
.539
67.08
79.8
1.03
596.0
.80
30.5
,6.95
15.0
7.3
2.9
74.8"
30.69
26.82
.850
.008
70.1
32
-0.00
29.31
107.7
29
1.2
2.0
99.5
2515.50
6615.40
63.09
1372.10
3717.52
800.85
2169.79
,096k/
.260k/
42
a./ Nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8,
96
-------
TABLE C-10 (Continued)
NAME
DN
TT
PS
PM
VM
TM ..
VMSTM
Vw
VWM
PMOS
MO
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWO
MW
CP
DPS
TSM
.NP .. .
PST
PS
.VSM ... .
AS
QSM
QAM . .
PERI
MF
..MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CArfM..
CAXM
EA
-DESCfilPT-ION -. - . ...
DATE OF RUM
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIw.F. OF RUN
BAROMETRIC. PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
. _AV.G- GAS-METER -TEMP _ ___
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H2G .VAPQP-STD- COND-
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT..C02 BY-VOL, -DRY-
PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT .N2- 8Y-VOL-* DRY-
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
....P1TO-T-..TUBE.-COEF.F4C1ENT.-.'—
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
.. .NET SAMPLING. PO-INTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
--AV.G -STACK... &AS-VE-L-OCITY
STACK A*EA
STK FLOtfRATEt DRY,STD CN
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
-DEG,F -
NCM
ML
NM3
—
.
IM.H20
DEG.C
..._.-. - .
IN.HG
IN.HG
.-_M/M.IN
IN2
NM3/MIN
. ACTUAL. 5T.ACK~.F.LO.»iRAT£ M3/MIN -
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PAHTICULATE- WT-TOTAL - -
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN
PART.. -LOADf.TTUSTD.-CN
PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CN
PART. LOAO-TTL»STK CN
.PARTIC. . EMI S -PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
MG
MG- -
MG/NM3
-MG/NM-3 -
MG/M3
MG/M3
_K.G/HR. . .
-------
TABLE C-10 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
13
14
12-58-75 .12-08-75.
DN
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTH
VW
VWM
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MHD
MW
CP
DPS
TSH
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
QSM
QAM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAHM
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STO COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOLt DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLO*RATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL*STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
KIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
M5/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
.600
._25.»0
29.35
• 180
5.62..
•+4.6
.16
52.5
.07
30.1
_ ,699
22,3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.52
.850
,004
158.3
5
-0.00
29.35
85.4
29
.7
1,6
89.7
1013.70
1698.20
40.31
6169.01
10334.63
2887.09
4836.60
.275*/
.460i/
-_11 .
.600
„... 70.0
29.35
.207
16.41
48.0
.48
176.0
.24
33.2
,668
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.10
.850
.004
145.3
14
-0.00
29.35
79.3
29
.7
1,5
101.7
4911.40
6965.90
29.49
10299.68
14608.16
4748.56
6734.94
.42 O^/
.595^
-11
a/ Per stack; to obtain total, multiply by 1.67.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
98
-------
TABLE C-ll
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (ORGANIC)
vo
NAME
VMSTD
PMOS
TS
OS
QA
PERI
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
UNITS
OSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
I
12-02-75
11.15
11.6
52,0
ii,3io*/
21,601*'
76.7
3
12-03-75
93.53
25.5
150.5
42
66
94.0
5
12-04-75
64.61
30,5
158.3
41
71
99.5
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PARTI
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAU
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
CULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL:,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MO
OR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
554.90
.76674
.68577
180
646.70
.89358
.79922
219
14.20
1574.60
.25926
.16427 .
.09^/
3367.30
.55443
.35129
.2(£'
53.24
2515,50
,59961
.34997
.21^
6815,40
1,62455
.94819
.57^
63.09
aj Nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
-------
TABLE C-ll (Continued)
o
o
NAME
VMSTD
PMOS
TS
QS
OA
PERI
PARTI
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PARTI
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF HUM
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATEt DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
CULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAO-PTL«STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL .
CULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
UNITS
DSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
l.B/HR
7
12-05-75
55.00
35.0
164.8
33
62
104.6
7996.00
2.23896
1.20683
.64£/
48040.40
13.45180
7.25071
3.85*'
03.36
9
12-06-75
35.00
30.0
157.1
35
59
97.0
2855.50
1.25636
.74851
.38k/
6491.20
2.85599
1.70152
.85k/
56.01
11
12-07-75
38.35
31.4
202.7
33
60
99.4
4777.90
1.91849
1.04336 ,
.54£/
8821.20
3.54201
1.92630 ,
.99^
45.84
aj Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
b_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
TABLE C-ll (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
VMSTD
PMOS
TS
QS
QA
PERI
VOL DRY G/VS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE* DRY»STD CM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
DSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PARTI
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAO-PTL.STD CN
PART. LOAO-PTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
CULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MO
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
13
12-08-75
5.79
30.1
317.0
26
56
89.7
1013.70
2.69585
1.26165
.6l£/
1698.20
4.51621
2.11358 ,
14
12-08-75
16.80
33.2
293.6
24
5?
101.7
4911.40
4.50094
2.07511 ,
.92k/
6965.90
6.38374
2.94315 ,
40.31
29.49
aj Per stack; to obtain total, multiply by 1.67.
b_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7,
-------
TABLE C-12
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS (ORGANIC)
o
ro
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
PART
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PART
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE* DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATK
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAO-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTK CN
PARTIC F:MIS-PARTIAL
ICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTLtSTK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
NCM
DEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MO/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
1 3 5
12-02-75 12-03-75 12-04-75
.316
11.6
11.1 .
547£/
612^'
76.7
67
2.649
25.5
65.fi
1.2
1.9
94.0
67
1.029
30.5
70.1
1.2
2.0
99.5
42
554.90
1754.55
1569.28
58
1574.60 2515,50
593.28 1372.10
375.90 800.85
.042k/ .096k/
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
646.70
2044.82
1828.89
67
14.20
3367.30
1268.73
803.87
.09lk/
53.24
6815.40
3717.52
2169.79
• £. O^J—
63.09
a/ Nominal 10-ft (120 in.) diameter stack.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
-------
TABLE G-12 (Continued)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUM
UNITS 7 9 11
12-05-75 12-06-75 12-07-75
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
PART
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PART
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATEt ORY«STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
ICULATE.S — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULAR WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAO-PTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
ICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULAR WT-TOTAL
PART, LOAD-TTL»STD CN
PART. LOAU-TTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
NCM
DEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
1.557
35.0
73.8
.9
1.8
104.6
64
7996.00
5123.51
2761.64
.29Q£
48040.40
30782.30
16592.09
1.744*'
83.36
.991
30.0
69.5
1.0
1.7
97.0
39
2855.50
2874.98
1712.83
.1702/
6491.20
6535.49
3893.66
.387^
56.01
4777.90
4390.16
2387.56
.243-'
8821.20
8105.33
4409.03
45.84
aj Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
TABLE C-12 (Concluded)
NAME
VMSTM
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
NCM
VOL DRY GAS-STD CONO
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.C
STK FLOWRATE, DRYtSTD CN NM3/MIN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE M3/MIN
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
MF PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
CANM PART. LOAD-PTLfSTD CN
CATM PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CN
CAWM PARTIC FMIS-PARTIAL
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
MT PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
CAOM PART. LOAD-TTL«STD CN
CAUM PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
CAXM PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
1C PERC IMPINGF.R CATCH
MO
MO/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
13 14
12-08-75 12-08-75
,164
30.1
158.3
.7
1.6
89.7
-11
.476
33.2
145.3
.7
1.5
101.7
-11
1013.70 4911.40
6169.01 10299.68
2887.09 4748.56
.275£/
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
1698.20
10334.63
4836.60 .
.460*/
40.31
6965.90
14608.16
6734.94
.595^'
29.49
aj Per stack; to obtain total, multiply by 1,67.
b_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
APPENDIX D
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - COMPUTER COMPUTATIONS
(POLYCYCLIG ORGANIC MATERIALS)
105
-------
TABLE D-l
BENZ[V]PHENANTHRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F
40.0
)
PORT-
POINT
1
2
4
3
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.31
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
838.98
840.69
842.82
845.03
847.27
849.49
851.22
853.23
RUN- 2
H?0 PARTIC
COND WT-PTL
(ML)
109.8
DELTA
P
I.H20) i
.005
.006
.009
.009
.011
.011
.004
.008
(MG)
15.40*/
DELTA
H
1I.H20) (
.270
.400
.650
.700
.700
.650
.450
.550
DATE- 12-03-75
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL AREA
(MG) (
15
TEMP
IN
D.F)
43.0
49.0
53.0
58.0
62.0
64.0
65.0
65.0
.40£/
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
43.0
49.0
53.0
60.0
62.0
64.0
66.0
65.0
FT?)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
8.5
5.0
5.0
6.0
9.0
7.0
12.0
12.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
837.66
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
140.0
145.0
130.0
140.0
160.0
155.0
165.0
165.0
PERC PERC PFRC PITOT
02 CO? CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
9.2 11.0 1
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.9 .850
VEL
(FPM)
260.0
300.0
350.0
350.0
400.0
400.0
250.0
350.0
il x 10-3.
-------
TABLE D-2
BENZ[V]PHENANTHRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
50.0
PORT-
POINT
1
2
4
3
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.31
SAMP
TIME
( MI N )
5,00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (]
854.97
057.01
859.01
860.85
863.15
865.45
867.35
869.71
RUN- 4 DATE- 12-04-75
H?0 PARTIC PARTIC STACK
COND WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA
(ML) (MG) (MG) (FT2)
134.4 3.402/ 23.40£/ .20
DELTA DELTA TEMP TEMP TRAIN
p H IN OUT VAC
t.H20) (
.004
.008
.008
.007
.011
.011
.006
.011
I.H20)
.500
.600
.550
.500
.700
.700
.600
.700
(D.F)
64.0
58.0
61.0
64.0
68.0
72.0
73.0
75.0
(D.F)
66.0
60.0
61.0
64.0
68.0
72.0
73.0
75.0
(I.HG)
5.0
7.5
5.5
5.0
12.0
9.0
5.0
13.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
853.51
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
150.0
145.0
160.0
160.0
165.0
150.0
160.0
155.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBF
DRY DRY DRY COEF
7.3 15.0 2.9 .850
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T
(D.F) (
niA
IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
CFPM)
250.0
350.0
350.0
320.0
400.0
400.0
300.0
400.0
a/
-------
o
00
TABLE D-3
BENZ|V]PHENANTHRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
50.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
2 1
4 1
3 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.25
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
-0.00
METER
VOL.
(DCF) (
871.25
872.97
874.84
076.42
878.15
879.83
882.05
883.70
RUN- 6
H20 PARTIC
CONO WT-PTL
( ML )
154.8
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.006
.006
.004
.006
.006
.010
.006
(MG)
ll.OQi/
DELTA
H
(I.H20) (
.300
.350
.450
.300
.400
.400
.700
.400
DATE- 12-05-75
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) 1
11
TEMP
IN
D.F)
68.0
67.0
67.0
69.0
66.0
68.0
70.0
70.0
.00£/
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
70.0
67.0
67.0
69.0
67.0
68.0
70.0
70.0
[FT?)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
B.O
10.5
7.0
(DCF)
869.81
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
155.0
150.0
160.0
160.0
165.0
180.0
185.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
9.2 17.2 4
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
70.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.1 .850
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
300.0
300.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
400.0
300.0
»7 x 10-3.
-------
TABLE D-4
BENZ[c~]PHENANTHRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS ATMOS STACK
TEMP PRES VAC
(DG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML)
RUN-
H20
OND
ML)
8
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG)
DATE-
PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
12-06-75
STACK INIT
AREA VOL
(FT2) (DCF)
40.0
29.65 0.00 96.1
0.002.'
a/
19.80E'
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
.20 883.70 6.4 16.1 1.5 .850
PORT- SAMP METER OELTA DELTA TEMP TEMP TRAIN STACK 5.GEL PROBE
POINT TIME VOL P H IN OUT VAC TEMP TEMP T DIA VEL
(MIN) (OCF) (I.H20) (I.H20) (D.F) (D.F) (I.HG) (D.F) (D.F) (IN) (FPM)
.600 250.0
.600 300.0
.600 300.0
70.0 .600 250.0
.600 300.0
*600 300.0
.600 300.0
a/ Not detectable.
4
3
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
885.07
886.77
888.41
889.80
891.43
893.04
894.69
.004
.006
.006
.004
.006
.006
.006
.250
.400
.400
.250
.400
.400
.400
44.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
44.0
49.0
50.0
46.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
44.0
49.0
50.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.0
5.0
9.0
9.0
150.0
140.0
155.0
145.0
160.0
175.0
160.0
b/ x 10
-3
-------
TABLE D-5
BENZ[£]PHENANTHRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
40.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
4 1
3 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
2 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.65
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5*00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
896.12
898.14
899.48
901.06
902.40
903.95
905.49
906.78
RUM- 1 0
H20 PARTIC
COND
(ML)
168.0
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.010
.004
.006
.004
• 006
.005
.005
WT-PTL
(MG)
o.oo^/
DELTA
H
(I.HPO) (
.250
.650
.250
.300
.250
.300
.300
.200
HATE- 12-07-75
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL
(MG
10.3
TEMP
IN
D.F) (
42.0
41.0
41.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
)
;ok/
TEMP
OUT
D.F)
45.0
41.0
41.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
AREA
(FT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
11.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
894.80
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
180.0
205.0
165.0
175.0
175.0
185.0
215.0
335.0
PERC PERC PFRC PITOT
02
DRY
5.1 1
S.GEL
TEMP
(D.F)
50.0
60.0
70.0
C02
DRY
8.2
PROBE
T OIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
CO TUBE
DRY COEF
5.5 .850
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
400.0
250.0
300.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
a/ Not detectable.
b/ x 10-3.
-------
TABLE D-6
BENZ[V]PHENANTHRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(06. F)
40.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
2 1
4 1
3 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29. 3S
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
909.38
910.51
911.59
912.73
913.88
915.17
916.16
RUN- 12 DATE- 12-08-75
H20 PARTIC PARTIC STACK
COND
(Ml.)
83.0
OELTA
P
I.H20)
.005
.003
.003
.003
.004
.004
.003
WT-PTL WT-TTL
(MG)
0.0*
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.250
.200
.200
.200
.150
.200
.150
(MG)
*/ 27
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
51.0
46.0
42.0
44.0
40.0
41.0
45.0
.3 ok/
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
54.0
46.0
43.0
44.0
40.0
41.0
42.0
AREA
(FT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
10.0
4.0
6.0
10.0
4.0
10.0
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
908.17
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
360.0
330.0
220.0
170.0
230.0
190.0
310.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02
DRY DRY
1.1 22.3
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.600
CO TUBE
DRY COEF
6.7 .850
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
250.0
220.0
220.0
240.0
250.0
220.0
a/ Not detectable.
b/ x ID"3.
-------
TABLE D-7
BENZ[c]FHENANTHRENE EMISSION DATA
NAME
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD
VW
vwv
PMOS
MO
pco2
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
VS
AS
OS
QA
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRF.S DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL » DRY
PERCENT CO PY VOL* DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOLt DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUflE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE* DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT 1SOKINETIC a/
PARTICULATF WT-PARTIAL"
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-'
PERC IMPINGER CATCH a/
PART. LOAD-PTL«STD CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN",
PART. LOAO-PTL»STK CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN~
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL-7
PARTIC EMIS-TOTA.L-7
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
IN.H20
DEG.F
IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
IN?
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
L8/HR
LB/HR
2
12-03-75
,600
40.0
29.31
.546
15.57
57.6
15.64
109.8
5.20
25.0
.750
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.10
.850
.006
150.0
8
-0.00
29.31
333
29
42
67
93.5
15,40
15,40
0.00
.01516
.01516
.00968
.00968
.00552^.
.00552-'
67
4
12-04-75
.600
40.0
29.31
.606
16.20
67.1
15.9R
134.4
6.37
28.5
.715
15.0
7.3
2.9
74.8
30,69
27.07
.850
.008
155.6
8
-0,00
29,31
346
29
4?
6"
97.1
3.40
23.40
85.47
.0032P
.02255
.00198
.01360
.00117^/
.00807^
4?
6
12-05-75
.600
40.0
29,25
.412
13.89
68.3
13.64
154.8
7.34
35.0
.650
17.2
Q.2
4,1
69.5
31.12
26.53
.850
.006
163.H
8
-0,00
29.25
300
?9
32
60
106.8
11.00
11.00
0.00
.01242
.01242
.00671
.00671
.00345^.7
.003452/
64
a/
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
112
-------
NAME
ON
TT
PR
PM
VM
TM
VMSTO
VW
VWV
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
HWD
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
VS
AS
QS
OA
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
TABLE D-7 (Concluded)
UNITS
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL HiiO VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 RY VOL* DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOLt DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL. DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
MET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOtfRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC /
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL~
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-7
PERC IMPINGER CATCH fl/
LOAD-PTL.STD
LOAD-TTL.STD
LOAD-PTL.STK
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
CNI/
LOAD-TTL.STK CN~
PARTIC F.MIS-PARTI;*'a/
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN.H20
DEG.F
IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
IN2
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/OSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
e
12-06-75
.600
35.0
29.65
.357
10.99
45.3
11.43
96.1
4.56
?8.5
.715
16.1
6.4
1.5
76.0
30.fl3
27.18
.850
.006
155.0
7
-0.00
29.65
286
29
35
57
9S.O
0.00
19.80
100.00
0.00000
.02667
0.00000
.01629
0.00000
,00798k/
39
10
12-07-75
.600
40.0
29.65
.312
11.98
44.3
12.49
160.0
7.96
38.9
.611
18.2
5.1
5.5
71.2
31.12
26.01
.850
.oos
204.4
a
-0.00
29.65
294
29
2a
59
111.8
0.00
10.30
100.00
0.00000
.01270
0.00000
.00613
0.00000
,00309£/
14
12
12-08-75
.600
35.0
29. 3S
.193
7.99
44.2
8.24
83.0
3.93
32.3
.677
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.21
.850
.003
258.6
7
-0.00
29.35
243
29
24
49
100.5
0.00
27.30
100.00
0.00000
.05101
0.00000
.02498
0.00000
.01040k/
-11
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
c/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
113
-------
TABLE D-8
BENZ[_c]PHENANTHRENE EMISSION DATA (METRIC RESULTS)
NAME
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VW
VWM
PMOS
MO
pco2
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
QSM
QAM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF HUN
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL. DRY
PERCENT 02 PY VOL. DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AHEA
STK FLOwRATEt DRY»STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC ,
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL-
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-
PERC IMPINGER CATCH a/
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN-/
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN~,
PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CNf,
PART. LOAD-TTLtSTK CN-
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL-
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-
PEPCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
HF.G.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MR
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
2
12-03-75
.600
A 0.0
29.31
.546
15.57
57.6
.44
109.8
.15
25.0
.750
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.10
.850
.008
65.5
8
-0.00
29.31
101.4
29
1.2
1.9
93.5
15.40
15.40
0.00
34.70
34.70
22.16
22.16
,00250k/
.0025 Ok/
67
4
12-04-75
.600
40.0
29.31
.606
16.20
67.1
.45
134.4
.IB
28.5
.715
15.0
7.3
2.9
74.8
30.69
27.07
.850
.008
68.7
8
-0.00
29.31
105.6
29
1.2
2.0
97.1
3.40
23.40
85.47
7.50
51.60
4.52
31.12
.00053J1/
.00366k'
4?
6
12-05-75
.600
40.0
29.25
.412
13.89
68.3
.39
154.8
.21
35.0
,650
17.2
9.2
4.1
69.5
31.12
26.53
.850
.006
73.2
8
-0.00
29.25
01.5
29
.9
1.7
106.8
11.00
11.00
0.00
28.43
28.43
15.35
15.35
.00157k/
.00157k/
64
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
114
-------
TABLE D-8 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS 8 10 12
12-06-75 12-07-75 12-08-75
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VW
VWM
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
OSM
QAM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H?0 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOLf DRY
PERCENT 0?. BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL. DRY
PERCENT N2 OY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUUE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE* DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKIMETIC ,
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAIF
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-7
PERC IMPINGER CATCH ,
PART. LOAD-PTLfSTD CN-/
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN-/
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTK CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN~
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIALr
PARTIC tMIS-TOTAL^'
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
OEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MTN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
.600
35.0
29.65
.357
10.99
45.3
.32
96.1
.13
28.5
.715
16.1
6.4
1.5
76.0
30.83
27.18
.850
.006
68.3
7
-0.00
29.65
87.1
29
1.0
1.6
95.0
0.00
19.80
100.00
0.00
61.03
0.00
37.27
0.00000
.00362^
39
.600
40.0
29.65
.312
11.98
44.3
.35
168.0
.23
38.9
.611
18.2
5.1
5.5
71.2
31.12
26.01
.850
.005
95.8
8
-0.00
29.65
89.6
29
.8
1.7
111.8
0.00
10.30
100.00
0.00
29.07
0.00
14.03
0.00000
.00140£/
14
.600
35.0
29,35
.193
7.99
44.2
.23
83.0
.11
32.3
.677
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31,61
27.21
.850
.003
125.9
7
-0.00
29.35
74.0
29
.7
1.4
100.5
0.00
27.30
100.00
0.00
116.72
0.00
57.16
0.00000
.00472b_/
-11
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack? to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
c_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
115
-------
TABLE D-9
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (BENZ|V]PHENANTHRENE)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
TS AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
OS STK FLOWRATE* DRY,STD CN
QA ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PART
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PART
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE NT-PARTIAL^/
PART. LOAD-PTL«STD CN2/
PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CN3./
PART 1C UMIS-PARTIAL-
ICULATES -- TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE NT-TOTAL^ /
PART. LOAD-TTLtSTD CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN~
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-'
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
UNITS
DSCF
OEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
GR/DSCF
6R/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GP/ACF
LB/HR
?
12-03-75 1
15.64
25.0
150.0
42
67
93.5
15.40
.01516
.00968
.00552b-/
15.40
.01516
.00968
.00552^/
0.00
15.98
28.5
155.6
42
69
97.1
3.40
.00320
.00198
.00117.?-'
23.40
.02255
.01360
.00807-'
85.47
13.64
35.0
163.8
32
60
106.fl
11.00
.01242
.00671
.00345^
11.00
.01242
.00671
0.00
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
-------
TABLE D-9 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS B 10 12
12-06-75 12-07-75 12-08-75
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STO CONO
PMOS
TS
QS
QA
PERI
PART
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PART
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATEt DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
ICULATES — MARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAU-PTL»STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
ICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-',
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN^/
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN^'
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL2/
PERC IMPINOER CATCH
OSCF
OEG.F
OSCFM
ACFM
MO
GR/OSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
OSCF
OEG.F
OSCFM
ACFM
11.43
?8.5
155.0
35
57
95.0
12.49
38.9
204.4
28
59
111.0
8.24
32.3
258.6
24
49
100.5
MG
GR/OSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
0.00
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
19.80
.02667
.01629
.00798k/
100.00
10.30
.01270
.00613
.00309£/
100.00
a/ x 10-3.
]>/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
cj Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
27.30
.05101
.02498
.01040k/
100.00
-------
TABLE D-10
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS (BENZ[£]PHENANTHRENE)
oo
NAME
VMSTM
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
PARTI
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE, DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT 1SOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
CULATF.S -— PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICIPATE WT-PARTIAL^
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN^/
PART. LOAO-PTL,STK CN^7
PARTIC t MIS-PARTIAL-7
UNITS
NCM
DEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG/NM3
M6/M3
KG/HR
?
12-03-75
.443
25.0
65.5
1.2
1.9
93.5
67
15.40
34.70
22.16
- .00250£7
4
12-04-75
.453
28.5
68,7
1.2
2.0
97.1
4?
3.40
7.50
4.52.
.00053-7
6
12-05-75
«3B6
35.0
73.2
.9
1.7
106.8
64
11.00
28.43
15.35
.00157k/
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-7,
PART. LOAD-TTL«STD CN-7
PART. LOAD-TTLtSTK. CN^7
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-7
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
15.40
34.70
22.16
.002 5 Ok/
0.00
23.40
51.60
31.12
.00366k/
85.47
11.00
28.43
15.35
.00157k/
0.00
al x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
-------
TABLE D-10 (Concluded)
NAME
VMSTM
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
NCM
VOL DRY GAS-STO CONO
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVO STACK TEMPERATURE OEG.C
STK FLOWRATE* ORYtSTD CN NM3/MIN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE M3/MIN
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
MF PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
CANM PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN
CATM PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CN
CAWM PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PARTICULATE WT
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK
PARTIC KMIS-TOTAL2/
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
B
12-06-75
.324
2fl.5
6B.3
1.0
1.6
95.0
39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
19.80
61.03
37.27
.00362V
100.00
10
12-07-75
.354
38.9
95.8
.8
1.7
111.8
14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
10.30
29.07
14.03
.ooi4o£'
100.00
12
12-08-75
.233
32.3
125.9
.7
1.4
100.5
-11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
27.30
116.72
57,16
.00472V
100.00
at/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
-------
TABLE D-ll
BENZ(V]PYRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG
50
.F)
.0
PORT-
PO
1
2
4
3
5
6
7
8
INT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.H6)
29.31
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(OCF) (
854.97
857.01
859.01
860.85
863.15
865.45
867.35
869.71
RUN- 4
H20 PARTIC
COND WT-PTL
(ML)
134.4
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.008
.008
.007
.011
.ail
.006
.011
(M6)
3.40£/
DELTA
H
DATE- 12-04-75
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
-------
TABLE D-12
BENZ[V]PYRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
50.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
2 1
4 1
3 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.25
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
-o.oo
METER
VOL
(DCF) (]
871.25
872.97
874.84
876.42
878.15
879.83
882.05
883,70
RUN- 6 DATE- 1
H?0 PARTIC PARTIC
COND
( Ml )
154.8
DELTA
P
I.H?0)
.004
.006
.006
.004
.006
.006
.010
.006
WT-PTL WT-TTL
(MG)
3.2C
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.300
.350
.450
.300
.400
.400
.700
.400
(MG
'-' ->•
TEMP
IN
(D.F) (
6fl.O
67.0
67.0
69.0
66.0
68.0
70.0
70.0
>
2o£/
TEMP
OUT
D.F)
70.0
67.0
67.0
69.0
67.0
68.0
70.0
70.0
2-05-75
STACK INIT
AREA
(FT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
8.0
10.5
7.0
VOL
(DCF)
869.81
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
155.0
150.0
160.0
160.0
165.0
180*0
185.0
PERC PERC PFRC PITOT
02 C02
DRY DRY
9.2 17.2
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T OIA
(D.F) (IN)
70.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
.600
,600
.600
.600
CO TUHE
DRY COEF
4.1 .850
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
300.0
300.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
400.0
300.0
x 10-3.
-------
Ni
TABLE D-13
BENZ[ji]PYRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
40.0
PORT-
POINT
4 1
3 1
5 1
6 1
7 I
8 1
1 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.65
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
885.07
886.77
888.41
889.80
891.43
89J.04
894.69
RUN- 8
H20 PARTIC
COND
(ML)
96.1
DELTA
P
I.HPO)
.004
.006
.006
.004
.006
.006
.006
WT-PTL
(MO)
0.00£/
HELTA
H
U.H20) (
.250
.400
.400
.250
.400
.400
.400
DATE- 12-06-7b
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL
(
TEMP
IN
D.F
44.
42.
43.
44.
44.
49.
50.
)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MG)
e.eok/
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
46.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
44.0
49.0
50.0
AREA
(FT?)
,?0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.0
5.0
9.0
9.0
INIT
VOL
( DCF )
883.70
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
150.0
140.0
155.0
145.0
160.0
175.0
160.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02
DRY DRY
6.4 16.1
S.GF.L PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
.600
.600
70.0 .600
.600
.600
.600
CO TUBE
DRY COEF
1.5 .850
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
300.0
300.0
P50.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
a/ Not detectable.
b/ x 10-3.
-------
10
CO
TABLE D-14
BENZlVJPYRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.
40,
F)
0
PORT-
POI
1
4
3
5
6
7
8
2
NT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.65
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
896.12
898.14
899.48
901.06
902.40
903.95
905.49
906.78
RUN- 10
H?0 PARTIC
COND
(ML)-
168.0
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.010
.004
.006
.004
.006
.005
.005
WT-PTL
(MG)
o.ooiL/
DELTA
H
(I.H20) (
.250
.650
.250
.300
.250
.300
.300
.200
DATE- 12-07-75
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL
(MG
16. i
TEMP
IN
D.F) (
42.0
41.0
41.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
)
30_/
TEMP
OUT
D.F)
45.0
41.0
41.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
AREA
(FT2)
.20
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG
5.0
11.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
6.0
8.0
VOL
(DCF)
894.80
STACK
TEMP
) (D.F)
180.0
205.0
165.0
175.0
175.0
185.0
215.0
335.0
PERC PERC PERC PI TOT
02
DRY
5.1 1
S.GEL
TEMP
(D.F)
50.0
60.0
70.0
C02
DRY
8.2
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
CO TUBF
DRY COEF
5.5 .850
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
400.0
250.0
300.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
a/ Not detectable.
b/ x 10-3.
-------
to
-p-
TABLE D-15
BENZ[V]PYRENE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
40.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
?. 1
4 1
3 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.35
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
909.38
910.51
911.59
912.73
913.88
915.17
916.16
RUN- 12
H20 PARTIC
COND WT-PTL
(ML>
83.0
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.005
.003
.003
.003
.004
.004
.003
(M6)
o.ool/
DELTA
H
DATE- 12-08-75
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
-------
TABLE D-16
BENZ[a]PYRENE EMISSION DATA
NAME
DN
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD
VH
VWV
PMOS-
MD
PC02
P02 ... -
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS .
TS
NP
PST _ ...
PS
vs
A C
Aw —
OS
QA
PERI- -
MF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CONO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL* DRY
PERCENT 02 OY VOL » DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL » DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DR-Y -STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES- OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
CTAPK ARFA
. o 1 A V-FV-- -Mrvt^M - - - — — •- - - — - - -
STK FLOWRATE, DRY»STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT iSOKlNtTIC -
PARTICULATE WT-PARTI AIJL/
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL^'
PERC IMPINGER CATCH -.
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN^',
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD Cl£'
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTK . CN2/,
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN-7
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAlJ^
PARTIC EM1S-TOTAL-'
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
OEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
IN.H20
DEG.F
IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
TN9
- I PI C
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
4
12-04-75
.600
40.0
29.31
.606
16.20
67.1
15.98
134.4
6.37
28.5
.715
15.0
7.3
2.9
74.8
30.69
27.07
.850
.008
155.6
8
-0.00
29.31
346
PQ
£ *
42
69
97.1
3.40
14.30
76.22
.00328
.01378
.00198
.00831
.00117^
.00493b-/ •
42
6
12-05-75
.600
40.0
29.25
.412
13.89
68.3
13.64
154.8
7.34
35.0
.650
17.2
9.2
4.1
69,5
31.12
26.53
,850
.006
163.8
8
-0.00
29.25
300
PO
c ^
32
60
106.8
3.20
7.20
55.56
.00361
.00813
.00195
.00439
.0010()b>/
.00226-7
64
8
12-06-75
,600
35.0
29.65
.357
10,99
45.3
11.43
96.1
4,56
28.5
.715
16.1
6.4
U5
76.0
.-- 30.83
27.18
.850
.006
155.0
7
-0.00
29.65
286
29
.... f*. r
35
57
95.0
0.00
6.60
100.00
0.00000
.00889
0.00000
.00543
0.00000
.002 6^
39
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
125
-------
NAME
TABLE D-16 (Concluded)
DESCRIPTION UNITS
10
_DN —
TT
PB
.PM .........
VM
TM
VMSTD-
VW
VWV
PMOS ..
MD
PC02
P02. ...
PCO
PN2
_MWD
MM
CP
OPS _
TS
NP
DATE OF RUN
. .PROS£_4LIP—D-I-AME-T-E-8
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
_AVG ORIFICE -P-RES-&ROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
-V-01 DR-Y—GAS^SJ.O - COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
.PERCENT... M.01SIUHE_flY. -VOL —
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
_P£RC£NI...D2_By-_V£lL4--DA.Y
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOLt DRY
12-07-75
12
12-08-75
MIN
IN.HG
DCF
DEG.F
- DSCF-
ML
SCF
PS
vs
-AS
OS
QA
.P£R1_.
MF
MT
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
-^AVG--SJK-J/ELOCIT-Y HEAD WUW20 .
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPM
._S TACK—AREA I-N2-
STK FLOWRATE» DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOXRATE
._£EftCENl_I5 OJU-biEJ. J C a i
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAIT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-
ACFM
MG
MG
40.0
29.65
-,312-
11.98
44.3
-1-2,4-9
168.0
7.96
. 38^9.
.611
18.2
5*1
5.5
71.2
31.12
26.01
.850
.4)05-
204.4
8
.--0...00
29.65
294
29..
28
59
0.00
16.80
35.0
29.35
7.99
44.2
6*2-4
83.0
3.93
-32.. 3.
.677
22.3
-U4-
6.7
69.9
3U6-1-
27.21
.850
..003
258.6
7
29,35
243
----------- 29
24
49
---- 10.0.5-.
0.00
32.20
CAN
CAO
.CAT...... -
CAU
CAW
CAJ< ___
EA
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN~/ GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN£/ GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN£ GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIA^-7 LB/HR
_..PART.IC__£MlSr-j
0.00000
.02072
^0 -.00000
.01000
0.00000
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
14
0.00000
.06016
-0.00000
.02946
0.00000
01227£/
-11
£/ X 10-->.
b_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
126
-------
TABLE D-17
BENZJVJPYRENE EMISSION DATA (METRIC RESULTS)
NAME .. -DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUM
-.-. UNITS — 4- -6 -8
12-04-75 12-05-75 12-06-75
DN
TT
PB.~-
PM
VM
T-M
VMSTM
VW
VWrt..
PMOS
MD
P.C02 —
P02
PCO
PN2
MUD
MW
CP-
DPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
QSM
QAR--
PERI
MF
MX
1C
CANM
CAOM_
CATM
CAUM
CAWM_
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
. BARSMEIRJLC-P-RESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
_A V-G -GAS-METER—T-E-MP-
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
V-QL -H20-.V.APOR«SIO-COND- --
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PER.CFJJJ- C02 -BY-tf-Ol^-DR-Y- -
PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
IN
WIN
I1»UHG
IN.H20
DCF
NCM
ML
NM3
.600
40.0
29,31
.606
16.20
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR rtT-STK GAS
.-PJLTOJ-JUaF CnFFF-J.C.I£AiT- __
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
..NEI-SAMPL ING-.P-OIN-TS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
. .AV-G. -SIACK-6AS VEL OCI-T-Y- -
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATEi DRY,STD CN
--ACT-U AL—SIACK-F-UD WRA T-E—
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE
_ PART4£ULAi£.-W.T--r..n).XAL-/ -—
PERC IMPINGER CATCH /
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN-/
__P-Afi-T-.. -LaAD.-T Ji^-S-IO-CN-/
PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN~
,a/
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
-4H/M-IN -
IN2
NM3/MIN
,
WT-PARTIAL-
MG
._ P-AR TIC.. .EMIS'-P-ARTTA^L-
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-7
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
MG/NM3
_MG/NM3-
M6/M3
MG/M3
tG/HR-
KG/HR
.002242.7
42
4.47
10.05
.00046k/
,00102k/
64
100.00
0.00
-.-20,34-
0.00
12.42
.^4)000-0
.0012!£/
39
a/ x 10-3.
b_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
127
-------
TABLE D-17 (Concluded)
NAME - DESCRIPTION-
DATE OF RUN
UNITS 10
12-07-75 12-08-75
DN
TT
PB .
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VW
VWM
PMOS
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP ...
DPS
TSM
NP ...
PST
PS
VSM
AS
OSM
QAM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP- -
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND -
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT.. C02 8Y- VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT- N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-ORY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
.NET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY-
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL -STACK FLOWRATE.
PERCENT ISOKINETIC /
a /
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL"
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAll-'
PERC IMPINGER CATCH /
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN~/
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN^/
PART. LOAO-TTL»STK CN~
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIALr
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAtr^
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
.600
. 40.0
29.65
.312
11.98
44.3
.35
168.0
.23-
38.9
.611
18.2
5.1
5.5
71.2
31.12
26,01
.850
,005
95.8
8
-0.00
29.65
89.6
29
.8
1.7
111.8
0.00
16.80
100.00
0.00
47.42
0.00
22.89
0.00000
.00228J2/
14
.600
35.0
29.35
.193
7.99
44.?
.23
83.0
.11
32.3
.677
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.21
.850
.003
125.9
7
-0.00
29.35
- 74,0
29
.7
1,4.
100.5
0.00
32.20
100.00
0.00
137.67
0.00
67.4?
0.00000
.005 5 6£/
-11
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack? to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
c/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
128
-------
TABLE D-18
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (BENZIVJPYRENE)
NJ
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
TS AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
OS STK FLOwRATE.-DRYtSTD CN
QA ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
a/
MF PARTICULATE NT-PARTIAL",
CAN PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN-'
CAT PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CN-7
CAW PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL-7
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
MT PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL" a/
CAO PART. LOAD-TTL«STD CN~/
CAU PART. LOAD-TTL.STK7 CN-
CAX PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-
IC PERC IMPINGER CATCH
DSCF
DEO.F
DSCFM
ACFM
MO
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
12-04-75 12-05-75 12-06-75
15.98
28.5
155.6
69
97.1
13.64
35.0
163.8
IP
(J C.
60
106.8
11.43
28.5
155.0
35
- ^j ^f
57
95.0
MO
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
3.40
.00328
.00198
.00117-'
3.20
.00361
.00195
.ooiooH/
0.00
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
14.30
.01378
.00831
.00493^
76.22
7.20
.00813
,00439
. 002 26^
55.56
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
6.60
.00889
.00*43
.00266£/
100.00
-------
TABLE D-18 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS 10 12
12-07-75 12-08-75
VMSTD
PMOS
TS
OS
OA
PERI
PARTI
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE, DRYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
CULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAD-PTL«STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
DSCF
DEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
.. -
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
- a/
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL" a/
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK CN~
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL^7
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
OSCF
OEG.F
DSCFM
ACFM
12.49
38.9
204.4
28
59
111.8
8.24
32.3
258.6
24
49
100.5
0.00
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
16.80
.02072
.01000
.00504k/
100.00
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
0.00
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
32.20
.06016
.02946
.01227£/
100.00
-------
TABLE D-19
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS (BENZ[£]PYRENE)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
PART
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PART
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STO CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE. WT-PARTI AL-/
PART. LOAD-PTLtSTD CN^/
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN-'
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL-
ICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
a/
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL~ a/
PART. LOAO-TTL»STD CN^/
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK. CN~
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-'
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
UNITS
NCM
DEG.C
NM3/M1N
M3/MIN
MO
MO/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MO
MO/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
4
12-04-75
.453
?8.5
68.7
1.2
2.0
97.1
42
3.40
7.50
4,52
.00053^/
14.30
31.53
19.01
.00224k/
76.22
6
12-05-75
,3ft6
35.0
73.2
.9
1.7
106.6
64
3.20
8.27
4.47
.00046k/
7.20
18.61
10.05
.00102k/
55.56
8
12-06-75
.324
28.5
68.3
1.0
1.6
95.0
39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
6.60
20.34
12.42
,00121-/
100.00
a x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
c/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
TABLE D-19 (Concluded)
NAME
VMSTM
PMOS
TSM
QSM
QAM
PERI
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
NCM
10
12
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.C
STK FLOWRATE* DRY.STD CN NM3/MIN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE M3/MIN
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
MF PARTICULAR WT-PARTIAL
CANM PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
CATM PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CN
CAWM PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH
12-07-75 12-08-75
.354
38.9
95.8
.8
1.7
111.0
14
.233
32.3
125.9
.7
1.4
100.5
-11
MG
M6/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
af x 10-3.
jb/ Per stackj to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
c/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL" a/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN^/
PART. LC)AD-TTL,STK, CN~
PARTIC EM1S-TOTAL-
PERC-IMPINGER CATCH
MG
MO/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
16.80
47.42
22.89
.002 2 ak/
100.00
32.20
137.67
67.42
.00556£/
100.00
-------
TABLE D-20
POM-LIKE MATERIAL DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
DATE- 12-03-75
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
40.0
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
STACK H20
VAC COND
(I.H20) (ML)
PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT PERC PERC PERC PITOT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL 02 C02 CO TUBE
(M6) (MO) (DCF) DRY DRY DRY COEF
29.31 0.00 109.8 345.00£/ 376.00£/ .20 837.66 9.2 11.0 1.9 .850
UJ
PORT-
POINT
1
2
4
3
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(OCF) (I
838.98
840.69
842.82-
845.03
847.27
849.49
851.22
853.23
DELTA
P
.H?0)
.005
.006
.009
.009
.011
.011
.004
.008
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.270
.400
.650
.700
.700
.650
.450
.550
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
43.0
49.0
53.0
58.0
62.0
64.0
65.0
65.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
43.0
49.0
53.0
60.0
62.0
64.0
66.0
65.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I. MO)
8.5
5.0
5.0
6.0
9.0
7.0
12.0
12.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
140.0
145.0
130.0
140.0
160.0
155.0
165.0
165.0
TEMP T DIA
-------
TABLE D-21
POM-LIKE MATERIAL DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
DATE- 12-04-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20
TEMP PRES VAC COND
(OG.F) (I.HO) (I.H20-) (ML)
50.0
29.31
0.00 134.4
PORT-
POINT
1
2
4
3
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(M
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
IN)
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
METER DELTA
VOL P
(DCF) (I.H20)
854,
857,
859,
860,
863,
865,
867,
869,
,97
,01
,01-
,85
as
,45
,35
,71
.004
.008
.008
.007
.011
.011
.006
.011
PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MO) (MO) (FT2) (DCF)
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
143. 00£
£/ 213. 00£/ .20 853.51 7.3 15.0 2.9 .850
ELTA
H
H20)
.500
.600
.550
.500
.700
.700
.600
.700
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
64
58
61
64
68
72
73
75
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
(D.F
66.
60.
61.
64.
68.
72.
73.
75.
) (I. HO)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.
7.
5.
5.
12.
9.
5.
13.
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
STACK S.GEL PROBE
TEMP TEMP T DIA
(D.F
150.
145.
160.
160.
165.
150.
160.
155.
) (D.F) (IN)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 600
.600
.600
.600
.600
• 600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
250
350
350
320
400
400
300
400
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
a/
10-3.
-------
TABLE D-22
POM-LIKE MATERIAL DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
OJ
Ul
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
50.0
PORT-
POINT
1 1
2 1
4 1
3 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
ATMOS
PRES
(I.HG)
29.25
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
-0.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
871.25
872.97
874.84
876.42
878.15
879.83
882.05
883.70
RUN- 6
H?0 PARTIC
COND WT-PTL
-------
TABLE D-23
POM-LIKE MATERIAL DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 8
DATE- 12-06-75
ATMOS ATMOS
TEMP PRES
(DG.F) (I.H6)
STACK H20
VAC COMD
(I.H20) (ML)
PART 1C
WT-PTL
(MG)
PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
40.0 29.65 0.00 96.1
0.002/ 191.OQb
STACK INIT PERC PERC PERC PHOT
AREA VOL 02 C02 CO TUBE
(FT2) (DCF) DRY DRY DRY COEF
.20 883.70 6.4 16.1 1.5 .850
PORT-
POINT
4
3
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (1
885.07
886.77
888.41
889.80
891.43
893.04
894.69
DELTA
P
I.H20) (
.004
.006
.006
.004
.006
.006
.006
DELTA
H
I.H20)
.250
.400
.400
.250
.400
.400
.400
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
44.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
44.0
49.0
50.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
(D.F) I
46.0
42.0
43,0
44.0
44.0
49.0
50.0
tl.HG)
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.0
5.0
9.0
9.0
STACK S.GEL
TEMP TEMP
(D.F) (D.F)
150.0
140.0
155.0
145.0 70.0
160.0
175.0
160.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL n
(FPM) g£p!l
250.0 "J
300.0 ^«^
300.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
aj Not detectable.
b/ x 10-3.
-------
TABLE D-24
POM-LIKE MATERIAL DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 10
DATE- 12-07-75
CO
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20 PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT
TEMP PRES VAC CONO WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL
(06, F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML) (MG) (MG) (FT2) (DCF)
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
40.0
29.65 0.00 168.0 160. 002/ 416. 00£/ .20 894.80 5.1 18.? 5.5 .850
PORT-
PO
1
4
3
5
6
7
8
2
INT
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
896.12
898.14
899.48.
901.06
902.40
903.95
905.49
906.78
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.004
.010
.004
.006
.004
.006
.005
.005
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.250
.650
- .250
.300
.250
.300
.300
.200
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
42.0
41.0
41.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
45.0
41.0
41.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
49.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
11.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
180.0
205.0
165.0
175.0
175.0
185.0
215.0
335.0
S.GEL
TEMP
(D.F)
50.0
60.0
- -.
70.0
-
PROBE
T OIA
(IN)
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
250.0
400.0
250.0
300.0
250.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
£' x 10-
-------
TABLE D-25
POM-LIKE MATERIAL DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
12
DATE- 12-08-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20 PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC COND WT-PTL
(DG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML) (MG)
40.0
29.35
0.00
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL AREA
(MG) (FT2)
INIT PERC PERC PERC PJTOT
VOL OH C02 CO TUBE
(DCF) DRY DRY DRY COEF
83.0 448.OQ2/ 795.00£/ .20 908.17 1.1 22.3 6.7 .850
CO
CO
PORT-
POINT
1
2
4
3
5
6
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
909.38
910.51
911.59
912.73
913.88
915.17
916.16
HELTA
P
I.H20)
.005
.003
.003
.003
.004
.004
• 003
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.250
.200
.200
.200
.150
.200
.150
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
51.0
46.0
42.0
44.0
40.0
41.0
45.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
54.0
46.0
43.0
44.0
40.0
41.0
42.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
5.0
10.0
4.0
6.0
10.0
4.0
10.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
360.0
330.0
220.0
170.0
230.0
190.0
310.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(D.F) (IN)
.600
• 600
.600
.600
50.0 .600
.600
.600
VEL
(FPM)
300.0
250.0
220.0
220.0
240.0
250.0
220.0
a/
x
10-3.
-------
TABLE D-26
POM-LIKE MATERIAL EMISSION DATA
NAME
DN
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTD
VW
VWV
PMOS
MD
PC02
..P02....
PCO
PN2
MtalD. .
MW
CP
DP.S- ...
TS
HP
PST...
PS
vs
AS
-p*-«* • — -
QS
QA
-PERI..
MF
MT
..1C— -
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
-CAX--
EA
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
PROBE T-IP--OI-AMETER -
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
-AVG ORIF-ICE -PRE-S -DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
-VOL -DRY .-GAS-STD -COND- —
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VflPQR-STD COND
... PERCENT-. -MD.I ST-URE- BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT COS 8Y VOLt DRY
PERCENT -02- B-Y-VOL^ DRY. _
PERCENT CO BY VOL. DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULA«..-WJ.*Wt.Y-ST«--&AS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
...AVG-STK VELOCITY-HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
. -STAT I C . PR£S-OF~S-TACK- -
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK AkF_A
STK FLOWRATEt DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
-..PERCENT ..JSOKJNEJIC a/
PART1CULATE WT-PARTI.AIT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAl^'
_.PEHC-JMPJN6£.R_CATCH- /
PART. LOAD-PTLiSTD CN-/
PART. LGAD-TTLtSTD CNj/
PART. .LOAD-PTL-*-STK CN-^_.
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN^
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL-7
....PART 1C E-MIS-TCTA4.-7—
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
I-N - -
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20 -
DCF
DEG.F
- DSCF —
ML
SCF
— -
-IN.H20
DEG.F
-IK. KG
IN.HG
FPM
IN? .....
— i 1^ ^
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GPVACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
-4.-B/HR —
2
12-03-75
.600
40.0
29.31
.546
15.57
57.6
- 15.64
109.8
5.20
25.0
.750
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.10
.850
- - .00^
150.0
8
-0.00
29.31
333
29 •-
W 7
42
67
93.5.-
345.00
376.00
---8.24-
.33970
.37022
.21694
.23643
.i^'ee^7
.13477^-
67
4
12-04-75
- .-600-
40.0
29,31
-.606
16.20
67.1
- - 15.-9B -
134.4
6.37
- 2o.5
.715
15.0
7^3-
2.9
74.8
• -- 30.69 -
27.07
.850
- .003
155.6
8
---0.00
29.31
346
. -_?Q
l« J
42
69
97..1
143.00
213.00
- 32. *6
.13781
.20526
,06309
,12377
.04932^
.07347-'-
42
6
12-05-75
.600
40.0
29.25
.4-12
13.89
68.3
1-3.64
154.8
7.34
- -35 . 0
.650
17.2
9.2
4.1
69.5
- 31.12
26.53
.850
.006
163.8
8
-0.00
29.25
300
... _ ?Q
b. f
32
60
106.6
69.00
105.00
34-,-29
.07792
.11858
,04206
.06404
.02164k/
- .03294k/
64
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
139
-------
TABLE D-26 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
10
12
12-06-75 12-07-75 12-08-75
DN
TT
PB
PM . ...
VM
TM
VMSTD-.
VW
VWV
PMQS .-
MD
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
.DPS
TS
NP
PST___
PS
VS
A^
- MO •-•
QS
OA
PERI
MF
MT
J.C
CAM
CAO
CAT _
CAU
CAX._. -
EA
PROBE -TIP-.-O.IAMET-ER •--
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
. AVG-.-ORIF.ICE -PRES .-DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
..VOL -OR*. GAS.-.STO-COND
TOTAL H?0 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT ..MOISTURE. ..BY.. .VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
.._ P£R C£NT -Q2-B Y - V.Q-L-* - -DR Y
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT NE 3Y VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR-WT--DR-Y -STK. -GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
._AV.G -STK. VELOCITY .-HEAD -
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
_STA.TJC-P.RES. .OF. ..STACK
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
CT kCK AWT A
__J l.^4^^»\ — J^fl ^ M
STK FLOWRATEf DRY»STD CN
ACTUAL <;TACK FLOWRATE
... PERCENT- ...1S.QK-LNE.T.IC- — ,-
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL-
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-7
_P£RC— IMP-JJ^GEJ? -CAJCH a/—
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN~/
_ PAR T.. .LO AD.-.P JL-t STK_.CN- / .
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN~
PARTIC EMIS-PARTlAll-7
. P.ARUC. EKLS-TOTAl^'
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
- IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
- OSCF
ML
SCF
— ,. .
.-IN.H20
DEG.F
-. IN.HG
IN.HG
FPM
TM?
1 *VC •
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
.GR/ACF..
GR/ACF
LB/HR
. LB/HR.
,6OO
35.0
29.65
,357
10.99
45.3
11.43 -
96.1
4.56
28,5-
.715
16.1
6,4
1.5
76.0
3#»<33
27.18
.850
. -...006-
155.0
7
. -0.00
29.65
286
50
C f '
35
57
95.0
0.00
' 191,00
~- 100.00-
0.00000
.25726
- 0.00000 .
.15711
0.00000
.07695^'...
39
•••600-
40.0
29.65
-.312
11.98
44.3
-12,49—
168.0
7.96
-38.9
.611
18.2
.__. S, 1 -—
5.5
71.2
. 31,12
26.01
.850
.005 -
204.4
6
.-0,00 •--.
29.65
294
po
2G
59
111.8 -
160.00
416.00
- ...61,54—-
.19734
.51308
.,0952-5 -
.24766
.04797£/
• .12472S/-
14
.6-00
35.0
29.35
.193
7.99
44.2
8. -24
83.0
3.93
32.3
.677
22.3
.. . . 1...1 .
6.7
69.9
31,61
27.21
.850
,.0-03-
258. 6
7
... -o.oo
29.35
243
24
49
- • 100,5
448.00
795.00
43,65
.83702
1.48533
-.,40994
.72746
.17067k/
- -,30286k/
-11
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
140
-------
'NAME
ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VMSTM
VW
VWM
PMOS
MO
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
MWD
MW
CP
OPS
TSM
NP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
QSM
0AM
PERI
MF
MT
1C
CANM
CAOM
CATM
CAUM
CAWM
CAXM
EA
TABLE D-27
POM-LIKE MATERIAL EMISSION DATA (METRIC RESULTS)
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF HUN
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
NET TIMt OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 RY VOL» DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
P1TOT TURE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING- POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK- GAS VELOCITY
STACK AREA
STK FLOWRATEt DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
a/
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAlr
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAll-'
PERC IMPINGER CATCH a/
LOAO-PTL»STD CN~/
LOAD-TTL»STD CN~/
LOAD-PTL»STK
LOAO-TTL»STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAll/
PAPTIC tMlS-TOTAll-7
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MG/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HP.
?
12-03-75
.600
40.0
29.31
.546
15.57
57.6
.44
109.8
.15
25.0
.750
11.0
9.2
1.9
77.9
30.13
27.10
.850
.008
65.5
8
-0.00
29.31
101.4
29
1.2
1.9
93.5
345.00
376.00
8.24
777.34
847.19
496.43
541.04
.05609k/
.06113k/
67
4
12-04-75
.600
40.0
29.31
.606
16.20
67.1
.45
134.4
.18
28.5
.715
15.0
7.3
2.9
74.8
30.69
27.07
.850
.008
68.7
8
-0.00
29.31
105.6
29
1.2
2.0
97.1
143.00
213.00
32.86
315.34
469.71
190.15
283.23
.03332-/
4?
6
12-05-75
.600
40.0
29.25
.412
13.89
68.3
.39
154.8
.21
35.0
.650
17,2
9.2
4.1
69.5
31.12
26.53
.850
.006
73.2
8
-0.00
29.25
91.5
29
.9
1.7
106.8
69.00
105.00
34.29
178.32
271.35
96.30
146.55
.00982k/
.01494k/
64
al x 10-3.
b_/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
141
-------
TABLE D-27 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF HUN
DN PROBE TIP DIAMETER
TT NET TIME OF RUN
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PM AVG ORIFICE PRE5 DROP
VM VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
TM AVG GAS METER TEMP
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VWM VOL H20 VAPOR-5TD COND
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL« DRY
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL« DRY
PN2 PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MWD MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
CP PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
DPS AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
TSM AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NP NET SAMPLING POINTS
PST STATIC PRES OF STACK
PS STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
VSM AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
AS STACK AHEA
QSM STK FLOWRATE* DRY,STD CN
QAM ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERI PERCENT 1SOKINETIC ,
MF PARTICULAR WT-PARTIAL-
MT PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL-
IC PERC IMPINGER CATCH /
CANM PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN-/
CAOM PART. LOAO-TTL.STD CN~/
CATM PART. LOAD-PTL*STK CN^/
CAUM PART. LOAO-TTL.STK CN""
CAWM PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAll-7
CAXM PARTIC EMIS-TOTAll-'
EA PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
NCM
ML
NM3
IN.H20
DEG.C
IN.HG
IN.HG
M/MIN
IN2
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG
MR/NM3
MG/NM3
MG/M3
MG/M3
KG/HR
KG/HR
12-06-75
.600
35.0
29.65
.357
10.99
45.3
.3?
96.1
.13
28.5
,715
16.1
6.4
1.5
76.0
30.H3
27.18
.850
.006
68.3
7
-0.00
29.65
87.1
29
1.0
1.6
95,0
0.00
191.00
100.00
0.00
588.70
0.00
359.52
0.00000.
39
10
12-07-75
.600
40.0
29.65
.312
11.98
44,3
.35
168.0
.23
38.9
.611
18.2
5.1
5.5
71.2
31.12
26.01
.850
.005
95.8
8
-0,00
29.65
89.6
29
.8
1.7
111.8
160.00
416.00
61.54
451.57
1174.09
217.97
566.73
.02176S/
.05657£/
14
12
12-03-75
.600
35.0
29.35
,193
7.99
44.2
.23
83.0
.11
32.3
.677
22.3
1.1
6.7
69.9
31.61
27.21
.850
.003
125.9
7
-0.00
29.35
74.0
29
.7
1.4
100.5
448.00
795.00
43.65
1915.38
3398.95
938,08
1664.67
.07741-7'
.13738b-/
-11
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
142
-------
TABLE D-28
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (POM-LIKE^ MATERIAL )
CO
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS 346
13-03-75 12-04-75 12-05-75
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD CONO DSCF
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
TS AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEO.F
OS STK FLOwRATE. DRYtSTD CN DSCFM
OA ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERI
PART
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PART
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
ICULATE
PART
PART
PART
PART
S
I
•
•
I
ICULATES
PART
PART
PART
PART
PERC
I
•
•
I
— PARTIAL CATCH
CULATE NT-PARTIAIr/
LOAD-PTL.STD CN-}
LOAO-PTL»STK CN-7
C FMIS-PARTIAt^'
— TOTAL CATCH
CULATE WT-TOTAlr^/.
LOAD-TTL»STD CN~/
LOAO-TTL,STK CN~
C F.MIS-TOTAL-
IMPINGER CATCH
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
DSCF
OEO.F
DSCFM
ACFM
15.64
25.0
150.0
42
67
93.5
15.98
28.5
155.6
42
69
97.1
13.64
35.0
163.8
32
60
106. B
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
345.00
.33970
.21694
.12366k/
143.00
.13781
.08309
.04932k/
69.00
.07792
.04208
.02164k/
376.00
.37022
.23643
.13477k/
8.24
213.00
.20526
•12377
.073472/
32.86
a/ x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
105.00
.11858
.06404
,03294k/
34.29
-------
TABLE D-28 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
12
UNITS fl 10
12-06-75 12-07-75 12-08-75
VMSTD
PMOS
TS
QS
QA
PERI
PARTI
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PARTI
MT
CAO
CAU
CAX
1C
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATF. » DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
CULATES — MARTIAL CATCH
a/
PARTICULATE NT-PARTIAL",
a /
PART. LOAO-PTL.STD CN|/
PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CN-
PARTIC E.MIS-PARTIAL-
CULATES — TOTAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL^ /
PART. LOAD-TTL»STD CN-/
PART. LOAU-TTL.STK CN~
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-'
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
DSCF
DEG.F
OSCFM
ACFM
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
Lfl/HR
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
DSCF
DEG.F
OSCFM
ACFM
11.43
Z8.5
155.0
35
57
95.0
12.49
38.9
204.4
28
59
111.8
8.24
3?. 3
258.6
24
49
100.5
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
Lfl/HR
0.00
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
160.00
.19734
.09525
.04797k/
448.00
.83702
.40994
.17067£/
191.00
.25726
.15711
.07695£/
100.00
416.00
.51308
.24766
.12472k/
61.54
a/ x 10-TT
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
795.00
1.48533
.72746
.30286£/
43.65
-------
TABLE D-29
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS (POM-LIKE MATERIAL)
-p-
Ul
NAME DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
PMOS
TSM
QSM
0AM
PERI
EA
PART
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PART
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOWRATE, ORYtSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
a/
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL-;
o /
PART. LOAD-PTL»STD CN-,
PART. LOAD-PTL«STK CN-
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL-
ICULATE.S — TUTAL CATCH
PARTICULATF WT-TOTA^ /
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN~/
PART. LOAO-TTLtSTK, CN~
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL-
PERC IMPINRER CATCH
NCM
DEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
'MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
2
12-03-75
.443
25.0
65.5
1.2
1.9
93.5
67
345.00
777.34
496.43
.05 609^'
376.00
847.19
541.04
C\£L 1 1 *3 D /
• wO 1. J. J j
8.24
4
12-04-75
.453
28.5
68.7
1.2
2.0
97.1
A2
143.00
315.34
190.15
.02237-
213.00
469.71
283.23
.03332k/
32.86
6
12-05-75
,3«6
35.0
73.2
.9
1.7
106.8
64
69.00
17R.32
96.30
,00982^/
105.00
271.35
146.55
.01494^L/
34.29
aj x 10-3.
b/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
-------
TABLE D-29 (Concluded)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
DATE OF
VMSTM
PMOS
TSM
QSM
0AM
PERI
EA
PARTI
MF
CANM
CATM
CAWM
PARTI
MT
CAOM
CAUM
CAXM
1C
VOL DHY OAS-STO COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOrtRATE, DRYtSTO CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
CULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
a/
PARTICULAR WT-PARTIAlr,
a /
PART. LOAD-PTL»STO CNF7,
PART. LOAO-PTLtSTK CN-
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL-
CULATES — TOTAL CATCH
a/
PARTICULATE WT-T()TAL~ a/
PART. LOAO-TTL»STD CN~/
PART. LOAD-TTL»STK, CN~
PART1C EMIS-TOTAL-'
PERC IHPIN6ER CATCH
MCM
OEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
MG
MG/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
MG
MR/NM3
MG/M3
KG/HR
0
12-06-75
.324
28.5
68.3
1.0
1.6
95.0
39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
191.00
588.70
.0349l£/
100.00
10
12-07-75
.354
38.9
95.8
.8
1.7
111.8
14
160.00
451.57
217.97
416.00
1174.09
566.73
.05657^
61.54
12
12-08-75
.233
3?. 3
125.9
.7
1.4
100.5
-11
440.00
1915.38
938.08
.0774l£/
795.00
3398.95
1664.67
.13738£/
43.65
bf Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 8.
£/ Per stack; to obtain total for kiln, multiply by 7.
-------
APPENDIX E
FLUE GAS COMBUSTION COMPUTATIONS
147
-------
The computations that follow are based on data found in the
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 23rd Edition— and Lange's Handbook
of Chemistry" and assumptions made as noted.
A long chain aliphatic hydrocarbon, Bryonane (C-nH, , mol wt
282), has been taken to represent the tar and oil fraction of the flue
gas stream. A mole of any referenced gas is assumed to occupy 0.79 cu
ft. A theoretical flame temperature of 3790°F (2090°C) based on several
natural gas streams— was used for combustion of the flue gas stream.
This natural gas then requires 16 cu ft air per cubic foot natural gas-
in addition to that required for combustion of the flue gas stream, and
will produce 24,500 cal/cu ft natural gas.
Heats of vaporization of water are as follows:—4—
Temperature (°C) Heat of vaporization (cal/g)
60 563.2
70 557.5
95 542.7
145 507.3
Specific heats of the various compounds are as follows:—
Compound Specific heat (cal/g/°C)
Air 0.24
Carbon dioxide 0.20
Carbon monoxide 0.25
Nitrogen 0.25
Oxygen 0.22
Water 0.48
148
-------
Computations to determine the net heat available from the flue
gas stream are based on the heats of combustion of the water and tar and
oil fractions less the heat of vaporization of the water.
Computations to determine the air fuel ratio (amount of air to
be added per amount of flue gas to allow combustion) are based on stoi-
chiometric combustion of the given amount of C nH, available in each
s'ample.
Calculations to determine the amount of natural gas needed for
combustion of the flue gas are based on raising the gas stream and addi-
tional air from the stack temperature to the flame temperature. For the
water fraction this includes the heat of vaporization.
These values must be taken as approximate or "ball-park" esti-
mates. The positive heat of combustion for the water fraction indicates
the presence of entrained volatile organics. The tar and oil fraction is
composed of many constituents which may not be accurately represented by
C H • Some constituents may have passed through the sampling train with-
out entrapment or have been lost during sample recovery. Any or all of
these factors may contribute to errors in the calculations.
December 4
Net heat available from flue gas stream:
Water fraction: (296 cal/g) (8.4 g) = 2,486.4 cal
(-557.5 cal/g) (8.4 g) = -4,683.0 cal
149
-------
Tar and oil fraction: (1,185 cal/g) (0.6 g) = 711.0 cal
Net 2,486.4 cal
+ 711.0 cal
3,197.4 cal
-4,683.0 cal
-1,485.6 cal
Air/fuel ratio:
0.6 g C QH (mol wt 282) = 0.002 mole
H20
C02
02
CO
No
% by Volume
30.5
15
(of 69.5)
7.3
2.9
74.8
Volume (cu ft)
0.2562
0.08757
0.0426174
0.0169302
0.4366824
Moles
0.47
0.11
0.05
0.02
0.55
0.84
0.002
0.061
0.04 CO + 0.042 HO
0.061 mole 0 required
0.05 mole 0 available in flue gas
0.011 mole 0« additional required
0.011 mole 0,
0.002 mole fuel
= 5.5
mole air _ volume air
mole fuel volume fuel
= air/fuel ratio = (5.5)1
.1 J
0.21;
Requires 26.2 cu ft air to combust 1 cu ft flue gas
Flue gas combustion:
= 26.2
Stack temperature = 70 C
AT = 2090°C - 70°C = 2020°C
150
-------
Constituent
Moles
Specific heat
(cal/g/°C)
Heat required
per volume
stack gas
sampled (cal)
Heat required
per cu ft
stack gas
(cal)
C02
02
CO
N2
H20
Combustion
0.11
0.05
0.02
0.55
0.47
(100°C to
0.05
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.25
0.48
2090°C = AT = 1990°C)
0.24
1,955
711
283
7,777
8,801
698
2,328
846
337
9,258
9.620
22,389
831
air
Heat of
vaporization
4,683
Heat required
Water fraction 2,486
Tar and oil fraction 711
Net heat available
Net heat required
5,575
28,795
2,690
846
3,806
24,989
Thus, 1.02 cu ft natural gas required per cubic foot flue
gas and approximately 42 cu ft air total
December 6
Net heat available:
Water fraction: (227 cal/g) (4.6 g) = 1,044.2 cal
(-557.5 cal/g) (4.6 g) = 2,564.5 cal
Tar and oil fraction: (7,256 cal/g) (0.6 g) = 4,353.6 cal
Net: +2,833.3 cal
Air/fuel ratio:
0.002 mole
0.05 mole 02
151
-------
0.002 CnftH, + 0.061 On > 0.04 CO., + 0.042 H.O
20 42 2 2 2.
0.011 mole 0 required
0.011 mole 0,
0.002 mole fuel
Air/fuel ratio = -r~— = 26.2
u »i i
Flue gas combustion:
Constituent
Moles
ization
Specific heat
(cal/g/°C)
Heat required
Heat required
per cu ft
stack gas
(cal)
C02
02
CO
N2
H20
Combustion air
Heat of vapor-
0.13
0.05
0.01
0.63
0.26
0.05
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.25
0.48
0.24
2,458
756
150
9,477
4.756
17,597
743
2,728
21,068
Water fraction
Tar and oil fraction
1,111
4,631
Net heat available 5,742
Net heat required 15,326
Requires 0.63 cu ft natural gas per cubic foot flue gas and
approximately 36 cu ft air total
December 7
Net heat available:
Water fraction: (153 cal/g) (16.3 g) = 2,493.9 cal
(-542.7 cal/g) (16.3 g) = -8,846.01 cal
152
-------
Tar and oil fraction: (7,097 cal/g) (1.2 g) = 8,516.4 cal
Net: +2,164.3 cal
Air/fuel ratio:
0.004 mole G H
0.08 mole 0
0.004
0.122
0.08 CO + 0.084 HO
0.042 mole 0 required
0.042 mole 0,
0.004 mole fuel
= 10.5
Air/fuel ratio = 50
Flue gas combustion:
Constituent
Moles
Specific heat
(cal/g/°C)
ization
Heat required
Water fraction
Tar and oil fraction
Heat required
per cu ft
stack gas
(cal)
C02
02
CO
N2
H20
Combustion air
Heat of vapor-
0.30
.0.08
0.09
1.16
0.91
0.20
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.25
0.48
0.24
2,801
598
669
8,617
8,322
21,007
1,467
4.705
27,179
1,326
4,530
Net heat available 5,856
Net heat required 21,323
153
-------
Requires 0.87 cu ft natural gas per cubic foot flue gas and
approximately 64 cu ft air total
December 8 - First Run
Net heat available:
Water fraction: (173 cal/g) (11.0 g) = 1,903 cal
(-507.3 cal/g) (11.0 g) = -5,580.3 cal
Tar and oil fraction: (8,877 cal/g) (0.6 g) = 5,326.2 cal
Net: +1,648.9 cal
Air/fuel ratio:
0.002 mole C QH
0.02 mole Q
0.002 G H + 0.061 0 > 0.04 CO + 0.042 H20
0.041 mole 0 required
0.041 mole 0,
0.002 mole fuel
= 20.5
Air/fuel ratio = 97.6
154
-------
Flue gas combustion:
Constituent
Moles
Specific heat
(cal/8/°C)
Heat required
per cu ft
stack gas
(cal)
C02
02
CO
N2
H20
Combustion air
Heat of vapor-
0.48
0.02
0.15
1.52
0.61
0.20
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.25
0.48
0.24
3,197
107
795
8,052
4,801
16,232
1,046
2,171
ization
Heat required 19,449
Water fraction 740
Tar and oil fraction 2,072
Net heat available 2,812
Net heat required 16,637
Requires 0.68 cu ft natural gas per cubic foot flue gas and
approximately 109 cu ft air total
/
December 8 - Second Test
Net heat available:
Water fraction: (855 cal/g) (11.8 g) = 10,089 cal
(-507.3 cal/g) (11.8 g) = -5,986.14 cal
Tar and oil fraction: (4,715 cal/g) (0.6 g) = 2,829 cal
Net: +6,931.9 cal
Air/fuel ratio:
0.002 mole C 0H,
0.02 mole 0
155
-------
0.002 C H + 0.061 0
0.04 CO + 0.042 HO
0.041 mole 0 required
0.041 mole 0,
0.002 mole fuel
= 20.5
Air/fuel ratio = 97.6
Flue gas combustion:
Constituent
Moles
ization
Specific heat
(cal/g/°C)
Heat required
Heat required
per cu ft
stack gas
(cal)
C02
02
CO
N2
H20
Combustion air
Heat of vapor-
0.48
0.02
0.14
1.49
0.66
0.20
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.25
0.48
0.24
3,260
109
756
8,050
4,503
16,678
2,134
2,375
21,187
Water fraction
Tar and oil fraction
4,004
1,123
Net heat available 5,127
Net heat required 16,060
Requires 0.66 cu ft natural gas per cubic foot flue gas and
approximately 108 cu ft air total
156
-------
APPENDIX F
COMPUTATION OF KILN VOLUME
157
-------
All units in inches
unless otherwise
noted
Area A:
a = 84
b=60
c = 60
Area A = 233.576 sq in.
= 1.622 sq ft
=/(a)2 + (b + c)2 = N/(84)2 + (120)2
= 146.4786674
a + f = 126
f = 126 - 84 = 42
R2 = /(a + f)2 + (c)2 =/(126)2 + (60)2
= 139.5564402
Ri 4. Ro
_ L -r = 143.0175538
/2 2 / 2 2
(b) + (f) =V(60)^ + («r
= 73.23933369
= 1/2
- (d) = 1/2
(143)2 - (73)2 = 138.2498488
9=2 arc sin
(2)
= 2 arc sin •
73 1
(2) (143)J
9 = 0.5178678409 radians
si = (Ri
1 1-^ i
= 74.0641918
Area A = 1/2
= 1/2 [(143) (74)
= 233.5763633
(0'518) =
(e)]
- (73) (138)]
158
-------
R
Area B:
S2
a4f = 126
c = 60
R3 = 138
R2 = 139.5564402
Area B = 139.622 sq in,
= 0.970 sq ft
2-3
= 138'7782201
g = R3 - (a + f) = 138 - (126) = 12
h = Vg2 + c2 =/12)2 + (60)2
= 61.18823416
i = 1/2 \/4(R2_3)2 - (h)2
) (139) - (61)
= 135.3639331
2
9=2 arc sin
(2)
= 2 arc sin
(2) (139)
9 = 0.4445583706 radians
S2 = (R2_3) (62) = (139) (0.445)
= 61.69501066
Area B = 1/2 [(R2_3> (S^ - (h) (i)]
= 1/2 [(139) (62) - (61) (135)]
= 139.6218666
Area C:
Area G = 1/2 (b) (f) = 1/2 (60) (42)
= 1,260
Area C = 1,260 sq in.
= 8.75 sq ft
b = 60
f =42
159
-------
Area D:
c = 60
f = 42
= 54
f+g
Area D = 1/2 [(f) + (f + g)] c
= 1/2 [42 + 54] 60
= 2,880
Area D = 2,880 sq in.
= 20 sq ft
Area E and F:
Area E and F =
a = 84
b = 60
c = 60
Area of Kiln End:
(a) (b + c) = (84) (120)
= 10,080
Area E and F = 10,080 sq in,
= 70 sq ft
Total Area =(A
F)x2
= 233.576 + 139.622 + 1,260
+ 2,280 + 10,080
= 14,693.198 sq in.
= (101.342 sq ft) x 2
= 202.683 sq ft
160
-------
Volume of kiln: Volume = (area) x (length)
= (202.683) (32)
= 6,485.866 cu ft (183.659 cu m)
As one cord of wood is 4 ft x 4 ft x 8 ft, the volume of one
cord of wood is 128 cu ft (3.625 cu m). Thus, the volume of the kiln is
approximately 50.67 cords.
Allowing for air space left along the walls and roof and pro-
vided along the floor, the total amount of wood in the kiln would be
approximately 45 cords.
161
-------
APPENDIX G
PRELIMINARY RUNS - FIELD DATA
162
-------
TABLE G-l
PRELIMINARY DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 1-P DATE- 09-29-75
OJ
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20
TEMP PRES VAC COND
(DG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML)
70.0 29.15
0.00
42.9
PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT PERC PERC PERC PITOT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL 02 C02 CO TUBE
(MG) (MO) (FT2) (OCF) DRY DRY DRY COEF
0.00 0.00 .20 548.70 3.0 13.0 3.5 .B50
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
549.86
551.02
552.17
553.34
554.60
556,56
DELTA DELTA TEMP TEMP TRAIN STACK S.GEL PROBE
P H IN OUT VAC TEMP TEMP T DIA VEL
(DCF) (I.H20) (I.H20) (D.F) (D.F) (I.HG) (D.F) (D.F) (IN) (FPM)
.004
.004
.004
.004
.004
.004
135
135
135
135
135
200
69.0
70.0
75.0
79.0
81.0
83.0
7040
70.0
70.0
72.0
74.0
75.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2*0
2.5
190.0
190.0
240.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
60.0
.597 250.0
.597 250.0
.597 250.0
.597 250.0
.597 250.0
.597 250.0
-------
TABLE G-2
PRELIMINARY DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
2-p
DATE- 09-29-76
ATMOS ATMOS STACK HHO PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC COND WT-PTL
(DG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML) (MG)
70.0 29.12 0.00 35.0 0.00
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) (FT?) (DCF)
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
0.00
.20 556.56 3.0 13,0 3.5 .850
PORT- SAMP
POINT TIME
(MIN)
METER DELTA DELTA TEMP TEMP TRAIN STACK S.GEL PROBE
VQl P H IN OUT VAC TEMP TEMP T DIA VEL
(DCF) (I.H20) (I.H20) (D.F) (D.F) (I.HG) (D.F) (D.F) (IN) (FPM)
.594 250.0
.594 250.0
.594 250.0
75.0 ,594 250.0
,594 250.0
,594 250.0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
557.24
558,61
560.03
561.40
562.70
563.95
.004
.004
.004
.004
.004
.004
.170
.210
.210
.200
.170
.170
75.0
78.0
84.0
87.0
89.0
90.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
80.0
81.0
82.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
230.0
230.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
290,0
-------
TABLE G-3
PRELIMINARY DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 3-P
DATE- 11-04-75
01
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20
TEMP PRES VAC COND
(DG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML)
65.0 29.38
0.00
47.0
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG)
0.00
PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
0.00
STACK
AREA
(FT2)
.20
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
232.3
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
.5 20.0 4.7 .850
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5,00
5.00
5.00
5,00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
233.70
234.59
235.12
236.27
237.36
230.26
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.170
.170
.170
.170
.170
.170
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
68.0
71.0
73.0
75.0-
78.0
80.0
TEMP
OUT
-------
TABLE G-4
PRELIMINARY DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
4-P
DATE- 11-04-75
CTi
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20
TEMP PRES VAC COND
(06.F) (I.HG) (I.H20)
75.0 29.34
0.00
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG)
-PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
STACK
AREA
(FT?)
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
46.5
0.00
0.00
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
0? C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
.20 238.26 .5 20.0 4.7 .850
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
239.33
240.28
241.03
241.63
242.30
243.20
DELTA
P
I.H20)
• 003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
TEMP
IN
-------
TABLE G-5
PRELIMINARY DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 5-P
DATE- 11-04-75
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20 PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC COND WT-PTL
(DG.F) (I.HG) (1.H20) (ML) (MG)
75.0 29.34 0.00 86.5 0.00
PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) " (FT2) (DCF)
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
OH C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
0.00
.20 243.20 .5 20,0 4.7
,850
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
244.31
245.36
246.33
247.40
248.49
249.55
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.002
.002
.002
.002
.002
.002
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.130
.120
.120
.120
.170
.150
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
82.0
82.0
82.0
84.0
84.0
84.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
81.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.MG)
2.0
2.5
3.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
245.0
270.0
270.0
270.0
270.0
270.0
S.GEL PROBE
TEMP T DIA
(O.F) (IN)
.613
.613
.613
65.0 .613
.613
.613
VEL
(FPM)
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
-------
TABLE G-6
PRELIMINARY DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
6-P
DATE- 11-04-75
Ov
oo
ATMOS ATMOS STACK HHO PARTIC PARTIC
TEMP PRES VAC CONO WT-PTL WT-TTL
(06.F) (I.H6) (I.H20) (ML) (M6) (MG)
75.0 29.35 0.00 64.0 0.00 0.00
STACK INIT PERC PERC PERC PITOT
AREA VOL 02 C02 CO TUBE
(FTH) (DCF) DRY DRY DRY COEF
.20 249.55 .5 20.0 4.7 .850
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
METER
VOL
(DCF) (
250.50
251.35
252.50
253.70
254.74
255.75
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.002
.002
.002
.002
.002
.002
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.130
• 130
.150
.170
.150
.150
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
78.0
78.0
78.0
80.0
83.0
86.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
78.0
78.0
79.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
7.5
8.0
7.5
. 6.0
6.5
6.5
STACK S.GEL
TEMP TEMP
(D.F) (D.F)
270.0
280.0
280.0
280.0
280.0
280.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.613
• 613
.613
.613
.613
.613
VEL
(FPM)
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
-------
TABLE G-7
PRELIMINARY EMISSION DATA
cr>
NAME DESCRIPTION UNITS 1-P
DATE OF RUN 09-39-75
DN PROBE TIP DIAMETER IN .597
TT NET TIME OF RUN MIN 30.0
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG 29.15
PM AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20 .146
VM VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF 7.86
TM AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F 74*0
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF 7.60
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML 43,9
VWV VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF 2.03
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL 21.1
MD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS .789
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY 13,0
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY 3.0
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY 3.5
PN2 PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY 80.5
MWD MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS 30.20
MW MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS 27.63
CP PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT .850
DPS AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD- IN.H20 .004
TS AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F 203.3
NP NET SAMPLING POINTS 6
PST STATIC PRES OF STACK IN.HG -0,00
PS STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG 29.15
VS AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPM 250
AS STACK AREA IN2 29
OS STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM 31
QA ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM 50
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC 84.6
EA PERCENT EXCESS AIR 6
2-P
09-29-76
.594
30.0
29.12
.188
7.39
61.4
7.04
35,0
1.66
19.1
.809
13.0
3.0
3.5
80,5
30.20
27.87
.850
.004
225.0
6
-0.00
29.12
250
29
30
50
79.8
6
3-P
11-04-75
.592
30.0
29,38
.170
5.87
71,8
5.75
47.0
2.23
27.9
.721
20.0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
27.53
.850
.003
203.3
6
-0.00
29.38
222
29
25
44
79.7
-9
-------
TABLE G-7 (Concluded)
NAME DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
DN PROBE TIP DIAMETER IN
TT NET TIME OF RUN MIN
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
PM AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VM VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
TM AVG GAS METER TEMP DEO.F
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
VW TOTAL H?0 COLLECTED ML
VWV VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PN2 PERCENT N2 BY VOLi DRY
MWD MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
CP PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
DPS AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD IN.H20
TS AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NP NET SAMPLING POINTS
PST STATIC PRES OF STACK IN.HG
PS STACK PRESSUREt ABSOLUTE IN.HG
VS AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPM
AS STACK AREA IM2
OS STK FLOWRATEt DRYtSTD CN DSCFM
OA ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC
EA PERCENT EXCESS AIR
4-P
11-04-75
.613
30.0
29.34
.050
4.94
78.7
4.77
46.5
2.20
31.6
.684
20*0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
27.04
.850
.003
245.8
6
-0.00
29.34
220
29
22
44
69.8
-9
5-P
11-04-75
.613
30.0
29.34
.135
6.35
82,4
6.09
86.5
4.10
40.3
.597
20.0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
25.90
.850
.002
265.8
6
-0.00
29.34
200
29
17
40
115.3
-9
6-P
11-04-75
.613
30.0
29.35
.147
6.20
79.8
5.97
64.0
3.03
33.7
.663
20.0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
26.77
.850
.002
278.3
6
-0.00
29.35
200
29
19
40
103.7
-9
-------
TABLE G-8
PRELIMINARY EMISSION DATA (METRIC RESULTS)
NAME DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
ON PROBE TIP DIAMETER IN
TT NET TIME OF RUN MIN
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HQ
PM AV6 ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VM VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
TM AV6 GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD CONO NCM
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VMM VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND NM3
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL* DRY
PN2 PERCENT N2 BY VOL• DRY
MWD MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
CP PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
DPS AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD IN.H20
TSM AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.C
NP NET SAMPLING POINTS
PST STATIC PRES OF STACK IN.HG
PS STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HO
VSM AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY M/MIN
AS STACK AREA IN2
QSM STK FLOWRATEt DRYtSTD CN NM3/MIN
QAM ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE M3/MIN
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC
EA PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1-p
09-29-75
.597
30.0
29.15
.146
7.86
74.0
.22
4?. 9
.06
21.1
.789
13.0
3.0
3.5
80.5
30.20
27.63
.850
.004
95.2
6
-0.00
29.15
76.2
29
.9
1.4
84.6
6
2-P
09-29-76
.594
30,0
29.12
.188
7.39
81.4
.20
35.0
.05
19.1
.809
13.0
3.0
3.5
80.5
30.20
27.87
.850
.004
107.2
6
-0.00
29.12
76.2
29
.9
1.4
79.8
6
3-P
11-04-75
.592
30.0
29.38
.170
5.87
71.8
.16
47.0
.06
27.9
,721
20.0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
27.53
.850
.003
95.2
6
-0.00
29.38
67.6
29
.7
1.3
79.7
-9
-------
TABLE G-8 (Concluded)
NJ
NAME DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
DN PROBE TIP DIAMETER IN
TT NET TIME OF RUN MIN
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HO
PM AV6 ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VM VOL DRY GAS-METER CQND DCF
TM AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VMSTM VOL DRY GAS-STD COND NCM
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VMM VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND NM3
PMOS PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOLt DRY
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL. DRY
PN2 PERCENT N2 BY VOLt DRY
MWO MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
CP PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
DPS AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD IN.H20
TSM AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.C
NP NET SAMPLING POINTS
PST STATIC PRES OF STACK IN.H6
PS STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
VSM AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY M/MIN
AS STACK AREA IN2
QSM STK FLOWRATE. DRYtSTD CN NM3/MIN
QAM ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE M3/MIN
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC
EA PERCENT EXCESS AIR
4-P»
11-04-75
.613
30.0
29.34
.050
4.94
78.7
.13
46.5
.06
31*6
.684
20.0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
27.04
,850
.003
118.8
6
-0.00
29.34
67.1
29
.6
1*2
69.8
-9
5-P
11-04-75
.613
30.0
29.34
.135
6.35
82.4
.17
86.5
.12
40.3
.597
20.0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
25.90
.850
.002
129.9
6
-0.00
29.34
61.0
29
.5
1*1
115.3
-9
6-P
11-04-75
.613
30.0
29.35
.147
6.20
79.8
.17
64.0
.09
33.7
.663
20.0
.5
4.7
74.8
31.22
26.77
.850
.002
136.8
6
-0.00
29.35
61.0
29
.5
1.1
103.7
-9
-------
APPENDIX H
COMPUTATION FOR ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
173
-------
a/
(1.032) (TS + 460) (VMSTD) -
(VS) (TT) (PS) (MD) (DN)2
PM ,
„.,-- (17.71) (VM) (PB + 13.6) *
VMMD (TM + 460)
100 - PMOS a/
100
where:
PERI = percent isokinetic sampling rate
TS = stack temperature (°F)
VMSTD = volume dry gas sampled, standard conditions (dscf)
VS = stack gas velocity (fpm)
TT = net sampling time (rain)
PS = stack pressure, absolute (in. Hg)
MD = mole fraction, dry gas
DN = probe tip diameter (in.)
VM = volume dry gas sampled, meter conditions (dcf)
PB = barometric pressure (in. Hg)
PM = orifice pressure drop (in. HO)
TM = meter temperature (°F)
PMOS = percent stack gas moisture, by volume
a/ From Federal Register.—'
I/
174
-------
PM
PERI =
- (I»Q32) (TS + 460) (17.71) (VM) (PB + 13.6)
(VS) (TT) (PS) (MD) (DN)2 (TM + 460)
2~
(PERI) (TT) (DN)
(1,032) (17.71)
[(MD)]
(VS) (TM + 460)
(TS + 460)
_ (PERI) (VS) (TT) (PS) (MD) (DN) (TM + 460)
PM as TT-T « PB; PB ~ PS
(1,032) (TS + 460) (17.71) (PB + 13.6)
VM =
Known for given test:
PERI = 100
TT = 5
DN
Known for given day:
MD (based on preliminary or previous day)
Known for each stack:
VS
Known for each 5-min sampling period:
TM
TS
Thus for each incremental sampling period, a volume to be sam-
pled can be determined, approximating isolcinetic sampling for each per-
iod, stack, and run.
175
-------
APPENDIX I
TABLE OF METRIC EQUIVALENTS
176
-------
To convert from
inch (in.)
foot (ft)
square inches (sq in.)
square feet (sq ft)
cubic inches (cu in.)
cubic feet (cu ft)
pounds (lb)
pounds per cubic foot (pcf)
degrees Fahrenheit (°F)
British Thermal Units (BTU)
calories per gram per degrees
centigrade (cal/g/°G)
To
centimeter (cm)
meter (m)
square meters (sq m)
square meters (sq m)
cubic meters (cu m)
cubic meters (cu m)
kilograms (kg)
kilograms per cubic meter (kg/ cu m)
degrees Gelsious (°C)
calories (cal)
joules per gram per degrees centigrade
(joules/g/°C)
Multiply by
2.540 E-00
3.048 E-01
6.542 E-04
9.290 E-02
1.639 E-05
2.832 E-02
4.536 E-01
1.602 E+01
t - 32
2.52 E+02
4.185 E-00
------- |