SUMMARY REPORT
           JUNE 1973

     HYDROCARBONS IN POLLUTED AIR

     COORDINATING RESEARCH COUNCIL
         PROJECT CAPA-5-68
  Edgar R. Stephens, Principal Investigator
   Professor of Environmental Science
   Statewide Air Pollution Research Center
       University of California
      Riverside, California 92502
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
STATEWIDE
AIR POLLUTION
RESEARCH  CENTER  .
RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA  92502

-------
             SUMMARY REPORT
                JUNE 1973

      HYDROCARBONS IN POLLUTED AIR

     COORDINATING RESEARCH COUNCIL
            PROJECT CAPA-5-68

Edgar R. Stephens, Principal Investigator
   Professor of Environmental Science
  Statewide Air Pollution Research Center
         University of California
       Riverside, California  92502

-------
                          CONTENTS
                                                        PAGE
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS  	   ii
PROCEDURES & ANALYSIS  	    1
     Freeze Out Trap  	    2
     Calibration  	    7
     Precision  	    9
     Sensitivity  	    9
     Sampling  	   10
     Irradiation  	   12
     Stirred Flow  	   13
RESULTS IN AMBIENT AIR  	   20
     Smog Hydrocarbons  	   20
     Background Hydrocarbons  	   23
     Unreacted Air  	   25
     Other Sources  	   35
     Gasoline Vaporization  	   41
     Hydrocarbons in Other Locations  	   48
HYDROCARBON REACTIVITY
     Ambient Air Irradiation  	   54
     Auto Exhaust Irradiation  	   59
     Extent of Reaction  	   59
MODES OF REACTION  	   67
REFERENCES	   75

-------
                       LIST OF FIGURES
                                                         PAGE
 1.  Gas Chromatograph                                     1
 2.  Chromatogram of Ambient Air Hydrocarbons              5
     on Dimethyl Sulfolane Column
 3.  Chromatogram of Ambient Hydrocarbons on Porapak N     5
 4.  Ambient Air Chromatogram of Aromatics (Number 3)      6
 5.  Bottle Photoreactor                                  13
 6.  Photolysis of NO-                                    14
 7.  Flow Photoreactor                                    14a
 8.  Meatless Adsorption Air Purification                 15
 9.  Purging Bottle Reactor                               18
10.  Purging Bottle Reactor                               19
11.  Hydrocarbons in Polluted Air                         20
12.  Pure Mountain Air                                    23
13.  Hydrocarbons in Unreacted Morning Air                25
14.  Methane and Acetylene in Morning Air                 27
15.  Hydrocarbons in Morning Air                          28
16.  Auto Exhaust Components in Morning Air               29
17.  Natural Gas in Morning Air                           30
18.  Natural Gas                                          31
19.  Auto Exhaust                                         33
20.  Gasoline                                             34
21.  Blow By Gas                                          35
22.  Brush Fire Smoke                                     36
23.  Oil Field Air                                        36
24.  Hydrocarbon Distribution Near Sources                37
25.  Hydrocarbons in Polluted Air                         38
26.  Smog and Heat in Riverside                           39
27.  Hydrocarbons in Polluted Air (Hill)                  40
28.  Hydrocarbons in Polluted Air (Roof)                  40
29.  Comparison of Hydrocarbon Distributions              41
30.  Vapor/Liquid Computation                             46
31.  Gasoline Vapor                                       47
32.  Vaporized Gasoline                                   47
33.  Photoreactivity of Hydrocarbons                      51

-------
                    LIST OF FIGURES (Cont)

                                                         PAGE
34.  Hydrocarbons in Morning Air                          54
35.  Natural Sunlight Irradiation of                      56
     Ambient Air 10-24-66
36.  Ultraviolet Irradiation of Ambient                   56
     Air 10-24-66
37.  Sunlight Irradiation of Ambient Air                  56
     Hydrocarbons Reacted 10-24-66
38.  Ultraviolet Irradiation of Auto Exhaust              56
39.  Ambient Air Photolysis 10-24-66                      61
40.  Ambient Air Photolysis 12-21-67                      61
41.  Ambient Air Photolysis                               62
42.  Extent of Photolysis of Ambient Air                  63
43.  Ultraviolet Irradiation in 20 Liter Bottle           70

-------
                        LIST  OF  TABLES
                                                         PAGE
.. 1.  Trapping Efficiency                                   3
  2.  Columns and  Chromatographic  Conditions                4
  3.  Riverside  Smog                    ,                    8
  4.  Ultraviolet  Irradiation of Ambient Air               10
  5.  Hydrocarbon  Removal by  Two Column                   16
     Heatless Fractionator
  6.  Hudrocarbons                                        21
  7.  Methane in Clear Mountain  Air                        24
  8.  Natural Gas  in Ambient  Air                          32
  9.  Molar Ratio  of Ethene  (C H ) to Acetylene            32
     (C.H_) and Propene (C_H,)  to Acetylene  in
        2.  2.                Jo
     Various Samples of Unreacted Air
 10.  Hydrocarbons - Vapor, Liquid                        48
 11.  Relative Rates of  Disappearance of                   58
     Hydrocarbons Under Irradiation
 12.  Estimate of  Amounts Reacted  in an Ambient            66
     Air  Sample Compared to  an  Unreacted  Sample
 13.  Riverside  Ambient  Air  (PPB)  on Roof  of               66
     Health-Finance Building
 14.  PBzN Formation at  High  Concentrations                71
 15.  Reactivity of Aromatic  Hydrocarbons  in  the           72
     Flor Photoreactor
 16.  Reactions  of Nitrogen Trioxide                       74

-------
Forward:
     This project was begun in July 1968 as a continuation of earlier
studies on ambient air hydrocarbons supported by a grant from the American
Petroleum Institute.  Some of the work has been reported in the published
literature (see reference list).  The data presented in these papers is
summarized but not reported in detail in this report.  The following were
members of the project advisory committee:  R. G. Larsen, H. E. ALquist,
P. R. Ryason, C. S. Tuesday, A. P. Altshuller, J. C. Neerman and J. M.
Heuss.
Acknowledgment
     Mr. Frank Burleson did the bulk of the laboratory work reported
here.  Long path infrared studies were carried out by Mr. Monty Price
and Mr. William Snider.  Mrs. Minn Poe developed the computer program.
We are also indebted to those persons who collected samples in distant
locations.

-------
                                   11
Summary & Conclusions

     Flame ionization chromatography provides a satisfactory procedure
for analysis of hydrocarbons in polluted air.  By freezing out the
hydrocarbons present in a 100 ml sample of polluted air, concentrations
as low as 0.1-0.2 ppb can be detected.  With careful calibration and
attention to detail, accuracy and precision of a few percent can be
attained at levels of a few tens of ppb.  Three instruments, with three
different columns, were used to analyze about three dozen hydrocarbons.
The small sample requirement permitted shipment of samples from many
locations around the country and some from overseas.
     The two main objectives of the study were to compare the distribu-
tion of hydrocarbons in the atmosphere with those observed in sources
and to estimate the degree to which hydrocarbons of different reactivity
participate in the photoreaction.  Typical photochemical smog hydrocar-
bons can be described as auto exhaust plus gasoline vapors plus natural
gas (in addition to background methane of 1.39 ppm).  Spilled gasoline,
as opposed to vaporized gasoline, does not seem to play a significant
role.   Samples taken near specific sources (petrochemical plants, brush
fires, oil fields) show distinctly different distributions.   Afternoon
smog samples show substantial attenuation of the more reactive hydrocar-
bons (specifically the olefins).  By studying the relative amounts of
acetylene, ethene and propene it was possible to estimate the extent and
time of reaction.   It was concluded that oxidant smog as seen in Riverside
has undergone six to eight hours of photochemical reaction.   Irradiation
produces continued reaction for 24 hours or more.   In six to eight hours
of irradiation even hydrocarbons of low reactivity participate in the
reaction; after the first hour or so the olefins of high reactivity are
gone and further reaction depends on hydrocarbons of medium and low
reactivity present in much larger quantity.   The practical conclusion is
that reduction in the already low concentrations of the highly reactive
olefins will not have much practical effect.
     During the course of this research program, reports came out which
indicated that the higher aromatics (CL )  were much more reactive than
previously thought.   Irradiation of ambient air mixtures confirmed the

-------
                                 iii
modernte reactivity of these compounds.  Meanwhile it was reported that
benzilic hydrocarbons could be oxidized under atmospheric conditions to
the potent eye irritant peroxybenzoyl nitrate.  This suggested that one
active species attacks the aromatic side chain while some different
species attacks the ring.  Tests were made to see if the side chain
attack could be due to nitrogen trioxide.  High concentration experiments
in a long path cell indicated that this could be so but yields were small
and rates were slow.  No reaction could be detected at realistic (ppb)
concentrations.

-------
PROCEDURES & ANALYSIS

     Three gas chromatographs are used with four  procedures  to
quantitate about three dozen individual hydrocarbons  in ambient  air
samples.  Three of the four procedures require a  freeze out  of  the
hydrocarbons from a 100 milliliter air sample.  The fourth procedure
uses a 3 milliliter loop sample to analyze methane.   Figure  1
illustrates the freeze out procedure.   Samples are injected  with a
100 milliliter glass medical syringe into a gas sample  valve on
which the normal sample loop is replaced by a freeze  trap packed
with chromatographic packing.  No attempt is made to  remove  either
water or carbon dioxide from the sample prior to  freeze out.  A
bubble meter or syringe on the output  side of the gas sample valve
can be used to verify the fact that all the sample has, indeed,
passed through the trap.   Liquid oxygen is used to chill the packed
freeze trap since it has a temperature sufficiently low to collect
even such hydrocarbon gases as ethane, ethylene and acetylene, but
not low enough to collect significant  quantities  of oxygen.  If  liquid
nitrogen were used as the coolant oxygen would be collected  from the

                          GAS CHROMATOGRAPH





PACKED
FREEZE
TRAP
4



f~~~
U 	
n
\
-
=
~
m
>
BUBBLE
METER




V T
LIQUID O/
Ml * ii -^=3.
™n
Q*FLAME DETECTOR
1
1
"1
I
- 1 1
1 l 1
•!in i
-H 1
COLUMN
i
^^k
f

^=^
'
ICE BATH
in DEWAR
«-O A DDICD
L-Ljj 	 1 GAS
\
100 ml SYRINGE GAS SAMPLE

VALVE
                              FIGURE 1

-------
air sample and injected into the column along with the hydrocarbons.
This would snuff the flame.  Liquid argon could be used since its boil-
ing point is very close to that of liquid oxygen.  A third alternative
would be to chill with liquid nitrogen and then to purge the trap
with nitrogen or with helium prior to thawing and injection into the
column.  Injection into the column is accomplished by thawing the
trap and simultaneously pushing the gas sample valve.  Samples are then
carried quickly into one of the three columns.  Instrument No. 1, with
the freeze out procedure, gives C  through approximately C  hydrocarbons
                                 J                        D
plus acetylene.  Instrument No. 2, with the freeze out procedure, gives
ethane, ethene and acetylene.  To measure methane, the freeze trap on
this instrument is replaced by' a sample loop and a 3 milliliter
sample directly injected.  The third instrument gives principally
aromatic hydrocarbons plus acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, acetone
and methyl ethyl ketone.  Alpha and beta pinene also emerge from
this column, but they are not well separated from the aromatic hydro-
carbons.  Table 2 summarizes the columns and chromatographic procedures.

Freeze Out Trap
    Freeze out traps were prepared by packing 20 cm lengths of stainless
(2.34 mm I.D. [1/8 inch OD]) steel tubing with a chromatographic substrate
consisting of 10% dimethyl su^folane on 42/60 mesh C-22 firebrick or with
glass heads.  Each tube was bent into a "U" shape and attached to the gas
sample valve of a chromatograph in place of the sample loop.  The sample inlet and
outlet of each sample valve were equipped with toggle valves.  Although these
freeze out methods had been found to be highly efficient by other workers
it remained to be proved that the specific technique in present use was
also quantitative.  This was done by analyzing a synthetic mixture
containing about 1 ppm of each of several hydrocarbons, first using a
direct sample loop injection, then by diluting the same volume of the
mixture to 100 ml and using the freeze trap.  The area under each peak
was measured and divided by the carbon number to obtain a sensitivity
factor as shown in Table 1.  Although these trap samples were consist-
ently smaller than the corresponding peaks from the loop injection by
about 15%,  the fact that the area per carbon atom was independent of

-------
hydrocarbon volatility  suggests that this discrepancy results  from

inaccuracy in  the measurement  or delivery of volumes rather than a

failure  to capture  all  the hydrocarbon.   Dead  space  in  the valve

and  connecting tubes may  account for this difference.    In any  event

the  freeze-out procedure  was used  for calibration and quite repro-

ducible  results were obtained,  as  can be  seen  by examining some

replicates in  Table 4.
                            Table 1 —Trapping Efficiency—Area
                            per  Carbon  Atoms  (Si)  for  Loop
                                Sample and Two Trapping
                                       Techniques

                                   Trap  Trap
                             Com-  (pull)  (push)  Loop Si (loop)
                            pounds  Si     Si    Si  Si (trap)

                            Ethane  0.153  0.153  0.169   1.10
                            Ethene  0.142  0.143  0.164   1.14
                            Propaae 0.145  0.146  0.169   1.16
                            Propene 0.131  0.132  0.158   1.19
                             Total  0.571  0.574  0.660
                            Propane 0.113  0.111  0.115   1.02
                            Propene 0.109  0.104  0.134   1.23
                            ri-butane 0.113  0.114  0.129   1.14
                            Acetyl-
                             ene   0.145  0.132  0.157   1.07
                            1-butene 0.115  0.107  0.133   1.16
                            lru.na-1-
                             butene 0.114  0.106  0.129   1.13
                            cis-2-
                             butene 0.115  0.106  0.131   1.14
                            1,3-buta-
                             diene  0.112  0.102  0.127   1.13
                            Methyl
                             acetyl-
                             ene   0.109  0.101  0.122   1.12
                            cis-2-
                             Pen-
                             tene   0.125  0.109  0.153   1.22
                             Total  1.170  1.092  1.3IM)

                             Xote: First 4 compounds separated on
                            chromatOf$raph No. 2;  remainder  on
                            chromatograph No. 1.
                             Loop:  2.9 ml.volume
                             Trap:  2.9 ml diluted to 100 ml N- and
                               frozen in trap

-------
          TABLE 2.  Columns and Chromatographic Conditions
NUMBER 1
     Column:  11 meters by 2.34 mm I.D. (1/8 inch OD stainless tube)
containing 10% dimethyl sulfolane on 42/60 mesh C-22 firebrick
maintained at 0 C plus 0.46 meters by 2.34 mm I.D. stainless tube
containing 10% carbowax E-600 on 42/60 mesh C-22 firebrick at room
temperature to minimize background due to column bleed.  Background
signal at full sensitivity was about 4.3 mv.  Carrier gas:  22 ml/min
of dry nitrogen.  Flame detector:  24 ml/min hydrogen and 287 ml/min
oxygen.  Wilkens Model 600 chromatograph.
     This column gave good separation of acetylene, C  and C, olefins
and paraffins, C_ paraffins, some of the C,. olefins and Cfi paraffins,
as well as 1,3-butadiene, methyl acetylene and cyclopentane.  Figure 2

NUMBER 2
     Column:  1.52 meters by 2.34 mm I.D. (1/8 inch O.D. stainless
tube) containing activated alumina held at 60 C.  Carrier gas:  40
ml/min nitrogen.  Flame detector:  40 ml/min hydrogen and 287 ml/min
oxygen.  Wilkens Model 600 chromatograph.  Background signal at full
sensitivity was 4.3 mv.  Retention times and .therefore peak heights
were variable depending (apparently) on the moisture content of the
carrier gas.  This was therefore replaced by the following:
     Column:  1.52 meters by 2.34 mm I.D. (1/8 inch O.D.) filled with
Poropak N (100/120 mesh), operated at 60°C with a carrier flow of 80
ml/min of nitrogen and 60 ml/min of H~ and 410 ml/min of 0 .  This gave
a good separation of ethane, ethene and acetylene in a two minute
chromatogram.  Methane is not frozen out by these procedures but could
be determined by direct injection of an air sample using a three ml loop.
Since the worldwide background level of methane is nearly 1.4 ppm
there is no need for the high sensitivity provided by the freeze-out
procedures.  This does mean, however, that a third chromatogram is
required.  Air samples gave negative responses, apparently due to
oxygen, just ahead of the methane peak.  Comparison of calibrations
in nitrogen and in air showed that this caused no interference with
the methane measurement.  Figure 3

-------
                                          CONCENTRATIONS IN ppJ
     1 mv -I mv
     # » 2 H * B
  •           w
  u.     	l M
                5          10
                ;; 5 -, = !S « *  -8
                b b b * '- o e>  o i.
                                       IS
                                                  10
             25
                         30
        Fig. 2.  Chromotogrom of ambient air hydrocarbons on dimethyl uilfolan* column.
     100ml
                   ethene x8
                   43.2 ppb
                      ethane x4
                      28.8 ppb
5  PORAPAK N
                            acetylene  x8
                                 60 ppb
                                         methane x 16
                                         2388 ppb
                                      2.9ml
                         MINUTES

Fig.  3.   Chromatogram of Ambient Hydrocarbons on Porapak

-------
                                   6
TABLE 2 (continued)
NUMBER 3
     Column:  3.048 meters by 2.34 mm  I.D.  (1/8  inch  O.D.  stainless
tube) filled with 5% of 1,2,3 tris  (2-cyanoethoxy)  propane plus
1.52 meters by 2.34 mm I.D. tube  filled with  5%  bentone34  and 5%
dinonyl phthalate both on 100/120 mesh  HMDS treated gas  chrom W
plus 0.915 meters by 2.34 mm I.D. filled with 10% carbowax E 600
on C-22 firebrick 30/60 mesh.  Carrier gas  was 38 ml  N^/min.   Fuel
flow:  25 ml H2/min with300 ml/min  of  oxygen.  A freeze out trap
containing uncoated glass beads was used with this  instrument.
It was used to measure aromatic hydrocarbons  through  C9.   Alpha and
beta pinene, acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, acetone and methyl
ethyl ketone could also be measured.   See  Figure 4.
                                         I.I.* TRMffnirL UNZBNB 1.4
                                                            I.I TlMCTtYL UKZB4I O.I
                               FIGURE 4
          Ambient Air Chromatogram of Aromatics  (Number 3)

-------
Trapping efficiency was also verified by collecting a sample which
had been passed through the freeze out trap in a second 100 milli-
meter syringe.  This sample was then re-analyzed and found to
contain only 0.2 ppb of ethane and ethene, although the input sample
had contained 7.2 ppb and 8.0 ppb respectively of these hydrocarbons.
The re-analyzed sample also contained fractional ppb concentrations
of oxygenates.

Calibration
     Emergence times are used to identify individual hydrocarbons
on the chromatograms and peak heights are used to estimate concen-
trations which have always been reported in parts per billion by
volume.  A transparent overlay chart is used for rapid reading of
peaks.

-------
     Calibration mixtures are prepared by successive dilutions of
pure hydrocarbons into modified two liter Erlenmeyer flasks.  These
flasks have a stopcock attached to the drawn down neck, a three-way
stopcock near the base and an injection port made from a ball and
socket joint in the body of the flask.
     Two such flasks are flushed with pure air or nitrogen.   Two
ml of each gaseous hydrocarbon is then added to the first flask from
a small syringe.  This gives about 1000 ppm in this flask.  Liquid
hydrocarbons are added from microliter pipettes.  The amount is
calculated from the handbook value of the density and the molecular
weight.  After mixing, two ml of this mixture is transferred to the
second flask with a ground glass medical syringe.  A number of
hydrocarbons can be injected into the first flask at about 1000 ppm.
A single transfer to a second flask then will yield a mixture of
those hydrocarbons at 1 ppm.  Although the flasks are open to the
room air during the transfer of gases, there is no significant loss
to the atmosphere if the flask's temperature and pressure are the
same as that of the room.  Five ml of this mixture diluted to 100 ml
in a syringe then produces a calibration mixture containing about
50 ppb of each hydrocarbon.  (The exact concentration will, of course,
depend on the exact volumes of liquid and gas taken and the exact
volumes of the dilution flask.)
                               TABLE 3
                RIVERSIDE SMOG      1610 PST 10-24-68
                        (TWELVE SAMPLES, PPB)
             Instrument  1                         Instrument 2
                  C         a                          C         a
PROPENE         1.27      0.1         METHANE        2530      30
PROPANE        49.9       2.2         	
ISOPENTANE     41.2       1.5         ETHANE         72.2       2.3
N-HEXANE        8.3       0.4         ETHENE         17.9       1.2
ACETYLENE      41.3       1.3         ACETYLENE      42.8       1.5

-------
 Precision
     Table   3   shows  the precision which can be attained with these
 methods.  This  table  gives the average concentration  (C) and the
 standard deviation  (a)  for a  set of twelve ambient air samples of
 unusual uniformity.
     At the  highest concentrations, the relative standard deviation
 is  just over 1% (CH,).  In the range of 10's of ppb,  it is 3 to 5%
 while at the 1  ppb  level it is near 1070.  This of  course also depends
 on  the particular peak.  For  propane at 1.27 ppb,  the standard
 deviation was 0.1 ppb.  These standard deviation values reflect both
 the measurement precision and the variation between the twelve samples.
 If  the acetylene values from  the two instruments differ by more than
 about 10% at the 40 ppb level, a search is begun for  some malfunction
 of  one of the instruments.  In Table  3  the acetylene values differ
 by  only 1.5  ppb (about 47»).
     Stability  of hydrocarbon concentrations while stored in these
 sample tubes was verified by  repeating analyses after one or more
 days of standing.   Table  4   compares concentrations  of hydrocarbon
 samples taken in 20 liter carboys.  These two samples were taken on
 the second .floor and  on the roof of the Riverside  County Health-Finance
 Building.  The  roof top sample was stored in the dark and showed no
 change after 24 hours.  The second floor sample was nearly identical
 and was irradiated  24 hours with the results shown in Table  4.

 Sensitivity
     When operating properly, minimum detectable peaks for short
 emergence  time   compounds corresponds to 0.1-0.2 ppb  (for 100 ml
 freeze out).   Compounds with  longer retention times have broader
 peaks and therefore the minimum detectable concentrations are a
 few tenths or one ppb.  This decrease in sensitivity with emergence
 time would be more pronounced if concentration were expressed by
weight.   Larger  samples could easily be used to attain higher sensi-
 tivities.

-------
                                             10
Tobla 4 —Ultraviolet Irradiation of Ambient Air Riverside County Building of Health and Finance, 3/3/66,08:05-
08:25 PST, Sky Clear, Wind 5-7 mph, N.W., 40-45°F, Moderatiy Heavy Haze (Smudge)
Compounds
Ethane
Ethene
Propane
Pro perm
Propane
Propeue
Isobutane
rt-butane
Acetylene
1-butene
Isobatene
pentene

Roof
Top
Sample
3<>.o
45.6
14.0
14.0
12.0
14.0
7.0
41.6
62.4
2.0
4.0
.1.0
2.5.4
1.0
17.0
2.0
2.0
0.6
1.4
2.0
l.S
~0.6
7.6
6.8
•2.0
6.6
2.4

45 min
Dark
38.0
45.6
14.0
13.8
12.4
13.8
7.0
41.6
62.4
2.0
4.0
1.2
25.4
1.2
17.0
2.0
2.0
0.6
1.2
2.4
1.6
~0.6
7.6
7.4
2.4
6.4
2.2

24 hr
Dark
37.6
48.8
15.0
15.4
12.2
11.6
6.8
41.6
61.6
2.0
3.4
1.2
25.2
1.2
16.8
2.0
2.0
0.6
1.4
2.0
1.6
—
7.4
6.8
1.8
6.6
2.2

2nd
Floor
Sample
37.6
51.2
14.6
15.6
13.0
13.4
7.4
44.8
69.6
2.2
4.0
1.4
27.6
1.0
18.6
2.4
2.0
0.6
1.0
2.0
1.6
~1.2
8.4
8.0
1.4
7.2
2.4
-Concentration in ppb
1 hr 2 hr
Irrad. Irrad.
uv uv
37.6
45.6
14.2
11.0
12.8
9.4
7.0
43.2
69.6
1.4
2.4
0.4
26.0
0.4
17.4
1.0
2.0
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.6
~0.7
7.6
4.8
l.S
6.6
1.4
.'!<>. 0
40. S
. 12.6
7.6
12.2
6.6
6.8
40.8
65.6
1.0
1.4
0.0
24.6
0.0
16.2
0.6
1.8
0.4
O.S
0.4
0.0
~0.9
7.4
4.2
2.0
5.8
1.0

4hr
Irrad.
uv
37. «
:?6.o
13.6
4.4
11.8
3.8
6.6
39.2
64.8
0.6
0.8
0.0
22.8
0.0
15.4
0.0
2.0
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.0
~O.S
6.6
3.6
1.6
5.6
0.4

8hr
Irrad.
uv
36.0
27.2
12.8
2.2
11.2
1.4
5.8
33.1
60.0
0.4
0.6
0.0
19.2
0.0
12.4
0.0
1.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
~0.6
5.7
3.4
1.4
4.6
0.6

20 hr
Irrad.
uv
35.2
1(1. 0
12.2
1.4
10.2
O.S
5.0
28.0
56.8
0.4
0.6
0.0
14.4
0.0
9.4
0.0
1.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
~0.8
4.0
2 2
O.S
3.0
0.4

24 hr
Irrad.
uv
35.2
12.6
114
1.4
10.4
0.6
4.S
27.2
56.8
0.4
0.4
0.0
13.6
0.0
8.8
0.0
1.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
~1.0
3.6
2.2
1.0
3.4
0.0
 .Vy/f.v First 4 compounds separated on chromatograph No. 2; remainder on chromatograph No. 1.
 » Contains 3-methyl butene-l.
 11 Contains CM-2-pentene.
 c Contains 2-methvl butene-2.
         Sampling
              In the  first work not enough  attention was paid to the influence
         of sampling.   While it is possible to measure hydrocarbons in a  100
         ml sample  of air with good precision and accuracy (if not completeness)
         to be at all useful these data  must be used to  infer the composition
         of some larger air mass.  The hazards involved  in this inferential
         process are  sometimes underestimated.  They are especially important
         in analyzing light hydrocarbons in ambient air  at ground level which
         is the most  convenient sampling location.  An ideal system would be
         one  in which the entire air  parcel of interest  (this might be several
         cubic miles) could be homogenized before measurement.  The next  best
         ideas is to  choose a sampling area removed from sources and to average
         a number of  samples.  The separate analyses can then be used  to

-------
                                   11
 estimate the homogeneity  of  the  air  parcel.   On  the  other hand,
 fluctuations from sample  to  sample can  also be useful.  Hydrocarbons
 which come from a common  source  must fluctuate together in
 concentration,  while  those which derive from  different sources
 will  not normally correlate  well with each other.  This technique
 was used to identify  natural gas in  urban air (see later).
      Standard sample  tubes of 300 ml to 1 liter  in volume were used
 to sample in remote locations.   It was  convenient to  transport or
 ship  a dozen such tubes in a box.  These tubes were  fitted with a
 stopcock at each end  and  were filled by flushing with a rubber
 suction squeeze bulb.  The sample, therefore, did not pass through
 the squeeze bulb.  Laboratory evacuation of the  sample tubes was
 avoided because there was no way to  verify vacuum maintenance during
 transport to a  distant sampling  site.   To transfer a  sample into the
 freeze trap, a  100 ml syringe was filled with pure nitrogen, attached
 to the sample tube, the stopcock opened, and  the sample and nitrogen
 mixed by working the  syringe plunger back and forth a number of times.
 Tests were made to ensure that no significant leakage occurred during
 this  process.   The volume of the sample tube  was used to calculate
 the degree of dilution that  occurs in this process.   After closing
 the stopcock the sample syringe  was  then connected to the gas sample
 valve on the chromatograph and the contents forced through the
 chilled trap.   This procedure could  be  repeated  several times so
 actually several 100  ml samples  could be taken from sample tubes
 as small as 300 ml.   Of course,  the  dilution  factor becomes larger
 and larger as more samples are taken and this limits  the process.
 Quite reproducible results can be obtained even  at the low concen-
 trations of ambient polluted air.
      Samples taken at temperatures and/or pressures different from
those  prevailing in the laboratory must  be first  brought to laboratory
 pressure (about 1200  feet above  sea  level) by adding  measured amounts
 of pure nitrogen from a 100  ml syringe  or by  venting  the tube.  The
 empty syringe is then attached to one inlet of the gas sample valve
 on the chromatograph  while the sample tube is attached to the other.

-------
                                   12
With the valve in the sample position, the contents of sample bulb
and 3 ml sample loop are mixed.  This sample is injected into the
chromatograph to provide a methane measurement.  If nitrogen was
added to bring the tube to laboratory pressure, a correction is
made for this dilution.
     Larger samples of ambient air were taken in 20 liter (5 gal.)
and 50 liter (12 gal.) borosilicate glass carboys.  To provide an
inert closure for these vessels, a special lid was devised.   The
mouth of the carboy was ground flat and a 1/4 inch thick glass disc
containing epoxy cemented borosilicate glass inlet and outlet tubes
was waxed on with fluorocarbon wax.  One of the tubes extended to the
bottom of the bottle, and the other into the top.  In this way a
suction pump could be used to purge the bottle and flush it with
sample in a few minutes.  A larger port, closed by a ball joint, was
cemented in the lid and used for syringe or micropipet injection of
standard samples.  Samples in this bottle were in contact with glass
almost exclusively with only minimum amounts of epoxy cement and
fluorocarbon wax.

Irradiation
     This bottle and an irradiation system which was used to irradiate
ambient air samples is shown in Figure  5.
     Twelve "blacklite" fluorescent lamps (15 watts each) were mounted
in a framework as a vertical cylinder large enough to contain one of
the bottles.  A ventilation fan mounted below the bottle served to limit
the temperature rise to 1 or 2 C.  The light intensity in the center of
the irradiation system was tested by photolyzing nitrogen dioxide at
0.5-5 mm Hg pressure in an ultraviolet absorption cell.  Concentrations
were then measured in a Gary Model 14 ultraviolet spectrophotometer.
The half-life of nitrogen dioxide measured in this way was 1.3 min.
These results are shown in Figure  6.
     This half life is somewhat longer than that calculated and observed
for outside sunlight on the brightest day (about 1 min.).  This system
was used to irradiate ambient air  samples which were taken in early

-------
                                    13
 BLACKLIGHT
J  / LAMPS
                    us
           m
                                          20 LITER CARBOY
                                          BLACKLIGHT
                                          LAMPS
                                               \
                          BOTTLE PHOTOREACTOR
                                FIGURE 5
morning hours after  a  good  purge of the atmosphere.  Two such  carboys
were available  so  simultaneous  samples could be taken and irradiated
in natural sunlight  and  artificial light.
Stirred Flow
     This system which  originally employed 20 liter carboys and  static
irradiation techniques, was  later elaborated to use a 50 1 carboy and

-------
                                  14
           o
           2
           <
           00
           cr
           w
           00
 0.10
 0.09
 0.08

 0.07

 0.06

0.05


0.04
              0.03
                                    PHOTOLYSIS  OF  N02
                                     I mm  Hg, 10 cm cellx
                                      GARY  MODEL-14  /
                                          BOTTLE REACTOR
                                           12-15  WATT
                                           BLACK LIGHTS
                                           (W/0 ALUMINUM
                                                    FOIL)
                                              2/25/66
1.28 min
                       0                I
                                 TIME  (minutes)
                              FIGURE 6
a stirred flow system.   One borosilicate glass reaction vessel is
mounted inside a set of  24-black  light fluorescent lamps as irradia-
tion source.   These have been mounted on a cart along with supply
tanks and flow and mixing  equipment to supply the reactor.  Included
on the cart,  in addition to the bottle photoreactor itself, are a
heatless air  dryer for air purification, supply tanks for the react-
ants, a flow  mixing panel  consisting of the flowmeters and suitable
needle valves and space  for analytical equipment (see Figure  7 ).
The supply tanks are low pressure oxygen tanks, each of which is
equipped with a pressure reduction regulator which feeds into a

-------
                                    14a
                              MIXING
                             CHAMBER
                                                            THREE WAY
                                                            STOP COCK
  ROTOMETERS
FINE METERING
VALVES
   FLOW
   REGULATORS-
COMPRESSED
AIR SUPPLY
AIR LINE
DRYER
                                                    FLUORESCENT
                                                    BLACK LITES
                                             OUTLET
                                                   SHUTOFF
                                                   VALVES
                                                              46.9 LITER
                                                              BOROSILICATE
                                                              BOTTLE
                        SHUTOFF
                       -VALVES
           AIR SUPPLY
           HYDROCARBON
            REMOVAL
  STAINLESS STEEL .
LOW PRESSURE TANKS

-------
                                  15
                            PRODUCT
                         (DRY AIR  OUT)
                                       ;CHECK  VALVES




DRYING
CHAMBERS




B














RECYCLE
TIME*
—

\


i
^

i
r
£

PURGE
VALVE












WET
AIR
OUT

<-:

X*
^~
WET

%

^
i
[
\>
s


'

k






•'.".'• *••**.'.'







A





SOLENOID VALVE

UR IN
                              FIGURE 8
                 Heatless Adsorbtion Air Purification
manifold in a flow mixing panel.  Needle valves are used  for  flow
regulation.   Four  such  tanks are mounted on the cart along with
their valves and the  flow panel.  The heatless air dryer  used  for
air purification is 3/4 filled with activated charcoal  and 1/4 with
the manufacturer's desiccant.  This modification,  as recommended by W. H.
King of Esso Research,  permits production of very  pure  hydrocarbon-free
air.  One column of the dryer adsorbs air pollutants in the char-
coal while the other  is being purged.  It operates on a 30-second
cycle and produces air  with hydrocarbon concentration reduced  to

-------
                                    16
 the low ppb range.   This  is  important  since  the ambient air  in
 Riverside already contains concentrations  in excess of those that we
 wish to study.   The flow  system has been designed  to have a  residence
 time variable from one-half  to  four hours.   To accomplish this, a
 portion of the  supply stream of dilute reactant can be diverted away
 from the bottle and used  for an input  analysis.  This permits analysis
 of input and output streams  simultaneously.   Table 5  gives  performance
 data on the air purifier.
                                TABLE 5
              HYDROCARBON   REMOVAL   BY   TWO   COLUMN
                         MEATLESS   FRACTIQNATOR
HYDROCARBON
METHANE
ETHENE
ETHANE
ACETYLENE
PROPANE
PROPENE
ISOBUTANE
n-BUTANE
CONCENTR
Unfiltered
) N Ambient Air
2,028
9.4
23.2
11.. 6, 11.2
13.4
1.4
4.8
13.4
ATION ppb
Filtered
Air
1,058
0.6
1.4
1.2, 1..4
1..6
0.4
0.1.
0.2

-------
                                   17
     This reactor was designed primarily to study the reactions of
aromatics at the realistic concentration range.  In such circum-
stances the question of loss of reactants by adsorption on the wall
of the reactor is usually raised.  This is especially important when
compounds of low volatility are being studied.  In a tube flow
system used on an earlier project it was found that adsorptions of
light hydrocarbons or even of PAN on clean reactor walls was not a
significant factor.  This type of experiment was repeated with
toluene and acetylene in the new flow reactor.  With  254 ppb of
toluene in the bottle a steady flow of 0.86 liter/min of pure air
was used to purge the bottle.  Chromatographs#2 and #3 were used to
monitor the acetylene and toluene concentrations with time.  Multi-
plication of the reactor volume by the concentration of toluene
gives the amount of toluene present initially in the gas phase
(11,900 nl as a vapor, see Figure  9  ).  Integration of the purg-
ing curve in this figure gives the amount of toluene removed from
the reactor (11,280 nl in Figure  9  ).  Since these two figures agree
we conclude that little toluene was desorbed from the reactor surfaces
during purging.  It should be noted that this procedure does not
require an absolute calibration of the chromatograph.
     Data of this type can also be used to evaluate mixing in the
reactor.   Perfect mixing corresponds to exponential dilution and
should follow the equation

                        In C/CQ = -ft

Figure  10   shows a logarithmic plot of acetylene and toluene for this
purge experiment.  Both follow closely the theoretical curve for the
volume and flow rate indicating adequate mixing.

-------
                          18
  250
          254 ppb x 46.9 I = 11,900 nl toluene
UJ
             30
                        PURGING  BOTTLE
                            REACTOR
                         -AREA-= 11,280 nl toluene
 60      90
PURGING TIME.
 120      150
MINUTES
180
                       :'TGU".E 9

-------
                     19
o
o
10


8
                 PURGING  BOTTLE

                      REACTOR
        0 ACETYLENE
                               THEORY

                                46.9 liters

                                0,86  liter/min.
0
            30
60     90

  MINUTES
                              120
150
                       FIGURE 10

-------
                                  20
RESULTS IN AMBIENT AIR

Smog Hydrocarbons
     The pattern of hydrocarbon concentrations as found in Riverside
photochemical smog is quite consistent; changes in the relative amounts
of hydrocarbons are much smaller than the changes in the concentrations
from clean air to smog air.   The analysis taken when a 0.6 ppm oxidant
smog was recorded on 6 August 1970 (a record for that year in Riverside)
is typical (see Figure   11   ).  In this figure and others like it in
this report, the hydrocarbons are plotted according to the listing in
Table 6 .
ppb
60-

50-
40-
30-

20-
B.G. 	
10-
0-
t
_



xlOO
. ;
;
; ;
HYDROCARBONS IN POLLUTED AIR
6 AUG. 1970, I500PST - RECORD SMOG
PPb
IOT
B
n :
Q • s H S H H « H
678889!
FUEL A


•
•
|

a :
1 I I
! i 5
) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
ROMATICS



c
: n H I 1 R 1
23 22334 4444555 4455666656
NATURAL CRACKED FUEL OLEFINS FUEL SATURATES
GAS PRODUCTS
                               FIGURE  11

-------
                                   21
                                TABLE 6

                             HYDROCARBONS
         (By carbon number in the order plotted in bar charts)

Natural Gas (mostly from leaks in natural gas supply pipes)
     1.  Methane
     2.  Ethane
     3.  Propane

Cracked Products (mostly from auto exhaust, not present in gasoline)
     2.  Acetylene
     2.  Ethene
     3.  Propene
     3.  Me-acetylene
     4.  1,3-butadiene

Fuel Olefins (part of the C4's are also derived from cracking)

     4.  1-butene
     4.  isobutene
     4.  trans-2-butene
     4.  cis-2-butene
     5.  2 me-butene-1
     5.  trans-2-pentene
     5.  2 me-butene-2

Fuel Saturates
     4.  isobutane
     4.  n-butane
     5.  isopentane
     5.  n pentane
     6.  2,2 di-me-butane
     6.  2,3 di-me-butane
     6.  2 me-pentane
     6.  3 me-pentane
     5.  cyclopentane
     6.  n-hexane
     N   naphthenes

-------
                                   22
TABLE 6  (continued)

Fuel Aromatics
     6.  Benzene
     7.  Toluene
     8.  Ethyl benzene
     8.  p-xylene
     8.  m-xylene
     8.  o-xylene
     9.  Isopropyl benzene
     9.  n-propyl benzene
     9.  p-ethyl toluene
     9.  m-ethyl toluene
     9.  o-ethyl toluene
     9.  1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
     9.  1,2,4 trimethyl benzene
     9.  1,2,3 trimethyl benzene
 10-12.  Higher aromatics
     The first three paraffins are listed in the figure as natural gas
since leakage of this hydrocarbon mixture seems to be the principal
source for these compounds.  The  "cracked products" are five compounds
not found in gasoline but present in auto exhaust in substantial
quantities.  These form a unique tracer for exhaust gas, since there
are few other significant sources of these five compounds, and also a
useful indicator of degree of reaction since they present a spectrum of
reactivities.  The other three groups are listed as fuel components
because they are present in gasoline.  Small amounts of some of these
are produced in engines:  in particular the four carbon olefins.
     The distribution of hydrocarbons shown here resembles auto exhaust
with natural gas and gasoline vapor added.  This breakdown will be
discussed in more detail in subsequent paragraphs.

-------
                                   23
Background Hydrocarbons
     With the exception of methane,  all  the hydrocarbons shown in
Figure 11 are at far higher concentrations than are  found in
unpolluted air.   To measure background levels, two groups of samples
were taken during March 1968 in the  San  Bernardino and San Gabriel
Mountains of southern California during  moderate  to  fresh Santa
conditions.  These winds blow for several days at a  time across
southern California from the large desert areas to the north and east
and bring the cleanest air to Riverside, California.  These samples
were taken 1000 to 1300 meters above sea level, one  set on the northern
slopes of the San Bernardino Mountains and one set in the San Gabriel
Mountains.  The results are summarized in Figure  12.  The levels of
methane were satisfactorily consistent and gave an average of 1.39 ppm
of methane as shown in Table 7.
ppb ppb
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
10-
n -
20-
10-
0_


1 III
1 III
67888899 999999
FUEL AROMATICS
"PURE MOUNTAIN AIR"
xlOO

1 1 M.l i_i 	 III! Ill | 1 | [ L. 1 |
          123   22334
      NATURAL
        GAS
 CRACKED
PRODUCTS
4444 555
FUEL OLEFINS
4 455666656
 FUEL SATURATES
                               FIGURE  12

-------
                                    24
     To determine  whether some of the observed methane  concentration
might be due  to  contamination from upwind automotive or natural gas
sources, three of  the March 19 samples were analyzed for C~  hydro-
carbons.  Auto exhaust contains methane, ethene and acetylene  in
roughly equal amounts so that the maximum possible methane  contribution
by exhaust  gas can be estimated from the amounts of these two  unsatur-
ated hydrocarbons  present in a sample.  Natural gas contains about
fifteen times as much methane as ethane, permitting the estimation of
the maximum amount of methane contribution from this source.
     Three  ppb of  ethane were present in the three samples,  suggesting
a possible  methane contamination of 0.045 ppm, if the contamination
came from natural  gas sources.   One ppb each of ethene  and acetylene
were present, suggesting a possible methane contamination of 0.001
ppm, if contamination came additionally from automotive sources.   In
either or both events, the addition to the methane concentrations
given in Table    7   could not exceed 0.046 ppm, or a reduction of 3.37».
Whether the presence  of ethane, ethene and acetylene in these  samples
represents  low-level  contamination, or whether they too exist  in a
background  concentration is open to further examination.
     Our value of  1.39 ppm methane can be converted into the spectros-
copist's units by  assuming that this concentration prevails  from sea
level to outer space.   Taking the pressure as one atmosphere and the
temperature at 273 K, we calculate a value of 1.11 cm for the  equivalent
layer of methane.   This agrees  exactly with the figure  reported by Fink
      2
e_t aJL   from  their spectroscopic studies, but is slightly smaller  than
                                            3
the 1.2 cm  reported by Goldberg and Muller.
          Table 7  Methane in clear mountain air.
             Date       Column     Samples   C ppm      
-------
                                   25
Unrpacted Air
     The sample shown in Figure  11  had obviously  undergone  consider-
able photochemical reaction so it was  of interest  to  obtain  distributions
under unreacted conditions.  This can  be done by taking  samples  under
the proper weather conditions.  On some occasions, particularly  during
the winter months, winds from the desert will purge the  Riverside  area
of all pollution in the late afternoon or early evening.   Such winds
often die down during the night so that, with a clear sky overhead,
a radiation inversion will form.   This will effectively  trap pollution
overnight and during the early morning traffic rush.   Samples taken
during this time have not been exposed to sunlight and can yield infor-
mation on the composition of genuine unreacted air pollution.  In  the
past 10 years, samples have been taken on perhaps  a score or more  of
such mornings.  The most striking observation is that typically  there
are no manifestations of pollution observable (haze,  eye irritation,
odor, etc.).   Yet chemical analysis shows high levels of many pollut-
ants.  Hydrocarbon distribution on such a morning  is  shown in Figure 13.
             ppb
           80--

           70--

           60--

           50--

           40--

           30--
              xlOO
           20--
           10--
    HYDROCARBONS IN UNREACTED
          MORNING   AIR
       (II SAMPLE AVERAGE)
       29 JAN '70 0735-0800 PST
    Ill  ••• . •••    I
                                                   .ll.l
               123  22334
            NATURAL
              GAS
CRACKED
PRODUCTS
4444 555
FUEL OLEFINS
4455666656
 FUEL SATURATES
                               FIGURE 13

-------
                                   26
     Several features of this chart are noteworthy:
     1)  Concentrations for the most part are as high or higher than
those  found even in heavy smog.  Acetylene, for example, was 78 ppb
compared to 27 ppb on August 6, 1970.  Since auto exhaust is by far
the largest source of acetylene, this indicates that auto exhaust was
present in high concentration even though there were no visible signs
of pollution.
     2)  Some very reactive hydrocarbons were present in readily
measurable amounts, such as 2.5 ppb of 2-methylbutene-2.  The amounts
of propene and ethene as compared to acetylene are much higher in this
unreacted sample.  This will be discussed in much detail later.
     3)  The amounts and distribution of the saturates are not much
different between morning and afternoon samples.
     It is tempting to suggest following the course of smog develop-
ment on such a day.  This cannot be done since the radiation inversion
is destroyed early in the morning before very much reaction has
occurred.   Very often little or no oxidant is formed on such days.
     The data shown in Figure  13   are averages of 11 samples taken
in pairs between 0735 and 0800.  Study of individual samples is also
informative because it shows that some pairs of individual hydrocarbons
fluctuate with each other while others do not.   This clearly reflects
the different sources of hydrocarbons.  Figure  14,   for example, shows
the fluctuation with time of methane and acetylene.   From the duplicate
analyses it can be seen that these fluctuations are much larger than
the analytical error.  Even at 0735 PST the acetylene was higher than
in smog samples of 24 October 1968 and 6 September 1968, which in turn
are much higher than in clean air.
     The independent time fluctuations suggested plotting acetylene
and ethene against methane (Figure   15  ).   Although there is some
tendency for higher values to go together the correlation is poor.
Much better correlations were found when ethene and propene were plotted
against acetylene (Figure  16 ) and when ethane and propane were plotted against
methane (Figure  17).   The good correlations shown by these two figures
reflect the fact that most of the ethene, propene and acetylene come
from one source (auto exhaust) while the methane, ethane and propane

-------
                           27
        e
120+2.4 8:
  100
•a
a
   80
5
w
z
u
w
u
    1.6 «
                METHANE AND ACETYLENE IN MORNING AIR
                (H-F Bldg. 29 Jan 70, 0730-0800)
 60-1.2
   40
   . >—24 Oct 68, 1610 PST

        CHHCH in SMOG

 20 -f    6 Sep68, 1500PST
           CH4 in CLEAN AIR
   0
   0730
          CHECH  in CLEAN AIR
                    0-740                0750
                      PACIFIC STANDARD TIME
0800
                                FIGURE 14

-------
         28
HYDROCARBONS IN MORNING AIR
(H-F Bldg 29 Jan 70, 0730-0800)
120 •


ex
°ioo .

•
w 80 •
w
0 60 •
Z
PJ

>
h 40 '
W
u
20 '
120
0°
0
o •


t

• • ^
ft
e
• t
o

0 *


• 1 *
0 1500 2000 250
        METHANE CH4> ppb


              FIGURE 15

-------
                    29
•a
ex
 CN
u
 CO
I
U
w"
z
p^
o
 CN

g
   100
I
u
   80
   60
   40
   20
    0
      0
          AUTO EXHAUST COMPONENTS IN MORNING AIR
           (H-F Bldg.  29 Jan 70, 0730-0800 PST)
                    CH2-CH2
                         50                 100
                ACETYLENE, CH2CH, ppb
                        FIGURE 16

-------
                                   30
   50
•a
a,

 . 40
 oo
X
CO
U

S 30 '
o
   20 -
 cs
U
   10
   0
     1200
NATURAL GAS IN MORNING AIR
(H-F Bldg. 29 Jan 70,  0730-0800 PST) /}  C2H6
                 1500                 2000
                         METHANE, CH4,  ppb
                                                                    51     4- 7
                                                          C3H8    23    2.1
                                                           CH4   1000   93.2
                                                           2500
                                                                 1074  100.0
                                FIGURE 17

-------
                                  31
come from another.  The fact that concentrations vary by a factor of
2-1/2 (saturates)  or 5 (unsaturates) indicates  that the sources are
all relatively local.  If these had been carried from a distant source
over a period  of hours a much more uniform mixture would be expected.
     The paraffins  (Figure  17  ) plots both can be extrapolated to
zero concentration at about 1350 ppb on the methane axis.  This agrees
with the value for  pure air already cited.   The proportions of ethane
and propane as cpmpared to the excess methane above this background
value can be derived from the slopes of the two plots.  The composi-
tion shown in  the  figure approximates that of natural gas (Figure 18 ).
     ppb
      60--

      50--

      40--

      30--
       20--
       10--
        0
            x
           100
            I
                NATURAL  GAS
                I06 dilution
            I  2 3
         NATURAL
          GAS
I  I  I  I  I
22334
CRACKED
PRODUCTS
4444  555
FUEL OLEFINS
4455666656
 FUEL SATURATES
                              FIGURE 18

-------
                                   32
                 TABLE 8.  Natural Gas in Ambient Air


Methane
(excess above
background)
Ethane
Propane
Natural
Gas
90


8.4
1.7

29 Jan 70
93.2%


4.7%
2.1%

Jan
91.6


7.1
1.4

63
91.3


6.8
1.9

Jan 68
91


6.5
2.6
     Compositions derived in this way on a number of different occasions
are compared in Table 8.  The agreement is close enough to be convincing,
although natural gas composition varies from week to week and a more
detailed study would take this into account.
     The plot of ethene and propene versus acetylene has been repeated
on a number of occasions.  The slopes of these lines can be used to
estimate the relative amounts of ethene and propene as compared to acetylene
in unreacted air.  These ratios are remarkably consistent as shown by the
computation made over the years in Table 9.  These ratios of 0.85 =
ethene/acetylene and 0.25 = propene/acetylene are close to the ratios of
0.91 and 0.34 reported by Neligan e_t al^. in 1961 (Figure 19) for auto
exhaus t.

TABLE 9.   Molar Ratio of Ethene (C2H.) to Acetylene (C^) and Propene
          (C-H,) to Acetylene in Various Samples of Unreacted Air
Ethene
Acetylene
Propene
Acetylene
Ethene
Acetylene
Propene
Acetylene
Jan 63
0.87 0.95
0.22 0.21
24 Oct 66
0.91 0.96
0.25 0.25
22 Dec 65(a)
0.43
0.11 0.16
Dec 67
0.72 0.72
0.21 0.21
3 Mar 66
0.73
0.21
Dec 67(b)
0.66
0.18
10 Mar 66
0.84 0.80
0.23 0.22

-------
                                 33
TABLE 9    (continued)
Ethene
Acetylene

Propene
Acetylene
             23 Jan  68

               0.81


               0.24
      29  Jan  70

        0.83


        0.21
  10 Feb 71

    0.73


    0.21
(a)  Very high  acetylene, two propene instruments

(b)  Monterey-Salinas area
ppb
60-t-
    50--
    40--
    30--
    20--

 B.G.-
    10-h
                              ppb
                                  1
                  AUTO EXHAUST
                  5000 dilution
                  Fuel #2  (8.2% Olefin)
                  Neligan  Japca  April '61

                       * Not measured
                                               I  I  I  I
                                   67888899999999
                                         FUEL  AROMATICS
                              Not separated
                                            I
                                                     /__(
                                                      MI
         I  2 3
      NATURAL
        GAS
             22334
             CRACKED
            PRODUCTS
4444555
FUEL OLEFINS
4455666656
 FUEL  SATURATES
                              FIGURE  19

-------
                                   34
In view of the uncertainties in the driving cycle, the values derived
from ambient air data are thought to be a truer estimate of the ratios
of these components in urban auto exhaust.   Figure  19  was plotted on
the same scale as the ambient air charts by applying a 5000 fold
dilution factor.  The 8.2% olefin fuel used to produce this exhaust,
when diluted by 10 million to one yieldsthe bar chart of Figure  20.
ppb
60-
50-
40-

30-
20-
10-
0-
ppb
20--
1
o •'
6788
GASOLINE
I07 dilution
Neligan JAPCA April '61
*Not measured
*
1 |
8899999999
FUEL AROMATICS


II 1 II II i • •
II 1 II II
23 22334 4444555 '
NATURAL CRACKED FUEL OLEFINS
GAS PRODUCTS


Not separated
ll.n...
4455666656
FUEL SATURATES
                                FIGURE 20
 This  illustrates  the  reason  for  classifying  these hydrocarbons as  fuel
 components  and  cracked  products.   For  completeness a partial blowby
 analysis  is shown in  Figure    21  .   It would obviously be very diffi-
 cult  to distinguish blowby hydrocarbons  from exhaust hydrocarbons.

-------
                                   35
   ppb
     60--

     50--

     40--

     30--
ppb
 20--

  10--
BLOW  BY  GAS
40,000  fold dilution
PATTISON  ond  STEPHENS
(24 cars)

* Not measured
      67888899999999
           FUEL   AROMATICS
0-
o-
i 1 1 • . ..ii. I


*
A
r ^
1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 III
123 22334 4444555 4455666656
NATURAL CRACKED FUEL OLEFINS FUEL SATURATES
GAS PRODUCTS
                              FIGURE 21
Other Sources
     Several other hydrocarbon sources  were studied as  possible  contribu-
tions to atmospheric hydrocarbon.   Figure 22    shows a sample taken in a
controlled experimental burn of mountain brush.   Three  things  are note-
worthy:  (1) The smoke contains very little saturated hydrocarbons of
four or more carbons; this is a striking contrast to auto emissions.
(2) Concentrations were not very high compared to car exhaust, even
though this sample was taken in dense smoke.   (3) Ethene was much larger
than acetylene again in sharp contrast  to auto exhaust.
     Figure  23  shows an analysis (at 10 fold  dilution)  of air from an
oil field.   This sample was taken just  adjacent  to oil  wells in  an
urban area.  The concentrations  of cracked products are attributed to
auto exhaust from nearby traffic  and the fuel saturates and natural

-------
    36
ppb
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
10-
0-















1
1
PP° - BRUSH FIRE SMOKE
20 " 10 FOLD DILUTION
(CONTROLLED BURN)
NORTH MOUNTAIN
10-- |2V 1969
0.1 	 i i i i i i i i i i i l
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
67888899999999
FUEL AROMATICS


• ill 	 _• 	
23 22334 4444555 4455666656
NATURAL CRACKED FUEL OLEFINS FUEL SATURATES
GAS PRODUCTS

ppb
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
10-




xlC


FIGURE 22
ppb
204- OIL FIEbO AIR

10 FOLD DILUTION
)0__ (SIGNAL HILL)
01 ._) 	 i i i i l l l i l i i
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
67888899999999
FUEL AROMATICS
X)


II. l i ill III I I • •
23 22334 4444555 4455666656
NATURAL CRACKED FUEL OLEFINS FUEL SATURATES
GAS PRODUCTS
FIGURE 23

-------
                                    37
gas components present  in unusually high concentration are attributed
to the oil wells.   These emissions may help explain the high levels of
paraffins in urban  air.   Some samples taken in an  industrial area are
shown in Figure  24  .   The most striking difference is the presence
of 30 ppb of 1,3-butadiene and a reversed order  of abundance of propene,
ethene and acetylene (as compared to auto exhaust).
           METHANE
           ETHANE
           PROPANE

           ACETYLENE
           ETHENE
           PROPENE
           METHYL ACETYLENE
           1,3-BUTADIENE

           1-BUTENE
           ISOBUTENE
           TRANS-2-BUTENE
           CIS-2-BUTENE
           2-METHYL  BUTENE-1
           CYCLO PENTENEfa;
           TRANS-2-PENTENE
           2-METHYL  BUTENE-2

           ISOBUTANE
           N-BUTANE
           ISOPENTANE  .
           N-PENTANE  ^
           CYCLO PENTANE
           2,2-DIMETHYL BUTANE
           2,3-DIMETHYL BUTANE
           2-METHYL  PENTANE (d)
           3-METHYL  PENTANE
           N-HEXANE
                                  Industrial Area  Parking Lot
                                    2 samples   4 samples
             Busy Comer
              4 samples
             2368  |50 ppb
                                      50 ppb
     50 ppb
50 ppb
           HYDROCARBON DISTRIBUTION
           NEAR SOURCES.
(a) 2-METHYL BUTADIENE-1,3
(W3-METHYL BUTENE-1
(c) 1-PENTENE
(d) CIS-2-PENTENE
       included
                                FIGURE 24

-------
                                   38
      In addition  to  the propane  the  four  and  five  carbon paraffins
are  found  in Riverside smog  in larger  concentrations  than are easily
accounted  for by  auto exhaust.   For  example,  in Figure  25   the
   ppb
    60--

    50--

    40--
    30--
    20--
  Bfi.-
    10--
                     HYDROCARBONS  IN  POLLUTED  AIR
       xlOO
                ppb
                 20+
                 10--
                       24 MARCH 1971
                       4:00-4:10 PM
                                      67868899999999
                                          FUEL AROMATICS
         I 2 3
      NATURAL
        GAS
22334
CRACKED
PRODUCTS
4444555
FUEL OLEFINS
4455666656
 FUEL SATURATES
                               FIGURE 25
n-butane concentration is approximately equal to the acetylene, whereas,
in auto exhaust, Figure   19  , it was three or  four times  smaller.
These excesses are ascribed to gasoline vaporized  from  fuel  tanks which
is known from emission inventories to be a substantial  source  of hydro-
carbons.  It might be expected that gasoline vaporization  would be
greater on very hot days and  there is in fact a striking correlation
between maximum oxidant and maximum temperature.   Data  for one month
each in the summers of 1967 and 1972 are shown  in  Figure   26.
It is difficult to see how this trend could be blamed directly on the

-------
                                  39
       o
       3
             0.60
             0.50
              «•
             0.30
             0.20i
             0.10
SMOG AND HEAT
     IN
   RIVERSIDE
  AUGUST 1967 O
   JULY  1972 +
                85
O
+
                                      4  °
                                         000
           O O •+• O    O    O
         *    o
                        90
                                 95
                                         100
                                                  105
                                                          110
                                  MAXIMUM TEMP °F
                               FIGURE  26
effect of temperature on the kinetics  of  the  reaction since most reactions
have small activation energies.   Several  explanations are possible, involving
interaction with meteorological variables.  For  example, high temperatures
decrease the relative humidity which will desiccate the aerosol and thereby
reduce the scattering of short wave ultraviolet  which is crucial for oxidant
formation.  Also, high temperatures occur when the mixing layer is shallow and
is capped by a very warm layer of air  aloft.   Such conditions could favor
prolonged irradiation which also  promotes oxidant formation.
     To see whether extreme temperatures  would be accompanied by excess
emissions of light paraffins samples were taken  when the temperature was
106°F (see Figures 27 and 28).  Six samples were taken simultaneously at
each of two locations:  1) the roof of the  sixth floor, Health-Finance
Building, in central Riverside, and 2)  a  small hill about four miles east
of this and just behind the UCR campus.   The  UCR air monitoring station

-------
                                 39a
recorded 0.30-0.33 ppm oxidant at this time,  so there was moderate smog.
Individual samples of each group were nearly  the same in distribution,  but
the central Riverside samples were uniformly  higher than the hill samples
in all components as though dilution were the only difference between the
two sites.  Both showed the depletion of the  olefins, indicating a sub-
stantial degree of reaction.

-------
                              40
              HYDROCARBONS  IN  POLLUTED  AIR
                21 AUG. 1969, 1440 PST - I06°F (HILL)
 ppb
  30+
  20-1-
B.6.-
_
10-
xJO
•
-d—
N/
o



23 22334
tfURAL CRACKED
GAS PRODUCTS
                            4  444555
                            FUEL OLEFINS
1

v\ _, . R •.
• n
 4455666656
    FUEL SATURATES
                           FIGURE 27
                   HYDROCARBONS IN  POLLUTED AIR
                    21 AUG.  1969, 1440 PST - I06°F  (ROOF)
ppb
30-





20-



B.G. —
10-

f\








xOO


_



°











•





















M n _
23 22334
NATURAL CRACKED
GAS PRODUCTS
                            4 444555
                             FUEL OLEFINS








n
i
t
1
i
1


















•










„ Jfl m0
445 56666 56
  FUEL SATURATES
                            FIGURE 28

-------
                                   41
If compared with the auto exhaust analysis of Figure  19   , a dilution
of 25,000 is indicated for the hill samples.  But the result of this
experiment was negative; no dramatic increase in C.-C  paraffins as
compared to the cracked products was seen (even at 106°F).

Gasoline Vaporization
     Nevertheless, these light paraffins are consistently higher in
afternoon samples than in morning samples as illustrated in Figure 29.
Since these paraffins along with benzene and toluene react to only a
                   COMPARISON OF HYDROCARBON DISTRIBUTIONS
                           -100 0    +300-100  0    + 300-100  0      +300
_^^^_*
mwwwiwm

[_
Acetylene
Ethylene
Propylene
1 1 butene
1

L
-3

Isobutene
Ethane
Propane
Isobutane
n. butane
1 1 Isopentane
[In. pentane

[

M*






f
T_
t
i

t

m
\m
^^^nmnffifff
\
\
T U
f r
1
1 1




ib
n
1
1
1
Average of four 11-4-65 4:40 PST 9-24-65 2P.M. 10-7-65 2:20 P.M.
morning samples
Afternoon samples - % deviation from morning average
                               FIGURE 29
small degree (see later sections), it was possible to make an estimate
of the contribution of gasoline vaporization to total hydrocarbon by
fitting atmospheric data to Raoult's law for gasoline.  Raoult's law

-------
                                   42
was shown to be reasonably accurate when applied to gasoline to calcu-
                             4
late the true vapor pressure.  To apply this to ambient air data, the
concentration of the ith hydrocarbon C. is approximated by an estimated
sum of contributions of liquid and vapor
                        C. = C..   + C
                         i    liq    vap

This can be most easily visualized by imagining that a sample of liquid
gasoline (L nanomoles) and a sample of saturated vapor-air mixture from
above this gasoline (V nanomoles) has been added to each mole of air.
Then the following two equations apply:
                        CL .   = x.L
                         liq    i
                        C    = p.V = x.P. V
                         vap    i     i 10

where x. = mole fraction of hydrocarbon i in the gasoline
      p. = vapor pressure (atm) of hydrocarbon i over the gasoline
           (assume saturation)
     P.  = vapor pressure (atm) of pure hydrocarbon i
                                                        /*.
     This hypothetical mixture then has a concentration C. of hydrocarbon i

                        C. = x.L + x.P. V
                         11     i 10

To fit this to an ambient air analysis these values are subtracted from
the observed concentration C.

                        C. - £. = C. - (x.L + x.P. V)
                         i    i    i     i     110

To obtain a fit, L and V are adjusted to minimize £(C.  - C.)  which is,
of course, a least squares procedure.   With more than 3 or 4 hydrocarbons
this becomes a very tedius calculation best suited to the computer.  A
program for this was written in APL forthe UCR IBM 360/50 as shown in
the following pages.   The first trials showed that the temperature

-------
    V
[1]   'ENTER DATA SET NBR'
[2]   NSET+fl
[3]   'ENTER CODE NBRS FOR HYDROCARBONS'
[4]   flZTKl
[5]   •EMPffi? CO/PCS (PPB), Z/SF, ZF-flO IF C0//C IS NOT GIVEN'
[6]   £A*-0*CTtf«-Q
[7]   'EW2E7? M9LF, FRACTIONS'
[8]   JCmW]
[9]   •HWE'ff K4POT PRESSURES (ATM)'
[10]  PI^-D
[11]  'EWTEff DATE FOR CONCS - APPROX 8 LETTERS'
[12]  ZMTEM!]
[13]  'ENTER SOURCE FOR MOLE FRACTIONS'
[14]  SOURCE^
[15]  'fftfTH? TffMP FOR VAPOR PRESSURES (DEC F)1
[16]  2M3
[17]  '15 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR REGRESSION DESIRED?'
[18]  ANS*ft
[19]  Y+'YES'
[20]  ;OWZ?«-OpO
[21]  XX++/XXX+U/XIN
[22]  CX++/X*C+U/CIN
[23]
[25]  NND<-(~U)/NIN
[26]  XND+-(~U)/XIN
[27]  PND*-(~U)/PIN
[28]  OT-«-(^0)
[29]  XXPP-M-/* x/xpxp
[30]  DETER+-*(XXxXXPP)-XXP*XXP<-+/XxXxP
[31]  ZP*-Jrxp
[32]  XL<-XxL<-DETERx(CXxXXPP)-CPXxXXP
[33]  DEVX+UX/DEV+C-LV+XL+XPV+XPx V+DETERx (XXxCPX ) -XXPxCX
[34] PRINT: 'DATA SET= ' ',NSET;lQp'  ';'NBR HYDROCARBONS IN CALC-' ;pW;'    ffflff HYDROCARBONS IN SET=' ;pNIN
[35]  25p'  ';'(7(PPB)   X(W)    P(^W)  AT P(xl2'W)  AT L    ^P7^L+^Pl^
[36]  25p'  ';• I        I       10      I 10      I      I 10    I   I 10'
[37]  20p'  ^JMIff;1   '-.SOURCE;'    *\T\'*F   ' ;2"; ' "F1 ;36p '    (PPB)'
[38]  '  •
[39]  I<-0
[40]

-------
[41]  J+-I-H
[42]  ffCJftUfffClttl];];  9 3 DFT PRNT+Cin ,7[I],P[I],XP[r] ,*£[!],XPf[I],
[43]  -ȣWZWC
[44] NODATA:-»•(Q=0NND)/SUM
[45]  I«-0
[46]  XLNEK-XNDxL
[47]  LVND<-XLND+XPVN[h-VxXPND*-XNDxPflD
[48]
[49]
[50]  ffCff>l/^[M£)[J];];9p' '; 9 3
[51]  -^Sro//Z?
[52] SUM:SC++/C
[53]  SP++/PIN
[54]  SXL+LXSX+-+/XIN
[55]  SLV+SXL+SXPV*-V*SXP<-(+/XP)++/XPND<-XPND, 0
[56]  >!W?ff7*-(*pI7ff^)x5Z?ffVr*-l-/(|Z?ffra)
[57]  •  •
[58]  16p'  ';'Si/W ';  9 3 DF7 PRNT*-SC,SXtSP,SXP,SXLtSXPVtSLV.SDEV
[59]  79p'  ';MVF';  10 3 DFT AVDEV
[60]  •  '
[61]  30p»  •;IL=';L;1    7=';7;'
[62]  '  •
[63]  -+(Y*ANS)/0
[64]  •     ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE*
[65] 4M4L:MSREG*-SSPEG+-+/LV*LV
[66]  ND*-(pN)-2
[67]  F+-MSREG*MSDEV*-( *ND )
[68]  15p'  ^'OF^Sp1 ';'
[69]  'REGRESSION     1'; 13 3 ZVT PRNT+SSREG,MSREGtF
[70]  'DEVIATION       ';M>; 13 3 DFT  PRNT+SSDEV\MSDEV
[71]  -K)

-------
                                   45
assumed to obtain P.  values was not crucial to the estimate of vapor
contribution.  This is because all components increase in vapor pres-
sure by a similar factor between, for example 70  and 100 F.  For this
reason 100 F was used in later trials.   The most important and difficult
to obtain piece of data is the gasoline composition.  The first attempts
were made to use a morning hydrocarbon analysis as a fuel composition,
and assuming no vaporized gasoline, but these were not too successful.
Later an  analysis of Los Angeles basin gasoline was made available by
the Western Oil and Gas Association.  Use of this fuel composition was
discontinued when it was realized that its calculated vapor pressure
would be only about 7.5 or 8.0 psia.  The four and five carbon paraffins
are obviously the crucial factor in both the calculation and in deter-
mining the fuel vapor pressure.  The composition was, therefore, adjusted
to give a true vapor pressure by calculation of 0.700 atmospheres at
100°F or 10.3 psia.  This is probably just a little high, but it was
used to estimate liquid and vapor contributions for a number of samples.
A sample computer print-out is shown in Figure  30   .  The first column
gives the analysis obtained on 6 Aug 1970.  The second column gives the
fuel composition (mole fraction, labelled 7/10/72 because it was first
adopted on that date).  This fuel and its vapor are compared in
Figures 31  & 32.  The third column gives the vapor pressures of the pure
hydrocarbons and the fourth gives the contribution of each hydrocarbon
to total vapor pressure.  The sum of this column gives the calculated
true vapor pressure of the fuel which should be about 0.5 psia above
the RVP.  The requirement that this be a realistic value is the most
crucial element in the calculation.  It fixes the C.-C,. content of the
fuel; changes in the higher molecular weight range will have a minor
effect on the vapor pressure and on the final result.  Column five
gives the concentrations of individual hydrocarbons ascribed to liquid
fuel and column six gives that ascribed to vaporized fuel.  The totals
include all those hydrocarbons presumed present in the fuel and in the
atmosphere, including those not measured.  They do not include the
cracked products.  Column seven gives the total of column five and six
and column eight gives the deviation of column seven, the "best fit"
concentrations, and column one, the measured concentrations.  The fit

-------
                                46
                                        46
DATA S2T=47
11BR RIDROCAWOSS 7.V
                                               FIGURE 30
                                              UBS H?DnocAZBc;is in SET-HI





J
j
1
i
j
J
j -• —
<
1
i



\
i
j
1
i



SSf
•ilfciF
£T.^£V/£'£'
p-VIi^l1' ""''"
p-cf.V/i TOLUEHE
!-!-S?S?L TQLUEIT5 "
ISOaUT&'it; .. .
CIS-2-3UTB:iF.
— t^rSITfi, BUTEliS-i
2-/€T.71'L 3UTEIIE-2
ISOPROPZL BEllZEilE
ti-PROP'fL BEllZS'lS
— O^ST'^fL TO LUSH S
135 TPJMETE2L 3SHZEI!
124 TPJMETttfL BSHZZX
—•123 T?.It'!SntXIi BEl.'ZSti
C2CLO HEZTAflSS
CICLO OCZA11ES
CiCL,U U'jllAliSo
HSPTSJES
C'jfCLO HEXEuES
CYCLO HSPTS11E3
11 CAX30H AROl'lATICS
12 C.t330(V A301-1ATICS

8/5/70
13.800
33.400
25: 200
14.400
C . 800
5.300
3.400
6. £00
8. '700
3 . JOO
1.500
2.500
i. I ;>;
1.200
0.600
' 17300"









142.800
I
7/10/72
0.020
0.071
O.OOj
0.055
0.005
w . 012
0.040
0.027
o . on -
0.023
0.020
0.018
0.018
0.013
0.010
OV01S '
0.001
0.-001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.008
0.010
0.010
0. 010
0.010
0.015
G . GIG
0.120
0.100
0.013
0.003
U.UUJ
0.030
0.003
u.Gu«:
0.003
0.007
0.012
0.010
1.001
— ?O1r..
10
100°F
4.920
3.510
1 . 390
1.050
0.573
0.497
0.4S3
0.415
0.340
0.257
G. G i G
0.025
0.023
0.01S
0.014
' Q-.G14
12.630
4.300
4.320
3.500
3.130
1.050
0.980
0.014
C.014
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.100
t!r20"<7
0.120
0.070
u.uau
0.410
C.130
0.210
0.100
C.010
0.010
0.010
^•8??
£=107. 2882853
M1
JiWJi^^.V lo
JS
2351.920
2351.
90.14U 3
s
920
. 634
) — r-?r^..
I 10
100»f
0.098
0.249
0. 133
0.059
0.003-
0 . GGo
0.013
0.011
O.C10
0.005
J . C G 4-
0.000
0:000
~'J . v*^ -~"
0.000
0.000
0.000
'0.010
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.003
O.OOB
0.003
0.000
0.000
o.occ
0.000
0.002
0.010
U . u <- I;
0.002
0.000
U.UU'J
0.012
o.coo
0.001
0.001
0.000
o.coo
0.000
0.700
\Q *
") — Tt 	
I
(FPB)
2.146
7.617
6.003'
0.526
1. 237
4.292
2.937
3.111
2.146
5.354
1.931
1.931
1.931
1.073
t. 60?
0.086
0.107
0.107
0.107
0.107
0.358
0.853
1.073
1.073
1.073
1.609
1. G73
12.875
10.729
1.395
0.322
j.322
3.219
0.322
0.322
0.751
l.oGa
1.287
1.073
107.374
A* C AijTAt" / ^~i i
I 10 I I 10
(??3) (P?3) (??3)
12.371
31.332
x T ,301
7.453
0.423
2.328
1.409
1.240
0.571
0 . -+40
0.057
0.052
0.041
0.018
0.'C25'
1.270
0.541
0. 543
0 . 440
0.394
1. 287
1.056
0.98S
0.018
0.018
0. 013
0.018
C.026
.j.Gld
0.211
1.257
C. 754
0.196
0.025
O.uls
1.546
0.049
0.079
0.088
0.01:)
0.015
0.013
87.965
»«• S J — U.V
7=125.7239706 7*S£/AO( .Z">P(
F
506.219





14.517
33.949
13.471
C.350
2 . v j /
5.520
".305
X . - 1 J
4. 351
2.317
5. iiC4
1.953
1.9d3
1.972
1.090
1.63S
1.355
0.648
0.650
0.547
0.501
1.914
1.S44
1.090
1.090
1 . 090
1.090
1.636
1. 030
13.086
11.986
3 . 9 / 3
1.591
0.348
'J. 341
4.765
0.371
0.401
0.839
1.62-3
1.303
1.085
195.339
AV3
10)] =87.


4.283
"C.549
1 - 323
"-.;.: 3 o
• c . 4 i? —
"0.520
0.906
C . 5 1 '?
C.249
5.833
"0.498
_0.517
"0.772
"0.^90
' ~0.335" '









28.217
1.558
96503907

..
                             FIGURE 30
                   Vapor/Liquid  Computation

-------
                            47
ppb
60--.


50--


40--


30--


20--


 10--
            ppb
            20-4-
             10 +
             0
                          GASOLINE  VAPOR
                          0.7 otm.  at 100° F
                          42.5 ppb total
                                -H-
                             -K-
                  78888999999999
                    FUEL  AROMATICS
     I  2 3
  NATURAL
    GAS
             -f-H-
2233
CRACKED
PRODUCTS
4444555
FUEL OLEFINS
                         445566665678N
                            FUEL  SATURATES
                         FIGURE 31
 ppb
 60--


 50--


 40--


 30--


 20--


 10--
            ppb
             20--

             10--
                       VAPORI2ED  GASOLINE
                       0.7 atm. at IOO°F
                       189 ppb total
                 • I..I,
                                      .,1
                 67888899999999 10-12
                      FUEL  AROMATICS
                                 JlJ
                                                          I
      I 2 3
   NATURAL
     GAS
22334
CRACKED
PRODUCTS
          4444 5556-8
            FUEL OLEFINS
                445566665678N
                    FUEL  SATURATES
                          FIGURE 32

-------
                                   48
in this example is reasonably good; benzene is the poorest fit which
may be due to formation of benzene in engines as a cracking product.
It is not surprising that vapor accounts for most of the butanes and
over half of the pentanes.  In contrast, it accounts for only about
2-3% of the xylenes.  In comparing the totals derived from liquid and
from vapor, it must be remembered that this treatment is "by moles"
whereas emission inventories are expressed by weight.  If we take the
fuel molecular weight to be 100 and the vapor to be 60, then the vapor
contribution in the case illustrated is just half the liquid fuel
contribution.  To this liquid contribution must be added the cracked
products found in exhaust gas.  This would make the vapor contribution
about 30-40% of the exhaust contribution which agrees with the gener-
ally accepted emission estimates.  Some results obtained on other
samples are given in Table 10.
TABLE
Sample Date
6 Aug 70, afternoon
24 Mar 71, afternoon
21 Aug 69, roof, afternoon
21 Aug 69, hill, afternoon
10 Feb 71, morning
10. Hydrocarbons
Oxidant
(ppm)
0.65
-
0.30-0.33
0.30-0.33
-
Liquid
(ppb)
107
93
84
34
189
Vapor
(ppb)
88
51
48
28
43
V/L
0.82
0.55
0.57
0.82
0.23
Hydrocarbons in Other Locations
     Since one liter of sample or less suffices to make an analysis for
two dozen hydrocarbons, it was possible to analyze samples from a number
of locations around the country and around the world.   Except for loca-
tions in California, samples were taken by willing cooperators to whom
bottles were shipped by common carrier.  Aside from southern California,
the following locations have been sampled:

-------
         Bay Area                   Honolulu
         San Joaquin Valley         Tokyo, Japan
         Point Arena                McMurdo Sound (Antarctica)
         Salinas Valley             New York
         Denver

     Two of these locations, Point Arena and McMurdo, were chosen to
estimate the background levels of hydrocarbons, methane in particular.
The values found were near or perhaps a little lower than the 1.39
ppm found in the southern California mountains.  The levels of ethane,
ethene and acetylene were also similar.  Several of these groups of
samples have been described in previous papers so that discussion
will not be repeated here.   Generally speaking, all these other areas
showed hydrocarbon levels and distributions similar to those found
in southern California.  There was considerably more variation from
sample to sample than in southern California.   The reasons for this
are not known.  In spite of it the general impression was that of
auto emissions rather than any of the other sources described earlier.
Tokyo and Honolulu were of special interest because they have little
or no natural gas, although importation of LNG is beginning.   As
expected, methane values were low (near the background value) and the
amounts found might be ascribed to other sources (auto exhaust, fuel
combustion).  Honolulu probably has poor atmospheric ventilation
only on rare occasions.  Since our samples were taken on one day only,
not necessarily a stagnant air day, this does not constitute a good
test of the prediction that the lack of natural gas should lead to
methane values near the worldwide background.
     Tokyo is of special interest for two additional reasons.  It has
a very rapidly expanding automobile population (tripled in ten years)
and the characteristic symptoms of photochemical smog are increasingly
noticeable (oxidants over 0.3 ppm).   In addition it has an unusual
population of LPG powered vehicles (especially taxicabs).   Since
propane and propene are major components of LPG exhaust, special attention
was paid to these two components in Tokyo air.  They were not found in
exceptional amounts in Tokyo air.  While the proportion of taxis in

-------
                                   50
Tokyo which run on LPG is unusually high, they nevertheles.s do not form
a large part of the total vehic-le population.  The Japanese are now
using GLC atmospheric, hydrocarbon .analysis to study their problem.
     The New York samples were taken in Manhattan^ near heavy traffic
areas.  Concentrations were quite high but remarkably similar to
Riverside in distribution.  The Denver samples were also more variable
than the southern California experience.

-------
                                    51
HYDROCARBON REACTIVITY
     Since the very beginning  of  research  on  photochemical air pollution,
it has been evident that  the reactivities  of  individual hydrocarbons
are strongly dependent on their structure.  This  is  true whether
reactivity is judged by chemical  criteria  such  as ozone formation,
oxidation of nitric oxide, or  hydrocarbon  disappearance, or by symp-
toms such as eye irritation, plant damage,  or aerosol  formation.
The correlation between these  measures  of  reactivity is neither strict
nor quantitative but there is  a tendency for  them to go together.   After
some investigation, a rather clear pattern of chemical reactivity
began to emerge.  Compounds which contain  double  bonds are much more
reactive than those which do not.  This was apparent first for the
olefins and later for the aromatics,  some  of  which proved to be more
reactive than olefins of  the lowest reactivity.   From  the nature of
the products, it could be inferred that rupture of the double bond
occurs in both cases, at  least for olefins  and  polyalkyl aromatics.
Benzilic hydrocarbons form a special  case  (see  later).   A further
parallel appeared in that addition of alkyl groups adjacent to either
olefinic or aromatic double bonds increases the reactivity.   The
number of such alkyl groups is more important than their size.   Tetra-
methyl ethylene is the most reactive  compound known  and mesitylene
(1,3,5 trimethyl benzene) is comparable in reactivity  to the less
reactive olefins.  The paraffins, not having  double  bonds, react more
slowly, although lengthening the  chain does increase reactivity,
perhaps simply by increasing the  number of potential sites for attack.
Napthenes, in very limited studies, appear  to behave like paraffins.
Acetylene is of very low  reactivity.  These relationships are summarized
in Figure  33.
                           HHOTOKEACTIVITY OF HYDHOCAUBONS
                               INCHKASINf. RKACT1VITY
                       OLEFINS     CH2 . CH2 ."dd """I
                                        rou.
                                             c
                                     c c
                                     I I
                       PARAFFINS CH4—^C-C-C-C
                       ACETYLENE  CH=CH
                          1
                                FIGURE 33

-------
                                   52
     Throughout this discussion, the term reactivity is used in its
chemical sense; that is, the rate at which the hydrocarbon disappears
under simulated atmospheric conditions (diluted along with nitrogen
oxides to ppm concentrations in air and irradiated with artificial
sunlight).  The term reactivity has also been used to mean either the
rate at which nitric oxide is converted to nitrogen dioxide under
these conditions or the amount of ozone produced.   Of course, the
 formation  of objectionable products (eye irritants, plant toxicants,
etc.) is the matter of real concern rather than just the disappearance
of the hydrocarbon.  However, there must be a relation between the
two; certainly hydrocarbon which does not react cannot form noxious
products.  Schemes have been devised for rating hydrocarbons according
to their tendency to produce such products.  Such a rating is some-
times referred to as "hydrocarbon reactivity" but it would be preferable
to reserve this term for its chemical sense and to use a term such as
"smog potential" for ratings based on the formation of objectionable
products.  For the most part those compounds which are of high chemical
                                                         Q
reactivity are those which also produce noxious products.   There are,
however, recognized differences in the ability of hydrocarbons of
various structure to produce the various symptoms.
     So far as is known hydrocarbons of all types are capable of causing
the photochemical conversion of nitric oxide to nitrogen dioxide, albeit
                        9
at vastly varying rates.   This reaction is closely related to the
formation of ozone, a toxicant of major concern.   Compounds which contain
double bonds also produce peroxyacyl nitrates, a family of plant toxicants
and eye irritants.   Saturated hydrocarbons produce little, if any, PAN.
Likewise, the enhancement of aerosol formation in systems containing
sulfur dioxide has been demonstrated for olefins but not for paraffins.
Subjective measurements of eye irritation also show that saturated com-
pounds produce less than unsaturated compounds.
     Evaluation of the relative importance of various classes of hydro-
carbons in producing photochemical air pollution encounters a further
obstacle.  Some knowledge of the extent to which various hydrocarbons
react under realistic ambient conditions is needed.   If very long times
are available for reaction, then hydrocarbons of low reactivity may make

-------
                                   53
a substantial contribution.  This is a serious question because the
hydrocarbons of low reactivity constitute a large part of the total
emissions  (paraffins, napthenes, benzene and acetylene).  Such
emissions  can only be retained in the lower atmosphere long enough
for reaction to occur if there is a temperature inversion.  Under
such conditions the cooler air at ground level cannot mix with the
warmer air aloft.   Such inversions, although they persist long enough
to permit photochemical reactions to occur, are vulnerable to the
normal heating of the lower atmosphere which results from contact
with the warm surface of the earth.  There has been no way to estimate
the lifetime of such a parcel of stable air, and this determines the
effective time available for reaction.  The fact that hydrocarbons do
vary in reactivity raises the possibility that analysis of polluted
atmospheres could provide an answer.
     Acetylene, ethene and propene are a unique trio of compounds for
judging the extent to which reaction has taken place in an ambient air
sample.  These three compounds are not present in gasoline but are
formed in auto engines and emitted in exhaust gas in substantial
quantities.  Moreover, they differ significantly in reactivity so that
they disappear at different rates under irradiation.  The relative
amounts of these three hydrocarbons in exhaust gases vary from car to
car and are dependent on engine operation as well.   But the ratios of
the total rates of emission of the three from all the cars in an
urban area are probably nearly independent of time, place and circum-
stance.  Evaluation of unreacted samples has lead (see prior sections)
to the values of 0.85 for the ethene/acetylene ratio and 0.25 for the
propene/acetylene ratio in unreacted emissions (molar basis).   To study
the effect of photoreaction, we have expressed each of these three
hydrocarbons as a percent of the total of the three.  Thus ethene
comprises 0.85/(1 + 0.85 + 0.25)  = 40.5% and propene 0.25/(1 + 0.85 +
0.25) = 11.9% of the total.  Expressed in this way the effect of reac-
tion can be studied independently of dilution.
     In previous sections evidence was presented that under specially
chosen conditions  ambient air contains quite high concentrations of
unreacted auto exhaust (dilutions of 2000 or so).   Table   9   showed

-------
                                   54
that the relative amounts  of acetylene,  ethene and propene were quite
consistent in unreacted air.   The  remarkable  and  revealing fact about
these samples is that symptoms of  air pollution are  completely absent.
On one occasion, the evening paper reported "this morning Riversiders
awoke to a cloudless sky,  and air  unmarred by smog,  and as a  result
the mountains stood sharply etched  against the horizon."
Ambient Air Irradiation
     In spite of this, analysis shows that high concentrations  of auto
exhaust and natural gas hydrocarbons are present under these conditions.
It would seem that monitoring of the air on such a day would provide a
particularly simple and useful way to study development of photochemical
smog.  This is not possible because the radiation inversion which
provides this trapping is destroyed by solar heating before the
photochemical reaction can proceed very far.  In order to study hydro-
carbon disappearance under irradiation, it is necessary to trap a sample
and  then irradiate it, either with artificial or natural sunlight.  The
results of such an experiment are shown in Figure  34 .  Initial concen-
trations were substantially higher than found in smog; even of those

                    HYDROCARBONS   IN  MORNING  AIR
ppb
60-
50-
40-
30-

20-
3.
10-
0-






xlOO











Pf i 10 FEB. 1971
20" 7:45 -8=00 AM
IOT m






II
i Q i i a 0
" 67888899999999
FUEL AROMATICS

	 AFTER 4 HOURS UV

|
i I
lei si* n 0 a 1
(



O.ll J
23 22334 4444555 4455666656
NATURAL CRACKED FUEL OLEFINS FUEL SATURATES
GAS PRODUCTS
                                FIGURE 34

-------
                                  55
hydrocarbons of very low reactivity such as acetylene and the paraf-
fins.  The presence of substantial amounts (3-5 ppb!) of some highly
reactive compounds (four and five carbon olefins and diolefins) shows
that this sample was largely unreacted.  The amounts which disappeared
in four hours of ultraviolet were quite consistent with reactivities
                                                               q
determined in the laboratory studies (see for example, Tuesday.
               In four hours about 37% of the ethylene reacted.
Although the olefins are most reactive and paraffins least reactive,
the quantities present reverse this order.  Thus, quantity and reacti-
vity, when multiplied together, become roughly constant.  The aromatics
are intermediate in both quantity and reactivity.  This indicates that
very little can be gained by focusing attention on any one group of
hydrocarbons.  It is also evident that the cracked hydrocarbons (those
present in exhaust but not in gasoline) contribute substantially to
total reacted hydrocarbons.   It should always be kept in mind that
substantial additional hydrocarbon in the higher molecular weight
range is present but not measured.  Presumably, these would follow
the reactivity pattern of these respective classes and not change the
overall conclusion.
     With two 20-liter borosilicate carboys, it was possible to take
a pair of ambient air samples simultaneously so that one could be
irradiated in artificial sunlight and one in natural sunlight.  This
was done with a pair of samples taken on October 24, 1966 between
0630 and 0650 PST.   These were taken on the roof of a five-story
building in central Riverside.   This is near downtown traffic but far
enough removed to permit mixing.   The two samples were nearly identical
in composition:  one was irradiated in natural sunlight beginning
about 0730 PST and the other in artificial ultraviolet the next day.
The sky was clear during the entire period of irradiation with natural
sunlight.
     A portion of the results of photolysis by natural sunlight of one
of these samples is shown in Figure  35    , and the comparison sample
photolyzed with ultraviolet  in Figure  36    •   There are several
notable features in these plots:   the natural sunlight sample showed
more reaction than the artificial but the relative reactivities were

-------
                                                   56
          NATURAL SUNLIGHT IRRADIATION
             OF AMBIENT AIR 10-24-'66
                                 • C=C
                                    C-C-C-C-C
0.1
                               FIGURE 35
1401
120.
100-
 80-
 90'
 40-
 20-
      SUNLIGHT IRRADIATION OF AMBIENT AIR
       HYDROCARBONS REACTED 10-24-'66
        11 Paraffins
        1201efuinC2-C5
                                6  hrs
                         hrs
                                          8  hrs
            2  hrs
 0<
          10      20             40
               Paraffins reacted, ppb

               FIGURE  37
so
                         ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION
                         OF AMBIENT AIR 10-24 -'88
                                                       100
                                                                                           C-C-C-C-C
                                                       0.1
                                                                 246
                                                                     Hours irradiation
                                           FIGURE  36
                                                               ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION
                                                                   OF AUTO EXHAUST
                100
                                                 .C-C-C-C


                                                 .• C-C-C-C-C-C
                                                 '" C-C-C-C
                                                                                          C-C-C-C
                                                       0.1
2       4       6
   Hours irradiation

  FIGURE  38

-------
                                   57
very similar.  The natural sunlight plots have a maximum slope near
noon which reflects the maximum intensity of sunlight.   The artificial
irradiation lines are nearly straight on these plots of log concen-
tration versus time.  This rather surprising result indicates that the
reagents which are attacking the hydrocarbon are substantially constant
throughout the irradiation.  The attack on the hydrocarbon can be
written:
where R. is a reagent (e.g. 0, 0~, OH, NO-) which attacks hydrocarbon
with a rate constant k..  This can be rearranged and integrated to
give log CQ/Cf = 0.434 Ik±  ^dt.
                            o
     The linearity of the log versus time plot indicates that the last
term is linear with time and therefore that either all R.'s are constant
                                                        i
or that somehow the changes in the R.'s counteract each other.  Previous
irradiations did show a slowing down of the rate after prolonged
irradiation (24 hours).    Before these ambient air experiments were done
it seemed possible that the reaction would slow down or even stop after
a few hours of irradiation because of consumption of photoinitiators.
From these two irradiations relative rates of reaction of various hydro-
carbons were derived by calculating log-pC /C,. with the results shown
in Table 11. For the olefins these relative reactivities are in reasonable
agreement with values determined in synthetic mixtures at concentrations
                                                                       Q
two or three orders of magnitude higher and reported several years ago.
The equipment and procedure used at that time did not permit evaluation
of the rates of the less reactive hydrocarbons.

-------
                                    58
                                 Table  11
    Relative Rates of Disappearance of Hydrocarbons Under  Irradiation
Ethene
Propane
i-Bucene
i-Butene
tr-2-pentene
n-butane
n-hexane
                    Blacklight
log C0/Cf
  0.217
  0.818
  0.823
  0.665
  4.2
  0.095
  0.132
Ratio'
 1.00
 3.8
 3.8
 3.1
19
 0.44
 0.61
     Sunlight
log C0/Cf    Ratio3
   0.345      1.00
   1.45       4.2
   0.79       2.4
   0.895      2.6
   0.090
   0.167
0.26
0.48
         Ref  (8.)

          0.83
          3.8


          5.2
         (22-18)1
   a Ethene = 1.00
           2-butene and 3-hexene
      The relative contributions of olefins and paraffins were expressed
 in another way by summing the amounts reacted after each time period
 with the result shown in Figure 37 which was derived from the same experi-
 ment as Figure 35.  This plot is curved because the olefins react more
 rapidly and so are depleted earlier in the experiment.   After eight
 hours about 130 ppb of olefin (mostly accounted for by propene and
 ethene) and 46 ppb of paraffin had reacted.  Inclusion of higher
 molecular weight hydrocarbons would change this picture somewhat,
 principally by inclusion of the moderately reactive aromatics.  According
 to air monitoring data the original mixture contained 0.14 ppm (140
 ppb) of nitric oxide which would, according to present understanding
 of the photochemical reaction, be converted to nitrogen dioxide in the
 first stages of the reaction.  Laboratory studies suggest that oxidation
 of one molecule of hydrocarbon is capable of converting about two
 molecules of nitric oxide.   Then about 70 ppb of hydrocarbon would be

-------
                                    59
required for conversion of the nitric oxide initially present.  If
we estimate that the total hydrocarbons reacting are twice the amount
measured this might require about two hours of irradiation.

Auto Exhaust Irradiation
     A sample of auto exhaust diluted with purified air was irradiated
with ultraviolet to generate the data shown in Figure38.  This sample
was obtained with the cooperation of Scott Research Laboratories.   A
1963 V-8 Chevrolet using "basin mix" gasoline and running on a chassis
dynamometer in the California standard driving cycle was used as a
source of exhaust.  Exhaust from a single cycle was collected in a
plastic bag after thorough warm-up of the engine.  A 20 ml portion of
exhaust gas was transferred to the 20 L  bottle which had previously
been flushed with purified air (also obtained from Scott Research
Laboratories).  This 1000-fold dilution produced a mixture which,
except for propane and other light paraffins, closely resembled that
obtained from ambient air.  The contents of the bag were also analyzed
by the nondispersive infrared instruments used for exhaust testing.
This showed 305 ppm of hydrocarbon (as n-hexane) , 3.57o carbon monoxide,
and 8.27o carbon dioxide.  This hydrocarbon concentration is below
average but not enough to be considered atypical.  The rates of disap-
pearance of the individual hydrocarbons in this experiment were
approximately the same as in the ambient air experiment.  The reason
for the curvature of some of the plots is not knowne

Extent of Reaction
     This type of irradiation data can be compared to ambient air
analyses to judge the extent to which reaction has occurred.   This is
important because it bears directly on the value of various control
strategies which call specifically for a reduction of the most reactive
hydrocarbons.   From laboratory studies of auto exhaust irradiation, it
was not possible to tell whether most of the reaction was due to the
high reactivity compounds (higher molecular weight olefins) or whether
actual ambient air conditions were such that hydrocarbons of medium

-------
                                    60
and low reactivity could participate.  This is related to the time
available for reaction; or the effective residence time of pollutants
in the atmosphere.  Acetylene, ethene and propene forma  unique set
of compounds for judging the extent of reaction since they are almost
exclusively derived from auto exhaust; they are emitted in known ratios
to each other (see Table   9    ), and they differ quite widely in
reactivity.   Dilution will reduce all three concentrations in propor-
tion, but photochemical reaction will destroy the propene most rapidly,
the ethene at a moderate rate and the acetylene very slowly.   Extent of
reaction could be judged either by the propene/acetylene ratio or by
the ethene/acetylene ratio.  To make  use  of both ratios the sum of the
three hydrocarbons was taken and each olefin expressed as a percentage
of the total.  These percentages for the batch irradiation of ambient
air samples gave Figure 39    when plotted against each other.  A
similar experiment carried out at the winter solstice (minimum solar
radiation) showed similar reactivity for both sunlight and ultraviolet
irradiation (Figure    40   ).   It is obvious that smog samples could
be plotted on this chart to judge the effective reaction time.  But it
should be remembered that these were batch experiments, whereas the
outside air has continuous addition of pollutants.  The other extreme
would be a stirred flow reactor at some stated residence time.  Since
there was no way to determine this on an ambient air sample the expected
behavior was calculated from the batch experiments.
     With constant intensity of irradiation (UV) the rate of disappearance
was nearly first order  (see Figure  36   ).  First order rate constants
derived from these laboratory data were then used to compute the theoretical
change in composition of the mixture  in the proportions given above both
for a batch reaction in which concentrations decrease exponentially
according to the equation C = C  exp(-kt) and for a stirred flow reactor
in which case the concentrations fall according to C = C (1 + kt)
These two extreme types of reactor give different plots as shown in
Figure   41   .  The actual atmosphere is probably somewhere between
these two.

-------
                                  61
   15 n
   10-
 2
Cu
   5-
     25
               AMBIENT AIR
                PHOTOLYSIS
               10. 24. 1966.
                      8
                                  HOURS
                                0      0
30           35           40
         % Ethene
                                                       L/V
45
                               Ratio   %   k 10 "
c
,«„*.« i
21 'DEC ''67 h°UrS '
: : o;o • :
i
sun :
2 • o 2
uv
rt
                   i 30 :          35
                   i     '?S  Ethene
                             FIGURE 40

-------
                           62
  15-
  10-
I
2
  5-
    25
              THEORY
                        Fresh
                      Exhaust
30          35

        % E t h e n e
                                      Batch
40
45
                       AMBIENT AIR PHOTOLYSIS.

              (Ethene + Propene + Acetylene =100 %)
                       FIGURE 41

-------
                                   63
     If additional exhaust gas  is added  to a  reacted mixture (say 10
hours batch reaction as shown in Figure   41   )  the composition will
be moved along the straight line marked  "fresh exhaust."  Such addi-
tion, of course, also lowers the average irradiation time  of the
mixture.  Since all types of history are possible, atmospheric
samples may lie anywhere within the crescent  area of Figure 41.
In Figure  42    are plotted the observed percentages  for  a number
        15
        10
      I
         5-
          25
                AMBIENT AIR SAMPLES
                (Hour and Date)
                                             Unreacted
             7300
             4.26O
   »i
/?
                            1445
                            10.9 O  100°  S
                   //
                                                J200
                                                8.27'
                 1610
                10.24
   1510
                                          '1314
                                           9.27
                                             (L.A.)
                                         '70 0.6 Oxid
30
   35
% Ethene
  40
45
                    EXTENT OF PHOTOLYSIS OF AMBIENT AIR.
                 (Ethene + Propene+ Acetylene = 100%)

                               FIGURE 42
of smog samples.  Most of the data lie  in or near  this  crescent.   In fact, the
two best sets of samples (9/6/68 and 10/24/68)  fall  near  each other
and between the curves for stirred flow and batch  reaction  near the
point corresponding to eight hours of irradiation.   The Pacific Standard

-------
                                    64
Time at which each group of samples was taken is given along with the
date.  All but one set of samples were taken in Riverside.   Although
there is considerable scatter the points do lie in the general area
of the stirred flow and batch reactor plots of Figure 41 and the
samples taken later in the day show the most reaction.
     The data for the 0.6 oxidant day of August 6, 1970 is slightly
below the curve for batch reaction.  It is tempting to interpret
this as meaning this air was reacted for several hours in isolation
from fresh exhaust.  Perhaps this could happen if a parcel of air
irradiated aloft were brought down to the surface.  Recent research
has suggested that high oxidant levels are sometimes formed aloft.
In such circumstances, a parcel of polluted air might undergo reaction
and then be brought down to the surface.
     The samples taken on 10/24/68 showed the highest degree of reac-
tion, along with some of the highest concentrations of any set of
samples.  These were taken in late afternoon just after a very sharp
pollution front passed Riverside.  By comparing this afternoon's
analysis with an unreacted morning sample it was possible to make a
crude estimate of the amounts of the various hydrocarbons which would
have been present if no reaction had occurred.   The following assump-
tions were needed:
     1)  Reaction equivalent to 10 hours in the ultraviolet bottle
reactor had occurred.   This was based on the plots shown in Figures
39 and  42.
     2)  A set of first order rate constants k.-(hr  ) were derived from
the bottle photolysis.   These were used in the first order stirred
flow rate expression C  = C(l + kt) with t = 10 hours to calculate the
amounts of acetylene and other hydrocarbons of low reactivity present
before reactions.   Use of batch kinetics would make little difference
here.
     3)  The amounts of ethene and propene were estimated from the
acetylene concentration and the ratios of these hydrocarbons in unreacted
exhaust.
     4)  The C,  and C  olefins before reaction were assumed to be equal
to the amounts found in the unreacted morning sample because the amounts

-------
                                   65
of Cr-C, paraffins were similar.  Both groups are probably derived
    D  o
primarily from gasoline.
     5)  A previously published analysis of "basin-mix" fuel was used
along with an estimated gasoline composition of H70 olefin, 3570
aromatic and 5470 saturate.  These were used to estimate the amounts
of higher hydrocarbons in the three classes which went unmeasured.
The higher saturates were assumed to have been comparable in
reactivity to the C..-C  paraffins and the higher olefins assumed to
be 907o reacted.   Reactivities for the aromatics were estimated from
                  Q
Stephens and Scott   (generally between ethene and propene except
benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene, all = 0).  These latter are extra-
polations on top of estimates so they must be quite crude.
     These results are summarized in Tables 12   and   13   .   The
total amount reacted is estimated to be just under 200 ppb which is
less than one-third of the amount initially present.  If auto exhaust
contains 250 ppm of acetylene and 1500 ppm of nitric oxide, we might
judge that before reaction this sample would have had 300 ppb of nitric
oxide.  It is somewhat surprising that reaction of 200 ppb of hydro-
carbon could accomplish the conversion of 300 ppb of nitric oxide to
nitrogen dioxide and the further reaction of this to PAN and other
products.  PAN and nitrogen dioxide only accounted for about one-third
of this estimated 300 ppb of nitric oxide.  Some of the samples shown
in Figure 42   were much less reacted than the sample of 10/24/68.
Even so they had the symptoms of air pollution even for these very
small degrees of reaction.  It would be interesting to try to determine,
using this kind of atmospheric data, the degree of reaction required to
reach some critical point of reaction such as the first appearance of
ozone.  One attempt was made to determine the first appearance of PAN
during laboratory irradiation of ambient air, but no lag was apparent.
The PAN began to form as soon as irradiation was started; it may be
that this ambient air sample was not completely unreacted at the
beginning.

-------
                                    66
Table 12  Estimate of amounts reacted in an ambient air sample compared to
an unreacted sample.
Reacted Sample (ppb)
1610 PST 1(5/24/68
Present Reacted (A)
Methane
Ethane
Propane
°Acetylene
Ethene
Propene
Methyl Acetylene
1,3-Butadiene
°l-Butene
Isobutene
Trans-2-Butene
Cis-2-8utene
2-Methyl Butene-1
Cyclo Pentene*
Trans-2-Pentene
2-Methyl Butene-2
plsobutane
N-butane
Isopentane
N-Pentaneb
Cyclo Pentane
2,2-Dimethyl Butane"
2,3-Oimethyl Butane
2-Methyl Pentaned
3-Methyl Pentane
N-hexane
2530
72.2
49.9
42.0
17.9
1.27
1.2
0.29
0.26
2.0
<0.2
<0.2
0.35
0.8
<0.2
<0.2
19.7
62.0
41.2
21.4
2.4
0.86
1.9
9.6
6.1
8.3
0
0.6
2.6
6.3
23.1
10.7
0.3
1.5
2.3
3.2
1.4
1.4
2.1
3.2
2.4
2.6
3.0
16.3
12.8
7.9
0.6
0.3

4.4
3.9
3.5
Unreactad Sample
(ppb)
0730 PST 9/24/68
Present
2355
63.6
18.8
77.0
65.6
19.2
2.6
3.6
2.6
5.2
1.4
1.4
2.4
4.4
2.4
2.6
8.0
27.6
39.2
22.4
3.2
1.6
3.8
12.4
8.4
9.0
Includes: • 2-Methyl Butadiene-1,3; b 3-Methyl Butene-1; c 1-Pentene; d Cis-2-Pentene.
C, O, P—See Table V
Table 13 Riverside ambient air (ppb) on roof of health-finance building.  1610 PST 10/24/68
(In ppb by volume except where noted.)
Compound
Ci - Cj Paraffins (meas.)
Non-fuel unsaturated0 (meas.)
C4 - d Olefins0 (meas.)
C< - C4 Paraffins1" (meas.)
Higher olefins (est.)
Higher saturates (est.)
Aromatics (ast.)
Total (less CH4)
Total (ppbC. incl CH4, GLC)
Total (ppbC, non GLC)
Acetylene
Carbon monoxide
Oxidant
Nitrogen oxides
PAN
Present +
2652
62.7
3.4
173.5
2.2
42
67
473
4800
eono
42.0
5000
400
60
34
Reacted* =
3.2
41.9
18.6
52.7
19.6
21.0
40.9
198







Initial*
2655
104.6
22.0
226.2
21.8
63.0
107.9
671


48.3


300

a estimated
C, O, P—See Table IV

-------
                                   67
MODES OF REACTION
     This comparison of smog hydrocarbon distribution with  irradiated
samples indicated that hydrocarbons  of all  classes participated  in the
reaction.  Even the aromatics (except benzene)  react substantially in
the time available.  During the course of this  program Heuss and
                                                              12
Glasson at General Motors discovered that benzilic hydrocarbons
could be oxidized under atmospheric conditions  to peroxybenzoyl nitrate,
an extremely potent eye irritant.   This was  surprising not only because
of the eye irritation but also because  it  indicated  that  side chain
oxidation occurred.  In contrast,  xylenes  and mesitylene  produced PAN,
clearly showing that ring rupture  occured.
         OXIDATION  OF  MONO  AND DI ALKYL BENZENES
                                                    P  P
                                                      A
                               ^  ^         CH3
                          ^*"                           P  P
                   CH*   	^       CHoCf  N(
                      3                               3 bo'o
                CH3

-------
                                    68
       This  striking difference in products clearly indicates a differ-
  ence in active  species attacking the hydrocarbon.  The active species
  most suggested  for this role are atomic oxygen, ozone and hydroxyl
  radicals.   Ozone  reacts rapidly with olefins but its reaction with
  aromatics  is  too  slow to be considered.  Atomic oxygen is known to attack
  aromatic hydrocarbons in the ring so it might be suspected that side
  chain oxidation is initiated by hydroxyl radical.  Another possibility
  is the NO.  radical which is formed by the reaction of ozone with N(L.
  All these  active  species are present in steady state, and the probable
  reactions  and steady state equations are as follows:
                   REACTIVE SPECIES
                                                           0ka(NO9)
                                                    //-»\       a    *
                                                    (O) =  	
                                                           k3(02)(M)

O3              O3 + NO '      »  NO2 + O2                pka(NO2)
                                                      3      k4 (NO)
                N02 + 03-^1^N03 + 02                   R   (Q  ,
                             ,                      (N03)  =  —_L
                N03 + N02
OH
 It  is noteworthy that the N0_ steady state concentration is directly
 proportional to the ozone concentration and independent of the nitrogen

-------
                                   69
dioxide concentration.  Calculations based on published rate constants
yield an NO- concentration of 2 X 10"  (0_).

MECHANISM
     NO  + NO -»  2N02                  k
     N2°5 + H2° ~* 2HN°3                fast
                          k (NO )(0 )
     (N03) Steady State = _
    (NO)/(N02)  -» 0

      (N03) = 2 X 10"5 (03)
     There are a few hints in the literature that N0« might be able to
                                                                    13
abstract atomic hydrogen from organic molecules.  Principal evidence
is the ability of N_0  to react with aldehydes in air in the dark to
                                                              1 /
produce PAN.  Another reaction was attributed to N0» by Wilson

                          N°2 + °3 + S°2 "* aeroso1

If various species were attacking different hydrocarbons at different
rates, the rates of disappearance should vary during the course of the
reaction.  This did not seem to be true in the ambient air irradiations.
A test with three selected hydrocarbons (one paraffin, one olefin and
one aromatic) in the 20 liter bottle showed no variations in the rate
of consumption of all three hydrocarbons after five hours of irradiation.
(See Figure  43  )
     Since this was an uninformative result, it was decided to try to
maximize the opportunity for reaction of N0_.  This was done in two ways:

-------
                                70
  100 •







   70 •







   50




   40






   30 •
2  20
h
z
o
o
   10
             ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION IN 20 I.ITKR ROTTf.K
              ISOPENTANE   RATE = 0.093 hour
MliTA-XYLENE

       RATE =0-364

               hour
                             -1
                             234

                            HOURS OF IRRADIATION
                                 FIGURE 43

-------
                                   71
 1)  some high  concentration  experiments were done  in  the  long-path
 infrared  cell,  and  2)  the 50  liter  stirred flow reactor  was used
 with mixtures of NCL,  0- and  selected hydrocarbons in  the  dark.
 In  the infrared cell concentrations of 500-800 ppm of  an aromatic
 hydrocarbon were mixed with about 1000 ppm of nitric oxide and ozone
 (to generate NO- and N^Oj.) • Even at these high concentrations the
 reaction  was not fast.  Principal effort was directed  toward detec-
 tion and  measurement of peroxybenzoyl nitrate (PBzN).  This compound
                                — 1
 has a distinctive band at 987 cm~  which has been used to  identify PBzN
 produced  from benzaldehyde.   Electron capture chromatography was
 also used to  identify  the PBzN and PAN estimated  from  the  infrared
 spectra are given in Table  14.

                              TABLE  14

Toluene
Ethyl benzene
n-Butyl benzene
1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
HC ppm
590
737
581
633
PBzN
0.91
0.56
3.52
-
PAN
-
-
-
8.4
     This positive result showed that aromatic hydrocarbons  can  produce
PBzN in a dark reaction, but the very slow yields  indicate that  this
is of  little importance.
     Stirred flow experiments were then carried out at 3000 fold  lower
concentrations in the flow photoreactor.  Since longer  chain benzilic
hydrocarbons were more reactive than toluene, n-propyl  benzene was
included in this series.  The results indicate that at  this  concentra-
tion level little reaction occurs even in residence times of several hours.
     The hydrocarbon mixture, the N0«, and 0., were dispensed from
separate LPO tanks, using hi-pure N  as the diluent in  all cases.  LPO
concentrations were sought such that convenient dispensing rates through
the rotometer flow panel would admix with the carbon  filtered air in the
mixing manifold and pass finally into the 50 liter reaction bottle
producing approximately:

-------
         in the first experiment -
                                            72
                                 HC
                                 0
     200 ppb
     0.2 ppm
     0.5 ppm
         and in the remaining experiments -
                                 HC
                                 0
     200 ppm
     1.0 ppm
     2.5 ppm
              In all experiments acetylene was added to the HC LPO  tank  to
         assist in monitoring dispensing regularity and mixing.   In  the last
         experiment trans butene-2 was added to demonstrate the capability  of
         obtaining a dark reaction at the concentrations used in  the
         experiments with the equipment as it was presently devised.
              HC measurements were made by the standard concentration tech-
         nique, from samples taken at the 50 bottle inlet or exhaust  ports,
         and subsequently  analyzed on the appropriate FID gas chromatograph.
              N02 concentrations were determined colormetrically  using
         Saltzman's reagent.
              0  concentrations were determined using the Mast ozone  meter.

      TABLE 15. Reactivity of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Flow Photoreactor
                    ppb inlet
Page
 No.    Cond.
   52   2 hrs    232   210
        Dark
228   205
                                         ppm
        _EE^_25l}§U§t	EE2_i!}i£t_    ££!}§"§£_

        b   NC-d> T^C =  0,,     N0_    0,,    N(
46

48

1 hr 239 119
Dark
1 hr
Dark
232

249

108

123

.42
•
- off
scale
.13

.68

.32

.11

.09

.68

off     .99    .58    .18
scale

-------
                                            73
TABLE    (continued)

Page
No. Cond.
/55 1 hr
*< 55 2 hrs
Dark
»55 4 hrs
Dark
(7 1 hr
U-V
light
7 2 hrs
U-V
light
8 4 hrs
U-V
light
8 static
U-V
light
61 1 hr
Dark
61 2 hrs
Dark
62 4 hr
Dark
62 4 hrs
U-V
light
62 static
U-V
light
66 1 hr
Dark

C2=
230
227
232
243
249
243
[228
233
246
224
230

201
ppm
p_p_b inlet ppb exhaust ppm inlet exhaust
Cl0 NC30 T2C4= C2, CL0 NC30T2C4= 03 N02 ^ NO,,
280 - - 232 284 - - off 1.07
scale
284 - - 230 279 - - measurement taken 12 hrs
after end of expt
270 - - 236 266 - -
317 - - 233 294 - - same LPO tank as above; no
0,. or N0~ measurements taken
302 - - 250 288
284 - - 232 269
218 (T-0)] - (168 56 (T=24 hrs)]
218 - 230 - 230 - - - .37 .62
204 - 243 - 216
189 - 227 - 179
163 - 224 - 163
(192 - 69 (T=15 hrs)]
179 122 200 - 192 40 off 1.4 .23 1.3
scale
 Continuous experiments

-------
                                    74
     Table 16 summarizes the data for all of the experiments.   The percent
reactions of the aromatic hydrocarbons used are as follows:
               1 hr
DARK
2 hrs  4 hrs
C.0
1
NC_0
J
T2C4=
2%

neg

67%
2%

neg

-
2%

5%

-
1 hr
                                          7%
   LIGHT
2 hrs  4 hrs   static
                           5%
               5%
               75%
                                                               58%
 Based upon a 15 hour static reaction; presuming linearity, in 24 hours
 (as was the time with C 0), this NC 0 reaction would have gone to 93%.

     The 67% dark reaction (residence time = 1 hr)  of T»C = demonstrates
the capability of the hardware as devised and the suitability of the
concentrations of the other reactants.  The static  reactions demonstrate
a similar capability in the presence of U-V light.   Although the dark reaction
has been reported at considerably higher concentrations, the present series
of experiments suggest that at these lower concentrations the reaction
occurs at a rate too low for detection by the instrumentation and procedures
utilized.

-------
                                  75

                              References
 1.  Eggertsen, F. T., and Nelsen, F. M. "Gas Chromatographic Analyses
     of Engine Exhaust and Atmosphere," Anal. Chem.,  30: 1040-1043
     (June 1958).

 2.  Fink, U., Rank, D. H., and Wiggins, T. A. "Abundance of methane in
     the earth's atmosphere," J. Opt. Soc.  Amer., 54, 572-574 (1964).

 3.  Goldberg, L. , and Mu'ller, E. A. "The vertical distribution of nitrous
     oxide and methane in the earth's atmosphere," J. Opt. Soc.  Amer.,
     43, 1033-1036 (1953).

 4.  Maynard, J. B., and Sanders, W. N. JAPCA 19(7),  p.  505 (1969).

 5.  Stephens, E. R., and Burleson, F. R. Distribution of Light Hydrocarbons
     in Ambient Air  Paper 69-122, APCA Journal 19_(12) ,  929-936 (December,
     1969).

 6.  Stephens, E. R., E. F. Barley, and Burleson, F.  R.  Sources and
     Reactivity of Light Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air  Proc. API Div.  of
     Refining 4^, 466-483 (1967), Los Angeles, California, May 16, 1967.

 7.  Stephens, E. R., and Burleson, F. R. Analysis of the Atmosphere for
     Light Hydrocarbons  APCA Journal 1J (3), 147-153  (March, 1967).

 8.  Stephens, E. R., and Scott, W. E. Relative Reactivity of Various
     Hydrocarbons in Polluted Atmospheres Proc. API 42,  III, 665 (1962)
     San Francisco, California, May 17, 1962.

 9.  Glasson, W. A., and Tuesday, C. S. Hydrocarbon Reactivities in the
     Atmospheric Reaction of Nitric Oxide  ES&T 4(11) November 1970 p. 916.

10.  Stephens, E. R. Chemistry of Atmospheric Oxidants  Paper 68-57, 61st
     Annual Meeting, APCA, St. Paul, June,  1968. APCA Journal 19(3), 181  (March,  1969)

11.  Stephens, E. R. The Role of Oxygen Atoms in the  Atmospheric Reaction
     of Olefins with Nitric Oxide  Int. J.  Air Water  Poll. 10, 793-803
     (1966)

12.  Heuss, J. M., and Glasson, W. A. ES&T 2(12) December 1968 p.  1109.

13.  Tuesday, C. S. Symposium on Chem. Reactions in the  Lower and Upper
     Atmosphere, Interscience Pub., New York, p. 15,  (1961).

14.  Wilson, W. E., and Levy, A. API proj.  S-ll  Battelle Memorial Institute,
     Prog. Reports, August 1, 1968, August 1, 1969.

-------