UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON.,- D.C. 20460
JUL 25(997
• OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
Coordinating with the States on National
Priorities List Decisions,-- Issue Resolution
Process
FROM: '
TO:
PURPOSE
.Timothy Fields', Jr.,yActing Assistant Administrator
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Regional Administrators
Regions I - X
The.purpose of this memorandum is to describe the process
that will be employed in cases where a Regional Office of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends proposing
or placing a site on the National Priorities List (NPL), but the
State or Tribe (hereafter referred to as "State") opposes listing
the site.
BACKGROUND
The Department of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban '
Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, Fiscal
Year 1996, included a requirement that EPA must receive a
written request from the Governor of the State in order for the
Agency to propose to place a site on the.NPL, or to place a site
on the NPL. However, the Department of Veterans Affairs and
-------
- 2 - •
Housing and Ur.baii Development, and Independent Agencies
Appropriations Act, Fiscal Year 1997, Public Law 104-204, did not
contain such a requirement. On November 14, 1996, the Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) issued a memorandum
.- entitled, "Coordinating with the States on National Priorities
List Decisions". According to that memorandum, an EPA Regional
Office requests the position of the State on a site that the
Region is considering for NPL listing. The Regional
Administrator directs a written inquiry to the governor, with a
copy to the State commissioner. For some 'sites, a .State may not
agree that EPA should proceed with NPL listing. The purpose of
this memorandum is to outline the process that will be employed
when the State does not agree that a site should be listed, but
.the Region believes it has sufficient reasons to proceed with the
NPL listing .process.
IMPLEMENTATION
EPA Regional^ Offices have been seeking the position of the
States on sites that the Region is considering for NPL listing.
In some cases, the State may not agree that EPA should pursue NPL
listing, but the Region believes it has sufficient reasons to
proceed.
In these cases, the Region should work closely with the
State to try to resolve the issue .before raising it to EPA
Headquarters. The Region should take into account past, ongoing
and planned response actions by the State.
If the Region determines that the issue cannot be resolved
at the Regional level, the Regional Superfund Division Director
should inform the Director of the State, Tribal and Site
Identification Center (ST/SI) of the Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response (OERR) and/or the appropriate ST/SI Regional
Coordinator. OERR should then brief the Assistant Administrator
(AA) for Solid Waste and Emergency Response. The State should
have the opportunity to present its position in writing. The
OSWER AA will then decide whether to pursue NPL listing. A case
could arise where the Region notifies the State in writing of its
desire to proceed with listing a site and provides an appropriate
deadline for a response, but the State does not respond. In such
a case, EPA may proceed with the NPL listing process.
-------
- 3 -
CONCLUSION
The EPA Regional Offices have been working closely with the
States to ensure that sites are evaluated and that response
actions, if warranted, are taken as quickly as possible. EPA
will continue to work with the States to assess sites and.to '
prepare and submit .HRS packages for those sites that are the
highest priority for listing on the NPL. The Agency also will
coordinate with the ATSDR and the Natural Resource Trustees in
gathering information for the process.
If you or your staff have any questions, you may contact me
at (202) 260-4610, or Dave Evans, Director of the ST/SI Center,
at (703) 603-8885.
cc: . Steve Herman, OECA
Steve Luftig, OERR
Lisa Friedman, OGC
Jim Woolford, FFRRO
All OERR Center Directors
Site Assessment Contacts, Regions -I-X
Superfund Regional Division Directors
Regional Counsels, Regions I-X
------- |