Common Sense Initiative
Automobile Manufacturing Sector
U.S. Automobile Assembly Plants
and Their Communities
Environmental, Economic and
Demographic Profile
July 15, 1997
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I: DATABASE DESCRIPTION, FINDINGS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1-1 Introduction 1-1
1-2 Observations and Recommendations 1-2
1-3 Methodology 1-11
1-4 Summary of Data and Guidelines for Use 1-16
PARTH: INDUSTRY-WIDE DATA
A. U.S. Auto and Light Duty Truck Assembly Plants II-1
B. Environmental Characteristics of Assembly Plants
Trends in TRI Releases and Transfers by Assembly Plant 1991-1994 II-2
1994 TRI Releases & Transfers by Chemical:
Total for All Assembly Plants II-3
TRI Release and Transfer Trends by Assembly Plant 1991-1994 II-4
(by type of release and transfer)
TRI Chemicals 1991 Releases and Transfers 11-12
TRI Chemicals 1992 Releases and Transfers 11-14
TRI Chemicals 1993 Releases and Transfers 11-16
TRI Chemicals 1994 Releases and Transfers 11-18
VOC Emissions 1990 - 1994 11-20
NOx Emissions 1990 - 1994 11-21
Criteria Air Pollutant Attainment Status of Assembly Plant Locations (1994) .. 11-22
RCRA Waste Summary for U.S. Auto and Light Duty Truck Assembly Plants . 11-24
-------
PARTH: INDUSTRY-WIDE DATA (continued)
B. Environmental Characteristics of Assembly Plants (continued)
Summary of 1993 Hazardous Waste Managed, Total for Assembly Plants .... 11-25
(by waste type and management practice)
C. Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Assembly Plant Communities
County Economic and Demographic Characteristics 11-26
Population and Population Density 11-32
Minority Percentage 11-33
Percent Below Poverty Level 11-34
High School Incomplete Percentage 11-35
D. Assembly Plant Locations and Identification Numbers 11-36
PART III: ASSEMBLY PLANT- AND COMMUNITY-SPECIFIC DATA
Assembly Plant Locations: U.S. Map
Assembly Plant Locations: Michigan Detail Map
For each assembly plant:
[An example for one plant-community is included in this report.]
Plant-Community Profile
Plant Location
List of TRI Sources Reported Within 3 Miles of the Assembly Plant
Map: Area-Wide 1994 TRI Profile
1994 TRI Releases & Transfers "from All Sources within 3-Mile
Radius of the Assembly Plant (by chemical and type of release/transfer)
Map: Demographic Characteristics of Local Area
Map: Demographic Characteristics of County
-------
APPENDICES
Appendix A: CSI Auto Sector Subcommittee and Project Team A-l
Appendix B: Description of the Common Sense Initiative B-l
Appendix C: Data Work Group Members C-l
Appendix D: Description and Use of TRI Data D-l
Appendix E: Description and Use of RCRA Biennial Report Data E-l
Appendix F: Verification of Assembly Plant Location Coordinates F-l
Appendix G: Description of Data Corrections G-l
Appendix H: Attainment Status Classifications H-l
Appendix I: Methodology for 3-Mile Radius Demographic Profiles 1-1
Appendix J: Plants Closed or Converted 1991-1994 J-l
-------
Part I:
Database Description, Findings
and Recommendations
July 15, 1997
-------
PART I: PROFILE DESCRIPTION, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1-1 INTRODUCTION
This document presents information about automobile assembly plants in the United States
and the communities in which they are located. A multi-stakeholder team ("Project Team") compiled
it as a project of the Common Sense Initiative (CSI) for the Automobile Manufacturing Sector (see
Appendix A for lists of the Auto Sector Subcommittee and Project Team members). CSI is a
experiment to see if a diverse group of stakeholders in a given industrial sector can develop cleaner,
cheaper, and smarter ways to protect the environment (see Appendix B for information about CSI).
The CSI Project Team formed a multi-stakeholder "work group" to produce this data package (see
Appendix C).
A compiled information base includes environmental, economic and demographic data. This
variety reflects the team's desire to improve understanding by all stakeholders about sector-and
community-related issues. In particular, the Project Team recognized that automobile manufacturing
facilities operate within and as part of their communities, and so the report includes information
about those communities.
The report is organized into three main parts. The first part, which is this section, provides
background information. As with any effort of this type, important discussions of methodology
direct the reader to consider data limitations. This part also presents condensed summaries of the
data and some lessons learned while compiling the package.
The second part of the report contains sector-wide summaries of the raw data. For the
purposes of this report as well as how CSI defined this sector, the universe of facilities was limited
to automobile and light duty truck assembly plants. The third part of the report, which should
interest assembly plant communities, provides local community and plant specific information.
The report's appendices provide additional technical detail.
While the Project Team attempted to compile a breadth of relevant data, information sources
were incomplete. By publishing this effort, the Project Team hopes to encourage a dialogue about
which data are useful for characterizing an industry or a community and how this type of information
can best be presented and used to meet the needs of various stakeholders.
1-1
-------
1-2 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A key goal of this project was to compile publicly available economic, demographic .and
environmental data for auto assembly communities and for the auto assembly sector as a whole.
Another goal was to examine how existing data resources could be used to support experiments in
community-based and sector-wide environmental decision-making.
MAIN OBSERVATIONS
The Project Team found that existing data resources are not well suited to industrial sector-
wide, single facility multi-media or community-wide assessments. The Project Team also found that
the reviewed data bases were, to varying degrees, incomplete, inaccurate, not current or not easily
accessible.
MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The EPA should explore ways to improve the viability, accessibility and
usefulness of data resources. If other community-based or industry sector-
based initiatives are undertaken, improved reporting formats, uses of data or
presentations are needed and should involve industry, environmental groups,
state and local governments and other stakeholders.
2. The EPA should take steps to address the problems of data accuracy,
completeness and consistency that were identified by the Project Team.
DETAILED OBSERVATIONS
The following observations describe a number of challenges and difficulties encountered by
the Project Team in compiling data on assembly plants and their communities. These observations
provide the basis for the Project Team's recommendations.
Sector Definition
The Standard Industrial Classification system (SIC) is a logical starting place for defining
a sector of interest and accessing data on that sector. If a sector is defined well by a single SIC or
combinations of SICs, then collecting environmental and economic data will be relatively
straightforward.
1-2
-------
In many cases, however, SICs are too broad, capturing facilities with very different technical
and economic characteristics. Where SICs do not provide a useful definition of a sector, data
collection may require a plant-by-plant approach. Such a plant-by-plant approach may not be
feasible if the sector in question is not extensively reported on (e.g., by trade associations and trade
literature) and/or if the sector includes large numbers of small facilities (e.g., electroplating).
SICs 3711' and 37132 include vehicle body suppliers as well as assembly plants, and include
heavy-duty trucks, buses and other vehicles as well as autos and light-duty trucks. For this project,
therefore, the SIC categories were too broad for defining the sector of interest. EPA and industry
sources were used to define the universe of plants in the sector. The primary EPA resource was the
list of plants reporting to TRI for SICs 3711 and 3713 followed by a review to identify auto and LDT
assembly plants. The primary industry resource was a list generated by AAMA and verified by
company personnel. The Project Team also referred to published production data and obtained a
final review by government and industry officials to ensure that the listed plants were currently
operating (in 1995) assembly plants rather than parts suppliers or other types of facilities.
It was difficult in some cases to determine whether co-located plants should be treated as one
or two plants, and what portions of a plant or facility complex should be included as "assembly."
The TRI ID numbers were found to be the most consistent way to identify a facility, given
inconsistencies across data sources in plant names, addresses, and plant status (operating versus
temporarily or permanently closed). Even the TRI identifiers were not entirely consistent, however,
because there is some variation in how companies report adjacent plants in the TRI program.
Temporal Considerations
The Project Team constructed a history of plant openings and closings over the time period
of interest (1991-1994), and collected environmental data for plants that closed during the period.
This effort was complicated because the operating status of plants changes with relative frequency.
During the period of interest, several plants opened, closed, or closed temporarily to convert to
producing a different vehicle or from assembly to a different manufacturing process. Plants also
may temporarily shut down for various other reasons. The Project Team needed help from industry
officials to distinguish temporary from permanent closings.
1 "Motor Vehicles and Passenger Car Bodies"
2 "Truck and Bus Bodies"
1-3.
-------
Normalization
The interpretation of trends is improved by distinguishing fluctuations in releases caused by
changes in production levels from trends due to other factors (changes in production technology,
pollution prevention, vehicle size, configuration, product mix, etc.). The Project Team collected
annual production data (number of vehicles) for each assembly plant. Production data were generally
available from published trade sources, but some special data collection by the American
Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) was required to provide data on a consistent basis
over the time period of interest. Specifically, the published production data reported for 1992 and
after were based on the calendar year while earlier data were based on a vehicle model year.
Having the production data allowed the Project Team to calculate normalized trends — that
is, trends in emissions or waste quantities generated per vehicle produced ~ as well as aggregate
trends. Calculation of trends in releases per vehicle produced provides a more consistent basis for
measurement, but improvements may be possible to account for variability in vehicle sizes,
configuration and product mix.
Sector Economic Data
Environmental data are generally reported by facility (source), but economic data generally
are not. For example, data on production are publicly-reported by plant for the auto industry (though
not for all industries), but data on employment and other economic data (e.g., profits) are not. Such
data can often be obtained at the sector level, for sectors that can be defined by SIC codes, from
Census and other government data sources. For the automobile/light-duty truck assembly sector,
these SIC-based data sources were too inclusive and lack of facility-level economic data precluded
building a sector-level economic profile from individual plant data (as was done with the
environmental data).
Community Information
As a first step in developing plant-community profiles, the Project Team collected a limited
set of data on local resident characteristics, local employment, and the assembly plant itself. EPA
Region 4 collected three types of demographic data for this purpose (population minority percentage,
income and education level). Then, to provide a more complete picture of auto plant community
characteristics, the Project Team added other kinds of economic and demographic data — e.g.,
manufacturing employment, median household income, and population age.
1-4
-------
Economic and demographic data were more readily available by geographic units below the
state level than were environmental data. A key issue in gathering such data was the choice between
using standard geographic areas (Census units, counties and states) used in data bases versus
collecting data for specially-designed areas (e.g., 3-mile circles around assembly plants). The latter
approach allowed a more precise definition of a plant's immediate "neighborhood" but involved
substantially more work.
Economic and demographic data for areas around plants (1-, 3- and 5-mile radius circles)
were compiled by EPA Region 4. Sources of environmental releases in a 3-mile area around
assembly plants were identified using the TRI data. Any environmental, demographic and economic
data that are identified by location (e.g. latitude/longitude coordinates) can be aggregated into areas
more relevant to a particular plant and community, using Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
methods. Developing data for tailored geographic regions was complicated by inaccuracies in
reported geographic location identifiers, as described later in this section.
Researchers may determine which information to include in a community profile in various
ways. Like geographic scope, the decision will often depend on preference, convenience, capability
and objectives. Likewise, the community definition itself (neighborhood, county, watershed, etc.)
should reflect the objectives of each particular project.
Data Accessibility and Management
Currently, substantial environmental information is collected on individual plants that can
be used to characterize facilities, industries and communities. EPA is working to improve data
management through such efforts as the Facility Identifier Initiative and electronic data interchange
(EDI). On-line access to the TRI database is good and improving rapidly and the data are available
for purchase on CD-ROM. The TRI data management process provides a verification and update
procedure to ensure the accuracy of data provided to the public.
Data Compilation
Substantial programming effort was involved to compile the information in the format
provided in this document. To use the key data sources, users must have access to a computer with
sufficient disk space, a modem with reasonable speed, and (in the case of the TRI CD ROM) a CD
drive and sufficient memory to take advantage of these resources. Each database requires expertise
on the database structure and definitions, on specific quirks in each data source, on the software
needed to access and analyze the data, and on appropriate ways of interpreting the data.
The Project Team found that existing "preprogrammed formats" were insufficient for this
effort. Extensive programming, using multiple databases, was required to produce some profile
1-5
-------
formats. Other databases required manipulation of the data using various database programs (e.g.,
Paradox, Access, Lotus or Excel) to produce other community and/or sector formats.
A major source of complexity in using the BRS and TRI data is multiple entries for some
data items. The basic unit in the BRS data is the waste stream. Each waste stream may be identified
by multiple waste codes, and may be managed by multiple methods at multiple facilities. The
national BRS database is formatted in a number of "flat files" which contain different portions of
the data and with identifiers that allow linking the data in different files for the same waste streams.3
This requires programming effort, and can be a source of error. Similarly, the basic unit of reporting
for the TRI data is a TRI chemical. For each chemical, submitters may report multiple off-site
management methods and locations. Care must be taken to capture all off-site destinations to
calculate quantities transferred off-site for different management methods accurately.
Interpretation and Technical Support
Certain misinterpretations or inappropriate uses of data may occur as data become more
available to a wide range of users. For example, Project Team members expressed concern that
presenting a single plant's contribution to an area's emissions inventory using TRI data may be
misleading because of absent or incomplete information about the relative contributions of other
sources.
The Project Team also expressed concern about the common practice of summing TRI
releases and transfers from a specific source and inappropriate interpretation of the sum. Because
transfers include recycling or other treatment to reduce further releases, they have very different
implications for environmental impacts ~ both in total and in location — than do direct releases from
plants. Totals for releases and transfers were reported separately in this document.
Good technical support should help prevent interpretive errors. In this project, the Project
Team found the documentation of the technical aspects of the major databases (TRI and BRS) to be
3 To create the profiles in this report, for example, data from "flat files" Gl and G2 was
linked to line up waste codes with other waste descriptors. In addition, data from flat files G4 and
G5 were linked to the G1/G2 data to characterize management practices for each waste stream. Care
~ and sometimes observation-by-observation investigation — was required to avoid double-counting
quantities generated in the process of linking files. In addition, there were discrepancies between
the various files, caused (sometimes) by data entry errors or (more often) by missing observations.
1-6
-------
generally good. User support staff was also helpful in answering specific questions.4 However,
general guidance on the interpretation and use of the data was limited in most cases and did not exist
for criteria air pollutant data.
Reporting Practices
In the RCRA biennial report data some plants listed less than ten separate waste streams and
other plants reporting more than 70 individual waste streams. Given the similarity of the basic
processes (e.g., painting) that generate wastes at assembly plants, this diversity may indicate
differences in company data collection and reporting practices, as well as differences in waste
characteristics. More investigation would have been needed to determine how these differences in
reporting practices affect interpretation of the data.
Reporting practices also vary among states. For example, no BRS data on waste physical
form or source were found in the national database for plants located in Ohio. In addition, states
differ in the extent to which they require reporting on hazardous waste waters managed under the
Clean Water Act in the biennial report system. These inconsistencies limit users' ability to calculate
totals and make comparisons at the sector level.
Data Quality
The Project Team encountered some data quality problems in the course of its work.
Appendices F and G describe the results of the data quality review process. In addition, the Project
Team discovered a general error in the CD-ROM version of the TRI database. The data for releases
and the totals for transfers are correct; however, the data on transfers by type of transfer (e.g., energy
recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal) are not correct, due to a programming error. The EPA
plans to correct this error on the CD-ROM containing the 1991-1995 data (to be published shortly).5
For this document, the Project Team relied on EPA's in-house version of the database to compile
data on transfers of TRI chemicals by type.
4 Technical documentation includes copies of the reporting forms and instructions, and
directions for accessing and manipulating the data.
5 The TRI data in EPA's version in-house of the TRI database and the National Library
of Medicine TRI database (which is available on-line to the public) were not affected by this error.
It has not yet been determined whether the version of the TRI data provided by RTKNet (a non-
profit network) — also available to the public — are affected by the error.
1-7
-------
Data Completeness and Timeliness
Incomplete or out-of-date data were found to be a problem more often than incorrect data.
Three national data sources in particular were found to be very incomplete or out-of-date:
AIRS: Data were missing in the national AIRS database for most facilities. The Project
Team collected data for VOC and NOx emissions directly from the states, to fill in the gaps.
Even with this effort, however, data were not available in all cases and care was needed to
ensure that the states provided data on the same basis as AIRS (i.e., actual emissions rather
than allowable).
PCS: This data base appeared incomplete regarding permit status for several plants. While
this raised a number of questions, it was not followed up due to a combination of time
limitations and issues of scope.
RCRIS: Similarly, this database appeared incomplete for similar reasons. As with the PCS,
no further action was taken.
Definition of "Facility"
Collecting data from multiple sources for the same facilities was hindered by inconsistencies
across data bases in the methods used to identify facilities. Obtaining EPA program-specific
identification numbers for the active assembly plants was complicated by the fact that different
names and addresses were sometimes used in reporting. Also, several facilities have plants close
or adjacent to each other with different TRI and RCRA identification numbers. Regulatory
variations in the definition of facility across programs complicated compilation of data and
comparisons across plants.
Location Coordinates
Similarly, mapping environmental data was complicated by inconsistencies and inaccuracies
in the location coordinates reported by facilities. The Project Team used the latitude and longitude
coordinates reported in the TRI database as a starting point. EPA has developed "preferred
coordinates" for cases where the latitudes and longitudes reported by facilities appear to be
inaccurate. The Project Team reviewed these preferred coordinates and found additional cases where
1-8
-------
corrections were needed. EPA plans to address issues identified with the process of selecting TRI
preferred locations, particularly for plants with large sites, in creating the 1994 TRI GIS files.6
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on its experience compiling the data hi this report, the Project Team recommends that
EPA continue efforts in two directions to improve data support for future community and sector-
based initiatives. These two efforts address the accessibility and usefulness of data on one hand, and
the basic quality of data on the other. The Project Team recommends that industry, environmental
groups and other stakeholders be involved in both efforts.
1.1 jx- uaoiv/ i^uain^ i/j. uaia \ju iiiv uuii/i. A nw x iuji/vi i i/tuii n
groups and other stakeholders be involved in both efforts.
The EPA should explore ways to improve the viability, accessibility and
usefulness of data resources. If other community-based or industry sector-
based initiatives are undertaken, improved reporting formats, uses of data or
presentations are needed and should involve industry, environmental groups,
state and local governments and other stakeholders.
The Project Team attempted to develop multimedia profiles which provided
environmental, economic, and demographic data in both a community and
industrial sector format. Substantial progress was made in this project
compiling data in new formats. However, questions of data viability,
accessibility and usefulness remain.
More extensive guidance on use and interpretation of such resources is
needed for appropriate use of data by a more diverse user community. For
example, explicit warnings about potential double-counting errors that may
result when using data elements with multiple observations per waste or
chemical is needed.
It would be impossible to define data and reporting formats that would meet
all users' needs. Greater use of "relational databases" would better serve a
full range of environmental analysis and inquiry. Access to such resources
could be improved and technical support for users would help assure
appropriate interpretation.
6 Information on methods used to evaluate and correct location coordinates is provided
in Appendix F of this document.
1-9
-------
EPA publishes some summaries of the data (notably TRI and BRS).7 In
addition, the TRI database provides a small number of "preformatted" reports
that can be used without special programming. However, many emerging
uses are not well-served by these summaries and formats. EPA could develop
additional report formats that users could access without special
programming. This would improve the usefulness of data for community and
sector-based initiatives. For example:
Plant/Source Profiles: Preformatted "profiles" for individual sources or
plants, which included data from various data bases, could be developed.
Such profiles might be accessed on-line with a user-friendly front end for
selecting plants.
Area Profiles: Areas might be defined in different ways to support different
uses, including fixed reporting boundaries (county, MSA, or ZIP code) and
areas (e.g., 3- or 5-miles) around specific sources or environmental resources
(located by lat/long coordinates).
2. The EPA should take steps to address the problems of data accuracy,
completeness and consistency that were identified by the Project Team.
To the extent possible, a quality assurance/quality control process should be
established where it currently is lacking. For example, the final BRS
database is not corrected when errors are found by users. Maintaining a
dynamic database presents certain problems. However, some errors are likely
to remain hidden until the data are used, even if data entry forms have been
quality controlled. It is therefore useful to have a mechanism for making
corrections after the data are made available to users. The use of revised
"Form Rs" to make corrections to the TRI data is a good model for this
process.
In addition, EPA should develop a strategy to correct incomplete or out-of-
date data. For example, lack of available VOC and NOx data in EPA's
AIRS and state air program databases presented significant obstacles to
summarizing a major environmental parameter for auto assembly plants.
7 For example, totals by waste or chemical, totals by state, and a variety of "Top 10" lists.
MO
-------
EPA should also develop a strategy for improving the accuracy of location
coordinates in various databases. For example, EPA could provide a map
showing the location of each plant/source as identified by submitted latitude
and longitude, and ask submitters to verify the locations.
Finally, EPA should review the various reporting requirements that are the
source of much of the relevant data, and assess whether current methods for
reporting, submitting and maintaining data are sufficient to make those data
available and useful for community- and industry sector-based efforts. In
particular, EPA should determine whether AIRS, PCS, RCRIS and other
national databases can be better maintained and quality checked, so that the
data being collected are more useful for a variety of purposes.
1-3 METHODOLOGY
Defining the Universe of Facilities
The first task of the work group was to define the universe of assembly plants to be covered
by the data compilation. A decision was made early in the development process to include
automobile and light duty truck assembly plants. The sector is loosely defined by the Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 3711 and 3713. These codes also include truck, bus and other
vehicle manufacturing and equipment suppliers, so by themselves they are too broad to define the
universe. Thus, the group also used EPA and industry sources to produce a list of subject plants.
EPA used the SIC codes as reported to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) to produce an
initial list of plants.8 Other EPA data bases (AIRS, PCS, BRS and RCRIS) were also compared in
an attempt to confirm this list.9 Several identifiers were used in this process: plant name, address,
data base identification number and geographic location identifiers (latitude and longitude). Each
data base was found to identify plants differently, often resulting in multiple identifiers for single
plants and significant inconsistencies among the data bases.
8 TRI provides data on chemical specific release and transfers for all environmental media.
9 AIRS is the Aerometric Information Retrieval System, which contains data on air
emissions for criteria pollutants tracked under the Clean Air Act (CAA). PCS is the Permit
Compliance System, which contains information about permitted releases to surface water under the
Clean Water Act. BRS is the Biennial Reporting System, which contains hazardous waste reports
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRIS is the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Information System, which identifies RCRA-permitted facilities.
1-11
-------
Independently, the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) produced a
list from its own published sources. In this process, information emerged about plants that were
about to open, close or convert to different types of facilities; some definitional questions also started
to appear. These issues are discussed below.
The two lists were then compared and consolidated, with another review of plant names,
addresses and locations to help resolve discrepancies. This effort brought to light concerns regarding
the accuracy of the latitude/longitude location identifiers and the methodology used to establish these
numbers. Since the work group wanted to examine existing data from the community's perspective,
the location of plants was a necessary data element. As a result of this finding, EPA is revising their
approach for verifying location coordinates for plants with large acreage sites.
At this point, industry representatives helped resolve two definitional problems. One
situation involved two facilities that were located next door to each other, where one facility made
a vehicle part that was supplied to the facility next door during the assembly process. The other
situation involved a plant complex that passed partly assembled vehicles between two sections of
the complex. The EPA data bases counted these plants differently, which had caused some
confusion. The work group decided to count each situation as one assembly plant.
The final result was an agreed-upon list of 56 automobile and light duty truck assembly
plants that were operating in the United States in early 1995. For this report, all plants were assigned
numbers (1 through 56) that were used consistently throughout the report for identification purposes.
For additional reference, the package also includes identity information derived from the EPA data
bases reviewed — regulatory program ID numbers and location identifiers (see the Part HI profiles).
Determining the Universe for the Period 1991-1994
Since the work group also was interested in discerning data trends, it decided to examine data
for the period beginning in 1991. Where possible, the group used 1994 as the base year because that
was the latest year for which TRI data were available (at time of compilation). To develop a
consistent basis, the group needed to know which plants were operating during that period and which
changed operating status (permanently closed, temporarily closed, newly opened or converted). The
work group was unable to locate a central or published source of information about changes in plant
operating status, so it relied on a review of the EPA data bases and Automobile News production
data. Through these, the group identified an additional set of plants that had operated between 1991
and 1994 but were closed by 1995. The work group spent less effort verifying this list up front than
with the 1995 universe.
1-12
-------
Normalizing environmental release data on some basis reduces some of the effects of activity
level from other factors that can affect environmental data such as vehicle size, configuration,
technology and pollution prevention efforts. The number of vehicles produced per year was the most
easily obtained statistic for this purpose (although it has some limitations as a basis for normalizing,
as noted in Section 1-4). Two primary sources were used: Automotive News and Ward's Automotive
Reports: Both of these are widely available and widely used resources.
Prior to 1992, plants reported production volume according to the model year of the vehicle.
Beginning in 1992, most plants reported the data by calendar year. Since all the available
environmental data had a calendar year basis, the production volumes had to have the same basis.
Therefore, these data for 1991 -1994 were checked and corrected as necessary.
Environmental Data
As noted above, the work group reviewed several existing EPA-managed air, water,
hazardous waste and Toxics Release Inventory data bases for information relevant either to the
assembly plant universe or the communities in which the plants are located. This information was
compiled for both the sector as a whole and for individual communities. In addition to relevance,
the work group examined the data bases for completeness and reliability. In general, the group
reviewed only existing and publicly available national data sources, filling gaps on a case-by-case
basis as feasible.
In part, the group wanted to demonstrate the availability, extent and quality of these types
of sources on behalf of others who might attempt a project similar to this one. The group found that
any interested party could reproduce this effort. Substantial investments of time, computer resources
and skills were needed, however, to physically collect, format and, where possible, verify the data.
In keeping with the general goal of characterizing the auto sector environmentally, as a sector
and within a community context, the group researched the data bases for pollutant releases. This
information was provided by the AIRS, BRS and TRI data bases. For the years 1990-1994, AIRS
provided varying amounts of data on emissions of ozone precursors (NOx and VOC). The data base
was disappointing for its apparent incompleteness and slowness to update. The completeness of the
database depends on timely data submission by the states to EPA. To fill gaps, an EPA consultant
contacted state air pollution control agencies, with care taken to ensure that the same reporting basis
was used throughout the compilation (i.e., actual emissions and not potential or allowable). The
group did not attempt to collect data on emissions of other Clean Air Act criteria pollutants (S02,
CO, PM10, lead) from the states.
The BRS provided information about the amount of waste generated from RCRA-listed
hazardous waste streams. Since this report is biannual, the group reviewed data for 1991 and 1993,
the most recent years available.
1-13
-------
As for the Permit Compliance System (PCS) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Information System (RCRIS), the Project Team found little data relevant to this effort other than
facility identification numbers.
Of all the data bases, the group found the TRI to best meet its criteria of accessibility,
completeness, reliability and timeliness. The TRI reports data on the releases and transfers of several
hundred listed chemicals.
The other side of the community's environmental picture is information about the ambient
conditions where the plants are located. The group relied mostly on CAA attainment status for
ozone, which may be rated as attainment for the ozone national ambient air quality standard,
maintenance,10 transition (from nonattainment to attainment), moderate nonattainment, serious
nonattainment and severe nonattainment. Only a few plants are located in nonattainment areas for
SO2 and particulates.
Other information relevant to the quality of the environments surrounding assembly plants
includes emissions from other nearby sources of pollution. TRI provided the most readily
accessible, geographic-based data that could be used for this purpose, although TRI data are not
complete because many sources are not covered by the TRI reporting requirements. The results are
seen in Part III, where the community profiles are presented.
A major area not addressed in this effort was ambient environmental data (e.g., water quality
monitoring data) for communities.
Compiling Community-Related Information
The work group considered recognition of the community point of view as an important goal
of the Project Team and its work to develop an alternative regulatory system. Thus, this package
attempted to create "profiles" of assembly plant communities by assembling data available for these
locations.
A variety of approaches for selecting community boundaries, as suggested by EPA data bases
and other resources, were considered. EPA maintains air quality information on the basis of Air
10 Recently reclassified as attainment and required to have maintenance plans with
contingency measures.
1-14
-------
Quality Control Regions, which may encompass several counties or parts of counties. "Census
tracts," which are defined to include between 2,500 and 8,000 residents, are generally smaller than
counties. County data are routinely used in both environmental and non-environmental data
resources. The size and shape of all these geographic units can vary considerably.
While considering these, the work group became aware that any geographic unit definition
will present some technical nuances and limitations. In addition to using these standard reporting
units, the group used an approach based on uniform, circular, user-defined areas around assembly
plants. Such areas can be defined for any size using computerized Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) software. EPA Region 4 also was able to compile census and demographic data on this basis.
This approach, which depends on the accuracy of the latitude and longitude coordinates, can lead
to a more tightly defined area around a given plant. Of those data bases examined by the work
group, most of the environmental data bases use latitudes/longitudes as plant location identifiers
while most non-environmental resources are reported by census categories or counties.
Economic Data
For context about the industry as well as enhancing the plant-community link, the work
group found that current plant-specific economic data, such as employment levels or local taxes,
often are considered sensitive information or simply are not generally available. Rather, current data
are published in aggregate form, such as on a state-wide basis. Older information may be available
but are not routinely or centrally maintained. For this sector, AAMA obtained employment data for
1994 and Chrysler provided data for earlier years. Obtaining data for all plants for previous years
would have required significant additional effort.
A large amount of published statistics about the industry are readily available, although not
on a plant specific basis. The work group decided to include some of these published statistics for
background.
Demographic Information
To further characterize assembly plant communities, the work group decided to include
demographic and economic data, including population and population density, race and ethnicity,
age characteristics, educational attainment, income and poverty status, and employment
characteristics and unemployment rate.
1-15
-------
Data Quality Issues
Efforts have been made to ensure that the data presented here are accurate. The work group,
however, could not independently verify the data's accuracy in all cases. When errors were
discovered, the group corrected the appropriate table and notified the EPA data manager where
appropriate. (See Appendix G for a description of the data quality review.) Generally, however, the
data in this package are derived from those that were originally reported to the government.
1-4 SUMMARY OF DATA AND GUIDELINES FOR USE
General Guidelines
The data in this document provide a multi-faceted picture of assembly plants and their
communities. It is important to keep several general principles in mind to avoid mis-using or
misinterpreting the data. The issues noted below include only those that sector participants
identified, so the list may be incomplete.
First, the current releases presented in this report may represent only a portion of the sources
of contamination in a local area. Past activities in a community may have contributed substantially
to current soil, groundwater, and surface waters conditions.. This is especially true of industrial and
agricultural activities that occurred prior to the implementation of modern environmental regulations
starting in the late 1970s.
In addition, the non-auto emission sources shown in the report were identified only through
one data base, the TRI. Other current sources may exist in an area that are not required to report to
TRI for various reasons and may or may not be represented in other EPA data bases. These sources
may fall under the TRI threshold, they may have non-TRI-listed releases, or they may not be among
the list of activities required to file reports. The work group did not review EPA's other data bases
or other possible data sources to compile a comprehensive listing of these other sources. Significant
sources of pollution in a given area may include non-manufacturing, non-commercial or non-
agricultural sources, such as everyday human activities and biogenic processes.
Second, environmental releases from assembly plants depend heavily on the activity level
of the facility. Changes in production level and product mix over time at individual plants greatly
influence trends in environmental releases. The painting operation is a major source of
environmental releases, and the amount of painting depends on the number of vehicles produced and
on the size and configuration of those vehicles, in addition to other factors. In an attempt to
normalize the data for this effect, the work group used production data in Section 1-4 to assess
1-16
-------
release trends. Some data were analyzed separately for automobile and light duty truck assembly
plants, but it was not possible to normalize the data to remove the effect of vehicle size (or
configuration) on environmental releases.
Third, changes in the universe of assembly plants affect aggregate environmental trends at
the industry level. To assess aggregate trends for the entire sector, it would be necessary to include
data on plants that operated between 1991 and 1994 but that were not included in the universe of 56.
The analysis of changes over time includes only the assembly plants included in the universe of 56
plants. Because plants opened and closed during the time period covered, the analysis of aggregate
trends for these 56 plants will under- or over-state changes for the sector as a whole.
Fourth, care must be taken to distinguish true changes in environmental releases from
apparent changes, such as those caused by different reporting requirements or practices, changes in
the scope of reporting requirements (e.g., added or delisted chemicals or wastes), changes in the
applicability of a reporting requirement, changes in the definition of facility or source, or other
changes in the underlying definitions.
Even after considering these issues, other factors can affect a plant's environmental profile.
These factors include, for example, plant age, process equipment age, vehicle size and configuration,
on-site parts production, the type of painting and other processes used, and the range of assembly
tasks performed at the plant. Some plants are highly-integrated, performing some parts and all
assembly steps in-house. Others obtain parts from other manufacturing facilities. In addition, plants
located in nonattainment areas are subject to different limitations on criteria pollutant air emissions
than plants located in attainment areas or in or near Clean Air Act Class I ("pristine") areas. New
plants, modifications or expansions are subject to certain additional requirements that older,
unchanged plants do not face. Differences in the environmental characteristics of plants (e.g., in total
releases, waste generation and releases/generation per vehicle produced) therefore often reflect the
effects of physical and legal factors rather than particular management decisions.
The following sections describe the individual data sources used for this report, including
guidelines for interpreting the data that are specific to each source, and summarize the data.
Overview of U.S. Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
The following data are taken from the American Automobile Manufacturers Association
publication Motor Vehicle Facts and Figures 1996. These data provide an overview of the U.S.
motor vehicle manufacturing industry. The scope of these data is somewhat broader than the 56
assembly plants discussed elsewhere in this document, because they include manufacture of larger
trucks as well as manufacture of automobiles and light duty trucks. In addition, these data are for
calendar year 1995. The data compiled specifically for this report generally cover only 1991
through 1994. The data in this section, while not directly comparable to the data compiled for this
1-17
-------
report, provide a useful current overview of the motor vehicle manufacturing sector as context.
These data were not included in the data summaries provided in later parts of this section or in the
Part II and Part HI data tables.
Table 1-1 shows U.S. production of all motor vehicles from 1930 through 1995. These data
include automobiles, trucks, and buses, and are taken from Ward's Automotive Reports and AAMA
data.
Table 1-1
ANNUAL U.S. MOTOR VEHICLE PRODUCTION
Year
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1965
1960
1955
1950
1945
1940
1935
1930
Passenger Cars
6,350,367
6,613,970
5,981,046
5,664,203
5,438,579
6,077,449
6,823,097
7,113,137
7,098,910
7,828,783
8,184,821
7,773,332
6,781,184
5,073,496
6,253,138
6,375,506
8,433,662
9,176,635
9,213,654
8,497,893
6,716,951
7,324,504
9,667,152
8,828,205
8,583,653
6,550,128
8,224,392
8,848,620
9,335,227
6,703,108
7,950,377
6,628,598
83,786
3,728,491
3,252,244
2,784,745
Commercial Vehicles
5,634,724
5,648,767
4,916,620
4,064,587
3,371,942
3,705,548
4,050,935
4,100,550
3,825,776
3,505,992
3,467,922
3,151,449
2,443,637
1,912,099
1,689,778
1,634,335
3,046,331
3,722,567
3,489,128
2,999,703
2,269,562
2,746,538
3,014,361
2,482,503
2,088,001
1,733,821
,981,519
,971,790
,802,603
,202,011
,253,672
,377,261
701,090
784,404
694,690
571,241
Total
11,985,091
12,262,737
10,897,666
9,728,790
8,810,521
9,782,997
10,874,032
11,213,687
10,924,686
11,334,775
11,652,743
10,924,781
9,224,821
6,985,595
7,942,916
8,009,841
11,479,993
12,899,202
12,702,782
11,497,596
8,986,513
10,071,042
12,681,513
11,310,708
10,671,654
8,283,949
10,205,911
10,820,410
11,137,830
7,905,119
9,204,049
8,005,859
784,876
4,512,895
3,946,934
3,355,986
Source: American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Motor Vehicle
Facts and Figures, 1996^ and Ward's Automotive Reports.
1-18
-------
Production of automobiles and other vehicles, along with production of replacement parts,
accounts for a significant portion of total U.S. consumption of major materials, including aluminum,
lead, copper, zinc, steel and iron, as shown in Table 1-2. A significant portion of these materials are
from post-consumer recycled sources, and the industry is seeking to increase the recycled content
and the recyclability of its products.
Table 1-2
MATERIAL USAGE BY THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, 1995
Material
Aluminum (thous Ibs.)
Copper and Copper Alloy
(thous Ibs.)
Cotton (480 Ib. bales)
Total Iron (tons)
Lead (metric tons)
Plastic (thous Ib.)
Rubber (Natural &
Synthetic)* (metric tons)
Total Steel** (tons)
Zinc* (tons)
Automotive
Consumption
4,926,000
7,651,000
11,292,000
3,515,000
1,088,070 e
3,054,670
2,030,002
14,623,389
1,190,000
Automotive as Percent of
Total U.S. Consumption
27.1%
10.9%
0.1%
33.5%
68.1% e
4.3% e
63.9%
15.0%
23.0%
e = estimate
NA = not available
* includes rubber classified as "tire" and "tire products" only.
** automotive consumption of steel in understated as shipments to the automotive market
from steel centers and distributors are excluded. Data also exclude imports.
NOTE: For most materials listed, automotive consumption includes materials for cars,
trucks, buses and replacement parts.
SOURCE: American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Motor Vehicle Facts and
Figures, 1996, from various sources.
The following figure, reproduced from AAMA's Motor Vehicle Facts and Figures 1996,
shows that a substantial portion of a vehicle's material content is typically recovered.
1-19
-------
MATERIALS DISPOSTION FROM RECYCLED VEHICLES
• ASR 1 i Recycled Materials
Automotive
Shredder
Residue
• Plastic
• Fluids
• Rubber
• Glass
• Other
Non-Ferrous
Metals
• Aluminun
• Copper
•Lead
• Zinc
• Magnesium
Ferrous
Metals
• Steel
• Iron
Batteries and
Fluids
• Engine Oil
• Coolant
• Refigerants
95% of vehicles retired from use each year are processed for
recycling.
Approximately 75% of a car's material content is recycled.
SOURCE: American Automobile Manufacturers Association and
U.S. Department of Energy.
Table 1-3 shows personal income of motor vehicle and equipment manufacturing employees
from 1992 through 1994 in millions of dollars and as a percent of total personal income of all
manufacturing employees. These data are calculated by AAMA based on data from the U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. The data include employees of auto, truck
and bus producers and their immediate suppliers, and show that the sector as a whole accounted for
seven percent of total U.S. manufacturing employee earnings in 1994.
Table 1-3
PERSONAL INCOME OF MOTOR VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEES
Motor Vehicle & Equipment Manufacturing Employees:
Personal Income (mill $)
All Manufacturing Employees: Personal Income (mill $)
Motor Vehicle & Equipment Manufacturing as Percent
of Total Manufacturing
1992
$43,847
$692,808
6.3%
1993
$45,470
$709,567
6.4%
1994
$52,148
$747,552
7.0%
Source: AAMA Motor Vehicle Facts and Figures 1996, from U.S. Department of Commerce data.
1-20
-------
Description of Assembly Plant Universe
Automobiles and light duty trucks were assembled at 56 plants in the United States in 1995 —
28 plants produced autos, 23 plants produced light duty trucks, one plant produced both light duty
and heavy duty trucks, and four plants produced both autos and light duty trucks. Of the 56, 47
plants were operated by domestic automakers (General Motors, Ford and Chrysler) and six were
operated by foreign-owned "transplant" companies (Toyota, Nissan, Honda (2 plants), Mitsubishi
(Diamond-Star Motors), and BMW). Another three plants were operated as joint ventures.11
In the period 1991 through 1994, six plants closed or were converted to non-assembly
operations and three plants opened. Appendix J lists plants that operated between 1991 and 1994
that were not included in the universe of 56 plants. The following shows the number of plants
operating and the total production of autos and LDTs in each year from 1991 through 1994:
Table 1-4
AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTSrNUMBER OF PLANTS
OPERATING AND PRODUCTION
Year
1991
1992
1993
1994
Number of
Plants
59
57
57
57
Production
Automobiles
5,412,048
5,348,009
6,033,386
6,768,326
LDTs
3,237,377
3,859,226
4,648,311
5,264,897
Total
8,649,425
9,207,235
10,681,697
12,033,223
Source: Part II, page II- 1 and Appendix J.
" The joint ventures are: New United Motor Mfg., Inc. (NUMMI), jointly owned by
General Motors and Toyota and producing autos at one plant in California; Subaru-Isuzu
Automotive Inc., jointly owned by Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. and Isuzu Motors LTD. and producing
autos and LDTs at one plant in Indiana; and Auto Alliance International Inc., jointly owned by Ford
and Mazda and producing autos at one plant in Michigan.
1-21
-------
Toxics Release Inventory
Description and Guidelines for Use
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) was the most extensively used data source in this
document. TRI data were compiled both for the assembly plants and for other TRI reporters located
in the same areas. This data source is accessible to the general public, is widely cited and used,
provides a multi-media perspective on the reporting facilities and covers many toxic pollutants.
The Toxics Release Inventory is mandated by the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986, which requires certain manufacturing facilities to report their
annual environmental releases (routine and accidental) of over 330 chemicals and chemical
categories. Affected facilities are those with ten or more employees that manufacture or process
more than 25,000 pounds or use more than 10,000 pounds of a TRI chemical in the calendar year.
In addition, affected facilities must report transfers of these chemicals off-site for energy
recovery, recycling, treatment, and disposal. Treatment includes transferring wastewater for
treatment at Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs). It is important to remember that off-site
transfers do not necessarily represent entry of the chemical into the environment, either in the
assembly plant community or elsewhere.
The TRI data base is constructed to allow users to sort the data by chemical, plant or
specified geographic area. The work group used this latter capability to collect data on releases from
all reporting sources within a three mile radius of each assembly plant, to help put the assembly
plant's contribution to local TRI releases in context.
The following characteristics of the TRI data should be considered when comparing data
across individual reporters and assessing trends over time:
• The data may be based on best engineering estimates, as well as on actual
measurement of releases. Sometimes, engineering estimates are the only way to
determine a release or transfer amount. Methods used to estimate releases and
transfers may differ across facilities and may change over time.
Some otherwise subject facilities need not report to the TRI if they do not meet the
various reporting thresholds. Other potential sources of TRI releases in a given area
that TRI does not cover include many other industrial, commercial and institutional
facilities such as power plants, airports, transportation companies, construction
1-22
-------
companies, laboratories, agriculture and municipal landfills.12 Federal facilities were
required to report starting in 1995% and therefore were not included in the data for
earlier years.
• The chemicals listed under TRI have changed over time, and chemical coverage was
greatly expanded for the 1995 reporting year, which this report does not include.
These changes require adjustments when assessing trends in releases and transfers,
to ensure a consistent basis over time. Changes in the coverage of chemicals reported
by assembly plants between 1991 and 1994 are discussed in Appendix D. Changes
in reporting requirements were also required by the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990,
as described in Appendix D.
• TRI reports show only total annual releases and transfers of chemicals. Information
on variations in chemical release rates over a shorter than annual timeframe is not
provided by TRI.
• The chemicals listed under the TRI exhibit varying levels and types of toxicity, and
their impacts will depend greatly on the level, duration, frequency, physical form and
route of exposure. In addition, some chemicals may present more risk when present
in one environmental medium than in another (e.g., air versus water).
• Many of the TRI chemicals reported by assembly plants are volatile organic
chemicals and are included in VOC data described below. Not all TRI chemicals are
VOCs and not all VOCs are listed as TRI chemicals. However, the two datasets
overlap, and should not be summed.
• Because the TRI data base fails to cover all sources of releases and all compounds,
considering only TRI data for a given community may mislead as to the relative
contribution of auto assembly plants and their neighboring TRI facilities to the area's
total releases.
Data reported under TSCA Section 8, which provides information on source reduction and
recycling of TRI chemicals, were not used. These data are incomplete, since reporting is not
mandatory, and inconsistent across facilities, since each facility chooses its own basis for reporting
production ratios.
12 In 1996, EPA proposed to expand the TRI reporting requirements to include selected non-
manufacturing sectors.
1-23
-------
Summary of Data
1994 Snapshot
In 1994, the largest portion of the TRI chemicals released by assembly plants were emitted
to the air (56.2 million Ibs.), of which 50.2 million Ibs. (89.4 percent of total releases) were
emissions from stacks (point source) and 6.0 million Ibs. (10.6 percent of total releases) were
fugitive emissions (from sources other than stacks). Direct discharges to surface waters represented
less than 0.1 percent of total TRI releases. There was no direct on-site disposal to land or
underground injection of TRI chemicals by assembly plants. (See Figure 1-1)
Figure 1-1
1994 TRI RELEASES FROM AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY
TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY TYPE OF RELEASE
Total Assembly Plant
Releases = 56.2 million Ibs.
Source: Part II, pages 11-18-19.
Discharge to
surface waters
Fugitive air
emissions
10.6%
Stack air
emissions
89.4%
Transfers of TRI chemicals off-site, including discharges to publicly-owned treatment works
(POTWs), were primarily for materials recycling. Transfers for recycling (38.8 million Ibs.)
accounted for 72 percent of total transfers and transfers for energy recovery (7.9 million Ibs.)
accounted for another 19 percent of total transfers. POTW and other treatment and disposal together
accounted for 9 percent of total transfers off-site. (See Figure 1-2)
1-24
-------
Figure 1-2
1994 TRI TRANSFERS FROM AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY
TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY TYPE OF TRANSFER
Total Assembly
Plant Transfers=
Sl.S million Ibs.
Recycling
71.7%
Source: Part II, pages 11-18-19.
nergy recovery 18.9%
Treatment 2.3%
POTW 3.6%
Disposal 3.5%
TRI air emissions per vehicle produced in 1994 show substantial variation across plants. (See Figure
1-3). Auto assembly plants emitted an average of 4.8 Ibs. per vehicle produced (with a range of 0.9
to 11.9 Ibs. per vehicle), and light duty truck plants emitted an average of 4.6 Ibs. per vehicle
produced (with a range of .9 to 14.1 Ibs.). Plants producing both automobiles and light duty trucks
emitted an average of 4.5 Ibs. per vehicle (with a range of 1.7 to 6.4 Ibs.) Differences in emissions
20
IB
16
14
12
S.
"10
Figure 1-3
DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY TRI AIR EMISSIONS
PER VEHICLE PRODUCED, 1994
0-2.0
2 0-4.0
4 0-6.0
6.0-8.0 8.0-10.0
Lbs./Vehicle
100-12 0
120-140+
Source: Part II, pages II-4-11.
1-25
-------
per vehicle among plants may be due to production of different sizes and configuration of vehicles
(requiring different amounts and types of paint), variations in product mix, and variations in
production technologies (e.g., painting methods), use of emission controls, and pollution prevention
efforts.
Tables 1-5 and 1-6 show the quantities of the top ten TRI chemicals released (to air or surface
waters) by assembly plants in 1994, and the top ten TRI chemicals transferred off-site by assembly
plants for POTW treatment, energy recovery, recycling, other treatment or disposal, respectively.
The top 10 chemicals or chemical groups account for 97 percent of total assembly plant releases and
89 percent of total assembly plant transfers of TRI chemicals. All but one of the top 10 chemicals
are considered volatile organic chemicals, and are therefore also included in the VOC data reported
below.
Table 1-5
TRI CHEMICALS RELEASES FROM AUTOMOBILE
AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS, 1994 (Ibs. and percent of total)
TRI Chemical
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS)
GLYCOL ETHERS
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
N-BUTYL ALCOHOL
TOLUENE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHANOL
1 .2.4-TRIMETHYL-BENZENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1.1 -TRICHLORO-ETHANE
All Others
Total-All Assembly Plant Releases
Fugitive Air
Emissions
1,652,342
616,448
519,594
182,014
655,728
224,004
373,443
221,011
668,648
482,093
371,426
5,966,751
Stack Air
Emissions
19,521,652
6,683,627
6,475,559
4,478,177
3,103,035
3,224,177
2,431,971
1,875,614
1,082,732
239,826
1,130,218
50,246,888
Water
0
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,842
9,862
Total
Releases
21,173,994
7,300,085
6,995,163
4,660,191
3,758,763
3,448,181
2,805,414
2,096,625
1,751,380
721,919
1,511,486
56,223,451
Percent of
Assembly
Plant TRI
Releases
37.7%
13.0%
12.4%
8.3%
6.7%
6.1%
5.0%
3.7%
3.1%
1.3%
2.7%
100.0%
Source: Part II, p. II-3 and Part III profiles.
1-26
-------
Table 1-6
TRI CHEMICALS TRANSFERRED FROM AUTOMOBILE
AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS, 1994 (Ibs. and percent of total)
Chemical
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS)
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
ETHYL-BENZENE
GLYCOL ETHERS
TOLUENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
MANGANESE
N-BUTYL ALCOHOL
METHANOL
1 ,2,4-TRI-METHYL-BENZENE
All Others
Total-All Assembly Plants
POTW
2,791
21,491
416
1,602,985
862
982
0
12,118
18,273
1,216
180,197
1,841,331
Energy
Recovery
4,226,933
707,051
815,571
210,415
257,719
197,074
0
269,441
373,667
196,401
613,817
7,868,089
Recycling
15,657,528
9,451,839
3,481,715
554,290
1,898,809
1,371,619
1,502,000
986,797
372,319
602,226
2,901,428
38,780,570
Treatment
141,542
15,732
3,291
66,541
95,571
23,424
0
140,506
38,936
6,237
680,002
1,211,782
Disposal
346,397
. 8,650
8,783
53,255
9,227
1,259
39,180
69,01 1
59,259
609
1,244,021
1,839,651
Total
Transfers
20,375,191
10,204,763
4,309,776
2,487,486
2,262,188
1,594,358
1,541,180
1,477,873
862,454
806,689
5,619,465
51,541,423
Percent of
Total
Assembly
Plant
Transfers
39.5%
19.8%
8.4%
4.8%
4.4%
3.1%
3.0%
2.9%
1.7%
1.6%
10.9%
100.0%
Source: Part II, p. II-3 and Part III profiles.
TRI Trends 1991-1994
TRI data reported in Parts II and HI show all TRI chemicals reported in each year, including
chemicals that were subsequently delisted. All TRI trend analyses in this section incorporate adjusted
TRI data that reflect a common list of TRI chemicals. That is, chemicals added or removed from the
required TRI reporting list since 1991 are not included in these analyses. For assembly plants, the
only relevant changes in the coverage of chemicals were for acetone and butyl benzyl phthalate,
which were deleted from the list of TRI chemicals for the 1994 reporting year. These two chemicals
have been eliminated from the data used to calculate changes between 1991 and 1994.
Total TRI releases from the 56 assembly plants operating increased by 13.7 percent between
1991 and 1994. Over the same period, vehicle production increased by 44 percent, resulting in a 21
percent decrease in total TRI releases per vehicle produced.
Total transfers of TRI chemicals from assembly plants to off-site locations increased 13
percent between 1991 and 1994 in the aggregate (45.6 million Ibs. in 1991 and 51.5 million Ibs. in
1994), after increasing in 1992 and decreasing in 1993 and 1994 (See Page II-3). With the increase
in vehicle production, transfers per vehicle declined by 21 percent between 1991 and 1994.
1-27
-------
Between 1991 and 1994, 40 plants reduced TRI releases per vehicle produced, and 11 plants
increased average TRI releases per vehicle produced. Figure 1-4 shows the distribution of percentage
changes in TRI air emissions per vehicle between 1991 and 1994.
Figure 1-4
DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN TRI AIR
EMISSIONS PER VEHICLE PRODUCED, 1991-1994
20
18
16
14
12
•10 -r
D.
-75%+ -75-50% -50-25% -25%-0 0-25% 25-50% 50-75%
V. ChanaA in TRI Air Fmiesinn Pur Vflhirlo 1991-1994
75% +
Source: Part II, pages II-l-l 1.
Table 1-7 shows the numbers of assembly plants increasing both releases and transfers, decreasing
both releases and transfers, and increasing one while decreasing the other — both in total and on a
per vehicle basis. This table shows that a substantial portion of the assembly plants (29 of 53)
reduced both TRI releases and TRI transfers on a per vehicle basis between 1991 and 1994. Increases
in transfers may be the result of more material recycling or energy recovery.
Table 1-7
NUMBER OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY
DIRECTION OF CHANGE IN TRI RELEASES AND TRANSFERS 1991-1994
Increased both releases and transfers
Decreased both releases and transfers
Increased releases, decreased transfers
Decreased releases, increased transfers
Total
Total
21
13
13
8
55
Per Vehicle
6
29
7
11
53
Source: Part II p. II-4-11.
1-28
-------
RCRA Biennial Report System (BRS)
Description and Guidelines for Use
The Biennial Report is implemented under the Resource Conservation Recovery Act of 1976,
as amended (RCRA). All non-household large-quantity generators (producers) of hazardous wastes
and hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities (TSDFs) must submit a report every
other year on the quantities of hazardous waste generated and the ways in which the wastes are
managed. The Biennial Report requirements began in 1981 and the RCRA waste minimization
program dates back to 1985. This CSI package contains BRS data from each of the assembly plants
only for the reporting years 1991 and 1993 (the latest year for which data were available to the work
group).
BRS data cannot be compared with TRI data because they measure different things. The BRS
data represent whole waste streams, which may include mixtures of water and non-hazardous
components as well as hazardous constituents. TRI data, by contrast, measure only the specific
chemicals that are contained in waste, emitted to air, or otherwise released or transferred.
The following factors should be considered when using the BRS data:
• BRS covers wastes defined as "hazardous" by federal regulation. The scope of the
federal hazardous waste definition has evolved over time, which complicates analysis
of trends in waste generation.13 However, no major changes in the hazardous waste
definition occurred between 1991 and 1993 that affected the quantities reported by
assembly plants.
• Generators who produce small quantities of hazardous waste per year (1000 kg.
(2,200 Ibs.) or less generated per month)14 need not submit reports. In addition,
wastes generated by households are excluded from the hazardous waste definition.15
13 Additional wastes were defined as hazardous by the expanded toxicity characteristic
(effective in September 1990) and by specific waste listings. EPA has also proposed a rule that may
exempt certain wastes containing very low concentrations of toxic constituents from the hazardous
wastes requirements in the future (the "Hazardous Waste Identification Rule.").
14 Lower reporting quantity limits apply for a subcategory of hazardous wastes regulated
as "acutely hazardous wastes."
15 Household and small quantity generator waste may end up in the local municipal landfill.
1-29
-------
Therefore, the BRS data base does not capture all the hazardous wastes that may be
generated or managed in a particular area.
States differ in how they define hazardous waste and how they treat recycled wastes
and small quantity generators. RCRA requires states to have programs at least as
stringent as the federal requirements, but some states go further and define additional
wastes as hazardous. In addition, states differ in whether they require reporting on
hazardous wastewaters regulated under the Clean Water Act. In general, the national
database excludes wastes reported to the BRS that are regulated only by states.
However, some variation in reporting practices across states may remain, especially
regarding wastewaters managed in exempt units. Therefore, data on quantities
generated may not be comparable for plants located in different states.
Reported wastes can vary greatly hi chemical composition, even when from the same
source. The waste code "D008," for example, refers to wastes that contain lead above
a certain concentration. The waste may be highly-dilute with low concentrations of
lead, or a sludge with much higher lead content. Distinguishing wastes by physical
form (e.g., aqueous versus non-aqueous) provides some insight into their different
characteristics, but there is no way to assess variations in concentrations directly.
The quantities of waste generated may represent continuing generation associated
with vehicle assembly or a one-time event resulting in unusual quantities of waste.
These events could include cleanup of a contaminated site or spill, or the dismantling
of a plant or its equipment, for example. The Part III Plant-Community Profiles
provide information on the source of wastes at each plant. Remediation wastes were
not included in the analysis of changes between 1991 and 1993 reported below.
Summary of Data
1993 Snapshot
As noted above, states vary in their requirements for reporting RCRA hazardous wastewaters
treated in exempt tanks and discharged under Clean Water Act provisions. Some states require that
these wastewaters be reported as hazardous wastes in the Biennial Report, while others do not
require that these wastes be included. This variation in reporting practices for these large quantity
wastes overstates differences among assembly plants in the amount of hazardous waste generated.
This section therefore distinguishes between aqueous and non-aqueous wastes, and calculates
normalized quantities (per vehicle produced) based only on non-aqueous wastes.
1-30
-------
A total of 190,199 tons of RCRA hazardous waste was reported as generated by assembly
plants in 1993. Of this total, 129,361 tons (68 percent) was aqueous waste and 61,838 tons (32
percent) was non-aqueous waste.
The following two tables illustrate the distribution of 1993 waste quantities generated by
source (e.g., cleaning/degreasing, surface preparation and finishing, and remediation derived waste)
and physical form (liquids, solids, sludges - organic and inorganic). Table 1-8 shows that surface
preparation/finishing and cleaning/degreasing account for 56 percent of all assembly plant
hazardous, non-aqueous waste and 87 percent of aqueous wastes. Similarly, two physical form
categories account for the majority of hazardous waste. Table 1-9 shows that 86 percent of
hazardous waste generated by assembly plants is liquid waste (inorganic and organic, aqueous and
non-aqueous).
Table 1-8
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED BY AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS, 1993 BY SOURCE CATEGORY
Waste Source
Surface Preparation and Finishing
Cleaning and Degreasing
Processes Other Than Surface
Preparation
Production or Service Derived
One-Time and Intermittent
Processes
Pollution Control or Waste
Treatment Processes
Remediation Derived Waste
Other Processes/Source Not
Reported
Totals - All Assembly Plants
Aqueous
Wastes
(tons)
63,040
49,083
0
388
115
15
16,721
129,361
Percent of Total
Assembly Plant
Aqueous Wastes
48.7
37.9
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
12.9
100.0
Non-Aqueous
Wastes (tons)
25,718
8,850
5,240
3,003
3,104
11
15,912
61,838
Percent of Total
Assembly Plant Non-
Aqueous Wastes
41.6
14.3
8.5
4.9
5.0
0.0
25.7
100.0
Source: Part III profiles.
1-31
-------
Table 1-9
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED BY AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS, 1993 BY PHYSICAL FORM
Physical Form
Inorganic Liquids
Organic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Sludges
Organic Sludges
Organic Solids
Lab Packs
Form Not Reported
Total - All Assembly Plants
Aqueous
Wastes
(tons)
129,361
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
129,361
Percent of Total
Assembly Plant
Aqueous Wastes
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
Non-Aqueous
Wastes
(tons)
29
34,141
12,748
2,643
1,448
1,131
9
9,689
61,838
Percent of Total
Assembly Plant Non-
Aqueous Wastes
0.0
55.2
20.6
4.3
2.3
1.8
0.0
15.7
100.0
Source: Part III profiles.
As shown in Part II (page 11-25) hazardous wastes exhibiting the toxicity characteristic for
metals accounted for the largest quantities (66 percent of the total). Of these wastes, 88 percent were
aqueous wastes either treated on-site or discharged to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) for
treatment. Another 10 percent of the toxic metal-bearing wastes were stabilized prior to disposal.
Specific solvent wastes accounted for 18 percent of the total generated ~ of which 62 percent was
treated to recover solvents and another 14 percent was burned for energy recovery or used to produce
fuels.
Most RCRA hazardous waste quantities managed in 1993 were treated on-site using aqueous
treatment methods (58 percent), treated to recover solvents (14 percent), discharged to POTWs (9
percent) or stabilized prior to disposal (7 percent). Table I-10 shows the methods used to manage
RCRA hazardous wastes generated by assembly plants in 1993.
1-32
-------
Table 1-10
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTES MANAGED BY AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY
TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS, 1993 BY MANAGEMENT METHOD
Management System Type
Aqueous Treatment
Discharge to sewer/POTW
Solvents Recovery
Metals & Other Recovery
Stabilization
Fuel Blending
Incineration
Energy Recovery
Other Treatment
Landfill Disposal
Transfer Facility
Method Not Reported
Total - AH Assembly Plants
Aqueous
Wastes (tons)
110,847
16,697
115
3
330
5
53
3
1,139
0
1
168
129,361
Percent of Total
Assembly Plant
Aqueous Wastes
85.7
12.9
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.1
100.0
Non-Aqueous
Wastes (tons)
1,231
0
26,994
142
12,294
4,483
3,220
1,965
903
2,904
185
7,517
61,838
Percent of Total
Assembly Plant Non-
Aqueous Wastes
2.0
0.0
43.7
0.2
19.9
7.2
5.2
3.2
1.5
4.7
0.3
12.2
100.0
Source: Part III profiles.
Assembly plants vary widely in the quantity of non-aqueous RCRA hazardous waste
generated per vehicle produced, as shown for 1993 in Figure 1-5. (Remediation wastes are excluded
from this calculation.) Non-aqueous waste quantities per vehicle produced ranged from 0.4 to 279.7
Ibs., with an average for all assembly plants of 12.0 Ibs. of waste per vehicle (and a average plant
generation rate of 17.8 Ibs. of waste per vehicle)16.
16 The first average is based on total assembly plant waste quantities and production. The
"average plant generation rate" is the average of individual plant waste generation rates.
1-33
-------
Figure 1-5
DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY RCRA HAZARDOUS NON-AQUEOUS WASTE GENERATED
PER VEHICLE PRODUCED, 1993
35
30-
25-
» 15
10-
0-10
10-20 20-30 30-40
Pounds per Vehicle
40-50+
Source: Part III profiles.
Hazardous Waste Changes 1991-1993
Changes in RCRA hazardous waste generation between 1991 and 1993 are affected by
periodic generation of remediation wastes as well as by changes in waste generation from production
activities. To focus on changes in production-related wastes on a consistent basis, this section
excludes remediation wastes and aqueous wastes in calculating changes between 1991 and 1993 in
total and per vehicle quantities generated.
The overall quantity of RCRA hazardous waste generated by assembly plants increased by
43 percent between 1991 and 1993. Thirty-one plants generated more RCRA hazardous waste in
1993 than in 1991, and 21 plants either generated the same amount or reduced generation.
A comparison of non-aqueous waste per vehicle produced suggests slightly different trends.
The national average increased four percent (11.4 Ibs. to 12.0 Ibs.), while the average plant
generation rate decreased 39 percent (29.2 Ibs. in 1991 to 17.8 Ibs. in 1993). Only 17 plants show
an increase in non-aqueous waste per vehicle produced, while 35 plants reduced their waste per
vehicle produced. Results normalized for production levels are shown in Figure 1-6.
1-34
-------
Figure 1-6
DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN RCRA HAZARDOUS NON-
AQUEOUS WASTE GENERATED PER VEHICLE, 1991-1993
-100-75 -75-50 -50-25 -25-0 0-25 25-50
% Change In LbsJVohicle
50-75
75-100
100+
Source: Part II p. II-4-11 and 11-20.
VOC and NOx Emissions Data
Description
The initial source reviewed for emissions data was the Aerometric Information Retrieval
System (AIRS). AIRS is a national repository for air pollution data submitted by state and local
agencies, as required under the Clean Air Act and EPA grant provisions and guidelines. The AIRS
facility subsystem includes data on emissions from individual major sources (those with the potential
to emit more than 100 tons per year of any criteria pollutant other than lead or CO, for which the
limits are 5 tons a year or 1,000 tons a year, respectively). The data represent actual emissions (as
opposed to potential or allowable).17 The facility subsystem also contains regulatory compliance and
permit tracking data. Some but not all data in AIRS are available to the public.
The AIRS data were found to be incomplete and outdated in many instances, and had to be
supplemented by requesting data from state agencies and the companies. The data reported in this
17 The criteria air pollutants are PM10, NO2, O3, CO, SO2 and lead (Pb).
1-35
-------
section are those obtained from state offices and the companies. The data represent actual or
estimated emissions, rather than allowable emissions. The methods used to calculate emissions vary.
In some cases, facilities reported emissions themselves, while in other cases state agencies calculated
emissions based on production levels reported by the facilities and estimated emission factors.
Summary of Data
Figure 1-7 shows the distribution of assembly plants by pounds of VOCs emitted per vehicle
produced in 1994. This distribution includes the 45 plants for which 1994 VOC emissions data were
available.
Figure 1-7
DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY VOC EMISSIONS PER VEHICLE PRODUCED, 1994
0-5.0
I
5.1-10.0
10.1-15.0
VOCs Ibs/vehicle
15.1-20.0
20.0+
Source: Part II p. II-1 and 11-20.
The measures used to report emissions vary from state to state. The per vehicle comparison
in Figure 1-7 includes only plants reporting volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and not other
measures such as volatile organic materials (VOMs). There may be other inconsistencies in state
reporting requirements that limit the reliability of comparisons across plants.
18
18 For example, Delaware makes adjustments for "rule effectiveness" that affect the
comparability of its data with data reported in other states.
1-36
-------
Of the 32 plants for which data are available for both 1990 and 1994, VOC or VOM
emissions increased at 18 plants and decreased at 14 plants over that time period. Figure 1-8 shows
the distribution of assembly plants by the percentage change in VOCs emitted per vehicle between
1991 and 1994. Data on VOC emissions for both 1991 and 1994 were available only for 24 plants.19
Of the 24 plants, all but eight reduced the level of VOCs emitted per vehicle between 1991 and 1994
~ with two reducing per vehicle VOC emissions by more than 50 percent.
Figure 1-8
DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN VOC EMISSIONS PER
VEHICLE PRODUCED, 1991-1994
-100-75
-75-50
-50-25
-25-0 0-25
% Change
25-50
50-75
75-100
Source: Part II p. II-4-11 and 11-20.
Similarly, for the 30 plants for which data are available for both 1990 and 1994, NOx or N02
emissions increased at 19 plants and decreased at 11 plants over that time period. On a per vehicle
basis, NOx or NO2 emissions increased at 9 plants and decreased at 15 plants between 1991 and
1994. (Lack of 1991 NOx/NO2 data made this comparison possible only for 24 plants.)
19 Data for an additional plant were excluded from this comparison because the plant was
not fully-operational in 1991.
1-37
-------
Table I-11 compares 1994 VOC emissions for plants in locations with different ozone
attainment status in 1994. The average emissions per plant and per vehicle produced show relatively
small variations across attainment status categories, when compared with the substantial variation
in these averages within the attainment status categories.
Table 1-11
VOC EMISSIONS FROM AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS
BY OZONE ATTAINMENT STATUS, 1994
No. Assembly Plants
No. with 1994 VOC
Data Available
Total 1994 VOC
Emissions (Ibs.)
Average 1994 VOC
Emissions per Plant
(Ibs.)
Average 1994 VOC
Emissions per Vehicle
Produced (Ibs.)
Attainment
16
10
24,360,000
2,436,000
(835,160-
5,214,000)
13.8
(4.0-42.0)
Maintenance/
Transitional
3
3
8,598,488
2,866,162
(2,122,000-
3,479,218)
16.3
(12.9-20.7)
Nonattainment
(marginal/
moderate)
28
20
51,829,300
2,591,465
(16,122-
4,454,164)
10.8
(0.5-21.7)
Nonattainment
(serious/severe)
9
8
17,198,800
2,149,850
(1,407,860-
3,382,000)
11.5
(8.8-16.9)
TOTAL
56
41
Source: Part II p. 11-20 and 11-22.
Releases to Surface Waters and POTWs
Data from the Permit Compliance System (PCS) suggest that 24 of the 56 plants have or have
had NPDES permits for discharges to surface waters. The companies noted that the majority of these
permits were for stormwater discharges, rather than for discharge of process wastewaters. In some
cases, these permits may no longer be in effect, since some PCS records show permit expiration
dates that have passed. Alternatively, permit renewals may be pending. The PCS database does not
report the status of each permit. TRI data reported in Part II suggest that there has been a decrease
between 1991 and 1994 in discharges to surface waters, at least of the chemicals reported in TRI.
In 1991,16 assembly plants discharged 53,566 Ibs. of TRI chemicals to surface waters. In 1994, six
plants reported discharges of 9,862 Ibs. of TRI chemicals to surface waters.
1-38
-------
Ambient Air Quality Attainment Status
Of the 56 plants, 40 were located in areas that were not hi attainment with the National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone as of 1994. (See Page 11-10.) Of these, two were
in a serious nonattainment area, seven were in severe nonattainment areas, and 25 were in moderate
nonattainment areas. Another three plants were hi marginal areas, two were in transitional areas, and
one plant was in a maintenance area. Sixteen assembly plants are located in areas that were in
attainment with the ozone standard or were not classified.20 Of the 39 plants located hi nonattainment
areas hi 1994,20 are located hi areas that had been upgraded to an attainment classification for ozone
by 1996, however.
Community Economic and Demographic Data
Description
The work group obtained community economic and demographic data from U.S. Census
sources. Data were collected at the county levels, for census blocks, and for fixed areas around each
plant (e.g., a circle of 3-mile radius centered on the plant).
Counties are the most readily-available reporting unit, but they vary greatly in size and shape.
Depending on the size of the county and the plant's location within it (in its center or at a county
boundary), county-level data will be more or less reliable in representing the characteristics of the
area around a plant.21
Area-wide averages for demographic characteristics at any level of reporting may be
misleading, depending on the specific location of a plant. For example, a plant located next to a
major airport in a downtown area may appear to be located in a rural area based solely on the
population density of a three-mile radius circle around the plant. This document, therefore, uses a
variety of data types in combination with maps to provide a more reliable picture of assembly plant
community characteristics.
20 See Appendix H for definitions of the attainment categories.
21 Counties where assembly plants are located range from 103 to 1,184 sq. miles in area.
(Baltimore MD is an independent city covering 81. sq. miles. Norfolk VA is an independent city
covering 54 sq. miles.) As a basis for comparison, a one-mile radius circle around the plant
encompasses a little more than three square miles, and a three-mile radius circle includes 28 square
miles.
1-39
-------
Caution should be used when interpreting the demographic and economic data. In particular,
data should not be assumed to reflect direct cause-and-effect relationships. Employment statistics,
community resources and general social well-being in a local area may be influenced by a plant's
operations and economic performance, but they reflect a host of other economic and political forces
as well, both national and local.
Summary of Data
Fifty-one of the 56 plants are located in Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs).22 At the
county level, average 1994 county population densities (population per square mile) for the 56 plants
range from 81 (for the Honda plant in Marysville OH) to 5,436 (Chicago, location of a Ford plant).
Average 1990 population densities (population per square mile) within a three mile radius of the
plant range from 35 (for the Honda plant in Marysville OH) to 35,036 (for a General Motors plant
in Lansing MI). (See Figure 1-9)
Assembly plants represent a significant portion of local manufacturing employment in some
assembly plant communities. Of the 40 counties where assembly plants are located, the plants
accounted for ten percent or more of total county manufacturing employment in 26 of the counties,
and for 25 percent or more in 14 of the counties.23 The contribution of individual assembly plants
to local manufacturing employment varies widely, from less than one percent (for Ford's plant in
Chicago) to approximately 99 percent (for Toyota in Georgetown KY), reflecting the varied sizes
and economic characteristics of assembly plant communities.
Most assembly plant communities enjoy lower civilian unemployment rates than the nation
as a whole: 39 of the 56 assembly plants are located in counties with unemployment less than the
1994 national average of 6.1 percent.
22 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) (formerly known as SMS As) are geographic units
defined by the Census Bureau to include large Central Cities together with their surrounding
"socially and economically integrated" county or counties. MSAs include whole counties and may
cross state boundaries.
23 Employment data were not available for three assembly plants.
1-40
-------
Figure 1-9
DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK
ASSEMBLY PLANTS BY POPULATION DENSITY IN 3-MILE RADIUS
0-500 501-1.000 1,001-2,000 2,001-3.000 3,001-4,000 4,001-5,000 5,001-6,000 6,001-7,000 7,001-8,000
1990 Population / Square Mile
8,000+
Source: Part II p. 11-32.
Considering just the three-mile area surrounding the plants (based on 1990 Census data):
• The 3-mile area surrounding 31 assembly plants had minority population percentages
lower than the average for their state, and the areas surrounding 35 plants had
minority population percentages lower than the national average of 19.7 percent.
• The 3-mile area surrounding 39 assembly plants had percentages of residents living
below the poverty line that were lower than the average poverty rate for their state,
and the areas around 37 plants had poverty rates below the national average of 20
percent.
• The 3-mile areas surrounding 33 assembly plants had high school completion rates
higher than the average completion rate in their state, and 32 had high school
completion rates higher than the national average of 25 percent.
Data on other demographic characteristics of assembly plant communities were collected only at the
county level. The county-level data show that:
• Thirty-one assembly plants are in counties that had a percentage of their population
under the age of five that was equal to or less than the 1990 national average, and 25
1-41
-------
assembly plants are located in counties with higher proportions of their population
under age five than the 1990 national average.
Forty assembly plants are in counties that had an elderly percentage (over 75 years
old) equal to or lower than the 1990 national average, and 16 assembly plants are in
counties that had a higher-than-average elderly percent.
Median household income in 1989 exceeded the national average in 24 of the
counties where assembly plants are located and was below the national average in 16
of the assembly plant counties.
1-42
-------
Part II:
Industry-Wide Data
July 15, 1997
-------
U.S. AUTO AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS
7/15/97
1
4
3
4
t
6
7
8
c
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont
OE, Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA. Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL. Belvidere
IL. Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing (C)
Ml, Lansing (M)
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN. St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY. N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH. Marysville
OH. Moraine
OH. #1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
• 1995 Automotive News. Market Data Book;
data for Chrysler provided by Chrylser
TYPE
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Truck
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Truck
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
PRODUCT NAMES
Toyota Tacoma pickup, Geo Prizm, Toyota Corolla
Dodge Intrepid, Spirit, Chrysler Lebaron, Concorde, Plymouth Acclaim
Chevrolet Corsica, Beretta
Olds Cutlass Supreme
Ford Taurus. Mercury Sable
Dodge Neon, Plymouth Neon
Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable
Avenger, Galant, Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser
Chevrolet C/K pickup, GMC Sierra
Honda Passport, Rodeo, Subaru Legacy, Isuzu pickup
Pontiac Grand Prix, Olds Cutlass Supreme
Chevrolet Corvette
Avalon, Camry
Ford F series pickup/heavy trucks
Ford Explorer, Ranger, Mazda Navajo
Chev S-10, GMC Sonoma pickup
GMC Safari. Astro
Ford Mustang
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Chevrolet Sportvan, GMC Rally Van, Chevrolet P model, GMC P model
Cadillac Eldorado & Seville, Olds Toronado
Mazda MX6, 626, Ford Probe
Chev Sportvan. GMC Rally
Buick LeSabre. Park Avenue, Olds 88
Buick Riviera. Olds Aurora. Olds 88, 98. Pontiac Bonneville
Olds Achieva, Pontiac Grand Am, Buick Skylark
Pontiac Grand Am, Olds Achieva
Chev S Pickup. GMC OK Pickup
Chrysler Cirrus. Dodge Stratus, Shadow, Plymouth Sundance
Dodge Dakota, Dodge full size pickup
Ford Escort
F-Series pickup. Bronco
LJncolon Continental, Mark VIII, TownCar
Ranger Pickup
Ford Tempo, Ford Contour, Mercury Mystique, Topaz
Dodge Gr. Caravan & C/V, Chrys. Town&Ctry, Plym. Gr. Voyager
Ford Aerostar
Buick Park Avenue (van in 1995)
Ford Ranger, Mazda B series pickup
Chev S pickup. Chev Blazer, GMC S pickup, GMC Jimmy
Lumina APV, Pontiac Trans Sport, Olds Silhouette
Mercury Villager, Nissan Quest Van
Honda Civic
Ford Thunderbird, Club Wagon, Econline Vans, Mercury Cougar
Chevrolet Cavalier. Pontiac Sunbird
Honda Accord
Chev. Blazer, GMC Jimmy, Olds Bravada. Chev. S postal
Jeep Cherokee
Dodge Dakota, Jeep Wranger, Cherokee
Buick Century. Olds Cutlass Ciera
BMW 3 series
Altima, 200 SX. Pickup, Sentra
Saturn Coupe, Sedan & Wagon
Chev Caprice, Buick RoadMaster, Cadillac Fleetwood
F Series Pickup
GMC C/K pickup, Kodiak, Yukon, Jimmy, Suburban, Chev. Kodiak, Tahoe, Isuzu W-4
" American Automobile Manufacturers Association
*" Included with Toledo #1 plant production.
1994 PRODUCTION*
363.083
220.947
230.925
124.395
275,222
242,806
277,770
168.726
228.728
154.801
138,120
25,390
284,765
128.000
371.288
206.400
216,036
199.048
262.955
32.863
205,578
246,991
144,541
268,784
233.227
212,250
206,959
352,768
84.874
285.536
312.191
200,312
180,587
208,325
413,564
291,539
215,193
Not Operating
160,714
159.051
136.522
153.786
138,119
456.442
232.362
360,591
130,239
303,957
141,855
268,900
429
444.608
280.002
173.923
181.840
237.925
7 Data not available
1994 EMPLOYMENT**
4.250
3,726
3,104
2,713
2,696
4.063
2.773
3.200
2,830
1,970
. 3.435
1.051
6,000
3,237
3,682
2,793
3,836
2,245
4,384
NA
5,083
3,800
5,500
12.699
5,557
7,790
NA
8,040
3,360
. 4,218
3,781
2.083
3,858
2,063
4,642
5,874
2,393
3,972
1,704
2,975
2.521
3,440
1,800
4,056
8,817
5,300
3,627
5,410
™
4,707
530(proj)
5.900
7.871
4,193
1,802
4,982
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist
11-1
-------
TRENDS IN TOTAL TRI RELEASES AND TRANSFERS BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
7/15/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors Corp.
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysvllle)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
TOTAL
STATE. CITY
CA. Fremont,
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doravllle
GA. Hapevllle
IL, BeMdere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY. Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY. Louisville
LA. Shreveport
MD. Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Lansing
Ml, Pontlac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
M|, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixorn
MN, St. Paul
MO. Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St Louis
MO, WentzvWe
NJ. Edison
NJ. Linden
NY. N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH. Lorain
OH. Lordstown
OH. Marysvllle
OH. Moraine
OH. #1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC.Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring HID
TX. Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesvllle
RELEASES OF TRI CHEMICALS (Ibs.)'
1991
746.325
670,735
628,653
1.029.814
990,581
502.173
1.622.199
284.771
1.311.621
639,365
956,005
301.260
1.208.685
227,893
1,866,990
1,489,720
903,468
689.187
5.188
121.996
1.060.685
1.743.768
593.910
619.455
1.922.642
338.483
784.010
1,311.604
437.898
593,523
1.201.788
577.224
755.305
828.802
1.726,251
1.573,699
1.660.230
1.202.670
351.956
69.210
493.050
605,529
658,880
1,082.450
1.159,159
4,036,515
1.780.968
770,567
1
1.272.904
-
2.500.208
1,036,399
1.334,715
545.588
251,345
53,078,020
1992
737,725
748,374
674.821
499,384
1,176,174
567.497
1.570,611
181.557
1.145.210
745.790
1.165.605
202.042
1,065,915
291,060
1,524,519
1.645,585
704.464
539.270
717.708
107.755
1.219.391
1,459,462
296.603
880,939
1.851,129
426,387
1,258.000
1,397,700
319,017
595,445
384,154
954,457
948,531
759.451
2.871.461
1,072.129
1,929.488
1.108.205
414.865
0
435.105
677,612
565,640
663.054
761,749
3,593.672
1.555.825
591.052
32
1.052.743
-
2.830.837
859.676
1,150,055
430,629
798,739
52,320,480
1993
563,726
931.759
826.221
820.188
1,157.484
206.000
1,214.565
490.859
1.416,600
632.720
652.360
265.985
932,500
680,193
1,602,429
898,225
819.576
951.344
591.541
36.136
1.633.125
3.009,116
906.540
822,902
1,131,503
368,388
1.308,463
1.523,625
438,587
808,791
548,057
. 1.733,637
1,191,665
817,642
2.689,968
1.033,910
1,820.840
871.844
624.239
190,085
488,250
394.472
467.920
921.450
468,541
3,438.305
. 1,693.900
904.095
2.561
1,137,126
-
2,519.315
753.815
1.149.395
658,216
1.042,839
95/423,538
Includes non-point source (fugitive) air releases, point source (stack) air releases and water discharges. No on-slte releas
" Includes discharges to POTW and transfers to off-site energy recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal.
Not applicable I
1994
601,383
652,146
1.285.570
1,019.939
1,149.031
361.426
1,229,518
372.894
1.088.600
992.040
963,570
. 148,229
1.022.555
538,194
1,361,095
1,059,295
679,046
1.323,912
464.109
31.077
2.452.875
2.046.534
2.043.050
699.629
" 1.178.513
486.722
1.144,409
1.076.520
142.571
1,072.865
968,999
2,142,449
1,238,158
729,751
2.337.617
1.066.540
2,719,951
71.540
776.943
394.264
561,650
998.984
491,710
1.430,765
213.040
2.340.226
. 526.146
1,354,112
1.242
1.170.980
-
2.428.785
1.072.482
1.081,455
675.648
744.497
56.223,451
es to land or undergro
TRANSFERS OF TRI CHEMICALS (Ibs)"
1991
968.807
477.137
939,974
874.754
582.960
556.375
756.516
25.521
1,296.770
1.404.655
326,415
390.231
4,229,175
147,226
1.637.872
696.743
539,948
716,210
80,359
43,660
447.115
754,027
914,008
152,600
1,008,647
277.459
397.670
1,186,791
393,035
1,346.944
846.609
386.605
1.853,112
796.669
1,429.191
549.684
1.050,690
692,660
428.830
589.990
1,116.043
380.261
1.312,650
734,701
1,833,819
3,238.315
2,506.550
319,206
0
1,445,025
1.335,226
1,674.294
875.775
203,860
783.916
49,951,685
und Injection were repor
1992
1.125.984
719.181
831,582
795.017
734.149
881.557
1.125.662
2.039.580
1.538,035
406,240
155.850
194,381
2.554,905
127.233
1,664.445
659,730
512.211
625.075
700,715
26.749
778.991
661.263
356.692
412.343
380.830
283.655
449.956
1.684.210
545.013
1.280.294
798,699
359,847
1.018.518
1.042.553
2.812.359
686.591
1.326.160
374.920
652.003
2,609
946,200
544,835
1,269,155
741,240
966,635
4.003.160
2,428,750
602.857
42
1.560.282
1.680,020
19,525,968
700.780
158.10B
1.320,591
69,774,392
ted by assembly plants.
1993
1.163,126
1,008.194
1.575,734
815,659
1.122.910
251.463
1.065,334
1,892.400
1.081.705
1.037.670
447.760
192.760
2.135.150
845.222
1.829.414
617.065
1.280.883
1,308,468
911,034
89.313
841.513
198.869
339.630
458.044
365.541
251.640
298,192
1.963,515
579,738
1.020,758
866,525
906,320
922,390
1,196,143
2.539.260
376.456
1.498.108
298.500
993,931
220,339
917.750
720.693
687.921
843.512
502,650
2,157,685
2,849,650
427.288
618
1,861,698
-
598,089
1.350.059
717.415
620.481
1.580.526
52.144,729
1994
1.283.587
831.879
1,210,152
1.072.237
1,716,549
92.853
1.007.517
1.910.125
1.383.205
893,490
199,215
134.394
2,930,080
1,446,460
1.731.105
402.070
387.856
1.374.128
821.291
60,321
626.445
655,749
533.648
411.346
197.514
53.441
136.316
1,135,255
359.176
1,337.860
926.081
1.444.687
1.172.166
1.347.000
3.167,567
561.362
1.440,910
57,860
1.083.980
202.493
637.550
1,446,807
719,815
1,084,952
303,578
1,954,708
646,380
414.426
582
1.165.006
0
805.287
941.002
588.875
1,613.384
1.499,941
51,541,423
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
SO
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-2
-------
1994 TRI CHEMICAL RELEASES AND TRANSFERS BY CHEMICAL:
TOTAL FOR ALL ASSEMBLY PLANTS (Ibs.)
7/15/97
Chemical Nama
1 . 1 . 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.2.4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1.4-DIOXANE
2-ETHOXYETHANOL
4.4'-ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL
ALUMINUM (FUME OR DUST)
ALUMINUM OXIDE (FIBROUS FORM)
AMMONIA
ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS
BARIUM COMPOUNDS
BENZENE
BENZOYL PEROXIDE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) ADIPATE
BUTYL ACRYLATE
CHLORINE
CHROMIUM
CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS
COPPER
COPPER COMPOUNDS
CUMENE
CYCLOHEXANE
DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DICHLORODIFLUOROM ETHANE
DICHLOROM ETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
FORMALDEHYDE
GLYCOL ETHERS
HYDROCHLORIC ACID
LEAD
LEAD COMPOUNDS
MANGANESE
MANGANESE COMPOUNDS
METHANOL
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
METHYLENEBIS(PHENYLISOCYANATE)
N-BUTYL ALCOHOL
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
NICKEL COMPOUNDS
NITRIC ACID
PHOSPHORIC ACID
PHOSPHORUS (YELLOW OR WHITE)
PROPYLENE
STYRENE
SULFURIC ACID
TERT-BUTYL ALCOHOL
TOLUENE
UNKNOWN
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS)
ZINC COMPOUNDS
TOTAL
Air Fugitive
(Non-Point Source)
Emissions
482.093
221.011
3.603
5.900
•. 0
0
611
26
0
2.082
38,074
0
250
20
755
0
37
3,956
763
12.478
1,561
0
12.760
46.773
224,004
78,054
5,345
616,448
21,486
14
542
* 0
3.782
373,443
668,648
519.594
26,000
21.796
255
182,014
801
0
477
2,330
2.822
0
1,451
33,955
2,402
400
655.728
1
1,652,342
39,661
5,968,751
Air Stack
(Point Source)
Emissions
239.826
1,875.614
250
6.200
0
0
0
0
0
2.698
53.851
0
27,475
47
750
250
151
3,225
2
27.288
1,515
0
0
43,500
3.224,177
133,129
63,398
6,683,627
574,398
262
280
251
396
2,431.971
1.082,982
6,475.559
23.000
30.212
99
4,478.177
10,588
250
9
1,040
4,350
0
10
120,250
26
0
3,103.035
0
19.521.652
1,070
50,248.83*
Discharges
to Surface
Water
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
sot
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
5
0
0
10
0
8,264
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
, 0
0
0
0
0
0
1,044
9,882
TOTAL
RELEASES*
721.919
2.096.625
4,053
12,100
0
0
611
28
0
4.789
91,925
0
27,725
67
1,505
751
188
7.188
765
39.767
3.076
0
12,760
90.273
3.448.181
211,183
68.743
7,300.085
595.884
276
832
251
4.183
2,805,414
1,751,630
6.995,163
49,000
60,272
354
4,660,191
11,389
250
486
3,370
7.172
0
1,461
154,205
2,428
400
3,758,763
1
21.173.994
41.775
56,223,451
Discharges to
POTW
252
1.216
0
0
0
0
163
0
1
5.313
46
0
0
0
3.100
17
1.095
141
1.018
0
5
0
0
1.807
416
93.482
0
1,602.985
250
66
6.217
0
17.693
18.273
982
21,491
0
0
0
12,118
21
0
13.857
250
0
0
0
0
250
0
862
540
2,791
34.593
1,841.331
Off -Site
Transfers
486.004
808.080
7,130
8,600
434
0
183
0
1,094
118,857
6,195
260
3,460
4,305
3,350
472.140
54,485
557.602
67.919
37.294
1.061
4,100
0
148,175
4,300,993
650,066
4,377
2,434,231
32,682
144.151
159,307
1,502,000
598.387
803.195
1,593,099
10.196.113
0
4.123
18.692
1,408,862
287
426,200
79.619
300
17.700
0
0
564
500
0
2.252.961
540
20.028.794
255.521
49,701,772
TOTAL
TANSFERS"
488.004
806.689
7,130
8,600
434
6,900
13.785
0
1.104
257.300
6.225
260
3,460
4.305
3.350
481.000
79.102
611,704
69.750
37,294
1.071
6.020
0
148.175
4.309.776
705,436
4.378
2.487.488
32,862
150,706
264.412
1,541.180
741.669
862,454
1.594,358
10,204,763
0
4,128
18,692
1.477.873
287
429.908
182,224
300
74,620
250
0
815
500
0
2,262,188
540
20,375,191
774,987
51,541.423
Data sources used were not always complete or current
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
n-3
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15/97
YEAR NAME
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
'1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
NUMMI
NUMMI
NUMMI .
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond-Star
Diamond-Star
Diamond-Star
Diamond-Star
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
Subaru-lsuzu
Subaru-lsuzu
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
STATE, CITY
CA-Fremont
CA-Fremont
CA-Fremont
CA-Fremont
DE-Newark
DE-Newark
DE-Newark
DE-Newark
DE-Wilmington
DE-Wilmington
DE-Wilmington
DE-Wilmington
GA-Doraville
GA-Doraville
GA-Doraville
GA-Doraville
GA-Hapeville
GA-Hapeville
GA-Hapeville
GA-Hapeville
IL-Belvidere
IL-Belvidere
IL-Belvidere .
IL-Belvidere
IL-Chicago
IL-Chicago
IL-Chicago
IL-Chicago
IL-Normal
IL-Normal
IL-Normal
IL-Normal
IN-Fort Wayne
IN-Fort Wayne
IN-Fort Wayne
IN-Fort Wayne
IN-Lafayette
IN-Lafayette
IN-Lafayette
IN-Lafayette
KS-Kansas City
KS-Kansas City
KS-Kansas City
KS-Kansas City
KY-Bowling Green
KY-Bowling Green
KY-Bowling Green
KY-Bowling Green
KY-Georgetown
KY-Georgetown
KY-Georgetown
KY-Georgetown
KY-Louisville
KY-Louisville
KY-Louisville
KY-Louisville
KY-Louisville
KY-Louisville
KY-Louisville
KY-Louisville
FUGITIVE STACK RELEASES TO
TYPE OF AIR AIR SURFACE TOTAL TRI
PLANT PRODUCTION EMISSIONS EMISSIONS WATER RELEASES*
Both
Both
Both
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
•Both
Both
Both
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Trucks
Trucks
Trucks
Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
209,169
256,180
321,404
363,083
173,265
193,826
206,545
220,947
171,933
187,441
202,654
230,925
105,151
76,855
101,073
124,395
210,715
275,232
279,018
275.222
178,087
155,107
56,601
242,806 " *
218,328
275.920
286.962
277.770
153,936
139,783
136,035
168.726
173,908
185,938
229,654
228,728
116,297
124,020
124,004
154,801
114,718
110,465
119,883
138,120
21,082
20,839
22,578
25.390
187,726
240,382
234,060
284,765
33,298
45,542
64,848
128.000
393,762
380,645
415,674
371,288
87,840
109,261
144,660
105,316
92,336
140,914
120,747
143,751
107,495
108.099
232,181
18,371
154,943
76,966
103,142
106,687
215,069
163,033
168,713
46.942
104.949
131,654
70.465
105,089
49,520
53,899
51,643
75,820
2,942
117,134
360,642
368.529
139,091
148,040
186,000
140,500
28,925
9,025
10,215
10,395
23,755
30,600
18,855
11,070
6,497
3,221
6,434
5,863
30,015
27,065
22,900
20.600
52,372
45,360
33.400
117,322
40,213
49,360
70,840
129,581
658,460
628,454
419,050
496.067
578,399
607,460
811,012
508,395
521,158
566,722
594,040
1.267.199
874,871
422.418
717.046
913,252
775,512
1,013,141
988,771
1,102,089
396,864
435,843
135,535
256,337
1,572.679
1,516,712
1,162,922
1,153,698
281,829
64,423
130,217
4.365
1,172,530
997,170
1,230,600
948.100
610,440
736,765
622,505
981,645
932,250
1,135,005
833,255
952.250
294,763
198,821
259,551
142,366
1,176,670
1,036,850
907,600
1,001,455
175,521
245,700
646,793
418,872
1,826,777
1,475,159
1,531,589
1,231,514
25
10
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
360
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
250
0
0
0
0
2,000
2,000
2,000
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
746,325
737,725
563.726
601,383
670,735
748,374
931,759
652.146
628,653
674,821
826.221
1.285.570
1,029,814
499,384
820,188
1.019,939
990,581
1,176,174
1,157,484
1,149.031
502,173
567,497
206,000
361,426
1,622,199
1,570,611
1,214,565
1,229.518
284,771
181,557
490,859
372,894
1,311,621
1,145,210
1,416,600
1,088,600
639,365
745,790
632,720
992,040
956,005
1,165,605
652,360
963,570
301,260
202,042
265.985
148,229
1,208.685
1.065.915
932,500
1,022,555
227,893
291,060
680,193
536,194
1,866,990
1,524,519
1,602,429
1,361,095
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-4
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15/97
DISCHARGE
OFF-SITE
ENERGY
OFF-SITE OFF-SITE
TOPOTW RECOVERY RECYCLING TREATMENT
63,490
34,514
1,798
1,544
60,995
13,516
172,290
182,282
0
0
0
0
100,626
64,081
46,500
52,903
4,851
5,709
8,040
27,367
221,020
230,652
54.165
3,091
103.754
98,040
104,790
62.960
0
0
0
0
40,020
19,150
15.250
20,750
5
40
1.040
1,040
255
250
250
250
0
337
121
353
2,255
10.255
2,505
1,755
52,145
17.930
34,800
80,303
301,321
142.593
134,954
115,320
331,495
144,450
28,456
12,326
400,420
662.000
73,266
31,564
0
0
0
0
429,745
431,761
35,096
406,365
7,234
9,639
0
11,321
313,000
469,629
146,014
44,032
4,140
77,200
9,020
6.940
0
0
0
0
0
0
24,650
49,750
1,386,400
390,100
138,780
136,850
306,600
148,000
440,750
188,500 '
0
0
0
0
43,915
59,175
124,110
141,660
92,790
106.413
282,142
166,897
20,800
0
103,070
33,970
541,200
908,600
1,092,400
1,224,150
0
0
678,685
567,964
886,368
769,183
1,205,934
1,033,516
327,010
288,363
692,843
555,917
522,167
653,700
990,020
1,537,430
0
169,359
48.718
9,988
597,179
910,160
911,247
914.600
25,521
2,039,580
1,892,400
1,828,258
797,000
1,063,000
705,800
777,550
12,800
9,500
870,005
684,000
0
250
250
505
0
0
0
0
4.121,200
2,426,800
1,928,150
2,687,015
0
0
520,000
1,169,000
1,252,540
1,484,930
1,527,280
1,552.690
12
0
1,250
2,300
15,722
14,510
27,877
22,300
53,606
62,399
343.345
174,079
17,373
10,812
41,220
57,052
13,008
23,011
34,420
85,000
4,351
1,228
1.346
15,478
5,543
2,282
77
17
0
0
0
81,867
17,374
61,270
4,300
12,750
5,450
6,600
27,840
71,600
16,860
3,350
1,750
1,260
390.231
188,976
192,639
129,197
60.540
55,405
72,485
97,890
411
690
4,980
1,610
30,001
0
0
0
OFF-SITE
TOTAL TOTAL
TRI AIR TRI
TOTAL EMISSIONS TRANSFERS
DISPOSAL TRANSFERS (Ibs/vehlcle) (Ibs/vehlcle)
32,610
38,420
39.222
43,267
0
29,155
56,076
27,769
0
0
26,455
2,557
0
0
0
0
35,700
42,090
90,430
55,431
16,004
10.689
4,220
20.264
45,900
37,980
40,200
23,000
0
0
0
0
442,376
394,615
331,705
522,405
0
0
5
0
2.700
4,000
4,760
8,700
0
5,068
0
4,844
1,265
3,270
7,900
1,760
1,880
2,200
3,300
28,650
33,210
36,922
64,110
29,125
968,807
1.125.984
1,163,126
1,283,587
477,137
719,181
1.008,194
831,879
939,974
831,582
1,575,734
1,210,152
874,754
795,017
815,659
1,072,237
582,960
734,149
1,122,910
1,716,549
556,375
881,557
251,463
92,853
756,516
1,125,662
1,065,334
1.007,517
25,521
2.039,580
1,692,400
1,910,125
1,296,770
1,538,035
1,081,705
1,383,205
1,404,655
406,240
1,037,670
893,490
326,415
155,850
447,760
199,215
390,231
194,381
192,760
134.394
4,229,175
2,554,905
2,135,150
2,930,080
147,226
127,233
845,222
1,446,460
1.637,872
1,664,445
1,829,414
1,731,105
3.6
2.9
1.8
1.7
3.9
3.9
4.5
3.0
3.7
3.6
4.1
5.6
9.8
6.5
8.1
8.2
4.7
4.3
4.1
4.2
2.8
3.7
3.6
1.5
7.4
5.7
4.2
4.4
1.8
1.3
3.6
2.2
7.5
6.2
6.2
4.8
5.5
6.0
5.1
6.4
8.3
10.6
7.1
7.0
14.3
9.7
11.8
5.8
6.4
4.4
4.0
3.6
6.8
6.4
10.5
4.2
4.7
4.0
3.9
3.7
4.6
4.4
3.6
3.5
2.8
3.7
4.9
3.8
5.5
4.4
7.8
5.2
8.3
10.3
6.1
8.6
2.8
2.7
4.0
6.2
3.1
5.7
4.4
0.4
3.5
4.1
3.7
3.6
0.2
14.6
13.9
11.3
7.5
8.3
4.7
6.0
12.1
3.3
8.4
5.8
2.8
1.4
3.7
1.4
18.5
9.3
8.5
5.3
22.5
10.6
9.1
10.3
4.4
2.8
13.0
11.3
4.2
4.4
4.4
4.7
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-5
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15/97
YEAR NAME
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
28
28
28
28
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
30
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992 - •
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intt.
Auto Alliance Intl.
Auto Alliance Intt.
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
STATE, CrTY
LA-Shreveport
LA-Shreveport
LA-Shreveport
LA-Shreveport
MD-Baltimore
MD-Baltimore
MD-Baltimore
MD-Baltimore
MI-Dearbom
MI-Deartom
MI-Dearbom
MI-Dearbom
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Detroit
Mi-Flat Rock
•Mi-Flat Rock
Mi-Flat Rock
Mi-Flat Rock
Mi-Flint
Mi-Flint
Mi-Flint
Mi-Flint
Mi-Flint
Mi-Flint
Mi-Flint
Mi-Flint
Mi-Lake Orion
Mi-Lake Orion
Mi-Lake Orion
Mi-Orion
Mi-Lansing
Mi-Lansing
Mi-Lansing
Mi-Lansing
Mi-Lansing
Mi-Lansing
Mi-Lansing
Mi-Lansing
Ml-Pontiac
Ml-Pontiac
Ml-Pontiac
Ml-Pontiac
Ml-Steriing Hts.
Mi-Sterling Hts.
Ml-Steriing Hts.
Ml-Steriing Hts.
Mi-Warren
Mi-Warren
Mi-Warren
Mi-Warren
FUGITIVE STACK RELEASES TO
TYPE OF AIR AIR SURFACE TOTAL TRI
PLANT PRODUCTION EMISSIONS EMISSIONS WATER RELEASES*
LL Trucks
LL Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
LL Trucks
LL Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt. Trucks
LL Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
154,765
166,999
114,312
206,400
148,446
190,849
200,201
216,036
81,558
88,568
106,238
199,048
500
122,961
245.321
262,955
20,645
24,772
29,719
32.863
62,210
94,068
71,114
205,578
165,314
168,859
219,096
246,991
45,098
18,203
117,116
144,541
178,762
157,947
221,743
268,784
235,585
149,232
142,886
233,227
135,173
60,351
169,889
212,250
107,498
87,668
165,418
206,959
261,072
288,617
330,952
352,768
107,346
173,147
229,557
84,874
177,336
208,099
172,972
285,536
37,139
31,115
9,485
605
84,212
95,342
91,639
88,462
78,278
33,417
64,369
33,548
320
156,641
94,158
112,062
121,996
255
1,000
1,753
23,855
44,162
27,063
37,567
153,778
173,038
254,435
262.895
154,350
47,890
128,120
181,642
258,850
313,673
441.102
282,914
330,542
317,019
177,624
154,412
63,625
136,390
83,710
67,100
224,550
225,800
205,460
188.360
15,203
200,780
74,010
51.020
56.142
80,427
55,678
28,782
102,787
111,902
119,017
178,783
1,450.650
1,614,470
888,740
1,058,690
819,026
608,922
727,707
590,114
610,909
505.853
886,975
1,290.364
4,868
561,067
497,383
352,047
0
107,500
35,136
29,324
1,036,830
1,175,229
1,606,062
2,415,308
• 1,587,556
1.283,340
2,753,559
1,775,345
439,136
248,565
775,915
1,861,142
360,105
567,266
381,800
416,915
1,592,100
1,534,110
953,879
1,024,101
274,800
289,900
284,500
419.540
559,460
1,030,200
1,103.000
956.049
1,296,401
1,196.920
1,449,615
1.025.500
381.756
238,590
382,909
113,789
490,736
483,543
689,774
894,082
1,931
0
0
0
230
200
230
470
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,434
3,084
1,122
8.294
424
148
2,505
266
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
58
77
178
82
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,489,720
1,645,585
898,225
1,059.295
903,468
704,464
819,576
679,046
689,187
539,270
951,344
1,323,912
5,188
717,708
591,541
464,109
121,996
107,755
36,136
31,077
1,060,685
1,219,391
1,633,125
2,452,875
1,743,768
1,459,462
3,009,116
2,046,534
593,910
296,603
906,540
2,043,050
619,455
880,939
822,902
699,829
1,922,642
1,851,129
1,131,503
1,178.513
338,483
426,367
368.388
486.722
784.010
1,256,000
1,308,463
1,144,409
1,311,604
1,397,700
1,523,625
1.076.520
437,898
319,017
438,587
142,571
593,523
595,445
808,791
1,072,865
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist. II-6
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15197
DISCHARGE
OFF-SITE
ENERGY
OFF-SITE OFF-SFTE OFF-SITE
TOTAL TOTAL
TRI AIR TRI
TOTAL EMISSIONS TRANSFERS
TOPOTW RECOVERY RECYCLING TREATMENT DISPOSAL TRANSFERS (lbs/vehlch» (IbS/vehlcle)
305
350
1,045
585
5,239
9,136
9,280
4,075
132,884
34,967
101,328
63,970
2,400
10,671
47,851
85,282
0
0
0
0
2,000
497
47
1,953
5,463
12,287
536
496
137,352
62,621
4,340
23,152
22,050
8,981
6,100
496
44,800
1,070
1,522
983
482
14.257
9,195
3,237
1,225
2.365
1.482
155
441,771
580,500
630,500
150.250
33,520
9.193
37,290
19,625
78.991
74,541
141,380
33,860
32,700
20,070
114,355
399,055
497,300
440,460
1,207,896
0
0
0
0
0
547
1,100
9,601
15,505
2,674
1,000
500
377
17,530
23,128
476 '
1,890
7,054
10,620
2,900
6,959
161,025
270,465
145,415
172,474
23,800
0
13,500
0
75,100
16,300
2,060
116,755
260,393
245,373
177,458
25,699
355,000
171.800
281,283
132.600
2,820
0
0
0
45,220
5,426
72,165
117,290
924
83
225,487
82,715
659,050
637,665
492,500
0
0
0
14,000
334,407
554,706
571,235
1,129,846
1,283,673
77,400
680,908
803,502
669,809
40,981
24.749
88,813
59,944
409,600
735,563
810,563
589,652
709,838
608,828
143,967
629,646
585,960
11,950
180,775
331,465
16,400
335,700
325,400
379,000
845,774
329,911
315.887
38,324
8,596
10,036
63,687
21,855
87
48
164
0
524,455
1,014,400
1,212,900
868,600
287,395
510,677
452,621
207,784
1,249,592
1,189,219
612,100
1,173,667
2,268
600 .
1,775
15
5,709
17,315
7,791
5,500
17.473
10,493
64,923
10,865
0
8,017
50,010
49,855
5
1,000
0
0
10,525
18,361
26,289
32,950
9,671
7,962
27,600
2,780
29,361
11,656
9,100
5,774
42,250
26.854
3,710
0
5.449
21.454
6,637
2,551
810
5.518
332
135
22,858
91,749
2,641
1,300
170,275
43.505
100,305
100.055
26,900
19,717
17,662
14,477
17.337
16,451
41,791
44,818
2,420
1,045
7,390
2,415
31,700
45,300
41,916
23.874
11,147
8,380
12,371
15,620
12
19
70
840
0
0
0
0
7,460
1,442
4,138
~ 0
22,001
21,566
23.866
15,868
310
0
0
783
48,300
40.808
109,334
31,850
37,524
12.095
39,435
38,901
7.178
8.471
968
2,515
18,500
183,996
12,622
2,261
47,470
45,805
19,810
16,350
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
2,800
696,743
659,730
617,065
402,070
539,948
512,211
1.280,883
367,856
716.210
625,075
1,308,468
1,374,128
80,359
700,715
911,034
821,291
43,660
26,749
89,313
60,321
447,115
778,991
841,513 .
626,445
754.027
661,263
198.869
655,749
914,008
356,692
339,630
533,648
152,800
412.343
458,044
411,346
1,008,647
380,830
365,541
197,514
277,459
283,655
251,640
53,441
397,670
449,958
298,192
136.316
1,186,791
1,684,210
1,963,515
1,135.255
393,035
545.013
579,738
359,176
1,346,944
1,280,294
1,020,758
1,337,860
9.6
9.9
7.9
5.1
6.1
3.7
4.1
3.1
8.5
6.1
9.0
6.7
10.4
5.8
2.4
1.8
5.9
4.3
1.2
0.9
17.1
13.0
23.0
11.9
10.5
8.6
13.7
8.3
13.2
16.3
7.7
14.1
3.5
5.6
3.7
2.6
8.2
12.4
7.9
5.1
2.5
7.1
2.2
2.3
7.3
14.3
7.9
5.5
5.0
4.8
4.6
3.1
4.1
1.8
1.9
1.7
3.3
2.9
4.7
3.8
4.5
4.0
5.4
1.9
3.6
2.7
6.4
1.7
8.8
7.1
12.3
6.9
160.7
5.7
3.7
3.1
2.1
1.1
3.0
1.8
7.2
8.3
11.8
3.0
4.6
3.9
0.9
2.7
20.3
19.6
2.9
3.7
0.9
2.6
2.1
1.5
4.3
2.6
2.6
0.8
2.1
4.7
1.5
0.3
3.7
5.1
1.8
0.7
4.5
5.8
5.9
3.2
3.7
3.1
2.5
4.2
7.6
6.2
5.9
4.7
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
28
28
28
28
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
30
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-7
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15/97
YEAR NAME
31
31
31
31
32
32
32
32
33
33
33
33
34
34
34
34
35
35
35
35
36
36
36
36
37
37
37
37
38
38
38
38
39
39
39
39
40
40
40
40
41
41
41
41
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
43
44
44
44
44
45
45
45
45
46
46
46
46
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
• Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
STATE. CITY
Mi-Wayne
Mi-Wayne
Mi-Wayne
Mi-Wayne
Mi-Wayne
Mi-Wayne
Mi-Wayne
Mi-Wayne
Ml-Wixom
Ml-Wixom
Ml-Wixom
Ml-Wixom
MN-St. Paul
MN-St Paul
MN-St. Paul
MN-St. Paul
MO-Claycomo
MO-Claycomo
MO-Claycomo
MO-Claycomo
MO-Fenton
MO-Fenton
MO-Fenton
MO-Fenton
MO-Hazelwood
MO-Hazelwood
MO-Hazelwood
MO-Hazelwood
MO-Wentzville
MO-Wentzville
MO-Wentzville
MO-Wentzville
NJ-Edison
NJ-Edison
NJ-Edison
NJ-Edison
NJ-Linden
NJ-Linden
NJ-Linden
NJ-Linden
NY-N. Tarrytown
NY-N. Tarrytown
NY-N. Tarrytown
NY-N. Tarrytown
OH-Avon Lake
OH-Avon Lake
OH-Avon Lake
OH-Avon Lake
OH-East Liberty
OH-East Liberty
OH-East Liberty
OH-East Liberty
OH-Lorain
OH-Lorain
OH-Lorain
OH-Lorain
OH-Lordstown
OH-Lordstown
OH-Lordstown
OH-Lordstown
OH-Marysville
OH-Marysville
OH-Marysville
OH-Marysville
TYPE OF
PLANT
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt Trucks
LL Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Tracks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Both
Both
Both
Both
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt. Tracks
LL Tracks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Auto
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Tracks
Lt. Tracks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Both
Both
Both
Both
Both
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
FUGITIVE STACK RELEASES TO
AIR AIR SURFACE TOTAL TRI
PRODUCTION .EMISSIONS EMISSIONS WATER RELEASES*
188,473
179,143
208,263
312,191
78,881
102,358
133,707
200,312
188,009
168,556
184,403
180,587
125,196
119,712
188,344
208,325
293,435
405,910
421,529
413.564
225,273
257,731
283,445
291,539 .
167,991
200,562
215,576
215,193
210,675
157,335
161,669
not operating
72,857
90,588
135,347
160,714
68.810
0
45,387
159,051
104,987
102.299
117,811
136,522
0
39,266
142,412
153,786
94,217
116.327
120,737
138,119
259,424
338,205
412,948
456,442
436,045
315.719
399,512
232,362
356,980
341,924
283,038
360,591
29,745
18,831
72,730
59,417
15,408
39,722
52.031
124,214
54,059
46,606
21,303
30,020
107,742
123,018
145,888
54,770
76.675
176,396
218,676
186,685
182,435
163,612
150,109
150,609
92,484
122,210
89,550
165,310
906,000
101,505
71,149
5.855
32,632
27,838
50,839
36.846
6,360
0
17,733
21,879
12,800
27,555
23,950
18,000
7,169
25,396
9,421
12,828
108,785
130,665
154,290
128,650
86.601
57,871
51,731
50,21 1
334,990
219,957
72,444
49,663
1,491.305
2,290,434
1,888.000
791.792
1,172,043
365,323
475,327
909,582
561,816
914,735
1,681.606
2.018,235
696,165
899,925
1,170,362
1.208,138
721,060
636,433
671,754
674,981
1,649.576
2,695,065
2,471,292
2,150,932
1,391,264
908,517
883,801
915,931
1,563,246
1,807,278
1,731,290
2,554,641
263,300
1,006,700
800,695
65.685
319,324
387,027
573,400
740.097
62,850
0
172,352
372,385
480,250
407,550
464,300
543,650
598,360
652.216
385,051
986,156
550,095
434,975
313,630
363,060
995,849
805,183
869,719
1,380,554
822,089
541,792
416,097
163,377
2,545,210
1,303,438
1,550,305
1,548,434
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,081
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,500
0
0
0
33,370
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.080
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.201,788
384.154
548,057
968,999
577.224
954,457
1,733.637
2,142,449
755,305
946,531
1,191,665
1,238,158
828,802
759,451
817,642
729,751
1,726,251
2,871,461
2,689,968
2,337,617
1,573,699
1,072,129
1,033.910
1,066,540
1,660,230
1,929,488
1.820,840
2,719,951
1,202,670
1,108,205
871,844
71,540
351 ,956
414,865
624,239
776,943
69,210
0
190,085
394,264
493,050
435,105
488,250
561,650
605,529
677,612
394,472
998,984
658.880
565.640
467,920
491,710
1,082,450
863,054
921,450
1,430,765
1,159,159
761,749
488,541
213,040
4,036,515
3,593,872
3.438.305
2.340.226
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-8
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15/97
TOTAL TOTAL
OFF-SITE TRI AIR TRI
DISCHARGE ENERGY OFF-SITE OFF-SITE OFF-SITE TOTAL EMISSIONS TRANSFERS
TOPOTW RECOVERY RECYCLING TREATMENT DISPOSAL TRANSFERS (Ibs/vehicle) (IDs/vehicle)
55.565
25,354
34,056
36,130
21,790
28.554
17,359
32,059
55,157
12,455
100,419
114,101
57.151
80,092
97,662
103,190
69,363
100,944
58,272
36,488
315,584
98,310
52,761
161,283
58,930
66,070
57,306
52,260
18,170
94,345
78,920
3.370
41,180
20.390
51,770
31,210
5,510
0
31
941
250
250
250
250
22.260
27.532
9,881
46.981
13,950
18,845
2,279
1,030
23.000
15,030
23.260
33.150
243.290
46,616
236,174
116,350
50,080
6,153
3.019
8,207
22,831
36,260
65,077
134,412
220,740
125,813
312,030
301,010
138,430
35,423
25,021
210
331,380
384,400
447,390
0
267,000
308,500
382,400
767,515
47,600
72,743
62,131
24,985
139,600
101,390
135,340
70,750
469.900
184,700
114,401
53,950
0
0
0
0
0
0
87,239
159,636
1,104,700
610,050
213,500
426,100
141,300
92,852
58,076
28,773
1,140,870
967,550
611,624
450.695
521,500
337,700
382,500
365.800
634,000
224,565
4,341
15.974
2,684,505
3,490,534
1,933,905
1,803,513
754,093
715,955
743,632
724,800
119,890
164,900
561,520
1,065,815
1,615,653
891,910
740,470
972,500
390.600
575,991
636,300
1,229,200
1,025,200
2,297,180
2,008,000
2,299,200
34,520
435,919
180,978
284,621
783,830
1,072,700
1,179.300
1,293,200
170,550
71,900
72.540
0
375,720
621,102
932.350
1,033,770
265,000
0
114,418
25,787
10,343
334,900
702,750
210,200
187,330
392,440
614,370
1,321,870
130,800
244,750
235,830
230,700
147.726
358,574
402.501
641,801
859,000
564.299
125.380
103,745
355,700
337,316
155,604
3,053
0
0
120
4,519
8,055
930
4,191
26,530
25,714
71,445
43,505
70,155
7.638
2.070
2,891
0
0
0
0
0
16,292
8,467
41,176
12.062
36,550
35,000
73.300
0
255
3,505
25,445
270
0
0
0
0
319,480
2,609
2,805
1,909
750
1,000
0
0
18,071
22,951
21.941
18,443
1,590
3,035
1,555
2,280
35.975
21.206
24,101
0
67,680
106,620
133,597
1,593
5,060
6,813
4,881
9,877
14,120
21,130
23,640
26,200
16,130
39,650
11,220
19,253
18,158
7,285
12,975
15,200
9,900
0
11,900
14,610
67,628
105,735
90,608
64,364
135,888
71.152
41,410
78,411
31,780
51,000
52,860
24,700
33,785
20,470
7.194
270
11.930
10,511
9.811
19,000
0
0
15,846
14,220
0
0
1.250
1,000
11,300
9,060
16,425
30.540
25,440
34,975
36,633
35,110
6,500
8,730
11,150
44,201
29,849
24,535
3.158
65,916
140,970
162.344
60,276
130,058
846,609
798,699
866,525
926,061
386,605
359,847
906,320
1,444,667
1.853,112
1,018,518
922,390
1,172.166
796.669
1,042,553
1,196,143
1,347,000
1,429,191
2,812,359
2,539,280
3,167,567
549,884
686,591
378,456 .
561,362
1,050,690
1,326,160
1,498,106
1,440,910
692,660
374,920
298,500
57,860
428.830
652,003
993,931
1,083,980
589,990
2.609
220.339
202,493
1,116,043
946,200
917,750
637,550
380,261
544.835
720,693
1,446,607
1,312,650
1,269,155
887,921
719,815
734,701
741,240
843,512
1,084,952
1,833,819
966,635
502,650
303,578
3,236,315
4,003,160
2,157,685
1,954,708
6.4
2.1
2.6
3.1
7.3
9.3
13.0
10.7
4.0
5.6
6.5
6.9
6.6
6.3
4.3
3.5
5.9
7.1
6.4
5.7
7.0
4.2
3.6
3.7
9.9
9.6
8.4
12.6
5.6
7.0
5.4
?
4.8
4.6
4.6
4.8
1.0
np
4.2
2.5
4.7
4.3
4.1
4.1
np
17.3
2.8
6.5
7.0
4.9
3.9
3.6
4.2
2.6
2.2
3.1
2.7
2.4
1.2
0.9
11.3
10.5
12.1
6.5
4.5
4.5
4.2
3.0
4.9
3.5
6.8
7.2
9.9
6.0
5.0
6.5
6.4
8.7
6.4
6.5
4.9
6.9
6.0
7.7
2.4
2.7
1.3
1.9
6.3
6.6
6.9
6.7
3.3
2.4
1.8
?
5.9
7.2
7.3
6.7
8.6
np
4.9
1.3
10.6
9.2
7.8
4.7
np
13.9
5.1
9.4
13.9
10.9
7.4
5.2
2.8
2.2
2.0
2.4
4.2
3.1
1.3
1.3
9.1
11.7
7.6
5.4
31
31
31
31
32
32
32
32
33
33
33
33
34
34
34
34
35
35
35
35
36
36
36
36
37
37
37
37
38
38
38
38
39
39
39
39
40
40
40
40
41
41
41
41
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
43
44
44
44
44
45
45
45
45
46
46
46
46
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-9
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15/97
YEAR NAME
47
47
47
47
48
48
48
48
49
49
49
49
50
50
50
50
51
51
51
51
52
52
52
52
53
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
55
55
55
55
56
56
56
56
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
1991
1992
1993
1994
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
. Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
BMW Mfg.
BMW Mfg.
BMW Mfg.
BMW Mfg.
Nissan Motor Mfg.
Nissan Motor Mfg.
Nissan Motor Mfg.
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Fonj Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
FortJ Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
STATE, CITY
OH-Moraine
OH -Moraine
OH-Moraine
OH-Moraine
OH-Toledo#1
OH-Toledo#1
OH-Toledo#1
OH-Toledo#1
OH-Toledo#2
OH-Toledo#2
OH-Toledo#2
OH-Toledo#2
OK-Oklahoma City
OK-Oklahoma City
OK-Oklahoma City
OK-Oklahoma City
SC-Greer
SC-Greer
SC-Greer
SC-Greer
TN-Smyma
TN -Smyrna
TN-Smyma
TN-Smyma
TN-Spring Hill
TN-Spring Hill
TN-Spring Hill
TN-Spring Hill
TX-Artington
TX-Artington
TX-Artington
TX-Artington
VA-Norfolk
VA-Norfolk
VA-Norfolk
VA-Norfolk
Wl-Janesville
Wl-Janesville
Wl-Janesville
Wl-Janesville
FUGITIVE STACK RELEASES TO
TYPE OF AIR AIR SURFACE TOTAL TRI
PLANT PRODUCTION EMISSIONS EMISSIONS WATER RELEASES*
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Both
Both
Both
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
198,284
184,592
211,523
130,239
170,753
171,715
231,161
303,957
1,494
1,494
86,238
141,855
237,049
221,960
245,829
268,900
0
0
429
265,023
300,328
385,972
444,608
95,821
212.112
282,657
280,002
127,900
162,900
112,499
173,923
117,315 .
119,783
153,910
181,840
35,261
177,022
219,578
237,925
10,255
4,510
4,900
4,536
83,465
45,962
92,751
131,763
1
17
1,406
711
160,592
71,558
113,780
51,843
-
99,206
37,221
157,475
201,823
197,684
90.362
79,722
220,849
334,110
219,500
253,135
213,955
17,202
10,097
100.233
23,384
69,462
274,716
268,920
155,397
1,770,713
1,551,315
1,689,000
521,610
687,099
545,090
811,344
1.222,349
0
15
1,155
531
1,112,312
981,185
1,023,346
1,119,137
-
2,401,002
2,793,616
2,361,840
2,226,962
838,715
769,314
674,093
851,633
1,000,105
930,055
896,260
867,500
528,386
420,532
557,983
652,264
181,813
524.023
773,900
589,100
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
500
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
70
0
19
0
1,780,968
1,555,825
1.693,900
526,146
770,567
591,052
904,095
1,354,112
1
32
2,561
1,242
1,272,904
1,052,743
1,137,126
1,170,980
0
0
0
0
2,500,208
2,830,837
2,519,315
2,428,785
1,036,399
859.676
753,815
1,072,482
1,334.715
1.150,055
1,149,395
1.081,455
545,588
430,629
658,216
675,648
251,345
798.739
1.042.839
744.497
* Includes fugitive air releases, stack air releases, and surface water discharges.
" Includes discharges to POTWs and off-site transfers for energy recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal.
- Not applicable ? Not available
SOURCES: All TRI data - U.S. EPA Toxics Release Inventory
Production - Automotive News, annual Market Data Book and AAMA; production for Chrysler plants provided by Chrysler.
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-10
-------
TRI RELEASE AND TRANSFER TRENDS
BY ASSEMBLY PLANT
1991-1994
(Ibs./year)
7/15/97
DISCHARGE
TOPOTW
0
0
0
0
21,576
68,952
60,590
73,858
0
0
0
0
1,996
2,431
3,221
1,472
-
-
-
0
1,590
1,677
9,566
6,064
63,680
29,984
31,497
9,660
73.115
26,125
18.660
2,350
24,140
35,110
23.320
19,550
6,520
13,881
7,934
11,320
OFF-SITE
ENERGY
OFF-SITE OFF-SITE OFF-SITE
TOTAL
RECOVERY RECYCLING TREATMENT DISPOSAL TRANSFERS
0
0
0
244,000
271,642
. 407,470
289,548
10,267
0
38
606
581
328,493
359,459
535,961
336,812
-
-
-
0
0
0
15,427
6,016
602,114
46,749
26,175
2,891
512,950
326,125
359.445
281,740
83,720
114,005
79,100
80,965
0
0
0
0
2,337,000
2,304,500
2,729,000
401,000
2,074
378
2.195
291,353
0
4
4
1
1,114,463
1.198,381
1,317,435
821,453
-
-
-
0
1,245,978
1,598,984
459,794
752,305
677,855
19,257,884
1,156,945
798,077
285,200
336,300
332,200
295,300
85,000
0
503,630
1,495.169
0
1,288,916
1,553.110
1.355.241
169,550
124,250
120,650
0
20.309
106,001
74,935
38,946
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
.
-
0
280
130
0-
0
49,781
26,139
27,303
1,723
1.005
1,015
0
0
0
23
1
0
770,696
134
0
0
0
0
0
1,380
3,605
56
20
2
0
0
8
0
73
11
5,081
5,269
-
-
-
0
87,378
79,229
113,302
38,902
80,664
165,212
108,139
128,631
3,505
9,195
7,090
9,485
11,000
8,970
14,430
17,700
6,700
17,660
19,482
133,380
2,506,550
2,428,750
2,849,650
646,380
319.206
602,857
427,288
414,426
0
42
618
582
1,445,025
1,560,282
1,861,698
1,165,006
0
0
0
0
1,335,226
1,680,020
598,089
805,287
1,674.294
19,525,966
1,350,059
941,002
875,775
700,760
717,415
588,875
203,860
158,108
620,481
1,613,384
783,916
1,320,591
1,580,526
1,499,941
TOTAL TOTAL
TRI AIR TRI
EMISSIONS TRANSFERS
(Ibs/vehlcle) (Ibs/vehlcle)
9.0
8.4
5.9
4.0
4.5
3.4
2.9
3.0
ed with Toledo #1)
ed with Toledo #1]
ed with Toledo #1]
ed with Toledo #1]
5.4
4.7
4.6
4.4
-
.
0.0
0.0
9.4
9.4
6.5
5.5
10.8
4.1
2.7
3.8
10.4
7.1
10.2
6.2
4.7
3.6
4.3
3.7
7.1
4.5
4.7
3.1
12.6
13.2
7
5.0
1.9
3.5
1.3
1.4
6.1
7.0
7.6
4.3
-
.
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.6
1.5
1.8
17.5
92.1
4.8
3.4
6.8
4.3
6.4
3.4
1.7
1.3
4.0
8.9
22.2
7.5
7.2
6.3
47
47
47
47
48
48
48
48
49
49
49
49
50
50
50
SO
51
51
51
51
52
52
52
52
53
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
55
55
55
55
56
56
56
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-11
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1991 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
39 | Ford Motor Co.
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
TOTAL
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont,
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing (C)
Ml, Lansing (M)
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
TYPE
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Both
Both
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
1991
PRODUCTION
209,169
173,265
171,933
105,151
210,715
178,087
218,328
153,936
173,908
116,297
114,718
21,082
187,726
33,298
393,762
154,765
148,446
81,558
500
20,645
62,210
165,314
45,098
178,762
235,585
~ "135,173
107,498
261,072
107,346
177,336
188,473
78,881
188,009
125,196
293,435
225,273
167,991
210,675
72,857
68,810
104,987
0
94,217
259,424
436,045
356,980
198,284
170,753
1,494
237,049
0
265,023
95,821
127,900
117,315
35,261
8,462,836
SOURCES: All TRI data - U.S. EPA 1991 Toxics Release Inventory
FUGITIVE
AIR
EMISSIONS
87,840
92,336
107,495
. 154,943
215,069
104,949
49,520
2,942
139,091
28,925
23,755
6,497
30,015
52,372
40,213
37,139
84,212
78,278
320
121,996
23,855
153,778
154,350
258,850
330,542
63,625
224,550
15,203
56,142
102,787
29,745
15,408
54,059
107,742
76,675
182,435
92,484
906,000
32,632
6,360
12,800
7,169
108,785
86,601
334,990
1,491,305
10,255
83,465
1
160,592
-
99,206
197,684
334,110
17,202
69,462
7,358,756
STACK
AIR
EMISSIONS
658,460
578,399
521.158
874,871
775,512
396,864
1,572,679
281,829
1,172;530
610,440
932,250
294,763
1,176,670
175,521
1,826,777
1,450,650
819,026
610,909
4,868
0
1,036,830
1,587,556
439,136
360,105
1,592,100
274,800
559,460
1,296,401
381,756
490,736
1,172,043
561,816
696,165
721,060
1.649,576
1,391,264
1,563,246
263,300
319,324
62,850
480,250
598,360
550,095
995,849
822,089
2,545,210
1,770,713
687,099
0
.1,112.312
-
2,401,002
838,715
1,000,105
528,386
181,813
45,665,698
RELEASES TO
SURFACE
WATER
25
0
0
0
0
360
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
1,931
230
0
0
0
0
2,434
424
500
0
58
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,081
0
0
0
4,500
33,370
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,080
0
0
3
0
0
-
0
0
500
0
70
53,566
Production - American Automobile Manufacturers Association; production for Chrysler plants provided by Chrysler
* Includes fugitive air releases, stack air releases, and surface water discharges.
TOTAL
RELEASES*
746,325
670,735
628,653
1,029,814
990,581
502,173
1,622,199
284,771
1,311,621
639,365
956,005
301,260
1,208,685
227,893
1,866,990
1,489,720
903,468
689,187
5,188
121,996
1,060,685
1,743,768
593.910
619,455
1,922,642
338,483
784,010
1,311,604
437,898
593,523
1,201,788
577,224
755,305
828,802
1,726,251
1,573,699
1,660,230
1,202,670
351,956
69,210
493,050
605,529
658,880
1,082,450
1,159.159
4,036,515
1,780,968
770,567
1
1,272,904
-
2.500,208
1,036,399
1,334,715
545,588
251,345
53,078,020
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-12
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1991 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
DISCHARGE
TOPOTW
63,490
60,995
0
100,626
4,851
221,020
103,754
0
40,020
5
255
0
2,255
52,145
301,321
305
5,239
132,884
2,400
0
2,000
5,463
137,352
22,050
44,800
482
1,225
441,771
33,520
78,991
55,565
21,790
55,157
57,151
69,363
315,584
58,930
18,170
41,180
5,510
250
22,260
13,950
23,000
243,290
50,080
0
21,576
0
1,996
-
1,590
63,680
73,115
24,140
6,520
3,103,066
OFF-SITE
ENERGY
RECOVERY
331,495
400,420
0
429,745
7,234
313,000
4,140
0
0
1,386,400
306,600
0
43,915
92,790
20,800
32,700
497,300
0
547
2,674
17,530
7,054
161,025
23,800
75,100
260,393
355,000
2,820
45,220
924
22,831
220,740
138,430
331,380
267,000
47,600
139,600
469,900
0
0
1,104,700
141,300
1,140,870
521,500
634,000
2,684,505
0
271,642
0
328,493
-
0
802,114
512.950
83,720
0
14,681,901
OFF-SITE
RECYCLING
541,200
0
886,368
327,010
522,167
0
597,179
25,521
797,000
12,800
0
0
4,121,200
0
1,252,540
659.050
0
554,706
77,400
40,981
409,600
709,838
585,960
16,400
845,774
8,596
87
524,455
287,395
1,249,592
754,093
119,890
1,615,653
390,600
1,025,200
34,520
783,830
170,550
375,720
265,000
10,343
187,330
130,800
147,726
859,000
355,700
2,337,000
2,074
0
1,114,463
-
1,245,978
677,855
285,200
85,000
0
28,026,344
OFF-SITE
TREATMENT
12
15,722
53,606
17,373
13,008
4,351
5,543
0
17,374
5,450
16,860
390,231
60,540
411
30,001
2,268
5,709
17,473
0
5
10,525
9,671
29,361
42,250
5,449
810
22,858
170,275
26,900
17,337
0
8,055
25,714
7,638
0
16,292
36,550
255
0
319,480
750
18.071
1.590
35,975
67,680
5,060
169,550
20,309
0
0
-
280
49,781
1,005
0
770,696
2,546,104
OFF-SITE
DISPOSAL
32,610
0
0
0
35,700
18,004
45,900
0
442,376
0
2,700
0
1,265
1,880
• 33,210
2,420
31,700
11,147
12
0
7,460
22,001
310
48.300
-«* 37,524
7,178
18,500
47,470
0
100
14,120
16,130
18,158
9,900
67,628
135,888
31,780
33,785
11,930
0
0
11,300
25,440
6,500
29.849
140,970
0
3,605
0
73
-
87,378
80,864
3,505
11,000
6,700
1,594,270
TOTAL
TRANSFERS'*
968,807
477,137
939,974
874,754
582,960
556,375
756,516
25,521
1,296,770
1,404,655
326,415
390,231
4,229,175
147,226
1,637,872
696,743
539,948
716,210
80,359
43,660
447,115
754,027
914,008
152,800
1,008,647
277,459
397,670
1,186,791
393,035
1,346,944
846,609
386,605
1,853,112
796,669
1,429.191
549,884
1,050,690
692,660
428,830
589,990
1,116,043
380,261
1,312,650
734,701
1,833,819
3,236,315
2,506,550
319,206
0
1,445.025
-
1,335.226
1.674.294
875.775
203.860
783.916
49,951,685
TOTAL AIR
EMISSIONS
(Ibs/vehlcle)
3.6
3.9
3.7
9.8
4.7
2.8
7.4
1.8
7.5
5.5
8.3
14.3
6.4
6.8
4.7
9.6
6.1
8.5
10.4
5.9
17.1
10.5
13.2
3.5
8.2
2.5
7.3
5.0
4.1
3.3
6.4
7.3
4.0
6.6
5.9
7.0
9.9
5.6
4.8
1.0
4.7
np
7.0
4.2
2.7
11.3
9.0
4.5
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
(Ibs/vehlcle)
4.6
2.8
5.5
8.3
2.8
3.1
3.5
0.2
7.5
12.1
2.8
18.5
22.5
4.4
4.2
4.5
3.6
8.8
160.7
2.1
7.2
4.6
20.3
0.9
4.3
2.1
3.7
4.5
3.7
7.6
4.5
4.9
9.9
6.4
4.9
2.4
6.3
3.3
5.9
8.6
10.6
np
13.9
2.8
4.2
9.1
12.6
1.9
[included with Toledo #1]
5.4
-
9.4
10.8
10.4
4.7
7.1
6.3
** Includes discharges to POTWs and off-site transfers for energy recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal.
6.1
.
5.0
17.5
6.8
1.7
22.2
5.9
*•* From all TRI reporters within 3-mile radius of assembly plant (includes assembly plant); see Part III Plant-Community Profiles.
- Not applicable |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-13
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1992 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors Corp.
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
30 1 Chrysler Corp.
31 1 Ford Motor Co.
32 1 Ford Motor Co.
33| Ford Motor Co.
34 j Ford Motor Co.
35 Ford Motor Co.
36' Chrysler Corp.
37 Ford Motor Co.
38 1 General Motors
39 Ford Motor Co.
40| General Motors
41 General Motors
42 Ford Motor Co.
43' Honda
44| Ford Motor Co.
45; General Motors
46 Honda (Marysville)
47 i General Motors
48! Chrysler Corp.
49 1 Chrysler Corp.
50! General Motors
51 ! BMW Manufacturing
52
53
54
55
56
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
TOTAL
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont,
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing (C)
Ml, Lansing (M)
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Wan-en
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
TYPE
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Both
Both
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
1992
PRODUCTION
256,180
193,826
187,441
76,855
275,232
155,107
275,920
139,783
185,938
124,020
110,465
20,839
240,382
45,542
380,645
166,999
190,849
88,568
122,961
24,772
94,068
168,859
18.203
157,947
""149,232
60,351
87,668
288,617
173,147
208,099
179,143
102,358
168.556
119,712
405,910
257,731
200,562
157,335
90,588
0
102,299
39,266
116,327
338,205
315,719
341,924
184,592
171,715
1,494
221,960
0
300,328
212,112
162,900
119,783
177,022
9,156,056
SOURCES: All TRI data - U.S. EPA 1992 Toxics Release Inventory
FUGITIVE
AIR
EMISSIONS
109,261
140,914
108,099
76,966
163,033
131,654
53,899
-. 117,134
148,040
9,025
30,600
3,221
27,065
45,360
49,360
31,115
95,342
33,417
156,641
255
44.162
173,038
47.890
313,673
317,019
136,390
225,800
200,780
80,427
111,902
18,831
39.722
46,606
123,018
176,396
163,612
122,210
101,505
27,838
0
27,555
25,396
130,665
57,871
219,957
2,290,434
4,510
45,962
17
71,558
•
37,221
90,362
219,500
10,097
274,716
7,507,041
STACK
AIR
EMISSIONS
628,454
607,460
566,722
422,418
1,013,141
435.843
1,516,712
64,423
997,170
736,765
1,135,005
198,821
1,036,850
245,700
1,475,159
1,614,470
608,922
505,853
561,067
107,500
1,175,229
1,283,340
248,565
567.266
1,534,110
289,900
1,030,200
1,196,920
238,590
483,543
365,323
914,735
899,925
636,433
2,695,065
908,517
1,807,278
1,006,700
387,027
0
407,550
652,216
434,975
805,183
541,792
1,303,438
1,551,315
545,090
15
981,185
-
2,793,616
769,314
930,055
420,532
524,023
44,807,420
Production - Automotive News, 1993 Market Data Book and AAMA; production for Chrysler plants
* Includes fugitive air releases, stack air releases, and surface water discharges.
RELEASES TO
SURFACE
WATER
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
200
0
0
0
0
3,084
148
0
0
77
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
500
0
0
6,019
TOTAL
RELEASES*
737,725
748,374
674,821
499,384
1,176,174
567.497
1,570,611
181,557
1,145,210
745,790
1,165,605
202,042
1,065,915
291,060
1,524,519
1,645,585
704,464
539,270
717,708
107,755
1,219,391
1,459,462
296,603
880,939
1,851,129
426,367
1,256,000
1.397,700
319,017
595,445
384,154
954,457
946,531
759,451
2,871,461
1,072,129
1,929,488
1,108,205
414,865
0
435,105
677,612
565,640
863,054
761,749
3,593,872
1,555,825
591,052
32
1,052,743
-
2,830,837
859,676
1,150,055
430,629
798,739
52,320,480
provided by Chrysler
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-14
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1992 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
DISCHARGE
TOPOTW
34,514
. 13,516
0
64,081
5,709
230,652
98,040
0
19,150
40
250
337
10,255
17,930
142,593
350
9,136
34,967
10,671
0
497
12,287
62,621
8,981
1,070
14,257
2,365
580,500
9,193
74,541
25,354
28,554
12,455
80,092
100,944
98,310
66,070
94,345
20,390
0
250
27,532
18,845
15,030
46,616
6,153
0
88,952
0
2,431
-
1,677
29,984
28,125
35,110
13,881
2,299,603
OFF-SITE
ENERGY
RECOVERY
144,450
662,000
0
431,761
9,639
469,629
77,200
0
0
390,100
148,000
0
59,175
106,413
0
20,070
440,460
0
1,100
1,000
23,128
10,620
270,465
0
16,300
245,373
171,800
0
5,426
83
36,260
125,813
35,423
384,400
308,500
72,743
101,390
184,700
0
0
610,050
92,852
967,550
337,700
224,565
3,490,534
0
407,470
38
359,459
-
0
46,749
326,125
114,005
0
11,930,518
OFF-SITE
RECYCLING
908,600
0
769,183
288,363
653,700
169,359
910,160
2,039,580
1,063,000
9,500
250
0
2,426,800
0
1,484,930
637,665
0
571,235
680,908
24,749
735,563
608,828
11,950
335,700
329,911
10,036
48
1,014,400
510,677
1,189,219
715,955
164,900
891,910
575,991
2,297,180
435,919
1,072,700
71,900
621,102
0
334,900
392,440
244,750
358,574
564,299
337,316
2,304,500
378
4
.1,198,381
-
1,598,984
19,257,884
336,300
0
1,288,916
52,449,497
OFF-SITE
TREATMENT
0
14,510
62,399
10,812
23,011
1,228
2,282
0
61,270
6,600
3,350
188,976
55,405
690
0
600
17,315
10,493
8,017
1,000
18,361
7,962
11,656
26,854
21,454
5,518
91,749
43,505
19,717
16,451
0
930
71,445
2,070
0
8,467
35,000
3,505
0
2,609
1,000
22,951
3,035
21,206
106,620
6,813
124,250
106,001
0
0
-
130
26,139
1,015
23
134
1,274,528
OFF-SITE
DISPOSAL***
38,420
29.155
0
0
42,090
10,689
37,980
0
394,615
0
4,000
5,068
3,270
2,200
36,922
1,045
45,300
8,380
19
0
1,442
21,566
0
40,808
„-... 12,095
8,471
183,996
45,805
0
0
21.130
39.650
7,285
0
105,735
71,152
51,000
20,470
10,511
0
0
9,060
34,975
8,730
24,535
162,344
0
56
0
11
-
79,229
165.212
9,195
8,970
17,660
1,820,246
TOTAL
TRANSFERS"
1,125,984
719,181
831,582
795,017
734,149
881.557
1.125.662
2,039,580
1,538,035
406,240
155,850
194,381
2,554,905
127,233
1,664,445
659,730
512,211
625,075
700,715
26,749
778,991
661,263
356,692
412,343
380,830
283,655
449,958
1,684,210
545,013
1,280,294
798,699
359,847
1,018,518
1,042,553
2,812,359
686,591
1,326,160
374,920
652,003
2,609
946,200
544,835
1,269,155
741,240
966,635
4,003,160
2,428,750
602,857
42
1,560,282
-
1,680,020
19,525,968
700,760
158,108
1,320,591
69,774,392
TOTAL AIR
EMISSIONS
(Ibs/vehlcle)
2.9
3.9
3.6
6.5
4.3
3.7
5.7
1.3
6.2
6.0
10.6
9.7
4.4
6.4
4.0
9.9
3.7
6.1
5.8
4.3
13.0
8.6
16.3
5.6
12.4
7.1
14.3
4.8
1.8
2.9
2.1
9.3
5.6
6.3
7.1
4.2
9.6
7.0
4.6
np
4.3
17.3
4.9
2.6
2.4
10.5
8.4
3.4
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
(Ibs/vehicle)
4.4
3.7
4.4
10.3
2.7
5.7
4.1
14.6
8.3
3.3
1.4
9.3
10.6
2.8
4.4
4.0
2.7
7.1
5.7
1.1
8.3
3.9
19.6
2.6
2.6
4.7
5.1
5.8
3.1
6.2
4.5
3.5
6.0
8.7
6.9
2.7
6.6
2.4
7.2
np
9.2
13.9
10.9
2.2
3.1
11.7
13.2
3.5
[included with Toledo #1]
4.7
-
9.4
4.1
7.1
3.6
4.5
5.7
** Includes discharges to POTWs and off-site transfers for energy recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal.
- Not applicable
7.0
.
5.6
92.1
4.3
1.3
7.5
7.6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-15
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1993 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
TOTAL
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont,
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml. Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing (C)
Ml, Lansing (M)
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
TYPE
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
1993
PRODUCTION
321,404
206,545
202,654
101,073
279,018
56,601
286,962
136,035
229,654
124,004
119,883
22,578
234,060
64,848
415,674
114,312
200,201
106,238
245,321
29,719
71,114
219,096
117,116
221,743
r~"- 142,886
169,889
165,418
330,952
229,557
172,972
208,263
133,707
184,403
188,344
421,529
283,445
215,576
161,669
135,347
45,387
117,811
142,412
120,737
412,948
399,512
283,038
211,523
231,161
86,238
245,829
-
385,972
282,657
112,499
153,910
219,578
10,721,022
SOURCES: All TRI data - U.S. EPA 1993 Toxics Release Inventory
FUGITIVE
AIR
EMISSIONS
144,660
120,747
232,181
103.142
168,713
70,465
51,643
360,642
186.000
10,215
18,855
6,434
22,900
33,400
70,840
9,485
91,639
64,369
94,158
1,000
27,063
254,435
128,120
441,102
177,624
83,710
205,460
74,010
55,678
119.017
72,730
52,031
21,303
145,888
218,676
150,109
89,550
71,149
50,839
17,733
23,950
9,421
154,290
51,731
72,444
1,888,000
4,900
92,751
1,406
113,780
-
157,475
79,722
253,135
100,233
268,920
7,589,873
STACK
AIR
EMISSIONS
419.050
811,012
594,040
717,046
988.771
135,535
1.162,922
130,217
1,230,600
622.505
833,255
259,551
907,600
646,793
1,531,589
888,740
727,707
886,975
497,383
35,136
1,606,062
2,753,559
775,915
381,800
953,879
284,500
1,103,000
1,449,615
382,909
689,774
475,327
1,681,606
1,170,362
671,754
2,471,292
883,801
1,731,290
800,695
573,400
172,352
464,300
385,051
313,630
869,719
416,097
1.550,305
1.689,000
811,344
1,155
1,023.346
-
2,361,840
674,093
896,260
557,983
773,900
47,827,342
RELEASES TO
SURFACE
WATER
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
0
2,000
0
0
0
230
0
0
0
0
1122
2,505
0
0
178
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
19
6,323
Production - Automotive News, 1994 Market Data Book; production for Chrysler plants provided by Chrysler
* Includes fugitive air releases, stack air releases, and surface water discharges.
TOTAL
RELEASES'
563,726
931,759
826,221
820,188
1,157,484
206,000
1.214,565
490.859
1,416,600
632,720
852,360
265,985
932,500
680.193
1,602,429
898,225
819,576
951,344
591,541
36,136
1,633,125
3,009,116
906,540
822,902
1,131,503
368,388
1,308,463
1,523,625
438,587
808,791
548,057
1,733,637
1,191,665
817,642
2,689,968
1,033,910
1.820,840
871,844
624,239
190,085
488.250
394,472
467,920
921,450
488,541
3,438,305
1,693,900
904.095
2.561
1,137,126
.
2,519.315
753,815
1,149.395
658,216
1,042.839
55,423,538
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-16
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1993 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
DISCHARGE
TOPOTW
1,798
172,290
0
46,500
8,040
54,165
104,790
0
15,250
1,040
250
121
2,505
34,800
134,954
1,045
9,280
101,328
47,851
0
47
536
4.340
6,100
1,522
9,195
1,482
630,500
37,290
141,380
34,056
17,359
100,419
97,662
58,272
52,761
57,306
78,920
51,770
31
250
9,881
2,279
23,260
236,174
3,019
0
60,590
0
3,221
-
9,566
31,497
18,680
23,320
7,934
2,546,626
OFF-SITE
ENERGY
RECOVERY
28,456
73,266
0
35,096
0
146,014
9,020
0
24,650
138,780
440,750
0
124,110
282,142
103,070
114,355
1,207,896
0
9,601
500
476
2,900
145,415
13,500
2,060
177,458
281,283
0
72,165
225,487
65,077
312,030
25,021
447,390
382,400
62,131
135,340
114,401
0
87,239
213,500
58,076
611,624
382,500
4,341
1,933,905
0
289,548
606
535,961
-
15,427
26,175
359,445
79,100
0
9,799,687
OFF-SITE
RECYCLING
1,092,400
678,685
1,205,934
692,843
990,020
48,718
911,247
1.892,400
705,800
870,005
250
0
1,928,150
520,000
1,527,280
492,500
14,000
1,129,846
803,502
88,813
810,563
143,967
180,775
325,400
315,887
63.687
164
1.212,900
452,621
612,100
743,632
561,520
740,470
636,300
2,008,000
180,978
1,179,300
72,540
932,350
114,418
702,750
614,370
235,830
402,501
125,380
155,604
2,729,000
2,195
4
1,317,435
-
459,794
1,156,945
332,200
503,630
1,553,110
37,170,713
OFF-SITE
TREATMENT
1,250
27,877
343,345
41,220
34.420
1,346
77
0
4,300
27,840
1,750
192,639
72,485
4,980
0
1,775
7,791
64,923
50,010
0
26,289
27,600
9,100
3,710
. 6,637
332
2,641
100,305
17,662
41,791
120
4,191
43,505
2,891
0
41,176
73,300
25,445
0
2,805
0
21,941
1,555
24,101
133,597
4,881
120,650
74,935
0
0
-
0
27,303
0
1
0
1,716,492
OFF-SITE
DISPOSAL"*
39,222
56,076
26.455
0
90,430
1,220
40,200
0
331,705
5
4,760
0
7,900
3,300
64,110
7.390
41,916
12,371
70
0
4,138
23,866
0
109,334
•— 39,435
968
12,622
19,810
0
0
23,640
11,220
12,975
11,900
90,608
41,410
52,860
7,194
9,811
15,846
1,250
16,425
36,633
11,150
3,158
60,276
0
20
8
5,081
-
113,302
108,139
7,090
14,430
19,482
1,611,211
,
TOTAL
TRANSFERS**
1,163,126
1,008,194
1,575,734
815,659
1,122,910
251,463
1,065,334
1,892,400
1,081,705
1,037,670
447,760
192,760
2,135,150
845,222
1,829,414
617,065
1,280,883
1.308,468
911,034
89,313
841,513
198,869
339,630
458,044
365,541
251,640
298,192
1,963,515
579,738
1,020,758
866,525
906,320
922,390
1,196,143
2,539,280
378,456
1,498,106
298,500
993,931
220,339
917,750
720,693
887,921
843,512
502,650
2,157,685
2,849,650
427,288
618
1,861,698
-
598,089
1,350,059
717,415
620,481
1,580.526
52,844,729
TOTAL AIR
EMISSIONS
(Ibs/vehlcle)
1.8
4.5
4.1
8.1
4.1
3.6
4.2
3.6
6.2
5.1
7.1
11.8
4.0
10.5
3.9
7.9
4.1
9.0
2.4
1.2
23.0
13.7
7.7
3.7
7.9
2.2
7.9
4.6
1.9
4.7
2.6
13.0
6.5
4.3
6.4
3.6
8.4
5.4
4.6
4.2
4.1
2.8
3.9
2.2
1.2
12.1
5.9
2.9
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
(Ibs/vehicle)
3.6
4.9
7.8
8.1
4.0
4.4
3.7
13.9
4.7
8.4
3.7
8.5
9.1
13.0
4.4
5.4
6.4
12.3
3.7
3.0
11.8
0.9
2.9
2.1
2.6
1.5
1.8
5.9
2.5
5.9
4.2
6.8
5.0
6.4
6.0
1.3
6.9
1.8
7.3
4.9
7.8
5.1
7.4
2.0
1.3
7.6
?
1.3
[included with Toledo #1]
4.6
-
6.5
2.7
10.2
4.3
4.7
5.2
** Includes discharges to POTWs and off-site transfers for energy recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal.
*** Includes 14,700 Ibs. transferred off-site for which management method is not reported.
- Not applicable ? Not available
7.6
-
1.5
4.8
6.4
4.0
7.2
4.9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-17
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1994 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
.1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors Corp.
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
44 | Ford Motor Co.
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
TOTAL
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont,
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing (C)
Ml, Lansing (M)
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
TYPE
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Auto
Auto
Auto
Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Both
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
Auto
Auto
Both
Auto
Auto
Lt. Trucks
Lt. Trucks
1994
PRODUCTION
363,083
220,947
230,925
124,395
275,222
242,806
277,770
168,726
228,728
154,801
138,120
25,390
284,765
128,000
371,288
206,400
216,036
199,048
262,955
32,863
205,578
246,991
144,541
268,784
-^233,227
212,250
206,959
352,768
84,874
285,536
312,191
200,312
180,587
208,325
413,564
291,539
215,193
not operating
160,714
159,051
136,522
153,786
138,119
456,442
232,362
360,591
130,239
303,957
141,855
268,900
429
444.608
280,002
173,923
181,840
237,925
12,176,752
SOURCES: All TRI data - U.S. EPA 1994 Toxics Release Inventory
FUGITIVE
AIR
EMISSIONS
105,316
143,751
18,371
106,687
46,942
105,089
75,820
368,529
140.500
10,395
11,070
5,863
20,600
117,322
129,581
605
88,462
33,548
112,062
1,753
37,567
262,895
181,642
282,914
154,412
67,100
188,360
51,020
28,782
178,783
59,417
124,214
30,020
54,770
186,685
150,609
165,310
5,855
36,846
21,879
18,000
12,828
128.650
50,211
49,663
791,792
4,536
131,763
711
51,843
-
201,823
220,849
213,955
23,384
155,397
5.966,751
STACK
AIR
EMISSIONS
496,067
508,395
1,267,199
913,252
1,102,089
256,337
1,153,698
4,365
948,100
981,645
952,250
142,366
1,001,455
418,872
1,231,514
1,058,690
590,114
1,290,364
352,047
29,324
2,415,308
1,775,345
1,861,142
416,915
1,024,101
419,540
956,049
1,025,500
113,789
894,082
909,582
2,018,235
1.208,138
674,981
2,150,932
915,931
2,554,641
65,685
740,097
372,385
543,650
986,156
363,060
1,380,554
163,377
1,548,434
521,610
1,222,349
531
1,119,137
-
2,226,962
851,633
867,500
652,264
589,100
50,246,838
RELEASES TO
SURFACE
WATER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
0
500
0
0
0
470
0
0
0
0
8,294
266
0
0
82
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
9,862
Production - Automotive News, 1995 Market Data Book; production for Chrysler plants provided by Chrysler
* Includes fugitive air releases, stack air releases, and surface water discharges.
TOTAL
RELEASES*
601.383
652,146
1,285,570
1,019,939
1.149,031
361,426
1,229,518
372,894
1.088,600
992,040
963,570
148,229
1,022,555
536,194
1,361,095
1,059,295
679,046
1,323,912
464.109
31,077
2,452,875
2,046,534
2,043,050
699,829
1,178,513
486,722
1,144.409
1,076,520
142,571
1,072,865
968,999
2,142,449
1,238,158
729,751
2,337.617
1,066,540
2,719,951
71,540
776,943
394,264
561,650
998,984
491,710
1,430,765
213,040
2,340,226
526,146
1,354,112
1,242
1,170,980
.
2,428,785
1,072,482
1,081,455
675,648
744,497
56,223,451
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-18
-------
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) CHEMICALS
1994 RELEASES and TRANSFERS (Ibs/year)
7/15/97
DISCHARGE
TOPOTW
1,544
182,282
0
52,903
27,367
3,091
62,960
0
20,750
1,040
250
353
1,755
80,303
115,320
585
4,075
63,970
85,282
0
1,953
496
23,152
496
983
3,237
155
150,250
19,625
33,860
36,130
32,059
114,101
103,190
36,488
161,283
52,260
3,370
31,210
941
250
46,981
1,030
33,150
116,350
8,207
0
73,858
0
1,472
-
8,064
9,680
2,350
19,550
11,320
1,841,331
OFF-SITE
ENERGY
RECOVERY
12,326
•31,564
0
406,365
11,321
44,032
6,940
0
49,750
136,850
188,500
0
141,660
166,897
33,970
399,055
0
0
15,505
377
1,890
6,959
172,474
0
116,755
25,699
132,600
0
117,290
82,715
134,412
301,010
210
0
767,515
24,985
70,750
53,950
0
159,636
426,100
28,773
450,695
365,800
15,974
1,803,513
244,000
10,267
581
336,812
-
6,016
2,891
281,740
80,965
0
7,868,089
OFF-SITE
RECYCLING
1.224,150
567,964
1,033,516
555,917
1,537,430
9,988
914,600
1,828,258
777,550
684,000
505
0
2,687,015
1,169,000
1,552,690
0
334,407
1,283,673
669,809
59,944
589,652
629,646
331,465
379,000
38,324
21,855
0
868,600
207,784
1,173,667
724,800
1,065,815
972,500
1,229,200
2,299,200
284,621
1,293,200
0
1,033,770
25,787
210,200
1,321,870
230,700
641,801
103,745
3,053
401.000
291,353
1
821,453
-
752,305
798,077
295,300
1,495,169
1,355,241
38,780,570
OFF-SITE
TREATMENT
2,300
22,300
174,079
57,052
85,000
15,478
17
81,867
12,750
71,600
1,260
129,197
97,890
1,610
0
15
5,500
10,865
49,855
0
32,950
2,780
5,774
0
2,551
135
1,300
100,055
14,477
44,818
4,519
26,530
70,155
0
0
12,062
0
270
0
1,909
0
18,443
2,280
0
1,593
9,877
0
38,946
0
0
-
0
1,723
0
0
0
1,211,782
OFF-SITE
DISPOSAL
43,267
27,769
2,557
0
55,431
20,264
23,000
0
522,405
0
8,700
4,844
1,760
28,650
29,125
2,415
23,874
15,620
840
0
0
15,868
783
31,850
38,901
2,515
2,261
16,350
0
2,800
26,200
19,253
15,200
14,610
64,364
78,411
24,700
270
19,000
14,220
1,000
30,540
35,110
44,201
65,916
130,058
1.380
2
0
5,269
-
38,902
128,631
9,485
17,700
133,380
1,839,651
TOTAL
TRANSFERS-
1,283,587
831,879
1,210,152
1,072,237
1,716,549
92,853
1,007,517
1,910,125
1,383,205
893,490
199,215
134,394
2,930,080
1,446,460
1,731,105
402,070
367,856
1,374,128
821,291
60,321
626,445
655,749
533,648
411,346
197,514
53,441
136,316
1,135,255
359,176
1,337,860
926,061
1,444,667
1,172,166
1,347,000
3,167,567
561,362
1,440,910
57,860
1,083,980
202,493
637,550
1,446,607
719,815
1,084,952
303,578
1,954,708
646,380
414,426
582
1,165,006
-
805,287
941,002
588,875
1,613,384
1,499.941
51,541,423
TOTAL AIR
EMISSIONS
(Ibs/vehlcle)
1.7
3.0
5.6
8.2
4.2
1.5
4.4
2.2
4.8
6.4
7.0
5.8
3.6
4.2
3.7
5.1
3.1
6.7
1.8
0.9
11.9
8.3
14.1
2.6
5.1
2.3
5.5
3.1
1.7
3.8
3.1
10.7
6.9
3.5
5.7
3.7
12.6
?
4.8
2.5
4.1
6.5
3.6
3.1
0.9
6.5
4.0
3.0
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
(Ibs/vehlcle)
3.5
3.8
5.2
8.6
6.2
0.4
3.6
11.3
6.0
5.8
1.4
5.3
10.3
11.3
4.7
1.9
1.7
6.9
3.1
1.8
3.0
2.7
3.7
1.5
0.8
0.3
0.7
3.2
4.2
4.7
3.0
7.2
6.5
6.5
7.7
1.9
6.7
?
6.7
1.3
4.7
9.4
L 5.2
2.4
1.3
5.4
5.0
1.4
[included with Toledo #1]
4.4
-
5.5
3.8
6.2
3.7
3.1
4.6
" Includes discharges to POTWs and off-site transfers for energy recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal.
4.3
-
1.8
3.4
3.4
8.9
6.3
4.2
*** From all TRI reporters within 3-mile radius of assembly plant (includes assembly plant); see Part III Plant-Community Profiles.
- Not applicable ? Not available I |
TOTAL RELEASES
SOURCES W/IN
3 MILE RADIUS'"
648,600
748,638
1,437,600
1,137,886
1,596,795
480,208
1,658,538
372,644
1,088,600
993,096
2,187,069
178,688
1,022,555
536,194
1,410,348
1,088,960
843,239
1,563,419
472,121
2,551,797
2,568,579
2,046,784
2,359,505
1,166,243
1,196,799
2,800,426
2,799,926
1,776,823
405,787
1,437,846
3,186,262
3,186,262
1,268,851
783,753
2,337,617
1,185,628
3,192,554
71,540
1,118,293
1,429,001
561,650
998.984
534,310
1,430,765
213,040
2,340,231
1,061,201
2.140,645
1,242
2,819,587
-
2.656,024
1.072,482
1,268,646
962,248
844,535
77,241,064
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-19
-------
VOC EMISSIONS
1990-1994
7/15/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp
Ford Motor Company
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefterson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
3eneral Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont
OE, Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL. Belvidere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD. Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ. Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH. Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC.Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX. Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
VOC EMISSIONS (Ibs/year)*
1990| 1991
1,866.240
NA
1,398,000
1.540,000
2,170,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.422.000
715,348
4,237.118
1.122.000
4,050,000
2,394,000
NA
1,188,120
NA
NA
1,038,250
3,524,228
3,731,342
4.288,198
4.815,836
1,404.386
4.277.028
2,373.736
NA
NA
1,293,940
2,206,672
1,729,722
NA
3,444,000
NA
3.202,000
4.290.000
587,480
1.457,360
1.604,000
1,864,580
826,280
1.226.820
2,059.700
6,509.660
2,776,320
NA
NA
2,510,240
NA
3.348,000
822.000
2.105,902
3,028,000
NA
2,239,920
NA
NA
1.663,600
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.290,000
606,284
4,452,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.123,330
74,228
NA
1.413,662
3.576,638
1.391,356
2.959.382
4.582.474
1,106.284
2,137,200
2.033,534
1,174,772
2,438,640
873.626
568.958
791,672
1,073,460
NA
3,438,000
2,884,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.386,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
2,438.000
NA
•Actual or estimated emissions based on facility reports or state calculations based on operating data prow!
Data reported in tons converted to Ibs. (1 ton = 2,000 lbs.)|
SOURCE: State air pollution control agencies. Chrysler data provided by Chrysler.
1992
NA
1.837.000
1,394.000
1.338.000
2,890,000
1,676.620
3,247.380
1.838,980
NA
NA
1,526.000
803,070
5,036,590
NA
NA
2.358,000
1,905,800
916.948
1,128,000
NA
1,017,250
3,412,312
1,014.658
2.574,474
4.198.708
764,964
2,862,800
1,995,310
1.481.000
2,767,000
873.406
568,958
653.228
2,163,240
4,234,000
2.835,000
3,226,000
2,862.000
NA
NA
582,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.368.400
NA
NA
NA
1.913,405
2.582,000
1.400,000
ed by facility
1993
1,476,920
2,321,340
1,788,000
1,626.000
3,252,000
719,000
2.007,640
2.035,600
1,537,200
2,803,200
1.886,000
874,704
4,187,946
1.140,000
4,880.000
1,790.000
2.156.000
1,327,188
1.402,000
26,522
2.840,682
2,516,654
2,788,628
2,817,166
1.877,728
838,224
2,450,048
3.029.012
2.049,000
2.701.000
1,888.482
841.820
1,100,808
1,175,620
5,154,000
2.435,000
3.158,960
2,188.000
1,162,700
732.140
1,418,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.126.020
NA
3,642.000
822,011
2,296.616
2.S22.000
1.737.000
1994
1,947.280
2,180,000
2,404,000
2,098,000
3,382,000
1,065,580
2,955,460
2.125.640
2,957,467
2,056,511
2,122.000
1.065.810
4,991,238
1.132,000
3,014,000
2,238,000
2.413.200
2.292,464
1,478,000
16,122
4,454,164
2,863.982
2,997,270
3,479,218
3.348.834
1.090,324
2,862,728
3,303,210
386,000
3.322,000
1,888,042
1.868,278
1,482,374
835,160
5.214,000
3,702.000
3,172,220
12,000
1,407,860
1,785,740
1.528,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3,469,600
NA
2,910.000
NA
2.150,372
4,042.000
2.570.400
Notes
ROG (reactive organic gases); 1 994 - draft value
1990 'adjusted— (1993 unadj. = 2,322.000)
1990 & 1993 "adjusted™ (1993 unadj. = 1.774,000)
1990 -est
VOM (volatile organic materials)
VOM (volatile organic materials)
VOM (volatile organic materials)
1993 -est.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 .
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current
Attempts nave been made to verify data, but emirs may still exist
11-20
-------
NOx EMISSIONS
1990-1994
7/15/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
38
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
55
56
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co. <
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp. (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Bulck City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
-ord Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
-ord Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Fort Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (MarysvUle)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
:ord Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA. Fremont
DE. Newark
D6. Wilmington
GA, Ooraville
GA. Hapevllle
IL. BeMdere
IL, Chicago
IL. Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY, Loulsvtne
LA. Shreveport
MO, Baltimore
Ml. Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml. Flint
Ml. Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Pontiac
Ml. Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Whom
MN. St. Paul
MO. Ctaycomo
MO. St. Louis
MO. St. Louis
MO. Wentzville
NJ. Edison
NJ. Linden
NY. N. Tarrytown
OH. Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Loraln
OH. Lordstown
OH. Marysville
OH. Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC.Greer
TN. Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl. JanesvlDe
NOx EMISSIONS (tons/year)*
1990
98.000
NA
164,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
116,000
13.812
149.450
44,000
228.000
130.000
NA
45.094
NA
NA
641.928
8,120
814.496
130.180
779,392
113.196
5.118
869,140
NA
NA
370.000
73.478
371,392
NA
260,000
NA
28.000
658.000
628,740
269,600
276,000
20.080
NA
247,560
NA
NA
73,240
NA
NA
206.940
NA
344,000
88.000
166.305
18.000
NA
1991
117.200
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100,000
17,852
176.586
NA
NA
NA
NA
30.880
0
NA
2.080.226
9.284
801.826
153.240
783.560
106.144
6.010
829.440
243.000
353.000
44,894
73,478
404,776
73,560
NA
331,000
20.000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
248,880
NA
NA
NA
NA
14.000
254,800
•Actual or estimated emissions based on faculty reports or state calculations based on operating data provtd
Data reported in tons converted to Ibs. (1 ton = 2,000 Ibs.)
SOURCE: State air pollution control agencies. Chrysler data provided by Chrysler.
1992
NA
125.000
164.000
74.000
77,760
177.000
NA
35,820
NA
NA
92.000
15.622
138.050
NA
NA
82,000
315.600
34,396
120,000
NA
1.000,588
9.284
873,596
213,056
1,607.486
115.242
66.078
746.720
303,000
390,000
NA
73.478
160.578
144,760
252,000
318,000
92,000
584.000
NA
NA
236,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
260,640
NA
NA
NA
108,941
18,000
320.400
ed by facility.
1993 | 1994
149.600
183,520
234,000
78,000
54.600
214.000
NA
151.400
203.200
100.600
136.000
19.140
159.094
68.000
244.000
96.000
294,800
49,742
125,000
NA
1.975.572
9.284
936.278
110.240
859,910
90.924
32.380
716,880
331,000
303,000
120,660
48,166
183.952
95,220
268,000
230,000
88.580
528,000
132,040
238.260
228,000
NA
NA
'' NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
288.460
NA
548.000
88,200
128.159
54.000
289,600
62.200
189.000
244,000
80,000
72,880
160,000
70,253
151.400
219.386
112.840
158.000
13.840
245,284
106,000
210.000
200,000
289.400
151,564
126,000
NA
1,963,416
9,284
862,758
136,952
971.430
123,814
86,458
541,540
324,000
491,000
127,420
300
160,372
89.160
240.000
100,000
106,040
294,000
129,320
569.680
248.000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
305.140
NA
358,000
NA
159.380
52,000
271,800
Notes
1994 - draft value
1994-estNO2
1994 - NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2; 1990-est.
NO2
N02
NO2
1993-est. NO2
NO2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-21
-------
CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT ATTAINMENT STATUS
OF ASSEMBLY PLANT LOCATIONS
(as of 1994)
7/15/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors Corp.
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE & CITY
CA, Fremont,
DE. Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL. Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD. Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml. Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Ponliac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
' MN, St. Paul
MO. Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH. Lordstown
OH. Marysville
OH. Moraine
OH. #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN. Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl. Janesville
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
Newcastle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook .
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore
.Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Ma comb
Ma comb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
St. Louis
St. Louis
SL Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
Tnjmbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Green Rock
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
OZONE
NA-Moderate*
NA-Severe
NA-Severe
NA-Serious
NA-Serious
U/A
NA-Severe
U/A
U/A
U/A
A (Maintenance)
U/A
Marginal"
NA-Moderate
NA-Moderate
U/A
NA-Severe
NA-Moderate®
NA-Moderate@
NA-Moderate@
NA-Moderate@
NA-Moderate@
NA-Transitional
NA-Transitional
NA-Moderate®
U/A
U/A
NA-Moderate®
NA-Moderate®
NA-Moderate®
NA-Moderate®
NA-Moderate®
NA-Moderate®
U/A
U/A
NA-Moderate
NA-Moderate
NA-Moderate
NA-Severe
NA-Severe
NA-Severe
NA-Moderate*
U/A
NA-Moderate*
Marginal •*
U/A
NA-Moderate"
NA-Moderate++
NA-Moderate++
U/A
U/A
NA-Moderate
U/A
NA-Moderate
NA-Marginal
U/A
CO
NA-Moderate
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
NA-Moderate%
NA-Not Classified
NA-Not Classified
NA-Not Classified
NA-Not Classified
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
NA-Not Classified
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
NA-Moderate
NA-Moderate
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
U/A
PM10
U
u
U
u
u
u
NA-Moderate
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
NA-Moderate ##
NA-Moderate ##
NA-Moderate ##
NA-Moderate W
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U/A
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
LEAD
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
N02
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A •
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
CBC/A
SO2
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
NA-Primary
NA-Primary
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Data sources used were not always complete or current
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist
II-22
-------
NOTES FOR ATTAINMENT STATUS
See Appendix H for definitions of attainment classifications.
A = Attainment
CBC/A = Cannot be classified or better than national standards
NA = Nonattainment
U = Unclassifiable
UA = Unclassifiable/Attainment
Redesignated attainment effective 6/21/95 (60 FR 27028)
** Redesignated attainment effective 11/13/95 (60 FR 47009)
@ Redesignated attainment effective 4/6/95 (60 FR 12459)
+ Redesignated attainment effective 5/7/96 (61 FR 20458)
++ Redesignated attainment effective 8/1/95 (60 FR 39115)
A Redesignated attainment effective 7/5/95 (60 FR 22289)
AA Redesignated attainment effective 4/1/96 (61 FR 3319)
## Redesignated attainment effective 10/4/96 (61 FR 40519)
% - Redesignated attainment effective 12/15/95 (60 FR 55326)
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-23
-------
RCRA WASTE SUMMARY FOR U.S. AUTO AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANTS
7/16/97
Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report, 1991 and1993
(short tons)
NAME
1 NUMMI
2 Chrysler Corp.
3 General Motors
4 General Motors
5 Ford Motor Co.
6 Chrysler Corp.
7 Ford Motor Co.
8 Diamond Star
9 General Motors
10 Subaru-lsuzu
11 General Motors
12 General Motors
13 Toyota Motor Mfg.
14 Ford Motor Co.
15 Fort) Motor Co.
16 General Motors
17 General Motors
IB Ford Motor Co.
1 9 Chrysler Corp.(Jefrerson N)
20 General Motors
21 General Motors
22 Auto Alliance InO.
23 General Motors
24 General Motors (Buick City)
25 General Motors
26 General Motors
27 General Motors
28 General Motors
29 Chrysler Corp.
30 Chrysler Corp.
31 Ford Motor Co.
32 Ford Motor Co.
33 Ford Motor Co.
34 Ford Motor Co.
35 Ford Motor Co.
36 Chrysler Corp.
37 Ford Motor Co.
38 General Motors
39 Ford Motor Co.
40 General Motors
41 General Motors
42 Ford Motor Co.
43 Honda
44 Ford Motor Co.
45 General Motors
46 Honda (Marysville)
47 General Motors
48 Chrysler Corp.
49 Chrysler Corp.
50 General Motors
51 BMW Manufacturing
52 NUsan Motor Mfg.
53 General Motors (Saturn)
54 General Motors
55 Ford Motor Co.
56 General Motors
STATE. CITY
CA, Fremont,
OE. Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA. Doraville
GA. Hapevilto
IL. Bervidere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY. Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD. Baltimore
Ml. Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml. Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Pontiac
Ml. Sterling Heights
Ml. Warren
Ml. Wayne
Ml. Wayne
Ml.Wuom
UN, St Paul
MO. Clayoomo
MO. St Louis
MO. SL Louis
MO, WenttvOto
NJ, Edison
NJ, Unden
NY, N. Tanytown
OH. Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH.Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH. tl Toledo
OH. K Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC.Greer
TN. Smyrna
TN. Spring HO
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
WASTE COOES *
0001 .002,005,006,007,008,009.01 8,021 ,035.039.F001, 002,003,005; D027. 040
D001. 008, 01 1, 035, 039, F002. 003
OOO). 002, 008, 0(8, 035, 039, F003
D03S, F003, 005; D001, 008; F006
DO03. 006, 007, F002; D002, F003, 005; D001
DOI8. 039, FOO2, FOOS; DO01, 002. 006, 007. 001, F003; U151
00)8. 039, D001; FOOL 005
O002, 006, 009, FOOS, UO07; D001, 008. 018, 028, 040. F003
DOOf, 008, FOOS, 005
DOtB, U122, 154; D001, 002, 008, 008, 009. 018, F001, F003; D007
DO01, 003. 005. 006, 007, 008, FOO3. 005
DOOS. 007, 008, FOOS; D001. 002, F002, 003; D006
D006. 022. 030, 034, 036. 040, 043; D001. 002, 003, 005, 007, 008, 009, 015, 018, 021, 035. F002, 003. 005; D004, 01 1. 012. 039
O002. 035; D001, 007, 008. 009, F003, 005; D018. F001
D009; D001, 006, 008, 018, 039, F003, 005; D007
Door.ooa.nxo.oos
DOOf, 002, 006, 008, 0(8, 035, 039, FOOf, 002, 003, 005
D007, 027. 035, 039, 040, D001. 008, 018. FOOJ. 005; 0006
D035; D001, 008, FOOJ; D002. 007
7
D009, 043; D001. 008, 035. FOOJ. 005; DOOS, F002
D001.00S.F001.00J.005; DOOS
D040; D001, 008, F002, 003, 005; F001, P012. 016, 029. 098. 108. U151
O005. 009, 011, 027, 039. 040, IABP. POOS, PO2S, U051, 052, 225; 0001, 006, 007, 008, 018, 035, FOOJ, 005; F001, 002, U121
D039. 040; D001, 006, 008. 010, 035, F002, 003; DOOS, 007
D003, 011, 023, 025, 026. 039, t/080, 2(0. 226, P106; D001, 002, 005, 006, 007, 008, 009. 018, 035. F001, 002. 003, 005; U240
O0((. 027, 036,' D001, 002, 005. 006, 007, 008, 010, 018. 022, 029, 035. 039, 040, F002. 003, 005; DOM. 031. F001, P059
DOOS. 035, FOOf. 005; D001, 008, 018, FOOJ
D001,006.008,F002,003,OOS
D009. D001, 005, 007, 018, 032, 035, 039. FOOJ; D002. 008. F002. FOOS
F003; D001, 008
DO01.0O2.010.FOO3
D001.008,01B.039,F001,OOS,006
DOOf.OOS, 006, 008, 009,0(8. 039.RM3, 005
DOOf,003,005.006,008,RW2,008
DOOf,002,008,009,/=003,OOS
0001,002,01 8.035, 039,F003,OOS
DO01,003. 006, 007,008, Of 8, FOOS, 005
OOOf,008.0f8,035,RM3,R>05
DOOf ,«», 006, 007,008. OfO.Of 8, 039.RW3, 005, Of 17
OO01,OOa,OO9,039,F003
DOOS, 006. 007, 035; DM1, 008, 009, 016. 039, F002, 003, 005; DOW. FOOt
F001; D001, 008, 039. F002. 003. 005; 0009. 018. 035
D001,002,005,006,007.F001.002; 0039. F003, 005
D001,002.008,007,008,009,039,F003.F005; D027. 035, 036
0001,OOa.039.F002,003.00S
DOOS. 007, 018; D001, 008, 039, FOOJ, 005
D001.006,007,008,009,018,021,027,039,040,F001 .002,003.005
0006, 007. 008, 009, FO03, 005; D001, 018, 039, F002
D001,008,008,016,039,040,F002,003,005
Not operating in 1994
DOTS, FOOS; D001, D008. FOOS; DOOS. 007. F001
D001, 008. 018, 035, F002. 003. 005, P022
1991 DATA) DOOt, 007,008,009,01 8.F003
D001,018,039,F002,003,005; DO06. 007
DO06; D001, 008, F003, 005; D002, F002, U151
* Waste codes not included for wastes generated in less than one ton/year
Plants 3. 9. 11. 16. 17, 32. 34-41. and 46 - 1993 waste codes only
• - Includes shipment to off-site facilities for recycSng, energ
Bold • waste code appeara in 1993 and 1991
Plain text - waste code appears in 1991 onry
One short ton - 2000 IDS. I- Not applicable
y recovery, treatment, or Disposal.
rntScizad - waste code appear* in 1993 only
7 Not available
1991 TONS
GENERATED
916
497
1,448
722
668
436
595
1,219
39,261
943
422
284
2,877
751
1,356
757
46,208
954
101
7
2,317
862
3,093
739
1,375
1,061
3,840
1.035
369
978
757
536
3,118
579
1,430
1,006
119
460
429
106
918
975
711
778
1.423
?
2.566
551
5
891
.
730
1,291
918
' 130
624
137.142
1991 TONS
SHIPPED1
918
497
1.428
722
868
436
595
1.216
702
943
423
284
2.502
751
1.358
757
600
954
292
7
2.313
866
3,093
739
1.375
1.055
3.843
1,035
369
978
757
536
3.118
580
1,430
1,000
119
460
429
106
918
975
711
778
1,423
?
2,566
551
5
696
1,267
1.281
885
130
624
53X38
1993 TONS
GENERATED
1,168
675
34,176
634
962
453
695
1,053
735
695
336
266
3.776
1,545
1,351
559
79.665
964
644
7
1.454
685
2,188
370
1,052
306
762
1.325
678
633
700
1,004
3,276
965
1,996
415
1,015
376
676
6.392
17,378
1,618
603
982
438
?
2.818
599
15
1,010
-
1,441
766
532
716
5,259
191,198
1993 TONS
SHIPPED*
1,194
675
1,034
634
485
453
695
1,053
735
895
337
266
2,526
1,545
1,351
559
983
984
644
?
1,444
685
2.210
370
1,055
309
764
1,325
678
633
700
1,004
3.276
965
1,998
415
1,015
369
678
6,392
681
1.618
803
962
438
7
2.818
599
15
1,010
1.441
763
526
716
5.259
60.977
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current
ItoveriM^Hutc ~~
-------
Summary of 1993 Hazardous Waste Managed
Total for Auto LOT Assembly Plants
(Short tons, by Type of Waste and Management Method)
7/16/97
MANAGEMENT METHOD:
Metals recovery for reuse
Solvents recovery
Incineration
Energy recovery
Fuel blending
Aqueous treatment
Stabilization
Neutralization only
Other treatment
Landfill
Discharge to POTW/sewer
Ship to transfer facility
Unknown/not reported
TOTAL
I
WASTE TYPE:
Ignitable
wastes
(D001)
0
5,097
973
105
515
1,213
81
44
19
0
0
33
960
9,040
Corrosive
wastes
(D002)
122
0
23
0
5
15,892
86
1,055
0
0
0
1
14
17,198
One short ton = 2000 Ibs.; totals may not add due to rounding.
Reactive
wastes
(D003)
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
20
See Appendix E for information on waste types and management methods.
SOURCE: 1993 Biennial Report
Toxic metals
charact. wastes
(D004-D011)
23
32
382
0
154
94,970
12,090
1
107
571
16,697
0
599
125,626
Toxic organic
charact wastes
(D012-D043)
0
250
18
76
294
1
58
0
44
2,326
0
148
128
3,343
Mixed charact
wastes
0
0
1
12
525
0
16
0
3
7
0
1
2
567
Listed
solvents
(F001-005)
0
21,729
1,854
1,774
2,995
0
293
0
768
0
0
2
5,557
34,972
Toxic
CCPS&
Lab Packs
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
TOTAL
145
27,108
3,274
1,967
4,489
112,076
12,624
1,100
941
2,904
16,697
186
7.260
190,771
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-25
-------
COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
7/14/97
1
2
3
4
5
a
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NAME
United Slates
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
-ord Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE. CITY
CA. Fremont
OE. Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA. Hapevllle
IL, BeMdere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY. Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Mt, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml. Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml. Lansing
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml. Wayne
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wlxom
MN. St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO. SL Louis
MO. St. Louis
MO. Wentzvtlle
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY. N. Tarrylown
OH, Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH. Lorain
OH. Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC.Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN. Spring HU
TX, Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl. Janesvtlle
COUNTY
Alameda
Newcastle
Newcastle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tlppecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
St. Louis
SL Louis
St. Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westch ester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
Trumbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
AREA
(sq. miles)
1990
(aa)
3,536.278.1
737.5
426.3
426.3
268.3
528.7
281.4
945.7
1.183.6
657.3
499.8
151.4
545.2
285.2
385.1
385.1
882.1
60.8
614.1
614.1
614.1
614.1
614.1
639.7
639.7
872.7
559.2
559.2
872.7
480.4
480.4
614.1
614.1
872.7
155.8
396.5
507.8
507.8
561.4
310.6
103.3
432.9
492.8
458.5
492.6
615.8
436.7
461.7
340.4
340.4
709.2
811.0
619.0
612.9
863.5
53.8
720.5
TOTAL
POPULATION
1994
(bb)
260,340,990
1.319,460
464.257
464.257
577,772
690.490
34,786
5,141.209
137.579
307.690
134.428
155.072
83.049
26,790
672.310
672,310
246.777
702.979
2.064.819
2.064.819
2.064.819
2.064.819
2.064.819
433,297
433.297
1.142,013
278.426
278,426
1.142.013
728.902
728.902
2.064.819
2,064,819
1.142,013
483,404
163,334
1,005,096
1.005,096
239,288
692,869
496.230
688,945
279,408
44,706
279,408
228.832
35.421
572,137
457.635
457.635
623.752
.237.568
140.701
63.689
1.257.196
241.426
145.958
POPULATION
Per sq. ml.
1994
(cc)
73.6
1,789.1
1,089.0
1.089.0
2.153.5
1.306.0
123.6
5,436.4
116.2
468.1
. 269.0
1.024.3
152.3
93.9
1,745.8
1,745.8
279.8
8.700.2
3,362.3
3,362.3
3,362.3
3.362.3
3.362.3
677.3
677.3
1.308.6
497.9
497.9
1,308.6
1,517.3
1.517.3
3.362.3
3,362.3
1.308.6
3,102.7
411.9
1.979.3
1.979.3
426.2
2.230.7
4,803.8
2,053.5
567.2
97.5
567.2
371.6
81.1
1.239.2
1,344.4
1,344.4
879.5
292.9
227.3
104.2
1.455.9
4,487.5
202.6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
11-26
-------
COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
7/14/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NAME
United Slates
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subam-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.fJertereon N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysvllle)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont
DE, Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA. Ooraville
GA. Hapevffle
IL. BeMdere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY. Louisville
LA. Shreveport
MD. Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml. Flint
Ml. Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Pontlac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml. Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml. Wayne
Ml. Wixom
MN, SL Paul
MO. Claycomo
MO. SL Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ. Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarn/town
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Loraln
OH. Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN. Smyrna
TN. Spring Hill
TX. Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl. Janesville
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
New Castle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
day
St. Louis
St. Louis
St. Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Loraln
Logan
Loraln
Tnjmbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
TOTAL
POPULATION
1990
(bb)
248,709.873
1.279.182
441,946
441.946
545.837
648.951
30.806
5.105.067
129.180
300,836
130.598
161.993
76,673
23.867
664,937
684,937
248.253
736.014
2,111,687
2,111,687
2,111.687
2,111.687
2,111.687
430,459
430.459
430.459
281,912
281.912
1,083,592
717.4OO
717.400
2,111.687
2,111.687
1.083.592
485.765
153.411
993,529
993,529
212.907
671.780
493.819
874.868
271,126
42.310
271,126
227,813
31,969
573.809
482.361
462.381
599.611
228.800
118.570
54.812
1.170.103
261.229
139,510
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS, 1990 (%)
Race or Ethnicity
White
(bb)
80.3
59.8
80.4
80.4
53.6
47.8
95.3
62.8
93.7
87.8
93.4
67.1
90.7
93.0
81.9
81.9
59.0
39.1
57.4
57.4
57.4
57.4
57.4
78.2
78.2
89.6
84.1
84.1
89.6
98.7
98.7
57.4
57.4
89.6
88.0
96.3
84.2
84.2
96.5
81.9
74.4
79.4
89.1
97.3
89.1
92.6
95.8
80.8
82.2
82.2
77.0
78.2
89.2
83.7
78.4
56.7
93.8
Black
(bb)
12.1
17.9
16.5
16.5
42.2
49.9
0.4
25.8
4.3
10.1
2.0
27.5
8.2
6.3
17.1
17.1
40.1
59.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
19.6
19.6
7.2
9.9
9.9
7.2
1.4
1.4
40.2
40.2
7.2
4.7
1.8
14.0
14.0
2.3
8.0
18.8
13.7
' 7.8
1.9
7.8
6.7
3.7
17.7
14.8
14.8
14.7
20.7
9.0
15.7
12.0
39.1
4.8
American Indian,
Eskimo, Aleut
(bb)
0.8
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.5
: 0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
4.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
Allan &
Pacific Islander
(bb)
2.9
15.1
1.6
1.6
3.0
1.3
0.5
3.7
1.3
0.9
3.7
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.4
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.7
0.7
2.3
2.7
2.7
2.3
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
2.3
5.1
0.7
1.4
1.4
0.7
8.7
2.8
3.7
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
1.0
1.1
1.1
2.0
0.8
1.4
0.3
2.5
2.6
0.7
Other Race
(bb)
3.9
6.8
1.3
1.3
1.1
0.9
3.7
7.5
0.6
1.0
0.6
3.6
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
2.6
2.8
0.6
0.2
0.2
1.0
1.0
0.6
1.3
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.3
3.3
3.8
3.1
2.3
0.1
2.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
1.6
1.6
2.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
6.5
1.2
0.5
Hispanic
Origin
(bb.dd)
9.0
14.2
2.7
2.7
2.9
2.1
8.7
13.6
1.3
1.9
1.6
6.8
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.7
1.0
1.0
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.1
2.1
1.8
4.8
4.8
1.8
1.1
1.1
2.4
2.4
1.8
2.9
2.3
1.0
1.0
1.1
8.9
13.7
9.9
5.6
0.4
5.6
0.6
0.5
0.8
3.4
3.4
4.2
0.7
0.8
0.6
12.0
2.9
1.3
Age
75yrs
(bb)
5.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
3.3
4.4
5.1
5.1
4.8
4.8
4.1
5.6
4.8
4.8
5.6
5.6
5.8
5.8
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.1
4.1
4.4
3.7
3.7
4.4
4.8
4.6
4.9
4.9
4.4
5.6
4.0
5.6
5.6
2.7
4.2
6.1
6.4
4.5
6.0
4.5
5.4
4.8
5.0
5.5
5.5
5.1
5.0
3.4
5.7
3.3
4.1
5.6
1
2
3
4
5
a
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
11-27
-------
COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
7/14/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
i M
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
55
56
COMPANY
NAME
United States
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp. (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA. Ooravllle
GA, Hapeville
IL, BeMdere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY. Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml. Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml. Lansing
Ml, Pontlac
Ml. Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wlxom
MN. St. Paul
MO. Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO. St. Louis
MO, Wentzvflle
NJ. Edison
NJ, Linden
NY. N. Tarrytown
OH. Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH. Lorain
OH. Lordstown
OH, Marysvffle
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC.Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN. Spring Hill
TX. Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl, Janesvllle
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
Newcastle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
St. Louis
St. Louis
St. Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westcfi ester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
Tnjmbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
TOTAL
POPULATION
1990
(bb)
248,709,873
1.279.182
441,946
441,946
545.837
648.951
30.806
5.105.067
129,180
300.836
130,598
161,993
76,673
23.867
664.937
664.937
248.253
736.014
2,111.687
2.111.687
2.111.687
2.111.687
2.111,687
430,459
430,459
1,083,592
281,912
281,912
1.083.592
717.400
717.400
2.111.687
2,111,687
1,083.592
485.765
153.411
993,529
993.529
212,907
671,780
493.819
874.866
271,126
42,310
271,126
227,813
31.969
573.809
462,361
462.361
599,611
226.600
118.570
54,812
1,170,103
261.229
139.510
COUNTY RESIDENTS EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT 1990
% Not Completing
High School
(bb, e«, ft)
24.8
18.6
19.4
19.4
16.1
22.2
24.5
26.6
15.3
18.8
14.8
30.1
29.1
30.9
25.9
25.9
26.6
39.3
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
23.2
23.2
15.4
16.1
16.1
15.4
23.1
23.1
30.0
30.0
15.4
15.0
15.3
17.7
17.7
16.7
20.6
24.8
19.0
24.7
25.5
24.7
24.8
23.8
22.2
23.8
23.8
20.9
37.0
26.1
34.8
20.1
27.3
21.8
% Completing
High School or More
(bb.ff)
75.2
81.4
80.6
80.6
83.9
77.8
75.5
73.4
84.7
81.2
85.2
69.9
70.9
69.1
74.1
74.1
73.4
60.7
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
76.8
76.8
84.6
83.9
83.9
84.6
76.9
76.9
70.0
70.0
84.6
85.0
84.7
82.3
82.3
83.3
79.4
75.2
81.0
75.3
74.5
7S.3
75.2
76.2
77.8
76.2
76.2
79.1
63.0
73.9
65.2
79.9
72.7
78.2
% Completing
College or More
(bb.ff)
20.3
28.8
25.2
25.2
32.7
31.6
12.0
22.8
29.0
19.0
30.7
10.3
.19.2
15.2
19.3
19.3
18.2
15.5
13.7
13.7
13.7
13.7
13.7
12.8
12.6
30.2
29.2
29.2
30.2
13.5
13.5
13.7
13.7
30.2
28.8
20.0
29.2
29.2
21.2
26.5
25.0
35.3
12.3
6.9
12.3
11.4
12.0
20.0
17.0
17.0
22.6
14.3
18.7
12.1
24.0
16.8
13.3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
38
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44 '
45
46
47.
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
11-28
-------
COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
7/14/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
IB
20
21
22
23
24
. 25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NAME
United States
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Aulo Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Bulck City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (MarysvUle)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE. CITY
CA, Fremont
DE. Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA. Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL. Betvtdere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY. Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD. Baltimore
Ml. Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Lansing
Ml. Pontiac
Ml. Sterling Heights
Ml. Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml. Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO. SL Louts
MO. Wentzvllle
NJ. Edison
NJ. Unden
NY. N. Tarrytown
OH. Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH. Loraln
OH. Lordstown
OH, MarysvtOe
OH, Moraine
OH. #1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC. Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN. Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
COUNTY
Alameda
Newcastle
New Castle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tlppecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo .
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee .
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Ma comb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
day
SL Louis
St. Louis
St. Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Loraln
Logan
Loraln
TrumbuQ
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
COUNTY RESIDENTS INCOME LEVEL AND EMPLOYMENT
Per Capita Personal
Income
(dollars)
1989
(aa, gg, hh)
17,690
20,558
20,774
20,774
20,057
24,236
17,309
20,131
17,110
18.312
14,472
12,916
14,162
14,704
17.985
17,985
14.759
17,078
17,104
17,104
17,104
17.104
17.104
16.165
16.165
26.193
16.281
16.281
26,193
19,557
19,557
17,104
17,104
26.193
19.489
18.041
23.705
23.705
17.877
22,392
24,568
30,785
15,441
14.097
15.441
16.421
16.815
17,748
17.324
17.324
16.661
14.597
15.454
13.505
17.491
14.360
15,809
Per Capita Personal
Income
(dollars)
1993
(aa.gg.li)
20.800
24,234
24.320
24.320
22.973
29.823
18.732
23,983
20.238
21.498
17,936
15.465
17.476
18.410
22,372
22.372
18.775
20,182
19,912
19,912
19.912
19.912
19.912
19.139
19.139
29.781
19.464
19,464
29,781
22.691
22,691
19,912
19,912
29.781
23.826
20.345
28.186
28.186
20.057
25,771
28.659
35,945
18.200
17,740
18.200
19,262
19.003
20,713
20,188
20,188
19,587
17.484
18.498
17.275
21.501
17.198
19.233
Median Household Income
Total
(dollars)
1989 (bb)
30,056
37.544
38,617
38.617
35,721
29.978
35.103
32.673
31.366
31.835
27.630
23.780
24.175
27.563
27,092
27.092
22,395
24,045
27,997
27,997
27,997
27.997
27.997
31,030
31,030
43,407
30,162
30,162
43,407
38.931
38.931
27.997
27.997
43,407
32.043
34.370
38.127
38,127
40.307
45,623
41,791
48,405
31,098
26,857
31.098
28.186
33.244
30.111
28.245
28.245
26.129
26,941
30,878
26.238
32.335
23.563
30.632
Pet Change
1979-1989
(bb.JJ)
6.5
19.8
17.2
17.2
7.3
27.9
1.0
1.6
0.9
-0.5
0.4
-8.2
2.5
7.9
-3.0
-3.0
-13.1
12.0
-10.3
-10.3
-10.3
-10.3
-10.3
-11.8
-11.8
2.3
-0.5
-0.5
2.3
-4.1
-4.1
-10.3
-10.3
2.3
0.9
-2.5
2.8
2.8
7.3
19.3
15.3
27.1
•8.9
8.3
-8.9
-13.9
13.6
1.9
-4.9
-4.9
-5.3
6.5
15.7
6.3
3.5
12.4
-4.6
Pet Below
Poverty Level
(families)
1989 (bb, kk)
10.0
8.1
5.0
5.0
7.2
15.4
5.7
11.1
5.9
5.6
6.8
13.9
13.3
12.4
10.9
10.9
19.1
17.8
16.9
16.9
16.9
16.9
16.9
14.0
14.0
4.4
11.0
11.0
4.4
4.0
4.0
16.9
16.9
4.4
8.1
4.2
4.0
4.0
3.5
3.4
5.3
4.7
9.1
8.1
9.1
9.4
5.7
9.8
12.0
12.0
11.3
8.8
7.6
11.0
8.2
15.1
7.8
Total
Employment
(Civilian labor force)
1994 (bb)
131,056,000
686,656
248,779
248.779
346.016
368,741
17.955
2.624,956
78,167
172,822
71.755
79.816
44,761
13,958
363,151
363.151
115.473
319,075
929,642
929,642
929.642
929.642
929.642
202.337
202.337
624.067
149.806
149,806
624,067
396,979
396.979
929.642
929.642
624,067
282,876
93,051
543.371
543,371
127,252
376.993
255.949
438.027
134.091
23,547
134,091
111.244
15.706
283,954
229,109
229,109
310,445
126,252
75,653
36,559
703,579
96.849
75.770
Unemployment
Rate(%>
(Civilian labor force)
1994 (bb)
6.1
6.2
4.7
4.7
5.2
5.6
6.1
5.9
3.5
4.5
3.6
8.3
3.8
3.6
4.8
4.6
7.4
8.7
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
7.7
7.7
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.3
5.6
5.6
6.5
6.5
4.3
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.8
5.8
7.2
4.9
5.8
4.8
5.8
7.3
4.5
4.9
5.8
5.8
5.1
4.6
3.3
4.5
S.S
6.4
5.2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
38
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
48
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
11-29
-------
COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
7/14/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
58
COMPANY
NAME
United States
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.fJetferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Bulck City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE. CITY
CA, Fremont
DE. Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA. Doraville
GA. Hapevflle
IL, BeMdere
IL, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY. Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY. Louisville
LA. Shreveport
MD. Baltimore
Ml. Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml. Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml. Pontiac
Ml. Sterling Heights
Ml. Warren
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml.Wlxom
MN, St. Paul
MO, daycomo
MO. St. Louis
MO. St. Louis
MO, Wentzvtlle
NJ. Edison
NJ, Linden
NY. N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Loraln
OH. Lordstown
OH. Marysville
OH. Moraine
OH. *1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN. Smyrna
TN. Spring Hffl
TX. Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl. JanesviDe
COUNTY
Alameda
Newcastle
Newcastle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scon
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
St. Louis
SL Louis
St. Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westch ester
Loraln
Logan
Loraln
Trumbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartan burg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
EMPLOYMENT IN COUNTY
Total
Employment
1993
(bb, II)
94,789,444
501,857
228,265
228.265
282.420
553,470
9,200
2.314.172
66.614
161,360
51,019
62.726
34.931
11,691
352.412
352.412
99.057
297.523
699.446
699,446
699,446
699,446
i 699.446
152,084
152,084
615.083
123.621
123.621
615.083
284,514
284,514
699.446
699.448
615.063
270.220
• 65.066
516.683
516,683
64,556
321,099
205.342
356.364
83.845
14.096
83,845
81,764
17.066
262.892
195.005
195.005
290,937
102,388
52,430
23,964
479,171
107.289
54.342
Manufacturing
Employment
1993
(bb. II)
18.183,381
81.338
46,864
48,864
31.462
53,505
4.618
440,312
9.293
38,085
15,051
14,534
8,085
6.074
62.608
62.608
15,244
39,246
182,126
182,126
182.126
182,126
182,126
49,494
49.494
104,973
24.790
24,790
104,973
99,437
99,437
182,126
182.126
104,973
61.270
15.262
94.997
94.997
13.490
66,545
49,930
47.084
29.217
4,586
29,217
34.135
9.843
63,129
35,577
35.577
40.935
37,719
19.738
9,709
94.393
12.463
18.187
Mfgr as % Total
Employment
1993
(bb, mm)
19.2
16.2
20.5
21.4
11.1
9.7
50.2
19.0
14.0
23.6
29.5
23.2
23.1
52.0
17.8
17.8
15.4
13.2
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
32.5
32.5
17.1
20.1
20.1
17.1
34.9
34.9
26.0
26.0
17.1
22.7
23.5
18.4
18.4
20.9
20.7
24.3
13.2
34.8
32.5
34.8
41.7
57.7
24.0
18.2
18.2
14.1
36.8
37.6
40.5
19.7
11.6
33.5
Assembly Plant Employment
Total
1994
(nn)
210,376
4.250
3,726
3,104
2,713
2,696
4,063
2.773
3,200
2,830
1,970
3.435J
1.051
6.000
3,237
3,682
2,793
3,836
2.245
4.384
NA
5,083
3,800
5,500
12,699
5,557
7,790
NA
8,040
3.360
4,218
3.781
2.063
3,858
2.063
4.842
5.874
2.393
3,972
1.704
2.975
2.521
3.440
1.800
4.056
8,817
5.300
3.627
5,410 (pp)
5.410 (pp)
4.707
530 (pro])
5.900
7.871
4.193
1.802
4.982
Pet. Of 1993 Mfgr.
Employment
(00)
1.2
5.2
8.0
6.4
8.6
5.0
88.0
0.6
34.4
7.4
13.1
23.6
13.0
98.8
5.2
5.9
18.3
9.8
1.2
2.4
NA
2.8
2.1
11.1
25.7
5.3
31.4
NA
7.7
3.4
4.2
2.1
1.1
3.7
3.4
30.4
6.2
2.5
29.4
2.6
6.0
5.4
11.8
39.2
13.9
25.8
53.8
5.7
15(qq)
15 (qq)
11.5
NA
29.9
81.1
4.4
14.5
27.4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
II-30
-------
SOURCES AND NOTES FOR COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
Sources:
(aa) U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics, and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census. USA Counties 1996.
(bb) Slater, Courtenay M. and George E. Hall, eds. 7996 County and City Extra: Annual Metro, City and County Data Book.
Lanham, MD: Bemam Press, 1996.
Notes: '
NA = Not available
(cc) Calculated by .dividing total persons (1994) by land area (in square miles, 1990). Land area includes dry land and land
temporarily or partially covered by water, such as marshlands and river floodplains.
(dd) Hispanic persons may be of any race.
(ee) Percent not completing high school equals 100 percent minus percent of completing high school or more.
(ff) These values reflect percentages for persons 25 years old or over.
(gg) Per capita personal income consists of wage and salary earnings, including pension rights and employer provided health insurance;
interest income;, rental income; and any business or government transfer payments, such as food stamps or Medicare payments.
(hh) Based on the resident population enumerated as of April 1, 1990.
(ii) Based on the resident population estimated as of July 1, 1993.
(jj) Based on constant 1989 dollars.
(kk) Families are defined as a householder and all relatives living together.
(II) Includes private nonfarm establishments, employment and payroll only. Figures pertain to the pay period including March 12, 1993.
(mm) Calculated by dividing the number of manufacturing employees by the total number of employees.
(nn) See 11-1, Industry-Wide Data: U.S. Auto and Light Duty Truck Assembly Plants.
(oo) Calculated by dividing the number of assembly plant employees (1994) by the total number of manufacturing employees (1993).
(pp) Combined employment of plants #48 and #49.
(qq) Represents the combined employment totals for plants #48 and #49.
Data sources used were not always complete or current. Attempts were made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
n-31
-------
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ASSEMBLY PLANT COMMUNITIES
1990 POPULATION AND POPULATION DENSITY
7/16/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
SO
51
52
53
54
55
66
COMPANY
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-tsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.(Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buk* City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (MatysviOe)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont,
OE. Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Betvidere
IL. Chicago
IL, Normal
IN. Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY. Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY. Louisville
LA. Shreveport
MO. Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml. Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml. Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml, PonSac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Whom
MN, St Paul
MO.CIaycomo
MO. SL Louis
MO, St Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ. Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarn/town
OH. Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordslown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, f 1 Toledo
OH, ri Toledo
OK. Oklahoma
SC. Greer
TN. Smyrna
TN. Spring Hill
TX. Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl. Janesvffle
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
Newcastle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomta
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Ctay
St Louis
St Louis
St Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
TrumbuD
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
SpetrtflnburQ
Ruthttffonl
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
SOURCE: 1990 Census of Population and analysis by EPA Region 4; see Appendbc 1
Population within
3 ml. radius 1990
31,245
48,194
75.394
66,429
45,106
11,539
140,409
8,704
4,010
5,084
35,991
6,135
2,125
34.733
60,709
7,319
154.713
148,078
149.365
194.925
179.460
34,709
77.212
121.252
18,619
988,011
113.204
87.477
91.523
151,734
70,441
65,041
14,618
148,659
25,001
49,805
78,268
9,823
136.604
141,985
35,873
15,231
1,025
8.551
3.349
990
48.660
149.604
na
25.325
6.378
16.475
1.905
89.242
743.302
42.571
Population Density
for 3 ml. radius
1,108
1,709
2.674
2.356
1,600
409
4,979
309
142
180
1,276
218
75
1.232
2,153
260
5,466
5,251
5.297
6.912
6.364
1.231
2.738
4,300
660
35,036
4,121
3.102
3.245
5,381
2.498
2,306
518
5,279
887
1.766
2.705
346
4,851
5,035
1,272
540
36
303
119
35
1.726
5,305
na
898
226
584
66
3.165
26,356
1,510
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-32
-------
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ASSEMBLY PLANT COMMUNITIES
MINORITY PERCENTAGE 1990
7/16/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors i
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp (JefferJon N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buck City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors :
Ford Motor Co. i
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA. Fremont.
DE. Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA. Ooraville
GA. Hapeville
IL. Belvidere
IL. Chicago
IL. Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY. Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY. Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MO, Baltimore
Ml. Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml. Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wlxom
MN. SI Paul
MO. daycomo
MO. St Louis
MO. St Louis
MO. Wentzville
NJ. Edison
NJ, linden
NY. N. Tarrytown
OH. Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH. Lorahi
OH. Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH. Moraine
OH, »1 Toledo
OH. *2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC. Greer
TN. Smyrna
TN. Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl. Janesville
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
New Castle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
SI Louis
SI Louis
SL Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
TrumbuU
Union
Montgomery
|_^^3
|_IIM«
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tsrrant
Norfolk City
Rock
SOURCE: 1990 Census of Population and analysis by EPA Region 4; see Appendix I.
CENSUS
BLOCK
25
9
5
37
46
2
7
0
0
4
0
17
<1
3
0
32
26
1
100
100
0
3
0
75
2
41
53
83
0
2
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
19
23
0
1
0
2
0
5
0
0
54
na
37
0
7
2
0
55
0
CUMULATIVE
0 to 1 Mile
33
9
14
29
31
6
8
3
0
2
0
13
0
15
6
31
9
8
88
98
73
3
5
64
2
44
40
87
2
9
3
3
1
5
3
•0
12
14
10
12
11
2
1
0
4
1
6
40
na
28
5
3
3
31
73
1
CUMULATIVE
0 to J Miles
33
9
21
23
58
6
28
7
1
7
35
6
24
9
10
26
13
27
72
82
82
2
18
51
8
4
25
38
3
39
7
7
2
8
3
2
14
7
12
31
15
1
1
3
3
2
18
34
na
26
14
5
8
26
12
2
CUMULATIVE
1 to 3 Miles
33
9
22
23
60
6
30
7
1
7
35
5
24
8
10
26
14
28
71
81
82
2
19
49
8
4
22
31
3
42
7
7
2
9
2
2
14
6
12
33
16
1
1
3
3
2
19
33
na
26
15
5
8
26
12
2
CUMULATIVE
3 to S Miles
33
10
31
18
67
2
63
8
1
3
27
14
7
5
13
28
57
56
53
82
83
2
38
21
14
3
3
5
3
38
15
14
2
27
3
3
10
5
20
21
31
11
<0.5
7
2
2
29
15
na
19
18
7
8
19
43
1
COUNTY
40
20
20
46
52
5
37
6
12
7
33
9
7
18
18
41
61
43
43
43
43
43
22
22
10
16
16
10
3
3
43
43
10
12
4
16
16
4
18
26
21
11
3
11
7
4
19
18
na
23
22
11
16
22
43
6
STATE
31
20
20
29
29
22
22
22
9
9
10
8
8
8
a
33
29
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
6
12
12
12
12
21
21
26
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
na
16
31
17
17
25
23
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
SO
51
52
S3
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
11-33
-------
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ASSEMBLY PLANT COMMUNITIES
PERCENT OF 1989 HOUSEHOLDS BELOW POVERTY LEVEL FOR 4-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS
7/16/97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
Gen »ral Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp. (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont,
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA. Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL. Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY. Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MO. Baltimore
Ml. Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml. Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarn/town
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH. #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl. Janesville
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
New Castle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
St. Louis
St. Louis
St. Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
Trumbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
CENSUS
BLOCK
0
19
2
13
16
11
7
0
2
10
0
30
23
2
27
22
6
5
41
50
0
19
0
50
10
8
67
44
0
35
13
13
15
56
19
0
0
27
2
0
12
25
10
15
12
18
54
45
na
0
17
21
8
0
70
0
SOURCE: 1990 Census of Population and analysts by EPA Region 4; see Appendix I.
CUMULATIVE
0 to 1 Mile
2
18
16
11
16
22
13
8
2
8
22
26
21
6
18
22
20
37
58
54
53
9
21
49
6
30
46
29
5
22
11
6
13
12
7
10
9
22
6
11
12
10
8
13
14
17
16
24
na
2
18
10
11
20
42
16
CUMULATIVE
0 to 3 Miles
2
11
16
10
27
15
20
13
11
21
24
19
27
6
21
15
20
32
38
50
49
10
28
37
6
3
26
22
6
25
15
15
7
15
7
5
10
12
10
11
10
7
10
17
14
15
16
32
na
9
20
11
13
18
9
9
CUMULATIVE
1 to 3 Miles
2
10
15
9
27
13
20
13
11
22
24
17
27
6
21
14
20
32
36
50
48
10
28
35
6
3
22
21
6
25
16
16
7
15
7
5
10
10
11
11
10
7
10
17
13
14
16
33
na
9
20
11
13
17
8
8
CUMULATIVE
3 to 5 Miles
5
7
14
7
25
5
21
23
7
10
27
35
24
7
22
14
31
33
32
43
44
B
26
23
13
2
2
6
8
29
10
10
4
26
10
5
10
8
11
13
6
19
13
19
13
13
24
24
na
16
24
12
14
13
18
14
COUNTY
15
20
20
13
23
13
19
17
15
15
27
28
24
23
' 23
31
28
26
26
26
26
26
23
23
11
20
20
11
12
12
26
26
11
17
12
11
11
9
10
13
12
18
22
18
21
16
20
23
na
22
22
18
25
16
25
18
STATE
15
15
15
21
21
18
18
18
19
19
21
30
30
30
30
31
13
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
18
23
23
23
23
13
13
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
na
27
24
26
26
23
17
19
1
2
3
4 •
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-34
-------
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ASSEMBLY PLANT COMMUNITIES
PERCENTAGE OF 1990 POPULATION 18 YEARS AND OLDER NOT COMPLETING HIGH SCHOOL
7/1 era?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Company
Diamond Star
General Motors
SubanJ-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp. (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance Intl.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont,
DE, Newark
DE. Wilmington
GA. Doraville
GA. Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
ll_, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml. Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Pontiac
Ml. Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml. Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarn/town
OH. Avon Lake
OH. E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX. Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
New Castle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Macomb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
St. Louis
St. Louis
St. Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
Trumbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
CENSUS
BLOCK
10
e
36
25
39
23
18
31
17
16
0
37
29
3
25
20
44
9
84
30
0
27
0
32
30
14
41
60
17
30
48
48
36
29
20
0
0
29
14
0
8
26
20
11
24
21
48
63
na
19
38
33
29
0
53
0
SOURCE: 1990 Census of Population and analysis by EPA Region 4; see Appendix 1.
CUMULATIVE
0 to 1 Mile
7
3
27
22
35
32
22
21
16
13
14
33
27
6
29
26
42
54
48
42
55
16
18
43
25
24
30
39
21
38
21
18
29
12
14
25
17
26
17
29
20
20
18
13
23
20
22
30
na
11
42
29
34
25
41
21
CUMULATIVE
0 to 3 Miles
12
10
23
13
38
28
32
9
15
18
24
25
33
10
30
16
39
41
36
44
45
18
26
31
15
21
20
26
17
34
25
24
12
12
14
12
19
19
15
28
18
20
18
24
23
20
17
28
na
12
43
25
30
20
34
17
CUMULATIVE
1 to 3 Miles
12
12
22
13
38
27
33
9
15
16
24
24
33
10
30
18
38
41
35
44
45
18
26
30
14
20
19
24
17
34
26
24
11
12
14
12
19
18
15
25
17
20
18
24
23
20
17
28
na
12
44
24
30
20
33
18
CUMULATIVE
3 to 5 Miles
16
14
16
8
29
15
27
11
11
13
21
27
26
9
27
17
36
33
33
43
41
18
22
24
19
10
9
13
18
29
21
21
11
14
14
13
19
20
17
21
15
25
20
23
23
20
20
22
na
19
31
25
29
15
19
19
COUNTY
19
19
19
17
22
25
26
13
19
12
30
26
29
26
26
27
38
30
30
30
30
30
24
24
16
15
15
16
22
22
30
30
16
15
16
18
18
17
20
24
19
25
26
25
24
24
22
23
na
21
36
24
35
21
23
22
STATE
25
22
22
29
29
23
23
23
24
24
19
34
34
34
34
31
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
17
26
26
26
26
23
23
25
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
na
25
31
32
32
28
24
21
1
2 .
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
SO
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verify data, but errors may still exist.
II-35
-------
ASSEMBLY PLANT LOCATION AND ID NUMBERS
7/15/97
1
2
1
4
t
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
COMPANY
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor Mfg.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp. (Jefferson N)
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance InU.
General Motors
General Motors (Buick City)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
..General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda (Marysville)
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW Manufacturing
Nissan Motor Mfg.
General Motors (Saturn)
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE & CITY
CA, Fremont.
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville (Atlanta)
IL. Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL. Normal
IN, Fort Wayne (Roanoke)
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City (Fairfax)
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml. Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml. Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml. Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
: Ml, Lansing (C)
Ml, Lansing (M)
Ml. Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, SL Paul
MO, Claycomo (Kansas City)
, MO. St. Louis (Fenton)
Mo. SL Louis (Hazelwood)
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
. NY, N. Tarn/town
OH, Avon Lake
1 OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH. Marysville
OH. Moraine
OH. #1 Toledo
OH. #2 Toledo
OK. Oklahoma City
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA. Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
ADDRESS
45500 Fremont Blvd
550 S. College Ave
Boxwood & Dodson Rds
3900 Motors Industrial Way
340 Henry Ford II Ave.
3000 W. Chrysler Drive
12600 S. Torrence Ave.
100 N. Diamond Star Pkwy.
12200 Lafayette CtrRd.
5500 State Road 38 East
3201 Fairfax Trafficway
600 Corvette Drive
1001 Cherry Blossom Way
3001 Chamberlain Lane
Fern Valley Rd. @ Grade Ln
7600 GM Blvd.
2122 Broening Hwy.
3001 Miller Road
2101 Conner Ave.
601 Piquette Ave.
2500 E. General Motors Blvd.
1 1nternational Drive
G-3100 Van Slyke Rd.
902 E. Hamilton Ave.
4555 Giddings Road
920 Townsend (Lansing #1)
401 N. Verlinden Ave. (Lansing Body)
820 Opdyke Rd.
38111 Van Dyke
21 500 Mound Road
37625 Michigan Ave.
38303 Michigan Ave.
28801 Wixom Rd.
966 S. Mississippi River Blvd.
Hwy 69
1050 Dodge Dr.
6250 No. Lindbergh Blvd
1500 E. Rte. A
939 U.S. Hwy 1
1016 W. Edgar Rd.
199 Beekman Ave.
650 Miller Rd.
11000 State Route 347
5401 BaumhartRd.
2300 Hallock Young Road
24000 Honda Pkwy.
2601 W. Stroop Rd.
1000 Jeep Parkway
4000 Stjckney Ave.
7447 SE 74th SL
983 Nissan Drive
100 Saturn Pkwy
2525 East Abram SL
2424 Springfield Ave.
1000 Industrial Ave.
ZIP
94538
19714
19804
30360
30354
61008
60633
61761
46783
47905
66115
42102
40324
40241
40213
71130
21234
48121
48215
48202
48211
48134
48551
48550
48359
48921
48901
48342
48312
48091
48184
48184
48393
55116
64119
63026
63042
63385
08818
07036
10591
44012
43319
44053
44481
43040
45439
43612
43657
73125
29334
37167
37174
76010
23523
53545
COUNTY
Alameda
New Castle
New Castle
DeKalb
Fulton
Boone
Cook
McLean
Allen
Tippecanoe
Wyandotte
Warren
Scott
Jefferson
Jefferson
Caddo
Baltimore City
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Wayne
Genesee
Genesee
Oakland
Ingham
Ingham
Oakland
Ma comb
Macomb
Wayne
Wayne
Oakland
Ramsey
Clay
St. Louis
St. Louis
SL Charles
Middlesex
Union
Westchester
Lorain
Logan
Lorain
Trumbull
Union
Montgomery
Lucas
Lucas
Oklahoma
Spartanburg
Rutherford
Maury
Tarrant
Norfolk City
Rock
RCRA I.D.*
CAD000051433
DED002357408
DED002369205
GAD003310810
GAD003305307
.ILD 001874320
ILD 060364882
ILD 982072357
IND1 15304594
IND 984866491
KSD981 126253
KYD 000622993
KYD 161955380
KYD 053351227
KYD 071315899
LA D0893 17341
MDD003091972
MID000809764
MID985569987
MID076380583
MID980795488
MID981953912
MID005356951
MID005356712
MID000718544
M1D005356894
MID005356928
MID005356902
MID980896690
MID005358007
MID005379706
MID000809228
MID005379714
MND006207773
MOD0071 18078
MOD085002319
MOD006272876
MOT300010261
NJD002143782
NJD0021 86690
NYDOO 2026565
OHD020626669
OHD986968204
OHD004227815
OHD020632998
OHD987027828
OHD041063074
OHD 048784862
OHD048784920
OKD082565714
SCD0001 10288
TND054481205
TND981468648
TXD008018004
VAD003 177391
WID059980045
AIRS I.D.*
?
AFS1000300005
AFS 10003000 15
AFS1308900086
AFS1312100364
AFS1700700001
AFS1703101168
AFS17113Z0069
AFS1800360036
AFS1815700050
AFS2020900046
AFS2 122700005
AFS2120900030
AFS21 11 100073
AFS21 11 100072
?
AFS24S1000354
AFS2616300191
AFS2616303677
AFS2616309014
AFS2616303252
AFS261 6303579
?
AFS2604900025
AFS26 12500260
AFS2606500023
AFS2606500035
AFS2612500182
AFS0026590007
AFS2609900107
AFS2616300502
AFS2616300379
AFS0010670010
AFS2712300039
AFS2904700019
?
?
AFS2918300076
AFS3402300044
AFS3403900008
AFS361 1900008
AFS3909300056
AFS3909100010
AFS3909300006
AFS3915500176
AFS0001090010
AFS391 1300150
?
?
AFS4010900044
AFS4 508300230
AFS4714900155
AFS4711900132
?
AFS5171000009
AFS5510500004
NPOES I.D. *
CA0006076
-
DE0000523
GA0001767
GA0001716
-
IL0039802
IL0065269
IN0055689
IN0053996
KS0085626
KY0007954
KY0089508
KY0097454
KY0002658
LA0053694
MD0001163
-
-
-
-
-
MI0001104
MI0001597
MI0042099
-
-
-
MI0000345
MI0048968
MI0046183
MI0003387
MI0028151
MN0002178
MO00004936
MO0000167
MO0004944
MO0100153
NJ0002691
NJ0035947
-
-
OH0 1052 10
OH0001082
-
OH0097039
-
OH0002721
-
OK0035203
-
-
-
TX0094251
VA0004910
WI0000194
TRI*
94538NWNTD45500
19714NWRKS550SO
1 9899CPCWLPOBOX
30360GNRLM3900M
30354FRDMT340HE
61008BLVDR3000W
60633FRDMT12600
61761DMNDS100ND
46783GMCTR12200
47903SBRSZ5500S
66115GMCCP3201F
42101GNRLMI65US
40324TYTMT1001C
40222FRDMT3001C
40213FRDMTFERNV
71130TRCKN7600G
21224GNRLM2122B
48121FRDM23001M
48215CHRYL2101C
48202GMCTR601PI
48211CDLLC2500E
48134 M2DMT1MAZD
4855 1GMCTRG3 100
48550BCFLN902EH
48055GNRLM4555G
48921 BCLNS920TO
48921BCLNS401NO
48058GMCTR820OP
48077STRLN38111
48091WRRNT215OO
48184FRDMT37625
48184FRDMT38303
48096FRDMT50000
55116FRDMT966SM
64119FRDMTHWY69
63026STLSS1050D
63042FRDMT6250N
63358BCGRP1500E
08818FRDMT939US
07036GNRLM1016W
10591GNRLM199BE
44012FRDMT650MI
43319HNDFM11000
44053FRDMTS401B
44482BCLRD2300H
43040HNDFM24000
45439GNRLM2601W
43612CHRYS1000J
43612CHRYS4000S
73134GNRLM7447S
29651BMWN1400H
37167NSSNMNISSA
37174STRNC100SA
76010GNRLM2525E
23523FRDMT2424S
53545GMBC 10001
1
2
3
4
5
. 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
lexist.l
-------
Part III:
Assembly Plant- and
Community-Specific Data
Example for one plant-community. Profiles for additional
plants and their communities can be obtained from:
Keith Mason
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (6103)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 260-5580 (phone)
July 15, 1997
-------
18-33
U.S. Assembly Plants
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
ieneral Motors
icneral Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
ieneral Motors
Subaru-Isuzu
General Motors
ieneral Motors
Toyota Motor
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
See Michigan map
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW
Nissan Motor MFG.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
STATE, CITY
!A, Fremont
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA. Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN. Lafayette
KS. Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA. Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
MI
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma City
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN. Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
WI, Janesville
OH, n Toledo
For MI plants,
see adjoining map
-------
y
'HZH^L
~K
JsL
Michigan Assembly Plants
© 1995 DeLorme
Mag 7.00
Fri Jan 17 14:30 1997
Scale 1:4,000,000 (at center)
50 Miles
100 KM
State Boundary
National Boundary
I Land
Lake, Ocean, Large River
River, Canal
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
NAME
Ford
Chrysler
General Motors
General Motors
A.A.I.
General Motors
GM (Buick)
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler
Chrysler
Ford
Ford
Ford
CITY
Dearborn
Detroit
Detroit
Detroit
Flat Rock
Flint
Flint
Lake Orion
Lansing
Lansing
Ponriac
Sterling Heights
Warren
Wayne
Wayne
Wixom
-------
Plant-Community Profile:
Ford Motor Co.
Hapevllle GA
7/1&97
LOCATION
OPERATIONS
Calendar Year 1991
1992
1993
1994
RCRA BIENNIAL REPORT
Waste Code(s)
1991
0001 (ignitable)
D002 (corrosive)
F003, FOOS (nonhatog. solvents)
FOOS, FOOS (nonhatog. solvents)
TOTAL -1991
1993
D002 (corrosive)
D003 (reactive)
F002. 0006, D007
F003, FOOS (nonhatog solvents)
F003, FOOS (nonhatog solvents)
TOTAL - 1993
TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORY
Total Ibs of TRI chemicals:
1991
1992
1993
1994
Lbs. per vehicle produced:
1991
1992
1993
1994
Address 340 Henry Ford II Ave. Hapeville GA 30354 DESCRIPTION Produced Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable in 1 994.
Lat/Long: latitude (degrees N) 33 39' 6"
longitude (degrees W) 84 24' 9"
County: Fulton MSA: Atlanta GA ID NUMBERS RCRA ID GAD003305307
Other counties within 3 miles of plant: DeKalb, Clayton AIRS ID AFS1312100364
NPDES ID GA0001716
Production Employment TRI 30354FRDMT340HE
210,715
275,232
279,018
275,222 2.696
PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE
Wastewater?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Air-Fugitive
Emissions
215,069
163.033
168,713
46,942
1.02
0.59
0.60
0.17
Physical Form
B203org. liquids
519 tnorg. sludge
B203 org. liquids
B203 org. liquids
502 inorg sludge
B203 org. liquid
B407 org. solids
B203 org. liquid
B203 org. liquid
Air-Stack
Emissions
775,512
1,013,141
988.771
1,102,089
3.68
3.68
3.54
4.00
Source
A04 flush rinsing
A01 stripping
ACM flush rinsing
A04 flush rinsing
A01 stripping
A04 flush rinsing
A01 stripping
A04 flush rinsing
A04 flush rinsing
Total
Releases
990,581
1,176,174
1,157,484
1,149,031
4.70
4.27
4.15
4.17
Mgd. On/Off-Site
Off
Off
Ofl
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Discharge
toPOTW
4,851
5.709
8,040
27,367
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.10
Management Method
M029 solvents recov.
M032 oth. recov.
M029 solvents recov.
M061 fuel blending
M032 oth. recov.
M141 transfer fadl.
MOS1 fuel blending
M029 solvents recov.
M061 fuel blending
Off-Site
Energy Recovery
7,234
9.639
0
11.321
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.04
Quantify
Generated (tons)
0.5
94.0
423.5
349.7
867.6
118.8
0.8
21.2
418.8
402.8
962.5
Off-Site
Recycling
522,167
653,700
990,020
1.537,430
2.48
2.38
3.55
5.59
Quantity Quantity
Shipped (tons) Mgd.
0.5
94.0
423.5
349.7
867.6
1168
0.8
21.2
332.2
11.6
484.7
Off-Site
Treatment
13.008
23,011
34.420
85,000
0.06
0.08
0.12
0.31
On-Site (tons)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Off-Site
Disposal
35,700
42.090
90,430
55,431
0.17
0.15
0.32
0.20
Total
Transfers
582,960
734,149
1.122.910
1,716,549
2.77
2.67
4.02
6.24
-------
Plant-Community Profile:
Ford Motor Co.
Hapeville GA
PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE (continued)
1994 TRI Em/ss/ons/Refeases by Chemical (Ibs.)
Chemical Name
METHANOL
N-BUTYL ALCOHOL
BENZENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
ETHYLBENZENE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CYCLOHEXANE
DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS)
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
BARIUM COMPOUNDS
GLYCOL ETHERS
LEAD COMPOUNDS
MANGANESE COMPOUNDS
ZINC COMPOUNDS
TOTAL
VOC/NOx Emissions:
(Ibs/year)
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
Air-Fugitive
Emissions
1,200
740
21
10,000
520
0
2,000
2,200
1
0
26,000
210
0
1,300
0
2,500
250
48,942
VOCs
2,170,000*
NA
2,890,000
3,252,000
3,382,000
•estimate
Air-Stack
Emissions
49,000
150,000
57
34,000
100,000
0
60,000
8,200
2
0
450,000
560
270
250,000
0
0
0
1,102,089
NOx
NA
NA
77,760
54,600
72.880
Total
Re/eases
50.200
150.740
78
44,000
100,520
0
62,000
10,400
3
0
476,000
770
270
251,300
0
2.500
250
1,149,031
Discharge
toPOTW
0
0
0
0
0
4.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
700
22.000
37
270
360
27.387
Off-Sfte
Energy Recovery
650
1,900
0
440
76
0
270
85
0
0
5.400
0
0
2,500
0
0
0
11.321
Off-Site
Recycling
3,200
9,600
0
2,200
870,000
0
310,000
430
0
0
330,000
0
0
12,000
0
0
0
1,537,430
Off-Site
Treatment
0
0
0
0
0
56.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
29,000
0
0
0
0
85.000
Off-Srte
Disposal
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
320
0
0
28,900
0
210
12,000
14,001
53,431
Total
Transfers
3,850
11,500
0
2.840
870,076
60.000
310,270
515
0
320
335,400
0
58,600
38,500
247
12,270
14,361
1,719,549
-------
Plant-Community Profile:
Ford Motor Co.
Hapeville GA
7/1597
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE
TRI Chemical Releases & Transfers from Sources Within 3 Miles of Auto/LDT Plant (Ibs.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Facility (w. map it)
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
SPENCER COS. INC. S. ICE DIV.
Cl HOLDINGS INC. SSC IND.
GENERAL CHEMICAL CORP. ATLANT
OWENS-BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAI
KEEBLER CO.
SOUTHERN ZINC
CATO OIL & GREASE CO.
TREASURE CHEST ADVERTISING
COCA-COLA USA
TIME PRODS. INC.
AIR TREADS INC. ATLANTA DIV.
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO.
H. B. FULLER CO.
CLOROX CO.
MURPHY & ORR CO.
MERICO INC.
SAMUEL BINGHAM CO.
CARGILL INC. CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
Air-Fugitive
Emissions
9,060
0
5
0
2,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
38,107
0
0
0
0
0
5,669
Air-Stack
Emissions
3,020
0
750
4.455
66.850
83,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
230,914
0
9
0
0
0
3,425
Total
Releases
12.080
0
755
4,455
69.350
83,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
269,021
0
9
0
0
0
9,094
Discharge
toPOTW
0
0
250
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
190
263
0
0
0
32
Off-Site
Transfers
750
0
0
0
340
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
43
470
0
0
0
7,100
163,807
Total
Transfers
750
0
250
0
340
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
48
660
263
0
0
7.100
163,839
Total
55,341
392,423
447,764
745
172,510
173,255
Air Quality Attainment Status
(as of 1994)*
ozone - nonattainment (serious)
carbon monoxide - attainment or unclassifiable
particulates - unclassifiable
lead - unclassifiable
NO2 - cannot be classified or better than national standards
SO2 - attainment
* No changes in status since 1994
-------
Plant-Community Profile:
Ford Motor Co.
Hapevllle GA
7/15/97
COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Census
Block 0-1 Mile 0-3 Miles 1-3 Miles 3-5 Miles
Total Population (1994) NA NA MA NA NA
Total Population (1990) 369 2,481 45.106 42.625 115,053
% Change 1990-1994 NA NA NA NA NA
Land Area (sq. mi.) (1990) <1 3.1 28.2 25.1 50.2
Population/so;, mile (1990) 917 800 1.600 1.698 2,292
Median Household Income (1994)
Median Household Income (1989)
% Change 1979-1989 (constant $)
% Change 1989-1994 (constant $)
Per Capita Personal Income (1993)
Per Capita Personal Income (1989)
% Change 1989-1993 (current $)
Minority Percentage (1990) 46 31 58 60 67
Pet. of Households Below 16 16 27 27 25
Poverty Level (1989)
Pet. Not Completing 39 35 38 38 29
High School (1990)
Total Employment (1994) (civilian nonfarm)
Unemployment Rate (1994)
Manufacturing Employment (1993)
Mfgr. as % Total Employment (1993)
Manufacturing Employment (1992)
Production Workers (1992)
% Change in Mfgr. Employment 1987-1992
Assembly Plant as % Total Mfgr. Workers
County
690,490
648.951
6
528.7
1,227
NA
29,978
28
NA
29.823
24,236
23
52
23
22
368.741
6
53,505
10
NA
NA
NA
5
State
7.055,235
6.478,216
9
57,919.0
112
31,467
29,021
15
8
19,249
16,250
18
29
21
29
3,566.000
5
567,029
21
556,000
394,000
-3
as.
260,340.990
248,709.873
5
3,536,278.1
70
32,264
30.056
7
7
20,800
17,690
18
20
20
25
131,056,000
6
18.183.381
19
18,253.000
11.654,000
-4
Data sources used were not always complete or current.
Attempts have been made to verity data, but errors may still exist
-------
Hapeville, GA Ford Plant
Mag 13.00
ThuOct 24 10:06 1996
Scale 1.62,500 (at center)
1 Mites
2 KM
Secondary SR, Road, Hwy Ramp
Major Connector
State Route
Primary State Route
US Highway
Interstate/Limited Access
Railroad
Point of Interest
Town, Small City
Park or Reservation
Service Airport
Locale
City
County Boundary
Population Center
Lake, Ocean, Large River
River, Canal
-------
FORD MOTOR CO
340 HENRY FORD II AVE
HAPEVILLE GA
Tri Number: 30354FRDMT340HE
Map # SIC Name
Address
City
State
0 3711 FORD MOTOR CO. ATLANTA ASSEMBLY PLANT
1 2656 INTERNATIONAL PAPER
2 SPENCER COS. INC. S. ICE DIV.
3 2819 Cl HOLDINGS INC. SSC IND.
4 2819 GENERAL CHEMICAL CORP. ATLANTA WORKS
5 3221 OWENS-BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAINER INC.
6 2052 KEEBLER CO.
7 3341 SOUTHERN ZINC
8 2992 CATO OIL & GREASE CO.
9 2752 TREASURE CHEST ADVERTISING
10 2087 COCA-COLA USA
11 2841 TIME PRODS. INC.
13 3911 AIR TREADS INC. ATLANTA DIV.
14 3411 AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO.
15 2891 H. B. FULLER CO.
16 2842 CLOROX CO.
17 2599 MURPHY & ORR CO.
18 2045 MERICO INC.
19 3069 SAMUEL BINGHAM CO.
20 2821 CARGILL INC. CHEMICAL PRODUCTS DIV.
340 HENRY FORD II AVE.
2323 N. SYLVAN RD.
1586 E.TAYLOR AVE.
1550 E. TAYLOR
1427 CENTRAL AVE.
3107 SYLVAN RD.
111 HOLLOW TREE LN.
1359 CENTRAL AVE.
3480 BROWNS MILL RD. S.E.
BROWNSMILL RD.
3791 BROWNS MILL RD.
3780 BROWNS MILL RD.
14 ROYAL OAK DR.
48 ROYAL DR.
4630 LAKE MIRROR PL.
17 LAKE MIRROR RD.
564 MAIN ST.
273 CENTRAL AVE.
4880 SAMUEL BINGHAM CT.
71 BARNETT RD.
HAPEVILLE
EAST POINT
EAST POINT
EAST POINT
EAST POINT
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
EAST POINT
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
FOREST PARK
FOREST PARK
FOREST PARK
FOREST PARK
FOREST PARK
FOREST PARK
COLLEGE PARK
FOREST PARK
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
-------
AREA WIDE 1994 TRI EMISSION PROFILE
FORD MOTOR CO
FULTON COUNTY, Georgia
Map Key:
kutc
'etease
Latitude: 33 39 6
Longitude: 84 24 9
'lam
l~o of/site
uon
3 Mile Buffer
Number without a Symbol denotes no reported emissions over 0.5 pounds per year
-------
1994 TRI EMISSIONS (LB/YEAR) AT FACILITIES WITHIN THREE MILES OF
FORD MOTOR CO TRI NO: 30354FRDMT340HE
Chemical Name
Air Fugitive
(Non- Point
Source)
Emissions
Ait Stack
(Point
Source)
Emissions
Discharge
to On- Site
Surface
Hater
Land TOTAL Discharge
Disposal RELEASES to POTW
Transfer
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
FORD MOTOR CO. ATLANTA ASSEMBLY PLANT
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 3711
MOTOR VEHICLES & CAR BODIES
MAP LOCATION NO:
340 HENRY FORD II AVE.
HAPEVILLE
GA 30354
METHANOL
N- BUTYL ALCOHOL
BENZENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
ETHYLBENZENE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CYCLOHEXANE
DK2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS)
METHYL TERT- BUTYL ETHER
BARIUM COMPOUNDS
GLYCOL ETHERS
LEAD COMPOUNDS
MANGANESE COMPOUNDS
ZINC COMPOUNDS
SUBTOTALS
1,200
740
21
10,000
520
0
2,000
2,200
1
0
26,000
210
0
1,300
0
2,500
250
46,942
49,
150,
34,
100,
60,
8,
450,
250,
1,102,
000
000
57
000
000
0
000
200
2
0
000
560
270
000
0
0
0
089
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50,
150,
44,
100,
62,
10,
476,
251,
2,
1,149,
200
740
78
000
520
0
000
400
3
0
000
770
270
300
0
500
250
031
0
0
0
0
0
4,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
700
22,000
37
270
360
27,367
3,850
11,500
0
2,640
870,076
56,000
310,270
515
0
320
335,400
0
57,900
14,500
210
12,000
14,001
1,689,182
3,
11,
2,
870,
60,
310,
335,
58,
36,
12,
14,
1,716,
850
500
0
640
076
000
270
515
0
320
400
0
600
500
247
270
361
549
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
2323 N. SYLVAN RD.
EAST POINT
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2656
SANITARY FOOD CONTAINERS
MAP LOCATION NO:
GA 30344
GLYCOL ETHERS
9,060
SUBTOTALS 9,060
3,020
3,020
0
0
0
0
12,080
12,080
0
0
750
750
750
750
SPENCER COS. INC. S. ICE DIV.
1586 E. TAYLOR AVE.
EAST POINT GA 30344
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE:
MAP LOCATION NO:
SUBTOTALS
-------
1994 TRI EMISSIONS (LB/YEAR) AT FACILITIES WITHIN THREE MILES OF
FORD MOTOR CO TRI NO: 30354FRDMT340HE
Air Fugitive
(Non- Point
Source)
Chemical Name Emissions
CI HOLDINGS INC. SSC IND.
1550 E. TAYLOR
EAST POINT GA 30344
DIETHANOLAMINE 5
SUBTOTALS 5
GENERAL CHEMICAL CORP. ATLANTA WORKS
1427 CENTRAL AVE .
EAST POINT GA 30344
SULFURIC ACID 0
SUBTOTALS 0
OWENS -BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAINER INC.
3107 SYLVAN RD.
ATLANTA GA 30354
DICHLOROMETHANE 0
METHYL ETHYL KETONE 2,500
HYDROCHLORIC ACID 0
AMMONIA 0
SUBTOTALS 2,500
KEEBLER CO.
Ill HOLLOW TREE LN.
ATLANTA GA 30354
AMMONIA 0
SUBTOTALS 0
Ait Stack Discharge
(Point to On- Site
Source) Surface Land
Emissions Hater Disposal
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2819
750 0
750 0
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2819
4,455 0
4,455 0
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 3221
4,100 0
750 0
49,000 0
13,000 0
66,850 0
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2052
83,000 0
83,000 0
TOTAL Discharge TOTAL
RELEASES to POTN Transfer TRANSFERS
INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS
0 755 250
0 755 250
INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS
0 4,455 0
0 4,455 0
GLASS
0
0
0
0
0
CONTAINERS
4,100 0
3,250 0
49,000 0
13,000 0
69,350 0
COOKIES AND CRACKERS
0 83,000 0
0 83,000 0
MAP LOCATION NO:
0 250
0 250
MAP LOCATION NO:
0 0
0 0
MAP LOCATION NO:
0 0
340 340
0 0
0 0
340 340
MAP LOCATION NO:
0 0
0 0
3
4
5
6
-------
1994 TRI EMISSIONS (LB/YEAR) AT FACILITIES WITHIN THREE MILES OF
FORD MOTOR CO TRI NO: 30354FRDMT340HE
Chemical Name
Air Fugitive Ait Stack Discharge
(Non-Point (Point to On-Site
Source) Source) Surface Land TOTAL Discharge
Emissions Emissions Hater Disposal RELEASES to POTW
Transfer
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
SOUTHERN ZINC
1359 CENTRAL AVE.
EAST POINT
GA 30344
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 3341
2NDARY SMELT/NONFERROUS METALS MAP LOCATION NO:
SUBTOTALS
CATO OIL & GREASE CO.
3480 BROWNS MILL RD. S.E.
ATLANTA GA 30354
ZINC COMPOUNDS
SUBTOTALS
0
0
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2992
0 0
0 0
LUBRICATING OILS AND GREASES MAP LOCATION NO:
0
0
0
0
TREASURE CHEST ADVERTISING
BROWNSMILL RD.
ATLANTA GA 30354
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2752
COMMERCIAL PRINT, LITHOGRAPHIC MAP LOCATION NO:
SUBTOTALS
COCA-COLA USA
3791 BROWNS MILL RD.
ATLANTA
GA 30354 2946
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2087
FLAV EXTR & FLAV SYRUPS, NEC MAP LOCATION NO:
10
SUBTOTALS
-------
1994 TRI EMISSIONS (LB/YEAR) AT FACILITIES WITHIN THREE MILES OF
FORD MOTOR CO TRI NO: 30354FRDMT340HE
Chemical Name
Air Fugitive
(Non-Point
Source)
Emissions
Ait Stack
(Point
Source)
Emissions
Discharge
to On-Site
Surface
Water
Land TOTAL Discharge
Disposal RELEASES to POTW
Transfer
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
TIME PRODS. INC.
3780 BROWNS MILL RD.
ATLANTA
GA 30354
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2841
SOAP/DETERG EXC SPECIAL CLEANR MAP LOCATION NO:
11
SUBTOTALS
AIR TREADS INC. ATLANTA DIV.
GA 30050
14 ROYAL OAK DR.
FOREST PARK
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 3911
JEWELRY, PRECIOUS METAL
MAP LOCATION NO:
13
SUBTOTALS
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO.
48 ROYAL DR.
FOREST PARK
N- BUTYL ALCOHOL
MANGANESE
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
GLYCOL ETHERS
GA 30050
18,859
0
0
19,248
SUBTOTALS 38,107
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 3411
106,865
0
250
123,799
230,914
0
0
0
0
0
METAL
0
0
0
0
0
CANS
125,724
0
250
143,047
269,021
MAP LOCATION NO: 14
0
5
0
0
5
0
43
0
0
43
0
48
0
0
48
H. B. FULLER CO.
4630 LAKE MIRROR PL.
FOREST PARK
GLYCOL ETHERS
GA 30050
SUBTOTALS
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2891
0 0
0 0
ADHESIVES AND SEALANTS
MAP LOCATION NO:
15
0
0
0
0
190
190
470
470
660
660
-------
1994 TRI EMISSIONS (LB/YEAR) AT FACILITIES WITHIN THREE MILES OF
FORD MOTOR CO TRI NO: 30354FRDMT340HE
Air Fugitive
(Non- Point
Source)
Chemical Name Emissions
CLOROX CO.
17 LAKE MIRROR RD.
FOREST PARK GA 30050
CHLORINE 0
GLYCOL ETHERS 0
SUBTOTALS 0
MURPHY & ORR CO.
564 MAIN ST.
FOREST PARK GA 30050 1898
SUBTOTALS 0
Ait Stack Discharge
(Point to On- Site
Source) Surface Land TOTAL Discharge TOTAL
Emissions Water Disposal RELEASES to POTW Transfer TRANSFERS
SIC DESCRIPTION: SPECIALTY CLEANING, POLISHING MAP LOCATION NO: 16
SIC CODE: 2842
S 0 05 0 0 0
4004 263 0 263
9009 263 0 263
SIC DESCRIPTION: FURNITURE AND FIXTURES, NEC MAP LOCATION NO: 17
SIC CODE: 2599
0000000
MERICO INC.
273 CENTRAL AVE.
FOREST PARK
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2045
BLENDED AND PREPARED FLOUR
MAP LOCATION NO:
18
GA 30050
SUBTOTALS
SAMUEL BINGHAM CO.
4880 SAMUEL BINGHAM CT.
COLLEGE PARK
GA 30349
DIBUTYL PHTHALATE
SUBTOTALS
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 3069
0 0
0 0
FABRICATED RUBBER PRODUCTS,NEC MAP LOCATION NO:
7,100
7,100
7,100
7,100
19
-------
1994 TRI EMISSIONS (LB/YEAR) AT FACILITIES WITHIN THREE MILES OF
FORD MOTOR CO TRI NO: 30354FRDMT340HE
Air Fugitive
(Non- Point
Source)
Chemical Name Emissions
Ait Stack
(Point
Source)
Emissions
Discharge
to
Surface
Water
On-Site
Land
Disposal
TOTAL
RELEASES
Discharge
to POTW Transfer
TOTAL
TRANSFERS
CARGILL INC. CHEMICAL PRODUCTS DIV.
71 BARNETT RD.
FOREST PARK
GA 30050
N-BUTYL ALCOHOL
SEC-BUTYL ALCOHOL
METHYL METHACRYLATE
PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE
NAPHTHALENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
STYRENE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
MALEIC ANHYDRIDE
TOLUENE
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS)
TOLUENEDIISOCYANATE (MIXED ISO
GLYCOL ETHERS
1,
2,
72
38
64
132
92
61
450
680
278
196
079
323
31
173
26
36
156
42
3
44
273
529
0
0
572
1,719
0
25
SIC DESCRIPTION:
SIC CODE: 2821
PLSTC MAT./SYN RESINS/NV BLAST MAP LOCATION NO:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
98
74
220
174
95
105
723
1,209
278
196
1,651
4,042
31
198
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
26
0
0
146
59
652
14,000
1,124
1,652
26,757
391
52
0
16,855
102,043
0
76
146
59
652
14,000
1,124
1,652
26,763
391
52
0
16,855
102,069
0
76
20
SUBTOTALS
5,669
3,425
9,094
32
163,807
163,839
-------
Ford Motor Gonpany
Hapeville Futton County, Georgia
TRI# :30354FRDMT340HE
LatHudE33396N
Um0tude:84249W
MAP KEY:
CtutyBanM«s
Ml Road
Che Nile
PCRJLA710N DeefTY/Sa MLE
Owterttvn 10000
•nao-iaooo
too-woo
10-100
1-10
Mncrty, powrty, mi Htfi Schod
I ] 40-SD
l_J 30-40
' ' 20-30
I 1 tt-20
•H 0-10
Below Poverty Lewd
Percartageof PppJabon not
ft)pui*on Oersty
PtopteParSq-Mte
MnorrtyPopuiation
Percent o« ToW PopUation
-------
Ford Motor Cdrrpsny
Hapeville Fulton County, Georgia
MOP KEY:
QutyBcunMw
Irtorabtohtyway
UBH^wray
Ml Rod
OraMki
TVmaMkiB
HveMee
TRI# :30354FRDMT340HE
Latitude 33 396N
Latitude: 84 249 W
POPULATION DeefTY/SCl ML£
Qatar than WOOD
WOO-10000
100-1000
Mnority, paucrty, aid H^i Schod
Irrarpkte percentage,.
10-100
CD 1-10
OaterthanSD
40-SD
30-40
20-30
10-20
0-K>
Rercertageof TcW PopJa(ion
Below Poverty Led
PercertageofPopUatoonnol
PopUadon Denerty
Peopte Per Sq.Mle
MnoittyPopUalion
RencertofTotalRDpulalian
-------
APPENDICES
Appendix A: CSI Auto Sector Subcommittee and Project Team A-l
Appendix B: Description of the Common Sense Initiative B-l
Appendix C: Data Work Group Members C-l
Appendix D: Description and Use of TRI Data D-l
Appendix E: Description and Use of RCRA Biennial Report Data E-l
Appendix F: Verification of Assembly Plant Location Coordinates F-l
Appendix G: Description of Corrections G-l
Appendix H: Attainment Status Classifications H-l
Appendix I: Methodology for 3-Mile Radius Demographic Profiles 1-1
Appendix J: Plants Closed or Converted 1991-1994 j-1
July 15, 1997
-------
APPENDIX A
CSI Auto Sector Subcommittee and Project Team
NAME
Mary Nichols
John Hankinson
Kevin Butt
David Carlson
Gary Davis
Lisa Doerr
Hank Graddy
Charles Griffith
Carolyn Hartmann
Grace Heigel
Pat Jackson
James Janssen
G. Robert Ken-
Kevin Mills
Franklin Mirer
Curtis Moore
Timothy O'Brien
Robert Phillips
Stu Rupp
Marta Segura
Lewis Shaw
Elizabeth Toomer
Mark Warner
Gary Weinreich
Paul Zugger
CSI Auto Sector Subcommittee
ORGANIZATION
U.S. EPA, Co-Chair
U.S. EPA Region 4, Co-Chair
Toyota
Chrysler
Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies,
University of Tennessee
Citizens for a Better Environment
Sierra Club
Ecology Center of Ann Arbor
U.S. Public Interest Research Group
Honda
People for Community Recovery
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
Environmental Defense Fund
United Automobile Workers
American Lung Association
Ford
General Motors
NUMMI
UCLA
SC Dept. of Health & Env. Control
Mercedez-Benz
BMW
Michigan DEQ
A-l
-------
CSI Auto Sector Alternative SRS/Community Team
NAME
Kevin Butt
Suzanne Childress
Andy Comei
Lisa Doerr
Joan Fassinger
Wayne Garfinkel
Prudence Goforth
Hank Graddy
Charles Griffith
Carolyn Hartmann
David Hill
Pat Jackson
James Janssen
G. Robert Ken-
Amy Lilly
Keith Mason
Kevin Mills
Curtis Moore
Chris Porter
Steve Rosenthal
Dave Salman
Jacki Savage
Sara Schneeberg
Ellen Shapiro
Larry Slimak
Quincy Styke
Gary Weinreich
ORGANIZATION
Toyota
U.S. EPA Office of Enforcement and Compliance
Assistance
United Automobile Workers
Citizens for a Better Environment
General Motors
U.S. EPA Region 4
U.S. EPA Common Sense Initiative
Sierra Club
Ecology Center of Ann Arbor
U.S. Public Interest Research Group
U.S. EPA Region 4
People for Community Recovery
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
Association of International Automobile
Manufacturers
U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation
Environmental Defense Fund
American Lung Association
Ford
U.S. EPA Region 5
U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation
Chrysler
U.S. EPA Office of General Counsel
American Automobile Manufacturers Association
American Automobile Manufacturers Association
Detroit
Tennessee Air Pollution Central Division
BMW
A-2
-------
APPENDIX B
Description of the Common Sense Initiative
United States Environmental
Protection Agency
Common Sense Initiative
(6101)
EPA 742-B-96-007
May 1997
Common Sense Initiative
Automobile Manufacturing Sector
Fact Sheet
Industry t
Background
Subcommittee
Background
and Status•*,/£•
As the largest industry in the United States, automobile manufacturing
plays a significant role in the nation's economy. The industry produces not
only vehicular transportation but also automotive parts and accessories. Though
facilities can be found across the United States, nearly 40 percent are
concentrated in the Great Lakes Region.
The Automobile Manufacturing Subcommittee consists of nearly 25
members from diverse backgrounds. Members come from such organizations
as General Motors, Toyota, the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, and
the Ecology Center of Ann Arbor.
In the Spring of 1997, a full complement of Project Goals were reached.
The Subcommittee reviewed and accepted the documentary reports which
represented thoughtful consideration of several crucial environmental policy
questions such as: How might industry and community interact and exchange
information? Are there realistic alternatives to the existing regulatory system?
Where in the manufacturing process can industry gain efficiencies and
flexibility, meet economic realities, and maintain strong environmental
standards?
The Subcommittee will present its findings to the CSI Council and
conclude its current agenda. However, involvement with the community
participation project in Louisville, Kentucky will continue.
B-l
-------
Automobile Manufacturing Sector
Alternative Sector
Regulatory System/
Community
Technical
Assistance and
Involvement Team
Project Contact: x
Keith Mason
U.S. EPA 3
202-260-1360
Life-Cycle
Management/ ,
Supplier
Partnership Project
Project Contact:
Julie Lynch
U.S. EPA
202-260-4000 ,
This team addressed automobile manufacturing regulatory systems and
community involvement. Core principles and a process for implementing an
alternative to today's regulatory system impacting the automobile manufacturing
industry was proposed. The team also explored in detail the unique role and
information needs of the community in creating such alternatives.
The following set of resultant documents was approved by the Subcommittee
and will be forwarded to the Council for their consideration and dissemination.
Consensus Documents
• Principles for an Alternative Sector Regulatory System
• U.S. Automobile Assembly Plants and Their Communities:
Environmental, Economic and Demographic Profiles
Support Documents
• The Process of Implementing an Alternative Sector Regulatory System
• A Review of Community Participation in Environmental Decision-
Making
• U. S. Automobile Assembly Plants and Their Communities: Summary
of Community and Plant Environmental and Economic Issues
Obtained through an Electronic Literature Search
There are opportunities for environmental and economic gains through the
wise selection and use of manufacturing materials using Life-Cycle Management.
Life-Cycle Management is most helpful to auto manufacturers and their suppliers.
EPA's understanding of this important environmental management tool will be
advanced thanks to the dedicated work of this team who explored the business
relationship between auto manufacturers, their many suppliers, and their role in
positively influencing environmental outcomes in the manufacturing process.
The team's final reports range from primary data issues to strategic
relationship issues to core Life-Cycle Management tool and policy assessments.
The following set of documents will be forwarded to the Council for their
consideration and dissemination.
Consensus Documents
• Conclusions Document
• Data Collection to Support Life-Cycle Management
• Life-Cycle Management Data Summary Points
• Framework for Evaluating Life-Cycle Management Information Needs
• Life-Cycle Management/Supplier Partnership Project Team Simulation
Exercise
Support Documents
• Tools and Policies for Life-Cycle Management/Life-Cycle
Partnerships
• Identifying the Supply Chains for Automotive Assembly Plants:
Supplier Process Descriptions and Pollution Prevention Opportunities
• The Chrysler Regulated Substance and Recyclability Certification
Data Collection and Reporting System
• Life-Cycle Inventory Analysis of Instrument Panels: VOC Emissions
in Manufacturing
B-2
-------
Automobile Manufacturing Sector
Regulatory
Initiative
Project
* ^l^f * * ' <
'Rroject Contact:
AiafrPowell >
JJ.S. EPA Region 4
404i562-9045r
Calendar
of Events
The Common ^i
Sense Initiative
The Regulatory Initiative Project applies common sense to improve the
- effectiveness of automobile manufacturing regulatory requirements. A multi-
stakeholder team concentrated on one specific area and initiated a project to
evaluate alternatives to the current and complex topcoat standard. The project
focused on evaluating the utility of expressing the current complex topcoat standard
in alternative forms which provide the public with more understandable information
and give the auto manufacturers a standard more consistent with international
regulations. The team focused on the viability of a mass/area standard and
determined that EPA should explore the possibilities of using this type of standard
in future rulemaking. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Council for
consideration and dissemination.
For information on current events, contact Sector Lead Alan Powell at 404-
562-9045 or Sector Alternate Keith Mason at 202-260-1360.
The Common Sense Initiative is an innovative approach to environmental
protection and pollution prevention developed by the U.S. EPA. The Initiative
addresses environmental management by industrial sector rather than by
environmental medium (air, water, land). EPA selected six industries to serve as
CSI pilots: automobile manufacturing, computer and electronics, iron and steel,
metal finishing, petroleum refining, and printing. Six sector subcommittees, each
consisting of representatives from industry, environmental justice organizations,
labor organizations, environmental organizations, and federal, state, and local
governments, address environmental issues facing these industries.
Since beginning their work in January 1995, the sector subcommittees have
initiated nearly 40 projects involving more than 150 stakeholders who actively
participate in sector subcommittees and subcommittee workgroups. Using a
consensus approach to decision making, the groups address diverse topics such as
pollution prevention, environmental reporting requirements, and public access to
environmental information.
For more information about CSI, call 202-260-7417, contact our web site at
http:vywww.epa.gov/commonsense, or write U.S. EPA, MC 6101,
401 M Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20460.
B-3
-------
Automobile Manufacturing Sector
Common Sense Initiative - Automobile Manufacturing Sector
Subcommittee Members and Affiliations
As of May 1997
Co-chair Mary Nichols
U.S. EPA
Co-chair John Hankinson
U.S. EPA Region 4
Designated Federal Officer
Alan Powell
U.S. EPA Region 4
Mr. David L. Carlson
Chrysler Technology Center
Mr. Gary A. Davis
Center for Clean Products & Clean
Technologies
Ms. Lisa Doerr
Citizens for a Better Environment
Mr. Hank Graddy
Sierra Club
Mr. Charles Griffith
Ecology Center of Ann Arbor
Mr. James A. Janssen
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Mr. G. Robert Ken-
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
Mr. Kevin Mills
Environmental Defense Fund
Mr. Franklin E. Mirer
United Automobile Workers
Mr. Curtis Moore
American Lung Association
Mr. Timothy J. O'Brien
Ford Motor Company
Mr. Robert J. Phillips
General Motors Corporation
Mr. QuincyN. Styke,m
Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division
Mr. Mark L. Warner
Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.
B-4
-------
APPENDIX C
Data Work Group Members
Wayne Garfinkel, EPA Region 4 (chair)
Suzanne Childress, EPA Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance
Lisa Doerr, Citizens for a Better Environment
Joan Fassinger, General Motors
Charles Griffith, Ecology Center of Ann Arbor
Keith Mason, EPA Office of Air and Radiation
Ellen Shapiro, American Automobile Manufacturers Association
C-l
-------
APPENDIX D
Description and Use of TRI Data
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is mandated by the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986. EPCRA provides for the collection and public
release of information about the presence and release of hazardous or toxic chemicals in our nation's
communities.
Section 313 of EPCRA requires manufacturers to report releases of over 300 chemicals that
have been designated as toxic to the environment. Reports are submitted to the U.S. EPA and to the
states. Facilities are required to report on releases of toxic chemicals into the air, water and land;
on off-site transfers to a separate facility for treatment or disposal; and on pollution prevention
activities and chemical recycling. Reports must be submitted on or before July 1 each year, covering
activities for the previous calendar year. Reporting began in 1987, and the 1994 reporting year was
the latest available for use in this report. The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 expanded the TRI
to include mandatory reporting of additional waste management and pollution prevention activities,
including recycling, use for energy recovery, and on-site treatment, beginning with the 1991
reporting year.
Not all facilities are required to submit TRI reports. A facility is required to report if it:
• Has ten or more full-time employees; and
• Manufactures or processes over 25,000 pounds of toxic chemicals or
chemical categories specified in EPCRA or added to the list by regulation, or
uses more than 10,000 pounds of any designated chemical or category; and
• Conducts selected manufacturing operations in the industry groups specified
in U.S. Government Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes 20
through 39.
Federal facilities became subject to reporting for the first time for the report due July 1,1995.
EPA is currently considering expansion of TRI reporting to other non-manufacturing sectors.
Beginning with the 1995 reporting year, certain facilities will be able to make use of an alternative
reporting threshold.
The TRI reporting requirements for 1994 covered 343 chemicals and 22 chemical categories.
Coverage of chemicals was greatly expanded (to approximately 600 chemicals) for the 1995
reporting year.
D-l
-------
Between 1991 and 1994 (the period covered by this report), some chemicals were added to
the TRI list and some were deleted. These changes in the list of designated chemicals complicates
the analysis of trends over time. The data reported in Parts II and III of this report include all
chemicals reported by facilities, and quantities of chemicals reported that were subsequently delisted
are noted in the Part m profiles. Analysis of trends reported in Part I excluded chemicals that were
delisted, to provide a common basis for analysis over time. Attachment D-l lists the chemicals that
were added or delisted between 1991 and 1994. Of these, only acetone and butyl benzyl phthalate
were reported by assembly plants.1 None of the chemicals added to the list after 1991 were reported
by assembly plants in 1994.
TRI requires the reporting of estimated data and does not mandate that facilities monitor their
releases. Various estimation methods are used when monitoring data are not available, which can
result in inconsistencies across facilities in reporting practices. The data used in this report are those
reported in Sections 5 and 6 of the reporting form (Form R).
1 No adjustments could be made for cases where the chemical listing was modified rather
than being deleted entirely. Modifications may affect the comparability over time of data reported
for the following chemicals and chemical categories: ammonia, sulfuric acid, barium compounds,
copper compounds, glycol ethers, and aluminum oxide (fibrous form).
D-2
-------
Attachment D-l
Chemicals Added to the TRI List
1991 Reporting Year
Stratospheric ozone depleters - chlorofluorocarbons and halons
Bromochlorodifluoromethane (Halon 1211)
Bromotrifluoromethane (Halon 1301)
Dibromotetrafluoroethane (Halon 2402)
Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (CFC-114)
Monochloropentafluoroethane (CFC-115)
Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11)
1994 Reporting Year
Class II ozone-depleting substances in section 602(b) of the Clean Air Act-
hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)
Chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22)
Dichlorotrifluoroethane (HCFC-123) and isomers
Chlorotetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124) and isomers
1,1-Dichloro-l-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b) and isomers
1 -Chloro-1,1 -difluoroethane (HCFC-142b)
New on RCRA hazardous waste list
Acetophenone
Amitrole
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Dihydrosafrole
Ethylene bisdithiocarbamic acid, salts and esters
Ethylidene dichloride
Formic Acid
Hexachlorophene
Hydrogen sulfide*
Malononitrile
Methacrylonitrile
Methyl chlorocarbonate
Methyl mercaptan*
2-Methylpyridine
5 -Nitro-o-toluidine
Paraldehyde
Pentachloroethane
Pronamide
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Thiram
Trypan blue
Warfarin and salts
"reporting for these chemicals has been suspended
D-3
-------
Chemicals Removed From the TRI List
Removed for 1991 Reporting Year
Aluminum oxide (non-fibrous)
Removed for 1992 Reporting Year
Di-n-Octyl phthalate (n-dioctyl phthalate)
Removed for 1993 Reporting Year
Barium sulfate (barium compound category)
Copper phthalocyanine compounds substituted with only bromine, chlorine, and/or
hydrogen (copper compounds category)
High molecular weight glycol ethers (glycol ethers category)
Removed for 1994 Reporting Year
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Ammonium sulfate (solution)
Acetone
Modified for 1994 Reporting Year
Ammonia (includes anhydrous ammonia and aqueous ammonia from water, dissociable
ammonium salts, and other sources; 10% of total aqueous ammonia is reportable
under this listing)
Sulfuric acid (acid aerosols including mists, vapors, gas, fog, and other airborne forms
of any particle size)
Aluminum oxide (fibrous forms)
D-4
-------
APPENDIX E
Description and Use of RCRA Biennial Report Data
The RCRA Biennial Report System is a national system that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste and is required by regulations implementing the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). The BRS captures data on two groups of RCRA-regulated
hazardous waste handlers: non-household Large Quantity Generators, and Treatment, Storage, and
Disposal facilities (TSDs). These facilities must submit a report every other year detailing the
quantities, composition, and characteristics of generated hazardous waste, the methods used to
manage the hazardous wastes, and the efforts taken to reduce the volume and toxicity of hazardous
wastes. BRS data exist for odd-numbered years; 1993 is the latest year for which BRS data are
currently available.
Information collected for the BRS is organized into five groups of databases, each group
corresponding to a different form submitted by reporting facilities.
• Form 1C - Identification and Certification. This form must be submitted
by all facilities required to file a biennial report and contains basic
identification information for each facility.
• Form GM - Waste Generation and Management. This form must be submitted
by all facilities required to file a biennial report that generated or shipped any
quantity of RCRA hazardous waste. A separate and independent Form GM must be
submitted for each RCRA hazardous waste. The Form GM and its corresponding
databases contain information regarding the type and quantity of the waste generated
or shipped as well as the management methods used in the treatment, storage,
disposal, or recycling of the waste.
Form WR - Waste Received From Off-Site. This form must be submitted by all
facilities required to file a biennial report that received RCRA hazardous waste from
off-site (including waste from all facilities, not just Large Quantity Generators and
TSDs). The Form WR and its corresponding databases include the type and quantity
of each waste received, the source of the waste, and the management method used
in treating, disposing, or recycling the waste.
Form PS - On-Site Waste Treatment, Disposal, or Recycling Process System.
This form must be submitted by all facilities required to file a biennial report for each
on-site hazardous waste treatment, disposal, or recycling process system that existed,
was planned, or was in the closure process during the reporting year. This
information includes the regulatory status of the system, the units comprising the
system, the components of the system, and the demand placed on the system.
E-l
-------
• Form OI - Off-Site Identification. This form must be submitted by all facilities
required to file a biennial report that received hazardous waste from off-site or sent
hazardous waste off-site. Form OI is not required by EPA; each state decides
whether to require this form.
To collect information for the universe of assembly plants, the Project Team searched four
of the GM-based databases ("Flat Files" Gl, G2, G5 and G6) using the EPA identification number
assigned to each facility by the RCRA program. The GM form contains EPA hazardous waste
codes, management system type (both on- and off-site), the quantity of waste generated and
managed, waste source, and waste physical form. All of the waste codes, source codes, waste form
codes, and management system codes used are attached at the end of this appendix.
In the analysis of BRS data in Part I of this report (pages 1-26 through I-30),distinction is
made between aqueous and non-aqueous waste. Guidelines used by EPA's Office of Solid Waste
were applied to determine whether a waste is aqueous or non-aqueous. A waste was classified as
aqueous if: 1) its waste form code is B101, B102, BIOS or B110-B116, or 2) its management
system code is M071-M079, M081-M085, M089, M091-M094, M099, M121-M125, M129, M134-
M136. All wastes not reporting one of these codes were classified as a non-aqueous waste. In a few
cases, auto company reviewers provided additional information on the physical form of specific
wastes.
There are a few things to bear in mind when using the BRS data. First, the BRS database is
not updated once it is publicly available (unlike the TRI database). This means that inaccuracies
may have been identified and have not been corrected. Second, facilities have the option of reporting
waste quantities in seven different units of measurement. To aggregate and compare quantities, it
is therefore necessary to convert all quantities to one standard unit of measurement (in this report,
tons). Methods used to convert quantities reported in other units to tons is provided later in this
appendix. Third, it is not possible to derive concentration data for each constituent in a wastestream.
Each wastestream in the BRS may be identified by multiple waste codes, indicating different types
of hazardous properties or constituents, but there is no way to assess the concentration of an
individual toxic constituent or the mixture ratios of multiple constituents. Two wastes generated in
the same quantity may therefore present different types of hazard and may contain very different
quantities of toxic constituents.
E-2
-------
Attachment E-1
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES
Code Waste description
Code Waste description
CHARACTERISTICS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE D018
D001 Ignitable waste DO 19
D002 Corrosive waste D020
D003 Reactive waste D021
D004 Arsenic D022
D005 Barium D023
D006 Cadmium D024
D007 Chromium D025
D008 Lead D026
D009 Mercury D027
DO 10 Selenium D028
D011 Silver D029
D012 Endrin(l,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-l,7-epoxy- D030
l,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-l,4-endo, endo-
5,8-dimeth-ano-naphthalene) D031
D013 Lindane(l,2,3,4,5,6-hexa- D032
chlorocyclohexane, gamma isomer)
D033
DO 14 Methoxychlor (1,1,1 -trichloro-2,2-bis [p-
methoxyphenyl] ethane) D034
D015 Toxaphene (C10 H10 C18, Technical D035
chlorinated camphene, 67-69 percent
chlorine) D036
D016 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) D037
D017 2,4,5-TP Silvex (2,4,5- D038
Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid)
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
p-Cresol
Cresol
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Heptachlor (and its epoxide)
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
Partial list - excludes K codes, which were not reported by assembly plants, and includes only those U
and P codes reported by assembly plants in 1991 or 1993.
E-3
-------
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES
Code Waste description
Code Waste description
D041 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
D042 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
D043 Vinyl chloride
HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM NONSPECIFIC
SOURCES
F001 The following spent halogenated solvents
used in degreasing: Tetrachloroethylene,
trichlorethylene, methylene chloride, 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride and
chlorinated fluorocarbons; all spent solvent
mixtures/blends used in degreasing
containing, before use, a total often percent
or more (by volume) of one or more of the
above halogenated solvents or those
solvents listed in F002, F004, and F005; and
still bottoms from the recovery of these
spent solvents and spent solvent mixtures.
F002 The following spent halogenated solvents:
Tetrachloroethylene, methylene chloride,
trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane,
chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane, ortho-dichlorobenzene,
trichlorofluoromethane, and 1,1,2,
trichloroethane; all spent solvent
mixtures/blends containing, before use, a
total often percent or more (by volume) of
one or more of the above halogenated
solvents or those solvents listed in F001,
F004, and F005; and still bottoms from the
recovery of these spent solvents and spent
solvent mixtures.
F003 The following spent non-halogenated
solvents: Xylene, acetone, ethyl acetate,
ethyl benzene, ethyl ether, methyl isobutyl
ketone, n-butyl alcohol, cyclohexanone, and
methanol; all spent solvent mixtures/ blends
containing, before use, only the above spent
nonhalogenated solvents; and all spent
solvent mixtures/blends containing, before
use, one or more of the above
nonhalogenated solvents, and a total often
percent or more (by volume) of one or more
of those solvents listed in F001, F002, F004,
and F005; and still bottoms from the
recovery of these spent solvents and spent
solvent mixtures.
F004 The following spent nonhalogenated
solvents: cresols, cresylic acid, and
nitrobenzene; and the still bottoms from the
recovery of these solvents; all spent solvent
mixtures/blends containing, before use, a
total often percent or more (by volume) of
one or more of the above nonhalogenated
solvents or those solvents listed in F001,
F002, and F005; and still bottoms from the
recovery of these spent solvents and spent
solvent mixtures.
F005 The following spent nonhalogenated
solvents: toluene, methyl ethyl ketone,
carbon disulfide, isobutanol, pyridine,
benzene, 2-ethoxyethanol, and 2-
nitropropane; all spent solvent
mixtures/blends containing, before use, a
total often percent or more (by volume) of
one or more of the above nonhalogenated
solvents or those solvents listed hi F001,
F002, or F004; and still bottoms from the
recovery of these spent solvents and spent
solvent mixtures.
F006 Wastewater treatment sludges from
electroplating operations except from the
following processes: (1) sulfuric acid
anodizing of aluminum; (2) tin plating on
carbon steel; (3) zinc plating (segregated
basis) on carbon steel; (4) aluminum or
zinc-aluminum plating on carbon steel; (5)
cleaning/stripping associated with tin, zinc,
and aluminum plating on carbon steel; and
(6) chemical etching and milling of
aluminum.
Partial list - excludes K codes, which were not reported by assembly plants, and includes only those U
and P codes reported by assembly plants in 1991 or 1993.
E-4
-------
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES
Code Waste description
Code Waste description
F007 Spent cyanide plating bath solutions from
electroplating operations.
F008 Plating bath residues from the bottom of F022
plating baths from electroplating operations
in which cyanides are used in the process.
F009 Spent stripping and cleaning bath solutions
from electroplating operations in which
cyanides are used in the process.
FO10 Quenching bath residues from oil baths from F023
metal heat treating operations in which
cyanides are used in the process.
FO 11 Spent cyanide solutions from slat bath pot
cleaning from metal heat treating operations.
FO 12 Quenching wastewater treatment sludges
from metal heat treating operations in which
cyanides are used in the process.
FO 19 Wastewater treatment sludges from the
chemical conversion coating of aluminum F024
except from zirconium phosphating in
aluminum can washing when such
phosphating is an exclusive conversion
coating process.
F020 Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
from hydrogen chloride purification) from
the production or manufacturing use (as a
reactant, chemical intermediate, or
component in a formulating process) of tri-
or tetrachlorophenol or of intermediates
used to produce their pesticide derivatives.
(This listing does not include wastes from
the production of hexachlorophene from F025
highly purified 2,4,5-trichlorophenol.)
F021 Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
from hydrogen chloride purification) from
the production or manufacturing use (as a
reactant, chemical intermediate, or
component in a formulating process) of
pentachlorophenol, or of intermediates used
to produce derivatives.
Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
from hydrogen chloride purification) from
the manufacturing use (as a reactant,
chemical intermediate, or component in a
formulating process) of tetra-, penta-, or
hexachlorobenzenes under alkaline
conditions.
Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
from hydrogen chloride purification) from
the production of materials on equipment
previously used for the production or
manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical
intermediate, or component in a formulating
process) of tri- and tetrachlorophenols.
(This listing does not include wastes from
equipment used only for the production or
use of hexachlorophene from highly purified
2,4,5-trichlorophenol.)
Process wastes including, but not limited to,
distillation residues, heavy ends, tars, and
reactor clean-out wastes, from the
production of certain chlorinated aliphatic
hydrocarbons by free radical catalyzed
processes. These chlorinated aliphatic
hydrocarbons are those having carbon chain
lengths ranging from one to and including
five, with varying amounts and positions of
chlorine substitution. (This listing does not
include wastewaters, wastewater treatment
sludge, spent catalysts, and wastes listed in
Sections 261.31. or 261.32)
Condensed light ends, spent filters and filter
aids, and spent desiccant wastes from the
production of certain chlorinated aliphatic
hydrocarbons, by free radical catalyzed
processes. These chlorinated aliphatic
hydrocarbons are those having carbon chain
lengths ranging from one, to and including
Partial list - excludes K codes, which were not reported by assembly plants, and includes only those U
and P codes reported by assembly plants in 1991 or 1993.
E-5
-------
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES
Code Waste description
Code Waste description
five, with varying amounts and positions of F034
chlorine substitution.
F026 Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
from hydrogen chloride purification) from
the production of materials on equipment
previously used for the manufacturing use
(as a reactant, chemical intermediate, or
component in a formulating process) of
terra-, penta-, or hexachlorobenzene under F035
alkaline conditions.
F027 Discarded unused formulations containing
tri-, terra-, or pentachlorophenol or
discarded unused formulations containing
compounds derived from these
chlorophenols. (This listing does not
include formulations containing
hexachlorophene synthesized from
prepurified 2,4,5-trichlorophenol as the sole F037
component.)
F028 Residues resulting from the incineration or
thermal treatment of soil contaminated with
EPA hazardous waste nos. F020, F021,
F022, F023, F026, and F027.
F032 Wastewaters, process residuals, preservative
drippage, and spent formulations from wood
preserving processes generated at plants that
currently use, or have previously used,
chlorophenolic formulations [except
potentially cross-contaminated wastes that
have had the F032 waste code deleted in
accordance with Section 261.35 (i.e., the
newly promulgated equipment cleaning or
replacement standards), and where the
generator does not resume or initiate use of
chlorophenolic formulations]. (This listing
does not include K001 bottom sediment
sludge from the treatment of waste water F038
from wood preserving processes that use
creosote and/or pentachlorophenol.)
Wastewaters, process residuals, preservative
drippage, and spent formulations from wood
preserving processes generated at plants that
use creosote formulations. This listing does
not include K001 bottom sediment sludge
from the treatment of wastewater from wood
preserving processes that use creosote
and/or pentachlorophenol.
Wastewaters, process residuals, preservative
drippage, and spent formulations from wood
preserving processes generated at plants that
use inorganic preservatives containing
arsenic or chromium. This listing does not
include K001 bottom sediment sludge from
the treatment of wastewater from wood
preserving processes that use creosote
and/or pentachlorophenol.
Petroleum refinery primary oil/water/solids
separation sludge - Any sludge generated
from the gravitational separation of
oil/water/solids during the storage or
treatment of process wastewaters and oily
cooling wastewaters from petroleum
refineries. Such sludges include, but are not
limited to, those generated in
oil/water/solids separators; tanks and
impoundments; ditches and other
conveyances; sumps; and storm water units
receiving dry weather flow. Sludges
generated in storm water units that do not
receive dry weather flow, sludges generated
in aggressive biological treatment units as
defined in Section 261.31(b)(2)(including
sludges generated in one or more additional
units after wastewaters have been treated in
aggressive biological treatment units), and
K051 wastes are exempted from this listing.
Petroleum refinery secondary (emulsified)
oil/water/solids separation sludge - Any
sludge and/or float generated from the
physical and/or chemical separation of
oil/water/solids in process wastewaters and
Partial list - excludes K codes, which were not reported by assembly plants, and includes only those U
and P codes reported by assembly plants in 1991 or 1993.
E-6
-------
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES
Code Waste description
Code Waste description
oily cooling wastewaters from petroleum
refineries. Such wastes include, but are not
limited to, all sludges and floats generated in
induced air flotation (IAF) units, tanks and
impoundments, and all sludges generated in
DAF units. Sludges generated in
stormwater units that do not receive dry
weather flow, sludges generated in
aggressive biological treatment units as
defined in Section 261.31(b)(2) (including
sludges generated in one or more additional
units after wastewaters have been treated in
aggressive biological treatment units), and
F037, K048, and K051 wastes are exempted
from this listing.
F039 Leachate resulting from the treatment,
storage, or disposal of wastes classified by
more than one waste code under Subpart D,
or from a mixture of wastes classified under
SubpartsC and D of this part. (Leachate
resulting from the management of one or
more of the following EPA Hazardous
Wastes and no other hazardous wastes
retains its hazardous waste code(s): F020,
F021, F022, F023, F026, F027, and/or
F028.)
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL
PRODUCTS, OFF-SPECIFICATION SPECIES,
CONTAINER RESIDUALS, AND SPILL
RESIDUES THEREOF-ACIHE HAZARDOUS
WASTE
(AN ALPHABETIZED LISTING CAN BE FOUND
AT40 CFR 261.33.)
POOS 2-Propen-l-ol
POOS Allyl alcohol
P012 Arsenic oxide As2O3
P012 Arsenic trioxide
P018 Brucine
PO18 Strychnidin-10-one, 2,3-dimethoxy-
P028 Benzene, (chloromethyl)-
P028 Benzyl chloride
P029 Copper cyanide
P029 Copper cyanide Cu(CN)
P059 4,7-Methano-lH-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-
heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-
P059 Heptachlor
P098 Potassium cyanide
P098 Potassium cyanide K(CN)
P106 Sodium cyanide
P106 Sodium cyanide Na(CN)
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL
PRODUCTS, OFF-SPECIFICATION SPECIES,
CONTAINER RESIDUES, AND SPILL
RESIDUES THEREOF—TOXIC WASTES
(AN ALPHABETIZED LISTING CAN BE FOUND
AT40 CFR 261.33.)
U007 2-Propenamide
U007 Acrylamide
U051 Creosote
U052 Cresol (Cresylic acid)
U052 Phenol, methyl-
U080 Methane, dichloro-
Partial list - excludes K codes, which were not reported by assembly plants, and includes only those U
and P codes reported by assembly plants in 1991 or 1993.
E-7
-------
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES
Code Waste description
Code Waste description
U080 Methylene chloride
U117 Ethane, 1,1'-oxybis-(I)
U117 Ethyl ether (I)
U121 Methane, trichlorofluoro-
U121 Trichloromonofluoromethane
U122 Formaldehyde
U151 Mercury
U154 Methanol (I)
U154 Methyl alcohol (I)
U210 Ethene, tetrachloro-
U210 Tetrachloroethylene
U225 Bromoform
U225 Methane, tribromo-
U226 Ethane, 1,1,1-trichloro-
U226 Methyl chloroform
U240 2,4-D, salts & esters
U240 Acetic acid, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-, salts &
esters
U240 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-D
U210 Ethene, tetrachloro-
U210 Tetrachloroethylene
U225 Bromoform
U225 Methane, tribromo-
U226 Ethane, 1,1,1-trichloro-
U226 Methyl chloroform
U240 2,4-D, salts & esters
U240 Acetic acid, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-, salts &
esters
U240 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-D
Partial list - excludes K codes, which were not reported by assembly plants, and includes only those U
and P codes reported by assembly plants in 1991 or 1993.
E-8
-------
SOURCE CODES
Code Waste source
Code Waste source
CLEANING AND DECREASING
A01 Stripping
A02 Acid cleaning
A03 Caustic (Alkali) cleaning
A04 Flush rinsing
A05 Dip rinsing
A06 Spray rinsing
A07 Vapor degreasing
A08 Physical scraping and removal
A09 Clean out process equipment
A19 Other cleaning and degreasing
SURFACE PREPARATION AND FINISHING
A21 Painting
A22 Electroplating
A23 Electroless plating
A24 Phosphating
A25 Heat treating
A26 Pickling
A27 Etching
A29 Other surface coating/preparation (Specify
in Comments)
PROCESSES OTHER THAN SURFACE
PREPARATION
A31 Product rinsing
A32 Product filtering
A33 Product distillation
A34 Product solvent extraction
A3 5 By-product processing
A36 Spent catalyst removal
A37 Spent process liquids removal
A38 Tank sludge removal
A39 Slag removal
A40 Metal forming
A41 Plastics forming
A49 Other processes other than surface
preparation (Specify in Comments)
PRODUCTION OR SERVICE DERIVED ONE-
TIME AND INTERMITTENT PROCESSES
A51 Leak collection
A53 Cleanup of spill residues
A54 Oil changes
A55 Filter/Battery replacement
A56 Discontinue use of process equipment
A57 Discarding off-spec material
A58 Discarding out-of-date products or
chemicals
A59 Other production-derived one-time and
intermittent processes
A60 Sludge removal
REMEDIATION DERIVED WASTE
A61 Superfund Remedial Action
A62 Superfund Emergency Response
A63 RCRA Corrective Action at solid waste
management unit
A64 RCRA closure of hazardous waste
management unit
A65 Underground storage tank cleanup
A69 Other remediation
POLLUTION CONTROL OR WASTE
TREATMENT PROCESSES
A71 Filtering/screening
A72 Metals recovery
A73 Solvents recovery
A74 Incineration/Thermal treatment
A75 Wastewater treatment
A76 Sludge dewatering
A77 Stabilization
A78 Air pollution control devices
A79 Leachate collection
A89 Other pollution control or waste treatment
OTHER PROCESSES
A91 Clothing and personal protective equipment
A92 Routine cleanup wastes (e.g., floor
sweepings)
A93 Closure of management unit(s) or
equipment other than by remediation
specified in codes A61 - A69
A94 Laboratory wastes
A99 Other
E-9
-------
FORM CODES
Code Waste description
Code Waste description
LAB PACKS - Lab packs of mixed wastes,
chemicals, lab wastes
BOO 1 Lab packs of old chemicals only
B002 Lab packs of debris only
B003 Mixed lab packs
B004 Lab packs containing acute hazardous
wastes
B009 Other lab packs (Specify in Comments)
LIQUIDS
INORGANIC LIQUIDS - Waste that is primarily
inorganic and highly fluid (e.g., aqueous), with low
suspended inorganic solids and low organic content
B101 Aqueous waste with low solvents
B102 Aqueous waste with low other toxic
organics
B103 Spent acid with metals
B104 Spent acid without metals
B105 Acidic aqueous waste
B106 Caustic solution with metals but no cyanides
B107 Caustic solution with metals and cyanides
BIOS Caustic solution with cyanides but no metals
B109 Spent caustic
B110 Caustic aqueous waste
Bill Aqueous waste with reactive sulfides
B112 Aqueous waste with other reactives (e.g.,
explosives)
B113 Other aqueous waste with high dissolved
solids
B114 Other aqueous waste with low dissolved
solids
B115 Scrubber water
B116 Leachate
B117 Waste liquid mercury
B119 Other inorganic liquids (Specify in
Comments)
ORGANIC LIQUIDS - Waste that is primarily
organic and is highly fluid, with low inorganic solids
content and low-to-moderate water content
B201 Concentrated solvent-water solution
B202 Halogenated (e.g., chlorinated) solvent
B203 Nonhalogenated solvent
B204 Halogenated/nonhalogenated solvent
mixture
B205 Oil-water emulsion or mixture
B206 Waste oil
B207 Concentrated aqueous solution of other
organics
B208 Concentrated phenolics
B209 Organic paint, ink, lacquer, or varnish
B210 Adhesives or epoxies
B211 Paint thinner or petroleum distillates
B212 Reactive or polymerizable organic liquid
B219 Other organic liquids (Specify in
Comments)
SOLIDS
INORGANIC SOLIDS - Waste that is primarily
inorganic and solid, with low organic content and
low-to-moderate water content; not pumpable
B301 Soil contaminated with organics
B302 Soil contaminated with inorganics only
B303 Ash, slag, or other residue from incineration
of wastes
B304 Other "dry" ash, slag, or thermal residue
B305 "Dry" lime or metal hydroxide solids
chemically "fixed"
B306 "Dry" lime or metal hydroxide solids not
"fixed"
B307 Metal scale, filings, or scrap
B308 Empty or crushed metal drums or containers
B309 Batteries or battery parts, casings, cores
B310 Spent solid filters or adsorbents
B311 Asbestos solids and debris
B312 Metal-cyanide salts/chemicals
B313 Reactive cyanide salts/chemicals
B314 Reactive sulfide salts/chemicals
B315 Other reactive salts/chemicals
B316 Other metal salts/chemicals
B319 Other waste inorganic solids (Specify in
Comments)
ORGANIC SOLIDS - Waste that is primarily
organic and solid, with low-to-moderate inorganic
content and water content; not pumpable
B401 Halogenated pesticide solid
B402 Nonhalogenated pesticide solid
B403 Solid resins or polymerized organics
B404 Spent carbon
B405 Reactive organic solid
B406 Empty fiber or plastic containers
B407 Other halogenated organic solids (Specify in
Comments)
B409 Other nonhalogenated organic solids
(Specify in Comments)
E-10
-------
FORM CODES
Code Waste description Code Waste description
SLUDGES GASES
INORGANIC SLUDGES - Waste that is primarily INORGANIC GASES - Waste that is primarily
inorganic, with moderate-to-high water content and inorganic with a low organic content and is a gas at
low organic content, and pumpable atmospheric pressure
B501 Lime sludge without metals B701 Inorganic gases
B502 Lime sludge with metals/metal hydroxide
sludge ORGANIC GASES - Waste that is primarily organic
B503 Wastewater treatment sludge with toxic with low-to-moderate inorganic content and is a gas
organics at atmospheric pressure
B504 Other wastewater treatment sludge
B505 Untreated plating sludge without cyanides B801 Organic gases
B506 Untreated plating sludge with cyanides
B507 Other sludge with cyanides
B508 Sludge with reactive sulfides
B509 Sludge with other reactives
B510 Degreasing sludge with metal scale or
filings
B511 Air pollution control device sludge (e.g., fly
ash, wet scrubber sludge)
B512 Sediment or lagoon dragout contaminated
with organics
B513 Sediment or lagoon dragout contaminated
with inorganics only
B514 Drilling mud
B515 Asbestos slurry or sludge
B516 Chloride or other brine sludge
B519 Other inorganic sludges (Specify in
Comments)
ORGANIC SLUDGES - Waste that is primarily
organic with low-to-moderate inorganic solids
content and water content, and pumpable
B601 Still bottoms of halogenated (e.g.,
chlorinated) solvents or other organic
liquids
B602 Still bottoms of nonhalogenated solvents or
other organic liquids
B603 Oily sludge
B604 Organic paint or ink sludge
B605 Reactive or polymerizable organics
B606 Resins, tars, or tarry sludge
B607 Biological treatment sludge
B608 Sewage or other untreated biological sludge
B609 Other organic sludges (Specify in
Comments)
E-ll
-------
SYSTEM TYPE CODES
Code System Type
Code System Type
METALS RECOVERY (FOR REUSE)
MO 11 High temperature metals recovery
MO 12 Retorting
MO 13 Secondary smelting
M014 Other metals recovery for reuse: e.g., ion
exchange, reverse osmosis, acid leaching, etc.
(Specify in Comments)
MO 19 Metals recovery - type unknown
SOLVENTS RECOVERY
nonsolvent organics recovery, etc. (Specify in
Comments)
M039 Other recovery - type unknown
INCINERATION
M041 Incineration - liquids
M042 Incineration - sludges
M043 Incineration - solids
M044 Incineration - gases
M049 Incineration - type unknown
ENERGY RECOVERY (REUSE AS FUEL)
M051 Energy recovery - liquids
M052 Energy recovery - sludges
M053 Energy recovery - solids
M059 Energy recovery - type unknown
FUEL BLENDING
M061 Fuel blending
AQUEOUS INORGANIC TREATMENT
M071 Chrome reduction followed by chemical
precipitation
M072 Cyanide destruction followed by chemical
precipitation
M073 Cyanide destruction only
M074 Chemical oxidation followed by chemical
precipitation
M075 Chemical oxidation only
M076 Wet air oxidation
M077 Chemical precipitation
M078 Other aqueous inorganic treatment: e.g.,
ion exchange, reverse osmosis, etc. (Specify
in Comments)
M021 Fractionation/distillation
M022 Thin film evaporation
M023 Solvent extraction
M024 Other solvent recovery (Specify in
Comments)
M029 Solvents recovery - type unknown
OTHER RECOVERY
M031 Acid regeneration
M032 Other recovery: e.g., waste oil recovery,
M079 Aqueous inorganic treatment - type
unknown
AQUEOUS ORGANIC TREATMENT
M081 Biological treatment
M082 Carbon adsorption
M083 Air/steam stripping
M084 Wet air oxidation
M085 Other aqueous organic treatment (Specify in
Comments)
M089 Aqueous organic treatment - type unknown
AQUEOUS ORGANIC AND INORGANIC
TREATMENT
M091
M092
M093
M094
M099
Chemical precipitation in combination with
biological treatment
Chemical precipitation in combination with
carbon adsorption
Wet air oxidation
Other organic/inorganic treatment (Specify
in Comments)
Aqueous organic and inorganic treatment -
type unknown
SLUDGE TREATMENT
M101 Sludge dewatering
M102 Addition of excess lime
Ml 03 Absorption/adsorption
Ml04 Solvent extraction
Ml09 Sludge treatment - type unknown
E-12
-------
SYSTEM TYPE CODES
Code System Type
STABILIZATION
Mill Stabilization/Chemical fixation using
cementitious and/or pozzolanic materials
M112 Other stabilization (Specify in Comments)
M119 Stabilization - type unknown
OTHER TREATMENT
M121 Neutralization only
Ml22 Evaporation only
Ml23 Settling/clarification only
Ml24 Phase separation (e.g., emulsion breaking,
filtration) only
M125 Other treatment (Specify in Comments)
M129 Other treatment - type unknown
DISPOSAL
M131 Land treatment/application/farming
M132 Landfill
Ml33 Surface impoundment (to be closed as a
landfill)
Ml 34 Deepwell/underground injection
M135 Direct discharge to sewer/POTW (no prior
treatment)
M136 Direct discharge to surface water under
NPDES (no prior treatment)
M137 Other disposal (Specify in Comments)
TRANSFER FACILITY STORAGE
M141 Transfer facility storage, waste was shipped
off site with no on-site TDK activity
E-13
-------
Attachment E-2
RCRA Biennial Report System
QUANTITY CONVERSION AND NORMALIZATION
Biennial report quantities are reported and stored as a numeric quantity value with associated
unit of measure information. When the unit of measure is volumetric (gallons, liters, or cubic
yards) a density value and density unit of measure (pounds per gallon or specific gravity) are
also stored.
Prior to performing arithmetic operations such as addition, reported quantities must be converted
to a common unit of measure. This process is called quantity normalization. Most biennial
report analysis uses English short tons as the common unit of measure. A short ton is equal to
2000 pounds.
The quantity normalization process used for non-volumetric quantities (pounds, short tons,
kilograms or metric tons) is different than the process used to normalize volumetric quantities.
Both processes are described below.
Quantities with non-volumetric units of measure (pounds, short tons, kilograms or metric tons)
are normalized to short tons by multiplying the reported quantity value by a conversion factor.
The conversion factors are determined by the unit of measure reported with the quantity and are
provided in Table I below.
SOURCE: U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste, Instruction Manual for the Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
NTISData Tape, April 1995.
E-14
-------
Table I Short Tons Conversion Table. A Short Ton is equal to 2000 pounds.
When
Unit of Measure is
Where: Qv = Quantity Value & Sg = Specific Gravity
The Short Tons (2000lb) Conversion formula is
Pounds
(1)
Short Tons = Qv X 0.0005
Short Tons
(2)
Short Tons = Qv X 1
Kilograms
(3)
Short Tons = Qv X 0.001102499366063
Metric Tons
Gallons
(4)
Short Tons = Qv X 1.102535832415
Short Tons = Qv X Sg X 0.004170141784821
Short Tons - Qv X Sg X 0.001102499366063
Short Tons - Qv X Sg X 0.84
Reporters may report quantities using a variety of units of measure. Before performing arithmetic
operations, quantities must be converted to a common unit of measure. EPA uses English Tons as
the common unit of measure because the quantities of wastes reported total over in the hundreds
of millions of tons.
Quantities with volumetric units of measure are normalized to short tons in a three step process.
The first step of the process normalizes density to a common unit measure (specific gravity - sg).
Density is normalized by multiplying the reported density value by a conversion factor. The
conversion factor is determined by the density unit of measure reported with the density value.
When the density unit of measure is pounds per gallon, the density value is multiplied by
0.1199040767386. When the density unit of measure is specific gravity, there is no conversion
necessary. See Table II, below.
SOURCE: U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste, Instruction Manual for the Biennial Reporting Svstem (BRS)
NTISData Tape, April 1995.
E-15
-------
Table II Density Conversion Table. A specific gravity of 1.0 equals 8.34 pounds per gallon.
When Density
Unit of Measure is
Pounds/Gallon (1)
Specific Gravity(2)
The
Sg-
Sg-
Where:Dv - Density Value & Sg -
Specific Gravity Conversion formula is
- DvX 0.1199040767386
= DvX1
Specific Gravity
Reporters are allowed to report density in either pounds per gallon or specific gravity. Before
performing aggregations of quantities, all densities should be converted to a common density measure.
The second step applies a range restriction to density. When the reported density is not within a
range considered plausible, a density of water(lsg) is assigned. The plausible range includes
solvents (0.40sg) at the lower and mercury (IS.Osg) at the upper boundary. This step is optional,
but should be applied when there is a desire to match EPA's calculations. See Table III, below.
Table HI Density Adjustment Table. The specific gravity water is 1.0.
When
Specific Gravity is
Sg<- 0.40
(Density < Solvents)
Sg>-15.0
(Density > Mercury)
The
Sg-
Sg-
Where:Dv - Density Value & Sg
Specific Gravity Adjustment formula is
- 1
=- 1
- Specific Gravity
Density adjustment assigns the density of water to -wastes having a reported density that is outside
of a range considered plausible.
The third step multiplies the quantity value, normalized density and a short tons conversion
factor to produce the short ton equivalent. Again, the conversion factor is determined by the
quantity unit of measure reported with the quantity value. The conversion factors are provided
in Table I, above.
SOURCE: U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste, Instruction Manual for the Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
NTISData Tape, April 1995.
E-16
-------
APPENDIX F
Verification of Assembly Plant Location Coordinates
Latitude and longitude coordinates ("lat/longs") reported by assembly plants as part of their
TRI submissions were used to locate plants. EPA has developed a review process for lat/long
coordinates which results in selection of "preferred" lat/longs where the submitted coordinates
appear to be in error.1 For this project, we conducted a further review of the preferred lat/longs for
each assembly plant, which resulted in further adjustments for some plants. Based on the results of
this review, EPA is planning to revise its method for developing preferred lat/longs for facilities with
large-area sites. This appendix describes the method used by the Project Team to review the
preferred lat/longs.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maps (1:24,000-scale) were used to identify the approximate
location of each assembly plant, based on its street address. These maps each encompass a 7.5 x 7.5
minute area (approximately 60 square miles). Then, a local party (fire department, police
department, zoning board, planning commission or city hall) was contacted by phone and asked to
describe the precise location of the assembly plant. For 41 of the 56 plants, the actual factory
building(s) were displayed on the maps. The remaining 15 plants were not shown directly, perhaps
because the plants had been constructed after the most recent map update by USGS. In each of these
15 cases, a second local contact was made to ensure that we had accurately identified the plant's
location.
Once the plant locations on the maps were verified, lat/longs were plotted using a coordinate
plotting tool. New, corrected lat/longs were substituted for EPA's preferred lat/longs only where
the preferred lat/longs were (1) more than 200 meters from the plant, (2) were not on plant property,
or (3) (in one case) were not available from the EPA preferred coordinates list to begin with. The
resulting lat/longs used in this report are therefore those provided by EPA (where the preferred
values were retained) or corrected coordinates representing the approximate center of the plant site.
These adjustments were reviewed by Loren Hall, the EPA contact for the lat/long verification
process.
1 Updated TRI Location Data Quality Assurance and Release Notes for 1987-1993 GIS Coverages,
prepared for U.S. EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics by ViGYAN Inc., July 19, 1995
F-l
-------
The preferred coordinates were retained for 29 of the 56 plants, 26 plants were assigned a
corrected lat/long, and one plant without a preferred lat/long to begin with was assigned a lat/long.
Comparison of the preferred and corrected lat/longs for the 26 plants indicates that ten of the
corrected lat/longs were within 0.5 miles of the preferred lat/longs, four were within 0.51 -1.0 miles,
seven were within 1.01-2.0 miles, and five were adjusted by more than 2.0 miles. The attached table
presents the results of this review.
Reported lat/longs may be in error for a number of reasons, including transcription errors,
rounding (e.g., not reporting seconds or decimals), or use of inaccurate maps. There is error inherent
in any map-derived lat/longs, even after the review described here.2 Users of this document should
be aware that even the corrected lat/longs are accurate only within a range of feet or meters.
Furthermore, especially for large-area sites like assembly plants, different lat/long coordinates might
be preferred for different purposes. For example, coordinates may differ for the plant gate, the
"flagpole" (center of the plant property) and various emissions sources within the plant. Calculations
of demographic and environmental data for areas centered around plant lat/long coordinates should
therefore be viewed as approximations.
2 More accurate methods of determining coordinates requires use of the satellite-based Geographic
Positioning System (GPS) with post-processing to correct for "selective availability" (errors deliberately
introduced for military security reasons.) This level of effort was beyond the scope of this project.
F-2
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
bb
56
NAME
NUMMI
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Diamond Star
General Motors
Subaru-lsuzu
General Motors
General Motors
Toyota Motor M
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
General Motors
Auto Alliance III.
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
=ord Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Chrysler Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
Honda
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
Honda
General Motors
Chrysler Corp.
Chrysler Corp.
General Motors
BMW*
Nissan Motor MFG.
General Motors
General Motors
Ford Motor Co.
General Motors
STATE, CITY
CA, Fremont
DE, Newark
DE, Wilmington
GA, Doraville
GA, Hapeville
IL, Belvidere
IL, Chicago
IL, Normal
IN, Fort Wayne
IN, Lafayette
KS, Kansas City
KY, Bowling Green
KY, Georgetown
KY, Louisville
KY, Louisville
LA, Shreveport
MD, Baltimore
Ml, Dearborn
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Detroit
Ml, Flat Rock
Ml, Flint
Ml, Flint
Ml, Lake Orion
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Lansing
Ml, Pontiac
Ml, Sterling Heights
Ml, Warren
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wayne
Ml, Wixom
MN, St. Paul
MO, Claycomo
MO, St. Louis
MO, St. Louis
MO, Wentzville
NJ, Edison
NJ, Linden
NY, N. Tarrytown
OH, Avon Lake
OH, E. Liberty
OH, Lorain
OH, Lordstown
OH, Marysville
OH, Moraine
OH, #1 Toledo
OH, #2 Toledo
OK, Oklahoma City
SC, Greer
TN, Smyrna
TN, Spring Hill
TX, Arlington
VA, Norfolk
Wl, Janesville
TRI
PREFERRED
LATITUDE
(degrees N)
37 30' 37"
39 40' 0"
3943'29"
3354-15"
33 391 24"
42 14' 19"
41 39' 58"
403V35"
40 57' 37"
4022'41"
399'15"
37 0' 33"
38 16' 1"
38 18' 16"
38 9' 26"
32 29' 27"
3915'58"
42 18' 30"
42 22' 25"
42 22' 9"
42 24' 23"
42 5' 36"
4259'15"
43 2' 6"
4243'10"
4244-15"
42 431 27"
42 37' 17"
42 33- 57"
42 43' 56"
42 16' 42"
4216-41"
42 29' 42"
44 54' 50"
3912'7"
38 32' 38"
3846'23"
38 48' 30"
40 30' 39"
40 37' 2"
41 5' 0"
41 29' 7"
4019'41"
41 25' 30"
41 8' 34"
4017-7"
394V49"
41 40' 34"
41 40' 49"
35 37' 0"
35 57' 47"
35 44' 38"
32 441 6"
36 49' 59"
42 39' 55"
TRI
PREFERRED
LONGITUDE
(degrees W)
121 59' 20"
75 45' 30"
75 36' 32"
84 17' 15"
84 24- 48"
88 51' 6"
87 33' 32"
89 3' 37"
85 17' 42"
86 49' 2"
94 36' 12"
86 22' 25"
8430'21"
85 33'24"
85 43' 55"
93 46' 16"
76 32' 36"
83 9' 23"
82 57' 36"
83 3' 53"
83 2' 42"
83 14' 45"
83 42' 49"
83 41' 19"
8315-13"
84 34' 38"
8433'21"
8316'52"
83V47"
8433'17"
8324'41"
8325'1"
83 32' 27"
93 11' 45"
94 29' 30"
90 27' 56"
9021'42"
9048'13"
74 241 31"
7415'8"
73 52' 0"
82 3' 39"
83 34' 22"
8216'51"
80 50- 24"
833V35"
8413'2"
83 34' 30"
83 33' 44"
97 34' 5"
86 29' 43"
86 56' 27"
97 3' 56"
7615'5"
89 1' 9"
PROJECT
CORRECTED
LATITUDE
(degrees N)
37 29' 5"
-
-
-
33 39' 6"
4214'11"
-
403V18"
40 58' 6"
40 22' 53"
-
-
3815'D"
38 18' 16"
-
32 25' 40"
-
-
-
42 22' 22"
4222-51"
42 5' 55"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4227'21"
-
-
4230'15"
-
39 12' 7"
38 32' 50"
3846'15"
38 49' 9"
4031-5"
-
41 5' 0"
41 29' 7"
-
-
41 8' 15"
-
-
41 40' 52"
-
35 23' 40"
34 53' 54"
—
3543-15"
-
36 50' 0"
-
PROJECT
CORRECTED
LONGITUDE
(degrees W)
121 56' 30"
-
-
-
84 24' 9"
885V55"
-
89 3' 33"
85 17' 56"
86 47' 30"
-
-
8431'30"
85 33' 53"
-
93 55' 0"
-
-
-
83 3' 45"
83 2' 30"
83 14' 45"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 21 30"
-
—
83 32' 20"
-
94 28' 45"
90 27' 45"
90 21' 30"
90 49' 26"
74 221 20"
-
73 52' 15"
82 3' 50"
_
—
80 52' 40"
_
—
83 33' 56"
_
97 23' 50"
82 9' 33"
_
8658'15"
_
76 14' 55"
_
DISTANCE
FROM
PREFERRED
(miles)
2.5
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.6
1.3
1.7
0.5
8.0
0.3
1.8
0.3
10+
0.8
1.3
0.3
0.2
1.3
1.8
0.3
0.1
2.3
0.5
8.0
1.3
0.3
* The BMW plant has not yet submitted TRI reports and therefore did not have TRI preferred" location coordinates
F-3
-------
APPENDIX G
Description of Corrections
Project Team members from General Motors, Ford and Chrysler reviewed a draft of the data
in this report and compared the data with their records to check for accuracy. This review was a
substantial help in identifying errors and revealing areas where there might be confusion about the
data. This appendix describes the results of that review.
A number of differences were identified between the TRI data in the report and the data in
the companies' records. Investigation of these differences revealed two primary reasons (other than
errors in transcription) for the discrepancies. First, in some cases there had been revisions submitted
by the companies since the data were pulled from the national TRI database. Because the TRI
database is continually updated, data pulled at different times may be inconsistent. Where this was
the case, the data in this report were updated to the most current values. Second, some apparent
discrepancies were due to use of different sections of the TRI database. Companies in some cases
used Section 8 data to compare with the report data, which are based on Sections 5 and 6 of the TRI
Form R. The report retains the Section 5 and 6 data, for consistency. However, this comparison
illustrated the substantial confusion that can arise due to the presence of similar data categories in
two parts of the TRI data that are defined differently. Confusion could be reduced if TRI reports and
databases accessible to the public were clearly annotated to show which section of the Form R
specific data are drawn from.
Chrysler made changes to the VOC and NOx emissions data that had been obtained from
state contacts. These changes were incorporated in the report. Discussion of the discrepancies with
state contacts revealed that emissions data can differ for a variety of reasons, including delays in
updating state data, different decisions about what parts of a complex facility should be included as
the assembly plant, and state revisions to the data (such as Delaware's practice of increasing
emissions estimates by a standard 15 percent to reflect "rule effectiveness").
The companies suggested a number of changes to the latitude and longitude coordinates,
generally to be consistent with the coordinates they originally submitted with their TRI Form Rs.
This report retains the "preferred" or "corrected" coordinates developed as described in Appendix
F. Review of the suggested corrections showed that in most cases the two alternatives were very
close (e.g., at different points within the plant boundary). The review also illustrated the ambiguity
involved in picking a single location point for large sites such as assembly plants. As noted in
Appendix F, users of the data compiled for areas around plants should be aware that use of different
but equally valid coordinates might show different results (e.g., for population density or number
of area TRI reporters.)
G-l
-------
APPENDIX H
Attainment Status Classifications
Air Quality Control Regions (AQCRs) are classified according to their status with respect
to each of the criteria pollutants for which ambient air quality standards have been established. The
following general classifications are used. Standards for each pollutant are shown below.
• Attainment: Any area (other than an area identified as a nonattainment area,
as defined below) that meets the national primary or secondary ambient air
quality standard for the pollutant.
• Maintenance: An area that has gone from a nonattainment designation to an
attainment designation. These areas have approved maintenance plans in
place which include measures to maintain air quality above the national
standard and contingency measures to implement if an area's air quality fails
to meet the standard.
• Nonattainment: Any area that does not meet (or that contributes to ambient
air in a nearby area that does not meet) the national primary or secondary
ambient air quality standard for the pollutant.
• Unclassifiable: Any area that cannot be classified on the basis of available
information as meeting or not meeting the national primary or secondary
ambient air quality standard for the pollutant.
H-l
-------
STANDARDS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF
AREA AIR QUALITY ATTAINMENT STATUS
BY CRITERIA POLLUTANT
CLASS
Marginal
Moderate
Serious
Severe 1
Severe 2
Extreme
OZONE
LEVEL
(PPM)
.121 up to .138
.138 up to .160
.160 up to.180
.180 up to.190
.190 up to .280
.280 and above
CARBON MONOXIDE
Moderate 9.1 to 16.4
Serious 16.5 and above
For ozone and CO; adjustment possible based on 5% rule
H-2
-------
Classification Process
Attainment
Unclassifiable
Nonattainment
Marginal
\
Moderate
Serious
Severe
Extreme
\
CLASSIFICATION
H-3
-------
APPENDIX I
Methodology for 3-Mile Radius Demographic Profiles
This appendix describes the methods used to compile two types of data for areas surrounding
assembly plants: (1) demographic data taken from the Census of Population for various sized areas
around plants (Census Blocks and circles of 0-1,0-3,1-3, and 3-5 mile radii around plants), and (2)
1994 TRI emissions data for sources located within a three-mile radius. Assembly plant locations
were identified by the lat/long coordinates described in Appendix F. Geographic Information
System (GIS) software was used by EPA Region IV staff to calculate sums for the areas of interest,
as described below.
Demographic Data
All demographic data used were obtained from the 1990 U.S. Census of Population Summary
Tape File version 3 A. The Block Group summary level data were used to calculate populations in
the vicinity of each assembly plant site. Summary levels 040 and 050 were used to extract
comparative data for the states and counties. It was assumed that Census Block populations and their
racial, income and educational attainment characteristics are uniformly distributed within the Census
Block, which allowed estimating numbers of persons in various categories for pieces of Census
Blocks that fall within the target circles around plants
The following are the sources and methods used for each data element:
Total Persons was taken from STF Table P0010001
• Minority Population was calculated by subtracting the reported White
Persons (STF Table P008001) from STF Table P0010001 (Total Persons).
• Educational Attainment for persons aged 18 and older is reported as
percentage not completing high school. This percentage was calculated by
summing the values for STF Tables P0600001 and P0600002, which
represent, respectively, a count of persons who have less than a 9th grade
education and a count of persons having achieved an education between 9th
and 12th grades, inclusive, but not obtaining a diploma. Total educated
persons aged 18 or older was calculated by summing STF Tables P0600001
through P0600007. The percentage was then calculated as:
1-1
-------
100 * {# educated persons without high school diploma}
{Total # educated persons}
• Poverty Level was calculated using the national poverty level income of
$12,500 per four-person household.1 A household consists of either one
person living alone or any group of related or unrelated persons living
together in a single housing unit. The total number of households was
calculated by summing STF Tables P0800001 through P0800025, and the
number of households below the four-person household poverty level was
calculated by summing Tables P0800001, P0800002 and P0800003. The
percent of households below the poverty level was then calculated as:
100 * {# households below poverty level income}
{Total # households}
• Population densities were calculated based on land area only.
Toxics Release Inventory Data
To identify TRI reporters within three miles of each assembly plant, the facility lat/long was
"buffered" with a three mile radius. This buffer was then used to clip from a TRI dataset the sites
within three miles. The TRI coverage was obtained from the national TRI coverages available on
the EPA internet web site.
TRI release data were downloaded from EPA's mainframe using a standard retrieval program.
The fields obtained included TRI ID number, CAS codes, Chemical Name, and Release Type Codes
(M codes). The data were then processed to ensure that only one CAS number/TRI number pair
existed for each chemical released from a particular facility. The fields were then filled in by
inserting values using the original chemical table and a subset table in a relational schema.
1 A more precise estimate of percentages of households below the poverty level would
compare income for each household to the appropriate poverty level income for that size household.
This more accurate calculation could not be performed because data on household income are not
reported hi sufficient detail for reasons of confidentiality. The approximation used may either over-
or understate numbers of households below the poverty level, depending on the size distribution of
households in a particular area.
1-2
-------
APPENDIX J
Plants Closed or Converted 1991 -1994
The following plants operated as assembly plants sometime during the period 1991 through
1994, but were not included in the universe for this report because they had closed or been converted
to non-assembly operations by 1995.
• General Motors, Van Nuys (Los Angeles) CA: produced autos, ceased
assembly after 1991.
• Chrysler, South St. Louis MO: operated in 1991, closed 1992-1994, reopened
1995.
• General Motors, Willow Run MI: produced autos, ceased assembly after
1993.
• General Motors, Pontiac West, Pontiac MI: produced trucks, ceased assembly
after 1994.
J-l
------- |