United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Radiation Programs
Washington DC 20460
EPA 520/5-82-011
April 1981
Radiation
£EPA
Environmental Radiation Data
Report 23-24
(July - December 1980)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL
RADIATION
DATA
REPORT 23 - 24
April 1981
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Radiation Programs
Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility
P. 0. Box 3009
Montgomery, Alabama 36193
-------
Preface
Environmental Radiation Data (ERD) is compiled and distributed
quarterly by the Office of Radiation Programs' Eastern Environmental
Radiation Facility (EERF), Montgomery, Alabama. Data from ERAMS, and
similar networks operated by contributing States, Canada, Mexico, and
the Pan American Health Organization are reported in (ERD).
The Environmental Radiation Ambient Monitoring System (ERAMS)
was established in 1973 by the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Office of Radiation Programs (ORP). The ERAMS is comprised
of nationwide sampling stations that provide air, surface, and
drinking water and milk samples from which environmental radiation
levels are derived. The major emphasis for ERAMS is toward
identifying trends in the accumulation of long-lived radionuclides in
the environment.
Sampling locations are selected to provide the best possible
combination of radiation source monitoring (such as surface water
downstream from a nuclear power reactor) and wide population
coverage.
The radiation analyses performed on these samples include gross
alpha and gross beta levels, as well as specific analyses for uranium
fuel cycle related radionuclides. The latter category includes but
is not limited to uranium, plutonium, iodine, and krypton, which are
released into the environment from stationary sources such as nuclear
power reactors, fuel fabrication and reprocessing plants.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION
DATA
CONTENTS
Page
DATA - Reporting Rationale and Procedures ill
- Table of Reporting Increments and Minimum v
Detectable Levels
DATA - ERAMS
SECTION I. Air Program 1
1. Airborne Particulates 1
and Precipitation
2. Plutonium and Uranium in 11
Airborne Particulates
3. Krypton-85 16
SECTION II. Water Program 17
1. Surface Water 17
2. Drinking Water 20
3. Radon in Drinking Water 33
SECTION III. External Gamma Ambient Monitoring Program 34
-------
SECTION IV. Milk. Program 40
1. Pasteurized Milk 40
2. Tritium in Milk 40
3. Plutonium and Uranium in Milk 62
4. Iodine-129 in Milk 62
5. Carbon-14 in Milk 62
SECTION V. Human Bone Program 63
SECTION VI. Pan American Health Organization 64
(PAHO) Air and Milk Program
DATA - STATE AGENCIES 65
1. California Sampling Program 65
- Air 65
- Milk 76
2. Indiana Pasteurized Milk Program 79
3. Iowa Water Analysis 83
DATA - INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES 135
1. Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring 135
Program
2. Mexican Air Monitoring Program 136
ii
-------
DATA - Reporting Rationale and Procedures
The intent of EPA's Office of Radiation Programs in establishing
the Environmental Radiation Ambient Monitoring System was to provide
continuous, accurate and usable environmental radiation data for the
public. Therefore, new data reporting procedures were developed to
allow better interpretation of the data. The most significant change
in this reporting procedure is that all specific radionuclide
analyses will be reported as the counting results indicate, whether
the number is negative, zero, or positive.
Reporting Rationale
Frequently, concentrations of a radionuclide In environmental
media are close to zero. When the actual concentration of a nuclide
is zero, the net counting results should statistically show a
distribution of negative and positive numbers about zero. This
occurs when the background count is subtracted from a sample which
has only background activity. Prior to July 1975, ERAMS data were
not reported numerically when the results were less than a specified
reporting level or minimum detectable level. The present reporting
procedure allows all the data to be reported and evaluated
statistically without an arbitrary cutoff of small or negative
numbers. This approach will facilitate estimates of bias in the
nuclide analyses and will allow better evaluation of distributions
and trends in environmental data.
When reviewing the data in this report, caution should be
exercised in the interpretation of individual negative values.
Obviously, a negative activity value does not have physical
significance. Such numbers, however, are significant when taken
together with other observations which indicate that the true value
of a distribution is near zero. When an average of several
measurements produces a result less than zero, this indicates a
negative bias in the measurement procedure.
(1) Reported Values
Specific Analyses - All specific radionuclide analyses will
be reported as the counting results indicate, whether the number
is negative, zero, or positive. Numerical values given are as
of sample collection date.
Gross Analyses - The actual value of gross radioactivity
measurements will be reported, unless the value is below the
minimum detectable level (MDL) at the 2 sigma confidence level,
then < minimum detectable level will be reported.
ill
-------
KtDL is defined as the 3 sigma error of the background.
tabulation of MDL's is given in the following table.
(2) Reported Error Terms
Each reported value for specific analyses will be
accompanied by a counting error term at the 2 sigma (95%)
confidence interval. Potassium concentrations are determined by
specific activity analyses. Error terms are therefore reported
as counting errors. At the very low levels characteristic of
most ERAMS measurements, counting error is the greatest
contributor to overall error. ;
(3) Significant Figures
All reported values will be rounded to no more than three
significant figures. The last significant figure will be
increased by one if the figure following is five or greater,
otherwise it is left unchanged.
(4) Reporting Levels
The reporting units, smallest increments for reporting, and
minimum detectable levels for each isotope are shown in table 1.
Smallest increments are sometimes considerably smaller than
minimum detectable amounts to avoid truncation errors in
averaging.
(5) Averages
Averages will be calculated along with appropriate error
terms in an annual summary and analysis of ERAMS data. In
calculating these averages, all values of individual data
including negative numbers will be utilized. Averages will not
be included in ERD quarterly reports.
IV
-------
j . TABLE 1
ERAMS Reporting Increments and Minimum Detectable Levels
for Radionuclide Analyses
Radionuclide
Gross alpha
Gross beta
Tritium
Carbon-14
Krypton-85
Plutonium-238,
239
Uranium-234,
235,238
Radium-226
Strontium-90
Reporting
Media Units
Water
Air
Water
Precipitation
Water
Milk
- Milk
Ambient Air
Air
Milk
Water
Air
Milk
Water
Water
Milk
Water
pCi/1
pCi/m3
pCi/1
nCi/m2
nCi/1
nCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/m3
aCi/m3
pCi/1
pCi/1
aCi/m3
pCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
Reporting
Increments
1 pCi/1
.01 pCi/m3
1 pCi/1
.01 nCi/m2
.1 nCi/1
.1 nCi/1
1 pCi/1
.1 pCi/m3
.1 aCi/m3
.001 pCi/1
.001 pCi/1
.1 aCi/m3
.001 pCi/1
.001 pCi/1
.1 pCi/1
.1 pCi/1
.1 pCi/1
Minimum
Detectable
Levels
2 pCi/1
.01 PCi/m3
1 pCi/1
.01 nCi/m2(a)
.2 nCi/1
.2 nCi/1
15 PCi/l
2 pCi/m3
.015 PCi(b)
per sample
.015 pCi
per sample
.015 pCi
per sample
.015 pCi(b>
per sample
.015 pCi
per sample
.015 pCi
per sample
.1 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
-------
Radionuclide
Strontium-89
Iodine-131
Iodine-129
Iodine-127
Cesium-137
Barium-140
Potassium
Potassium~40
Media
Milk
Milk
Water
Water
(specific
Milk
Milk
Milk
Water
Milk
Water
Milk
Water
Water
Reporting
Units
pCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
radiochemical
fCi/1
g/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
pCi/1
g/1
g/1
pCi/1
Reporting
Increments
1 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
.1 pCi/1
analysis)
.1 fCi/1
10 g/1
1 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
.1 g/1
.1 g/1
1 pCi/1
Minimum
Detectable
Levels
5 pCi/l(c>
10 pCi/l
10 PCi/l(c)
.4 pCi/1
.4 fCi/1
10 g/1
10 pCi/1
10 pCi/1
10 PCi/l
10 PCi/l(c)
.12 g/1
.12 g/1
100 pCi/1
f\
(a) The value in terms of nCi/m would be dependent on precipitation (mm),
(b) This value in terms of pCi/m would be dependent on the air volume.
(c) Activity as of the day of counting.
-------
DATA - EPA
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION
AMBIENT MONITORING SYSTEM (ERAMS)
SECTION I. Air Program
Airborne Particulates and Precipitation
Gross beta radioactivity measurements and certain specific
analyses are performed on air particulates and precipitation samples
as indicator measurements in assessing the general (national) impact.
of all contributing sources on environmental levels of radiation.
Airborne particulates are collected continuously at 22 field
stations representing wide geographic coverage, including present and
potential sources of environmental radioactivity. Collections are
also made at 45 standby stations as needed and/or annually. Sampling
sites are located throughout the United States, Virgin Islands, and
the Panama Canal.
Filters (10-cm charcoal impregnated cellulose) from air samplers
are changed twice weekly and field measurements are made with a G-M
survey meter at 5 hours and 29 hours after collection to allow for
radon and thoron daughter product decay. Field estimates are
reported to appropriate EPA officials by telephone or mail depending
on the activity levels found.
The filters are sent to EERF for more sensitive analyses in a
low background beta counter. Gamma scans are performed on all
filters showing laboratory gross beta counts greater than 1
pCi/m . The lower gross beta values reported for laboratory
measurements are largely due to the decay of radionuclides which
occurred between the times of the field estimates and laboratory
measurements.
Precipitation samples are collected at the 22 field stations
where air filters are collected. These samples are also sent to EERF
where they are composited monthly for tritium, gross beta activity
measurements and gamma scans.
These locations also correspond to airborne particulate and
drinking water sampling locations selected for plutonium analyses.
Plutonium-238, -239, and uranium-234, -235, and -238 analyses are
performed annually on precipitation samples collected during March -
May.
-------
Tables 2-7 present the monthly average gross beta
concentration for airborne participates and precipitation from July -
December 1980. A compilation of individual measurements is available
from the EPA, EERF, Montgomery, AL 36193.
The July - December 1980 for tritium in precipitation samples at
the selected stations are shown in Tables 8-9.
-------
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
FL:MIAMI
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
OH:COLUMBUS
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
TN:KNOXVILLE
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WV:CHARLESTON
TABLE 2
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES AND PRECIPITATION
GROSS BETA CONCENTRATION
JULY 1980
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
PRECIPITATION
# SAM
5-HR FIELD
ESTIMATE
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
9
6
9
8
7
7
8
7
10
8
-8
9
; 9
8
21
9
13
8
3
9
8
9
!H 8
9
2.0
0.1
1.1
0.7
NM
NM
1.0
0.8
4.8
0.7
1.2
0.3
0.3
2.0
2.9
NM
1.6
0.4
0.1
0.6
1.4
1.3
0.2
1.1
0.2
<0.1
0.2
0.3
NM
NM
0.3
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.7
NM
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
<0.1
0.5
0.5
NM
NM
0.5
0.5
1.7
0.4
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.7
1.8
NM
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.1
0.5
EERF LAB
MEASUREMENT
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.18
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.02
0.04
0
<0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
0.01
<0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.02
DEPTH
(mm)
47.5
NS
NS
59.9
180.0
NS
13.3
46.7
29.9
NS
7.3
20.1
37.9
77.5
NS
NS
37.6
99.8
15.0
32.5
NS
100.0
67.5
23.6
ACT.
SPECIFIC
GAMMA ACT.
(nCi/m2) (pCi/1)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
.10
.14
.14
.03
.22
.07
.04
.03
.08
.12
.08
.16
.04
.16
.20
.33
.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR FIELD ESTIMATES - .1 pCi/mJ
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR LAB MEASUREMENT - .01 pCi/m
ND NO GAMMA ACTIVITY DETECTABLE
NS NO SAMPLE
NM NO MEASUREMENT
3
-------
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
FL:MIAMI
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
MI:LANSING
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
OH:COLUMBUS
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA:PITTSBURGH
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
TN:KNOXVILLE
VA:LYNCHGURG
VA .-VIRGINIA BEACH
WV:CHARLESTON
TABLE 3
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES AND PRECIPITATION
GROSS BETA CONCENTRATION
AUGUST 1980
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
# SAM
9
9
9
9
8
8
9
8
7
6
9
8
r 9
5 9
7
r 16
7
13
9
2
9
5
8
JH 6
8
5-HR FIELD
ESTIMATE
MAX MEN AVG
(pCi/m3)
1.0 0.4 0.7
0.1 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 <0.1 0.4
1.3
NM
NM
1.0
1.0
1.1
2.9
1.0
1.2
0.3
0.5
0.8
3.1
NM
2.0
0.3
0.1
1.0
3.0
1.3
0.3
0.7
0.3
NM
NM
0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
NM
0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.8
NM
NM
0.5
0.2
0.5
1.2
0.4
0.9
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.8
NM
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.5
1.6
0.7
0.1
0.3
EERF LAB
MEASUREMENT
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
0.02 0.01 0.02
0.01 <0.01 0.01
0.02 0.01 0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
DEPTH
(mm)
NS
NS
NS
NS
109.0
22.1
66.3
4.8
118.5
45.7
NS
NS
39.0
32.6
72.5
NS
NS
36.3
NS
37.5
126.3
NS
NS
38.8
107.8
PRECIPITATION
ACT.
SPECIFIC
GAMMA ACT.
(nCi/m2) (pCi/1)
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.14
.06
.11
.01
.13
.31
.11
.11
.04
.12
.13
.73
.20
.25
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR FIELD ESTIMATES - .1 pCi/m ,
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR-LAB MEASUREMENT - .01 pCi/nT
ND NO GAMMA ACTIVITY DETECTABLE
NS NO SAMPLE
NM NO MEASUREMENT
-------
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA: BERKELEY
CArLOS ANGELES
CQ:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
FL:MIAMI
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
MI:LANSING
.ND: BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTE FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:SYRACUSE
OH:COLUMBUS
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA:PITTSBURGH
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
TN:KNOXVILLE
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WV:CHARLESTON
TABLE 4
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES AND PRECIPITATION
GROSS BETA CONCENTRATION
SEPTEMBER 1980
AIRBORNE PARTI CULATES
# SAM
5-HR FIELD
ESTIMATE
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
4
9
18
9
12
8
2
9
4
9
H
7
0.6
0.1
0.8
1.4
0.3
NM
NM
0.7
0.4
1.0
3.2
0.7
1.7
0.3
0.3
0.8
1.0
3.7
NM
2.3
0.5
0.1
1.0
0.7
1.0
NS
1.0
0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
NM
NM
0.1
0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.2
NM
0.3
<0.1
0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.7
0..2
NM
NM
0.3
0.2
0.7
1.2
0.5
1.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.6
1.5
NM
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.6
EERF LAB
MEASUREMENT
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.08
0.02
0.04
0
<0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.01
DEPTH
(mm)
45.0
NS
NS
NS
14.8
105.8
19.5
65.6
71.8
49.8
47.9
NS
NS
21.0
69.8
21.0
12.5
NS
52.6
24.1
48.8
75.0
190.0
NS
NS
24.0
22.5
PRECIPITATION
ACT.
SPECIFIC
GAMMA ACT.
(nCl/m2) (pCi/1)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
.09
.06
.11
.04
.08
.07
.10
.17
.07
.09
.02
.03
.11
.02
.10
.15
.25
.12
.03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR FIELD ESTIMATES - .1 pCi/m ,
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR LAB MEASUREMENT - .01 pCi/nf
ND NO GAMMA ACTIVITY DETECTABLE
NS NO SAMPLE
NM NO MEASUREMENT
-------
TABLE 5
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES ^ND PRECIPITATION
GROSS BETA CONCENTRATION
OCTOBER 1980
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA:BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
FL:JACKSONVILLE
FLrMIAMI
HI:HONOLULU
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
KY:FRANKFORT
MI:LANSING
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:YAPHANK
OH:COLUMBUS
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
TN:KNOXVILLE
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WI:MADISON
WV:CHARLESTON
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
// SAM
5-HR FIELD
ESTIMATE
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
17
17
18
19
19
20
13
15
15
20
20
17
15
16
17
10
19
17
20
20
16
17
18
19
21
21
18
14
6
2
14
11
16
H 16
15
19
2.4
1.3
1.9
3.9
4.0
0.9
0.9
0.2
0.5
2.7
NM
1.9
2.0
1.4
1.4
2.4
2.8
5.3
3.3
4.4
0.6
0.6
4.0
3.6
4.0
NM
3.0
1.4
2.3
0.3
2.0
2.0
5.0
0.3
1.4
3.4
0.2
<0.1
0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.2
NM
0.2
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.6
NM
0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.4
1.0
0.6
0.4
2.0
2.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.3
1.3
NM
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.1
1.9
1.6
2.9
0.3
0.3
0.8
1.0
2.3
Nil
1.1
0.6
1.1
0.2
0.9
0.9
1.7
0.2
0.5
1.5
EERF LAB
MEASUREMENT
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.07
0.20
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.22
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.15
0.09
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.11
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.13
0.04
0.05
0.07
0.03
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
DEPTH
(mm)
80.0
19.8
NS
NS
7.8
30.5
18.6
134.6
9.1
0.7
26.4
42.0
42.5
39.7
5.1
19.1
58.9
52.2
NS
0.4
26.2
91.8
2.0
74.0
NS
27.7
37.5
7.0
10.0
62.5
57.5
NS
NS
131.0
10.0
25.0
PRECIPITATION
ACT.
SPECIFIC
GAMMA ACT.
(nCi/m2) (pCi/1)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.10
.03
.10
.12
.02
.13
.01
.01
.05
.11
.09
.12
.01
.07
.52
.08
.01
.05
.15
.01
.21
.06
.14
.01
.02
.06
.11
.45
.01
.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR FIELD ESTIMATES - .1 pCi/mJ
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR LAB MEASUREMENT - .01 PCi/mJ
ND NO GAMMA ACTIVITY DETECTABLE
NS NO SAMPLE
NM NO MEASUREMENT
-------
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA:BERKELEY
CArLOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
FL:JACKSONVILLE
FLrMIAMI
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
MI:LANSING
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:ALBANY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:YAPHANK
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:PAINESVILLE
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA:PITTSBURGH
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
TN:KNOXVILLE
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WV:CHARLESTON
TABLE 6
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES AND PRECIPITATION
GROSS BETA CONCENTRATION
NOVEMBER 1980
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
PRECIPITATION
SAM
13
13
11
11
11
11
13
11
11
13
11-
8
9
12
13
10
13
3
9
12
12
7
11
9
18
13
10
2
10
8
9
7
9
5-HR FIELD
ESTIMATE
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
2.4 0.2 1.3
1.4 0.1 0.4
3.6 0.5 1.5
2.7
0.4
1.4
0.3
2.4
NM
5.2
0.9
1.4
2.2
5.5
6.4
1.9
5.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
2.5
0.7
1.0
4.2
0.6
1.8.
0.8
0.1
3.1
3.6
2.0
0.4
3.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.1
NM
0.2
0.1
o.i
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
1.3
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
1.2
0.2
0.5
0.1
1.2
NM
1.7
0.4
0.6
0.8
2.1
1.5
0.9
2.7
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
2.3
0.1
0.6
0.4
0.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.2
1.5
EERF LAB
MEASUREMENT
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
0.08 0.02 0.04
0.10 0.02 0.05
0.22 0.05 0.10
0.18
0.03
0.11
0.15
0.18
0.12
0.11
0.05
0.13
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.10
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.05
0.12
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.10
0.09
0.30
0.07
0.22
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.02
.01
.03
.01
.02
.01
.02
.02
.04
.03
.02
.02
.02
.03
.01
.02
.01
.02
.03
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.02
.03
.04
.03
.02
.02
0.06
0.02
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.09
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.11
0.03
0.06
DEPTH
(mm)
NS
NS
NS
NS
32.7
47.4
149.0
14.5
NS
10.9
17.9
15.2
10.1
4.7
38.1
NS
NS
NS
42.3
35.9
NS
35.8
13.8
NS
319.7
56.0
35.0
22.5
63.8
NS
100.0
62.5
27.5
ACT.
SPECIFIC
GAMMA ACT.
(nCi/m2) (pCl/1)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
.36
.10
.30
.09
.07
.17
.15
.04
.21
.20
.13
.18
.25
.10
.30
.28
.02
.05
.47
.16
.45
.37
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR FIELD ESTIMATES - .1
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR LAB MEASUREMENT - .01 pCi/m"
ND NO GAMMA ACTIVITY DETECTABLE
NS NO SAMPLE
NM NO MEASUREMENT
-------
TABLE 7
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES AND PRECIPITATION
GROSS BETA CONCENTRATION
DECEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
FL:JACKSONVILLE
FL:MIAMI
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
MI:LANSING
MT:HELENA
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NV:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:PAINESVILLE
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
SC:COLUMBIA
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WV:CHARLESTON
AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
# SAM
5-HR FIELD
ESTIMATE
MAX MIN AVG
EERF LAB
MEASUREMENT
MAX MIN AVG
(pCi/m3)
8
9
9
1
9
7
10
9
9
8
9
8
8
9
9
10
9
8
9
9
14
9
14
7
8
H 2
5
1.7
0.5
1.5
1.0
0.2
1.1
0.4
0.4
NM
0.9
0.2
0.6
1.7
0.9
1.4
3.3
0.2
0.1
0.7
0.2
4.2
0.1
0.9
0.3
1.3
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.1
0.4
1.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
<0.1
NM
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.8
0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
0.2
0.9
1.0
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.2
NM
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.6
1.9
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
1.9
0.4
0.2
0.8
0.2
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(pCi/m3)
.10
.14
.24
.03
.06
.11
.18
.08
.14
.07
.05
.11
.14
.07
.12
.22
.08
.07
.12
.07
.21
.06
.07
.09
.11
.08
.08
0.01
0.05
0.07
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.09
0.14
0.01
0.04
0.08
0.09
0.06
0.10
0.05
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.08
0.12
0.06
0.05
0.07
0.05
0.08
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.07
0.07
0.07
DEPTH
(mm)
67.5
10.6
9.0
3.5
24.3
7.9
4.0
41.3
21.5
51.3
53.6
14.8
7.2
8.1
NS
NS
13.8
4.5
17.5
59.4
NS
165.0
17.0
NS
37.5
53.8
35.0
PRECIPITATION
ACT.
SPECIFIC
GAMMA ACT.
(nCi/m2) (pCi/1)
0.55
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.38
0.03
0.02
0.62
0.17
0.44
0.17
0.15
0.28
0.06
0.19
0.02
0.12
0.74
2.48
0.11
0.19
1.13
0.50
ND
ND
ZR-NB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
106RU
ZR-NB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
106RU
ZR-NB
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.05 + 93.7%
69.49 + 63.6%
7.20 + 93.2%
52.66 + 74.4%
8.31 + 80.5%
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR FIELD ESTIMATES - .1 pCi/m
MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT FOR LAB MEASUREMENT - .01 pCi/ra
ND NO GAMMA ACTIVITY DETECTABLE
NS NO SAMPLE
NM NO MEASUREMENT
-------
TABLE 8
PRECIPITATION
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
FL:MIAMI
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
MI:LANSING
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:SYRACUSE
OH:COLUMBUS
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WV:CHARLESTON
APRIL
nCi/1 + e
0.7 0.2
0.6 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
NS
0.7 0.2
NS
0.7 0.2
0.4 0.2
1.0 0.2
0.6 0.2
0.5 0.2
NS
0.7 0.2
NS
0.6 0.2
0.3 0.2
1.7 0.2
0.4 0.2
0.5 0.2
0.4 0.2
0.4 0.2
MAY
nCi/1 + e
NS
NS
NS
0.3 0.2
0.6 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.4 0.2
0.5 0.2
0.4 0.2
NS
0.6 0.2
0.3 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
NS
0.7 0.2
0.4 0.2
NS
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
JUNE
nCl/1 + e
0.5 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
0.4 0.2
0.5 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.5 0.2
0.5 0.2
0.3 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
0.4 0.2
0.2 0.2
NS
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.5 0.2
0.9 0.2
1.8 0.3
NS
0.4 0.2
0.2 0.2
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
-------
PRECIPITATION
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
OCTOBER - DECEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA:BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
FL:JACKSONVILLE
FLrMIAMI
HI:HONOLULU
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
KY:FRANKFORT
MI:LANSING
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:YAPHANK
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:PAINESVILLE
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:NORFOLK
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WI:MADISON
WV:CHARLESTON
OCTOBER
nCi/1 + e
10.3 0.2
10.3 0.2
NS
NS
10.3 0.2
10.3 0.2
10.1 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.3 0.2
10.3 0.2
10.3 0.2
10.4 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.3 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.3 0.2
10.3 0.2
10.4 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.2 0.2
NS
10.1 0.2
10.4 0.2
10.4 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.4 0.2
10.2 0.2
NS
NS
10.3 0.2
10.2 0.2
10.3 0.2
NOVEMBER
nCi/1 + e
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.3 0.2
0.4 0.2
0.4 0.2
NS
0.2 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
0.5 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
NS
0.5 0.2
0.4 0.2
NS
0.4 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
NS
2.2 0.3
0.5 0.2
0.1 0.2
NS
0.2 0.2
NS
0.5 0.2
DECEMBER
nCi/1 + e
0.2 0.2
NS
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.4 0.2
0.3 0.2
NS
0.2 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.2 0.2
NS
0.3 0.2
NS
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.4 0.2
NS
0.5 0.2
0.5 0.2
NS
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2
NS
NS
NS
0.3 0.2
NS
0.5 0.2
NS
NS
0.5 0.2
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
10
-------
Plutonium and Uranium in Airborne Particulates
Environmental radiation levels of plutonium and uranium are
determined by the analyses of quarterly composite samples (air
filters) collected from the continuously operating airborne
particulate samplers. The number of continuously operating stations
is being increased from the original 22 and will eventually number 65
when all equipment is operational.
Analyses of the composited filters consist of ashing, separating
by liquid ion exchange, and coprecipitation of the plutonium or
uranium.
Concentration of the specific isotopes of plutonium-238, -239,
and uranium-234, -235, and -238 are determined by alpha spectroscopy.
The volume of air analyzed normally ranges from 25,000 to 40,000 m
for each quarterly composite.
Plutonium and uranium in airborne particulates data for April
1980 - September 1980 are shown for the 44 stations operating during
this period in Tables 10 - 11.
Plutonium and uranium in precipitation for July - December 1980
will be included in the next ERD report.
11
-------
TABLE 10
PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
APRIL - JUNE 1980 COMPOSITES
238
Pu
239
Pu
LOCATION ;
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA:BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
COrDENVER
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
FL:JACKSONVILLE
FL:MIAMI
LA:IOWA CITY
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
KS:TOPEKA
KY:FRANKFORT
MA .'LAWRENCE
ME:AUGUSTA
MI:LANSING
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MO:JEFFERSON CITY
MS:JACKSON
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:WILMINGTON
ND:BISMARCK
NH:CONCORD
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:SYRACUSE
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:PAINESVILLE
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR-.PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
RI:PROVIDENCE
iCi/m3+e
0
2
0
4
3
0
1
4
0
3
2
2
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
2
2
1
1
0
1
2
8
1
9
2
4
1
5
0
5
1
0
1
1
.6
.4
.6
.2
.6
.4
.4
.9
.2
.4
.5
.4
.8
.9
.2
.5
.0
.7
.3
.4
.4
.3
.1
.5
.4
.5
.8
.4
.4
.0
.4
.8
.4
.8
.3
.1
.4
.5
.2
0
1,
0,
2
1
0,
1,
2,
1,
3,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
2,
1,
2,
1,
4.
2,
2,
1,
3,
1,
2,
3,
0.
1,
1,
.8
.2
.8
.1
.9
.7
.4
.3
.0
.0
.8
.9
.5
.4
.6
.0
.3
.1
.1
.9
.7
.1
.9
.5
.1
.1
.8
.6
.3
.0
.6
.8
.4
.7
.5
.2
.8
.6
.6
aCi/m3+
7
9
4
9
13
7
7
17
8
9
8
12
7
7
10
15
8
6
7
13
7
8
12
2
11
7
16
11
16
8
12
11
14
7
11
6
9
10
16
.0
.3
.5
.4
.1
.2
.3
.6
.3
.6
.1
.1
.5
.1
.1
.3
.8
.4
.3
.1
.4
.2
.1
.1
.3
.1
.3
.8
.1
.9
.2
.1
.9
.6
.3
.0
.0
.4
.6
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
2
1
2
0
3
1
3
2
4
2
3
2
4
2
2
2
1
2
3
e
.5
.0
.2
.4
.9
.6
.9
.4
.4
.6
.2
.9
.1
.9
.8
.8
.2
.6
.8
.1
.1
.8
.3
.6
.3
.5
.5
.8
.4
.5
.2
.8
.2
.2
.8
.9
.8
.6
.5
239Pu/238Pu
RATIO + e
11.4 14.3
3.9 2.1
7.2 9.4
2.2
3.6
234
U
235
U
238,
1.2
2.1
16.7 28.6
5.3 5.7
3.6 1.9
-44.7237.3
2.8 2.7
3.2
5.1
9.4 17.9
7.9 12.3
8.6 12.3
.5
.5
2.4
4.2
10,
4.
7.5
3.1
3.8 2.6
23.6 84.4
4.4
2.4
5.4
3.1
6.5
10.7
3.8 3.6
8.0 12.4
5.6
8.5
2.9
1.9
8.2
1.7
4.5
2.8
6.1
2.8
9.3
2.1
1.4
0.7
9.2
0.9
4.8
1.8
6.4
1.9
19.1
1.1
-5.2 14.9
23.5 47.1
6.7 7.1
14.2 19.5
aCi/m3+
19
34
7
42
56
16
26
26
23
29
46
57
38
38
27
29
31
24
34
35
32
29
28
15
71
18
32
38
139
42
80
36
57
74
45
63
20
59
.7
.1
.8
.4
.7
.2
.5
.9
.9
.0
.1
.1
.2
.6
.0
.7
.3
.6
.8
.8
.0
.4
.8
.2
.9
.9
.2
.1
.3
.0
.7
.1
.0
.3
.5
.0
.7
.2
4
5
1
7
7
2
4
5
3
7
6
7
7
5
4
4
4
3
5
6
7
4
4
2
10
3
5
5
17
9
11
5
9
12
7
12
3
8
e
.7
.2
.7
.7
.8
.9
.5
.4
.3
.4
.5
.9
.0
.5
.3
.5
.8
.5
.3
.8
.7
.3
.2
.0
.6
.0
.2
.4
.3
.8
.2
.7
.0
.8
.7
.9
.0
.1
aCi/m3+ e
1
2
0
3
6
1
1
2
2
4
5
4
3
2
1
1
5
1
2
3
0
2
1
0
4
3
3
2
11
2
5
1
9
8
6
2
2
12
.8
.8
.8
.0
.2
.3
.4
.0
.0
.0
.2
.5
.7
.6
.9
.9
.2
.6
.4
.9
.7
.1
.8
.7
.5
.0
.7
.5
.4
.8
.5
.9
.4
.5
.0
.5
.9
.9
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
2.
1.
1.
1.
3.
2.
2.
1.
3.
3.
2.
2.
0.
3.
2
2
5
7
9
7
9
2
8
5
7
7
9
1
0
9
6
7
1
9
0
9
8
3
0
0
5
1
6
2
2
1
1
4
3
2
9
0
aCi/m3+
17
34
8
31
51
13
28
26
22
39
40
59
34
43
26
28
26
24
38
39
27
30
26
15
68
19
32
39
95
27
76
39
59
66
38
59
21
64
.0
.7
.4
.0
.3
.7
.7
.8
.0
.3
.5
.2
.7
.6
.7
.4
.7
.6
.0
.0
.5
.0
.6
.4
.9
.9
.9
.2
.3
.4
.3
.2
.5
.7
.4
.1
.4
.2
4
5
1
6
7
2
4
5
3
8
6
8
6
5
4
4
4
3
5
7
7
4
4
2
10
3
5
5
13
7
10
6
9
11
6
12
3
8
e
.2
.3
.8
.3
.3
.6
.8
.3
.2
.9
.0
.1
.6
.9
.3
.4
.3
.5
.7
.2
.0
.4
.0
.0
.2
.1
.3
.5
.1
.5
.8
.0
.2
.8
.9
.4
.1
.6
30.4 5.9
4.5 2.0
28.5 5.7
12
-------
' I '
TABLE 10 (CONTINUED)
PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
APRIL - JUNE 1980 COMPOSITES
238
Pu
239
Pu
LOCATION
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
TNiKNOXVILLE
TX:AUSTIN
TX:EL PASO
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH 0
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WV:CHARLESTON
WY:CHEYENNE
aCi/m3+e
1
1
3
3
5
' 6
1
[ 0
1
0
1
-0
.8
.3
.7
.0
.8
.2
.2
.6
.6
.9
.3
.3
1
1
2
1
4
3
0
1
1
2
1
1
.9
.4
.4
.4
.2
.1
.9
.0
.2
.1
.2
.5
aCi/m3+
10
11
11
9
13
12
8
11
4
7
11
12
.3
.3
.1
.4
.1
.0
.0
.4
.2
.7
.8
.8
2
2
3
2
4
3
1
2
1
2
2
3
e
.7
.5
.1
.0
.0
.3
.7
.4
.3
.5
.5
.5
239Pu/238Pu
RATIO + e
5.7 6.2
9.0 10.6
.0
3.
3.2
2.3
1.9
6.8
17.6
2.5
8.3 19.0
9.4 9.0
-48.0264.6
2.1
1.6
1.8
1.1
5.3
28.5
2.0
aCi/m3+
27
54
49
18
96
50
187
41
11
62
39
34
.1
.3
.4
.8
.7
.9
.8
.5
.2
.7
.5
.9
4
7
7
3
13
8
21
7
2
10
7
5
e
.9
.3
.7
.0
.9
.2
.6
.1
.9
.1
.1
.2
aCi/m3+ e
5
4
4
1
9
3
8
1
2
5
3
2
.6
.9
.5
.8
.2
.0
.6
.9
.1
.1
.6
.8
2
1
1
0
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
.0
.7
.9
.8
.5
.7
.1
.2
.2
.4
.7
.2
aCi/m3+
24
60
37
16
94
39
18
38
13
62
37
39
.7
.6
.1
.1
.9
.2
.3
,5
.2
.2
.8
.4
4
8
6
2
13
6
3
6
3
10
6
5
e
.6
.0
.3
.7
.7
.9
.4
.8
.2
.1
.9
.7
PLUTONIUM RATIOS ARE CALCULATED ON UNROUNDED RAW VALUES.
OOQ 23Q
THE Pu AND Pu CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED IN THIS TABLE HAVE BEEN ROUNDED.
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
13
-------
TABLE 11
PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980 COMPOSITES
238
Pu
239
Pu
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
ARtLITTLE ROCK
AZ:PHOENIX
CA:BERKELEY
CAtLOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
FL:JACKSONVILLE
FL:MIAMI
IA:IOWA CITY
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
KS:TOPEKA
KY:FRANKFORT
MA:LAWRENCE
ME:AUGUSTA
MI:LANSING
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MO:JEFFERSON CITY
MS:JACKSON
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:WILMINGTON
ND:BISMARCK
NH:CONCORD
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:SYRACUSE
NY:YAPHANK
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:TOLEDO
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
RI:PROVIDENCE
aCl/m3+e
1
4
8
4
11
0
0
2
1
1
11
1
3
9
2
0
2
2
1
1
1
0
6
4
1
-0
1
4
1
.3
.3
.1
.7
.6
.6
.7
.9
.0
.8
.6
.7
.6
.7
.7
.5
.8
.2
.3
.2
.5
.9
.1
.9
.7
.1
.2
.9
.3
0,
2,
3,
2,
2,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
6,
0,
1,
4,
1,
-1,
1,
1,
0,
1,
1,
0,
2,
1,
0,
1,
0,
2,
0,
.8
.3
.8
.4
.3
.8
.8
.7
.0
.1
.4
.9
.6
.2
.1
.0
.3
.2
.9
.2
.2
.8
.6
.6
.8
.2
.9
.0
.9
aCi/m3+
3
3
4
4
3
5
4
5
4
2
9
4
5
8
3
1
5
6
3
4
5
4
6
4
1
6
4
8
3
.3
.5
.0
.1
.9
.0
.3
.6
.6
.2
.9
.5
.1
.8
.4
.9
.8
.1
.8
.6
.0
.2
.7
.3
.3
.2
.1
.9
.9
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
2
1
e
.9
.5
.6
.3
.1
.3
.2
.7
.3
.8
.2
.5
.9
.6
.3
.8
.6
.5
.1
.6
.5
.1
.1
.2
.5
.8
.1
.2
.1
NA
1
0
5
0
3
6
2
1
1
3
2
.1
.8
.9
.7
.4
.7
.3
.9
.2
.2
.1
0,
1,
3,
1,
1,
3,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
.9
.0
.0
.4
.3
.2
.9
.0
.3
.8
.0
5
6
2
2
4
6
4
2
6
2
5
.5
.4
.9
.0
.6
.4
.4
.2
.0
.8
.9
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
.4
.6
.4
.0
.6
.1
.6
.1
.0
.2
.4
239Pu/238Pu
RATIO + e
235
U
2.7
0.8
0.5
0.9
.7
.1
4.6
1.2
0.9
2.7
1.4
0.9
1.3
3.7
2.1
2.7
2.9
4.0
3.2
4.7
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.9
0.6
0.4
0.
0.
9.6
6.8
1.3
4.8
0.9
0.7
1.7
0.8
.5
.7
0.
0.
7.3
1.1
1.6
2.1
4.4
2.6
4.2
0.6
0.4
0.5
-51.8512.4
3.5 2.8
1.8 0.9
3.0
NA
5.1
7.5
0.5
3.0
1.4
0.9
1.9
1.2
5.2
2.2
4.6
8.8
0.3
6.4
0.7
0.6
1.7
0.8
5.9
0.9
2.8
0.6
1.5
aCi/m3+ e
14.9
38.5
183.0
15.4
32.5
49.3
17.3
21.5
25.3
22.8
26.3
52.0
49.8
30.2
38.7
20.4
19.2
22.8
14.4
22.4
22.6
28.2
25.5
34.2
7.3
39.2
19.5
27.4
35.1
144.1
23.4
51.6
28.9
12.0
54.8
7.8
56.6
34.7
17.1
36.4
16.7
3.2
6.9
29.5
2.9
4.0
7.5
3.0
5.1
4.3
3.7
3.5
7.5
6.2
3.6
4.7
3.4
4.5
3.8
2.7
3.5
3.1
4.4
4.5
6.2
1.7
6.0
3.2
5.5
5.0
26.1
3.7
7.0
6.1
2.9
6.6
1.0
8.4
5.8
3.2
5.5
3.7
aCi/m3+ e
1.3 0.8
2.3 1.4
18.9 7.6
1.6 0.8
1.5 0.6
3.3 1.3
1.4 0.7
1.6 1.2
2.9 1.2
2.4 1.0
2.4 0.8
7.7 2.4
4.7 1.4
2.5 0.8
3.5 1.0
1.2 0.7
1.5 1.1
1.5 0.8
1.5 0.8
0.5 0.4
1.3 0.6
1.9 0.9
1.2 0.8
1.4 1.0
0.4 0.4
3.1 1.4
1.1 0.6
3.2 1.7
2.2 0.9
5.7 4.1
2.8 1.1
2.3 1.0
1.8 1.3
2.1 1.1
3.8 1.3
0.5 0.2
2.2 1.3
2.3 1.2
2.1 1.0
5.2 1.7
2.3 1.2
aCi/n>3+ e
15.1
40.0
184.5
10.8
31.9
43.8
14.6
14.3
27.5
23.7
21.9
40.4
46.6
27.7
34.2
20.4
15.8
26.9
13.8
19.6
25.1
29.8
24.7
35.9
5.7
33.2
16.1
25.9
32.3
96.5
25.4
47.4
30.1
13.3
52.5
7.5
43.8
28.4
18.0
44.9
16.3
3.2
7.1
29.7
2.3
3.9
6.8
2.7
4.0
4.5
3.8
3.1
6.3
5.9
3.4
4.3
3.4
3.9
4.3
2.6
3.2
3.3
4.6
4.4
6.4
1.5
5.4
2.8
5.3
4.7
19.9
4.0
6.5
6.2
3.0
6.4
0.9
7.0
5.1
3.3
6.4
3.7
14
-------
:TABLE 11 (CONTINUED)
PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980 COMPOSITES
238
Pu
239
Pu
LOCATION ;
SCrBARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
TNrKNOXVILLE
TX:AUSTIN
TX:EL PASO
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WV:CHARLESTON
WY:CHEYENNE
.Ci/m3+e
5
2
2
3
3
1
1
3
1
.7
.5
.2
.0
.7
.1
.7
.7
.0
2
1
1
1
2
0
0
1
0
.6
.1
.6
.6
.9
.6
.9
.8
.5
aCi/m
6
5
5
4
5
5
6
4
1
.0
.4
.9
.4
.0
.4
.3
.8
.7
3±
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
e
.7
.3
.8
.4
.1
.4
.4
.5
.6
NA
7
.6
1
.8
4
.1
1
.1
239Pu/238Pu
RATIO + e
234,
235,
238,
1.0
2.2
2.6
1.4
1.3
5.1
3.6
1.3
1.7
NA
2.4 1.4 12.2 3.5
0.5
5.0
0.7
1.1
2.0
0.9
1.2
3.1
2.1
0.7
1.0
0.2
3.3
aCi/m3+ e
53.7
43.3
37.5
22.5
81.0
57.6
96.7
54.7
11.6
65.9
24.6
75.6
9.9
6.1
5.6
3.9
12.8
6.6
12.6
8.4
2.1
14.7
4.4
10.8
LCi/m3+ e
2
1
2
1
4
3
5
2
0
2
1
.8
.9
.3
.1
.2
.5
.1
.7
.9
.5
.3
2
0
1
0
2
1
1
1
0
2
0
.0
.9
.1
.7
.3
.1
.7
.4
.5
.5
.8
aCi/m3+
52
43
30
20
74
55
11
47
11
70
22
.7
.7
.7
.7
.7
.5
.4
.9
.3
.9
.4
9
6
4
3
12
6
2
7
2
15
4
e
.8
.1
.8
.7
.1
.4
.7
.6
.1
.4
.1
6.3 2.6
73.4 10.6
PLUTONIUM RATIOS ARE CALCULATED ON UNROUNDED RAW VALUES.
238 219
THE Pu AND J7Pu CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED IN THIS TABLE HAVE BEEN ROUNDED.
NA NOT AVAILABLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
15
-------
Krypton-85
Krypton-85 is a long-lived noble gas with a half life of 10.8
yearso It is released into the atmosphere by nuclear reactor
operations, fuel fabrication, fuel reprocessing, and nuclear
detonations. Krypton-85 also occurs naturally in minor quantities
primarily from the neutron capture of stable krypton-84 as well as
spontaneous fission and neutron-induced fission of uranium.
Monitoring of krypton-85 in the atmosphere has been conducted to
identify and establish baseline levels and long-term trends.
Krypton-85 analysis began in January 1973 with sample
collections and analyses being performed for 12 sampling locations.
These locations were selected to provide atmospheric coverage of the
United States with considerations being given to the proximity .to
fuel reprocessing plants, nuclear reactors, and wide geographic
coverage.
Dry compressed air samples, collected at each location, are
purchased from commercial air suppliers semiannually and shipped to
the EERF where the krypton-85 is cryogenically separated and counted
in a liquid scintillation system.
Data for January - June 1976 were reported in ERD 8.
Note. The recovery tracer required for the analysis of these
samples is currently unavailable. When the tracer is available or
new methodology developed, the samples received after June 1976 will
be analyzed and reported in this report series.
-------
DATA - EPA
ERAMS
SECTION II. Water Program
The ERAMS water program provides ambient radiation data to
assess the effects of the nuclear power industry, the natural
radiation environment, and other nuclear sources on the nation's
rivers, streams and drinking water supplies.
Surface Water
Grab samples are taken quarterly at 58 stations located
downstream from operating or future nuclear facilities.
Surface water monitoring consists of tritium analyses quarterly
and gamma scans annually. Tritium is the primary radioactive
pollutant from nuclear power plants, therefore, all nuclear power
plants that are operating or scheduled for operation through 1980 are
being monitored.
Tritium concentrations are determined by liquid scintillation
counting of distilled samples. Gamma scans are performed annually to
determine if there is a buildup of other contaminants.
Tritium concentrations for surface water samples for July
December 1980 are given in Tables 12-13.
17
-------
TABLE 12
SURFACE WATER
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
LOCATION
AL:DOTHAN
AL:SCOTTSBORO
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA:CLAY STATION
CA:CLAY STATION
CA:DIABLO CANYON
CA:EUREKA
CArSAN ONOFRE
COrGREELEY
CTrEAST HADDAM
CT:WATERFORD
FL:CRYSTAL RIVER
FL:FT. PIERCE
FL:HOMESTEAD .
IA:CEDAR RAPIDS
IA:CEDAR RAPIDS
ID:BUHL
IL:MOLINE
IL:MORRIS
IL:ZION
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA:PLYMOUTH
MA:ROWE
MD:CONOWINGO
MD:LUSBY
ME:WISCASSET
MI:BRIDGMAN
MI:CHARLEVOIX
MI:MONROE
MI:SOUTH HAVEN
MN:MONTICELLO
MN:RED WING
MS:PORT GIBSON
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC: SOUTHPORT
NJ:BAYSIDE
NJ:OYSTER CREEK
NV:BOULDER CITY
NY:OSWEGO
NY:POUGHKEEPSIE
OH:TOLEDO
OR:BRADWOOD
PA:DANVILLE
SC:ALLENDALE
SC:BROAD RIVER
SC:HARTSVILLE
TN:DAISY
TN-.KINGSTON
TN:KINGSTON
TX:EL PASO
VA:DOSWELL
VA:NEWPORT NEWS
VT:VERNON
WA:NORTHPORT
WA:RICHLAND
WI:TWO CREEKS
WI:VICTORY
WV:WHEELING
JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980
SOURCE
CHATTAHOOCHIE RIVER
TENNESSEE RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
FOLSOM S. CANAL
FOLSOM S. CANAL
PACIFIC OCEAN
HUMBOLDT BAY
PACIFIC OCEAN
SOUTH PLATTE RIVER
CONNECTICUT RIVER
LONG ISLAND SOUND
GULF OF MEXICO
ATLANTIC OCEAN
BISCAYNE BAY
CEDAR RIVER
CEDAR RIVER
SNAKE RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
ILLINOIS RIVER
LAKE MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CAPE CODE BAY
DEERFIELD RIVER
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER
CHESAPEAKE BAY
MONTSEWAY BAY
LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE ERIE
LAKE MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CATAWBA RIVER
ATLANTIC OCEAN
DELAWARE RIVER
OYSTER CREEK
COLORADO RIVER
LAKE ONTARIO
HUDSON RIVER
LAKE ERIE
COLUMBIA RIVER
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER
SAVANNAH RIVER
BROAD RIVER
LAKE ROBINSON
TENNESSEE RIVER
CLINCH RIVER
CLINCH RIVER
RIO GRANDE
NORTH ANNA RIVER
JAMES RIVER
CONNECTICUT RIVER
COLUMBIA RIVER
COLUMBIA RIVER
LAKE MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
OHIO RIVER
DATE
COLLECTED
7/15/80
II 7/80
7/ 8/80
II 7/80
II 7/80
7/14/80
II 7/80
7/31/80
7/23/80
7/29/80
7/29/80
II 7/80
7/ 8/80
7/31/80
II 1/80
9/30/80
II 7/80
7/23/80
7/ 1/80
8/ 1/80
II 3/80
7/ 9/80
7/30/80
7/15/80
II 8/80
II 1/80
7/ 7/80
II 5/80
7/ 7/80
II 9/80
7/29/80
7/15/80
II 3/80
7/14/80
II 1/80
7/10/80
7/23/80
7/15/80
77 1/80
7/16/80
II 2/80
7/31/80
7/28/80
7/17/80
7/ 9/80
7/14/80
II 8/80
II 2/80
9/30/80
7/10/80
7/14/80
7/15/80
7/20/80
8/ 6/80
7/ 1/80
7/14/80
7/15/80
7/ 7/80
nCi/1
0.3
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0,
0,
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.4
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
.5
.5
.3
.5
0.
0.
2.4
0.3
1.1
0.4
0.
0.
0.3
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
.2
.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.
0.
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.
0.
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
.2
.2
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
18
-------
LOCATION
ALrDECATUR
AL: GORDON
AL:SCOTTSBORO
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CArCLAY STATION
CArDIABLO CANYON
CA:EUREKA
CA:EUREKA
CA:SAN ONOFRE
CO:GREELEY
CT:EAST HADDAM
CT:WATERFORD
FL:CRYSTAL RIVER
FL:FT. PIERCE
FL:HOMESTEAD
IA:CEDAR RAPIDS
ID:BUHL
IL:MARSEILLES
IL:MOLINE
IL: MORRIS
IL.-ZION
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA .-PLYMOUTH
MA:ROWE
MD:CONOWINGO
MD:LUSBY
ME:WISCASSET
MI:BRIDGMAN
MI.-CHARLEVOIX
MI:MONROE
MI:SOUTH HAVEN
MN:MONTICELLO
MN:RED WING
MS .-PORT GIBSON
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:SOUTHPORT
NE:RULO
NJ:BAYSIDE
NJ:OYSTER CREEK
NV:BOULDER CITY
NV:BOULDER CITY
NY:OSSINING
NY:OSWEGO
NY:POUGHKEEPSIE
OH:TOLEDO
OR:BRADWOOD
PA:DANVILLE
SC:ALLENDALE
SC:BROAD RIVER
SC:HARTSVILLE
TN:DAISY
TX:EL PASO
TX:MATAGORDA
VA:DOSWELL
VT:VERNON
WA:NORTHPORT
WA:RICHLAND
WI:TWO CREEKS
WI:VICTORY
WV:WHEELING
TABLE 13
SURFACE WATER
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
OCTOBER - DECEMBER 1980
SOURCE
TENNESSEE RIVER
CHATTAHOOCHIE RIVER
TENNESSEE RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
FOLSOM S. CANAL
PACIFIC OCEAN
HUMBOLDT BAY
HUMBOLDT BAY
PACIFIC OCEAN
SOUTH PLATTE RIVER
CONNECTICUT RIVER
LONG ISLAND SOUND
GULF OF MEXICO
ATLANTIC OCEAN
BISCAYNE BAY
CEDAR RIVER
SNAKE RIVER
ILLINOIS RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
ILLINOIS RIVER
LAKE MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CAPE CODE BAY
DEERFIELD RIVER
SUSOUEHANNA RIVER
CHESAPEAKE BAY
MONTSEWAY BAY
LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE ERIE
LAKE MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CATAWBA RIVER
ATLANTIC OCEAN
MISSOURI RIVER
DELAWARE RIVER
OYSTER CREEK
COLORADO RIVER
COLORADO RIVER
HUDSON RIVER
LAKE ONTARIO
HUDSON RIVER
LAKE ERIE
COLUMBIA RIVER
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER
SAVANNAH RIVER
BROAD RIVER
LAKE ROBINSON
TENNESSEE RIVER
RIO GRANDE
COLORADO RIVER
NORTH ANNA RIVER
CONNECTICUT RIVER
COLUMBIA RIVER
COLUMBIA RIVER
LAKE MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
OHIO RIVER
DATE
COLLECTED
10/ 9/80
10/16/80
10/10/80
10/20/80
10/14/80
10/17/80
10/23/80
12/31/80
10/22/80
10/23/80
10/ 6/80
10/20/80
10/15/80
12/30/80
10/15/80
12/31/80
11/15/80
12/31/80
10/15/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 6/80
10/31/80
10/ 7/80
10/ 7/80
10/ 7/80
10/15/80
10/18/80
10/13/80
10/15/80
11/13/80
10/20/80
10/10/80
10/ 6/80
10/14/80
11/21/80
10/ 8/80
10/ 2/80
10/15/80
12/30/80
10/ 9/80
10/ 7/80
10/ 8/80
10/ 7/80
10/27/80
10/10/80
10/23/80
10/10/80
10/ 6/80
11/18/80
10/10/80
12/10/80
10/ 9/80
ll/ 3/80
117 5/80
10/ 9/80
10/29/80
10/29/80
10/ 9/80
nCi/1
0.5
0.4
0.4
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.
0.
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0,
0,
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
3.7
0.3
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
+ e
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
19
-------
Drinking Water
The drinking water program provides ambient radiation monitoring
relevant to the effects of the nuclear power industry, natural
environmental insult, and other pertinent sources. These data serve
to assess trends and anomalies in concentrations, and to compare with
standards set forth in the EPA "National Interim Primary Drinking
Water Regulations." These regulations provide for approval of
supplies when the combined radium-226 and radium-228 levels do not
exceed 5 pCi/1, when the gross alpha (excluding radon and uranium)
levels do not exceed 15 pCi/1, when tritium levels do not exceed
20,000 pCi/1, when the strontium-90 levels do not exceed 8 pCi/1, and
when the gross beta levels do not exceed 50 pCi/1.
Grab samples are taken at 78 sites which are either major
population centers or selected nuclear facility environs.
The analyses include (a) tritium on a quarterly basis (b) gross
alpha, gross beta, and strontium-90 on annual composites (gamma
analyses are performed if the gross beta activity is greater than 10
pCi/1; radium-226 analyses are performed if the gross alpha exceeds
2 pCi/1; and radium-228 analyses are performed if the radium-226
activity falls between 3 and 5 pCi/1) (c) specific iodine-131 is
performed on one quarterly sample per year for each station (d) an
annual composite for plutonium-238, -239, uranium-234, -235, -238, on
22 selected sampling locations corresponding to continuously
operating air particulate stations.
Tritium analyses are performed by scintillation counting of the
distilled samples, gross beta, and gross alpha by evaporating an
aliquot on stainless steel planchets for counting, and radium-226 by
the standard emanation technique. Strontium-90 is determined by beta
counting a strontium carbonate precipitate isolated by ion exchange.
The results of tritium in drinking water analyses for July -
December 1980 are shown in Tables 14 - 15.
The annual alpha, beta, gamma, radium, and strontium analyses
for the January - December 1979 annual drinking water samples are
shown in Table 16.
Plutonium and uranium analyses are similar to procedures given
for air particulate samples. Analyses were altered to coincide with
revised EPA standards.
Iodine-131 concentration in drinking water for January
December 1980 is shown in Table 1.7.
20
-------
TABLE 14
DRINKING WATER
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AK:FAIRBANKS
AL:DOTHAN
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MUSCLE SHOALS
ALrSCOTTSBORO
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA: BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
CO:PLATTEVILLE
CT:HARTFORD
DC-.WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:MIAMI
FL:TAMPA
GArBAXLEY
GA:SAVANNAH
HI:HONOLULU
IA:CEDAR RAPIDS
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:MORRIS
KS:TOPEKA
MA:LAWRENCE
MA:ROWE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:CONOWINGO
ME:AUGUSTA
MI:DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:RED WING
MO:JEFFERSON CITY
MS:JACKSON
MS:PORT GIBSON
NC:CHARLOTTE
DATE
COLLECTED
7/16/80
7/15/80
11 8/80
7/10/80
7/ 7/80
7/ 7/80
7/ 7/80
11 7/80
7/24/80
7/23/80
11 7/80
11 1/80
11 3/80
11 1/80
11 7/80
7/15/80
7/22/80
7/25/80
11 2/80
11 7/80
7/10/80
11 1/80
9/30/80
7/14/80
7/30/80
11 1/80
7/15/80
11 9/80
7/17/80
7/17/80
11 7/80
7/15/80
8/ 7/80
11 2/80
7/ 2/80
7/14/80
nCi/1
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
2.8
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
± e
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
21
-------
TABLE 14 (CONTINUED)
DRINKING WATER
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980
LOCATION
NC:WILMINGTON
ND:BISMARCK
NE:LINCOLN
NH:CONCORD
NJ:TRENTON
NJrWARETOWN
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:ALBANY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:SYRACUSE
OH .-CINCINNATI
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:EAST LIVERPOOL
OH:PAINESVILLE
OH:TOLEDO
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
PC:ANCON
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:HARTSVILLE
SC:JENKINSVILLE
SC:SENECA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TX:AUSTIN
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WA:RICHLAND
WA: SEATTLE'
WI: GENOA
WI:MADISON
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
DATE
COLLECTED
11 1/80
11 2/80
11 1/80
7/10/80
11 3/80
11 9/80
11 7/80
11 8/80
11 1/80
11 1/80
9/22/80
11 3/80
11 7/80
7/14/80
11 8/80
11 8/80
11 2/80
11 9/80
11 7/80
7/14/80
11 2/80
11 3/80
11 3/80
11 3/80
7/15/80
7/14/80
7/11/80
If 2/80
7/23/80
11 3/80
11 .7/80
7/ 1/80
11 3/80
7/ 1/80
7/15/80
11 9/80
nCi/1
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.3
1.0
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.6
+ e
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
-------
TABLE 15
DRINKING WATER
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
OCTOBER - DECEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AK:FAIRBANKS
ALrDOTHAN
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MUSCLE SHOALS
ALrSCOTTSBORO
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA:BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
COrPLATTEVILLE
CT:HARTFORD
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:MIAMI
FL:TAMPA
GA: SAVANNAH
HIrHONOLULU
lAiCEDAR RAPIDS
IA:CEDAR RAPIDS
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:MORRIS
KS:TOPEKA
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA:LAWRENCE
MA:ROWE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:CONOWINGO
ME:AUGUSTA
MI:DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINNEAPOLIS
MN:RED WING
MO:JEFFERSON CITY
MS:JACKSON
MS:PORT GIBSON
MT:HELENA
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:WILMINGTON
ND:BISMARCK
NE:LINCOLN
NE:LINCOLN
NH:CONCORD
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:WARETOWN
DATE
COLLECTED
10/16/80
10/16/80
11/18/80
10/ 8/80
10/10/80
10/20/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 3/80
ll/ 5/80
10/30/80
10/ 6/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 6/80
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/ 3/80
12/29/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 6/80
10/ 3/80
12/29/81
10/22/80
10/ 6/80
10/31/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 7/80
10/14/80
10/20/80
10/23/80
10/ 2/80
10/20/80
10/29/80
10/ 2/80
10/10/80
10/22/80
10/ 6/80
10/13/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 6/80
12/31/80
10/ 7/80
10/ 2/80
10/ 7/80
nCi/1
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
3.4
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.2
± e
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
23
-------
TABLE 15 (CONTINUED)
DRINKING WATER
TRITIUM CONCENTRATION
OCTOBER - DECEMBER 1980
LOCATION
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:ALBANY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:SYRACUSE
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:EAST LIVERPOOL
OH:PAINESVILLE
OH:TOLEDO
OK .-OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:COLUMBIA
PA:HARRISBURG
PA PITTSBURGH
PC:ANCON
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:HARTSVILLE
SC:JENKINSVILLE
SC:SENECA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TX:AUSTIN
TX:AUSTIN
VA:DOSWELL
VA:DOSWELL
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WA:RICHLAND
WA:SEATTLE
WI:GENOA
WI:MADISON
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
DATE
COLLECTED
10/ 6/80
10/14/80
10/ 6/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 1/80
ll/ 3/80
10/ 9/80
10/14/80
10/ 2/80
10/ 8/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 8/80
10/ 9/80
10/ 9/80
10/14/80
11/18/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 9/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 6/80
10/10/80
10/21/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
12/29/80
10/29/80
12/30/80
10/10/80
10/ 6/80
10/ 8/80
10/ 6/80
11/21/80
12/ 4/80
nCl/1
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.2
± e
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
24
-------
LOCATION
AK:ANCHORAGE
AK:FAIRBANKS
ALrDOTHAN
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MUSCLE SHOALS
AL:SCOTTSBORO
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA: BERKELEY
CA:LOS ANGELES
CO: DENVER
CO:PLATTEVILLE
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
TABLE 16
DRINKING WATER
ALPHA, BETA AND GAMMA CONCENTRATION
1979
ANNUAL ANALYSES
TOTAL
;OLIDS
mg/1
69.4
159.6
152.4
56.6
87.6
104.4
38.2
43.8
341.2
53.0
790.0
31.0
138.2
100.0
GROSS BETA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
0.1 0.3
4/23/80
4.3 0.9
4/23/80
1.8 1.0
4/23/80
1.0 0.8
4/23/80
1.1 0.7
4/23/80
2.3 0.9
4/23/80
1.0 0.7
5/13/80
0.9 0.7
5/13/80
4.6 1.3
5/13/80
0.5 0.6
5/13/80
10.3 1.8
5/13/80
1.2 0.8 .
5/13/80
1.6 1.0
5/15/80
1.4 0.8
GROSS ALPHA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
0.2 0.5
4/23/80
4.1 1.6
4/23/80
0.1 0.8
4/23/80
<2.0 2.0
4/23/80
0.5 0.6
4/23/80
<2.0 2.0
4/23/80
0.3 0.4
5/13/80
0.1 0.4
5/13/80
0.5 0.5
5/13/80
0.5 0.5
5/13/80
2.0 1.8
5/13/80
0.2 0.4
5/13/80
1.8 2.1
5/15/80
0.1 0.6
90Sr
pCi/1 + e
1.0
0.2
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.4
226Ra
pCi/1 + e
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SPECIFIC
GAMMA
ACTIVITY
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5/15/80 5/15/80
25
-------
TABLE 16 (CONTINUED)
1979
ANNUAL ANALYSES
LOCATION
FLrMIAMI
FL.-TAMPA
GArBAXLEY
GA: SAVANNAH
HI: HONOLULU
IA: CEDAR RAPIDS
ID: BOISE
ID: IDAHO FALLS
IL: CHICAGO
IL: MORRIS
KS:TOPEKA
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA: LAWRENCE
MA:ROWE
TOTAL
SOLIDS
mg/1
230.0
226.6
135.6
73.4
190.0
141.2
61.2
217.6
176.8
277.4
391.6
156.8
74.6
45.0
GROSS BETA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
1.8 1.0
5/15/80
2.7 1.1
5/15/80
0.7 0.5
5/15/80
1.7 0.9
5/21/80
1.6 0.9
5/22/80
1.1 0.9
5/22/80
1.9 0.9
5/22/80
3.4 1.1
5/22/80
25.2 2.3
5/22/80
18.2 1.8
7/ 8/80
8.5 1.5
11 8/80
2.2 1.0
7/ 8/80
0.7 0.7
11 8/80
0.1 0.4
11 8/80
GROSS ALPHA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
0.1 0.8
5/15/80
0.4 0.9
5/15/80
1.8 1.2
5/15/80
0.1 0.4
5/21/80
<2.0 2.0
5/21/80
<2.0 2.0
5/21/80
0.2 0.2
5/21/80
0.6 0.9
5/21/80
<2.0 2.0
5/21/80
12.8 4.7
11 8/80
1.2 1.5
11 8/80
0.7 1.0
11 8/80
0.3 0.5
11 8/80
0.2 0.'5
11 8/80
9°Sr
pCi/1 + e
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.4
1.6
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.4
226D
Ra
pCi/1 + e
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SPECIFIC
GAMMA
ACTIVITY
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MD:BALTIMORE
89.2 0.1 0.4 <2.0 2.0
II 8/80 II 8/80
0.3 0.4
NA
ND
26
-------
TABLE 16 (CONTINUED)
1979
ANNUAL ANALYSES
LOCATION
MD:CONOWINGO
ME:AUGUSTA
MI:DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:RED WING
MO:JEFFERSON CITY
MS:JACKSON
MS:PORT GIBSON
MT:HELENA
NC: CHARLOTTE
NC: WILMINGTON
ND:BISMARCK
NE:LINCOLN
TOTAL
SOLIDS
mg/1
207.8
62.4
111.0
46.8
455.8
253.4
302.0
40.6
405.6
96.8
54.4
90.2
363.0
176.2
GROSS BETA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
2.2 1.0
7/10/80
1.8 0.9
7/10/80
1.4 0.9
7/25/80
1.0 0.7
7/18/80
9.3 1.
7/10/80
4.7 1.3
7/10/80
2.0 0.8
7/10/80
0.6 0.9
11 7/80
3.3 1.2
7/10/80
2.4 1.1
7/21/80
0.9 0.7
7/21/80
2.4 0.9
7/21/80
3.7 1.1
7/21/80
8.8 1.4
7/21/80
GROSS ALPHA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
0.1 0.8
7/11/80
<2.0 2.0
7/11/80
<2.0 2.0
7/25/80
0.1 2.0
7/18/80
1.4 1.4
7/11/80
2.6 1.5
7/11/80
2.9 1.7
7/11/80
<2.0 2.0
11 8/80
0.1 1.2
7/11/80
0.4 0.6
7/21/80
0.0 0.3
7/21/80
0.0 0.4
7/21/80
<2.0 2.0
7/21/80
1.3 1.2
7/21/80
90Sr
pCi/1 + e
0.3
0.7
0.0
1.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.6
0.8
1.8
1.1
0.6
3.6
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.5
0.6
226Ra
pCi/1 + e
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SPECIFIC
GAMMA
ACTIVITY
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
27
-------
TABLE 16 (CONTINUED)
1979
ANNUAL ANALYSES
LOCATION
NH: CONCORD
NJ: TRENTON
NJrWARETOWN
NM: SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY: ALBANY
NY: NEW YORK CITY
NY .-NIAGARA FALLS
NY: SYRACUSE
OH CINCINNATI
OH: COLUMBUS
OH: EAST LIVERPOOL
OH:PAINESVILLE
OH: TOLEDO
TOTAL
SOLIDS
mg/1
44.0
111.8
5309.4
131.8
657.2
68.2
49.2
80.4
80.4
92.8
203.0
111.6
192.8
51.9
GROSS BETA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
0.5 0.5
7/18/80
0.5 0.6
7/18/80
40.5 5.3
7/21/80
2.1 0.4
7/ 7/80
6.5 1.5
7/21/80
0.7 0.7
7/21/80
0.8 0.7
7/18/80
1.1 1.1
7/18/80
2.0 0.9
7/14/80
3.0 1.0
7/21/80
2.8 1.0
7/18/80
1.9 0.9
7/21/80
3.0 1.1
7/25/80
1.0 1.0
7/18/80
GROSS ALPHA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
0.0 0.4
7/18/80
0.3 0.6
7/18/80
1.3 26.0
7/21/80
12.0 2.4
7/ 8/80
1.1 1.1
7/21/80
0.2 0.5
7/21/80
<2.0 2.0
7/18/80
<2.0 2.0
7/18/80
0.2 0.5
7/14/80
<2.0 2.0
7/21/80
<2.0 2.0
7/18/80
<2.0 2.0
7/21/80
<2.0 2.0
7/25/80
<2.0 2.0
7/18/80
90Sr
pCi/1 + e
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.9
0.4
0.4
1.1
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.4
1.0
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.5
226Ra
pCi/1 + e
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SPECIFIC
GAMMA
ACTIVITY
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
28
-------
TABLE 16 (CONTINUED)
1979
ANNUAL ANALYSES
LOCATION
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:COLUMBIA
PA:HARRISBURG
PA:PITTSBURGH
PC:ANCON
PR:SAN JUAN
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:HARTSVILLE
SC:JENKINSVILLE
SC:SENECA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TOTAL
SOLIDS
mg/1
234.0
21.2
177.6
35.2
104.4
80.2
104.4
54.2
22.0
43.2
23.4
102.0
29.2
89.0
GROSS BETA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
5.5 1.3
7/18/80
0.7 0.7
7/ 7/80
1.6 1.1
7/25/80
0.6 0.8
7/21/80
1.0 0.9
7/25/80
0.9 0.8
5/15/80
IS
7/25/80
0.5 0.6
7/25/80
0.6 0.7
7/ 7/80
2.1 0.9
7/21/80
1.0 0.7
7/25/80
1.7 0.9
7/21/80
0.7 0.9
7/21/80
1.9 0.9
GROSS ALPHA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
<2.0 2.0
7/18/80
0.1 0.2
7/ 7/80
<2.0 2.0
7/25/80
<2.0 2.0
7/21/80
<2.0 2.0
7/25/80
0.2 0.4
5/15/80
IS
7/25/80
<2.0 2.0
7/25/80
0.1 0.2
11 8/80
<2.0 2.0
7/21/80
<2.0 2.0
7/25/80
0.4 0.5
7/21/80
0.1 0.3
7/21/80
<2.0 2.0
90Sr
pCi/1 + e
0.9
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.7
0.3
0.2
1.4
0.2
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.2
226D
Ra
pCi/1 + e
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SPECIFIC
GAMMA
ACTIVITY
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
~ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7/14/80 7/14/80
29
-------
TABLE 16 (CONTINUED)
1979
ANNUAL ANALYSES
LOCATION
TNrKNOXVILLE
TX: AUSTIN
VA:DOSWELL
VArLYNCHBURG
VA: NORFOLK
WA:RICHLAND
WA: SEATTLE
WI: GENOA
WI: MADISON
TOTAL
SOLIDS
mg/1
89.0
129.8
86.2
34.8
50.0
53.8
11.2
130.0
28.6
GROSS BETA
DATE CTD.
pCi/1 + e
IS
7/14/80
1.7 1.0
11 7/80
3.7 1.0
7/14/80
0.0 0.0
11 7/80
2.6 0.9
7/14/80
0.4 1.4
7/14/80
1.5 1.0
11 7/80
1.6 1.0
11 7/80
0.6 0.1
11 8/80
GROSS ALPHA
DATE CTD. Sr
pCi/1 + e pCi/1 + e
IS 0.1 0.1
7/14/80
0.1 0.6 0.1 0.3
11 8/80
<2.0 2.0 -0.2 0.3
7/14/80
0.3 3.3 0.1 0.1
11 8/80
<2.0 2.0 0.4 0.2
7/14/80
0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1
7/14/80
0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1
11 8/80
0.7 0.8 0.0 0.1
11 9/80
0.1 0.4 -0.1 1.1
11 9/80
226.,
Ra
pCi/1 + e
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SPECIFIC
GAMMA
ACTIVITY
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND NO ACTIVITY DETECTABLE
NA NO ANALYSIS
IS INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
30
-------
TABLE 17
IODINE-131 IN DRINKING WATER
JANUARY - DECEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AK:ANCHORAGE
AK:FAIRBANKS
ALrDOTHAN
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MUSCLE SHOALS
AL:SCOTTSBORO
AR:LITTLE ROCK
CA:BERKELEY
CArLOS ANGELES
CO:DENVER
CO:PLATTEVILLE
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:MIAMI
FL:TAMPA
GA:BAXLEY
GA:SAVANNAH
HI:HONOLULU
IA:CEDAR RAPIDS
ID:BOISE
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IL:MORRIS
KS:TOPEKA
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA:LAWRENCE
MA:ROWE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:CONOWINGO
ME:AUGUSTA
MI:DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINNEAPOLIS
MN:RED WING
MO:JEFFERSON CITY
MS:JACKSON
MS:PORT GIBSON
MT:HELENA
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:WILMINGTON
ND:BISMARCK
NE:LINCOLN
NH:CONCORD
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:WARETOWN
DATE
COLLECTED
4/14/80
4/18/80
4/ 9/80
4/23/80
4/ 2/80
4/ 1/80
4/ 2/80
11 7/80
4/ 4/80
4/21/80
7/23/80
4/ 9/80
7/ 1/80
4/ 3/80
4/ 7/80
4/ 7/80
NS
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/ 3/80
10/ 3/80
4/10/80
NS
4/ 1/80
4/ 1/80
4/ 7/80
4/ 8/80
7/30/80
10/ 3/80
7/15/80
11 9/80
7/17/80
10/23/80
4/ 7/80
4/28/80
4/30/80
4/ 2/80
11 2/80
10/22/80
4/10/80
4/ 1/80
11 2/80
10/ 6/80
7/10/80
10/ 2/80
4/18/80
nCi/1
-0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.8
0.0
-0.2
0.1
0.1
-0.2
-0.3
0.0
-0.2
-0.3
0.0
0.3
-0.1
0.0
-0.2
0.6
-0.2
-0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
-0.4
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.3
0.2
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.5
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.1
+ e
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
31
-------
TABLE 17 (CONTINUED)
IODINE-131 IN DRINKING WATER
JANUARY - DECEMBER 1980
LOCATION
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:ALBANY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NIAGARA FALLS
NY:SYRACUSE
OHCINCINNATI
OH .-COLUMBUS
OH:EAST LIVERPOOL
OH:PAINESVILLE
OH:PAINESVILLE
OH:TOLEDO
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR .-PORTLAND
PA:COLUMBIA
PA:HARRISBURG
PA:PITTSBURGH
PC:ANCON
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:HARTSVILLE
SC:JENKINSVILLE
SC:SENECA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TX:AUSTIN
VA:DOSWELL
VA:LYNCHBURG
VA:VIRGINIA BEACH
WA.-RICHLAND
WA:SEATTLE
WI:GENOA
WI:MADISON
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
DATE
COLLECTED
10/ 6/80
11 7/80
11 8/80
4/17/80
4/ 8/80
ll/ 3/80
4/ 2/80
4/15/80
1/22/80
4/ 3/80
4/ 3/80
1/13/81
4/ 3/80
10/ 8/80
7/15/80
11 7/80
1/22/80
5/ 5/80
4/ 8/80
10/ 9/80
4/ 2/80
4/14/80
4/11/80
11 2/80
4/28/80
4/ 3/80
10/29/80
11 7/80
11 1/80
10/ 8/80
10/ 6/80
4/24/80
4/16/80
nCi/1
0.1
-0.4
0.2
-0.1
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
0.1
-0.1
0.1
-0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.2
0.2
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.1
± e
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
32
-------
All samples were taken as either a single grab sample or
composite samples taken over 12 to 14 days.
Radon-222 in Drinking Water
Radon-222 in drinking water has previously been considered a
source of radiation exposure primarily from an ingestion standpoint.
The Office of Radiation Programs (ORP) of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is investigating radon in water supplies to
evaluate the possibility that a major pathway from inhalation
exposure may exist in addition to the ingestion pathway. As an inert
gas, radon is not chemically bound to the water and consequently can
be released during any operation that aerates or agitates water.
Depending upon the initial concentration of radon in water,
significant quantities of radon could be released in a home or to the
general environment.
To determine the scope of this potential problem, a national ground
water sampling program has been initiated by the Eastern
Environmental Radiation Facility (EERF) to obtain data on radon
concentrations in water supplies throughout the country. Sampling
kits have been assembled by EERF and distributed to various state
health departments. The kit is designed so that state personnel can
collect samples from potable water supplies and ship them, without
loss of radon other than radioactive decay, to EERF for analysis.
The choice of sampling locations and the number of supplies to be
sampled is left to the discretion of the state programs. Each state
is asked to obtain a representative sampling of ground water supplies
within its boundaries. The extent of the sampling efforts and how
representative the data are for a given state is determined primarily
by the amount of time each state devotes to the program. The
concentrations of radon in water are determined at the EERF by liquid
scintillation counting. The limit of detection for this technique
using a 50-minute count and a 10-ml sample is 0.16 pCi or 16 pci/1.
The sampling kits are being provided to the various states on a
rotating schedule. This schedule is designed to cover the U.S.
within approximately two years. As data from each state are compiled
they will be published in ERD.
33
-------
SECTION III. External Gamma Ambient Monitoring Program
The external gamma monitoring program, which began in October
1978, provides a continuous measurement of ambient gamma exposure
rates, including cosmic, at selected sites throughout the continental
United States. Data from this program will be used to evaluate
fluctuations in natural background due to variations in environmental
conditions and to provide a means of monitoring any significant
increases in ambient gamma levels due to weapons fallout, reactor
operations, etc. Initially, the program will consist of
approximately 22 sites representing a wide geographic coverage
throughout the country. Hopefully, at some later date additional
sites will be added to the program. Although exposure measurements
at these few sites are not totally representative of nationwide
exposures, they will be indicative of national trends.
The monitoring program utilizes CaFo:Mn thermoluminescent
dosimeters (TLD's). These dosimeters are commercially available
glass-bulb type dosimeters with energy compensating shields. A group
of four TLD's is located at each station or site. Dosimeters are
annealed by the station operator prior to positioning in the field.
The dosimeters are returned. to EERF for readout on an approximate
one-month cycle. Several dosimeters are annealed by the station
operator as controls and returned with the exposed field dosimeters
to correct for any exposures accumulated during shipment.
Results from the period July 1980 through December 1980 are
shown in Tables 18-19.
Note: Results from the period December 1978 through June 1980
are being republished due to the omission of one page of data in ERD
21 - 22.
34
-------
TABLE 20 (FROM ERD 21 - 22)
1 jJVIRONMENTAL GAMMA AMBIENT MONITORING PROGRAM
INTEGRATED EXPOSURE
LOCATION DATE RANGE EXPOSURE RATE
MR +/- 2S MICRO R/HR +/- 2S
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:BERKELEY
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO .-DENVER
CO:DENVER
FL:ORLANDO
FL:ORLANDO
FL:ORLANDO
FL:ORLANDO
ID:BOISE
ID:BOISE
ID:BOISE
ID .-BOISE
ID:BOISE
ID:BOISE
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
ND:BISMARCK
ND:BISMARCK
ND:BISMARCK
ND:BISMARCK
ND:BISMARCK
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
123179-
20180-
40180-
50280-
60280-
123179-
20180-
33180-
50680-
60280-
120579-
10380-
20480-
40180-
51280-
61080-
20180-
40180-
50580-
53080-
120379-
10280-
21180-
33180-
51280-
60280-
120579-
10480-
20580-
40480-
60580-
120479-
10480-
20580-
40180-
51680-
61080-
123179-
20180-
33180-
51680-
60280-
120379-
11180-
20780-
41180-
52980-
20180
31080
50280
60280
70280
20180
33180
50680
60280
70180
10380
20480
40180
51280
61080
70180
40180
50580
53080
63080
10280
21180
33180
51280
60280
70380
10480
20580
40480
60580
70380
10480
20580
40180
51680
61080
70180
20180
33180
51680
60280
70280
11180
20780
41180
52980
60180
6
7
6
6
6
4
8
3
4
3
10
11
20
14
9
7
7
4
3
4
10
13
19
13
7
9
5
5
10
10
4
6
6
12
10
5
4
7
14
11
4
7
13
8
20
15
11
.22
.46
.12
.09
.05
.78
.14
.20
.05
.90
.09
.37
.35
.35
.55
.49
.87
.64
.31
.29
.46
.29
.65
.94
.60
.97
.54
.57
.33
.90
.70
.58
.78
.27
.23
.65
.51
.63
.46
.61
.67
.94
.74
.95
.66
.55
.02
5
6
5
5
5
5
7
10
7
5
3
3
8
8
3
3
5
6
6
4
5
5
3
3
10
4
5
4
4
5
16
7
4
3
12
6
15
4
3
10
4
4
7
3
6
6
4
.02
.75
.66
.16
.05
.33
.19
.33
.89
.69
.53
.80
.96
.90
.37
.54
.36
.61
.35
.68
.83
.05
.34
.60
.23
.67
.86
.85
.83
.41
.07
.96
.53
.94
.52
.41
.08
.42
.98
.08
.74
.07
.03
.43
.02
.03
.62
8
8
8
8
8
6
5
3
6
5
14
14
14
14
13
14
5
5
5
5
14
13
17
13
15
13
7
7
7
7
6
8
8
9
9
9
8
9
10
10
11
11
14
13
13
13
13
*
10
40
23
19
40
22
85
60
25
60
49
81
88
58
72
87
47
69
51
77
53
85
05
51
07
40
69
25
30
.32
99
84
83
13
47
41
95
.94
39
.29
44
.03
68
81
45
50
.92
5
6
5
5
5
5
7
10
7
5
3
3
8
8
3
3
5
6
6
4
5
5
3
3
10
4
5
4
4
5
16
7
4
3
12
6
15
4
3
10
4
4
7
3
6
6
4
.02
75
.66
16
.05
*
,
*
*
»
*
33
19
33
89
69
53
80
96
90
37
54
36
61
35
68
83
05
34
60
23
67
86
85
83
41
07
96
53
94
52
41
08
42
98
08
74
07
.03
43
.02
.03
62
35
-------
TABLE 20 (FROM ERD 21 - 22)
ENVIRONMENTAL GAMMA AMBIENT MONITORING PROGRAM
INTEGRATED EXPOSURE
LOCATION DATE RANGE EXPOSURE RATE
MR +/- 2S MICRO R/HR +/- 2S
NVrLAS VEGAS
NVrLAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NVrLAS VEGAS
NVrLAS VEGAS
NYrNEW YORK
NYrNEW YORK
NYrNEW YORK
NY rNEW YORK
NYrNEW YORK
NYrNEW YORK
OHrCOLUMBUS
OH r COLUMBUS
OH: COLUMBUS
OH r COLUMBUS
OHrCOLUMBUS
OH r COLUMBUS
OKrOKLAHOMA CITY
OKrOKLAHOMA CITY
OKrOKLAHOMA CITY
OKrOKLAHOMA CITY
OKrOKLAHOMA CITY
ORrPORTLAND
ORrPORTLAND
ORrPORTLAND
ORrPORTLAND
RlrPROVIDENCE
RI:PROVIDENCE
RlrPROVIDENCE
RlrPROVIDENCE
SCrBARNWELL
SCrBARNWELL
SC:BARNWELL
SCrBARNWELL
SCrBARNWELL
SCrCOLUMBIA
SCrCOLUMBIA
SCrCOLUMBIA
SCrCOLUMBIA
SCrCOLUMBIA
SCrCOLUMBIA
TNrKNOXVILLE
TNrKNOXVILLE
TNrKNOXVILLE
TNrKNOXVILLE
TNrKNOXVILLE
TNrKNOXVILLE
123179- 13180
13180- 40180
40180- 50580
50580- 53080
53080- 63080
121079- 10380
10380- 20780
20780- 41580
41580- 51580
51580- 60280
60280- 70980
120379- 10380
10380- 13080
13080- 33180
33180- 50680
50680- 52980
52980- 70180
120479- 10280
10280- 21380
32880- 50680
50680- 53080
53080- 70780
10780- 30580
30580- 40480
40480- 51680
51680- 61180
20480- 40380
40380- 51380
51380- 60280
60280- 70380
120579- 10380
10380- 13180
13180- 41080
50880- 61080
60580- 70380
113079- 10480
10480- 20180
20180- 32580
32580- 50880
50880- 53080
53080- 70180
112779- 12980
12980- 22980
22980- 32880
32880- 50980
50980- 53080
53080- 62780
5.30
12.61
5.88
4.19
5.09
4.17
6.66
12.31
5.72
3.41
7.05
5.49
4.67
10.10
6.08
4.11
5.76
5.43
7.87
7.35
4.55
7.06
10.73
5.49
8.29
4.92
13.97
9.13
5.09
7.26
5.54
5.51
12.65
6.27
4.97
7.06
5.75
11.09
9.01
4.64
6.69
14.15
6.54
6.32
9.27
4.77
6.50
8.52
4.21
5.74
11.07
5.12
9.87
7.71
6.32
7.07
10.51
4.54
6.74
5.30
8.07
18.48
4.71
6.23
6.59
3.34
11.87
4.49
5.42
6.46
6.91
6.99
4.49
5.16
5.02
5.91
7.62
4.11
6.03
7.13
12.26
14.92
4.62
4.81
6.63
5.31
3.69
11.27
9.53
6.40
4.45
3.11
5.06
4.55
7.12
8.62
7.20
6.98
6.84
7.24
7.92
7.54
7.94
7.89
7.93
7.38
7.20
7.01
6.85
7.44
7.27
7.81
7.80
7.65
7.89
7.75
7.84
7.38
8.22
7.89
9.87
9.51
10.60
9.76
7.96
8.20
7.53
7.91
7.40
8.40
8.56
8.88
8.34
8.78
8.72
9.36
8.79
9.76
8.98
9.47
9.67
8.52
4.21
5.74
11.07
5.12
9.87
7.71
6.32
7.07
10.51
4.54
6.74
5.30
8.07
18.48
4.71
6.23
6.59
3.34
11.87
4.49
5.42
6.46
6.91
6.99
4.49
5.16
5.02
5.91
7.62
4.11
6.03
7.13
12.26
14.92
4.62
4.81
6.63
5.31
3.69
11.27
9.53
6.40
4.45
3.11
5.06
4.55
36
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL GAMMA AMBIENT MONITORING PROGRAM
INTEGRATED EXPOSURE
LOCATION DATE RANGE EXPOSURE RATE
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND
VT:BARRE
VT:BARRE
VT:BARRE
VT:MONTPELIER
VT:MONTPEHER
VT:MONTPELIER
MR +/- 2S MICRO R/HR +/- 2S
120379-
10280-
20180-
40280-
60280-
120379-
10280-
13180-
32580-
50680-
60280-
10280
20180
40280
60280
70180
10280
13180
32580
50680
60280
70880
5
5
10
10
5
6
5
11
7
5
7
.30
.43
.56
.93
.44
.02
.95
.46
.56
.55
.22
3
6
6
13
4
8
3
6
16
5
11
.99
.52
.29
.62
.83
.63
.87
.07
.84
.02
.96
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
9
7
8
8
.36
.54
.21
.47
.81
.36
.55
.01
.32
.56
.36
3
6
6
13
4
8
3
6
16
5
11
.99
.52
.29
.62
.83
.63
.87
.07
.84
.02
.96
ND NO DATA FOR THIS PERIOD
S 2 SIGMA ERROR (IN PERCENT)
37
-------
TABLE 18
ENVIRONMENTAL GAMMA AMBIENT MONITORING PROGRAM
LOCATION DATE RANGE MEAN FIELD EXPOSURE +/- 2SIG(%)
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA: BERKELEY
CA: BERKELEY
CA:BERKELEY
COrDENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
FL:ORLANDO
FL:ORLANDO
FL:ORLANDO
ID:BOISE
ID:BOISE
ID:BOISE
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
ND:BISMARCK
ND:BISMARCK
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NM: SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK
NY:NEW YORK
NY:NEW YORK
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:COLUMBUS
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
RI:PROVIDENCE
RI:PROVIDENCE
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:BARNWELL
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:COLUMBIA
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND
VT:MONTPELIER
VT:MONTPELIER
VT:MONTPELIER
MR +/- 2S
70280- 80480
80480- 90280
90280-100180
70180- 80180
80180- 82980
82980-100280
70180- 73180
73180- 90280
90280-100180
63080- 80180
80180- 82980
82980-100180
70380- 80180
80180- 90280
90280- 92980
70380- 80780
80780- 90580
90580-101480
70180- 80180
80180- 90580
90480- 93080
70279- 80179
70280- 73180
73180- 90280
90280-100180
70180- 80180
80180- 82680
82680-100380
63080- 73180
73180- 90280
90280- 93080
70980- 80880
80880- 90480
90480-100680
70180- 73180
73080- 82880
82880- 93080
70780- 80580
80580- 90380
90380-100380
61180- 71680
71680- 80480
80480- 90980
90980-100180
70380- 73080
73080- 90380
90380-100680
70380- 73180
73180- 82880
82880- 92680
70180- 72980
72980- 82680
82680- 92680
62780- 80480
80480- 82880
70180- 73180
73180- 82780
82780-100180
70880- 72880
72980- 82980
82980-100780
6.51
5.88
5.77
4.30
3.97
5.02
10.44
11.93
10.64
4.44
3.64
4.61
8.96
10.19
9.18
6.33
5.27
6.73
6.93
7.63
5.28
7.51
7.48
8.85
7.35
10.39
8.41
12.77
4.94
5.59
4.76
5.68
5.01
5.61
4.95
4.60
5.63
5.47
5.42
5.72
6.41
3.34
6.60
4.20
6.60
8.31
8.05
4.95
5.40
5.59
6.39
5.88
6.58
8.60
5.61
5.52
5.00
6.60
4.01
6.13
7.72
5.13
4.77
3.05
6.29
12.47
5.73
6.09
5.12
4.23
5.98
8.18
17.77
10.53
5.30
8.74
7.88
4.47
5.93
8.68
4.64
5.46
4.62
3.94
3.60
9.78
7.59
9.00
8.28
9.58
5.47
11.29
6.25
4.25
8.36
8.97
4.65
12.97
8.00
12.05
4.32
14.28
16.16
6.23
5.10
4.73
10.00
4.68
20.45
5.49
13.74
5.03
4.00
4.43
3.70
4.62
4.80
5.27
4.72
5.93
13.79
6.01
MICRO R/HR +/- 2S
8.22
8.45
8.30
5.77
5.91
6.15
14.51
15.07
15.29
5.78
5.41
5.83
12.87
13.26
14.17
7.53
7.57
7.19
13.12
9.08
8.46
10.43
10.74
11.17
10.56
13.97
14.02
14.01
6.64
7.06
7.08
7.89
7.74
7.31
6.88
6.62
7.10
7.87
7.78
7.94
7.63
7.33
7.64
7.95
10.19
9.90
10.16
7.37
8.04
8.03
9.51
8.75
8.85
9.43
9.74
7.66
7.72
7.86
8.35
8.24
8.25
5.13
4.77
3.05
6.29
12.47
5.73
6.09
5.12
4.23
5.98
8.18
17.77
10.53
5.30
8.74
7.88
4.47
5.93
8.68
4.64
5.46
4.62
3.94
3.60
9.78
7.59
9.00
8.28
9.58
5.47
11.29
6.25
4.25
8.36
8.97
4.65
12.97
8.00
12.05
4.32
14.28
16.16
6.23
5.10
4.73
10.00
4.68
20.45
5.49
13.74
5.03
4.00
4.43
3.70
4.62
4.80
5.27
4.72
5.93
13.79
6.01
ND NO DATA FOR THIS PERIOD
S 2 SIGMA ERROR (IN PERCENT)
38
-------
TABLE 19
ENVIRONMENTAL GAMMA AMBIENT MONITORING PROGRAM
INTEGRATED EXPOSURE
LOCATION DATE RANGE EXPOSURE RATE
MR +/- 2S MICRO R/HR +/- 2S
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
CA:BERKELEY
CA:BERKELEY
CA: BERKELEY
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
FL:ORLANDO
FL:ORLANDO
FL:ORLANDO
ID:BOISE
ID:BOISE
ID:BOISE
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
ND:BISMARCK
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NM:SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
NM:SANTA FE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:NEW YORK
NY:NEW YORK
NY:NEW YORK
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:COLUMBUS
OH:COLUMBUS
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
RI:PROVIDENCE
RI:PROVIDENCE
RI:PROVIDENCE
SC:BARNWELL
SC:BARNWELL
SC:BARNWELL
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:COLUMBIA
SC:COLUMBIA
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND
VA:RICHMOND .
VT:MONTPELIER
VT:MONTPELIER
VT:MONTPELIER
100180-111280
120180- 10581
100280-103180
103180-120280
120280-123080
100180-103080
103080-120480
120480-123180
100180-103180
103180-120280
120280- 10581
92980-103180
103180-120180
120180- 10781
101480-110580
112480-120580
120580- 10681
102880-120280
100180-110180
110180-120380
120380-123180
100380-103080
103080-112680
112680-121980
121980- 11481
93080-103080
103080-120280
120280-123180
100680-111080
111080-120580
120580- 10881
93080-103080
103080-120480
120480- 10281
100380-102880
102880-120480
120480- 10781
100180-110380
110380-120380
120380- 10781
100680-110780
110780-120380
120380- 11281
92680-110680
110680-120480
120480- 11581
92680-103080
103080-120280
120280-123080
82880-102180
102180-122380
100180-103180
103180-120180
120180-123180
100780-110380
110380-120480
120480- 12081
8.27
6.77
4.10
4.25
3.68
9.97
12.29
9.58
4.03
4.42
4.57
10.08
10.12
12.05
3.90
2.00
5.40
8.59
8.11
7.74
6.67
9.36
9.05
7.33
8.38
5.08
5.72
4.51
6.85
5.24
5.83
5.19
6.16
5.07
4.98
5.65
6.58
5.79
5.65
6.36
7.92
6.24
10.56
7.91
5.04
7.74
6.98
6.80
5.68
11.83
14.11
5.60
5.90
5.45
5.41
6.12
9.10
3.03
3.06
17.22
28.28
21.22
7.58
4.08
5.16
17.87
8.57
8.63
3.34
5.39
4.26
5.25
6.21
7.73
5.11
5.44
3.62
4.92
7.64
8.35
4.98
9.12
5.51
5.23
14.86
14.74
5.90
5.30
5.31
4.67
5.23
11.85
7.37
5.13
4.97
8.60
13.69
7.94
3.29
4.60
4.58
17.17
5.99
5.23
6.49
6.92
5.53
6.69
4.49
8.64
4.22
4.08
5.36
6.75
8.20
8.05
5.89
5.54
5.47
14.33
14.63
14.78
5.59
5.75
5.60
13.12
13.60
13.57
7.38
7.58
7.03
10.23
10.90
10.08
9.93
14.45
13.97
13.28
13.42
7.06
7.23
6.48
7.51
7.80
7.14
7.21
7.33
7.28
8.30
6.36
8.06
7.32
7.85
7.57
10.32
10.00
11.00
8.04
7.50
7.68
8.55
8.59
8.45
9.13
9.33
7.78
7.93
7.57
8.35
8.23
8.07
3.03
3.06
17.22
28.28
21.22
7.58
4.08
5.16
17.87
8.57
8.63
3.34
5.39
4.26
5.25
6.21
7.73
5.11
5.44
3.62
4.92
7.64
8.35
4.98
9.12
5.51
5.23
14.86
14.74
5.90
5.30
5.31
4.67
5.23
11.85
7.37
5.13
4.97
8.60
13.69
7.94
3.29
4.60
4.58
17.17
5.99
5.23
6.49
6.92
5.53
6.69
4.49
8.64
4.22
4.08
5.36
6.75
ND NO DATA FOR THIS PERIOD
S 2 SIGMA ERROR (IN PERCENT)
39
-------
SECTION IV. Milk Program
Pasteurized Milk
This is a cooperative program of the EPA, ORP and the Dairy and
Lipid Products Branch, Milk Sanitation Section, Food and Drug
Administration. Milk is a reliable indicator of the general
populations intake of radionuclides since it is consumed by a large
segment of the population and contains several of the biologically
important contaminants resulting from environmental releases from
nuclear activities. A primary function of this program is to obtain
reliable monitoring data relative to current radionuclide
concentrations and determine any long-term trends.
Monthly samples are collected at 65 sampling sites with one or
more located in each state, Puerto Rico, and the Panama Canal. These
are composite samples representing more than 80 percent of the milk
consumed in major population centers.
These samples are analyzed for iodine-131, barium-140,
cesium-137, and potassium. All 65 samples are analyzed annually in
July for strontium-89, and strontium-90. Also, for the first month
of the three quarters beginning January, April and October, 10
regional composite samples of milk made up from the states within
each of EPA's 10 regions are analyzed for strontiura-89 and
strontium-90.
Iodine-131, barium-140, cesium-137 and potassium are determined
by gamma spectral analysis. Strontium-89 and strontium-90 are
determined by beta counting a total strontium precipitate which has
been chemically separated by ion-exchange.
The values from the pasteurized milk samples for July - December
1980 are shown in Tables 20 - 25. Strontium values from regional
composite samples collected October 1980 are shown in Table 26.
Tritium in Milk
It was previously proposed to analyze all 65 milk samples for
tritium in the aqueous and organic phases, on an annual basis (on the
April sample). The EERF is currently evaluating alternative
analytical techniques anticipating that these analyses will begin
during the coming year.
40
-------
TABLE 20
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
JULY 1980
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AZ:PHOENIX
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
COrDENVER
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:TAMPA
GA:ATLANTA
HI:HONOLULU
IA:DES MOINES
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
KS:WICHITA
KY:LOUISVILLE
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA:BOSTON
MD:BALTIMORE
ME:PORTLAND
MI:DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:ST. LOUIS
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
NC:CHARLOTTE
ND:MINOT
NE:OMAHA
NH:MANCHESTER
NJ:TRENTON
NY:BUFFALO
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:SYRACUSE
DATE
COLLECTED
11 9/80
11 6/80
7/10/80
11 7/80
11 1/80
7/10/80
7/31/80
11 7/80
11 7/80
7/ 7/80
7/ 1/80
7/29/80
7/ 1/80
7/ 7/80
11 2/80
7/ 7/80
11 7/80
7/ 9/80
7/ 8/80
11 2/80
7/ 8/80
11 7/80
7/ 8/80
7/10/80
7/ 7/80
7/ 8/80
7/11/80
11 2/80
7/ 7/80
7/ 2/80
11 7/80
7/22/80
7/11/80
7/ 7/80
7/11/80
7/ 7/80
11 7/80
7/ 7/80
K
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8/1
.42
.51
.39
.44
.42
.27
.20
.51
.45
.48
.38
.46
.49
.41
.33
.49
.44
.38
.34
.42
.44
.50
.41
.46
.40
.42
.39
.40
.36
.38
.56
.47
.06
.40
.39
.41
.42
.40
±
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
e
12
12
08
12
12
12
12
12
08
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
08
12
07
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
08
12
22
08
11
08
12
12
08
12
Cs
pCi/l+e
1
3
2
0
-1
4
2
7
2
0
13
5
12
4
2
-1
-1
3
1
4
11
5
8
2
5
7
-1
4
2
4
5
-2
2
10
2
0
2
7
*
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
4.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
15.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
i*t>
Ba
pCi/l+e
-3.
-8.
1.
-5.
-8.
4.
1.
-6.
-5.
0.
-2.
0.
-9.
-2.
-1.
-9.
2.
-5.
-1.
-2.
-4.
-5.
-5.
-1.
-2.
0.
3.
-7.
-8.
-4.
-24.
-5.
-2.
0.
-4.
-3.
-4.
-7.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
5.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
19.
6.
8.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
J. J J
LI
pCi/l+e
2.
1.
-2.
-2.
1.
-1.
-3,
3.
2.
0.
-6.
1.
3.
0.
0.
2.
-3.
3.
-1.
2.
0.
-1.
-2.
0.
2.
-4.
1.
1.
0.
-3.
7.
2.
0.
3.
-1.
5.
3.
-3.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
4.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
13.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
41
-------
TABLE 20 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUGLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
JULY 1980
LOCATION
OH:CINCINNATI
OH:CLEVELAND
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA PHILADELPHIA
PA PITTSBURGH
PC:CRISTOBAL
PR:SAN JUAN
SC:CHARLESTON
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:KNOXVILLE
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:NORFOLK
VT:BURLINGTON
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WI:MILWAUKEE
WV:CHARLESTON
WY:LARAMIE
DATE
COLLECTED
11
11
11
11
11
11
7/80
7/80
7/80
7/80
7/80
9/80
7/17/80
11
9/80
7/29/80
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
7/80
9/80
7/80
3/80
8/80
7/80
8/80
3/80
1/80
7/15/80
K ij'
8/1 ±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.38
.43
.34
.39
.50
.34
.45
.42
.49
.43
.38
.43
.44
.34
.39
.39
.43
.44
.51
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
.08
.12
.22
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
Cs
pCi/l+e
3.
-1.
-5.
-1.
4.
1.
11.
2.
2.
4.
7.
-1.
0.
9.
0.
2.
-4.
3.
0.
5.
7.
15.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
J.HV.
'Ba
pCi/l+e
-7.
-4.
-16.
1.
-8.
-6.
-5.
-5.
3.
-6.
-3.
0.
-3.
-6.
-3.
-2.
-5.
0.
-8.
6.
8.
19.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
j. ji
I
pCi/l+e
0.
3.
-3.
1.
-1.
1.
-2.
-1.
1.
3.
-2.
-1.
0.
-1.
5.
-2.
-1.
-3.
-1.
5.
7.
13.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
42
-------
TABLE 21
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
AUGUST 1980
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AZ:PHOENIX
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:SACRAMENTO
CArSAN FRANCISCO
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:TAMPA
HI:HONOLULU
IA:DES MOINES
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IN: INDIANAPOLIS
KS:WICHITA
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA:BOSTON
MD:BALTIMORE
ME:PORTLAND
MI:DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:ST. LOUIS
MS:JACKSON
NC:CHARLOTTE
NE:OMAHA
NH:MANCHESTER
NJ:TRENTON
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NY:BUFFALO
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:SYRACUSE
DATE
COLLECTED
8/11/80
8/
8/
4/80
7/80
8/14/80
8/
8/
5/80
7/80
8/29/80
8/
8/
4/80
5/80
8/11/80
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
4/80
5/80
4/80
4/80
4/80
4/80
6/80
7/80
5/80
1/80
5/80
7/80
4/80
5/80
8/80
6/80
4/80
4/80
8/80
4/80
1/80
5/80
8/11/80
8/
8/
4/80
4/80
K
g/1 ± e
1.46
1.44
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
40
53
43
43
39
48
36
38
45
44
42
46
48
45
36
44
37
1.44
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
50
43
37
35
34
39
39
61
39
31
47
37
52
37
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.08
.12
.22
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.16
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
137Po
Cs
pCi/l+e
10.
-1.
3.
0.
3.
0.
2.
0.
-2.
2.
15.
7.
4.
-1.
3.
2.
1.
2.
3.
2.
10.
6.
5.
-4.
-1.
1.
5.
14.
2.
7.
2.
3.
-1.
-2.
0.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
15.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
11.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
140Ba
pCi/l+e
-4.
-5.
-3.
-4.
-4.
-5.
-6.
-5.
-2.
-2.
-3.
-6.
-7.
-11.
0.
-4.
-2.
3.
1.
5.
-2.
-8.
-2.
3.
1.
-2.
2.
-1.
-7.
0.
-4.
-2.
-3.
2.
-2.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
6.
8.
19.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
14.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
131-,.
pCi/l+e
-1.
-1.
-4.
2.
3.
2.
3.
-3.
2.
2.
-2.
-1.
1.
-6.
-2.
1.
6.
-4.
2.
0.
-4.
3.
-3.
1.
-3.
2.
-1.
15.
2.
0.
-3.
-4.
1.
0.
-2.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
13.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
9.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
43
-------
TABLE 21 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
AUGUST 1980
LOCATION
OH:CINCINNATI
OH: CLEVELAND
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA PHILADELPHIA
PA:PITTSBURGH
PC:CRISTOBAL
PR:SAN JUAN
SC:CHARLESTON
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:KNOXVILLE
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:NORFOLK
VT:BURLINGTON
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WI: MILWAUKEE
WV:CHARLESTON
WY:LARAMIE
DATE
COLLECTED
8/11/80
8/ 7/80
8/ 4/80
8/ 4/80
8/ 4/80
8/ 6/80
8/21/80
8/15/80
8/28/80
8/ 4/80
8/ 6/80
8/ 4/80
8/ 1/80
8/ 4/80
8/ 4/80
8/ 5/80
8/ 1/80
8/ 4/80
8/26/80
K
8/1 ±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.41
.33
.44
.44
.29
.39
.39
.29
.47
.36
.49
.39
.52
.40
.46
.48
.44
.38
.35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
.12
.12
.08
.07
.12
.12
.12
.12
.22
.12
.08
.08
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
'Cs
pCi/l+e
5.
1.
1.
5.
-1.
0.
4.
6.
1.
7.
0.
5.
5.
8.
1.
4.
-2.
6.
5.
7.
7.
5.
4.
7.
7.
7.
7.
15.
7.
5.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
J.HV
'Ba
pCi/l+e
-4.
0.
-6.
0.
-4.
-3.
-4.
-1.
-10.
2.
-2.
-4.
-3.
6 .
-4.
-5.
-2.
0.
-9.
8.
8.
6.
5.
8.
8.
8.
8.
19.
8.
6.
6.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
uj
I
pCi/l+e
3.
4.
-2.
3.
0.
8.
-2.
-3.
0.
-3.
0.
0.
3.
0.
-4.
-8.
-5.
8.
2.
7.
7.
5.
4.
7.
7.
7.
7.
13.
7.
5.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
44
-------
TABLE 22
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
SEPTEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AZ:PHOENIX
CAtLOS ANGELES
CA:SACRAMENTO
CArSAN FRANCISCO
COrDENVER
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:TAMPA
HI:HONOLULU
IA:DES MOINES
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
KS:WICHITA
KY:LOUISVILLE
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA:BOSTON
MD:BALTIMORE
ME:PORTLAND
MI:DETROIT
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:ST. LOUIS
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
NC:CHARLOTTE
ND:MINOT
ND:MINOT
NE :'OMAHA
NH:MANCHESTER
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:BUFFALO
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:SYRACUSE
DATE
COLLECTED
9/ 3/80
9/ 8/80
9/11/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 4/80
9/ 8/80
9/30/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 7/80
9/23/80
9/ 2/80
9/ 2/80
9/ 2/80
9/10/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 4/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 4/80
9/ 9/80
9/ 5/80
9/ 9/80
9/11/80
9/ 6/80
9/12/80
9/ 3/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 2/80
9/29/80
9/ 2/80
9/12/80
9/ 2/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 9/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 8/80
9/ 8/80
K
g/l±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.39
.45
.44
.53
.40
.40
.40
.44
.47
.30
.37
.38
.43
.43
.37
.48
.44
.42
.33
.44
.51
.44
.46
.50
.38
.58
.39
.49
.39
.46
.43
.27
.31
.40
.38
.47
.50
.41
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
.12
.08
.12
.12
.22
.08
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.22
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.07
.12
.12
Cs
pCi/l+e
6.
5.
2.
5.
0.
-2.
-2.
7.
10.
0.
16.
11.
5.
4.
7.
5.
4.
-1.
4.
5.
6.
5.
9.
7.
2.
6.
3.
8.
0.
3.
3.
5.
3.
7.
2.
1.
2.
-1.
7.
5.
7.
7.
15.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
15.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
4.
7.
7.
j.t<.
'Ba
pCi/l+e
-1.
0.
0.
0.
-3.
2.
-2.
-4.
-5.
-4.
-2.
-2.
-8.
-1.
1.
-2.
6.
0.
-1.
-4.
2.
0.
-5.
-3.
6.
-2.
1.
-5.
-14.
-3.
-1.
-5.
-15.
2.
1.
-2.
3.
0.
8.
6.
8.
8.
19.
6.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
19.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
5.
8.
8.
j..
J J
I
pCi/l+e
4
2
4
8
4
-1
2
-1
1
2
4
19
5
-1
-3
0
0
1
-1
2
0
8
6
8
0
3
1
2
-1
2
1
4
-4
7
8
2
6
5
.
7.
5.
7.
7.
13.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
12.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
13.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
4.
7.
7.
45
-------
TABLE 22 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
SEPTEMBER 1980
LOCATION
OH:CINCINNATI
OH:CLEVELAND
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA PHILADELPHIA
PA .-PITTSBURGH
PC:ANCON
SC:CHARLESTON
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:KNOXVILLE
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:NORFOLK
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WI:MILWAUKEE
WV:CHARLESTON
WY:LARAMIE
DATE
COLLECTED
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/80
8/80
8/80
8/80
8/80
8/80
9/25/80
9/
9/
9/80
8/80
9/17/80
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/
8/80
5/80
8/80
2/80
2/80
2/80
9/11/80
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
K
8/1
.33
.36
.30
.39
.39
.40
.32
.38
.49
.44
.39
.51
.39
.38
.36
.37
.42
±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.22
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.08
137Cs
pCi/l+e
3.
5.
2.
3.
4.
7.
12.
14.
2.
1.
8.
3.
0.
-3.
3.
6.
2.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
15.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
140Ba
pCi/l+e
1.
-4.
1.
-3.
4.
3.
0.
-8.
4.
-4.
2.
1.
0.
-2.
-5.
-5.
-1.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
19.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
6.
13J.J
pCl/l+e
0.
3.
1.
0.
3.
-2.
-5.
2.
2.
-2.
8.
1.
2.
3.
-2.
2.
4.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
13.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
46
-------
TABLE 23
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
OCTOBER 1980
LOCATION
AK:ANCHORAGE
AK:ANCHORAGE
AK:PALMER
AK:PALMER
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CA.-SAN FRANCISCO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
CT:HARTFORD
CT:HARTFORD
CT:HARTFORD
CT:HARTFORD
DC WASHINGTON
DC WASHINGTON
DATE
COLLECTED
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 8/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/30/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 9/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/30/80
10/ 9/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 2/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 9/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/29/80
10/31/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/30/80
10/ 7/80
10/22/80
10/24/80
10/29/80
10/31/80
10/ 3/80
10/24/80
K
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8/1
.39
.51
.47
.54
.41
.41
.28
.38
.46
.38
.47
.44
.36
.45
.44
.41
.36
.32
.58
.41
.60
.57
.31
.39
.41
.41
.40
.53
.56
.43
.41
.53
.56
.61
.57
.38
.40
.44
.48
.39
.43
.26
.39
.46
.37
±
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
e
12
08
12
22
12
12
08
08
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
08
12
08
14
12
12
12
12
08
14
12
12
12
12
08
14
12
12
12
12
12
12
08
12
12
12
12
14
Cs
pCi/l+e
3
9
1
11
6
1
5
9
3
4
11
5
9
7
2
3
4
7
3
0
1
1
0
3
-2
3
12
4
7
-1
1
4
5
4
0
5
5
7
8
2
12
14
11
-1
4
^
*
*
7.
5.
7.
15.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
5.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
L^t V
'Ba
pCi/l+e
8.
6.
-1.
-2.
-5.
-3.
0.
7.
.1
-5.
0.
9.
-6.
2.
1.
-5.
4.
6.
-1.
0.
3.
2.
1.
0.
-2.
1.
6.
-1.
-9.
1.
-1.
-2.
5.
0.
-4.
7.
4.
4.
-3.
-2.
1.
13.
10.
-2.
4.
8.
6.
8.
20.
8.
8.
6.
6.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
9.
8.
9.
8.
6.
9.
6.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
9.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
J. J J
LI
pCi/l+e
-5.
-3.
-3.
11.
-1.
-1.
2.
2.
2.
9.
8.
3.
6.
5.
-1.
2.
2.
0.
10.
1.
0.
1.
4.
4.
6.
-2.
6.
8.
1.
-1.
5.
4.
-3.
5.
-1.
-5.
0.
-2.
1.
5.
-1.
5.
2.
5.
5.
7.
5.
7.
13.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
47
-------
TABLE 23 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
LOCATION
DC:WASHINGTON
DC:WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:TAMPA
FL:TAMPA
FL:TAMPA
FL:TAMPA
FL:TAMPA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
HI:HONOLULU
HI:HONOLULU
HI:HONOLULU
HI:HONOLULU
HI:HONOLULU
IA:DES MOINES
IA:DES MOINES
IA:DES MOINES
IA:DES MOINES
IA:DES MOINES
ID:IDAHO FALLS
ID:IDAHO FALLS
ID:IDAHO FALLS
ID:IDAHO FALLS
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
KS:WICHITA
KS:WICHITA
KS:WICHITA
KS:WICHITA
KS:WICHITA
KY:LOUISVILLE
DATE
COLLECTED
10/29/80
10/31/80
10/ 3/80
10/23/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 1/80
10/15/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 7/80
10/24/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 7/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/31/80
10/13/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 7/80
K
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8/1
.38
.50
.46
.35
.57
.26
.45
.45
.60
.41
.42
.42
.32
.47
.36
.30
.29
.39
.37
.67
.44
.55
.45
.37
.39
.43
.53
.43
.38
.66
.38
.47
.36
.37
.35
.55
.40
.31
.37
.45
.42
.45
.46
.57
.52
.58
.37
±
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
e
12
08
12
08
14
12
12
12
12
14
12
08
12
12
22
22
12
12
12
13
12
10
12
08
12
12
08
12
12
23
22
12
12
12
22
12
12
12
08
12
12
12
12
08
12
12
12
Cs
pCi/l+e
0.
9.
-1.
2.
3,
16.
16.
19.
16.
19.
17.
2.
1.
3.
5.
11.
0.
5.
15.
12.
15.
14.
0.
4.
-3.
-3.
-2.
0.
7.
2.
4.
7.
5.
8.
0.
11.
1.
3.
3.
0.
12.
0.
9.
2.
14.
-1.
9.
7.
5.
7.
5.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
5.
7.
7.
15.
15.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
15.
15.
7.
7.
7.
15.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
1*+'
"Ba
pCi/l+e
-4.
4.
-2.
-6.
2.
9.
-3.
-6.
2.
2.
1.
-1.
-2.
-3.
-3.
-13.
0.
-5.
7.
4.
0.
6.
-2.
0.
5.
-2.
-2.
1.
1.
-1.
-10.
3.
-1.
4.
-6.
6.
0.
8.
0.
2.
2.
-5.
0.
0.
9.
-5.
1.
8.
6.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
20.
19.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
6.
8.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
20.
19.
8.
8.
8.
19.
9.
8.
8.
6.
9.
8.
8.
9.
6.
8.
9.
8.
J.
_>.
LI
pCi/l+e
4
1
-1
2
4
-6
6
1
6
6
7
2
2
2
10
11
6
1
-4
5
5
2
1
2
2
3
4
4
-2
-1
5
-3
0
-7
3
5
8
5
2
3
-1
0
2
2
-5
2
7
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
13.
13.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
13.
13.
7.
7.
7.
13.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
48
-------
TABLE 23 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
LOCATION
. KY:LOUISVILLE
KY:LOUISVILLE
KY:LOUISVILLE
KY:LOUISVILLE
LA .-NEW ORLEANS
LA:NEW ORLEANS
LA:NEW ORLEANS
LA:NEW ORLEANS
LA,: NEW. ORLEANS .
MA:BOSTON
MA:BOSTON
MA:BOSTON
MA:BOSTON
MA:BOSTON
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:BALTIMORE
ME:PORTLAND
ME:PORTLAND
ME:PORTLAND
ME:PORTLAND
ME PORTLAND
MI .-DETROIT
MI-.DETROIT
MI:DETROIT
MI .-DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST.
MN:MINN/ST.
MN:MINN/ST.
MN:MINN/ST.
MN:MINN/ST.
MN:MINN/ST.
MO:KANSAS
MO .-KANSAS
MO:KANSAS
MO:KANSAS
MO:KANSAS
MO:ST.
MO:ST.
PAUL
PAUL
PAUL
PAUL
PAUL
PAUL
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
LOUIS
LOUIS
DATE
COLLECTED
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 2/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 7/80
10/21/80
10/23/80
10/27/80
10/30/80
10/ 3/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/31/80
10/ 8/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 8/80
10/21/80
10/23/80
10/28/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 4/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/28/80
10/30/80
10/31/80
10/ 9/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 8/80
10/21/80
K
1
g/1
.36
1.50
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.28
.68
.36
.47
.27
.33
.43
.49
.62
.43
.58
.34
.40
.47
.39
.55
.69
.37
.45
.46
.56
.51
.43
.60
.33
.50
.31
.54
.33
.40
.42
.60
.56
.35
.42
.49
.40
.53
.34
.44
.68
.56
.38
.41
.49
± e
0
.12
0.12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.12
.15
.12
.12
.14
.12
.12
.12
.14
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.15
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.14
.12
.12
.08
.14
.12
.14
.12
.14
.12
.12
.12
.12
.13
.08
.12
.08
.12
Cs
pCi/l+e
13.
4.
12.
4.
8.
12.
14.
2.
11.
5.
6.
6.
0.
4.
5.
1.
13.
4.
3.
5.
9.
0.
5.
6.
-1.
0.
-1.
1.
3.
6.
5.
4.
0.
8.
10.
15.
4.
8.
0.
5.
2.
0.
2.
2.
1.
-1.
-1.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
5.
8.
7.
8.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
it^
Ba
pCi/l+e
9.
-2.
7.
5.
0.
-1.
0.
3.
0.
0.
3.
-4.
0.
-1.
-3.
0.
3.
0.
2.
-1.
7.
2.
-5.
-4.
-3.
-5.
-2.
-2.
-1.
2.
5.
-7.
2.
1.
4.
2.
-6.
6.
0.
-1.
-1.
-5.
-1.
-2.
-3.
2.
-4.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
6.
8.
9.
9.
8.
9.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8. ~
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
9.
6.
8.
6.
9.
J.
J J,
I
pCi/l+e
-4
2
1
1
0
5
6
1
-4
6
0
2
8
5
4
3
7
3
7
-5
-12
1
6
1
5
4
8
1
1
-1
0
3
4
2
-5
1
2
0
0
2
2
2
0
3
2
1
0
*
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
49
-------
TABLE 23 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
LOCATION
MO:ST. LOUIS
MO:ST. LOUIS
MO:ST. LOUIS
MS:JACKSON
MS:JACKSON
MS:JACKSON
MS:JACKSON
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
MT:HELENA
MT:HELENA
MT:HELENA
MT:HELENA
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:CHARLOTTE
ND:MINOT
ND:MENOT
ND:MINOT
ND:MINOT
NE:OMAHA
NE:OMAHA
NE:OMAHA
NE:OMAHA
NE:OMAHA
NH:MANCHESTER
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NMrALBUQUERQUE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:BUFFALO
NY:BUFFALO
NY:BUFFALO
NY:BUFFALO
NY:BUFFALO
NY:NEW YORK CITY
DATE
COLLECTED
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/13/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 7/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/10/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/23/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/30/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/30/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
K
8/1 ±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.51
.42
.54
.41
.51
.28
.43
.32
.47
.40
.57
.42
.27
.40
.41
.50
.38
.60
.56
.88
.58
.53
.99
.37
.70
.28
.44
.35
.48
.63
.43
.61
.40
.36
.36
.26
.40
.49
.52
.36
.31
.41
.51
.56
.42
.39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
.22
.12
.14
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.08
.12
.12
.14
.22
.22
.12
.12
.12
.14
.14
.11
.12
.12
.11
.12
.15
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.08
.14
.14
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.10
.12
.08
.07
'Cs
pCi/l+e
8
-2
2
2
2
6
7
10
7
8
2
12
-3
7
5
3
1
4
8
16
1
6
0
-2
6
6
4
4
2
3
4
7
5
3
8
12
0
13
5
1
1
9
5
1
8
3
15.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
8.
15.
15.
7.
7.
7.
8.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
8.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
7.
5.
4.
if
Ba
pCi/l+e
-6.
-2.
0.
-1.
-2.
-5.
5.
5.
0.
1.
1.
4.
-2.
-2.
-1.
4.
-2.
7.
0.
5.
0.
-1.
-6.
2.
1.
-5.
-5.
-3.
0.
1.
-5.
-4.
-2.
0.
8.
7.
0.
-5.
-8.
-8.
0.
6.
5.
-3.
7.
-2.
19.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
6.
8.
9.
8.
19.
20.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
8.
9.
6.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
6.
9.
6.
5.
1OJ
LI
pCi/l+e
-1.
1.
4.
-3.
1.
4.
-1.
-6.
6.
-3.
2.
9.
5.
2.
1.
2.
5.
4.
3.
8.
3.
1.
4.
2.
2.
0.
1.
3.
3.
-1.
4.
8.
0.
4.
0.
7.
0.
4.
6.
4.
1.
0.
2.
0.
-9.
2.
13.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
13.
13.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
4.
50
-------
TABLE 23 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
LOCATION
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:SYRACUSE
NY:SYRACUSE
NY:SYRACUSE
NY:SYRACUSE
NY:SYRACUSE
OH CINCINNATI
OHCINCINNATI
OH CINCINNATI
OH CINCINNATI
OH CLEVELAND
OH CLEVELAND
OH CLEVELAND
OH:CLEVELAND
OH CLEVELAND
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
PA:PHILADELPHIA
PA PHILADELPHIA
PA:PHILADELPHIA
PA:PITTSBURGH
PA PITTSBURGH
PC:ANCON
PC:CRISTOBAL
PC:CRISTOBAL
PC:CRISTOBAL
PR:SAN JUAN
PR:SAN JUAN
SC:CHARLESTON
SC:CHARLESTON
SC:CHARLESTON
SC:CHARLESTON
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
DATE
COLLECTED
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 7/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/27/80
10/ 8/80
10/23/80
10/30/80
10/16/80
10/16/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/15/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/ 9/80
10/20/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/24/80
K
8/1 ±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.47
.56
.63
.62
.32
.37
.59
.53
.55
.54
.30
,34
.44
.40
.43
.37
.58
.49
.40
.39
.45
.42
.58
.37
.60
.34
.55
.29
.44
.42
.42
.37
.34
.33
.34
.43
.63
.51
.23
.20
.30
.24
.44
.41
.47
.55
.49
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
e
08
14
14
12
12
14
14
08
12
10
12
12
08
12
12
12
08
12
12
12
12
14
08
08
14
12
10
12
14
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
15
12
21
21
22
21
12
22
14
12
14
'Cs
pCi/l+e
5.
6.
4.
-2.
3.
8.
8.
0.
1.
3.
16.
10.
5.
2.
8.
3.
3.
-2.
4.
3.
6.
6.
"4.
-1.
10.
7.
6.
3.
-1.
3.
0.
5.
2.
9.
12.
14.
9.
4.
8.
9.
-3.
7.
1.
-1.
4.
7.
5.
5.
8.
8.
7.
7.
8.
8.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
5.
8.
7.
6.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
8.
7.
15.
15.
15.
15.
7.
15.
8.
7.
8.
i1
^X.
'Ba
pCi/l+e
-2
4
1
1
3
4
0
-5
1
3
8
4
5
0
5
-4
-2
-3
-3
8
3
2
1
-2
5
7
6
-4
10
-3
-3
-9
0
5
-1
6
9
1
-1
-16
-7
-1
-7
-11
1
1
1
*
6.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
6.
9.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
20.
19.
19.
20.
8.
19.
8.
9.
8.
j-jj
I
pCi/l+e
4.
1.
4.
3.
5.
6.
2.
2.
6.
2.
0.
0.
-4.
4.
-7.
0.
3.
2.
5.
-7.
0.
3.
0.
1.
-2.
-3.
0.
3.
1.
5.
3.
1.
0.
-6.
3.
2.
-2.
1.
11.
-4.
-3.
9.
4.
-1.
3.
-1.
6.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
13.
13.
13.
13.
7.
13.
7.
7.
7.
51
-------
TABLE 23 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
LOCATION
SD:RAPID CITY
SDrRAPID CITY
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:MEMPHIS
TN:MEMPHIS
TN:MEMPHIS
TN:MEMPHIS
TX:AUSTIN
TX:AUSTIN
TX:FT. WORTH
TX:FT. WORTH
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VT:BURLINGTON
VT:BURLINGTON
VT:BURLINGTON
VT:BURLINGTON
VT:BURLINGTON
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WA:SPOKANE
WA:SPOKANE
WA:SPOKANE
WI: MILWAUKEE
WI:MILWAUKEE
WI: MILWAUKEE
WI:MILWAUKEE
WI:MILWAUKEE
DATE
COLLECTED
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/23/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/21/80
10/27/80
10/29/80
10/31/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/21/80
10/23/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/27/80
10/31/80
10/ 3/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/ 7/80
10/21/80
10/28/80
10/30/80
10/ 6/80
10/21/80
10/24/80
10/28/80
10/31/80
K
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8/1
.47
.42
.50
.31
.20
.38
.31
.41
.36
.34
.61
.37
.53
.38
.51
.41
.36
.38
.62
.41
.40
.35
.54
.60
.58
.64
.64
.56
.70
.55
.44
.43
.44
.38
.40
.34
.42
.58
.39
.57
.38
.45
.47
.57
.38
.38
.38
+
e
0.12
0.
12
0.12
0.22
0.21
0.12
0.12
0.08
0.14
0.12
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
14
12
14
14
12
12
08
08
14
12
08
12
14
08
12
14
12
12
11
08
12
12
14
08
12
12
12
14
08
13
10
12
12
12
12
12
12
'Cs
pCi/l+e
4
2
9
-1
20
17
1
0
9
10
7
14
14
13
-2
5
2
14
7
4
4
3
4
2
4
12
9
1
7
9
9
5
6
7
8
-2
6
5
2
1
8
2
1
4
8
2
6
»
*
*
«
»
7.
7.
7.
15.
15.
7.
7.
5.
8.
7.
8.
7.
8.
8.
7.
7.
5.
5.
8.
7.
5.
7.
8.
5.
7.
8.
7.
7.
6.
5.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
6.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
JLH<
JBa
pCi/l+e
6.
-9.
-1.
-4.
3.
-3.
-6.
0.
2.
3.
3.
2.
4.
2.
-5.
0.
2.
0.
-1.
-6.
0.
1.
1.
2.
0.
0.
6.
0.
3.
-2.
5.
-9.
4.
6.
-2.
3.
7.
4.
-2.
-6.
4.
-2.
-5.
-4.
6.
0.
6.
8.
8.
8.
19.
20.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
9.
6.
6.
8.
9.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
9.
6.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
j.->j
LI
pCi/l+e
-2.
4.
2.
1.
3.
-2.
5.
3.
1.
-4.
2.
-3.
6.
9.
2.
2.
0.
0.
4.
4.
3.
0.
3.
4.
3.
0.
-4.
0.
-2.
2.
-6.
4.
-1.
-8.
1.
1.
-6.
5.
1.
2.
6.
3.
5.
-3.
-3.
6.
-3.
7.
7.
7.
13.
13.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
52
-------
TABLE 23 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
DATE K 137Cs l40Ba 131I
LOCATION COLLECTED g/1 + e pCi/l+e pCi/l+e pCi/l+e
WV:CHARLESTON 10/21/80 1.40 0.08 -2. 5. -2. 6. 2. 5.
WV:CHARLESTON 10/24/80 1.40 0.12 5. 7. 1. 8. 2. 7.
WV:CHARLESTON 10/28/80 1.38 0.10 6. 6. 2. 6. 1. 5.
WVrCHARLESTON 10/31/80 1.36 0.12 5. 7. 3. 8. -4. 7.
WY:LARAMIE 10/15/80 1.42 0.12 -2. 7. -4. 8. 2. 7.
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
53
-------
TABLE 24
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
NOVEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AK:ANCHORAGE
AK:PALMER
AK:PALMER
AK:PALMER
AK:PALMER
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AL:MONTGOMERY
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AR:LITTLE ROCK
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
AZ:PHOENIX
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:LOS ANGELES
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
CT:HARTFORD
CT:HARTFORD
CT:HARTFORD
DC WASHINGTON
DC WASHINGTON
DC WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
DATE
COLLECTED
ll/ 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/17/80
ll/ 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/12/80
11/17/80
ll/ 4/80
III 7/80
11/11/80
11/14/80
11/18/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/17/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/12/80
11/14/80
11/26/80
III 5/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 5/80
11/11/80
11/14/80
III 5/80
K
g/l±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.56
.40
.60
.35
.52
.56
.53
.58
.44
.56
.47
.42
.36
.38
.36
.53
.59
.59
.45
.46
.45
.37
.46
.59
.60
.46
.37
.41
.48
.46
.55
.50
.29
.74
.62
.44
.40
.57
.68
.54
.37
.33
.41
.59
.48
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
e
14
22
12
22
08
14
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
08
12
12
10
12
12
12
14
12
12
12
14
08
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
15
12
12
12
14
15
08
12
12
12
14
14
Cs
pCi/l+e
10.
6.
4.
4.
8.
9.
0.
5.
8.
9.
8.
-4.
6.
10.
1.
5.
5.
5.
10.
2.
9.
0.
7.
1.
4.
2.
1.
16.
3.
2.
12.
-1.
13.
0.
-1.
1.
-1.
2.
5.
9.
3.
8.
4.
9.
6.
8.
15.
7.
15.
5.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
7.
6.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
8.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
8.
8.
J.
*tv
'Ba
pCi/l+e
9
-5
2
5
8
4
1
-9
-3
-1
-7
-1
1
7
-1
0
2
-7
3
-9
8
0
2
-2
-3
-2
2
2
0
-3
3
-2
5
7
4
0
-1
5
6
0
-4
4
2
8
6
*
.
%
9.
19.
9.
20.
6.
8.
8.
9.
8.
9.
9.
8.
8.
6.
8.
9.
6.
9.
8.
8;
8.
8.
9.
9.
8.
6.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
A J J
LI
pCi/l+e
3.
-7.
-1.
3.
-5.
2.
4.
3.
1.
9.
3.
1.
8.
-7.
2.
7.
0.
6.
0.
4.
4.
1.
9.
1.
7.
2.
4.
3.
6.
2.
-2.
4.
-2.
3.
5.
-1.
2.
5.
2.
6.
6.
-1.
1.
9.
10.
7.
13.
7.
13.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
54
-------
TABLE 24 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
LOCATION
DE:WILMINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
FL:TAMPA
FL:TAMPA
FLrTAMPA
FL:TAMPA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
GA:ATLANTA
HI-.HONOLULU
HI:HONOLULU
HI:HONOLULU
HI:HONOLULU
IA:DES MOINES
IA:DES MOINES
IA:DES MOINES
IA:DES MOINES
ID-.IDAHO FALLS
ID:IDAHO FALLS
ID:IDAHO FALLS
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IL:CHICAGO
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
KS:WICHITA
KS:WICHITA
KS:WICHITA
KS:WICHITA
KY:LOUISVILLE
KY:LOUISVILLE
KY:LOUISVILLE
KY:LOUISVILLE
LA:NEW ORLEANS
LA:NEW ORLEANS
LA:NEW ORLEANS
LA:NEW ORLEANS
MA:BOSTON
MA:BOSTON
DATE
COLLECTED
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/17/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/24/80
ll/ 3/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/24/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 5/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 3/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/14/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 3/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 3/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/14/80
ll/ 3/80
ll/ 6/80
K
8/1 ±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.43
.46
.31
.45
.51
.39
.33
.43
.38
.31
.32
.72
.52
.50
.33
.47
.43
.42
.38
.51
.28
.55
.37
.46
.38
.49
.52
.61
.47
.59
.37
.29
.37
.42
.32
.41
.53
.49
.50
.47
.51
.46
.24
.35
.35
.44
.68
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
e
12
14
12.
12
14
22
12
22
12
12
12
15
12
14
12
12
12
12
12
12
08
08
12
08
12
12
14
14
12
12
08
12
12
12
12
14
12
10
14
12
12
12
12
14
12
12
15
Cs
pCi/l+e
-3
5
1
7
21
15
17
16
-1
7
13
12
8
8
8
5
3
7
-2
1
1
-2
6
12
0
-3
6
7
1
5
4
8
10
12
-1
5
4
6
7
7
7
7
5
7
14
10
0
*
*
*
»
*
»
7.
8.
7.
7.
8.
15.
7.
15.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
8.
8.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
6.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
8.
JLtl
'Ba
pCi/l+e
1.
1.
4.
-4.
9.
-18.
-6.
1.
-2.
2.
5.
-1.
-9.
3.
-1.
-5.
-2.
5.
1.
-3.
0.
-2.
-2.
4.
0.
-4.
2.
6.
-7.
0.
5.
6.
9.
4.
2.
2.
1.
5.
5.
5.
5.
-5.
-4.
4.
9.
7.
6.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
19.
8.
20.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
6.
8.
6.
9.
9.
8.
8.
8.
9.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
6.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
LJI
I
pCi/l+e
0.
3.
-1.
5.
4.
-1.
0.
-5.
8.
1.
-6.
4.
1.
3.
2.
6.
1.
-2.
5.
-3.
0.
4.
1.
2.
7.
2.
8.
-1.
1.
5.
5.
-2.
-2.
-2.
5.
8.
7.
4.
7.
0.
-3.
9.
3.
9.
2.
-3.
-21.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
13.
7.
13.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
12.
55
-------
TABLE 24 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
NOVEMBER 1980
LOCATION
MA .-BOSTON
MA:BOSTON
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:BALTIMORE
MD:BALTIMORE
ME:PORTLAND
ME PORTLAND
ME:PORTLAND
ME:PORTLAND
MI:DETROIT
MI:DETROIT
MI:DETROIT
MI .-DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:ST. LOUIS
MO:ST. LOUIS
MO:ST. LOUIS
MO:ST. LOUIS
MS .-JACKSON
MS:JACKSON
MS:JACKSON
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
MT:HELENA
MT:HELENA
MT:HELENA
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:CHARLOTTE
NC:CHARLOTTE
DATE
COLLECTED
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/14/80
11/21/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
ll/ 5/80
11/12/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
III 4/80
III 6/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/10/80
11/12/80
11/13/80
ll/ 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
K
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8/1
.43
.58
.42
.67
.40
.44
.43
.49
.48
.36
.56
.48
.56
.49
.39
.33
.48
.37
.36
.13
.44
.56
.50
.37
.35
.34
.42
.39
.54
.65
.49
.50
.47
.39
.70
.36
.42
.54
.57
.59
.62
.53
.43
.51
.38
± e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.12
.08
.08
.12
.12
.12
.22
.09
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.14
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.11
.12
.12
.10
.14
.08
.12
.12
.08
.12
.15
.08
.12
.12
.12
.15
.12
.12
.08
.08
.12
.12
.08
.12
.14
.12
Cs
pCi/l+e
16
6
0
3
6
3
9
6
3
7
4
-1
3
4
2
-4
3
7
1
14
8
5
9
13
12
3
10
0
4
7
9
1
9
4
5
3
0
6
6
0
4
7
11
8
7
*
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
15.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
8.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
8. '
7.
it*
'Ba
pCi/l+e
4.
-2.
0.
-4.
0.
-6.
0.
6.
-5.
-1.
-2.
1.
-4.
5.
-2.
2.
-1.
8.
3.
5.
-5.
1.
3.
2.
6.
-4.
7.
-4.
-7.
2.
9.
6.
5.
2.
6.
1.
-4.
4.
2.
-2.
-2.
3.
10.
-1.
-2.
8.
6.
6.
9.
8.
8.
20.
6.
9.
8.
6.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
6.
8.
6.
8.
8.
6.
9.
8.
6.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
6.
9.
9.
6.
8.
8.
8.
j.->j
LI
pCi/l+e
3.
-2.
0.
4.
0.
4.
-1.
2.
9.
0.
0.
-4.
8.
6.
6.
-2.
7.
-1.
-3.
2.
0.
2.
7.
8.
1.
1.
0.
7.
5.
4.
-1.
-4.
-5.
2.
9.
-2.
0.
7.
4.
8.
8.
0.
-4.
5.
5.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
7.
13.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
56
-------
TABLE 24 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
NOVEMBER 1980
LOCATION
NC:CHARLOTTE
ND:MINOT
ND:MINOT
ND:MINOT
ND:MINOT
NE:OMAHA
NE:OMAHA
NE:OMAHA
NE:OMAHA
NH:MANCHESTER
NH:MANCHESTER
NH:MANCHESTER
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NJ:TRENTON
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NM:ALBUQUERQUE
NM: ALBUQUERQUE
NM: ALBUQUERQUE
NM: ALBUQUERQUE
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NV:LAS VEGAS
NY:BUFFALO
NY:BUFFALO
NY:BUFFALO
NY:BUFFALO
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:SYRACUSE
NY:SYRACUSE
NY SYRACUSE
NY:SYRACUSE
NY:SYRACUSE
OH CINCINNATI
OH CINCINNATI
OHCINCINNATI
OH CINCINNATI
OH CLEVELAND
OH CLEVELAND
OH:CLEVELAND
DATE
COLLECTED
11/13/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/14/80
11/17/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
ll/ 6/80
11/13/80
11/20/80
III 3/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/17/80
III 7/80
11/13/80
11/18/80
III 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 3/80
ll/ 5/80
III 7/80
ll/ 8/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
ll/ 5/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
K
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8/1
.59
.41
.45
.71
.63
.42
.26
.44
.33
.66
.48
.51
.22
.37
.54
.39
.38
.46
.29
.28
.23
.50
.40
.23
.47
.60
.48
.38
.34
.45
.46
.40
.71
.39
.30
.42
.53
.71
.53
.41
.50
.39
.25
.44
.46
±
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
*
.
e
14
12
12
15
12
14
14
08
12
10
14
14
08
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
08
12
12
12
10
12
12
12
14
12
08
15
12
12
14
12
15
14
12
08
12
12
14
12
Cs
pCl/l+e
9.
2.
0.
9.
1.
12.
0.
5.
1.
5.
5.
6.
13.
1.
9.
1.
9.
2.
6.
4.
9.
1.
2.
11.
0.
8.
9.
2.
8.
4.
8.
1.
5.
9.
12.
5.
6.
2.
12.
1.
2.
2.
11.
3.
2.
8.
7.
7.
8.
7.
8.
7.
5.
7.
6.
8.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
6.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
5.
8.
7.
7.
8.
7.
8.
8.
7.
5.
7.
7.
8.
7.
itVJ
Ba
pCi/l+e
7.
-4.
-2.
2.
0.
4.
4.
-4.
0.
4.
3.
0.
6.
-4.
1.
2.
6.
-2.
3.
-2.
-4.
-3.
ft
9.
-4.
2.
4.
-1.
9.
1.
-1.
-4.
9.
7.
5.
4.
2.
3.
6.
-8.
2 .
1.
1.
4.
-4.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
6.
8.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
9.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
6.
9.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
i-jj
LI
pCi/l+e
5.
8.
2.
4.
5.
3.
1.
2.
-3.
0.
6.
4.
-1.
4.
3.
-1.
2.
1.
1.
0.
7.
6.
2.
3.
2.
3.
-6.
3.
1.
3.
1.
1.
3.
-2.
-5.
4.
6.
1.
4.
-1.
3.
1.
-2.
6.
-1.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
57
-------
TABLE 24 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
NOVEMBER 1980
LOCATION
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
OR:PORTLAND
PA PHILADELPHIA
PA PHILADELPHIA
PA PITTSBURGH
PA PITTSBURGH
PC:CRISTOBAL
PC:CRISTOBAL
PR:SAN JUAN
SC:CHARLESTON
SC:CHARLESTON
SC:CHARLESTON
SC:CHARLESTON
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
SD:RAPID CITY
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:KNOXVILLE
TN:MEMPHIS
TN:MEMPHIS
TN:MEMPHIS
TN:MEMPHIS
TX:AUSTIN
TX:AUSTIN
TX:AUSTIN
TX:AUSTIN
TX:FT. WORTH
DATE
COLLECTED
III 3/80
III 6/80
11/10/80
11/12/80
11/17/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
11/13/80
III 5/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
11/10/80
11/14/80
III 3/80
III 6/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/14/80
11/19/80
III 3/80
III 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/12/80
11/13/80
III 3/80
ll/ 6/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
III 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/16/80
11/14/80
K
g/1 ±
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.61
.48
.30
.36
.38
.50
.52
.20
.40
.46
.47
.58
.65
.34
.49
.51
.65
.43
.43
.44
.65
.36
.71
.37
.44
.53
.55
.49
.36
.57
.40
.58
.41
.36
.35
.29
.56
.36
.34
.50
.58
.42
.52
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
e
09
22
22
12
22
14
08
12
12
14
12
12
12
12
14
08
10
12
12
12
15
08
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
12
12
12
12
10
12
12
08
14
12
10
Cs
pCi/l+e
2.
10.
3.
-2.
5.
6.
1.
6.
0.
2.
-1.
-1.
10.
10.
19.
4.
5.
7.
3.
5.
8.
10.
0.
-1.
2.
3.
5.
5.
3.
7.
16.
9.
-2.
3.
6.
12.
11.
2.
0.
4.
3.
-1.
4.
5.
15.
15.
7.
15.
8.
5.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
7.
7.
5.
8.
7.
6.
it
"Ba
pCi/l+e
5.
11.
-13.
2.
-11.
9.
-2.
8.
-3.
2.
-2.
-7.
2.
0.
1.
-2.
-10.
-3.
-7.
2.
1.
0.
-2.
2.
-2.
1.
-2.
-5.
3.
6.
3.
3.
-1.
-5.
0.
6.
0.
-7.
-2.
-3.
2.
-3.
2.
6
20
19
8
19
8
6
8
8
8
8
9
9
8
8
6
8
8
8
9
8
6
9
8
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
6
8
8
6
i. JJ
'I
pCi/l+e
6.
8.
-3.
-2.
9.
2.
5.
1.
2.
7.
2.
1.
10.
1.
6.
2.
4.
3.
7.
5.
2.
-2.
0.
4.
9.
4.
5.
3.
2.
-2.
3.
4.
6.
5.
0.
1.
6.
7.
2.
8.
7.
2.
4.
5.
13.
13.
7.
13.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
5.
58
-------
TABLE 24 (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
NOVEMBER 1980
LOCATION
UTrSALT LAKE CITY
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VA:NORFOLK
VT:BURLINGTON
VT:BURLINGTON
VT:BURLINGTON
VT:BURLINGTON
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WA:SPOKANE
WA:SPOKANE
WA:SPOKANE
WI:MILWAUKEE
WI:MILWAUKEE
WI: MILWAUKEE
WI:MILWAUKEE
WV:CHARLESTON
WV:CHARLESTON
WV:CHARLESTON
WV:CHARLESTON
DATE
COLLECTED
ll/ 4/80
III 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/17/80
ll/ 5/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
11/17/80
ll/ 6/80
11/10/80
11/14/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 6/80
11/12/80
11/14/80
ll/ 4/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
ll/ 5/80
ll/ 7/80
11/10/80
11/13/80
K
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8/1
.52
.47
.36
.45
.65
.41
.68
.56
.47
.34
.25
.78
.26
.38
.39
.60
.53
.56
.51
.57
.50
.55
.47
.48
.41
.35
.28
.39
+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
.14
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.13
.09
.12
.12
.12
.15
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.14
.14
.12
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
Cs
pCi/l+e
10.
-1.
12.
-1.
4.
1.
5.
8.
1.
4.
15.
7.
17.
1.
8.
3.
-1.
7.
4.
3.
10.
7.
1.
1.
4.
-1.
11.
15.
8.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
8.
8.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
it \J
Ba
pCi/l+e
2.
-1.
7.
-1.
-4.
1.
1.
-2.
-7.
0.
3.
4.
1.
-3.
4.
1.
-5.
0.
-1.
4.
1.
2.
2.
-5.
1.
3.
10.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
9.
8.
9.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
9.
8.
8.
8.
8.
9.
9.
9.
8.
6.
8.
J.J J.
I
pCi/l+e
2.
3.
-2.
3.
4.
-3.
5.
6.
8.
4.
2.
-1.
3.
6.
5.
0.
2.
1.
2.
-4.
4.
2.
4.
8.
5.
2.
1.
1.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
59
-------
TABLE 25
I
CONCENTRATIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES IN PASTEURIZED MILK
DECEMBER 1980
LOCATION
AKrPALMER
AL:MONTGOMERY
CArLOS ANGELES
CA:SACRAMENTO
CA:SAN FRANCISCO
CO:DENVER
CT:HARTFORD
DC:WASHINGTON
DE:WILMINGTON
HI:HONOLULU
IA:DES MOINES
ID:IDAHO FALLS
IL:CHICAGO
IN:INDIANAPOLIS
KS:WICHITA
KY:LOUISVILLE
MA:BOSTON
MD:BALTIMORE
ME:PORTLAND
MI:DETROIT
MI:GRAND RAPIDS
MN:MINN/ST. PAUL
MO:KANSAS CITY
MO:ST. LOUIS
MS:JACKSON
MT:HELENA
NC:CHARLOTTE
ND:MINOT
NE:OMAHA
NH:MANCHESTER
NJ:TRENTON
NM: ALBUQUERQUE
NY:BUFFALO
NY:NEW YORK CITY
NY:SYRACUSE
OH CINCINNATI
OH CLEVELAND
OK:OKLAHOMA CITY
OR:PORTLAND
PA:PHILADELPHIA
PA:PITTSBURGH
PC .-CRISTOBAL
PR:SAN JUAN
TN:CHATTANOOGA
TN:KNOXVILLE
UT:SALT LAKE CITY
VA:NORFOLK
WA:SEATTLE
WA:SPOKANE
WI: MILWAUKEE
WV:CHARLESTON
WY:LARAMIE
DATE
COLLECTED
12/ 2/80
12/11/80
12/ 2/80
12/ 3/80
12/ 4/80
12/30/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 5/80
12/ 9/80
12/ 2/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 8/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 8/80
12/ 8/80
12/ 2/80
12/ 9/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 1/80
12/10/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 3/80
12/12/80
12/ 3/80
12/ 8/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 1/80
12/16/80
12/12/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 4/80
12/ 8/80
12/ 8/80
12/ 1/80
12/11/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 7/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 8/80
12/10/80
12/18/80
12/12/80
12/ 8/80
12/10/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 5/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 1/80
12/ 1/80
12/16/80
K
8/1 ± e
1.40 0.12
1.42 0.12
1.41 0.12
1.40 0.22
1.41 0.12
1.38 0.12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.37
.43
.31
.45
.49
.55
.29
.39
.42
.46
.51
.45
.23
.39
.35
.29
.40
.48
.40
.40
.45
.47
.44
.34
.40
.33
.54
.53
.50
.38
.35
.41
.37
.45
.45
.30
.43
.43
.44
.41
.51
.50
.35
.44
.32
.24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.22
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.21
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.22
.08
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.12
.22
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.08
.12
.12
.12
.12
137Cs.
pCi/l+e
5. 7.
-2. 7.
1. 7.
9. 15.
2. 7.
1. 7.
6.
-1.
3.
5.
5.
20.
4.
7.
7.
-1.
9.
4.
4.
2.
4.
4.
2.
3.
1.
3.
1.
-2.
1.
8.
6.
-3.
1.
-2.
7.
0.
4.
12.
2.
0.
0.
1.
2.
5.
5.
4.
6.
2.
8.
4.
5.
0.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
15.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
15.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
15.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
15.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
pCi/l+e
-5. 8.
-6. 8.
3. 8.
-21. 19.
-1. 8.
0. 8.
-8.
-3.
4.
-3.
-5.
7.
-9.
-7.
-2.
0.
3.
-5.
-23.
3.
-7.
0.
-2.
-3.
-4.
7.
-5.
-7.
0.
0.
2.
-1.
1.
-1.
-2.
-6.
-1.
-9.
-7.
-2.
-1.
3.
1.
-2.
0.
0.
1.
-7.
-4.
-2.
-5.
-5.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
20.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
19.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
19.
6.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
19.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
6.
8.
8.
8.
8.
13lT
pCi/l+e
1. 7.
3. 7.
2. 7.
11. 13.
1. 7.
2. 7.
0.
1
6
2
5
12
2
0
0
6
6
5
7
2
2
4
-2
6
3
2
6
1
8
3
5
8
-3
0
3
3
0
11
5
4
4
-3
0
5
5
1
10
3
5
1
1
3
»
*
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
13.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
13.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
13.
5.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
13.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
7.
7.
NS NO SAMPLE
e 2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
60
-------
TABLE 26
STRONTIUM-90 AND STRONTIUM-89 IN PASTEURIZED MILK
EPA REGIONAL COMPOSITES
OCTOBER 1980
EPA 90Sr 89Sr
REGION pCi/1 + e pCi/1 + e*
I 3.1 1.0 1. 5.
II 3.2 1.3 0. 5.
Ill 3.0 1.0 1. 5.
IV 3.1 1.1 1. 5.
V 3.2 1.0 1. 5.
VI 2.8 1.1 1. 5.
VII 2.7 1.1 0. 5.
VIII 2.3 0.9 1. 5.
IX 0.3 0.4 1. 5.
X 2.4 1.0 0. 5.
2 SIGMA COUNTING ERROR
ANALYTICAL ERROR TERM WHICH CLOSELY APPROXIMATES
THE COUNTING ERROR
61
-------
Plutonium and Uranium in Milk
Ten milk sampling sites near plutonium handling facilities, plus
2 sites chosen for background information, are analyzed annually for
plutonium and uranium. Analytical techniques approximate those used
for air filters.
Only plutonium analyses were performed on the 1974 samples, but
due to increased emphasis on levels of natural radioactivity, uranium
analyses were included for 1975 - 1976 samples. Data for samples
collected April 1978 were reported in ERD 14.
Iodine-129 in Milk
These analyses were designed to assess environmental levels of
iodine-129 around nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities. Annual
samples collected from Montgomery, Alabama (background); Idaho
Falls, Idaho; Chicago, Illinois; Buffalo, New York; and
Charleston, South Carolina; are analyzed for iodine-129 and stable
iodlne-127. Results for 1978 were reported in ERD 17.
Carbon-14 in Milk
Nine stations, chosen for wide geographical distribution,
contribute milk samples for annual analysis for carbon-14. These
samples have monitored the carbon-14 levels in the food chain
resulting from nuclear testing.
Analysis consists of combusting the samples and measuring
released carbon dioxide through liquid scintillation.
The results of carbon-14 analysis on samples collected during
May 1974 were reported in ERD Report 2, September 1975.
62
-------
SECTION V. tinman Bone Program
The Human Bone Program (formerly Human Bone Network) began
operation in 1961 to obtain data on the concentration of strontium-90
in man by age and geographical region. The target population for
this network is comprised of children and young adults up to 25 years
of age. The bone specimens were limited to accident victims or
persons who had died of an acute disease process that was not likely
to impair bone metabolism.
The following are operational characteristics of this program:
All samples are composited according to age and geographical
locations.
Strontium-90, plutonium-238 and -239, and calcium analyses are
performed annually on the composite samples.
No additional bone samples were procured past FY-75. Analysis
of samples on hand will be completed and results evaluated.
63
-------
SECTION VI. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO)
Air and Milk Program
An agreement was made in 1962 with the Pan American Health
Organization (PAHO) to develop a collaborative program for furnishing
assistance to health authorities in the Americas for developing
programs of radiological health. The agreement provided limited
quantities of essential equipment on a loan basis to PAHO which were
needed to establish surveillance programs, and also provided the
requisite laboratory services for analysis of air particulates, milk,
water, and other samples. Technical advice was given on research
designs for radiological health programs.
Analyses prior to January 1977 included the following:
Milk - 4 monthly samples analyzed for gamma-emitting
radionuclides, strontium-89, -90.
Air particulates - 12 stations with daily samples analyzed for
gross beta.
Beginning January 1, 1977, the PAHO Air Program was discontinued
and milk sampling was reduced to quarterly collection.
The PAHO programs are included organizationally as an ancillary
function of the ERAMS.
Results of the Pan American surface air particulate analyses for
October - December 1976 were reported in ERD 8.
Results of the Pan American milk quarterly analyses for October
- December 1978 were reported in ERD 16.
64
-------
DATA - STATE AGENCIES
Radiologic Health Section
California Department of Health
California Air Sampling Program
The Radiologic Health Section of the California Department of
Health with the assistance of several cooperating agencies maintains
a statewide air sampling network. One of the objectives of this
program is to measure and evaluate the contribution of fixed effluent
sources to particulate activity in the air. Data from air samplers
placed in proximity to nuclear facilities are compared with
information obtained from similar equipment in communities close to
the facilities and at several "background" or control stations.
Airborne particles are collected by a continuous sampling of air
filtered through a 47 millimeter membrane filter, 0.8 micrometer pore
size, using a Gast air pump that provides an average sampling rate of
40 liters per minute. Air volumes are measured with a direct reading
gas meter. Filters are replaced when approximately 300 cubic meters
of air are collected, i.e., on a weekly or semi-weekly schedule.
Charcoal cartridges mounted behind the filters at 10 of the 18
stations are replaced weekly.
All air samples are sent to the Department's Sanitation and
Radiation Laboratory, where the filters are analyzed for gross beta
radioactivity 72 hours after collection. Alpha activity is
determined weekly on ashed filters. Gamma spectroscopy and an
analysis for strontium-89 and strontium-90 are normally performed on
quarterly composites from each location. Immediate gamma scans are
run on any samples for which abnormal gross activity values are
observed. Charcoal cartridges are analyzed for radioiodines by gamma
spectroscopy as soon as received.
A monthly summary of gross alpha and beta radioactivity in
California air for July - December 1980 are shown in Tables 26 - 31.
Radionuclides in composites of California air for the second and
third quarters of 1980 are reported in Tables 32 and 33.
65
-------
Table 26
MONTHLY SUMMARY
OF GROSS ALPHA AND BETA RADIOACTIVITY IN CALIFORNIA AIR
(Alpha, fCi/m5; Beta, fCi/m?)
July - 1980
Month
Year
Station
ALPHA
BETA
Eureka
Humboldt Hill
Redding
Sacramento
Rancho Seco
Vallejo
Berkeley
Livermore
Salinas
San Luis Obispo
Diablo Canyon
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Onofre
San Diego
Bars tow
El Centro
Summary
No. of
Samples
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
-
4
4
4
4
4 '
63
Max.
.9
.6
1.0
<*.3
3.3
.9
1.0
12.7
?.4
1.7
'5.^
-
1.8
1.4
4.0
1.3
7.3
12.7
Min.
.0'
.0
.5
.1
1.4
.0
.3
1.?
.6
.3
.1
-~
.6
.6
.1
.6
1.1
.0
Averages
Mean
.4
.?
.8
1.5
2.5
.5
.6
5.6
1.3
1.1
2.1
-
1.1
1.0
1.5
9
3.0
1.5
f
5
.3
.7
.6
.8
.4
.5
1.5
.6
.7
1.4
-
.7
.7
.8
.6
.9
.7
No. of
Samples
9
9
9
9
9
6
6
9
7
9
4
-
9
4
9
6
9
123
Max.
19
18
78
24
66
15
17
69
20
?8
3?
-
49
?8
46
41
54
78
Min.
1
4
27
6
19
8
5
17
6
11
.20
-
10
15
16
18
19
1
Averages
Mean
8
9
46
16
^5
11
10
42
12
18
26
-
25
20
28
33
31
24
+
3
3
7
3
5
2
2
6
2
4
5
-
5
3
5
4
5
4
Source: California State Department of Health Services
66
-------
MONTHLY SUMMARY
OF GROSS ALPHA AND BETA RADIOACTIVITY IN CALIFORNIA AIR
(Alpha, fCi/m5; Beta, fCi/m-;)
August - 1980
Month Year
Station
ALPHA
BETA
Eureka
Humboldt Hill
Redding
Sacramento
Ranrho Seco
Vallejo
Berkeley
Livermore
Salinas
San Luis Obispo
Diablo Canyon
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Onofre
San Diepo
Bars tow
El Centro
Summary
No. of
Samples
5
5
5
5
5
.5
5
5
5
5
5
-
5
5
5
5
5 ' -
80
Max.
.7
1.0
3.3
2.5
17.8
1.2
.9
6.4
6.4
>8
9.^
5.2
1.9
1.5
3.7
?..o
17.8
Min.
.2
.1
1.3
.3
.1
.0
.2
-5
.2
.6
.4
.7
1.?
.5
.7
-3
.0
Averages
Mean
.5
.3
2.0
1.4
5.4
.5
5
2.9
2.0
1.4
3.5
-
2.3
1.4
.8
1.9
1.1
1.7
+
.5
.3
1.1
5
1.5
.5
.4
1.1
.7
.6
1.6
-
.9
.8
.5
.8
.6
.8
No. of
Samples
9
9
9
9
8
7
9
9
9
9
5
-
9
5
9
9
9
133
Max.
22
28
95
35
65
16
30
98
48
77
^7
-
50
29
97
52
42
98
Min.
6
8
^3
11
18
7
7
11
8
12
?5
-
21
22
24
3?
13
6
Averages
Mean
11
12
60
19
41
10
14
41
18
28
37
-
31
26
37
35
28
28
» .
3
3
8
3
4
3
3
6
3
4
5
-
5
4
5
5
4
4
Source: California State Department of Health Services
67
-------
Table 28
MONTHLY SUMMARY
OF GROSS ALPHA AND BETA RADIOACTIVITY IN CALIFORNIA AIR
(Alpha, fCi/m-5; Beta, fCi/nr )
September - 1980
Month Year
Station
ALPHA
BETA
Eureka
Humboldt Hill
Redding
Sacramento
Rancho Seco
Vallejo
Berkeley
Li vermore
Salinas
San Luis Obispo
Diablo Canyon
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Onofre
San Diego
Barstow
El Centre
Summary
No. of
Samples
4
2
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
-
4
3
'4
4
4
60
Max.
.3
1.0
1.1
3-5
9.7
5
.8
1.6
4.1
1.4
7-9
-
1.8
1.5
V?
1.9
10.3
10.3
Min.
.1
.3
.4
1.0
1.6
.2
.5.
1.3
.4
.3
.?.
-
.8
.9
..4
1.6
.9
.1
Averages
Mean
«
.3
.6
.6
2.6
5.9
.3
.7
1.4
2.8
.8
2.8
-
1.5
1.1
.8
1.8
3.8
1.7
+
.4
.4
.7
.7
1.?
.3
.4
.8
.8
.5
1-5
-
..8
.7
.6
.8
1.1
.7
No. of
Samples
9
5
9
9
9
8
9
9
9
9
4
-
9
3 '
9
9
9
128
Max.
22
24
70
43
83
?5
?5
80
76
48
60
-
64
^3
6?
77
78
83
Min.
5
7
36
?0
34
8
11
V
10
15
21
-
17
22
?5
30
21
5
Averages
Mean
14
14
5?
26
53'
17
16
. 43
39
?8
45
-
35
28
37
51
5?
34
+
3
2
8
3
5
3-
3
7
4
4
6
-
6
3
5
5
5
4
Source: California State Department of Health Services
68
-------
MONTHLY SUMMARY
OF GROSS ALPHA AND BETA RADIOACTIVITY IN CALIFORNIA AIR
(Alpha, fCi/m ; Beta,
October 1980
Month
Year
Station
ALPHA
BETA
Eureka
Humboldt Hill
Redding
Sacramento
Rancho Seco
Vallejo
Berkeley
Livermore
Salinas
San Luis Obispo
Diablo Canyon
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Onofre
San Diego
Barstow
El Centre
Summary
No. of
Samples
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
-
5
5
5
5
4
79
Max.
.9
.9
4.3
5.7
5.5
L0.3
2.5
.2.4
L4.6
3.2
7.4
-
4.7
4.1
2.0
5.8
3.3
14.6
Min.
.2
.0
1.2
.7
2.0
.6
.2
.2
.8
.9
1.7
-
1.7
1.6
.5
1.2
.7
.0
Averages
Mean
.7
.4
2.1
3.2
3.6
2.8
1.5
7.7
6.6
1.9
3.8
-
3.3
2.4
1.3
2.6
2.4
2.9
+
.6
.4
1.1
.8
1.0
1.0
.6
1.8
1.3
.8
1.9
-
1.5
1.2
.7
.9
1.0
1.0
No. of
Samples
9
9
9
9
9
9
18
9
9
8
5
-
9
5
9
8
7
141
Max.
60
71
164
83
114
103
133
123
143
74
185
-
127
87
205
239
183
239
Min
11
13
30
25
49
16
13
25
17
20
28
-
26
36
24
36
40
11
Averages
Mean
21
29
88
45
85
46
42
81
72
52
72
-
65
66
67
83
74
62
f
5
5
10
4
7
6
7
9
6
5
10
-
11
6
7
7
7
7
Source: California State Department of Health Services
69
-------
Table 30
MONTHLY SUMMARY
OF GROSS ALPHA AND BETA RADIOACTIVITY IN CALIFORNIA AIR
(Alpha, fCi/m5; Beta,
November 1980
Month
Year
Station
ALPHA
BETA
Kureka
Humboldt Hill
Redding
Sacramento
Rancho Seco
Vallc jo
Berkeley
Livermore
Salinas
San Luis Obispo
Diablo Canyon
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Onofre
San Diego
Barstow
El Centre
Summary
No. of
Samples
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
-
4
4
4
4
5
63
Max.
2.1
1.3
4.4
6.9
5.4
8.9
3.1
6.6
18.2
3.6
10.8
-
8.9
7.2
3.6
7.7
58.8
58.8
Min.
.2
.3
.0
1.1
1.2
.3
.5
3.0
4.8
.8
2.9
-
1.7
.4
1.4
2.1
1.1
.0
Averages
Mean
1.0
.8
2.0
3.4
3.2
3.3
1.8
4.7
10.7
2.2
6.8
-
3.8
3.5
2.7
4.4
11.1
4.1
+
.7
.5
1.1
.8
1.0
1.1
.7
1.4
1.5
.9
2.6
-
1.4
1.4
1.0
1.2
2.6
1.3
No. of
Samples
8
8
6
7
8
7
13
8
8
8
3
-
8
4
7
8
8
119
Max.
211
170
730
159
731
255
254
281
345
281
438
-
402
288
345
466
546
731
Min
30
48
212
66
97
79
71
140
107
95
323
-
98
136
139
144
148
30
Averages .
Mean
80
85
313
94
232
125
144
202
199
186
400
-
227
213
217
266
294
205
+
7
6
17
6
13
9
11
13
10
10
22
-
14
12
11
12
16
12
Source: California State Department of Health Services
70
-------
Table 31
MONTHLY SUMMARY
OF GROSS ALPHA AND BETA RADIOACTIVITY IN CALIFORNIA AIR
(Alpha, fCi/m5; Beta,
December 1980
Month
Year
Station
ALPHA
BETA
Eureka
Humboldt Hill
Redding
Sacramento
Rancho Seco
Vallejo
Berkeley
Livermore
Salinas
San Luis Obispo
Diablo Canyon
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Onofre
San Diego
Barstow
El Centro
Summary
No. of
Samples
4
4
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
-
5
4
5
5
5
77
Max.
3.1
2.1
5.3
3.5
9.4
4.2
4.6
24.1
31.7
7.0
7.7
-
5.2
10.6
7.7
6.5
12.5
31.7
Min.
.7
.0
1.3
.3
1.0
.8
.9
1.2
1.6
.6
2.1
-
1.4
3.4
.3
1.1
4.4
.0
Averages
Mean
1.3
1.0
2.6
1.2
5.3
2.3
2.6
8.1
14.1
3.1
4.6
-
2.9
5.7
2.6
3.2
7.9
4.3
+
.7
.5
1.3
.5
1.2
.9
1.1
1.9
1.6
.9
2.2
-
1.2
1.8
.9
1.0
1.7
1.2
No. of
Samples
9
9
10
8
10
10
10
9
8
10
6
-
10
4
10
10
10
143
Max.
321
234
457
176
288
248
380
438
442
381
775
-
493
345
505
418
440
775
Min.
52
50
176
54
125
73
88
128
108
108
98
-
178
243
124
173
284
50
Averages
Mean
118
134
305
91
191
147
215
229
270
278
434
-
279
276
279
272
339
241
+
10
8
21
6
11
10
14
13
11
13
23
-
16
12
13
13
15
13
Source: California State Department of Health Services
71
-------
* Minimum Detection Limit
* * Weekly Analysis of Charcoal Cartridge
NS= No Sample
Table 32
RADIOACTIVITY IN AIR COMPOSITES
pCi/1000m3
Second
1980
Quarter Year
Source: CA Department of Health
LOCATION
Eureka +
P P
Humbolclt Bay
Redding +
aacramento 4.
Rancho Seco N.G.S.
Vallejo
+
Derkeley
LJvcrmore
.*
.7..i 1 inns
+
Be-7
U7
5
62
8
175
13
33
U
97
6
60
7
56
n
61
7
62.
5
Zr-95
0.1*
0.1*
0.2*
0.1*
0.1*
0.2*
0.1*
0.2*
0.1*
Nb-95
0.2*
0.2*
o.U*
0.2*
0.2*
0.3*
0.2*
0.3*
0.2*
Ru-103
0.5*
0.5*
0.6
0.3
0.3*
0.1**
0.6*
O.U*
0.7*
O.U*
Ru-106
o.u*
0.3*
0.6*
0.3*
0.3*
0.5*
0.3*
0.5*
0.3*
Cs-137
0.0*
o.U
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
Ce-141
0.2*
0.2*
O.U
0.3
0.2*
0.2*
0.3*
0.1*
0.3*
0.2*
Ce-144
0.1*
0.1*
2.9
0.8
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
K-40
0.5*
0.5*
0.9*
o.u*
o.u*
0.6*
0.5*
0.8*
0.5*
Sr-89
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.5
o.u
0.3
0.2
Sr-90
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.1 -.
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
1-131**
0
2
0
2
NS
0
2
0
2
0
2
NS
0
2
NS
J
ro
-------
* Minimum Dete'ction Limit
* * Weekly Analysis of Charcoal Cartridge
NS= No Sample
Table 32 (Continued)
RADIOACTIVITY IN AIR COMPOSITES
pCi/ 1000m3
Second
1980
Quarter Year
Source: CA Department of Health
LOCATION
n Luis Obispo +
ablo Canyon N.P.P.
t
kersf ield
+
n Bernardino 4.
rstow
+
Centro
s Angeles +
n Onofre N.G.S.
4.
n Diego
+
Be-7
83
8
152
11
NS
NS
182
8
73
7
86
8
87
10
99
7
Zr-95
0.1*
0.3*
"0.1*
0.1*
0.2*
0.2*
0.2*
Nb-95
0.2*
o.u*
0.2*
0.2*
0.3*
0.2*
0.2*
Ru-103
0.6*
1.0*
o.U*
o.u*
0.6*
1.0*
0.6*
Ru-106
o.U*
0.7*
0.3*
0.3*
0.5*
0.6*
o.u*
Cs-137
o.u
0.2
0.5
0.3
0.8
O.I
0.5
O.2
o.u
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.5
O.I
Ce-141
0.3*
0.5*
0.2*
0.2*
0.3*
0.5*
0.3*
Ce-144
0.1*
0.2*
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
K-40
3.U
1.9
0.9*
o.u*
0.5*
0.7*
0.9*
0.6*
i
. - 4
Sr-S9
o.u
0.3
0.1
o.u
0.9
o.U
o.u
O.U
0.5
o.u
O.U
0.6
1.0
0.5
Sr-90
0.2
0.1
o.u
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
o.u
0.1
0.1
0.0
o.u"
0.1
1-131 **
0
2
0
2
NS
NS
0
2
0
2
NS
-------
* Minimum Detection Limit
* * Weekly Analysis of Charcoal Cartridge
NS= No Sample
Table 33
RADIOACTIVITY IN AIR COMPOSITES
pCi/1000m3
Third
1980
Quarter Year
Source: CA Department of Health Services
LOCATION
Eureka +
P P
Humbolclt Bay
Redding +
Sacramento +
Rancho Seco N.G.S.
Vallejo
+
Berkeley
Livcr-:iore
+
S.i I in-\s
1-
Be-7
U8
9
3U
6
18U
16
Ui
U
83
9
U7
10
58
5
68
5
68
5
Zr-95
0.2*
0.2*
Q.5*
0.1*
0.2*
0.3*
0.2*
0.1*
0.1*
Nb-95
0.3*
O.U*
0.8*
0.2*
O.U*
0.5*
0.2*
0.2*
0.1*
Ru-103
0.8*
0.9*
1.9*
0.5*
0.9*
1.1*
0.5*
0.5*
0.3*
Ru-106
0.6*
0.5*
l.l*
o.U*
0.5*
0.6*
0.5*
o.u*
0.2*
Cs-137
0.1*
0.1*
0.7
0.2
0.0*
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1*
0.1*
0.0*
Ce-141
0.3*
0.3*
0.7*
0.2*
o.U*
1.7
0.6
0.2*
0.2*
0.1*
Ce-144
0.2*
0.1*
0.3*
0.1*
0.2*
1.5
0.6
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
K-40
1.0*
U.6
2.6
l.U*
2.2
1.0
8.3
2.2
7.5
2.U
U.8
1.6
11.0
2.2
6.9
l.U
i
1
Sr-39
0.1
o.u
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.0
o.u
0.1
O.U
-0.1
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.3
.
Sr-90
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
o.u
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
1-131**
0
2
0
2
NS
0
2
0
2
0
2
NS
0
2
NS
-------
* Minimum Detection Limit
* * Weekly Analysis of Charcoal Cartridge
NS= No Sample
Table 33 (Continued)
RADIOACTIVITY IN AIH COMPOSITES
pCi/1000m3
Third
1980
Quarter Year
Source: CA Department of Health Servi
LOCATION
in Luis Obispo +
ablo Canyon N.P.P.
t
kersf ield
+
n Bernardino 4.
rstow
+
Centro
s Angeles +
n Onofrc M.G.S.
4-
i
n Dioijo
f-
Be-7
59
7
150
17
No Sa
No Sa
117
9
116
8
85
8
96
8
113
10
Zr-95
0.2*
0.6*
nple
nple
0.2*
0.2*
0.3*
0.2*
0.3*
Nb-95
o.u*
1.2*
o.u*
0.3*
o.U*
o.u*
0.5*
Ru-103
1.0*
2.6*
0.9*
0.7*
1.0*
0.9*
1.2*
Ru-106
0.5*
1.5*
0.6*
0.6*
0.7*
o.u*
0.7*
Cs-137
0.3
0.2
0.5*
0.2
0.1
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
0.1*
Ce-14l
l.U
0.5
1.0*
0.3*
0.3*
0.3*
0.3*
O.U*
Ce-144
0.2*
o.u*
-
0.2*
0.1*
0.2*
0,1*
0.2*
K-40
7.2
2.1
2.1*
5.6
2.0
U.3
1.7
6.7
2.U
11.1
2.7
8.9
2.6
i
Sr-89
-0.3
0.5
-0.2
1.1
-0.3
0.5
0.2
0.1+
-0.2
0.5
-0.3
0.8
0.7
0.6
Sr-90
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
1-131 **
0
2
0
2
NS
NS
0
2
0
2
NS
-------
i
Radlonuclides in California Milk ]
Although milk is only one of the sources of dietary intake of
environmental radioactivity, it is the food item that is most useful
as an indicator of the general population's intake of radionuclide
contaminants resulting from environmental releases. The objective of
this milk sampling network is to obtain information on current
radionuclide concentrations and long-term trends. From this
information the need for further investigation or corrective public
health action can be determined.
The California network consists of 10 stations, six of which are
from dairies close to.major nuclear facilities, and the other four
represent controls, composited from local miIksheds in similar
geographic locations from the plants. Samples are obtained quarterly
and analyzed immediately upon receipt.* Results are reported as pCi/1
with an -error of two standard deviations. Data for the second and
third quarters of 1980 are shown in Tables 34 and 35.
*Radionuclides are determined by gamma spectrescopy, with the
exception of iodine-131, which is analyzed in accordance with
procedures specified in USNRC Regulatory Guide 4.3, and strontium-89
and strontium-90, which are determined by radiochemical technique.
76
-------
TABLE 34 - RADIONUCLIDES IN CALIFORNIA MILK
pCi/1
Sampling
Date
1980
U-l
U-7
U-8
U-2
, U-8
U-8
U-3
U-20
U-20
U-3
Sa.T.pli.ic-;
Location
Del Ncrte County
Hu.T.boldt Bay North
Kmnboldt Bay South
Hunboldt County
Rancho Ssco North
Sancr.o Seco South
Sacramento County
Diablo Canyon North
Diablo Canyon South
San Luis Obispo County
Radio nuclide
K-UO
1110 + 32
11^8 + 21
10?U + 28
1150 + 20
1090 + 21
11U6 + 31
1116 + 19
1107 + 20
1106 + 16
1152 + 21
Ba-La-lHo
-2+U
0+2
-7 + 3 .
-1 + 2
1+2
-2 + U
0+2
1+2
0 _+ 2
-7+2
Cs-137
2 +_ 2
0+1
-1 +_ 2
1+1
-2+2
0+2
1+1
1 + 1
0 ± 1
-2+2
1-131*
0.0 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.1 + 0.1
0.1 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.1 + 0.1
0.1 + 0.1
0.0 +_ 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
Sr-89
1+2
2 +!
1+1
0 + 1
1+1
0+1
0 +_ 1
0 + 1
0 + 1
0+1
Sr-90
8.0 + 0.7
3.6 + 0.6
1.7 + O.U
2.0 + O.U
1.2 + 0.5
0.8 + O.U
l.U + O.U
0.7 +_ O.U
1.0 + O.U
0.6 + O.U
I-
* 1-131 analysis by ion exchange and precipitation method. Source: California Dept. Heelth Services
-------
Table 35 - RADIONUCLIDSS i?i CALIFORNIA MILK
Sampling
Date
7-9-80
7-28-80
7-28-80
7-8-80
7-8-80
7-8-80
7-6-80
7-20-80
7-20-80
7-22-80
,
Sampling
Location
Del Norte County
Humboldt Bay North
Humboldt Bay South
Humboldt County
Rancho Seco North
Rancho Seco South
Sacramento County
Diablo Canyon North
Diablo Canyon South
San Luis Obispo County
Radio nuclide
K-'-iO
11U6 + 18
1115 + 18
1071 + 17
1199 + 21
1110 + 28
1106 + 21
1118 + 29
1100 + 37
1177 + 23
llU? + 17
Ba-La-l>*0
3+2
2-1-2
1+2
k + 2
U + 3
1 + 2
1 ± 3
1 ± k
1+2
1+2
Cs-137
3 + 1
2+1
2+1
3+2
3+2
1+2
3 + 2
1 + 3
0+2
3 + 1
1-131*
0.0 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.1 4_ 0.1
0.1 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.0 +_ 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
0.0 + 0.1
Sr-PQ
1 + 1
0 + 1
0 ± 1
0+1
0 + 1
0+^1
0+1
0+1
0+1
1 + 1
Sr-QO
7.0 + 0.7
2.6 + 0.5
2.9 + 0.5
2.1 + O.U
2.0 +_ O.U
0.5 + 0.3
1.5 j; O.U
1.0 + 0.1*
0.8 + O.^J
1.2 + O.U
- * 1-131 analysis by ion exchange and precipitation method.
Source: California Department o^ Health
Servi
oo
-------
Radiological Health Laboratory
Indiana State Board of Health
Indiana Milk Analysis Program
In order to evaluate the fallout on Indiana pasturelands, the
State has implemented a program whereby monthly milk samples from
five geographical areas are sent to the Radiological Health
Laboratory of the State Board of Health. The milk in these samples
is bottled on the same date in all five areas to provide uniform time
from pasture to the lab.
Once in the laboratory, the milk is first analyzed by gamma
spectroscopy for iodine-131, barium-140, cesium-137, and
potassium-40. A one gallon sample is analyzed on a 3" x 3" Nal(Tl)
scintillation crystal for 4800 seconds. A background sample of
48,000 seconds is also run. The data are analyzed to give pCi/1 for
each radionuclide.
A quarterly composite sample is saved and run for strontium-89
and -90 by ion exchange method.
Data for the third and fourth quarters of 1980 and the first
quarter of 1981 are shown in Table 36.
79
-------
Table 36
INDIANA MILK ANALYSIS PROGRAM
(Third and Fourth Quarters of 1980
and First Quarter of 1981)
Concentrations of Selected Gamma Radionuclides in Pasteurized Milk
(pCi/1 ± 2 Sigma Counting Error)
Location
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
Date
1-131
Ba-140
Cs-137
K-40
6/80
6/80
6/80
6/80
6/80
3 ± 5
3 ± 5
2 ± 5
9 ± 5
0 ± 5
1 ± 5
0 ± 5
5 ± 5
0 ± 5
5 ± 5
3 ± 5
9 ± 5
0 ± 5
4 ± 5
4 ± 5
1021 ± 75
877 ± 72
970 ± 75
1073 ± 76
920 ± 74
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
7/80
7/80
7/80
7/80
7/80
0 ± 5
3 ± 5
1 ± 5
0 ± 5
4 ± 5
4 ±
9 ±
9 ±
5 ±
6 ±
5
5
5
5
5
2 ± 5
13 ± 5
7 ± 5
9 ± 5
1 ± 5
1000 ± 75
910 ± 73
980 ± 75
1010 ± 75
1010 ± 75
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
.' ..
IN: Evf$$ville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
8/80
8/80
8/80
8/80
8/80
7 ± 5
3 ± 5
16 ± 5
0 ± 5
2 ± 5
0 ±
2 ±
6 ±
0 ±
6 ±
5
5
5
5
5
5 ± 5
9 ± 5
13 ± 5
2 ± 5
8 ± 5
890 ± 70
897 ± 72
1016 ± 76
865 ± 71
912 ± 74
9/80
9/80
9/80
9/80
9/80
5 ± 5
11 ± 5
7 ± 5
9 ± 5
6 ± 5
6 ±
14 ±
7 ±
4 ±
2 ±
5
5
5
5
5
4 ± 5
21 + 6
11 ± 5
8 ± 5
12 ± 5
853 ± 72
963 ± 75
852 ± 72
873 ± 72
867 ± 72
IN: Evansville 10/80 10 ± 5
Fort Wayne (A) 10/80
Indianapolis 10/80 22+5
Rochester 10/80 5 ± 5
Seymour 10/80 5 ± 5
0 ± 5
0 ± 5
1 ± 5
4 ± 5
15 ± 6
18 ± 6
10 ± 5
8 ± 5
1247 ± 79
1182 ± 78
1132 ± 77
1084 ± 76
(A) Sample Not Received
80
-------
Table 36 ( Continued)
INDIANA MILK ANALYSIS PROGRAM
(Third and Fourth Quarters of 1980
and First Quarter of 1981)
Concentrations of Selected Gamma Radionuclides in Pasteurized Milk
(pCi/1 ± 2 Sigma Counting Error)
Location
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indiaanpolis
Rochester
Seymour
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
Date
1-131
Ba-140
Cs-137
K-40
11/80
11/80
11/80
11/80
11/80
2 ±
7 ±
0 ±
0 +
0 ±
6
6
6
6
6
0
0
2
1
0
± 6
± 6
+ 6
± 6
± 6
11 ±
16 ±
12 ±
13 ±
9 ±
7
7
7
7
7
1056
1092
1024
1152
1076
+
±
+
+
+
87
88
88
90
89
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
1 ± 5
0 ± 5
0 ± 5
6 ± 5
1 ± 5
2 ± 5
0 ± 5
4 ± 5
6 ± 5
4 ± 5
11 ± 5
7 + 5
8 ± 5
13 ± 6
10 ± 5
1094 ± 77
1163 ± 79
1136 ± 78
1117 ± 78
1097 ± 78
2
7
0
0
0
1
0
0
6
1
5
0
3
1
3
4
11
5
10
1
1
0
1
3
1
±
±
±
+
±
+
+
+
+
+
±
+
+
+
+
+
±
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
1/81
1/81
1/81
1/81
1/81
5 ± 6
0 ± 6
3 + 6
1 ± 6
3 ± 6
6 ± 6
6 ± 6
0 ± 6
5 ± 6
2 ± 6
3 ± 7
5 ± 7
8 ± 7
6 ± 7
6 + 7
925 ± 86
935 ± 86
956 ± 86
992 + 87
1102 ± 89
2/81
2/81
2/81
2/81
2/81
4 ± 6
11 ± 6
5 ± 6
10 ± 7
1 ± 6
1 ± 6
9 ± 6
5 ± 6
13 ± 6
2 ± 6
10 ± 7
22 ± 7
14 ± 7
24 ± 7
7 ± 7
907 ± 83
838 + 82
1002 + 85
1003 ± 86
930 ± 83
3/81
3/81
3/81
3/81
3/81
1 ± 6
0 ± 6
1 ± 6
3 ± 6
1 ± 6
4 ± 6
3 ± 6
4 ± 6
0 ± 6
0 ± 6
8 ± 7
9 ± 7
6+7
10 ± 7
1 ± 7
944 ± 85
985 ± 86
927 ± 85
1030 + 86
935 ± 84
81
-------
Table 36 (Continued)
QO RQ
Concentrations of y Sr and °'Sr in Pasteurized Milk
(pCi/1 ± 2 Sigma Counting Error)
Location
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
Date
6-9/80
6-9/80
6-9/80
6-9/80
6-9/80
90
Sr
2 ± 0.
2 ± 0.
2 ± 0,
2 ± 0,
2 ± 0.5
89Sr
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
10-12/80
10-12/80
10-12/80
10-12/80
10-12/80
1 ± 0.5
3 ± 0.6
2 ± 0.5
2 ± 0.5
2 ± 0.5
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
IN: Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Rochester
Seymour
1-3/81
1-3/81
1-3/81
1-3/81
1-3/81
2 ± 0.5
2 ± 0.5
1 ± 0.5
1 ± 0.5
1 ± 0.5
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
0 ± 0.3
82
-------
Radiological .Health Division
State Hygienic Laboratory of Iowa
Iowa Water Sampling Program
The radiological Health Division of the State Hygienic
Laboratory of Iowa with the assistance of the State Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) maintains a state-wide water sampling
program of community drinking waters, surface waters and
precipitation. All analyses with the exception of the sequential
Ra-226, -228 analyses are performed according to "Standard Methods
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 14th edition. The
sequential analyses for radiums are performed according to the EPA
publication, EPA-600/4-75-008, "Interim Radiochemical Methodology for
Drinking Water."
The drinking water samples are collected by DEQ regional
personnel and sent to the State Hygienic Laboratory where they are
preserved with HC1. These waters are analyzed for gross alpha and
gross beta radioactivity as a screening process. Subsequent analyses
for Ra-226, Ra-228, Sr-90 are performed if screening levels are
exceeded. Radium levels are of primary concern in Iowa drinking
waters as those levels are elevated in deep geologic aquifers within
the state.
Surface waters are collected at eleven sites throughout the
state with site selection being determined by proximity upstream and
downstream to nuclear power plants in Iowa or those plants
discharging Into rivers which are natural borders with adjoining
states. Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium are the routine
radionuclide analyses for these samples. Strontium is of interest
when gross beta screening levels are exceeded or if nuclear weapons
testing necessitates monitoring to determine its impact on the
environment.
The following environmental radiation data were contributed by
the State of Iowa. Data tables are as follows:
-------
Table 37
Table 38
Table 39
;Table 40
.Table 41
Table 42
Table 43
Table 44
Table 45
Table 46
Iowa City Precipitation (Tritium)
Gross Activity - Major Iowa Rivers
DEQ Mineral samples - July 1980
Alpha - Beta
DEQ Mineral samples - July 1980
226Ra - 228Ra (Alpha - Beta)
SDWA samples - July 1980
226Ra - 228Ra (Alpha - Beta)
DEQ Mineral samples - August 1980
Alpha - Beta
SDWA samples - August 1980
226Ra - 228Ra (Alpha - Beta)
DEQ Mineral samples - September 1980
226Ra - 228Ra (Alpha - Beta)
SDWA samples - September 1980
226Ra - 228Ra (Alpha - Beta)
SDWA samples - September 1980
90sr
84
-------
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
STATEWIDE DYNAMIC SURFACE WATER REPORT
Background Radiation Levels, Tritium
Data for 3rd Quarter 1980
IOWA CITY PRECIPITATION
Date Collected Date Counted 3_H[ Activity, nCi/1
07-16-80
07-18-80
07-22-80
07-29-80
08-01-80
08-05-80
08-06-80
08-11-80
08-18-80
08-21-80
09-02-80
09-04-80
09-08-80
09-09-80
09-12-80
09-15-80
09-17-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
<1.00
< 1 . 00
< 1 . 00
<1.00
Tl.OO
<1.00
<1,00
<1.00
-------
Table 37 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
STATEWIDE DYNAMIC SURFACE WATER REPORT
Background Radiation Levels, Tritium
Data for 3rd Quarter 1980
River
Cedar
Des Moines
:OW3
Mississippi
Missouri
Nishnabotna
Skunk
City
Cedar Rapids
Cedar Rapids
Cedar Rapids
Council Bluffs
Council Bluffs
Council Bluffs
Sioux City
Sioux City
Sioux City
Hamburg
Hamburg
Hamburg
Ames
Ames
Ames
Dates Collected
Composite Samples
7-8, 15, 22, 29-80
8-5, 12, 20, 26-80
9-2, 9, 16; 23, 30-80
Vinton
Vinton
Vinton
Oes Moines
Des Moines
Iowa City
Iowa City
Iowa City
Davenport
Davenport
Davenport
Dubuque
Dubuque
Dubuque
Lansing
Lansing
Lansing
7-7, 15
8-4, 11
9-2, 8,
8-5-80
9-7-80
7-2-80
8-1-80
9-2-80
7-9, 16
8-6, 15
9-4, 11
7-3, 11
8-7, 14
9-4, 12
7-7, 14
8-4, 18
9-3, 8,
, 21, 28-80
, 18, 25-80
15, 24, 29-80
, 22, 30-80
, 22, 28-80
, 17, 25-80
, 18, 25, 31-80
, 21, 28-80
, 18, 25-80
, 21, 28-80
, 25-80
15, 22, 29-80
7-9, 14, 23, 28-80
8-11, 18, 25-80
9-4, 8, 15, 22-80
7-7, 14, 21, 28-80
8-4, 11, 18, 25-80
9-2, 8, 15, 22, 29-80
7-7-80
8-4-80
9-2-80
7-3, 10, 17, 30-80
8-7, 28-80
9-4, 18, 25-80
Date Counted
11-08-80
11-08-30
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-03-80
11-08-80
11-03-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80 .
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-30
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
11-08-80
3H Activ.ity
nCi/1
<1.00
a. 00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a. oo
a, oo
a. oo
a. oo
86
-------
00
Table 38
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL SURFACE WATER SURVEILLANCE
GROSS ACTIVITY REPORTED AS pCi/1
Data for July, August, September 1980
RADIATION #
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA ACTIVITY
TS DS SS
, _____ , , - ;
BETA-GAMMA ACTIVITY
TS DS SS
i
SKUNK RIVER AT AMES ;
16676
16700
16719
16761
16804
16916
16930
17053
17132
16663
16699
16718
16735
16773
16806
16843
16857
16929
16941
17040
17078
17112
17159
07-03-80
07-10-80
07-17-80
07-30-80
08-07-80
08-28-80
09-04-80
09-18-80
09-25-80
Average of 9
07-01-80
07-08-80
07-15-80
07-22-80
07-29-80
08-05-80
08-12-80
08-20-80
08-26-80
09-02-80
09-09-80
09-16-80
09-23-80
09-30-80
Average of 14
4.4
4.5
3.6
2.2
4.6
2.8
3.1
3.8
6.6
4.0
CEDAR RIVER AT
1.3
1.9
1.8
1.1
2.1
1.4
1.1
1.0
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.5
3.6
1.7
1.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
1.4
2.8
6.2
2.6
CEDAR
0.9
1.6
1.5
0.6
2.0
0.4
0.9
0.8
1.0 '
1.1
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.5
1. A
0.8
2.8
2.4
Nil
2.5
0.7
1.7
1.0
0'.4
1.0
'RAPIDS
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.1
1.0
0.2
0.2
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.5
4
3
5
1
4
2
6
3
1
3
4
4
6
5
3
3
2
6
5
8
5
6
5
1
5
1
3
5
1
4
1
3
3
1
2
4
4
5
4
2
3
?
5
4
5
5
5
4
1
4
3
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
1
3
Nil
Nil
1
Nil
Nil
1
1
1
Nil
Nil
1
1
3
Nil
1
1
Nil
1
-------
Table 38 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA-
RADIOLOGICAL SURFACE WATER SURVEILLANCE
GROSS ACTIVITY REPORTED AS pCi/1
Data for July, August,. September 1980
RADIATION #
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA ACTIVITY
TS DS SS
BETA-GAMMA ACTIVITY
TS . DS SS
MISSOURI RIVER AT COUNCIL BLUFFS
16709
1-6732
16737
16774
16813
16855
16917
16942
16986
17054
17110
16698
16717
16741
16762
16801
16844
16868
16895
16983
17039
17080
17111
07-09-80
07-14-80
07-23-80
07-28-80
08-11-80
08-18-80
08-25-80
09-04-80
09-08-80
09-15-80
09-22-80
Average of
07-09-80
07-16-80
07-22-80
07-30-80
08-06-30
08-15-80
08-22-80
03-28-80
09-04-80
09-11-80
09-17-80
09-25-80
Average of
2.5
' 4.2
4.5
3.4
2.7
4.5
8.0
3.0
3.6
7.3
8.4
11 4.7
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
1.4
1.8
11.8
1.5
O.S
1.3
1.6
1.2
0.3
1.8
1.1
1.4
12 2.2
1.9
3.5
3.4
2.6
1.4
3.2
6.9
1.6
2.7
3.2
7.0
3.4
AT
0.9
1.7
7.2
1.2
0.6
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.4
0.6
1.4
0.6
0.7
1.1
0.8
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.4
0,9
4.1
1.4
1.3
DAVENPORT
0.5
0.1
4.6
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.4
0.5
1.0
0.7
0.3
0.8
8
3
3
4
1
6
4
7
10
5
3
5
6
7
5
3
3
4
4
4
5
4
6
6
5
8
3
:3
4
1
4
2
7
8
5
Nil
4
6
3
5
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
5
3
4
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
2
2
Nil
2
Nil
3
1
N i 1
4
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
1
1
1
Nil
1
3
1
-------
Table 38 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL SURFACE WATER SURVEILLANCE
GROSS ACTIVITY REPORTED AS pCi/1
Data for July, August, .September 1980
RADIATION
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA ACTIVITY
TS DS SS
BETA-GAMMA ACTIVITY
TS DS SS
DES MOINES RIVER AT DES MOINES
16795
16948
08-04-80
09-07-80
Average of 2
2.9
4.3
3.6
2.7
3.4
3.0
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT
16677
16710
16729
16740
16772
16803
8 16841
16869
16918
16940
17051
17079
17133
16711
16802
16925
16662
16763
16920
07-03-80
07-11-80
.07-18-80
07-25-80
07-31-80
08-07-80
' 08-14-80
08-21-80
08-28-80
09-04-80
09-12-80
09-18-80
09-25-80
Average of 13
07-07-80
08-04-80
09-02-80
Average of 3
07-02-80
08-01-80
09-02-80
Average of 3
0.8
2.4
1.4
1.4
1.0
1.2
0.6
3.9
1.2
1.1
0.8
0.7
2.1
1.4
NISHNABOTNA RI
1.7
2.4
1.6
1.9
IOWA RIVER
3.1
5.2
2.3
3.5
0.6
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.0
0.5
2.8
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.9
VER AT
0.6
1.4
1.0
1.0
AT IOWA
3.0
5.0
1.2
3.0
0.2
0.9
0.6
DUBUQUE
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
1.1
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
1.2
0.5
HAMBURG
1.1
1.0
0.6
0.9
CITY
0.1
0.2
1.1
0.5
5
8
7
7
6
4
5
4
3
4
1
4
4
5
4
4
4
9
3
8
7
3
2
7
4
5
7
:6
6
6
4
4
4
3
4
1
4
4
4
3
3
4
9
2
8
6
3
2
5
3
Nil
1
1
1
Nil
Nil
1
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
1
1
1
Nil
Nil
1
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
2
. 1
-------
Table 38 ( Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL SURFACE WATER SURVEILLANCE
GROSS ACTIVITY REPORTED AS pCi/1
Data for July, August, September 1980
10
o
RADIATION #
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA ACTIVITY
TS DS SS
BETA-GAMMA ACTIVITY
TS DS SS
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT LANSING
16681
16715
16736
16756
16799
16853
16871
16927
1694-1
17043
17108
17135
16679
16713
16734
16755
16800
16808
16854
16873
16928
16943
17042
17107
17137
07-07-30
07-14-80
07-21-80
07-28-80
08-04-80
08-18-80
08-25-80
09-03-80
09-08-80
09-15-80
09-22-80
09-29-80
Average of 12
07-07-80
07-14-80
07-21-80
07-28-80
08-04-80
08-11-80
08-18-80
08-25-80
09-02-80
09-08-80
09-15-80
09-22-80
09-29-30
Averaue of 13
3.4
' 3.0
3.6
5.2
1.8
2.1
4.9
1.9
1.3
0.8
1.2
0.8
2.5
MISSOURI RIVER
2.2
2.6
4.3
3.4
3.6
3.5
2.9
2.6
3.3
5.0
2.5
4.2
2.2
3.3
2.7
2.4
1.3
4.6
1.7
0.8
4.6
1.2
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.4
1.8
AT SIOUX
1.2
1.8
3.3
2.6
2.9
2.4
2.1
1.6
1.4
3.7
1.4
2.8
1.8
2.2
0.7
0.6
2.3
0.6
0.1
1.3
0.3
0.7
0.9
0.1
0.7
0.4
0.7
CITY
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.7
1.1
0.8
1.0
2.4
1.3
1.1
1.4
0.4
1.1
3
5
5
1
4
2
1
5
5
4-
5
4
4
7
5
7
9
Nil
6
Nil
6
5
3
6
10
3
5
3
5
4
1
3
2
Nil
5
4
4
4
4
3
7
5
6
8
Nil
4
Nil
6
5
3
6
8
3
5
Nil
Nil
1
Nil
1
Nil
1
Nil
1
Nil
1
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
1
1
Nil
2
Nil
Nil
Nil
0
Nil
2
Nil
Nil
-------
Table 38 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL SURFACE WATER SURVEILLANCE
GROSS ACTIVITY-REPORTED AS pCi/1
Data for July, August, September 1980
ALPHA ACTIVITY BETA-GAMMA ACTIVITY
RADIATION # DATE SAMPLED TS DS SS TS DS SS
CEDAR RIVER AT VINTON
16680
16714
16733
16758
16797
16809
16852
16872
16924
16945
17041
17109
17136
07-07-80
07-15-80
07-21-80
07-28-80
08-04-80
08-11-80
08-18-80
08-25-80
09-02-80
09-08-80
09-15-30
09-24-80
09-29-80
Average of 13
0.8
4.2
1.7
2.7
0.6
0.9
1.1
3.4
4.6
3.3
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
0.3
3.4
1.4
1.2
0.5
0.8
1.1
3.0
3.6
1.6
1.3
0.5
1.1
1.5
0.5
0.8
0.3
1.5
0.1
0.1
Nil
0.4
1.0
1.7
0.4
1.4
1.0 .
0.7
2
4
3
3
4
3
4
6
4
5
4
7
4
4
2
4
2
3
4
3
4
3
3
5
3
4
3
3
Nil
Nil
1
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
3
1
Nil
1
3
1
1
-------
10
ro
Table 39
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
D.E.Q. MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for July .1980
pCi/1
TOWN
DEQ Region 2
Blencoe
Blencoe
New Albin
Tabor
Tabor
Shenandoah
Logan
Blairs town
Badger
South English
Bancroft
Blue Grass
Clarion
Van Home
Lansing
Lowden
COUNTY
Cerro Gordo
Monona
Monona
Allamakee
Fremont
Fremont
Page
Harrison
Benton
Webster
Keokuk
Kossuth
Iowa
Wright
Benton
Allamakee
Cedar
IDENTIFICATION
NWSPC Co
Well
Well
Raw
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Weel
Well
#1,
#2,
. , Lagoon
85'
85'
water
#2,
#1.
#20
#7,
#1,
#3,
#4,
n
#2,
ftl
#2,
#2,
#1,
62'
62'
60'
Raw water
Raw
330'
640'
1870'
805'
1500'
MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
15570
15575
15576
15579
15587
15589
15590
15620
15640
15656
15663
15669
15671
15672
15674
15676
15683
10-17-79
10-18-79
10-22-79
10-24-79
10-24-79
10-25-79
11-06-79
11-15-79
11-15-79
11-29-79
12-05-79
12-06-79
12-06-79
12-10-79
12-10-79
- 12-11-79
ALPHA
7
: 15
3
9
3
6
14
13
5
6
11
5
3
5
10
3
3
.9
.8
.6
.6
.1
.0
.2
.4
.0
.9
.8
.4
.7
.9
.2
BETA
1191.0
Nil
10
2
5
9
16
Nil
17
3
13
3.0
5
1
7
8
14
-------
Table 39 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
D.E.Q. MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for .July 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Fenton
Deloit
Blairsburg
Panama MWS
Panama
Panama
Delaware
Ledyard
Wesley
Wes 1 ey
Donahue
Perry
Lake Mill
Magnol ia
Rings ted
Graettinger
COUNTY
Kossuth
Crawford
Hami 1 ton
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby
Delaware
Kossuth
Kossuth
Kossuth
Scott
Dallas
Winnebago
Harrison
Emmet
Palo Alto
IDENTIFICATION
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
#1
#4
n
n
#2
#4
11
#1
n
#2
#i
Composi
12 1?
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
1
1
1
1
a 2
31
?4
#5
, 229'
, 53'
, 350'
, 39'
, 40'
, 40'
, 335'
, 1035'
, 302'
, 407'
te Wells it'll,
14,15,16,17,19
, 425'
, 235'
, raw
, raw
MINERAL #
15688
15690
15701
15703
15704
15706
15714
15715
15732
15733
15734
15737
15741
15743
15764
15770
DATE SAMPLED
12-12-79
12-12-79
12-19-79
12-20-79
12-20-79
12-20-79
12-26-79
12-27-79
01-08-80
01-08-80
01-08-80
01-07-80
01-10-80
01-10-80
01-14-80
01-14-80
ALPHA
4.
3.
10.
8.
3.
3.
3.
4.
4.
3.
3.
9.
3.
11.
7.
7i
8
7
0
4
9
6
0
7
3
6
9
2
3
1
3
3
BETA .
1
1
Ni
1
Nil
1
Nil
4
2
4
4
Ni
13
3
5
3
52
1
-------
Table 39 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIFM'C LAPO^A
IOWA CITY. IOWA
: RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
D.E.Q. MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for July 19HO
TOWN
Badger
Pleasantvil le
Dallas Melche
Dayton
Independence
Odebolt
Rockwell City
Farnhamvi 1 le
Lohrvi 1 le
Mechanicsvi 1 le
Stan ton
Stanton
Preston
Andrew
Linnevi 1 le
Clennont
Grafton
COUNTY
Webster
Marion
Marion
Webster
Buchanan
Sac
Calhoun
Calhoun
Calhoun
Cedar
Montgomery
Montgomery
Jakcson
Jackson
Jasper
Fayette
Worth
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Wei I
Well
#2, raw
*1, 2405'
»1, 2500'
»2, 1240'
MHI East
#8, 2131'
*5, 1965'
HI, 776'
43. 645'
?3, 455'
if 2, 150'
~1, 158'
*1, 720'
ifl, 250'
₯3
f?2, 240'
?2, 295'
MINERAL ?' DATE SAMPLED
15772'
15773
15730
15783
15735
15796
15797
15798
15799
15^00
15802
'15303
158C5
1 5305
15817
15819
15320
01-14-80
01-17-30
01-17-30
01-21-80
01-22-80
01-22-80
01-22-80
01-22-30
01-22-80
01-24-80
Oi-23-SO
01-23-80
Ul-24-.';0
01-29-30
01-29-80
' 01-29-80
pCi; ;
ALPHA
5.9
8.3
5.1
13.0
. . 0.9
3.7
10.0
6.9
2.3
3.0
5.7
1:5
1.3
1.2 .
9.5
1.5
2.9
1
BETA
Nil
13
18
6
3
13
22
4
Nil
3
Nil
1
5
5
Nil
3
Nil
-------
Table 39 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
D.E.Q. MINERAL ANALYSIS
Data for July 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Grafton
Grinnel 1
Sloan
Smithland
Springbrook
Baldwin
Hornick
Wil 1 iamsburg
Batavia
Richland
Grandview
Goldfield
Dayton
COUNTY
Worth
Poweshiek
Wood
Woodbury
Jackson
Jackson
Woodbury
Iowa
Jefferson
Keokuk
Louisa
Wright
Dallas
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
n, 186'
#8, Jordan
#3, 97'
#1, 65'
#1, 1035'
n, 160'
*2
s»5, 270'
?1, 100'
#1, 1870'
, raw water
n, 200'
#2, 430' FEE
MINERAL #.
15821
15825
15826
15827
15828
15829
15830
15831
15844
15845
15857
15866
16278
DATE SAMPLED
01-29-80
01-31-80
01-30-80
01-31-80
01-31-80
01-30-80
01-31-80
02-06-80
02-07-80
02-12-80
02-14-80
06-11-80
ALPHA
1.9
9.1
3.4
3.2
2.4
2.1
1.2
0.9
1.7
22.5
1.5
1.9
1.9
BETA
3
12
9
10
2
4
3
4
Nil
23
Nil
2
7
-------
Table 40
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN
St. Charles
New Liberty
Glidden
Bridgewater
Hampton
ID Freeport
Belmond
Stockton
Maysvil le
Atal isa
Mallard
Rockford
Rockford
Mai vern
Coral vil le
Oxford
COUNTY
Madison
Scott
Carroll
Adair
Franklin
Winneshiek
Wright
Muscatine
Scott
Muscatine
Palo Alto
Floyd
Floyd
Mills
Johnson'
Johnson
IDENTIFICATION
Well #2, 51 \ FEE
Well #1, 210'
Well #6, 171'
Well #2
Well i?3
Well #1, 400'
Well n
Well
Well
Well
Raw well
Well n, 185'
Well #2, 215'
Well ?9
Well #6
Well
MINERAL #
15352
15735
15861
15864
15865
15868
15870
15872
15873
15375
15877
15887
15891
15909
15913
15915
DATE SAMPLED
07-10-79
01-08-80
02-13-80
02-14-80
02-13-80
02-14-80
02-14-80
02-18-80
02-19-80
02-18-80
02-20-80
02-22-80
02-28-80
02-28-80
03-03-80
ALPHA
0.7
2.7.
1.5
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.7
1.2
1.3
2.1
2.9
0.8
0.3
1.3
1.5
0.9
pCi/1
BETA 226Ra 229Ra
3
8
1
10
4
4
4
3
5
. 2
3
2
Nil
2
11
-------
VO
Table 40 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Ladora
Shelby
Muscatine
Rural Water System
Iowa City
Iowa City
Iowa City
Barnum
COUNTY
Iowa
Shelby
Muscatine
Cherokee
Johnson
Johnson-
Johnson
Webster
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
New
#6, 57'
323', FEE
#MC3, 376' FEE
tfD-39, 500'
#D-40
#0-41
well FEE
MINERAL #
15916
15932
16219
16234
16270
15271
16301
16315
DATE SAMPLED
03-03-80
03-06-80
05-15-80
05-22-80
05-30-80
06-09-80
06-26-80
ALPHA
2
2
2
4
5
12
6
4
.7
.8
.0
.3
.6
.1
.0
.7
BETA
Nil
Nil
10
15
4
6
19
5
226Ra
1
<0
0
1
2
.0
.2
.7
.1
.0
228Ra
<0.6
1.4
<0.6
1.3
2.4
-------
Table 41
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN
Exi ra
:_anesboro
Runnel Is
-0
DO
^omestead
Neola
Cleghorn
COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
Audubon Finished 147-20A
11-19-79
02-19-80
Carroll Well #2, 148' 14992A 04-30-79
08-14-79
11-19-79
02-12-80
Polk Well n, 2500' 14994A 04-30-79
08-07-79
11-27-79
Iowa Well if 17 15088A 05-22-79
08-24-79
Pottawattamie Well *4, 112' 15101A 05-29-79
08-28-79
12-03-79
03-31-80
Cherokee Well #2, 430' 15156A 06-04-79
10-02-79
04-03-80
06-23-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 226Ra 229Ra
3.3 6 <0.2 <0.6
2.7 6 0.6 <0.6
12 18 4..1 0.2
6.0 15 4.7 2.0
4.6 7 0.5 2.3
. 0.4 9
-------
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL jf DATE SAMPLED
Pierson Woodbury Well £1, 26" 15166A
Well #2, 29' 09-17-79
12-11-79 .
03-25-80
Hardy Humboldt Well #1, 90' 15193A ' 06-11-79
08-30-79
11-13-79
02-04-80
Odebolt Sac Well #8, 2131' 15194A 06-11-79
09-11-79
Jg 12-17-79
03-31-80
Castalia Winnishiek Well ?1, 1000' 15226A 06-18-79
11-13-79
03-10-80
' 06-09-30
Stanhope Hamilton Well #3, 535' 15229A 06-05-79
12-17-79
04-08-80
06-18-80
Hull Sioux Finished 15233A 06-19-79
10-02-79
12-11-79
03-31-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA :2r'Ra 228Ra
4.3 8 <0.1 1.2
14 7 5.4 0.8
23 51 6.2 <0.6
2.8 3 2.0 .09
5.1 15 1.3 1.1
7.6 24 . 2.5 1.7
-------
o
o
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Ankeny Polk
Ankeny Pol k
Ankeny Dallas
i
>
>
Smith! and Woodbury
Pocahontas Pocahontas
Holmes Wright
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL ff DATE SAMPLED
Well §1, 575-1 15241A 06-19-79
09-19-79
12-21-79
03-17-80
Well #1, 105' 15243A 06-19-79
09-19-79
12-21-79
Well #1, 500' 15244A
Well #2, 675' 09-20-79
12-21-79
03-17-80
Well n, 95' 15245A 06-18-79
09-20-79
03-03-80
06-10&11-80
Finished 15285A
09-18-79
12-24-79
03-20-80
Well n, 200' 15316A 06-26-79
09-18-79
12-18-79
03-11-30
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 22<5Ra 228Ra
5.1 7 0.5 <0.6
2.4 5 0.8 0.7
17.0 10 8.3 2.1
5.6 5^ 0.5 <0.6
5.7 13 1.1 1.2
6.1 11 5.9 1.3
-------
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN COUNTY
West Liberty Cedar
Dow City Crawford
Maquoketa Jackson
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
Well 400' . 15331A 07-17-79
12-11-79
03-10-80
06-09-80
Finished 15349A 07-09-79
10-09-79
01-21-80
04-15-80
Finished 15512A 09-19-79
12-12-79
03-11-80
06-09-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 226Ra 228Ra
4.5 11 0.7 2.0
6.2 10 0.2 1.9
3.9 10 2.9 3.7
-------
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SOWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN
COUNTY
IDENTIFICATION
MINERAL #
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA
pCi/1
BETA
22f:
:Ra
228Ra
Shellsburg
Ute
Benton
Monona
Well #1, 1726' . 14873A
Well #3, 60'
14895A
03-20-79
07-19-79
10-16-79
04-14-80
03-27-79
08-07-79
11-26-79
'3.9
3.4
1.6
0.5
<0.6
0.4
gChurdan
Marion
Cl inton
West Bend
Greene Well #1401 pm, 160' 14936A
Linn . Finished 15017A
Clinton Finished 15076A
Palo Alto Well j'4, 1360' 15085A
04-16-79
07-24-79
11-20-79
04-07-30
05-07-79
08-13-79
11-26-79
02-25-80
05-22-79
08-27-79
12-11-79
03-10-80
05-22-79
08-29-79
11-26-79
02-11-80
9.1
2.9
2.9
15.2
Nil 0.6
10
17
33
2.4
2.1
8.9
<0.4
<0.4
0.7
3.4
-------
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN
COUNTY
IDENTIFICATION
MINERAL
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA
pCi/1
BETA 22eRa
228Ra
Alleman
iest Amana
Polk
Iowa
Well fl, 660'
Well
15086A
15087A
05-22-79
08-20-79
11-19-79
03-03-80
05-22-79
08-24-79
01-28-80
7.1
2.8
10
1.2
0.1
<0.4
<0.4
"ort Dodge
o
CO
:eWitt
urray
Webster
Clinton
Clark
Well #17, 15, 12, 15121A
9, 8
Well #5, 1421' 15130A
Well 2700' 15131A
06-04-79
09-04-^79
12-04-79
03-11-80
05-04-79
09-18-79
12-11-79
03-10-30
06-05-79
09-05-79
12-03-79
03-04-80
13.7
5.0
16.1
17
21
3.8
2.0
7.2
1.1
<0.6
0.7
'ason City
Cerro Gordo Well HI
15142A
09-11-79
02-18-80
04-08-80
4.5
Nil 0.7
<0.7
-------
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN
Casey
Hedrick
Bagley
Searsboro
Liscomb
Minburn
pCi/1
COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA ?2*Ra
Guthrie Finished 15158A 06-11-79 2.8 Nil 0.1
09-25-79
01-03-80
Keokuk Well #2, 2050' 15163A 06-11-79 4.0 20 3.0
09-17-79
12-17-79
03-17-80
Guthrie Well 95' 15164A 06-11-79 4.8 11 1.5
09-10-79
12-04-79
03-24-80
Poweshiek Well jl, 110' 15165A 06-12-79 3.2 11 1.6
09-10-79
12-18-79
Marshall Well s?2, 168' 15189A 2.5 4 0.6'
09-04-79
11-27-79
02-20-30
Dallas Finished 15191A 06-13-79 3.6 1 <0.2
10-17-79
01-15-80
04-02-80
228Ra
0.7
<0.6
<0.7
<0.6 '
<0.7
<0."7
-------
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
pCi/1
TOWN COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 226Ra
Boxholm Boone Well #1, 1949' . 15192A 06-12-79 5.1 14 3.2
09-17-79
12-03-79
03-03-80
Charles City Floyd Well #1, 300' 15264A 06-19-79 3.0 Nil 0.4
o Battle Creek Ida Finished 15324A 06-13-79 2.5 3 0.4
*" 09-17-79
12-17-79
03-03-80
Wheatland Clinton Well #1, 1328' 15398A 08-06-79 3.8 11 2.2
09-12-79
01-02-80
03-24-80
228Ra
<0.7
<0.6
<0.6
0.2
-------
Table 41 (Continued);
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
Collins Story Well #3, 2535' 15051 A 05-14-79
08-21-79
11-28-79
01-14-80
Stuart Guthrie Finished 15056A 05-14-79
08-13-79
11-13-79
02-19-80
Linn Grove Buena Vista Well #3, 45' 15058A 05-14-79
o 08-14-79
°* 11-13-79
02-15-80
Toledo Tama Well #7, 2016' 15061A 05-15-79
09-10-79
11-19-79
02-11-80
Arion Crawford Well #2, 42' 15064A 05-14-79
08-06-79
11-05-79
02-05-80
Cushing Woodbury Well #1, 40' 15069A 05-14-79
08-13-79
11-13-79
01-14-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 226Ra 228Ra
16.1 22' 6.9 3.7
17.8 58 13.2 2.8
6.6 8 0.3 0.9
5.7 30 5.0 2.3
16.1 30 0.1 1.2
2.4 7 0.1 0.7
-------
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN COUNTY IDENTIFICATION
Rose Hill . Mahaska Finished
Britt Hancock Well #1, 296 '"
Atkins Benton Well #1, 456'
Fredericksburg Chickasaw Well 185'
Ankeny Polk Well #142, 25'
Dunlap Harrison Well #1&2, 85'
MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
15083A 05-23-79
08-21-79
11-20-79
0.2-19-80
15128A 06-04-79
09-04-79
12-03-79
03-03-80
15129A 06-04-79
09-17-79
12-18-79
04-08-80
15133A 06-05-79
10-29-79
03-17-80
06-16-80
15252A 06-19-79
09-19-79
12-21-79
03-17-80
15257A 06-19-79
09-06-79
12-18-79
03-18-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 226Ra '228Ra
3.9 4 1.7 .1.9
2.6 4 1.1 0.8
*
4.7 9 4.6 2.0
1.0 2
3.4 Nil 0.1 1.3
4.9 9 1.4 2.0
-------
o
00
Table 41 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for July 1980
TOWN
Twin Lake
Elberon
Muscatine
Des Moines
Evansdale
pCi/1
COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL i DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 22GRa 228Ra
Calhoun Well #1, 139' 15275A 06-19-79 1.8 7
10-31-79
03- -80
06-10-80
Tama Well #1,655' 15304A 06-26-79 ' 3.7 10 2.2 3.1
12-31-79
03-06-80
Muscatine Well 60' 15432A 08-14-79 1.5 1
12-03-79
03-03-80
06-09-80
Des Moines Well 193' 15475A 08-28-79 0.5 Nil
11- -79
03-04-80
05-29-80
Black Hawk Well #3, 305' 15522A 09-25-79 1.1 1
12-18-79
03-18-80
06-16-80
-------
Table 42
o
vo
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN
Soldier
Maquoketa
Lamotte
Roland
Epworth
Epworth
Epworth
Eddy vi lie
Edgewood
Edgewood
D-21 Sample a
Cascade
Amber-
Paul 1 ina
Strawberry Point
COUNTY
Monona
Jackson
Jackson
Story
Dubuque
Dubuque
Dubuque
Wapel lo
Clayton
Clayton
Johnson
Dubuque
Jones
O'Brien
Clayton
IDENTIFICATION
Well 800' '
Well #3, 60'
Well #1, 865'
Well South
Well #2
Well #3
Well #4
Well
Well *1, 260'
Well #2, 268'
FEE
Well #4, 244'
Well »1, 405'
Well i? 5
Well #4, 240'
MINERAL #
14805
15880
15903
15934
15939
15940
15941
15949
15956
15957
15969
15970
15971
15977
15981
DATE SAMPLED
03-08-79
02-19-80
02-27-80
03-07-80
03-04-80
' 03-04-80
03-04-80
03-11-80
03-12-80
03-12-80
03-12-80
03-17-80
03-17-80
03-17-80
03-18-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA
. 4.6
1.2
2.1
1.7
0.5
1.9
1.1
1.5
1.7
0.6
20.6
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.3
64
g°Sr = <0.41 pCi/1
1
15
6
5
2
3
4
Nil
1
55
90Sr = <0.41 pCi/1
Nil
3
5.1
Nil
-------
Table 42 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Plainfield
Strawberry Point
Winthrop .
Schleswig MWS
Rock Valley
Gilmore City
Palmer
Wi 1 ton
Kirkman
Plymouth
Avoca MWS
Avoca
Osage
Os age
Danbury
Solon
COUNTY
Bremer
Clayton
Buchanan
Crawford
Sioux
Pocahontas
Pocahontas
Muscatine
Shelby
Cerro Gordo
Pottawattamie
Pottawattamie
Mitchell
Mitchell
Woodbury
Johnson
IDENTIFICATION
Well HI, 150'
Well #3, 259'
Well 230'
Well #2
Well #3
Well #3
Ground water
Well £2
Well n, 551'
Well #1, 268'
Well ?4, 30'
Well #5
Well ~:4, 710'
Well =2, 675'
Well ?4
Well n
MINERAL §
15988
15982
15990
15992
15993
15994
15996
15998
16000
16004
16007
16003
16030
16012
16013
16021
DATE SAMPLED
03-18-80
03-16-80
03-20-80
03-20-80
03-21-80
03-21-80
03-25-80
03-26-30
03-27-80
03-27-30
03-26-80
03-26-80
03-27-80
04-01-80
ALPHA
1.0
. 2.0
1.7
2.3
2.7
1.1
1.5
0.9
1.1
1.9
1.2
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.0
1-2-.
BETA
Nil
2
4
7
8
4
12
3 .
3
3
11
4
2
4
5
2
-------
Table 42 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Klemme
Center Point
Delta
Alexander
Sabula
Britt
Britt
Britt
Westgate
Ossian
Woden
Ft. Atkinson
Goodell
Goodell
Garner
Garner
COUNTY
Hancock
Linn
Keokuk
Frankl in
Jackson
Hancock
Hancock
Hancock
Fayette
Winneshiek
Hancock
Winneshiek
Hancock
Hancock
Hancock
Hancock
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Wei 1
Well
Well
n, 15121
£4, 470'
#8
# East, 220'
#2, 100'
T'!
=2
?3
fl, 93'
rl, 984'
*!
?1
0
=1, 192'
,?2
ifl
MINERAL ?
16025
16030
16040
16042
16045
16053
16054
16055
16092
16130
16136
16137
16138
16139
16140
16141
DATE SAMPLED
04-02-80
04-03-80
04-08-80
04-09-80
04-08-80
04-11-80
04-11-80
04-11-80
04-21-30
04-28-80
04-29-80
ALPHA
2.
. 2.
1.
1.
1.
2.
0.
2.
0.
1.
1.
1.
Ni
2.
1.
2.
0
4
2
2
7
5
9
9
9
8
6
0
1
4
2
1-
BETA
6
5
Nil
2
1
4
4
4
13
1
5
3
3
3
Nil
2
-------
Table 42 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Harper
Ames
Ames
Boyden
Spillville
South Amana
Princeton
We Us burg
Carl ise
La Porte City
Dows
Dows
Denver
Denver
Anamosa
Anamosa
COUNTY
Keokuk
Story
Story
Sioux
Winneshiek
Iowa
Scott
Grundy
Warren
Black Hawk
Wright
Wright
Bremer
Bremer
Jones
Jones
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Wei 1
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Wei 1
Well
?4, 1.13'
#15
rf!6
#5
#1, 545'
=12, 23'
£1, 455'
*3
,74
92, 250'
-:4
?5, 752'
S3, 180'
#4, 1000'
si, 350'
*2, 405'
MINERAL $
16146
16161
16162
16167
16169
16172
16180
16185
16190
16192
16195
16196
16199
16200
16202
16203
DATE SAMPLED
04-30-80
05-06-80
05-06-80
05-05-80
05-06-80
05-06-80
05-08-80
05-08-80
05-13-80
05-13-80
05-13-80
05-13-80
05-13-80
05-13-80
05-14-80
05-14-80
ALPHA
1.4
; 0.4
1.2
2.1
1.1
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.0
2.4
1.1
0.4
0.6
2.5
2.4
1.6 '
' BETA
11
6
6
9
1
3
2
7
4
12
6
10
4
14
Nil
4
-------
Table 42 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Audubon
Audubon
Ridgeway
Marshal 1 town
Marshall town
Everly
00 Kanawha
Farmington
St. Charles
South Ainana
Middle Airiana
Main Aniana
Elgin
Elgin
East Amana
Bristow
COUNTY
Audubon
Audubon
Winneshiek
Marshall
Marshall
Clay
Hancock
Van Buren
Madison
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Fayette
Fayette
Iowa
Butler
IDENTIFICATION
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i;18
#19
#2,
#9,
#7,
#3
#1
*l,
*3,
= 13
=8,
*2,
r'3,
#2,
#1,
590'
270'
250'
38'
51'
,14,15,16-90'
36'
220'
150'
550'
165'
MINERAL #
16205
16206
16208
16214
16215
16230
16242
16241
16248
16250
16252
16253
16255
16257
16261
16262
DATE SAMPLED
05-13-80
05-13-80
05-14-80
05-15-80
05-15-80
05-22-80
05-28-80
05-29-80
06-03-80
06-03-80
06-03-80
06-03-80
06-04-80
06-04-80
06-05-80
06-05-80
ALPHA
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
.2
.8
.2
.5
.1
.2
.8
.4
.9
_?
.1
.0
.5
.9
.7
6 -.
BETA
1
2
Nil
1
3
10
2
1
2
7
Nil
n
H
Nil
3
7
Nil
-------
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN
New Hartford
New Hartford
Qyens
Spill ville
Baxter
Baxter
Harcourt
Fostoria
Ferguson
Moorland
Gowrie
Cowrie
Ft. Madison
Martensdale
Grand Junction
Parkersburg
COUNTY
Butler
Butler
Plymouth
Winneshiek
Poweshiek
Poweshiek
Webster
Clay
Marshall
Butler
Webster
Webster
Lee
Warren
Green
Butler
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
/l
BETA
2
Nil
7
4
1
1
16
4
7
a
15
8
2
5
Nil
Nil
-------
Table 42 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
PCi/1
TOWN
Parkersburg
Massena
Massena
Palo
Duncombe
Otho
Blue Grass
Blue Grass
Vincent
Vincent
Rippey
Allison
Louden
Duncombe
Renwick
Onawa
COUNTY
Butler
Cass
Cass
Linn
Webster
Webster
Scott
Scott
Webster
Webster
Greene
Butler
Cedar
Webster
Humboldt
Monona
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
FEE
Well
Well
Well
#2, 310'
#79-1
#79-2, 35'
#4, 285'
#1, 972'
#2, 1045'
' ' O
r d.
n
#2, 745'
#3
*1, 135'
ril, 284'
HZ, 585'
iiZ, 226'
New Well FEE
MINERAL #
16308
16312
16313
16314
16316
16317
16319
16320
16323
16324
16330
16344
16359
16355
16382
16437
DATE SAMPLED
06-23-80
06-26-80
06-26-80
06-25-80
06-26-80
*
06-26-80
06-24-80
06-24-80
06-28-80
06-23-80
07-01-80
07-07-80
07-10-80
07-11-80
07-22-80
ALPHA
1.0
0.4
1.2
1.8
2.0
0.5""
0.4
1
2.0
1.9
2.3
1
0.8
2.0
2.7
1.2
BETA
Nil
2
Nil
Nil
2
": 4
Nil
1
3
Nil
3
Nil
2
Nil
4
7
-------
Table 43
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN
Perry
Audubon
Mason City
Ocheyedan
Van Home
Gilmore City
pCi/1
COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL ft DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 22eRa 228Ra
Dallas Finished . 14957A 04-17-79 4.1 Nil 0.4 <0.5
07-09-79
11-05-79
04-07-80
Audubon Well 32' 14965A 04-23-79 1.5 3
09-28-79
12-31-79
07-21-80
Cerro Gordo M.C. High School 14993A 04-30-79 10.5 11 5.6 1.6 '
08-06-79
11-05-79
02-11-80
Osceola Well
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Sheldon . O'Brien
Hawarden Sioux
Hawarden Sioux
LaMotte Jackson
Manly Worth
Estherville Emmet
pCi/1
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 22SRa
Finished 15018A 05-07-79 11.1 12 0.4
08-27-79
12-03-79
03-03-80
Well #8-7-6-5-3, 40' 15059A 05-14-79 - 4.3 14 <0.2
08-13-79
11-05-79
02-11-80
Well H&2 15060A 05-14-79 6.3 12 <0.2
08-13-79
11-05-79
02-11-30
Well ?1, 865' 15062A 05-15-79 3.6 11 2.0
08-13-79
11-13-79
02-12-30
Finished 15066A 05-15-79 2.1 Nil 0.3
03-13-79
11-13-79
02-12-80
Well S4, 7, 9 & 10, 15070A 05-15-79 4.6 9 0.2
700' to 750' . 08-14-79
11-12-79
02-11-80
223Ra
2.3
<0.6
<0.6
<0.6
<0.6
<0.6
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Hudson Black Hawk
Swea City Kossuth
East Amana Iowa
South Ainana Iowa
Harcourt Webster
Lester Lyon
pCi/1
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 226Ra
424 2nd Street 15071 A. 05-21-79 Nil 8
08-20-79
11-26-79
07-28-80
Well 471' 15084A 3.1 3 0.2
09-05-79
03-18-80
Well #2 15091A 05-22-79 3.8 12 2.4
08-24-79 .
Well *13, 14, 15 & 16 15092A 05-22-79 3.0 Nil 0.3
03-24-79
01-28-80
Finished 15103A 05-30-79 4.7 20 2.5
09-28-79
03-04-80
07-09-80
Finished 15159A 06-11-79 2.0 11 0.3
10-10-79
01-14-80 '
05-05-80
228Ra
<0.6
1.2
<0.5
<0.6
0.8
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Rhodes . Marshall
Farley Dubuque
Cedar Co. Care Cedar
Facility
Osage Mitchell
St. Olaf Clayton
Prescott ' Adams
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL £ DATE SAMPLED ALPHA
Well n, 300' 15185A 06-12-79 1
09-17-79
12-18-79
07-22-80
Well n, 1230' 15201A 06-11-79 - 6.3
09-11-79
12-13-79
03-12-80
Finished 15202A 06-12-79 5.4
11-19-79
02-08-80
05-13-80
Well #5, 710' 15203A 06-12-79 3.2
09-17-79
12-12-79
04-24-80
Well si 2. 380' 15225A 06-18-79 . 4.7
08-13-79
10-09-79
05-07-80
Well n, 45' 15228A 06-18-79 3.1
09-17-79
12-13-79
03-25-80
pCi/1
BETA 226Ra 22?Ra
Nil
11 2.3 1.1
Nil 1.1 <0.6
2 0.5
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN
COUNTY
IDENTIFICATION
MINERAL ?
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA
pCi/1
BETA 22GRa
Scotch Grove
Manning
Jones
Carroll
Well ?' U.S. 1-, 357' 15236A
Finished
15240A
06-18-79
09-17-79
12-17-79
07-28-80
06-18-79
09-24-79
01-08-80
0.2
5.2
Nil
Nil <0.2
<0.6
^ McBride Cottage Johnson
0 Reserve
Cedar Falls Grundy
Beaver Boone
Slater Story
Finished
Well 270'
Well #1, 100'
Well =3, 223'
15253A
15255A
15261A
15273A
06-19-79
09-18-79
12-26-79
03-11-80
06-19-79
10-02-79
01-29-80
04-08-80
06-19-79
09-25-79
01-29-80
03-25-80
06-18-79
09-25-79
01-02-80
04-08-80
2.1
2.5
3.2
2.9
4 <0.2
0.2
0.7
0.5
<0.6
1.3
= 0.6
= 0.6
-------
PO
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA-SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN
KimbaTI ton
Ricketts
Lansing
Dayton
Wiota
_
Keokuk
pCi/1
COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 226Ra 228Ra
Audubon Well #5, 40' ' 15277A 06-18-79 1.2 1
10-02-79
12-18-79
07-30-80
Crawford Well #2, 30' 15284A 06-19-79 3.5 8 0.4 1.4
09-18-79
12-12-79
03-19-80
Allamakee Well 80' . 15287A 2.5 Nil <0.2 <0.b
09-13-79
02-11-80 ":
06-09-80
C -1
Webster Well «f3, 1250' 15289A 06-25-79 5.4 13 <0.2 0.9
09-10-79
12-10-79
04-01-80
Cass Well 147' 15290A 06-25-79 2.1 3 0.3 <0.6
11-29-79
02-18-80
04-18-80
Lee Well 213' 15305A 06-26-79 2.4 3 1.6 <0.6
09-10-79
03-31-80
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August .1980
TOWN COUNTY
Keokuk Lee
Dubuque Dubuque
Dubuque Dubuque
Dallas Marion
Twin Valley Lakes Johnson
Spillville Winneshiek
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
Finished 15312A
09-13-79
12-11-79
Well 400' 15333A 07-02-79 '
07-22-79
02-18-80
04-07-80
06-23-80
Well #1, 296' 15334A 07-02-79
10-08-79
01-29-80
05-06-80
Well #1, 2400' 15341A 07-09-79
10-01-79
01-07-80
03-03-80
Finished 15348A 07-09-79
10-22-79
01-10-80
04-25-80
Finished 15360A 07-10-79
10-30-79
05-12-80
07-15-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 22SRa 223Ra
2.2 2 1.5 1.1
1.8 Nil
2.1 2 2.0 <0.6
4.9 15 2.8 1.1-
3.1 2 <0.1 <0.5
0.3 Nil
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
pCi/1
TOWN COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA
Fort Dodge Webster Well #1&2, 430' 15367A 07-16-79 3.7
11-30-79
01-02-80
03-24-80
Rockwell City Calhoun Finished 15369A 07-17-79 10.2
10-28-79
01- -80
04-01-80
_, Lockridge Jefferson Well #2, 1100' 15391A 07-30-79 19.9
ro
00 02-25-80
06-13-80
Lawton Woodbury Finished 15413A 07-24-79 3.4
10- -79
04-01-80
Coralville Lake ' Johnson Well ,fl&2, 180', 240' 15428A 08-13-79 5.5
Manor 11-26-79
02-12-80
05-12-80
Newell Buena Vista Well #4, 293' 15431A 04-14-79 4
11-14-79
03-12-80
06-16-80
BETA 226Ra 22&F
13 2.8 <0.6
17 1.3 <0.6
23 11.3 2.5'
12 3.3 2.1
5 1.6 <1.6
2 0.4 <0.6
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Benton Co. Care Benton
Facility
Valley Hill Court Dubuque
Holiday Lake Water Poweshiek
System, L.T.D.
Clermont Fayette
Rock Valley Sioux
Goodell Hancock
Blockton Taylor
pCi/1
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 226Ra
Well 400' 15433A 08-14-79 1.5 16
12-11-79
04-15-80
07-08-80
Well 286' .15444A 08-21-79 3.9 Nil 1.8
11-20-79
02-18-80
05-27-80
Well #1, 429' 15527A 09-30-79 2.0 6 <0.2
#2, 412' 12-17-79
04-07-80
06-24-80
Well ?2, 240' 15523A 10-01-79 0.9 3
01-08-80
04-01-80
07-07-80
Well #4, 70' 15539A 10-08-79 1.1 3
01-07-80
04-07-30
07-14-80
Well #1, 190' 15544A 10-09-79 0.6 Nil
01-14-80
05-13-80
07-15-80
Finished 15545A 10-09-79 1.1 3
01-28-80
- 04-07-80
07-07-80
22eRa
0.8
<0.6
-------
Table 43 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for August 1980
TOWN
COUNTY
IDENTIFICATION
MINERAL ?
DATE SAMPLED
ALPHA
pCi/1
BETA 226Ra
225R,
Ellsworth
Northwood
__ Kings ley
ro
CJl
Rake
Baldwin
Ogden
Hami1 ton
Worth
Plymouth
Winneshiek
Jackson
Boone
Well #3, 365'
Well #2, 160'
Well #2&3, 37'
Well #1, 155'
Well n, UNK
Finished
15571A
15560A
15580A
15581A
15583A
15612A
10-16-79
01-14-80
04-08-80
07-14-80
10-15-79
01-07-80
04-15-80
07-10-80
10-22-79
01-21-80
04-21-80
07-21-80
10-22-79
01-21-80
04-21-80
07-21-80
10-23-79
01-07-80
04-14-80
07-15-80
10-30-79
01-28-80
04-28-80
07-28-80
2.2
1.6
1.0
0.3
Nil
.1
0.4
<0.6
-------
Table 44
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for September 1980
pCi/1
TOWN
Badger
South Engl ish
Blue Grass
Van Home
Lansing
_, Blairsburg
ro
°" Panama MWS
Delaware
Dayton
Farnhamville
Mechanicsvil 1 e
Dakota S.S.
Anthon
Columbus Jet.
Battle Creek
01 in
COUNTY
Webster
Keokuk
Iowa
Benton
Allamakee
Hamil ton
Shelby
Delaware
Webster
Calhoun
Cedar
U.S.G.S.
Woodbury
Louisa
Ida
Jones
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Wei 1
Well
Well
Well
rf3, Raw
#4, 330'
#2, 640'
n, 1370'
#2, 805'
#1, 350'
#1, 39'
#1, 335'
ff2, 1240'
n, 776'
T?3, 455'
fD-43, 681' FEE
j?4, 160'
#2, 75'
X *5
fl J
#2, 170'
MINERAL #
15656
15663
15671
15674
15676
15701
15703
15714
15783
15798
15800
16366
16372
16373
16376
16397
DATE SAMPLED
11-15-79
11-29-79
12-06-79
12-10-79
12-10-79
12-19-79
12-20-79
12-26-79
01-21-30
01-22-80
01-24-30
07-10-80
07-10-80
07-14-80
07-10-80
07-21-80
ALPHA
6.0
11
. 3.8
10.7
3.0 .
10.0
8.4
3.0
13.0
6.9
3.0
5.6
2.5
1.1
1.4
0.2
BETA
3
13
5
7
8
Nil
Nil
4
6
4
3
31
12
Nil
2
3
225Ra 228Ra
1.1
2.3
1.2
3.6
2.8
1.0
0.6
0.8
3.1
1.7
0.6
3.4 5.7
-------
Table 44 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Date for September 1980
TOWN
01 in
Onslow
Kings ley
Bronson
A! den
Moorland
Decorah
Decorah
Decorah
Decorah
Decorah
Decorah
Li vermore
Oxford Junction
Farmersburg
Westfield
Jackson Co. Care
COUNTY
Jones
Jones
Plymouth
Woodbury
Hard in
Webster
Winneshiek
Winneshiek
Winneshiek
Winneshiek
Winneshiek
Winneshiek
Humboldt
Jones
Clayton
Plymouth
Jackson
IDENTIFICATION
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
Wei
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
n.
#1,
#3,
*1,
#2,
#2
#1,
#2,
#3,
*5,
*6,
=7 ,
#3,
n,
si,
#1,
#3,
180'
275'
41'
229'
350''
60'
60'
60'
72'
78'
70'
227'
30'
705'
41'
600' FEE
MINERAL #
16398
16399
. 16406
16408
16413
16415
16416
16417
16418
15419
16420
16421
16423
16426
16428
16444
16446
DATE SAMPLED
07-21-80
07-21-80
07-21-80
07-21-80
07-23-80
07-23-80
07-22-80
07-22-80
07-22-80
07-22-30
07-22-80
07-22-80
07-24-80
07-24-80
07-24-80
07-24-80
07-28-80
ALPHA
0
. 0
.0
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
1
.8
.4
.8
.1
.4
.5
.7
.4
.3
.8
.5
.4
.1
.8
.2
.6
.4
pCi/1
BETA. ?26Ra 228Ra
1
Nil
2
6
Nil
11
5
1
1
1
7
4
5
Nil
6
9
4
Fac
ility
-------
Table 44 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, .IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Date for September 1980
TOWN
Hartley
Gladbrook
Gladbrook
Gladbrook
Garnevilla
i Garnevil la
ro
oo
Hubbard
Hubbard
Hospers
Winslow Drill ing
Apl ington
Aplington
New Virginia
Elk Horn
Woodburn
Radcliffe
Univ. I A Oakdale
COUNTY
O'Brien
Tama
Tama
Tama
Clayton
Clayton
Hardin
Hardin
Sioux
Lee
Butler-
Butler
Warren
Shelby
Clarke
Hardin
Johnson
IDENTIFICATION
Well
Well
. Wei 1
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Wei 1
Well
#4, 600'
?4, 45'
#5, 52'
#3, 52'
#4, 840'
i?2, 810'
til. Raw
?2, Raw
510' FEE
1765' FEE
32, 112'
ff3, 270'
54
jf9, 42'
srl
fi>3, 365'
1756'
MINERAL H
164.19
16452
16453
16455
16456
16457
16458
16460
16561
16462
16463
16464
16465
16468
15473
16475
16476
DATE SAMPLED
07-29-80
07-31-80
07-31-80
07-31-80
07-31-80
07-31-80
07-31-80
07-31-80
07-30-30
07-30-80
07-31-80
07-31-80
08- 05 -BO (
08-05-80
08-05-30
08-07-80
08-07-80
ALPHA
6.4
1.6
1.9
1.2
1.1
2.2
0.9
2.0
7.1
30
1.7
0.9
G.2
0.5
2.8
2.3
1.6
pCi/1
BETA 226Ra 22SRa
17 0.4 1.8
5
4
2
3
1
3
2
9 3.5 7.0
7 10.5 2.6
6
6
Nil
4
- Nil
Nil -.
4
Campus
-------
Table 44 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for September 1980
TOWN
Univ. la. Oakdale
Campus
Steamboat Rock
Dakota S.S.
Whiting MWS
Whiting
- Mapleton
Ma pel ton
Marquette
McGregor
Creston
Cedar Fa lls-
Winthrop
Winthrop
Winthrop
Lorimor
Afton
COUNTY
Johnson
Hardin
U.S.G.S. & IGS
Monona
Monona
Monona
Monona
Clayton
Clayton
Union
Black Hawk
Buchanan
Buchanan
Buchanan
Union
Union
IDENTIFICATION
Well 1137'
Well #2, 150'
Well #D-45, 700' FEE
Well #2, 1111
Well #3, 94'
Well #3, 78'
Well #5, 681'
Well 442'
Well s*6, 116'
Well 12' under surface
of lake
Well #19, 200' FEE
Well HI, Raw
Well ?2, Raw
Well #3, 290'
Well #1, 30'
Impoundment
MINERAL .#
16477
16480
16482
16483
16484
16487
16488
16490
16491
16492
16493
16495
16496
16497
16501
16502
DATE SAMPLED
08-07-80
08-08-80
08-12-80
08-12-80
08-12-80
08-12-80
08-14-80
08-14-80
08-14-80
08-14-80
08-19-80
08-19-80
08-19-80
08-22-80
08-22-80
ALPHA
2.4
1.8
7.6
2.2
0.4 -
2.4
2.7
2.6
H:L
0.9
Nil
0.8
1.1
0.7
1.6
0.5
pCi/1
BETA 2?6Ra 228Ra
3
3
20 1.3 \ 0.8
9
16
8
8
2
1
6
3
5
3
6
Nil -.
4
-------
TOWN
What Cheer
Diagonal
Diagonal
Mount Ayr
Dakota S.S.
Table 44 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DEQ MINERAL SAMPLES
Data for September 1980 --
pCi/1
COUNTY IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 226Ra 228Ra
Keokuk Well East, 258' FEE 16503 08- -80 4.6 21 1.4 0.6
Ringgold Well #4, 53' 16505 08-27-80 0.7 2 "I
Ringgold Well #5, 56' 16506 08-27-80 1.9 5
Ringgold Surface water supply 16507 08-27-80 1.5 6
IGS & USGS Well #D-44, 682' FEE La4-tfC38S 07-18-80 8.7 16 2.6 5.9
CJ
o
-------
Table 45
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for September 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Randall. Hamilton
Andrew Jackson
Madrid Boone
Cedar Rapids Linn
Holstein Ida
Sun Valley Ringgold
Water District
pCi/1
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL £ DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 6Ra 2?-8Ra
Well #1, 347' . 148S6A- 03-26-79 6.4 9 4.S <0.6
07-11-79
10-08-79
08-28-80
Well #2, 1235' 15007A 05-01-79 2.4 9 2.0 2.2
02-13-80
07-29-80
Well #1, 91' 15039A 05-08-79 8.6 6 <0.2 1.7
12-03-79
04-01-80
08-25-80
Finished 15045B 04-28-79 9.9 Nil <0.2 <0.5
07-23-79
10-01-79
08-09-80
Well n, 644' 15100A 05-29-79 3.2 Nil 0.4 <0.6
11-26-79
02-04-80
07-21-80 __
Finished 15157B 06-11-79 0.1 5
09-04-79
12-02-79
-------
Table 45 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for September 1980
TOWN COUNTY
West Point Lee
Oxford Junction Jones
Bettendorf Scott
Alden Hard in
Garner Hancock
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
Well #3, 1900' 15204A 06-12-79
09-17-79
12-03-79
07-30-80
Well #1, 50' 15249A 06-18-79
02-25-80
07-26-80
Finished 15254A 06-19-79
09-17-79
12-17-79
03-17-80
Well #2, 350' 15262A
09-24-79
12-17-79
03-31-80
Finished 15279A 06-18-79
11-27-79
08-11-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 226Ra 228Ra
10 16 7K 1.5
4.0 3 0.7 0.7
8.6 3 1.7 1.4
4.4 4 1.2 2.0
2.1 4 1.0 0.6
Dubuque
Dubuque
Well 475'
15292A
3.2 5
1.7 2.0
02-14-80
-------
Table 45 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for September 1980
TOWN . COUNTY
Diagonal Ringgold
Dysart Tama
Long Grove Scott
Bremer Co. Bremer
Care Facility
Lincoln Tama
Prairie View Black Hawk
Acres
pCi/1
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL S DATE SAMPLED ALPHA BETA 226Ra 223Ra
Finished 15296A 06-25-79 1.6 2
10-24-79
01-28-80
08-11-80
Well East, 1850' 15335A 07-02-79 3.4 13 3.3 1.8
10-29-79
02-11-80 V
08-04-80
Finished 15359A 07-09-79 1.0 1
10-23-79
02-01-80
09-05-80
Well #1, 200' 15376A 07-17-79 1.6 2
11-26-79
05-12-80
08-11-80
Well SI, 515' 15388A 07-30-79 2.8 Nil 1.2 0.9
11-05-79
05-12-80
08-11-80
Well rfl, Deep 15394A 07-23-79 1.2 Nil
10-22-79
01-21-80
08-18-80
-------
Table 45 (Continued)
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for September 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Cresco Howard
(Howard Co. Care
Facil i ty)
Muscatine Muscatine
(Manjoine Sub-
division)
Akron Plymouth
Charter Oak Crawford
Braddyville Page
Humboldt Humboldt
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
Well 250' 15443A 08-20-79
11-26-79
07-14-80
03-03-80
Finished 15497A
02-22-80
05-19-80
08-18-80
Well #4, 54' 15563A 10-12-79
01-14-80
04-07-80
07-23-80
Finished 15582A 10-22-79
01-21-80
04-23-80
07-21-80
Finished 15667A 12-03-79
03-04-80
06-02-80
09-02-80
Well #3-73, 150' 15668A 12-04-79
03-03-80
06-02-80
09-03-80
pCi/1
ALPHA BETA 226Ra 228Ra
7.7 Nil <0.2 <0.6
' 1.7 Nil
2.2 4 <0.2 1.7
2.0 Nil <0.2 <0.6
1.0 Nil
1.8 Nil
-------
. Table 46
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
IOWA CITY, IOWA
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SDWA SAMPLES
Data for September 1980
TOWN COUNTY
Odebolt Sac
IDENTIFICATION MINERAL # DATE SAMPLED
Well #8, 2131' 15194A 06-11-79
09-11-79
12-17-79
03-31-80
90Sr (pCi/1)
<0.45
CO
in
-------
SDWA samples - September 1980
90Sr
DATA - INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES
Radiation Protection Division
Department of_ National Health and Welfare
Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Program
The Radiation Protection Bureau of the Canadian Department of National
Health and Welfare monitors surface air and precipitation in connection with its
Radioactive Fallout Study Program. Twenty-four collection stations are located
at airports where the sampling equipment is operated by personnel from the
Atmospheric Environment Service of the Department of the Environment. Detailed
discussions of the sampling procedures, methods of analysis, and interpretation
of results of the radioactive fallout program are contained in reports of the
Department of National Health and Welfare.
A summary of the sampling procedures and methods of analysis was presented
in the May 1969 Issue of Radiological Health Data and_ Reports^
The most recently reported data from this program were published in the
December 1974 issue of Radiation Data and Reports.
This section will be discontinued in future ERD Reports unless there are
some data to publish.
136
-------
Institute Nacional de Energia Nuclear
Mexico, D.F^
Mexican Air Monitoring Program
The Institute Nacional de Energia Nuclear from Mexico with the assistance of
several institutions maintains sampling stations at Ensenada, B.C.; Merida,
Yuc.; 'Torreon, Coah.; Chihuahua, Chih.; and Veracruz, Ver.
Airborne particles are collected by 48-hour sampling through
glass-fiber-filter paper, using a High Volume Sampler.
Air volumes are calculated by using a flowmeter and a timer. About 2000
m of air are sampled on each Filter.
All samples are sent to the Departamento de Radiactividad Ambiental, in
Mexico, D. F., where Filters are analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 72 hours
after collection. Gamma spectroscopy and strontium-90 analyses are performed on
samples at least two orders of magnitude higher than average.
A monthly summary of gross beta radioactivity for June - December 1977 was
1 reported in ERD 16.
This section will be discontinued in future ERD Reports unless there are
some data to publish.
137
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION DATA (ERD) is published quarterly (January, April,
July, October) by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's office of
Radiation Programs.
Requests for information concerning publication and distribution of ERD
should be directed to:
Charles M. Petko
Technical Services Branch
Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility
P. 0. Box 3009
Montgomery, Alabama 36193
Requests for information concerning the operation of ERAMS should be
directed to:
H. Michael Mardis, Chief
Monitoring and Analytical Services Branch
Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility
P. 0. Box 3009
Montgomery, Alabama 36193
or to:
Raymond H. Johnson, Chief
Ionizing Radiation Surveillance Branch
Office of Radiation Programs, (ANR-461)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Waterside Mall East
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
***
------- |