PB-239 778
SONOMA COUNTY SOLID WASTE STABILIZA
TION STUDY
EMCON Associates
Prepared for:


Environmental Protection Agency



1975
                    DISTRIBUTED BY:
                    KTDl
                    National Technical Information Service
                    U. S. DEPARTMENT 05 COMMERCE

-------
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
SHEET
                    1. Reort No.
                            530SW65D1

                         PB   239   778
4. Title and Subtitle

    Sonoma County Solid Waste  Stabilization Study
                           5. Report Date
                               1975
                                                                   6.
7. Author(s)
    EMCON  Associates
                           8. Performing Organization Rept.
                             No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
    EMCON Associates
    326 Commercial Street
    San ijose, California
                           10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
                           11. Contract/Grant No.
                              G06-EC-00351
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
    Environmental  Protection Agency
    Office of Solid  Waste Management Programs
    Washington, D. C.   20460
                           13. Type ofNReport & Period
                              Covered
                               Final   '
                           14.
15. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstracts
    This report documents  all  three years of  a  three-year demonstration
    project sponsored  by  EPA and Sonoma County, California.  ,The purpose
    of the project was  twofold:  (1) to investigate the stabilization
    of solid waste in  a sanitary landfill by  analyzing leachate, gas,
    temperature and  settlement parameters, and  (2)  to determine the
    effect on solid  waste  stablization of applying, under various opera-
    tional modes, excess water, septic tank pumpings, and recycled
    leachate 1n a sanitary landfill.  This report describes the invest^
    gation of the test  site, construction, instrumentation, and site
    operations and discusses the data produced  with some conclusions
    based on extensive  monitoring.  Tables and  figures following this
    report summarize the detailed data presented in the appendices.
17. Key Words and Document Analysis.  17o. Descriptors
    Landfill, Leachate,  Septic Tank, Water
17b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms


    Test Cell, Solid  Waste
                                             P&CES SUWECT TO CHAMGE
NATIONAL TECHNICAL
INFOw!^N.SHSYICE
17c. COSATI Field/Group
18. Availability Statement
 ->RM NTis-35 (REV. 10-73)  ENDORSED BY ANSI AND UNESCO.
                19.. Security Class (This    121. No. of Pages
                   Report)             I    y^L^L
                     UNCLASSIFIED     I-   A-°->
                20. Security (     ^EPALBIWffiOT 10MATERIW-S
                                                            "
          THIS FORM MAY BE R^
                                                                       RXDOQDlbSbl

-------
                NOTICE





THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED  FROM  THE



BEST COPY  FURNISHED US BY THE SPONSORING



AGENCY.  ALTHOUGH  IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CER-



TAIN PORTIONS ARE  ILLEGIBLE,  IT IS BEING RE-



LEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE



AS MUCH  INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE.

-------
                              0 6527S
            SONOMA COUNTY  SOLID WASTE STABILIZATION STUDY
        This final  report  (SW-65d.l) describes work performed
        for the Federal  solid waste management programs under
demonstration grant project G06-EC-00351 to Sonoma County^  California
                   was written by EMCON ASSOCIATES
           and, is  reproduced as received from the grantee
               U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                                1975

-------
This report as submitted by the grantee or contractor has not been
technically reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Publication does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of EPA, nor does mention of commercial products
constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government.

An environmental protection publication (SW-65d,l) in the solid waste
management series.
                                 n

-------
                     TABLE OF  CONTENTS
 II..

 III.

 IV.

 V.

"VI .

-VII.

 VI I I
 IX.
TABLES
 FlCURES
 PREFACE

 INTRODUCTION

 GEOTECHNICAL  INVESTIGATION

 PROJECT  CONSTRUCTION

 INSTRUMENTATION

 REFUSE  COMPOSITIONAL  ANALYSIS

 OPERATIONS  AND MANAGEMENT

 MONITORING  PROGRAM

 DISCUSSION

     REFUSE  STABILIZATION  AND LEACHATE COMPOSITION

     SAMPLING  AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

     TEST CELLS:  TREATMENT,  PURPOSE AND RESULTS

     GROUNDWATER QUALITY

     GENERAL SUMMARY OF REFUSE  STABILIZATION

     CONCLUSIONS

     RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY

 REFERENCES
                      v
                      1

                      3
                      7

                      13
                      \k
                      17
                      19
                      22

                      22
                      28
                                                               50
                                                               51
                                                               56

                                                               57
 1.
 2.
 3.
 k.
 5.
 6.
 7.
 8.
 9.
10.
1 1 .
12,
13.
H».
15.

 1 .
 2,
 3.
 A.
 5.
 6.
 7.
                                                               Rat Ios
                                                               Rat i os
Liquid Conditioning and Purpose of Cells
Summary of Typical Ranges of Various Leachate Components
Refuse Moisture Content Summary
Refuse Composition Summary
Composition of Refuse
Cell  C Leachate - EIectro-ConductivIty/Paramotfir
Cell  D Leachate - Electro-Conductivity/Parameter
Companion Thermistor Comparison
Leachate Laboratory Studies
Leachate Field Studies
Solution Analysis
Weight, Density, Moisture
Trace Metal Concentration
Trace Meta1 Concentrat I on
Trace Metal Concentration
                                        Data of Test
                                        in  Leachate,
                                        in  Leachate,
                                        in  Leachate,
           Cell  Refuse
           CelIs A,B,E
           Cel 1  C
           Cel 1  D
              Location  Map
              Geolog i c  Map
              Exploration  Map
              Field  Density  Test  Location
              Site  Plan  (as  bui1t)
              Section A-A,  Site  Plan
              Sect!on B-B,  S i te  PI an
Map

-------
FIGURES (cont'd)
8.
9.
10.
1 1 .
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
2k.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.

32.
33.
34.

35.
36.
37.
38.
39,
40.
41.
C lay Ba
Typ i cal
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Col 1e
F uid R
Fluid R
Plot of
Cel 1
P ot of
P ot of
P ot of
P ot of
P ot of
Plot of
Sett lem
APPENDICES

        A.

        B.

        C.

      .  D.

        E.

        F.

        G.

        H.
                                                     A-E
                                                     - Cel
                                                     Cel Is
                                               s A-E
                                               A-E
  Instrumentation Location Plan
  Alkalinity vs.  Time - Cells A-E
  Volatile Acids  vs.  Time - Cells
  B.O.D.  vs. Time - Cel Is A-E
  C.O.D.  vs. Time - Cells A-E
  Total  Dissolved Solids vs.  Time
  Electro-Conductivity vs. Time -
  Chloride vs.  Time - Cells A-E
  Sulphate vs.  Time - Cells A-E
  Phosphate vs.  Time  - Cells  A-E
  Nitrate vs.  Time -  Cells A-E
  Nitrogen-Ammonia vs. Time - Cells A-E
  Nitrogen-Organic vs. Time - Cells A-E
  Sodium vs. Time - Cells A-E
  Potassium vs.  Time  - Cells  A-E
  Calcium vs.  Time -  Cells A-E
  Magnesium vs.  Time  - Cells  A-E
  pH vs.  Time -  Cells A-E
  Iron  vs. Time  - Cells A-E
  Fecal  Coliform vs.  Time - Cells A-E
  Fecal  Streptococci  vs. Time - Cells A-E
  Cumulative Leachate Production - Cells A,B,
  Cumulative Water Distribution S Leachate
  tion-Cell C
Rout ing  - Cel 1  C
Routing  - Cell  D
  Temperature vs
 ;  A-E
  Tempe rature
  Temperature
  Temperature
  Tempe rature
  Tempe rat u re
  Gas Compos i t i on
 -.nt -  Cel 1 s A-E
Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing
Test Cell Construction Data

Clay Barrier Construction Data

Instrumentation Detail Drawings
Refuse Compositional Data

Monitoring Schedules

Analytical Methods and Procedures

Mon i tored Data
Test Cell Refuse Placement History
                                                                  &  E
                                     Time - Middle Thermistor
vs .
vs .
vs .
vs .
vs .
i on
Ti
Ti
Ti
Ti
Ti
vs
me
me
me
me
me
,
- Al 1
- Al 1
- Al 1
- Al 1
- Al 1
Time -
The
The
The
The
The
Cel
rm
rm
rm
rm
rm
Is
s
s
s
s
s
A
to
to
to
to
to
-E
rs ,
rs ,
rs ,
rs ,
rs ,

Ce
Ce
Ce
Ce
Ce

1
1
1
1
1

A
B
E
C
D

                                IV

-------
                             PREFACE

     Sanitary landfilling involves (l)  the placement of refuse in
a manner which wMI not degrade -the 1and-water-atr environment of
the disposal site, (2) the compaction  of the refuse to the smallest
practical volume,  (3)  the daily covering of the refuse wfth a
layer of earth and (4) the performance  of disposal  operations
without creating nuisances or hazards  to the health and safety
of the surrounding community.
     Once disposed of in a sanitary landfill, the  refuse presents
a potential  source of pollutfon for a  period of 10's to 100's of
years.  The introduction of large quantities of water into the
sanitary fill either by acts of nature  such as floods and  rising
groundwater or by negligence of man through inadequate grading,
drainage, or maintenance of the earth  cover can release pollutants
from the decomposing refuse to contaminate the groundwater and
surface waters„
     The study discussed in thi's report was conceived to test the
hypothesis that stab 11 iza't Ton of refuse in a sanitary landfill can
be accelerated by the controlled application of water thereby
reducing the period of time during which the landfill presents a
potential source of pollution and the  risk that such pollution
might occur.
     The stabilization of household refuse in a sanitary landfill
is being investigated in five large-scale field test cells.  The
refuse in the test cells is subjected  to various moisture  conditions
and mediums through the controlled application of  excess water,
septic tank pump ings and recycled leachate.  The stabilization
of the refuse is measured by monitoring and analysis of leachate,
gas, temperature and settlement of the  sanitary landfill.   In
 addition,  the groundwater in the vicinity of the  test  cells  is
 tested periodically to  detect any s i gn i f i can t  change of quality,,

-------
     This study is funded principally by the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency under Demonstration Grant No. G06-EC-00351 of the
EPA Office of Solid Waste Management Programs.  Partial  funding
of the 3 year demonstration project is provided by the County of
Sonoma, Project Sponsor.

                      P'ro'J'e'c't. Ma n ageraen t

     Mr. Donald B. Head, Director of Public Works, County of
Sonoma is Project Director.  All project activities are  directly
supervised by the Assistant Director of Public Works for Sonoma
County, Mr. Duane Butler.  Project Engineer assisting Mr. Butler
is Mr. Johnny Conaway.
     Emcon Associates,  Consultants in Waste Management,  provides
technical direction and  input to the project, as well as the
laboratory testing and analysis.  Their services are under the
direction of Project Manager, Mr. John G. Pacey.  Dr. James Leckie
of Stanford University provides bfological-cheraica1 consulting
expertise through Emcon Associates.

                     Ac know 1 'e'd'g'nie'n11 s

     Among those who contributed significantly to the study were
the staff of the Environmental Protection Agency in Cincinnati,
Ohio; the State of California Department of Public Health; the
State of California Department of Water Resources; the County of
Sonoma Sanitation Department  ; and students of Sonoma State College
and Santa Rosa Community College.
                                Vl

-------
                       I  - INTRODUCTION

     The investigation which forms the subject of this report was
authorized under a three-year demonstrat ton grant project sponsored
by EPA and the County of  Sonoma, California.   The purpose of the
project is twofold:
     i.  To investigate the stabilization of refuse in a sanitary
         landfill  by analyzing leachate, gas, temperature and
         settlement parameters.
     2.  To determine the effect on refuse stabilization of applying,
         under various operational modes, excess water, septic
         tank pump ings and recycled leachate to a sanitary landfill.
     The stabilization of refuse is monitored in five instrumented
field scale test  cells.   Each test cell is subjected to a
different controlled moisture condition and/or liquid character.
The liquid conditioning and purpose of each cell are set forth in
Table 1.
     This report documents the site investigation, construction,
instrumentation and site  operations and presents and discusses
data generated during the three-year demonstration grant project.
     The work was  conducted jointly by the staffs of Sonoma County
Department of Public Works and Emcon Associates, the County's
consultant, and includes  the following:
     1.  Geotechnjcal investigation of test site.
     2.  Construction and instrumentation of clay barrier.
     3.  Design and construction of five field scale refuse test
         cells and various monitoring instruments and facilities
         for distribution, collection and storage of leachate and
         water added to,  or withdrawn from the test cells.
     A.  Compositional analysis  of refuse placed in the test cells.

-------
     5.  Monitoring of refuse stabilization parameters, including
         leachate and gas composition, temperature and settlement.
     6.  Monitoring of selected groundwater parameters to
         determine the effect of the project on the quality of
         the groundwater.
     7.  Development of leachate and gas sampling and analytical
         p rocedures.
     During the first six months of the study, the geotechnica1
investigation of the test cell area was accomplished, the test cells
were constructed, refuse placed, and the cells were covered.   From
that time data has been collected on a scheduled basis concerning
refuse settlement, cell temperatures, gas composition and leachate
composition, as well  as external parameters concerning groundwater
quality.   Mean temperature, rainfall, evaporation, storm runoff
and quantity of liquid added to and withdrawn from each test  cell
are also monitored.
     Discussion presented tn this report follows the sequence in
which the activities occured, namely the first portions of the
report describe the geotechnical investigation and construction
activities followed by a discussion of instrumentation, composi-
tional analysis of the refuse, pertinent operations and manage-
ment procedures and th-e monitoring program.  The main thrust  of
this report is a discussion of refuse stabilization as measured
by extensive monitored data.  Tables and figures following the
text of this report summarize the detailed data presented in  the
appendi ces.
     Readers wishing to examine closely the quantitative data will
find this information in the appendices following the main body
of this repo rt„

-------
         II - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION - TEST CELL AREA
Scope of Work
     The initial work element for the demonstration grant was a
geotechnical investigation of the test cell area located within
the Central Disposal Site Fn Sonoma County, California.  The pur-
pose of the investigation was (1) to determine the material types
and conditions underlying the test cell area, (2) to determine the
suitability of the site for the proposed use, and (3) to prepare
appropriate recommendations concerning the geotechnical aspects
of the research program.
     The scope of work completed in this investigation included
a surface and subsurface investigation, a review of geologic and
engineering data, laboratory testing of selected soil samples to
determine the pertinent physical and mechanical  properties of
the foundation materials, and the evaluation of this data to
determine the suitability of the area for the intended program.

Site Desc r i pt ion
     The Central Disposal Site  is located.in the southwestern
portion of Sonoma County, approximately ^5 road miles north of
San Francisco, California.   (See Figure 1)   The site consists of
approximately *»00 acres of sparsely-wooded grazing land in the well
rounded foothills of the Northern Coast Range.  It is located well
away from the path of urbanization, within a relatively short
travel distance of central  service areas.   An improved all-weather
road leads to the large central  canyon.  This canyon will  provide
capacity for disposal of solid waste generate.d in Sonoma County
well beyond the year 2000.

     An area for the test cells  was selected about midway up the
central canyon in a relatively flat portion of the valley, just
east of the main drainage channel, (see Figure 2.)   A small

-------
tributary drainage channel passes through the test cell area bi-
secting it approximately  in half, with three cells located to the
north and two to the  south of the tributary channel.
     Placement of sanitary ffll at the Central  Disposal Site
commenced in the main canyon just above (north)  the test cell
area.  Landfflling will proceed up the canyon away from the test
cells.  The test cell area should therefore be  available for
uninterrupted research activities for many years to come.

Geology
     The Central Disposal Site is underlain primarily by marine
sediments of the Franciscan Formation, (see Geologic Hap,  figure 2)
These Jura-cretaceous rocks consist of sandy clayey shale with
interbedded sandstones and silicic chert beds.   Geologic structure
in the Franciscan Formation sediments is extremely complex re-
flecting a turbulent history of faulting, folding and shearing.
The trend of this bedrock system is generally northwest-southeast
through the Northern Coast Ranges of California.
     The surface and near-surface deposits within the valley
portions of the site contain relatively thin deposits of poorly-
consolidated sediments of younger Herced Formation.  The Merced
Formation rocks are of P1io-P1eistocene Age and consist essentially
of gravelly sandstones with Fnterbeds of sandy  clay and silt.
The basal portion of the Herced Formation contains a zone of
we 11 -indurated impervious volcanic tuff breccia.  Sediments of the
Merced Formation have been deposited on an old  erosion surface
(valley) of the underlying older Franciscan Formation.  The poorly-
consolidated sediments of the Merced Formation  are relatively
undisturbed as indicated by their near-horizontal attitude and
uninterrupted continuity.
Subsurface Exploration
     Five exploration trenches were excavated in the test cell
«rea in order to examine foundation soil types  and conditions and
thereby determine the most suitable location for the cells from
the standpoint of geology.

-------
The locations of the trenches are shown on Figure 3 and the logs
of soils encountered tn the trenches are presented in Appendix A.
In general, the materials encountered in the excavation were com-
prised of sandy and s? 1 ty clays and clayey sands.  Some gravel
was encountered in each trench and free water was observed in
trench k.

Groundwater
     Sedimentary rocks of the Franciscan formation are considered
to be essentially barren of fresh water.  Locally, however, these
we 1 I-consolidated rock units contain small supplies of poor to
fair quality water which Fs used for domestic and stock water
supply.  The more successful low-yield wells tap water supplies
in deeply-weathered or highly-fractured rock.  These marginal
supplies of poor quality water do not constitute a protectable
resource.  Sediments of the Merced Formation contain groundwater
of moderate to high quality in the more pervious strata.  This
water is contained in beds of sand, lenses of gravels and occasion-
ally in  lenses of permeable volcanic rock.
     Groundwater was encountered In thin beds of clayey sand and
gravel just above the basal tuff breccia In each of the drill
holes in the canyon bottom areas. This aquifer ranged in thickness
from two to ten feet and occurred from 15 to 25 feet below ground
surface.  The groundwater encountered In this formation was
confined by overlying clays of low permeafa11Ity and artesian
pressure heads ranged from ten to nearly twenty feet in explora-
tion drill holes.  Production capacities from wells in this thin
stratum  are estimated to be marginal, but known hydraulic continuity
between  this aquifer and major production aquifers to the south
established the absolute need to prevent pollution of this
aquifer  by harmful materials originating in the refuse fill.
     In  addition to the subsurface groundwater, at least one per-
ennial and two intermittent springs exist in the large canyon
at the upper end of the Central Disposal Site.  The backhoe investi-
gation in the test cell area revealed little groundwater within
twelve feet of the ground surface.

-------
Laboratory Investigation
     Representative soil samples recovered from the exploration
trenches were tested In the laboratory to determine their physical
and mechanical characteristics.   Test data are presented in
Appendix A.  Based on the results of these laboratory tests, it
was concluded that the clay soils possess a permeability of less
than one foot per year and soils excavated for construction of
the test cells can be readily recompacted.

Cone 1 us i ons
     Based on the results of the field and laboratory investiga-
tion,  we determined that the test cell area was suitable for the
research test cells.  It was decided that excavations for
construction of the test cells should terminate within the upper
sandy  clay and clayey sand materials of low permeab?1 Ity.  Applica-
tion of this criteria, tempered by drainage considerations and
evaluation of the cut-and-ftll material balance, resulted in the
siting of the test cells at the locations shown on the plans.
     The native soils in thefr existing state were considered
generally satisfactory for retaining any leachate developed during
excavation of the test cells.   Occasional lenses or layers of
more pervious waterbearing soils were expected in the cell
excavations.   Such areas were to be over-excavated two feet and
an impervious clay lining was to be placed to restore the test
cells  to design grade.  Material generated from excavation of the
cells  was considered suitable for construction of the embankment
portion of the test cells.   The resulting test cells  would thus be
relatively impervious and capable of retaining leachate and
gases„

-------
                   I II-PROJECT CONSTRUCTION

     Project constructton• generally proceeded as originally de-
signed and presented on the drawings which accompanied the demon-
stration grant application.  However, some design modifications
were made during construction to meet changed conditions and re-
flect additional decisions.  Final  construction details are shown
on Figures 5, 6 and 7 "As Built" drawings.

CELL CONSTRUCTION
Excavat i on
     The test cells were excavated to design grade and the material
     /      •         '        •         ••'•''
removed was stockpiled adjacent to the cells.
     Some groundwater was encountered in the excavation of Cells A
and E.   As a consequence, the subsurface drains above Cell A and
E and above Cells B through D were installed prior to construction
of the embankment.
     After excavation to design grade, the ground surface was
inspected to determine the presence of any pervious lenses within
the cell  configuration.  A thin zone of pervious material was
encountered in Cells A and E„  This material was removed by over-
excavating two feet.  This area was then restored to design grade
with a two-foot-thick layer of compacted clay.

Embankment
     The embankment areas of the test cells were first stripped of
all surface organic matter.  The ground surface was then scarified
and compacted.  The stockpiled material from cell excavation was
utilized as embankment fill and was placed in lifts of six inch
uncompacted thickness.  The lifts were moisture conditioned as
necessary to achieve proper compaction and compacted by numerous
passes of a 5 x 5 sheepsfoot compactor drawn by a D-7 tractor and
a Buffalo Springfield steel wheeled compactor.

-------
     Field density tests were taken during the placement operation
to determine the relatfve compaction of the embankment materials.
Results of the field densfty tests and laboratory control  curves
are presented in Appendix B.  Field density measurements were
made at the locations shown in figure 4.
     When the downhill  embankment had been constructed to a level
two feet above the floor of the cell, trenches for the leachate
collection lines were excavated in the bottom of the cell  and a
trench was excavated through the embankment for the leachate line
discharging to the collection tank.  Leachate collection lines
were placed in the trenches and backfilled.  The trench through
the embankment was backfilled wfth a combination of native soil
and 10% bentonite, by weight, in order to assure an impervious
backfill.  The embankments were then rafsed to design grade.  ''A
shallow trench was excavated on the inside slope from the top
of the embankment to the base of the cell for installation of
the lysimeter and gas collection lines.

Leachate Collection System

     After the cells were excavated and graded and the embankments
had been constructed to an elevation two feet above the base of
the cells, trenches were excavated in the base of the cells and
through the embankments for placement of the leachate collection
lines.  Pea gravel was placed around the collection lines in Cell
C and D.
     All collection tanks were positioned below the test cells
with the top of tank below the base of the test cells, thereby
assuring positive drainage of leachate into the collection facilities
     In Cells A and E single leachate collection line was installed
across the lower (west) side of the base as only a small quantity
of leachate was expected.  A full system of leachate collection
lines was installed in Cells B through D to collect the large

-------
quantities of leachate expected from these cells.   Cell  B was
expected to develop a considerable quantity of leachate  only during
the initial charging to field capacity.   Nevertheless, the quantity
expected was such that a full collection system was installed.

Granular Materials
     Granular materials were used as backfill  in the leachate
collection trenches and for d ts t r i but ton' material  between the
distribution lines and refuse tn Cell C and D.  Mechanical analyses
of potentially suitable materials were performed prior to cell
construction (See Appendix B).   Concrete sand and muck sand from
Basalt were accepted for the silty sand and concrete sand require-
ments.  Pea gravel was substituted for the proposed fine soil
backfill material on leachate collection lines in Cells C and
D and for material placed between refuse and distribution lines
in Cell D.  This substitution was made to avoid the filtering
action that might occur when leachate passes through fine soil.

Refuse
     Refuse was  initially dumped at the edge of the cell and then
pushed into the  cell and spread by a D-7 dozer.   The dozer
compacted the refuse tn a manner similar to the procedures that
would be used in the normal sanitary landfill  operation*  Detailed
refuse placement history is presented in Appendix 1.
     All incoming refuse was weighed.  Samples  of the refuse were
obtained for compositional  analyses in accordance with accepted
statistical sampling methods.  The samples were hand sorted into
appropriate waste categories in a covered work area within five
miles of the job site.

Cove r Mater i a 1
     Cover material generally consisted of the stockpiled sandy
clay material from cell excavation.   The cover material  was placed
as a two-foot capping over the refuse in Cells A, B and  E.   A

-------
one-foot thickness of permeable material was placed between the
refuse and sandy clay cover in Cell C and D to facilitate distri-
bution of water and leachate.   In Cell C this one-foot of material
consisted of a layer of fine si1ty sand placed directly overlying
the refuse.  A six inch mound of concrete sand was placed around
the liquid distribution lines installed between the si1ty sand and
cover material.  A 12-inch layer of pea gravel (In lieu of si1ty
sand) was placed between the refuse and cover material in Cell
D to minimize any filtration of leachate.
     The sandy clay was spread in one-foot lifts and compacted
by numerous passes of a D-7 dozer.  Two-tnch-diameter holes were
augered through the cell cover at intervals of 10 feet to permit
measurement of the in-place thickness of cover material.   The
cover thickness measurements for all  cells are presented in
Appendix B.

Leachate Distribution System
     As previously mentioned,  a twelve-Inch layer of pea gravel
was placed over the refuse in Cell D fn 1 feu of the originally
planned fine si1ty sand spreading medium.  Elimination of the
spreading medium necessitated further changes in the distribution
system for Cell D to assure.unlform application of recycled leachate
over the refuse.  The changes  consisted of the installation of
two separate leachate distribution systems utilizing eight lines
each with lines more closely spaced than the originally planned
eleven line system.  The decreased total footage in each system
made necessary an increase in  the size of the small discharge
holes to maintain planned distribution rates.  This had the side
benefit of reducing the potential for plugging of the holes by
solids in the leachate.

Clay Barrier Construction
     An impervious clay barrier was constructed across t'he lower
end of the central canyon, below (south) of the test cells and
central disposal areas, to block the  subsurface escape of leachate
and gases which might emanate  from the sanitary landfill  and
test cells.  See Figure 8 for maximum cross section.

-------
     Native sandy clay soils were excavated to bedrock in pre-
paration for construction of the barrier.   Conditions encountered
in the excavation were as originally estimated with the maximum
depth of excavation being 30 to 35 feet below the valley floor
or approximately 20 to 25 feet below the canyon creek channel.
The excavation was inspected by Hr.  Jack HcCollough, the Engineering
Geologist involved in the original investigation of the valley,
and Hr. John Pacey, Consulting Engineer for the construction
phase of the grant project.
     A sump was excavated at the low point of excavation on the
downstream "side of the barrier excavation and backfilled with
granular material.  A perforated pipe was installed in the sump
and extended to the natural  ground surface to permit future removal
of seepage waters collected  in the drainage blanket, if required.
     The barrier was constructed by  backfilling the excavation with
sandy clay soil obtained from the excavation.  The fill material
was spread by a D-8 Caterpillar Tractor in relatively thin lifts
which were moisture conditioned as necessary to permit achievement
of the required relative compaction  and compacted by numerous
passes of a 5 x 5 Sheepsfoot roller  drum pulled by a TD-2*» tractor.
A sand drainage blanket was  placed between the downstream face of
the clay barrier and natural ground.
     A moisture-density curve was developed in our laboratory
to establish relative compaction parameters for the backfill
material in accordance with  ASTH Test Designation D698-70.  Field
density tests were performed periodically during the filling opera-
tion at random locations.  Test methods utilized included both
the sand cone method (ASTH Test Designation D 1556) and the
nuclear density test method  (ASTH Test Designation D2922-71).
The field density test results and laboratory compaction curve are
presented in Appendix C.
     The barrier was constructed up  to a point slightly above the
stream channel elevation under the inspection and testing control
of Hr. James Cleary of Emcon Associates.  County personnel directed
and inspected the placement  of additional fill required to raise
the grade up to the natural  ground surface and to provide an
aesthetically-pleasing finish ground surface.  No tests were

-------
performed on this final  10 feet of fill,  as this  work was  princi
pally for aesthetic purposes.   Nevertheless,  precautions were
taken by County Staff to assure that the  material was properly
moisture conditioned and compacted.
                               12

-------
                       IV - INSTRUMENTATION
     Stabilization of the refuse is monitored by Instruments
installed in the test cells and by testing of leachate and gas
samples withdrawn from the cells at programmed Intervals.
Instrumentation installed for refuse stabilization data retrieval
include gas  probes,  thermistors, settlement monuments and
leachate collection  facilities.
     Evaporation, rainfall and cell runoff data necessary  to
evaluate rainfall infiltration into the test cells, are recorded
respectively by an evaporIraeter, rain gauge and two flow meters.
Additional  flow meters connected at appropriate locations  in the
collection,  discharge and distribution piping, record the  daily
application  of water to Cell  C and makeup water applied to Cell
D, as well  as the quantity of leachate produced by Cells C and D.
     Instrumentation for obtaining groundwater samples and
measuring its quality include observation wells installed  downhill
and uphill  of the test cells  and up-valley of the cla.y barrier,
and lysimeters installed below each test cell.  Groundwater
levels within and beneath the clay barrier are monitored by
pi ezometers.
     Instrument locations and identification symbols used  in
recording data developed are  shown on Figure 9.  Detailed  drawings
of the instruments utilized are presented In Appendix D.
                               13

-------
               V - REFUSE COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS

                                               tp
     The composition and moisture content of refuse placed in
the test cells was determined by analyzing refuse samples selected
                                               i
by statistical sampling methods.  The sampling schedule was
derived by use of Random Sample numbers, as noted and shown on
P1 ate 1, Appendix E.

Sample  . P rocureiaen-t Procedure
                  i
     The weigh master marked the refuse trucks containing refuse to
be sampled as it left the scale.    Trucks marked for sampling
were directed by the traffic dispatcher to deposit Its load of
refuse adjacent to the designated cell.  A front loader scooped
300 or more pounds of refuse at random from this pile and loaded
it into the bed of a pickup truck.   The sample was then enclosed In
a canvas tarp and transported to the sorting center which was
located about 5 miles east In the county road maintenance yard at
Cotati .
            i
     The sample was removed from the truck, placed on a thick
black plastic ground cloth and sorted.  Forty-two part-time
employees, primarily students from Sonoma State College and Santa
Rosa Community College, were employed to sort the refuse samples.
Ten labelled 32-gallon trash cans with plastic liners were
positioned 'around the sample.  Two to six students classified,
segregated and deposited the material in the trash cans.
Approximately 10 man-hours were required to sort a sample.  The
material  was sorted into the fol 1 ow ing"l|>' categor i eS :
I.  Food Waste                          6.,,  Wood
2.  Garden Waste     "-"                  7. .Metal?
3.  Paper                               8.  Glass
k.  Plastics, Rubber, Leather           9.  Ash, Rock, Dirt
5.  Text iles                           10.  Fines

                                 11*

-------
     After the sample was sorted, all cans in each category were
weighed and recorded.  The total weight of waste in each category
is presented on plates 2-6, Appendix E.

Sort ing Gui deli nes
     1.  Synthetic material was classified as a plastic.
     2.  Fines were defined as any material that wpuld pass through
         a 1" sieve.  No further classification was attempted.
     3.  Wood was wood material that had been processed at a mill,
         i.e., a 2xk was classified as wood,  but a tree limb or
         branch was classified as garden waste.
     4.  Food wastes included: bones, shells, feathers, and fecal
         material.  Food wastes were scraped  out of their containers
         and the container deposited into its appropriate category.
     5.  Labels were left on containers.

Moisture Determination
     The samples of segregated refuse were bulky, took a long time
to dry and generated an obnoxious odor while drying.   The small
capacity ovens of the Sonoma County Soils Lab were not adequate
to handle the large number of samples obtained, therefore
County staff designed and built two drying racks that could hold
sixteen 2 feet x k feet x 6 inch deep sheet metal trays.  Thei
racks were enclosed with sheet metal and heated by a propane-fired
forced air heater.  This system maintained a relatively constant
temperature of 105° F, drying most samples in from 2 to 6 days.
     All samples were weighed before being placed in the drier.
The samples were subsequently checked and their weights recorded
every morning and evening.  When two consecutive recorded weights
were equal, the sample was considered dry.
     Data was obtained for two types of moisture samples:
     1.  Total Sample -  A sample was extracted from the sorting
         sample as it was loaded onto the pickup truck at the test
         cells.  This sample contained a representative amount  of
         all constituents and was not sorted.

                                  15

-------
These samples were dried separately and the data is reported
on plates 7-11, appendix E in the four, left hand columns.
Compos i te Sarop'le - Samples of each of the ten constituents
from each sorted sample were obtained and sealed in plastic
bags.  Four or more of these like category samples  were
combined for this drying procedure.  In combining the samples
only sequential samples were used and the constituent samples
of one cell were never mixed with those of another.
  i
This data is reported on plates 7-11, appendix E in the ten,
right-hand columns.  The samples from which the composite
sample was generated are listed under the appropriate
groupi ng.
                          16

-------
                 VI - OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT
AUTOMATIC OPERATIONS

Liquid Collection and Distribution System
     Cell C and D distribution and collection systems are controlled
by a central timer that activates twice daily at pre-set intervals.
Four standard house service water meters measure the quantity of
liquids applied to and discharged from the cells-  One meter measures
the fresh water inflow to the Cell C distribution system.  One
meter is connected to the leachate collection tank discharge line
of Cell C and records the quantity of leachate pumped from the
collection tank and disposed of in the adjacent main landfill.   A
meter Is installed in Cell D leachate return line and records the
leachate recycled through Cell D,  The final meter is on the fresh
water system for Cell D and records the make-up water that is added
to maintain the desired quantity of liquid recycled through Cell D.
     Cell A & E leachate is metered by a house service water meter
and discharged to the main landfill with an electric pump.  Cell
B leachate is discharged to a collection tank and the quantity  is
measured with a graduated bucket,,  The leachate  is disposed of
i n the ma i n 1 andfi1 I„

Storm Runoff Collection and Monitoring System
     Storm runoff from Cell B and the combined runoff from Cells A
and E is collected in swales constructed in the cell embankments
and discharged through drainage inlets to collection tanks.  The
collection tanks discharge through Sparling low pressure line meters
which record the runoff quantity,

MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT
     The site is inspected daily by disposal operation's personnel
to check for any vandalism, theft or equipment malfunction.  An
                                 17

-------
office engineer visits the test cell site weekly for a detailed
check on all systems and to record the monitoring data.   His
duties a re :
     1)   Record all  meter readings.
     2)   Check, retrieve and replace charts on the recording
         evapormeter and rain gauge.
     3)   Test the discharge rates for Cell C and D distribution
         systems.
     M   Check and test automatic timing system,
     5)   Record meter readings on storm runoff metering devices.

MAINTENANCE

     Although the Cell design and construction minimized the main-
tenance functions, three basic operational maintenance functions
rema in:
     1)   Since water service is not available at the site, water
         is  hauled by truck to a 6,000 gallon storage tank that
         supplies the dafly water for Cell 'C1 distribution and
         the makeup water for Cell D.
     2)   The distribution lines in Cells C £ D have to be cleaned
         per i od i ca11y.
         Cel1 C - The clear plastic tubing, connecting the discharge
         mahiford pipe to the small  diameter distribution pipe have
         to  be periodically cleaned of algae.
         Cell D - The small diameter discharge holes in the distri-
         bution piping clog due to fungus growth caused by the
         leachate.  These holes must be cleaned periodically.
     3)   The leachate generated from Cells A, B, C, E, and the
         adjacent sanitary landfill  is pumped into the sanitary
         landfill.  A 22-foot deep,  6-inch diameter grave 1-packed
         well was drilled in the main landfill refuse and is presently
         accepting all excess leachate from this project.  This
         construction is of a temporary nature and has to be
         checked and serviced because of line breakage due to
         landfill  equipment operations.
                                    18

-------
                   VI I  - MONITORING PROGRAM
GENERAL

     The monitoring program involves the collection of liquid
and gas samples for field and laboratory testing and retrieval  of
data from instruments installed in and about the test cells  and
clay barrier.
     Monitoring activities are carried out jointly by the staffs
of Sonoma County Department of Public Works and Emcon Associates.
Rainfall, evaporation, storm runoff and refuse settlement,  as well
as the metering of water and leachate flows into and out  of  Cells
C and D are monitored by Sonoma County Staff.   The staff  of
Emcon Associates collects and tests samples of leachate,  gas, Cell
C.input water, and groundwater, and monitors lysimeters,  thermisters,
and groundwater levels.
     All monitored data  is presented in Appendix H.

SAMPLING AND TESTING SCHEDULES
     Sampling and testing of leachate and groundwater commenced
in December 1971.  In February 1972, a formal  schedule for
frequency of leachate, gas and groundwater sampling and analysis
was adopted.
     The initial and revised sampling and testing schedules are
presented in Appendix F.

SAMPLE COLLECTION
Leachate, Groundwater, and Water Added to Cell  C and D
     Leachate samples are obtained at sampling  valves located in
the collection line just upstream from the leachate collection
tank.   The collection line discharges into the  collection tank

-------
through a riser which extends above the elevation of the sampling
valve.  This arrangement minimizes the exposure of the leachate to
the atmosphere.
     The groundwater is sampled and tested to detect any contamina-
tion by leachate escaping from the cells.   Groundwater samples
are bailed or pumped from the observation  wells and periodically
collected from the Cell A and E subdrain outfall.  Samples of
water added to Cell  C are obtained directly from the water distri-
bution tank.  The exposure of the groundwater samples to air during
the bailing and collection process, although not desirable, is not
considered detrimental  to detection of contamination by leachate.
     All samples of leachate and water are field tested for pH,
dissolved oxygen, electro-conductivity and temperature.  These
tests require approximately 100 to 200 ml. samples.  Samples scheduled
for laboratory testing of parameters that  deteriorate rapidly with
time are treated with a compatible preservative.  Samples  are
stored on ice from the time they are collected until they  are
delivered to the laboratory.  Upon arrival at the laboratory the
samples are refrigerated until tested.  Sampling and test  procedures
are discussed in detail in Appendix G.

Gas
     Gas samples are collected from the cell gas probes in gas
sample tubes.   Sampling procedures and the gas analysis test method
are presented in Appendix G.

Lys imeters
     Lysimeters are sampled periodically by injecting compressed
air through one of two ]/k Inch tubings connected to the lysimeter.
The fluid sample is discharged from the second \/k inch tubing
«nd collected for testing.  Fluid collected is field tested for
pH, dissolved oxygen and, when sufficient  quantity is available,
electro-conduct!vi ty.
                                20

-------
Fluid Distribution and Leachate Production

     Flow meters, installed at appropriate locations in the
distribution and collection piping of Cells C and D, are read
periodically to determine the quantity of fluid entering and
1eavi ng the ce11s.
                               21

-------
                       VI I I  - DISCUSSION

REFUSE STABILIZATION AND LEACHATE COMPOSITION
General Considerations
     Sanitary landfilling is now widely utilized for the disposal
of solid waste.   Careful planning and the application of sound
engineering principles to all facets of disposal site selection,
design, construction, and operation help insure that the environ-
mental impact of landfillfng is minimal and, in many cases, bene-
ficial.  With increased use and public awareness of this method of
disposal, increased interest has also developed with respect to
the pollution potential of leachate emanating from a landfill, its
possible detrimental  effects upon surface water and groundwater, and
a realization that in some cases, interception and treatment of
this liquid may  be necessary.  Considerable research on leachate
treatment is presently on-going tn many laboratories.
     Leachate production has been frequently documented by field
observations and case histories.  Production of leachate is most
prevalent in geographical areas which have relatively high annual
rainfall.  Limited data collected to date indicate that fresh
(initial) leachates are extremely high in both organic and in-
organic constituents   and provide potential sources of significant
amounts of pollutants.  Subsequent leachate contains less pollutants
as t i me passes.
     A large number of variables can interact to produce variable
quantity and quality  of leachate from landfills.  A few of the
relevant parameters affecting leachate quantity and quality are:
annual rainfall, runoff, infiltration, evaporation, freezing,
transpiration, ambient temperature, waste composition, waste density,
initial moisutre content, and depth of landfill.  Additional
variables are macro and micro nutrients,  and toxic elements and
compounds.
                                 22

-------
    Studies of leachate composition indicate wide variation from
site to site and at any given site with time.  A summary of typical
leachate composition is provided in Table 2.  Adding to the com-
plexity of the problem is the fact that the volume of leachate
produced frequently varies widely over time at any one site.
    The biologic decomposition of organic wastes also generates
gas of varying composition.  The gas usually consists of varying
concentrations of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and methane,
The gas composition reflects the type and extent of biologic pro-
cesses occurring in the refuse.
    This study was designed to investigate the effect of several
modes of operation upon the rate and extent of stabilization of
municipal  refuse in sanitary landfills.  Five test cells were
constructed and subjected to the operational modes presented in
Table 1.  The modes of operation chosen for this study include:
(1) addition of an excess volume of water after refuse emplacement,
(2) continual through-flushing with water,  (3) rec5rculatSon of
leachate,  and (4) addition of septic tank pumplngs to the landfall
materials.
    The extent of refuse stabilization was evaluated principally
by monitoring leachate and gas composition during a two and one
half year  period.  Primary leachate composition parameters monitored
included biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand
(COD), pH, alkalinity, volatile acids, phosphate, and forms of
nitrogen.   In addition, electrical conductivity, temperature, and
various inorganic anions and cations were monitored to define
leachate composition..   The time response of these parameters is
presented  in Figures 10 through 40.  A discussion and comparison
of refuse  composition  is presented, followed by a short discussion
of the general effect of seasonal variation of moisture content,
rainfall infiltration, and temperature, after which each test cell
is discussed separately with comparisons made to both the control
cell and to literature information.

Refuse Composition
    Refuse compositional analysis data is presented in Appendix E
and is summarized in Table 3, Refuse Moisture Content Summary, and
Table *•, Refuse Composition Summary.   Both moisture and weight
                              23

-------
percentage figures for the various waste constituents are quite
similar for all cells.  The average weight percentage of waste
constituents from all cells are compared with similar compositional
data for the City of Berkeley, California, the County of Santa Clara,
California (Golueke & McGauhey, 1970), and work by Dr. Pohland
at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Table 5-  The average
values determined for the various waste constituents  in the Sonoma
County study are reasonably similar to the values developed for
the City of Berkeley and the County of Santa Clara.   Each of the
California studies differ significantly from Dr. Pohland's Georgia
study in percentage of textiles, metals, glass and food wastes.
Data from Dr.  Pohland's study  is included, as several of his project
objectives parallel objectives of this study.
    The Sonoma stu.dy developed a somewhat lower percentage by
weight of paper as compared to the City of Berkeley,  Santa CHara
County and Dr. Pohland.'s study figures.  Frequently,  paper is re-
ported in the literature as comprising over *»5 percent of the total
waste.  The most recent finding by the National Center for Resource
Recovery (1973)> however, indicates the national average of paper
content is 35 percent.

Moisture Content
    Moisture content of landfill materials during active decom-
position of organic components is one of the most important In
situ factors affecting the rate and nature of biological processes
as well  as the quantity and quality of the gas and quality of the
liquid leachate ultimately produced.   All sources of  moisture must
be considered important, and they are:  water content of initial
refuse,  metabolic water formed during decomposition  (usually
minor),  infiltration water due to rainfall or groundwater, and
any art 5 f. icidlil.y added water.
    In this study five test cells have been utilized  to investigate,
among other things, five different moisture regimes  (Table 1).  The
usefulness and practicality of operationally controlling or modify-
ing the moisture content of a solid waste landfill has been
approached from a two-fold point of view: (1) to study the resultant
change,  if any, in rate of stabilization of the landfill materials,
and (2)  to investigate the quality of leachate produced both as a

-------
m««sur« of  (1) above and  •*  • measure  of  potential  pollution of
adjacent groundwater sources.
    The test conditions chosen  for  this study  were  (1)  ambient
moisture conditions of the refuse material  and any  natural  Infil-
tration water  (Cell A); (2)  cell refuse materials  brought  to field
capacity* by addition of  fresh  water and  then  no  further  Intentional
additions of water  (Cell  B);  (3) fresh water added  to  the  top of the
refuse and  removed  from the  base at a  rate  of  700>  gallons  per day
continuously (Cell  C); (k) leachate recirculated  through  the refuse
at the rate of 1000+^ gallons per day using  freshwater  make-up as
necessary to compensate for  losses  (Cell  D);  (5)  cell  refuse
materials brought to field capacity by the  addition  of  septic tank
pumplngs and then no further  intentional  liquid additions  (Cell £)„
In each case,  refuse was  emplaced in a cell constructed with im-
pervious clay  base  and walls.   The  cell surface was  then  sealed
with an impervious  layer  of  clay to preclude  infiltration.
    It soon became  obvious that  little or no  leachate  would  be
produced in Cells A, B and E unless additional water was  added.
Since leachate analysis data comprised the  principal evaluation
methodology in the  program,  it  was  apparent that  additional  water
Input to these cells was  necessary  to  develop  some  leachate  for
testing and analysis.  Consequently, rather than  seal  surface
                                                i
cracks resulting from summer drying, winter rainfall was  permitted
to find its way  into the  cell refuse by short  circuiting  through
cracks in the  cover material.   After some surface water from the
first winter rains  entered the  refuse, natural swelling of  the soil
sealed the  surface  cracks and thereafter  the cover  material  was
relatively  impervious.
    Infiltration water influences the moisture content of  the
cells, and  hence, the process of refuse stabilization.  Rainfall
records (Figure  30) for the  study site show very  little precipita-
tion occurred  during the  first  winter  (1971-72).   In addition,
the cells were completed  in  the winter and  no  drying cracks  occurred
   • i' i
*Fi eld capacity  is defined as the condition  achieved by adding water
 to the point where a significant  volume of leachate is just
 produced.

                                  25

-------
 in this first rainy season.  Consequently, very little leachate
 developed as a result of infiltration.  The second winter
 (1972-73) however, was a year of near-record rainfall, and leachate
was developed in all cells, indicating infiltration.  The pattern
of increased leachate production following heavy rainfall was
 repeated during winter 1973-71* (Figure 30).
     Cell D was a fully saturated system prior to the heavy 1972-73
winter rains and has been monitored on a continuous basis.  Prior
 to the winter rains, (before November 1972), the quantity of re-
 circulated leachate applied to Cell D was approximately 6,000 to
 8,000 gallons per week (Figure 33).  The max Imum quantity of re-
 circulated leachate put through Cell D was approximately 37,000
 gallons per week (February and Harch 1973).  This large Increased
 volume of recycled leachate was due primarily to Infiltrated rain-
water, as is evidenced by a repeated Increase In recycled leachate
 following heavy rainfall  In winter 1973-71*, with maximum recycled
 volume occurring during March-April, 197^ (Figure 33).
     There are some differences In Infiltration rates between cells.
The refuse in both Cells  B and E was wetted to field capacity,
but the cells responded to the Initial Infiltrated volume of rain
water (winter 1972-73)  in different manners (Figure 30).   It is
not clear why the rate of leachate production was so different
between Cells B and E during this time,  but it may have resulted
from a combination of different permeability of the soil  cover
layer and differences in  the rate of stabilization due to mode  of
operation.   Cell  E was  originally seeded with 27,200 gallons of
septic tank pumpings and  also  received 7,^00 gallons of rainfall
before the cell  cover was placed.   The cell  gave early indications  .
of vigorous anaerobic biological  activity.   Approximately  41,000
gallons of water were added to Cell  B to bring it  to field capacity
before the top cover was  applied (Table  1).   When  compared to con-
trol  Cell  A,  both Cells B and  E show considerably  greater production
of leachate.   Leachate production during and following heavy winter
                                26

-------
rains (1973~7M indicates that on a cumulative basis Cell B and
Cell E are presently substantially equivalent in terms of leachate
volume produced.

Thermal  Response                                '
    Although chemical and biological processes are, In general,
termperature dependent both as to rate and ultimate equilibria, it
is not reasonable at the present time to speculate on the effect
of temperature on leachate composition other than in general terms.
The multiplicity of chemical and biological processes occurring
within a landfill  are so complex as to preclude any attempt at
rigorous treatment.   On the other hand,  observation indicates
real differences in cell temperatures with time, depth and mode
of operat ion.
    The seasonal temperature variations  for this study (Figures
3^-39) show an ambient range of almost 20° C. over the annual cycle.
In general, there is an apparent temperature response of the upper
several  feet of the landfill to long term  (seasonal, annual!)
variations  in mean ambient temperature (monthly mean)*, while the
deeper materials tend to show a smaller  response (figures 35-39).
An annual mean temperature variation of  16° C. was observed at the
site of this study,  but larger annual temperature changes would be
expected under different c 1 i ma to 1 og i ca 1  conditions.,  Short term
(diurnal) variations in ambient air temperature appeared to have
no appreciable effect on the cell temperature regime.
    The literature on both diurnal and annual cycles of heating
and cooling of soil  shows a typical lag  in heating and cooling
at depth compared to the annual or diurnal surface cycle (Geiger,
1965; Singer and Brown (1956)*  The exact  lag depends upon latitude,
media porosity, and depth from surface (Strahler and StrahHer, 1973)
For  each climate region there  is a depth  below which  the soil or
rock temperature is essentially unchanging year round, and this
^National Weather Service Data collected
 at Petaluma, California Fire Station No,, 2
                             27

-------
temperature is typically very close to the average annual  a ii r
temperature near the ground surface (Strahler, 1971; Rlehl, 1972).
    Thermal response of Cells A, B and E as a function of depth
over two complete annual cycles is depicted in Figures 35, 36  and
37°  Cells A,  B and E have not been disturbed in any way since
placement of initial materials.  Typical moderation of maximum
and minimum temperature is seen with increase in depth as is  the
shift in time of maximum thermal response as compared to mean  am-
bient air temperature.  In contrast, Cells C and D, which receive
daily applications of liquid, show a pronounced thermal  response
over the whole depth with the seasonal cycle  (Figures 38 and  39)-
This corresponds to both the mean monthly air temperature and  the
temperature of water added (Cell C) and the 1eachate rec5rcu 1 ated
(Cell D).  This termal response over the total depth of  the cell
reflects the fact that the temperature of the applied liquid  tends
to approach mean ambient air temperature at the time of  application

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

General
    Experience with sampling procedures and analytical  methods on
numerous samples of leachate has necessitated changes in both
sampling techniques and analytical  methods.  The need for such
changes was generally anticipated,  but it was not possible to
specifically predict them, as leachate exhibits a complex and
changing nature.
    The following general statements can be made about  analytical
methods as related to leachate tests:
    1.   The analytical  philosophy should be one of attention to
        accuracy rather than precision,,
    2.   The analysis 5s made difficult by the danger of inter-
        ferences due to the high concentration of solutes and
        the changing nature of the  leachate,
    3<>   Color Smetr i c methods are generally not applicable due to
        the complex nature of the solution and the high
        background color of undiluted  leachate samples.   For
                                  28

-------
         example,  it  Is  not  possible  to  analyze  for  calcium and
         magnesium on  undiluted  leachate samples  using  the
         normal EDTA  titrimetric  technique  due to masking of the
         end point by  background  color.

      *. The concentrations of most common  constituents  In  leachate
         are generally very high  and  require dilution prior  to
         analys is,

      5. Matrix effects were observed In the analysis of some
         parameters.

      Experience  with analysis of several leachate constituents has
  indicated  unusual  and persistent problems.  Specifically,  these
  are  analysis  of  total phosphate, chloride, BOD  and  COO   A
  significant  fraction of the  total  phosphate  in  solution appears
  to be  of a refractory nature and has thus  required  strict  adher-
  ence to th. digestion sequence  utilizing  the  sulfuric  acid-nitric
  acid digestion sequence (APHA,  1971,  p.  525).   Chloride analysis
  has been subject to  considerable interference when  colorimetrlc
 methods have  been used.  On  undiluted leachate  samples,  It  may
 on occasion be necessary to  use  a potentIometrIc  tltration  tech-
 n Ique.

     BOD/COD determinations of leachates cannot be expected
 to exhibit  the precision usually attributed to them due to  the
 complexity  of the solutions.   Among the many factors which
 could contribute  to this lack of precision 4r. tne fe,lowMg:
 U)  high  toxlclty in some leachate samples causing a marked
 depression  of  the BOD values; (2) high levels  of halogens in
 the  leachate  may  have resulted In inadequate  levels  of  mercuric
 sulfate being  added,  thus giving  high COD values due to
 oxidation of chlorides to chlorine;  (3)  certain  low  to  moderate
 molecular weight  fatty acids  are  not  oxidized  by  the COD
 methodology unless high  levels of silver sulphate- catalyst
 are present; (*)  ammonia  will  oxidize  biologically but  not  be
 represented in the COD determination  due  to losses by
volatilization.   Considering  the  multitude  of contributory
factors  and  the fact that BOD values are frequently  close
to those for COD,  one would expect on a  statistical  basis,
                                      Reproduced from
                                      b«st available copy.

-------
that BODiCOD ratios might occasionally occur that would be greater
than one.  These inversions have indeed been observed, primarily
in the more recent determinations for Cell C. (See tabulated data
i n Append i x H).
Total Suspended Solids
Analytical  measurement of total suspended solids (TSS) in leachate
samples is  subject to possible error because of the oxidation of
reduced iron and manganese and the subsequent precipitation of
ferric hydroxide and manganese dioxide in the sample.  Depending
upon the sequence of sampling and the care of analyses, experience
has shown that  an inordinate variation in measured total  suspended
solids (TSS) results (See tabulated data in Appendix H).   Our
experience  has  shown that when proper care is taken to avoid the
formation of precipitate in the sample, that TSS is generally
low (50 ppm).
     Considering that great care must be taken at all  points in
the handling of the sample to avoid introduction of oxygen prior
to measurement  of TSS and also that the data are marginal in
terms of interpretive value, measurement of TSS in leachate is not
recommended and was discontinued prior to the third year  of this
study.

Co lor
     Quantitative measurement of color is useful  only to the extent
that it measures the relative intensity of this parameter and
may be correlatable with other more meaningful  measurements.  Since
even slight turbidity (suspended solids)  causes the apparent color
to be noticeably higher than the true color,  it is necessary to
remove suspended material  before true color can be approximated.
Removal of suspended solids is normally done  by centrifugation.
     Measurement of color in leachate samples is  somewhat com-
plicated by the fact that diffusion of oxygen into the  leachate
sample causes the oxidation of reduced Fe and Mn  solution species,
and, hence, the precipitation of the hydroxide  and dioxide,
                               30

-------
respectively.  The formation of small, colloidal solids inter-
feres with the color measurement, and due to the high concentra-
tion of reduced iron (and probably Mn) in solution, it is necessary
to either (1) prevent oxidation and precipitation from occurring,
or (2)  allow complete oxidation and precipitation to occur and
remove  the precipitate by centrifugation.
     The first procedure, preventing diffusion of oxygen into
the sample,  requires care in handling of the sample at all points
of transfer  prior to analysis.  The second procedure is more time
consuming than the first and may  still result in very small  colloida
particles remaining in solution despite centrifugation.  Given the
limited value of the color measurements to begin with and the
handling problems discussed above, measurement of color in leachate
is not  recommended and was discontinued during the second year
of this study,.

Electro-Conductivity Ratios
     A  review of leachate quality (both from literature and  this
study)  shows a wide varration in  concentrations of measured
constituents running over several orders of magnitude.   Consequently
there are typically problems of dilution associated with analytical
determination of most chemical constituents,.
     Selection of the degree of dilution required for various analy-
tical tests  is complicated by the changing nature of leachate
as a function of time and sfte.  Since electro-conductivity  (EC)
is essentially a measure of the concentration of dissolved ions
in solution, there is a strong possibility that a correlation
between EC and major ionic species can be made.   The correlation
between EC and other chemical parameters has therefore been
investigated as a possible aid in predicting a proper dilution
ratio.
     Results utilizing the available data indicate the EC ratios
may prove of value in estimating  dilution requirements  for some
parameters.  Ratio data for leachate from Cells C and D are
presented in Tables 6 and 7   Especially good correlation is  found
between EC and alkalinity, BOD, COD, Na and «„   Somewhat  greater

-------
scatter is seen for the data on calcium and magnesium.  The large
standard deviation in data on sulfate is expected since SOi,
is a reactive compound under reducing conditions and hence should
not be expected to follow EC values consistently, although
F.C/SO^"2 ratios should increase as SO^ is reduced to sulfide.
     Except for magnesium and sulfate, the EC ratios for Cells C
and D are surprisingly close.  This indicates that, at least for
these few parameters, EC ratios can be used effectively in esti-
mating concentrations for dilution in the laboratory.  This may
be especially useful  in cases where spot samples are brought in
for analysis with no prior information on the leachate composition.
     Typically, there is less than a factor of two variation in
the range of EC/parameter ratios for alkalinity, calcium, chloride,
magnesium, potassium, sodium, and TDS (see 18-week averages in
Tables 6 and 7).  Considering the variation in absolute concentra-
tions of several orders of magnitude, it appears that there is
considerable merit in the use of EC/parameter ratios for predicting
di1ut i on rat i os *
     Of special interest is the fact that EC/BOD and EC/COD ratios
increased by almost an order of magnitude in Cell D when vigorous
methane fermentation  began and when pH increased (12/73 on), in-
dicating that BOD and COO dropped dramatically in absolute
value, while general  concentrations of electrolytes remained high.
In contrast, EC/BOD and EC/COD ratios for Cell C (Table 6) remained
extremely stable, varying less than a factor of two over the
whole test period (for Cell C: EC/BOD mean of O.i»2± 0.15, tC/COD
mean of 0.31* 0.09, and for Cell D:  EC/BOD mean of 0.^5* 0.12,
EC/COD mean of 0.33* 0.10).

Gas Analyzer
     In addition to its use as a pump to withdraw gas samples from
i. iie gas probes, the gas analyzer also registers exp 1 os i b i 1 i ty of
the gas.
     Although the value registered is not used to determine
precise percentages of gases  present, the instrument can be used
to detect the presence of combustible gases  in air.
                               32

-------
The rm i s to rs
     In order to establish that thermistors installed within the
gas probe conduits register temperature representative of the
refuse  at that location thermistors were installed both inside and
outside the top gas probe in Cell  B   No appreciable difference
in temperature was registered by the thermistors,,  The compara-
tive data is presented in Table 8.,

Gas Samp 1 ing
     The initial  gas  samples obtained 12/8/71  were collected in
large evacuated sample bottles and  are considered to be uncon-
taminated samples..  These teat results are therefore reliable,
Samples taken between 1/3/72 and 3/1^/72 were  collected utilizing
a flushing  technique  which resulted in collection of samples
contaminated with atmospner.c air    Subsequent modification  of
the sampling technique to include  evacuation of the sample bottle
eliminated  this problem    Test results commencing 3/28/72 are
considered  representative of the gas produced  in the refuse  cells.
                              33

-------
TEST CELLS; TREATMENT, PURPOSE AND RESULTS
Variability of Leachate Composition
    The number of studies on leachate derived from sanitary land-
fills is increasing rapidly,.  Table 2 provides a summary of ranges
reported for parameters measured on leachates.  Tables 9 and 10
summarize the conditions under which the laboratory and field
studies were conducted to allow some comparison with the study
presented in this report.,  The range of values for the parameters
listed in Table 2 indicate a significant variation from site to
site as well as wide variations over time at any given site*  As
described earlier, the five test cells utilized in this study
were managed in different ways in order to evaluate the effects
of the various operational modes.  Discussion of the results ob-
tained from the test cells follows, beginning with a short dis-
cussion of the reactivity of cell ' construct ion materials,.
Reactivity of Cell Construction Materials
    In order to establish if percolation of additive water and
leachate was appreciably changed in quality due to solution', of
the granular materials utilized to distribute the liquids over
Cells C and D, 20 gram samples of material were placed in dis-
tilled water in 300 ml. BOD bottles.  Four sample bottles were
prepared for each of the three granular materials.  A schedule
was established to test the water at time intervals of one week,
six months, one year,  and two years, respective1y„  The tests
include pH, alkalinity, Na, K, Ca,  Mg, and electrical conduc-
tivity determinations.
    Test results  (Table 11) indicate that only insignificant
quantities of dissolved materials are contributed by the granular
materials used in the test cells.  The general composition of water
in continual contact with the granular materials appears to be
relatively stable In each case except for pH,  The test bottles
were exposed to sunlight during the latter part of the test,
allowing algal growths to develop.   Consequently, the decreasing
alkalinity, calcium and magnesium probably reflect biological
activity rather than some chemical  process.   The silty sand,

-------
concrete sand and pea grave) all exhibit about  the  same  solution
characteristics, none of which  indicate any substantial  contri-
bution to the leachate composition,,

Cell A - Control Test Cell
     Cell A was constructed  in accordance with normal sanitary
landfill practice and covered after the cell was filled with
refuse with no artificial addition of moisture,  A total of 530,35
tons of  refuse (997 yd 3) were placed, giving an average density
after compaction of about 106^ lb,./yd,30  The  average initial
moisture content (percent wet  weight) was 28  k percent (Table
12),

Leachate and Gas Composition:  The first significant quantity
of  leachate was collected from Cell A in October 1972,  During
this period the first rainfall of the winter was recorded.
Prior to the rains the soil  cover exhibited numerous random
shrinkage cracks*   Apparently a considerable volume of storm
water infiltrated Cell A (see Figure 30) before the clay cover
swelled, sealing the cracks,  it is obvious that the volume of
leachate produced by Cell A as of May, 1971* is significantly
less than for either Cell B or E,
     Data for leachaie samples for Cell  A prior to November
1972 indicate,  in  general,  very low values for the compositional
parameters when compared with leachate from other test cells
These low values prior to November 1972  may indicate that the
initial   leachate samples were condensate and,  hence, did not
carry the normal  load ot dissolved and suspended materials found
in  leachate   The  volume ot  leachate collected p :• i o r to September
1972 also supports  th.s  hypothesis (Appendix H)   in particular,
highly  soluble  elect .-oiytes  Such  as K, Na and  C) were found
in  low  con cen t s a t - on until  afte*"  hea\/y winter  rains produced a
                               35

-------
significant quantity of leachate (Figure 30).  Parameters show-
ing marked increase after November 1972 are EC, IDS, Ca, Mg, SO,,
volatile acids and alkalinity.  The pH remained at about 5-0 as
expected because of the high partial  pressure of carbon dioxide.
As a consequence of the limited data little can be said about the
activity within Cell A prior to October 1972, after which time
production of 1eachate a 1 lowed consistent monitoring.  Settlement
data, presented in Figure k1,  indicate that little settling
occurred before the 1972-73 winter rains.  In fact, a settlement
deflection occurred between September and November 1972 commen-
surate with early heavy winter rains.  Apparently, compaction
within the cell occurred due to an increase in total weight
caused by infiltrating water.
    Following the winter rains of 1973~7^» a significant volume
of leachate was produced (Figure 30)  and compositional data
indicate general reducing conditions with a pH of about 5.0 and
steadily increasing concentrations of most chemical constituents,
This general  trend can be explained almost totally on the basis
of the increasing quantities of water finding its way Into the
test cell, thus allowing more vigorous  microbial activity as
well as increased opportunity for solubi11zation of many con-
st i tuents.
    Although  initial levels of both phosphorus (P) and nitrogen
(N) were somewhat low in comparison to nutrient content in other
leachates, they were sufficient for biological activity a>nd, as
can be seen in Figures 18,  19, 20 and 21, the nutrients Increased
in concentration as increasing quantities of leachate were pro-
duced.  Biodegradation of organic material is proceeding as evi-
denced by the high concentration of C0_ (large partial pressure)
and the increase in volatile acids.  Methane has been measured
(Figure kQ) in low concentration (1% by volume), indicating
the presence  of methanogentc organisms, even though conditions
in the cell are far f rom op t i ma 1 . •' I; •>. • ; :',.:. * : " '...•'.. v i. I  i  i.
                               36

-------
     Trace metals data  (Table  13)  indicate that Cd was consist-
ently below the detection  limits for the analytical methods
used prior to January 197^   Since the 1962 U.S. Public Health
Service Drinking Water Standard of 0„0i  ppm for Cd is below the
detection limit of the analytical method employed, nothing
can be said concerning Cd as a potential  hazard relative to the
Drinking Water Standards except for the last  three data points,
all of which are above USPHS Standards.   Cu has been found
(Table 13) in the 0 „ 1  - 1„0 ppm range, but is generally below
the USPHS Standards (1.0 ppm),.  Zn , Pb and Hg, however, appear
to be consistently present in the  leachate in quantities above
or near the Drinking Water Standards (USPHS Standards: Zn-5 ppm,
Pb-50 ppb, Hg-5 ppb).   An analysis of  the potential for contamina-
tion of grouridwater by these metals must  take into consideration
the likely reactions  between the leachate and the soil through
which the leachate must pass to enter  the groundwater aquifer
and potential removal  mechanisms such  as  ion  exchange, adsorption
and prec i p i t at i on
     General trends for soluble electrolytes  such as Cl, Na ,
K, Mg and Ca correlate well with similar  increasing trends for
total dissolved solids (Figure 1A)  and electro-conductivity
values (Figure 15)   Increasing concentration of sulfate (Figure
17) ind.cates that the general reducing environment is not
severe enough to use  sulfate as the electron  acceptor in rrucrobial
metabolism and hence  the internal environment is apparently not
generally su«tabie for vigorous methane production,

Cell B - F.eld Capacity Test CeM
     Cell B  .s different from Cell  A only in  the respect that
41,000 gallons of water were added to  bring the eel'  up to
field capacity before  the cover material  was  placed   A total
of 5 2 *» 23 tons of refuse (997 yd 3 j were  piaced, giving an average
density after compaction of about 1052 Ib /yd *   The average
initial moisture content (percent wet   we.ght)  was  27.3 percent,
The added wate- brought  the mo > s i u •• e content  up to ^52 percent
at f.e'd capacity (Table '2)

                              37

-------
     Leachate and Gas Composition:  The initial addition of moisture
to Cell B was intended to bring the refuse moisture content to
field capacity, thus allowing any subsequent addition of water
to generate a nearly proportionate amount of leachate.  The
cumulative record of leachate production for Cell B (Figure 30)
shows the increase in leachate production resulting from early
winter rains (9/72 - 11/72).  The short duration of Increased
leachate production suggests that open cracks in the soil cover
were apparently sealed due to swelling, once the cover material
was saturated with moisture.  Apparently, infiltration was re-
latively-significant prior to the natural sealing of the cell
cover material.   Data for cumulative leachate production (figure
30) show only a minor volume of leachate produced during the
1973-7^ winter period, immediately after the first heavy rainfall,
again indicating an infiltration - sealing sequence.  This is  in
direct contrast to Cell  E, which produced a large volume of leachate
during the same time period.  On the other hand, Cell  A leachate
volume during the 1973-7'* winter period was almost negligible.
     Data on leachate composition must be separated into two
time periods.  The first Is the period from 12/71 immedi-
ately after Cell B was brought to field capacity and the onset
of the winter rains in October 1972.   The second period covers
the time interval  starting with the winter rains of 1972-73
(10/72 on).   Nothing significant can be said about data developed
during the earlier period.  This first set of data are scattered
and generally reflect concentrations of components in  leachates
in the ranges reported in literature.
     Leachate composition data for the second time period re-
flect real changes and can be explained in terms of volume flow-
through and biological  activity within the cell.  Generally
speaking,  it can be said that there continues to be anaerobic
bIodegradation  within the cell, and changes in gas composition
(Figure kQ)  as  of winter 1973-7^ mark   the beginning of signifi-
cant methane production.   This production of methane is in
                              38

-------
sharp contrast with normal  indicator parameters such as pH  and
volatile acids (Figures 26 and II).  Ph remains low  ( 5) and
volatile acids remain high  ( 15,000 mg/1).  However, a similar
response was noted in Cell C where significant methane production
occurred (7/72 - 12/72), while pH  remained low and volatile
acids high.  This is easily explained by the heterogeneous  nature
of the landfill environment, where many microenvfronments may
exist simu1taneious1y.   Apparently, general conditions within
the cell necessary for sulfate reduction have not developed,
as is evidenced by continued high  SOjj concentrations (Figure  17).
     Trends from October 1972 on,  for all parameters (except  pH
and P) indicate a possible dilution mechanism acting to lower
concentrations during periods of significant infiltration.
The decreases  in concentration for most parameters coincides
with periods of heavy winter rains (10/72 - 3/73 and 11/73  -  3/7M
This is especially evident  in trends for TDS and EC, both of
which reflect  decreasing concentrations with time (Figures  1 *»
and 15)-   Na,  K, Ca, Mg, and Cl, as well as volatile acids,
alkalinity, BOD, COD, and organic  nitrogen and ammonia (Figures
10 through 25) all reflect decreases in concentration commen-
surate with increases in total volume of leachate produced
(Figure 30).
     Thermal response of Cell B shows trends consistent with
literature data on thermal response of soil gases (see section
on Thermal Response for more complete discussion).
     Trace metals data (Table 13)  show compositions  for Cell  B
similar to those for Cell A.  Again, Zn, Pb and Hg tend to  be
at or above the USPHS Standards, while Cu generally  is below  1
ppm (except on 1/3/72)    Cd has been detected regularly and is
typically well above the accepted  USPHS Drinking Water Standard.
     The data  for Cell  B can be interpreted in terms of several
parallel ongoing processes   The general upward trend of con-
centrations in between periods of  diluti.on due to infiltration
water indicates ongoing decomposition processes leading to
                               39

-------
release of soluble materials, especially inorganic salts.
Although the increased moisture content during periods of in-
filtration initially tends to act as a dilutant, the secondary
effect would be to stimulate microbial activity (Alexander
1971), thus leading to increased release of more soluble materials.
     The rate of settlement for Cell B is quite similar to the
rate of settlement for Cells A and E (Figure k1),  even though
leachate production has been somewhat different.
Cell C - Continuous Flow-Through Test Cell
     Cell  C contains:a total of 521.72 tons of refuse with an
average initia 1  density after compaction of 106*» Ib/yd .   The aver-
age initial moisture content (percent wet weight)  was 25-6 percent
(Table 12).  The moisture content (percent  total weight)  at field
capacity was estimated to be near 60 percent .(assuming about 50
percent porosity for placed materia 1 after  compaction).  Water was
applied to Cell  C at a rate of approximately 700 gallons per day.
The general effects of this mode of operation are discussed below.
     Leachate generated by this cell is disposed of by injection
into a well in the adjacent County sanitary landfill.
Leachate and Gas Composition;  General time responses for leachate
composition parameters indicate decreasing  concentrations for all
parameters (except pH).  This general decrease reflects the
basic flushing action  of the water added to the cell in parallel
with ongoing anaerobic biodegradation of the fill  materials.  The
                                                              2
rate of addition of water to Cell C was designed to 0, *» gal/ft /day
Figure 31  presents the cumulative distribution and collection of
liquid for Cell  C.  The slope of the distribution curve  is 19-35
    •»                       "2
x 10  gal/month, or 0.3U gal/ft /day, slightly under the design
capacity.   The slope of the cumulative volume collected from
                    •»                           y
Cell C is  15.86 x 10  gal/month, or 0.22 gal/ft /day, an average
loss of about 18 percent, which can be attributed basically to
evapotranspi rat ion.
     The continuous steady application of water to Cell C has
resulted in a moderation of the thermal response of the upper
layers in  the cell as  is reflected in Figure 38.  This thermal

-------
response is different for Cells A, B and E, and more closely
resembles the thermal response of Cell D, where continuous
recycle of liquid also seems to be reflected  in a stable temper-
ature profile through the depth of the cell (Figures 35-39)*
A more detailed discussion of thermal ' response is given on
page 27.
     Trends in the data for gas composition,  alkalinity, volatile
acids, BOD, COO, organic end ammonia nitrogen, and suSfate all
indicate vigorous anaerobic microbial activity within the cell.
In spite of the low pH (Ca. 5-0) methane is being produced at
increasing rates (Figure kQ).   The decrease in SO. from earlier
levels indicates that sufficient reduc5ng, cond5tions exist for the
reduction of suifate to sulfide in the general environment (sulfate
acting as an electron acceptor).  The apparent contradiction of  low
pH and significant methane production can be  explained directly on
the basis of variations in local environments (so-called micro-
environments).  Because of the dissimilarities in the physical
and chemical determinants In a heterogeneous  environment and
the consequent establishment of somewhat distinct microbial
communities in the spatially separate microhabitats, one popu-
lation may be subjected to diverse stresses in the adjoining
microenvironments„  Thus, knowing that appropriate conditions
can exist in localized regions within the cell, it 9s quite
normal for vigorous activity of methanogenfc  organisms to occur
in what might otherwise appear unfavorable conditions,
     The vigor of the biodegradation processes is reflected in
the increasing percentage of NH, - nitrogen and decreasing per-
centage of organic nitrogen (Figures 20 and 21).  The strength
of the reducing conditions is reflected by the low level of NO.
(figure 19) and the smooth decrease of SO.  (Figure 17)°  Sulfate,
a strong anionic electrolyte under oxidizing  conditions, would
typically follow the same trends as C1 (Figure 16) which
generally functions as a quasi-conservative material.  However,
under appropriate reducing conditions, sulfate is utilized as an
electron acceptor and is reduced to sulfide during bio-oxidation
of organic matter.  The presence of CH.  and decreasing SO.
indicates strong reducing conditions.
                                         Reproduced from
                                         best available copy.

-------
     Nutrient concentrations (P and N) indicate that sufficient
quantities of nitrogen and phosphorus are available for biological
growth.  After almost three years of continual flushing, total
phosphate remains about 5-10 mg/1, substantially above minimal
nutrient requirements for most organisms.  It appears that the
flushing action will continue to remove nutrients from the cell
and may eventually lead to nutrient limited biological activity,
depending upon the availability of organic substates as well.
Ammonia nitrogen is decreasing, but at 50-100 mg/1 still remains
far in excess of nutritional requirements for most anaerobic
micro-organisms.  It appears from present trends, that macro
and micronutrients are being depleted and/or removed at comparable
rates .
     The quantity of oxygen contained in the water added to Cell
C may eventually affect the general composition of the leached
liquid, but at the present time, it appears not to be exerting
a strong influence.   There is the possibility that added water
with substantial Q£ concentration could be toxic to the anaerobic
organisms present in the landfill.   It is also likely that the
oxygen would be consumed rather rapidly as the water moves through
the cell depth and,  hence, only the upper layer would be affected.
This toxic behavior of oxygen would be reflected In the gas
composition, generally causing a lower production of methane
since molecular oxygen is known to be extremely toxic to methan-
ogen i c organ i sras.
     Concentrations  of dissolved materials and electrolytes
as reflected by the gross measurement parameters TDS and EC
(Figures \k and 15)  show a rather smooth trend toward lower
concentrations.  Specific parameters such as Na, K, Ca, Mg and
Cl reflect the same trends.  The decreasing concentrations are
compatible with vigorous  biodegradation since inorganic salts
and refractory organic solutes are expected end products of the
bio-oxidation process and should be easily washed out.  The
early data (first 6  months) showing high concentrations of
electrolytes should reflect the flushing out of readily
solubilized material, leaving behind those materials requiring
b i odeg radat i on.

                             J»2

-------
     Trace heavy metals data (Table lA) indicate that, except for
Cd, all metals monitored are present in substantial quantities,,
The concentrations of these metals are high but compatible with
a low pH and the presence of dissolved organic solutes which can
act as chelating agents-  Except for Zn,  no trends are apparent.
Zn concentrations are decreasing with time, indicating a
flushing action,  Zn, Pb and Hg are all high when compared to
USPHS Drinking Water Standards and pose a potential pollutional
hazard to groundwater and surface water sources.  Recognition
of the potential hazard is  important,
     The rate of settlement of Cell C (Figure kI) is more rapid
than the rate of settlement for Cell A, B, and E „  Cell C has
had continual throughput of water and the data  Indicate
accelerated compaction compared to control Cell A,   Settling
behavior of Cell C is similar to Cell D,   Similar observations
were made by Mao and Portland M973) on the rate of settling of
simulated landfills where leachate was recircuIated,
     The presence of po l y ch I of i nated bi'phen/ls  (.PCB)  was detected
on 3/2/72 at an 0.35 ppb level and 0,1*0 ppb on 3/28/72,  However,
none has been detected in subsequent analyses   Since  there is
no experience to allow prediction of time-concentration response
for PCB's under the conditions present in the test cell, further
monitoring of this parameter was justified at a reduced frequency.
It should be noted that in  the process of analyzing for PCB's,
other chlorinated hydrocarbons have been  detected   Specifically,
Lindane was found at the 0.06 ppb  level on 12/28/71,   No systematic
appearance of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides is evident and
hence does not appear to be a major concern in this study.
     The concentration of fecal coliform  and fecal  streptococci
(Figure 28 and 29)  ndicate a gradual  d ; e - o f f of these organisms
in CeM C, simi'ar to observations in other cells.   it was
expected that natural competition and inhibition processes  would
cause a reduction in the active organism  level as has been
observed

-------
 Cell  D  -  Continuous  Leachate  Recycle  Test  Cell
      Cell  D  contains  a  total  of  530.07  tons  of  refuse  with  an
 average  initial  density  after compaction of  1065  Ib/ycP.  The
 average  initial  moisture  content  (percent  bulk  weight)  was  22.7
 percent  (Table  12).   After  saturation,  it  is  estimated  that
 moisture  content  (percent total  weight)  is near 60  percent
 (assuming  about  50 percent  porosity  for  placed  material  after
 compaction).  Leachate  is recycled.and  redistributed  to Cell  D
 at  the  rate  of  about  1,000  gallons per  day.   The  time  response
 of  leachate  and  gas  composition  are  discussed below  for this
 mode  of operation.
      Leachate and Gas Composition: The  fluid  routing  for  Cell
 D over  the test  period  is presented  in  Figure 33.   It  is  evident
 that  the  volume  of recycled  leachate  has deviated by  at  least a
 factor of  10 during  the  test  to  date.
      Infiltrated  rainwater  added  to  the  volume  of leachate  de-
 veloped during  the heavy winter  rains of 1972-73  and  1973-7A
 (Figure 32), with the total volume of FnfF1trated water  being
 significantly less during wFnter  1973-7**.  The  daily  volume of
 recycled  leachate varFed  from a  low of  about  500  gal/day
 (3500 gal/week)  to a  high of  about 5,000 gal/day  (37,000  gal/ week).
 The surface  loading  rates for  these  daFly  volumes are  0.2 gal/
 ft2 / day and 2  gal/ft2 / day, respectfve1y.  Data onileachate
 composition  indicate  surprisingly stable concentration
 conditions during the transition  periods from low flow  to high
 flow, where  one might expect  an  apparent dilution effect.
      Na,  K,  Ca,  and  Mg  show an initial  leveling trend  indicating  that
 some control  mechanisms may be operating on  these alkali  and alka-
 line earth metals during the  early time period.   These  four
 rnetals,  usually quite soluble  (at low to neutral pH values for
 CA and Mg), show no major response to changes in  leachate volume
 during the periodslO/72 to 3/73 and 2/7^ to W71*.   TDS and,  to
some extent EC,  also  show a  leveling  trend commensurate with
the data for  Na, K,  Ca,  Mg,  as well  as Cl and alkalinity.  The
gradual  decline  in concentration  of these parameters as shown

                               kk

-------
in Figures 22-25 indicates that removal processes of some  sort
are acting to reduce the total mass remaining  in solution.  The
most probable maehanism for Ca and Mg  is precipitation of  some
                           ,-' •    •                '     ';  ; '
form of calcium-magnesium carbonate, especially after May  1973
when pH increased to 6.5 (Stumm and Morgan,  1970).  A sample
calculation for soluble calcium in equilibrium with solid  calcium
carbonate  (calcite polymorph) and  in the presence of ^000  mg/1
carbonate alkalinity at pH 6.5 gives a value of about 125  mg/1
  +2                                   "                 '
Ca   (using an activity coefficient of 0.2).  Now, knowing  that
a calcium-magnesium carbonate would be more  soluble than calcite
(by at least a factor of 2) and assuming considerable complex Ing
of calcium in solution by organic  chelates,  it  is interesting to
note that the calcium remaining in solution  /300 mg/1
predicted, 350 mg/1 actual)-  Additional possibilities, but
less probable, are adsorption and  ion exchange, neither of which
could reasonably account for the mass of Ca  and Mg removed  from
solution in the recycled teachate.
     Continuous recycling of leachate  in Cell D has moderated
the thermal response of the upper  layers in  the cell as reflected
          ;                       .                               i'
in Figure 39-  A more detailed discussion  is presented earlier in
the report.
     Active anaerobic biological activity  is suggested by  data
on gas composition, volatile acids and alkalinity.  The production
of CH,  increased sharply during the summer of  1972 and has  continued
at 50% by volume since September 1972.  These data suggest  strongly
that conditions within the cell were accommodating methanogennc
organisms even when low pH was measured in the collected leachate
before August 1973°  Thus, low pH  in collected  leachate cannot nec-
essarily be used as a criteria for viability of the pH-sens'i t J ve
methanogenic organisms.   As mentioned earlier  in discussion of
Cells B and C and in the general summary to  follow, mtcroenviron-
ments are the rule rather than the exception, especially in hetero-
                                                     1  '         '
geneous media found in refuse.  The strong reducing conditions
within the c@U are reflected in the absence of any substantial
nitrate (Figure 19), in the apparent reduction of sulfate  (Figure
17) and in the high values for soluble reduced  iron (Figure 27).
                                           eproduced from
                                           st available copy.

-------
The substantial reduction of soluble Iron occurring after August, 1973
corresponds to the period of Increasing pH and Increased mlcro-
blal metabolic activity.  Thus, the reduction may be due to
microbial utilization as a nutrient.  Both NO^ and SO^ are
utilized, sequentially, as electron acceptors during bio-oxida-
tion of organic material under strong reducing conditions.  The
increasing percentage of ammonia compared to total nitrogen
indicates a more complete degradation of organic matter.
Substantial quantities of organic matter apparently accumulated
in the leachate as is reflected in the relatively stable BOD
and COD measurements (Figures 12 and 13) in the period up to
June,  1973-
     The relatively high values for organic and ammonia nitro-
gen and the concentration of phosphate indicate that these
nutrients are not limiting to biological growth.   The reduction
in phosphate concentration with time may be indicative of bio-
utilization of phosphate.  Alternatively, precipitation of a
calcium and/or magnesium solid phase (such as a calcium apatite)
may be controlling the concentration of inorganic phosphate.
     A balance of the major ions in solution can  account for
most of the TDS,  but the leachate solution is sufficiently complex
that it is doubtful  whether any useful  information can be gained
by attempting a mass balance on the measured ions and a com-
parison with TDS.
     Heavy metals  appear to be accumulating in the recycled
leachate.  Inspection of values in Table 15 for Cu, Zn, Hg, and
Pb indicate a rather steady concentration pattern with time.
Cd does not follow this pattern within  the detection limits of
the technique used.   Cu has accumulated to about  0.1 - 0.2
ppm levels, below the USPHS drinking Water Standards.   Zn (Ca 20
ppm) ,  Hg (Ca 10 ppb), and Pb (Ca 0.2-0.4  ppm) all are substantially
above  the USPHS Standards for these metals.  The  high organic
content and low pH of the leachate solution are compatible with
the rather high levels of trace metalis  prior to the increase in
pH (Ca  3/73).  This is especially true for Zn.   The decrease in
Zn concentrations  correlate well with increased pH values which

                             A 6

-------
reflects the hydrolytic and solubility behavior of zinc.  Com-
parison of heavy metals data collected for Cell D with data from
other leachates (Table 2)  shows a general  correspondence in
ranges of values observed.
     The rate of settlement of Cell  D (Figure 41) is very
similar to the settlement  rate for Cell  C, both of which have a
continual throughput of liquid.  The settlement indicates
compaction and is consistent with the apparent biodegradation
occurring in both Cells C  and D0   The increased magnitude in
Cell D as compared with Cell C probably  represents the increased
stabilization reflected by  high methanogenic activity.  The
maximum settlement to May,  1974 reached  a  magnitude of approxi-
mately 6 inches, or about  7 percent  of the refuse thickness.
This rate of settling i's similar to  data for simulated landfills
(Mao and Pohland, 1973),
     Polych1 orinated biphenyls were  detected once on 3/28/72 at
the 0.2 ppb level.  No subsequent analysis showed any PCB's
to be present.  Lindane, a  chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticide,
was detected at the 0,07 ppb level on 1/18/72.  No subsequent
analysis shows evidence for the presence of pesticides.
Apparently most materials  of this nature have been either de-
graded or are being retained within  the  cell and are not in the
leachate at detectable levels.
     Data for fecal coltforra and fecal strep (Figures 28 and
29) indicate that there has been a gradual, but steady kill-off
of these organisms for all  cells, including Cells C and  D0   The
data confirm the expected  results of microbial competition  and
adaptation.   The only surprising development is the fact that
there is such little difference between  Cell E and Cells C  and
D.  Cell E,  seeded with septic tank  pumpings, might reasonably
be expected to have substantially more fecal organisms than
leachates from other cells,
     The general behavior  of leachate and  gas composition for
Cell D reflects the general  increased rate of biological  stabiliza-
tion of the  organic fraction of the  fill  refuse.   Although  the
data of Mao  and Pohland (1973)  show  a much more rapid rate  of

-------
refuse stabilization, the general trends are very similar and
kinetic differences can be explained simply on the basis of
toxicity and generally more concentrated leachate components.
Additional explanations may be possible, but it  is more Important
to recognize the similarities than to explain the differences.
In fact, the data generated by this study are consistent with
and complimentary to those provided by the study of Mao and
Pohland (1973).
Cell  E. - Biologically Seeded Test Cel1
     Cell  E was seeded with septic tank pumpings (27,200 gallons)
to provide microbial seed material to accelerate biological
degradation processes, and also to bring moisture content up
to field capacity.   A total of 521.93 tons of refuse were placed,
giving an  average initial density after compaction of about
10^7 Ib/yd3.  The average initial moisture content (percent
wet  weight) was 23.5 percent.  The added septic tank pumpings
brought the moisture content up to 37.2 percent, approximately
at field capacity (Table 12).  No additional management procedures
have been  used on Cell E.
     Leachate and Gas Composition;  Only small volumes of leachate
were produced in Cell E prior to October, 1972.   However, much
the same as for Cells A and B, Cell E has responded to precipita-
tion during 1972-73 and 1973~7^ winters by producing some measur-
able quantity of leachate (Figure 30).   The cumulative leachate
volume (Figure 30)  for Cell E has a time response somewhat
different  from Cells A and B during winter 1972-73.  It is not
understood at present why the t i.me response is so different during
this  period.  Data  for Cell E shows a slow, smooth increase in
leachate production during the heavy winter rains only tapering
off after  the precipitation of February, 1973-  The most plausible
explanation for these data is that the top soil  cover of Cell E
has a higher permeability compared to Cells A and B.   A
higher permeability would allow slow but continuous infiltra-
tion  of rainwater into the cell  and would not necessarily exhibit
surface cracks.   The less permeable soil with cracks  would allow

-------
an immediate infiltration of rainfall, but once closed by swelling,
it would be relatively impervious.  The data cannot be explained
by other differences in cell preparation and maintenance.  The
time response for leachate production after 6/173 shows similar
behavior in Cells A, 8, and E.
     The general trend of all parameters for Cell E (except pH)
appears to be toward increasing concentratton , in most cases
stabilizing at extremely high concentrations.  For example,
volatile acids(Ca 20,000 mg/1), BOD(Ca  40,000 mg/1), COD (Ca 60,000
mg/1 ) ,  TDS (Ca 30,000 mg/1 ) , Cl (Ca  3,000 mg/1 ) ', sul fate (Ca 1500
mg/1),   Initial  pH values were  around 6.0and considered along with
early  gas composition and volatile acid data it is apparent
that biodegradation of organic  matter was accelerated due to the
seeding with septic tank pump ings.  However, it now appears
that the early biological activity may have been at the expense
of easily decomposable material, since data collected since
October, 1972 indicate increasing volatile acids, alkalinity,
BOD and COD (Figures 10-13) with a corresponding decrease in
pH to  about 5 (Figure 26),,  A similar response to seeding was
experienced by Mao and Pohland  (1973) in their study of simulated
landfills.   Their discussion suggested that accelerated acid
fermentation may overwhelm the  buffer capacity, of the system
                                              s
leading to suppression of methane formers.
     The increasing concentration of readily soluble salts such
as Na,  K, Ca, Mg, and Cl  (Figures 16, 23-25) is reflected by
parallel increases in TDS and EC over time (Figures \k and 15)«
The general increase in concentration can best be explained as
a leaching of readily so tub Mi zed materials made available by the
early  biodegradation of organic matter.   This explanation is
supported by the opposite response to infiltration water in Cell
B which, while brought to field capacity the same as Cell E,
did not have the microbial seed to accelerate the biological
processes
     No substantial  change is evident in the gas composition
which  remains with substantial  percents  of C02 (901+)  and

-------
measurable CHi, (5*+).  Although anaerobic, the cell environment
apparently is not yet sufficiently reducing to convert sulfate
to sulfide as is evidenced by increasing concentrations of SOij
(Figure 17).   Even though the rate of production of leachate  is
different between Cell E and Cells A and B, the rate of settle-
ment for these three cells is quite similar (Figure ^1).  Cell
B was brought to field capacity prior to sealfng.   Whereas Cell
E was brought close to field capacity, Cell A was  not moisture
conditioned,  but received relatively small quantities of rain-
water during construction of the cell.
     The P and N nutrient levels (Figures  18-21) in Cell E
leachate indicate that neither nutrient can be considered
limiting by normal biological requ i reinen ts .  Although the
specific nutrient requirements of the anaerobic microorganisms
existing in the cell are unknown, ft Is safe to say that the
nitrogen and phosphorus available In the leachate  are at least
an order of magnitude above minimal requirements.
     Heavy metal  content of Cell E leachate (Table 13) follows
the same trend as for Cells A and B.  Cd Is either just at or
below the detection limits of the analytical methods used and,
when detected, is above the USPHS Drinking Water Standards.
Cu is generally found at levels below 0.2 ppm, while Zn , Pb ,
and Hg tend to be at or above the 1962 USPHS Standards.

GROUNDWATER QUALITY

     One of the major concerns about sanitary landfills is the
pollution potential  of leachate and the possible contamination
of adjacent surface water and groundwater.   The purpose of
monitoring the quality of groundwater in close proximity to the
test cells and down  valley from the cells is to maintain a check
on the effectiveness of the earth cells in preventing leachate
from contaminating the underlying groundwater.
     The data collected to date (Appendix H) indicate that the
quality of the groundwaters taken from test wells  1 through  k
remain stable in  terms of the parameters most likely to indicate

                            50

-------
pollution by leachate.  The parameters most likely to indicate
the presence of leachate contamination are those relatively
conservative parameters (from the point of view of groundwater)
such as C1, Na, K, Ca, Mg ,  SO/,, and alkalinity.  In addition,
gross measurements such as  TDS and EC are also valuable
indicators of changes in composition.  The data collected show
no significant shifts in composttion of the water in any of the
wells.   The indications are that no contamination of the
surrounding groundwater aquifer has occurred to date.   Therefore,
the clay liners are assumed to have maintained their integrity
at this point in tfme,,  This conclusion is further supported
by data on the quality of water extracted from the sub-cell
lysimeters presented in Appendfx H.

GENERAL SUMMARY OF REFUSE STABILIZATION
     The use of landfilling as a means of disposing of solid
wastes has been widely employed as an economical method of refuse
disposal,   Typically, the organic and inorganic constituents of
the refuse are subject to microbia!  and chemical degradation
and hence will leach as water percolates through the waste
materials.  Unless contained, the leachate may enter groundwater
aquifers, surface streams, lakes or  impoundments.   Guidelines for
land disposal  of solid wastes generally include recommendations
that the design consider potential leachate production and, thus,
include a system for protection of ground and surface waters.
The eventual appearance of leachate  and gas problems at or near
most landfill  sites emphasizes the need to understand the refuse
stabilization  processes and the need to eventually control those
processes.
     The production of leachate and  gases from sanitary landfills
is a direct consequence of the unavoidable chemica1-bio1ogica1
activity which must occur in the refuse materials.  The only
real question  is one of the time dependency of major processes
extant in the  landfill

                              5!

-------
The most  important overall processes are those  involving the
anaerobic microbial metabolism of the organic materials  in the
fill refuse.   It was the purpose of the study reported herein
to demonstrate methods by which stabilization of  refuse  compon-
ents might be  accelerated by deliberate managed techniques.
It is useful to summarize here the general trends of sequences
of refuse stabilization.  Although the exact definition  of the
condition of a specific site and/or its pollution potential  is
not possible here, it is possible to describe the stages of
stabilization  on the basis of past experience with  landfill
leachate  and gas composition, as well as the available literature
information on anaerobic microbial decomposition  processes.
     A young site  In a region of moderately heavy precipitation
will generally accumulate moisture until it reaches field capa-
city (unless otherwise treated).  As the Initial  anaerobic bio-
degradation processes occur the acid fermentation phase will
predominate yielding leachate with a low pH, high volatile acids,
considerable inorganic Ions (eg., Cl, S0j,~ , Ca+2, Mg + 2,  Na+)
and a gas composition almost totally CO^.- This phase of
stabilization  reflects the fact that anaerobic faiodegradation is
a two-stage process.   In the first stage the bacteria grow by
utilizing anaerobic fermentation yielding organic solute products
composed mainly of volatile fatty acids.  The extent of  this
fermentation depends  on the degree of anaerobiosis  (degree to
which Q£  is excluded).   In this stage pH generally  falls (be-
cause of the volatile fatty acids as well  as the  high partial
pressure of 002)  and CO-2 is the principal  gaseous product.  The
principal energy sources consist of solutes such  as starch,
cellulose, hemicellulose and pectic residues,  glycerol from
lipids  (probably small  amounts), and any available  po1ysaccharides
and mucopo1ysaccharides.   This  fermentation is carried on by a
varied  flora and typically produces a mixture  of  volatile fatty
acids,  ethanol, C02 and H2.   Lignin-type aromatic compounds are
probably not degraded to any extent anaerobica11y ,  since lignin
degradation is  an aerobic process,  although there is the possi-
bility  of methanogenesis (in the second stage),  as  the aromatic

                            52

-------
ring in a benzoate can be degraded by methanogenic bacteria from
sewage.
     All these processes are carried out by a mixed anaerobic
flora,  many of them strfct anaerobes.  There are also facultative
anaerobes present in varying numbers, and while these aid in the
breakdown of materials, they are, most importantly, responsible
for utilizing oxygen in solution, thus producing sufficiently
low reducing conditions so that strict anaerobes can grow.
     Methane fermentation is the second stage of the overall anaerobic
process.  The methanogenic bacteria are strict anaerobes and oxygen
at any  detectable level is extremely toxfc to these organisms
and will inhibit their growth.   in general, methanogenic bacteria
are slow-growing and have tight pH tolerances (6.6 - 7.M.
Methanogenic bacteria, like other organisms utilizing nutrients
of substrates whose avaflability is regulated by abiotic factors,
present a special situation in  regard to ecological amplitude.
The availability of many soluble or insoluble nutrients^ both
organic and inorganic, changes  as the level or intensity of these
factors is  modified; for example, pH regulates the extent of
retention of numerous soluble nutrients while the  redox potential
determines  whether or not several inorganic nutrient elements
are in  a form readily assimilated.   These abiotic  processes come
in addition to the physiological tolerances of the various
microbes themselves,
     The nitrogen requirements  of the methanoge"ic bacteria are
not completely known.  It seems that they can use  NH^ and possibly
some amino  acids.  The substrates for methane formation by different
species of  methanogenic bacteria have been given as H2 + C02,
formic, acetic and butyric acids, ethanol  and methanol.   Hydrogen
and C02 and formate are definitely substrates, but all the possible
substrates  for methanogenesis are probably present in leachates.
          ii
     Me t h anoge nesis is subject to substrate inhibition by high
levels  of volatile fatty acids  and since methane bacteria are
s1ow-growing , removal of volatile fatty acids by methane bacteria
is often the rate limiting step in the anaerobic digestion
process.  Too rapid a primary fermentation results in accumula-

                            53

-------
tion  of volatile fatty acids, the cessation of methane fermenta-
tion and a slow-down of the overall process.  This was observed
by Mao and Pohland  (1973) in the simulated  landfill which was
seeded with sewage  sludge and appears to have occurred in Cell
E in this study.
     It  is fair to  say that leachate and gas composition reflect-
ing near neutral pH, low volatile acids, low total dissolved
solids and high CH^ content (50%) in the gas likely reflects
older landfill sites which have already undergone substantial
stabilization of the readily available organlcs in the refuse.
The composition of  leachate and gas from Cell D at the present
time (June, 197*0 reflects such a situation.
     Although the activities and very existence of a microbial
population are associated with a multitude of abiotic factors,
a range  (maximum and mfnfrnum)  Is usually established for each of
these factors.  These are physiological limits beyond which the
microbial population Is unable to matntain  itself or to perform
a vital   function.   For each factor an optimal level or range
can usually be established, in addition to an upper limit.   Thus,
in  a heterogeneous  mixed media system such as is found in a land-
fill, it is to be expected that many environmental conditions
co-exist in different places,  leading to the formation of different
microenvironments where quite  different types of organisms
may grow.  Therefore, it is not surprising to find methane  pro-
duced in a landfill  which appears to have a  leachate pH of  5
(even though methanogenic organisms cannot exist at pH 5).
The reason this can occur is because there are pockets or regions
(microenvironments)  in the landfill where conditions allow  these '
organisms to survive.
     The level of moisture content has an important role in pro-
moting refuse stabilization.   It is not possible at this point
to  quantitatively state what an absolute minimum moisture content
or  optimum content  might be, but generally speaking, the more
moisture, the better (A 1 exan de r, 1 9 7 1 ) .  Old  literature data

-------
(McKinney, 1962)  suggests 60 percent moisture as a minimum,
but additional  evidence is needed before a judgement can be  made
for landfill  situations.
     Although the rate of biodegradatfon is affected by tempera-
ture,  there is  no possibility of controlling this  parameter  in
any practical manner and  it is not discussed here.
     Data from  this  study and that of Mao and Pohland (1973)
indicate that accelerated refuse stabilization occurs with recycled
leachate, and data' presented by Mao and Pohland show that arti-
ficial  control  of pH at near neutral  values when recycling
leachate will further accelerate the stabilization process.
                             55

-------
CONCLUSIONS
1.  Control Cell A shows ,time dependence of leachate and gas
    composition consistent with general behavior of typical
    sanitary landfills.  This cell provides a comparative standard
    basis for the other four managed cells.
2.  Adding moisture to raise moisture content to field capacity
    does accelerate stabilization processes to an observable
    degree,as evidenced by early production of methane.  Bringing
    landfill materials to field capacfty immediately after
    placement accelerates the development of leachate and
    presumably enhances faiodegradation processes even though not
    observed during the duration of thfs study in terms of leachate
    quality.  No increase in rate of settling of fill material
    was observed resulting from the addition of moisture.
3.  Continual flow-through of water accelerates stabilization of
    refuse materials, flushes out soluble materials and increases
    the rate of settlement of fill material.  The inorganic
    solutes and organic solutes are reduced at equivalent
    rates.  Early production of methane occurs in this mode of
    operation.   All measures of soluble leachate constituents
    are significantly reduced.
k.  Continual flow-through mode of operation does not appear to
    be economically feasible due to the large quantity of leachate
    wh i c-h would require handling.
5.  Recircu1 ation of leachate through a landfill  material signi-
    ficantly increases the establishment of active anaerobic
    microbial population within the fill.   The recircu1 ation of
    leachate increases the rate of biological  stabilization of
    the organic fraction of the refuse, as  evidenced by large
    reductions  in BOD and COD.
6.  The initial  and secondary rates of surface settlement of
    the landfill is greatly accelerated for the recycled
    leachate mode of operation.   The  ultimate settlement of the
    landfill is  thereby achieved much quicker for the recycled
    mode.
                                56

-------
 7.   Leachate  recircu1 ation  essentially  uses  the landfill  volume
     as  a  generally  uncontrolled  anaerobic digestor  for  effective
     anaerobic treatment  of  its  own  leachate*
 8.   Significant  advantages  can  be  gained  by  leachate  recircu!ation
     in  terms  of  leachate  control,  ultimate qua),sty  control  of
     leachate  and acceleration  of time frame  for alternate  use
     of  landfill  sites.
 9.   Seeding  of placed  refuse with  septic  tank  pumpings  without
     additional management accelerates acid fermentation processes,
     thereby  increasing  establishment  of anaerobic  mocrobial  activ-
     ity,  but  ultimately  appears  to  suppress  development of  vigorous
     methanogenic organisms,   in  the absence  of pH  control  of
     leachate  and recycling  of  leachate, seeding cannot  be
     recommended  as  beneficial  on the  basis of  this  study.
10.   Leachate  recircuI ation  is  the  most  feasible and most
     beneficial of  the  management procedures  utilized  In this
     study with respect  to rate  of  s tab ii I i zat ton of  refuse,,

 RECOMMENDATIONS  FOR FURTHER  STUDY
     Following are  a series  of  suggestions which would  yield
 useful  results and  insights  into specific areas of  landfill
 stabilization behavior,
 1.   Continue  low level  monitoring  of  leachate  quality  parameters
     on  all  cells.
 2.   Initiate  studies on  the  methodology of estimating  and  possibly
     predicting active  landfill  life during which significant
     amounts  of pollutants are  produced.
 3.   Utilize  Cells  A, B  and  D for studies  on  the rate  of gas  pro-
     duction,  feasibility  of  effective gas recovery  by  pumping
     and estimating  rate  of  gas  diffusion  through surface
     coverings,
 k.   Initiate  a study of  refuse  stabilization of Cell  E  by
     means of  leachate  rec«rcu1 at ion with  pH  control„
                            57

-------
                      IX - REFERENCES


Alexander, M. Microbial  Ecology. Wiley.  1971-

Anderson, J. R. and J. N. Dornbush.  "Influence of sanitary  land-
fill on groundwater quality".  American Water Works Association
Journal . 59, *»57, 1967.

Apgar, M. A. and D. Langmuir.  "Groundwater pollution potential
of a landfill above the water table".  Groundwater, 9_, 76, 1971.

APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-
water, 19th ed, 1971 .

California, State of,  Water Pollution Control Board.  Final  report
on the investigation of leaching from a sanitary landfill.
State Water Pollution  Control Board Publ. No. 10,  1951*.

Fungaroli, A. A. "Laboratory study of the behavior of a sanitary
landfill".  J. Water Pollution Control Federation, ^, 252,  1971.

Fungaroli, A. A. "Pollution of subsurface water by sanitary
landfills".  Vol. 1, Report SW-12rg, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1971 .

Gelger, R. The cl [mate near the ground.  Rev. ed. , Harvard Uni-
versity Press , i 965 .

Golueke, C. G. and  P.  H. HcGauhey.  Comprehensive studies of
solid waste management,  1st and 2nd Annual  Reports.  Public
Health Service Publication No. 2039, 1970.

Hughes, G. M., R. A. Landon, and R. N. Farvolden.  Hydrology
of solid waste disposal  sites in Northeastern Illinois.  Report
SW-l2d, Environmental  Protection Agency, 1971.

Leckie, J. 0. and R. 0.  James "Control mechanisms for trace
Petals in natural waters" in A.  J. Rubin, ed. Aqueous-Envi ron-
JPental Chemistry of Hetals.  Ann Arbor Science Publishers, \  n c ; .  -
Leckie, J. 0. and W. Stumm.  "Phosphate precipitation" in E. F.
Gloyna and W. W. Eckenfelder, eds. Advances in water quality
improvement - Physical and chemical processes , University of
Texas Press, 1970.

Mao, M. C-M. and F. G. Pohland.  "Continuing  investigations on
landfill stabilization with leachate rec i rcul at i on , neutraliza-
tion, and sludge seeding".  Special Research  Report, Georgia
Institute of Technology, School ofCivil Engineering. Sept., 1973
                                58

-------
McCarty, P. L. "Anaerobic treatment of soluble wastes".   in
E.  F.  Gloyna and W. W. Eckenfelder, eds. Advances In Water
Quality Improvement, University of Texas Press,1968.

McCarty, P. L. "Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals"
Public Works. 95, No. 9-12, 196A.

McCarty, P. L. "Energetics of organfc matter degradation".  W a t e r
Pollution Microbiology, R. Mitchell, ed..  I n te rs c i ence ,  1972.

McKinney, R. D. Microbiology for Sanitary Engineers, McGraw-
Hill,  1962.

National Center for Resource Recovery, Inc., Municipal Solid
Waste:  Its Volume, Composition and Value".  NCRR Bulletin,  III,
No, 2, k (1973).

Qasim, S. R. and J. C. "Leaching from simulated landfills".
Journal Water Pol 1 ut i on Con t ro T Federation,  *»2, 361, 1970.

Riehl, H. Introduction to the atmosphere. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill,
1972.

Singer, I. A. and R. M. Brown. "The annual variations of  sub-
soil temperatures about a 600-^foot circle".   Trans. Amer. Geo-
physical Union, 37, 7^3,  1956.

Strahler, A. M. and A. J. Strahler.  Environmental Geoscience.
Hamilton Publishing Co.,  1973.

Strahler, A. M.  The earth sciences, 2nd ed., Harper and  Row,
1971.
                             .........           v
Stumm, W. and J. J. Morgan.  'Aq'Ua't i c chemist r y, Wiley, 1970.
                              59

-------
TABLES

-------
                                                          TABLE  1


                                            LIQUID CONDITIONING AND  PURPOSE  OF  CELLS
CELL
DESIGNATION
A
B
C
D
E
INITIAL
L 1 QU 1 D
CONDITIONING
None
Field A
Capaci ty
None
None
Field ^
Capacity
L 1 QU 1 D
USED
None
Water
None
None
Septic
Tank
Pump ings
OPERATION
DAILY
LIQUID
APPLICATION
gal /day
None
None
700±
(200-1 000) **
1000±
(500-1000)**
None
LIQUID
USED
None
None
Water
Reci rcu-
lated
Leachate
None
PURPOSE OF CELL
Control Cell
To determine the effect of high initial
water content on refuse stabilization.
To determine the effect of continuous
water through flow on leachate character.
To determine the effect of continuous leachate
reclrculation on leachate character.
To determine the effect of high Initial
moisture content, using septic tank pump Ings,
on refuse stabilization.
o
N>
I
 ov1
           *   Field  capacity  is  the  condition when  a  sufficient  quantity of fluid  has  been  added  to the refuse

              to  cause  a  significant volume of  leachate  to  be  produced  from the  cell.

          ** Range of variation in daily application of fluid.

-------
                    TABU I

SUMMARY OF TYPICAL RANGES FOR VARIOUS LEACHATE PARAMETERS
PARAMETER
dng/1 unla».
othanrla* notec
AodtcAcld
Acidity
Alkalinity
Alttmnum
Araanlo
Barium
Batrllum
BOD
rWmlda
Butyric Acid
Cadmium
Calcium
Chloride
Chromium
COD
Copmer
Cyanide
riuotlde
LABORATORY STUDIES
1) CALIFORNIA W. VIRGINIA DREXEL GEORGIA TECH
0) C) (3) (4)
4,000-8,000
500-3,000 1,500-3,300
730-9,500 8.000-U.OOO 1,000-1,500




81-33,100 9,000-30,000 40-110

500-4, 500

HSr2,S70 600-3,000
»«-t,350 500-2,000 200-2,000 100-350

1, 000-40, OM 6,000-18,000
1-4.5


HanJne.l, Total (a.CaOOJ) 650-8,120 S, 000-12, 000 1,000-5,000 1,000-5,000
HBAS
Hrane Soluble.
1'Ofi, Farroue
m. Total
•ad
•lagne.lum
Manganaaa
rllokel
Hruooen, Total
Mltrogan, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Nitrogen, Oraanle
Featlcldaf (ppbl
•H
Pnoaphat*
Petaaatum
fraolanlc Add
Sejetilnm •
Sodium
Solid., Total
Sotlda, Uliaolvad
Solid., Suspended
Solid., Volatile
Sulphate
Tannin and Llardn
TOO
Valeric «old


2.0-93
6.5-305 100-800 100-1,400 0.02-24.0

64-410 100-400
0.05-1.66
0.01-0.9
400-2,000 30-400
i 0.22-890 300-1,000 JO-250

2.4-550 200-1,000 8-460 50-150
100-800
5.6-7.6 5.3-6.3 5.0-1.0 7.0
0.16-29 20-120 1-130 1.0-7.0
18-1,860 700-3, 500
2,000-5,000

85-1,805 300-1,200 200-3,800 '
18,000-50,000 5,000-40,000

5,000-25,000
10,000-28,000
39-730 200-800 50-400
300-1,000
3,000-5,000
30-1,800
Volatile .-\ctds, 'otal
Zlno
REFERENCES: 0)
0)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7;
1-120
State of California '1954'
Quaalm and Uurchlnal 0970)
Funaarell (1971!
Mao and Pohland 11973)
State of California H9S4)
Andaraon and !>orahu*h (1986)
Hughea, et. al. (1971)
FULD STUpHS THIS STUDY
CALIFORNIA S. DAKOTA ILLINOIS CELL A CELL C
(5) (6) (7)


255-1,125 24] 100-10,000 1, 000-8, 500 1,000-5,500
0.05-1.1
0.1-6.9
0.11-8.5
0.1
0.6-59 50-50,000 12,000-31,000 4,000-28,000
0.1-12

0.05
88-355 100-300 500-2,500 400-1,600
72-865 1.84 15-1,500 500-2,000 200-2,000
O.OS-0.2
10-50,000 15,000-55.000 4,000-40,000
0.05 0.15-0.7 0.02-0.6
0.005-0.024
0.05-0.89
305-1,175 301 lOft-10,000
0.01-0.5
0-350
0-4.0
0.07 0.2-5,000 700-1,100 tOO-300
0.5-1.3 0.1-1.8 0.1-0. 8
13-110 11-300 600-1,100 100-1,000


2.4-6.5
0.12-8.5 40-700 100-800
9.8 0.1-1,5 O.i-1 0.1-1
0-2.3 5-100 ' 10-900
5
6.85-7.78 7.31 6.5-8.5 4.5-5.2 4.4-5.3
0.01-1.6 0.5-7.0 . 1-15 1-40
4.4-190 0.16 t-790 200-900 70-800

0.1-2.7
67-710 10.2 50-1,200 80-900 100-950

200-13,000 12,000-26,000 3,000-20,000


25-700 25-800 150-800 100-800



10,000-19,000 3,000-12,000
0.05-40 0.2-60 0.6-42








CELL P


2,000-8,000




400-13,000



500-1,600
1,000-2,000

1,000-38,000
0.04-0.15






62-300
0.01-2.0
100-700



200-900
0,1-9
10-900

4.5-6.8
1-40
300-100


600-1,000

1,000-2?, 000


100-900



1,000-14,000
1.1!- 95







                  Reproduced  from
                  best available copy

-------
                                  TABLE 3



                      REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT SUMMARY


ITEM
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic, Rubber,
etc.
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Dirt, Rock
Fines
TOTAL
Random Sample
Combined Waste


A



LU
_l
00
<
_l
	 
-------
                                 TABLE 4



                        REFUSE COMPOSITION SUMMARY
ITEM
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic* Rubber,
etc.
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Rock, Dirt
Fines
TOTAL
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEIGHT
CELL
A
8.8
10.8
35.5
4.2
1.1
1.3
8.0
9.1
5.8
15.1*
100.0
B
10.4
11. 1
44.5
5.2
1.4
1.2
9.9
9.8
1.0
5.5
100.0
C
12.8
5.8
42.4
5.1
2-5
0.6
8.8
11.5
3.6
6.9
100.0
D
9.7
7.4
45.3
it. 7
1.5
1.3
9.5
12.1*
1.0
7.2
100.0
E
12.0
17.0
35.2
4.0
1.9
o.4
8.6
11.5
2.8
6.5
100.0
Average of
All Cells
10.7
10. 4
40.6
4.6
V-7
1.0
9.0
10.9
2.8
8.3
100.0
Project 102-1.3
                                     64

-------
                               TABLE 5
                        COMPOSITION OF REFUSE
^NV SOURCE OF
\^ REFUSE
ITEM ^v
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic, Rubber,
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Dirt, Rock
Fines
TOTAL
WEIGHT PERCENTAGE
SONOMA COUNTY
TEST CELLS
CALIFORNIA
10.7
10. k
1»0.6
i».6
1.7
1.0
9.0
10.9
2.8
8.3
100.0
'SANTA CLARA
COUNTY (a)
CALIFORNIAV
12.0
9.0
50.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
7.0
7.0
100.0
CITY OF
BERKELEY (b)
CALIFORNIA
25.1
kk.S
2.2
1.1
-
8.7
11.3
7.1
100.0
DR. POHLAND
GA.INST. OF
TECH. -GEORGIA
25.0
0
50.0
3.0
5.0
1.0
*KO
7.0
5.0
0
100.0
(a)  Estimated breakdown of domestic waste.   Assumes a per capita
     production of 8 pounds per day of which kk% is domestic refuse.

(b)  Refuse segregated and weighed at Berkeley Waste Disposal  Site.
     Percentage figures are average of seven loads from districts
     established by Income level  and type of dwelling unit.

 *   Reference:  "Comprehensive Studies of Solid Waste Management"
                 First and Second Annual Reports.  C. G. Golueke &
                 P. H. McGauhey.   Public Health Service Pub. No. 2039,  1970.
 **             "Landfill  Stabilization with Leachate Recycle"
                 Frederick G.  Pohland, 3rd Annual Environmental  Engineering
                 & Science Conference, March 5-6, 1973, Louisville,  KY.
Project 102-1.3
65

-------
              TABLE 6
           CELL C.LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
6-20-72
7™11"72
7-25-72
8-8-72
8-23-72
9-7-72
9-20-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
11-30-72
12-19-72

PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.01
2.10
2.25
2.53
2.11
2.22
2.53
2.53
2.38
2.78
3.08
1.70
K89
2.61
2.69
1.76
1.97
3.01
3-33
3.65
2.56
3.41
2.84

BOD
0.45
0.42
0.37
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.55
0.52
0.41
0.56
0.54
0.42
0.71
0.54
0.66
0.60
0.66
0.57
0.70
0.38
0.38
0.54
0.38

CALCIUM
9.17
9.17
6.25
11.36
10.00
7-50
9.50
11.22
11.08
9.52
11.43
10.42
12.00
11.59
11.48
10.53
10.70
12.73
12.00
8.93
8.04
11.54
9.32

COD
0.33
0.28
0.31
0.41
0.33
0.32
0.39
0.41
0.40
0.49
0.39
0.32
0.43
0.41
0.41
0.37
0.40
0.42
0.43
0.32
0.28
0.43
0.34

CHLORIDE
9.17
9.82
9-09
11.79
9-90
10.23
11.05
13.58
13-17
17-54
15.09
15-63
17-56
16.98
16.67
18.58
11.30
14.74
19.46
7.69
14.52
21.13
10.04

MAGNESIUM
14.47
22.00
18.18
30.49
22.22
20.00
21.11
27-50
44.32
45.45
40.00
34.09
37-50
28.63
36.08
37.97
41.22
36.36
40.00
30.12
14,06
41.10
-

POTASSIUM
-
-
11.83
-
-
10.75
-
14.67
-
17.86
-
15.63
18.95
15-87
-
17-65
-
21.54
20.00
14.71
16.67
22.22
17-50

SODIUM
-
-
10.53
-
-
12.86
-
13-75
-
18.18
-
15.76
15-38
19.21
-
19-23
-
16.67
12.68
14.71
13.64
18.75
16.67

SULPHATE
-
12.50
-
15.24
-
20.09
-
24.55
-
29.41
-
-
- •
-
-
45.80
-
-
-
-
-
52.63
-

TDS
0.72
0.57
0.54
0.69
0.61
0.67
0.79
0.91
0.79
0.99
0.87
0.80
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.88
0.85
0.84
0.91
0.73
0.69
0.98
0.80


-------
              TABLE 6  cont'd
           CELL C LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVI TV/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-2*1-73
5-15-73
6-5-73
6-26-73
7-17-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
.11-20-73
12-11-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74

PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.81
2.68
1.53
2.24
2.30
1.40
0.95
1.43
1.51
1.63
1.30
1.19
2.33
1.69
1.50
1.06
1-93
1.47
0.57
0.73
0.59
0.90
2.02

BOD
0.51
0.40
0.28
0.34
0.50
0.23
0.17
0.21
0.30
0.35
0.25
0.19
0.41
0.27
0.25
. 0.25
0.39
0.28
0.26
0.49
0.17
0.44
-

CALCIUM
9.95
8.75
6.04
6.06
7-93
5.18
3.12
4.87
4.93
5.76
5.69
5.45
7.93
6.38
5.24
5.00
6.75
5.50
4.67
4.98
2.49
7.61
12.45

COD
0.41
0.32
0.24
0.26
0.34
0.22
0.13
0.18
0.20
0.24
0.21
0.19
0.33
0.23
0.22
0.21
0.29
0.21
0.19
0.24
0.12
0.30
-

CHLORIDE
18.97
19-09
5.51
8.15
18.59
7-51
7.32
6.44
7.48
7.06
12.35
10.67
26.42
14.29
16.80
14.40
20.77
4.74
1.07
3-39
1.37
1.13
15.31

MAGNESIUM
46.61^
17-50
25-00
23.40
37.76
21.15
13.89
19.90
21.59
26.66
23.84
18.82
35.00
24.44
27-63
22.50
32.93
20.00
21.43
24.39
12.78
27.16
27.27

POTASSIUM
26.70
18.83
13.30
16.50
22.24
13.33
7.89
12.34
14.84
-
16.66
17-86
25.45
-
19.09
-
34.62
15.38
6.67
-
9.49
-
39.47

SODIUM
22.00
13.82
11.15
12.13
15.90
9-32
5-95
8.55
7.42
-
9-07
7.17
12.73
-
12.65
-
15-00
-
8.15
-
6.71 .
-
19-48

SULPHATE
-
-
-
-
30.72
-
-
-
33.93
-
32.54
-
_
-
29.17
-
-
-
11.36
-
-
-
-

TDS
0.88
0.81
0.55
0.61
0.79
0.48
0.30
0.41
0.46
0.56
0.49
0.42
0.62
0.48
0.56
0.50
0.72
0.46
0.42
0.52
0.34
0.71
1.06


-------
                                                                TABLE 6 cont'd
                                                             CELL  C  LEACHATE

                                                  ELECTROHTONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RAT I OS
DATE
3-28-74
4-17-74



Peiii6d ;:
...AvfeVafes „•
•*T -n jfci ' ' " -
m-& to
M?3i to
ffiSfc*.
J52M13
•piptTto"
4-442—
V2F73 to
8-7-73
terav
I-4-7* to
4- 17-74




Data Point!
Mean
Std. Dev.


PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
0.89
2.61


'
'. --!: ''-
• .. '•'' '
2.10
2.50
•••Cj*2;.J2-r
3..10*
1.85
1.57
1.37
1.29




48
2.03
±0.76


BOO
-
0.73



'^''" - .

0.^3-%.
0.50
0.62
1K48 "
0.32
0.29
0.28
0.46




46
0.42
±0.15


CALCIUM
12.14
10.63



.i--*:** " ' '
, a.9i
10.53
•;ir.5i----
. 9-96".
6.18
5.77
5.59
8.38


too
-
0.43
. • •

CHLORIDE
17-35
4.35 .
e

MAGNESIUM
19.43
41.72


POTASSIUM
-
45.33


, STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF DATA
Mean. V aides for 18-Week Time Periods
.... - •£••-•• * _ -;.. /*"••; % . J
0.33 .
1-; o^4o"
0.-4l-^
0.37 . .,.
0.25 "
0.23
0.23
0.27


JO. 00 '-'
«^-3«b.«
^15,97 •
,15.30
"fi.03:
11.74
11.97
7-15


i 2^23
35.41
^34.29-
1 34^8 ';
25>12
24 . 30
24.83
25.46


11.29
16.05
I8.m.
19.63
15-35
17-45
18.94
31.43


SODIUM
-
26.15



11. 70^
1.5.90 =
17.62,
• 16.41
11.38
8.99
11.93
17.45


Mean Values and Standard Deviations for Total Study Period
48
8.35
±2.79


46
0.31
±0.09


48
12.19
±5.83


47
27.99
±9-33


33
18.54
±8.26


32
13.79
±4.78


SULPHATE

16.75





15.94
26.98
.45.80
52.63
30.72
33-19
20.27
16.75




13
27.28
±12.46


TDS
0.96
1.07





0.63.
0.86
0.9J
0 . 83 -
0.59
0.49
0.52
0.78




48
0.70
±0.20


OS
oo

-------
              TABLE  7

           CELL D LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
6-20-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
8-23-72
9-7-72
9-20-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
11-30-72
12-13-72

PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
3-93
2.47
1.88
2.02
1.98
2.02
1.91
2.27
2.18
2.24
2.83
2.00
1.90
1.88
2.53
1.65
1.75
-
3.44
2.04
1.96
2.55
2.31

800
0.59
0.53
0.41
' 0.50
0.44
0.46
0.45
0.54
0.36
0.42
0.39
0.50
0.61
0.60
0.71
0.60
0.62
0.54
0.62
0.39
0.36
0.44
0.37

CALCIUM
7.69
8.46
6.43
10.00
7-69
11.11
9.00
12.50
9-38
7.22
10.62
9-85
10.59
10.07
10.86
9.42
9-79
9.99
11.23
7.52 _^
6.25
8.86
6.95

COD
0.13
0.42
0.30
0.40
0.31
0.31
0.29
0.37
0.34
0.38
0.38
0.37
0.41
0.51
0.44
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.44
0.30
0.26
0.35
0.36

CHLORIDE
9.92
10.68
9.18
11.76
9.80
10.87
8.82
11.47
11.19
12.38
11.59
12.62
14.02
13-43
14.21
12.04
11.20
12.08
12.92
9.09
5.92
7.69
6.23

MAGNESIUM
21.43
22.00
18.00
26.67
20.00
16.67
16.36
25.00
33.8?
30.95
30.36
26.00
22.87
28.43
28.41
26.26
25-69
24.65
30.51
17.86
14.29
20.69
-

POTASSIUM
13.19
-
12.16
-
-
13.75
-
17-19
-
17.10
-
16.25
18.07
18.59
-
17.57
-
18.67
19.38
13.16
12.33
17.39
16.70

SODIUM
12.24
-
10.00
-
-
11.63
-
12.25
-
13.68
-
14.77
15.89
14.36
-
14.64
-
14.58
15-35
10.99
11.25
13.64
11.50

SULPHATE
-
10.58
-
13.04 y
-
12.59
-
13-59
-
14.32
.
-
-
-
-
21.67
-
-
-
-
-
25-70
-

TDS
0.57
0.77
0.55
0.75
0.59
0.62
0.59
0.77
0.68
0.89
0.73
0.61
0.81
0.77
0.74
0.69
0.69
0.72
0.91
0.59
0.52
0.69
0.65


-------
                                                                 TABLE  7 cont'd
                                                              CELL  D  LEACHATE

                                                    ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER  RATIOS
DATE
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-5-73
6-26-73
7-17-73
8-7-73
4-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-11-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74

PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.78
2.04
1.46
-
1.42
1.10
1.36
\.22
1.06
1.43
1.27
1.13
1.43
1.56
0.89
0.93
1.95
1.43
0.88
0.82
0.39
1.58
2.26

BOO
0.47
0.33
0.37
' 0.33
0.34
0.28
0.25
0.25
0.30
0.38
0.36
0.26
0.54
0.59
0.47
0.95
2.71
1.88
2.10
2.31
1.50
6.36
6.67

CALCIUM
8.59
8.94
12.03
5.30
5.00
4.33
4.33
3.75
3-94
5.55
5-92
6.23
8.61
11.61
7.00
8.75
16.12
9.36
7-31
6.79
3-73
17-81
22.16

COD
0.41
0.28
0.21
0.23
0.24
0.20
0.21
0.21
0.19
0.26
0.26
-
0.40
0.56
0.47
0.77
1.81
1.01
1.24
1.28
1.13
5.18
6.59

CHLORIDE
10.43
8.10
5.98
5-71
5.30
4.35
5-38
5.17
3.31
3.83
4.89
4.94
5.71
6.75
4.09
4.36
8.94
6.65
2.05
3.01
1.14
2.93
4.08

MAGNESIUM
21.88
15.58
11.72
11.00
18.04
9.80
10.79
9.93
7.14
11.36
17.72
9.51
13-27
15.65
9.85
11.41
23-33
17.86
12.75
9.46
4.66
26.52
29.20

POTASSIUM
18.67
11.62
9.12
10.94
11.48
8.82
9.84
9.38
17.14
-
21.54
11.33
11.76
-
7-65
-
19.76
13-95
10.73
-
3.80
-
22.73

SODIUM
14.05
9.60
7.27
7-38
7.88
6.64
6.82
7.00
, 5.45
-
13.73
6.51
7.65
-
5.54
- -
10.91
-
6.57
-
2.33
-
14.55

SULPHATE
-
-
-
-
15.91
-
-
-
15.19
-
21.79
• -
. -
-
47.56
-
-
-
36.07
-
-
-
-

TDS
0.72
0.52
0.40
0.43
0.41
0.34
0.35
0.35
0.31
0.40
0.38
0.37
0.49
0.63
0.77
0.55
1.24
0.77
0.68
0.55
0.30
1.36
1.71

-•J
o

-------
              TABLE 7 cont'd
           CELL D LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
3-28-74
4-17-74



Period
Averages
qpg to
mil to
7-25-72 to
10-11-7?
°7fe?2t°
tfcH <°
4=24-73 to
8-7-73
8-29-73 to
12-T1-7T
J -4- 74 to
4-17-74




Data Points
Mean
Std. Dev.


PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.90
2.30





2.38
2.24
2.53
2.51
1.48
1.26
1.27
1.71




46
1.86
. ±0.70


BOO
15.58
23.66





0.49
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.32
0.35
1.45
9-35




38*
0.45*
±0.12*


CALCIUM
16.49
-



8.56
9.76
8.23
8.23
6.66
5.67
10.03
13.40


COD
7-89
9.47


CHLORIDE
-
7.67


MAGNESIUM
18.79
20.00


POTASSIUM
-
22.52


STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF DATA
Mean Values for 18-Week Time Periods
0.31
0.36
0.42
0.35
0.23
0.26
0.98
5.26


10.37
11.35
12.83
8.71
5.80
4.64
5.47
3.77


20.80
27.10
26.05
21.05
12.82
11.49
15.14
18.11


13-03
16.85
18.23
16.27
10.30
14.23
13.02
16.35


SODIUM
-
12.50



11.29
12.52
14.87
12.79
7.60
8.07
7.67
9-73


Mean Values and Standard Deviations for Total Study Period
47
8.96
±3.71


37*
*
0.31
±0.10


47
7.qq
±3-58


48
20.01
±10.08


34
14.54
±4.58


33
10.58
±3.61


SULPHATE
-
12.91





12.07
13.50
21.67
25.70
15.91
18.49
41.82
12.91




13
20.07
±10.85


TDS
1.29
1.63





0.64
0.71
0.74
0.68
0.41
0.38
0.77
1.14




48
0.68
±0.31


* Data from 10/9/73 on is not included in calculation of mean and standard deviation.

-------
                               TABLE  8
                    COMPANION THERMISTOR COMPARISON
DATE
12-2-71
12-3-71
12-6-71
12-7-71
12-8-71
12-9-71
12-10-71
12-14-71
12-15-71
12-16-71
12-17-71
12-20-71
12-28-71
12-29-71
1-27-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
TEMPERATURE - ° C
Thermistor Inside
Top Gas Probe
Cell B
22.2
21.0
20.9
21.7
21.7
22.7
22.6
25.6
21.3
21.3
21.2
20.9 *
20.0
19.8
17,2
15.9
16.9
17.5
17.5
17.6
18.8
20.0
21.1
Thermistor Outside
Top Gas Probe
Cell B
22.2
21.1
20.8
21.7
21.8
22.7
22.6
25.6
21.2
21.1
21.0
20.9
20.1
20.1
16.7
15.6
16.8
17.4
17.4
17-5
18.7
20.0
21.1
Project 102-1.3
                                  72

-------
TABLE 9
-o
o
1 — .
o
~ ITEM
o
i 1 . Experimental
setup.
V"°


2. Fill used.




3. Depth of
refuse.
U>
k. Total water
appl ied.
5. Total leachate
produced.

6. Duration of
study.
7. Number of
samples
analyzed.
8. Controlled
parameter.
9. Reference

LEACHATE LABORATORY STUDIES
CALIFORNIA STUDIES

Wooden bin (8x^x12')
used at landf il 1 site
and covered with soil.


Fresh domestic rubbish
excluding cans, bottles
cardboard boxes and
large pieces of miscel-
laneous material .
10 feet
18.7 inches

6.2 inches (k\Q gal.)


216 days

35


Appl ied water.

State of Cal ifornia
(1952).
W. VIRGINIA STUDIES DREXEL STUDIES GEORGIA TECH STUDIES

Concrete cylinders Laboratory lysimeter: Corrugated steel pipe
3 feet in diameter. 6x6xlA feet. 36 inches in diameter,
Height: A. *» feet 1A feet in height.
B. 8 feet
C. 12 feet
Municipal refuse ex- Municipal refuse. Simulated municipal
eluding metals, cans, refuse.
bottles, stones and
large pieces of wood.

A. 3.6 feet/. . .. 8 feet 10 feet
B. 7.6 feet(lnc1ud'"9
C. 11.6 feet covers)
70 inches

A. 37-33 inches
B. 31.32 inches
C. 20.36 inches
163 days 700 days 600 days

16


Applied water - fill Applied water.
depth.
Qasim and Burchinal Fungaroli (1971 a,b). Mao and Pohland (1973).
(1970).

-------
                                                       TABLE 10



                                                LEACHATE FIELD STUDIES
n
o
o
M
 I

1.




2.




3.




k.

5.

6.

7,-




8.

ITEM
Location of
landfill.



Type of fill
material.



Age of fjll
at end of
study.
:•...-

Mode of
col lection.
Duration of
study.
Frequency of
sampling.
In contact
with water
table?


Reference

CALIFORNIA STUDJES S. DAKOTA STUDIES PENNSYLVANIA STUDIES ILLINOIS STUDIES
Riverside, California. Brookings, S. Dakota. Centre County, Pennsyl- 1.
van! a. 2.
3-
k.
5.
Domestic and commercial Municipal refuse. Municipal refuse. 1.
refuse. Combustible material 2.
burned before filling. 3-
••••••• 4.
5.
k years 6 years 9 years 1 .
' '' .••-.-- ' 2.
3-
IK
5.
Wells Wells Suction lysi meters

2 years 6 months k years

12 samples/2 years 3~k weeks Monthly and bimonthly

Yes Y3es No




DuPage County
Winnetha
Elgin
Woodstock
Blackwell Forest Pr.
Municipal
Municipal
1*0% Mun., 60% Ind.
kO% Mun., 60% Ind.
Municipal
12 years
23 years
22 years
30 years
5 years
Wells

k years



1. No
2. Yes
3. No
k. Yes
5. Undetermined
State of California Andersen & Dornbush Apgar 6 Langmuir (1971). Hughes, et.al. (1971).
(195*0. (1966).


-------
                              TABLE 11
                           SOLUTION ANALYSIS
                              Silty Sand
Determination - mg/1
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sod i urn
PH
Time After Immersion
1 week
170
30
500
30
3-5
31
7.2
6 months
170
3^
500
23
1.85
32
7.7
1 year
168
48
600
29
17.0
34
8.8
2 years
133
32
450
13.3
16
28
-
                             Concrete Sand
Determination - mg/1
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
PH
Time After Immersion
1 week
170
28
500
31
2.2
31
7.2
6 months
170
36
500
23
1.75
31.6
7.9
1 year
168
32
500
28
1.8
32
8.7
2 years
51
6.4
220
1.9
1.1
34
-
                              Pea Gravel
Determination - mg/1
Alkal inity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sod i urn
PH
Time After Immersion
1 week
180
33
480
26
1.9
31
7-3
6 months
190
54
550
16
1.95
29.6
7-3
1 year
190
40
460
25
2.0
31
9.2
2 years
133
38.5
310
12
1.2
30
—
Project 102-1.3
                                   75
PLATE H-22A

-------
                                TABLE 12
             WEIGHT, DENSITY, AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF REFUSE
               PLACED IN TEST CELLS BEFORE MOISTURE ADDED
Test Cell Refuse Placed
A 530.35
B 521*. 23
c 521.72
D 530.97
E 521.93
Density After Original
Compaction Moisture Content
lb./yd.3 % wet wt.
1064
1052
1064
1065
1047
WEIGHT, DENSITY, AND MOI
PLACED IN
Total Weight of
Water Per Unit
Volume After
Test Cell Moisture Added
Ib./yd.-*
B 630.43
E 1*73.77
TEST CELLS
28.4
27-3
25.6
22.7
23.5
STURE CONTENT OF REFUSE
AFTER MOISTURE ADDED
Total1 Weight Percent Water
Per yd. ^ After After Moisture
, Moisture Added Added
1395
1274
.23 45.18
.72 - 37.17
Weight of Water
lb./yd.3
302.18
287.20
272.38
241.76
246.05









Differential
Percent Due to
Moisture Added
+17.88
•H3.67


Project 102-1.3
76

-------
                                 TABLE 13




                  TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE




                               CELLS A, B, & E
CELL A
Date
2-15-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
11-21-72
4-10-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-22-74
3-6-74
4-17-74
CELL B
1-3-72
10-24-72
3-13-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-22-74
3-6-74
4-17-74
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
ND
ND
0.16
0.15
0.22
0.60
0.27
0.46
1.08
0.668
3.6
0.29
0.18
0.14
0.15
0.18
0.205
0.116
Zn
2.1
0.23
0.58
9-0
3.0
78.0
64.0
57.0
32.0
60.0
140.0
62.0
10.8
73.0
73-0
61.0
80.0
63.0
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.05
< 0.05
0.072
0.044
0.057
ND
0.19
ND
0.09
0.08
0.073
0.049
0.065
Hg
0.0006
0.0034
0.0078
0.0124
0.0014
0.0092
0
0.045
<0.001
0.021
0.006
0.0056
0.0044
0
0
0.075
•C0.001
0.016
Pb
ND
0.16
0.12
0.44
1.81
0.86
1.0
0.33
0.27
0.408
3.0
0.95
0.33
0.86
1.0
0.45
0.27
0.488
   ND - Not detected
Project 102-1 .3
77

-------
                           TABLE 13 -Continued
                 TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS  IN LEACHATE
                             CELLS A, B, £ E
CELL E
Date
2-15-72
10-24-72
1-23-73
3-13-73
4-24-73
6-5-73
6-26-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-22-74
3-6-74
4-17-74
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
ND
0.12
0.10
0.19
0.32
0.10
0.10
-
-
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.22
0.09
0.17
0.372
Zn
ND
1.67
41.0
5.6
64.0
58.0
61.0
32.5
-
62.0
68 .,0
18.0
18.5
70.8
109.0
50.0
Cd
-
0.09
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
*0.05
CO. 05
-
*b.i
<:o.o5
*o. 05
0.07
0.073
0.070
0.068
Hg
0.0005
0.0172
0.0144
0.010
0.006
-
0.0174

-
-
0.0084
0.0144
0.07
0.05
< 0.001
0.024
Pb
N
0.60
0.60
0.45
0.21
0.42
0.73
0.69
-
0.54
£0.2
0.65
1 .0
0.38
0.62
0.50
  ND - Not detected
     - No analysis made
Project 102-1.3
78

-------
                                TABLE 1*




                  TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE




                                 CELL C
Date

3-2-72
4-11-72
5-9-72
6-6-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
0.6
ND
ND
0.15
0.15
0.18
0.13
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.11
0.1
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.02
Zn
42.0
30.0
30.0
22.0
13.0
10.0
9.5
7.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
8.0
4.6
4.5
4.3
2.8
3-5
3.8
2.5
0.6
Cd
ND
ND
ND
0.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.06
0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
0.05
<0.05
Hg
0.0014
0.0016
0.015
0.0102
0.0005
-
0.0175
0.0068
0.005
-
0.0034
-
0.0076
0.0209
0.0071
-
0.0038
0.0084
0.0048
0.0002
Pb
ND
ND
ND
0.8
ND
0.1
0.2
0.22
0.15
0.35
0.15
0.17
ND
ND
0.1
-
0.1
0.1
ND
Tr.
Project 102-1.3
                                   79

-------
                            TABLE  14 -  Continued




                  TRACE  METAL CONCENTRATIONS  IN LEACHATE




                                  CELL  C
Date
7-17-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-11-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74
3-28-74
4-17-74
5-7-74
5-28-74
Cu
0.05
0.04
-
0.11
0.23
0.15
0.18
0.08 :
. -
0.04
-
0.10
-
0.036
-
-
Zn
0.72
0.8
-
0.7
-
0.6
1.8
0;6
-
1.7
-
0.33
-
0.5
- .
-
Cd
<0.05
<0.05
-
<0.05
<0.05
4.0.05
0.05
0
-
0.01
• •.•
0.013
-
< 0.006
-
-
Hg
-
0
-
-
-
0
0
0
- •
0.01
.
0.001
-
0.006
-
-
Pb
40.1
0
-
0.2
0
^0.2
0.24
0
-
0.07
.
<-0.01
-
0.096
-
-
Project 102-1.3
                                   80

-------
                                TABLE  15
                 TRACE  METAL  CONCENTRATIONS  IN  LEACHATE
                                 CELL  D
ELEMENT - mg/1
DATE
1-18-72
3-2-72
4-11-72
5-9-72
4
6-6-72 .
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
Cu
0.4
ND
ND
ND

0.1
0.15
0.16
0.14
0.15
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.32
0.29
0.08
0.11
0.12
0.09
0.12
0.08
0.06
0.01*
0.08
Zn
95.0
40.0
40.0
30.0

30.0
28.0
28.0
-
21.5
29-5
28.5
27.5
25.0
21.0
22.5
17.8
17.6
16.9
17.5
14.0
15.0
12.0
8.5
Cd
0.1
ND
ND
ND

0.13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.16
0.09
0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
0.05
<0.05
Hg
0.003
0.0058
0.0028
0.0066

0.0052
0.0045
-
0.0095
0.005
0.005
-
0.0008
-
0.011
0.0156
0.0076
0.0209
0.0084
0.0016
0.002
0.0016
0.0022
0
Pb
2.0
ND
1.0
ND

0.5
0.18
0.35
0.64
0.36
0.59
0.47
0.32
0.37
0.43
0.40
0.23
0.46
0.24
-
0.1
0.5
ND
0.31
  ND - Not detected
     - No analys i s made
Project 102-1.3
                                81

-------
                           TABLE 15  - Continued




                  TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS  IN LEACHATE




                                  CELL D
ELEMENT - mg/1
DATE
7-17-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74
3-28-74
4-17-74
5-7-74
5-28-74
Cu
0.08
0.05
-
0.09
-
0.12
0.28
0.08
-
0.03
.
0.045
-
0.055
-
-
Zn
17.5
3-5
-
4.5
-
3.0
3.2
2.4
-
1.6
-
•
-
1.12
-
-
Cd
*0.05
40.05
-
40.05
*0.05
•CO. 05
*.0.05
0
-
0.012
-
0.005
'-
0.017
-
-
Hg
.
0
-
-
-
0
0.004
0.0036
-
0.015
-
0.0011
-
0.041
-
-
Pb
<0.1
0.37
-
0.20
-
<0.2
0.24
0.53
-
0.13
-
<0.01
-
40.01
-
-
     No analysis made
Project 102-1.3

-------
FIGURES

-------
        MENDOCINO  COUNTY

                SONOMA
                                              X  NAPA  COUNTY
                    COUNTY
                               CENTRAL
                               DISPOSAL
                               SITE
                                             Q PETALUMA
        LEGEND
                CENTRAL SERVICE  AREA
                    LOCATION    MAP
(8- 71)
                                                 FIGURE  1

-------
           GNM
                         Date.
1-72
           .Checked By.
        Project M..mK«, 102-1.3   ri;«nt   Sonoma  County
                                    Sonoma County. Catlfornh
                                                            LEGEND
                                                                  Spring
                                                                  Landslide
                                                                  Merced  Formation
                                                             KJf  Franciscan  Formation
SCALE
                          GEOLOGIC   MAPf  CENTRAL  DISPOSAL  SITE

-------
oo
   *
    01

                                                                                    Trench  Location
                                                Scale 1-70
                                                                        EXPLORATION  MAP
                                                                                                FIGURE 3

-------
                                 Original Topograpfcy
                                 Field  Density Mtarminition
FIELD  DENSITY  TEST  LOCATION  MAP
                                                  FIGURE 4

-------
00
00

-------
                              I 1/2" 01 A. RV.C. PIPE
                                1/2" PERFORATED
                                  PVC.  PIPE
           SLOT


DISTRIBUTION PIPE  DETAIL
    NO SCALE
oo
           4 SUBORAIN
                                               PEA GRAVEL"

                                              SAND
                                                                                                SETTLEMENT MONUMENT
JL   i-'fAo'' t-'»
                                                                                               > NATIVE  CLAY
                                                                                                        DISTRIBUTION  PO»E
                                                                                                    —

                                                                                              A '.':';• *,t> DISTRIBUTION MEDIUM
                                                                                               '
                                                                                ..7
                                                                                 *
                                                                                                         Ctli;c> Sandy
                                                                                                         C«ll 0« P»« Grovel
                                                                                   CELL'C'a'D'  COVER  DETAIL
                                                                                          NO  SCALE
                                                                                    2" DISTRIBUTION
                                                                                     MANIFOLD
                                                                                                  CELL 'D'
                                                                                                                       4"5UBORAW
                                                     DETAIL OF LEACHATE COLLECTION PIPE
                                                           NO  SCALE
                                   SECTION'A-A1- TEST  CELL  SITE  PLAN  (AS BUILT)
                                                       60       80
                                             SCALE   IN  FEET
                                                                                  COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                              DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC  WORKS
                                                                               DONALD B. HEAD,    DIRECTOR
                                                                              SECTION 'A-A1 , TEST  CELL SITE
                                                                               PLAN (AS  BUILT)
                                                                                                 JULY  1972
                                                                                            SCALE AS SHOWN
                                                                                                    FIGURE   6

-------
      Tt»t  Ctll  Access  Road
              1,000  Gal.  Leochate
              I Distribution  Tank
               Flow Meter
6" Concrete  Pod
  Distribution
  r Lines  ^
  \       \

A_i
                                                                      -See Detail on  Figure 6
                                                                                                 _ Sampling Terminal
                                                                                               £ (Lysimeter, Gas, Thermister)
                     3/4  Leochate Return  Line
                                                                     _   S Thermister Probe*.. _
                                                                     Collection Line        T    3" PVC. Leochote
                                                                                         /Collection Pipe
                                                              SECTION    ' B - B'
                                                   TEST  CELL  SITE   PLAN   (AS   BUILT)
                                                           CELL 'D'   COMPONENTS
                                                                                                                          1,000   Gol.  Leochote
                                                                                                                          Collection  Tonk
                                                               10      20     35     40
                                                                SCALE IN  FEET
                                                                                                                    COUNTY  OF  SONOMA
                                                                                                              DEPARTMENT  OF PUBLIC WORKS
                                                                                                                DONALD  B. HEAD    DIRECTOR
                                                                                                                 TEST  CELL  SITE  PLAN
                                                                                                                        (AS  BUILT)
                                                                                                              JULY.  1972      SCALE  AS SHOWN

                                                                                                                FIGURE    7

-------
    •D
    O
    C

    O
    o
  to

  •o
  : I
  0 —
  o u
    41

   i o
  X ».
  a a.
P 1(8- 71>
                                              1200  feet to  Test  Cells
                             Top of  Existing Channel  Bank
                                                       J
                                   Piezometers
                                                                Flow Line

                                                                 of Existing

                                                                 Channel

         Sand

         Drainage

         Blanket
        6 inch

        Dia. CMP
        Perforated

        bottom 5
         Collection  Sump

         backfilled  with Pea Gravel
            CLAY   BARRIER    CROSS   SECTION

                          Scale:  Imch z  5  feet
                                      91
                                                                  FIGURE  8

-------
     II
     o
   V v.
   CD CL
Tl KB - 71)
                                          r—Typical  Cell
                                                  _L
                                     x5           i2
                                          PLAN
            Sampling Location  for
             Lysimeters, Gas Probes,
             and Thermisters
                             Typical   Identification  Symbols
                                            2 feet - Cover Thickness
Lysimeter  Located at
 2,4, a. 8 feet  Below
 Cell Bottom	
                    _
                                               Gas Probe  and T her mister
                                                 Located  at  1  foot above  Bottom(B),
                                                 Middle(M), & 1 foot  below Top(T)
                                                 of  Refuse.
                                        SECTION
                                        LEGEND
                      C-T
                      C-4
                   Cell 'C',  Top Probe
                   Cell 'C.  Lysimeter  4 feet
                    below Cell Bottom
J_
Settlement
Gas Probe
Lysimeter
Sampling Location
 Plate
& Thermister
         TYPICAL   INSTRUMENTATION   LOCATION
                           SCALE :  1 men =  20 feet
                                              92
                                                                     FIGURE   9

-------
                                                         •(13,770)
    10.000 -
                       1972
                          1973
JIFIM'AIM IJ
    1974
                                  TIME-MONTHS
                    ALKALINITY  OF LEACHATE
                                         FIGURE  10
                                                (22,100)
                                                             (21,960)
    20,000—
                                                                 (21,180)
A ! M ! J' J ' A1 S1 O1N ! D
    1972
                                                               1974
                                  TIME-MONTHS
          VOLATILE  ACID  CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE |  FIGURE 11
PROJECT 102-1.3
                                   93

-------
    70000—,
          1971
                                    1973
                                          1974
                                  TIME-MONTHS
            BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND  OF LEACHATE   I  FIGURE 12
    70,000-1
    60,000 —

 X
 I"  50,000
 I
 O
 UJ
 o
 UJ  3QOOO-
 X
 o
 4
 U
    20000 —
 5  10,000-
     •189,920)
NlQ
1971
IM< J'l jlAlslo'NlD!j'Fl|!|lAlM'jT7niT8I
   1972          '          1973
             TIME-MONTHS
                                                       l N! o
                                                               1974
PROJECT 102-1.3
   CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND OF LEACHATE    |  FIOURE.IS
                            94

-------
 V)
 Q
 O
 V>

 O
 LJ


 O
 CO
 V)
 <

 O
40JOOO—



38,000-



32,000-



2 8000—



24,000—



20.000—



I6JOOO—



12,000-



 8,000-



 4,000-



   0
           N1 0| J ' F iMiAlMl J ljlA'SlOlNlD]jlFfM'Al|«Tj'jlAlS'Ol N'oTj I F'M' A'M'

           1971  '          1972           '           1973          '     1974

                                     TIME-MONTHS
                TOTAL  DISSOLVED SOLIDS  IN  LEACHATE
                                                             FIGURE 14
 E
 o
 M
 O
     23.000—
     EO.OOO-
 t   15,000-
 o

 o

 §   10.000-
 o
  I
 o
 IE
 (J
 Ul
 3^)00-
           1971
                              A " S ' 0 '
                     1972
                                   J ' F IM I A i
1973
1974
                                     TIME-MONTHS
                ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY OF LEACHATE     |  FIGURE is
PROJECT 102-1.3
                                   95

-------
                                                                (1,892)
  01
  6
  I
 (E
 O
     2,500-
     2.000-
1,500-
I.OOO—
      500—
           NlDl J lMMTAlMlJljTAlSIOlNlD|jTF IMIA lMTjljlA'sTo'NlD| J I F 'MiAl

           1971 '          1972          I          1973          '    1974

                                   TIME-MONTHS
         CHLORIDE  CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
                                                               FIGURE 16
  I
 UJ
     1,400-1
     1,200-
     1,000-
      800 —
 Q[    600-
 _J

 
-------
           (8S.OI- -(79.2)
       50-
       40-
   JT   30-
   in
   o
  £
  U)
  o
       20-
       10-
                                 TIME-MONTHS
             PHOSPHATE  CONCENTRATION  OF LEACHATE   I  FIGURE is
      100—I
   I
  z


  UJ
      0.01
N'DJ'F'M'A'M'J'J'A'S'O'N'D

1971 '          1972
                                             1973
1974
                                 TIME-MONTHS
PROJECT 102-1.3
            NITRATE-N CONCENTRATION  OF LEACHATE   |  FIGURE 19
                                 97

-------
  D>
  I
  Z
  u
  (9
  o
  z
  o
     1,000-
      800-
600-
      400-
      200-
                                             1973
                                                        1974
                                 TIME-MONTHS
             AMMONIA-N  CONCENTRATION IN LEACHATE
                                                      FIGURE 20
o>
I
Z
UJ
o
cr
t-
z
o
z
  (T
  O
     1,000-
      100—
       10-
    N D J ' F ' M
    1971
                      ' J ' J ' A
                       1972
                                           1973
                                 TIME-MONTHS
                                                             (o)
                                                         /
1974
             ORGANIC-N  CONCENTRATION OF  LEACHATE
                                                      FIGURE 21
PROJECT 102-1.3
                                    93

-------

 a
 o
1,600-


1,400-


1,200-


1,000-


800-


600-


400—


200-
          1971
                  1972
                                    1973
                                  TIME-MONTHS
              SODIUM  CONCENTRATION  OF  LEACHATE
                             1974
                                                                     J I
                                                        FIGURE 22
N'D|J'F
1971
                       1972
        ATM'jiJ1A's'O'NID
            1973
TIME-MONTHS
                                                          1974
             POTASSIUM  CONCENTRATION  OF  LEACHATE    I  FIGURE 23
PROJECT  108-1.3
                                     99

-------
  I
 2
 3
 u
 _i
 <
 o
      3000—1
      2,500-
      2,000-
1,500-
      1,000—
      500-
           1971
                  1972
                                     1973
                                         1974
                                   TIME-MONTHS
              CALCIUM  CONCENTRATION  OF  LEACHATE
                                                         FIGURE 24
  o>
  E
  I

 2
 D
 (O
 UJ
 Z
 C9
      1,400—1
      1,200—
      1,000—
 800-
 600-
      400-
      200-
                       11 j » » • • 199* m• >«
N
-------
  c



  X
  o.
        7-
        6-
        5-
           1971
               J1FI
IAlMl J I JIA'SI O1NlD

     1972
                                                 10 INl
                                          1973
                 1974
                                   TIME-MONTHS
                           pH  OF LEACHATE
                                                          FIGURE 26
  E

  I
  z
  o
  o:
1,100-



1,000-




 900-



 800-



 700-



 600



 500-



 400-



 300



 200-



 100-



  0
           N'D

           (971
         J I F ' M1 A'M' J ' J ' A1 S' O1 N1 D
                   1972
1973
                                              1974
                                   TIME-MONTHS
                IRON  CONCENTRATION  OF LEACHATE
                                                          FIGURE 27
PROJECT 102-1.3
                                       101

-------
  o
  o
  Q.
  2
  IT
  O
  O
  O
  4
  O
  tu
  u.
       I08-
       io*H
       I03-
I02-
       10 -
          \B
          \
           \
                      NOTE: CURVES PLOTTED TO INDICATE TRENDS.
                           SEE APPENDIX H. FOR  INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS.
    N1 Dl J I MM I

    1971 '
iJjIjT,

 1972
   jip IMI AIM' ji ji A i s i o TN T D

             1973 .

TIME-MONTHS
                                                                  JIF!MlA'M1J

                                                                     1974
                FECAL  COLIFORM  COUNT IN  LEACHATE
                                                             FIGURE 28
   E
   O
   o

   X

   0.
  o
  o
  o
  o
  o
  (T
  I-
  v>

  -J
  4
  O
  UJ
I08-




I07-



I06-



I08-




I04-




I03-



I02-



10 -
                         NOTE: CURVES PLOTTED TO INDICATE TRENDS.
                             SEE APPENDIX' H. FOR INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS.
           1971
                   1972
             i j ] j i

             1973
                                             1974
                                      TIME-MONTHS
PROJECT 102-1.3
       FECAL  STREPTOCOCCI  COUNT  IN   LEACHATE     FIGURE  29
      ^W^^^^K


                                    102

-------
    Ul
    W
    u
    X
      4,000 --1
       3,000 -i
    V)
    z
    o
    -j  2,000 -
       I.OOO —
              N I D|J r F 1  M T A I M! J T 7 I A T S I OlNlDlJlFlMlAlMljIJlAlslolNlDljlFl
—12,000
                                                                                                                   r—9.000
-6,000
—3,000
                                                          TIME-MONTHS
                                    CUMULATIVE  LEACHATE  PRODUCTION-CELLS A, B 8 E
    FIGURE 30
PROJECT IO2-I.3

-------
 8
o
-r*
       800-






       70O-






       600-






    **.  500-



    O


    J  400H
    3  300
       200-





       100-
   O
   O!
WATER DISTRIBUTION
                       LEACHATE COLLECTION
                            J VA'S'O' N'DF J 'FTMTA 'M'J
1972
1973
                                                 1974
                                       TIME-MONTHS


         CUMMULATIVE WATER DISTRIBUTION  AND  LEACHATE  COLLECTION - CELL.V

-------
    Ul
    in
    UJ

    o
    z
                                                                                r^hrrTTTTT1	,  rr^fl
                                                                                : i ;•!•:!:"?• 11 .M i	
ui
u

•x>
V)
z
o
       10,000 -
        8,000 -
       6,000 -
       4,000 -
        2,000 -
               N  I D
                1971
Jl F I M I  A  I M I  J  I J I  A I  S  I 0 I  N I D I  J I
                  1972                   I
                                                                 Fl M (A  I M I  J  I J
                                                                                1973
FA  I S T 0  I N I  D I  J  I
Fl  M I A I  M I
    1974
                                                                                                          - 10,000
                                                                                                          -8.000
                                                                                                          -6.OOO
                                                                                                                                 - 4.OOO
                                                                                                          -2,000
                                                                 TIME-MONTHS
                                                          FLUID ROUTING-CELL "C
                                                                                                              FIGURE 32
PROJECT 102-1.3

-------
    Ul
    ilJ
    CO
    UJ
    u
      40.000 —
      30,000 —
    UJ
    Ul
    V> 20,000
    z
    o
       10,000 -
                 LEACHATE AND WATER,

                 DISTRIBUTED
NlD|jlFlMlAlM|jlj|AlslOlNlD|jlFlMlAlM|j|jlA IS  I 0 I N  I D
 1971  I     t              1972                  I                    1973


                                                TIME-MONTHS
                                                        FLUID ROUTING-CELL "D*
                                                                                                            I F I  M I A I  M
                                                                                                                 1974
                                                                                                              —40,000
                                                                                                              —30,000
                                                                                                               -20,000
                                                                                                              —10,000
                                                                                                                  FIGURE 33
PROJECT IO2-I.3

-------
o
o
 i
  0.
  2
  UJ
       40—1
       35-
       30-
       25-
       20—
     15-
        10—
        5-
                '•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE''
                                                    r—\
           N1 0

           1971
iFIMIA'M!jijiA'sio1Nio
         1972
                                                    ' S rOINID
                                              1973
1974
                                    TIME-MONTHS
          MIDDLE THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES-CELLS A-E" I  FIGURE 34
           • (43.9)
  o
  o
  CC
  ZJ
  Lkl
  Q.
       35-
       30-
       25-
       20-
        15-
        10-
        5-
                ''•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE-''
         N D
         1971
                  lw1 A'M' j' J T A1 S'O'N'DJJ 'F IM'A'M'J'J'
                         1972          '           1973
                                    TIME-MONTHS
1974
                                                        IUII
                THERMISTOR  TEMPERATURES - CELL "A1
                                                               FIGURE  35
PROJECT 102-1.3
                                    107

-------
   ui
   er
   <


   tlJ
   Q.
       40-1
       35-
       30-
       25-
       20-
        15—
        10-
        5-
                 MEAN AMHCNT AIR TEMPERATURE''
1971
1972
                                        1973
                                                                 1974
                                   TIME -MONTHS
        THERMISTOR  TEMPERATURES-CELL"B"
                                                                FIGURE 36
  u
  IE




  I

  UJ
       40—1
       35-
       30-
       25-
       20-
15-
       10-
    \
                WEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE
1*0


1971
1972
                                        1973
                                                                 1974
                                   TIME-MONTHS
                                                     llr-H
                THERMISTOR  TEMPERATURES -CELL"E
                                                      |  FIGURE 37
PROJECT 102-1.3
                                     108

-------
  u
  e
   I
  u
  a:
  a:
  LJ
  a.
  S
  UJ
       40-i
       35 -
       30-
29-
       20-
15 -
       10-
        5 -
             v  /
                 MEAN AMBIENT Al* TEMPERATURE'
N'Dlj'FlMlAlMljIj1

1971 '           1972
                                          I Ml AIM' JIJI A IS'0 IN I D
                                                 1973
                                                        jIF'M I A'M'j'

                                                           1974
                                    TIME-MONTHS
        THERMISTOR  TEMPERATURES-CELL"C"
                                                                 FIGURE 38
  o
  o
   I
  UJ
  ac
  UJ
       40-
       35 —
       30-
25-
       20-
       15-
       10 —
        5 -
                               ..TOP
                '•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE-"'
           N<0

           1971
        J'F'M1A1MTjlJ rA'S'0'N ' D
                  1972
                                      1973
1974
                                    TIME-MONTHS
               THERMISTOR  TEMPERATURES - CELL "D"
                                                          FIGURE 39
PROJECT 102-1.3
                                    109

-------
           lOO-i
            80 -
     111
     _J
     o
           6O -
     CO
                              SAMPLING LOCATIONS
                              C.R "A* - MMdl* Prob*
                              C«ll'B*-Middte Prota*
                              C«H'C'-Bottom Prob*
                              C«ll "D'-Top Prob«
                              C«»'E'-Mlddl. Prob*
I. Celt* A" Gos  Somplw CoNvcUd from
  Top Prob* Starting 12-11-73.
2. Ctll'C" and'O" Gas AnarfMs of 5-28-74
  Corrected for Atmospheric Contamination.
                         *   ,    .    .  *-j—*J—T~"   .      *T~~*r""**'"'*'T""?"1 .     .  "***•***••*•••      , "^*^     .  *— r—r-f---i»"-.*** .
                  NlD|jlFlMlAlMlj|j|AlslOlNlD|jlFlMlAiM|j|j|A!siolNlOij|FlM|AlMlJ
                   1971  I                       1972                       I                       1973                      I           1974
                                                                             TIME -MONTHS
                                                                         GAS  COMPOSITION
                                                                                             FIGURE 40
PROJECT 102-1.3

-------
m
o
O
to
i
       .1 -
   u.
    i
   5-

   UJ
   2S
   UJ
   I-
   UJ
   CO
       .4-
o
c

m

*
           •AVERAGE VALUE OF 5 SETTLEMENT
            PLATES PER CELL.
N 'D J 'F 'STA
1971
J1 J T AT S «OrN 'DTJTFTMfA'M'J'J'A'S'OTN
1972          '           1973
            TIME-MONTHS

  •AVERAGE CELL SETTLEMENT
                                                                 1974

-------
              APPENDIX A






FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY  TESTING
                IISL

-------
     l*-
      (C

     CJ
     4-
     c

     c
     u
      c


      0
     C/J



      I
  CO
   I
     O
     co
   I
   &  8
  O


  "3
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: FEET BORING NO. 1
Tor-
vane

1.0
1.0



liquid
limit

38
31




Plasticity
Index

21
014




Natural
Moisture
Content
Percent

12.8
15.6


15.7

Dry
Density
Lbs./Cu.Ft.






ft
Penet-
ration

4.5+
4.5+



HH
! P1
a O
2 	
s
n 	
IE
6 	
ft mm^^~
10 -y
J -
12 	
DESCRIPTION

%
P

%
%


(CL) Yellow Brown Sandy CLAY
with roots to 8 inches;
dry , hard .
(Damp, very stiff to hard)
(SC) Yellow Orange Clayey SAND
with trace of fine gravel
@ 4.0' ; moist, stiff.
(Firm)
(Mottled gray with gravel
to % inch in lense; very
moist)
(Blue-green, wet)
Bottom of Trench- 11.0 feet.

REMARKS: Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe .
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
* - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
Ff 1  (8-71(
                                                                                                        PLATE A-l'
                                                       113

-------
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Tor-
vane

1.0
0.9


Liquid
LMt
30


29

Plasticity
MM
15


15

Natural
Cantant
••rant
11.3


18.7

Dry
Dwnhy
lWCu.Ft.




•
*

4.5
3.5


I
Jt .
I

2
6
8
10
12
REMARKSi Trench excavated with Drott
FEET BORING NO. 2
]l
•MI
•••I
•>•
j
•*•
•••
«•
-^
MM
•MB
M
•MB
•M
•Ml
•C>«
OPO<
•••»
••••
••M
••••
i
•••••i
Z
•MM-
••«•
•••••
••••
••••
••••
••••
§
••MM
•MB*
••HB
••*•»
••M*
••^H
IB^V
••Ml
MBMK
•••Ml
•••>
••MB
MM*
DESCIIPTION
^
i
1
4


(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY
with roots to 8 inches;
dry, hard.
(Damp» very stiff)
(Yellow brown with trace of
fine gravel; grading damp
to moist, stiff)
(Mottled orange and gray)

(lense gravel to V)
Bottom of Trench - 11.5 feet.
Backhoe .
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
A - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
Ft I
                                                                                   PLATE A-2
                                               114

-------
     g
     o
     m
     CJ
     §
     o
     o
     o

     o
     to
   I
  00
   I
     +J
     c

     o
     CJ
     o
     c
     o
     to
     I
     D
     I

     CN

     O
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:

Tor-
vane



0.4







0.8



Liquid
limit















Plattklty
Indon






n







Natural
Molitur*
Content
P»rc«nt








19.9






Dry
D«ulty
lbf./Cu.Pt.














A
Peiwt-
raNen



4.5t







3.0


]
.i
1



2

,

6

8
10

12

FEET BORING NO. 3
o
*i







•^
•rrt


W



!







p"^
1


•^^B

~i

DESCRIPTION
'///

yfr
%

W
%
W/
%
^

y//
%

(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY;
grass roots to 8"; dry, hard
(Traces of fine gravel)
(Mottled orange; damp, very
stiff)
(Yellow brown, moist, stiff)
(More sand)

(Mottled orange and gray)




Bottom of Trench - 12.5 feet
DEii ADIfC.
a' Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
" - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
FE 1 (8-71|
                                                                                                    PLATE A-3
                                                    115

-------
     5,
     4-
     C
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: FEET SORING NO. 4








liquid
limit



30



rloitWty
Mu



17


1
Natural
Mebtur*
Content
torant



18.3

20.2

Dry
Oorally
U»./Cw.rV







*







1 »
o (5
*•••••••
2 	
*••••••••
MM*.
LL ••••••••
6 -&

±1
10 - —
E
DESCRIPTION
%
^
W
'/fa
^
%
%


(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY with
roots to 8"; dry, hard.
(Damp, very stiff)
1 (Mottled orange; moist,
stiff)
(Very moist)

(Yellow brown; moist, stiff)
Bottom of Trench - 9.5 feet

REMARK&
Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
* - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
ft 1 (»-7U
                                                                                          PLATE A-H
                                                   116

-------
      It
     ! - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
      •c


   xt
  co  a.
ft I (8-711
                                                          117
                                                                                                         PLATE  A-5

-------
MAJOR   DIVISIONS
OARSE GRAINED SOILS
ha 1/2 of Mil > no 2OO sin
More
         QRAVELS


      (Mar* Ikon 1/2 of
      coerce  1 roe lion >
      no. 4 sieve til*)
         SANDS
      (Mare than 1/2 of
       coart* fraction <
       no. 4 siave lit*)
SYMBOLS  TYPICAL   SOIL   DESCRIPTIONS
                           GW
              l reded gravels or gravel-send mlit«ree, little or ne flwt
   GP   I.V.4 Poorly graded grovels or gravel-sand miiturss, liltl* or M fine*
   6M
»l»» nevels, grovel-sond-wll mutarai
                                         grovel*. grovel-sond-eley mhrture*
                           SW  PM Well graded sands or grevally tends, littla or no fines
                           SP
   SM
                           sc
            Poorly graded sends or gravelly sands,  little or no fines
Silty sands, sand-sill miitures
            Clayey sands, sand- clay miitures
*»m
FINE GRAINED SOILS
on 1/2 of «oH< no.20O
[More
      SILTS a CLAYS


            <50
                           ML
            Inorganic silts and very fine sends, rock flour, silly or clayey
            fine sands or clayey sills with slight elasticity
            Inorganic clays of low to> medium plasticity, gravelly clays,

            sandy clays,  silly clays, lean clays
                                    Organic silts and organic silly cloys of low plasticity
     SJLTS, ft CLAYS


         LDSO
                                    Inorganic silts, micaceous or diolomaceous fine sandy or silly soils,
                                    elastic sills
  CH
                           OH
Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays
            Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silly clays,

            organic silts
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
  Pt
P»at and other highly organic tail*
                      CLASSIFICATION   CHART
                           (Unifmd Soil Classification System)
CLASSIFICATION
BOULDERS
COBBLES
GRAVEL
coart*
fin*
SAND
cocrsi
medium
fine
SILT & CLAY
RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES
US Standard
Sieve Size
Above 12"
12" to $'
$" lo No 4
•f to *M'
V4" 10 No. 4
No 4 4o No. 200
No 4 to No 10
No 10 to No 40
No. 40 to Ne. 200
Below No. 200
Grain Size
in Millimeters
Above 305
305 to 76.2
76.2 to 4.76
76.2 ioi9l
19.1 to 4.76
476 to Q074
476 lo 2 00
ZOOlo 0420
0420io0074
Below 0074
                                             o
                                             z
                                             at

                                             I
                                                              CL
                                                              ML SOL
                                                                       CH
                                                 -OH -
                                                   a
                                                 - MH.
                                                        M  JO   «0   50  SO  70  SO

                                                              LIQUID LIMIT


                                                      PLASTICITY   CHART
      GRAIN  SIZE   CHART

         METHOD   OF  SOIL  CLASSIFICATION
                                           118
                                                                              PLATE  A-6

-------
                      SUMMARY OF PERMEABILITY TESTS
TRENCH
  NO.
DEPTH
 ft.
DENSITY
  pcf
          PERMEABILITY
    @ 20"C
    cm/sec
                                                          ft./year
            2.5-3.0

                5.5

                U.O
             106.0

             112.U
6.6 x 10'8

2.3 x 10~7
                        3.1 x 10
                                -7
                             0.066

                             0.23

                             0.31
                       SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY
              TRENCH
               NO.
                  DEPTH
                   ft.
                      SPECIFIC
                      GRAVITY
                               2.5-3.0

                               4.5-5.0
                                     2.75

                                     2.58
Project 102-1.3
                                                 PLATE A-7

-------
                           PLASTICITY CHART
60
50
40
30
20
10
 7
 4
                                            CH

10      20     30      40     50     60
                     LIQUID LIMIT («)

                   PLASTICITY  DATA
                                                 70
80
90     100





Pro j ect
KEY
SYMBOL
€
e
•
o
XBk
T^O
*
HOLE
NO
1

2

<*
5
DEPTH
2.5-3.0
4.5-5.0
1.0-1.5
8.0-9.0
5.5
4.0
LIQUID
LIMIT
(')
38
31
30
29
30
39
PLASTICITY
INDEX
21
14
15
15
17
24
UNIFIED
SOIL
CLASSI-
FICATION
SYMBOL
CL
SC
CL
CL
CL
CL
L07-1.2






                                 120
                                                              PLATE A-8

-------
O
O
§
1
o
o
o
i
0
i
OJ
0
§
i
f
P
s1
o
CL
(0
m
j>
CD
c_
O
Doto || g^AD&TIOM TEST RESULTS ||
LL II 38
PL II 1 7
PI 21
WAT. tt/C 12.8
CLASSIF. SYM0 CL
SAMPLE MO. ]
DEPTH FT 2.5-3.0
HOLE NO. 1
25K3 <
IOO
00
CO
7C
«D
O)
SO
t-
X
tut

EL
SO
20
1C

31
17
14
15.6
sc
2
J». 5-5.0
1
-
-
-
15.7
SC
3
10.0-10.5
1
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS J
lacjiH 7KS isciiN eouitt. ®BIM. IMIW mm. goo






































































.._, 	















































	












































U 1 fSO
TTife^-

	 #^@—




ff 1 fed




U | C]
17 ^












»

















J7 S^OU
^U

1- 0 /\
L *j" J .U

w5 — =^




10.0-




i ^-^






























30
15
15
11.3
CL
1
1 .0-1 .5
2
29
l*j
15
18.7
CL
2
8.0-9.0
2
U9. OTAHOflQD SERIES
too so so 10














.•
.
-•
' ' 'U"'




—

/
/
_/ '
y x
~* — " ^r^"
_JL^
= — ' — (I 	
H



J * ^ — Cn




} ' f-J








."
. *


• ^)
s^
r #
^
S /


f'
/
/ A

\T- 	 1—
- ' /i ' - /
s X
^x

f
!

^
*
_ '
s~
\f
II




























1 1 "s »iuff .«S Si8??^'5
CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT inoa- PLASTIC)



.K
/
J


























.
.X
^jr
j^" ^"
jf^
T ^

S
S s
S j
,' /
/ X



/



• * *
J^*>*'
^^~
gX' ^^
— •^*J
*^ _x*

/ *"
_/" ^ '
•' ^
IX









	


















































0 .COT .950 I.
DIAMETER 0? PARTICLE tC] U

HOE J

. - •
-
-
-
19. 9

30
3
17
8.3
CL
1 l i
=F. 0-7-0
3
5-5
k
-
-
-
20.2
CL.
2
9.0
3^
TS^
2^
15- & 13.8
CL
1 2
i».0 8.5
A \ 5 5
SIEVE ANALYSIS
| CLEAR 06UAR2 OPENINGS
Q C 3/0" 3A>" 1- I/S" S" S° 0° 0


^fff^^
^^X
^X-*"""
"--^" J** '
X*' X
X
X








































CJ
9 2.
iLtmETEF
SAND
SaEDlUB ||
^-rMfce^^ff5"

. -""" xJ
^s*T *^
^










































	 	 	 __
0 4.
s
•••* W^- 	
x^, "*^
**"































i
1
K
8
























































•S 092

COAR3E |











I
8































	 J-
«




f




8


I


A
\
11 \
	 1 	 _ 
-------
                              COMPACTION  TEST
        130
        125
        120
     u
     o
     IT
     O
        115
        110
                               y
                                 7
                                   7
                                                ZERO AIR
                                               VOIDS CURVE
\
                                  10         15

                               MOISTURE CONTENT %
          20
     (O
     Z
    (t
    O
                                                ZERO AIR
                                               VOIDS CURVE
                              MOISTURE CONTENT
PROJECT NO.  102-1.3
                     SAMPLE NO.
                        1
                                                                   SAMPLE DEPTH

                                                                   2.5' - 3.0'
                  SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

                  Brown Sandy
                                                                 CLAY
                   SPECIFIC GRAVITY

                     2.78
                                                                  TEST DESIGNATION
                                                                 D1557-70
                    MAXIMUM  DRY
                   DENSITY •( PCf)

                    123.5
                                                                 OPTIMUM MOISTURE
                                                                    CONTENT, %

                                                                    12.0
                                                                   SAMPLE NO.
                                                                  SAMPLE  DEPTH
                                                                 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
                  SPECIFIC GRAVITY
                                                                 TEST DESIGNATION
                                                                   MAXIMUM DRY
                                                                   DENSITY  (PCf)
                                                                 OPTIMUM MOISTURE
                                                                    CONTENT, %
                                       122
                                                                       PLATE A-10

-------
         APPEND!X B
TEST CELL CONSTRUCTION DATA

-------
TABLE A


















i
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DATE
OF
TEST
1971
10-1
10-1
10-6
10-8
10-11
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
APPROX.
DEPTH
OF
FILL
(feet)
2.0
2.0
3.0
4.5
5.5
4.5
3.5
2.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
5.0
. 5.0
5.0
0.0
LOCATION
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
APPROX.
ELEVA-
TION
( (feet) )
297.0
297.0
298.0
299.5
300.5
300.5
• 301.5
302.5
303.0
304.0
304 . 0
303.0
277.5
277.0
278.0
275.5
275.0
276.. 5
278.0
FIELD
DRY
DENSITY
(pcfl)
113.0
115.5
110.0
118.0
110.0
115.0
113.0
119.5
106.0
114.0
115.2
109.0
121.2
113.2
110.2
115.0
111.0
108.0
110.5
WATER
CONTENT
(%)
13.0
13.6
13.5
15.0
15.6
18.6
19.2
11.3
21.2
17.1
19.5
19.2
11.7
18.8
16.2
10.9
17.1
20.8
14.0
MAXIMUM
LAB
DRY
DENSITY
(pcf)l
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
.114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
RELA-
TIVE
COM-
PACTION
(%)
99.0
101.5
96.5
103.5
97.0
102.0
99.0
105.0
93.0
100.0
101.0
96.0
106.0
99.5
97.0
101.0
97.5
94.5
97.0
REMARKS
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Re -worked 6
Accepted
Cells A & E
PROJECT NO. 102-1.3



















124
PLATE B-l

-------
                                               TEST
         120
         115
      u
      a.
2  no
u
o
     tr
     o
         105
        100
                                         \
                                            \
                                                 ZERO AIR

                                                VOIDS  CURVE
                      10
                             15          20          25


                           MOISTURE CONTENT - %
     (T

     O
                                                 ZERO AIR

                                                VOIDS CURVE
                               MOISTURE CONTENT
PROJECT NO. 102-1.3
                                                                SAMPLE NO.

                                                               Stockpile
                                                                     SAMPLE  DEPTH
                                                             SAMPLE DESCRIPTION


                                                              Brown clayey
                                                                   fine SAND
                                                                    SPECIFIC GRAVITY


                                                                    2.75 (est.)
                                                              TEST DESIGNATION



                                                               D 698-70
                                                               MAXIMUM DRY

                                                               DENSITY '( PCf)


                                                                 im.o
                                                                   OPTIMUM MOISTURE

                                                                     CONTENT, %


                                                                       16.3
                                                                     SAMPLE NO.
                                                                    SAMPLE DEPTH
                                                                  SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
                                                                   SPECIFIC GRAVITY
                                                                   TEST  DESIGNATION
                                                                     MAXIMUM DRY

                                                                    DENSITY  (pcf)
                                                                   OPTIMUM MOISTURE

                                                                     CONTENT, %
                                          125
                                                                    PLATE  B-2

-------
iTnDLL 	 	 	 	 	
F"1
o
o
I
Z
o
o
M
CC


O
'J


T?
<>
KADATION TEST RESULTS J
LL
PL
PI
NAT W/C
CLASSiF SYMB.
SAMPLE; NO. ("c§a^te
DEPTH FT
HOLE NO. .Kaiser •
100
9C
»0
1
K-
."^
a
so
so
10
o
_. --
,.„„_ :;,.
g
 J
I/
//
J
r» » •*
7 5
R Or PART
RO JEHIC3
9 1
1
* f
f
\ 	
^^^ '
O 1.
OLE IN M
1
f









S
a
^ — --1
9 2
ILLIMETEf
(EVE Al
t
s^~ '*
*~ -•/
't 1
1
j
•*-«»/ —
-f 	
j
f
1
-j- —
i ' i
8 t.
S
SAND
fINE KCOlUM
COA93E









4ALYS1S
s/
— *•"
L imi r
Srare
s
9
CLt
a" s/<
of Fi
of La
o
•Z ><
AR
If
O
.1









30UAR
1- 1
-Wqy
forn
3
: OPENINGS
n" >
a 1971
^ 8 k S
\- rt
GRAVEL
FIKC
CC«»5E








	 1—
	 1—
	 -f—
i
	 U
1 	 (—
	 -i- 1
1 	 1-.-
	 1—
	 u-
i
	 h
	 -r
	 U
	 1 —
	 1—
' M -i
DOO |
2 «r i
' R
i
i
COBBLES
O
O
X)
Q
UJ
U
E
ao
1 §8838
[ PERCENT

-------

















^

>
CD
t
.*
V
V
f
c






CM
N
i

«
c
O








z
•2.
O

CO
8-












c
o
'o
\t
0
_J








>,
+^
c
O
0
™
E
o
L:
O
t/)

c
ft
*~
u



n
*T
C\J
O
t
.0
E
3
z
u
'o
CL
71)
/
/
^*-^
\ , y^
S ' /
\ /
^ /
\ x

1. 83 1.67 2.50 2.00 1.92 2.(58
1
1
1
2*17 2^7 2^3 2*Ss 2^)0 2.(83
I
1
1
" * " x x •* x i
2.jOO 1.75 2.58 2.50 1i67 2.|42
I I
I I
'l ' I
« x x x x Jc
2.M7 2.33 • 2.25 -2.83 2.67 2.125
I
1 1
1
. 1
1 '
1 1
"k x x x x i
2.|08 2.08 2.42 2.25 2.58 2^00
1 |
1 .1
1 |

1 • t
, 4.
/1.92 2.25 1.83 2.50 2.17 1.67\
. s.
/ \
. • V
' ^
/ \
/ \
' \



CELL 'A'

COVER THICKNESS SN FEET



SCALE : 1 inch = 1O feet
(
t















































127
                                  PLATE   B-4

-------











c
o
0
w
o
^


^
^
X

jt
s
»>
*^
c
0
O
m
E
0
c
 'c
•_ f
o —
0 U

PI
T'
CM
o
».
11
-0
E
3
Z z
z
O u
t>
'o
CD A.
(B-71)

\ ' . .
\
\
, \
\
\
\

1.*90 195 1&5 195
1*95 2.OO 2^5O 2^2O



* X X X
1j90 2. 2O 2.55 230
I ,
I . . {.»
1
2JOO 2^20 250 2^90
1
1
1
1
ik x x x_
1.|75 2.OO 2.35 2>5
|
1
1
1
• V M" U
/1.45 1.85 2.30 2.50
*


'
s



CELL 'B'


COVER THICKNESS



: SCALE: 1 inch = 1O feet
^-

•
'
*
'
.'
f
/
I
I
X i
2.40 1H90
I
I
'I
&0 2.|1O
1
1
1
2X65 2*05
1
1'

1
2X00 2410
| •
I
|
1

2.20 2.35\
\
\
\
\
\
\






IN FEET




128
                             PLATE   B-5

-------
 a


 •a
    I
 t) —
 Q U
""^^BBB-^ —
V
\
N
N
S
\
\
\2.25 2.08 2.42 2.06
^0 1.08 0*83 "vbO
I .
I
2^67 1.8,3 2j25 2jOO
0*92 1.08 O.83 l3>8

1
I
V2 'SI7 ^° 2x7
IjOO 1.17 1.25 • 0.92
1
, .(.,
1
2.142 2.17 2.00 2.17
it X X X
0.'83 1.00 1.00 1.00
i
1 •
1 •
1
1
2V|7 2.08 2.17 2.00
1.133 1.17 1.O8 1.17
1
1
1
I
|
2^58 V9_2 1^83 2£)8
Xl.OO 1.25 1.00 0.83
/
/
/
CELL SC'
COVER THICKNESS
LEGEND
2.25 Thickness of Soil Cover
X
1.00 Thickness of Sand Cover
SCALE : 1 inch : 1O feet
^^
7
. «
*
'
.
.
2.17 2.08/
"o^as 0^2
I
I
1
2^08 2J.17
0.92 Q|67
1
1
1
2.33 2^25
0K92 1.|33
1
1
1
2.25 2.i33
X 4
1.08 1.|00
1
1
1
2.17 2j08
X *
1.17 1.IO8
I '
I

i '
102 2JOO
0.92 Q92S
\
\
\

IN FEET





5
   z
z

o
    v_

   'o
                                                                                          PL Alt'  U-6

-------
    ID


    t>
     l>
    JE
    U
    C4
     o —
    O U
       C\J
       o
    2
    o
II 1(6-71)
^^8^
\
\
X
X
N*-42
V|00
1
1
'i67
0/83
1
|
-1.52
0|92
1
1
1
2|33
i.'oo
I
1
1
1

1.IOO
1
1
1
1.'67
J.

/1.O8

.
'
/
s
/



1.92
1.00

1I?2
1.08


1.67
a92



1.67
X,
1.0O




2.00
X
0.83



1.92


1.OO







COVER
LEGEND
2.42
X
1.OO

Thickness

Thickness


2.00
0.92

2^5
0.92


V5 .
1.O8



1x75 -
1.17




1.67
X
1.17



1.50


O.83






CELL


1.83
1.08

'x17
1.00


.£2
1.00



2-17
X
1.00




2.00
X
0.92



1.67


1.O8






'D1
THICKNESS IN

of Soil Cover

of Pea Gravel
SCALE: 1 inch = 1O



Cover
feet


2.17
0.92

2X°°
1.17


1.92
X.
1.25



1.67
X
Q92




1.75
X
1.25



1.58


O.92







FEET






.
\&T/
1.|00
1
1
1

1.|08
1
1
1
ijpe
1.|08
1
1
1
1.|08
1
I
1
1
1^50
1.IO8
I
1
1
2.'l7
- •*
1.OCN
V,
X
\
\
\
X







                                                             130
PLATf-I   B-7

-------
                                                                                                                       , f.V
   00


   •o
    tl
   JC
    v
    tl
   JC
   O .
      O
    O —
    o u
    X  i.
   CO O.
I H8-7II
«»-»
\
\
\
\
\
X
\
\
2^7 2*00 "vVs "2*00

2*33 2*50 1*92 2*50


i * v * y
1.i83 1.83 2.67 267
\
1
1
2.108 21fo • 2*50 2^5O
1
1
1
1
* X X X'
2.|75 2.50 1.75 2.33
I
I
1
1
•if VI W
/1.83 2J7 2.67 1.67
-
.
. •
/ s
s
,

CELL 'E'
COVER THICKNESS IN
SCALE : 1 inch r 10 feet
••••

>
.
.'
.
>
S
/
I
I
1
2*Ss 1.|75
1
1
I
1
&2 1-|67
1
1
1
2^0 2^)0
1
1
2^33 2.|17
|
I
I
I
.., vi_. „ 	 J.
1.67 2.25\
\
\
N
\
\
\
N

FEET

                                                             131
                                                                                               PLATE   8-B

-------
          APPENDIX C






CLAY BARRIER CONSTRUCT ION DATA

-------
TABLE A




















SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DATE
OF
TEST
1971
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/16
8/16
8/17
8/17
8/17
8/18
8/18
8/18
8/18
APPROX.
DEPTH
OF
FILL
(foot)
4.5
3.5
2.0
6.0
7.0
7.5
8.5
9.0
10.0
10.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.5
17.5
18.5
19.5
LOCATION
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
APPROX.
ELEVA-
TION
( (feat) )
190.5
189.5
187.0
192.0
193.0
193.5
194.0
194.0
195.0
195.0
194.0
195.0
196.0
197.0
198.0
199.0
200.00
201.5
202.5
203.5
204.5
FIELD
DRY
DENSITY
(pcfl)
118.7
114.0
113.2
113.7
111.5
114.2
117.2
117.7
122.2
119.5
120.0
118.0
119.7
117.0
119.2
117.2
121.2
118.0
113.7
116.2
122.5
WATER
CONTENT
(%>
16.4
15.8
17.4
15.1
16.4
15.5
15.6
16.4
15.3
15,5
15.0
15.6
15.7
15.4
15.7
16.4
15.4
16.2
17.4
19.3
15.9
MAXIMUM
LAB
DRY
DENSITY
IpcfP
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
115.0
116.0
116.0
RELA-
TIVE
COM-
PACTION
(*)
103
99
98
99
97
99
101
102
105
103
104
102
103
101
103
101
105
102
98
100
105
REMARKS

Re -worked 6
Accepted
I! 11
II II
M II
II II




Sand Cone
Density
Test Method









• NOTE: All field density determination by nuclear method except as noted.
PROJECT 102-1.3




















133
                                       PLATE  C-1

-------
    12Q
    100
                               10
    15            20
CONTENT  %
s
O
     R-
     MO.  102-1.3
                                                                    SAMPLE WO.
                                                                   SAMPLE  DEPTH
                                                                 From  Stockpile
                                                                SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
                                                                 Browng  Sandy
                                                                 CLAY
                                                                 SPECIFIC GRAVITY

                                                                    2.65 (est.)
                                                                 TEST DESIGNATION
                                                                  ASTM D698-70
                                                                           DRV
                                                                  DENSITY '( PC?)

                                                                     116.0
                                                                OPTIMUM MOISTURE
                                                                   CONTENT, %
                                                                      1U.5
                                                                   SAMPLE WO.
                                                                  SAMPLE DEPTH
                                                                SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
                                                                 SPECIFIC GRAVITY
                                                                 TEST  DESIGNATION
                                                                   MAKIMUM 9RY
                                                                  DENSITY  (pcf)
                                                                OPTIMUM MOISTURE
                                                                   CONTENT, %
                                       134
                                                                  PLATE  C-2

-------
          APPENDIX D
INSTRUMENTATION DETAIL DRAWINGS

-------


1
1
1*
c
3 .
C
C
1
5


ec
i
1
VJ


^
1
01
"
O
0
w
>

C
(J
S
c
Jj

t c
M






2
z
o

>
fV
•
1
CM
0
j

a
w
*

Tl 1(1-71)


Thermister Wiring 	 .
ft.1^% <*l MBkS^AV &K _P A • • — — —
NO. 3 Rubber stopper — ^^


3/4 • inch FVC Coupling — *•

| |
•thp-
^r~
M i
!!<

F • 'I
r^L'
1 H
" H
1 i





1/4 - inch Simplex Tubing 	 •4T**~--^frl i)













3/4 - inch FVC Schedule 40 —






1 /8 " Typ. f"
3/16" Typ. 	






3/4 -inch FVC End Cap-*-














C




I
--^A'
1



u_^
?
H
h
1
n
LL _____
»_ _ _




//^
.472

/
\,





— i




-






_-JJ
— ~.-S



•~5\
^\
n^
d




L__



2"

2"




1/2"















36 "-Stagger Slots at 2
inch Intervals around
Pipe Circumference

Notes:
1. If thermister is
placed inside probe,
epoxy thermister to
tube wall or stopper
2. Fabricate holes in
Rubber stopper for
Tubing and Wiring and
seal with Epoxy.









^ — ^^ RU^T>^"
GAS PROBE D-l
Full Scale /^/,



/• ^-j^UX

-------
   re

   c
   u
   O
   n
   o
c
3
O
O
   C
   o
   trt


    e
  _i
  £
       2 inch Pipe


       2 inch Coupling
                          SECTION A-A
  I
  u
    >
    *J

    C


    C
  N
  S
    C

    (/
    I
   cs
   a
Z
0

 » _
 • ft.
rd Pipe Cap— w-
Galvanized Iron
i Galvanized Iron
Coupling -*
\
>^\V



$







i y^



Variable
IA
3 \ /
b=>
     t-»"x20"x
1^

                           ELEVATION
          SETTLEMENT  PLATE   DETAIL
II 1(«->I)
                     Scale: 1 inch = 6 incb««
                                           -131-

-------
    ID
    n
    o
    c
    o
    o
    I

     C
  1

  1
  o
    c
    2
   i
  M
   ft
    I
    CM
    O
  O
Removable
PVC Cap
                      12
          " '•".: •
Concrete   V».»
Plug
          Impervious
2 inch  PVC
Schedule 40
        Slotted 2 inch
        PVC  Schedule 40
        (See  Detail)
        Concrete Sand
        Bond  PVC  Cap
/



/
                      6"
                               Stagger 1/16 inch
                               wide Stats
                               around Pipe
                               Circumference
                               36" Min.
                                              PU
                                                                  3"
                               Variable
                                       SLOTTING  DETAIL
                                       Scale:  1 inch s 2 inches
                               12"
           INSTALLATION  DETAIL
             Scale:  1 inch: 1 foot
              OBSERVATION   WELL   DETAIL
n ni-T
                                   138
                                                               PLATE 0- 3

-------
           Monitoring   Station
                                                   Alternate  Monitoring
                                                    Station   Location
c
i.
o
m
o
     §
     o
     IV
I
   i
     c
     o
     o
  N
   I
  «l
   sl
     I
     Cv4
     O
                                                       fl
                                                       II
                                                                ».
                                                              •   V"
                                                                  »»
                                    PVC  Elbow  and  Riser    I h*~~Pvc  RlSer
                                     with  Rubber  Stopper
         Coil
          and
                  10 feet of Tubing
                  Cap  Ends
                                  •Backfill with  Moist
                                 Compacted  Impervious
                                 Soil

                                Backfill with  Piezoseal
                                         2 inch  Boring
                         1/4  inch QQ Polyethylene Tubing
                                             Lysimeter
                                                              Variable
                                                                   4" Compacted
                                                                   Impervious Soil
                                                                   Variable
                                                                   6 " Concrete Sand
     e_
     "5"
Tl Hi-71)
        LYSIMETER  SAMPLING    SYSTEM
                       Scale:  1 inch s 1  foot
                                                                         J> -

-------
               1  inch PVC
H»mW
  V
           Impervious  Backfill
          1-inch PVC Scheduled
                 6-inch Boring
          1-1/2 -inch QD Porous
          Tube  and Reducer
          Coupling  (See Detail )
              Concrete  Sand
                                          Variable
1-71)
PIEZOMETER   INSTALLATION   DETAIL
	Scale :  1 inch = i foot	

                        140                         PLATE °"5

-------
  (0
  o
 i
 i
01
   \
 0 —
 o u
O
                      12'
                                n
                                II
                                      •*- 1 - inch PVC  Schedule  40
I-1/2-inch  *  1  inch PVC
 Reducer Coupling
                                            1-1/2-inch  PVC Schedule  60
                                             Sleeve
                                            1 - 1/2 - inch O.D. Norton
                                             porous Tube  P2120
                                           NO. 5  Rubber Stopper
             PIEZOMETER  TIP   DETAIL   -/V/-
                          Scale : 1 inch = 2 inches

-------
        APPENDIX E
REFUSE COMPOSJTSONAl  DATA

-------
RANDOM SAMPLE ASSIGNMENT
CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
21
55
92
160
168
180
189
224
238
255
359
457
480

CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
10
55
63
145
168
211
252
358
359
420
436
438
456
493
A
Sample
No.

A-21
A-55
A-92
A-160
A-168
A-180
A-189
A-224
A-238
A-255
A-359
A-457
A-480

D
Sample
No.

D-10
D-55
D-63
D-145
D-168
D-211
D-252
D-358
D-359
D-420
D-436
D-438
D-456
D-493
NOTE: Random sample


CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
11
14
78
125
178
186
187
255
265
336
365
370
439
495
CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
80
86
87
105
157
250
259
276
295
338
362
407
432
495
numbers (500
Handbook
B
Sample
No.

B-ll
B-14
B-78
B-125
B-178
B-186
B-187
B-255
B-265
B-336
B-365
B-370
B-439
B-495
E
Sample
No.

E-80
E-86
E-87
E-105
E-157
E-250
E-259
E-276
E-295
E-338
E-362
E-407
E-432
E-495
unit sample)
CELL NO. C
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
56
118
142
159
176
178
254
261
262
394
420
472
496
499


















obtained
Sample
No.

C-56
C-118
C-142
C-159
C-176
C-178
C-254
C-261
C-262
C-394
C-420
C-472
C-496
C-499


















from :
of Tables for Mathematics, 4th 1
     Chemical Rubber Co.
     18901 Cranwood Pkwy.,  Cleveland, Ohio 44128
                                    PLATE E-l
          143

-------
                                   REFUSE COMPOSITION
                                          CELL A
SAMPLE #
             food
             waste
      garden
             plastictcxtilc
             rubber,,
                                                           •V
 A21
                           70»3
                                          T7G~
                                                 xTTrnn057^
                                                  •~^... ^  =)!=>.  *—>-i
        ^*l
        T7B
                           22^2
                           79»7
              13»9
                                           8.2
                                         "29
 A92
       vrt<
-  §^
1677
      152.1
                      6.1
                     "22.3
                             Oo
      =_i°^-
      30c
       Jol
        7
                                                                               r
364<
 A160
              602
12.2
        26.9     3.0
                                                 373"
                                                         600
       Wtn
       13-JL
      191 o*4
      JL8o_6  1 _2_0
      10607~Tl6
                                          0,8
                             _0ol_

                             Oo5
8o2
 5.1
19°©
                           573d
 ;i8o
       32.6
                           9.5
                                   _
                                    1.5"
                                   11.5n 2002    1.0
                                                              [
 A189
                                          1.8
             50»1
        0ol
                                   33oO
                                                         Q06
 A224
       Wtc
2100
                      loi
                     SCJU -^T-L
                      3oO
                                                      "SBoO"
 A238
             10o5
              32cO_
                .0
                    I
                   Tn
                                    605
                                   =26To'
                                                               ^n
                                                                SB "voE
 A255
 A359
                      JoO

                      9
                                                 "oTS*
                                                  Io5
                                                  'CF
             1201
       11

       37
                                                              33o6
             1775'
       210 3
       '67T5"1
                                                 lob
                                   •2TT2'
       lic6S135
                                                 Icl

                                                 1.8"

                                                           .5
                                        L_
                                                  % is

-------
  REFUSE COMPOSITION DATA
        CELL B
plastic t©xtil<  wood
   5.6  I 0.7     1.1
  17:0-7 an) nr 373

-------
                                        REFUSE COMPOSITION DAT*,
                                               CELL C
CD
                                      I iJ.
                                      Iri3o8
                           0.3 I  • ^2c7j|
                               I   ^90l_
                           0,1 Tl33.2
                           208   133.1
                     ^§    208    30.2
                               111.12..3
                                             1
                                         18.1J   9.5
                         	6 j_ 1  ^606
                          28»9 iSOlol
                   J-^.^JLia.6__
                   2g7ojf37o5
                                                                     9.311  Oo6

-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION D&TA
       CELL D

-------
                                            REFUSE COMPOSITION
                                                   GILL E
-5s.
00
                                                         1.9L28.5
                                    155.3 1
_5o_01  ^606
 21o9«203oO
                                                  Q02
                                                  i.oT
                               6.2JI  38
                              18.61 112
                              37ol  133.1

-------
                  REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT DATA - CELL A
sample
no.
21
55
92
160
163
180
224
238
255
359
457
480

total total
•ret wt.pry wt.
12.25
13.70
11.55
25.52
8,67
10.66
12.41






1 1
7.69
9.80
7.38
17.59
6.55
8.15
10.14







moist
59.3
'39-8
56.5
45.1
32.4
30.8
22.4









4»
n
QO
OE
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
/^moisture
food
waste



gai'dei
wast.*



p«tper



nK'Srici
nibber



textile



wood



metal



glass,
leranic



ash,
rock



fines



Coozposit of samples „
NOTE - Cooposit Drying Samples were not taken for Cell A

O«5
01
total wet
wgjghtr $
total dry
weight #
^noisture

















•












Conrposit of samples, . -


0}
o<»
m
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^moisture






























Ccrrposit of samples,
* $ are % of dry weight.

-------
                              •REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT DATA  -  CELL  B
en
O
sample
no.
11
14
78
125
178
186
187
255 -
265
f
336
365
370
439
495
total
*et wt.
13.45
7.61
7.41
4.94
6.59
5.93
6.27
6.60
5.39
4.1 81
5.90
7.00
5.64
10.88
total
dry wt.
9-89
6.14
5.19
4.04
5.11
3.94
3.88
4.29
4.19
2.93
4.87
3.98
5.03
7.96
%
noist
36.0
23-9
42.8
22.3
29.0
50.1
61.6
53.9
28.6
64.2
21.2
75.9
12.1
36.7



*>
CO
CO
12
OS
0(3
i n
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^moisture
food
waste
10.02
4.0^
L48.0
gardei
waste
7.10
4.42
60.3
ipaper
7.34
5.82
26.1
rilfl«^t'.ir:
rubber
6.80
5.90
15.3
textile
6.60
4.98
32.5
wood
7.04
6.56
7.3
Coinposit of samples , B-ll, B-14,B-78, B-125
4»
•HCV
a
00
&
83

n
O3>
PH
ao,
oca
03

total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^aoisture
10.92
4.58
138.4
6.84
3.79
80.5
. •
9.98
8.00
24.8
8.53
7.22
18.1
9.48
6.49
46.1
7.67
6.40
19.8
9.86
9.28
6.3
11.73
11.62
1.0
5.03
4.38
14.8
10.87
7.14
52.2
  t
 en.
                                     CompOSit Of samples, B-336, B=365. B-370, B-439, B-495
            * % are % of dry weight.

-------
                REFUSE MOISTURE  CONTENT -  CELL C
I
!
j
n
_i
t-
W
vb
sample! total
iiC * p^rs u vrc *
56 ( 6.63
113
142
159
176
178
.
254
251
262
394
420
472
49 S
8.75
7.63
5.05
6.46
11.73
8.31
6.48
6.28
11.73
7.90
5.69
6.20
\ " ~ ~i
\ 499 " 4.98
! • !
total
Iry wt.
4.63
5.59
6.44
3.92
4.94
5.32
6.78
5.89
4.69
8.10
5.31
4.84
5.23
3.55
moist
43.2
56.5
18.5
23.8
30.8
120.5
22.6
10.0
33.9
44.8
48.3
17.6
18.6
40.3



p
3)
055
OS
o<3
to
total wet
weight #
total dry
v/eight #
^moisture
food
waste
13.82
6.01
130.0
gardei
waste
9.65
4.70
105.3
ipaper.
13i79
10.34
33.4
n1a03it Of saoples, C-254, C-261, C-262.
C-499.


•P
n
00
PH
EOL
OC3
0)

total wet
weieht #
total dry
weight #
^.moisture






•









6.35
5.72
11.0
metal
12.00
11.22
7.0
glass
13.73
13.65
0.6
ash,
rock
15.48
12.30
25.9
fine si
11.77
8.46
39.1
, C-176. C-178
16.34
15.38
6.2
16.80
16.65
0.9
15.48
12.30
25.9
16.54
10.65
53.3
C-394. C-420, C-472. C-496.















                       Composit of samples.
% £ire % of dry weight.

-------
                              REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT - CELL D
en
PC
Sejsple
no".
10
55
63
145
168
211
252
358
•
259
420
438
436
456
493
t.
total
vet wt.
6.93
4.06
5.42
5.76
7.28
8.3S
6.70
17.01
17.01
6.80
9.51
8.59
8.97
DAT
!
total
dry wt.
5.47
2.94
4.26
4.94
5.90
4.82
5.29
12.44
12.44
5.77
8.28
6.59
6.90
i LOST
i
%
coist
26.7
38.1
27.2
16.6
23.4
73.4
26.7
36.7
36.7
17.9
14.9
30.4
30.0



•P
n
OT
OH
EQ<
OH!
003
n\
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
/iaoisture
food
waste
11.12
4.79
L32.2
garden
waste
3.28
4.35
90.3
ipaper
9". 24
7.36
25.5
T^la^t-.ir-'
rubber
6.71
5.73
17.1
textile
10.45
8.22
27.1
wood
9.20
7.19
27.96
metal
12.42
11.76
5.6
glas^
:eraa.c
13.28
13.18
0.8
ash,
rock
7.36
6.37
15.5
fines
12.22
8.22,
48.7
Composit of samples , D-10, D-55, D-63, D-145, D-168, D-211



4»
•HN
n
oa>
IS
OB
«CJ
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
/^Eoisture
•
Conposit of
•P
w
o®
PH
BO.
ot3
n
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^aoisture
4.97
2.71
83.4
9.16
4.Q4
L26.7
11.73
9.41
24.6
5.58
4.97
12.3
6.73
5.64
19.3
6.99
5.85
19.5
•9.44
9.01
4.8
12.18
12.14
0.3
2.96
2.50
18.4
9.55
6.38
49.7
sanqples,D-252, D-358, D-359. D-420, D-438
8.31
3.49
138.1
2.61
1.39
87.8
5.21
3.18
53.8
4.48
3.87
15.8
4.59
3.34
37.4
4.86
4.13
17.7.
6.70
6.61
1.4
7.05
7.03
0.3
5.32
4.74
12.2
5.67
3.94
43.9
Composit of samples, D-^36, D-456, D-493
TJ

>

W


I
(-»
o
            * % are % of dry weight,

-------
                rtEFUSE MOI5TUHE CONTENT DATA  - CELL E
saaple
no.
80
a.f,
37
i 05
1 77
250
25:'
276
29?
338
362
407
432
495
total
•vet wt.
8.38
9.84
9.95
6.67
10.54
3.39
7.00
f .53
2.52
4.52
5.15
4.48
6.41
?.5«
total
dry wt.
7.21
3.10
8.55
6.15
7.62
2.05
4.50
4.59
2.02
3'. 44
4.35
3.27
5.34
5.09
%
moist
16.2
21.5
16.4
8.5
38.3
65.4
55.6
42-3
24.R
31.4
18.4
37.0
20.0
68.2




43
ai
OOJ
OH
Ea
oe
onj
to
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^iaoisture
food'
waste
11 .52
4.83
138. 5
gardez
waste
10.30
5.78
78.2
ip^per
li.ll
7.94
39.9
rja«rtjff'
lubber
8,95
7.75
L5.5
textile
8.74
7.50
16.5
wood
4.87
4.36
11.7
Composit of samples , 5-80, E-86, E-87, E-105,
.p
•HCVJ
n
O03
§3
o§
ucg
n
total wet
weight fr
total dry
weight #
5&aoisture
Compos it Of

t>
n
00
OH
BO
OcO
n
total wet
weight JF
total dry
weight #
^moisture
15.09
7.50
101.2
14. '20
7.75
83.2
14.34
11.49
24.8
9.21
7,47
23.3
13.47
10.09
33.5
saaples, £-250, E-259, E-276,
7.54
3.32
127.1
4.69
2.21
112.2
4.37
3.28
33.2
4.28
3.50
22.3 '
w .
z
>
tr<
M

5.03
4.23
18.9
E-295.
2.60
2.13
22,1
aetal
10.37
10.16
2.1
glas$
keraofijc
13.28
13.21
0.5
ash,
rock
9.15
8.59
6.5
5-157
12.41
12.08
2.7
14.40
14.17
1.6
11.43
10.53
8.6
fines
13.03
9.82
32.7

8.34
5.61
48.7
E-338, E-362, E-407
3.86
3.63
6.3
4.52
4.49
0.7
5.71
4.60
24.1
4.18
2.42
72.7
                      Composit of samples, n-432, E-495
% are % of dry weight.
                                                                                                &..

-------
     APPENDIX F
MONITORiNG SCHEDULES

-------
            SUMMARY SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Initial  Frquency  of Analysis  for Various  Parameters
1
Parameter
K
Na
Ca
Mg
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cu
Cd
Cl
PCB
pH
Alkal inity
COD
BOD
IDS
TSS
Sett leable Sol ids
N i t rogen
Ammonia
Organ i c - N
Nitrate - N
Initial
Leachate
*
*
semi -month 1 y**
semi -month 1 y**
*
*
*
*
*
semi -month 1 y**
*
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y
semi -monthly
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y

semi -month 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
Frequency
Groundwater
*
*
mon th 1 y**
monthly**
*
*
*
*
*
semi -month 1 y**
*
semi -monthly
semi -month 1 y
monthly**
monthly**
semi -month ly
none
none

month 1 y**
none
month ly**
                       155
                                                PLATE  F-l

-------
Parameter                       Leachate              Groundwater
  *                                                   .

Total Phosphate                 semi-monthly          none

DO                              semi-monthly          none

Color                           semi-monthly          none

Volatile Acids                  monthly***            none

Fecal Coliform                  semi-monthly**        monthly**

Fecal Streptococci              semi-monthly**        none
*          Baseline data to be collected monthly at least for the first
           six months.  The frequency of analysis will then be reeval-
           uated on the basis of the available data.


**         Frequency of analysis may change as the data are reviewed.


***        Baseline date to be collected at least the first 4 months
           within subsequent analysis depending on development of pH,
           alkalinity and BOD data.
                                      156                 PLATE F-2

-------
                          SUMMARY  SAMPLING  SCHEDULE


                          Frequency  of  Gas  Analysts

                         Commencing  February  15,  1972
 Cel1  Location

 Cel1  A -  Bottom

      A -  Middle

      A -  Top
                              Sampling Frequency

                              Quarterly

                              Monthly

                              Quarterly
Cel1  B - Bottom

     B - Middle

     B - Top
                              Quarterly

                              Monthly

                              Quarte r1y
Cel 1 C - Bottom

     C - Middle

     C - Top
                              Quarterly

                              Monthly

                              Quartly
Cel1 D - Bottom

     D - Middle

     D - Top
                              *

                              *
                              Monthly
Cell E - Bottom

     E - Middle

     E - Top
                              Quarterly

                              Monthly

                              Qua rter1y
   No gas samples can be withdrawn from these probes due to fluid
   interference.  Attempts in January 1972 to remove fluids encount
   ered in these probes were unsuccessful.  Attempts will be made
   periodically to withdraw samples.
Project 102-1.3
                                157
                                                          PLATE F-3

-------
                             SUHHARY  SAMPLING SCHEDULE

                      Frequency of Analysls  for  Various  Parameters
Parameter

K
Na
Ca
Hg
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cu
Cl
PCB
pH
Alkalinity
COD
BOD
TDS
TSS
Settleable Sol ids
Ni trogen
Ammon i a
Organic N
Nitrate N
Sulphate
Tot. Phosphate
DO
Color
Volati 1e Acids
Feca 1 col I form
Elect. Conductivl
Fecal Streptococc
Commencing February 15, 1972
Leachate
Cel Is A, B & E
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals

6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
quarterly
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
quarterly
ty 6-week intervals
i semi -annua 1 1 y
Cells C & D
mon th 1 y
month ly
semi -monthly
semi -monthly
monthly
month ly
monthly
monthly
semi -mon th ly
quarterly
semi-monthly
semi -month ly
semi -monthly
semi-monthly
semi -month 1 y
semi -month 1 y
quarterly
semi -monthly
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y
quarterly
semi -month 1 y
semi -monthly
semi -monthly
mon th ly
quarter 1 y
sem 1 -month ly
semi -annual ly
Groundwater
Wells 1 thr
A & E Subdr
Water Suppl
Cel 1 C
quarterly .
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
semi -annual
monthly
quarterly
quarterly
semi -annua 1
quarterly
quarterly
semi -annua 1
	
semi -annua 1
quarterly
	
month ly
----
	 ..
semi -annual
month ly
semi -annual
•u k
aln
y







ly


ly


ly

ly





ly

ly
*lnitial test of Cell A leachate will include all parameters listed In
 December 1971 schedule in addition to those listed above.
                                                             PLATE
                                     158

-------
                            SAMPLING SCHEDULE
                  Frequency of Fluid Samplin
                            Revised May, 197
                                                Analysis
Parameter
                      Leachate
               CelIs A, B 6 E
                                 CelIs C
                                    Groundwater
                                    Wells 1  thru k*
                                    A S E Subdraln*
                                    Water Supply
                                      Cell C
ATkalInlty
B.O.D.
Cadm!urn
Calclurn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Copper
               o-week I ntervals3-weekintervals
               6-week Intervals  3-week Intervals
               6-week intervals  6-week Intervals
               6-week Intervals  3-week intervals
               6-week intervals  3-week intervals
               6-week intervals  3-week intervals
               6-week intervals  6-week intervals
Dissolved Oxygen 6-week  intervals 3-week Intervals
Electrical
Conductivity   6-week intervals  3-week intervals
Fecal Coliform semi-annua1ly     semi-annua11y
Fecal Streptococci semi-annually semi-annually
Iron           6-week intervals  6-week Intervals
Lead           6-week intervals  6-week intervals
Magnesium      6-week intervals  3-week intervals
Mercury        6-week intervals  6-week intervals
Nitrogen-Ammonia 6-week  intervals 3-week intervals
Nitrogen-Organic 6-week  intervals 3-week intervals
Nitrogen-Nitrate 6-week  intervals 3-week intervals
Phosphate-total,
          as P 6-week intervals
P.C.B.
Potass i urn
Sod i urn
Sol ids-Total
  Dl ssolved
               semi-annua11y
                  3-week intervals
                  semi-annually
6-week Intervals  6-week intervals
6-week intervals  6-week intervals
               6-week intervals  3-week intervals
                                 quarterly
                                 quarterly
                                 quarterly
SolIds-Settleable  	
Total Sulphide quarterly
Sulphate       quarterly
Volatile Acids 6-week intervals  6-week intervals
Zinc           6-week intervals  6-week intervals
pH             6-week Intervals  3-week intervals
                                    quarterly
                                    semi-annua11y
                                    quarterly
                                    quarterly
                                    quarterly
                                    quarterly
                                    quarterly
                                    6-week intervals

                                    6-week intervals
                                    semi-annual 1y
                                    semi-annually
                                    quarterly
                                    quarterly
                                    quarterly
                                    quarterly
                                    semi-annually

                                    semi-annuaI Iy
  nlv If detected
  n cells;
quarterly
quarterly

quarterly
                                    quarterly

                                    quarterly
                                    6-week intervals
*D.O., E.C.  & pH to be run quarterly on Well k and A & E Subdratn.
                             159
                                                         PLATE F-5

-------
                       SAMPLING SCHEDULE


            Frequency of Gas Sampling & Analysis

                       Revised Hay, 1973
Gas Probe Location                          Samp I ing Frequency
Cell A - Middle                             6-week intervals
Cell B - Middle                             6-week intervals
Cell C - Bottom                             6-week intervals
Cell D - Top                                6-week Intervals
Cell E - Middle                             6-week Intervals
                             160
                                                    PLATE F-6

-------
         APPENDIX G
ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES


FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF LEACHATE,


GROUNDWATER AND GAS SAMPLES FROM


SONOMA COUNTY CENTRAL DISPOSAL SITE


   SANITARY LANDFILL TEST CELLS
        EMCON ASSOCIATES
         December 1971

     Revised February 1972

       Revised June 1972

       Revised June 1973

       Revised June 197^
                    Preceding page blank
           162

-------
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL

SAMPLING PROCEDURES AMD PREAKALVTICAL PREPARATION                        164

     Sampling Procedures                                                 164
     Sample Procurement                                                  169
     Sample Preservation                                                 165

ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES                                        167

     Detection Limits                                                    167
     Alkalinity                                                          167
     Biochemical Oxygen Demand                                           167
     Calcium and Magnesium                                               168
     Chemical Oxygen Demand                                              168
     Chloride                                                            169
     Color                                                               169
     Dissolved Oxygen                                                    169
     Electro-Conductivity                                                171
     Fecal Colt form                                                      172
     Fecal Streptococci                                                  172
     Gas Analysis                                                        172
     Heavy Metals                                                        174
     Nitrogen                                                            177
         Ammon la                    ...  . .   ,                              1 77
         Organic Nitrogen                "                                177
         Nitrate Nitrogen                                                178
     pH Measurement                                                      182
     Phosphate (total)                                                   182
     Polychlorlrtated Blphenyls                                           184
     Sodium and Potassium                                                187
     Sulphate                                       '187
     Settleable Solids                                                   187
     Total Dissolved Solids                                              187
     Total Suspended Solids                  ••   ..,,                       187
     Volatile Acids                                                      18£

BIBLIOGRAPHY                                                             189
                                             163

-------
                                    GENERAL
     Unless specifically noted, each analytical method Is used to determine

the specific constituent In all aqueous samples Involved In this Investigation.

The talcing, handling, and preservation of samples prior £o analysis will vary

according to the 'nature of the sample and constituent to be measured.  Pre-

analytlcal preparations may require acidification, dilution, addition of a

preservative, or filtration, to name some possibilities.                      ;

     The samples handled In this research project Include a broad range
                 i   i
of concentrations and sample conditions. 'The analytical  problems encountered
Include predicting the proper dilution ratio when samples are too concentrated,
estimating sample volumes when low concentration of a given constituent Is
expected, and changing analytical  procedures or methods when Interferences
occur.  It may sometimes be necessary to use several  methods for the same
species, shifting the method to suit the special sample conditions.
            SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND PREANALYTICAL PREPARATION
                                                              i  .
                   i
                  !
S amp 11 no P rocedures

     In all cases and at air times taking and handling samples should be

done In a manner which reduces to a minimum the possibilities for contamination

and at the same time reduces to a minimum the time between sampIIno and analysis.

The Importance of conducting analysis as scon after sampling has been completed

cannot be overemphasized.

     Since there will be a significant time Interval, (several hours)

between sampling and analysts, the samples for certain time dependent tests

must be preserved In some manner to assure that the error due to chemical and


                                     164

-------
biological change is held to a minimum.  The methods used in this
investigation are generally accepted and widely used (1, 2).

Sample Procurement
     Samples, with the exception of those obtained for bacteriological
tests, are collected in all-glass bottles with caps having
polyseal  liners.  The glass sample bottles are prepared for use
by cleansing with chromic acid followed by 1:1 nitric acid and
several rinses of distilled water.  When sufficient sample volume
is available, the bottle is rinsed at least once with the sample
fluid before filling the bottle to overflow capacity.  The samples
are then  prepared according to specific preanaly t i cal procedures
described beliow.
     Samples taken for bacteriological tests are collected in
125 f>1 plastic bottles with plastic caps.  The bottles are pre-
pared in  the laboratory beforehand by washing and sterilization
as described in Standard Methods* (page
Sample Preservation
     Depending upon the test series to be run, from one to four
samples are taken from each source for chemical analysis.   All
samples are stored on ice or under refrigeration at or below
1»°C until tested.  A preservative, HgCl2» in a concentration
of J*0 mg/1 of sample is added to samples to be tested for the
following components:
Alkalinity                 Ammonia-N              Sulfate
Chemical Oxygen Demand     Organic-N              Total Dissolved Solids
Calcium                    Nitrate-N              Total Suspended Solids
                           Phosphate              Settleable Solids
*Herinafter reference to Standard Methods indicates Reference 1
                                   165

-------
                            DETECTION LIMITS

     The detection limits listed below are the minimum detection limits
valid for normal operating procedures In the laboratory.  This list Is
provided as a guide for the evaluation of the analytical procedures.
Component
Cd
Cu
Fe
Hg
K
Mg
Mn
Na
Pb
Zn
alkalinity
BOD
Ca
COD
Color
Cl
Dissolved Q£
Nitrogen - NH3
Nitrogen - Organic
Phosphorus (as P0i»)
Solids - TS
Solids - TDS
Solids - TSS
Solids - Settleable
SO/,
Volatile acids
Detection
Limit
0.05
0.02
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.01
1
5
1
1
1*
1
0,1
0.5
0.5
0.5
5
5
5
0,2
5
50
Unit
mg/1
mg/l
mg/1
ug/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 as CaCO^
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
color units
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 as N
mg/1 as N
mg/1 as P
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
ml/1
mg/1
mg/1
                                     166

-------
                   ANALYTICAL METHOnS AND PROCEDURES
Alkalinity
     Alkalinity Is determined by tltratlon to a mathy1 orange end
point.  The sample Is diluted to 50r ml with delonI zed water to give a
reasonable tltratlon volume and sharp end point.  When severe color Inter-
ferences are present, the sample Is titrated to a pH k.2 end point using
a pH meter.

Blochemlcal Oxygen Demand (BOD)
     The biochemical  oxygen demand (BOD) determination is conducted
according to the procedure given In Standards Methods (page 48$).  The
direct plpetlng or dilution method Is selected for preparing BOD samples based
upon the estimated ultimate 5~day BOD.
     For samples containing unknown BOD strengths It Is necessary to
prepare a range of dilutions so that the actual value will be bracketed.
Generally three dilutions are required to assure adequate coverage of
range.  If the BOD can be reasonably estimated, the range of dilutions can
be narrowed somewhat, but I t Is usually best to take a conservative approach.
The following table will aid In preparing dilutions:

                                  ESTIMATED BOD DILUTIONS*
                   .Sample Volume..* ml        Range of BOD Expected
                (added to 30Q ml bottle)             mg/1
                           0.05                  12,000 - 42,000
                           0.10                   6,000 - 20,000
                           0020                   3,000 - 10,000
                           0.50                   1,200 - 4,200
                           1.0                      600 - 2,000
                           2.0                      300 - 1,000
                           5.0                      100 -   400
                          10,0                       60 -   200
                          20.0                       30 -   100
                          50.0                       10 -    40
                         ion.n                        5 -    20
                         300.0                        0 -     7
*  Modified and shortened from Sawyer & McCarty, Chemistry for Sanitary
   Engineers. Mefiraw-HII1. 2nd ed., 1967.  p 403.~~~~~
                                     167

-------
 Calcl urn, and  Maoneslurn
      The concentration of  calcium  Is  determined by eomplexometrlc
 tFtratlon with EDTA with hydroxy napthol blue  Indicator.  There  Is a
 strong  possibility of Interference  from dissolved heavy metals (e.g., CU,
 Zn, Nl,  Fe,  Pb).  This Interference (s overcome by complexlng the metals
 with  cyanide*.  Routine addition of sodium cyanide solution Is utilized
 to prevent potential  metallic  Interference.  The procedure Is described In
 Standard Methods  (page 181).  When sample volumes do not permit  tltratlon
 techniques,  Atomic Absorption Speetrophbtometry (AAS)'should be  used to
 conserve the sample volume for measurement of other parameters.  The methods
 described In Standard Methods (page 211}  and elsewhere10 can be  used.  Where
 highly colored leaehate samples are obtained It may be necessary to
 analyze Ca and Mg by AAS to avoid color Interferences with the EDTA method.
 Mg Is routinely determined by AAS but In certain favorable eases may be
 done by EDTA tltratlon.
C he m Ica 1 0 xygen Deman d (COD)
     The dtchromate reflux method, Standard Methods (page 495), has been
selected for the chemical oxygen demand (GOD) determination because It has
advantages over other oxtdants In oxldlzablllty, applicability to a wide
variety of samples, and ease of manipulation.  The sample and reagent
volumes used are 20 ml aliquot of sample, 10 ml of .25N K? Cr£ Oy and 30 ml
of H£ SOlj containing Ae^SO^.  The maximum COD concentration which can be
determined using the 20 ml aliquot sample is 2000 mg/1\ for COD concentrations
greater than 2000 mg/1, smaller volumes of sample diluted up to 20 ml with
distilled water should be used.  The sample is diluted to give reasonable
tftrattbn volumes and to assure complete sample oxidation.
     The standard ferrous ammonium sulfate tttrant Is approximately
0.10N, and Is standardized with each run.   When data indicate a COD
consistently below 500 mg/1, the normal procedure described In Standard
Methods (page 495) Is to be employed.
*CAUTION»  Cyanide Is a strong poison and great care should be exercised
           when handling.
                                168

-------
Chiori de
     Because of the interferences expected in leachate samples,
the method used for chloride analysis is the Mercuric Nitrate
procedure.  It is expected that orthophosphate,  sulfide,  and
sulfite ions will be in sufficient concentrations so as to inter-
fere with the Argentoroetric titration technique.   The procedure
as outlined in Standard Methods (page 97)  is used.   The presence of
sulfites  interferes.  If the presence is suspected, oxidize by
treating 50 ml sample with 0.5 to 1.0 ml of 30 percent H202-  This
method is used for both leachate and groundwater  samples.

Color
     Color is measured according to the Platinum-Cobalt method
described in Standard Methods (page 160).   Because of the  highly
colored, complex character of leachate, this test is no longer
pe rformed.

Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
     Most leachate samples are highly colored and it is therefore
not possible to use the Winkler Method of  analysis.  A field oxygen
probe is used for in-situ measurement of oxygen  in both leachate
and groundwater samples.
     Dissolved oxygen is measured in the field using a battery
operated Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Model 51A Dissolved
Oxygen Meter.  The  instrument is equipped  with a  combination
temperature, oxygen probe.  Temperature can be read to 0.3° C
and dissolved oxygen can be read to 0.1 ppm.
     Below is a detailed description for use by  field personnel  who
will be making the  in-situ DO measurements:
     1.  Calibration of DO meter.
         a.  Check the probe to assure the membrane is not damaged.
             Should the membrane be damaged, it  can be replaced
             following the procedures outlined under "Preparation
             for Operation" in the instruction manual.
                                    169

-------
b.  Connect the probe cables to the instrument.   The
    oxygen-temperature probes have two connectors of
    different sizes so they cannot be incorrectly attached
    to the instrument.
c.  With the instrument OFF check mechanical  zero of meter
    and adjust if necessary with the screwdriver adjust-
    ment in the lower center of the meter bezel.  Perform
    the adjustment with the instrument in the position
    it will be used.
d.  Turn the selector switch to ZERO and adjust  the meter
    to zero with ZERO adjustment knob.
e.  Turn the selector switch to FULL SCALE and adjust the
    meter to the full scale position (15 ppm  on  the
    meter).  If the meter cannot be adjusted  to  full
    scale, replace the batteries.
f.  Set the selector switch to CALIB Q£ with  theprobe in
    an environment of 100 percent relative humidity.
    This can be accomplished by placing the probe in the
    storage container partially filled with water, taking
    care that the membrane is not immersed.  Leave the
    probe in this position for a period of 5  minutes
    to polarize it before making further calibrations
    or measurements.
g.  With the CALIB knob,  set the meter pointer to the
    mark for the local altitude.
Measurement of Sample DO  Content.
a.  Calibrate DO meter as outlined in calibration proce-
    dures.
b.  Place the probe in the water sample at the measure-
    ment site.  To induce a flow of water across the
    membrane, raise and lower the probe.
c.  Turn the selector switch to TEMP and read the tempera-
    ture from the lower meter scale.   Record  temperature.
                       170

-------
         d.  Set the 02 SOLUBILITY FACTOR dial  to the observed
             temperature, taking care to use the appropriate
             salinity index (each section of the bar on the 02
             SOLUBILITY FACTOR dial  represents  5,000 ppm chloride
             concentration.).  Previous analytical data on chloride
             concentration should be used to estimate appropriate
             salinity index setting.
         e.  Turn the switch to 02 and read the dissolved oxygen
             value in ppm directly from the raeter dial.  Record
             dissolved oxygen value.
         f.  To perform a series of measurements in a short time
             at about the same temperature (within 5° C of calibra-
             tion temperature), reca1ibrat ion is not required and
             performance will not be degraded.   To take readings,
             simply repeat steps b,  c, d, and e,

Electro-Conductivity (EC)
     E1ectro-conductivity is measured in the field using a battery
operated Beckman, Type RB3, Solu Bridge.  The instrument is
equipped with three conductivity probe cells which provide a
measurement range of from 50 to 200,000 micro-mhos/cm.
     Below is a detailed description for use by field personnel who
perform the in-situ E.  C. measurements:
     1.   Check the battery by depressing the battery check switch
         and the ON-OFF button simultaneously.   The needle of the
         battery check meter should deflect to  the right (positive)
         and come to rest in the green zone.
     2.   Set the manual temperature compensator to the solution
        . temperature as measured by a thermometer or the reading
         from the D.  0. meter.  Record the temperature of the
         sample.
     3.   Immerse the conductivity probe cell in the solution to be
         tested to a point at least  one-half inch above the cell
         air vent.  Move the cell up and down in the solution once
         or twice to insure removal  of air bubbles from within the
         cell .
                                     171

-------
     i».  While depressing the ON-OFF button, rotate the main scale
         knob until the meter needle is opposite zero on the
         scale.  Release the button.
     5.  Read the scale value opposite the  index mark on the
         main scale knob.  Determine the electro-conductivity by
         applying the appropfiate conductivity probe cell factor to
         the scale value.  Record electro conductivity.
     6.  Instrument calibration is carried out in the laboratory
         utilizing solutions described in Standard Methods  (p.
         325).
     7.  Clean the probe by rinsing with tap water several times.
         Probes should be stored in distilled water when not in
         use.

Fecal Coli form
     The multiple tube dilution technique is used for the Fecal
Coliform Test.  Lactose broth is used for the presumptive test.
The confirmed test utilizes the boric acid  lactose broth.  Details
are given in Standard Methods (page 669).    Data are reported as
Most Probable Number (MPN)  per 100 ml with  a 35% confidence limit.

Fecal Streptococci
     The Multiple-Tube Technique is used for Fecal Streptococci ;
analysis.  The Membrane Filter Technique could be used equally
well.  The procedure used for the presumptive test, confirmed
test, and for computing and recording the MPN per 100 ml of the
samples  is  given in Standard Methods (page  689).

Gas Ana 1 ys i.s
     Gas samples from the landfill cells are collected in the
field and are analyzed in the laboratory using gas-solid partition
chromatography.  The system will separate and detect C02, H2,
N£, Q£ and CH/,.  The presence or absence of H2S is also checked.
     Sampling Procedure;   Gas samples are  collected in the field
in 250 ml glass gas sampling tubes.  The principle is to draw
the gas sample into and through the sample  tube under a vacuum
                             172

-------
and to seal  the container when a representative sample has been
collected.   Procedure for collection of gas samples is as follows:
     1.   Connect tubing from gas probe to gas sample tube inlet.
     2.   Connect the suction end of the field gas analyzer to gas
         sample t ube out let.
     3.   Open stopcocks on both ends of gas sampling tube.
     k.   Switch on  field gas analyzer and draw sample through
         gas sample tube into gas analyzer until  parts per million
         reading remains fairly constant, but for not less than
         one minute.  (Pumping rate is approximately 1^00 ml/min.)
     5.  .Close  sample tube outlet stopcock.
     6.   Close  sample tube inlet stopcock.
     7.   Disconnect the gas sample tube outlet from the field gas
         analyzer.
     8.   Connect the hand vacuum pump to the gas  sample tube outlet
     9.   Open the stopcock at the outlet of the gas sample tube.
    10.   Pump with  the hand vacuum pump for 20 repetitions (equal
         to  approximately 26" of Mercury pressure)  to evacuate
         the sample tube.
    11.   Close  the  stopcock at the outlet of the  gas sample tube.
    12.   Reconnect  and switch on the field gas analyzer.
    13.   Open the inlet stopcock, then the outlet stopcock of the
         gas s amp 1e t ube.
    \k.   Continue pumping for 30 seconds.
    15.   Close  sample tube outlet stopcock.
    16.   Close  sample tube inlet stopcock.
    17.   Disconnect gas sample tube from gas probe  and field gas
         analyzer.   Care should be taken not to disturb either
         stopcock while transporting and handling the gas sample
         tube.   Record on the gas sample tube the container number,
         sampling location, and date.
                                      173

-------
 CONNECT TO           GAS SAMPLE
  GAS
'ROBE— 7- TUBE—r
*^ 	 r-B-' * '
^-INLET
STOPCOCK
- T
-^OUTLET
STOPCOCK
GAS
ANALYZER

Heavy Metals
     Analysis for five heavy metals (Hg, Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd) is done
by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry.   Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd are
run by the normal flame method as described in Standard Methods
(page 417).
     Mercury is analyzed for by the flameless atomic absorption
technique similar to that prescribed by EPA Methods* (page 121).
Additional information on this technique is available (6, 7).
Details of the analytical procedure are presented below:

                    Total Mercury Analysis
     The following method for the determination of Mercury in
solution employs a preanalytical  acid oxidation procedure followed
by a simple  reduction aeration procedure to produce and introduce
elemental mercury vapor into a flow-through system where absorption
at 253.7 nm  is measured in a quartz-windowed cell.  This method
applies to both groundwater and leachate samples, although the
sample volume may have to be increased for the groundwater samples.
     The range of the method may  be varied through instrument  and/
or recorder  expansion.  Using a 25 ml  sample, a detection limit
of 1.0 i|Hg/l  can be maintained.  Concentrations below this level
should be reported as  1.0.
1.   Acid Oxidation Procedure
    a)  Place a sample aliquot of 50 ml  into a 500 ml.  volumetric
        flask.   Add 10 ml concentrated,  redistilled HN03, co°l and
                                  174

-------
        then add 15 ml  of cone.  t^SO^.   Because of the potential
        for loss of Hg  by volatilization,  the sample must not
        be allowed to become hot.   Stopper the flasks and allow
        to stand for 2k hours.
    b)   Add 25 ml  of KMnOj| to each sample.  If the color persists
        for at least one hour the  oxidation can be considered
        complete.   I f the color dissipates in less than 30 minutes,
        add KMnOjf  in 5  ml aliquots until  the color persists.   It
        is important that aliquot  oxidation be carried to completion,
        as unoxidized surfactants  will  foam, resulting in a poor
        analysis.
    c)   Add 10 ml  of 5% persulfate solution to each aliquot and
        allow to stand  at least  several  hours to overnight.
        Before diluting to volume, discharge the color using
        hydroxy1 amine solution.   When sample is ready for analysis
        i t shouId  be c1ea r.
    d)   Make up to volume.
2.   Analytical Procedure
    a)   Transfer the sample to the gas  washing bottle.  The method
        calls for  the removal of 100 ml  aliquots of both standards
        and sample; however, larger or  smaller volumes may be
        utilized with suitab1e correction  factors applied.  Add
        teflon stirring bar and stir at  moderate speed.
    b)   Add 4 ml stannous chloride, wait  5-10 seconds for complete
        mixing and insert the aerator.   The recorder should register
        a peak reaching maximum height  in  approximately 1-3
        seconds.  When  the maximum peak height has been obtained,
        remove the aerator and insert in  another washing bottle
        containing 5 ml of 7 N HN03 in  100 ml distilled water.
        The recorder should return to zero as the eluted mercury
        is driven  from  the cell.
3.   Ca1i brat i on
    Standards, including a blank are treated in a similar manner
    as  the samples.  Standards commonly employed are 0.0, 0.05,
    0.1,  0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ^ig/100 ml.
                                   175

-------
k.   Calculat ion
    Percent absorption is read from the chart  and converted to
    absorbance.  Absorbance is plotted vs.  ug  Hg, which should
    give a linear curve.   Sample values are derived from the
    result i ng graph.
        mg Hg/1  * final  dilution  volume  x  ^g Hg in  aliquot
                     samplesTzealiquot size
        for a 50 ml  sample  diluted to 500 ml with 100 ml aliquot
        taken :
              mg Hg/1   = flg Hg in aliquot
                              10
        for 200  ml:
                      mg Hg/1  = jug Hg
                                 20
    Reagents
    a)   HNOj:  redistilled, cone., stored in pyrex
        HC1:   redistilled,  cone., stored in  pyrex
        H^SOij:  cone.,  stored in  pyres or high density polyethlene
    b)   Diluting water:  must be  known to be  Hg free;  if it  is not,
        appropriate  measures must be  taken to assure  adequate quality
        water.
    c)   Stannous chloride:  10$ w/v in 1:1 HC1.  Dissolve 50 g of
       .SnCl2 in 250 ml  of  cone.  HC1  then dilute to 500 ml.
        This  should  be purged with air for several hours before
        use to  remove  any residual mercury.
    d)   Sodium  chloride: 30% w/v  solution
    e)  Hydroxy1 amine hydrochloride: 25$ w/v  solution
    f)   Sodium  chloride  - hydroxly1 amine: dilute 60 ml  of 25$
        hydroxy1amine  HC1  and 50  ml of NaCl  to 500 ml.
    g)   Potassium permanganate:  5$ w/v (Saturated solution)
    h)   Potassium persulfate:  5$  w/v  saturated solution, store in
        cool, dark place.   Solution stable for limited  period of
        t i me.
                                176

-------
5.   Apparatus
    a.   Atomic Absorption Spectrophotoroeter.    Any atomic absorption
        unit which is capable of accommodating the cold vapor
        cell.  Instrument settings recommended by the manufacturer
        should be followed.
    b.   Hg Hollow Cathode Lamp.
    c.   Recorder.  Any multi-range variable speed strip chart
        recorder campatible  with the UV detection system in use.
    d.   Cold Vapor Absorption Ce11.   Suitable cells may be constructed
        from standard spectrophotometric 10 mm cells having
        quartz end window or may be  constructed from plexiglass
        tubing making sure to use quartz end windows that are
        perpendicular to the line of light.  See Reference 1,
        6 or 7 for exact details.
Mi t rogen
    Ammoni a.  The preliminary distillation method is used for
ammonia as described in Standard Methods (page 229).  The distilla-
tion method covers the determination of ammonia-nitrogen exclusive
of total Kjeldahl  nitrogen.   This method covers the range from
about 1.0 to 25 mg/1 when the titrometric end point is used.
Since most leachate samples  will contain NHj-N in the range 100-600
mg/1, it will be necessary to use small sample volumes (20-^00
ml) and dilute with ammonia-free distilled water up to 50 ml.
    0 rgan i c N i t rogen. Organic Kjeldahl nitrogen is defined as the
nitrogen converted to ammonia from nitrogen components of biological
origin  such as amino acids,  proteins and peptides, but may hot
include the nitrogenous compounds such as amines, nitro compounds,
hydrazones, oximes, semi-carbazones  and refractory tertiary amines.
Organic Kjeldahl  nitrogen is determined after distillation of
free ammonia from the sample.  The method used is described in the
EPA Methods  (page 1^9) and is similar except for minor details to
the procedure detailed in Standard Methods (page
                                  177

-------
     N i t rate N i t rogen.  The Bructne Method employed for the measure-
ment of nitrate nitrogen is described in EPA Methods (page 170).
This method is based upon the reaction of the nitrate ion with
brucine sulfate* in a 13N h^SO^ solution at a temperature of
100° c.   The color of the resulting complex is measured at AlO
nm.  Temperature control of the color reaction is extremely critica
Details  of the analytical procedure are presented below:
                           Brucine Method

     This method is applicable to the analysis in both groundwater
and leachate samples.  Modification can be made to remove or
correct  for turbidity,  color, salinity, or dissolved organic
compounds in samples.  The range of the method is 0.1 to 2
mg/1 N03-N.
     Samples may be preserved for several days by the addition of
40 mg/1  HgCl2 and storage at 4°C.  Analysis should not be delayed
more than a week.
     1.   Points  to Note.
         a.   Dissolved  organic matter will cause an off color in
             13NH2SOi| and must be compensated for by additions
             of  all reagents except the brucine-su1fani1 ic acid
             reagent.  This also applies to natural color present
             not due to dissolved organics.
         b.   The effect of salinity is eliminated by addition of
             sodium chloride to the blanks, standards, and samples.
         c.   Ferrous and ferric iron and quadrivalent manganese
             give slight positive interference.  In concentrations
             less  than  1 mg/1 these are negligible.
         d.   All  strong oxidizing or reducing agents interfere.
             The presence of oxidizing agents may be determined
             by  the addition of orthotolidine reagent.
* 6 rue i ne S ulfate is toxic;  reagent bottle should be marked with
  warning.
                               178

-------
 e.   Uneven heating of the samples and standards  during
     the reaction time will  result in erratic values.
     The necessity for absolute control  of temperature
     during the critical  color development period cannot
     be too strongly emphasized.

Ana 1ytica1  P rocedure
 a.   Adjust the pH of the samples to approximately pH  7
     with 1:3 acedir acid and, if necessary,  filter through
     a 0.^5 }A pore size filter.
 b.   Set up the required  number of matched tubes  in the
     rack to handle reagent  blank, standards  and  samples.
     It is  suggested that tubes be spaced evenly  throughout
     the rack to allow for even flow of bath  water between
     the tubes.  Even spacing of tubes should assist in
     achieving uniform heating of all tubes.
 c.   If it  is necessary to correct for color  or dissolved
     organic matter which will cause color on heating, a
     set of duplicate tubes  must be used to which all
     reagents except the  brucine-sulfani1ic acid  has been
     added.
 d.   Pipette 10.0 ml or an aliquot of the samples diluted
     to 10.0 ml into the  sample tubes.
 e.   If the samples have  high dissolved solids, add 2  ml
     of the 30 percent sodium chloride solution to the
     reagent blank, standards, and samples.  For  ground-
     water  samples, sodium chloride solution  may  be
     omitted.  Mix contents  of tubes by swirling  and place
     rack in cold water bath (0-10°C).
 f.   Pipette 10.0 ml of sulfuric acid solution into each
     tube and mix by swirling.  Allow tubes to come to
     thermal equilibrium  in  the cold bath.  Be sure that
     temperatures have equilibrated in all tubes  before
     con 11n ui ng.
                              179

-------
     g.   Add 0.5 ml  brucine-sulfani1ic acid reagent to each
         tube (except the  interference control  tubes)  and
         carefully mix by  swirling,  then place  the rack of
         tubes in the boiling water  bath for exactly 25
         minutes.
         CAUTI ON; Immersion  of the tube rack into the  bath
         should not  decrease the temperature of the bath more
         than 1° to  2° C.   Flow  of bath water between  the
         tubes should not  be restricted by crowding too many
         tubes into  the rack, in order to keep  this temperature
         decrease to an absolute minimum.  If color develop-
         ment in the standards reveals discrepancies in the
         procedure,  the operator should repeat  the procedure
         after reviewing the temperature control  steps.
     h.   Remove rack of tubes from the hot water  bath  and
         immerse in  the cold water bath and allow to reach
         thermal equilibrium (20-25°C.).
                       i
     i.   Dry tubes and read  absorbance against  the reagent
         b 1 ank at 410 nm.
3.   Ca1culat ion
     a.   Obtain a standard curve by  plotting the  absorbance
         of  standards run  by the above procedure  against mg
         N03~N.  (The color  reaction  does not always follow
         Bee r ' s 1 aw).
     b.   Subtract the absorbance of  the sample  without the
         brucine-sulfani1ic  reagent  from the absorbance of
         the sample  containing brucine-su1fani1ic acid and
         read the absorbance in  mg NO^-N.  Convert mg  per
         aliquot of  sample to mg per  1 iter.
k.   Reagents
     a.   Distilled water free of nitrite and nitrate is to be
         used in preparation of  all  reagents and  standards.
                         180

-------
     b.   Sodium chloride solution (300 g/1).   Dissolve 300
         g NcCl In distilled water and dilute to 1.0 1.
     c.   Sulfuric acid solution.   Carefully add 500 ml
         (sp.  gr. 1.8M  to 125 ml distilled water.   Cool  and
         keep  tightly stoppered to prevent absorption of
         atmospheric moisture.
     d.   Brucine-sulfan I 1ic acid  reagent.   Dissolve 1 g
         brucine sulfate ^23^^20^) 2 •  H2SOi4 •  7H20 and 0.1
         g sulfanilic acid (NH2C6H/jS03H. H20)  in 70  ml hot
         distilled water.   Add 3  ml  concentrated HC1, cool,
         mix and dilute  to 100 ml.  Store  In  a dark bottle at
         5°C.   This solution is stable for several  months;
         the pink color  that develops  does not effept Its
         usefulness.  Hark bottle with warning:  CAUTI ON;
         Brucine Sulfate ts toxic; take care  to avoid ingest ion
     e.   Potassium nitrate stock  solution  (l  ml = 0.1 mg
         N03~N).  Dissolve 0.7218 g  anhydrous potassium
         nitrate (KNOj)  in distilled water and dilute to  1
         1Iter.
     f.   Potassium nitrate standard  solution  (1 ml  = 0.001
         mg N03-N).  Dilute 10.0  ml  of the stock solution to
         1 liter.  This  standard  solution  should be prepared
         fresh  week 1y.
     g.   Acetic acid (1+3).  Dilute  1  vol. glacial  acetic
         acid   (CH3COOH)  with 3 volumes of  distilled water.
5.   Apparatus
     a.   Spectrophotometer or filter photometer suitable  for
         measuring absorbance at  k 10 nm and capable of
         accommodating 25  mm diameter  cells.
     b.   Sufficient number of 25  mm  diameter  matched tubes
         for reagent blanks, standards, and samples.
     c.   Neoprene coated wire racks  to hold 25 mm drameter
         t ubes.
                                181

-------
         d.  Water bath suitable for use at 100°C.  This bath
             should contain a stirring rrechanism so that all tubes
             arei.at same temperature and should be of sufficient
             capacity to accept the required number of tubes
             without sIgnificant drop in temperature when the
             tubes are immersed.
         e.  Water bath suitable for use at 10-15°C.

Measurement of pH
     pH is measured in the  field using a battery operated Beckman
Electromate pH Meter.   The  instrument is equipped with s combination
electrode and normal operating procedures will  assure a precision
of +_ 0. 1  pH un i t.
     The  following is  a detailed description of test procedures
for use by field personnel  who will be making the in-situ pH
measurements.  It is important that explicit care be taken to
assure as great an accuracy and precision as can be maintained since
field measurements are unduly subject to possible error.
    1.  Calib ration of pH meter and electrode.
                           1                            •*••
        a.  Check the battery power supply to assure adequate power.
        b.  Check to make sure that the pH meter is in the proper
             operating mode.   Turn function switch to STANDBY,
            temperature compensation to the temperature of samples
            and buffers.
        c.  Be sure that the  samples and buffers are at the same
            tempera'ture before calibrating instrument.
        d.  Rinse off- electrode with distilled  water and dry gently
            with so ft  tissuepaper.
        e.  Place the combination electrode into the buffer
            solution pH 7.   Turn function switch to pH and after
            several minutes adjust the meter reading to the pH of
            the buffer solution by using the "standardize" dial.
        f.  Turn function switch to STANDBY.  Remove combination
            el ect-rodet f rom  buffer solution, rinse with distilled
            water, and dry.
                                182

-------
     g.  Repeat e. and f. for buffer of pH k.
2.  Measurement of Sample pH.
    a.   Use of the combination electrode allows measurement of pH in
        small beakers.  Use a clean 50 ml  or 100 ml beaker.  Insert
        the combination electrode in sample.  The electrode mus t not
        touch the sides or bottom of the beaker.  Turn function switch
        to pH.  Slowly rotate the beaker several times to insure
        good contact of sample and electrode.  When meter reading
        has been stabilized, record pH.
    b.   Turn function switch to STANDBY and remove electrode Rinse
        electrode with distilled water and dry carefully with soft
        t i ss ue.
    c.   Repeat procedure for each sample.
3.  Storage and care of combination electrode.
    a.   The salt solution in the reference part of the electrode
        should be topped off occasionally  to assure an adequate
        1 eve 1 is ma i n ta i ned.
    b.   The rubber sleeve should be kept over the fill hole
        except when equilibrating pressure or filling with salt
        s o r u t i o n .
    c.   The electrode should be stored in  a manner that keeps the
        electrode tip wet at all times.
Phosphate - Total
     Digestion of Raw Sample: The sulfuric acid - nitric acid digestion
method will be used to prepare samples for analysis of total
phosphate.   The method follows the description  in Standard Methods
(page 525).  Additional information on this digestion method can be
                o
found elsewhere.
     When necessary, the persulfate digestion method, Standard
Methods (page 526), will be used in lieu of the above.
     Analytical Method: The vandomolybdo-phosphoric acid
colorimetric method described In Standard  Methods (page 527) is
applicable to the measurement of total phosphate in the leachate
samples.  Arsenates interfere with the analysis above 0.05 mg/1 arsenic.
This method for total phosphate is adequate for the full range of
0.03 to 2.0 mg/1 as P.
     When necessary, the above specified analytical method will be
replaced by the ascorbic acid - molybdate  method, Standard
Methods (page 532).
                                     183

-------
Polychortnated Blphenyls (PCB)
     Since the chlorinated compounds are generally quite surface
active, most of the PCB  is expected to be on the suspended material.
The suspended matter, after separation on a glass fiber disc,  is
extracted by agitation in 1:1  acetone:acetonitrite.   Chlorinated
pesticides are partitioned into petroleum ether after the addition
of a weak salt solution.  The  extract is cleaned up on florisil
before gas-liquid chromatography detection of the chlorinated
materi als.
     This method is suitable for aqueous samples with or without
large amounts of suspended matter.   The detection limit is 10  nano-
grams per liter of sample.  Therefore tt is very important that
extraordinary cleanliness be maintained to avoid contamination.
                        Analytical  Method
     Samples containing  1 gm/1  or more suspended matter must be
filtered (Section 1) and the filtrate and suspended matter analyzed
separately as discussed  in Section  3 (water) and Section 2
(sediment).   Samples having less than 1 gm/1 suspended material
can be analyzed as a whole sample according to  Section 3.
     1.  Filtration of Heavi1y  Se%?men ted Samp 1es
         a.   Place a 7 cm. Whatman  GF/B filter  pad (or equivalent)
             in a porcelain Buchner funnel and  prewash with 50
      s       ml distilled petroleum ether.  Discard the washings.
         b.   Measure out 1 liter of homogeneous sample and filter
             us i ng s uct i on.
         c.   Transfer the filtrate  to a 2 liter separatory funnel
             and proceed according  to Section 3.
         d.   Transfer the filter pad to a 600 ml beaker with
             clean forceps and  proceed according to Section 2.
    2.  Extraction Procedure for Sediment Fraction
        a.  Add 100 ml of 1:1  acetonitri1e:acetone and 50 ml
            distilled water to  beaker containing the filter pads.
            Allow contact for  more  than 2 hours with occasional
            st i rring.
        b.  After 2 hours remove the sediment from the filter  pad
            by mascerating the  pad  with two clean glass stirring rods.
        c.  Allow the sediment  to settle and decant the clear
            supernatant  using  the stirring rods to hold back the glass
            filter fibers.  Decant  into 1000 ml of distilled water in
            a 2 liter separatory funnel.
                                  184

-------
     d.   Repeat the partittoning-with two addftional 50. ml
         portions of 1:1 acetonitri1e:acetone, each time allowing the
         sample   to soak  for more than one hour  with occasional
         swirling.   Decant the  clear  supernatant  into the
         separatory funnel.   This  should bring the total volume
         up to 200  ml  of extractant.
     e.   Add 30 gm  Na2SOi<  and extract two times with 150 ml
         petroleum  ether,  each  time washing the petroleum
         ether twice with  100 ml  distilled water  which is
         added to the rest of the  aqueous sample.   (This is
         done to wash acetonitrile and  acetone o.ut of the
         petroleum  ether so they  will not interfere with the
         floriisil cleanup.)   If heavy emulsion occurs at this
         point, as  it may  with  dirty  samples, include the
         emulsion with the aqueous phase each time and par-
         tition a third time with  150 ml petroleum ether.

     f.   Carry through with evaporation, florisil  cleanup
         and detection as  described   in  Section3 for aqueous
         sa.mpl es .

3. E x t r a c t i 6 n  P r o ce d u re f o r Aq u'e'o'u s  Fraction
     a.   Add 150 ml of redistilled }5%  diethyl ether in petro-
         leum ether to the sample.  Shake vigorously for 3
         minutes. Settle for at least 10 minutes.
     b.   Draw off and save the  aqueous  phase.
     c.   Swirl the  organic phase  to  dislodge water from the
         s i des of the funnel.
     d.   Draw the organic  phase into  a  clean 600  ml beaker.
     e.   Return the aqueous phase  to  the separatory funnel
         and repeat steps  a-d with another 150 ml  15$ ethyl
         ether in petroleum ether.
     f.   Repeat steps a-d  with  150 ml petroleum ether (no
         ethy1 ether).

                                185

-------
g.  Prepare a large funnel  with a small  cotton plug and
    2 teaspoons of Na2SOj,.   Wash this with 50 ml  petro-
    leum ether.
h.  Pour the sample through Na2SOit to dry it and catch
    the sample in a clean 600 ml beaker.
i.  Follow the sample with  another 25 ml  petroleum
    ether to wash the Na2S04 and catch this washing in
    the beaker containing the sample.
j.  Place the sample beaker in a k5°C water bath and
    evaporate to about 25 ml volume (about 2 hours).
    This evaporation can also be accomplished in a K-D
    evaporator.
k.  Prepare a 4-lnch florisil  column and  prewash with 50
    ml petroleum ether.   Discard the washing,
1.  Follow the prewash with the sample.   Add 150 ml of
    ]% (V/V) ethyl ether in petroleum ether and then 150
    ml of 201 (V/V) ethyl ether in petroleum ether.
m.  Add 100 micro!iters  of  distilled xylene to each
    elut rIated volume.
n.  Evaporate the collected volume to about 1 ml  volume
    in a K-D evaporator.
o.  Cool the evaporator  under a cold water stream and
    wash down the large  flask with the condensed solvent.
p.  Reduce the sample down  to an injectable quantity as
    rapidly as possible  in  a i»5°C water bath.  Thoroughly
    mix the contents before GLC detection.
q.  Initial detection is done by GLC using 3& OV-1 and
    the Nicher-63 electron  capture dector.  Confirmation
    of positive amounts  of  chlorinated hydrocarbons is
    first done on 3$ OV-17  using a Coulson electrolytic
  i  conductivity halide  specific detector and then on
    5% OV-17 plus 2% QF-1 using a Dohrmann micro-coulometr5c
    chloride specific detector.
                     186

-------
Sodium and Potassium
    The preferred method of analysis for sodium and potassium
utilizes the flame photometer technique.  Standard analytical
procedures are followed as described in Standard Methods (page
317 and 283) .
    Satisfactory results can also be achieved by Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotoraetry.

Sulfate
    Sulfate is determined by a gravimetric method utilizing preci-
  pitation;  with barium chloride, forming a barium sulfate solid.
The filtered precipitate is ignited at 800°C for 1 hour prior to
              ji       •
cooling and weighing.  This method is used for both leachate and
groundwater samples.  Care must be taken with leachate samples
to avoid error caused by precipitation of barium chloride during
the sulfate analysis.  The gravimetric method is described in
detail in Standard Methods (page 331).

Settleable Sol ids
    Settleable matter is determined according to the procedure
given in Standard Methods (page 539)  using the trahoff cone.

Total Dissolved Sol ids (TDS)
    Total dissolved solids is determined according to the proce-
dure described in Standard Methods (page 290).   There may be a
significant dissolved organic fractton.present  in the leachate
samples so that correspondence between specific conductance and
TDS may be different from that of the groundwater samples.

Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)
   The analytical procedure employed for determining suspended
solids was originally described by Wycoff (M.   Suspended solids
are determined by leachate filtration through a glass fiber filler
pad.  The initial weight of each pad is  determined before filtra-
tion.   Following filtration,  the pads are dried for one hour at

                                187

-------
103°C and then weighed.  The glass pads are weighed again after
being ignited for 10 mtnutes at 600°C ff the volatile fraction
is to be determined.  The method utilized is described in Standard
Methods (page 537)

Volati1e Aci ds
     Volatile acids (total organic acids)  is measured by the
column-partition chromatographic method as given in Standard
Methods (page 577).  Special precautfon should be exercised in
maintaining the normality of the standard  sodium hydroxide
titrant by excludfng C02 from the reagent  bottle.
                             188

-------
                          BIBLIOGRAPHY


 1.   APHA,  Standard Methods  for the 'Exart t nation of Water and Waste-
     water.  13th ecL ,  1971 .                          '

 2.   Environmental  Protection Agency,  Water Qua 1ity 0ffice ,
     Analytical  Quality Control Laboratory, Methods for Chemical
     Analysis  of Water and Wastes,  1971.

 3.   Steiner,  R, L. and A.  A. Fungaroli, "Analytical Procedures
     for Chemical  Pollutants:  Research Project on Pollution of
     Subsurface  Water  by Sanitary Landfill", Report SWUE-12,
     Drexel  University (no  date).

 1*.   Wychoff,  B. M. ,  "Rapid  Solids  Determination  Using Glass Fiber
     Filters",  Water  and Sewage Works , 111, 277,  1964.
                                                    ji
 5.   Mancy,  K.  H.  and  T.  Jaffe, "Analysis  of Dissolved Oxygen in
     Natural  and Wastewaters:,  USPHS Publication  999-WP-37,  1966.

 6.   Hatch,  W.  R.  and  W.  L.  Ott, "Determination of Sub-Microgram
     Quantities  of Mercury  by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry",
     Analytical  Chemistry.  *0,  2085, 1968.

 7.   Brandenberger, H. and  H. Bader, "The  Determination of Nano-
     gram Levels of Mercury   in  Solution by  a Flameless Atomic
     Absorption  Technique",  Atomic  Absorption News 1etter,6,  101,
     1967.

 8.   Menzel,  D.  W.  and N.  Corwin, "The Measurement of Total  Phos-
     phorus  in  Seawater Based on the Liberation of Organically
     Bound  Fractions  by Persulfate  Oxidation", Limnol. Oceanogr,
     10, 28,  1965.

 9.   Sawyer,  C.  N.  and P.  L. McCarty,  Chemistry for Sanitary Engineers,
     2nd ed. ,  McGraw-Hi11 ,  1967.

10.   Fishman,  M. J. and S.  C. Downs /Methods • • for - Anal ys i s  of
     Selected  Metals  in Water by AtomTc Absorption,USGS  Water
     Supply  Paper 15^0-C,  1966.

11.   Mancy,  K.  H.,  Instrumenta 1 Ana 1ysis for Water Pollution
     Control ,  Ann Arbor Science Publication, 1971.

12.   Skoog,  D.  A.  and  D.  M.  West, Fundamentals of  Analytical
     Chemi st ry,  2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart and  Windston, 1970.

13-   Lingane,  J. J.,  E 1 ect roan a 1 y t ? c'a'l Chemistry,2nd ed.,
     I n terscience ,  1 958".
                                    189

-------
  APPtND i X  H
MONITOREO

-------
                      TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE
      PLATE NO.,
Thermistor Readings
Gas Probe Readings
Laboratory Gas Analysis - Cell A & B
Laboratory Gas Analysis - Cell C & D
Laboratory Gas Analysis - Ceil E
Leachate Analysis - Cell A
Leachate Analysis - Cell B
Leachate Analysis - Cell C
Leachate Analysis - Cell D
Leachate Analysis - Cell E
Water Analysis - Water Added to
     CelIs B R C
Groundwater Analysis - Well  1
Groundwater Analysis - Well  2
Groundwater Analysis - Well  3
Groundwater Analysis - Well  k
Groundwater Analysis - Original
    Geotechnical Investigation
Cel1  A & E Subdrain
Observation Wells and Piezometers
Cumulative Leachate Production
Cumulative Leachate Production
Lysiraeter Samples - Field Analysts
Solution Analysis
Record of Rainfall, Evaporation and
            Runoff
Sett 1ement Data
Fluid  Routing - Cell C
Fluid  Routing - Cell D
H-1A, IB, 1C
      t
H-2A, 2B (Discontinued)
H-3A, 3B, 3C
H-4A, 1»B, AC
H-5A, 5B
H-6A, 6B, 6C, 6D
H-7A, 7B, 7C, 7D
H-8A -8L
H-9A.-9K
H-10A - 10E

H-l1A - 1 IE
H-12A - 12E
H-13A - 13E
H-H»A - UE
H-15A, 15B, 15C, 15D
H-16A

H-17A, 17B, 17C, 17D
H-18A
H-19A, 19B, 19C, 19D
H-20A (Discontinued)
H-21A
H-22A (See Table 1l)

H-23A- 23FF
H-2AA - 2kl
H-25A - 25K
H-26A - 26K
                              191

-------
                                        THERMISTER READINGS
DATE TIKE AIR
TEMP.
1971
11-8 PM 25. B
11-10 AM 24.5
PM 22.3
11-11 AM
11-12 AM
11-14 AM 9.1
PM ' -
11-15 AM 9.8
11-16 AM 13.2
PM 21. 4
11-17 AM 7.0
PM 20.3
11-18 AM 13.5
PM 20.1
11-19 AM 9.7
PM 17.5
11-22 AM 7.2
PM 17.5
11-23 AM 10.0
PM 12.0
11-24 AM 10.5
PM 10.0
11-29 AM
11-30 AM 6.1»
PM 21.0
12-1 AM 10.1
12-2 AM 7.5
PM 7.5
12-3 AM 6.7
12-6 AM 15.0
PM 18.1
12-7 AM 12.5
12-8 PM 15. i»
12-9 AM 12.1
12-10 AM 15.0
CELL A
Tempantur* °C
Bot. Mid. Top

17.1 -
26.6 19.1
26.8 26.6
27.8 27.5
29.6 27. S
25.1 29.5 18.5
24.8 29.2 19.1
2U.2 28. 4 27.6
22.4 28. 4 42.5
22.6 28.2 43.9
22.5 27.9 35.7
22.3 27.9 33."*
22.3 27.5 28.6
22.3 27.5 27.7
22.2 27.7 26.1
22.2 27.6 25.8
21.9 27.1 24.0
21.9 27.1 24.0
21.8 27.0 24.0
21.8 27.0 23.9
21.8 27.0 23.9
21.8 26.9 23.5
21.7 26.4 23.2
21.6 26.3 21.9
21.6 26.3 21.9
21.7 26.5 21.7
21.6 26.2 21.4
21.5 26.1 21.2
21.6 26.0 21.3
21.4 26.1 19.9
21.4 25.8 19.7
21.4 25.8 19.1
21.4 25.6 18.8
21.6 25.6 18.3
21.4 25.5 17.8
CELL B
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top













18.1
.
22.6 13.8
22.8 19.4
22.4 25.5
22.6 25.6
23.2 26.6
23.2 27.4
23.4 28.9
23.4 29.1
23.9 34.4
24.1 35.1
24.2 35.2
24.4 35.5
24.7 35.7 20.6
24.6 35.7 22.2
24.5 35.6 21.0
25.7 34.8 19.7
25.7 34.7 20.9
25.9 34.4 21.7
29.3 33.1 21.7
29.7 32.9 22.7
30.5 32.7 22.6
CELL C
Temperature C
Bot. Nld. Top




































CELL D
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top




































CELL E
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Toe










18.2
22.5
24.5
30.7
22.7
24.5
25.2
30.7 19.6
31.0 19.9
31.4 -
31.3 20.1
31.5 20.3
31.3 20.6
29.3 26.2
29.0 26.1
28.9 27.1
28.9 27.8
28.6 28.8
28.5 28.9
28.5 28.7
27.9 32.0
27.9 32.0
27.9 32.5
27.8 32.8
27.8 33.0
27.8 33.1
                                        TIIERMISTER READINGS
                                                                                         PLATE  H-1A
DATE TIME AIR
TEMP.
1971
12-13 AM 11.5
12- 14 AM 11.7
12-15 AM 11.3
12-16 PM 14. <<
12-17 PM 14.3
12-20 PM 9.9
12-21 AM 6.6
12-28 PM
12-29 PM1'
12-30 AM
1972
1-11 AM
1-18 PM
1-27 AM
2-15 AM - '
3-14 AM -
3-28 AM
4- 1 1 AM
4-25 AM
5-9 AM
5-23 AM
6-6 AM
6-20 AM
7-11 AM
7-25 AM
8-8 AM
8-23 AM .
9-7 AM
9-20 AM
10-11 AM |6.o
10-24 AM
11-8 AM' 21.0
ll-2t AM 13.0
CELL A
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top

21.3 24.9 16.6
24.3 25.6 22.6
21.7 25.1 16.1
21.6 25.0 15.7
.
21.4 24.5 14.6
-
21.3 21.3 13.9
21.2 23.7 13.7
-

20.7 22.5 12.8
20.5 22.0 II. 1
20. 6 21.7 13.8
19.7 20.6 17.4
19.0 19.5 15.4
18.6 18.5 15.4
18.4 18.3 16.1
18.2 18.1 16.9
18.2 18.1 16.2
18.1 18.2 20.0
18.1 18.5 21.5
18.1 18.5 23.4
18.2 19.1 24.6
18.5 '9. * 25.6
18.7 19.9 25.9
18.9 20.4 26.0
19.0 20.4 26.6
20.7 -
19.5 21.3, 24.9
The
19.5 20.6 16.7
19.4 20.4 14.3
CELL B
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top

30.4 32.1 21.4
31.8 39.9 25.6
30.2 31.9 21.3
30.1 31.9 21.3
29.8 31.6 21.2
28.9 30.9 20.9
-
26.9 29.2 20.0
26.7 28.8 19.8
-

27.2 27.1 18.6
24.2 25.3 17.3
24.0 24.1 17.2
22.7 22.2 15.9
20.7 20.2 16.9
20.2 19.7 17.5
19-8 19.8 17.5
19.6 19.2 17.6
19.3 '9.0 18.8
19.2 19.0 20.0
19.2 19.2 21.1
19.2 19.5 22.6
19.5 20.1 24.1
19.7 20.6 25.1
19.8 20.9 25.0
20.2 21.3 25.0
20.5 21.6 25.5
21.9 -
20.8 21.9 23.3
mister Connections
20.5 21.1 18.5
20.6 20.8 17.2
CELL C
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top

31.6 22.6 -
32.5 25.4 20.2
30.1 23.7 24.2
29.7 24.7 21.1
29.3 25.4 20.0
28.3 26.2 17.3
-
26.6 26.1 14.6
26.4 26.0 14.5
26.3 25.8 14.4

24.5 25.0 11.5
23.8 20.3 10.7
22.9 16.8 10.7
20.6 13.5 10.6
18.5 14.0 14.3
18.2 15.6 14.7
18.1 15.7 15.1
17.0 15.7 15.4
17.2 16.9 16.7
17-9 18.4 18.5
18.7 19.9 19.6
19.4 20.4 21.7
20.2 22.3 22.4
21.1 23.6 22.6
21.7 23-3 23.0
21.9 23.6 23.2
22.4 24.1 25.5
24.0
22.4 21.7 20.7
shorted-out by ra i
Shorted Out
21.2 - 17.0
CELL D
Temperature C
Bot. Hid. Top





11.3
16.1
17.7
19-5 21.2 23.2
19-5 22.1 24.3
19.5 22.5 22.4

19.9 16.4 15.2
15-9 15.1 13.7
15-7 14.0 14.5
12:4 11.5 10.8
17.0 13.9 14.3
16.5 15.9 16.0
17.0 16.3 17.6
16.6 16.6 17.0
17.4 18.1 19.)
18.8 20.0 21.8
20.9 21.8 24.7
22.9 23-5 27.6
25.0 26.5 28.0
26.9 27. J 29.2
27.5 27.6 30.3
24.9 26.6 29.3
26.8 27.6 27.9
28.1
26.9 26.0 23.6
iwater .
25.2 21.5 16.8
22.5 19.2 14.6
CELL E
Temperature C
Bot. Mid. Top

28.0 32.8 19.2
24.0 27.5 17.4
27.9 33.4 18.8
28.0 33.4 18.4

28.0 33.0 16.7
. - -
28.0 31.8 14.5
27.8 31.5 14.1


26.9 29-2 10.9
26.1 27.4 10.9
27.9 32.4 11.7
23.2 23.7 12.2
21.0 20.9 16.2
20.6 19.9 17.6
19.8 19-2 16.7
19.3 IB. 8 17.8
19.1 18.9 18.9
18.8 18.7 21.0
18.9 18.2 23.4
18.9 19-5 25.4
19-2 20.3 26.4
19.5 20.9 26.2
19.7 21.4 27.1
19.8 21.6 27.0
20.2 22.1 27.5
22.4 -
20.5 22.5 23.0

20.6 21.1 20.6
20.5 20.5 12.4
Project 102-1.3
                                            192
                                                                                          PLATE  H-IB

-------
                                  THERMISTOR READINGS
DATE TIME AIR
TEMP.
11-30 AM 6.0
12-19 AM l*.0
HO-73 AM 11.0
1-23-73 AM 5.0
2-6-73 AM 11.5
2-27-73 AM 13.0
3-13-73 AM 11.5
3-27-73 AM 15.5
4-10-73 AM 21.0
*-2*-73 AM 22.0
5-15-73 AM 22.0
6-5-73 AM 20.0
6-26-73 AM 27.0
7-17-73 AM 19.5
8-7-73 AM 16.8
8-29-73 AM
9-19-73 AM 21.5
10-9-73 AM 19.5
10-30-73 AM 32.0
11 -20-73 AM -
12-11-73 AM 20.0
l-*-7* AM 10.5
1-22-7* AM 16.5
2-13-71! AM 12.5
3-6-7* AM 15.0 5
3-28-7* AM 16.0
*-!7-7* AM 15.0
5-7-7* AM 27.0
5-28-7* AM 21.0
6-19-7* AM 18.0
CELL A
Temperature C
Bot. Mid. Top
19.2 20.0 13.1
18.9 19.1 7.8
18. 2 17.6 8.0
21.2 16.8 10.5
15.** 16. 
-------
                                           OAS PROBE READINGS
                                                              (I)
DATE TIME
1971
11-19 AM
11-22 AM
PH
11-73 AM
PM
11-31) AM
PM
11-29 AM
FM
11-30 AM
PM
12-1 AM
12-2 AM
P«
12-3 Aff
l?-6 AH
PH
12-7 AK
12-8 PH
12-9 AH
12-10 AH
12-13 PH
12-1U AM
12- IS AH
12-16 PM
12-17 tK
12-19 Pi:
12-20 FM '
•j
CELL A
Exjilosllfllty-t
Bot. Kid. Tc:-

0.80 0.67 O.MO
'': 1.00 O.t.O
1.00 * O.SG
0.98 1.00 0.50
* 1.00 8.50
1.00 * 0.50
ft * 0,58
* ft " 0.68
-
'V I'- 0.60
* ft 0.58
1.00 A 0.56
1.00 * 0.145
1.00 « 0.30
1.00 * 0.35
1.00 >1 O.MO
1.00 1.00 O.Me
1.00 1.00 0.38
0.80 0.60 O.U2
« 1.00- 0.12
ft ft • 0.1(8
ft ft Q.50
» * O.U6
.
-
-

CELL B
CxploslbiJ Jty-%
Pot. Kid. Top

&?3 0.18
0.i'2 O.UO
0.50 O.UO
0.5M O.MO
0.50 O.UO
O.U8 0.10
O.U6 O.MO
0.5U 0.56
O'v70 0.60
0.'70 0.60
0.66 0.92
0.50 1.00
0.60 o.ao 0.20
0.60 0.60 0.20
O.GO 0.60 0.20
0.58 0.58
* 0.80
0.6U 0.80
0.60 0.92
0.6U 0.92
ft *
ft A *
« A *
-
0.28 0.18
-

CELL C
ExFlosTbTTity-%
hot. Hid. Ton






















* * 0.2
* * 0.66
ft * o.7M
-
•'•• * 0 . 80

CELL D
Explosibllity-*
Bot. Kid. Top
























0. 18
_
0.22

CELL C
ExplosTETTity-t
Bot. Mid. Top

0.20
A
Si
_
k
ft
ft 0.60
ft 0.86
ft 0.88
t: 0.88
* 0.9?
ft 0.88
A 0.90
ft 0.90
ft 0.90
0.66
0.70 0.70
ft . O.OU
ft ft
« ft
ft ft
»'•• * 0.80
ft 4 *
ft A ft

-
~ _
-

  'D   Gases  collected in the gas probes were tested for  concentration in parts per million of
       combustible toxic vapors present.  Concentrations  exceeded  instrument readout limits of 1000
       parts  per million and are therefore not included in  this table.
   * - Indicates a reading exceeding the 0-1 ranee of the explosibility gauge.             PLATS  H-2A
                                              GAS PROBI HEADINGS
                                                                    (I)
DATE TltfE
I«72
'" • ' " vf —
1-2 PM
! - 1 1 AC.
;-i8 PM
i-J7 PH
2- ; •> M
J-2 AN
3-14 «N
.4-11 AH
i-:5 AM
5-S13) AM
5-23 AN
6-i
6-20
7-11 AM
7-25 AH
8-23 AM
9-1 *K
•-20 AM
!C-:4 AM
li-21 A.1
12-1J AM
1173 !.'
1-2J Vtfl
2-27 AM
3-27 AK
*-2ii AM
t-S AH'
n — cnrs 	
Exptcslblllty-*
Bot. Mid. Top
ft ft ft
3.5 3-6 0.9
3.0 3.2
A
1.0 2.6 0.2
l.
-------
                                       LABORATORY GAS  ANALYSIS
                                              CELLS A & B
PROBE
NO.
A-B



A-H



A-T



B-B



B-M



B-T



GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N 1 1 rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Ni t rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
NI trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
12-8-71




21.8
12.4
65.8
0








36.0
9.2
54.8
0




1-3-72
35.3
14.7
50.0
0
1.7. 
-------
                                      LABORATORY GAS  ANALYSIS
                                              CELLS A S B
PROBE
NO.
A-B



A-M



A-T



B-8



B-M



B-T



GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
12-11-73
5*. 5
0.3
45.0
0.2












64.9
0.4
26.7
8.0




1-22-74
40.5
0.2
59.1
0.2
















42.5
0.4
32.8
24.3
3-6-74
72.9
0.4
26.2
0.5
















63.5
0.2
18.5
17.8
4-17-74
75.6
0.5
23.4
0.5












67.3
0.2
14.4
18.1




5-28-74








44.3
0.8
54.8
0.2
63.8
0.3
21.8
14.1




38.3
0.8
58.4
2.5




















































































































































>.

* - First  letter Indicates cell; second  letter Indicates bottom, middle or top  probe.
PLATE  H-3C
                                            196

-------
                                           LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
                                                CELLS C * 0
PROBE
NO.
C-B



C-M



C-T



D-B



D-M



D-T



GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
DATE
1-11-72
54.7
8.6
36.7
0
71.8
4.7
23-5
0
57.5
6.1
3it.it
0
52.5
9.5
38.0
0




61. it
7.3
31.3
0
1-18-72




51.5
10.7
37.8
Tr
















1-27-72
59.0
8.3
32.7
Tr




59.0
8.6
32. 4
Tr








77-3
4.2
18.5
Tr
2-15-72
63.9
7.8
28.3
0
75.7
4.9
19. it
0
68.5
6.2
25.3
0








89.5
1.9
8.6
0
3-2-72
67.2
6.8
26.0
Tr




72.3
4.7
23.0
Tr








94.9
0.3
it. 8
0
3-H1-72




81.6
4.0
lit.li
Tr
















3-28-72




















97.7
0.1
2.2
0
4-25-72
96.6
0.5
2.6
0.3
















97.1
0.1
2.8
Tr
5-23-72
99.5
Tr
0.2
0.3




















-20-72
98.0
0.3
1.4
0.3
















98.3
Tr
1.7
Tr
7-25-72
98.4
Tr
0.2
1.4
















88.0
0.1
3.2
8.7
              - First letter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-4A
                                           LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
                                                CELLS C S D
•m-
PROBE
NO.
C-B



C-M



C-T


D-B



D-M



D-T



GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
8-23-72
95.4
Tr
0.3
4.3















58.4
Tr
1.2
40.4
9-11-72



















48.5
O.ll
1.3
49.8
10-11-72
90.8
Tr
O.I
9.1



















10-24-72
89.9
Tr
0.3
9.8







59.7
0.1
0.7
39-5








H-21-72
87.5
Tr
0.4
12.1



















12-19-73
82.6
0.1
0.6
16.7



















J -23-73
76.9
Tr
0.3
22.8



















2-27-73
75.6
O.I
0.4
23.9



















3-27-73
75.0
Tr
0.3
24.7



















-5-73
77.0
Tr -
0.4
22.6



















7-17-73
77.0
0.4
1.8
20.8



















            * - First letter indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-4B

-------
                                     LABORATORY  6AS ANALYSIS

                                           CELLS C &  0

PROBE
NO.
C-B



C-M



C-T



D-8



D-H



0-T



GAS
COMPONENTS
Cor ton Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
10-9-73
75.0
Tr
0.2
24.8
















22.7*'
0.6
W.I
32.6
12-1H3
52.7
Tr
0.4
46.9












21.5
0.4
27-3
50.8




2-11-74
55.0
Tr
O.I
44.9
















40.8**
0.2
10.5
48.5
3-6-74




















41.4
Tr
0.1
58.5
J-28-74
54.5
Tr
O.I
45.4


















'

4-17-TJj
52.9
O.I
0.3
46.7




















5-28-74
43.1
4.9
14.5
37.5
46.2
0.1
0.4
53.3
29.2
I.I
4.8
64.9








32.8
4.5
13.0
49.7


































































































-

- First  letter  Indicates cell;  second  letter Indicates bottom, middle or  top  probe.
- Surface probe installed as of 9-18-73 due to  blockage of in-cell  probes.
                                                                                           PLATE H-4C
                                               198

-------
                                      LABORATORY  GAS ANALYSIS
                                                CELL E

PROBE
NO.
E-B



E-M



E-T















GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
DATE
12-8-71
























1-3-72
40.7
10.0
1)5.0
4.3
39.0
13.3
46. 4
1.3
50. 8
8.5
1)0.0
0.7












1-18-72
54. 
-------
                        LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                              CELL  A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO})
•.0.0.
Cadnlim
CalcliM
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen pp»
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ era
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ol
Fecal Strep. NPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes iun
Mercury
Nitrogen - Annonla
Nitrogen - Organic
nitrogen -. Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.I, ppb
Potassium
Sodtura
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ral/1
Sulphate
Tosperstura (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
12-15-71






























5.1
12-21-71








1.4
285




















4.8
1-3-72






























4.7
2-15-72
240


44
16200
56
28
* 0.2
1.6
500



<0.5
2.6
0.0006
4.5
15-6
0.0
2.0

4.8
80
724
60

26
17.0
48
2. !
5.0
9-7-72
1300
2250
0
20
3260
56
30
-c 0.08
4.6
1000
* 3
< 3

0. 16
17
0.0034
0
3
0
0

6.6
128
724
70
< 0.1
20
23.5
d30
0.23
5.0
    Units  in mg/l unless noted.
    Temperature of sample when tested for DO,  EC and  pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                              Plate  H-6A
                            LCACHATE ANALYSIS

                                 CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Altai infty
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. KPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Hagnai ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.6. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ral/i
Sulphate
-- n
Tora^erature ( C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
10-11-72
1370
2850
0
48
3630
58
28
0.16
1.4
800
<3
<3
22.5
0.12
18
0.0078
3
14
0.10
<0.l

6.1
161
323
42 '


16.0

0.58
4.7
n-21-72
2160
16.200
<0.03
938
22,4*0
390
350
0.15
O.I
5250
< 3
9.4
750
0.44
590
0.0121)
81
89
0.0
1.4

130
300
11,800
200


10.0
10,000
9.0
4.7
11-30-72








0.4
7000










0





250
7.0


4.8
1-10-73
3920
19.200
•c-0.1
1082
20.300
490
125
0.44
0.8
7250
<3
*J
1050
0.55
760
0.0096
48
42
0.90
2.8

148
338
14,080
98


10.0
12,700
5-5
4.8
2-27-73
2310
12,700
•t-O.QS
440
17,600
424
75
0.06
0.4
5000


945
1.29
608
0.0205
66
29
0.40
1.4

120
288
10,700
14


12.0 .
S400
3-2
5-4
*   Units lii mg/l  unless  noted.
**  Temperature of sample when  tested for DO, EC and pH.
                                                                                                  Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                 Plate  H-6B

-------
                              LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                  CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Hagnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod 1 urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
3-13-73




















0





108




3-27-73































4-10-73
2835
17,500
<0.05
858
18,300
440
450
0.22
0.6
4750


850
1.81
548
0.0014
55
17

1.6

115
272
11,020
16


20.0
9300
3.0
4.9
11-20-73
3600
25,600
*0.05
1603
36,640
1210

0.60
0.6
9500


615
0.86
630
0.0092
328
244
*0.1
16

650

22,880



13-5
13.500
78
5.1
12-13-73
12,650
32,000
^0.05
2,369
55,150
2,148

0.27
1.2
7.800
*3
*-}
960
1.0
1,060
0
371
377
0
10

700
900 .
26,740


916
12.0
18,780
64
5.2
    Units In mg/l  unless noted.
    Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate H-6C
                             LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                  CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c I urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO rol
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Total Sulphides
1-22-74
8,272
28,600
0.072
2,249
44,968
1,225

0.46
0.8
3,100


648
0.33
750
0.045
520
271
0.3
16
0
916
895
22,172



17-5
16,260
57
5.0

3-6-74
6,696
31 .000
0.044
1,883
21,050
1,176

1.08
1 .2
13,000


610
0.27
750
•£0.001
325
137
0.06
4

620
730
19,740



12.5
16,620
32
5.1

4-17-74
4,650
32,950
0.057
2,044
49,560
1 ,174

0.668
1.0
13,000


600
0.408
775
0.021
415
229
0.80
3

812
792
21,632



15.0
17,940
60
5-1

6-1 9-7*
3,162
25,000
0.046
2,244
44,122
1,125

0.38
0.9
15.000
<30
<30
748
0.63
853
0.0044

503
0.19
13
ND
646
683
22,270



20.0
18.840
50
5.3
0

































*   Units In mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO,
EC and pH.
                                                                                                    Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                    Plate  H-60

-------
                         LEACHATE  ANALYSIS

                               CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
1.0. D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO rol
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P. C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
12-7-71
0
13.500

320
15,933
1,475
1 .600

1 .4

>24,000
>2,400


320



66
0.029



15,970
421





4.4
12-10-71
0
15.300

200
1 7,920
998
2,000

<0.5

9.3 xlO5
2. 1 xlO7


550



58
0.084
0


25,028
496





4.2
12-15-71






























4.5
12-21-71
*"







1 . 1
14,500




















4.3
12-28^71
972
32,400

1 .681
42,600
1 ,800
2,500

0.8
12,000
300
1.5 xlO5


924

0.25
170
2.5
0
0


29,663
148
•c. 0. 1


6.360

4.2
    Units  in mg/l unless noted.
    Temperature of sample when tested  for  00,  EC  and  pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                              Plate l'-7A
                             LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                 CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadm I urn
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.8. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-3-72
2360
28,350
<0.25
2950
III ,000
1725

3-6
2.4

< 3.0
2.1 x IO*1

3-0
815
0.006
226
20
1<|
83

1500
1325
42,270
368
-c.0.1

14.0
10,800
11)0
k. 2
1-7-72








7.4
14.000

















12.5


4.4
10-24^72
6880
45 ,000
0.19
161(0
58,1(50
2000
950
0.29
0.5
20,000
6.0
21.00
408
0.95
816
0.0056
780
570
0.4
5.0
0
1560
1550
29,000
1800

980
19.0
17,500
62
5-0
11-30-72
...



61,700



0.2
10,000
<• 3.0
230






0







1070
6.0


5.3
1-23-73
5680
1)0,000
<0.l
1323
51, 400
498
650
0.20
0.3
9500
^3.0
360
425
0.35
344
0.0176
560
388
0
0.8

1180
1072
24,520
124


9.0
14,400
24
5.4
*   Units in rag/1  unless  noted.
**  Temperature of sample when  tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                               Plate H-7B

-------
                              LEACKATE ANALYSIS
                                   CELL  B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *

Alkal inity
B.O.D.
Cadm i urn
Calcium
C.O.C.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. ju mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 nl
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
.Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
3-13-73

4725
22,800
<0.05
1130
32 , 200
1320
275
0.18
0.8
4500
«3.0
93-0
- 348
0.33
378
.0044
480
250
0.1
4.2
0
940
816
17,480
36
-
1036
13-0
10,100
10.8
5-2
11-20-73

4700
47,500
0.09
2164
62,660
1438

0.14
0.1
12,500


500
0.86
840
0
753
521
<0.1
24

1550

33,440



17.0
18,420
73
5-4
12-13-73

14,280
49,500
0.08
2289
74,600
3846

0.15
1.5
8000
3-0
6.2
500
1.0
890
0
925
774
0.24
22

1700
1 710
34,000


1315
15.5
18.060
73
5.6
1-22-74

9,306
45,000
0.073
2,249
63,656
2,243

0.18
1.8
3,400


516
0.45
830
0.075
'917
545
0-. 2
24
0
1,394
1 ,530
30,204
-


16.0
15,960
6)
5.2
3-6-74

7,626
36,000
0.049
!,322
46,782
1,959

0.205
1.2
14,500


415
0.27
645
^0.001
70S
304
0.16
10

1 ,14o
520
21 ,520



14.5
14,940
80
5.4
*   Units In rog/1 unless  noted.
**  Temperatu - of sample when  tested  for  DO,  EC  and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                 Plate H-7C
                              LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                   CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.O.C.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppra
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/1CO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 mi
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total ,. is P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S-.Sr=
Solids - Settle. .T.I/I
Sul pha te
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
4-57-74
6,789
46,000
0.065
2,034
' 35,600
i,446

0.116
1 .4
19,000


460
0.488
815
0.016
• 871
441
0.26
-

1,417
1,«!7
28,104


! , 58C
15.0
18.120
63
5-4
































































































































*   Units in fr>c/i  unless nclca.
**  Temperature of sa-oio •.-:ntn t
                                   vJ  for  00,  Lr.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                   Plate  H-7D

-------
                           LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature** (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
B.O.D.
Caefelu*
Caiclui
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppa
Elect. Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep.MPN/100 ml
Lead
Nagnesiun
Mercury
Nitrogen - Anmonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate-Total, as P

P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
12-15-71






























4.3

12-21-71









1.1)
11,200



















4.7

12-28-71

0
15.900

104)
27.300
750

1300
0.8
9500
230.000
4,300,000

1070

0-33
310
4.3

0.38
0***



15,400
323
<0.1


5-1

1-3-72
II. 0
4900
22,500
<0.25
1700
26,750

2.15
1225
1 .0

4
15,000
< 2.0
725
0.0012
304
186
4.25

3.26


445
820
16.890
260
<0.l
11,520
28
5-1

1-7-72
11.0








0.5
11,400



















5.4

                                        ***Detected .06 ppb Lindane.
* Units  in rog/1 unless noted
"Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Project  102-1.3
Plate  H-8A
                                                            LEACHATE  ANALYSIS
                                                                 CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect .Cond. ^u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.8. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volati le Acids
Zinc
pH
Su 1 pha te
1-18-72
8.5
5*t80
24,600

1200
33.500
700

1200
1.7
11,000
3
"400

760

240
174
3.24
0.030
9.8



15,190
128
<0.l


5-1

2-15-72
19.0
5240
26,400

1200
39,400
750

1120
0.5
1 1 .000



500

550
432
3.8

34.0



19,336
182



5-1
880
3-2-72
16.5
4450
27,000
<0.l
1600
32,620
700
0.6
1100
1.0
10,000


<0.5
550
04014
800
400
3.10

41.7
0.35
845
950
18,444
88

10,100
42
5.1

3-14-72
21 .0
4g4u
28,200

1100
30,500
500

1060
0.3
12,500
3
43,000

410

570
280
4.2

3t



18.025
3:5
<0.»
31.00

5-1
320
3-28-72
18.0
4750
22,950

1000
30,100
820

10)0
0.6
10,000
< 3
150,000

4so

650
296
4.0

34.0
0.40


16.238
144
^.8
9100

5.1

* Units in mg/l unless
 "Temperature of sample
Project 102-1.3
noted
 when tested
                                                                    for  DO,  EC  and  pH.
                                                                                                   Plate H-8B

-------
                               LEACHATE  ANALYSIS
                                     CELL  C
                                                            LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                                                 CELL C
ro
G
in
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/err
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
4-11-72
4,050
20,1.00
<=0. 1
1 ,200
27,9118
880
1 ,700
«£0.25
0.9
9,000
4
7,500.000

< 1 .0
1(50
0.0016
383
297
2.9*1
9.9

837
700
13.358
220
0. 1
1(1.8
17.5
8,1.60
30

4-25-72
3,750
17, 400

1 ,000
2li,300
860
800

O.lt
9,500
<:3
1,300,000


1(50

470
328
4.22
29.1
0


1 1 .960
96
0.2

21.0
8,560

5-2
5-9-72
4,350
21 ,300
<0. 1
980
26,680
810
560
<0.2
0.4
1 1 ,000
<3
230,000

<:! .0
400
0.015
592
312
2.40
40.6

750
800
1 1 ,980
356
<0. 1
448
19.5
9,700
30
5. 1
5-21-72
4, 100
23,700

880
24 ,600
740
400

0.4
9,750
6
43,000


220

656
240
3-6
41.9
0


12,330
84
0.5

19.0
8,720

5-1
6-6-72
3.600
18,000
0. 1
1 ,050
20,276
570
350
0.15
0.2
10,000
92
1 ,600.000

0.8
220
0.0102
632
800
1 .8
40. 3

560
550
10,080
58
0.6
340
20.0
7.730
22
4.9
       *   Units in mg/l unless noted.
       **  Temperature of  sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.

       Project 102-1.3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
6.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli . HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.6. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids • Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
6-20-72
2(00
III, 700

700
20,720
530
350

0.8
8000




200

416
50
-------
                             LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                  CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cmtatua
C«lelu«
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Good, u mhos/ en
Fecal Coll. NPN/IQO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-7-72
3400
10,000
<0.05
570
16.320
323
275
0.07
0.2
6000
6
<3
115
0.22
158
0.0068
306
68
0.5
17.0
0
31.0
312
6800
88
<0.l
131
21.5
6060
7-5
5.0
9-20-72
3100
9200

570
15,130
540
225

1.2
6100




148

282
64
0.5
18.0



7160
78


22.5


4.9
10-11-72
1860
9900

-------
                           LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
2-6-73
1890
10,500
<0.1
480
12,200
526
100
0.06
0.6*"
2900
<3.0
<3.0
176
•<-0.1
116
0.0076
218
42
0.34
3.6

218
260
5260
4


15.0
5040 .
4.6
4.8
2-27-73
1470
9600
<0.05
545
12,900
405
100
0.06
0.6***
3300


278
*0.1
141
0.0209
215
54
0.40
4.2

200
272
5400
26


14.0

4.5
5.2
3-13-73
1575
7300
*0.05
457
10,700
195
75
0.05
0.4
3625
3.0
•0.0
165
O.I
96
0.0071
180
36
0.30
3.0
0
163'
228
4600
56
.
118
15.5
4200
4.3
4.7
3-27-73
1575
9400
<0.05
425
10,100
293
100
0.06
0.4
2200


173

104

176
36
0.32
4.0

165
236
4540
34


16.5

2.8
4.9
4-10-73
1575
9000
<0.05
480
11,200
205
75
0.08
0.3
1500


195
<0.1
108
0.0038
185
19

2.2

190
252
4960
20


20.0
4500
3-5
5-0
*   Units in mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
*** Questionable Result
Project 102-1,3
Plate  H-8G
                                                                  LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                                                       CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. ju mhos/cm
Fecal Coli . HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Armenia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
V.- •
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
4-24-73
1365
9100
<0.05
400
10,800
303
75
0.05
0.7
1950


220
< O.I
98
0.0084
179
28
0.24
12.0

158
228
4800
4


19.0

3.8
5.0
5-15-73
1260
6300
«.0.05
385
9490
254

0.04
. 0.6
1900


175
0
88
0.0048
179
31
0.68
0.8

128
256
4120
28

56
21.0
3900
2.5
5.1
6-5-73
1470
6800
0
417
9860
340

0.05
0.2
2400


220
0
90

196
26
0
4.8



4400 -



18.5

1.8
5.0
6-26-73
1575
8200
*0.05
360
9600
166

0.02
0.5
2050
26.0
*3.0
218
Tr.
86
0.0002
173
22
0.56
1.4

123
226
4960


63
25.0
4380
0.6
5-1
7-17-73
1470
9100
£0.05
321
9300 '
164

0.05
0.3
1750


225
<0.1
93

136
26
0.96
3-0
0
98
244
4152
-

-
20.5

0.72
5.5
                                   *   Units  In mg/1 unless noted.
                                   **  Temperature of  sample when  tested  for  DO,  EC  and  pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                    Plate H-8H

-------
                           LEACHATE  ANALYSIS
                                CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
8.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. a mhos/on
Fecal Coll. HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol Ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
8-7-73
1200
6900
<0.05
353
8574
106

0.04
0.70
2800
-
-
265
0
80
0
159
26
.80
3

110
220
4520



18.5
4200
0.8
5.1
8-29-73
1300
8300

345
9500
154


0.70
2200




90

173
28
0.8
9.2



4600



25.0


6.3
9-18-73"
1400
8300
*0.05
401
9700
125

0.11
-
2100

-
275
0.20
76

168
31
0.56
18

110
166
3768

0.05
72
22.0

0-7
4.6
'fo-9-73
1700
7100
^•0.05
360
8390
125

0.23
1.30
1800


270
0
80

159
26
0.56
6.0



3600



24.0


5.0
10-30-73
1400
7000
<0.05
400
9210
130

0.15
0.6
2700


260
<0.2
82
0
126
17
3.2
8.0

78
180
3750



24.9
3900
0.6
5.1
*   Units in mg/1 unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate   H-81
                               LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                    CELL  C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT * . -.
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Total Sulphides
11-20-73
1500
7900
*0.05
400
10,270
464

0.18
0.6
2,200


250
0.24
110
0
162
20
0.2
18

143

1(760



16.5
4260
1.8
5.3

12-11-73
2652
5850
0
321
7880
1396

0.08
O.It
1500
16
< 3.0
235
0
70
0
129
22
0.16
14

225
184
3604

2.5
132
18.0
3060
0.6
5-1

1-4-74
2,754
4,100

402
8,468
590



2,000




82

143
31
<0. 1
10
0


3,816



18.0


5.6

1-22-74
1,880
V.400 '
0.01
442
9,068
80S

0.04
0.8
1 ,100


232
0.07
86
0.01
129
18
0.2
8

116
164
3,252



18.0
2,880
1.7
5.1

2-12-74
2,452
5,000

289
7,286
1.954


1.4
2,200




81

100
21
0.2
7.2



3,108



12.5


5.2
0.02
*   Units in ng/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO,  EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                    Plate   H-8J

-------
                            LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                 CELL C
. SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Oiganic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
3-6- 7
-------
                                  LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                       ceu o
                            LEACHATE ANALYSIS


                                CELL D
ro
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
T •picture"" ("Q
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
•.0.0.
CadaluB)
Calcium
c.o.p.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
llssolved Oxygen ppra
Elect. Cond. ji mhos/en
Fecal Coll. KPN/ 100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
lercury
Nitrogen - Anmonla
Ultrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potass lim
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH

1-7-72
13.0








0.8
7800


















4.6

1-11-72
8.0








1.1
12,300




















1-18-72
9.0
3050
20,400
O.I
1560
89,520
1300
0.4
1210
1.0
12,000
3-0
9.000,000
.2.0
560
0.003
194
210
4.70
0.080
79.2
0***
910
980
21.010
238
<.0.l
8850
95
4.6

2-15-72
18.5
4450
20,850

1300
26,300
550

1030
0.4
11,000



500

350
270
3.1

41.2



14,196
122



5.0
1040
3-2-72
16.5
4800
22,050
< O.I
1400
29,800
440
0.25
980
I.I
9000


<:0.5
500
0.0058
408
182
1.90

25
0
740
900
16,252
32

8690
40
5.1

       * Units In 09/1 unless noted
      "Temperature of Sample when tested

       Project 102-1.3
           ***Detected .07 ppb Lindane.

for DO, EC and pH.

                                 Plate H-9A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
_ **/o,%
emperature ( C)
Alkalinity (CaC03)
B.O.D.
ladmlum
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Xssolved Oxygen ppm
Mect-Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/ino ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Tola 1 , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle. ml/I
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
3-14-72
19.5
5950
24,000

1200
30,300
270

1020
O.I
12,000
3
23,000

450

378
306
3-0

1*0



15,994
• 88
0.15
8430

5-1
920
3-28-72
17-5
50§0
22,800

1300
31,900
520

1020
0.4
10,000
< 3
43,000

500

360
209
3.80

36.0
0.20


16.948
50
0.4
10.190

5.1

4-11-72
* 17-0
4950
21,750
< 0.1
900
32,330
1700
<0.25
920
0.6
10,000
< 3
2000
1.0
600
0.0028
423
207
3.60

17.8

727
860
16.132
228
<0.l
8,300
40

..79''
4-25-72
20.0 «
4700
19.800

1000
30,700
900

1020
0.5
9000
<3
430,000

550

500
236
4.22

22.1
0


15,240
58
<0.1
10,200

5-2

5-9-72
19.0
5500
23,100
<0.l
1000
33,640
600
tO. 2
1090
0.2
12.500
6
<3
<1 .0
500"
0.0066
580
264
2.38

28.7

727
1020
16,110
409
<0.\
10,900
30
5.2
920
* Units in mg/l unless
**Temperature of  sample

Project 102-1.3
noted
when  tested
for 00, EC.  and pH.
                                            Plate H-98

-------
                           LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Mltrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i um
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
5-23-72
5600
33,600

1300
36,040
1090
360

O.I
12,200
< 3
240


360

720
332
3-1
32.0
0


17,970
40
O.I

18.5
1 1 ,400

5.2
6-6-72
5800
30,600
0.13
1800
34.524
1050
350
0.10
0.2
13,000
9.2
2300

0.5
420
0.0052
880
864
3.0
27.7

760
950
14,610
50
0.6
908
20.0
11,300
30
5.1
6-20-72
4500
33,000

1200
33.040
1100
400

0.2
12,750




420

592
440
6.34
28.1



17.450
34


21.0


5-2
7-11-72
6500
25,950
<-0.1
1320
35,060
1030

0.15
0.4
13,000


180
0.18
500
0.0045
560
142
0.16
12.4

800
880
21,220
75


23.5
10,750
28
5.2
7-25-72
7900
24,400
0.1
1416
36,400
1070

0.16
0.0
15,000


185
0.35
656

612
151



830
944
18,460
97


23.5

28
4.9
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1'. 3
                                                                 Plate H-9C
                              LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                   CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Hercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol Ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72
7700
24,300
< O.I
1440
28,610
1080

0.14
0.3
14,500
3
<3
175
0.64
510
0.0095
570
149
0.08
10.0

780
1010
18,740
420


23-5
12,750

5.3
8-23-72
6000
21,550

1400
34,320
1070
250

0.4
15,200




535

638
156
2.6
23.0



20,540
264


25-0


5.1
9-7-72
7900
21,800
<0.1
1380
33,660
1080
250
0.15
0.1
13,000
9.2
<3
165
0.36
495
0.005
604
161
0.2
16.0
0
740
888
18,900
480
•40.05
600
25.0
12,500
21.5
5.1
9-.20-72
8000
22,500

1430
35,550
1250
290

0.8
14,000




545

596
167
0.2
15.0



20,200
102


22.0


5.0
10-11-72
3430
25,800
< O.I
1402
36,700
1159
290
0.25
0.0
14,000
-: 3
<3
208
0.59
568
0.005
702
190
0
8.0

750
960
19,540
370


18.0
13.600
29.5
5-1
                                                                                                    *   Units  in mg/l unless noted.
                                                                                                    **  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                     Plate H-9D

-------
                                   LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                        CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/en
fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
10-24-72
4500
25,200
0.16
1380
34,840
1200
370
0.10
0.4
15,500


185
0.47
508

630
180
O.I
4.0

800
1010
17,000
80


23.0
12,600
28.5
5.0
11-8-72
1)900
25,800
0.09
1330
33,260
1100
375
0.35
0.2
. 10,000
< 3
< 3
185
0.32
560
0.0008
556
146
0.0
11.0

760
910
17,000
600


20.5
11,200
27.5
5.1
11-21-72
4600
25,200
0.04
1440
34,340
1520
225
0.32
0.05
9000


180
0.37
630

561
137
0.0
3-0

730
800
17,400
600


17.0
12,400
25.0
5-2
11-30-72
4700
27,250
0.05
1354
34,300
1560
260
0.11
0.15
12,000
<3
3
200
0.55
580
0.0035
580
134
0.05
4.4
0
690
880
17.380
412
0
467
14.0
12,800
11.5
5-2
12-19-72
4214
26,200 '
•^O.l
1402
27.250
1565
275
0.07
0.2
9750






522
101
0.4
1.8

584
848
14,980
90


13.0

21.5
5.2
ro
ro
      *   Units in ng/l unless noted.
      **  Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
      Project  102-1.3
                                                                       Plate  H-9E
                             LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                  CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal inity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod ium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-10-73
4410
26,100
<0.l
1426
30,100
1174
150
0.29
O.It
12,250
6
3
200
0.43
560
0.011
474
95
0.50
8.0

656
872
16,900
72


12.0
11,800
21.0
5-1
1-23-73
4214
25.700
•iO.l
962
31,200
1062
100
0.08
0.2
8,600


230
0.40
552
0.0156
513
119
0.08
8.0

740
896
16,440
22


13-0

22.5
5.3
2-6-73
4620
18,200
*0.1
561
31 ,600
1129
75
0.11
0.7*"*
6750
< 3.0
3.0
212
0.23
576
0.0076
498
107
0.18
5.6

740
928
16,720
28


13-0
12,200
17.8
4.8
2-27-73
1680
21,400
<0.05
1322
29,800
1225
175
0.12
0.4
7000


300
0.46
636
0.0209
500
128
0.36
2.2

640
948
16,360
66


13-0

17.6
5-5
3-13-73
4935
20,800
40.05
1400
29,700
1320
150
0.09
0.5
7000


255
0.24
388
0.0084
480
90
0.1
1.8
0
610
888
16,880
72

440
14.0
12,100
16.9
5-0
*   Units in mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
*** Questionable Result
Project 102-1.3
Plate   H-9F

-------
                              LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                   CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Altai inity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron .
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
3-27-73
5460
21,1)00
•TO. 05
1386
29,500
1380
150
0.12
0.3
6000


248

612

516
90
0.2k
6.8

680
904
17,680
50


14.0

17.5
5-3
4-10-73
liA 10
24,200
'0.05
1386
29,100
1115
100
0.08
0.3
6000


275
<0.1
556
0.002
519
61

1.4

610
880
17,28*0
52


17.0
12,300
14.0
5-3
4-24-73
4935
24,100
'0.05
1600
28,500
1160
125
0.06
0.8
6000


290
0.50
604
0.0016
563
77
0.48
3.4

640
856
16,970
68


17.0

15.0
5.4
5-15-73
4515
16,100
^0.05
1218
24,450
1450

0.04
0.5
4800


240
0
672
0.0022
290
34
1.12
4.0

280
880
15,600
32

316
18.7
9900
12.0
4.9
6-5-73
4200
15,800
<0.05
1080
22,700
1565

0.10
0.4
6000


215
0
528

543
74
0.3
2.4



14,800



19.5

7.6
5.5
*   Units in mg/1 unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate  H-9G
                               LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                    CELL  D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calc ium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
.Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
6-26-73
4410
15,500
<0.05
946
21,600
1145

0.08
0.40
5600
20.0
7.0
203
0.31
316
0
551
68
1.60
4.4

260
408
14,600


257
24.5
9540
8.5
5.8
7-17-73
4515
19,400
<0.05
818
18,220
1032
-
0.08
0.40
5100
-
-
205
<=0.1
536

526
80
1.42
3.0
0.6
450
784
13,840
-
-

20.0

17.5 .
5-9
ft- 7-71
4200
11,100
<0.05
•697
15,100
1,051

0.05
0.60
6,000
-
-
185
0.37
452
0
512
74
1.16
3-0

510
784
12,360
-
-

19.2
6480
3.5
,5-1
g-jcj-^j
4300
11,400

577
11,900
993



6,700




428

503
74
1.40
7.2



10,680



24.0
-
-
4.9
9-18-73
4400
8300
^0.05
561
8300
954

0.09
0.40
3900
-
-
85
0.20
396

477
71
1.10
4.0

510
704
5040

0.15
82
23.0

4.5
6.1
    Units in mg/1  unless  noted.
**  Temperature of sample when  tested  for DO, EC and pH.
                                                                                                    Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                    Plate H-9H

-------
                                    LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                         CELL D
                                                                                                                                     LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                                                                                                                          CELL D
ro
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
CadBlura
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride ,
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Tenverature** (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
10-9-73
4500
4400
<0.05
480
5470
964


0.6
4200




368

347
88
1.34
8.0



7600



24.0


6.6
10-30-73
4300
3100
<0.05
521
4650
940

0.12
0.6
8400


54
•CO. 2
360
0
350
48
0.6
4.0

425
770
6770



25.0
1560
3.0
6.6
11-30-73
4200
3200
<.0.05
641
5960
902

0.28
0.4
6000


65
0.24
336
0.004
308
56
0.3
6.0

430

7800



17.5
2160
3.2
6.5
12-13-73
4998
2100
0
602
3550
2148

0.08
0.6
4400
2400
43
50
0.53
345
0.0036
323
68
0.9
7-6

410
670
6424

<1.0
222
18.0
960
2.4
6.7
1-4-74
3,672
1,300

442
2,336
998



3,000




317

283
60
0.5
5.2
0


5,484



14.0


6.4
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Total Sulphides
1-22-74
3,85'.
1 ,000
0.012
402
1.328
1,311

0.03
1.0
1,500


56
0.13
322
0.015
263
<46
0.3
4.0

395
645
5,004



18.0
300
1.6
6.5

2-12-74
4.432
1,100

393
1,352
2,388


0.8
7.000




264

267
45
0-3
3-0



5,148



14.1


6.6
0
3-6-74
3,534
1.200
0.005
361
1,214
1,959

0.045
0.8
8,000


60

-------
                            LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                 CELL 0
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
CadmluB
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppro
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Total Sulphides
5-7-7«.
3,627
280

<»33
823
881


0.7
6,200




3"*0

190
29
0.7
7.7



^,720

.--•

17.5


6.6

5-28-7
-------
                           LEACHATE  ANALYSIS

                                CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO})
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate.
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
12-15-71






























6.5
12-21 -]fl








2. It
3 ,200




















6.5
1-1-72
70it
1 ,730
<0.25
200
1.986
210

0.30
170
450

1 .6
2 ,000
2l|0
24,000


i::

It. 1)0
55:
0.87
2.3



2,186
10.0
0. 1

8.0


6.2
 *   Units  in mg/1 unless noted.
-**  Temperature of sample when tested  for  DO, EC and  pH.
 Project 102-1.3
                                                               Plate  H-IOA
                             LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                CELL  E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal inity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col i . MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volati le Acids
Zinc
PH
2-15-72
620
<<80

130
216
102
420
<0.2
I.I
11)00



•f 0.5
100
0.0005
6.1
13-2
0.6
2.6

8. it
71
1212
5lt

0.0
18.0
552
<0.l
5-7
3-2-72


<0.1




























3-Ht-72
550



2580
300
600

6.6







5.6
27.0
0.8
3.0

25
120
2800
240
rvl
0.0
22.5
It 30

6.5
10-211-72
3720
16,800
0.09
1060
2l»,li50
750
440
0.12
0.6
7000
6.1
2lt,000
1*53
0.60
736
0.0172
220
140
0.3
3-0
0
340
361.
13,200
940

300"
20.0

1.67
5.2
11-30-72
301.0
25,250
0.06
1080
33.300
950
375
0.08
O.it
9000
<3
<-3
483
0.32
51.14
0.006lt
382
132
0
3.2

.610
656
15,400
1»20

Ii56
6.5
11 ,800
6.5
4.9
*   Units in mg/l  unless  noted.
**  Temperature of sample when  tested  for  DO, EC and pH.
                                                                                                   Project  102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                  Plate  H-IOB

-------
                             LEACHATE ANALYSIS
                                  CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c 1 urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol Ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-23-73
4700
33.200
<0.l
1360
41,700
823
175
0.1
0.3
9000
*3.0
3.0
370
0.60
536
0.0144
602
248
0
6.4

1040
880
18,420
60


8.0
13,900
41.0
5.1
3-13-73
11.025
40,000
•CO. 05
1844
58,100
1565
425
0.19
0.6
9500
< 3.0
< 3.0
*78
0.45
676
0.010
690
35
o'
5.6
0
1400
1110
26,680
164

958
14.0
18,100
56.4
4.8
4-24-73
8910
50,500
'0.05
2160
51,900
1760
375
0.32
0.6
8000
3.0
<3.0
520
0.21
896
0.006
895
483
0.40
10.0

1430
1216
31,680
80


17.0
19,200
64.0
5-2
6-5-73
5250
42,800
*0.05
2600
62,000
1565

0.10
0.4
20,000


525
0.42
896

946
531
0
16.0

1320
1264
30,000



19.0

58
5.2
6-26-73
8925
47.300
<0.05
2605
65,600
1830

0.10
0.20
9800
< 3-0
< 3-.0
500
0.73
956
0.0174
946
560
. 0.48
3.6

1470
1344
35,240


1106
29.0
19.560
61
5.3
    Units in mg/1 unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate  H-10C
                           LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                 CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-7-73
8800
45000
<0.05
2164
65600



0.1*0
12000


550
0.69
984

958
571
0.56
32

1520
1368
36000



21.5
22100
32.5
5.3
8-29-73
8000
51000

2200
64500
1910


0.50
11700




944

682
509
0.4
19



35120



27.4


4.8
9-18-73
8600
52000
^0.1
2525
61300
1900

0.13
0.90
7250
-
-
540
0.54
964

963
580
0
19

1630
1200
26880


1284
22.0

62.0
4.8
10-30-73
8300
49,000
«0.05
2525
67.500
2019

0.12
1.0
19,000


590
«0.2
936
0.0084
823
563
<0.1
24

1180
1280
36,400




21,420
68.0
5.4
11-20-73
8800
44,500
•cO. 05
2525
65,060
2085

0.12
O.I
14,000


615
0.65
904
0.0144
848
515
0.6
20

1570

34,640



15.5
21,300
18.0
5.5
*   Units in mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested  for DO,  EC and pH.
                                                                                                    Project  102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                    Plate    A-10D

-------
                             LEACHATE ANALYSIS

                                 CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
1.0.0.
Cwfalun
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. 11 mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO nl
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Hagneslum
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb,
Potassium.. .;;.;•-•'.'
Sodium :. V;:
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids -. T.SLS'.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
P"
Total Sulphides
12-13-73
13,770
46,500
0.07
2369
65.200
2699

0.22
0.09
9000
<3
<-3
625
1.0
630
.07
888
61i>
0
26

1750
1320
32,450


1270
13-0
18,780
18.5
5-5

1 -22-7*
1 1 ,562
40,700
0.073
2,329
65,116
2,176

0.09
0.8
4.500


584
0.38
933
0.05
925
563
0-3
5.0
0
1,599
1,374
32 , 1 88



17-5
20,460
70.8
5-3

3-6r74
11,811
33,000
0.070
2,444
52,853
4,115

0.17
2.4
15,000


700
0.62
1 ,040
^0.001
776
410
0.06
7.2

1,720
1 ,185
33,356



13.5
21 ,960
109
5.5

4-17-74
5.301
42,750
0.068

66,400
4.892

0.372
1.2
19,000


. 540
0.50
933
0.024
834
507
0.30
4

1,542
1,334
30,452


1,614
15.0
21,180
50
5.4

6-19-74
3.720
29,000
0.055
2,806
64,855
2,064

1.44
0.9
15,000
<30
<30
644
0.86
874
o.oot
244
1 ,018
0.33
22

1.063
1,650
30,610



24.0
21,780
85
6.1
0
*   Units In mg/1 unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for 00,
EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                 Plate   H-IOE

-------
                          WATER ANALYSIS

                      WATER  ADDED  TO CELL  C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO.)
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
(2-^-71
0.0
1.0

36
850
73
5

7.6
750

-------
                          WATER ANALYSIS

                        WATER ADDED TO CELL C
                                                              WATER ANALYSIS

                                                           WATER ADDED TO CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
e.o.o. s*~'---
Cadmium, v^y .",-" "~.\
Calcfi*'-. Vr'v, :• ' V:- .•
Chloride *"' :""•
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod 1 urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
7-25-72
330
0
;"• '"o; '"'-':-:
'..;. '22 '.:',•'';':'
57

0.07
6.4
800


0.5
0.15
16
0.0136





7-9
152
536
<0.5

32
23.5
0
0.09
7.3
8-8-72



;V':V;^



7.<>
800

















19.5


7.8
9-7-72


. .-' -. .'*'•*




7.0
825

















23.5


7-9
10-11-72


£"-••••'. -'-"•-
:-\> - -.-.•:



8.0
800

















16.0

'1
8.0
11-8-72

"^ '— .

':'•-'."- . ^ '"



9.4
950

















(4.5


8.0
*   Units in mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.


Project 102-1.3
PlateH-llC
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
AJ_ka;HnJ-ty. :
S.Or.,0. '•• • '•
" \ -"c~ " " ^x *~
Cadmium"^-. -„-.-
'Calcium^
°» V
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Temperature"" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
11-30-72
304
*z
0
.43
2 "
56
it
0.04
9.0
850
<-3
4
0.3
0
11
0.0102
0
0
0.23

0
5.7
132
1)1(0


25
10

0.03
8.0
1-10-73






9.1*
700

















9


7.6
2-6-73






8.6
650

















12.5


l.<*
3-27-73
292
0
28
0
50

0.06
8.8
800


0.20
0
29
0





8.7
12<<
480
0

38
14.0

0.07
7.7
6-26-73
286
0
26
4.0
49

0
6.3
980
<3.0
<-3.0
0.2
0
17
0
0
0
0.56


8.5
24
1040


97
30.1

0.06
7.95
                                  *   Units in  ng/I unless noted.
                                  **  Temperature  of sample when tested for DO,  EC  and  pH.
                                  Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                Plate   H-1ID
                                                                        Reproduced from
                                                                        be$l available copy..

-------
                              WATER ANALYSIS
                          UATER ADDED TO CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/en
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ! urn
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-18-73
294

0
2k
0
50

0.02
8.0
850
-
-
0.3
0.13
15






7.5
126
560


33-0
22.0

0.0
-------
ro
ro
ro
                                   GROUND1MTER ANALYSIS


                                          WELL I
                                                                                                GftOUNDVATER ANALYSIS


                                                                                                       WELL I
SAMPLE DATE -
COMPONENT *
T««p«r.ture**(0C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
i.0.0.
CrtBlun
Calclua
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppn
Elect. Cond. p mhos/en
Fecal Coli . MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep.HPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total, as P
P.C.6. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sul phate 	
1-3-72
15.0








8.3



















7.3

1-18-72
11.0
202
31
<.0.05
78
8.58

<0.2
60
6.8
750
15

<0.5
40
0.0003
0.160

0-30
0.013

0
2.35
96.0
636



0.9
7.3

3-2-72
IS. 5
88
3
*0.l
10
120

<0.2
27
5.8
260
2400


-------
                         GROUNDUATER ANALYSIS

                                WELL I
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. KPN/ 100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
7-11-72








2.9
520

















22.5


7.3
7-25-72
200

0
19



<0.02
k.2
525


0
0
6
O.OOJ7




0
2. It
78




22.0

4D. 05
7. l<
8-8-72








A. 2
500

















21.0


7-3
9-7-72
160

0
10
3
59

0
8.3
500


4.9
0
17
0.035





2.0
98
366


19
22.0

0.08
7.2
10-11-72








it. 8
530

















19.0


7.2
*   Units in mg/1 unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate H-12C
                           GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

                                  WELL 1
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Al kal ini ty
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. KPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPH/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settled ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
11-8-72








it. 8
500

















19.0


7.3
llr30-72
lltO
«2
0
16
2
108

0.05
6.3
600
ISO
460
12.9
0
12
0
0

0.95


1.5
70
560


73
15-0

O.k
7-
-------
                            6ROUNDVATER ANALYSIS
                                  WELL 1
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
I.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature"" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
.3-13-73
38

0
14
3
73

0.08
12.2
380


28
0
18
0





2.9
59
600


72
14.5

0.11
7.1
6-26-73
130

0
14
9.6
50

0.06
2-6
675
*3.0
4.0
27
0
!9
0.0004
0.1
1-3
0.8


4.0
73
960


30
35.0

0.76
7.15
9-18-73
210

0
27
0
73

0.02
4.2
650
-
-
0.8
0
18






1.5
98
600


16
21.6

0.08
6.7
^12-13-73
47
4.8
0
9
6.2
84

0.08
7.4
250
430
24
7.2
0
10
0.0011
0

0.2


1.3
42
176


34
15.5

0.06
6.8
5-7-74
84

<0.01
13
15.6
16.1


-------
                          GROUNDVATER ANALYSIS

                                 WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature**(°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. ^u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Hitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate- Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
1-18-72
14.0
158
1
<0.05 "
8.3
0 -

2.0
25
5-2
400
3

•CO. 5
40
0 . 0004
0 .016

0 .38
0 .003

0
2.12
38
1372



0.8
•7-1

3-14-72
19.0
142
2
0.1
21
6

.01
26
6.3
340
< 3

<1.0
21
0.0009
0-096

O.I



II
27
286



0.3
7.2

3-28-72
16.0
132






31
4.7
350













218




7.0

4-11-72
17.0
132
1
< 0.1
11
I)

< 0.25
19-7
6.6
320
< 3

< 1.0
30
0.00019
0.0





1.4
26.2
272



< O.I


4-25-72
16.0
140






33
6.1
320







0.0





. 208




7-1

* Units  in mg/1  unless
**Temperature of sample

Project  102-1.3
noted
when tested for DO, EC, and pH.
                                            Plate   H-I3A
                                                                                                                               GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature"" (O£)
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Col i . MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep- MPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Kitrogen - nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potass ium
Sod ium
Solids - T.D.S.
Sol ids - T.5.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volati le Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
5-9-72
18.0
136

< 0.1
21
12

<. 0.2
23
6.0
330
7

< 1.0
30
0.0062
0.112

0.09



1.4
3°
198



O.I
7-3

5-23-72
20.0
136






21
3.8
360













228




7.1

6-6-72
19.0
130
9
0.12
1.5
22

0.2
30
7.5
430
< 3

0.15
29
0.0057
0.160

0.05



2.1
28.5
158



C.I4
7-0

7-11-72
19. U








4.5
360


















7.0

7-25-72
23.0








6.2
400










0







7.6

 * Units  in tng/1  unless
** Temperature of sample

 Project  102-1-3
noted
 when tested  for  DO,
                     EC  and  pH.
                                                                                                                                                 Plate H-13B

-------
                            GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

                                   WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. a mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Armenia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72








6.1
360

















20.0


7.3
9-7-72
155

0
20
0
20

0
5-0
380


0.4
0
24
0.0011





1.45
44
212


10
22.5

0.08
7-1
10-11-72








4.2
370

















18.5


7.0
11-8-72








5.2
450

















19.5


7.3
11-30-72
ISO
*1
0
58
1
10

0.03
7-4
360
<3
4.0
0.7
0
16
0.0088
0
0
0.25


0.7
38
238


8
14.0

0.04
7-4
*   Units in mg/l unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate H-I3C
                          GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

                                WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond . ij mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Mitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
I2-19-Z2




















0.2










.1-10-73 ,








5.6
360

















12.0


7.2
2-6-73








6.4
310

















12.0


6.7
3-13-73
134

0
32
1
48

0.05
11.5
450


0.3
0
15
0.0103





1.0
28
160


10
15.0

0.04
7.3
6-26-73
155

0
19
. 10.4
18

0
6.4
260
3.0
4600
1.6
0
22
0
0.3
1.1
0.64


1.4
34
840


8
35.6

0.16
7.1
*   Units in mg/l unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
                                                                                                   Project 102-1.3
                                                                                                                                                                   Plate  H-I3D

-------
                           GMXMDWATER ANALYSIS
                                  WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Hagneslum
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-18-73
164

0
22
0


0.03
-
320
-
-
0.3
0
18






0.9
38
120


21
22.5

0.04
6.7
12-13-73
165
5.5
0
47
10.1
5*

0.05
4.4
360
230
9
0.3
0
19
0
0

0.11


0.8
1)2
268


24
16.0

0.04
6.7
5-7-74
140

40.01
41
0.8
20.7

CO. 01
3.4
380


0.38
<0.01
25.6
0.0015





0.96
24
401


69
18.0

1.0
6.6
















*




















,


























*   Units in mg/1 unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate H-13E

-------
                           GROUNDUATER ANALYSIS
                                  WELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
la^*rature**(°C}
Alkalinity (CaCO})
§.0.0.
CaofcluM
Calcium
C.0.0.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. HPN/IOO ir.l
Fecal Strep.MPM/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Anmonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Tota 1 , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
1-18-72
12.0
118
9
< 0.05
40
0

< 0.2
13
6.0
350
4


-------
                         GBOUUWCTER ANALYSIS

                                WEli 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature' ' (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc .
PH
7-25-72








6.2
400










0






22.0


7.5
8-8-72








6.7
300

















20.0


7.4
9-7-72
120

0
30
0
10

0
it. 6
300


0.6
0
19
0.0009





1-55
33
178


15
22.0

0.06
7-1
10-11-72








4.7
310

















19.0


7-2
11-8-72








5.0
350

















20.0


7.2
*   Units in mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate  H-14C
                          GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

                                WELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium *-•
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/en
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature " (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
11-30-72
110
*1
0
50
1
24

0.03
7.6
300
23.0
93-0
0.1)
0
15
0.00165
0
0
li.SO


0.5
20
210


18
\k.O

0.04
7-2
12-19-72




















0










1-10-73








7.4
350

















12.0


7.2
2-6-73








4.8
360

















12.0


6.7
3-13-73
150

0
40
0
29

0.05
11.2
350


- 0.2
0
25
0.154





0.8
32
160


27
15.0

0.07
7.3
*.  Units in mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when  tested  for  DO,  EC  and  pH.
                                                                                                    Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate  H-I4D

-------
                          GROUNDMATER ANALYSIS

                                 WELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal' Coil. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
7-17-73
109
<7.6
0
37
7.8


0.06
2-9
380
43
930
5.9
0
16
0.0019
0
0.8
2.35


1.6
24
268


21.0
21.0

0.15
7.3
9-18-73
116

0
32
3.1


6
6:7
260
-
-
0.2
0
J3
~s




1-3
2k
2t. 7
300
is
75
1.2
0
13
0.0008
0

3.8


1.2
10
220


31
15-5

0.04
6.8
5-7-7*1
121

iO.Ol
35
13-5
5.17

< 0.01
6.2
260


2.24

-------
                          GROUNOVATER ANALYSIS

                                 WELL i>
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj
B.O.D.
Cadmium
'.a 1 c 1 urn
c.o.o.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. y mhos/cm
Fecal Coli . MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 nl
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Kitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
1-18-72
12.0
106
10
<0.05
200
0

1 .2
27
5.5
300
")3

< 0.5
300
0.0006
0. 16

0.08
0.010

0
2.10
13-0
21)0



0.2
6.8

3-1"<-72
19.5
118
3
<0.l
30
28

<.01
30
6.0
320
<3

t
18.5
262



1.1
6.7

3-28-72
18.0
llii






2i)

-------
                            GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
                                   WELL 4
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72








6.0
310

















18.0


6.6
9-7-72
135

0
32
0
10

0
5.0
300


1.1
0
15
0.0029





1.60
28
186


18
22.0

0.04
6.6
12-19-72
130
0
^0.1
26
0
22

0.02
4.4
330
^3-0
43.0
1.8
0
17.5
0.0086
0
0
O.I

0
1.16
28
288
23

73
16.0

0.06
6.9
3-27-73
100

0
32
1
13

0.06
5.6
380


1.65
0
21
0





1.2
. 17.5
280


35
17.5

0.05
6.4
7-17-73
109
tf.4.4
0
32
6.2
14

0.05
1.2
320
«3.0
«3.0
4.9
0
15

0
0.8
0.38


I.I
25.0
288


74
19.8

0.12
6.9
    Units in ng/1 unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate H-I5C
                            GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

                                   WELL 4
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col i. HPH/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-18-73
130

0
27
3.9
13

0.03
4.6.
260
-
-
0.6
0
16






1-2
22
280


33
20.0

0.03
6.3
12-13-73
118

-------
                             WATER  ANALYSIS  REPORT
   PH. 14131 36S-3329

  EDISON WAV AT 1 1 TH AVENUE
                      WATER. WASTE WATER AND AIR POLLUTION

                                     CHEMISTS AND ENGINEERS
       P. O. BOX 2286
  MKNLO PARK. CALIF. 94O29
                                          ESTABLISHED 1027
                               LABORATORY FACILITIES FOR ALL
                                "STANDARD METHODS" TESTS
REPORT TO •  Terratech,  Inc.
          •  193  E. Gish Road
          .  San  Jose,  California
95112
SOURCE OF , DATE _ /_ _ DATE , /_ /, _
SAMPLE Hammel REC'D a/za REPORTED D////U
AN IONS
Nitrate (NO.)
Chloride (Cl)
Sulphate (SO. )
Bicarbonate (HCO. )
Carbonate (COi )
Phosphate (PO« )
pen LITE*
2.8
38.
11.
181.
0.0
0.1
Total Equivalents Per Million
CATIONS
Sodium (No)
Potassium (K)
Calcium (Ca)
Magnesium (Mg)


PER LITER
20.
0.40
24.
25.

Total Equivalents Per Million
ft* MILLION
0.04
1.07
0.23
3.00
0.00
0.00
4.34

PER MILLION
0.87
0.01
1.20
2.06

4.14
DETERMINATION
Phenolphthalein Alkalinity(CaCO> ,
Methyl Orange Alkalinity (CaCO,)
Total Hardness (CaCOi)
Calcium Hardness (CaCO»)
Magnesium Hardness (CaCOi )
Total Solids - Calculated
Total Solids • Evaporation
Loss On Ignition
Total Fixed Residue




Sp. Cond. - Micromhos 25°C
MibLIORAM*
PCM LITE*
0.0
148
164
60
104
233
245






346
DETERMINATION
Silica ($iO.)
Iron (Fe)
Manganese (Mn)
Boron (B)
Fluoride (F)








Hyd. Ion Cone. (pH)
MILLIGRAMS
PIN LITCR
20
0.77
0.03
0.1
0.33








7.24
       THIC I* AN APPROVED COMMCRCIAL WATER LABORATORY DESIGNATED «Y THE STATE Or CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
COMMENTS:
             ORIGINAL GEOTECHNICAL  INVESTIGATION
                                                        Reported by
'ORM c »'«e
                                                                                  PLATE   H-I6A
                                                       233

-------
                          6ROUNDUATER ANALYSIS

                           CELL ACE SUBDRAIN
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
T«*Mr«ture**<0C>
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
i.O.D.
CadHlun
Calclua
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Ditto! ved Oxygen ppn
Elect. Cond.^i mhos/cm
Fecal Coll .MPN/100 ml
Facal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnes 1 urn
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate- Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potass tun
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
12-8-71
116
0

10
It
5

23





22









216




5.6
1-7-72
15.0







4.*
400


















5.8
2-15-72
16.5







5-5
320


















5-5
3- U -72
17.5







V3
3
-------
                           GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

                           CELL A & E SUBORAIN
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium.
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
IHtrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-7-72
11.0

0
38
8.7
II

0
7.0
825


O.I
0
12
0.0025





0.70
30
186


15
23-5

0.05
6.1
11-30-72
130
0
0
56
0
13
it
0.02
5-6
i<50
<3
<3
0.4
0
16
0.0165
0
0
1.67

0
0.9
22
330


16
15.0

0.03
5.9
1-10-73








9.4
700

















9.0


7.6
3-27-73
ISO

0
46
1
18

0.06
6.0
420


0.13
0
13






I.I
30
220


14
16.0

0.06
6.0
12-13-73
147
<1
0
47
0.8
54

0.05
5.4
320
*3
<3
0.5
0
19
0.0002
0

2.1


1.0
54
244


27
18.0

0.03
6.7
*   Units in mg/1  unless noted.
**  Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
                                                                Plate  H-17C
                          GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

                           CELL A & E SUBDRAIN
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
6-19-74
132
0.5

-------
                    OBSERVATION WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS




                       Depth to Water Level - Feet
DATE
1-18-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
11-8-72
11-30-72
12-19-73
1-10-73
2-6-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
>>- 10-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
7-17-73
8-7-73
9-18-73
12-11-73
1-22-74
3-6-?ii
4-17-74
5-7-74
WELLS
1
6.5
6.0
5.5
5-7
5.5
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.7
6.0
-
6.1
6.1
6.4
6.1
5.9

4.7
4.1
2.8
-
2.7
3.6
3.9

4.3
5.6
2.6
1.0
1.0
1.5
2.8
2
7-0
8.0
6.6
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
8.1
-
8.1
8.2
8.1
6.3
6.4

4.2
3.3
3.8
-
3.6
4.2
7.4

7.9
8.4
4.6
2.3
2.0
*:S
3
8.5
7.0
6.4
6.5
6.3
6.2
6.4
£.6
5.8
7.7
-
8.4
9.1
9.7
6.9
4.7

3.8
2.4
3.8
-
3.8
3.1

7.1
7.6
8.4
3.6
3-5
3;5
\:l
4
18.5
19.0
18.5
18.5
18.7
18.9
18.9
19.0
19.1
19.3

19.4
19.5



17.0



14.1



18.8

18.5
14.0

IB
PIEZOMETERS
1
10.0

5.9

4.6

3.6


2.3
2.4
-
2.2



1.8



0.8


0.7


1.6
1.3

0.8
2
1.0

1.0

1.4

1.7


1.5
1.9
-
1.9



0.3



0.0


0.0


2.5
1.0

0.9
3
None

7.7

5.4

4.0


2.3
2.4
-
2.1



1.8



0.9


0.5


3.2
0.7

1.2
t>






























5






























6






























PROJECT 102-1.3
                                                                   PLATE   H-18A

-------
                           CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
                                                                                                                     CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
ro
GO
-vl
C/ete
12-7-71
12-15-71
12-19-71
12-28-71
1-3-72
1- 1 1-72
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-2B-72
4-1 1-72
4-25-72
9-7-72
10-15-72
10-1 7-72
10-18-72
10-19-72
10-20-72
10-21-72
10-24-72
1 1-8-72
1 1-27-72
12-6-72
12-11-72
12-18-72
12-21-72
(1)
CeM A - Ga'lons

Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
0. 3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
30.8
50. ?
'
80.8
80.8
80.8
81.8
81 .8
81.8
81 .8
81 .8
81 .8
84.3
(2)
Cell B - Gallons
830
833
834
837
838
838
«38
R}8
P,38
83S
838
838
838
-
808
958
1018
IOR3
1093
1 153
1164
1164
1 164
1 164
116
1 164
1 164.5
(3)
Cell E - Gsl'cns

Tr
0. 1
0. 1
0. 3
0.7
0.5
1 .9
2 . 1
2 . 2
2 .2
2 . 2
2 .2
-
-
17.2
-
22 .2
22.2
22.2
23. 7
46.2
71.2
81 .2
?C -2
116.2
116.7
bete
12-26-72
1-4-73
1-1 1-73
1-18-73
1-26-73
2-1-73
2-8-73
2-15-73
2-22-73
3-1-73
3-8-73
3-15-73
3-22-73
3-29-73
4-5-73
4-12-73
4- 19-73
4-26-73
5-3-73
5-10-73
5-17-73
5-24-73
5-31-73
6-7-73
6-l
-------
                                CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
                                                                                                                                      CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
V
•fe-
"5
    ro
    co
    00
Date
7-5-73
7-12-73
7-19-73
7-26-73
8-2-73
8-9-73
8-16-73
8-23-73
8-30-73
9-6-73
9-1*- 73
9-21-73
9-28-73
10-5-73
10-12-73-
10-19-73
10-26-73
11-2-73
1 1-9-73
1 1-16-73
1 1-23-73
1 1-30-73
12-7-73
!2-l*-73
' 12-21-73
12-28-73
l-*-7*
(1)
Cell A - Gallons
1*6.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
: 1*8.5
1*8.5
• 1*8.5
; 1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
183.5
**3.5
667
771
92*
100P
1 lOfi
1213
1363
(2)
Cell B - Gallons
1 171 .0
1171.0
1 171 .0
1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
II 71.0
1171-0
; 1171.0
• 1 1 7 !• . 0
1171.0
: 1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1.171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1206.0
3550
*660
5000
5350
5625
5POO
5975
6225
(3)
Cell E - Gallons
2583.2
2623.2
2670.2
2708.7
27*8.7
27*9.7
2823-7
2859-7
2896.7
2935.7
298*. 7
3021 .7
3051 .7
3090.7
3122.7
3152.7
3182.7
320*. 2
3238.5
3350.5
3700
*! 17
*51*
i(?71
51P3
5503
5917
Date
1-11-7*
1-18-7*
1-30-7*
2-8-7*
2-15-7*
2-22-7*
3-V7*
3-8-7*
3-15-7*
3-22-/*
1-29-7*
li-3-7*
A-12-7*
4-19-7*
i)-26-7*
5-3-7*
' 5-10-7*
5-20-7*
5-2*-7*
5-31-7*
6-7-7*
6-l*-7*
6-20-7*
6-27-7*
7-5-7*
(1)
Cell A - Gallons
1513
1713
1917
201 7
2057
2092
21 67
2207
2287
2337
2*37
2527
; 261 7
2677
27*0
2780
281*
2882
2912
2952
2982
3010
'• 30*2
3066
3091
(2)
Cell B - Gallons
6*75
6775
7500
7610
7660
7730
7820
7880
7980
8050
8200
8350
8500
8560
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
(3)
Cell E - Gallons
6267
6720
7200
7*00
7600
78*0
7990
8090
82*0
8*81
8681
8880
92*0
9*65
96**
9800
993*
10098
10160
1025*
103*1
10*1 7
10*79
105*7
10622
                                        COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                               PLATt H-19 C
                                                                                                                                             COUNTY Of SONOMA
                                                                                                                                                                                    fLATl H-190

-------
                              LYSIHETER SAMPLE FIELD ANALYSIS
Lyslmeter
Location
Cell A -
4 feet below
bottom of Cell







Cell A -
8 feet below
bottom of Cell








Cell E -
8 feet below
bottom of Cell







Date

1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
4-10-73
7-17-73
12-13-73
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
4-10-73
7-17-73
9-18-73
12-13-73
12-15-71
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
li-10-73
7-17-73
Volume
ml
200
30
30
70
50
30
50
blocked
52
40
400
200
50
240
250
400
150
0
91
100
300
50
300
35
50
35
50
30
50
blocked
blocked
pH

5.6
7.1
7.1
6.5
8.4
5.9
6.5

5.9
5-9
5.7
7.0
7-4
6.9
7.3
6.4
6.8
-
6.7
-
6.0
7-4
6.6
7.4
6.9
7.1
8.3
7.2
7.0
-
"
D.O.*
Ppm
5.0
8.4
7-8
9.0
-
9.0
-
.
2.4
5.8
1.3
9-3
8.1
10.0
9.2
9.6
10.2
-
4.0
-
8.2
_
5.9
8.7
8.0
10.4
-
8.9
-
-

E.C.
p mhos/cm
380
-
-
.
-
-
-**
.
290
140
310
_
.
.
160
275
300
-
400
240
300
.
290
.
-
.
-
-
.**
-

ro
CO
10
           Water  samples are collected  from  lyslmeters by displacing the sample with
           air from a pressurized  tank.  This procedure  thoroughly aerates  the sample.

            Insufficient quantity for  D.O. or E.C.  tests.
          Project  102-1.3
PlateH-2IA

-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
NOV.
1971
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

ruTALS
RAIN-
FALL




»






0.29
0.25


0.02












0.96


1 .52



































RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
































TOTAL
SALLOWS
































CELL B
METER
READING
































TOTAL
GALLONS
































REMARKS
No Evaporation <
runoff data was
for this month .
evaporation reported In Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                PLATE H-23A
                                                                                                      RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND  RUNOFF
DEC.
1971
1
2
3
'(
5
6
	 Z. 	
8
•3
--.1°
II
_._!?._ _
it
• 5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
f'.'TALS
RAIN-
FALL

0. 50
0.32
0.2*
0/27
0.09
0.03
0-77
0.05



0.51
0.22
0.06


1 .77

0.03


4.86






	











RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METtR
READING











TOTAL
GALLONS











CELL B
METER
READING








TOTAL
GALLONS
..





REMARKS
Mo evaporation or
runoff data was taken
for this mon th .
                                                                                  Evaporation reported in Inches




                                                                                                              COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                                                                                                      PLATE  H-23 B

-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1972
1
2
3

-------
                    RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MARCH
1972
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL

0. 10
0.08






0.05














0.25






0.1)8


.160
. 128
.032
.077
.077
. 192
.077
.160
.064
.128
.128
.077
.064
.128
. 128
.192
.064
.077
.077
.064
.064
.077
.077
.077
.064
.288
. 160
.064
.064
. 160
.064
3.253
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
NETER
READING
732























732







TOTAL
GALLONS
























0






0
CELL B
METER
READING
420























420







TOTAL
GALLONS
























0






0
REMARKS '
Evaporation and r
meters were opera
as of March 1st.
Runoff meter read
are the initial r
after test i no. .
cvaporation reportedin Inches




                            COUKTY OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE H-23 E
                                                                                                                          RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
APRI L
1972
	 1
2
3
•')
5
6
	 1 ..
8
•3
10
1 1
12
_Ji.
'1;
_!.5_
16
I?
16
_.l? 	
	 20 	
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
f'.'lALS
RAIN-
FALL

0. 15
0. 15
0.58
0. 26
	
r .22





1.36
rvAP.
.06li
Tils'
.077
"'.'192
.077
. I2P
.0614
. 160
. 160
. 160
. 16"
. ICO
. 160
. 160
. 160
. 160
. 160
.256
. .-.2.56.
.256
^256
.256
.256
_:J_5A
.256
.256
.256
.256
* A
**
**
5. 1*6
RUNOFF
CELLS A
METER
READING
732
732
732
712.
732

.


& E
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
.0 	
0
_

0
CELL e
METER
READING
420
420
420
4-2 Q
^*

TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
Q 	
0

0
REMARKS
* Ran flow test on
drainage meter. This
flow was not due to
rainfal • runoff.
** Evaporation a a n »> was
beinn repaired and
recordtna o" these
dates .
rvaporat.on reported in Inches




                            COUIiTY OF SONOKA
                                                                    PLATE H-23 F

-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFr
                                                                                                                          RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFr
HAY
1972
1
2
3
it
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
U
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 It
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL































0.00



*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.128
.256
.788
.288
.256
. 128
. 128
. 160
. 160
. 192
.128
. 160
.077
.221)
-077
. 128
.077
.061.
.064
.256
. 160
. 160
3.559
RUNCFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
732































TOTAL
GALLONS
0






























0
CELL B
METER
READING
549































TOTAL
GALLONS
0






























0
REMARKS
* Evaporation gage was
belno repaired and
was not available for
recordinq on these
dates.

Evaporation reported In Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
JUNE
1972
1
2
3
'4
_J_
6
8
_..9...
10 _
II
	 _I2 	
>3
U
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
-------
                    RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JULY
1972
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
II
12
13
i i*
1 '5
1 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2k
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL































0.00



.397
. 160
.192
.192
.192
.077
. 160
.160
.320
.800
.197
.112
.768
.896
.576
.320
.224
.256
.128
.128
. 160
. 160
.064
.192
. 160
.192
.320
-192
. 160
.128
.224
9.111
RUNOFF
CELLS A £ E
HETER
READING
732































TOTAL
GALLONS
0






























0
CELL B
KETER
READING
549































TOTAL
GALLONS
0






























0
REMARKS
evaporation reported in Inches
                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE H-23  I
                                                                                                                          RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION  AND  RUNOFF
AUG.
1972
_ 1
2
3
•t
5
6
	 Z_ .
8
1 ..'3
10
II
12
13
it
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
21.
. JJ 	
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL



TR


	







TR
CVAP.
.288
. 192
. 128
. 160
.320
. 192
.221.
.221.
. 160
.128
^•J.28
.320
,320
.205
.192
.077
.22li
. 160
._: ° 7 ?
. 192
.221.
.268
.256
.352
.384
. 192
. 192
. IS2
. 128
.192
.128
6.439
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
-----
763
1 168




TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0



0
CELL B
METER
READING
783
1569




TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0


0
REMARKS
* Meter F 1 ow due
Testinn nnd A d j
evaporation reported in Inches




                            COUiiTY OF i
                                                                                                                                                                           PLATE  H-23 J

-------
                    RAINFALL.  EVAPORATION AND  RUNOFF
SEPT.
1972
1
2
3

-------
RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
                                                                                                  RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFr
NOV.
1972
1
2
3
It
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
•3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 It
25
26
27
28
29
30

TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL


1.33
0.01


0.56


0.70
0.34

1 .06

2.09
0.27

0.04
0.14












6.5"t



.064
.077
.032
.000
.064
.064
.064
.288
.128
. i?a
.224
. 192
. 160
. 160
. 192
.288
.288
.256
.128
.224
.096
.192
. 192
. 128
.064
.064
.320
.224
. 160
.064

*.525
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
2221


4889


6183
6670


8150

nooo

23600
25790










25800


25800


TOTAL
GALLONS



2668


1249
532


1680

4650

10600
2190










10


0

23579
CELL B
KETER
READING
5087


6500


7*38
7588


8240

10050

15560
16320










16380


16380


TOTAL
GALLONS



1413


93?
ISO


652

1810

5510
760










60


0

11293
REMARKS
evaporation  reported in
   I
DEC.
1972
	 1
2
	 3 	
;i
5
6
. 	 7 .
8
•}
10
11
12
'3
":
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2??
.000
_;932
.288
.256
. 192
. 320
.416
.320
.320
^1-2
. 128
. 128
.000
.096
.096
.000
.032
.000
.000
.000
.256
.032
. 352
.861.
. 160
.O6'i
.1180
.352
.288
.736
6.lt32
iUIHCFF
CELLS A s E
METER
READING
25«00
25800
27410
28790
36000
41460
41490

141490
41490

._ 	

TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
1610
1380
72 10
51)60
30

0
0

—
15690
CELL 8
METER
READING
16 3RD
_ 16380
16910
17540
19280
2 1880
2 IB80

2 1880
21880


TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
530
630
1 746
2600
0
0
0

5500
R
        COUNTY OF  SONOMA
                                              PLATE H-23 M
                                                                               evaporation reported in  Inches


                                                                                                         COUIiTY OF 50NOHA
                                                                                                                                        REMARKS

                                                                                                                                          Meter failed durino
                                                                                                                                          this  period  at runoff
                                                                                                                                          Mete r repaired.
                                                                                                                                                PLATE  H-23 N

-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL







1.20
1.03
0.22
3.07
2. 71


0. 10
2.17

1.81

0.50



0.24
0. 16



0.69
0.08
0. 16
III. 16



.800
.224
• 352
.288
.244
.256
.000
.032
.064
.064
.032
.000
.061)
.192
.096
.224
. 160
.224
.416
.224
.128
.128
. 128
.064
.288
.256
.288
.288
.128
. 160
.244
6.036
aUNOTF
CELLS A & E
NETER
READING



41490



45870
509*0
51830
71700
91800


91810
106250

1 19800
119800


121890
121890
121890
122610
122610


124500
126JBO
126940

TOTAL
GALLONS



0



4380
5070
890
19870
20100


10
14440

13550
0


2090
0
0
720
0


1890
1880
560
85450
CELL B
METER
READING



21880



24080
263*0
26780
36540
45790


45920
51960

57*10
57630


58060
58060
58060
58270
58270


58560
59100
59170

TOTAL
GALLONS



0



2200
2260
440
9760
9250


130
6040

5670
0


430
0
0
210
0 *


290
54§
78
37290
REMARKS
* Cell "B" runoff
metering device m
f unet i on . Resu 1 t
quest i onab 1 e till
2/17/73.



Fvaporation reported In Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                 PLATE H-23 0
                                                                                                       RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
FEB.
1973
1
2
3
'4
_5_
6
	 7__ _
8
•3
	 10
1 1
12 _
"3
U
15
16
17
	 l£
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL

0.05
0.40
1 .01.
°.-35
0.92
.. P.-P*.
0.06
0.86
-£..29
0.05
0.22
0.59
0.86
0.01

• 	

0.76
0.01
..-0--96
1 .04
0.03



8.54
FVAP.
.288
_.L9-2.
.22',
. -J2Q
.• L9.2.
.128
.192
. 160
. 160
.096-
....124
.096
• !28
.288
.288
.2P8
.288
.38".
.256
.416
.544
.256
.288
.384
.320
.22'.
.096
.224



6.944
3UNCFF
CELLS A $ E
METER
READING
I26J40
126950

136560
143150
143190
160860
160860

160860

163423
172760




TOTAL
GALLONS
0
10

9610
6590
40
'767_0J
.0
0

2563
-
9337


45820
CELL B
METER
READING
._59I70
-53LL70
62350
64990
64990
71790
71790

71860

73530

78680



TOTAL
GALLONS
A
0
0
3180
2640
0
6800
J. J.
o"'
70

1670

5150


19510
REMARKS
* Cell "B" runoff
meter i ng dev i ce
malfunction. Resu
questionable, til
2/17/73
                                                                                   Fvaporation reported in Inches




                                                                                                               COUIiTY OF SONOMA
                                                                                                                                                       PLATE H-23P

-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND  RUNOFF










ro
-e»
00
MARCH
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
"3
111
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.04

0.86
0.01

0.47

0.38

0. IB








0.56

0.32








0.58

3.40



.288
-352
.064
.192
.224
.256
.288
.320
.288
.046
. J84
.576
.800
.736
.288
.256
.416
.120
.064
.416
.384
.384
.544
.224
.256
.288
.544
.640
.448
.032
.448
10.816
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
176440
176440





183210






183210






184780






184780



TOTAL
GALLONS
3680
0





6770






0






1570






0


12020
CELL B
METER '
READING
81030
81030





86 1 30






86300






87710






87710



TOTAL
GALLONS
2350
0





5100






170






1410






0


9030
REMARKS
c=> • •
Fvaporation reported In Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE H-23Q
                     RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
APRIL
1973
	 1
2
3
'i
5
6
_!-_
8
.___•)
JO
II
._ 12.
i':
	 ]S 	
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL


0.19
. ._..









0.19
F.VAP.*
__-UJ
1. 153
.80C
.eoc
.512
.48?
.60S
.672
.672
.76?
.-,320
.480
.320
.381
.480
.192
.640
.640
.640
.961
1 .280
.640
.640
.608
.576
.224
.286
.320
.352
.640

17.674
3UNCFF
CELLS A £ E
METER
READING
185780
185780
185780
185780
185780

18780


185680


TOTAL
GALLONS
1000
0
0
0
0

0
---
0

1000
CELL B
METER
READING


R84V:
88440
88440

88440
88440


TOTAL
GALLONS
730
0
0
0
0
0
0

730
REMARKS
^Evaporation  reportedinInches




                             COUNTY OF  i
                                                                    PLATE H-23

-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
HAY
1973
1
2
3
it
S
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
Id
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL























0.07
o.ot






0.38



.320
.320
.381.
.412
.1.1,8
.544
.736
.832
.1.12
1 . 152
.800
(,fin
f:f(,
.SM
.5
-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND  RUNOFF
JULY
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
'3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
21)
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
IX'IALS
RAIN-
FALL






























f
0.00



.768
.800
.736
1.376
.928
.896
.768
1 . 120
1. 120
.128
.800
.736
.512
.480
.320
-352
.352
.*16
.6*0
.704
.736
1.3**
.961
1.18*
1.50*
1 .50*
.70*
.*16
.1.1.8
. 1.1)8
.576
24.577
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING




185780






185780






185780






185780






TOTAL
GALLONS




0






0






0






0





0
CELL B
METER
READING




88**0






881)40






88440






88440






TOTAL
GALLONS




0






0






0






0





0
REMARKS
rvaporation reported in Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE  H-23U
                    RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
AUG.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
	 9 ___
10
11
12
,3
ll!
)5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL































0.00
tVAP.
.352
.448
.480
.576
.640
.384
.480
• 352
.448
.640
—^l*
	 OZ3
. 704
.640
.896
.736
.544
.5<-4
.(•40
-73C
.£40
.^•72
.736
. ROD
.576
.544
.384
-576
. 704
.480
.736
17.984
RUNOFF
CELLS A £ E
METER
READING

185780






185780






185780
	



185780



._.

185780


TOTAL
GALLONS

0





0






0





0






0

0
CELL B
METER
READING

88440






R8440
	



88440





RP440






88440


TOTAL
GALLONS

0




0

— - -



0






0






0

0
REMARKS
Fvaporation reported in Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOKA
                                                                                                                                                                         PLATE  H-23V

-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
SEPT.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1*4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL


















0.05
0.30


0.35

0.05






0.75
EVAP.
• 352
.1(16
.416
.480
.480
.544
.993
1.888
.961
.416
.416
.416
.416
.416
.320
.320
.320
.320
.320
.320
.448
. 160
.608
.480
1 .025
1 .025
1 .025
.736
.416
.224

16.67"
RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METER
READING-





185780







185780






185780






185780




TOTAL
GALLONS





0







0






0






0



0
CELL B
METER
READING





88440







88440






88440






88440




TOTAL
GALLONS





0







0






0






0



0
REMARKS
Evaporation reported Tn Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE H-23 W
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
OCT.
1973
1
2
3
'4
s
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL





0.10

0.18










.

0.30
0.60
0.20








1.38
EVAP.
.416
.544
.846
.736
.736
.224
. 320
.128
.416
.608
.384
.576
. 704
.672
. 128
.768
.864
. 736
.416
. 192
-576
. 160
.224
.416
. 352
.384
.576
.928
1.536
.640
.320
16.544
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING




185780






185780






185780






185870






TOTAL
GALLONS




0






0






0






90





90
CELL B
METER
READING




88440






88440






88440






88600






TOTAL
GALLONS




0






0






0






160





1 60
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
                                                                                                                                  COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                                                                                                                          PLATE H-23 X

-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION  AND  RUNOFF
NOV.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Mi
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL




2.20
0.16
0.70

1 .09
1.10
0.90
0.21
0.30
0.62
0. 50
0.63
1.10

i
o. 38

0.25
0.09

0.03



0. 10
0.80

11.16



.320
.285
.416
.320
.064
.06'
.000
.256
.06'
. 12!
.09*
.22'
.I2f
.224
.096
.064
. 160
.48C
.352
.256
.22'
. 128
. 160
.4161
.22'
.256
. 192
.352
. I2P
1 Q

6.27
RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METER
READING

185870



186370


186910




195120

198250


203970
20*940


204940


204940



205520


TOTAL
GALLONS

0



500


540
4



R210

3130


5720
970


0


0



5TO

19650
CELL B
METER
READING

88600



f>9200


89730




94520

9C500


99350
lonioo


100170


100170



100390


TOTAL
GALLONS

0



600


530




479C

1980


2850
750


70


0



220

1 1 790
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE H-23 Y
                    RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
DEC.
1973.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
I'l
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.59





0.02


0.46

0. 20



0. 30



O.K6

0.02


1 .32
1.37
0. 18
0.1)2

0.02
4.76
EVAP.
. 192
. 1?2
. 12P
.064
. 192
.27.1-
.032
.032
.Of 1)
.064
.256
. 12P
.0<»6
. 064
.O.f
-------
                    RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1974
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL


2.18
0.10
0.19
0.17




o.oq
0.06

1.55

1.23
0.02
0.25
O.OS











0.55
6.4'
EVAP.
.512
.576
.096
.192
.064
.064
.224
.224
. 160
.064
.064
.032
.064
.000
.384
. 128
.096
.064
.096
. 160
.480
.736
.832
.480
.192
.352
.640
.640
.640
.128
.032
8.416
RUNOFF
CELLS A 6 E
HETER
READING



237050






2T7190






252380











252380


TOTAL
GALLONS



10730






140






15190











0

26060
CELL B
HETER
READING



122180






122580






132660











132660


TOTAL
GALLONS



7980






400






10080











0

18460
REMARKS
Evaporation reported In Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE H-23 AA
                                                                                                                          RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
FEB.
1974
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.09










0.22



0. 29

0.90
0. 35

0. 10




0.01

0.89



2.8!

EVAP.
.2211
. 352
.256
.192
.672
.993
.it *i8
. 352
.416
. 352
. 160
. 192
. 192
.256
. 160
.288
.288
.06lt
.381.
.320
. 128
.320
. 352
.448
.288
. 192
.256
.128



8.673
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING







252840






252840






257950










TOTAL
GALLONS







1(60






0






5110









5570
CELL 8
METER
READING







133300






133300






1 36940










TOTAL
GALLONS







640






0






3640









4280
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches




                            COUHTY  OF SONOMA
                                                                    PLATE H-23BB

-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MAR.
197ll
1
2
3

-------
                    RAINFALL,  EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
HAY
1974
1
2
3
it
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL































0.00



.1.16
.352
.256
.224
. 160
.288
.224
.320
.608
.586
.1(80
.608
.512
.640
.704
.640
.544
.352
.608
.704
.512
.256
.800
.768
.576
.896
.704
.288
.512
.544
.416
15.498
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING


286370






286370









286370



286370






286370

TOTAL
GALLONS


0






0









0



0






0
0
CELL B
METER
READING


159050






159050









159050



159050






159050

TOTAL
GALLONS


0






0









0



0






0
0
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches




                            COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23EE
                                                                                                                         RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JUNE
1974
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
U
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL

















0.02













0.02
EVAP.
.352
.381.
.1.1.8
.961
.961
.961
1 .21.8
1.952
.61.0
.61.0
.1(16
. T;2
.512
. 51. It
. 544
.1(16
.1)16
.256
.512
.608
.608
.512
. 1*1.8
. 416
. 768
. 768
. 86<<
1.121
.961
.1(80

20.069
RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METER
READING






286370






286370





286370






286370





TOTAL
GALLONS






0






0





0






0




0
CELL B
METER
READING






159050






159050





159050






159050





TOTAL
GALLONS






0






0





0






0




0
REMARKS
                                  Evaporation  reported  in  Inches




                                                             COUKTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23FF

-------
                                   SETTLEMENT DATA
                                                                                                                                          SETTLEMENT DATA
r\a
CELL-
MONUMEN'T
A-l
A-2
A-3
A- 4
A-5
3-1
B-2
6-3
8-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-k
C-5
0-1
0-2
D-3
0-4
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-4
E-5
DATE
1 1-I6-/I
280.89
280.3*1
280.36
280.76
280.59




















11-22-71
280. *7
279.91
279.83
280. 15
279.98




















11-23-71
280.57
280.09
279.98
280.30
280.20




















12-6-71
280.45
279.95
279.81
280.08
279.96
307.28
307. 10
306.99
306. *3
307-M















12-10-71




















281.27
281.14
281. 15
280.70
280.85
12-14-71










307.93
307.85
307.79
307.79
307.53










CELL-
MONUMEKT
A-l
A-2
A- 3
A-4
A-5
3-1
E-2
6-3
6-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
0-1
0-2
0-3
D-4
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-'i
E-5
DATE
12-21-71
280.52
279-94
279.88
280.23
280.03
307. 15
306.92
306.69
306.20
306.87










280.90
280.73
280.72
280.35
280.60
12-28-71















306.97
307.21
306.82
305.91
306. 16





12-30-71
280.39
279.95
279.82
280.09
280. II
306.95
306. 74
306.48
305-94
306.61
307. <•?
307 .44
307.26
307. 40
307. 13
306.55
306.77
306.27
305.55
305.59
280. 70
280. 57
280.1(7
280.20
280. 34
1-7-72
280.52
280.03
279.92
280.23
280. II
306.97
306. 75
306.52
306.03
306.67
307. 44
307. 38
307. 19
307. 33
307.06
306.51
306.76
306.27
305.57
305. 6
-------
                                     SETTLEMENT DATA
                                                                                                                                           SETTLEMENT DATA
IVi
cn
CELL-
MONUMEKT
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
3-1
D-2
6-3
B-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
0-2
D-3
D-4
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-'i
E-5
DATE
1-31-72
280. 5 1
280.00
279-91
280.22
280. 10
306.95
306.72
306.50
306.01
306.65
307. 40
307.34
307.14
307.26
307.01
306.45
306. 70
306. 19
305.55
305.56
280.91
280.71
280.73
280.45
280.67
2-14-72
280.50
280.01
279.91
280. 22
280. 10
306.95
306.72
306.49
306.00
306.64
307. 38
307. 31
307. 12
307.26
307.00
306.42
306.68
306. 17
305.48
305.54
280.90
280. 70
280.72
280.44
280.67
3-2-72
280.52
280.03
279.91
280. 23
280. 10
306.95
306.72
306.48
306.00
306.63
307. 37
307.31
307. 11
307.25
306.99
306.41
306.68
.306. 16
305.48
305.53
280.91
280.71
280.72
280.45
280.67
3-31-72
280.49
280.01
279.90
280.22
280.09
306.93
306.71
306.47
305.99
306.62
307.35
307.28
307-03
307.22
306.96
306.39
306.66
306. 13
305.45
305.51
280.89
280.67
280.70
280.43
280.65
4-28-72
280. 50
280.02
279-91
280.22
280. 10
306.93
306. 71
306.46
305.98
306.61
307. 33
307-26
307-06
307.21
306.93
306.37
306.65
306. 1 1
305-43
305.49
280.89
280.68
280.71
280.44
280.65
6-1-72
'280.50
280.02
279.89
280.21
280. 10
306.93
306. 70
306.46
305.98
306.61
307-32
307.24
307.05
307. 19
306.90
306.36
306.64
306. 1 1
305.42
305.48
280.88
280.65
280.71
280.44
280.64
CELl-
MONUMEK'T
A-l
A- 2
A- 3
A-4
A-5
G-l
D-2
6-3
6-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
D-2
0-3
D-l.
D-5
E-l
E-2
£-3
E-'i
E-5
DATE
8- 17-72
2 80 I it 8
280.01
279.89
280.21
280.09
306.89
306.67
306.') 1
305-95
306.57
307.28
307. 19
306.98
307. 14
306.81.
306.31
306.59
306.03
305.36
305.39
280.86
280.61
280.67
280. 1.2
280.61
10-13-72
280.1.8
279.99
279.88
280.20
280.08
306. 88
306.66
306. bo
305-94
306. 56
307.25
307. 15
306.95
307. 1 1
306.80
306.28
306.56
305.99
305. 33
305.36
280. 85
280.60
280.66
280.'.!
280.60
1 1-20-72
280.1.6
279.98
279.86
280. 18
280.06
306.86
306.6<>
306. 
-------
                                  SETTLEMENT DATA
CELL-
HONUMEKT
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
B-l
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
D-2
0-3
O-ll
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-'<
E-5
DATE
10-2-73
280. 43
279.96
279.8li
280. 16
280.04
306.83
306.62
306. 36
305.90
306.52
307.20
307.06
306. 86
307.05
306. 71
306.21
306. A3
305.85
305.24
305.20
280. 79
280. 52
280.60
280. 35
280.53
I-*-?*
280.1)2
279. 9*
279.82
280. |1>
280.03
306.81
306.61
306.34
305.89
306.50
307. 16
307.03
306.83
307.02
306.68
306.19
306. 38
305.81
305.22
305.01
280.77
280.52
280.58
280.34
280.50
4-2-74
280. 42
279.94
279.82
280. 14
280.02
306. 80
306.60
306. 34
305-88
306.50
307. 16
307.01
306.82
307.01
306.67
306. 17
306.34
305.77
305. 19
304.96
280. 77
280. 52
280.58
280. 33
280. 50
7-3-74
280.40
279.92
279.80
280. 12
280.00
306.79
306.59
306.32
305.87
306.49
307.15
307.00
306.81
307.01
306.66
306.07
306.24
Disturbec
305.09
304.83
280.75
280.48
280.56
280. 31
280.47




















































ro
01
oo
                                  COUNTY OF SONOKA
                                                                          PLATL  H-24  E.

-------
                     FLUID  ROUTING  CELL "C"

Date

1971
*
12-30

12-31

1972
T-^3

1-4

1-5

1-7

l-IO

1-H

1-12

1-13

1-14

1-17

1-18

1-19

1-20

1-21

1-24

1-25

1-26

Leac
Start
(In)


5.8

6.5


7.8

7.9

7.9

8.5

8.6

8.8

8.8

9.0

9~.0

9.4

9.5

9.6

10. 1

12.4

28.4

33.2

40.3

ate Co
End
(In)









































1 lection
Total
(In)









































Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)

2000*







































2000
0
2000
Distribution
Start
(In)


68. 1

73.5


73.5

73.5

73.3

73-2

73.5

68.0

73.5

73.5

73-5

74.3

72.7

72.6

73.2

83.5

73.8

72.3

73.3

End
(In)



1 .0

1 .0


1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1.0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0
Total
(In)



67.1

72.5


72.5

78.5

72.3

72.2

72.5

67.0

72.5

72.5

72.5

73.3

72.7

72.6

73.2

83.5

73-8

72.3

73.3
?n?strihgiion
Dl strlbut Ion
Prior She>»f
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal

14933*

803.2

868.4


868.4

868.4

865.4

865-4

868.4

802.5

868.4

868.4

868.4

877.4

870.5

869.0

876.2

999.5

883-4

865.4

877.4
31467
0
31467
Fluid
Ret . In
Refuse

12933









































*8,000 gallons applied by water truck during refuse placement.
 6,993 gallons applied by 2.27"total rainfall during refuse
 placement operation.
                        COUNTY OF SONOMA                PLATE H-25A
                                                                                                          FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"

Date

1972
1-27

1-28

1-31

2- 1

2- 2

2-3

2-14

2-7

2-8

2-9

2-10

2-11

2-12

2-13

2-14

2-15

2-16

2-17

2-18

2-19

Leac
Start
(In)

49.4

60.6

39.5

9.4

19.5

31.1

1.2.2

34.8

II .0

22.8

34.0

35. 1

45.6

25.1

39.3

53. 1

14.4

34.3

58.3

32.4

late Coll ect i on
End
(In)



1 .0

1 .0







1 .4

2.0





24. 1

22 . 7

1 .0





1 .k





6.0



Total
(In)



59-6

38.5







40.8

32.8





9.9

12.4

1.4.6





51 .7





52.3



Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)



713.4

460.8







488.4

392.6





118.5

271.7

533.9





618.8





626.0



4224
2000
6224
01 st r i but Ion
Start
(In)

72.8

74.3

72.5

73.0

71 .5

oo.o

00.0

71.4

72.2

72.4

72.5

72.9

1 .0

1 .0

72.5

72.4

72.2

72.5

72.5

72.6

End
(In)


0.0

0.0

6.7

0.0

0. 0

0.0

0.0

0.0

1 .0

I .5

1 .6

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .2

1 .0

1 .0

1 .4

1 .0
Total
(In)


72.8

74.3

65-8

73-0

.71.5

00.0

00.0

71.4

71.2

70.9

70.9

71 .9

00.0

00.0

71 .5

71.2

71 .2

71 . 5

71.1

71.6
?h?rine'.i°n
01 st r ibut Ion
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal


871 .4

889-3

787.6

873.8

855.9

000.0

000 .0

854.7

852.3

848. 7

84R. 7

860.6

000. 0

000. 0

855.9

852. 3

852. 3

855.9

851 . 1

857. 1
13668
31467
45135
Fluid
Ret . 1 n
Refuse



29625

30054







32082

31690





34127

34704

35031





35268





37202





COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                                                                                             PLATE H-25

-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"

Oat*

1972
TTo

2-21

2-22

2-23

2-24

2-25

2-26

2-27

2-28

2-29

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

3-7

3-8

3-9

3-10

3-M
Leae
Start
(In)

60.3

33.2

62.2

31.1

67.5

24.0

54.7

30.3

64.5

48.2

37.8

42.9

44. 1

45.5

40.7

42.3

45.0

44.3

47.9

46.8

49.1
[late Co
End
(In)

5.0



I .0



1 .0



4.0



6.0

1.6

5.0

6.0

6.0

5-0

5.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

5.0

5-0

5.1
1 lect ion
Total
(In)

55.3



61.2



66.5



50.7



58.5

47.2

32.8

36.9

38.1

40.5

35.7

37.3

40.0

38.3

42.9

41.8

44. 1
Leaehate This Sheet

Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)

661 .9



732.6



796.0



606.9



700.2

564.9

392.6

441.7

456. 1

484.8

427.3

446.5

478.8

458.5

513-5

500.3

527.9
9191

6224
15415
0 1 s t r i but i on
Start
(In)

72.8

72.5

73-2

72.8

72.3

72.9

72.3

72.5

72.3

74.5

72.5

72.5

72.7

72.7

72.7

72.9

72.6

72.8

72.9

72.9

72.8
End
(In)


1 .0

1 .0

4.3

13.3

28.2

1 .0

1 .0

3.0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

2.0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

Total
(In)


71.8

71 .5

68.9

59.5

44. 1

71 .9

71 .3

69-5

71 .3

73.5

71.5

71.5

71.7

71.7

71.7

70.9

71.6

71-8

71.9

71.9

Shtrine-ei0"
01 stribut ion
Prior Shee t
Total Distr 1 but ion
Total
(Gal


859.4

855-9

824.7

712.2

527.9

860.6

B53-5

B3I.9

853.5

879. 8

855.9

855.9

H58.2

858.2

858.2

848. 7

B57.I

859.4

B60.6

860. 6

16632

45135
61767
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse

38249



39231



39972



40754



41739

42028

42515

42929

43329

43702

44133

44545

44915

45313

45659

46020

46352




   COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                   PLATE H-25 C
                                                                                     FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"

Date
1972

3-12

3-13

3-14

3-15

3-16
^eac
Start
(in)


46.6

45-3

49-6

51.4

61.7
hate Col lect i
End
(In)


5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.4
Total
(In)


41.6

41.3

44.6

46.4

55.3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
on
Total
(Gal)


497.9

494.4

533-9

555.4

661 .9
2743
15415
18158
Dl stribut ion
Start
(In)


72.9

72.9

73.0

73.0

1 .0
End
(In)

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

Total
(In)

71 .8

71.9

71.9

72.0

72.0

?h?JrSneuei°n
D i s t r i but i on
Prior Sheet
Tola 1 Di s t r i bu t i on
Total
(Gal

859.4

860.6

860.6

861 .8

861 . 8

4304
SI767
&607I
Fluid
Ret . In
Refuse


46714

47080

47407

47714

47913

                                                                                        COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                                                                        PLATE  H-25  D

-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"


Date

3-16-72

3-17-72

3-24-72

3-26-72

3-28-72

3-30-72

4-1-72

4-5-72

4-7-72

4-10-72

4-11-72

4-14-72

4-21-72

4-28-72

5^8-72

5-11-72

5-17-72

5-23-72

5-31-72

6-9-72
Leachate Collection

Meter
Read 1 ng
000

362

3822

5118

6293

7350

8475

11193

12556

14592

15391

17734

22072

27102

33540

35191

39010

42251

46622

52567
Leech* te This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet

Total Leachate
Total Cs Uons
Leachate
Generated

362

3460

1296

1175

1057

1125

2718

1363

2036

799

2343

4338

5030

6438

1651
-
3819

3241

4371

5945

52567
18158

70725
Distribution

Meter
Read i ng
000

1233

6771

8366

9881

11810

13412

16692

19264

21901

. 23438

26352

33368

40303

49330

51477

56302

60010

64931

71820
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons

Distributed

1233

5538

1595

1515

1929

1602

3280

2572

2637

1537

2914

70)6

6935

9027

2147

4825

3708

4921

6389

71820
66071

M78<»i
Fluid
.''.eta i ned
in
Refuse

48784

50862

51 161

51501

52373

52850

53412

54621

55222

55960

56531

59209

61 1 14

63703

64199

65205

65672

66222

67166





County of Sonoma
Plate  H-25 E
                                                                                                      FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"


Dale


6-16-72

6-23-72

6-29-72

7-3-72

7-10-72

7-18-72

7-25-72

8-1-72

8-9-72

8- 14-72

8-22-72

8-30-72

9-5-72

9-18-72

9-27-72

10-3-72

\0-\0-72

10-19-72

11-7-72

1 1-16-72
Leacha te Co 1 1 ec t i on

Meter
Read i ng

56238

59299

60956

63070

66970

71700

76070

80164

84360

87394

92050

94164

94164

101230

106400

1 10395

1 14430

122560

1 35080

140590
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate ""or Sheet
Totai Leachate
Total Cations
Leachate
Generated
3721

301 1

1657

2114

3900

4730

4370

4094

4196

3034

4656

2114

(3300)*

7066

51 70

3995

4035

8130

12520

5510

91323
70725
162048
Disr.r ibution

Meter
Read i ng

75667

78685

80052

83760

89020

95270

100766

106140

. 1 1 1880

1 1 5860

121623

126490

1 30740

1 40100

146490

151020

155790

161580

173450

178370
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons

Distributed
384?

3018

1 367

3708

5260

6250

5496

5374

5740

3980

5763

4867

4250

9360

6390

4530

4770

5790

1 1870

4920

106550
137891
244441
Fluid
.''.eta i ned
i n
Refuse
67292

67299

67009

67603

69963

71483

72609

73889

75433

7637"

77486

80233

81 189

R3483

84703

85238

85973

83633

82983

82393




* Collection line broke and leachate neneration data durino this
                                                                                                     County of Sonoma
                                                                                                                                        Plate  H-25  F

-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"

























ro
o>
ro























Date


11-27-72

12-6-72

12-1 1-72

12- 18-72

12-26-72

1-4-73

1-11-73

1-18-73

1-26-73

2-1-73

2-8-73

2-15-73

2-22-73

3-1-73

3-8-73

3-15-72

3-22-73

3-29-73

4-5-73

4-12-73
Leachate Collection

Meter
Read i ng

147780

153130

156050

157880

160990

166040

170620

175*10

180095

183170

186460

189450

192160

193790

195650

200460

204130

207690

210990

215170
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet

Total Leachate
Total Ca lions
Leachate
Generated
7190

5350

2920

1830

3110

5050

4580

4790

4685

3075

3290

2990

2710

1630

I860

4810

3670

3560

3300

4180

74580
162046

236628
Distribution

Neter
Reading

185920

191030

192770

192770

196410

202900

208500

212950

217930

220800

224740

227920

229680

231390

23'tl 10

240040

245020

250740

255940

261 ISO
Uisir ib'jlion
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons

Distributed
7550

51 10

17*0

0

3640

6490

5600

4450

4°PO

2870

3940

3180

1760

I7IC

2720

5930

49P-C

5720

5200

5210

82780
244441 .-.

327221
Fluid
Detained
in
Refuse
82753

82513

81333

79503

80033

81473

82493

82253

82548

82343

82993

83183

82233

82313

83173

84293

85603

87763

89663

90693





County of Sonoma
                                   Plate  H-25
                                                                                                      FLUID ROUTING  CELL "C"


Date


4-19-73

4-26-73

5-3-73

5-10-73

5-17-73

5-24-73

5-31-73

6-7-73

6-14-73

6-21-73

6-28-73

7-5-73

7-12-73

7-19-73

7-26-73

8-2-73

8-9-73

8-16-73

8-23-73
Leachate Collection

Meter
Read i ng

217370

220350

222580

224310

226740

227930

229130

23101)0

233340

236250

238220

240940

242760

245710

2482 10

250060

253610

2S633C

258540 .
Leachate This Sheet

Leachate Prior Sheet

Total Leachate
Total Ha lions
Leachate
Generated
2200

2980

2230

1730

21(30

1 190

1200

1910

2300

2910

1970

2720

1820

2950

2500

1850

3550

2720

2210

43370

236628

279998
Distribution

' Meter
Reading

261520

265760

269550

271710

277790

282060

283750

288650

292*100

297020

300000

304990

308060

313320

317320

322080

326660

3:0550

333^00
Distribution
This Sheet
Dis tr i but ion
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons

Distributed
370

4240

3790

2 160

6080

<(270

1690

4900

3750

lt620

2980

1(990

3070

5260

4000

4760

4580

3890

3350

72750

327221

399971
Fluid
detained
in
Refuse
88863

91123

91683

92 11 3

95763

9E843

99333

102323

103773

105483

106493

108763

110013

1 12323

113823

116733

1 17763

118933

120073





                                                                                                     County of Sonoma
Piste  H-25 H

-------
                         FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"


Date


8-30-73

9-6-73

9-14-73

9-21-73

9-JE-73

10-5-73

10-12-73

10-19-73

10-26-73

1 1-2-73

1 1-9-73

1 1-16-73

1 1-23-73

1 1-30-73

12-7-73

12-14-73

12-21-73

12-2R-73

I-4-74

1-11-7*
Leachate Collection

Meter
Read i ng

261900

265410

267950

269900

271610

273380

275320

277630

280820

283800

2fi°490

29«P20

305970

3091 to

31 t?00

3 159 SO

320500

32G4RO

332970

3381(70
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet

Total Leachate
Total Callorii
Loachate
Generated
3360

3510

2540

1950

1710

1 770

1940

2310

3190

2980

• ' Q ";

T330

7150

4T9°"

1, 2 4 0 *

4080

4520

5 9 3 o

6490

5500

8J230
27999?

363228
Distribution

Meter
Read i ng

339270

344365

346720

345760

351 160

353640

355970

360930

363540

369920

175270

3PT170

3^550

3T7TT

3°2(<,5'5

3D5PIO

39?rno

403871

407670

411060
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons

Distributed
5370

5095

2355

3040

1400

2480

2330

4960

2610

6380

5150

5710

55eO

3240

2 "61

3160

orinn

4070

3800

3390

77160
399971

477131
Fluid
.''.etained
in
Refuse
1 2 2 0 8 3

123668

1234?3

124573

121.263

124973

125363

12801 3

127433

1 30833

130493

12', °f. 3

1 2 r, 2 " 3

123543

I22K3

121243

120713

i rro?

1 161 13

1 14003





 An estimated amount of  leachatc  lost  due to  eouipnent  failure
was fiaured into  this total.
                         County  of  Sonoma                 Piste  H-25 I
                                                                                                                       FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"


Dale


1-18-74

1-30-711

2-8-74

2-15-714

2-22-74

3-4-74

3-8-74

3-15-74

3-22-74

3-29-74

4-3-74

14- 1 2- 74

4- 19- 7!)

4-26-7^

5-3-74

5-10-7'

5-20-7'

5-24-7'

5-31-7'

6-7-74
Leachate Col lection

Meter
Read i ng

344200

351220

355190

357710

36031*0

3&l4l 10

365470

368370

371230

374230

377290

380610

383510

3861*10

3888UO

391070

393370

394500

39661*0

398590
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet

Total Leachate
Total Rations
Leachate
Generated
5730

7020

3970

2520

2630

3770

1 360

2900

2860

3000

3060

3320

2900

2900

2430

2230

2300

1 1 30

211*0

1950

60120
363228

423348
Distribution

Meter
Read'ng

414610

419800

422540

425420

<*27I *0

428700

<*29270

433300

436090

438530

440020

443830

446830

449630

451 740

455090

457950

460060

462930

466360
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons

Distributed
3550

5190

2740

2880

1 720

1560

570

4030

2790

2440

1 490

3810

3000

2800

2110

3350

2860

2110

2870

3430

55300
477131

532431
Fluid
detained
in
Refuse
1 1 1623

109993

108763

109123

1082 1 3

106003

10521 3

106343

106273

105713

i 041 1*3

104&33

104733

104633

10431 3

105433

105993

106973

1C 770 2

i 09 183





County of Sonoma
                                Plate  H-25 J

-------
                               FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
6-14-74
6-21-74
6-27-74
7-5-7*1
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
400610
402370
404620
406870
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gallons
Leachate
Generated
2020
1760
2250 "
2250
8280
423348
431628
Distribution
Meter
Reading
469520
473230
477770
482320
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
3160
3710
4540
4550
15960
532431
548391
Fluid
.".etained
in
Refuse
110323
112273
114563
1 16863


ro
                               County of Sonoma
Plate  H-25 K

-------
                      FLUID ROUTING CELL"0"

Date

*
1971
12OO

12-31

~^3

I-*

1-5

1-7

1-10

l-ll

1-12

1-13

1-1*

1-15

1-17

1-18

1-19

1-20

1-21

1-2*

1-25

1-26
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)

70.0

5.6

27. S

27.6

27.9

28.5

28.8

30.0

31.8

46.0

48.8

58.8

26.2

3*.*

*9.7

73.4

23.*

69.9

12.3

17.*
End
(In)























1.3







1.0

1.0

1 .0

1.0

1.0
Total
(In)























56.5







72.*

22.*

68.9

11.3

16.*
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
.(Gal)
1500*






















679.7







866.6

268.1

82*. 7

135.3

196.3
*»7I
0
**7I
Distribution
Start
(In)

56.6

70.6

73-8

73.3

72.2

73.3

72.5

- 72.0

72.0

72.0

71.0

56.*

71 .5

71.1

71.2

71.2

76.2

69.*

62.3

70.9
Th?Jrs
End
(In)


0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.0

1 .0

1 .0

9.3

Total
(In)


56.6

70.6

73.8

73.3

72.2

73.3

72.5

72.0

72.0

72.0

71.0

56.*

71.5

71.1

71-2

70.7

75.2

68.*

53.0

button
heet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal)
80630

682.2

851 .8

889.5

883.5

871.*

883.5

87*.*

868.*

868.*

868.*

856.3

679.9

867.2

857.3

858.7

852.6

906.9

82*. 9

639.2

239*8
0
239*8
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
6563






















15281







17678

18262

183**

1903*

19*77



•8,063 gallons  of rain water added during refuse placement.
 1,500 gallons  of leachate generated during refuse placement.
                         COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                        PLATE H-26 A
                                                                                                            FLUID  ROUTING  CELL"D'

Date

1972

1-27

1-28

1-31

2-1

2-2

2-3

2-*

2-7

2-8

2-9

2-10

2-1 1

2-12

2-13

2-1*

2-15

2-16

2-17

2-18

2-19
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)


27.3

33.*

81.5

16.5

22. l>

*2.8

1(2.0

81.*

16.5

20.6

*l .6

*7.6

48.2

*7.5

31.8

*0.6

39.2

*2.6

*2.6

*3.3
End
(In)


1 .0

1 .0

2.0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

2.0

1 .0

1 .0

2.0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .5

1 .0

1 .0
Total
(In)


26.3

32.*

79.5

15.5

21 .*

*1 .8

*l .0

79.*

15.5

19.6

39.6

46.6

*7.2

*6.5

30.8

. 39.6

38.2

*l . 1

*) .6

*2.3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)


31*. 8

387.8

951 .6

185.5

256.2

500.3

*90.7

950.*

185-5

23*. 6

47*. 0

557.8

56*. 9

556.6

368.7

*7*.0

*57.3

492.0

497.9

506.3
1*07
4*71
13878
D 1st ri but Ion
Start
(In)


72.5

70.7

72.5

70.5

71.6

*5.1

43.1

72.3

71.*

72.9

72.8

70.2

65-3

62.*

73-0

73. 1

72. 1

71 .1

71 .2

72.6
Olstr 1
This S
End
(In)

0.0

10.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

12.3

2.0

I 1 .0

14.8

15.3

13-5

22.0

19.3

23.3

19.7

21.1

19.0

Total
(In)

70.9

61 .6

70.7

72.5

70.5

71.6

45.1

*3.1

60.0

69-*

61.9

58.0

5*. 9

51.8

40.4

53.7

49-8

52.*

50.0

52.2

but i on
heet
Dlst r Ibut Ion
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal)

855-1

7*2.9

852.6

875.0

850.9

86*. 1

5*4.3

520.2

724.1

837.6

7*7. 1

700.0

662.6

625-2

487.6

648. 1

601 .0

632.4

603.5

630.0

1400*
239*8
37952
Fluid
Re t . In
Refuse


20017

20372

20273

20963

21557

21921

21975

215*5

22083

22686

22959

23102

23199

23268

23387

23561

23705

238*5

23951

2*07*


                                                                                                              COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26

-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL"0"

Date

1972

2-20

2-21

2-22

2-23

2-2*

2-25

2-26

2-27

2-28

2-29

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

3-7

3-8

3-9

3-10

Leachate Collection
Start
(In)


41.3

37-5

33.7

37.8

52.4

46.7

58.9

50.9

55.3

62.3

60.5

60.8

60.8

66.5

59.9

61 .0

64.5

60.7

59.7

60.7

End
(In)


1.0

1 .0

1.0

2.0

11.8

2.0

1.0

1 .0

2.0

'•0

2.0

2.0

3-0

2.0

2.0

2.0

1 .0

2.0

3-0

2.0

Total
(In)


40.3

36.5

32.7

35.8

40.6

44.7

57.9

49.9

53.3

61.3

58.5

58.8

57.8

64.5

57.9

59.0

63-5

58.7

56.7

58.7

Leachate This Sheet
Leechote Prlqr Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)


482.4

436.9

391.4

428.5

485.9

535.1

693.1

597.3

638.0

733.8

700.2

703.8

691.9

772.1

690.7

706.2

760. 1

702.6

678.7

702.6

12531
13878
26409
Distribution
Start
(In)


72.5

72.9

72.3

81 .0

72.7

72.3

72.3

72.5

72.3

72. 1

72.8

72.6

72.8

72.9

72.9

72.9

73.0

72.9

72.8

73.0

T-h?strS
End
(In)

21.4

23.4

28.2

31.6

1.0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1 .0

0.0

1.0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1 .0

1.0
Total
(In)

51.2

49. 1

44.7

40.7

80.0

71-7

71.3

71-3

71.5

71 .3

71.1

71.8

71.6

72.8

71 .9

71.9

71.9

72.0

71.9

71.8

72.0
>u 1 1 on
heet
Distribution
Prior Sheot
Total Di st r i but Ion
Total
(Gal)

617.9

592.6

539.5

491 .2

965.5

865.3

860.5

860.5

862.9

860.5

858.1

866.5

864. 1

878.6

867.8

867.8

867.8

868.9

867.8

866.5

868.9
17059
37552
55011
Fluid
Ret . In
Refuse


24210

24365

24514

2*576

25056

25386

25553

25817

26042

26168

26326

26489

26661

26768

26945

27106

27214

27380

27569

27733




   COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                   PLATE  H-26
                                                                                      FLUID  ROUTING  CELL"D'

Data
1972
3-11
3-12
3-13
3-14
3-15
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
58.1.
55.0
54.8
61.1
59.6
Leach
pump i
End
'(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
>te ad
ig ope
Total
(In)
57. 4
511.0
53.8
60. 1
58.6
us t men
a t i on
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
687. 1
61)6. it
643.9
719. 4
701 .4
for
506.5
4905
261)09
31314
Di s t ribut ion
Start
(In)
73.0
72.9
73.0
72.9
73.0
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .1
1 .0
i .0
Total
(In)
72.0
71.9
72 .0
71.9
72.0
?i S t r i but i on
his Sheet
DI s t r 1 but i on
Prior Sheet
Total Di s t r i but i on
Total
(Gal)
868.9
867.8
868.9
867. R
868.9
4343
5501 1
59354
Fluid
.Ret. In
Refuse
27915
2P138
28361
2851 1
28t77
28040

                                                                                         COUNTY  OF  SONOMA
                                                                                                                        PLATE  H-26 0

-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "0"

Date


3-15-72
3-16-72

3-17-72

3-24-72

3-26-72

3-28-72

3-30-72

it-1-72

4-5-72

4-7-72

4-10-72

4-11-72

4-14-72

4-21-72

4-28-72

5-8-72

5-11-72

5-17-72

5-23-72
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng

1
000
889

1673

6917

8390

9921

11643

13352

17395

19574

22051

23133

26420

33072

42378

52260

54547

59062

63282
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Loachete
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
889

673

5117

1290

1301

1403

1392

3765

1774

2264

833

3120

6652

8928

9882

2287

4302

3882

59754
31314
91068
Distribution (Leachate 6 Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Read I ng

3
000
1000

1800

7100

8620

10240

11960

13630

17800

19787

22300

23300

26420

33450

42378

52260

54760

59400

63800
Gallons
Added
(3-D
4
1 1 1

127

183

230

319

317

278

405

213

249

167

0

378

0

0

213

338

518

Distribution
This Sh«at
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4+2)
5
1000

800

5300

1520

1620

1720

1670

4170

1987

2513

1000

3120

7030

8928

9882

2500

4640

4400

63800
59354
123154
Fluid
P.eta i ned
in
Refuse
(4+6)
6
28151

28278

28461

28691

29010

29327

29605

30010

30223

30472

30639

30639

31017

31017

31017

31230

31568

32086




   COUNTY  OF  SONOMA
                                        PLATE H-26  E
                                                                                                     FLUID ROUTING CELL "0"


Date



5-31-72

6-9-72

6-1 6-72

6-23-72

6-29-72

7-3-72

7-10-72

7-18-72

7-25-72

8- 1-72

8-9-72

8-14-72

8-22-72

8-30-72

9-5-72

9-18-72

9-27-72

10-3-72

Leachate Collection
MAt«r
neier
Read i ng

1

69953'

78027

83347

8?513

95122

99470

101(570

112217

1 191(20

125680

132053

136268

143744

150919

156li75

165567

172050

I76ll|li

Leachate
This Sheet
Leachatc
Prior Sheet
Total leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
6153

7577

4947

5596

5054

3840

1.950

7467

6700

6060

6103

1)068

7144

7019

5025

8797

52*3

3404

'•756
109903

91068
200971
Distribution (Leachate t Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Readl ng

3

70450

781.00

83917

90068

9563"

99620

10
-------
                        FLUID ROUTING CELL ''0"

Date


10-10-72

10-19-72

11-7-72

11-16-72

11-27-72

12-6-72

12-1 1-72

12-18-72

12-26-72

1-4-73

1-11-73

1-18-73

1-26-73

2-1-73

2-8-73

2-15-73

2-22-73

3-1-73

3-8-73
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng

1
181961

193070

209710

227890

2*9750

262910

268450

274020

293550

314290

329580

357350

392160

418640

450770

484430

518560

551560

584850
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2

9070

16640

15340

21860

13160

7940*

5570 .

19530

20740

15290

27770

34810

26480

32130

33660

34130

33000

33290

400410

200971
601381
Distribution (Leachate & Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Reading

3
184000

193070

212550

227890

249750

262910

268450

274020

293550

314290

329580

357350

392160

418640

450770

484430

518560

551560

584850
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
4

0

2840

0

0

0

-2400*

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Distribution
This Sheet
DIstributicn
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4*2)
5

9070

19480

15340

21860

13160
•
5540

5570

19530

20740

15290

27770

34810

26480

32130

33660

34130

33000

33290

400850

243354
644204
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
(4+6)
6

42383

45223

45223

45223

45223

42823

42B23

42823

42823

42823

42823

42823

42823

42823

42823

42823

42823

42823




* 2,400  gallons leachate lost on  Dec.  9, 1972,  due to frozer
  leachate  return  line.
                           COUNTY OF SONOMA                   PLATE  H-26G
                                                                                                                   FLUID ROUTING CELL "P-'


Date



3-15-73

3-22-73

3-29-73

4-5-73

4-12-73

4-19-73

4-26-73

5-3-73

5-10-73

5-17-73

5-2li-73

5-31-73

6-7-73

6-14-73

6-21-73

6-28-73

7-5-73

7-12-73

Leachate Col lection
Mftftr
mvf
Reading

1

6 151)20

61)1600

664300

684020

697580

706120

712727

718603

724792.

729941

734398

740773

747340

755397

762386

768552

774599

781260

leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
30570

26180

23300

19120

13560

8540

£607

5643

5882

4991

4028

6193

6000

7257

6571

5402

5949

5300

3«93
19493

601381
796364
Distribution (Leachate I Fresh Water)
Fresh Wate' Added
Meter
Read i ny

3

615420

641600

664900

6R4020

697580

706120

712960

718910

724950

730370

7345PO

741 140

748140

755RI5

7C3150

76Rf 50

775960

781890

Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
 18

764

1R

1361

630

1*90
Uistr ibut ion
This Sheet
Dlstr i'but >cn
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution

Total
Distribution
(4*2)
5
30570

26180

26 180

19120

13560

8540

6P40

5950

6040

5420

42 10

6760

6800

7675

7335

5500

7310

5930

43PO
201420

644204
845624
Flu'd
Retained
i n
Refuse
(t+6)
6
42823

42B23

42P23

42823

42823

42423

42656

42963

431 2 1

43550

43732

4429?
j
4509°

455 1 7

16281

46379

47740

48370

43860




400 qallons  leachate  lost  due to equipment failure.


                       COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                         HLATl H-26 H

-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "D"

Date


7-19-73

7-26-73

8-2-73

8-9-73

8-16-73

8-23-73

8-30-73

9-6-73

9-l*-73

9-21-73

9-28-73

10-5-73

10-12-73

10-19-73

10-26-73

1 1-2-73

1 1-9-73

11-16-73

1 1-23-73
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng

1
785780

790909

7969*0

805382

812777

819099

826090

832967

838238

81(11506

851070

857130

8631100

869979

8795*0

886*53

893870

90*270

913920
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2

*639

5120

7512

6237

61*9

6810

6337

5008

6186

6000

6060

6110

6579

8*60

62*3

7060

101 10

9650

120270

79636*
91663*
Distribution (Leachate S Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Read i ng

3
786270

791820

797870

8065*0

8)2950

819280

826630

833230

838320

8*5070

851070

857290

863*00

871080

880210

886810

89*160

90*270

913920
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
it

911

930

1 158

173

181

5*0

263

82

56*

0

160

0

1101

670

357

290

0

0

Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(*+2)
5

5550

6050

8670

6*10

6330

7350

6600

5090

6750

6000

6220

6110

7680

9130

6600

7350

101 10

9650

127650

8*562*
97327*
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
(*+6)
6

*977I

50701

51859

52032 '

52213

52753

53016

53098

53662

53662

53822

53822

5*923

55593

55950

562*0

562*0

562*0





   COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                      PLATE H-26
                                                                                                 FLUID ROUTING CELL "D"

Date



1 1-30-73

12-7-73

12-l*-73

12-21-73

12-28-73

l-*-7*

1-11-7*

1-18-7*

1-30-7'

2-8-7*

2-15-7'

2-22-7*

3-*-7*

3-8-7*

3-15-7*

3-22-71

3-29-7*

*-3-7*
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng

1

92 121)0

928230

933&'-0

939680

9*71*0

956290

966390

97*500

992220

997920

1006203

1018220

103831(0

101)8100

106*390

1078860

1096810

1 1 15710
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3
2
7320

6990

5610

5?*0

7HO

9150

10100

8110

17720

7700*

8283

10680

20120

9760

16290

1**70

17950

18900

202*53

91 663*
1 1 19087
Distribution (Leachate & Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Read i ng

3

9212*0

92R230

933«*0

9396TO

9*71*0

956290

966390

97*500

992220

997920

10075*0

101 8220

10383*0

10*8100

106*390

1078860

1096810

1 1 15710
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
I)
0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-2000*

1 337

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(**2)
5
7320

6990

5610

58*n

7'i60

9150

10100

81 10

17720

5700

9620.

10680

20120

9760

16290

l**70

17950

1 8900

201 790

97327*
1 1 7506*
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
;*+«)
6
5C24Q

562*0

5C240

562*0

£62*0

562
-------
                                                                                                                                  FLUID ROUTING CELL "0"
f\i
•vl
O

Date


1-12-71

1-19-71

1-26-71

5-3-71

5-10-71

5-20-71

5-21.-71

5-31-71

6-7-71

6-11-71

6-20-71

6-27-71

7-5-71
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng
1

1 117120

I 169010

II95260

1223600

1231920

1211280

1219075

1256905

"-1267098
.- .
1280678

1293389

1308310

1 313910
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-31
2
11710

21620

26220

28310

I 1320

9360

1795

7505

9028

12328

II 689

11200

5630

203715
1 1 19087
1 322832
Distribution (Leachate 4 Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Reading
3

1 117120

I 169010

1195260

1223600

1231920

1211280

1219100

1258070

1268350

1281700

12911 10

1308310

1313910
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
1
0

0

0

0

0

0

325

1 165

1252

1022

721

0

0

Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(1*2)
5
11 710

21620

26220

28310

1 1 320

9360

5120

8670

10280

13350

12110

11200

5630

208230
1 1 75061
1383291
Fluid
P.etalned
in
Refuse
(1+6)
6
55577

55577

55577

55577

55577

55577

55902

57067

58319

59311

60062

60062

60062


                                                                                                                                     COUNTY OF SONOMA
                                                                                                                                                                           PLATE  H-26 K

-------
            APPENDIX I
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY

-------
                     TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
                                   CELL A
  DATE
                       EVENT
ADDED LIQUII
RAINFALL
IV 5/71
11/12/71
11/13/71
11/15/71
11/15/71
11/16/71
11/17/71
11/22/71
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (530.35 Tons)
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain
Cell Cover 1n Place
Shot Initial Settlement Elevation
             0.29"
             0.25"
             0.02"
          Compacted Refuse
          Density 1064
                                        272
                                                            PLATE I- 1

-------
                     TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
                                   CELL B
  DATE
                           EVENT
ADDED LI QUID
RAINFALL
11/16/71
11/19/71
11/24/71
11/29/71
12/ 1/71
12/ 2/71
12/ 3/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 7/71

12/ 8/71
12/ 9/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
Started Placing Refuse
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell E
Resumed Refuse Placement
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (524.23 Tons)
Rain
Rain
Rain
Add Water from Water Truck
Add Water from Water Truck (69.25" 1n tank D as run
                            off from Cell B.
                            69.25" = 829 gallons)
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain
Rain
Cell Cover 1n Place
          Compacted Refuse  ,
          Density  1052 #/ydJ
               0.96"

               0.50"
               0.32"
               0.24"
20,000 gal.
14,000 gal?
              0.27"
              0.09"
          *14,000 gallons should be reduced by 829 gallons to
           determine total  moisture added to cell
                                                                      PLATE I- 2
                                         273

-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY




              CELL C
DATE
12/ 1/71
12/ 2/71
12/ 3/71
12/ 3/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 7/71
12/ 9/71
12/10/71
12/11/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/15/71
12/17/71
12/21/71
12/21/71
12/21/71
!
1
C
1
i

EVENT
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell E
Rain
Resumed Placing Refuse
Add Water from Water Truck (2,000 gal ran through
the cell and out the
tank)
Rain
Rain
Rain
Rain
Add Water from Water Truck
Finished Placing Refuse (521.72 tons)
Began Placing Muck Sand
Rain
Started Placing Distribution System
Started Placing Cell Cover
Cell Cover 1n Place
405 gal. Leachate pumped from bottom tank and
discarded

Compacted Refuse ,
Density 1064 #/ydJ
*4,000 gallons should be reduced by 2,000 gallons
to determine total moisture added to cell.
WED LIQUID






4.000*




4,000 gal.






- 405 gal .



RAINFALL

0.50"
0.32"

0.24"


0.27"
0.09"
0.03"
0.77"



0.05"







                                                 PLATE  I-  3

-------
                     TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
                                   CELL D
  DATE
                      EVENT
ADDED LIQUII
RAINFALL
12/13/71
12/15/71
12/22/71
12/23/71
12/23/71
12/24/71
12/27/71

12/28/71
12/29/71
12/29/71
12/29/71
12/30/71
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (530.97 Tons)
Rain
Rain - Leachate Collection Tank at bottom of Cell D
       was full and overflowing.  Leachate held for
       recycling.  Estimated volume, 1,500 gal.
Pea Gravel Placed for Distribution System
Rain
Distribution System Installed
Started Placing Cell Cover
Cell Cover 1n Place
          Compacted Refuse  ,
          Density  1065 #/ydJ
 - 1,500
  0.05"
  0.51"
  0.22"

  0.06"
  1.77"
              0.03"
                                        275
                                                                     PLATE  I- l»

-------
TES'fBeELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
              CELL E
DATE
11/15/7*
11/16/71
11/16/71
11/16/71

11/17/71
11/18/71
11/19/71
11/22/71
11/22/71
11/23/71
11/24/71
11/29/71
11/30/71
12/1/71
12/2/71
12/2/71
12/3/71
12/3/71
12/3/71
12/6/71
12/6/71
12/6/71
12/7/71
12/8/71
12/9/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
12/11/71
12/11/71
12/12/71

EVENT
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Septic Pumplngs
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell B(@Ton
180.2
Septic Pumpings
Sept I c Pump 1 ngs
Septic Pumptngs
Resumed Refuse Placement
Septic Pumplngs
Septic Pumpings
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell 8(8 Ton
Rain
Septic Pumpings
Septic Pumpings
Septic Pumpings
Rain
Rain
Resumed Refuse Placement
Sept 1 c Pump i ngs
Rain
Septic Pumpings
Finished Placing Refuse (521.93 Tons)
Septic Pumplngs
Septic Pumpings
Rain
Rain
Septic Pumplngs
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain '
Septic Pumpings
Cel 1 Cover In Place:
Refuse Density 1047 I/yd3
\DDED LIQUID


1,000 gal

)
1,000 Gal
800 Gal
2,200 Gal

2,200 Gal
1 ,000 Gal


2,200 Gal
2,600 gal
1,000 gal



1 ,000 gal

2,000 gal

3,800 gal
2,100 gal


3,300 gal


1 ,000 gal


RAINFALL

0.02"










0.96"



0.50"
0.32"


0.24"




0.27"
0.09"


0.03"



             276
PLATE I- 5

-------