PB-239 778
SONOMA COUNTY SOLID WASTE STABILIZA
TION STUDY
EMCON Associates
Prepared for:
Environmental Protection Agency
1975
DISTRIBUTED BY:
KTDl
National Technical Information Service
U. S. DEPARTMENT 05 COMMERCE
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
SHEET
1. Reort No.
530SW65D1
PB 239 778
4. Title and Subtitle
Sonoma County Solid Waste Stabilization Study
5. Report Date
1975
6.
7. Author(s)
EMCON Associates
8. Performing Organization Rept.
No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
EMCON Associates
326 Commercial Street
San ijose, California
10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
11. Contract/Grant No.
G06-EC-00351
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
Washington, D. C. 20460
13. Type ofNReport & Period
Covered
Final '
14.
15. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstracts
This report documents all three years of a three-year demonstration
project sponsored by EPA and Sonoma County, California. ,The purpose
of the project was twofold: (1) to investigate the stabilization
of solid waste in a sanitary landfill by analyzing leachate, gas,
temperature and settlement parameters, and (2) to determine the
effect on solid waste stablization of applying, under various opera-
tional modes, excess water, septic tank pumpings, and recycled
leachate 1n a sanitary landfill. This report describes the invest^
gation of the test site, construction, instrumentation, and site
operations and discusses the data produced with some conclusions
based on extensive monitoring. Tables and figures following this
report summarize the detailed data presented in the appendices.
17. Key Words and Document Analysis. 17o. Descriptors
Landfill, Leachate, Septic Tank, Water
17b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms
Test Cell, Solid Waste
P&CES SUWECT TO CHAMGE
NATIONAL TECHNICAL
INFOw!^N.SHSYICE
17c. COSATI Field/Group
18. Availability Statement
->RM NTis-35 (REV. 10-73) ENDORSED BY ANSI AND UNESCO.
19.. Security Class (This 121. No. of Pages
Report) I y^L^L
UNCLASSIFIED I- A-°->
20. Security ( ^EPALBIWffiOT 10MATERIW-S
"
THIS FORM MAY BE R^
RXDOQDlbSbl
-------
NOTICE
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM THE
BEST COPY FURNISHED US BY THE SPONSORING
AGENCY. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CER-
TAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RE-
LEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE
AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE.
-------
0 6527S
SONOMA COUNTY SOLID WASTE STABILIZATION STUDY
This final report (SW-65d.l) describes work performed
for the Federal solid waste management programs under
demonstration grant project G06-EC-00351 to Sonoma County^ California
was written by EMCON ASSOCIATES
and, is reproduced as received from the grantee
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1975
-------
This report as submitted by the grantee or contractor has not been
technically reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Publication does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of EPA, nor does mention of commercial products
constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government.
An environmental protection publication (SW-65d,l) in the solid waste
management series.
n
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
II..
III.
IV.
V.
"VI .
-VII.
VI I I
IX.
TABLES
FlCURES
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
INSTRUMENTATION
REFUSE COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS
OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT
MONITORING PROGRAM
DISCUSSION
REFUSE STABILIZATION AND LEACHATE COMPOSITION
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
TEST CELLS: TREATMENT, PURPOSE AND RESULTS
GROUNDWATER QUALITY
GENERAL SUMMARY OF REFUSE STABILIZATION
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY
REFERENCES
v
1
3
7
13
\k
17
19
22
22
28
50
51
56
57
1.
2.
3.
k.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1 1 .
12,
13.
H».
15.
1 .
2,
3.
A.
5.
6.
7.
Rat Ios
Rat i os
Liquid Conditioning and Purpose of Cells
Summary of Typical Ranges of Various Leachate Components
Refuse Moisture Content Summary
Refuse Composition Summary
Composition of Refuse
Cell C Leachate - EIectro-ConductivIty/Paramotfir
Cell D Leachate - Electro-Conductivity/Parameter
Companion Thermistor Comparison
Leachate Laboratory Studies
Leachate Field Studies
Solution Analysis
Weight, Density, Moisture
Trace Metal Concentration
Trace Meta1 Concentrat I on
Trace Metal Concentration
Data of Test
in Leachate,
in Leachate,
in Leachate,
Cell Refuse
CelIs A,B,E
Cel 1 C
Cel 1 D
Location Map
Geolog i c Map
Exploration Map
Field Density Test Location
Site Plan (as bui1t)
Section A-A, Site Plan
Sect!on B-B, S i te PI an
Map
-------
FIGURES (cont'd)
8.
9.
10.
1 1 .
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
2k.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39,
40.
41.
C lay Ba
Typ i cal
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Plot of
Col 1e
F uid R
Fluid R
Plot of
Cel 1
P ot of
P ot of
P ot of
P ot of
P ot of
Plot of
Sett lem
APPENDICES
A.
B.
C.
. D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
A-E
- Cel
Cel Is
s A-E
A-E
Instrumentation Location Plan
Alkalinity vs. Time - Cells A-E
Volatile Acids vs. Time - Cells
B.O.D. vs. Time - Cel Is A-E
C.O.D. vs. Time - Cells A-E
Total Dissolved Solids vs. Time
Electro-Conductivity vs. Time -
Chloride vs. Time - Cells A-E
Sulphate vs. Time - Cells A-E
Phosphate vs. Time - Cells A-E
Nitrate vs. Time - Cells A-E
Nitrogen-Ammonia vs. Time - Cells A-E
Nitrogen-Organic vs. Time - Cells A-E
Sodium vs. Time - Cells A-E
Potassium vs. Time - Cells A-E
Calcium vs. Time - Cells A-E
Magnesium vs. Time - Cells A-E
pH vs. Time - Cells A-E
Iron vs. Time - Cells A-E
Fecal Coliform vs. Time - Cells A-E
Fecal Streptococci vs. Time - Cells A-E
Cumulative Leachate Production - Cells A,B,
Cumulative Water Distribution S Leachate
tion-Cell C
Rout ing - Cel 1 C
Routing - Cell D
Temperature vs
; A-E
Tempe rature
Temperature
Temperature
Tempe rature
Tempe rat u re
Gas Compos i t i on
-.nt - Cel 1 s A-E
Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing
Test Cell Construction Data
Clay Barrier Construction Data
Instrumentation Detail Drawings
Refuse Compositional Data
Monitoring Schedules
Analytical Methods and Procedures
Mon i tored Data
Test Cell Refuse Placement History
& E
Time - Middle Thermistor
vs .
vs .
vs .
vs .
vs .
i on
Ti
Ti
Ti
Ti
Ti
vs
me
me
me
me
me
,
- Al 1
- Al 1
- Al 1
- Al 1
- Al 1
Time -
The
The
The
The
The
Cel
rm
rm
rm
rm
rm
Is
s
s
s
s
s
A
to
to
to
to
to
-E
rs ,
rs ,
rs ,
rs ,
rs ,
Ce
Ce
Ce
Ce
Ce
1
1
1
1
1
A
B
E
C
D
IV
-------
PREFACE
Sanitary landfilling involves (l) the placement of refuse in
a manner which wMI not degrade -the 1and-water-atr environment of
the disposal site, (2) the compaction of the refuse to the smallest
practical volume, (3) the daily covering of the refuse wfth a
layer of earth and (4) the performance of disposal operations
without creating nuisances or hazards to the health and safety
of the surrounding community.
Once disposed of in a sanitary landfill, the refuse presents
a potential source of pollutfon for a period of 10's to 100's of
years. The introduction of large quantities of water into the
sanitary fill either by acts of nature such as floods and rising
groundwater or by negligence of man through inadequate grading,
drainage, or maintenance of the earth cover can release pollutants
from the decomposing refuse to contaminate the groundwater and
surface waters„
The study discussed in thi's report was conceived to test the
hypothesis that stab 11 iza't Ton of refuse in a sanitary landfill can
be accelerated by the controlled application of water thereby
reducing the period of time during which the landfill presents a
potential source of pollution and the risk that such pollution
might occur.
The stabilization of household refuse in a sanitary landfill
is being investigated in five large-scale field test cells. The
refuse in the test cells is subjected to various moisture conditions
and mediums through the controlled application of excess water,
septic tank pump ings and recycled leachate. The stabilization
of the refuse is measured by monitoring and analysis of leachate,
gas, temperature and settlement of the sanitary landfill. In
addition, the groundwater in the vicinity of the test cells is
tested periodically to detect any s i gn i f i can t change of quality,,
-------
This study is funded principally by the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency under Demonstration Grant No. G06-EC-00351 of the
EPA Office of Solid Waste Management Programs. Partial funding
of the 3 year demonstration project is provided by the County of
Sonoma, Project Sponsor.
P'ro'J'e'c't. Ma n ageraen t
Mr. Donald B. Head, Director of Public Works, County of
Sonoma is Project Director. All project activities are directly
supervised by the Assistant Director of Public Works for Sonoma
County, Mr. Duane Butler. Project Engineer assisting Mr. Butler
is Mr. Johnny Conaway.
Emcon Associates, Consultants in Waste Management, provides
technical direction and input to the project, as well as the
laboratory testing and analysis. Their services are under the
direction of Project Manager, Mr. John G. Pacey. Dr. James Leckie
of Stanford University provides bfological-cheraica1 consulting
expertise through Emcon Associates.
Ac know 1 'e'd'g'nie'n11 s
Among those who contributed significantly to the study were
the staff of the Environmental Protection Agency in Cincinnati,
Ohio; the State of California Department of Public Health; the
State of California Department of Water Resources; the County of
Sonoma Sanitation Department ; and students of Sonoma State College
and Santa Rosa Community College.
Vl
-------
I - INTRODUCTION
The investigation which forms the subject of this report was
authorized under a three-year demonstrat ton grant project sponsored
by EPA and the County of Sonoma, California. The purpose of the
project is twofold:
i. To investigate the stabilization of refuse in a sanitary
landfill by analyzing leachate, gas, temperature and
settlement parameters.
2. To determine the effect on refuse stabilization of applying,
under various operational modes, excess water, septic
tank pump ings and recycled leachate to a sanitary landfill.
The stabilization of refuse is monitored in five instrumented
field scale test cells. Each test cell is subjected to a
different controlled moisture condition and/or liquid character.
The liquid conditioning and purpose of each cell are set forth in
Table 1.
This report documents the site investigation, construction,
instrumentation and site operations and presents and discusses
data generated during the three-year demonstration grant project.
The work was conducted jointly by the staffs of Sonoma County
Department of Public Works and Emcon Associates, the County's
consultant, and includes the following:
1. Geotechnjcal investigation of test site.
2. Construction and instrumentation of clay barrier.
3. Design and construction of five field scale refuse test
cells and various monitoring instruments and facilities
for distribution, collection and storage of leachate and
water added to, or withdrawn from the test cells.
A. Compositional analysis of refuse placed in the test cells.
-------
5. Monitoring of refuse stabilization parameters, including
leachate and gas composition, temperature and settlement.
6. Monitoring of selected groundwater parameters to
determine the effect of the project on the quality of
the groundwater.
7. Development of leachate and gas sampling and analytical
p rocedures.
During the first six months of the study, the geotechnica1
investigation of the test cell area was accomplished, the test cells
were constructed, refuse placed, and the cells were covered. From
that time data has been collected on a scheduled basis concerning
refuse settlement, cell temperatures, gas composition and leachate
composition, as well as external parameters concerning groundwater
quality. Mean temperature, rainfall, evaporation, storm runoff
and quantity of liquid added to and withdrawn from each test cell
are also monitored.
Discussion presented tn this report follows the sequence in
which the activities occured, namely the first portions of the
report describe the geotechnical investigation and construction
activities followed by a discussion of instrumentation, composi-
tional analysis of the refuse, pertinent operations and manage-
ment procedures and th-e monitoring program. The main thrust of
this report is a discussion of refuse stabilization as measured
by extensive monitored data. Tables and figures following the
text of this report summarize the detailed data presented in the
appendi ces.
Readers wishing to examine closely the quantitative data will
find this information in the appendices following the main body
of this repo rt„
-------
II - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION - TEST CELL AREA
Scope of Work
The initial work element for the demonstration grant was a
geotechnical investigation of the test cell area located within
the Central Disposal Site Fn Sonoma County, California. The pur-
pose of the investigation was (1) to determine the material types
and conditions underlying the test cell area, (2) to determine the
suitability of the site for the proposed use, and (3) to prepare
appropriate recommendations concerning the geotechnical aspects
of the research program.
The scope of work completed in this investigation included
a surface and subsurface investigation, a review of geologic and
engineering data, laboratory testing of selected soil samples to
determine the pertinent physical and mechanical properties of
the foundation materials, and the evaluation of this data to
determine the suitability of the area for the intended program.
Site Desc r i pt ion
The Central Disposal Site is located.in the southwestern
portion of Sonoma County, approximately ^5 road miles north of
San Francisco, California. (See Figure 1) The site consists of
approximately *»00 acres of sparsely-wooded grazing land in the well
rounded foothills of the Northern Coast Range. It is located well
away from the path of urbanization, within a relatively short
travel distance of central service areas. An improved all-weather
road leads to the large central canyon. This canyon will provide
capacity for disposal of solid waste generate.d in Sonoma County
well beyond the year 2000.
An area for the test cells was selected about midway up the
central canyon in a relatively flat portion of the valley, just
east of the main drainage channel, (see Figure 2.) A small
-------
tributary drainage channel passes through the test cell area bi-
secting it approximately in half, with three cells located to the
north and two to the south of the tributary channel.
Placement of sanitary ffll at the Central Disposal Site
commenced in the main canyon just above (north) the test cell
area. Landfflling will proceed up the canyon away from the test
cells. The test cell area should therefore be available for
uninterrupted research activities for many years to come.
Geology
The Central Disposal Site is underlain primarily by marine
sediments of the Franciscan Formation, (see Geologic Hap, figure 2)
These Jura-cretaceous rocks consist of sandy clayey shale with
interbedded sandstones and silicic chert beds. Geologic structure
in the Franciscan Formation sediments is extremely complex re-
flecting a turbulent history of faulting, folding and shearing.
The trend of this bedrock system is generally northwest-southeast
through the Northern Coast Ranges of California.
The surface and near-surface deposits within the valley
portions of the site contain relatively thin deposits of poorly-
consolidated sediments of younger Herced Formation. The Merced
Formation rocks are of P1io-P1eistocene Age and consist essentially
of gravelly sandstones with Fnterbeds of sandy clay and silt.
The basal portion of the Herced Formation contains a zone of
we 11 -indurated impervious volcanic tuff breccia. Sediments of the
Merced Formation have been deposited on an old erosion surface
(valley) of the underlying older Franciscan Formation. The poorly-
consolidated sediments of the Merced Formation are relatively
undisturbed as indicated by their near-horizontal attitude and
uninterrupted continuity.
Subsurface Exploration
Five exploration trenches were excavated in the test cell
«rea in order to examine foundation soil types and conditions and
thereby determine the most suitable location for the cells from
the standpoint of geology.
-------
The locations of the trenches are shown on Figure 3 and the logs
of soils encountered tn the trenches are presented in Appendix A.
In general, the materials encountered in the excavation were com-
prised of sandy and s? 1 ty clays and clayey sands. Some gravel
was encountered in each trench and free water was observed in
trench k.
Groundwater
Sedimentary rocks of the Franciscan formation are considered
to be essentially barren of fresh water. Locally, however, these
we 1 I-consolidated rock units contain small supplies of poor to
fair quality water which Fs used for domestic and stock water
supply. The more successful low-yield wells tap water supplies
in deeply-weathered or highly-fractured rock. These marginal
supplies of poor quality water do not constitute a protectable
resource. Sediments of the Merced Formation contain groundwater
of moderate to high quality in the more pervious strata. This
water is contained in beds of sand, lenses of gravels and occasion-
ally in lenses of permeable volcanic rock.
Groundwater was encountered In thin beds of clayey sand and
gravel just above the basal tuff breccia In each of the drill
holes in the canyon bottom areas. This aquifer ranged in thickness
from two to ten feet and occurred from 15 to 25 feet below ground
surface. The groundwater encountered In this formation was
confined by overlying clays of low permeafa11Ity and artesian
pressure heads ranged from ten to nearly twenty feet in explora-
tion drill holes. Production capacities from wells in this thin
stratum are estimated to be marginal, but known hydraulic continuity
between this aquifer and major production aquifers to the south
established the absolute need to prevent pollution of this
aquifer by harmful materials originating in the refuse fill.
In addition to the subsurface groundwater, at least one per-
ennial and two intermittent springs exist in the large canyon
at the upper end of the Central Disposal Site. The backhoe investi-
gation in the test cell area revealed little groundwater within
twelve feet of the ground surface.
-------
Laboratory Investigation
Representative soil samples recovered from the exploration
trenches were tested In the laboratory to determine their physical
and mechanical characteristics. Test data are presented in
Appendix A. Based on the results of these laboratory tests, it
was concluded that the clay soils possess a permeability of less
than one foot per year and soils excavated for construction of
the test cells can be readily recompacted.
Cone 1 us i ons
Based on the results of the field and laboratory investiga-
tion, we determined that the test cell area was suitable for the
research test cells. It was decided that excavations for
construction of the test cells should terminate within the upper
sandy clay and clayey sand materials of low permeab?1 Ity. Applica-
tion of this criteria, tempered by drainage considerations and
evaluation of the cut-and-ftll material balance, resulted in the
siting of the test cells at the locations shown on the plans.
The native soils in thefr existing state were considered
generally satisfactory for retaining any leachate developed during
excavation of the test cells. Occasional lenses or layers of
more pervious waterbearing soils were expected in the cell
excavations. Such areas were to be over-excavated two feet and
an impervious clay lining was to be placed to restore the test
cells to design grade. Material generated from excavation of the
cells was considered suitable for construction of the embankment
portion of the test cells. The resulting test cells would thus be
relatively impervious and capable of retaining leachate and
gases„
-------
I II-PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Project constructton• generally proceeded as originally de-
signed and presented on the drawings which accompanied the demon-
stration grant application. However, some design modifications
were made during construction to meet changed conditions and re-
flect additional decisions. Final construction details are shown
on Figures 5, 6 and 7 "As Built" drawings.
CELL CONSTRUCTION
Excavat i on
The test cells were excavated to design grade and the material
/ • ' • ••'•''
removed was stockpiled adjacent to the cells.
Some groundwater was encountered in the excavation of Cells A
and E. As a consequence, the subsurface drains above Cell A and
E and above Cells B through D were installed prior to construction
of the embankment.
After excavation to design grade, the ground surface was
inspected to determine the presence of any pervious lenses within
the cell configuration. A thin zone of pervious material was
encountered in Cells A and E„ This material was removed by over-
excavating two feet. This area was then restored to design grade
with a two-foot-thick layer of compacted clay.
Embankment
The embankment areas of the test cells were first stripped of
all surface organic matter. The ground surface was then scarified
and compacted. The stockpiled material from cell excavation was
utilized as embankment fill and was placed in lifts of six inch
uncompacted thickness. The lifts were moisture conditioned as
necessary to achieve proper compaction and compacted by numerous
passes of a 5 x 5 sheepsfoot compactor drawn by a D-7 tractor and
a Buffalo Springfield steel wheeled compactor.
-------
Field density tests were taken during the placement operation
to determine the relatfve compaction of the embankment materials.
Results of the field densfty tests and laboratory control curves
are presented in Appendix B. Field density measurements were
made at the locations shown in figure 4.
When the downhill embankment had been constructed to a level
two feet above the floor of the cell, trenches for the leachate
collection lines were excavated in the bottom of the cell and a
trench was excavated through the embankment for the leachate line
discharging to the collection tank. Leachate collection lines
were placed in the trenches and backfilled. The trench through
the embankment was backfilled wfth a combination of native soil
and 10% bentonite, by weight, in order to assure an impervious
backfill. The embankments were then rafsed to design grade. ''A
shallow trench was excavated on the inside slope from the top
of the embankment to the base of the cell for installation of
the lysimeter and gas collection lines.
Leachate Collection System
After the cells were excavated and graded and the embankments
had been constructed to an elevation two feet above the base of
the cells, trenches were excavated in the base of the cells and
through the embankments for placement of the leachate collection
lines. Pea gravel was placed around the collection lines in Cell
C and D.
All collection tanks were positioned below the test cells
with the top of tank below the base of the test cells, thereby
assuring positive drainage of leachate into the collection facilities
In Cells A and E single leachate collection line was installed
across the lower (west) side of the base as only a small quantity
of leachate was expected. A full system of leachate collection
lines was installed in Cells B through D to collect the large
-------
quantities of leachate expected from these cells. Cell B was
expected to develop a considerable quantity of leachate only during
the initial charging to field capacity. Nevertheless, the quantity
expected was such that a full collection system was installed.
Granular Materials
Granular materials were used as backfill in the leachate
collection trenches and for d ts t r i but ton' material between the
distribution lines and refuse tn Cell C and D. Mechanical analyses
of potentially suitable materials were performed prior to cell
construction (See Appendix B). Concrete sand and muck sand from
Basalt were accepted for the silty sand and concrete sand require-
ments. Pea gravel was substituted for the proposed fine soil
backfill material on leachate collection lines in Cells C and
D and for material placed between refuse and distribution lines
in Cell D. This substitution was made to avoid the filtering
action that might occur when leachate passes through fine soil.
Refuse
Refuse was initially dumped at the edge of the cell and then
pushed into the cell and spread by a D-7 dozer. The dozer
compacted the refuse tn a manner similar to the procedures that
would be used in the normal sanitary landfill operation* Detailed
refuse placement history is presented in Appendix 1.
All incoming refuse was weighed. Samples of the refuse were
obtained for compositional analyses in accordance with accepted
statistical sampling methods. The samples were hand sorted into
appropriate waste categories in a covered work area within five
miles of the job site.
Cove r Mater i a 1
Cover material generally consisted of the stockpiled sandy
clay material from cell excavation. The cover material was placed
as a two-foot capping over the refuse in Cells A, B and E. A
-------
one-foot thickness of permeable material was placed between the
refuse and sandy clay cover in Cell C and D to facilitate distri-
bution of water and leachate. In Cell C this one-foot of material
consisted of a layer of fine si1ty sand placed directly overlying
the refuse. A six inch mound of concrete sand was placed around
the liquid distribution lines installed between the si1ty sand and
cover material. A 12-inch layer of pea gravel (In lieu of si1ty
sand) was placed between the refuse and cover material in Cell
D to minimize any filtration of leachate.
The sandy clay was spread in one-foot lifts and compacted
by numerous passes of a D-7 dozer. Two-tnch-diameter holes were
augered through the cell cover at intervals of 10 feet to permit
measurement of the in-place thickness of cover material. The
cover thickness measurements for all cells are presented in
Appendix B.
Leachate Distribution System
As previously mentioned, a twelve-Inch layer of pea gravel
was placed over the refuse in Cell D fn 1 feu of the originally
planned fine si1ty sand spreading medium. Elimination of the
spreading medium necessitated further changes in the distribution
system for Cell D to assure.unlform application of recycled leachate
over the refuse. The changes consisted of the installation of
two separate leachate distribution systems utilizing eight lines
each with lines more closely spaced than the originally planned
eleven line system. The decreased total footage in each system
made necessary an increase in the size of the small discharge
holes to maintain planned distribution rates. This had the side
benefit of reducing the potential for plugging of the holes by
solids in the leachate.
Clay Barrier Construction
An impervious clay barrier was constructed across t'he lower
end of the central canyon, below (south) of the test cells and
central disposal areas, to block the subsurface escape of leachate
and gases which might emanate from the sanitary landfill and
test cells. See Figure 8 for maximum cross section.
-------
Native sandy clay soils were excavated to bedrock in pre-
paration for construction of the barrier. Conditions encountered
in the excavation were as originally estimated with the maximum
depth of excavation being 30 to 35 feet below the valley floor
or approximately 20 to 25 feet below the canyon creek channel.
The excavation was inspected by Hr. Jack HcCollough, the Engineering
Geologist involved in the original investigation of the valley,
and Hr. John Pacey, Consulting Engineer for the construction
phase of the grant project.
A sump was excavated at the low point of excavation on the
downstream "side of the barrier excavation and backfilled with
granular material. A perforated pipe was installed in the sump
and extended to the natural ground surface to permit future removal
of seepage waters collected in the drainage blanket, if required.
The barrier was constructed by backfilling the excavation with
sandy clay soil obtained from the excavation. The fill material
was spread by a D-8 Caterpillar Tractor in relatively thin lifts
which were moisture conditioned as necessary to permit achievement
of the required relative compaction and compacted by numerous
passes of a 5 x 5 Sheepsfoot roller drum pulled by a TD-2*» tractor.
A sand drainage blanket was placed between the downstream face of
the clay barrier and natural ground.
A moisture-density curve was developed in our laboratory
to establish relative compaction parameters for the backfill
material in accordance with ASTH Test Designation D698-70. Field
density tests were performed periodically during the filling opera-
tion at random locations. Test methods utilized included both
the sand cone method (ASTH Test Designation D 1556) and the
nuclear density test method (ASTH Test Designation D2922-71).
The field density test results and laboratory compaction curve are
presented in Appendix C.
The barrier was constructed up to a point slightly above the
stream channel elevation under the inspection and testing control
of Hr. James Cleary of Emcon Associates. County personnel directed
and inspected the placement of additional fill required to raise
the grade up to the natural ground surface and to provide an
aesthetically-pleasing finish ground surface. No tests were
-------
performed on this final 10 feet of fill, as this work was princi
pally for aesthetic purposes. Nevertheless, precautions were
taken by County Staff to assure that the material was properly
moisture conditioned and compacted.
12
-------
IV - INSTRUMENTATION
Stabilization of the refuse is monitored by Instruments
installed in the test cells and by testing of leachate and gas
samples withdrawn from the cells at programmed Intervals.
Instrumentation installed for refuse stabilization data retrieval
include gas probes, thermistors, settlement monuments and
leachate collection facilities.
Evaporation, rainfall and cell runoff data necessary to
evaluate rainfall infiltration into the test cells, are recorded
respectively by an evaporIraeter, rain gauge and two flow meters.
Additional flow meters connected at appropriate locations in the
collection, discharge and distribution piping, record the daily
application of water to Cell C and makeup water applied to Cell
D, as well as the quantity of leachate produced by Cells C and D.
Instrumentation for obtaining groundwater samples and
measuring its quality include observation wells installed downhill
and uphill of the test cells and up-valley of the cla.y barrier,
and lysimeters installed below each test cell. Groundwater
levels within and beneath the clay barrier are monitored by
pi ezometers.
Instrument locations and identification symbols used in
recording data developed are shown on Figure 9. Detailed drawings
of the instruments utilized are presented In Appendix D.
13
-------
V - REFUSE COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS
tp
The composition and moisture content of refuse placed in
the test cells was determined by analyzing refuse samples selected
i
by statistical sampling methods. The sampling schedule was
derived by use of Random Sample numbers, as noted and shown on
P1 ate 1, Appendix E.
Sample . P rocureiaen-t Procedure
i
The weigh master marked the refuse trucks containing refuse to
be sampled as it left the scale. Trucks marked for sampling
were directed by the traffic dispatcher to deposit Its load of
refuse adjacent to the designated cell. A front loader scooped
300 or more pounds of refuse at random from this pile and loaded
it into the bed of a pickup truck. The sample was then enclosed In
a canvas tarp and transported to the sorting center which was
located about 5 miles east In the county road maintenance yard at
Cotati .
i
The sample was removed from the truck, placed on a thick
black plastic ground cloth and sorted. Forty-two part-time
employees, primarily students from Sonoma State College and Santa
Rosa Community College, were employed to sort the refuse samples.
Ten labelled 32-gallon trash cans with plastic liners were
positioned 'around the sample. Two to six students classified,
segregated and deposited the material in the trash cans.
Approximately 10 man-hours were required to sort a sample. The
material was sorted into the fol 1 ow ing"l|>' categor i eS :
I. Food Waste 6.,, Wood
2. Garden Waste "-" 7. .Metal?
3. Paper 8. Glass
k. Plastics, Rubber, Leather 9. Ash, Rock, Dirt
5. Text iles 10. Fines
11*
-------
After the sample was sorted, all cans in each category were
weighed and recorded. The total weight of waste in each category
is presented on plates 2-6, Appendix E.
Sort ing Gui deli nes
1. Synthetic material was classified as a plastic.
2. Fines were defined as any material that wpuld pass through
a 1" sieve. No further classification was attempted.
3. Wood was wood material that had been processed at a mill,
i.e., a 2xk was classified as wood, but a tree limb or
branch was classified as garden waste.
4. Food wastes included: bones, shells, feathers, and fecal
material. Food wastes were scraped out of their containers
and the container deposited into its appropriate category.
5. Labels were left on containers.
Moisture Determination
The samples of segregated refuse were bulky, took a long time
to dry and generated an obnoxious odor while drying. The small
capacity ovens of the Sonoma County Soils Lab were not adequate
to handle the large number of samples obtained, therefore
County staff designed and built two drying racks that could hold
sixteen 2 feet x k feet x 6 inch deep sheet metal trays. Thei
racks were enclosed with sheet metal and heated by a propane-fired
forced air heater. This system maintained a relatively constant
temperature of 105° F, drying most samples in from 2 to 6 days.
All samples were weighed before being placed in the drier.
The samples were subsequently checked and their weights recorded
every morning and evening. When two consecutive recorded weights
were equal, the sample was considered dry.
Data was obtained for two types of moisture samples:
1. Total Sample - A sample was extracted from the sorting
sample as it was loaded onto the pickup truck at the test
cells. This sample contained a representative amount of
all constituents and was not sorted.
15
-------
These samples were dried separately and the data is reported
on plates 7-11, appendix E in the four, left hand columns.
Compos i te Sarop'le - Samples of each of the ten constituents
from each sorted sample were obtained and sealed in plastic
bags. Four or more of these like category samples were
combined for this drying procedure. In combining the samples
only sequential samples were used and the constituent samples
of one cell were never mixed with those of another.
i
This data is reported on plates 7-11, appendix E in the ten,
right-hand columns. The samples from which the composite
sample was generated are listed under the appropriate
groupi ng.
16
-------
VI - OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT
AUTOMATIC OPERATIONS
Liquid Collection and Distribution System
Cell C and D distribution and collection systems are controlled
by a central timer that activates twice daily at pre-set intervals.
Four standard house service water meters measure the quantity of
liquids applied to and discharged from the cells- One meter measures
the fresh water inflow to the Cell C distribution system. One
meter is connected to the leachate collection tank discharge line
of Cell C and records the quantity of leachate pumped from the
collection tank and disposed of in the adjacent main landfill. A
meter Is installed in Cell D leachate return line and records the
leachate recycled through Cell D, The final meter is on the fresh
water system for Cell D and records the make-up water that is added
to maintain the desired quantity of liquid recycled through Cell D.
Cell A & E leachate is metered by a house service water meter
and discharged to the main landfill with an electric pump. Cell
B leachate is discharged to a collection tank and the quantity is
measured with a graduated bucket,, The leachate is disposed of
i n the ma i n 1 andfi1 I„
Storm Runoff Collection and Monitoring System
Storm runoff from Cell B and the combined runoff from Cells A
and E is collected in swales constructed in the cell embankments
and discharged through drainage inlets to collection tanks. The
collection tanks discharge through Sparling low pressure line meters
which record the runoff quantity,
MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT
The site is inspected daily by disposal operation's personnel
to check for any vandalism, theft or equipment malfunction. An
17
-------
office engineer visits the test cell site weekly for a detailed
check on all systems and to record the monitoring data. His
duties a re :
1) Record all meter readings.
2) Check, retrieve and replace charts on the recording
evapormeter and rain gauge.
3) Test the discharge rates for Cell C and D distribution
systems.
M Check and test automatic timing system,
5) Record meter readings on storm runoff metering devices.
MAINTENANCE
Although the Cell design and construction minimized the main-
tenance functions, three basic operational maintenance functions
rema in:
1) Since water service is not available at the site, water
is hauled by truck to a 6,000 gallon storage tank that
supplies the dafly water for Cell 'C1 distribution and
the makeup water for Cell D.
2) The distribution lines in Cells C £ D have to be cleaned
per i od i ca11y.
Cel1 C - The clear plastic tubing, connecting the discharge
mahiford pipe to the small diameter distribution pipe have
to be periodically cleaned of algae.
Cell D - The small diameter discharge holes in the distri-
bution piping clog due to fungus growth caused by the
leachate. These holes must be cleaned periodically.
3) The leachate generated from Cells A, B, C, E, and the
adjacent sanitary landfill is pumped into the sanitary
landfill. A 22-foot deep, 6-inch diameter grave 1-packed
well was drilled in the main landfill refuse and is presently
accepting all excess leachate from this project. This
construction is of a temporary nature and has to be
checked and serviced because of line breakage due to
landfill equipment operations.
18
-------
VI I - MONITORING PROGRAM
GENERAL
The monitoring program involves the collection of liquid
and gas samples for field and laboratory testing and retrieval of
data from instruments installed in and about the test cells and
clay barrier.
Monitoring activities are carried out jointly by the staffs
of Sonoma County Department of Public Works and Emcon Associates.
Rainfall, evaporation, storm runoff and refuse settlement, as well
as the metering of water and leachate flows into and out of Cells
C and D are monitored by Sonoma County Staff. The staff of
Emcon Associates collects and tests samples of leachate, gas, Cell
C.input water, and groundwater, and monitors lysimeters, thermisters,
and groundwater levels.
All monitored data is presented in Appendix H.
SAMPLING AND TESTING SCHEDULES
Sampling and testing of leachate and groundwater commenced
in December 1971. In February 1972, a formal schedule for
frequency of leachate, gas and groundwater sampling and analysis
was adopted.
The initial and revised sampling and testing schedules are
presented in Appendix F.
SAMPLE COLLECTION
Leachate, Groundwater, and Water Added to Cell C and D
Leachate samples are obtained at sampling valves located in
the collection line just upstream from the leachate collection
tank. The collection line discharges into the collection tank
-------
through a riser which extends above the elevation of the sampling
valve. This arrangement minimizes the exposure of the leachate to
the atmosphere.
The groundwater is sampled and tested to detect any contamina-
tion by leachate escaping from the cells. Groundwater samples
are bailed or pumped from the observation wells and periodically
collected from the Cell A and E subdrain outfall. Samples of
water added to Cell C are obtained directly from the water distri-
bution tank. The exposure of the groundwater samples to air during
the bailing and collection process, although not desirable, is not
considered detrimental to detection of contamination by leachate.
All samples of leachate and water are field tested for pH,
dissolved oxygen, electro-conductivity and temperature. These
tests require approximately 100 to 200 ml. samples. Samples scheduled
for laboratory testing of parameters that deteriorate rapidly with
time are treated with a compatible preservative. Samples are
stored on ice from the time they are collected until they are
delivered to the laboratory. Upon arrival at the laboratory the
samples are refrigerated until tested. Sampling and test procedures
are discussed in detail in Appendix G.
Gas
Gas samples are collected from the cell gas probes in gas
sample tubes. Sampling procedures and the gas analysis test method
are presented in Appendix G.
Lys imeters
Lysimeters are sampled periodically by injecting compressed
air through one of two ]/k Inch tubings connected to the lysimeter.
The fluid sample is discharged from the second \/k inch tubing
«nd collected for testing. Fluid collected is field tested for
pH, dissolved oxygen and, when sufficient quantity is available,
electro-conduct!vi ty.
20
-------
Fluid Distribution and Leachate Production
Flow meters, installed at appropriate locations in the
distribution and collection piping of Cells C and D, are read
periodically to determine the quantity of fluid entering and
1eavi ng the ce11s.
21
-------
VI I I - DISCUSSION
REFUSE STABILIZATION AND LEACHATE COMPOSITION
General Considerations
Sanitary landfilling is now widely utilized for the disposal
of solid waste. Careful planning and the application of sound
engineering principles to all facets of disposal site selection,
design, construction, and operation help insure that the environ-
mental impact of landfillfng is minimal and, in many cases, bene-
ficial. With increased use and public awareness of this method of
disposal, increased interest has also developed with respect to
the pollution potential of leachate emanating from a landfill, its
possible detrimental effects upon surface water and groundwater, and
a realization that in some cases, interception and treatment of
this liquid may be necessary. Considerable research on leachate
treatment is presently on-going tn many laboratories.
Leachate production has been frequently documented by field
observations and case histories. Production of leachate is most
prevalent in geographical areas which have relatively high annual
rainfall. Limited data collected to date indicate that fresh
(initial) leachates are extremely high in both organic and in-
organic constituents and provide potential sources of significant
amounts of pollutants. Subsequent leachate contains less pollutants
as t i me passes.
A large number of variables can interact to produce variable
quantity and quality of leachate from landfills. A few of the
relevant parameters affecting leachate quantity and quality are:
annual rainfall, runoff, infiltration, evaporation, freezing,
transpiration, ambient temperature, waste composition, waste density,
initial moisutre content, and depth of landfill. Additional
variables are macro and micro nutrients, and toxic elements and
compounds.
22
-------
Studies of leachate composition indicate wide variation from
site to site and at any given site with time. A summary of typical
leachate composition is provided in Table 2. Adding to the com-
plexity of the problem is the fact that the volume of leachate
produced frequently varies widely over time at any one site.
The biologic decomposition of organic wastes also generates
gas of varying composition. The gas usually consists of varying
concentrations of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and methane,
The gas composition reflects the type and extent of biologic pro-
cesses occurring in the refuse.
This study was designed to investigate the effect of several
modes of operation upon the rate and extent of stabilization of
municipal refuse in sanitary landfills. Five test cells were
constructed and subjected to the operational modes presented in
Table 1. The modes of operation chosen for this study include:
(1) addition of an excess volume of water after refuse emplacement,
(2) continual through-flushing with water, (3) rec5rculatSon of
leachate, and (4) addition of septic tank pumplngs to the landfall
materials.
The extent of refuse stabilization was evaluated principally
by monitoring leachate and gas composition during a two and one
half year period. Primary leachate composition parameters monitored
included biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand
(COD), pH, alkalinity, volatile acids, phosphate, and forms of
nitrogen. In addition, electrical conductivity, temperature, and
various inorganic anions and cations were monitored to define
leachate composition.. The time response of these parameters is
presented in Figures 10 through 40. A discussion and comparison
of refuse composition is presented, followed by a short discussion
of the general effect of seasonal variation of moisture content,
rainfall infiltration, and temperature, after which each test cell
is discussed separately with comparisons made to both the control
cell and to literature information.
Refuse Composition
Refuse compositional analysis data is presented in Appendix E
and is summarized in Table 3, Refuse Moisture Content Summary, and
Table *•, Refuse Composition Summary. Both moisture and weight
23
-------
percentage figures for the various waste constituents are quite
similar for all cells. The average weight percentage of waste
constituents from all cells are compared with similar compositional
data for the City of Berkeley, California, the County of Santa Clara,
California (Golueke & McGauhey, 1970), and work by Dr. Pohland
at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Table 5- The average
values determined for the various waste constituents in the Sonoma
County study are reasonably similar to the values developed for
the City of Berkeley and the County of Santa Clara. Each of the
California studies differ significantly from Dr. Pohland's Georgia
study in percentage of textiles, metals, glass and food wastes.
Data from Dr. Pohland's study is included, as several of his project
objectives parallel objectives of this study.
The Sonoma stu.dy developed a somewhat lower percentage by
weight of paper as compared to the City of Berkeley, Santa CHara
County and Dr. Pohland.'s study figures. Frequently, paper is re-
ported in the literature as comprising over *»5 percent of the total
waste. The most recent finding by the National Center for Resource
Recovery (1973)> however, indicates the national average of paper
content is 35 percent.
Moisture Content
Moisture content of landfill materials during active decom-
position of organic components is one of the most important In
situ factors affecting the rate and nature of biological processes
as well as the quantity and quality of the gas and quality of the
liquid leachate ultimately produced. All sources of moisture must
be considered important, and they are: water content of initial
refuse, metabolic water formed during decomposition (usually
minor), infiltration water due to rainfall or groundwater, and
any art 5 f. icidlil.y added water.
In this study five test cells have been utilized to investigate,
among other things, five different moisture regimes (Table 1). The
usefulness and practicality of operationally controlling or modify-
ing the moisture content of a solid waste landfill has been
approached from a two-fold point of view: (1) to study the resultant
change, if any, in rate of stabilization of the landfill materials,
and (2) to investigate the quality of leachate produced both as a
-------
m««sur« of (1) above and •* • measure of potential pollution of
adjacent groundwater sources.
The test conditions chosen for this study were (1) ambient
moisture conditions of the refuse material and any natural Infil-
tration water (Cell A); (2) cell refuse materials brought to field
capacity* by addition of fresh water and then no further Intentional
additions of water (Cell B); (3) fresh water added to the top of the
refuse and removed from the base at a rate of 700> gallons per day
continuously (Cell C); (k) leachate recirculated through the refuse
at the rate of 1000+^ gallons per day using freshwater make-up as
necessary to compensate for losses (Cell D); (5) cell refuse
materials brought to field capacity by the addition of septic tank
pumplngs and then no further intentional liquid additions (Cell £)„
In each case, refuse was emplaced in a cell constructed with im-
pervious clay base and walls. The cell surface was then sealed
with an impervious layer of clay to preclude infiltration.
It soon became obvious that little or no leachate would be
produced in Cells A, B and E unless additional water was added.
Since leachate analysis data comprised the principal evaluation
methodology in the program, it was apparent that additional water
Input to these cells was necessary to develop some leachate for
testing and analysis. Consequently, rather than seal surface
i
cracks resulting from summer drying, winter rainfall was permitted
to find its way into the cell refuse by short circuiting through
cracks in the cover material. After some surface water from the
first winter rains entered the refuse, natural swelling of the soil
sealed the surface cracks and thereafter the cover material was
relatively impervious.
Infiltration water influences the moisture content of the
cells, and hence, the process of refuse stabilization. Rainfall
records (Figure 30) for the study site show very little precipita-
tion occurred during the first winter (1971-72). In addition,
the cells were completed in the winter and no drying cracks occurred
• i' i
*Fi eld capacity is defined as the condition achieved by adding water
to the point where a significant volume of leachate is just
produced.
25
-------
in this first rainy season. Consequently, very little leachate
developed as a result of infiltration. The second winter
(1972-73) however, was a year of near-record rainfall, and leachate
was developed in all cells, indicating infiltration. The pattern
of increased leachate production following heavy rainfall was
repeated during winter 1973-71* (Figure 30).
Cell D was a fully saturated system prior to the heavy 1972-73
winter rains and has been monitored on a continuous basis. Prior
to the winter rains, (before November 1972), the quantity of re-
circulated leachate applied to Cell D was approximately 6,000 to
8,000 gallons per week (Figure 33). The max Imum quantity of re-
circulated leachate put through Cell D was approximately 37,000
gallons per week (February and Harch 1973). This large Increased
volume of recycled leachate was due primarily to Infiltrated rain-
water, as is evidenced by a repeated Increase In recycled leachate
following heavy rainfall In winter 1973-71*, with maximum recycled
volume occurring during March-April, 197^ (Figure 33).
There are some differences In Infiltration rates between cells.
The refuse in both Cells B and E was wetted to field capacity,
but the cells responded to the Initial Infiltrated volume of rain
water (winter 1972-73) in different manners (Figure 30). It is
not clear why the rate of leachate production was so different
between Cells B and E during this time, but it may have resulted
from a combination of different permeability of the soil cover
layer and differences in the rate of stabilization due to mode of
operation. Cell E was originally seeded with 27,200 gallons of
septic tank pumpings and also received 7,^00 gallons of rainfall
before the cell cover was placed. The cell gave early indications .
of vigorous anaerobic biological activity. Approximately 41,000
gallons of water were added to Cell B to bring it to field capacity
before the top cover was applied (Table 1). When compared to con-
trol Cell A, both Cells B and E show considerably greater production
of leachate. Leachate production during and following heavy winter
26
-------
rains (1973~7M indicates that on a cumulative basis Cell B and
Cell E are presently substantially equivalent in terms of leachate
volume produced.
Thermal Response '
Although chemical and biological processes are, In general,
termperature dependent both as to rate and ultimate equilibria, it
is not reasonable at the present time to speculate on the effect
of temperature on leachate composition other than in general terms.
The multiplicity of chemical and biological processes occurring
within a landfill are so complex as to preclude any attempt at
rigorous treatment. On the other hand, observation indicates
real differences in cell temperatures with time, depth and mode
of operat ion.
The seasonal temperature variations for this study (Figures
3^-39) show an ambient range of almost 20° C. over the annual cycle.
In general, there is an apparent temperature response of the upper
several feet of the landfill to long term (seasonal, annual!)
variations in mean ambient temperature (monthly mean)*, while the
deeper materials tend to show a smaller response (figures 35-39).
An annual mean temperature variation of 16° C. was observed at the
site of this study, but larger annual temperature changes would be
expected under different c 1 i ma to 1 og i ca 1 conditions., Short term
(diurnal) variations in ambient air temperature appeared to have
no appreciable effect on the cell temperature regime.
The literature on both diurnal and annual cycles of heating
and cooling of soil shows a typical lag in heating and cooling
at depth compared to the annual or diurnal surface cycle (Geiger,
1965; Singer and Brown (1956)* The exact lag depends upon latitude,
media porosity, and depth from surface (Strahler and StrahHer, 1973)
For each climate region there is a depth below which the soil or
rock temperature is essentially unchanging year round, and this
^National Weather Service Data collected
at Petaluma, California Fire Station No,, 2
27
-------
temperature is typically very close to the average annual a ii r
temperature near the ground surface (Strahler, 1971; Rlehl, 1972).
Thermal response of Cells A, B and E as a function of depth
over two complete annual cycles is depicted in Figures 35, 36 and
37° Cells A, B and E have not been disturbed in any way since
placement of initial materials. Typical moderation of maximum
and minimum temperature is seen with increase in depth as is the
shift in time of maximum thermal response as compared to mean am-
bient air temperature. In contrast, Cells C and D, which receive
daily applications of liquid, show a pronounced thermal response
over the whole depth with the seasonal cycle (Figures 38 and 39)-
This corresponds to both the mean monthly air temperature and the
temperature of water added (Cell C) and the 1eachate rec5rcu 1 ated
(Cell D). This termal response over the total depth of the cell
reflects the fact that the temperature of the applied liquid tends
to approach mean ambient air temperature at the time of application
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
General
Experience with sampling procedures and analytical methods on
numerous samples of leachate has necessitated changes in both
sampling techniques and analytical methods. The need for such
changes was generally anticipated, but it was not possible to
specifically predict them, as leachate exhibits a complex and
changing nature.
The following general statements can be made about analytical
methods as related to leachate tests:
1. The analytical philosophy should be one of attention to
accuracy rather than precision,,
2. The analysis 5s made difficult by the danger of inter-
ferences due to the high concentration of solutes and
the changing nature of the leachate,
3<> Color Smetr i c methods are generally not applicable due to
the complex nature of the solution and the high
background color of undiluted leachate samples. For
28
-------
example, it Is not possible to analyze for calcium and
magnesium on undiluted leachate samples using the
normal EDTA titrimetric technique due to masking of the
end point by background color.
*. The concentrations of most common constituents In leachate
are generally very high and require dilution prior to
analys is,
5. Matrix effects were observed In the analysis of some
parameters.
Experience with analysis of several leachate constituents has
indicated unusual and persistent problems. Specifically, these
are analysis of total phosphate, chloride, BOD and COO A
significant fraction of the total phosphate in solution appears
to be of a refractory nature and has thus required strict adher-
ence to th. digestion sequence utilizing the sulfuric acid-nitric
acid digestion sequence (APHA, 1971, p. 525). Chloride analysis
has been subject to considerable interference when colorimetrlc
methods have been used. On undiluted leachate samples, It may
on occasion be necessary to use a potentIometrIc tltration tech-
n Ique.
BOD/COD determinations of leachates cannot be expected
to exhibit the precision usually attributed to them due to the
complexity of the solutions. Among the many factors which
could contribute to this lack of precision 4r. tne fe,lowMg:
U) high toxlclty in some leachate samples causing a marked
depression of the BOD values; (2) high levels of halogens in
the leachate may have resulted In inadequate levels of mercuric
sulfate being added, thus giving high COD values due to
oxidation of chlorides to chlorine; (3) certain low to moderate
molecular weight fatty acids are not oxidized by the COD
methodology unless high levels of silver sulphate- catalyst
are present; (*) ammonia will oxidize biologically but not be
represented in the COD determination due to losses by
volatilization. Considering the multitude of contributory
factors and the fact that BOD values are frequently close
to those for COD, one would expect on a statistical basis,
Reproduced from
b«st available copy.
-------
that BODiCOD ratios might occasionally occur that would be greater
than one. These inversions have indeed been observed, primarily
in the more recent determinations for Cell C. (See tabulated data
i n Append i x H).
Total Suspended Solids
Analytical measurement of total suspended solids (TSS) in leachate
samples is subject to possible error because of the oxidation of
reduced iron and manganese and the subsequent precipitation of
ferric hydroxide and manganese dioxide in the sample. Depending
upon the sequence of sampling and the care of analyses, experience
has shown that an inordinate variation in measured total suspended
solids (TSS) results (See tabulated data in Appendix H). Our
experience has shown that when proper care is taken to avoid the
formation of precipitate in the sample, that TSS is generally
low (50 ppm).
Considering that great care must be taken at all points in
the handling of the sample to avoid introduction of oxygen prior
to measurement of TSS and also that the data are marginal in
terms of interpretive value, measurement of TSS in leachate is not
recommended and was discontinued prior to the third year of this
study.
Co lor
Quantitative measurement of color is useful only to the extent
that it measures the relative intensity of this parameter and
may be correlatable with other more meaningful measurements. Since
even slight turbidity (suspended solids) causes the apparent color
to be noticeably higher than the true color, it is necessary to
remove suspended material before true color can be approximated.
Removal of suspended solids is normally done by centrifugation.
Measurement of color in leachate samples is somewhat com-
plicated by the fact that diffusion of oxygen into the leachate
sample causes the oxidation of reduced Fe and Mn solution species,
and, hence, the precipitation of the hydroxide and dioxide,
30
-------
respectively. The formation of small, colloidal solids inter-
feres with the color measurement, and due to the high concentra-
tion of reduced iron (and probably Mn) in solution, it is necessary
to either (1) prevent oxidation and precipitation from occurring,
or (2) allow complete oxidation and precipitation to occur and
remove the precipitate by centrifugation.
The first procedure, preventing diffusion of oxygen into
the sample, requires care in handling of the sample at all points
of transfer prior to analysis. The second procedure is more time
consuming than the first and may still result in very small colloida
particles remaining in solution despite centrifugation. Given the
limited value of the color measurements to begin with and the
handling problems discussed above, measurement of color in leachate
is not recommended and was discontinued during the second year
of this study,.
Electro-Conductivity Ratios
A review of leachate quality (both from literature and this
study) shows a wide varration in concentrations of measured
constituents running over several orders of magnitude. Consequently
there are typically problems of dilution associated with analytical
determination of most chemical constituents,.
Selection of the degree of dilution required for various analy-
tical tests is complicated by the changing nature of leachate
as a function of time and sfte. Since electro-conductivity (EC)
is essentially a measure of the concentration of dissolved ions
in solution, there is a strong possibility that a correlation
between EC and major ionic species can be made. The correlation
between EC and other chemical parameters has therefore been
investigated as a possible aid in predicting a proper dilution
ratio.
Results utilizing the available data indicate the EC ratios
may prove of value in estimating dilution requirements for some
parameters. Ratio data for leachate from Cells C and D are
presented in Tables 6 and 7 Especially good correlation is found
between EC and alkalinity, BOD, COD, Na and «„ Somewhat greater
-------
scatter is seen for the data on calcium and magnesium. The large
standard deviation in data on sulfate is expected since SOi,
is a reactive compound under reducing conditions and hence should
not be expected to follow EC values consistently, although
F.C/SO^"2 ratios should increase as SO^ is reduced to sulfide.
Except for magnesium and sulfate, the EC ratios for Cells C
and D are surprisingly close. This indicates that, at least for
these few parameters, EC ratios can be used effectively in esti-
mating concentrations for dilution in the laboratory. This may
be especially useful in cases where spot samples are brought in
for analysis with no prior information on the leachate composition.
Typically, there is less than a factor of two variation in
the range of EC/parameter ratios for alkalinity, calcium, chloride,
magnesium, potassium, sodium, and TDS (see 18-week averages in
Tables 6 and 7). Considering the variation in absolute concentra-
tions of several orders of magnitude, it appears that there is
considerable merit in the use of EC/parameter ratios for predicting
di1ut i on rat i os *
Of special interest is the fact that EC/BOD and EC/COD ratios
increased by almost an order of magnitude in Cell D when vigorous
methane fermentation began and when pH increased (12/73 on), in-
dicating that BOD and COO dropped dramatically in absolute
value, while general concentrations of electrolytes remained high.
In contrast, EC/BOD and EC/COD ratios for Cell C (Table 6) remained
extremely stable, varying less than a factor of two over the
whole test period (for Cell C: EC/BOD mean of O.i»2± 0.15, tC/COD
mean of 0.31* 0.09, and for Cell D: EC/BOD mean of 0.^5* 0.12,
EC/COD mean of 0.33* 0.10).
Gas Analyzer
In addition to its use as a pump to withdraw gas samples from
i. iie gas probes, the gas analyzer also registers exp 1 os i b i 1 i ty of
the gas.
Although the value registered is not used to determine
precise percentages of gases present, the instrument can be used
to detect the presence of combustible gases in air.
32
-------
The rm i s to rs
In order to establish that thermistors installed within the
gas probe conduits register temperature representative of the
refuse at that location thermistors were installed both inside and
outside the top gas probe in Cell B No appreciable difference
in temperature was registered by the thermistors,, The compara-
tive data is presented in Table 8.,
Gas Samp 1 ing
The initial gas samples obtained 12/8/71 were collected in
large evacuated sample bottles and are considered to be uncon-
taminated samples.. These teat results are therefore reliable,
Samples taken between 1/3/72 and 3/1^/72 were collected utilizing
a flushing technique which resulted in collection of samples
contaminated with atmospner.c air Subsequent modification of
the sampling technique to include evacuation of the sample bottle
eliminated this problem Test results commencing 3/28/72 are
considered representative of the gas produced in the refuse cells.
33
-------
TEST CELLS; TREATMENT, PURPOSE AND RESULTS
Variability of Leachate Composition
The number of studies on leachate derived from sanitary land-
fills is increasing rapidly,. Table 2 provides a summary of ranges
reported for parameters measured on leachates. Tables 9 and 10
summarize the conditions under which the laboratory and field
studies were conducted to allow some comparison with the study
presented in this report., The range of values for the parameters
listed in Table 2 indicate a significant variation from site to
site as well as wide variations over time at any given site* As
described earlier, the five test cells utilized in this study
were managed in different ways in order to evaluate the effects
of the various operational modes. Discussion of the results ob-
tained from the test cells follows, beginning with a short dis-
cussion of the reactivity of cell ' construct ion materials,.
Reactivity of Cell Construction Materials
In order to establish if percolation of additive water and
leachate was appreciably changed in quality due to solution', of
the granular materials utilized to distribute the liquids over
Cells C and D, 20 gram samples of material were placed in dis-
tilled water in 300 ml. BOD bottles. Four sample bottles were
prepared for each of the three granular materials. A schedule
was established to test the water at time intervals of one week,
six months, one year, and two years, respective1y„ The tests
include pH, alkalinity, Na, K, Ca, Mg, and electrical conduc-
tivity determinations.
Test results (Table 11) indicate that only insignificant
quantities of dissolved materials are contributed by the granular
materials used in the test cells. The general composition of water
in continual contact with the granular materials appears to be
relatively stable In each case except for pH, The test bottles
were exposed to sunlight during the latter part of the test,
allowing algal growths to develop. Consequently, the decreasing
alkalinity, calcium and magnesium probably reflect biological
activity rather than some chemical process. The silty sand,
-------
concrete sand and pea grave) all exhibit about the same solution
characteristics, none of which indicate any substantial contri-
bution to the leachate composition,,
Cell A - Control Test Cell
Cell A was constructed in accordance with normal sanitary
landfill practice and covered after the cell was filled with
refuse with no artificial addition of moisture, A total of 530,35
tons of refuse (997 yd 3) were placed, giving an average density
after compaction of about 106^ lb,./yd,30 The average initial
moisture content (percent wet weight) was 28 k percent (Table
12),
Leachate and Gas Composition: The first significant quantity
of leachate was collected from Cell A in October 1972, During
this period the first rainfall of the winter was recorded.
Prior to the rains the soil cover exhibited numerous random
shrinkage cracks* Apparently a considerable volume of storm
water infiltrated Cell A (see Figure 30) before the clay cover
swelled, sealing the cracks, it is obvious that the volume of
leachate produced by Cell A as of May, 1971* is significantly
less than for either Cell B or E,
Data for leachaie samples for Cell A prior to November
1972 indicate, in general, very low values for the compositional
parameters when compared with leachate from other test cells
These low values prior to November 1972 may indicate that the
initial leachate samples were condensate and, hence, did not
carry the normal load ot dissolved and suspended materials found
in leachate The volume ot leachate collected p :• i o r to September
1972 also supports th.s hypothesis (Appendix H) in particular,
highly soluble elect .-oiytes Such as K, Na and C) were found
in low con cen t s a t - on until afte*" hea\/y winter rains produced a
35
-------
significant quantity of leachate (Figure 30). Parameters show-
ing marked increase after November 1972 are EC, IDS, Ca, Mg, SO,,
volatile acids and alkalinity. The pH remained at about 5-0 as
expected because of the high partial pressure of carbon dioxide.
As a consequence of the limited data little can be said about the
activity within Cell A prior to October 1972, after which time
production of 1eachate a 1 lowed consistent monitoring. Settlement
data, presented in Figure k1, indicate that little settling
occurred before the 1972-73 winter rains. In fact, a settlement
deflection occurred between September and November 1972 commen-
surate with early heavy winter rains. Apparently, compaction
within the cell occurred due to an increase in total weight
caused by infiltrating water.
Following the winter rains of 1973~7^» a significant volume
of leachate was produced (Figure 30) and compositional data
indicate general reducing conditions with a pH of about 5.0 and
steadily increasing concentrations of most chemical constituents,
This general trend can be explained almost totally on the basis
of the increasing quantities of water finding its way Into the
test cell, thus allowing more vigorous microbial activity as
well as increased opportunity for solubi11zation of many con-
st i tuents.
Although initial levels of both phosphorus (P) and nitrogen
(N) were somewhat low in comparison to nutrient content in other
leachates, they were sufficient for biological activity a>nd, as
can be seen in Figures 18, 19, 20 and 21, the nutrients Increased
in concentration as increasing quantities of leachate were pro-
duced. Biodegradation of organic material is proceeding as evi-
denced by the high concentration of C0_ (large partial pressure)
and the increase in volatile acids. Methane has been measured
(Figure kQ) in low concentration (1% by volume), indicating
the presence of methanogentc organisms, even though conditions
in the cell are far f rom op t i ma 1 . •' I; •>. • ; :',.:. * : " '...•'.. v i. I i i.
36
-------
Trace metals data (Table 13) indicate that Cd was consist-
ently below the detection limits for the analytical methods
used prior to January 197^ Since the 1962 U.S. Public Health
Service Drinking Water Standard of 0„0i ppm for Cd is below the
detection limit of the analytical method employed, nothing
can be said concerning Cd as a potential hazard relative to the
Drinking Water Standards except for the last three data points,
all of which are above USPHS Standards. Cu has been found
(Table 13) in the 0 „ 1 - 1„0 ppm range, but is generally below
the USPHS Standards (1.0 ppm),. Zn , Pb and Hg, however, appear
to be consistently present in the leachate in quantities above
or near the Drinking Water Standards (USPHS Standards: Zn-5 ppm,
Pb-50 ppb, Hg-5 ppb). An analysis of the potential for contamina-
tion of grouridwater by these metals must take into consideration
the likely reactions between the leachate and the soil through
which the leachate must pass to enter the groundwater aquifer
and potential removal mechanisms such as ion exchange, adsorption
and prec i p i t at i on
General trends for soluble electrolytes such as Cl, Na ,
K, Mg and Ca correlate well with similar increasing trends for
total dissolved solids (Figure 1A) and electro-conductivity
values (Figure 15) Increasing concentration of sulfate (Figure
17) ind.cates that the general reducing environment is not
severe enough to use sulfate as the electron acceptor in rrucrobial
metabolism and hence the internal environment is apparently not
generally su«tabie for vigorous methane production,
Cell B - F.eld Capacity Test CeM
Cell B .s different from Cell A only in the respect that
41,000 gallons of water were added to bring the eel' up to
field capacity before the cover material was placed A total
of 5 2 *» 23 tons of refuse (997 yd 3 j were piaced, giving an average
density after compaction of about 1052 Ib /yd * The average
initial moisture content (percent wet we.ght) was 27.3 percent,
The added wate- brought the mo > s i u •• e content up to ^52 percent
at f.e'd capacity (Table '2)
37
-------
Leachate and Gas Composition: The initial addition of moisture
to Cell B was intended to bring the refuse moisture content to
field capacity, thus allowing any subsequent addition of water
to generate a nearly proportionate amount of leachate. The
cumulative record of leachate production for Cell B (Figure 30)
shows the increase in leachate production resulting from early
winter rains (9/72 - 11/72). The short duration of Increased
leachate production suggests that open cracks in the soil cover
were apparently sealed due to swelling, once the cover material
was saturated with moisture. Apparently, infiltration was re-
latively-significant prior to the natural sealing of the cell
cover material. Data for cumulative leachate production (figure
30) show only a minor volume of leachate produced during the
1973-7^ winter period, immediately after the first heavy rainfall,
again indicating an infiltration - sealing sequence. This is in
direct contrast to Cell E, which produced a large volume of leachate
during the same time period. On the other hand, Cell A leachate
volume during the 1973-7'* winter period was almost negligible.
Data on leachate composition must be separated into two
time periods. The first Is the period from 12/71 immedi-
ately after Cell B was brought to field capacity and the onset
of the winter rains in October 1972. The second period covers
the time interval starting with the winter rains of 1972-73
(10/72 on). Nothing significant can be said about data developed
during the earlier period. This first set of data are scattered
and generally reflect concentrations of components in leachates
in the ranges reported in literature.
Leachate composition data for the second time period re-
flect real changes and can be explained in terms of volume flow-
through and biological activity within the cell. Generally
speaking, it can be said that there continues to be anaerobic
bIodegradation within the cell, and changes in gas composition
(Figure kQ) as of winter 1973-7^ mark the beginning of signifi-
cant methane production. This production of methane is in
38
-------
sharp contrast with normal indicator parameters such as pH and
volatile acids (Figures 26 and II). Ph remains low ( 5) and
volatile acids remain high ( 15,000 mg/1). However, a similar
response was noted in Cell C where significant methane production
occurred (7/72 - 12/72), while pH remained low and volatile
acids high. This is easily explained by the heterogeneous nature
of the landfill environment, where many microenvfronments may
exist simu1taneious1y. Apparently, general conditions within
the cell necessary for sulfate reduction have not developed,
as is evidenced by continued high SOjj concentrations (Figure 17).
Trends from October 1972 on, for all parameters (except pH
and P) indicate a possible dilution mechanism acting to lower
concentrations during periods of significant infiltration.
The decreases in concentration for most parameters coincides
with periods of heavy winter rains (10/72 - 3/73 and 11/73 - 3/7M
This is especially evident in trends for TDS and EC, both of
which reflect decreasing concentrations with time (Figures 1 *»
and 15)- Na, K, Ca, Mg, and Cl, as well as volatile acids,
alkalinity, BOD, COD, and organic nitrogen and ammonia (Figures
10 through 25) all reflect decreases in concentration commen-
surate with increases in total volume of leachate produced
(Figure 30).
Thermal response of Cell B shows trends consistent with
literature data on thermal response of soil gases (see section
on Thermal Response for more complete discussion).
Trace metals data (Table 13) show compositions for Cell B
similar to those for Cell A. Again, Zn, Pb and Hg tend to be
at or above the USPHS Standards, while Cu generally is below 1
ppm (except on 1/3/72) Cd has been detected regularly and is
typically well above the accepted USPHS Drinking Water Standard.
The data for Cell B can be interpreted in terms of several
parallel ongoing processes The general upward trend of con-
centrations in between periods of diluti.on due to infiltration
water indicates ongoing decomposition processes leading to
39
-------
release of soluble materials, especially inorganic salts.
Although the increased moisture content during periods of in-
filtration initially tends to act as a dilutant, the secondary
effect would be to stimulate microbial activity (Alexander
1971), thus leading to increased release of more soluble materials.
The rate of settlement for Cell B is quite similar to the
rate of settlement for Cells A and E (Figure k1), even though
leachate production has been somewhat different.
Cell C - Continuous Flow-Through Test Cell
Cell C contains:a total of 521.72 tons of refuse with an
average initia 1 density after compaction of 106*» Ib/yd . The aver-
age initial moisture content (percent wet weight) was 25-6 percent
(Table 12). The moisture content (percent total weight) at field
capacity was estimated to be near 60 percent .(assuming about 50
percent porosity for placed materia 1 after compaction). Water was
applied to Cell C at a rate of approximately 700 gallons per day.
The general effects of this mode of operation are discussed below.
Leachate generated by this cell is disposed of by injection
into a well in the adjacent County sanitary landfill.
Leachate and Gas Composition; General time responses for leachate
composition parameters indicate decreasing concentrations for all
parameters (except pH). This general decrease reflects the
basic flushing action of the water added to the cell in parallel
with ongoing anaerobic biodegradation of the fill materials. The
2
rate of addition of water to Cell C was designed to 0, *» gal/ft /day
Figure 31 presents the cumulative distribution and collection of
liquid for Cell C. The slope of the distribution curve is 19-35
•» "2
x 10 gal/month, or 0.3U gal/ft /day, slightly under the design
capacity. The slope of the cumulative volume collected from
•» y
Cell C is 15.86 x 10 gal/month, or 0.22 gal/ft /day, an average
loss of about 18 percent, which can be attributed basically to
evapotranspi rat ion.
The continuous steady application of water to Cell C has
resulted in a moderation of the thermal response of the upper
layers in the cell as is reflected in Figure 38. This thermal
-------
response is different for Cells A, B and E, and more closely
resembles the thermal response of Cell D, where continuous
recycle of liquid also seems to be reflected in a stable temper-
ature profile through the depth of the cell (Figures 35-39)*
A more detailed discussion of thermal ' response is given on
page 27.
Trends in the data for gas composition, alkalinity, volatile
acids, BOD, COO, organic end ammonia nitrogen, and suSfate all
indicate vigorous anaerobic microbial activity within the cell.
In spite of the low pH (Ca. 5-0) methane is being produced at
increasing rates (Figure kQ). The decrease in SO. from earlier
levels indicates that sufficient reduc5ng, cond5tions exist for the
reduction of suifate to sulfide in the general environment (sulfate
acting as an electron acceptor). The apparent contradiction of low
pH and significant methane production can be explained directly on
the basis of variations in local environments (so-called micro-
environments). Because of the dissimilarities in the physical
and chemical determinants In a heterogeneous environment and
the consequent establishment of somewhat distinct microbial
communities in the spatially separate microhabitats, one popu-
lation may be subjected to diverse stresses in the adjoining
microenvironments„ Thus, knowing that appropriate conditions
can exist in localized regions within the cell, it 9s quite
normal for vigorous activity of methanogenfc organisms to occur
in what might otherwise appear unfavorable conditions,
The vigor of the biodegradation processes is reflected in
the increasing percentage of NH, - nitrogen and decreasing per-
centage of organic nitrogen (Figures 20 and 21). The strength
of the reducing conditions is reflected by the low level of NO.
(figure 19) and the smooth decrease of SO. (Figure 17)° Sulfate,
a strong anionic electrolyte under oxidizing conditions, would
typically follow the same trends as C1 (Figure 16) which
generally functions as a quasi-conservative material. However,
under appropriate reducing conditions, sulfate is utilized as an
electron acceptor and is reduced to sulfide during bio-oxidation
of organic matter. The presence of CH. and decreasing SO.
indicates strong reducing conditions.
Reproduced from
best available copy.
-------
Nutrient concentrations (P and N) indicate that sufficient
quantities of nitrogen and phosphorus are available for biological
growth. After almost three years of continual flushing, total
phosphate remains about 5-10 mg/1, substantially above minimal
nutrient requirements for most organisms. It appears that the
flushing action will continue to remove nutrients from the cell
and may eventually lead to nutrient limited biological activity,
depending upon the availability of organic substates as well.
Ammonia nitrogen is decreasing, but at 50-100 mg/1 still remains
far in excess of nutritional requirements for most anaerobic
micro-organisms. It appears from present trends, that macro
and micronutrients are being depleted and/or removed at comparable
rates .
The quantity of oxygen contained in the water added to Cell
C may eventually affect the general composition of the leached
liquid, but at the present time, it appears not to be exerting
a strong influence. There is the possibility that added water
with substantial Q£ concentration could be toxic to the anaerobic
organisms present in the landfill. It is also likely that the
oxygen would be consumed rather rapidly as the water moves through
the cell depth and, hence, only the upper layer would be affected.
This toxic behavior of oxygen would be reflected In the gas
composition, generally causing a lower production of methane
since molecular oxygen is known to be extremely toxic to methan-
ogen i c organ i sras.
Concentrations of dissolved materials and electrolytes
as reflected by the gross measurement parameters TDS and EC
(Figures \k and 15) show a rather smooth trend toward lower
concentrations. Specific parameters such as Na, K, Ca, Mg and
Cl reflect the same trends. The decreasing concentrations are
compatible with vigorous biodegradation since inorganic salts
and refractory organic solutes are expected end products of the
bio-oxidation process and should be easily washed out. The
early data (first 6 months) showing high concentrations of
electrolytes should reflect the flushing out of readily
solubilized material, leaving behind those materials requiring
b i odeg radat i on.
J»2
-------
Trace heavy metals data (Table lA) indicate that, except for
Cd, all metals monitored are present in substantial quantities,,
The concentrations of these metals are high but compatible with
a low pH and the presence of dissolved organic solutes which can
act as chelating agents- Except for Zn, no trends are apparent.
Zn concentrations are decreasing with time, indicating a
flushing action, Zn, Pb and Hg are all high when compared to
USPHS Drinking Water Standards and pose a potential pollutional
hazard to groundwater and surface water sources. Recognition
of the potential hazard is important,
The rate of settlement of Cell C (Figure kI) is more rapid
than the rate of settlement for Cell A, B, and E „ Cell C has
had continual throughput of water and the data Indicate
accelerated compaction compared to control Cell A, Settling
behavior of Cell C is similar to Cell D, Similar observations
were made by Mao and Portland M973) on the rate of settling of
simulated landfills where leachate was recircuIated,
The presence of po l y ch I of i nated bi'phen/ls (.PCB) was detected
on 3/2/72 at an 0.35 ppb level and 0,1*0 ppb on 3/28/72, However,
none has been detected in subsequent analyses Since there is
no experience to allow prediction of time-concentration response
for PCB's under the conditions present in the test cell, further
monitoring of this parameter was justified at a reduced frequency.
It should be noted that in the process of analyzing for PCB's,
other chlorinated hydrocarbons have been detected Specifically,
Lindane was found at the 0.06 ppb level on 12/28/71, No systematic
appearance of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides is evident and
hence does not appear to be a major concern in this study.
The concentration of fecal coliform and fecal streptococci
(Figure 28 and 29) ndicate a gradual d ; e - o f f of these organisms
in CeM C, simi'ar to observations in other cells. it was
expected that natural competition and inhibition processes would
cause a reduction in the active organism level as has been
observed
-------
Cell D - Continuous Leachate Recycle Test Cell
Cell D contains a total of 530.07 tons of refuse with an
average initial density after compaction of 1065 Ib/ycP. The
average initial moisture content (percent bulk weight) was 22.7
percent (Table 12). After saturation, it is estimated that
moisture content (percent total weight) is near 60 percent
(assuming about 50 percent porosity for placed material after
compaction). Leachate is recycled.and redistributed to Cell D
at the rate of about 1,000 gallons per day. The time response
of leachate and gas composition are discussed below for this
mode of operation.
Leachate and Gas Composition: The fluid routing for Cell
D over the test period is presented in Figure 33. It is evident
that the volume of recycled leachate has deviated by at least a
factor of 10 during the test to date.
Infiltrated rainwater added to the volume of leachate de-
veloped during the heavy winter rains of 1972-73 and 1973-7A
(Figure 32), with the total volume of FnfF1trated water being
significantly less during wFnter 1973-7**. The daily volume of
recycled leachate varFed from a low of about 500 gal/day
(3500 gal/week) to a high of about 5,000 gal/day (37,000 gal/ week).
The surface loading rates for these daFly volumes are 0.2 gal/
ft2 / day and 2 gal/ft2 / day, respectfve1y. Data onileachate
composition indicate surprisingly stable concentration
conditions during the transition periods from low flow to high
flow, where one might expect an apparent dilution effect.
Na, K, Ca, and Mg show an initial leveling trend indicating that
some control mechanisms may be operating on these alkali and alka-
line earth metals during the early time period. These four
rnetals, usually quite soluble (at low to neutral pH values for
CA and Mg), show no major response to changes in leachate volume
during the periodslO/72 to 3/73 and 2/7^ to W71*. TDS and, to
some extent EC, also show a leveling trend commensurate with
the data for Na, K, Ca, Mg, as well as Cl and alkalinity. The
gradual decline in concentration of these parameters as shown
kk
-------
in Figures 22-25 indicates that removal processes of some sort
are acting to reduce the total mass remaining in solution. The
most probable maehanism for Ca and Mg is precipitation of some
,-' • • ' '; ; '
form of calcium-magnesium carbonate, especially after May 1973
when pH increased to 6.5 (Stumm and Morgan, 1970). A sample
calculation for soluble calcium in equilibrium with solid calcium
carbonate (calcite polymorph) and in the presence of ^000 mg/1
carbonate alkalinity at pH 6.5 gives a value of about 125 mg/1
+2 " '
Ca (using an activity coefficient of 0.2). Now, knowing that
a calcium-magnesium carbonate would be more soluble than calcite
(by at least a factor of 2) and assuming considerable complex Ing
of calcium in solution by organic chelates, it is interesting to
note that the calcium remaining in solution /300 mg/1
predicted, 350 mg/1 actual)- Additional possibilities, but
less probable, are adsorption and ion exchange, neither of which
could reasonably account for the mass of Ca and Mg removed from
solution in the recycled teachate.
Continuous recycling of leachate in Cell D has moderated
the thermal response of the upper layers in the cell as reflected
; . i'
in Figure 39- A more detailed discussion is presented earlier in
the report.
Active anaerobic biological activity is suggested by data
on gas composition, volatile acids and alkalinity. The production
of CH, increased sharply during the summer of 1972 and has continued
at 50% by volume since September 1972. These data suggest strongly
that conditions within the cell were accommodating methanogennc
organisms even when low pH was measured in the collected leachate
before August 1973° Thus, low pH in collected leachate cannot nec-
essarily be used as a criteria for viability of the pH-sens'i t J ve
methanogenic organisms. As mentioned earlier in discussion of
Cells B and C and in the general summary to follow, mtcroenviron-
ments are the rule rather than the exception, especially in hetero-
1 ' '
geneous media found in refuse. The strong reducing conditions
within the c@U are reflected in the absence of any substantial
nitrate (Figure 19), in the apparent reduction of sulfate (Figure
17) and in the high values for soluble reduced iron (Figure 27).
eproduced from
st available copy.
-------
The substantial reduction of soluble Iron occurring after August, 1973
corresponds to the period of Increasing pH and Increased mlcro-
blal metabolic activity. Thus, the reduction may be due to
microbial utilization as a nutrient. Both NO^ and SO^ are
utilized, sequentially, as electron acceptors during bio-oxida-
tion of organic material under strong reducing conditions. The
increasing percentage of ammonia compared to total nitrogen
indicates a more complete degradation of organic matter.
Substantial quantities of organic matter apparently accumulated
in the leachate as is reflected in the relatively stable BOD
and COD measurements (Figures 12 and 13) in the period up to
June, 1973-
The relatively high values for organic and ammonia nitro-
gen and the concentration of phosphate indicate that these
nutrients are not limiting to biological growth. The reduction
in phosphate concentration with time may be indicative of bio-
utilization of phosphate. Alternatively, precipitation of a
calcium and/or magnesium solid phase (such as a calcium apatite)
may be controlling the concentration of inorganic phosphate.
A balance of the major ions in solution can account for
most of the TDS, but the leachate solution is sufficiently complex
that it is doubtful whether any useful information can be gained
by attempting a mass balance on the measured ions and a com-
parison with TDS.
Heavy metals appear to be accumulating in the recycled
leachate. Inspection of values in Table 15 for Cu, Zn, Hg, and
Pb indicate a rather steady concentration pattern with time.
Cd does not follow this pattern within the detection limits of
the technique used. Cu has accumulated to about 0.1 - 0.2
ppm levels, below the USPHS drinking Water Standards. Zn (Ca 20
ppm) , Hg (Ca 10 ppb), and Pb (Ca 0.2-0.4 ppm) all are substantially
above the USPHS Standards for these metals. The high organic
content and low pH of the leachate solution are compatible with
the rather high levels of trace metalis prior to the increase in
pH (Ca 3/73). This is especially true for Zn. The decrease in
Zn concentrations correlate well with increased pH values which
A 6
-------
reflects the hydrolytic and solubility behavior of zinc. Com-
parison of heavy metals data collected for Cell D with data from
other leachates (Table 2) shows a general correspondence in
ranges of values observed.
The rate of settlement of Cell D (Figure 41) is very
similar to the settlement rate for Cell C, both of which have a
continual throughput of liquid. The settlement indicates
compaction and is consistent with the apparent biodegradation
occurring in both Cells C and D0 The increased magnitude in
Cell D as compared with Cell C probably represents the increased
stabilization reflected by high methanogenic activity. The
maximum settlement to May, 1974 reached a magnitude of approxi-
mately 6 inches, or about 7 percent of the refuse thickness.
This rate of settling i's similar to data for simulated landfills
(Mao and Pohland, 1973),
Polych1 orinated biphenyls were detected once on 3/28/72 at
the 0.2 ppb level. No subsequent analysis showed any PCB's
to be present. Lindane, a chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticide,
was detected at the 0,07 ppb level on 1/18/72. No subsequent
analysis shows evidence for the presence of pesticides.
Apparently most materials of this nature have been either de-
graded or are being retained within the cell and are not in the
leachate at detectable levels.
Data for fecal coltforra and fecal strep (Figures 28 and
29) indicate that there has been a gradual, but steady kill-off
of these organisms for all cells, including Cells C and D0 The
data confirm the expected results of microbial competition and
adaptation. The only surprising development is the fact that
there is such little difference between Cell E and Cells C and
D. Cell E, seeded with septic tank pumpings, might reasonably
be expected to have substantially more fecal organisms than
leachates from other cells,
The general behavior of leachate and gas composition for
Cell D reflects the general increased rate of biological stabiliza-
tion of the organic fraction of the fill refuse. Although the
data of Mao and Pohland (1973) show a much more rapid rate of
-------
refuse stabilization, the general trends are very similar and
kinetic differences can be explained simply on the basis of
toxicity and generally more concentrated leachate components.
Additional explanations may be possible, but it is more Important
to recognize the similarities than to explain the differences.
In fact, the data generated by this study are consistent with
and complimentary to those provided by the study of Mao and
Pohland (1973).
Cell E. - Biologically Seeded Test Cel1
Cell E was seeded with septic tank pumpings (27,200 gallons)
to provide microbial seed material to accelerate biological
degradation processes, and also to bring moisture content up
to field capacity. A total of 521.93 tons of refuse were placed,
giving an average initial density after compaction of about
10^7 Ib/yd3. The average initial moisture content (percent
wet weight) was 23.5 percent. The added septic tank pumpings
brought the moisture content up to 37.2 percent, approximately
at field capacity (Table 12). No additional management procedures
have been used on Cell E.
Leachate and Gas Composition; Only small volumes of leachate
were produced in Cell E prior to October, 1972. However, much
the same as for Cells A and B, Cell E has responded to precipita-
tion during 1972-73 and 1973~7^ winters by producing some measur-
able quantity of leachate (Figure 30). The cumulative leachate
volume (Figure 30) for Cell E has a time response somewhat
different from Cells A and B during winter 1972-73. It is not
understood at present why the t i.me response is so different during
this period. Data for Cell E shows a slow, smooth increase in
leachate production during the heavy winter rains only tapering
off after the precipitation of February, 1973- The most plausible
explanation for these data is that the top soil cover of Cell E
has a higher permeability compared to Cells A and B. A
higher permeability would allow slow but continuous infiltra-
tion of rainwater into the cell and would not necessarily exhibit
surface cracks. The less permeable soil with cracks would allow
-------
an immediate infiltration of rainfall, but once closed by swelling,
it would be relatively impervious. The data cannot be explained
by other differences in cell preparation and maintenance. The
time response for leachate production after 6/173 shows similar
behavior in Cells A, 8, and E.
The general trend of all parameters for Cell E (except pH)
appears to be toward increasing concentratton , in most cases
stabilizing at extremely high concentrations. For example,
volatile acids(Ca 20,000 mg/1), BOD(Ca 40,000 mg/1), COD (Ca 60,000
mg/1 ) , TDS (Ca 30,000 mg/1 ) , Cl (Ca 3,000 mg/1 ) ', sul fate (Ca 1500
mg/1), Initial pH values were around 6.0and considered along with
early gas composition and volatile acid data it is apparent
that biodegradation of organic matter was accelerated due to the
seeding with septic tank pump ings. However, it now appears
that the early biological activity may have been at the expense
of easily decomposable material, since data collected since
October, 1972 indicate increasing volatile acids, alkalinity,
BOD and COD (Figures 10-13) with a corresponding decrease in
pH to about 5 (Figure 26),, A similar response to seeding was
experienced by Mao and Pohland (1973) in their study of simulated
landfills. Their discussion suggested that accelerated acid
fermentation may overwhelm the buffer capacity, of the system
s
leading to suppression of methane formers.
The increasing concentration of readily soluble salts such
as Na, K, Ca, Mg, and Cl (Figures 16, 23-25) is reflected by
parallel increases in TDS and EC over time (Figures \k and 15)«
The general increase in concentration can best be explained as
a leaching of readily so tub Mi zed materials made available by the
early biodegradation of organic matter. This explanation is
supported by the opposite response to infiltration water in Cell
B which, while brought to field capacity the same as Cell E,
did not have the microbial seed to accelerate the biological
processes
No substantial change is evident in the gas composition
which remains with substantial percents of C02 (901+) and
-------
measurable CHi, (5*+). Although anaerobic, the cell environment
apparently is not yet sufficiently reducing to convert sulfate
to sulfide as is evidenced by increasing concentrations of SOij
(Figure 17). Even though the rate of production of leachate is
different between Cell E and Cells A and B, the rate of settle-
ment for these three cells is quite similar (Figure ^1). Cell
B was brought to field capacity prior to sealfng. Whereas Cell
E was brought close to field capacity, Cell A was not moisture
conditioned, but received relatively small quantities of rain-
water during construction of the cell.
The P and N nutrient levels (Figures 18-21) in Cell E
leachate indicate that neither nutrient can be considered
limiting by normal biological requ i reinen ts . Although the
specific nutrient requirements of the anaerobic microorganisms
existing in the cell are unknown, ft Is safe to say that the
nitrogen and phosphorus available In the leachate are at least
an order of magnitude above minimal requirements.
Heavy metal content of Cell E leachate (Table 13) follows
the same trend as for Cells A and B. Cd Is either just at or
below the detection limits of the analytical methods used and,
when detected, is above the USPHS Drinking Water Standards.
Cu is generally found at levels below 0.2 ppm, while Zn , Pb ,
and Hg tend to be at or above the 1962 USPHS Standards.
GROUNDWATER QUALITY
One of the major concerns about sanitary landfills is the
pollution potential of leachate and the possible contamination
of adjacent surface water and groundwater. The purpose of
monitoring the quality of groundwater in close proximity to the
test cells and down valley from the cells is to maintain a check
on the effectiveness of the earth cells in preventing leachate
from contaminating the underlying groundwater.
The data collected to date (Appendix H) indicate that the
quality of the groundwaters taken from test wells 1 through k
remain stable in terms of the parameters most likely to indicate
50
-------
pollution by leachate. The parameters most likely to indicate
the presence of leachate contamination are those relatively
conservative parameters (from the point of view of groundwater)
such as C1, Na, K, Ca, Mg , SO/,, and alkalinity. In addition,
gross measurements such as TDS and EC are also valuable
indicators of changes in composition. The data collected show
no significant shifts in composttion of the water in any of the
wells. The indications are that no contamination of the
surrounding groundwater aquifer has occurred to date. Therefore,
the clay liners are assumed to have maintained their integrity
at this point in tfme,, This conclusion is further supported
by data on the quality of water extracted from the sub-cell
lysimeters presented in Appendfx H.
GENERAL SUMMARY OF REFUSE STABILIZATION
The use of landfilling as a means of disposing of solid
wastes has been widely employed as an economical method of refuse
disposal, Typically, the organic and inorganic constituents of
the refuse are subject to microbia! and chemical degradation
and hence will leach as water percolates through the waste
materials. Unless contained, the leachate may enter groundwater
aquifers, surface streams, lakes or impoundments. Guidelines for
land disposal of solid wastes generally include recommendations
that the design consider potential leachate production and, thus,
include a system for protection of ground and surface waters.
The eventual appearance of leachate and gas problems at or near
most landfill sites emphasizes the need to understand the refuse
stabilization processes and the need to eventually control those
processes.
The production of leachate and gases from sanitary landfills
is a direct consequence of the unavoidable chemica1-bio1ogica1
activity which must occur in the refuse materials. The only
real question is one of the time dependency of major processes
extant in the landfill
5!
-------
The most important overall processes are those involving the
anaerobic microbial metabolism of the organic materials in the
fill refuse. It was the purpose of the study reported herein
to demonstrate methods by which stabilization of refuse compon-
ents might be accelerated by deliberate managed techniques.
It is useful to summarize here the general trends of sequences
of refuse stabilization. Although the exact definition of the
condition of a specific site and/or its pollution potential is
not possible here, it is possible to describe the stages of
stabilization on the basis of past experience with landfill
leachate and gas composition, as well as the available literature
information on anaerobic microbial decomposition processes.
A young site In a region of moderately heavy precipitation
will generally accumulate moisture until it reaches field capa-
city (unless otherwise treated). As the Initial anaerobic bio-
degradation processes occur the acid fermentation phase will
predominate yielding leachate with a low pH, high volatile acids,
considerable inorganic Ions (eg., Cl, S0j,~ , Ca+2, Mg + 2, Na+)
and a gas composition almost totally CO^.- This phase of
stabilization reflects the fact that anaerobic faiodegradation is
a two-stage process. In the first stage the bacteria grow by
utilizing anaerobic fermentation yielding organic solute products
composed mainly of volatile fatty acids. The extent of this
fermentation depends on the degree of anaerobiosis (degree to
which Q£ is excluded). In this stage pH generally falls (be-
cause of the volatile fatty acids as well as the high partial
pressure of 002) and CO-2 is the principal gaseous product. The
principal energy sources consist of solutes such as starch,
cellulose, hemicellulose and pectic residues, glycerol from
lipids (probably small amounts), and any available po1ysaccharides
and mucopo1ysaccharides. This fermentation is carried on by a
varied flora and typically produces a mixture of volatile fatty
acids, ethanol, C02 and H2. Lignin-type aromatic compounds are
probably not degraded to any extent anaerobica11y , since lignin
degradation is an aerobic process, although there is the possi-
bility of methanogenesis (in the second stage), as the aromatic
52
-------
ring in a benzoate can be degraded by methanogenic bacteria from
sewage.
All these processes are carried out by a mixed anaerobic
flora, many of them strfct anaerobes. There are also facultative
anaerobes present in varying numbers, and while these aid in the
breakdown of materials, they are, most importantly, responsible
for utilizing oxygen in solution, thus producing sufficiently
low reducing conditions so that strict anaerobes can grow.
Methane fermentation is the second stage of the overall anaerobic
process. The methanogenic bacteria are strict anaerobes and oxygen
at any detectable level is extremely toxfc to these organisms
and will inhibit their growth. in general, methanogenic bacteria
are slow-growing and have tight pH tolerances (6.6 - 7.M.
Methanogenic bacteria, like other organisms utilizing nutrients
of substrates whose avaflability is regulated by abiotic factors,
present a special situation in regard to ecological amplitude.
The availability of many soluble or insoluble nutrients^ both
organic and inorganic, changes as the level or intensity of these
factors is modified; for example, pH regulates the extent of
retention of numerous soluble nutrients while the redox potential
determines whether or not several inorganic nutrient elements
are in a form readily assimilated. These abiotic processes come
in addition to the physiological tolerances of the various
microbes themselves,
The nitrogen requirements of the methanoge"ic bacteria are
not completely known. It seems that they can use NH^ and possibly
some amino acids. The substrates for methane formation by different
species of methanogenic bacteria have been given as H2 + C02,
formic, acetic and butyric acids, ethanol and methanol. Hydrogen
and C02 and formate are definitely substrates, but all the possible
substrates for methanogenesis are probably present in leachates.
ii
Me t h anoge nesis is subject to substrate inhibition by high
levels of volatile fatty acids and since methane bacteria are
s1ow-growing , removal of volatile fatty acids by methane bacteria
is often the rate limiting step in the anaerobic digestion
process. Too rapid a primary fermentation results in accumula-
53
-------
tion of volatile fatty acids, the cessation of methane fermenta-
tion and a slow-down of the overall process. This was observed
by Mao and Pohland (1973) in the simulated landfill which was
seeded with sewage sludge and appears to have occurred in Cell
E in this study.
It is fair to say that leachate and gas composition reflect-
ing near neutral pH, low volatile acids, low total dissolved
solids and high CH^ content (50%) in the gas likely reflects
older landfill sites which have already undergone substantial
stabilization of the readily available organlcs in the refuse.
The composition of leachate and gas from Cell D at the present
time (June, 197*0 reflects such a situation.
Although the activities and very existence of a microbial
population are associated with a multitude of abiotic factors,
a range (maximum and mfnfrnum) Is usually established for each of
these factors. These are physiological limits beyond which the
microbial population Is unable to matntain itself or to perform
a vital function. For each factor an optimal level or range
can usually be established, in addition to an upper limit. Thus,
in a heterogeneous mixed media system such as is found in a land-
fill, it is to be expected that many environmental conditions
co-exist in different places, leading to the formation of different
microenvironments where quite different types of organisms
may grow. Therefore, it is not surprising to find methane pro-
duced in a landfill which appears to have a leachate pH of 5
(even though methanogenic organisms cannot exist at pH 5).
The reason this can occur is because there are pockets or regions
(microenvironments) in the landfill where conditions allow these '
organisms to survive.
The level of moisture content has an important role in pro-
moting refuse stabilization. It is not possible at this point
to quantitatively state what an absolute minimum moisture content
or optimum content might be, but generally speaking, the more
moisture, the better (A 1 exan de r, 1 9 7 1 ) . Old literature data
-------
(McKinney, 1962) suggests 60 percent moisture as a minimum,
but additional evidence is needed before a judgement can be made
for landfill situations.
Although the rate of biodegradatfon is affected by tempera-
ture, there is no possibility of controlling this parameter in
any practical manner and it is not discussed here.
Data from this study and that of Mao and Pohland (1973)
indicate that accelerated refuse stabilization occurs with recycled
leachate, and data' presented by Mao and Pohland show that arti-
ficial control of pH at near neutral values when recycling
leachate will further accelerate the stabilization process.
55
-------
CONCLUSIONS
1. Control Cell A shows ,time dependence of leachate and gas
composition consistent with general behavior of typical
sanitary landfills. This cell provides a comparative standard
basis for the other four managed cells.
2. Adding moisture to raise moisture content to field capacity
does accelerate stabilization processes to an observable
degree,as evidenced by early production of methane. Bringing
landfill materials to field capacfty immediately after
placement accelerates the development of leachate and
presumably enhances faiodegradation processes even though not
observed during the duration of thfs study in terms of leachate
quality. No increase in rate of settling of fill material
was observed resulting from the addition of moisture.
3. Continual flow-through of water accelerates stabilization of
refuse materials, flushes out soluble materials and increases
the rate of settlement of fill material. The inorganic
solutes and organic solutes are reduced at equivalent
rates. Early production of methane occurs in this mode of
operation. All measures of soluble leachate constituents
are significantly reduced.
k. Continual flow-through mode of operation does not appear to
be economically feasible due to the large quantity of leachate
wh i c-h would require handling.
5. Recircu1 ation of leachate through a landfill material signi-
ficantly increases the establishment of active anaerobic
microbial population within the fill. The recircu1 ation of
leachate increases the rate of biological stabilization of
the organic fraction of the refuse, as evidenced by large
reductions in BOD and COD.
6. The initial and secondary rates of surface settlement of
the landfill is greatly accelerated for the recycled
leachate mode of operation. The ultimate settlement of the
landfill is thereby achieved much quicker for the recycled
mode.
56
-------
7. Leachate recircu1 ation essentially uses the landfill volume
as a generally uncontrolled anaerobic digestor for effective
anaerobic treatment of its own leachate*
8. Significant advantages can be gained by leachate recircu!ation
in terms of leachate control, ultimate qua),sty control of
leachate and acceleration of time frame for alternate use
of landfill sites.
9. Seeding of placed refuse with septic tank pumpings without
additional management accelerates acid fermentation processes,
thereby increasing establishment of anaerobic mocrobial activ-
ity, but ultimately appears to suppress development of vigorous
methanogenic organisms, in the absence of pH control of
leachate and recycling of leachate, seeding cannot be
recommended as beneficial on the basis of this study.
10. Leachate recircuI ation is the most feasible and most
beneficial of the management procedures utilized In this
study with respect to rate of s tab ii I i zat ton of refuse,,
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY
Following are a series of suggestions which would yield
useful results and insights into specific areas of landfill
stabilization behavior,
1. Continue low level monitoring of leachate quality parameters
on all cells.
2. Initiate studies on the methodology of estimating and possibly
predicting active landfill life during which significant
amounts of pollutants are produced.
3. Utilize Cells A, B and D for studies on the rate of gas pro-
duction, feasibility of effective gas recovery by pumping
and estimating rate of gas diffusion through surface
coverings,
k. Initiate a study of refuse stabilization of Cell E by
means of leachate rec«rcu1 at ion with pH control„
57
-------
IX - REFERENCES
Alexander, M. Microbial Ecology. Wiley. 1971-
Anderson, J. R. and J. N. Dornbush. "Influence of sanitary land-
fill on groundwater quality". American Water Works Association
Journal . 59, *»57, 1967.
Apgar, M. A. and D. Langmuir. "Groundwater pollution potential
of a landfill above the water table". Groundwater, 9_, 76, 1971.
APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-
water, 19th ed, 1971 .
California, State of, Water Pollution Control Board. Final report
on the investigation of leaching from a sanitary landfill.
State Water Pollution Control Board Publ. No. 10, 1951*.
Fungaroli, A. A. "Laboratory study of the behavior of a sanitary
landfill". J. Water Pollution Control Federation, ^, 252, 1971.
Fungaroli, A. A. "Pollution of subsurface water by sanitary
landfills". Vol. 1, Report SW-12rg, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1971 .
Gelger, R. The cl [mate near the ground. Rev. ed. , Harvard Uni-
versity Press , i 965 .
Golueke, C. G. and P. H. HcGauhey. Comprehensive studies of
solid waste management, 1st and 2nd Annual Reports. Public
Health Service Publication No. 2039, 1970.
Hughes, G. M., R. A. Landon, and R. N. Farvolden. Hydrology
of solid waste disposal sites in Northeastern Illinois. Report
SW-l2d, Environmental Protection Agency, 1971.
Leckie, J. 0. and R. 0. James "Control mechanisms for trace
Petals in natural waters" in A. J. Rubin, ed. Aqueous-Envi ron-
JPental Chemistry of Hetals. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, \ n c ; . -
Leckie, J. 0. and W. Stumm. "Phosphate precipitation" in E. F.
Gloyna and W. W. Eckenfelder, eds. Advances in water quality
improvement - Physical and chemical processes , University of
Texas Press, 1970.
Mao, M. C-M. and F. G. Pohland. "Continuing investigations on
landfill stabilization with leachate rec i rcul at i on , neutraliza-
tion, and sludge seeding". Special Research Report, Georgia
Institute of Technology, School ofCivil Engineering. Sept., 1973
58
-------
McCarty, P. L. "Anaerobic treatment of soluble wastes". in
E. F. Gloyna and W. W. Eckenfelder, eds. Advances In Water
Quality Improvement, University of Texas Press,1968.
McCarty, P. L. "Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals"
Public Works. 95, No. 9-12, 196A.
McCarty, P. L. "Energetics of organfc matter degradation". W a t e r
Pollution Microbiology, R. Mitchell, ed.. I n te rs c i ence , 1972.
McKinney, R. D. Microbiology for Sanitary Engineers, McGraw-
Hill, 1962.
National Center for Resource Recovery, Inc., Municipal Solid
Waste: Its Volume, Composition and Value". NCRR Bulletin, III,
No, 2, k (1973).
Qasim, S. R. and J. C. "Leaching from simulated landfills".
Journal Water Pol 1 ut i on Con t ro T Federation, *»2, 361, 1970.
Riehl, H. Introduction to the atmosphere. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill,
1972.
Singer, I. A. and R. M. Brown. "The annual variations of sub-
soil temperatures about a 600-^foot circle". Trans. Amer. Geo-
physical Union, 37, 7^3, 1956.
Strahler, A. M. and A. J. Strahler. Environmental Geoscience.
Hamilton Publishing Co., 1973.
Strahler, A. M. The earth sciences, 2nd ed., Harper and Row,
1971.
......... v
Stumm, W. and J. J. Morgan. 'Aq'Ua't i c chemist r y, Wiley, 1970.
59
-------
TABLES
-------
TABLE 1
LIQUID CONDITIONING AND PURPOSE OF CELLS
CELL
DESIGNATION
A
B
C
D
E
INITIAL
L 1 QU 1 D
CONDITIONING
None
Field A
Capaci ty
None
None
Field ^
Capacity
L 1 QU 1 D
USED
None
Water
None
None
Septic
Tank
Pump ings
OPERATION
DAILY
LIQUID
APPLICATION
gal /day
None
None
700±
(200-1 000) **
1000±
(500-1000)**
None
LIQUID
USED
None
None
Water
Reci rcu-
lated
Leachate
None
PURPOSE OF CELL
Control Cell
To determine the effect of high initial
water content on refuse stabilization.
To determine the effect of continuous
water through flow on leachate character.
To determine the effect of continuous leachate
reclrculation on leachate character.
To determine the effect of high Initial
moisture content, using septic tank pump Ings,
on refuse stabilization.
o
N>
I
ov1
* Field capacity is the condition when a sufficient quantity of fluid has been added to the refuse
to cause a significant volume of leachate to be produced from the cell.
** Range of variation in daily application of fluid.
-------
TABU I
SUMMARY OF TYPICAL RANGES FOR VARIOUS LEACHATE PARAMETERS
PARAMETER
dng/1 unla».
othanrla* notec
AodtcAcld
Acidity
Alkalinity
Alttmnum
Araanlo
Barium
Batrllum
BOD
rWmlda
Butyric Acid
Cadmium
Calcium
Chloride
Chromium
COD
Copmer
Cyanide
riuotlde
LABORATORY STUDIES
1) CALIFORNIA W. VIRGINIA DREXEL GEORGIA TECH
0) C) (3) (4)
4,000-8,000
500-3,000 1,500-3,300
730-9,500 8.000-U.OOO 1,000-1,500
81-33,100 9,000-30,000 40-110
500-4, 500
HSr2,S70 600-3,000
»«-t,350 500-2,000 200-2,000 100-350
1, 000-40, OM 6,000-18,000
1-4.5
HanJne.l, Total (a.CaOOJ) 650-8,120 S, 000-12, 000 1,000-5,000 1,000-5,000
HBAS
Hrane Soluble.
1'Ofi, Farroue
m. Total
•ad
•lagne.lum
Manganaaa
rllokel
Hruooen, Total
Mltrogan, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Nitrogen, Oraanle
Featlcldaf (ppbl
•H
Pnoaphat*
Petaaatum
fraolanlc Add
Sejetilnm •
Sodium
Solid., Total
Sotlda, Uliaolvad
Solid., Suspended
Solid., Volatile
Sulphate
Tannin and Llardn
TOO
Valeric «old
2.0-93
6.5-305 100-800 100-1,400 0.02-24.0
64-410 100-400
0.05-1.66
0.01-0.9
400-2,000 30-400
i 0.22-890 300-1,000 JO-250
2.4-550 200-1,000 8-460 50-150
100-800
5.6-7.6 5.3-6.3 5.0-1.0 7.0
0.16-29 20-120 1-130 1.0-7.0
18-1,860 700-3, 500
2,000-5,000
85-1,805 300-1,200 200-3,800 '
18,000-50,000 5,000-40,000
5,000-25,000
10,000-28,000
39-730 200-800 50-400
300-1,000
3,000-5,000
30-1,800
Volatile .-\ctds, 'otal
Zlno
REFERENCES: 0)
0)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7;
1-120
State of California '1954'
Quaalm and Uurchlnal 0970)
Funaarell (1971!
Mao and Pohland 11973)
State of California H9S4)
Andaraon and !>orahu*h (1986)
Hughea, et. al. (1971)
FULD STUpHS THIS STUDY
CALIFORNIA S. DAKOTA ILLINOIS CELL A CELL C
(5) (6) (7)
255-1,125 24] 100-10,000 1, 000-8, 500 1,000-5,500
0.05-1.1
0.1-6.9
0.11-8.5
0.1
0.6-59 50-50,000 12,000-31,000 4,000-28,000
0.1-12
0.05
88-355 100-300 500-2,500 400-1,600
72-865 1.84 15-1,500 500-2,000 200-2,000
O.OS-0.2
10-50,000 15,000-55.000 4,000-40,000
0.05 0.15-0.7 0.02-0.6
0.005-0.024
0.05-0.89
305-1,175 301 lOft-10,000
0.01-0.5
0-350
0-4.0
0.07 0.2-5,000 700-1,100 tOO-300
0.5-1.3 0.1-1.8 0.1-0. 8
13-110 11-300 600-1,100 100-1,000
2.4-6.5
0.12-8.5 40-700 100-800
9.8 0.1-1,5 O.i-1 0.1-1
0-2.3 5-100 ' 10-900
5
6.85-7.78 7.31 6.5-8.5 4.5-5.2 4.4-5.3
0.01-1.6 0.5-7.0 . 1-15 1-40
4.4-190 0.16 t-790 200-900 70-800
0.1-2.7
67-710 10.2 50-1,200 80-900 100-950
200-13,000 12,000-26,000 3,000-20,000
25-700 25-800 150-800 100-800
10,000-19,000 3,000-12,000
0.05-40 0.2-60 0.6-42
CELL P
2,000-8,000
400-13,000
500-1,600
1,000-2,000
1,000-38,000
0.04-0.15
62-300
0.01-2.0
100-700
200-900
0,1-9
10-900
4.5-6.8
1-40
300-100
600-1,000
1,000-2?, 000
100-900
1,000-14,000
1.1!- 95
Reproduced from
best available copy
-------
TABLE 3
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT SUMMARY
ITEM
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic, Rubber,
etc.
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Dirt, Rock
Fines
TOTAL
Random Sample
Combined Waste
A
LU
_l
00
<
_l
-------
TABLE 4
REFUSE COMPOSITION SUMMARY
ITEM
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic* Rubber,
etc.
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Rock, Dirt
Fines
TOTAL
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEIGHT
CELL
A
8.8
10.8
35.5
4.2
1.1
1.3
8.0
9.1
5.8
15.1*
100.0
B
10.4
11. 1
44.5
5.2
1.4
1.2
9.9
9.8
1.0
5.5
100.0
C
12.8
5.8
42.4
5.1
2-5
0.6
8.8
11.5
3.6
6.9
100.0
D
9.7
7.4
45.3
it. 7
1.5
1.3
9.5
12.1*
1.0
7.2
100.0
E
12.0
17.0
35.2
4.0
1.9
o.4
8.6
11.5
2.8
6.5
100.0
Average of
All Cells
10.7
10. 4
40.6
4.6
V-7
1.0
9.0
10.9
2.8
8.3
100.0
Project 102-1.3
64
-------
TABLE 5
COMPOSITION OF REFUSE
^NV SOURCE OF
\^ REFUSE
ITEM ^v
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic, Rubber,
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Dirt, Rock
Fines
TOTAL
WEIGHT PERCENTAGE
SONOMA COUNTY
TEST CELLS
CALIFORNIA
10.7
10. k
1»0.6
i».6
1.7
1.0
9.0
10.9
2.8
8.3
100.0
'SANTA CLARA
COUNTY (a)
CALIFORNIAV
12.0
9.0
50.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
7.0
7.0
100.0
CITY OF
BERKELEY (b)
CALIFORNIA
25.1
kk.S
2.2
1.1
-
8.7
11.3
7.1
100.0
DR. POHLAND
GA.INST. OF
TECH. -GEORGIA
25.0
0
50.0
3.0
5.0
1.0
*KO
7.0
5.0
0
100.0
(a) Estimated breakdown of domestic waste. Assumes a per capita
production of 8 pounds per day of which kk% is domestic refuse.
(b) Refuse segregated and weighed at Berkeley Waste Disposal Site.
Percentage figures are average of seven loads from districts
established by Income level and type of dwelling unit.
* Reference: "Comprehensive Studies of Solid Waste Management"
First and Second Annual Reports. C. G. Golueke &
P. H. McGauhey. Public Health Service Pub. No. 2039, 1970.
** "Landfill Stabilization with Leachate Recycle"
Frederick G. Pohland, 3rd Annual Environmental Engineering
& Science Conference, March 5-6, 1973, Louisville, KY.
Project 102-1.3
65
-------
TABLE 6
CELL C.LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
6-20-72
7™11"72
7-25-72
8-8-72
8-23-72
9-7-72
9-20-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
11-30-72
12-19-72
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.01
2.10
2.25
2.53
2.11
2.22
2.53
2.53
2.38
2.78
3.08
1.70
K89
2.61
2.69
1.76
1.97
3.01
3-33
3.65
2.56
3.41
2.84
BOD
0.45
0.42
0.37
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.55
0.52
0.41
0.56
0.54
0.42
0.71
0.54
0.66
0.60
0.66
0.57
0.70
0.38
0.38
0.54
0.38
CALCIUM
9.17
9.17
6.25
11.36
10.00
7-50
9.50
11.22
11.08
9.52
11.43
10.42
12.00
11.59
11.48
10.53
10.70
12.73
12.00
8.93
8.04
11.54
9.32
COD
0.33
0.28
0.31
0.41
0.33
0.32
0.39
0.41
0.40
0.49
0.39
0.32
0.43
0.41
0.41
0.37
0.40
0.42
0.43
0.32
0.28
0.43
0.34
CHLORIDE
9.17
9.82
9-09
11.79
9-90
10.23
11.05
13.58
13-17
17-54
15.09
15-63
17-56
16.98
16.67
18.58
11.30
14.74
19.46
7.69
14.52
21.13
10.04
MAGNESIUM
14.47
22.00
18.18
30.49
22.22
20.00
21.11
27-50
44.32
45.45
40.00
34.09
37-50
28.63
36.08
37.97
41.22
36.36
40.00
30.12
14,06
41.10
-
POTASSIUM
-
-
11.83
-
-
10.75
-
14.67
-
17.86
-
15.63
18.95
15-87
-
17-65
-
21.54
20.00
14.71
16.67
22.22
17-50
SODIUM
-
-
10.53
-
-
12.86
-
13-75
-
18.18
-
15.76
15-38
19.21
-
19-23
-
16.67
12.68
14.71
13.64
18.75
16.67
SULPHATE
-
12.50
-
15.24
-
20.09
-
24.55
-
29.41
-
-
- •
-
-
45.80
-
-
-
-
-
52.63
-
TDS
0.72
0.57
0.54
0.69
0.61
0.67
0.79
0.91
0.79
0.99
0.87
0.80
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.88
0.85
0.84
0.91
0.73
0.69
0.98
0.80
-------
TABLE 6 cont'd
CELL C LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVI TV/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-2*1-73
5-15-73
6-5-73
6-26-73
7-17-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
.11-20-73
12-11-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.81
2.68
1.53
2.24
2.30
1.40
0.95
1.43
1.51
1.63
1.30
1.19
2.33
1.69
1.50
1.06
1-93
1.47
0.57
0.73
0.59
0.90
2.02
BOD
0.51
0.40
0.28
0.34
0.50
0.23
0.17
0.21
0.30
0.35
0.25
0.19
0.41
0.27
0.25
. 0.25
0.39
0.28
0.26
0.49
0.17
0.44
-
CALCIUM
9.95
8.75
6.04
6.06
7-93
5.18
3.12
4.87
4.93
5.76
5.69
5.45
7.93
6.38
5.24
5.00
6.75
5.50
4.67
4.98
2.49
7.61
12.45
COD
0.41
0.32
0.24
0.26
0.34
0.22
0.13
0.18
0.20
0.24
0.21
0.19
0.33
0.23
0.22
0.21
0.29
0.21
0.19
0.24
0.12
0.30
-
CHLORIDE
18.97
19-09
5.51
8.15
18.59
7-51
7.32
6.44
7.48
7.06
12.35
10.67
26.42
14.29
16.80
14.40
20.77
4.74
1.07
3-39
1.37
1.13
15.31
MAGNESIUM
46.61^
17-50
25-00
23.40
37.76
21.15
13.89
19.90
21.59
26.66
23.84
18.82
35.00
24.44
27-63
22.50
32.93
20.00
21.43
24.39
12.78
27.16
27.27
POTASSIUM
26.70
18.83
13.30
16.50
22.24
13.33
7.89
12.34
14.84
-
16.66
17-86
25.45
-
19.09
-
34.62
15.38
6.67
-
9.49
-
39.47
SODIUM
22.00
13.82
11.15
12.13
15.90
9-32
5-95
8.55
7.42
-
9-07
7.17
12.73
-
12.65
-
15-00
-
8.15
-
6.71 .
-
19-48
SULPHATE
-
-
-
-
30.72
-
-
-
33.93
-
32.54
-
_
-
29.17
-
-
-
11.36
-
-
-
-
TDS
0.88
0.81
0.55
0.61
0.79
0.48
0.30
0.41
0.46
0.56
0.49
0.42
0.62
0.48
0.56
0.50
0.72
0.46
0.42
0.52
0.34
0.71
1.06
-------
TABLE 6 cont'd
CELL C LEACHATE
ELECTROHTONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RAT I OS
DATE
3-28-74
4-17-74
Peiii6d ;:
...AvfeVafes „•
•*T -n jfci ' ' " -
m-& to
M?3i to
ffiSfc*.
J52M13
•piptTto"
4-442—
V2F73 to
8-7-73
terav
I-4-7* to
4- 17-74
Data Point!
Mean
Std. Dev.
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
0.89
2.61
'
'. --!: ''-
• .. '•'' '
2.10
2.50
•••Cj*2;.J2-r
3..10*
1.85
1.57
1.37
1.29
48
2.03
±0.76
BOO
-
0.73
'^''" - .
0.^3-%.
0.50
0.62
1K48 "
0.32
0.29
0.28
0.46
46
0.42
±0.15
CALCIUM
12.14
10.63
.i--*:** " ' '
, a.9i
10.53
•;ir.5i----
. 9-96".
6.18
5.77
5.59
8.38
too
-
0.43
. • •
CHLORIDE
17-35
4.35 .
e
MAGNESIUM
19.43
41.72
POTASSIUM
-
45.33
, STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF DATA
Mean. V aides for 18-Week Time Periods
.... - •£••-•• * _ -;.. /*"••; % . J
0.33 .
1-; o^4o"
0.-4l-^
0.37 . .,.
0.25 "
0.23
0.23
0.27
JO. 00 '-'
«^-3«b.«
^15,97 •
,15.30
"fi.03:
11.74
11.97
7-15
i 2^23
35.41
^34.29-
1 34^8 ';
25>12
24 . 30
24.83
25.46
11.29
16.05
I8.m.
19.63
15-35
17-45
18.94
31.43
SODIUM
-
26.15
11. 70^
1.5.90 =
17.62,
• 16.41
11.38
8.99
11.93
17.45
Mean Values and Standard Deviations for Total Study Period
48
8.35
±2.79
46
0.31
±0.09
48
12.19
±5.83
47
27.99
±9-33
33
18.54
±8.26
32
13.79
±4.78
SULPHATE
16.75
15.94
26.98
.45.80
52.63
30.72
33-19
20.27
16.75
13
27.28
±12.46
TDS
0.96
1.07
0.63.
0.86
0.9J
0 . 83 -
0.59
0.49
0.52
0.78
48
0.70
±0.20
OS
oo
-------
TABLE 7
CELL D LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
6-20-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
8-23-72
9-7-72
9-20-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
11-30-72
12-13-72
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
3-93
2.47
1.88
2.02
1.98
2.02
1.91
2.27
2.18
2.24
2.83
2.00
1.90
1.88
2.53
1.65
1.75
-
3.44
2.04
1.96
2.55
2.31
800
0.59
0.53
0.41
' 0.50
0.44
0.46
0.45
0.54
0.36
0.42
0.39
0.50
0.61
0.60
0.71
0.60
0.62
0.54
0.62
0.39
0.36
0.44
0.37
CALCIUM
7.69
8.46
6.43
10.00
7-69
11.11
9.00
12.50
9-38
7.22
10.62
9-85
10.59
10.07
10.86
9.42
9-79
9.99
11.23
7.52 _^
6.25
8.86
6.95
COD
0.13
0.42
0.30
0.40
0.31
0.31
0.29
0.37
0.34
0.38
0.38
0.37
0.41
0.51
0.44
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.44
0.30
0.26
0.35
0.36
CHLORIDE
9.92
10.68
9.18
11.76
9.80
10.87
8.82
11.47
11.19
12.38
11.59
12.62
14.02
13-43
14.21
12.04
11.20
12.08
12.92
9.09
5.92
7.69
6.23
MAGNESIUM
21.43
22.00
18.00
26.67
20.00
16.67
16.36
25.00
33.8?
30.95
30.36
26.00
22.87
28.43
28.41
26.26
25-69
24.65
30.51
17.86
14.29
20.69
-
POTASSIUM
13.19
-
12.16
-
-
13.75
-
17-19
-
17.10
-
16.25
18.07
18.59
-
17.57
-
18.67
19.38
13.16
12.33
17.39
16.70
SODIUM
12.24
-
10.00
-
-
11.63
-
12.25
-
13.68
-
14.77
15.89
14.36
-
14.64
-
14.58
15-35
10.99
11.25
13.64
11.50
SULPHATE
-
10.58
-
13.04 y
-
12.59
-
13-59
-
14.32
.
-
-
-
-
21.67
-
-
-
-
-
25-70
-
TDS
0.57
0.77
0.55
0.75
0.59
0.62
0.59
0.77
0.68
0.89
0.73
0.61
0.81
0.77
0.74
0.69
0.69
0.72
0.91
0.59
0.52
0.69
0.65
-------
TABLE 7 cont'd
CELL D LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-5-73
6-26-73
7-17-73
8-7-73
4-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-11-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.78
2.04
1.46
-
1.42
1.10
1.36
\.22
1.06
1.43
1.27
1.13
1.43
1.56
0.89
0.93
1.95
1.43
0.88
0.82
0.39
1.58
2.26
BOO
0.47
0.33
0.37
' 0.33
0.34
0.28
0.25
0.25
0.30
0.38
0.36
0.26
0.54
0.59
0.47
0.95
2.71
1.88
2.10
2.31
1.50
6.36
6.67
CALCIUM
8.59
8.94
12.03
5.30
5.00
4.33
4.33
3.75
3-94
5.55
5-92
6.23
8.61
11.61
7.00
8.75
16.12
9.36
7-31
6.79
3-73
17-81
22.16
COD
0.41
0.28
0.21
0.23
0.24
0.20
0.21
0.21
0.19
0.26
0.26
-
0.40
0.56
0.47
0.77
1.81
1.01
1.24
1.28
1.13
5.18
6.59
CHLORIDE
10.43
8.10
5.98
5-71
5.30
4.35
5-38
5.17
3.31
3.83
4.89
4.94
5.71
6.75
4.09
4.36
8.94
6.65
2.05
3.01
1.14
2.93
4.08
MAGNESIUM
21.88
15.58
11.72
11.00
18.04
9.80
10.79
9.93
7.14
11.36
17.72
9.51
13-27
15.65
9.85
11.41
23-33
17.86
12.75
9.46
4.66
26.52
29.20
POTASSIUM
18.67
11.62
9.12
10.94
11.48
8.82
9.84
9.38
17.14
-
21.54
11.33
11.76
-
7-65
-
19.76
13-95
10.73
-
3.80
-
22.73
SODIUM
14.05
9.60
7.27
7-38
7.88
6.64
6.82
7.00
, 5.45
-
13.73
6.51
7.65
-
5.54
- -
10.91
-
6.57
-
2.33
-
14.55
SULPHATE
-
-
-
-
15.91
-
-
-
15.19
-
21.79
• -
. -
-
47.56
-
-
-
36.07
-
-
-
-
TDS
0.72
0.52
0.40
0.43
0.41
0.34
0.35
0.35
0.31
0.40
0.38
0.37
0.49
0.63
0.77
0.55
1.24
0.77
0.68
0.55
0.30
1.36
1.71
-•J
o
-------
TABLE 7 cont'd
CELL D LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
3-28-74
4-17-74
Period
Averages
qpg to
mil to
7-25-72 to
10-11-7?
°7fe?2t°
tfcH <°
4=24-73 to
8-7-73
8-29-73 to
12-T1-7T
J -4- 74 to
4-17-74
Data Points
Mean
Std. Dev.
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.90
2.30
2.38
2.24
2.53
2.51
1.48
1.26
1.27
1.71
46
1.86
. ±0.70
BOO
15.58
23.66
0.49
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.32
0.35
1.45
9-35
38*
0.45*
±0.12*
CALCIUM
16.49
-
8.56
9.76
8.23
8.23
6.66
5.67
10.03
13.40
COD
7-89
9.47
CHLORIDE
-
7.67
MAGNESIUM
18.79
20.00
POTASSIUM
-
22.52
STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF DATA
Mean Values for 18-Week Time Periods
0.31
0.36
0.42
0.35
0.23
0.26
0.98
5.26
10.37
11.35
12.83
8.71
5.80
4.64
5.47
3.77
20.80
27.10
26.05
21.05
12.82
11.49
15.14
18.11
13-03
16.85
18.23
16.27
10.30
14.23
13.02
16.35
SODIUM
-
12.50
11.29
12.52
14.87
12.79
7.60
8.07
7.67
9-73
Mean Values and Standard Deviations for Total Study Period
47
8.96
±3.71
37*
*
0.31
±0.10
47
7.qq
±3-58
48
20.01
±10.08
34
14.54
±4.58
33
10.58
±3.61
SULPHATE
-
12.91
12.07
13.50
21.67
25.70
15.91
18.49
41.82
12.91
13
20.07
±10.85
TDS
1.29
1.63
0.64
0.71
0.74
0.68
0.41
0.38
0.77
1.14
48
0.68
±0.31
* Data from 10/9/73 on is not included in calculation of mean and standard deviation.
-------
TABLE 8
COMPANION THERMISTOR COMPARISON
DATE
12-2-71
12-3-71
12-6-71
12-7-71
12-8-71
12-9-71
12-10-71
12-14-71
12-15-71
12-16-71
12-17-71
12-20-71
12-28-71
12-29-71
1-27-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
TEMPERATURE - ° C
Thermistor Inside
Top Gas Probe
Cell B
22.2
21.0
20.9
21.7
21.7
22.7
22.6
25.6
21.3
21.3
21.2
20.9 *
20.0
19.8
17,2
15.9
16.9
17.5
17.5
17.6
18.8
20.0
21.1
Thermistor Outside
Top Gas Probe
Cell B
22.2
21.1
20.8
21.7
21.8
22.7
22.6
25.6
21.2
21.1
21.0
20.9
20.1
20.1
16.7
15.6
16.8
17.4
17.4
17-5
18.7
20.0
21.1
Project 102-1.3
72
-------
TABLE 9
-o
o
1 — .
o
~ ITEM
o
i 1 . Experimental
setup.
V"°
2. Fill used.
3. Depth of
refuse.
U>
k. Total water
appl ied.
5. Total leachate
produced.
6. Duration of
study.
7. Number of
samples
analyzed.
8. Controlled
parameter.
9. Reference
LEACHATE LABORATORY STUDIES
CALIFORNIA STUDIES
Wooden bin (8x^x12')
used at landf il 1 site
and covered with soil.
Fresh domestic rubbish
excluding cans, bottles
cardboard boxes and
large pieces of miscel-
laneous material .
10 feet
18.7 inches
6.2 inches (k\Q gal.)
216 days
35
Appl ied water.
State of Cal ifornia
(1952).
W. VIRGINIA STUDIES DREXEL STUDIES GEORGIA TECH STUDIES
Concrete cylinders Laboratory lysimeter: Corrugated steel pipe
3 feet in diameter. 6x6xlA feet. 36 inches in diameter,
Height: A. *» feet 1A feet in height.
B. 8 feet
C. 12 feet
Municipal refuse ex- Municipal refuse. Simulated municipal
eluding metals, cans, refuse.
bottles, stones and
large pieces of wood.
A. 3.6 feet/. . .. 8 feet 10 feet
B. 7.6 feet(lnc1ud'"9
C. 11.6 feet covers)
70 inches
A. 37-33 inches
B. 31.32 inches
C. 20.36 inches
163 days 700 days 600 days
16
Applied water - fill Applied water.
depth.
Qasim and Burchinal Fungaroli (1971 a,b). Mao and Pohland (1973).
(1970).
-------
TABLE 10
LEACHATE FIELD STUDIES
n
o
o
M
I
1.
2.
3.
k.
5.
6.
7,-
8.
ITEM
Location of
landfill.
Type of fill
material.
Age of fjll
at end of
study.
:•...-
Mode of
col lection.
Duration of
study.
Frequency of
sampling.
In contact
with water
table?
Reference
CALIFORNIA STUDJES S. DAKOTA STUDIES PENNSYLVANIA STUDIES ILLINOIS STUDIES
Riverside, California. Brookings, S. Dakota. Centre County, Pennsyl- 1.
van! a. 2.
3-
k.
5.
Domestic and commercial Municipal refuse. Municipal refuse. 1.
refuse. Combustible material 2.
burned before filling. 3-
••••••• 4.
5.
k years 6 years 9 years 1 .
' '' .••-.-- ' 2.
3-
IK
5.
Wells Wells Suction lysi meters
2 years 6 months k years
12 samples/2 years 3~k weeks Monthly and bimonthly
Yes Y3es No
DuPage County
Winnetha
Elgin
Woodstock
Blackwell Forest Pr.
Municipal
Municipal
1*0% Mun., 60% Ind.
kO% Mun., 60% Ind.
Municipal
12 years
23 years
22 years
30 years
5 years
Wells
k years
1. No
2. Yes
3. No
k. Yes
5. Undetermined
State of California Andersen & Dornbush Apgar 6 Langmuir (1971). Hughes, et.al. (1971).
(195*0. (1966).
-------
TABLE 11
SOLUTION ANALYSIS
Silty Sand
Determination - mg/1
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sod i urn
PH
Time After Immersion
1 week
170
30
500
30
3-5
31
7.2
6 months
170
3^
500
23
1.85
32
7.7
1 year
168
48
600
29
17.0
34
8.8
2 years
133
32
450
13.3
16
28
-
Concrete Sand
Determination - mg/1
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
PH
Time After Immersion
1 week
170
28
500
31
2.2
31
7.2
6 months
170
36
500
23
1.75
31.6
7.9
1 year
168
32
500
28
1.8
32
8.7
2 years
51
6.4
220
1.9
1.1
34
-
Pea Gravel
Determination - mg/1
Alkal inity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sod i urn
PH
Time After Immersion
1 week
180
33
480
26
1.9
31
7-3
6 months
190
54
550
16
1.95
29.6
7-3
1 year
190
40
460
25
2.0
31
9.2
2 years
133
38.5
310
12
1.2
30
—
Project 102-1.3
75
PLATE H-22A
-------
TABLE 12
WEIGHT, DENSITY, AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF REFUSE
PLACED IN TEST CELLS BEFORE MOISTURE ADDED
Test Cell Refuse Placed
A 530.35
B 521*. 23
c 521.72
D 530.97
E 521.93
Density After Original
Compaction Moisture Content
lb./yd.3 % wet wt.
1064
1052
1064
1065
1047
WEIGHT, DENSITY, AND MOI
PLACED IN
Total Weight of
Water Per Unit
Volume After
Test Cell Moisture Added
Ib./yd.-*
B 630.43
E 1*73.77
TEST CELLS
28.4
27-3
25.6
22.7
23.5
STURE CONTENT OF REFUSE
AFTER MOISTURE ADDED
Total1 Weight Percent Water
Per yd. ^ After After Moisture
, Moisture Added Added
1395
1274
.23 45.18
.72 - 37.17
Weight of Water
lb./yd.3
302.18
287.20
272.38
241.76
246.05
Differential
Percent Due to
Moisture Added
+17.88
•H3.67
Project 102-1.3
76
-------
TABLE 13
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELLS A, B, & E
CELL A
Date
2-15-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
11-21-72
4-10-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-22-74
3-6-74
4-17-74
CELL B
1-3-72
10-24-72
3-13-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-22-74
3-6-74
4-17-74
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
ND
ND
0.16
0.15
0.22
0.60
0.27
0.46
1.08
0.668
3.6
0.29
0.18
0.14
0.15
0.18
0.205
0.116
Zn
2.1
0.23
0.58
9-0
3.0
78.0
64.0
57.0
32.0
60.0
140.0
62.0
10.8
73.0
73-0
61.0
80.0
63.0
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.05
< 0.05
0.072
0.044
0.057
ND
0.19
ND
0.09
0.08
0.073
0.049
0.065
Hg
0.0006
0.0034
0.0078
0.0124
0.0014
0.0092
0
0.045
<0.001
0.021
0.006
0.0056
0.0044
0
0
0.075
•C0.001
0.016
Pb
ND
0.16
0.12
0.44
1.81
0.86
1.0
0.33
0.27
0.408
3.0
0.95
0.33
0.86
1.0
0.45
0.27
0.488
ND - Not detected
Project 102-1 .3
77
-------
TABLE 13 -Continued
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELLS A, B, £ E
CELL E
Date
2-15-72
10-24-72
1-23-73
3-13-73
4-24-73
6-5-73
6-26-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-22-74
3-6-74
4-17-74
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
ND
0.12
0.10
0.19
0.32
0.10
0.10
-
-
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.22
0.09
0.17
0.372
Zn
ND
1.67
41.0
5.6
64.0
58.0
61.0
32.5
-
62.0
68 .,0
18.0
18.5
70.8
109.0
50.0
Cd
-
0.09
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
*0.05
CO. 05
-
*b.i
<:o.o5
*o. 05
0.07
0.073
0.070
0.068
Hg
0.0005
0.0172
0.0144
0.010
0.006
-
0.0174
-
-
0.0084
0.0144
0.07
0.05
< 0.001
0.024
Pb
N
0.60
0.60
0.45
0.21
0.42
0.73
0.69
-
0.54
£0.2
0.65
1 .0
0.38
0.62
0.50
ND - Not detected
- No analysis made
Project 102-1.3
78
-------
TABLE 1*
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELL C
Date
3-2-72
4-11-72
5-9-72
6-6-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
0.6
ND
ND
0.15
0.15
0.18
0.13
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.11
0.1
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.02
Zn
42.0
30.0
30.0
22.0
13.0
10.0
9.5
7.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
8.0
4.6
4.5
4.3
2.8
3-5
3.8
2.5
0.6
Cd
ND
ND
ND
0.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.06
0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
0.05
<0.05
Hg
0.0014
0.0016
0.015
0.0102
0.0005
-
0.0175
0.0068
0.005
-
0.0034
-
0.0076
0.0209
0.0071
-
0.0038
0.0084
0.0048
0.0002
Pb
ND
ND
ND
0.8
ND
0.1
0.2
0.22
0.15
0.35
0.15
0.17
ND
ND
0.1
-
0.1
0.1
ND
Tr.
Project 102-1.3
79
-------
TABLE 14 - Continued
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELL C
Date
7-17-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-11-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74
3-28-74
4-17-74
5-7-74
5-28-74
Cu
0.05
0.04
-
0.11
0.23
0.15
0.18
0.08 :
. -
0.04
-
0.10
-
0.036
-
-
Zn
0.72
0.8
-
0.7
-
0.6
1.8
0;6
-
1.7
-
0.33
-
0.5
- .
-
Cd
<0.05
<0.05
-
<0.05
<0.05
4.0.05
0.05
0
-
0.01
• •.•
0.013
-
< 0.006
-
-
Hg
-
0
-
-
-
0
0
0
- •
0.01
.
0.001
-
0.006
-
-
Pb
40.1
0
-
0.2
0
^0.2
0.24
0
-
0.07
.
<-0.01
-
0.096
-
-
Project 102-1.3
80
-------
TABLE 15
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELL D
ELEMENT - mg/1
DATE
1-18-72
3-2-72
4-11-72
5-9-72
4
6-6-72 .
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
Cu
0.4
ND
ND
ND
0.1
0.15
0.16
0.14
0.15
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.32
0.29
0.08
0.11
0.12
0.09
0.12
0.08
0.06
0.01*
0.08
Zn
95.0
40.0
40.0
30.0
30.0
28.0
28.0
-
21.5
29-5
28.5
27.5
25.0
21.0
22.5
17.8
17.6
16.9
17.5
14.0
15.0
12.0
8.5
Cd
0.1
ND
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.16
0.09
0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
0.05
<0.05
Hg
0.003
0.0058
0.0028
0.0066
0.0052
0.0045
-
0.0095
0.005
0.005
-
0.0008
-
0.011
0.0156
0.0076
0.0209
0.0084
0.0016
0.002
0.0016
0.0022
0
Pb
2.0
ND
1.0
ND
0.5
0.18
0.35
0.64
0.36
0.59
0.47
0.32
0.37
0.43
0.40
0.23
0.46
0.24
-
0.1
0.5
ND
0.31
ND - Not detected
- No analys i s made
Project 102-1.3
81
-------
TABLE 15 - Continued
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELL D
ELEMENT - mg/1
DATE
7-17-73
8-7-73
8-29-73
9-18-73
10-9-73
10-30-73
11-20-73
12-13-73
1-4-74
1-22-74
2-12-74
3-6-74
3-28-74
4-17-74
5-7-74
5-28-74
Cu
0.08
0.05
-
0.09
-
0.12
0.28
0.08
-
0.03
.
0.045
-
0.055
-
-
Zn
17.5
3-5
-
4.5
-
3.0
3.2
2.4
-
1.6
-
•
-
1.12
-
-
Cd
*0.05
40.05
-
40.05
*0.05
•CO. 05
*.0.05
0
-
0.012
-
0.005
'-
0.017
-
-
Hg
.
0
-
-
-
0
0.004
0.0036
-
0.015
-
0.0011
-
0.041
-
-
Pb
<0.1
0.37
-
0.20
-
<0.2
0.24
0.53
-
0.13
-
<0.01
-
40.01
-
-
No analysis made
Project 102-1.3
-------
FIGURES
-------
MENDOCINO COUNTY
SONOMA
X NAPA COUNTY
COUNTY
CENTRAL
DISPOSAL
SITE
Q PETALUMA
LEGEND
CENTRAL SERVICE AREA
LOCATION MAP
(8- 71)
FIGURE 1
-------
GNM
Date.
1-72
.Checked By.
Project M..mK«, 102-1.3 ri;«nt Sonoma County
Sonoma County. Catlfornh
LEGEND
Spring
Landslide
Merced Formation
KJf Franciscan Formation
SCALE
GEOLOGIC MAPf CENTRAL DISPOSAL SITE
-------
oo
*
01
Trench Location
Scale 1-70
EXPLORATION MAP
FIGURE 3
-------
Original Topograpfcy
Field Density Mtarminition
FIELD DENSITY TEST LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 4
-------
00
00
-------
I 1/2" 01 A. RV.C. PIPE
1/2" PERFORATED
PVC. PIPE
SLOT
DISTRIBUTION PIPE DETAIL
NO SCALE
oo
4 SUBORAIN
PEA GRAVEL"
SAND
SETTLEMENT MONUMENT
JL i-'fAo'' t-'»
> NATIVE CLAY
DISTRIBUTION PO»E
—
A '.':';• *,t> DISTRIBUTION MEDIUM
'
..7
*
Ctli;c> Sandy
C«ll 0« P»« Grovel
CELL'C'a'D' COVER DETAIL
NO SCALE
2" DISTRIBUTION
MANIFOLD
CELL 'D'
4"5UBORAW
DETAIL OF LEACHATE COLLECTION PIPE
NO SCALE
SECTION'A-A1- TEST CELL SITE PLAN (AS BUILT)
60 80
SCALE IN FEET
COUNTY OF SONOMA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DONALD B. HEAD, DIRECTOR
SECTION 'A-A1 , TEST CELL SITE
PLAN (AS BUILT)
JULY 1972
SCALE AS SHOWN
FIGURE 6
-------
Tt»t Ctll Access Road
1,000 Gal. Leochate
I Distribution Tank
Flow Meter
6" Concrete Pod
Distribution
r Lines ^
\ \
A_i
-See Detail on Figure 6
_ Sampling Terminal
£ (Lysimeter, Gas, Thermister)
3/4 Leochate Return Line
_ S Thermister Probe*.. _
Collection Line T 3" PVC. Leochote
/Collection Pipe
SECTION ' B - B'
TEST CELL SITE PLAN (AS BUILT)
CELL 'D' COMPONENTS
1,000 Gol. Leochote
Collection Tonk
10 20 35 40
SCALE IN FEET
COUNTY OF SONOMA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DONALD B. HEAD DIRECTOR
TEST CELL SITE PLAN
(AS BUILT)
JULY. 1972 SCALE AS SHOWN
FIGURE 7
-------
•D
O
C
O
o
to
•o
: I
0 —
o u
41
i o
X ».
a a.
P 1(8- 71>
1200 feet to Test Cells
Top of Existing Channel Bank
J
Piezometers
Flow Line
of Existing
Channel
Sand
Drainage
Blanket
6 inch
Dia. CMP
Perforated
bottom 5
Collection Sump
backfilled with Pea Gravel
CLAY BARRIER CROSS SECTION
Scale: Imch z 5 feet
91
FIGURE 8
-------
II
o
V v.
CD CL
Tl KB - 71)
r—Typical Cell
_L
x5 i2
PLAN
Sampling Location for
Lysimeters, Gas Probes,
and Thermisters
Typical Identification Symbols
2 feet - Cover Thickness
Lysimeter Located at
2,4, a. 8 feet Below
Cell Bottom
_
Gas Probe and T her mister
Located at 1 foot above Bottom(B),
Middle(M), & 1 foot below Top(T)
of Refuse.
SECTION
LEGEND
C-T
C-4
Cell 'C', Top Probe
Cell 'C. Lysimeter 4 feet
below Cell Bottom
J_
Settlement
Gas Probe
Lysimeter
Sampling Location
Plate
& Thermister
TYPICAL INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION
SCALE : 1 men = 20 feet
92
FIGURE 9
-------
•(13,770)
10.000 -
1972
1973
JIFIM'AIM IJ
1974
TIME-MONTHS
ALKALINITY OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 10
(22,100)
(21,960)
20,000—
(21,180)
A ! M ! J' J ' A1 S1 O1N ! D
1972
1974
TIME-MONTHS
VOLATILE ACID CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE | FIGURE 11
PROJECT 102-1.3
93
-------
70000—,
1971
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND OF LEACHATE I FIGURE 12
70,000-1
60,000 —
X
I" 50,000
I
O
UJ
o
UJ 3QOOO-
X
o
4
U
20000 —
5 10,000-
•189,920)
NlQ
1971
IM< J'l jlAlslo'NlD!j'Fl|!|lAlM'jT7niT8I
1972 ' 1973
TIME-MONTHS
l N! o
1974
PROJECT 102-1.3
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND OF LEACHATE | FIOURE.IS
94
-------
V)
Q
O
V>
O
LJ
O
CO
V)
<
O
40JOOO—
38,000-
32,000-
2 8000—
24,000—
20.000—
I6JOOO—
12,000-
8,000-
4,000-
0
N1 0| J ' F iMiAlMl J ljlA'SlOlNlD]jlFfM'Al|«Tj'jlAlS'Ol N'oTj I F'M' A'M'
1971 ' 1972 ' 1973 ' 1974
TIME-MONTHS
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN LEACHATE
FIGURE 14
E
o
M
O
23.000—
EO.OOO-
t 15,000-
o
o
§ 10.000-
o
I
o
IE
(J
Ul
3^)00-
1971
A " S ' 0 '
1972
J ' F IM I A i
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY OF LEACHATE | FIGURE is
PROJECT 102-1.3
95
-------
(1,892)
01
6
I
(E
O
2,500-
2.000-
1,500-
I.OOO—
500—
NlDl J lMMTAlMlJljTAlSIOlNlD|jTF IMIA lMTjljlA'sTo'NlD| J I F 'MiAl
1971 ' 1972 I 1973 ' 1974
TIME-MONTHS
CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 16
I
UJ
1,400-1
1,200-
1,000-
800 —
Q[ 600-
_J
-------
(8S.OI- -(79.2)
50-
40-
JT 30-
in
o
£
U)
o
20-
10-
TIME-MONTHS
PHOSPHATE CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE I FIGURE is
100—I
I
z
UJ
0.01
N'DJ'F'M'A'M'J'J'A'S'O'N'D
1971 ' 1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
PROJECT 102-1.3
NITRATE-N CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE | FIGURE 19
97
-------
D>
I
Z
u
(9
o
z
o
1,000-
800-
600-
400-
200-
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
AMMONIA-N CONCENTRATION IN LEACHATE
FIGURE 20
o>
I
Z
UJ
o
cr
t-
z
o
z
(T
O
1,000-
100—
10-
N D J ' F ' M
1971
' J ' J ' A
1972
1973
TIME-MONTHS
(o)
/
1974
ORGANIC-N CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 21
PROJECT 102-1.3
93
-------
a
o
1,600-
1,400-
1,200-
1,000-
800-
600-
400—
200-
1971
1972
1973
TIME-MONTHS
SODIUM CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
1974
J I
FIGURE 22
N'D|J'F
1971
1972
ATM'jiJ1A's'O'NID
1973
TIME-MONTHS
1974
POTASSIUM CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE I FIGURE 23
PROJECT 108-1.3
99
-------
I
2
3
u
_i
<
o
3000—1
2,500-
2,000-
1,500-
1,000—
500-
1971
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
CALCIUM CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 24
o>
E
I
2
D
(O
UJ
Z
C9
1,400—1
1,200—
1,000—
800-
600-
400-
200-
11 j » » • • 199* m• >«
N
-------
c
X
o.
7-
6-
5-
1971
J1FI
IAlMl J I JIA'SI O1NlD
1972
10 INl
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
pH OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 26
E
I
z
o
o:
1,100-
1,000-
900-
800-
700-
600
500-
400-
300
200-
100-
0
N'D
(971
J I F ' M1 A'M' J ' J ' A1 S' O1 N1 D
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
IRON CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 27
PROJECT 102-1.3
101
-------
o
o
Q.
2
IT
O
O
O
4
O
tu
u.
I08-
io*H
I03-
I02-
10 -
\B
\
\
NOTE: CURVES PLOTTED TO INDICATE TRENDS.
SEE APPENDIX H. FOR INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS.
N1 Dl J I MM I
1971 '
iJjIjT,
1972
jip IMI AIM' ji ji A i s i o TN T D
1973 .
TIME-MONTHS
JIF!MlA'M1J
1974
FECAL COLIFORM COUNT IN LEACHATE
FIGURE 28
E
O
o
X
0.
o
o
o
o
o
(T
I-
v>
-J
4
O
UJ
I08-
I07-
I06-
I08-
I04-
I03-
I02-
10 -
NOTE: CURVES PLOTTED TO INDICATE TRENDS.
SEE APPENDIX' H. FOR INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS.
1971
1972
i j ] j i
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
PROJECT 102-1.3
FECAL STREPTOCOCCI COUNT IN LEACHATE FIGURE 29
^W^^^^K
102
-------
Ul
W
u
X
4,000 --1
3,000 -i
V)
z
o
-j 2,000 -
I.OOO —
N I D|J r F 1 M T A I M! J T 7 I A T S I OlNlDlJlFlMlAlMljIJlAlslolNlDljlFl
—12,000
r—9.000
-6,000
—3,000
TIME-MONTHS
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION-CELLS A, B 8 E
FIGURE 30
PROJECT IO2-I.3
-------
8
o
-r*
800-
70O-
600-
**. 500-
O
J 400H
3 300
200-
100-
O
O!
WATER DISTRIBUTION
LEACHATE COLLECTION
J VA'S'O' N'DF J 'FTMTA 'M'J
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
CUMMULATIVE WATER DISTRIBUTION AND LEACHATE COLLECTION - CELL.V
-------
Ul
in
UJ
o
z
r^hrrTTTTT1 , rr^fl
: i ;•!•:!:"?• 11 .M i
ui
u
•x>
V)
z
o
10,000 -
8,000 -
6,000 -
4,000 -
2,000 -
N I D
1971
Jl F I M I A I M I J I J I A I S I 0 I N I D I J I
1972 I
Fl M (A I M I J I J
1973
FA I S T 0 I N I D I J I
Fl M I A I M I
1974
- 10,000
-8.000
-6.OOO
- 4.OOO
-2,000
TIME-MONTHS
FLUID ROUTING-CELL "C
FIGURE 32
PROJECT 102-1.3
-------
Ul
ilJ
CO
UJ
u
40.000 —
30,000 —
UJ
Ul
V> 20,000
z
o
10,000 -
LEACHATE AND WATER,
DISTRIBUTED
NlD|jlFlMlAlM|jlj|AlslOlNlD|jlFlMlAlM|j|jlA IS I 0 I N I D
1971 I t 1972 I 1973
TIME-MONTHS
FLUID ROUTING-CELL "D*
I F I M I A I M
1974
—40,000
—30,000
-20,000
—10,000
FIGURE 33
PROJECT IO2-I.3
-------
o
o
i
0.
2
UJ
40—1
35-
30-
25-
20—
15-
10—
5-
'•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE''
r—\
N1 0
1971
iFIMIA'M!jijiA'sio1Nio
1972
' S rOINID
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
MIDDLE THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES-CELLS A-E" I FIGURE 34
• (43.9)
o
o
CC
ZJ
Lkl
Q.
35-
30-
25-
20-
15-
10-
5-
''•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE-''
N D
1971
lw1 A'M' j' J T A1 S'O'N'DJJ 'F IM'A'M'J'J'
1972 ' 1973
TIME-MONTHS
1974
IUII
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES - CELL "A1
FIGURE 35
PROJECT 102-1.3
107
-------
ui
er
<
tlJ
Q.
40-1
35-
30-
25-
20-
15—
10-
5-
MEAN AMHCNT AIR TEMPERATURE''
1971
1972
1973
1974
TIME -MONTHS
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES-CELL"B"
FIGURE 36
u
IE
I
UJ
40—1
35-
30-
25-
20-
15-
10-
\
WEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE
1*0
1971
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
llr-H
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES -CELL"E
| FIGURE 37
PROJECT 102-1.3
108
-------
u
e
I
u
a:
a:
LJ
a.
S
UJ
40-i
35 -
30-
29-
20-
15 -
10-
5 -
v /
MEAN AMBIENT Al* TEMPERATURE'
N'Dlj'FlMlAlMljIj1
1971 ' 1972
I Ml AIM' JIJI A IS'0 IN I D
1973
jIF'M I A'M'j'
1974
TIME-MONTHS
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES-CELL"C"
FIGURE 38
o
o
I
UJ
ac
UJ
40-
35 —
30-
25-
20-
15-
10 —
5 -
..TOP
'•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE-"'
N<0
1971
J'F'M1A1MTjlJ rA'S'0'N ' D
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES - CELL "D"
FIGURE 39
PROJECT 102-1.3
109
-------
lOO-i
80 -
111
_J
o
6O -
CO
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
C.R "A* - MMdl* Prob*
C«ll'B*-Middte Prota*
C«H'C'-Bottom Prob*
C«ll "D'-Top Prob«
C«»'E'-Mlddl. Prob*
I. Celt* A" Gos Somplw CoNvcUd from
Top Prob* Starting 12-11-73.
2. Ctll'C" and'O" Gas AnarfMs of 5-28-74
Corrected for Atmospheric Contamination.
* , . . *-j—*J—T~" . *T~~*r""**'"'*'T""?"1 . . "***•***••*••• , "^*^ . *— r—r-f---i»"-.*** .
NlD|jlFlMlAlMlj|j|AlslOlNlD|jlFlMlAiM|j|j|A!siolNlOij|FlM|AlMlJ
1971 I 1972 I 1973 I 1974
TIME -MONTHS
GAS COMPOSITION
FIGURE 40
PROJECT 102-1.3
-------
m
o
O
to
i
.1 -
u.
i
5-
UJ
2S
UJ
I-
UJ
CO
.4-
o
c
m
*
•AVERAGE VALUE OF 5 SETTLEMENT
PLATES PER CELL.
N 'D J 'F 'STA
1971
J1 J T AT S «OrN 'DTJTFTMfA'M'J'J'A'S'OTN
1972 ' 1973
TIME-MONTHS
•AVERAGE CELL SETTLEMENT
1974
-------
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
IISL
-------
l*-
(C
CJ
4-
c
c
u
c
0
C/J
I
CO
I
O
co
I
& 8
O
"3
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: FEET BORING NO. 1
Tor-
vane
1.0
1.0
liquid
limit
38
31
Plasticity
Index
21
014
Natural
Moisture
Content
Percent
12.8
15.6
15.7
Dry
Density
Lbs./Cu.Ft.
ft
Penet-
ration
4.5+
4.5+
HH
! P1
a O
2
s
n
IE
6
ft mm^^~
10 -y
J -
12
DESCRIPTION
%
P
%
%
(CL) Yellow Brown Sandy CLAY
with roots to 8 inches;
dry , hard .
(Damp, very stiff to hard)
(SC) Yellow Orange Clayey SAND
with trace of fine gravel
@ 4.0' ; moist, stiff.
(Firm)
(Mottled gray with gravel
to % inch in lense; very
moist)
(Blue-green, wet)
Bottom of Trench- 11.0 feet.
REMARKS: Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe .
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
* - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
Ff 1 (8-71(
PLATE A-l'
113
-------
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Tor-
vane
1.0
0.9
Liquid
LMt
30
29
Plasticity
MM
15
15
Natural
Cantant
••rant
11.3
18.7
Dry
Dwnhy
lWCu.Ft.
•
*
4.5
3.5
I
Jt .
I
2
6
8
10
12
REMARKSi Trench excavated with Drott
FEET BORING NO. 2
]l
•MI
•••I
•>•
j
•*•
•••
«•
-^
MM
•MB
M
•MB
•M
•Ml
•C>«
OPO<
•••»
••••
••M
••••
i
•••••i
Z
•MM-
••«•
•••••
••••
••••
••••
••••
§
••MM
•MB*
••HB
••*•»
••M*
••^H
IB^V
••Ml
MBMK
•••Ml
•••>
••MB
MM*
DESCIIPTION
^
i
1
4
(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY
with roots to 8 inches;
dry, hard.
(Damp» very stiff)
(Yellow brown with trace of
fine gravel; grading damp
to moist, stiff)
(Mottled orange and gray)
(lense gravel to V)
Bottom of Trench - 11.5 feet.
Backhoe .
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
A - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
Ft I
PLATE A-2
114
-------
g
o
m
CJ
§
o
o
o
o
to
I
00
I
+J
c
o
CJ
o
c
o
to
I
D
I
CN
O
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Tor-
vane
0.4
0.8
Liquid
limit
Plattklty
Indon
n
Natural
Molitur*
Content
P»rc«nt
19.9
Dry
D«ulty
lbf./Cu.Pt.
A
Peiwt-
raNen
4.5t
3.0
]
.i
1
2
,
6
8
10
12
FEET BORING NO. 3
o
*i
•^
•rrt
W
!
p"^
1
•^^B
~i
DESCRIPTION
'///
yfr
%
W
%
W/
%
^
y//
%
(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY;
grass roots to 8"; dry, hard
(Traces of fine gravel)
(Mottled orange; damp, very
stiff)
(Yellow brown, moist, stiff)
(More sand)
(Mottled orange and gray)
Bottom of Trench - 12.5 feet
DEii ADIfC.
a' Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
" - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
FE 1 (8-71|
PLATE A-3
115
-------
5,
4-
C
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: FEET SORING NO. 4
liquid
limit
30
rloitWty
Mu
17
1
Natural
Mebtur*
Content
torant
18.3
20.2
Dry
Oorally
U»./Cw.rV
*
1 »
o (5
*•••••••
2
*••••••••
MM*.
LL ••••••••
6 -&
±1
10 - —
E
DESCRIPTION
%
^
W
'/fa
^
%
%
(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY with
roots to 8"; dry, hard.
(Damp, very stiff)
1 (Mottled orange; moist,
stiff)
(Very moist)
(Yellow brown; moist, stiff)
Bottom of Trench - 9.5 feet
REMARK&
Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
* - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
ft 1 (»-7U
PLATE A-H
116
-------
It
! - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
•c
xt
co a.
ft I (8-711
117
PLATE A-5
-------
MAJOR DIVISIONS
OARSE GRAINED SOILS
ha 1/2 of Mil > no 2OO sin
More
QRAVELS
(Mar* Ikon 1/2 of
coerce 1 roe lion >
no. 4 sieve til*)
SANDS
(Mare than 1/2 of
coart* fraction <
no. 4 siave lit*)
SYMBOLS TYPICAL SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
GW
l reded gravels or gravel-send mlit«ree, little or ne flwt
GP I.V.4 Poorly graded grovels or gravel-sand miiturss, liltl* or M fine*
6M
»l»» nevels, grovel-sond-wll mutarai
grovel*. grovel-sond-eley mhrture*
SW PM Well graded sands or grevally tends, littla or no fines
SP
SM
sc
Poorly graded sends or gravelly sands, little or no fines
Silty sands, sand-sill miitures
Clayey sands, sand- clay miitures
*»m
FINE GRAINED SOILS
on 1/2 of «oH< no.20O
[More
SILTS a CLAYS
<50
ML
Inorganic silts and very fine sends, rock flour, silly or clayey
fine sands or clayey sills with slight elasticity
Inorganic clays of low to> medium plasticity, gravelly clays,
sandy clays, silly clays, lean clays
Organic silts and organic silly cloys of low plasticity
SJLTS, ft CLAYS
LDSO
Inorganic silts, micaceous or diolomaceous fine sandy or silly soils,
elastic sills
CH
OH
Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays
Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silly clays,
organic silts
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
Pt
P»at and other highly organic tail*
CLASSIFICATION CHART
(Unifmd Soil Classification System)
CLASSIFICATION
BOULDERS
COBBLES
GRAVEL
coart*
fin*
SAND
cocrsi
medium
fine
SILT & CLAY
RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES
US Standard
Sieve Size
Above 12"
12" to $'
$" lo No 4
•f to *M'
V4" 10 No. 4
No 4 4o No. 200
No 4 to No 10
No 10 to No 40
No. 40 to Ne. 200
Below No. 200
Grain Size
in Millimeters
Above 305
305 to 76.2
76.2 to 4.76
76.2 ioi9l
19.1 to 4.76
476 to Q074
476 lo 2 00
ZOOlo 0420
0420io0074
Below 0074
o
z
at
I
CL
ML SOL
CH
-OH -
a
- MH.
M JO «0 50 SO 70 SO
LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTICITY CHART
GRAIN SIZE CHART
METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION
118
PLATE A-6
-------
SUMMARY OF PERMEABILITY TESTS
TRENCH
NO.
DEPTH
ft.
DENSITY
pcf
PERMEABILITY
@ 20"C
cm/sec
ft./year
2.5-3.0
5.5
U.O
106.0
112.U
6.6 x 10'8
2.3 x 10~7
3.1 x 10
-7
0.066
0.23
0.31
SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TRENCH
NO.
DEPTH
ft.
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
2.5-3.0
4.5-5.0
2.75
2.58
Project 102-1.3
PLATE A-7
-------
PLASTICITY CHART
60
50
40
30
20
10
7
4
CH
10 20 30 40 50 60
LIQUID LIMIT («)
PLASTICITY DATA
70
80
90 100
Pro j ect
KEY
SYMBOL
€
e
•
o
XBk
T^O
*
HOLE
NO
1
2
<*
5
DEPTH
2.5-3.0
4.5-5.0
1.0-1.5
8.0-9.0
5.5
4.0
LIQUID
LIMIT
(')
38
31
30
29
30
39
PLASTICITY
INDEX
21
14
15
15
17
24
UNIFIED
SOIL
CLASSI-
FICATION
SYMBOL
CL
SC
CL
CL
CL
CL
L07-1.2
120
PLATE A-8
-------
O
O
§
1
o
o
o
i
0
i
OJ
0
§
i
f
P
s1
o
CL
(0
m
j>
CD
c_
O
Doto || g^AD&TIOM TEST RESULTS ||
LL II 38
PL II 1 7
PI 21
WAT. tt/C 12.8
CLASSIF. SYM0 CL
SAMPLE MO. ]
DEPTH FT 2.5-3.0
HOLE NO. 1
25K3 <
IOO
00
CO
7C
«D
O)
SO
t-
X
tut
EL
SO
20
1C
31
17
14
15.6
sc
2
J». 5-5.0
1
-
-
-
15.7
SC
3
10.0-10.5
1
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS J
lacjiH 7KS isciiN eouitt. ®BIM. IMIW mm. goo
.._,
U 1 fSO
TTife^-
#^@—
ff 1 fed
U | C]
17 ^
»
J7 S^OU
^U
1- 0 /\
L *j" J .U
w5 — =^
10.0-
i ^-^
30
15
15
11.3
CL
1
1 .0-1 .5
2
29
l*j
15
18.7
CL
2
8.0-9.0
2
U9. OTAHOflQD SERIES
too so so 10
.•
.
-•
' ' 'U"'
—
/
/
_/ '
y x
~* — " ^r^"
_JL^
= — ' — (I
H
J * ^ — Cn
} ' f-J
."
. *
• ^)
s^
r #
^
S /
f'
/
/ A
\T- 1—
- ' /i ' - /
s X
^x
f
!
^
*
_ '
s~
\f
II
1 1 "s »iuff .«S Si8??^'5
CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT inoa- PLASTIC)
.K
/
J
.
.X
^jr
j^" ^"
jf^
T ^
S
S s
S j
,' /
/ X
/
• * *
J^*>*'
^^~
gX' ^^
— •^*J
*^ _x*
/ *"
_/" ^ '
•' ^
IX
0 .COT .950 I.
DIAMETER 0? PARTICLE tC] U
HOE J
. - •
-
-
-
19. 9
30
3
17
8.3
CL
1 l i
=F. 0-7-0
3
5-5
k
-
-
-
20.2
CL.
2
9.0
3^
TS^
2^
15- & 13.8
CL
1 2
i».0 8.5
A \ 5 5
SIEVE ANALYSIS
| CLEAR 06UAR2 OPENINGS
Q C 3/0" 3A>" 1- I/S" S" S° 0° 0
^fff^^
^^X
^X-*"""
"--^" J** '
X*' X
X
X
CJ
9 2.
iLtmETEF
SAND
SaEDlUB ||
^-rMfce^^ff5"
. -""" xJ
^s*T *^
^
__
0 4.
s
•••* W^-
x^, "*^
**"
i
1
K
8
•S 092
COAR3E |
I
8
J-
«
f
8
I
A
\
11 \
1 _
-------
COMPACTION TEST
130
125
120
u
o
IT
O
115
110
y
7
7
ZERO AIR
VOIDS CURVE
\
10 15
MOISTURE CONTENT %
20
(O
Z
(t
O
ZERO AIR
VOIDS CURVE
MOISTURE CONTENT
PROJECT NO. 102-1.3
SAMPLE NO.
1
SAMPLE DEPTH
2.5' - 3.0'
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Brown Sandy
CLAY
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
2.78
TEST DESIGNATION
D1557-70
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY •( PCf)
123.5
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
12.0
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TEST DESIGNATION
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY (PCf)
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
122
PLATE A-10
-------
APPEND!X B
TEST CELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
-------
TABLE A
i
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DATE
OF
TEST
1971
10-1
10-1
10-6
10-8
10-11
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
APPROX.
DEPTH
OF
FILL
(feet)
2.0
2.0
3.0
4.5
5.5
4.5
3.5
2.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
5.0
. 5.0
5.0
0.0
LOCATION
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
APPROX.
ELEVA-
TION
( (feet) )
297.0
297.0
298.0
299.5
300.5
300.5
• 301.5
302.5
303.0
304.0
304 . 0
303.0
277.5
277.0
278.0
275.5
275.0
276.. 5
278.0
FIELD
DRY
DENSITY
(pcfl)
113.0
115.5
110.0
118.0
110.0
115.0
113.0
119.5
106.0
114.0
115.2
109.0
121.2
113.2
110.2
115.0
111.0
108.0
110.5
WATER
CONTENT
(%)
13.0
13.6
13.5
15.0
15.6
18.6
19.2
11.3
21.2
17.1
19.5
19.2
11.7
18.8
16.2
10.9
17.1
20.8
14.0
MAXIMUM
LAB
DRY
DENSITY
(pcf)l
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
.114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
RELA-
TIVE
COM-
PACTION
(%)
99.0
101.5
96.5
103.5
97.0
102.0
99.0
105.0
93.0
100.0
101.0
96.0
106.0
99.5
97.0
101.0
97.5
94.5
97.0
REMARKS
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Cells A 6 E
Re -worked 6
Accepted
Cells A & E
PROJECT NO. 102-1.3
124
PLATE B-l
-------
TEST
120
115
u
a.
2 no
u
o
tr
o
105
100
\
\
ZERO AIR
VOIDS CURVE
10
15 20 25
MOISTURE CONTENT - %
(T
O
ZERO AIR
VOIDS CURVE
MOISTURE CONTENT
PROJECT NO. 102-1.3
SAMPLE NO.
Stockpile
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Brown clayey
fine SAND
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
2.75 (est.)
TEST DESIGNATION
D 698-70
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY '( PCf)
im.o
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
16.3
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TEST DESIGNATION
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY (pcf)
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
125
PLATE B-2
-------
iTnDLL
F"1
o
o
I
Z
o
o
M
CC
O
'J
T?
<>
KADATION TEST RESULTS J
LL
PL
PI
NAT W/C
CLASSiF SYMB.
SAMPLE; NO. ("c§a^te
DEPTH FT
HOLE NO. .Kaiser •
100
9C
»0
1
K-
."^
a
so
so
10
o
_. --
,.„„_ :;,.
g
J
I/
//
J
r» » •*
7 5
R Or PART
RO JEHIC3
9 1
1
* f
f
\
^^^ '
O 1.
OLE IN M
1
f
S
a
^ — --1
9 2
ILLIMETEf
(EVE Al
t
s^~ '*
*~ -•/
't 1
1
j
•*-«»/ —
-f
j
f
1
-j- —
i ' i
8 t.
S
SAND
fINE KCOlUM
COA93E
4ALYS1S
s/
— *•"
L imi r
Srare
s
9
CLt
a" s/<
of Fi
of La
o
•Z ><
AR
If
O
.1
30UAR
1- 1
-Wqy
forn
3
: OPENINGS
n" >
a 1971
^ 8 k S
\- rt
GRAVEL
FIKC
CC«»5E
1—
1—
-f—
i
U
1 (—
-i- 1
1 1-.-
1—
u-
i
h
-r
U
1 —
1—
' M -i
DOO |
2 «r i
' R
i
i
COBBLES
O
O
X)
Q
UJ
U
E
ao
1 §8838
[ PERCENT
-------
^
>
CD
t
.*
V
V
f
c
CM
N
i
«
c
O
z
•2.
O
CO
8-
c
o
'o
\t
0
_J
>,
+^
c
O
0
™
E
o
L:
O
t/)
c
ft
*~
u
n
*T
C\J
O
t
.0
E
3
z
u
'o
CL
71)
/
/
^*-^
\ , y^
S ' /
\ /
^ /
\ x
1. 83 1.67 2.50 2.00 1.92 2.(58
1
1
1
2*17 2^7 2^3 2*Ss 2^)0 2.(83
I
1
1
" * " x x •* x i
2.jOO 1.75 2.58 2.50 1i67 2.|42
I I
I I
'l ' I
« x x x x Jc
2.M7 2.33 • 2.25 -2.83 2.67 2.125
I
1 1
1
. 1
1 '
1 1
"k x x x x i
2.|08 2.08 2.42 2.25 2.58 2^00
1 |
1 .1
1 |
1 • t
, 4.
/1.92 2.25 1.83 2.50 2.17 1.67\
. s.
/ \
. • V
' ^
/ \
/ \
' \
CELL 'A'
COVER THICKNESS SN FEET
SCALE : 1 inch = 1O feet
(
t
127
PLATE B-4
-------
c
o
0
w
o
^
^
^
X
jt
s
»>
*^
c
0
O
m
E
0
c
'c
•_ f
o —
0 U
PI
T'
CM
o
».
11
-0
E
3
Z z
z
O u
t>
'o
CD A.
(B-71)
\ ' . .
\
\
, \
\
\
\
1.*90 195 1&5 195
1*95 2.OO 2^5O 2^2O
* X X X
1j90 2. 2O 2.55 230
I ,
I . . {.»
1
2JOO 2^20 250 2^90
1
1
1
1
ik x x x_
1.|75 2.OO 2.35 2>5
|
1
1
1
• V M" U
/1.45 1.85 2.30 2.50
*
'
s
CELL 'B'
COVER THICKNESS
: SCALE: 1 inch = 1O feet
^-
•
'
*
'
.'
f
/
I
I
X i
2.40 1H90
I
I
'I
&0 2.|1O
1
1
1
2X65 2*05
1
1'
1
2X00 2410
| •
I
|
1
2.20 2.35\
\
\
\
\
\
\
IN FEET
128
PLATE B-5
-------
a
•a
I
t) —
Q U
""^^BBB-^ —
V
\
N
N
S
\
\
\2.25 2.08 2.42 2.06
^0 1.08 0*83 "vbO
I .
I
2^67 1.8,3 2j25 2jOO
0*92 1.08 O.83 l3>8
1
I
V2 'SI7 ^° 2x7
IjOO 1.17 1.25 • 0.92
1
, .(.,
1
2.142 2.17 2.00 2.17
it X X X
0.'83 1.00 1.00 1.00
i
1 •
1 •
1
1
2V|7 2.08 2.17 2.00
1.133 1.17 1.O8 1.17
1
1
1
I
|
2^58 V9_2 1^83 2£)8
Xl.OO 1.25 1.00 0.83
/
/
/
CELL SC'
COVER THICKNESS
LEGEND
2.25 Thickness of Soil Cover
X
1.00 Thickness of Sand Cover
SCALE : 1 inch : 1O feet
^^
7
. «
*
'
.
.
2.17 2.08/
"o^as 0^2
I
I
1
2^08 2J.17
0.92 Q|67
1
1
1
2.33 2^25
0K92 1.|33
1
1
1
2.25 2.i33
X 4
1.08 1.|00
1
1
1
2.17 2j08
X *
1.17 1.IO8
I '
I
i '
102 2JOO
0.92 Q92S
\
\
\
IN FEET
5
z
z
o
v_
'o
PL Alt' U-6
-------
ID
t>
l>
JE
U
C4
o —
O U
C\J
o
2
o
II 1(6-71)
^^8^
\
\
X
X
N*-42
V|00
1
1
'i67
0/83
1
|
-1.52
0|92
1
1
1
2|33
i.'oo
I
1
1
1
1.IOO
1
1
1
1.'67
J.
/1.O8
.
'
/
s
/
1.92
1.00
1I?2
1.08
1.67
a92
1.67
X,
1.0O
2.00
X
0.83
1.92
1.OO
COVER
LEGEND
2.42
X
1.OO
Thickness
Thickness
2.00
0.92
2^5
0.92
V5 .
1.O8
1x75 -
1.17
1.67
X
1.17
1.50
O.83
CELL
1.83
1.08
'x17
1.00
.£2
1.00
2-17
X
1.00
2.00
X
0.92
1.67
1.O8
'D1
THICKNESS IN
of Soil Cover
of Pea Gravel
SCALE: 1 inch = 1O
Cover
feet
2.17
0.92
2X°°
1.17
1.92
X.
1.25
1.67
X
Q92
1.75
X
1.25
1.58
O.92
FEET
.
\&T/
1.|00
1
1
1
1.|08
1
1
1
ijpe
1.|08
1
1
1
1.|08
1
I
1
1
1^50
1.IO8
I
1
1
2.'l7
- •*
1.OCN
V,
X
\
\
\
X
130
PLATf-I B-7
-------
, f.V
00
•o
tl
JC
v
tl
JC
O .
O
O —
o u
X i.
CO O.
I H8-7II
«»-»
\
\
\
\
\
X
\
\
2^7 2*00 "vVs "2*00
2*33 2*50 1*92 2*50
i * v * y
1.i83 1.83 2.67 267
\
1
1
2.108 21fo • 2*50 2^5O
1
1
1
1
* X X X'
2.|75 2.50 1.75 2.33
I
I
1
1
•if VI W
/1.83 2J7 2.67 1.67
-
.
. •
/ s
s
,
CELL 'E'
COVER THICKNESS IN
SCALE : 1 inch r 10 feet
••••
>
.
.'
.
>
S
/
I
I
1
2*Ss 1.|75
1
1
I
1
&2 1-|67
1
1
1
2^0 2^)0
1
1
2^33 2.|17
|
I
I
I
.., vi_. „ J.
1.67 2.25\
\
\
N
\
\
\
N
FEET
131
PLATE 8-B
-------
APPENDIX C
CLAY BARRIER CONSTRUCT ION DATA
-------
TABLE A
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DATE
OF
TEST
1971
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/16
8/16
8/17
8/17
8/17
8/18
8/18
8/18
8/18
APPROX.
DEPTH
OF
FILL
(foot)
4.5
3.5
2.0
6.0
7.0
7.5
8.5
9.0
10.0
10.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.5
17.5
18.5
19.5
LOCATION
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
APPROX.
ELEVA-
TION
( (feat) )
190.5
189.5
187.0
192.0
193.0
193.5
194.0
194.0
195.0
195.0
194.0
195.0
196.0
197.0
198.0
199.0
200.00
201.5
202.5
203.5
204.5
FIELD
DRY
DENSITY
(pcfl)
118.7
114.0
113.2
113.7
111.5
114.2
117.2
117.7
122.2
119.5
120.0
118.0
119.7
117.0
119.2
117.2
121.2
118.0
113.7
116.2
122.5
WATER
CONTENT
(%>
16.4
15.8
17.4
15.1
16.4
15.5
15.6
16.4
15.3
15,5
15.0
15.6
15.7
15.4
15.7
16.4
15.4
16.2
17.4
19.3
15.9
MAXIMUM
LAB
DRY
DENSITY
IpcfP
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
115.0
116.0
116.0
RELA-
TIVE
COM-
PACTION
(*)
103
99
98
99
97
99
101
102
105
103
104
102
103
101
103
101
105
102
98
100
105
REMARKS
Re -worked 6
Accepted
I! 11
II II
M II
II II
Sand Cone
Density
Test Method
• NOTE: All field density determination by nuclear method except as noted.
PROJECT 102-1.3
133
PLATE C-1
-------
12Q
100
10
15 20
CONTENT %
s
O
R-
MO. 102-1.3
SAMPLE WO.
SAMPLE DEPTH
From Stockpile
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Browng Sandy
CLAY
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
2.65 (est.)
TEST DESIGNATION
ASTM D698-70
DRV
DENSITY '( PC?)
116.0
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
1U.5
SAMPLE WO.
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TEST DESIGNATION
MAKIMUM 9RY
DENSITY (pcf)
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
134
PLATE C-2
-------
APPENDIX D
INSTRUMENTATION DETAIL DRAWINGS
-------
1
1
1*
c
3 .
C
C
1
5
ec
i
1
VJ
^
1
01
"
O
0
w
>
C
(J
S
c
Jj
t c
M
2
z
o
>
fV
•
1
CM
0
j
a
w
*
Tl 1(1-71)
Thermister Wiring .
ft.1^% <*l MBkS^AV &K _P A • • — — —
NO. 3 Rubber stopper — ^^
3/4 • inch FVC Coupling — *•
| |
•thp-
^r~
M i
!!<
F • 'I
r^L'
1 H
" H
1 i
1/4 - inch Simplex Tubing •4T**~--^frl i)
3/4 - inch FVC Schedule 40 —
1 /8 " Typ. f"
3/16" Typ.
3/4 -inch FVC End Cap-*-
C
I
--^A'
1
u_^
?
H
h
1
n
LL _____
»_ _ _
//^
.472
/
\,
— i
-
_-JJ
— ~.-S
•~5\
^\
n^
d
L__
2"
2"
1/2"
36 "-Stagger Slots at 2
inch Intervals around
Pipe Circumference
Notes:
1. If thermister is
placed inside probe,
epoxy thermister to
tube wall or stopper
2. Fabricate holes in
Rubber stopper for
Tubing and Wiring and
seal with Epoxy.
^ — ^^ RU^T>^"
GAS PROBE D-l
Full Scale /^/,
/• ^-j^UX
-------
re
c
u
O
n
o
c
3
O
O
C
o
trt
e
_i
£
2 inch Pipe
2 inch Coupling
SECTION A-A
I
u
>
*J
C
C
N
S
C
(/
I
cs
a
Z
0
» _
• ft.
rd Pipe Cap— w-
Galvanized Iron
i Galvanized Iron
Coupling -*
\
>^\V
$
i y^
Variable
IA
3 \ /
b=>
t-»"x20"x
1^
ELEVATION
SETTLEMENT PLATE DETAIL
II 1(«->I)
Scale: 1 inch = 6 incb««
-131-
-------
ID
n
o
c
o
o
I
C
1
1
o
c
2
i
M
ft
I
CM
O
O
Removable
PVC Cap
12
" '•".: •
Concrete V».»
Plug
Impervious
2 inch PVC
Schedule 40
Slotted 2 inch
PVC Schedule 40
(See Detail)
Concrete Sand
Bond PVC Cap
/
/
6"
Stagger 1/16 inch
wide Stats
around Pipe
Circumference
36" Min.
PU
3"
Variable
SLOTTING DETAIL
Scale: 1 inch s 2 inches
12"
INSTALLATION DETAIL
Scale: 1 inch: 1 foot
OBSERVATION WELL DETAIL
n ni-T
138
PLATE 0- 3
-------
Monitoring Station
Alternate Monitoring
Station Location
c
i.
o
m
o
§
o
IV
I
i
c
o
o
N
I
«l
sl
I
Cv4
O
fl
II
».
• V"
»»
PVC Elbow and Riser I h*~~Pvc RlSer
with Rubber Stopper
Coil
and
10 feet of Tubing
Cap Ends
•Backfill with Moist
Compacted Impervious
Soil
Backfill with Piezoseal
2 inch Boring
1/4 inch QQ Polyethylene Tubing
Lysimeter
Variable
4" Compacted
Impervious Soil
Variable
6 " Concrete Sand
e_
"5"
Tl Hi-71)
LYSIMETER SAMPLING SYSTEM
Scale: 1 inch s 1 foot
J> -
-------
1 inch PVC
H»mW
V
Impervious Backfill
1-inch PVC Scheduled
6-inch Boring
1-1/2 -inch QD Porous
Tube and Reducer
Coupling (See Detail )
Concrete Sand
Variable
1-71)
PIEZOMETER INSTALLATION DETAIL
Scale : 1 inch = i foot
140 PLATE °"5
-------
(0
o
i
i
01
\
0 —
o u
O
12'
n
II
•*- 1 - inch PVC Schedule 40
I-1/2-inch * 1 inch PVC
Reducer Coupling
1-1/2-inch PVC Schedule 60
Sleeve
1 - 1/2 - inch O.D. Norton
porous Tube P2120
NO. 5 Rubber Stopper
PIEZOMETER TIP DETAIL -/V/-
Scale : 1 inch = 2 inches
-------
APPENDIX E
REFUSE COMPOSJTSONAl DATA
-------
RANDOM SAMPLE ASSIGNMENT
CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
21
55
92
160
168
180
189
224
238
255
359
457
480
CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
10
55
63
145
168
211
252
358
359
420
436
438
456
493
A
Sample
No.
A-21
A-55
A-92
A-160
A-168
A-180
A-189
A-224
A-238
A-255
A-359
A-457
A-480
D
Sample
No.
D-10
D-55
D-63
D-145
D-168
D-211
D-252
D-358
D-359
D-420
D-436
D-438
D-456
D-493
NOTE: Random sample
CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
11
14
78
125
178
186
187
255
265
336
365
370
439
495
CELL NO.
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
80
86
87
105
157
250
259
276
295
338
362
407
432
495
numbers (500
Handbook
B
Sample
No.
B-ll
B-14
B-78
B-125
B-178
B-186
B-187
B-255
B-265
B-336
B-365
B-370
B-439
B-495
E
Sample
No.
E-80
E-86
E-87
E-105
E-157
E-250
E-259
E-276
E-295
E-338
E-362
E-407
E-432
E-495
unit sample)
CELL NO. C
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
56
118
142
159
176
178
254
261
262
394
420
472
496
499
obtained
Sample
No.
C-56
C-118
C-142
C-159
C-176
C-178
C-254
C-261
C-262
C-394
C-420
C-472
C-496
C-499
from :
of Tables for Mathematics, 4th 1
Chemical Rubber Co.
18901 Cranwood Pkwy., Cleveland, Ohio 44128
PLATE E-l
143
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION
CELL A
SAMPLE #
food
waste
garden
plastictcxtilc
rubber,,
•V
A21
70»3
T7G~
xTTrnn057^
•~^... ^ =)!=>. *—>-i
^*l
T7B
22^2
79»7
13»9
8.2
"29
A92
vrt<
- §^
1677
152.1
6.1
"22.3
Oo
=_i°^-
30c
Jol
7
r
364<
A160
602
12.2
26.9 3.0
373"
600
Wtn
13-JL
191 o*4
JL8o_6 1 _2_0
10607~Tl6
0,8
_0ol_
Oo5
8o2
5.1
19°©
573d
;i8o
32.6
9.5
_
1.5"
11.5n 2002 1.0
[
A189
1.8
50»1
0ol
33oO
Q06
A224
Wtc
2100
loi
SCJU -^T-L
3oO
"SBoO"
A238
10o5
32cO_
.0
I
Tn
605
=26To'
^n
SB "voE
A255
A359
JoO
9
"oTS*
Io5
'CF
1201
11
37
33o6
1775'
210 3
'67T5"1
lob
•2TT2'
lic6S135
Icl
1.8"
.5
L_
% is
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION DATA
CELL B
plastic t©xtil< wood
5.6 I 0.7 1.1
17:0-7 an) nr 373
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION DAT*,
CELL C
CD
I iJ.
Iri3o8
0.3 I • ^2c7j|
I ^90l_
0,1 Tl33.2
208 133.1
^§ 208 30.2
111.12..3
1
18.1J 9.5
6 j_ 1 ^606
28»9 iSOlol
J-^.^JLia.6__
2g7ojf37o5
9.311 Oo6
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION D&TA
CELL D
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION
GILL E
-5s.
00
1.9L28.5
155.3 1
_5o_01 ^606
21o9«203oO
Q02
i.oT
6.2JI 38
18.61 112
37ol 133.1
-------
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT DATA - CELL A
sample
no.
21
55
92
160
163
180
224
238
255
359
457
480
total total
•ret wt.pry wt.
12.25
13.70
11.55
25.52
8,67
10.66
12.41
1 1
7.69
9.80
7.38
17.59
6.55
8.15
10.14
moist
59.3
'39-8
56.5
45.1
32.4
30.8
22.4
4»
n
QO
OE
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
/^moisture
food
waste
gai'dei
wast.*
p«tper
nK'Srici
nibber
textile
wood
metal
glass,
leranic
ash,
rock
fines
Coozposit of samples „
NOTE - Cooposit Drying Samples were not taken for Cell A
O«5
01
total wet
wgjghtr $
total dry
weight #
^noisture
•
Conrposit of samples, . -
0}
o<»
m
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^moisture
Ccrrposit of samples,
* $ are % of dry weight.
-------
•REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT DATA - CELL B
en
O
sample
no.
11
14
78
125
178
186
187
255 -
265
f
336
365
370
439
495
total
*et wt.
13.45
7.61
7.41
4.94
6.59
5.93
6.27
6.60
5.39
4.1 81
5.90
7.00
5.64
10.88
total
dry wt.
9-89
6.14
5.19
4.04
5.11
3.94
3.88
4.29
4.19
2.93
4.87
3.98
5.03
7.96
%
noist
36.0
23-9
42.8
22.3
29.0
50.1
61.6
53.9
28.6
64.2
21.2
75.9
12.1
36.7
*>
CO
CO
12
OS
0(3
i n
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^moisture
food
waste
10.02
4.0^
L48.0
gardei
waste
7.10
4.42
60.3
ipaper
7.34
5.82
26.1
rilfl«^t'.ir:
rubber
6.80
5.90
15.3
textile
6.60
4.98
32.5
wood
7.04
6.56
7.3
Coinposit of samples , B-ll, B-14,B-78, B-125
4»
•HCV
a
00
&
83
n
O3>
PH
ao,
oca
03
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^aoisture
10.92
4.58
138.4
6.84
3.79
80.5
. •
9.98
8.00
24.8
8.53
7.22
18.1
9.48
6.49
46.1
7.67
6.40
19.8
9.86
9.28
6.3
11.73
11.62
1.0
5.03
4.38
14.8
10.87
7.14
52.2
t
en.
CompOSit Of samples, B-336, B=365. B-370, B-439, B-495
* % are % of dry weight.
-------
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT - CELL C
I
!
j
n
_i
t-
W
vb
sample! total
iiC * p^rs u vrc *
56 ( 6.63
113
142
159
176
178
.
254
251
262
394
420
472
49 S
8.75
7.63
5.05
6.46
11.73
8.31
6.48
6.28
11.73
7.90
5.69
6.20
\ " ~ ~i
\ 499 " 4.98
! • !
total
Iry wt.
4.63
5.59
6.44
3.92
4.94
5.32
6.78
5.89
4.69
8.10
5.31
4.84
5.23
3.55
moist
43.2
56.5
18.5
23.8
30.8
120.5
22.6
10.0
33.9
44.8
48.3
17.6
18.6
40.3
p
3)
055
OS
o<3
to
total wet
weight #
total dry
v/eight #
^moisture
food
waste
13.82
6.01
130.0
gardei
waste
9.65
4.70
105.3
ipaper.
13i79
10.34
33.4
n1a03it Of saoples, C-254, C-261, C-262.
C-499.
•P
n
00
PH
EOL
OC3
0)
total wet
weieht #
total dry
weight #
^.moisture
•
6.35
5.72
11.0
metal
12.00
11.22
7.0
glass
13.73
13.65
0.6
ash,
rock
15.48
12.30
25.9
fine si
11.77
8.46
39.1
, C-176. C-178
16.34
15.38
6.2
16.80
16.65
0.9
15.48
12.30
25.9
16.54
10.65
53.3
C-394. C-420, C-472. C-496.
Composit of samples.
% £ire % of dry weight.
-------
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT - CELL D
en
PC
Sejsple
no".
10
55
63
145
168
211
252
358
•
259
420
438
436
456
493
t.
total
vet wt.
6.93
4.06
5.42
5.76
7.28
8.3S
6.70
17.01
17.01
6.80
9.51
8.59
8.97
DAT
!
total
dry wt.
5.47
2.94
4.26
4.94
5.90
4.82
5.29
12.44
12.44
5.77
8.28
6.59
6.90
i LOST
i
%
coist
26.7
38.1
27.2
16.6
23.4
73.4
26.7
36.7
36.7
17.9
14.9
30.4
30.0
•P
n
OT
OH
EQ<
OH!
003
n\
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
/iaoisture
food
waste
11.12
4.79
L32.2
garden
waste
3.28
4.35
90.3
ipaper
9". 24
7.36
25.5
T^la^t-.ir-'
rubber
6.71
5.73
17.1
textile
10.45
8.22
27.1
wood
9.20
7.19
27.96
metal
12.42
11.76
5.6
glas^
:eraa.c
13.28
13.18
0.8
ash,
rock
7.36
6.37
15.5
fines
12.22
8.22,
48.7
Composit of samples , D-10, D-55, D-63, D-145, D-168, D-211
4»
•HN
n
oa>
IS
OB
«CJ
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
/^Eoisture
•
Conposit of
•P
w
o®
PH
BO.
ot3
n
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^aoisture
4.97
2.71
83.4
9.16
4.Q4
L26.7
11.73
9.41
24.6
5.58
4.97
12.3
6.73
5.64
19.3
6.99
5.85
19.5
•9.44
9.01
4.8
12.18
12.14
0.3
2.96
2.50
18.4
9.55
6.38
49.7
sanqples,D-252, D-358, D-359. D-420, D-438
8.31
3.49
138.1
2.61
1.39
87.8
5.21
3.18
53.8
4.48
3.87
15.8
4.59
3.34
37.4
4.86
4.13
17.7.
6.70
6.61
1.4
7.05
7.03
0.3
5.32
4.74
12.2
5.67
3.94
43.9
Composit of samples, D-^36, D-456, D-493
TJ
>
W
I
(-»
o
* % are % of dry weight,
-------
rtEFUSE MOI5TUHE CONTENT DATA - CELL E
saaple
no.
80
a.f,
37
i 05
1 77
250
25:'
276
29?
338
362
407
432
495
total
•vet wt.
8.38
9.84
9.95
6.67
10.54
3.39
7.00
f .53
2.52
4.52
5.15
4.48
6.41
?.5«
total
dry wt.
7.21
3.10
8.55
6.15
7.62
2.05
4.50
4.59
2.02
3'. 44
4.35
3.27
5.34
5.09
%
moist
16.2
21.5
16.4
8.5
38.3
65.4
55.6
42-3
24.R
31.4
18.4
37.0
20.0
68.2
43
ai
OOJ
OH
Ea
oe
onj
to
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^iaoisture
food'
waste
11 .52
4.83
138. 5
gardez
waste
10.30
5.78
78.2
ip^per
li.ll
7.94
39.9
rja«rtjff'
lubber
8,95
7.75
L5.5
textile
8.74
7.50
16.5
wood
4.87
4.36
11.7
Composit of samples , 5-80, E-86, E-87, E-105,
.p
•HCVJ
n
O03
§3
o§
ucg
n
total wet
weight fr
total dry
weight #
5&aoisture
Compos it Of
t>
n
00
OH
BO
OcO
n
total wet
weight JF
total dry
weight #
^moisture
15.09
7.50
101.2
14. '20
7.75
83.2
14.34
11.49
24.8
9.21
7,47
23.3
13.47
10.09
33.5
saaples, £-250, E-259, E-276,
7.54
3.32
127.1
4.69
2.21
112.2
4.37
3.28
33.2
4.28
3.50
22.3 '
w .
z
>
tr<
M
5.03
4.23
18.9
E-295.
2.60
2.13
22,1
aetal
10.37
10.16
2.1
glas$
keraofijc
13.28
13.21
0.5
ash,
rock
9.15
8.59
6.5
5-157
12.41
12.08
2.7
14.40
14.17
1.6
11.43
10.53
8.6
fines
13.03
9.82
32.7
8.34
5.61
48.7
E-338, E-362, E-407
3.86
3.63
6.3
4.52
4.49
0.7
5.71
4.60
24.1
4.18
2.42
72.7
Composit of samples, n-432, E-495
% are % of dry weight.
&..
-------
APPENDIX F
MONITORiNG SCHEDULES
-------
SUMMARY SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Initial Frquency of Analysis for Various Parameters
1
Parameter
K
Na
Ca
Mg
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cu
Cd
Cl
PCB
pH
Alkal inity
COD
BOD
IDS
TSS
Sett leable Sol ids
N i t rogen
Ammonia
Organ i c - N
Nitrate - N
Initial
Leachate
*
*
semi -month 1 y**
semi -month 1 y**
*
*
*
*
*
semi -month 1 y**
*
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y
semi -monthly
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y
semi -month 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
Frequency
Groundwater
*
*
mon th 1 y**
monthly**
*
*
*
*
*
semi -month 1 y**
*
semi -monthly
semi -month 1 y
monthly**
monthly**
semi -month ly
none
none
month 1 y**
none
month ly**
155
PLATE F-l
-------
Parameter Leachate Groundwater
* .
Total Phosphate semi-monthly none
DO semi-monthly none
Color semi-monthly none
Volatile Acids monthly*** none
Fecal Coliform semi-monthly** monthly**
Fecal Streptococci semi-monthly** none
* Baseline data to be collected monthly at least for the first
six months. The frequency of analysis will then be reeval-
uated on the basis of the available data.
** Frequency of analysis may change as the data are reviewed.
*** Baseline date to be collected at least the first 4 months
within subsequent analysis depending on development of pH,
alkalinity and BOD data.
156 PLATE F-2
-------
SUMMARY SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of Gas Analysts
Commencing February 15, 1972
Cel1 Location
Cel1 A - Bottom
A - Middle
A - Top
Sampling Frequency
Quarterly
Monthly
Quarterly
Cel1 B - Bottom
B - Middle
B - Top
Quarterly
Monthly
Quarte r1y
Cel 1 C - Bottom
C - Middle
C - Top
Quarterly
Monthly
Quartly
Cel1 D - Bottom
D - Middle
D - Top
*
*
Monthly
Cell E - Bottom
E - Middle
E - Top
Quarterly
Monthly
Qua rter1y
No gas samples can be withdrawn from these probes due to fluid
interference. Attempts in January 1972 to remove fluids encount
ered in these probes were unsuccessful. Attempts will be made
periodically to withdraw samples.
Project 102-1.3
157
PLATE F-3
-------
SUHHARY SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of Analysls for Various Parameters
Parameter
K
Na
Ca
Hg
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cu
Cl
PCB
pH
Alkalinity
COD
BOD
TDS
TSS
Settleable Sol ids
Ni trogen
Ammon i a
Organic N
Nitrate N
Sulphate
Tot. Phosphate
DO
Color
Volati 1e Acids
Feca 1 col I form
Elect. Conductivl
Fecal Streptococc
Commencing February 15, 1972
Leachate
Cel Is A, B & E
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
quarterly
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
quarterly
ty 6-week intervals
i semi -annua 1 1 y
Cells C & D
mon th 1 y
month ly
semi -monthly
semi -monthly
monthly
month ly
monthly
monthly
semi -mon th ly
quarterly
semi-monthly
semi -month ly
semi -monthly
semi-monthly
semi -month 1 y
semi -month 1 y
quarterly
semi -monthly
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -month 1 y
quarterly
semi -month 1 y
semi -monthly
semi -monthly
mon th ly
quarter 1 y
sem 1 -month ly
semi -annual ly
Groundwater
Wells 1 thr
A & E Subdr
Water Suppl
Cel 1 C
quarterly .
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
semi -annual
monthly
quarterly
quarterly
semi -annua 1
quarterly
quarterly
semi -annua 1
semi -annua 1
quarterly
month ly
----
..
semi -annual
month ly
semi -annual
•u k
aln
y
ly
ly
ly
ly
ly
ly
*lnitial test of Cell A leachate will include all parameters listed In
December 1971 schedule in addition to those listed above.
PLATE
158
-------
SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of Fluid Samplin
Revised May, 197
Analysis
Parameter
Leachate
CelIs A, B 6 E
CelIs C
Groundwater
Wells 1 thru k*
A S E Subdraln*
Water Supply
Cell C
ATkalInlty
B.O.D.
Cadm!urn
Calclurn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Copper
o-week I ntervals3-weekintervals
6-week Intervals 3-week Intervals
6-week intervals 6-week Intervals
6-week Intervals 3-week intervals
6-week intervals 3-week intervals
6-week intervals 3-week intervals
6-week intervals 6-week intervals
Dissolved Oxygen 6-week intervals 3-week Intervals
Electrical
Conductivity 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Fecal Coliform semi-annua1ly semi-annua11y
Fecal Streptococci semi-annually semi-annually
Iron 6-week intervals 6-week Intervals
Lead 6-week intervals 6-week intervals
Magnesium 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Mercury 6-week intervals 6-week intervals
Nitrogen-Ammonia 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Nitrogen-Organic 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Nitrogen-Nitrate 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Phosphate-total,
as P 6-week intervals
P.C.B.
Potass i urn
Sod i urn
Sol ids-Total
Dl ssolved
semi-annua11y
3-week intervals
semi-annually
6-week Intervals 6-week intervals
6-week intervals 6-week intervals
6-week intervals 3-week intervals
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
SolIds-Settleable
Total Sulphide quarterly
Sulphate quarterly
Volatile Acids 6-week intervals 6-week intervals
Zinc 6-week intervals 6-week intervals
pH 6-week Intervals 3-week intervals
quarterly
semi-annua11y
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
semi-annual 1y
semi-annually
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
semi-annually
semi-annuaI Iy
nlv If detected
n cells;
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
6-week intervals
*D.O., E.C. & pH to be run quarterly on Well k and A & E Subdratn.
159
PLATE F-5
-------
SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of Gas Sampling & Analysis
Revised Hay, 1973
Gas Probe Location Samp I ing Frequency
Cell A - Middle 6-week intervals
Cell B - Middle 6-week intervals
Cell C - Bottom 6-week intervals
Cell D - Top 6-week Intervals
Cell E - Middle 6-week Intervals
160
PLATE F-6
-------
APPENDIX G
ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES
FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF LEACHATE,
GROUNDWATER AND GAS SAMPLES FROM
SONOMA COUNTY CENTRAL DISPOSAL SITE
SANITARY LANDFILL TEST CELLS
EMCON ASSOCIATES
December 1971
Revised February 1972
Revised June 1972
Revised June 1973
Revised June 197^
Preceding page blank
162
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL
SAMPLING PROCEDURES AMD PREAKALVTICAL PREPARATION 164
Sampling Procedures 164
Sample Procurement 169
Sample Preservation 165
ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES 167
Detection Limits 167
Alkalinity 167
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 167
Calcium and Magnesium 168
Chemical Oxygen Demand 168
Chloride 169
Color 169
Dissolved Oxygen 169
Electro-Conductivity 171
Fecal Colt form 172
Fecal Streptococci 172
Gas Analysis 172
Heavy Metals 174
Nitrogen 177
Ammon la ... . . , 1 77
Organic Nitrogen " 177
Nitrate Nitrogen 178
pH Measurement 182
Phosphate (total) 182
Polychlorlrtated Blphenyls 184
Sodium and Potassium 187
Sulphate '187
Settleable Solids 187
Total Dissolved Solids 187
Total Suspended Solids •• ..,, 187
Volatile Acids 18£
BIBLIOGRAPHY 189
163
-------
GENERAL
Unless specifically noted, each analytical method Is used to determine
the specific constituent In all aqueous samples Involved In this Investigation.
The talcing, handling, and preservation of samples prior £o analysis will vary
according to the 'nature of the sample and constituent to be measured. Pre-
analytlcal preparations may require acidification, dilution, addition of a
preservative, or filtration, to name some possibilities. ;
The samples handled In this research project Include a broad range
i i
of concentrations and sample conditions. 'The analytical problems encountered
Include predicting the proper dilution ratio when samples are too concentrated,
estimating sample volumes when low concentration of a given constituent Is
expected, and changing analytical procedures or methods when Interferences
occur. It may sometimes be necessary to use several methods for the same
species, shifting the method to suit the special sample conditions.
SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND PREANALYTICAL PREPARATION
i .
i
!
S amp 11 no P rocedures
In all cases and at air times taking and handling samples should be
done In a manner which reduces to a minimum the possibilities for contamination
and at the same time reduces to a minimum the time between sampIIno and analysis.
The Importance of conducting analysis as scon after sampling has been completed
cannot be overemphasized.
Since there will be a significant time Interval, (several hours)
between sampling and analysts, the samples for certain time dependent tests
must be preserved In some manner to assure that the error due to chemical and
164
-------
biological change is held to a minimum. The methods used in this
investigation are generally accepted and widely used (1, 2).
Sample Procurement
Samples, with the exception of those obtained for bacteriological
tests, are collected in all-glass bottles with caps having
polyseal liners. The glass sample bottles are prepared for use
by cleansing with chromic acid followed by 1:1 nitric acid and
several rinses of distilled water. When sufficient sample volume
is available, the bottle is rinsed at least once with the sample
fluid before filling the bottle to overflow capacity. The samples
are then prepared according to specific preanaly t i cal procedures
described beliow.
Samples taken for bacteriological tests are collected in
125 f>1 plastic bottles with plastic caps. The bottles are pre-
pared in the laboratory beforehand by washing and sterilization
as described in Standard Methods* (page
Sample Preservation
Depending upon the test series to be run, from one to four
samples are taken from each source for chemical analysis. All
samples are stored on ice or under refrigeration at or below
1»°C until tested. A preservative, HgCl2» in a concentration
of J*0 mg/1 of sample is added to samples to be tested for the
following components:
Alkalinity Ammonia-N Sulfate
Chemical Oxygen Demand Organic-N Total Dissolved Solids
Calcium Nitrate-N Total Suspended Solids
Phosphate Settleable Solids
*Herinafter reference to Standard Methods indicates Reference 1
165
-------
DETECTION LIMITS
The detection limits listed below are the minimum detection limits
valid for normal operating procedures In the laboratory. This list Is
provided as a guide for the evaluation of the analytical procedures.
Component
Cd
Cu
Fe
Hg
K
Mg
Mn
Na
Pb
Zn
alkalinity
BOD
Ca
COD
Color
Cl
Dissolved Q£
Nitrogen - NH3
Nitrogen - Organic
Phosphorus (as P0i»)
Solids - TS
Solids - TDS
Solids - TSS
Solids - Settleable
SO/,
Volatile acids
Detection
Limit
0.05
0.02
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.01
1
5
1
1
1*
1
0,1
0.5
0.5
0.5
5
5
5
0,2
5
50
Unit
mg/1
mg/l
mg/1
ug/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 as CaCO^
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
color units
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 as N
mg/1 as N
mg/1 as P
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
ml/1
mg/1
mg/1
166
-------
ANALYTICAL METHOnS AND PROCEDURES
Alkalinity
Alkalinity Is determined by tltratlon to a mathy1 orange end
point. The sample Is diluted to 50r ml with delonI zed water to give a
reasonable tltratlon volume and sharp end point. When severe color Inter-
ferences are present, the sample Is titrated to a pH k.2 end point using
a pH meter.
Blochemlcal Oxygen Demand (BOD)
The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) determination is conducted
according to the procedure given In Standards Methods (page 48$). The
direct plpetlng or dilution method Is selected for preparing BOD samples based
upon the estimated ultimate 5~day BOD.
For samples containing unknown BOD strengths It Is necessary to
prepare a range of dilutions so that the actual value will be bracketed.
Generally three dilutions are required to assure adequate coverage of
range. If the BOD can be reasonably estimated, the range of dilutions can
be narrowed somewhat, but I t Is usually best to take a conservative approach.
The following table will aid In preparing dilutions:
ESTIMATED BOD DILUTIONS*
.Sample Volume..* ml Range of BOD Expected
(added to 30Q ml bottle) mg/1
0.05 12,000 - 42,000
0.10 6,000 - 20,000
0020 3,000 - 10,000
0.50 1,200 - 4,200
1.0 600 - 2,000
2.0 300 - 1,000
5.0 100 - 400
10,0 60 - 200
20.0 30 - 100
50.0 10 - 40
ion.n 5 - 20
300.0 0 - 7
* Modified and shortened from Sawyer & McCarty, Chemistry for Sanitary
Engineers. Mefiraw-HII1. 2nd ed., 1967. p 403.~~~~~
167
-------
Calcl urn, and Maoneslurn
The concentration of calcium Is determined by eomplexometrlc
tFtratlon with EDTA with hydroxy napthol blue Indicator. There Is a
strong possibility of Interference from dissolved heavy metals (e.g., CU,
Zn, Nl, Fe, Pb). This Interference (s overcome by complexlng the metals
with cyanide*. Routine addition of sodium cyanide solution Is utilized
to prevent potential metallic Interference. The procedure Is described In
Standard Methods (page 181). When sample volumes do not permit tltratlon
techniques, Atomic Absorption Speetrophbtometry (AAS)'should be used to
conserve the sample volume for measurement of other parameters. The methods
described In Standard Methods (page 211} and elsewhere10 can be used. Where
highly colored leaehate samples are obtained It may be necessary to
analyze Ca and Mg by AAS to avoid color Interferences with the EDTA method.
Mg Is routinely determined by AAS but In certain favorable eases may be
done by EDTA tltratlon.
C he m Ica 1 0 xygen Deman d (COD)
The dtchromate reflux method, Standard Methods (page 495), has been
selected for the chemical oxygen demand (GOD) determination because It has
advantages over other oxtdants In oxldlzablllty, applicability to a wide
variety of samples, and ease of manipulation. The sample and reagent
volumes used are 20 ml aliquot of sample, 10 ml of .25N K? Cr£ Oy and 30 ml
of H£ SOlj containing Ae^SO^. The maximum COD concentration which can be
determined using the 20 ml aliquot sample is 2000 mg/1\ for COD concentrations
greater than 2000 mg/1, smaller volumes of sample diluted up to 20 ml with
distilled water should be used. The sample is diluted to give reasonable
tftrattbn volumes and to assure complete sample oxidation.
The standard ferrous ammonium sulfate tttrant Is approximately
0.10N, and Is standardized with each run. When data indicate a COD
consistently below 500 mg/1, the normal procedure described In Standard
Methods (page 495) Is to be employed.
*CAUTION» Cyanide Is a strong poison and great care should be exercised
when handling.
168
-------
Chiori de
Because of the interferences expected in leachate samples,
the method used for chloride analysis is the Mercuric Nitrate
procedure. It is expected that orthophosphate, sulfide, and
sulfite ions will be in sufficient concentrations so as to inter-
fere with the Argentoroetric titration technique. The procedure
as outlined in Standard Methods (page 97) is used. The presence of
sulfites interferes. If the presence is suspected, oxidize by
treating 50 ml sample with 0.5 to 1.0 ml of 30 percent H202- This
method is used for both leachate and groundwater samples.
Color
Color is measured according to the Platinum-Cobalt method
described in Standard Methods (page 160). Because of the highly
colored, complex character of leachate, this test is no longer
pe rformed.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
Most leachate samples are highly colored and it is therefore
not possible to use the Winkler Method of analysis. A field oxygen
probe is used for in-situ measurement of oxygen in both leachate
and groundwater samples.
Dissolved oxygen is measured in the field using a battery
operated Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Model 51A Dissolved
Oxygen Meter. The instrument is equipped with a combination
temperature, oxygen probe. Temperature can be read to 0.3° C
and dissolved oxygen can be read to 0.1 ppm.
Below is a detailed description for use by field personnel who
will be making the in-situ DO measurements:
1. Calibration of DO meter.
a. Check the probe to assure the membrane is not damaged.
Should the membrane be damaged, it can be replaced
following the procedures outlined under "Preparation
for Operation" in the instruction manual.
169
-------
b. Connect the probe cables to the instrument. The
oxygen-temperature probes have two connectors of
different sizes so they cannot be incorrectly attached
to the instrument.
c. With the instrument OFF check mechanical zero of meter
and adjust if necessary with the screwdriver adjust-
ment in the lower center of the meter bezel. Perform
the adjustment with the instrument in the position
it will be used.
d. Turn the selector switch to ZERO and adjust the meter
to zero with ZERO adjustment knob.
e. Turn the selector switch to FULL SCALE and adjust the
meter to the full scale position (15 ppm on the
meter). If the meter cannot be adjusted to full
scale, replace the batteries.
f. Set the selector switch to CALIB Q£ with theprobe in
an environment of 100 percent relative humidity.
This can be accomplished by placing the probe in the
storage container partially filled with water, taking
care that the membrane is not immersed. Leave the
probe in this position for a period of 5 minutes
to polarize it before making further calibrations
or measurements.
g. With the CALIB knob, set the meter pointer to the
mark for the local altitude.
Measurement of Sample DO Content.
a. Calibrate DO meter as outlined in calibration proce-
dures.
b. Place the probe in the water sample at the measure-
ment site. To induce a flow of water across the
membrane, raise and lower the probe.
c. Turn the selector switch to TEMP and read the tempera-
ture from the lower meter scale. Record temperature.
170
-------
d. Set the 02 SOLUBILITY FACTOR dial to the observed
temperature, taking care to use the appropriate
salinity index (each section of the bar on the 02
SOLUBILITY FACTOR dial represents 5,000 ppm chloride
concentration.). Previous analytical data on chloride
concentration should be used to estimate appropriate
salinity index setting.
e. Turn the switch to 02 and read the dissolved oxygen
value in ppm directly from the raeter dial. Record
dissolved oxygen value.
f. To perform a series of measurements in a short time
at about the same temperature (within 5° C of calibra-
tion temperature), reca1ibrat ion is not required and
performance will not be degraded. To take readings,
simply repeat steps b, c, d, and e,
Electro-Conductivity (EC)
E1ectro-conductivity is measured in the field using a battery
operated Beckman, Type RB3, Solu Bridge. The instrument is
equipped with three conductivity probe cells which provide a
measurement range of from 50 to 200,000 micro-mhos/cm.
Below is a detailed description for use by field personnel who
perform the in-situ E. C. measurements:
1. Check the battery by depressing the battery check switch
and the ON-OFF button simultaneously. The needle of the
battery check meter should deflect to the right (positive)
and come to rest in the green zone.
2. Set the manual temperature compensator to the solution
. temperature as measured by a thermometer or the reading
from the D. 0. meter. Record the temperature of the
sample.
3. Immerse the conductivity probe cell in the solution to be
tested to a point at least one-half inch above the cell
air vent. Move the cell up and down in the solution once
or twice to insure removal of air bubbles from within the
cell .
171
-------
i». While depressing the ON-OFF button, rotate the main scale
knob until the meter needle is opposite zero on the
scale. Release the button.
5. Read the scale value opposite the index mark on the
main scale knob. Determine the electro-conductivity by
applying the appropfiate conductivity probe cell factor to
the scale value. Record electro conductivity.
6. Instrument calibration is carried out in the laboratory
utilizing solutions described in Standard Methods (p.
325).
7. Clean the probe by rinsing with tap water several times.
Probes should be stored in distilled water when not in
use.
Fecal Coli form
The multiple tube dilution technique is used for the Fecal
Coliform Test. Lactose broth is used for the presumptive test.
The confirmed test utilizes the boric acid lactose broth. Details
are given in Standard Methods (page 669). Data are reported as
Most Probable Number (MPN) per 100 ml with a 35% confidence limit.
Fecal Streptococci
The Multiple-Tube Technique is used for Fecal Streptococci ;
analysis. The Membrane Filter Technique could be used equally
well. The procedure used for the presumptive test, confirmed
test, and for computing and recording the MPN per 100 ml of the
samples is given in Standard Methods (page 689).
Gas Ana 1 ys i.s
Gas samples from the landfill cells are collected in the
field and are analyzed in the laboratory using gas-solid partition
chromatography. The system will separate and detect C02, H2,
N£, Q£ and CH/,. The presence or absence of H2S is also checked.
Sampling Procedure; Gas samples are collected in the field
in 250 ml glass gas sampling tubes. The principle is to draw
the gas sample into and through the sample tube under a vacuum
172
-------
and to seal the container when a representative sample has been
collected. Procedure for collection of gas samples is as follows:
1. Connect tubing from gas probe to gas sample tube inlet.
2. Connect the suction end of the field gas analyzer to gas
sample t ube out let.
3. Open stopcocks on both ends of gas sampling tube.
k. Switch on field gas analyzer and draw sample through
gas sample tube into gas analyzer until parts per million
reading remains fairly constant, but for not less than
one minute. (Pumping rate is approximately 1^00 ml/min.)
5. .Close sample tube outlet stopcock.
6. Close sample tube inlet stopcock.
7. Disconnect the gas sample tube outlet from the field gas
analyzer.
8. Connect the hand vacuum pump to the gas sample tube outlet
9. Open the stopcock at the outlet of the gas sample tube.
10. Pump with the hand vacuum pump for 20 repetitions (equal
to approximately 26" of Mercury pressure) to evacuate
the sample tube.
11. Close the stopcock at the outlet of the gas sample tube.
12. Reconnect and switch on the field gas analyzer.
13. Open the inlet stopcock, then the outlet stopcock of the
gas s amp 1e t ube.
\k. Continue pumping for 30 seconds.
15. Close sample tube outlet stopcock.
16. Close sample tube inlet stopcock.
17. Disconnect gas sample tube from gas probe and field gas
analyzer. Care should be taken not to disturb either
stopcock while transporting and handling the gas sample
tube. Record on the gas sample tube the container number,
sampling location, and date.
173
-------
CONNECT TO GAS SAMPLE
GAS
'ROBE— 7- TUBE—r
*^ r-B-' * '
^-INLET
STOPCOCK
- T
-^OUTLET
STOPCOCK
GAS
ANALYZER
Heavy Metals
Analysis for five heavy metals (Hg, Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd) is done
by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd are
run by the normal flame method as described in Standard Methods
(page 417).
Mercury is analyzed for by the flameless atomic absorption
technique similar to that prescribed by EPA Methods* (page 121).
Additional information on this technique is available (6, 7).
Details of the analytical procedure are presented below:
Total Mercury Analysis
The following method for the determination of Mercury in
solution employs a preanalytical acid oxidation procedure followed
by a simple reduction aeration procedure to produce and introduce
elemental mercury vapor into a flow-through system where absorption
at 253.7 nm is measured in a quartz-windowed cell. This method
applies to both groundwater and leachate samples, although the
sample volume may have to be increased for the groundwater samples.
The range of the method may be varied through instrument and/
or recorder expansion. Using a 25 ml sample, a detection limit
of 1.0 i|Hg/l can be maintained. Concentrations below this level
should be reported as 1.0.
1. Acid Oxidation Procedure
a) Place a sample aliquot of 50 ml into a 500 ml. volumetric
flask. Add 10 ml concentrated, redistilled HN03, co°l and
174
-------
then add 15 ml of cone. t^SO^. Because of the potential
for loss of Hg by volatilization, the sample must not
be allowed to become hot. Stopper the flasks and allow
to stand for 2k hours.
b) Add 25 ml of KMnOj| to each sample. If the color persists
for at least one hour the oxidation can be considered
complete. I f the color dissipates in less than 30 minutes,
add KMnOjf in 5 ml aliquots until the color persists. It
is important that aliquot oxidation be carried to completion,
as unoxidized surfactants will foam, resulting in a poor
analysis.
c) Add 10 ml of 5% persulfate solution to each aliquot and
allow to stand at least several hours to overnight.
Before diluting to volume, discharge the color using
hydroxy1 amine solution. When sample is ready for analysis
i t shouId be c1ea r.
d) Make up to volume.
2. Analytical Procedure
a) Transfer the sample to the gas washing bottle. The method
calls for the removal of 100 ml aliquots of both standards
and sample; however, larger or smaller volumes may be
utilized with suitab1e correction factors applied. Add
teflon stirring bar and stir at moderate speed.
b) Add 4 ml stannous chloride, wait 5-10 seconds for complete
mixing and insert the aerator. The recorder should register
a peak reaching maximum height in approximately 1-3
seconds. When the maximum peak height has been obtained,
remove the aerator and insert in another washing bottle
containing 5 ml of 7 N HN03 in 100 ml distilled water.
The recorder should return to zero as the eluted mercury
is driven from the cell.
3. Ca1i brat i on
Standards, including a blank are treated in a similar manner
as the samples. Standards commonly employed are 0.0, 0.05,
0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ^ig/100 ml.
175
-------
k. Calculat ion
Percent absorption is read from the chart and converted to
absorbance. Absorbance is plotted vs. ug Hg, which should
give a linear curve. Sample values are derived from the
result i ng graph.
mg Hg/1 * final dilution volume x ^g Hg in aliquot
samplesTzealiquot size
for a 50 ml sample diluted to 500 ml with 100 ml aliquot
taken :
mg Hg/1 = flg Hg in aliquot
10
for 200 ml:
mg Hg/1 = jug Hg
20
Reagents
a) HNOj: redistilled, cone., stored in pyrex
HC1: redistilled, cone., stored in pyrex
H^SOij: cone., stored in pyres or high density polyethlene
b) Diluting water: must be known to be Hg free; if it is not,
appropriate measures must be taken to assure adequate quality
water.
c) Stannous chloride: 10$ w/v in 1:1 HC1. Dissolve 50 g of
.SnCl2 in 250 ml of cone. HC1 then dilute to 500 ml.
This should be purged with air for several hours before
use to remove any residual mercury.
d) Sodium chloride: 30% w/v solution
e) Hydroxy1 amine hydrochloride: 25$ w/v solution
f) Sodium chloride - hydroxly1 amine: dilute 60 ml of 25$
hydroxy1amine HC1 and 50 ml of NaCl to 500 ml.
g) Potassium permanganate: 5$ w/v (Saturated solution)
h) Potassium persulfate: 5$ w/v saturated solution, store in
cool, dark place. Solution stable for limited period of
t i me.
176
-------
5. Apparatus
a. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotoroeter. Any atomic absorption
unit which is capable of accommodating the cold vapor
cell. Instrument settings recommended by the manufacturer
should be followed.
b. Hg Hollow Cathode Lamp.
c. Recorder. Any multi-range variable speed strip chart
recorder campatible with the UV detection system in use.
d. Cold Vapor Absorption Ce11. Suitable cells may be constructed
from standard spectrophotometric 10 mm cells having
quartz end window or may be constructed from plexiglass
tubing making sure to use quartz end windows that are
perpendicular to the line of light. See Reference 1,
6 or 7 for exact details.
Mi t rogen
Ammoni a. The preliminary distillation method is used for
ammonia as described in Standard Methods (page 229). The distilla-
tion method covers the determination of ammonia-nitrogen exclusive
of total Kjeldahl nitrogen. This method covers the range from
about 1.0 to 25 mg/1 when the titrometric end point is used.
Since most leachate samples will contain NHj-N in the range 100-600
mg/1, it will be necessary to use small sample volumes (20-^00
ml) and dilute with ammonia-free distilled water up to 50 ml.
0 rgan i c N i t rogen. Organic Kjeldahl nitrogen is defined as the
nitrogen converted to ammonia from nitrogen components of biological
origin such as amino acids, proteins and peptides, but may hot
include the nitrogenous compounds such as amines, nitro compounds,
hydrazones, oximes, semi-carbazones and refractory tertiary amines.
Organic Kjeldahl nitrogen is determined after distillation of
free ammonia from the sample. The method used is described in the
EPA Methods (page 1^9) and is similar except for minor details to
the procedure detailed in Standard Methods (page
177
-------
N i t rate N i t rogen. The Bructne Method employed for the measure-
ment of nitrate nitrogen is described in EPA Methods (page 170).
This method is based upon the reaction of the nitrate ion with
brucine sulfate* in a 13N h^SO^ solution at a temperature of
100° c. The color of the resulting complex is measured at AlO
nm. Temperature control of the color reaction is extremely critica
Details of the analytical procedure are presented below:
Brucine Method
This method is applicable to the analysis in both groundwater
and leachate samples. Modification can be made to remove or
correct for turbidity, color, salinity, or dissolved organic
compounds in samples. The range of the method is 0.1 to 2
mg/1 N03-N.
Samples may be preserved for several days by the addition of
40 mg/1 HgCl2 and storage at 4°C. Analysis should not be delayed
more than a week.
1. Points to Note.
a. Dissolved organic matter will cause an off color in
13NH2SOi| and must be compensated for by additions
of all reagents except the brucine-su1fani1 ic acid
reagent. This also applies to natural color present
not due to dissolved organics.
b. The effect of salinity is eliminated by addition of
sodium chloride to the blanks, standards, and samples.
c. Ferrous and ferric iron and quadrivalent manganese
give slight positive interference. In concentrations
less than 1 mg/1 these are negligible.
d. All strong oxidizing or reducing agents interfere.
The presence of oxidizing agents may be determined
by the addition of orthotolidine reagent.
* 6 rue i ne S ulfate is toxic; reagent bottle should be marked with
warning.
178
-------
e. Uneven heating of the samples and standards during
the reaction time will result in erratic values.
The necessity for absolute control of temperature
during the critical color development period cannot
be too strongly emphasized.
Ana 1ytica1 P rocedure
a. Adjust the pH of the samples to approximately pH 7
with 1:3 acedir acid and, if necessary, filter through
a 0.^5 }A pore size filter.
b. Set up the required number of matched tubes in the
rack to handle reagent blank, standards and samples.
It is suggested that tubes be spaced evenly throughout
the rack to allow for even flow of bath water between
the tubes. Even spacing of tubes should assist in
achieving uniform heating of all tubes.
c. If it is necessary to correct for color or dissolved
organic matter which will cause color on heating, a
set of duplicate tubes must be used to which all
reagents except the brucine-sulfani1ic acid has been
added.
d. Pipette 10.0 ml or an aliquot of the samples diluted
to 10.0 ml into the sample tubes.
e. If the samples have high dissolved solids, add 2 ml
of the 30 percent sodium chloride solution to the
reagent blank, standards, and samples. For ground-
water samples, sodium chloride solution may be
omitted. Mix contents of tubes by swirling and place
rack in cold water bath (0-10°C).
f. Pipette 10.0 ml of sulfuric acid solution into each
tube and mix by swirling. Allow tubes to come to
thermal equilibrium in the cold bath. Be sure that
temperatures have equilibrated in all tubes before
con 11n ui ng.
179
-------
g. Add 0.5 ml brucine-sulfani1ic acid reagent to each
tube (except the interference control tubes) and
carefully mix by swirling, then place the rack of
tubes in the boiling water bath for exactly 25
minutes.
CAUTI ON; Immersion of the tube rack into the bath
should not decrease the temperature of the bath more
than 1° to 2° C. Flow of bath water between the
tubes should not be restricted by crowding too many
tubes into the rack, in order to keep this temperature
decrease to an absolute minimum. If color develop-
ment in the standards reveals discrepancies in the
procedure, the operator should repeat the procedure
after reviewing the temperature control steps.
h. Remove rack of tubes from the hot water bath and
immerse in the cold water bath and allow to reach
thermal equilibrium (20-25°C.).
i
i. Dry tubes and read absorbance against the reagent
b 1 ank at 410 nm.
3. Ca1culat ion
a. Obtain a standard curve by plotting the absorbance
of standards run by the above procedure against mg
N03~N. (The color reaction does not always follow
Bee r ' s 1 aw).
b. Subtract the absorbance of the sample without the
brucine-sulfani1ic reagent from the absorbance of
the sample containing brucine-su1fani1ic acid and
read the absorbance in mg NO^-N. Convert mg per
aliquot of sample to mg per 1 iter.
k. Reagents
a. Distilled water free of nitrite and nitrate is to be
used in preparation of all reagents and standards.
180
-------
b. Sodium chloride solution (300 g/1). Dissolve 300
g NcCl In distilled water and dilute to 1.0 1.
c. Sulfuric acid solution. Carefully add 500 ml
(sp. gr. 1.8M to 125 ml distilled water. Cool and
keep tightly stoppered to prevent absorption of
atmospheric moisture.
d. Brucine-sulfan I 1ic acid reagent. Dissolve 1 g
brucine sulfate ^23^^20^) 2 • H2SOi4 • 7H20 and 0.1
g sulfanilic acid (NH2C6H/jS03H. H20) in 70 ml hot
distilled water. Add 3 ml concentrated HC1, cool,
mix and dilute to 100 ml. Store In a dark bottle at
5°C. This solution is stable for several months;
the pink color that develops does not effept Its
usefulness. Hark bottle with warning: CAUTI ON;
Brucine Sulfate ts toxic; take care to avoid ingest ion
e. Potassium nitrate stock solution (l ml = 0.1 mg
N03~N). Dissolve 0.7218 g anhydrous potassium
nitrate (KNOj) in distilled water and dilute to 1
1Iter.
f. Potassium nitrate standard solution (1 ml = 0.001
mg N03-N). Dilute 10.0 ml of the stock solution to
1 liter. This standard solution should be prepared
fresh week 1y.
g. Acetic acid (1+3). Dilute 1 vol. glacial acetic
acid (CH3COOH) with 3 volumes of distilled water.
5. Apparatus
a. Spectrophotometer or filter photometer suitable for
measuring absorbance at k 10 nm and capable of
accommodating 25 mm diameter cells.
b. Sufficient number of 25 mm diameter matched tubes
for reagent blanks, standards, and samples.
c. Neoprene coated wire racks to hold 25 mm drameter
t ubes.
181
-------
d. Water bath suitable for use at 100°C. This bath
should contain a stirring rrechanism so that all tubes
arei.at same temperature and should be of sufficient
capacity to accept the required number of tubes
without sIgnificant drop in temperature when the
tubes are immersed.
e. Water bath suitable for use at 10-15°C.
Measurement of pH
pH is measured in the field using a battery operated Beckman
Electromate pH Meter. The instrument is equipped with s combination
electrode and normal operating procedures will assure a precision
of +_ 0. 1 pH un i t.
The following is a detailed description of test procedures
for use by field personnel who will be making the in-situ pH
measurements. It is important that explicit care be taken to
assure as great an accuracy and precision as can be maintained since
field measurements are unduly subject to possible error.
1. Calib ration of pH meter and electrode.
1 •*••
a. Check the battery power supply to assure adequate power.
b. Check to make sure that the pH meter is in the proper
operating mode. Turn function switch to STANDBY,
temperature compensation to the temperature of samples
and buffers.
c. Be sure that the samples and buffers are at the same
tempera'ture before calibrating instrument.
d. Rinse off- electrode with distilled water and dry gently
with so ft tissuepaper.
e. Place the combination electrode into the buffer
solution pH 7. Turn function switch to pH and after
several minutes adjust the meter reading to the pH of
the buffer solution by using the "standardize" dial.
f. Turn function switch to STANDBY. Remove combination
el ect-rodet f rom buffer solution, rinse with distilled
water, and dry.
182
-------
g. Repeat e. and f. for buffer of pH k.
2. Measurement of Sample pH.
a. Use of the combination electrode allows measurement of pH in
small beakers. Use a clean 50 ml or 100 ml beaker. Insert
the combination electrode in sample. The electrode mus t not
touch the sides or bottom of the beaker. Turn function switch
to pH. Slowly rotate the beaker several times to insure
good contact of sample and electrode. When meter reading
has been stabilized, record pH.
b. Turn function switch to STANDBY and remove electrode Rinse
electrode with distilled water and dry carefully with soft
t i ss ue.
c. Repeat procedure for each sample.
3. Storage and care of combination electrode.
a. The salt solution in the reference part of the electrode
should be topped off occasionally to assure an adequate
1 eve 1 is ma i n ta i ned.
b. The rubber sleeve should be kept over the fill hole
except when equilibrating pressure or filling with salt
s o r u t i o n .
c. The electrode should be stored in a manner that keeps the
electrode tip wet at all times.
Phosphate - Total
Digestion of Raw Sample: The sulfuric acid - nitric acid digestion
method will be used to prepare samples for analysis of total
phosphate. The method follows the description in Standard Methods
(page 525). Additional information on this digestion method can be
o
found elsewhere.
When necessary, the persulfate digestion method, Standard
Methods (page 526), will be used in lieu of the above.
Analytical Method: The vandomolybdo-phosphoric acid
colorimetric method described In Standard Methods (page 527) is
applicable to the measurement of total phosphate in the leachate
samples. Arsenates interfere with the analysis above 0.05 mg/1 arsenic.
This method for total phosphate is adequate for the full range of
0.03 to 2.0 mg/1 as P.
When necessary, the above specified analytical method will be
replaced by the ascorbic acid - molybdate method, Standard
Methods (page 532).
183
-------
Polychortnated Blphenyls (PCB)
Since the chlorinated compounds are generally quite surface
active, most of the PCB is expected to be on the suspended material.
The suspended matter, after separation on a glass fiber disc, is
extracted by agitation in 1:1 acetone:acetonitrite. Chlorinated
pesticides are partitioned into petroleum ether after the addition
of a weak salt solution. The extract is cleaned up on florisil
before gas-liquid chromatography detection of the chlorinated
materi als.
This method is suitable for aqueous samples with or without
large amounts of suspended matter. The detection limit is 10 nano-
grams per liter of sample. Therefore tt is very important that
extraordinary cleanliness be maintained to avoid contamination.
Analytical Method
Samples containing 1 gm/1 or more suspended matter must be
filtered (Section 1) and the filtrate and suspended matter analyzed
separately as discussed in Section 3 (water) and Section 2
(sediment). Samples having less than 1 gm/1 suspended material
can be analyzed as a whole sample according to Section 3.
1. Filtration of Heavi1y Se%?men ted Samp 1es
a. Place a 7 cm. Whatman GF/B filter pad (or equivalent)
in a porcelain Buchner funnel and prewash with 50
s ml distilled petroleum ether. Discard the washings.
b. Measure out 1 liter of homogeneous sample and filter
us i ng s uct i on.
c. Transfer the filtrate to a 2 liter separatory funnel
and proceed according to Section 3.
d. Transfer the filter pad to a 600 ml beaker with
clean forceps and proceed according to Section 2.
2. Extraction Procedure for Sediment Fraction
a. Add 100 ml of 1:1 acetonitri1e:acetone and 50 ml
distilled water to beaker containing the filter pads.
Allow contact for more than 2 hours with occasional
st i rring.
b. After 2 hours remove the sediment from the filter pad
by mascerating the pad with two clean glass stirring rods.
c. Allow the sediment to settle and decant the clear
supernatant using the stirring rods to hold back the glass
filter fibers. Decant into 1000 ml of distilled water in
a 2 liter separatory funnel.
184
-------
d. Repeat the partittoning-with two addftional 50. ml
portions of 1:1 acetonitri1e:acetone, each time allowing the
sample to soak for more than one hour with occasional
swirling. Decant the clear supernatant into the
separatory funnel. This should bring the total volume
up to 200 ml of extractant.
e. Add 30 gm Na2SOi< and extract two times with 150 ml
petroleum ether, each time washing the petroleum
ether twice with 100 ml distilled water which is
added to the rest of the aqueous sample. (This is
done to wash acetonitrile and acetone o.ut of the
petroleum ether so they will not interfere with the
floriisil cleanup.) If heavy emulsion occurs at this
point, as it may with dirty samples, include the
emulsion with the aqueous phase each time and par-
tition a third time with 150 ml petroleum ether.
f. Carry through with evaporation, florisil cleanup
and detection as described in Section3 for aqueous
sa.mpl es .
3. E x t r a c t i 6 n P r o ce d u re f o r Aq u'e'o'u s Fraction
a. Add 150 ml of redistilled }5% diethyl ether in petro-
leum ether to the sample. Shake vigorously for 3
minutes. Settle for at least 10 minutes.
b. Draw off and save the aqueous phase.
c. Swirl the organic phase to dislodge water from the
s i des of the funnel.
d. Draw the organic phase into a clean 600 ml beaker.
e. Return the aqueous phase to the separatory funnel
and repeat steps a-d with another 150 ml 15$ ethyl
ether in petroleum ether.
f. Repeat steps a-d with 150 ml petroleum ether (no
ethy1 ether).
185
-------
g. Prepare a large funnel with a small cotton plug and
2 teaspoons of Na2SOj,. Wash this with 50 ml petro-
leum ether.
h. Pour the sample through Na2SOit to dry it and catch
the sample in a clean 600 ml beaker.
i. Follow the sample with another 25 ml petroleum
ether to wash the Na2S04 and catch this washing in
the beaker containing the sample.
j. Place the sample beaker in a k5°C water bath and
evaporate to about 25 ml volume (about 2 hours).
This evaporation can also be accomplished in a K-D
evaporator.
k. Prepare a 4-lnch florisil column and prewash with 50
ml petroleum ether. Discard the washing,
1. Follow the prewash with the sample. Add 150 ml of
]% (V/V) ethyl ether in petroleum ether and then 150
ml of 201 (V/V) ethyl ether in petroleum ether.
m. Add 100 micro!iters of distilled xylene to each
elut rIated volume.
n. Evaporate the collected volume to about 1 ml volume
in a K-D evaporator.
o. Cool the evaporator under a cold water stream and
wash down the large flask with the condensed solvent.
p. Reduce the sample down to an injectable quantity as
rapidly as possible in a i»5°C water bath. Thoroughly
mix the contents before GLC detection.
q. Initial detection is done by GLC using 3& OV-1 and
the Nicher-63 electron capture dector. Confirmation
of positive amounts of chlorinated hydrocarbons is
first done on 3$ OV-17 using a Coulson electrolytic
i conductivity halide specific detector and then on
5% OV-17 plus 2% QF-1 using a Dohrmann micro-coulometr5c
chloride specific detector.
186
-------
Sodium and Potassium
The preferred method of analysis for sodium and potassium
utilizes the flame photometer technique. Standard analytical
procedures are followed as described in Standard Methods (page
317 and 283) .
Satisfactory results can also be achieved by Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotoraetry.
Sulfate
Sulfate is determined by a gravimetric method utilizing preci-
pitation; with barium chloride, forming a barium sulfate solid.
The filtered precipitate is ignited at 800°C for 1 hour prior to
ji •
cooling and weighing. This method is used for both leachate and
groundwater samples. Care must be taken with leachate samples
to avoid error caused by precipitation of barium chloride during
the sulfate analysis. The gravimetric method is described in
detail in Standard Methods (page 331).
Settleable Sol ids
Settleable matter is determined according to the procedure
given in Standard Methods (page 539) using the trahoff cone.
Total Dissolved Sol ids (TDS)
Total dissolved solids is determined according to the proce-
dure described in Standard Methods (page 290). There may be a
significant dissolved organic fractton.present in the leachate
samples so that correspondence between specific conductance and
TDS may be different from that of the groundwater samples.
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
The analytical procedure employed for determining suspended
solids was originally described by Wycoff (M. Suspended solids
are determined by leachate filtration through a glass fiber filler
pad. The initial weight of each pad is determined before filtra-
tion. Following filtration, the pads are dried for one hour at
187
-------
103°C and then weighed. The glass pads are weighed again after
being ignited for 10 mtnutes at 600°C ff the volatile fraction
is to be determined. The method utilized is described in Standard
Methods (page 537)
Volati1e Aci ds
Volatile acids (total organic acids) is measured by the
column-partition chromatographic method as given in Standard
Methods (page 577). Special precautfon should be exercised in
maintaining the normality of the standard sodium hydroxide
titrant by excludfng C02 from the reagent bottle.
188
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. APHA, Standard Methods for the 'Exart t nation of Water and Waste-
water. 13th ecL , 1971 . '
2. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Qua 1ity 0ffice ,
Analytical Quality Control Laboratory, Methods for Chemical
Analysis of Water and Wastes, 1971.
3. Steiner, R, L. and A. A. Fungaroli, "Analytical Procedures
for Chemical Pollutants: Research Project on Pollution of
Subsurface Water by Sanitary Landfill", Report SWUE-12,
Drexel University (no date).
1*. Wychoff, B. M. , "Rapid Solids Determination Using Glass Fiber
Filters", Water and Sewage Works , 111, 277, 1964.
ji
5. Mancy, K. H. and T. Jaffe, "Analysis of Dissolved Oxygen in
Natural and Wastewaters:, USPHS Publication 999-WP-37, 1966.
6. Hatch, W. R. and W. L. Ott, "Determination of Sub-Microgram
Quantities of Mercury by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry",
Analytical Chemistry. *0, 2085, 1968.
7. Brandenberger, H. and H. Bader, "The Determination of Nano-
gram Levels of Mercury in Solution by a Flameless Atomic
Absorption Technique", Atomic Absorption News 1etter,6, 101,
1967.
8. Menzel, D. W. and N. Corwin, "The Measurement of Total Phos-
phorus in Seawater Based on the Liberation of Organically
Bound Fractions by Persulfate Oxidation", Limnol. Oceanogr,
10, 28, 1965.
9. Sawyer, C. N. and P. L. McCarty, Chemistry for Sanitary Engineers,
2nd ed. , McGraw-Hi11 , 1967.
10. Fishman, M. J. and S. C. Downs /Methods • • for - Anal ys i s of
Selected Metals in Water by AtomTc Absorption,USGS Water
Supply Paper 15^0-C, 1966.
11. Mancy, K. H., Instrumenta 1 Ana 1ysis for Water Pollution
Control , Ann Arbor Science Publication, 1971.
12. Skoog, D. A. and D. M. West, Fundamentals of Analytical
Chemi st ry, 2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Windston, 1970.
13- Lingane, J. J., E 1 ect roan a 1 y t ? c'a'l Chemistry,2nd ed.,
I n terscience , 1 958".
189
-------
APPtND i X H
MONITOREO
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE
PLATE NO.,
Thermistor Readings
Gas Probe Readings
Laboratory Gas Analysis - Cell A & B
Laboratory Gas Analysis - Cell C & D
Laboratory Gas Analysis - Ceil E
Leachate Analysis - Cell A
Leachate Analysis - Cell B
Leachate Analysis - Cell C
Leachate Analysis - Cell D
Leachate Analysis - Cell E
Water Analysis - Water Added to
CelIs B R C
Groundwater Analysis - Well 1
Groundwater Analysis - Well 2
Groundwater Analysis - Well 3
Groundwater Analysis - Well k
Groundwater Analysis - Original
Geotechnical Investigation
Cel1 A & E Subdrain
Observation Wells and Piezometers
Cumulative Leachate Production
Cumulative Leachate Production
Lysiraeter Samples - Field Analysts
Solution Analysis
Record of Rainfall, Evaporation and
Runoff
Sett 1ement Data
Fluid Routing - Cell C
Fluid Routing - Cell D
H-1A, IB, 1C
t
H-2A, 2B (Discontinued)
H-3A, 3B, 3C
H-4A, 1»B, AC
H-5A, 5B
H-6A, 6B, 6C, 6D
H-7A, 7B, 7C, 7D
H-8A -8L
H-9A.-9K
H-10A - 10E
H-l1A - 1 IE
H-12A - 12E
H-13A - 13E
H-H»A - UE
H-15A, 15B, 15C, 15D
H-16A
H-17A, 17B, 17C, 17D
H-18A
H-19A, 19B, 19C, 19D
H-20A (Discontinued)
H-21A
H-22A (See Table 1l)
H-23A- 23FF
H-2AA - 2kl
H-25A - 25K
H-26A - 26K
191
-------
THERMISTER READINGS
DATE TIKE AIR
TEMP.
1971
11-8 PM 25. B
11-10 AM 24.5
PM 22.3
11-11 AM
11-12 AM
11-14 AM 9.1
PM ' -
11-15 AM 9.8
11-16 AM 13.2
PM 21. 4
11-17 AM 7.0
PM 20.3
11-18 AM 13.5
PM 20.1
11-19 AM 9.7
PM 17.5
11-22 AM 7.2
PM 17.5
11-23 AM 10.0
PM 12.0
11-24 AM 10.5
PM 10.0
11-29 AM
11-30 AM 6.1»
PM 21.0
12-1 AM 10.1
12-2 AM 7.5
PM 7.5
12-3 AM 6.7
12-6 AM 15.0
PM 18.1
12-7 AM 12.5
12-8 PM 15. i»
12-9 AM 12.1
12-10 AM 15.0
CELL A
Tempantur* °C
Bot. Mid. Top
17.1 -
26.6 19.1
26.8 26.6
27.8 27.5
29.6 27. S
25.1 29.5 18.5
24.8 29.2 19.1
2U.2 28. 4 27.6
22.4 28. 4 42.5
22.6 28.2 43.9
22.5 27.9 35.7
22.3 27.9 33."*
22.3 27.5 28.6
22.3 27.5 27.7
22.2 27.7 26.1
22.2 27.6 25.8
21.9 27.1 24.0
21.9 27.1 24.0
21.8 27.0 24.0
21.8 27.0 23.9
21.8 27.0 23.9
21.8 26.9 23.5
21.7 26.4 23.2
21.6 26.3 21.9
21.6 26.3 21.9
21.7 26.5 21.7
21.6 26.2 21.4
21.5 26.1 21.2
21.6 26.0 21.3
21.4 26.1 19.9
21.4 25.8 19.7
21.4 25.8 19.1
21.4 25.6 18.8
21.6 25.6 18.3
21.4 25.5 17.8
CELL B
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
18.1
.
22.6 13.8
22.8 19.4
22.4 25.5
22.6 25.6
23.2 26.6
23.2 27.4
23.4 28.9
23.4 29.1
23.9 34.4
24.1 35.1
24.2 35.2
24.4 35.5
24.7 35.7 20.6
24.6 35.7 22.2
24.5 35.6 21.0
25.7 34.8 19.7
25.7 34.7 20.9
25.9 34.4 21.7
29.3 33.1 21.7
29.7 32.9 22.7
30.5 32.7 22.6
CELL C
Temperature C
Bot. Nld. Top
CELL D
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
CELL E
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Toe
18.2
22.5
24.5
30.7
22.7
24.5
25.2
30.7 19.6
31.0 19.9
31.4 -
31.3 20.1
31.5 20.3
31.3 20.6
29.3 26.2
29.0 26.1
28.9 27.1
28.9 27.8
28.6 28.8
28.5 28.9
28.5 28.7
27.9 32.0
27.9 32.0
27.9 32.5
27.8 32.8
27.8 33.0
27.8 33.1
TIIERMISTER READINGS
PLATE H-1A
DATE TIME AIR
TEMP.
1971
12-13 AM 11.5
12- 14 AM 11.7
12-15 AM 11.3
12-16 PM 14. <<
12-17 PM 14.3
12-20 PM 9.9
12-21 AM 6.6
12-28 PM
12-29 PM1'
12-30 AM
1972
1-11 AM
1-18 PM
1-27 AM
2-15 AM - '
3-14 AM -
3-28 AM
4- 1 1 AM
4-25 AM
5-9 AM
5-23 AM
6-6 AM
6-20 AM
7-11 AM
7-25 AM
8-8 AM
8-23 AM .
9-7 AM
9-20 AM
10-11 AM |6.o
10-24 AM
11-8 AM' 21.0
ll-2t AM 13.0
CELL A
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
21.3 24.9 16.6
24.3 25.6 22.6
21.7 25.1 16.1
21.6 25.0 15.7
.
21.4 24.5 14.6
-
21.3 21.3 13.9
21.2 23.7 13.7
-
20.7 22.5 12.8
20.5 22.0 II. 1
20. 6 21.7 13.8
19.7 20.6 17.4
19.0 19.5 15.4
18.6 18.5 15.4
18.4 18.3 16.1
18.2 18.1 16.9
18.2 18.1 16.2
18.1 18.2 20.0
18.1 18.5 21.5
18.1 18.5 23.4
18.2 19.1 24.6
18.5 '9. * 25.6
18.7 19.9 25.9
18.9 20.4 26.0
19.0 20.4 26.6
20.7 -
19.5 21.3, 24.9
The
19.5 20.6 16.7
19.4 20.4 14.3
CELL B
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
30.4 32.1 21.4
31.8 39.9 25.6
30.2 31.9 21.3
30.1 31.9 21.3
29.8 31.6 21.2
28.9 30.9 20.9
-
26.9 29.2 20.0
26.7 28.8 19.8
-
27.2 27.1 18.6
24.2 25.3 17.3
24.0 24.1 17.2
22.7 22.2 15.9
20.7 20.2 16.9
20.2 19.7 17.5
19-8 19.8 17.5
19.6 19.2 17.6
19.3 '9.0 18.8
19.2 19.0 20.0
19.2 19.2 21.1
19.2 19.5 22.6
19.5 20.1 24.1
19.7 20.6 25.1
19.8 20.9 25.0
20.2 21.3 25.0
20.5 21.6 25.5
21.9 -
20.8 21.9 23.3
mister Connections
20.5 21.1 18.5
20.6 20.8 17.2
CELL C
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
31.6 22.6 -
32.5 25.4 20.2
30.1 23.7 24.2
29.7 24.7 21.1
29.3 25.4 20.0
28.3 26.2 17.3
-
26.6 26.1 14.6
26.4 26.0 14.5
26.3 25.8 14.4
24.5 25.0 11.5
23.8 20.3 10.7
22.9 16.8 10.7
20.6 13.5 10.6
18.5 14.0 14.3
18.2 15.6 14.7
18.1 15.7 15.1
17.0 15.7 15.4
17.2 16.9 16.7
17-9 18.4 18.5
18.7 19.9 19.6
19.4 20.4 21.7
20.2 22.3 22.4
21.1 23.6 22.6
21.7 23-3 23.0
21.9 23.6 23.2
22.4 24.1 25.5
24.0
22.4 21.7 20.7
shorted-out by ra i
Shorted Out
21.2 - 17.0
CELL D
Temperature C
Bot. Hid. Top
11.3
16.1
17.7
19-5 21.2 23.2
19-5 22.1 24.3
19.5 22.5 22.4
19.9 16.4 15.2
15-9 15.1 13.7
15-7 14.0 14.5
12:4 11.5 10.8
17.0 13.9 14.3
16.5 15.9 16.0
17.0 16.3 17.6
16.6 16.6 17.0
17.4 18.1 19.)
18.8 20.0 21.8
20.9 21.8 24.7
22.9 23-5 27.6
25.0 26.5 28.0
26.9 27. J 29.2
27.5 27.6 30.3
24.9 26.6 29.3
26.8 27.6 27.9
28.1
26.9 26.0 23.6
iwater .
25.2 21.5 16.8
22.5 19.2 14.6
CELL E
Temperature C
Bot. Mid. Top
28.0 32.8 19.2
24.0 27.5 17.4
27.9 33.4 18.8
28.0 33.4 18.4
28.0 33.0 16.7
. - -
28.0 31.8 14.5
27.8 31.5 14.1
26.9 29-2 10.9
26.1 27.4 10.9
27.9 32.4 11.7
23.2 23.7 12.2
21.0 20.9 16.2
20.6 19.9 17.6
19.8 19-2 16.7
19.3 IB. 8 17.8
19.1 18.9 18.9
18.8 18.7 21.0
18.9 18.2 23.4
18.9 19-5 25.4
19-2 20.3 26.4
19.5 20.9 26.2
19.7 21.4 27.1
19.8 21.6 27.0
20.2 22.1 27.5
22.4 -
20.5 22.5 23.0
20.6 21.1 20.6
20.5 20.5 12.4
Project 102-1.3
192
PLATE H-IB
-------
THERMISTOR READINGS
DATE TIME AIR
TEMP.
11-30 AM 6.0
12-19 AM l*.0
HO-73 AM 11.0
1-23-73 AM 5.0
2-6-73 AM 11.5
2-27-73 AM 13.0
3-13-73 AM 11.5
3-27-73 AM 15.5
4-10-73 AM 21.0
*-2*-73 AM 22.0
5-15-73 AM 22.0
6-5-73 AM 20.0
6-26-73 AM 27.0
7-17-73 AM 19.5
8-7-73 AM 16.8
8-29-73 AM
9-19-73 AM 21.5
10-9-73 AM 19.5
10-30-73 AM 32.0
11 -20-73 AM -
12-11-73 AM 20.0
l-*-7* AM 10.5
1-22-7* AM 16.5
2-13-71! AM 12.5
3-6-7* AM 15.0 5
3-28-7* AM 16.0
*-!7-7* AM 15.0
5-7-7* AM 27.0
5-28-7* AM 21.0
6-19-7* AM 18.0
CELL A
Temperature C
Bot. Mid. Top
19.2 20.0 13.1
18.9 19.1 7.8
18. 2 17.6 8.0
21.2 16.8 10.5
15.** 16.
-------
OAS PROBE READINGS
(I)
DATE TIME
1971
11-19 AM
11-22 AM
PH
11-73 AM
PM
11-31) AM
PM
11-29 AM
FM
11-30 AM
PM
12-1 AM
12-2 AM
P«
12-3 Aff
l?-6 AH
PH
12-7 AK
12-8 PH
12-9 AH
12-10 AH
12-13 PH
12-1U AM
12- IS AH
12-16 PM
12-17 tK
12-19 Pi:
12-20 FM '
•j
CELL A
Exjilosllfllty-t
Bot. Kid. Tc:-
0.80 0.67 O.MO
'': 1.00 O.t.O
1.00 * O.SG
0.98 1.00 0.50
* 1.00 8.50
1.00 * 0.50
ft * 0,58
* ft " 0.68
-
'V I'- 0.60
* ft 0.58
1.00 A 0.56
1.00 * 0.145
1.00 « 0.30
1.00 * 0.35
1.00 >1 O.MO
1.00 1.00 O.Me
1.00 1.00 0.38
0.80 0.60 O.U2
« 1.00- 0.12
ft ft • 0.1(8
ft ft Q.50
» * O.U6
.
-
-
CELL B
CxploslbiJ Jty-%
Pot. Kid. Top
&?3 0.18
0.i'2 O.UO
0.50 O.UO
0.5M O.MO
0.50 O.UO
O.U8 0.10
O.U6 O.MO
0.5U 0.56
O'v70 0.60
0.'70 0.60
0.66 0.92
0.50 1.00
0.60 o.ao 0.20
0.60 0.60 0.20
O.GO 0.60 0.20
0.58 0.58
* 0.80
0.6U 0.80
0.60 0.92
0.6U 0.92
ft *
ft A *
« A *
-
0.28 0.18
-
CELL C
ExFlosTbTTity-%
hot. Hid. Ton
* * 0.2
* * 0.66
ft * o.7M
-
•'•• * 0 . 80
CELL D
Explosibllity-*
Bot. Kid. Top
0. 18
_
0.22
CELL C
ExplosTETTity-t
Bot. Mid. Top
0.20
A
Si
_
k
ft
ft 0.60
ft 0.86
ft 0.88
t: 0.88
* 0.9?
ft 0.88
A 0.90
ft 0.90
ft 0.90
0.66
0.70 0.70
ft . O.OU
ft ft
« ft
ft ft
»'•• * 0.80
ft 4 *
ft A ft
-
~ _
-
'D Gases collected in the gas probes were tested for concentration in parts per million of
combustible toxic vapors present. Concentrations exceeded instrument readout limits of 1000
parts per million and are therefore not included in this table.
* - Indicates a reading exceeding the 0-1 ranee of the explosibility gauge. PLATS H-2A
GAS PROBI HEADINGS
(I)
DATE TltfE
I«72
'" • ' " vf —
1-2 PM
! - 1 1 AC.
;-i8 PM
i-J7 PH
2- ; •> M
J-2 AN
3-14 «N
.4-11 AH
i-:5 AM
5-S13) AM
5-23 AN
6-i
6-20
7-11 AM
7-25 AH
8-23 AM
9-1 *K
•-20 AM
!C-:4 AM
li-21 A.1
12-1J AM
1173 !.'
1-2J Vtfl
2-27 AM
3-27 AK
*-2ii AM
t-S AH'
n — cnrs
Exptcslblllty-*
Bot. Mid. Top
ft ft ft
3.5 3-6 0.9
3.0 3.2
A
1.0 2.6 0.2
l.
-------
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS A & B
PROBE
NO.
A-B
A-H
A-T
B-B
B-M
B-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N 1 1 rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Ni t rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
NI trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
12-8-71
21.8
12.4
65.8
0
36.0
9.2
54.8
0
1-3-72
35.3
14.7
50.0
0
1.7.
-------
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS A S B
PROBE
NO.
A-B
A-M
A-T
B-8
B-M
B-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
12-11-73
5*. 5
0.3
45.0
0.2
64.9
0.4
26.7
8.0
1-22-74
40.5
0.2
59.1
0.2
42.5
0.4
32.8
24.3
3-6-74
72.9
0.4
26.2
0.5
63.5
0.2
18.5
17.8
4-17-74
75.6
0.5
23.4
0.5
67.3
0.2
14.4
18.1
5-28-74
44.3
0.8
54.8
0.2
63.8
0.3
21.8
14.1
38.3
0.8
58.4
2.5
>.
* - First letter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-3C
196
-------
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS C * 0
PROBE
NO.
C-B
C-M
C-T
D-B
D-M
D-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
DATE
1-11-72
54.7
8.6
36.7
0
71.8
4.7
23-5
0
57.5
6.1
3it.it
0
52.5
9.5
38.0
0
61. it
7.3
31.3
0
1-18-72
51.5
10.7
37.8
Tr
1-27-72
59.0
8.3
32.7
Tr
59.0
8.6
32. 4
Tr
77-3
4.2
18.5
Tr
2-15-72
63.9
7.8
28.3
0
75.7
4.9
19. it
0
68.5
6.2
25.3
0
89.5
1.9
8.6
0
3-2-72
67.2
6.8
26.0
Tr
72.3
4.7
23.0
Tr
94.9
0.3
it. 8
0
3-H1-72
81.6
4.0
lit.li
Tr
3-28-72
97.7
0.1
2.2
0
4-25-72
96.6
0.5
2.6
0.3
97.1
0.1
2.8
Tr
5-23-72
99.5
Tr
0.2
0.3
-20-72
98.0
0.3
1.4
0.3
98.3
Tr
1.7
Tr
7-25-72
98.4
Tr
0.2
1.4
88.0
0.1
3.2
8.7
- First letter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-4A
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS C S D
•m-
PROBE
NO.
C-B
C-M
C-T
D-B
D-M
D-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
8-23-72
95.4
Tr
0.3
4.3
58.4
Tr
1.2
40.4
9-11-72
48.5
O.ll
1.3
49.8
10-11-72
90.8
Tr
O.I
9.1
10-24-72
89.9
Tr
0.3
9.8
59.7
0.1
0.7
39-5
H-21-72
87.5
Tr
0.4
12.1
12-19-73
82.6
0.1
0.6
16.7
J -23-73
76.9
Tr
0.3
22.8
2-27-73
75.6
O.I
0.4
23.9
3-27-73
75.0
Tr
0.3
24.7
-5-73
77.0
Tr -
0.4
22.6
7-17-73
77.0
0.4
1.8
20.8
* - First letter indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-4B
-------
LABORATORY 6AS ANALYSIS
CELLS C & 0
PROBE
NO.
C-B
C-M
C-T
D-8
D-H
0-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Cor ton Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
10-9-73
75.0
Tr
0.2
24.8
22.7*'
0.6
W.I
32.6
12-1H3
52.7
Tr
0.4
46.9
21.5
0.4
27-3
50.8
2-11-74
55.0
Tr
O.I
44.9
40.8**
0.2
10.5
48.5
3-6-74
41.4
Tr
0.1
58.5
J-28-74
54.5
Tr
O.I
45.4
'
4-17-TJj
52.9
O.I
0.3
46.7
5-28-74
43.1
4.9
14.5
37.5
46.2
0.1
0.4
53.3
29.2
I.I
4.8
64.9
32.8
4.5
13.0
49.7
-
- First letter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
- Surface probe installed as of 9-18-73 due to blockage of in-cell probes.
PLATE H-4C
198
-------
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELL E
PROBE
NO.
E-B
E-M
E-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
DATE
12-8-71
1-3-72
40.7
10.0
1)5.0
4.3
39.0
13.3
46. 4
1.3
50. 8
8.5
1)0.0
0.7
1-18-72
54.
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO})
•.0.0.
Cadnlim
CalcliM
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen pp»
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ era
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ol
Fecal Strep. NPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes iun
Mercury
Nitrogen - Annonla
Nitrogen - Organic
nitrogen -. Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.I, ppb
Potassium
Sodtura
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ral/1
Sulphate
Tosperstura (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
12-15-71
5.1
12-21-71
1.4
285
4.8
1-3-72
4.7
2-15-72
240
44
16200
56
28
* 0.2
1.6
500
<0.5
2.6
0.0006
4.5
15-6
0.0
2.0
4.8
80
724
60
26
17.0
48
2. !
5.0
9-7-72
1300
2250
0
20
3260
56
30
-c 0.08
4.6
1000
* 3
< 3
0. 16
17
0.0034
0
3
0
0
6.6
128
724
70
< 0.1
20
23.5
d30
0.23
5.0
Units in mg/l unless noted.
Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-6A
LCACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Altai infty
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. KPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Hagnai ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.6. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ral/i
Sulphate
-- n
Tora^erature ( C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
10-11-72
1370
2850
0
48
3630
58
28
0.16
1.4
800
<3
<3
22.5
0.12
18
0.0078
3
14
0.10
<0.l
6.1
161
323
42 '
16.0
0.58
4.7
n-21-72
2160
16.200
<0.03
938
22,4*0
390
350
0.15
O.I
5250
< 3
9.4
750
0.44
590
0.0121)
81
89
0.0
1.4
130
300
11,800
200
10.0
10,000
9.0
4.7
11-30-72
0.4
7000
0
250
7.0
4.8
1-10-73
3920
19.200
•c-0.1
1082
20.300
490
125
0.44
0.8
7250
<3
*J
1050
0.55
760
0.0096
48
42
0.90
2.8
148
338
14,080
98
10.0
12,700
5-5
4.8
2-27-73
2310
12,700
•t-O.QS
440
17,600
424
75
0.06
0.4
5000
945
1.29
608
0.0205
66
29
0.40
1.4
120
288
10,700
14
12.0 .
S400
3-2
5-4
* Units lii mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-6B
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Hagnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod 1 urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
3-13-73
0
108
3-27-73
4-10-73
2835
17,500
<0.05
858
18,300
440
450
0.22
0.6
4750
850
1.81
548
0.0014
55
17
1.6
115
272
11,020
16
20.0
9300
3.0
4.9
11-20-73
3600
25,600
*0.05
1603
36,640
1210
0.60
0.6
9500
615
0.86
630
0.0092
328
244
*0.1
16
650
22,880
13-5
13.500
78
5.1
12-13-73
12,650
32,000
^0.05
2,369
55,150
2,148
0.27
1.2
7.800
*3
*-}
960
1.0
1,060
0
371
377
0
10
700
900 .
26,740
916
12.0
18,780
64
5.2
Units In mg/l unless noted.
Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-6C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c I urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO rol
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Total Sulphides
1-22-74
8,272
28,600
0.072
2,249
44,968
1,225
0.46
0.8
3,100
648
0.33
750
0.045
520
271
0.3
16
0
916
895
22,172
17-5
16,260
57
5.0
3-6-74
6,696
31 .000
0.044
1,883
21,050
1,176
1.08
1 .2
13,000
610
0.27
750
•£0.001
325
137
0.06
4
620
730
19,740
12.5
16,620
32
5.1
4-17-74
4,650
32,950
0.057
2,044
49,560
1 ,174
0.668
1.0
13,000
600
0.408
775
0.021
415
229
0.80
3
812
792
21,632
15.0
17,940
60
5-1
6-1 9-7*
3,162
25,000
0.046
2,244
44,122
1,125
0.38
0.9
15.000
<30
<30
748
0.63
853
0.0044
503
0.19
13
ND
646
683
22,270
20.0
18.840
50
5.3
0
* Units In mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO,
EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-60
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
1.0. D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO rol
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P. C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
12-7-71
0
13.500
320
15,933
1,475
1 .600
1 .4
>24,000
>2,400
320
66
0.029
15,970
421
4.4
12-10-71
0
15.300
200
1 7,920
998
2,000
<0.5
9.3 xlO5
2. 1 xlO7
550
58
0.084
0
25,028
496
4.2
12-15-71
4.5
12-21-71
*"
1 . 1
14,500
4.3
12-28^71
972
32,400
1 .681
42,600
1 ,800
2,500
0.8
12,000
300
1.5 xlO5
924
0.25
170
2.5
0
0
29,663
148
•c. 0. 1
6.360
4.2
Units in mg/l unless noted.
Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate l'-7A
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadm I urn
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.8. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-3-72
2360
28,350
<0.25
2950
III ,000
1725
3-6
2.4
< 3.0
2.1 x IO*1
3-0
815
0.006
226
20
1<|
83
1500
1325
42,270
368
-c.0.1
14.0
10,800
11)0
k. 2
1-7-72
7.4
14.000
12.5
4.4
10-24^72
6880
45 ,000
0.19
161(0
58,1(50
2000
950
0.29
0.5
20,000
6.0
21.00
408
0.95
816
0.0056
780
570
0.4
5.0
0
1560
1550
29,000
1800
980
19.0
17,500
62
5-0
11-30-72
...
61,700
0.2
10,000
<• 3.0
230
0
1070
6.0
5.3
1-23-73
5680
1)0,000
<0.l
1323
51, 400
498
650
0.20
0.3
9500
^3.0
360
425
0.35
344
0.0176
560
388
0
0.8
1180
1072
24,520
124
9.0
14,400
24
5.4
* Units in rag/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-7B
-------
LEACKATE ANALYSIS
CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal inity
B.O.D.
Cadm i urn
Calcium
C.O.C.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. ju mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 nl
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
.Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
3-13-73
4725
22,800
<0.05
1130
32 , 200
1320
275
0.18
0.8
4500
«3.0
93-0
- 348
0.33
378
.0044
480
250
0.1
4.2
0
940
816
17,480
36
-
1036
13-0
10,100
10.8
5-2
11-20-73
4700
47,500
0.09
2164
62,660
1438
0.14
0.1
12,500
500
0.86
840
0
753
521
<0.1
24
1550
33,440
17.0
18,420
73
5-4
12-13-73
14,280
49,500
0.08
2289
74,600
3846
0.15
1.5
8000
3-0
6.2
500
1.0
890
0
925
774
0.24
22
1700
1 710
34,000
1315
15.5
18.060
73
5.6
1-22-74
9,306
45,000
0.073
2,249
63,656
2,243
0.18
1.8
3,400
516
0.45
830
0.075
'917
545
0-. 2
24
0
1,394
1 ,530
30,204
-
16.0
15,960
6)
5.2
3-6-74
7,626
36,000
0.049
!,322
46,782
1,959
0.205
1.2
14,500
415
0.27
645
^0.001
70S
304
0.16
10
1 ,14o
520
21 ,520
14.5
14,940
80
5.4
* Units In rog/1 unless noted.
** Temperatu - of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-7C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.O.C.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppra
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/1CO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 mi
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total ,. is P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S-.Sr=
Solids - Settle. .T.I/I
Sul pha te
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
4-57-74
6,789
46,000
0.065
2,034
' 35,600
i,446
0.116
1 .4
19,000
460
0.488
815
0.016
• 871
441
0.26
-
1,417
1,«!7
28,104
! , 58C
15.0
18.120
63
5-4
* Units in fr>c/i unless nclca.
** Temperature of sa-oio •.-:ntn t
vJ for 00, Lr.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-7D
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature** (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
B.O.D.
Caefelu*
Caiclui
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppa
Elect. Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep.MPN/100 ml
Lead
Nagnesiun
Mercury
Nitrogen - Anmonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
12-15-71
4.3
12-21-71
1.1)
11,200
4.7
12-28-71
0
15.900
104)
27.300
750
1300
0.8
9500
230.000
4,300,000
1070
0-33
310
4.3
0.38
0***
15,400
323
<0.1
5-1
1-3-72
II. 0
4900
22,500
<0.25
1700
26,750
2.15
1225
1 .0
4
15,000
< 2.0
725
0.0012
304
186
4.25
3.26
445
820
16.890
260
<0.l
11,520
28
5-1
1-7-72
11.0
0.5
11,400
5.4
***Detected .06 ppb Lindane.
* Units in rog/1 unless noted
"Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-8A
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect .Cond. ^u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.8. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volati le Acids
Zinc
pH
Su 1 pha te
1-18-72
8.5
5*t80
24,600
1200
33.500
700
1200
1.7
11,000
3
"400
760
240
174
3.24
0.030
9.8
15,190
128
<0.l
5-1
2-15-72
19.0
5240
26,400
1200
39,400
750
1120
0.5
1 1 .000
500
550
432
3.8
34.0
19,336
182
5-1
880
3-2-72
16.5
4450
27,000
<0.l
1600
32,620
700
0.6
1100
1.0
10,000
<0.5
550
04014
800
400
3.10
41.7
0.35
845
950
18,444
88
10,100
42
5.1
3-14-72
21 .0
4g4u
28,200
1100
30,500
500
1060
0.3
12,500
3
43,000
410
570
280
4.2
3t
18.025
3:5
<0.»
31.00
5-1
320
3-28-72
18.0
4750
22,950
1000
30,100
820
10)0
0.6
10,000
< 3
150,000
4so
650
296
4.0
34.0
0.40
16.238
144
^.8
9100
5.1
* Units in mg/l unless
"Temperature of sample
Project 102-1.3
noted
when tested
for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-8B
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
ro
G
in
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/err
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
4-11-72
4,050
20,1.00
<=0. 1
1 ,200
27,9118
880
1 ,700
«£0.25
0.9
9,000
4
7,500.000
< 1 .0
1(50
0.0016
383
297
2.9*1
9.9
837
700
13.358
220
0. 1
1(1.8
17.5
8,1.60
30
4-25-72
3,750
17, 400
1 ,000
2li,300
860
800
O.lt
9,500
<:3
1,300,000
1(50
470
328
4.22
29.1
0
1 1 .960
96
0.2
21.0
8,560
5-2
5-9-72
4,350
21 ,300
<0. 1
980
26,680
810
560
<0.2
0.4
1 1 ,000
<3
230,000
<:! .0
400
0.015
592
312
2.40
40.6
750
800
1 1 ,980
356
<0. 1
448
19.5
9,700
30
5. 1
5-21-72
4, 100
23,700
880
24 ,600
740
400
0.4
9,750
6
43,000
220
656
240
3-6
41.9
0
12,330
84
0.5
19.0
8,720
5-1
6-6-72
3.600
18,000
0. 1
1 ,050
20,276
570
350
0.15
0.2
10,000
92
1 ,600.000
0.8
220
0.0102
632
800
1 .8
40. 3
560
550
10,080
58
0.6
340
20.0
7.730
22
4.9
* Units in mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
6.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli . HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.6. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids • Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
6-20-72
2(00
III, 700
700
20,720
530
350
0.8
8000
200
416
50
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cmtatua
C«lelu«
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Good, u mhos/ en
Fecal Coll. NPN/IQO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-7-72
3400
10,000
<0.05
570
16.320
323
275
0.07
0.2
6000
6
<3
115
0.22
158
0.0068
306
68
0.5
17.0
0
31.0
312
6800
88
<0.l
131
21.5
6060
7-5
5.0
9-20-72
3100
9200
570
15,130
540
225
1.2
6100
148
282
64
0.5
18.0
7160
78
22.5
4.9
10-11-72
1860
9900
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
2-6-73
1890
10,500
<0.1
480
12,200
526
100
0.06
0.6*"
2900
<3.0
<3.0
176
•<-0.1
116
0.0076
218
42
0.34
3.6
218
260
5260
4
15.0
5040 .
4.6
4.8
2-27-73
1470
9600
<0.05
545
12,900
405
100
0.06
0.6***
3300
278
*0.1
141
0.0209
215
54
0.40
4.2
200
272
5400
26
14.0
4.5
5.2
3-13-73
1575
7300
*0.05
457
10,700
195
75
0.05
0.4
3625
3.0
•0.0
165
O.I
96
0.0071
180
36
0.30
3.0
0
163'
228
4600
56
.
118
15.5
4200
4.3
4.7
3-27-73
1575
9400
<0.05
425
10,100
293
100
0.06
0.4
2200
173
104
176
36
0.32
4.0
165
236
4540
34
16.5
2.8
4.9
4-10-73
1575
9000
<0.05
480
11,200
205
75
0.08
0.3
1500
195
<0.1
108
0.0038
185
19
2.2
190
252
4960
20
20.0
4500
3-5
5-0
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
*** Questionable Result
Project 102-1,3
Plate H-8G
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. ju mhos/cm
Fecal Coli . HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Armenia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
V.- •
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
4-24-73
1365
9100
<0.05
400
10,800
303
75
0.05
0.7
1950
220
< O.I
98
0.0084
179
28
0.24
12.0
158
228
4800
4
19.0
3.8
5.0
5-15-73
1260
6300
«.0.05
385
9490
254
0.04
. 0.6
1900
175
0
88
0.0048
179
31
0.68
0.8
128
256
4120
28
56
21.0
3900
2.5
5.1
6-5-73
1470
6800
0
417
9860
340
0.05
0.2
2400
220
0
90
196
26
0
4.8
4400 -
18.5
1.8
5.0
6-26-73
1575
8200
*0.05
360
9600
166
0.02
0.5
2050
26.0
*3.0
218
Tr.
86
0.0002
173
22
0.56
1.4
123
226
4960
63
25.0
4380
0.6
5-1
7-17-73
1470
9100
£0.05
321
9300 '
164
0.05
0.3
1750
225
<0.1
93
136
26
0.96
3-0
0
98
244
4152
-
-
20.5
0.72
5.5
* Units In mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-8H
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
8.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. a mhos/on
Fecal Coll. HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol Ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
8-7-73
1200
6900
<0.05
353
8574
106
0.04
0.70
2800
-
-
265
0
80
0
159
26
.80
3
110
220
4520
18.5
4200
0.8
5.1
8-29-73
1300
8300
345
9500
154
0.70
2200
90
173
28
0.8
9.2
4600
25.0
6.3
9-18-73"
1400
8300
*0.05
401
9700
125
0.11
-
2100
-
275
0.20
76
168
31
0.56
18
110
166
3768
0.05
72
22.0
0-7
4.6
'fo-9-73
1700
7100
^•0.05
360
8390
125
0.23
1.30
1800
270
0
80
159
26
0.56
6.0
3600
24.0
5.0
10-30-73
1400
7000
<0.05
400
9210
130
0.15
0.6
2700
260
<0.2
82
0
126
17
3.2
8.0
78
180
3750
24.9
3900
0.6
5.1
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-81
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT * . -.
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Total Sulphides
11-20-73
1500
7900
*0.05
400
10,270
464
0.18
0.6
2,200
250
0.24
110
0
162
20
0.2
18
143
1(760
16.5
4260
1.8
5.3
12-11-73
2652
5850
0
321
7880
1396
0.08
O.It
1500
16
< 3.0
235
0
70
0
129
22
0.16
14
225
184
3604
2.5
132
18.0
3060
0.6
5-1
1-4-74
2,754
4,100
402
8,468
590
2,000
82
143
31
<0. 1
10
0
3,816
18.0
5.6
1-22-74
1,880
V.400 '
0.01
442
9,068
80S
0.04
0.8
1 ,100
232
0.07
86
0.01
129
18
0.2
8
116
164
3,252
18.0
2,880
1.7
5.1
2-12-74
2,452
5,000
289
7,286
1.954
1.4
2,200
81
100
21
0.2
7.2
3,108
12.5
5.2
0.02
* Units in ng/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-8J
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
. SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Oiganic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
3-6- 7
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
ceu o
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
ro
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
T •picture"" ("Q
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
•.0.0.
CadaluB)
Calcium
c.o.p.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
llssolved Oxygen ppra
Elect. Cond. ji mhos/en
Fecal Coll. KPN/ 100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
lercury
Nitrogen - Anmonla
Ultrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potass lim
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-7-72
13.0
0.8
7800
4.6
1-11-72
8.0
1.1
12,300
1-18-72
9.0
3050
20,400
O.I
1560
89,520
1300
0.4
1210
1.0
12,000
3-0
9.000,000
.2.0
560
0.003
194
210
4.70
0.080
79.2
0***
910
980
21.010
238
<.0.l
8850
95
4.6
2-15-72
18.5
4450
20,850
1300
26,300
550
1030
0.4
11,000
500
350
270
3.1
41.2
14,196
122
5.0
1040
3-2-72
16.5
4800
22,050
< O.I
1400
29,800
440
0.25
980
I.I
9000
<:0.5
500
0.0058
408
182
1.90
25
0
740
900
16,252
32
8690
40
5.1
* Units In 09/1 unless noted
"Temperature of Sample when tested
Project 102-1.3
***Detected .07 ppb Lindane.
for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-9A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
_ **/o,%
emperature ( C)
Alkalinity (CaC03)
B.O.D.
ladmlum
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Xssolved Oxygen ppm
Mect-Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/ino ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Tola 1 , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle. ml/I
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
3-14-72
19.5
5950
24,000
1200
30,300
270
1020
O.I
12,000
3
23,000
450
378
306
3-0
1*0
15,994
• 88
0.15
8430
5-1
920
3-28-72
17-5
50§0
22,800
1300
31,900
520
1020
0.4
10,000
< 3
43,000
500
360
209
3.80
36.0
0.20
16.948
50
0.4
10.190
5.1
4-11-72
* 17-0
4950
21,750
< 0.1
900
32,330
1700
<0.25
920
0.6
10,000
< 3
2000
1.0
600
0.0028
423
207
3.60
17.8
727
860
16.132
228
<0.l
8,300
40
..79''
4-25-72
20.0 «
4700
19.800
1000
30,700
900
1020
0.5
9000
<3
430,000
550
500
236
4.22
22.1
0
15,240
58
<0.1
10,200
5-2
5-9-72
19.0
5500
23,100
<0.l
1000
33,640
600
tO. 2
1090
0.2
12.500
6
<3
<1 .0
500"
0.0066
580
264
2.38
28.7
727
1020
16,110
409
<0.\
10,900
30
5.2
920
* Units in mg/l unless
**Temperature of sample
Project 102-1.3
noted
when tested
for 00, EC. and pH.
Plate H-98
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Mltrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i um
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
5-23-72
5600
33,600
1300
36,040
1090
360
O.I
12,200
< 3
240
360
720
332
3-1
32.0
0
17,970
40
O.I
18.5
1 1 ,400
5.2
6-6-72
5800
30,600
0.13
1800
34.524
1050
350
0.10
0.2
13,000
9.2
2300
0.5
420
0.0052
880
864
3.0
27.7
760
950
14,610
50
0.6
908
20.0
11,300
30
5.1
6-20-72
4500
33,000
1200
33.040
1100
400
0.2
12,750
420
592
440
6.34
28.1
17.450
34
21.0
5-2
7-11-72
6500
25,950
<-0.1
1320
35,060
1030
0.15
0.4
13,000
180
0.18
500
0.0045
560
142
0.16
12.4
800
880
21,220
75
23.5
10,750
28
5.2
7-25-72
7900
24,400
0.1
1416
36,400
1070
0.16
0.0
15,000
185
0.35
656
612
151
830
944
18,460
97
23.5
28
4.9
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1'. 3
Plate H-9C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Hercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol Ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72
7700
24,300
< O.I
1440
28,610
1080
0.14
0.3
14,500
3
<3
175
0.64
510
0.0095
570
149
0.08
10.0
780
1010
18,740
420
23-5
12,750
5.3
8-23-72
6000
21,550
1400
34,320
1070
250
0.4
15,200
535
638
156
2.6
23.0
20,540
264
25-0
5.1
9-7-72
7900
21,800
<0.1
1380
33,660
1080
250
0.15
0.1
13,000
9.2
<3
165
0.36
495
0.005
604
161
0.2
16.0
0
740
888
18,900
480
•40.05
600
25.0
12,500
21.5
5.1
9-.20-72
8000
22,500
1430
35,550
1250
290
0.8
14,000
545
596
167
0.2
15.0
20,200
102
22.0
5.0
10-11-72
3430
25,800
< O.I
1402
36,700
1159
290
0.25
0.0
14,000
-: 3
<3
208
0.59
568
0.005
702
190
0
8.0
750
960
19,540
370
18.0
13.600
29.5
5-1
* Units in mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-9D
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/en
fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
10-24-72
4500
25,200
0.16
1380
34,840
1200
370
0.10
0.4
15,500
185
0.47
508
630
180
O.I
4.0
800
1010
17,000
80
23.0
12,600
28.5
5.0
11-8-72
1)900
25,800
0.09
1330
33,260
1100
375
0.35
0.2
. 10,000
< 3
< 3
185
0.32
560
0.0008
556
146
0.0
11.0
760
910
17,000
600
20.5
11,200
27.5
5.1
11-21-72
4600
25,200
0.04
1440
34,340
1520
225
0.32
0.05
9000
180
0.37
630
561
137
0.0
3-0
730
800
17,400
600
17.0
12,400
25.0
5-2
11-30-72
4700
27,250
0.05
1354
34,300
1560
260
0.11
0.15
12,000
<3
3
200
0.55
580
0.0035
580
134
0.05
4.4
0
690
880
17.380
412
0
467
14.0
12,800
11.5
5-2
12-19-72
4214
26,200 '
•^O.l
1402
27.250
1565
275
0.07
0.2
9750
522
101
0.4
1.8
584
848
14,980
90
13.0
21.5
5.2
ro
ro
* Units in ng/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-9E
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal inity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod ium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-10-73
4410
26,100
<0.l
1426
30,100
1174
150
0.29
O.It
12,250
6
3
200
0.43
560
0.011
474
95
0.50
8.0
656
872
16,900
72
12.0
11,800
21.0
5-1
1-23-73
4214
25.700
•iO.l
962
31,200
1062
100
0.08
0.2
8,600
230
0.40
552
0.0156
513
119
0.08
8.0
740
896
16,440
22
13-0
22.5
5.3
2-6-73
4620
18,200
*0.1
561
31 ,600
1129
75
0.11
0.7*"*
6750
< 3.0
3.0
212
0.23
576
0.0076
498
107
0.18
5.6
740
928
16,720
28
13-0
12,200
17.8
4.8
2-27-73
1680
21,400
<0.05
1322
29,800
1225
175
0.12
0.4
7000
300
0.46
636
0.0209
500
128
0.36
2.2
640
948
16,360
66
13-0
17.6
5-5
3-13-73
4935
20,800
40.05
1400
29,700
1320
150
0.09
0.5
7000
255
0.24
388
0.0084
480
90
0.1
1.8
0
610
888
16,880
72
440
14.0
12,100
16.9
5-0
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
*** Questionable Result
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-9F
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Altai inity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron .
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
3-27-73
5460
21,1)00
•TO. 05
1386
29,500
1380
150
0.12
0.3
6000
248
612
516
90
0.2k
6.8
680
904
17,680
50
14.0
17.5
5-3
4-10-73
liA 10
24,200
'0.05
1386
29,100
1115
100
0.08
0.3
6000
275
<0.1
556
0.002
519
61
1.4
610
880
17,28*0
52
17.0
12,300
14.0
5-3
4-24-73
4935
24,100
'0.05
1600
28,500
1160
125
0.06
0.8
6000
290
0.50
604
0.0016
563
77
0.48
3.4
640
856
16,970
68
17.0
15.0
5.4
5-15-73
4515
16,100
^0.05
1218
24,450
1450
0.04
0.5
4800
240
0
672
0.0022
290
34
1.12
4.0
280
880
15,600
32
316
18.7
9900
12.0
4.9
6-5-73
4200
15,800
<0.05
1080
22,700
1565
0.10
0.4
6000
215
0
528
543
74
0.3
2.4
14,800
19.5
7.6
5.5
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-9G
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calc ium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
.Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
6-26-73
4410
15,500
<0.05
946
21,600
1145
0.08
0.40
5600
20.0
7.0
203
0.31
316
0
551
68
1.60
4.4
260
408
14,600
257
24.5
9540
8.5
5.8
7-17-73
4515
19,400
<0.05
818
18,220
1032
-
0.08
0.40
5100
-
-
205
<=0.1
536
526
80
1.42
3.0
0.6
450
784
13,840
-
-
20.0
17.5 .
5-9
ft- 7-71
4200
11,100
<0.05
•697
15,100
1,051
0.05
0.60
6,000
-
-
185
0.37
452
0
512
74
1.16
3-0
510
784
12,360
-
-
19.2
6480
3.5
,5-1
g-jcj-^j
4300
11,400
577
11,900
993
6,700
428
503
74
1.40
7.2
10,680
24.0
-
-
4.9
9-18-73
4400
8300
^0.05
561
8300
954
0.09
0.40
3900
-
-
85
0.20
396
477
71
1.10
4.0
510
704
5040
0.15
82
23.0
4.5
6.1
Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-9H
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
ro
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
CadBlura
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride ,
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Tenverature** (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
10-9-73
4500
4400
<0.05
480
5470
964
0.6
4200
368
347
88
1.34
8.0
7600
24.0
6.6
10-30-73
4300
3100
<0.05
521
4650
940
0.12
0.6
8400
54
•CO. 2
360
0
350
48
0.6
4.0
425
770
6770
25.0
1560
3.0
6.6
11-30-73
4200
3200
<.0.05
641
5960
902
0.28
0.4
6000
65
0.24
336
0.004
308
56
0.3
6.0
430
7800
17.5
2160
3.2
6.5
12-13-73
4998
2100
0
602
3550
2148
0.08
0.6
4400
2400
43
50
0.53
345
0.0036
323
68
0.9
7-6
410
670
6424
<1.0
222
18.0
960
2.4
6.7
1-4-74
3,672
1,300
442
2,336
998
3,000
317
283
60
0.5
5.2
0
5,484
14.0
6.4
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Total Sulphides
1-22-74
3,85'.
1 ,000
0.012
402
1.328
1,311
0.03
1.0
1,500
56
0.13
322
0.015
263
<46
0.3
4.0
395
645
5,004
18.0
300
1.6
6.5
2-12-74
4.432
1,100
393
1,352
2,388
0.8
7.000
264
267
45
0-3
3-0
5,148
14.1
6.6
0
3-6-74
3,534
1.200
0.005
361
1,214
1,959
0.045
0.8
8,000
60
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL 0
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
CadmluB
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppro
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Total Sulphides
5-7-7«.
3,627
280
<»33
823
881
0.7
6,200
3"*0
190
29
0.7
7.7
^,720
.--•
17.5
6.6
5-28-7
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO})
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate.
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
12-15-71
6.5
12-21 -]fl
2. It
3 ,200
6.5
1-1-72
70it
1 ,730
<0.25
200
1.986
210
0.30
170
450
1 .6
2 ,000
2l|0
24,000
i::
It. 1)0
55:
0.87
2.3
2,186
10.0
0. 1
8.0
6.2
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
-** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-IOA
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal inity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col i . MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volati le Acids
Zinc
PH
2-15-72
620
<<80
130
216
102
420
<0.2
I.I
11)00
•f 0.5
100
0.0005
6.1
13-2
0.6
2.6
8. it
71
1212
5lt
0.0
18.0
552
<0.l
5-7
3-2-72
<0.1
3-Ht-72
550
2580
300
600
6.6
5.6
27.0
0.8
3.0
25
120
2800
240
rvl
0.0
22.5
It 30
6.5
10-211-72
3720
16,800
0.09
1060
2l»,li50
750
440
0.12
0.6
7000
6.1
2lt,000
1*53
0.60
736
0.0172
220
140
0.3
3-0
0
340
361.
13,200
940
300"
20.0
1.67
5.2
11-30-72
301.0
25,250
0.06
1080
33.300
950
375
0.08
O.it
9000
<3
<-3
483
0.32
51.14
0.006lt
382
132
0
3.2
.610
656
15,400
1»20
Ii56
6.5
11 ,800
6.5
4.9
* Units in mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-IOB
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c 1 urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol Ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-23-73
4700
33.200
<0.l
1360
41,700
823
175
0.1
0.3
9000
*3.0
3.0
370
0.60
536
0.0144
602
248
0
6.4
1040
880
18,420
60
8.0
13,900
41.0
5.1
3-13-73
11.025
40,000
•CO. 05
1844
58,100
1565
425
0.19
0.6
9500
< 3.0
< 3.0
*78
0.45
676
0.010
690
35
o'
5.6
0
1400
1110
26,680
164
958
14.0
18,100
56.4
4.8
4-24-73
8910
50,500
'0.05
2160
51,900
1760
375
0.32
0.6
8000
3.0
<3.0
520
0.21
896
0.006
895
483
0.40
10.0
1430
1216
31,680
80
17.0
19,200
64.0
5-2
6-5-73
5250
42,800
*0.05
2600
62,000
1565
0.10
0.4
20,000
525
0.42
896
946
531
0
16.0
1320
1264
30,000
19.0
58
5.2
6-26-73
8925
47.300
<0.05
2605
65,600
1830
0.10
0.20
9800
< 3-0
< 3-.0
500
0.73
956
0.0174
946
560
. 0.48
3.6
1470
1344
35,240
1106
29.0
19.560
61
5.3
Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-10C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-7-73
8800
45000
<0.05
2164
65600
0.1*0
12000
550
0.69
984
958
571
0.56
32
1520
1368
36000
21.5
22100
32.5
5.3
8-29-73
8000
51000
2200
64500
1910
0.50
11700
944
682
509
0.4
19
35120
27.4
4.8
9-18-73
8600
52000
^0.1
2525
61300
1900
0.13
0.90
7250
-
-
540
0.54
964
963
580
0
19
1630
1200
26880
1284
22.0
62.0
4.8
10-30-73
8300
49,000
«0.05
2525
67.500
2019
0.12
1.0
19,000
590
«0.2
936
0.0084
823
563
<0.1
24
1180
1280
36,400
21,420
68.0
5.4
11-20-73
8800
44,500
•cO. 05
2525
65,060
2085
0.12
O.I
14,000
615
0.65
904
0.0144
848
515
0.6
20
1570
34,640
15.5
21,300
18.0
5.5
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate A-10D
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
1.0.0.
Cwfalun
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. 11 mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO nl
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Hagneslum
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb,
Potassium.. .;;.;•-•'.'
Sodium :. V;:
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids -. T.SLS'.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
P"
Total Sulphides
12-13-73
13,770
46,500
0.07
2369
65.200
2699
0.22
0.09
9000
<3
<-3
625
1.0
630
.07
888
61i>
0
26
1750
1320
32,450
1270
13-0
18,780
18.5
5-5
1 -22-7*
1 1 ,562
40,700
0.073
2,329
65,116
2,176
0.09
0.8
4.500
584
0.38
933
0.05
925
563
0-3
5.0
0
1,599
1,374
32 , 1 88
17-5
20,460
70.8
5-3
3-6r74
11,811
33,000
0.070
2,444
52,853
4,115
0.17
2.4
15,000
700
0.62
1 ,040
^0.001
776
410
0.06
7.2
1,720
1 ,185
33,356
13.5
21 ,960
109
5.5
4-17-74
5.301
42,750
0.068
66,400
4.892
0.372
1.2
19,000
. 540
0.50
933
0.024
834
507
0.30
4
1,542
1,334
30,452
1,614
15.0
21,180
50
5.4
6-19-74
3.720
29,000
0.055
2,806
64,855
2,064
1.44
0.9
15,000
<30
<30
644
0.86
874
o.oot
244
1 ,018
0.33
22
1.063
1,650
30,610
24.0
21,780
85
6.1
0
* Units In mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00,
EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-IOE
-------
WATER ANALYSIS
WATER ADDED TO CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO.)
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
(2-^-71
0.0
1.0
36
850
73
5
7.6
750
-------
WATER ANALYSIS
WATER ADDED TO CELL C
WATER ANALYSIS
WATER ADDED TO CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
e.o.o. s*~'---
Cadmium, v^y .",-" "~.\
Calcfi*'-. Vr'v, :• ' V:- .•
Chloride *"' :""•
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod 1 urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
7-25-72
330
0
;"• '"o; '"'-':-:
'..;. '22 '.:',•'';':'
57
0.07
6.4
800
0.5
0.15
16
0.0136
7-9
152
536
<0.5
32
23.5
0
0.09
7.3
8-8-72
;V':V;^
7.<>
800
19.5
7.8
9-7-72
. .-' -. .'*'•*
7.0
825
23.5
7-9
10-11-72
£"-••••'. -'-"•-
:-\> - -.-.•:
8.0
800
16.0
'1
8.0
11-8-72
"^ '— .
':'•-'."- . ^ '"
9.4
950
(4.5
8.0
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
PlateH-llC
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
AJ_ka;HnJ-ty. :
S.Or.,0. '•• • '•
" \ -"c~ " " ^x *~
Cadmium"^-. -„-.-
'Calcium^
°» V
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Temperature"" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
11-30-72
304
*z
0
.43
2 "
56
it
0.04
9.0
850
<-3
4
0.3
0
11
0.0102
0
0
0.23
0
5.7
132
1)1(0
25
10
0.03
8.0
1-10-73
9.1*
700
9
7.6
2-6-73
8.6
650
12.5
l.<*
3-27-73
292
0
28
0
50
0.06
8.8
800
0.20
0
29
0
8.7
12<<
480
0
38
14.0
0.07
7.7
6-26-73
286
0
26
4.0
49
0
6.3
980
<3.0
<-3.0
0.2
0
17
0
0
0
0.56
8.5
24
1040
97
30.1
0.06
7.95
* Units in ng/I unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-1ID
Reproduced from
be$l available copy..
-------
WATER ANALYSIS
UATER ADDED TO CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/en
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ! urn
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-18-73
294
0
2k
0
50
0.02
8.0
850
-
-
0.3
0.13
15
7.5
126
560
33-0
22.0
0.0
-------
ro
ro
ro
GROUND1MTER ANALYSIS
WELL I
GftOUNDVATER ANALYSIS
WELL I
SAMPLE DATE -
COMPONENT *
T««p«r.ture**(0C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
i.0.0.
CrtBlun
Calclua
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppn
Elect. Cond. p mhos/en
Fecal Coli . MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep.HPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total, as P
P.C.6. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sul phate
1-3-72
15.0
8.3
7.3
1-18-72
11.0
202
31
<.0.05
78
8.58
<0.2
60
6.8
750
15
<0.5
40
0.0003
0.160
0-30
0.013
0
2.35
96.0
636
0.9
7.3
3-2-72
IS. 5
88
3
*0.l
10
120
<0.2
27
5.8
260
2400
-------
GROUNDUATER ANALYSIS
WELL I
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. KPN/ 100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
7-11-72
2.9
520
22.5
7.3
7-25-72
200
0
19
<0.02
k.2
525
0
0
6
O.OOJ7
0
2. It
78
22.0
4D. 05
7. l<
8-8-72
A. 2
500
21.0
7-3
9-7-72
160
0
10
3
59
0
8.3
500
4.9
0
17
0.035
2.0
98
366
19
22.0
0.08
7.2
10-11-72
it. 8
530
19.0
7.2
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-12C
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 1
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Al kal ini ty
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. KPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPH/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settled ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
11-8-72
it. 8
500
19.0
7.3
llr30-72
lltO
«2
0
16
2
108
0.05
6.3
600
ISO
460
12.9
0
12
0
0
0.95
1.5
70
560
73
15-0
O.k
7-
-------
6ROUNDVATER ANALYSIS
WELL 1
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
I.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature"" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
.3-13-73
38
0
14
3
73
0.08
12.2
380
28
0
18
0
2.9
59
600
72
14.5
0.11
7.1
6-26-73
130
0
14
9.6
50
0.06
2-6
675
*3.0
4.0
27
0
!9
0.0004
0.1
1-3
0.8
4.0
73
960
30
35.0
0.76
7.15
9-18-73
210
0
27
0
73
0.02
4.2
650
-
-
0.8
0
18
1.5
98
600
16
21.6
0.08
6.7
^12-13-73
47
4.8
0
9
6.2
84
0.08
7.4
250
430
24
7.2
0
10
0.0011
0
0.2
1.3
42
176
34
15.5
0.06
6.8
5-7-74
84
<0.01
13
15.6
16.1
-------
GROUNDVATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature**(°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. ^u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Hitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate- Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
1-18-72
14.0
158
1
<0.05 "
8.3
0 -
2.0
25
5-2
400
3
•CO. 5
40
0 . 0004
0 .016
0 .38
0 .003
0
2.12
38
1372
0.8
•7-1
3-14-72
19.0
142
2
0.1
21
6
.01
26
6.3
340
< 3
<1.0
21
0.0009
0-096
O.I
II
27
286
0.3
7.2
3-28-72
16.0
132
31
4.7
350
218
7.0
4-11-72
17.0
132
1
< 0.1
11
I)
< 0.25
19-7
6.6
320
< 3
< 1.0
30
0.00019
0.0
1.4
26.2
272
< O.I
4-25-72
16.0
140
33
6.1
320
0.0
. 208
7-1
* Units in mg/1 unless
**Temperature of sample
Project 102-1.3
noted
when tested for DO, EC, and pH.
Plate H-I3A
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature"" (O£)
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Col i . MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep- MPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Kitrogen - nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potass ium
Sod ium
Solids - T.D.S.
Sol ids - T.5.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volati le Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
5-9-72
18.0
136
< 0.1
21
12
<. 0.2
23
6.0
330
7
< 1.0
30
0.0062
0.112
0.09
1.4
3°
198
O.I
7-3
5-23-72
20.0
136
21
3.8
360
228
7.1
6-6-72
19.0
130
9
0.12
1.5
22
0.2
30
7.5
430
< 3
0.15
29
0.0057
0.160
0.05
2.1
28.5
158
C.I4
7-0
7-11-72
19. U
4.5
360
7.0
7-25-72
23.0
6.2
400
0
7.6
* Units in tng/1 unless
** Temperature of sample
Project 102-1-3
noted
when tested for DO,
EC and pH.
Plate H-13B
-------
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. a mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Armenia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle. ml/I
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72
6.1
360
20.0
7.3
9-7-72
155
0
20
0
20
0
5-0
380
0.4
0
24
0.0011
1.45
44
212
10
22.5
0.08
7-1
10-11-72
4.2
370
18.5
7.0
11-8-72
5.2
450
19.5
7.3
11-30-72
ISO
*1
0
58
1
10
0.03
7-4
360
<3
4.0
0.7
0
16
0.0088
0
0
0.25
0.7
38
238
8
14.0
0.04
7-4
* Units in mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-I3C
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond . ij mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Mitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
I2-19-Z2
0.2
.1-10-73 ,
5.6
360
12.0
7.2
2-6-73
6.4
310
12.0
6.7
3-13-73
134
0
32
1
48
0.05
11.5
450
0.3
0
15
0.0103
1.0
28
160
10
15.0
0.04
7.3
6-26-73
155
0
19
. 10.4
18
0
6.4
260
3.0
4600
1.6
0
22
0
0.3
1.1
0.64
1.4
34
840
8
35.6
0.16
7.1
* Units in mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-I3D
-------
GMXMDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Hagneslum
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-18-73
164
0
22
0
0.03
-
320
-
-
0.3
0
18
0.9
38
120
21
22.5
0.04
6.7
12-13-73
165
5.5
0
47
10.1
5*
0.05
4.4
360
230
9
0.3
0
19
0
0
0.11
0.8
1)2
268
24
16.0
0.04
6.7
5-7-74
140
40.01
41
0.8
20.7
CO. 01
3.4
380
0.38
<0.01
25.6
0.0015
0.96
24
401
69
18.0
1.0
6.6
*
,
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-13E
-------
GROUNDUATER ANALYSIS
WELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
la^*rature**(°C}
Alkalinity (CaCO})
§.0.0.
CaofcluM
Calcium
C.0.0.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. HPN/IOO ir.l
Fecal Strep.MPM/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Anmonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Tota 1 , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
1-18-72
12.0
118
9
< 0.05
40
0
< 0.2
13
6.0
350
4
-------
GBOUUWCTER ANALYSIS
WEli 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature' ' (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc .
PH
7-25-72
6.2
400
0
22.0
7.5
8-8-72
6.7
300
20.0
7.4
9-7-72
120
0
30
0
10
0
it. 6
300
0.6
0
19
0.0009
1-55
33
178
15
22.0
0.06
7-1
10-11-72
4.7
310
19.0
7-2
11-8-72
5.0
350
20.0
7.2
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-14C
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium *-•
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/en
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature " (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
11-30-72
110
*1
0
50
1
24
0.03
7.6
300
23.0
93-0
0.1)
0
15
0.00165
0
0
li.SO
0.5
20
210
18
\k.O
0.04
7-2
12-19-72
0
1-10-73
7.4
350
12.0
7.2
2-6-73
4.8
360
12.0
6.7
3-13-73
150
0
40
0
29
0.05
11.2
350
- 0.2
0
25
0.154
0.8
32
160
27
15.0
0.07
7.3
*. Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-I4D
-------
GROUNDMATER ANALYSIS
WELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal' Coil. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
7-17-73
109
<7.6
0
37
7.8
0.06
2-9
380
43
930
5.9
0
16
0.0019
0
0.8
2.35
1.6
24
268
21.0
21.0
0.15
7.3
9-18-73
116
0
32
3.1
6
6:7
260
-
-
0.2
0
J3
~s
1-3
2k
2t. 7
300
is
75
1.2
0
13
0.0008
0
3.8
1.2
10
220
31
15-5
0.04
6.8
5-7-7*1
121
iO.Ol
35
13-5
5.17
< 0.01
6.2
260
2.24
-------
GROUNOVATER ANALYSIS
WELL i>
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj
B.O.D.
Cadmium
'.a 1 c 1 urn
c.o.o.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. y mhos/cm
Fecal Coli . MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 nl
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Kitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
1-18-72
12.0
106
10
<0.05
200
0
1 .2
27
5.5
300
")3
< 0.5
300
0.0006
0. 16
0.08
0.010
0
2.10
13-0
21)0
0.2
6.8
3-1"<-72
19.5
118
3
<0.l
30
28
<.01
30
6.0
320
<3
t
18.5
262
1.1
6.7
3-28-72
18.0
llii
2i)
-------
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 4
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72
6.0
310
18.0
6.6
9-7-72
135
0
32
0
10
0
5.0
300
1.1
0
15
0.0029
1.60
28
186
18
22.0
0.04
6.6
12-19-72
130
0
^0.1
26
0
22
0.02
4.4
330
^3-0
43.0
1.8
0
17.5
0.0086
0
0
O.I
0
1.16
28
288
23
73
16.0
0.06
6.9
3-27-73
100
0
32
1
13
0.06
5.6
380
1.65
0
21
0
1.2
. 17.5
280
35
17.5
0.05
6.4
7-17-73
109
tf.4.4
0
32
6.2
14
0.05
1.2
320
«3.0
«3.0
4.9
0
15
0
0.8
0.38
I.I
25.0
288
74
19.8
0.12
6.9
Units in ng/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-I5C
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 4
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col i. HPH/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-18-73
130
0
27
3.9
13
0.03
4.6.
260
-
-
0.6
0
16
1-2
22
280
33
20.0
0.03
6.3
12-13-73
118
-------
WATER ANALYSIS REPORT
PH. 14131 36S-3329
EDISON WAV AT 1 1 TH AVENUE
WATER. WASTE WATER AND AIR POLLUTION
CHEMISTS AND ENGINEERS
P. O. BOX 2286
MKNLO PARK. CALIF. 94O29
ESTABLISHED 1027
LABORATORY FACILITIES FOR ALL
"STANDARD METHODS" TESTS
REPORT TO • Terratech, Inc.
• 193 E. Gish Road
. San Jose, California
95112
SOURCE OF , DATE _ /_ _ DATE , /_ /, _
SAMPLE Hammel REC'D a/za REPORTED D////U
AN IONS
Nitrate (NO.)
Chloride (Cl)
Sulphate (SO. )
Bicarbonate (HCO. )
Carbonate (COi )
Phosphate (PO« )
pen LITE*
2.8
38.
11.
181.
0.0
0.1
Total Equivalents Per Million
CATIONS
Sodium (No)
Potassium (K)
Calcium (Ca)
Magnesium (Mg)
PER LITER
20.
0.40
24.
25.
Total Equivalents Per Million
ft* MILLION
0.04
1.07
0.23
3.00
0.00
0.00
4.34
PER MILLION
0.87
0.01
1.20
2.06
4.14
DETERMINATION
Phenolphthalein Alkalinity(CaCO> ,
Methyl Orange Alkalinity (CaCO,)
Total Hardness (CaCOi)
Calcium Hardness (CaCO»)
Magnesium Hardness (CaCOi )
Total Solids - Calculated
Total Solids • Evaporation
Loss On Ignition
Total Fixed Residue
Sp. Cond. - Micromhos 25°C
MibLIORAM*
PCM LITE*
0.0
148
164
60
104
233
245
346
DETERMINATION
Silica ($iO.)
Iron (Fe)
Manganese (Mn)
Boron (B)
Fluoride (F)
Hyd. Ion Cone. (pH)
MILLIGRAMS
PIN LITCR
20
0.77
0.03
0.1
0.33
7.24
THIC I* AN APPROVED COMMCRCIAL WATER LABORATORY DESIGNATED «Y THE STATE Or CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
COMMENTS:
ORIGINAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Reported by
'ORM c »'«e
PLATE H-I6A
233
-------
6ROUNDUATER ANALYSIS
CELL ACE SUBDRAIN
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
T«*Mr«ture**<0C>
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
i.O.D.
CadHlun
Calclua
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Ditto! ved Oxygen ppn
Elect. Cond.^i mhos/cm
Fecal Coll .MPN/100 ml
Facal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnes 1 urn
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate- Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potass tun
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
12-8-71
116
0
10
It
5
23
22
216
5.6
1-7-72
15.0
4.*
400
5.8
2-15-72
16.5
5-5
320
5-5
3- U -72
17.5
V3
3
-------
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
CELL A & E SUBORAIN
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium.
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
IHtrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
9-7-72
11.0
0
38
8.7
II
0
7.0
825
O.I
0
12
0.0025
0.70
30
186
15
23-5
0.05
6.1
11-30-72
130
0
0
56
0
13
it
0.02
5-6
i<50
<3
<3
0.4
0
16
0.0165
0
0
1.67
0
0.9
22
330
16
15.0
0.03
5.9
1-10-73
9.4
700
9.0
7.6
3-27-73
ISO
0
46
1
18
0.06
6.0
420
0.13
0
13
I.I
30
220
14
16.0
0.06
6.0
12-13-73
147
<1
0
47
0.8
54
0.05
5.4
320
*3
<3
0.5
0
19
0.0002
0
2.1
1.0
54
244
27
18.0
0.03
6.7
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Project 102-1.3
Plate H-17C
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
CELL A & E SUBDRAIN
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
6-19-74
132
0.5
-------
OBSERVATION WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS
Depth to Water Level - Feet
DATE
1-18-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
11-8-72
11-30-72
12-19-73
1-10-73
2-6-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
>>- 10-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
7-17-73
8-7-73
9-18-73
12-11-73
1-22-74
3-6-?ii
4-17-74
5-7-74
WELLS
1
6.5
6.0
5.5
5-7
5.5
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.7
6.0
-
6.1
6.1
6.4
6.1
5.9
4.7
4.1
2.8
-
2.7
3.6
3.9
4.3
5.6
2.6
1.0
1.0
1.5
2.8
2
7-0
8.0
6.6
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
8.1
-
8.1
8.2
8.1
6.3
6.4
4.2
3.3
3.8
-
3.6
4.2
7.4
7.9
8.4
4.6
2.3
2.0
*:S
3
8.5
7.0
6.4
6.5
6.3
6.2
6.4
£.6
5.8
7.7
-
8.4
9.1
9.7
6.9
4.7
3.8
2.4
3.8
-
3.8
3.1
7.1
7.6
8.4
3.6
3-5
3;5
\:l
4
18.5
19.0
18.5
18.5
18.7
18.9
18.9
19.0
19.1
19.3
19.4
19.5
17.0
14.1
18.8
18.5
14.0
IB
PIEZOMETERS
1
10.0
5.9
4.6
3.6
2.3
2.4
-
2.2
1.8
0.8
0.7
1.6
1.3
0.8
2
1.0
1.0
1.4
1.7
1.5
1.9
-
1.9
0.3
0.0
0.0
2.5
1.0
0.9
3
None
7.7
5.4
4.0
2.3
2.4
-
2.1
1.8
0.9
0.5
3.2
0.7
1.2
t>
5
6
PROJECT 102-1.3
PLATE H-18A
-------
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
ro
GO
-vl
C/ete
12-7-71
12-15-71
12-19-71
12-28-71
1-3-72
1- 1 1-72
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-2B-72
4-1 1-72
4-25-72
9-7-72
10-15-72
10-1 7-72
10-18-72
10-19-72
10-20-72
10-21-72
10-24-72
1 1-8-72
1 1-27-72
12-6-72
12-11-72
12-18-72
12-21-72
(1)
CeM A - Ga'lons
Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
0. 3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
30.8
50. ?
'
80.8
80.8
80.8
81.8
81 .8
81.8
81 .8
81 .8
81 .8
84.3
(2)
Cell B - Gallons
830
833
834
837
838
838
«38
R}8
P,38
83S
838
838
838
-
808
958
1018
IOR3
1093
1 153
1164
1164
1 164
1 164
116
1 164
1 164.5
(3)
Cell E - Gsl'cns
Tr
0. 1
0. 1
0. 3
0.7
0.5
1 .9
2 . 1
2 . 2
2 .2
2 . 2
2 .2
-
-
17.2
-
22 .2
22.2
22.2
23. 7
46.2
71.2
81 .2
?C -2
116.2
116.7
bete
12-26-72
1-4-73
1-1 1-73
1-18-73
1-26-73
2-1-73
2-8-73
2-15-73
2-22-73
3-1-73
3-8-73
3-15-73
3-22-73
3-29-73
4-5-73
4-12-73
4- 19-73
4-26-73
5-3-73
5-10-73
5-17-73
5-24-73
5-31-73
6-7-73
6-l
-------
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
V
•fe-
"5
ro
co
00
Date
7-5-73
7-12-73
7-19-73
7-26-73
8-2-73
8-9-73
8-16-73
8-23-73
8-30-73
9-6-73
9-1*- 73
9-21-73
9-28-73
10-5-73
10-12-73-
10-19-73
10-26-73
11-2-73
1 1-9-73
1 1-16-73
1 1-23-73
1 1-30-73
12-7-73
!2-l*-73
' 12-21-73
12-28-73
l-*-7*
(1)
Cell A - Gallons
1*6.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
: 1*8.5
1*8.5
• 1*8.5
; 1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
1*8.5
183.5
**3.5
667
771
92*
100P
1 lOfi
1213
1363
(2)
Cell B - Gallons
1 171 .0
1171.0
1 171 .0
1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
II 71.0
1171-0
; 1171.0
• 1 1 7 !• . 0
1171.0
: 1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1.171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1206.0
3550
*660
5000
5350
5625
5POO
5975
6225
(3)
Cell E - Gallons
2583.2
2623.2
2670.2
2708.7
27*8.7
27*9.7
2823-7
2859-7
2896.7
2935.7
298*. 7
3021 .7
3051 .7
3090.7
3122.7
3152.7
3182.7
320*. 2
3238.5
3350.5
3700
*! 17
*51*
i(?71
51P3
5503
5917
Date
1-11-7*
1-18-7*
1-30-7*
2-8-7*
2-15-7*
2-22-7*
3-V7*
3-8-7*
3-15-7*
3-22-/*
1-29-7*
li-3-7*
A-12-7*
4-19-7*
i)-26-7*
5-3-7*
' 5-10-7*
5-20-7*
5-2*-7*
5-31-7*
6-7-7*
6-l*-7*
6-20-7*
6-27-7*
7-5-7*
(1)
Cell A - Gallons
1513
1713
1917
201 7
2057
2092
21 67
2207
2287
2337
2*37
2527
; 261 7
2677
27*0
2780
281*
2882
2912
2952
2982
3010
'• 30*2
3066
3091
(2)
Cell B - Gallons
6*75
6775
7500
7610
7660
7730
7820
7880
7980
8050
8200
8350
8500
8560
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
8660
(3)
Cell E - Gallons
6267
6720
7200
7*00
7600
78*0
7990
8090
82*0
8*81
8681
8880
92*0
9*65
96**
9800
993*
10098
10160
1025*
103*1
10*1 7
10*79
105*7
10622
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATt H-19 C
COUNTY Of SONOMA
fLATl H-190
-------
LYSIHETER SAMPLE FIELD ANALYSIS
Lyslmeter
Location
Cell A -
4 feet below
bottom of Cell
Cell A -
8 feet below
bottom of Cell
Cell E -
8 feet below
bottom of Cell
Date
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
4-10-73
7-17-73
12-13-73
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
4-10-73
7-17-73
9-18-73
12-13-73
12-15-71
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
li-10-73
7-17-73
Volume
ml
200
30
30
70
50
30
50
blocked
52
40
400
200
50
240
250
400
150
0
91
100
300
50
300
35
50
35
50
30
50
blocked
blocked
pH
5.6
7.1
7.1
6.5
8.4
5.9
6.5
5.9
5-9
5.7
7.0
7-4
6.9
7.3
6.4
6.8
-
6.7
-
6.0
7-4
6.6
7.4
6.9
7.1
8.3
7.2
7.0
-
"
D.O.*
Ppm
5.0
8.4
7-8
9.0
-
9.0
-
.
2.4
5.8
1.3
9-3
8.1
10.0
9.2
9.6
10.2
-
4.0
-
8.2
_
5.9
8.7
8.0
10.4
-
8.9
-
-
E.C.
p mhos/cm
380
-
-
.
-
-
-**
.
290
140
310
_
.
.
160
275
300
-
400
240
300
.
290
.
-
.
-
-
.**
-
ro
CO
10
Water samples are collected from lyslmeters by displacing the sample with
air from a pressurized tank. This procedure thoroughly aerates the sample.
Insufficient quantity for D.O. or E.C. tests.
Project 102-1.3
PlateH-2IA
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
NOV.
1971
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ruTALS
RAIN-
FALL
»
0.29
0.25
0.02
0.96
1 .52
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
TOTAL
SALLOWS
CELL B
METER
READING
TOTAL
GALLONS
REMARKS
No Evaporation <
runoff data was
for this month .
evaporation reported In Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23A
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
DEC.
1971
1
2
3
'(
5
6
Z.
8
•3
--.1°
II
_._!?._ _
it
• 5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
f'.'TALS
RAIN-
FALL
0. 50
0.32
0.2*
0/27
0.09
0.03
0-77
0.05
0.51
0.22
0.06
1 .77
0.03
4.86
RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METtR
READING
TOTAL
GALLONS
CELL B
METER
READING
TOTAL
GALLONS
..
REMARKS
Mo evaporation or
runoff data was taken
for this mon th .
Evaporation reported in Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 B
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1972
1
2
3
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MARCH
1972
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0. 10
0.08
0.05
0.25
0.1)8
.160
. 128
.032
.077
.077
. 192
.077
.160
.064
.128
.128
.077
.064
.128
. 128
.192
.064
.077
.077
.064
.064
.077
.077
.077
.064
.288
. 160
.064
.064
. 160
.064
3.253
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
NETER
READING
732
732
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
420
420
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
REMARKS '
Evaporation and r
meters were opera
as of March 1st.
Runoff meter read
are the initial r
after test i no. .
cvaporation reportedin Inches
COUKTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 E
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
APRI L
1972
1
2
3
•')
5
6
1 ..
8
•3
10
1 1
12
_Ji.
'1;
_!.5_
16
I?
16
_.l?
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
f'.'lALS
RAIN-
FALL
0. 15
0. 15
0.58
0. 26
r .22
1.36
rvAP.
.06li
Tils'
.077
"'.'192
.077
. I2P
.0614
. 160
. 160
. 160
. 16"
. ICO
. 160
. 160
. 160
. 160
. 160
.256
. .-.2.56.
.256
^256
.256
.256
_:J_5A
.256
.256
.256
.256
* A
**
**
5. 1*6
RUNOFF
CELLS A
METER
READING
732
732
732
712.
732
.
& E
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
.0
0
_
0
CELL e
METER
READING
420
420
420
4-2 Q
^*
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
Q
0
0
REMARKS
* Ran flow test on
drainage meter. This
flow was not due to
rainfal • runoff.
** Evaporation a a n »> was
beinn repaired and
recordtna o" these
dates .
rvaporat.on reported in Inches
COUIiTY OF SONOKA
PLATE H-23 F
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFr
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFr
HAY
1972
1
2
3
it
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
U
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 It
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.00
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.128
.256
.788
.288
.256
. 128
. 128
. 160
. 160
. 192
.128
. 160
.077
.221)
-077
. 128
.077
.061.
.064
.256
. 160
. 160
3.559
RUNCFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
732
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
549
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
REMARKS
* Evaporation gage was
belno repaired and
was not available for
recordinq on these
dates.
Evaporation reported In Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
JUNE
1972
1
2
3
'4
_J_
6
8
_..9...
10 _
II
_I2
>3
U
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JULY
1972
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
II
12
13
i i*
1 '5
1 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2k
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.00
.397
. 160
.192
.192
.192
.077
. 160
.160
.320
.800
.197
.112
.768
.896
.576
.320
.224
.256
.128
.128
. 160
. 160
.064
.192
. 160
.192
.320
-192
. 160
.128
.224
9.111
RUNOFF
CELLS A £ E
HETER
READING
732
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
CELL B
KETER
READING
549
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
REMARKS
evaporation reported in Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 I
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
AUG.
1972
_ 1
2
3
•t
5
6
Z_ .
8
1 ..'3
10
II
12
13
it
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
21.
. JJ
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
TR
TR
CVAP.
.288
. 192
. 128
. 160
.320
. 192
.221.
.221.
. 160
.128
^•J.28
.320
,320
.205
.192
.077
.22li
. 160
._: ° 7 ?
. 192
.221.
.268
.256
.352
.384
. 192
. 192
. IS2
. 128
.192
.128
6.439
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
-----
763
1 168
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
783
1569
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
REMARKS
* Meter F 1 ow due
Testinn nnd A d j
evaporation reported in Inches
COUiiTY OF i
PLATE H-23 J
-------
RAINFALL. EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
SEPT.
1972
1
2
3
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFr
NOV.
1972
1
2
3
It
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
•3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 It
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
1.33
0.01
0.56
0.70
0.34
1 .06
2.09
0.27
0.04
0.14
6.5"t
.064
.077
.032
.000
.064
.064
.064
.288
.128
. i?a
.224
. 192
. 160
. 160
. 192
.288
.288
.256
.128
.224
.096
.192
. 192
. 128
.064
.064
.320
.224
. 160
.064
*.525
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
2221
4889
6183
6670
8150
nooo
23600
25790
25800
25800
TOTAL
GALLONS
2668
1249
532
1680
4650
10600
2190
10
0
23579
CELL B
KETER
READING
5087
6500
7*38
7588
8240
10050
15560
16320
16380
16380
TOTAL
GALLONS
1413
93?
ISO
652
1810
5510
760
60
0
11293
REMARKS
evaporation reported in
I
DEC.
1972
1
2
3
;i
5
6
. 7 .
8
•}
10
11
12
'3
":
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2??
.000
_;932
.288
.256
. 192
. 320
.416
.320
.320
^1-2
. 128
. 128
.000
.096
.096
.000
.032
.000
.000
.000
.256
.032
. 352
.861.
. 160
.O6'i
.1180
.352
.288
.736
6.lt32
iUIHCFF
CELLS A s E
METER
READING
25«00
25800
27410
28790
36000
41460
41490
141490
41490
._
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
1610
1380
72 10
51)60
30
0
0
—
15690
CELL 8
METER
READING
16 3RD
_ 16380
16910
17540
19280
2 1880
2 IB80
2 1880
21880
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
530
630
1 746
2600
0
0
0
5500
R
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 M
evaporation reported in Inches
COUIiTY OF 50NOHA
REMARKS
Meter failed durino
this period at runoff
Mete r repaired.
PLATE H-23 N
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
1.20
1.03
0.22
3.07
2. 71
0. 10
2.17
1.81
0.50
0.24
0. 16
0.69
0.08
0. 16
III. 16
.800
.224
• 352
.288
.244
.256
.000
.032
.064
.064
.032
.000
.061)
.192
.096
.224
. 160
.224
.416
.224
.128
.128
. 128
.064
.288
.256
.288
.288
.128
. 160
.244
6.036
aUNOTF
CELLS A & E
NETER
READING
41490
45870
509*0
51830
71700
91800
91810
106250
1 19800
119800
121890
121890
121890
122610
122610
124500
126JBO
126940
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
4380
5070
890
19870
20100
10
14440
13550
0
2090
0
0
720
0
1890
1880
560
85450
CELL B
METER
READING
21880
24080
263*0
26780
36540
45790
45920
51960
57*10
57630
58060
58060
58060
58270
58270
58560
59100
59170
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
2200
2260
440
9760
9250
130
6040
5670
0
430
0
0
210
0 *
290
54§
78
37290
REMARKS
* Cell "B" runoff
metering device m
f unet i on . Resu 1 t
quest i onab 1 e till
2/17/73.
Fvaporation reported In Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 0
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
FEB.
1973
1
2
3
'4
_5_
6
7__ _
8
•3
10
1 1
12 _
"3
U
15
16
17
l£
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.05
0.40
1 .01.
°.-35
0.92
.. P.-P*.
0.06
0.86
-£..29
0.05
0.22
0.59
0.86
0.01
•
0.76
0.01
..-0--96
1 .04
0.03
8.54
FVAP.
.288
_.L9-2.
.22',
. -J2Q
.• L9.2.
.128
.192
. 160
. 160
.096-
....124
.096
• !28
.288
.288
.2P8
.288
.38".
.256
.416
.544
.256
.288
.384
.320
.22'.
.096
.224
6.944
3UNCFF
CELLS A $ E
METER
READING
I26J40
126950
136560
143150
143190
160860
160860
160860
163423
172760
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
10
9610
6590
40
'767_0J
.0
0
2563
-
9337
45820
CELL B
METER
READING
._59I70
-53LL70
62350
64990
64990
71790
71790
71860
73530
78680
TOTAL
GALLONS
A
0
0
3180
2640
0
6800
J. J.
o"'
70
1670
5150
19510
REMARKS
* Cell "B" runoff
meter i ng dev i ce
malfunction. Resu
questionable, til
2/17/73
Fvaporation reported in Inches
COUIiTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23P
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
ro
-e»
00
MARCH
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
"3
111
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.04
0.86
0.01
0.47
0.38
0. IB
0.56
0.32
0.58
3.40
.288
-352
.064
.192
.224
.256
.288
.320
.288
.046
. J84
.576
.800
.736
.288
.256
.416
.120
.064
.416
.384
.384
.544
.224
.256
.288
.544
.640
.448
.032
.448
10.816
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
176440
176440
183210
183210
184780
184780
TOTAL
GALLONS
3680
0
6770
0
1570
0
12020
CELL B
METER '
READING
81030
81030
86 1 30
86300
87710
87710
TOTAL
GALLONS
2350
0
5100
170
1410
0
9030
REMARKS
c=> • •
Fvaporation reported In Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23Q
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
APRIL
1973
1
2
3
'i
5
6
_!-_
8
.___•)
JO
II
._ 12.
i':
]S
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.19
. ._..
0.19
F.VAP.*
__-UJ
1. 153
.80C
.eoc
.512
.48?
.60S
.672
.672
.76?
.-,320
.480
.320
.381
.480
.192
.640
.640
.640
.961
1 .280
.640
.640
.608
.576
.224
.286
.320
.352
.640
17.674
3UNCFF
CELLS A £ E
METER
READING
185780
185780
185780
185780
185780
18780
185680
TOTAL
GALLONS
1000
0
0
0
0
0
---
0
1000
CELL B
METER
READING
R84V:
88440
88440
88440
88440
TOTAL
GALLONS
730
0
0
0
0
0
0
730
REMARKS
^Evaporation reportedinInches
COUNTY OF i
PLATE H-23
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
HAY
1973
1
2
3
it
S
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
Id
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.07
o.ot
0.38
.320
.320
.381.
.412
.1.1,8
.544
.736
.832
.1.12
1 . 152
.800
(,fin
f:f(,
.SM
.5
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JULY
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
'3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
21)
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
IX'IALS
RAIN-
FALL
f
0.00
.768
.800
.736
1.376
.928
.896
.768
1 . 120
1. 120
.128
.800
.736
.512
.480
.320
-352
.352
.*16
.6*0
.704
.736
1.3**
.961
1.18*
1.50*
1 .50*
.70*
.*16
.1.1.8
. 1.1)8
.576
24.577
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
185780
185780
185780
185780
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
88**0
881)40
88440
88440
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
REMARKS
rvaporation reported in Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23U
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
AUG.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 ___
10
11
12
,3
ll!
)5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.00
tVAP.
.352
.448
.480
.576
.640
.384
.480
• 352
.448
.640
—^l*
OZ3
. 704
.640
.896
.736
.544
.5<-4
.(•40
-73C
.£40
.^•72
.736
. ROD
.576
.544
.384
-576
. 704
.480
.736
17.984
RUNOFF
CELLS A £ E
METER
READING
185780
185780
185780
185780
._.
185780
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
88440
R8440
88440
RP440
88440
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
— - -
0
0
0
0
REMARKS
Fvaporation reported in Inches
COUNTY OF SONOKA
PLATE H-23V
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
SEPT.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1*4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.05
0.30
0.35
0.05
0.75
EVAP.
• 352
.1(16
.416
.480
.480
.544
.993
1.888
.961
.416
.416
.416
.416
.416
.320
.320
.320
.320
.320
.320
.448
. 160
.608
.480
1 .025
1 .025
1 .025
.736
.416
.224
16.67"
RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METER
READING-
185780
185780
185780
185780
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
88440
88440
88440
88440
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
REMARKS
Evaporation reported Tn Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 W
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
OCT.
1973
1
2
3
'4
s
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.10
0.18
.
0.30
0.60
0.20
1.38
EVAP.
.416
.544
.846
.736
.736
.224
. 320
.128
.416
.608
.384
.576
. 704
.672
. 128
.768
.864
. 736
.416
. 192
-576
. 160
.224
.416
. 352
.384
.576
.928
1.536
.640
.320
16.544
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
185780
185780
185780
185870
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
90
90
CELL B
METER
READING
88440
88440
88440
88600
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
160
1 60
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 X
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
NOV.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Mi
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
2.20
0.16
0.70
1 .09
1.10
0.90
0.21
0.30
0.62
0. 50
0.63
1.10
i
o. 38
0.25
0.09
0.03
0. 10
0.80
11.16
.320
.285
.416
.320
.064
.06'
.000
.256
.06'
. 12!
.09*
.22'
.I2f
.224
.096
.064
. 160
.48C
.352
.256
.22'
. 128
. 160
.4161
.22'
.256
. 192
.352
. I2P
1 Q
6.27
RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METER
READING
185870
186370
186910
195120
198250
203970
20*940
204940
204940
205520
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
500
540
4
R210
3130
5720
970
0
0
5TO
19650
CELL B
METER
READING
88600
f>9200
89730
94520
9C500
99350
lonioo
100170
100170
100390
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
600
530
479C
1980
2850
750
70
0
220
1 1 790
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 Y
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
DEC.
1973.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
I'l
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.59
0.02
0.46
0. 20
0. 30
O.K6
0.02
1 .32
1.37
0. 18
0.1)2
0.02
4.76
EVAP.
. 192
. 1?2
. 12P
.064
. 192
.27.1-
.032
.032
.Of 1)
.064
.256
. 12P
.0<»6
. 064
.O.f
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1974
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
2.18
0.10
0.19
0.17
o.oq
0.06
1.55
1.23
0.02
0.25
O.OS
0.55
6.4'
EVAP.
.512
.576
.096
.192
.064
.064
.224
.224
. 160
.064
.064
.032
.064
.000
.384
. 128
.096
.064
.096
. 160
.480
.736
.832
.480
.192
.352
.640
.640
.640
.128
.032
8.416
RUNOFF
CELLS A 6 E
HETER
READING
237050
2T7190
252380
252380
TOTAL
GALLONS
10730
140
15190
0
26060
CELL B
HETER
READING
122180
122580
132660
132660
TOTAL
GALLONS
7980
400
10080
0
18460
REMARKS
Evaporation reported In Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23 AA
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
FEB.
1974
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.09
0.22
0. 29
0.90
0. 35
0. 10
0.01
0.89
2.8!
EVAP.
.2211
. 352
.256
.192
.672
.993
.it *i8
. 352
.416
. 352
. 160
. 192
. 192
.256
. 160
.288
.288
.06lt
.381.
.320
. 128
.320
. 352
.448
.288
. 192
.256
.128
8.673
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
252840
252840
257950
TOTAL
GALLONS
1(60
0
5110
5570
CELL 8
METER
READING
133300
133300
1 36940
TOTAL
GALLONS
640
0
3640
4280
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
COUHTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23BB
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MAR.
197ll
1
2
3
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
HAY
1974
1
2
3
it
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.00
.1.16
.352
.256
.224
. 160
.288
.224
.320
.608
.586
.1(80
.608
.512
.640
.704
.640
.544
.352
.608
.704
.512
.256
.800
.768
.576
.896
.704
.288
.512
.544
.416
15.498
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
286370
286370
286370
286370
286370
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
159050
159050
159050
159050
159050
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
0
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23EE
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JUNE
1974
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
U
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.02
0.02
EVAP.
.352
.381.
.1.1.8
.961
.961
.961
1 .21.8
1.952
.61.0
.61.0
.1(16
. T;2
.512
. 51. It
. 544
.1(16
.1)16
.256
.512
.608
.608
.512
. 1*1.8
. 416
. 768
. 768
. 86<<
1.121
.961
.1(80
20.069
RUNOFF
CELLS A & E
METER
READING
286370
286370
286370
286370
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
159050
159050
159050
159050
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
COUKTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-23FF
-------
SETTLEMENT DATA
SETTLEMENT DATA
r\a
CELL-
MONUMEN'T
A-l
A-2
A-3
A- 4
A-5
3-1
B-2
6-3
8-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-k
C-5
0-1
0-2
D-3
0-4
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-4
E-5
DATE
1 1-I6-/I
280.89
280.3*1
280.36
280.76
280.59
11-22-71
280. *7
279.91
279.83
280. 15
279.98
11-23-71
280.57
280.09
279.98
280.30
280.20
12-6-71
280.45
279.95
279.81
280.08
279.96
307.28
307. 10
306.99
306. *3
307-M
12-10-71
281.27
281.14
281. 15
280.70
280.85
12-14-71
307.93
307.85
307.79
307.79
307.53
CELL-
MONUMEKT
A-l
A-2
A- 3
A-4
A-5
3-1
E-2
6-3
6-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
0-1
0-2
0-3
D-4
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-'i
E-5
DATE
12-21-71
280.52
279-94
279.88
280.23
280.03
307. 15
306.92
306.69
306.20
306.87
280.90
280.73
280.72
280.35
280.60
12-28-71
306.97
307.21
306.82
305.91
306. 16
12-30-71
280.39
279.95
279.82
280.09
280. II
306.95
306. 74
306.48
305-94
306.61
307. <•?
307 .44
307.26
307. 40
307. 13
306.55
306.77
306.27
305.55
305.59
280. 70
280. 57
280.1(7
280.20
280. 34
1-7-72
280.52
280.03
279.92
280.23
280. II
306.97
306. 75
306.52
306.03
306.67
307. 44
307. 38
307. 19
307. 33
307.06
306.51
306.76
306.27
305.57
305. 6
-------
SETTLEMENT DATA
SETTLEMENT DATA
IVi
cn
CELL-
MONUMEKT
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
3-1
D-2
6-3
B-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
0-2
D-3
D-4
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-'i
E-5
DATE
1-31-72
280. 5 1
280.00
279-91
280.22
280. 10
306.95
306.72
306.50
306.01
306.65
307. 40
307.34
307.14
307.26
307.01
306.45
306. 70
306. 19
305.55
305.56
280.91
280.71
280.73
280.45
280.67
2-14-72
280.50
280.01
279.91
280. 22
280. 10
306.95
306.72
306.49
306.00
306.64
307. 38
307. 31
307. 12
307.26
307.00
306.42
306.68
306. 17
305.48
305.54
280.90
280. 70
280.72
280.44
280.67
3-2-72
280.52
280.03
279.91
280. 23
280. 10
306.95
306.72
306.48
306.00
306.63
307. 37
307.31
307. 11
307.25
306.99
306.41
306.68
.306. 16
305.48
305.53
280.91
280.71
280.72
280.45
280.67
3-31-72
280.49
280.01
279.90
280.22
280.09
306.93
306.71
306.47
305.99
306.62
307.35
307.28
307-03
307.22
306.96
306.39
306.66
306. 13
305.45
305.51
280.89
280.67
280.70
280.43
280.65
4-28-72
280. 50
280.02
279-91
280.22
280. 10
306.93
306. 71
306.46
305.98
306.61
307. 33
307-26
307-06
307.21
306.93
306.37
306.65
306. 1 1
305-43
305.49
280.89
280.68
280.71
280.44
280.65
6-1-72
'280.50
280.02
279.89
280.21
280. 10
306.93
306. 70
306.46
305.98
306.61
307-32
307.24
307.05
307. 19
306.90
306.36
306.64
306. 1 1
305.42
305.48
280.88
280.65
280.71
280.44
280.64
CELl-
MONUMEK'T
A-l
A- 2
A- 3
A-4
A-5
G-l
D-2
6-3
6-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
D-2
0-3
D-l.
D-5
E-l
E-2
£-3
E-'i
E-5
DATE
8- 17-72
2 80 I it 8
280.01
279.89
280.21
280.09
306.89
306.67
306.') 1
305-95
306.57
307.28
307. 19
306.98
307. 14
306.81.
306.31
306.59
306.03
305.36
305.39
280.86
280.61
280.67
280. 1.2
280.61
10-13-72
280.1.8
279.99
279.88
280.20
280.08
306. 88
306.66
306. bo
305-94
306. 56
307.25
307. 15
306.95
307. 1 1
306.80
306.28
306.56
305.99
305. 33
305.36
280. 85
280.60
280.66
280.'.!
280.60
1 1-20-72
280.1.6
279.98
279.86
280. 18
280.06
306.86
306.6<>
306.
-------
SETTLEMENT DATA
CELL-
HONUMEKT
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
B-l
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
D-2
0-3
O-ll
0-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-'<
E-5
DATE
10-2-73
280. 43
279.96
279.8li
280. 16
280.04
306.83
306.62
306. 36
305.90
306.52
307.20
307.06
306. 86
307.05
306. 71
306.21
306. A3
305.85
305.24
305.20
280. 79
280. 52
280.60
280. 35
280.53
I-*-?*
280.1)2
279. 9*
279.82
280. |1>
280.03
306.81
306.61
306.34
305.89
306.50
307. 16
307.03
306.83
307.02
306.68
306.19
306. 38
305.81
305.22
305.01
280.77
280.52
280.58
280.34
280.50
4-2-74
280. 42
279.94
279.82
280. 14
280.02
306. 80
306.60
306. 34
305-88
306.50
307. 16
307.01
306.82
307.01
306.67
306. 17
306.34
305.77
305. 19
304.96
280. 77
280. 52
280.58
280. 33
280. 50
7-3-74
280.40
279.92
279.80
280. 12
280.00
306.79
306.59
306.32
305.87
306.49
307.15
307.00
306.81
307.01
306.66
306.07
306.24
Disturbec
305.09
304.83
280.75
280.48
280.56
280. 31
280.47
ro
01
oo
COUNTY OF SONOKA
PLATL H-24 E.
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
1971
*
12-30
12-31
1972
T-^3
1-4
1-5
1-7
l-IO
1-H
1-12
1-13
1-14
1-17
1-18
1-19
1-20
1-21
1-24
1-25
1-26
Leac
Start
(In)
5.8
6.5
7.8
7.9
7.9
8.5
8.6
8.8
8.8
9.0
9~.0
9.4
9.5
9.6
10. 1
12.4
28.4
33.2
40.3
ate Co
End
(In)
1 lection
Total
(In)
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
2000*
2000
0
2000
Distribution
Start
(In)
68. 1
73.5
73.5
73.5
73.3
73-2
73.5
68.0
73.5
73.5
73-5
74.3
72.7
72.6
73.2
83.5
73.8
72.3
73.3
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
(In)
67.1
72.5
72.5
78.5
72.3
72.2
72.5
67.0
72.5
72.5
72.5
73.3
72.7
72.6
73.2
83.5
73-8
72.3
73.3
?n?strihgiion
Dl strlbut Ion
Prior She>»f
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal
14933*
803.2
868.4
868.4
868.4
865.4
865-4
868.4
802.5
868.4
868.4
868.4
877.4
870.5
869.0
876.2
999.5
883-4
865.4
877.4
31467
0
31467
Fluid
Ret . In
Refuse
12933
*8,000 gallons applied by water truck during refuse placement.
6,993 gallons applied by 2.27"total rainfall during refuse
placement operation.
COUNTY OF SONOMA PLATE H-25A
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
1972
1-27
1-28
1-31
2- 1
2- 2
2-3
2-14
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
2-11
2-12
2-13
2-14
2-15
2-16
2-17
2-18
2-19
Leac
Start
(In)
49.4
60.6
39.5
9.4
19.5
31.1
1.2.2
34.8
II .0
22.8
34.0
35. 1
45.6
25.1
39.3
53. 1
14.4
34.3
58.3
32.4
late Coll ect i on
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .4
2.0
24. 1
22 . 7
1 .0
1 .k
6.0
Total
(In)
59-6
38.5
40.8
32.8
9.9
12.4
1.4.6
51 .7
52.3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
713.4
460.8
488.4
392.6
118.5
271.7
533.9
618.8
626.0
4224
2000
6224
01 st r i but Ion
Start
(In)
72.8
74.3
72.5
73.0
71 .5
oo.o
00.0
71.4
72.2
72.4
72.5
72.9
1 .0
1 .0
72.5
72.4
72.2
72.5
72.5
72.6
End
(In)
0.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 .0
I .5
1 .6
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .2
1 .0
1 .0
1 .4
1 .0
Total
(In)
72.8
74.3
65-8
73-0
.71.5
00.0
00.0
71.4
71.2
70.9
70.9
71 .9
00.0
00.0
71 .5
71.2
71 .2
71 . 5
71.1
71.6
?h?rine'.i°n
01 st r ibut Ion
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal
871 .4
889-3
787.6
873.8
855.9
000.0
000 .0
854.7
852.3
848. 7
84R. 7
860.6
000. 0
000. 0
855.9
852. 3
852. 3
855.9
851 . 1
857. 1
13668
31467
45135
Fluid
Ret . 1 n
Refuse
29625
30054
32082
31690
34127
34704
35031
35268
37202
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-25
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Oat*
1972
TTo
2-21
2-22
2-23
2-24
2-25
2-26
2-27
2-28
2-29
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
3-10
3-M
Leae
Start
(In)
60.3
33.2
62.2
31.1
67.5
24.0
54.7
30.3
64.5
48.2
37.8
42.9
44. 1
45.5
40.7
42.3
45.0
44.3
47.9
46.8
49.1
[late Co
End
(In)
5.0
I .0
1 .0
4.0
6.0
1.6
5.0
6.0
6.0
5-0
5.0
5.0
5.0
6.0
5.0
5-0
5.1
1 lect ion
Total
(In)
55.3
61.2
66.5
50.7
58.5
47.2
32.8
36.9
38.1
40.5
35.7
37.3
40.0
38.3
42.9
41.8
44. 1
Leaehate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
661 .9
732.6
796.0
606.9
700.2
564.9
392.6
441.7
456. 1
484.8
427.3
446.5
478.8
458.5
513-5
500.3
527.9
9191
6224
15415
0 1 s t r i but i on
Start
(In)
72.8
72.5
73-2
72.8
72.3
72.9
72.3
72.5
72.3
74.5
72.5
72.5
72.7
72.7
72.7
72.9
72.6
72.8
72.9
72.9
72.8
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
4.3
13.3
28.2
1 .0
1 .0
3.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
2.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
Total
(In)
71.8
71 .5
68.9
59.5
44. 1
71 .9
71 .3
69-5
71 .3
73.5
71.5
71.5
71.7
71.7
71.7
70.9
71.6
71-8
71.9
71.9
Shtrine-ei0"
01 stribut ion
Prior Shee t
Total Distr 1 but ion
Total
(Gal
859.4
855-9
824.7
712.2
527.9
860.6
B53-5
B3I.9
853.5
879. 8
855.9
855.9
H58.2
858.2
858.2
848. 7
B57.I
859.4
B60.6
860. 6
16632
45135
61767
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
38249
39231
39972
40754
41739
42028
42515
42929
43329
43702
44133
44545
44915
45313
45659
46020
46352
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-25 C
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
1972
3-12
3-13
3-14
3-15
3-16
^eac
Start
(in)
46.6
45-3
49-6
51.4
61.7
hate Col lect i
End
(In)
5.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
6.4
Total
(In)
41.6
41.3
44.6
46.4
55.3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
on
Total
(Gal)
497.9
494.4
533-9
555.4
661 .9
2743
15415
18158
Dl stribut ion
Start
(In)
72.9
72.9
73.0
73.0
1 .0
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
Total
(In)
71 .8
71.9
71.9
72.0
72.0
?h?JrSneuei°n
D i s t r i but i on
Prior Sheet
Tola 1 Di s t r i bu t i on
Total
(Gal
859.4
860.6
860.6
861 .8
861 . 8
4304
SI767
&607I
Fluid
Ret . In
Refuse
46714
47080
47407
47714
47913
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-25 D
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
3-16-72
3-17-72
3-24-72
3-26-72
3-28-72
3-30-72
4-1-72
4-5-72
4-7-72
4-10-72
4-11-72
4-14-72
4-21-72
4-28-72
5^8-72
5-11-72
5-17-72
5-23-72
5-31-72
6-9-72
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng
000
362
3822
5118
6293
7350
8475
11193
12556
14592
15391
17734
22072
27102
33540
35191
39010
42251
46622
52567
Leech* te This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Cs Uons
Leachate
Generated
362
3460
1296
1175
1057
1125
2718
1363
2036
799
2343
4338
5030
6438
1651
-
3819
3241
4371
5945
52567
18158
70725
Distribution
Meter
Read i ng
000
1233
6771
8366
9881
11810
13412
16692
19264
21901
. 23438
26352
33368
40303
49330
51477
56302
60010
64931
71820
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
1233
5538
1595
1515
1929
1602
3280
2572
2637
1537
2914
70)6
6935
9027
2147
4825
3708
4921
6389
71820
66071
M78<»i
Fluid
.''.eta i ned
in
Refuse
48784
50862
51 161
51501
52373
52850
53412
54621
55222
55960
56531
59209
61 1 14
63703
64199
65205
65672
66222
67166
County of Sonoma
Plate H-25 E
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Dale
6-16-72
6-23-72
6-29-72
7-3-72
7-10-72
7-18-72
7-25-72
8-1-72
8-9-72
8- 14-72
8-22-72
8-30-72
9-5-72
9-18-72
9-27-72
10-3-72
\0-\0-72
10-19-72
11-7-72
1 1-16-72
Leacha te Co 1 1 ec t i on
Meter
Read i ng
56238
59299
60956
63070
66970
71700
76070
80164
84360
87394
92050
94164
94164
101230
106400
1 10395
1 14430
122560
1 35080
140590
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate ""or Sheet
Totai Leachate
Total Cations
Leachate
Generated
3721
301 1
1657
2114
3900
4730
4370
4094
4196
3034
4656
2114
(3300)*
7066
51 70
3995
4035
8130
12520
5510
91323
70725
162048
Disr.r ibution
Meter
Read i ng
75667
78685
80052
83760
89020
95270
100766
106140
. 1 1 1880
1 1 5860
121623
126490
1 30740
1 40100
146490
151020
155790
161580
173450
178370
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
384?
3018
1 367
3708
5260
6250
5496
5374
5740
3980
5763
4867
4250
9360
6390
4530
4770
5790
1 1870
4920
106550
137891
244441
Fluid
.''.eta i ned
i n
Refuse
67292
67299
67009
67603
69963
71483
72609
73889
75433
7637"
77486
80233
81 189
R3483
84703
85238
85973
83633
82983
82393
* Collection line broke and leachate neneration data durino this
County of Sonoma
Plate H-25 F
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
ro
o>
ro
Date
11-27-72
12-6-72
12-1 1-72
12- 18-72
12-26-72
1-4-73
1-11-73
1-18-73
1-26-73
2-1-73
2-8-73
2-15-73
2-22-73
3-1-73
3-8-73
3-15-72
3-22-73
3-29-73
4-5-73
4-12-73
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
147780
153130
156050
157880
160990
166040
170620
175*10
180095
183170
186460
189450
192160
193790
195650
200460
204130
207690
210990
215170
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Ca lions
Leachate
Generated
7190
5350
2920
1830
3110
5050
4580
4790
4685
3075
3290
2990
2710
1630
I860
4810
3670
3560
3300
4180
74580
162046
236628
Distribution
Neter
Reading
185920
191030
192770
192770
196410
202900
208500
212950
217930
220800
224740
227920
229680
231390
23'tl 10
240040
245020
250740
255940
261 ISO
Uisir ib'jlion
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
7550
51 10
17*0
0
3640
6490
5600
4450
4°PO
2870
3940
3180
1760
I7IC
2720
5930
49P-C
5720
5200
5210
82780
244441 .-.
327221
Fluid
Detained
in
Refuse
82753
82513
81333
79503
80033
81473
82493
82253
82548
82343
82993
83183
82233
82313
83173
84293
85603
87763
89663
90693
County of Sonoma
Plate H-25
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
4-19-73
4-26-73
5-3-73
5-10-73
5-17-73
5-24-73
5-31-73
6-7-73
6-14-73
6-21-73
6-28-73
7-5-73
7-12-73
7-19-73
7-26-73
8-2-73
8-9-73
8-16-73
8-23-73
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
217370
220350
222580
224310
226740
227930
229130
23101)0
233340
236250
238220
240940
242760
245710
2482 10
250060
253610
2S633C
258540 .
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Ha lions
Leachate
Generated
2200
2980
2230
1730
21(30
1 190
1200
1910
2300
2910
1970
2720
1820
2950
2500
1850
3550
2720
2210
43370
236628
279998
Distribution
' Meter
Reading
261520
265760
269550
271710
277790
282060
283750
288650
292*100
297020
300000
304990
308060
313320
317320
322080
326660
3:0550
333^00
Distribution
This Sheet
Dis tr i but ion
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
370
4240
3790
2 160
6080
<(270
1690
4900
3750
lt620
2980
1(990
3070
5260
4000
4760
4580
3890
3350
72750
327221
399971
Fluid
detained
in
Refuse
88863
91123
91683
92 11 3
95763
9E843
99333
102323
103773
105483
106493
108763
110013
1 12323
113823
116733
1 17763
118933
120073
County of Sonoma
Piste H-25 H
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
8-30-73
9-6-73
9-14-73
9-21-73
9-JE-73
10-5-73
10-12-73
10-19-73
10-26-73
1 1-2-73
1 1-9-73
1 1-16-73
1 1-23-73
1 1-30-73
12-7-73
12-14-73
12-21-73
12-2R-73
I-4-74
1-11-7*
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
261900
265410
267950
269900
271610
273380
275320
277630
280820
283800
2fi°490
29«P20
305970
3091 to
31 t?00
3 159 SO
320500
32G4RO
332970
3381(70
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Callorii
Loachate
Generated
3360
3510
2540
1950
1710
1 770
1940
2310
3190
2980
• ' Q ";
T330
7150
4T9°"
1, 2 4 0 *
4080
4520
5 9 3 o
6490
5500
8J230
27999?
363228
Distribution
Meter
Read i ng
339270
344365
346720
345760
351 160
353640
355970
360930
363540
369920
175270
3PT170
3^550
3T7TT
3°2(<,5'5
3D5PIO
39?rno
403871
407670
411060
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
5370
5095
2355
3040
1400
2480
2330
4960
2610
6380
5150
5710
55eO
3240
2 "61
3160
orinn
4070
3800
3390
77160
399971
477131
Fluid
.''.etained
in
Refuse
1 2 2 0 8 3
123668
1234?3
124573
121.263
124973
125363
12801 3
127433
1 30833
130493
12', °f. 3
1 2 r, 2 " 3
123543
I22K3
121243
120713
i rro?
1 161 13
1 14003
An estimated amount of leachatc lost due to eouipnent failure
was fiaured into this total.
County of Sonoma Piste H-25 I
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Dale
1-18-74
1-30-711
2-8-74
2-15-714
2-22-74
3-4-74
3-8-74
3-15-74
3-22-74
3-29-74
4-3-74
14- 1 2- 74
4- 19- 7!)
4-26-7^
5-3-74
5-10-7'
5-20-7'
5-24-7'
5-31-7'
6-7-74
Leachate Col lection
Meter
Read i ng
344200
351220
355190
357710
36031*0
3&l4l 10
365470
368370
371230
374230
377290
380610
383510
3861*10
3888UO
391070
393370
394500
39661*0
398590
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Rations
Leachate
Generated
5730
7020
3970
2520
2630
3770
1 360
2900
2860
3000
3060
3320
2900
2900
2430
2230
2300
1 1 30
211*0
1950
60120
363228
423348
Distribution
Meter
Read'ng
414610
419800
422540
425420
<*27I *0
428700
<*29270
433300
436090
438530
440020
443830
446830
449630
451 740
455090
457950
460060
462930
466360
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
3550
5190
2740
2880
1 720
1560
570
4030
2790
2440
1 490
3810
3000
2800
2110
3350
2860
2110
2870
3430
55300
477131
532431
Fluid
detained
in
Refuse
1 1 1623
109993
108763
109123
1082 1 3
106003
10521 3
106343
106273
105713
i 041 1*3
104&33
104733
104633
10431 3
105433
105993
106973
1C 770 2
i 09 183
County of Sonoma
Plate H-25 J
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
6-14-74
6-21-74
6-27-74
7-5-7*1
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
400610
402370
404620
406870
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gallons
Leachate
Generated
2020
1760
2250 "
2250
8280
423348
431628
Distribution
Meter
Reading
469520
473230
477770
482320
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
3160
3710
4540
4550
15960
532431
548391
Fluid
.".etained
in
Refuse
110323
112273
114563
1 16863
ro
County of Sonoma
Plate H-25 K
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL"0"
Date
*
1971
12OO
12-31
~^3
I-*
1-5
1-7
1-10
l-ll
1-12
1-13
1-1*
1-15
1-17
1-18
1-19
1-20
1-21
1-2*
1-25
1-26
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
70.0
5.6
27. S
27.6
27.9
28.5
28.8
30.0
31.8
46.0
48.8
58.8
26.2
3*.*
*9.7
73.4
23.*
69.9
12.3
17.*
End
(In)
1.3
1.0
1.0
1 .0
1.0
1.0
Total
(In)
56.5
72.*
22.*
68.9
11.3
16.*
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
.(Gal)
1500*
679.7
866.6
268.1
82*. 7
135.3
196.3
*»7I
0
**7I
Distribution
Start
(In)
56.6
70.6
73-8
73.3
72.2
73.3
72.5
- 72.0
72.0
72.0
71.0
56.*
71 .5
71.1
71.2
71.2
76.2
69.*
62.3
70.9
Th?Jrs
End
(In)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1 .0
1 .0
9.3
Total
(In)
56.6
70.6
73.8
73.3
72.2
73.3
72.5
72.0
72.0
72.0
71.0
56.*
71.5
71.1
71-2
70.7
75.2
68.*
53.0
button
heet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal)
80630
682.2
851 .8
889.5
883.5
871.*
883.5
87*.*
868.*
868.*
868.*
856.3
679.9
867.2
857.3
858.7
852.6
906.9
82*. 9
639.2
239*8
0
239*8
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
6563
15281
17678
18262
183**
1903*
19*77
•8,063 gallons of rain water added during refuse placement.
1,500 gallons of leachate generated during refuse placement.
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26 A
FLUID ROUTING CELL"D'
Date
1972
1-27
1-28
1-31
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-*
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
2-1 1
2-12
2-13
2-1*
2-15
2-16
2-17
2-18
2-19
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
27.3
33.*
81.5
16.5
22. l>
*2.8
1(2.0
81.*
16.5
20.6
*l .6
*7.6
48.2
*7.5
31.8
*0.6
39.2
*2.6
*2.6
*3.3
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
2.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
2.0
1 .0
1 .0
2.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .5
1 .0
1 .0
Total
(In)
26.3
32.*
79.5
15.5
21 .*
*1 .8
*l .0
79.*
15.5
19.6
39.6
46.6
*7.2
*6.5
30.8
. 39.6
38.2
*l . 1
*) .6
*2.3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
31*. 8
387.8
951 .6
185.5
256.2
500.3
*90.7
950.*
185-5
23*. 6
47*. 0
557.8
56*. 9
556.6
368.7
*7*.0
*57.3
492.0
497.9
506.3
1*07
4*71
13878
D 1st ri but Ion
Start
(In)
72.5
70.7
72.5
70.5
71.6
*5.1
43.1
72.3
71.*
72.9
72.8
70.2
65-3
62.*
73-0
73. 1
72. 1
71 .1
71 .2
72.6
Olstr 1
This S
End
(In)
0.0
10.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.3
2.0
I 1 .0
14.8
15.3
13-5
22.0
19.3
23.3
19.7
21.1
19.0
Total
(In)
70.9
61 .6
70.7
72.5
70.5
71.6
45.1
*3.1
60.0
69-*
61.9
58.0
5*. 9
51.8
40.4
53.7
49-8
52.*
50.0
52.2
but i on
heet
Dlst r Ibut Ion
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal)
855-1
7*2.9
852.6
875.0
850.9
86*. 1
5*4.3
520.2
724.1
837.6
7*7. 1
700.0
662.6
625-2
487.6
648. 1
601 .0
632.4
603.5
630.0
1400*
239*8
37952
Fluid
Re t . In
Refuse
20017
20372
20273
20963
21557
21921
21975
215*5
22083
22686
22959
23102
23199
23268
23387
23561
23705
238*5
23951
2*07*
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL"0"
Date
1972
2-20
2-21
2-22
2-23
2-2*
2-25
2-26
2-27
2-28
2-29
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
3-10
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
41.3
37-5
33.7
37.8
52.4
46.7
58.9
50.9
55.3
62.3
60.5
60.8
60.8
66.5
59.9
61 .0
64.5
60.7
59.7
60.7
End
(In)
1.0
1 .0
1.0
2.0
11.8
2.0
1.0
1 .0
2.0
'•0
2.0
2.0
3-0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1 .0
2.0
3-0
2.0
Total
(In)
40.3
36.5
32.7
35.8
40.6
44.7
57.9
49.9
53.3
61.3
58.5
58.8
57.8
64.5
57.9
59.0
63-5
58.7
56.7
58.7
Leachate This Sheet
Leechote Prlqr Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
482.4
436.9
391.4
428.5
485.9
535.1
693.1
597.3
638.0
733.8
700.2
703.8
691.9
772.1
690.7
706.2
760. 1
702.6
678.7
702.6
12531
13878
26409
Distribution
Start
(In)
72.5
72.9
72.3
81 .0
72.7
72.3
72.3
72.5
72.3
72. 1
72.8
72.6
72.8
72.9
72.9
72.9
73.0
72.9
72.8
73.0
T-h?strS
End
(In)
21.4
23.4
28.2
31.6
1.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 .0
0.0
1.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1.0
Total
(In)
51.2
49. 1
44.7
40.7
80.0
71-7
71.3
71-3
71.5
71 .3
71.1
71.8
71.6
72.8
71 .9
71.9
71.9
72.0
71.9
71.8
72.0
>u 1 1 on
heet
Distribution
Prior Sheot
Total Di st r i but Ion
Total
(Gal)
617.9
592.6
539.5
491 .2
965.5
865.3
860.5
860.5
862.9
860.5
858.1
866.5
864. 1
878.6
867.8
867.8
867.8
868.9
867.8
866.5
868.9
17059
37552
55011
Fluid
Ret . In
Refuse
24210
24365
24514
2*576
25056
25386
25553
25817
26042
26168
26326
26489
26661
26768
26945
27106
27214
27380
27569
27733
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26
FLUID ROUTING CELL"D'
Data
1972
3-11
3-12
3-13
3-14
3-15
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
58.1.
55.0
54.8
61.1
59.6
Leach
pump i
End
'(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
>te ad
ig ope
Total
(In)
57. 4
511.0
53.8
60. 1
58.6
us t men
a t i on
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
687. 1
61)6. it
643.9
719. 4
701 .4
for
506.5
4905
261)09
31314
Di s t ribut ion
Start
(In)
73.0
72.9
73.0
72.9
73.0
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .1
1 .0
i .0
Total
(In)
72.0
71.9
72 .0
71.9
72.0
?i S t r i but i on
his Sheet
DI s t r 1 but i on
Prior Sheet
Total Di s t r i but i on
Total
(Gal)
868.9
867.8
868.9
867. R
868.9
4343
5501 1
59354
Fluid
.Ret. In
Refuse
27915
2P138
28361
2851 1
28t77
28040
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26 0
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "0"
Date
3-15-72
3-16-72
3-17-72
3-24-72
3-26-72
3-28-72
3-30-72
it-1-72
4-5-72
4-7-72
4-10-72
4-11-72
4-14-72
4-21-72
4-28-72
5-8-72
5-11-72
5-17-72
5-23-72
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng
1
000
889
1673
6917
8390
9921
11643
13352
17395
19574
22051
23133
26420
33072
42378
52260
54547
59062
63282
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Loachete
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
889
673
5117
1290
1301
1403
1392
3765
1774
2264
833
3120
6652
8928
9882
2287
4302
3882
59754
31314
91068
Distribution (Leachate 6 Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Read I ng
3
000
1000
1800
7100
8620
10240
11960
13630
17800
19787
22300
23300
26420
33450
42378
52260
54760
59400
63800
Gallons
Added
(3-D
4
1 1 1
127
183
230
319
317
278
405
213
249
167
0
378
0
0
213
338
518
Distribution
This Sh«at
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4+2)
5
1000
800
5300
1520
1620
1720
1670
4170
1987
2513
1000
3120
7030
8928
9882
2500
4640
4400
63800
59354
123154
Fluid
P.eta i ned
in
Refuse
(4+6)
6
28151
28278
28461
28691
29010
29327
29605
30010
30223
30472
30639
30639
31017
31017
31017
31230
31568
32086
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26 E
FLUID ROUTING CELL "0"
Date
5-31-72
6-9-72
6-1 6-72
6-23-72
6-29-72
7-3-72
7-10-72
7-18-72
7-25-72
8- 1-72
8-9-72
8-14-72
8-22-72
8-30-72
9-5-72
9-18-72
9-27-72
10-3-72
Leachate Collection
MAt«r
neier
Read i ng
1
69953'
78027
83347
8?513
95122
99470
101(570
112217
1 191(20
125680
132053
136268
143744
150919
156li75
165567
172050
I76ll|li
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachatc
Prior Sheet
Total leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
6153
7577
4947
5596
5054
3840
1.950
7467
6700
6060
6103
1)068
7144
7019
5025
8797
52*3
3404
'•756
109903
91068
200971
Distribution (Leachate t Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Readl ng
3
70450
781.00
83917
90068
9563"
99620
10
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL ''0"
Date
10-10-72
10-19-72
11-7-72
11-16-72
11-27-72
12-6-72
12-1 1-72
12-18-72
12-26-72
1-4-73
1-11-73
1-18-73
1-26-73
2-1-73
2-8-73
2-15-73
2-22-73
3-1-73
3-8-73
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
1
181961
193070
209710
227890
2*9750
262910
268450
274020
293550
314290
329580
357350
392160
418640
450770
484430
518560
551560
584850
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
9070
16640
15340
21860
13160
7940*
5570 .
19530
20740
15290
27770
34810
26480
32130
33660
34130
33000
33290
400410
200971
601381
Distribution (Leachate & Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Reading
3
184000
193070
212550
227890
249750
262910
268450
274020
293550
314290
329580
357350
392160
418640
450770
484430
518560
551560
584850
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
4
0
2840
0
0
0
-2400*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Distribution
This Sheet
DIstributicn
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4*2)
5
9070
19480
15340
21860
13160
•
5540
5570
19530
20740
15290
27770
34810
26480
32130
33660
34130
33000
33290
400850
243354
644204
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
(4+6)
6
42383
45223
45223
45223
45223
42823
42B23
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
* 2,400 gallons leachate lost on Dec. 9, 1972, due to frozer
leachate return line.
COUNTY OF SONOMA PLATE H-26G
FLUID ROUTING CELL "P-'
Date
3-15-73
3-22-73
3-29-73
4-5-73
4-12-73
4-19-73
4-26-73
5-3-73
5-10-73
5-17-73
5-2li-73
5-31-73
6-7-73
6-14-73
6-21-73
6-28-73
7-5-73
7-12-73
Leachate Col lection
Mftftr
mvf
Reading
1
6 151)20
61)1600
664300
684020
697580
706120
712727
718603
724792.
729941
734398
740773
747340
755397
762386
768552
774599
781260
leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
30570
26180
23300
19120
13560
8540
£607
5643
5882
4991
4028
6193
6000
7257
6571
5402
5949
5300
3«93
19493
601381
796364
Distribution (Leachate I Fresh Water)
Fresh Wate' Added
Meter
Read i ny
3
615420
641600
664900
6R4020
697580
706120
712960
718910
724950
730370
7345PO
741 140
748140
755RI5
7C3150
76Rf 50
775960
781890
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
18
764
1R
1361
630
1*90
Uistr ibut ion
This Sheet
Dlstr i'but >cn
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4*2)
5
30570
26180
26 180
19120
13560
8540
6P40
5950
6040
5420
42 10
6760
6800
7675
7335
5500
7310
5930
43PO
201420
644204
845624
Flu'd
Retained
i n
Refuse
(t+6)
6
42823
42B23
42P23
42823
42823
42423
42656
42963
431 2 1
43550
43732
4429?
j
4509°
455 1 7
16281
46379
47740
48370
43860
400 qallons leachate lost due to equipment failure.
COUNTY OF SONOMA
HLATl H-26 H
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "D"
Date
7-19-73
7-26-73
8-2-73
8-9-73
8-16-73
8-23-73
8-30-73
9-6-73
9-l*-73
9-21-73
9-28-73
10-5-73
10-12-73
10-19-73
10-26-73
1 1-2-73
1 1-9-73
11-16-73
1 1-23-73
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng
1
785780
790909
7969*0
805382
812777
819099
826090
832967
838238
81(11506
851070
857130
8631100
869979
8795*0
886*53
893870
90*270
913920
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
*639
5120
7512
6237
61*9
6810
6337
5008
6186
6000
6060
6110
6579
8*60
62*3
7060
101 10
9650
120270
79636*
91663*
Distribution (Leachate S Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Read i ng
3
786270
791820
797870
8065*0
8)2950
819280
826630
833230
838320
8*5070
851070
857290
863*00
871080
880210
886810
89*160
90*270
913920
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
it
911
930
1 158
173
181
5*0
263
82
56*
0
160
0
1101
670
357
290
0
0
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(*+2)
5
5550
6050
8670
6*10
6330
7350
6600
5090
6750
6000
6220
6110
7680
9130
6600
7350
101 10
9650
127650
8*562*
97327*
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
(*+6)
6
*977I
50701
51859
52032 '
52213
52753
53016
53098
53662
53662
53822
53822
5*923
55593
55950
562*0
562*0
562*0
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26
FLUID ROUTING CELL "D"
Date
1 1-30-73
12-7-73
12-l*-73
12-21-73
12-28-73
l-*-7*
1-11-7*
1-18-7*
1-30-7'
2-8-7*
2-15-7'
2-22-7*
3-*-7*
3-8-7*
3-15-7*
3-22-71
3-29-7*
*-3-7*
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
1
92 121)0
928230
933&'-0
939680
9*71*0
956290
966390
97*500
992220
997920
1006203
1018220
103831(0
101)8100
106*390
1078860
1096810
1 1 15710
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3
2
7320
6990
5610
5?*0
7HO
9150
10100
8110
17720
7700*
8283
10680
20120
9760
16290
1**70
17950
18900
202*53
91 663*
1 1 19087
Distribution (Leachate & Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Read i ng
3
9212*0
92R230
933«*0
9396TO
9*71*0
956290
966390
97*500
992220
997920
10075*0
101 8220
10383*0
10*8100
106*390
1078860
1096810
1 1 15710
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
I)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-2000*
1 337
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(**2)
5
7320
6990
5610
58*n
7'i60
9150
10100
81 10
17720
5700
9620.
10680
20120
9760
16290
l**70
17950
1 8900
201 790
97327*
1 1 7506*
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
;*+«)
6
5C24Q
562*0
5C240
562*0
£62*0
562
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "0"
f\i
•vl
O
Date
1-12-71
1-19-71
1-26-71
5-3-71
5-10-71
5-20-71
5-21.-71
5-31-71
6-7-71
6-11-71
6-20-71
6-27-71
7-5-71
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng
1
1 117120
I 169010
II95260
1223600
1231920
1211280
1219075
1256905
"-1267098
.- .
1280678
1293389
1308310
1 313910
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-31
2
11710
21620
26220
28310
I 1320
9360
1795
7505
9028
12328
II 689
11200
5630
203715
1 1 19087
1 322832
Distribution (Leachate 4 Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Reading
3
1 117120
I 169010
1195260
1223600
1231920
1211280
1219100
1258070
1268350
1281700
12911 10
1308310
1313910
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
325
1 165
1252
1022
721
0
0
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(1*2)
5
11 710
21620
26220
28310
1 1 320
9360
5120
8670
10280
13350
12110
11200
5630
208230
1 1 75061
1383291
Fluid
P.etalned
in
Refuse
(1+6)
6
55577
55577
55577
55577
55577
55577
55902
57067
58319
59311
60062
60062
60062
COUNTY OF SONOMA
PLATE H-26 K
-------
APPENDIX I
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL A
DATE
EVENT
ADDED LIQUII
RAINFALL
IV 5/71
11/12/71
11/13/71
11/15/71
11/15/71
11/16/71
11/17/71
11/22/71
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (530.35 Tons)
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain
Cell Cover 1n Place
Shot Initial Settlement Elevation
0.29"
0.25"
0.02"
Compacted Refuse
Density 1064
272
PLATE I- 1
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL B
DATE
EVENT
ADDED LI QUID
RAINFALL
11/16/71
11/19/71
11/24/71
11/29/71
12/ 1/71
12/ 2/71
12/ 3/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 7/71
12/ 8/71
12/ 9/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
Started Placing Refuse
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell E
Resumed Refuse Placement
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (524.23 Tons)
Rain
Rain
Rain
Add Water from Water Truck
Add Water from Water Truck (69.25" 1n tank D as run
off from Cell B.
69.25" = 829 gallons)
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain
Rain
Cell Cover 1n Place
Compacted Refuse ,
Density 1052 #/ydJ
0.96"
0.50"
0.32"
0.24"
20,000 gal.
14,000 gal?
0.27"
0.09"
*14,000 gallons should be reduced by 829 gallons to
determine total moisture added to cell
PLATE I- 2
273
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL C
DATE
12/ 1/71
12/ 2/71
12/ 3/71
12/ 3/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 7/71
12/ 9/71
12/10/71
12/11/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/15/71
12/17/71
12/21/71
12/21/71
12/21/71
!
1
C
1
i
EVENT
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell E
Rain
Resumed Placing Refuse
Add Water from Water Truck (2,000 gal ran through
the cell and out the
tank)
Rain
Rain
Rain
Rain
Add Water from Water Truck
Finished Placing Refuse (521.72 tons)
Began Placing Muck Sand
Rain
Started Placing Distribution System
Started Placing Cell Cover
Cell Cover 1n Place
405 gal. Leachate pumped from bottom tank and
discarded
Compacted Refuse ,
Density 1064 #/ydJ
*4,000 gallons should be reduced by 2,000 gallons
to determine total moisture added to cell.
WED LIQUID
4.000*
4,000 gal.
- 405 gal .
RAINFALL
0.50"
0.32"
0.24"
0.27"
0.09"
0.03"
0.77"
0.05"
PLATE I- 3
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL D
DATE
EVENT
ADDED LIQUII
RAINFALL
12/13/71
12/15/71
12/22/71
12/23/71
12/23/71
12/24/71
12/27/71
12/28/71
12/29/71
12/29/71
12/29/71
12/30/71
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (530.97 Tons)
Rain
Rain - Leachate Collection Tank at bottom of Cell D
was full and overflowing. Leachate held for
recycling. Estimated volume, 1,500 gal.
Pea Gravel Placed for Distribution System
Rain
Distribution System Installed
Started Placing Cell Cover
Cell Cover 1n Place
Compacted Refuse ,
Density 1065 #/ydJ
- 1,500
0.05"
0.51"
0.22"
0.06"
1.77"
0.03"
275
PLATE I- l»
-------
TES'fBeELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL E
DATE
11/15/7*
11/16/71
11/16/71
11/16/71
11/17/71
11/18/71
11/19/71
11/22/71
11/22/71
11/23/71
11/24/71
11/29/71
11/30/71
12/1/71
12/2/71
12/2/71
12/3/71
12/3/71
12/3/71
12/6/71
12/6/71
12/6/71
12/7/71
12/8/71
12/9/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
12/11/71
12/11/71
12/12/71
EVENT
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Septic Pumplngs
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell B(@Ton
180.2
Septic Pumpings
Sept I c Pump 1 ngs
Septic Pumptngs
Resumed Refuse Placement
Septic Pumplngs
Septic Pumpings
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell 8(8 Ton
Rain
Septic Pumpings
Septic Pumpings
Septic Pumpings
Rain
Rain
Resumed Refuse Placement
Sept 1 c Pump i ngs
Rain
Septic Pumpings
Finished Placing Refuse (521.93 Tons)
Septic Pumplngs
Septic Pumpings
Rain
Rain
Septic Pumplngs
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain '
Septic Pumpings
Cel 1 Cover In Place:
Refuse Density 1047 I/yd3
\DDED LIQUID
1,000 gal
)
1,000 Gal
800 Gal
2,200 Gal
2,200 Gal
1 ,000 Gal
2,200 Gal
2,600 gal
1,000 gal
1 ,000 gal
2,000 gal
3,800 gal
2,100 gal
3,300 gal
1 ,000 gal
RAINFALL
0.02"
0.96"
0.50"
0.32"
0.24"
0.27"
0.09"
0.03"
276
PLATE I- 5
------- |