EPA.PU480.PR. 5-532-6
               :S FOR CONSTRUCTING
               NDERGROUND
               'JNJECTION OF PLASTICS
            U; S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            OFflCE OF RESEARCH AND DEVOLOPMENT
            ROBERT S.KERR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
            ADA, OKLAHOMA 74820

-------
    TECHNIQUES FOR CONSTRUCTING UNDERGROUND
         BARRIERS BY  INJECTION OF  PLASTICS
                           By
                     Bolesiaw Jacenkow
       Institute  of Meteorology and  Water Management
                     Warsaw, Poland
                  Project No  PR-5-532-6
                     Project Officer
                   William C . G alegar
     Robert S .Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
                   Ada,  Oklahoma  74820
       U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
ROBERT S.KERR  ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
                    ADA, OKLAHOMA 74820

-------
                          DISCLAIMER
This report has been  reviewed by the Robert S.  Kerr Environmental Rese-
arch Laboratory  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency,  and  approved for
publication. Approval does not signify that  the  contents necessarily reflect
the views  and  policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  nor
does mention of trade names or commercial  products  constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use .
                                 11

-------
                          ABSTRACT
At the present  state of development of industry and agriculture it is imposs-
ible to avoid, in many cases,  the penetration of pollutants into the  soil. One
of the basic method of the protection of underground waters against pollution
is confining the contaminated  areas by means of vertical and  horizontal
waterproof  curtains. In recent year  the procedure of carrying out the curtains
through the  grouting of chemical components into  the soil has been developed.

The method for synthesis of two types  of resins  (ureal-formaldehyde,  modified
with pyrosulphate of sodium)  has been elaborated, thus obtaining the  resins
suitable to the grouting, of  a viscosity close to that of water.  A number of
hardeners on the basis on acid solutions or salts  have been  selected and exam-
ined.  They enable to control the gelation time  from a few minutes to  tens  of
hours. The  obtained resin compositions endow the soil, after stabilization,
with strength from a few to  150 kg/cm-^  and decrease the permeability to
10'l^cm/sec. The aceton-formaldehyde and phenol-formaldehyde resins have
been also examined. Depending upon the composition, the resins can  be
applied in acid,  neutral and alkaline soils.

The  investigations have been carried out with regard to ageing the stabilized
soil  samples kept in water  and on the air.  The trials of explaining the process
of ageing and determining its  factors have been made.
Mathematical model of the  grouting process has  been  elaborated to- enable
performing the project of the  grouting, selecting  a suitable  composition
of the grout as well as  elaborating the technology of pumping.

A few series of laboratory and field investigations have beeii carried  out for
determining the possibility  of utilizing the elaborated resins for soil  stabil-
ization. Bulbs, piles,  rings,  horizontal and vertical curtains have been
performed.  The investigations have been done in  watered and  unwatered
soils,  during confined or  unconfined   grout flov as well as in homogeneous
and heterogeneous soil media. The investigations have  proved the correc-
tness of the elaborated mathematical  model and showed the usefulness  of
the elaborated grouts.
This report was  submitted in fulfilment of the Project No.  PR-5-532-G
by the Department of Underground Water Hydrodynamics,    the Institute
of Meteorology and Water Management, under sponsorship  of the  Environ-
mental Protection Agency.  Work was completed on 31. XII. 1975.

                                  Ill

-------
                            CONTENTS


Sections                                                               Page

I     Introduction                                                       1
II     Summary                                                         2

III    Conclusions                                                       4

IV    Recommendations                                                 5

V     Review of literature                                               6

VI    Synthesis of low - viscosity urea formaldehyde resins
      and their modification by sodic pyrosulphite  and
      properties of  stabilized soils                                    12

VII   Influence of plasticization  of SP -  modified UF resins
      on properties  of soils stabilized by them                        47

VIII  Ageing  changes in soils stabilized by SP  modified UF
      resins                                                            55

IX    Basic  grouts                                                     82

X     Methodology of investigation                                      98

XI    Methods  for computation of grout flow                           107

XII   Laboratory  investigations of  grouting process                   131

XIII  Field  investigations                                             175

XIV  References                                                      200

XV   Bibliography                                                    205

XVI  Appendix A . Printouts of programs for computations
      of injection                                                     206

XVII  Appendix B. Photos of the blocks obtained on the laboratory
      and field investigations of grouting                               221
                               rv

-------
                             FIGURES

No

1     Soil limits for grout inject!vity
2     IR spectrum  of colliodal deposit isolated from UF
      resin (1) and hardened UF resin (2)                             14

3     IR spectrum of hardened UF  resin  (1) and  UF
      resin modified by SP (2)                                        14
4     Function diagrams  •t - f  (Dr) for  UF resin
      modified by SP                                                 22
5     The  influence  of F : U molar ratio during the
      resin synthesis on the strength properties of the
      samples  of the stabilized soil ( before the  stabili-
      zation U  was  dissolved in the resin in  quantity
      indispensible  to obtain molar ratio F : U = 2, 1 :l)               25

6     Dependence  of compressive   strength of soil
      samples  stabilized  with  UF resins  modified by SP
      on molar ratio  F : U.                                           26

7     Influence  of pH on  gelling time 30 percent UF
      resin solution modified by SP  hardened with oxalic
      acid                                                            28

8     Gelling  times of 30 percent  UF resins ( F.-U.-SP =
      2, 1 ;1:0, 003 )  hardened with ammonium chloride (1)
      and ammonium chloride  buffered with hexamethy-
      lenetetramine (urotropin ) in quantities : 0, 5g (2) ,
      l,0g(3), 2,0g(4), 3,0g(5). 4,0g(6) per 100ml
      of resin                                                        29
9     Gelling times  of 30 percent UF resin  solution
      (F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0,049 ) hardened with ammonium
      chloride(l) and ammonium   chloride buffered with
      hexamethylenetetramine ( urotropin ) in quantities :
      0,5g(2), l,0g(3), 2,0g(4)) 3.0g(5), 4,0g(6),
      per 100 ml of resin                                             30
10    Gelling  times of 30 percent  UF resin solution
      (F:U:SP= 2,1:1:0, 003) hardened  with ammonium
      chloride  buffered  with  thriethylenetetramine ( TETA)
      in quantitied :  0, 5 ml (l) ,  1  ml (2) ,  1, 5 ml ( 3) ,
      2, 5 ml (4 )  per 1 00 ml  of resin                                 31

11     Gelling time of 30  percent UF resin solution (F:U:SP =
                   V                              \
      = 2,1:1:0, 049) hardened with ammonium  chloride
      buffered  with thriethylenetetramine  TETA  in  quanti-
      ties: 0, 5 ml(l), 1  ml (2 ), 1, 5 ml ( 3 ) ,  2 ml (4 ) ,
      2, 5 ml (5) , per 100 rnl of resin                                32

                                   V

-------
 No                                                                  Pag<

12     The inHuence of UF resin(F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0,003)
       hardened with oxalic acid (1) ,  hydrochloric  acid
       buffered with monobasic ammonium  phosphate (2)
       and ammonium chloride ( 3 ) on  gelling times                      34

13     The influence of UF resins (F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0, 049)
       hardened with oxalic acid (1 ) ,   hydrochloric and
       buffered with monobasic ammonium phosphate ( 2 )
       and  ammonium  chloride ( 3 ) on gelling times                    35

14     Changes of viscosity during gelling time of 30 per-
       cent  UF resin solution (F;U:SP = 2, 1:1:0,049)
       hardened with oxalic acid                                        37

15     Changes of viscosity of 30 percent UF resin  solution
       (F:U:SP = 2,  1 ;1:0, 049 ) during  hardening with ammo-
       nium chloride (1) and ammonium chloride  buffered
       with  hexamethylenetetramine  in quantitied  0, 5g(2),
       2,0g(3) ,  and  4,0g(4)                                         38

16     Changes of viscosity ( 1) and  pH ( 2 ) of 30 percent
       UF  resin solution  (F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0,049) during
       hardening  with  ammonium  chloride  buffered with
       thriethylenetetramine                                            39

17     Compressive strength of soil samples  stabilized
       by  UF  resin  modified by SP  hardened  with oxalic
       acid                                                            41

18     Coefficients  of  permeability  k   of  soil  samples
       sealed  with  UF  resin  modified  by SP  hardened
       by  oxalic  acid                                                 42

19     Compressive strength of soil samples stabilized
       with  UF resin modified  by SP  hardened  with
       ammonium  chloride                                            44

20     Hardened  UF  resin modified  by PS of 30 percent
       concentration ( F:U:SP - 2,1:0,003) filling the space
       among 'sand grains. Enlargement  200 x. The picture
       of microsection  taken  by differential  method with
       use  of  MPI - 5 microscope                                      45

21     The   Compressive  strength  and the coefficient
       of permeability  of soil samples stabilized by SP
       modified  UF resin. The  strength  values for samples
       stored in water (l) and in the open air ( 2), the coeffi-
       cients of permeability  k  (3)                                     57
                               w

                                 VI

-------
No
22     The compressive strength and  the coefficient
       of permeability of soil samples stabilized by SP =
       modified UF resin of the molar ratio  F : U :  SP =
       = 2,1:1:0,049. The  compressive strength of samples
       stored in water (l) ,  and in the open  air (2 ) ,  the
       coefficient  of permeability of samples stored in wa-
       ter k   (3)
            w  ^  '
58
23     Changes of the  compressive strength of soil samples
       stabilized  by UF resin hardened by various  harde-
       ners : oxalic acid ( 1 ) ,  ammonium chloride ("2)  and
       muriatic  acid buffered  by monobasic  ammonium
       phosphate (3)                                                   59

24     Changes in the structure of the UF hardened  resin
       extracted  by water molar  ratio U:F (1) , K...
       coefficient  characterizing the cross-linkage   rate of
       the polymer,  ( 2 ) , K   coefficient characterizing the
       number  of methylol  groups in the polymer (3)                 63

25     Changes in the structure of the hardened UF resin
       extracted  by 0. 1 n  solution of  HC1,  molar  ratio
       U;F(l),  K.   coefficient  characterizing the  cross-
       linkage  rate of the polymer (2),  K»  coefficient
       characterizing  the number of methylol  groups in the
       polymer (3)                                                     64

26     Relative  changes of the compressive  strength of soil
       samples  stabilized by SP - modified UF resin stored
       in  water solutions  of muriatic  acid of  various pH              67

27     The compressive  strength of soil samples stabilized
       by UF resin stored in water (l) and in water  solutions
       of formaldehyde of pH 1. 7  and concentration  2 per-
       cent (2),  4  percent (3)  and 6 percent (4).                    70

28     Changes of the compressive strength of soil samples
       of  various  size grain stabilized by UF  resin  in the
       course  of storage in water at the pH 1.7: 1 - fraction
       0. 12 - 0. 30 mm,  2 -fraction  0. 30-0. 43 mm,   3-fraction
       0. 43- 0. 60 mm                                                 72

29     Diagram showing sites from which  samples  were
       taken out of the soil block stabilized by  means of grou-
       ting under field conditions                                      75


                                    VII

-------
No                                                                   Page

30     Changes of the  compressive  strength (l) and the  coeffi-
       cient of  permeability kw(2)  and the organic  matter
       content (3) as a function of the distance from the axis
       of the stabilized soil block                                       76

31     Changes of the structure of the hardened  UF resin
       as a function of the distance  from the  axis of  the
       stabilized  soil  block  molar  ratio  U:F, [ij ,  K^
       coefficient  characterizing  the cross-linkage rate
       of the polymer, (2J , K^  coefficient characterizing
       the  number  of methylol  groups in the polymer (3)              78

32     Changes in the formaldehyde  concentration (1),  pH (2J
       and  the K^ coefficient  characterizing the number
       of methylol  groups  in  the polymer (3)                          80

33     Uniaxial compressive strength of the soil samples
       stabilized  with AF resins  obtained at different F/A
       molar  ratio                                                    84

34     Coefficient  of  permeability  k for the soil samples
       stabilized  with AF resins  obtained  at different  F/A
       molar  ratio                                                    84

35     Dependence  between  the density and the content
       of dry   substance for AF-3P  resin  (hatched area
       the range of grouting AF resins)                               85

36     Dependence  between  viscosity and the content
       of dry substance for AF-3P  resin  (hatched area -
       the  range  of grouting AF resinsj                                85

37     The   influence  of AF-3P resin dilution on the strength
       of sandy soil stabilized with it (hatched area - the
       range of grouting AF resins)                                   87

38     The   course of  viscosity changes of AF grout hardened
       with  different quantities of 25 percent NaOH solution            88

39     The  course of  viscosity changes of AF grout hardened
       with 25 percent NaOH solution ( 25  part of hardener
       volume  per 100 part of  AF - 31  resin volume  ) in
       temperature :  1 - 295, 5° - 0, 2°K,   2 - 290, 5° -  0, 2°K,
       3 - 285,5° - 0,2°K,  4 - 280, 5° - 0, 2°K.                         89

                                  VIII

-------
No

40     Dependence of AF grout gelling time (AF-31 resin
       hardened v/ith 25 percent NaOH  solution in quantity
       of 25 part of volume  on the  temperature )                         90

41     Dependence  of mechanical resistance of stabilized
       soil on the degree  to which AF grout is dilute
       with  the hardener (25 percent water solution NaOHJ               91

42     Influence of ageing period  on the  mechanical
       resistance  of the soil samples stabilized with  AF
       grout                                                             91
43     The influence of  ageing period on the coefficient
       of  permeability k.   of the  soil samples stabilized
       with  AF  grout                                                   93
44     The  course of viscosity changes of FF  grout  at
       temperature                                                      95

45     The  influence of ageing period on the mechanical
       resistance  of the  soil  samples stabilized  with
       FF  grout                                                        96

46     The influence of ageing period on coefficient  of
       permeability  k   of the soil  samples  stabilized
       with  FF  grout                                                    96

47     Diagram  of the semi -  technical  installation for AF
       and UF  resin production                                        100

48     Diagram  of the  installation  for UF resin production             101

49     Diagram  of the instrument  for measuring  the  coeffi-
       cient  of  permeability  of samples                                105
50     Pattern  of the  grouting procces                                 109
51     Dependence  of time and of the injection rate on the
       radius range r  of the  grout,  according  to  the
       pattern A [computation with the programme A l)               113
52     Dependence of the  radius  range  r  of the grout
       and of the  injection rate on the injection duration,
       according to  the pattern A ( computation  with  the
       programme A 2j                                                 114

53     Time  discretization of  the function k  (t)                      115


                                   IX

-------
No

54     The axial-symmetrical ^ector of the filtration area
       with  situation in  the  j    time step, for the pattern B         115

55     Flowchart of the  program B  1                                H9

56     Dependence  of the radius range r^   and  the  rate
       of the injection Q on the duration of  the  injection t,
       for the pattern B  (computation according to the
       programme  B l)                                             I22

57     Dependence  of the radius range  r^   of   the grout
       the radius range of the  dilating  liquid r   and of
       the  injection  rate Q on the  duration  of the injection  t
       for  the pattern B (computation according to  the  progra-
       mme  B 2)                                                    123

58     Axial-symmetrical sector  of the filtration  area with
       situation in the  j   time step, for the pattern C               124

59     Flowchart of the program C  1                                127

60     Dependence  of the radius range r'B   of  the  grout
       and the  injection  rate on  the injection  duration,
       according to the  pattern C   (computation according
       to  the programme C l) .                                      129

61     Dependence  of the radius range r^   of  the  grout
       the  radius  range r   of the  dilating liquid and
       the  injection rate on  the  injection duration according
       to  the pattern C (computation according  to  the   pro-
       gramme  C 2)                                                130
 62     Basic  shapes of the stabilized  blocks by  grouting           132

 63     Model  for  investigation  of  the grouting                     133

 64     View  of the model for investigation of the grouting           134

 65     Models  of the soil media to be  injected                      136

 66     Method  for  injecting  a bulb (pile)                          137

 67     Method  for  injecting a ring                                  138

 68     Method for injecting a  horizontal  plate                      139

 69     Cross-sections of the bulbs obtained in the tests 1-6          149
 70     Cross-sections of the bulbs obtained in the tests 7-9          150
                                  X

-------
No
71     Bulb obtained in unsaturated  soil  [test l)                       151
72     Cross-section of the bulb obtained during unconfined
       grout  flow  (test 3)
73     Bulb  obtained during confined grout flow (test  7)               154
74     Cross-sections of the rings obtained in the  tests 10-15         157
75     Cross-sections of the  rings obtained in the  tests  16-21          158
76     Cross-section of  the ring obtained during unconfined
       grout  flow  (test 12)                                            161
77     Ring  obtained during confined  grout flow  (test 17)             162
78     Ring  obtained during  confined grout flow  (test 17)             163
79     Ring obtained  during  confined grout flow (test 20)               164
80     Cross-sections of the  horizontal  plates obtained
       in  the tests 22-27                                              167
81     Cross-sections of  the horizontal  plates obtained
       in  the tests 28-29                                              168
82     Horizontal  plate  obtained  in the test  28                       172
83     Horizontal  plate  obtained  in the  test 28                        173
84     Horizontal  plate  obtained  in the  test 29                       174
85     Vibrohammering  the  injection well                            176
86     Jetting the injection  well                                      176
87     Surface  sealing  for the  grouting  in unsaturated
       soils                                                           177
88     Set  1  of the  grouting  equipment                                180
89     Set  2  of the  grouting  equipment                                180
90     Cross-section of the  bulb injected in  unsaturated
       soil (tests  Tl - T3)                                            182
91     The bulb injected in unsaturated soil.(tests Tl - T3)             183
92     Cross-section of the bulb  injected  in unsaturated
       soil (test T4)                                                  184
93     The bulb injected  in  unsaturated  soil (test T4)                 185
94     Cross-section of the ring injected  in unsaturated
       soil (test T5)                                                   186

                                  XI

-------
 Np                                                                   Page
 95     The ring injected  in unsaturated soil  (test T5J                  187
 96     Cross-section of the ring injected in unsaturated
        soil  (test  T15)                                                188
 97     The ring injected in unsaturated soil  (test T15J                189
 98     Location of the blocks in vertical  curtain                       191
 99     Cross-section  of the vertical  curtain                          192
100     A part of the vertical  curtain   (tests T6 - T14J                193
101     A part of the vertical  curtain  (tests T10, T15,  T16)            194
102     Scheme of  the basin                                            195
103     Cross-section  of the blocks obtained in the  tests
        T17 - T20   vibrohammered injection well                      197
104     Cross-section  of the  blocks  obtained in the  tests
        T 21  - T28   the  jetted injection well                            198
                                 XII

-------
                               TABLES


 No                                                                    Pag

 1     Relative  costs of chemical grouts                                 8

 2     Properties of some UF resins applied to grouting                  9

 3     The influence of the temperature at which the first
       period  of addition reaction of F to U  is carried out
       on the stability of the obtained resins                             13

 4     Stability of SP unmodified and modified UF  resins
       of different molar  ratios F :U (resin  density =
       = 1. 200 -+- 1, 170 g/cm3 dry residue 40+ 48 percent)'             17

 5     Properties  of SP  modified resins obtained  in  semi-
       technical scale                                                  18

 6     Properties  of SP  modified  resins  obtained  in techni-
       cal  scale                                                       19

 7     Results  of the  elementary  analysis of the hardened
       UF  resin samples modified  by SP of  the molar ratio
       F:U:SP = 2, 1:1:0, 049 (the resin  was hardened  in the
       solution  by 30  percent hydrochloric  acid at pH 2)              20

 8     The values of the  angle of  boundary for the  phases
       resin  UF - quartz - air (resin  concentration 40 percent
       viscosity 14 cP,   temperature 293 K)                           21

 9     The properties  of UF resins  obtained at the molar
       ratio  F:U =  2, l-*-4:l                                             23

1 0     The properties  of the  resins modified  by SP obtained
       in  the laboratory                                                27

 11     Composition of the resin solutions hardened by hydro-
       chloric  acid buffered with monobasic ammonium
       phosphorat and gelling  times obtained at temp. 293°K             33

 12     Properties  of UF  resins modified  by addition  of
       different  quantities  of SP                                       43

 13     Influence of plasticization of SP - modified UF  resins
       by means of EG  on the  compressive  strength and  the
       coefficient  of permeability  of soils stabilized by them           48

 14     Influence of plasticization  of SP -  modified UF resins
       by  means of DEG  on the  compressive  strength of soils
       stabilized by them                                              49

                                 XIII

-------
No                                                                     £^

15     Influence of plasticization of SP  - modified UF
       resins  by means of FA on the compressive
       strength  and the coefficient  of  permeability
       of  soils  stabilized  by them                                     51

16     Influence of plasticization of SP -  modified UF
       resin  by means of CL on.the compressive strength
       and the coefficient  of permeability of soils stabi-
       lized by them                                                   52

17     Influence of AA  addition  to SP  -  modified UF
       resins  on the compressive strength and  the
       coefficient  of permeability  of soils stabilized
       by  them                                                         53

18     Mean  results of  elementary  analysis  of UF
       resin  extracted  by  distilled water and 0.1  n. HCL             65

19     Mean  uniaxial compressive strength  of sand  samples
       stabilized by UF  resins   stored  in solutions  of                66
       pH 2,0 -.- 0, 05

20     Mean  uniaxial compressive  strength  of sand samples
       stabilized by UF  resin  stored  in solutions  of acids
       and natrium salts                                              69

21     Mean  results of  elementary  analysis  of samples
       of  resin stabilizing soils and the  values:  F:U, K.
       and K  computed on  these  grounds                             77

22     Estimated  concentration  of  free formaldehyde
       and pH in  soil  samples  stabilized under  field
       conditions                                                       79

23     The influence  of various  molar ratios F/A  on the
       changes  of AF  resin  gelling  times                             83

24     Composition  of FF  grout                                      94

25     Compositions  of grouts                                        145

26     Results of laboratory investigations  - bulbs
       Types of models: A - unwatered  soil; B  - watered
       soil, unconfined  flow; C  - watered soil,  confined
       flow ;  D - watered and stratified soil,  unconfined
       flow                                                            146
                                   XIV

-------
No                                                                   page

27     Dimensions  of  bulbs                                         14?

28     Comparative coefficients  of injection  times
       and bulbs dimensions                                         148

29     Results  of  laboratory investigations   - rings                 155

30     Dimensions  of  rings                                         156

31     Comparative  coefficients  of injection times
       and rings dimensions                                         160

32     Results of laboratory  investigations  - horizontal
       plates                                                        166

33     Dimensions  of  horizontal plates                             169

34     Comparative  coefficients  of  dimensions
       of horizontal plates                                           170

35     Results  of   field  investigations  - bulbs and
       vertical curtain                                              181

36     Results  of field  investigations  - basin                       196
                                XV

-------
                        LIST  OF  SYMBOLS
Symbol                   Definition                         Unit


  C           Estimation of free formaldehyde                 %
              concentration in sample

  C,-.—        Determined concentration of  free               %
   FE
              formaldehyde  in extract
                                                           2
  D           diffusion coefficient                        m  •  3
                                                                -1
  D           shear  speed                                    s
   r                  v
                                                                2
  F           surface of  sample cross-section                m

  H.          head of grouting pressure measured             m
              as grout column  above ground surface

  H           head of water or  dilating liquid pressure       m
              measured as liquid  column  above ground
              surface

  I~L          height  of petrified  block                      cm

  h  r        distribution of  piezometric pressures          m

  H           difference  between  grout level in the           m
              feeding tank and  groundwater  level
              or in case of unwatered  medium -
              level bottom filter  injection well.
m
  H.          grouting pressure measured  as the
              difference  of piezometric  level
              in the  feeding  tank and  ground -
              water  level  /expressed  as the
              height  of water column/

  H           water  or dilating  liquid  pressure               m
              measured  as the difference
              of piezometric level  in the feeding
              tank and groundwater level /expressed
              as the  height of water column/
                              XVI

-------
Symbol
             Definition
                                                             Unit
  K,







  k



  k
   w
  L
    n
m



m
  I


N




Nl




n



n





n





Q



Q



Q
hydraulic  gradient



coefficient  characterizing number

of methylol  groups  in  hardened

resins  MF



coefficient  characterizing number

of methylene  bonds in 'hardened ^esin

MF



grout  permeability  coefficient



water, permeability  coefficient



lenght  of  injection  well filter



filter  elevation below ground surface



thickness  of aquifer



sample  mass



number  of time  steps



number  of time  step in which

displacement starts



effective porosity of soil



number  of  gram - molecule

of substances



temperature  coefficient of resin

gelling  time



injection rate



mean  injection  rate
                                                          m/s,  cm/s



                                                          m/s,  cm/s
                                                               m, cm
                                                               m, cm



                                                                 G
    o
               initial  injection  rate
                                                                 3/
                                                               m /s


                                                                 3/
                                                               m /s
                                                  3,
                                                m /s
                               XVII

-------
Symbol
Qw
q
q
R
r
r
o
rB
/
rc
T
t
t
c
t
g
t.
i
t'.
t
w
A t
V
VB
Definition
water pumping rate
injection rate per filter length
unit
mean injection rate per filter
length unit
radius of permeable area
radius
radius of injection well filter
measured range of petrified block
computed range of petrified block
measured range of the ring
interior
soil temperature
time
time of dilation
time of gelation
measured injection time
computed injection time
time of water pumping
time step
grout volume
measured volume of petrified block
Unit
3/
m /s
2/
cm /s
cm /s
m, cm
m
cm
m, cm
m, cm
m, cm
°K
s
h;
h/
h/
h,'
h/
s
3
cm
3
cm
XVIII

-------
Symbol                    Definition                         Unit


                                                                 3
                                                                i

                                                                 3
V .p.           computed volume of petrified block            cm
  B
 V            measured  volume of the  ring                 cm
   c           ...
               interior


                                                                3
 V            computed  volume of the ring                  cm

               interior

                                                                3
 V            water  volume                                 cm
   w

                                                                3
 V            increase of grout volume                     cm

                                                                 2
 v            volume  of pumped grout  per unit               m

               of  filter length

                                                                 2
 v            volume  of pumped water per unit               m

   W           of  filter length


 v            velocity of flow  in boundary                  m/s

               of zones covered  by  grout and

               water

                                                                2
 v            increase of  pumped  grout per                 m

               filter  length unit


 W            water  content in  sample of stabilized            %

               soil

                                                                /~i
  f            density  of grout
                                                              cm


  XX            viscosity  of  grout                            cP


               viscosity  of grout at the grouting              cP

               start moment



    ,1 \         viscosity  of grout of the grouting

  '^  ''         finish moment                                cp



  ,.            viscosity  of water                             cP
                              XIX

-------
Symbol                     Definition                        Unit
                 ,       ,                                     ..
                shear  stress                                ~~~2
                                                             m

  ToC            carbon  content in hardened resin MF            %

  % Cp          carbon  content  in methylol  and               %
                methylene  groups  of  hardened
                resin MF

  
-------
                     A CKNOWLEDG EMENTS

In connection with the completion  of project  PR-5-532-6 entitled  "Techni-
ques  for Constructing Underground Barriers by Injection  of Plastics"
I  express  my deep appreciation to my  collaborators  of the  research and
the  co-authors of  the final  report  : M.Sc. engineers:  Andrzej  Balcerzak,
Witold Gizynski,  Marek Gnatowski, Andrzej Pietak,  Andrzej  Wita. In addi-
tion  I express  my deep gratitude  to  dr William  C.Galegar,  Director
RSKERL,   the project officer  of this project  for the assistance  and  kind
cooperation in the realization of the project,  to Mr. Leslie G . Me  Million
for the initiation of this project,  and to Mr. Thomas  Le Pine for his aid in the
work  organization and for the  pleasant  atmosphere to  which he  contributed
a great deal, while the Polish  and American  parties were  cooperating.
                                 XXI

-------
                             SECTION  I

                           INTRODUCTION


Protection of underground waters  is one of the most important  elements  of
environmental protection. Since the movement of  underground  waters  is  ex-
tremely slow, pollution may be revealed  only many years later .  As opposed
to surface waters, the cleaning  of underground waters is difficult,  and  in
many cases  impossible.  Frequently, the  pollution of  underground  water
resources becomes an  irreversible process .  The quality of underground  wa-
ters also determines  the  quality of surface waters, as many of the water co-
urses are supplied mainly  by underground waters .

Industry and agriculture contribute  noxious compounds into the  subsoil,  ad-
jacent to  underground  waters .  When the quantity  of these compounds  is li-
mited, the deterioration  of water  quality  may be contained  within admissible
limits.  Unfortunately, the  waste disposal practices are  creating more   and
more cases of pollution of  underground waters to the extent that  they become
useless for  satisfying  many  needs. Pollution of underground waters  may
occur in large areas, as in cases of excessive  application  of  fertilizers and
chemicals for pliant protection;  or  it may be localized,  for example,  in the
areas  of industrial  and communal  waste disposal^ pipe leakage. In certain
•instances  when penetration of the pollutants  into the soil cannot be prevented,
one should attempt limiting the polluted  area  and protecting the unpolluted
ones. This can be done by  closing the water-bearing strata with vertical and
horizontal impermeable curtains .  The contaminated  area can be surrounded
by a leak-proof barrier,  thus interrupting  the hydraulic contact with   the
adjacent areas. In some cases, unclosed barriers can be constructed, which
separates  the streams of  underground waters .

Depending  upon the soil type  and aquifer  depth, various  methods for  cons-
truction of the barriers  are possible . One of them consists  of  establishing
walls by means of grouting. When the aquifer  is very deep, a leak-proof wer-
tical or horizontal barrier  may only be built by grouting .

The purpose of this study was to develop  technology to  construct subsurface
barriers using modified urea-formaldehyde  and acetone-formaldehyde  resins
in acid, neutral and  alkaline  soils . The resins were selected because of
their expected low production cost and  availability in Poland .

-------
                            SECTION  II

                             SUMMARY


Optimum conditions were attempted for  the synthesis of urea-formaldehyde
resins for the purpose of soil stabilization. Methods for  modification of
resins by pyros,ulphate  of sodium as well as  ways of hardening them by me-
ans  of salt  and acid solutions  have been evaluated. Investigations  were
carried out  on laboratory, semi-technical  and technical  scale,  for  the
production of the  various types of grouts . The properties  of the resins as
strength and permeability of the soils stabilized  by resins have  been  stu-
died . Investigation  of plasticizers, ethylene, diethylene, furfural  alcohol,
acrylic amide,  and E-caprolactan, used with the modified resins  have
been conducted.

Urea-formaldehyde resin is  usable only for acid and neutral  soils .  Acetone-
formaldehyde resins were used for the stabilization of alkaline  soils . The
optimum conditions for the  synthesis of acetone-formaldehyde resins were
found and their properties have been  determined . Catalysts for the regula-
tion of the hardening time have been selected .

Laboratory  investigations consisted of  obtaining different shapes  of the
stabilized soil blocks by means of grouting from one grouting  well. Investi-
gations were accomplished  on soil models in a modeling  station prepared
specifically for  this purpose.  The three basic types of stabilized blocks
investigated were :  (l) bulb/pile;  (2) ring; and   (3)  horizontal plate.

Laboratory  experiments  were conducted in unwatered and watered soils
under  conditions  of unconfined  and confined flows . A total of 29 successful
experiments  were carried out. During  the experiments,  the quantity of the
pumped grout as  well as pressure and pumping time were measured .Grou-
ting time  and  dimensions  of the stabilized  blocks were compared  with
the respective magnitudes computed  theoretically.'

Field investigations were conducted  on a field site in the vicinity  of  a
river  reservoir. There  were 34  experiments consisting  of  16 in  unsatu-
rated  soil and 18 in the  saturated soil.  Eleven   11  piles  were  formed
in the  vertical curtain., 18 bulbs have been joined together making  one
monolithic  wall.  The height of the piles-bulbs varied from  1 to 4 meters

-------
and the diameter from 0.8  to  1.6 meters . Quantities of grout, injection
pressures and pumping times were measured. Test  results were compared
with computed  results.

Research on the process of aging the soil stabilized with resins has  been
attempted . The  changes of  strength and permeability with  time of the stabi-
lized  soils samples stored  in water and the air  have been  determined . The
investigation of the process of aging  was limited to one year only.  For  the
purpose of long-term prognosis,  and attempt has been undertaken-to explain
the mechanism of aging and to determine the  factors affecting this  process .
Tests have been made on the stabilized  soil  samples in the  laboratory as
well as on the  samples  taken from the objects constructed in the field.

A mathematical model has been described for the penetration  process  of
the grout, considered as Newtonian  fluid with  a  viscosity  changeable in
time. The analytical solutions have been  designed for the model and  prog-
rams  have  been  constructed  for the digital  computer .  The three basic
patterns  of the  grouting investigated  are:  (l) viscosity of the  grout diffe-
rent from  water viscosity  but  constant up to the  moment of  gelation;
 (2j viscosity of the grout changeable in time  but constant in space; and  (3)
viscosity of the  grout changeable in time and in space.  The presented so-
lutions  are adjusted for utilization  by determining the method of the grou-
ting .

-------
                            SECTION  III

                           CONCLUSIONS


1 .  Modified urea-formaldehyde and acetone-formaldehyde resins  can be used
   as grouts to seal and stabilize  soils. They are  characterized by having
   total solubility in water in the concentration ranges investigated, forming
   a pre-jelling solution of low viscosity. Polymerization occurring  within
   the resin-water-soil mixtures produced  a strengthened  impermeable
   barrier  having a  durability exceeding  twelve (l2j months.

2.  Plasticizers of ethylene, acethylene glycols, furfural  alcohols and acry-
   lic amide did not  improve grouting properties of the resins  tested .

3.  Gelation  time could be regulated between a few  minutes  and  tens of hours
   with modification developed  in this  investigation.

4.  Soils stabilized by urea-formaldehyde  resins were  found to be resistant
   to deterioration  over the period studied . When  weakening of the structure
   occured,  it was  caused primarily by hydrolysis  of the  polymer. Hydro-
   lysis of the polymer  was dependent upon the pH of the medium and diffu-
   sion  of  reaction  products  away from  the polymer site  .

5.  Strengths  of the stabilized soils to  shearing  ranged from very small  to
   150 kilograms per square centimeter  depending on composition of the
   grout.

6.  Variables affecting the grouting process were determine to be permeabi-
   lity and  porosity  of the soil; viscosity of the resin  solution;  control of the
   jelling  solution; temperature of resin solution, air and soil; pH  of the
   resins  medium and soil saturation.

7.  Geometric shapes in the form of bulbs, piles,  rings and  horizontal plates
   can be constructed in a  predetermined manner and by minimal  earth
   displacement to provide subsurface  barriers to fluid flow.

8.  Mathematical  models can and have been presented for the grouting process
   to determine pressure and pumping times' for the grout to achieve prede-
   termined geometric structures by the resins  studied .

-------
                             SECTION  IV

                          RECOMMEND A TIONS
1 .  Additional research is  required to perfect  the  technique of implanting
   the  subsurface structure to  provide  strengthened impermeable barriers
   to fluid flows .

2.  Further  development  of grouts  with  low  viscosity  and  controlled  har-
   dening  time is  needed .

3 .  The consideration  should  be given to exothermic effects  arising in large
   grout  loads. In order  to minimize  this  effect  a most  appropriate in-
   jection  technology should be developed,  using  grouts of selected  com-
   ponents .

4.  Long  term research on grout  aging  under  field conditions is required.

5 .  It is recommended to investigate  the  changes  in  ground   water quality
   resulting from the use  of grouts .

6.  Economic analysis  should  be developed to  enable  comparison of the
   application  of this  technique with other  presently utilized  technology.

7 .  Subsequent  to  satisfactory development  of the  grouting process  for
   various  subsurface soil  conditions, it  should be  tested  on a suitable
   number of existing situations requiring control by use of this of barrier
   system .

-------
                            SECTION V

                    REVIEW  OF  LITERATURE


APPLICATION  OF CHEMICAL GROUTS

Sealing and strengthening of soils by means of  chemical grouts plays  an
important role in civil  engineering, mining  work and in protection of  the
natural environment.  In Poland attempts have been made to apply  this
method to sealing  of storage yards of refinery  wastes  , pipelines, canals
and  reservoirs '  ' .

Cementation  is the oldest grouting method. However,  cement  leaves solids
suspended  in water  which have a limited penetration capability in porous
media. Flow of the cement grout may only take place if the capillary dia-
meter  is  4-5 times bigger than that of the cement  solids. Application of
Portland cement is  limited to  soils with  a coefficient of permeability  of
80-200 m per 24 hours5 • 6.

With  soils  of lower permeabilities  it is necessary to apply  solutions of
emulsions  of binding compounds .  The following compounds are currently
the most frequently used:

-  sodium silicate   (liquid  glass)
-  acryloamide  and  its derivatives,
-  amino-and amido-formaldehyde resins,
-  phenol-formaldehyde resins,
-  lignosulphonates,
-  furfuran polymers,
-  acetone-formaldehyde  resins .

                                                         289
The range  of application of some grouts is given in Fig. 1   '  '  . The speci-
fied chemical grouts are, however,  relatively  expensive. Prices of some
of the  applied  grouts are presented in Table  1  '  .

-------
GRAVEL



1


FINE




SAND
1
COARSE
| |


MEDIUM




FINE




CLAY SOIL
COARSE
SILT





SILT
(NON - PLASTIC)


ACRYL POLYMERS
(AM -9. PWG)






















LIGNOCHROMICS


11








.
n
L

1





UREA -FOE MA!
(HERCI



! !






Ml


PHENC


L
L
J
)]

L
E
L
L
L

1.
>E1
,01
Lt


TYE
<)



E
~~



RESINS
|







I





-FORMALDEHYDE RESINS







SILICATE
(iNJECTROL G)





CEMENT


















X














10 0
1 .0
0.1
0.01
                                                                            0.001
Fig.l  Soil limits for grout  injectivity
                                          ;rain size  in mm

-------
TABLE  1.  RELATIVE  COSTS OF  CHEMICAL GROUTS
1 	 	
No
1 .
2.
3.
4 .
5.
6.
7 .
8.

Chemical grout .
Cement grout (d = 1 .5 unit/m )
Liquid glass with calcium
chloride according to Joosten
Acryl polymers (AM-9J
Resorcin - formaldehyde
resins
Lignosulphonates with sodium
dichromate
UF resins
Bituminous emulsions
Epoxy and polyester resins
— _— _ __. _ __ 	
Cost
in capitalist
countries
1 .0
2.5
2.4 - 9.5
,2.4 - 9.5
1 .5
3 4
1.5-6
36 - 120
	
index
in Poland
1 .0
_
-
1.5-4
6 - 8
6
80
Relatively high prices of organic grouts limit their application. It should  be
expected, however,  that large volume manufacturing  will decrease costs of
organic grouts. With this in mind,  investigations were initiated  relating to
soil stabilization by means of organic grouts . With attention given to a cheap
raw material  available in Poland, the range of application  and properties.,
the following promising  grouts were selected for
                                                  investigation:
    urea-formaldehyde  resins,
    acetone -formaldehyde resins .

UREA-FORMALDEHYDE  RESINS
                                   (UF)
 The first attempts to  stabilize soils by means of UF resins were made in the
 United States in the  1940s.    Since  then they have found entensive  applica-
 tion in grouting technologies . These compounds are particularly  valuable for
 grouting  stabilization due to such properties as :
    low viscosity,
    solubility in water,
    wide  range  of regulation  of the time of transition from solution into gel,
    high rate of sealing and strengthening of stabilized soils,
    resistance  to ageing processes  and powerful media.

-------
TABLE 2.  PROPERTIES OF SOME  UF RESINS APPLIED TO GROUTING
No
1 .
2.
3.
4.
5 .
6.
7 .
8.
9 .
10.
_ 	 _
Name of resin
Krepitel M4' 5 ' 6' ? ' 11
MF - 1711'15"
M - 6012
MFS - 713
14
MFF
R 1 R
MM - 2 '
r* 1C
Karbaniid '
lie17
Dukol7'18
3,9,19,20,21
Herculox

Country
USSR
USSR
USSR
USSR
USSR
USSR
Poland
Poland
Czech .
USA

Recommended
concentration
of 1 % 1 resin
20 - 50
30
30 - 60
60 - 70
N.A .
N.A .
30
30 - 60
30
50

_
Viscosity
(cP)
6 - 60
N.A .
N.A .
N.A .
N.A .
N.A .
6
6 - 200
10 - 15
13

	 	 —
Hardener
U - -
HC1
HC1
acids
acids
acids
acids
HC1
acids
HC1
Ammonium
salts
Compressive
strength of soil
(N/nr2) -'lO6
L - - —1
1 - 5
6
1 - 30
N.A .
N.A .
N.A .
15
10
5
13


-------
Properties  of some of the UF resins applied to grouting are given in Table 2 .

Soils  stabilized by UF resins reach a high rate of sealing. These resins were
applied to the surface of reservoirs5'22 and in some  mining work to combat
the water hazard in mines.13'14'15'16  The coefficients  of permeability
from  10"9 to 10"6 m/s4'?2  of the sealed soils  depended among other factors,
on the kinds of applied resin, and the concentration and the amount. The prac-
tical  water permeability of soil,  treated  with resin, diminished in the  field
from  a few dozen to  a few hundred times .4j   A high  rate of sealing makes
it possible to use the UF resins for construction of impermeable  curtains
preventing pollution  of underground waters .

Soils  stabilized by UF resins are considerably  stronger than unstabilized soils.
Their property may be used in those cases where it is necessary not  only  to
seal but also to strengthen ;  e.g. while  constructing impermeable walls  under
the foundations of structures . The strengthening  effects are subject  to  a
number of factors which include the following;  the kind and concentration of
resin, grain size  composition, petrographic composition and soil density. 3
Influence of the wetting power  of minerals by resin on the obtained strengthe-
ning effects was noted.

Resistance of soils  stabilized  by UF resins to  aging processes is an important
factor determining the range of work which can be carried out by means of this
method .  The  available  literature contains general remarks about a long-term
                                                         1 7 1 °i
durability of soils strengthened and sealed  by UF resins.   '    Rzhanitsin,
         z4                 25
Bleskina    and  Tshaykova     have found that  UF resins are resistant   to
underground water  pollution., particularly acid and alkalic  media  ranging
between  pH 3-13. The  mechanism of aging and factors causing aging of soils
stabilized by UF  resins have not, however, been explored thoroughly.  The
range of their  application has as a rule been limited to neutral  and  acid
soils  . This range may  be extended by a primary washing of soils by acids .
Generally it is assumed that grouting is  economically justified  in soils
containing less than 3 to 5  percent of  carbonates and 10 to 15  percent  of
clay.i?,19,26

ACETONE-FORMALDEHYDE  RESINS

AF resins are primarily for surface  stabilization of soils,  e.g.  in  road
construction or soils preparation for ore extraction27 ' 28 . Grouting stabili-
zation of  soils was  accomplished  by means  of acetone and  formaldehyde
solutions  hardened  by alkaline  catalyzers.29  Notes  concerning properties
of  stabilized soils, by AF  resins, including strength  and  permeability are
rather vague . It  has been  stated that the soil  strength of 9 . 2 -106 N/m2 ' 2?
was  obtained in the  case  of a  surface  stabilization and that samples obtained
from  grouting  by  acetone and formaldehyde are waterproof.29
                                  10

-------
The literature lacks information concerning the range of application of AF
resins to soil stabilization. Since they are hardened in alkaline media, these
resins should supplement  UF resins  in this respect. Limited information
concerning AF grouts  stimulated the  present  investigation.
                                 11

-------
                            SECTION VI

       SYNTHESIS OF  LOW  - VISCOSITY  UREA  FORMALDEHYDE
       RESINS AND THEIR  MODIFICATION BY SODIUM PYROSULPHITE

       AND PROPERTIES OF STABILIZED  SOILS


Urea-formaldehyde resins  (UF  resins)  have been used for grouting  soil
stabilization  of thirty years .  In many cases, better  sealing was  achieved
by use of modified resins for this  purpose.  Among many possible modifica-
tions, condensations of  resins  with  sodium  pyrosulphite   (SPJ    deserves
notice .  On the basis of the literature  inquiry we can not find  that they have
been used as  chemical grouts .

An  introduction of sulfonate  groups  into the structure of cross-linked resins
should reduce the effect of the  syneresis occuring  during hardening  and
should consequently improve  sealing capacity  of the chemical  grouts . It  is
especially  important in the case  when the resin is used for the  production
of impermeable curtains in the soil. On the other hand,  hydrophilic  proper-
ties  of resin  molecules should also advantageously  influence  the  process
of polycondensation  connected  with  formation of cross-linked polymer, espe-
cially in dilute solutions.

Synthesis of the resins modified by SP  does not differ  much from the gene-
rally known methods  of  obtaining UF resins .  In the investigations reported
in the present  paper,  a two stage method of resin   3  ^j^o  Syn-tiiesis  was
accepted as the production  method.

Molar ratio of formaldehyde (F)  and urea (u)  reagents =  2.2:1  was  accepted
as an optimum one because  the resins of this  approximate  molar ratio assu-
res  high endurance properties and  impermeability  to the stabilized  soils
as confirmed in  later works .  However  , industrially  obtained  UF  resins of
such molar ratio  possess comparatively high viscosity  (about 50cP at 293°]
and can precipitate  collodial deposit    which  makes grouting in silty  soils
difficult.

To investigate the  synthesis  of low-viscosity UF resins  ^viscosity  below
25cP at 293°K with 45 percent of fixed substances) ,  which would make

                                   12

-------
an ideal solution, the structure  of the precipitating  deposit was investigated.
Collodial deposits were isolated from the resins obtained in the laboratory
by the two stage method having  a molar  ratio F:U =2.1:1. It was  washed
with  a 3 percent solution  (concentration approximate  to the content of F in
the resin) and next washed with distilled water, and vacuum dried  at  a
temperature  308° +  2°K.   Its infra red  spectrum (iR spectrum) of the subs-
tance was  obtained  and  compared with the  IR spectrum of the washed sample
of the cross-linked  UF resin of the molar ratio F : U = 2 .1 : 1 . The  collodial
deposit  had a structure similar to the  cross-linked resins  (See Figure  2) .
The UF resins formation at the chemical equilibrum  state is  highly depen-
dent  on  the  coii-litions  of the synthesis .  In the initial period of the reaction,
F  unites with  U in an environment  approximate to the neutral one (pH  7.5-
6.5)  .  Velocity  of an undesirable  reaction of condensation  can also  occur
depending  on the pHj temperature  ,  environment,  and degree  of U  substitu-
tion  '.  Reduction of the value  of pH accelerates  the reaction  between
                                    oh oo
methylol and amide or amino groups   '  .  This change can occur  in  the
reaction mixture due to Cannizzaro's  reaction.  An increase  of temperature
causes  the shift of the reaction equilibrium  towards  the  formation of  inter-
molecular  bonds accompanied  by  decreased  number of methylol  groups   3°°t

Velocity of the intermolecular bonds formation is also  reduced when the substi-
tution of  U molecules  in F solution  increases  .  So  formation of these bonds
occur at the largest velocity in  the  first period of reaction.

A  series of resin syntheses was performed during which the process of addition
F : U (the first period of synthesis)  was done within 45 minutes at the tempe-
ratures  293° - 2°K  and 353° * 2°K and then  completed at boiling conditions
 (367 K) within 30 minutes . The initial value  of pH reaction  mixture, after
being treated  by 3 percent sodium  hydroxide, was 7.5. A majority of the  mo-
nomers were  found to react  at  the  temperature of 318°K within 45  minutes.
This  was evidenced by the  strongly   exothermic effect of the reaction  which
lessened after 30 minutes  . When the process of condensation was  accomplished
in the boiling  conditions at pH  4.6 - 0.2, the resins of designed viscosity were
neutralized  and cooled. The properties  of the obtained  resins are oiven in the
table 3 .
                                13

-------
     1800
1400
1000
                                       warelength
Fig . 2 IR spectrum of colliodal deposit isolated from UF
     resin (l) and hardened UF resin (2j
      1800          1400         "1000"
                                        warelength
Fig .  3  IR spectrum of hardened UF resin (l) and UF
      resin  modified by SP
                        14

-------
 TABLE 3.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE  TEMPERATURE AT WHICH - THE
             FIRST  PERIOD OF ADDITION  REACTION OF F  TO  U IS
             CARRIED OUT ON THE  STABILITY  OF THE OBTAINED
             RESINS
1 	 -

Tempe-
rature
I K'

	
293 - 2
318 - 2

318 - 2

353 - 3

318 - 2



Molar
ratio
F:U:SP

	 ... 	 	
2.1:1:0
2 .1:1:0

2.1:1:0

2.1:1:0

2.1:1:
0,049

Time of
addition
reaction
at decre-
ased
temp .
(min .)

_____ 	
45
45

90

45

45



Resin
visco-
sity
at 293°K
(cP)

	
23- 1
34- 1

23-1

22* 1

25 - 1
t 	 _ — - -


Resin
density
at 293°K
(g/cm3)

. 	 .
1 .175
1.175

1.175

1.175

1 .195



X
Dry
residue
(*)


44
44

45

44

46



XX
Resin
stabi-
lity
-~ to —

till 1
hour
about 3
days
about 3
days
till 1
hour
about 3
days
   See  method for explanation
xx Time when first sediment noted

It is clear from the achieved  results,  (the resins of the largest stability without
turbidity and deposit )  are the ones  obtained in the synthesis  which F and  U
                  o                                                     o
were added at 318 K. Decrease  of the temperature of this reaction to 293 K
was deemed flot to be advisable as it crystalized the  methylol ureas .  On the
other hand, an increase of temperature up to 353 K  worsens  stability depen-
ding on the quantity  of formed  methylene ureas .  It was concluded  that  the
changes of temperature  accordingly  influenced  the pH of the  reaction mixture
 (attU8°KpH  diminished  from  7.5  to 7.0-7.2  and at 353°K pH diminishes
from  7.5 to 6. 5-6.3 J.   The period of the  reaction, when prolonged at the low
temperature  (318 K), does not improve  resin stability (Table 3) .

Due to observed  tendency of the resins obtained at molar ratio F:U = 2.1:1  to
cloud and precipitate deposit, the influence  of the molar ratio  F:U= 2.5:1
on the resins stability was investigated . A series of syntheses  was also made
for the following  molar  ratios:  F:U = 2.1:1,  2.2:1, 2.3:1, 2.4:1,   2.5:1.
                                    15

-------
The resins were synthesized by the two stage method with a low temperature
period of  F and U addition being preserved. During  condensation in boiling-
conditions  at pH 4.7-0.2,  the samples of the following viscosity  were  Q  N
taken  from the reactor:   8 - 9.5cP s  10 - IcP,   15  - IcP,  19 - 2cP (at 293 K;
They  were neutralized  by 3 percent NaOH  to  pH  7.0:7.5 and were  under
observation for  90 days  (Table 4) . The test did not cover the molar ratios
of reactants above 2.5:1 as the molar ratio of F:ll=2.1:l  was later
indicated to be  optimum  from the point of view of the  strength of the  soil
samples.  Through  condensation of resins  containing more F, it is  possible
to obtain an optimum ratio of the  reactants by dissolving an adequate quan-
tity of U in the  resins  or  in the hardener . Samples of the stabilized  soil  are
found to be less strong, the more U is   dissolved in the resins . The  molar
ratio  of F:U  can affect the resins  stability because chemical equilibrium
is shifted   toward formation  of methylol ureas .  At  the same time methylene
ether  bonds are formed  instead of the  competitive  methylene ones  . The
stable resins of lower viscosity were found to be obtained when the molar
ratio   F:U increased.  For example :  At the molar ratio F:U 2.5:1 the stable
resin of 9cP viscosity  (at 293  K)   was  obtained,  while  viscosity  of  the
reaction  mixture before condensation  was equal to 7cP (at 239 Kj .

When  stable low-viscosity UF resins  were obtained,, the synthesis  of UF
resins  modified by SP was  randomly investigated . After the  introductory
tests  the maximum molar ratio F:U:SP= 2.1:0.049  was accepted  because
the resins containing  more  S? (F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0 .09y    hardened insuffi-
ciently and the samples  of the soil stabilized by these  resins  were  destro-
yed  when stored under water .

Modified resins were obtained in the same way as unmodified ones. Si5 \\\-..;
introducted  to the reaction by being dissolved  in formalin with U (pH 7 .0] .
The solution usually  required acidification  before synthesis .  Results of
the syntheses  are shown  in Table 3 and 4. It was  concluded that  SP modi-
fication did  not influence in  a  perceptible  way the stability of the resins.

These results led to the  determination  of the  optimum conditions  for the
synthesis of stable,, low-viscosity   UF  resins modified  by SP .  From   the
point  of view of stability., the molar ratio  F:U =2.5:1  was accepted as the
most  profitable one . When urea and sodium pyrosulphite were  dissolves
in formalin, the  solution  was neutralized  to pH = 7.5  and then  heated
at. 318 K  for 45  minutes, continued in boiling conditions for an additional
30 minutes and  later acidified  by 3 percent HC1 to pH 4.7:0.2.  The  resins
are  condensed  in this  boiling condition to obtain a viscosity  above  9cP.
They  are  then  neutralized to pH 7 .0  to 8 .0 and  cooled  to room  temperature
                                 16

-------
TABLE  4. STABILITY OF SP  UNMODIFIED AND  MODIFIED UF RESINS
           OF DIFFERENT  MOLAR RATIOS F:U   (resin density =  1,200*
           l,170g/cm  ,  dry residue 40^48%
~
Molar
ratio
F:U
2,1:1
2,2:1
2,3:1
---___«
2,4:1
	
2,5:1
Viscosity
at 293°K
(cP)
8 -0^5
10 ±1
i 	 _ 	 -.
15 ±1
19-2
8 -0,5
10 ±1
15 ±1
19- 2
|__ 	 __._
8 - 0,5
10 + 1
15 ±1
19-2
8 -0,5
10 ±1
15 - 1
19-2
	 a
8 -0,5
10 ±1
15 ti
19-2
Unmodified
resin
!! Molar ratio F : SP |
1:0,00143 j 1:0,0233 j
i
Ageing period in days i
1 f 3
-
-
+
+

-
+
+
-

+
+
-
+
-t-
	
+
+
+
+
+


	 1
+
i_ _
L

1 	
+

H ~
+
I
+
1 	


+
L'_ _
+

4-
	
+
+
7 ! 14 ^28
, . _ L _
1 I
I 1
I }
I '
,- 	 1 	
1 '
i i
_
I '
I 1
1 l
L _1 L
i '
i '
J '
	 J_ r _.
l l
l '
l | t- —
i + ' +
+ i - ' -
1 	 | _ !
1 '
1 '
1 '
-- -[ - -r - 1
l '
i i
i. _j i _
90J! 1
t _, 	
ii
u -
ii
ii -
	 it"
,! H-
" ~ TI " -
-!! +
1!
II -
M
II
II -
II
~ - TI 	
11 +
il
_ -H 	
II
-" ij.+ -
II
II
II
- TI
II
II ~
11
+i i 'II
I i - ' - ' - II +
l ' > '1 +
i + ' +
+ l - ' -
	 , _ _i_ 	 i
l '
I '
i >
s r ">
1 '
1 I
1 *~ "*
, + . +
+ , - 1 -
	 t 	 L. -J
1 1
+ 1 + ' +
_ L ' -
1 '
	 ] 	 L
i '
__+_l_tll..
i '
__t;_t_i.+_.
i r
+ ', + ! +
TI
+ II
- II +
JJ 1
II
II _
II
~ "TI ~-
II +
II "
n — i
- ii +
ii
+ !! +
lit
_ u
n
+ " +
. _ 11 _ _ _
n
+ .! +
H
ii
-c n +
3 i 7
	 i 	 .
i
i
i
i
i
~* i
+ i -
~r \
\
i
i
i
- " r 	
_ i
+ L.+.J
i
i
143 28 i 90l 1 i 3 ! 7
	 ^ L. —1 	 L 	 1 	



+



+
_
i i
1 !
	 L J
t 1 i
i
i
+ ' +
i
i
i
i — i
i
- i
i
+ i +
i
+ ; +
i
i
i
!
+ ! +
+ : +
i
i
+ i +
-
+


+
+

+
4.
+



r —



+



+

—
+
+

+
+
+



-



-


-
+


+
+

+
+
+
i i
- i i
1 	 U J 	

+
+


+
+
-
-

+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
1
1
1
- 1
+ i'
1
1
1
1
1
	 1
_ 1
1
	 , _ —
1
+ > +
_4 —
1
_ ^ 	
1
1
+ ! t
i
— i —
i
+ i +
i
i
i
~i-
i
— i
i
+ J +
i
+ | +
i
i
i
~ - "
+ : +
~~ i~ ~
+ : +
14 '28 . 90 '
	 4. 	 '
i '
i |
	 4 	
1
_I_
L _ _



+


-
+


+
+
	 i
+
+
- - - - r - -
I '
+ i + ' +
1 	 ,


u 	 ,
+

\- 	 1

*- - 1
+

-
-
+

T
+
+
	
!
	 1
I
1
1
1
4
1
- J.
|
1
I
1
j
I
I
i
I
1
1
I
~ I
+ .'
1
1
!
i
1
1
I
+ :
i
i
~ 4. ;
i
+ i
i
+ i
      +  resin without traces of cloudiness
      +  resin with opalescencing clouding
      -  resin with precipitated deposit
                                     17

-------
Due to the investigations  concerning  the soils stabilized  by  UF  resins
modified by SP,  two types  of resins  of the  following molar  ratios
F:U:SP = 2 .5:1:0 .00357  and 2.5:1:0.0583  were  selected for further study
The  investigations  of  synthesis  on the technical  scale and with  use of
industrial  apparatus (within the frame of informative  production) were
carried out for these  resins.   This study  tested resin  ,-ynthesis techno-
logy using  technical  grade materials . It also  secured  a large portion
of material for  aging  investigations  and  investigations  of  grouting
techniques  . The  syntheses on a semi- technical scale and with  use  of
industrial  apparatus,  carried out according  to the previously  mentioned
                                                               reactors
description, showed that the course of reaction  was similar  in
                                  3         *^
of capacities  ranging from  0.2m  to  5m  .  The tests also indicated
that  exothermic  effect of the reaction of F  and U could be controlled when
heating  of the reactor began  at  308 K  and cooling  at  313 K.  The resins
had  small opalescencing  cloudiness,  probably  due  to the technical raw
materials contaminations,  having properties as listed in  Table 5  and 6.
TABLE  5 .  PROPERTIES OF SP MODIFIED RESINE OBTAINED
            IN SEMITECHNICAL SCALE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Properties
Density at 293 K in g/cm
Viscosity at 293°K in cP
pH 293°K
Dry residue , percent
Acetate tolerance
Content of free F, percent
General appearance
'
Molar ratio F : U : SP
2.5: 1 : 0.00358
1 170
10
40
total
3.7
2.5:1: 0.0584
1 193
14
7 .8
43
total
o o
o . u
colorless, limpid liquid
of slight opalescencing cloudiness

-------
TABLE 6.  PROPERTIES  OF SP MODIFIED RESINS  OBTAINED

            IN TECHNICAL SCALE






1

2


3
4

5
6

7


•
	
	 r


Properties


Density at 293°K
, o
in g/cm
Viscosity
at 293°K
in cP
pH at 293°K
Dry residue
in percent
Acetate tolerance
Content of free F
percent
G eneral
requirements
by Contempo-
rary Conditions
	


Molar ratio ]
2,5:1:0,00358
9430 kilo
portion 2

1 .175


16
7 .6

43 .2
total

3.8



fulfill
i


F:U:SP and batch
2.5:1:0,00358
9660 kilo
portion 2

1 .174


•11
7 .6

45 .4
total

3.2



fulfill

- - j
1
quantity
2.5:1:0,058
9660 kilo
portion 2

1 .205


11
7 .0

48 .3
total

2 .8



fulfill
i
THE STRUCTURE AND  PROPERTIES  OF  LOW-VISCOSITY  UF  RESINS
MODIFIED BY SP

Investigations  concerning the structure of the cross-linked UF resins modi-
fied by SP were carried out on the basis of the results obtained from the
elementary  analysis and IR spectrum of the resins with molar ratio F:U:SP =
2.1:1:0.049. After 7 days the sample of the resin  hardened by hydrochloric
acid solution at pH 2 was  pulverized and extracted by distilled water . The
                                 IS

-------
elementary analysis was done for an unextracted  sample and the  samples
analyzed after 1 montlh and  3 months of extraction (Table 1) .

TABLE  7.  RESULTS OF THE ELEMENTARY ANALYSIS OF THE
            HARDENED UF RESIN SAMPLES MODIFIED BY SP OF THE
            MOLAR RATIO F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0 . 049  the resin was hardened
            in the solution by 30 percent hydrochloric acicl at pH  2
Period
of sample
extraction by
distilled water
unextracted
resin
1 month
3 months
Content
% N

25 04
31 .81
31 .95
of elements
% C
_ _ 	 	 i

30.74
32.25
32 .41
percent
°/oS

3.07
0.85
1 .03
i _ _
Ratio of
sulphur /nitrog en
weight content
°/oS / foN

0.122
0.027
0.032
	 	 	 	
 IR spectrum was made for the sample after 3 months of extraction (Figure  3
 The results presented in Table 7  show that the unextracted sample contains
 3.07 percent of sulphur which is approximately the estimated  theoretical
 quantity of 2.8 percent.  Only 25 percent of the sulphur introduced  to  the
 reaction is  constantly bounded to the polymer.  Occuren.ce of  sulfonate
 groups  in modified resins is confirmed by comparison  of IR spectograms
 of the  extracted  samples of modified  and unmodified resins (Figure 3j  .New
 bands appear for the wave lengths  1105 cm *• and 805 cm   when the resins
 are modified. The band on the range of  1105 cm"  probably comes  from
 resonance vibrations of the SO? group
 Wetting power of minerals is the  essential property of the  resins used as
 chemical grouts .  It expecially applies to wetting of quartz which is the
 main component of the stabilized  soil.  Some authors  maintain the  resin
                                                                        O O
 wetting  power  of minerals  is connected with  the resin  adhesion to them".
 Investigations  of the angle of  boundary for the phases UF resins-quartz-aiv
 were carried out for  40 percent solution of unmodified resins  and modified
 ones of  molar ratio  F:U:SP= 2.1:1:0.003  and  2 . 1: 1:0 . 00049 . Measurements
 were taken at  temperatures  293± 2°K  and the results are given in Table  8.
                                   20

-------
TABLE 8.  THE VALUES OF  THE ANGLE OF BOUNDARY FOR THE
            PHASES RESIN UF - QUARTZ - AIR  (resin concentration
            40 percent, viscosity  14cP, temperature 293  K)
                Type of UF resin
                                                  Average value of the
                                                       '•to
angle  of boundary
                                                   Ra
  unmodified  resin (F:U=2.1:  1

  modified  resin  fr : U :  SP = 2 .1:1:0 .003)
  modified  resin (F : U : SP = 2 .1: 1:0.049
       0.330
       0.376
       0.334
Values of the angles of boundary ranging  from 0.330 Ra to 0.376 Ra, were
approximate for all  investigated resins and it is clear from these experi-
ments that modification  of UF resins by SP do not influence  their  wetting
power . So it may be assumed that  adhesiveness  of  modified  resins  to
quartz, being  the component  of the stabilized  soil, is not higher either .

The mathematical  description  of filtration of chemical  p'routs requires
knowledge of  the rheology properties of resin solutions  of various viscosi-
ties . Measurements of this  kind were  carried out on the rotative vicometer
for  shearing  stresses t  =  7 to 70 N/m"  and  shear velocity Dr =5-1000    ;
at temperature  293.0  -  0.1°K.  Investigations were conducted  on  resin
samples  of the  molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049  and  concentration of  40
percent.  Different condensation  rates, having viscosities ran
-------
CM

 I
 6




 .5, 60




 w


 CD
 r



 ™  <0
 cd

 0)
    201
                Q.
                              ^~

                                      n
                                             ^p
               200
                  400
oOO      800       1000



 shear velocity  (.S
Or
Fig. 4  Function  diagrams


        modified  by SP
                                       = f (Dr)  for UF resin
                             22

-------
                                 H"
                                                                 + HO
 .  .C-NH-CHOH + H N-C^v-^-^C-NH-CH  -CH-C^
    ii          2       2    11              ii                  A
    O                     00                  O
This condensation  is catalyzed by hydronium ions, the concentration of which
limits the process  velocity. In the acid  environment at pH 4 the  velocity of
formation of methylene bonds  exceeds  the  velocity of addition of M and U
leading to the formation of methylol groups    :
        C- NH,
        ii
        O
                                    C - NH-CH  OH
                                               LJ
In the reaction  environment, methylol groups assure solubility to the  macro
molecules in the first period of  hardening.  The resins hardening  process
occurs  clue  to condensation, and  depends  on the methylol groups not being
excessively  decreased . Otherwise, low molecular hydrophobia  fractions
deposit  from the solution  and  they lower the strength properties  of the
hardened  resins . Hence, the structure  of the polymer is  determined by the
initial ratio  of methylol, amide, amiiio groups and concentration  of free  F
occuring  in the reaction  mixture .

The accepted  technology  of increasing  the  solubility  of U in resins  obtained
at the molar ration F:U=2.1:1  is not profitable  from the point  of  view of
its hardening  mechanism.  An  increase  in the quantity of dissolved U  should
effect the polymer occuring after hardening to have more hydrophobia  pro-
perties .  Investigations were made  of the variance  of four molar ratio  of
F:U  on the  soil stability.  "Resin  syntheses  were made according  to the pre-
viously  presented  description  and  their properties  are given in Table 9.

TABLE  9.  THE PROPERTIES OF UF RESINS OBTAINED AT THE MOLAR
            RATIO F:U  =2.1  to  4:1

Molar
ra tio
F : U

2.1:1
2.5:1
3 : 1
4 : 1


Viscosity
at
293°K
(cP)
27 .2
13.8
9.8
4.7

i 	
Density
at
293°K
(g/cm3)
1 .172
1.146
1.136
1.120 ;
1

Dry
residue
«
i ]
45 .6
35.0
31 .0
25 .0



pH

6.8
G.8
6 .8
7 .0
•
                                   23

-------
The samples of the stabilised soil  were made by saturation  of sand with
solutions  of the following composition :

    resin  (F:U  =  2.1:1  after U being dissolved)     100 parts by volume
    water                                            45 parts by volume

    10 percent oxalic acid  (to pH 2)                   5 parts by volume

Solutions of U and F were  also used for stabilization.
The samples were tested for resistance after  7  days storage.
Results are given  in  Figure  5.  It was concluded that an increase of the
quantity  of U dissolved in the resin is  followed  by a decrease of the strength
of U  stabilized  soil. Accepting  compressive  strength of the sample  of the
stabilized  soil as an evaluating  criterion, two UF  resins modified by maxi-
mum  and  minimum   quantities  of SP   (F:U:SP = 2 .5:1:0 . 003 and   2.5:1:
:0.049)  were made .

The  following molar ratios  U was dissolved in the  earlier  resins  : F:U =
2.3:1,  2.1:1,  1.9:1,  1.7:1,  1.5:1.  The solutions  prepared in this way
were  diluted to contain  30 percent  fixed  constituents  and hardened by oxalic
acid solutions .  Figure  6 illustrates compressive  strength  of the samples
of the  soil  stabilized  by those solutions  after 7 days  storage  under water .
It is evident that  the previously  accepted molar ratio F : U = 2.1 : 1  is  an
optimum one which  is likely  to be independent  of the  quantity of   SP  within
the investigated  range  of molar ratio  F : SP .

A portion of this-study of hardening  UF resins consisted  in the control  of
their  gelling time. The possibly  wide  range of gelling time  control - from
a few  minutes to  some scores of hours   is advisable  in the case of grouting
resins .  Short transition times of solutions  into gel prevents washing out
of the chemical grout sealing the soil during the quick flow of under-ground
waters .  Long transition times  enable  stabilization  of silty soils   of  small
coefficient  of permeability.  It is  indispensible to know the  resin   gelling
times and  characteristics of  viscosity changes occuring  during hardening
to select  grouting parameters

Gelling velocity depends  on the hardening catalyzers. The  review of har-
deners  used for amino-plastics  is given by Wirpsza . 3C? 3!^ ,  36 . jn ^s  s^udy
the two groups  of hardeners  used are acids and ammonium  salts  . In  the
resin  hardened by acids  (hydrochloric, sulphuric, phosporous,  oxalic)
a  constant  hydronium ion concentration is sought.  For the present report
the investigations of velocity of acid  hardening were carried out for  UF
resins  modified  by SP  at the molar ratios   F : U : SP  = 2.5:1:0.00357
and  2.5:1:0.0583. The properties of these resins are given in Table 1C.
                                    24

-------
5-lQ5_
'on
c
CD
cu
w
tn
fi
o
U
            2.0 :1
           2.5 '
                                                           M
-------
  6'10'
CM
 I
 QJ
 f-,
 -t— >
 CO

 (U
 en
 en
 0)
 O
 U

              X5'1
19'i
2J! 1      .2,3-1
      molar ratio
     Fig.  6 Dependence of compressive strength of soil samples
             stabilized with UF resins  modified by SP on molar
             ratio  F : U


             1      F :  SP  =  2.1  : 0.049

             2   -   F :  SP  =  2 .1  : 0.003
                             26

-------
Just prior to the tests . U was dissolved  in the resin in quantity  to achieve
the molar ratio  F:U =2.1:1.  Oxalic acid, introduced  as 10 percent solu-
tion, was chosen for the  hardener .  Measurement of gelling time were taken
at temperature  293 * 1°K  for the 30 percent resin solution of  the  molar
ratio F:U:SP= 2.1:1:0.0.49  at pH = 2 to 0.8  and for the 30 precent resin
solution of the molar ratio  F:U:SP =  2 .1:1:0.003,  at pH = 2.1 to 1.0.

TABLE  10. THE PROPERTIES OF THE RESINS MODIFIED BY SP
             OBTAINED  IN THE LABORATORY
	 T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Properties
	 	 	 — 	
Q
Density at 293 K in g/cm
Viscosity at 293°K in cP
pH at 293°K
Dry residue %
Acetate tolerance
Content of free F %
General appearance
Molar ratio F : U : SP
2.5:1:0.0583
1 .171
14
6.8 - 7.0
42
total
3.6
2.5:1:0.0584
1 .850
14
6.8 - 7.0
45
total
3.1
colorless, limpid, liquid
 PH range was restricted by the solubility of oxalic acid and by the influence
 of pH   2 on the gelling velocity of the solutions .  The obtained  results  of
 gelling time are  given in Figure 7 .  It was  concluded that the use of  acids
  at pH 2 to 1   enables control of gelling time of resins within the  range of
 6-40 minutes   (at temperature  293 K)  .  In the case of the resin with molar
 ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049,  a longer gelling time was observed in compari-
 son  to the resin of the molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0 .003 . This  effect is
 probably connected with modofication  of resin by SP . To  achieve  longer gel-
 ling times investigations concerning control of velocity of resin hardening
 by catalyzers like ammonium salts were also conducted. Solutions used for
 the investigations  were the same as in the case of hardening by oxalic  acid .
 Ammonium chloride was  used as a hardener  introduced  in the form of  25
 percent water solution in quantities  amounting  to 5 ml to 50 ml of  25 per-
 cent  NH4C1 in 100ml of 45 percent resin solution. Measurement tempera-
 ture  was  297  ± 1°K.  The results given in Figures 8 and 9 showed  gelling
 times  ranging  from 60 minutes to 100 minutes for the resin  of molar  ratio
 F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0.003  and for the resins of molar ratio F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049 .
                                   27

-------
 Q8   a9   1.0   1.1    1.2    1.3   1.4   1.5    V6   1.7   1.6   1.9   2.0   2.1    2.2   2.3
                                                                        pH
Fig .7  Influence of pH on gelling time of 30% UF resin solution
       modified by SP  hardened with  oxalic acid

        1   -  F :U:SP  =  2.1 : 1 : 0.003

        2   -  F : U:SP  =  2.1; 1 : 0.049
                               28

-------
0>
0)
bo
IvJUU
1320
1260
1200
1140
1080
1020
960
900
B40


/i8G j
4?n
360 .

300 .
240

180

120 .


6U

1
5










4'






3
^
2 ,
1 \



>

i








5

! \
! V
I
\
\


^ \j
rV^**--
X^

















V

)
V.

^

£

















^
^

.^
(

















6
^v^.^


i


)


f


zg*;
















i
i






"K
















i
)









































































C


























>

>


                 10        2Q       30       40        50
                     ml  25% NH4C1/100 ml of resin

     Fig.8  Gelling  times of 30% UF resins (F:U:SP=2 .1:1:0 .003)
            hardened  with  ammonium chloride  (l)  and ammonium
            chloride buffered with hexamethylenetetramine
             (urotropin)  in quantities :  0,5g  (2) ,  l,0g  (3) ,
            2 , 0 g  (4)  ,  3 , 0 g  (s) , 4 , 0 g  ©  ,  per 100" ml of
            resin
                           29

-------
                    ml 25% NH4C1/100 ml of resin


Fig. 9  Gelling  times of 30% UF resin solution   (F:U:SP =
       2.1:1:0.049) hardened  with  ammonium  chloride (l)
       + ammonium chloride  buffered with hexamethylene-
       tetramine  (urotropin)  in  quantities : 0.5g  (2) ,
       l,0g  (3) ,  2,0g (4)  ,  3,0g (5) -,  4,0g  (6)  , per  100 ml
       of resin
                      30

-------
   1440
CO
o>
r-H
i—I

-------
 to
 ID
 OJ
o
    1680 J
    1620
•S   1560
JL
    (500
1440

1380

1320
                                  2Q7°K
      60
                               30        40
                  ml 25$ NH4C1/100 ml of resin
                                                      50
      Fig.11  Gelling times of  30$ UF re'sin solution (F:U:SP =
              =2 .1:1:0 .049J hardened with ammonium chloride
              buffered  with thriethylenetetramine  (TETA)
              in  quantities:  0.5 ml  (l) ,  1 ml (2)  ,1,5 ml (3)
              2 ml  (4) ,   2,5 ml (5)  , per 100 ml of resin
                          32

-------
They only slightly  depend on the quantity of the introduced  ammonium chlo-
ride . Gelling time  for the resins of the molar ratio F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0 .049
is found to be longer as it is in the case of the acids . A wide range of control
of gelling time up to  24 hours at temperature  297 K, was possible to obtain
by an  additional introduction  of hexamethylene tetramine  in the  quantity
of  0.5 to 4.0 gram  per  100 ml of 45 percent resin and triethylene-tetramine
in the quantity of 0.5 to 2.5 ml in 400 ml of  45 percent resin to the resin
sample hardened by  ammonium chloride  (Figures  10 and ll)  .   Larger
amounts of amines  makes precise  determination of gelling times difficult.

The use of the hardener in the form  of hydrochloric  acid buffered with mo-
nobasic ammonium phosphate  was  investigated for the  previously utilized
resins of the molar ratio F:U:SP = 2 .5:1:0 .00357 and  2 .5:1:0 . 0583 . Measure-
ments were taken at temperature  293°F -IK. To achieve the  molar
ratio F:U= 2 .1:1,  U was dissolved  in the resin before measurements. Com-
position  of  the investigated  solutions and the obtained gelling  times  are
given  in Table 11 .
TABLE 11.
COMPOSITION OF THE  RESIN SOLUTIONS HARDENED
BY HYDROCHLORIC ACID BUFFERED  WITH MONO-
AMMONIUM PHOSPHATE AND GELLING TIMES
OBTAINED  AT  TEMPERATURE  293°K.
Molar
ratio of
reagents
in resin
F:U:SP

2,1:1:0,003


_

2,1:1:0,049


' 	
_
NH4H2P04
(g)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1

HC1
36%
(ml)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.5
1 .0
2
0.5
1
t-\

Water
(ml)
7.7
7 .8
7.9
8.0
8.1
7 .7
7.2
0.2
8.6
8.1
7.1
	
	 1
resin
(ml)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20

initial
PH
(pH)
	 	 -,
2.6
2 .5
3.1
3.5
3.9
2.5
1 .8
0.9
-


gelling
time
(min)
56
76
111
127
187
_ ~ ~ ~1
145
37
7
85
15
3
>_ 	
                                  33

-------
ra
0)
a
OJ
   303
   298
   293
   288
   283 .
                                                   300       360       «20
                                                       gelling time  (min)
   Fig .12  The influence of UF resin (F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0,003) hardened
            with oxalic acid (l)  , hydrochloric  acid buffered  with
            monobasic  ammonium phosphate  (2)  and  ammonium
            chloride  (3j on gelling  times
                                    34

-------
  303,
  296._
n)
f-,
a 2Q3
6
0) .
H
  288
  283
                       120
180       240       300       360   ,    420

                     gelling time  (minj
                                                                             460
  Fig.  13  The  influence of LtF resins  (F:U:SP =2,1:1:0,049) hardened
          with  oxalic  acid (1) ,  hydrochloric  acid buffered with mono-
          basic  ammonium  phosphate (2)  and ammonium  chloride  (3)
          on gelling  times .
                                   35

-------
Results indicate that hardening of the resins by strong acids buffered  with
ammonium salts of weak acids control gelling times ranging from 40 minutes
to 100 minutes at  293°K.

Resin gelling times are also temperature dependent. To enable  conversion
of gelling times obtained at 293 K  and  297°K  into times  defined by various
thermal  conditions  existing in soil, temperature  coefficients of the resin
hardening reaction  were determined .  They are identical with the temperature
coefficients  of the velocity of chemical reactions :

                          n = *g (T + 10)
 where tg    -  gelling time evaluated at  temperature  T
        6 JL
 and  t  (T+IO)  -  at temp.  T +  10
      o

 The sample volume of 30 ml of resins in a water temperature bath were tested
 in  temperatures  ranging from 283   to 301  K.  The hardener and  the resin
 were controlled at a constant temperature for 20 minutes under the  measu-
 rement conditions before they were mixed together . The resins investigated
 were those listed in Table 10. U was dissolved in the resins immediately be-
 fore they were mixed with the hardener .  The resin with  the ratio  F:U : SP =
 2.1:1:0.003  was hardened  by 10 ml of 10 percent solution  oxalic  acid in 20
 ml resin.  10 ml of 15 percent ammonium chloride in 20 ml of resin:  and  0.4
 ml of 36 percent HC1  and  2 g NH^i'PO. in 10 ml of solution  in  20 ml of
 resin.  The resin with molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049 was hardened  by
 10 ml of 10 percent oxalic acid solution in 20 ml of resin :  10 ml of 15 percent
 ammonium  chloride solution  in 20 ml of resin : and 1 ml of 36 percent hydro-
 chloric acid and 2 g of ammonium  dihydrogen phospate  in  10 ml  of  solution.
 in 20 ml of resin.

 The gelling  times obtained  at different temperatures are given in Figures 12
 and  13 . Calculations  of temperature coefficients of the hardening reaction
 of UF resins modified by SP was  n - 2 .3:2 .6 for acids and oci/la hnffprpd
 with  monobasic ammonium  phosphate  but for ammoni nn •  ; •'••
 Test results ,  however,  showed the SP modifications  1o have no  mHuence
 on the  estimated  n values .  Exceptionally high  temperature coefficients,
 estimated for the  velocity of hardening of resins with  ammonium  salts,  re-
 sult  from  the variable  catalyst density  (hydronium ions) and depend on the
 velocity of F reaction with ammonium ions .

 Resin gelling time was found to be related to an  increase  of solution visco-
 sity which begins occuring the very moment the resin  is mixed with  the  har-

                                   36

-------
   120
PH
O
o
o
100 J



90



80



70



60



50



40
    30
    10
                               293°K
                     8    10    12
                                      14   16   16   20


                                      time  (min)
   Fig . 14  Changes of viscosity during gelling time

            of30%resin  solution  (F:U:SP = 2, 1:1:0, 049)

            hardened with oxalic acid.
                        37

-------
        60
360    4ZQ     480
  time \mir\]
Fig. 15  Changes of viscosity of 30 °/o UF resin solution
        (F:U:SP= 2 .1:1:0.049) during hardening with
         ammonium chloride (l) and ammonium chloride
         buffered with hexamethylenetetramine in quantities
         0,50g  (2) ,  2.0g(3) ,  and 4.0g (4) .
                        38

-------
   5,
W
ex
100
          90
         80.
         70
          60.
       en
       o
          30




          20




          10
             fcl
                                          296° K
                                                         ^
                                                           N
               120    240  360   480  600  720  640  960  10GO  tfOO   1320


                                              time  (minj






    Fig. 16 Changes of viscosity  (l) and  pH (2)  of 30% UF

             resin solution (F:U:SP = 2, 1:1:0 .049)  during

             hardening  with  ammonium  chloride buffered

             with thriethylenetetramine.
                              39

-------
dener. To  characterize changes of viscosity during gelling process, visco-
meter investigations were carried out on the chosen resin of the following
ratio  F:U:SP= 2 .1:1:0.049 .  Resin with properties  given in Table 8 was
hardened by the following,  after  U was dissolved in it.

  1    50 ml of 10 percent oxalic  acid in 100 ml of  resin ;
  2    50 ml of 15 percent ammonium chloride solution with 100 ml of resin ;
  3    50 ml of 15 percent ammonium chloride,  with addition  of 0.5, 2 and 4g
      of urotropin to 100 ml of resin ;
  4    50 ml of 15 percent ammonium chloride solution and  2.5 ml of triethyle-
      netetramine  to 100 ml of resin.

Measurements  were carried out at temp. 293 - 0.2 K,  295  - 0.2  K,  296  -
0.2 K.  Changes of solution viscosity were registered in time intervals  of
approximately  15  minutes. Figures 14,,  15, and 16 illustrate  the course of
the changes .

Results obtained with the  resin solution hardened by the acid gradually chan-
ges its viscosity.  Viscosity changes are comparatively small for 1/2 to 2/3
of the gelling time . In the last period viscosity  increases  markedly .

On  the other hand resin solution hardened by ammonium chloride (Figure 14)
or ammonium chloride with amines added to it (Figures 14,  15 and  16J  are
characterized by the  rapid transition of low-viscosity solution  into gel. with
a  gradual  increase of the concentration of hydronium ions .

STABILIZATION  OF  SOIL  WITH UF  RESINS  MODIFIED BY SP

UF resins  introduced to the soil stabilized it after  hardening. Investigations
of the properties of soil  strengthened and sealed by  UF resins  SP modified
were  carried out  for the  resins of  following molar  ratio  F:U:SP =2.1:1:0;
2.1:1:0.003;  2.1:1:0.0097; 2.1:1:0.049;  and  2.1:1:0.097.  Table 12 illustra-
tes properties of the resins used in these  experiments .

Resin solutions of the concentration  15,20,25,30  and 40 percent were harde
ned with oxalic acid at a pH 2.  The samples of stabilized soils were  stored
underwater  during 7 clays.  After this period  they  were  tested for uniaxial
compressive strength and  their coefficients  of-permeability.  The obtained
results  are given in Figures  17 and 18.
                                  40

-------
IZ-IO
                                       30                 AQ
                                   resin  concentration (%)
  Fig , 17  Compressive strength  of soil samples stabilized
           by UF  re'sin modified  by SP  hardened with oxalic
           acid
           1
           2
           3
           4
           5
F:U:SP =
F:U:SP -
F:U:SP =
F:U:SP =
F:U:SP =
2 1:1:0
2,1:1:0,003
2,1:1:0,0097
2,1:1:0,03
2 1:1:0,049
                         41

-------
                    20
      30                40
resin concentration  (%)
Fig.18  Coefficients of permeability  k   of soil samples
        scaled with UF resin modified  by PS  hardened
        by oxalic acid

        1     F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0
        2     F:U:SP = 2,1 :1:0,003
        3     F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0,0097
        4     F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0,03
        5     F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0,049
                         42

-------
TABLE  12.  PROPERITIES OF UF RESINS MODIFIED  BY  ADDITION
             OF DIFFERENT QUANTITIES OF SP
Reagents
molar ratio
F:U:SP
2.1:1:0
2.1:1:0,003
2.1:1:0,0097
2.1:1:0,030
2.1:1:0,049
2.1:1:0,097
Viscosity
at 293°K
(cP)
	
20 - 1
22 - 1
24 - 1
22 - 1
22 - 1
23 * 1
i_ 	 , 	 ,_-__ 	
Density
at 293°K
(g/cm )
	 1
1 .170
1 .170
1 .173
1 .178
1 .179
1 .189
i 	
Dry
residue
(•/•)
44
44
44
45
46
48
i
L 	 	
pH
7.0 +- 0.2
7.0^ 0.2
7.0^ 0.2
7.0* 0.2
7.0* 0.2
7.0- 0.2
 In the case of resins of the molar ratio  F:U:SP= 2.1:1:0.097, the  stabilized
 soil samples swelled  and cracked when placed in water . For this reason
 they were not tested. Results of  soil samples  given in  Figure 18 with resins
 of 40 percent concentration  and molar  ratio  F:U:SP =  2.1:1:0.003  have the
 maximum  uniaxial compressive  strength  1.15'10  N  -m   .  The  increase
 of resin concentration and quantity  of SP used for  modification are  follo-
 wed by a  decrease of coefficients  of permeability  of  the soil samples sealed
 with resins hardened by oxalic acid .  The influence of  modification  in highly
 noticeable especially  with small resin  concentration of 15 percent and  20
 percent.  For those concentrations the  decrease  of sand coefficient of per-
 meability  from  6  • 10"2 m  • s   to 2 . 3 • 10" 7m -s  1  and 2 .3 • 10" 8m • s" 1  was
 obtained  at the reagents molar ratio F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0, 049  (Figure 18) .Two
 kinds of resins were chosen for  the further  investigations  of the  problem
 of sealing of the soils  having  comparatively   high water permeability.  The
 resins were F:U:SP with  a molar ratio of 2 .1:1:0.049  and F:U:SP   with  a
 molar ratio  of  2.1:1:0.003.

 For the investigations of the chosen resins ammonium  chloride was  used  to
 measure  effects of soil strengthening  and sealing. The samples were  made
 from sand, stabilized  with resin solutions of concentrations  15,  20, 25, 30,
 35  and 40 percent. They were further  hardened by ammonium chloride  to
 the quantity  of  6.5 percent weight  in  relation to 45 percent of resin solu-
 tion. The tests for compressive  strength were made after 7 clays of samples
                                  43

-------
                                       30                40
                                   resin  oonrpnlrntion  0£J
Fig. 19  Compressive  strength of soil samples stabilized with 111'1
        resin modified by SP  hardened with  ammonium chloride

        1 -  F:U:SP =  2.1:1:0.003

        2 -  F:U:SP =  2.1:1:0.049
                          44

-------
Fig.20   30 percent  UF  resin modified by SP have molar
         ratio (F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.003) filling the space
         among sand  grains.  Enlargement  200x. Microsection
         taken by differential method with use  of MPI -  5
         microscope.
                    45

-------
storage under water. The results are given in Figure 19 .   They denote high
strength of the soil stabilized by resins modified  with SP and hardened
with ammonium salt.  For example, the soil samples strengthened with 40
percent resin solution  of molar ratio F:U:SP= 2.1:1:0.003  obtained a com-
pressive   strength  1.41  "10  N/m   (Figure  19J  .
Soil stabilization impacted by the effect of SP modification  of UF  resin is
probably connected with polymer formation characterized by  more hydro-
philic  properties.  Due to this, the proper structure is created  especially
in the  solutions dilute with acids .  Hardening with ammonium  chloride pro-
vides  a hydrophilic polymer due to the gradual changes of pH of the solu-
tion.  In this case modification  with larger  SP quantities  appears to be
detrimental especially when the structural properties  are of concern.

Soil stabilization with UF resins results from filling of pores  between the
mineral grains .  Adhesion to the minerals leads to the considerable  stren-
gthening and  sealing .

To investigate  the polymer structure between  the soil  grains,  the micro-
scopic  observation  of fracture  surface of water stored samples  and their
                       /            \                       1
geologic ground  joints  (^dry  samplesj  were carried out with the use  of
stereoscopic microscope (enlargement x lOOJ and  interference-polarization
microscopes MPI-5  (enlargements x 180j .  Soils  observed were strengthe-
ned with 30 percent resin solution of the molar ratio  F:U:SP  = 2 .1:1:0 . 003
hardened  with  oxalic acid .  Structures   of the samples stored in water envi-
ronment revealed  the spaces among soil grains  to be  filled completely
with polymer.  At the sand grain surfaces,  microfissures  were not observed
to exist. Microscopic  obserwations of ground joints indicate that  the  flow
of water through  the samples   stabilized by  UF  resins is possible due  to
microfissures  occuring within the gel structure   (Figure 2o) .
                                 46

-------
                             SECTION VII

       INFLUENCE  OF  PLASTICIZATION OF SP -MODIFIED  UF
       RESINS ON PROPERTIES  OF  SOILS STABILIZED BY THEM


OBJECTIVE AND  DIRECTIONS OF INVESTIGATION

Jn order to improve the strengt.li proper-ties and water permeability of soils
stabilized  by SP-modified UF  resins, tests were conducted with the  Follo-
wing plasticizers  oF  resins :  (l)  ethylene glycol  (EG),  (2)  diethylene glycol
/DEC,/,  (3)  Furfuryl alcohol (FA),   (0  e-caprolactarn  (CL) and  (s) acry-
loarnide (AA).  In the case of acryloamide  additional polymer  cross-linkage
is obtained by  means of polymerization.  In view of its advantageous  pro-
perties, the resin  selected for investigation  had the molar ratio  oF F:U:SP =
=2.1:1:0.003  and was hardened by muriatic acid buffered by monobasic
ammonium phoshate  (2.5 ml of 36 percent HC1 and  1 Og  of  Nil^2^0^ per
100 g of resin) .   The other resin had the molar ratio  of  F:U:SP= 2.1:1:0.049
and was hardened  by oxalic acid (at pFI  1 .8 to 1 .7 ) .  In  the case  of the resin
containing  AA, ammonium  persulphate was added to the hardener as a poly-
merization initiator  (l8 ml of 10 percent solution per 100 ml of  resin) .
The properties of resins under investigation are shown in Table 5 . The soils
were  stabilized by resins of a uniform concentration  (about 30 percent) and
were  examined  fo>" eompressive  slrength after  7 days of storage  in water
and after  14 clays  of storage in the open  air, and coefficients of permeability
after 7  clays of storage in wafer .

PLASTICIZATION OF RESINS BY ETHYLENE GLYCOL (EG) AND
DIETIIYLENE GLYCOL  (l)EG)

UF resins  plastified  by glycol are used as grouts; i.e.,  Soviet  ME-17
resin  »  lj. In view of a  relatively  high  cost of glycols, they  were added
in  ratios  of 2.5   to 15  parts  of volume per 100 parts  of resin.

The strength tests carried out for soil  samples stabilized  by these  resins
shows  (Tables 13 and  14J  samples stored in water  reach  a higher strength
in the case of the  DEC  plasticizer  (s.5'106 N/m )  at  5 parts by volume
of DEC,  per 100 parts of resin and F:U:SP= 2 .1:1:0 .003 and  3 .58-10°  N/m2 at
                                 47

-------
TABLE 13. INFLUENCE  OF PLASTICIZATION OF  SP-MODIFIED UF
           RESINS BY MEANS OF EG ON THE COMPRESSIVE
           STRENGTH AND THE COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY
           OF SOILS STABILIZED BY THEM
Molar
ratio
F:U:SP
in resin


2.1:1:0.003




2.1:1:0.049


EG content
(EG parts of
volume per
1 00 p .0 .v .
of resinj
2.5
5
7 .5
10
15
2.5
5
7 .5
10
15
Compressive strength
(N/m2)
samples
stored
in water
C
6 .64-10
6.36:106
6.20:106
5 .62-106
5 .50-106
2.90-106
2.74'10f3
3.18-106
3 .34-106
2.98-106
samples
stored
in the
open air
7 .70: 106
3-80:l06
3.43:106
3.08-106
3.68-106
2.04-106
2 . 28 ' 1 O6
2.41 -106
2.29-106
2.26-106
Coefficient
of permeabi-
lity
(m/s)
3-1 -10"9
- 9
3-G'lO
4.5 -10" 9
8.5 -10"9
1 .7 -10"9
3 .8-10'9
9.0'10-]°
6.6-10" 9
- 9
2.7 -10
6.3-10"9
                             48

-------
TABLE  14. INFLUENCE OF  PLASTICIZATION OF SP-MODIFIED
           UF RESINS BY MEANS OF DEC  ON THE COMPRESSIVE
           STRENGTH OF SOILS STABILIZED BY  THEM
Molar
ratio
F:U:SP
in resin


2.1:1:0.003




2.1:1:0.049

	 	 	 j
DEC content
(DEC parts of
volume per 100
p .0 .v .of resin)
2.5
5
7.5
10
15
2.5
5
7 .5
10
15
( 2^
Compressive strength (jNT/m )
_
samples
stored
in water
*" - 	 1
7 .65' 106
8.05 • 106
7.85- 10G
7 .65-106
7.10-106
i 	 .,
3.19-106
3.14-106
3.06'106
3.38-106
3.58-106
r
samples
stored
open air
2.34-106
2.39-106
1
2.82'IQ6 '
1
2.99'IG6
I
2.94-106
1 .41 -106
1 .72-10°
1 .95 -10°
2 .00-106
2.39-10°
	
                              49

-------
15 parts by volume of DEC per 100 parts of resin and at F:U:SP=2 .1:1:0.049 .
In the case of the E G plasticizer  a  continuous fall  of  strength is recorded
for the resin of the molar ratio F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.003.  A  slight maximum of
strength is recorded for the resin of the molar ratio F:U:SP= 2 . 1:1:0 . 049
at 15 parts by volume of EG  per 100 parts of  volume of the resin.

Similar changes occur in the compressive  strength of  samples  stored in the
open air  (Tables 13  and u)  . As a  result  of glycol addition,  a drop in the
compressive strength  was obtained in the  case of the resin of the molar
ratio  F:U:SP=2 .1:1:0.003.  On the other hand  plasticization of  the  resin
of the molar ratio F:U:SP= 2.1:1:0.049 results  in an  increase of strength
to2.41-106 N/m2  (for EG) and  to  2.39-106 N/m2  (for  DEG) .

Water permeability  through the EG  plasticization  stabilized  soil  sain pies
does not depend  on the volume  of the added glycol. Coefficients of permeabi-
lity  range between 0.9 '10   m/s  for  both kinds  of resins under investiga-
tion  (Tables 13 and 14) .

PLASTTC1ZATION OF RESINS BY FURFURYL ALCOHOL  (FA)
                                                                       23
FA  addition  to  UF  resins was  attempted  to  raise properties of resin
In the tests, FA  was added  0.5  to  4  parts of volume per  100 parts of volu-
me of resin.  Strength measurements  carried out for soil samples stabilized
by resins  prepared  in this manner  have shown that soil samples stabilized
by the UF resin of the  molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.003  and stored  in water
 (Table 15)  indicated  a drop in strength along with the  increasing FA  con-
tent  in the resin. On the other hand the compressive strength of soil  sam-
ples   stabilized  by  the UF resin of the molar ratio F'U:SP = 2 . 1: 1 : 0 . 049
increases  as  a result  of plasticization up  to4.60'10   N/m  . Decrease
of the  compressive  strengt of soil samples  stabilized  by the resin (F:U:SP =
= 2.1:1:0.003)  plastified by  FA  was also noted for  Ihose  stored in the open
air.  The  samples stabilized by the resin  (F:U:SP = 2 . 1 :1 :0 . 049) plastic Lzed
by FA  increase  their strength  up  tol.32'103 N/m"  along  with the growing-
content of plasticizer .  Water permeability of the stabilized soil samples was
not affected  by the FA content which oscillate between   l.l-10V^and 1.3 -10"9
for both  the resins  under investigation  (Table  is) .
PLASTICIZATION OF RESINS  BY E-CAPROLACTAM

CL is a widely used plasticizer  of UF resins .  No mention was found  in  the
available  literature  of its  application  as a component  of  UF grouting solu-
tions .  In  these  tests, CL  was varied  0.5 to 8  parts  by weight of  resin.
Measurements  have shown  an increase  of strength  in the  case of samples
stored in water  (Table 16)  due  to plasticization .   The maximum  measured
values were obtained on the resin of the molar  ratio  F:U:SP = 2 . 1 :1 :0 . 003 and

-------
TABLE 15.  INFLUENCE OF PLASTICIZATION OF SP-MODIFIED
           UF RESINS  BY MEANS OF FA ON  THE  COMPRESSIVE
           STRENGTH AND THE COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY
           OF SOILS STABILIZED BY THEM
Molar
ratio
F:U:SP
in resin
p-------~-------

2.1:1:0.003



2.1:1:0.049

FA content
(FA parts by
volume per
100 p.o.v .
of resin)
__ -_..__ .. .. _ra
0.5
1 .0
2.0
4.0
0.5
1.0
2.0
4.0
L 	
Compressive strength
(N/m2)
samples
stored
in water
_______
7 .16- 106
6.93- 106
6.67 ' 106
6.05' 106
3.69- 106
4.13- 106
4.34- 106
4.60- 106
samples
stored
in the
open air
i 	
3.89- 106
/-»
4.63' 10
f>
2.00' 10
1 .23' 106
0.94- 106
0.89' 106
1 .24' 106
1 .32- 106
Coefficient
of permeabi-
lity
(m/s)
3.6- 10"9
4.4 • 10"9
- 9
4.5' 10
2.3' 10"9
1 .1 • 10~8
3.3- 10~9
1.3- 10"9
4.7 ' 10~9
	
                             51

-------
TABLE 16.  INFLUENCE OF PLASTICIZATION  OF SP-MODIFIED
           UF RESIN  BY MEANS OF  CL ON  THE COMPRESSIVE
           STRENGTH AND THE  COEFFICIENT OF  PERMEABILITY
           OF SOILS  STABILIZED BY THEM
Molar
ratio
F:U:SP
in resin


2.1:1:0.003




2.1:1:0.049

	
r 	
CL content
(CL parts of
weight per
100 p.o.v.
of resinj
0.5
1.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
0.5
1 .0
2.0
4.0
8.0
Compressive strength
(N/m2)
samples
stored
in water
8.87 • 106
8.12- 106
9.04- 106
9.15 • 106
9.26' 106
_
4.67 -106
4.97' 106
4.40- 106
4.47" 106
3.79' 106
samples
stored
in the
open air
10.79- 10G
12 .08- 106
11 .14' 10G
10.81 ' 106
5.16' 106
0.48- 106
0.75' 10G
0.71 • 106
6.61 ' 106
4.90- 106
	
Coefficient
of permeabi-
lity
(m/s)
1 .9' 10~9
- 9
3.5 -10
2 .2 '10~9
1.8- 10~9
4.0' 10"9
(
2.4' 10"9
1 .4' 10~9
1.9-10-10
1 .8' 10"9
- Q
1.0-10
                             52

-------
TABLE 17. INFLUENCE OF AA ADDITION TO SP-MODIFIED UF RESINS
           ON THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND THE COEFFICIENT
           OF PERMEABILITY OF SOILS STABILIZED  BY THEM
Molar ratio
F:U:SP
in resin

2. 11:1:0. 003-0. 0084
2.13:1:0.003:0.021
2.15:1:0.003-0.042
2.28:1:0.003-0 .16

2. 11:1:0. 049:0. 0084
2.13:1:0.049:0.021
2.15:1:0.049:0.042
2.20:1:0.049:0.084
2.28:1:0.049:0.16
Compressive strength
(N/m2)
samples
stored
in water

7 .14 ' 106
5 .35- 106
3.49- 106
2 .06- 106
2.06' 106
2.18' 106
2.56'IQ6
2.28* 106
samples
stored
in the
open air
7 .28- 106
4.78' 106
2.30- 10G
5.35' 106
*-i
0.29- 10
0.55- 106
£»
0.45 • 10
0.96' 106
0.96' 106
Coefficient
of permeabi-
lity (m/s)

- 9
7.3-10
5.1 • 10'9
8.6' 10"9
4.0- 10~9
2.2- 10"9
1.7- 10"9
5 .8 -10"9
- 9
1.0-10
3.9" 10"9
	 _ _ _ __
                              53

-------
8 parts by weight of CL  per 100 parts of weight of the resin  (9.26-10 N/m )
and  in the resin of the molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049 using one  part by
weight of CL per  100 parts of weight of the resin  (4.97 -10b N/m ) . CL also
raises the compressive  strength  of samples  stored in the open air .^ Resig
of the molar ratio F:U:SP =  2.1:1:0.003  had  strengths  ofl2.08'10  N/m"
as a result of  addition  of 1 .0 parts of weight of CL per  100 parts of weight
of the resin. Resin of the molar  ratio  F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0 .049 and 6  parts of
weight of CL per 100 parts  of weight of the resin resulted  in  a maximum
.strength  of6.61'106 N/m2; i.e.,  where no  stresses  due to humidity chan-
ges  are  recorded.

PLASTICIZATION OF RESINS  BY  ACRYLOAMIDE  (AA)
                                                                    *>
Publication  of results on soils  stabilized by UF resins containing AA  indi-
cate  they increase strength and water  impermeability.    AA is  however
relatively expensive  and raises  the stabilization  costs . For this  reason
AA  was added  in small  quantities  of 0.0084   0.16 mole per  1 mole  of
urea.  The resins had at the same time  a constant molar  ratio of F:CONHr,=
= 1.05:1 .

Strength  tests on the soil samples  stabilized by resins prepared  in  this
manner (Table 11) have  shown  that samples stabilized  by the resin of the
molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.003  are   characterized  by a strength decrea-
sing  along with' the growing  AA  content, both  in the case  of storage in
water and in the  open air .  Only in  the case of samples  stabilized by the resin
of  the molar ratio  F:U:SP  = 2 .1:1:0.049 shows  a slight   increase of strength
as the AA  content increase. It  was also  found that  within  the  range  of tes-
ted  AA concentrations , water  permeability of the stabilized soil  samples
was not significantly affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of this investigation, the best results were  obtained  with
SP-morJified  UF  resins  plasticized by  e-caprolactam.  The  soil  samples
stabilized by the plasticized  resin  of the molar ratio F:U:SP = 2 .1:1:0 .003
showed  an  increase of the  compressive  strength of about 50 percent if sto-
red in water and about  100 percent if  stored in the open air, as  compared
with  the  values  obtained for non-plasticized resins . Similarly in the  resin
of the molar ratio F:U:SP=  2.1:1:0.049  soil stabilized by plasticized resins
have shown  an increase of the compressive  strength of  about 60  percent  if
stored in  water  abd about 20 times  if stored in the open air, as  compared
with  the  values  obtained for the nonplasticized  resins .

Application of other plasticizers : EG , DEG,  FA or AA has  brought only a
slight increase of strength or, in  some cases, even  a drop of strength.  PlasH-
cization  of SP-modified UF resin  by EG,DEG, FA and AA has  na major in-
fluence on the water  permeability of soils sealed  by  these resins either.
                                  54

-------
                          SECTION VIII


  AGING CHANGES IN SOILS STABILIZED BY SP-MODIFIED UF RESINS

Soils stabilized by UF resins are characterized by long-term durability. 17,
19,  24, 25 The hitherto published results indicate however certain changes of
their properties.  Investigations in this respect usually concern short periods
and do not combine changes of permeability and strength. In the case of appli-
cation of SP-modified UF  resins to stabilization,  additional aging effects con-
nected with modification should be expected.

In  order to determine  the aging  changes in the SP-modified  UF resins the
following tests were conducted on soils stabilized by them:

    a compressive strength test on samples  stored  in  water,

    a compressive strength test on samples  stored  in air at  the relative
    humidity of 45  - 60 percent

    a test concerning  the coefficient of filtration on samples stored in
    water.
               >                                     i

Samples were stabilized by 30 percent resin solutions of the molar ratios
of  F:U:SP =  2. 5:1:0. 0357 and  2. 5:1:0. 0583 in which  urea was dissolved to
obtain the molar ratio of F:U = 2.1:1.  Properties  of  the  applied resins  are
shown in Table 5.  Resin of the molar ratio  2.1:1:0.003 was then hardened by
a solution of muriatic acid buffered by monobasic ammonium phosphate  (o. 2
ml  36 HC1 and lOg NH^J-^PC^ in 100 ml of resin).  The resin  of the  molar
ratio of F:U:SP =  2. 1:1:0.049  was hardened by a solution of oxalic acid   at
pH 2.  After  24 hours the samples were removed from  molds an1' c ' -  j
under the formerly described  conditions.

Tests concerning the uniacial compressive strength and  measurements of
the  coefficient  of filtration were  carried out after 1, 2,  4, 7, 14, 30  and
90  days. Results  obtained for samples stabilized  by the  resin of the molar
ratio F:U:SP = 2.5:1:0.003 are  shown in Figure 21 and for those  stabili-
zed by the resin of  the molar ratio F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049 in Figure  22
ratio F:U:SP = 2,1:1:0.003,  showed the  strength  of  the  soil samples stored
in  water increases up to the  seventh day reaching the  value  of 6.05. 106
N/m2. Afterwards it falls, quickly between the seventh and twenty  first

                                   55

-------
day after reaching the  maximum value and the slowly decreases through the
ninetieth day. After 90 days,  the uniaxial compressive strength reaches
4. 68-106 N/m2. Changes of strength of samples stored in the ooen air were
quite similar to those stored in water. The maximum  strength (5.75- 10
N/m2)  occurs a little earlier, namely after  4 days. Then a fall of the
strength  to 4. 76- 106  N/m2 after  90  days of storage. This  decrease  is
particularly quick between  the  7 th and the 30 th day of  storage.

Results concerning the sample strength were closely paralleled with the chan-
ges of  the coefficient of permeability.   The maximum strength of samples
stored  in water Corresponds with the  maximum value of  the coefficient  of
permeability- 5. 2- lO'7  m/s. Then, between the 7th  and  the 30th day, a rapid
decrease of the  coefficient of permeability (down to 1. 9. 10~9 m/s)oceund  si-
milar to the decrease of strength.  Afterwards  the  value of the  coefficient
remains rather stable  and amounts to about 1. 10"^ m/s   (Figure 21 j.
 Samples  stabilized  by the  resin of the ratio F:U:SP  =  2.1:1:0.049 and harde-
 ned by oxalic acid indicated  the  maximum strength (2. 93- 10^ N/m^occured
 after  14  days  of  storage  in water (Figure  22).  After  reaching the maximum
 value, the strength  drops  rather quickly to 2.61*10° N/m2.  Samples  stored
 in the open air revealed no maximum strength, and decreased from 2. 48" 10^
 N/m2  after  the first day  to 2. 9" 105 N/m2  after 90 days.  The most rapid
 dall of strength occurs  between the 7th and the 14th day (from  2. 04" 10^'  to
 5. 6« 10  N/m2J.  Coefficient  of  permeability results  presented in Figure 22
 shows the maximum value  of the  coefficient of permeability (2. 1" 10" ^  m/sj
 for the resin of the  molar  ratio F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049 was  obtained about the
 same  time as the maximum strength of samples stored in water.  The chan-
 ges of the coefficient of filtration recorded in this cas"e are, similarly to tho-
 se of the  compressive  strength,  relatively small,

 The maximum strength  values of  samples stabilized by  resins of the molar
 ratios F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.033  and 2.1:1:0.049 and the  maximum values of the
 coefficient of filtration correlated with them,  result  from  changes undergoing
 in the hardened resin (polymerj  structure.  At the maximum strength,  the
 polymer  probably reaches the  highest rate of cross- linkage or the lowest
 swelling  capacity. The  decrease  of strength of samples stored  in water  re-
 corded afterwards in most likely due  to a decrease  of the  polymer  cross-
 linkage as a result of a partial  hydrolysis. A decrease of the  rate of cross-
 linkage raises the swelling capacity.  Thus  the size of microfissures in the
 gel structure diminishes  hindering water permeability. The fall of strength
 of samples stored in the open air is caused by occurence of  microcracks  in
 the polymer gel structure  under  the  influence of  stresses brought about by
 changes of humidity. The  resin of a  more  hydrophylic  structure,  i.e. of the
 molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049 is  particularly subject  to  these stresses.
 This was confirmed by results  of the strength tests (Figure 22).  Occurrence
 of microcracks was observed by microscope  in  the fracture surfaces  of test
 samples.

                                  56

-------
                                          storage time fdaysj
Fig.  21  The compressive strength and the coefficient of permeabi-
        lity of soil  samples  stabilized by SP-modified UF  resin.
        The strength values for  samples  stored in water (ij  and
        in the open  air  (2),  the  coefficients of permeability kw (¥).
                               57

-------
  7,
   6
1
bfl
0
                 10     20     30      40      50     60     70     60
90
                                               storage time (days)
     Fig.  22  The compressive  strength and the coefficient of per-
              meability of soil  samples stabilized by SP-modified
              UF resin of the molar  ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.049.
              The  compressive  strength of samples stored in water
              (l) ,  and in the  open air  (2j ,  the coefficient of per-
              meability of samples stored  in water kw
                                   58

-------
      20   40   60   80   100   120   (40  160   180  200  220   2«50  260  280   300
                                                       storage time (days)
Fig.  23   Changes of  compressive strength of soil samples sta-
          bilized  by UF resin hardened by  various hardeners:  oxa-
          lic acid  (ij  , ammonium chloride  (2)  and muriatic  acid
          buffered by monobasic ammonium  phosphate  (¥)  .
                                59

-------
The course of aging changes  in  soil samples  stabilized by  UF resins  also
is  influenced by the kind of applied hardener.  Tests carried out  on soil
samples  stabilized by a 30  percent resin solution of the molar ratio F:U:SP =
2.1:1 = 0.003 (after U was solved)  was hardened by one  of the following:

1.  Oxalic acid  solution (pH  2J  ;
2.  Ammonium  chloride  (50ml of 15 percent solution per 100 ml of re sin) and
3.  Muriatic acid and monobasic  ammonium phosphate  (_2, 0 ml of 36 percent
   HC1 and lOg NH4H2PO4 per  100 ml of  resin).

After 24 hours the samples were  taken out of molds and put into water. The
tests were limited to the  strength  measurements.  Prior results have been
presented between changes  of compressive  strength and the coefficient per-
meability for common hardeners.  The compressive strength was  tested
after 1,  2, 4,  7,  14,  30, 90,  and 300 days.  The results are  presented in  Fi-
gure 23.  Their analysis shows that hardeners containing ammonium salts
reaches  maximum strength after 7 days of storage. Resins  using ammonium
chloride  reaches 8.05-10^  N/m2 and  then decreases gradually to  less than
7.  10" N/m .  Muriatic acid buffered with monobasic ammonium phosphate
reaches  a maximum  strength of 6.05-10° N/m2 on the 14th  day,  declines
rapidly for 15  days  and then  continues  gradually  to weaken  through the 300th
day to 4,10" N/m.2. The  course of  changes in the strength of soil samples
stabilized by resins  hardened  by oxalic acid is different.  The  strength
increases gradually  up to  9.90»10  N/m2 after 300 days.   The most  rapid
increase was recorded op to  the 14th  day when the samples arrived at the
strength of 7.98-106 N/m2.

The results indicate that if certain hardeners  (ammonium  salts) are used
for hardening of resins, the  stabilized samples  will be subject to an accele-
rated  aging process,

MECHANISM OF AGING CHANGES OCCURRING IN SOILS STABILIZED BY
UF  RESINS

The available publications  concerning  ageing of stabilized   soils are limited
to  description  of conditions of experiments and the  obtained results.  They do
not relate  properties of the soil with  changes in the polymer structure,
Rzhanitsin and  Bleskina, 24 as well as  Tshaykova25 have stated that  soils
strengthened by UF resins  are,  as a rule,  resistant to action of acid  media
of  pH>3  and neutral media or alkaline media of pH<13.  With the  present
state of  knowledge of UF resins, the following processes may be  expected to
occur in  the course  of aging  of  stabilized soils:

- hydrolysis of hardened resin catalyzed by acids  and  salts,
- diffusion of hydrolytic products,
- occurrence of microcracks in the polymer  gel  structure.
                                   60

-------
The processes are thought to be interconnected.  For  instance the rate of
the  polymer hydrolysis in the  soil may be  subject  to the rate  of removal
of reaction products form the medium,  e.g. by means  of diffusion.   This
removal  may  be  on the  other hand facilitated by microcracks in the  gel
structure.
Investigations concerning  the mechanism of aging processes  were carried
out  for the SP-modified UF resin of the molar ratio F:U:SP  = 2.1:1:0,003
but  conclusions drawn from there  may refer to all kinds  of UF  resins.

Hydrolysis  of hardened resin catalyzed by  acids

The urea-formaldehyde  reaction rate  and the polymer hydrolysis processes
are catalyzed  by  acids and by certain salts. ^o In order to determine  changes
caused by acid action in the hardened  resin structure elementary analyses
were  carried  out  of the UF polymer  extracted by 0. 1 HC1 (pH  !_) and distilled
water  (^pH 6. 5J.  A through refinement ot the  hardened resin providel for a
considerable  limitation of  diffusion impact on the results. The properties of
the  resin used is  shown in Table 5.  Before  hardening urea was solved in the
resin to obtain the  molar ratio  F:U:SP - 2.1:1:0.003.  Ammonium chloride was
used as  a hardener in  ratios of 50 ml of 15  percent  solution  of  NH4 Cl per
100 ml of resin.  After 7 days the  polymer was ground in a mortar and samples
of 3. 5 g each (_in  relation to the dry  residue mass j were taken. These  sam-
ples were then extracted by distilled water (j>H 6. 5J  and  by 0. 1  n HC1 (^pH 1~) .
The flow rate of water and 0. 1  n HC1  through the samples amounted to about
6 ml/h.  Extractions was carried  out  at room  temperature  and elementary
analyses of  polymer after 1, 3, 7, 10 and 21 days  for water and  after 1,  3,
7 and 10  days in   the case  of 0. 1  n extraction by the acid. The hardend resin
underwent an  entire hydrolysis  and dissolved in the    eluent. Based on results
characterizing the  polymer structure:
                                % C
1.  Molar ratio F:U      F:U =      	                             (2)
                                /O \~s T _.                               ^» S

    where: % C  = %  N -  0.428 and  % C    = % C - % C
               u                         1*               U

2.  Coefficient K^ characterizing  the  polymer  cross-linkage rate

                          „  .  % cu
                                     CH
                                    -CH -
    where:
           % Hn = % N.  0. 143

           % H   = % C  • 0.167
               r        r

                                61

-------
3.   Coefficient K  characterizing the number  of  methylol groups
                               %  C-CH2OH                         (4)
    where:    % C                  „, p
                 -CH2OH -  CF  -  lo ^


Quantities characterizing changes in the polymer structure  are  shown  in
Figure 24 and 25 and in Table 18.  Results  of water extraction  of  the  har-
dened UF resin (Figure 24)indicate  the molar ratio F:U  falls down from
1.61 after the first day to  1.50 after  21 days. This is exclusively at the
expense of hydrolysis of methylol  groups,  as  the  K2 coefficient increases
form  1.85 after the first  and 1.67 after 3  days to 2.37  after 21  days. The
KI  coefficient does not change in the  course of extraction,  oscillating
around 0.95.  This  proves  that methylene linkage which determines the  poly-
mer crosslinkage rate  does not  undergo hydrolysis under the conditions of
this investigation.

Different  changes  are noted  when extracting the resin with a 0. 1 n solution
of HC1 ^Figure 25j . In this  case after  24 hours the molar  ratio  F:U dimi-
nishes to 1.46 and after 7 days  to  1.29. After  10 days of extraction  this
value  does not change.  Therefore  it is  considered the molar ratio F:U =
1. 29 is the limiting value  for the  UF hardend resin,  below which the
cross-linked, insoluble structure disappears.  Destruction of the polymer
results  under these conditions from the hydrolysis  of both  the  methylol
and methylene linkage.  After 24 hours,  the K9 coefficient characterizing
                                              t-i
the number  of methylol groups in the  resin amounts to 2. 47 proving a
considerable fall of this number. After 3 days  however the number of methy-
lol  groups rises most  probably due to an increase of concentration of amide
and amine groups  resulting from hydrolysis of methylene linkage  (_K  = 1.92J.
Methylol  groups are in balance  with the amide and amine groups.  Between
the 3rd and  the 10th day the number  of methylol  groups  drops  slightly as
a result of a fall   of the total amount of formaldehyde in the polymer. The
K2  coefficient simultaneously grows from  1.92 after 3 days to  2.06  after
10  days.  During   the  time,  the  number of methylene bonds continuously
drops. After the first  day  of extraction, the KI coefficient  amounts  to 0.99
and after 3 days it reaches  a relatively high value of 1.20.  Between the
7th and the  10th day the number of methylene bonds  in the  polymer  is
already practically constant  (the KI coefficients oscillate around 1. 24 ) .
This  value of the KI coefficient  is  most probably the limiting  value  for the
polymer.  At K^ -  1,24 the hardened resin loses its  cross-linked structure.
The corresponding  molar ratio is F:U =  1.29.  This investigation  adds  to
information  presented  earlier that  shows the elementary analysis of UF
polymer stabilizing soils  may be used to evaluate the ageing characteristics
connected with hydrolysis.

                                62

-------
2,5

2.4.

2.3.

2.2.

2.1.

2.0.

1.9.

IB.

1.7.
      1.5 ,    1.66 n
      U.

      1.3.

      1.2.

      1.1.

      1.0 .

      0.9.

      0.8.

      0.7.
1.64

1.62

1.60.

1.58

1.56
I.5Z
         -x-
                     2   <    6    8    10    12    14   16   18   ZO    22
                                         extraction time  (days)
Fig. 24.   Changes in  the  structure  of  the  UF hardened resin
           extracted by  water.
           1.  molar ratio  U:F
           2.  KI coefficient  characterizing  the cross-linkage
              rate  of the polymer
           3.  K2 coefficient characterizing the number of methy-
              lol groups  in the polymer.
                             63

-------
2.5

Z4.

2.3.

2.2.

2.1

2.0.

1.9.

1,8.

1.7

1.6 J
CM
1.5.

W.

1.3.

1.2.

1.1 .

1.0.

0.9.

0.8.

0.7.
   Fig.  25.
                 12345.   6789    10

                                    extraction  time  (days)


         Changes in the structure of the hardened UF resin
         extracted by 0. 1  n solution of HC1

         1.  molar  ration  U:F
         2.  KI coefficient characterizing the cross-linkage
            rate  of the polymer
         3.  K2 coefficient characterizing the  number  of me-
            thylol  groups in the  polymer.
                                64

-------
TABLE 18. MEAN RESULTS  OF ELEMENTARY ANALYSIS OF UF RESIN
            EXTRACTED BY  DISTILLED  WATER AND 0, 1  N HC1
Eluent
Distilled
H2°
0.1 n
HC1
Extrac-
tion
time
	
1
3
7
10
21
	
1'
3
7
10
%N
20.78
29. 06
30.13
30.13
31.24
31.85
31.77
32.45
32.52
%C
33. 33
32. 29
32.89
33. 26
33.50
32.92
32.03
31.79
31.85
	 	 T~ 	
1
%H : %s
i
i
5.39! 0.80
5.39! 0.64
5.42! 0.76
5.31J 0.79
5. 40 ! 0.43
1
5.47J 0.74
5.72« 0.76
5.77; 0. 60
5.77! 0.59
	 	 i. 	
	
F/U
	
1.61
1.59
1.56
1.58
1.50
1.42
1.35
1.29
1.29
Ki
0.93
1.00
0,97
0,89
0,91
0,99
1.20
1.25
1.23
K2
1.85
1.67
1.90
2.13
2,37
2.47
1.92
2.02
2.06
Investigation has shown that results of an elementary analysis of UF polymer
stabilizing soils  may be treated as  comparable   criterion of aging advance
connected with hydrolysis.  It  should be  thought that channels in the polymer
structure precede the differences in the mechanical  properties  and  perme-
ability of sealed soils.  The results indicate that  hydrolysis of  the hardened
UF resin in  acid medium proceeds  simultaneously at a high rate. To deter-
mine  changes of strength  of  stabilized soil samples  stored in a water solu-
tion.  Samples were  stabilized by a  30  percent solution of resin (^properties
are shown in Table 5j .  Before hardening urea was added to this solution
to obtain the molar  ratio  2.1:1:0.003. The resin was hardened by oxalic
acid at  pH - 2;1.7;1,4;1 and ammonium chloride  in  50 mln of 15  percent
solution per  100  ml of resin (_use of ammonium chloride drops  pH in the
resin to  0.05J.  After removal from  the  molds,  the samples were  stored in
water  solutions.

Changes  of  pH values of the hardened resin  caused  by the  difference in con-
centration of hydronim  ions in the  sample changes  the properties of the
product.   Compressive strength tests were  carried out after 1,  2, 4_, 7,
14, 30 and 90 days  of storage in acid solutions. The obtained results are
shown in Table  19.  These  results  indicate in the aging period under inves-
tigation,   two  maximum  strength values  were recorded for samples stored
in the  medium of pH 2;1.7,1.4, 1.  The  first one  occurs  between  the 1st
and the 7th day and is probably  connected with  channels  in  the  gel structure
 caused  among  others by syne re sis .  The  other occurs between the 7th and
the 90th  day was also covered by other aging tests.  The computed values
of relative changes  of the  Compressive  strength are presented  in Table 19
and in Figure 26 They prove  that  in the time interval under investigation,
destruction  of the polymer causing  a decrease  of  the  Compressive strength
                                  65

-------
      TABLE 19.  MEAN  UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE  STRENGTH  OF SAND  SAMPLES STABILIZED BY UF RESINS
                   STORED IN SOLUTIONS OF pH  2.8  -:- 0.05
      r
      L.

Hardener
Oxalic acid
Oxalic acid
Oxalic acid
Oxalic acid
Ammonium
chloride
4

pH
L
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.9
0.05
_

1
r
n
3.90.10
r*
7.46. 10
/?
6. 55. 10
8. 25. 10
6. 37. 106
J
Uniaxial
2
"
5.97.106
6. 49. 106
5.90. 106
6
8. 20. 10
s*
6.80. 10
.
compressive
Storage tii
4
r
6. 20. 106
7.11.106
g
6.88.10
/?
7.98. 10
6.93. 106
.
stren_gth V.N
Tie in days
7
/?
6.06. 10
g
6.85.10
7.02.106
7.75.106
7.36.106
/m J
14
.
r
7.94.106
6. 79. 106
5. 71. 106
8.05. 106
£»
6. 30.10

30
L J
8.30.106
7.09. 106
6. 20. 106
7.53.106
6. 26. 106
U

90
8.95. 106
5.91. 106
5.56.106
6
6.14.10°
5. 16. 106
L
Relative
change of
strength
r
1. 00
0. 83
0.79
0.77
0, 73
CT3

-------
   xi
   to
   d
CO   0]
(1)
tut)  0
a   >
x!
o

a)
fc>
CO
CO
(U
(H
a

6
o
o

0)
x!
   «H
    O
        1.0
     0.9.
     0.8
        0.7
        0.6
\
               2.2        1.6   1.6   1.4   1.2        0.6   0.6   Q4   0.2
                                                 pH of medium
    Fig.  26.  Relative changes  of the  compressive  strength

              of  soil  samples stabilized by  SP-modified UF resin

              stored in water solutions of muriatic  acid of

              various pH.
                                  67

-------
 of stabilized soils begins at pH 2. Within the interval 0. 05  pH   2  a con-
 tinuous decrease  of relative strength changes are recorded which  prove
 advancing destruction,  diminishing along with the  decreasing pH values.

 Hydrolysis  of  hardened resin catalyzed by  salts and undissociated  acids

 The rate  of the UF reaction is, apart  from hydronium ions, catalyzed by
 certain salts  phosphates  and acetates   and undissociated  acids. ^

 Salts and acids selected for  testing were: chlorides,  nitrates,  phosphates,
 sulphates and  oxalic  acid,  since  they  are  frequent components of grouting
 solutions  as hardeners.
 Samples were  prepared  of sand stabilized  by resins  at pH 2 in the amount of
 1  m solution of acids or their sodium salts.  Due to oxalic  acid limited solu-
 bility, a 0. 33  percent  solution was used. Stabilization was carried  out by
 about 30  percent  solutions  of resin of  the  molar  ratio F:U:SP =  2.5:1:0.00358
 (Table 5J in which urea was afterwards dissolved to  obtain the molar ratio
 F:U=2. 1:1.  The composition of  solutions is given in  Table  20. After  the  sam-
 ples were taken out of  molds they were stored in a  1 molar water  solution of
 the acid in  question or its  sodium salt.  The  solutions were acidified by HC1
 to  pH2 except for the oxalic sample.  The compressive  strength tests were
 carried out after 14, 30, 90 and 230 days.  Results are presented in  Table 20
 showing concentrated solutions of salts and the  tested acids bring about only
 slught drops of the  compressive strength of the stabilized  soil. The compu-
 ted coefficients of relative changs of strength occurring during the 230  day
 aging time are small and amount to  1-0.9. A continuous  increase of strength
 is recorded only  in the  case of hardening  by diluted oxalic acid. Strength
 changes were  due to hydrolysis of the polymer  and the catalytic action of
 phosphate and  acetic acid. Drops  of  strength of the  tested  sanlples are
 caused by changes of the gel structure  due  to high concentrations of electo-
 lytes.  On the  othe hand samples stabilized by resins containing NaHSO
 NaIi2PO4  and  CHsCOOH are characterized by lower  strengths as compared
 with those containing NaCl,NaNO3, HCOOH and  (COOH)2.   This  is  probably
 due to the lower solubility of resin in  these electrolytes. Based  upon these
 test results,  introducion  of physphates, solphates  and acetates to  the  UF  resin
 solutions  stabilizing soils is not desireable.
 Diffusion of hydrolytic  products

 Removal of products of the UF hardened resin hydrolysis may check changes
 in stabilized soils. The products consist  of formaldehyde, urea and lowmole-
 cukar-weighe  products of the UF  reaction  soluble on water. Their  removal
 from the medium  takes place as  a result of diffusion described by the Fick
 aquation:                                                              	
                             dc
                dn  = - DF  —	 dt                              (5)
                             dx                                    v '

where: n = number of moles transferred by diffusion  in the  time dt in the

                                  68

-------
TABLE 20.  MEAN  UNIAXIAL  COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF  SAND SAMPLES STABILIZED BY UF RESIN
             STORED  IN SOLUTIONS OF  ACIDS  AND THIER  SODIUM SALTS
Composition of stabilizing
solztlon
.
Resin - 100 p. o. v. NaCl - 50 p. o. v.
HC1 cone, to pH 2
Resin - 100 p. o. v. , 3m NaNOg - 50 p. o. v.
HC1 cone, to pH 2
r~ i
Resin - 100 p. o. v. , 3m NaH PO - 50 p. o. v. ,
HC1 cone, to pH 2
-- - -
Resin - 100 p. o. v. , 3 m HCOOH - 50 p. o. v. ,
50% NaOH to pH2
.
Resin - 100 p. o. v. , 3m CH COOH - 50 p. o. v. ,
HC1 cone, to pH 2
r i
Resin « 100 p. o. v. , water - 50 p. o. v. ,
(COOHJ2 - 0.33% pH 2
i 	
r
Resin - 100 p. o. v. , 3m NaHSO - 50 p. o. v. ,
30% NaOH to pH 2
L_
Compressive strength (N/m j _j Relative !
14 days
6.99.106
7. 66. 106
r ~i
s*
5. 46.10
••
7.75.106
J
£»
5. 35. 10
1
7.70.106
_j
2.08. 106
.
Storge t
30 days
-\
6
6. 63.10
7.36. 106
1
4. 60. 206
6
7.37.10
J
£?
4.76.10
1
£?
8.55.10
2.20.106
.
ime
90 days 230 days
, 4.
r ^
fi fj
6.21.10 6.70.10
L _
T
8.30.106 7.81.106
!
+
c c
5.51.10 5.50.10
_1_
"
7.27.106
.
5.71. 106
r ^
8. 65. 106
2.03.106
L
/?
7.08.10
.
6
5.11.10
h 	
9.92. 1-.
.
change of
strength
i
0.95
0.94
.' 1.00
0.92
0.90
r
1.00
1
t - - . - . -
£?
2.01.10 0.92

-------
         10
20     30      ^0      50      60      70      80      90
                                            strage time (_daysj
Fig. 27. The compressive  strength of soil sample"  • '< >i'ili-
         zed by UF resin stored in water (ij  and in  water
         solutions of formaldehyde of pH  1. 7  and concentra-
         tion 2% (2)  ,  4%   (3) ,   and 6%  (¥) .
                            70

-------
                                                              dc
direction x through  the section F;D = coefficient  of diffusion;  —  =  gradient
of the molar  concentration.
To find the degree to which diffusion of formaldehyde influences the rate  of
the aging changes caused by hydrolysis,  the  strength changes  were tested in
soil samples  stabilized by UF  resin stored in formaldehyde solutions  at  p'H
1.7 and concentration of 2,  4   and 6 percent and in water of  pH 1.7.  The
free formaldehyde concentration in samples was estimated  at 1*7  percent to
2.3 percent.  Diffusion  of this  compound from  the  sample to the surrounding
medium disappears  in  the case of samples  stored  in a 2  percent solution of
formaldehyde  due to the lack of concentration  gradient.

Samples were prepared of sand stabilized by  a 30 percent resin solution  of
the  molar ratio F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.003.  The resin was hardened by  oxalic acid
at pH 1.7,  The compressive strengt of samples stored under  these conditions
was tested  after  7,14,30 and 90 days. The  results are shown in Figure  27.
Relative strength changes computed  on these amount to:
Formaldehyde concentration
in the medium (%_)
0
2
4
6
Relative change of strength
0.72
0.97
0. 63
0.72
i 	 __„ 	 „ 	 „_ - 	
As  only slight changes of strength were noted on samples stored in the 2
percent solution of formaldehyde, it is concluded  removal of free  formaldehy-
de by means of diffusion accelerates the aging processes in soils stabilized
by UF resins.

Occurence of  microcracks in  the polymer gel structure

In the  course  of  hardening of  the UF resin water solution there occurs
syneresis which results  in a decrease  of the polymer gel cubic capacity.
Chuvelev3°  has found that the  syneresis effect in capillaries is limited and
diminishes along with a decrease of the capillary diameter.
Along with the decrease of the soil  grain size and corresponding  capillaries
smong the soil grains,  the number  of miccracks  in the gel structure due  to
stresses caused by synersis will diminish as  well.  Thus diffusion of forma-
ledhyde will be hindered and the compressive  strength changes in the  stabi-
lized  soil will slow down.

To  confirm  this hypothesis  a  number of samples were  prepared of three
kinds  of sans  of  various  size grain: I - 0.12  to  0.3 mm; II - 0.3  to 0.43
mm; III - 0,43 to  0.6 mm. Sand samples were  stabilized by  a 30 percent
                                  71

-------
     6.4-10'
1 -- J
 A
 ft
 fl
 0)
 k
 •H
 tn
 CQ
 ra
 0)
 f-i
 DH

 §
 o
                                                   60      70      80      90

                                                   storage time  ( days)
      Fig.  28.  Changes of the compressive  strength of soil  samples
                of various size grain stabilized  by UF resin in  the
                course of storage  in  water of the pH 1. 7 (l-fraction
                0. 12 - 0. 30  mm,  2 - fraction 0. 30 -  0. 43 mm,
                3-fraction  0. 43 -  0. 60  mm).
                                   72

-------
resin solution of the molar ratio  F:U:SP = 2.1:1:0.003  (after  dissolution of
additional urea) hardened  by oxalic  acid  at pH 1.7.  Samples were stored  in
water at pH  1.7  for  1,  14,  30  and 90 days. The results are shown in Figu-
re 28. Relative strength changes  computed on  these  grounds aomunt to:
           Kind of sand
Coefficient  of relative
strength changes
       0. 12 - 0. 3 mm
       0.3  -0. 43 mm
       0. 43 - 0. 6 mm
                 0, 96
                 0.92
                 0. 8?
Results indicate that the aging processes slow down along  with the increase
of small-grained fraction in the stabilized soil. Thus  the  hypothesis of the
soil size grain on the course  of the  stabilizing UF resin destruction seems
confirmed.

AGING PROCESSES IN SOILS STABILIZED  BY UF RESINS UNDER FIELD
CONDITIONS

Soils  stabilized by grouting under field  conditions have  no  homogeneous  pro-
perties.  The soil  strength changes along with the distance  from the axis of
the "rock-like" block.  '    However, there have been no comprehensive
investigations in this respect,  aimed at determination of  the  resin structure.
The aging processes under  these  conditions  are not  well known either. The
following tests were  carried out  for samples  stabilized under field conditions
after  a year' s  ageing:
       Uniaxial compressive   strength  test.
       Determination of the coefficient  of  permeability.
       Estimation  of proportion of organic matter.
       Chemical analysis of the polymer.
       Estimation  of the free formaldehyde concentration.
       Estimation  of the hydronium ion concentration.

The soil stabilization tests  were carriedx out  on  the field  of  IMGW in Rynia
of Zalew Zegrzyhski.  The  treated area was situated below the underground
water  surface  within the range of influence  of the reservoir.  This provided
for a continuous contact of stabilized blocks with underground waters.  The
treated soil consisted of close-grained  sand with predominance of quartz of
the following size  grain composition:
1------ 	 — ______
iSize of fraction
i
" in mm
i Share of fraction
"in sample in %
up to
0.6
1
0.
0.
4
6-
43

0.
0.
5
43-
3

0, 3-
0. 25
12
0. 25
-0.2
50
0. 2-
0. 12
23
0.
0.
3,
12-
06
5
	 i
0.06
1.5
i
                                  73

-------
Grouting was  carried out with a resin of  the molar ratio of F:U:SP -
2.5:0:0.00358  obtained on the  technical scale  second batch  .  Properties of
this  resin are shown in Table 6. It was  hardened  by a  15 percent  solution
of ammonium  chloride with additional urea added in the amount of 10. 2 kg
per 100 1 of the  ammonium chloride solution. The grout was prepared  by
mixing 100 liters of resin with 50 liters of hardener. The scheme of the  block
distribition  created  as a result   of  grouting is presented in Figure  102. After
a year' s  aging,  samples were taken form  the  block marked T-18   at various
distances  from its axis. Samples had  the diameter of 4.9 cm and  hieght  of
15 to 30 cm   Figure  29 Directly after taking, the samples were  put into her-
metic boxes having  100 percent  humidity.

The uniaxial compressive strength tests  were carried  ouf on samples  of the
diameter  of 4.9  cm  and height  of 4.9 cm. These tests revealed the strength
of the stabilized soil slightly  diminishes from  4. 25-106 N/m2 .to 60'106
N/m2 with the increasing distance from the axis of the stock (^Figure 30J, The
strength changes corresponds with results  obtained  by  other scientists.  Com-
paring the obtained  results with  estimation of the proportion  of  organic mat-
ter in samples,  indicates the particularly  low  value for the outer  sample
 3,60»10   N/m2  is  probably due to a lower polymer content.

Measurements of the coefficient  of permeability were  carried out on samples
drawing, a diameter  of 4.9 cm and height of 4.9 cm. The  obtained  result (Fi-
gure  30J shows the  coefficients  of permeability have a  constant  value which
oscillates around 4. lO~6m/s.  The coefficients   of permeability in  the stabi-
lized  soil block do not  depend  on the  place  from which the  sample  was  taken.

Concentration  of resin in the  grout  has  a decisive impact on the strength
properties and the coefficient  of  filtration of the soil samples stabilized by
UF resins.  In order to determine  the grout dilution effect,  the proportion of
organic matter  in the  stabilized soil samples was estimated. This  estima-
tion was based on an analysis of ash  remaining after combustion of samples.
The samples were dried and ground to obtain  a uniform powder of the grain
size 0.06  mm.

Results are  shown in   Figure  30  .  Concentration of resin in the grout is
practically constant from the  center to a distance  outwardly  of  approximate
2/3 of the radius of the block. A serious decrease of proportion of resin
content due  to dilution of the  grout  occurs in the sample taken 4 cm  from
the edge of the  block.  This effect probably has a certain impact on the re-
sults  of the   strength  teste.  The marked organic matter originate  from  the
hardened  resin  filling  the soil fissure.  However as the tested samples were
taken  in the course  of field investigation,  contamination with  other organic
compounds,  cannot be  excluded. Overestimation  of  individual results was
probably due to  such  inclusions.
                                  74

-------
                                                          9  cm

                                                         14 cm

                                                         19 cm

                                                         21 cm

                                                         26 cm
Fig.  29.    Diagram showing sites from   which samples were  taken
            out of the soil block stabilized by means  of grouting
            under field conditions.
                               75

-------
  18


  16
cu
+->
•fj
rt
a
o
  10
         2


         n
CO

JN.
tn
So-
2
•
N* m

*»
strength

03
"01
compressive

Co
o
                            10        15        20        25        30

                                 distance from the block  axis  (_cm)
    Fig.  30.    Changes of the  compressive  strength  (l)  and the

                coefficient  of permeability kw (3)  and the organic

                matter' content  (2) as  a function of the distance

                from  the  axis of  the  stabilized  soil  block.
                             76

-------
Examination of UF resins based on the elementary analysis of the sepa-
rated  polymer  should provide for determination of ageing changes before
the  influence the  strength  properties  and permeability of the soil stabili-
zed by them. No investigations have  been reported on this aspect.

Studies of the hardened UF resin stabilizing the soil samples was carried
out  after separation of the polymer.  Results of the elementary  analysis  are
shown in Table 21. The quantities characterizing the polymer were the molar
ratio  F:U and  the coefficients KI  and K2 (Figure 3l). The results shown in
Figure 31 indicate that   the polymer  structure  changes along with the gro-
wing distance  from the block axis.  This  is probably  due  to  diffusion of for-
maldehyde  by  underground waters which  seems confirmed by a decrease of
the  molar ratio F:U from  1.61  to   1.48.  Along with  the  decrease of the
molar  ratio F:U, the  number of  methylol groups drops  and results in an
increase of the K2 coefficient from 1.38  to 2.17.  Despite the acid  medium,
no substantial  changes  of the number of  methylene groups were found in
the  polymer under the  conditions  of investigation.  Dispersion of results is
higher here than  in the course  of laboratory tests.  This  is probably con-
nected with sporadic organic pollution of  soil  in the  course  of field
investigation.

Previous tests indicated that the rate  of diffusion  of  free  formaldehyde
from  the soil  stabilized by UF  resins to  underground waters frequently
determines the rate of the aging processes.  To  find the  changes o f the for-
maldehyde  concentration in the  treated soil block exposed  to the underground
water action under natural  conditions, determination of formaldehyde was
made  on solutions extracted of selected soil samples. Formaldehyde was
determined by  a  colorimetric method. The results of the  free  formaldehyde
concentration in  the sample was estimated,  assuming that:  fa)  water was
entirely  separated from the polymer  due to syneresis.

TABLE 21. MEAN RESULTS OF ELEMENTARY ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES
            OF RESIN STABILIZING  SOILS AND THE VALUES:  F:U, Kx
            AND K2 COMPUTED ON  THESE GROUNDS
Symbol
ofsample
1
2
3
4
5
i 	

%N
	 1
26.81
28. 09
28. 23
27.93
27.15

" ~
%C
r 	 1
30.00
31.01
31.05
30.51
23.57


%H
	
5.22
4.99
5.15
5.13
3.88


F:U
1.61
1.57
1.57
1.54
1.48


Kl
r- 	 - - - H
1.11
0,91
0.97
1. 00
0. 96


K2
1.38
2.03
1.78
1.75
2.17

This is,  of course, a simplified scheme  whit seems sufficient to  compare
individual measuremenst.  Free  formaldehyde  content  in  the  sample  was
estimated according to formula:
                                 77

-------
 2.6,



 2.2

 2.0

 1.8

 1.6

 1.4

 1.2

 1.0
 1.5

 1.4.

 13.

 1.2.

 1.1

'1.0.

 0.9

 0.8

 0.7.
                           10         15        20        25        30
                                   distance from the  block axis (cm)
Fig. 31.  Changes of the  structure  of the hardened UF resin
          as a  function  of  the  distance from the axis of the  sta-
          bilized soil block
          1.  molar ratio U:F
          2.  KI coefficient characterizing the-cross-linkage
             rate of the  polymer
         ' 3.  K2 coefficient characterizing the  number of
             methylol  groups in the polymer.
                               78

-------
                      C
               c.
                       FE'
                       m
                             W
where:

CF
C
  FE
m
W
estimated free formaldehyde concentration  in the sample,

determined free formaldehyde concentration in  the  extract,

nass of extracted sample,

per cent of water in the  sample.
The free formaldehyde  concentrations  computed  by this equation are  shown
in Table 22 and Figure 32.  The mean water content in  the  samples was
estimated as 12.1  percent. These results indicate  that the  free formaldehyde
concentration  changes considerable with distance from  the block axis, 1,54
percent to 0. 13  percent/.

Data showed a relatively rapid diffusion of formaldehyde to underground
waters. Despite a decrease  of formaldehyde concentration in the block and
the changes in the polymer structure involved, no  influence  of hydrolysis
on the soil  strength and water permeability has  been recorded.

TABLE 22. ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION OF  FREE FORMALDEHYDE
            AND pH IN SOIL  SAMPLES STABILIZED UNDER FIELD
            CONDITIONS
Symbol
of sample
(Fig. 29)
1
2
3
4
5
I
Sample
weight
g
153
187
158
140
101
	 	
F concen-
tration in
the extract
%
__ -_. 	 _ 	
0.143
0. 123
1.230
0.098
0.0081
Estimated
F concen-
tration in
sample %
i 	
1.54
1.09
1.28
1. 16
0. 13
pli of the
extract
2, 3
2,5
2.4
2.7
4. 4
Estima-
ted pH in
the sample
1, 55
1.75
1. 60
1.90
3.20
Acids catalyze hardening of UF resins. On the  other  hand,  a high concen-
tration of hydronium  ions  is  one of the major factors  causing secondary
hydrolysis of the hardened resin.  Acids in  excess then become  undesirable
agents.  To determine changes  of the hydronim ion concentration in soils
stabilized by  UF resins exposed to underground water  action under  natural
conditions, pH measurements were carried  out in solutions obtained after
extraction of  the  taken samples. The measurements were made by an A-7
                                 79

-------
2.8

2.6

M.

2.2.

2.0.

(.8.

V6.

1.4.

1.2

4.0.
  2.
a,
  3.
                          10         15        20        25   ,   .30
                           distance-from the block axis   vcrn)
 Fig. 32.     Changes in the  formaldehyde concentration  (l),
              pH   (2j  and  the  K-2 coefficient  characterizing
              the  number of methylol  groups  in  the  polymer  (3j .
                               80

-------
pH-meter. Estimates of the hydronium in the samples was based  on simi-
lar assumptions  made  for  free formaldehyde. The  empiric relationship
between the solution concentration and its pH was while determining the
pH  of the  sample.  Results  and pH of  the   tested  samples are shown in
Table 22 and Figure 32. They indicate that the hydronium ion concentra-
tion  diminishes along with  the growing distance from the block axis.  The
pH values increase  from 1.55 to 3.18. The increase of pH above  3 in the
outer part of the block seems  favorable,  as  the  published  long-term obser-
vations  results indicate high values  of pH do  not cause  noticeable changes
the stabilized soil strength. Therefore,  it is thought  that diffusion  of hydro
nium ions will  lead to an increase of pH  in  the block below the critical
minimum  before  the polymer  hydrolysis  deteriorates desirable  properties
of the  stabilized  soil.
                               81

-------
                           SECTION  IX
                          BASIC GROUTS
SYNTHESIS OF WATER SOLUBLE ACETONE-FORMALDEHYDE RESINS

Use of UF  grouts in basic soil is difficult..  and sometimes  impossible.
Experiments to find  suitable substitutes have been undertaken. Acetone-
formaldehyde  (AF)  resins were chosen for  this investigation.  They are
synthesized from cheap, easily available  raw  materials and characterized
by good solubility in  water  and have the capacity for hardening in an alkaline
environment.

Results of the  investigations of the grout based on AF resins were  compa-
red with the data obtained  from the typical low-viscosity basic grout descri-
bed by the  Soviet patent No.  248549.  There is nothing new about the  high
molecular product resulting from  the alkaline condensation between  acetone
(A) and formaldehyde (_Fj.  Nevertheless, individual authors  obtaining  AF
resins for different  purposes  plasticiezer,  laminating  resins,  fabric finis-
hings  often represent  opposite opinions as far as  the required  synthesis  con-
ditions are concerned.  Comparatively  detailed receipt  for AF resin synthesis,
aimed at surface  stabilization of soil, is given by A.  Falkiewicz,    but the
resin  obtained has too large a viscosity and limited solubility in water for
satisfactory application to  grouting. The initial  investigations series of AF
resin  synthesis was  made  on the  basis of Falkiewicz' s receipt and different
conditions for A  and F condensation were introduced (^temperature, pli, time
of duration and F/A  molar  ratio).  Sodium hydroxide,  in  the form of 10  per-
cent water  solution, was  used as a catalyser.  An optimum AF resin f from
the points view  of grouting soil stabilization") was obtained when the  con-
densation was carreid out  for  4  hours,  at a temp, of  318 +5 K,  at pH ran-
ge 10  to 11, with the molar ratio F:A   3. After the condensation was neutra-
lized,  post-reaction mixture was subjected to  vacuum  distillation in order to
remove  acetone,  low volatile byproducts and  water which was not reacted.
Distillation was  continued  until the resin reached a viscosity of about 30cP
(at 293°K),

Table  23  and Figure 33 and 34 illustrate the  influence of F/A  molar  ratio
on the gelling  time of AF  resins and physical and mechanical properties of
sandy  soil which were  stabilized by those resins.

Twenty percent  sodium hydroxide  solution was used as a hardener  for the
samples numbered through 1-3 and thirty percent  NaOH solution was  utili-


                                  82

-------
TABLE 23. THE  INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS  MOLAR RATIOS  F/A ON THE CHANGES  OF AF RESIN
            GELLING TIMES




No.


'


1
i 	 -I

2 .
i— H
3


4



«~

5


Conditions of AF resin synthesis Properties of AF resin


Molar
ratio
F/A





^1.5:1


2:1
1 	
3:1


4:1



'

5:1




Temp.



°K
*"~





318+5°
**










1 L „,-«„.

r
i
pH



i -



time


'
v>
H


1


1
10-i-ll











4











r~ 1

Catalyse r


'

r ^



10%

10% NaOH













Density
at 29 3 OK

_1
3
g/cm j

1. 142


1.156

1. 176


1.183


L


1. 189


„ „„ „ „-„„,„„*****, &~~~-,~m-*~~-L~~m~ 	 „_„„_.
I
Visco-
sity
at
293°K

j

L CP
1
29,2


32,6

33,1


32,5





33, 1



Gelling
time at 30%
NaOH in
quantity
1, 5 part, of
vilume .
(293°K)

min.

9


15
r
140

does not
gell. 30% NaOH
-15 part of
volume
l_

does not
gell 30% NaOH
15 part of
volume


-------
    0)
    0)
    •H
    en
    S
    o
    o
         10
                             10        ,         20                 30
           Period of  the  sample  storage  under water  (_daysj


Fig. 33.  Uniaxial compressive strength  of the soil samples
          stabilized with AF resins obtained at different F/A
          molar  ratio
                                                       K/m-s1/
                             10                  20                 30
           Period of the sample storage  under water   f daysj

Fig.  34.  Coefficient of permeability  k  for the soil samples stabilized
          with AF resins  obtained  at  different  F/A molar ratio.

                                  84

-------
                 35       40       45        50
          Content of the dry substance  (weight  %j

Fig.  35. Dependence between  the  density and the content of  dry
         substance  for AF-3P resin  (hatched area the range  of
         grouting AF resins")
      150
      100
    U)
    o
    0 50
    CD 3U J
                                     293'K
                 35       4Q        45        50       55
          Content of the dry substance  (weight  %")

Fig.  36. Dependence between viscosity  and the  content of dry
         substance  for  AF - 3P  resin  (hatched area - the range
         of grouting AF resins).
                              85

-------
zed for samples  4 and 5 resins. Investigations  of  the  properties  of  the
stabilized soil samples were carried out after 1, 4,  14 and  28  days  stora-
ge under water, at  room  temperature.  Characteristics  of  the  stabilized
sandy soil  were determined in a manner similar to that discussed in sec-
tion X.

Investigations on the synthesis of AF resins  on  a semitechnical scale (^reac-
tor 0,25 m^)was made by use of previously chosen optimum conditions.
After the condensation, the neutralized post-reaction mixture was conden-
sed to  a viscosity of about 140 cP  at 293 K to  remove undesirable low
molecular  by-products.  This improved the  viscosity properties of the AF
resins.  The resin (jmarked by AF - 3P Symbol J can be freely diluted with
water and the chemical  grout of required viscosity is achieved when the
synthesis was carried out on a  large  scale  and  with use  of technical  raw
materials,  it had no negative influence  on the course  of the process. Exo-
thermic  reactions  can be  controlled by  stopping steam delivery to  the
reactor when the temperature of 308 K is achieved. After an increase  of
temperature  to 315  K, water cooling begins with temperature  kept to the
required range  i.e. 318+5 K. AF-3P resin  indicates considerable stability
having no essential  change in its physical and chemical properties after
9 months storage  in an unheated store-house.

PROPERTIES OF WATER SOLUBLE AF RESIN STABILIZED SOIL

AF-3P  resin stabilized soils were investigated  for  compressive  strenhth
and permeability. Section X includes  the characteristics and the  way the
samples were prepared  and determinations accomplished.  Figure 35 and
36 illustrate  dependence  of AF resin viscosity  on the  content of dry  sub-
stance  in it.  The content of dry substance  in AF resin also decisively
influenced  the physical and mechanical  properties  of  the soil stabilized by
this  resin  ^Figure . 37 J,  Twenty- five percent sodium  hydroxide  solution
(^293 K-l. 27g/cm^ Jwas  used as the hardener in the quantity  of  20 part  by
volume.  The  sample was  removed  after  storage for 14 days  under  water
at room temperature and  uniaxial compression of stabilized soil was
conducted.

Assuming resins used for grouting in low permeable soil should not  have
a  viscosity larger  than  30 to 35 cP (at 293°K) and  resins diluted  below
35 percent  provides for  weak strengthening and soil sealing,  the  ranges
adequate for  grouting AF resins, were determined in  the above mentioned
figures.

The  low-viscosity  grouting resins,   AF-3J   prepared for  these investiga-
tions have  the  following  properties:
                                         -clear, with beige tone
density  at 293°K                        -I.l46g/cm3
                              86

-------
                 35        40        45        50
         The content of dry substance  (weight %J
55
Fig.  37.   The  influence of AF-3P resin dilution on the  strength
          of sandy soil  stabilized with it ^hatched area  - the range
          of grouting AF  resins) .
                             87

-------
   CJ
   (fl
   o
   o
   en
       100
                  1         2        3
                       Time (^hourj
Fig.  38, The course of viscosity changes of AF grout hardened
        with different quantities of  25% NaOH solution
        1-10 part  of volume  of the hardener
        2-15 part  of volume  of the hardener
        3-20 part  of volume  of the hardener
        4-25 part  of volume  of the hardener
        5-30 part  of volume  of the hardener
                            88

-------
                                             10        12
                                              Time  (_hour)
Fig.  39. The course of viscosity  changes of AF  grout hardened with
        25% NaOH solution (25 part  of hardener  volume per 100 part
        of AF - 3J resin volume) at lower temperatures.
                  ^       o
                      0,2 K
295,5  ±
290, 5° +  0,2°K
1 -
2 -
3 - 285, 5° +  0, 2°K
4 - 280, 5° +  0, 2°K
                             89

-------
     30.
  CO
  SH

  O
  X!
  0)
  s
  bfl
  C
  CD

  O
                    265           295           305
                             Temperature   (Kj
Fig.  40.  Dependence of AF grout gelling time
          (AF - 31 resin hardened with 25%  NaOH
                                                   N
          solution in quantity of 25 part of volume)
          on the  temperature .
                         90

-------
   Z5-IO*,
 X!
 to
     2.0.
 (D

 
-------
viscosity  at 293°K                      -11.1 cP
pH                                       -6.3
the  content of dry substance              -36. 1 percent
water  solubility                          -total
content of free CHLO                     -3.12 percent
Temp, of ignition according
to Marcussonx                           -375 K

xTemperature of ignition was marked on Marcusson apparatus, type OB-306/
5511/01,  made in  Hungary,  in  agreement  with  PN-65/C-04008.

Hardening is influenced by various basic  substances  such as sodium hydro-
xide,  potassium hydroxide,  sodium carbonate,  twenty-five percent ammonia,
guanidine carbonate, milk of lime, and thriethanolamine.  These were inves-
tigated for  AF-3J.  It was concluded that gelling of the grout took place only
under the influence of hydroxide  of alkaling metal., and a pH of grouting
composition lower  than 10.  Figure 38  and  39  illustrate  the course  of chan-
ges of AF  grout  viscosity hardend with twenty-five percent  NaOH solution
in the quantity from 10  to 30 part of volume.  By controlling  the hardened
sample at the required temperature, determinations were made  on a  Rheotest
2 rotative viscometer produced in Eats Germany.  Gelling times  of grouting
composition were also determined. The composition consisted of  20  ml of
AF-3J resins and 5 ml of  25  percent sodium-hydroxide. Solutions were
tested at the following temperatures:  280.5°+ 0. 2°K;  285.5+0.2°K; 290.5°+
0. 2°K; 295.5°+ 0, 2°K;  or 300.5°  + 0. 2°K  (Figure  4o).

Velocity of  the hardening process  of AF grout depends on the hardener  tem-
pera^ure  and the  rate  of dilution  of AF resin.  The results  (Figure  38_)
shows- the hardening process is accelerated by an increase  of  the quantity
of 25  percent  NaOH solution from twenty  (20) to  twenty-five (25j parts by
volume. On the other  hand,  caution must be exercised because the retarda-
tive effect  of  resin dilution  predominates  at  30 part  of the  hardener by vo-
lume. Temperature has an important influence on  the  gelling time of AF
grout. The gelling  time of AF-3J resin hardened with 25 percent NaOH solu-
tion using 25  part by volume required  90  minutes at temperature of 300. S0!^
and to 405  minutes at a temperature of 290 5 K.   Accelerating the process of
hardening of AF  grout by an addition of larger quantities  of  NaOH water so-
lution, effecting resin  dilution  and reducing  mechanical strength of the stabi-
lized  soil (Figure  41 _) results  in no essential changes of the coefficient of
permeability,  (l, 10~ m/s).

Soil stabilized by AF  grout  resistance  to the  aging processes was determined
by testing the grouts  mechanical  and  filtration properties after 1, 7,  14,  30,
45 and 90 days storage under  water, at room temperature .  Twenty-five per-
cent sodium hydroxide  solution in the quantity of 15 part by  volume was used
as a hardener for  the  resin  stabilized  soil.  Figure  42 illustrates the influ-
ence of the  aging  process on the  uniaxial compressive strength of the  sam-

                                 92

-------
tuo
O
     T
                                                  K/m.s /
           10      20      30      40      50      60     70     60     90

          Period  of  the  semple storage underwater  (days)
Fig.  43.  The influence of egeing  period on the  coefficient of
          permeability kw of the  soil samples stabilized with AF
          grout.
                             93

-------
pies  of stabilized  soil. The initial increase of the strength is  caused by
the soilpolymer' s second hardening.  Maximum strength occurs after  35
days  of  aging.  Compressive strength amounts to about 2. 6. 10°  N/m  at that
time. After 90 days  of storage in water, the Compressive strength decreases
to 2.2'10^N/m2.  Figure 43 illustrates changes of coefficient of permeauili-
ty (kw)  during the storage of the stabilized soil samples. Coefficient of
permeability is  1. !• 10"8in« s"1  after 7 days and decreases  to  a  minimum
value of (kw)  7. 0- 10~9m» s"1  after 30  days of aging.  In the course  of furt-
her aging,  permeability is  1, 4- 10~8m* s     after  90 days.

PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF LOW-VISCOSITY
PHENOLIC-FORMALDEHYDE  STABILIZED  SOIL

Phenolic-formaldehyde  (FF) grouts are  often used in  preparation for soil
stabilization.  Because  some of them  harden in alkali  environment, they
can be applied to the  soils containing carbonates  and clay molecules.  Li-
terature does  not provide us with the specific-data  concerning the properties
of the  soil stabilized with low viscosity basic FF grouts, and therefore,
limited investigations were  included  as a portion of this study.  The results
enable  the  rough estimation of both types  of basic  grouts.

The  grout  described  in  the Soviet patent  No. 248549 was  chosen for the
investigations. Components of the grouting composition were  selected   to
obtain  a gelling time  at room  temperature,  without thermostating,  of appro-
ximately 2 hours. (Table 24j.
TABLE 24.   COMPOSITION OF FF GROUT
     Compositon  of FF grout
 Formalin solution
      "A"
       30%
 NaOII solution
Gelling time at
room temperature
 without
thermostating
 part  by weight
part by volume/100
parts by volume of A
solution
 phenol          - 1
 resorcinal      - 1
 37%  formalin   - 5
 ethylene   glycol-0,25
       2,25
      115  min
Figure 44 illustrates the  changes occuring in viscosity of FF grouts.
Viscosity was determined by means  of Hopler1 s rheoviscometer. The  measure
ments were  taken  every 15 minutes,  starting the moment that 20 ml  of
                               94

-------
  700
  600
  500
  400
0,
o
5" 300
to
o
o
to
   zoo
   100
                                                                    ?2
                                             6             8


                                             Time (hours)
10
     Fig. 44. The course of viscosity changes of FF grout at

             temperature


             1 -  295,5°  +   0,2°K


             2 -  290,5°  +   0,2°K
                                95

-------
to

v  2
>

w
to
0)
Si


6
o
U
                                   .X—'
           10      20     30     40     50     60     70     60      90


        Period of the sample  storage underwater  (^ 24 hoursj
Fig.  45.  The influence  of ageing  period on the mechanical  resistance

         of the soil  samples  stabilized  with FF   grout.
 fcuO

 O
                                                   K(rn-s')
           10      20     30     40     50     60     70     60     90


        Period  of the sample storage under water (_24 hour)



Fig. 46. The influence of ageing period on coefficient  of  permeabi-

         lity kw of the soil samples stabilized with  FF grout.
                             96

-------
formalin solution "A" was mixed with 0.45 ml of the hardener (30 percent
NaOH solution, having a gravity of 1.32 g per cubic centimeter  at  293 K) .
The samples of the hardened grout was maintained  at  constant tempera-
tures  of 295. 5°+ 0. 2°K and 290. 5°+ 0. 2°K.

This grouting  composition has  a  low initial  viscosity, (_6 to IcP) which
gradually increases till the moment prior to gelling.  Viscosity increases
rapidly  as gelling proceeds.  Strong  dependence of the gelling  time on
temperature is  observed similar to the AF  grouts  (about  5 hours at temp.
295.5°K and about 9.5  hr. at temperature  290, 5°K.)

The samples for the  investigations of physical and mechanical properties
of the soil stabilized by FF grout were prepared in the same way as for
the AF  grout.  Determinations  of uniaxial compressive strength and co-
efficient of permeability  kw were made after  1, 4, 1, 10,  21, 45 and  90
days storage of the samples under  water, at room  temperature.  The results
are given in Figure 45 and 46.

The soil stabilized with FF  grout achieved optimum properties after  45
days storage' under water.  Uniaxial compressive strength totaled  3. 64* 10"
N/m2  and  coefficient of filtration kw  = *•  6* lO'^m/s. After  90 days aging,
certain  worsening  of soilpolymer properties occurs.  It especially  concerns
its  permeability (^kw =  2. 6- 10   m/s). The general course of  changes of
physical and mechanical properties of the soil stabilized by FF  and AF
grouts are similar.
                              97

-------
                         SECTION  X

            METHODOLOGY  OF  INVESTIGATION

REAGENTS AND RAW  MATERIALS

Reagents used in laboratory investigation

The basic reagents used in laboratory investigation included:
-  pure  formalin of the concentration 37 percent F  stabilized by methanol
   according to the standard BN-68/6191-86,
   pure  urea  according to the standard  BN-65/6191-41,
   commercial sodium pyrosulphite according to the standard
   PN-67/C-84016,
-  pure  acetone according to  the  standard  BN-65/6191-51,
-  pure  resorcin according  to the standard BN-72/6193-34,
-  pure phenol according to the standard BN-65/6191-33,
-  pure  sodium hydroxide according to the standard BN-71/6191-07,
-  analytically pure muriatic acid 36 percent  according to the standard
   BN-70/6191-90,
-  pure  ammonium  chloride according to the  standard PN-64/C-80046,
-  pure  monobasic  ammonium phosphate according to the standard
   BN-64/6191-30,
-  pure  ethylene glycol according to the standard BN-72/6193-34,
-  pure  diethylene glycol according to  the  standards of Koch-Light
   Laboratories Ltd.,
-  pure  furfuryl alcohol according to  the standard ZN-67/CZSP/E-11, 226,
-  commercial  caprolactam according to the  standard ZN-64/MPCH-Sch-
   196,
-  pure  acryloamide  according to the standards of Fluka  AG, Buchs SG,
   pure  sodium chloride,
-  pure  sodium nitrate according to the  standard PN-64/C-80259,
-  pure  monobasic  sodium  phosphate according to the standard
   ZN-62/MPCH/N-975,
-  pure  acetic acid according to the standard  BN-69/6193-11,
-  pure  formic acid according to the standard ZN-69/MPCH/N-1507,
-  pure  hexamethylenetetraamine according to the standard  PN-55/C-80552,
-  commercial  triethylenetetraamine.

Apart from  the  specified reagents the  following compounds  were  used  in
analytical work in  the analytically pure  state:  disodium phosphate, sodium
hydroxide,  sodium sulphite,  mercuric  chloride, sodium  chloride,  sodium
                               98

-------
versenate,  iodine, sodium thiosulphate, indicator phenolphthalein, indicator
thymolphthalein,  indicator fuchsine.

Raw materials used in syntheses on a semi-technical and technical scale

-  commercial formalin of the concentration 36.5 to 37.5  percent stabilized
   by methanol according to the standard  PN-60/C-8800,
-  commercial urea according to the standard PN-62/C-88029,
-  sodium  pyrosulphite according to the standard PN-67/C-84016,
-  commercial acetone according to the standard PN-51/C-97001.

Apart from the  specified materials  small quantities of the following corn-
pounds were used: pure muriatic  acid and pure sodium hydroxide in  water
solutions of the concentration of 3 to 10 percent.

EQUIPMENT  FOR SYNTHESES

Equipment  used for UF and  AF  resin syntheses on the laboratory, semi-
technical and  technical scales

Reactions  on the laboratory scale were carried out  in quckfit  reactors of
the capacity from 0.5 to  5.0  1  furnisched with  a heating jacket, mixer,
dropping funnel, reflux condenser or distillation cooler and a  thermometer.
The mixer  seal and the distillation  set provided, if  necessary,  for  vacuum
reactions.

Reactions  on  the semi-technical scale were  carried  out in an  enamel reactor
of the capacity of 0. 25  cu  m furnished with a heating and cooling jacket
 steam  heating , mixer, dropping funnel,  heat exchanger; thermometers and
a  vacuum  distillation  set (Figure 47j.

Synthesis of UF  resins on the technical scale was accomplished by  the
Plasticicis   Company using the  equipment  presented  diagrammatically in
Figure 48.  Reactions were made in the three enamel autoclaves  of the
capacity of 5,  3 and 2 cu  m. at the  same  time and the resin discharged
simultaneously,  providing for a homogeneous batch  of resin of about 10 tons.

ANALYSES AND  MEASUREMENTS

Determination of  free formaldehyde in resins

Free  formaldehyde in the resins were determined by  means  of  the
sulphiteacidimetric method. 42 As a  result of  reaction of sodium sulphite
and free formaldehyde there occurs  the sodium salt  of hydroxymethanosul-
phonic acid and the  equivalent quantity of sodium hydroxide  which is then
titrated by  a standard acid solution.

                                 99

-------
o
o
                                                                       1. 2.  Weight measuring instruments
                                                                            for rad materials
                                                                       3.  Impeller pump for liquids
                                                                       4.  Pressure  autoclave
                                                                       5.  Cooler
                                                                       6.  Pressure  Vessel for distillate
                                                                       7.  Resin reservoir
       Fig. 47. Diagram  of the  semi-technical installation for AF and UF resin production

-------
                                                                                 11
      form alin
             sodium
           pyrosulphite
                 resin
1. Formalin reservoir
2. 3. Impeller pumps for  liquids
4. Formalin volume measuring in-
   strument
5. 6. Urea and  sodium pyrosulphate
     weight measuring instruments
7. Mixe r
8.9.10.  Autoclaves
11,12,13.  Coolers
Fig. 48. Diagram  of the installation for UF resin production

-------
Determination of  formaldehyde in the extract

Formaldehyde in  the extract was  determined by means of the  coloimetric
method worked out in  the IMGW.  43 Color reaction with formaldehyde was
due to  pure fuchsine.  In view of  a high sensitivity of the method testing
solutions were diluted 10-100  times. The determination error was less
than 1  percent.

Determination of  pH

Measurements of pH of  water  solutions  of resins  and extracts were carried
out by means  of a pH-meter or colorimetrically in relation to the  desired
error magnitude.  Laboratory  work was mainly  based on the 7A pH-meter
of the three measurement ranges:

I  - pli 5-9,  at  the accuracy of  + 0.05 pH,
II  - pH 0-8,  at  the accuracy of  + 0, 1  pH,
III- pH 6-14, at  the accuracy of  + 0.1  pH.

Semi-technical and technical syntheses were carried  out by means  of Bel-
gian UCB indicator papers  of the range 3.0-5.0,  4.8-6.8, 6.2-8.2, 7.5-9.5
pH,  providing for the  accuracy of + 0. 2 pH.
Determination of the  dry residue content resin concentration
                                                              30
There is no  standard  method  for determination  of dry  residue content in
UP and  AF  resins.  The basic method consists in drying.  The proportional
content  of dry residue  was determined on the ground of the  difference bet-
ween the mass of the  resin sample dried at 393  + 2  K and its  normal
weight   2 hours for the UF resin and 10 hours for the  AF resin  .
                                              30
Determination of  water and acetate   tolerance

Determination of  the tolerance was based on the  following method: A resin
sample  of 5  ml is poured into a 50 ml  beaker by means  of a pipette,
cooled to 293  + 1 K and  while being continuously mixed,  titrated up to the
moment  when black traces  disappear from the white surface  below the
beaker.  The  quantity of percipitant in ml is read from the burette.   The
tolerance is  expressed in ml  of  the used precipitant per  1  ml of resin.
The used precipitants  were: water (water tolerance) and a 30 percent
solution  of sodium  acetate (acetate  tolerance).

Elementary  analysis

The hardened resin samples for the proportional carbon ,  nitrogen,  hydro-
gen and  sulphur content tests were  prepared  by a thorough grinding in a
mortar  and  sixfold washing with distilled water in order  to  remove  all
                                 102

-------
the  components not connected with the polymer.   The samples were then
dried in vacuum at 308° + 2°K for 24 hours.  Before the measurements they
were stored in a decinator above  calcium chloride.  Elementary analyses
aimed at determination of the proportional content of  nitrogen,  corbon and
hydrogen and ash  were by means of the  PERKIN  ELMER 240  apparatus at
the  accuracy of i1  0. 3 percent.  The  sulphur  content was determined on the
grounds of burning the sample in the Sh'dniger  bottle.

Intra-red  spectrum

The infra-red spectra were worked out for  the washed  resin  samples which
were dried similarly  to  those of the elementary analysis. The testing sam-
ples were prepared by pressing of the  ground resin into  potassium bromide.
The spectra were  obtained on the UNICAM SP-200 apparatus.

STRENGTH  TESTS

Selection of methods

The uniaxial compressive  strength tests are the most  frequently used  met-
hod of  determination  of  mechanical properties  of stabilized soils.  This test
was adopted as a  criterion of the  strength properties  of the tested semples
for  this investigation. Uniaxial  compressive  strength measurements were
made with the ZD  10/90  tensile  testing machine (Made in the  GDR) having
the  following characteristics:  Accuracy of the  load measurement - i" 1 per-
cent, Shitt  rate regulated between  3, 5  and 35 mm/min,  Range of measure-
ments:  2.103, 4. 103, 1.104,  2« 104, 4'104,  1.10°N.  The strength tests
were carried out at the  shift rate of 35 mm/min.   The  results  were  based
on the mean value of three measurements.

Preparation of samples

The samples were prepared by  means  of  mixing sand  with  resin. The used
sand had well segregated and encircled grain, with some of the particles
being cracked  or surrounded with envelopes  of  hydrated ferrum  compounds.
The basic component of sand was quartz  (96 percent),  feldspar (2.9  per-
cent) and  heavy ends minerals  (l. 1 percent). The  sand size  grain is  shown
below:

FRACTION     0.8-  0.63-  0.40-    0.25-    0.16-    0.09-   0.06-   0.06

SIZE (mm)     1.0   0.8    0.63     0.40     0.25     0.16    0.09

FRACTION CON-
TENT IN SAMPLE
               0.50  0.42  15.10   55.00    23.38     3.25    0.32   0.32
                                103

-------
Fractions  of more than  0.8  mm  and  less than 0.06  were  removed while
preparing  the  samples.  In the case of stabilization by UF resins  the sand
prepared in this manner was washed by a 1 percent solution of HC1 and
then by water  in order to remove alkalic  compounds and ion exchangers.

DETERMINATION  OF  THE  COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY

The kw  coefficient of  permeability  is  calculated on the  relation between  the
Volume of the  penetrating water V within a unit time t  and the  surface  unit
F under the influence  of the hydraulic  gradients  I:

                                    v
                         w       F. 1. t

As the soil samples  stabilized  by polymers have a  rather low water permeabi-
lity,  the basic problems consist in;  a  precise fixing  of the sample  in  the
testing mechine  in order to avoid edge effects and measurements of small
flows.  Sealing of the sample walls was  obtained by means  of  a rubber me-
mbrane out of which the  pressure was  raised. The measurement apparatus
is shown diagrammatically  Figure  49.

Measurements were  based on samples prepared similarly to those for the
uniaxial compressive strength or taken form  soil blocks stabilized  by
means of field grouting. The  penetrating  water volume was measured witli
the  accuracy of  1" 0.01  cu cm by means of a measurement reservoir furin-
shed with a scale. Measurements presented in Chapter VI gave results
which were based on the  mean  values of measurements for three samples.
As the results repeated, further measurements were based on the mean
vaule of samples.

MEASUREMENTS  OF THE  ANGLE OF CONTRACT

Measurements of the angle  of contact were carried  out according to  the
method  described by Putilova^ on the grounds  of photographs of the air
pocket below the quartz  plate sunk in the  tested resin. This made it possible
to avoid the  hysteresis  of the  wetting capacity. Before  the  measurements
the  plate was throughly cleaned  and deg  reased  by extraction with carbon
tetrachloride.  In view  of a  considerable  dispersion of the  measured  values
of the  angle of  contact  within the range of i"  0.05  radian, the presented
results  are based  on the mean values of 10 measurements.

MICROSCOPE  TESTS,

Microscope  observations of the fracture surfaces  of the stabilized  soil
samples were  carried  out by means of the MSt-131 stereoscopic microscope
using magnification of  16.5-100  times  to  make  it  possible to keep the
necessary depth of field. Test of microsections  of the stabilized soil


                                 104

-------
                                               1.  Tested sample.
                                               2.  Upper reservoir  of water
                                                   which presses the membrane
                                                   down in the sample.
                                               3.  Mensuring  vessel.
                                               4.  Conduit joining the upper
                                                   reservoir  with the device
                                                   for fixing of samples,
                                               5.  Conduit joining the measu-
                                                  •ring vessel with the device
                                                   for fixing of samples.
                                               6.  Discharge  vessel.
                                               7.  Membranne which tightens
                                                   samples.
Fig.  40.  Diagram  of the instrument for measuring of the
         coefficient  of permeability of samples.
                              105

-------
samples were  carried  out by means of  the interference-polarization
MPI-5  microscope. Enlargements of 60-600 times were used. Tested
samples were  impregnated in a vacuum with  methyl methacrylate which
was then polymerized. This  provided for clean and untouched micro-
sections.
                             106

-------
                      SECTION  XI

       METHODS  FOR COMPUTATION OF  GROUT FLOW

INTRODUCTION

Equations predicting the range  and duration  of the injection of  grout being
introduced into the soil is presented  in three  sections. The injection  range
and duration depend on: coefficient of permeability, coefficient of soil effec-
tive porosity, filter diameter of the well pumping the grout,  liquid viscosity
and magnitude of the overpressure under whitch the liquid is  being intro-
duced into  the soil. Computations  cover the two essential  cases:  (l)  pum-
ping the  grout only, when  the  stabilized  soil assumes cylindrical  shape;and
 (2)  pumping the  grout with  displacement  by other liquid, for example,  by
water thus  obtaining  the cylindrical  shape with unstabilized soil inside.

The grout  flow,,can be considered  to act in one of three patterns:  (Aj  The
coefficient of the dynamic viscosity of  the  grout is  constant  during the
incjection ( p. = constant for 0
-------
covered by the grout is inversely proportional to the dynamical viscosity
of the grout.
where:
          k (t) - coefficient of permeability for the grout  changeable
                in time,
          kw   - coefficient of permeability for water,

         M (t) - coefficient of the dynamic viscosity  of the  grout
                variable in time,
         Mw   - coefficient of the dynamic viscosity  of water.

BASIC PATTERNS FOR  INJECTION PROCESS

Pattern A.  - The  coefficient of the dynamic viscosity of the  grout
              is constant during the injection /J = constant  0< t < tg

In practice,  the  grout does  not  change its  capability for penetration or
these changes are practically omitted in an interval  of time (o, tg),
whereas after exceeding  the  gelation time  tg the grout gells rapidly.
The  analysis has been  carried out for the  injection phenomenon, according
to the  Pattern A (Figure 52J. It allows computation  of time of the grout
for penetration, distribution  of  pressure in the aquifer and  the  grout rate
depending upon  hydrogeological  parameters of the area, the  grout pro-
perties and conditions of pumping.
                               108

-------
          Fig.  50.  Pattern of grouting procces.
 When overpressure A H  occurs  in  time t=0 and the grout has not yet
 nan.-,+ ~.r,+_ J  - - J-  ••-'       "       '   ~        "~
                                                   ~ O
 penetrated  into the medium,  the  flow rate QQ amounts to:
                  Q.0=  2TT kw m
                                                 (9)
Where:
         m
       A H
         R
         r
aquifer thickness
overpressure introducing the grout
external radius of the aquifer
radius of the injection well
Whereas the  oiezometric pressure heads  h (r) are  distributed according
to  equation (lo)
                                 109

-------
                   h(r) =
A H
                            1  -t-
    Ln  -f
       lo
    In  JL
(10)
Where:
         r    -  distance from axle  of feeding hole
If  after time (t)  the  grout penetrates on a  distance  rB  , the piezometric
preassure head   h (TB)  on the  border line of two liquids can be determined
from the equality of  the  flow  rates in the  aquifer and in the layer  being
injected:
           2TTmk
 2TTmkw
hence
                                     To
                                  In
where:

          k   - coefficient of permeability of  the  soil covered by the inje-
                ction,  computed according to the formula

Indirect piezometric pressure  head is computed according  to:
                h(r)
h(rB)+- -





h(rB)
. r
1 n-f-
1 1
In-B.
r
AH-h(rB)
. p
n— •
1 I r°

In-^-
r







                                                     for   r0<.r
-------
The volume of flow depending  upon the  grout radius  can be  computed
according to one of the two following formulas:
                                   -
                                  ra
                                                                    (13)
or
                     Q
                       2TTkwmAH
                                 JJL
                                 I o
                                                                    (14)
Flow  velocity on the border line of two liquids amounts  to:
                     V(rB>
                              2TT m ran
By introducing into the formula   (.15) the Q  computed according  to  the
formula  (l4J reveals:
                          nra   |n-B-+ k*Lin IB.
                                  To   K     To
                                                                    (16)
Having computed the flow-velovity on the border line of two  liquids, depen-
ding upon the distance   rB time of the inject penetration for the distance
ra   can be computed  as  follows:
n- /4^
    v  v (r
    »4   T \' I
                                [nR -
                                                                    (17)
                 r.'
                                111

-------
The derived   analytical formulas  enable carrying  out  the  analysis  of  the
injection phenomenon and the selection  of the optimal conditions for intro-
ducing the  grout  into the soil.  Having  possibility of computing the time of
the  grout penetration for the distance  (r6) ,  the flow  velocity on the border
line of two  liquids  and  the  injection rate,  the magnitude  of the pressure
pumping head (A Ii) as well  as the  gelation time  (tg)  of the grout  can be
adjusted adequately for obtaining the  stabilized block of the required dimen-
sions.

For the pattern A  the  two  programs for computation  on the WANG 2200 mi-
nicomputer have  been constructed:

(ij    Program Al is used  for  the computation of penetration  time of the
      grout for  a required  distance ,

\2\    Program A2  is used  for the computation of the grout radius for  a
      given  time.

Both of the programs enables  computation of the injection  rate. Printouts
of the  programs  are presented in the Appendix A.  Figure 53 and 54 show
graphically the results  of computations  according to the  programs Al and
A2 for the  selected example:

    AH  =    10  m
      R  =   100  m
      r0 =   0,1 m

      kw =   5 x 10~4 m/s
      k      5 x 10"5 m/s

      n  =   0. 1

PATTERN  B  - The coefficient of  the dynamic viscosity  of the grout chan-
               ges  in time at  same  rate  in  the  whole  aquifer

                        JLJ  = ju(t)      for   0
-------
o'5- Q/
    m
MS]      [s]
        3-
                                -S-
                                                       10
                                                           Cm]
  Fig.  51  Dependence of time  and of the injection rate
           on the  radius range  rb  of the  grout,   according
           to the  pattern A  f computation with the program  A l)
                               113

-------
10'5- Q/i
 [m2/s]
m
       10
                                                          Q/i
                                                      m
                                                           B
                                                         10
                                                        t-1000
                                                         Cs]
 Fig.  52 Dependence  of the  radius range    ra  of the grout
         and of the injection rate  on  the  injection duration,
         according  to the pattern  A (computation  with  the
         program  A 2J.
                            114

-------
 Knowing the grout dynamical viscosity changes in time M\i) ,  the value k (t)
 is  calculated according  to  formula  (_8j.  In each step the mean coefficient
 of  permeability  is assumed.  Thus the function  k (t) is replaced  by the con-
 stant function in  the  particular  intervals (Figure  53\
       Fig.  53 Time  discretization of the function k   (t) .


The range of radius of the grout r'  in an optional time step "j" can
be computed knowing the  volume  or  the grout introduced into the soil
from the very beginning of the injection  to the end of the jtn step  (Fi-
gure 56) .
                 TV;!.-  WATERED  AREA
                      GROUTED AREA
                   0  r
                      B
Bj
      Fig. 54  The axial-symmetrical  sector  of the filtration  area with
               situation in the j   time step, for the pattern  B.

                                   115

-------
Assuming dependence

                      Vj =TTmn (r^2-  r/)                             (is)

one can determine  the  range od radius of the grout in the  j   time step:


                              Vi    .   .                              (19)
                             TTmn    °
where:
      V.   -  volume  of the grout introduced from the very beginning
            of the injection to the end of the j™ time step,

      r    -  range of radius of the grout in the soil in the j   time
        3    step,
      m   -  aquifer  thickness

      n    -  effective porosity of the medium.

The magnitude of V-;  is computed from dependence

                V.  =  V.  ,  +  A V.                                (20)
                 J      J-1         J                                V  J

where:
      V.    - volume of the grout in j-1    time step
       J
The increase  of the grout volume in time   A t. amounts to:
                                                J

                V.   -  Q .   At.                                   (2l)
                 J         J       J                                   ^  J
where:

     At.   -  j     time  step
        J

       Q.  -  mean flow  rate in the  j    time step.

The mean flow rate in  the  j   time step  is computed as  the arithmetic
mean  of the  final rate in  the j-1 1time step and of the rate  in  the jtn step
computed  according to  the formula:
                                 11.6

-------
                _.       21T m AH
                     1  i  IB) ,	l_ i   _K	
                    kj   r°    kyv    Tgi                               ^ -.
                                     J                               (22)


Since the  formula   (22)  includes  r'g-j,   i.e.  the value which is  searched
for,  the solution should be  sought by application of the iteration process.
Values QJ are assumed in  each iteration  step of the iteration  proces.s
according to the computation in the preceding iteration step.  In the  first
iteration of each time  step  it is  assumed that:


                         Q3   =  V
                           u       u

whereas in the first time step it is  assumed:

                     Q   =  o, 5  (Q   + Q )                          (23)

where:
     Q   -    flow rate before  injecting, according to
              the formula
The above  mentioned  iteration  process leads to the inequality


                                   <  &                             (24

where:
      Q,   -    rate value computed  in  the preceding iteration  step
       J
      &   -    optinally small  number  greater than zero.

For pracitcal computation  it may be  assumed as   &=  0,001.
If we  assume:
                  Qi  =      2TTAH
                  m    "i  '.   nTi
                                                                    (25)
                               117

-------
and further
                                                                    (26)
as well as
                   V.
           'i  =  •=•
            J       m
          y.   =   v     + A v.


then the formula    19    will  take a form:
                            Tin  + r°

 To follow the computation process more easily,  flowchart is given in figu-
 re  57.
 The above method of the solution of the injection  problems for the  pat-
 ter B has  been presented for a case, when socalled "bulb" is to be  made
 as a result of  the  injection. Then the grout  fills the aquifer limited  by
 the calindrical surfaces of radii  TB a^d r0, A  derivative  problem  is   a
 matter  of  computation  of the injection  range, injection rate etc.,  in con-
 ditions  when the inject  already  introduced into the soil is being  displaced
 by other liquid. As a result of  the grout stabilization the  bulb of a shape
 similar  to a cylindrical ring will be then created.  For the  pattern B,with
 displacement,   the solution is  obtained  similarly to the above,  with so-
 me of the  given formulas subject to the modification:
                              118

-------
                  C STOP
Fig.  55  Flowchart of  the program .Bl
                 119

-------
                           2TIAH
                          r.
                               1   .  R
                               :— In -r-
                               kw   rB;
                                                     for   j<
                                                      for   j > N<,
                                              rBj
                                                                    (28)
where:
         N.
         r  .  -
          wj
         k,   -
                  number  of the  step by  which  displacement of the grout
                  introduced previously is being  started,

                  range  of the radius  of  the  displaceing liquid,
                  coefficient of permeability  for the displaceing liquid.
The range  radii of the inject  and of the  displaceing liquid  are computed
according to  the following formulas:
                   Bj
                         LL
                         'Tin
                                 +
(29)
                   wj
                            W]
                           Tin
                                 +  r.
(30)
where:    v
           J
                  sum of volumes of   the  grout and  of the  displaceing
                  liquid in the soil,  in the  jtn time  step divided by m

                  volume of the  displaceing liquid  in the  soil., in the j^
                  time  step divided by m
with
                              v   +   v
                               j
                                                                    (31)
                                   120

-------
For the pattern B the  two programs     for computation on the  WANG 2200
minicomputer have been constructed:
l)  Program Bl  is used for computation of the  grout range, in case  when
    a bulb is to be made as a result of the injestion,

2)  Program B2  is used for computation of the dimensions  of a block to be
    created by the injection with  displacement by another  liquid.

The programs also enable the computation  of the mean injection rate  in   the
particular time  steps.  The printouts of the  programs are presented in Appen-
dix A. Figures  58 and 59 illustrate graphically the results of computation of
the programs Bl and B2,  for the  following data:

               ^ H   =     10  m
                  R        100  m
                  r0  =    0.1  m
                  kw  -    5 x  10"4 m/s
                  n   =    0. 1

Coefficient of permeability for  the grout (kj changes linearily from 5  x 10"^
m/s  for t-0 to 0 for  t = tg = 10000 seconds. As an example of the injection
with displacement, the pumping of an additional liquid   water  had begun after
5000 seconds since beginning of the injection.

Pattern  C  - The coefficient of the dynamic viscosity of the grout changes
             in  time  and in the aquifer  /-i =/J (t,  rj    for    0
-------
KT3-Q/m    r'
         B
                                                        B
                                                     10   t-1000
Fig.  56  Dependence of the  radius range  r'   and the rate
         of the  injection Q  on the duration of  the injection t,
         for  the  pattern B ^computation according to  the
         program  B 1 J.
                        122

-------
10-3-Q/m     rB/

 [m2/s]      Cm]
        b
                                                        10   t • 1000
                                                              O3
    Fig.  57 Dependence of the radius  range r'   of the  grout
            the  radius range of the dilating liquid r    and
            of the injection rate Q on the duration of  the
            injection t for the pattern B'(computation according
            to the program  B  2
                                123

-------
The situation in the  j    time  step has been presented schematically for
a sector of the  injection area figure  58.
              •£#•=1 WATERED AREA

                    GROUTED  AREA
    Fig.  58 Axial-symmetrical sector of the  injection area  with
            situation in the j*n time step, for the pattern C.
where:
                                                                   .th
        V.  -   elementary colume of the  grout introduced in the  j
                time step,

 whereas: r   -  .'range of the first portion of the grout in the   j   time
                step,  being  simultaneously the  range of radius of the
grout in the
                                  time step.
 For each portion of the grout, there is a different coefficient of permeabi-
 lity  the characteristic feature  of the pattern C  depending  on the time
 during which  the grout resides  in the soil.  It is  convenient  to assume the
 division  of the injection  duration into  equal time  steps  A.  t . For the sym-
 bols given on Figure  60,  the ranges  of pontions being introduced in the  j
 time  step and in the previous  steps can be . computed successively.  The com-
 putation  should be  commenced from the range of portion of  the grout introdu-
 ced in the first step:
                        1 61
                A Vj
                TTm n
                                                                    (32)
                               124

-------
A general formula for the radius range- of the  particular portions of the grout,
according to the symbols  given on  Figure  60 is  as follows:
                           + r^.-,                               (33
                \  ITmn

         for 1   -  1,2, .... f  j

Where:  rg0~ ^oj where  r0 is the radius  of feeding well,  and for  I=j.The ran-
ge of the grout is obtained in the j^h  time step.   The volume introduced into
the  soil in the  j^*1 time  step  is computed according to the  following formula:


          ^V   =  Q  A t                                      (34)
             J       J

where:

           Q4  =  0.5  I  Q, , +  Q, J                               135
                         ._x  +  Q.)
The  rate  Q. mentioned in  the  formula ^35 J  is expressed by the following
formula:   ^
                          2TT mA H
                                                                 (36
where:
        k  - coefficient of permeability of the grout in the 1   time step.


The formula  {36J is valid  for  eachj = l,2,  ...,  N provided  that the  division
of the  injection duration has been done with the  constant step (A t) .

Due to the fact that  it is impossible to compute Q-; directly from the formula
  (36) which contains values sought for  in  each time step, the  computation
is carried  out  by the  method of   successive approximations  (  iteration
method  J. In the  first approximation (the first  iteration )  it  is assumed
that  Q. = Q.   , It  enables computation  of  the  first approximation of the
ranges sought for the  particular grout portions, and next to compute  the
second approximation  Q,    according to  the formula  (36).   Such a  pro-
                                125

-------
cedure in  the  iteration cycle leads  to  achieving the  convergence  criterion
according  to  formula (2^.  For practical purposes one can  assume success'
fully that  £=0.001 and such a value has been  adopted in the  constructed
programs.   For  the  first time step it  is  assumed  Q0 behaves according
to  formula(9)
                 Qj              2TTAH
                 m
                                               61,
As well as
dj                                               ,   .
                                                 (38j
                m
Then the formula(^26 Jwill be simplified to the form  of:
            r   .-=
             61   1    TTm
                                                 (39)
For simplifying  the  computation process,  the  algorithm of the solution
is given in a form of flowchart in  Figure  61.


In case of displacement of  the grout introduced into the soil previously,
the  solution is  obtained by applying the above mentioned method,  but some
of the given formulas undergo the following modifications:
                                126

-------
               V
 DATA
INPUT
                     1
                     (= 0
                 _ _?..TT A H
                              NO
                           K_w
                  C  STOP  )
Fig, 59.  Flowchart of the  program C  1.
                       127

-------
                                 2TTAH
                                                    for   jNi
                 L-J-1V2
where:
        N     - number  of the  step from which the displacement of the
                grout introduced  previously begins,

        k     - coefficient of permeability for  the  displaceing liquid.

The  range  of the grout in the j   step  is  determined according to the formula
(39) for 1  = j, while the range  of the displaceing  liquid   is   determined
according to  the same formula introducing
              1     j  -  N1 +  1  (for  j > N

For the pattern C the two  programs have been  elaborated for computation
on the  WANG  2200 minicomputer:

1   Program  C 1  is used for  computation of the injection radius in case
    when  a bubl is to be made as  a result of the injection,

2   Program  C 2  is used for  computation of dimensions of the block of a
    cylindrical form to be made  as a result of the injection with displacement

The programs enable the computation of the mean rate of the injection in the
particular time steps. The  printouts of the programs are  given in the Appendix
A. Figures 62  and 63 present graphically the results of computation  of the
programs  C 1 and C 2 for  the following data:
A H
  R
  rc
  kv
  n
                           10 m
                          100 m
                          0, 1 m
                          5 x ID'4 m/s
                          0,1
                               128

-------
Coefficient of permeability for the  grout
5 x  ICr5 m/s  for
                                           k   changes linearily from
                   t  =  0  to 0 for  t  =  tg  =  10000 seconds.

In case of the  injection  with,  displacement  the water  has been used as
the  displaceing liquid.  The displacement began after 5000   seconds from
the  beginning  of the  injection.
                                                                 B
                                                              10    t • 1000
                                                                    [s]
        Fig.  60 Dependence  of the radius range r'   of the grout
                and  the  injection rate of the injection duration,
                according to the pattern C ( complutation according
                to the program C  l).
                                  129

-------
Id"3- Q/m     rn .  r
                                                        B
    Fig.  61  Dependence of the  radius range r'  of the grout
             the  radius range rw of the  di'splaceing liquid and
             the  injection rate  on  the injection duration
             according to the pattern C ( computation according
             to the  program  C 2 ).
                            130

-------
                            SECTION XII

              LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS OF GROUTING PROCESS


PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATIONS

Laboratory investigations of the chemical grouting have been carried out in
application of the isomorphic ground models. The purpose of the  investiga-
tions have been the following:

-  examining the penetration properties of the  grouts during the  filtration,

-  examining different procedures for introducing the grouts  forming va-
   rious shapes of stabilized blocks,

«  comparing the different values characterizing the  injection process re-
   corded during the  laboratory tests, with the  results of computations
   carried out  according to the mathematical model for the grout flow  in
   porous medium discussed in Section XL

The realization of the assumed tasks was the condition for measuring satis-
factory results of the field investigations and determining the  practical
application of the grouts  for soil  stabilization. The  laboratory tests consis-
ted in pumping the grout through a perforated well and  obtaining a  radial
dispersion in the porous  medium. The injection process was  aimed at
obtaineing shapes of stabilized bloks which might be used in engineering  have
been  investigated (Figure 62) :   (ij  bulbs  piles which could be used in
foundations or in construction of unpermeable curtains, (2)   rings for
construction of shafts, galleries,  caissons or underground chambers,  and
 (3J  horizontal plates used as bottoms for  underground chambers, cais-
sons, etc.
                               131

-------
3     horizontal plates used as bottoms for underground chambers, cais-
      sons, etc.
       bulb/pile
ring
horizontal place
  Fig. 62.  Basic shapes of the stabilized blocks by grouting.


  In order to examine the possibility of the injection in different hydrological
  formations, various water-soil  conditions were simulated during the inves-
  tigations.  The model investigations for the  injections have been studied of
  the  experiments have  been in homogeneous soils, while 2 experiments have
  been done in  the heterogeneous  medium containing layers of different  perme<
  ability coefficients. A  total  of 29 experiments have been carried out.

  DESCRIPTION OF MODEL INVESTIGATIONS

  Model to investigate

  The experiments have  been  conducted by application of a model, as presen-
  ted  in Figures 63, 64. It consists of a basin in which two perforated cy-
  linders have been placed for modeling the soil  medium.  The basin is  used
  maintaining an optional water level in the soil. Inside each basin is the injec-
  tion  well which is used for  pumping the grout into the soil. The pumping
  pressure has been regulated by the  hydrostatic level of  liquid in the tank
  of the feeding installation.

  The basin filled with soil has been used to simulate the hydraulic boundary
  conditions in tests with water-bearing soils as well a rational confining of
  the investigated zone of the soil. In addition,  the basins facilitated  the ex-
  change of soil,  cl'eaning and washing of the blocks.
                                132

-------
GO
CO










lr
>
r










^

^
1










•>
])












\

























k ,

|
I
jrn
1

»
1 . • . -- .- .
1 — 1.: - - '• -• -': '
,•.-••-.•:
=-- * .
I/' /*.-..'.'•••'
3- - .* .- -•- "-
!••- •:•••:-.
i •-: --"."- •
3"
" -• . . - " \
r. -' '-.'-.' • .• _
J*
- * " •-«-
i . • . . " *
i • •
i ' •••'•'•,-
i v- ' ^
i ;--".-•..
i . > - • * •
6

1
p®
\
1
«
»
...:-.--.- -I
• - .". \ • 1
. " •


. • j .' ' • •'
• .' © '-- -\-'l
••- '-.•".- -1
	 (IT) "" " '1
• . . * " .. " * ' 1
-- . - ~~ i
. ' • • i
-*- . • • -1
"• " '* ' • v 1
^®S -" -'-In
-^ " - - ' I
•' •--- .:'j-(D-
.-..""; • i ©
' ' T — r
J_^. 	 __ 	 ,.- i — j.


1
1



1 ' "
-i . •
' • ' '
3 "
j -• . •
I"/ -\~
r ';:


1 . ; -/
] - -'-:•

3 • .
I, ' '
1 . /
1. . '
1. -
1


i
1 ®
ip



.
*
•
-
»
- -
• - ,
_ - *

• • > •
• - . '-
- * * ••
^. ; 	 f
•' ->-^
- ' _^
' . " —
/ • »
^
f.



L'




,
*
V -.

•






— ; Sr

— c=
— IP
-

50











.

(
-
(
<



-

•




~1
J-d)




. .. -
* . • \
t ~

\ - *.
\ »
2)-.-' -•
. - -. '
^*^ * ' "

"
.' - *
. .
- • • -
2>' •-.:/.
. • • • • -"
• - . • .
'- - • •
-






*



~~~ .


'
•


!







1
u













in
CO

— v j




0
CO

0


















r
^~CM






i

                                                                                            1.  basin
                                                                                            2.  perforated cylinder
                                                                                            3.  gate
                                                                                            4.  soil
                                                                                            5.  water
                                                                                            6.  injection well
                                                                                            7.  filter
                                                                                            8.  inject
                                                                                            9.  pressure tank
                                                                                           10.  tank
                                                                                           11.  pump
                 Fig. 63. Model for investigation of the grouting

-------
Fig. 64. View of the model for investigation of the grouting.
                             134

-------
 Preparing the soil medium

 For modeling the soil media,  three types of sand of different permeability
 properties have been applied.  Depending on  the purpose of the experiment.
 one type of sand was applied to obtain the homogeneous medium, and tb > -
 types  to obtain the  heterogeneous  stratified medium   (Figure 65DJ  .
 In each case, the soil was consolidated by the  5 cm  layers, applying always
 the same  quantity of strokes of a punner. After having filled the basin with
 water,  the full  saturation of the  medium has been obtained. The soil zone
 destined for the  injection under  pressure was prepared from  an optional
 sand,  limiting it by ceiling and floor modeled form an impervious  foil, and
 additionally from clay. As the water level in the basin was above the ceiling
 of the soil layer, it was  under pressured conditions  (Figure 65C J  .
 The natural conditions of the grout filtration occurred when the water level
 in the basin was  below the  upper boundary of the  permeable medium
  (Figure  65B) .

 Measurement of soil medium properties

 Some properties of  the sands were determined  prior to the model  studies.
 They were; granulometric and petrographic  composition,  pH reaction, co-
 efficient of permeability as determined in the standard columns. However,
 due to the procedure of-preparing the models and the  heterogeneity  of the
 soil, it was  necessary to examine, each time,  the effective porosity and
 water content of sands placed in  the  basins.  To this end, the  samples of sand
 were taken for determining the effective porosity  which appeared nearly
 the same and amounted to an average of n =0.  35. The water  content of
 each particular soils was  different. These properties were  determined each
 time by pumping the same quantity of water  V  = 4000 cm  under the same
 pressure HW  = 40 cm of head.  On the basis of  these measurements the
 coefficient of permeability has been computed as  follows:
                                     "O
                    0. 366  . Q  .log  	                         ,  -,
               k = 	*	12	                   (41)
                            m .  H
                                 w
After determining the properties of the modeled soil medium, a suitable
mixture of the  grout was selected.  Its composition depended on the purpose
of each experiment and the required effects of the injection. The quality
of the mixture decided the gelation time as well as grout viscosity changes
in time. Care was always taken to obtain a gelation time longer than the
expected time of pumping the grout,  so that it would be possible to pump
in the whole  prepared portion. The expected time of pumping the grout was
computed  on the basis of the formula 42.  Attempts were to have an invariab-
le viscosity of the grout during the time of injection. Each time after having
determined the composition of the mixture , the gelation time and  viscosity
                              135

-------
               k -
                      0.366. Qw,  log
         (41)
                                   w
                       B
D
Fig. 65.  Models of the soil media to be injected.

changes were examined for the samples. The samples were  maintained at
a constant temperature  equal to the soil  temperature. In the experiments,
the grouts having different gelation times were tested in the  range of tg=25
to 300 minutes, density   ^  =1.1 G/cm^, concentration of  31 and 42 per-
cent, and the initial viscosities of ,ui =  3. 0-10. 0 cP. The whole portion of
the prepared grout was poured into the auxiliary basin  (Figure 63J   from
which,  gradually,  during the injection it was pumped out to the pressure
tank maintaining it at a  constant level.

The grout was pumped into the soil from the pressure tank through a perforated
injection pipe. The pumping pressure was determined as a product of the height
of the column of the  grout above the water level in the resin and of the grout
density. The pumping caused the penetration of the grout from the pipe into
the soil, and the range of penetration depended upon pressure, pumping time,
viscosity , and on permeability and porosity of the soil.  During the experi-
ment the injection rate was examined in  order to avoid a local channelization
of the soil. This occurred in the  firts experiments  and  additional sealing plugs
had to be used above the upper edge of the well filter.  These plugs had been
installed before applying the  grouts of short gelation time. The prevented
breaks occurring in the injection well.
                                  136

-------
Fig. 66. Method for injecting a bulb (pile)
        1.  pumping of the grout
        2.  solidified  soil
                       137

-------
Fig. 67. Method for injecting a ring.
      1.  pumping  of the grout
      2.  area covered by grout
      3.  ares covered by water
          138

-------
Fig. 68. Method for injecting a horizontal plate

      1. pumping of the grout
      2. pumping of the supporting liquid
      3. area covered by supporting liquid
      4. area covered by grout
             ] 39

-------
A bulb was constructed by pumping the grout into the soil and then withdrawing
the injected apparatus. The apparatus was washed with water to enable utilizing
it again  (Figure 66)  .  If the purpose was to construct  a ring, the  grout was
firts pumped into the ground with the  displacing liquid   most often water
pumped quickly thereafter through the same filter.  The pressure  of  the displa-
cing liquid caused the translocation of the grout towards  the  cylinder limiting
the medium  (Figure 6?)  . Under the proper pressure, this translocation went
on horizontally, parallel to the ceiling and floor of the  layer. Under condi-
tions of unco fined flow the grout displaced  spatially according to  the current
line.  The  displacing liquid was pumped in the  precise quantity necessary for
displacement prior to gelation of the grout.  If the purpose of the  experiment
was to obtain a horizontal plate, the grouting was  carried  out by means  of
a special tripartite  well. This well contained a filter divided  into  three sec-
tors. Each had a separate joint with its own pressure tank   (Figure  68j .
The grout was pumped throught the middle sector. The supporting liquids had
to maintain a flat upper and lower  spreading surface for the grout.  The applied
supporting liquids were  resin withhout hardener, brine and  2  percent solution
of the hydrochloric acid. Both , the grout and  the supporting liquids were pum
ped in under the same pressure, albeit the  rates of  the particular liquids were
different. After injection of all the grout, the pumping of the  supporting fluids
also ceased.

After completing each experiment, the injection well was withdrawn and washed
in order to avoid its contamination by the residues  of the grout. After 24
hours, the  stabilized block was extracted and  rinsed with a stream  of wa-
ter, to show the real form of the  stabilization. Next, the measurements and
photos were taken and the shape of the block was plotted. The volume of  the
block \|$  ,the radius rg   and the height hg  were measured.  Simultaneously,
the local deformations were  determined and compared with the water-soil con-
dition of the model. The deformation observed served as a basis  of  correc-
tion of the investigation plan.


ANA LYSIS OF  RESULTS

Procedure for  conducting the analysis

The laboratory investigations cover a total of 29 successful experiments  of
the  injection process coverting 9  experiment forming bulbs, 12 rings  and
8 forming horizontal plates under  laboratory conditions.
Stabilized blocks were obtained as a result of pumping the grout into one  in-
jection hole. In the  studies all the  blocks were of axial-symetrical form.
Thus, determing a form of the block consisted in determining its  height  which
depended on the length of the filter and the radius of the  grouting.  This ra-
dius , assuming uniform permeability and porosity of the soil, was  found to
depend upon, the pressure magnitude applied to the grout, time of pumping
                                  40

-------
the grout, viscosity of the grout and well radius. The magnitude of applied
pressure was limited  by the magnitude of stresses in  the soil.  During  the
injection,  disturbance of the soil structure was  found to be  detrimental to
symmetry of geometric form. With such a limitation for the grout of a  de-
termined viscosity, the range of the grouting may  be controlled by the
grouting time. Results of the experiments compared laboratory  results with
theoretical computed  ones.  The  comparison covered: injection times, volu-
mes  of stabilized blocks as well as dimensions of  these blocks (radii and
heights}  .

Injection time

For the purpose of modeling the injection, it was found to be very important
to determine exactly the pumping time necessary to obtain the radius  of the
grouting. The gelation time is  determined by the selection of a  suitable  mix-
ture of the grout.  In cases when there is no possibility to examine the form
of the obtained block, the only criterion of correctness of the structure may
be a comparison of the injection time measured under natural conditions with
the  computed time.

The  injection time for the grouted bulb under the constant pumping pressure
 ( AH = const) has been computed according to  the formula derived in the
Section XI.
                             "w
                                                'B
The outer and the inner radius of the stabilized block as well as the injec-
tion time for the ring have been compiited by the numerical methods, as for
the pattern B   ( Section XI)   .

It should be noted that the applied methods for computations refer to the axial
symmetrical cases of the filtration which occur when applying the complete
filter in the pressured layer,  or in a length  of the filter which is many times
greater than the injection range. In laboratory investigations,  during uncon-
fined fiow> short filters were applied more than once, therefore, the isomor-
fic  model did not coincide fully with the theoretical one.  The injection time
computed as above was comparable with that measured during the  experi-
ment .
                               141

-------
 Volume of stabilized block

 The projected range of the grouting,  the height of the block, the volume of
 the bulb and the horizontal plate were computed according to the formula:
                                                                    (43)
 The formula for the ring volume can be expressed as follows:
                                                                   (44)
, On the basis of the computed block volume of the stabilized soil the quantity
 of grout necessary to the pumping has been computed:
                        n-VB                                       (45)
 During the experiments,  it was not always possible to pump the projected
 quantity of the grout or the water, so the theoretical volumes of blocks were
 computed on the basis of the real volumes of the pumped grout  or water,
 according to the formula:

                            v  = JL
                                                                  (46)


                                                                   47)
 The computed volumes of blocks and  interiors were compared to the res
 pective magnitudes of blocks stabilized during investigations on models,
                                142

-------
The volume of the stabilized blocks were determined by measuring the volu-
me of water superseded by the block submerged in the calibrated vessel.

Assuming that the stabilized block is in a forms a cylinder,  the injection
radius for the pumped  volume  of the grout was computed according to the
formula:
                          re =
                                    V
  7T-n-Lf                              (48)
In the case of a  ring, the theoretical injection range was computed according
to the formula:	.
JT •  n •  L
                                        f
                                                                     /  N
                                                                     (49)
 Measurement of the injection radius encountered difficulties in some cases
 due to formation  of irregular block forms.  The mean value of r^ was assu-
 med to be  the calculated cross-section.  During unconfined flow the grout
 was  found to spread out above and below the filter.  For these cases, it was
 assumed that the computed height of the block was equal to the length of the
 injection well filter:

                      h'B  =  Lf                                      (50J

 The  block height  measured from the lowest to the highest  point was  assumed
 as the reliable one.


 An element frequently used in practice is a bulb (pile) .  It is apj.< >    - '\  sta-
 bilizing foundation construction and underground  cuttings,  shafts, tunnel, as
 well as for building  cut-off walls (Figures 62 and 66 )  . In the first series
 of the experiments,  9 cases  were examined.
 They  covered:

   (a )  one bulb in unwatered soil,
   (b)  three bulbs  in watered soil (unco fined flow) ,
   (c)  three bulbs  in watered soil (confined flow ) ,
   (dj  two bulbs in  watered,  stratifield soil (unconfined  flow)  .

 During the experiments,  different  grout compositions were applied, modifying
 the resins  by water,  glycol or hexamethylene tetramine.  The resins were
 hardened by oxalic  acid or ammonium chloride.  The  initial viscosity of the
 applied  resins changed from 3  to 11  cP, while the  gelation time ranged from
 35 to 250 minutes.  Table 25  presents the properties of the grouts used in all
 three series.

 Table 26 presents a compilation of data concerning methods for the grouting
 operation.  It should be noted that column 8 gives the mean viscosity moa-


                                143

-------
sured  during the experiment. In some cases, the mean viscosity is different
from the initial one, which refers to the stage obtained immediately after
having mixed the resin with the hardener.

Table 27 presents a compilation of the computed and measured dimensions
of the bulbs. Table  28 contains a comparison of the computed and measured
injections times, volumes, radii and heights of bulbs.

Figures 69 and 70 shows schematically the cross-sections of the bulbs, with
their basic dimensions. The  position of the filter is also marked as:
double hatched space. A comparative compilation given  in Table 28 enables
estimation of the accuracy of the computation methods.

The ratio of the  computed times to the measured ones changes in the range
of 0. 83^^i. <_ 1. 41.  Discrepancies result, from difficulties in determining
the coefficient of; permeability "kw , and next,  from heterogeneity of the
soil in the model. Similar difficulties will occur under the natural conditions.
On the basis of this series of experiments, computation of injection time, may
be in error by 50 percent.

Comparing the computed and measured volumes indicates that the  ratio

VB                                                         VB
——   changes for the saturated soils in the range of 0. 75 ^	   ^  1. 54,
  B                                                         VB
and for the dry soil to 0. 46.  In most cases the volumes  fit in within the accu-
racy of 10 percent.  In experiment 2, the computed volume is greater by
54 percent, than the measured one.  This  experiment should be treated  as
a partial failure, since  a  considerable spreading of the grout occurred on
the external part of the  bulb. The proof was  a number of cavities appearing
on the bulb surface.  In  case of the bulb obtained in the unwatered soil
 (experiment 1 )  , the  measured volume is twice as large as the computed
one.  Investigation revealed that the grout did not fill all the soil pores.
The shape of the bulb and its position in relation to the  filter means that the
grout flowed down under the influence of gravity (Figure 7l)  .

A comparison of the measured and computed radii of the bulbs
           /
0,77 ^ ——  
-------
TADJ.K 25.  COMPOSITIONS OF GROUTS
Mixture
no.


1

(j
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Contents of grout
Type
of
rosin

2

MS-167
MS-167
MS-16T
MS-10
MS-10
MS-10
MS-10
MS-10
MS- 1 0
MS-lSr
MS-lp
MS-10
MS-10

Water
p . o . w .
100 p. u. W.
resin
3

24, 0
25, 0
32, 5

32, 5
45, 0
42, 5
60, 0
42, 5

50, U
50, 0
50, 0

Ethyl ene
glycol
p.o. w.
1UO p. u. w.
resin
4

20
15







5




Urolropin
p . o . w .
100 p. u. w.
resin
5



2, 0

Ammonium
chloride
p. o. w.
100 p.o. w.
resin
6



7,5 •
1, U 1 5,0
3,0 j 10, U
1, 5
1, 5
2, 0
2, 0


0, 5
0, U
L 	
5, 0
7, 5
6, 7
7, 5

6, 2
6, 2
6, 2
	 * 	 	 1
10% solution
of oxalic acid
_p. o. w.
100 p.o. w.
resin
7

5/0
10, 0






\
45, 0




Initial
viscosity


cP
8

6, 0
7, 0
8, 5
11, 2
4, 5
4, 5
'5, 7
3, 0
4, 5
6, 2
5, 0
5, 0
5, U

Density

G
cm3
9

1, 10
1, 10
1, 10
1, 14
1, 10
1, 10
1, 10
i, ro
i; is
1, 10
1, 10
i.'i'o
.1, 10

        MS-10       resin modified by PS /F  : M :  1'S  = 2, 1 :  1, U :  0, 003/
        MS-167      resin modified by PS /F  : M :  PS  = 2, 1 :  1, 0 :  0, 049/
        Properties of resins are given in SECTION VI.

-------
TABLE 26.  RESULTS OF LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS   BULBS

            Types of models:  A   umvatered soil; B    watered soil, unconfined flow; C    watered soil, confined flow; D - watered and stratified soil,
                              uncoiifined flow
Test
no.



1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Model



2
A
B
B
B
C
C
C
D
D
l 	
Water capacity i Grout
Volume
of
water
Vw
3
cm
3 '
2900
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
	
Time of water pumping

tw
h

0
0
0
0
1
0
'o
0
0
m
4
00
07
40
14
50
14
03
02
04
s

48
14
53
49
00
31
06
57
41
Coefficient
of
permeability
kw
cm/s
5
-3
6, 60- 10
1, 24' 10"3
-3
0, 22- 10
0, 66- 10~
0, 24' 10~3
-3
1, 82' 10
8, 54- 10"
-3
7, 05' 10
5, 01- 10~
MixLure
no.



6
12
5
7
ii
14
13
13
13
11
Volume

V
cm3
7
2850
2150
2750
1900
2050
3000
3000
4000
4000
Mean
visco-
sity
	
cP
8
5, 7
10, 0
14, 2
15,0
6, 0
9, 7
20, 0
3, 0
4, 5
Grouting
Pres-
sure

H
cm
9
80
122
80
100
40
140
235
40
28
Measured
time

- - - - - -
ti
h

0
0
1
0
3
0
1)
0
0
m
10
05
05
42
30
05
11
03
03
10
s

30
00
00
00
00
00
50
45
17
Computed
time

ti
h

0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
m
11
04
07
56
41
29
13
03
03
13
s

36
00
40
27
20
56
28
33
20
                             146

-------
TABLE 27.  DIMENSIONS OE BULBS

Test
n. o.



™
	 1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9

	 	 - - 	 i
Dimensions of
injection well
r
Lenght

f

cm
2
30
30
30
30
28
23
26
30
30

i
Radius
r
o

cm
3
1,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
1,5
1,5
r 	 ~t
Computed
volume
of the
block
V
B
3
cm
4
	 1
8 140
6 143
7 857
5 423
5 857
3 571
1, 5 3 571
1, 5 11 420
1, 5 11 420
L _ _ _J _ _ _ __
i 	 1
Measured
volume
of the
block
V
B
3
cm
5
	 	 1
17 800
4 000
3 500
5 500
6 000
8 400
11 680
18 000
22 000

r 	
Computed
injection
range
r'
B

cm
6
10, 03
8, 72
9,36
7, 59
8, 16
16, 12
10,24
-
-
	 . 	 j
Measured
injection
range


r
cm
7
13, 0
8,5
13, 5
7,5
8, 5
10,0
12, 0


L 	
Real
height
of the
block
h
B
_

cm
8
40
25
41
•
41
28
23
26
30
30


-------
TABLE 28.  COMPARATIVE COEFFICIENTS OF INJECTION TIMES
          AND BULBS DIMENSIONS
Test
no.
	 	 	 •-
_».-. — . - _ _ _ -^
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
*'i
I
i
— ----------
—
2
0, 84
1, 40
1, 14
1, 38
0, 81
1, 26
0, 91
0, 94
1,29
V/B
VB
	 	 	 	 - 1
3
1, 46
1, 53
0, 92
0, 99
0, 98
1. 02
0, 74
U, 63
0, 52
L 	
r/B
•rB
" 	 	 	
4
0, 77
1, 02
0, 73
1, 01
0, 96
1, 61
0,85
-
.- 	 . 	
h/B Lf
HB hB
-
5
0, 75
1, 20
0, 73
0, 73
1, 00
1,00
1, 00
1, 00
1, 00
L 	 , 	
                           048

-------
                                       Jr3s.
                                        17
                                        15
           25
 o
           12
           (7
                                      ^  i4   i
Fig. 69. Cross-sections of the bulbs obtained in the tests 1-6,
                   149

-------

                                                           o
                                                           to
                                                        J	L
                                               8
Fig. 70. Cross-sections of the bulbs obtained in the tests 7-9.
                        150

-------
                                                    1
Fig. 71. Bulb obtained in  unsaturated soil  ( tests l) .
                    15]

-------
plugging affects the filter in the obvious manner, of producing irregular stabi-
lized blocks.  The bulbs obtained in the heterogenous sands proved that the
injection range depends upon the permeability of the layers.

In both experiments 8 and 9, grout  flowing down into lower part of the per-
meable layer was observed. This was caused by binding time being considerab-
le greater than the pumping time of the  grout.

These experiments proved the possibility of these grout compositions  for
obtaining bulbs (piles) . The experimental  results confirmed the accuracy of
the theoretical analysis (Section XI) .  In practice, in most tests, length ot
the bulb is multiples greater than the diameter. In this situation the presen-
ted theoretical scheme of the radial flow will be closer to the real one than
that which occurred during model investigations, where short  filters were
applied. Due  to the difficulties in determining the exact coefficient of permea-
bility, and due to a possibility of heterogeneity, the computed  injection times
should be increased by 50 percent.  Due to the  possibility of spreading grout
in the frontal zone,  the grout volume should be computed with  some reserve.
It is estimated that such a reserve  should amount to approximate 10 percent.

Forming rings with soil and grout leaves  unstabilized soil inside the streng-
thened structure thereby decreasing the quantity of the applied grout,  and
enabling the reduction of the costs.  Investigations of the  ring  series included
studies of seven  rings during unconfined grout flow  and five rings during
confined grout flow.

Table 29 gives the compilation of the data for the laboratory investigations,
Unlike Table  26,  Table 29 contains  data regarding the grout dilution by water
or by brine. In the experiments  14, 15 and 16, the salt  solution of a density
equal to the density of the grout   y =1.10   ^ ^      has been applied as
the diluting liquid.                         Cll>

Table 30 shows the compilation of the computed and measured dimensions  of
the rings.  The comparison of the computed  and  measured results are given
in Table 31.  The columns show the relations of the computed  magnitudes to
the  measured ones.  In column 4, the computed volumes  of the ring interior
have been compared to the measured ones.  The ring interior has been compu-
ted on the basis of geometrical dimensions. When comparing the  radii,  the
external radius of the ring has been taken into consideration.  Schematic cross
sections of the blocks obtained in the experiments 10-21  are shown in Figu-
res  74, 75.

Comparing the ration of the computed and measured times, we see that of
the 12 cases,  8 of the values were 0. 89  <   ti   < 1.27.
                    t'                  %    t-    ^
17, the ratio  was    i   _  1. 69.              l
                           In experiment
152

-------
Fig. 72. Cross-section of the bulb obtained during unconfined grout
        flow (test 3) .
                          153

-------
Fig. 73. Bulb
obtained during confined grout flow  (test l)
                         154

-------
TABLE 29.  RESULTS OF LABOHATOKY INVESTIGATIONS - RINGS




§
tfl
0)


1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21





-u
o
g


2y
B
"
"
"
"
11
"
c
"
"
"
11

Water capacity



Volum
of
water
V
w
3
cm
3
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000




° t

h














t
w
m
4
03
07
06
06
06
13
12
48
21
58
18
15


s

32
26
04
04
59
00
40
33
33
34.
27
59



^ 3
'o rt
S° g
8 I
w
cm/s
1 5
-3
10, 18- 10
5, 59- lo"3
4, 85- 10~3
4, 85' 10~3
3, 49- 10"3
1, 78- 10r3
1, 6~ '.0~3
0, 50- 10
1,41' 10"3
0, 42' 10~3
1, 42- 10"3
1, 42. 10~3


Grout


o
Mixture i


6
8
8
9
g
9
9
9
11
11
12
12
12




Volume
V,
•3
crei
7
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
3700
3000
3000
3000
3000
3000




Mean
viscosit^

cP
3
4, 5
4, 5
11,2
11, 2
11, 2
11, 2
11, 2
4, 5
4, 5
(i, 0
4, 5
4, 5




QJ
Pressur

1 CrouLuiK


•a
in p
d 'Jj
L
T' 'i
cm 'i
9
11 O!
•1C

4U|
R 0,
81
St
111
!H
ill
•U
•II
•1 1



1


1



m
10
14
13
21
47
22
30
10
52
30
41
36
25
j 	
6

17
03
15
03
00
00
00
00
00
25
50
40
	


T3
II
b
U
^
h








1

1


----
m
11
05
16
27
13
19
35
41
22
25
45
43
32
	
s

09
40
40
40
00
30
00
HO
40
(JO
40
05

Dilation


QJ
Pressur
»w
cm
12
80
80
80
10
5
5
200
80
80
40
80
80



P
u-, cr
Volume o
dilating li
c
3
cm
~~
13
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
8000
3000
400
3000
4000




VH 60
C T)
OJ 'K -^<
ft -3 °<
H 3 3


14
water
"
11
11
w. H-NaCl
"
M
water
M
"
11
11
J 	



II
'c
m

4
6
11
37
15
15
10
50
21
10
11
16

s
15
35
10
00
20
00
00
00
00
30
30
03
00

                    U55

-------
TABLE 30.  DIMENSIONS OF RINGS
-- - T -- ~r -- 	 T- - ~- 	 1 	

Test
no.



	 1

— 	
—
	
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
i
i
i
Dimensions of
injection well

L,enght


L
f ,

cm
2
— J
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
21
24
30
28
25"


i
Radius


r
o
	 — _ .j
cm
	 1
3
0,5
0,5
1,0
1,0
1,0
1,0
1,0
i, o
1,0
i, o
i, o
1, o'
Computed
volume
of
petrified
block

r
V'
B
_____

cm
r 	
4
11 43Q
11 430
II 430
11 430
11 430
11 430
10 573
3 571
3 571
3 571
8 571
8 57T
i
i
Measured
volume
of
petrified
block

V
B
" |
3
cm
5
12" 000
II 900
27 000
" 21 000
18 500
17 000
18 500
9 500
3 500
1 142
15 500
15 120

Computed
volume
of the
dilated
block
interior
V'
c -
3
cm
6
_
-
11 430
11 430
11 430
11 430
11 430
8 571
3 571
I Quo
3"~571
11 430

r
	 T 	 1 	
Measu-
red volu-
me of
the dila-
ted block
interior
V
C
3
cm0
_ _. 	
7

-
4 QUO
4 000
4 OOu
4 OuU
5 000
4 500
10 OOu
1 QUO
7 000
9 940


i - j _ ' _ _ ^ J. - -• ^ 	
Compu-
. ted in-
jection
range


r'
B
1
cm
8

-
16, 82
1 6, 82
16, 82
16, 82
16,50
16, 12
'-5, 07
14, 56
13, 96
15, 96


Measu-
red in-
jection
range


r
B

cm
-
9
- — — i
-
17, a
16, 5
15, 0
18, u
17,0
17,0
16,7
13, 0
16, 0
16,7


- - 	 1
Real
height
of
block


h
B

era
10
	

48
48
44
53
43
21
24
24
25
25


	 ^ 	 ! 	 j 	

-------
              H
'.5
Fig. 74. Cross-sections'of the rings obtained in the tests 10-15.
                         157

-------
                                                 &	L _
                    S-\	
                      -I
             :0
                                        U—"?	,
                              	V_i^U
                                                    i V
 <1
O '


-------
This discrepancy may be explained by the fact a part of the grout has run out
beyond the pressured layer, thus decreasing the injection time. In the expe-
riments 10,  12 and 13 the computed times were considerably shorter than
those determined during the experiments. It resulted from  different  technical
difficultues occurring in the model investigations. These results should not
be taken into consideration when a summary analysis is being done.  One can
draw a general conclusion that the computed times are,  approximately, consis-
tent with the measured ones.

The comparison of the volumes of the stabilized blocks indicates that
        v'
0.42 <^ — : — <^  1.07. In three  cases this  ratio is close to 1.0 (experi-
          B
ments  17,  18 and 19) . In all the experiments in which the grout of the 42
percent concentration has been applied (experiments 12,  13,  14, 15 and 16),
the measured volume is considerably greater than the computed one. It was
found that the concentrated grout being diluted,  undergoes the dilution itself,
thus increasing the volume of the stabilized soil. In those experiments in
which the volumes of blocks increased,  the volumes of their interiors decrea-
sed (Table 31 j . The ratio of the sum of the computed and measured volumes
of the stabilized  and  the diluted soil changes in the range of
         V'  +  V'
0.74  /   P    V_  /  1. 22. This means that the diluting  water constitutes
     <  VB+  vc   <
a component of the grout stabilizing the soil.

The ratio of the computed and measured length of the external radii varies
             /
            r
by o 87 /   ^   /"  !• 12, whereas the ratio of the heights changes  in the

            "~
range of 0. 57  /   B   S lt25-
              < ~<

The cross-sections of the stabilized blocks plotted in Figures 74 and 75 show
these differences.  As one can see from the cross -sections, the grout has
flowed down to the bottom of model in the experiments 10 and 11. It was cau-
sed  by too long gelation time  in relation to the injection time. In the experi-
ment  13,  the ring has been displaced in upper part of the block, while in the
experiments 14 and 1 5 in  the  lower part. The most successful,  under the
conditions of unconfined flow,  should be considered experiment 12,  during
which  the block has been displaced by water. Experiments 17-21 carried out
under the  pressured conditions of the  filt rations may be  considered as
successful ones,  since  the obtained block  shapes are close to the foreseen
cylindrical shape.

These investigations have demonstrated the possibility of obtaining  stabilized
soil block of the ring shape, through pumping the grout and next  displacing  it
                               159

-------
TABLE 31.  COMPARATIVE COEFFICIENTS OF INJECTION TIMES
           AND RINGS DIMENSIONS
Test
no»
-

1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1.7
18
19
20
21

t'
t .
i


2
0, 46
1, 24
0, 61
0, 31
0, 93
1, 27
0, 55
1, 69
0, 89
1, 04
1, 18
1, 25

V'B
VB
-

3
0, 95
0, 96
0, 42
0, 54
0, 62
0, 67
0..57
0, 90
1, 01
1,07
0, 55
0, 57

v'c
vc
-
- « -. _>
4
- - - — - - -
-
2, 86
2, 84
2, 86
2, 86
2, 86
1, 90
0, 86
1, 14
1, 22
1, 21
_. 	 j
r'
rB
-

5
.

0, 99
1, 02
1,12'
0, 93
0, 97
0, 95
0, 90
1, 12
0, 87
0, 96

h' B _ Lf
hB hB
-


.
-
0, 62
0, 62
0, 68
0, 57
0, 70
1, 00
1, 00
1, 25
1, 12
1, 00
_____._.., 	 a
v' v'
V. B + C
V + V
B C
-

7

-
0, 74
0, 91
1, 02
1, 0!)
0, 96
1,22 '
0, 93
1,07
0, 76
0. 81

                            160

-------
Fig. 76. Cross-section of the ring obtained during unconfinecl grout
        flow (test 12)
                       161

-------
Fig. 77.  Ring obtained during confined grout flow  (test 17j .
                             1 62

-------
Fig. 78.  Ring obtained during confined grout flow  (test 17 )
                              163

-------
Fig. 79. Ring obtained during confined grout flow  (test 20)
                          164

-------
by water from the same hole. The model investigations confirmed the prog-
noses made by means of computations. However, the influence of accidental
factors, such as perforation of the grout layer by the  displacing liquid and
a change of the block shape due  to the soil heterogeneity should be -taken
into account.  Displacement the  grout by water causes its partial wa
ce a part of the  grout stays in the soil pores entering into the reactu'<
the  displacing water. It may cause an unfavourable change of parameters of
the stabilized soil. This should be taken into consideration when selecting
the suitable grout compositions.

In the horizontal plate series, eight experiments have been carried out.
Table 32 presents data regarding the process of the experiments.  In  expe-
riment 22 the grout was pumped only through upper part of the filter.
The resin without  hardener was pumped through two lower parts.  In this case
the resin was used as the supporting liquid only. In the experiments the   resin
was applied to avoid the grout washout by the supporting liquid.
Because the resin had the same  density as the grout,  it was expected  this
would lessen the downward  flow  of the grout. In  experiment 23 the grout was
pumped through the central part  of the filter while the supporting liquid was
passed through only the lower part. This caused the penetration of the grout
into the empty upper  part and into the soil, thus creating the b}ock of the form
showed in 'Figure 80. In the remaining experiments 24-29, the grout was
pumped through the central part  of the filter, while the supporting liquid
flowed through upper and lower parts.  The brine of the density of the  grout
was applied in these experiments. The solution of the hydrochloric acid was
used in the experiments 28 and 29.  The purpose of this was to cause a  rapid
gelation of the grout on the  boundary grout solution, thereby creating the limi-
tation for spreading the grout.

The computed and measured volumes of the horizontal plate,  radii, and  thick-
nesses have been presented in Table 33.  Additionally, the  following indices
characterizing the block shape have been given: the ratio of the  block volume
to its  radius,  according to  measurements and computations
             /    V'
          .  a  _    B    as well as the rations of radius and lengths  to
                  rB
                      rP               r/
plate thicknesses h -  .       •  b' _     B
                     -~
To Table 34 the comparison of the computed and measured results has been
presented.  The comparison of the volumes gives the following values  •
          V'
0,41  /    B   / 1.03.  This means   > that the volumes of the stabilized
     <   VB   <
block are,  almost in all cases, greater than those computed on the basis oi
                                165

-------
TABLE 32.   RESULTS OF LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS - HORIZONTAL PLATES

Test
no.


1
22
23
24 ~
25
26
27

' 28

29

'•-..
Lenght of injection
veil
Upper
part
Lf
cm
2
16

16
16
16
16
I
.16

16


Middle
part
Lf
cm
3
8-
8'
8
8
.8
8

8

8


Lower
part
L
f
cm
4
16
16
16
16
16
16

16

16


	 	 	 —
Type
of
liquid


5
grout

resin
resin
resin
water +
NaCl
water +
NaCl
water +
NaCl
	
r 	 _UPP_
Pres-
sure
H
cm
6
60

70
70
70
60

57

57


Volume
V
3 n
cm
7
5000

8000
5000
9000
22000

7500

6500


Time
t
S
8
3000

3600 .
3600
3600
2700

2700

2400


'Rate of
1 cm
filter
lenght
q
cm /s
S
0, 104

0, 138
0, 080 .
0, 156
0, 509

0, IT'S

0, 302


^routing
Type
of
liquit]


10
resin
grout
grout
grout
grout
grout

grout

grout


Pres-
sure
H
cm
11
60
70
70
70
70
60

50

50


Volume
V
3
cm
12
6600
5000
6000
8000
3000
2900

2300

3250


Time
t
S
13
300U
3600
3600
3600
3600
2700

2700

2400


Rate of
1 cm
filter
lenght
q
2 .
cm /s
14
0, 270
0, 208
0, 208
U, 277
0, 104
0, 134 '

0, 106

0 353


Type
of
liquid


15
resin
resin
resin
resin
resin
water +
NaCl
water +
NaCl
water -I-
NaCl

	 I
Pres-
sure
H
	
cm
16
60
. 70
70
70
70
60

57

57

	
jower nart
Volume
V
"""cm3"""1
17
3400
15000
40UO
8000
7000
22000

7500

6500


Time
	 - - -
I
S
18
3000
3600
3600
3600
3600
2700

2700 '

2400


Rate of
1 cm
filter
lenght
q
cm /s
19
0, 270
0, 312
0, 068
0, 138
0, 121
0 509

0 173

0 302



-------
            22
23
            24
            26
Fig. 80. Cross-sections of the horizontal plates obtained in the
        tests 22-27.
                            167

-------
          28
29
Fig.  81.  Cross sections of the  horizontal plates obtained in the
         tests 28-29.
                        68

-------
TABLE  33.   DIMENSIONS OF HORIZONTAL PLATES

o
C!


B




i
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
	 	
"O
"3 -g


u ^
h'
B

cm
2
16
8
8
8
8
8
8
8




5 ""'
§ ^
h
B

cm
3
16
23
14
23
23
12
13, 5
9, 0

-a
S 0)
g. s
fi 3
o 1
u >
V
B
3
cm
4
14 :i;,"
14 286
17 143
22 857
8 571
8 286
6 571
9 286
	 	 	
-o
I S


s
V
B
3
cm
5
20 000
14 500
42 000
46 000
27 OUU
17 600
9 600
9 UOO



Q, bD
S ^
O [,
O

B

cm
6
16, 9
23, 8
26, 1
3U,2
18, 5
111, 2
16, 2
19, 2

' ,
i j

-' ,i


1!

i in
I
-d, 5
U, 0
'Mi. U
oil, U
'"."
'.'U, (1
19,5
21.5

v
' It





.i
1:111
11
U70
;uo
1-100
I 5 3 0
I :i.ill
liau
40
410
480

r
B
hB



b



10
1.28
0, 78
2, 14
1, 07
0, 80
1, (ili
1, 44
2, 38 ..
• 	
r B '
hB



b'



11
1, 05
2, 97
3,26
3, 77
2, 31
2, 27 ;
2, 02
2, 40
	 	

-------
TABLE 34,  COMPARATIVE COEFFICIENTS OF DIMENSIONS OF
           HORIZONTAL PLATES
T,-,r.4-
i est
no,
-
1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
i-.--._ .
	 	 _
V'
r>
VD

2
pj-.^---*---
0, 71
0, 99
0, 41
U, 50
0, 32
0,47
0, 68
1, 03
u._ 	 	
r'
r>
rB

3
0, 82
1, 32
0,87
1, 00
0, 93
0, 91
1, 20
0, 89

h'
B
"B
-
__-___--_-^«._
4
------ — I.----
1, 00
0, 34
0, 66
0, 28
0, 34
0, 66
0,59
0, 88

"•-""
a'

a
-
_.......-_-._.., —
5
0, 86
0, 74
0, 47
0, 49
0, 34
0, 51
0, 83
1,17
L-, 	 u 	
r 	 1
b'
|,
n

6
1,17
3, BO
1, 52
3, 52
2, 68
1,36
1, 40
1, 00
	 __. 	
                              1-70

-------
the grout quantity and the soil porosity. This can be explained by mixing of
the grout with the supporting liquid.

The ratio of the computed and measured radii changes in the range from

         r'
0,82 /  	B_ /  1,32,  while the ratios of the heights  thicknesses   amount
            Vi '
to 0. 28  /    B  /!_().  As can be seen, the values of the measured radii cor-
            hB

respond, approximately, to those computed.  However,  the thickness of plates
has changed considerably, as is reflected by the ratios -§-  and  -g— .

Analyzing the shapes of the plates  ^Figures 80 and 81 j  one can consider three
experiments (22, 28 and 29J  as fully successful.  The most successful is the
experiment 29,  which the ratio  rB   - 2. 37.
                               rB

In experiment 25, after having completed the pumping of the grout,  the additio-
nal 1000 cm3 of water has been pumped for the purpose of ringing the filter. It
caused displacement of the grout and creating of the ring. In experiment  27,
in the first phase of pumping,  the pressure of the  grout was greater than that
of the supporting liquid.  It caused the creating of a spherical bulb, which after
having adjusted the  pressures,  has been lifted on the outside, as it is shown
in Figure  80. In the experiment 24, the grout has  flowed in the  vicinity  of
the outer walls  of model as a result of excessive gelation time.

The investigations of the III series proved the possibility of making relatively
thin horizontal plates from one grouting hole.  A supporting liquid  should  be
pumped above and under the grouting plate being formed.  To obtain successful
results, the same pressures should be  maintained on the grout and supporting
liquids during pumping.  The best results  (experiments 28 and 29J  were obtai-
ned  by applying,  as the supporting liquid, the solution  of the hydrochloric acid
which accelerates the gelation on the surface confining  the spreading of the
grout.
                              - 171  -

-------
Fig. 82.  Horizontal plate obtained in the test 28.
                               - 172  -

-------
Fig. 83. Horizontal plate obtained in the test 28.
                                - . 173

-------
                                                   29
Fig. 84. Horizontal plate obtained in the test 29.
                                  - 174  -

-------
                         SECTION  XIII

                     FIELD  INVESTIGATIONS


PURPOSE  AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATIONS

Field investigations  were conducted to examine application of the stabilized
foundation under natural conditions .   Special attention  was paid to the methods
for constructing and sealing  the injection wells, selection of the grout com-
position,  selection of the grouting equipment, possibilities of installing verti-
cal curtains.

The field investigations were carried out on the experimental ground at Rynia,
near the Zegrze river reservoir.  The soils  of  the experimental ground  con-
sisted  of medium sand  of a  considerable  thickness .   Location in the  vicinity
of a great river reservoir  assured  a constant  level of ground water .  Topog-
raphy of the area allowed  investigations both  in watered  and  unwaterecl
soils .

Before proceeding with the  grouting,  the following parameters were determi-
ned : depth of water table below the ground surface, air temperature in the
well at the injection  depth  assuming that it is equal to the soil temperature
and moisture capacity of the soil. For determining the moisture capacity,
a fixed quantity  of water was pumped into the  hole   (80  or  100 litresj while
measuring  simultaneously  the  pressure  and pumping time.  The  pressure
value was assumed  the same as that of the grout  pumping (Tables 35 and 36)
The laboratory  investigations of the soil samples examined proved that  the
soils on the experimental ground  are characterized by  a great  homogeneity.
In this  connection,  the  effective  porosity  was assumed as  constant n =0.35.

DESCRIPTION OF FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

Two methods for constructing the injection well were applied in the experi-
ments : driving  the  well by the vibrating  hammer  (Figure 85J  and by jetting
the well in  the  casing  pipe (Figure  86)  .

Driving the well by the vibrating  hammer were  applied in  the  experiments
T1-T5  and  in  T17-T20.  In all  the remaining experiments  the  method of
installing  the wells was by  jetting.
                                  175

-------
        1   vibrating hammer
        2.   three - footed table

        3.  injection  well


Fig. 85  Vibrohammering the injection well
                    ••'•0\ I          1   I    '
                    ;A'ww,vv*wv.^ww«'Ailw*w.*^
-------
The method of jetting proved better for these soils  rather than  driving  the
well.  Driving the well by means of vibration  resulted  in a greater diame-
ter of the hole in the unsaturated soil than that for the pipe. Under  such
conditions the grout penetrates  to  the chink between  the pipe and the soil,
thus increasing  the active length  of the filter  and creating channels  for
flow of the  grout to the soil surface.  In the  soils situated below the water
table, the sand clung  closely  to the well hole.  In watered and  unwatered
soils, fissures may remain.  In  field investigations  the chink was filled
up with sand .  To obtain better  effects, great  quantities of water  were
poured into the chink to produce the  results  similar to those in the satu-
rated  soil.  In some experiments  (for example T4J  , the well  was dug  up
to the  upper edge of the filter (0.4m below the ground surface) , and next, by
layer,  the soil was compacted exactly  by the  punner .  Thus, a good  sea-
ling has been  obtained, but this  procedure  takes much time and is difficult
for application  with  a  filter of great depth.

The method of jetting the injection  well gave good  results both in  watered
and unwatered  soils  because it  caused the self-sealing  of the well  with
the sand  saturated by water pumped during  the jetting operation. However,
with a great pumping  of the grout, there is  a possibility of hydraulic bre-
aking  of the soil along the shortest way of pressure  relief.  To  avoid
this, the  ground  surface was sealed around the well with grout after dri-
ving the well (Figure 87j .  This Figure presents  a scheme of the grout
penetration, where there is a fissure  around the well, in the  over - and
under - filtrated  zone .
                     P.T
                                  I
                        1  seal
                        2 . filter
                        3 . penetration zone
                        4 . fissure
                Fig. 87  Surface sealing for the grouting
                         in unsaturated soils
                                177

-------
Care must be exercised  in applying pressures to prevent blowing off  the
seal  (l) -   This actually happened in experiments  T6, T7 and  Til. A good
joint of the  seal with the injection  well is necessary. In experiments  T8
and T16 the sealing was performed from the grout having a gelation time
of three hours .  There was no outflow during the grouting .

Two  different sets of  equipment were used in the field investigations . Set no .
1 is presented in  Figure 88.  It consists  of the grouting  tank of  100 liters
volume.  The tank is placed on the  platform, the height  of which can be
changed depending upon the required  pressure  of pumping .  The grouting
tank is joined by an elastic hose with the well end  standing above the ground
surface.  Tanks for resin and for  hardener are placed separately upon the
ground . The grout components are pumped into the grouting tank where they
are mixed  together .  In the set no . 2  (Figure 89J  a pump for pumping the
grout under the  determined pressure  has been used.   The suction  side of
the pump hose was immersed  in the grouting tank to which the grout com-
ponents were fed by gravity  from resin  and  hardener tanks .  A   reducing
valve was located at the outlet of the pump for pressure  control. The in-
jection wells were prepared from  perforated parts of pipes of 0.5 or 1 .5m
length  as well as from unperforated  pipes joined  with   filter parts  with
length  of 1.0m.   It enabled the suitable  constructions of the wells under
various water soil conditions .

Knowing  the parameters of the soil, the  following data were computed: the
volume of the grout for a block of the required dimensions  the expected
height  and radius  of the block,  and an  approximate  time of pumping for the
assumed pumping  pressure  and the grout viscosity. On this basis a suitable
composition of the grout, with the  required   gelation time was selected .
After some initial  experiments, it was learned  that  a number of unexpected
circumstances  should be taken into consideration,  since they may cause  an
interruption  during the grout pumping. Too short a  gelation time may  cause
binding of the  grout before  introducing the whole  quantity into the ground .
For these studies, the gelation  time was  adjusted  with   a great time reserve,
for instance, for 30 minutes  of pumping,  the gelation time of 150 minutes
was used .  During the  experiments the grout concentration  was adjusted so
that  the viscosity  would be the lowest possible .  In all the experiments  the
viscosity amounted  to approximately  ScP,.--,  The composition  of  the grout
is presented  in Table  25 .

The  grout was pumped into the soil by increments .  This procedure  became
necessary  because the air temperature  was higher  than the soil tempera-
ture resulting in quicker  gelation  of the grout. During the field tests, grout
components  were mixed only  after having pumped  the   precedent portion.
The volume of each portion  was determined   under   assumption  that it cannot
stay in the injection tank longer than  2/3 of the  gelation time .  In this  way
                                   178

-------
the viscosity of the grout pumped into the soil amounted to  M1 = 5cP, thus
enabling the application of the pattern A  (Section  Xl) for  computation
of the injection  times .

Grout was injected  into the soil, followed by application of  water  through
the  same  well.  The purpose  was to obtain  a ring  structure.  The  water
was poured into the empty  grouting  tank, and next pumped  into the  soil
under the  determined  pressure.

Thirty-four  (34J  experiments were attempted,  of which 16 were in unsa-
turated  soil  (Tl-Tie) .,  and 18 in  saturated soil  (T17-T34) .  Thirty-two
 (_32) bulbs and 2  rings were  made.  Five (s)  blocks  (T1-T5J  were  cons-
tructed  as single blocks.  Eleven  (ll) bulbs were constructed  to  form
a vertical curtin  (T6-T16)  .  Eighteen  (is) bulbs  (T17-T34)  were joined
together in such manner that  they  formed a basin,  of which 12 bulbs  (T17-
T28) constituted  the horizontal  walls,  and  6  bulbs (T29-T34) the  bottom
plate .

The  investigations on aging of the grout were conducted, as described in the
Section  VIII, on the  blocks on the  experimental ground .

The first four experiments  (T1-T4J  cover the single bulbs. All data concer-
ning the  grouting procedures  are  given in Table  35 .  The  Table contains
data regarding the applied grout mixture  numbers  of compositions   accor-
ding to Table  25, soil conditions,  well dimensions, method for  driving and
sealing  the well and procedure  for the  grouting . In the last column,  the
ratio  of the computed time  (ti)  according  to the Section  XI, to the  measu-
red one  (ti)  has  been given. In all  the  experiments the short  filters  of
0.5m  length  were used.  They  were inserted in a  way that upper edge  of
the filter  was 0.5m  below the ground  surface.  The wells were  driven by
means of a vibration  hammer.  In experiment T4, the additional compaction
of the soil layer above the  filter  was accomplished . The  shapes  of  bulbs
are shown in  drawings (Figures 90 and 92j as well  as in photos (Figures
91 and  93)  .  These  Figures  demonstrate  clearly the influence of  the
soil  compaction  in the vicinity  of the pipe above  the filter on the bulb shape
Due  to the lack  of compaction   experiment  T1-T3  , a  deformation  of  the
bulb  occurred,  caused  by the grout penetrating along the pipe.  It  did not
occur when the soil was compacted  (Figure 92j .  The results of the  field
investigations  coincide very  well  with those  of the laboratory investigations .
It is  worth noting  that in the  field investigations, that the  bulbs had  almost
ideal axial symmetry.  This was due to the  homogeneity  of sands .

The  comparison  of  the computed  times with those  measured  indicates
that   0.55 <^ _ - _  ^ 0.93.  During  grouting, air accumulation  occurred

and stopped  the pumps resulting in a much more variable ti .  In spite of
                                  179

-------
                                1 .  mixer
                                2 .  tank for resin
                                3.  tank for hardener
                                4 .  platform
                                5 .  seal
                                6 .  injection well
 Fig .  88 Set 1  of the grouting  equipment
©
rJs^W^ft'&AkJ'i'
-*—
t
]=*
7'-Wi
1
c
_l

~f M-
~^ _l
CO
\ r .1 ....... i f,~— — ' Ij

^=$?hh -^ "xT
I Cz] ^ — ^^~"



1 . injection pump
2 . mixer
3 . tank for resin
4. tank for hardener
5 . valve and manometer
6 . injection well
7 . seal
Fig.89  Set 2 of the grouting equipment
                     180

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
       1 .  real shape

       2 . theoretical shape
Fig .90  Cross- section of the bulb
        injected  in unsaturated
        soil  (tests  T 1  T
               182

-------
                                         T1  T3
Fig.91 The bulb injected in unsaturated soil (tests Tl - T3j
                  183

-------
        1 .  real shape
        2 .  theoretical  shape
        3 .  consolidated  soil
Fig.92  Cross-section of the bulb
        injected  in  unsaturated
        soil  (test T4)
            184

-------
                                       T4
Fig.93  The bulb injected in unsaturated soil
        (test T4) .
               185

-------
  P.T.
Fig.94  Cross-section  of the ring
        injected in unsaturated soil
         (test T5 ) .
          186

-------
                                       T5
Fig.95 The ring injected in unsaturated soil
        (test T 5) .
               187

-------
Fig.96  Cross-section of the ring injected
        in unsaturated  soil (test T 15 J .
              188

-------
Fig.97  The ring injected in unsaturated
        soil  (test T is) .
             189

-------
this  difference the results of the experiments should be considered as fully
satisfactory.  The results  support the conclusion  drawn  on the basis of the
laboratory  investigations that the projected injection  time should contain
a considerable reserve in  comparison  with the computed  time . This allows
coping with  unforeseen difficulties  which may  occur during the grouting
under  natural conditions .

In the experiment  T5,  a single ring has  been formed .  Ninety (90J litres
of grout and  80 litres  of water were used .  The block  shape is illustrated
in (Figure  94J  and  in photo  (Figure  95 j . The result  of the field  in-
vestigations  coincides  closely with the  results of the investigations  in Sec-
tion  XII  -   experiment 16.  In each case a typical  bulb  diluted  with water
has been obtained . Such a bulb  is formed  when the block  radius is relati-
vely  great in comparison with  filter length.  In experiment 15,  the  ring
was by means of  1.5m filter (^Figures  96  and 97J  . The field  investiga-
tions  verified the  possibility of forming  a ring from one injection  hole-

Construction of a vertical curtain was attempted by  joining 10 piles  bulbs
and 1 ring  (Figure 98 j .  The curtain was made in the shape of a horseshoe
to enable digging  it up from one side. The data  regarding  the  grouting in
the  particular  holes  have been  compiled in  Table 35 .  One and  one-half
 (l.5  my filtres  were used in  all the  wells with  upper edge being  0.6m
below the ground surface.  Experiments  T10  and Til  should be considered
as unsuccessful, since  in experiments T10  and the  injection  was  stopped
due  to clogging  of the filter,  and in experiment  Til the grout  flowed  up
the  filter pipe in spite of the seal.  The grouting  of the remaining  bulbs fol-
lowed  expectations .  The ratio of the  computed  and measured  times changed
in the range  of

                 1.35.   Extending  the  real  injection time was necessary

due to the  increase of resistance of penetrations in the vicinity of the  exis-
ting  stabilized soil blocks . After partially uncovering the  curtain from one
side,  it was  revealed  that, in almost  all the cases,  the grout flowed upward
to the surface sealing, creating  irregular cones.  As the depth  increases,
the  diameters of the stabilized blocks increase  and their volumes,  in  all
cases, prove to be greater  than the planned  ones. The uncovered  curtain
has been shown  schematically in (Figure 99J and in photos  in  (Figures  100
and lOl).  The blocks  were  excavated  and  washed   by means of a strong
water jet.   Inspection  revealed blocks T6, T7,  T8, T9,T15,  and  T16 to
form  compact monoliths one to one and one-half   \1 1 .5j  meters  below
the ground.  Block  T10 was  connected to  adjacent blocks  only on the lower
portions .
                                 190

-------
CD
                  Fig .98  Location of the blocks in vertical curtain

-------
pj.   T6
Fig.99  Cross-section of the vertical curtain
                         192

-------
                                *T6TI4
Fig. 100 A part of the vertical curtain (tests T 6 - T 14)
                    193

-------
                                              T10T16
Fig. 101 A pant of the vertical curtain  (tests  T10, T15, Tie)
                        194

-------
                          0.8rn
Fig. 102 Scheme of the basin





                       195

-------
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
       . 1 . real shape
       2 . theoretical shape
       3 . seal
       4. groundwater level
Fig .103  Cross-section of the blocks obtained
         in the tests  T17 - T20
         (vibrohammered  injection  wellj
                197

-------
    P.T.
         1 . real shape
         2 . theoretical shape
         3 . seal
         4 . groimdwater level


Fig. 104  Cross-section of the blocks
         obtained  in the tests T 21 - T 28
         (the  jetted  injection welly
                   198

-------
The experiments  have proved  the  possibility  of forming  continuous, verti-
cal curtains . It should be noticed however, that the continuity of the curtain
can only be obtained on 1.0m depths  and lower in subsurface. Above  this
depth voids  occurred  which  were undesireable  for the purpose of  this
study.

Studies  on grouting below the ground water surface  revealed   stabilized
objects, such  as a basin,  could be made.  One is shown in  Figure  102
having  an external  diameter  of 3.80m,  bottom level approximately 0.70m
below ground  surface,  and 0.20m below ground water level. All the para-
meters  characterizing  these experiments are given  in Tabele 36 .  In  Figure
103 the shape  of blocks formed by means of  driving  the filters  T  17  T 20
is shown schematically. Figure 104 illustrates the shape  of blocks created
by jetting the  filters  (T21-T28J . The blocks forming the basin have been
retained  in place for  studies  on aging  of the grout in  saturated soil conditions.
Field  investigations  of injection grouting  clearly  indicated  the  possibility
of soil  stabilization in the subsurface  saturated zones .
                                199

-------
                             SECTION  XIV


                             REFERENCES
 1 . R6g,  S., A .Juraszek. Wybrane zagadnienia ochrony 6rodowiska natu-
    ralnego cziowieka /Selected Problems of the Environmental Protection/.
    Sprawozdanie dla IMGW, Warszawa, 1973.
 2. Prospekt. Injektionsmittel AM-9, Am.Cyanamid Co, 1968.

 3. Technical Date Scheet. Halliburton Pressure Grouting Service, Halli-
    burton Co .

 4. Goncharova,  L.V., R .S .Ziangirov .  Opyt sozdaniya prochnykh protivfil-
    trationnykh  ekranov iz peskov ukreplennykh krabamidnoy  smoloy
    /Studies on Durable  Counterfiltration Curtains of Sands Strengthened
    by Carbamide Resin/. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta .  Seriya  TV -
    Geologiya, No  6:65-79,  1965.

 5. Goncharova,  L.V.Osnovy isskustvennogo uplotnenya gruntov /Foun-
    dations of Artificial Soil  Hardening/. Izdat M ,G .U . Moskva, 1972 .

 6. MMkowski, W.,E.Gliwa. Zastosowanie Iignochrom6w do stabilizowa-
    nia g6rotworu /Application of Lignochromes  to Stabilization of Geologic
    Formation/.  PraceGIG, Komunikat 544, Katowice,  1972.

 7. Kockert, W.  Polymere als  Injektionsmittel. Plaste und  Kautschuk 10:
    759-761,  1971.

 8. Mitchell, J..K. Innovations  in Ground Stabilization.  Illinois Section
    A.S.C.E.  1972. Chicago Soil Mechanics  Lecture.Series,  Innovation
    in Foundation Construction, March  1, 1972.

 9. Technical Date Scheet. Soil  Limits-for Grout Injectivity, Halliburton Co.
10, Law tort, H.C. Selective Plugging by Chemical Methods . The Oil Weekly,
    Vol. 12, No  12: 46-54,-'  1947 .
'11' R/hanitsin, B .A . Fiziko-khimicheskiye  sposoby zakreplenya gruntov
    /Physico-Chemical Methods for Soil Hardening/, dsnovaniya Funda-
    menty i Mekhanika Gruntov  5:14-16,  1967.

                                    200

-------
12. Korzhenko,  L.I., E . I. Malyukov,  A.F.Polak. Zakreplenye grunta
    mochevino-formaldegidnoy smoloy M-60 v uslovyakh Bashkiria
    /Soil Strengthening  by Means of  M-60 Urea-Formaldehyde Resin
    in Bashkirya/. Materialy  k VI Vsesoyuznomu Soveshchaniyu po
    zakreplenyu  i uplotnenyu gruntov, Izdat M .G -U .: 424-428, 1968.

13, Davidov V .V . Ukreplenye  gornykh porod smoloy MFS-7 /Soil Stren-
    gthening by Means of MFS-7 Resin/. Materialy k VI Vsesoyuznomu
    Soveshchanyu po zakreplenyu i uplotnenyu gruntov ,  Izdat  M.G.IT.:
    410-411, 1968.

14. Pashkov, D.N., P .G .Kalashnik,  V.M.Kozin. Primenenye  sintetiche-
    skikh Binol v shakhtnom stroitelstve /Application of Synthetic Resins
    in Mining Constructions/. Plasticheske  massy 8:60-61, 1971.

15. Davidov, V .V . O prinienenyi nekotorykh smol dla zakreplenya gor-
    nykh porod /Application  of Some  Resins to Strengthening  of Soils/.
    Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Soveshchanya  po osvoyenyu mestorozhdeniy
    v slozhnykh usloviyakh, Izdat Nedra: 30-39,  1969.

16. Praca zbiorowa.  Zwalczanie zagrozen wodnych na przykladzie jednej
    z kopaln G6rno£l§skiego Zagtfbia W^glowego /Fighting Against Water
    Hazard  in a  Coal-Mine of the G6rnosl§skie Zaglfbie W^glowe/.
    PraceG.I.G, Komunikat  No 597, Katowice ,  1973.

17. Borodzirlska, E.  Zywica mocznikowa  116 /Urea Resin 116/. Komuni-
    kat I,C.H.P., No 4/74, Warszawa, 1974.

18, Gresa,  J .Pouzitie  organickych makromolekulovych hmot pre iniekcne
    ciele /Application of Organic Macromolecular Compounds for Grouting
    Purposes/.  Iniekcne clony v vodnom stavitelstve  a vystavba  podzem-
    nych stien, 1 . Sbornik prispevkov:  263-280,  1968.

19. Technical Date Scheet. Herculox, Halliburton Co.
                                          i
20. Ramos, J,, H .C .McLoughlin. Method of Sealing or Consolidating
    Earthen Formation. Pa.  USA, 3176471,  1965.

21, Koch, R ,R ., J.Ramos. Method of Consolidating Sands, Earthen For-
    mation and the Like . Pat. USA . 3237691,  1966.

22, Ziangirov, R.S., L .V .Goncharova , Umenshenye  vodopronikaemosti
    peskov karbamidnoy smoloy /Lowering of Water Permeability by Means
    Of Carbamide Resin/. Voprosy Inzhenernoy Geologii i Gruntovedenya,
    Izdat M.G .U,: 344-350,  1963.

                                  201              ;

-------
23, Voronkevich, S.D., E .N .Ogrodnikova . Issledovanye uprochnenyn
    peskov  karbamidnymi smolami /Studies on Sand Stabilization by Means
    of Carbamide Resins/. Voprosy Inzhenernoy  Geologii i Gruntovedenya,
    Izdat M.G.U.: 349-359,  1968.

24, Rzhanitsin, B .A ., N .A .Bleskina . Zakreplenye  peschatogo  grunta
    karbamidnoy  srnoloy  /Strengthening of Sand  Soil by Means of Carbami-
    de Resin/. Isskustvennoe zakreplenye gruntov, Sbornik 39: 5-10,1960.

25, Tchaykova, E .S . O stoykosti peska zakreplennogo karbamidnoy smoloy
   • v agresnivnykh sredakli  /Durability of Sand Stabilized by  Carbamide
    Resin in Aggresive  Media/.  Osnovanya, fundamenty  i pozemnye sooruz-
    henya.  Sbornik trudov No  39:131-135,   1970.

26. Stepanyan, V .E ., M .A .Astryan, A .A .Agaronyan . Primenenye polin>e-
    rov povyshaemykh  prochnost i vodopronikaemost gruntov /Applicn tion
    of Polymers Raisning Strength and Water Permeability of Soils/. Gitro-
    tekhnika i melyoratsia 2:27-35, 1962.

27. Falkiewicz, A., M .Grochowski . Sposob wytwarzania s'rodka przeznn-
    czonego do stabilizacji grunt6w /Method of Production of a Soil Sta-
    bilizing Agent/. Pat.  PRL.  65519,  1972.

28. Lunyov, L ., G.Panteleev. N.Borodin, L.Hartmann, P.Butther, V .Oa-
    vidov,  N .Brodkina, .S .Suschenkova . Isolier - und Stabilisierungsmittel
    fuer Grundungen, Dichtungsschuetzen u.a. inbesbndere Grundflaechen
    zur Haufenlaugung  von Eizen in alkalischen Medi'en . Pat.GDR,  94151,
    1972.

29. Krahl  M. Verfahren zur Verfestigung von Boden und  zur Abdichtung
    poroeser Bauwerke. Pat. GFR . 1050276,  1969.

30. Wirpsza Z., J .Brzezinski. Aminoplasty /Aminoresins/.  WNT1, Wnr-
    szawa  , 1970 .

31, Rabek  T.  Teoretyczne podstawy syntezy polielektrolitow i wymienia-
    czy jono\vych /Theoritical Ground for Synthesis of Polyeletrolytes and
    Ion Exchangers/.  PWN, Warszawa, 1960.

32. Wirpsza Z,  Chemizm kondensacji przemyslowych zywic mocznikowo-
    formaldehydowych  /Chemism of Condensation of  Indvistrial  Urea -
   1 Formaldehyde Resins/. Przemysi Chemiczny 37: 38-43, 1958.

                                  202

-------
33 t  Wirpsza Z. Chemizm kondensacji przemysicnvych zywic mocznikowo-
    formaldehydowych/Chemism  of Condensation of Industrial Urea-
    Formaldehyde Resins/ .  Sprawozdanie I .T .S .  Nr 71/62. Warszawa,
    1962,

34.  Depczyriska-Krogulec E., N.Krogulec.  Katalog tworzyw sztucznych
    /Cataloque of Plastics/, Vol.  1, WKC, Warszawa, 1973.

35.  Wirpsza Z .  Katalizatory kwasowe do utwardzania aminoplast6w/Ancid
    Catalyzers for Hardening of Aminoresins/. Polimery 10: 519-524,
    1965.

36.  Wirpsza Z. Ditto. Part. Two. Polimery 14:152-156, 1969.

37.  Walker.I.F.  Formaldehyde, Reinhold Publ. Corp.,  New York, 19G4.

38.  Chuvelev, V.K.  O sinereze  zhela karbamidnoy  smoloy v kapitarno-
    porovom prostranstve  /Syneresis of Carbamide Resin Gel in Capillary
    Medium/. Materialy  k  VI Vsesoyuznomu vSoveshchenyu po zakreple-
    nyu  i uplotn,enyu  gruntov,  Izdat M .G .U .: 404-405 ,  1968.

39.  Davidov  V .V ., N.E.Og'neva.  O primenenii melamino-mochevino-for-
    maldegidnoy  smoly  modifitsirovannoy  akriloamidom dla  ukreplenya
    obvodnennykh peskov  /Application of Melamine-Urea-Formaldehyde
    Resin Modified by  Acryloamide to Strengthening of Watered  Sands/.
    Materialy IV  Vsesoyuznogo Soveshchanya po zakreplenyu i uplotnenyu
    gruntov, Izdat G .P.I.: 70-72,  1974.

40.  Chuprunov  G., G. El kin. Zakreplenye  peskov rastvorami smol /Stren-
    gthening of Sands  by Resin Solutions/. Metrostroy 4:21-22, 1968.

41.  Kozin V.M., N .1 .Gayvoronskaya, V .1 .Krikunova,  S.M. Chumachenko .
    Sostav dla zakreplenya gruntov /Medium for Hardening  of  Soils/. Tat.
    USSR.  248549,  1969.

42.  Praca zbiorowa. Analiza polimer6w  syntetycznych /Analysis of Syn-.
    thetic Polymers.  Collective Work/.  WNT, Warszawa, 1971.

43.  Hrynkiewicz R.,  H . Wielog6rska .  Oznaczanie formaldehydu w po-
    wietrzu atmosferycznym  /Determination of Formaldehyde in the
    Atmospheric Air/. Sprawozdanie IMGW, Nr  252.2.04, Warszawa 1974

44.  Putilova I. Cwiczenia laboratoryjne  z chemii koloid6w /Laboratory
    Exercises  in Colloid  Chemistry/. P,WN,  Warszawa  1955.

                                  203

-------
45, F.Bocliever,  I .V .Garmonov,  A.B.Lebedev,  V . M .Shestakov .  Osnovy
    gidrogeologicheskykh raschetov /Bases of hydrogeological countings/,
    Izdat. Nedra, Moskwa, 1969.

46. I.E.Zhernov, V .M .Shestakov . Moclelirovanye filtratii podzemnykh
    vod /Modeling of underground water flow/. Izdat. Nedra,  Moskwa,
     1971,
                                 204

-------
                             SECTION  XV

                            BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adamovich A .N., W.D .Kollunov . Cementacya osnovaniy gidrosoruzhenij .
   /Cement grouting of hydraulic constructions foundations/, Izdat . Energya,
   Moskwa  1964.

Cambefort II. Injections des Sols. Eyrolles, Paris, 1964.

Detin V .F . Opytnye raboty v proizvodstvennych uslovyakh po inekcyi  nes-
   vyazanykh  gruntov  smolamy na osnove fenolospyrtov y  summarnykh
   slancevykh  fenolov /Research on loose soil injection with phenols
   resins carried out in the practical conditions /Izvestya Vsesoyuzmnvo
   Nauchno-Issledovatelskovo Instituta Gidrotekhriiki, T.94,  1970.

Detin V .F ., A .N .Adamovich .  Laboratornye issledovanya po zakreplenyu
   peschatykh  gruntov smolamy na osnove fenolospyrtov y  summarnykh
   slancevykh fe noloy  /Laboratory research on sandy  grounds grouting
   by means of ph.ends  resins .  /Izvestya Vsesoyuznovo Nauchno-Isslrdo-
   vatelskovo Instituta  Gidrotekhniki, T.94,  1970.

Erikson H.B .  Strenghtening  rock by injection of chemical grout. Journal
   of the  soil Mechanics and Foundations Division ASCF .

Ibragimov M .J .  Mekhanizacya rabot po  khimicheskomu  zakreplenyju
   gruntov. /Mechanization of chemical  grouting of the soils/ .Materially
   soveschanya po  zakreplenyu i uplotnenyu  gruntov. Tbilisi  1964.

Karol R .H .  Chemical  grouting technology, Journal of the Soil Mechanics
   and  Foundations Division A SCE, January  1968.

Karol R .IT.  Symposium on grouting: Grouting in flowing water and strnti-
   fied  deposits .Journal of the Soil Mechanic  and Foundations Division
   ASCE, April  1961 ,
               ^
Lupiac L., H.Navarro, F .Ottman, J .Bosse . Acces et intercommunications
   de la Station ,"Auber" /Phase V/.Traitement confortatif  des  sables
   de Beauchamp par injection de gols de silice.

                                   205

-------
       APPENDIX   A





PRINTOUTS  OF PROGRAMS




FOR COMPUTATIONS




OF  INJECTION
         206

-------
]0 SELECT PRINT 005
70 REM INJECTION - PATTERN. Al
10 REM COMPUTING nrr,  FLOW TIME OF THE GROUT
40 DIM T(.ioo),R(ioo),q(ioo),A$2,Pi$3
.50 INPUT "GIVE TUE UNIT OF LENCTU",A$
60 INPUT "GIVE TUF UNIT OF TTMF,",B!;!
70 PRINT "GIVE THH FOLLOWING DATA"
RO PPJ.TIT- " II - OVFRPRESSURF, TNTRODUCINO Tjir  TROUT"
90 PRINT " R - FXTKRNAL RADT.UP"
1.00 PRINT "RO - RADIUS  OF INJECTION UOT.F,"
110 TRINT "KO - COF,wFICir,UT OF T'F.RW.AP.T.LI'T'V  FOR TJIP TJOUID"
17.0 PRINT "     PRECEDING 'HIE CROUT"
130 PRINT "KE - COEFFICIENT OF PERMEATU.LTTV  ^OR THE CROUT"
140 PRINT " E - COEFFICIENT OF THE flOIL PORO'UTV"
150 PRINT "N - OUANTTTY OF COMPUTATION"
IfiO IWUT "l!,R,RO,KO,KE,E,N"fU,R,Rl,K,K.l ,F,N
170 TJ^IMT "HIVE SUCCESSIVELY TUE VALUES OF RADiur;"
IflO FOR T=ITQ N
1^0 PRINTUSINC, 200,1
200 %R(///'//)
210 INPUT R(I)
220 NEXT I
 250 A1-R.1
    VOR T.m.l'i'o  M
    NEXT I
 3')0 SELECT PRINT 211
 310 PRINT "INJECTION - PATTERN Al"
 320 ^RINT
 330 PRINT "COMMUTING THE FLOW TIME  OF  THE CROUT"
 340 PRINT
 350 PRINTUSINC,  410,U,A$
                                    207

-------
360 PRTW'USTNO  /!20,R,A.$
370 T'RTIlTUSTNr,  A30,n],A$
inn PRTNTHSTNC  /I/IO,K,A$,?J$
390 PPTNTUSriO  A50.K.1 ,A$,n$
400 PRTNTUS1NO  4GO,E
410 %   i! «  /'///////'.//// ////
/i7.0 %;•  R "  ///////'//.//// ///'
A30 %  ' RO-  /////////'.//// ////
A/,0 %   KW=  //.///'////! !  I!  //////'////
/i50 %   KT=  //,////////! I  M_ «///////
A60 %   N -  //.////«
470 PRINT
AP,0 PRINT "      R                T(R)        0/M"
490 PRT.NT11ST.NO  500,  A$,R$ , A$ ,B$
500 %      [/'f'l            [//////]     [////?.//////']
310 FOR T=lTrt N
3?.0 •PRTNTUSTNC  540,  R (I) ,T(T) ,Q(T.)
  JO NIWT  I
'540 %/'///'////, ////   ////////////////////. ////    //. ///////'!  ! ! !
550 END
                                          208

-------
1.0 SELECT T>RT.NT 005                        .  ~"
20 REM INJECTION PATTERN A2
30 KEM COMPUTING THE INJECTION  RANGE
40 DIM T(100),R(100),Q(10n),A$2,P,$3
50 INPUT "GIVE THE UNIT OF LENGTH", A$
60 INPUT "GIVE THE TTNIT OF TI.ME",P>$
70 "HINT "GIVE THE FOLLOWING  DATA"
80 PRINT " II - OVERPRESSURE INTRODUCING THE GROUT"
90 PRINT " R - EXTERNAL RADIUS"
100 PRINT "RO - RADIUS OF INJECTION UOLE"
.130 PRINT "KO - COEFFICIENT OF  r-RRMEAniLITY FOR TUF LTOUTD"
120 PRINT "     PRECEDING THE GROUT"
130 I'RINT "KE - COEFFICIENT OF  PERMEABILITY FOR THE GROUT"
1AO VRINT " E - COEFFICIENT OF  TUE SOIL
1.50 "PINT " ;j - OUANTITY OF COMPUTATIONS"
jr>n TNPUT "u,R,Rn,KO,KK,E,N",n,R,Ri ,T:,KI,F,N
1.70 PRINT 'GIVE SUCCESSIVELY THE TIME VALUES"
1FO FOR T=ITO N
190 I'RINTUSING 200,1
200 7!T(W)
?10 INPUT T(I)
22.0 NEXT I
230 A2=LOG (R) -K*LOG (R.I ) /Kl
250 A.1=R1 !2''--0.5
260 ])=, 00001
27H FOR I=l'ro N
280 R2=(R-Ri)/2
2.90 P=R2.
300 T=I;/ (K*]|) * (p i 2* . 5* (A7>A3* (LOG (P) - . 5) ) -Al )
310 IF AnS((T-T(l))/T(l)) [D THEN 380
    IF
    ^=P
 350 GOTO J10
                                   209

-------
360 P-P+R2
370 GOTO 300
380 R(T)=P
390
400
410 SELECT PRINT 211                      '
420 PRTHT "INJECTION  - PATTERN  A2"
/i 30 PRINT
440 PRINT "COMPUTING  THE INJECTION RANGE"
A 50 PRINT
460 PRINTUSTNG 57.0,11,A$
470 PRTNTUP.TNO 530,R,A$
400 PRTNTUPTNf! VtO,Rl,A$
A»0 PRITITl'SINH 550,K,A$,n$
500 PRTNTUSINO 560,.K] ,A$,P$
530 PRTNTUSinc 570,E
520 7,' 11 -  /'///////'.////  ////
530 %  R =  /////////'.////  ////
5/.0 %  RO-  /,'////////,////  ////
550 ?!  KW=  //,/////'//!!!! /'/////////
560 %  KI=  //./////'/'111! /'////////'
570 %  N -  //,////////
5RO PRINT
590 PRINT "             T           R(T)     _    Q/?t"
600 PRTNTUHTNG 610,0$ ,A$ ,A$,11$
6.10       %           [//////]         [////]    '  [////2////'/'
620 FOR I«1TO N
630 PRItmTST.Nr, 650,T(T),R(I),0(I)
6AO NEXT I
650       %//////////////////////, ////   ////////////, ///////'     //, //W M
660 END
                                       210

-------
1 0 SELECT PRINT 005
 20 REM INJECTION - PATTERN  Bl  (BULB)
 30 DIM K(.100),T(]00),R(100),Q(]00),A$2,B$3
 40 IN^UT "GIVE THE UNIT OF  LENGTH", A$
 50 INPUT "GIVE THE WIT OF  TIME",B$
 60 PRINT "GIVE THE FOLLOWING DATA"
 70 PRINT " H - OVERPRESSURE INTRODUCING  THE  GROUT"
 ,10 PRINT " R - EXTERNAL RADIUS"
 90 PRINT "RO - RADIUS OF  INJECTION HOLE"
 100 PRINT "KO - COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY  FOR TUE LIQUID"
 110 PRINT "     PRECEDING TJ-1F  GROUT"
 120 PRINT " E - COEFFICIENT OF THE SOIL  POROSIT^"
 .1 30 PRINT " M - QUANTITY  OF COMPUTATIONS"
 l/iO INPUT lH,R,RO,KO,E,N",H,R,Rl,^fE,N
 150 PRINT "GIVE THE TIME  STEP  AND COEFFICIENT  OF PERMEABILITY"
 160 PRINT "FOR THE GROUT"
 170 FOR I=1TO N
 1P.O PRINTUST.NG .190,1,1
 190 %T(W), K(W)
 200 INPUT T(I),K(I)
 210 NEXT I
 220 02=2*H*K/LOG(R/R1)
 230 V2-0
 240 FOR I=1TO N
 250 01=02
 260 03=^2
 270 o«,5*(Ql-f-Q2)
 280 V=Q*T(T.)
 290 V1=V2+V
 300 R2«SQROn./T?+R] !2)
 310 02=2*n/(LOG(R2/R.1)/K(l)+T,OC(P/R2)/K)
 320 IF ABS((Q3-Q2)/02)].001TUEN  260
 330 V2-V2+V
 350 Q(I)-.5*(01-W)2)
                                   211

-------
3dO  NEXT I
370  SELECT  PRINT 21.1
3HO  PRINT  :PR TNT
390  PRINT "INJECTION  - PAT1EKN  JU (BfTLB)"
4 00  T'RT.NT  : PR INT
4.10  PRINT1ISTNG Af.O,n,A$
A20  PRTNTUPJINC A70,R,A$
A30  Pn.IN'niSINC ARO.R] ,$
ViO  PRTNTUPING A90,K,A$,B$
450  PRINTUSTMH 500,E
AfiO  %  It "VMMJHHI  /'/'
470  %  R •=//////////.//////  ////
ARO  %  R0=/////////'.//////  /'/'
490  %  KW=//.//////l !! I  ///////////
500  %  N -//,//////
510  PRINT  :PRINT
520  PRINT "       T             RH         0/ff
530  PRINTIIRINf, 5AO,B$ ,A$ ,A$ ,R$ ,A$,B$
5AO  7,     [/'////]         [////]     [////2////'//]      (/'//////'/']
550  T=6
5r,o. FOR i-i'rn  N
570  T=T4-T(I)
580  PRTNTUSINr, fiOO,T,R(l) ,Q(I)*//PT,K(l)
5(>0  NEXT I
MO  %////////////. ////////   ////, ////////    //, ////////! ! I I    /'.
610  END
                                       212

-------
.10 SELECT PRINT 005
20 T?T;M INJECTION - PATTERN  P.2
30 REM P,UJJ3 DILATED
40 DIM K(]00),T(100),ROOO),R2(100),Q(100)>A$2,P$3
50 SELECT PRINT 005
60 INPUT "GIVE THE UNIT OF  LENGTH",A$
70 INPUT "GIVE THE UNIT OF  TIME",B$
80 PRINT "GIVE THE FOLLOWING DATA  "
90 PRINT " 11 - OVERPRESSURE INTRODUCING THE GROUT"
100 PRINT " R - EXTERNAL  RADIUS"
110 PRINT "RO - RADIUS OF INJECTION HOLE"
120 PRINT "KO - COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY FOR THE LIOUT.D"
130 PRINT "     PRECEDING THE  GROUT"
17(0 T-pjNT "Kl - COEFFICIENT OF r^RMEARILTTY FnR Tnr;"
150 PRINT "     DILATING  LIQUID"
KiO PRINT "F- COEFFICIENT  DF  THF  SOIL POROSITY"
170 PRINT " N - OUANTITY  OF TIME  SETT'S"
.180 PRINT "Ml - NUMBER OF S'T.p INITIATING THE DILATATION"
190 INPUT MH,R,RO>KO,1'l,E,N,N1",n,R,Rl,lVn.,E,N,N.l
200 TRINT "GIVE THE  TIME  STEPS AND COEFFICIENTS OF"
210 PRINT "PERMEABILITY FOR THE GROUT"
220 FOR I=1TO N
2.TO TFT.NTUSINO 2AO,T.,I
2AO %T(/////'),K(/'<]l*K/LOG(R/R;i)
280 V?=0
290 v.l=>0
300 R3«P1
310 "OR I^ITO N
320 01=n2
330 man.1?
340 0=.5*(0..!-K)2)
350
                                   213

-------
360  Vl="2-i-V
3 70  R2«pnR(Vl/T->R112)
 380  IF T [NITUF.N 4]0
 T90  vi=V3+V
400  R3=SnR(Vl/E-HU!2) '

 420  IF Ann((03-Q2)/Q2)],001TlIRN  330
 430  V2=V2+V
4 40  IF T[N.1TIIF,N 460
 450  V3«V.3+V
                                    *
 460  R2(I)-R3  '
4 70  R(I)=R2   •
4 00  0(T) = ,5*(01>Q2)
 490  NF.XT I
 500  SFTJ'CT T'P.INT  211(150)
 510  PRINT :PRINT
 57.0  PRINT "INJECTION - WVTTRRN B2"
 530  PRINT "BULB ni.J-ATFJ)"
 540  PRINT SPRINT                                   ,
 550  PRIN'nTSTNn 610,II,A$

 570  PRTNTUFW, 630,R.I,A$
 580  PRTNTliniMn 640,K,A$,B$
 590  PRTNT.UPTNr, 650,K.1 ,A$,B$
 600  PRINTUT'TNO 660, F,
 610  %1I  - //W.//////  ////

 630  %RO - it 11 it. it Wfl  H
 640  %KW « /'./////'/'!!!•!  //////'////
 650  %K1 « //,////////!! ! !  W/M
 660, %tl  H //,/'///'//
 670  PRINT :PRINT
 fiMO  PRINT "       T            RB           1W          n/f
  KT"
 6 90  PRTNT1IS1NO 700,B$,A!?,A$,A$,R$fA$."$
 700  %    [//////]         [ini]         [-"/'I       r*/n/y.y»yn     r^'/«/
                                      214

-------
7 10 T«=0
 720 FOR  T=1TO N
 730 T»T+T(T)
740 PRTMTUSTNO  760,T,R(I) ,R
 750 NEXT I
 760 %/////>//////,//W   /////'/'.////////    ////////./'//////    //.///////'!
 I !
7 70 END
                                        215

-------
TO SKT.FCT "HINT 005
2n RF,H  TtuF.m'ioM - "ATTORN m  (?m,?,)
30 DIM  K.(100),T(100),R(100),Q(100),A$2,R-03
40 INPUT  "HIVE TTin UNIT OF
50 TMJ'UT  "OIVI! THF, UNIT OF
do rnTiiT  "OTVF, TI?K FOLLOWINC
70 PRINT  " I! - OVF,RPRF,FPTtnr, T.NTRODUniW TJIF
,TO PRINT  " ", - EXTF.PNAT, PAniT^"
90 PRINT  "RO - P.Aninr-  OF T.MJFn'ION nnT,F"
1.00 PRINT "KO - rnF.FFICTFNT OF PF^MFA^.TT,TTY  FOP, Tt'F TJOT'in"
310 1in,T.NT "     riRT^FDTNr TTIK nROUT11
17.0 PRINT " K - COF^FTflTfTt'r OF TUP POT.T,
130 T'RTJ.JT " T - TT"P  STfiP"
.1/iO "PINT " TJ - nUANTTTV nv TTMK  S
150 T.rjT'UT "H,P,RO,KO,F,,T,N",H,R,R1 ,
i r,n PRINT "nivF, TUF COEFFIHIKNTS  OF
170 PRINT "FOR Tjtr, OROITT"
1MO FOR T=1TO N
190 PPITITURT.NG ?.00, 1
200 %!<(//////)
2.10 INPUT "K(T.)",K(I)
220 NKXT  I
230 R(1)=R1
2AO 02=2*l!*K/T,or;(R/Rl)
250 "flu T-=1TO N
2dO ni«02
270 03«n2
7.90 n(T.)=0
300 A.1.=0
3.10 FOR J=].TO I
320 R(jH-1)=SOR(n(l-,T-n)*T/F-fR(J) 17)
330 Al.«A1^I,or, (R (J-M) /w (,T) ) /K (J)
3/i 0 NFXT J
350 n?.»2*n/(M+l,nr;(T?/R(T+l))/'0
                                      216

-------
360  IF AHS((03-02)/02)],OOr.r)iEN 270
370
3RO
390  NEXT I
400  SELECT PRINT 211
410  PRT11T :T'RTNT
420  PRINT "r.NJECTTON - PATTERN 01  (BULB)"
430  PRINT :"RT.NT
440  PRINTIJSINO  500,U,A$
450  PRTNTUST.Nr,  5.10, R,A$
460  FRINTUniNn  520,R1,A$
470  "RTNTUfUTir,  530,K,A$,B$
480  PRinTTIPINO  540, E
490  PRTNTUSIIir;  550,T,H$
500  %  I!  - ///////'.//////  /'//
510  %  R  - ////////.//////  ////
520  %  RO « ////////.//////  ///* •
530  %  KW - //.///////'I!!!  //////'////
540  %  N  « //.///'/'/'
550  %  T  - //////W,//////  //////
560  PRINT' :PRINT
570  PRINT "       T           RP.  ,       0/n             ?a(t
5HO  PRINTUSIlir;  590,B$,A$,A$,B$,A$,B,$
590  %     [/'/'//]
600  FOR I«n'0 N
6.ta  PRINTUSTMH  630,1''(T,T(T) ,0(1)
620  NEXT I
630  %///'///////'.///'////   ////,/'//////   //.///'/'/'111!    /'./'/""MM!
640  EN!)
                                        217

-------
10 SELECT PRINT  005
20 REM INJECTION - PATTERN C2
30 RF,M ]?ULn DILATED
40 DIM r(100) ,T(100) ,R(100) ,R2 (.1 00) ,0(1 00) ,A$2,P$3
50 SELECT PRINT  005
fio INPUT "GIVE THE UNIT OF LENGTH",A$
70 INPUT "GIVE THE UNIT OF TIMK",B$
80 PRINT "GIVE TUE FOI,LOWINn DATA"
90 PRINT " 11 - OVER^RF.SSURF INTRODUCING  THE HROUT"
.100 1'RINT " R -  FXTERMAL RAni.lTR"
110 T^INT "PO -  RADIUS OF IRTKHTION I'OLF,"
1.20 PRINT "KO -  CO^FFiniKNT OF PF,T1MFA^IT,ITV FOR T^F,
1.30 ppj.nT "      pRrnrjiiro THE IROUT"
IAO PPIMT "KI -  COF.FFICIF.TIT OF T-FPMFAPTTJTV FOP,"
150 PRINT "      TUF,  DILATING LTOUID"
1 60 PRINT " I5! -  roi'^FICIKNT OF TUF SOU,  POROSITV"
170 PRINT " N -  OUANTTTV nv TJMF RTEPS"
''HO PPTMT " T -  TT.TTT' SfFP"
190 VPT.NT "Mi -  N'lN^T7" OF r^'^P TNTTIAf''TNn  TUF DIT,/\TATinN"
200 INPUT "ll,R,RO,T'',0,Tn , F,N,T,N1M,U,R,R1 ,K,F1 ,F,N,T,N1
2.10 PRINT "GIVF,  THE  COEFFI.niFNTS OF
220 "RINT "FOR THE  OROUT"
230 I'OR T. = ].TO N
2AO VPvINTITSING 250,1
250 %K(W)
260 INPUT K(I)
270 NFXT I
2RO R(!)=R1.
290 n?.= 2'M"M«
350 o(T)=o
                                    218

-------
 360 Al»0
 370 IF T. [N1TI1EN  A30
 380 FOR J=1TO  I-N1-K1
 390 R(J+l)=RQR(q(I-J+l)*T/E+R'/>//,//////#  ##
 690 %N  - ft. ////////
 700 %KW - //.////////!!!!  «///////
                                      219

-------
710  %K1 = //.////////III!   ///////////
720  PRINT : PRINT
730  PRINT "       T             Rtt           RW  '           p/Tl
   KI"
740  PRINTUSINO 750, B$ ,A$,A$,A$,fl$,A$,R$
750  %
760  FOR I«1TO N
770  PRTTITURINO 790,T*I ,R2(I) ,T(I) ,9
780  NEXT I
790  %//////////// , ////////    //////// , ////////    ////////.////////   tt.Mif ! ! I !    /' . ///'/V ! I
I !
000  END
                                        220

-------
           APPENDIX B

PHOTOS OF THE  BLOCKS OBTAINED
ON  THE LABORATORY AND FIELD
INVESTIGATIONS  OF GROUTING
              221

-------
                                     1
 B-l. Test  1-bulb
B-2. Test 2 bulb
               222

-------
B-3.  Test  3-bulb
B-4. Test  4-bulb
                223

-------
B-5. Test  5-bulb
B-6. Test  6-bulb
                   224

-------
B-7. Test  7-bulb
B-8,  Test 8-bulb
                  225

-------
B-9.  Test 9-bulb
B-10.  Test 10-ring
                  226

-------
B-ll.  Test  11-ring
                    12
B-12.  Test  12-ring
             227

-------
                                      13
B-13. Test  13-ring
                                       14
B-14.  Test  14-ring
               228

-------
                      15
B-15.  Test  15-ring
R-16.  Test, 16-ring
             229

-------
B-17. Test  17-ring
                                    18
R-18.  Test  18-ring
           230

-------
B-19.  Test 19-ring
B-20.  Test  20-ring
            231

-------
B-21.  Test 21-ring
                                      22
B-22.  Test  22-horizontal plate
              232

-------
B-23.  Test 23 - horizontal plate
B-24.  Test 24 - horizontal plate
                   233

-------
                                            25
B-25.  Test 25 - horizontal plate
                                            26
B-26.  Test  26 - horizontal plate
                      234

-------
                                             27
 B-27.  Test  27-  horizontal plate
                                              28
B- 28. Test  28 - horizontal plate
                    235

-------
                                        29
B-29.  Test  29 - horizontal plate
B-30.  Tests Tl, T2, T3 - bulbs
                236

-------
                                  T4
B-31 .  Test T4 -  bulb
                                   T5
B-32. Test T5  -  ring
             237

-------
                                       T15
 B-33. Test T15 -  ri
                    ring
B-34. Tests T6 -T14 -  vertical curtain
                238

-------
                                   T10T16
B-35.  Tests  T10, T15, T16 -  vertical curtain
              239

-------