PB83-159319
ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF- MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER THROUGH
AQUACULTURE
0H. Hall, et al
Oklahoma State Department of Health
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
January 1983
Tฎ(gliiฎiiB Broiiraifci Ssreieฎ
NTTS
-------
EPA-600/2-83-007
January 1983
ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF
MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER THROUGH AQUACULTURE
by
Dempsey H. Hall
Joel E. Shelton
Oklahoma State Department of Health
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73152
Grant No. R-803703
Project Officer
William R. Duffer
Wastewater Management Branch
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
Ada, Oklahoma 74820
ROBERT S. KERR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ADA, OKLAHOMA 74820
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/2-83-007
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
3 159319
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER
THROUGH AQUACULTURE
S. REPORT DATE
January 1983
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Dempsey H. Hall and Joel E. Shelton
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Oklahoma State Department of Health
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73152
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
CAZB1B
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
R-803703
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Ada, Oklahoma 74820
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final 1977-1979
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/015
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16'ABSTTWeT studies were conducted using, two four-celled raceways constructed in series,
adjacent to a primary wastewater stabilization pond. One raceway functioned as the
experimental system, while the other served as a control condition-1 experimental
phase, which used a source of wastewater from the primary wastewater stabilization
pond, and (2) condition-2 experimental phase, which used a source of wastewater from
the primary clarifier of an activated sludge treatment plant, that also provided the
source of wastewater to the primary wastewater stabilization pond. Under both exper-
imental conditions the experimental raceway was stocked with a native Oklahoma fish,
Pimephales promelas Raf., at two stocking densities, one for each experimental phase.
An analysis of the wastewater quality data assembled during the two experimental
phases revealed moderate reductions in suspended solids under the condition-1 phase
which could have been attributed to the presence of the fish. No distinguishable re-
ductions in five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD,-) were statistically supported
that could be attributed to the fish stock. Under the analyses for the nutrient para-
meters for the condition-1. phase no distinguishable reductions due to fish were ob-
served. During the condition-2 phase, high mortality due primarily to oxygen stress
revealed no observable impact on the quality of wastewater that could be attributed to
the fish. Retention time of the wastewater within each cell of the raceway appeared
to play a strong role in the observed percentage reductions in most of the regulatory
and nutrient paramctcro.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Sewage treatment
Aquaculture
Wastewater utilization
Fish culture
Sewage effluents
68D
43F
91A
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
UNCLASSIFIED
93
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------
DISCLAIMER
Although the research described in this article has been funded wholly or
in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency through grant
number R803703 to Oklahoma State Department of Health, it has not been sub-
jected to the Agency's required peer and policy review and therefore does not
necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should
be inferred.
-------
.FOREWORD
EPA is charged by Congress to protect the Nation's land, air, and water
systems. Under a mandate of national environmental laws focused on air and
water quality, solid waste management and the control of toxic substances,
pesticides, noise, and radiation, the Agency strives to formulate and imple-
ment actions which lead to a compatible balance between human activities and
the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. In partial re-
sponse to these mandates, the Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,
Ada, Oklahoma, is charged with the mission to manage research programs: to
investigate the nature, transport, fate, and management of pollutants in ground
water; to develop and demonstrate technologies for treating wastewater with
soils and other natural systems;.to.control pollution from irrigated crop and
animal production agricultural activities; and to develop and demonstrate
cost-effective land treatment systems for the environmentally safe disposal of
solid and hazardous wastes.
Aquaculture processes could provide a simple and effective alternative
to conventional systems for treatment and management of wastewater. Finfish
culture is an area of wastewater aquaculture requiring exploratory research
efforts with several species to determine the feasibility of establishing
effective and economical treatment systems. In addition, water reuse aspects
of finfish culture systems utilizing municipal sewage should be evaluated.
This project was designed to test the treatment effectiveness of one species
of native finfish for two pretreatment levels of municipal waste effluent.
Results indicate that implementation of a culture system oriented toward
water reuse rather than wastewater treatment is more feasible for the species
of finfish tested.
Clinton W. Hall, Director
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research
Laboratory
111
-------
ABSTRACT
This research project was initiated with the overall objectives of: (a)
assessing the potential of aquaculture as a suitable means of treating mu-
nicipal sewage in a mid-temperate latitude on an annual basis, (b) to pro-
vide a set of design criteria for implementation of aquaculture as an
advanced wastewater treatment method, and (c) to achieve an effluent quality
amenable to PL-92-500 and the 1977, 1983 and 1985 standards and goals.
The studies were conducted using two four-celled raceways constructed in
series, adjacent to a primary wastewater stabilization pond. One raceway
functioned as the experimental system, while the other served as a control
condition-! experimental phase-, which used- a source of- wastewater -from the
primary wastewater stabilization pond, and (2) condition-2 experimental
phase, which used a source of wastewater from the primary clarifier of an
activated sludge treatment plant, that also provided the source of wastewater
to the primary wastewater stabilization pond. Under both experimental con-
ditions the experimental raceway was stocked with a native Oklahoma fish,
Pimephales promelas Raf., at two stocking densities, one for each experimen-
tal phase. -' ' ; -:....
An analysis of the wastewater quality data assembled during the two
experimental phases revealed moderate reductions in suspended solids under
the condition-! phase which could have been attributed to the presence of the
fish. No distinguishable reductions in five-day biochemical oxygen demand
(BODs) were statistically supported that could be attributed to the fish
stock. Under the analyses for the nutrient parameters for the condition-!
phase no distinguishable reductions due to fish were observed. During the
condition-2 phase, high mortality due primarily to oxygen stress revealed no
observable impact on the quality of wastewater that could be attributed to
the fish. Retention time of the wastewater within each cell of the raceway
appeared to play a strong role in the observed percentage reductions in most
of the regulatory and nutrient parameters. .
A marked reduction in fecal coliform organisms was attributed to the
retention time of the wastewater rather than due to influences of the fish
present in the cells-
Biological studies of fish growth and reproductive capabilities revealed
moderate successes with respect to reproduction, while the analysis of growth
revealed exceptional potentials for production of biomass over a relatively
short period of time.
This report covers the period of March, 1977, through August 1979.
iv
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword i i i
Abstract iv
Figures vi
Tab! es vi i
List of Abbreviations xi
Acknowl edgements xi i
1. Introduction 1
2. Summary and Conclusions ...........'.'...".'. 3
Wastewater analysis 3
Condition! experimental phase 3
Condition 2 experimental phase 3
Biological analysis 4
3. Recommendations 5
4. Study Site Description 6
5. Methods 10
Experimental design 10
Condition 1 experimental phase 10
Condition 2 experimental phase 10
Wastewater Analysis 11
Statistical analysis 11
Physico-chemical and biological assessment 12
Diurnal oxygen analysis 12
Biological assessment 13
6. Results and Discussion 14
References 25
Appendix A 26
Appendix B 46
Appendix C 67
Appendix D 71
Appendix E 80
-------
..FIGURES.
Number Page
1 Diagram of Oklahoma State Department of Health, Aquaculture
Research Facilities located at the Bethany Warr Acres
municipal wastewater treatment plant 7
2 Flow diagram of aquaculture raceways 9
3. Population structure in relation to total body length of
" Pimephales promelas Raf.',' monitored from July 21, 1978,
through October 31, 1978 17
VI
-------
TABLES
Number Page
1 Analytical Results for Regulatory Parameter, BOD, Sampled
During Condition-1 and -2 Experimental Phases 19
2 Analytical Results for Regulatory Parameter, Suspended Solids
Sampled During Condition-1 and-2 Experimental Phases 20
3 Analytical Results for Nutrient Parameter, Ammonia, Sampled
During Condition-! and-2 Experimental Phases 21
4 Analytical Results for Nutrient Parameters, Nitrates-Nitrites,
Sampled During Condition-1 and-2 Experimental Phases 22
5 Analytical Results for Nutrient Parameter, Organic Nitrogen,
Sampled During Condition-1 and-2 Experimental Phases 23
6 Analytical Results for Nutrient Parameter, Total Phosphorus,
Sampled During Condition-! and-2 Experimental Phases 24
7 Analytical Results for Nutrient Parameter, Ortho-Phosphates,
Sampled During Condition-1 and-2 Experimental Phases 25
A-l BODg Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 26
A-2 COD Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 27
A-3 TOC Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 28
A-4 Suspended Solids Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 29
A-5 Dissolved Solids Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 30
A-6 Settleable Solids Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1... 31
A-7 Volatile Suspended Solids Data Sampled During Operational
Condition-1 32
A-8 Ammonia Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 33
vn
-------
TABLES (Continued)
Number Page
A-9 N03+ N02 Data Sampled During Operational Condition-! ,_ 34
A-10 Organic Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-!.... 35
A-ll Kjeldahl Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1... 36
A-12 Total Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1...... 37
A-13 Total Phosphorus Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 38
A-14 Ortho Phosphate Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 39
A-15 Total Alkalinity Data Sampled During Operational Condition-! 40
A-16 "A" Alkalinity Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 41
A-17 pH Data Sampled During Operational Condition-! 42
A-18 Dissolved Oxygen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1 43
A-19 Temperature Data Sampled During Operational Condition-1..... 44
A-20 Feca! Coliform Data Sampled During Operational Condition-! 45
B-l BOD5 Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2.. 46
B-2 COD Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 48
B-3 TOC Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 49
B-4 Suspended Solids Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 50
B-5 Dissolved Solids Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 51
B-6 Sett!eable Solids Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2... 52
B-7 Volatile Suspended Solids Data Sampled During Operational
Condition-2 53
B-8 Ammonia Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 54
B-9 N03 + N02 Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 , 55
-------
TABLES (Continued)
Number Page
B-10 Organic Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 56
B-ll Kjeldahl Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2... 57
B-12 Total Nitrogen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 58
B-13 Total Phosphorus Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 59
B-14 Ortho-Phosphate Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 60
B-15 Total Alkalinity Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 61
B-16 "A" Alkalinity Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 62
B-17 pH Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 63
B-18 Dissolved Oxygen Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 64
8-19 Temperature Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 65
B-20 Fecal Coliform Data Sampled During Operational Condition-2 66
C-l Statistical Tabulations for Analysis of Regulatory Parameter,
BOD, Sampled During Condition-1 and-2 Experimental Phases 67
C-2 Statistical Tabulations for Analysis of Regulatory Parameter,
Suspended Solids, Sampled During Condition-! and-2
Experimental Phases 67
C-3 Statistical Tabulations for Analysis of Nutrient Parameter
Ammonia, Sampled During Condition-! and-2 Experimental
Phases 68
C-4 Statistical Tabulations for Analysis of Nutrient Parameter
Nitrates-Nitrites, Sampled During Condition-1 and-2
Experimental Phases 68
C-5 Statistical Tabulations for Analysis of Nutrient Parameter
Organic Nitrogen, Sampled During Condition-1 and-2
Experimental Phases 69
C-6 Statistical Tabulations for Analysis of Nutrient Parameter,
Total Phosphorus, Sampled During Condition-1 and-2
Experimental Phases 69
ix
-------
TABLES (Continued)
Number Page
C-7 Statistical Tabulations for Analysis of Nutrient Parameter,
Ortho-Phosphates, Sampled During Condition-! and-2
Experimental Phases 70
D-l Diurnal Oxygen and Temperature Data on Aquaculture Raceways,
Collected on June 29, and June 30, 1977 71
E-l Stocking and Harvesting Units of Pimphales promelas Raf.
Under Conditions-1 and-2 Experimental Phases SO
-------
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BODg --five day biochemical oxygen demand
COD --chemical oxygen demand
Contr. control
D.O. dissolved oxygen
Exp. --experimental
g --grams
gpm gallons per minute
kg --kilograms
1 liter
Ibs --pounds
I/sec liters~per second" ~~ ~~ '/" ~~
mg milligrams
ml milliliters
mm --millimeters
TOC --total organic carbon
XI
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the individuals and agencies involved in com-
piling the data of this study, including personnel of the Bethany-Warr Acres
sewage treatment plant who provided assistance and equipment used from time
to time in maintenance of the on-site research facilities. ;
Sample collections and facilities operation and maintenance were con-
ducted by Oklahoma State Department of Health personnel, John Sterling,
Sanitarian, and William Thomas, Sanitarian.
The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the efforts of personnel of
the Oklahoma State Department of" Health," Water Quality'Laboratory and the
Sanitary Bacteriology Laboratory for the analysis of wastewater samples.
A special thanks goes to Oklahoma State Department of Health, Training
and Certification personnel, Gary Sober, Sanitarian, and Richard Harrison,
Sanitarian, who aided project personnel from time to time during seining
operations. Also, support personnel of the Training and Certification Divi-
sion i Gwen Horribeak, Kay Breath, and Hulene Smith, who assisted with
voluminous paperwork during the course of the study are acknowledged.
Dr. C. H. Lawrence, Professor of Environmental Health, University of
Oklahoma Health Sciences, provided valuable consultation and conducted the
statistical analysis of data, and the authors wish to acknowledge his efforts.
The authors wish to express their gratitude and appreciation to the
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory for its support of this pro-
ject, and especially to Dr. William R. Duffer, Project Officer, for his
patience and guidance throughout the course of the study.
-------
_ SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The current demand for advanced wastewater treatment practices, arising
from the enactment of PL 92-500, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of
1972 (1), coupled with a demand for energy conservation and the underlying
economic implications, is rapidly creating a dilemma in the field of waste-
water treatment. In Oklahoma alone, approximately 80 percent of the
communities are currently utilizing wastewater stabilization ponds as a means
of treating municipal sewage. Such conventional treatment practices have not
adequately produced effluents of a quality amenable to established standards
provided for by PL 92-500. ~ ~
The definition of effluent quality adopted pursuant to PL 92-500 re-
quires that all sewage treatment facilities meet minimum secondary treatment
standards. The standards are: (a) five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD,-)
of 30 milligrams/liter (mg/1), (b) suspended solids of 30 mg/1, and fecal
coliform of 200/100 milliliters (ml). Based on the classification of
Oklahoma streams as water quality limited segments and on waste load alloca-
tion studies performed by the Oklahoma State Department of Health, many
treatment facilities face a more stringent 6005 requirement of 20 mg/1.
The problem that currently exists in finding an equitable solution
arises not from a lack of advanced waste treatment technology but from cost
effective implementation of advanced physical-chemical treatment processes in
areas where the serviced population is inadequate to finance and maintain
such facilities. Such a problem establishes a strong premise for investiga-
ting the potentials of utilizing existing conventional treatment methods and
supplementing physico-chemical and biological treatment processes with
extended biological activity in the form of aquaculture.
The practices of aquaculture, although relatively ancient in origin, are
rapidly gaining worldwide recognition in terms of the potential for conver-
sion of primary nutrients to protein-rich products readily usable by man.
Until recently much of the emphasis has been on protein elaboration and very
little has been on the association of aquatic husbandry with wastewater
treatment or the potential of integrating the two ideas. The Oklahoma State
Department of Health has determined through preliminary studies that such an
integration of ideas presents sound realistic objectives for an advanced
wastewater treatment technique and is thus a basis for the current study (2).
The basic approach to wastewater treatment through aquaculture involves
the conversion of available nutrients to a harvestable biomass, thus
1
-------
producing a reduction in nutrients discharged to receiving waters. This is
accomplished by: (a) aerobic and anaerobic bacterial decomposition of
organic wastes to primary nutrients (carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus), (b)
algal utilization of nutrients, and (c) conversion of algal biomass to fish
biomass. The conversion of plankton biomass to fish biomass is accomplished
by the use of filter feeding type fish that feed primarily on phytoplankton
and zooplankton populations.
The primary objectives of this study were to: (a) assess the potential
of aquaculture as a suitable means of treating municipal sewage in a mid-
temperate latitude on an annual basis, (b) to provide a set of design
criteria for implementation of aquaculture as a wastewater treatment method,
and (c) to achieve an effluent quality amenable to PL 92-500 and the 1977,
1983, and 1985 standards and goals. Subordinate objectives included a
quantitative determination of the degree of sewage treatment during major
seasons, and an evaluation of practical uses and economic potentials of
biological products of the system.
The scope of this study was somewhat broad in context yet limited in
application
-------
SECTION 2
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS
Condition 1 Experimental Phase
1. The analysis of the regulatory parameter suspended solids, under the
wastewater and stocking conditions employed in the first experimental
phase, revealed an apparent contribution of the fish present within the
test cells. Such a contribution was reflected in a comparison between
the concentration of suspended sol ids" within the effluent .in the final
cell of the experimental versus control series raceways.
2. Unlike the suspended solids parameter, another regulatory parameter,
BOD5, showed no statistically significant contrast between experimental
and control cells, with respect to concentrations monitored. Such re-
sults suggest that the direct reduction in suspended solids was
insignificant to indirectly stimulate a reduction in BODr. The observed
percentage reduction in BODg from influent to effluent of each raceway
(control and experimental) was apparently related directly to the reten-
tion time of wastewater rather than the presence of the fish within the
wastewater. . .
3. Similarly, the magnitude of the observed reductions in suspended solids
reflects little, if any, effect on nutrient parameters as suggested by
the results of the analyses for these parameters.
4. In summary, the presence of Pimephales promelas Raf. within the waste-
water community, investigated within this study, produced observable
changes in the quality of wastewater discharged from the experimental
raceways. Although the observed changes were detectable with respect
to only one parameter, suspended solids, such an indicator is sufficient
to justify further investigations.
Condition 2 Experimental Phase
1. The analyses of regulatory parameters (BOD5 and suspended solids) and
nutrient parameters, under wastewater and stocking conditions in the
second experimental phase, revealed no apparent contribution of the fish
to a reduction in concentrations.
-------
2.""Considering the nature of the wastewater tested under the condition-2
experimental phase (wastewater of primary treatment quality), it is
apparent that if culture of fathead minnows is to be implemented as a
cost effective means of supplemental wastewater treatment, it should be
considered as an adjunct to the wastewater stabilization pond and not as
a substitute for the secondary treatment afforded by the wastewater
- stabilization pond processes.
BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
1. Under the wastewater conditions provided in the condition-! experimental
phase, wastewater from a primary wastewater stabilization pond, the
fathead minnow exhibited the ability to live and reproduce successfully*
with only limited threat from disease.
2. Under the wastewater conditions provided in the condition-2 experimental
phase, wastewater of primary treatment quality, the fathead minnow was
able to survive, but under extreme' stresses initiated by wastewater with
a high oxygen demand, such an existence is extremely limited and
.prohibits reproductive-rigor-and success.- - ,- ----- - -- -.-
3. In summary, the wastewater community provides an extremely opportunistic
environment that if managed and monitored closely may provide a very cost
effective approach to utilization of nutrients that conventionally are
carried away by receiving stream waters and very often ends up overload-
ing and upsetting the balance of nutrients provided for in the natural
stream environment. Finfish within the wastewater environment provides
an opportunity for recycling nutrients, capturing fundamental elements
within protein-rich products usable in numerous ways by man. Such an
approach can be feasibly implemented as a valuable water reuse technique.
-------
': f . SECTION,?
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Based on the results observed in this study a definite potential exists
with the integration of aquaculture techniques and wastewater treatment.
If such a goal is to be implemented, further studies are necessary to more
clearly define the intricate food web that exists within the waste stabi-
lization pond. Such a definition would provide a much stronger basis for
selection of the appropriate species of fish to be cultured.
2. The unstable nature of raw and even primarily treated municipal waste-
water limits the potentiaTof"introducing a population of finfish due to
the high level of competition for oxygen; therefore, if finfish culture
in the wastewater environment is to be a successful integration of pro-
ductivity and wastewater treatment, such operations should focus on
supplementing the secondary treatment mode.
3. Due to the wide range of diurnal flucuations in oxygen and temperature
within the wastewater stabilization pond, finfish culture practices
should include: (1) a source of emergency aeration to provide a means of
quickly stabilizing septic conditions often experienced during the year-
round operation of the lagoon, particularly during late summer and early
spring seasons, (2) adequate manpower and equipment for handling of fish
stock to limit the stresses imposed on the fish during handling, (3) di-
sease control protocol to insure minimal stock loss, and (4) alternative
planning for wastewater flows, including multiple raceway designs, which
allow the operator a means of alternating flow and thus eliminate pro-
blems with overloading. ;
4. The successful implementation of aquaculture practices with wastewater
treatment will rely heavily on interdisciplinary skills of biologists and
wastewater treatment specialists particularly in organization and estab-
lishment of such an operation. Proper initial organization will insure a
smooth operation which should require only minimal skills to maintain
following initial installation. .
-------
. _ _.__ SECTIQN.4
STUDY SITE DESCRIPTION
The study was conducted at the Bethany-Warr Acres sewage treatment
facility which serves a portion of the northwest Oklahoma City municipal com-
plex. The treatment phases of the facility consisted of: (a) screening, (b)
grinding (comminutor), (c) aeration, (d) primary and secondary clarification,
and (e) sludge digestion. Following these treatment phases the effluent was
discharged to primary and secondary wastewater stabilization ponds, where the
wastewater underwent biological oxidation processes before being discharged
to the adjacent receiving stream (Bluff Creek, a first-order stream location
on the Cottonwood Creek drainage"basin). '" " "" "~" """ " ~ ~ "
In order to obtain the necessary controls, with respect to flow and re-
tention of wastewater, a separate small scaled series of wastewater stabili-
zation ponds were constructed adjacent to the existing primary wastewater
stabilization pond. This facility, as shown in Figure 1, consisted of eight
earthen cells, arranged in two series with four cells in each series.. Each
cell had a surface area of approximately 0.1 hectare (0.25 acres). The two
series of cells were constructed in parallel, with each individual cell with-
in one series corresponding to the same numbered cell within the adjacent
series, with respect to location, flow, and retention time. This des.ign
allowed for one series to serve as an experimental control for the other
series. All cells within a single series were constructed as identically as
possible to its corresponding cell of the adjacent series, and all ponds were
designed with the same general specifications with respect to depth, areas, and
distribution receptacles. At the end of the two series of treatment cells,
one large cell was constructed to receive flows from both series of cells.
The effluent was periodically used for irrigation purposes or was
pumped back into the secondary wastewater stabilization pond of the permanent
treatment facility.
The experimental facilities were designed to maintain maximum achieve-
able control on flow of wastewater through use of distribution receptacles
equipped with 30 V-notch weirs. The arrangement of these receptacles was
designed to allow the investigator an alternate means of distributing flow of
wastewater throughout the entire series of experimental cells. This arrange-
ment provided a means for wide variation in experimental approach.
Each of the experimental cells were equipped with a means of receiving
flows from two sources: (a) an inlet which obtained wastewater by gravita-
tional flow from the cell located in prior sequence of the same series
-------
Return Efficient Secondary Lagoon
Holding
Cell m
H
rop-J]
,4A ftiJA ]-,
L ' J
i i
r i ^ " i 1 J
MS --HI * JS -M
L J - -X
i t
-------
(Figure 2), and (b) an alternate inlet which received wastewater by gravita-
tional flow from the initial source of wastewater. Likewise, each pond was
equipped with two means of discharge: (a) across a V-notch weir (30ฐ) into
the next cell in sequence of the same series, and (b) through a main drain
line which emptied directly into the holding cell located at the lower end of
the two series. This arrangement of inlets and outlets allowed the investi-
gators a means of operating the system with serial flow utilizing four cells
as a'raceway, or by utilizing"the'main drain'discharge point and the alter-
nate inlet source, each cell could function independently, receiving waste-
water from the initial source and discharging directly into the holding cell.
The latter flow pattern reduces the raceway effect, allowing, for retention
and treatment of wastewater through one cell versus retention and treatment
of wastewater through four cells, as was possible in the serial flow pattern.
Due to the nature of the wastewater received by the experimental system,
the serial flow pattern was selected as the most appropriate design for
experimentation, as it allowed for optimum retention time which in turn pro-
duced a quality of wastewater suitable for fish culture.
-------
Return Efficient Secone/art/ /.aqoon ^
Cell
Pump
ding
' m
,
JT ~~'^
ฑLi
ซ-. !
; H
, ,
r> ' . ^
i
-H
t. . ^
, * -
^.
4-')
H-,1
*"
\ x
x \ \
Surface Irrigation N
\ \ \
\ \ \
\ \
\
\
\
..... -JO V
....... Drain
Weir
o
o
Figure 2. Flow diagram of aquaculture raceways
-------
.SECTI.ON..5.
METHODS
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
During the course of the study, the existing treatment facility under-
went reconstruction and modification which necessitated the use of two
experimental phases utilizing two separate sets of conditions. The two sets
of conditions differed primarily with respect .to wastewater characteristics
and stocking density of fish. The physical characteristics of flow and re-
tention were the same for. both experimental phases.
Under both experimental phases, wastewater was received by a centrally lo-
cated distribution receptacle (Figure 1) and was distributed to each of the
two series raceways at an average flow of 0.95 liters/second (I/sec) (15
gallons per minute). The flow rate varied from 0.63 I/sec (10 gpm) to 1.26
I/sec (20 gpm) depending on several uncontrollable factors inherent to
gravitational distribution. This variation in flow necessitated daily moni-
toring and correction by adjustment of the V-notch weirs in the distribution
receptacles of the first cell in each series. The flow between each cell
within each series varied somewhat from the flow to the first cell in each
series, depending on the evaporation rate and the amount of rainfall. With-
out compensating for input from rainfall or loss from evaporation, the reten-
tion time of wastewater in each cell was approximately 15-20 days.
; For purposes of identifying sample locations each of the cells in the
two series was assigned numbers sequentially through the series. Along with
the numbered location, subscripts were assigned to designate the control
series and the test series; A - designating the control series with no fish
and B - designating the experimental series which contained fish (Figure 1).
Condition-! Experimental Phase
During the condition-1 experimental phase, from October 19, 1977,
through May 17, 1978, primary lagoon effluent was provided as the source of
wastewater for experimentation. Each of the four cells within the test
series were stocked with Pimephales promelas Raf. at a density of approximate-
ly 38(Kilograms/liter) hectare (83 pounds/0.25 acres).
Condition-2 Experimental Phase
During the condition-2 experimental phase, from August 2, 1978, through
May 9, 1979, the wastewater source was supplied directly from the primary
-.10 : ':
-------
clarifier of the existing treatment facility, by means of a submersible pump
transmitting wastewater to the centrally located collection point and dis-
tributing the wastewater to the two series raceways. Due to the high sus-
pended solids and low D.O. content of the wastewater received from the pri-
mary clarifier, it was necessary to provide retention to the wastewater,
allowing time for stabilization and production of phytoplankton. This was
accomplished by eliminating fish stock from the first cell in the experimental
series, which provided a much more-stable environment for the finfish in the
remaining cells of this series. The remaining three cells were stocked at a
density of 151 kg/0.1 hectare (334 lbs./0.25 acres).
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS
During the course of study, under condition-! and -2 phases, wastewater
samples were .collected weekly from the discharge point at each cell within
the two series and a sample was collected from the initial wastewater sup-
plied to the system. All samples were collected on the same weekday at
approximately the same time of day (1100-1200 hour). Along with the waste-
water samples, temperature.and.dissolved oxygen data were collected at each
sampling location. Upon collection, samples were preserved (one aliquot was
placed on ice and one acidified with H2S04 to a pH of 2) and transported to
the Oklahoma State Department of Health, Water Quality Laboratory, in Okla-
homa City, for analysis. Separate aliquots were sampled at all locations for
bacteriological analyses and placed on ice for transporting to the laboratory.
In the laboratory, wastewater samples were analyzed employing methods and
procedures in accordance with those specified by EPA (8), and Standard Methods
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (9). A total of 19 parameters
were analyzed in addition to the two field parameters, D.O., afld temperature.
The 18 parameters analyzed in the laboratory included: BODs, (COD) Chemical
Oxygen Demand, (TOC) Total Organic Carbon, suspended solids, dissolved solids,
settleable solids, volatile suspended solids, ammonia nitrogen, nitrates and
nitrites, organic nitrogen, Kjeldhal nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phospho-
rus, ortho-phophates, total alkalinity, phosphate alkalinity, pH and fecal
coliform. The data were aggregated according to laboratory analyses, cate-
gorized according to influent and stocking conditions, and tabulated by date
and concentration found in the influent to the two series of raceways and the
effluents from the four experimental and the four matching control cells
(Tables 1 through 20 in Appendices A through B). Each group was then inspect-
ed for the contribution of that parameter to the overall description of the
performance of the system. Based on this inspection, more detailed analyses of
the regulatory parameter (BODij and suspended solids) and the nutrient parame-
ters (organic nitrogen, ammonia, nitrate-nitrite and orotho and total phos-
phates) were conducted.
Statistical Analysis
The performance of the system under two operational modes was evaluated
by determining the mean effluent levels from each cell for each of the
selected parameters and by comparing changes in the character of the flow as
IT
-------
it moved through the experimental series of cells with the character of the
flow at the corresponding points in the control series. In addition, over-
all performance of each series was determined by comparing the effluent con-
centration from the last cell in each series with the level of that parameter
in the influent to the series.
In order to minimize the variability due to the day-to-day changes in
the character of the-influent-and variability-due-to seasonal influences on
temperature, statistical comparison of each cell in the experimental series
with the corresponding cell in the control series, was conducted utilizing.
a t-test of observations paired according to sample date. This permitted the
use of alpha level of 0.05.
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
Diurnal Oxygen Analysis
During the onset of the study it was necessary to establish a physico-
chemical -profile of the wastewater, .within the-experimental-facility, pri-
marily to provide background information relating to the maintenance of
viable fish populations. The D.O. concentrations are an important factor in
predicting the overall success of sustaining biological activity within the
wastewater environment. The overall success of fish populations, as indica-
ted by their growth and reproductive vigor, was highly dependent on the
stability of D.O. concentrations, and the range of diurnal fluctuation in
oxygen levels. : . . , ,
In the early stages of this study, after the raceways were filled and
stabilized, a diurnal oxygen survey was conducted on each cell within each
series to determine the range of fluctuation in oxygen concentration. The
survey was conducted over a 24-hour period using a YSI, Model 57, Dissolved
Oxygen Analyzer. Each cell was sampled at three points within the water column:
surface, 1 meter depth and 2 meter depth.
It is recognized by the investigators that, due to day-to-day changes in
the nature of the municipal wastewater effluents, one such analysis would be
insufficient and inconclusive to evaluate the suitability of the wastewater
for the production of fish. For this reason, emphasis was placed on the fre-
quent monitoring of oxygen, temperatures and pH parameters throughout the en-
tire study.
Due to the observed critical periods of low oxygen concentrations en-
countered during the study, a means of; supplementing photosynthetic oxygen
production was provided, using forced air blowers and perforated distribu-
tion lines for diffusers. The supplemental aeration supply was designed to
provide aeration to experimental and control cells concurrently to minimize
bias to the experimentation. Most of the supplemental aeration was necessary
during the winter months when extended periods of ice cover jeopardized the
existence of sufficient dissolved oxygen concentrations.
12
-------
Bi ol ogi cal' Assessment "
In addition to the monitoring of physico-chemical parameters, biological
activity of fish was monitored visually and through analysis of growth
patterns. Factors monitored visually included, reproductive activity, move-
ment and congregation of fish due to oxygen stress, mortality, disease and
periodic inventory of fish stock.
Growth analyses were conducted over a 15-week period from July 21, 1978,
through October 31, 1978 (condition-2, experimental phase). Samples were
collected on a bi-weekly basis for the first six weeks of the analysis. The
last two samples were collected at monthly intervals, with the last sample
corresponding to the fall harvest and population inventory. Of the three
experimental cells stocked with fish during the condition-2 experimental
phase, the last cell in the series displayed the most favorable conditions
for fish production, with the least amount of disease and mortality, and the
most vigorous reproductive activity. For this reason, growth analyses were
limited to the fish stocked within the last experimental cell. The samples
were collected utilizing a nylon seine (1/8 inch mesh) to obtain grab samples
at various, points .across the experimental-cell The grab.samples were com-
posited to obtain a representative cross-section of the population. The fish
samples collected were transported to the laboratory where they were weighed
and measured to obtain length of individuals and total sample biomass. A
total of approximately 500 fish were used for the analysis for each unit of
sampling.
The periodic inventory and harvesting of fish throughout the entire
study was conducted using a nylon seine (1/8-inch mesh, 100 feet in length).
To insure that each cell was thoroughly inventoried, each cell was seined un-
til the catch/unit of effort had declined to approximately one percent of the
known stocking density. Due to the nature of the movement patterns of the
fathead minnow, approximately 70 to 80 percent of the stock were obtained in
the first two units of effort. The measurement of quantity was made as fish
were removed from the seine. The fish were then transferred to holding
troughs and held until completion of inventory of the cell. Supplemental
aeration was provided to the holding tanks to minimize oxygen stress to the
fish during handling. Since only minimal disease problems were observed dur-
ing the course of the study, no chemical or antibiotic treatment was neces-
sary, i
With respect to visual monitoring of reproductive activity, artificial
spawning substrates were placed in the experimental cells, which allowed the
investigators a means of determining the onset of spawning activity ^and a
comparison of activity between each stage or cell of the experimental race-
way. Although spawning success is a determinable factor through standing
crop measurements, the quantification of spawns, with respect to numbers and
size of egg masses produced and their fertility rates were not determinable
due to the scale of the operation and the quantity of fish initially stocked.
13:
-------
SECTION 6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS
During the condition-! experimental phase, the statistical analysis of
data (Table 1) indicated a significantly lower concentration in the
first experimental cell than in the first control cell, both at the 0.1 and
0.05 alpha levels. The only other cells which maintained any significant
differences were the second cells of the raceway series, which displayed
significant differences at the 0.1 level only. Considering the real differ-
ences in mean effluent concentrations and-the relatively narrow'range of per-
cent reduction values, it was assumed that no real differences existed be-
tween the control cell effluent BODij levels and the experimental cell, BOD5
levels. Although the fish present in the first and second experimental cells
could have contributed to the measured differences found between the experi-
mental cell and its corresponding control, careful consideration should be
given to the actual observed differences in numbers before drawing any defin-
itive conclusions.
Under the condition-2 experimental phase, the results of the BODs
analyses (Table 1) indicated no statistically significant differences in
effluent concentrations for each of the experimental and control cells of
the first three stages in the raceway series. The last experimental cell
containing fish (cell 4B), displayed significantly higher effluent BODs than
its corresponding control cell. Also, the observed percentage reduction was
much higher for all control cells than for all experimental cells containing
fish. Unlike the condition-1 phase experimentation, the fish stock showed
no tendency towards a reduction in BODs concentrations. Considering the
nature of the effluent received by the experimental system under the condi-
tion-2 experimental phase, which had much less oxidation time prior to
experimental use and lower algal populations, the results appear less con-
flicting. In addition, finfish wastes resulting from the much higher stocking
densities utilized under this phase may have attributed to the 6005 level of
the experimental pond.
Statistical analysis of the suspended solids data under condition-!
experimental phase, reveals a somewhat different trend from that of BODc
concentration within the first two experimental cells showing no significant
difference in effluent suspended solids concentration between their
corresponding control cells (Table 2). The third experimental cell showed a
significantly lower concentration of suspended solids at an alpha level of
0.1 than its corresponding control and the fourth experimental cell showed a
.:; 14-
-------
significantly lower concentration at the 0.1 and the .05 alpha levels. Com-
parison of the overall 20 percent reduction in suspended solids from the
point of introduction of influent into the raceway to the effluent from the
number four experimental cell, and the 11 percent increase in suspended
solids observed across the control cells indicates that a real difference
exists. This difference can be attributed to the high finfish population
present in the third and fourth experimental cells and their role in reducing
suspended solids.""Also,-~the-absence of significant reductions in the first
two cells of the series likely resulted from the low finfish population
levels (Table E-l). During the condition-! experimental phase,a!l of the
fish were lost in the first experimental cell over the course of the study
due to undeterminable mortality factors. Only 10 percent survived the study
in the second experimental cell and 30 percent survived in the third cell.
The fourth cell displayed a 30 percent increase in standing crop from initial
stocking to harvest. These population levels serve to support the results
observed under the condition-1 experimental phase, with respect to suspended
solids concentrations.
The results seen in Table 2 for statistical analyses of suspended solids
data-under condition-2 experimental phase-tends to reflect the same pattern
discussed earlier for BODs data under condition-2. Experimental cells three
and four were found to contain significantly higher concentrations of sus-
pended solids than the corresponding control cells. In fact, a 94 percent
increase in suspended solids was observed from the influent into the raceway
series to the effluent of the fourth experimental cell, and a four percent
increase was observed over the control cells. Such results support the view
that a large proportion of the suspended solids present in the primary
clarifier waste:stream were not suitable for consumption by the finfish popu-
lation levels contributed to the suspended solids load.
Experimental results for the six nutrient parameters revealed a somewhat
contradictory pattern (Tables 3 through 7). Statistical analysis of ammonia
data,as shown in Table 3,indicate that a considerable reduction in ammonia
concentrations occurred from the point.of introduction of the influent into
the first experimental cell to the point of discharge from the last cell in
the series, under both experimental phases of operation. During the condi-
tion-1 phase experimentation, the ammonia concentrations were significantly
higher in the experimental cells 2 through 4 than the concentrations found in
their corresponding control cells. During the condition-2 phase of experi-
mentation,the data does not reveal meaningful differences between experimen-
tal and control cell concentrations. The first cell in the series displayed
a significantly higher concentration than its corresponding control, but this
statistical significance diminished throughout the remaining cells within the
series. Considering the actual observed mean concentrations, the observed
significance does not lend itself to a practical conclusion.
Statistical analyses of the nitrate-nitrite data^as shown in Table 4,re-
vealed a substantial increase in concentrations from the beginning of the
raceway to the end, under both experimental phases. The differences in con-
centrations between experimental cells containing fish and the control cells
were significantly lower under the condition-! phase, while no significant
-------
' V differences were observed under the condition-2 phase. ._.
The remaining three nutrient parameters analyzed (organic nitrogen,
total phosphorus, and ortho phosphates, Table 5 through 7, respectively) all
show reductions in concentration from the beginning concentrations found in
the first cell of the raceway, indicating the apparent value of retention
time of wastewater-in the lagooning process. Observed differences in concen-
trations of- the- three- parameters -between experimental cellsand correspond-
ing controls; however, failed to reveal any pattern of significance that
would lend itself to a sound conclusion in terms of a reduction in nutrients
due to removal of solids by the fish living within the cells.
BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
The results of the growth analyses are represented according to percent
frequency of occurrence of individuals within eight body length classifica-
tions, as observed on six sampling dates (Figure 3). During the interval
between the first and second sampling dates a slight change in population
structure was reflected by the change of-percent frequency of occurrence of
individuals within the 30-39 mm class, from 38 percent for the initial sam-
ple of July 21, 1978,to 53.5 percent for the sample of August 3, 1978. Such
a change indicates the growth of some individuals during this initial
interval. The absence of individuals in the largest length classification
(80-89 mm) on August 3, 1978, likely was due to mortality initiated by stock-
ing stress. Sampling error which could have affected the capture of these
individuals; however, since the technique employed readily .lent itself to
errors of this nature. ' /-;.-. , .
The most predominant shift in population structure was detected .on the
third sampling date of August 17, 1978. At this time, none of the indivi- :
duals in the first two length classifications observed prior to the sample
date were present in the samples. Such results tend to reflect the matura-
tion of individuals within the sewage environment.
The structure of the population remained relatively constant during the
final three sampling intervals, reflecting slow growth patterns. The con-
tinued growth of some individuals was indicated in the latter samples by
much better representation within the 80-89 mm length classification.
During the course of study,visual inspection of the general condition
of the fish within the wastewater environment revealed a healthy and repro-
ductively viable population with only a moderate amount of disease,
apparently initiated by handling during seining operations. Although
spawning was observed during the study, the apparent success of such repro-
ductive activity was low as reflected by standing crop harvested during the
condition-2 experimental phase. Low oxygen concentrations experienced
throughout the course of the study probably contributed the single most
detrimental impact on the ability of the young minnows to survive the
embrionic stages of development.
16
-------
50
40
u
I
030
LJ
o:
u.
20
10
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69
LENGTH (MM)
70-79 80-89
Figure 3. Population structure in relation to total body length of
Pimephales promelas Raf., monitored from July 21, 1978, through
October 31, 1978.
.17.
-------
TABLE 1. ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR REGULATORY PARAMETER," BODr, SAMPLED
DURING CONDITIONS-! and-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
CONDITION 1
Stat.
Para.
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
Infl. Cell
57.8
34.0 Contr.
Exp.
observations)
1
24
12
25
19
n
24
a,
Effluent
2 3
.6
.6
.0
.9
.6
.0
b
CONDITION
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
60.9
41.7 Contr.
31
Exp.
observations )
42
23
33
47
28
33
.8
.8
.0
.2
.3
.0
27.
17.
25.
21.
14.
25.
b
2
32.
17.
33.
31.
21.
32.
0
2
0
5
1
0
5
8
0
7
3
0
27
15
24
24
14
24
30
20
33
28
15
32
.5
.9
.0
.6
.7
.0
.3
.4
.0
.4
.7
.0
4
22
13
24
21
11
22
26
14
33
30
14
33
a,
%
Red.
.4 61
.2
.0
.5 63
.1
.0
.7 41C
.6
.0
.1 33C
.0
.0
b
a. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.05.
b. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.10.
; c. Composite of cell 1 (X = 15.0, S = 26.1, N = 66) was used to
calculate % reduction.
18
-------
TABLE 2.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR REGULATORY PARAMETER, SUSPENDED SOLIDS
SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! and-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
CONDITION
Stat.
Para.
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
Infl. Cell
32.8
19.2 Contr.
25
Exp.
observations)
1
24
21
24
22
17
26
.2
.7
.0
.5
.0
.0
CONDITION
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mq/1
S
N
(paired
45.1
31.3 Contr.
32
Exp.
observations)
30
21
32
20
14
34
.1
.2
.0
.3
.2
.0
1
2
34
20
26
30
23
25
2
26
15
34
28
19
33
Effluent
3
.3
.8
.0
.3
.8
.0
.5
.5
.0
.6
.2
.0
34
20
25
26
n
25
b
29
23
34
37
20
34
a,
.1
.5
.0
.3
.7
.0
.6
.1
.0
.8
.8
.0
b
4
36
23
26
26
8
25
a,
28
13
34
57
28
34
a,
.5
.4
.0
.4
.5
.0
b
.6
.0
.0
.5
.4
.0
b
%
Red.
-n
20
4C
-94
a. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.05.
b. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.10.
c. Composite of cell 1 (x = 29.7, S = 17.9, N = 66) was used to
calculate % reduction.
19
-------
TABLE 3. ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR NUTRIENT PARAMETER, AMMONIA, SAMPLED
DURING CONDITIONS-1 and-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
CONDITION
Stat.
Para.
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
Infl.
24.6
3.14
26
obs.)
Cell 1
22.
Contr. 3.
26.
22.
Exp. 3.
26.
1
Effluent
2 3
40
99
00
70
58
00
CONDITION
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
17.4
6.08
33
obs.)
17.
Contr. 5.
34.
18.
Exp. 5.
34.
a,
60
14
00
60
16
00
b
14.
6.
26.
17.
4.
26.
a,
2
11.
6.
34.
12.
6.
34.
b
30
37
00
50
30
00
b
30
02
00
50
04
00
8.
6.
25.
11.
5.
26.
a,
6.
6.
34.
7.
5.
33.
79
75
00
00
66
00
b
42
06
00
27
66
00
4
5
26
6
5
26
a
2
4
34
3
3
34
4
.86
.41
.00
.57
.23
.00
,b
.77
.35
.00
.05
.60
.00
Red.
80
'73
85C
83
a. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.05.
b. Indicates statistical significance at X - 0.10.
c. Composite of Cell 1 (X - 18.1, S = 5.15, N = 68) was used to
calculate % reduction.
. 20
-------
TABLE 4.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR
SAMPLED DURING CONDITION
NUTRIENTS PARAMETERS, NITRATES-NITRITES
-1 and-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
CONDITION
Stat.
Para.
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/l
S
N
(paired
Infl
0.10
0.02
26
obs.)
Cell
1
0.24
Contr. 0.20
26.00
0
Exp. 0
26
.31
.54
.00
1
Effluent
2 3
2
2
26
1
1
26
CONDITION
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
0.26
0.48
34
obs.)
0.28
Contr. 0.43
33.00
0
Exp. 0
33
.28
.49
.00
1
1
34
1
1
34
.66
.05
.00
.83
.81
.00
a.b
2
.28
.01
.00
.57
.32
.00
4.
4.
26.
3.
2.
26.
a
1.
1.
34.
1.
1.
34.
77
21
00
16
39
00
,b
72
37
00
56
11
00
%
4 Red.
4.
3.
26.
3.
2.
26.
a
1.
1.
34.
0.
0.
34.
89 4790
78
00
50 3400
35
00
,b
21 332C
12
00
99 254
80
00
a. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.05.
b. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.10.
c. Composite of Cell 1 (X = 0.28, S = 0.46, N = 66) was used to
;calculate % increase.
21
-------
TABLE 5. ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR NUTRIENT PARAMETER, ORGANIC NITROGEN,
SAMPLED DURING CONDITION -1 and-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
CONDITION 1
Stat.
Para.
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
Infl.
9.06
3.48
25
obs.)
Cell
5
Contr. 3
26
5
Exp. 3
26
1
.45
.35
.00
.75
.13
.00
CONDITION
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
8.91
7.24
30
obs.)
6
Contr. 4
32
6
Exp. 4
33
.57
.25
.00
.82
.25
.00
Effluent
2 3
6.
3.
25.
5.
2.
26.
a
2
5.
2.
34.
6.
5.
33.
05
09
00
32
73
00
,b
29
92
00
19
47
00
6
1
24
5
2
26
4
1
33
4
1
32
.16
.96
.00
.42
.86
.00
.67
.92
.00
.69
.74
.00
V
4 Red.
5.
1.
26.
5.
1.
26.
4.
1.
33.
5.
1.
33.
a
69 37
99
00 .
81 36
49
00
67 30 C
23
00
97 11
88
00
,b
; a. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.05.
b. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.10.
c. Composite of Cell 1 (R = 6.70, S = 4.25, N = 65) was used to
calculate % reduction.
22
-------
TABLE 6. ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR NUTRIENT PARAMETER, TOTAL PHOSPHORUS,
SAMPLED DURING CONDITION .-1 and-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
CONDITION
Stat.
Para. Infl. Cell
X
X
t
mo/1 11.68
S 1.16 Contr.
N 23
mg/1
S
N Exp.
(paired obs. )
1
10.
2.
24.
10.
1.
23.
1
Effluent
2 3
47
29
00
95
24
00
10
1
23
9
2
24
CONDITION
X
X
t
mg/1 9.80
S 5.44 Contr..
N 34
mg/1
S Exp.
N
(paired obs.)
11.
6.
33.
11.
4.
34.
63
13
00
32
57
00
9
4
34
10
4
34
.02
.86
.00
.95
.55
.00
2
.43
.28
.00
.38
.46
.00
a,b
9
2
24
9
2
23
7
3
33
7
3
34
.51
.50
.00
.73
.68
.00
b
.48
.33
.00
.55
.66
.00
9
3
24
9
2
24
4
2
34
4
2
33
%
4 Red.
.54 19
.29
.00
.35 20
.87
.00
.88 57C
.94
.00
.34 62
.12
.00
b
a. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.05.
b. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.10.
c. Composite of Cell 1 ( X = 11.47, S = 5.39, N = 67) was used to
calculate % reduction.
.: 23 __ __
-------
_ TABLE 7. ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR NUTRIENT PARAMETER, ORTHO-PHOSPHATES,
SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! and-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
CONDITION 1 ..
Stat.
Para.
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
Infl. Cell
10.37
0.82 Contr.
25
Exp.
obs.)
1
9.
1.
25.
10.
1.
25.
88
18
00
18
21
00
2
8.
1.
25.
9.
2.
25.
b
CONDITION
X
X
t
mg/1
S
N
mg/1
S
N
(paired
7.75
5.00 Contr.
33
Exp.
obs.)
8.
3.
34.
9.
4.
34.
a
41
49
00
29
30
00
,b
7.
3.
34.
7.
3.
34.
a
Effluent .
3
75
68
00
47
13
00
2
56
62
00
99
15
00
,b
8.
1.
25.
9.
1.
24.
5.
2.
33.
5.
2.
34.
73
88
00
90
83
00
91
58
00
89
65
00
,. . .... % - "
4 Red.
8.
2.
25.
8.
2.
24.
3.
2.
34.
3.
1.
33.
a
52 18
93
00
38 19
11
00
90 59C
68
00
33 62
94
00
,b
a. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.05.
b. Indicates statistical significance at X = 0.10.
c. Composite of Cell 1 ( )( = 8.85, S = 3.92, N = 68) was used to
calculate % reduction.
:; 24
-------
REFERENCES
1. 92 USC, Public Law 92-500, An Act to Amend the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, 86 Stat. 816 (October 18, 1972) 89 p.
40 CFR 133.
2. Carpenter, R. Leroy, Mark S. Coleman, Ron Jarman, and Edward W. Furia.
Biological control of water pollution. Univ. of Penn. Press,
J. Tourbier, and Robert W. Pierson, Jr., Editors. 1976.
3. Cross, Frank B. Handbook of Fishes of Kansas. Univ. of Kansas, Museum
_ ..of.Natural .History,. E..Raymond.Hall, _Editor._April.. 1967.
4. Miller, Rudolph H., and Henry W. Robison. The Fishes of Oklahoma.
Oklahoma State University Press. 1973.
5. . Pflieger, William F. The Fishes of Missouri. Missouri Dept. of Con-
servation, Mark Sullivan, Editor. 1975.
6. Coyle, E: E. The algal food Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow).
Ohio J. Sci., 30 (1): 23-35, 1930.
7. Starrett, W. C. Food relationships of the minnows of the Des Moines
River, Iowa. Ecology, 31 (2):216-233, 1950.
8. Environmental Protection Agency. Manual of Methods for Chemical
Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA 625/6-74-003a.
9. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 14th
Edition., American Public Health Association, New York. 1976.
25
-------
APPENDIX
TABLE A-l, BODs DATA SAMPLED' DURING OPERATIONALCONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9 -- -
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
2/26
4/10
5/17
Infl
35**
23
43
_29-
19
12
44
13
63 :
117
45 .
52 '
84
113
70
104 :
no
114
88 :
38
60
17
38
-
66
49
1A
32
15
14
23 :.-
15
5
17
9
7
55
9
34
35
32
23
19
44
29
40
33
27
27
12
-
32
29
IB
28
22
8
14
23
5
9
9
5
38
8
28
31
23
7
15
40
24
34
43
22
10
12
-
19
-
SAMPLING
2A 2B
31
24
21
56 -
40
5
13
9
20
27
6
22
24
14
4
16
44
30
41
40
39
11
45
-
74
19
27
13
31
_ 25
27
5
7
5
13
25
5
18
25
17
2
8
35
21
31
35
28
8
27
-
34
66
LOCATION
3A 3B
67
13
27
-24--
24
5
5
27
19
38
10
18
18
35
8
27
38
20
46
40
30
12
30
-
50
-
43
14
21
44
54
6
21
35
27
54
9
-
15
23
: 3
5
36
17
30
25
13
15
14
-
39
28
4A
49
25
23
24
24
5
19
14
10
24
24
-
15
39
2
4
36
17
31
44
23
10
18
-
41
7
4B
42
19
29
- 46 -
25
5
15
14
10
-
21
-
22
13
5
11
36
15
33
27
13
14
17
-
32
- '
*Sampling location 3 represents the influent to the aquaculture treat-
ment system. Subsamples A & B represent: A - Experimental cells containing
fish, B - Corresponding control cells without fish.
**A11 values expressed as mg/1.
' 26
-------
TABLE A-2.
COD DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
.3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
75
65
128
79
82
69
109
54
-
211
119
153
140
225
160
231
232
221
202
122
185
192
-
119
119
141
1A
68
53
72
49
68
44
68
62
38
80
80
101
92
123
78
87
116
117
157
212
120
87
94
63
90
85
IB
57
57
60
-
72
45
68
54
42
77
80
112
120
100
41
81
112
117
152
209
143
96
87
71
67
82
2A
46
_
79
-
75
53
76
66
61
77
69
78
92
123
49
104
94
112
146
242
104
98
128
119
116
96
2B
61
61
75
43
68
47
49
58
38
65
61
75
85
58
17
71
86
91
146
201
100
75
87
41
82
96
3A
89
46
83
-
97
66
38
73
49
130
100
78
81
138
41
117
94
106
131
157
103
100
98
119
112
71
3B
82
65
75
-
82
59
57
46
53
66
65
60
65
_
11
57
52
69
112
146
60
70
68
52
-
108
4A
82
46
79
-
72
65
68
70
46
103
119
71
80
123
3
54
66.
95
105
100
97
85
84
48
108
63
4B
86
46
75
-
90
52
60
58
38
42
80
60
77
59
18
61
75
73
112
103
58
71
94
45
108
115
27' .'''.
-------
TABLE A-3. TOC DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1 / 1 t - - -
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
. Inf
32.
34.
-
-
-
31.
31.
36.
21.
40.
~ 29.
58.
59.
15.
-
60.
-
75.
66.
31.
no.
116.
14.
82.
66.
100.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o -
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0:
0
0
0
0
0
1A
30.0
23.0
3.0
-
-
29.0
-
20.0
12.0
,19.0
20.0
46.0
-
31.0
30.0
22.0
29.0
67.0
84.0
96.0
33.0
14.0
25.0
27.0
27.0
IB
29.0
33.0
4.0
-
-
23.0
-
25.0
12.0
19.0
20.0
44.0
46.0
-
-
24.0
17.0
41.0
67.0
64.0
90.0
39.0
14.0
28.0
21.0
23.0
2A
30.0
31.0
4.0
-
-
22.0
-
18.0
20.0
16.0
""21 .0
44.0
36.0
-
,24.0
26.0
-
46.0
53.0
75.0
88.0
40.0
_
81.0
35.0
29.0
2B
29.0
32.0
5.0
-
-
22.0
24.0
17.0
12.0
16.0
~ 20: o~
45.0
29.0
-
-
21.0
8.0
34.0
55.0
67.0
74.0
27.0
14.0
16.0
24.0
29.0
3A
48.0
43.0
8.0
-
-
27.0
19.0
25.0
24.0
28.0
"29.0
35.0
31.0
-
-
34.0
-
43.0
46.0
90.0
68.0
44.0
13.0
82.0
37.0
17.0
3B
37.
25.
4.
-
-
26.
10.
21.
18.
22.
"23.
31.
38.
-
-
21.
1.
637.
54.
89.
20.
25.
14.
19.
30.
33.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4A
37.0
31.0
15.0
-
.
26.0
16.0
20.0
25.0
33.0
36.0"
28.0
24.0
-
-
14.0
12.0
-
41.0
71.0
38.0
34.0
13.0
16.0
33.0
17.0
4B
44.0
30.0
11.0
-
-
25.0
-
30.0
18.0
33.0
37.0
20.0
-
17.0
-
31.0
15.0
22.0
40.0
73.0
15.0
24.0
12.0
14.0
31.0
41.0
..28...
-------
TABLE A-4. SUSPENDED SOLIDS DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
.12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
i/n
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
12
12
19
18
9
222
40
29
19
53
16
48
74
40
48
28
38
37
42
14
47
85
31
20
20
22
1A
12
12
14
24
9
15
18
9
15
-
15
28
32
10
23
14
6079
18
37
113
20
40
51
25
13
14
IB
19
11
11
26
14
27
15
8
17
8
18
31
26
9
13
5
14
29
34
89
34
42
39
30
15
13.
2A
17
15
29
31
30
22
23
19
27
15
20
25
20
8
40
18
19
51
73
82
59
64
61
58
35
17
2B
15
20
30
33
21
43
10
15
44
-
41
24
19
5
15
14
16
17
48
66
31
29
116
67
22
18
3A
33
26
35
31
29
38
21
21
25
20
23
14
16
17
20
44
7066
49
103
19
57
75
44
42
29
17
3B
23
26
23
36
40
55
200
28
22
12
n
27
19
7
19
15
6
25
34
37
52
34
19
26
44
35
4A
49
36
35
41
23
27
20
47
38
13
40
26
29
22
15
7
14
76
78
33
101
71
25
22
17
16
4B
27
33
28
35
32
24
37
26
17
31
23
22
6
20
19
2080
12
39
31
27
27
. 39
16
39
24
-------
TABLE A-5. DISSOLVED SOLIDS DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/12
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
742
789
719
678
726
694
765
712
694
770
790
824
735
708
798
716
751
856
792
802
785
808
787
809
799
773
1A
762
771
691
681
707
703
756
729 .
771
743
691
776
724
677
706
740
670
726
752
774
810
824
824
845
800
810
IB
743
737
631
695
705
697
776
738
761
725
823
791
833
.660
576
671
614
603
628
770
714
749
829
839
807
797
2A
783
751
745
742
737
806
763
763
756
760
819
831
763
681
409
574
557
726
658
724
772
806
825
848
807
944
2B
779
757
764
693
721
710
782
755
766
781
802
813
732
656
445
667
563
676
706
758
797
819
852
883
807
841
3A '
811
812
755
740
812
739
750
807
776
806
831
810
775
602
369
568
729
584
641
692
751
757
396
792
791
820
3B
802
785
727
743
747
768
777
768
795
460
834
856
842
765
654
661
476
637
673
694
710
779
819
831
822
844
. 4A
835
811
782
743
719
743
777
790
794
755
826
803
738
600
372
511
586
662
669
664
693
705
742
734
755
787
48
826
786
753
725
773
743
757
793
787
807
743
834
771
657
588
706
619
514
637
659
727
627
714
763
787
816
30
-------
TABLE A-6. SETTLEABLE SOLIDS DATA SAMPLED
" DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
I 3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.1
-
0.5
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.5 '
0.1
2.0
0.7
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
1A
00.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
O.T
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
IB
753
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
2A
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.8
1.1
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
2B
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
3A
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0,1
0.1
0.4
0.5
1.4
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
38
0.1
26.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.5
0.9
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
4A
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.9
1.0
0.4
0.9
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
4B
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.7
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
-------
" TABLE A-7. VOLATILE SUSPENDED
SOLIDS DATA SAMPLED
DURING .
OPERATIONAL CONDITION-! : :
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78 "
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
. 5
12
16
-
-
200
17
22
6
" 43 ~
15
33
51
41
20
30
26
33
13
39
69
25 :
10
10
17
1A
5
8
9
-
-
10
3
4
7 ...
- -
14
15
29
. 22
12
6070
11
29
57
20
25
19
7
7
13
IB
8
9
9
-
-
10
1
5
7
"4~
13
17
24
12
4
11
19
25
53
27
28
18
8
8
9
2A
10
13
23
-
9
-
7
8
15
' " 14
16 .
9
19
36
16
16
14
33
49 ,
26 i
42
48
40
40
15
2B
5
12
25
-
-5
16
8
5
24
'
32
9
14
14
10
. 15
10
21
52
25
20
34
15
15
17
3A
22
16 .
31
-
V7
28
6
10
13
19-
16
10
15
19
29
6140
17
42
16
32
45 '
29
32
32
:li:
3B
10
.19
17
-
1-5
26
179
13
14
~10"
10
15
18
15
11
2
11
23
32
12
19
12
14
14
: : 28 :
. 4A
40
26
..." 33
-
-7
34
8
23
23
~ "10"
28
13
20
13
2
13
17
30
22
35
41
11
14
14....
: .: ::TQ: .
. 4B
18
..25
.20
-
V2
23
10
18
13
" 13 "
23
17
21
17
14
2076
5
21
21
11
17
25
6
.... 6
:19
32.
-------
TABLE A-8. AMMONIA NITROGEN DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/1 V"
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
18.94
28.79
30.32
24.86
22.62
27.87 .
29.34
23.28
22.35
30.04
"25.46 "
22.89
24.28
24.57
19.09
20.49
22.44
24.67
27.01 ;
22.71
23.34 1
22.00
25.96
28.09 :
23.62
22.53
1A
19.
22.
28.
23.
21.
26.
28.
27.
24.
29.
"26.
24.
22.
21.
19.
20.
20.
20.
22.
17.
15.
14.
21.
23.
21.
16.
09
53
21
07
49
56
54
76
47
46.
80
67
98
40
39
74
17
82
44
78
92
54
49
81
07
18
IB
19.01
23.27
23.04
23.90
22.53
25.96
28.54
27.44
24.18
.28.43
26.07
24.09
23.43
22.09
15.25
19.32
20.74
21,74
22.98
19.47
17.16
15.13
22.00
24.36
25.96
22.18
2A
15.86
19.01
19.94
14.54
11.66
14.43
17.99
19.32
18.42
23.53
" 21.91
22.00
24.18
20.66
10.16
12.67
14.60
14.77
15.25
10.08
6.08
4.78
4.00
2.89
9.61
4.33
2B
15.99
20.01
18.42
17.57
15.37
18.14
20.66
21.74
19.54
24.76
22.35
22.47
24.86
19.62
11.39
19.32
14.77
17.37
17.71
12.72
11.52
7.67
12.62
18.06
18.28
12.18
3A
9.20
11.89
6.71
2.95
1.89
1.93
5.05
8.50
9.42
14.20
15.86
20.09
23.25
20.74
-
13.60
13.71
12.13
12.18
5.58
3.17
2.34
1.29
0.15
1.99
1.90
38
10.52
13.13
10.24
5.44
4.42
7.58
11.39
12.57
11.85
17.43
16.83
20.57
23.16
19.09
10.78
17.30
12.57
14.72
11.89
7.15
7.46
4.49
.3.94
3.83
6.40
2.16
4A
3.16
4.65
0.20
0.29
0.65
0.23
0.46
1.75
2.43
5.55
7.15
14.77
17.43
16.37
5.57
9.57
10.44
10.44
9.06
1.83
1.04
0.28
1.71
0.10
0.20
0.91
4B
6
8
5
1
0
2
4
5
4
9
9
14
17
15
9
13
11
12
8
3
4
2
0
0
0
0
.06
.44
.26
.64
.19
.01
.11
.36
.74
.24
.57.
.43
.03
.92
.36
.39
.43
.47
.50
.39
.54
.23
.12
.40
.51
.19
-------
TABLE A-9. NITRATE AND NITRITE DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-1
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
i/n --
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5 .
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
"0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1A
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.9
0.2 .
" 0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Q.I
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
IB
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.7
1.0
0.3
"2.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
2A
1.6
1.0
8.5
4.6
6.4
6.3
4.1
3.9
5.0
3.0
- ~2.5~
0.4
0.2
1.1
0.9
1.5
1.4
2.T
1.2
1.6
1.3
1.3
2.3
2.1
2.6
2.6
2B
1.2
0.1
7.4
1.8
3.0
3.8
2.8
3.4
4.5
2.7
~~5.0
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.4
1.3
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.4
0.4
0.2
2.2
2.2
3A
7.0
6.3
16.6
10.3
11.7
11.1
2.7
8.4
8.8
8.1
""" "3.9"
1.8
0.8 .:
1.6
1.1
1.6
2.0
'3.0
2.5
3.8
2.7
1.9
1.6
0.7
1.8
: 1.8
3B
3.5
1.9
1.3
9.1
8.0
6.3
4.7
4.6
5.4
6.4
5.7
1.7
1.0
1.6
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.6
1.7
1.4
0.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
4.0
.4.0
4A
8.1
9.3
14.4
8.4
7.5
8.1
8.1
7.8
9.8
9.5
4.0
3.8
2.3
3.6
1.8
3.1
2.8
3.4
2.6
4.0
2.6
1.3
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
4B
3.0
3.2
1.5
7.0
9.4
5.7
5.0
4.9
5.1
5.0
4.6
2.8
1.9
2.9
1.8
2.4
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.4
0.5
0.6
0.1
5.4
4.4
4.4
34
-------
TABLE A-10. -ORGANIC:NITROGEN:DATA.SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11 -
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
8.56
4.67
0.20
4.30
10.15
4.90
4.93
6.95
3.07
4.27
"10.75
3.65
13.22
12.03
10.94
11.69
11.49
10.12
8.87
11,02
11.76
15.12
12.33
9.38
9.45
12.85
1A
7.53
4.70
1.65
4.18
5.29
3.01
2.26
2.45
0.33
0.32.
"" 5.03
0.53
9.42
8.75
6.63
7.46
6.52
6.85
7.63
14.63
8.19
7.79
5.33
7.06
6.71
1.52
IB
8.48
4.52
4.04
3.00
4.93
3.53
2.93
2.31
0.86
0.78
6.20
1.55
9.72
7.92
3.91
5.07
6.09
6.97
8.07
13.82
9.77
9.23
5.86
5.95
5.20
8.70
2A
8.60
4.25
0.15
3.01
6.19
4.10
4.52
3.70
2.28
1.00
"" 4.81 "
1.18
6.86
8.76
4.56
7.21
5.42
7.27
8.07
16.30
7.59
6.24
5.98
8.27
8.03
7.12
2B
8.21
4.16
3.21
4.02
5.31
3.78
3.31
2.88
1.53
0.61
"5.24
1.38
6.49
8.05
3.19
5.63
4.96
5.71
6.85
14.14
6.09
6.82
5.11
5.74
7.44
7.53
3A
7.84
0.07
4.02
4.89
4.89
4.84
4.13
3.46
3.47
3.38
"5.77"
0.07
6.15
9.27
-
9.24
6.87
8.01
6.58
10.19
6.13
6.50
6.59
7.05
7.80
3.74
3B
6.52
6.19
3.81
15.80
5.41
4.50
3.95
4.30
2.90
0.85
5.07
2.49
1.59
7.99
3.33
5.40
3.59
4.98
6.05
8.47
5.36
5.37
5.59
5.71
8.08
7.75
4A
5.64
6.98
6.54
3.86
5.44
4.28
5.24
5.08
2.89
3.94
" 8.47'
8.27
5.96
11.59
1.99
3.25
4.74
6.60
6.12
6.93
8.12
5.37
5.85
4.59
5.61
4.93
4B
7.69
5.34
5.36
7.24
6.02
4.11
4.84
5.01
4.55
2.95
6.63
7.97
7.72
7.38
3.84
5.36
6.38
2.23
7.08
6.98
5.32
5.07
5.98
4.73
7.72
6.51
35..
-------
TABLE A-ll. KJELDAHL NITROGEN DATA SAMPLED.DURING.OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date.
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11"."
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
27.
33.
30.
29.
30.
32.
34.
31.
25.
34.
~36.
26.
37.
36.
30.
32.
33.
34.
35.
33.
35.
37.
38.
37.
33.
35.
5. -
1
5
1
1
8
3
2
5
3
2" -
5
5
6
0 :
2
9
8
9
7
1 !
1
3
8
1
4
1A
26.6
33.4
29.9
27.2
26.8
29.6
30.8
30.2
24.8
29. a
31.8 "
25.2
32.4
30.1
26.0
28.2
26.7
27.7
30.1
32.4
24.1
22.3
26.8
30.9
27.8
17.7
IB
27.5
33.3
27.0
26.9
27.4
29.5
31.5
29.7
25.0...
29.2
"32,. 3 ~
25.6
33.1
30.0
19.2
24,4
26.8
28.7
31.0
33.3
26.9
24.4
27.9
31.3
31.2
30.9
2A
24.4
23.3
20.0
17.5
17.8
18.5
22.5
23.0
20.7
24.5
"26.7
23.2
31.0
29.4
14.7
19.9
20.0
22.0
23.3
26.3
13.7
11.0
9.0
11.2
17.6
11.4
2B
17.0
24.2
21.6
21.6
20.7
21.9
23.0
24.6
21.1
25.4
"2/;6"
23.8
31.3
27.7
14.6
24.9
20.7
23.1
24.6
26.9
17.7
14.5
17.7
23.8
25.7
19.7
3A
17.0
17.0
10.7
7.8
6.8
6.8
9.2
11.0
12.9
17.6
"22 .'6
20.2
29.4
30.0
12.6
22.8
20.6
20.0
18.8
15.8
9.3
8.8
7.9
7.2
9.8
5.6
3B
8.8
19.3
14.0
21.2
9.8
12.1
15.3
16.9
14.7
18.3
"2T.9
23.1
24.7
27.0
14.0
22.7
16.1
19.7
17.9
5.2
12.8
9.9
9.5
9.5
14.5
9.9
4A
8.
11.
6.
4.
6.
4.
5.
6.
8
3
7
1
1
5
7
8
5. .3
9.
"~ 15.
23.
23.
27.
7.
12.
15.
17.
15.
8.
9.
5.
7.
4.
5.
.5.
5
6
0
4
0
5
8
2
0
2
7
2
6
3
7
8
8
4B
13.7
13.8
10.6
8.9
6.2
7.1
8.0
10.4
9.3
12.2
~ 16.2
22.4
24.7
23.3
13.3
18.7
17.8
14.7
15.6
10.4
9.9
7.4
6.1
5.1
8.2
.6.7
-------
TABLE A-12. TOTAL NITROGEN DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78-
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
27
33
30
29
32
34
31
25
- 34
36
26
37
36
30
32
33
34
35
33
35
37
38
37
33
.10
.44
.55
.23
.79
-
.27
.23
.42
.31 ~
.21
.74
.50
.80
.03
.18
.93
.78
.88
.73
.20
.12
.39
.48
.17
-
1A
27.02
27.33
30.12
27.44
27.05
29.80
31.10
30.71
25.70
29.97
32.13
25.30
32.40
30.45
26.12
28.20
26.79
27.77
30.08
32.61
24.71
22.43
26.92
30.97
28.28
-
IB
27.80
27.89
27.23
27.00
27.81
29.79
31.77
30.45
26.04
29.51
35.07
25.64
33.15
30.01
19.36
24.49
26.93
28,81
31.05
33.39
27.13
24.46
27.96
31.41
31.26
30.98
2A
26.02
24.27
28.59
22.15
24.21
24.83
26.61
26.92
25.70
"' 27.53
29.22
23.58
31.25
30.32
15.62
21.38
21.42
24.15
24.52
27.88
14.97
12.32
12.28
13.27
20.04
14.05
2B
25.40
24.28
29.06
23.39
23.68
25.72
26.77
28.02
25.58
28.08
32.59
24.25
31.55
28.97
14.98
25.35
22.03
24.28
25.46
27.76
18.42
15.90
18.13
24.01
26.62
21.92
3A
24
24
27
18
18
17
11
20
21
" 25
26
20
30
31
13
24
22
23
21
19
12
10
9
7
11
7
.05
.26
.39
.15
.50
.88
.88
.37
.69
.68
.53
.96
.20
.61
.68
.44
.58
.14
.26
.57
.00
.74
.49
.90
.99
.45
3B
20.55
21.22
15.33
30.34
17.87
18.39
20.04
21.47
20.15
24.69
27.60
24.77
25.75
28.68
15.21
23.80
17.26
21 ,30
19.64
17.02
13.63
11.56
11.13
11.05
17.58
13.92
4A
16.90
20.43
21.18
12.55
13.60
12.62
13.81
14.64
15.13
19.00
19.62
26.85
25.70
31.50
9.37
15.93
17.98
20.45
17.78
12.76
11.76
6.95
7.80
4.80
5.92
5.84
4B
16.75
16.98
18.09
15.89
15.60
12.83
13.96
15.27
14.40
17.19
20.81
25.20
26.65
26.20
15.10
21.15
19.41
16.50
17.09
11.77
10.37
7.99
6.20
10.54
9.73
11.11
...37.'..
-------
TABLE A-13. TOTAL PHOSPHORUS DATA SAMPLED DURING:OPERATIONAL:CONDITIQN-2
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/6
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11 - -
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
10.8
12.0
10.9
11.2
10.6 .
10.9
12.9
9.9
9.0
11.0
-12.1-
11.6
12.6
12.2
10.5
10.0 :"
12.2
11.4
12.4
11.0
12.0
15.5
- :
-
0.3 :
11.7
1A
11.3
12.0
10.5
11.1
10.3
10.0
12.7
9.2
8.9
10.4
- IT. 5*
12.5
11.9
10.4
9.6
10.8
10.3
10.1
10.6
10.7
11.1
14.5
-
-
1.5
9.0
IB
11.3
11.3
11.2
11.0
9.8
10.6
13.0
9.2
9.0
11.3
-11-.-3-
11.9
11.4
10.5
8.7
9.2
10.6
10.1
11.4
12.4
11.5
13.7
-
-
0.3
11.5
2A
11.3
12.3
12.3
11.4
9.4
9.5
12.3
9.2
9.0
9.9
11.2
11.1
11.1
10.3
6.2
8.4
9.1
9.2
9.3
10.1
9.7
13.6
-
-
0.5
5.3
2B
11.3
10.2
11.2
11.0
10.1
10.4
12.5
9.4
9.5
10.0
-10.9-
11.3
11.2
10.2
6.8
10.2
8.5
9.5
10.2
10.1
12.0
13.5
-
_
1.6
4.6
3A
11.2
11.5
11.2
10.9
9.9
9.6
11.6
8.0
8.9
9.6
- 10.9
1.0
11.4
10.5
6.0
8.8
9.7
8.6
8.9
9.1
9.0
13.4
-
_
1.7
4.4
3B
12.0 .
9.0
11.3
12.3
10.8
10.1
12.3
9.4
9.6
10.0
-11.2-
10.7
11.9
-
6.3
9.5
7.8
8.8
9.2
8.8
10.3
14.5
-
. -
1.7
4.8
4A
12.7
12.7
15.2
13.5
8.7
10.8
13.2
9.0
9.0
9.8
10.4
10.3
10.3
11.0
3.5
6.3
9.2
9.1
9.3
9'. 2
9.8
9-4
-
_
'1.5
2.6
4B
12.7
12.2
11.0
11.3
12.3
9.1
12.3
9.7
9.8
10.0
- 10.7
10.5
10.8
9.8
7.0
9.9
10.7
8.0
9.1
6.5
8.9
7.6
-
_
2.2
1.1
.38
-------
"TABLE A-14. ORTHO PHOSPHATE DATA SAMPLED"DURING:OPERATIONAL CONDITION-1
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4
1/11- -
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
10.65
11.18
10.60
10.12
10.26
10.43
8.98
8.57
9.87
11.00
- T0.99
10.42
10.35
10.30
8.51
9.42
11.03
10.17
11.02
11.49
10.81.
11.43
10.75
11.20
-
9.90
1A
11.19
11.75
9.92
9.84
9.25
9.85
9.22
8.17
8.71
10.42
10.93
11.74
9.38
8.84
8.18
- 10.30
8.94
9.57
9.06
9.88
9.79
11.74
11.74
12.01
-
9.00
IB
11.25
11.20
10.66
9.94
9.45
10.48
9.31
8.50
8.95
10.23
-10.33"
10.96
9.79
9.57
6.95
9.18
9.18
10.03
9.91
10.68
10.93
10.80
12.34
12.89
-
10.87
2A
10.92
11.39
10.52
9.94
9.04
9.04
8.03
8.23
8.96
9.15
10. IQ-
ll. 07
9.56
9.50
5.22
8.06
7.10
7,79
9.13
8.79
8.69
10.19
6.84
6.41
- .
5.01
2B
11.20
10.20
12.13
9.85
9.38
9.72
9.52
8.50
4.59
9.75
~10;53~
11.34
10.19
9.34
5.46
9.45
7.22
8.73
9.17
10.00
10.61
10.18
12.15
12.96
-
4.43
3A
11.00
10.88
10.80
10.12
8.58
9.23
8.84
8.44
8.46
9.23
9.45
10.31
10.10
10.18
4.22
8.59
7.87
8.26
7.91
8.63
9.36
10.03
7.75
4.66
.
4.42
3B
11.64
9.54
10.80
11.42
10.26
9.65
8.96
8.77
9.27
9.51
"9.81 -
10.60
10.58
5.87
9.04
6.61
8.09
8.01
8.05
5.41
9.36
9.21
8.77
_
4.32
4A
12.50
12.42
14.50
10.79
8.10
10.39
9.11
9.04
9.58
9.07
9.67'
10.12
9.15
9.58
3.08
6.01
8.29
8.07
8.49
8.29
8.99
7.90
5.06
2.36
_
2.50
4B
9.50
11.41
10.79
10.06
11.47
8.57
8.45
8.98
9.72
9.48
" 7.01
10.04
7.79
8.87
6.56
9.42
8.68
8.45
7.96
5.67
8.57
6.91
3.10
3.58
_
0.35
;.;:.39..._..;
-------
TABLE A-15. TOTAL ALKALINITY DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
198
212
198
208
221
229
217
219
240
230
234
232
206
245
191
197
263
233
223
209
258
219
168
119
234
207
1A
207
206
190
201
198
224
220
225
235
233
237
250
193
222
186
155
221
200
199
187
159
205
148
145
229
160
IB
210
228
198
210
201
226
223
228
237
233
234
256
204
222
140
155
233
215
208
196
162
208
155
148
259
191
2A
192
207
185
156
137
149
162
184
195
202
234
247
204
228
107
83
169
115
150
149
109
133
62
151
183
81
2B
201
217
166
178
170
187
192
202
215
227
217
256
211
239
115
138
177
171
169
171
123
188
117
287
211
124
3A
159
179
86
108
80
91
83
123
149
. 152
175
219
204
228
90
105
180
130
125
112
103
135
59
140
129
87
3B
.183
200
109
147
128
140
141
172
189
180
194
235
205
236
124
128
151
146
135
132
103
152
77
127
134
57
4A
136
163
103
108
121
100
83
m
130
114
147
185
167
216
78
83
166
138
119
107
106
138
74
in
146
87
4B
165
189
148
144
90
128
123
87
171
170
178
210
180
210
137
128
189
141
138
114
106
147
59
176
140
61
I- '__: 40.__:.
-------
TABLE A-16. "P" ALKALINITY SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
'12/21
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IB
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
3B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4A
0
0
0
0
4
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
36
2
4B
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
11
: 41
-------
TABLE A-17. pH DATA SAMPLED:DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-1
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/T
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10/78
5/17 :
Inf 1
8.1
7.5
7.3
7.3
7.8
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.5
7.4
... 7;r_
7.4
7.2
7.2
7.5-
6.9
7.0
7.5
7.2
7.6 ,
7.3 ;
7.4
7.2
7.6:
7.2
7.1:^: :
1A
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.5
7.9
7.5
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.6 . .
"7.8 -
7.4
7.7
7.7
7.5
7.3
7.2
7.7
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.7
: 7.0:
IB
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.8
7.5
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.6
7.9"
7.5
7.7 .
7.8
7.6
7.6
7.1
7.7
7.3
7.3
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.2: :
2A
7.8
7.8
7.2
7.2
7.8
7.4
7.9
7.8
8.0
7.8
-.- 7-.g _.
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.6
7.9
7.1
7.5
7.3
7.3
7.3 ;
7.5 :
7.3 !
7.4 :
8.0 ;
: 7.3 ' :
2B
7.8
7.7
7.2
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.7
8.0 "
7.7
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.5
7.6
7.5
7.2
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.6
8.1
:7.l::
3A
7.6
7.7
7.0
7.2
7.6
7.6
7.7
7.8
8.1
8.1
- 8.0 ~
8.0
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.5
7.0
7.5
7.2
7.2
7.1
7.9
7.4
7.7
8.5
: : :7.3: : :
3B
8.0
8.1
7.5
7.0
8.8
7.9
7.7
7.9
8.1
8.0
8;o~~
7.9
7.8
7.8
.8.0
7.4
7.0
7.5
8.2
7.2
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.4
8.0
:7.4: :
4A
7.1
7.6
7.4
7.5
8.4
8.5
7.9
7.9
8.1
8.4
' 7.8 '
7.8
7.9
7.7
7.5
8.5
7.1
7.6
7.3
7.3
7.2
8.1
7.5
8.5
9.6
: 8.4
4B
8.4
8.4
7.3
7.3
8.1
8.3
7.9
8.1
8.5
8.4
7.9
8.2
7.9
7.4
7.8
7.9
7.0
7.1
8.3
7.7
7.4
8.1
8.3
7.8
9.1
9.1
42.
-------
TABLE A-18. DISSOLVED OXYGEN DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
.4/12. ,
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
InfT
19.8
1.4
0.2
3.6
3.0
3.8
5.7
5.5
6.6
4.9
8.1
2.9
2.3
1.9
.1.5
1.9
2.3
1.4
0.9
1.3
10.6
1.9'
7.6
1.2
3.6
1A
4.4
1.2
3.4
11.2
4.8
2.8
6.6
5.9
7.2
5.8
7.2 '
2.3
1.7
6.3
14.0
3.8
2.8
7.7
20.1
17.0
4.4
2.8
2.5
6.9
3.6
IB
3.9
1,6
3.1
4.4
2.8
3.1
7.2
6.1
7.7
5.8
6.8
2.4
1.4
10.4
-
6.0
4.2
7.5
16.2
6.9
5.8
2.6
1.7
1.8
2.6
2A
5.9
4.0
2.3
7.2
6.3
6.0
11.2
9.6
11.2
10.6
11.4
5.3
0.5
9.8
20.1
13.8
3.0
12.8
17.1
6.7
8.0
9.5
20.1
11.4
10.2
2B
6.0
4.0
4.9
6.9
5.5
6.4
10.8
8.4
9.9
7.5
9.6
3.1
1.7
19.6
11.8
20.1
11.8
: 12.0
17.5
8.4
8.8
3.8
: 3.3
' 13.4
10.8
3A
9.9
4.Q
2.5
6.9
7.3
9.0
11.6
10.4
11.8
.J3.3 _
14.4
9.1
7.4
15.2
20.1
13.6
12.6
3.0
14.9
4.7
7.6
9.3
20.1
10.4
24.0
38
13.8
6,0
4.9
6.8
8.8
9.8
12.0
10.6
12.2
13.8
16.4
13.2
8.9
13.1
16.2
18.6
13.0
15.5
16.4
5.8
11.0
9.2
15.2
11.2
12.4
4A
12,2
4.Q
7.4
8.6
9.3
11.2
13.5
11.4
11.8
_ 14.4
7.2
13.8
11.8
15.4
20.1
14.8
12.4
4.4
17.0
6.6
9.2
9.1
12.5
15.6
4.3
4B
15.6
10.0
6.8
9.2
10.8
11.6
13.6
12.2
12.0
.16.4
0.5
20.0
17.2
15.2
20.1
-
12.6
16.4
13.2
5.2
11.6
10.2 '
18.2
12.4
11.8
4-3
-------
TABLE A-19. TEMPERATURE DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78
1/11
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
Infl
19
63
15
12
15
10
5
9
4
5
4
5
4
4
5
6
5
11
17
19
17
15
21
19
23
1.A
15
63
13
11
14
9
2
10
2
3
3
1
0
2
1
3
5
9
17
18
18
14
20
19
25
IB
15
63
14
11
14
7
2
7
2
3
2
1
0
0
8
4
3
9
17
18
16
14
19
19
24
2A
16
63
12
10
14
7
2
7
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
2
3
9
17
18
16
14
21
19
25
2B
16
63
13
11
13
6
1
6
2
2
1
1
0
0
15
2
2
9
17
18
15
14
21
19
24
3A
16
63
13
11
13
6
0
6
2
2
1
0
0 '
0
1
2
2
9
17
18
15
14
21
19
24
3B
, 17
63
13
11
14
6
1
6
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
9
17
18
15
14
21
19
23
4A
17
63
13
10
13
5
1
6
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
2
9
17
18
14
14
31
19
23
46
16
62
13
9
13
5
2
6
1
1.
1
0
0
0
1
7
2
10
17
19
14
14
21
19
23
:, 44
-------
TABLE A-20. FECAL COLIFORM DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-!
Date
10/19/77
10/26
11/2
1/0
11/16
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
1/4/78-
1/11
1/25
Infl
x!05
0.61
0.66
7.00
2.30
1.20
0.20
0.31
0.80
0.10
0.66
0.11
1.20
2/1 130.00
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/29
4/5
4/12
4/19
4/26
5/10
5/17
17.00
15.00
-
15.60
15.00
18.00
6.70
- '
1.90
2.60
8.00
19.00
0.70
1A,
xlO4
2.20
1.20
4.00
3.40
1.20
0.70
0.21
1.40
0.10
1.90
0.24
1.20
1.50
0.21
7.20
-
2.20
1.80
2.10
2.90
-
3.30
0.24
3.10
1.70
0.60
IB.
xlO4
1.70
1.10
1.50
2.30
2.70
0.30
1.90
0.90
0.10
1.40
0.01
0.86
4.30
0.22
0.03
-
5.00
2.90
2.20
2.60
-
3.00
0.54
1.00
0.15
0.36
2A-
x!0J
2.10
2.30
1.30
2.20
2.60
1.40
0.80
2.00
0.10
- 8.50
-
7.60
3.30
0.60
0.10
-
9.20
1.40
4.50
3.10
-
1.60
0.10
0.90
0.76
0.32
2B3
x!0J
0.90
1.50
1.30
3.70
5.50
1.20
1.90
0.30
0.10
5.10
0.10
6.80
6.70
0.40
0.40
-
20.00
8.00
17.00
11.00
'-
5.50
0.10
2.10
0.27
0.90
3A,
xlO^
2
5
2
6
11
3
1
20
1
25
28
40
21
9
1
-
42
37
78
60
- -
100
18
1
2
0
.00
.00
.80
.70
.00
.20
.60
.00
.80
.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.30
.82
3B2
xlO^
2.00
2.00
1.40
10.70
9.40
1.70
0.70
0.60
0.10
6.80
0.10
28.00
15.00
1.00
1.00
-
50.00
10.00
16.00
7.00
-
3.00
1.00
1.00
0.56
0.62
4A,
xlO^
0.16
6.80
0.20
2.70
0.70
0.10
0.48
3.80
0.16
6.80
0.24
2.10
0.12
0.90
0.10
-
0.10
3.10
1.00
3.40
-
7.00
0.06
0.02
0.04
0.84
4B
xlO2
0.
1.
0.
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
8.
0.
4.
20.
4.
0.
-
12.
23.
36.
9.
-
2.
1.
1.
0.
0.
36
50
20
70
60
10
10
32
26
50
60
20
00
50
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
30
02
.45:
-------
APPENDIX. B
TABLE B-1. BODs DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
5/24/78
6/28
7/5
7/12
7/24 ..
7/26
8/2
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
Infl
38
36
54
94
-
63
67
32
31
50
83
48
30
24 .
285
14
8
20
8
68
102
10
13
37
10
61
136
59
148
112
50
98
56
60
1A
44
56
22
43
-
101
78
53
53
- 40
39
38
27
16
94
24
8
12
41
40
32
10
10
10
10
30
50
59
54
55
55
61
40
48
IB
31
52
27
51
96 " "
84
44
67
49
52
13
16
17
142
32
8
8
49
47
30
10
10
14
10
37
46
61
63
60
68
80
66
60
2A
58
54
17
35
-
"51 '
32
64
40
40
42
15
11
15
122
29
10
6
46
43
32
10
10
10
10
13
27
34
27
-50
16
39
45
47
2B
73
80
14
30
-
46
22
57
39
38
40
21
16
9
123
29
11
13
: 50
41
32
10
10
10
10
19
28
35
24
22
10
34
85
87
3A
26
33
10
41
-
... .._._
31
51
26
37
25
10
11
10
97
89
11
13
57
41
36
10
10
10
10
16
25
19
23
29
17
20
53
22
3B
54
34
TO
24
-
46
33
34
-
44
35
24
20
17
116
35
17
20
60
53
38
10
10
10
10
19
14
26
22
17
10
19
76
39
4A
15
37
10
32
-
"48
21
47
23
40
22
21
16
6
121
25
15
14
50
35
32
10
10
10
10
28
22
19
14
28
11
37
46
- 24
4B
40
34
19
37
-
47
37
38
20
52
37
35
20
20
131
26
19
23
53
44
38
10
10
10
10
26
18
22
19
16
17
38
26
41
(Continued)
..46 ...
-------
TABLE B-l
Date
3/28/79
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
128
93
76
420
140
34
1A
84
33
74
42
77
99
IB
76
76
96
87
100
19
2A
50
74
48
53
47
45
2B
52
65
54
137
30
11
3A
31
36
76
37
40
67
3B
49
25
29
30
28
37
4A
26
26
64
36
35
59
4B
48
37
57
33
37
55
47
-------
TABLE B-2.
COD DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL
CONDITION-2
Date
5/24/77
6/28
7/5
7/12
7/24
7/26
8/2
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30-
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
n/i
n/8
11/15
n/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
98.
143.
135.
140.
75.
82.
78.
112.
109.
155.
-143.
122.
61.
88.
108.
82.
99.
70.
no.
109.
139.
50.
96.
TOO.
103.
142.
338.
70.
229.
245.
139.
160.
153.
136.
223.
168.
126.
701.
175.
-
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
o -
0
0
6
1 .
1
6
0
3
1
9
0
9
4.
5
9:
4
6
0
8
3
5
0'
4
7
6
7
2
3
1A
95.0
103.0
85.0
132.0
160.0
187.3
182.0
112.0
158.0
123.0
- 89.0
122.0
103.0
66.4
. 75.1
85.8
73.8
66.3
74.1
69.8
73.4
30.8
54.3
50.2
61.3
109.0
154.1
66.9
133.5
136.1
127.7
145.1
145.3
132.6
145.9
137.9
134.5
127.0
186.8
172.0
IB
87.0
88.0
88.0
117.0
164.0
187.3
163.0
134.0
155.0
143.0
109.0
85.0
103.0
77.5
108.1
111.9
70.1
73.7
81.4
69.8
73.4
38.5
58.1
57.9
84.3
109.0
154.1
81.8
148.9
158.8
139.3
164.4
168.3
136.4
138.1
137.9
157.9
158.2
183.0
-
2A
114.0
103.0
73.0
113.0
82.0
142.3
89.0
87.0
98.0
111.0'
-74. a
85.0
76.0
73.8
89.7
85.8
73.8
62.6
92.2
85.1
73.4
53.9
46.5
46.3
46.0
67.7
116.5
74.4
84.0
121.0
88.9
118.0
141.5
140.2
95.3
134.1
134.5
99.6
117.5
76.0
2B
106.0
77.0
108.0
68.0
112.0
112.4
89.0
123.0
136.0
95.0
-109.0"
85.0
92.0
62.7
89.7
82.1
70.1
62.6-
84.0
66.2
69.6
34.6
81.4
54.1
61.3
89.5
97.7
104.1
80.2
104.0
65.8
129.6
141.5
200.8
130.4
118.8
122.8
228.5
102.1
-
3A
98.0
77.0
42.0
94.0
108.0
183.5
63.0
97.0
102.0
91.0
_ _
66.0
73.0
59.0
78.9
89.6
73.8
62.6
99.5
91.2
69.9
53.9
65.9
50.2
61.3
75.2
97.7
85.5
72.5
94.5
69.6
75.4
88.0
60.6
56.3
91.9
126.7
111.3
113.7
115.0
3B
98;
58.
69.
71.
71.
119.
74.
138.
102.
115.
~74':
96.
99.
66.
86.
108.
88.
66.
121.
80.
73.
46.
65.
54.
80.
82.
86.
145.
80.
83.
54.
83.
126.
128.
114.
57.
68.
68.
86.
-
0.
0
0
0
0
9
4
0
0
0
o
0
0
4
1
2
6
3
2
5
4
2
9
1
5
7
5
0
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
5
2
4
7
4A
72.0
73.0
54.0
94.0
75.0
116.1
71 ;o
153.0
143.0
95.0
-'
111.0
114.7
84.9
93.4
93.3
77.5
88.4
74-. 1
84.1
69.9
50.0
65.9
50.2
72.8
90.2
97.7
145.0
49.6
117.2
46.4
75.4
76.5
64.4
60.3
61.3
107.2
95.7
90.6
99.0
4B
117.0
96.0
40.0
102.0
119.0
153.1
164.0
112.0
162.0
147.0
"97.0
122.0
95.6
125.5
104.4
104.5
88.6
84.7
85.0
80.5
76.9
53.9
85.3
54.1
95.8
105.3
101.5
185.9
87.8
75.6
61.9
94.8
122.4
132.6
134.2
107.3
95.5
84.0
82.9
92.0
48.,
-------
TABLE B-3.
TOC DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8.
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/21
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
27
39
126
97
137
50
14
29
32
40
28
16
28
27
59
30
10
32
25
40
101
13
85
80
44
39
40
35
31
170
47
16
1A
60
46
146
75
36 .
43
24
18
15
24
16
18
16
15
14
8
7
12
11
30
43
12
45
54
38
31
41
30
62
35
50
42
IB
49
45
90
97
50
22
30
22
22
32
15
13
16
14
15
13
12
16
17
30
47
18
52
55
35
39
114
33
72
46
49
25
2A
34
38
102
75
892
24
20
23
23
24
22
20
22
23
20
20
7
11
8
13
33
13
22
44
28
25
63
92
37
34
31.
13
2B
34
47
150
72
81
25
21
22
19
23
16
14
22
13
14
11
9
14
10
17
32
25
26
30
34
26
13
5
30
79
17
65
3A
24
41
95
62
73
_
18
14
18
26
6
13
27
18
23
19
9
10
12
16
24
17
18
34
14
49
34
66
49
29
20 .
24
3B
48
36
80
77
66
27
22
18
21
32
18
23
31
25
22
21
15
12
13
21
21
27
22
35
13
78
13
27
13
13
11
13
4A
28
39
133
71
68
33
32
20
23
27
21
27
30
18
18
11
11
11
11
20
23
30
10
37
12
23
40
60
35
17
20
22
4B
54
52
135
108
91
48
30
38
26
35
41
24
23
17
22
18
16
12
24
26
22
48
25
32
18
27
63
25
20
47
19
17
-------
TABLE B-4. SUSPENDED SOLIDS DATA.SAMPLED DURING. OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
5/24/78
6/28
7/5
7/12
7/24
7/26
8/2
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30 "
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/2/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/15
4/25
5/9
Infl
28
27
74
65
-
24
26
23
22
44
.... gg ...
52
21
30
51
21
20
25
40
12 ;
-
17
46
32
34 ;
41
170
83
81
40
45
41
30
48
108
28
63
269
54
25
1A
12
21
22
36
-
173
98
13
23
17 .,
14
30
39
17
32
29
11
26
21
-
-
7
11
18
15
21
33
25
19
21
20
27
24
50
41
47
70
13
45
85
IB
10
30
22
41
-
61
53
15
26
- 29
22
17
40
23
45
43
24
22
27
10
8
8
16
25
17
41
20
34
29
19
24
29
31
36
44
36
73
29
57
23
2A
23
19
24
40
-
50
28
22
19
14
_ __17._.
17
25
24
50
25
17
23
26
39
22 =
15 '
12
16
13!
13 ;
20
15
14 <
15
38
39
28
61 .
49
69
59
6
32
19
2B
20
29
35
49
...
33
22
7
22
20
"17" ~
20
30
12
32
21
13
22
35
29
13
13
17
22
15
18
46
24
10
13
23
38
52
93
64
22
62
202
34
63
3A
14
30
22
39
-
107
20
4
17
16
~ ~35 ~
11
22
14
40
20
23
26
40
15
29
31
22
19
18
13
16
14
26
15
21
33
34
17
84
50
121
40
39
71
3B
46
11
27
44
-
57
19
5
24
32
" "11
32
41
28
42
43
27
51
60
41
43
27
36
24
30
32
19
21
33
13
28
33
58
62
109
23
84
49
49
57
4A
14
53
38
75
-
123
28
10
19
13
" "13 "
30
49
22
42
35
25.
45
44-
35 '
38,
17
15
26
17
29
23,
22*
9
13
15
20
32
36
36
34
48
47
47
59
4B
13
44
28
63
-
150
83
47
55
62
"~ 25
37
47
74
67
51
36
53
73
40
47
37
62
26
75
41
34
22
27
20
24
64
75
61
124
77
143
108
108
67
50
-------
TABLE B-5. DISSOLVED SOLIDS DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/14
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/24
5/9
Infl
774
683
867
786
813
375
790
721
767
733
797 -
738
764
739
977
717
744 :
764
770
795 :
772 !
567 .
631 '
635
737
803
824
829
843 ;
758
510 .
862
827
782
1A
893
799
842
836
846
835
807
776
1720
737 .
" 789
778
775
781
.. 748
729
745
752
790
845
778
707
728
696
693
721
811
847
792
802
799
809
815
714
IB
849
796
816
831
829
825
801
761
814
744
"780
846
774
77
748
724
759
738
784
834
786
662
726
705
699
716
776
797
827
818
796
818
813
734
2A
847
806
860
859
892
868
838
801
867
785
794 -
812
783
800
769
770
768
745
812
880
847
769
588
697
650
660
776
842
778
779
796
803
799
713
2B
870
820
836
872
858
849
822
801
867
771
"798
798
793
81
749
749
759
766
789
874
843
996
676
711
637
692
725
792
750
744
783
845
794
739
3A
863
830
1115
883
886
880
875
845
879
827
~ 819"
832
833
794
803
782
786
743
820
897
913
847
666
781
636
658
712
744
794
731
771
770
791
702
3B
869
828
828
883
1117
841
830
772
858
785
"807
816
777
846
768
776
773
764
800
882
905
861
724
732
819
634
696
707
700
706
739
746
759
688
4A
890
836
860
986
908
920
877
893
911
845
~ 880"
875
836
818
831
827
845
815
860
957
960
962
639
702
635
863
937
764
685
750
807
736
817
680
4B
824
830
859
416
881
876
854
849
894
812
"814
826
783
770
787
802
784
787
810
912
943
785
778
783
708
685
732
950
731
815
715
712
817
630
5T:
-------
TABLE B-6. SETTLEABLE SOLIDS DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2 .
-Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.9
0.4
0.4
~ o.r
0.5
0.5
3.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4 '
0.1 ,
0.3
0.5
0.0
0.4
1.0 .
1.8
0.5
0.7
1.2
0.3
1.0
1A
98,0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1 ...
"0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
IB
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
o.r
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
1.0
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
2A
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
" 0.1 ""
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.2 :
0.1
0.1
2B
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1 '
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
9.5
0.1
0.1
3A
0.2 .
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
~0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1 '
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.3
1.0
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.1 .
1.0
:-3B
o.i
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1 "
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
6.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
4A
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
.0.1...
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
4B
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.0
52
-------
TABLE B-7. VOLATILE SUSPENDED SOLIDS DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
16
16 :
18
34
54
40
14
22
34
19
-"- 18 -
15
40
9
-
15- '
14
18 .
33 '
33
145 .
58 ; .
69 .
31
32 ;
26 !
21 ;
27
93
32
42
213 :
41
25
1A
44
20
8
12
14
23
33
12
20
28
10 :."
17
20
1
-
6
6
1
15
16
30
18
15
18
16
10
18
42
44
54
60
13
40
83
IB
35
11
19
23
22
13
33
17
32
42
..23- -
14
27
5
2
9
10
11
17
33
17
27
24
16
20
15
20
25
62
29
61
26
58
22
2A
7
4
15
9
18
11
19
16
27
25
_ -13- _
14
26
16
10
12
7
2
13
7
17
11 ;
10 :
13 i
19
15
20
44
58
59
58 .
5 :
28 :
16
2B
8
6
18
14
15
15
22
7
18
20
. ] T_
10
35
6
3
10
9
8
15
15
17
18
7
10
18
25
37
72
63
20
45
145
21
24
3A
13
12
11
8
25
7
14
8
18
18
17 _.
13
39
8
15
17
8
.6
11
8
13
8
13
11
11
15
19
7
34
31
68
29
28
61
3B
14
3
7
17
10
20
27
17
23
30
.-21- -
27
51
14
11
15
14
7
16
23
14
15
19
8
17
19
47
54
56
22
21
14
18
20
4A
11
4
13
7
9
20
36
15
28
30
23 -
31
50
2
9
13
6
9
11
11
19
6
4
10
8
9
8
11
20
16
30
29
34
56
4B
69
33
44
20
18
31
31
53
45
39
- 25
30
47
11
13
1
17
7
27
25
26
13
18
13
14
25
48
34
72
30
40
23
32
37
53
-------
TABLE B-8. AMMONIA NITROGEN DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
18.14
17.16
14.77
13.60
16.43
18.72
7.70
17.44
12.28
15.61
39.90
17.57
15.55
25.56
19.32
14.77
-
27.33
20.25
20.41
20.33
9.06
18.00
20.25
18.10
19.80
20.20
15.00
18.90
17.10
8.90
12.60
6.11
16.00
1A
10.61
16.83
10.04
8.59
13.90
13.13
13.60
15.92
12.72
15.80
-16.24
14.20
11.89
15.67
... 17.44
18.28
20.33
20.17
21.92
24.76
25.86
6.77
23.50
24.10
25.10
24.10
25.10
19.20
19.10
19.70
20.30
19.02
20.49
13.00
IB
8.22
14.77
11.25
12.27
11.52
16.83
13.40
15.13
12.28
13.87
16.18
15.86
13.39
18.43
21.07
19.70
20.90
23.43
22.26
25.96
26.38
18.14
23.40
24.67
23.90
27.80
27.20
20.00
21.10
23.10
20 .'10
17.30
20.09
14.00
2A
0.88
10.82
9.13
3.50
4.92
7.71
8.67
6.71
2.98
7.21
_ 7>7r
7.24
4.51
4.62
4.38
9.17
11.04
14.49
14.15
17.50
27.01
15.25
17.60
23.43
19.50
16.20
18.20
14.70
14.30
12.40
10.00
9.39
15.31
14.00
2B
4.22
10.48
8.81
8.02
5.00
6.61
7.47
5.40
4.44
7.47
9.73
8.99
8.34
10.44
13.44
14.20
15.67
18.07
15.67
18.64
27.44
23.53
20.00
22.35
18.70
18.10
12.70
9.70
18.30
7.70
5.30
8.54
13.87
16.50
3A
0.61
4.69
5.46
0.71
0.58
0.42
1.49
0.85
0.16
1.17
~ 2.88'
1.85
0.48
0.67
0.71
1.83
2.54
5.16
5.83
6.87
15.49
19.24
12.10
14.10
13.50
16.20
16.00
13.10
17.10
12.70
7.10
4.44
6.33
6.00
'3B
1.82
7.06
5.47
3.11
2.46
1.63
2.98
1.38
0.52
2.35
3.26
3.39
2.26
3.70
5.51
7.62
-
10.28
10.95
11.48
19.32
20.99
16.50
18.43
13.80
12.90
8.70
4.20
7.00
4.70
3.70
3.56
6.85
12.00
CONDITIONS
4A
1.06
0.92
0.81
0.14
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.10
0.13
0.15
' 0.19
0.11
0.10
0.24
0.31
0.24
0.27
1.12
3.20
i.n
7.0)
21.57
6.30
11.43
5.00
6.00
5.70
4.70
5.30
4.50
4.30
0.51
1.02
0.24
4B
3.38
1.33
0.62
0.28
1.62
0.14
0.50
0.10
0.24
0.38
" 0.73
0.85
0.51
1.23
1.18
2.31
2.55
4.23
3.95
4.80
9.65
14.54
10.20
11.89
6.50
5.30
4.30
2.10
1.00
1.40
1.70
0.68
1.73
1.90
' 54
-------
TABLE B-9. NITRATE AND NITRITE DAI A SAMPLhl)
DURIN_6 OPERATIONAL CONDITION 2.
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
o.i
0.1
0.1
2.6
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1A
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.2
4.7
o.i
0.3
0.5
1.8
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
1.9
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
IB
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
10.0
0.4
0.7
0.3
2.8
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
2A
0.5
0.1
0.4
1.0
0.4
0.6
0.3
2.1
1.8
1.9
2.5
2.1
3.6
2.5
2.6
1.9
2.4
1.5
2.5
2.9
0.5
1.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.3
0.9
0.3
1.5
1.3
0.9
0.3
0.1
0.1
.23
0.5
0.1
1.0
2.0
1.2
0.8
0.9
4.7
1.6
1.5
1.6
0.6
2.5
1.6
1.2
1.6
2.3
1.9
3.3
4.5
0.7
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.8
3.7
2.9
3.9
2.7
2.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
3A
0.4
0.1
0.5
1.5
0.9
0.9
0.8
2.3
0.4
1.7
2.4
1.8
3.4
2.6
2.4
3.2
4.0
3.6
4.1
6.0
2.0
0.5
1.1
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.2
0.4
1.1
2.0
1.2
1.2
2.8
.33
0.3
0.1
1.0
0.2
0.1
1.0
0.6
3.0
1.0
1.3
1.4
1.3
2.8
1.9
1.4
1.6
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.9
1.6
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.7
1.5
3.0
4.1
3.8
2.2
2.3
1.1
0.5
0.6
4A
0.2
,0.2
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.3
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.5
2.1
0.2
1.1
1.3
0.9
1.4
1.8
2.1
2.8
3.3
4.3
1.8
2.1
2.4
4.B.
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.8
.7
3.9
0.1
0.1
1.4
1.6
2.0
1.9
2.1
1.7
0.2
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.1
1.8
1.8
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.9
0.7
-------
TABLE 8*1-0-. ORGANIC NITROGEN DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date .Infl 1A IB 2A&T ~^A ~~~3B 4A 4B
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
5/9
5.97
0.43
5.04
7.00
4.99
0.60
_
21.38
4.92
3.40
' '9.04
8.95
5.19
5.78
4.49
-
5.77
4.05
6.65
11.03
2.26
10.20
3.95
12.40
9.40
4.10
10.20
15.20
10.30
5.80
20.17
5.51
12.49
4.75
8.69
6.60
6.10
3.68
-
19.87
3.95
2.46
'13.40
5.11
1.43
0.10
.-1.32
4.37
0.37
2.59
4.27
3.48
2.78
6.45
6.80
7.80
7.30
3.60
11.70
8.10
: 9.50
7.65
10.80
12.73
13.07
2.82
7.74
8.21
2.75
4.68
0.45
17.98
6.33
2.82
'.- 3.67~
6.81
2.23
1.00
1.58
15.20
9.81
2.94
2.86
2.85
1.84
7.31
4.53
9.40
6.10
3.00
12.90
11.00
8.40
10.62
9.71
9.39
6.72
5.87
4.87
4.90
3.02
2.51
1.10
8.20
4.99
3.59
-3.32 .
5.79
3.82
3.45
2.48
6.17
9.81
1.95
2.63
0.77
2.07 '
2.41
3.47
8.20
7.40
6.80
14.60
5.30
6.90
9.31
5.97
8.96
6.88
9.03
6.07
5.30
3.42
2.70
-
8.85
4.95
2.57
": 4.40
5.86
2.77
1. 00
2.49
0.85
1.34
2.03
3.26
. 0.44
2.22
4.92
4.15
6.30
8.60
6.70
16.90
7.70
6.50
8.67
14.12
6.73
4.86
6.63
1.82
3.76
3.47
2.69
- .
3.98
5.93
3.02
4.02"
6.78
5.43
4.19
3.32
8.16
1.34
3.07
3.80
4.01
2.07
4.16
7.20
5.60
4.50
2.30
7.20
3.10
5.40
9.22
5.06
7.64
5.93
5.60
5.39
5.73
4.38
6.39
0.56
5.29
7.41
5.04
~W5.32~
7.94
5.40
2.99
3.31
-
2.32
2.50
3.70
1.51
5.34
5.01
2.87
4.80
5.10
6.10
9.60
3.60
3.20
4.30
3.15
3.41
5.48
5.18
4.90
5.12
4.83
4.73
0.78
3.88
4.62
5.51
-5.65-
6.15
4.52
3.72
3.46
3.24
2.0&
1.37
4.94
3.97
5.44.-
2.73
6.57
4.80
6.10
3.50
6.30
4.80
3.90
4.34
4.73
6.75
6.65
6.12
6.65
7.33
8.00
6.16
-
5.60
7.27
6.27
5.99
5.49
4.17
4.49
4.19
4.70
2.37
4.71
4.99
4.35
11.46
3.02
3,76
6.10
7.00
6.70
9.70
8.60
6.50
5.34
4.73
5.64
56
-------
TABLE B-ll. KJELDAHL NITROGEN DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL:CONDITIONS.
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25 -
11/1
11/8
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
23.1
17.6
19.8
20.6
17.7
23.7
18.5
21.4
20.5
43.3
- 21.2
24.5
25.1
19.3
12.3
24.3. :
24.3
27.1
31.4
11.3'
28.2,
24.2
139.3
29.2
24.3.
25.2
34.1
27.4
14.6
51.2
26.3
21.5
1A
23.1
21.6
18.7
15.6
18.7
18.5
0.9
19.9
19.7
18.7
-18.51
17.0
18.0
19.6
,. 24.7
24.5
23.5
29.0
29.3
9.5
29.9
30.9
32.9
31.7
28.7
30.9
29.2
29.2
27.9
25.8
31.3
25.7
IB
21.3
17.6
18.0
20.5
11.1
0.9
0.4
18.2
20.2
19.0
19.5
20.2
20.9
21.3
39.1
24.2
25.2
28.8
29.2
19.0
31.7
29.2
33.3
33.9
30.2
32.9
32.1
31.5
30.7
25.6
29.8
23.4
2A
7.6
16.7
14.0
8.4
12.4
0.4
0.9
8.2
12.2.
11.3
10.6 -
10.3
8.8
11.6.
17.2
16.1
16.1
20.1
27.8
17.3
20.0
26.9
27.7'
23.6
25.0
28.1
19.6
19.3.
19.3
15.8
21.3
: 22.0
2B
11.1
19.5
14.9
13.3
6.1
0.9
0.9
8.8
12.4
12.3
-13.4
14.2
13.9
16.7
16.5
17.7
17.7
21.9
26.9
25.7
24.9
26,5
25,0
26.7
19.4
26.6
16.0
14.2
13.0
37.6
27.0
23.2
3A
5.5
11.3
7.3
4.5
7.3
0.9
0.9
3.0
7.1
6.5
- 5;9-
7.2
4.9
5.1
10.7
8,9
8.9
10.7
19.5
21.3
16.3
21.3
19.1
20.7
18.3
20.3
20.2
18.1
16.3
9.4
11.4
13.6
3B
7.7
12.7
10.9
8.8
4.7
0.9
0.5
5.3
9.8
8.3
-8.7
10.2
8.5
10.7
1.0
13.4
13.4
15.2
20.9
26.3
21.4
21 ,3
18,6
18.0
14.8
13.8
10,6
7.9
8.0
6.5
10.0
:T5.4
4A
6.5
6.1
5.7
5.3
9.0
0.8
0.8
3.9
4.8
5.7
- 5.8-
6.2
4.0
3.7
3,5
4.5
4.6
6.0
10.0
27.0
9.1
18.0
10.3
12.1
9.2
11,0
10.0
8.4
8.6
5.7
5.7
6.0
4B
10.0
7.4
7.3
7.6
7.9
0.9
0.9
5.6
7.6
7.0
-6.9
6.0
5.7
6.5
7.2
8.7
8.7
9.8
14.0
26.0
13,2
15.6
12.6
12.3
11.0
11.8
9.6
7.9
7.0
5.3
6.1
.7.5
.57..:.:
-------
i nuL.u o it-* i v i 01* iii i-rvwuun un in- 'wrv ti-m*ซ
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2 .
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
23.20
17.59
20.01
20.70
23.12
23.81
18.30
-
21.38
20.53
43.40
23.80
24.70
30.85
45.10
19.66
12.40
33.10
24.30
27.06
31.96
12.52
28.30
24.30
30.60
29.50
24.40
25.30
43.20
27.50
15.82
51/30
26.38
21.61
1A
23.20
21.57
19.13
15.75
17.71
19.63
17.28
'
19.97
20.05
19.20
20.33
17.80
17.20
18.10
19.60
24.70
23.80
24.50
29.04
29.94
11.45
29.95
31.00
- 33.00
31,80
28.80
31.00
29.30
29.30
28.05
25.80
31.39
25.83
. IB
21.38
17.69
19.39
20.79
18.90
19.88
18.18
-
18.46
20.90
19.30
22.33
20.60
20.66
21.10
21.28
39.10
24.30
25.20
28.92
29.53
20.88
31.81
29.20
33.30
34.00
30.30
33.00
32.30
31.60
31.02
25.60
29.90
23.49
2A
8.10
16.78
14.40
9.40
11.47
11.33
11.38
-
10.00
14.11
"13.80 '
12.67
13.90
10.94
11.43
13.55
19.60
25.80
18.60
23.03
28.28
18.72
20.01
26.20
27. 70
25.90
25.90
28.40 :,
21.10'
20.70
20.21
16.10
21.38
23.06
2B
11.59
19.61
15.89
15.32
13.62
10.83
11.07
11.10
10.45
13.93
'13.90
14.00
16.70
14.81
15.15
18.29
18.80
21.30
21.00
26.39
27.58.
26.05
24.92
26.50
25.40
27.50
24.10
29.50
19.90
16.90
16.07
37.70
28.09
23.33
3A
5.87
11.42
7.78
5.98
6.95
4.79
4.98
-
4.39
8.80
8.90
7.68
10.60
8.70
7.30
8.34
14.70
10.10
13.00
16.76
21.49
21.81
17.36
22.30
19.60
21.20
19.30
20.50
20.60
19.20
18.32
10.60
12.59
16.44
3B
.8.05
12.76
11.86
9.04
8.16
7.01
; 9.97
-
6.29
11.06
~ 9.70*
10.02
13.00
11.00
9.90
12.36
2.22
15.90
15.85
19.08
22.43
26.53
21.91
21.70
19.30
19.50
17.80
17.90
14.40
10.10
10.30
7.50
10.50
16.01
4A
6.74
6.30
6.11
5.66
4.77
5.35
4.95.
-
3.88
4.77
6.40
5.97
6.40
5.76
4.13
6.00
5.51
5.40
6.76
8.55
13.08
27.21
10.23
19.30
11.20
23.00
11.00
13.10
12.90
11.70
12.94
7.50
7.85
9.39
4B
10.03
7.55
7.68
7.71
9.96
8.64
.6.86
-
6.61
8.15
7.80
7.56
9.90
12.60
6.67
7.90
8.85
8.60
10.56
11.89
15.70
26.20
14.02
16.55
13.50
13.60
12.10
13.60
11.40
9.00
8.14
6.00
19.00
8.24
58
-------
TABLE B-13. TOTAL PHOSPHORUS DATA SAMPLED
DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18 "
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
9.0
8.7
5.9
7.8
5.7
4.1
4.2
5.9
3.2
2.1
"12.2
3.3
1.3
6.3
3.9
7.0
11.3
17.5
13.3
14.1
9.8
7.8
9.2
12.0
15.0
17.0
13.0
13.0
17.5
11.5
5.5
27.0
13.0
13.0
1A
10.7
6.3
9.6
33.5
18.5
8.5
7.1
6.5
5.7
3.2
4.5
3.2
3.1
0.1
5.8
5.8
8.3
13.0
14.7
17.0
12.8
12.0
13.5
14.0
16.5
16.0
20.0
15.0
14.0
13.5
13.0
13.0
13.5
9.9
IB
8.9
10.6
10.4
13.0
15.2
9.0
7.5
6.6
5.2
. 3.2
3.8"
3.6
4.0
6.0
9.0
6.3
. 8.4
12.7
14.7
17.0
13.1
-
16.0
14.5
18.0
16.5
16.5
16.5
15.5
15.0
14.5
14.5
15.0
12.0
2A
3.7
11.7
9.6
6.9
9.0
8.9
8.6
6.9
6.3
4.2
~~4.2
3.5
2.3
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.3
10.0
16.0
13.2
12.8
11.8
9.4
14.0
15.0
13.5
13.5
15.0
11.0
12.0
12.0
14.0
15.0
13.0
2B
3.5
9.8
9.8
12.0
9.7
8.8
8.4
7.6
6.6
4.1
""" 4.3 "
3.8
2.9
4.9
5.4
5.8
6.7
9.5
12.9
13.6
13.6
14.3
13.0
14.5
15.0
14.0
13.5
14.5
12.0
13.0
12.5
20.0
17.5
14.5
3A
5.7
4.6
7.0
3.5
4.5
4.5
7.6
7.6
4.4
4.0
"6.5"
4.8
3.2
4.2
3.9
3.3
.
3.3
4.2
5.8
8.9
9.7
7.9
9.3
9.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
12.0
12.0
9.7
11.0
13.0
11.5
3B
3.7
7.1
7.0
8.5
6.4
4.4
6.4
5.2
3.2
3.3
... 3^.g ...
3.9
2.5
3.8
3.0
3.7
3.3
4.9
4.7
6.1
9.8
10.6
9.0
12.0
12.5
9.8
9.8
10.0
9.5
12.5
12.0
12.5
15.0
14.0
4A
3.1
1.0
3.1
8.4
1.5
1.3
1.7
2.0
1.8
1.0
2.3
2.3
1.2
1.8
2.0
3.6
3.4
3.6
4.2
4.8
6.2
6.3
4.8
7.8
7.1
7.1
7.6
8.4
8.7
8.7
8.4
11.0
9.6
7.3
4B
1.6
3.3
2.5
1.3
2.8
2.1
2.7
2.9
1.9
1.8
2.5
2.5
1.5
2.9
3.4
3.6
-
3.3
3.8
4.3
6.2
5.5
6.0
6.7
6.8
6.3
6.5
6.5
6.1
6.9
8.1
6.8
8.2
5.2
59
-------
TABLE B-14,. ORTHO PHOSPHATE .DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/T6
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18 -
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
7.97
4.62
5.50
5.10
4.35
1.50
3.35
2.54
1.31
1.40
-9.97
3.07
0.98
3.93
2.85
-
10.19
21.17
13.14
14.07
8.14
6.05
8.25
8,15
12.50
14.00
9.95
8.90
12.50
7.80
3.40
18.00
10.50
10.50
1A
8.96
7.97
8.36
9.35
10.05.
4.75
6.60
4.52
4.96
2.65
4.21
2.80
2.92
4.81
5.25
5.47
6.69
8.72
14.53
17.34
. 9.49
9.43
11.50
9.65
12.00
13.50
12.50
12.00
9.85
9.50
7.90
9.80
10.50
8.40
IB
6.76
J8.69
9.02
22.00
9.15
4.95
6.35
4.52
4.39
/ 2.38
3.44"
3.39
3.57
5.79
6.80
6.20
7.50
8.72
14.53
16.87
10.59
8.86
13.00
11.50
14.50
13.00
14.00
12.00
10.50
11.00
9.60
11.00
11.00
8.40
2A
2.64
.8.19
8.80
7.00
8.10
5.30
7.95
5.68
6.06
3.79
"3.85"
3.17
1.94
2.85
2.69
2.89
4.30
7.18
5.86
13.14
11.41
9.43
8.20
9.55
9.95
11.00
10.10
11.00
8.25
8.10
8.10
18.50
12.50
10.30
2B
2.31
8.52
8.19
8.50
8.55
4.15
7.95
6.52
6.71
3,. 61
"3.90"
3.59
2.34
4.30
5.84
5.79
6.67
7.06
7.85
12.67
10.86
9.71
9.70
9.95
10.10
11.50
9.95
9.75
8.95
8.80
8.50
15.50
9.75
11.00
3A
4.29
2.47
4.95
3.50
' 4.05
2.55
6.65
6.40
3.73
3.72
"4.88
4.26
2.82
3.43
3.03
2.45
2.74
4.10
5.76
7.33
7.45
6.75
7.10
8.30
8.90
9.80
10.10
8.90
8.30
7.40
10.00
7.95
12.00
36 .;...-,
2.91
6.71
6.65
3.80
5.55
2.10
5.70
4.20
2.34
2.96 ,
3.67
3.69
2.14
3.24
3.12
3.16
2.49
4.76
4.64
6.10
8.14
8.30
7.75
6.80
8.65
9.30
8.20
8.15
7.80
8.80
8.70
10.20
8.10
9.30
^:;4A; '"
2.20
2.03
1.76
1.10
0.92
0.54
1.25
1.09
0.85
1.37
2.68
1.82
0.38
0.97
1.34
2.94
3.44
4.20
4.20
4.69
5.38
5.33
4.45
6.80
5.91
6.80
6.90
7.20
7.00
6.80
6.50
10.10
8.10
6.40
4B -
0.51
1.32
0.86
0.63
2.05
0,98
1.10
1.58
0.88
1.31
2.30
2.03
1.38
2.24
2.48
2.89
_
3.58
3.58
4.32
4.95
4.74
5.10
5.40
5.41
5.40
5.60
4.95
4.60
5.50
4.90
5.75
6.75
4.50
60
-------
TABLE B-15. TOTAL ALKALINITY DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18 ~
10/25
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
V17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
Infl
206
189
190
218
194
194
210
203
181
175
291 '
204
510
200
184
208
227
192
198
217
188 ,
179
207
208
200 !
213
193 '
220
168
153 :
.289
232
1A
106
219
199
185
208
194
198
203
194
172.
~ 184-
180
192
194
. 132
201
196
119.'
212
207
194
191
202
212
207
228
219
198
186
214
203
229
IB
148
214
204
210
196
207
207
200
191
166
'172" ~
195
203
214
134
204
198
125
210
201
184
193
202
199
220
240
234
218
203
214
206
224
2A
136
203
203
152
177
178
189
180
158
148
' 144"
133
133
136
100
149
153
56
172
212
199
151
193
186
164
190
196
138
141
161
171
222
2B
148
209
200
185
168
176
183
183
171
157
"158' "
159
160
176
95
171
162
70
170
210
212
171
191
175
182
158
170
126
116
133
152
201
3A
172
181
189
146
150
154
171
169
161
139
~ 138 ~
133
133
136
95
111
111
81
126
176
178
137
169
157
162
171
176
136
138
141
132
121
3B
166
206
180
158
159
151
162
155
155
145
--,44- -
146
142
151
88
142
130
77
132
184
194
160
176
144
131
122
103
109
114
119
144
146
4A
169
172
183
170
165
151
159
151
171
148
144"
143
124
151
120
129
124
114
132
157
161
107
157
136
137
130
122
114
106
no
109
132
4B
99
154
150
120
153
156
156
158
168
151
-144
146
136
147
108
124
10
96
130
159
151
143
149
131
129
122
101
106
91
113
130
124
-------
:TABLE B-ie. "p" ALKALINITY DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-Z
Date
8/2
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11 .
10/18- - -
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
1
0
-0 -
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o :
0
0
0 ;
9
0
0
0
0
0
1A
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
o '-
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IB
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
o-.-~
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
2A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
- o -
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
o ;
0
0
0
0
0
0
- .
2B
1
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
1
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3A
0
0
0
5
7
11
0
0
4
18
- _ 0 _
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3B
0.1
0
0
4
2
20
2.
1
20
n
-7 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4A
1
0
0
47
38
58
38
1
58
2.,
22
22
2
33
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
4B
1
7
9
58
9
25
20
3
3
1
~ 33
9
16
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
62
-------
TABLE B-17. pH DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
5/24
6/28
7/5
7/26
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
7.5
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.4
7.4
- 7.2
7.2
7.1
7.2
7.1
' 7:1
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.0
6.9
7.0
6.9
6.9 :
6.7
6.8 :
6.7 i
6.5 '
6.9
6.6
6.5 ;
5.8
6.9
6.2
6.9
7.0
1A
7.9
7.1
7.6
8.7
7.1
7.2
7.8
7.4
8.6
8.0
- 7.9
7.5
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.3
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.2
6.8
7.1
6.9
7.0
7.0
6.9
- 6.7
6.7
6.9
6.7
6.8
7.0
7.7
6.9
6.9
7.3
IB
7.7
7.1
7.6
8.1
7.9
7.2
7.7
7.9
7.9
8.1
8:0
7.6
7.9
7.5
7.5
7.2
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.0
7.1
6.9
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.5
6.6
6.9
6.9
6.8
7.0
8.0
6.9
6.8
7.1
2A
7.5
7.1
7.7
8.2
7.4
7.3
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.0
-8.5--
8.0
8.1
7.4
7.5
10.0
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.3
6.6
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.0
.7.0
6.7
6.9
7.3
6.8
6.6
6.9
7.6
6.9
6.9
7.2
2B
7.6
7.2
7.6
7.9
7.2
7.4
7.9
8.3
8.6
8.0
-8.0
7.9
8.2
7.7
7.7
7.4
7.7
7.5
7.5
7.3
6.8
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.0
7.1
6.7
7.2
7.1
6.7
6.7
6.8
7.6
6.6
7.0
7.3
3A
7.7
7.2
7.9
8.4
7.4
7.4
8.4
8.7
8.9
8.2
-8.5"
8.9
8.7
7.5
7.8
7.8
7.4
7.5
7.4
7.5
6.7
6.9
7.0
7.3
7.0
7.1
6.7
6.9
7.1
6.9
6.7
6.8
7.8
6.9
7.0
7.0
38
8.1
7.3
7.9
8.2
7.2
7.4
8.4
8.5
9.1
8.6
-g-.O ~
9.1
8.8
7.9
8.3
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.6
7.7
6.9
-
7.1
4.2
7.0
7.2
6.7
7.2
8.1
6.9
6.6
6.8
7.4
7.0
7.1
7.3
4A
7.7
7.2
7.4
-
7.6
7.7
9.2
9.5
9.8
9.7
' "9.5
9.6
9.3
8.8
9.6
9.3
9.1
7.9
8.1
8.3
7.2
7.1
7.0
7.9
7.2
7.0
6.8
7.0
7.4
6.8
6.7
6.7
8.0
7.0
7.1
7.3
4B
8.1
7.9
9.4
9.6
8.6
8.8
9.5
8.8
9.5
9.2
- 9". 6
9.6
9.2
8.5
9.1
8.6
8.1
8.0
7.8
6.9
6.8
7.0
7.1
7.4
6.8
7.1
6.9
7.1
7.5
6.7
6.6
6.8
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.4
.63.
-------
TABLE B-18. DISSOLVED OXYGEN DATA SAMPLED DURING .OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18 -
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
Infl
2.9
1.8
26.5
1.4
1.2
1.0
21.5
0.6
2.9
2.5
~ 2.2-
3.5
2.1
1.7
1.3 .
1.5
1.9
1.9
0.3
2.7
0.6
0.0
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.1 !
0.8 :
0.3 ;
i
0.3
0.3 :
0.0
0.1
0.6 ;
1A
3.1
6.5
16.4
8.1
2.0
12.0
28.5
6.4
5.8
11.2
9.9
8.1
12.4
9.4
3.0
4.1
4.6
4.5
5.2
7.0
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.1
0.3
2.2
14.5
1.5
6.2
0.2
0.2
7.8
IB
4.9
6.0
16.0
12.2
11.4
8.5
13.8
11.0
8.4
14.6
--7.4
6.7
11.4
5.8
2.5
4.2
6.6
-
4.8
2.0
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
7.2
2.2
9.1
0.2
0.2
0.8
2A
7.2
8.4
5.0
7.2
8.3
10.2
7.6
17.4
9.0
14.6
B.3T
7.3
10.8
10.8
6.3
8.8
9.7
5.0
5.4
9.5
1.0
1.7
1.0
10.0
1.5
12.2
8.7
13.5
7.2
6.7
7.2
1.2
2.3
1.6
2B
5.0
10.5
15.0
7.7
12.0
17.0
10.2
8.2
8.5
14.0
9 '.5
8.2
13.0
9.6
6.2
8.1
10.6
6.4
6.0
9.8
1.2
1.7
3.9
1.3
5.3
14.7
6.3
12.4
9.0
6.9
7.6
1.3
1.7
2.6
3A
6.2
14.2
14.2
6.1
9.0
9.8
8.0
6.8
11.8
14.2
"9.3"
9.2
14.8
12.0
7.8
10.8
12.6
9.8
7.1
15.0
11.0
9.5
12.5
9.9
11.2
4.3
9.2
1.9
5.9
7.4
8.4
3.2
7.2
5.8
3B
6.6
10.2
13.4
9.4
9.6
19.2
12.0
15.2
10.6
17.0
"12.2 "
10.8
16.4
12.8
8.4
10.5
12.8
11.6
7.3
15.9
7.0
4.2
8.5
8.2
11.9
11.5
12.0
15.7
9.3
4.9
7.2
3.8
6.7
.-
4A
25.0
12.6
18.0
8.2
10.2
17.4
14,4-
11.8
10.4
15.4
10.6
11.2
17.0
13.6
9.0
11.4
13.2
13.2
9.8
17.0
15.2
18.4
19.5
18.2
11.3
13.3
8.8
6.9
7.8
5.0
9.2
4.7
7.7
5.3
4B
25.0
17.2
19.0
9.0
4.5
17.6
12.2
18.4
10.6
14.8
"11.2
11.0
14.0
12.6
9.5
11.8
13.9
11.8
9.9
16.5
12.0
9.3
11.6
10.2
10.5
12.1
9.7
16.0
9.9
6.7
6.5
10.1
8.0
7.0
64
-------
TABLE B-19. TEMPERATURE DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDITION-2
Date
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27 -
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
25.5
26.0
26.5
27.0
26.0
27.5
27.5
25.5
24.0
24.0
- 22.0-
21.5
20.5
17.5
17.0 .
15.5
14.5
14.0
14.0
13.5
11.5
12.0
10.5
12.0
12.0,
14.0
15.0
-
13. o:
16.0
17.0
19.5
19.0
25.0
26.5
29.0
28.0
26.0
29.5
28.5
24.0
21.0
23.0
' 17.0
17.5
14.5
9.0
.
5.0
-
9.0
3.0
-
2.5
2.7
. 10.5
9.0
10.0
12.5
13.5
10.4
9.5
16.0
18.5
21.0
20.5
25.0
26.5
29.0
27.5
26.0
29.0
28.5
24.5
21.0
23.0
17.5"
17.5
15.0
9.0
9.0
5.0
-
9.0
3.0
3.5
3.0
2.8
2.5
9.0
10.0
12.5
13.5
14.5
9.5
16.0
18.5
21.0
20.5
26.
27.
29.
28.
26.
31.
28.
25.
20.
22.
16.
17.
13.
8.
'
3.
4.
9.
1.
1.
1.
1.
3.
8.
10.
12.
13.
14.
9.
16.
19.
21.
21.
0
5
0
0
5
5
0
5
0
0
Q-
5
5
0
5
5
0
0
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
25.5
28.0
29.0
27.5
26.0
31.0
28.0
25.0
20.0
22.0
16.0-
17.5
13.5
8.0
8.0
3.5
4.0
9.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.3
-
8.0
10.0
12.0
13.5
14.5
9.0
16.0
19.0
1.0
21.0
26
28
29
28
26
30
27
25
21
22
.... lg
17
13
8
8
4
4
8
1
1
1
1
10
7
10
12
13
14
9
16
19
21
21
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.5
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0"
.5
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
25.5
28.0
28.5
27.5
26.0
21.0
27.5
26.0
20.5
22.0
16.0 -
18.0
13.5
8.0
8.0
3.5
3.5
8.0
-
1.0
-
1.0
10.0
-
10.0
12.0
13.5
14.0
9.0
16.0
19.0
6.7
-
25.0
28.5
28.5
28.0
25.5
29.5
27.0
24.5
20.5
22.0
16.0
17.5
14.0
9.0
8.0
5.0
4.0
9.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
10.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
9.0
16.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
25.0
29.0
28.5
28.0
25.0
29.0
27.0
25.0
20.0
22.0
15.5
18.5
13.5
8.0
8.0
5.0
3.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
10.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
9.0
16.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
65
-------
TABLE B-20. FECAL COLIFORM DATA SAMPLED DURING OPERATIONAL CONDIT.ION-2
Date . :
8/2/78
8/9
8/16
8/23
8/30
9/6
9/13
9/27
10/4
10/11
10/18
10/25
11/1
11/8
11/15
11/29
12/6
12/13
12/20
1/3/79
1/10
1/17
1/24
1/31
2/28
3/7
3/14
3/21
3/28
4/4
4/11
4/18
4/25
5/9
0.11
0.20
-
5.20
7.50
5.90
5.90
2.70
5.40
- 2.40
0.70
1.00
5.00
2.20
1.50
2.10
3.50
3.90
7.00
3.80
6.80
4.80
0.80
5.00
9.00
85.00
8.40
3.20
-
9.20
5.60
16.00
-
-
70.00
17.00
- .
2.70
2.80
0.40
1.10
0.40
8.70
7; 00
0.30
1.00
1.20
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.20
0.17
0.07
; 2.50
10.00
150.00
10.00
.20.00
;20.oo
10.00
20.00
10.00
: 6.00
5.00
19.00
-
-
3.00
23.00
-
2.00
2.20
6.50
0.30
0.42
6.80
:8.40
1.00
0.60
3.10
2.20
1.40
2.10
4.20
1.20
0.30
0.90
12.00
160.00
46.00
16.00
16.00
5.00
16.00
9.00
-
1.00
0.50
4.00
-
-
0.10
0.25
-
0.45
0.57
0.21
0.20
0.12
8.50
- 5.40
1.20
0.20
0.80
.0.60
0.30
0.40
1.70
0.10
0.01
2.60
15.00
700.00
10.00
90.00
2.00
0.70
3.30
5.60
-
11.00
4.20
11.00
-
-
0.
1.
-
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
10.
0.
0.
1.
4.
1.
1.
3.
0.
0.
1.
12.
870.
10.
37.
3.
. 1.
3.
0.
; -
0.
.0.
0.
-
-
30
20
87
88
15
12
06
40
00 ~
90
60
90
20
40
90
80
90
02
80
00
00
00
00
00
20
90
70
10
25
24
0.10
0.20
- .
0.14
0.14
0.10
0.16
0.46
0.51
- 2:80~
0.40
0.20
0.90
1.10
0.20
0.30
3.00
0.10
0.01
2.80
10.00
3.20
0.60
23.00
1.60
1.00
0.60
1.00
-
10.00
3.50
1.90
-
-
0.10
0,10
-.
0.30
0.20
0.23
0.16
0.00
2.00
-6.60
0.60
0.30
0.70
2.30
0.10
1.30
1.00
0.80
0.02
1.80
12.00
9.90
1.60
46.00
1.00
0.60
1.90
-
-
0.10
0.14
0.21
-
-
1
0
0
1
0
0
.80
.40
-
.20
.10
.20
.10
0.76
0
__ 2
1
15
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
11
20
0
0
55
0
0
0
5
5
31
.20
;70
.40
.00
.10
.10
.20
.20
.00
.10
.04
.00
.00
.30
.10
.00
.70
.10
.50
-
-
.40
.80
.00
-
-
0.70
1.30
-
0.30
0.80
1.20
1.10
0.74
1.30
"15.00
1.00
1.40
0.10
1.30
1.20
1.80
30.00
0.10
1.00
7.00
44.00
7.00
0.20
22.00
0.20
0.30
2.30
1.40
-
0.10
0.14
47.00
-
-
.:..66 :
-------
APPENDIX C
TABLE C-l. STATISTICAL TABULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY PARAMETER,
BOD5 SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! AND -2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
BOD5
Run Condition .1 .
BOD5
Run Condition 2
1
sd
_.N;_
t
.a
sd
N
t
Cell 1
4.52
7.11
._ 24.00 .._ .
3.11
-4.35
20.70
33.00
. -1.21
Cell 2
5.50
14.90
_25.00.~
1.85
0.19
13.30
32.00
0.08
Cell 3
3.20
14.10
. .-23.00. .. .
1.09
2.02
16.90
32.00
0.68
Cell 4
1.53
9.58
. 22.00...
0.75
-3.44
9.05
33.00
-2.18
TABLE C-2. STATISTICAL TABULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY PARAMETER,
SUSPENDED SOLIDS, SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! AND -2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
Suspended Solids
Run Condition 1
a
sd
N
t
d
sd
N
t
Cell T
0.75
7.81
24.00
0.47
-0.22
16.60
32.00
-0.07
Cell 2
4.80
19.60
25.00
1.22
-1.48
15.90
33.00
-0.53
Cell 3
7.50
20.00
24.00
1.84
-7.94
16.30
34.00
-2.84
Cell 4
10.90
23.40
25.00
2.33
-28.20
25.20
34.00
6.53
67
-------
. TABLE C-3. STATISTICAL TABULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENT PARAMETER
AMMONIA. SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! AND -2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
NH3
Cond. 1
NH3 -
Cond. 2
3
sd
N
t
3
_cH
- avi '
N
t
Cell 1
-0.30
2.17
26.00
-0.03
-1.07
2.57
34.00
-2.43
Cell 2
-3.17
3.69
26.00
-4.38
-1.15
3.-39
34.00
-1,98 .
Cell 3
-2.29
1.99
25.00
-5.75
0.73
_ 4,! 8-
33.00
-1,00
Cell 4
-1.71
1.86
26.00
-4.69
0.29
- 2.22 -
34.00
-0.76
TABLE C-4. STATISTICAL TABULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENT PARAMETER
NITRATES-NITRITES. SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! AND -2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
N03 +
Cond.
N03 +
N02
1
NOo
Condition 2
3
sd
N
t
a
sd
: N
t
Cell 1
-0.07
0.51
26.00
-0.70
-0.01
0.28
33.00
-0.21
Cell 2
0.83
1.12
26.00
3.78
-0.29
1.16
34.00
-1.46
Cell 3
1.61
3.43
26.00
2.39
0.16
1.34
34.00
0.70
Cell 4
1.39
2.84
26.00
2.50
0.22
1.06
34.00
1.21
68
-------
TABLE C-5. STATISTICAL TABULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENT PARAMETER
ORGANIC NITROGEN, SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-1 AND -2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
Organic N
Cond. 1
Org...N_
Cond. 2
_
a
sd
N
t
3
. ... -sd..
N
t
Cell 1
-0.29
1.84
26.00
-0.80
-0.16
- _-_3,.14_ --.- -
32.00
-0.29
Cell 2
0.64
0.88
25.00
3.64
-0.77
_ 4.72- __
33.00
-0.94
Cell 3
0.53
2.99
24.00
0.87
-0.12
._ 2.27-
32.00
-0.30
Cell 4
-0.11
1.94
26.00
0.29
-0.31
- -1.77 -
33.00
-4.25
TABLE C-6. STATISTICAL TABULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENT PARAMETER
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS. SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! AND -2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
! Cell 1
Total
Cond.
Total
Cond.
Phosphorus
1
P
2
S
sd
N
t
a
sd
N
t
-0
0
23
-0
0
3
33
0
.09
.87
.00
.50
.16
.96
.00
.23
Cell 2
-0.
0.
23.
-1.
-0
1.
34.
-2.
29
88
00
58
.90
78
00
95
Cell 3
-6
0
23
-1
-0
1
33
-0
.26
.72
.00
.73
.20
.85
.00
.62
Cell 4
0
1
23
0
0
1
33
1
.19
.87
.00
.50
.59
.71
.00
.98
.69
-------
- TABLE C-7. STATISTICAL TABULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENT PARAMETER,
ORTHO-PHOSPHATES. SAMPLED DURING CONDITION-! AND-2 EXPERIMENTAL PHftSES
. Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4
3 -0.20 -0.72 -0.23 0.40
Ortho Phosphates sd 0.75 1.98 1.39 1.90
Cond. 1 N 25.00 25.00 24.00 24.00
t -1.33 -1.82 -0.81 1.03
3 ... -0.88 -0.44 -0.08 : 0.58
Ortho P sd 2.46 1.14 " " 1.38 1.17
Cond. 2 t ... . -2.09 -2.25 -0.33 2.85
-------
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-l. DIURNAL OXYGEN
COLLECTED
AND TEMPERATURE DATA ON AQUACULTURE RACEWAYS,
ON JUNE 29, and JUNE 30, 1977
Sampl e
Location
1A
IB
2A.. .,
2B
3A
3B
4A ;
4B.
1A
Depth
(m)
Surface
1
2
Surface
. : 1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
D. 0.
(ppm)
10.8
4.5
0.6
8.4
,3.9_
0.5
10.6
4.8
0.5
9.2
8.8
0.&
9.7
8.5
0.4
8.4
7.8
0.7
9.5
7.5
7.5
8.T
7.5
0.5
9.2
9.0
0.6
Temp ฐC
29.0
27.5
26.5
29.0
27.5 ._
26.0
29.0
27.5
27.0
29.0
28.0
26.5
29.0
28.0
26.5
29.0
28.5
26.5
29.0
28.0
28.0
29.0
29.0
27.0
28.0
28.0
26.5
Time
1820
2010
2025
2030
2040
2035
2045
2050
2210
(Continuted)
7T.
-------
TABLE D-l,
Sample
Location
IB
2A
2B
3A
3B
4A
4B
1A
IB
2A
2B
3A
3B
Depth
On)
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
: 2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
D. 0.
(ppm)
8.2
8.1
0.7-
9.8
10.0
0.5
8,7
8.8
0.5
10.6
10.6
0.4
8.4
"s.r
0.5
10.6
10.6
0.4
7.8
7.6
0.4
8.6
8.7
0.5
7.6
7.5
0.4
8.1
8.0
0.4
6.9
6.6
0.4
8.9
9.0
0.4
6.3
6.1
0.8
Temp ฐC
28.0
28.0
26.0
28.0
28.0
26.8
28.0
28.0
26.8
28.0
28.0
26.5
28.0
28.0
26.5
28.0
28.0
26.0
28.0
28.0
26.5
27.5
27.5
26.5
27.0
27.0
25.5
27.5
27.5
26.5
27. Q
27.0
26.0
27.0
27.0
36.0
27.5
27.5
26.5
Time
2205
2215
2220
2230
.2225
2235
2240
2410
2415
2425
2420
2430
2435
(Continued)
72
-------
....
Sample
Location
4A
4B
1A
IB
2A
2B
3A
3B
4A
4B
1A
IB
2A
Depth
(m)
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
~ r
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
' 1 ' '
: 2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
: 1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface -
1
2
TABLE D-T
D. 0.
(ppm)
9.1
9.2
. _0.5 _ .
5.9
5.6
0.4
6.2
6.1
4.1
8.7
5.4
0.7
5.4
5.4" ~
4.8
4.7
4.5
4.2
6.3
6.0
5.8
4.2
3.9
3.8
5.7
5.5
5.3
3.2
3.1
2.9
2.9
2.7
2.6
2.9
2.7
2.6
4.8
4.7
4.4
Temp ฐC
27.0
. 27.0
26.0
27.5
27.5
26.5
27.0
27.0
26.5
26.5
26.5
25.5
27.0
27.0
27.0
26.5
27.0
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Time
2445
2440
0215
0210
_0220._
0225
0235
0230
0240
0242
0410
0415
0425
(Continued)
.''' 73
-------
TABLE D-1,
Sample
Location
2B
3A
3B
4A
4B ._ _. ..
1A
IB
2A
2B
3A
38
4A
4B
Depth
On)
Surface
1
? .
b ~
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
_ Surface..,
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1 '
2
; Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
; 2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
D.O.
(ppm)
3.7
3.5
J A
,3 .
-------
TABLE D-l.
Sample
Location
1A
IB
2A
2B
3A ~.-
3B
4A
4B
1A
IB
2A
2B
3A
Depth
(m)
Surface
1
u
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
-- Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
: i
2
; Surface
1 .
2
Surface
1
; . 2
Surface
1
: 2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
D. 0.
(ppm)
3.2
2.4
. 0 "3
ฃ _ J
8.0
2.7
2.4
5.4
4.9
4.6
4.3
4.1
3.9
_. -.5.3 -
4.8
4.9
5.0
4.7
4.5
4.5
4.1.
4.0
4.3
4.0
3.8
7.0
6.7
6.3
7.2
6.9
6.8
8.1
7.8
7.8
7.3
7.1
6.9
8.0
7.9
7.7
Temp ฐC
25.5
25.5
9C C
ฃ0. 0 -
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.0
25.0
25.5
25.5
25.5
..,.25.5- _
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.5
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.8
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Time
0810
0812
0820
0815
.... -0825-
0830
0840
0835
1012
1017
1025
1020
1030
(Continued)
75::
-------
TABLE D-l
Sample
Location
38
4A
4B
1A
IB
2A
2B
3A
3B
4A
'.' 4B
1A
IB
Depth
(m)
Surface
1
_ .._.^ 2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1 -
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
: 2
Surface
1
; 2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
. 2 ..
D. 0. ....
(ppm)
7.9
7.8'
7,4
7.4
7.1
7.0
7.5
7.3
7.0
8.7
8.7:
6.3:
7.9
" 7.9 "
3.4
9.3
9.3
8.5
8.8
8.8
8.4
9.9
9.9:
9.5.
9.3!
9.3
8.1
9.4
9.3
9.1.
9.4;
9.4
7.4:
8.0'
6.3
0.3'
8.6
8.0
0.6
' ' f\ ''"'
Temp C
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
27.0
27.0
26.0
27.0
~ ~"27~;o" '
27.0
27,0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
27.5
27.5
26.5
29.0
27.0
26.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
Time
1035
1042
1037
1215
1210
1220
1225
1235
1230
1237
1245
1415
1420
(Continued)
i 76-'
-------
TABLE D-l
Sampl e
Location
-_ 2A
2B
3A
3B
4A~ "'"" "~
4B
1A
t
IB
2A ;
2B ;
3A
3B
Depth
(m)
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
'" Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
D.O.
(ppm)
10.2
9.8
5.8
9.1
7.9
2.6
10.8
10.2
3.9
10.2
8.1
3.1
" 1T.O" -
8.1
4.4
10.2
8.3
4.3
9.0
7.0
0.6
7.8
7.5
0.3
9.8
7.6
1.3
9.0
7.6
0.9
10.8
8.3
1.0
9.8
7.9
0.5
Temp ฐC
28.5
27.5
27.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
28.0
28.0
26.5
28.5
27.0
26.0
._. .... 2g;5
27.0
26.5
28.5
27.5
26.5
30.0
27.5
26.0
30.0
27.0
26.0
29.5
27.0
26.5
29.5
27.5
26.5
30.0
27.5
26.5
29.5
27.5
26.5
Time
1430
1425
1435
1440
._.. _145Q ...
1445
1630
1625
1635
1640
1650
1645
(Continued)
77;
-------
-
Sample
Location
4A
-
4B
1A
IB
. 2A _. .
2B
3A . .. .,
3B
4A ;
1
4B
,
1A
IB
Depth
(m)
Surface
1
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
._ Surface- .._ .
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface. . ...
1
2
Surface.
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
Surface
1
2
TABLE D-l.
D. 0.
.(ppm)
10.6
7.2
10.0
8.6
0.3
8.6
6.2
0.3
7.2
0.4
. ..9.3.. .
7.8
0.3
7.7
5.0
0.3
-,,9.4
7.3
0.9
8.3
7.1
0.3
9.8
6.3
0.3
9.2
8.9
0.5
8.6
3.8
0.3
7.2
5.2
0.3
Temp ฐC
30.0
27.0
29.5
27.5
26.5 .
29.5
27.5
26.0
29.0
28.0
26.0
29.0
"27^5 rr:~~
27.0
29.0
27.0
26.0
.29.0
27.5
. . . 26.0
1
' 29.0 .
27.5
26.0
29.0
27.0
26.5
29.0
27.5
26.5
28.5
26.5
26.0
28.0
27.0
25.5
Time
1700
1703
1820
1815
.-1825 ... _ .
1835
1845
1840 . .
1850
1900
2015
2018
(Continued)
,78
-------
TABLE D-l.
Sample Depth D. 0.
Location [mj (ppm) Temp C Time
2A Surface 9.4 28.0 2030
1 3.7 27.0
-. 2 : 0.4 26.5- -- -
2B Surface 8.4 28.0 2035
1 6.5 27.5
2 0.2 26.0
3A Surface 9.9 28.0 2045
1 7.1 27.0
2 0.3 26.5
3B Surface 8.8 28.0 2040
1 7.3 28.0
2 0.4 26.0
. 4A _ _'. ...Surface-. . -9.5 28.0. - 2055.
1 4.5 27.0
2 0.3 26.5
4B Surface 8.9 28.0 2100
1 7.2; 27.5
2 0.3 26.5
-------
APPENDIX E
TABLE E-1. STOCKING AND HARVESTING UNITS OF PIMPHALES PROMELAS RAF.
. UNDER CONDITIONS-! AND -2 EXPERIMENTAL PHASES
Location
Cell
IB
2B
3B
4B
IB
2B
3B
4B
IB
2B
3B
4B
Stocking
density
*(kg/.l hec.)
Summer- 197 7
: 38
38
38
...: . 38
Summer- 1978
_
! 151
151
. 151
Fall -1978
.
30
87
151
CONDITION-1
Standing crop
harvested
(kg/.l hec.)
' Spring- 1978 "
0
4
11
49
CONDITION-2
Spring-1978
^
30
87
151
Spring-1978
**4
100
104
% reduction % Increase
in numbers in numbers
100
90
70
30
_ _ _
80
43
-
-
88
15
31
*A11 biomass determinations based on measurements of fish by the
displacement of a volume of water (3.8 liters) by the same volume and
the biomass equal to the weight of the volume of water displaced:
3.8 liters = 3.78 kg (4 kg).
**Less than 30 individuals remained at the harvest sampling unit,
therefore a 4 kg unit was used for ease in computation.
so:-;
------- |