PB97-963124
EPA/541/R-97/068
November 1997
EPA Superfund
Record of Decision Amendment:
Arcanum Iron & Metal,
Darke County, OH
6/18/1997
-------
U.S. EPA SUPERFUND
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SUPERFUND SITE
ARCANUM, TWIN TOWNSHIP, DARKE COUNTY, OHIO
*
JUNE 1997
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT i
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT SUMMARY
I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION 1
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES 3
III. HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 4
IV. SCOPE OF SELECTED REMEDY 5
V. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS 6
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 8
VII. REASON FOR ROD AMENDMENT 9
VIII. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 12
IX. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 15
X. SELECTED REMEDY 19
XI. ARARs COMPLIANCE 25
XII. STATUTORY DETERMINATION 27
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
APPENDIX B - ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
DECLARATION
FOR THE
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SUPERFUND SITE
ARCANUM, TWIN TOWNSHIP, DARKE COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
.DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
SITE NAME AND LOCATION
Arcanum Iron and Metal ("AIM") Superfund Site, Village of Arcanum, Twin Township, Darke
County, Ohio.
STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE
This decision document represents the selected final remedial action for the AIM Superfund Site
in the Village of Arcanum, Twin Township, Darke County, Ohio. This action was chosen in
accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
of 1980 ("CERCLA"), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 ("SARA"), and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan ("NCP").
The decisions contained herein are based on information contained in the administrative record
for this site. The State of Ohio is expected to concur with the selected remedy.
ASSESSMENT OF THE REMEDY
Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the AIM Site, if not addressed by
implementing the response action selected in this Record of Decision ("ROD"), may present an
imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REMEDY
The selected remedial action calls for the following actions to be taken at the AIM Site:
(1) removal of approximately 4,000 cubic yards of lead acid battery casing chips ("battery casing
chips") found both in the buildings and in a separate stockpile on the AIM Site; (2) treatment of
the battery casing chips either on-site, or off-site at a U.S. EPA-approved Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act ("RCRA") Subtitle C treatment, storage, and disposal facility ("a permitted
TSDF"), to meet the land disposal restrictions ("LDRs"), followed by disposal in an approved
landfill; (3) demolition and removal of three buildings on the AIM Site in order to address the
foundations and remove contaminated soil and suspected battery casing chips down to six feet
below grade; (4) clearing the Site of all trees; (5) removal and disposal or recycling of demolition
debris, drums, flat-bed trailers, and an above-ground (500 gallon) tank; (6) removal of an
Underground Storage Tank ("UST") due to its location within the area of contamination;
(7) investigation of sediments in Sycamore Ditch and if contaminated with lead in excess of
applicable, standards, removal, dewatering and placement of sediments contaminated with lead at
levels less than 1550 milligrams per kilogram ("mg/kg") on the former operational area of the
AIM Site; (8) removal of contaminated soils to meet a revised cleanup level of 1550 mg/kg lead
in soil for soils within the former operational area of the Site (within the existing fence line), and
400 mg/kg lead in soil for soils outside the former operational area (outside the fence line);
AIM ROD Amendment
June 1997 i
-------
(9) disposal of soils outside the former operational area (outside the fence line) that are over 400
rag/kg lead but under 1550 mg/kg lead on the former operational area; (10) disposal of soils and
sediments contaminated with lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg that pass the toxicity characteristic
leaching procedure ("TCLP") test in an approved landfill; (11) treatment of soils and sediments
contaminated with lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg that fail the TCLP test, either on-site or off-site
at a permitted TSDF to meet the LDRs, followed by disposal in an approved landfill;
(12) placement of approximately 36,000 cubic yards of soil in the excavated areas; (13) capping
the clay drain tile that runs from the AIM Site to Sycamore Ditch at the AIM Site and connecting
to the existing Village of Arcanum storm water collection system, or reconnecting the drain with
existing drain tiles once remedial actions are complete; (14) maintaining and repairing the private
road (Pop .Rite Lane), if used, that contractor trucks must travel over for the transportation and
disposal of the battery casing chips, contaminated soils, demolition debris, as well as hauling
backfill to the Site; resurfacing the private road once the remedial design/remedial action
("RD/RA") phase is complete; (15) monitoring the groundwater, air and surface water at the Site
during the RD/RA phase; (16) recording deed restrictions for the Site; and (17) maintaining site
security throughout the RD/RA phases of this project
STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
This final remedial action is protective of human health and the environment, complies with
Federal and State applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements ("ARARs") and is cost-
effective. The selected remedial action utilizes permanent solutions and considered the use of
alternative treatment technologies to the maximum extent practicable. This remedy addresses the
statutory preference for treatment that reduces toxicity, mobility, or volume as a principal
element by treating the battery casing chips, as well as soils and sediments contaminated with
lead in excess of 1 550 mg/kg that fail the TCLP test, to meet LDRs and pass the TCLP test. Due
to the significant volume of waste at the Site, soils contaminated with lead in excess of 1550
mg/kg that pass the TCLP test will not be treated in order to remain on-site, but will be disposed
of at an approved landfill. A review will be conducted to ensure that the remedy continues to
provide adequate protection of human health and the environment within five years after
commencement of the remedial action.
_
'Date ' William E. rfuno
Director, Superfund Division
AIM ROD Amendment
June 1997 ii
-------
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT SUMMARY
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SUPERFUND SITE
VILLAGE OF ARCANUM, TWIN TOWNSHIP, DARKE COUNTY, OHIO
I. SITE NAME. LOCATION. AND DESCRIPTION
The Arcanum Iron and Metal Superfund ("AIM") Site is located in
west-central Ohio, approximately 25 miles northwest of Dayton,
Ohio, in Twin Township, Darke County, Ohio. The site occupies
about 4.5 acres, is fenced, and has little horizontal relief.
The 4.5 acre site contains a saw building, office building,
smelter building, used battery casing chips piles, septic tanks,
and gas, electric and water utilities. The AIM Site is just
outside the limits of the Village of Arcanum, Ohio. The AIM Site
is zoned for light industrial or commercial operations. The area
outside the fence is currently being farmed on two sides (west
and south); the north side of the property is bordered by Pop
Rite Lane and a light industrial operation is located on that
property; the east side of the property is bordered by the former
railroa'd right-of-way, now owned by Dayton Power and Light. There
is a Federal Lien on 18.341 acres of property owned by Mr. Harold
M. Shane, which includes the AIM Site property totaling 4.5
acres. The lien is dated August 31, 1989, and was sent to the
Darke County Recorder in Greenville, Ohio on September 19, 1989.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. EPA") Region 5 is
the lead agency for the AIM Site, and the State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency ("Ohio EPA") is the support
agency.
Approximately one acre of the site (in the central and eastern
portions of the site) is covered with immature trees; nearly all
with trunks less than 8 inches in diameter. On the north end of
the site lies the former AIM Site office and saw buildings. The
former office building is a 100 feet long by 30 feet wide one
story brick and masonry building with a wood roof. The saw
building is a roughly 120 feet long by 50 feet wide, irregular
shaped wood storage building with a three foot high concrete
skirt on the north and south side walls. Housed inside the saw
building are approximately 3,200 cubic yards of ebonite battery
casing chips. On the southern end of the site lie the lead
smelter and a pile of an estimated 800 cubic yards of battery
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 1
-------
casing chips. The battery casing chips are primarily ebonite; a
small percentage of unchipped battery casings are also present.
No lead acid batteries remain at the site. The smelter is a
collapsed one story wood structure approximately 40 feet long by
15 feet wide. Along the west side of the site runs a service
road to the smelter which appears to have been paved with battery
casing chips. In addition, there is a pile of approximately 300
cubic yards of lead-contaminated soils from a site in downtown
Arcanum ("AIM II") that were placed on the AIM Site during an
emergency removal action conducted by the owner of the AIM Site
in January and February of 1986.
The AIM Site ground surface is relatively level to gently sloping
with elevations of approximately 1,050 ft above mean sea level.
The surrounding land use is agricultural. However, to the
immediate north of the AIM Site, across Pop Rite Lane, there is
also a light commercial/industrial business. The soils
encountered at the AIM Site include fill materials and glacial
tills. The thickness of the soils range from approximately 20 to
33 feet.
There is one aquifer at the AIM Site, which has two zones, upper
and lower, from which water can be withdrawn. The upper zone
occurs in a permeable sand and gravel layer of limited extent
which overlies the bedrock. Wells in this aquifer zone are
reportedly not being used for domestic or municipal water
supplies in the immediate area of the AIM Site. The lower
aquifer zone occurs in the dolomitic limestone bedrock. Wells in
the lower aquifer zone are used for the City of Arcanum municipal
water supply and for many private wells one mile west of the AIM
Site. Ground water flow in this aquifer is northeasterly.
Due to rain water run-off, lead collects in low-lying areas
(surface depressions) of the AIM Site, which consists of clay-
type soils. Water from the AIM Site enters the Sycamore Ditch
through a storm sewer that discharges near the sduthwest corner
of the Arcanum Wastewater Treatment Plant lagoons. Sycamore
Ditch flows north from the storm sewer outfall, past the sewage
treatment lagoons, and empties into Painter Creek.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
The AIM Site operated as a lead battery reprocessing facility
from the early 1960's until 1982. The AIM facility accepted
automobile and industrial batteries for reprocessing. During
this operation, battery casings were split to extract the lead
cores. This operation generated plastic and black rubber casings
and battery acids. After the casings were split, the spent
battery acid was released to the ground. In addition, an on-site
lead smelter facility may have emitted lead-containing
particulates during operation.
The plastic battery casings were stockpiled and then reprocessed.
During reprocessing, lead oxide sludge was generated and then
piled for recycling behind the saw building. During dry weather,
the lead oxide sludge became a dust hazard and was controlled by
wetting down the pile with water. This process generated water
contaminated with suspended lead oxide particulate and soluble
lead salt that flowed out of the back of the saw building through
a small pipe and collected in surface depressions on the ground
surface. The battery casing chips stockpile also generated
runoff contaminated with lead oxide which tended to pond around
the stockpile during rainstorms. The black rubber battery
casings were ground into chunks and stockpiled on-site. These
rubber battery casing chips contained high concentrations of
lead. During rainstorms, lead particles were washed off into
surface ponds on-site. Approximately 3,200 cubic yards of
battery casing chips are currently stored in the former Saw
Building, and another approximately 800 cubic yards are in a pile
at the southeastern portion of the Site, near the former smelter
building.
The earliest Ohio EPA file reference regarding the AIM site dates
back to 1964 when a fish kill was reported in Painter Creek
caused by contamination conveyed via Sycamore Ditch. The Ohio
Department of Health requested that AIM initiate a program for
collecting, neutralizing, and disposing of battery acid. In
1972, the Ohio EPA personnel visited the AIM Site in response to
another fish kill in the local watershed and determined that the
source .of the discharge which resulted in the fish kill, came
from the AIM Site. In October 1973, the Ohio EPA's Division of
Waste Management and Engineering made the first of many site
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 3
-------
visits to investigate AIM'S operation. Over the next ten years,
the Ohio EPA conducted data collection activities and took legal
actions against AIM in an attempt to install on-site water
treatment and waste storage systems. In January 1974, the Ohio
EPA requested that the owner of the AIM Site apply for a Permit
to Install an acid treatment system. The Ohio EPA spent the next
2 years trying to get AIM to install the treatment system and
adhere to the conditions and restrictions of the permit.
In June 1979, the Ohio Attorney General on behalf of the Ohio EPA
initiated enforcement proceedings against AIM. In October 1979,
a Consent Decree was signed by the site owner to clean up the
site. However, cleanup efforts were not satisfactorily
completed. Subsequently, AIM was found to be in contempt of
court in April 1980. From April 1980, the Ohio Attorney
General's office continued to pursue legal actions for the
cleanup of the AIM Site. In September 1980, a Citation and
Notification of Penalty was issued to AIM for failure to install
a treatment system. The Ohio EPA requested in April 1982 that
legal action be taken to close the AIM facility. The AIM Company
ceased operations at the AIM Site in December 1982. The
processing equipment was removed by the owner in January 1983.
In January and February of 1986 approximately 300 cubic yards of
lead-contaminated soils from a site in downtown Arcanum ("AIM
II") were placed on the AIM Site during an emergency removal
action conducted by the owner of the AIM Site. The owner of the
AIM Site had operated the downtown site as a battery recycling
facility prior to startup of the present AIM facility location.
III. HIGHLIGHTS OP COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Various public meetings and availability sessions have been held
by the U.S. EPA in the Village of Arcanum, Ohio between 1985 and
the present to discuss the general progress of the AIM Superfund
Site.
On October 10, 1996, the U.S. EPA conducted Community Involvement
Plan interviews of residents and local politicians to update the
public regarding AIM Site activities. The U.S. EPA issued a
Proposed Plan for the AIM Site on January 27, 1997. The U.S. EPA
provided a public comment period on the AIM Site Proposed Plan
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 4
-------
from January 27, 1997, through February 25, 1997, and conducted
an evening public meeting on the AIM Proposed Plan on February
18, 1997, in the Village of Arcanum. The U.S. EPA's response to
the public comments received are summarized in the attached
Responsiveness Summary, which is Attachment A to this Record of
Decision ("ROD"). This ROD will become part of the
Administrative Record pursuant to the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Contingency Plan ("NCP") 40 C.F.R. Section
300.825(a)(2). The Administrative Record can be found at the
Site repositories located at:
1) Arcanum Public Library
101 West North Street
Arcanum, Ohio
2) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Records Center, 7th Floor
77 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL
IV. SCOPE OF SELECTED REMEDY
The U.S. EPA has selected a remedial action to amend the original
ROD for the AIM Site located in Arcanum, Ohio. The scope of the
selected remedial action consists of excavation of battery casing
chips for treatment to meet land disposal restrictions ("LDRs"),
and disposal at a U.S. EPA-approved Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act ("RCRA") Subtitle D Landfill ("an approved solid
waste landfill"), excavation of soils contaminated with lead in
excess of the cleanup level, and.disposal at an approved solid
waste landfill, backfilling excavated areas to grade with clean
soils, excavation and removal of an underground storage ("UST")
tank, demolition of the three buildings and associated footings
on-site, and disposal or recycling of the demolition debris,
drums, flat-bed trailers, and above-ground (500 gallon) tank in
an approved landfill. Because the proposed remedy will remove
the source of lead contamination, and because recent analyses
have demonstrated the absence of any groundwater contamination,
there are ho requirements to construct a solid waste cover on the
site. The major changes that have been made to the original
remedy selected in the September 26, 1986, ROD that are reflected
in this ROD Amendment are the modifications to the lead in soil
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 5
-------
cleanup level for both on-site and off-site soils, and the extent
of remediation under the new cleanup standards eliminating the
need for a RCRA cover system.
V. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS
During a July 17, 1996, visit to the AIM Site, representatives
from the U.S. EPA, the Ohio EPA, and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers ("USAGE") observed exposed uncontrolled piles of
battery casing chips and three buildings, two of which are
structurally damaged to the point that they are unsafe for reuse.
All three of the buildings create an attractive nuisance,
particularly for children and young adults within the local
community. In addition, a local farmer is using the former AIM
Site office building as a storage facility for farm vehicles and
implements. It is important to note that the AIM Site, although
not within the City limits, is at the very edge of town. This is
especially significant since 3,200 cubic yards of battery casing
chips are contained within a structurally unsound building, as
well as another 800 cubic yards of battery casing chips in a
waste pile on-site. Although the battery casing chips are
protected to some extent, at present, from rain and subsequent
run-off, when the former Saw Building collapses, the potential
for further release of lead into the environment will be greatly
increased through migration of lead-contamination to other media
(soil, groundwater, surface water via run-off, and air),
aggravating existing AIM Site conditions. The foundations of all
three buildings must be removed as part of the remedial action to
expedite the characterization of materials in and around the
foundations, which are likely to be contaminated with very high
concentrations of lead from the past disposal of spent battery
acid from the lead acid battery breaker operation, as well as the
suspected use of the battery casing chips for "fill" material.
In addition, there is an above-ground (500 gallon) tank located
on a flat-bed trailer on the AIM Site property, exposed to the
elements and rusting, with contents unknown. There are, in
addition, drums on the AIM Site premises, exposed to the elements
and rusting, with contents unknown. There is also a UST of
unknown size, content and condition buried on the AIM Site
property. This UST will require removal due to its location
within the area of contamination. There is documented
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 6
-------
trespassing on-site, despite a six foot fence around the
property, with unsecured gates.
Investigative information for the AIM Site indicates that the
surface soil lead concentrations are above the U.S. EPA and Ohio
EPA State,Action Levels. These same AIM Site soils are also
responsible for releases to surface water and the contamination
of surrounding soils outside the AIM Site operational boundaries,
as well as the sediments of Sycamore Ditch. The battery casing
chips and contaminated soils are exposed and represent a
continuing source of contamination at the AIM Site. The
principle contaminant is lead in soil and lead in battery casings
chips, as shown in the following chart:
Contaminant
Lead
Lead
Media
Soil
Battery
Casing Chips
Average
Concentration
Lead (ing/ kg or
ppm)1
20,000
30,000
High
Concentration
Lead (mg/kg or
ppm)
72,000
300,000
Previous groundwater investigations at the AIM Site have shown
historical groundwater contamination of up to 980 ppb2 lead. The
1985 Remedial Investigation detected lead in 2 of 8 residential
wells and 8 of 15 ground-water monitoring wells sampled.
Concentrations in three monitoring wells exceeded the interim
primary drinking water standards (50 ug/1) at the time the ROD
was signed. However, sampling logs indicated turbidity in these
samples. The same sampling methodology was used in 1989, and
lead was detected in 20 of 22 unfiltered monitoring well samples,
but filtered samples taken during the same sampling event were
found to be mostly non-detects, indicating that lead detections
were attributable to turbidity. Unfiltered and filtered samples
taken during sampling events in 1996, using low flow purging and
1 "milligrams per kilogram" or "mg/kg" is equivalent to "parts per million" or "ppm".
2 "micrograms per liter" or "ug/1" is equivalent to "parts per billion" or "ppb".
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
sampling methodology (not used previously) to minimize turbidity,
indicated no evidence of groundwater contamination at the AIM
Site.
There is currently no drinking water standard for lead, but
rather a technology-based action level of 15 ppb at the tap.
Although current sampling and analysis indicate that lead is not
mobilizing to groundwater, continued monitoring of the
groundwater and removal of the majority of the source of lead
will minimize any potential future impact to the groundwater.
The battery casing chips and lead-contaminated soils present not
only a continuing source of lead contamination and a potential
risk to human health and the environment from ingestion and
inhalation of surface soils, but also a potential threat through
the groundwater pathway.
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS
Exposures have occurred and continue to occur, since there is
evidence of ongoing trespassing activities at the AIM Site by
local residents. The greatest risk at the AIM Site is human
health, with the current risk from ingestion and_inhalation of
lead-contaminated soils and the potential for future groundwater
contamination if the source materials remain on-site. There are
no apparent threatened or endangered species in the immediate
vicinity of the AIM Site, but there are common flora and fauna
present.
Natural recovery would not occur if no action is taken. Removal
of the source material (i.e., battery casing chips and lead-
contaminated soils) from the AIM Site would reduce the
possibility that the source material could impact the groundwater
aquifer and water supply to adjacent residences.
The potential human health and environmental effects of releases
of lead-contaminated media from the site in the absence of any
remedial action were estimated. The main contaminant of concern
is lead because of high concentrations found in the contaminated
soils and waste materials, and battery casing chips. Direct and
indirect contact to environmental media contaminated by a release
from the AIM Site has the potential to result in-lead exposure
from the inadvertent ingestion and inhalation of soil and dust.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 8
-------
Receptors include humans, animals, and plants. Lead exposure in
children may result in learning disabilities caused by central
nervous system depression. Also, the potential exists for an
increased risk of exposure of the nearby population via the
migration of contaminated media by flooding.
The AIM Site is currently zoned 1-1 as an industrial district
within .the county and will be deed-restricted for that use. The
revised cleanup level for lead in soil of 1550 mg/kg, established
by the U.S. EPA in consultation with the Ohio EPA, was based on a
reasonably anticipated future land use as light industrial/
commercial property. The cleanup value of 1550 mg/kg was
determined to be protective of a developing fetus of a woman of
childbearing age exposed in the workplace. The cleanup value
(1550 mg/kg lead) was established by using the Adult Lead
Exposure Model to calculate the soil lead concentrations at which
a developing fetus of a worker exposed at the Site would have an
estimated risk of no greater than 5 percent of exceeding the 10
micrograms per deciliter ("ug/dl") blood lead level of concern.
In addition, an Ecological Evaluation completed by the USAGE in
February 1997, determined that the relatively low level of post-
remedial residual ecological risk would not be unacceptable.
This report is included in the Administrative Record for the
Site.
VII. REASON FOR ROD AMENDMENT
The AIM Site was proposed for listing on the National Priorities
List of Hazardous Waste Sites on December 30, 1982, and was made
final on September 8, 1983. The Remedial Investigation Report
was completed on August 9, 1985. The Feasibility Study Report
was completed on July 15, 1986. The ROD was signed on September
26, 1986. The original ROD called for the following actions:
»• Removal of on-site contaminated soils to 500 ppm lead.
Disposal of soils in an off-site RCRA Subtitle C landfill.
* Removal of off-site soils to background lead concentrations (30
ppm); disposal of soils between background and 500 ppm on-site.
Disposal of soils above 500 ppm in an off-site RCRA C landfill.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
* Continued monitoring of the groundwater semi-annually for 30
years.
* Improved site drainage.
»• Removal of remaining battery casings chips and "disposal in a
RCRA Subtitle C landfill.
»•'Demolition or decontamination of contaminated facilities on-
site.
>• Disposal of demolition debris in an off-site landfill.
* Record deed restrictions on land and aquifer use in the
affected areas.
The Predesign Investigation Report was completed on March 23,
1987. The Conceptual Design was completed in April 1988. The
AIM Site Investigation Report was completed in August 1989. The
Pilot Plant Report and the Economic Analysis Reports were
completed in June 1992.
In an effort to maintain consistency in remediating lead sites,
the U.S. EPA decided to investigate cleanup levels for the AIM
Site using current risk assessment methodologies. The cleanup
levels in the 1986 ROD were based on Agency guidance that
stipulated a range of 500 ppm to 1000 ppm for lead in soil as an
appropriate cleanup level for residential areas, not the
reasonably anticipated future site use as a light industrial/
commercial property. The 500 ppm lead in soil cleanup level for
the on-site soils does not conform to current U.S. EPA lead
cleanup practices based upon lead risk assessment methodologies
which were not available when the original ROD was signed.
A revised risk assessment was conducted by the U.S. EPA for on-
site soils using a model developed by the U.S. EPA's Technical
Review .Workgroup for Lead entitled "Methodology for Assessing
Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil", and site-
specific exposure scenarios. The Model assesses nonresidential
adult risks for lead utilizing a methodology which relates soil
lead intake to blood lead concentrations and is designed to
develop cleanup goals which protect the developing fetus of a
•
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 10
-------
site worker (woman of childbearing age) from adverse health
effects of exposure to lead.3 The Model was used to estimate the
soil lead concentration at which the probability of blood lead
concentrations in fetuses of women exposed to environmental lead
exceeding 10 ug/dl would be less than 5 percent.4
The revised risk assessment focused on recommending revised lead
in soil cleanup levels for the former operational areas of the
AIM Site that would be protective of human health. The results
of this risk assessment resulted in a value of 1536 mg/kg lead in
soil for a light industrial/commercial future use scenario, which
was rounded to 1550 mg/kg lead in soil for the on-site cleanup
level. In addition, a risk assessment for off-site soils was
conducted using the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic
("IEUBK") Model for Lead in Children, Version 0.99d, to determine
an appropriate cleanup value for protection of the residential
child. Based on the results of this model, the requirement to
clean off-site soils to the background concentration of 30 mg/kg
lead in soil was changed to a risk-based value of 400 mg/kg lead
in soil.
The revised cleanup values for the light industrial/commercial
(1550 mg/kg lead in soil) and the residential (400 mg/kg lead in
soil) future use scenarios are risk levels supported by the lead
models, and are based on average (mean) values for the receptor
exposure at the unit of concern. Although receptor exposure is
considered to be to the average lead concentration in the unit of
concern, these values are being applied as "not to exceed" values
for practical reasons, such as difficulty in removing random
3 The primary basis for the algorithms in the U.S. EPA Adult Lead Model used to calculate
the cleanup level is that fetuses and neonates are a highly sensitive population with respect to the
adverse effects of lead on development and that 10 ug/dl is considered to be a blood lead level of
concern from the standpoint of protecting the health of sensitive populations. *
* The U.S. EPA Technical Review Workgroup for Lead reported that the weight-of-evidence
from the scientific literature suggests that delayed or impaired neurodevelopment during the first 12
months of postnatal life can be associated with maternal blood lead levels during pregnancy or neonatal
blood lead levels at birth. A blood lead level of 10 ug/dL was recommended, based on the assumption
that the blood lead level of concern for fetuses is the same as that for children. This position is
supported in the National Research Council Committee on Measuring Lead Exposure in Infants,
Children, and Other Sensitive Populations Report (NRC 1993).
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 11
-------
spots of soil with elevated lead levels.
The draft risk assessment was received by the U.S. EPA on October
23, 1996. The revised Risk Assessment Report was finalized in
January 1997, and has been reviewed and approved by the U.S. EPA,
in consultation with the Ohio EPA. In addition, an Ecological
Evaluation completed by USAGE in February 1997 determined that
post-remedial residual ecological risk was not unacceptable.
This Ecological Evaluation Report is part of the Administrative
Record for the Site.
The original ROD is being amended to revise the cleanup levels
for lead in on-site soils to 1550 mg/kg, and the cleanup level
for lead in off-site soils to 400 mg/kg as set by U.S. EPA in
consultation with Ohio EPA.
VIII. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES
The following alternatives were revised to update the 1986 costs
and make these alternatives consistent with 1996 construction
costs.
Alternative 1: No Action (Original ROD Alternative AA-6)
The CERCLA of 1980 as amended by the SARA of 1986, requires that
the "No Action" alternative be evaluated at every site to
establish a baseline for comparison. This alternative assumes
that all lead-contaminated media remain in place as-is. The cost
is based upon the cost of groundwater monitoring over 30 years.
Total Costs: $ 400,000
(30 years)
Alternative 2: Original ROD Remedy (Original ROD Alternative AA-
3)
The Original ROD called for the following actions: Removal of on-
site contaminated soils to 500 ppm lead, followed by disposal in
an off-site RCRA Subtitle C landfill. Removal of off-site soils
to background lead concentrations (30 ppm lead); disposal of off-
site soils above 500 ppm lead in a RCRA Subtitle C landfill;
disposal of off-site soils between 30 ppm and 500 ppm lead, on-
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 12
-------
site. Groundwater would be monitored semiannually. Excavation
and treatment (if necessary) of an estimated 1200 cubic yards of
sediment from the Sycamore Ditch, followed by proper disposal.
Improved site drainage. Removal of remaining battery casings
chips and disposal in a RCRA Subtitle C landfill. Demolition of
or cleaning of on-site contaminated facilities. Disposal of
demolition debris in an off-site landfill. Enactment of deed
restrictions on land and aquifer use in the affected areas.
The remedial design costs presented below were based upon
excavation and proper disposal of the battery casing chips/
excavation and proper disposal of some, but not all of the
contaminated soils above 500 mg/kg lead in soil, and the
placement of a cover system over contaminated soils remaining on-
site.
Total Capital Costs: $16,600,000
OfcM Costs (30 years): $ 700,000
Land Acquisition $ 2,000,000
Total Costs: $19,300,000
Alternative 3: Ex-Situ Treatment of Battery Casing Chips;
Disposal of Stabilized Casing and Contaminated Soils at an Off-
site RCRA Landfill (New ROD Alternative).
The current proposal calls for the following actions to be taken
at the AIM Site: (1) removal of approximately 4,000 cubic yards
of battery casing chips found both in the buildings and in a
separate stockpile on the AIM Site; (2) treatment of battery
casing -chips either on-site, or off-site at a U.S. EPA-approved
RCRA Subtitle C treatment, storage, and disposal facility ("a
permitted TSDF"), to meet LDRs set forth in the Ohio
Administrative Code ("OAC") 3745-59-40, for a RCRA D008 waste,
followed by disposal in an approved landfill; (3) demolition and
removal of three buildings on the AIM Site in order to address
the foundations and remove contaminated soil and"suspected
battery casing chips down to six feet below grade,- (4) clearing
the Site of all trees, and disposal of cleared trees in
accordance with the Ohio EPA requirements; (5) removal and
disposal or recycling of demolition debris, drums, two rusting
flat-bed trailers, and one above-ground (500 gallon) tank; (6)
removal of an UST due to its location within the area of
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 13
-------
contamination; (7) investigation of sediments in Sycamore Ditch
and if contaminated with lead in excess of applicable standards,
removal, dewatering and placement of sediments contaminated with
lead at levels less than 1550 milligrams per kilogram ("mg/kg")
on the former operational area of the AIM Site; (8) removal of
contaminated soils to meet a revised cleanup level of 1550 mg/kg
lead in soil for soils within the former operational area of the
Site (within the existing fence line), and 400 mg/kg lead in soil
for soils outside the former operational area (outside the fence
line); (9) excavation and disposal of soils outside the former
operational area (outside the fence line) that are contaminated
with lead in excess of 400 mg/kg lead in soil but less than 1550
mg/kg lead in soil (primarily to the south and east of the Site
property), on the former operational area of the AIM Site; (10)
excavation and disposal of approximately 28,000 cubic yards of
soils and dewatered sediments contaminated with lead in excess of
1550 mg/kg that pass the toxicity characteristic leaching
procedure ("TCLP") test in an approved landfill; (11) treatment
of soils and dewatered sediments contaminated with lead in excess
of 1550 mg/kg that fail the TCLP test, either on-site or off-site
at a permitted TSDF to meet the LDRs, followed by disposal in an
approve'd landfill; (12) backfilling the excavated areas with
approximately 36,000 cubic yards of soil, assuming a 1.3 percent
"fluff" rate; (13) capping the clay drain tile that runs from the
AIM Site to Sycamore Ditch at the AIM Site during the
implementation of the remedial action, and either establishing a
new connection with the existing City of Arcanum storm water
collection system, or reconnecting with existing drain tiles once
remedial actions are complete; (14) maintaining and repairing the
private road (Pop Rite Lane) that contractor trucks must travel
over for the transportation and disposal of the battery casing
chips, contaminated soils, demolition debris, as well as hauling
backfill to the Site; resurfacing the private road once the
remedial design/remedial action ("RD/RA") phase is complete; (15)
monitoring of air, groundwater and surface waters during the
RD/RA phase; (16) recording deed restrictions for the Site; and
(17) maintaining site security throughout the RD/RA phases of
this project.
Total Capital Costs: $5,425,700
O&M Costs (30 Years): $ 400,000
Total Costs: $5,825,700
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 14
-------
The following nine criteria are used to evaluate cleanup
alternatives and provide the basis for selection of the final
cleanup action at Superfund sites. The following comparison of
alternatives considers the options for cleaning up the Site.
1. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
(addresses whether a remedy provides adequate protection of human
health and the environment and describes how risks posed through
each exposure pathway are eliminated, reduced or controlled
through treatment, engineering controls or institutional
controls}
Alternative 1 provides for no action and would not be protective
of human health and the environment. Alternative 2 would be
overly-protective for the defined land use and receptor
population based on the lower cleanup level of 500 nig/kg lead in
soil, for soils within the former operational area of the Site,
and a cleanup level of 30 ppm lead in soils (background levels)
for soils outside the former operational area of the Site.
However, under Alternative 2, since contaminated soils would be
left in place on the AIM Site, a solid waste cap would be
required in order to remove the risk pathways for both human
health and the environment. It has been determined that
Alternative 3 is protective of human health for the intended
future use of light industrial/commercial operations.
Alternatives 2 and 3 would be equally protective of the
environment because the battery casing chips would be removed
from the site, treated to meet LDRs, and disposed of properly in
an approved solid waste landfill. Under Alternative 2, some
contaminated soils would be left on-site, but would be placed
under a solid waste cap, inaccessible to environmental pathways.
Under Alternative 3, all contaminated soils in excess of the
cleanup levels for lead in soil, would be removed from the site
and treated (if necessary) either on-site or off-site at a
permitted TSDF to meet LDRs, followed by disposal in an approved
solid waste landfill. Under Alternative 3, on-site soils left in
place following remediation would contain less than 1550 mg/kg
lead. Areas excavated to remove contaminated soils would be
backfilled with clean fill and topsoil, and returned to grade.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 • 15
-------
Backfill and topsoil brought on-site would not exceed background
lead concentrations, so there would be no surface soil pathway to
environmental receptors. Under Alternatives 2 and 3, once
remediation is complete, there would be no significant migration
of lead from the on-site soils left in place. Therefore,
completion of Alternatives 2 and 3 would allow for site closure.
2. Compliance with ARARs {addresses how the preferred
alternatives comply with pertinent Federal and State
environmental laws and/or justifies a waiver. The ARARs with
which each alternative must comply are detailed ±n the Remedial
Investigation and Pre-Design Reports.}
Alternatives 2 and 3 would comply with Federal and State ARARs by
providing specific design and operating conditions that are
developed from specific requirements of these ARARs. Treatment
of air and wastewater would meet standards required for
compliance with State and Federal ARARs.
3. Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence {refers to the ability
of a remedy to maintain reliable protection of human health and
the environment over time}
Alternatives 2 and 3 would provide an effective permanent
solution in that the majority of the on-site contamination would
be removed from the site. Both Alternatives 2 and 3 would remove
the inherent hazard posed by the battery casing chips through
treatment and off-site disposal. Alternative 2 would remove the
direct contact threat with soils contaminated above the cleanup
level of 500 mg/kg lead by excavation, treatment (if necessary)
and off-site disposal of some of the contaminated soils, and
placement of a solid waste cap over the remaining contaminated
soils left in place. Alternative 3 would remove the direct
contact threat with soils contaminated with lead above the
cleanup level of 1550 mg/kg by excavation, treatment (if
necessary), and off-site disposal. Areas excavated to remove
contaminated soils would be backfilled with clean fill, and
returned to grade. In addition, an aggressive groundwater and
residential well monitoring program and, if necessary, corrective
action would be required that would ensure the future protection
of the aquifer.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 16
-------
4. Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment
{evaluates an alternative's use of treatment to reduce the
harmful nature of contaminants to the environment, and the amount
of contamination present)
Alternatives 2 and 3 would be effective in realizing the CERCLA
statutory preference for treatment of the contaminated battery
casing chips. Under Alternative 2, the mobility of contaminated
soils left-in-place would be decreased through containment, not
treatment. Alternative 3 would provide for reduction in toxicity
and mobility of the battery casing chips and soils contaminated
with lead above 1550 mg/kg lead in soil, that fail the TCLP test,
through a demonstrated treatment technology.
5. Short-term Effectiveness {addresses the ability of
alternatives to manage risks during construction and
implementation phases, and reduce immediate risks posed by the
hazardous materials present}
The primary short-term risk posed by Alternatives 2 and 3 would
be the exposure potential created during excavation and
transportation of the battery casings chips from the AIM Site to
a nearby approved solid waste landfill. On-site activities
(e.g., stabilization) represent minor exposure risks. The time
required to complete remediation is estimated to be approximately
6 months. This is based on the: (1) stabilization and
transportation of the battery casing chips to an approved solid
waste landfill; (2) excavation of soils contaminated with lead
above the cleanup level, and transportation to an approved solid
waste landfill; and (3) capping of remaining wastes on-site that
exceed the cleanup level for Alternative 2. Alternative 2 has a
greater short-term risk due to the increased volume of material
required for excavation and treatment, as well as construction of
a solid waste cap.
6. Implementability {is the technical and administrative
feasibility of a remedy, including the availability of goods and
services needed to implement a particular option}
Both Alternatives 2 and 3 are considered to be readily
implementable; the technologies used under these alternatives are
well-proven. Of the alternatives considered, Alternative 3 would
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 17
-------
be the most readily implementable.
7. Cost {includes estimated capital and operation and
maintenance costs}
A comparison of the costs are included in the table below.
ALTERNATIVE: DESCRIPTION
1: Original ROD Alternative AA-6
2: Original ROD Remedy AA-3
3 : New ROD Remedy
COSTS
$ 400,
$19,300,
$ 5,825,
000
000
700
Alternative 1 involves only the cost to monitor groundwater for
30 years, assuming a minimal number of samples analyzed for lead
on a semi-annual basis. Alternatives 2 and 3 are similar
actions, but are based on different cleanup criteria, and vary
according to the volume of materials required to be excavated.
Of the alternatives, Alternative 3 is the most cost-effective
remedial action.
8. Support Agency Acceptance {indicates whether, based on its
review of the Proposed Plan for a ROD Amendment, the support
agency -concurs, opposes, or has no comments on the preferred
alternative)
The Ohio EPA fully accepts and supports the selected remedial
action, Alternative 3, and is expected to concur with this
amendment to the original ROD.
•
9. Community Acceptance {summarizes the public's general
response to the alternatives described in this Proposed ROD
Amendment.}
The U.S. EPA provided a public comment period on the Proposed
Plan for a ROD Amendment from January 27, 1997, to February 25,
1997, and conducted a public meeting on the Proposed Plan in the
Village of Arcanum, Ohio, on February 18, 1997. The community
generally supports the change. No significant concerns were
raised during either the public meeting or during the public
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 18
-------
comment period. The U.S. EPA's response to the public comments
received are summarized in Attachment A to this ROD Amendment.
X. SELECTED REMEDY
The U.S. EPA has selected Alternative 3 to address the remaining
threats to human health and the environment at the Site. The
selected alternative involves the following:
* Excavation. Treatment, and Disposal of Battery Casing Chips:
Approximately 4,000 cubic yards of battery casing chips will be
excavated, treated to meet the LDRs applicable to non-lead acid
battery, RCRA D008 wastes, and disposed of in an approved solid
waste landfill.
» Clearing of the Site: The AIM Site will be cleared of all trees
and the cleared trees will be disposed of in accordance with the
OAC 3745-27-05 requirements. Trees will be cleared to as near
ground level as practical, but not over six (6) inches above
ground surface. The drums which have been left on-site by
previous contractors will be opened and the contents of those
drums will be tested for characteristic wastes, if necessary,
before being disposed of in an approved solid waste landfill.
The emptied drums will be cleaned, crushed, and disposed of along
with the demolition debris.
* Demolition of Existing Structures; The former office building
will be demolished to grade, along with the saw building and the
remains of the smelter. The demolition debris will be
transported and disposed of at an approved solid waste landfill.
Any dilapidated equipment, including the two rusted out flat-bed
trailers found on-site, and the 500 gallon tank will be
demolished and disposed of along with the demolition debris.
Recycling of materials is acceptable upon meeting the applicable
RCRA requirements.
* Excavation and Removal of Former Office. Saw, and Smelter
Buildings Foundations and Contaminated Soils: The foundations of
the former Office, Saw and Smelter Buildings will be removed.
Gross soils will be removed from the concrete, and the concrete
disposed of at an approved solid waste landfill. Lead-
contaminated soils above the cleanup level and any battery casing
AIM ROD. AMENDMENT
June 1997 19
-------
chips will be excavated from below and adjacent to each building.
» UST Removal: An' UST will be removed due to its location within
the contaminated area, and disposed of at an approved solid waste
landfill, along with associated contaminated soils, sludges, and
liquids in accordance with the OAC 1301:7-9-16 requirements. The
UST is located at the northwest corner of the office building.
* Pre-Excavation Confirmatory Soil Sampling: Confirmatory soil
sampling will be conducted of the contaminated areas on the AIM
Site prior to excavation of the soils, but after the battery
casing chips have been removed. The details of this sampling,
including sampling locations and analytical methods, will be set
forth in approved design documents.
> Contaminated Soils: On-site soils that are contaminated with
lead in excess of the cleanup level (1550 mg/kg lead in soil)
will be excavated and disposed of at an approved solid waste
landfill, along with any off-site soils that also exceed the 1550
mg/kg lead in soil cleanup level; off-site soils contaminated
with lead in excess of 400 mg/kg, but less than 1550 mg/kg total
lead in soil, will be excavated and placed on the former
operational area of the AIM Site (inside the fence). Soils
contaminated with lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg lead in soil that
pass the TCLP test, will be disposed of at an approved solid
waste landfill. Soils contaminated with lead in excess of 1550
mg/kg lead in soil that fail the TCLP test, will be treated
eithejr on-site or off-site at a permitted TSDF, to meet LDRs,
followed by disposal at an approved solid waste landfill.
* Excavation Requirements: If the clay layer associated with the
semi-confined aquifer at the AIM Site is penetrated during
excavation activities, water might rise into the.excavation.
This phenomenon would be dependent on current AIM Site conditions
due to seasonal weather conditions. The lead-contaminated
groundwater or any water would have to be treated to meet the
substantive requirements of the Clean Water Act, National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit
requirements set forth OAC 3745-33-04, the pretreatment
requirements set forth at OAC 3745-36-07, or local limits set by
a publicly owned treatment works, if the water was discharged
off-site. Therefore, excavation activities will use engineering
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 20
-------
controls to minimize any adverse impacts due to AIM Site
geological and hydro-geological conditions. Additionally,
fugitive emissions resulting from excavation activities will be
controlled in accordance with OAC 3745-17-08(B).
* X-Ray Fluorescence ("XRF") Field Sampling Instrumentation: The
XRF field sampling technology will be used to determine the soils
that are above the cleanup level and that will be excavated and
disposed of at an approved solid waste landfill. The calibration
of the XRF instrument will be verified. The XRF instrument
calibration standards will be analyzed as required by the
manufacturer. In addition, at a minimum, a quality check of 10
percent of all XRF field measurements with off-site definitive
laboratory analyses will be done, in accordance with approved
design documents. If XRF field sampling instrumentation is not
technically feasible or cost-effective, either off-site or mobile
on-site laboratory analysis will be conducted in accordance with
the approved design documents to determine soils requiring
excavation and off-site disposal.
> Post-Excavation Confirmatory Soil Sampling: Post-excavation
soil sampling will be conducted to confirm that all soils with
lead contamination in excess of the cleanup level, have been
excavated and removed from the AIM Site. Sampling and analytical
requirements for determining whether the cleanup"level has been
met will be set forth in the approved design documents.
* Sediment in Sycamore Ditch: Samples of the sediment in the
Sycamore Ditch will be taken to confirm the presence or absence
of lead-contamination. If there is no evidence of lead
contamination in the sediments, no further action will be
necessary with respect to the sediments. However, if sampling
indicates that the sediments are contaminated with lead, the
values of lead in the sediment will be screened against the
Ontario Sediment Quality Guidelines5 to determine if toxicity
testing is appropriate. In addition, the National Oceanic and
5Persaud, D., J. Jaagumagi, and A. Hay ton. 1993. Guidelines for the Protection and
Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario. Ministry of Environment and Energy, Toronto.
PIBS 1962. 24 pp.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 21
-------
Atmospheric Administration6 guidance will also be used. If
adverse effects are apparent, the U.S. EPA, in consultation with
the Ohio EPA, will use the toxicity tests results to derive a
cleanup level for contaminated sediments in Sycamore Ditch. If
considered necessary by the U.S. EPA, remediation of the
contaminated sediments will be undertaken including, but not
limited to, removal of the contaminated sediments from the
Sycamore Ditch, dewatering of those sediments, and placement of
the dewatered sediments contaminated with lead at levels less
than 1550 mg/kg, on the former operational area of the AIM Site.
The dewatered sediments that are contaminated with lead in excess
of 1550 mg/kg, that pass the TCLP test, will be disposed of at an
approved solid waste landfill. The dewatered sediments that are
contaminated with lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg, that fail the
TCLP test, will be treated to meet LDRs and disposed of at an
approved solid waste landfill. Off-site or mobile on-site
laboratory analyses will be used to determine the sediments that
are above the cleanup level of 1550 mg/kg.
> Treatment/Disposal: Before waste materials are removed from the
AIM Site, it must be determined whether or not those waste
materials are contaminated by hazardous waste, and therefore,
must be managed as a hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA.
This determination can be made either through knowledge of the
composition of the waste, or by testing the waste material using
the TCLP test. The TCLP test will be used at the AIM Site to
determine whether or not the soils and sediments that are
contaminated with lead in excess of the cleanup level of 1550
mg/kg lead in soil, are non-hazardous and should go directly to
an approved solid waste landfill without any treatment, or are
characteristic for lead and therefore, hazardous, and need to be
treated, either on-site or off-site at a permitted TSDF, to meet
LDRs. Soils and sediments contaminated with lead less than the
cleanup level of 1550 mg/kg lead in soil, that are left in place
at the AIM Site, would not be subject to any hazardous waste
management requirements, including any testing. Contaminated
soils and contaminated sediments that fail the TCLP test will be
6Long, E. And L. Morgan. 1990. The Potential for Biological Effects of Sediment-Sorbed
Contaminants Tested in the National Status and Trends Program. NOAA Technical Memorandum
NOS OMA 52. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 22
-------
treated to meet LDRs and pass the TCLP test, followed by disposal
in an approved solid waste landfill. The soils and sediments
contaminated with lead above the cleanup level, that meet LDRs
and pass the TCLP test, will be disposed of at an approved solid
waste landfill, without further treatment.
The battery casing chips found at the AIM Site must be stabilized
to meet the LDRs for a non-lead acid battery RCRA D008 waste and
pass the TCLP test, prior to disposal in an approved solid waste
landfill. In practical terms, this means that the leachate
produced from the stabilized material when subjected to the TCLP
test, must be less than the value set forth in the LDRs for that
material. If so, the stabilized battery casing chips would
"pass" the TCLP and meet the LDRs, and could be transported off-
site to an approved solid waste landfill for final disposal. The
battery casing chips will either be treated on-site or at a
permitted TSDF to meet LDRs, followed by disposal in an approved
solid waste landfill. If the battery casing chips are treated
off-site, the battery casing chips will be sent directly to a
permitted TSDF for treatment to meet the LDRs, followed by
disposal in an approved solid waste landfill. If the battery
casing chips are treated on-site, each batch of the treated
battery casing chips will be tested by the TCLP. The definition
of a batch will be based upon the size that develops the optimum
performance for the on-site treatment plant used for treatment of
battery casing chips or lead-contaminated soils.* Each batch that
passes the TCLP test will be disposed of at an approved solid
waste landfill. If a batch of treated battery casing chips fails
the TCLP test, that batch will be treated until it meets the
LDRs.
The decision to treat soils and sediments contaminated with lead
in excess of 1550 mg/kg, that fail the TCLP test, and battery
casing chips, on-site or at a permitted TSDF will be made during
the RD/RA phase. Other residues will be managed in accordance
with approved design documents.
+ Groundwater Monitoring: In general, the Field Sampling Plan
developed by the USAGE for groundwater and residential well
sampling shall be followed. Since the groundwater flows
generally in an easterly direction toward Sycamore Ditch, and
there is a residential well within less than one quarter of a
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 23
-------
mile of the AIM Site, the action level for lead for the AIM Site
shall be set at 15 ppb, which is the current technology-based
action level for lead in drinking water under the Safe Drinking
Water Act. The direction of groundwater flow will be
established, and a minimum of four wells will be used to monitor
groundwater quality and flow in the vicinity of the unit, one up-
gradient, three down-gradient. Additional groundwater sampling
wells may be added, if necessary, based upon the results of the
groundwater flow measurements, and due to the proximity of the
AIM Site to Sycamore Ditch. After background analytical data are
established for the well system, the groundwater and residential
well monitoring will be performed quarterly, with appropriate
physical and chemical parameters measured and compared to
background levels previously collected. If the data from a water
sample shows a significant statistical increase or change in the
parameter measured, the groundwater from the well will be
resampled to verify that the changes in the data"are accurate and
precise. If the re-sampling event verifies a change in a
measured parameter, an assessment of the release will be
conducted, followed by corrective action, if necessary. The fact
that the aquifer is a source of drinking water may require
additional provisions which would maintain the useability of the
aquifer. Other physical and chemical parameters of monitoring
may be considered, along with lead, on a site-specific basis. If
the only parameter sampled and analyzed for is lead, and if it is
detected at an elevated level, then other parameters (metals)
would be monitored for in subsequent rounds of confirmatory
sampling. After the first year of testing, if no detections are
made for other metals, the U.S. EPA and the Ohio EPA would re-
evaluat'e both the frequency and the parameters for sampling. The
exact details of the long-term monitoring program will be worked
out during the RD/RA phase, including details of compliance
monitoring, if necessary. In accordance with CERCLA and the NCP
(40 C.F.R. Part 300), the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the Ohio
EPA, will re-evaluate the groundwater monitoring^requirements to
determine if they continue to be necessary at the B^year review.
The technical groundwater monitoring requirements for this site
shall be approved by the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the Ohio
EPA.
* Monitoring of Surface Waters and Air: Monitoring of the surface
waters and air will be performed during the remedial action.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 24
-------
*• Access Road Restoration: The access road (Pop Rite Lane, if
used) to the AIM Site will be maintained and repaired to
equivalent or better condition as prior to the initiation of the
AIM Site remedial actions. The private road will be used by
contractor trucks to transport and dispose of the battery casing
chips, contaminated soils, demolition debris, as well as to haul
backfill to the Site. Once the RD/RA phase of the project is
complete, the private road will be resurfaced.
>• Excavation and Non-Excavation Area Backfill. Grading. Topsail.
Erosion Control, and Revegetation: In addition to erosion control
and revegetation of all backfilled areas, all areas disturbed
during the remedial action will be filled and graded with clean
fill. The Site will be graded in such a way as to promote
positive site drainage and to prevent ponding of waters on the
site, once remedial actions are complete. At least six inches of
suitable top soil will be placed on the entire site for
revegetation. Drainage ditches, drainage swales, and erosion
control methods will be implemented to prevent surface runoff
from eroding the final grade and from flowing toward the adjacent
properties.
* Deed Restrictions: Restrictive covenants will be executed and
recorded with the Darke County Recorder. The deed restrictions
filed with the Recorder of Darke County will ensure that: (l) the
AIM Site is used only for light industrial/commercial operations;
and (2) these restrictions run with the property.
> AIM Site Security During RD/RA Phase: The existing fence
surrounding the AIM Site will be repaired and maintained
throughout the RD/RA phases, to control Site access and prevent
vandalism.
XI. ARARs COMPLIANCE
The substantive requirements set forth in the rules and
regulations identified below are applicable or relevant and
appropriate requirements ("ARARs") to the remedial action at the
Site.
Clean Water Act (Ohio Authorized Proerram)
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 25
-------
Direct or indirect water discharges will comply with the
following:
a. water discharge criteria pursuant to OAC 3745-33-04;
and
b. water discharge criteria pursuant to OAC 3745-36-07.
Safe Drinkin Water Act (Ohio Authorized
If the lead action level of 15 ppm is exceeded, corrective action
shall be implemented pursuant to OAC 3745-8-80.
Clean Air Act (Ohio Authorized
Fugitive air emissions resulting from response activities shall
be controlled pursuant to OAC 3745-17-08 (B) .
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Ohio Authorized Program)
Response activities associated with:
a. closure of USTs shall comply with OAC 1301:7-9-16;
b. off -site shipments of hazardous waste shall comply with
manifest requirements pursuant to OAC 3745-52-20, 22,
23, 30, 31, 32 and 33;
c. closure of waste piles shall comply with OAC 3745-55-
11; and
d.' off -site disposal of hazardous waste shall comply with
land disposal treatment standards pursuant to OAC 3745-
59-40.
Other Federal and State R
Response activities shall comply with the following:
a. OSHA requirements pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.120;
b. Department of Transportation requirements pursuant to
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 26
-------
49 CFR Part 171;
c. Water well standards pursuant to OAC 3745-9-04(A)(B) ;
OAC 3745-9-05(A)(1) and (B) to (G); OAC 3745-9-06 (A),
(B), (D) and (E); OAC 3745-9-07; OAC 3745-9-08; OAC
3745-9-09 (A) to (D)(1), (E) and (F); OAC 3745-9-10;
and
d. Solid waste disposal requirements pursuant to OAC 3745-
27-05.
XII. STATUTORY DETERMINATION
Based on information available at this time, the U.S. EPA
believes that Alternative 3 provides the best balance among the
evaluation criteria. The results of the Pre-Design, Pilot Plan,
Economic Analysis, the revised Risk Assessment Report, and the
Ecological Evaluation, along with other technical documents found
in the Administrative Record, demonstrate that the selected
alternative is more easily implemented and more cost-effective
than Alternative 2. The selected Alternative 3 is protective of
human h'ealth and the environment, complies with Federal and State
ARARs and is cost-effective. The selected remedial action
utilizes permanent solutions and considered the use of
alternative treatment technologies to the maximum extent
practicable. This remedy addresses the statutory preference for
treatment that reduces toxicity, mobility, or volume as a
principal element by treating the battery casing chips, as well
as soils and sediments contaminated with lead in excess of 1550
mg/kg that fail the TCLP test, to meet LDRs and pass the TCLP
test. Due to the significant volume of waste at the Site, soils
contaminated with lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg that pass the TCLP
test will not be treated in order to remain on-site, but will be
disposed of at an approved landfill. A review will be conducted
to ensure that the remedy continues to provide adequate
protection of human health and the environment within five years
after commencement of the remedial action.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 27
-------
APPENDIX A - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
TO THE
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SUPERFUND SITE
ARCANUM, TWIN TOWNSHIP, DARKE COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
APPENDIX A - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
TOTHE
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SUPERFUND SITE
ARCANUM, TWIN TOWNSHIP, DARKE COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
APPENDIX A TO THE RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SUPERFUND SITE
VILLAGE OF ARCANUM, TWIN TOWNSHIP, DARKE COUNTY, OHIO
PURPOSE
The responsiveness summary has been prepared to meet the requirements of Sections
113(k)(2)(B)(iv) and 117(b) of CERCLA of 1980 which requires the U.S. EPA to respond to the
comments submitted, either written or oral presentations, on the proposed plan for remedial
action. All comments received by the U.S. EPA during the public comment period were
considered in the selection of the final remedial alternative for the AIM Site located in the
Village of Arcanum, Twin Township, Darke County, Ohio.
This document summarizes written and oral comments received during the public comment
period of January 27, 1997, to February 25, 1997. The comments have been paraphrased to
efficiently summarize them in this document. The public meeting was held at 7:00 p.m. on
February 18, 1997, in the Fire Station in Arcanum, Ohio. A full transcript of the public meeting,
as well as all written comments received during the public comment period and all site related
documents, are available for review at the Information Repositories at the following locations:
(1) Arcanum Public Library, 101 West North Street, Arcanum, Ohio; and (2) U.S. EPA Region 5
Superfund Division, Records Center, 7th Floor, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois, 60604-
3590.
OVERVIEW
The proposed remedial alternative for the AIM Site was announced to the public just prior to the
beginning of the public comment period. The U.S. EPA proposed the following remedial action
to be taken at the AIM Site: (1) removal of approximately 4,000 cubic yards of lead acid battery
casing chips ("battery casing chips") found both in the buildings and in a separate stockpile on
the AIM Site; (2) treatment of the battery casing chips either on-site, or off-site at a U.S. EPA-
approved Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") Subtitle C treatment, storage, and
disposal facility ("a permitted TSDF"), to meet the land disposal restrictions ("LDRs"), followed
by disposal in an approved landfill; (3) demolition and removal of three buildings on the AIM
Site in order to address the foundations and remove contaminated soil and suspected battery
casing chips down to six feet below grade; (4) clearing the Site of all trees; (5) removal and
disposal or recycling of demolition debris, drums, flat-bed trailers, and an above-ground (500
gallon) tank; (6) removal of an Underground Storage Tank ("UST") due to its location within the
area of contamination; (7) investigation of sediments in Sycamore Ditch and if contaminated
with lead in excess of applicable standards, removal, dewatering and placement of sediments
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-l
-------
contaminated with lead at levels less than 1550 milligrams per kilogram ("mg/kg") on the former
operational area of the AIM Site; (8) removal of contaminated soils to meet a revised cleanup
level of 1550 mg/kg lead in soil for soils within the former operational area of the Site (within
the existing fence line), and 400 mg/kg lead in soil for soils outside the former operational area
(outside the fence line); (9) disposal of soils outside the former operational area (outside the
fence line) that are over 400 mg/kg lead but under 1550 mg/kg lead on the former operational
area; (10) disposal of soils and sediments contaminated with lead in exce'ss of 1550 mg/kg that
pass the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure ("TCLP") test in an approved landfill; (11)
treatment of soils and sediments contaminated with lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg that fail the
TCLP test, either on-site or off-site at a permitted TSDF to meet the LDRs, followed by disposal
in an approved landfill; (12) placement of approximately 36,000 cubic yards of soil in the
excavated areas; (13) capping the clay drain tile that runs from the AIM Site to Sycamore Ditch
at the AIM Site and connecting to the existing Village of Arcanum storm water collection
system, or reconnecting the drain with existing drain tiles once remedial actions are complete;
(14) maintaining and repairing the private road (Pop Rite Lane), if used, that contractor trucks
must travel over for the transportation and disposal of the battery casing chips, contaminated
soils, demolition debris, as well as hauling backfill to the Site; resurfacing the private road once
the remedial design/remedial action ("RD/RA") phase is complete; (15) monitoring the
ground water, air and surface water at the Site during the RD/RA phase; (16) recording deed
restrictions for the Site; and (17) maintaining site security throughout the RD/RA phases of this
project.
I. Comments on the January 1997 Proposed Plan
1. Comment: Would it be cheaper to move the houses or buy them?
Response: The selected remedial action at the AIM Site will remove all of the sources of
lead contamination in the soils, and battery casing chips, and is restricted to an
approximately 4.5 acre area on Mr. Harold Shane's property. Deed restrictions will be
placed on the property to prevent homes from being built on the 4.5 acre property. The
local residences are not impacted by any lead-contamination, and therefore, there is no
justification for extending the remediation beyond the AIM Site boundaries.
2. Comment: The old Hanes farm floods with water. The town knows it and must be
drained before houses can be built. This is a farm along Blank Street.
Response: The selected remedial action at the AIM Site will remove all of the sources of
lea/1 contamination in the soils, and battery casing chips, and is restricted to an
approximately 4.5 acre area on Mr. Harold Shane's property. Deed restrictions will be
placed on the property to prevent homes from being built on the 4.5 acre property. The
local residences are not impacted by any lead-contamination, and therefore, there is no
justification for extending the remediation beyond the AIM Site boundaries. In addition,
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-2
-------
as part of the selected remedial action at the Site, the clay drain tile that runs from the
AIM Site to Sycamore Ditch will either be capped and a new connection with the existing
Village of Arcanum storm water collection system will be established, or the existing
drain tile will be reconnected with existing drain tiles once remedial actions are complete,
which may improve drainage of surrounding properties.
3. Comment; It would be cheaper for you to seal off the place and pay people for their
property. You could also offer to move houses for people to a new location. You could
buy a piece of land to put them on.
Response: The selected remedial action at the AIM Site will remove all of the sources of
lead contamination in the soils, and battery casing chips, and is restricted to an
approximately 4.5 acre area on Mr. Harold Shane's property. Deed restrictions will be
placed on the property to prevent homes from being built on the 4.5 acre property. The
local residences are not impacted by any lead-contamination, and therefore, there is no
justification for extending the remediation beyond the AIM Site boundaries.
•
4. Comment: I believe lots of young people would buy the houses like mine if they were
sold for the purpose of removing them. Especially if sold cheap enough.
Response: The selected remedial action at the AIM Site will remove all of the sources of
lead contamination in the soils, and battery casing chips, and is restricted to an
approximately 4.5 acre area on Mr. Harold Shane's property. Deed restrictions will be
placed on the property to prevent homes from being built on the 4.5 acre property. The
local residences are not impacted by any lead-contamination, and therefore, there is no
justification for extending the remediation beyond the AIM Site boundaries.
5. Comment: I was poisoned on lead one time and believe me, you don't want lead
poisoning. I painted and I got lead poisoning. And I took nerve medicine for years and I
had trouble with my eyes and there's nothing you can do with your eyes but just put up
with it until it's out of your system. You don't want lead poisoning. Believe me on that.
Response: The U.S. EPA is very concerned about the potential for lead poisoning, and the
reason for this remedial action at the AIM Site is specifically to remove the sources of
lead, ensuring the protection of human health and the environment.
6. Comment: I am glad you've looked into the situation. And there are so many interested
people here. I submit that long-term effectiveness and permanence is a partial solution, if
not fully met; is that correct. I don't think it is fully met. I think it is partial.
Response: The U.S. EPA, in selecting the remedy, is required to evaluate all alternatives
against nine criteria, which are used to evaluate cleanup alternatives and provide the basis
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-3
-------
for selection of the final cleanup action at Superfund sites. Two of the nine criteria are
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence, which refers to the ability of a remedy to
maintain reliable protection of human health and the environment over time, and Cost.
which includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs. The U.S. EPA
believes that the selected remedy will provide the best balance between all nine criteria,
which are presented below:
1. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment {addresses whether
a remedy provides adequate protection of human health and the environment and
describes how risks posed through each exposure pathway are eliminated, reduced
or controlled through treatment, engineering controls or institutional controls}
2. Compliance with ARARs {addresses how the preferred alternatives comply with
pertinent Federal and State environmental laws and/or justifies a waiver. The
ARARs with which each alternative must comply are detailed in the Remedial
Investigation and Pre-Design Reports.}
3. Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence {refers to the ability of a remedy to
maintain reliable protection of human health and the environment over time}
4. Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment {evaluates an
alternative's use of treatment to reduce the harmful nature of contaminants to the
environment, and the amount of contamination present}
5. Short-term Effectiveness {addresses the ability of alternatives to manage risks
during construction and implementation phases, and reduce immediate risks posed
by the hazardous materials present}
6. Implementability {is the technical and administrative feasibility of a remedy,
including the availability of goods and services needed to implement a particular
option}
7. Cost {includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs}
8. Support Agency Acceptance {indicates whether, based on its review of the
Proposed Plan for a ROD Amendment, the support agency concurs, opposes, or
has no comments on the preferred alternative}
9. Community Acceptance {summarizes the public's general response to the
alternatives described in this Proposed ROD Amendment.}
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-4
-------
7. Comment: My concern is what direction the trucks will be going when hauling loads of
dirt. What type of trucks? How big? Our streets in the Village of Arcanum are not like
superhighways. So, will our village have a say in what or which direction trucks will be
going?
Response: The U.S. EPA will work with representatives of the Village of Arcanum, Twin
Township, and Darke County to ensure that the selected remedy will not cost the local
community any additional funds for repair or maintenance of the streets. In general, it is
the experience of the U.S. EPA that this remedial action will not significantly increase the
load or vehicular traffic on the streets to the point of disrepair. In addition, the size of the
trucks and vehicular patterns will be determined in conjunction with local authorities.
8. Comment: Water table in and around Arcanum is fairly high and I'm wondering if they
dig too deep, water will be coming into the excavation. If so, the water will be pumped
out. Filtered. Pumped to where?
Response: The U.S. EPA has already analyzed this concern in its proposed plan and
selected remedy. In particular, the U.S. EPA has addressed this concern under
Excavation Requirements in the selected remedy. Basically, if the clay layer associated
with the semi-confined aquifer at the AIM Site is penetrated during excavation activities,
and water rises into the excavation, any such waters would have to be treated and
disposed of in accordance with the substantive requirements of the Clean Water Act,
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit requirements, or the
pretreatment requirements of a local publicly owned treatment works, if the water was
discharge off-site. The Clean Water Act/NPDES requirements will ensure that the water,
if any, is cleaned prior to discharge and will not pollute any other properties or waterways
in the area.
9. Comment: We were notified last year that Darke County's planning on resurfacing and
widening Arcanum-Ithaca Road from Ithaca to Arcanum. Now, it doesn't make sense if
you guys repave, if Darke County repaves that road and you guys tear it up and repave it
again. I mean if this is all going to take place, could they put a hold on that and maybe
not the sections your guys are going to use? I realize that site needs to be cleaned up, but
it doesn't seem right if you guys have to head south or whatever you're going to pave at.
Response: The U.S. EPA will work with representatives of the Village of Arcanum, Twin
Township, and Darke County to ensure that the selected remedy will not cost the local
community any additional funds for repair or maintenance of the streets. In general, it is
the experience of the U.S. EPA that this remedial action will not significantly increase the
load or vehicular traffic on the streets to the point of disrepair. In addition, the size of the
trucks and vehicular patterns will be determined in conjunction with local authorities.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-5
-------
II. Comments to the U.S. EPA's February 1997 Ecological Evaluation Report
10. General Comment: An ecological evaluation for the AIM Site was prepared in February
1997 by United States Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District ("USAGE"), on behalf
of the U.S. EPA Region 5. The ecological evaluation was subsequently distributed to the
appropriate Federal and State Agencies, including the United States Department of
Interior ("USDOI") by the U.S. EPA Region 5. The document addresses the following
concerns:
Protectiveness of the Remedy
11. Comment: The EPA proposed to leave contaminated soils of the former operational area
with levels of lead of up to 1,550 ppm and contamination of up to 400 ppm in soils
outside that area. It is not clear from the proposed action description that this will protect
migratory birds that are expose to the site. The Department [USDOI] has requested and
will evaluate available ecological risk data for potential residual threat to migratory birds
and their habitats.
Response: The Ecological Evaluation addressed potential risk to representative species
from contamination remaining after implementation of the preferred remedial alternative
in the Proposed Plan. Potential residual risk to representative avian species evaluated in
Section 7.4 of the Ecological Evaluation included the red-tailed hawk and the American
woodcock.
12. Comment: The EPA should provide the acreage, lead levels and locations of soils below
the cleanup levels. We suggest a map with isopleths in steps of 250 ppm to show the
reader how site contamination will be addressed and where contamination will remain.
Response: Section 2 of the Ecological Evaluation gives a description of the 4.5 acre site
and surrounding properties. Appendix B, Figure G-8, shows the Site and surrounding
properties. Appendix C and Figure G-2 provide details on the ownership, acreage, and
zoning of lands adjacent to the AIM Site.
Section 2 also discusses pre- and post-remedial lead concentrations. Data from the 1985
RI and 1989 Pre-Design Site Investigation was used in the Ecological Evaluation to
evaluate the ecological risk to on-site and off-site areas at the AIM Site. Drawings
showing site lead soil and sediment concentrations based on existing data and a
conceptual site excavation plan were prepared to aid in the discussion of residual risk.
See Figures G-l through G - 7. See Appendix D for a discussion of the assumptions
used, Table A -1 for a summary of existing and estimated post-remedial soil lead
concentrations and Table A - 2 for raw data.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-6
-------
Post-Remediation vegetation and habitat
13. Comment: Contingent upon the final location, extent, and levels of lead remaining on the
site the Department [USDOI] may have additional concerns or recommendations for the
grading and revegetation plans as they relate to fish and wildlife habitat.
Response: Please see Section 2 of the Ecological Evaluation for a discussion of pre- and
post-remedial lead concentrations. The on-site property is currently zoned for
commercial/industrial use and the most likely future land use for the property is as a
commercial/industrial facility. The U.S. EPA preferred remedial alternative requires that
the entire site be cleared and grubbed. Soils which are above the regional groundwater
table and have lead concentrations in excess of 1550 mg/kg are to be removed. All
excavated areas are to be replaced with clean backfill and topsoil. The site will be graded
to promote positive drainage, and revegetated. After the remedial activities are complete,
the undeveloped site will provide habitats similar to the surrounding agricultural area.
AIM ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-7
-------
APPENDIX B - ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
TO THE
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SUPERFUND SITE
ARCANUM, TWIN TOWNSHIP, DARKE COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 5
77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD
CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590
REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF:
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SMR-7J
February 28, 1997
Ms. Shirley Norris
Arcanum Public Library
101 North Street
Arcanum, OH 45304
Subject: Arcanum Iron & Metal Site -- Update #2
Dear Ms. Norris:
Enclosed is an update to the Administrative Record file for the
above noted site. Please place the documents with the preceding
records.
Again, thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact me at (312)353-5821.
Sincerely,
ranet Pfilmdheller,
uperfuod Records Manager
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
REMEDIAL ACTION
ARCANUM IRON AND METAL SITE
ARCANUM, OHIO
UPDATE #2
O2726797
OOCt DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES
1 02/00/97 Department of the U.S. EPA Ecological Evaluation For The Arcanui Iron 69
Any, Corps of And Ketal Superfund Site
Engineers
-------
I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 5
"***• 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD
CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590
REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SMR-7J
February 12, 1997
Ms. Shirley Morris
Arcanum Public Library
101 North St.
Arcanum, OH 45304
Subject: Arcanum Iron & Metal Site — Update #1
Dear Ms. Norris:
Enclosed is an update to the Administrative Record file for the
above noted site. Please place the documents with the preceding
records.
Again, thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact me at (312)353-5821.
Sincerely,
Sinet Pttindheller,
Superfujrid Records Manager
Primed on Recycled Paper
-------
U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
REMEDIAL ACTION
ARCANUM IRON & METAL SITE
ARCANUM, OHIO
UPDATE #1
02/11/97
90CI DATE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
1 00/00/00 Hoelscher, R., U.S. Kleiun, J., U.S.
EPft EPfl
Neiorandui re: Regulatory Status of Batteries
M/Attachaents
IB
2 07/00/86 U.S. EPA
3 03/23/87 CH2H Hill
Public
U.S. EPA
4 05/00/88 Baker/TSA, Inc. U.S. Any Corps of
Engineers/U.S. EPA
5 08/00/89 Baker/TSA, Inc. U.S. EPA
6 08/00/91 Donohue 4 Associate- U.S. EPA
s, Inc.
7 06/00/92 Sverdrup Environien- U.S. EPA
tal
Fact Sheet: 'Feasibility Study' 4
Predesign Report for the Selected Reaedy at 42
the Arcanui Iron 4 Hetal Site
Site Saipling Plan: Pre-Design Investigations 77
Report and Conceptual Design at the Arcanue
Iron 4 Hetal Site
Site Investigation Report for the Arcanun 231
Iron 4 Netal Site
Revised Conunity Relations Plan for the 32
Arcanui Iron 4 Hetal Site
Economic Anal/sis Report for the United Scrap 114
Lead and Arcanui Iron 4 Hetal Sites
3 06/00/92 Sverdrup Environ»en- U.S. EPA
tal
Pilot Plan Report for the United Scrap Lead
and Arcanui iron 4 Hetal Sites
295
9 02/26/93 Fabinski, L., U.S. EPA/NND
USDHHS/USPHS/ATSDR
10 03/29/96 Boseian, A., U.S. Herring, 6., U.S.
EPA Aray Corps of
Engineers
11 04/01/96 Schenk, K., U.S. Boseian, A., U.S.
Any Corps of EPA
Ennineers/Onaha
District
12 04/02/96 U.S. Army Corps of U.S. EPA
Engineers
13 04/05/9i U.S. Arfly Corps of U.S. EPA
Engineers/Oeaha
District
14 04/27/96 Plack, D., U.S. Arsy O'Srady, J., U.S.
Corps of Engineers EPA
Letter Forwarding Attached February 12, 1993 26
Revision to the September 15, 1992 Site
Review and Update
Letter re: U.S. EPA's Request to USACE to 1
Design a Renedial Action for the Arcanui Iron
4 Hetal Site
Letter re: Design of Renedy Listed in 1986 i
R03 Kith an Aiended Action Level for Off Site
Soil Renoval
Predesign Estiiate far the Arcanui Iron 4 ii
Hetal Site
Site Safety and Health Plan for the Arcanui 42
Iron 4 Heta! Site N/Cover Letter
Letter Forwarding Attached Reaediai Design
Scope of Work for the Arcanui Iron 4 Heta!
Site w/Attach«ents
-------
DOCI. DATE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
15 07/22/96 O'Srady, J., U.S. Kleiian, J., U.S.
EPA EPA
16 OB/08/96 Breier, K., U.S. EPA Barber, D., U.S.
EPA/ORC
17 10/26/96 Bertino, JM U.S. File
Ar»y Corps of
Engineers
18 10/29/96 U.S. Army Corps of O'Brady, J., U.S.
Engineers EPA
Heiorandu* re: Classification of Chips froi
Lead Acid Battery Casings n/Attachnents
Heiorandua re: RCRA Regulatory Deteriination
for Plastic Chips froi Lead Acid Battery
Recycling
Heiorandui re: Potential for Excavation tc
Heave at the Arcanui Iron i Metal Site
Cost Estiiates for the Arcanui Iron 4 Metal
Site: (1) Susiary of Estiiated Costs for the
Rapid Response Reioval Action and (2)
Engineer's Estimate for the Phase II Reeoval
Action
14
12
19 11/01/96 OHM Renediation U.S. Any Corps of
Services Corporation Engineers/U.S. EPA
20 12/00/96 U.S. Aray Corps of U.S. EPA
Engineers
21 01/00/97 U.S. EPA/OPA Public
Hork Plan for Renoval of Lead Contaninated 3G3
Soil and Battery Chips at the Arcanui
Superfund Site
Final Ground Mater Saipling Technical 199
Heiorandui for the Arcanui Iron 4 Metal Site
Fact Sheet: "Proposed Plan Sunary for the 8
Arcanun Iron & Metal Site"
22 01/00/97 U.S. EPA
23 01/00/97 HoodNard-Ciyde
Consultants
Public
U.S. Any Corps of
Engineers/U.S. EPA
Fact Sheet: 'Proposed Plan for Record of IB
Decision Aiendient for Final Reiedial Action
at Arcanu* Iron S Metal Superfund Site'
Technical Meiorandui: Risk Assessment for the 99
Arcanui Iron & Metal Site
-------
GUIDANCE ADDENDA TO UPDATE #1 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
ARCANUM IRON & METAL SITE
ARCANUM, OHIO
I. Compendium of CERCLA Response Selection Guidance Documents
II. Guidance Addendum to Update #1 of the Administrative Record
III. U.S. EPA/Region 5 OSWER Directive Compendium
-------
na *o
tVtt/M
1AMVO4I MUOKMOMMci UIU««I
«0 «* MM*
• W4M ibuMiMmiin ana AM
oaumn
•IMIMM
»
OVtl/M • Off
liml
M:
IIIIMAIIIHM III Ml I
IIOOMfAIKMM «MH»l*lllMk 4NI
i NIMIIIIII M IM»*
i MMI
t
Id MM I
MWIMM «l«a»O MIGlli «O» '
•IMIfM • CMMVD
I mtl M
IIMI (I
wllm
i if *M (ins ' m/n/M -.itMin. HI turn
MM I U«l» a MMINM MMtMtf «:INM> Al IMIMMJIIIIIIMMU* •!«•!/•• • •!•«!. Ill . II «
•Mil Wll» • «WO«. 0* /MM
Mil I IMMIIO M94HU MIIIIM« IIM IIMWI II IMMII* BMIMI Ul/al/ll • MIMID. • • «ODMI| MI»«IM»
nil*Mt • KCMMr. I I ,
M*H««IU«M«IMI IIH «UOn« AONM IM/tt/lt
IW unlMMAIMMW •! •UMMiail MMMIIIM M/Ot/l>
nMOwwa* mM(M>i
I OJOKIIMMM4M MMMH A9MM MMIVWOMUNMII* IM«*V«» • KMtM. Ml
tKNMlCMi <• NNODWI HIINC «•»•
I MOHMMNIMMMIMIWIM JCIMMItMK M/nm* • *IIIM. H . I
WU» I •MMIMtMMIMI nUIULMf. MM*HM •>
MM I M «(f V IW1MMDMOTMI ARINM IMM MU
•Ml M IMMMIIWMI IIMIMI (NMMMI •AMMIIWIt Al UMAMMtll
lHMilM:«kll« kill* |*c
-------
rml to I
UMMMt
Hue
Ml «W III It
tltlM PMVt I to
•I/IS - «»nt<*l
' HMl 1HMIS l-ll •tdfMM
i II»A UM* MM wMMfiMi M
wan sins OI/OI/M
niiot a O»/OI/M
I liwl
U*IMM«M« MMMOl IMOUIOT
-MM Mitt
I i
UM1«
am/tr* IUOM*.
M/M/*I
tllll M*l/*t • MUMII. tN .
• M(M. OC Mil
I 0«MM
in.
•*» 4MMNM MIKIM Al IMJNUB «•*!• Milt
mr « MMVD nmuiN* MM
4 ll/fl IHWMMMt
' 4 •!/«• MrWMKMI* IOUXAJ1
wit
MIWI
«INM
TfTirtt
II/II/M
toati. MI
(Oatl. Hi
4 »f|«IM>IUMI-ll«tMI»«l MOtlCI
t »MMUOM«MHM 01(104 •OMMDIM
i «II«IIM» sun •II«I«MIHM muro WMUMM I«NMI«
IMM IMMI II/OI/M • OM
HMl 4| I
IIMl » I
m • i
M I
t
Mml
IIMl
IIMI M t «»•!*» M*«MJ*M»IIIIIH«I>
IIMMIMM W4IMMIMM •KMMIM
tt«M IN f
• .IIMl M» I
I "Ml ' l» I
!••* %*•*« •• .«.|*
>M*M »»»«4 It
•Man »»»>• ii »i
I .•%
il ff<\\ i I
il Mitt •> ••
IWO
II/OI/M
IIMIOMMI
IKMl »»
I iwl IM
-------
•t/IWM
MVl-
Mita*>a«aMi ttntmu
Ul
Mt
IIMt
IMI *C»UOMIfVIBHCII«fl IOIMJ«M« MM
IIO •!/•» •CtlWHIt 41 A III! W
mint BMMI •t/*t/ii> • an IMUI MUUM.* • n*
IMII •|»MNM»I«MKI«*M II IMMOA •KM MCIIMIV IIMWC
' NWMII
MM •tlllO«W»M«:iUiaiCMCaM«WMHnMMMflMOI
•H tint
*I/«I/M • MJIIMOI. C O . 1 1 M /«t*l« Off
• MWI*. N MM
MMI/M • WMNN. Ml . II M MA <»mMMiMnai«*
» HIU»M
-------
•Vtt/M
IHCOMIIVM»IUMItMI->OJI« *MI/M • MIM. O t. • *I«U. I t AMW O llMl IN I . •.•».».. 4 »% .-«
MV. «M MO*
• WDM. « • /t«U
MIMl O •. • «MM. • | A* 0 liml M4 I (r» „.......,,
!!!• •• III! M*O»»UI ttMIMM>Bk«>a«l|. IMOMION BINM IWWW • €••! IMHl
«*0a. »«DBIIIO« MUM* I*. M. 1C. M>
in* nuartojMi » M UMMO t^punyr mmm II/VI/M • CHMV MMC MMHUM OIMI nmi m t
•• •!/•»• ivMnwoMl iKillhr Mdvalair
i
IMO uiiMmaiw«i»«nimiM„ •« to ...»
•»Kll«» »«wt« mm«iimn»«i •HKKJMt* W/IIMI • loatt. n i XHM UMI » t IIMMMVI* MUM tin .«..,„„„. ...
OHIOM*II»I MW«*
IIOTOI MI«OB CIIIO
-------
P«U K> *
•VM/M
III
Ml M4 Mil*
MIKIKX0*0*0 lllll«l|
•It
1UIM MfH IIM MlMlivnl
I ID
M IWMCC* Mil HMMMMNI <*OO»«I
in* •» i MM; oi IMIII MtiNW* JM>MIHM >«CUHII*
MM itnaanuMtiai «ni»a»io« •«u»ia«u
IMC
•*/•!/••
•OMMIWUI
•MM/M • IMMBI. • MM
•t*M/M • CM
tm
ana«iiMii tniM •OIINW •>/•!/«>
IMMI •» |
I mil «•» i
OIMI in I
mil » i
I IIMl « |
•«••>! UU •
IW» It MIMIMM MXIM* •WMDO O IftMOU* Mlt IMVIIII *V«l/»t • «JM*. • I.
raoiia M»«T . CIIMII. ».*.
MM itMniMMMraMMOOMnilMiMlCIIMBAIMMieaillCINM •MI/M.«BU.*«./nnH|tM>t,M, liml M , II ««ini» «•• IIMII..^,,!. ,•
, » meam** o«w»io«
•MMUM. M:
II MC
III! I* HOMCM
ODAWUTIMMOMM* UMB/MI II* M/«I/M • MMWM | a «MM*««>N1IUIMN I I
M*ll *I>II«HI
mi it WIAIMMI or
••*••«
n
»i m/Kin* wsii
•• •«•» MMMJI IMMCM
Ml U«MMI aiKIMM IMIIM I
•*/•!/•»
• *!!•!• II. II M /M«l«|» HUM. Illul 4 |
we.
• IMMWI. •.*•*»
I I
IkW I* » OM>INM» II IIOMIIIUItlMO IM •* •KIMNI 0 IMMIIt Ot/OI/tl
•All*
I Mul «* I
M'* ».*..* •»
-------
na to •
•VM/W
MOTMI MUCIMMOUKMU
M> «0l III It
Mlt
•UIM MfH Ittf
» CH«IM «
it
mic
m IM*RUI men
/« • UIM. • A Aim
• (DO*. I •.*••»
O»/«l/*l • •>*•«. I » . II M
. O* XHII
»nt ii ii > pure M» ii»«irmr ni«nr «ma>mnni «i i«i«m«
suit »o *mt*
HIM) ill I
I (ml 44t I
llntl 110 t
!»• II IP» OMB Nil IMtCIMU IMII
IVtt II OMIMI UIIMM imilKHrM «M«I IKlMMM till!
!•• IIIIMW41 IIIIMM MBUIMIMI •««! l>« «OIMM(lllt
I
i MI . t« i«*4NiR MII KMIKIIM; MMIIIM MMI MC HIM! l» I
04/CI/M . OOMMM. » . ft M MNM1I MMMdl liml ») I
IMII Ull
• CMIMM*. O • ««Ml
0>/OI/«* • COWM. r.. »
-------
MI *O »
iir
M> W>l Mil*
I«U •*•«»
lit*
.,,. ,.~>.....CNO. ••««•*•• VAMUQMHIMUU Mil M «/,.«.
UM*III*-«U*MT MNMMIIM OUMMQ I
lll« IIMVimU wn«I MMMM HUMQ<(*OiaM«W«l«»»M«l IIWI/M • SIM. • C . tl « /M
»l»-«a I MMMfO MOMMOt Ml IM-MM •!«••• • MWIV. M
lit* IIMtnMV M-flMI «l*MMi IWMQM KM OM
,
„„,, „ , „
•
Miwl nt |
HM| ut i
.. ,1.1
III* II «niM*> IDMEiiraMI MMIUtlMNIIMIIMO WAIf COOMIt W*)I'M • MUM. • , tl M ./OttNUMfM O> flMI
nMi
I it iittMiinr umiMwniu in IMAMO* o «i«u» nit M> M/OI/M
IIW II IHAMNI ItilMlOUr «MI» MIIIMMIMS WIMAU1*] «MII •>/•!/•*• I
,lml n
irMH ••»«•» .». i«
!••« \*»*l •• .».t•
M*4/\«if| ••••«•««
l«'ft't«l>* I •• •••!
• ••« \fcl- | fti. tail
KilW l»t»»|.»lnt » nol*/•!/•* • OMi
MU IIAMUrr IMBMHIIW OMMOI
|«l M*M
„
MM M
-------
r«a «o
•VIVI*.
UK
Ht Mil Illlt
OKIAMMMI MIKINMOJKMCI
SMIM PMN IIM
IW» M MOMIll (CM IM1M>-MII IVMUttMM
MM n MU UOIO-MMM •MMIfC HOMO* M<
WMt It
•• JMt
M» n •»* IOWIIIV II •• l«Bk MMMM IfOMCM WO4IMMM1
MMOMt IMM «OIMHkll ODIItOMM MUM
anx> mm i«w
•« M>
M««oiiiAito« a n itt*
itOMDMi MMM m M ••AMIIIMNMII MiMimiWMBUi
M/OI/M . IM
«UM>. o *
•«•!/•* • »•*«•. | M
M/M/M • mid. !•<
m
i iml i i
n«*i n
II KHIMIMI* «*lltMII III Mil***
11*11
MMUMM a «•!! Mt •HAMMI MINU
ii aiiimi* roi «MI'«WA «N«I a
•UU (UMKN* IMMMM tl«l OMUKI IMMMMf
H )IMI MM OMMIMI* WUO-BMfM «MimMe I«MUUNM MMt
UKWCI UUUMM liMOMMV Wl«t«C«l
M/II/CI • vault, i
•t*t't» • IMJAMI* MMMMS. »C
tllll •AMtHI ai/|l/M • IOIIM. | • /OMB
•I/OI/M • OMIMM
iuim. o * nft
m i
IIMl 4 |
n«.i m i
"Ml • I MMMIMMI MMCINMIUW MM I Ml ««>•»! W «ll/ W/M - IMnMHVMOU IMIMMM WMSHH lln.1 M I II MMMMllM MKIM >o-mii* MMMMIIC HOMO* MUMMM OMMKX
tt
•VOI/M
•>/•!/«>
IIMl tM I
. O .*
lt«4M •••••• I
• •Mil *ns» i i
-------
r«u K> t
•VM/M
HtlCllO« M nil*
tul(n ^^ „„
IM It MM IUOM»
|, *!•• lt«»IMUUMM»/«« . a MM ttttMII*. »C
•i xtfaina MN i
«•! II AMIlM* KM CMCMIWBIM MHtMM IIKUUI MO til*. tf/14/M . |M
MI»UMO M. !«•*. » lltVII
Mml IN I
,, ,
-------
no. to
M/M/M.
1AM
MltCIKMOMiMJ
Milt
0*1*
SIMM M(M MM
MM If QMUtMS MM fMOOMI «MISMM) «l
N. •«•». » M04II
MM If OKMtlKI 101 M«J»t HHttltmt 9
OtCltlW.
«•n*) I
WOI If OMIIMS NM M MMBIIIK ASMtMM 0 UUMCM MftMlf
. MO tin. HPIbMI M. HM. ». MOI4I
^IfMMUIKIl •UIUMM UXm»«l IM OCMCM MO 111*1
CAMUi. CMU4 IIMM«(Hia. OtOUWOM. QtODMI.
OlOOOM. OM l««.
(UMINSI. ll«». IMW4. IM««4M l«4> UMVOOOI, «OM«IM»I. KIMM
OTMNI. uruic «». i.i.t .t-nrnxHommmt »-C»OIIN.
I.I.|.I-I|«M«UMOM»I
II MIIIMAMOfllW MOMMINM miM IMIII U OMUIU-OAMU
IIMOItltl MINMINM mil* «MII«|| »«UDII-Mllf«M»IM
CM Mat* II »OiMDt
• III*
HMl .
-------
fml to II
M/li/M
MIICIMMa«o*a
•o MM mi*
SIMM Mot net
tew n iMOMBiaiar 101 MUUMBIIM 9 -MUM* «• •«•«
I.I.I. ••MID
kill II nMICI(M»««i* I¥HAINMD»I«MI WWDI MU'
•oniMnii OD«MM»C M OMMIII M
ton IIMI 9 tojti nucmMMiMi NOCI
«i inMOa "Mil Sllll
•!/•»/«
•*/!*/••
I M/1P*
MMl M
IMin*ll04Ml*OI llMl
Mil II thMMOO OMBJH MMI»*« MMM
«ei« it
»oi» ii mucaoa* iiMHfk '
KM* II IMkMI*MNI «Mf«MM OMMfl IMCOMMf MlttWMl
«•<•!/» • *••* i * . «i M /mciitr. •€••«•» fiMl
I<«UUKMV
• «Miai. •! /aarvnii* •*>HKNMM«
•IMMOIIW
••/•I/M-OHI nn.1
>M«i/M -OM llml
M/OI/tt • (Iff MltM. MC
• nvuraii. 11
II/II/M • Cdll«. I • 4
i
i»«n IM i
Mml n i
Nl
W/M
• I
WMI/W • |M AUOUMICOMIIII
••I II WMWM CWI WNCIMM MMM
I MOTMMttMMMMI MB MMMM «9l(M I
"MI M i
IIMI l» I
IIMI • i
IAMII «VH« u •>•
MMl i> •>«
l» MUlliMI
MOO » COMXrTIIIAIMM MM<«WUO: A IMBUX <«•«!• VM1NMI Ok/OI/M
IIMI IM i now 4 n MUM mi imiim .M.M »,.. u,..,
IIMVM
-------
r«n »o ii
OV !»/•»
••NW-
AIIMMI UIICIMMUINMNI IU1MM1
IU
Ml Mil Hilt
lUiut p«tn llti
•• . latanml
M
it iM«Mi
MMtOIIM MM1IICAIKM
n/ti/tt • «OIIM. | • ,
KHIM. i • <
llnil.
IIMl
IUMIS
«U»I II •UMMIMIAIIUtMM •«• O4MMI* MllCIMM
I
II/H/M • HHIIH. | •
I iittl M |
MbMtl. «Mt Mml I |
* fAM ri !'•'• •• • •
-------
GUIDANCE ADDENDUM TO UPDATE #1
DOCUMENTS MAY BE VIEWED AT
U.S. EPA REGION 5
77 W. JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, IL 6O6O4-3590
O2/11/97
DOCI DflTE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
1 00/00/00 Chaney, R., USDA; et
al.
2 00/00/00 Lutz, P., et al.
3 00/00/00 Angle, C.
4 00/00/00 Various
5 00/00/00 Bornschein, R., et
al.
6 00/00/00 Watt, T., et al.
7 00/00/00
8 00/00/00 fladdaioni, M., et
al.
9 00/00/00 Bornschein, R.
10 00/00/00 Rock, S., U.S. U.S. EPA
EPA/NRNRL
'The Potential for Heavy Metal Exposure From 46
Urban Gardens and Soils' (USDA/Agricultural
Research Service)
Abstract: 'Immunity in Children Hith Exposure 21
to Environtental Lead: I. Effects on Cell
Nuibers and Cell-Mediated Immunity' (DRAFT)
Abstract: 'Kinetics of Childhood Lead: The 5
Diana Duplicate Diet Study'
Abstracts From 'Medicine/Lead" (Listing of 10
Lead Studies)
Article: 'Soil Lead Blood Lead Relationship 12
in a Former Lead (lining TOND'
Excerpt from Journal Article: 'Lead 1
Contamination of U.K. Dusts and Soils and
[•plications for Childhood Exposure: An
Overview of the Work of the Environmental
Geocheeistry Research Group* (Imperial
College of London)
Excerpt: "Lead and Conpounds* (Integrated 10
Risk Information System)
Paper: "Bioavailability of Soil Borne Lead in 17
Adults by Stable Isotope Dilution"
Paper: "Neurobehavioral Effect of Lead: A 15
Summary Revieo of Cross Sectional and
Longitudinal Studies'
Paper: 'Phytoreaediation" 11
11 00/00/00 National Acadeiy of
Sciences
12 00/00/00 iiSDC/NOAA
Publication: 'Measuring Lead Exposure in
Infants, Children, and Other Sensitive
Populations' (National Acadeay Press)
Technical fleuoranduii: "The Potential for
Biological Effects of Sediment Sorbed
Contaminants Tested in the National Status
and Trends Program' (NOS ONA 52)
235
-------
DOCI DATE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
13 00/0091 Mushak, P.
14 OS/00/61 Kehoe, R.
15 05/00/74 Rosen, J., et al.
16 00/00/75 Barry, P.
17 01/00/76 Barry, P.
18 00/00/77 Barry, P., et al.
19 08/00/77 Yankel, A., et al.
20 08/00/77 Daistra, T.
21 00/00/78 Ziegler, E., et al.
22 00/00/79 Barltrop, D., et al.
23 00/00/80 Keller, C. and R.
Doherty
24 04/00/80 Needleian, H.
Monograph: "Castro-Intestinal Absorption of 17
Lead in Children and Adults: Overview of
Biological Biophysicocheiical Aspects
(Cheiical Species and Bioavailabilityi
Lecture: "The Metabolism of Lead in Han in 21
Health and Disease" (Harbin Lectures: I960)
Journal Article: "Significance of Plasia Lead 6
Levels in Normal and Lead Intoxicated
Children (Environmental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'A Comparison of 22
Concentrations of Lead in Huian Tissues'
(British Journal of Industrial Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Complete Set of Data in 35
Support of "A Comparison of Concentrations of
Lead in Hunan Tissues'" (British Journal of
Industrial Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Lead Concentrations in 13
Huian Tissues' (British Journal of Industrial
Medicine)
Journal Article: "The Silver Valley Lead 5
Study: The Relationship Between Childhood
Blood Lead Levels and Environmental Exposure
(Journal of the Air Pollution Control
Association)
Journal Article: "Toxicological Properties of 11
Lead' (Environnental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'Absorption and Retention of 6
Lead by Infants' (Pediat. Res.)
Journal Article: "Effect of Particle Si:e on 5
Lead Absorption" (Arch. Environ. Health)
Journal Article: °Bone Lead Mobilization in 9
Lactating Mice and Lead Transfer to Suckling
Offspring" (Toxicology and Applied
Phamacology)
Journal Article: "Lead Exposure and Huian 4
Health: Recent Data on an Ancient Problem
(Technology Review)
-------
DOCI . DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
25 00/00/81 Barry, P.
26 00/00/81 Barry, P.
27 00/00/81 Needletan, H., et
al.
28 00/00/82 Needleian, H.
29 00/00/92 Stark, A., et al.
30 09/02/82 Hahaffey, K., et al.
31 12/00/82 Freedberg, L.
32 00/00/83 Kneip, T., et al.
33 00/00/83 Needleaan, H.
34 09/00/83 Ryu, J., et al.
35 12/00/83 Hielke, H., et al.
34 12/00/83 Hahaffey, K.
Journal Article: 'Additional Set of Data in 8
Support of 'Concentrations Of Lead in the
Tissue of Children1' (British Journal of
Industrial Medicine)
Journal Article: "Concentrations of Lead in 11
the Tissues of Children* (British Journal of
Industrial Medicine)
Journal Article: 'The Health Effects of LON 20
Level Exposure to Lead* (Annual Review of
Public Health)
Journal Article: 'The Neurofaehavioral 4
Consequences of LON Lead Exposure in
Childhood" (Neurobehavioral Toxicology and
Teratology)
Journal Article: 'The Relationship of 12
Environcental Lead to Blood Lead Levels in
Children (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: 'National Estinates of Blood 7
Lead Levels: United States, 1976-1980' (New
England Journal of Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Lead Laden Freeway Parks 4
Hazardous to Kids' (Neighborhood Works)
Journal Article: "Biokinetic Modeling for 3
Hawaiian Lead Metabolise' (Neurotoxicology)
Journal Article: 'Lead at Low Dose and the 12
Behavior of Children* (Acta Psychiat. Scand.)
Journal Article: 'Dietary Intake of Lead and &
Blood Lead Concentration in Early Infancy*
(Ai J Dis Child)
Journal Article: 'Lead Concentrations in 4
Inner City Soils as a Factor in the Child
Lead Probleo* (Aaerican Journal of Public
Health)
Journal Article: 'Sources of Lead in the 1
Urban Environsent* {Aierican Journal of
Public Health)
-------
DOCf DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
37 00/00/04 Angle, C., et al.
38 00/00/84 Brunekreef, 8.
39 00/00/84 RabinoNitz, H., et
al.
40 06/08/84 Needleaan, et al.
41 09/00/84 U.S. EPA
42 00/00/85 Clark, C.
43 00/00/85 Quettee, S., et al.
44 00/00/85 Narcus, A.
45 00/00/85 Schroeder, S.
4i 00/00/85 Bornschein, R., et
al.
47 00/00/85 Bornschein, R., et
al.
48 01/00/65 Centers for Disease
Control
Journal Article: "Ocaha Childhood Blood Lead 10
and "Environmental Lead: A Linear Total
Exposure Model" {Environmental Research)
Journal Article: "The Relationship Between 44
Air Lead and Blood Lead in Children: A
Critical Review' (Sci. Total Environ.)
Journal Article: 'Variability of Blood Lead 3
Concentrations During Infancy' (Arch.
Environ. Health)
Journal Article: 'The Relationship Between 4
Prenatal Exposure to Lead and Congenital
Anomalies" (Journal of the American Medical
Association)
Health Effects Assessment for Lead 45
Journal Article: "Condition and Type of 5
Housing as an Indicator of Potential
Environmental Lead Exposure and Pediatric
Blood Lead Levels" (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: 'Evolution of Efficient 10
Methods to Saiple Lead Sources, Such as House
and Hand Dust, in the Homes of Children*
(Environiental Research)
Journal Article: 'Nulticompartment Kinetic IB
Models for Lead: I. Bone Diffusion Models for
Long Ten Retention' (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: "Separating the Effects of 11
Lead and Social Factors on IQ* (Environiental
Research)
Journal Article: 'The Cincinnati Prospective 14
Study of Low Level Lead Exposure and Its
Effects of Child Development: Protocol and
Status Report' (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: "The Influence of Social and 10
Environmental Factors on Dust Lead, Hand
Lead, and Blood Lead Levels in Young
Children* (Environmental Research)
Statement: "Preventing Lead Poisoning in 82
Young Children'
-------
DOC» -DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
49 04/00/85 RabinoNit:, et al.
Journal Article: "Hoie Refinishing, Lead
Paint, and Infant Blood Lead Levels'
(American Journal of Public Health)
50 10/00/85 RabinoHitz, M., et
al.
Journal Article: "Lead in Milk and Infant
Blood: A Dose Response Model' (Archives of
Environeental Health)
51 00/00/84 U.S. EPA
Air Quality Criteria for Lead: Volumes 2, 3,
and 4
52 00/00/86 Koh, T., et al.
53 00/00/86 Craswell, P., et al.
54 00/00/86 Bornschein, R., et
al.
55 00/00/86 Bellinger, et al.
56 00/00/86 Rabinowitz, «., et
al.
57 05/00/86 Hanir, A., et al.
53 06/00/86 Bornschein, et al.
59 06/06/86 Bellinger, D., et
al.
40 00/00/87 Bornschein, R., et
al.
Journal Article: 'A Coiparison of Blood 3
Levels in Dogs from Lead Mining, Lead
Smelting, Urban, and Rural Island Environaent
(Aust. Vet. J.)
Journal Article: 'Chronic Lead Nephropathy in 7
Queensland: Alternative Methods of Diagnosis'
(Australian/New Zealand Journal of Medicine)
Journal Article: "Exterior Surface Dust Lead, 0
Interior House Dust Lead, and Childhood Lead
Exposure in an Urban Environment'
(Environmental Health)
Journal Article: "Low Level Lead Exposure and 11
Infant Development in the First Year"
(Neurobehavioral Toxicology and Teratology)
Journal Article: "Occurrence of Elevated 5
Protoporphyr Levels in Relation to Lead
Burden in Infants' (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: 'Time Required for Elevated 2
Blood Lead Concentrations to Return to Normal
in Dogs' (Australian Veterinary Journal)
Paper: 'Exterior Surface Dust Lead, Interior 13
Dust Lead and Childhood Lead Exposure in an
Urban Environment' (Trace Metals in
Environment Health Conference)
Journal Article: 'Correlates of LON Level 8
Lead Exposure in Urban Children at 2 Years of
Age" (Pediatrics)
Journal Article: 'Exterior Surface Dust Lead, 10
Interior House Dust Lead, and Childhood Lead
Exposure in an Urban Environment" (Environ.
Health)
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
=========
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
=================
PA8ES
61 00/00/87 Needlenan, H.
62 00/00/87 Schutz, A., et al.
»3 00/00/87 Needlecan, H.
64 00/00/87 Hoffer, BM et al.
65 03/05/87 Minnesota Departaent
of Health
Journal Article: 'Introduction: Biomarkers in 4
Neurodevelopmentai Toxicology" (Environmental
Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: "Kinetics of Lead in Blood 10
After the End of Occupational Exposure*
(Scand J Hork Environ Health)
Journal Article: "Low Level Lead Exposure in 5
the Fetus and Young Child" (Neurotoxicology)
Journal Article: 'Toxic Effects of Lead in 7
the Developing Nervous System: In
Oculoexperimental Models' {Environmental
Health Perspectives)
Memorandum Transiting Report to Minnesota 100
Legislature: "Lead Exposure and Health
Effects of Children"
66 04/23/87 Bellinger, D., et
al.
Journal Article: "Longitudinal Analyses of
Prenatal and Postnatal Lead Exposure and
Early Cognitive Development" (New England
Journal of Medicine)
67 05/00/87 U.S. EPA
Review and RecoMendations on a Lead in Soil
Guideline
109
68 05/30/87 Fulton, et al.
69 00/00/88 Fergusson, D., et
al.
70 00/00/88 Brockhaus, A., et
al.
71 00/00/88 Silbergeld, E.
Journal Article: "Influence of Blood Lead on 6
the Ability and Attainment of Children in
Edinburgh" (The Lancet)
Journal Article: "A Longitudinal Study of 16
Dentine Lead Levels, Intelligence, School
Performance, and Behavior- Part II: Dentine
Lead and Cognitive Ability* (J. Child
Psychol. Psychiatr.)
Journal Article: "Exposure to Lead and 12
Cadiiui of Children Living in Different Areas
of North West Germany: Results of Biological
Monitoring Studies 1982-1986" (Occupational
Environmental Health)
Journal Article: "Lead and Osteoporosis: 13
Mobilization of Lead froti Bone in
Postmenopausal Women" (Environmental
Research)
-------
BOH .DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
72 00/00/88 Silbergeld, E., et
al.
73 00/00/09 Higg, et al.
74 00/00/88 HcHichael, A., et
al.
75 00/00/88 Nriagu, J.f et al.
76 00/00/86 Rosen, J.
77 03/07/88 flielke, H.
78 03/09/88 Marcus, A., et al.
79 05/00/88 U.S. EPA
80 07/00/88 ATSDR/Public Health
Service/USDHHS
81 08/25/88 HcNichael, et al.
82 12/00/88 Hittmers, L., et al.
Journal Article: "Lead and Osteoporosis: 2
Mobilization of Lead from Bone in
Postsenopausal Nonen* (Environmental
Research)
Journal Article: 'Port Pirie Cohort Study: 7
Childhood Blood Lead and Neuropsychological
Development at Age TNO Years' (Journal of
Epideiiology and Community Health)
Journal Article: "Port Pirie Cohort Study: 7
Environmental Exposure to Lead and Children's
Abilities at the Age of Four Years' (Net-
England Journal of Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Quantitative Assessment of 5
Worldwide Contaiination of Air, Hater and
Soils by Trace Metals' (Nature)
Publication Excerpt: 'The Toxicological 10
Iiportance of Lead in Bone: The Evolution and
Potential Uses of Bone Lead Measurements by X-
Ray Fluorescence to Evaluate Treatment
Outcoies in Moderately Lead ToxicChildren"
(Biol. Monitoring of Toxic Metal)
Paper: 'Lead in Soil: Issues and Guidelines' 10
(Proceedings of Chapel Hill, NC Conference!
Paper: 'Modeling the Blood Lead Soil Lead 14
Relationship* (Proceedings: Environmental
Beochmestry and Health)
Fact Sheet: 'Drinking Hater and Lead* 6
Nature and Extent of Lead Poisoning in 561
Children in the United States; A Report to
Congress
Journal Article: 'Port Pirie Cohort Study: 8
Environment Exposure to Lead and Children's
Abilities at the Age of Four Years' |Nen
England Journal of Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Lead in Bone: IV. 11
Distribution of Lead in the Human Skeleton*
(Archives of Environmental Health)
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
33 00/00/89 Hansen, 0., et ai.
84 00/00/89 Thompson, 6., et al.
85 00/00/89 RabinoKitz, «., et
al.
86 00/00/89 Hadhavan, S., et al.
87 00/00/89 Hatzakis, A., et al.
00/00/89 Hushak, P.
89 00/00/89 Grant, L., et al.
90 00/00/89 Dietrich, 1C., et al.
91 00/00/89 Dietrich, K., et al.
92 00/00/89 Nushak, P., et al.
Journal Article: "A Neurcpsychological Study G
of Children With Elevated Dentine Lead Level:
Assessment of the Effects of Lead in
Different Socio-Economic Groups*
(Neurotoxicol. Teratol.)
Journal Article: 'Blood Lead Levels and 13
Children's Behavior: Results from the
Edinburgh Lead Study* (J. Child psychol.
Psychiatr.)
Journal Article: "Blood Lead-Tooth Lead 4
Relationship Among Boston Children" (Bulletin
of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology)
Journal Article: 'Lead in Soil: Recoiaended 7
Naxinui Permissible Levels* (Environmental
Research)
Publication Excerpt: "12 Psychometric 12
Intelligence Deficits in Lead Exposed
Children* (Lead Exposure and Child
Development)
Publication Excerpt: 'Biological Monitoring 16
of Lead Exposure in Children: Overview of
Selected Biokinetic and Toxicological Issues'
(Lead Exposure and Child Development)
Publication Excerpt: 'Effects of LOK Level 66
Lead Exposure on Pediatric Neurobehaviora!
Development: An International Assessment'
(Lead Expesure and Child Development)
Publication Excerpt: "Neurobehavioral Effects 7
of Fetal Lead Exposure: The First Year of
Life' (1989: Lead Exposure and Child
Development; Smith, H., et al; eds.)
Publication Excerpt: 'Neurobehavioral Effects 11
of Fetal Lead Exposure: The First Year of
Life' (Lead Exposure and Child Development)
Report: "Determination of Numbers of Lead 19
Exposed American Children as a Function of
Lead Source* (Report to U.S. Congress on
Childhood Lead Poisoning)
-------
DOC! • DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
93 00/00/89 dushak, P., et al.
94 01/00/89 Rosen, J., et. al.
95 05/30/89 U.S. EPA/OERR
U.S. EPA
96 09/07/89 U.S. EPA/OERR/OHPE U.S. EPA
97 10/00/89 U.S. EPA
98 10/23/89 Niddaugh, J., et al.
99 00/00/90 Graziano, J., et al.
100 00/00/90 Dietrich, K., et al.
101 00/00/90 Hinneke, 6., et al.
102 00/00/90 Goyer, R.
103 01/11/90 Needleian, et al.
Report: 'Prenatal and Postnatal Effects of 25
LOH Level Lead Exposure (Report to U.S.
Congress on Childhood Lead Poisoning)
Journal Article: "L-Line X-Ray Fluorescence 5
of Cortical Bone Lead Compound with the
CaNa2EDTA Test in Lead Toxic Children: Public
Health Implications' (Environmental Health)
Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund 197
Documents: The Proposed Plan, Record of
Decision, Explanation of Significant
Differences, Record of Decision Amendment
(OSWER Directive 19355.3-02)
Memorandum re: Interii Guidance on
Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at
Superfund Sites IOSKER Directive 19355.4-02)
Technical Support Document on Lead
Health Hazard and Risk Assessment From
Exposure to Heavy Metals in Ore in Skagway,
Alaska, Final Report
Journal Article: 'Determinants of Elevated
Blood Lead During Pregnancy in a Population
Surrounding a Lead Smelter in Kosovo,
Yugoslavia' (Environmental Health
Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'Lead Exposure and
Neurobehavioral Development in Later Infancy"
(Environmental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: "Results from the European
Hulticenter Study on Lead Neuratoxicity in
Children: Implications for Risk Assessment*
(Neurotoxiccl. Teratol.)
Journal Article: 'Transplacental Transport of
Lead' (Environmental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: "The Long Term Effects of
Exposure to LOM Doses of Lead in Children0
(Ne« England Journal of Medicine)
3
78
20
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
104 01/26/90 U.S. EPA/OERR U.S. EPA
105 02/01/90 Chaney, R., USDA
104 05/07/90 U.S. EPA/OSNER U.S. EPA
107 08/28/90 U.S. EPA/OSUER U.S. EPA
108 09/00/90 U.S. EPA/OERR/ORD U.S. EPA
109 09/00/90 U.S. EPA/OSHER U.S. EPA
110 09/27/90 (lushak, P.
Ill 11/00/90 Harcus, A., et al.
112 00/00/91 Hahaffey, K.
113 00/00/91 Nilsson, U., et al.
114 00/00/91 Rosen, J., et al.
Memorandum re: Supplement to Interii Guidance 2
on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at
Superfund Sites (9SHER Directive 19355.4-02A)
'Acidity of Stoeach Secretions in Huians, 11
Rats, and Pigs, and the Potential Importance
of Stomach Ph in Bioavailability of Ph in
Soil Sand Mine Hastes'
Memorandum re: Interii Guidance on 2
Establishing Sail Lead Cleanup Levels at RCRA
Facilities
Performance of Risk Assessment in RI/FS 0
Studies Conducted by PRPs (QSHER Directive
9835.15)
Engineering Bulletin: Soil Hashing Treatment 10
(EPA/540/2-90/017)
Quick Reference Fact Sheet: 'Superfund LDR &
Guide I6A (2nd Edition): Obtaining a Soil and
Debris Treatabiiity Variance for Remedial
Actions" (Superfund Publication 9347.3-06FS)
Paper: 'Gastro Intestinal Absorption of Lead 37
in Children and Adults: Overview of
Biological ana* Bicphysico Chemical Aspects"
(Symposium on the Bioavailability and Dietary
Exposure of Lead)
Paper: "Inter Site Comparisons of 82
Environmental Lead Uptake" (Symposium on
Bioavailability)
Journal Article: "Biokinetics of Lead During 2
Pregnancy' (Fundamental and Applied
Toxicology)
Journal Article: 'Kinetics of Lead in Bone 7
and Blood after the End of Occupational
Exposure' (Pharaacol. Toxicol.)
Journal Article: "Sequential Measurements of &
Bone Lead Content by L I-Ray Fluorescence in
CaNa2 EDTA Treated Lead Toxic Children
(Environmental Health Perspectives)
10
-------
DOCI • DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
115 00/00/91 Rabinowitz, M.
Hi 00/00/91 Bellinger, D., et
al.
117 00/00/91 Centers for Diseases
Control/U.S. Public
Health Service
118 02/00/91 U.S. EPA/OSHER U.S. EPA
119 02/21/91 Reilly, N., U.S. EPA
120 02/26/91 OPTS/U.S. EPA
121 06/00/91 Hu, H.
122 07/02/91 U.S. EPA/OSWER U.S. EPA
123 OB/29/91 OSHER/U.S. EPA
124 08/29/91 U.S. EPA/OSMER U.S. EPA
125 09/00/91 U.S. EPA/OERR
126 10/00/91 Centers for Desease
Control/U.S. Public
Health Service
127 10/03/91 U.S. EPA
128 11/04/91 Royer, H., U.S. EPA;
et al.
U.S. EPA
Journal Article: "Toxicokinetics of Bone
Lead* (Environrentai Health Perspectivesl
Journal Article: 'Height Gain and Maturity in
Fetuses Exposed to LOH Levels of Lead"
(Environmental Research)
Pamphlet: "Important Facts About Childhood
Lead Poisoning Prevention*
Figures froa Guidance Document: 'Land 3
Disposal Restrictions: Summary of
Requirements' (OSKER Directive 9934.0-1A)
Testiiony of the Adiinistrator/U.S. EPA 24
Before the Conittee on Environment and
Public Works, U.S. Senate
Memorandum re: Final Agency Lead Strategy 44
Journal Article: 'A 50 Year Follow up of 7
Childhood Plumbism' (AJDC)
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk C
Assessments in RI/FS Studies Conducted by
PRPs (OSNER Directive 9835.15a)
Memorandum re: Update on D5UER Soil Lead 4
Cleanup Guidance
Memorandum re: Update on Soil Lead Cleanup 4
Guidance
Guidance for Conducting Treatability Studies 45
Under CERCLA: Soil Hashing, Interim Guidance
(EPA/540/2-91/020A)
Statement: "Preventing Lead Poisoning in 118
Young Children*
Report: Analysis of Lead in Soil and Oust
Data
85
Paper: 'Control Technologies for Defunct Lead 23
Battery Recycling Sites; Overview and Recent
Developments' (Third International Seminar on
Battery Waste Management)
11
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PA6ES
129 12/00/91 U.S. EFA/OERR
U.S. EPA
130 12/13/91 U.S. EPA/OSHER U.S. EPA
131 00/00/92 Beck, 6.
132 00/00/92 Baghurst, P., et al.
133 00/00/92 American Acadeay of
Pediatrics
134 00/00/92 Bellinger, D., et
al.
135 00/00/92 Freetan, 6., et al.
136 08/00/92 Lead Detection and
Abateient Report
137 08/03/92 Rothenberg, S., et
al.
138 08/04/92 Marcus, A.
13? 09/00/92 U.S. EPA/OERR
U.S. EPA
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: 64
Voluae 1^Hunan Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B-Developnent of Risk Based
Preliminary Reaediation Goals) [INTERIM]
(Publication 9285.7-018)
Heiorandui Forwarding Attached Interii Risk 66
Assesstent Guidance: Volute 1- Hutan Health
Evaluation Manual (Part B: 'Development of
Risk Based, Preliminary Retediation Goals')
[OSKER Directive I92B5.7-01B)
Journal Article: 'An Update on Exposure and 8
Effects of Lead' (Fundamental and Applied
Toxicology)
Journal Article: "Environmental Exposure to 5
Lead and Children's Intelligence at the Age
of Seven Years' (New England Journal of
Medicine)
Journal Article: "Lead Poisoning: Froa 7
Screening to Primary Prevention* (Pediatrics)
Journal Article: 'Lou Level Lead Exposure, 6
Intelligence, and Acadetic Achievetent: A
Long Tert Follow-Up Study* (Pediatr.)
Journal Article: "Relative Bioavailability of 11
Lead fro* Mining Haste Soil in Rats'
(Fundamental and Applied Toxicology)
Article: "Nen York State Legislature Passes 1
Bill Requiring Lead Screening for Young
Children, Pregnant Noien*
Paper: "Simple Modeling of Maternal Lead 14
Levels During Pregnancy: The Role of
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors*
(International Conference on Lead and Other
Trace Substances)
Presentation: "Coaparative Approaches to 23
Superfund Site Assesstents for Young Children
Exposed to Lead* (Proceedings: Environtental
Geochemistry and Health)
Engineering Bulletin: 'Selection of Control 19
Technologies for Reeediation of Lead Battery
Recycling Sites" (EPA/540/S-92/011)
12
-------
DOCI ' DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
140 10/00/92 U.S. EPA/OERR/QRD U.S. EPA
141 11/00/92 Hassenan, 6., et
al.
142 00/00/93 O'Flaherty, E.
143 00/00/93 Dietrich, K., et al.
144 00/00/93 Leggett, R., et al.
145 00/00/93 National Research
Council
146 04/00/93 USDHHS
147 04.07/93 Ruff, H., et al.
148 05/00/93 U.S. EPA/QERR/ORD U.S. EPA
149 07/00/93 OERR/U.S. EPA
L50 07/00/93 OERR/U.S. EPA
Engineering Bulletin: 'Slurry Halls' E
(EPA/540/S-92/008)
Journal Article: 'Independent Effects of Lead 10
Exposure and Iron Deficiency Aneeia on
Developmental Outcoae at Age 2 Years'
(Journal of Pediatrics)
Journal Article: 'Physiologically Based 14
Models for Bone Seeking Elements: IV.
Kinetics of Lead Disposition in Huians'
(Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology)
Journal Article: 'The Developmental 7
Consequences of LON to Moderate Prenatal and
Postnatal Lead Exposure: Intellectual
Attainment in the Cincinnati Lead Study
Cohort Following School Entry* (Neurotoxicol.
Teratol.)
Paper: 'An Elementary Method for Implementing 13
Complex Biokinetic Models" (Health Physics
Society)
Report: 'Measuring Lead Exposure in Infants, 178
Children, and Other Sensitive Populations'
(1993j National Academy Press)
Toxicological Profile for Lead 0
Journal Article: 'Declining Blood Lead Levels 6
and Cognitive Changes in Moderately Lead
Poisoned Children* (Journal of the American
Medical Association)
Engineering Bulletin: 'Solidification 13
Stabilization of Organics and Inorganics
(EPA/540/S-92/015)
Urban Soil Lead Abatement Demonstration 193
Project Volume 1: Integrated Report [Revien
Draft] (EPA/600/AP-93/001a)
Urban Soil Lead Abatement Demonstration 756
Project Volume 2: Boston Report
(EPA/600/AP-93/001b)
13
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT
151 07/00/93 OERR/U.S. EPA
152 07/00/93 OERR/U.S. EPA
153 OB/00/93 Queneau, P. and A.
Troutaan
154 08/00/93 Canadian Ministry of
Environment and
Energy
155 09/01/93 U.S. EPA/DSHER U.S. EPA
156 12/00/93 Leggett, R.
157 00/00/94 Harcus, A., et al.
158 02/00/94 OERR/U.S. EPA
159 03/00/94 Adler, J.
140 03/09/94 Stipp, D.
161 03/23/94 OSHER/U.S. EPA
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
162 03/23/94 U.S. EPA/OERR
U.S. EPA
Urban Soil Lead Abatement Deaonstration
Project Voluae 3: Bjltiaore Report
(EPA/600/AP-93/001ci
Urban Soil Lead Abateaent Demonstration
Project Volume 4: Cincinnati Report
(EPA/600/AP-93/001d)
Publication: "Guidelines for the Protection
and Management of Aquatic Sediaent Quality in
Ontario1 «/Attachients (ISBN 0-7729-9248-7)
PAGES
548
272
Journal Article: 'Waste Minimization Charges 4
Up Recycling of Spend Lead Acid Batteries"
(Haziat World)
123
New Policy on Performance on Risk Assessments 0
During RI/F5 Conducted by PRPs (OSHER
Directive 9835.15b)
Journal Article: 'An Age Specific Kinetic 19
Model of Lead Metabolism in Humans'
(Environmental Health Perspectives)
Publication Excerpt: "Estimating the 12
Contribution of Lead Based Paint to Soil
Lead, Dust Lead, and Childhood Blood Lead
(Lead in Paint, Soil, and Dust)
Guidance Manual for the integrated Exposure 256
Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children
(Publication 9285.7-15-1, EPA/540/R-93/081)
Journal Article: "Setting the Lead Out" 2
(Garbage)
Journal Article: 'Probe Finds Errors, But Na 1
Misconduct, in Hark by Lead Poisoning* (Nail
Street Journal)
Memorandum re: Transaittal of Guidance Manual 2
for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic
Node! for Lead in Children and IEUBK Model,
Version 0/99d
Memorandum re: Transiitta! of Guidance Manual 2
for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic
Model for Lead in Children and IEUBK Model,
Version 0.99d
14
-------
DOCI ' DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPT1DN
PAGES
163 04/00/94 Rabinoaitz, H.( et
164 06/00/94 ATSDR/U.S. Public
Health Service
165 06/03/94 von Lindern, I., et
al.
166 07/14/94 OSHER/U.S. EPA
167 07/15/94 OPPTS/U.S. EPA
Journal Article: "Variability of Blood Lead 4
Concentrations During Infancy" (Archives of
Environaental Health)
Report: 'Hultisite Lead and Cadniui Exposure 256
Study Nith Biological Markers Incorporated*
(DRAFT)
Paper: 'Reducing Children's Blood Lead Levels 23
at the Bunker Hill Superfund-Site in Northern
Idaho, USA Through Health Intervention and
Soil/Dust Source Control Measures' (1994
International Lead Abatement Remediation
Conference)
Hetorandui re: Revised Interii Soil Lead 25
Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective
Action Facilities (OSHER Directive
19355.4-12)
Memorandum re: Guidance an Residential Lead 32
Based Paint, Lead Contaminated Dust, and Lead
Contaiinated Soil
168 07/27/94 Goldman, L.
169 07/27/94 Brody, D., et al.
170 07/27/94 Pirkle, J., et al.
171 00/00/95 O'Flaherty, E.
172 04/00/95 Roy F. Weston, Inc. U.S. EPA
Editorial: "Childhood Lead Poisoning in 1994*
(Journal of the American Medical Association)
Journal Article: 'Blood Lead Levels in the
U.S. Population' [Phase 1 of the Third
National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey] (Journal of the American Medical
Association)
Journal Article: 'The Decline of Blood Lead
Levels in the United States* [The National
Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys]
(Journal of the Aierican Medical Association)
Journal Article: 'Physiologically Based
Models for Bone Seeking Eleeents: V. Lead
Absorption and Disposition in Childhood*
(Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology)
Baseline Human Health Risk Assessient for the
California Gulch Superfund Site: Part C
(Eyaluation of Worker Scenario) [DRAFT]
12
57
15
-------
DOCI DATE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
173 00/00/96 Gulson, B., et al.
174 04/17/96 Kit, R., et al.
175 04/17/96 Hu, H., et al.
176 04/17/96 Brady, D., Net* York Public
Tiies
177 10/00/96 U.S. EPA/OSNER U.S. EPA
178 12/00/96 U.S. EPA/Technical U.S. EPfl
Review Workgroup for
Lead
179 12/00/96 U.S. EPA/TRHL
U.S. EPA
Journal Article: "lapact of Blood Lead in
Children and Adults Pollening Relocation froi
Their Source of Exposure and Contribution of
Skeletal Tissue to Blood Lead1 (Bull.
Environ. Contaa. Toxicol.)
Journal Article: 'A Longitudinal Study of LOM
Level Lead Exposure and lipairtent of Renal
Function: The Noriative Aging Study (Journal
of the American Medical Association]
Journal Article: "The Relationship of Bone
and Blood Lead to Hypertension: The Hortative
Aging Study' (Journal of the American Medical
Association)
Newspaper Article: 'Unexpected Dangers Found
in LON Levels of Lead"
Recent Developments for In Situ Treatment of
Hetal Contaainated Soils (EPA-542-R-96
Oil] [DRAFT]
Report: 'Recouendations of the Technical
Review Workgroup for Lead for an Interia
Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with
Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil*
Report: Reconaendations of the Technical
Review Workgroup for Lead for an Interim
Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with
Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil
80
40
43
16
-------
U.S. EPA/RWION 5
OSWER DIRECTIVE COMPENDIUM
ARCANUM IRON & METAL SITE
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD—UPDATE
CIRCLED ITEMS ARE
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
OSWER DIRECTIVE CLASSIFICATION
November 1996
PROGRAM
NUMBER
Administrative (AAOSWER)
CSuperfund (OERR)
(RCRA (OSHT)
• •
Underground Storage Tanks (OUST)
(Superfund Enforcement (OWPEf)
RCRA Enforcement (OWE)
9000 - 9199
CS200 - 939J)
9600 - 9799
\JHWO - 9899^)
9900 - 9999
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OSWER IMMEDIATE OFFICE
9010- Policy
9011 • Organization and Function*
9012- Delegations of Authority
9019- Administrative Managamtnt
9016- Public Affairs
9016- Interagency Activities
9018- U/C
9019 • Contracts Management
9021 - Library Systems
9022 - Publications and Communications Material
9023 - Printing and Distribution
9024- Budget Administration
9026- Travel and Transportation
9028- Data Processing Systems
9037- Program Review and Reporting
9061- Telecommunications
9062- Office Services
9053 - Research and Development
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE
-------
9200- Administrative Procedures
9220- Celling Increases
9221- CERCLIS
9223 • Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program
9225- Claims
9230- Community Relations
9234- Compliance
9240- Contract Lab Program
9242- Contracts
9246- Cooperative Agreements
9250> Cost-Sharing
9260- Delegations
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL RESPONSE ICont\
9266- Docket
9270- Feasibility Studies
9272- Federal Facilities
9276- Financial Management
9280- Flood Plains/Wetlands
9282- Freedom of Information
9283 - Ground Water Contamination
9295 - Health and Safety Guidance
9318 - National Environmental Policy Act
9320- National Priorities List
932S- Notifications
9330- Off-Site Policy
9340- Potentially Responsible Parties
9348- Preremedlal Investigations
9347- RCRA/CERCLA Guidance
9350- Remedial Investigations
9360- Removal Procedures
9375- State Participation
9380- Technologies
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
9400 - General OSW Policy and Procedures
9420 - RCRA Implementation Plan
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9010.00
9010.OOa
9010.01
9010.1
9010.15 (*)
9010.15-01
9012.10
9012.lOa
9012.10a-I (*)
9012.10-b (*)
9013,0-1 (*)
9013.15
9013.15-38 (*)
9013.15-30
9018.00-01
9018.00-02 (*)
9019.00
9024.00-01 (*)
9024.10 (*)
9028.00
9028.OOa
9028.005
9028.OOc
9029.00
12/29/88
10/16/89
08/14/91
11/25/85
02/11/86
09/29/88
05/25/88
06/17/88
07/15/88
08/18/88
10/16/85
04/17/86
05/07/87
03/01/91
02/01/86
09/30/87
01/24/94
09/04/86
03/28/90
07/29/88
03/22/89
01/04/90
05/18/92
•07/01/94
REGION 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
IHLE
Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity: Guidance to State Officials
Agency Review of SARA Capacity Assurance Plans
Headquarters & Regional OSWER Ombudsman Functions
Follow-up to Quarterly Waste Mgmt Directors Meeting
OSWER Priorities
OSWER Integrated Health & Safety Policy for Field Activities
Redelegatlon of Authority Under CERCLA & SARA
Revision of CERCLA Judicial Settlement Authorities Under Delegations 14-13-B & 14-14-E
Waiver of Concurrence on De M1n1m1s Generator Settlements
Redelegatlon of C1v1l Judicial Settlement Authorities under Delegation 14-13-B & 14-14-E
Management of Regional Activities
OSWER Directives System Manual
Direct Malllngrof Policy & Procedural Guidance Directives to States
OSWER Directives System Catalog Guidance & Policy Issued through 03/91
Training Strategy Report
OSWER Training Policies & Procedures. Vol I & II: Appendices
Senior Resource Official Approval of Sole Source Procurement
Review of Unliquidated Obligations
Management Assistance for Superfund Cooperative Agreements
OSWER *s System Life Cycle Management Guidance
OSWER 's System Life Cycle Management Guidance: Part Three
OSWER's System Life Cycle Management Guidance: Part Three
Analysis
OSWER's System Life Cycle Management Guidance: Part Three - Practice Papers- DATA
MODELING. APPLICATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT
Assessment Framework for Groundwater Model Applications
Six Practice Papers
Practice Paper: Benefit-Cost
9200.0-03
* * * SUPERFUND (OERR) *' * *
09/01/89 OSWER Superfund Directory
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9200.04-13
9200.1-01A
9200.1-07
9200.1-11
9200.1-12
9200.1-17
9200.2-01
9200.2-02 (*)
(9200.2-03;
("9200.2-03A)
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
9200
:2-2
.2-221
.3-01C
.3-010
.3-016
.3-1
.3-02
.3-03
.3-05
.3-05
.3-07
.3-08
9200.3-09
9200.3-10
9200.3-11
9200.3-14-1
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 2
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
CAJE IHL£
05/24/94 Management of Records of Decision (ROOS)to Facilitate Public & Agency Access
10/04/88 OERR Administrative Procedures Manual
03/31/89 FY-89 OERR Strategic Management Planning Initiative
02/20/92 Accessing the $50 Million Set-aside 1n the Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response at
National Priorities List (NPL) Sites
05/01/92 Superfund Progress Report - Spring .1992 (PB92-963265)
05/22/96 Focus Areas for Headquarters Support for Regional Decision Making
07/06/89 Unaddressed NPL Sites
12/15/89 Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation
No. 22)
01/30/90 Interim Guidance on Addressing Immediate Threats at NPL Sites (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 22)
01/25/94 Evaluating Imediate Threats at NPL Sites
11/01/86 Superfund Program Evaluation Handbook (FY'87 - Final)
09/01/95 Soperfund Today
07/01/89 Superfund Program Management Manual FY'90. Vpl 1 & 2
06/01/90 Superfund Program Management Manual FY'91. Vol 1 & 2
04/03/92 Correction of FY'92 Superfund Program Management Manual Definitions
05/01/87 Superfund Emergency Response Actions - A Summary of Federally-Funded Removals
10/24/86 Implementation Strategy for Reauthorized Superfund: Short Term Priorities for Action
10/28/86 FY'87 Superfund Comprehensive Accomplishments Plans
06/07/88 Flexibility In FY'88 Superfund Regional Extramural Operating Plan (EXPIRED)
08/10/93 Clarification of FY'93 Superfund Program Management Manual Definitions
12/27/88 Preparation of the 2nd Quarter Proactive Memo
12/11/89 Flexible Funding In the Regional Extramural Operating Plan --Superfund Management Review.
Recommendation 110
12/19/89 Establishing a Construction pipeline
08/01/90 In-House Remedial Investigation & Feasibility Study (RIFS) Initiative SupeRfund Management
Review: Recommendation 45.B.2)
12/27/90 Final Policy on Setting RIFS Priorities
10/01/93 Superfund Program Implementation Manual FY 1994 Vol. I & II
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE f
9200.3-14-2
9200.3-17
9200.3-18/-18FS
9200.3-19/-19FS
9200.3-20
9200.3-23FS
9200.4-00(3)
9200.4-02-2
9300.4-05
9200.4-06A
9200.4-07
9200.4-1
9200.4-14
^9200.4-15}
9200.5-006
9200.5-13
9200.5-1151
9200.5-154
9200.5-162
9200.5-2151
9200.5-2151
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-251FS
9200.5-253FS
9200.5-254FS
04/01/94
09/21/94
05/01/95
05/01/95
05/01/95
09/01/96
03/31/89
04/01/90
09/30/96
02/22/90
03/02/90
02/09/87
01/19/95
07/31/96
11/01/90
10/01/94
02/01/91
01/01/95
12/01/95
06/01/90
10/01/90
04/01/90
06/01/90
09/01/90
12/01/90
05/01791
07/01/91
11/01/PO
11/01/89
11/01/89
HUE
Superfund Program Management Manual FY'94
Integration of Environmental Justice Into OSWER Policy. Guidance. & Regulatory Development
Environmental Justice Action Agenda
Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report
Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report Executive Summary
The Role of Cost 1n the Superfund Remedy Selection Process
Staff Responsibilities for Managing OERR Documents
OERR Publications Standards Toolbox.
Pre-CERCLIS Screening Guidance
Uniform Format for OERR Policy/Directive Memos - Revised Instructions
Coordination of Quick Reference Fact Sheets 90-Day Study - #31A
Guidelines for Producing Superfund Documents
Consistent Implementation of the FY 1993 Guidance on1 Technical Impracticability of Ground^-
Water Restoration at Superfund Sites
Reducing Federal Oversight at Superfund Sites with Cooperative and Capable Parties
Superfund: Environmental Progress
The Environmental Response Center
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990
Inland Area Contingency Plan Region 5
Presumptive Remedies for Soils, Sediments. & Sludges at Wood Treater Sites
Superfund Design & Construction Update Vol. 4. No. 3
Superfund Design & Construction Update Vol. 4. No. 4
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 5. No. 4
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 5. No. 5
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 5. No. 7
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 6. No. 1
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 6. No. 2
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 6. No. 3
Innovative Technology - In-S1tu Vitrification
Innovative Technology - Best Solvent Extraction Process
Innovative Technology - Glycolate Dehalogenation
-------
REGION 5 - OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE
DAE
92Q0.5-321FS
9200.5-4011
9200.5-402A
9200.5-723
9200.5-748
9200.6-02
9200.6-041
9200.6-303(95-1)
9200.7-01(a)
9200.7-01(b)
9200.7-01(abc)
9200. 7-OM
9200.7-021
9200.7-021
9200.9-02
9200.9-02
04/01/90
12/01/90
05/01/92
09/01/90
09/01/90
04/01/88
10/01/92
05/01/95
02/10/89
03/13/89
03/31/89
05/01/89
08/01/92
03/01/94
07/28/93
02/05/96
9201.1-01 (*)
9201.01A
9202.1-04
9202.1-05 (*)
9202.1-06 (*)
9202.1-09
9202.1-10-1
9202.1-10-2
9202.1-12
9202.1-14
9202.1-20
11/27/91
06/01/89
05/22/92
07/07/92
09/04/92
02/11/93
03/01/93
03/01/93
07/29/93
02/02/93
03/01/94
Contact Laboratory Program Analytical Results Database (CARD)
CORAS Bulletin. Vol. 1. No. 10
Contracting & Subcontracting Guide to the Super fund Program
National Priorities List (NPl) sites: Michigan
National Priorities List (NPL) Sites: Wisconsin
National Priorities List (NPL) Docket Guidance
Directory Of Superfund Rulemaklng Dockets. Vol. 1. No. 1
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Superfund Program Directives. Issued from 8/1/88 through 1/31/89
Superfund Program Directives. Issued During February 1989
Catalog supplement: Ordering Information & Catalog Addendum through March 1989
Interim Report Superfund Publications System
Superfund & Enforcement Program Publications Update. Vol. 1. No. 1
Superfund & Enforcement Program Publications Update. Vol. 1. No. 5
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories Are Not Paid for Non-complaint or Unusable Data
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories Are Not Paid for Non-complaint or Unusable
Data: First Quarter FY 96
Implementation of the Superfund Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS): Report
of the Administrator's Task Force
A Management Review of the Superfund Program
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for Addressing Special NPL Site-Related
Issues
Required Contracts Management Training for Regional Superfund Personnel
Initiative to Streamline the Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts'
Award Fee Process
Guidance on Program Management Activities Under ARCS
Compendium of Good Ideas. Models of Success & Lessons Learned. Vol. 1. Highlights
Compendium of Good Ideas. Models of Success & Lessons Learned. Vol. 2. Source Book
Guidance on Preparing Independent Government Cost Estimates (IGCEs)
Current National Superfund Program Priorities
Cost Management Manual for the Superfund Remedial & Enforcement Programs
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9203 0-06
9203.1-01
9203.1-03
9203.1-03A
9203.1-03/SUP
9203.1-051
9203.1-051
9203.1-08
9203.1-10
9203.1-10FS
9203.1-11
9203.1-13
9203.1-14
9204.1-01
9208.0-10
9208.0-11
9208.0-12
9208.0-13
9210.0-01
9221.0-02A
9221.0-1
9221.6-2
9221.2-01FS
9223.0-1A
9225.0-02
9225.0-3
9225.1-01
9225.3-01FS
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 5
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DATE , HUE
06/04/90 Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation #43E)
04/07/92 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
07/07/92 Guidance on Implementation of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) Under CERCLA
& the NCR
10/26/92 Exercising Flexibility Through the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
08/22/94 Guidance on Accelerating CERCLA Environmental Restoration at Federal Facilities
12/01/92 Status of Key SACM Program Management Issues - Interim Guidance. Vol. 1. No. 1
12/01/92 Enforcement Under SACM - Interim Guidance. Vol. 1. No. 3
04/27/93 Further Direction on Implementing the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
07/12/93 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) -- Transmlttal of Questions & Answers Bulletin
& Issue Submlttal Form
07/01/93 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) -- Questions & Answers
09/14/93 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) -- Coordination Strategy
01/28/94 Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM
03/08/94 Update on SACM Implementation
04/20/92 Establishment of OERR Records Management Program
11/06/90 Guidance on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Enforcement Actions
05/01/93 Enforcement Mediation - Status Report on The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution In
Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Actions
10/01/91 Superfund Enforcement Mediation - Regional Pilot Project Results
04/01/92 Superfund Enforcement Mediation - Case Studies
06/27/95 Transmlttal of Guidance for Data Collection at State-lead NPL Sites
05/30/90 CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy Statement
03/04/86 Data Handling Support for CERCLIS
03/31/86 CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy Statement
04/01/91 CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN
11/01/85 Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program (Interim Guidance)
04/25/84 Forwarding Claims to Headquarters
11/25/85 Notification of Restrictions on Reimbursement of Private Party Costs for Removal Actions
04/19/89 Procurement Under Preauthorlzation/Mixed Funding OSWER Directive 9225.1-01
11/01/89 Reimbursement to Local Governments for Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance Releases
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9225.3-01FS-A
9230.0-02
9230.0-03
9230.0-3a
9230.0-3A
9230.0-3B
9230.0-03C
9230.0-04
9230.0-05
9230.0-06
9230.0-08
9230.0-09
9230.0-13
9230.0-15
9230.0-16
9230.0-17
9230.0-18
9230.0-19
.9230.0-20
9230.1-01
9230.1-02
9230.1-03
9230.1-04
9230.1-06
9230.1-10FS
9230.2-01
9230.2-02
9234.0-02
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 6
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
BAH HUE
10/01/92 Reimbursement to Local Governments for Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance Releases
05/09/83 Superfund Community Relations Policy
09/01/83 Community Relations 1n Superfund: A Handbook - Interim Version
03/22/85 Community Relations Activities at Superfund Enforcement Sites -- Interim Guidance
05/05/86 Community Relations 1n Superfund: A Handbook - Revised
06/01/88 Community Relations 1n Superfund: A Handbook - Interim Version
01/01/92 Community Relations 1n Superfund: A Handbook
10/17/83 Community Relations Guidance for Evaluating Citizens Concerns at Superfund Sites
10/02/85 Community Relations Requirements for Operable Units
06/04/90 Superfund Responsiveness Summaries
03/07/90 Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
08/31/90 Community Relations: Use of Senior Environmental Employees In Superfund
12/19/90 Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
06/15/90 Role of Community Interviews In the Development of a Community Relations Program for
Remedial Response
11/05/90 Making Superfund Documents Available to the Public Throughout the Cleanup Process. &
Discussing Site Findings & Decisions as They are Developed
09/28/90 Using State & Local Officials to Assist 1n Community Relations
01/21/91 Incorporating Citizen Concerns Into Superfund Decision-making
09/18/90 Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Community Involvement 1n Superfund
11/30/90 Innovative Methods to Increase Public Involvement 1n Superfund Community Relations
03/20/87 Interim Guidance on Technical Assistance Grants
01/11/88 Technical Assistance Grants Program Activities Prior to the Issuance of the Interim Final
Rule
06/01/88 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical Assistance Grant Program
06/01/88 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Program - Regional Guidance Manual
01/31/90 Technical Assistance Grants: Waivers of $50.000 Cap & Grant Amendments
03/01/95 Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Audits
09/28/88 OERR Communications Planning Process
09/26/88 Peer Review and Approval of Abstracts and Papers
10/02/85 CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmental Statutes
-------
DIRECTIVE f
9234.0-1
C9234.0-05J
C 9234.1 -OH
9234.1-02
9234.1-03
9234.1-06
^234 2-02FS 3
r9234.2-03FSJ
C 9234.2-04FS:)
T 9234.2-OSFSJ
C9234.2-06Fln
C9234.2-07FS3
(234.2-09FS;)
9234.2-10FS
9234.2-11FS
9234.2-15FS
9234.2-25
9234.3-001
9240.0-1
9240.0-2
9240.0-02A
9240.0-028
DAEE
08/19/86
07/09/87
08/08/88
11/01/87
03/13/89
12/27/89
05/01/89
07/01/91
09/01/89
12/01/89
10/01/89
12/01/89
02/05/90
04/01/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
07/01/90
07/01/90
07/01/91
10/04/93
07/01/90
10/01/84
03/20/86
11/20/90
07/06/92
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
TITLE
Consideration of RCRA Requirements 1n Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining Waste Sites
Interim Guidance on Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual (DRAFT): Clean A1r Act & Other Environmental
Statutes
Regional ARARs and LDR Contacts
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to RCRA & CERCLA Ground Water Treatment
Re1nject1on (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No. 26)
ARARs Q's «. A's
ARARs Q's & A's: General Policy. RCRA. CWA. SDWA. Post-ROD Information. & Contingent
Waivers
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - Guide to Manual
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - Overview of ARARs Focus on ARAR Waivers
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - RCRA ARARs: Focus on Closure Requirements
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - CERCLA Compliance with State Requirements
ARARs Fact Sheet Entitled "CERCLA Compliance with the CWA & SDWA"
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - Summary of Part II CM. TSCA. and Other
Statutes
ARARs Q's & A's Compliance with the Tox1c1ty Characteristics Rule: Part I
ARARs Q's & A's Compliance with Federal Water Quality Criteria
ARARs Publications Reference Sheet DRAFT.
ARARs Q's & A's: State Ground-Water Ant1degradat1on Issues
ARARs Q's & A's: Compliance with New SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
(Phase II)
Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Impracticability of Ground-Water Restoration
(Interim Final)
ARARs Short Guidance Quarterly Report
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program
Analytical Support for Superfund
Further Guidance on OSWER Directive 9242.0-02 Analytical Support for Superfund
Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE
9240.0-03
9240.0-05
9240.0-05A
9240.0-25
9240.1-05-1
9242.2-01B
9242.2-02
9242.2-03 C*)
9242.2-05 (*)
9242.2-06
9242.2-068
9242.2-08FS
9242.2-1A
9242.3-03
9242.3-05
9242.3-06
9242.3-07 (*)
9242.3-08
9242.3-08A
9242.3-09 (*)
9242.3-10 (*)
DATE TITLE
Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A)
p8/18/88 Superfund Analytical Review & Oversight
09/01/89 Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Repository Functions
03/08/93 Updated "Specifications & Guidance for Obtaining Contaminant-Free.Sample Containers" April
1992 & Designated as OSWER Directive 9240.0-05A
01/19/93 Reassignment of CLP Transportation Functions
03/17/94 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review
(FINAL)
10-01-87 Emergency Response Cleanup. Services Contracts (ERCs) User's Manual
05/10/89 Site-Specific Contracting for Removals
11/29/91 Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS (FIT/ARCS)
01/22/92 Implementation of ARCS Task Force Plan Recommendations
01/31/92 Superfund Contracts Management Issues
08/05/92 Resources for Preparing Independent Government Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
Assignments
05-01-93 Superfund Response Action Contracts
06/01/86 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users' Manual
07/06/84 Procedures for Initiating Remedial Response
07/25/84 Rem II Contract Award Fee Performance Evaluation
08/25/86 Management of Files from REM/FIT Contract Closeout
03/09/87 Implementation of the Decentralized Contractor Performance Evaluation and Award Fee
Process for Selected Remedial Program Contracts
12/10/91 Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund Project Assignment Between Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy Contractors & the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
06/08/95 Clarification of Policy Regarding Work Assignments to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
07/29/92 Use of Time & Materials & Cost Reimbursement Subcontracts for Remedial Actions Under the
Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy
03/16/92 Congressional Limits for FY'92 Alternative Remedial contracting Strategy (ARCS) Program
Management Costs
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9242.4-01A
9242.5-02
9242.5-02A
9242.6-01 (*)
9242.6-02
9242.6-03
•9242.6-04
9242.6-06
9242.6-07
9242.6-08
9242.6-09
9242.6-13
9242.6-16FS
9250.1-01
9250.2-01
9250.3-01
9250.3-02
9260.1-09
9260.2-00
9260.3-00
9260.5-01
9260.5-02
9260.5-02A
9272.0-01
9272.0-2
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 9
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DATE HUE
07/01/87 Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts Users' Manual
09/26/88 Model Performance Standards for Superfund Project Officers. Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order Officers
12/13/90 Model Performance Standards for Superfund Project Officers. Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order Officers
05/01/89 ARCS Work Assignment Management - Field Guide
01/03/89 Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files
08/09/89 Need for Contract Officers Authorization Before Contractor Activation
10/31/89 OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest Review and Approval Program (Superfund. Management
Review: Recommendation #46.C)
03/28/90 Quality Assurance Review for Extramural Projects: Environmental Measurements
08/31/90 Long Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation
E.2) 1
12/05/90 Total Quality Management (TQM) and quality Assurance (QA) 1n Superfund
12/17/90 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund--Implemehtat1on Framework
09/08/92 Performance Tracking Under ARCS Contracts
06/01/95 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund--Implementation Update
03/03/83 Policy On Cost-Sharing At Publicly-Owned Sites.
06/05/83 Policy On Cost-Sharing of Immediate Removals at Publicly-Owned Sites
05/13/83 Waiver.of 10 Percent Cost-Share for Remedial Planning Activities at Privately-Owned Sites
06/03/83 Guidance on Implementing Waiver of 10 Percent Cost-Share for Remedial Planning
03/24/86 Delegation of Remedy Selection to Regions (Under Delegation #14-5)
04/01/84 Delegations of Authority Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation. &
Liability Act (CERCLA) .
04/16/84 Delegations of Authority Under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) Which are
Applicable to. the Superfund Program
05/25/88 Redelegatlon of Authority Under CERCLA & SARA
09/24/87 Superfund Internal Delegations of Authority
04/01/90 Superfund Internal Delegations of Authority
04/02/84 Implementation of CERCLA Strategy at Federal Facilities
12/03/84 Initial Guidance on Federal Facilities CERCLA Sites
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9272.0-03
9272.0-04
9272.0-05
9275.1-01
9275.2-01
9280.0-02 (*)
9280.0-03
9283.1-01
9283.1-02
9283.1-03
9283.1-04
9283.1-06
^9285.0-OD
f9285.0-01A7>
(9285.0-018)
(9285.1-02:
(9285.1-03;
928S.2-01;
928S.2-Q2S
raaS.i-Ofi
r9285.2-06FSJ
9285.2-07FS
9285.2-08FS
9285.3-01
9285.3-02
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 10
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DATE IIILE
08/19/85 Responsibilities for Federal Facilities
08/19/85 Federal Facilities
08/26/85 Responsibilities for Federal Facilities
07/31/84 Removal Financial Management Instructions
09/21/84 Remedial Financial Management Instructions
08/06/85 Policy on Flood Plans and Wetlands Assessments
05/09/94 Considering Wetlands at CERCLA Sites
03/24/86 Recommendations for Ground Water Remediation at the Millcreek. PA Site
12/01/88 Guidance on Remedial Action for Contaminated Groundwater at Superfund Sites
10/10/90 Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground Water Remediation Options
10/01/90 Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide
05/27/92 Considerations 1n Ground-Water Remediation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facilities --
Update
08/16/88 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy (Renumbered. Formerly 9010.15)
02/19/93 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Standard Operating Practices
11/84/84 Standard Operating Safety Guide Manual
07/05/88 Standard Operating Safety Guides
06/01/92 Standard Operating Safety Guides
01/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP *4 Site Entry
01/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP f7 Decontamination of Response Personnel
01/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP 18 A1r Surveillance
04/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP 16 Work Zones
04/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP 19 Site Safety Plan
04/01/91 Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites
04/01/91 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency Response Without
Regard to Location
04/01/91 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites and
RCRA Corrective Actions
03/15/84 Occupational Safety & Health Technical Assistance and Enforcement Guidelines for Superfund
Hazardous Waste Site Activities
07/07/87 Employee Occupational Health & Safety
-------
DIRECTIVE #
9285.3-05
9285.3-06
9285.4-01
9285.4-02
9285.4-03
9285.4-06
285.4-]
9285.5-T
(^9285.6-03^
9285.6-04FS
9285.6-1
(9285.7-00
^9285.7-02}
^9285.7-OlB)
f9285.7-OlQ
^9285.7-05^
r928S.7-05FO
r9285.7-09AFSJ
^9285.7-0983
REGION 5 • OSHER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
IIILE
11
^9285.7-16^
DATE
05/22/90 Hazmat Team Planning
03/01/90 Priority for Health & Safety Requirements. Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements
for EPA Employees Who Support OSWER Programs
10/01/86 Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual
03/11/87 Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health Assessment Activities with the Superfund Remedial
Process
04/07/88 Health Assessments by ATSDR 1n FY'88
11/21/91 ATSDR Health Consultations Under CERCLA
11/16/87 Updated Reference Dose & Cancer Potency Numbers for Use 1n Risk Assessments
01/14/86 DRAFT Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual
03/25/91 Human Health Evaluation Manual. Supplemental Guidance: "Standard Default Exposure Factors"
03/01/94 Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-Lead Remedial Actions ,
12/17/86 Superfund Risk Assessment Information Directory
03/01/89 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund -- Environmental Evaluation Manual (EPA/540/1-
89/001A)
03/01/89 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund -- Environmental Evaluation Manual. Vol. II.
Interim Final (EPA/540/1-89/001)
12/01/89 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Part A -- Health Evaluation Manual. Vol. I.
Interim Final (EPA/540/1-89/002)
12/31/91 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Vol. I. Human Health Evaluation Manual. (Part B.
Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals. Interim)
12/01/91 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Vol. I. Human Health Evaluation Manual. (Part C.
Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives. Interim)
10/01/90 Guidance for Data UseablHty 1n Risk Assessment (Interim Final)
09/01/90 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
04/01/92 Guidance for Data UseabiHty in Risk Assessment (Part A). Final
05/01/92 Guidance for Data Useability m Risk Assessment (Part A). Final
05/01/92 Guidance for Data Useability 1n Risk Assessment (Part B). Final
05/26/92 Implementing the Deputy Administrator's Risk Characterization Memorandum
02/01/94 Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure Uptake B1ok1net1c Model for Lead in Children
01/04/94 Guidance on Use of Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Values
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9285.9-01
9285.9-02
9285.9-03
9285.9-04
9285.9-05
9285.9-06
9285.9-07
9295.0-02
9295.1-01
9295.2-02
9295.2-03
9295.2-04
9295.4-01
9295.5-01
9295.5-02
9295.9-05
9318.0-05
9319.0-01FS
9320.1-01
9320.1-02
9320.1-03
9320.1-04
9320.1-07
REGION 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 12
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
QAJE TITLE
08/12/94 Role of the Ecological Risk Assessment 1n the Baseline Risk Assessment
02/03/89 Inauguration of the OSC/RPM Program
05/01/89 OSC/RPM Support Program - Mentoring (Pilot. 3 attachments)
06/01/89 Superfund University Training Institutes - Request for Workshop Attendees
06/30/89 On-Scene Coordinator and Remedial Project Manager Special Recognition Awards
09/29/89 Mandatory Training Requirements of OSCs and RPMs
10/31/89 Mandatory Community Relations Training -- Superfund Management Review Implementation
Product Recommendation: 143.P(1)
11/01/89 Implementing the Mentoring Program for Newly-Hired OSCs/RPMs - Superfund Management Review
Implementation Product (Recommendation *45B.n
05/07/92 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the NOAA and the USEPA Concerning the
Notification and Coordination of Activities Pursuant to the CERCLA
04/02/85 MOU Between ATSDR and EPA
06/24/83 Joint Corps/EPA Guidance
12/03/84 Interagency Agreement Between The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S.
. EPA In Executing P.L. 96.510 (CERCLA)
03/21/90 EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment Process. Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement
Methods .
11/05/90 MOU Between ORD and OERR
04/05/85 MOU Between FEMA and EPA for the Implementation of CERCLA Relocation Activities Under PI
96-510
06/14/85 Implementation of EPA/FEMA MOU on CERCLA Relocations
09/29/89 Mandatory Training Requirements for OSCs and RPMs
04/13/87 Environmental Review Requirements for Removal Actions
02/01/90 The Final National Contingency Plan: New Directions for Superfund
02/02/82 Guidance for Establishing the National Priorities List
06/28/82 Guidance for Establishing the National Priorities List
05/17/83 Promulgation of the National Priorities List
07/17/84 National Priorities List Categorization
05/29/87 Interim Guidance for. Consideration of Ss 105(g) and 125 of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthor1zat1on Act of 1986 Prior to NPL Proposal of Special Study Waste Sites
-------
DIRECTIVE #
9320.1-05
9320.1-09
9320.1-11
9320.2-03A
9320.2-03B
9320".2-03C
9320.2-05
9320.2-06
9320.2-07
9320.2-2
9320.3-01
9320.3-02
9320.3-03
9320.3-04
9320.3-05
9320.3-06
9320.3-08
9320.4-01
9320.7-01FS
9320.7-02FS
9320.7-04FS
9330.1-01
9330.1-2
9330.2-01
C9330.2-04,
C9330.2-05J
^9330.2-07:
C9330.2-1D
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
TITLE
13
QAIE
09/10/86 RCRA NPL Listing Policy
08/21/86 Listing Municipal Landfills on the NPL
04/30/93 .Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL Listings
12/01/88 Procedures for Completion and Deletion of Sites from the NPL
12/29/89 Update to the "Procedures for Completion and Deletion of NPL Sites" Guidance Document
Regarding the Performance of Five-Year Reviews
02/19/92 Update No. 2 to "Procedures for Completion and Deletion of NPL Sites"
10/08/92 Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL Deletion Start and Completion Dates
06/21/93 NPL Construction Completion Definition at Bioremed1at1on and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites
08/26/93 Additional Guidance on "Worst Sites" and "NPL Caliber Sites" to Assist in SACM
Implementation
04/04/86 Completion and Deletion of NPL Sites
05/12/83 Guidance for Updating the National Priorities List
01/18/84 Instructions for Promulgating the National Priorities List Update
05/23/84 Procedures for Updating the National Priorities List
12/10/84 Guidance for Proposed NPL Update #3 - February 1985
04/30/85 NPL Information Update - Update 14
09/17/85 Updating the National Priorities List: Update #6 Proposal
02/05/90 CERCLIS Listing
04/18/65 Interim Information Release Policy
11/01/90 The Revised Hazard Ranking System! An Improved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites
11/01/90 The Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As
11/01/90 Closing the NPL Book Under the Original HRS
01/28/83 Requirements for Selecting an Off-Site Option 1n a Superfund Response Action
12/03/86 Evaluation of Program and Enforcement-Lead RODs for Consistency with RCRA Land Disposal
Restrictions
05/06/85 Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-site Response Actions
04/15/86 Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites 1n POTWS
05/12/86 CERCLA Off-site Policy: Providing Notice to Facilities
09/14/89 Notification of Out-bf-State Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes
08/01/90 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS TreatablHty Manual
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9335.0-25A
03/01/91
02/08/89
11/01/89
11/01/89
03/20/84
01/26/96
02/27/85
01/01/88
11/07/88
05/01/92
12/08/92
02/26/87
09/09/92
12/26/91
01/07/86
08/24/93
10/21/93
09/01/93
02/12/88
03/10/89
01/30/89
04/01/92
03/03/86
04/17/89
06/05/89
07/01/89
REGION 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 14
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
. IIILE
Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Remedial Action Projects
A Guide to Developing Superfund Records of Decision
A Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed Plans
Participation of Potentially Responsible Parties 1n Development of Remedial Investigations
& Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA
Revised Policy On Performance of Risk Assessments During Remedial Investigation
/Feasibility Studies (RIFS) Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
Preparation of Decision Documents for Approving Fund-Financed and Potentially Responsible
Party Remedial Actions Under CERCLA
Preliminary Assessment Guidance FY'88
Policy Requiring Utlllztlon of Brochure on Preliminary Assessment Petitions
ECO Update. Vol. 1. No. 4
Standard Document for Remedial Site Assessment Decisions
Expanded Site Inspection: Transitional Guidance for FY'88
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections Under CERCLA
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL Candidate Sites
Comment on Draft Sampling Strategy to Support HRS Scoring
Guidance on Conducting Site Inspection Pr1or1t1zat1on Activities
Integrating Removal and Remedial Stte Assessment Investigations
Integrating Removal and Remedial Site Assessment Investigations
Pre-Remed1a1 Strategy for Implementing SARA
Regional Pre-remedlal Program Objectives for FY'89 and First Quarter of FY'90
Request for Designation of State Natural Resource Trustees
Guide to Management of Investigation - Derived Wastes
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non -Contiguous Sites and On-S1te Management of Waste and
Treatment Residue .
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions Under RCRA
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA
Contaminated Soil and Debris
Superfund LDR Guide II: Overview of RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES CIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
15
DIRECTIVE #
9347.3-02FS
f9347.3-03FS?
9347.3-04FS
1)347.3-051*
'i i. 3
9347.3-06FS
9347.3-06FS
9347.3-06BFS
/J347.3-07FD
(J347.3-08FSJ
9347.3-09FS
9347.3-lOFS
r9347.3-HFSj
9347.3-15
9355.0-3
9355.0-4A;
33S5.0-4B)
9355.0-7A
9355.0-78
9355.0-08
9355.0-10
9355.0-12
9355.0-14
DATE
07/01/89 Superfund LOR Guide #2: Complying With the California List Restrictions Under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide #3: Treatment Standards & Minimum Technology Requirements Under Land
Restrictions Under Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide #4: Complying With the Hammer Restrictions Under Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs)
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide #5: Determining When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are Applicable
to CERCLA Response Actions
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide #6A: Obtaining a Soil and Debris TreatablHty Variance for Remedial
Actions
09/01/90 Superfund LDR Guide #6A (2nd Edition): Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance
for Remedial Actions
09/01/90 Superfund LDR Guide #68: Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance for Remedial
Actions
12/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide #7: Determining When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) are Relevant
and Appropriate to CERCLA Response Actions
10/01/90 Superfund LDR Guide #8: Compliance with Third Third Requirements under the LDRs
09/01/90 A Guide to Del 1 sting of RCRA Wastes for Superfund Remedial Responses
04/01/91 Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances for CERCLA Remedial Actions
10/01/90 CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxlclty Characteristics (TO Rule: Part II
10/01/91 Compendium of CERCLA ARARs Fact Sheets and Directives
07/16/82 Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Site Ranking System - A Users Manual (HW-10)
06/01/86 Superfund Remedial Design and Remedial Action Guidance
06/01/95 Remedial Design/Remedial Handbook
10/17/86 Data Quality Objectives Development Guidance for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Site
Remedial Response Activities (DRAFT)
03/01/87 Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities (Development Process)
04/01/85 Modeling Remedial Actions at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites
09/01/85 Remedial Action Costing Procedures Manual -
11/26/85 Suggested Actions to Keep Projects Moving During Funding Suspension
12/01/87 A Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods
-------
DIRECTIVE f
9355.0-15
9355.0-16
9355.0-17
9355.0-19
9355.0-20
9355.0-21
9355.0-23
9355.0-24
9355.0-24A (*)
9355.0-25
9355.0-25A (*)
9355.0-26
9355.0-27FS
9355.0-28
9355.0-29
9355.0-30
9355.0-36
9355.0-38
9355.0-38FS
9355.0-39FS
9355.0-47FS
9355.0-48FS
9355.0-49FS
Q35S.O-58FD
9355.1-02
9355.1-1
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 16
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DAE , ' • UILE
04/02/86 Third Quarter Superfund Strategy
05/30/86 Superfund Slowdown
07/03/86 Superfund Slowdown
12/24/86 Interim Guidance on Superfund Selection of Remedy
07/23/87 RIFS Improvements
07/24/87 Additional Interim Guidance for FY'87 Records of Decision
10/26/87 Interim Poltey on Funding for Ground & Surface Water Restoration Actions
12/28/87 OSWER Strategy for Management Oversight of the CERCLA Remedial Action Start Mandate
12/22/92 The SARA "200" Remedial Action Starts Requirement
12/09/88 Statement of Policy: Requirements for Using Removal Authorities for Speeding Up Remedial
Projects
07/06/89 Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Remedial Action Projects
02/21/89 Advancing the Use of Treatment Technologies for Superfund Remedies
04/01/90 A Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Actions
06/15/89 Control of A1r Emission from Superfund A1r Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites
08/13/90 Scoper's Notes, An RIFS Costing Guide
04/22/91 Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions
12/11/91 FY'92 Themes for Regional Coordination to Support Continuous Improvements of Superfund's
Remedial Program .
05/01/92 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies Under.CERCLA - Chenical Denalogenation
05/01/92 Chemical Dehalogenatlon Treatability Studies under CERCLA: An Overview
06/01/92 Remedial Action Report - Documentation for Operable Unit Completion
03/01/95 Guidance for Scoping the Remedial Design
09/01/93 Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures
09/01/93 Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites With
Volatile Organic Compounds 1n Soils
09/01/93 Presumptive Remedies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
06/01/9r, Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA) Handbook
09/01/87 The RPM Primer - An Introductory Guide to the Role and Responsibilities of the Superfund
Remedial Project Manager
01/27/86 Draft Federal-Lead Remedial Project Management Handbook
-------
DIRECTIVE I
9355.2-1
9355.3-01
9355.3-01FS1
9355.3-01FS2
9355.3-01FS3
9355.3-01FS4
9355.3-02FS-3
9355.3-03
9355.3-05
9355.3-06
9355.3-07
9355. 3:08
9355.3-09
9355.
9355.
9355.
9355.
9355:
3-11
3-11FS
3-17
3-20
4-01
0355.4-02
C9355.4-02
( 93SM-02/0
M55
9355
4-OT
4-07FS
("9355.4-12?
12/01/86
10/01/88
11/01/89
11/01/89
11/01/89
03/01/90
07/01/89
04/01/91
04/01/91
02/01/88
04/25/88
02/14/89
05/01/89
11/30/89
03/30/90
02/02/91
09/01/90
03/23/93
06/25/93
08/15/90
09/07/89
08/29/91
01/26/90
10/18/89
01/01/92
07/14/94
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 17
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
IULE
Superfund State-Lead Remedial Project Management
Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations & Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA -
Interim Final
Getting Ready Scoping The RIFS
The Remedial Investigation Site Characterization & Treatabllity Studies
The Feasibility Study: Development & Screening of Remedial Action Alternatives
The Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedial Action Alternatives
Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision Documents: The Proposed Plan. The
Record of Decision. Explanation of Significant Differences. The Record of Decision
Amendment
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action, Interim Action, and Contingency Remedy RDDs
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-ROD Changes
Guidance Document for Providing Alternate Water Supplies
RIFS Improvements Follow-up
RI/FS Improvements Phase II. Streamlining Recommendations
Result of FY 88 Record of Decision Analysis
FY 90 Regional Coordination Plan and Themes for the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
S,tudy and Selection of Remedy Process
Result of FY 89 Record of Decision Analysis Superfund Management Review Implementation
Product - Recommendation # 25A
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 93 Focus Areas
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines & Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites w/PCB Contamination
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites
Update on OSWER (Directive #9355.4-02. Sept. 1989) Soil lead Cleanup Guidance
Supplement to Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites
Considerations 1n Ground Water Remediation at Superfund Sites
Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL at Superfund Sites
Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for. CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9355.4-13
£9355.4-141
f9355.4-14FS)
( 9355.4-14FSA)
19355.4-15^
9355.4-23
-233
-0l
r9355.5-OO
9355.5-OlFS
Q355.5-02D
O355.5-02FS)
9355
9355
9355
9355
5-03FS
5-05FS
5-07FS
5-14FS
93S5.5-16FSJ
93S5.5-21FS)
9355;
9355.
9355
6-06T
7
7-01
9355.7-02
9355.7-02A
9355.7-03
9355.7-03A
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 18
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DUE UILI
09/01/93 Evaluation of the Likelihood of ONAPL Presence at NPL Sites - National Results. Final
Report
09/01/93 Draft Soil Screening Level Guidance
12/01/94 Soil Screening Guidance
07/01/96 Soil Screening Guidance: Fact Sheet
07/14/94 Guidance on Residential Lead-Based Paint. Lead-Contaminated Dust, and Lead-Contaminated
Soil
Draft Soil Screening Guidance: Issues Document
11/01/94 Technical Background Document for Soil Screening Guidance
05/01/96 Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document
04/01/96 Soil Screening Guidance: User's Guide
02/01/90 Interim Final Guidance on EPA Oversight of RD/RA Performed by PRPs (Pre-Publication
Version) .
04/01/90 Interim Final Guidance on EPA Oversight of RD/RA Performed by PRPs
09/01/89 ARCS Construction Contract Modification Procedures
06/04/90 Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and Remedial Action
10/01/89 Expediting Remedial Construction
05/01/90 Value Engineering
12/01/89 USACE Preplaced and Rapid Response Contracts
02/01/90 Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USACE Projects
05/30/90 EPA/USACE Payment Process. Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement Methods
02/01/90 EPA Oversight of RD/RA Performed by PRPs
03/01/90 Scoping the Remedial Design
12/01/9: ROD. Annual Report: FY/92 (11/19/93)
11/05/85 Data Quality Objectives for the RI/FS Process
01/02/91 FY'91 Implementation Themes & Regional Coordination Plan for Superfund's Remedial &
Enforcement Programs
05/23/91 Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews
07/26/94 Supplemental Five-Year Reviews Guidance
02/19/92 Permits and Permit "Equivalency Processes for CERCLA On-s1te Response Actions
05/01/95 Estimated O&M Costs for Rods: Historical trends and Projected Costs Through FY 2040
-------
DIRECTIVE
9355.7-03A
9355.9-01
9360.0-02B
9360.0-038
9360.0-05
9360.0-06
9360.0-06
9360.0-08
9360.0-10 (*)
9360.0-12
9360.0-12A
9360.0-13 (*)
9360.0-14
9360.0-15 (*)
9360.0-16A
9360.0-18
9360.0-19
9360
9360
9360
9360
9360
9360.0
9360.0
9360.0
9360.1
9360.2
9360.2-
20
23BFS
29FSA
32
32FS
34
36FS
37FS
01
01
02
REGION 5 - OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 19
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DAK HUE
12/21/95 Second Supplemental Five-Year Review Guidance
06/23/95 Land Use 1n the CERCLA Remedy Selection Process
09/01/93 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund - Interim Final Guidance
04/01/88 Removal Cost Management Manual
02/01/88 Superfund Removal Procedures. Revision No. Three
01/06/85 User's Guide for Removal Cost Management Software
11/27/85 Draft - Relationship of the Removal & Remedial Programs under the Revised NCP
03/17/86 Relationship of the Removal & Remedial Programs under the Revised NCP
01/23/d6 CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Release Sites
07/08/86 Expedited Response Actions
04/06/87 Guidance on Implementation of the Revised Statutory Limits on Removal Actions
06/12/89 Final Guidance on Implementation of the "Consistency" Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
Removal Actions *
04/06/87 Guidance on Implementation of the "Contribute to Remedial Performance" Provision
02/07/87 Use of Expanded Removal Authority to Address NPL and Proposed NPL Sites
04/21/87 The Role of Expedited Response Action Under SARA
07/25/88 Guidance for Conducting Federal-Lead Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action
03/31/88 Removal Program Priorities
03/03/89 Guidance on Non-NPL Removal Actions Involving Nationally Significant of Precedent-Setting
Issues
02/17/89 Required Use of the Removal Cost Management System for All Removal Actions
08/01/95 ERNS and CERCLA - Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)
03/01/95 An Overview of Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)
08/06/93 Transmlttal of Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA
12/01/93 Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA
08/19/93 Determination of Imminent and Substantial Endangerment for Removal Actions
03/01/95 ERNS and Site Searches
03/01/95 ERNS Statistics
10/06/87 Interim Final Guidance on Removal Action Levels at Contaminated Drinking Water Sites
07/18/88 Model Program for Removal Site Management
. 12/03/90 Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site Control
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9360.2-04
9360.2-04A
9360.3-01
9360.3-01
9360.3-01FS
9360.3-02
9360.3-02FS
9360.3-03
9360.3-05
9360.3-06
9360.3-06FS
9360.3-12
9360.3-14FS
9360.3-15FS
9360.4-01
9360.4-02
9360.4-03
9360.4-06
9360.4-07
9360.4-08
9360.4-10
9360.4-12
9360.5-00
9360.7-01
9360.7-02
9360.7-14
.9360.8-10
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 20
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
QAJE HUE
02/24/92 Authorization for Regional Administrators to Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
06/03/92 Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
09/26/90 Transmlttal of Advance Copy of Action Memorandum Guidance
12/01/90 Superfund Removal Procedures Action Memorandum Guidance
12/01/90 A Guide to Developing Action Memorandums
09/01/91 Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on the Consideration of ARAs During Removal Actions
04/01/92 Consideration of ARARs During Removal Actions
06/01/94 Sflperfund Removal Procedures Removal Response Reporting: POLREPs and OSC Reports
07/01/92 .Superfund Removal Procedures Public Participation Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators:
Community Relations and the Administrative Record
04/01/92 Superfund Removal Procedures Removal Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators
07/01/92 A Guide to Removal Enforcement
08/12/93 Response Actions at Sites with Contamination Inside Buildings
06/01/94 Removal Response Reporting: OSC Reports
06/01/94 Removal Response Reporting: POLREPS
06/13/90 Quality Assurance/Quality; Control Guidance for Removal Activities
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling & Surface Geophysics Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Surface Water & Sediment Sampling Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Toxlcity Testing Procedures. Interim Final
04/03/92 Removal Program's Representative Sampling Guidance Document: Volume 1 -- Soil
02/04/12 CERCLA Reporting Requirements for Releases of Ethylene Glycol from Airplane De-Icing
Operations
06/02/89 Proposed Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug Laboratories
10/25/90 Reporting Requirements for Continuous Releases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for
Facilities and Vessels on Compliance
10/25/90 Continuous Release-Emergency Response Notification System: Users Manual for Industry
01/01/95 Questions & Answers on Release Notification Requirements and Reportable Quantity
Adjustments
06/15/93 Interim Guidance for the Determination of Significant and Substantial Harm Facilities for
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9370.0-1
9375.0-01
9375.1-06
9375.1-08
9375.1-09 .
9375.1-2A-6
9375.1-4
9375.1-4-9
9375.1-4-10
9375.1-4-c
9375.1-4-C
9375.1-4-f
9375.1-4-h
9375.1-4-k
9375.1-4-1
9375.1-4-n
9375.1-4-p
9375.1-4-T
08/15/86
05/08/89
07/12/87
06/22/87
07/21/87
12/16/85
02/01/84
03/20/86
12/17/86
05/02/86
12/31/86
01/05/87
10/20/86
03/24/86
02/07/86
08/22/86
03/06/86
11/21/86
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 21
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
IIILE
011 Pollution Act Response Plans
Preliminary FY 87 SPMS Targets
Interim Final Guidance on Preparation of Superfund Memoranda of Agreement (SMOAs)
Cooperative Agreements with Political Subdivisions for Remedial Response
Role of EPA Personnel in the State Contractor Selection Process Under a Cooperative
Agreement
Interim Guidance on State Participation in Pre-Remed1al and Remedial Response
Audits of Superfund Response Agreements: Proposed Addenda to State Participation in the
Superfund Remedial Program Manual
State Participation in the Superfund Remedial Program
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Chapter IX. Audits of Superfund
Cooperative Agreements
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Chapter X. Closeout of Superfund
Remedial Response Agreements
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Appendix C - Documenting State CERCLA
Credits & Advance Match
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix C - Documenting State CERCLA Credits 4 Advance Match
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix F • Sample Cooperative Agreement Provisions
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix H - Sample Articles for Superfund State Contracts
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix H - Community Relations Plan Format and Sample Plan
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL .Volume 1: .
Appendix L - State Lead Quality Assurance Project Plan Guidance
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix N - How to Obligate CERCLA Funds for State & Federal -Lead Response
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix P - Superfund Supplemental Guidance
STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
22
DIRECTIVE f
9375.1-4-U
9375.1-4.-W (*)
9375.1-5
9375.1-6
9375.1-11
9375.1-12
9375.1-13
9375.2-01
9375.2-03
9375.2-04
9375.5-01
9375.5-02
9375.5-02A
9375.5-03
9375.5-03FS
9375.5-04
9375.6-08A
9375.6-11
9375.6-11A
9375.7-01
9375.7-02
9380.0-05
9380.0-06
9380.0-08
9380.0-3
9380.0-13
DAJE
Appendix T - Obtaining and Disposing of Equipment Under a CERCLA Cooperative Agreement
09/11/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix U - Cost Documentation Requirements for Cooperative Agreements
09/29/86 CERCLA Funding of State- lead Removals
03/10/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUNO PROGRAM MANUAL Volume II:
State Procurement Under Superfund Remedial Cooperative Agreements
10/07/86 Draft Guidance for Cooperative Agreements with Political Subdivisions
06/01/88 Guidance: Procurement Under Superfund Remedial Cooperative Agreements
04/27/88 State Access to EPA Contractors During Remedial Response
09/27/88 Clarification on AllowabllHy of Management Assistance to States for ERAs and Removals
12/18/87 Final Guidance on State Core Program Funding Cooperative Agreements
08/02/88 Funding for State Core Program Cooperative Agreement State-Specific Additional Functions
07/19/89 Core Program Cooperative Agreements and Small /Dlsadvantaged Business Utilization in the
Superfund Program]
03/10/89 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart 0. Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for
Superfund Response Actions
10/18/89 Interim Final Guidance on Indian Involvement 1n the Superfund Program
11/28/89 Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian Involvement ,ln the Superfund Program
05/01/89 Political Subdivision-Lead for Remedial Response
04/01/90 Political Subdivision Involvement 1n Superfund
02/12/90 Involvement of Superfund Program Managers 1n Superfund Response Agreement Audits
09/01/90 An Analysis of State Superfund Program: 50-State Study. 1990 Update
05/03/95 Guidance on Deferral of NPL Listing Determinations While States Oversee Response Actions
05/03/95 Response to Comments on the 1988 Proposed NCP Deferral Policy Concept
03/29/93 Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provisions 1n Superfund State Contracts
08/05/93 Obligation of Funds Under Superfund State Contracts
11/01/85 Leachate Plume Management
07/17/86 Guidance Document for Cleanup of Surface Impoundment Sites
09/01/88 Field Screening Method Catalog (USER"S GUIDE)
05/28/95 Guidance Document for Cleanup of Surface Tank & Drum Sites
09/01/85 Covers for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
23
DIRECTIVE *
9380.0-16
9380.0-17
9380.0-17FS
9380.0-19
9380.0-25
9380.0-46
9380.1-02
9380.1-03FS
9380.1-04
9380 .-1-06
9380.1-1
9380.1-13
9380.1-14
9380.2-02
9380.2-06
9380.2-3
9380.3-01
9380.3-02
9380.3-02FS
9380.3-03
9380.3-03
9380.3-04
9380.06FS
9380.3-38
9380.4-01
(9380.s-OIA;
"9380.5-018^
DATE HUE
09/01/89 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies: "Technical Papers"
Domestics Int'l (6/19-21/89). Atlanta. GA
06/10/91 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies in OSWER Programs
08/10/91 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies 1n OSWER Programs
01/01/91 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual Status Report (No. 1)
04/29/96 Initiatives to Promote Innovative Technology in Waste Management Programs
07/01/89 Terra Vac In S1tu Vacuum Extraction System Applications Analysis Report
10/01/87 Hazardous Waste Bibliography
07/01/90 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program - Site Program FS
08/01/90 CF Systems Organlcs Extraction Process - Applications Analysis Report. New Bedford Harbor.
MA
05/01/91 Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies
09/16/86 Superfund Technology Transfer Program. Draft
06/01/91 Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies Used at Hazardous Waste Sites
11/01/90 Technical Support Services for Superfund Remediation. 2nd Edition
07/01/87 SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION (SITE) Operations Plan
03/22/88 SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION (SITE) Program Requirements
12/01/36 SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION (SITE) Strategy and Program Plan
07/12/89 Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assignments
12/28/89 Treatability Studies Under CERCLA .
12/01/89 Treatability Studies Under CERCLA
12/28/89 Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors
03/01/90 Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors: Vol. II
11/30/89 Analysis of Treatab1T1ty Data for Soil & Debris: Evaluation of Lan Ban Impact on the Use
of Superfund Treatment Technologies
11/01/91 A Guide to Principal Threat & Low Level Threat Wastes
05/01/89 Hazcon Solidification Process - Applications Analysis Report. DouglassvillCi PA
03/12/90 Use of ORD's Bloremediation Expertise in Superfund Removal Programs
07/01/89 AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Vol. I."Application of A1r Pathway Analyses
for Superfund Activities" - Interim Final
08/01/90 AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Vol. II. "Estimation of Baseline Air
-------
DIRECTIVE i
(J380.5-01C,)
(9380.5-OlDj
9380.5-04
C9380.5-05J
(938075-01)
9380.5-10
9380.5-13
9380.6-01
9380.6-01A
9380.6-016
9380.6-01C
9380.6-01D
9380.6-01E
9380.6-OIF
9380.6-01G
9380.6-01H
9380.7-01
9380.7-02A
9380.7-02
REGION 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 24
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
BAB IIHE
•
Emissions at Superfund Sites" - Revised Edition
01/01/89 AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Vol. III. "Estimation of A1r Emissions from
Cleanup Activities at Superfund Sites" - Interim Final
07/01/89 AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: 121. IV. "Procedures for Dispersion Modeling
& A1r Monitoring for Superfund A1r Pathway Analysis" - Interim Final
05/01/90 A1r Stripper Design Manual
07/01/90 AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Development of Example Procedures for
Evaluating the A1r Impacts of Soil Excavation Associated w/ Superfund Remedial Actions
11/01/89 Area Source Dispersion Algorithms for Emission Source at Superfund Sites
09/01/89 Soil Vapor Extraction VOC Control Technology Assessment
05/01/90 User's Guide for the Fugitive Dust Model
03/01/90 Comparisons of A1r Stripper Simulations & Field Performance Data
09/20/90 Transmlttal of Solvent Extraction Engineering Bulletin
09/20/90 Engineering Bulletin: Solvent Extraction Treatment
09/20/90 Engineering Bulletin: Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treatment
09/20/90 Engineering Bulletin: Chemical Dehalogenatlon Treatment:Apeg Treatment
09/20/90 Engineering Bulletin: Slurry B1odegradat1on
09/20/90 Engineering Bulletin: Soil Washing Treatment
05/01/90 Engineering Bulletin: In S1tu Steam Extraction Treatment
05/01/91 Engineering Bulletin: In S1tu Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
05/01/91 Engineering Bulletin: Thermal Desorptlon Treatment
03/01/90 Basics of Pump-and-Treat. Groundwater Remediation Technology
03/01/89 Superfund Ground Water Issue - Ground Water Sampling of Metals Analyses
03/01/91 Superfund Ground Water Issue - Characterizing Soils for Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
03/01/91 Superfund Ground Water Issue - Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids
04/01/91 Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of Lead-Contaminated Soils
9410.00-1
* * * RCRA (OSW) * * *
02/01/85 Draft Guidance on Implementation of Minimum Technology Requirements and Corrective Action
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9410.00-2
9420.00-01
9420.00-03
9420.00-04
9420.00-05
9420.00-07
9420.00-08
9420.00-09
9420.00-09a
9420.00-10
9431.01(84)
9432.00-01
9432.00-1
9432.00-2
9432.01(80)
(9432.01(811)
9432.
9432.
9432.
9432.
9432.
01(83)
01(84)
01(85)
02(81)
02(83)
C9432.02(84)
19432.03(84);
9432.04(85)
/9432.05(8417
9432
9433
9433
9433
.07(84)
.00-01
.00-2A
.00-3
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 25
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
QAIE HUE
Requirements of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
06/01/86 EPA Guide for Infectious Waste Management
05/19/86 FY'87 RCRA Implementation Plan
10/16/85 FY'86 PA/SI Strategy - Addendum to the FY'86 RIP
03/31/87 FY'88 RCRA Implementation Plan
04/05/88 FY'89 RCRA Implementation Plan
05/06/91 FY'92 RCRA Implementation Plan
04/27/92 FY'93 RCRA Implementation Plan
04/02/93 FY'94 RCRA Implementation Plan
04/02/93 FY'94 RCRA Implementation Plan Addendum
05/19/94 FY'95 RCRA Implementation Plan Addendum
09/10/84 Permit Policy Question and Answer Quarterly Report
02/11/86 Totally Enclosed Treatment Facilities Exemption for Bag House Sludge
02/01/88 Totally Enclosed Treatment System Proposal TDJ Group. Inc.
03/02/87 Joint EPA/NRC Guidance on the Definition & Identification of Commercial Mixed Lowel-Level
Radioactive and Hazardous Waste
12/30/80 RCRA Regulation of Aerosol Cans
06/28/81 Definition of "Liquid Waste"
02/18/83 Regulatory Clarification of Totally Enclosed Treatment Facility
01/27/84 Determination of Operator at the DOE Oak Ridge Facility
06/26/85 Definition of Treatment
.07/27/8! Totally Enclosed Treatment Facilities ,
11/29/83 Recent Court Decisions on RCRA Applicability to Storage Facilities
02/02/84 Regulation of Hazardous Aqueous Waste at Wastewater Treatment Facilities
04/26/84 Permit Policy for Decannlng & Crushing Operations
08/30/85 Certification of "Existing Units" Under HSWA .
11/06/84 Definition of Treatment as Defined 1n 40 CFR §260.10 Subpart B - Definition
12/24/84 Guidance on Implementation of Wastewater Treatment Unit Exemption
04/16/86 RCRA §3001(f)(2)(B) and States Exclusion of Wastes from Regulation as Hazardous
04/30/86 Determination of Regulatory Status-Light Bulbs
08/11/82 Concurrence on Responses to Pennsylvania Der Dellstlng Activities
-------
REGION S - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
26
DIRECTIVE *
9433.01(83)
9433.01(84)
9433.02(84)
9433.02(85)
9433.03(84)
9433.05(84)
9433.06(84)
9433.07(84)
9434.00-6
9435.00-1
9440.00-1
0441.00-023
19441.01(800.
9441,01(81)
9441.01(82)
9441.01(84)
9441.01(85)
9441.01(91)
9441.02(80)
9441.02(81)
9441.02(83)
9441.02(85)
9441.03(80)
9441.03(81)
9441.03(83)
9441.03(84)
9441.03(85)
9441.04(80)
.04(81)
DALE IlILE
11/14/83 Withdrawal of a Facility's Del1st1ng Petition
02/08/84 Changes Regarding the Del1sting Review Procedures
08/08/84 Response to Questions from State Pesticide Personnel Deregulating Decontaminated Water
05/16/85 RCRA RSI #4: Effect of HSWA on State Del1st1ng Decisions
10/23/84 Oe!1st1ng of Spent Pickle Liquor Generated from the Porcelain Enamel Industry
12/11/84 Test Methods & Standards to Evaluate Cyanide Level 1n Inorganic Wastes
12/18/84 Issues Regarding a Del1st1ng Petition
12/21/84 Information Required for Review of Del1st1ng Petitions
12/10/80 Effect of EPAs MOU with the DOT on Activities 1n States with Cooperative Agreements (PIG-
81-9)
11/03/87 Procedures for Developing Regulations & Guidance Documents
01/07/87 Guidance on the Definition & Identification of Radioactive Mixed Wastes
03/01/86 Guidance Manual on the RCRA Regulation of Recycled Hazardous Waste
05/30/80 Hazardous Waste Regulation of Empty Drums for Reuse & Reconditioning
01/13/81 Interpretation of the Fossil Fuel Combustion Waste Exclusion in §261.4(b)(4)
07/07/82 Interpretation, of the Farmer Exemption Under 40 CFR §261.51
01/06/84 Determining If the Soils from Missouri Dloxin Sites are Hazardous
01/11/85 Impact of the RCRA Regulations on Landfill Gas Condensate
07/p5/91 Applicability of the "Mixture" Rule to Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems
08/19/80 Agricultural Waste Exclusion '
02/18/81 EPA Regulation of Utility Waste
04/19/83 Subtitle C Exclusion of Drilling Fluids and Produced Waters
01/16/85 Exclusion of Sodium Azlde 1n A1r Bag Canisters of Obsolete Automobile Hulks from RCRA
Regulations
09/04/80 Exemption of Certain Waste From Drilling Operations
04/06/81 Paint Wastes as Hazardous Wastes
05/26/83 Scope of Oil and Gas Waste Exemption 1n §3001(b)(2)(A) of RCRA: "Iron Sponge".Process
02/16/84 Residue from a Reclamation Operation
01/23/85 Clarification of the Laboratory Waste Exclusion
11/17/80 Railroad Ties as Hazardous Wastes Under the Mixture Rule
04/10/81 Interpretation of 40 CFR §261.6(b) As It Applies to the Reuse of "Red Water" from TNT
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
27
DIRECTIVE
9441.04(83)
9441.05(80)
9441.05(81)
9441.05(83)
9441.05(84)
9441.05(85)
9441.06(81)
9441.06(84)
9441.06(85)
9441.07(84)
9441.07(85)
9441;08(83)
9441.08(84)
9441.08(85)
9441.09(84)
f 9441.10(831;
9441.10(84)
9441.10(85)
9441,11(85)
9441.12(84)
9441.12(85)
9441.13(85)
9441.14(85)
9441.15(84)
9441.15(85)
9441.18(85)
QAJf IIIJLE
Production
06/06/83 Disposal of Outdated Ordinance by Incineration
11/17/80 Small Quantity Generator
04/14/81 Treatment of Listed Waste
07/12/83 Exemptions from Presumption of Hazardousness
02/19/84 Listing of Residue from the Treatment of a Listed Hazardous Waste
02/04/85 Exemption of Waste Streams Resulting from Extraction. Benef1ctat1on. or Processing of An
Ore or Mineral
06/09/81 Operation of the Mixing Rule V
04/10/84 Regulatory Status of Mixtures of Spent Solvents - F001-F005
02/13/85 Use/Reuse Provisions 1n the Definition of Solid Waste Rulemaklng
03/19/84 Exclusion of Household Wastes
02/13/85 Exclusion of Laboratory Wastes from Dloxin Regulation
10/21/83 Leachate From a Municipal Landfill
05/03/84 Emission Control Dust/Sludge Generated from Electric ARC Furnaces
02/22/85 Use of a Secondary Wastewater Treatment System to Remove biological Solids from an
Activated Sludge Unit
05/09/84 Status of Mining Laboratory Wastes Under 40 CFR 261.4(b)(7)
12/13/83 Triple Rinsing of Containers '
05/15/84 Regulatory Status of Residue from Stream-Stripping of Process Waste Containing Toluene
04/10/85 Perchloroethylene Residue.as a Hazardous Waste
04/30/85 Generation of D1ox1n Wastes from a Labs Analytical Procedures
06/04/84 Status of Supernatant From Lime Neutralization of Spent Pickle Liquor
05/13/85 Z1nc Plating (Segregated Basis) on Carbon Steel
05/15/85 Disposal of Waste Electrolyte from Rechargeable Nickel-Cadmium Batteries with a Potassium
Hydroxide Electrolyte
05/16/a5 Clarification of Mining Waste Exclusion
07/31/84 Existing and Proposed Regulations Addressing RCRA's Coverage of Incinerators that Receive
Gaseous Emissions
05/20/85 Emptying Hazardous Waste from Paper Bags
05/21/85 Determination of Primary SIC Code for a Facility
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9441.19(84)
9441.19(85)
9441.20(84)
9441.20(85)
9441.21(85)
9441.23(85)
9441.24(84)
O441
19441
24(85fl
25184))
9441.25(85)
C9441.26(84j)
9441
9441
9441
9441
9441
9441
726(85)
.27(84)
.27(85)
.28(85)
.29(84)
.29(85)
9441.30(84)
9441.31(84)
(9441.32(841?
C9441.34(84D
9441.35(84)
9441.36(84)
9441.37(84)
9441.50-01A
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 28
* NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
QAIE IHLE
08/15/84 Mineral Processing Residuals Generated by Combustion Units Burning Hazardous Waste Fuel
05/31/85 Empty Drums Containing Metallic Nickel or Nickel Oxide
08/16/84 Clarification of Exemptions Enacted 1n 1980 RCRA Amendments
06/05/85 Use/Reuse Exemption as Applied to Spent Pickle Liquor
06/06/85 Regulatory Status of Brass Dross Skimmings
06/27/85 Disposal Requirements of Scrap OEHP and Small Capacitors Containing DEHP
09/06/84 . Del1sting of Waste Generated from Z1nc Phosphatlng on Carbon Steel - F006 (Wastewater
Treatment Sludges from Electroplating Operations)
06/27/85 Clarification of Recycling Under Revised Solid Waste Rules
09/10/84 Definition of "Empty Container"
07/01/85 Scope of the Term "Abandoned" under Revised 40 CFR 261.2
09/11/84 Definition of "Empty Container" Removal Methods
07/05/85 D1ox1n-Conta1n1ng Laboratory Waste
09/20/84 Regulatory Status of 01butyltin 01 fluoride
07/16/85 Status of Spent Pickle Liquor Used 1n Production of Ferric Chloride
07/16/85 Regulatory Status of Creosote Treated Cross Ties
09/24/84 Z1nc Plating (Waste Streams)
08/23/85 Applicability of "Mixture" and "Derived From" Rules to Petroleum Refinery Wastewater
Systems
tlO/22/84 Contamination of Used 011 Through Normal Use of Through Purposeful Mixing with Hazardous
. Wastes
10/25/84 Clarification of Federal Register Notice Pertaining to Lime-Stabilized Waste Pickle Liquo,
Sludge (LSWPLS) from the Iron and Steel Industry (6/5/84)
11/07/84 Clarification of RCRA Regulations on Hazardous Characteristic
11/28/84 Empty Container Rule
12/07/84 Regulations Applicable to 011/Water Emulsions Generated by Refinery Wastewater Systems
12/17/84 RCRA Implications of Treating Gases Vented from Compressed Cylinders
11/14/84 Clarification of Policy on Hazardous waste Derived from Mixture of Leachate &
Precipitation Run-off at Landfills. Waste Piles and Land Treatment Units
11/20/86 RCRA Exclusions under §3001(b)(2)(A) of RCRA as Applied to Hydrogen (H2S) Sulfide Scrubber
Wastes from Geothermal Power Plants
-------
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
29
DIRECTIVE *
9442.01(84)
9443.00-01A
9443.00-02A
9443.01(80)
9443.01(81)
9443.01(83)
9443.01(84)
9443.01(85)
9443.02(80)
9443.02(84)
9443.02(85)
9443 03(80)
9443.03(84)
9443.03(85)
9443.04(83)
9443.04(85)
9443.05(83)
9443.05(84)
9443.05(85)
9443.06(85)
9443.07(85)
9443.08(84)
9443.09(84)
9443.10(84)
9443.11(84)
9444.01(80)
9444.01(81)
9444.01(82)
9444.01(83)
DAE TITLE
02/07/84 Listing of Spent Iron Sponge as a Hazardous Waste
04/21/86 Evaluating the Ign1tabil1ty of Physical Solids l
04/30/86 Determination of Regulatory Status-Light Bulbs
09/15/80 Corros1v1ty as It Applies to Solid Waste
06/17/81 Sufficient Agitation for the Extraction Procedure Toxlclty Test
01/10/83 Definition of Ign1table Solids
03/01/84 Lithium-Sulfur Dioxide Battery. RIL
02/21/85 Management of Excavated Construction Soil Containing Quantities of Volatile Organic
.Compounds
09/16/80 The Impact of Hazardous Waste Regulations on Food Processors
03/07/84 Regulatory Status of Spent and/or Discarded Lithium-Sulfur Dioxide (L1/SO,) Batteries
02/26/85 Clarification of the Definition of the Characteristic of Ign1tab1l1ty for Hazardous Wastes.
12/22/80 Hazardousness of Paint Residues on Conveyor Hooks
06/04/84 Listing of Agents GB. VX. and HX
04/22/85 Reactivity Test Methods
07/05/83 Regulation of Phosphate Wastes, and Gas Processing Industry Wastes
07/16/85 Clarification of the Sulfide Reactivity Characteristics
07/27/83 Hazardous Waste Identification Regulations as They Apply to Waste Batteries and Cells
09/11/84 Blasting Caps as Reactive Wastes
07/22/85 Regulation Interpretation for Pesticide Applicator Washing Rinse Water
07/31/85 Notes on RCRA Methods and QA Activities
09/18/85 Permit Requirements Applicable to a Water/Methanol Mixture
11/23/84 Designation for Waste Ink and Solvent Mixtures Generated from Printing Facilities
11/29/84 Hazardous Waste Identification: Three Questions
11/30/84 Classification of Small Arms Ammunition with Respect to Reactivity
12/03/84 Evaluation of EP Toxlclty on the Basis of Total Chromium
09/04/80 Interpretations of §261.33
03/12/81 Manufacturing Wastes Containing 261.33 Compounds
09/15/82 Regulation of Paint Filters
06/10/83 Interpretation of RCRA Hazardous Waste Regulations as Pertaining to Spent Solvent Listings
-------
DIRECTIVE f
9444.01(84)
9444.02(80)
9444.02(81)
9444.02(83)
9444.02(85)
9444.03(80)
9444.03(81)
9444.03(83)
9444.03(84)
9444.03(85)
9444.04(81)
9444.04(84)
9444.04(85)
9444.05(80)
9444.05(81)
9444.05(85)
9444.06(80)
9444.07(84)
9444.07(85)
9444.08(84)
9444.08(85)
9444.09(84)
9444.09(85)
9444.10(84)
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
nut
30
QAIE
and the Status of Leachate From Sanitary Landfills that have Received Hazardous Waste
03/05/84 Clarification of the Listings for Metal Heat Treating Wastes F010. FOIL and F012
11/13/80 Wastewater from Refineries
05/19/81 Hazardous Waste Listing P120
07/11/83 Scope of the Listing K061. Emission Control Dust/Sludge from the Primary Production of
Steel 1n Electric Furnaces
03/04/85 Applicability of the RCRA D1ox1n Listings Published 1n the Federal Register on 1/14/85. to
Wastes from Wood Preserving Processes Using Pentachlorophenol
11/17/80 RCRA Regulation of Wastes from Storage of Petroleum Products
06/06/81 Clarification of Hazardous Waste Listing K052
07/20/83 Hazardous wastes from Solar Cell and High Tech Industries
04/10/84 Toxlclty of 2.4-D Waste
04/01/85 Identification of F Solvent Wastes
06/22/81 Freon TF Recovery Still Bottoms
04/26/84 Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Wood Preserving Processes Using Creosote and/or
Pentachlorophenol
04/10/85 Guidance on the Management of Dioxin Wastes
11/18/80 Asbestos as a Hazardous Waste . .
09/16/81 Pesticides Containing A §261.33(e) Compound
05/14/85 Discarded Commercial Chemical Products
12/02/80 Application of K061 Hazardous Waste Listing to Steel Foundries
05/30/84 Ballast Fluid Classification
05/17/85 Exclusion from RCRA Requirements of Used Embalming Fluids
06/06/84 Clarification of RCRA Hazardous Waste Identification Regulation as They Apply to
Deodorants for Portable Toilets
05/24/85 Wastes Containing Unreacted Materials are not Listed Spent Solvents
06/13/84 Zinc Plating (Segregated Basis) on Carbon Steel
06/03/85 Toluene-Laden Filter Residue Generated from an Ink Production Process
07/25/84 Regulation of Wastewater Treatment Effluent from Processes that Generate K001 i F006
Wastewater Treatment Sludge
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9444.10(85)
9444.11(84)
9444.11(85)
9444.12(84)
9444.13(84)
9444.13(85)
9444.14(84)
9444.14(85)
9444.15(84)
9444.15(85)
9444.16(85)
9444.18(84)
9445.01(84)
9445.01(85)
9445.02(84)
9445.02(85)
9445.03(84)
9445.03(85)
9445.04(84)
9445.04(85)
9445.05(84)
9445.05(85)
9450.00-01
9451.00-1A
9451.01(80)
9451.01(85)
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 31
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DAJE IULE
06/05/85 De11st1ng of Process Water Resulting from Incineration of D1ox1n-Contam1nated Wastes
07/27/84 Clarification of K062 - Spent Pickle Liquor Listing
06/19/85 Status of Ion Exchange Resin from Metal Removal from Electroplating Rinse
07/30/84 Regulatory Status of Spent Acid from Electro-polishing of Stainless Steel
07/30/84 Michigan Petition Sb03 Listing
09/03/85 Application of the F006 Listing to Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Electroplating
Operations
07/30/84 Oragout from EPA Hazardous Wastes No. F007 - Spent Cyanide Plating Bath Solutions from
Electroplating Operations (Except for precious metals electroplating spent cyanide plating
bath solutions)
09/10/85 Disposal of Dloxin Containing Waste Rinsates by Deep Well Injection
08/08/84 Response to Questions from State Pesticide Control Office: What 1s Distribution Criteria
for Waste with Only 1 Active Ingredient ^
06/24/85 Regulatory Status of Nalcast 6015/Water/Wax Mixture
09/26/85 Clarification of January 14. 1985. Dioxln Ruling
10/04/84 Listing of Spent Cartridges Containing Perch!oroethylene from Dry Cleaning Establishments
04/23/84 Notes on RCRA Methods & Quality Assurance Activities
04/05/85 Regulating Status of Soil Contaminated with Toluene
04/23/84 Topics Relating to RCRA Methodology and Quality Assurance (QA) Activities
04/23/85 Notes on RCRA Methods and QA Activities .
05/25/84 Analytical Methods for Petroleum Refining Residues and Wastes
05/31/85 Clarification of F019 Listing
11/19/84 EPA-Approved Waste Analyses Test Methods
06/01/85 Notes on RCRA Methods and QA Activities
12/20/84 RCRA Methods and Quality Assurance (QA) Activities
01/18/85 Analytical Methods to Determine the Presence of Creosote and Its Toxic Characteristics
04/01/86 Implementation Strategy for Small Quantity Generators of 100-1000 KG/Month
02/05/86 Letter to Vice Admiral Peter J. Rotz concerning the Interaction between Marpol and RCRA
regulations from Marcla Williams
11/05/80 Liability of a Servicing Company as a Generator of Hazardous Waste
03/01/85 Waste Exchange Programs
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9451.02(80)
9451.02(84)
9451.02(85)
9452.02(84)
9453.01(82)
9453.01(84)
9453.02(85)
9453.03(85)
9454.00-1A
9455.01(85)
9461.01(85)
9463.01(80)
9463.02(80)
9471.00-Ola
9471.03(84)
9471.05(84)
9472.00-1
9472.00-02A
9472.00-03
9472.03(83)
9474.01(84)
9476.00-01
9476.00-02
9476.00-03
11/18/80
09/04/84
07/30/85
10/25/84
08/31/82
05/18/84
03/12/85
06/10/85
05/23/86
06/25/85
09/19/85
06/18/80
11/26/80
04/15/91
09/06/84
11/21/84
02/01/85
07/01/86
07/01/86
12/13/83
09/10/84
09/01/82
09/01/82
05/07/82
REGION 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 32
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
IHLE
Multiple Generator Liability
Responsibility of Generator 1n Hazardous Waste Determinations
Activities that Constitute Hazardous waste Generation
Violation of EPA Hazardous waste Manifest Regulations by Federal Facilities
90-Day Accumulation of Hazardous Waste 1n Tanks
Applicability of EPA's Hazardous Waste Marking Requirement (262.32) to State-Regulated
Wastes
Exclusion from RCRA Permitting Requirements for Less Than 90-Day Accumulators of Dioxin-
Containing Wastes
Intent of 40 CFR 262.34 on 90-Day Accumulation Time
Submission of Waste Minimization Information
Generator Responsibilities for Importation of Hazardous Waste
Building and Consolidating Shipments of Compatible Wastes with Different Hazardous Codes
Department of Transportation Role in the Transportation of Hazardous Waste
Program Implementation Guidance on Issuance of Provisional EPA Identification Numbers
(PIG-81-8)
Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity Guidance to State Officials
Regulation of Tanks Used for Emergency Containment
Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage
and Disposal Facilities
Permit Writers' Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Land Storage and Disposal Facilities
Phase I: Criteria for Location Acceptability and Existing Applicable Regulations
Statutory Interpretative Guidance: Criteria for Identifying Areas of Vulnerable
Hydrogeology
Technical Guidance Document: Construction Quality Assurance for Hazardous Waste Land
Disposal Facilities
Waste Analysis Requirements at Off-Site Storage Facilities
Permit Policy Question and Answer Quarterly
Evaluating Cover Systems for Solid and Hazardous Waste
Closure of Hazardous Waste Surface Impoundments
Financial Assurance for Closure and Post-Closure Care: Requirements for Owner/Operator of
-------
DIRECTIVE f
9476.00-05
9476.00-06
9476.00-07
9476.00-08
9476.00-09
9476.00-12
9476.00-13
9476.00-14
9476.00-16
9476.00-18
9476.00-22
9476.02(83)
9476.02(85)
9476.03(85)
9476.04(83)
9476.04(84)
9476.04(85)
9476.05(83)
9476.05(84)
9477.00-04
9477.00-05
9477.00-06
9477.01(82)
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 33
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
DAIE UHE
Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage.& Disposal Facilities
01/01/87 RCRA Guidance Manual for Subpart G Closure and Post-Closure Care Standards and Subpart H
Cost Estimating Requirements
11/01/86 Final Report/Guidance Manual:Cost Estimates for Closure & Post-Closure Plans (Subparts
G&H) Vols. I-IV
12/30/86 RCRA Policy Compendium for Subparts G and H
03/31/87 Surface Impoundment Clean Closure Guidance Manual
04/14/87 Part 265 Land Treatment Closure/Post Closure Guidance
02/02/88 Closure Requirements
02/08/88 Regulatory Interpretation of the Closure Performance Standard
03/31/88 Ground-Water Monitoring at Clean Closing Surface Impoundment and Waste Pile Units
04/01/89 Effective Dates for Characteristic and Listed Wastes per March 19. 1987 Clean Closure
Regulation
05/12/89 Guidance on Demonstrating Equivalence of Part 265 Clean Closure with Part 264 Requirements
11/01/82 Liability Coverage • Requirements for Owners or Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment.
Storage, and Disposal Facilities
01/11/83 Interpretation of Closure and Post-Closure Requirements Regarding Hazardous Waste
Treatment. Storage and Disposal Facilities
08/27/85 RCRA Policies on Ground-Water Quality at Closure
10/11/85 Permitting Units Created for Facility. Closure
08/10/83 Trip Report: Region X - Closure Standards for Disposal Facilities
08/07/84 Closure Issues Related to Wood Preserving Plants
10/25/85 Applicability of Post-Closure Permitting Requirements to Non-Regulated Units
08/17/83 Definitions for Data Element Dictionary
09/18/84 Closure Activities
03/02/87 Liability Requirements for Facilities Seeking a RCRA Permit
11/23/87 Risk Retention Groups and Financial Assurance Requirements
12/29/87 Guidance for Reviewing Exclusions for Pre-Exist1ng Conditions in RCRA TSDF Insurance
Policies
05/24/82 Part B FlnancUl Responsibility information Requirements for Owners or Operators in States
with Only Phase I Authorization
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9477.01(83)
9477.01(84)
9477.02(84)
9477.03(82)
9477.04(84)
9935.0
9935.1
9936,0
9936.1
9936.2
9936.3
9938.0
9938.02b
9938.1
9938.2A
9938.3
9938.4
9938.4-03
9938.5
9938.7
9938.9
9938.12
9938.13
REGION 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
TITLE
34
DATE
01/05/83 Applicability of the Subpart H Financial Responsibility Requirements
01/12/84 Closure Cost Estimates Based on Third Party Costs
01/30/84 EPA Authority to Enforce Subpart H Compliance at Facilities Located on State-Owned Land
10/08/82 Clarification of Intended Meanings 1n Hazardous Waste Facility Certificates of Liability
Insurance
11/20/84 Insura (Summary of Requirements)
03/14/81 Interim Status Under S3005(e) of RCRA
07/31/81 §3005(e) of RCRA Operation of Hazardous Waste Facilities by Owners or Operators Who have
Failed to Achieve Interim Status
11/29/84 Part B Permit Applications with Insufficient Groundwater Monitoring Data
09/09/83 Guidance on Compliance Orders for failure to Submit & Submlttal of Incomplete Part B
Permit Application
02/19/87 Final Administrative Hearing Procedures for RCRA §3008(h) Orders
01/24/89 Enforcement of Authorized State Laws Pursuant to 40 CFR §271.19 - Formal Comments on State
Requirements Applicable to Facility Permits
04/17/86 Inspection Authority Under §3007 of RCRA
10/01/93 Revised RCRA Inspection Manual (1993 Edition)
04/01/87 Compliance Review Guidance for the Land Disposal Restrictions Rule for Solvents
04/22/88 RCRA Inspection Manual
07/13/88 RCRA Technical Case Development Guidance Document
10/06/88 Inspection Manual for Hazardous Waste Storage & Treatment Tank Systems (not releasable to
public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
04/26/94 Waste analysis at Facilities that Generate. Treat. Store & Dispose of Hazardous Wastes (A
Guidance Manual)
01/23/89 Enforcement Strategy for.the Land Disposal Restrictions First Third Rule (not releasable
to public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
09/28/84 RCRA Compliance/Enforcement Guidance Manual
07/01/91 Conducting RCRA Inspections at.Mixed Waste Facilities
03/01/93 Tox1c1ty Characteristic Rule Enforcement Training Manual
12/17/93 Procedures for Recovering Costs Incurred During Implementation of RCRA Requirements of thi
Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCA) of 1992
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 35
NOTE: (*) -ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE * DATE » IHLE
•
9938.14 03/14/94 Transmlttal of Used Oil Management Inspection/Enforcement Strategy
9939.0 05/19/86 Guidance on RCRA Overt111ng
9940.0 0.7/28/81 Use of RCRA §3008(g) Independently of §3008(a)
9940.1 09/26/84 Issuance of Administrative Orders Under §3013 of RCRA
9940 2 09/21/84 Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the Use of Issuance of Administrative Orders Under
§7003 of RCRA
9940.3 06/26/87 Criteria for Eliminating Headquarter's Concurrence on RCRA §3008(h) Orders
9940.4 07/06/89 Guidance on Administrative Records for RCRA §3008(h) Actions
9943.3-la 12/30/86 Enforcement of the UST Interim Prohibition
9943.3 09/16/86 Enforcement Strategy & Procedures for the "Interim Prohibition" §9003(g) of SWDA
9945.1 .10/01/86 Guidance Concerning EPA Involvement 1n RCRA §7002 Citizen Suits
9946.1 02/08/88 RCRA State Oversight Inspection Guide (not releasable to public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
9950.1 09/09/86 RCRA Ground-Water Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document ^
9950.la 07/01/88 Executive Summary - RCRA Ground-Water Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document
9950.2 12/01/86 Final RCRA Comprehensive Ground-Water Monitoring Evaluation Guidance Document
9950.3 03/30/88 RCRA Comprehensive Ground-water Monitoring Evaluation Document (RCRA Ground-Water
Monitoring Systems, not releasable to public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
9951.1 12/30/86 Transmlttal of the Final Waste Oil Interim Enforcement Guidance Document
9971 07/25/86 FY187 SPMS Targets for RCRA Enforcement
9972.00 02/22/94 Regional Project Officers. Headquarters Zone Project Officers; Contracting Officers, and
i Work Assignment Managers Roles & Responsibilities
9990.0 06/22/83 RCRA Regulation of Wastes Handled by DOE Facilities
9992.0 01/25/88 Enforcement Actions Under RCRA & CERCLA at Federal Facilities
9992.la 03/24/88 Elevation Process for Achieving Federal Facility Compliance under RCRA
9992.1 05/27/88 Agreement With the Department of Energy -- Model Provisions for CERCLA Federal Facilities
Agreements
9992.2 06/17/88 Agreement with the Department of Defense - Model Provisions for CERCLA Federal Facilities
Agreements .
9992.3 08/10/89 Federal Facilities Negotiations Policy
9992.4 01/09/90 Federal Facilities Hazardous waste Compliance Manual
81.15(84) 11/20/84 Definition of Regulated Units
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9481.16(84)
9481.17(84)
9483.00-01
9483.00-02
9483.00-03
9483.00-04
9483.01(83)
9483.01(84)
9483.02(83)
9483.03(83)
9483.05(83)
9483.50-1A
9484.00-IB
9484.00-03
9484.00-05a
9484.01(85)
9484.00-lA-a(86)
9484.01(85)
9484.50-1A
9486.00-02
9486.01(81)
9486.01(85)
9487.00-01A
9487.00-02A
9487.00-03
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 36
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DAJ£ IIILE
12/26/84 RCRA Regulatory Status of .Contaminated Groundwater
12/27/84 Analytical Hethods for Appendix VIII Constituents
12/01/86 Technical Resource Document for the Storage & Treatment of Hazardous Waste 1n Tank Systems
02/01/87 Technical Resource Document for Obtaining Variances from the Secondary Containment
Requirement of Hazardous Waste Tank Systems. Vol. 2: Risk-Based Variance (EPA 530-SW-87-
0028)
10/02/87 Questions & Answers Regarding the July 14. 1986 Hazardous Waste Tank System Regulatory
Amendments
05/19/87 Implementation Strategy for the Hazardous Waste Tank System Regulations
04/15/83 Definition of Tank and Surface Impoundment
02/23/84 Permitting of Hazardous Waste Treatment/Storage Tanks
04/20/83 Tank Shell Thickness Requirement
09/26/83 Tank Inspection Procedures
12/08/83 Waiver of Minimum Shell Thickness Requirement
01/07/86 Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Tank Standards (Subpart J)
04/28/86 Interim Status Surface Impoundments Retrofitting Variances (Interim Final Guidance
Document)
09/15/86 Implementation Strategy for Surface Impoundment Retrofitting Exemptions
10/15/87 Surface Impoundment Retrofitting & Time Allowed for Closure
07/25/85 Interpretation of Section 3005(J)(1)
01/02/86 Request for Comments on Guidance Concerning RCRA Section 3005(J) - Retrofitting Interim
Status Surface Impoundments
07/25/85 Interpretation of Section 3005(J)(1)
01/02/86 Guidance on Variances for RetrofUIng Interim Status Surface Impoundments
09/17/86 Permit Guidance Manual on Hazardous Waste Land Treatment Demonstrations
06/18/81 Hazardous Waste Regulation of Gray Iron Foundry Waste
03/27/85 Criterion for the Application of Hazardous Waste Treatment technologies
04/21/86 Use of Liquids for Wind Dispersal Control at Hazardous Waste Landfills
05/01/86 Prohibition on the Disposal of Bulk Liquid Hazardous Waste 1n Landfills - Statutory
Interpretive Guidance
09/01/82 Hydrologlc Simulation on Solid Waste Disposal Sites
-------
DIRECTIVE »
0
9487.00-40
9487.00-6C
9487.00-08
•
9487.00-09
9487.01(81)
9487.01(83)
.9487.01(84)
9487.01(85)
9487.01-01
9487.02(84)
9487.02(85)
9487.03(85)
9487.04(85)
9487.05(84)
9487.05(85)
9487.50-01A
9488.00-01A
9488.00-02
9488:00-03
9488.00-3
9488.00-04
9488.00-06
9488.00-08
9488.01(85)
9488.02(85)
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 37
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DATE TITLE
01/01/84 The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model. Volumes I & II
10/01/85 Construction Quality Assurance for Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Facilities
OC/03/87 Joint NRC-EPA Guidance on a Conceptual Design Approach for Commercial Mixed Low-Level
Radioactive & Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities
02/10/88 Vertical Expansion at the U.S. Ecology's Trench 10. Beatty. Nevada Facility .
03/12/81 Interim Status of Proposed Landfill Cells
12/05/83 Landfills & Land Disposal Standards
02/07/84 Liner Design
01/22/85 Clarification on the Disposal of Nonhazardous Liquid Wastewaters & Sludges 1n Sanitary
Landfills Under RCRA & HSWA .
04/30/66 Restrictions on the Placement of Nonhazardous Liquids 1n Hazardous Waste Landfills
05/14/84 Conditions for a Variance from Part 264 Landfill Liner & Leachate Collection Requirements
05/10/85 Clarification of Continued Landfill Disposal of "Lab Packs" ^
05/29/85 Clarification of Ban or Disposal of Liquids 1n Landfills
08/07/85 Management of Liquid Hazardous Wastes 1n Landfills
11/12/84 Existing Regulations on the Placement of Liquids in Landfills & Expected Requirements of
the RCRA Amendments
09/20/85 User of Absorbents for Containerized Liquid Hazardous Wastes
11/18/85 "Waiver from Double Liner Requirements Pursuant to §3015(b)(l) and 40 CFR §265.301(0" for
CECOS International. Inc.. W1ll1amsburg. OH. Landfill Cell No. 9
05/21/86 D1ox1n Trial Burns for Purposes of Certification or a RCRA Permit
06/10/86 Permitting Incinerators
06/30/86 Acceptability of Thermal Relief Vents on Hazardous Waste Incinerators
09/01/81 Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration
07/01/83 Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Incinerator Permits
08/01/86 Hazardous Waste Incineration Permitting Study
06/30/86 Acceptability of Thermal Relief Vents on Hazardous Waste Incinerators
01/10/85 Dilution of a Characteristic Waste as a Treatment Process to Qualify for the §264.340
Exemption
01/14/85 Summary of EPA's Regulations Concerning Disposal of Dioxin - Contaminated Wastes by
Incineration or Landfill ing
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9488.03(85)
9488.04(85)
9488.05(85)
9488.06(85)
9488.07(85)
9488.08(85)
9488.50-01A
9489.00-02
9489.01(82)
9490.00-02
9493.00-01A
9493.01(85)
9494.00-01
9500.00-01A
9501.01(82)
9501.01(84)
9501.02(82)
9502.00-02
9502.00-03
9502.00-04
9502.00-05
9502.00-06
9502.00-06C
9502.00-060
9502.00-07
9502.01(84)
9502.01(85)
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIHINATEO
DATE IIILE
04/01/85 Acceptable Levels of Residual Contaminants 1n the EPA Incinerator Residues (Revision)
05/20/85 Modification of Incinerator Permits to Burn D1ox1n Wastes
05/22/85 Effective Incineration of Infectious wastes
06/18/85 Certifying Incinerators & Thermal Treatment Units
06/26/85 Effect of Water-Stripped POHCs on Incinerator ORE
08/30/85 Regulatory Status of Drum Furnaces Burning Hazardous Waste Fuel
11/08/85 Burning Hazardous Waste Fuels 1n Cement KILNS
04/22/86 Issues Relating to Miscellaneous Units
11/23/82 Status of DOD Munitions Oeactlvation Facilities
11/14/80 Used 011 Recycling Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-463) (PIG-81-5)
07/31/86 EPA's Interpretation of the HSWA Prohibition on the Use of Hazardous Waste as a Oust
Suppressant .
07/12/85 Prohibition on Use of Hazardous Waste for Oust Suppression or Road Treatment
08/24/87 Implementation Strategy to Accompany the Proposed Rule for Burning of Hazardous Waste
Fuels
03/14/86 Guidance Document on RCRA Public Involvement
07/09/82 Guidance for Permitting of Hazardous waste Incinerators
11/09/84 RCRA Reauthor1zat1on Statutory Interpretation #1: Immediate Permit Requirements
12/29/82 RCRA Land Disposal Permit Strategy
04/18/86 RCRA Corrective Action at Federal Facilities
08/04/86 Implementation of UIC Corrective Action Requirements
08/14/86 Implementation of RCRA Facility Assessments
10/09/86 RCRA Facility Assessment Guidance
07/24/87 Definition of Solid Waste Mgmt Unit for the Purpose of Corrective Action Under §3004(u!
07/01/87 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Guidance
06/16/89 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Guidance Vol. 1 of IV
(EPA 530/SW-89-031. May 1989)
03/08/88 Use of Corrective Action Authorities at Closing Facilities
12/07/84 Permitting of Refinery Oily Wastewater Treatment Ponds
02/05/85 RCRA Reauthorlzation Statutory Interpretation #3: Immediate Implementation of New
Corrective Action Requirements
38
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9502.02(85)
9502.05(85)
9502.05(858)
9503.01(85)
9503.02(85)
9503.50-01A
9503.51-01A
9503.52-01A
9504.01(84)
9504.02(84)
9505.00-01
9521.00-01
9521.01(84)
9521.02(84)
9521.03(84)
9522.00-01
9522.00-02
9522.00-023
9522.00-03
9522.01(82)
9522.01(85)
9522.02(83)
9522.02(85)
9522.03(84)
9522.03(85)
9522.04(84)
9522.04(85)
9523.00-01A
9523.00-02A
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 39
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
QAJE JJLTLE
06/17/85 Regulation of Wood Treatment Plant Drip Areas as SWMUs
02/05/85 RSI: Guidance on Corrective Action for Continuing Releases
02/05/85 RCRA Reauthorizatlon Statutory Interpretation #3: Immediate Implementation of New
Corrective Action Requirements
05/10/85 Definition of Mixed Waste (DOE Facilities)
08/30/85 Regulation of "Mixed Wastes" at DOE Facilities
12/23/85 RSI Memorandum for RD&D Permits
12/24/85 RD&D Permit for a Sludge Drying Process in a Wastewater System
01/02/86 Permit-Exempt Status of Sludge Dryers Added to Wastewater Treatment Units
08/16/84 Enforcing Groundwater Monitoring Requirements 1n RCRA Part B Permit Applications
11/29/84 Responses and Mechanisms to Prevent GWM Deficiencies
08/19/93 RCRA Public Involvement Manual
10/03/90 RCRA Permit Appeals Guidance Manual
05/02/84 Inadequate Part B Permit Application
02/22/84 Public Participation 1n Permit Issuance
07/09/84 Reporting Withdrawals in SPMs as Final Permit Determinations
09/15/86 Effect of Land Disposal Restrictions on Permits
11/16/87 RCRA Permit Requirements for State Superfund Actions
03/09/88 RCRA Permit Requirements for State Superfund Actions '
11713/87 Region 10's Recommended Revision of 40 CFR §s 270.4(a) & 270.32(b)(l)
05/14/82 Definition of 'Major" Hazardous Waste Generators. Transporters. & Facilities (PIG-82-2)
02/11/85 Signatories to Department of Defense Permit Applications
07/11/83 Revised Definition of "Major Handlers" of Hazardous Waste
04/09/85 Steam Team RCRA Permit Issuance to Facilities in Violation of Other Federal Laws and
Regulatory Programs
07/30/84 Issuance of RCRA Permits to Facility Owners and Operators
07/05/85 Requirements of §213 of HSWA
10/01/84 EPA Review of Draft State RCRA Permits
08/30/85 Partial Permitting
07/05/86 Permit Applicants' Guidance Manual for Exposure Information Requirements Under RCRA §3019
09/26/86 Procedural Guidance for Reviewing Exposure Information Under RCRA §3019
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9523.00-05
9523.00-10
9523.00-11
9.523.00-12
9523.00-14
9523.00-15
9523.00-16
9523.00-17
9523.00-18
9523-01(82)
9523.01(84)
9523:01(85)
9523.02(84)
9523.03(83)
9523.03(85)
9523.05(83)
9523.05(84)
9523.09(84)
9523.10(84)
9523.50-01A
9524.01(82)
9524.01(84)
9524.01(85)
9524.02(84)
9525.01(82)
9527.00-01A
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 40
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
QAJE ' IIILE
07/01/86 Permit Applicant's Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Land Treatment. Storage and
Disposal Facilities
io/01/83 Permit Applicant's Guidance Manual for the General Facility Standards of 40 CFR 264
12/10/86 Denial of RCRA Operating Permits
03/30/87 Summary of Permit Assistance Team (PAT) Comments
03/14/86 Summary of Recent Permit Assistance Team (PAT) Comments
03/30/88 Summary of Permit Assistance Team (PAT) Comments
04/19/88 Call-In of Storage and Treatment Applications
09/02/88 Summary of Assistance Branch Permitting Comments
03/14/89 Summary of Assistance Branch Permitting Comments
10/22/82 Existing Incinerators and Data 1n L1eu of Trial Burn
01/17/84 Estimated Closure Dates in Permit Applications
02/25/85 Required Signatures on Part B Permit Applications V
05/24/84 Guidance on Petroleum Refinery Waste Analyses for Land Treatment Permit Applications (list
of 89 Hazardous Constituents Possibly Present in Refinery Wastes & Column Clean Up
Procedure)
06/17/83 Land toner Signature on Part A Applications
08/19/85 Additional Organic Parameters 1n Evaluation of Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring
07/29/83 Supplemental PAT Comments on McDonnell-Douglas Electronics Part B Applications
09/06/84 Groundwater Monitoring Requirements at a Site Overlying by Two Aquifers
11/23/84 Criteria for Using Trial Burn Information Obtained from One Incinerator to Issue a Permit
at a Second Incinerator 1n L1eu of Conducting a Second Trial Burn at the Second Facility
11/29/84 EPA Authority Under RCRA §3008 to Assess Penalties for Failure to Submit a Complete and
Adequate Part B Application
11/18/86 Post-Closure Part B Permit Requirements
02/08/82 RCRA Permits for Facilities that have Underground Tanks
10/05/84 Use of Compliance Schedules 1n RCRA Permits
08/01/85 Future Permitting of Incinerators Burning Non-Hazardous Waste
10/11/84 Permit Writer Responsibilities in Writing Permit conditions, the Velsicol Decision
01/29/82 Proposed Mechanism for Handling Mobile Treatment Units
05/01/06 Guidance Manual for Research. Development and Demonstration Permits Under 40 CFR §270,65
-------
DIRECTIVE »
9527.01(82)
9527.01-84
9527.02(82)
9527.02(84)
9528.00-01
9528.01(82)
9528.02(82)
9528.50-1A
9540.00-1C
9540.00-03
9540.00-04
9540.00-05
9540.00-6
9540.00-07
9540.00-08
9540.00-09
9540.00-09A
9540.00-10
9540.50-1A
9541.00-01A
9541.00-03
9541.00-03A
9541.00-04
9541.00-6
9541.00-7
9541.00-09
9541.00-10
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 41
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
i .
BAH TITLE
11/02/82 RCRA Permits for Mobile Treatment Units 4 Multiple Sites Using the Same Type of Equipment
03/19/84 The Revised Delegation to Process "Research and Special Inc1nerat1on-at-Sea Permits"
11/02/82 EPA's Mobile Incinerator
07/20/84 Permitting Mobile Treatment Units. PAT Comments: EPA's Mobile Incinerator. Denney Farm
Site. MO
05/25/88 Interim Status Expansion to Add an Incinerator
05/28/82 Changes to Hazardous Waste Mgmt Facilities During Interim Status: Current & Proposed
Regulations
07/20/82 Facility Changes During Interim Status
11/05/85 Interpretation of 40 CFR 270.70(b)
03/31/86 Draft State Consolidated RCRA Authorization Manual k
06/25/85 Guidance on RCRA State Program Reversion
06/06/85 Review of State Statutory Authorities for the HSWA Amendments
08/09/82 Status of Permits Issued Before a State Receives RCRA Phase II
07/01/85 RCRA Reauthor1zat1on and Joint Permitting in Authorized States:
Statutory Interpretation #5
01/15/87 Compliance Schedules for State Program Revisions
04/08/87 Capability Assessments for RCRA Authorization Program Revisions
01/21/88 State Consolidated RCRA Authorization Manual (SCRAM)
11/09/90 State Authorization Manual (SAM) Vols. I & II
01/30/92 Capability Assessment Guidance
11/06/85 Effect on State Authorization of HSWA §3006(f): Availability of Information
06/16/86 State Program Revisions for RCRA
06/10/83 RCRA State Final Authorization Guidance Manual
09/01/82 Equivalency of State Financial Responsibility Mechanisms
02/21/84 Review of State Capability In RCRA Final Authorization
07/30/87 State Program Advisory #2: RCRA Authorization to Regulate Mixed Waste
06/09/88 State Program Advisory (SPA) #3: RCRA Authorization. Non-HSWA Cluster III & HSWA Cluster I
08/22/88 State Program Advisory #5: Revised Model Attorney General's Statement and Models G & H
F^dgral Register Notices for Codification
09/27/88 State Program Advisory #4: State Program Changes for Non-HSWA Cluster IV and HSWA II and
Authorization (PIG-82-5)
RCRA Reauthorization
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9541.00-11
9541.00-12
9541.00-13
9541.00-14
9541.00-16
9541.00-17
9541.00-18
9541.00-19
9541.00-20
9541,01(81)
9541.01(82)
9541.01(83)
9541:01(84)
9541.01(65)
9541.02(83)
9541.02(84)
9541.02(85)
9541.03(64)
9541.03(85)
9541.04(84)
9541.05(85)
9541.05(84)
9541.05(85)
9541.06(84)
9541.06(85)
9541.07(84)
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
TITLE
42
DAE
Associated Revisions to the SCRAM
07/13/89 St'ate Program Advisory #6
09/10/90 State Program Advisory #7 (Memo to Regional Division Directors (1-10)
03/01/91 State Program Advisory #8
01/08/92 State Program Advisory #9
07/28/92 State Program Advisory #10
09/23/93 State Program Advisory #11
04/04/94 State Program Advisory #12
04/07/94 State Program Advisory #13
07/12/94 State Program Advisory #14
09/29/81 States' Role 1n Assigning EPA Identification Numbers (PIG-81-12)
05/17/82 EPA Enforcement of RCRA-Author1zed State Hazardous Waste Laws & Regulations (PIG-82-3)
09/08/83 State Regulation Development & RCRA Final Re-authorization
02/21/84 State Regulation of Radioactive Waste
03/06/85 RCRA Permit Re-authorization Issues 1n Region 3
12/14/83 State Financial Regulations
03/05/84 Jurisdiction & Implementation of the Hazardous Waste Program on Indian Lands
11/20/81 Universe of Wastes for EPA Permit Activities 1n State Authorized for Phased II or Final
Authorization (Ref. PIG-82-1)
04/16/84 Effect on Authorized State of Recent Addition of a Waste Stream to 40 CFR 261.31
03/08/85 Review of State Statutory Authorities for the Hazardous & Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
05/21/84 Determining Whether State Hazardous Waste Requirements are Broader 1n Scope or More
Stringent than the Federal RCRA Program PIG-84-1 .
03/20/85 Application of 40 CFR 271.21(e) ("Moving Target") to Recently Promulgated Regulations
06/13/P4 Transfer of Federal RCRA Permits to Authorized States & Compliance with 40 CFR 124.10(e)
05/08/85 Management of Wastes Newly Regulated Under HSWA
06/27/84 Effect of Applicability Revision on Final Authorization Requirement
05/20/85 Role of Local Governments in Operating Hazardous Waste Programs
06/29/84 State Adoption of Regulations 1n Anticipation of Pending Federal Regulations Which Would
Reduce the Stringency op Scope of the Federal Program
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9541.08(84)
9541.08(85)
9541.09(85)
9542.00-03
9542.00-04
9542.01(80)
9542.01(81)
9542.0K82J
9542.01(83)
9542.01(85)
9542.02(80)
9542.02(81)
9542.02(82)
9542.02(84)
9542.03(80)
9542.03(81)
9542.04(80)
9542.05(80)
9543.00-02
9543.01(84)
9545.00-2
9545.00-4
9545.00-06A
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 43
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
IHLE
09/13/84 Radioactive Waste Exemption 1n North & South Carolina
08/16/85 Revisions to State Program
07/01/85 Re-authorization Statutory Interpretation - #5 RCRA Re-authorization & Joint Permitting 1n
Authorized States \
10/23/80 Federal Register Notice of Public Hearing & Comment Period on State Applications for
Interim Authorization (PIG-81-2)
12/01/80 Final Determinations on State Applications for Interim Authorization Action Memo & Federal
Register Notice (PIG-81-7)
10/03/80 Requirement that State-Permitted Hazardous Waste Facilities have "Interim Status" (PIG-80-
3)
02/12/81 Involvement of States Without Phase II Interim Authorization 1n RCRA Permitting (PIG-81-
11)
05/25/82 State & EPA Interaction Regarding Exclusion of Waste Generated at Individual Facilities
("Dellstlng") (PIG-82-4)
08/02/83 Changes During Interim Status 1n Phase II Authorized States
01/11/85 RCRA RSTI #2: Extensions of Interim Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Programs
10/03/80 Interim Authorization of Program Based on Emergency State Regulations (PIG-80-2)
03/24/81 Transfer of Notification & Permit Application Information to States (PIG-81-10)
07/09/82 Federal Dellstlng & RCRA Permitting In Interim Authorized States
12/17/84 Clarification of State Vs. Federal RpJe 1n Interim Authorization
10/17/80 The Use of State Permitting Systems During Phase I Interim Authorization Not Based on
Explicit Regulatory Standards (PIG-81-1)
11/20/81 universe of Wastes for EPA Permit Activities 1n States Authorized for Phase I Only (PIG-
82-1)
10/31/80 "Del1 sting" of Wastes by Authorized States (PIG-81-4)
11/14/80 State Regulation of Federal Agencies for Purpose of Interim Authorization (PIG-81-6)
12/27784 Additional Guidance on RCRA State Capability Assessments
06/26/84 State Capability Assessment Guidance
07/01/86 RCRA Permit Quality Protocol
05/15/86 FEDTRAK Federal RCRA Regulation Tracking System
08/11/88 RCRA Program Evaluation Guide
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9551.00-01
9551.00-01A
9555.00-01
9560.01(85)
9560.02(83)
9560.02(85)
9560.03(85)
9560.05(85)
9560.10(85)
9560.12(85)
9560.14(85)
9560.15(85)
9571.00-01A
9572.00-01
9572.00-02
9573.00-01
'9574.00-01
9574.00-02
9581.0MA(86)
9595.00-1
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 44
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DATE . TITLE
t
05/23/94 RCRA Policy Statement: Clarification of the Land Disposal Restrictions" Dilution
Prohibition & Combustion of Inorganic Metal-Bearing Hazardous Wastes
02/26/86 Land Disposal Ban Variance Petitioner's Guidance Manual
09/28/90 Memo to All NRC Licensees: Guidance on the Land Disposal Restrictions' Effects on Storage
& Disposal of Commercial Mixed Waste
01/08/85 The Use & Nature RSIs
11/15/83 RCRA Permits for Superfund Sites
04/29/85 Delegation of Authority to Issue Permits
05/08/85 Joint Permitting & Compliance Schedules for Corrective Action
.05/24/85 Loss of Interim Status Provisions
06/03/85 Detection of Gasoline Contamination 1n GW & Detection of LUST
07/10/85 Clarification of Points Raised at an EPA Symposium on RCRA & HSWA
08/05/85 Clarification of Types of Activities that May Be Used to Satisfy the Waste Minimization
Certification
09/11/85 Waste Minimization: Permit Certification & Joint Permitting
07/29/88 Cooperative Agreement Guidance for State Mining Waste Programs
10/16/87 Implementation of HSWA Subtitle D §4005(c)(l)(A) & §4005(0(1)(C)
02/22/88 Letter to State Environmental Commissioners: Subtitle 0 State Solid Waste Management Plans
09/18/92 Exemption for Municipal Waste Combustion Ash from Hazardous Waste Regulation Under RCRA
S300K1)
11/01/88 Clarification of Issues Pertaining to Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs
07/22/92 RCRA Subtitle C Requirements Applicable to Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs
Collecting Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste
01/09/86 Guidance on Use or FY86 Additional RCRA Grant Funds
05/06/86 Facility Management Plann1ng/Mult1-year Strategies
9610.1
9610.2
* *
* UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (OUST)
* * *
02/10/86 when 1s a Tank Considered to be Installed
04/07/86 Clarification of the Definition of "Underground Storage Tank"
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 45
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE * QAE TITLE
9610.3 05/02/86 Revisions & Additions to the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Notification Definitions
9610.05 04/13/88 FY'89-FY'90 Transition Strategy for the Underground Storage Tank Program
9610.05-01 01/30/89 Transition Tasks List
9610.06 05/06/88 The UST Program Appraisal Strategy
9610.07 03/14/88 UST Program Indian Lands Strategy for FY'88 & FY'89 and Guidance for Regional Pilot
Project
9610.08
-------
^iq* '«.
•JK5/88
PAGES DATE
TITLE
C RECORD INBEI
MOMfl IRON * METAL SITE
MCAMJN, OHIO
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
DOCUMENT TYPE
83/06/22
T 8
S 2 85/06/20
£ 12 85/06/26
"7 15 85/09/11
S t> 65/li/lj
^ 7 86/04/02
/£. i 66/10/31
// 11 85/08/00
/Z 1 86/10/17
/3 n oo/oo/oo
/V 1 84/07/12
2 84/08/14
Information on site loc*U, ThcMf Ontko-OEFO
newsiuper articles vti copies
of letters to local
residents and neattn
officials.
(trctnm Village Mter Thous Ontko-OEM
Erin Horan-USEPA Corresponoence
supply.
Letter ret well logs ino
analytical
results of samples.
Ontko-OEM
Notice and description of Erin Hortn-UGEPA
Monitoring Hell Installations
PflP Notice Letter
Constantelot-USEPfl
Mdittonal Engineering Studies.Ike Johnson-OCH Hill
for tne AIM Site.
Results of wll sailing of Allen Mojtas-USEPO
residents.
Site review to EPA Public US Dept Healtn/HuHn Services
Health
Advisor.
Information to residents on Allen Mojtas-ifiEPA
analysis of Mter savples fro*
wll.
Response to residents
information
ret Mere «ells are located.
Margaret NcCue-USEM
Surerfund Proerai Fact Sheet. USEPA
MB« to public ret update on . Hojtas-USEPA RPH
status
of site.
Delegation Analysis Sueoary USEPft
Notice of Agenda ot 7/16/04 McCueHJSEPA
public eeettng.
Trip report:Kick-off Ri/FS Margaret NcCue-USEPA
ting,
Erin Moran-USEPA Correspondence
Gerald Foess-OCH Correspondence
Hill
Or.Sdilosser-Oarke Correspondence
Co-
Harold Shane Cuneipunuente
Allen Uojtas-USEPA Correspondenw
LOUIS* Correspondence
Fabinski-USEPA
HoMrd Fastick Correspondence
Fact Sheet
To all interested Fact Sheet
Meeorandui
HamiaM,Musgrave,Mo Nteoranau*
ran...
File
Nnnrandui
-------
'•4QC NO,
•J//15/W
i-'IC»t/F«« PiSES WTE
/d
'7
1 64/11/27
1 65/06/07
2 66/07/31
i 86/06/21
6 86/09/00
27 35 66/09/02
1 00/00/00
I 84/07/03
e. 86/07/18
23 ' 00/00/00
2^ I 84/07/18
27 76 84/08/13
TITLE
7/18/84.
MWNISTRAHVE RECORD INDEX
(WCflNUM IRON t KETflL SITE
MCflMM, OHIO
ftUTHOR
Trip rtport-impection of
field
AI/FS activities at Arama
10/26/84.
List of Arcanui Rl
distribution.
Trip Report for F5
7/28/86.
Results of public
period.
Erin NorafHJSEM
Margaret ittue-USSW
tarjaret Hcte-USEM
Hartaret BcCue-OSEPR
usm
SuBHry-flppendii A
am list of CotMity
telattora
activities conducted.
Record of Decision
Valdai Adaekes-ifiEPA
Anrancaent of Public Meeting NcCue-USEM
to be held on 7/18784 to
discuss
the investigation of
envi rommtal
hazards at the Arcamei Iron
And Metal Site.
Release *U6BPft
To frtif Residents on
ftruaea, Ohio, Superfund
Site.
Moran t McCue-tiSEPA
Margaret McCue-UGEt*
•U8EPA To Hold Public Meeting
On Arcanusv Iron t Metal
Cleanup*.
List of saealed residential
•ells.
Public eeeting agenda for USER)
7/18/64.
Subcontract docueents for the Moed*ard-Clyde Consultants
installation of Monitoring
RECIPIENT
File
OOOJPOT TYPE
"eeorindui
Allen Mojtas-USEPA MeHrandui
File
File
randw
MM Release
USB*
Release
NM Release
Other
Other
Other
-------
X
y
PrtGES DATE
3 86/07/26
JO * oo/oo/oo
3 83/03/00
67 84/04/13
18 84/06/07
l9 84/06/14
7 84/OoVlS
« 84/10/30
102 85/01/31
riTLf
Wells.
KDM.1NJSTRATIVE RECORD INOEl
IRON t METAL SITE
ARC)***, OHIO
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
fteport:"Review of In-Place USEPA
freamnt Tecnnioues for
Contaeinated Surface Soils.*
Volum t: Technical Evaluation
(Guidance).
Public meting agenda 7/28/86 USEPA
and site information.
Administrative Order ey USEPA
Consent
in tne aatter of Harold
Sham d/b/a Arcanun Iron
And Nttal Co.
583/09/16 Consent Decree in State of ft.SaAli-Atty.6m. Offict
Ohio, et al v. Harold Sham
d/b/a Arcaiwi Iron And Metal
Co. t 444S9, Ct. of Comon
Pleas, DarkeCo., Ohio.
11 66/02/21 Signed Administrative Oroer on Valdas
Consent - in the Batter of
ArcaiMB 2, * IHH86-C-004.
Report:•« teide for
ftevcgetation of
Mined Land in eastern US using
Municipal Sludge.'
ijfl 93/07/15 Remdial Action Master Plan CH2N Hill
Sopper and SeaMr Penn State U
Final tor* Plan
Final CoMUitty Relations
Plan.
Geophysical Survey Plan
Site Safety Plan for Field
Investigations.
CtC* Hill
OtiflHill
uoodNard-Clyde Consultants
OCMHill
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
DOCUMENT TYPE
Other
Other
Harold Sham Pleadings/Orders
Harold Shane Pleadings/Orders
Harold Sham Pleadings/Orders
Reports/Studies
Reports/Stuoies
Reports/Studies
fteoorts/Stodin
CH2N Hill I USEPA Reports/Studies
USEPA Reports/Studies
Technical Men-Additional Data uooOMro-Clyde Consultants
Gathering Task.
Quality Assurance Project Q€H Hill
Ota Hill
USEPA
Reports/Studies
Reports/Studies
-------
-•age 10. »
rlCHE/Fi«€ ktiGES WTE
26 tt/03/17
25 86/05/00
212 86/07/15
87/03/23
3 »»/JO/29
84/11/15
i. 85/02/06.
riTit
Plan
rtWUNl&TRATlvC RECORD INDEI
IRON i *TflL SITE
MCAMK, OHIO
AUTHOR
Hnal UNBOUI Investigation O6JI hill
iteport*
Draft Soil TrNtwK Appendix. CM» Hill
ror LWO ContMinatcd Soils.
Action Plan-Arcanui Muton-Sptr
INCIPIENT
USEM
II
Puohc CoMent-feasaoility
Study (FS).
USEM
USEPA
86/12/31 Soil Sables Rnults:Arc«Mi Aoa« t Springer:Htston-Spir TAT
II
Preoesign Report For The
Selected
USEPA.
Invwtijatiow/
Feasanility Study.
Precision and accuracy of
analyses
ror oata set Sf-777.
Kutnl or Nocnarz-ifiEPA
Data Maple analysis-water Kuttil-USQW
savples.
DOCUMENT TYPE
Reports/Stuoies
Reports/Studies
Reports/Studies
Reports/Studies
Michael fteports/Studie
StrietarUSHM
Reports/Studies
RCVIM of Region V Oata
recieved for rtviM on
12/24/84 of oata set
SF-799.
USEPft-CRL
Saepling/Data
Saepling/Data
J.Kaiser-CHgll Hill Saepl ing/Data
------- |