DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES
AND NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
MISCELLANEOUS FOODS AND BEVERAGES
POINT SOURCE CATEGORY
PART IV
EFFLUENT GUIDELINES DIVISION
OFFICE OF WATER AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
MARCH 1975
-------
-------
-------
DRAFT
SECTION VIII
COST, ENERGY AND NON-WATER QUALITY ASPECTS
This section presents an evaluation of the costs, energy requirements, and
non-water quality aspects associated with the treatment and control alter-
natives developed in Section VII in terms of the model processes and plants
developed in Section V.
COST AND REDUCTION BENEFITS OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT AND CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES
In absence of complete cost information for individual processes, the cost
figures developed herein are based on reliable actual cost figures reported
for various installations coupled with engineering estimates. An estimate
completely applicable to all members of an entire industry is obviously im-
possible. For instance, it must be realized that land costs vary widely.
Construction cost, in terms of both labor and material costs, is another
element that is highly variable. The costs presented herein have been de-
veloped for the different industry subcategories, rather than the entire
industry, thus reducing some of the variability expected in costs. These
costs are, nevertheless, intended to serve as a guide only.Vprincipally for
subsequent economic impact analysis to be conducted by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
Assumptions for Cost Analysis
The following assumptions are common for all of the cost estimates in this
section:
1. All costs are reported in August 1972 dollars. All engineering
cost estimates were made in December 1974 costs and converted to
August 1972 dollars by the Construction Cost Index of the
Engineering News Record.
2. Annual interest rate for capital stock is taken to be eight per-
cent.
3. All investment cost is depreciated over a period of 20 years
except rolling stock which is depreciated over ten years.
4. Salvage value is taken as zero at the end of the depreciation
period.
5. Depreciation is attributed by the straight line method.
841
-------
DRAFT
6. Total yearly cost = (investment cost/2) (0.08) + yearly de-
preciation cost + operating cost.
7. Power costs = $0.04/kw-hr.
8. Excavation and fill is estimated at $3.92/cu m ($3.00/cu yd)
for December 1974.
9. Personnel costs for operation is $5.00/hr plus 50 percent fringe
benefits, administration, and other overhead.
10. All capital construction work is performed by an outside con-
tractor using normal profit margins.
11. When between 10 and 20 aeration units are purchased, a discount
of 5.0 percent is obtained. When more than 20 units are pur-
chased, the discount is 7.5 percent.
12. The December 1974 cost of steel is $0.20/kg ($0.45/lb).
13. The December 1974 cost of concrete is $134/cu m ($175/cu yd).
14. The December 1974 cost of contracted truck hauling of dewatered
sludge or solid waste is $0.77/cu m ($1.00/cu yd).
15. The December 1974 cost of contracted truck hauling of liquid
sludge or wastewater is $5.28/1000 1 ($20.00/1000 gal).
The Feasibility and Costs of Municipal Treatment
Although the purpose of the document is to recommend effluent limitations
guidelines for point source discharges into navigable waters, discharge to
municipal treatment systems is a viable alternative for some installations
and is now the case for many existing plants. To avoid redundancy, costs
for this alternative are not provided for every subcategory, but are ad-
dressed in the following discussion.
The combined treatment of municipal and industrial wastes often offers an
attractive alternative for industry, if municipal treatment is available.
Many plants within the miscellaneous foods and beverages industry dis-
charge to municipal sewers and, in fact, all plants within some of the
subcategories discussed in this document,use municipal treatment. Pre-
treatment for these industrial wastes varies from non-existent to the
equivalent of secondary treatment.
Many of those plants which do not presently utilize municipal facilities
may not have the feasible option to do so because of location restraints.
Others do not use municipal treatment by choice because of municipal
treatment cost or because they had already invested heavily in separate
treatment facilities before municipal treatment became available.
842
-------
DRAFT
It is conceivable that some plants currently discharging to municipal
treatment will in the future decide to provide separate treatment as
municipal charges will inevitably increase. It is even more conceiv-
able that more stringent requirements for pretreatment will be made by
municipalities in the future.
Municipal wastewater charges vary widely, as was illustrated in a sur-
vey by Maystre and Geyer (155) in 1970. The results of the survey
indicated that about 10 percent of small cities, 15 percent of middle
size cities, and 20 percent of larger cities had industrial waste
charges. All of the 28 cities responding to the inquiry based sur-
charges on BOD and suspended solids, or their equivalents per unit
volume, and on the excess loads of the individual plant relative to
some average value stipulated by ordinance. Some cities also consid-
ered excess loads of grease and chlorine demand.
Based on the unit costs of treatment applied by the 28 cities, the in-
vestigators calculated the surcharge cost per month for two hypothetical
industries, both having BOD and suspended solids concentrations of 800 mg/1,
but one industry having a flow of 2830 cu m/month (100,000 cu ft/month)
and the other a flow of 28,320 cu m/month (one million cu ft/month). The
surcharge for the smaller industry ranged from $8/month to $269/month while
the surcharge for the larger industry ranged from $78/month to $2690/month.
VEGETABLE OIL PROCESSING AND REFINING
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcatdgory A 1 - Oilseed Crushing, Except Olive Oi1?_by Direct
Sol vent Extracti on and Prepress Operations
A model plant representative of subcateogry A 1 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which processes
816 kkg (900 ton) of raw oilseed per day.
Alternative A 1-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a
816 kkg (900 ton) per day plant is 148 cu m/day (0.039 MG-) per day. The
BOD waste load is 0.061 kg/kkg (0.122 Ib/ton), the suspended solids
load is 0.038 kg/kkg (0.076 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is
0.069 kg/kkg (0.138 Ib/ton). The model plant developed is assumed to
discharge its process wastewater and noncontact waters separately, and
to provide gravity separation and skimming of process waters. Floatable
oils and sludges from the gravity separation are pumped to an in-plant
oil recovery system.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
843
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A l-II - This alternative provides a flow equalization
basin, complete-mix activated sludge, secondary clarification, a
sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, and a sludge
holding tank.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0072 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.0090 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/ton) and the oil
and grease load is 0.0054 kg/kkg (0.011 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $172,650
Total yearly cost: $ 32,580
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 163. It is assumed
that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is further
assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 88.2 percent
SS: 76.3 percent
O&G: 92.2 percent
Alternative A l-III - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A l-II dual media filtration with a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0036 kg/kkg (0.0072 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.0045 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/ton) and the oil
and grease load is 0.0027 kg/kkg (0.0054 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $189,960
Total yearly cost: $ 37,680
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 164. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.1 percent
SS: 88.2 percent
O&G: 96.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 265.
Alternative A 1-IV - This alternative provides a flow equalization
basin, an aerated lagoon system, and a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0072 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.0090 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/ton) and the oil
and grease load is 0.0054 kg/kkg (0.011 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $154,740
Total yearly cost: $ 38,870
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 165. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
844
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 163
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 1-11
(OILSEED SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SIKKARY FOR I*AST£MTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 88.2 PERCENT 600 REDUCTION
TREATMENT
81..CONTROL HCLSE
B. ..PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
K....ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLLOGE THICKENER
Y...HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
i.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
fc.NGINEER.IMG
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
COSTS*
LABOR
PCwER
CHEMICALS
4. KAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES.
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS?
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
?.. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
97510.00
556«0.00
9750.00
9750.00
172650.00
12490.00
4830.00
0.0
2500.00
19820.00
19820.00
6910.00
5850.00
32580.00
845
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 164
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A l-III
(OILSEED SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HASTEMTEP- TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 94.1 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDuLESs
ei..CONTROL WCLSE
9...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...SLUDGE THICKENER
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUHP1MG STATION
N...DUAL *EDIA FRESSLRt" FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT TCSTSt
1, CONSTRUCTION 111940.00
2. UANH 556aO.OO
3. ENGINEERING 11190.00
a. CONTINGENCY 11190.00
TOTAL 189960.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSt
1. LA80R I2a90.00
2. POER 6990.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4. KATNTENANCERSliPPLlES 3880.00
TCTAL 23360.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS?
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 23360.00
?. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 7600.00
3. DEPRECIATION 6720.00
TOTAL 37680.00
846
-------
J5«.«
u».e
oo
>-
^
>
tit.o
79.0
»3.6
a?.*
12.0
eo.ee ai.io aj.ee ««.se at.ce IT.so e«.co «c.so »2.co «j.se «s,oo
EFFICIENCY
FIGLRE 265
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY Al, ALTERNATIVE II t III
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 165
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 1-IV
(OILSEED SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,.. 68.2 PERCENT ROD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES}
8. ..PUMPING STATIC^
8ASIN
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
L... AERATED LAGOON
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINEH
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
TCTAL YEARLY
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
V. MAINTENANCERSLPPLIES
5. PVC LTNFR
TOTAL
CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
123110.00
3330.00
12310.00
12310.00
3680.00
12490.00
10600.00
0.0
1920.00
100.00
25110.00
25110.00
6190.00
7570,00
38870.00
848
-------
DRAFT
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 88.2 percent
SS: 76.3 percent
O&G: 92.2 percent
Alternative A 1-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 1-IV dual media filtration with a pump station to generate
sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.036 kg/kkg (0.0072 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.0045 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/ton) and the oil
and grease load is 0.0027 kg/kkg (0.0054 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $172,050
Total yearly cost: $ 43,970
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 166. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare/$1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.1 percent
SS: 88.2 percent
O&G: 96.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 266.
Alternative A 1-VI - This alternative provides a flow equalization
basin, and pressurized air flotation utilizing chemical flocculating
agents to enhance floe formation and floatability of wastes. Oil
and grease waste skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil reclamation.
system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.018 kg/kkg (0.036 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.011 kg/kkg (0.022 Ib/ton), and the oil
and grease load is 0.021 kg/kkg (0.042 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $149,370
Total yearly cost: $ 31,200
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 167. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assimed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 69.8 percent
SS: 70.2 percent
O&G: 70.3 percent
Alternative A 1-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 1-VI a complete mix activated sludge unit, secondary clarif-
ication, a sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, and
sludge hauling.
849
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 166
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 1-V
(OILSEED SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR KASTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 94.1 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMFNT MODULES:
P...PULPING STATION1
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
L...AE«ATEO LAGCQN
e...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4..
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTFNANCE&SLFPLIES
FVC LINE*
5.
TOTAL YEARLY
TOTAL
COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3.
TOTAL
137540.00
3330.00
13750.00
13750.00
3660.00
172050.00
12«
-------
§
fc
W)
Z
H4
150.5
1*6.9
1SI.5
»»«.«
JOS. 5
00
tn
>-
>-
O
§
76.5
65.0
51.S
38.C
cc.aa (i.5o fj.oe et.^c Rt.:e VT.SC e«.oe «c.5c <2.oo «i.so «s.oo
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 266
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY Al, ALTERNATIVES IV & V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 167
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 1-VI
(OILSEED SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTEfl TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0 P£RCE*T «00 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MOOULESi
ei..CONTROL MCLSE
B...°UMPING STATION
C...EQI ALIZATICN BASIN
J...AIR FLOTATION
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LANO
ENGINEERING
«. CCNTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CC5TS:
1. LABOR
2. PCWER
3. CHEMICALS
78110.00
55fc40.00
7810.CO
7610.00
1U9370.00
12U90.00
2120.00
0.0
5930.00
20540.00
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2, YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 5970.
3. DEPRECIATION 4690.
TOTAL 31200.00
20540.00
00
00
852
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0036 kg/kkg (.0072 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.0045 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/ton) and the oil
and grease load is 0.0027 kg/kkg (0.0054 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $209,480
Total yearly cost: $ 40,690
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 168. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.1 percent
SS: 88.2 percent
O&G: 96.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 267.
Alternative A 1-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 1-VI (dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon system
including a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0036 kg/kkg (0.0072 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.0045 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/ton) and the oil
and grease load is 0.0027 kg/kkg (0.0054 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $188,460
Total yearly cost: $ 43,300
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 169. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.1 percent
SS: 88.2 percent
O&G: 96.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 268.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategory A 2 - Oilseed Crushing, Except Olive Oil, by.
Mechanical—Screw Press Operations
No model plant was developed for this subcategory in Section V as
the industry presently discharges less than 4000 liters (1000 gallon)
of process wastewater per day to municipal facilities. In Section VII
two alternatives were considered as being applicable engineering alter-
natives for handling these small volumes of waste.
Alternative A 2-1 - This alternative provides no additional treatment.
853
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 168
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 1-VII
(OILSEED SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9U.1 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TP.FATN'ENT MODULES:
PI..CONTROL HCLSE
P... PULPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
J...AIP FLOTATION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
R...SLUDGE THICKENER
Y...MOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1 .
2.
3.
«.
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING. COSTS;
CONSTRICTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
i
2
3
LA30R
PO^FR
CHEMICALS
KAINTF.NANCERSLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL
YEARLY COSTS:
i . YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. D
TOTAL
127360.00
566^0.00
12740.00
12740.00
2094PO.OO
i.OO
'.00
.0.0
7330.00
2U670.00
2^670.00
83PO.OO
76410.00
854
-------
00
en
in
210.0
m.i
IS*.3
>-
^
>-
120.5
IOJ.6
»*.«
Jl.O iv
TO.oo 7j.so Ti.oo 77.se sc.co ti.se is.co i7.se «e.ce 12.so is.oo
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 267
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY AL ALTERNATIVES VI S VII
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 169
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 1-VIII
(OILSEED SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEIMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN' EFFICIENCY
TREATMENT MODULES:
9.4.1 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
8...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
J...AIR FLOTATION
L...AF.RATFD LAGOON
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
2.
3.
a.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
Gt 9 * W I™ t, i»
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANiCE&SLPPLlES
5. PVC LINER
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
i. VEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
151210.00
3330.00
15120.CO
15120.00
3660.00
188460.00
12490.00
6780.00
0.0
7130.00
100.00
26500.00
26500.00
7540.00
9260.00
43300.00
856
-------
169.0
00
en
-sj
7T.sc »J.eo ei.je es.oo 67,«e «e.ce 92.se
FIGURE 268
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY Al, ALTERNATIVE VIII
-------
DRAFT
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 2-11 - This alternative consists of a storage tank and
truck hauling of the wastewater to a municipal sewage treatment facility
or suitable land disposal site. The resulting waste volume to be trucked
averages less than 4000 liter (1000 gallon) per day.
Costs: Total investment cost: $19,450
Total yearly costs: $ 1,510
Reduction Benefits: 100
.Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategfirv_jL_l.-. Hydraulic Pressing and Solvent. Fxtrartinn of
Olive Oil
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 3 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, three alternatives were selected as being applicable engineer-
ing alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels of waste
reductions for the model plant which utilizes 21.7 kkg (24 ton) of whole
olives and 65.3 kkg (74 ton) of cannery pits and culls per day to pro-
duce olive oil. It is estimated that the effluent from the model plant
is 10.9 cu m (0.0029 KG) per day. The BOD concentration is 63,000 mg/1,
the suspended solids concentration is 14,000 mg/1, and the oil and grease
concentration is 3220 mg/1.
Alternative A 3-1 - This alternative consists of a pumping station, a
holding tank and spray irrigation of the raw waste effluent.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is
0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $40,850
Total yearly cost: $ 5,460
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 170. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that no operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
Alternative A 3-11 - This alternative consists of four 0.10 ha (0.25
acre) evaporation ponds, lined with PVC fabric to prevent contamination
of the fresh water aquifer.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is
0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton).
858
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 170
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A3-I
(OLIVE OIL, HYDRAULIC PRESS AND SOLVENT EXTRACTION)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR I"ASTE*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
3E8IGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT POO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESJ
Y...HDLDINC TANK
I...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1. CONSTRUCTION 31020.00
2. LAND 3630.00
3. ENGINEERING 3100.00
4. CONTINGENCY 3100.00
TOTAL 40850.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LABOR 0.0
2, POWER 850.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4. MINTENANCESSUPPLIES 1120.00
TOTAL 1970.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 1970.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 1630.00
3. DEPRECIATION 1860.OC
TOTAL 5460.00
859
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total Investment cost: $60,330
Total yearly cost: $ 6,920
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 171. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that no operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
Alternative A 3-111 - This alternative consists of land spreading the
raw waste effluent.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is
0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $21,720
Total yearly cost: $ 8,330
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 172. It is assumed
that; land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcateciory A 4 - Mechanical'Screw Pressifig for the Recovery of Olive Oil
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 4 was developed in Section V
for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In Section
VII, three alternatives were selected as being applicable engineering
alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels of waste
reductions for the model plant which utilizes 43.5 kkg (48 ton) of whole
olives per day to produce olive oil. It is estimated that the effluent
from a 43.5 kkg (48 ton) per day plant is 114 cu m (0.030 MG) per day.
The BOD waste Toad is 78.2 kg/kkg (156 Ib/ton), the suspended solids
load is 149 kg/kkg (297 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 52
kg/kkg (104 Ib/ton).
Alternative A 4-1 - This alternative consists of a pumping station a
holding tank and spray irrigation of the raw waste effluent.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kq/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is
0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $92,030
Total yearly cost: $10,840
860
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 171
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A3-II
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN A 3-II
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
EVAPORATION POND
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. CONSTRUCTION 48,170.00 .
2. LAND 2,920.00
3. ENGINEERING 4,820.00
4. CONTINGENCY 4.820.00
TOTAL 60,330.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 300.00
2. POWER 0.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.00
4. MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 340.00
TOTAL 1,640.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 1,640.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 2,410.00
3. DEPRECIATION 2,870.00
TOTAL 6,920.00
861
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 172
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A3-III
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN A3-III
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
PUMPING STATION
LAND APPLICATION
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. CONSTRUCTION 16,720.00
2. LAND 1,660.00
3. ENGINEERING 1,670.00
4. CONTINGENCY 1,670.00
TOTAL 21,720.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 6,230.00
2. POWER 100.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4. MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 130.00
TOTAL 6,460.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 6,460.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 870.00
3. DEPRECIATION 1,000.00
TOTAL 8,330.00
862
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 173. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that no operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
Alternative A 4-II - This alternative consists of four 0.4 ha (1.0 acre)
evaporation ponds lined with PVC fabric to prevent contamination of the
fresh water aquifer.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is
0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $254,970
Total yearly cost: $ 49,530
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 174. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
Alternative A 4-111 - This alternative consists of land spreading the
raw waste effluent.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.0 kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton), and oil and grease load is 0.0
kg/kkg (0.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $46,140
Total yearly cost: $11,390
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 175. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
Cost and Reduction.Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Suhcategory--&-5 - Processing of Edib'Te Oil by Gaustic RefTriing
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 5 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels
863
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 173
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A4-I
(OLIVE OIL, MECHANICAL SCREW PRESS EXTRACTION)
FEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
'SIGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
1EATMFNT MODULES:
Y...HOLDING TANK
U... SPRAY IRRIGATION
DIVESTMENT CCSTSj
1. CONSTRUCTION1 66150.00
2. LAND 12660.00
3. ENGINEERING 6610.00
4. CONTINGENCY 6610.00
TOTAL 92030.00
EARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
i. LABOR 0.0
2. POWER 980.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4. MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES 2210.00
TOTAL 3190.00
OTAL YEARLY COSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 3190.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 3680.00
3. DEPRECIATION 3970.00
TOTAL 108^0.00
864
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 174
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A4-II
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN A4-II
DESIGN EFFICIENCY..,100 PERCENT
TREATMENT MODULES:
EVAPORATION POND
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. .CONSTRUCTION 205,CIO. :C
2. LAND 3.96...V.J
3. ENGINEERING 20,500.00
4. CONTINGENCY 20,500.00
TOTAL 254S9?0.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 1,66C.OO
2. POWER • C.OO
3. CHEMICALS 0. T-
4. MAINTENANCE & SUPPLJ£? 25,370.00
TOTAL 2:,0:C OC
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING CC~~ 2/ OJ'.C;
2. YEARLV INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY iu,200.00
3. DEPRECIATION '. ",30C-CO
TOTAL 4i -,30. CO
365
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 175
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A4-III
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN A4-III
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100 PERCENT
TREATMENT MODULES:
PUMPING STATION
LAND APPLICATION
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. CONSTRUCTION 32,920.00
2. LAND 6,640.00
3. ENGINEERING 3,290.00
4. CONTINGENCY 3,290.00
TOTAL 46,140.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 6,230.00
2. POWER 830.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.00
4. MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 500.00
TOTAL 7,560.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 7,560.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 1,850.00
3. DEPRECIATION 1,980.00
TOTAL 11,390.00
866
-------
DRAFT
of waste reductions for the edible oil model plant which refines
454 kkg (500 ton) of crude edible oil per day.
Alternative A5-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
It is estimated that the effluent from
The BOD waste load is
reduction in the waste load.
a 454 kkg per day plant is 314 cu m per day.
4.59 kg/kkg (9.18 Ib/ton), the suspended solids load is 2.49 kg/kkg
(4.98 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 2.39 kg/kkg (4.78 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 5 is assumed to have separate
discharge of non-contact and process wastewaters, in-plant gravity sep-
aration, skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for the
skimmed oil and water wastes.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 5-11 - This alternative provides pressurized air floatation
utilizing chemical flocculating agents to enhance the formation and float-
ability of wastes. Oil and grease skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil
recovery system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.37 kg/kkg (2.74 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.75 kg/kkg (1.50 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.73 kg/kkg (1.46 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $145,530
Total yearly cost: $ 42,500
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 176. It is assumed
that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits:
BOD: 70.1 percent
SS: 70.0 percent
O&G: 69.5 percent
Alternative A 5-111 - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 5-II a complete mix activated sludge unit including a secondary
clarifier, sludge recirculation, sludge thickening, vacuum filtration,
and a sludge holding tank.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $354,770
Total yearly cost: $ 82,560
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 177. It is assumed
that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
867
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 176
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A5-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0
WA8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT BOD "EDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES»
INVESTMENT CCSTSj
1.
2.
3.
a.
B...PUMPING STATION
31..CONTROL HOUSE
J...AIR FLOTATION
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCERSUPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
c. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
71300.
59970.
7130.
24990
1490
00
00
00
7130.00
145530.00
00
00
0.0
5920.00
32400.00
32400.00
5820.00
4280.00
42500.00
868
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 177
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A5-III
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
B.
Bi
J.
K.
G.
S.
Y.
.PUMPING STATION
.CONTROL HOUSE
.AIR FLOTATION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCSTSl
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
2U5660.00
59970.00
24570.00
24570.00
354770.00
24990.00
15350.00
2610.00
10680.00
53630.00
53630.00
14190.00
14740.00
62560.00
869
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97,2 percent
O&G: 97,1 percent
Alternative A 5-1V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 5-III dual media pressure filtration equipped with a pump
to generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton), and the oil
and grease load is 0.014 kg/kkg (0.028 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $386,850
Total yearly cost: $ 91,380
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 178. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.5 percent
SS: 99.6 percent
O&G: 99.7 percent
Alternative A 5-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 5-IV an activated carbon adsorbtion unit before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.021 kg/kkg (0.042 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.017 kg/kkg (0.034 Ib/ton), and the oil and
grease load is 0.007 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $459,900
Total yearly cost: $117,120
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 179. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.5 percent
SS: 99.6 percent
O&G: 99.7 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 269.
Alternative A 5-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 5-II (i.e., dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon with
a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton), and the oil
and grease load is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton).
870
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 178
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A5-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SLPMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 90.2 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
B.
81
J.
8.
Y.
B.
N.
.PULPING STATION
.CONTROL HCU3E
.AIR FLOTATION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLIDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL XEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS?
1.
2.
3.
fl.
CCNSTRLCTICN
LAND
EN-GINIEEPING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCSTSt
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCEHSIPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVFSTPENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
272^100.00
59970.00
27240.00
27240.00
386850.00
24990.00
20450.00
2610.00
11520.00
59570.00
59570.00
15470.00
16340.00
91380.00
871
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 179
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A5-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP KASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MGDULESi
B.
Bi
J.
K.
G.
S.
Y.
B.
N.
Z.
.PUMPING STATION
.CONTROL HOUSE
.AIR FLOTATION
.ACTIVATED 8LUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED CAPBCN ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT COSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
a.
COSTS!
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCEHSLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSt
1. YEARLY CPERATING COST
3. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST PFCTVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
333270.00
59970.00
33330.00
33330.00
U59900.00
24990.00
23520.00
2610.00
27600,00
78720.00
78720.00
isaoo.oo
20000.00
117120.00
872
-------
CO
•^4
CO
o:
IL
O
o
D
U
_1
7o.ro T3.C8 76.cc 7«.c: fi.ce ts.oo ss.os cj.cc ;*.eo ST.OC ico.eo
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 269
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FnR SUBCATEGORY As, ALTERNATIVES 11 THRU v
o
•ya
f>
-n
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $249,080
Total yearly cost: $ 92,170
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 180. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98,5 percent
SS: 97.2 percent
O&G: 97.1 percent
Alternative A 5-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 5-VI dual media pressure filtration and a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton), and the oil
and grease load is 0.014 kg/kkg (0.028 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $281,160
Total yearly cost: $101,010
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 181. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further ass uned that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.4 percent
Alternative A 5-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 5-VII an activated carbon adsorbtion unit before f-inal discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.021 kg/kkg (0.042 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.017 kg/kkg (0.034 Ib/ton), and the oil
and grease load is 0.007 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $354,2":0
Total yearly cost: $126,730
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 182. It is &ssu~;^d
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It :s further
assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.5 percent
SS: 99.6 percent
O&G: 99.7 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 270.
874
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 180
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A5-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SU*MA*Y FOP *AdT£*ATER TREATMENT
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PEPCFKT HOD PfDUCTICK
TREATMENT
P...PUKFING STATION
L...AEKATEO L
INVESTMENT CCSTSf
3. EKGIMFEP-I-VG ?O80,GO
^ • CCNTI\G£NC'Y £ C 0 6 C s 0 0
5. PVC LIKffc 4150.00
T T T A L ? i *5 0 6 0 . 0 0
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
2. PC^ER ifc.-9C,00
3. CHEMICALS C00
<«. ^AlMTFN.ANCFgSLPPLlES 10370,00
5. FVC LUEF 210.00
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY CPFeATUG CCSV «<)*'.-*.
t. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CTST RPCCvFPY V - f.-a
3. DfcPPFClATinr. -£250.
TCTAL - " V
875
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 181
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A5-VII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SliHMPY FOP fcASTEMTE* TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.2 PERCENT PCO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
P.. .PUMPING STATION
J...AJR FLOTATION
L...AERATtD LAGCON
B...PUMPIMG STATION
N...DUAL MFOIA PRESSURE ?ILTRA«.\
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2 .
3.
fl.
5.
CCNSTRUCTIO
L A N 0
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
FVC LINER
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
a. MA1NTENANCERSLPPLIES
5. FVC LINEH
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTg!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY
CCST
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
227S10.00
4 0 fi 0 . 0 0
22750,00
2275uaOO
41
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 182
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A5-VIII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED CDST SLMMRY FOP HASTEHTfR THrAUENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.5 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MOOULESt
E... PUMPING STATIC^
L...AtnATt.r> L AC-CON
fi...PU*P!>;P STATION
N...n.Al "TCIA FRE?Su«E FT.TRA'
7. ..ACTIVATE..'. -A^C.'- 60^rK' !C^
INVESTMENT COSTSl
1. CCNSTRL'CTICN PB33.°0.00
2. LAND *jrorucr
2. ENGINEERING 2*8ar..0f'
^. CCMINGENCY, tffld- .00
5. FVC LTNEP -150.00
TCTAL :-;^21C.OO
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LABCF l
-------
35S.O
(f)
cr
8
u.
o
32?.1
269.2
o
70
22).a
CO
-vl
CO
z
W
h-
>-
v^
>-
<
O
v«*
.J
Ci
<
u
157.4
IZ..7
9j.ce
,-~ Y"
ico.oo
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 270
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY As, ALTERNATIVES VI THRU VIII
-------
DRAFT
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 6 - Edible Oil Processing by Caustic Refining and
Acidulation
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 6 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels of
waste reductions for the model plant which refines 454 kkg (500 ton) of
crude edible oil per day.
Alternative A 6-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no reduction
in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a 454 kkg
per day plant is 534 cu m (0.141 MG ) per day. The BOD waste load is
8.95 kg/kkg (17.90 Ib/ton), the suspended solids load is 4.03 kg/kkg
(8.06 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 3.51 kg/kkg (7.02 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 6 is assumed to have separate
discharge of non-contact and process wastewaters, in-plant gravity sep-
aration, skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for the skim-
med oil and water wastes.
Costs: 0
Reduction Beneftis: None
Alternative A 6-11 - This alternative provides for the addition of
pressurized air flotation utilizing chemical flocculating agents to
enhance floe formation and floatability of wastes. Oil, water, and
solid waste skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil reclamation
system for dewatering, and recovery of inedible oils.
The resulting BOD waste load is 2.68 kg/kkg (5.36 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 1.21 kg/kkg (2.42 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 1.05 kg/kkg (2.10 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $154,540
Total yearly cost: S 44,140
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 183. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 70 percent
SS: 70 percent
O&G: 70 percent
Alternative A 6-111 - This alternative provides for ~/e -. •• of
activated sludge, secondary clarification, sludcs re•• v•_'> ~ r. pjnr.:'
a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration, ana c. litrge T/ -, ^ . .-,.
Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility every four dt-0. The l..:;.iv ;:ea
sludge unit also includes a control house and tw fuT-ti^v operators.
879
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 183
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A6-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SlMKARV FOR MSTEMTER TREM^F.KT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0 PERCENT .BCD PEDUCTICK
B...PUPPING STATION
P 1. .Cl.NTPCL HCL3E
J...AIR FLOTATIO
TREATMENT MCDULESi
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
2.
3.
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS;
1, LABGR
2. POF.K
3. CHEMICALS
LAND
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTS«
1. YEAKLY CPEPATIKG COST
2. YEARLY
CCST
3. D£PRECIATIC\
TOTAL
7679C.CO
62390.00
7660.00
7660.00
24990.00
2100.00
C.C
6220.00
33350.00
33350.00
6160.00
4610.00
880
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.27 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.12 kg/kkg (0.24 Ib/ton), and the oil and
grease load is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.21 Ib/ton),
Costs: Total investment cost: $460,940
Total yearly cost: $105,880
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 184. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Beneftis: BOD: 98.5 perce .t
SS: 97.0 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 6-IV - This alternative provides for Vr.~ addition of
dual media pressure filtration with pump stations to generate sufficient
head for the filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.067 kg/kkg (0.13 Ib/ton). "che suspended
solids load is 0.061 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.023 kg/kkg (0.046 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $497,190
Total yearly cost: $l"i6,050
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 185. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.3 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
Alternative A 6-V - This alternative provides for the addition of activated
carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.030 kg/kkg (0.060 Ib/ton), and the oil
and grease load is 0.012 kg/kkg (0.024 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $620,340
Total yearly cost: $148,780
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 186. It is assumed
that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.3 percent
O&G: 99.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 271.
881
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 184
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A6-III
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SlfcMRY FOR M3TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCOL'LESi
B...PUMPI.VS STATION
Bl . .CGiN.THC-1. *CLSE
J...AIR FLCTATICN
«... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
a.. .SLUG? TUCKENE?
S . . . V A C L I • V. FILTRATION
Y... HOLD I ^ TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTS!
1. CCVSTRUCTKN 3^21^0. 30
2. LAND i>23lO.OO
3. FN-C-lNff »1NG ',3220.00'
^. CCN'Tl!vklr'"CY 33^2C,00
TCTA!. ii^:. 9^0.0 •'/
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LAgnfc 2^990.00
2. rC'-.E* 26:^0.00
3. CHfe'HlCALS 3udO.CC
a . ^AlNTE^ifCF&SLPPLlES 13040. ': 0
TCTA._ 675 10. CO
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS J
1. VF.-iRLY CPi-S4T!".G CCST
c c: s T a E c c v K p v - - . ; c n
3. DEPSiECIATI:-^ 199--.
TCTAL IC^r-r.
882
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 185
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A6-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
COST SUMMARY FOR
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3
KASTEfcATER TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESi
B.
Bl
J.
K.
0.
S.
Y.
«.
N.
.PUMPING STATION
.CONTROL HCUSE
.AIR FLOTATION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLLDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE PILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
.4.
CONSTRUCTION
LANP
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTS:
LABOR
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIE8
TCTAL
TCTAL YEAHLY CCSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2.. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3n DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
362400.00
62310.00
36240.00
36240.00
497190.00
24990.00
32330.00
3480.00
13620.00
74420.00
74420.00
19690.00
21740,00
116050.00
883
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 186
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A6-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6
WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
MODULES:
B...PUMPING STATION
Bl..CONTROL HCLSE
J...AIB FLOTATION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLLDGE THICKENER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
V...HOLDING TANK
8...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
Z...ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT COSTSj
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
a, CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEAPLY
OPERATING
1.
26
3.
4.
CCSTSl
LABOR
PCWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS?
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
065030.00
62310.00
46500.00
a6500.00
630340.00
24990.CO
36660.00
3460.00
30940.00
96070.00
96070.00
24610.00
27900.00
148780.00
884
-------
(rt
« 3
ui E
* ** •*•••••**••••«•*•»•••••»»•••»••••_•••»••«»« ••»•»•»»» •••»•»«••
A* * 4 * • . * _ . .^. »___ ^* f »»— f
ro.ee 7i.ce 76.cc 7«.ec «.ee «s.ee aa.co «i.ec ^ioo 17.00 lec.'ej
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 271
AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY Ae, ALTERNATIVES II THRU V
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 6-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 6-II (i.e., dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon system
including a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0,27 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.12 kg/kkg (0.24 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.21 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $374,050
Total yearly cost: $152,640
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 187. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required,
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97,0 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 6-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 6-VI dual media pressure filtration with a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.067 kg/kkg (0.13 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.061 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.023 kg/kkg (0.046 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $410,300
Total yearly cost: $162,800
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 188. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
Alternative A 6-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 6-VII an activated carbon adsorption unit prior to final dis-
charge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.030 kg/kkg (0.060 Ib/ton), and the oil
and grease load is 0.012 kg/kkg (0.024 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $533,480
Total yearly cost: $195,540
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 189. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre)* It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
886
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 187
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A6-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMKAKY FCR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.7 PERCENT eCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
B...PUHPJMG STATION
J...AIR FLCTATICN
L...AEPATEC. LAGrfN.
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1. CCNSTPLT1 Tf> 3f PI 10.00
2 . L A N D 5'.'' 0 0 . 0 0
NG 30 MO. 00
r Y 3 *. • ;,. n n
5. PVC LIKEt* . fi-iiO. C i
TCTAL 37a05C.--0
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSt
1. L A « G ft i 2 6 Q * r. 0 0
2. vrhFjj 915'--. •*• c
3. C-E^ICALS -.f
u. 'VAINTFN'*MCERSIP?LI£.S i...- ft ;' * c
5. PVC LINFR 50' «o
TCTAu l-'-eS'.OO
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEAKLY CPRPATIN" '^S7 ::-'r:?0
2. YEARLY INVF
CCST RECCV-»
3. DEPRFCIATI^N
TCTAL
887
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 188
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A6-VII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOB >' ASTEK ATER TftSiTfE."
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... <>9.3 PERCEM BCD ^C.CiY
TREATMENT MODULES:
P . . . P i v p I ?•' G s r - - ;: r v
J...AIP
B...°U*P".vP STATIC-
N...'"H.'4L ."FOIA ??Ei
INVE8TMEM CCSTSJ
3 . t N c- T • "- •':. K r- G : - • •- . o o
«. Ct:,STI'- L-F-^CY .00
5. PVC LT>F"^ -• v
TCTAL "1C;, CO
NEARLY OPERATING CCSTSr
1. LABOR lca«i ,co
2. PT^ER <97<520acn
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4 . !*AINTEMisCE*£i_PPLn- > 7 * 4 0 "
5. PVC LUFK j«:80.
TCTAL .26130.00
fCTAL YEARLY COSTS!
l . YE 4 PLY cr;- FA •••'!> •"- • ':£"'
3. Yti^lY I^ Vt ; ' "- • '
CCS7 ftFCCVci
3. 3E?»FwiATI~\
TC -''L,
888
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 189
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A6-v.II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST 8UMMRY FQR MSTEMTFP TPtAT^Ef-T O
)ESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99. 6 PERCENT BCD PEOUC7IC.\
TREATMENT MCDULESi
8...PUMPIMG STATION
J...AIR FLPTATTCN
L... AERATED LAGCCA
9.. .PULING STATIC*
N...OUAI KECIA PPF.SSu*E FILTSV'
2 . . o A c T i v 4 T E r r * s r. •-• -N. &••..-• r; i- P )""•- c
INVESTMENT CfSTS*
1. fCNRTRlJCTlCK . -r^eC.C-O
2. LAND 51 ' 0, J:
3. ENGINEERING -• 13' ^. 0
4. CCNT!\GE\-TiT' ?• - • •'
e B V?6Ri_Y '. > VF?f - ,"'
CCST R? f V.= « f
3. CE^KtCIurir; .,
-
389
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.3 percent
O&G: 99.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 272.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 7 - Edible Oil Processing by Caustic Refining,
Acidulation, Oil Processing, and Deodorization
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 7 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which refines
454 kkg (500 ton) of crude edible oil per day.
Alternative A 7-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 454 kkg per day plant is 1147 cu m (0.303 M6 ) per day. The BOD
waste load is 16.09 kg/kkg (32.18 lb/ton), the suspended solids load
is 7.84 kg/kkg (15.68 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 3.93
kg/kkg (7.86 lb/ton). The model plant developed for Subcategory A 7
is assumed to have separate discharge of process and non-contact
wastewater, in-plant gravity, separation, skimming, pH control, and
an oil recovery system for skimmed oil and water wastes.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 7-II - This alternative provides for the addition of pres-
surized air flotation utilizing chemical flocculating agents to en-
hance floe formation and floatability of wastes. Oil, water, and
solid waste skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil reclamation system
for dewatering, and recovery of inedible oils.
The resulting BOD waste load is 4.85 kg/kkg (9.70 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 2.35 kg/kkg (4.70 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load -.3
1.13 kg/kkg (2.26 lb/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $193,640
Total yearly cost: $ 4S.530
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 190. I~: li
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,2CO per acre). :t
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 69.8 oercerr.;
SS: 70.0 percent
O&G: 71.3 percent
890
-------
o
IL
O
IS
381.9
I.
z
t-H
I-
33'. .2
260.5
00
10
a
U
*—*
_l
H-
*-i
f
?''.£>
ee.co «i.ce
EFFICIENCY
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 190
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A7-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDR *A8TE!> ATEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0 PERCENT ROD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCHULESj
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
Bl..CONTROL HC-LSF
B...PUFFING STATION-
J...AIR FLOTATION
CONSTRICTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
2. PO^FR
3. CHEMICALS
«. *AIN'TFNANCE*SLPPLlES
TOTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY
2. YEARLY
OPERATING COST
INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
73300.00
10C30.00
10030.00
1936^0.00
2^*590.00
0.0
0. Of
357*0.00
35760.00
7750.00
6020.00
U9530.00
892
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 7-III - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 7-II complete mix activated sludge, secondary clarification,
sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration,
and a sludge holding tank. Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility
every ten days. The activated sludge unit also includes a control
house and two full-time operators.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.50 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.50 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.50 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $672,560
Total yearly cost: $151,370
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 191. It "is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.4 percer/c
SS: 96.8 percent
O&G: 93.6 percent
Alternative A 7-IV - This alternative provides ".:. ada-;t-.on ";c Altar-
native A 7-1II dual media pressure filtration with a .jmp sva'dor. to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.25 Ib/ton), tr.e jsperded
solids load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.25 Ib/ton), and the oil ar.d grea^ load is
0.051 kg/kkg (0.10 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $718,630
Total yearly cost: $164,520
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table IS . It -.s
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percert
SS: 98.4 percent
O&G: 98.7 percent
Alternative A 7-V - This alternative provides in ad.:,;icn tc AV:er-
native A 7-IV activated carbon adsorption before final diichcrge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.076 kg/kkg (G.",5 'Vtcr.), t:.e sjscsnded
solids load is 0.063 kg/kkg (0.13 Ib/ton), and tna c'/. and grease
is 0.025 kg/kkg (0.050 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: SI .,00- c/70
Total yearly cost: $ 2"i6,45'
895
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 191 .
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERtfAflVE A7-III
(EDIBLE OIL
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR *ASTE*ATER TKEA.TMiM CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 96.4 PERCENT BOD, REDUCTION'
TREATMENT MODULES» •.,. ,' V j '•
61..CONTROL HOiSE ;
B...PUMPING STATION '
J...AI* FLPT-ATI-C^
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...SLLDGE ThJC
S... VACUUM FTtTR
Y...HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSJ
1. CCNSTRLCTICN
2. LAND ' ' 73300.00
3. ENGINEERING ' d99iJO.CO
*1. CCNT I \GF NC Y a9::.
ICTAI i s.. i •»;. o o
894
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 192
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A7-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FCR ^APTE'> ATER T«t"AT!*tNT CHAl*
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.2 PERCENT «CP REC'jCTICN
TREATMENT MODULES:
PI..CONTROL HCLSE
e...PUMPING STATIC^
J...AIR FLGTATICN
K...ACTIVATED SLIOGE
C...SLLCGE T
K TANK
B... BUMPING STATION
*FDIA
INVESTMENT CCSTcj
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRICTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
a. CCNTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LABOR
2. POER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAIMTFNAN
TCTAL
FRTPA'N
537770.00
73300.00
53760.00
53780.00
718630.00
2/1990.00
55000.00
5530.00
179*0.00
103500.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY LPERATING COST 103500.00
2. YEARLY I^VPgTi^pKT
CCST PFCrv?»Y 2S75C.OC
3. CEPKECIATIHN 32270.00
TCTAL
895
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Tafc 16^193, It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ;($33, 200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99, 5> percent
SS: 99,2 percent .
O&G: : 99,4 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 273.
Alternative A 7-VI - This alternative provides vi,rv addition to Alter-
native A 7-1 1 an aerated lagoon and »s§ttl iiig
* '
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.50 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.50 lb/to*i)t and, the oil and grease load
is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.50 lb/ton).
>i ' -
Costs: Total investment cost: $607,720
Total yearly cost: $266, 550
*,
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 194. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: -BOD: '98.4 percent
SS: 96:;8 percent
O&G: ,93.6 percent
Alternative A 7-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 7-VI dual media pressure filtration and a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.25 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.25 lb/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.051 kg/kkg (0.10 lb/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $653,790
Total yearly cost: $279,680
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 195. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.4 percent
O&G: 98.7 percent
Alternative A 7-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 7-VII activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.076 kg/kkg (0.15 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.063 kg/kkg (0.13 lb/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.025 kg/kkg (0.050 lb/ton).
896
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 193
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A7-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FuP *ASTF*ATER TREATMENT C
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9V. 5 PERCENT BOO
TREATMENT MODULFSt
Bl.. CONTROL hCLSE
B...PU*PTMG STATIC*
J...AIR FLCMATICN
K. . .ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLLCGF THICKENER
Y... HALTING
?... PUMPING STATION
N...DUflL ^FCIA FRESSLRE
z. . . ACTIVATEP rafi^CN A :•
CCSTSI
1. CCM8TRUCTICM 77fc39G.OO
2 . LAND 7 3 3 0 0 . 0 C
3.
TCTAL 100«97(..00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS?
1. LABOR 2*9GO.OS
2. PC^ER 635^0. CO
3. CHEMICALS S530.C.1
4. MAI*TF.NANC£*SLPPLI£8 /sSelG.:*
TCTAL 12«s7C.;5
TCTAL VEARLY CCSTSS
1. YEARLY CPfeSATJ.Vf, ,-r;T -. ^ r 7C, . C 0
2. YfASLY I^•VFST^E^"
CCST PECTvERY - '. •;.-;.•
3. DEPfrECIATJO .-^-0. . '
TCTAL ^r-^,,-
897
-------
00
8
U.
O
2S
8
eti.e
71*.?
52T.C
es.ce ee.cc
EFFICIENCY
«s.cs
ICO.09
FIGURE 27?
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A?, ALTERNATIVES II THRU V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 194
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A7-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SL^MARY FOR HASTF*ATE» TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9P.« PERCFI^T BOO REDUCTION'
TREATMENT
P. 1..COMRGL KCUSF
B...PUMPIN'G STMICN
J...AIR FLOTATION'
L...AERATED LA6CPN
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1. •CCNSTfiuTTICN *87230.00
?. LAND feTSC.CO
3. E.KS1NEERIN6 ^8720. CO
a. CCNTIN'GENCY a8720.00
5. FVC LIN'E« 16270.00
TOTAL 607720.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LABOR 249SO.CO
I. PCnER • ' 16^250.00
3. CHEMICALS O.C
it. PAINTEfcANCE&Sl.PPLItS Pc^lO.OO
5. PVC L1KFR 7«O.OC
TCTAL 2 1 2 i <5 0 . 0 0
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTE:
1. YEARLY CPERATING CCST 2l?190.CO
2. YEARLY INVF5TKENT -
CCST RECOVERY 2^350.CO
3. DEPRECIATION 3C05C.CC
899
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 195
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A7-VI!
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEKIZED COST SlMMAHY FCR MSTEnATEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.., 9P.2 PERCENT 800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES;
Bl.. CONTROL sKL-S*:
P... PUMP ING STATIC'-
J...AIP PLOTATIC-N
L... AERATED LAGCCN-
B...PU
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. CONSTRICTION
? . L A N D fr 7 r. •-* « 0 C
3. ENGINEERING h25fcO«c:
5. PVC L1NFR J6r7o|c0
TCTAI 653790.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
i. LABOR
c. FOEP
3. CHEMICALS 0,-
41. ^AIMENAK-CE&5LPPL1?S • • ,' * -0 4 ' ^
TOTAL £-: > 5''. . :(?
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY CPf-RATI^G CCST t-c.. tcu r.
2. YE4RLY TNv
CCST PECCVEPY
3. Ot:PRECTATJO^
TOTAL
900
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $940,130
Total yearly cost: $331,620
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 196, It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.5 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.4 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 274.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Techno Iog4^s-
for Subcategory A 8 - Edible Oil Proces.si'nn hy r.aMsHc Rpfjninfy
Oil Processing, and Deodorization
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 8 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels
of waste reductions for the model plant which refines 454 kkg (500 ton)
of crude edible oil per day.
Alternative A 8-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no reduction
in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a 454 kkg
per day plant is 927 cu m (0.245 MG ) per day. The BOD waste load is
11.73 kg/kkg (23.46 lb/ton), the suspended solids load is 6.30 kg/kkg
(12.60 lb/ton), and the oil and grease load is 2.81 kg/kkg (5.62 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 8 is assumed to have separate
discharge of process and non-contact wastewaters, in-plant gravity sep-
aration, skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for the skim-
med oil and water wastes.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 8-II - This alternative provides pressurized air flotation
utilizing chemical flocculating agents to enhance floe formation and float-
ability of wastes. Oil, water, and solid waste skimmings are pumped to
an in-plant oil reclamation system for dewatering, and recovery of
inedible oils.
The resulting BOD waste load is 3.53 kg/kkg (7.06 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 1.90 kg/kkg (3,8 lb/ton), and the oil and grease load is
0.86 kg/kkg (1,72 lb/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $192,460
Total yearly cost: $ 49,060
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 197. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
901
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 196
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A7-VIII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN'
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.5 -PF«»CFNT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
Bl..CONTROL
B...PUMPING STATION
J...AJP FLOTATION
L...AERATED LAGOON
8...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL M.fCIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
z...ACTIVATED cARpr>
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
76«240.00
fe760.00
76420.00
7fea20.00
16270.00
940130.00
1. LAROR
2. FO'EK
3. CHfcMICALS
4. M.AINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
5. PVC LINER
TOTAL
24990.00
181070.00
0.0
40540.00
'740.00
247340.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 247.3^0.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 376io.oo
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL,
46670.00
331620.00
902
-------
us
o
oo
fe
|
1
CO
o
o
411.0 I
651.5
76?.0
581.0
SCa.O
Jla.S
225.0
135.5 C
«*,0 \T
toc.ce
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 274
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A? ALTERNATIVES VI THRU VIII
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 197
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A8-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SLMMAI-'Y FDR MSTE^ATt K TREATMENT CHAIN-
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0 PERCENT RL'D REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
B1..COTPCL HCLSF.
B...PUTINS STATION
J...AIP FLOTATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSs
1. CCNSTRLC • UN 1 02070.00
2. LAND 69970.00
3. ENGINEERING 10210.00
4. CONTINGENCY 10210.00
TCTAL 19ef60.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
1 . L APOR 2**99Q . 00
2. PCWER 3310.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
a, KAJNTEN'AMCR&SLPPLIES 69
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 69.9 percent
SS: 69.8 percent
O&G: 69.4 percent
Alternative A 8-111 - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 8-1I complete mix activated sludge, secondary clarif-
ication, sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum
filtration, and a sludge holding tank, Sludge is hauled to a landfill
facility every seven days. The activated sludge unit also includes
a control house and two full-time operators.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.20 kg/kkg (0.41 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.20 kg/kkg (0.41 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.20 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $585,720
Total yearly cost: $128,180
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 198. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.3 percent
SS: 96.8 percent
O&G: 96.4 percent
Alternative A 8-IV - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 8-III dual media pressure filtration with a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.20 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.20 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.041 kg/kkg (0.082 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $628,590
Total yearly cost: $140,210
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 199. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.1 percent
SS: 98.4 percent
O&G: 98.2 percent
Alternative A 8-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 8-IV activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.051 kg/kkg (0.10 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.051 kg/kkg (0.10 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.020 kg/kkg (0.040 Ib/ton).
905
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 198
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A8-III
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SIP-MARY FOR feASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9B.1 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
81..CONTROL HCLSE
B...PUKPING STATION
J...AIP FLOTATION
Y...HOLCIN6 TANK
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...SLUDGE THICKENER
S...VACIU* FILTRATION
Y. ..HOLi, INr' fA^K
LAND
INVESTMENT CC8TSI
1.
2.
3.
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
2. PCKE*
3. CHEMICfLS
MAINTENAN'CHSLPPLIES
TCTAL
429790.00
69970.00
429*0.00
42980.00
585720.00
24990.00
3^590.00
"100.00
15280.00
78960.00
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTS!
l. YEARLY OPERATING CCST 78960.oo
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY 23430.00
3. DEPRECIATION 25790.00
TOTAL
12B180.00
906
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 199
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A8-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.1 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESi
61,.CONTROL l-CLSF.
B...PUMPING STATION
J...AIP FLOTATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLUDGE THICKENER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...MOLTING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION'
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LA\n
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
i. LABOR
2. PCwER
3. CHfcMICALS
4. MA
TOTAL,
^65520.00
69970.00
46550.00
46550.00
628590.00
24990.00
42110.00
4100.00
15940.00
87140.00
TCTAU YEARLY CCSTSs
1. YEARLY
2. YEARLY
3.
OPERATING COST 87140.00
:CC. vF*v 25140.00
ATK-N 27930.00
140210.00
907
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $856,530
Total yearly cost: $183,240
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 200. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 275.
Alternative A 8-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 8-II (i.e., dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon in-
cluding a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.20 kg/kkg (0.41 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.20 kg/kkg (0.41 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.20 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $488,440
Total yearly cost: $206,100
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 201. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.3 percent
SS: 96.8 percent
O&G: 96.4 percent
Alternative A 8-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 8-VI dual media pressure filtration with a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.20 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.10 kg/kkg (0.20 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.041 kg/kkg (0.082 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $531,310
Total yearly cost: $218,140
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 202. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.1 percent
SS: 98.4 percent
O&G: 98.5 percent
908
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 200
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A8-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA8TEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl
B.
J.
Y.
K.
G.
S.
Y.
B.
N.
z.
CONTROL HCUSE
PUMPING STATION
AIR FLOTATION
HOLDING TANK
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
8LITGE THICKENER
VACUUM FILTRATION
HOLOING TANK
PUMPING STATION
DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
ACTIVATED C A R B 0 N A~D 8 OflFffC N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a,
CCNSTRvjCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLV OPERATING CCSTSt
i. LABOR
2. PCKER
3, CHEMICALS
a. MA1NTF.NANCE&SUPPL1ES
TC1AL
655460.00
69970.00
65550.00
65550.00
856530.00
24990,00
49140.00
4100,00
31420.00
109650.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 109650.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 34260.oo
3. DEPRFCIATION 39J30.00
TOTAL 1832*10.00
909
-------
«<7,C I
li.
O
in
en
o
UJ
o
124.6
««.S !»
/
) 73.to ?».ee T4.ee et.ce if.ee M.OO ti.oe ««.ee 97,00 iee.ee
EFFICIENCY •
FIGURE 27b
INVESTMEW ^C YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY As, .ALTERNATIVES II THRU V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 201
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A8-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDP l^STEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.3 PERCENT POD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULFSi
INVESTMENT COSTS)
1.
2.
3.
«.
5.
PI..CONTROL HCL8E
B...PUMPING STATION
J...A1P FETATION
L...AERATED LAGCCN
CCNSTRUCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LIKE*
391870.00
6000.00
39190.00
39190.00
12190.00
TCTAL
YEARLY OPFPATING COST3»
LABOR
POWER
24S90.00
119100.00
0.0
17750.00
600.00
1
? .
3.
a. MAINTENANCE8SLPPLIES
5. PVC LIN'FR
TOTAL
TCTAL YEARLY COSTS;
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 162440. 00
2. YEARLY INV
COST SECCVFRY
3. DtPPECTATJON
TOTAL
195^0.00
2«120.00
206100.00
911
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 202
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A8-VII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTEk TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.1 PFRCEM BCD DEDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
B1..CONTPCL KCLSE
B... PUMPING STATION '
J...AIR FLGTATTCM
L... AERATED LAfiCGN
R... PUMPING STATION
N...PUAL MEDIA PHESSURp FILTRA'N
CCSTSj ""
1. CCN'STRLCTICN "27600.00
2. LAND 6000.00
3. EN6INEFRING a27feO.OO
5. FVC LINFR I2l<50,0n
TC^AL 531310.0ft
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 2a990.00
2« P»EK 126620.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
a. PAINT-PNANCESSLPPLIES 1^^10.00
5. PVC LINER feOO.OO
TC
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 8-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 8-VIT activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0,051 kg/kkg (0,10 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0,051 kg/kkg (0,10 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.020 kg/kkg (0.040 Ib/ton),
Costs: Total investment cost: $759,220
Total yearly cost: $263,200
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 203. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 276.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategbry A 9 - Edible Oil Processing by Caustic Refining, Acidulation,
Oil Processing. Deodorization, and Shortening arid Table Oil Processing
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 9 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which refines
454 kkg (500 ton) of crude edible oil per day.
Alternative A 9-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 454 kkg per day plant is 1320 cu m (0.349 MG ) per day. The BOD
waste load is 17.12 kkg (34.24 Ib/ton), the suspended solids load is
8.68 kg/kkg (17.36 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 4.35 kg/kkg
(8.70 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 9 is assumed to have separate
discharge of process and non-contact wastewaters, in-plant gravity sep-
aration and skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for re-
el aimation of waste oil and grease skimmings.
Cost: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 9-11 - This alternative provides the addition of pres-
surized air flotation utilizing chemical flocculating agents to enhance
floe formation and floatability of wastes. Oil, water, and solid waste
skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil reclamation system for de-
watering, and recovery of inedible oils.
913
-------
T-iC.C
VD
W)
U.
O
O
O
Q.
<
O
TO. CO 73.10 7».OI 79. Of
(5.CC f8.CC «J.OC ««.CO «7,08 J8C.80
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE £76
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY As, ALTERNATIVES II AND VI THRU VII
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 203
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A8-VIII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR K'ASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT HODULESi
Bl.. CONTROL HCLSE
B... PUMP ING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
L... AERATED LAGOON
P.. .PUMPING STATION
N'...DUAL MF.CIA PRESSURE FUTRA'N
Z. ..ACTIVATED CARBON ADSCRPT.TO
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
.1.
2.
3.
«.
5.
CCNSTRLfTIO
LAND
ENGlNPERJKiG
CCNTINGFA'CY
f-VC LINER
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
i. LABOR
2. POER
3. CHfeMIC*LS
5. PVC LIN.E"
617530.00
6000.00
61750.00
61750.00
12190.00
75
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 5.15 kg/kkg (10.30 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 2.62 kg/kkg (5.24 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 1.31 kg/kkg (2:62 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $201,480
Total yearly cost: $ 50,560
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 204. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 70.0 percent
SS: 70.0 percent
O&G: 70.0 percent
Alternative A 9-111 - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 9-11 complete mix activated sludge, secondary clarification,
sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration,
and a sludge holding tank. Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility
every nine days. The activated sludge unit also includes a control
house and two full-time operators.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.52 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.52 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.26 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $694,590
Total yearly cost: $157,600
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 205. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.0 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 9-IV - This alternative provides with the addition of
Alternative A 9-III dual media pressure filtration with a pump station
to generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.26 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.26 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.058 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $743,140
Total yearly cost: $171,620
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 206. It is assumed
that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
916
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 204
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A9-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR M8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0 PERCENT BCD RtDUCTICN
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl..CON:TRnL HCL'SE
3...PUMPING STATION
J...AIG FLOTATION
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1. rCNSTRL-ClICK 104050.00
2. LAND 76630.PO
3. ENGINEERING ICUOO.OO
&. CONTINGENCY 10400.00
TCTAL 20H80.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LABOR
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
a. r-AINTENANCERSLPPLlES 7020.00
TCTAL 36260.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 36260.00
CCS) RFCPVERV 8060.00
3. CtPRECIATION 62^0.00
TOTAL 50560.00
917
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 205
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A9.-III
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 96.5 PERCENT SOD REDUCTION'
TREATMENT MODULE'S!
Bl
B,
J.
K.
G.
S.
Y.
,CONTROL HCUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.AIR FLOTATION'
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
CCNSTPLCTICN
LAND
CCMTIK1EMCY
TCTAl
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSt
1. LABOR
?. PCWER
3. CHEMICALS
a. MAINTENANCE18UPPLIES
TCTAl;
TCTAL Y&ARLY CCSTSl
i. YEARLY CPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST Wl-COVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TrTAL
51^960,00
76630.00
51500.00
51500.00
694590.00
24990.00
50340.00
5830,00
17760.00
99920.00
98920.00
27780.00
30900.00
157600.00
918
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 206
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A9-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR i«ASTEkATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.P PFRCFM BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESt
R1..CDMPCL HCLSF
P. ..PUMPING STATIC*
J...AIR FLCTATICK'
K... ACTIVATES SLUDGE
C... SLUDGE THICKENER
S... VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLCI^ TANK
B... PUMPING STATION
PRESSURE
FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
CC^3TRUCTIC^
LAND
3.
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LA6HR
2. HGIfER
3. CHEMICALS
a. VA
TCTAL
TGTAL YEARLY CCSTSI
i. VEARLY OPERATING CCST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECCVFRV
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
555430.00
766*0.00
55540.00
55540.00
743140.00
24990.00
59230.00
5830.00
18510.00
108560.00
108560.00
29730.CO
33330.00
171620.00
919
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 98.6 percent
Alternative A 9-V - This alternative provides with the addition of
Alternative A 9-IV activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0,073 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.073 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.029 kg/kkg (0.058 Ib/ton),
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,075,830
Total yearly cost: $ 229,000
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 207. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 277.
Alternative A 9-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 9-II (i.e., dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon system
including a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.52 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.52 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.26 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $684,150
Total yearly cost: $305,590
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 208. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.0 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 9-VII - This alternative provides with the addition of
Alternative A 9-VI dual media pressure filtration with a pump station
to generate a sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.26 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.26 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.058 kg/kkg (0.13 Ib/ton).
920
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 207
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A9-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SLMVARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT
Bl
B.
J.
K.
0.
s.
Y.
6.
N.
CONTROL HCL8E
PUM.PING STATION
AIR FLOTATICN
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
SLUDGE THICKENER
VACLUK FILTRATION
HOLCING TANK
PUMPING STATION
DUAL KEDIA PRESSURE
AC1IVAT6C CAR8O
PILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
u
2.
3,
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINFfcRING
«. CONTINGENCY.
TCTAL
8326*0,00
76630.00
83270.00
83270,00
1075830,00
TCTAL
DPF.RATING CCSTSi
1. LABOR 2a9
-------
MD
ro
ro
10
Ct
d
o
u.
o
V)
o
o
_1
^
h-l
Q.
97J.il
7»«.2
56J.!
357.
•52.6
a
73
C
?;.so 73.00 7».cc 79.c: «2,o: es.ec ee.co «j,cc <«.co «7.oo 100.00
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 277
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A9, ALTERNATIVE II THRUUGH V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 208
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A9-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT ROD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES}
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Bl.,CONTROL HCLSE
P...PIPPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION1
I...AERATED LACCfN
CCNSTRLCHCN
L A\D
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
COSTS:
LABOR
CHEMICALS
VAINTENANCERSLPPLIES
PVC LTKFP
TOTAL
5^7730.00
7830.00
54770.00
54770.CO
19050.00
24990,
193820,
C,
00
00
0
2^730.00
860.00
244400.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS*
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 244400.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST HECCVgfiY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL 305590.00
27370.
33620.
00
00
923
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $732,710
Total yearly cost: $319,590
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 209, It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 98.6 percent
Alternative A 9-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 9-VII activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.073 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.073 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.029 kg/kkg (0.058 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,065,380
Total yearly cost: $ 376,990
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 210. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 278.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 10, Edible Oil Production by Caustic Refining, Oil Processing,
Deodorization, and Shortening and Table Oil Production
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 10 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives.
In Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being applicable
engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various
levels of waste reductions for the model plant which refines 454 kkg
(500 ton) of crude edible oil per day.
Alternative A 10-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 454 kkg per day plant is 1101 cu m (0.291 MG) per day. The BOD
waste load is 12.76 kg/kkg (25.52 Ib/ton), the suspended solids load
is 7.14 kg/kkg (14.28 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 3.23 kg/kkg
(6.46 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 10 is assumed to have sep-
arate discharge of process and non-contact wastewaters, in-plant gravity
924
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 209
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A9-VII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SLM^APY FOR w*STF> ATE» TREATMENT
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.2 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
PI..CONTROL >-CLSE
P...PUMPING STATION:
J...AIR FLOTATION
L...AERATED LAC-CCN
B...PUMPING STATION
N...DUM MFI516 PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CTNSTRICTTCK
LAND
FK'GINFFPJNG
PVC
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
3. LABOR
3. CHEMICALS
5. PVC LTNEW
Tf.TAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
2. YEARLY
CCST
3. Ct
TCTAL
5R8190.00
7830.00
58820,00
58820.00
19050.00
732710.00
2^990.00
202720.00
0.0
25470.00
860.00
CCS" 254040.00
29310.00
36240.00
319590.00
925
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 210
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A9-VIH
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HA8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESj
81..CONTROL HCISE
B... PUPPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
L...AERATED LAGCON
B...PULPING STATION
N...OUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
Z...ACTIVATED CAR8C.M AOSCHPTTGN-
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1. CONSTRUCTION 865a20.00
2. LAND 7830.00
3. ENGINEERING 865^0.00
a. CONTINGENCY 86540.00
5. PVC LINER 1^050.00
TCTAL 1065380.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABCP 24990,00
2. PCWER 2l2a50.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
«. MAJNTENANCERSLPPLIES a3l90.00
5. PVC LINER 860.00
TCTAL 28U90.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSI
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 281490,00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECrvEPV i»?fe20.00
i. DFPKECIATICN 52800.00
TOTAL 376990.00
926
-------
ro
tfl
_
O
(ft
o
-O
>-
>-
u
7c.cc n.eo 7«.oe 7«.:e ez.s: tt.eo te.ce fi.co i».eo 97.30 icc.ee
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 278
INVESTMENT AM) YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A9. ALT. II AND VI THRUUGM VIII
-------
DRAFT
separation and skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for
reclamation of waste oil and grease skimmings.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 10-11 - This alternative provides for the addition of
pressurized air flotation utilizing chemical flocculating agents to
enhance floe formation and floatablHty of wastes. Oil, water, and
solid waste skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil reel almation
system for dewaterlng, and recovery of inedible oils.
The resulting BOD waste load is 3.82 kg/kkg (7.64 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 2.18 kg/kkg (4,36 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.95 kg/kkg (1.89 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $191,780
Total yearly cost: $ 49,200
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 211. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 70.0 percent
SS: 69.5 percent
O&G: 70.0 percent
Alternative A 10-111 - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 10-11, complete mix activated sludge, secondary clarification,
sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration,
and a sludge holding tank. Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility
every six days. The activated sludge unit also includes a control
house and two full-time operators.
i t '.A
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.19 kg/kkg (0.39 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.22 kg/kkg (0.44 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.097 kg/kkg (0.19 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $600,850
Total yearly cost: $133,730
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 212. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 96.9 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 10-IV - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 10-11I dual media pressurized filtration with a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
928
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 211
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE AlO-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SLM^ABY FOR toASTE^ATER THEATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 7ft.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES;
PI..CONTROL HCLSE
B...PUHPINB STATION
J...AIP FLOTATION
INVESTMENT COSTS*
1, CCNSTRljCTTO
2. LAND
3. ENGINEKPiNG
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
2.
3.
a. M
TTTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSf
1. YEARLY CPEPATUG COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST ^FCCVFPY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
73300.00
Q670.Cn
S870.00
191780.00
3730.00
0.0
6690.00
35610.no
35610.00
7670,00
5920.00
U9200.00
929
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 212
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A10-III
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED CCST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT 30D REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCCULESj
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSI
1. LABOR
2. PCKER
B1..CQNTRCL HCl'SE
B...PUVPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
5...SLLDGE THICKENER
s...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y... HOLDING TA^K
CCKSTPL'CTIGM
LAND
ENGINEERING
3. CHEMICALS
fl. WAIMTENANCE4SIPPLIES
TCTAL YEARLY
TCTAL
CCSTS!
1. YtARLY CPERATING
2. YEARLY JWEST^EK
CCST RECCVEKY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
"39630.00
73300.00
43960.00
600850.00
24990.00
38380.00
4340.00
15610.CO
83320.00
CCST 83320.00
24030.00
26380.00
133730.00
930
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD vaste load is 0.097 kg/kkg (0.19 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.11 kg/kkg (0.22 lb/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.048 kg/kkg (0.096 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $646,270
Total yearly cost: $146,640
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 213. It is
assumed that land costs $82S040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 98.5 percent
Alternative A 1Q-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alternative
A 10-IV activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.048 kg/kkg (0.096 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.056 kg/kkg (0.11 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.024 kg/kkg (0.048 lb/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $919,530
Total yearly cost: $199,530
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 214. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.2 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 279.
Alternative A 10-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 10-11 (i.e., dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon and
a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.19 kg/kkg (0.39 lb/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.22 kg/kkg (0.44 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.097 kg/kkg (0.19 lb/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $600,480
Total yearly cost: $262,740
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 215. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
931
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 213
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A10-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOH h'ASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.2 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESi
81..CONTROL HCLSE
B... PUMPING STATION
J...AIS FLOTATICN
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLLDGE TNICKFNER
s...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
CCNSTRLCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LA60*
£. POEK
3. CHEMICALS
H. MAINTENANCE&SLFPLIES
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEAPLY OPERATING CCST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST REC.CVFRY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
477470.00
73300.00
47750.00
47750.00
646270.00
24990.00
46500.00
4340.00
16310.00
92140.00
92)40.00
25850.00
2P65C.OO
146640.00
932
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 214
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A10-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTF>ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT 800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
B1..CUMTRCL HOUSE
8...PULPING STATIC**
J...AIR FLOTATION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...SLLDGE THICKENER
s...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...P';MPIN6 STATION
N...r>uAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
Z...ACTIVATED CARBON 4
INVESTMENT CCSTfif
1. CONSTRUCTION
2. LAND
4. CCNTTNGSNCY
TOTAL
YEAPLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LAPHM
£ • ' L, '• t •
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAI
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCST5:
1. YEAPLY
2. YEAPLV TKVFS'
COST HECCvFW
3. TEPRECTATIPK
TOTAL
705190.00
73300.00
70520.00
70520.00
919530.00
27U90,00
5^700.00
«3flO.CO
33910.00
120440.CO
120^40.00
3fc7fiO.OO
42310.00
199530.00
933
-------
02C.O
VO
GO
-F=>
Q:
o
Q
b
w
§
<
U)
h-
z
o
o
Q
<
U
Q.
<
U
n.cc *e.cc «i.oe ««.cc 97.00 ico.oo
a
33
3=>
FIGURE 279
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY Aio, ALT. I;I THROUGH V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 215
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A10-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SLMN-ARY FOR KASTEMTFP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PfcRCF.NT ROD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESi
61..n:\TRCl. HCLSF.
p...PULPING STATION
J...AIB FLPTATICN
L...AERATED
INVESTMENT CCSTSJ
1.
2. LAND 7000.00
3. ENGINEERING 48120.00
U. COTlNGENCY 4 8 1 ? 0 . 0 ft
5. FVC LINES . 16010.00
TCTAL 600480.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSJ
1. LA8C» 24990.00
2. POFR 161970.00
3. C*"FMirALs 0.0
4. ^•AI^iTE^'A^CF8.Sl.PFLIES 21360.00
5. ?VC L^FR 710.00
•TCT*u. 209050.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY CPERATING CCST 209050.00
2 . YEARLY I N v P; S T I" F \ T
CCST RECCvFHY 2^020,00
3. DEPRECIATION 29670.00
TCTAL 262740.00
935
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98,5 percent
SS: 96.9 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 1Q-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 10-VI dual media pressurized filtration with a pump station
to generate a sufficient head for filter operatton.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.097 kg/kkg (0.19 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.11 kg/kkg (0.22 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.048 kg/kkg (0.096 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $645,910
Total yearly cost: $275,650
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 216. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 98.5 percent
Alternative A 10-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 10-VII activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.048 kg/kkg (0.096 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.056 kg/kkg (0.11 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.024 kg/kkg (0.048 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $919,160
Total yearly cost: $326,050
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 217. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acrfe). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.2 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 280.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 11, Edible Oil Processing By Caustic Refining. Acidulation.
Oil Processing, and Deodorization. and this Production of Shortening.'
TableOils, and Margarine
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 11 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives.
In Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being applicable
engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various
936
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 216
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A10-VII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST 8LM*ARY F»R M5TEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.2 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREAT^FNT MODULE!*!
CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
5.
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS*
i. LABOR
P1..CCMRC-L HCLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
L...Afc.Ri*TED LA6CON
B..,Pl'N'PTNS STATION'
MEDIA PRESSURE ?ILTRA«N
519080.00
7000.00
51910.00
51910,00
16010.00
645910.00
24990.00
170090.00
0,0
22070.00
710.00
217860.00
CCNSTRICTICK
LAND
EN6INEEPING
CCNTIN6ENCY
PVC LTNFR
3. CHEMICALS
5. PVC
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY
resist
1. ''PARLY CDESATIKG COST 217860.00
?.. YMPIY INVESTMENT
CCST RFCCVERY 258«0,00
3. OF.Pfi?CIATIOK 31950,00
TTTAi. . 275650.00
937
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 217
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A10-VIII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BOD SEDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES;
Bl
8.
J.
I.
8.
N
z.
..CONTROL
.0PUMPING
HCLSE
STATION
..AIR FLOTATION
..AERATED LAPCCN
..oPUMPING STATION'
...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
ACTIVATED CARBLiv ADSCRPTK-
INVESTMENT COSTSr
1.
2.
3.
a.
5.
CCNSTSUCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATINC-
1.
2.
3.
a.
5.
COSTS:
LABOR
POER
CHt^ICALS
KAINTENAKCEiSLPPLlES
PVC LINEP
7Ufc790.00
7000.00
7^680.00
7^680.00
16010.00
,00
,00
,0
,00
0
39680
TOTAL
710.00
243670.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCST8»
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 2a3670.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 36770.00
3. DEPRECIATION 45610.00
TOTAL 326050.00
938
-------
o
Q
b
V)
(0
8
92?.C
63*.*
7J15.J
657.8
S7C.8
73.
?«.cc
e^.o: ee.ce
EFFICIENCY
-------
DRAFT
levels of waste reductions for the model plant which refines 454 kkg
(500 ton) of crude edible oil per day.
Alternative A 11-I - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 454 kkg per day plant is 1574 cu m (0.416 MG) per day. The BOD
waste load is 20.57 kg/kkg (41.14 Ib/ton), the suspended solids load
is 10.98 kg/kkg (21.96 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 9.95 kg/kkg
(19.90 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory All is assumed to have sep-
arate discharge of process and non-contact wastewaters, in-plant gravity
separation and skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for re-
clamation of waste oil and grease skimmings.
Cost: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 11-11 - This alternative provides for the addition of
pressurized air flotation utilizing chemical flocculating agents to
enhance floe formation and floatability of wastes. Oil, water, and
solid waste skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil reclamation system
for dewatering, and recovery of inedible oils.
The resulting BOD waste load is 6.14 kg/kkg (12.28 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 3.33 kg/kkg ( 6.66 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 2.92 kg/kkg (5.84 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $215,730
Total yearly cost: $ 52,410
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 218. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 70.1 percent
SS: 69.7 percent
O&G: 70.6 percent
Alternative A 11-III - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 11-11 complete mix activated sludge, secondary clarification,
sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration,
and a sludge holding tank. Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility
every eight days. The activated sludge unit also includes a control
house and two full-time operators.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.31 kg/kkg (0.62 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.35 kg/kkg (0.70 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.30 kg/kkg (0.60 Ib/ton).
940
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 218
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE All-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST StVMAKY FOR kASTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
INVESTMENT CCSTSJ
1.
2.
3.
0.
El..CONTROL MCLSE
8...PUMPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION'
CONSTRICTION
LANP
CCNTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
1. LABOR
2. POER
3. CI-EMI
a. .MAINTCNANCE&8LPPLIE8
TCTAL
CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY CPE*ATI\>G CCST
e. NcARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECCVF.ftY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
TCTAL -YEARLY
1131*10.00
79970.00
11310.00
11310.00
215730.00
20990.00
4600.00
0.0
7160.00
36990.00
36990.00
8630.00
6790.00
52010.00
941
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $761,790
Total yearly cost: $175,830
An Itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 219. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.2 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 11-IV - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A ll-III dual media pressure filtration with a pump station
to generate a sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.31 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.17 kg/kkg (0.35 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $813,980
Total yearly cost: $191,110
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 220. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.4 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
Alternative A 11-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 11-IV activated carbon adsorption before final discharge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.076 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.087 kg/kkg (0.17 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,214,140
Total yearly cost: $ 256,440
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 221. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 281.
942
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 219
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE All-Ill
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUHMAPY FOP ^ASTEv-.ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... «»8.? PERCENT POD REDUCTION
MCCULESi
PI..CONTROL NOISE
B...PUMPI*'P STATION
J...AI* FLOTATION
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...SLLDGE ThICKFNEh
S...VACKIK FILTRATION
Y... HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT C03TSI
1. CCNSTBlCTICN
2. LAND
3. ENGINEERING
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATES CCSTS:
1. LABOR
2. PC<*E«
3. CHEMICALS
4. K!AI
TOTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCETSt
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECrvFSY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
5&8180.00
56820,00
56820.00
761790.00
599^0,00
6980.00
19360.00
111270.00
111270000
30470.00
3^090.00
175830.00
943
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 220
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE All-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SLMMA*V FUR fcASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN.
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 221
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A11-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WASTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESI
Bl
o
.CONTROL HOUSE
.PUMPING STATIC^
.AIR FLOTATION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLI.DGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA«N
.ACTIVATED CARBON"
INVESTMENT CC8TSI
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
945150.00
79^70.00
94S10.00
94510,00
1214140.00
YEARLY OPFRATING COSTS?
1. LABOR 2^990.00
2. PC^F.R 81200.00
3. CHEMICALS 6980.00
4. ^AINTENANCERSLPPLIES 37990,00
TCTAL 151160.00
YEARLY COSTS l
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 151160,00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY 48570,00
3. DEPRECIATION- 56710.00
TCTAL 256440.00
945
-------
1 2 I'.. C
vo
-(^
cr>
O
Q
b
co
8
u
O
»2.;o es.ce es.oc. 9i.ce ««.oo 97. oo 100.00
?-:.:; TJ.CC t«.e:
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 281
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY All, ALTERfNATIVES U THRUUGH V
o
73
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 111-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 11-11 (i.e., dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon
system including a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.31 kg/kkg (0.62 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.35 kg/kkg (0.70 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.30 kg/kkg (0.60 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total inbestment cost: $768,500
Total yearly cost: $353,770
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented In Table 222. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.2 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 11-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 11-VI dual media pressure filtration with a pump station to
generate a sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.31 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.17 kg/kkg (0.35 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.069 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $820,670
Total yearly cost: $369,050
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 223. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.4 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
Alternative A 11-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 11-VII activated carbon adsorption prior to final discharge to
navigable waters.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.076 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.087 kg/kkg (0.17 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.035 kg/kkg (0.070 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,220,850
Total yearly cost: $ 434,380
947
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 222
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE All-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SlMf*ARY FOP HASTEMTER TREATMENT .CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl..CONTROL HOLSE
P...PUKPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
(....AERATED LAGOON
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC
INVESTMENT COSTSt
1.
2.
3.
s!
TOTAL
YFARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LABOR
3! CHEMICALS
a. i
5. .
T C T A'.
61U660.00
6660.00
6U70.00
61470.00
22240.00
768500.00
80990.00
230770.00
0.0
26260.00
1020.00
265040.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
i. YFARLY OPERATING COST 285040.oo
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
crsT RECOVERY 30740.00
3. DEPRECIATION 37990.00
TOTAL 353770.00
948
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 223
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE All-VII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTE*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.2 PERCEM BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
El..CONTROL HCLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
L.,.AERATED LAGCCN
B...PULPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA FRE8SLRE FRTRA'K
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3,
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LIKE"
TOTAL.
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
i. LABOR
2. PCfcER
3. CHEMICALS
a.
5.
MAINTENANCER5LPPLIES
FVC L
658150.00
8660.00
65810.00
65810.00
222UO.OO
820670.00
2^990.00
240550.00
0.0
29060.00
1020.00
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY
CCSTS!
1. YEARLY CPEP«TIK6 CCST 295620.00
2. YEARLY IKVFSTfENT
CCST RECOVERY 32830.oo
3. OEPRFCIATIO11 40600,00
TOTAL 369050.00
949
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 224. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 282.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategory A 12, Edible Oil Processing by Caustic Refining.,
Oil Processing, and Deodorization, and the Production of-Shortening,
Table Oils,_and Margarine . .._
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 12 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels
of waste reductions for the model plant which refines 454 kkg (500 ton)
of edible oil per day.
Alternative A 12-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 454 kkg per day plant is 1355 cu m (0.358 MG) per day. The BOD
waste load is 16.20 kg/kkg (32.40 Ib/ton), the suspended solids
load is 9.44 kg/kkg (18.88 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is
8.83 kg/kkg (17.66 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 12 is assumed to have
separate discharge of process and non-contact wastewaters, in-plant
gravity separation and skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery
system for reclamation of waste oil and grease skimmings.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 12-11 - This alternative provides for the addition of
pressurized air flotation utilizing chemical flocculating agents to
enhance floe formation and floatability of wastes. Oil, water, and
solid waste skimmings are pumped to an in~plant oil reclamation
system for dewatering, and recovery of inedible oils.
The resulting BOD waste load is 4.84 kg/kkg (9.68 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 2.87 kg/kkg (5.74 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 2.69 kg/kkg (5.38 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $202,970
Total yearly cost: $ 50,800
950
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 224
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE All-VIII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SIMHARY FOR I«AS7FMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESj
81..CONTROL HCtSE
B...PUMPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
L. ..AERATEH LAGOON
P.O.PULPING STATION
N...DUAL ^EOIA PRESSURE F!LT»A'N
2... ACTIVATE!." CASPCK /uES
INVESTMENT COSTS«
1. CONSTRUCTION 991630.00
2. LAND 8660,00
3. ENGTMF.ERING 99160.00
4. CONTINGENCY 99160.00
5. PVC LINFR 22240.00
TOTAL 1220850,00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR ' 2^990.00
2. PO^Ef 252020«00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
«. i^AlNTF.NANCERSLPPLltS «6910000
5. PVC LU-EW 1020000
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING CCST
2. YEARLY IWVEST^EN'T
CCST RECOVERY a8830.00
3. DEPRECIATION 60610.00
TCTAL
951
-------
vo
en
ro
V)
QL
b
o
*•*
<
I—I
a
1221.0
1103.
«2.t: f5.ee ee.cs
EFFICIENCY
«1.C8 <«.00 «T,00 100.CO
FIGURE 282
INVESTMEW AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY All. ALTERNATIVES II AND VI THROUGH VIII
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 225. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 70.1 percent
SS: 69.6 percent
O&G: 69.5 percent
Alternative A 12-1II - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 12-11 complete mix activated sludge, secondary clarification,
sludge recirculattng pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration,
and a sludge holding tank. Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility
every five days. The activated sludge unit also includes a control
house and two full-time operators.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/kkg (0.48 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.29 kg/kkg (0.57 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.27 kg/kkg (0.54 Ib/ton)
Costs: Total investment cost: $672,950
Total yearly cost: $152,640
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 226. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre).
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.0 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 12-IV - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 12-111 dual media pressure filtration with a pump station to
generate a sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.12 kg/kkg (0.24 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.14 kg/kkg (0.29 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.060 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $722,000
Total yearly cost: $166,810
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 227. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.3 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
Alternative A 12-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 12-IV activated carbon adsorption before final discharge to
navigable waters.
953
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 225
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A12-II
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ktASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 70.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT *CDULES|
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
u.
Bl..CONTROL HCLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
CCNSTRLCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
CCNTINGEMCV
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS!
1. LABOR
2. PCKEH
3. CHEMICALS
4. MINTENAN'CE&SL'FPLIES
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
1052SO.OO
76630.00
10530.00
10530.00
202970.00
.00
.00
0.0
7040.00
36360.00
36360.00
8120.00
6320.00
50800.00
954
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 226
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A12-III
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FC* fASTEMTER TREAT^tNT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT POO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MOOULESj
Bl..CONTROL hCLSE
B...PUfPI"G STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION'
K...ACTIVATED SLLDGE
&...SLUG* TUCKFKER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
V...HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSt
1. LABOR
e. PCfcER
3. CHEMICALS
4. hAINTf MANrF.&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY COATING COST
2. YEARLV INVESTMENT
COST HECCVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
76630.00
^9690.00
49690.00
672950.00
2^990
^6150
00
00
5490.00
17270.00
95900.00
95QOO.OO
1 5 2 6 a 0 . 0 0
955
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 227
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A12-IV
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WA5TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MGOULESi
61
B.
J.
.CONTROL
C.
s.
Y
e
N
HCLSE
STATION
.AlH FLOTATION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.8LLDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
...HOLDING TANK
...PUMPING STATION
...DUAL MFQIA PRESSURE
FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
CONSTRUCTION
2. LAND
3. ENGINEERING
«. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
1. LABOR
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINUNANCE&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTS?
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
537810.00
76630.00
53780.00
53780.00
722000.00
00
00
00
57160.
5490.
18020.00
105660.00
105660.00
26660.00
32270.00
166610.00
956
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.060 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton), the suspended
soltds load is 0.072 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.03 kg/kkg (0.06 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,063,760
Total yearly cost: $ 225,270
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 228. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 283.
Alternative A 12-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 12-11 (i.e., dissolved air flotation) an aerated lagoon
system including a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/kkg (0.48 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.29 kg/kkg (0.57 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.27 kg/kkg (0.54 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $706,850
Total yearly cost: $319,260
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 229. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.0 percent
O&G: 97.0 percent
Alternative A 12-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 12-VI dual media pressure filtration and a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.12 kg/kkg (0.24 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.14 kg/kkg (0.29 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.060 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $755,880
Total yearly cost: $333,450
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 230. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
957
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 228
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A12-V
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMAKY FQ° UiASTE^ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
81.. CONTROL HCLSE
B... PUMPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLIDGS TUCXENER
S... VACUUM FILTRATION
Y... HOLD ING TANK
B... PUMPING STATION
N...DU4L Mfr.jA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
2. .. ACTIVATES CA.R»C.\- i
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1. CC.N8TRUCTIGK 622610.00
2. LAND 76630. oo
3. ENGINEERING 82260.00
4. CCNTINGENCY «2260.00
TCTAL 1063760.00
YEARLY OPERATING
1. LABCR 24990.00
2. PC!*ER 67130.00
3. CHEMICALS 5UQC.OO
*. MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES 35750.00
TCTAL 133360.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY CPERATING COST 133360.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 42550.00
3. DEPRECIATION U9360.00
TCTAL 2P5270.00
958
-------
UD
Ol
V)
b
1
|
z
io
o
o
at.
.4
861.2
7S9.8
65S.S
557.0
S5H.2
151.a
70.00 71.CO 74.00 7«.IO 82.CC 85.CC 68.00 «1.50 SS.CO 97.00 iCO.CO
EFFICIENCY
o
•yo
FIGURE 283
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY Ai2, ALTERNATIVES II THROUGH V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 229
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A12-VI
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST Sl'MMAHY'FCR is'ASTE^ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT. BCD REDUCTION'
TREATMENT MODULESi
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
01..CONTROL hCLSF
B...PL^Pl!vG STATION
J...AIR FLOTATICN
L...AERATcD LAGOON
'CONSTRUCTION'
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC L
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LABOR
2.
3.
4.
5. PVC LINER
TCTAL
565780.00
8000.00
56580.00
56580.00
1
-------
DARFT
TABLE 230
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A12-VII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FQR HASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3 PERCENT POO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
til..CONTROL HCLS'E
6...PIMPING STATION
J...AIR FLOTATION
L...AERATED LAGCCN
B...PUMPING STATION
N...OUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT
1. CONSTRUCTION
2. LAND
5. PVC L.TNE*
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSj
1. LABOR
3. CHEMICALS
TOTAL YEARLY
5. PVC LINER
TCTAL
COSTS;
1. YEARLY LPERATING CCST
Z. YEARLY I*VEST.VE\T
CCST RECCVF«Y
3.
TCTAL
606650.00
6000.00
60660.00
60660.00
19
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.3 percent
SS: 98.5 percent
O&G: 99.3 percent
Alternative A 12-VIII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 12-VII activated carbon adsorption before final discharge to
navigable waters.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.060 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.072 kg/kkg (0.14 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.030 kg/kkg (0.060 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,097,630
Total yearly cost: $ 391,900
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 231. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.6 percent
SS: 99.2 percent
O&G: 99.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 284.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
f or' yuRa tegory~A 13. Plastlclz"ing~and' Packagih~g""oT Margarine
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 13 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, six alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels
of waste reductions for the model plant which processes 227 kkg (250 ton)
of margarine per day.
Alternative A 13-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 227 kkg per day plant is 340 cu m (0.09 MG ) per day. The BOD waste
load is 3.92 kg/kkg (7.84 Ib/ton), the suspended solids load is 2.72 kg/kkg
(5.44 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 5.81 kg/kkg (11.62 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 13 is assumed to have sep-
arate discharge of process and non-contact wastewaters, in-pi ant gravity
separation and skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for re-
clamation of waste oil and grease skimmings.
Cost: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 13-11 - This alternative provides for the addition of
pressurized air flotation utilizing chemical flocc./sating agents to
enhance floe formation and floatafaility of wastes. Chi, water, and solid
962
-------
DARFT
TABLE 231
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A12-VIII
(EDIBLE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZFD COST SUMMARY FOR WA3TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.6 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
91
8.
J.
L.
8.
N.
Z.
.CONTROL HOUSE
.PUMPING STATION
,AJR FLOTATION
.AERATED LAGOON
.PULPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2..
3.
<40
5,
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
891440.00
6000.00
89140.00
89i4o.oo
19910.00
1097630.00
DEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
1. LABOR 24990.00
2. PCKF.R 223770.00
3, CHEMICALS ' 0.0
«. KAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES 43870.00
So PVC LINER 880.00
7CTAL 293510.00
TCTAL YEARLY
CCSTSI
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 293510.00
20 YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST PFCOVERY 43910,00
38 DEPRECIATION 54480.00
TCTAL 391900.00
963
-------
in
g
u
>-
*•*
>-
_l
«.ee ei.ee
EFFICIENCY
«t.ce ««.eo
jeo.oo
FIGURE 284
INVESTMEm" AND YEARLY COST FOR SUBCATEGORY Al2, ALTERNATIVES II AND VI THROUGH VIJI
vm
-------
DRAFT
waste skimmings are pumped to an in-plant oil reclamation system
for dewatering, and recovery of inedible oils.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.17 kg/kkg (2.34 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.81 kg/kkg (1.62 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 1.75 kg/kkg (3.50 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $146,540
Total yearly cost: $ 42,720
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 232. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 70.1 percent
SS: 70.1 percent
O&G: 70.0 percent
Alternative A 13-111 - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 13-11 complete mix activated sludge, secondary clarification,
sludge recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration,
and a sludge holding tank. Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility
every 20 days. The activated sludge unit also includes a control house
and two full-time operators.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.060 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.075 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.075 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $295,200
Total yearly cost: $ 70,200
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 233. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.2 percent
O&G: 98.7 percent
Alternative A 13-IV - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 13-1II dual media pressure filtration and a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.03 kg/kkg (0.06 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.037 kg/kkg (0.074 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.037 kg/kkg (0.074 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $327,930
Total yearly cost: $ 79,280
965
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 232
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A13-II
(MARGARINE PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST St«MRV FUR *ASTEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,.. 70.0 PERCENT POD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
BI..COK-TPCL HCLSF
e...PUMPING STATION
J...AIW FLOTATION
INVF.STMEM CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
FK'GIN'EEPIKG
«. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSs
1. LABOR
3*. CHEMICALS
4. VA
TOTAL YEARLY
TOTAL
COSTS:
1. YFARLY OPERATING
2. VEAPLY IN'VF
CCST PECCVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
72150.00
59970.
7210.
00
00
7210.00
U6540.00
'.00
1570.00
0.0
5970.00
32530.CO
CCST 32530.00
58*0.00
"330.00
966
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 233
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A13-III
(MARGARINE PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED CC3T SIMMARY POP "ASTFMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULEfi
61 ..CONTROL HCLSE
8. ..PUVKlMG STATION
J...AIR PLOTATICN
K... ACTIVATED SLUOGe.
C...SLLCGE THICKENER
Y...HCLrUr- TANK
CCNSTRLCTICK
LAND
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
TCTiL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LA BO*
£. I-C^EK
3. CHEMICALS
4. PAINTENAMCE&SLPPLIES
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTS!
i. YEARLY CPEPATING CCST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CC.S1 RECCVERY
3. C
TCTAL
196030.00
59970.00
19600.00
19600.00
£95200.00
2«990.00
9690.00
2080.00
9870.00
46630.OC
4*6630.00
11 fl'l 0.00
11760.00
70200.00
967
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 234, U is assumed
that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.6 percent
O&G: 99.4 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 285.
Alternative A 13-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 13-11 (pressurized air flotation) an aerated lagoon system
with a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.060 kg/kkg (0.12 Ib/ton), the
suspended solids load is 0.075 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton), and the oil and
grease load is 0.075 kg/kkg (0.15 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $277,070
Total yearly cost: $110,220
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 235. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 97.2 percent
O&G: 98.7 percent
Alternative A 13-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 13-V dual media pressure filtration and a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.030 kg/kkg (0.060 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.037 kg/kkg (0.074 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.037 kg/kkg (0.074 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $309,790
Total yearly cost: $119,300
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 236. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.2 percent
SS: 98.6 percent
O&G: 99.4 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 286.
968
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 234
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 13-IV
(MARGARINE PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP UdSTFUTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.? PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
(BIBJKOSY)BN
TREATMENT MODULES;
INVESTMENT c
PI..CGMWQL KLSE
B...PUMPING STATICM
J...AJR FLOTATION
K. ..ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLLDGE THICKENER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
H...PUMPING STATION'
N...rUAL MFCIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
1. CCNSTRtCTl'CN 223300.00
P. LAND 59970.00
3. ENGINEERING 22,330.00
«. CONTINGENCY 22330.00
TOTAL 327930.00
YEARLY
J. LAPOR 24990.00
2. PCivER 15110.00
3. ChEMCALS 2080.00
a. ^AINTENANCE&SUPPLIES 10580.00
TC1*L 52760.00
TCTAU YEARLY CC5TSJ
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 52760.00
2. YM.RLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY 13120.00
3. DEPRECIATION 13400.00
TCTAL 79230.00
969
-------
VO
~J
O
•os.o
b «
«.0
z
121.5
ei.o
8.0
90.09 ?s.eo 6c.oo «5.oc To.ee 75.00 eo.eo cj.ee »o.co «j.oo iee.ee
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 285
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A13, ALTERNATIVES II THffSJ IV.
O
yo
-------
DARFT
TABLE 235
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE AT3- V
(MARGARINE PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUGARY FOR "USFEMTER TREATMENT
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION'
TREATMENT MODULES!
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Bl..CGMRGL HCLSE
B...PUMPIM'; STATION
J...AIB PLOTATICN
L...AP.BAT£r LAGCC'V
CCNSTROCTI'CN
LAND
PVC LTNPR
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABC"
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAlNTF.NANfEftSLPPLlES
PVC LU'EP
TOTAL YEARLY
5.
TCTAL
COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
P23910.CO
4000.00
22390.00
22390.00
277070.00
24990.00
50100.00
0.0
10170.00
230.00
65U90.00
85490.00
noeo.cn
1 3650.00
110220.00
971
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 236
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A13-VI
(MARGARINE PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR fcASTEMTFR TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.2 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESl
Bl..CONTROL MCLSE
B...PULPING STATION
J...A1R FLOTATION
L...AERATED LAGCON
B...PULPING STATION
N...DUAL *EDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
1. CONSTRUCTION 251170.00
2. LAND 4000.00
3. ENGINEERING 25120.00
4. CONTINGENCY 25120.00
5. PVC LINER "380.00
TOTAL 309790.00
YEARLY OPERATING C
1. LABOR 2^990.00
2. FCi«ER 55520.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4. f AH'TENANCEaSLPPLIES 10880.00
5. PVC LINER 230.00
TOTAL 91620.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSt
1. YEARLY CPEPATING COST 91620.00
2. YEARLY INv/ESTHENT
COST RECCv/ESY 12390.00
3. DEPRECIATJCK 15290.00
TOTAL 119300.CO
972
-------
b
$
VO
•>J
CO
8
u
.0
3t*.S
o:
5 JZ'.O
M.c
aO.9
I
0.0 I)
?c!c9
eo.ee 43.ee re.ee TS.CO te.co it.oe le.eo «J.oo too.oo
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 286
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 13, ALTERNATIVES II, V, AND VI
-------
DRAFT
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treat-ire.nt Technologies
for Subcategory A 14, Plasticizing and Packaging Shortening and Table Oils
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 14 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, seven alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels
of waste reductions for the model plant which processes 227 kkg (250 ton)
of finished edible oil products per day.
Alternative A 14-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent
from a 227 kkg per day plant is 87 cu m (0.023 MG) per day. The
BOD waste load is 0.56 kg/kkg (T.12 Ib/ton), the suspended solids
load is 0.42 kg/kkg (0.84 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load is 0.21
kg/kkg (0.42 Ib/ton).
The model plant developed for Subcategory A 14 is assumed to have sep-
arate discharge of process and non-contact wastewaters, in-plant gravity
separation and skimming, pH control, and an oil recovery system for re-
clamation of waste oil and grease skimmings.
Alternative A 14-11 - This alternative provides for the addition of
a complete mix activated sludge unit, secondary clarification, sludge
recirculating pump, a sludge thickening tank, vacuum filtration, and
a sludge holding tank. Sludge is hauled to a landfill facility every
26 days. The activated sludge unit also includes a control house and
two full-time operators.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.029 kg/kkg (0.058 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.038 kg/kkg (0.076 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease
load is 0.021 kg/kkg (0.042 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $201,390
Total yearly cost: $ 39,350
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 237. It is assumed
that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It is further
assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.8 percent
SS: 90.9 percent
O&G: 90.0 percent
Alternative A 14-111 - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 14-11 dual media filtration and a pump station to generate
sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.015 kg/kkg (0.030 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.015 kg/kkg (0.030 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease
load is 0.008 kg/kkg (0.016 Ib/ton).
974
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 237
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE AT4-II
(SHORTENING AND TABLE OIL PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN B1BKQSY
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9tt.8 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
81..CONTROL HCLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLUDGE THICKENER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
1. CONSTRUCTION 122710.00
2. LAND 5U1UO.OO
3. ENGINEERING 12270.00
4. CONTINGENCY 12270.00
TOTAL 201390.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 12490.00
2. PC*ER 6050.00
3. CHEMICALS 1870.00
a. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES 3520.00
TOTAL 23930.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 23930.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST KgCCVEPY fl060.00
3. DEPRECIATION 7360.00
TOTAL 39350.00
975
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total Investment cost: $217,340
Total yearly cost: $ 44,070
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 238, It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.3 percent
SS: 96.4 percent
O&G: 96.2 percent
Alternative A 14-IV - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 14-1II activated carbon adsorption prior to discharge to
navigable waters.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.008 kg/kkg (0.016 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.008 kg/kkg (0.016 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.004 kg/kkg (0.008 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $259,260
Total yearly cost: $ 62,190
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 239. It is
assumed that land costs $82,040 per hectare ($33,200 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.6 percent
SS: 98.1 percent
O&G: 98.1 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 287.
Alternative A 14-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 14-1 an aerated lagoon system with a settling pond.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.029 kg/kkg (0.058 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.038 kg/kkg (0.076 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.021 kg/kkg (0.042 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $147,390
Total yearly cost: $ 34,810
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 240. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one-half time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.8 percent
SS: 90.9 percent
O&G: 90.0 percent
976
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 238
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A14-III
(SHORTENING AND TABLE OIL PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR M5TFMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.3 PERCENT 80D REDUCTION
(BIBKGSY)BN
TREATMENT MODULES:
Bl..CONTROL HCLSE
8...PUMPING STATION
K...ACTIVATED SLUPGE
G...SLUDGE THICKENER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
V...HOLD ING TANK
N...OUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FRTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
CCN9TRUCTICN
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY
GPEPATING
1.
2.
?.
a.
COSTS»
LABOR
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCEBSLFPLIFS
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING CC8T
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
136000.Ofl
54140.00
13600.00
136.00.00
2173^0.00
12490.
7670.
1870.
00
00
00
5190.00
272PO.OO
27220.00
8690.00
8160.00
4M070.00
977
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 239
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A14-IV
(SHORTENING AND TABLE OIL PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTF*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 96.6 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESi
81..CONTROL HOUSE
R...PUMPING STATION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLL!DGfc THICKENER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLOIWC- TANK
N...DUAL *FDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
Z... ACTIVATE CARBON ADSORPTION'
CONSTHUCTTCN
LAND
INVESTMENT CCSTSJ
u
2.
3.
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
170900.00
saiiio.oo
YEARLY OPERATING
. 1.
2.
n.
COSTSi
LABOR
POFR
CHEMICALS
KAINTENAMCERSIPPLIES
170^0.00
00
00
00
10020,
1870,
TCTAL
17180.00
41.560.00
TOTAL
YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 41560.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
. COST MECCVERY 10370.00
3. DEPRECIATION 10260.00
TOTAL
62190.00
(BIBKGSYBN)Z
978
-------
2*0.)
10
o
Q
fc
in
•3
o
or
p
O
t««.5
10J.J
o
flc.ee
«*.ee «i.e« »»,68 i7.es «e.ee
EFFICIENCY
toe.et
FIGURE 287
INVESTMEm" AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A14, ALTERNATIVES II THHUUbH IV
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 240
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A14-V
(SHORTENING AND TABLE OIL PROCESSING)
TTEMTZFD COST 81'MKAKY FOR KASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 94.8 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
8L
TREATMENT MODULES?
B...PUMPING STATION
L...AERATED I.AGCCN
CCNSTPl-rTJCM
I..ANP
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4. CONTINGENCY
5. PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSs
2! POWER
3. CHEMICALS
5. PVC
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY- OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
116910.00
3330.00
11690.00
11690.00
3770.00
147390.00
6250.00
13680.00
0.0
1640.00
140.00
21710.00
21710.00
5900.00
7200.00
34810.00
980
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 14-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 14-V dual media pressure filtration and a pump station to
generate sufficient head for filter operation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.015 kg/kkg (0.030 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.015 kg/kkg (0.030 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.008 kg/kkg (0.016 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $163,350
Total yearly cost: $ 39,520
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 241. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that one-half time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.3 percent
SS: 96.4 percent
O&G: 96.2 percent
Alternative A 14-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 14-VI activated carbon adsorption before final discharge to
navigable waters.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.008 kg/kkg (0.016 Ib/ton), the suspended
solids load is 0.008 kg/kkg (0.016 Ib/ton), and the oil and grease load
is 0.004 kg/kkg (0.008 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $205,260
Total yearly cost: $ 57,640
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 242. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that a one-half time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.6 percent
SS: 98.1 percent
O&G: 98.1 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 288.
_Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment
Technologies for Stibcateanrv A 15 - mivo nn Rpfinina,
A model plant representative of subcategory A 15 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, three alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which produces
7.6 cu m (0.002 MG) of refined olive oil per day.
981
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 241
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A14-VI
(SHORTENING AND TABLE OIL PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP- M8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
(BLJ8N
TREATMENT MODULES:
8...PULPING STATION
L..,AFPATEr LAGOON
B...PUMPING STATION
M...OUAL MEDIA PRESSURE
FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR
C 9 f L. " t W
3. CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE8SLPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
5.
TOTAL
YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEASLY
2. YEARLY
OPERATING COST
INVESTMENT
COST
3.
TOTAL
RECOVERY
130210.00
3330.00
13020.00
13020.00
3770.00
163350.00
6250.00
15290.00
0.0
3310.00
i«0.00
24990.00
24990.00
6530,00
ecoo.oo
39520.00
982
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 242
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 14-VII
(SHORTENING AND TABLE OIL PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR KASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN (BLBN)Z
DFSIGN EFFICIENCY.., 98.6 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCOULESi
Bo
Lo
B.
N.
Z.
.PUMPING STATION
.AERATED LAGDCN
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED CARBCN, ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
«.
5.
CPNSTPUCTICK
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
a.
s.
CCSTSt
LABOR
PCHES
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCES-SUPPLIES
PVC LINER
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
165140.
3330.
16510.
16510.
00
00
00
00
3770.00
205260.00
6250.00
17650.00
0.0
15290.00
HO.00
39330.00
39330.00
8210.00
10100.00
57640.00
983
-------
oo
a
a
te
CO
8
o
o
t!».e
Ift.f
JJT.?
IZC.O
tei.8
M.4
£
I—I
o.
SI.2
INVESTMENT
«».oe tce.ie
11.08 «}.ee ««.ee «t.ee «».oo vr.ee «i.ec
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 288
YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A14, ALTERNATIVE V THROUGH VII
-------
DRAFT
It is estimated that the effluent from a 7.6 cu m (0.002 MG) per day
plant is 1.1 cu m (0.0003 MG) per day The BOD waste load is 0.85
kg/cu m (7.1 lb/1000 gal), the suspended solids load is 0.044 kg/cu m
(0.37 lb/1000 gal) and the oil and grease load is 0.029 kg/cu m
(0.24 Ib/gal).
Alternative A 15-1 - This alternative consists of pumping station, a
holding tank and spray irrigation of the raw waste effluent. It is
assumed that a minimum of 0.65 ha (1.6 acres) of land is required.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal), the
suspended solids load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal) and the oil and
grease load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $37,730
Total yearly cost: $ 5,170
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 243. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that no operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
Alternative A 15-11 - This alternative -consists of land spreading
the raw waste effluent. It is assumed that a minimum of 0.4 ha (one
acre) of land is required and that the effluent does not need to be
pumped more than 150 m (500 ft).
The resulting-BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal), the
suspended solids load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal) and the oil
and grease load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $5,260
Total yearly cost: $ 540
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 244. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that no operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
985
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 243
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE AT 5-1
(OLIVE OIL REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTE*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.,.100.0 PERCENT POD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Y... HOLD INC TANK
I'...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. CONSTRUCTION
2. L*M)
3. fN'C-
TGTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSt
2. PCWFR
3. CHEMICALS
a. MAIMTENAMCE*8LPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL VEARLY COSTS!
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVF9TMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRRC1ATICIK
TOTAL
25220.
267P.
2920
00
00
00
00
37730.00
0.0
830.00
0.0
1080.00
1910.00
1910.00
1510.00
1750.00
5170.00
986
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 244
ITEMIZED
COST SUMMARY
(OLIVE OIL
FOR ALTERNATIVE A 15-11
REFINING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 100 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
INVESTMENT COSTS
1
2
3
4
LAND SPREADING
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1
2
3
4
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTS:
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE
& SUPPLIES
TOTAL
COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
3000.00
1660.00
300.00
300.00
5260.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
210
180
00
00
540.00
987
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 15-111 - This alternative consists of hauling the waste-
water to a municipal treatment facility.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal), the
suspended solids load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal) and the oil and
grease load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $0.
Total yearly cost: $1,200
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
O&G: 100 percent
BEVERAGES
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment
Technologies for Subcategory A 16 - New Large Breweries
A model plant representative of subcategory A 16 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, thirteen alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which produces
1500 cu m (12,800 bbl) per day.
Alternative A 16-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a
1500 cu m (12,800 bbl) per day plant is 8300 cu m (2.2 m) • per day.
The BOD waste load is 10.55 kg/cu m (2.722 Ib/bbl), and the suspended
solids load is 3.89 kg/cu m (1.004 Ib/bbl).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 16-11 - This alternative provides screening and a grit
chamber, flow equalization, neutralization, nutrient addition, and an
aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load 150.28 kg/cu m (0.072 Ib/bbl) and the sus-
pended solids load is 0.39 kg/cu m (0.100 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,355,740
Total yearly cost: $1,055,530
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 245. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.4 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
988
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 245
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-II
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTFMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.« PERCENT
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 16-1II - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 16-11 dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.14 kg/cu m (0.036 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.19 kg/cu m (0.049 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,495,160
Total yearly cost: $1,088,090
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 246. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.7 percent
SS: 95.0 percent
Alternative A 16-IV - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 16-1II.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.07 kg/cu m (0.018 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.09 kg/cu m (0.023 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $3,798,200
Total yearly cost: $1,324,820
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 247. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.4 percent
SS: 97.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 239.
Alternative A 16-V - This alternative provides a control house, screen-
ing and a grit chamber, flow equalization, neutralization, nutrient
addition, a complete-mix activated sludge system, sludge thickening,
aerobic digestion, and vacuum filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.28 kg/cu m (0.072 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.39 kg/cu m (0.100 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $3,730,960
Total yearly cost: $1,029,500
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 248. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.4 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
990
-------
DARFT
TABLE 246
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-III
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SL^ARY FOP HASTF.MTEK TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.7 PERCENT BOH REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
EI . .SCREENING * GRIT CHAMBER
C... EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITNOGEN ADDITION
L.
L.
K
. AERATED
. AERATED
.DU4L
LAGOON
IAQCCN
IA PRESSURE
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
u.
5.
CCN3TRUCTTCN'
LAND
LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
1. LABOR
2. FOEW
3. CHEMICALS
U,
5.
MAINTENANCERSLRPLIES
PVC l.JKFW
1995820 . 00
26aiO.OO
!«>95eO.OO
199580.00
73770.00
2«95160.00
24990.00
696880.00
7M90.00
63580.00
5200.00
TCTAU
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTgJ
1. YEARLY OPEPAT^G CCST
2. VEAKLY IMVFSTKFM
CHST *FCCVE'HY 9961.0.00
3, DEPRECIATION 123440.00
TCTAL
991
-------
DARFT
TABLE 247
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-IV
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMEN'T CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.... 99. u PERCENT 8GD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
El..SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACIO NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN AMBITION
L...AERATED LAGOON
L...AERATED LAGOON
N...CUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
2... ACTIVATED CARBON ADSCRPT'IGM
INVESTMENT CCSTSJ
1.
2.
3.
«.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
i.
2.
3.
3061680.00
36410.00
308170.00
30S170.00
73770.00
3798300.00
5.
CHEMICALS
MAIMENANCE&SLPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
24990.00
726220.00
74190.00
151700.00
5200.00
9P4300.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 96^300.00
?.. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 151930.00
3. DEPRECIATION 168590.00
TOTAL
1324820.00
992
-------
vo
co
<
V5C.2
2 2701.
2\^.i.
: !> 7 ?. 2
! 3 2 "5. •
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 289
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 16, ALTERNATIVE IV
:oc.cc
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 248
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-V
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR "ASTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MGDULESi
. 81..CONTROL NCLSE .
EI..SCRFEMKG & GRIT CHAMBER
3. . .PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITRCGF.N ADDITION
*...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLUDGE THICKF.NER
R...AEP-CSIC DIGESTCR
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y.., ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT COSTS?
1. CONSTRUCTION 3028620.00
2. LAND 96620.00
3. ENGINEERING 302660.00
a. CONTINGENCY 302860.00
TCTAL 3730960.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LA9f!K 7«970.00
2. pC^F.^ 058410.00
3. CHEMICALS 113770.00
a. MAIMTENANCE&SUPPLIES 51390.00
TCTAL 696540.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
i. YEARLY CPEPATIKG COST 698sao.oo
2. YEARUY INVESTMENT
COST "FcC\/EfiY U9240.CO
3. DfPPEClATICA 181720.00
^ 1029500.00
994
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 16-VI - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to Alternative A 16-V.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.14 kg/cu m (0.036 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.19 kg/cu m (0.049 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $3,870,380
Total yearly cost: $1,062,060
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 249. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.7 percent
SS: 95.0 percent
Alternative A 16-VII - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 16-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.07 kg/cu m (0.018 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.09 kg/cu m (0.023 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $5,173,420
Total yearly cost: $1,298,800
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 250. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.4 percent
SS: 97.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 290.
Alternative A 16-VIII-This alternative replaces vacuum filtration in
A 16-V with sludge storage and spray irrigation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.28 kg/cu m (0.072 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.39 kg/cu m (0.100 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $3,652,280
Total yearly cost: $ 933,750
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 251. It is
assumed that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.4 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
Alternative A 16-IX - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 16-VIII.
995
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 249
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-VI
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
MODULES!
Bl ..COMRCL MCI SE
F-1..SCRF.FNTNG ft c-PIT CHAMPFR
B... PUMPING STATION
C...FQUALIZATICN BASIN
F.. .ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H. ..NITRCGFN ADDITION
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
P...AERCSIC DIGESTCH
S...VACLUM FILTRA1ICN
Y... HOLDING TANK
N...PUAL MFCTA PRESSURE
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
' CN 3U.800.00
3.' FNGTKEERN '°
3870360.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 7/jQ7rt AA
2. PCkPW 7^970.00
^76510.00
•*
ES 53300.0
718550.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY CPEP-ATING CCgl 7185^0 00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT 5-0.00
CCST RECCVPRY
' L ' 106?C60.00
996
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 250
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-VII
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.4 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
.CONTROL HCL'SE
.SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACID NEUTRALIZATION
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC DIGESTOR
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRAIN
• ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT CCSTSJ
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LABOR
2. PC^ER
3. CHEMICALS
4. M
TOTAL
4230660.
96620.
423070,
423070,
00
00
00
00
5173420.00
74970.
507850.
113770.
141430.
00
00
00
00
836020.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 838020.po
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY 20*940,00
3, DEPRECIATION 253840.00
TOTAL 1298800.00
997
-------
o:
<
to
CO
z
I-H
m 19U.O
— Jiet.s
>•
u
g
o
ie>*.e
«o.oo «i.co «.u »».•• '*••'EFpi'hecY "*" 'T'eo "*" "*" too>0°
FIGURE 290
AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 16, ALTERNATIVE VII
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 251
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-VIII
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SlPMRV FOR kASTE^ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.., °7.4 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
MODULES:
..CONTROL HCUSE
El..SCREENING I GRIT CHAMBER
B...PULPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACTD NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLLDGF THICKENER
P...AEROBIC CIGESTCR
Y... HOLD ING TANK
u...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
CONSTRUCTION
2. LAND
3. ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1
2
3
CCSTS:
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
TOTAL YEARLY
TOTAL
CCSTSJ
i. YF.AKLY
2. YEARLY
COST
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
OPERATING
INVFSTCfNT
3006770
4^150
300680,
3C0680,
00
,00
,00
,00
3652280.00
7^970.
430350,
00
00
74190.00
27740.00
607250.00
6C7250.00
146090.00
IftOMO.OO
933750.00
999
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.14 kg/cu m (0.036 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.19 kg/cu m (0,049 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $3,791,680
Total yearly cost: $ 966,310
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 252. It is
assumed that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.7 percent
SS: 95.0 percent
Alternative A 16-X - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 16-IX.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.07 kg/cu m (0.018 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.09 kg/cu m (0.023 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $5,094,720
Total yearly cost: $1,203,040
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 253. It is assumed
that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is further
assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.4 percent
SS: 97.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 291.
Alternative A 16-XI - This alternative replaces vacuum filtration in
Alternative A 16V with sand drying.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.28 kg/cu m (0.072 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.39 kg/cum (0.100 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $6,764,510
Total yearly cost: $1,527,890
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 254. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.4 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
Alternative A 16-XII - This alternative adds dual media filtration
to Alternative A 16-XI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.014 kg/cu m (0.036 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.019 kg/cu m (0.049 Ib/bbl).
1000
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 252
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-IX
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FQR &A37EMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,.. 9H.7 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
PI..CONTROL HCLSE
E1..SCPFFNJKG ft C-RJT CHAMREP
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
P...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
I-...NITROGEN APDITIC'N
"...ACTIVATED SLUDGF:
O...SLLDGE THICKENER
R.,.AEROBIC DIGESTPR
Y..,HOLDING TANK
t... SPRAY IRRIGATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSz
1.
2.
3.
a.
CCNSTRUCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
2. POKER
3. CHEMICALS
3t22950.00
aaisc.oo
312290.00
312290.00
3791660.00
7^970.00
S! PPLIES
TCTAl
7^190.00
29650.00
627260.00
TCTAL
YEARLY CCSTSS
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 627260.oo
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST
3.
TOTAL
151670.00
1673fiO.OO
966310.00
1001
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 253
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-X
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST Sl^AWY FC"« KAJTEMTFR
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... '„.« P£RCEN?TBCD
TREATMENT .MODULES?
INVESTMENT
ei.. COM POL HCUSE
El . .SCREENING 8 GRIT CHAMBER
B...PUKPIN-G STATION'
C...EQLAL I7ATICN BASIN
P. ..ACID Nfl TPALIZATICN
H. . .NITROGEN ADDITION
*.. .ACTIVATED SLUDGE
0...3LLDGE THICKENER
P...AEPCHIC DIGESTCR
Y... HOLDING TANK
U... SPRAY IRRIGATION
N...DUAL ^EOIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
Z... ACTIVATED CA«BCN ADSCRPTJCM
COSTSl
1.
•
CCJ.8TBUCTICM
L °
^208810.00
YEARLY OPERATIMG COSTS:
IB LABCP
3' CHEMICALS
J. M
f L
^79790
7fll90
117770
7^720
00
00
.00
.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. DEARLY TPERATIKG COST 7^6
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST PFCCVERY
PEPRFCIAT10N
I . .
L 12030^0
00
1002
-------
5 0 0 S . 0 I
o
o
CO
w /
5
8
U.
O
8
I
O
(fl
8
>
S-H*
>-
s
u
a
<
u
J.'io.-
3.:;-,
«7.c:
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 291
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 16, ALTERNATIVE X
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 254
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-XI
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HtSTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.a PERCENT 300 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESj
91..CONTROL HCLSF
El..SCREENING 8 GRIT CHAMBER
R...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION 8ASIN'
P...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
*...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLUDGE THICKENER
R...AEROBIC DIGESTCk
T...SAND DRYING BEDS
INVESTMENT COSTS:
i.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4,- CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
5055920.
217MO.
545590.
00
00
00
545590.00
6764510.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 74970.00
2. PCWEtf 429J70.00
3. CHEMICALS 74190.00
a. MAJNTFNANCE&SIPPLIES 351630.00
TOTAL 929960.00
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 929960.00
?. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
270560,
327350
00
00
TOTAL
1527890.00
1004
-------
Costs: Total investment cost: $6,903,930
Total yearly cost: $1,560,460
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 255. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.7 percent
SS: 95.0 percent
Alternative A 16-XIII - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 16-XII.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.07 kg/cu m (0.018 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.09 kg/cu m (0.023 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $8,206,970
Total yearly cost: $1,797,190
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table256. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.4 percent
SS: 97.6 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure292.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategory A 17 - Old Large Breweries
A model plant representative of subcategory A 17 was developed in
Section-V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives.
In Section VII, thirteen alternatives were selected as being applicable
engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels
of waste reductions for the model plant which produces 2600 cu m (22,000
bbl) per day.
Alternative A 17-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a
2600 cu m (22,000 bbl) per day plant is 28,000 cu m (7.5 MG) per day. The
BOD waste load is 18.56 kg/cu m (4.78 Ib/bbl), and the suspended solids
load is 7.32 kg/cu m (1.89 Ib/bbl).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 17-II - This alternative provides screening and a grit
chamber, flow equalization, neutralization, nutrient addition, and an
aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.55 kg/cu m (0.14 Ib/bbl), and the sus-
pended solids load is 0.76 kg/cu m (0.20 Ib/bbl).
1005
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 255
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-XII
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOS *ASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.7 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
Bl
El
8.
C.
F.
H.
K.
Q.
R
.CONTROL HCLSE
.SCRFFMNG & GMIT CHAMBER
.PUMPING STATION
.EOULIZATICN BASIN
.ACID 'NEUTRALIZATION
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AF.RCBIC DIGESTCR
T...SAND DRYING 3EDS
N...CUAL KEDTA PRESSURE
FJLTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
i.
c.
3.
L A N P
El
C(
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1
2
3
CCSTSi
LABOR
PC^ER
CHEMICALS
5572100.00
217^10.00
557210.00
557210.00
6Q03930.00
7^970.00
TCTAL
74190.00
353540.00
949970.00
TCTAL YEARLY
CCSTSt
i. YEARUV OPERATING COST 9^9970.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST 9F.CCVF.RY 276160.00
3. DEPRECIATIOfv 334330.00
TCTAL
1560460.00
1006
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 256
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A16-XIII
(NEW LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.4 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
MODULES!
fll
El
B.
C.
F.
H.
*.
Q.
R.
T.
N.
Z.
.CONTROL HOUSE
.SCREENING 8, GRIT CHAMBER
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACID NEUTRALIZATION
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
,SLlDGE THICKENER
.AERCPIC DIGESTOR
.SANO DRYING BEDS
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED CA«BCN ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
i.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
6657960.00
217«10.00
665800.00
665800.00
8206970.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 74970.00
2. POWER . ' 478610.00
3. CHEMICALS 74190.00
4. MAINTENANCERSL'PPLIES 441660.00
TOTAL • 1069430.00
TOTAL YEARLY
CCST5«
1. YEARLY OPERATING CQSTl 069430.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECCVERY 328280.oo
3. DEPRECIATION 399480.00
TOTAL 1797190.00
1007
-------
o
o
00
d
U.
O
z 6 a 7:. c
2 ,;33C
z
1-4
§ „„.,
Q
I
351!.
1527.C
o.J: «i.:^ «e.:? iJ." <>.;? <'._:;^ «6.co «T.CC «e.cc
FIGURE 292
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COST FOR SUBCATEGORY A 16, SUBCATEGORY XIII
icc.co
5
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $7,125,250
Total yearly cost: $3,328,060
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 257. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.0 percent
SS: 89.5 percent
Alternative A 17-1II - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 17-11 dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.27 kg/cu m (0.07 Ib/bbl), and the sus-
pended solids load is 0.38 kg/cu m (0.10 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $7,526,890
Total yearly cost: $3,422,120
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 258. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 94.7 percent
Alternative A 17-IV - This alternative adds activated carbon to Alter-
native A 17-111.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and the sus-
pended solids load is 0.19 kg/cu m (0.05 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $11,677,060
Total yearly cost: $ 4,195,440
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 259. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.3 percent
SS: 97.5 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 293.
Alternative A 17-V - This alternative provides a control house, screen-
ing and a grit chamber, flow equalization, neutralization, nutrient
addition, a complete mix activated sludge system, sludge thickening,
aerobic digestion, and vacuum filtration.
1009
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 257
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE AT 7-11
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA3TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.0 PERCENT 80D REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
El..SCREENING R GPIT CHAMBER
P...PUMPING STATION
C...PENALIZATION BASIN
F...ACTD NEUTRALIZATION
H...MITROGEN ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGOON
L...AERATED LAGCCN
M...SETTLING PCND
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1. CONSTRUCTION 5697460.00
2. LANT. 55310.00
3. ENGINEERING 569750.00
4, CONTINGENCY 569750.00
5. FVC LINER 232980.00
TOTAL 7125250.00
YEARLY OPERATING CGSTSi
1. LABOR 2«990.00
2. POER 2259300.00
3. CHEMICALS 241780.00
4. MINTENANCE&SIPPLIES U56BO.OO
5, PVC LINER 17800.00
TOTAL 2689550.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST2689550.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY 285010.00
3. DEPRECIATION 353500.00
TOTAL 332806C.OO
1010
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 258
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-III
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR wASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN' EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT BOD SEDUCTION
TREATMENT HODULESi
El
B.
C.
F.
H.
L.
L.
M.
.SCREENING g GRIT CHAMBER
.PliyPJNG STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACID NEUTRALIZATION
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.AERATFO LAGOON
.AERATI-H LAGOON
.SETTLING POND
MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTSt
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
c •
3.
CCSTSt
LABOR
PCWEP
CHEMICALS
6032160.00
55310.00
603220.00
603220.00
232960.00
7526890.00
00
00
00
2311710.
2^1780.
MAINTENAN'CESSLPPLIES 151180.00
FVC LINFR 17800.00
TOTAL 27^7460.00
5.
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. VfARLY OPERATIC COST27^7a60.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 301080.00
3. DEPRECIATION 373580.00
TOTAL 3^22120.00
ion
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 259
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-IV
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FUR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN)
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESj
El..SCREENING R GRIT CHAMBER
8...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
P...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGCCN
L...AERATED LAGOON
M...SETTLING FOND
N...OUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
2...ACTIVATED CARBC\ ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT COSTSt
1. CONSTRUCTION 9490650.00
2« LAND 55310.00
3. ENGlNEtRING $49060.00
4. CONTINGENCY 9a9Q60.00
5. PVC LINER 232980.00
TOTAL 11677060.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
1. LABOR 2^990.00
2« PCh^R 2^12030.00
3. CHEMICALS 2^1780.00
4. MAIMTEMANCERSUPPLIES 450670.00
5. FVC LINER 17800.00
TCTAl- 3147270.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST3147270.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY 4670*0.00
3. DEPRECIATION 581090.00
TCTAL 4195440,00
1012
-------
o
_^
oo
IOOCP.0
fl!
75*5.3
O
«i fc J. c
i ! ? : . J I
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 293
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 17, ALTERNATIVE IV
a
§
-n
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.55 kg/cu m (0.14 Ib/bbl), and the sus-
pended solids load is 0.76 kg/cu m (0.20 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $11,377,110
Total yearly cost: $ 3,107,230
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 260. it is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.0 percent
SS: 89.5 percent
Alternative A 17-VI - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to Alternative A 17-V.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.27 kg/cu m (0.07 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.38 kg/cu m (0.10 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $11,778,750
Total yearly cost: $ 3,201,290
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 261 . It is assumed
that land costs $41,000 per hectare (16,600 per acre). It is further
assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 94.7 percent
Alternative A 17-VII - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 17-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.19 kg/cu m (0.05 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $15,928,940
Total yearly cost: $ 3,974,630
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 262. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.3 percent
SS: 97.5 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 294.
Alternative A 17-VIII - This alternative replaces vacuum filtration in
A 17-V with sludge storage and spray irrigation.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 260
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-V
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SIMMARV FUR lNASTE*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
PI
F.
B.
C.
F.
H
R.
S.
Y.
.CONTROL HOUSE
.ACID NEUTRALIZATION
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACID NEUTRALIZATION
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AERCBIC CIGfSTOR
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSs
1.
2.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
3.
9260880.00
26^050.00
926090.00
926090.00
11377110.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
COSTS}
LABOR 74970.00
POWER 1518390.00
CHEMICALS 481670.00
4. MAIK'TENANCEIISUPPLIES 21470.00
TOTAL 2096500.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST2096500.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVFRY 455080.00
3. nFPRF.CIATICN -555650.00
TCTAL 3107230.00
1015
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 261
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-VI
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9P.5 PERCENT POD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
81 ..CONTROL HCLSE
F...ACIC NEUTRALIZATION
B.., PUMPING STATION
C... EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACIO NEUTRALIZATION
^...MITRGGEN. ADDITION
K... ACTIVATES SLUDGE
c... SLUDGE THICKENER
R... AEROBIC DIGESTOR
S... VACUUM FILTRATION
Y... HOLDING TANK
N...DUAU MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 262
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-VII
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR vnASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
81
F
B
C
F
H
K
G
R
s
V
N
z
CONTROL HCUSE
ACTD NEUTRALIZATION
PUMPING STATION
EQUALIZATION BASIN
ACID NEUTRALIZATION
NITROGEN ADDITION
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
SLUDGE THICKENER
AERCBIC CIGESTOR
VACUUM FILTRATION
HOLDING TANK
DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
ACTIVATED CARB&N 'ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT CCSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCNSTRUCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
13054070.00
264050.00
1305^10.00
1305aiO.OO
15928940.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
1. LABOR 74970.00
2. PCKER 1671120.00
3. CHEMICALS 481670.00
4. KAINTENANCERSUPPLIES 326470.00
TCTAL 2554230.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSt
i. YEARLY OPERATING ccsT255423o.oo
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 637160.00
3. DEPRECIATION 783240.00
TOTAL 3974630.00
1017
-------
O
00
8
_i
b
V)
(fl
8
>-
VH»
>-
>
a
o
(£55.6
«o.co
«-,cc 05. oe
EFFICIENCY
«T.CC
100.00
FIGURE 294
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 17, ALTERNATIVE VII
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.55 kg/cu m (0.14 Ib/bbl), and the sus-
pended solids load is 0.76 kg/cu m (0.20 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $11,233,200
Total yearly cost: $ 2,833,190
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 263. It is
assumed that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.0 percent
SS: 89.5 percent
Alternative A 17-IX - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 17-VIII.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.27 kg/cu m (0.07 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.38 kg/cu m (0.10 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $11,634,840
Total yearly cost: $ 2,927,240
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 264. It is
assumed that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 94.7 percent
Alternative A 17-X - This alternative adds activated carbon to Alter-
native A 17-IX.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.19. kg/cu m (0.05 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $15,785,030
Total yearly cost: $ 3,700,570
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 265. It is
assumed that land costs assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.3 percent
SS: 97.5 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 295.
Alternative A 17-XI - This alternative replaces vacuum filtration in
Alternative A 17-V with sand drying beds. This alternative was not
deemed economically viable and therefore was not costed.
1019
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 263
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-VIII
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
PI..CONTROL HCISE
El..SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGFN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
5...SLUDGE THICKENER
R...AEROBIC r.IGESTOR
Y...HOLDING TAMK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. CONSTRUCTION 9252610.00
2. LAND 130070.00
3. KMGINEKRING 925260.00
it. CONTINGENCY 925260.00
TOTAL 11233200.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS*
1. LABOR 74970.00
2. PCHER H30180.00
3. CHEMICALS 241780.00
4. MAINTFNANCE&SLPPLXES 81770.00
TOTAL 1828700.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 1828700 . 00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 449330.00
3. DEPRECIATION 555160.00
TOTAL 2633190.00
1020
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 264
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-IX
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESt
Bl.. CONTROL HCUSE
El. .SCREENING 8 GRIT CHAMBER
S... PUMPING STATION
C... EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H... NITROGEN- ADDITION
*... ACTIVATED SLL-DGE
is... SLUDGE THICKENER
R...AERCPIC DIGESTOR
Y... HOLDING TANK
U... SPRAY IRRIGATION
N'..,DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTPA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
*•
3.
a.
rCNSTPlifTTCN
L^Nf5
ENGINEERING
CCNTINGEN-CY
9587310.00
130070.00
956730.00
95P730.00
U63«8
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 265
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A17-X
(OLD LARGE BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST S.UMMAKY FOP *ASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN-
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
CONTROL HCUSE
SCREENING! 8 SPIT CHAMBER
PUMPING STATION
EQUALIZATION BASIN
ACID NEUTRALIZATION
NITROGEN ADDITION
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
SLUDGE THICKENER
AEROBIP DIGESTOR
HOLDING TANK
SPRAY IRRIGATION
DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTPA'N
ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
13045800,
130070,
1304580,
1304580,
00
00
00
00
TOTAL
15785030.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCSTSl
LABOR 7^970,00
POKER 1582910.00
CHEMICALS 241780.00
MAINTENANCEftSLPPLlES 366760.00
TOTAL
2286420.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST2286420.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 631400.00
DEPRECIATION 782750.00
3.
TCTAL
3700570,00
1022
-------
d
O l57i>s.C
U.
O
2
t-i
H
o
ro
CO
<
*^
u
Z63J.O
«c.co
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.55 kg/cu m (0.14 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.76 kg/cu m (0.20 Ib/bbl).
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.0 percent
SS: 89.5 percent
Alternative A 17-XII - This alternative adds dual media filtration
to Alternative A 17-XI. This alternative was not deemed economically
viable and therefore was not costed.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.27 kg/cu m (0.07 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0138 kg/cu m (0.10 Ib/bbl).
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.5 percent
SS: 94.7 percent
Alternative A 17-XI11 - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 17-XII. This alternative was not deemed economically
viable and therefore was not costed.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.19 kg/cu m (0.05 Ib/bbl).
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.3 percent
SS: 97.5 percent
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategory A 18 - All Other Breweries
A model plant representative of subcategory A 18 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, thirteen alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which produces
470 cu m (4000 bbl) per day.
Alternative A 18-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 470 cu m (4000 bbl) per day plant is 4500 cu m (1.2 MG) per day.
The BOD v/aste load is 13.53 kg/cu m (3.491 Ib/bbl), and the suspended
solids load is 6.19 kg/cu m (1.60 Ib/bbl).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 18-11 - This alternative provides screening and a grit
chamber, flow equalization, neutralization, nutrient addition, and an
aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.48 kg/cu m (0.12 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.68 kg/cu m (0.18 Ib/bbl).
1024
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,344,140
Total yearly cost: $ 530,240
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 266. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 96.4 percent
SS: 89.1 percent
Alternative A 18-III - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 18-11 dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/cu m (0.06 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.34 kg/cu m (0.09 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,432,200
Total yearly cost: $ 551,760
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 267. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.2 percent
SS: 94.5 percent
Alternative A 18-IV - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 18-111.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.12 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.17 kg/cu m (0.04 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,337,000
Total yearly cost: $ 706,630
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 268 . It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.0 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 296.
Alternative A 18-V - This alternative provides a control house, screen-
ing and a grit chamber, flow equalization, neutralization, nutrient
addition, a complete mix activated sludge system, sludge thickening,
aerobic digestion, and vacuum filtration.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 266
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-II
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR hASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 96,U PERCENT 80D REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
B...PULPING STATION'
El..SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
L...AERATED LAQOCN
L...AERATED LAGOON
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LJNFR
TOTAL
1073410.00
17950.00
107340.00
107J40.00
38100.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
CCSTS:
LABOR
PPMER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIE3
PVC LINER
TCTAL
3^990.00
3P2080.00
3^^00.00
25800.00
2890.00
410160.00
TCTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING CTST 410160.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVEKY 53770.00
3. DEPRECIATION 66310.00
TCTAL
530240.00
1026
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 267
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-III
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FtS waSTEfcATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 268
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-IV
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FCR HASTENATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN' EFFICIENCY... 99.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDl'LES:
0...PULPING STATION
El..SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER
C...ECJIALIZATICN BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGOON
L...AERATED LAGCCN
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
2..,ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1,
c »
3.
-------
5
8
b
ZJ58.C I
I
I
I
I
?!:7.i I
I
I
i
I
O
ro
I— lela.B i
I. !
g »».,:
9 :
< i
^ 107,:.i i
53C
sc:
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 296
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 18, ALTERNATIVE IV
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.48 kg/cu m (0.12 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.68 kg/cu m (0.18 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,506,780
Total yearly cost: $ 440,710
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 269. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 96.4 percent
SS: 89.1 percent
Alternative A 18-VI - This alternative provides dual media fil-
tration in addition to Alternative A 18-V.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/cu m (0.06 Ib/bbl), and
the suspended solids load is 0.34 kg/cu m (0.09 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,594,850
Total yearly cost: $ 461,230
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 270. it is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.2 percent
SS: 94.5 percent
Alternative A 18-VII - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 18-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.12 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.17 kg/cu m (0.04 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,499,660
Total yearly cost: $ 616,110
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table271. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre).
It is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.0 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 297.
Alternative A 18-VIII - This alternative replaces vacuum filtration
in A 18-V with sludge storage and spray irrigation.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 269
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-V
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR 'wASTE/A TKR TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 96.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 270
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-VI
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HASTE*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.2 PERCENT SOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl
El
B.
C.
F.
H.
K.
Q.
R.
S.
Y.
N.
.COMROL HCL8E
.SCREENING * GRIT CHAMBER
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACID NEUTRALIZATICN
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC DIGESTCR
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
1275170.00
64640.00
127520.00
127520.00
1594850.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
COSTS!
LABfiR
CHEMICALS
4. "AJNTENANCE&3UPPLIES
TOTAL
74970.00
177250.00
50320.00
18390.00
320930.00
TOTAL YEARLY
CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 320930.00
2, YEARLY 'INVEST^EKT
CCST RECOVERY 63790.00
3. DEPRECIATION 76510.00
TOTAL 461230.00
1032
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 271
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-VII
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SiiMMRY FOR HASTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TPEATMFNT MODULES}
81. .CONTROL HCLSE
El..SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER
8...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITRC:GEN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLUrGF THICKENER
R0..AERrRIC DIGESTOR
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
N...PUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
2...ACTIVATED CARBON ABSORPTION
INVESTMENT CTSTSl
1. CONSTRUCTION 2029180.00
2. LAND 64640.00
3. ENGINEERING 202920.00
«. CONTINGENCY 202920.00
TCTAL 2499660.00
YFAPLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 74970.00
?.. FC'^ER 201610.00
3. CHEMICALS 50320.00
4. MMNTBNAMCE*SUPPLIES 67470.00
TCTAL 394370,00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 394370.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 99990.00
3. DEPRECIATION 121750.00
TCTAL 616110.00
1033
-------
i1-::.: <
O
CO
a
<
8 '"
u.
o
O
o
o
5
- It'!.!
t ,„.,;
S . :
o
73
°-.oc «i.vO I?.:" «j.:c '-.cr <5.:s «i.cc «7.cc «6.co
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 297
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 18, ALTERNATIVE VII
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.48 kg/cu m (0.12 Ib/bbl), and
the suspended solids load is 0.68 kg/cu m (0.18 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,473,950
Total yearly cost: $ 405,140
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 272. it is assumed
that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is further
assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 96.4 percent
SS: 89.1 percent
Alternative A 18-IX - This alternative adds dual media filtration
to Alternative A 18-VIII.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/cu m (0.06 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.34 kg/cu m (0.09 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,562,010
Total yearly cost: $ 425,670
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table273. It is
assumed that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.2 percent
SS: 94.5 percent
Alternative A 18-X - This alternative adds activated carbon to Alter-
native A 18-IX.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.12 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.17 kg/cu m (0.04 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,466,820
Total yearly cost: $ 580,540
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 274. It is
assumed that land costs $6150 per hectare ($2490 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.0 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 298.
Alternative A 18-XI - This alternative replaces vacuum filtration in
Alternative A 18-V with sand drying beds.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 272
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-VIII
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTFMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 96.4 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
.CONTROL HCISE
.SCREENING 8 GRIT CHAMBER
31.
Fl.
B...PUMPING STATION
(•...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITRPGF.* ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLLDGE THICKENER
R...AERCPIC OIGESTOR
V...HOLD ING TANK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTSl
1.
2.
3.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 273
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-IX
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZFD COST SUMMARY FOR I*ASTFMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9P02 PFHTFK.T BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
81..CONTROL HCH.SE
F-1 ..SCREENING R GRIT CHAMBER
e...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
P...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN AHCITICN
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
•3...SLUnGE THICKENER
R...AEROBIC CIGESTCR
Y...HOLDING TANK
li... SPRAY IRRIGATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTS»
1. CONSTRUCTION 1283630.00
2. LAND 21660.00
3. ENGINEERING 128360.00
«. CCNTINGtNfY 128360.00
TOTAL 1562010.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS*
1. LABCJH 7^)970.00
2. PCtoER 167120.00
3. CHEMICALS 3iiaOO.OO
«. "AINTFN4NCE&SLFPL1ES 9680.00
TOTAL 286170,00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
U YEARLY OPERATING COST 286170,00
?. YFARLY INVESTMENT
ctsi RECCVFPY 62i*eo.ofl
3» DEPRECIATION1 77020.00
TOTAL ^25670.00
1037
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 274
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-X
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP KASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.0 PERCENT BOP REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
61. .CONTROL HCUSE
El. .SCREENING R GRIT CHAMBER
8. ..PUMPING STATION
C... EQUALIZATION BASIC.;
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H... NITROGEN ADDITION
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C... SLUDGE THICKENER
R... AEROBIC DIGESTOR
Y... HOLDING TANK
U... SPRAY IRRIGATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FJLTRA'N
Z. . .ACTIVATED CARBON AO
INVESTMENT COSTSl
1. CONSTRUCTION 2037640.00
2. LaND 21660.00
3. ENGINEERING 203760.00
4. CONTINGENCY 203760.00
TOTAL 2466820.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS>
1. LABOR 74970.00
2. PCI^EP 19U80.00
3. CHEMICALS 34400.00
a. "AlWTENANCeaSlPPUlES 58760.00
TOTAL 359610.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 3596io.oo
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY <>867c.oo
3. DEPRECIATION 122260. CO
TOTAL ' 580540.00
1038
-------
o
OJ
IL
O
to
CO
o
o
BJ
<
u
w
_1
H
i—*
D.
O
30
3>
t; i. i
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 293
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 18, ALTERNATIVE X
i c:,
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.48 kg/cu m (0.12 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.68 kg/cu m (0.18 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,694,560
Total yearly cost: $ 638,610
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 27S It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 96.4 percent
SS: 89.1 percent
Alternative A 18-XII - This alternative adds dual media filtration
to Alternative A 18-XI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/cu m (0.06 Ib/bbl), and the
suspended solids load is 0.34 kg/cu m (0.09 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,782,630
Total yearly cost: $ 659,140
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 276. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.2 percent
SS: 94.5 percent
Alternative A 18-XIII - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 18-XII.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.12 kg/cu m (0.03 Ib/bbl), and
the suspended solids load is 0.17 kg/cu m (0.04 Ib/bbl).
Costs: Total investment cost: $3,687,440
Total yearly cost: $ 814,010
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 277. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.0 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 299 .
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcateqorv A 19 - Malt ~~~
A model plant representative of subcategory A 18 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
1040
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 275
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-XI
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FQfir fcASTEh ATEP- TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 96.a PERCENT 800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
PI..CONTROL HCUSE
E1..SCRE6MMG & GRIT CHAMBER
P...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...A.C.TD NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLUDGE THICKENER
P...AERCBIC DIGESTQR
T...SAKD DRYING BEDS
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
31*3100.00
icooao.oo
P16210.00
216210.00
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
a.
TCTAL YEARLY
CCSTSl
LABOR
CHEMICALS
KAINTEMN-CE&SUPPLIES
TCTAL
COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAu
7^970.00
.54780.00
136950.00
"01100.00
107760.00
129730.00
1041
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 276
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-XII
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR rtASTEMTFR TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98.? PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
81
El
8.
C.
F.
H.
K.
Q.
R.
T.
N.
.CONTROL HCUSE
.SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACTD NEUTRALIZATION
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE. THICKENER
.AEROBIC CIGESTCR
.SAND DRYING REOS
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
2235490.00
100040.00
223550.
223550.
00
00
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1,
2.
3.
LAPC*
PCkF>'
CHEMICALS
TOTAL YEARLY
TOTAL
COSTSt
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST FFCfVFPY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
2782630.00
7«970.00
166170.00
34400.00
136160.00
413700.00
413700.00
111310.00
134130.00
6591*10. 00
1042
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 277
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A18-XIII
(OTHER BREWERIES)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.., 99.0
PERCENT
TREATMENT CHAIN
800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MOPULESr
PI
El
P
C
F
H
K
G.
K
T
N
Z.
.COMROL HCUSE
.SCREENING & GRIT CHAMBER '
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACID WEUTRALIZATICN
.NITRPGFN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC CIGE8TOR
.SAND DRYING BEDS
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED CAPB'ON AB3GRPTICM
INVESTMENT CCSTSS
1.
2,
3,
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
2989500.00
100040,00
298950.00
298950.00
3667JUI0.60
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR
?. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
H. MAlNTFMMCtaSlPPLIES
TOTAL
74970.00
190530.00
34400.00
187240.00
407160.00
TOTAL YFARLY
COSTSi
1. YEARLY CPERATING COST 467l«0.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 147500.00
3. DEPRECIATION 179370.00
TCTAL 814010.00
1043
-------
O
-P»
-p.
§
s
I
u
JleS.C I
9-3.3 !
6J«.3 I
EFFICIENCY
«?.ec st.oo
153.CJ
FIGURE 299
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 18, ALTERNATIVE XIII
-------
DRAFT
natives. In Section VII, seven alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide
for various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which
produces 350 kkg (16,000 bu) per day.
Alternative A 19-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 350 kkg (16,000 bu) per day plant is 2590 cu m (0.685 MG) per day.
The BOD waste load is 4.55 kg/kkg (0.218 Ib/bu), and the suspended
solids load is 0.77 kg/kkg (0.037 Ib/bu).
Suspended solids in the waste, consisting mostly of grain and sprouts,
are assumed to be removed by screening prior to discharge.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 19-11 - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, nutrient addition, and an aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.22 kg/kkg (0.011 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0062 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,200,150
Total yearly cost: $ 572,660
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 278. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Suspended solids in the waste, consisting mostly of grain and sprouts,
is assumed to be removed by screening prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.2 percent
SS: 83.1 percent
Alternative A 19-111 - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 19-11 dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.11 kg/kkg (0.0053 Ib/bu), and
the suspended solids load is 0.06 kg/kkg (0.0029 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,245,740
Total yearly cost: $ 583,300
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 279. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Suspended solids in the waste, consisting mostly of grain and sprouts,
is assumed to be removed by screening prior to discharge.
1045
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 278
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A19-II
(MALT)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,.. 95.1 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODUlESi
PI..CONTROL HCLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
L.., AERATED LAGOON
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
a.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINf-R
959690.00
12740.00
95970.
95970.
00
00
TOTAL
35780.00
1200150.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
COSTS!
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENAMCERSL'PPLIES
PVC LINFR
24990,
401540,
3030,
3^080,
00
00
00
00
TOTAL
16«0,00
^65280.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 465280.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVFPY mio.oo
3. DEPRECIATION 59370.00
TGTAL 572660.00
1046
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 279
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A19-III
(MALT)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEHTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bi..CONTROL HCLSE
8...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
• L... AERATED LAGOON
6...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
997&80.00
12740.00
99770.
99770.
00
00
TOTAL
35780.00
1245740.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CCSTSj
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
249CQ.OO
407450.00
3030.00
34710.00
1640.00
471820.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSt
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 471820,00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 49630.00
3. DEPRECIATION 61650.00
TOTAL 583300.00
1047
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.6 percent
SS: 92.2 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 300.
Alternative A 19-IV - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, nutrient addition, a complete mix activated sludge
system, sludge thickening, aerobic digestion, and spray irrigation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.22 kg/kkg (0.011 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0062 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $709,240
Total yearly cost: $176,410
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table280. it is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Suspended solids in the waste, consisting mostly of grain and sprouts,
is assumed to be removed by screening prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.2 percent
SS: 83.1 percent
Alternative A 19-V - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 19-IV.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.11 kg/kkg (0.0053 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.06 kg/kkg (0.0029 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $761,830
Total yearly cost: $187,330
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 281. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Suspended solids in the waste, consisting mostly of grain and sprouts,
is assumed to be removed by screening prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.6 percent
SS: 92.2 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 301 .
Alternative A 19-VI - This alternative replaces spray irrigation of
sludge in Alternative A 19-IV with sand bed drying.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.22 kg/kkg (0.011 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0062 Ib/bu).
1048
-------
8
1176.5
b
CO
tn
8
LJ *i\.t
O
O
TO
f*
-:.;: «i.:c «?.•:? <;j.:c «i.:: <«.:: «».;; <7.cc
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 280
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A19-IV
(MALT)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR «ASTFiUTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.1. PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
ei
R.
C.
..CONTROL
..PUMPING
HOUSE
STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLUDGE THICKENER
R...AEROBIC DIGESTOR
Y...HOLDING TANK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTS?
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY,
562570,
34150,
56260,
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
COSTS!
LABOR
CHEMICALS
4. MAJNTENANCERSLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY
TOTAL
00
00
00
56260,00
709240.00
37480.
62790.
3030.
10990.
00
00
00
00
1H290.00
COSTS*
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 114290.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 28370.00
3. DEPRECIATION 33750.00
176410.00
1050
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 281
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A19-V
(MALT)
ITEMIZED COST SLMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5 PERCENT 800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT
BI
e.
c.
H9
K.
Y.
U.
s.
N.
.CONTROL HCLSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BA8IN
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AERCPIC DIGESTOR
.HOLDING TANK
.SPRAY IRRIGATION
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL. MEDIA PRESSURE PILTRA'N
INVESTMENT
CC8TSI
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSt
1. LABOR
2. POfcFR
3. CHEMICALS
a, MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIE3
TCTAL
600560.00
41150.00
60060.00
60060.00
761830.00
37060.00
66700.00
3030.00
11620.00
120630.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTS8
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 120830.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 30«70.00
3. DEPRECIATION 36030.00
TCTAL 187330.00
1051
-------
o
en
ro
>-
>-
i e s. C
OlC.tt
JSl.S
o
_l
. . . . . . . . .
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 301
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 19, ALTERNATIVE V
««.C6 10C.CS
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $971,480
Total yearly cost: $229,830
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 282. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Suspended solids in the waste, consisting mostly of grain and sprouts,
is assumed to be removed by screening prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.2 percent
SS: 83.1 percent
Alternative A 19-VII - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 19-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.11 kg/kkg (0.0053 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.06 kg/kkg (0.0029 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,017,070
Total yearly cost: $ 240,470
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 283. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Suspended solids in the waste, consisting mostly of grain and sprouts,
is assumed to be removed by screening prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.6 percent
SS: 92.2 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 302.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategorv A 20 - Wineries Without Stills
A model plant representative of subcategory A 20 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, ten alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide
for various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which
processes 180 kkg (200 tons) of grapes per day during crushing,
and produces 41 cu m (10,800 gal) per day during processing. Since
the treatment system was sized on crushing season design values, those
are the costs which will be presented.
The following process operations are assumed for the model plant:
(1) stems are considered a solid waste to be spread on vineyard
property,(2) pressed pomace may be used for distilling material,
1053
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 282
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A19-VI
(MALT)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.1 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES}
Bl
B.
C.
H.
K.
Q.
R.
Y.
T.
.CONTROL HCLSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC DIGESTCR
.HOLDING TANK
.SAND DRYING BEDS
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSJ
1. LABOH
2. POER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
775270.00
41150.00
77530.00
77530.00
971480.00
37480.00
61920.00
3030.00
42020.00
144450.00
144450.00
36860.00
46520.00
229830.00
1054
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 283
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A19-VII
(MALT)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESi
Bl
B.
C.
H.
K.
Q.
R.
Y.
T.
B.
N.
.CONTROL HOUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC DIGESTOR
.HOLDING TANK
.SAND DRYING BEDS
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS*
613360.00
41150,00
61330.00
81330.00
1017070.00
1. LABOR 37460.00
2. POWER 67830.00
3. CHEMICALS 3030.00
4. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES 42650.00
TOTAL 150990.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 150990.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 40680.00
3. DEPRECIATION 48800.00
TOTAL 240470,00
1055
-------
o
en
1 5 1 S . C
u.
o
7f2.il
W)
8
313.6
6«>5.7
i
1- 307.'
«5.ec
«6.ce
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 302
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 19, ALTERNATIVE VII
10C.CC
-------
DRAFT
may be spread on"vineyard property, or'may be recbverecTas a by-product
(3) diatomaceous earth (spent filter aid) is considered to be a solid
waste to be spread on vineyard property, (4) no distillation is done
on the premises, and (5) wastewater is screened prior to discharge.
Alternative A 20-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a
180 kkg (200.0 ton) per day plant is 276 cu m (0.073 MG) per day.
The BOD waste load is. 3.57 kg/kkg (7.14 Ib/ton), and the suspended
solids load is 1.16 kg/kkg (2.32 Ib/ton).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 20-11 - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, nutrient addition, neutralization, a complete mix
activated sludge system, sludge thickening, aerobic digestion, dual
media filtration, and spray irrigation of sludge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.77 kg/kkg (1.54 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.115 kg/kkg (0.230 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $414,130
Total yearly cost: $116,400
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 284 . It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.8 percent
SS: 90.1 percent
Alternative A 20-III - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 20-11.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.38 kg/kkg (0.76 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.0540 kg/kkg (0.108 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $434,350
Total yearly cost: $122,300
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 285. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits BOD: 98.9 percent
SS: 95.3 percent
1057
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 284
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-11
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY Fl'R M.STEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,.. 97.fi PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
INVESTMENT COSTS*
1.
i»
3.
B3
B.
C.
H.
I.
F.
G.
K.
0.
H.
Y.
U.
N'
CONTROL HCLSE
PUMP.IK'S S If A TICK
EQUALIZATION BASIN
NITROGEN ACDITIC*
PHCSPHCRLS ADDITION
ACID NFtTRiLIZATTO
CALSTIC NEUTRALIZATION
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
SLUDGE THICKENER
AfcROBIC DIGESTOR
HOLDING TANK
SPRAV IRRIGATION
DUAt Kf-DIA PRESSURE
LAND
ENGINEERING
CCNTIKRFNCY.
TOTAL
331230.00
16660.00
33120.00
33120.00
MM30.00
YEARLY OPERATING CUSTS:
1. LABOR 37480.00
2. POWEB 2?510.00
3. CHEMICALS 7530.00
a. MAlNTENANCEaStPPLIES ^auo.OO
TOTAL 79960.00
TOTAL YEARLV CC9TS:
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 79960.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 16570.00
3. DEPRECTATIOK 19870.00
TOTAL 116«OC.OO
1058
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 285
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-111
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDR foASTEMTFP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,., 98.Q PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
ei
8
c
H
I
F
G
K
Q
R
Y
I,
M
\
..CGMfiOL HCI..SF
..PL^'KP-G STATION
..EQl ALIZATIO BASIN
..NITRC'GFN ADDITION
..PHOSPHORUS ADD!
..ACID NEUTRALIZATION
..CAUSTIC NEUTRALIZATION
..ACTIVATED SLUDGE
..SLUDGE THICKENER
..AEROBIC DIGESTOR
..HOLDING TANK
..SPF.AY IRRIGATION
..HUH KFDIA PRESSLRF. FILTRA'N
..DUAL I^CIA PRESSURE FXLTRAU-
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
CCNSTRICTICN
?.. LAND
3. ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LABOR
2. FOFP
H. MAINTEN'AMCF.&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSi
1. YEARLY CPFPATIK6 CCST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST r.ECCVEPY
3.
TCTAL
,00
)0.00
34810,00
?6830.00
7530.00
10210.00
84050.00
64050.00
17370.00
20880.00
122300.00
1059
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 20-IV - This alternative provides in addition "to Alter-
native A 20-1II activated carbon.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.23 kg/kkg (0.46 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.031 kg/kkg (0.062 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $502,200
Total yearly cost: $146,770
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 286. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits BOD: 99.4 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 303.
Alternative A 20-V - This alternative replaces spray irrigation of sludge
in Alternative A 20-11 with sand drying beds.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.77 kg/kkg (1.54 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.115 kg/kkg (0.230 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $492,450
Total yearly cost: $134,160
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 287. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000perhectare ($16,600 per acre). It is
further assumed that three operators are required.
" Reduction Benefits BOD: 97.8 percent
SS: 90.1 percent
Alternative A 20-VI - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 20-V dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.38 kg/kkg (0.76 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.054 kg/kkg (0.108 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $512,680
Total yearly cost: $140,070
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 288. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits BOD: 98.9 percent
SS: 95.3 percent
1060
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 286
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-IV
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY' P«JB ^ASTEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
Pi . .eriMROL HOUSE
B...PULPING STATION
C. ,,EQUALIZATION BASIN
H,.,NITWCGEN ADDITION
I. ,. PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
G...CAUSTIC NEUTRALIZATION
K.
CO
R...AEP08IC OIGESTC*
V...HOLDING TANK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
N...DU«L MF.DIA PRESSURE
..ACTIVATED SLUDGE
...9LLDGE THICKENER
N...DU4U MEDIA PRESSURE
FILTPA'N
FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTS!
1.
2.
3.
a.
2...ACTIVATED CARBCN ADSCRPTION
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CCNTINQP.NCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
i. LABOR
2. FO^F^
3, CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCF&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
.00
16660.00
^0^60.00
40460.00
502300.00
37460.00
31770.00
753C.OO
25620.00
102400.00
TOTAL YEARUY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 102400.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 20090.00
3. DEPRECIATION 24280.00
TOTAL 146770.00
1061
-------
501.0
"•^
§
U.
O
(f)
i
«...
36*.
a
po
3=«
O
no
-
232.1
Ile.C
ll.Cf «i.CC «3. CC
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 287
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-V
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
COST SL^CASY FPP •«A.<3TF'*ATtrP TREATMENT
DESIGN EFFICIENCY. .. «7.P FF.RCFNT 8CR REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
eU.r.C^TPOL WCL8F
P...PULPING STATION'
C...cC"..ALI7»TKN PA5U
I", . .NilTKCGFN APDITION'
I.. .PHCS^HHRLS ADDITION
F...ACTD NFLTRAI.IZATION
C-...rALSTK NELTRALIZATICN
"...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
0,..?LLCGe THICKENER
P...AF.PCflir OICFS1CR
T...RASD DRYING BEDS
N...nUAL. MFCIA PRESSURE FILTRA'I
INVESTMENT CCSTS!
1. CCN'ST^UCTICN 393720.00
•( t LANn 19990.00
3. eMPTKEEPIMG 39370.00
a. CCMTINGENCV 35370.00
YEAPLY CPEPATINfG COSTS?
1. LABOR 37^480.00
2. PO'FP 2«6*0.00
3. CHEMICAL'S 7530.00
«. HAINTf-NANCFlSLPPLlES 21170.00
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY CPEHATJNG CCST 906^0.00
2 . Y F. 4 P L v T N V F S T M F N T
CGST PFCOVFRY 19700.00
3. C'r0RFCT ATITN 23620.00
TCT^L 13«160.00
1063
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 288 '
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-VI
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
Z F P COST 81 ^ K A P Y r > c wASTFMTEH TBEA7VFM CM IN
PESIGN FFFICTENCY... ^F.9 PPRCEM BOH KECl-C
TREATMENT MCDlLESt
r . . . F <"J I U I 7 A T I r N M 5 I *
H. ,.N'TT«rjGEN ACOTITO'^
I. ..PHfSPHnpi, .{. ACCITICN
^...M.TC NFLTP4LTZATIT.K
G...CALST1C NEIT&AL1ZATICN
K,..ACTTVATEC SLLOC-E
T...8AND D»YINP FEDS
KEDIA PRESSURE
A FPESSLhE
INVESTMENT CTSTSl
1. CTNSTRlJCTTCN 'J10570.00
2. LAND 19990.00
3.
41060.00
TCTAL 5
YEARLY OPERATING
1. LABCM 37a?O.OP
2. FG»»IFR 27980.00
3. C H E * I'C * I f 7530.00
4. f-ATNJTEVANCE8SLPpLTES 21940.00
TCTAL 94930.00
TCTAL VEA»Ly CCSTc.
1, YEARLY CFFPATIKC- CCS^ °i'930.0f>
c. V&ARIY INV(-'ST^FNT
CCST RECCVFKV '0510.OH
3, PFPRFCTATIPK- 24630.00
TTTM U007G.OO
1064
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 20-VII - This alternative adds activated carbon to
Alternative A 20-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.23 kg/kkg (0.46 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.031 kg/kkg (0.062 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $580,520
Total yearly cost: $164,530
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 289. It is
assumed that land, costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits BOD: 99.4 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 304.
Alternative A 20^VlTl - This alternative provides flow equalization,
nutrient addition, neutralization, an aerated lagoon system, and dual
media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.77 kg/kkg (1.54 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.115 kg/kkg (0.230 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $413,090
Total yearly cost: $172,300
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table290. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits BOD: 97.8 percent
SS: 90.1 percent
Alternative A 20-IX - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 20-VIII dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.38 kg/kkg (0.76 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.054 kg/kkg (0.108 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $433,290
Total yearly cost: $178,210
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 291, It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits BOD: 98.9 percent
SS: 95.3 percent
1065
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 289
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-VII
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SLMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 90.3 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
Bi. .CONTROL HOUSE
8...PULPING STATTCN
C...FQLALIZATICN BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
G...CAUSTIC NEUTRALIZATION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...5LUOGE THICKENER
R...AERCBTC CIGESTOR
T...SAND DRYING BEDS
N...DUAL MFrjA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
N...DU*L MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
Z...ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION.
CCN3TRLCTICN1
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
467110.00
19990.00
«6710.00
46710.00
S80520.OP
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTS?
LAPOP
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTFNANCERSUPPLIES
TOTAL
CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
37460.
30930.
00
00
7530.00
37340.00
113280.00
113280.00
.00
28030.00
364530.00
1066
-------
fc
I
<
D
t-t'
CO
o
u
«>^.J
O
73
u
13-.0
It.r.S
.CO 1CS.CS
FIGURE 304
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 20, ALTERNATIVE VII
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 290
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-VIII
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDR MSTFMTFR TREATMENT CHAIN.*
DESIGN EFFICIENCY. .. 97.P PERCFNT 80P "EDUCTION
TREATMENT
R... PUMPING STATION
C...PQLALI7ATICN BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHCSPHORLS ADDITION
F...ACTO NEUTRALIZATION
G...CAUSTIC NEITRALIZATICN •
L ...AERATED LAGCGN
N...OUAL HFDIA PRESSURE FILT«A.'N
INVESTMENT
CCSTSI
i.
2.
3.
CCNSTRUCTTCK
5. PVC
TOTAL
LINER
333^80,
"330,
33350,
33350,
YEARLY OPERATING I
1.
2 •
3.
«.
5.
LAROR
CHEMICALS
KAINTF.MNCERSIPPLTES
PVC LINER
TCTAL
3.
TCTAL
00
00
00
00
8580.00
00
00
00
on
oo
12490.
102900.
7530.
12230
190
135340.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSI
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 1353^0.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
OECCVERY . 16520.00
172300.00
1068
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 291
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-IX
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
ZFD COST SUMMARY FOR MSTF.MTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 98. li PFRCPN'T 300 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULE?:
B. ,.Pl.'^F-ING STATION
C...EULAL17ATICN 8ASIK-
H...NITHPGEK APCITION
I...PHCSPHDRLS ADDITION
F...ACIO NFUTRALI2ATICN
G...CALSTIC WELTRALIZATICN
L... AERATED
^...^UAL NJF
N...nUAL
LAPOCN
IA FRFSSbPE
IA PRESSURE
FJLTPA«N
FILTRA'M
CCSTS:
i.
2.
3.
a.
5.
COSTP'JCTIO1
LAM])
EKGJMEER1NG
CC•^iTI^:GF^'^Y
PVC LTNKR
350320.00
4330.00
35030.00
35030
85PO
00
00
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
s!
CCSTS:
LAE-OR
CHEMICALS
KATJTEMANCE&SLPPLIES
PVC UTNFR
TCTAL
433290.00
124
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 20-X - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 20-IX activated carbon.
The resulting BOD waste 'load is 0.23 kg/kkg (0.46 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.031 kg/kkg (0.062 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $501,160
Total yearly cost: $202,670
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 292. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.4 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 305.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 21 - Wineries with Stills
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 21 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, two alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels
of waste reductions for the model plant which processes 700 kkg (760 ton)
of grapes per day.
Alternative A 21-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no reduction
in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a 700 kkg
(760 ton) per day plant is 1700 cu m (0.442 MG) per day. The BOD waste
load is 13.9 kg/kkg (27.7 Ib/ton), and the suspended solids load is
13.6 kg/kkg (27.3 Ib/ton).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 21-11 - This alternative consists of a holding tank, pumping
station, pipeline, and land spreading.
The resulting BOD waste load is zero, and the suspended solids load is
zero.
Costs: Total investment cost: $381,640
Total yearly cost: $ 52,310
1070
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 292
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 20-X
(WINERIES WITHOUT STILLS)
ITEMIZFD COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTFR TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9Q.3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
G
L
2.
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.NITROGEN- ADDITION
.PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
.ACID NEUTRALIZATION
.CAUSTIC NEUTRALIZATION
.AERATED LAGCON
.nuAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED TARPON ADSORPTION
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
CCNTINGFNCY
PVC LINER
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
Um
5.
CCSTS»
LAROR
CHEMICAi.S
K4IMTEIMANCF&SUPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL YEARLY
TCTAL
CCSTSt
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPPECIATICN
TOTAL
40690.00
8580.00
501160.00
12490.00
109170.00
7530.00
28400.00
190.00
157780.00
157780.00
20050.00
24840.00
202670.00
1071
-------
5
o
-fr".. '
i
o
«>J
ro
V)
8
Z'5-.O •
I
I
I
I
oe.ro «i.cs
««.es ico.oc
FIGURE 305
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 20, ALTERNATIVE X
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 293. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
. SS: 100 percent
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategory A 22 - Grain Distillers Operating Sttllage
Recovery Systems
Two model plants representative of Subcategory A 22 were developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, nine alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for model plant A 22-A which pro-
duces 380 kkg (15,000 bu) per day.
Alternative A 22-A-I - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 380 kkg (15,000 bu) per day plant is 2500 cu m (0.650 MG) per day.
The BOD waste load is 6.02 kg/kkg (0.336 Ib/bu), and the suspended
solids load is 4.21 kg/kkg (0.236 Ib/bu).
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 22-A-II - This alternative provides flow equalization,
nutrient addition, and an aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.015 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,231,320
Total yearly cost: $ 602,940
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 294. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.7 percent
SS: 92.3 percent
Alternative A 22-A-III - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 22-A-II dual media filtration.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 293
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 21-11
(WINERIES WITH STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FC* WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAI\
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT PRO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
V...HOLOI(vG TANK
B...PUPPING STATION
*...PIPELINE
CONSTRUCTION!
LAMP
ENGINEERING
CGNTI\'RFNlCY
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTSt
LABOR
CHEMICALS
MAJNTFKANCERSUPPLIES
TCTAL
275QOO.OO
51fe
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 294
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-A-II
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOF WASTEi*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.7 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
e...PUMPING STATION
C...F&IALIZATICN BASTN
H...NITRCGEN ADDITION*
I...PHCSPHORUS ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGCON
INVESTMENT CCSTSj
1.
2.
3.
«.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TCTAL
YEARLY GPEPATING CCSTSl
983780.00
12990.00
9fl380.00
98380.00
37790.00
1231320.00
1.
2.
3.
LABOR 12^90.00
PCWER ^33320.00
CNF.MICA.LS 6950.00
MAINTENANCE8SUPPLIES 38^20.00
PVC LINER 1590.00
TCTAL
49277G.OO
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST «92770.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY a925C.OO
3. DEPRECIATION 60920.00
TCTAL 602940.00
1075
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is Q.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.016 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,276,250
Total yearly cost: $ 613,420
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 295. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.8 percent
SS: 96.9 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 306.
Alternative A 22-A-IV - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, a complete mix activated sludge system, sludge thickening,
aerobic digestion, and sand drying beds.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.015 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,230,170
Total yearly cost: $ 289,080
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 296. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.7 percent
SS: 92.3 percent
Alternative A 22-A-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 22-A-IV dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $1,275,110
Total yearly cost: $ 299,560
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 297. It is assumed
that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It is further
assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
1076
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 295
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE .A 22-A-III
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEMIZFD COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.8 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MQDULESi
B.
C.
H.
I.
L.
B.
N.
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
.AERATED LAGOON
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINEH
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
2
3
1021230.00
12990.00
102120.00
102120.00
37790.00
1276250.00
CHEMICALS
MAINTEN'ANCESSUPPL'IES
PVC LINER
TCTAL
12490.00
439140.00
6950.00
39040.00
1590.00
499210.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 499210.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY 51050.00
3. DEPRECIATION 63160.00
TOTAL 613420.00
1077
-------
o
i e: 7. c
8
^•s
>~
4
* T 2 .0
U
«e.co
FIGURE 306
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 22-A-III
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 296
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-A-IV
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEMIZED CDST SLMMARY FOR MSTEHATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.7 PEPCENT nCD REIH'C
TREATMENT MGOLLESi
81..CONTROL *CLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
C...£QL'ALIZATirN BASIN
(-...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHCSPHCRUS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLLCGE THICKENER
P...AEROBIC UIPESTOR
T...SAND .DRYING 8EDS
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
2. LAND
3 • E NGif
4. CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS?
1.
3. CHEMICALS
4. MA
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY TPE»ATING
a. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECOVERY
3. OFPRFCIiTION
TCTAL
985360.00
47730.00
9B540.00
1230170.00
37^80.00
6950.00
57870.00
180750.00
160750.00
59120.00
239080.0"
1079
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 297
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-A-V
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR fcASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.P PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES.!
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1. CONSTRUCTION
2. LAND
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
81.. CONTROL HOUSE
e...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
o...SLUDGE THICKENEW
R,..AEFC«1C DIGESTCR
T...SANO DRYING BEDS
R...PUMPING STATION
N...OUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
102^620.00
47730.
102280.
00
00
TCTAU
102280.00
1275110.00
37^80.00
8^270.00
6950.00
58490.00
167190.00
TOTAL
COSTS:
i. YEARLY OPERATING CCST ie7i9o.oo
2. YEARLY INVFSTKENT
CCST PcCf-VEPv 51000.00
3. DtPKECIATICK 61370.00
TOTAL
P99560.00
1080
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.8 percent
SS: 96.9 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 307.
Alternative A 22-A-VI - This alternative replaces sand drying beds in
Alternative A 22-A-IV wtth vacuum filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.015 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $839,260
Total yearly cost: $221,570
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 298. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.7 percent
SS: 92.3 percent
Alternative A 22-A-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 22-A-VI dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $884,220
Total yearly cost: $232,060
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 299. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.8 percent
SS: 96.9 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 308.
Alternative A 22-A-VIII - This alternative replaces the sand drying
beds in Alternative A 22-A-IV with spray irrigation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.26 kg/kkg (0.015 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $838,600
Total yearly cost: $212,850
1081
-------
c
OC
IM
0)
a
b
I
a
o
4
7*2.5 '
i
i
eSJ.S i
I
3 ;
•-1 3*7.7 i
rf i
O '
I
8««.C i
«J.CC
«7.CO S6.CO
ICO.50
FIGURE 307
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 22-A-V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 298
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-A-VI
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FCR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.7 'PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MQDULESf
81
B,
C.
H.
I.
K.
8.
R.
S.
Y.
.CONTROL HCLSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.NITROGEN ArOITION
.PHGSPHCK.ljS ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLLDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC CIGESTOP
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
CCN3TBUCTICN
LAND
EKGTMFfRING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1.
, 2.
3. CHEMICALS
a. MAINTFNAN'CE&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
660510.00
46650.00
66050.00
66050.00
839260.00
37«80.00
83060.00
12700.00
15130.00
148370.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
i. YEARLY CPERATJKG COST j«837o.oo
2. YEAFLY I^VEST^ENT
COPT RECOVERY 33570.00
3. DEPPECTATION 39630.00
TOTAL
221570.00
1083
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 299
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-A-VII
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ("ASTEMTFR TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... Q7.8 PERCENT PCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESj
Bl
B.
C.
H.
I.
K
s
Y(
P
..CONTROL HCLSE
..PUMPING STATION'
..EQUALIZATION BASIN
..NITROGEN ADDITION
. .PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
..ACTIVATED SLUDGc
..SLIDGE THICKENER
..AEROBIC DIGESTOfi
..VACUUM FILTRATION
..HOLD TNG TANK
..PUMPING STATION
..DUAL *EDIA PRESSURE
FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
5.
ENGINEERING
CCNTIKGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS;
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
fi. V^INTE
TOTAL
697970.00
46650.00
69800.00
69800.00
684220.00
37460.00
68860.00
12700.00
15750.00
15^810.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. VEARLY CPSPATUG CCST i54gio.oo
2. YEAPLV INVESTMENT
COST KECGVESY ?5370.00
3. DEPKFCIATIOK iJiePO.OO
TrTAL 232060.00
1084
-------
; ,C
75?.2
u
«r.se «e.co ««.oo
FIGURE 308
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 22-A-VII
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 300. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduciton Benefits: BOD: 95.7 percent
SS: 92.3 percent
Alternative A 22-A-IX - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 22-A-VIII dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $863,810
Total yearly cost: $219,710
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 301. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assuems screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.8 percent
SS: 96.9 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 309.
Model plant B produces 90 kkg (3500 bu) per day.
Alternative A 22-B-I - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a
90 kkg (3500 bu) per day plant is 570 cu m (0.15 MG) per day. The
BOD waste load is 5.99 kg/kkg (0.335 Ib/bu), and the suspended solids
load is 4.23 kg/kkg (0.237 Ib/bu).
I
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
1086
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 300
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-A-VIII
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEKIZFD COST 8LVMARY FC'R *.ASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.7 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES}
Bi..CONTROL HOUSE
P....PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION SASIN
H...NITRnGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
(T... SLUDGE THICKENER
R...AERCPIC C1GESTCR
Y...HOLDING TAM<
U...SPPAV IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENC]NFE«ING
CCMIKGEMCV
667600
60760,
00
00
00
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
1. LABOR
3, CHEMICALS
TOTAL
66760.00
838600.00
37U80.00
79330.00
6950.00
15^90.00
139250.00
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTS:
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST is^so.oo
2. VE.ARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 33540.oo
3. DEPRECIATION 4G060.00
TOTAL
21P650.00
1087
-------
JRAFT
TABLE 301
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-A-IX
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY SYSTEMS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.*
KA3TEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESt
81
.CONTROL HCISE
P.. .PULPING STATION
C...EC1LALIZATICN BASIN
H... NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHCSPHDRUS ADDITION
K,., ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G... SLUDGE THICKENER
«... AEROBIC DI6ESTOP
v... HOLDING TANK
U... SPRAY IRRIGATION
B... PUMPING STATION
N...PUAI M.FDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
«. CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR
2. PCWFR
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SIPPLIES
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS*
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
668610.00
37480.00
68660.00
68860.00
863810.00
37480,
835
-------
8
53*.C
LU
3 '. i . C
02.::
tsc.ce
FIGURE 309
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 22-A-IX
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 22-B-II - This alternative provides flow equalization,
nutrient addition, and an aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $348,170
Total yearly cost: $132,190
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 302. It ts
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
SS: 92.5 percent
Alternative A 22-B-III - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 22-B-II dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $373,380
Total yearly cost: $139,050
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 303. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 96.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 310.
Alternative A 22-B-IV - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, a complete mix activated sludge system, sludge thickening,
aerobic digestion, and sand drying beds.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $332,290
Total yearly cost: $ 97,130
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 304. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
1090
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 302
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-B-II
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR fcASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.., 95.fi PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MQDULESi
.PULPING STATION
.F.QIALIZATICN BASIN
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
.AERATED LAGOON
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTSt
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCEiSLFPLlES
PVC LTNER
TOTAL
CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY
2. YEARLY
COST
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
OPERATING COST
INVESTMENT
279500.00
4830.00
27950.
27950.
00
00
7940.00
348170.00
6250.00
82700.00
1860.00
9900
380
00
00
101090.00
101090.00
13930.00
17170.00
132190.00
1091
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 303
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-B-III
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FQP
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97. 9
MSTEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
8...PULPING STATION
C...EQLALIZATirN PASIN
H...NITROGEN. ADDITION
I...PHCSPHPRIS ADDITION
t...Afe-pATED LAGOON
S... PULPING STATION
M
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS}
1.
2.
3.
a.
b.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
FVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
TOTAL YEARLY
COSTS;
LABOR
PO'ER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANTERSLPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
COSTS•
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
300510.00
4830.00
30050.00
3 0 0 5 0 . C 0
7940.00
373380.00
6250.
86960.
I860,
10230,
00
00
00
00
380.00
105680.00
105680.00
.00
18430,00
139050.00
1092
-------
O
to
CO
(/)
5
30!.i
?77.2
§ 2SJ-"
>- 2?*.$
Q ?
O
I
t-4
n
U
FIGURE 310
INVESTTtNT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 22-B-III
jce.:s
-------
DKAH
TABLE 304
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-B-IV
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FQP WASTEMTEff TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.8 PERCENT POD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCOULESj
B1,,CQMRCL HCLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...FHOSPHORLS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...SLLOGF THICKENER
P...AEPCRir. CIGESTCR
T...SAND DRYING
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCNSTRICTTCK
CCNTIN6FNCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
2. PCWF.H
3. CHEMICALS
«. MAINTF>'4NCERSLPPLIES
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY fCSTSl
1. YEAPLY CPERATIKG CCST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RPCCVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
263720.00
15830.00
26370.00
26370.00
332290.00
37a80.
19760.
I860.
00
00
00
8920.00
68020.00
66020.00
13290.00
15820.00
97130.00
1094
-------
URAFT
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
SS: 92.5 percent
Alternative A 22-B-V - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment chain in Alternative A 22-B-IV.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $357,500
Total yearly cost: $103,990
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 305. It is assumed
that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It is further
assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 96.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 311.
Alternative A 22-8-VI - This alternative replaces sand dryinq beds in
Alternative A 22-B-IV with vacuum filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $387,710
Total yearly cost: $106,650
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 306. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
-SS: 92.5 percent
Alternative A 22-B-VII - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 22-B-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $412,920
Total yearly cost: $113,510
1095
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 305
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-B-V
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WA8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.., 97.9 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
P1..CGMTROL MCLSE
H... PUMPING STATION
C...EOLALIZATICN BASIN
H...NITROGFN ADDITION
I. . .PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLUDGE THICKENER
P...AERLSIC DIGESTCR
T...SAND DRYING 8EHS
B...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FRTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCNSTPUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTS?
LABOR
PCWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1, YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
28«730(
15830,
28470,
28470,
00
00
00
00
357500.00
37400.
24020.
00
00
1860.00
9250.00
72610.00
72610.00
14300.00
17080.00
103990.00
1096
-------
W
371. «
°- i31 I
S! ? 3 , !
.
°7.C
«i.oc r.2.:c «j.:t «;.::
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 306
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE .A 22-B-VI
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.8 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
31
B.
.CONTROL HCLSE
.PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H,..NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLLnRE THICKENER
«...AEROBIC CIGESTOR
8...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
CCSTSt
LABOR
PfkER
CHEMICALS
4. MAJNTFNANCE&SLPPLlfcS
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
296720.00
31650.
?9fc70.
00
00
29670.00
387710.00
37480.00
22000.00
4350.00
9S10.00
73340.00
733^0.00
15510.00
17800.00
106650.00
1098
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 307. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to .discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 96.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 312.
Alternative A 22-B-VIII - This alternative replaces the sand drying
beds in Alternative A 22-B-IV with spray irrigation.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.25 kg/kkg (0.014 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.32 kg/kkg (0.018 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $388,320
Total yearly cost: $102,870
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 308. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
SS: 92.5 percent
Alternative A 22-B-IX - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 22-B-VIII.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.13 kg/kkg (0.0073 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.16 kg/kkg (0.0090 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $404,360
Total yearly cost: $107,620
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 309. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
The model plant assumes screening of the effluent prior to discharge.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 96.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 313.
1099
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 307
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-B-VIJ
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUGARY FCJR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTICN
TREATMENT MCDULESt
Bl..CONTROL HCLSE
fi...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPhORLS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
G...SLUDGE THICKENER
..AERCPir DIGESTCR
..VACUUM FILTRATION
s.
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION
N...ntjAi MEDIA PRESSURE FRTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERIN6
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS*
1. LA30R
2. PC*E*
3. CHEMICALS
U. VAI
TOTAL
317730.00
31650.00
31770.00
31770.00
412920.00
37aeo.oo
26260.00
4350.00
9840.00
77930.00
TCTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 77930.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 16520.00
3. DEPRECIATION 19060.00
TOTAL 113510.00
1100
-------
«IJ.O I
JPJ.J
z
I— I
>- 22?. e
QJ
<
u
1'p.l
SC6.C
99.00 ISO.00
FIGURE 312
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 22-B-VI-VII
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 308
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-B-VIII
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR K
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 309
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 22-B-IX
(GRAIN DISTILLERS OPERATING STILLAGE RECOVERY)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...
-------
<
(J
2SJ.8 I
!*•?.»
7. cc
105. co
FIGURE 313
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 22-B-VII-IX
-------
DRAFT
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 23 - Grain Distillers Not Operating SttlIs
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 23 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, five alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide
for various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which
produces 50 kkg (2000 bu) per day.
Alternative A 23-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 50 kkg (2000 bu) per day plant is 91 cu m (0.024 MG) per day. The
BOD waste load is 0.38 kg/kkg (0.021 Ib/bu), and the suspended solids
load is 0.29 kg/kkg (0.016 Ib/bu).
•
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 23-11 - This alternative provides a pumping station
and aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.06 kg/kkg (0.0034 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.07 kg/kkg (0.0039 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $133,720
Total yearly cost: $ 28,200
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 310. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 85.7 percent
SS: 75.0 percent
Alternative A 23-1II - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 23-11 dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.03 kg/kkg (0.0017 Ib/bu), and the
suspended solids load is 0.04 kg/kkg (0.0022 Ib/bu).
Costs: Total investment cost: $149,750
Total yearly cost: $ 32,940
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 311. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 92.9 percent
SS: 87.5 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 314.
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 310
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 23-11
(GRAIN DISTILLERS NOT OPERATING STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 65.7 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESi
B.,.PUMPING STATION
K...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGOON
INVESTMENT COSTS;
1.
2.
3.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
CCSTSl
LABOK
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCES SUPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CIST HF.CTVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
105670.00
"5330.00
10570.00
10570.00
3560.00
133720.00
6250.00
5170.00
60.00
4790.00
60.00
16330,00
16330.00
5350.00
6520.00
28200.00
1106
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 311
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 23-111
(GRAIN DISTILLERS NOT OPERATING STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 92.
-------
o
00
tfo.o
(f) 117.1
° »«.»
fe
(n
i ni.«
let.
2
1-1
I-
^
~ 54.•
n.«
10.eo M.IO »a.»o
«T.»O
«0.iO fl.TO 41.00
FIGURE 314
INVESTMEr^T AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 23-1II
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 23-IV - This alternative provides in addition to Alterna-
tive A 23-11 spray irrigation.
The resulting BOD waste load is zero, and the suspended solids load
is zero.
Costs: Total investment cost: $224,040
Total yearly cost: $ 70,590
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 312. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 315.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 24 - Molasses Distillers
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 24 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives.
In Section VII, nine alternatives were selected as being applicable
engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various
levels of waste reductions for the model plant which produces 30,000
pg per day.
Alternative A 24-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a
30,000 pg per day plant is 818 cu m (0.216 MG) per day. The BOD
waste load is 969 kg/1000 pg (2140 lb/1000 pg), and the suspended
solids load is 183 kg/1000 pg (403 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 24-11 - This alternative consists of concentrating high
strength molasses slops (stillage) by multi-effect evaporation, and then
treating evaporator condensate and all other wastes with a treatment
chain consisting of a control house, a pumping station, flow equalization,
nutrient addition, a complete mix activated sludge system, sludge thick-
ening, aerobic digestion, vacuum filtration, sludge storage and truck
hauling. Evaporation is predicted to have an investment cost of $2,193,310
and a yearly cost of $609,620. Evaporation is assumed to remove 97 per-
cent of the BOD and 99 percent of the suspended solids from high strength
wastes. Two day storage of distilling slops and seven day storage of
molasses by-product is provided, and all necessary pumping equipment is
included.
1109
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 312
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 23-IV
(GRAIN DISTILLERS NOT OPERATING STILLS)
ITEMIZED COST SUGARY FOP WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY..,100.0 PE«CFM BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
R...PUKPTNG STATION
h. ..NITNGC-EN AOCITICN
I...PHCSPHr.RL!S ADDITION
L... AERATED L AGCCN
Y. , .HOLT* I Mf; TANK
L...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTSJ
1.
2.
3.
a.
s.
CTMSTRLTTICK
LAND
E^GIMPFPING
CCNTINGENCY
PVC LTNFf'
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS:
1. LABOR
2. Pr.iNEP
3. CHEMICALS
5. PVC LINER
TCTH
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS?
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2, YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST HECCVFPY
3. OEPRECIAUCN
1CTAI
17^270.00
11330.00
17430.00
1 7 a 3 0 . 0 0
3580.00
224040.00
37480.00
6130.00
60.00
7260.00
60.00
509<5G.OO
50990.00
8960.CO
10640.00
70590.00
1110
-------
£
3
(J?.C I
I
I
O
70
8
*^
>-
>-
Q
<
O
U
i r , C '.
ics.cs
FIGURE 315
AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 23-IV
-------
URAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.16 kg/1000 pg (2.56 lb/1000 pg), and
the suspended solids load is 0.69 kg/1000 pg (1.52 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,644,060
Total yearly cost: $ 698,640
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 313. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
It is recognized that, although not included in the above costs, add-
itional boiler and cooling capacity may be required for evaporation.
Cost recovery from saleable by-products is not reflected in the costs.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.6 percent
Alternative A 24-1II - This alternative consists of adding dual media
filtration to the treatment chain in Alternative A 24-11.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.58 kg/1000 pg (1.28 lb/1000 pg), and
the suspended solids load is 0.35 kg/1000 pg (0.77 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,671,130
Total yearly cost: $ 705,710
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 314. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.8 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 316.
Alternative A 24-IV - This alternative replaces vacuum filtration in
Alternative A 24-11 with spray irrigation of sludge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.16 kg/1000 pg (2.56 lb/1000 pg), and
the suspended solids load is 0.69 kg/1000 pg (1.52 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,638,610
Total yearly cost: $ 692,540
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 315. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.6 percent
1112
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 313
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-II
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP &ASTEMTEH TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 9".8 PERCENT PCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
91.. CONTROL, HftSE
P. . .PUMF-.ING STATION
FI..MULTIPLE EFFECT
Y... HOLD ING TANK
P...PUMPING STATION
Y...HOLD ING TANK
e...PUMPING STATIC
8...PULPING STATION
C...EQUAI IZATICN BASIN
H. . .NITROGEN ADDITION
I. . .PHTSPHOrtLS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLLDGt
c...SLUDGE THICKENEF
R....AERCPIC RIGESTCR
s...VACUUM FILTRATION
TJG TAM<
EVAPORATOR
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
CONSTRUCTION
2. LAND
3. ENGINEERING
a. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
2181 160.00
26660.00
218120.00
218120.00
26U4060.00
YEARLY
OPERATING COSTS:
1. LA30S 7^970.00
2. rCwER 339170.00
3, CHEMICALS 7350.00
u. MAINTFNANCE&SLPPLIES «052o.oo
TOTAL /462010.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSt
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST a62010.00
2. YEASL> INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 105760.00
3. DEPRECIATION 130870.00
TOTAL 6986^0.00
1113
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 314
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-III
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUGARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.9 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESt
Bl..CONTROL HCIJSE
6...PULPING STATION
Fl..MULTIPLE EFFECT EVAPORATOR
Y...HOLDING TANK
6...PUMPING STATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATIC^
e...PijyP!NG STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLUDGE THICKENER
R...AERCBIC D1GESTCR
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTPA'N
INVESTMENT COST?!
1 .
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
2203730.00
26660.00
220370.00
220370.00
2671130.00
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 7«970.00
2. POER 343450.00
3. CHEMICALS 7350.00
4. MAINTENANCERSLPPLIES 40870.00
TOTAL "66640.'00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS*
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 466640.oo
2. YEARLY INVESTMFNT
COST RECOVERY 106850.00
3. DEPRECIATION 132220.00
i. 705710.00
-------
I
20SJ.1 I
I
I
I
Tl
cn
<»c.cc «t.co
«J.c:
: «o,oc «7.oo
*f !C!E'-C»
FIGURE 316
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 24-11 1
99.00 100.00
-------
JRAFT
TABLE 315
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-IV
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR niASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCOUlESi
81..CONTROL HCLSE
e...PUFFING STATION
Fl..MULTIPLE EFFECT
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
h...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
0...8LL-DGE THICKENER
R...AEROBIC CIGESTOR
Y...HOLDING TANK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
EVAPORATOR
INVESTMENT COSTS?
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
2183560.00
18330.00
216360.00
216360.00
2636610.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
a.
COSTS;
LABOR
POER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
74970.00
337450.00
4390.00
39180.00
455990.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCST£l
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 455990.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RF.CCVERY 105540.00
3. DEPRECIATION 131010,00
TOTAL
692540.00
1116
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 24-V - This alternative provides in addition to Alternative
A 24-IV dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.58 kb/1000 pg (1.28 lb/1000 pg), and the
suspended solids load is 0.35 kg/1000 pg (0.77 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,665,690
Total yearly cost: $ 699,620
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 316. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.8 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 317.
Alternative A 24-VI - This alternative replaces vacuum filtration in
Alternative A 24-11 with sand drying beds.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.16 kg/1000 pg (2.56 lb/1000 pg), and
the suspended solids load is 0.69 kg/1000 pg (1.52 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,759,100
Total yearly cost: $ 718,490
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 317. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.6 percent
Alternative A 24-VII - This alternative adds dual media filtration to
Alternative A 24-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.58 kg/1000 pg (1.28 lb/1000 pg), and
the suspended solids load is 0.35 kg/1000 pg (0.77 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,786,170
Total yearly cost: $ 725,560
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 318. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.8 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 318.
1117
-------
DKAfr
TABLE 316
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-V
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN'EFFICIENCY... 09.9 PERCENT eoo REDUCTION
TREATMFNT MODULES!
Bl
e.
FI
Y.
B.
Y.
B.
B.
C.
H.
I.
K.
G.
R.
Y.
U.
N.
.CONTROL HCUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.MULTIPLE EFFECT
.MOLDING TANK
.PUMPING
.HOLDING
.PUMPING
EVAPCRATCR
STATION
TANK
STATION
PUMPING STATION
EQUALIZATION BASIN
NITROGEN ADDITION
PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
SLl'CGE THICKENER
AEROBIC DIGESTOR
HOLDING TANK
SPRAY IRRIGATION
DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS:
i •
?.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR
2. PO'FR
3. CHEMICALS
a. MAINTEfUNCES-SUPPLlES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
2206140.00
18330,00
820610.00
220610.0.0
2665690.00
74970.00
341730.00
4390.00
39530.00
460620.00
460620.00
106630.00
132370.00
699620.00
-------
1L
O
.9
8
1431.8
O 1020.4
e s i. 7
•e«.s >
f£.CO
Ifflfll^tl
FIGURE 317
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 24-V
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 317
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-VI
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,.. 99.8 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
81.. CONTROL HCUSE
B... PUSHING STATION
FI.. MULTIPLE EFFECT EVAPORATOR
Y... HOLDING TANK
B... PULPING
Y...HGLRING
B... PUMPING
6. ..PUMPING
C... EQUALIZATION BASIN
H... NITROGEN ADDITION
i...pHcs°H9Rus ADDITION
*... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
O...SLI.-OGE THICKENER
P...Afci»CPIC OIGE8TCF
T...SAND DRYING REDS
STATION
TANK
STATION
STATION
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
3. ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
2260360.00
22660.00
22fiO«0.00
228040.00
2759100.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTS:
LABCR
CHEMICALS
MAIN7ENANCE8SLPPLIES
74970,
336600,
4390
00
00
00
TCTAL
55350.00
471310.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 471310.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST HFCCVERY 110360.00
3. DEPRECIATION 136820.00
TOTAL 718490.00
1120
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 318
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-VII
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR toASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.9 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
.CONTROL HOUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.MULTIPLE EFFECT
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING
.HOLDING
.PUMPING
EVAPCRATCR
STATION
TANK
STATION
.PUVPJNG STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC DIGESTOR
.SAND DRYING BEDS
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CQSTSt
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTFMANCE&SIPPLIFS
TOTAL
2302930.00
22660.00
230290.00
230290.00
2786170.00
00
00
74970.
340880.
4390.00
55690.00
475930.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCST£;
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 47^930.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 111450.00
3. TEPRECIATinN 136180.00
TOTAL 725560,00
1121
-------
ro
ro
8
b
co
co
8
i
!
> i s. e i
i
i
i
Hi'I.2 I
I
I
i
'.««•£,« I
U \:**,o
tf«.0
<2.co
FIGURE 318
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 24-VII
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 24-VIII - This alternative replaces the activated sludge
and sludge handling modules in Alternative A 24-11 with an aerated
lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.16 kg/1000 pg (2.56 lb/1000 pg), and
the suspended solids load is 0.69 kg/1000 pg (1.52 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,665,800
Total yearly cost: 800,510
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 319. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.6 percent
i
Alternative A 24-IX - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 24-VIII dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.58 kg/1000 pg (1.28 lb/1000 pg), and
the suspended solids load is 0.35 kg/1000 pg (0.77 lb/1000 pg).
Costs: Total investment cost: $2,692,880
Total yearly cost: $ 807,580
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 320. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that six operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 99.9 percent
SS: 99.8 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 319.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 25 - Bottling and Blending of Beverage Alcohol
Two model plants representative of Subcategory A 25 were developed
in Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives.
In Section VII, three alternatives were selected as being applicable
engineering alternatives for each model plant. These alternatives
provide for various levels of waste reductions for the model plants.
Model plant A produces a flow of 4 cu m/day (0.001 MGD).
Alternative A 25-A-I - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 319
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-VIII
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP MSTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.fi PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES}
Pi ..CONTROL HCLSE
P, . .PUFFING STATION
FI..MULTIPLE EFFECT
V...HOI.CINC TANK
e...PUMP.TNG
v.. .HOLDING
EVAPORATOR
PUMPING
STATION
TANK
STATION
STATION
C...FQLALIZATICN: BASIN
H...MTRC6FN ADDITION
T...PHrSPHORLS ADDITION
L...AERATES LAPCOM
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
2.
3.
a.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
1. LABOR
3! CHEMICALS
5. PVC LINER
TCTAL
2206570.00
5630.00
220660.00
2206*0.00
12080.00
2665800.00
74970.00
"37430.00
.00
.00
450.00
5608*0.00
TCTAL YEARLY COSTS:
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST 56oeso.oo
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 106630.00
3. DEPRECIATION 133000.00
TOTAL
800510.00
1124
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 320
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A24-IX
(MOLASSES DISTILLERS)
ITEMIZED COST SENARY FOP MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.9 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
EVAPOPATCR
81., CONTROL MOUSE
8,.. PULPING STATION
PI..MULTIPLE EFFECT
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION
P...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHCSPWORLS ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGOON
N...DU*L MFRIA PRESSURE FRTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOP
£f t * L * t • *
3. CHEMICALS
CCNSTKUCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
FVC L
5. PVC
TCTAL
LINER
2229150.00
5P30.00
222910.00
2P2910.00
12080.00
2692B80.00
74970.00
441700.00
4390.00
44000.00
450.00
565510.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
i. VEARLY OPERATING COST 5655io.oo
2, YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST rtECCVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL 807580,00
107720.
134350.
00
00
1125
-------
ro
Z-tfU.t
8
2fle7.S
t.
8
w
CL.
<
u
«C.Cfl *1.CO
FIGURE 319
INVESTMEISTT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 24-IX
ioo.cc
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 25-A-II - This alternative provides daily truck hauling
of all plant process wastes to municipal treatment facilities or
approved land disposal sites. A holding tank is provided.
The resulting BOD waste load is zero, and the suspended solids load is
zero.
Costs: Total investment cost: $12,860
Total yearly cost: $16,470
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 321. It is assumed
that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is further
assumed that no operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
Alternative A 25-A-III - This alternative provides for spray irrigation
of the final effluent. A holding tank, pump, and pipelines are provided.
The resulting BOD waste load is zero, and the suspended solids load is
zero.
Costs: Total investment cost: $38,270
Total yearly cost: $ 5,210
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 322. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that no operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
Model plant B has a flow of 40 cu m (0.01 MG) per day.
Alternative A 25-B-I - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 25-B-II - This alternative provides daily truck hauling
for all plant process wastes to municipal treatment facilities or
approved land disposal sites. A holding tank is provided.
The resulting BOD waste load is zero, and the suspended solids load is
zero.
Costs: Total investment cost: $ 14,670
Total yearly cost: $153,470
1127
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 321
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 25-A-II
(BOTTLING AND BLENDING OF BEVERAGE ALCOHOL)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULE8»
Y...HOLDING TANK
V... TRICK HAILING
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
L*ND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
a.
TOTAL YEARLY
CGSTS:
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTFNANCE&SUPPLIES
TCTAL
CCSTSJ
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
6490.00
2670.00
650.00
650.00
12660,00
0.0
0.0
0.0
isaso.oo
isaso.oo
15450.00
510.00
510.00
16470.00
1128
-------
TABLE 322
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 25-A-IH
(BOTTLING AND BLENDING OF BEVERAGE ALCOHOL)
ITEMIZED COST SWAflY FOP
DESIGN EFFICIENCY. ..100.0
MSTEMTFtf TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT qQD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES}
V... HOLDING
U... SPRAY
TANK
CCNSTPUCTICKi
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3. ENGINEERING
«. CCN1INGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY CPbRATII^G CCSTSs
1. LABOR
2. PCfcFR
3. CHEMICALS
u. M*INTENANCERSUPPLIES
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSt
1. YEARLY CPERJTIKG CCST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST RECCVEfrY
3. DEPRECIATION'
2<»3SO,00
3000.00
2940,00
38270.00
0.0
ftao.00
0.0
ioeo.oo
1920.00
1920.00
1530.00
1760.00
5210.00
1129
-------
,,RAFT
Vi itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 323. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that no operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
Alternative A 25-B-III - This alternative provides truck hauling on
a monthly basis for redistillation residue, bad product, and deminer-
alizer regeneration. It is assumed these wastes are collected in
holding tanks. All other process wastes are spray irrigated. A
holding tank, pump, and pipeline are provided.
The resulting BOD waste load is zero, and the suspended solids load
is zero.
Costs: Total investment cost: $48,860
Total yearly cost: $ 6,360
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 324. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that no operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies for
Subcategory A 26 - Soft Drink Canners
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 26 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, seven alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide
for various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which
produces 309 cu m (81,500 gal) per day.
Alternative A 26-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a
309 cu m (81,500 gal) per day plant is 229 cu m (0.0605 MG) per day.
The BOD waste load is 1.02 kg/cu m (0.505 lb/1000 gal), and the
suspended solids load is 0.123 kg/cu m (1.03 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 26-11 - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, nutrient addition, a complete mix activated sludge
system, sludge thickening, and spray irrigation of sludge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.052 kg/cu m (0.43 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.030 kg/cu m (0.25 lb/1000 gal).
1130
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 323
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 25-B-II
(BOTTLING AND BLENDING OF BEVERAGE ALCOHOL)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
Y...HOLDING TANK
V... TRUCK HAILING
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1, CONSTRICTION 9940.00
2. LAND 2750.00
3. ENGIKiEEPING 990.00
4. CONTINGENCY 990.00
TOTAL 14670.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR 0.0
2. POWER 0.0
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
fl. MAINTENANCFRSLPPLIES 152280.00
TOTAL 152280.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS*
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 152280.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 590.00
3. DFPRECIATION 600.00
TOTAL 153470.00
1131
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 324
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 25-B-III
(BOTTLING AND BLENDING OF BEVERAGE ALCOHOL)
ITfMlZED COST SlfVAPY FO? fcASTE'*ATER TREAT*£KT CHAl*
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMFNT MOuULESj
Y...HOLDING TA*;K
U...SPHAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTS*
I. CCN3T^UCTIO^ 37110.00
2. L4ND U330.00
3. ENGIMEEHIMR 37io.oo
y. CTNTINC-ffNTY 3710.00
TCT4L 48860.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCfTS:
1. LA 60ft 0.0
2. PC I* EH 880.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
0. f'AI.-JTFK;AMCr:*iSL.PPL.II£S 1300,00
TCTil. 21PO.OO
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YtARLY CPERAT1NG COST 2180.00
2. YFiKLY INVESTMENT
COST HECTVFRY 1950.00
3. DEPSECIATION 2230.00
TCTAL 6360.00
1132
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $238,880
Total yearly cost: $ 49,390
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 325. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.9 percent
SS: 76.0 percent
Alternative A 26-III - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 26-11 dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.026 kg/cu m (0.22 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.015 kg/cu m (0.13 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $258,070
Total yearly cost: $ 55,010
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 326. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.5 percent
SS: 88.1 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 320.
Alternative A 26-IV - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, nutrient addition, a complete mix activated sludge system,
and sludge thickening.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.052 kg/cu m (0.43 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.030 kg/cu m (0.25 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $210,270
Total yearly cost: $ 47,070
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 327. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed ,that one operator is required.
Redaction Benefits: BOD: 94.9 percent
SS: 76.0 percent
Alternative A 26-V - This alternative provides,™ addition to alter-
native A 26-IV dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.026 kg/cu m (0.22 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.015 kg/cu m (0.13 lb/1000 gal).
1133
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 325
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE
(SOFT DRINK CANNERS)
A 26-11
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA3TCMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95,0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
Bl..CONTROL HCL'SE
§...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...SLUDGE THICKENER
Y...HULDING TANK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLV OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LAPPR
2. PCIA-ER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TOTAL
165180.00
16660.00
16520.00
16520.00
238880.00
12490.00
9940.00
890.00
5400.00
26720.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY CPERATIKG CCST 28720.00
2. YEARLY INVEST^EK;T
COST RECOVERY 9560.00
3. DEPRECIATION 11110.00
TOTAL 49390.00
1134
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 326
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE
(SOFT DRINK CANNERS)
A 26-111
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5
toASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT BOP REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
Bl..CONTROL HCUSE
B...PULPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROCFN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLUDGE THICKENER
Y...HOLDING TANK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
B..,PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTPA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
1. LABOR
2. POfcER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCEISUPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
i. VEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
201170.00
16660.00
20120.00
20120.00
258070.00
12490.00
12850.00
890.00
6390.00
32620.00
32620.nO
10320.00
12C70.00
55010.00
1135
-------
co
en
o:
<
IL
O
217.C
l«*.C
-------
JRAFT
TABLE 327
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 26-IV
(SOFT DRINK CANNERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDR MASTffcAYER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MGOULESt
Bl..CONTROL HCU8E
8...PUMPING STATION
C..,EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITHOGEN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
C...8LIOGE THICKENER
Y...HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCST85
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
COSTS*
LABOR
2, POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTEMNCE4SIPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CGSTSl
1. YEARLY OPEPATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CPST RECt-VERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
153010.00
26660.00
15300.00
15300.00
210270.00
12U90.
9100.
890.
7000.
29480,
00
00
00
00
00
29«80eOO
8410.00
9180.00
47070.00
1137
-------
JRAFT
Costs: Total Investment cost: $227,790
Total yearly cost: $ 52,630
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 328.* It is
assumed that land cost $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.5 percent
SS: 88.1 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 321.
Alternative A 26-VI - This alternative provides flow equalization,
nutrient addition, and an aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.052 kg/cu m (0.43 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.030 kg/cu m (0.25 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $204,690
Total yearly cost: $ 66,240
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 329. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare (1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.9 percent
SS: 76.0 percent
Alternative A 26-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 26-VI dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.026 kg/cu m (0.22 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.015 kg/cu m (0.13 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $223,890
Total yearly cost: $ 71,860
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 330. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.5 percent
SS: 88.1 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 322.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategory A 27 - Soft Drink Bottling or Combined
Bottling/Canning Plants
A model plant representative of Subcategory A 27 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
1138
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 328
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A 26-V
(SOFT DRINK CANNERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDR
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5
WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESt
81..CONTROL HCUSE
8...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...8LLDGF THICKENER
Y..,HOLDING TANK
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTSt
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION-
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSi
1. LABOW
2. POi«ER
3. CHEMICALS
4. KA1MTENANCERSLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSt
1. YF.ARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
169000.00
24990.00
16900.00
16900.00
227790.00
12490.00
12010.00
890.00
7990.00
33380.00
33380.00
9110.00
10UO.OO
52630.00
1139
-------
CO
LL
O
LU
<
X**
u
r?-.0 I
!
-------
^RAFT
TABLE 329
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A26-VI
(SOFT DRINK CANNERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA8TEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.., 94,3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGOON
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
1. LABOR
2. PO*FR
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
5. PVC LINFR
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
164360.00
3580,00
16440.00
16440.00
3870.00
204690.00
6250.00
35460.00
890.00
5210.00
160.00
47990.00
47990.00
8190.00
10060.00
66240.00
-------
L'RAFT
TABLE 330
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A26-VII
(SOFT DRINK CANNERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGOCN
8...PULPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
2,
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
COSTS:
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
180360.00
3580.00
18040.00
18040.00
00
3870
223890.00
6250,
38390,
890,
6190,
00
00
00
00
160.00
51880.00
51680.00
8960.00
11020.00
71860.00
1142
-------
c/v
Q.
O
8
8
iC?.J I
!««.«.
57e.o
•'.«
I
co
ID
113. J
O
.
O
, * •'
f=!.c I
FIGURE 32X
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 26, ALT. VII
-------
ORAFT
ru fives. In Section VII, seven alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which produces
136 cu m (35,900 gal) per day.
Alternative A 27-1 - This alternative assumed no treatment and no re-
duction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 136 cu m (35,900 gal) per day plant is 477 cu m (0.126 MG) per day.
The BOD waste load is 2.30 kg/cu m (19.2 lb/1000 gal), and the
suspended solids load is 0.38 kg/cu m (3.2 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative A 27-11 - This alternative provides a control house,
flow equalization, neutralization, nutrient addition, a complete mix
activated sludge system, sludge thickening, and spray irrigation of
sludge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/cu m (2.00 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.14 kg/cu m (1.17 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $289,990
Total yearly cost: $ 65,980
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 3:jl. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8300 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 89.4 percent
SS: 63.0 percent
Alternative A 27-111 - This alternative provides in addition to
Alternative A 27-11 dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.123 kg/cu m (1.03 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.07 kg/cu m (0.584 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $313,900
Total yearly cost: $ 72,700
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 332. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.7 percent
SS: 81.5 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 3J3.
Alternative A 27-IV - This alternative provides a control house, flow
equalization, neutralization, nutrient addition, a complete-mix activated
sludge system, and sludge thickening.
1144
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 331
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A27-II
(SOFT DRINK PLANTS EXCEPT A26)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR I»ASTEWAT€R TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 89,4 PERCENT 800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
EM ..CONTROL HOUSE
B...PULPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
«... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLLDGE THICKENER
Y...HOLDINr, TANK
u...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTSi
1. CONSTRUCTION
2. LAND
til CONTINGENCY
TCTAl
COSTSi
LA80P
PCXER
CHEMICALS
YEARLY OPERATING
1
2
3
a. P
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY CREATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CCST MFCCVFKY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
225690,00
19160,00
22570,00
22570.00
289990.00
18740.00
11580.00
"520.00
6000,00
"0840.00
40840.00
11600.00
135^0.00
1145
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 332
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A27-III
(SOFT DRINK PLANTS EXCEPT A26)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR M8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 94.7 PtRCENT BCD "EDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESj
Bl..CONTROL MCtSE
B...PUMPING STA
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
P...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION:
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
6...SLUDGE THICKENER
V... HOLD ING TANK
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
B...PUMPING STATION
N'...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
CCSTSl
LABOR
CHEMICALS
TOTAL
RSLPPLIES
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
2a5620.00
19160.00
24560.00
24560.00
313900.00
15830.00
4520.00
6310.00
45400.00
45400.00
12560.00
14740.00
7270.0.00
1146
-------
3t».o
-------
DRAFT
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/cu m (2.00 lb/1000 gal), and the
suspended solids load is 0.14 kg/cu m (1.17 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $264,650
Total yearly cost: $ 61,140
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 333. It is>-
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 89.4 percent
SS: 63.0 percent
Alternative A 26-V - This alternative.'orovides in addition to Alternative
A 2fi-IV dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.123 kg/cu m (1.03 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended soljds load is 0.07 kg/cu m (0.584 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $288,560
Total yearly cost: $ 67,840
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 334. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.7 percent
SS: 81.5 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 324.
Alternative^ 27-VI - This alternative provides flow equalization,
neutralization, nutrient addition, and an aerated lagoon system.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.24 kg/cu m (2.00 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.14 kg/cu m (1.17 lb/1000 gal).
•
Costs: Total investment cost: $243,870
Total yearly cost: $ 78,820
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 335. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 89.4 percent
SS: 63.0 percent
Alternative A 27-VII - This alternative provides in addition to Alter-
native A 27-VI dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.123 kg/cu m (1.03 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.07 kg/cu m (0.584 lb/1000 gal).
1148
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 333
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVES A27-IV
(SOFT DRINK PLANTS EXCEPT A26)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDR WA3TEMTEH TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 89.4 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
81
P.
C.
F.
H.
K.
C.
V.
.CONTROL HCLSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EOUAL1ZATICN BASIN
.ACID NEUTRALIZATION
.NITROGEN' ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCST5J
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTS:
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTEN4NCE8SLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECTATIDM
TOTAL
194160.00
31650
19U20
00
00
00
264650.00
18740.00
10740.00
4520.00
4900.00
38900.00
38900.00
10590.00
11650.00
61140.00
1149
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 334
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A27-V
(SOFT DRINK PLANTS EXCEPT A26)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR MSTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 94,7 PERCENT 80D REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESi
81.. CONTROL HCl'SE
8...PULPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q... SLUDGE THICKENER
Y...HOUDTNG TANK
8...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS*
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
a.
COSTS:
LABOR
PCWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
21«090.00
31650.00
21410.00
21410.00
288560.00
19740.00
1*1990.00
4520.00
5200,00
43450.00
43450.00
11540.00
12850.00
67840.00
1150
-------
2P9.0
8
u.
o
l18-6
i«7.e
o
a
6
oc.c: «i.ic fi.if ««.^c «t.:: ir.«; ««.9t «o.«
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 324
INVESTMENT MID YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 27, ALT. V
93.50
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 335
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A27-VI
(SOFT DRINK PLANTS EXCEPT A26)
ITEMIZED COST SLMMAPY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... B9.
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $267,780
Total yearly cost: $ 85,530
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 336. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 94.7 percent
SS: 81.5 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 325.
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment
Technologies for. Subcategory A 28 - Beverage Bases
A model plant representative of subcategory A 28 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives, In Section VII, thirteen alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide for
various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which produces
379 cu m (0.10 M|) of beverage bases per day,
It is estimated that the effluent from a 379 cu m (0.10 M§) per day
plant is 379 cu m (0.10 MG) per day. The BOD waste load is 0.24
kg/cu m (2.00 lb/1000 gal), and the suspended solids load is 0.05
kg/cu m (0.42 lb/1000 gal).
Alternative A 28-1 - This alternative consists of a pumping station, a
flow equalization tank, and an aerated lagoon.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.010 kg/cu m (0.084 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.003 kg/cu m (0.025 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $290,570
Total yearly cost: $114,720
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 337. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
SS: 40.0 percent
Alternative A 28-11 - This alternative consists of a pumping station,
a flow equalization tank, a complete-mix activated sludge basin, a
sludge thickner, an aerobic digestor, and a sludge holding tank
followed by land application of the digestor sludge.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.018 kg/cu m (0.084 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.003 kg/fcu m (0.025 lb/1000 gal).
1153
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 336
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A27-VII
(SOFT DRINK PLANTS EXCEPT A26)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 94.7 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES?
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
F...ACID NEUTRALIZATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGGON
B...PUMPING STATION
INVESTMENT COSTS*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
N...DUAL
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINFEPIMG
CONTINGENCY
PVC L
TOTAL
PRESSURE FILTRA>N
215810.00
4160.00
21580.00
21580.00
4650.00
267780.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5,
COSTSl
LABOR
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY CPERATIKG COST
2, YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
124QQ.
38460.
4520,
5850,
00
00
00
00
320.00
61640.00
61640.00
10710.00
13180.00
85530.00
1154
-------
Ztt.O
cn
en
I
H 253.C
211.C
in
5
z
173.C
O
O
„.,
53. c:
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 325
73
f-
«i.5e «5.eo
INVESTMENT WD YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 27, ALT. VII
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 337
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-I
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA3TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,..,95.8 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESi
8...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
L...AERATED LAGOON
INVESTMENT COSTS*
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
COSTSl
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1, YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3, DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
233430.00
4160.00
23340.00
23340.00
6300.00
290570.00
12490.00
70050.00
0.0
5970.00
270.00
88780.00
88780.00
11620.00
14320.00
114720.00
1156
-------
DRAFT
Costs: Total investment cost: $720,590
Total yearly cost: $123,020
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 338. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
SS: 40.0 percent
Alternative A 28-111 - This alternative replaces the land spreading of
digester sludge in alternative A 29-11 with vacuum filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.010 kg/cu m (0.084 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.003 kg/cu m (0.025 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $359,350
Total yearly cost: $ 99,690
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 339. It is
that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It is further
assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
SS: 40.0 percent
Alternative A 28-IV - This alternative replaces the land spreading
of digester sludge in Alternative A 29-11 with sand drying beds.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.010 kg/cu m (0.084 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.003 kg/cu m (0.025 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $545,980
Total yearly cost: $138,320
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 340. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95.8 percent
SS: 40.0 percent
Alternative A 28-V - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-1
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.005 kg/cu m (0.042 lb/1000 gal),
and the suspended solids load is 0.001 kg/cu m (0.0083 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $324,190
Total yearly cost: $124,150
1157
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 338
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-II
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.8 PERCENT 800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULE3|
81
B.
C.
K.
0.
R.
Y.
.CONTROL HCLSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC DIGESTOR
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT COSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSl
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&8UPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COST8»
1. YtARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RFCCVFRY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
306170.00
353180.00
30620.00
30620.00
720590.00
37480
27600
0
10750
00
00
.0
00
75830.00
75630.00
28P20.00
18370.00
123020.0ft
1158
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 339
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-III
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR NASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.8 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION'
TREATMENT MODULESt
PI
e.
c.
K.
G.
S.
Y.
.CONTROL HCLSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCSTSl
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTFNANCE&SUPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
crsT RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
277250.00
26660.00
27720.00
27720.00
359350.00
37480.00
21760.00
3060.00
6390.00
68690.00
68690.00
14370.00
16630.00
99690.00
1159
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 340
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-IV
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR M8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DE8IGM EFFICIENCY... 95.8 PERCENT 800 REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULES|
Bl
0.
C.
K.
0.
R.
T.
V.
.CONTROL HCLSF
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLLDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC riGESTCP
.SAND DRYING BEDS
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS*
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTFNANCE&SIPPLIE8
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
451370.00
4330.00
U5140.00
45140.00
545980.00
37480.00
27600.00
0.0
24320.00
89400.00
89400.00
21840.00
27080.00
138320.00
1160
-------
DRAFT
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 341. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1600 per acre). It is
further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 80.0 percent
Alternative A 28-VI - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-11.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.005 kg/cu m (0.042 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.001 kg/cu m (0.0083 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $754,210
Total yearly cost: $132,450
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 342. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 80.0 percent
Alternative A 28-VII - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-11I.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.005 kg/cu m (0.042 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.001 kg/cu m (0.0083 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $393,000
Total yearly cost: $109,130
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 343. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 80.0 percent
Alternative A 28-VIII - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-IV.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.005 kg/cu m (0.042 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.001 kg/cu m (0.0083 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $579,610
Total yearly cost: $147,750
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 344. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that three operators are required.
1161
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 341
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-V
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR KASTEWATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
8...PULPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
L...AERATED LA60CN
P...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSJ
1. CCNSTRUCTICN 261450.00
2. LAND 4160.00
'3. ENGINEERING 26140.00
4. CONTINGENCY 26140.00
5. PVC LINER 6300.00
TOTAL 324190.00
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR 12490.00
2. POWER 75920.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4. MAINTENANCE&SIPPLIES 6500.00
5. PVC LINER 270.00
TOTAL 95180.00
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 95180.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 12970.00
3. DEPRECIATION 16000.00
TCTAL 124150.00
1162
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 342
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-VI
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.9 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
..CONTROL HCL'SF
i...PUMPING STATION
Bl
8. .._._.-
C!!]EQLALIZATICN BASIN
K... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Q...SLLDGE THICKENER
R...AERCBIC CIGESTOR
Y...HOLDING TANiK
8...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FRTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3,
4.
CCKSTRUCTIO
LAND
ENGINEERING
CCNTINGENCV
TOTAL
334190.00
353180.
33420.
00
00
33420.00
754210.00
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
CCSTS:
LABCJR
PO^ER
CHEMICALS
MAINTFMAMCESSL'PPLIES
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY CPERATIN'G COST
2. YFARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
37480.00
33470.00
0.0
11280.00
82230.00
82230.00
30170.00
20050.00
132450.00
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 343
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-VII
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FDR M3TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.3 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESs
65
8.
C.
K.
C.
S.
Y.
8.
K.
.CONTROL
.PUMPING
HCLSE
STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TAN'K
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE
FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS:
1. LABOR
2. FOWFR
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
305280.00
26660.00
30530.00
30530.00
393000.00
37U80.00
27620,00
3060.00
6930,00
75090.00
75090.00
15720.00
18320.00
109130.00
1164
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 344
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-VIII
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEDATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.9 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES:
81..CONTROL HOUSE
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQLALIZATKN BASIN
«... ACTIVATED SLUDGE
..SLUDGE THICKENER
..AERCBIC DIGESTOR
T...SAND DRYING BEDS
Y...HOLDING TANK
B...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
a.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
FNGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLV OPERATING CCSTS:
i. LABPR
2. PCwPS
3. CHEMICALS
U, MAINTEN'ANCERSLPPLIES
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSs
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECCvr&Y
3. CEPREf.TATlCM
TOTAL
^79^00.00
U7<540.00
579610.00
37U80.00
33«70.00
0.0
24860.00
95610.00
95810.00
23180.00
28760.00
U7750.00
1165
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 97.9 percent
SS: 80.0 percent
Alternative A 28-IX - This alternative provides carbon adsorption
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-V.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0025 kg/cu m (0.021 lb/1000 gal),
and the suspended solids load is 0.005 kg/cu m (0.0042 lb/1000 gal),
Costs: Total investment cost: $406,070
Total yearly cost: $152,030
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 345. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.9 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 326.
Alternative A 28-X - This alternative provides carbon adsorption in
addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-VI.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0025 kg/cu m (0.021 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.0005 kg/cu m (0.00042 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $836,070
Total yearly cost: $160,320
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 346. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.9 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 327.
Alternative A 28-XI - This alternative provides carbon adsorption in
addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-VII.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0025 kg/cu m (0.021 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.0005 kg/cu m (0.0042 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: • $474,860
Total yearly cost: $137,000
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 347. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
1166
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 345
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-IX
(BEVERAGE. BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR KA8TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESi
B.
C.
L.
8.
N.
Z.
.PUMPING STATION
.EQIALIZATICN BASIN
.AERATED LAGOON
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE PILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTICN
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
5.
.CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
COSTSi
LABOR
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPP'LIES
PVC LINER
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
329670.00
4160.00
32970.00
32970.00
6300.00
106070.00
12490.00
791BO.OO
0,0
23750.00
270.00
115690.00
115690.00
16240.00
20100.00
152030.00
1167
-------
oo
(T
_!
>-
>
HI
.t
« S-3.3
a
<
o
111.C !
oc.cs «i.co
«7.ce «e.:o
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 326
INVESTNENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 28, ALT. I, V, IX
iec.cc
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 346
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-X
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEKATEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY,.. 99.0 PERCENT 800 REDUCTION-
TREATMENT MOOULESj
Bl
e.
c.
K.
Q.
P-.
Y.
B.
N.
z,
.CONTROL HGU8E
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AEROBIC DIGESTOR
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
.ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION'
INVESTMENT COSTS!
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS!
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TCTAL
402410.00
353160.00
40240.00
40240.00
836070.00
37480.00
36730.00
0.0
28530..00
102740.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 102740.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 33440.00
3. DEPRECIATION 24140.00
TCTAL . 160320.00
1169
-------
637. C
u.
o
8
622.*
g 551.*
H .JO-.O
O
O
C 4C«.6
53'. 2
u
>-4 »'*.«
1(3.3
«o.cc
«i.90 «z.ec
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 347
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-XI
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR HASTEkATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.0 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES;
INVESTMENT COSTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
81..CONTROL HCL5E
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
K...ACTIVATED SLUDGE
o...SLUDGE THICKENER
S...VACUUM FILTRATION
Y...HOLDING TA*K
B.f.PUMPING STATION1
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
Z...ACTIVATED CARBCN A
CCN8TRUCTICN
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING
i.
2.
3.
4.
LABOR
POWER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SL'PPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS*
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
373500.00
26660.00
37350.00
37350.00
474860.00
37480.00
30890.00
3060.00
24170.00
95600.00
95600.00
18990.00
22410.00
137000.00
1171
-------
DRAFT
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.9 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 328.
Alternative A 28-XII - This alternative provides carbon adsorption in
addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 28-VIII.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0025 kg/cu m (0.021 lb/1000 gal),
and the suspended solids load is 0.005 kg/cu m (0.0042 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $661,470
Total yearly cost: $175,630
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 348. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.3 percent
SS: 90.0 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 329.
Alternative A 28-XIII - This alternative consists of a pumping station,
a flow equalization tank, and spray irrigation of the raw waste effluent.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal), and
the suspended solids load is 0.0 kg/cu m (0.0 lb/1000 gal).
Costs: Total investment cost: $192,790
Total yearly cost: $ 27,360
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 349. It. is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that one-half time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Techno!ocn'.es for
Subcategory A 30 - Instant Tea
A model plant representative of subcategory A 30 was developed in Section
V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alternatives. In
Section VII, eight alternatives were selected as being applicable engi-
neering alternatives. These alternatives provide for various levels of
waste reductions for the model plant which produces 9.1 kkg (10 ton) of
soluble "instant" tea per day.
Alternative A 30-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no reduc-
tion in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from a 9.1
llg (10 ton) per day plant is 454 cu m (0.12 MG) per day. The 300 waste
117?
-------
VI
5
b
S
*-s
V
Iil7.il
««,C
^ » • „ . ^ • » V - ' C * V V T « t v V ^ t » ^ J
EFFICIENCY
FIGURE 328
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 28, ALT. Ill, VI, XI
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 348
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-XII
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR I*ASTE*ATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 99.0 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
Bi..CONTROL HCLSE
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
*... ACTIVATED SLLDGE
Q...SLLDGE THICKENER
R...AERC5IC DIGESTQR
T...SANP DRYING-PEDS
Y...HOLDING TANK
P...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FIURA'N
z...ACTIVATED CAPBCN ACSCRPTK^
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1. CCNSTRUCTICN 547620.00
2. LAND 4330.00
3. ENGINEERING 54760.00
4. CONTINGENCY 54760.00
TCTAL 661470.00
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSt
1. LABO» 37480.00
2, POWER 36730.00
3. CHEMICALS 0.0
4. MAINTEKANCE&SLPPHES 42100.00
TCTAL 116310.00
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 116310.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
CC.8T RECOVERY 26^60.00
3. DEPRECIATION 32860.00
TCTAL 175630.00
1174
-------
8
u.
o
55*.
Ul
z
t-t
I-
a
<
u
:«?.
13?.C
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 349
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A28-XIII
(BEVERAGE BASE SYRUP)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR M8TFMTER TREATMENT CHAIN'
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULESt
Y...HOLDING TANK
U... SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
CCNSTRUCTICN
LAND
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2,
3.
4.
CCSTSt
LABOR
CHEMICALS
PAINTENAMCEHSLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COST?:
1. YEARLY CFFPATIKG CCST
2. YEARLY INV
CCST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
13289C.OO
33320.OP
132
-------
DRAFT
loaTTs" 1>0.0 kg/kkg (100.0 Ib/ton), and the suspended solids load is
37.5 kg/kkg (75.0 Ib/ton).
Alternatlve A 30-11 - This alternative consists of a pumping station,
a flow equalization tank, primary clarification, a complete-mix activated
sludge basin, sludge thickening, aerobic digestion and vacuum filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 2.00 kg/kkg (4.0 Ib/ton), and the sus-
pended solids load is 5.50 kg/kkg (11.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $358,430
Total yearly cost: $ 97,010
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 350. It is
that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It is further
assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 96.0 percent
SS: 85.3 percent
Alternative A 30-111 - This alternative replaces the vacuum filtration
module of alternative A 30-11 with sand drying beds.
The resulting BOD waste load is 2.00 kg/kkg (4.00 Ib/ton) and the suspen-
ded solids load is 5.5 kg/kkg (11.0 Ib/ton).
Cost: Total investment cost: $402,290
Total yearly cost: $103,830
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 351. It is
that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8,330 per acre). It is further
assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 96.0 percent
SS: 85.3 percent
Alternative A 30-IV - This alternative consists of a pumping station,
a flow equalization tank and aerated lagoon.
The resulting BOD waste load is 2.0 kg/kkg (4.0 Ib/ton) and the suspended
solids load is 5.5 kg/kkg (11.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $359,080
Total yearly cost: $140,200
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 352. It is
that land costs $4,100 per hectare ($1,660 per acre). It is further
assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 96.0 percent
SS: 85.3 percent
1177
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 350
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A30-II
(INSTANT TEA)
ITEMIZED COST 8LMKARY FOR WASTEfcATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl
B.
C.
E.
K.
S.
Y,
.CONTROL HOUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.CLARIFIER
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE TMICKENEP
.AEROBIC DICES TOR
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT CCSTSt
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
FNPINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
a.
COSTSi
LABOR
PO'^EP
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSJ
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
273700.00
29990.00
27370.00
27370.00
358U30.00
37480.00
18990.00
2670.00
7110.00
66250.00
66250,00
i.OO
16420.00
97010.00
1178
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 351
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A30-III
(INSTANT TEA)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOP WA9TFMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl
8.
C.
E.
K.
0.
P-.
T.
Y.
.CONTROL HCL'SE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.CLARIFIED
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLtOGg THICKENER
.AER08IC OIGESTOR
.SANp DRYING BEDS
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT COSTSI
i.
2.
3.
4.
CCNSTPUCTIC^
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTS*
LABOR
PCWEP
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
TCTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSi
1. VEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST PFCCVFRY
3. DEPRECIATION
TCTAL
318580.00
l
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 352
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A30-IV
(INSTANT TEA)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTEP TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULFSt
B...PUMPING STATION
C...EQUALIZATION BASIN
L...AERATED LAGOON
INVESTMENT CCSTSI
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINEP
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTS;
1. LABOR
2D t^ IAJ IT U
0 r Vi I" t ™
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SIPPLIES
5. PVC LINER
TOTAL
288570.00
4660.00
PP860.00
28660.00
8130.00
359080.00
12490.00
87UO.OO
0.0
8180.00
310.00
108120.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 108120.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 14360.00
3. DEPRECIATION 17720.00
TOTAL 140200,00
1180
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 30-V - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 30-11.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.0 kg/kkg (2.0 Ib/ton), and the
suspneded solids load is 1.0 kg/kkg (2.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $382,030
Total yearly cost: $103,680
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 353. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that one operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.0 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 330.
Alternative A 30-VI - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 30-1II.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.0 kg/kkg (2.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $463,070
Total yearly cost: $120.500
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 354. It is
assumed that land costs $20,510 per hectare ($8330 per acre). It
is further assumed that three operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.0 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 331.
Alternative A 30-VII - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 30-IV.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.0 kg/kkg (2.0 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 1.0 kg/kkg (2.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $424,650
Total yearly cost: $148,560
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 355. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 98.0 percent
SS: 97.3 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 332.
1181
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 353
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A30 -V
(INSTANT TEA)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FQR WA3TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl
8.
C.
E.
K.
0.
R.
S.
Y.
8.
N.
.CONTROL HCUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.EQUALIZATION BASIN
.CLARIFIER
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AERCRIC DIGESTQR
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FJLTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSi
1.
2.
I.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTS*
i. LABOR
a. PC*ER
3. CHEMICALS
«. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS*
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
293360.00
29990.00
29340.00
29340.00
382030.00
37480.00
23240.00
2670.00
7410.00
70800.00
70800.00
15280,00
17600.00
103680.00
1182
-------
sai.o
CO
o:
J2S.I
2t«.»
In
8
a«c.o
211.«
H«.2
129.*
Q.
3
«i.ce <2.eo <>. ee
**'°° *7*ee
FIGURE 330
INVEST^€^T^ AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 30. ALT. n, v
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 354
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A30-VI
(INSTANT TEA)
ITEMIZED COST BLEARY PHR UA9TEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 97.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
81
8.
C.
E.
K.
G.
R.
T.
V.
B.
N.
.CONTROL HCU3E
.PUMPING STATION
.FQLALI7ATION PASIN
.CLARIFIER
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.SLUDGE THICKENER
.AFPCPIC DIRESTCR
.SAND DRYING BEDS
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTS*
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSf
1. LABOR
2, PC'WER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAJNTf-NANCERSUPPLIES
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
i. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
338240.00
19990.00
33820.00
33820.00
425870.00
37480.00
20880.00
0.0
14820.00
73180.00
73180.00
17030.00
20290.00
110500.00
1184
-------
(fl
o:
u.
o
8
>-
^^
>-
u
.8
'.*•?.<
. 3
u ic3.e i
:eo>cs
FIGURE 331
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 30, ALT. 30 III. VI
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 355
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A30-VII
(INSTANT TEA)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.,. 97.5 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
8...PUMPING STATION
C...EOUALIZATICN BASIN '
L...AERATED LAGOON
R...PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA»N
INVESTMENT COSTSI
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSl
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4, MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
5. PVC
TOTAL
LINER
306230.00
46650.00
30620.00
30620.00
6130.00
424650.00
12490.00
91390,00
0.0
8460.00
310.00
112670.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTSI
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 112670.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 16990.00
3. DEPRECIATION 18900.00
TOTAL 148560.00
1186
-------
00
to
i
co
o
I
o
o
• 13.0
I«*. 5
J»«.0
JJ9.5
3U.O
•-« asj.s
^ 2la.e
22S.S
tta.s
lao.o
90.00 41.00 42.00 41.00 4a^QO 4S.09 «».00 47.00 48.00 4V.00 100.00
FIGURE 332
INVESTMEm- AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGORY A 30. ALT. A 30 IV
-------
DRAFT
Alternative A 3Q-VIII - This alternative provides dual media filtration
in addition to the treatment modules of Alternative A 30-IV.
The resulting BOD waste load is 1.0 kg/kkg (2.0 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $223,650
Total yearly cost: $ 30,250
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 356. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It
is further assumed that one half-time operator is required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 100 percent
SS: 100 percent
Cost and Reduction Benefits of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for Subcategory C 8 - Coffee Roasting with Wet Scrubbers
A model plant representative of Subcategory C 8 was developed in
Section V for the purpose of applying control and treatment alter-
natives. In Section VII, four alternatives were selected as being
applicable engineering alternatives. These alternatives provide
for various levels of waste reductions for the model plant which
consumes 60 kkg (65 ton) of coffee beans per day.
f
Alternative C 8-1 - This alternative assumes no treatment and no
reduction in the waste load. It is estimated that the effluent from
a 60 kkg (65 ton) per day plant is 64.3 cu m/day (0.017 MGD). The
BOD concentration is 350 mg/1, and the suspended solids concentration
is 200 mg/1.
Costs: 0
Reduction Benefits: None
Alternative C 8-II - This alternative consists of a pumping station,
caustic neutralization, a primary clarifier, an activated sludge
system, sludge thickening, vacuum filtration, and sludge storage and
hauling. A control house is provided.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.038 kg/kkg (0.076 Ib/ton), and
the suspended solids load is 0.066 kg/kkg (0.13 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $181,710
Total yearly cost: $ 78,600
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 357. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 90 percent
SS: 70 percent
1188
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 356
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE A30-VIII
(INSTANT TEA)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WA8TEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...100.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES}
Y...HOLDING
U...SPRAY IRRIGATION
INVESTMENT COSTSf
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4, CONTINGENCY
TCTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTS;
LABOR
POER
CHEMICALS
MAINTENANCE&SLPPLIES
TCTAL
TCTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2, YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECCVFRY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
15C420.00
^3150,00
150^0.00
15040.00
223650.00
6250.00
1840.00
0.0
4190.00
12280.00
12280.00
8950.00
9020.00
30250.00
1189
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 357
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE C8-II
(COFFEE ROASTING WITH WET SCRUBBERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY.,.90.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl
B.
G.
E.
H.
I.
K.
S.
Y.
.CONTROL HOUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.CAUSTIC NEUTRALIZATION
.CLARIFIER
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
INVESTMENT COSTSl
1.
2.
3.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
4. CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSl
1. LABOR
2. PCWER
3. CHEMICALS
«• MAINTENANCE&SUPPLIES
TOTAL
129210.00
26660.00
12920.00
12920.00
181710.00
24990.00
5200,00
16860.00
16510.00
63580.00
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS:
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST 63580.00
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY 7270,00
3. DEPRECIATION 7750.00
TOTAL 78600.00
1190
-------
DRAFT
Alternative C 8-III - This alternative consists of Alternative C 8-II
with the addition of dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.019 kg/kkg (0.038 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.018 kg/kkg (0.035 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $207,430
Total yearly cost: $ 85,260
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 358. It is
assumed that land costs $41,000 per hectare ($16,600 per acre). It
is further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95 percent
SS: 92 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 333.
Alternative C 8-IV - This alternative consists of a pumping station,
caustic neutralization, nutrient addition, and aerated lagoons.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.038 kg/kkg (0.076 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.11 kg/kkg (0.22 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $218,760
Total yearly cost: $ 67,090
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 359. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 90 percent
SS: 50 percent
Alternative C 8-V - This alternative consists of Alternative C 8-1V
with the addition of dual media filtration.
The resulting BOD waste load is 0.019 kg/kkg (0.038 Ib/ton), and the
suspended solids load is 0.031 kg/kkg (0.062 Ib/ton).
Costs: Total investment cost: $244,470
Total yearly cost: $ 73,750
An itemized breakdown of costs is presented in Table 360. It is
assumed that land costs $4100 per hectare ($1660 per acre). It is
further assumed that two operators are required.
Reduction Benefits: BOD: 95 percent
SS: 86 percent
A cost efficiency curve is presented in Figure 334.
1191
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 358
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE C8-III
(COFFEE ROASTING WITH WET SCRUBBERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY...95.0 PERCENT BOD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES*
Bl
B.
6.
E.
H,
I.
K.
S.
Y.
8.
N.
.CONTROL HOUSE
.PUMPING STATION
.CAUSTIC NEUTRALIZATION
.CLARIPIER
.NITROGEN ADDITION
.PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
.ACTIVATED SLUDGE
.VACUUM FILTRATION
.HOLDING TANK
.PUMPING STATION
.DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING COSTSi
1. LABOR
2. POWER
3. CHEMICALS
4. MAINTENANCE&SUPPLltS
TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY CCSTSl
1. YEARLY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
150650.00
26660.00
15060.00
15060.00
207430.00
24990.00
7530.00
16660.00
18520.00
67920.00
67920.00
8300.00
9040,00
85260.00
1192
-------
10
o
b
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 359
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE C8-IV
(COFFEE ROASTING WITH WET SCRUBBERS)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEMTER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 90.0 PERCENT BCD REDUCTION
TREATMENT MODULES!
Bl..CONTROL
B...PUMPING
HOUSE
STATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHCSPHORUS ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGCCN
INVESTMENT CCSTSl
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC
TOTAL
YEARLY
OPERATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
COSTSl
LABOR
CHEMICALS
MAINTPNAK'CERSLPPLIES
PVC LINER
TOTAL
TOTAL VEARLY COSTSt
i. YFAPUY OPERATING COST
2. YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST RECOVERY
3. DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
154980.00
26320.00
15500.00
15500.00
4460.00
218760.00
24990.00
2210.00
15140.00
6210.00
270.00
48820.00
48820.00
8750.00
9520.00
67090.00
-------
DRAFT
TABLE 360
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE C8-V
(EGG PROCESSING)
ITEMIZED COST SUMMARY FOR WASTEKATER TREATMENT CHAIN
DESIGN EFFICIENCY... 95.0 PERCENT BOO REDUCTION
TREATMENT MCDULESi
Bl..CONTROL HOUSE
B...PUMPING STATION
H...NITROGEN ADDITION
I...PHOSPHORUS ADDITION
L...AERATED LAGOON
B,.'.PUMPING STATION
N...DUAL MEDIA PRESSURE FILTRA'N
INVESTMENT COSTSt
1.
2.
3.
4.
5;
CONSTRUCTION
LAND
ENGINEERING
CONTINGENCY
PVC LINER
TOTAL
YEARLY OPERATING CCSTSl
!• LABOR
2D POWER
30 CHEMICALS
40 MAJNTENANCE&SUPPIIES
5Q PVC LINER
, TOTAL
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS!
1, YEARLY OPERATING COST
2, YEARLY INVESTMENT
COST .RECOVERY
3, DEPRECIATION
TOTAL
176410.00
28320.00
176*10.00
17640.00
4460.00
244470.00
24990.00
4540.00
15140.00
6220,00
270.00
53160.00
53160.00
9780.00
10610.00
73750.00
1195
-------
VO
tn
9E
in
2
•<
o
10.*
tat.i
c
ITI.I
IM.I
III.*
»?.» IT
M.e» ft.ee
«».»• *
EFFICIENCY
«T.ee te.ee ««.ee iee.ee
FIGURE 334
INVESTMENT AND YEARLY COSTS FOR SUBCATEGQRY Ce, AUT» V
------- |