United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5102W)
EPA 542-R-94-001
January 1994
&EPA Summary Proceedings
Northeast Marketplace
Business Opportunities for
Innovative Technologies
December 7-8,1993
Hartford, Connecticut
Recycled/Recyclable
Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper thai
contains at least 50% recycled liber
-------
-------
Acknowledgements
This conference was conducted under the direction of Ms. Linda Fiedler,
work assignment manager for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Technology Innovation Office. Mr. Thomas R. De Kay, Ph.D. was the Project
Officer.
Special acknowledgement is due the Regional and state staff who assisted
with the conference and whose names appear on the List of Speakers.
They provided the detailed information in this document. Their cooperation
and willingness to share their knowledge and expertise on marketing and
business opportunities for innovative treatment technologies encourages the
development and application of those technologies.
11
-------
Notice
The abstracts contained in this Proceedings do not necessarily reflect the
views of the Agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred.
Mention of firms, trade names, or commercial products in this document
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
This material has been funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
under Contract Number 68-W2-0004.
in
-------
Abstract
On December 7-8, 1993, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Technology Innovation Office and Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
co-sponsored a regional conference in Hartford, Connecticut with the States
of Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York to provide an
opportunity for developers and vendors of innovative treatment technologies
to explore business opportunities and markets. The information presented
includes specific data on the number and types of contaminated sites in
each state and nationwide, international markets, pertinent state regulations
and contacts, and sources of technology development and commercializa-
tion funding and guidance. The conference attendees included vendors of
innovative treatment technologies, entrepreneurs, private clean-up
contractors, as well as federal and state officials responsible for remediation.
IV
-------
Table of Contents
Page
Agenda 1
Keynote Address
Elliott P. Laws, Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 5
What Connecticut is Doing to Encourage Innovation
Timothy R.E. Keeney, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection 11
What is NJDEPE Doing to Encourage Innovative Treatment Technologies in Site
Remediation?
Barry Frasco, Ph.D., Assistant Director for Hazardous Site Science, New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy 12
What Massachusetts is Doing to Encourage Innovation
Dean S. Spencer, Esquire, Senior Deputy General Counsel, Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Protection 13
Defining the Market for Innovative Remediation Technologies: Domestic Markets
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D., Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator
for Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency 17
Defining the Market for Innovative Remediation Technologies: International Markets
Jonathan C. Menes, Acting Assistant Secretary for Trade Development,
U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration 31
States' Market Perspectives: New York
James Harrington, Chief, Technology Section, New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation 32
States' Market Perspectives: Connecticut's Aggressive Economic Development Programs
Robert W. Santy, Deputy Commissioner, Connecticut Department of
Economic Development 33
States' Market Perspectives: Massachusetts
Anna G. Symington, Environmental Analyst, Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection 34
-------
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: New York
James Harrington, Chief Technology Section, New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation 37
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: New York State
Center for Hazardous Waste Management
Ralph R. Rumer, Sc.D., Executive Director, New York State Center for
Hazardous Waste Management 38
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: New York State
Science and Technology Foundation
Jack Van Wie, Operations Analyst, New York State Science and
Technology Foundation 39
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: NJDEPE Innovative
Treatment Technologies in Site Remediation
Barry Frasco, Ph.D., Assistant Director, New Jersey Department
of Environmental Protection and Energy 40
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: The Center for Environmental
Engineering and Science Role as a Support to Innovation
Peter B. Lederman, Ph.D., Director, Hazardous Substance Management
Research Center, New Jersey Institute of Technology 41
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: Connecticut
Domenic Grasso, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Environmental Research
Institute, University of Connecticut 43
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: U.S. SB A
Jo-Ann Van Vechten, Acting District Director, Hartford District,
U.S. Small Business Administration 51
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: Massachusetts
Anna Symington, Environmental Analyst, Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection 57
Selection of Innovative Technologies: A Large Company Perspective
Mark Sneeringer, Ph.D., Manager, Remediation Vendor Development,
GE Corporate Research and Development . 61
VI
-------
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
How Does a Technology Get Selected? A Vendor's Perspective
Eugene Herman, J.D., Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Molten
Metal Technologies, Inc 67
Commercialization of Environmental Technology
Edgar Berkey, President, National Environmental Technology
Applications Center 81
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements
Larry Fradkin, Director, Federal Technology Transfer Act Program,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 83
SBA Loan Program
Gary W. Besser, Chief of Finance Division, Hartford District,
U.S. Small Business Administration 91
Barriers and Solutions to Commercializing Remediation Technologies for
Economic Profit
Dag M. Syrrist, Vice President, Technology Funding, Inc 93
List of Speakers 103
List of Attendees 105
VII
-------
Agenda
December?, 1993
Welcoming Remarks Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. EPA
Plenary Session: Perspectives on New Technology Opportunities
Elliott P. Laws
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U. S. EPA
Break and Exhibits
Session 1: What States are Doing to Encourage Innovation
Moderator: Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D., Acting Deputy Attittant Mminittntor for Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. EPA
Timothy Keeney
Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
Barry Frasco, Ph.D.
Assistant Director for Hazardous Site Science, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
Dean S. Spencer, Esq.
Senior Deputy General Counsel, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Lunch
Session 2: Defining the Market for Innovative Remediation Technologies
Moderator: Margaret M. Kelly, Acting Director, Techology Innovation Office, U.S. EPA
Domestic Markets Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U. S. EPA
International Markets Jonathan C. Menes
Acting Assistant Secretary for Trade Development, U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
States' Market Perspectives
New York James Harrington
Chief, Technology Section, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Connecticut Robert W. Santy
Deputy Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Economic Development
Massachusetts Anna Symington
Environmental Analyst, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Break and Exhibits
Session 3: Sources of Market Information and Other Resources
Moderator: Linda Fiedler, Technology Innovation Office, U.S. EPA
New York James Harrington
Chief, Technology Section, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Ralph Rumer, Sc.D.
Executive Director, New York State Center for Hazardous Waste Management
Jack Van Wle
Operations Analyst, New York State Science and Technology Foundation
-------
Agenda (continued)
December?, 1993
Session 3: Sources of Market Information and Other Resources (continued)
Moderator: Linda Fiedler, Technology Innovation Office, U.S. EPA
New Jersey Barry Frasco, Ph.D.
Assistant Director for Hazardous Site Science, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
Peter Lederman, Ph.D.
Director, HSMRC, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Connecticut Domenic Grasso, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, University of Connecticut, Environmental Research Institute
Jo-Ann Van Vechten
Acting District Director, Hartford District Office, U.S. Small Business Administration
Massachusetts Anna Symington
Environmental Analyst, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Reception and Exhibits
Decembers, 1993
Session 4: How Does a Technology Get Selected?
Moderator. James Harrington, Chief, Technology Section, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
A Client's Perspective Mark Sneerlnger, Ph.D.
Manager, Remediation Vendor Development, General Electric, Corporate Research and Development
A Vendor's Perspective Eugene Berman, J.D.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Molten Metal Technology, Inc.
Break and Exhibits
Session 5: How Does a Firm Obtain Business Funding and Support?
Moderator: Domenic Grasso, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Connecticut, Enviornmental Research Innstitute
Commercialization of Environmental Technology Edgar Berkey
President, National Environmental Technology Applications Center (NETAC)
Opportunities for Joint U.S. EPA/Industry Partnerships Larry Fradkin
Director, Federal Technology Transfer Act, U.S. EPA, Office of Research & Development
Small Business Loans for Innovative Companies Gary W. Besser
Chief of Finance Division, Hartford District Office, U.S. Small Business Administration
Attracting Financial Backing Dag Syrrlst
Vice President, Technology Funding, Inc.
Closing Remarks Margaret M. Kelly
Acting Director, Technology Innovation Office, U. S. EPA
-------
Plenary Session:
Perspectives on New
Technology
Opportunities
-------
Keynote Address
Elliott P. Laws
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
I am happy to be here to speak to you today. I was sworn in as the new Assistant Administrator
for the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response in October, and assumed the job with the
conviction that a successful future for our cleanup programs will be heavily dependent upon the
development and use of innovative regulatory and technological approaches. I believe that our
commitment to clean up contaminated sites must be combined with an aggressive search for
technologies that are more cost-effective; help us reach an endpoint faster; are acceptable to the
public; and provide answers where today there are no clear technical solutions. Moreover, this
Administration has made clear its belief that the goal of more cost-effective, improved environmental
protection can only strengthen U.S. businesses as they expand into global environmental markets.
The U.S. environmental technology and service sector and EPA are truly allies in our effort to improve
public health and environmental quality.
The Environmental Protection Agency has historically fulfilled well-defined roles including
those of regulation writer, permit issuer, and enforcement agent. Those functions will certainly
continue, but the Agency is now aware that those functions alone do not create a climate that
encourages commercialization of innovative technologies. In fact, in designing our regulatory
programs, EPA has inadvertently created barriers to innovation. For example, before technology
vendors can test the performance of their equipment or process on soil contaminated with RCRA
hazardous waste, they must obtain a Research and Development permit. Before obtaining the permit,
however, you must have some performance data. But you need the permit to develop the data. The
results of a system such as this are obvious. And if you're a small business, you may have trouble
staying financially solvent awaiting permit approval.
The Agency can now point to changes that are being made to the regulatory program, and to
institutional changes that are encouraging innovators to develop new technologies to help solve
environmental problems more efficiently and at lower cost. An additional benefit of encouraging
innovation at U.S. firms, of course, is the opportunity to support already strong U.S. environmental
products and services in the global market. Therefore, I view EPA as playing a uniquely valuable role
in the commercialization of innovative technologies:
EPA has the unique opportunity to break down regulatory barriers and create incentives for
innovation to prevent and reduce pollution and solve contamination problems
EPA has access to information on markets that can guide technology developers and
researchers to the most serious environmental problems in the U.S.
EPA laboratories are providing third party evaluations of the performance and cost of
innovative technologies to enhance credibility of vendor claims
EPA can act as a broker between technology vendors and technology clients, providing
tools to facilitate the screening and matching of environmental problems with technological
solutions.
-------
This morning I would like to briefly discuss some of the important changes that have been
made or are underway at EPA that we hope will speed up and reduce the cost with which innovative
environmental technologies are introduced and accepted in the marketplace.
One of the federal initiatives that I am most excited about was launched by President Clinton in
his State of the Union address in February. The Environmental Technology Initiative (ETI) will provide
much needed stimuli to the technology development community to translate nearly commercial
technologies into fully realized processes and equipment that will successfully compete in the global
marketplace. The Innovative Technology Council (ITC), an EPA group composed of representatives
from all EPA programs, has developed critical elements of a strategy to formulate EPA's role in
encouraging innovation and leading the ETI. I am proud to say that Walt Kovalick has a leading role
in the direction and implementation of the ETI. Under that program:
EPA will directly fund development and commercialization of innovative technologies.
Although most innovation occurs in the private sector, there are long term environmental goals
that may require government intervention to cause technology development. In particular, small
businesses have their eye on those immediate jobs, and may not have a strategic approach to
technology development for some of our more important environmental goals. The Agency can
identify those areas where innovation is most needed, and work with the private sector to develop
the necessary technology.
Second, EPA will intervene, through its capacity as an objective evaluator of technologies, to
overcome non-regulatory barriers in the marketplace.
Lack of credible, full-scale, field-tested performance and cost data is a serious barrier to the
acceptance of new technologies. Federal and state regulators, and potential technology customers
and investors require such proof prior to financial commitments. The form of the intervention may be
testing and evaluation services, or provision of federal facilities for field trials. The strategy callc for
the establishment of a "reinvention" laboratory to pilot an envirotech verification program to validate
vendor performance claims. EPA will be looking to federal partners such as the Departments of
Energy and Defense for possible locations at federal facilities.
Third, EPA will assist the diffusion of innovative technologies once they have crossed the
threshold of a first commercial application.
As we develop a better understanding of the critical pathways that influence domestic and
international diffusion, we will be able to more effectively assist technology developers in obtaining
jobs in domestic and international markets. These pathways may include information clearinghouses;
early-involvement partnerships with private companies, states and other federal agencies for
development, testing and evaluation; and, modified federal procurement practices that favor
innovative technologies. In short, we hope to position the Agency to be a partner with the private
sector in marketing emerging environmental technologies around the world. This is part of a new
realization that environmental interests are not on a collision course with economic interests, but will
play a critical supporting role in the revitalization of this nation's economy.
Lastly, EPA and states are in a unique position to create a regulatory system that provides
incentives, rather than barriers, to new technologies.
The current situation, as I mentioned earlier, is that regulations were not written to encourage
innovation, and in fact, frequently inhibit introduction of new technologies. We need to proceed»
further with regulations that:
-------
Offer greater technological flexibility
Are more predictable and consistent
Streamline and speed permit processes
Encourage pollution prevention rather than the need for control technology
Reduce the "double jeopardy" problem by making the enforcement process more
accepting of innovative technologies
Increase the use of market-based approaches that provide a financial incentive to discover
technologies that will exceed current standards and push forward the frontier of innovation.
A parallel effort to change regulations that impede innovation is already underway. Through
these efforts, we hope to make the continuing search for innovative technologies a cornerstone of
this nation's environmental protection effort. Let me briefly discuss some of the regulatory
requirements that clearly drive the hazardous waste market for technologies. The most critical
regulations involve fundamental changes in our approach to contaminated media:
The Treatability Study Exclusion Rule has allowed technology developers to trial test their
equipment or process on about four drums of contaminated waste without obtaining a
RCRA permit. Numerous developers have informed us that this current volume limit,
although helpful, was of little use. We are now finalizing a proposal to increase the volume
limit to about half a dump truck of remediation type waste based on an overwhelmingly
positive response to the proposal.
The Phase I Land Disposal Restriction Rule for Debris was promulgated in August, 1993,
and specifies performance standards and/or technology design and operating standards
for the full-scale cleanup of debris. This rule also represents a departure from historical
approaches in that once the debris is treated through extraction and destruction
techniques (including bioremediation), it is no longer considered hazardous under the
RCRA subtitle C system. This should result in greater certainty and cost savings for
technology providers and users.
The Phase II Land Disposal Restriction Rule for Soils applies to the full-scale cleanup of
soils contaminated with RCRA hazardous waste. This rule was proposed in September of
this year, and is a departure from the incineration-based standard for Best Demonstrated
Available Technology (BOAT). It will enable the use of a wide range of technologies for
contaminated soil by providing performance specifications. The proposal identifies nine
general innovative treatment technologies including biological treatment, thermal
desorption and soil washing which appear to be able to meet proposed cleanup goals.
The comment period for this proposed rule has been extended to March 15, 1994.
The Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU) Rule applies to on-site, full-scale cleanup
of soils, debris, and ground water under RCRA Corrective Action or as a Superfund
requirement. This rule represents a flexible management approach ~ potentially allowing
treatment to less than BOAT levels within the CAMU, depending on actual site conditions
and waste characteristics that provides opportunity for greater use of innovative
technologies. There is special encouragement for the use of bioremediation.
In mid-1994, we hope to finalize a permanent exemption of underground storage tank
(UST) petroleum-contaminated media and debris from designation as RCRA hazardous
waste. Thjs rule will allow states to manage UST petroleum-contaminated soils, ground
water, and debris as nonhazardous, which will remove the Subtitle C permitting
requirements and the need for BOAT treatment.
-------
One final point I want to emphasize this morning is the compatibility between the goals of a
healthy environment and a healthy economy. EPA is currently involved in a pilot project to determine
how we can assist disadvantaged urban communities in both cleaning up contaminated sites and
returning those old industrial sites to productive use. We recently instituted a "Brownfields
Redevelopment Project" in Cleveland, Ohio, which has 133 contaminated sites, none of which
qualifies for listing on the NPL. Working with the community and the State, we hope to identify
businesses that are interested in developing and locating on the sites. The ultimate goal is to create
new jobs and economic growth, increase the tax base, property values, and get these communities
back on their feet. This sustainable development approach is a model we would like to translate to
other urban communities across the country.
I am extremely pleased to be here with officials from the States of Connecticut, New Jersey,
New York, and Massachusetts. Their commitment to innovative technologies is clear from the state
initiatives you will hear about during the next day and a half. I am also extremely pleased to be here
with colleagues from the Department of Commerce and the Small Business Administration. I think
this is clear evidence of the increased commitment that this Administration is placing on the
development and marketing of innovative technologies. I look forward to working jointly with them
and you to provide federal incentives for innovative technology development.
Let me close by saying that I have been in my position a little over a month now. But in that
time I have become even more convinced that our efforts to promote innovative technologies are
long overdue. We must, however, continue to work to convince all of the stakeholders that this effort
is not only necessary; but safe. We must work to convince communities that the use of an innovative
technology is NOT experimentation or using the citizens as guinea pigs or laboratory rats. We must
work to convince those same communities along with environmentalists and health officials that just
because innovative technologies may clean "differently" that does not mean that they clean "worse."
And we must work to convince the Congress, that it is in the long-term environmental and economic
interest of the United States to share some of the risks involved in the development of innovative
technologies. EPA will work to achieve those goals.
-------
Session 1:
What States are
Doing to Encourage
Innovation
-------
What Connecticut Is Doing to Encourage Innovation
Timothy R.E. Keeney
Commissioner
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
State governments face challenging environmental problems including providing cleaner air,
water and land resources. Protecting public health is a primary goal. These environmental challenges
help create opportunities for innovative technologies for site remediation and pollution prevention.
Connecticut's efforts to stimulate the development of environmental industries, undertake remediation
of contaminated sites and prevent pollution offer examples of what the states are doing to encourage
innovation.
Environmental Industries: The Environmental Industries initiative is a nonregulatory attempt to
capitalize on opportunities posed by new environmental and energy technologies and to stimulate the
economy as we protect the environment. The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP) has compiled a directory of over 500 enterprises within the state already involved in some form
of environmental industry; formed an Advisory Committee to help advance the initiative; and is
working with the Department of Economic Development to establish an Entrepreneurial Center. The
Center will act as a clearinghouse and network, bringing together products with markets, helping to
identify new market opportunities, and providing business development assistance.
Remediation Programs: Connecticut's Programs for remediating hazardous waste disposal
sites or addressing liability issues include the state Superfund Program (1987); Property Transfer
Program (1985); Urban Site Remedial Action Program (1993); and Innocent Landowner Law (1993).
There are approximately 1000 known hazardous waste disposal sites and some 600 suspected sites in
the state. Remedial actions are underway at 211 sites, and cleanup has been completed at an
additional 73 sites. Connecticut's site remediation needs represent a significant opportunity for
vendors of treatment technologies, entrepreneurs and private cleanup contractors who are developing
and marketing new technologies for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites. New technologies are
needed that either treat the contamination in situ, or extract the contaminants from the soil or water
for treatment and disposal. Such systems must be applied at appropriate sites, designed and
constructed properly, and operated and maintained effectively to win the approval of environmental
agencies.
Pollution Prevention: Pollution Prevention, which is the elimination or reduction of waste at the
source, has recently become a formal principle of environmental management. Prevention is more
efficient and cheaper than cleaning up at the "end of the pipe." The search for technologies and
processes that use less raw materials, less energy and less toxic materials offers opportunities for
entrepreneurs. Connecticut's Public Act 91-376 created a $10 million state loan fund to help
businesses develop pollution prevention activities.
11
-------
What is NJDEPE Doing to Encourage Innovative Treatment
Technologies in Site Remediation?
Barry Frasco, Ph.D.
Assistant Director for Hazardous Site Science
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
Innovative technology alternatives are approved and encouraged by NJDEPE.
Bioremediation, with and without vapor extraction or enhancement, is the leading
technology but other technologies are being used and tested as well.
Due to the magnitude of contaminated sites in New Jersey, there is a high potential for
increased use of innovative treatment technologies.
The NJDEPE has promulgated two new rules (Oversight Rules and Technical Requirements)
which deal with contaminated site remediation. These rules will greatly increase the number
and speed of cleanups in the State.
Innovative and alternative investigation methods, including treatability studies may be
allowed without Department pre-approval.
Treatability studies are not always required, and previously performed studies may be
referenced.
On-site permanent remedies are strongly encouraged. Reuse of contaminated material is
encouraged where possible.
Identification of innovative/alternative and emerging technologies is required when a
Remedial Alternative Analysis is performed.
Formal permitting of remediation technologies or actions has been streamlined, and in some
instances has been eliminated or greatly reduced.
Incentives for selecting on-site permanent remedies include, under certain conditions, waiver
of hazardous waste TSD permits.
12
-------
What Massachusetts is Doing to Encourage Innovation
Dean S. Spencer, Esquire
Senior Deputy General Counsel
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
I. Overview of DEP Organization
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
Regional Offices
II. Overview of Redesigned Waste Site Cleanup Program
A. Vision:
More private sector responsibility for cleanup at most sites
More public sector focus on site discovery and on cleanup of the worst sites
B. Principal features:
Licensed Site Professionals (LSPs)
"Best Response Action Management Approach" (BRAMA) to achieving level of no
significant risk
Two tier site classification system
Oversight/audit
C. Impact on business strategy:
Over 5,000 sites, nearly all overseen by LSPs
Predictable standards
DEP innovative technology coordinator
III. DEP's Innovative Technology Initiative
A. Regulatory elements:
Hazardous waste treatment/recycling
Toxic use reduction waivers
Closed loop recycling
Small water supply systems
Septic systems
B. Administrative elements: Innovative Technology Workgroup
13
-------
Session 2:
Defining the Market
for Innovative
Remediation
Technologies
-------
Defining the Market for Innovative Remediation Technologies:
Domestic Markets
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Speaker Slides/Overheads
17
-------
&EPA
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites:
Markets and Technology Trends
Market Study Overview
**
Assist developers/investors by characterizing future
demand
View remediation as an opportunity for new firms
Focus on site characteristics rather than costs
Use existing information plus an analysis of Superfund
19
-------
Sites/Facilities to be Cleaned Up in the U.S.
Program
Superfund
RCRA Corrective Action
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)
Dept. of Defense (DOD)
Dept. of Energy (DOE)
Other Federal Agencies
States
Approximate Number
1,500-2,100
1,500-3,500
295,000
7,300 (at 1,800 installations)
4,000 (at 110 installations)
350
19,000*
* Sites needing some further investigation that might lead to cleanup
Available Information for Market Analysis
**
Cleanup Site Site Technology
Program Identification Characterization Analysis
Historical
Selection
Trends
Superfund
Dept. of
Defense
UST
Dept. of
Energy
RCRA
Other
Federal
Agencies
States
O
O
20
-------
Treatment and Disposal Decisions
for Source Control tt
100
100%
Percent of
Source 60
Control
Records of
Decision 40
Containment, Containment & Disposal
Some Treatment
Some Innovative Treatment
82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
Fiscal Year
October 18,1993
Superfund Remedial Actions: Summary of Alternative
Treatment Technologies Through
Fiscal Year 1992 tt
(Total Number of Technologies = 598)
Established Technologies (335) 56%
Off-site Incineration
(92) 15%
On-site Incineration-
fee) 11%
Solidification/Stabilization
(165)28%
ODaODDDDDD
DoooaaaoDDooDa
aoaaaooaaaaaaa
DaDDOOODnDDDD
DaDDODQDonaon
DODGOQDOOODOO
ODnnaooDDDDD
aoooDODooao
Innovative Technologies (263) 44%
Soil Washing (20) 3%
Solvent Extraction (5) < 1 %
Ex situ Bioremediation (34) 6%
In situ Bioremediation (26) 4%
In situ Flushing (20) 3%
Soil Vapor Extraction
(107) 18%
Dechlorination (5) <1%
In situ Vitrification (3) < 1 %
\
Other Established (10) 2%
\ Chemical Treatment (3) < 1 %
\ Thermal Desorption (32) 5%
Other Innovative (8) 1%
21
-------
Treatment Trains at Superfund Remedial Sites
tt
First Step
Thermal Desorption
Soil Washing
Incineration
Solvent Extraction
Other
Total
Subsequent Steps
Incineration, Solidification or
Dechlorination
Incineration, Slurry-Phase
Bioremediation, or Solidification
Solidification
Incineration or Solidification
Number
of Sites
13
11
8
3
11
46
Note: Does not include sites for which residuals management
not determined.
September 29, 1993
Superfund Remedial Actions:
Application of Innovative Treatment
Technologies tt
Number
of 60-
Applications
im vocs
CD SVOCs
EEO Metals
Soil Vapor Thermal Bio- In Situ Solvent Soil
Extraction Desorption remediation Flushing Extraction Washing
Innovative Technology
September 29, 1993
22
-------
Frequency of Volatile Organic Compounds, Semi-volatile
Organic Compounds, and Metals at NPL Sites Without RODs **
goo-
ISO
Number
of Sites 100-
rf\
oO
n-
58%
%M&>X&»I(MWJS^~%>ZXW&0&WXKXX'
'4
139
110
/ -7
52
f.
TotalVOCs = 318
Total SVOCs= 143
Total Metals = 277
^ * »*
Contaminant Groups
Frequency of Contaminant Subgroups Present in all
Matrices at NPL Sites Without RODs **
Number
of Sites
400
300-
200-
100-
277
223
71
61
50
24
22
LEGEND
VOCs
svocs
Metals
Contaminant Subgroups
23
-------
Estimated Quantities of Contaminated Material
Intermediate-Term Market
(Total quantity = 26 million cubic yards)
10,000-
8,000-
6,000-
Cubic Yards
(x 1,000) 4,000
2,000-
' Includes explosives, radon, nitrates, and other organics
Findings for Future Superfund Markets
The most common contaminants in the intermediate-term market (3-5 years):
- VOCs (60% of sites)
Metals (53% of sites)
SVOCs (27% of sites)
EPA will select technologies for at least 26 million cubic yards of
contaminated material at 523 sites in the intermediate term
An additional 400 to 800 sites compose the longer-term demand (to be listed
on the NPL by the year 2000)
The greatest potential needs for new technology in the Superfund program
are for treatment of ground water in place and treatment of metals in soil
There is a trend toward more treatment of soil in place
24
-------
RCRA TSD Processes **
c
5,165 RCRA Corrective Action Facilities
Land Disposal
Processes
(2,381)
Underground Injection (88)
Landfill (531)
Surface Impoundment (1,307)
- Treatment (319)
- Storage (689)
- Disposal (299)
Waste Pile (310)
Land Treatment (145)
Incinerator
Processes
(298)
Storage &
Treatment
Processes
(6,468)
Tank (2,611)
- Treatment (783)
- Storage (1,828)
Container (3,152)
Other (705)
Location of RCRA Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities **
NUMBER OF SITES
301 to 400
M 201 to 300
101 to 200
1 to 100
25
-------
Commonly Managed Wastes
in RCRA SWMUs in 1986 **
Ignitable waste
Corrosive waste
Reactive waste
Waste oil
Spent halogenated/
nonhalogenated solvents
Metals (lead, chromium,
silver)
Wastewater treatment
sludge from
electroplating
Oil-water separator
sludge from petroleum
refining
SWMU = Solid Waste Management Unit
Contents of Federally Regulated Tanks**
Hazardous Material (2%)
Empty (2%)
Heating Oil (3%)
Kerosine (3%)
Used Oil (4%)
Diesel Fuel (20%)
Other (5%)
Gasoline (61%)
26
-------
Cleanup of Petroleum-Contaminated Soils
In Situ Treatment (19%)
Thermal Treatment (13%)
Land Treatment (11
Other (2%)
Landfilling (55%)
Cleanup Required at UST Sites
Approximately 295,000 sites containing at least 56 million
cubic yards of soil and debris require cleanup
Although the size of UST sites varies widely, the average
site contains about 190 yards of contaminated soil and
debris and three tanks
91% of USTs contain petroleum products
27
-------
Number of DOD Sites to be Cleaned Up
Navy (16%)
1,163
Army (37%)
2,728
Air Force (26%)
1,867
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) (1%T ._ , ,, , _ , _.t ,,_. irio. //>no/ .
a 80 Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) (20%)
1,475
Top Four Contaminant Groups at DOD Sites
**
Petroleum, oil, lubricants, or sludge are found at 42%
of Navy sites, 36% of Air Force sites, and 31% of
Army sites
Heavy metals are found at 25% of Army sites, 11 % of
Navy sites, and 2% of Air Force sites
Solvents are found at 22% of Navy sites, 14% of Army
sites, and 11 % of Air Force sites
Pesticides are found at 7% of Army sites, 7% of Navy
sites, and 2% of Air Force sites
DOD has not identified all contaminants at about half of the sites
28
-------
Examples of DOE Installations To Be Cleaned Up
State Installation/Site
CA Energy Technology
Engineering Center
Laboratory for
Energy- Related
Health Research
Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory
Lawrence
LJvermore
Laboratory
Sandia National
Laboratory -
LJvermore
Program
Information Status
Includes A/C
D&D
Includes A/C
D&D
A/C
On NPL A/C
A/C
*
*
*
Matrices of
Concern
Soil, Ground
Water
Soil, Ground,
Water,
Masonry,
Metals, Sludge
Soil, Ground
Water
Soil, Ground
Water
Soil, Buried
Material
Examples of
Known Soil
Contaminants
Low-level
Radioactive
Waste
Nitrate, Sr-90,
Ra-226, VOCs,
C-14
Chlordane, Cr,
H-3
Unknown
Gasoline,
Explosives,
VOCs
Diesel Fuel Oil,
Benzene, Pb
Est.Soll
Vol. To Be
Remediated
(Cu.Yards)
Unknown
20,000
Unknown
Unknown
EstCost
^94-98
^millions
$25.7
$27.5
$24.2
$353.9
$18.5
A/C = Assessment and characterization activities in progress
D&D = Decontamination and decommissioning
Number of Federal Agency Sites Needing Cleanup
Agency
Department of Agriculture
Central Intelligence Agency
Department of Commerce
Environmental Protection Agency
General Services Administration
Health and Human Services
Department of the Interior
Department of Justice
National Aeronautics and Space Admin.
Postal Service
Small Business Administration
Tennessee Valley Authority
Department of Transportation
Department of the Treasury
Veterans Administration
Total
Total Sites Evaluated
91
1
9
15
18
5
337
9
12
5
1
17
101
2
11
634
Sites Needing Cleanup
73
0
2
5
3
1
168
7
10
0
0
3
74
0
3
349
29
-------
State Hazardous Waste Cleanup Programs
Of 69,000 sites identified, 19,000 will need some level of
action*
States with the most sites are: Michigan (2,844),
Massachusetts (2,224), and Pennsylvania (1,067)
State trust fund balances totaled $2.2 billion at the end of
1991
States with the largest totals were New York ($977
million), New Jersey ($410 million), and Michigan ($398
million)
'Action may range from further investigation to cleanup. Many will not require remedial action.
** U.S. EPA, Technology Innovation Office, Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends,
PB93-140762, April 1993. Available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) at 703-487-4600.
tt U.S. EPA, Technology Innovation Office, Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report, EPA-542-R-
93-003, September 1993. Available from EPA at 703-308-8800.
30
-------
Defining the Market for Innovative Remediation Technologies:
International Markets
Jonathan C. Menes
Acting Assistant Secretary for Trade Development
U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration
Abstract not available at this printing.
31
-------
States' Market Perspectives: New York
James Harrington
Chief, Technology Section
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
As with most states that have had a significant amount of industrial activity for many years, there
are a huge number of sites where hazardous materials have been disposed on the ground. This
disposal was the result of standard practice with little or no knowledge of the hazards these activities
presented to the environment. Many of these contaminated areas will have to be cleaned up. Sites
that must be cleaned up fall in to several different categories which require differing levels of
regulatory involvement or approval. Categories of cleanups conducted under regulatory oversight
include inactive hazardous waste sites, active facilities undergoing corrective action, and petroleum
spills. Another universe of cleanups that do not have regulatory oversight in New York are those
resulting from environmental assessments usually from property transactions or by parties trying to
get sites cleaned up before they end up in the regulated category-
It is almost universally accepted that there are not enough resources or capacity to remediate
these sites using conventional remedies such as incinerating the waste mass or excavating and
redisposing in a landfill. It is also accepted that all of these materials do not require the highest
degree of treatment/protection that these conventional remedies provide. Treatment technologies are
needed that are less expensive and easier to implement than traditional technology but will still
provide an adequate degree of protection to human health and the environment.
New York State is committed to promoting the use of innovative technologies provided the
necessary protection of human health and the environment will occur. In order for government to
select these newly developed technologies, demonstrations of their effectiveness, at least the field
pilot scale, are necessary or there must be commitment to deploy a traditional remedy promptly in the
event that the new technology fails. Financing for development of these emerging technologies is not
available from State government but must be sought from the private sector financial markets or from
responsible parties who would benefit from the new technology.
32
-------
States' Market Perspectives: Connecticut's Aggressive Economic
Development Programs
Robert W. Santy
Deputy Commissioner
Connecticut Department of Economic Development
Connecticut's aggressive economic development programs are designed to retain and create
jobs and investment in the State's economy. A study measuring Connecticut's economic
competitiveness for specific industries against other states is currently being completed. Technology
based, high value added manufacturing companies will form the basis of future economic growth in
Connecticut. Because the market for new clean air and remediation technologies is growing in the
Northeast, Connecticut has targeted environmental industries for growth and for state assistance. In
addition to individual company assistance, Connecticut is supporting the development of critical
technology centers at state colleges and universities through grants and program development. The
Environmental Research Institute at the University of Connecticut is an example of one such center.
State environmental and economic development policies will be major drivers in the adoption of
new remediation technologies. Connecticut state government will be an aggressive participant in
environmental industry development.
33
-------
States' Market Perspectives: Massachusetts
Anna G. Symington
Environmental Analyst
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Environmental Protection
The Commonwealth's Waste Site Cleanup program has undergone a major redesign to
streamline and accelerate cleanup of releases of oil and hazardous materials (OHM) to the
environment, thereby allowing the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP)
to focus its resources on sites that the private sector cannot or will not handle, as well as the more
critical sites. Some of the key features of the new program and new regulations (the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan (MCP) include notification thresholds and timeframes for releases or threat of
releases of OHM, risk-based cleanup standards, the encouragement of early risk reduction measures
and accelerated assessment and remedial actions, and a design to keep the "small" problems out of
the system, thereby providing an incentive for minor cleanups involving recycling, reuse, treatment, or
disposal of soils. The Commonwealth is presently handling between 5000-6000 sites of which
approximately 3000 are confirmed disposal sites. The DEP directly oversees approximately 300 of
these. The most frequently encountered contaminant found is petroleum, specifically gasoline,
followed by chlorinated solvents and metals. Phase III of the revised MCP involved the identification
and evaluation of remedial action alternatives that may incorporate innovative technologies to address
contaminants at these disposal sites. The MassDEP is presently developing innovative technology
guidance documents and review protocols to encourage and expedite the development of innovative
and alternative technologies within the Commonwealth.
34
-------
Session 3:
Sources of Market
Information and
Other Resources
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: New York
James Harrington
Chief, Technology Section
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
See page 32 for Mr. Harrington's abstract.
37
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: New York
State Center for Hazardous Waste Management
Ralph R. Rumer, Sc.D.
Executive Director
New York State Center for Hazardous Waste Management
The New York State Center for Hazardous Waste Management was created by law in 1987 and is
funded by appropriations from the state and by contributions from industry and participating
institutions. The major purpose of the Center is to develop new and improved methods and
technologies that will enable more cost-effective cleanup of environmental contamination, including
treatment of hazardous waste so that it can be safely disposed. To date, the Center has funded 43
projects located at 12 different educational institutions in New York State and two industries. Most of
the projects awarded to educational institutions have industry partners that share in the cost. The cost
of this research program now totals nearly $8 million, with the Center share matched by the
participating institutions and industry partners. The Center issues an annual solicitation for research
and development projects, encouraging business-industry-university partnerships.
Current projects include: development of surfactant flushing as a method to recover DNAPL from
the subsurface; long term stability of vitrified incinerator ash; modification of a plant process to
produce a useful material from a hazardous solid waste generated in the manufacture of silicone
products; a waste stream reduction study to demonstrate the feasibility of using glow discharge
technology to pretreat metal surfaces; field demonstration of thermal desorption for remediation of
MGP sites; enhancement and optimization of reductive dechlorination of PCB contaminated
sediments; combustion characteristics of emulsified hazardous liquid wastes; optimizing the
incineration of hazardous liquid wastes containing water and solids; a demonstration of photocatalytic
remediation of PCB-contaminated media; a review and evaluation of containment technologies for
remediation applications; and development of metal ion removal from hazardous waste streams by
impregnated ceramic membranes.
The Center sponsors workshops, roundtables, and conferences for environmental consultants,
industry, agency personnel, and technology vendors addressing specific issues of current interest,
with publication of summary white papers. Although headquartered at the University at Buffalo, the
research and development activities stretch statewide, with demonstration projects sometimes
occurring out-of-state. The Western New York Technology Development Center, located adjacent to
the university campus, offers incubator services for start-up businesses.
38
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: New York
State Science and Technology Foundation
Jack Van Wie
Operations Analyst
New York State Science and Technology Foundation
The general public and government have been successful in fostering a high level of sensitivity
within industry regarding environmental and hazardous waste issues. Now it's time to stop finding
fault and start finding workable solutions together! Hopefully this will help to bring down the spiraling
cost of site cleanup, which is driven by an extremely fragmented, site by site approval process, and
lack of a clear technology evaluation and testing approach. This is compounded by the higher
number of fall-out technologies (many very good) and investor losses, because of their inability to
survive the drought period between research and success, which requires untold sums of money and
patience. Liability must also be addressed, minimized and shared by all if we are to seriously work
together. Otherwise we can be assured of increasing company failures, negative social impact,
greater unemployment and eventually a cleanup effort we can't afford. We have an epidemic on our
door step and we haven't stopped fighting among ourselves about whose to blame (including related
lawsuits). In the meantime, it keeps devouring our precious resources and eventually ourselves! We
need a united and cohesive (government, industry and public) offensive, not self defense or self
enrichment actions which detract from our efforts, while wasting precious time and money we don't
have!
The New York State Science and Technology Foundation's Corporation for Innovation
Development (CID) Program (a venture capital organization) seeks to aid technologically advanced
start-up firms in their plight to bridge the gap between research and eventual success. Unlike other
industries, the environmental industry possesses many contradictions, which pose almost
insurmountable barriers for a small investment fund and company. As a result, the Foundation's
mission to encourage, support and promote the growth of technological enterprise in New York State
and foster the spirit of entrepreneurship continues to be somewhat illusive related to this industry!
39
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: NJDEPE
Innovative Treatment Technologies in Site Remediation
Barry Frasco, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
The New Jersey DEPE has several ways of providing/sharing innovative/alternative treatment
technology and related information with the public. These include:
I. Laws and regulations concerning the conduct of cleanups at contaminated sites in New
Jersey.
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation (N.J.A.C. 7:26E)
Procedures for Department Oversight of the Remediation of Contaminated Sites
(N.J.A.C. 7:26C)
Discharges of Petroleum and other Hazardous Substances (N.J.A.C. 7:1 E)
New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (N.J.S.A. 5810:10-23.11)
New Jersey P.L 1993, c. 139 [includes the Industrial Site Recovery Act,
supplements/amendments to N.J.S.A. 58:10 and amendments to P.L 1993, c.112
(lender liability)]
II. The Discharge Cleanup Organizations List (pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:IE).
III. Various department publications.
Site Remediation Program Site Status Report
Site Remediation News (newsletter)
Comprehensive Site List (available mid-1994)
IV. Seminars and conferences.
Co-sponsor with NJ Water Pollution Control Federation
Co-sponsor of NJ Environmental Expo
Presentations at various U.S. EPA and private sponsor conferences
In-house presentations by various innovative treatment technology vendors
V. Participation in advisory committees including the Northeast Hazardous Substances
Research Center and the NJ Spill Fund Research program.
VI. Participation and cooperation with programs and committees of the National Governor's
Association and ASTSWMO.
40
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: The Center
for Environmental Engineering and Science Role as a Support
to Innovation
Peter B. Lederman, Ph.D.
Director, Hazardous Substance Management Research Center
New Jersey Institute of Technology
The Center for Environmental Engineering & Science (CEES) is a consortium of environmental
research centers sponsored by:
The National Science Foundation
The Environmental Protection Agency
The New Jersey Commission on Science & Technology
Industry
The Department of Energy and the Department of the Army also provide support through
membership.
The Center supports research and development programs in all areas of environmental concern
concentrating on Hazardous Material:
Prevention
Treatment
Remediation
It also supports work in policy development, communications and health effects. This is done by
identifying areas of interest to the Center's sponsors that have scientific merit and then soliciting
responsive proposals to meet those needs. The work is principally carried out in seven universities
located in the Northeast: NJIT, MIT, Stevens, Princeton, Rutgers, UMDNJ, and Tufts. In addition, the
Center maintains relationships with universities and other centers throughout the United States.
CEES provides technical support to the investigators, assists in everything from finding industrial
development partners, to pursuing patent applications, to licensing, to helping find venture capital.
Thus CEES supports a development from conception to commercialization.
The Center has as part of its responsibilities the identification and nurturing of start-up companies
with innovative technologies. It works in cooperation with the incubator at NJIT, as well as with
stand-alone enterprises, to assist them in bringing their ideas to fruition and the marketplace. We are
interested and support good science, but have a reputation for taking ideas out of the laboratory into
the field. This is probably unique for a university-based research organization.
Two examples may provide a better insight into the CEES operation. The first is Pneumatic
Fracturing. This is a patented technology that loosens up the soil so that contaminants can be more
easily removed. When used properly it can reduce costs by several hundred thousand dollars per
acre treated. The technology was developed by an NJIT Professor and his students. It was
41
-------
supported financially by funds provided by GEES. CEES located a small remediation company
which helped to develop the process in the field and supported a SITE demonstration. In the
meantime CEES continued to support the work at the University for further development and
pursued a patent on behalf of the Professor. CEES then negotiated the first license on behalf of the
inventor, the university and CEES. Members of the Center obtain a royalty free license for their own
use. The royalty fees will be shared by the center for further research, the university and the
inventor. This process is launched and additional licenses will be negotiated.
The second example deals with a proprietary soil washing process. The inventors had already
filed for patent protection. They came to the Center for support. The Center provided space for a
pilot unit and analytical support. It has helped the company by supporting a SITE emerging
technologies effort, providing entries into member companies and assisting with finding venture
capital. The company is now designing and building a small full-scale field unit for a major chemical
manufacturer for use at a contaminated site.
The center also does special research projects for industry, as well as government agencies on
a contract basis where its facilities and skill base can make a contribution so long as the work is of
scientific merit and is within the scope of the Center's charter. CEES is ready to help foster
innovative technologies and entrepreneurs who have conceived, or are developing technologies to
solve the hazardous material challenges that we must meet.
42
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: Business
Opportunities for Innovative Environmental Technologies in
Connecticut
Domenic Grasso, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor
Environmental Research Institute, University of Connecticut
The University of Connecticut has poised itself to assist Connecticut industries in developing
and commercializing innovative environmental technologies. The University of Connecticut has
invested in state-of-the-art laboratories and attracted nationally recognized faculty to facilitate
realization of these goals. Greater than three million dollars worth of research is conducted at the
University of Connecticut's Environmental Research Institute annually. An Environmental
Entrepreneurial Center is currently under development at the University of Connecticut that will
marshal multi-agency teams consisting of Connecticut Departments of Economic Development and
Environmental Protection, University of Connecticut Critical Technology Centers, and the sponsoring
Agency. These teams will facilitate and simplify the product development process, ensuring
technical, economic, and regulatory soundness. The attached slides schematically describe the
opportunities available and the structure of the University of Connecticut programs.
43
-------
ERI Critical Technologies
Pollution
Prevention
Critical Technology
Focus Areas
Site
Remediation
Marine
Technology
- Chemical
Substitution
Alternative
Processes
-Alternative
Materials
- In-Process
Recycling
Off-Site
Recycling
Soil Treatment
- Groundwater
Oxidation
- Monitoring
- Feasibility
- Treatability
Modeling
- Soil Chemistry
Water Quality
Food Production
Monitoring
Treatment
Systems
1993
ERI Critical Technologies
Pollution Prevention
TOPICS
Polymer Coatings
Polymer Compatibilizers
Grinding
Electroplating
Alternative Chemical
Synthesis,
Biological Polymer
Production
- Gas Phase Catalysis
- Bromine Recovery
- Lime Recovery
- Colloid Chemistry
t\ickfl Recovery
Alternative Fuels
Fuel Cells
Hazardous Chemicals in
Plastics
Lead Solder
Organohalidc Recycling
SPONSORS
- Alcoa
- USEPA
USDA
- TVA
- Liquipure
International Fuel Cells
- ConnDOT
- CT Transit Authority
- NIH
- NIEHS
- Beer Sugar Devel. Found.
- American Plastics Council
- United Technologies Corp.
National Chromium Corp.
1993
45
-------
ERI Critical Technologies
Site Remediation
SPONSORS
TOPICS
Gronndwaler Modeling
Transport Processes
Heavy Metals
Volatile Organics
Soil Vapor Extraction
Bioveutiitg
VOC Gas Recycling
Air Sparging
Chan Standards
Remediation
Optimization
Colloid Transport
Ordnance Remediation
Soil Washing
USEPA
ConnDOT, CTDEP
American Petroleum Council
' United Technologies Corp.
- National Chromium Corp.
U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers
- U.S. Army Toxics and
Hazardous Materials Agency
L'.S. Geological Survey
Olin Chemical
Battelle Memorial Institute
VAPEX Environmental
Technologies Inc.
- U.S, Department of Energy
Veeder-Root Corporation
ENVIRON Corporation
- Balsam Engineering
- Fuss and O'Niel
TESS Corp.
Hamilton Standard Corporation
1993
ERI Critical Technologies
Marine Technology
TOPICS
Aquicultnre Systems
Marine Sensors
Monitoring
Contaminants in
Food Chain
Non-Point Nutrients
Water Resources
Coastal Engineering
SPONSORS
- C & M Technologies, Inc.
- U.S. Geological Survev
- CTDEP
- USEPA
- National Science Foundation
1993
46
-------
ERI Critical Technologies
Pollution
Prevention
Critical Technology
GOALS
Site
Remediation
Marine
Technology
Technology Development and Advancemen
- Prototyping and Demonstration
Technology and Know-how Center
- New Technology Acceptance
- Interdisciplinary Teams
- Multi-Agency Teams
- Minority Participation
1993
ERI Critical Technologies
ERI CRITICAL
TECHNOLOGIES CENTER
Environmental
Research Institut
Marine Sciences
Institute
INTERDISCIPLINARY
TEAM
Institute
of
Materials Scienc
Photonics
Research Centet
1993
47
-------
ERI Critical Technologies
ERI Critical
Technology Program
TECHCONN
Environmental
Entrepreneurial
Center
\
- CT Environmental Industry Advisory Board
- Inventory of Environmental Businesses
- Technology Transfer
Technology Development
- Technology Demonstration
- Host Location to Environmental Business Council
of .Yen' England
- Development of Facilitated Technology
Demonstration in Connecticut with CTDEP,
CTDED, Companies
1993
ERI Critical Technologies
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENTREPRENEURIAL CENTEi
Economic
Development
Environmental
Protection
MULTI-AGENCY
TEAM
ERI
Critical
Technology
Sponsoring
Company
1993
48
-------
ERI Critical Technologies
ERI CRITICAL
TECHNOLOGIES CENTER
I
SSF F AC I LIT IE
T
ERI Analytical
Labs
7,000 sq.ft. Longley
2,500 sq.ft. @ MSI
Move to Research Park
Pollution Prevention
Labs
8.000 sq.ft. Longley
Addition
^^m
ERI Engineering
Labs
1.000 sq.ft. LongJey
1,200 sq.ft. Eng.H
1,200 sq.ft. FLC
3,000 sq.ft. UTEB
Move to Research Park
Env. Entrp. Center I
Business Office |
Hartford Location
1993
49
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources: U.S. Small
Business Administration
Jo-Ann Van Vechten
District Director, Hartford District
U.S. Small Business Administration
A summary of the technical, financial and management assistance programs administered by the
U.S. Small Business Administration was discussed.
An explanation was provided of the memo of understanding (MOU), signed November 1993,
between the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Small Business Administration designed
to ensure that the U.S. government effectively encourages, supports and enables U.S. small
businesses to develop, market and/or adopt cost-effective environmental technologies to achieve
economic growth and environmental compliance. The objectives of the MOU are to:
Identify management assistance needs of environmental technology developers and
establish a program where those needs can be met
Identify funding needs and determine if existing SBA programs satisfy those needs
Develop strategies to provide multi-media pollution prevention, technical, and financial
assistance to small business
Inform and assist small businesses with EPA regulations
Encourage environmental technology developers to export.
Slide presentation follows.
51
-------
SBA'S MISSION
Provide Technical assistance
Provide Financial assistance
Provide Management assistance
53
-------
SBA/EPA MEMORANDUM
OBJECTIVES
Identify Management Assistance Needs
Identify Funding Needs
Develop strategy to provide multi-media
pollution prevention technical and
financial assistance to small business
Strategy to encourage environmental technical
developers to export
SBA/EPA will identify regulatory reform
approached to ease burden on small
businesses
SBA/EPA participate in joint conferences to
provide both management and technical
assistance to small businesses.
54
-------
SBA SERVICES
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
LOAN PROGRAMS
SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION
AND RESEARCH
FEDERAL CONTRACT
PROCUREMENT
55
-------
RESOURCES
HARTFORD DISTRICT HELP DESK
240-4654
SBA ON-LINE
1-800-859-INFO
(baud modem 2400)
1-800-697-INFO
(baud modem 9600)
CONNECTICUT SMALL BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT CENTER
John R. Lewis, Associate State Director
203-486-1826
56
-------
Sources of Market Information and Other Resources:
Massachusetts
Anna Symington
Environmental Analyst
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
See page 34 for Ms. Symington's abstract.
57
-------
Session 4:
How Does a
Technology Get
Selected?
-------
Selection of Innovative Technologies: A Large Company
Perspective
Mark Sneeringer, Ph.D.
Manager, Remediation Vendor Development
GE Corporate Research and Development
The Environmental Laboratory at GE Corporate Research and Development was established in
1989 to evaluate and develop remediation technologies to address GE's clean up needs. Commercial
and near commercial technologies have been examined over the last three years, resulting in a 600
entry database for use by GE project managers and process developers. Approximately 50 of these
have been subjected to in-depth evaluation. Criteria applied to the technologies include safety,
effectiveness at reaching clean up standards, cost, and vendor viability. Based on this background,
the Environmental Lab is working on a wide variety of remediation technologies, moving them to the
marketplace. This development experience has reinforced some of the items that must be addressed
by a company offering an innovative technology. These are realistic process flow diagrams and
costs, understanding of the limitations and flexibility of the process, and the assumptions that have
been made in projecting full scale performance from laboratory or pilot information.
Slide presentation follows.
61
-------
CR&D Environmental Laboratory
History
Environmental Research Center (ERC) formed November, 1989
- Focus on remediation cost management
- Programs throughout rest of GE CRD
- Evaluation of vendor technologies
Environmental Technology Laboratory established 1990
- Chemists, chemical engineers, mechanical engineers
- Integrated into ERC 9/91
Bioremediation Laboratory integrated into ERC January, 1992
- Biologists, biochemists, chemical engineers
- Hudson River study team
- World experts on biodegradation of PCBs
Project Management, Technology Transfer/Market Development,
Toxicology functions added 1992
- No GE environmental business
- Working with partners to commercialize technologies
Pollution Prevention programs begun 1992, expanded 1993
- Solvent substitution task force
- Working with GE businesses to solve cross cutting problems
Name change to Environmental Lab, August 1993
- Addition of bioreactions and health effects groups
CR&D Environmental Laboratory
EL Focus Areas
o Remediatio
Cost control and reduction
o Process
o Product ^- Competitive advantage
63
-------
CR&D Environmental Laboratory
Technology Evaluation
Need understanding of available technologies
- Commercial and pre-commercial
Database for remediation technologies and vendors
- Approximately 600 entries
- Search capabilities by key words, company, technology, etc.
- Focused at project managers, technology developers
Technology evaluations
- Approximately 50 to date
- From design reviews to field pilots (-10% of cases)
Assist GE Businesses. Establish base line
for development efforts.
CR&D Environmental Laboratory
Technology Evaluation Criteria
Safety
- Chemicals used
- Equipment
- Process
Process Effectiveness
- Meet clean-up standards?
- Robust?
- Speed
Residuals/Emissions
Cost
- Capital Equipment
Operating and
Maintenance
Vendor
- Resources
- Cooperation
- Experience
Process Maturity
Cost is only one of several factors
64
-------
CR&D Environmental Laboratory
Remediation Technologies
Soil washing and thermal processes for organic contaminants
Organic "sponge" for capture of solvents, other contaminants
Mercury decontamination of soil, debris and process waste
Radio Frequency Ground Heating and Surface Heating Blanket
Thermal Surface Decontamination (Buildings)
Rapid field analysis
Biodegradation of PCBs
Hudson and Housatonic Rivers
Identification and enhancement of organisms
Biodegradation of chlorinated solvents
Broad range of technologies to address
remediation needs
CR&D Environmental Laboratory
Remediation Process Development
license
Vendor
Technology
Environmental
Lab
- Basic Studi
- Improve/
Complement
Existing
Technology
Invent New
Technology
- System
Integration
icense
partner
Other
Applications
(Royalties)
GE
Remediation
Sites
Leverage EL and partner capabilities for
cost effective clean-up of GE sites
65
-------
CR&D Enwmnmmmt iLaBQFS^&fy
Presenting a technology for a client's consideration
Realistic process flow diagrams
- Include all unit operations
- Map out paths for all fractions of materials treated and used
- Mass balances
- Good PFD often points to process weaknesses, development needs
Realistic cost estimations
- Include all aspects of the process
- Capital amortization over reasonable periods
Understanding of process limitations and flexibility
- Handling of surprises
Minimization of assumptions
- Process safety questions, real and perceived
- Process residuals
- Materials of construction and control systems for full scale
Making the contaminant disappear only part of the equation
66
-------
How Does a Technology Get Selected? A Vendor's Perspective
Eugene Herman, J.D.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Molten Metal Technologies, Inc.
Speaker Slides/Overheads
-------
Outline of Presentation
The Jury: Key Factors and Barriers
Molten Metal Technology - Our Experience
Establishing a Demonstration Facility
' Permitting
' The Regulator as a Customer
> Collaboration Strategies
» Helpful Steps and Resources
Establishing an Innovative
Environmental Technology: "The Jury"
Regulators
Community
Commercial Users
69
-------
Key Factors in Securing an Innovative
Environmental Technology's Acceptance
Safety and environmental integrity
Technical efficacy
Economic benefit
Pollution prevention hierarchy
Technology-based requirements
Permitting and siting
Molten Metal Technology
Growing and Commercializing CEP
Milestones
First Financing
I Patents
3 Employees
L'Air Liquidc
Rollins
Du Pont
AM-RE
100 Ib. Operational
36 Employees
Fluor Daniel
Second Financing
1 ton Operational
6 ton Operational
Fall River Facility
16 Patents, 4 Allowed
65 Employees
1st Plant Engineered
BOAT Program
Recycling Precedent
Fnll River Facility Operations
DOE PKDA
25 Patents, 4<1 Applications,
3 Allowed
110 Employees
4-6 New Agreements
2-3 Plants Under Construction
DOE Program Expansion
Expansion of Fall River Facility
Value Engineering Program
Product Enhancement
BOAT Program
Expand Intellectual Property
200+ Employees
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
70
-------
Catalytic Extraction Processing (CEP)
Solids
Liquids
Sludges
Gases
Industry
Government
Households
Elemental Recycling Process
What goes in?
- Solids, sludges, liquids, gases
What happens?
- Dissolution at 2,400-3,200°F
What comes out?
- Saleable products: metals, gases,
inorganics
CEP Recovers Resources
Sealed Hood System
All
Elements Gases
Gas
Purifier
Recovered Gases:
~*-CO, H , N , etc.
L
Recovered Inorganics: A12O3, SiO2/CaO, etc.
Recovered Metals: Fe, Cr, Ni, etc.
Flux and
Reactant
Additives
Recycle
>-Coproducts
Solids, Sludges,
Liquids, Gases
Solution
Chemistry
Gases,
Inorganics,
Metals
71
-------
Facility Scope
M^M^«^^^^Mw«y^^^^u««ittuis<^u^^^MfiHcraB|^u^ujnu(^£«
Recycling R&D Facility - Fall River, Massachusetts
Commercial-scale trials
Recycling demonstration and information development
Intellectual property development
Value engineering/system enhancement
Operator training
HI
Fall River Facility Developmental Efforts
Over a year of constructive dialogue and efforts with all
involved and interested parties
- Governmental officials - Federal, State and City
- Fall River community and environmental representatives
Construction of the Facility
HI
72
-------
Dialogue With State Officials/MADEP
Over 14 months of constructive, on-going dialogue regarding
permitting and environmental requirements
Permitting approach formally agreed to in June 1992
Permit applications filed June-December 1992
Project/Schedule Agreement October 1992
Treatability, air and sewer connection permits issued
August-December 1992
Dialogue With Federal Officials/EPA
Initial discussions in 1991 and frequent 1992 updates in Boston
and Washington
Confirmed only State permitting required
MADEP requested EPA views in September 1992 on R&D
recycling permit
EPA sign-off in November 1992
73
-------
Dialogue With Fall River Community
Almost one year of constructive on-going dialogue regarding
assurance of safe operations and effective communication
"Open Door" policy established, hundreds of visitors in 1992
On-going community advisory input and communication
HI
Dialogue With Fall River Officials
Over one year of constructive on-going dialogue regarding
selecting the site, assuring safe operation and compliance with
local requirements
Detailed discussion and planning with all key City officials and
relevant departments, most particularly the Fire Department
and Board of Health
Public meetings/hearings Quly 1992 and October 1992)
Agreement executed regarding conditional 150B determination,
storage and processing limits, liability insurance and local
permits (March 1993)
HI
74
-------
Agreement Between City of Fall River
and MMT - March 1993
Significant joint effort between several City of Fall River
agencies (particularly the Fire Department) and MMT
Sets forth MMT obligations and responsibilities with regard to
notification, transportation, storage, and processing of
hazardous materials and emergency response
Requires MMT to obtain approvals from the Fall River Fire
Department before processing specified types and volumes of
hazardous materials
HI
Fall River Major Permit Approval Status
Treatability Study -issued August 1992 and February 1993
Air Permit to Construct - issued September 1992
Operating Air Permit - issued December 1992
Siting Approval - granted March 1993
R&D Recycling Permit - issued September 1993
75
-------
R&D Recycling Demonstrations
MADEP Permit
Perform treatability study
Review results
Submit R&D Recycling Certification Application
Perform authorized R&D recycling evaluation
Making the Regulator Our Customer
Educating the regulators re CEP advantages
Establishing and maintaining good working relationships
Monitoring evolving agency policies and concerns
Helping regulators address their needs
76
-------
Collaboration Strategy
Commercial partners Martin Marietta Energy Systems,
Clean Harbors
Commercial development AM-RE, Fluor Daniel,
L'Air Liquide
Safety and environmental design Du Pont, Rollins, L'Air Liquide
Engineering and construction Fluor Daniel, Davy
Resources Required to Establish an
Innovative Environmental Technology
Technological
Environmental
Managerial
Financial
HI
77
-------
Helpful Steps: MMT Experience
Working closely/early with the regulators at all levels
Working closely/openly with the community
Establishing strategic alliances to assure necessary resources
Building a full-scale demonstration facility
78
-------
Session 5:
How Does a Firm
Obtain Business
Funding and
Support?
-------
-------
-------
Federal Technology Transfer Act
New relationship between Federal laboratories and private
organizations
Act removes barriers to collaboration
Encourage joint Cooperative R&D Agreements with the goal of
commercialization
Purposes of FTTA
Promote technology development
Encourage cooperation between federal, academia and
industry innovators
Increase innovation to enhance competitiveness
Improve use of federal technology developments
85
-------
CRADA Mechanisms
Non-competitive
Competitive
- announced in CBD
- advertised in Journal(s)
- have Technology Transfer Presentation on proposed
joint ventures
Advantages to Cooperative Research &
Development Agreements (CRADAs)
Removes many legal and institutional barriers to collaborate
among federal and private laboratories
Negotiated agreement
Can provide royalties for organization/EPA Laboratory
Team efforts increase chance of success
86
-------
Benefits to Industry
Expands cooperative R&D capability
Permitted test facilities
Access to research knowledge, experience, equipment and
facilities
Impact EPA's research
Licensing capabilities to new technologies
Benefits to EPA Mission
Improve environmental protection through technology
development
Cost-effective environmental protection
Enhance U.S. international competitiveness
87
-------
R&D Accomplished thru CRADAs:
Underground Storage Tanks
Hazardous Waste Technologies
Superfund Cleanup Technologies
Bioremediation
Drinking Water
Air Pollution Control
Instrumentation
Human Health Studies
EPA Has Signed Agreements With:
Trade Association Fortune 500s
Examples: Examples:
- AWWARF-American Water Works - Exxon
- Assoc. Research Foundation - Shell
- EPRi - Ford
- Water Quality Association - DuPont
Mid -Size Companies Small Business
Examples: Examples:
- Perkin-Elmer - Ultra Scientific
- CH2M Hill - Lewis Publishers
-------
Types of FTTA Agreement Cooperators
small business
large business
academia
trade association
medium business
Delegation of Authority
Authority must be delegated to Laboratory/Office Director
Approximately 110 EPA Laboratory/Office Directors have
have authority to sign agreements
Exclusive/Non-exclusive license and R&D agreements
89
-------
Future
Expand the capability to compete in the International market
place
Increase tax base by creating new jobs
Develop new technologies more relevant to market needs
90
-------
SB A Loan Program
Gary W. Besser
Chief of Finance Division, Hartford District
U.S. Small Business Administration
The U.S. Small Business Administration guaranteed loan program assists small business access
to capital through loan guarantees to banks which lend the funds necessary for growth, expansion,
purchase of machinery and equipment, owner-occupied real estate, and a variety of other uses.
A written business plan which discusses the company's product or service, the history of the
company and why it is projected to be successful is an essential component of a commercial loan
application in today's lending environment.
SBA loans may be written for longer maturities than a conventional bank loan. Also, there are no
"balloon" notes under the SBA program; the length of the note is equal to the amortization schedule.
Other advantages include the possibility of obtaining financing without adequate collateral from a
bank's perspective, no points to the bank, no prepayment penalties, and interest rates subject to SBA-
determined maximums. Loan guarantees are generally between 75-90% of the total loan request, up
to a maximum SBA dollar exposure of $750,000.
SBA's pollution control program is dedicated for the planning, design or installation of a pollution
control facility. The purpose of the funding is to prevent, reduce, abate or control noise, air/water
pollution by removing/altering/disposing/storing pollutants which will ultimately be collected, treated
or disposed. The maximum SBA dollar exposure in this guaranty program is $1,000,000.
All potential SBA applicants should determine their eligibility to receive an SBA-guaranteed loan.
The size of the small business (including affiliates) must be a small business by SBA standards, the
nature of the activity must be eligible, and personal resources of the owners must be utilized to an
extent determined reasonable by SBA prior to SBA involvement. In the instance of a company
wishing to introduce a new product or service to market, SBA could potentially assist at the point
when research and development have been completed and the product or service is ready to be
produced for sale.
SBA financing is increasingly becoming a staple by banks to provide loans to small business.
Experienced SBA lenders can quickly provide the capital your business needs if your company is
determined creditworthy. We encourage you to discuss this program with your local bank or SBA
office for more details.
91
-------
Barriers and Solutions to Commercializing Remediation
Technologies for Economic Profit
Dag M. Syrrist
Vice President
Technology Funding, Inc.
Speaker Slides/Overheads
93
-------
Cost of Compliance
Marginal
improvements
are increasingly
costly with
existing
technologies
Cost
B
1
Current
technology
Environmental
Exposure
Environmental Technology
Market
New technologies
can lower cost
and emissions,
reducing risk
and liabilities
Cost
Current
technology
B A
Environmental
Exposure
95
-------
Barriers
Information
Testing and demonstration
Permitting process
Reference sites
Unproven companies
Investment capital
Commercialization model
Capital Shortage
Environmental
technologies
face a capital
shortage at the
commercialization
stage due to the
unique barriers
Commercialization
R&O
Growth
96
-------
Imperfect Technology Market
Perceived level
of high risk value/
Risk
Low valuations
' ^ "*V f Value
Market
Acceptance Tjme
Creating Consensus
Capital
Industry and Users ^^fl ^^ Technology Sources
Regulators
Advisors
Public
97
-------
Environmental Industry Needs
Opportunity to generate a profit
Large domestic market
Testing and demonstration facilities
Predictable permitting process
Appropriate liability laws
SIC codes and commerce data
Accounting and SEC standards
Technology protection abroad
Environmental Company Needs
Good technology
Credible performance data
Regulatory consensus
Superior cost advantageous
Vision for your company
Credible business model
Reasonable execution plan
Sufficient capital to get there
98
-------
Environmental Investor Needs
Competitive return on investments
Competitive return on investments
Competitive return on investments
Competitive return on investments
Competitive return on investments
Competitive return on investments
Competitive return on investments
Competitive return on investments
No really,
Opportunity based on better economics
Unique technology
Superior management
Value added pricing
A path to success
Quantifiable risk based on cost and
performance
High expected rate of return
99
-------
Technology Funding
190 portfolio companies
Over $300 million under management
Annual Technology Funding
Environmental Conference
Leading U.S. environmental
venture capital firm
Proactive government interaction
Advisory Boards and Committees
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- National Advisory Council on
Environmental Policy and Technology
(NACEPT)
-Technology, Innovation and Economics
Committee (TIE)
-Technology Diffusion Focus Group (DFG)
100
-------
Advisory Boards and Committees
« U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Department of Energy
- National Laboratory Strategic Task Force
- ER/WM Industrial Executive Roundtable
-Technology Venture Corporation - Sandia
National Laboratories
- Oak Ridge Center for Environmental
Technologies (GET)
Advisory Boards and Committees
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Department of Energy
California EPA
- Environmental Technology Advisory
Council (ETAC)
-California Environmental Technology
Partnership (CETP)
- Financing Barrier Technical Working
Group (FBTWG)
- Regulatory Reform Technical Working
Group (RRTWG)
101
-------
Advisory Boards and Committees
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Department of Energy
California EPA
Regional and business
- Western Governors Association (WGA)
-California Environmental Business
Opportunity Project (CEBO)
- Environmental Business Council of
the United States (EBC-US)
-California Environmental Business
Council (CEBC)
Rapid commercialization of
environmental technologies
for profit
102
-------
List of Speakers
Edgar Berkey
President
National Environmental Technology
Applications Center
615 William Pitt Way
Pittsburgh, PA 15238
412-826-5511
412-826-5552 (FAX)
Eugene Berman, J.D.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Molten Metal Technology, Inc.
51 Sawyer Road
Waltham, MA 02154
617-487-7622
617-487-7870 (FAX)
Gary W. Besser
Chief of Finance Division
U.S. Small Business Administration
Hartford District Office
330 Main Street, 2nd Floor
Hartford, CT 06106
203-240-4671
203-240-4659 (FAX)
Larry Fradkin
Director, FTTAct Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Science and Planning
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
513-569-7960
513-569-7132 (FAX)
Barry Frasco, Ph.D.
Assistant Director for Hazardous Site Science
New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy
401 E. State Street
CN413
Trenton, NJ 08625
609-633-6801
609-633-2360 (FAX)
Domenic Grasso, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Environmental Research Institute
University of Connecticut
Department of Civil Engineering
191 Auditorium Road
U-37
Storrs, CT 06269-3037
203-486-2680
203-486-2298 (FAX)
James Harrington
Chief, Technology Section
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road, Room 208
Albany, NY 12233-7010
518-485-8792
518-457-1088 (FAX)
Timothy Keeney
Commissioner
Connecticut Department of Environmental
Protection
79 Elm Street
P.O. Box 5066
Hartford, CT 06102-5066
203-566-2110
203-566-7932 (FAX)
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Solid Waste and Emergency Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(5101)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
202-260-4610
202-260-3527 (FAX)
Elliott P. Laws
Assistant Administrator for Solid
Waste and Emergency Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Room SE360-5101
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
202-260-4610
202-260-3527 (FAX)
103
-------
Peter B. Lederman, Ph.D.
Director
Hazardous Substance Management Research
Center
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Center for Environmental Engineering &
Science
Newark, NJ 07102
201-596-3006
201-802-1946 (FAX)
Jonathan C. Menes
Acting Assistant Secretary
for Trade Development
U.S. Department of Commerce
International Trade Administration
Room 2815
14th & Constitution Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20230
202-482-5145
202-482-4614 (FAX)
Ralph Rumer, Sc.D.
Executive Director
New York State Center for Hazardous
Waste Management
207 Jarvis Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-4400
716-645-3446
716-645-3667 (FAX)
Robert W. Santy
Deputy Commissioner
State of Connecticut
Department of Economic Development
865 Brook Street
Rocky Hill, CT 06067-3405
203-258-4203
203-258-4359 (FAX)
Mark Sneeringer, Ph.D.
Manager of Remediation Vendor Development
General Electric
Corporate Research and Development
Building K-1, Room 3A25
P.O. Box 8
Schenectady, NY 12301
518-387-5334
518-387-7611 (FAX)
Dean S. Spencer, Esquire
Senior Deputy General Counsel
Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection
One Winter Street
Boston, MA 02108
617-574-6824
617-338-5511 (FAX)
Dag Syrrist
Vice President
Technology Funding, Inc.
2000 Alameda De Los Tulgas
Suite 250
San Mateo, CA 94403
415-345-2200
415-341-1400 (FAX)
Anna Symington
Environmental Analyst
Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection
436 Dwight Street
Springfield, MA 01103
413-784-1100
413-784-1149 (FAX)
Jo-Ann Van Vechten
Acting District Director
U.S. Small Business Administration
Hartford District Office
330 Main Street, 2nd Roor
Hartford, CT 06106
203-240-4671
203-240-4659 (FAX)
Jack Van Wie
Operations Analyst
New York State Science and Technology
Foundation
99 Washington Ave.
Suite 1730
Albany, NY 12210
518-473-9741
518-473-6876 (FAX)
104
-------
List of Attendees
Ramin Abrishamian
Associate Principal
Remediation Technologies, Inc. (RETEC)
9 Pond Lane
Cambridge, MA 01742
Carl W. Allen
Oil & Hazardous Materials Specialist (OHMS
II)
State of Maine, Dept. of Environmental
Protection
1235 Central Drive
Presque Isle, ME 04769
Robert F. Allen
Program Officer
U.S. Dept. of Energy
One Congress Street
Boston, MA 02114
William Askins
Principal Engineer
HGCL
261 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
Scott Atkin
Environmental Engineer
Anchor Engineering Services, Inc.
287 Main Street
East Hartford, CT 06118
James A. Aylward
Executive Vice President
Harvard Desigh & Mappling Co., Inc.
80 Prospect Street
Cambridge, MA 02139-2503
Steve Bagle
President
M & L Power Systems Maintenance, Inc.
109 White Oak Lane
Old Bridge, NJ 08857
Ralph S. Baker, Ph.D.
Principal Soil Scientist
ENSR Consulting and Engineering
35 Nagog Park
Acton, MA 01720
Artie Baldwin
Health & Safety Manager
Fenley & Nicol Environmental, Inc.
445 Brook Ave.
Deer Park, WY 11729
Robert C. Barbour
Industrial Environmental Technology Student
Naugatuck Comm. Tech. College, Waterbury,
CT
P.O. Box 303
Norfolk, CT 06058-0303
F. A. Bares
Principal
U.C.I. Consultants
68 Fletcher Street
Winchester, MA 01890
W. Thompson Barren
Vice President
Newport Contractors, Inc.
304 E. Ayre Street
Wilmington, DE 19804
Jay Bassin
Environmental Management Support
8601 Georgia Avenue
Ste. 500
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Barbara Bastenbeck
Business Development Specialist
NES/IES
44 Shelter Rock Road
Danbury, CT 06810
105
-------
M. Hamdy Bechir, Ph.D.
Executive Vice President, Environmental
Engr.
Cascio Bechir Engineers
21 Washington Avenue
North Haven, CT 06473
Richard Beckenbach
Business Manager
Laborers' Local Union #675
7 Harmony Street
Danbury, CT 06810
Robert Bednar
Regional Manager
ENSYS
200 Carnegie Center
Suite 201
Princeton, NJ 08540
Ram Beniwal
Applied Earth Technologies
571 Bee Street
Meriden, CT 06450
Edgar Berkey
President
National Environmental Technology
Applications Ctr
615 William Pitt Way
Pittsburgh, PA 15238
Jonathan Herman
Market Analyst
Molten Metal Technology, Inc.
51 Sawyer Road
Waltham, MA 02154
Eugene Berman, J.D.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Molten Metal Technology, Inc.
51 Sawyer Road
Waltham, MA 02154
Gary W. Besser
Chief of Finance Division
U.S. Small Business Administration
Hartford District Office
330 Main Street, 2nd Floor
Hartford, CT 06106
Paul M. Bigwarfe, Sr.
Senior Associate
Erdman Anthony and Associates
259 Monroe Avenue
Rochester, NY 14607
Linda Bischoff
Senior GIS Analyst/Marketing Manager
Applied Geographies, Inc.
33 Broad Street
Boston, MA 02045
John A. Bitler
Consultant
Exide Corporation
401 S. 4th Street
Denver, PA 17517
Eric Bluth
Consultant
Advanced Technologies
106 Broadway
Bethpage, NY 11714
Ann Bogle
Marketing Administrator
Canonie Environmental
500 North Gulph Road
Suite 315
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Neil T. Boles
Inland Waters Pollution Control, Inc.
275 Scituate Avenue
Johnston, RI 02919
Jennifer Bothwell
Environmental Scientist
Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.
700 Canal Street
Stamford, CT 06902
106
-------
Antonia Bouchard
President
TerraTech Incorporated
103 Bridge Plaza
Ogdensburg, NY 13669
James Bowen
Senior Hydrogeologist
Lincoln Environmental Inc.
22 Krieger Lane
Glastonbury, CT 06033
Karen Brody
Project Manager
Ground water Technology, Inc.
Kennedy Business Park II
4311 Hayden Station Rd.
Windsor, CT 06095
Robert Burke
Vice President
Clark Environmental Services, Inc.
1000 Frank E. Rodgers Blvd. 11A
Harrison, NJ 07029
Chuck Burns
Vice President
Lozier Engineers, Inc.
1050 Pittsford - Victor Road
Pittsford, NY 14534
Jack Burt
President
Biosystems, Inc.
5 Brookside Road
Middlefield, CT 06455
Ronald Butt
Manager, Business Development
Ebasco Environmental
211 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02110
Paul D. Cacciamani
Senior Vice President
Synergist, Inc.
110 Terrace Drive
Blakely, PA 18447
Bradley Calkins
Branch Manager
Rochester Midland Corporation
668 E. Nine Mile Road
Ferndale, MI 48220
Suzanne Campbell
Conference Coordinator
JACA Corporation
550 Pinetown Road
Fort Washington, PA 19034
Robert Carley
Associate Director
Environmental Research Institute
Route 44
Longley Building, U-210
Storrs, CT 06269-3210
Howard Case
Salesman
Thermatrix
P.O. Box 470
Palmer, MA 01069
Shawn Cashman
Business Manager
Laborers' Local Union #611
1000 West Main Road
New Britain, CT 06058
Lee Chen
Branch Manager
Rochester Midland Corp.
101 C Constitution Blvd.
Franklin, MA 02038
Mark Cicalese
Supervising Engineer
McLaren\Hart Environmental Engineering
Corp.
25 Independence Blvd.
Warren, NJ 07059
John C. Clark, Jr.
Clark Management Associates, Inc.
581 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02116
107
-------
Barry Clarke
Chief Operating Officer
North East Environmental Products, Inc.
17 Technology Drive
West Lebanon, NH 03784
James Clemente
President
Laborers' Local Union #455
3 Baer Circle
East Haven, CT 06512
Diana Coates
Environmental Business Council of New
England, Inc
Exchange Plaza
53 State Street, Suite 3400
Boston, MA 02109
Wayne W. Cobleigh
Senior Account Manager
Groundwater Technology, Inc.
431 (F) Hayden Station Road
Windsor, CT 06095
Robert Cochran
Senior Vice President
HazWaste Industries, Inc.
2233 Tomlynn Street
Richmond, VA 23230
Michael J. Cody
Connecticut Operations Mananger
ERM-Northeast
4 Armstrong Road, Building #2
Shelton, CT 06484
Barry S. Cogan
Business Development Manager
Canonie Environmental
500 North Gulph Road
Suite 315
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Leo Cohen
Chairman
Mercury Refining Co., Inc.
1218 Central Avenue
Albany, NY 12205
Lon S. Cohen
Director, Sales and Marketing
Balsam Environmental Consultants, Inc.
5 Industrial Highway
Salem, NH 03079
Michael Collins
President
ERI
405 New State Road
Manchester, CT 06040
Robert W. Comley
Managing Associate
Dames & Moore
2325 Maryland Road
Willow Grove, PA 19090
Bernadette Conant
Hydrogeologist
Environmental Project Control
63 Great Road
Maynard, MA 01754
John J. Condino
Business Development Director
OP-TECH Environmental Services, Inc.
6630 Ely Road
P.O. Box 2158
Syracuse, NY 13220
Janet R. Cordano
Marketing Projects Manager
New England Treatment Company
55 Old Field Point Road
Greenwich, CT 06830
Steven H. Corr, P.E.
Senior Vice President
Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc.
5 Centennial Drive
Peabody, MA 01960
Peter John Cotch
Business Development-Principal
McLaren\Hart
1685 Congress Street
Portland, ME 04102
108
-------
Jay Curran
Project Manger
Atlantic Environmental Services, Inc.
188 Norwich Avenue
Colchester, CT 06415
Thomas F. Dalton, Ph.D.
Consultant
Consulting Services
12 Jerrys Drive
Burlington, NJ 08016
John Damron, Ph.D.
Waller & Associates
P.O. Box 122
Ware Neck, VA 23178James De Angelis
President
Soil Testing, Inc.
140 Oxford Road
Oxford, CT 06483
Ernie Delaney
Area Manager
Hanna Instruments
584 Park East Drive
Woonsocket, RI 02895
Richard Desrosiers
Senior Hydrogeologist
Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
142 Temple Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Steve Detwiler
Director, Market Development
ETG Environmental
660 Sentry Parkway
Blue Bell, PA 19422
Rose Di Meo
President
Hampton-Clark, Inc.
47 Carey Avenue
Butler, NJ 07405
Linda B. Diamond
Manager, Software Applications Development
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
110 Hartwell Avenue
Lexington, MA 02173
Gregory M. Dobbs, Ph.D.
Senior Consulting Scientist
United Technologies Research Center
Mail Stop 129-90
411 Silver Lane
East Hartford, CT 06108
Thomas J. Dolan
President
NERAMA Corp.
P.O. Box 971
Melrose, MA 02176
Lise Dondy
Managing Director, Investments
Connecticut Innovations, Inc.
845 Brook Street
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
Brian Dooley
Director of Business Development
TRC Environmental Corporation
5 Waterside Crossing
Windsor, CT 06095
Rich Dougherty
PRC
1505 PRC Drive
McLean, VA 22102
Conal C. Doyle
Manufacturer Representative
Clivus Multrum Inc.
1 Eliot Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Scott R. Drew
Director of Business Development
Vapox Environmental Technologies, Inc.
480 Neponset Street
Canton, MA 02021
Ed Duffield
Consulting Services
19 New Street
Mullica Hill, NJ 08062
109
-------
Kitty Duncan
Business Development Specialist
U.S. Small Business Administration
330 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06112
Linda Durante
Evaluation Analyst
Kemper Management Services, Inc.
107 Oakwood Drive
Glastonbury, CT 06033
Susan L. Erickson
Manager - Business Development
CF Systems
3D Gill Street
Woburn, MA 01801
Patrick Espinoza
President
Espinoza Consultants and Services
3915 Research Park Drive
A-13
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
Tom Fascio
Field Representative
Laborers' Local Union #665
269 Federal Street
Bridgeport, CT 06340
Roger S. Faulkenberry
Vice President
Huntingdon Capital Corp.
41 South High Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Kelly Faulkner
Promotions Assistant
TRC Environmental Corporation
5 Waterside Crossing
Windsor, CT 06095
David S. Fedor
Vice President
Environmental Waste Technology, Inc.
(EWT)
1039 Chestnut Street
P.O. Box 38
Newton Upper Falls, MA 02164
Kathleen A. Feldman
Director of R & D and QC
Earthgo, Inc.
Route 207
Box 143
Lebanon, CT 06249
Linda Fiedler
Project Manager
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Technolgoy Innovation Office
(5102W)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Allyn Finegold
Sr. Staff Assistant
National Governor's Association
444 N. Capitol St.
Washington, DC 22001
Anton Finelli
Principal
Commonwealth Resource Management
199 Corey Street
Boston, MA 02132
Steve Finn
Associate
Colder Associates, Inc.
305 Fellowship Road
Suite 200
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Harvey Fisher
Director
Environmental Partners
22 Nickerson Road
Lexington, MA 02173
William R. Fisher
Director, Design and Remediation Services
ABB Environmental Services, Inc.
110 Free Street
P.O. Box 7050
Portland, ME 04112-7050
110
-------
Larry Fradkin
Coordinator, FTTAct Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Science and Planning
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Barry Frasco
Asst. Director for Hazardous Site Science
NJDEPE
401 E. State Street
CN413
Trenton, NJ 08625
Mark E. Fraser
Principal Research Scientist
Physical Sciences Inc.
20 New England Business Center
Andover, MA 01810
Michael C. Freshour
Envirobusiness Coordinator
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202
Jerald Friedman
Environmental Construction Manager
Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
142 Temple Street
New Haven, CT 06615
William E. Fristad, Ph.D.
Director TerraMet Technology
Cognis, Inc.
2330 Circadian Way
Santa Rosa, CA 95407
Rolf E. Funer
Technical Director
AMP-AKZO
3205 Cardiff Drive
Wilmington, DE 19810
J. Robert Gallagher
President
ENV. EX. Environmental Engineering
Company
3245 Sunset Lane
Hatboro, PA 19040
Lester Garvin
Vice President
Resource Management Systems, Inc.
19 No Name Road
Stow, MA 01775
Annette Gatchett
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
RREL/STDD (MS-215)
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Ron Gehl
Principal
EOS Research, Ltd.
6 Market Square
Portsmouth, NH 03801
Maurizio F. Giabbai, Ph.D.
Senior Vice President
HazWaste Industries, Inc.
2264 Northwest Parkway
Ste. F
Marietta, GA 30067
M. L. Gibson
President
Commercial Recycling Systems
2 Gibson Road
Scarborough, ME 04074
Thomas Gibson
Vice President
Commercial Recycling Systems
2 Gibson Road
Scarborough, ME 04074
Alfredo J. Giliberto
President
EPAT, Inc.
260 Chatham Road
West Grove, PA 19390
Frank Giordanella
Murtha, Cullina, Richter and Pinney
City Place I
185 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT 06103-3469
111
-------
Barry Giroux
Project Manager
Atlantic Environmental Services, Inc.
188 Norwich Avenue
Colchester, CT 06415
Douglas Gleason
General Manager
Commercial Recycling Systems
2 Gibson Road
Scarborough, ME 04074
Richard J. Gleason
Manager of Hazardous Waste Services
Ebasco Environmental
211 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02110
Allen N. Goland, Ph.D.
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Dept. of Applied Science, Bldg. 815
Upton, NY 11973-5000
Michael J. Goodman
Senior Associate
Technology Marketing Associates
10 Jill Lane - Unit B
Sterling, MA 01564
Glenn S. Goral
Director, Remediation and Assessments
Corporate Environmental Advisors
141 Ballard Street
Worcester, MA 01607
Domenic Grasso, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Environmental Research Institute
University of Connecticut
Department of Civil Engineering
191 Auditorium Road, U-37
Storrs, CT 06269-3037
Paul Greene
Regional Manager - Northeast
Zimpro Environmental, Inc.
451 Clifton Corporate Park
Clifton Park, NY 12065
G. Margaret Griscavage
Assistant Director, Administration
Hazardous Substance Management Research
Center
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Newark, NJ 07102-1982
Donald W. Groff, Ph.D.
Deputy Director of Environmental Services
Storch Associates
31 Merwin Brook Road
Brookfield, CT 06804
Joseph F. Guida
Vice President of Sales
Environmental Waste Technology, Inc.
(EWT)
1039 Chestnut Street
P.O. Box 38
Newton Upper Falls, MA 02164
Dominic Guinto
Marketing and Sales Director
Doolan Environmental
2 Eves Drive
Marlton, NJ 08053
Dhirendra K. Gupta, P.E.
Chairman
DKI Group Engineers, Inc.
One Van Patten Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
David J. Gworek
Vice President, Engineering
C\P Utility Services Co., Inc.
119 Sanford Street
Hamden, CT 06514
Russell F. Haas
Barrier Member Containment Corp.
401 Whitney Avenue
Suite 326
Gretna, LA 70056
Matthew E. Hackman
Senior Project Manager
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
27 Naek Road
Vernon, CT 06066
112
-------
Roger Hager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
12565 West Center Road
Omaha, NE 68144-3869Kevin Hall
President
H.C.S. Environmental Construction
P.O. Box 1196
Upper Marlboro, MD 20773
Chuck Hammond
Program Assoc. Environmental Services
NIST\N. E. Manu. Technology Center
385 Jordan Road
Troy, NY 12180
Harold J. Hanser
Vice President
L & W Research Inc.
121 N. Plains Indian Road
Wallingford, CT 06492
James Harrington
Chief, Technology Section
NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road, Room 208
Albany, NY 12233-7010
Michael Hatem, CHMM
Manager- Project Development
Consulting Environmental Engineers
100 Shield Street
West Hartford, CT 06110
D. Gary Heathcock
Senior Engineer
Wehran Engineering Corporation
6 Riverside Drive
Suite 101
Andover, MA 01810
Jeffrey S. Heimerman
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Technology Innovation Office
(5102W)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Robert E. Henderson
Director, MarketingYTechnical
Biosystems, Inc.
5 Brookside Drive
Middlefield, CT 06455
John A. Herd
Manager of Operations
Ensign-Bickford HAZ-PROS, Inc.
100 Grist Mill Road
P.O. Box 369
Simsbury, CT 06070
Cindy Herleikson
Environmental Coordinator
Laborers- AGC Education and Training Fund
37 Deerfield Road
P.O. Box 37
Pomfert Center, CT 06259
Alison Hieber
Marketing Coordinator
Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc.
72 Danbury Road
Wilton, CT 06897
Ronnie D. Hill
Operations Manager
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
Bldg. G, Suite 520
5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Rd., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30342
Frank Hillery
RIM
198 Fisher Avenue
Boston, MA 02120Bill Himebaugh
Sales\Project Manager
Ultrox Division of Zimpro Environmental,
Inc.
2435 S. Anne Street
Santa Ana, CA 92704
James J. Hines
Consultant
Enviro Business, Inc.
701 Concord Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
113
-------
Dennis Hogerheide
President
Kal Con
418 South Maples
Kalkaska, MI 49646
Steve Holtman
Principal
EOS Research, Ltd.
6 Market Square
Portsmouth, NH 03801
Michael E. Hopkins, P.E.
President
Hopkins Environmental Management, Inc.
74 Boston Post Road
Madison, CT 06443
Michael E. Hopkins, P.E.
President
Hopkins Environmental Management, Inc.
74 Boston PostRoad
Madison, CT 06443
Jeffrey E. Hoppe
Vice President-Engineering
Pollution Management Industries
5994 Broadmoor Drive
La Mesa, CA 91942
Brian Home
Director
Seaview Thermal Systems
P.O. Box 3015
Blue Bell, PA 19422
Mike Hudson
Division Manager
H & GCL, Inc.
180 Canal Street
Boston, MA 02114
Cathy Iverson
Marketing Manager
Integrated Chemistries, Inc.
1970 Oakcrest Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55113
Vincent M. Izzi
Principal
Sagamore Consulting
P.O. Box 338
Sagamore Beach, MA 02567
Joseph T. Jacobsen
President
Environmental Services of America, Inc.
INTEX Div
212 Main Street
Doylestown, PA 18901
Peter Jaran
Environmental Engineer
CH2M Hill
1781 Highland Avenue
Cheshire, CT 06410
John R. Jimenez
President
Environmental Compliance, Inc.
101 Mt. Bethel Road
Warren, NJ 07059
John D. Jolls
Vice President
Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc.
5 Centennial Drive
Peabody, MA 01960
Mural i Kalavapudi
Senior Environmental Engineer
Energetics, Inc.
7164 Columbia Gateway Drive
Columbia, MD 21046
Adele R. Kaplan
220 Newtonville Avenue
Newton, MA 02158
Paul Kaplow
President
Ecoquest Corporation
103 Withrow Road
Sewickley, PA 15143
114
-------
Stephen Kaufman
General Manager
Sunshine Technology Corporation
2475 Albany Avenue
West Hartford, CT 06117
Lisa W. Kaul
Senior Environmental Engineer
Environmental Project Control
63 Great Road
Maynard, MA 01754
Andrew J. Kawczak
Environmental Quality Engineer
General Electric Company
100 Wood Lawn Ave.
Pittsfield, MA 01201
James Keane
President
Kenterprise Research Inc.
23 South Harlan St.
York, PA 17402
Marion Keane
Vice President
Kenterprise Research Inc.
23 South Harlan St.
York, PA 17402
Patrick J. Keaney
Business Development Manager
PTI Environmental Services
1601 Trapelo Road
Waltham, MA 02154
Robert S. Kearton
Marketing & Sales Manager
Sippican, Inc.
7 Barnabas Rd.
Marion, MA 02738
Annette Keegan
Editor
Waste Business Magazine
85 Somerset Avenue
Toronto, Ontario, CANADA, M6H 2R3
Matthew Keegan
Publisher
Waste Business Magazine
85 Somerset Ave.
Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M6H 2R3
Timothy Keeney
Commissioner
Connecticut Dept. of Environmental Protection
79 Elm Street
P.O. Box 5066
Hartford, CT 06102-5066
Margaret M. Kelly
Acting Director, Technology Innovation Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(5102W)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Michael J. Kirby
Vice President/Environmental Services
UTILX Corporation
2240466th Ave., South
Kent, WA 98064
Leon Kirschner
Director
Industrial Hazard Analysts Inc.
P.O. Box 431
Skokie, IL 60076
Carl Klepper, Jr.
Project Manager
Fenley & Nicol Environmental
445 Brooke Ave.
Deer Park, NY 11743
J. Michael Knecht, Jr.
Sales Manager
Modern Electric, Inc.
7221 Baltimore Annapolis Blvd.
Glen Burnie, MD 21601-2799
Jerry Knot
Sales Manager
Northeastern Analytical Corporation
125 Michael Drive
Syosset, NY 11791
115
-------
Keith F. Knowles
President
Advanced Thermal Concepts, Inc.
15 Border Street
Cohasset, MA 02025
Janies F. Koester, P.E.
Environmental Management Systems
28 McKinley Avenue
Easthampton, MA 01027-2013
Arthur M. Kohler
President
The Green Book Report
100 Burtt Road
Andover, MA 01810
Leo Kokoszks
Prin. Engineer
SCI-TECH Inc.
360 Main Street
Middletown, CT 06457
Robert W. Kortmann, Ph.D.
President
Ecosystem Consulting Services, Inc.
430 Talcott Hill Road
Coventry, CT 06238
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
OSWER
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(5101)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Hugo Kranz
Controller
New England Treatment Company
55 Old Field Point Road
Greenwich, CT 06830
Kim Lisa Kreiton
Environmental Engineer
U.S. EPA
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Jan Kruger
Materials Engineer
Commercial Recycling Systems
2 Gibson Road
Scarborough, ME 04074
Norm Kulujian
Engineer
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Peter F. Kuniholm
Vice President
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
One International Blvd.
Mahwah, NJ 07495
James La Due
General Manager - Technology Division
Recra Environmental
10 Hazelwood Drive
Amherst, NY 14228
David La Monica
President
Rochem Separation Systems
3904 Del Amo Blvd.
Suite 801
Torrance, CA 90503
Len LaVardera
Business Development
Eli Eco Logic International, Inc.
143 Dennis Street
Rockwood, Ontario CANADA NOB 2KO
Joan Lacava
President
Thermo Analytical\Skinner & Sherman
P.O. Box 521
300 Second Avenue
Waltham, MA 02254
Nicholas A. Laganella
President
P. T. & L. Environmental Consultants
One Kalisa Way
Suite 105
Paramus, NJ 07652
116
-------
Christine M. Lamprecht
President
Land, Air, Water Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 372
16 Cozine Road
Center Moriches, NY 11934
John M. Lamprecht
Vice President
Land, Air, Water Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 372
116 Cozine Road
Center Moriches, NY 11934
James H. Laplander, P.E.
Vice President/Director of Research
Geo Environmental
6075 East Molloy Road
Syracuse, NY 13211
Rob Larose
District Manager
Geo-Con, Inc.
1000 White Horse Road
Suite 402
Voorhees, NJ 08043
Elise K. Laugeni
Assistant Sales Manager
Sunshine Technology Corporation
2475 Albany Avenue
West Hartford, CT 06117
Diane L. Lauicella
President
Environmental Investigations Group
Suite 357
324 Main St.
Norwalk, CT 06851
Tim Laurion
Vice President
Bay Bank Boston, N.A.
175 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110
Elliott P. Laws
Asst. Admin, for Solid Waste & Emergency
Response
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Room SE360-5101
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Maureen C. Leahy
Regional Technical Specialist
Groundwater Technology
Kennedy Business Park II
431(F) Hayden Station Road
Windsor, CT 06095
Charles Leconche
Business Manager
Connecticut Laborers' District Council
475 Ledyard Street
Hartford, CT 06114
Peter B. Lederman, Ph.D.
Director
Hazardous Substance Management Research
Center
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Center for Environmental Engineering &
Science
Newark, NJ 07102
D.John Lee
President
Aneptek Corporation
209 W. Central Street
Natick, MA 01760
John R. Lewis
Associate State Director
Connecticut Small Business Development
Center
Middle Turnpiuke U-119, UConn
Storrs, CT 06269-5119
Stephen Lipmann
President
Environmental Research Analysis
P.O. Box 261
Irvington, NY 10533-1240
117
-------
John Liskowitz
Project Manager
Accutech Remedial Systems, Inc.
Cass Street @ Hwy. 35
Keyport, NJ 07735
John W. Liskowitz
Dist. Professor
New Jersey Institute of Technology
323 King Blvd.
Newark, NJ 07102
William S. Litwin
President
Guardian Environmental Technologies
P.O. Box 517
25 North Main Street
Kent, CT 06757
Gene P. Lohr
President
Envirotel, Inc.
1000 Nutt Road
Phoenixville, PA 19460
Pio Lombardo
President
Lombardo Associates, Inc.
49 Edge Hill Road
Newton, MA 02167
Cindy Loney
PRC
644 Lin Street, Suite 719
Cincinnati, OH 45203Dominick Lopreato
SecretaryYTreasurer
Connecticut Laborers' District Council
475 Ledyard Street
Hartford, CT 06114
William J. Lueckel
Vice President, Government Programs &
Marketing
Internationl Fuel Cells Corporation
P.O. Box 739
195 Governors Highway
South Windsor, CT 06074
David Maclean
Senior Hydrogeologist
Ground Water, Inc.
415 Killingworth Road
Higganum, CT 06449
John Manfredi
General Manager
Tirex-Scrap Tire Recycling
225 Railroad Avenue
Bedford Hills, NY 10507
Ruth Manfredi
Vice President
JM Associates, Inc.
225 Railroad Avenue
Bedford Hills, NY 10507
Paul A. Mar in
President
Ground Water, Inc.
415 Killingworth Road
Higganum, CT 06441
Ed Marinich
Waste Energy Specialist
Rochester-Midland
1 Cahpin Road
P.O. Box 661
Pine Brook, NJ 07058
Chuck Marshall
Vice President
JACA Corporation
550 Pinetown Road
Fort Washington, PA 19034
John Martin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
RREL-STDD (MS-125)
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
John P. McBurney
Senior Project Director
de maximis, inc.
186 Center Street
Suite 290
Clinton, NJ 08809
118
-------
Christopher W. McDermott
Project Manager
154 Hull Street
Hingham, MA 02043Richard McGavern
President
KLV Technologies
470 South Pearl Street
Canadaigua, NY 14424
Carolyn McGill
Conference Coordinator
JACA Corporation
550 Pinetown Road
Fort Washington, PA 19034
Robert J. Mclntyre
Senior Vice President
Envirotel, Inc.
1000 Nutt Road
Phoenixville, PA 19087
Scott McLean
Laboratory Director
Alpha Analytical Labs
Eight Walkup Drive
Westborough, MA 01581
Robert E. McPeak, Jr.
Department Manager
IBS, A Division of NES
44 Shelter Rock Road
Danbury, CT 06810
Jim McQuade
Manager, Business Development
Wehran Engineering Corporation
Andover Research Park, Six Riverside Drive
Suite 101
Andover, MA 01810-1121
Anwer Mehkri
President
CPRT, Inc.
6-22 Gurdwara Road
Nepean, Ontario, CANADA, K2E 8A2
Patrick Mele, Jr.
Business Manager
Laborers' Local Union #473
290 Merrill Road
Pittsfield, MA 01201
Jonathan C. Menes
Acting Assistant Secretary for Trade
Development
U.S. Dept. of Commerce, International Trade
Admin.
Room 2815
14th & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20230
George Mezzetta
Consultant
CC Inc.
1392 Des Mouettes
Longueuil, Quebec, CANADA J4J 5K2
Richard A. Miller
Director, Environmental Policies Council
CT Business & Industrial Associates (CBIA)
370 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT 06103
Scott A. Miller
Civil Engineer
Northeast Site Remediation
54 Alna Lane
East Hartford, CT 06108
Carmen Molina-Rios
Environmental Programs Manager
State of Connecticut-Dept. of Economic Dev.
865 Brook Street
Rocky Hill, CT 06062
David E. Montany
Project Engineer
Pratt & Whitney
400 Main St.
MS 105-11
East Hartford, CT 06108
119
-------
Jack Moody
Business Development Manager
R. E. Wright Associates
3240 Schoolhouse Road
Middletown, PA 17057
John Morico
Director
Clearwater Labs., Inc.
6 Industrial Circle
Hamden, CT 06517
Les Moschuk
Account Manager, Environ. Tech. & Services
AECL Research
Chalk River Laboratories
Chalk River, Ontario, CANADA, KOJ 150
Jeff Mosholder
Senior Project Engineer
HRP Associates
167 New Britain Avenue
Plainville, CT 06062
Barbara M. Moss
c/o Peter Moss
U.S. EPA
26 Federal Plaza
Room 13-100
New York, NY 10278
Peter D. Moss
Technical Advisor
U.S. EPA, Region II Superfund
26 Federal Plaza
Room 13-100
New York, NY 10278
Paul F. Muniz
Officer Director
Wehran Engineering
98 South Turnpike Road
Wallingford, CT 06492
Larry Murphy, P.E.
Project Manager
Anchor Engineering Services, Inc.
287 Main Street
East Hartford, CT 06118
Jim Murray
USETEC
7911 Herschel Avenue
Ste. 300
La Jolla, CA 92037
Ron Naar
Sales Representative
Research Environmental Industries
2777 Broadway Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44115
Samuel Nappi
Chief Executive Officer
Geo Environmental
6075 East Molloy Road
Syracuse, NY 13211
James H. Nash
President
Chapman, Inc.
P.O. Box 608
25 W. Highland Avenue
Atlantic Heights, NJ 07716
Jim Nash
Sales/Marketing Manager
Eli Eco Logic International, Inc.
143 Dennis Street
Rockwood, Ontario CANADA NOB 2KO
John Naso, Jr.
Vice President
Leggette Brashears & Graham, Inc.
72 Danbury Rd.
Wilton, CT 06896
Scott Nathan
Regional Director
H & GCL, Inc.
180 Canal Street
Boston, MA 02114
Christopher J. Newman
Account Coordinator
Sedgwick
10 Columbus Blvd.
Hartford, CT 06106
120
-------
Ronald Nobili
Business Manager
Laborers' Local Union #665
269 Federal Street
Bridgeport, CT 06340
*
Robert Notarfonzo
Technical Sales Respresentative
SOLARCHEM Environmental Systems
130 Royal Crest Court
Markham, Ontario CANADA L3R OA1
Susan Oman
Research Coordinator
Engergy Research Group
400 Fifth Ave.
Waltham, MA 02154
John P. Opsasnick
Project Manager Environmental Services
Sybron Chemicals, Inc.
Birmingham Road
P.O. Box 66
Birmingham, NJ 08011
Morton Orentlicher
Vice President
MFI
630 Third Ave.
New York, NY 10017
Dave Ott
Division Manager
Terra Vac
2 Park Drive
Suite 5
Westford, MA 01886
Roger Owens
Vice President
Ecolotrol, Inc.
1300 Shames Drive
Westbury, NY 11590
Clayton R. Page, III
Business Development Manager
SBP Technologies
6149 North Shore Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70817
Frank S. Pappalardo, CHMS
President
ENSA Tri-S Division
25 Pinney Street
Ellington, CT 06029
Richard M. Patrick
Research Engineer Plasma Fusion Center
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
167 Albany Street
Cambridge, MA 02139
Ralph Perkul
Manager
ABB
1460 Livingston Ave.
North Brunswick, NJ 08902
Jim Peronto, P.E.
Senior Consulting Engineer
TRC Environmental Corporation
5 Waterside Crossing
Windsor, CT 06095
Victor Perugini
Business Manager
Laborers' Local Union #390
284 Colonial Aenue
Waterbury, CT 06704
Major Charles C. Phillips
Engineer Plans Officer
U. S. Army
900 South Quaker Lane
West Hartford, CT 06110-1292
Mark Phillips
Environmental Quality Engineer
General Electric
100 Woodlawn Drive
Bldg. 11, Room 205
Pittsfield, MA 01201
Jim Phimister
Barenco Inc.
Box 295, Unit 8
11 Cardico Drive
Gormley, Ontario CANADA LOH 1GO
121
-------
Vince Pitruzzello
Branch Chief
U.S. EPA, Region II
26 Federal Place
New York, NY 10278
Mary Jane Pohero
Assistant Director, Administration
Northeast Hazardous Substance Research
Center
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Newark, NJ 07102
James H. Porter
Chairman- C.E.O.
UV Technologies, Inc.\E31
P.O. Box 215
E. Cambridge, MA 02141
John Powell
Project Engineer
Anchor Engineering Services, Inc.
287 Main Street
East Hartford, CT 06118
Michael Powers
Supvr. San. Engineer
Connecticut Dept. of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Management\PERD
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
Lawrence Prochorchik
Vice President Technologies
Environmental Resources Unlimited
72 Cannon Ridge Road
Watertown, CT 06795
Richard Ragaini
Project Manager
Angel Environmental Services, Inc.
2 Klarides Village
Suite 280
Seymour, CT 06483
B. V. Rao, Ph.D., P.O.
President
Groundwater Science & Env. Tech.
Consultants
98 Gaynor Place
Glen Rock, NJ 07452
Richard L. Raymond, Jr.
President
Terra Systems, Inc.
1035 Philadelphia Pike
Suite E
Wilmington, DE 19809
Ron Reed
Vice President
GDC Engineering
822 Neosho Avenue
Baton Rouge, LA 70802
Stephen Renwick
Physicist
L & W Research, Inc.
121 N. Plains Industrial Road
Wallingford, CT 06492
Gerard J. Ridzon
Associate
Wehran Engineering Corporation
6 Riverside Drive
Ste. 101
Andover, MA 01810
John Ripp
Principal
Atlantic Environmental Services, Inc.
188 Norwich Avenue
Colchester, CT 06415
Diana W. Rivet
President
Environmental Management Ltd.
35 Orangeburg Road
Orangeburg, NY 10962
Gina Robledo Nyberg
Engineer
E G & G Geos
237 Riverview Ave.
Waltham, MA 02154
122
-------
Susan Roche
Harvard Design & Mapping Co., Inc.
80 Prospect Street
Cambridge, MA 02139-2503
Richard C. Rogers, P.E.
Tower Hill Resources
195 North Tower Hill
Wassaic, NY 12592
John R. Roll
Consultant
UV Technologies Inc/E3I
P.O. Box 215
East Cambridge, MA 02141
Mark P. Roman
Manager, Operating Services
R. S. I. Environmental Field Services
5 Johnson Drive
Raritan, NJ 08853
Myron S. Rosenberg, Ph.D.
Vice President
CDM Federal Programs Corporation
98 N. Washington St.
Suite 200
Boston, MA 02114
Terry Rosfelder
Vice President\General Manager
Envirotel, Inc.
1000 Nutt Road
Phoenixville, PA 19460
Robert K. Ross
Marketing Manager
Terra Vac
806 Silvia Street
West Trenton, NJ 08628
James R. Roth
Laboratory Manager
Alpha Analytical Labs
Eight Walkup Drive
Westborough, MA 01581
Steven M. Rothstein
President
Environmental Futures, Inc.
530 Atlantic Avenue
Boston, MA 02210
Ivan Rudnicki
Technical Communication Specialist
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
110 Hartwell Avenue
Lexington, MA 02173
Dominick J. Ruggerio
Regional Coordinator
New England Laborers' Labor-Mgt. Coop.
Trust
7A Laborers' Way
Hopkinton, MA 01748
Ralph Rumer, Sc.D.
Executive Director
NY State Center for Hazardous Waste
Management
207 Jarvis Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-4400
Donald L. Russell
Commercial Officer
Canadian Consulate General
1251 Avenue of Americas
New York, NY 10020
John Salonich
Activated Carbon Resources, Inc.
415 Main Street
Ridgefield, CT 06877
Keith Sampson
Product Manager
Rochester Midland Corporation
101 C. Constitution Blvd.
Franklin, MA 02038
C. J. Santhanam
Principal
Santhanam Associates
260 East Street
Lexington, MA 02173
123
-------
Robert W. Santy
Deputy Commissioner
Department of Economic Development
State of Connecticut
865 Brook Street
Rocky Hill, CT. 06067-3405
Dennis Sasseville
Associate Vice President
Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc.
Five Overlook Drive
Amherst, NH 03031
Charles Sawyer
Asst. Professor of Civil Engineering
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269
Anthony Scarnati
Business Manager
Laborers' Local Union #56
P.O. Box 1111
Greenwich, CT 06836
Robert Schechter
President
Equity Communications
535 Madison Ave.
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Glen Schricker
RIM
198 Fisher Avenue
Boston, MA 02120
Thomas E. Sen warm
President-Hydrogeologist
Acadia Environmental Technology
4 Milk Street
Portland, ME 04101
Richard Secchia
Stone & Webster
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Bruce Sewter
Manager, Technical Services
Doolan Environmental
2 Eves Drive
Marlton, NJ 08053
Jon Shaffer, Ph.D.
President
Closed Eco-Systems Technology, Inc.
191 New York Ave.
Huntington, NY 11743
Douglas Shattuck
Manager Hazardous Waste Sales Support
AWT/Metcalf & Eddy
30 Harvard Mill Square
Wakefield, MA 01880
Curtiss Shewmaker
President
Shewmaker Environmental, Inc.
P.O. Box 121
Campbellville, KY 42719
W. Leigh Short
Vice President
Woodward-Clyde Consultants
201 Willowbrook Blvd.
Wayne, NJ 07470
Gary Simard
Project Engineer
HRP Associates, Inc.
167 New Britain Avenue
Plainville, CT 06062
Thomas Singer
Director of Research
Western Governors' Association
600 17th St.
Suite 1705 South
Denver, CO 80202
Bill Slack
President
Envirotechnic's
P.O. Box 34668
Cincinnati, OH 45239
124
-------
Michael M. Smith
Project Development Engineer
U.S. Pollution Control Inc.
Six Neshaminy Interplex
Suite 203
Trevose, PA 19053
Robert E. Smyth
Regional Sales Director
Thermatrix, Inc.
8000 Midlantic Drive
Suite 2015
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Mark Sneeringer, Ph.D.
Manager of Remediation Vendor Development
General Electric
Corporate Research & Development
P.O. Box 8
Building K-l, Room 3A25
Schenectady, NY 12301
Gail L. Snuggs
Vice President
CPRT Inc.
622 Giurdwara Road
Nepean, Ontario, CANADA K2E 8A2
Larry Soular
Vice President
AM-RE Services
555 College Road East
Princeton, NJ 08543
Larry Soular
Vice President
AM-RE Services
555 College Road East
Princeton, NJ 08543
Dean S. Spencer, Esquire
Senior Deputy General Counsel
Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental
Protection
One Winter Street
Boston, MA 02108
Cheryl L. Sprague Carver
Environmental EngineerVRemedial Project
Manager
U.S. EPA, Region I
JFK Federal BIdg\HSN-CAN5
Boston, MA 02203
Greg Stacy
PRC
644 Lin Street
Cincinnati, OH 45203
Christopher Stan
Environmental Programs Manager
State of Connecticut, Dept. Econ. Dev.
865 Brook Street
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
Richard Standish
Office Director
Atlantic Environmental Services, Inc.
188 Norwich Avenue
Colchester, CT 06415
David Steele
Technical Sales
North East Environmental Products, Inc.
17 Technology Drive
West Lebanon, NH 03784
Larry Steele
Procurement Representative
S.B.A.
150 Church Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Werner Steiner
President
Art International, Inc.
100 Ford Road
Denville, NJ 07824
Yoshio Suto
Visiting Engineer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3 Standish Lane
Winchester, MA 01890
125
-------
Paul G. Sutton
Vice President
Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc.
5 Centennial Drive
Peabody, MA 01960
John J. Sweeney
Vice President - Business Development
Western Product Recovery Group (WPRG)
536 Harmony Brass Castle Road
Phillipsburg, NJ 08865
Anna Symington
Environmental Analyst
Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental
Protection
436 Dwight Street
Springfield, MA 01103
Vance A. Syphers
Vice President
Environmental Scientific Inc.
5400 S. Miami Blvd.
Morrisville, NC 27560
Dag Syrrist
Vice President
Technology Funding, Inc.
2000 Alameda De Los Tulgas
Suite 250
San Mateo, CA 94403
Carole A. Taylor
Executive Director, Environmental Science
Div.
NuArc Scientific, Inc.
260 Chatham Road
West Grove, PA 19390
Edward O. Taylor
Chief Executive Officer
NuArc Scientific, Inc./EPAT, Inc.
260 Chatham Road
West Grove, PA 19390
Carter Terenzini
Marketing Representative
C. T. Male Associates, P.C.
50 Century Hill Drive
Box 727
Latham, NY 12110
Edwin S. Tharp
Controller
E.A. RTI
11019 McCormick Road
Hunt Valley, MD 21031
Jay Thomas
Marketing Supervisor
Sippican, Inc.
7 Barnabas Rd.
Marion, MA 02738
David Tiernan
Northeast Regional Manager
ATC\Denison Environmental Services
600 W. Cummings Park
Boston, MA 01801
Edward F. Tierney
Bisco Environmental
900A Providence Highway
Dedham, MA 02026
Michael Tranghese
Field Representative
Massachusetts Laborers' District Council
7 Laborers' Way
Hopkinton, MA 01748
John C. Trocciola
Program Manager
International Fuel Cells Corporation
P.O. Box 739
195 Governors Highway
South Windsor, CT 06074
Mark P. Truebenbach
President
True Enterprises, Inc.
434 Morris Rd
Fort Wright, KY 41011
126
-------
Michael A. Tucchio
President
Creative Technolgies, Inc.
11 Legendary Road
East Lyme, CT 06333
Gil Tyler
Business Development Manager
Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
110 National Drive
Glastonbury, CT 06033
Joanne Van Vechten
Acting District Director
U.S. Small Business Administration
Hartford District Office
330 Main Street, 2nd Floor
Hartford, CT 06106
Jack Van Wie
Operations Analyst
New York State Science & Technology
Foundation
99 Washington Avenue
Suite 1730
Albany, NY 12210
Anthony Varbero
Business Manager
Laborers' Local Union #146
7 Van Zant Street
Norwalk, CT 06855
Pankaj Varshney, P.E.
Senior Chemical Engineer
Louis Berger Associates
110 Halsted Street
East Orange, NJ 07019
Steve Vernali
Field Representative
Laborers' Local Union #611
1000 West Main Road
New Britain, CT 06058
Chris Vincze
Senior Vice President
ATC Environmental, Inc.
600 W. Cummings Park
Boston, MA 01801
Spencer Viner
Hazardous Waste Program Director
Laborers-AGC Education and Training Fund
37 Deerfield Road
P.O. Box 37
Pomfert Center, CT 06259
David Vlach
Manager, Industrial Services
Envirobusiness
701 Concord Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
Deborah C. Waddell
Vice President
Terra Systems, Inc.
201 Route 17
Suite 300
Rutherford, NJ 07070
Allen R. Walker
Director of Engineering
Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Brown's Wharf
Newburyport, MA 01950
William Walsh
President
Geoscience Services
11 Coolidge
Acton, MA 01720
Donald J. Wanamaker
Vice President
Environmental Management Ltd.
35 Orangeburg Road
Orangeburg, NY 10962
Maxwell J. Warren
Director, Business Development
PCS Inc.
22 Main Street
Centerbrook, CT 06409
Robert Wasp
President
Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
142 Temple Street
New Haven, CT 06510
127
-------
John G. Watkins
PresidentACEO
Pollution Management Industries
5994 Broadmoor Drive
La Mesa, CA 91942
Maria Weigand
Owner
Environmental Technician Services
P.O. Box 281
Whiting, NJ 08759
Steven Weigand
Sr. Field Technician
Environmental Technican Services
P.O. Box 281
Whiting, NJ 08259
Scott Weiner
Chief Counsel to the Governor of New Jersey
Office of the Governor
CN001
124 W. State Street
Trenton, NJ 08625
Jennifer Weise
Project Hydrogeologist
Espinoza Consultants and Services
3915 Research Park Drive
A-13
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
Jim Westburg
Director of Business Development
Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc.
Five Overlook Drive
Amherst, NH 03031
Philip Whalen
Senior Chemical Engineer
P. J. Whalen and Assoc. Ltd.\Grace Dearborn
Inc.
92 Regent St.
Fredericton, New Brunswick, CANADA E3B
3W4
Marcus White
Herington, White & Company
160 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Wayne R. Whitford
Assistant Vice President
Sedgwick Environmental Services
40 Broad Street
Boston, MA 02109
Albert E. Whiting
President
Northeast Site Remediation
54 Alna Lane
East Hartford, CT 06108
Gary Whitney
Business Development Manager
United Technologies Research Center
Silver Lane
East Hartford, CT 06108
Lee Wikstrom, Ph.D.
Consulting Scientist
Olin
350 Knotter Drive
Cheshire, CT 06410
Edward B. Wilber
Vice President
Northeast Site Remediation
54 Alna Lane
East Hartford, CT 06108
James Williams
U.S. Small Business Administration
Business Development
330 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Kenneth Wiswall
Dir. Waste Management Services-Northeast
Engineering Science and Technology
3 Washington Center
Newburgh, NY 12590
128
-------
Brad D. Wright
Engineer
Ensign-Bickford HAZ-PROS, Inc.
100 Grist Mill Road
P.O. Box 369
Simsbury, CT 06070
Bill Zaist
Senior Project Manager
Geo-Con., Inc.
4075 Monroeville Blvd.
Corporate One Bldg. II, Ste. 400
Monroeville, PA 15146
Mark Zessin, P.E.
President
Anchor Engineering Services, Inc.
287 Main Street
East Hartford, CT 06118
129
------- |